The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-02-019 PARTIES OF RECORD FALK ANNEXATION & PREZONE/LUA02-019 Joe & Martha MacKenzie Louis Longo Jim & Susan Claeys 18533 102�d Ave. SE 18509 102"d Ave. SE 4708 Smithers Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 425-255-7353 425-255-1265 425-793-9442 Reid McNair Debra Metts 18525 102"d Ave. SE 10339 SE 187t" PI. Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 425-235-2856 425-271-9314 P.O.R..doc/ a 7 - � � d� 0 � � , - p � � '' o a ��. S 8 t St � � 4 � o � C� � , Q � 4? C� � o � � p � . Q � � N � �� 0 o � � ❑ Q SE 188th St � d S Q � � � , N --- - ----- - - -- � - -�---- �� -`� --� --- i . � . CITY OF RENTON PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Date: November 16, 2006 To: City Clerk's Office From: Holly Graber � Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: . Falk Annexation & Zoning LUA (file) Number: LUA-02-019, A, R, EDF Cross-References:, Ordinance 5041 AKA's: ' Project Manager: Don Erickson Acceptance Date: � February 11, 2002 z Applicant: �: Nina Falk Owner: ` � Contact: �� Don Erickson � PID Number: S 47th ST and 102"d Ave SE ERC Approval Date: January 14, 2003 ERC Appeal Date: February 3, 2003 Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: i. Date Appealed to 64EX: � By Whom: " HEX Decision: . Date: ' Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision• Date: December 1, 2003 " Mylar Recording fVumber: Project Description: ANNEXATION OF 13.66 ACRES & PROPOSED R-8 ZONING � ' Location: S 47th ST and 102nd Ave SE � Comments: ,- '�" . - . �_- - � �- �' - � ;« ., r CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5 0 41 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ItENTON, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY KNOWN AS THE FALK ANNEXATION, BY THE ELECTION METHOD, AND SETTING THE TAXATION RATE, ESTABLISHING ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS, AND FIXING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE A1�TNEXATIOleT. WHEREAS, after public hearing, the City Council enacted a resolution calling for an annexation by election under RCW 35A.14.015 for an area commonly referred to as the. Fa1k Annexation, which area is the property generally bounded by the existing City boundaries to the north boundary (the southern edge of South 47th Street) and west, the northern edge of SE 185�' Place, if extended, to the south, and the eastern edge of 102nd Avenue SE to the east, legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth; and WHEREAS, said resolution also called for an election on a proposition tha.t the property in the Falk Annexation should�be subject to existing bonded indebtedness; and WHEREAS, said resolution also called for an election on the proposition that all property located within the territory to be annexed, excluding street right-of-ways, shall, simultaneous with the annexation, have imposed City of Renton zoning regulations, with a Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Single Family(RS) and a zoning designation of R-8;and WHEREAS, said proposed annexation had been submitted to and approved by the King. County Boundary Review Board; and WHEREAS, an election was held pursuant to State statute; and WHEREAS, in the September 16, 2003 election for the Falk Annexation, the assumption of indebtedness, and the zoning regulations were approved by the voters; and , - � • - � `�' -.} -j --? ORDINANCE NO. 5 0 41 - • WHEREAS, the election results certifying a sufficient majority to permit annexation of the area have been received by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF T'HE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The City Council finds it to be in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Renton to annex and does hereby annex the territory submitted to the voters as the . Falk Annexation situated in King County, Washington, as contiguous, proximate and adjacent to the present corporate limits of the City and as more particularly described by its legal description as set forth in Exhibit A and graphically shown on E�ibit B, attached hereto and incorporated in full by this reference. SECTION II. The territory set forth in this ordinance and for which said election results were certified for annexation should be and is hereby made a part of the City of Renton. The area shall be assessed and taxed at the same rate on the same basis as property within the City of Renton to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton, which indebtedness has been approved by the voters, contracted for, or incurred �prior to or existing at,the date of annexation. � SECTION III. Zoning for the annexed area is hereby designated as R-8, with a Comprehensive Plan designation of RS (Residential Single Family). SECTION IV. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and sha11 take effect five days after its passage, approval, and publication. 2 . M , ' '~ � _ �� "� ' ORDINANCE NO. 5 0 41 -� PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 1 st day of December , 2003. � GUGZL�� Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this ;:st day of December , 2003. �� Jesse � anner,Mayor Approved as to form: ��J Lawrence J. Warreri, City Attorney Date of Publication: _12/5/2 0 0 3 (s ummary) ORD.1051:10/7/03:ma. 3 � _ . �� Xhlbl� � X • ORDINANCE NOo 5041 -° FAI,I�Al`Tl�XATIOl�t - LEGAI, DESCRIPTION That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 32, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying northerly of the south line of the north 72 feet of the south half(1/2) of said subdivision; EXCEPT the east 20 feet thereof; TOGETHER WITH those portions of the west 30 feet of the Norkheast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the east 20 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, all in Section 32, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying northerly of a line described as follows: Beginning said line at a point on the west boundary line of tlie plat of Windsor � Heights, as recorded in Volume 173 of Plats, Pages 28 through 30, inclusive,records of King County, Washington, said point being 102.80 feet southerly of the northwest corner of said plat and also being a point on the easterly right of way margin of 102nd Ave SE; Thence westerly along said line, said line being perpendicular to said plat boundary line and right of way margin, crossing 102 Ave SE,to an intersection with the . westerly right of way margin of 102°d Ave SE and the termination of said line. ."`\'� r � ' � . ' ORDINANC� NO. 5041 �Xh �b�t B S 47th Street SE 186th St o� > -� � � 0 Fal k An nexation o 200 4°° Gti�Y o,,{, EDNSP 1 : 2400 * � ; 24 October 2003 • �'t'NTO�$ Holly Graber- 12-01-03.doc _ , Page 4 ;� � �� I i December 1,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 4 � C i ,. i �,..,. � _..,_, i �. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY PERSSON, ( COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. j CARRIED. � CORItESPOND�NCE Letters were read from Joe Pruss,Basic Ventures,Inc., 18211 240th Ave.SE, i Citizen Comment:Pruss et al- Maple Valley,98038;Jacki Stuart Pruss,Residential Real Estate, 18211 240th � Sewer Service Connection Ave.SE,Maple Valley,98038;and Gary Hartnett, 9771 184th Ct.NE, � Request for Properties Outside Kirkland,98052;all requesting connection to sewer for properties(lots 17, 18 j City Limits and 20)located outside the City limits on the East Renton Plateau near the i intersection of SE 124th St. and 155th Ave. SE. MOVED BY KEOLKER- � WHEELER,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCII,REFER THESE � LETTERS TO THE UTII,ITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. � Added At the request of Councilman Clawson,a letter was read from Rosemary i _.... Citizen Comment: Quesenberry, 3609 SE 18th Ct.,Renton,98058,urging the hiring of additional Quesenberry-Police police officers to assure citizen safety,and the establishment of a policy that ' Department Staffing responds to the change in the number of police officers available to respond to ' service calls due to military obligations and routine absences. � OLD BUSINESS Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval� Finance Committee Claim Vouchers 221264-221647 and two wire transfers totaling Finance: Vouchers $2,557,684.03; and approval of�Payroll Vouchers 47603 -47837,one wire ' transfer and 567 direct deposits totaling$1,771,628.68. MOVED BY ! PARKER,SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE � COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. I ��., ORDINANCES AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption: :` RESOLUTIONS ; Resolution#3671 A resolution was read endorsing the adoption and implementation of the State , Finance: Streamlined Sales of Washington's streamlined sales taxes concept concurrent only upon Federal Tax adoption of Internet and catalog sales taxes; where the State of Washington adopts a point of delivery sales tax collection system for interstate sales,but ! orders the Department of Revenue to distribute sales tax to Washington cities I based on point of sale. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED j BY BRIERE,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. ' CARRIED. � The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and � adoption: Ordinance#5041 An ordinance was read annexing contiguous unincorporated territory known as j . ��}�,�f��.��(�,.��'� � � � e Falk Annexation consisting of 6.43 acres bounded by S.47th St. to the � �� :��"� — north,SE 185th Pl.to the south,and 102nd Ave.SE to the east,by the election ' method; and setting the taxation rate,establishing a zoning classification of R- ', L k� O a. - d �� 8,and fixing the effective date of the annexation as December 10,2003. ! MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL ADOPT � THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. i Ordinance#5042 An ordinance was read establishing the property tax levy for the year 2004 for � Budget:2004 Property Tax both general purposes and for voter approved bond issues. MOVED BY � Levy PARKER,SECONDED BY CORMAN,COLTNCIL ADOPT THE ; ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. i � � ,. ., i i � I I � � � � _.� : ;,�. ' � - . � � CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3615 A RESOLUTION OF TIiE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CALLING FOR THE ANNEXATION, BY ELECTION, OF CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON LYING IN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY THE CITY OF RENTON CORPORATE BOUNDARY, INCLUDING S. 47TH STREET, TO THE NORTH; SE 185TH PLACE, IF EXTENDED, TO THE SOUTIi; 102� AVENUE SE, TO THE EAST; AND THE EXISTING CITY BOUNDARY, TO THE WEST. (FALK ANNEXATION) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, has deternuned that it would be in the best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton to annex the property generally bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary, including S. 47`�' Street, to the north; SE 185� Place, if extended, to the south; 102°d Avenue SE, to the east; and the existing City boundary, to the west; legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth; and WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous to call for an election for this annexation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would ' be served by the annexa.tion of contiguous unincorporated territory lying generally in the area bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary, including S. 47th Street, to the north; SE 185�' Place, if extended, to the south; 102°d Avenue SE, to the east; and the existing City � RESOLUTION NO. 3615 �. :�; ,. boundary, to the west; legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth. SECTION III. As nearly as can be determined the number of voters residing in the aforesaid territory is two. � SECTION IV. The City Council hereby calls for an election to be held pursuant to Chapter 35A.14 RCW to submit to the voters of the aforesaid territory the proposal for annexation. SECTION V. There shall also be submitted to the electorate of the territory sought to be annexed a proposition that all property located within the territory to be annexed shall, upon anne�.tion, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property located within the City of Renton is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton, which indebtedness has been approved by the voters, contracted for, or incurred prior to or existing at,the date of annexation. SECTION VI. There shall also be submitted to the electorate of the territory sought to be annexed a proposition that all property located within the territory to be annexed = shall, simultaneous with the annexation, have imposed the City of Renton zoning regulations, . pre�ared.under RCW 35.A.14.340, with.a Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Single Family(RS) and a zoning designa.tion of R-8 (Residential single family, 8 dwelling units per acre). SECTION VII. The cost of said annexation election shall be paid by the City of Renton. SECTION VIII. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Resolution with the King County Council and with the King County Boundary Review Board. 2 . . .' • ; ' • RESOLUTION NO. 3615 " SECTION IX. The City Clerk shall also file with the King County Boundary Review Boazd a Notice of Intention hereof as required by RCW 36.93.090 et seq. PASSED BY THE CITY COLJNCIL this 2�t h day of J a nu a ry , 200.:... '�I. C�JLz�� Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2�t h �y o f J a n u a r y , 20G.... - � Je Tanner,Mayor Approv to form: � Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.953:1/23/03:ma _ I' 3 RESOLUTION L��.z..361;�- -t � EXHIBIT .A � R- _ -� . FALK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 32,Township23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,King County, Washington, lying northerly of the south line of the north 72 feet of the south half(1/2)of said subdivision; EXCEPT the east 20 feet thereof; TOGETHER WITH those portions of the west 30 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the east 20 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, a11 in Section 32,Township 23 North, Range.5 East,W.M.,King County, Washington, lying northerly of a line described as follows: Beginning said line at a point on the west boundary line of the plat of Windsor Heights, as recorded in Volume 173 of Plats, Page 28 through 30, inclusive, records of King County, Washington, said point being 102.80 feet southerly of the northwest corner of said plat and also being a point on the easterly right of�way mazgin of 102nd Ave SE; Thence westerly along said line, said line being perpendicular to said plat boundary line and right of way margin, crossin� 102 Ave SE,to an intersection with the westerly right of way margin of 102n Ave SE and the termination of said line. ►.��m�l►� V ■ ■ � �■�■ �I■■■■�� I � � �� ,� � .�i�u�� ■ ■ �► C ,�� IIIIIII C •� ' � 7�� -�� - l\�m� '�►�� mmm�� ='�'� ■ �� L111�11'� � i �i �111 ��III�II�_. .. �� ' ■ �� '� . �� , . .. � .�. � ■u , �� ■ ' �� J��a■� � � ■ ■ � O�Illlllz,. � , -� ' i il I _ —�-�� -%�Illlll��j� ,� �1�� y �� .':� ==: '�_ `1 :.: �� .. . �� , .. . 1 � :i�i�� :: : � , ��II � �� :: : -i, - � �� • � '� � �� . �11. � � . � 1� I��I�� •� � ■ :,� � ■ ��15�1� Il�i _ , , � / , � . i.r �� _�� , �■�I� . ' �i i � �ii'.�� ' � �, �� i ji:�►` �� ' -.■ 1 ' ,�'�,' I � �� ►�� i '�. . � �� , �� ■ -�� i� •�� 1 - ',��" _ • �� :�� '� i .-_ � '+I _��1 � ��•�� _. . _ , r . _...... . .►...........: I�� .... �... • :,•.�.,•.� ��,.' �, : � I��■�■ .►�1� �� ■� �� 1��. �■■■■�� \�� .. ��1.� - �■■�■�� r�C ,_ - �� ■ �� I �� _ � ■ �� I /�� ,` �� - - ��1�/� ��I��:� , �� ►�� / , � ��I �� 1� �/►� � �quu I��111��►�� C�' �i�� III -�� ' �I� �. � ♦ � �� -� � :�n�ti I��I'��►��_ _��■■■�' �11111111111111: �� i � amnl\�r �C■ �� _ ■ � `� n1u�NI�� . �C■ �.■ �� I � � L7�►�i ��i �:� �� j��.�.�,:��i��11� � �'�11 ��►1��i j �11��►�� `� � �■ � ■7.�►� �� .. ' . -� rL■ ��m ��►� -� �►� : nun '-=-��/11�� ►�. � �:��►� : mmnl�� "�:� = � j�� = i i��'��,��1�� L� �� I� "� - � � r�� - �7 ■�� ►�� i��1��j,� � L:�� 1 � _ ��I �i �� n�!.�1�,� �r� � i�� rJ��i��Ij 1- ��I�� Ili�i� :�� i ■�� _ ��: :%��1; .�' � ��' r , •��'�� I�� r � 'II�►�I ♦ � � �� i��`'iiii��='�-:-�7� ��III ,■r��ii5!I � � ..��I �� ' �\��i�� 1 � ' � � � �'� �1:� ;:;� J ■� � : �� '�I��:: �i '� � � �� , � � �'L��i i -��■�� :� ,. � ► I I � �v��LJIn t�� I,fi � � r� \. � ��` 1\ �. ��■ � � 1 ` `/r►� �� ■■■ � \ 1�1�11� ��;■ �=� � � ■_ �.�i ■IIL. � 1 �i!�..��•�. i�� = =- -: � � ►�.. .��11 1�/: ' :C C: ■� � i Ji►�■� �♦ ' ..�� •� p� � � ■ � ��I��1�� ; :: : ■�� ■ ♦ � . �� .� ■■■�■. � ■ �i..�.i��. ...,.:,:, ��►�► � : ��: � :�:- 7111� • ��!�IIII '! =i11 �■�,.;�;�.,=s= =�iir. � ■11� � � ;; r �\�� .��,�� ,�� ►r i� � ► � �i'ii�C ii "� �Ir�■ ■ ��■■��: I: �■■��rl �III '�. .. ��►�C� �-_ . �. .. �--. .�� ` .��r,,:1■ :��.,_•. .�, :_: :: .-==1=== ---�� - - . _� . _ ' ' r ' " ��- � .� � ,� �� ; .;:. � � ::.: ■� ..._..... ;::.;. � �. . .• ., . � � �_ • . � � �� .�� •��. �.�. � �• J , , . . .• :• .. •� . .. . '�� .•. -• • :• •. i ,�.-- � �,�� . .�a a a � S 47th Str �� `'. ;_ _ _;,>,�`' ;,, ;;��; _ - �_`� _ �a: L� �' - - - ��;;;=:�:: _ �;;�:.,�. _ _ - �;:.;�,::,,.. :_:,�� `��,.��:::�:.:';:�>:,`:;: :: d � - _ f� - ��=: �:,�: _ - ❑ ::;::�;'{ _ - �:`"�_ - - _ �;:� �s''� - - ;;r... - � � o � � � � aa SE 186th St Q _ ❑ � � �3 o � � Q �l ❑ �, � � � � � > o Q � � � � � Q ❑ L`� o � �C� ►� �, �� Q SE 188th St o � s � � � � ❑ Q� Q � �'I � � o � � � Q � � � � � F�I � �� t�� 0 300 600 Exhibit 2: Existing Structures 1:3,600 Uti�Y o,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � Existing Structure � ♦.+ AlexPietsch,actingAdministxator o � � Existing Corporate Boundary G Del Rosario �'�Nzo$ �9ne��zooz Proposed Annexation Boundary .. - � -- ; ' ,- ` , --- . ' . " � ' . �� : , � . ' ,. ; CIT� D� RENTON , . : � ..LL '� � . � '. , Office of the City Attorney , � � .Lawrence J:Warren . . - 'Jesse.Tanner,Mayor ' � � - , - . ; . � , , _ Assistant,City Attorneys _ ; ' ' , : , . Mark Barber - � - � , . , . � � , .'. Zanetta�,L.,Fontes ; � - " Russell S. Wilson.: , � . 1VIEMORANDUM � . . . , Ann S: Nielsen' . • ; ' � . , ' . . ; - . ' � r Sasha P: Alessi ., ,. , To: .,. .. Don Erickson, EDNSP . . ' . ; ' � ; ,. , , ,. ; , �, , . , . �� _ " . , . '. � ` � From: '. ' Lawrence J: Warren, City,Attorney � : - ` � - - , ' ` '. ., ' , . � : . . , ' .,��'�� '��; . ' Date:. , Novemlier 10 2003 . , ' .� - : . , ' . „ _ . ' . � . , � , . ; .��: � �� - : .:-:s,-:;s ',{:�{.:�;e;,. �� - ,Subject: . : Falk-Annexation Ordina.nce . , '. ,i .�5;.-.,,:• �;�ce�,a��M,�;�v� . ', , � ':� I have enclosed a copy.of the above-mentioried ordinance'.� The original has.been sent�to the City _ � : •,. _ . _ ' � Clerk. ._ , , . � .� ,. . ' '. , ; . . . _ . � , , � ' � � � , � ' ' � � , ' �. � �, . , � � 1, Lawrence J. Warren � � - . . , � � . � . , . . :_ � . . . . . , �� , � , 'LJW:ma: � ' ; ; . - , , , .. � Enc.. -, . ,. -: " . '. : . � . , , . , , . - . cc: "Jay�Covington �, . ; . � . . , , . � "Bonnie I. Walton ' . - .. . . ; . " _ , . ,. _ . , _ .. - . - . - ; , , ; . , � - . ', . . , . .. . . . - ' , Post�O�ce Box�626-Renton,Washingtori 98057-�(425)255-8678'/FAX(42'S)255=5474 ' R E N T O.N . �, ; �Thispapercontain550%recycledmateria1,30%postconsumer `.AHEAD OF THE CU.RVE� ' ,' r}� r + - , i- . . , , CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. � AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY KNOWN AS THE FALK ANNEXATION, B� THE ELECTION METHOD, AND SETTING THE TAXATION RATE, ESTABLISHING ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS, AND FIXING T13E EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE ANNEXATION. WHEREAS, after public hearing, the City Council enacted a resolution calling for an annexation by election under RCW 35A.14.015 for an area commonly referred to as the Falk Annexation, which area is th�e property generally bounded by the existing City boundaries to the north baundary (the southern edge of South 47`� Street) and west, the northern edge of SE 185�` P1ace, if extended, to the south, and the eastern edge of 102"a Avenue SE to the east, legally described in E�ibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth; and WHEItEAS, said resolution also called for an election on a proposition that the property in the Falk Annexation should be subject to existing bonded indebtedness; and WHEREAS, said resolution also called for an election on the proposition that all property located within the tenitory to be annexed, excluding street right-of-ways, shall, simultaneous with the annexation, have imposed City of Renton zoning regulations, with a Comprehensive Plan. � designation of Residential Single Family(RS) and a zoning designation of R-8;and WHEREAS, said proposed annexa.tion had been submitted to and approved by the King County Boundary Review Board; and WHEREAS, an election was held pursuant to State statute;and WHEREAS, in the September 16, 2003 election for the Falk Annexation, the assumption of indebtedness, and the zoning regulations were approved by the voters; and _ �. i i r " '� �- � � � �` T ORDINANCE NO. , WHEREAS, the election results certifying a sufficient majority to pernut annexation of the area have been received by the.City; � NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The City Council finds it to be in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Renton to annex and does hereby annex the territory submitted to the voters as the Falk Annexation situated in King County, Washington, as contiguous, proximate and adjacent to the present corporate limits of the City and as more particularly described by its legal description as set forth in Exhibit A and graphically shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated in full by this reference. SECTION II. The territory set forth in this ordinance and for which said election results were certified for annexation should be and is hereby made a part of the City of Renton. The area shall be assessed and.taxed at the same rate on the same basis as property within ihe City . of Renton to pay for all or any portion of the autstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton, which indebtedness has been approved by the voters, contracted for, or incurred prior to or existing at, the date of anne�.tion. SECTION III. Zoning for the annexed area is hereby designated as R-8, with a Comprehensive Plan designation of RS (Residential Single Family). � SECTION IV. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five days after its passage, approval, and publication. /// /// 2 �; , . .� � ~ � ' � ORDINANCE NO. - ` ,: _. , � PASSED BY THE CIT'Y COUNCIL this day of , 2003. � Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2003. Jesse Tanner, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence 3. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1051:10/7/03:ma 3 ,: < < '�� ^ ' Exhcbit A FALK ANNEXATION �� LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 32, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying northerly of the south line of the north 72 feet of the south half(1/2) of said subdivision; EXCEPT the east 20 feet thereof; ' � TOGETHER WITH those portions of the west 30 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the east 20 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, all in Section 32, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,King County, Washington, lying northerly of a line described as follows: Beginning said line at a point on the west boundary line of tfie plat of Windsor � Heights, as recorded in Volume 173 of Plats,Pages 28 through 30, inclusive,records of King County, Washington, said point being 102.80 feet southerly of the northwest corner of said plat and also being a point on the easterly right of way margin of 102°a Ave SE; Thence westerly along said line, said line being perpendicular to said plat boundary line and right of way margin, crossin� 102 Ave SE,to an intersection with the . westerly right of way margin of 102° Ave SE and the termination of said line. , . „ , - � Exhibit B S 47th Street . � SE 186th St o.� > � � cu 0 F a I k A n n exat i o n o 200 4°° Gti'�y o� EDNSP 1 : 2(�� * _� + 24 October2003 ' �ANT� - , - , ;, � � ;---------------------------------------------' ---------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- � �, r A1V ORDER OF THE DIRECTOR RECORDS, ELECTIONS AND LICENSING SERVICES DIVIS�F R��fi`�t�� KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON � ��?�! � � �QJ3 , , �--- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_; -------------------------- r��cFov�D ;��c�.��o�� WHEREAS, the Council of King County, Washington, did present on June 12, 2003 r inance No. 14675 dated June 9, 2003 wherein they direct that a Special Election be held pursuant to RCW 29.13.010 and 35A.14.050 for submission to the qUalified voters of the Proposed Annexation Area Known as the Falk Property, three propositions for their consideration; and .�_ WHEREAS, said governing body states that an emergency exists and, accordingly, requests that the Special Election be'held September 16, 2003 in conjunction with the Primary; and VVHEFLEAS, the request is found to be in compliance with the pertinent statutes governing special elections; NOW,THEREFOItE,BE IT ORDERED by the Director of King County Records,Elecfions and Licensing Services Division as ex-officio supervisor of elections, having deemed that,an emergency exists, that.a Special Election shall be held in the Proposed Annexation Area Known as the Falk Property on September 16, 2003, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified �oters of said jurisdiction the following ballot measures: PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF THE AREA KNOWN AS THE FALK PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF RENTON � PROPOSITION N0. 1 PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RENTON Shall the area of unincorporated King County contiguous to the city of Renton and commonly known as the Falk pro�erty, which is legally described in King County Ordinance'No. 14675 and city of Renton Resolution No. 3615, be annexed to and become part of the city of Renton? FOR ANNEXATION � AGAINST ANNEXATION . PROPOSITION NO.Z ASSUMPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS Shall all property within the area, upon annexation,be assessed and taxed at the same rate as the property located within the city of Renton is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the then outstanding indebtedness of the city, which indebtedness has been approved by the voters, contracted for, or incurred prior to, or existing at, the date of annexation? YES NO � ��';�',p,�1��✓�=,�'��i��-�-z..--.-��w��:` 1 �� Proposed Annexation of the Area Known as the Falk Property To the City of Renton Page 2 . PROPOSITION NO: 3 PROPOSED ZONING REGULATION Shall all property located within the territory to be annexed, excluding street rights-of-ways, simultaneous with the annexation have imposed the city of Renton zoning regulations, with a comprehensive plan designation of residential single family (RS) and a zoning designation of R-8? FOR ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING REGULATION AGAIIVST ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING REGULATION The foregoing ballot title has been certified in accordance with RCW 29.27.065. DATED at Seattle,Washington, this 23rd day of June,2003. ' � I erim Director,Records,Elections and � � I.icensing Services Division, King County � King County GlTYO�FRE��"�,� Department of Executive Services . ��g� � � LC1�� Records, Elections and Licensing Services Division Elections Section �j� R��i�� King County Administration Building 500 4'h Avenue,Rm.553' Seattle,WA 98104-2337 206-296-1565 Fax 206-296-0108 TTY 206-296-0109 June 16, 2003 �� 1��`�5� �� Ms. Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council ��,t� . Metropolitan King County Council �' King County Courthouse l�� ./.�/os MS: KCGCG1025 1�� y RE: IZequest for Special Election,Acknowled�ement of Receipt Dear Ms. Noris, This letter serves to acknowledge receipt of Ordinance No. 14675 requesting that a Special Election be held in King County,Washington, in conjunction with the I'rimary on September 16, 2003. 'The ballot measures will a ear on the balIot as Proposition Nos. 1, 2 and 3,for the proposed annexation area known as the Falk property. A copy of the Order of Election will be sent immediately following the review of the official ballot title. If you have any questions about the calendar for this election or the administration of your election,please call Election Operations.Supervisor Linda SancHez at (206) 296-1565 Sincerely, Pam Floyd Acting Assistant Superintendent � _._ir,_._e ,--,=Y.,..^,,y-, -r,-.1�,-.....�„ ._�.-:.,,,.,:...-i;-'' :;+.,';;�„.�Ir»ti.,B;x`��R:�s:•.,ii. r;r-,r .,�.-.,.,, rr.t��'�'` �,.�_�;t`i.'!;`"��?_��`y��_c;,:. .. , ��,�� _ �%,;;�.�'�_IIfS�:P:�J._�: ,;.�� _,,.�_�..�. __.-.., . __. _ _ . ._ -�. � ��'�� ' J U i� 6 2003 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, King County NEIGNBORHOODS, ANU STRATEG!C PLANNING �� Department of Executive Services Records, Elections and Licensing Services Division Elections Section King County Administration Building 500 4'�'Avenue, Rm.553 Seattle,WA 98104-2337 206-296-1565 Fax 206-296-0108 TTY 206-296-0109 June 4, 2003 City of Renton Don Erickson 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 R�: Petition for Annexataon Dear Mr. Erickson: King County elections received a petition on April 22, 2003 from the City of Renton. The petition called for an annexation election to the City of Renton of the area known as the Fall< Annexation area. The legal reference governing this petition is RCW 35A.14.020, which states the petition be "signed by electors resident in such territory equal in number to 10 percent of the votes at the last general election". There are six registered voters in this annexation area. The petition contained one signature. The number of signatures required for sufficiency is one. The number of - si�ilatures foun��o L-e vul;d is one. King County Elections has found this petition for annexation to be sufficient. Sincerely, � �r1��2.�� Julie Moore Acting Superintendent i" -f � 1 � - Washington State Boundary dZeview Board For King County Central Building, Suite 608,810 3rd Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-1645 Phone (206) 296-6800 •Fax (206)296-6803 April 11,2003 �,�� A,PR 1 �+ Z003 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, City of Renton AND STRr�TEC(C PLANNING Aitn: Don Erickson, Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RE: CLOSING LETTER FOR COMPLETED ACTION—File No. 2143—City of Renton— Falk Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: We are writing to advise you that the Boundary Review Board has now completed the required � Evaluation, as specified in RCW 36.93, for the above-referenced proposed action(filed with the Board,effectiye February 24,2003. The Boundary Review Board also provided a 45-day public review period February 24—Apri110, 2003, as prescribed by RCW 36.93. The Board received no request for a public hearing of this proposed action during the public review period. The Boundary Review Board, therefore, hereby deems this proposed action approved effective April 11, 2003. Final approval of the proposed action is also subject to the following actions, where applicable: 1. Sewer and Water District actions and some other actions are also subject to approval by the - Metropolitan King County Council. If tlie Council makes changes to the proposal, ine Boa"rd may then be required to hold a public hearing. 2. Filing with King County of franchise application(s),as required, accompanied by a copy of this letter. 3. Filing with King County of permit application(s), as required,accompanied by a copy of this letter. •. , 4: �Fulfillment of all other statutory requiremerits and/or`procedures specified in your Notice of Intention. y�= � Page two continued,April 11, 2003 Form 13 , 5. Notification to King County Office of Regional Policy and Planning, in writing, of your � intended effective date of annexation. This notification should be provided as early as possible. Please send this information to Michael Thomas, Office of Management and Budget, 516 Third Avenue,Room 402, Seattle,Washington 98104,and 6. Filing with King County Council of: (1) one certified copy of final resolution or ordinance accomplishing this proposed action; and(2) a copy of this letter. This document should be filed with the Clerk of the Council (Attn: Anne Noris), King County Courthouse, Room 1025, Seattle,Washington 98104 If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact our office at 206-296- 6800. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council Harry Sanders,Records and Elections Division Diane Murdock,Department of Assessment Lydia Reynolds-Jones,Manager,Project Support Services King County"911" Program Paul Reitenbach,Department of Development&Environmental Services Michael Thomas, Office of Management and Budget Q� . �l : �• � � CIT� �F �Z�TOl`�T �r � ..LL ,�" Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning J Tanner,Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator April 10, 2003 Attention: Julie Moore Bob Roegner,Manager King County Records,Elections and Licensing Room 553, King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 SUBJECT: FALK ANNEXATION ELECTION Dear Mr.Roegner: � Enclosed please find a copy of a recent letter we received from the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County stating that their 45-day review period for the 5.97-acre Falk Annexation will end April 10, 2003 unless a public hearing is requested. We do not anticipate a public hearing for this annexation;rather we expect a letter from the BRB dated April 11, 2003 approving the proposed Falk Annexation. In light of this letter we would like to request that this annexation be scheduled for the next earliest County election. There are registered voters residing on the annexation site and a majority have indicated their support for this annexation. Since the City's Annexation Resolution,based upon RCW 35A.14.015, was filed with Anne Noris,the Clerk of the Council, on 7anuary 31S`. 2003, it would appear that the next earliest election date for this annexation would be September 16"', 2003 per the"Deadlines for Adoption of Ballot Measures" memorandum we recently received from Anne Norris, Clerk of the Council. Please also find enclosed a copy of the original petition for this annexation, a copy of Resolution No. 3615 calling for an election to be held pursuant to Chapter 35A.14 RCW with the cost of the annexation election to be paid for by the City of Renton,and a copy of the January 27"', 2003 City Council minutes describing the adoption of the resolution. If you need additional information or have any questions regarding this latest annexation by election please contact Don Erickson, Senior Planner and project manager for this annexation, at 425-430-6581. Sincerely, � �.�- ��d1�1 �� Rebecca Lind Planning Manager Enclosures(3) cc: Don Erickson i'}-��nucn�un n�n...,e...,.:,...��c..iv�ne,...e,..a,..Ft�,..:.,.,i.� .�� ' � L � � � � 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U RV E Y _ � i - -� f" - Washington State Boundary 1Zezriez,v �oard For King County Central Building, Suite 608,810 3rd Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-1645 Phone (206) 296-6800 •Fax (206)296-6803 Apri12,2003 . r �.:.a �,� � .��-:.-, . � �:.::i=-�� City of Renton � Attn: Don Erickson, Senior Planner 1055 South Crrady Way Renton,WA 98055 RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING File No. 2143—City of Renton—Falk Annexation Dear Mr.Erickson: We.have received approval from King County engineering staff of the legal description for the above-referenced.Notice of Intention. The Notice of Intention is now considered complete and has been officially filed effective Februarv.24. 2003.� .Therefore, the. end of the forly-five day period aYlowed for invol�ng the Board's jurisdiction and requesting a public hearing is officially Auril 10, 2003. You will be advised of any further changes in the status of the Notice before the Board. Please be aware that any future final ordinance or resolution on the proposed action must incorporate the legal description approved by King County engineering staff, including any revisions made in response to the engineering staff review. Sincerely, � . Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council Lydia Reynolds-Jones,Manager,Project Support Services � Diane Murdock,Departrnent of Assessments . - Hany Sanders,Records and Election Division , _ . Paul Reitenbach,Department of Development and Environmental Services Michael Thomas,.Office Management and Budget � FORM 12 F.' j Y . ' _. _ �� •' • January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes � � Page 42 . and the existing City Boundary to the west(Falk Annexation). IY�Oi�ED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3616 A resolution was read approving the Liberty Ridge Phase 5 Final Plat Plat:Liberty Ridge Phase 5, consisting of approximately 11.4 acres located in the vicinity of NE lst St., NE lst St,FP-02-146 Edmonds Ave.NE,and NE 3rd and 4th Streets(FP-02-146). MOVED BY � KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolufion#3617 A resolution was read authorizing the Ma,yor and City Clerk to enter into a Human Services:Joint Human memorandum of understanding for the planning,funding,and implementation . Services Funding Program, of a joint human services application funding program with South King County South King County Cities cities. MOVED BY KEOLKER-VVI�LER,SECONDED BY CORMAN, . COUNCII,ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ: CARRIED. Resolntion#3618 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Utility:Apollo Lift Station, interlocal agree�ent with King County Water District 90 and Issaquah School Transfer of Ownership to City District relating to the transfer of the Apollo Lift Station and appurtenances from the districts to the City of Renton. MOVED BY CORMAN,SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. � CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Corman relayed complaints voiced by Victoria Park neighborhood � Transportation:Benson Rd S residents concerning the timing of the traffic signals on Benson Rd.S.,and in Tr�c Signal Timing,Red relation to that,he stated that residents have also noticed an increase in the Light Running running of red lights. � Police:Burglaries in Renton MOVED BY CI,AWSON,.SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCII.,REFER Highlands(Commercial& THE ISSUE OF CONIlVIERCIAL AND.RESIDPdVTIAL BURGLARIFS IN Residential) THI;RENTON HIGHLANDS TO THN;PUBLIC SAFETY COr�IlvI1TTEE. . � CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NELSON,SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCII,ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 10:08 p.m. � ��;�G� �' Gf�'��"� . Bt3N�I.�ALTiDN.+C�y.Cl�rk Recorder. Michele Neumann ' January 27,2003 . • • i � .� . _' . . ' . " , ..Y � � • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON - RESOLUTION NO. 3615 A RESOLUTIOI�I OF THE CITY O� RENTON, VVASHINGTON, � CALLING FOR THE ANNEXATION, BY ELECTION, OF CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON LYING IN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY THE CITY OF RENTON CORPORATE BOUNDARY, INCLUDING S. 47Tg STREET, TO THE NORTH; SE 185T$ PLACE, IF EXTENDED, TO THE SOUTH; 102''� AVENUE SE, TO THE EAST; AND THE EXISTING CITY BOUNDARY, TO THE WEST. (FALK AIVNEXATI01� WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, has determined that it would be in the best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton to annex the property generally bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary, including S. 47�' Street, to the north; SE 185� Place, if extended, to the south; 102°d Avenue SE, to the east; and the existing � City boundary; to the west; legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth; and WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous to call for an election for this annexation; � NOW, THEREFORE, TI� CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: � �SECTION I. The above findings are true a.nd correct in all respects. SECTION II. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would ' be served by the annexation of contiguous unincorporated territory lying generally in the area bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary, including S. 47`�` Street, to the north; SE 185'� Place, if extended, to the south; 102°a Avenue SE, to the east; and the existing City �_--. _ � � �� , �--f� � � - Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Central Building, Suite 608,810 3rd Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-1645 Phone (206) 296-6800 •Fax (206)296-6803 Apri12,2003 �i`s'� � �� L�� City of Renton -.- Attn: Don Erickson, Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way _ Renton,WA 98055 RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING File No. 2143 —City of Renton—Falk Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: We have received approval from King County engineering staff of the legal description for the above-referenced Notice of Intention. .The Notice of Intention is now considered complete and has been officially filed effective Februarv 24. 2003. Therefore, the end,of the forty-five day period allowed for invoking -the Board's jurisdiction and requesting a public hearing is officially April 10, 2003. You will be advisecl of any further changes in the status of the Notice before the Board., � , , � � . � . , Please be aware that any future final ordinance or resolution on the proposed action must incorporate the legal description approved by King County engineering staff, including any revisions made in response to the engineering staff review. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council Lydia Reynolds-Jones,Manager,Project Support Services Diane Murdock,Department of Assessments � Harry Sanders,Records and Election Division • �. , ,� .�Paul Reitenbach,Department of Development and Environmental Services , . . , 1Vlichael Thomas,,Office Management and Budget � �. , . FORM 12 � . � ` ��e OOLZ 3y2 aoa - ' ;�_ ooq�v � i/�'000 � g dD4`7 � °��aoU d a� �o �� , `�` o��vZ. � � 35,o00 � l�,�'�v`�• d/?lO � /�✓��p a OoU "` �,8�� O/�I� � Z�/��C� ��PL I��i$�q40 ��fZ�Oan s, �� ; _, � � � . �► A ♦ a �� 3�0� " �.�lo� ; ,,; , � ��/�� .03��'��-� 9- � � � � �� 'd � ! O�o � � o� �'�° . � � �t�I/ G � a��-Q � a a a�o,�� , �' � � o��j i� . ,��oo� � �3 ■ �. -� � � � � Q q ❑ � � � � , � Q � � � � � � ❑ � � �►r� � ❑ Q � � �' � � � � � �-.�, r�`�� r�' Q� C� Q � �'I � � o � � � Q � � � a � �=a I k �An n exati o n ° 3°° 6°° Exhibit 2: Existing Structures 1:3 600. .�Y w Existing Structure ' v�,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning ♦�`� SueCarlson,Administrator �� Existing Corporate Boundary G.Del Rosario ��NT�� 3January2001 - Proposed Annexation Boundary PLEASE DETAGH BEFORE DEPOSITING .•. . � CITY OF RENTON,WA 98055 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK N0.212807 1NVOICE Nl1MBER DATE � � ' DESCRfPT30N P.O.Nf3M9ER I]ISCUUN? AMOI]NT FilingFee 02/13/2003 Filing fee for Falk Annexation 0.00 50.00 , i . � i �� ' �� .�� FE� 262003 ECONOMIC D VELOPMENT, NEIGHBO HOODS, , AND STRATEt IC PLANNIhJG , - 50.00 ,�.,_-� _ , � I I 4�� -_. __ i� CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 14,2002 TO: Don Erickson FROM: Sonja J.Fesser`�� J. SUSJECT: Falk Annexation,LUA-02-019,A,R,ECF Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced annexation submittal and find the legal description contained therein to be satisfactory. �H:�FILE,SYS�I.ND�20\FALK.doc � .-. , � �, City or rtenton Department of Planning/Building/Puo�ic Works � ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: l y U � � � COMMENTS DUE: S:OO PM, FEBRUARY 22ND, ZOOZ -DI APPLICATION NO: LUA-0�#�,A, R �L� DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 11,2002 APPLICANT: NINA FALK PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON,AICP PROJECT TITLE: FALK ANNEXATION WORK ORDER NO: ] y CITV OF RENTON LOCATION: S.47T"STREET&102ND AVE SE SITE AREA: 13.66 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A ��} ' " SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed annexation and rezone of 13.66 acres north of Springbrook Spring��l�@��fi�d�l�6�g County's R-1 Zone to Renton's R-8 Zone. The site is accessed off of SE 192"d Street and overlooks'the Valley Area in Renton. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Proba6le Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housin Air Aesthetics Water Li ht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans ortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 000 Feet FE� � � �� Ci�Y O!= ;�;a'!"O�r4 UTIL1Tv^�>�Y=-�f5 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing.doc Rev.10/93 . � KING COUNTY AS � ESSOR ' , . ; �P6NToN ORD .�26B _I I .I� � w3T.�7 O 30 � . � � , � � _ � � � � � � � � � � \ a �GSP �� 0 91�`' o �' � o a.03 �o � �2 N � 6.3G, -7G o � h�h� � N - -- - � � o,TR TR N 20 N I R�• � �4 �Ao � �D` � n ��6 � � q�� o�� oti°� ��o � �9./5 �o � l40�.Go#> � 23o W �-S 9.3g N cJ E �4�b� �L. � . � '� n �i ,��'�i � ��' N �0.09 _ � iyo Q �!� �� G7.49 W�1 Z � "�R � ��U�a � �qa � � ,F�k` n o � 3�,�4°� ��o a� h po�lP . ��6 - 30 40 �9.9i �0•�9. � �v _ _ ,�r �-� ,o so � E �'33g � Rc. , R�• � �� NGPE � i-�S � � 2•6 � � � �� Na nvr, o �S � ( 7/ l�3or �GZ � �� 6��Sp oq o �� :6�j 0 D Z �? - o v� � � Q' �'c�.7 � "� � � � - ' �'.,3c¢c ,F ' °� S E I 8 i � ' �•� � � tii ��. � � � �� 0 e� � NGPE � 2 �5.,4c' �o �i � TR.�a� � ° . � 0 9 7 I � 32A� � � �` - ^ - -, R ��6�1'�•vd9•�'i•38d ul 6 36..j/ `,I � ,o �' ZG/ �G . 3/ /7.¢ n ai � Z9A� �� - M 9��p1 i� � /4 L � � ��Rb��b8� m�" �� -,� v � �' 9y � � � � ZgA�' B�ioo�3�,,�y°3q�oo � .9, ��,j 6 L�P 6a- - \ _ _-� ,0 20 20 G36./5 244 22�1 62 6.�S .✓4 f-��.,s,f E. �,r rJ a NB%-�/•3a E' 83� .✓af- so- .E ie.ee .f�1 M . �a:�3 � itJ..,f � ]0 30 �� o Q Q �� N � O � � � h a'� Zp v � , .. � W lot 2 �I` ��ot I a �, o� . o� �A D� p 0 � � �i° �'��a�`'y�� 6,B��c. 0 r � � h \�' b o Qp�� a�1 � q4 � ° � \ ��5 '� „��•s,ss,r i�sas � � N `� TR.D � h � es-.sa•ss� toe.a � �i NGPE P� ` S1.v..r.✓.,iQo�sJfi, s W 1+r� ^1 OI�, ` "'"''w'"s"'f* ,,� � � � arz �a�';�°,o•.� � � ^ ��yG b 3n �� KCSP 683076 � � 3 �, � 0 su.�r. � .� ✓ ,v✓ a, �, I �.� Q, � �,6$ �'�•W � 8403290813 `m . o � � �✓n•6�•/t� olJ�'�'✓. � (� LL� �i7 12 �I�h� LoT /��3 J 5o �5�668 � 0 �� N (V 22'.r �bo.8 S' �� '✓rf°r i��°�d"�✓. Z 3 t"�. � .✓B9•79•dG H/ �3It70 � �� 140.�0 � ��82 l .53 1�9�. 7 � �1 j .0 30' RD� HSMT. � Q ' 9� KCSP '� � S$9 S0354 � 910 081 9002,�00 3�� ^ i 30 � ° _ nig9_57-3Z�°�'93 Z� LOT 4 �}02' � .Zfr � LO'T'3 � Iq� LOT 2 �g� �I LUT I o�'1 `1,� �� $ y /z4.SS wT : (lf �o �� Q� �'uA1D.IIJT R �1� . C2% �4 °J �� ,�g,Q7 !O'a.21 �•',�?1' �� i28.6� p�� 90:39 �av 72 • cu o a R�42 �1A9 57 34W '� _42 �- � , h _ S.E, I 68TH ST. TRACT A � R=�,R,i �3033 � ��--� TRACT A ZD °� �L.OT .3�9's � vuo.i�Y. �Je�-sx 4ow z9�3. o � � -f� 75.68 /GLSA7 4l.33 38.3'� � 6AL vD � 0 �� `�o�KC P S89S03 9101089003� ,2 g W `3 � � � I 309_87 � ,P,o�4 �Z�"� �i� �� .eo�2�� 1 ��3i� �� '39 � i 589-57-3ZE 0. 0. ap � l�.a� � 1�5.69 loscn i4�ar� i.4co � � ; . ^ - 63s. �a � ° ° LOT 2 � � � � . ti � Q $ �,4� _.�n \ ,- %/U�� e''��`�-� . , , , . - ;:, �_ � CIT'S� �-JF RENTON ..LL Mayor Jesse Tanner � February 13, 2003 State of Washington � Boundary Review Board for King County Central Building, Suite 608 810 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1693 � Subject: NOTICE OF INTENTION TO EXPAND THE CITY OF RENTON CORPORATE LIMITS BY ANNEXATION ' Dear Board Members: � As required by Chapter 36.93 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCV�, the City of Renton hereby gives notice of intention to annex territory hereafter referred to as the "Falk Annexation". This annexation is proposed under the election method in accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 35A.14 of the RCW. A resolution.calling for an election for this annexation was passed by the Renton City Council on January 27�', 2003 and transmitted to the County Clerk and the Boundary Review Board. This annexation would incorporate into the City of Renton approximately 6.43 acres of territory for the provision of urban services. To assist in your consideration of the proposed action, the required articles and exhibits are enclosed and numbered in accordance with the Board's suggested format. 'The $50.00 filing fee is also enclosed. Should questions arise during the review of the information and exhibits provided with this Notice of Intention to Annex, please feel free to contact Don Erickson, Senior Planner, at(425) 430-6581. � Please send notices and other communications regarding the proposed annexation to:� � Don Erickson, AICP, Senior Planner Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way . Renton, WA 98055 � Thank you for your considerarion. S' rely, • � � Jesse.Tanner � Mayor 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 R E N T O N �Thispapercontains50%recycledmateria1,30%postconsumer. AHEAD OF THE CURVE -Z:*':a3'_",^' ".ni .aea;;u-'-sR.»•�i.�y,+.;a;.�.,.r•�a:<"i+; ;?"k.,'yr: i.a�;aA;+K-"a�k'9, °i,<;�v< ' �1.� <'�,' .n e.t .h gr.h�'. .? b'z t? .yP,.i �""�`:�X�3.k�`°�'f'�id :'.k".'J"' �'Le.:tr 4::i '��'i ��:'• �'�y�;.�i`..%s*;� ;�r i'��"A:!.,L',4�ny �Eat'lri,�t'iru�.e.`�,�"i,w:;-:2-..•Cz'�''>.4atti: �6'+.o.dn.r-.�• :C: p. �.>;: Ut-..p .,2 ,..�... 2•,�.�di_ �n ,.'4�a�;y,r. ,':p;�: .,f..,;..,�'{ ",�d:,'�:.-r�:i�'i�;.ha�}t;��-,:ky�.➢{• �::r't '( ,.m.L. °, s 4�.:�'. „ t,xi�, CF•. ..�a :,`c, A-.r'� l:d-a•+ e d:{+: $^^ #'.;., ,.,'-u tiE�;r'�„ •:tl+:•�{;q�kd<;�.>ro�;�.'n��:. ,x,� ",�. '�� .� a;t:1;,,�;�s. ;..:, '.> •:!'.i�i.�.l;t'A'i'F;:'';;:�.:�..e': .`,v 'l� j, z r 7. ,'i.. �.,�., .�S.i>.:= ,t3s �+..,a,;< .z.: ,�t.,f,.`�y ;�... �, .? �..ti)..� ,:ti?'.: ASH NGTON•`tis�: "�> ai� "-`�.' °�` "V:��:�,`:.'19=,�12h•4,.��:a;°t;�: r.. }';�d.�*:: ��:er;. ;:v.ac.. .>1., .� .t .�.a:d ..r.: a,:� ;�`:x,.>'r:, :�'U:Sr��1N�C OF;,�Vd.w.� y 'i�: :3 a'��.+a••:y:::,:at; Q:i::'.ti.;.'�..a• `�<•'�`= ,�'� .:3'. ;t;' r,�.,.x'�, �u��-4,.:,,.��:r: �+`4', o •w'� •.�..x,,..; ;t` s �a z.a� :C..:3ae;•.,,�.r�t,, ,.ra;.,.,,.;..; �.5 � � .-, . �:.' .�a,:.;� r,t �.,<v. .s�h.y. •�.. »S."t�.. at. ..°,^..•?+ ,..B�iri."':;v<.,.;ti":�;.«�:.':-•.a._ 7:..,f.r":_'"I��SD,r'r:;(;'�°e:'s��., `*�TC>. ::e:�*;.:7' .,�•„�.,,;::� r., ,o�',v�:�.��i,i.n ..w �:+,�``�x�..a...}.a,.• .�I;>:%".s�`:> f2EATON,Bi�ANG�iI`-�A :�:• `.F- .+. R'�>�_a �•C�;:"�::.;j:"":. _ ,:�,�. .k., ,,.v'. �:n,,.y.� q`;v .� :,- •�; :.;r. r'= :f',' ir: 6e. !c. .Y-i: ;6' s:�Y. �>;g&^ N� ��y; '.::.. 1'0:'.�'s, }� .a^ ��31, t°`:::• u ry' ��j :�t' �E... �� ;:i, ..x` , / ,.rt,:,t�;`7�'� r. '�6 tla J .:& ,^vu rk`..✓' v",.,..<�'r'e .? ;«+�'•• r ;s• <'t'' `:$tl�:.`!�"�:'V� `i 3. s;;: ^Ft ..�+•y. }v � /jy� s.• -`E` A'+.... ��' s�:,.. �s•, e r c�E'Kar..•'H'.a:;` �s +��.1t':"^1',. !`. `:T� :..h'� :ro,'lt}��4A 1.. i.; y �l�'% W�^� t �iY�,. ��:i•` e`,k« n �y d1n .:-h .1? ;.f �t^�4:qj5V� .��Vf��f.11Yt4U% ��'1<F :a. -=en;`., ':i^:"-"a� ,. c�.,. c '.�.��:-:,.. Ul� .:a.0� �,...,. .�>,. .s• 'y:s i-^� .I' ra'''A .�'� .t• "e. V� '�!Ritt�:d'.�... <' a=`•.-'. W?i-�, ! .. p�� .:�.. .�. , . :. '=s` .:r � 6�' . .: : �,a,. �. �,f _ „ ' � .��ri: - �'► �;r. `a`" r�_�„ St , .:... . : ..:, � ._ " ;.: ��p u:� „&'•��;i' "i ..'�`� - >:h, y.'e'• vr .. . . . ... .:s> .'t ' ` � : . �. :`�aF.. �.�+.. -h�, , � .•:.s r,... a.. .,. . . .: .. . �:..' _�. hi� �;. t��=��:�� .1!�:✓�,. 'a�`'}a;�.:�.:v�•'�.�ra.5 a �"`=..�Y-��ti:�:6 Y.�»:ae��`,�'�i�...�._..-..�i:.. 4'tie`... ::�.�.. • � ' =�.y��.,. ,.;U. .S�+} . .�,a."fi, .'n'.�f �. >V.. ..;! ..�'�.�.,,, r;<'$i'r.�:�? .r...�>.•'.,c='•' �.�...`° ,y, �`i : r..::..;..1.:,.�A'. � . ..,. .. .�. ;,.��..�:;.3�. »n'.ts':::.Z�!.. .4;.'re' e�� .:a�v:�.; ..r.:.w,r�.�Y .;a:. - - ..SR�z ti..'1 � ti-.y.v.?. .� .,U°c {-�. '_;r`,:� -�';... .�.q.,,•.:¢:.• �:;�� a ':.'�'$`d�.Y :ikpii,�F'k�t'Lit�t?et ,t .y....w.,,c.}, .. ' ..:..� .. .. .. 1- .: , �, ..��:.m ..,._. .. � . �t:;...�� .cv��: .. � .. . .; :� . , � `'r�" t.��%`.:..�:f 5-{'b' :::�:.,p �s.eC1�'a .C�'`c�.:'f�s` "'�•r�:ia .� :�.A CU�J TS.PI�IYABL��:i. ,c:�t�,?v+'.t. �;- '0 12'1�%20Q3:`;= �2'I>280' �� .�� ,,:,:.: �0::00;; _ ;.�,,. (' ;�•>tr..� ;;•, ?G _ �..,. >.y�:.,., �3„�f- r•a.�:. �� :�P�Q891;,4,3>�r-=}>:�,.�w ., �,.��:��:• ,�.� .�:.:<�.:z;� ! 'r si" ��"" •N�,*�.P� a' S�� - .�s,..:�a.4.q.6,' �';'u.: ,4.. -J'f� :'$L>.�.r x�.r' i�'�n .,j;.;r� .,r :: . , ; N ';"�., �:!,4..., .} . .. :,x:�'-;:��,',.�.:��,:':r :Y � ,� ..�;`.,. �:r,�':., ..r..,.{,: .a�w:aY�?�*�i��r-',.�'�..,.:, a).�, U��'•�� 4� .,aS�r° ;,,,z.,« .��' •-x �,��.,.,, +s. �>�. -,, '��^'�;;;�' �, .. A. �. .�:� ,,,��+ '��.t.. •3•s� -ti r.� r:.< a g �r�z.r�-�:-c�-. � •;�i*�-;;� .,�.3,� :;.r:;�•.II�. ,�.. � .3 � :�' 5;;5;:�.��tAG)Y AY„�.�:�:�> " •�ay'�.� ria:-;. i.;«: ',�* � r�''' �� ':',♦.- f F .{,•`''. 1��:#<:{.� � v:/=.;'�. 5�,:..t�. r... , �?��or..`.,,'"'?'•..v..= �r• .i3."wn�,`Se`• ;:�';.�,:`2:�'-`'><f�n�'FR..p•.t14��}:raS�G.>`�i4� 'b 4,�Si�T,�,,....+y�i;fe,J;��:Z:... ,.jl�;�y�: f,_'f�° L:�'!., '�i� �i ��) ,�9$055'�"a�.�+`� T''�' 'it:�. ��,v.�.,;�^..�i ;.�.,Yg ,.:f.r. ;;7a'aL?:,3•':�# e.�t�� ]+,..�i�`�'°�t��A';.e" �a: +�' S'�'i".S`:i��. �4 4. �.6.:' �ir� �YY �. �ISi. �''�`: ' ��4 � �n .1.•' i.i� RENT01�,` �:R a. , � � .� ,� ,��'_�� a:�„�'` `�w. E:`r�'�.%'S�� ti �'�� "`'d�:4:'��Y, tr ...rs.r t:x e. -r a.z1- ttS:rc> '�6 'aY"�n .b.. -�a. ttz;, tfi.�sy '� Y �; �>: r� .tm *.o tia.: ,`S�'{ j�� %�Js;.z:.t.'sS •:.s.c-�, a`� 't i�.�,.`::,�"...r_5��.$,, a3^,.�, �i t�t�.�S.,.'r-'"a. e�a a.�-.�a, f.v �,:. �'a :+a''r"� t��f �,. .a�';-:J7. .a"� �:.?+?.�'�, � {.o.;�Sva :'J:.. `-"r.;4t:::s.i,�pwd� ,r,...� %�«".�� :rr.. a r.",'i• b-$v^ aA. Jy,a�''• s•:r �, � .t. �.-, x a t�a.;�e�,,,, a, .�.:;; ''a., p�0 e•"'?��25�. 3b=�9184`�.�:��='s, �`�^;`��:ty..�c...;.x.z;s'.? .ay•;,- �. ,�-•.: �.s•z,�...d+�::vws:i'3v�r,c<. �„y.e....�kx:,'v`^.,� °L �,$: j � ..a;' .�'r;•a,,, e�:.5.'ka"s:'r' t":i �':r�r+' �F:.c_�:a. �;,,<:�.xy.� eArAN,�Xkr.'i i�n..: � -4�».2 .a e�t:_ '6� ,aP ��., '+..t�.r''..:..� *7''��,'�'�+ .T� tij�� 7�"7 �+ v ;�' .�;{ .`g. �.i+:..e� ±� ✓fv�,i- .+.1-{ .,•4;:' ':z• ��y':4�� "�:!%'h .S;uei. G.r •.udAP.d�F,,� �S'� p.VOla:F° :��l��+lJ 1:1�J';ii':S�'�� ,,.., .,r'. :'r.. .a.. �(.'�.� -��rJ�''» �.�,•y .'i` "Y;, .k?`, .a`Y '��•�� Ft... �'?r'P', .q,,7„� ''�. :f,`{.a�, .;>, ��;`:'. ::.,F., .�� .�5"<�:�e��: Y�J.'d,�0<. �i�i:,: .:ro�.':: �'� 1 N..ei�?e`^" ia`, ,f 8: lY'Y''.v.b':.r:',%`,;`;Y r�,Y",T� ef,"x ,�:;,a..aL�<..:> ��. „�.,._ ,�. 4f., �S� y�� .�•.:� .,�, .r:.. �L 4i,,,r,.a•��::r.. .s1`n�i''�,n'....F..r".�. .x�""��; - S' a'�`i?" ,'i' ...2.u`."r'r� p �4'.+ .7�". ..>ir; ,..e.�.'; �+ ':iy`� iti r. �iA ::;:r^;:i'.7'P ,a .t - "'A. �ii .rox vh. 1�t r'�.� :H°' s�5'�4 }'=i.:`:. a�.','sn6:'::-tS;-�.. ,�^'"� "Bc:�..5.:::.4:•.�e�.' .,b {'' .a ,.'w'a rll�''r '4Y.� q� 6y, .d 4,ry,: ^K:., 3 i�.�a�`,' y l. �_ y^. f� Y.�? ;,�" :r .4 •�' r:s. y'3��:� y. Y'.S. Y+. n'.�. 1y��p ::l'n...� r1,t�y r�i�.":.�:,:;:::�� .�. ..�t .:'�. .:�. , ,..t.. r,� s i 6;` t.:8. .k '�.:1v'= ...w..`;'>. r ��{.'.a•- �s� '1�� ,-..y:.. _ . S. i r� •_4` r hrk... .•.i^ .��fl o F':.�:�, '�{. �d"'r'�' `Y'!': M•"l� Yt. ��^.+:'S`. _$•. .Wi :t1:.`,•�'.='�:s.r' >.L�': �+'::'ti.. "3 .:�; t� -'t''�*...;•' '.".°,�: rY�` 1 'l 4. '`"'��`, ,S: >t .q�v`":`:n%.+.Y._:i.".. �:$' .i.s aa.�'. ``"g.�;Y? "'Y:.. �}, `'�• �•: f•)•,�e.::..' 1 .7.r.°� .a•'L''S. .! `(' ..F`.. •,g>�� "t', .,;�;:;:. ``t .0 ..�k- r.Yr� n •�S %�"�, .� :�:�:;>:.� . _ ,., w� . -�.::;!.., < <_. 9 �l.r:s ':;Y. ',� �=J>_� ..g"�rr'.+ •.s'-i.'.;'s..�:'•z,N''.;::•�''.�. �'i' ,,,y �.a...X.!' ..:T ::�YY f.,Ti��• :01� >{....�yf+ ...}.i.`>.":�� 2 er�':.tt.�.�.3+'?(�.14 'rJ4+ '"?'_ ,.;,. �r<, :7�, :�;� .�•r:�.. ,�.) <1" �`<:: ,. ��. 'vv.• r�. .x .f�i•S��.`} -°��"�' y: ^4�'.'x'�"Sx-. � ,, ( �. ..::2:�.. ,:4:: ^,.�.�.: S� 5�.� Y.• .\yLy�;. �! ...4.. �.�f,.,�.:� v{:�. ` � 1`r. �.;` '3� .,.� '�;�: � } ;:s;;'.:.<;' _ '.�,f .a�� .�:.:..e;:..,:,..,, •a•• c t��.�:�� ''o. 'n-. ,.-� -k. ..,�.,.,;:r" ',�.r.::`;': `•3:. � �:' 7 ..� "i� ::,'S ...,L': +ri •h. r')�.� �y., - :'.'�+.. ,.:7. '.��W :y. :,t '.�a ]� '�' r�sz'�`s.. .� - .�a �: p s��t'�s' •`.:'Ja�. `{r:':.._ _'+c-� i. F��r � .z '�t:: r.i ,3�"° ,.t�. _�S", aw -t `c.:, �e :, o>.0 ,1� ,��=a�';,�;., `ifi:N ��,:� �"� '�f1. x• :t,. « r-�' ;� 'BT+S �. �� r>q�i_ 'a .�{�0� a:.«Y '�: t. ��.�`��• �Y xF Kn.. �t. �'rY>: .�. � 2' �:�1't/'\ t�n .4'` rt�>•'s n ;g- •.y�.ii.?�;r .�,�',.,,:; �"°n+d�V §.'-1��. ..�. .h..; <'�d" :. ..�".a r t�:':h �` t�.` �.F. "t'...:SY;:;��. <r`'NqaT� :�'L .�..°�:: ', . . :;�s�i. ' _�"s:c' .. � , �:. g ., , • .�:..`b. . . .. .. �i�Fa;;....�:.,. ,,;,,' ...,�:� ...�...rv ?...�3...+r .. ..:, s.s.1:-':.. �:.-.t�:1 . '1....t': . ,�i`.i:�'i :iS.i ii ��@'�j f ..R� .4..�:. _ 3 ..e�n. {'.� a�l... .�. • \"['1. , ... ..�a., ,.. ...,S` ...-�. ...-.... ....,...� .. .•„'"q $.{g;.'::;;:.f%' ,',c•s .{'..1%';" .'3;[� ss,� ...�.. `c:::`':'� ,.� ..r� •.t..i.f.. z: :1< :�:,Ar�r'e* - i�i'.� °�°3`F>.. ..�'g n:::t.�?. .1?`?."' ,%..''�. ::t'`:;a ,.,rT�,.. ,�};�."�.r..r:�^'r., ...r,: a�t�.. .$"i,I. � 3�� c..y..; ;'r:.- i.,�, :'� r.r2}.�,� ,Qr,- =R':,. 't. "'+S� 1• k.:.., ';.iS"' �'� �, ��..y.-L-{�L .SS�''i�&s"�-;.:;`.'r�# .�,.�.'_. .:,+Z. :'..$]"S'�:. :d.::.i:.t�' .`'y`a'1-•" ,.r;-a•: y�[.'+': �4�ti'' J•"�a��.`,'.A'« t. p't ; ;`y. .i�-_d:%'� 'Y:Y� ,..!":. �:ti• :i-. `G`S�T ^a;:�::'� � .�'- �:St.i.f} ' iy.,,$.:'�,',:•'�,. .j�:`;�:::: .P��.ti`> �� :u.�R. .t.` .;.�:`�-.:.�y�Y'=i':. '•agryr �.,�i.''�.�:�.:.�.r:��; -�0-��.- v.r:�a .+• _,�'t '%N s:5;9s"1':''�+�`:'h, s`.L t..��`: <,a�. .5... �L Y�'� ..��k:. R6:�.>' �q •r' � Ar na`.�.t�zn,%. .<. ,�.@:;`l:is a ^s• s. �i y::'.:• yt�'�.r,; �+� "�Y"7.`r�`i� ::�c u:�r.�' ��''`,�t: .r a._ �fa: �:i•; i r. .�„ ,:c .ne.'Js+:�,}�� n.v'+iv' >.,r�;::°^i:"i': .l�W. G .i�"��.. =d$��:•� .x ,r r.�;��:g�: r.�°; 1� y,� �'�:•;:t ��.i.:. ,y.y'*,;:`:� s�::M •�4b.. 4.«,•z:: �._.s..�a�.'a''�..a.� �'�•:fif.��'>s �.. � w..k`P.t� " .�.?%'Yo.� ,�, ''".�;•. ,5",'z1": +f"•�,n. $?a'k:. kt,?. L i'i" ..F:>. �c c"s!?�ts'$ ^!• :i 'U',a .•:._., x ��;:..`iti: :��_:.,Sfy�r 1^�•r ` s�` d1N.s�:� .3 p._�. `rv"! N'r,Tt,n" �:.'._'�:q,.. .� �,'. ?3... r'�J' � �X�_ S;a,y 3x.�.. t��'� >.P*4» �.J � /�+�/� 9..iea .'%. ..�;3� :�.. Yi' r-�� a•�na �+.n,»<>:.P.�.,..•�n rs:%k,� :�.y+�b'd,�,7':'A:>oi:S"E• i •�� .7�ah 1��9.4}'. 9a'" �,'°�.} :�.i'F.f .t'�.,�.�l�i�N;;''�FF'S, 1,4. a _ -.t��L s.i'.'!': Ff ��,r:.s.,�sti •4-. ��1".;.C�i['n�,�-,_�� r2 ,F t �.:'f aS �i� ''�., �'� � i . ..,..3w5F ";'r`rYv r� 2' �;:i:�: .F..„,•.rtia':f�P;3,<:3" •av-t=&x,. 4t_r �4m s�a�..�. ¢, J^ w k' ; .Y rr�.r�� -r.�^i;�a'.:"�i'.�.s� , iy,�„ac�,q.,,.,;r, .�'k%��^aA�<` 'r e�--•m "zD�.;' '+"'�' v��, �:Q. '5� ,� . k#�- � �IGial''o,R",,: '.,�' y �• /+� ,y� y '�' .4 ;r.;:�x '��i: �o;i ,s 1�>.4t".s' y x .e';> [+` t�`."'abt�i�.�� .�:J�.i,b r� '�+� / ��"��".��..7''�- ��K'C .�� js': b.',ti�✓ .#�1`F��.� d: �Q 'i. �'y 4W.. I. id..{.r� p ..� t ��y �n�\I�.`a' �,'1 x'� `R,', p `f � ..t�i' •.Ri„Y��":��* 4�%.i::',�3 sf�^�3`:;;':r. >_t f:._,�:,�.�;kK,�til',O;saE:2�i'"o'N��'�y'y„4;�'..�� i; `'a.a•;cxs �t"5. ,��rCa.Y.ic,�1.. 'i;�ti.,a 'Y�.r_d?'ii-�rJ�j.`-:.>.',.?:&. u,5{g, �:�i:�h.i,, �.w H. 8�. .�. sa. Y a d 5, tt:ey�v ,y �Py� �.`µ. .,N'y � e�`�::.. ,k.n Y: `rm�.:7:e;. - .c.n `.:'1°G':,a;� '.��.-,�.. .t'.. ,-�.y,.;.b,�i.tt�;.�rC�w.}'.'�C•'�r'}�g�'-�` .?. �" -'�kw��i. y�"� .'��.,6u�„ .�Lugr+, r,u4�`°,., �,t�q ��Y,;'''�C;..:"" ��..E �3. r.x..,: ,�°Y.' 1!K.�Y'. .4...�.> ( 4't. � +�Y;<`, �`i^.Ye,'. °�h{�.�,v <}��'� '�: a ��;@,.�f «•` '3 2i- �.fS�r��7':'".i+f' .ck.�Sf: ..' � p^ p�``'C .. F. ��%' � .i ..a'i,^;�'��'`� LtyA � w�' ��3 '';�:., u, R '>'>:��`:��`AJ��I�I'Jr't`1;VeG,"�:qv"t'�ifXt.., Fg,. >s; `'w.A.y;�;,t'{:`ti a qt. y� .�.,r <""?t, '`�?.' `,r. t`_K: `:6,..,. - •^ir �O Dk`R`-� .,,,, t� -✓:. ""%i,.�>,;�?.��,f•T'" �';�daP.S3 W, p ��" �.?.:::.. ��j[ _ ,P.�'."� _i �F?:.. .�W :li �ti' {�'i7� t.� Id`.. d� Plti H ..15.`':��U 4��: .9:eY.o-.Y.� e'iJ �W.. 5"" 7::r �i'��i. >.<E=• ..Z:' '�i., �'�' 'a• :��;'a;'.::.:�ar � :..i'i�:<::�:'t; c e^ .�` :`�1.:.1/''"e'.i' -� 'tr.�:�� ,n.. �.;f;w.�:,.k .,}"C-- ,n' :»,'r,� :.si"yit.:>��.<, ,�iF>�7 �•;w S':�a�� '"'-="^h5;.'ti�,'�S.*1°`S'n,':;:.;:;:a:>:•-,.s.a..�.vV�t�<..k:..m+�%.��..A_'..�e,P�:.b - .;;�.:�.,. C� �e.'Aa981.0',4-��69�::>.��:,:. � f.:�xu,;. � '°�'=' .;�kti.,::.�:�-'t� �`F�' '�:�'�=� ,� r�.. <a;::�� ::'t;,:r::,r'.,.,-�;.� ,... ?°s,�i�"` :�c:�:;.�- ,t:� �r: y wy .,-a F.• N' `o.'. .:l6.Y., '3�.: ,� -.ss.�.-t.,�sa::.;" '%�1:�<:' ?'a.`:; '1^ -;r�':: ,,. 1�� '•q <x::. �"�;:� �'+�r;x:__ .�. > �. �EASfl ER:�t,. ,:.::..� ... _. ...... .::::. . . . a � S�' p ,,,.., >. �q. p� -�': �{:� it, d.C�Y� �?..,X Y.�.tg'' i:A,� .i^4":Y'A.� .� y ,d�� .:�a-• �'^%:1.�:• :fc+.'::n -tles:.fi.^`✓ ' •i' .J^ .:'1"TF �1`.tOF.-I: •S. .L��. .Y. :.`C' <•9� �.�y', �C� .( . �i.�}7':':'1?iA.i,�.:iV��..a 1 _ .. �9�i' ��':�.., :. : i ` )�. .:-t: .x :;�" g: .�i�."•`�'.x.c v`x% rST,� :v. .J• � :ck��.c-_ .h..t>. .,ty..�;,..s...: _Y.`%:.;..�:Zti; . ': • : � .::. , .,. ;... :.: . :... E;�..•..-•..,r:t ...:. �:d+e j::_ C.ni:;:.. �:E.^. � . + .. . .C> � .� .. .yt?.'.� �.. .. 4 �y:..Ma .....s ... ..:!•dl�'�..� :. .; , •�y a .:�'#}.. �':3.' :.� .(J.�:.!�. ��. .l'S:.`.: •...:. ... , . � ... . .. -, �' . . .t'r. ... . . �:.. .:. i:":`'�..�..r;"'�. ,:�j`�: Y}�=... .ir> „K: . .« .. � ,..r . ....r... ... . .... ,. . . .,.:..�. .. . .....:,f . � r�;>�.>;':-�. u _,,p.�.., , u�'.'":. ..y.,.... .� ... . .. .. . ,.,..... �.a. r.9 r t.. .. .......... ..tf $� g --..R.§:'` '�1,'a�, �.�..:t'e'.:._t:>>• '•i a:;�•' } ;3M.. s;�'.;....,;�; ,,. �. !..:.�L .. .,..,, �.�. .. .f - .� .... �+F .�,�;..� ... ........, ::'C '`1+�,..,ta ''}'_ .F. ..f. P ... ..... ... .. .i . ..;....... �i. .K. <.e§.� ,.-. �:... , .,x . .... x. .. ' ,A�`• M1.!""Rx ��Sit?i... .A`:�..�.h b.». ....�. .�^'C , . ..... . , -. W_ ... .. ... 1... >,.��,i2•.� 7 .:Y. .'tic � :�.4. -0 !� �"'�h' 's�Y^'C� :>�EX� ��6�:`�.<i`:.::;r..{;:'..'iJ�-'.��:�� nY. .:�'.,2,:% �:.q�s 'f.:.�yi:� ♦. .,.r. '�.(.. 'r....,z,1,s•. *.J:1:'r� �^^::a. t?.��'' �� ..r.r,, �z:.. :�. .�: c .�:. :�'.� } .:a..:>,..bf.+ ._�?� -•y �.+'�. - .�"-�C�«':�'I': S;� ::Y:�'y� ';A`:�r:e ;;'•d.'7f�"2�::"'�,.,. _ M.� YoL. �� .#:t;;:''>'{•..��i 1. ;�;':,ti. .�� `�r.•%'�v :�c�fiiY�;.`.' ''rt..t 'r:'i.�.., .�,,,. .:✓:':,. i.a :.b.:5. .a'€i .�. T+N ,.s .. �:�.r::.. .t .�� , '� t-�:� g �S':��A�.y:`::`,E'.'..;: � ,y },� Y "3i,,,v''.;_. J �-] �'f' '2'.�e•�:}�p.::.'�: .f'.' 1' f: ,�ii .�f'Ki''� '�':. .�`. �y�.. � .sY_.�:.��t J'tE:.:�s,.+ �,�'tFr .,�., < �f•< !*+�3>�F f' C,6. � �5j'::�.'c`h� �)�� f� `.f'��.-,r,a +! Si•) .b";{ "�'.�, ?'..8e'.�' t.: 1'� 1�� 'i4'��a�.9`•':W.1� .fl. "1TT'j.. .a�y .j:"$.�w. ;��';:''�:.'IjhRx�. `,(� "�'d .4 dYrvel'K�. ..'i.�'��. .tC'�''"��, r.�r..-d°,x :Y: .4.� �r,< +xtrx, a. .6tt.?, ��•y. .tr+�.y J�'t�'ri`;:':"_!''"t ,r"', :'4v.t "�� *.�'t'�`•::�,., ,r. =t d,i L�b s�' t - •.;F.%o,'.':�� '.x, a� 9: �}7,! ':,v',.�.[w3-.. �;: �i!','.�..ab��,E;,Q',,dg �4 m�i l,�v.Y4 v'}Yn.�� 'I:Ji� ,.\"S.F• �^d�. �..Yls" '�:+'a w'�e .'1''g�h.��•�'',w'��R .h �iy`ip.B��x.a a. .p,�� +s.SC�'%�.�'�. L" '� !,'l'a�. "',t�.uy...'.. n;�.i:i.w n t y::j•. e'�. .1�``` l+S;G�. e.4Y:�• '.a� .:Ai 'Z T. .l 7 1.1�J.,^.r._.k`:?,�:,�..:.:Y'• �:� '�p.".`°dp »Y 5':d #`.� ..r�`g,;. S''"�.,' . j^.Jt ?,. ��):�'Y�°e�. ''?.w> ��` a..'e:d`, `.R''''?,�� „fKY• .,�s -�r•�',,�t..�' ;:v��Tar,� v� k .,ytcy,��n.�v.,�,`$.•r^w[']i �`�. 1, roh° �;'a,3??,,�'� ?i+�.r"Cs�°�.:�Y` ��P �,1 r.t!..,��r,s �a =c'c�$,� ��j�y,k� 'e .y�'.3. ;�3.�'•'%@;a'£ '- '�:.'�"�''t":� x. ...;�� g� ;+�',,.�. ....�;`:;�....tl .h:� �r,t .z� ,'t'bd'tl`°�R' M�k.x «.ti'. y t�;v�i;',.a�,�. �r>o,..°�:,�Ca;w,}.�4;:.h;r .a�: ,�..��;'.;e. ;ap�'.,:'.:� F•i..��h. ...;�..a=�.�n��s?-•xa ,;,,•r�.�P .�,�, ;r�,�,.�a, ,�:^:;r ,�t;�v.,+,c��xr, .,�y4.• �Y. u'� �':�'��'r.'�`z�� :., :r,� �yi:'�f,P4•X;?'"� dSA•,,�vz;a.s.. ,.��a.ii�a�ti3;u:,�rr":f� �y�1r��.D�C. '! j£.c !.,4,'a -i�j�,�t... �^ (� �f j� `i��' �5„�.� .P°x�'.�?-s;� •�',-'�:�'%'��,.d::�'?N:�7�� `�;: ..�.M�.y�({.{,t,�'�'m.'Y3. ..:�;+'�t.^'k¢:'a�.�y{f�r�{ ,„�,1sa '��;}; S: .'r t x,' �:K -:(�; 4d.�'•.�,=�r�;��'G,' ;�°'�»�!:',��_�j i,�1�.,7-i.,�.n,v^ �.,+}` '�2 `�a `�;+'h r.as:�y,.,;;�'i�5 �S' .l"t'r$:�` S. .:S',.��„ };J.eS�g`Z�r'G.II'�.'i ,?if:,�8��'�Q��I. -I�'�.'r� �i�'�•O�J�t}yQ�d,'`i' F'.h�...� ,�r� L e.�..�.;1.i�,f��9vG'� 'fa2`:+�n��.?,�:�`;'lfer« 6S�i`tS..b,SYi ,�d.. �. '*^^«'�:t'�'�.''�°��.�y� :��:'*:'.�`e,yti,.,al�:��'J n:Yr::;�i,1;01''M�� ;�'�'��v�ti.r;t..�.�j:yr* ^e.�,�..t. �;,Yr3��,_�j;..�'ic„+�.; x` t..1:C�� s.th" ; .» tr+..a n�.�. �� . d. 4y- ;y��, {�k {.�a,a Yt :i1�- �k^.,�,.it.e,-.r.:..�^'-.t_,�r7i�P'_�.!;1'"' ro(.._.� �2�r.., �'1.' d-_�.��.5rmaa5.41. .;0.42...a'�.-llr . :.�s-�:�.`?+am:�',�:.:�:'��="�:�1-.:t,�._1:t....??a.,�:.:��_•w,. .�Y4r•4_��_ t. .. at_ .n.. �.a . � -.,z�3.. �� .�. �:�� ..�4¢'Lo�; ..*r.= .,<'i PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING NO.2�LSO7 CITY OF RENTON,WA 98055 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK . " ;x 5. - . ,�;y .;�., y:• ��,.�.,�-�, 'bn;:�^f`�hAMOUNT*. .s.r- ,�'•� rF' aDESCRIP'{10N- "is:s 'i�:-=r�?.O.:NUlu10ER;,�.:-n< ,r�t�,=.h,yfSISCOt)N�C'sr:��,'a'_ st'-:,'., ,:,. .;�1�lV`OiG£Tl1JNI9ER�`=;§ ;?s`.;,' �� ,"i!r.,.;;i:,v ,'%�"'�:':%: .,:` :' :� �� l:.s ;:�RtE•�, i't'c','�„''''. FilingFee 02/13/2003 Filing fee for Falk Annexation � 0.00 50.00 --� - '-:�ti.� A .i 3k:' :�.. r S.`.. S . .. .. . . . ��:1,�..4 . . � �.5.;. j: t a.�:. .. . .{J:^+' _ � �.�;^.� =t � . - ,�,%"�, T' �� ,��;•�: r� .,, :.�::> -; . ;.,�.;::;; f s;r <; _ _.. ,��t r. ,... .. ,. ':'<`: ;�,�.` _ =°•; _ ; ....r. :.. . ..' ��Y--�'+ �' • �a $1 �}� �� . .. � '. � 50.00 .; �; , - - � _ NOTICE OF INTENTION I. BACKGROUND/MAPS 1. The description of and reason for seeking the proposed action: The proposed action is to annex approximately 6.43 acres to the City of Renton. The primary purposes of the annexation are to develop under City of Renton regulations and oversight and to receive Renton sanitary sewer service. The annexation was initiated through the Resolution for Election method under RCW 35A.14.015, 14.070, 14.080, 14.085, 14.090, 14.100. The proposed annexation area is located in the NW quarter of the NW quarter of the SW quarter of Section 32,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., King County,Washington, on the plateau overlooking the Renton-Tukwila Valley. It abuts the Cit� of Renton on the north(S.47`�Street)and on the west,and is bordered on the east by 102° Avenue SE. 2. Copies of the Renton City Council minutes for actions taken relative to the proposed annexallon: A. Exhibit A: Certified minutes of the January 27, 2003 meeting of the Renton � City Council adopting the annexation resolution and authorizing the holding of an annexation election for the 6.43 acre Falk Annexation area including the 102°�Avenue SE public right-of-ways. B. Exhibit B: Certified minutes of the January 27, 2003 meeting of the Renton City Council regazding prezoning the 6.43 acre Falk Annexation site R-8 consistent with the existing Residential Single Family land use designation shown the Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 3. Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.222,annexations are exempt from SEPA. 4. Exhibit C: Legal description of the proposed annexation boundaries. 5. The following maps are enclosed: A. Exhibit D: King County Assessor's maps(three sets)displaying: 1) The proposed Falk Annexation boundary. 2) The size in acres. 3) The City of Renton corporate limits in relationship to the proposed Tydico Site Annexation. 4) The location of the nearest service points for the required utility services to the area. e � � J Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Page 2 Proposed Falk Annexation 02/11/03 B. Exhibit E: Vicinity maps displaying: 1) The proposed Falk Annexation boundary. 2) The size of the proposed annexation in acres. 3) The City of Renton existing corporate limits relative to the proposed annexation area. 4) All major streets and other major physical features. 5) The boundaries, including future service area boundaries, of all cities or special service districts having jurisdiction in or near the proposal. NOTE: The City and County library service area boundaries conespond to the City's corporate boundary. 6) King County Urban Growth Area and City of Renton Potential Annexation Area boundaries established under the Growth Management Act. C. Exhibit F: City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations. D. Exhibit G: Existing Structures Map E. Exhibit H: Topography Map F. Exhibit Io Sensitive Areas Map II. FACTORS THE BOARD MUST CONSID�R 1. Overview A. The population of the proposed Annexation area is estimated to be about eight. The City of Renton estimated population as of June lst,2002, was 53,840. B. The proposed annexation area includes about 5.96 acres,excluding roads. C. The population density of the proposed Annexation area is about .21 persons per gross acre. D. The assessed value of the properties proposed for annexation is $506,000. 2. Land Use A. Existing uses include what are thought to be three single family homes and underdeveloped land. No development of the subject parcels has been proposed to the City of Renton. However, the annexation is anticipated to facilitate development of these properties in the future. a � ' � 1 ' � Washington State Boundary Revi�W Doard for King County Page 3 Proposed Falk Annexation 02/11/03 3. Comprehensive Plans/Franchises A. King County Comprehensive Plan/Ordinances 1) County Planning under the Growth Management Act(GMA): Among other requirements,counties that plan under the Act must: a) adopt a countywide planning policy; b) designate urban growth areas; c) designate and adopt development regulations to protect critical areas; and, d) adopt a comprehensive plan. (RCW 36.70A.040) a) King County's Countywide Planning Policies state: "In collaboration with...King County.., each city shall designate a potential annexation area."(LU-31) The proposed annexation is within Renton's designated Potential Annexation Area. "Undeveloped lands adjacent to that city should be annexed at the time � development is proposed to receive a full range of urban services." (LU-33) - Development of the subject properties has not been formally � proposed. However,additional development on these two parcels is anticipated to occur in the future as a result of the proposed annexation and new zoning. "Cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to urban areas either directly or by contract."(FW-13) The City of Renton is prepared to provide local urban services to the area. Water and sewer service provided by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District is expected to continue should annexation occur. • b) Urban Growth Area: . The proposed annexation is within the Urban Growth Area as directed by the Growth Management Act and the King County Countywide Policies and as identified in the King County Comprehensive Plan. (see Eachibit F) c) The King County Sensitive Area Maps Folio. These maps indicate only slight to moderate slopes primarily in the northeast corner of the site. d) The King County Comprehensive Plan is addressed below. n �. Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County - Page 4 + Proposed Falk Annexation 02/11/03 2) King County Comprehensive Plan/Ordinances The following adopted King County Comprehensive Plan policies specifically support the proposed annexation: Chapter Two.Urban Land Use, Section II.B, Directing Growth to Cities and Urban Areas U-203 King County should encourage most population and employment growth to locate in the contiguous Urban Growth Area in western King County, especially in cities and their potential annexation areas. Note: Annexation and rezoning to R-8, 8 du/net acre from R-1, 1 du/gross acre in the County would encourage additional population growth within the Urban Growth Area and within the city limits. Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.C, Urban Growth Area Tazeets U-208 King County shall provide adequate land capacity for residential, commercial and industrial growth in the urban unincorporated area. This land capacity shall include both redevelopment opportunities as well as opportunities for development on vacant lands. Note: King County is currently updating its Comprehensive Plan and is likely to change the land use designation for the subject site from Greenbelt/Urban Sepazator to Urban Residential 4-12 du/net acre by the end of 2004. The Growth Management Planning Council has concurred with this recommendation and the County Executive is expected send it to the County Council in March 2004. Chapter Two. Urban Land Use. Section III.A, Planning with Kin� County's Cities for Future Annexation U-301 King County should work with cities to focus countywide growth within their boundaries and should support annexations within the Urbari Growth Area when consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan and Countywide Planning Policies. U-304 King County should support annexation proposals when: a. The proposal is consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan; b. The proposed area is wholly within the Urban Growth Area and within the city's designated Potential Annexation Area (for annexations); c. The city is planning for urban densities and efficient land use patterns consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies and King County land use plans; and, � Washington State Boundary Revie,.. Laard for King County �age 5 Proposed Falk Annexation 02/11/03 d. Adopted Countywide goals and policies for urban services, environmental and cultural resource protection will be supported. Note: The proposal is generally consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. The area proposed for annexation is wholly within the Urban Growth Area and within Renton's Potential Annexation Area. City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies and the City's development regulations support the Countywide goals and policies for urban densities, urban services and environmental and cultural resource protection. Also, as noted above, the County is proposing to redesignate the subject area from Greenbelt/Urban Separator to Urban Residential 4-12 du/gross acre on its Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 3) The adopted Soos Creek Community Plan Update (1991) has been supplanted by the 1994 King County Comprehensive Plan which readopted parts of it and other community plans in its Chapter Eight — Communiry Plans. This document states that the earlier separately adopted plans contain valuable historical information and other information that provides background for the policies listed in Chapter Eight. 4) The adopted King County Comprehensive Plan (1994) land use designation for the proposed annexation area is cunently Greenbelt/Urban Separator. This designation most likely would be implemented by County's R-1 Zone. Renton's 1995 Comprehensive Plan designates this area Residential Single Family. This designation most likely would be implemented through the City's R-8 Zone. The County's R-1 Zone would have a buildout capacity of only 6 units whereas Renton's R-8 Zone would allow approximately 39 or 40 units to be accommodated on the site. The City's proposed R-8 zoning would be comparable the County's R-6 zoning across 102nd Avenue SE to the east of the proposed annexation site. However, as noted above the County Executive,with the concurrence of the Growth Management Planning Council, is likely to recommend to the County Council next March that this designation be changed from Greenbelt/Urban Separator to Urban Residential 4-12 du/gross acre along the west side of 102°a Avenue SE to the Renton boundary and north of SE 192°a Street. 5) The annexation would result in King County ordinances and regulations being supplanted with those of the City of Renton. The primary ordinances directly affecting the development of the site are the City's zoning and building codes. a) The King County Sewer/Water Comprehensive Plan. King County Code Chapter 13.24, Sewer and Water Comprehensive Plans, sets the requirements for comprehensive plans of water and � Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County �age 6 ' Proposed Falk Annexation 02/11/03 sewer districts serving within the County's jurisdiction. The City of Renton has no compazable ordinance, since the City is capable of providing a full range of urban services. Further, the Chapter does not apply to the current proposal since such service expansions as may occur as a result of the proposal will be wholly contained within the Renton city limits. If service provision within the city limits by an outside agency is appropriate, the anangement is governed by a franchise agreement. The Comprehensive Water System Plan (adopted by Resolution 3361, 1998) is the functional plan that directs the maintenance, operation and development of the City's water utility system. b) The King County Sewerage General Plan. Renton's Long-Range Wastewater Management Plan (adopted by City Resolution 3417, 1999 and by King County Ordinance 13708, 2000), would supplant the King County Sewerage General Plan. This functional plan directs the maintenance, operation and development of the City's sanitary sewer utility system. c) The proposed annexation area is not within any of the agricultural districts identified for first or second priority in purchase of development rights. Further, the property is not currently under agricultural use. The City of Renton does not have a program authorizing transfer or purchase of development rights. d) The King County's 1990 Sensitive Areas maps folio identifies no wetlands, year-around streams, or erosion hazard areas within the proposed annexation area. The only feature of any concern is an intertnittent seasonal stream at the northeast corner of the site. The King County Sensitive Area Maps Folio and the Soos Creek Community Plan Update (1991) identify an unclassified intermittent feeder creek for Panther Creek in the northeast corner of the annexation site. Critical areas are protected under Renton's Critical and Resource Areas Ordinances, which would supplant King County Ordinance 4365. City sensitive area regulations are as follows: Greenbelt Re�ulations (RMC 4-3-070) adopts King County Sensitive Areas Folio, by reference, and provides critical area protections in addition to the regulations of the underlying zones. Tree Cuttin� and Land Clearing�Regulations (RMC 4-4-130) regulates land clearing, tree cutting and ground cover management in the vicinity of wetlands and State shorelines, on steep slopes and erosion hazard areas, and along riparian corridors. � � Washington State Boundary Revi�.,Laazd for King County �age 7 Proposed Falk Annexation 02/11/03 Gradin�, Excavation and Minin� Regulations (RMC 4-4-0601 provides regulations designed to minimize the detrimental environmental impacts of mining,excavation and grading activities. Flood Hazards (RMC 4-3-060) regulates development in flood hazard areas identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. Environmental Review Procedures (RMC 4-9-070) requires disclosure of and mitigation measures for detrimental environmental impacts which might result from proposed project and non-project land use actions (pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act,43.21C.120). Shoreline Master Pro�ram (RMC 4-3-090) is a general, comprehensive and long range plan to regulate construction and land use along shorelines of local and state-wide significance (pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act,RCW 90.58). Wetland Regulations (RMC 4-3-110) is designed to protect and maintain existing wetlands and wetland buffers and to encourage restoration of disturbed and low quality wetlands. Aquifer Protection Ordinance(RMC 8-8)provides protection of the City's potable water aquifers from contamination by regulated substances. (The preceding Renton Critical and Resource Area Ordinances are available on request.) e) Renton Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-345 states, "Officially designated historical sites should be preserved and/or incorporated into all development projects." No landmarks or sites of historical significance are shown mapped for the site in the Soos Creek Community Plan Update(1991). e) The City of Renton has adopted the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual by reference in the City's Drainage (Surface Water) Standards (RMC 4-6-030) as the design standard for controlling erosion and stormwater runoff for new development within the City limits. (The City of Renton Storm and Surface Water Drainage Ordinance is available on request.) B. City of Renton Comprehensive Plan/Franchise 1) City Planning Under the Growth Management Act(GN�A) The City of Renton is required to plan under RCW 36.70A.040. In conformance with the requirements of the GMA, the City has designated critical areas and adopted development regulations protecting these designated critical areas. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.060(4), since the City of Renton does not have a program authorizing transfer or purchase of development rights, forest and agricultural lands are not designated for long-term commercial significance. � � . Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County �age 8 � Proposed Falk Annexation 02/11/03 Certain critical areas are mapped for the proposed annexation area as noted in Section 3.A.S.d of this Notice of Intention. As a city planning under the GMA, the City of Renton is required to adopt a comprehensive plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan was adopted on February 20, 1995. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates land uses for all azeas within the City and within the City's Potential Annexation Areas. (see Exhibit H, City of Renton Land Use Designations) 2) The proposal is not specifically addressed in the Comprehensive Plan,but is generally consistent with the policies. Discussion of adopted Comprehensive Plan policies relating to the proposal follows. The proposal is consistent with the Land Use Element policies of the Comprehensive Plan that support annexation of lands within Renton's Urban Growth Boundary: • that are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area(LU-378); • where the availability of infrastructure and services allow for the development of urban densities(LU-379); • that are subject to development pressure(LU-380); • that are available for urbanization under county compreherisive planning,zoning,and subdivision regularions (LU-380); � for which the City of Renton should logically be the primary provider of urban infrastructure and services(LU-383); • that would include those who already use City services or who impact City in&astructure(LU-386); and • that lie within existing, emerging or prospective aquifer recharge zones that currently or potentially supply domestic water to the City (LU-394). No amendments to the adopted map or policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan have been necessitated by this proposal. The City is currently in the process of prezoning the site to R-8,eight units per net acre, consistent with the City's existing Residential Single Family land use designation for this area. This zonin� is compatible with the County's R-6, six units per gross acre,across 102° Avenue SE,to the east. 3) The State has reviewed Renton's Comprehensive Plan for consistency with the provisions of the Growth Management Act. The Comprehensive Plan was adopted on February 20, 1995. . 4) The provision of police, land use, and other services to the area by the City of Renton will not require a franchise. Water and sewer service by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District is expected to continue and require a franchise agreement. , � _ � " Washington State Boundary Revie:.�;aard for King County ` - �age 9 Proposed Falk Annexation 02/11/03 5) The area has not been the subject of a pre-Annexation Zoning Agreement. Pre-zoning,pursuant to RCW 35.A.14.330, is currently being developed for the site. 6) As noted above the adopted City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject area is Residential Single Family (Exhibit H). Proposed zoning regulations have not yet been adopted. An ordinance adopting new zoning for the subject parcels will be adopted following the Boundary Review Board's decision. The proposed R-8 zoning is consistent with the City's current Iand use designation and is compatible with the County's R-6 zoning across 102°d Avenue SE to the east. The City's proposed zoning is considerable denser than the County's R-1 zoning. The existing R-1 zoning allows less density then what currently exists in much of this area. Approximately 40 single-family detached dwellings could be developed under Renton's proposed R-8 zoning versus approximately six single-family dwellings under King County's R-1 zoning. 4. Planning data A. RevenuesBxpenditures This analysis identifies the General Fund revenues and costs associated with annexing the subject properties as they are currently developed,as well as estimating the annual fiscal impact of their full development at some undetermined point in the future. "Full development" does not equate to the absolute zoned capacity. Rather,it includes an assumption that a portion of the subject properties will not develop within the foreseeable future due to market forces and the choices of individual property owners. All assumptions regarding revenues and costs are based on existing standards or other comparable data,but actual results are likely to vary from these estimates. In general,costs associated with utilities have been assumed to be supported by the rates charged for those services. Units' Population: .. ° .Assessed Valuation. Existin conditions 3 7 $506,000 Full develo ment(est.) 39 97 $10,725,000 1) Estimated City Expenditures Current Full Contracted services Road Maintenance Fire Protection $632.50 $13,406.25 Police Protection Parks Maintenance Court,Legal and Other Total ongoing costs � � 1 Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Page 10 Proposed Falk Annexation 02/11/03 2) Estimated City Revenues to be Gained : . . .�_, ',;._,'y.. -s _ ;� ,r, `,': u11�: : - �Cur'r:erit'':.°: �`F ;�� ';„:;i�;;,,.:,... •'i� "�`. � -::�,),',,.,. i. '+' � `, �''� 'L ��1i� t,�, Regular Property Tax Levy $1,650.00 $34,967.00 State-Shared Revenues $214.97 $2,978.87 Miscellaneous Revenues $901.74 $12,153.54. Total $2,766.45 $50,099m77 Excess Levy $48.00 $1,008.00 3) The estimated reduction in County revenues would be $2,766.45 at current development. 4) The estimated net annual cost to the City to serve this annexation under full development is approximately $1,376.46 or approximately $35 per household. This could possibly diminish or go away if assessed values increase faster than expenses. 5) The estimated reduction in County expenditures is anticipated to negligible. This is primarily for the County roadway (102nd Avenue SE) within the proposed annexation area. Since the City and the County have a reciprocal library use agreement there would be no real savings here. 6) The area proposed for annexation lies within Fire District #40. The reduction in annual revenues to Fire District#40 would be $759 based upon an estimated $1.50 per $1,000 in assessed valuation levied by the Fire District. B. Services 1) Water Service The proposed annexation is within the Soos Creek Water & Sewer District water service area as identified in the City's Comprehensive Water System Plan. The following information was taken from the Districts Draft Water System Plan. a) There cunently is an 8inch line running u� 102°d Avenue SE and another 4" or 8' line running west on S.47 Street serving the new Sundance Subdivision in Renton. b) Water flow within these deadend systems is estimated to be less 1,000 gpm at the current time. The applicants will have to get a Certificate of Water Availability from the Soos Creek Water & Sewer District before any new development can occur. c) Fire hydrants exist along both 102na Avenue SE and South 47�' Street. � � " Washington State Boundary Revie:;-L�ard for King County ' � Page 11 Proposed Falk Annexation 02/11/03 d) The boundary of the District will probably be amended in the future to encompass the area along the west side of 102°� Avenue SE in Renton because Renton does not have sufficient water pressure to serve this higher elevation area at the current time. 2) Sanitary Sewer Service a) The Soos Creek Water & Sewer District would provide sewer service to the proposed annexation. b) Sewage disposal will be through METRO's treatment facilities. c) The Soos Creek Water & Sewer District's sanitary sewer system has sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed annexation area. 3) Fire Service The annexation site is currently served by King County Fire District No.40. Following annexation,the City of Renton would directly provide prevention and suppression services to all portions of the subject site. a) The nearest station is Station #13 located at 108`" Avenue SE and SE 172°d Street in King County followed by Station#141ocated at Lind Avenue SW and SW 19`� Street,in Renton. b) Response time to any point within the proposed annexation boundaries could range from four to five minutes. c) Station #13 is fully manned, with a staff of fifteen. Three firefighters are on duty per shift. d) Major equipment located at Station #13 includes two fire trucks, one primary and one secondary,and one aid car. e) All shift personnel aze certified EMT/D-Fib. fl Renton's fire rating is three, as determined by the Washington State Survey and Rating Bureau. Fire District#40's rating is two. g) Valley Communication 911 service is the source of emergency vehicle/aid dispatch. 5) General A) No annexation agreements are in effect for the subject area. B) The subject site slopes gently to the northwest. A small intermittent feeder branch to Panther Creek flows across the northeast corner of the site. The creek follows a small draw,the banks of which slope to about 15%. (Exhibit I,Topography) � , , � � Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Page 12 � Proposed Falk Annexation 02/11/03 C) The area is too small to make reasonable inferences from large-area growth forecasts. The City projects about 37 new single family units on the 5.96-acre non- street portion of the annexation site. This is based on proposed R-8 zoning and assumptions regarding access needs. D) There are no service issues associated with the proposal. With annexation, future property owners and future residents of the site would have access to a full range of city services. E) Access to the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District's sanitary sewer system is currently available to the site and would continue to be available upon annexation. However,mains to serve the area would be installed by developer extension. While it is assumed that installation would commence without delay, the City would have little control over the timetable for this work. F) Additionally, solid waste removal would be provided by the current waste hauler for seven years, according to State law. The area would then be included in the contract with the City's waster hauler. For other city-provided services, no delays are expected in implementing service delivery to the area. All City departments reviewing the annexation proposal indicated that they would be able to adequately serve existing and future development in the area. G) Existing services to the area appear to be adequate. I� Future rate increases for City utilities must be approved by the City Council. Rates may be affected by extemal factors, such as increases in tipping fees for solid waste and in METRO charges for sewage treatment. n The required filing fee of$50 for this annexation is enclosed. III. OBJECTIVES 1) Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities. There are no well-defined neighborhoods within the proposed annexation area. Sundance subdivision abuts the annexation site on its northwest corner. The azea to the east in King County is zoned R-6, 6 du/acre. The area to the west,in Renton,is currently zoned R-8 and R-1. The area to the north abutting South 47'�Street is currently being reviewed for a proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment that would change its current land use designation from Residential Rural to Residential Single Family,which most likely would allow R-8 zoning with densities up to 8 du/net acre. The existing Fredericks Place neighborhood along the eastside of 102ad Avenue SE and SE 186�'Street,in King County, would not be affected by this annexation. No detrimental impacts to natural neighborhoods or communities are anticipated to result from the proposed action. 2) Use of physical boundaries,including but not limited to bodies of water,highways and land contours. The proposed boundaries of this annexation appear most reasonable. Streets are used to define the northern and eastern boundaries of the annexation site and existing city boundaries define the westem and northern boundary of the site. Also, to the west of the ., ' ` � ' Washington State Boundary Revi,>:.��oard for King County -� Page 13 Proposed Falk Annexarion 02/11/03 site there is an abrupt change in topography that also makes this a natural boundary for this annexation. The current annexation appears to be a logical step in the process of expanding the city within its Potential Annexation Area to the east and south(Exhibit F6,Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Designations). 3) Creation and preservation of logical service areas. City staffs have stated that the proposed area would represent logical extensions of City services. The properties aze currently served by Fire District#40 and would be taken over by the City. Sewer and water would continue to be provided under existing agreements with the Soos'Creek Water and Sewer District. 4) Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries. The boundaries of this proposed annexation are regular,filling in a comer where the City of Renton abuts the site on both its northern and southern boundaries. No peninsulas or islands of unincorporated land will result from this annexation. 5) Discouragement of mulNple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporation of cities in excess of ten thousand populallon in heavily populated urban areas. Not applicable. � Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts. Not applicable. 7) Adjushnent of impractical boundaries. Neither existing nor proposed city boundaries aze impractical. From a land use and service delivery standpoint,jurisdiction over both sides of South 47�'Street is more rational and more efficient than service to either side from separate jurisdictions. 8) Incorporation as ciNes or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character King County has designated this unincorporated area for urban development and it is located within Renton's aclrnowledged PAA. Renton and Kent have agreed on the southern edge of Renton's PAA as being SE 200"'Street west of 108�'Avenue SE,and SE 192°a Street east of 108�'Avenue SE to Soos Creek. 9) Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. The site is currently designated Greenbelt/Urban Separator in King County but this designation is proposed to be changed to Urban Residential4-12 du/ac based upon a recent re-evaluation of this area by King County and concurrence from the Growth Management Planning Council. EXHIBIT A Resolution Hearing Certified Council Minutes of January 27`�, 2003 Documentl\ I . RENTON CITY COUNCIL ', - : '�°�`',�`��,-�';�`'"�� . �.:.. y `�:,�� Regular Meeting s "� , . `��_ � � � �• . . � . January 27,2003 Q�'Council Chambers , Monday,7:30 p.m M I N U T E S - _;Ren�on City Hall ,. ��;,,� � . -�-��: �u � . . . . CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag ancl calleii the . � . meeting of the Renton City Council to order. • ROLL CALL OF KATHY KEOLKER-WI�ELER,Council Rresident;KING PARKER;DON - COUNCILMEMBERS PERSSON;RANDY CORMAN;TONI NELSON;DAN CLAWSON. MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL EXCUSE � ABSENT COUNCILWOMAN TERRI BRIERE. CARRIED. � CITY STAFF IN � JESSE TANNER,Mayor;JAY COVINGTON,Chief Administrative Officer; � ATTEIV�ANCE ZANETTA FONTES,Assistant City Attorney;BONN�WALTON,City • Clerk;GREGG ZIIvIl��RMAN,PlanningBuilding/Public Works : Administrator;NE1L VJATTS,Development Services Director;MIKE � . ' WEBBY,Human Resources Aclministrator;ALEX PIETSCH,Acting . Economic Development Administrator;REBECCA LIND,Planner Manager; : DON ERICKSON,Senior Planner;JIM SHEPHERD,Community Services Administrator;DEREK TODD,Assistant to the CAO;COMMANDER : : KATHLEEN MCCLINCY,Police Department. � � SPECIAL PRESENTA�'ION Alex Pietsch,Acting Economic Development Aclministrator,introduced Terry EDNSP:Marketing Campaign Godat,Travelers Inn General Manager,and Renton Lodging Association � member. Ms.Godat explained that Renton hotel representatives make up the . membership of the Renton Lodging Association,and they work on a number of , � projects to market the hotels and the City. Ken Saunderson and Michael Hamilton with Hamilton/Saunderson Marketing � Pamiership,reported that the Renton Lodging Association's tourism �� promotional program,whose 2003 budget is approximately$80,000 to $100,000,is designed to promote Renton as a destination and to promote � : economic acdvity. Mr.Saunderson described the marketing tools used by the . Renton Lodging Association to promote Renton,and noted that one of the goals � in 2003 is to bring in additional marketing partners such as the Spirit of Washington Dinner Train,Maplewood Golf Course,and Valley Medical • � Center. Mr.Pietsch noted that the program is funded by hoteUmotel tax � . collections. � Continuing,Mr.Pietsch stated that hoteUmotel tax collections are also used to fund the Renton Community Marketing Campaign,which is a consortium of the � City of Renton,Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce,Valley Medical Center, ' Renton Technical College,and Renton School District to collectively market the Renton community. Mr.Saunderson and Mr.Hamilton gave a briefmg on the marketing campaign,noting that this year's theme is "delivering on the promise." Mr.Hamilton stated•that in 2003,in addition to the ongoing marketing efforts,the campaign will market the Renton community through a . summer of events. These events include: highlighting facility openings such as � � . the II�A Performing Arts Center,Pavilion Building,Renton Municipal : Parking Garage,and Renton Technical College Technology Resource Center; • the Ahead of the Curve Festival;Cinema at the Piazza Festival;and the Renton , ' Barbecue&Blues Festival. � : , . �.. . = CERTIFICATE �'� � � - ' �.�--------......:. . _.--- . . .._ -� - �_[, the understgned City Clerk of the � . ��` � . . � . . . . . . .: . . Gity of Renton, V�ashington,certify � . � �.� � � � � .. � : . . -- th t th'.s is a true and correct copy of� . � . � � . . � � � , _ _ -v -__ - _��7 0 3 ��. Subscribed � •. : . . _ -� -__ .� and seal�d thts,�day of�,20�� . . .. : � � . . . . - ._;-_--_: ,�3m1�:�'�J �Q�•. :. . . ., . . � . - - . City Clerk . . January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 31 In conclusion,Mr. Pietsch reviewed the budget for the Renton Community Marketing Campaign, as well as the budgets for the three festivals. He pointed out that the General Fund impact to the City of Renton totals$35,000. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORTS RELATED TO THIS SUBJECT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding the Renton EDNSP: HoteUMotel Tax Lodging Association funding. The Committee met on this date to discuss Revenue Allocation to Renton recommendations of the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. In regard Lodging Association, Chamber to the request of the Renton Lodging Association, the Committee recommended of Commerce Contract recognition of the successes of the Renton Lodging Association's tourism promotional efforts, and funding of the program s fourth full year of operation by allocating$98,100 in hoteUmotel tax collections to that end. The Committee further recommended that the Council authorize the Mayor and Citv Clerk to execute a contract with the Greater Renton Chamber of , Commerce for year four of the Renton Lodging Association's tourism promotional effort. MOVED BY PARKER,SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCII.CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. EDNSP: HoteUMotel Tax Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding the Renton Revenue Allocation to Community Marketing Campaign funding. The Committee met on this date to Community Stakeholders & discuss the recommendation of the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Barbecue&Blues Festival, to allocate funds for activities proposed by the Renton Community Marketing Hamilton/Saunderson Contract Campaign. The Committee concuned with the recommendations and asked the City Council to: � • Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a contract with Hamilton/Saunderson Marketing Partnership,marketing consultants,for a fifth year of the Renton Community Marketing Campaign; • Partner with other key community stakeholders for a fourth year of the Renton Community Marketing Campaign by allocating$20,000 of hoteUmotel tax collections for its use. This allbcation will be leveraged with additional fmancial contributions from the Economic Development, . Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department's "business recruitment" budget, and other community agencies, organizations, and businesses; and • �-111ocate an additional$30,000 of hoteUmotel tax collections directly to the proposed Renton Barbecue&Blues Festival to be held in downtown . Renton in September 2003. MOYED BY PARKER,SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCII.CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. PiT�LIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Vuong,Anacortes accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public fiearing Ave NE&NE lOth St to consider the resolution authorizing an annexation election and consideration ' of R-8(Residential Single�amil�+;eight dwelling units per acre)prezoning for the City-initiated Vuorig[�nneXation;-an approximately 2.70 acre site located east of Anacortes Ave. NE and nortli=of NE lOth St Don Erickson, Senior Planner,,renorted�that the subject area was previously reviewed and approved by the King-County Boundary Review Board prior to the invalidation of the petition process=of annexation by the State Supreme January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes " Page 32 Court in March,2002. The City purchased 1.125 acres of the annexation site as a future location for a surface water detention pond for the purpose of relieving existing surface water problems in the area. Stating that the proposed annexation area contains one single-family home,Mr. Erickson noted that there is no new private development proposed at this time. Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Residential Single Family, and R-8 zoning is proposed to replace the existing King County R-6 zoning. In regards to public services,he indicated that the subject area is within Water District 90, within the Renton sewer service area, and that fire protection is provided by Fire District 25; however, there is a shortfall of parks. Mr.Erickson detailed the fiscal impacts of the proposed annexation assuming an increase to eight single-family homes at full development, and a new home value of$250,000. The City will realize a deficit of$392 at current development, and a deficit of$107 at full development. Reporting an estimated one-time expense of$2,932 for the acquisition and development of parks,Mr. Erickson pointed out that a revenue deficit at current and full development is typical for residential annexations. In conclusion,Mr.Erickson stated that the proposed annexation is consistent with City policies for annexation, will further City business goals, and will result in no significant cost or service issues for the City. He recommended that Council adopt a resolution authorizing an annexation election,for which the City will bear the election costs, and authorize the Administration to draft a prezone ordinance for R-8 zoning for the subject site. Public comment was invited. There being none,it was MOVED BY PARKER, ' SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND ARRANGING FOR AN ANNEXATION ELECTION TO CONSIDER ANNEXING THE VUONG STTE AND ADJACENT STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE CITY; ; REQUIRE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THE ANNEXATION AREA TO ASSUME THEIR FAIR SHARE OF THE CITY'S OUTSTANDING BONDED INDEBTEDNESS;AND SUPPORT R-8 ZONING FOR THE ANNEXATION BECAUSE IT IS CONSISTENT WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION,RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY,FOR THIS AREA. CARRIED. (See page 41 for resolution.) Annexation: Falk, S 47th St& This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in 102nd Ave SE accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing to consider the resolution authorizing an annexation election and consideration of R-8 (Residential Single Family;eight dwelling units per net acre)prezoning for the Falk Annexation; 6.43 acres bounded by S.47th St. to the north,SE 185th Pl. to the south, and 102nd Ave. SE to the east. Don Erickson, Senior Planner,pointed out that the subject annexation was part of a larger annexation(13.66 acres)by the same name initiated on March 4, 2002. Since the State Supreme Court invalidated the petition method of . annexation on March 14, 2002, adoption of a resolution authorizing an annexation election is recommended. The applicant, Stephen Beck,has agreed to reimburse the City for the cost of the election. Mr.Erickson described the January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes ' Page 33 existing conditions of the site,noting the existence of four single-family dwellings, and a seasonal stream along the eastern property line.g Continuing,Mr.Erickson reported that the site is served by Fire District 40, is within the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, and roadway and stormwater improvements are likely. Stating that current King County zoning is R-1 with a GreenbeltlUrban Separator King County Comprehensive Plan designation,he explained that City staff successfully negotiated the removal of this area from the urban separator designation, and as a result the City can redesignate this site to a more intensive zoning. Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential Single Family, for which the proposed R-8 zoning is consistent with zoning to the west of the site and compatible with King County zoning to the east. Mr.Erickson reviewed the fiscal impacts of the proposed annexation,assuming an increase to 40 single-family homes at full development, and a new home value of$275,000. At current development the City will realize a deficit of $347, and at full development, the City will realize a surplus of$6,556. The one-time parks and development expense is estimated at$21,000. He reported that the proposed annexation meets the objectives of the King County Boundary Review Board and is generally consistent with City policies for annexations. In conclusion,he recommended that Council: adopt a resolution authorizing an annexation election for this site; authorize the Administration to draft a prezone ordinance for R-8 zoning; and authorize the submittal of the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board. Audience comment was invited. Reid McNair, 18525 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, stated that he favored the annexation; however,his property is no longer within the annexation area now that the area has been reduced from 13.66 to 6.43 acres. Emphasizing that he and many of his neighbors want to be annexed to the City of Renton,Mr. McNair asked Council to consider the original annexation. . In response to Council President Keolker-Wheeler's inquiries,Mr.Erickson explained that Mr. Beck initiated the revised Falk Annexation, and he guessed that the boundaries were reduced because Mr. Beck felt confident that the two � registered voters living on the site would support the annexation. In the election process,a super majority, or 60% of the citizens residing on the site must assume the City's bonded indebtedness. He confirmed that the Council is not bound to accept the annexation as presented. Mayor Tanner urged Council not to take any action tonight other than on the proposal as presented. He stated that citizens who are not included in this annexation, and who are still interested in annexing to the City,can apply for annexation at a later time. Council discussion ensued regarding whether action should be delayed until the possibility of expanding annexation boundaries is explored. It was pointed out that Mr.Beck might not be willing to pay the election costs if the boundaries are expanded. Upon Mr.McNair's assertion that he was willing to absorb election costs,Mr.Erickson pointed out that action could be delayed a week for � further exploration of the matter. January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 34 Joe MacKenzie, 18533 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, and Louis Longo, 18509 102nd Ave. SE, Renton, 98055, expressed their desire to remain in King County. Curtis Schuster, 12320 NE 8th St., Suite 100,Bellewe, 98005,representing KBS Development Corporation, stated that he is in the same situation as Mr. McNair, and wants the City to consider the original annexation. Fred Gustafson, 18439 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, stated that he resides in the proposed annexation area and is in favor of the annexation. He expressed his desire to be represented by the City of Renton,rather than by King County. 7udy Richardson, 18816 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, stated that although she is not d'uectly impacted by the proposed annexation, she wanted to point out that the site is on a dead end and there is no other way in and out of the property except by 102nd Ave. SE or SE 186th St. Both of those streets are in King County; therefore,Renton's fire and police personnel must go through King County to get to the site. Ms. Richardson also pointed out that there is a seasonal stream on the east side of the site, and expressed concern about future development of that stream site. Stephen A.Beck, 19129 SE 145th St.,Renton, 98055, applicant for the Falk Annexation,expressed his fear that a larger annexation would not be � successful; and for that reason,he chose to go forward with the annexation as proposed. Councilman Clawson noted that it may take some time to educate the neighboring residents about the annexation process, and recommended that Council take action on the annexation as proposed. There being no further public comment,it was MOVED BY PARKER, � SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUIVCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARIlVG. � CARRIED. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDEI3 BY PERSSOIV, COUNCII,: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN ANNEXATION ELECTION TO CONSIDER THE FALK AND GUSTAFSON PI20PERTIES AND ABUTTING 102ND AVE. SE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE CITY; CONDTTION THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE ANNEXATION ON PROPERTY OWNEI�S WTTHII�i THE ANNEXATIOIV AREA ASSUMING THEIR FAIR SHARE OF THE CITY'S OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS;REQUII2E THE APPLICANT TO REIlVVIBURSE THE CITY FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH HOLDING THE ELECTION; SUPPORT R-8 PI�EZONING FOR THE STTE;AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO SUBMIT THE NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. (See page 41 for resolution.) Council President Keolker-Wheeler encouraged those citizens interested in annexing to the City of Renton to contact City staff. Planning: Downtown Core This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Off-Street Parking accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing Requirements to consider the proposed amendments to the Downtown Core off-street parking � requirements. Don Erickson, Senior Planner,explained that the 83-acre Downtown Core area is currently exempt from all parking requirements and parking,when imposed, � January 27,2003 � Renton City Council Minutes Page 35 is required as mitigation through the SEPA(State Environmental Policy Act) process. The proposed amendments are recommended for the following reasons: SEPA imposed parking lacks predictability or standards;minimum off-street parking standards are needed to improve predictability and to replace parking lost to new development; and high occupancy uses generate a disproportionate demand for parking(dance clubs,dance halls, theaters, and churches). Stating that the proposed new urban(city center) standards provide for greater flexibility and protect existing buildings from becoming non-confomung uses, Mr.Erickson pointed out that the additional parking demand can be partially met through better management of the on-street pazking supply. He reported that upon review of other jurisdiction's parking standards,it was deternuned that parking can be reduced significantly in urban centers served by good public, transit and pedestrian friendly streets. Mr.Erickson noted that smaller sized cities with good transit and pedestrian friendly streets found lower parking ratios adequate. Continuing,Mr.Erickson reviewed the City Code amendments proposed for the Downtown Core which include residential and commercial uses, and assembly and high occupancy uses. He noted that existing commercial and residential uses would continue to be exempt from the City's parking provisions as long as they do not expand in size. If an existing building's use is expanded through an addition to the building,pazking is only required for that addition. Mr. Erickson stated that staff recommends approval of the proposed City Code amendments to Sections 4-4-080B,4�-080E, and 4-4-080F.10.e of the Parking, �f Loading,and Driveway Regulations. Audience comment was invited. There being none,it was MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. (See page 40 for Planning& Development Committee report.) ADMIlVISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer 7ay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2003 and beyond. Items noted included: � Mayor Tanner's recently delivered 2003 State of the City address is available on the City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us and will also be cablecast on cable channe121 in early February. � Valley Community Players presents Dial "M"forMurder at Carco Theatre, from January 31st through February 23rd. � The new traff'ic signals along S. 2nd St. are now in operation. These signals include a signal arm extending over the intersections,thereby improving visibility of the signals and traffic safety. � City of Tukwila staff has verbally informed Renton that the opening of S. 180th St./SW 43rd St. will occur in July rather than May,2003. A7LS: 2003 State of the City Councilman Corman commended Mayor Tanner on his 2003 State of the City . Address,Mayor's Presentation address,noting that it is an honor to be part of the work that was presented. r. , January 27,2003 -- Renton City Council Minutes � � Page.36 AUDIENCE COMMENT John Gasser,315 Williams Ave.N.,Renton, 98055, stated that he is co-owner Citizen Comment: Gasser— of The Met Coffee&Wine Bar located at 232 Burnett Ave. S., and he leases The Met Coffee&Wine Bar, the space for his business from the building's owner,Don Dally. Prior to Renton Transit Center leasing space at that location,Mr. Gasser said he was under the impression that Espresso Stand there were no plans for other coffee or wine shops in the immediate area. He soon discovered that another coffee shop was to operate at the Renton Transit Center, and that it was apparently being subsidized by the City of Renton. 1VIr. Gasser claimed that this was an unfair business practice,pointing out that his business is suffering due to construction in the azea and he is trying to find ways to survive during this hard time. Mr. Gasser reviewed his past dealings with City staff in regards to this matter, as well as the terms of the agreement that the City has with the owner's of the coffee shop. He asked the City to investigate the matter,including an audit of the coffee shop,to deternune if this is an unfair business practice. Mayor Tanner confirmed that the Ciry has a contract with the owners of the espresso stand,and that the owners secure and maintain the public restroom located at the transit�center. Noting that the contract was entered into prior to the opening of The Met Coffee&Wine Bar,Mayor Tanner stated that the Administration has no intention of invalidating the contract unless they fail to maintain the restrooms. He said that the City will request an audit of the concession, and continue to look into the matter. Citizen Comment: Maple— Chris Maple,co-owner of The Met Coffee&Wine Bar, 315 Williams Ave.N., The Met Coffee&Wine Bar, Renton,98055, stated that the City did not go out to bid on this project,and Renton Transit Center pointed out that the contract is an extension of an existing contract the City has Espresso Stand with the coffee shop owners for operating the City Scene Cafe at City Hall. She expressed her disappointment that no one else was given an opportunity to � be considered to operate a coffee shop at the Renton Transit Center. Ms.Maple stated that her business is suffering,and feels that one reason for this is the competition from the purported City-subsidized coffee shop. Mr. Gasser added that he is also concemed about future agreements for leased space in City-owned facilities such as the Renton Municipal Parking Garage, and commented that had he lrnown about the coffee shop,he might have . developed a different business�lan. Responding to Councilman Corman's inquiry regarding the duration of the contract,Community Services Administrator 7im Shepherd stated that the five- year contract was entered into on October 1,2001. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCII. REFER THE RENTON TRANSIT CENTER ESPRESSO STAND CONTRACT AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION TO THE FINANCE COMMTfTEE. CARRIED. Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington stated that the City recognizes the investments Don Dally has made in the downtown area, and emphasized that the City never intended to undernune or undercut his ability to lease space in that azea. The City intends to lease space at the Pavilion Building and the Renton Municipal Parking Garage in accordance with market rates. He added � ' that the contract provides the City with a service that was needed in that area. Councilwoman Nelson stated that there has always been a need for public restrooms in the downtown area,and a public restroom was included as part of �-. . ,. , . . January 27,2003 � Renton City Council Minutes Page 37 the construction of the transit center. She noted that the espresso stand owners provide a public service by taking care of the restroom. Mr. Shepherd confirmed that King County.built the Renton Transit Center, and - that the Council authorized tenant improvements in the amount of$18,000 for the espresso stand. Citizen Comment: Johnson— Arland"Buzz"Johnson, 334 Wells Ave. S.,#221,Renton, 98055,expressed his Puget Sound Energy frustration with Puget Sound Energy in his efforts to find out if there is a plan in place to prevent future power outages in downtown Renton. Mayor Tanner aclrnowledged Mr.7ohnson's concems regarding power outages,noting that they do occasionally occur. In addition,Mr,7ohnson extolled the benefits of living in downtown Renton, including the easy access to public transportation. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of January 13,2003. Council concur. January 13,2003 Community Services: Veterans Administrative,Judicial and Legal Services Department recommended approval Memorial Park Naming to name the park site dedicated for a veteran's memorial at the corner of Main Ave. S. and S. 3rd St. "Veterans Memorial Park," as recommended by the Park Board. Refer to Community Services Committee. Plat:Liberty Ridge Phase 5, Development Services Division recommended approval,with conditions, of the NE lst St,FP-02-146 Liberty Ridge Phase 5 Final Plat;78 single-family lots on 11.4 acres located north of NE lst St., south of NE 3rd and 4th Streets,and east of Edmonds Ave. NE(FP-02-146). Council concur. (See page 42 for resolution.) Development Services: Development Services Division recommended acceptance of the dedication of Kendall Court Short Plat, additional right-of-way of a six foot strip of land along NE 20th Pl. to fulfill a ROW Dedication at NE 20th requirement of the Kendall Court Short Plat(SHP-01-025). Council concur. Pl,SHP-01-025 Development Services: Development Services Division recommended approval of an ordinance Uniform Codes Adoption adopting the 1999 National Electric Code,2000 Uniform Plumbing Code,2001 Washington State Energy Code,and 2000 Washington State Ventilation& Indoor Air Quality Code. Refer to Plannin�&Development Committee. Human Resources: Deputy Human Resources and Risk Management Department recommended approval Fire Chief Position Salary to increase the salary of the Deputy Fire Chief position to salary grade m45 Increase to Grade m45 (monthly salary range$7,315 to$8,913)effective 7anuary 1,2003; and to place the two current incumbents at Step E. Refer to Finance Committee. Human Resources: 2003 Human Resources and Risk Management Department recommended approval Claims Processing Fee of the 2003 fee schedule for medical,dental, and prescription claims processing Schedule(Medical,Dental & by Healthcare Management Administrators and Pharmaceutical Card Service in Prescription) the approximate amount of$190,000. Refer to Finance Coinmittee. Legal: Auto Theft Tools Legal Division recommended adoption of an ordinance that amends Renton's penal code to make it illegal to make or possess auto theft tools. Refer to � • Public Safety Committee. Police: Crime Analyst Hire at Police Department recommended filling the newly approved Crime Analyst Step E position at Step E of the salary grade. Refer to Finance Committee. • ;:., January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes � Page 38 . Transportation: Puget Sound Transportation Systems Division recommended approval to pay the Puget Energy Street Lighting Back Sound Energy street lighting back bill in the amourit of$42,682. Refer to Bill Finance Committee. CAG: 02-161,Seneca Ave Water Utility Division submitted CAG-02-161,Seneca Ave.NW and NW 2nd NW/NW 2nd St Water Main St.Water Main Replacement;and requested approval of the project, Replacement,B&L Utility authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$12,974.40, commencement of 60-day lien period,and release of retained amount of $8,973.94 to B &L Utility,Inc.,contractor,if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Sanford E.Webb, 1129 167th St. SW, Citizen Comment: Webb— Lynnwood, 98037,regazding the proposed fence height regulations. He Fence Height Regulations expressed concerns regarding the use of six-foot-high solid board fences,fence screening requirements, and the proposed Special Administrative Fence Permit. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WE�ELER,SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD�USINESS Council President Keolker-Wheeler presented a report regarding the pilot Committee of the Whole project with South King County cities to consolidate the human services Human Services: Joint Human application and funding process. The Committee recommended concunence Services Funding Program, with the staff recommendation that Council approve the resolution authorizing South King County Cities the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the memorandum of understanding for planning,funding,and implementation of a joint human services application and funding program. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY �. NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 42 for resolution.) WSDOT: SR-167 Springbrook Council President Keolker-Wheeler reported receipt of two letters regarding the Creek Culvert Replacement closure of SR-167 for the replacement of the Springbrook Creek Culvert. One Project is a copy of a letter from the Renton Board of Public Works Acting Chairman, Dave Christensen,addressed to the Laura Musso-Escude at the Washington State Department of Transportation; and the other is from Bjom Bayley and Anders Berglund,IKEA owners,600 SW 43rd St.,Renton,98055. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WI�ELER,SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THESE ITEMS OF CORRESPONDENCE TO THE TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION)COMMTTTEE. CARRIED. Council:Workshop Report Council President Keolker-Wheeler presented a report on the four-hour Council (1/21/2003) workshop that occurred on January 21,2003. The goal of the workshop was to work through some issues that require Council discussion in advance of the annual CounciUstaff retreat, thus allowing staff time to prepare responses to those issues for discussion at the retreat. Ms. Keolker-Wheeler noted that as with all meetings of the City Council,this meeting was open to the public. However,public comment was not allowed,as it was a Council workshop session. � Ms. Keolker-Wheeler summarized the issues discussed at the workshop which were as follows: Council electronic mail; communications; historic issues; leasing policies;The Boeing Company and Explore Life project;roles and responsibilities;budget; temporary signage; the West Hill area in relation to . � ' . January 27,2003 `" Renton City Council Minutes Page 39 Renton's Potential Annexation Area; the City's cable channe121;property taxes; and the Renton Community Marketing Campaign. In addition, she reported that several items pertaining to the way Council interacts with staff were also referred to the upcoming CounciUstaff retreat. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending that City Finance:Finance Analyst II Council approve filling the regular Finance Analyst II position at Grade 13, Hire at Step D Step D, with the incumbent limited term Finance Analyst II,Dawna Truman. MOVED BY PARKER,SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance: Vouchers Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of Claim Vouchers 211612-211979 and two wire transfers totaling � $2,730,112.30;and approval of Payroll Vouchers 42342-42560, one wire transfer and 558 direct deposits totaling$1,787,051.45. MOVED BY PARKER,SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMTTTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation(Aviation) Transportation(Aviation) Committee Chair Persson presented a report Committee regarding the S.Grady Way westbound concrete approach to Rainier Ave. The Transportation: S Grady, westbound approach of S. Grady Way to the intersection of Rainier Ave. has Way/Rainier Ave S Pavement experience serious rutting and shoving of asplialt out of the wheel paths onto Rehab Design,Entranco the adjacent C-curb and sidewalk. As an interim fix, to keep the approach safe and open to the traveling public, and to allow time to design and construct the permanent solution,this intersection was overlaid as part of the 2002 Overlay - project. The permanent solution is to construct the final,approximately 550 feet of the westbound approach of S. Grady Way to Rainier Ave. with concrete. Council previously approved the 2003-2008 Transportation Improvement Program(TIP),which budgeted$620,000 for the design and construction of this project. The consultant agreement between the City and Entranco,Inc.is in the amount of$53,504.46 which,when executed,will allow the design of this project to commence. Construction ad is expected in Apri12003. The Committee recommended that Council accept the S. Grady Way Westbound Concrete Approach to Rainier Ave.project, and authorize the Mavor and Cit�Clerk to execute the agreement with Entranco,Inc.,in the amount of$53,504.46. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMNIITTEE REPORT.* In response to Councilman Parker's inquiry regarding the construction schedule, . Councilman Persson reported that construction of the project will begin in April and should be completed by this summer. *MOTION CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report regarding the request by Utility: Sewer Connection Roderick Williams for sewer connection to his properties located outside the Request for Property Outside City limits. The Committee recommended concunence in the recommendation City Limits,Williams of staff that Section 4-6-040C of City Code be amended to allow owners of multiple existing legal lots to.connect to the City's sewer system,if so authorized by the Renton City Council. The proposed amendment affects only those portions of the City's sewer service area and those portions within its � adopted Special Assessment District(SAD)boundaries that lie outside of the City's Potential Annexation Area(PAA). Existing legal lots lying within both the City's PAA and within the City's sewer service area shall still adhere to existing Code Section 4-6-040C:1.d regarding provision of service. . January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes � Page 40 The Committee also recommended that the ordinance regarding the proposed amendment be presented for first reading upon its introduction. Upon passage of the ordinance, the Committee further recommended approval for sewer connection outside the City limits by Mr.Williams, to connect three existing lots that are within the City's existing SAD boundary for 80th Ave. S.,but outside of its PAA.* , In response to Mayor Tanner's question whether the West Hill area water and sewer district's(Skyway Water and Sewer District)plans to extend its sewer service area to encompass the subject properties has been completed, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman reported that the district has agreed to extend its service;however,the City has not yet received a formal agreement. In response to Councilman Parker's inquiry as to what current City Code allows,Mr. Zimmerman stated it allows sewer service connection outside the City limits to a preexisting single-family lot, and the proposed amendment allows connection to multiple existing lots. *MOVED BY CORMAN,SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEEL�R, COLTNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utility: Apollo Lift Station, Utilities Committee Chair Cormari presented a report regarding the transfer of Transfer of Ownership to City ownership of the Apollo Lift Station. The Committee concuned in the recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department that Council approve the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement for the transfer of sewer facilities, which allows for the transfer of the Apollo Lift Station,to Renton. MOVED BY CORMAN,SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCII,CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. � CARRIED. (See page 42 for resolution.) Plannin� &Development Planning and Development Committee Vice Chair Clawson presented a report Committee regarding big-box retail use in the Center Office Residential(COR)3 Zone. Planning: Center Office The Committee met on 7anuary 16th to review the proposed zoning text Residential3 Zone,Big-Box amendment to add big-box retail use to the COR 3 Zone. The Committee Retail recommended adoption of the Planning Commission recommendation adding this use, subject to Note#71, "Big-box retail to be permitted in the COR 3 Zone,east of Garden Ave.N. and north of N. 8th St." The Committee further recommended that a public hearing regazding this matter be set on February 10, 2003. � The Committee also raised the issue of how wireless communication facilities are permitted in the COR 3 Zone,noting that future mapping of this zone in areas within the Employment Area-Transition Comprehensive Plan designation could lead to development with both residential and commercial activity, including wireless communication. The Committee concurred that this issue requires additional review and recommended that it be referred to the Title IV (Development Regulations)docket amendment process for analysis of how wireless facilities are treated in all mixed use zones. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNC]L CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. � Planning: Downtown Core Planning and Development Committee Vice Chair Clawson presented a report Off-Street Parking regarding the Downtown Core off-street parking requirements. The Committee Requirements met to review the ordinance changes for the current parking-exempt Downtown i �, ,`- -`� . January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 41 Core area, and recommended that Council support the following amendments to the parking requirements for the Downtown Core: 1. Allow exemptions to transfer to new uses and changes of uses occupying existing square footage. 2. Establish a new minimum standard for new residential uses of one space per unit within the Core. 3. Increase the standard for low-income elderly housing to 1.0 space per each three units(0.33 spaces/unit). 4. Establish a new standard for new commercial uses of 1.0 space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for most commercial uses. 5. Establish a new standard of 1.0 space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for restaurants and 5.0 spaces for stacking for each station. 6. Adopt existing Citywide standards for most recreational and entertainment uses with the follow exceptions: a. A new standard of 15 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross � floor area for dance halls,dance clubs, and skating rinks. 7. Adopt a new standard for religious institutions of 1.0 space for each five seats in the main auditorium,provided that spaces for any church shall not be less than ten spaces. For all existing religious institutions enlarging the seating capacity of their auditoriums, 1.0 additional parking space shall be provided for each five additional seats provided by the new construction, or ten spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area without fixed seats. For all churches making structural alterations or additions,which do not increase the seating capacity of the auditorium,see "outdoor and indoor sports arena, auditoriums, stadiums,places of public assembly,movie theaters, and entertainment clubs." 8. Allow parking to be provided off-site within the Downtown Core without distance limitations. MOVED BI'CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE CONIlVIITTEE REPORT. CARR�D. ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3614 A resolution was read calling for the annexation,by election, of contiguous Annexation: Vuong,Anacortes unincorporated territory to the City of Renton lying in an area generally Ave NE&NE lOth St bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary to the west; approximately the northern edge of NE lOth Pl.,if extended,to the north; the southem edge of NE lOth St. to the south; and the westem edge of 137th Ave.NE,if extended, to the east(Vuong Annexation). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCII,ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3615 A resolution was read calling for the annexation,by election,of contiguous Annexation:Falk,S 47th St& unincorporated territory to the City of Renton lying in an area generally ' 102nd Ave SE bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary,including S.47th St.,to the north;SE 185th Pl.,if extended,to the south; 102nd Ave. SE,to the east; , f � i� i I' January 27,2003 ` � Renton City Council Minutes ' Page 42 and the existing City Boundary to the west(Falk Annexation). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3616 A resolution was read approving the Liberty Ridge Phase 5 Final Plat Plat: Liberty Ridge Phase 5, consisting of approximately 11.4 acres located in the vicinity of NE lst St., NE lst St,FP-02-146 Edmonds Ave.NE, and NE 3rd and 4th Streets(FP-02-146). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3617 A resolution was read authorizing the Mavor and City Clerk to enter into a Human Services: Joint Human memorandum of understanding for the planning,funding,and implementation Services Funding Program, of a joint human services application funding program with South King County South King County Cities cities. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3618 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Utility: Apollo Lift Station, interlocal agreement with King County Water District 90 and Issaquah School Transfer of Ownership to City District relating to the transfer of the Apollo Lift Station and appurtenances from the districts to the City of Renton. MOVED BY CORMAN,SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLLTTION AS READ. CARRIED. "NEW BUSINESS Councilman Corman relayed complaints voiced by Victoria Park neighborhood . Transportation: Benson Rd S residents concerning the timing of the traffic signals on Benson Rd. S.,and in Traffic Signal Timing,Red relation to that,he stated that residents have also noticed an increase in the Light Running running of red lights. Police: Burglaries in Renton MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL REFER Highlands (Commercial& THE ISSUE OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL BURGLARIES IN Residential) � THE RENTON HIGHLANDS TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NELSON,SECONDED BY CORMAN,COLTNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 10:08 p.m. ��'�0" "�Y�'..�+ �' G�v'G�.�"�,''� B�I``�I�IIFs I.4V�,i.1'{3�T.�i��.�1�a'ar�C Recorder: Michele Neumann , 7anuary 27,2003 � EXHIBIT B R-8 Prezone Hearing Certified Council Minutes of January 27`�,2003 I�ocumentl\ i ;�� . ..Y; , � - ..:. : - RENTON CITY COUI�ICI��'s'��"� "-, ': �' �"��k�'�� ; �1+ � Regular Meeting ��^ w� � '. � � �� Co�ncil Chambers .' - January 27,2003 � �enton City Hall Monday,730 p.m M I N U T E S r�c„,;�,;,,;�,��p�VELOF,rru-�, � " . a�=i�i��H�-�orn�� : n� �':��:!�sT;�F,`;=ric��_�„v�v!N� G:��a��,�..�..,__=e,:,�-.,��.,� . • • • � . . ' CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the . . meeting of the Renton City Council to order. � ROLL CALL OF KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER,Council President;K1NG PARKER;DON - COUNCILMEMBERS PERSSON;RANDY CORMAN;TO1vI NELSON;DAN CLAWSON. MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL EXCUSE � � � ABSENT COLTNCILWOMAN TERRI BRIERE. CARRIED. � CITY STAFF IN 7ESSE TANNER,Mayor;JAY COVINGTON,Chief Administrative Officer; � � ATTENDANCE ZANETTA FONTES,Assistant City Attorney;BONNIE WAI-TON,City •� • Clerk;GREGG ZIIvIIvIERMAN,PlanningBuilding/Public Works Administrator;NEII.WATTS,Development Services Director;MIKE WEBBY,Human Resources Administrator;ALEX PIETSCH,Acting . . Economic Development Administrator;REBECCA LIIVD,Planner Manager; : DON ERICKSON,Senior Planner;JIM SHEPHERD,Community Services , � Administrator;DEREK TODD,Assistant to the CAO;COMMANDER : KATHLEEN MCCLINCY,Police Department. � SPECIAI.PRESENTATION Alex Pietsch,Acting Economic Development Administrator,introduced Terry . EDNSP:Marketing Campaign Godat,Travelers Inn General Manager,and Renton Lodging Associadon member. Ms.Godat explained that Renton hotel represen[atives make up the . membership of the Renton Lodging Association,and they work on a number of , � projects to market the hotels and the City. Ken Saunderson and Michael Hamilton with HanultonlSaunderson Marketing Partnership,reported that the Renton Lodging Association's tourism '� � � promodonal program,whose 2003 budget is approximately$80,000 to . $100,000,is designed to promote Renton as a destination and to promote � economic activity. Mr.Saunderson described the marketing tools used by the Renton Lodging Association to promote Renton,and noted that one of the goals in 2003 is to bring in additional marketing partners such as the Spirit of Washington Dinner Train,Maplewood Golf Course,and Valley Medical � Center. Mr.Pietsch noted that the program is funded by hoteUmotel tax � collections. Continuing,Mr.Pietsch stated that hoteUmotel tax collections are also used to � fund the Renton Community Marketing Campaign,wluch is a consortium of the � City of Renton,Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce,Valley Medical Center, � Renton Technical College,and Renton School District to collectively market the Renton community. Mr.Saunderson and Mr.Hamilton gave a briefmg on . the marketing campaign,noting that this year's theme is "delivering on the promise." Mr.Hanulton stated�that in 2003,in addition to the ongoing marketing efforts,the campaign will market the Renton community through a summer of events. These events include: highlighting facility openings such as • the II�A Performing Arts Center,Pavilion Building,Renton Municipal . : Parking Garage,and Renton Technical College Technology Resource Center; � : � the Ahead of the Curve Festival;Cinema at the Piazza Festival;and the Renton , Barbecue&Blues Festival. � : - ;� . � - CERTIFICATE `�``' --�--- . . = ---._.._... . ------- .- � .... .. . ... . . . . � - .1,the undersigr►ed'City Clerk of the �: �� . : � �. � �. - - - C.ity of Renton,VVashington,certify � � � � � � � � - — t at his is a true and correct copy of . . .. . ^ _ : - � -- � ��03 �.m�,��u,� Subscribed . � � � . � . �. = =__ �� -- and seaied this�day of . ,20 03 . .: .. : . - - ------- - � . ��c� . �,� . : � . . . '� . _.=. City Clerk. . � . . . �. January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 31 In conclusion,Mr.Pietsch reviewed the budget for the Renton Community Marketing Campaign, as well as the budgets for the three festivals. He pointed out that the General Fund impact to the City of Renton totals$35,000. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORTS RELATED TO THIS SUBJECT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding the Renton EDNSP: HoteUMotel Tax Lodging Association funding. The Committee met on this date to discuss Revenue Allocation to Renton recomrriendations of the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. In regard Lodging Association, Chamber to the request of the Renton Lodging Association, the Committee recommended of Commerce Contract recognition of the successes of the Renton Lodging Association's tourism promotional efforts, and funding of the program's fourth full year of operation by allocating$98,100 in hoteUmotel tax collections to that end. The Committee further recommended that the Council authorize the Mayor and Cit.y Clerk to execute a contract with the Greater Renton Chamber of , Commerce for year four of the Renton Lodging Association's tourism promotional effort. MOVED BY PARKER,SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMTTTEE REPORT. CARRIED. EDNSP: HoteUMotel Tax Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding the Renton Revenue Allocation to Community Marketing Campaign funding. The Committee met on this date to Community Stakeholders & discuss the recommendation of the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Barbecue&Blues Festival, to allocate funds for activities proposed by the Renton Community Marketing Hamilton/Saunderson Contract Campaign. The Committee concurred with the recommendations and asked the City Council to: � • Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a contract with Hamilton/Saunderson Marketing Partnership,marketing consultants, for a fifth year of the Renton Community Marketing Campaign; • Partner with other key community stakeholders for a fourth year of the Renton Community Marketing Campaign by allocating$20,000 of hoteUmotel tax collections for its use. This allocation will be leveraged with additional financial contributions from the Economic Development, . Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department's "business recruitment" budget, and other community agencies,organizations, and businesses; and • Allocate an additional$30,000 of hoteUmotel t�collections directly to the proposed Renton Barbecue&Blues Festival to be held in downtown _ Renton in September 2003. MOVED BY PARKER,SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. PiJBLIC HEARING3 This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Vuong,Anacortes accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public fiearing Ave NE&NE lOth St to consider the resolution authorizing an annexation election and consideration � ' of R-8(Residential Single Family;eight dwelling units per acre)prezoning for the City-initiated Vuorrg�Ann�xation; an approximately 2.70 acre site located ' east of Anacortes�Ave. NE and_riorth of NE lOth St . _ -_ � Don Erickson, Senior Planner,reported that the subject area was previously reviewed and approved-�y the,King County Boundary Review Board prior to the invalidation of the petition pr�icess of annexation by the State Supreme January 27,2003 " Renton City Council Minutes Page 32 Court in March,2002. The City purchased 1.125 acres of the annexation site as a future location for a surface water detention pond for the purpose of relieving existing surface water problems in the area. Stating that the proposed annexation area contains one single-family home,Mr. Erickson noted that there is no new private development proposed at this time. Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Residential Single Family, and R-8 zoning is proposed to replace the existing King County R-6 zoning. In regards to public services,he indicated that the subject area is within Water District 90, within the Renton sewer service area, and that fire protection is provided by Fire District 25;however, there is a shortfall of parks. Mr.Erickson detailed the fiscal impacts of the proposed annexation assuming an increase to eight single-family homes at full development, and a new home value of$250,000. The City will realize a deficit of$392 at current development, and a deficit of$107 at full development. Reporting an estimated one-time expense of$2,932 for the acquisition and development of parks,Mr. Erickson pointed out that a revenue deficit at current and full development is typical for residential annexations. In conclusion,Mr.Erickson stated that the proposed annexation is consistent with City policies for annexation, will further City business goals, and will result in no significant cost or service issues for the City. He recommended that Council adopt a resolution authorizing an annexation election,for which the City will bear the election costs, and authorize the Administration to draft a prezone ordinance for R-8 zoning for the subject site. Public comment was invited. There being none,it was MOVED BY PARKER, ' SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND ARRANGING FOR AN ANNEXATION ELECTION TO CONSIDER ANNEXING THE VUONG SITE AND ADJACENT STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE CITY; REQUIIZE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THE ANNEXATION AREA TO ASSUME THEIIt FAIR SHARE OF THE CITY'S OUTSTANDING BONDED INDEBTEDNESS;AND SUPPORT R-8 ZONING FOR THE ANNEXATION BECAUSE IT IS CONSISTENT WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION,RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY,FOR THIS AREA. CARRIED. (See page 41 for resolution.) Annexation: Falk, S 47th St& This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in 102nd Ave SE accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing to consider the resolution authorizing an annexation election and consideration of R-8 (Residential Single Family; eight dwelling units per net acre)prezoning for the Falk Annexation; 6.43 acres bounded by S. 47th St. to the north,SE 185th Pl. to the south, and 102nd Ave. SE to the east. Don Erickson, Senior Planner,pointed out that the subject annexation was part of a larger annexation(13.66 acres)by the same name initiated on March 4, 2002. Since the State Supreme Court invalidated the petition method of � annexation on March 14, 2002, adoption of a resolution authorizing an annexation election is recommended. The applicant, Stephen Beck,has agreed to reimburse the City for the cost of the election. Mr.Erickson described the January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 33 existing conditions of the site,noting the existence of four single-family dwellings, and a seasonal stream along the eastem property line.g Continuing,Mr.Erickson reported that the site is served by Fire District 40,is within the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, and roadway and stormwater improvements are likely. Stating that current King County zoning is R-1 with a Greenbelt/Urban Separator King County Comprehensive Plan designation,he explained that City staff successfully negotiated the removal of this area from the urban separator designation, and as a result the City can redesignate this site to a more intensive zoning. Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential Single Family,for which the proposed R-8 zoning is consistent with zoning to the west of the site and compatible with King County zoning to the east. Mr.Erickson reviewed the fiscal impacts of the proposed annexation,assuming an increase to 40 single-family homes at full development, and a new home value of$275,000. At current development the City will realize a deficit of $347, and at full development,the City will realize a surplus of$6,556. The one-time parks and development expense is estimated at$21,000. He reported that the proposed annexation meets the objectives of the King County Boundary Review Board and is generally consistent with City policies for annexations. In conclusion,he recommended that Council: adopt a resolution authorizing an annexation election for this site; authorize the Administration to draft a prezone ordinance for R-8 zoning; and authorize the submittal of the Notice of Interit package to the Boundary Review Board. Audience comment was invited. ' Reid McNair, 18525 102nd Ave. SE,Renton,98055, stated that he favored the annexation;however,his property is no longer within the annexation azea now that the area has been reduced from 13.66 to 6.43 acres. Emphasizing that he and many of his neighbors want to be annexed to the City of Renton,Mr. McNair asked Council to consider the original annexation. In response to Council President Keolker-Wheeler's inquiries,NIr.Erickson explained that Mr.Beck initiated the revised Falk Annexation, and he guessed that the boundaries were reduced because Mr. Beck felt confident that the two � registered voters living on the site would support the annexation. In the election process, a super majority, or 60%of the citizens residing on the site must assume the City's bonded indebtedness. He confirmed that the Council is not bound to accept the annexation as presented. Mayor Tanner urged Council not to take any action tonight other than on the proposal as presented. He stated that citizens who are not included in this annexation, and who are still interested in annexing to the City,can apply for annexation at a later time. Council discussion ensued regarding whether action should be delayed until the possibility of expanding annexation boundaries is explored. It was pointed out that Mr.Beck might not be willing to pay the election costs if the boundaries are expanded. Upon Mr. McNair's assertion that he was willing to absorb election costs,Mr. Erickson pointed out that action could be delayed a week for � further exploration of the matter. January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 34 Joe MacKenzie, 18533 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, and Louis Longo, 18509 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055,expressed their desire to remain in King County. Curtis Schuster, 12320 NE 8th St., Suite 100,Bellewe, 98005,representing KBS Development Corporation, stated that he is in the same situation as Mr. McNair, and wants the City to consider the original annexation. Fred Gustafson, 18439 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, stated that he resides in the proposed annexation area and is in favor of the annexation. He expressed his desire to be represented by the City of Renton,rather than by King County. Judy Richardson, 18816 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, stated that although she is not directly impacted by the proposed annexation, she wanted to point out that the site is on a dead end and there is no other way in and out of the � property except by 102nd Ave. SE or SE 186th St. Both of those streets are in King County;therefore,Renton's fire and police personnel must go through King County to get to the site. Ms.Richardson also pointed out that there is a seasonal stream on the east side of the site, and expressed concern about future development of that stream site. Stephen A. Beck, 19129 SE 145th St.,Renton, 98055, applicant for the Falk Annexation,expressed his fear that a larger annexation would not be successful; and for that reason, he chose to go forward with the annexation as proposed. Councilman Clawson noted that it may take some time to educate the neighboring residents about the annexation process, and recommended that . Council take action on the annexation as proposed. There being no further public comment,it was MOVED BY PARKER, � SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARIlVG. CARRIED. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN ANNEXATION ELECTION TO CONSIDER THE FALK AND GUSTAFSON PROPERTIES AND ABUTTING 102ND AVE. SE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE CITY; CONDTTION THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE ANNEXATION ON PROPERTY OWNERS WTTHIN THE ANNEXATION AREA ASSUMING THEIR FAIR SHARE OF THE CTTY'S OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS;REQUIRE THE APPLICANT TO REIlVIBURSE THE CTTY FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH HOLDING THE ELECTION; SUPPORT R-8 PREZONING FOR THE STTE;AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO SUBMIT THE NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. (See page 41 for resolution.) Council President Keolker-Wheeler encouraged those citizens interested in annexing to the City of Renton to contact City staff. Planning: Downtown Core This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Off-Street Parking accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing Requirements to consider the proposed amendments to the Downtown Core off-street parking ' requirements. Don Erickson, Senior Planner,explained that the 83-acre Downtown Core area � is currently exempt from all parking requirements and parking,when imposed, i January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 35 is required as mitigation through the SEPA(State Environmental Policy Act) process. The proposed amendments are recommended for the following reasons: SEPA imposed parking lacks predictability or standards;minimum off-street parking standards are needed to improve predictability and to replace parking lost to new development;and high occupancy uses generate a disproportionate demand for parking(dance clubs,dance halls, theaters, and churches). Stating that the proposed new urban(city center)standards provide for greater flexibility and protect existing buildings from becoming non-confomung uses, Mr.Erickson pointed out that the additional parking demand can be partially met through better management of the on-street parking supply. He reported that upon review of other jurisdiction's parking standards,it was determined that parking can be reduced significantly in urban centers served by good public transit and pedestrian friendly streets. Mr.Erickson noted that smaller sized cities with good transit and pedestrian friendly streets found lower parking ratios adequate, Continuing,Mr.Erickson reviewed the City Code amendments proposed for the Downtown Core which include residential and commercial uses, and assembly and high occupancy uses. He noted that existing commercial and residential uses would continue to be exempt from the City's parking provisions as long as they do not expand in size. If an existing building's use is expanded through an addition to the building,parking is only required for that addition. Mr. Erickson stated that staff recommends approval of the proposed City Code amendments to Sections 4-4-080B,4�-080E, and 4-4-080F.10.e of the Parking, �� Loading, and Driveway Regulations. Audience comment was invited. There being none,it was MOVED BY CORMAN,SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. (See page 40 for Planning& Development Committee report.) ADMIrTISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2003 and beyond. Items noted included: � Mayor Tanner's recently delivered 2003 State of the City address is available on the City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us and will also be cablecast on cable channe121 in early February. � Valley Community Players presents Dial "M"for Murder at Carco Theatre, from January 31st through February 23rd. � The new traff'ic signals along S. 2nd St. are now in operation. These signals include a signal arm extending over the intersections,thereby improving visibility of the signals and traffic safety. � City of Tukwila staff has verbally informed Renton that the opening of S. 180th St./SW 43rd St. will occur in July rather than May,2003. AJLS: 2003 State of the City Councilman Corman commended Mayor Tanner on his 2003 State of the City - Address,Mayor's Presentation address,noting that it is an honor to be part of the work that was presented. January 27,2003 � Renton City Council Minutes � Page 36 AUDIENCE COMMENT John Gasser,315 Williams Ave.N.,Renton, 98055, stated that he is co-owner Citizen Comment: Gasser— of The Met Coffee&Wine Bar located at 232 Burnett Ave. S., and he leases The Met Coffee&Wine Bar, the space for his business from the building's owner,Don Dally. Prior to Renton Transit Center leasing space at that location,Mr. Gasser said he was under the impression that Espresso Stand there were no plans for other coffee or wine shops in the immediate area. He soon discovered that another coffee shop was to operate at the Renton Transit Center, and that it was apparently being subsidized by the City of Renton. Mr. Gasser claimed that this was an unfair business practice,pointing out that his business is suffering due to construction in the area and he is trying ko find ways to survive during this hard time. Mr. Gasser reviewed his past dealings with City staff in regards to this matter, as well as the terms of the agreement that the City has with the owner's of the coffee shop. He asked the City to investigate the matter, including an audit of the coffee shop, to determine if this is an unfair business practice. Mayor Tanner confirmed that the City has a contract with the owners of the espresso stand,and that the owners secure and maintain the public restroom located at the transit center. Noting that the contract was entered into prior to the opening of The Met Coffee&Wine Baz,Mayor Tanner stated that the Administration has no intention of invalidating the contract unless they fail to maintain the restrooms. He said that the City will request an audit of the concession, and continue to look into the matter. Citizen Comment: Maple— Chris Maple,co-owner of The Met Coffee&Wine Bar, 315 Williams Ave.N., The Met Coffee&Wine Bar, Renton,98055, stated that the City did not go out to bid on this project,and Renton Transit Center pointed out that the contract is an extension of an existing contract the City has � Espresso Stand with the coffee shop owners for operating the City Scene Cafe at City Hall. She expressed her disappointment that no one else was given an opportunity to � be considered to operate a coffee shop at the Renton Transit Center. Ms.Maple stated that her business is suffering, and feels that one reason for this is the competition from the purported City-subsidized coffee shop. , Mr. Gasser added that he is also concemed about future agreements for leased � space in City-owned facilities such as the Renton Municipal Pazking Garage, and commented that had he lmown about the coffee shop,he might have . developed a different business plan. Responding to Councilman Corman's inquiry regazding the duration of the contract,Community Services Administrator Jim Shepherd stated that the five- year contract was entered into on October 1,2001. MOVED BY PARKER,SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THE RENTON TRANSIT CENTER ESPRESSO STAND CONTRACT AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington stated that the City recognizes the investments Don Dally has made in the downtown area, and emphasized that the City never intended to undernune or undercut his ability to lease space in that azea. The City intends to lease space at the Pavilion Building and the Renton Municipal Parking Garage in accordance with market rates. He added � that the contract provides the City with a service that was needed in that area. Councilwoman Nelson stated that there has always been a need for public restrooms in the downtown area,and a public restroom was included as part of January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 37 the construction of the transit center. She noted that the espresso stand owners provide a public service by taking care of the restroom. Mr. Shepherd confirmed that King County.built the Renton Transit Center, and that the Council authorized tenant improvements in the amount of$18,000 for the espresso stand. Citizen Comment: Johnson— Arland "Buzz" 7ohnson, 334 Wells Ave. S.,#221,Renton, 98055, expressed his Puget Sound Energy frustration with Puget Sound Energy in his efforts to find out if there is a plan in place to prevent future power outages in downtown Renton. Mayor Tanner acknowledged Mr. Johnson's concerns regarding power outages,noting that they do occasionally occur. In addition,Mr.Johnson extolled the benefits of living in downtown Renton, including the easy access to public transportation. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 7anuary 13,2003. Council concur. January 13,2003 Community Services: Veterans Administrative,Judicial and Legal Services Department recommended approval Memorial Park Naming to name the park site dedicated for a veteran's memorial at the comer of Main Ave. S. and S. 3rd St. "Veterans Memorial Park," as recommended by the Park Board. Refer to Communitv Services Committee. Plat:Liberty Ridge Phase 5, Development Services Division recommended approval,with conditions, of the NE lst St,FP-02-146 Liberty Ridge Phase 5 Final Plat;78 single-family lots on 11.4 acres located north of,NE lst St., south of NE 3rd and 4th Streets, and east of Edmonds Ave. NE(FP-02-146). Council concur. (See page 42 for resolution.) Development Services: Development Services Division recommended acceptance of the dedication of Kendall Court Short Plat, additional right-of-way of a six foot strip of land along NE 20th Pl. to fulfill a ROW Dedication at NE 20th requirement of the Kendall Court Short Plat(SHP-01-025). Council concur. Pl, SHP-01-025 Development Services: Development Services Division recommended approval of an ordinance Uniform Codes Adoption adopting the 1999 National Electric Code,2000 Uniform Plumbing Code,2001 Washington State Energy Code,and 2000 Washington State Ventilation& Indoor Air Quality Code. Refer to Planning &Development Committee. Human Resources: Deputy Human Resources and Risk Management Department recommended approval Fire Chief Position Salary to increase the salary of the Deputy Fire Chief position to salary grade m45 Increase to Grade m45 (monthly salary range$7,315 to$8,913)effective January 1,2003; and to place the two current incumbents at Step E. Refer to Finance Committee. Human Resources: 2003 Human Resources and Risk Management Department recommended approval Claims Processing Fee of the 2003 fee schedule for medical,dental, and prescription claims processing Schedule(Medical,Dental & by Healthcare Management Administrators and Pharmaceutical Card Service in Prescription) the approximate amount of$190,000. Refer to Finance Committee. Legal: Auto Theft Tools Legal Division recommended adoption of an ordinance that amends Renton's penal code to make it illegal to make or possess auto theft tools. Refer to Public Safety Committee. � Police: Crime Analyst Hire at Police Department recommended filling tlie newly approved Crime Analyst Step E position at Step E of the salary grade. Refer to Finance Committee. i- ' January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes ' Page 38 Transportation: Puget Sound Transportation Systems Division recommended approval to pay the Puget Energy Street Lighting Back Sound Energy street lighting back bill in the amount of$42,682. Refer to Bill Finance Committee. CAG: 02-161, Seneca Ave Water Utility Division submitted CAG-02-161,Seneca Ave.NW and NW 2nd NW/NW 2nd St Water Main St.Water Main Replacement; and requested approval of the project, Replacement,B&L Utility authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$12,974.40, commencement of 60-day lien period,and release of retained amount of $8,973.94 to B &L Utility,Inc.,contractor,if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. � MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEET,ER,SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Sanford E.Webb, 1129 167th St. SW, Citizen Comment: Webb— Lynnwood, 98037,regarding the proposed fence height regulations. He � Fence Height Regulations expressed concerns regarding the use of six-foot-high solid board fences,fence screening requirements,and the proposed Special Administrative Fence Permit. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT CONIMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINES5 Council President Keolker-Wheeler presented a report regarding the pilot Committee of the Whole project with South King County cities to consolidate the human services Human Services: Joint Human application and funding process. The Committee recommended concunence Services Funding Program, with the staff recommendation that Council approve the resolution authorizing �South King County Cities the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the memorandum of understanding for planning,funding,and implementation of a joint human services application and funding program. IVIOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 42 for resolution.) WSDOT: SR-167 Springbrook Council President Keolker-Wheeler reported receipt of two letters regarding the Creek Culvert Replacement closure of SR-167 for the replacement of the Springbrook Creek Culvert. One Project is a copy of a letter from the Renton Board of Public Works Acting Chairman, Dave Christensen,addressed to the Laura Musso-Escude at the Washington State Department of Transportation;and the other is from Bjom Bayley and Anders Berglund,II�A owners,600 SW 43rd St.,Renton,98055. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WI�ELER,SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THESE ITEMS OF CORRESPONDENCE TO THE TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION)COMMTTTEE. CARRIED. Council:Workshop Report Council President Keolker-Wheeler presented a report on the four-hour Council (1/21/2003) workshop that occurred on January 21, 2003. The goal of the workshop was to work through some issues that require Council discussion in advance of the annual CounciUstaff retreat,thus allowing staff time to prepare responses to those issues for discussion at the retreat. Ms. Keolker-Wheeler noted that as with all meetings of the City Council, this meeting was open to the public. However,public comment was not allowed,as it was a Council workshop session. � Ms. Keolker-Wheeler summarized the issues discussed at the workshop which were as follows: Council electronic mail;communications;historic issues; leasing policies;The Boeing Company and Explore Life project;roles and responsibilities;budget; temporary signage; the West Hill area in relation to . 7anuazy 27,2003 ' Renton City Council Minutes '"- Page 39 � Renton's Potential Annexation Area; the City's cable channe121;property taxes; and the Renton Community Marketing Campaign. In addition,she reported that several items pertaining to the way Council interacts with staff were also referred to the upcoming CounciUstaff retreat. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending that City Finance: Finance Analyst II Council approve filling the regular Finance Analyst II position at Grade 13, Hire at Step D Step D, with the incumbent limited term Finance Analyst II,Dawna Truman. MOVED BY PARKER,SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance: Vouchers Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of Claim Vouchers 211612-211979 and two wire transfers totaling � $2,730,112.30; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 42342-42560, one wire transfer and 558 direct deposits totaling$1,787,051.45. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation(Aviation) Transportation(Aviation)Committee Chair Persson presented a report Committee regarding the S. Grady Way westbound concrete approach to Rainier Ave. The Transportation: S Grady westbound approach of S. Grady Way to the intersection of Rainier Ave.has Way/Rainier Ave S Pavement experience serious rutting and shoving of asplialt out of the wheel paths onto Rehab Design,Entranco the adjacent C-curb and sidewalk. As an interim fix, to keep the approach safe and open to the traveling public, and to allow time to design and construct the permanent solution,this intersection was overlaid as part of the 2002 Overlay project. The permanent solution is to construct the final,approximately 550 feet of the westbound approach of S. Grady Way to Rainier Ave. with concrete. � Council previously approved the 2003-2008 Transportation Improvement Program(TIP),which budgeted$620,000 for the design and construction of this project. The consultant agreement between the City and Entranco,Inc. is � in the amount of$53,504.46 which, when executed,will allow the design of this project to commence. Construction ad is expected in Apri12003. The Committee recommended that Council accept the S. Grady Way Westbound Concrete Approach to Rainier Ave.project, and authorize the Ma,yor and Cit,�rk to execute the agreement with Entranco,Inc.,in the . amount of$53,504.46. MOVED BY PERSSON,SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCII.CONCUR IN TI�CONIlVIITTEE REPORT.* . In response to Councilman Parker's inquiry regarding the construction schedule, Councilman Persson reported that construction of the project will begin in April and should be completed by this summer. *MOTION CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report regarding the request by Utility: Sewer Connection Roderick Williams for sewer connection to his properties located outside the Request for Property Outside City limits. The Committee recommended concurrence in the recommendation City Limits,Williams of staff that Section 4-6-040C of City Code be amended to allow owners of multiple e�sting legal lots to connect to the City's sewer system,if so authorized by the Renton City Council. The proposed amendment affects only those portions of the City's sewer service area and those portions within its � adopted Special Assessment District(SAD)boundaries that lie outside of the City's Potential Annexation Area(PAA). Existing legal lots lying within both the City's PAA and within the City's sewer service azea shall still adhere to existing Code Section 4-6-040C.1.d regarding provision of service. � '� .. . . . . ---i i + January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 40 The Committee also recommended that the ordinance regarding the proposed amendment be presented for fust reading upon its introduction. Upon passage of the ordinance,the Committee further recommended approval for sewer connection outside the City limits by Mr.Williams,to connect three existing lots that are within the City's existing SAD boundary for 80th Ave. S.,but outside of its PAA.* . � In response to Mayor Tanner's question whether the West Hill area water and sewer district's(Skyway Water and Sewer District)plans to extend its sewer service aazea to encompass the subject properties has been completed, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman reported that the district has agreed to extend its service;however,the City has not yet received a formal agreement. In response to Councilman Parker's inquiry as to what current City Code allows,Mr.Zimmerman stated it allows sewer service connection outside the City limits to a preexisting single-family lot, and the proposed amendment allows connection to multiple existing lots. � *MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEEL�R, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE CONIlVIITTEE REPORT. CARR�D. Utility: Apollo Lift Station, Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report regarding the transfer of Transfer of Ownership to City ownership of the Apollo Lift Station. The Committee concurred in the recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department that Council approve the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement for the transfer of sewer facilities, which allows for the transfer of the Apollo Lift Station,to Renton. MOVED BY CORMAN,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 42 for resolution.) Planning &Develonment Planning and Development Committee Vice Chair Clawson presented a report Committee regarding big-box retail use in the Center Office Residential(COR)3 Zone. Planning: Center Office The Committee met on January 16th to review the proposed zoning text Residential3 Zone,Big-Box amendment to add big-box retail use to the COR 3 Zone. The Committee Retail recommended adoption of the Planning Commission recommendation adding this use, subject to Note#71, "Big-box retail to be permitted in the COR 3 . � Zone,east of Garden Ave.N. and north of N. 8th St." The Committee further recommended tliat a public hearing regazding this matter be set on February 10, 2003. � The Committee also raised the issue of how wireless communication facilities are permitted in the COR 3 Zone,noting that future mapping of this zone in areas within the Employment Area-Transition Comprehensive Plan designation could lead to development with both residential and commercial activity, including wireless communication. The Committee concurred that this issue requires additional review and recommended that it be refened to the Title N (Development Regulations)docket amendment process for analysis of how wireless facilities are treated in all mixed use zones. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. � Planning: Downtown Core Planning and Development Committee Vice Chair Clawson presented a report Off-Street Pazking regarding the Downtown Core off-street parking requirements. The Committee Requirements met to review the ordinance changes for the current parking-exempt Downtown _ --� _ . i � � 1 S�-- - � January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes `" Page 41 . Core area, and recommended that Council support the following amendments to the parking requirements for the Downtown Core: 1. Allow exemptions to transfer to new uses and changes of uses occupying existing square footage. 2. Establish a new minimum standard for new residential uses of one space per unit within the Core. 3. Increase the standard for low-income elderly housing to 1.0 space per each three units (0.33 spaces/unit). 4. Establish a new standard for new commercial uses of 1.0 space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for most commercial uses. 5. Establish a new standard of 1.0 space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for restaurants and 5.0 spaces for stacking for each station. 6. Adopt existing Citywide standards for most recreational and entertainment uses with the follow exceptions: a. A new standard of 15 spaces for eacli 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for dance halls,dance clubs,and skating rinks. 7. Adopt a new standard for religious institutions of 1.0 space for each five seats in the main auditorium,provided that spaces for any church shall not be less than ten spaces. For all existing religious institutions enlarging the seating capacity of their auditoriums, 1.0 additional parking space shall be provided for each five additional seats provided by the new construction,or ten spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area without fixed seats. For all churches making structural alterations or additions,which do not increase the seating capacity of the auditorium,see "outdoor and indoor sports arena,auditoriums, stadiums,places of public assembly,movie theaters, and entertainment clubs." 8. Allow parking to be provided off-site within the Downtown Core without distance limitations. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS � Resolution#3614 A resolution was read calling for the annexation,by election,of contiguous Annexation: Vuong,Anacortes unincorporated territory to the City of Renton lying in an azea generally Ave NE&NE lOth St bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary to the west; approximately the northern edge of NE lOth Pl.,if extended,to the north; the southern edge of NE lOth St. to the south; and the westem edge of 137th Ave.NE,if extended, to the east(Vuong Annexation). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3615 A resolution was read calling for the annexation,by election,of contiguous Annexation: Falk,S 47th St& unincorporated territory to the City of Renton lying in an area generally ' 102nd Ave SE bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary,including S.47th St.,to the north;SE 185th Pl.,if extended,to the south; 102nd Ave. SE,to the east; January 27,2003 ' Renton City Council Minutes � Page 42 and the existing City Boundary to the west(Falk Annexation). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3616 A resolution was read approving the Liberty Ridge Phase 5 Final Plat Plat: Liberty Ridge Phase 5, � consisting of approximately 11.4 acres located in the vicinity of NE lst St., NE lst St,FP-02-146 Edmonds Ave. NE, and NE 3rd and 4th Streets (FP-02-146). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3617 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a Human Services: Joint Human memorandum of understanding for the planning, funding, and implementation Services Funding Program, of a joint human services application funding program with South King County South King County Cities cities. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COLINCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3618 A resolution was read authorizing the Mavor and City Clerk to enter into an Utility: Apollo Lift Station, interlocal agreement with King County Water District 90 and Issaquah School Transfer of Ownership to City District relating to the transfer of the Apollo Lift Station and appurtenances from the districts to the City of Renton. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Corman relayed complaints voiced by Victoria Park neighborhood . Transportation: Benson Rd S residents concerning the timing of the traffic signals on Benson Rd. S., and in Traffic Signal Timing,Red relation to that,he stated that residents have�also noticed an increase in the Light Running running of red lights. Police: Burglaries in Renton MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY CORMAN, COLTNCIL REFER Highlands (Commercial& THE ISSUE OF COMIVIERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL BURGLAR�S IN Residential) THE RENTON HIGHLANDS TO THE PLTBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL AD70URN. CARR�D. Tune: 10:08 p.m. � �. G��-� Bt}�I.�►xJ�T�.3�T,Ci�y.Gle�'k Recorder: Michele Neumann January 27,2003 EXHIBIT C Legal Description for Falk Annexation Documentl\ 1' I I FALK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 32, Township23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.,King County, Washington, lying northerly of the south line of the north 72 feet of the south half(1/2) of said subdivision; EXCEPT the east 20 feet thereof; TOGETHER WITH those portions of the west 30 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the east 20 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, all in Section 32, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying northerly of a line described as follows: Beginning said line at a point on the west boundary line of the plat of Windsor Heights, as recorded in Volume 173 of Plats, Page 28 through 30, inclusive,records of King County, Washington, said point being 102.80 feet southerly of the northwest corner of said plat and also being a point on the easterly right of way margin of 102nd Ave SE; Thence westerly along said line, said line being perpendicular to said plat boundary line and right of way margin, crossin� 102 Ave SE,to an intersection with the westerly right of way margin of 102" Ave SE and the termination of said line. .r . .� ...._..... -. . - COUNTY AS � ESSOR � � KI NG � ,e,En/ToN ORD .926B a,..�,..._...r...:r., x. r::r. -xe'�,wttw . 3T 7' - . ... .. x. . , - . �... �. .�y.,: .. ; ;:r:.:....�..;,,;_:�...:;.,�CJ+.Px�. r� :;r:,.u!:U�. .y.:_...,.ah�.' .�u,�s h�.,��` , ^��,��A�:. '.�'k., : � - ."� "p� v 3a�,�� xw :.:e' ' �' '.Y� V ;�; \�: , '�. '�� 0 , �:�� ------ ��' � =�� '�'��, � �,! ! Z, E.I.W�,1.1�!>(q, S kV • � �� 1 � � GI- :, � `^ . SP � � �G y.,: / � � ;` �� `` ,3•; ��-'- �,��, . � r - �'9 � 0 0.03 �0 Coc � _;, 22 �� ya n �°' f� �0 N �, " 63G.'7G � :;::. _ - - c?�� ,TR TR °� 20 N I , � � ,� N N ` q S� ` �' .. !.1 '7��a'� �� N.Y�l�}. 1�1.�11.q. �.. �.pd� �.�.�: ��'-� �o�� l��O '�1�� , :. �j 96 •/��07� �/ ,�'.. ... • j ' N• +�+V,'�.�i'.'C;th:w,7��i�.,:�4�!�W"hfe:y;�y '2�..: •, • ��I� �O W �'Mn2' " .. �.�, ', �..� ..�....�vi`!s.. '�'S2_�-`'�'I� �wGw'f.�'iW�aw':f.`4��..f. . s..;,�,., :..�u�>�.;.,,. ,... , . 23o W `�S 9.3g N S E � . �,pv6;Go t Y . (� . � �,�c„oJ ' .�/}c. n � /� � �rt� N �0.09 , O/7'O Q ��I j n �� 7.49 ;�l` n0� - Z � TR � ��° � 2 qa � � �"�� 1�. o � $q�� t��o � h°po�tP N ' i76 — 30� 34� �9•9/ �0.09 , N - — — 'r �3� �o so R� � ,�c, � �� TR.A I � b i �NGPE o -6 � . 2' I '�/GZ � Q� �Nct iNr. ` �$ qq . . a �� _ .<Psor _ o�p� �3��1 60��0 �o�'o c*1 o a� I f'� ``�O�o] — t� � � � . ' c3�:�. i , �. S E l8 i ; � ; .�� .a.�. �, I . Wi �'°3,. . . � . EXHIBIT D Three Sets of King County Assessor's Maps Documentl\ EXHIBIT F Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Designations Document2\ � � ` 1 . ♦, . ---i M! y ; � fe, � Y M f♦ Y f • Y � + � ��.� ' � M� � � M , ' � � i�M �� I �� , ' � •Y1 � -- f �. ' ��., .� 1 ' i � �D i j • � � -z �-� ! ----- ------ -- - +i M � � � �" " �--------r---� . � ; i � i i , � _ ,. , _a i � � i i e 1 � � "...� .., �� ■w . 1� ��. •� !1 ! � ` 1�� "�!—1 � •�r +� � � ' � �� •1! � ��rr � � ,� :...,,A � •�. i�a s � i • � ... i . ♦ � .... / ■ � � I � r «r� 9Q �� e • � � � . N " "` � �w M `� r wl � � ■ ♦ 1 �� A � I�� ! � � l:� �• �,` 1 --- ...•~.i l I �� /1� � + __ __-� --- ' • 1 , _-_ - � _ �, -=_____-_ --> . -- - :... .�. � i - --_--_-_-_ .,.. �i� . . � • ■ i4 � �---� - .we w.- •r. ■ �� •+ + � -- � .�. � � _: -_ ___ m,. � ... �i 1 . � ; .,, �. - - .�„ _, � -.::y�,..- 'f s� I - �s�• ' ..w 1 = „ �M ._, s � .. ` _� , M 'KAt L.AREWASFiINQ7'ON ,�t •�4 1 � �• ` -� ''...�'.1 ' � 1 f f +..., • �,,;` „,. . " a . �;�; � :�� .�.. .. , , � � , . *, e �"�� — . �w � J � � � - --- --------=- ��`�' , � } F �. ' . �• �. • . • �'��• �j � -� �� ••• i � � . �� • � � �� - , � , � M♦ Y ! _ � � � � �^' q , 1 / 1 � � "� -- . ; � �.J f ; r� ,' . � �� — �� _� � � ��1' I ). •41� M �IwY 7 � J� ° � / y ■�� ! � ; "� � �� f � ■4• � � t�� _t � . �1 7� � � � e �� .--"�'� �',.\ ,,.. � ■ -� w _ Oi4� _ .�.. , � � � 1 � � �► ,.� , } � �.•a � � ' , , 1 1 � � �nw ,\ ��.v-;_�`_ •,a •� R ■ �� r � ` w• � � � �ir ,�� \ �f •ra �� ra� � 1 � n�• •�n. " N; ' � �L_ ' . i'i�R�R , a'� � r � ' K�a � } ; , � M � � �� I1 f r • !^ � �w' � •. � t r�i � � � � �� , �� m1• m1 , �w� 1 ! � � n ��t• ■r� •un• ` ! � t MMn R I + � � { •� ^ � , , „ � �J � M � !� I� '� 1 � � � � !! •w� " �, � ��! �� r 1� r ■ a� ' I � � �^ ■we �� I" � M� ; t r n ■ J -'�" . I ~�' r a� --- �; � � � � �, , � '�. i � �� . � � � � i__ �;�i ; i . . . • � �_. � •�F � Y M M M . ! I �� `�... , I !'-., ,_._� ... ! I ! r�� 1 �. . ,_ i ..,s . ^' • � R � �t! � , `� �� ,�e.s i < . . _�� r-- : �� ■1r� � � ��. ' t� ; , ,„, ,— �� ` 1 � 3�_�E � � 1 . �� ur. ir• r,� � _ � nwe .r• -- � ■��.� �w� � I I `^ � �. � + A � � (� ! ■r n � �1 ", _,_�y � •�._ � . • � � , ,� i.� � , r !'�'. 'I , � � 8� / ■�r Y � ■w• � �. � _._ a . , �� n.. .�Nn. 7." � � I . . M, w 1� J �•u�w' w •'�" e •u� � u ' • •+" d'" • 1 I - ■WR ' i r M M \ t�,a�,�;Mt , , , •;" �, `^�' � .�1+�� I� `;�� _i-- •:, , 4 .�.R ! .,.. ;� i � a� � :I 11 , •N�f � � � � � i�f nf � .'� I I � � �� Wl M M •WI�_ � ' I �� 'I � a r � I � JI f ' L____ � �M �MR � • e ! i �� /� �� 2 ��I �� .. �; ��`� � � � 't•� � � \i � � �� w� i KE \\\. �{- � ....,rk ' t`w �-_y�,,,� .s�1 � � 1 "� ( � ��M•/_.� � '"� � r 'i�" i �� "'. � ,�� ' � (�/`�^ ! �ri�.., ,`. �� f'''� � • `r ' _ . _ ,1. F� � r� : •~ . ,t �� eB., '"�*.YqO,-- _((�� ; •.µ J . � / j .. I._ o�l � S��1 i��wa ' r�♦ j ��,� ��,__ ,�+ � f � , I { � � �►. \� �wx t� �I � 7 , / � n �'�.J r Myw �t I ' j i I • a 1 1 ,� t �+ '� " � �n.r � e e'� � �"1` . - r � �`� 3 1 .� i..� ■m� �,w '""'- 'i ' ' .n�._..i �.=:'r�"- — .r, � I , _ a,.� �--� I " ' " � rl � � w■ • 1 " -a ! A;�� s� � .j ' i �! i i i "t�� j =i�,`.•�^ �i � � •�.5� � ,„(-, ,�-- .. i e a �' � ., � � � � '" �- � ��"".-� � � +�.. i _ .. �I� t 1 ;'' � �t ' ' 1� �,' .Y '�*` y^ r•�.�,�,. f 1 � � � � .` � `, ! i ... � �.�� • � � ! .., j ° •o r i . '° � � � + ' a � ; • `' � _�' � iLS' i � ..�,. a t� .se--�1 1 ! .... �\� ; ;; �w R A ! t!�. n,.,., - ,�, . i i 1 1 � ,- _ �-h ��1 �� I a 8 6 �' *�' , `, . Y L _T"_ l� Y w m�"•py�� r+ •n0 + f )�/ y *� � � �� /�(iay,'�� I -- �' I � ! A �!` • ''��r�rnd f' � � ( 1 i ' >' ' _ Jr _ ;, ! � ` ,"" ` M'� ..1 i ——�.—. �, �r _ _�.� �. _� .,.� � �''� i I —,� Y Y 9 � � i�l I 7 � e 1 � • � , # uw�e + iae e �.�.�.�.�.�.� .. �a• mr �I ' 'I C � Q � � � � � � � �w. 1 . ' � � •�• •"M ■w• ! _ �nw� �� ♦�` ' i ; �� r /�� . . 1 ! a w�• a�." w ` s •. j " / . . I 1 ^ ! ! t p ,,,,,,,� '��KE DE3IRE r ) j + _a ■... .w. ! ! ! + + � f �t \ � ! 1 � I ` . � J � . .... � � . .., � .^ �.. � s� . -�� '�;• .... �--- � � ' �! if, ,�i � � �v t ,— �• " a a , • M ' t �... � � , r , . • ,� . d �• ! , i' � ��., , . i � , , f . i � i ; i' ._N! , ..�. .�. . i � i;:�i ,{ � P � i � ' IIY■ j l 4 7 •�F• ' I M [M � �+, 1.___� ( fr• � d � � � 1 L� ! -- SHADY LAKE •��L'.� j i / 1 1 � E _�j `I�I t� PANTtiER LAK� + i ■ r. " � � - i i f 1! ��• �.�,. �01 ■�. . � ■ ._._ _- � � • �i y • • ■r a� • _-_-__-_-_ �, • i .� � , i �r.. a�ll� � � w � • � ■re ! ` � Y . _--_.___ ' � � —� � { ♦ y• �r� �r■ 'I � � � . i � ' � ! LAKEYOUNQS ... �. M ..�. .�. • e ! .�. •r i�� ! �+tie �r. , y � . .. w •rf �r �r�ww w..i+, rew. , •�r.� . !� e r" � ___ . -�' . ; ��«� /N� M r ' _ - __-��_'%-�_ ■ � • ~ ' ' � _ � M _ � lN• y •M� � �n= 1 '! � e • . � RESIDEN'TL4L EMPLOYMENT AREA DESIGNATIONS OReeidondnl Rural O Fmployment Area-Comme�cial O Reaidend�l SinQle Family � E��o��,�.o�a C I TY O F R E N T O N OReeldeatld Optione � Employmaot Area-Induetrial OResldenGal Plmned Neigliborh«id � Employment Ara-Vd1ey ■ o R«,d�u�M��;_F�,y�n,� - E�loyment Ara-Ttaneitlon(Intarim) C o m p re h e n s i ve P I a n L a n d U s e M a p CENTER DESIGNATIUNS MI3CELLANEOUS DES[GNATIONS � Center Naig6borhood O Convenimx Commercial �] c�,�R s�,�m ti o� ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT � c`cnur pownmav Ciry[.imib � 2� 4� �O• Techrt�c�e�rvices�b(ic Works � Center OR'ico Rcsidcncial Urben(}rowth Boundery 1:48000 ,I. Adopted Augttst 13,2001 � Center InsHtuNon n C'enter Vitlagc EXIIIBTT E.1 Vicinity Map for Falk Annexation Document2\ - - �� =_qll�t��V � ■ ■ �.� �� ■� �1�� - �� - ��C ,�IIIIIII�'� � � � 7�� -�n■n��i �� 1 ♦ i1 uuq� ■ !� t\Inn �� mmmn e �--� ■ �� .� ■ �i . �111 �IUinll—: :==� ■ �� 111�11;: � i; i , ' -' - :C �� .-..• . � �—�� •\ C �� ' ■ ■ ■ _ U�m . � � . � �' � u� � �I I � �� -�.��1111f�_ 1� �1�� . ■■ . � ■� �. . �. � :� . . ��:.� :: C �� iii�� • �� .. . _ �III � �� 1 i 1��%� :: : �� :: i-� -\ � � � ' i -� �" i �� 1 � .. \' �� I • � 1� I�II�� ■ %,� � � : =��!�� I�i _ _. , , � � � 1 �� r'� �� , • `' ��I ' � . � � • ' �� i � i��:��C ' -.■ ' ��' , � � � ■�' ��i a� � 1 �1 �� up� � �1 I� �'�. � � �u �� f �� ,� .. .. , . �� . „_= .,_ , �� ♦ ��• „ � �� ;��i i��i ; �� ■� � � .�In��■■i ■ I�� ■ .■�� . �►�� ■�1��.� �, : �� I�■�■�� :►�� ii a�`�� .� ��■�� ► �� '�� I� ��r�� - � - ��■��■ ��■ �� I �� ■�� :� � ��/: ��I/ �� , �♦ � �� — l��/�� ■► �� / - D ►►��I ��G� �1►�� p�n I��/111_��►-�-�� -' .I� J� :,�..._„.,...,�_= � ,■ ��,` ♦ ` —�--�=�:,�� r�►\ti ..:..•:_ . _�11■■■�� 11-1111111: �� i _ ■ � inm�1\�� ■ �� 1��1��I�I�� ■ �.i �� I � � • �� ■ � ��I� �� , — �7��1�1��f �� r� � � � � ��1� �. ��11��I�i��►1��a � �/��►`� � �I O� �� —� a ] �7� ��7 �� _� � � � � L` � ��u U�` . .►� � �,�,�, �r_� � _ � . . : _ .,,��. ��.� �,..r,. - � �� ■ �� ..�� . mmm\� ��....� �■: ■ �,�a � i.i��i�n,��0 � � � ►�i► � 7 ■ ■. ��:�:��.��.� � L �� r,�� IIIIII ■: ��1►��. � ��w�,�l�,��t � i�a r■C::��i I- �l�� 1:'�' �� . .►. ��G ��L: 7G��,�� 'i ��•.�� • I 1 11\: �� :Iy':�`�� ' I�,�� i �� !�1.► �.:■..�111:►;� �;•� 1'�� `., ■ _ , _ ,� ....■■�� .G� ..�..�_,i r � ��'�� ,;;�:�:i�.;� ��. :.� .. �II'll' ' � ' � � •,. •'■ � '■■,� pC : ■ � �''�I►�%�:: i�.-,�� ' ' ;',�,!1��i . � � �� ■ I 1 � , ��LJIII ��I � ��►�■ 7 � � �� 1�i �� `�� ■ � ■ - ��1�� \��, ��■_ ��li �� 1 I�I��■�� ►��1�� .� .� — '� . .� . � � �iri� ��11 �,�i � :� :� ■i � ■ � � 1 1'�i� � �: :i � � ■ � r��.�,,•� / � i� �i ■�� _ ■ �i.��. ...,.:,:, ,��► � : _: :: _.... : . ..�� _. . ��„�: „� . �.. .::�- 7111� . ��:�IIII �.:i�1 -��r:-::;��:!_�= =��: ■�I� � , , _ . ..... L - �•� =►�7=:==- --• .r �; .��,�� s �� 1��■ �► �ti�� i �a� ■ �■��II ��. .. �►�� _ � �� '�� 1�/ �t ��■� �� ,C Citi�� I—■_ � �F � IIr � � � �. .. .� �J�11 1/� � �� AI �� .� � �� . � / / 1 � 1 1 � � / •:::•:.e•:::>:•:.�,•it�1<firi}:�}}.`•:•:>'r:•:?:«•7•:i:�:; r' ...... �:;�;:::�s:;::•>:;:� • . • � � " � • .�.�� .�� .�� / , . - • • �• :• •. •� . �. . �� • -� • :• •. EXHIBIT E.2 Water District Map for Falk Annexation Vicinity Document2\ � � I�t� ull�►� V�:■ ■"�_.� �� ■� �I�u��t � �� .',_ �7�� u�1� ■ � `�� IIIIIII � � i. �� -��.�� ■ - t,lllll �� 11111111111 ��J�� •■■■■�I�r� � � �i . �� IIII�� : :�� ` rL��t��7 � �� ■ , � � —. .. =� �� iin� i �� ■ ■ � � �� :11�, � �, _� � � ■ I � jjllllll � � � � � ■ � _`��-%rlllll�� ,� �"- i i� . ♦ � � � �� , . �' ► r�� i � �� i I%�11�:: : �� ,,/ �� :: ��'� � ■ �� \ • �� :11� � � ■ � �� III�... �.�• .. _ � . _ _�S � , '� � � 1 '�� i�� ,�.� .' � � ��- �"� �� ; `' ��I� ' i� � ■ .�� ' a�� , �� = i ji:�►�� -.■ ,j� � �� I�� ' 1 /I Is ��. � � � . �u:�� _ � �� i � �ii��f �� ; � � .. . i��' �°=� = :':►:: '-n�: ��_�� ° ��:,�� ■.■.■� = :�.•`�.mn■■i . : �� ■ .�� . :►��i �� ■�■■■ :►��■ .. ��i , ��■�� ►�� .. ��1� � � 1�� ■�� r�� . � - �■■■■��■ ��■ ��0! ��I �� I Q��t��1�/' ��I� S:� �� ,` �:n*_� � , - �� ►�: �s � � �� . �� .�►�� ■_�..�. __..._,.. G��►n�1��►�� 7A� 7 . '�� ,: ��:4 �=�� _ �� : �%!'; L � � _ :_�� ou��► �� 1�� 11111111111111: ��i iii _ � . ,� � � � u�nnl\�� D O■ �� -� ��p�� ■ �.� ■� ��/��■ �� I � ♦ � �� ►\��I� �� , � L7�4i ��ti ■�� = •,��11� �■ 7��1��►�••��, �il��►�� —►•n� :`•�: ` -� LS � .7. ar� �� : : � � � ��u �1�` . .►� � �� ,r—= ' - .� ,�., • : � � ,: �i��. ��a._ . � .�►.■ . � ��--- " . ■�►�,: ��7�7�y li�r- --,•;.�.�•n�.■�� i,.. nuu�n�� ..� � � � v � u r�� . � �■' r� ��` ■ �. ��vu�i� �r -� ��. .nr�.� ��%' ��1�,��''�,��'�'JI�� ;I�T!� � �q �:� �" �-1 ,— ��\�r.� , . ,� . � •• . �►�. . ■� � w�,�� ■.��1�'�1� �IVC r,■':::►��j '- ■ �••� ��:=,::�l`.��I� �i�i�0��: _� .,L� e/11�1/ll�.r-,r�Y� V�� I�►�1 � 1�i �� !�1':%:i i111:'��;--;�� . ; � -•;-.,.c�, � . �� ■.�� 11 .r� .�I�.�_�I � �� I��::�� 1'■ :a• ■■ ��' � � ' � �� -._ ■'■ � '�_ :: : ■ � �' •i��.: � ■� �� ■1 � ►'��=ii:�-.� �� C■ ,. ' I r •u.,.;�JIn t��l � �■■��■ 7 � � � �� !t�: �� i -�• b.�.: _� ■ r � � �.�■��_ ..�.■ .�■� . ii� \ ��i :IIL: �; � _ -- -• _ �� I.I��■�"/�,' IQ`��! : :: :� ■� � ■ ` � 1�� = :� =� � � ■ �J�r■ �� /� � • � . �� .. ■ � �� ■ �� C p� :� ■�� i■I:i�ll�i�'��1�:�:111l111�1 1 : � :: �••• � ■ . �.. ._ -.- 7111� • ■.i� � _■ . ��; ••■ � - - . � -��!�IIII`�;,;il� ��r:-:::��i!=�: :��; ■III�L , .. �.�i� �►��=:�:. .�. .f: �-_ �,1��IS d �%•'��p� :: �1 firi■ � ��■�,:,I: ��•I ��II■:: :: ��:i::� � ��_ ■� ��r.- ■��. •. ■., :_: :: .-== === --- � _�i � - ■ .--�- � � � � � � � � ...:-•::•:::::•: I I ,. .......:�;s::::;;�s:::::o:it<::zz•:::>:•: �:;�r>;:•;:r:::•;r; I+ • � • . � � � � � • �,.�� ,� .�� ,. ,..� �. �� J � � - - - . . �. :. •. . • �_ �� .•• -• • :• •. EXHIBTT E.3 Wastewater District Map for Falk Annexation Vicinity Document2\ �I � � � ..e�aQ'+�`� �v��aoo — —� �� .�■■■ ��....—,.r � �■�i � e�`�o��'�� 7�� %�.�..�. � � � � 1111191 � � ��■� �� mllll isll➢➢fillld� �� '��"�� i i ' I :,�I! e�e.Bls��o�9�_= ===� ■ �i �L111�11:; � ■; ■ � I_ . .. ;' �: �� J�■iii�� ■ ��i 7� ■�„f'-'► , ', - i i � � �o ��-/�111111�f,� � �! � �� A�� ii i •' , .%�\ �1' 1�� ii i � � ��■■A �a� �� 6�998l�� 1,/ � ��:: �i� � � -- � � � '�j i �C �' �� — ■ ��.,,,�III... �.� � - . .. . ■ ■ -�=�� i� � � � '�= = � :�-�.. ��.� �1�� '� ;.�.� �� '° = ' ��;:'° ;= , �� ,�►oa� �� ■"'=i` � ' I ��I/ �� i � ' �•�A� � � �� i � i�'��,� i ��d,�. �� :�� d,a. �- � _=� = � ��:�%�'� i � I�+r�Ps �� 11. �� ! � �� 1 �e�� r � ��■� � ��.I��■�i � J �� . �"'s�" 1 ��■� .■�■ � :��i �r�� r � � �� ....... :.-•- -- ..� -�� ........ .�...■ -- �� r�� ■ �� I � �� ■ �� I . ��/: ��I��:� , �� .� �'�' a • ��1�� ■� �: �s � � D ►►��i ��■ .1�� s�savs� I��1111��►�� G ��',' ■. 7 �� s �ll�e��l s v o ddlC ^ �� -� ��i�•i d. �! e _�..�..,.._ ♦ �. �, 111-�� 11��■�� : �n�ti _ � � �� ► •��_ 11111111111111. �� i r A � ��u�n\�� ■ ■�� , � u��p/� . �C■ ■.■ �� I � � � �� ►t��1� �� — L'�I�I �� S�� r� �� ,,,- �. � ��6 t��►��f ■il��►�� —►•n� :`��: � � .-�. ■►� �� : : � . � I�, � �� /�L _• •�� ' 1r�� ' �� _ ..��n ��.� . !�.... : ` �� r ■ ■��' � �7 N it= �-�;��.��.■� a!III�;11\�� - = ■ v� /T�)ti7'� u r�� ''�. - �■� ►� �� ■ �� 1�1� `� �� 11�;�� \�� /� � . ►r � .. 1�t:.�� 1� �� ,= +�1'��'i�l� � +�� ' Gi i1►�� _._.. ��.�� +li��li�. ■. � I '- �t�� 1::�: �� F� � �i ii� �i� � � �: :%�1�1�1� i-��!.�I ,. I� '� ��: �1`� ��..��.n�. ��`�� II/►♦� � � �_ ��i��:iiii��:�;ii:iii �'��11 ,■r�iliii:!I � ■ I � ��''��'.a:J•�.� -�' �- __ := �II'II' ' � ' � -- • '�•..�.:-- ■ ■ � � -- ■1 � � �;'L;��ii ir�-� �� C■ 1■ I I r .•....mJ,�� 1,, .� .....,`: 7__ � �� 1� �� `��i� �� — � ��1�1�11� ��:� •�� ■� \ �il' i��s � 1 I••��/� ��,�! � �� — I' �� ,1 ',�� i �� i� ■� � ■ ,�� 1 ' �I� � �i i� — � � = r�� ,:,��%� � � i� �� ■�� . � /'� � i �i i� ■��■■ �7 - ■■�■��1 �■�,�i Iii� ■■��, � i Iii � �� .1II� ■ � ��!�IIII`ll:;il� ..'r:':;�;:!_�: :��: �►II�L , �:�� I_••� �►�=:�:: ::• . .. �-_ .. =%•�-�==- .. '.i�r� ' -�. .. ■ ��i� �i ��■I�I/ �� ,��t�� ■ � � ` ■Fa111�Ir��,■ il�►�� /■�Ci ii ._'_��1�� ;—�_ �� .- � � 1 11 � 11 . . / :.:::.:�:::;::..�::.::.::;c::::.:::.::::::>:::.:::.>:::: n �:. • � � . • � I , , � • .�.�� .. ��,. •�.. �.�� - - • • •• :• .. ' - � . . '„ ' ••. -• • :• •. EXHIBI'T F Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Designations Document2\ EXHIB IT G Existing Structures 1VIap Document2\ � d d ❑ 7 ��:- ��. ��:��>��. �� . ` �- ��.. zt;.• ,}, ��,��,��°�-��, '�� t �-,-`��-��,�.��< ��'��-��-:�: � � ��:�=:�.'�.�'�:r�. �� °�� , � _'��:�;-,��.�,s �� - ��" :��". � � 4 � �� ' ' _ �;,:-,�'"•_%'', � ,�,}'..� �.z :4'~��1 ^Y '� ..�i�H�' y p ':4� fi� � ��-`�� '�a�: t5 .'�. Y�1�"� ^ �ti. �! w�jy��+_"�, `�� ,'''zh• 3. �. � r�1cti I• '. L 4 ..�ia,�hw�'y � �g d->�'~r-��€'��"y�.' i'jF2�:ii-.E -.�: u #°�,�a'�g�i��'s�� `... .��'. �� 'iL.� � � � y,:n3w �i�sr�, ?,�� Yg'dj?s �:s��='�•:�?��'�'�`p s. �,; � �! � �`��'=:�;�°"'` ' �`��;�"��'�� _ ��.s� � � � n o � ur� � p �, SE 186th St Q � Q � � d � L� �1 � � � �1 c� � � 4 � � � � � � � � Q� � � , ❑ � � Q SE 188th St o � S a � � � Q� Q � �I � � o � � � � � � � a � F�i k An n ex�ti o n o 300 600 Exhibit G: Existing Structures 1•3 600 .�Y w Existing Structure ' ' �t o Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Shategic Planning .O♦ AlexPietsch,actingAdminishator �� Existing Corporate Boundary G.Del Rosano ��NTo 19December2002 - Proposed Annexation Boundary EXI-�IT I� Topography NYap for Falk Annexation Site Documentl\ ) �; / %I ',,/I�--�.��.�, "_,-J `��✓, �� _ i;'' ��J�y�\�\I\�� \1\`1�11 `\�� '%�j%%� J ' ;��lil . / �. ', /.•�I. � � ��i �� i /�, ;)�,��\, �J" / �� /� � I � \ 1��\\\\� \� � � // __�c.a / I r� r/�m•/,� i;;,'-- , /i '� � � �� I� \ ` �� - i/ ��"/ ��iil 1," l \ ,��: �\�. �,-/� � '�;,a ,� , i�, �� \\ � , \ I,I�;i "`4 �� .I� ,,. ��;��/�� :;�r.---'-%��-�%� � , � �;��l, ,\, ��,�,`` ��;� � ��/ /j- ��.� ''I�+ .,,, 1�I 1I�'x �T�I'\V. � i �� i� � � �_/� '��\\\\ t\\ �� I�� -� II i�� x 11 l�J � �< \ �\/� � �/ � 1 � l 1 ��\��, \ �L �, � C `/`/ / � �— I 11 i II �/.,',r„ \ r� V�'�. • � � / /, �: � \ ��`\\\\��\' \ �\\ l '�ll \ , 'i (I ll�;y,;;�/ �1�,�r;�-,;_ ,� ,,/J;��`�� %�= �) `�;�\�\��',��\\\�� /� ��'i �;',p, �i�l� ��;.%;;;�, 'i,<< �;� � ' °% �� \� S '� �\\ � �� ^ � �t � ��,:,,, � � / � � � �� \ �\ \�� ' � '"�� l�,�II., �,,-. ;,,�� '/,'�'� % � / I�'� � � �� `\��\�� - ' 1' w. , �,�� ,i�r� ; xf � ��.� �� ;� ��. �. ^ „�i,,. � ��,,�,��,�, ,,:��.�`,,�..��' �� ,,; ,�� ;,, ( �r �� \ ��\�� ;�l�'�� ;� � ;�• �� I ; / � I �� - \ �� , �,�. �J��;��, ,��`�y��-��'�� 1 :`; / �� -� ,�� \�\\��\\`�c� ,.��°�., � ,�� .�� r / � �� , � \\ � �� , i;. ,,,),,�.,� -� ,��, , ,,, ;: �� / , Jfr �� ,�, �.;��,��,, ��,,�:, . _ ��„�.��`� �.� � ,, ��,� i �f, � ��,. \O\� �� ,. ��- ��i// ;J�- ��`� �� J�' � � � �', � �—' �\\\��.��\� � � I`�. '�% � ,�^�;�--,�(�r+;�.�� J; I� / �'�",J_) I„� �j �/\\\\\�;�\�� ; �,`>>:1 /• � � �.[,1 e "��l` ��` �/�� / ' / r'� � / � \\\\\\_` � �� /��/.� '�i� \�`� `�" ��/`��/ � �.�1'. _ � �/� I � �'\�\\\\\\__ ��•i' �r �:�(� i , c u � r/ /_ � �� l l,� / -''��\ �� r il, •.�,I��l;:!�"�'��',��`;.I��y � �•' � /%/ � / ' � �S\��\\� \� �'��, I 1 �I��, �;, �,,� .,��i� -�- �� / '1,.�` ! ��r� �\ '� I� ( , �f l«-;,-,��-�-�� 1,� �////� � �' �� , .�, .. � .,r � ,��< _ � �iji�� -� � � � /��'� ��.� � �� I1ll �,., � �� , �;\ /��/�)�/llI';�� '''�'�;��y"l`�: _--__ - _:�� /l i�//� ,C _�. �� \ . — `�� 1\\I(l� / � �� \\� ��J��S � \ ,,, �� ";, l\�� -�� __ �%/ � ( , ,..,,\�� \1`�� /� y�'I ,,,� ��,`�,,...\� ,, r: ', �� \ 1 \ � � I ( \\\�''`� \��\,l f �II�►�� ',�� 1�7��,E�s ��'�; v� �� r� \� � � � � �� .�\1'i�� 1 � ,� l '�/ ; 1 .�; � � , l � �� \,;� �, I � � �� 1 ', ,��:,�� 'y;��'', ;'r' i J 7 � `� l ��--'� `\`;'4�' I 1VI �,��''!i;��' i I� ��(� �� / �' � � � a� I , �i�� I'�� A_—� \ \\°.`,. / /' . �, �I�� I ¢k hv � ;7�'nS.'�� . , �. X / rr / �J�4e 'I�IryII�� 11�1� �III � � � "' h.�y`;�. . ..� ,�;r,ie�N ° �� `� � ��/� v � \�\\��''� I � / � �S 'i;i' �ir; 'ii'�tj;',�i,�,: 1 I i ''J�.7;,,�, _u- '�•r:-.�,i,ry. . `W� � / 1'I I illjill'/.:. .11'i I � 1:+� �aN si�.�:wi�' '�'�'A t' • '��'..j,:.�� '"�' , �,-�, \. '�'!r II � I i �.' - x' x�v,.;x�� . • x � x �� `\\\\\ t� �� / ; a 1, � ,;.�,:J,,;�,�!�ii,,�, � , � ;.��;��=��;�:�:u�,��°_. .��t�� ;,��;:.:�� , � . '�' ' ��1`,.�� ~- , :: � 'I I� 'i / J a.s.r_ �. t'�, �a�' � . , �y3' �\�' y `t �,�� / ,/�4 +�`��=� :,ysC..� �\ - �! !��i'��i�il!I I'li�i�� r �� t'�: , , �,,'_''.''.sr�'s�,a�,� at��; d� � �. � q� i � /� ��';`,S . � 2'y �?`b�.ti� ; � : �"�' , � ��i�o �wII_�I „(1 � I / / ��,�L�� ,F� '_�„�*�,� "�!4,. ;�;.��;' "Ga �, i6,.��\, (�\�\ n i I I ( / y� ym�y;.. ' � J J ( � \ / ��'S�+{�•l]f� }1° j �' 9 2� '^I ^Ilx e '! % '�/ "n{'115�.-V t i 7 t�� .��"'iN ..i r6.7 y Y'k.. Ti 5 / /''��`1��II,� ��jl 1 / Y. �.F'�ax, �f x'!rttr,,.. 2•� ;�,s�'� yy a"�` � I� �L" � �I�I�I' �' ill'il F i �c�:'��.'W:��t _�;� r,�-� i�:,r-: � ;�?� x �x �i ' ��'�'��`��`�11�� {IIII�� '� � � ��.�� -�'�� 4��. ,� � `�A r� I �, i, ,, .�_ � � �' � r � , I �') I �� II � �_ I ::�,k� xt.:;�'.��-,�� .. '��; „ II �'�`14��`'l �, _ !I��f I I I I I 1 n ,P n„a�xr� �j.t;,": ''!R .t �� ,,�' ij��'��. �� I � l � 9 -w::•. �;.�.:�-� _ �, � � �'o � . I �I 1 1 �1111'?�� I t..,' �x: k1 s " � � ° 'iJl ��' Il �.�:�' _ J \ � :� x�� x I�I�f f 1,,1 II�i�� i'�r i�lW�� I I�! I �� \ � J /� � x� � x� � � I,I�►�!Ilil��I��► , �illli I � 1 � � � , �- o , �I,� 1� ��J,.!��.��. I I� � � 1 ) �/ 1 • � �� - . � .m ��d1+1��a�,� ,��., �,� ��1 l �._ ( �� ! . � x�. � e'�:I'�U'�r�:.�\I'V�, �� /_ / w , ,� ,��,� �l�l<« ��. I I �II / : . . � . � o �.-� � � ��3i�` �� ., E 8E�t ��- � � rI r`; ,�,\a, �� (�/.,.�j� �/� / ( � x Q + �M } I ,I��• '" • ��'� � i� �, � ■ � �' �.! � (i i �/ � " I ■ ■ �� e��/; ��(j!�Il,� 1 �- a ��` , . .,;u '' ` � � �a� w x � \ �� / ,�� ,. � � �- •o :� �. � �!� �, '�1� � 1 � " � . '�' 1\ \ �i � ��•.: a `( � cw on \ /� � �l� ,,��il�`��"�,\��1��, ) r �] < < � _, , �, j�,,i��.},,��.; ,� ,�; � -- 7 I�- \ � ��. ,�- f � ` �e1 .��1 \ii �1 1 �� \ V � ` / l I ` ,;;, � , ,, , .{,,��l1111 � l�` � � �_ m . � �i ..,�� ;�' � �, I \ �-.� � " l x" ,,\�1 � : , , � ��. � /_ ; )�\ �� , 1` /III' ` • r \��`�\ V � / \ / �. \ � \ H � � 11� ,`��.��.��,� �,, ,< < � I �� SEI 188th S°�t" � • \ , �� , \ .�o �� \�� ► .� - �� . � :.� i i w p� 1 �� \ �" � " \ll`� `1 i�I��I��'. ��\ \ �� \ x � � � �` �� ,!�,��,,�,��,, �,)��/� �1 � � • .� M � � � � �� ,,,�� ,�� ,��l�l • �� , `�` ,�.,`�, ,. 1 � ,�.�,'JII� \ v ; , � ��111�, , �� ; ;�i��i{��.� ,, �,, ��II�III) ,, �, ( �� . � �. ✓ 1 ��\\��;�.► ��,�`��,ll � ,,/�;�� ; � �, x �: � � � � �� x�. , ,��\\� ,�,,,j�,.� �,« i�l►�«�'�'{'�� ,, �1 � � x�- o � ' I I l.r�' ,II I+ Z � a. '( '� �, � � i �� i � �� (, ' � .� " � J � �I1., ' �'� 1\' \ \ ■ ■ � l/ � �, �� '�� ' ��' , X .,�//� �;rl 111�� `,;\��H ` 1 i�� ,�'��ll � .-�- � � ( f' � � �I II�I��•" /�I�i�l � 1��,�� 11� '�(`�� % � � x `" � � x • � � �I�lll.��..,,,,,�:��iii�� ;�I ��1��, � � . ti� ,� � ,I x� � R- � Falk Annexation ° 3°° 6°° Exhibit H: Topography 1:3,600 ,�Y 1 m Interval Contours Uti o�, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Shategic Planning .O� Alex Pietsc�ading Administrator �—� Existing Corporate Boundary G.Del Rosario ��NTo 19December2002 _� Proposed Annexation Boundary EXHIBIT I Sensitive Areas Map Document2\ \ S 7 �:�,�� -��'`�:?� °�:��'��::� .�=.5�. � �< �� T ��.��;� �.,,�;,�� r��.�� .:,��,��, ��'�'>��3ra �� ,a,�� ;��r��,�:.._�s.`'�"��,'��.��,��;�� .;`�� '�; .s.h^,�'�t:�3��, e1.•},,y E�<*- . �;r � , , Y�"y s' �a ' �7�, s'�'��?'';�',�' o�a;��,. - ;;�: � �,. '�" n,r�,,�4,� :��b� x�' - '��"�.'• x.� ��,�4�%'.�;;r�.K',-t.�ss�i� .,�. a� '�,o- �_ :� �ae�j,�.^^'�'e�T;�-..; 's x � #s ;��.,, � 'S°i.f�•`�s4..t 7;,r � ��,� %2r""•s'�`�._�,=':�� '�''.^., �� : ��ev?,��,�`,'�..�,. ' c '� � f"�''"t�....".-;;fir a ��#;�'� � '��• �� '�`"ii. ��''��r�'S.�,��,tr��a �` _- ?E7 .��::��`��` ��` � - - y, w,7".. "�- 'Ya,_. ! SE 186th St � > � � � 0 r, SE 188th St S � I i Falk Annexation ° 300 6°° Exhibit I: Sensitive Areas _ . . _ �itcn 1:3,600 �ti'�Y o Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �� Existing Corporate Boundary p O* Alex Pietsch,acting Administrator G.Del Rosacio � Proposed Annexation Boundary tt'N.�O 19 December 2002 CITY OF RENTON �i �- �. � Planning/Bui�'ublicWorks Departrnent — Gregg��mmerman P.E.,Administrator ]esse Tanner,Mayor February 12, 2003 Steven A. Beck 4735 NE 4�h St. Renton,WA 98059 SUBJECT: Falk Annexation and Rezone LUA-02-019,A,R,EC F Dear Mr. Beck: This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Deterrtaination of IVon-Significance -Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is finai and application for the appropri�tely required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. If you have any questions,.please feel free to contact me at (425)430-6581. For the Environmental Review Committee, Senior Planner Don Erickson cc: Nina Falk/Applicant J. & M. MacKenzie, L. Longo, J, & S. Claeys, R. McNair, D. Metts/Parties of Record ' 1055 South,.Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 � � l� � O � AH�AP OP 'CHE CUAd£ �This paperconlains 50%rocycled material,30°/postconsumer � • City of 1:. '�n Department of Planning/Building/Publi�=.._ :'��rks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPL1CATlON REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �I Ct✓l �V)�,,� COMMENTS DUE: 5:00 PM, FEBRUARY 22ND, 2002 APPLICATION NO: LUA-02-018,A, R �G(� DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 11,2002 APPLICANT: NINA FALK PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON,AICP PROJECT TITLE: FALK ANNEXATION WORK ORDER fVO: � LOCATION: S.47TH STREET& 102ND AVE SE ��Nr N SITE AREA: 13.66 ACRES BUILDING AREA ross : N/A /I/� SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed annexation and rezone of 13.66 acres north of Springbrook Sprin s Wate shec�fr King County's R-1 Zone to Renton's R-8 Zone. The site is accessed off of SE 192"d Street and overlooks the V�1 �r�rea in�i�. /��V�S%,�_ A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major lnformation Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Nousin Air Aesthetics Water Li hUGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans ortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoriclCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet //�..�(�,Q 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS �� C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS �� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,_� � a /a � Sign tu of Director or Aut orized Representative Date Routing. o Rev.10/93 City of ._.!Fon Department of P/anning/Building/Publiy_. .�arks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: a✓I�S COMMENTS DUE: 5:00 PM, FEBRUARY 22ND, 2002 z-�arti APPLICATION NO: LUA�,A, R �C� � DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 11,2002 APPLICANT: NINA FALK PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON,AICP PROJECT TITLE: FALK ANNEXATION WORK ORDER NO: � LOCATION: S.47T"STREET&102ND AVE SE SITE AREA: 13.66 ACRES I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed annexation and rezone of 1'3.66 acres north of Springbrook Sqrings Watershed from King County's R-1 Zone to Renton's R-8 Zone. The site is accessed off of SE 192"d Street and overlooks the Valley Area in Renton. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Proba6le Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housin Air Aesthetics Water Li hUGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans ortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Histodc/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet C�G�'Lc., � . U�✓�7�� c1' j�'�J�Y� � � � , , ., �� B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS � � �� o, C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS � �/t� �� G� � cv��T � �� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ' � �e 1�� Signature of Director or Aut orized Representative Date Routing.doc Rev.10/93 �m�� '� , , � . ��1 �''� �� • Use templ�te f�r 516�� _ t'.:�- �t�et/D�PP� I"P�t�,bn�s �� •el�� 322305916304 322305912402 - 322305910000 STECKLER MARTIN R&IRENE M LO ANDREW H K MCINTOSH ROBERT D+KATHRYN L 10012 SE 187TH ST 10035 SE 187TH ST 10104 SE 187TH ST RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 947600001004 947600020004 264140001001 SHEPPARD JOHN B STUTTGEN GLENN J BUI THU MAI+TAN DINH 10205 SE 185TH PL 10208 SE 185TH PL 10210 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 947600002002 947600019006 264140002009 REYES ALVIN A+LISA M NGUYEN RENE+TERESA+MICHAEL CHEA NORIN+PHANNY 10211 SE 185TH PL 10214 SE 185TH PL � 10216 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA RENTON WA REN'FON WA 98055 98055 98055 947600003000 947600018008 947600004008 VANNGUYEN JOHN+LIEU MCCABE JOHN H+NANCY D MARR JEFFRREY F+OFELIA 10217 SE 185TH PL 10220 SE 185TH PL 10223 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 947600017000 264140004005 947600005005 REEVES MARK T+FRANCINE P LOUIE KENNY S SHIEH WUNJANG K+SIOUMING L 10226 SE 185TH PL 10228 SE 186TH ST 10229 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 264140005002 264140046006 264140045008 DAVIS LARRY J DIMALANTA FRED J+CHRISTINE METTS DEBRA L 10234 SE 186TH ST 10335 SE 187TH PL 10339 SE 187TH PL RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 322305909705 322305928606 322305929802 AVZARADEL SOL GIBLER PAUL J+LOIS L CALAGIU GEORGETA 15722 SE 160TH PL 18404 102ND AVE SE 18414 102ND AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98058 98055 98055 322305909606 322305916205 322305917005 GUSTAFSON FRED E+DEBRA O MCNAIR REID H+MEGAN J 1 g 09 0 ND SE 18439 102ND AVE SE 18463 102ND AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 322305917609 322305917104 322305921403 KELLY CYNTHIA L MACKENZIE JOSEPH ENDZELL PAUL 18517 102ND AVE SE 18533 102ND AVE SE 18615 102ND AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 322305908509 322305926709 264140003007 GREENE HOMER L+EILEEN M TRU MALPHRUS THOMAS LE CINDY C/O RUTH W E 18616 102ND AVE SE 18713 102ND AVE SE 19222 108TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 ' 98055 98055 /1� ��o s�d��s� �.a��s �� 0� �r�� F��d ��T� - .� Us�tempQa�e foa 51�0� 322305932509 - 855920018006 -"�855920004006 MCCLELLAN H DONALD+MARY H SPECIALIZED HOMES CLAEYS JIM+SUSAN 2509 S 354TH AVE 3001 E YESLER WAY 4708 SMITHERS AV S FEDERAL WAY WA SEATTLE WA RENTON WA 98002 98122 98055 947600021002 312305908708 312305910001 � KING COUNTY SCHNEIDER HOMES I LLC BILSKI B LEE+ROXANNE H 500 K C ADMIN BLDG 6510 SOUTHCENTER BLVD STE 1 700 SOUTH SOTH ST SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA RENTON WA 98104 98188 98055 312305915000 312305910407 312305904905 FINK LAWRENCE E+SALLY J COOKS HENRY E BUTTON A I 709 S SOTH 712 S SOTH ST ' 715 S SOTH RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 855920015002 855920016000 322305902205 MACDONALD DOUGLAS M 1VIANGLA SANDEEP+PREETI SINGLA FALK NINA E 718 S 47TH ST 724 S 47TH ST PO BOX 112 RENTON WA RENTON WA BLACK DIAMOND WA 98055 98055 98010 312305909300 MOORE PAUL M PO BOX 5985 KENT WA 98064 4�J �CJt�t1K�O B'V�.tl�F1�� Fb�ko�� tl ��0 �... q .- • '4r� .� `i � . . ��'i/ 4�''r��t': - ,Cify Of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL.CHECKL/ST PURPOSE OF CHECKL/ST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapfer 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacfs on the qualify of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whefher an EIS is required. INSTRUCT/ONS FOR APPL/CANTS: This environmenfal checklist asks you to describe some basic informafion about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whefher the environmerital impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefu/ly, fo the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or "does not apply". Complete answers to fhe questions now may avoid unnecessary delays lafer. Some questions ask abouf governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designafions. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Aftach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional informafion reasonably related to determining if there may 6e significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklisf to the words "project," `'applicant,"and"property or site"should be read(��V�Cq�tA8�1�1"1"PLANNING 'proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. CITY OF RENTON FEB 0 � 2002 A. BACKGROUND V�� 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Proposed rezone of approximately 13.66 acre area from King County's R-1 Zone to Renton's Residential 8 du/ac (R-8) Zone. Zoning would be applied at the time the subject site is annexed into the City of Renton. � Falk Annexation Rezone �s _, February 6, 2002 Page 2 '' 2. Name of applicant: Susan Carlson, Administrator, Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning Department City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contacf person: Address: Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Department City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Contact Person: Don Erickson,AICP (425)430-6581 4. Date checklist prepared: February 6, 2002 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works - Development Services Division 6. Proposed fiming or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Adoption of the rezone ordinance is anticipated pending SEPA compliance, at the � time of annexation into Renton. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected wifh this proposaf? If yes, explain. Yes. Applicants have applied for annexation into the City of Renton. Under RCW 43.21.C.222 annexations are specifically exempt from SEPA. Upon annexation into Renton applicants or their successors will likely subdivide and develop vacant properties with single-family dwellings per the City of Renton's R-8 zoning. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. FEIS on the 1995 Comprehensive Plan of the City of Renton 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No knowledge of other pending governmental approvals of affected properties. Possible King County redesignation of Urban Separator to the west. 10., ., List any governmenta! approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if , " , - , , ;;known. Council approval is required for this rezone. � ,;;1,1.�-..�.� Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and � �� the size of the project and site. The subiect proposal is to rezone the non-street portions of the 13.66 acre Falk Annexation site from King County's R-1, 1 du/gross acre, to Renton's R-8, 8 du/net acre zone. The site could accommodate approximately 82 dwellings under Renton's R-8 Zone and approximately 13 dwellings under King County's R-1 Zone. Because their respective Comprehensive Plan land use designations are so far apart both jurisdictions are working together to come up with an acceptable resolution. ; . � . Falk Annexation Rezone .February 6, 2002 � Page 3 '� � �,� 12. LoCatlon of the pl'oposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject annexation site is located immediately south of Sou� 47th Street(in Renton) and extends approximately 720 to the south along 102° Avenue SE (in King County). Properties to the north and west of the site are in the City of Renton. (Please see attachments.) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flaf, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The 13.66 acre site is rolling being relatively flat in its middle and southeastern portions but slopes more steeplv to the west and its northeast corner. The western portion droqs about 30 feet and the northeast corner drops about 15 feet. B. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope?) Renton Slope Maps indicate some small areas with slopes of 25% c. What general types of soils are found on fhe site (for example, clay, sand, , gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify fhem and note any prime farmland. Alderwood Association. d. Are fhere surface indications or hisfory of unstable soils in the immediate vicinify? If sq describe. Althouqh there are 15% to 25% slopes on the site, these have not been mapped as unstable soils. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Not apqlicable for this non-project leaislative action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project proqosal. Erosion presumably could occur as a result of future development under the proposed R-8 Zone. Mitigation measures would be applied typically at the time of future development. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximatel rL35%. No construction is proposed as a result of this non- project legislative proposal. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: No construction is proqosed as a result of this non-project legislative rp oposal. Any future development occurring"as a consequence of the proposed R-8 Zone would be required to follow management practices in the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Regulations (RMC 4-4-130) and in the Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations (RMC 4-4-060). � Falk Annexation Rezone • . � February 6, 2002 ' Page 4 � 2. A/R a. What types of emissions to the air would result from fhe proposal(i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is complefed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quanfities if known. N/A. No new construction is proposed as a result of this legislative non- project proposal. At the time of project level development specific air-related impacts may be identified and appropriate mitigation measures applied. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Unknown. Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or ofher impacts to air, if any: Not applicable for this non-proiect leqislative action. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in fhe immediate vicinity of the sife (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, • ponds, weilands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriafe, state what stream or river it flows into. No. The annexation sits on a ridge overlooking the Renton Valley area. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to(within 200 feet) fhe described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface wafer or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A. No construction is proposed immediately as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 4) Wil1 the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantifies if known. N/A. No construction is proposed immediately as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note locafion on the site plan. No.The subject site is not mapped as part of the 1-year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials fo surtace waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. This is a non-project legislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this proposal. � Falk Annexation Rezone •February 6, 2002 � Page 5 b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general descripfion, purpose, and approximafe quantities if known. N/A. This is a non-project legislative action. The proposed rezone is not expected to result in the discharge or withdrawal of water that is not now occurring. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into fhe ground from sepfic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such sysfems, the number of houses fo be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected fo serve. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-proiect legislative rp oposal. No new septic tanks are anticipated as a result of this rezone. It is anticipated that development that may occur under the City's jurisdiction would connect to sanitary sewers. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collecfion and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A. No construction and therefore runoff is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. Surface water appears to run off the southern portion of the site in a southwesterly direction towards the lower Cedar River Basin and from the northwesterly portion of the site to the May Creek Basin. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. Future new residential development would be hooked up to sanitary sewer. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Not a�plicable since this is a non-proiect leqislative action. Future development allowed under the R-8 Zone would be required to comply with City of Renton Drainage Standards (RMC 4-6-030). 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree:alder, map/e, aspen, other X evergreen free: fir, cedar,pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture _ Falk Annexation Rezone � February 6, 2002 Page 6 � crop or grain wet soil plants:cattail, buftercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water planfs: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation wil!be removed or altered? N/A. No construction and therefore no vegetation will be removed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. Future development will have to comply with Renton's Tree Cutting regulations (RMC 4-4-130). c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known at this time. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Not applicable. This is a non-project action. As noted above, development that occurs under Renton's jurisdiction must conform to the City's codes and regulations. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds:hawk, heron, eagle son bird other Mammals:, ee bear, elk, beaver, other Fish:bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endanqered sqecies are known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Unknown, but the entire State of Washington is included within a migration route for birds known as the Pacific Flyway. This flyway, as it overlies Renton, is used by a variety of migratory birds, including, but not limited to the Canada Goose. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: This is a non-project leqislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this rezone proposal. Mitigation measures, if any, may be imposed at the time of future development. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used fo meet the complefed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. It is anticipated that the potential 82 dwellinq units the R-8 zonin�ould allow on the site will use primarily electircal and natural qas resources for heating and runninq appliances. . � Falk Annexation Rezone •February 6, 2002 � Page 7 b. Would your project affecf the potential use of solar energy by adjacenf properties? If so, generally describe. Unlikeiv Zoning provides some setbacks and restricts heights of new structures to 30 feet. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. This is a non-project leqislative action. Future development occurring on the site will meet all related energy code provisions. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HE�4LTH a. Are fhere any environmenfal health hazards, including exposure fo toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A. This is a non-project legislative action. No special services are anticipated from future single-family residential development. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Not applicable since this is a leqislative non-proiect action. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-ferm or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operafion, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from fhe site. Not applicable. New development occurring under the R-8 Zone could include construction activity and normal noise associated with ground related residential living. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. This is a non-project action. 8. LAND AND SHORELIiVE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The majority of the 13.66 acre site is either vacant or partial developed with lower density single family homes. Existing densities are not believed to exceed 3 du/ac. Has the sife been used for agriculture?If so, describe. No. c. Describe any strucfures on the site. � There are an estimated seven existinq single-familv dwellinqs on the subject 13.66 acre site. � Falk Annexation Rezone • �-, February 6, 2002 Page 8 ° d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? This is a legislative non-project rezone action. It is not anticipated that this proposed rezone will result in the demolition of any structures. e. What is the current zoning classification of fhe sife? The current Kinq Countv zoninc,Lclassification is the R-1 Zone which allows 1 du/gross acre. The current proposal is for R-8 zoning that allows 8 du/net acre. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the sife? The 13.66 acre site is currentiy designated "Residential Sinale Famil�' on Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and "GreenbelbUrban Separator" on King County's Comprehensive Plan Map. Renton's designation would allow zoning with up to 8 units per gross acre and King County's designation would allow zoning with only 1 unit per net acre. As a consequence the City and County are working together to resolve this issue. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designafion of the sife? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmenfally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Renton's Sensitive Areas Maps identify the subject site as having some 15% to 25% slopes in the southeastern portion of the site and in its northeastern corner. No erosion areas were identified. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? At full redevelopment under the proposed R-8 zoning, it is anticipated that aqproximatelv 185 residents would reside on these 13.66 acres. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Unknown. This is a non-project action. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable at this non-project stage. L Proposed measures to ensure the proposa! is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: As noted above the proposed rezone is consistent with the current Residential Single Family land use designation for the subject site. Discussions are underway with King County to possibly relocate their designated urban separator to the west to reflect the existing steep slopes between the plateau and the valley area below to the west. 9. HOUS/NG a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. . Unknown. It is anticipated that 82 dwelling units could be accommodated on the subject site under Renton's R-8 zoning. b. Approximafely how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate wheiher high, middle, or low-income housing. � ' Falk Annexation Rezone _ � .February 6, 2002 � Page 9 ; Unknown. The proposed rezone will not eliminate any units by itself. As future development occurs some existing structures may be replaced and/or relocated although this is not currently anticipated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: The proposed zoning is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and applicable policies for this area. 10. AESTHET/CS a. What is the tallesf heighf of any proposed structure(s), not including anfennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. No new development is specifically proposed as a result of this change in zoning classification. Heights of. residential structures are restricted to 30' in the proposed R-8 Zone b. What views in fhe immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Unknown. This is a non-project rezone action. This is not known at this level. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Unknown. At the future project level impacts will be assessed and mitigated. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of lighf or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Could lighf or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere wifh views? � � Unknown. Future single-family homes are not anticipated to result in glare that would impair views from surrounding properties. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Unknown. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? A new City park is anticipated to be build on the former Cleveland property near SE 192"d and South Talbot Road to the west. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No.This is a non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including � recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable at this non-qroiect level of review. ' Falk Annexation Rezone � February 6, 2002 Page 10 ' 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATIOIV a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nafional state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to fhe site? If so, generally describe. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Unknown. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Th� site is primarily served by 102"d Avenue SE and secondarily by South 47' Street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance fo the nearest transit stop? Not directiv, however there is bus service on Carr Road, some 1,000 feet to the north. c. How many parking spaces wou/d the comp/eted project have? How many would the project eliminate? Unknown. Assuming 82 dwelling units and parking being provided between 1.75 spaces per unit and 2.25 spaces per unit, there potentially could be between 144 and 185 required off-street spaces developed over the 13.66 acre site. No spaces are anticipated to be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or sfreets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, general/y describe (indicate whether public or private? Potentiallv. Future subdivisions would be required to comply with City regulations pertaining to street width, curbs, sidewalks, lighting, etc. At this point it is difficult to anticipate what changes 75 new dwellings in the Falk Annexation area would require. New streets would most likely be local access streets or cull de sacs. e. Wil! the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally descri6e. No. f. How many vehicular frips per day would be generated by fhe completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. This is a legislative non-project action in which transportation impacts have not been identified since the actual levels of development are still unknown. However, if 75 additional units were built, and assuming 10 AWDVTE, there could be as many as 750 additional vehicles trip ends per 24 hour period (375"in", 375"out"). - � Falk Annexation Rezone � •February 6, 2002 : Page ll �J� ' g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not applicable at this non-proiect level. Level of future development is speculative at this point. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the projecf result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, ofher)? If so, generally describe. Probablv. Residential development that might occur in the future would increase the need for public services that typically serve such development. Affected services may include, but would not be limited to, fire protection, police protection, emergency services, and schoois. b. Proposed measures to reduce or confrol direct impacfs on public services, if any. The Citv of Renton currently collects mitiqation fees to control such impacts to parks and recreation, fire, and transportation. The City also collects taxes for most of these services. Untii a specific proposal is made at the project level, however, it is too early to ascertain what these impacts, if any, will be. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. The current proposal is a non-project action. However, the area it would apply to appear to be served by sewer, telephone, electricity, and water. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, fhe utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Unknown. Non-project action. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: G��0 A�'�'`1/ � Name Printed: ��"`�' n �� Date: �� ^ '�-��' 1 � Falk Annexation Rezone •, ---., February 6, 2002 Page 12 , D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpfu! to read them in conjuncfion with the/isf of the elemenfs of the environmenf. When answering fhese questions, be aware of fhe exfent the proposal, or the types of activities likely fo result from the proposal, would atfect fhe item at a greater intensity or at a fasfer rate than if fhe proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in genera!terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or re/ease of toxic or hazardous substances; or, producfion of noise? This is a legislative non-proiect rezone action that is not anticipated by itself to change operations at the subject,site or increase substance discharges into the environment. Subsequent development, whether under the current County R-1 zoning or the proposed City of Renton R-8 zoning, would be required to comply with SEPA at the time of development, unless categorically exempt. Any new development will likely increase discharges to air, water, etc. These, however, are anticipated to be relatively small. Proposed measures fo avoid or reduce such increases are: This non-project legislative action. Subsequent development as a result of this proposed code amendment will have to go through environmental review unless SEPA exempt. It is likely that air emissions, etc. would be addressed at this time when type and quantities of discharges are more likely to be known. Because Renton's R-8 Zone would allow greater densities than King County's R-1 Zone, impacts will be greater but still be manageable. 2, How would fhe proposal be likely to affecf planfs, animals, fish, or marine life? No significant impacts to plants, animals, fish or marine life are anticipated to occur as a consequence of the proposed zoning action. The proposal would supplant existing County R-1 single-family zoning which allows 1 du/ac (gross) with R-8 single-family zoning, which allows 8 du/ac (net). As a result future development could be as much as six times denser than what is now allowed. Proposed measures to protecf or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Not applicable. 3. How wou/d the proposal be likely fo deplete energy or natural resources? This non-project legislative action will not directly impact energy or natural resources. Future single-family development will, however, likely result in some additional demand of such resources. Future development under Renton's R-8 zoning would allow up to 75 additional homes in the area. The County's R-1 Zone would allow approximately 7 new units. As a consequence the proposed zoning change would potentially increase the demand for energy and natural resources. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None are proposed, since this is currentiv a non-project action. n � . Falk Annexation Rezone ___ " �February 6, 2002 : Page 13 � , 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threafened or endangered species habifaf, historic or culfural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? This non-project rezone proposal will not directly impact environmentally sensitive areas. There are some steep slopes of 25% pr greater on portions of the site. It is anticipated that future development will plan around these areas. Whether future development occurs under County or City zoning these sensitive areas would have to be addressed. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None proposed at fhis time for this non-project action. 5. How would the proposal be likely fo affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatihle with existing plans? � This proposed non-project rezone will not directly affect land or shoreline use with � new development. The proposed R-8 Zone, however, implements the Residential Single Family land use designation which allows single-family housing at 8 du/net acre. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None proposed at this non-proiect level. As noted above any new development under the proposed R-8 zoning will be reviewed by the City to ensure compliance with relevant state and local regulations. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportafion or public services and utilities? This is a legislative non-project action. Future development would result in increased � demands on transportation, the use of utilities, or other services over what is allowed under current King County zoning. If additional homes are built in this area as many as 750 additional vehicle trips per day could be generated over a 24 hour period. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: � None are proposed for this non-project action. Future development will be asked to mitigate any identified significant impacts. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environmenf. No conflicts with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment are known to exist with the subject non-project legislative proposal. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. . It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ��"'��":'ei�jG� �,1�r� Name Printed: ' �'��'�' � �J�� . Date: �t-� d; ��G��2' - . � � . S17th 167 S 43� St � G�� P O� 45t , ' t, .:��F,.: %�� :�� %' _ � / � � i � O � � - � �-- 6' � 1 t h `�' 55th St � > � .� � Falk A� nexation � 600 1200 Exhibit 1: Vicnity Map 1:7,200 Gti�Y o,t, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning +�d Sue Carlson,Admioistrator �� Existing Corporate Boundary G.Del Rosario ��NT�$ 3January2001 Proposed Annexation Boundary . �' � � � FALK ANNEXATION I,EGAL DESCRIPTION The Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 32, . Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the North quarter (1/4) of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32; and TOGETHER WITH the West 30 feet of the North three-quarters (3/4) of the East half (1/2) of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32, lying north of the South 165 feet thereof. .�,�_ �� • ' • • CITY OF RENTON DE�/ELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIOfV LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: �� G��/��,��a / PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAM : %� ��/� A�tIn��D� . ADDRESS: PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: ��n: s. �� `oa�� E��►'MENT p�,q �. N TELEPHONE NUMBER: Fr� 0 8 �p ry KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): C L�¢j2 / � �� `S� APPLICANT (if other �� EXISTI�G��Np� E(S): ��o-��/� NAME: �y C �L� {��'J//�f � �/�/� PROPOSED LA D USE(S): ��G�'��G,�f�^ COMPANY(if applicable): ' ��y�� / , EXISTING COM�HE SIV�LA��FIZ�Q�N��G'�. ADDRESS: �g¢�� /O��e� � Gi�F�! i PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: ��/�� /�l ZIP: ��,y� (if applicable): �/��,�Z S/Jt/I�GG� �I71/GY � TELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING ZONING: �--� (�//J �7!) PROPOSED ZONING(if applicable): �� i CONTACT PERSON _ SITE AREA (in square feet): �9� �� NAME:� �� i�� SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED , FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE(if applicable): ,,,�� COMPANY(if applicable): /I��/ � ��`l�� Gl��`/�7 � ��' � + G��%//!�'1 Ci / � ��S¢7 ��' PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ADDRESS: !`2�?"G�fI �'il� ��'L ACRE (if applicable): /d�� ,e,00DY CvAY NUMB R OF PROPOSED LOTS(if pplicabl }:, CITY: ��/ ��/N ' ZIP: �j�� L/�1��0� ��J �U�� Q�0>'I / NUMBER F NEW DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): TELEP NE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: /� � !r-��G�S � c�:��t�•�v�- �s masterap.doc Revised January 2002 • r� A� PkVJECT INFORMATION continu'ed � � �,- NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: W � SQU RE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL ,, �/ IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS(if applicable): �y(/� ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL �j� BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): �� ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE �/� SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREATWO BUILDINGS(if applicable): � ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq.ft. SQUARE F.00TAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL � GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq.ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): � ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq.ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq.ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if ❑ WETLANDS sq.ft. applicable): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE,�/� ' NEW PROJECT(if applicable): �� LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following�information included) SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION_,TOWNSHIF , RANGE , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. .. -- '� � TYPE OF APPLICATION�&� FEES Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees. �ANNEXATION(A) $ /IJO GH{�� SHORELINE REVIEWS � COMP PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA) $ ' CONDITIONAL USE(SM-C) $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CU-A,CU-H) $ EXEMPTION(SME) $ NO CHARGE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF) $ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT(SM) $ GRADE&FILL PERMIT(GF) $ VARIANCE(SM-V) $ (No.Cu.Yds: ) $ REZONE(R) $ SUBDIVISION ROUTINE VEGETATION $ BINDING SITE PLAN(BSP) $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT(RVMP) FINAL PLAT(FP) $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL(SA-A,SA-H) $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT(LLA) $ SPECIAL PERMIT(SP) $ PRELIMINARY PLAT(PP) $ TEMPORARY PERMIT(TP) $ SHORT PLAT(SHPL-A,SHPL-H) $ VARIANCE(V-A,V-H,V-B) $ (from Section: ) $ Postage: $ WAIVER(W) $ TOTAL FEE $ OT R: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name) �� • , declare that I am (please check one) _the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization)and that the foregoing and answers r in con ' ed d the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that � signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Signature of C�/Representative) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington (Signature of Owner/Representative) Notary(Print) My appointment expires: masterap.doc Revised January 2002 A �/ �� `� � ;'y \) G � � ` � s � � tn 167 S 43�St �� G �� P O° - 45t , � � � � � � 0 � � _ � �— 6, � 1 t h `f' ; 55th S� � � > � � a� Falk Ar� nex�t�on � 600 1200 Exhibit 1: Vicnity Map 1:7 200 � Gti�� o,� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � � � SucCazlsoqAdministrator �a�+�`� Existing Corporate Boundary G.Dcl Rosario Proposed Annexation Boundary ��N.ipZ 3]anuary2001 .y . � � � e FALK ANNEXATIOloi LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of tlie Southwest quarter of Section 32, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the North quarter(1/4) of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32; and ' � TOGETHER WITH the West 30 feet of the North three-quarters (3/4) of the East half (1/2) of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32, lying north of the South 165 feet thereof. ,, � � 6 32230�-9096 322305 9097 322305 9097 Gustafson,Fred and Debra Taylor,Lolin and Jacki Avzaradel,Solomaon and Mary 18437 102°d Avem�e SE 13530 476`h Avenue SE 15722 SE 160°'Place Renton, WA 98055 North Bend,WA 98045 Renton,WA 98058 322305-9097 322305-9097 322305-9022 Ruddell,Rebeno Ruddell,Susan L. Falk,Nina E. 3717 Beach Drive SW,#109 88 Virgia,Suite#23 18415 102°d Avenue SE Seattle,WA 99116 Seattle,WA 98101 Renton,WA 98055 . .; � /' r- - l • � � ' fi .1 � , . Oity.'Of.Renfon , . . , NMENTAL.C ' " � ENIc , � . �.::.. .. r: : . . , , , IRO, . , HECKC/ST:. .. . PURPOSE OF CHECKL/ST: The State Environmental Policy Acf (SEPA), Chapfer 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider fhe environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significanf adverse impacts on the quality of the environmeni. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information fo help you and fhe agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whefher an EIS is required. lNSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklisf asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklisf to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparafion of an EIS. Answer the quesfions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to fhe best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without fhe need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer fhese quesfions if you can. If you have � problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency fo which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions (acfions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references � in the checklist to the words "project,""applicant,"and 'property or site"should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. DEVELOpME � CIN OF RE�ON�NG A. BACKGROUND F�p��1 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: ec 1�C Proposed rezone of approximately 13.66 acre area from King County'RG Z�fe�tlr� Renton's Residential 8 du/ac (R-8)Zone. Zoning would be applied at the time the subject site is annexed into the City of Renton. Falk Annexation Rezone February 6, 2002 � . Page 2 • 2. Name of applicant: Susan Carls�n, Administrator, Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Department City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Address: Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Department City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Contact Person: Don Erickson, AICP (425) 430-6581 4. Date checklist prepared: February 6, 2002 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works - Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): - Adoption of the rezone ordinance is anticipated pending SEPA compliance, at the time of annexation into Renton. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. Applicants have applied for annexation into the City of Renton. Under RCW 4321.C.222 annexations are specifically exempt from SEPA. Upon annexation into Renton applicants or their successors will likely subdivide and develop vacant properties with single-family dwellings per the City of Renton's R-8 zoning. 8. Lisf any environmental informafion you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, direcfly related to this proposal. FEIS on the 1995 Comprehensive Plan of the City of Renton 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals direct/y affecfing fhe property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No knowledge of other pending governmental approvals of affected properties. Possible King County redesignation of Urban Separator to the west. 10. List any governmental approva/s or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. , . ��-`�_ Council approval is required for this rezone. ��;1'1. ;, '. GiVe brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the projecf and site. The subiect proposal is to rezone the non-street portions of the 13.66 acre Falk ' Annexation site from King County's R-1, 1 du/gross acre, to Renton's R-8, 8 du/net acre zone. The site could accommodate approximately 82 dwellings under Renton's R-8 Zone and approximately 13 dwellings under King County's R-1 Zone. Because their respective Comprehensive Plan land use designations are so far apart both jurisdictions are working together to come up with an acceptable resolution. ,i . Falk Qnnexation Rezone ' , `�,ebruary 6, 2002 � Page 3 � � 12. Location of the proposal. Gi�e sufficienr information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of ihe site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicin'ity map, and topographic map, if reasonab/y availab/e. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed . plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checkfist. � The subject annexation site is located immediately south of South 47ih Street (in Renton) and extends approximately 720 to the south along 102"d Avenue SE (in King County). Properties to the north and west of the site are in the City of Renton. (Please see attachments.) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The 13.66 acre site is rollinq being relativelv flat in its middle and southeastern portions but slopes more steeqlv to the west and its northeast corner. The western portion drons about 30 feet and the northeast corner droqs about 15 feet. B. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximafe percent slope?) Renton Slope Maps indicate some small areas with slopes of 25% c. What general fypes of soils are found on the sife (for example, clay, sand, , • gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and nofe any prime farmland. Alderwood Association. d. Are there surface indicafions or history of unstable soils in the immediafe , vicinity? If so, describe. � Althouqh there are 15% to 25% slopes on the site these have not been mapped as unstable soils. e. Describe the purpose, fype, and approximate quantifies of any filling or grading proposed. lndicate source of fill. Not aqqlicable for this non-project legislative action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? lf so, generally describe. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project proposal. Erosion presumably could occur as a result of future development �under the proposed R-8 Zone. Mitigation measures would be applied typically at the time of future development. g. Abouf what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 35%. No construction is proposed as a result of this non- project legislative proposal. h. Proposed measures fo reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the ; earth, if any: No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative rp oposal. Any future development occurring as a consequence of the proposed R-8 Zone would be required to follow management practices in the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Regulations (RMC 4-4-130) and in the Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations (RMC 4-4-060). Falk Annexation Rezone � ' �� February 6, 2002 � . Page 4 � 2. A/R a. What types of emissions fo fhe air would result from the proposal(i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is complefed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A. No new construction is proposed as a result of this legislative non- project proposal. At the time of project level development specific air-related impacts may be identified and appropriate mitigation measures applied. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Unknown. Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures fo reduce or,control emissions or ofher impacfs fo air, if any: Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any su►face wafer body on or in fhe immediate vicinify of the site (including year-round and seasonal sfreams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriafe, sfate what stream or river it flows into. No. The annexation sits on a ridge overlooking the Renton Valley area. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to(wifhin 200 feef) the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material fhat would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site fhat would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A. No construction is proposed immediately as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general descripfion, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A. No construction is proposed immediately as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note locafion on fhe site plan. No. The subject site is not mapped as part of the 1-year floodplain. 6) Does fhe proposa! involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. This is a non-project legislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this proposal. Fa1k;Annexation Rezone � y ��ebruary 6, 2002 ;. Page 5 ' �- '`�� b. Ground Wafer: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will wafer be discharged to ground wafer? Give general description, purpose, and approximafe quantities if known. N/A. This is.a non-project legislative action. The proposed rezone is not expected to result in the discharge or withdrawal of water that is not now occurring. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from sepfic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domesfic sewage;indusfrial, containing the following chemicals...;agriculfural; etc.). Describe the general size of fhe system, the number of such sysfems, fhe number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans fhe system(s)are expected fo serve. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative rp oposal. No new septic tanks are anticipated as a result of this rezone. It is anticipated that development that may occur under the City's jurisdiction would connect to sanitary sewers. c. Water Runoff(including sform water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of � collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will fhis water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A. No construction and therefore runoff is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. Surface water appears to run off the southern portion of the site in a southwesterly direction � towards the lower Cedar River Basin and from the northwesterly portion of the site to the May Creek Basin..: 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not aqplicable. Future new residential development would be � hooked up to sanitary sewer. d. Proposed measures fo reduce or confrol surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Not applicable since this is a non-proiect legislative action. Future development allowed under the R-8 Zone would be required to comply with City of Renton Drainage Standards (RMC 4-6-030). I 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle fypes of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree:alder, maple, aspen, other � X evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture Falk Annexation Rezone � February 6, 2002 • . Page 6 � crop or grain wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or a/tered? N/A. No construction and therefore no vegetation will be removed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. Future development will have to comply with Renton's Tree Cutting regulations (RMC 4-4-130). c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known at this time. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Not applicable. This is a non-project action. As noted above, development that occurs under Renton's jurisdiction must conform to the City's codes and regulations. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and anima/s which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near ihe site: Birds:hawk, heron, eagle son bird�s other Mammals:, ee bear, elk, beaver, other Fish:bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endanqered species are known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Unknown, but the entire State of Washington is included within a migration route for birds known as the Pacific Flyway. This flyway, as it overlies Renton, is used by a variety of migratory birds, including, but not limited to the Canada Goose. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: This is a non-proiect legislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this rezone proposal. Mitigation measures, if any, may be imposed at the time of future development. 6. ENERGYAND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. It is anticipated that the potential 82 dwellina units the R-8 zoninq would allow on the site will use primarily electircal and natural qas resources for heating and runninq appliances. Falk;Annexation Rezone �ebruary 6, 2002 . Page 7 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. Unlikelv. Zoning provides some setbacks and restricts heights of new structures to 30 feet. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures fo reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. This is a non-proiect legislative action. Future development occurring on the site will meet all related energy code provisions. 7. ENVIROIVMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A. This is a non-project legislative action. No special services are anticipated from future single-family residential development. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:tratfic, equipment, operation, other)? Not applicable since this is a legislative non-project action. 2) What fypes and levels of noise would be created by or associated wifh the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: fraffic, consfruction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. New development occurring under the R-8 Zone could include construction activity and normal noise associated with ground related residential living. 3) Proposed measures fo reduce or control noise impacfs, if any: None. This is a non-project action. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The majority of the 13.66 acre site is either vacant or partial developed with lower density single family homes. Existing densities are not believed to exceed 3 du/ac. Has the site been used for agriculture?If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are an estimated seven existing sinqle-familv dwellinqs on the subject 13.66 acre site. Falk Annexation Rezone February 6, 2002 • . Page 8 ` d. Will any strucfures be demolished? If so, what? This is a legislative non-project rezone action. It is not anticipated that this proposed rezone will result in the demolition of any structures. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current Kinq County zoning classification is the R-1 Zone which allows 1 du/gross acre. The current proposal is for R-8 zoning that allows 8 du/net acre. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The 13.66 acre site is currently designated "Residential Sinqle Famil�' on Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and "GreenbelUUrban Separator" on King County's Comprehensive Plan Map. Renton's designatiori would allow zoning with up to 8 units per gross acre and King County's designation would allow zoning with only 1 unit per net acre. As a consequence the City and County are working together to resolve this issue. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designafion of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? Ifso, specify. Renton's Sensitive Areas Maps identify the subject site as having some 15% to 25% slopes in the southeastern portion of the site and in its northeastern corner. No erosion areas were identified. i. Approximately how many people wou/d reside or work in the comp/eted projecf? At full redevelopment under the proposed R-8 zoning, it is anticipated that approximatelv 185 residents would reside on these 13.66 acres. j. Approximately how many people would the complefed project displace? Unknown. This is a non-project action. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable at this non-project stage. l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compafible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: As noted above the proposed rezone is consistent with the current Residential Single Family land use designation for the subject site. Discussions are underway with King County to possibly relocate their designated urban separator to the west to reflect the existing steep slopes between the plateau and the valley area below to the west. 9. HO USING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Unknown. It is anticipated that 82 dwelling units could be accommodated on the subject site under Renton's R-8 zoning. b. Approximately how many unifs, if any, would be e/iminated? Indicate whether high, midd/e, or low-income housing. Falk Annexation Rezone �'iebruary 6, 2002 ; Page 9 Unknown. The proposed rezone will not eliminate any units by itself. As future development occurs some existing structures may be replaced and/or relocated although this is not currently anticipated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: The proposed zoning is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and applicable policies for this area. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. No new development is specifically proposed as a result of this change in zoning classification. Heights of. residential structures are restricted to 30' in the proposed R-8 Zone b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Unknown. This is a non-project rezone action. This is not known at this level. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Unknown. At the future project level impacts will be assessed and mitigated. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would if mainly occur? Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Unknown. Future single-family homes are not anticipated to result in glare that would impair views from surrounding properties. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Unknown. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? A new City park is anticipated to be build on the former Cleveland property near SE 192"d and South Talbot Road to the west. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No.This is a non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable at this non-proiect level of review. Falk Annexation Rezone February 6, 2002 � . Page 10 � 13. HISTORIC,4ND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known fo be on or next to the site? !f so, generally describe. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or nexf to the site. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Unknown. 14. TR,4NSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the sife, and describe proposed access to the existing street sysfem. Show on site p/ans, if any. Th� site is primarily served by 102"d Avenue SE and secondarily by South 47t Street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not directiv, however there is bus service on Carr Road, some 1,000 feet to the north. �� -,c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many -� _"` would the project eliminate? � > �� Unknown. Assuming 82 dwelling units and parking being provided between ��t� (_�� 1.75 spaces per unit._and 2.25 spaces per unit, there potentially could be ? ,/��' between 144 and 185 required off-street spaces developed over the 13.66 � acre site. No spaces are anticipated to be eliminated. � � �, Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to � . ;� �j existing roads or sfreets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? � ° Potentiallv. Future subdivisions would be required to comply with City regulations pertaining to street width, curbs, sidewalks, lighting, etc!At this point it is difficult to anticipate what changes;75 new dwellings in the Falk Annexation area would require. New streets would most likely be local access streets or cull de sacs. " e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air fransportation? !f so,generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by fhe completed project? If known, indicate when peak vo/umes would occur. This is a legislative non-project action in which transportation impacts have not been id'en�ified since the actual levels of development are still unknown. However, �f 7/5 additional units were built, and assuming 10 AWDVTE, there could be a`s'many as 750 additional vehicles trip ends per 24 hour period (375 "in", 375 "out"). , Fa1k;Annexation Rezone ` �ebruary 6, 2002 � Page 11 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not applicable at this non-proiect level. Level of future development is speculative at this point. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Probablv. Residential development that might occur in the future would increase the need for public services that typically serve such development. Affected services may include, but would not be limited to, fire protection, police protection, emergency services, and schools. b. Proposed measures to reduce or confrol direct impacts on public services, if any. The City of Renton currently collects mitiqation fees to control such impacts to parks and recreation, fire, and transportation. The City also collects taxes for most of these services. Until a specific proposal is made at the project level, however, it is too early to ascertain what these impacts, if any, will be. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currenfly available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. The current proposal is a non-project action. However, the area it would apply to appear to be served by sewer,telephone, electricity, and water. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinify which might be needed. Unknown. Non-project action. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. - Proponent: ��ic�dl��/0?�fi'�.�.� Name Printed: ��```� n L�J�� Date: �'� �r '�-C�� — � �-�. . Falk Annexation Rezone ' � ` February 6, 2002 ' � Page 12 " D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACT/ONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need fo fil!out fhese sheets for projecf actions.) Because these questions are very general, if may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of fhe elements of fhe environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the ifem at a greater infensity or at a faster rate fhan if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or. production of noise? This is a legislative non-project rezone action that is not anticipated by itself to change operations at the subject site or increase substance discharges into the environment. Subsequent development, whether under the current County R-1 zoning or the proposed City of Renton R-8 zoning, would be required to comply with SEPA at the time of development, unless categorically exempt. Any new development will likely increase discharges to air, water, etc. These, however, are anticipated to be relatively small. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: This non-project leqislative action. Subsequent development as a result of this proposed code amendment will have to go through environmental review unless SEPA exempt. It is likely that air emissions, etc. would be addressed at this time when type and quantities of discharges are more likely to be known. Because Renton's R-8 Zone would allow greater densities than King County's R-1 Zone, impacts will be greater but still be manageable. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? No significant impacts to plants, animals, fish or marine life are anticipated to occur as a consequence of the proposed zoning action. The proposal would supplant existing County R-1 single-family zoning which allows 1 du/ac (gross) with R-8 single-family zoning, which allows 8 du/ac (net). As a result future development could be as much as six times denser than what is now allowed. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Not applicable. 3. How wou/d the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? This non-project legislative action will not directly impact energy or natural resources. Future single-family development will, however, likely result in some additional demand of such resources. Future development under Renton's R-8 zoning would allow up to 75 additional homes in the area. The County's R-1 Zone would allow approximately 7 new units. As a consequence the proposed zoning change would potentially increase the demand for energy and natural resources. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None are proposed, since this is currently a non-project action. � Fa1k�Annexation Rezone , � ,aebruary 6, 2002 , Page 13 -- - � 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wrild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? . This non-project rezone proposal will not directly impact environmentally sensitive areas. There are some steep slopes of 25% pr greater on portions of the site. It is anticipated that future development will plan around these areas. Whether future development occurs under County or City zoning these sensitive areas would have to be addressed. Proposed measures to protecf such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None proposed at this time for this non-project action. 5. How wou/d the proposal be likely fo affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompafib/e with exisfing plans? This proposed non-project rezone will not directly affect land or shoreline use with new development. The proposed R-8 Zone, however, implements the Residential Single Family land use designation which allows single-family housing at 8 du/net acre. Proposed measures fo avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None proposed at this non-project level. As noted above any new development under the proposed R-8 zoning wili be reviewed by the City to ensure compliance with relevant state and local regulations. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? This is a legislative non-project action. Future development would result in increased. demands on transportation, the use of utilities, or other services over what is allowed under current King County zoning. If additional homes are built in this area as many as 750 additional vehicle trips per day could be generated over a 24 hour period. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: None are proposed for this non-project action. Future development will be asked to mitigate any identified significant impacts. 7. Identify, if possib/e, whether the proposa/ may conflict with /ocal, state, or federal laws or requirements for the profection of the environment. No conflicts with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment are known to exist with the subject non-project legislative proposal. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Pro onent: i'�-^'��'�2��I�t� - � p Name Printed: ' ,��' u �J'`�"�� Date: r-�.`C-�-�'. ?i ��G�t�'vr \ � � � � S17th 167 S 43� St G�� P O� 45t � � � i � . � � � 0 � � _ � �-- � � 1 th `f' 55th St � > � � a� Falk A� n�exation � 600 1200 Exhibit 1: Vicnity Map 1:7,200 Uti�Y o,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning a0+ Sue Carlson,Administrator �� Existing Corporate Boundary G.Del Rosario Pro osed Annexation Bounda �t�NTO$ 3 January 2Q01 �� P f�/ y � 6 FALK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 32, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the North quarter (1/4) of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32; and TOGETHER WITH the West 30 feet of the North three-quarters (3/4) of the East half (1/2) of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32, lying north of the South 165 feet thereof. � � CIT�' OF REII�TTT01� PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WOIZKS MEMORANDUlVI DATE: February 4, 2003 TO: Don Erickson FROM: Sonja J. Fesser SUBJECT: Bales and Falk Annexations by Election Process Legal Descriptions The legal descriptions for the above referenced annexations are attached for your use. Please note that the legal description for the Bales annexation excludes the street(NE 4t�' Street) because said street became city right of way as part of the Morrison annexation. The map e�chibit will need to show this exclusion. Also, note that the legal description for the Falk annexation includes street right-of-way adjoining (102id Ave SE). The map e�chibit will need to include this portion of street right of way. Please notify me if any changes are needed. \I;\BALEFALK.doc . . _ Holly Graber- 11-24-03.doc _� � ....�_. . . � .. .. .. .... _. _ . ... Page 2 >^ A � November 24,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 2 RENTON CITY COUNCIL � Regular Meeting i November 24,2003 Council Chambers ; Monday,7:30 p.m. M I N U T E S Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER,Council President;TERRI BRIERE;KING COUNCILIVIEMBERS PARKER;DON PERSSON;RANDY CORMAN;TONI NELSON;DAN CLAWSON. � CITY STAFF IN JESSE TANNER,Mayor;JAY COVINGTON,Chief Administrative Officer; � ATTENDANCE LAWRENCE J.WARREN,City Attorney;BONNIE WALTON,City Clerk; � GREGG ZIMMERMAN,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator;LYS i HORNSBY,Utility Systems Director;ALEX PIETSCH,Economic Development Administrator;ELAINE GREGORY,Fiscal Services Director; SYLVIA DOERSCHEL,Finance Analyst Supervisor;JILL MASUNAGA, : Finance Analyst;DON ERICKSON,Senior Planner;DEREK TODD,Assistant � � to the CAO;COMMANDER KENT CURRY,Police Department. � PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in i Budget: 2004 Annual City of accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing ; Renton to consider the proposed 2004 City of Renton Budget. � Sylvia Doerschel,Finance Analyst Supervisor,reported that the total proposed � 2004 Budget for the City of Renton is$145,700,500,a 2.3 percent increase above the 2003 Budget. She noted that the General Governmental Funds, � which represent the general services offered to citizens,are in the amoun[of � $65,920,600. Ms.Doerschel indicated that the proposed 2004 Budget ': maintains the 2003 levels of service, and staffing changes add 8.1 full time i equivalent(part time/temporary)employees due to the opening of the Henry Moses Aquatic Center. Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCII,CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. i CARRIED. � This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in � �;,, � - accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public hearin� to consider the proposed annexation and R-8 (Residential-eight dwelling units L��s�p a_ (7 �9 per net acre)zoning of 6.43 acres,including the abutting 102nd Ave.SE right- ; of-way,bounded by S.47th St. to the north, SE 185th Pl.to the south, and ; 102nd Ave.SE to the east(Falk Annexation). I Senior Planner pon Erickson reported that the first public hearing on this � matter was held on January 27,2003;subsequently,the Boundary Review � Board approved the annexation on April 11,2003,and voters unanimously � approved the annexation,R-8 zoning,and acceptance of the fair share of the i City's debt at the Special Election held on September 16,2003. Mr.Erickson { stated that the subject site contains two single-family dwellings,and noted that i the essentially flat site hosts a seasonal stream along the eastern property line. . � j � .. ._. ,. �__..... ... ..._ . . ...� .. . .. ... _..... ..._..._. ... . .. .. ... .. ..___._ . _. ..._ Holly Graber- 1�1�-24-03.doc _. ..__�_... _.... ---- . ._ _ . .. . Page 3 ( � 1 e � '. November 24,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 3 � Pointing out that the site is within the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, ; and is served by Fire District#40,Mr.Erickson indicated that roadway and ' stormwater improvements are likely. He stated that Renton's Comprehensive � Plan designates this site as Residential Single Family,and R-8 zoning is ! � proposed to replace the existing King County R-1 zoning. Mr.Erickson reported that a fiscal analysis of the site,assuming a new home value of $300,000 and an increase to 40 single-family homes at full development, � determined an estimated surplus of$3,477 per year. He added that an estimated ; one-time expense in the amount of$23,442 is necessary for parks acquisition and improvements. In conclusion,Mr.Erickson stated that the proposed annexation furthers City business goals,is consistent with City policies for annexation,and appears to � serve the best interests and general welfare of the City. He recommended that ; Council adopt the ordinance that annexes the 6.43 acre Falk Annexation site, ; including the abutting portion of 102nd Ave.SE;designate the non-street ' portion R-8;and establish that the site be assessed and taxed at the same rate as i other properties within the City to pay all or any portion of the City's i outstanding indebtedness. � Responding to Council inquiries,Mr.Erickson clarified that the streets are not ; zoned,only private property is zoned. Regarding the fiscal analysis,he explained that the analysis is based upon an assumption of full development of the site,which can take years to achieve or may never happen. ; Councilman Clawson commented that the City's costs will increase year by year,and he noted the property tax limitation of one percent per year. Mayor Tanner added that the City requires developers to complete the basic i developmental infrastructure;therefore,the City does not incur that cost. i Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY PARKER, ! SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. � i CARRIED. (See page 435 for ordinance.) ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2003 and beyond. Items noted � included: ' � � The Piazza Renton organization presented a$200 donation to the Renton Yot Council in recognition of their excellent work and community involvement. i � The Transportation Improvement Board awarded$2,352,000 in transportatioi � grant money to the City of Renton for two projects in fiscal year 2005. The � Rainier Ave.Improvements Project received$2,202,000(local match of � $1,468,000),and the Benson Rd. S. Sidewalk Improvements Project ! received$150,000(local match of$331,900). AUDIENCE COMNYENT Linda Marweg,2201 Smithers Ave. S.,Renton,98055,encouraged Council to ;. Citizen Comment: Marweg- concur in the forthcoming Transportation Committee report, which Smithers Ave S Traffic recommends measures to address speeding traffic and pedestrian safety on i Concerns Smithers Ave.S. She indicated that the proposal is within the best interest of i the affected neighborhood. � i ; � � _._... ......_.._._.. .......... ... ..... .........�..._.. ....,.....__.. _._....__...___._. _.. .......�._.� ..... . .. .. .�- -- .. _.... _ ...... __..., .. - -- � � hoiiy ura�er-_i_1-z4-u:�.aoc Page 14 , —._► � � ---• � November 24,2(}03 Renton City Council Minutes Page I 4 Ordinance#5036 Following second and final reading of the above ordinance, it was MOVED BY � Rezone: Wiemeyer Property, BRIERE,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE N 5th St,CO to UC-N 1 (R-02- ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. 141) ; Reaone:�ry's Property, An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property ! Garden Ave 1V,COR 3 to UC- consisting of 21.3 acres locaeed at Garden Ave.N. and N, 8th St.from Center � N 1 (R-03-100) Office Residential3 (COR 3)to Urban Center-North 1 (UC-N 1)zoning,ancl declaring an emergency;R-03-100(Fry's). MOVED BY BRIERE, � SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCII.ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE � FOR SECOND AIVD FINAL READING, CARRIED. Ordinance#5037 Following second and final reading of the above ordinance, it was MOVED BY Rezone: Fry's Property, BRIERE,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE Garden Ave N,COR 3 to UC- ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES, CARRIED. N 1 (R-03-100) . I � Rezone:BNSF Railroad An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property Property,Lake WA Blvd N,IH consisting of 3.91 acres located at Lake Washington Blvd. N.from Heavy to UC-N 2(R-02-141) Industrial (IF�to Urban Center-North 2(UC-N 2)zoning,and declaring an � emergency;R-02-141 (Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad). MOVED BY BRTERE,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCII.ADVANCE THE � ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING. CAR.RIED. � Ordinance#5038 Following second and final reading of the above ordinance, it was MOVED BY Rezone:BNSF Railroad BRIERE,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COLINCII.ADOPT THE Property,Lake WA Blvd N,IH ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: A.LL AYES. CARRIED. to UC-N 2(R-02-141) , Rezone:Puget Sound Energy An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property Property,Lake WA Blvd N,IH consisting of 10.09 acres,which abut Lake Washington Blvd.N.,from Heavy i to UC-N 2(R-02-141) Industrial(IFi) to Urban Center-North 2(UC-N 2) zoning,and declaring an i emergency;R-02-141 (Puget Sound Energy). MOVED BY BRIERE, I SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCII.A.DVAI�TCE THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READIIVG. CARRIED. Ordinance#5039 Following second and final reading of the above ordinance, it was MOVED BY Rezone: Puget Sound Energy BRIERE,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCII.ADOPT THE ' Property,Lake WA Blvd N,IH ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. to UC-N 2(R-02-141) � The foilowing ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to[he __ _ _ Council meeting of 12/O1/2003 for second and final reading: � 'r An ordinance was read annexing contiguous unincorporated territory known as the Falk Annexation consisting of 6.43 acres bounded by S.47th St. to the : I — north,SE 185th Pl.to the south,and 102nd Ave. SE to the east,by the election method;and setting the taxation rate,establishing a zoning classification of R- 8,and fixing the effective date of the annexation. MOVED BY CORMAN, ' I SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR ; SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/O1/2003. CARRIED. � , i ' � . . . . ._ _.._ - .•--... . _.... ... _ _ ._. . . .......... . ...... --.,-r.,-r-,..--_ -^-_.---._...___... ._.. � Holly Graber- 11-03-03.doc _. . , � . — -- �' _..— ..� - � _ , i ; November 3,20�3 Renton Ciry Council Minutes Pagc 5 ' AUDIENCE COMMENT Ray Giometti,323 Pelly Ave.N.,Renton,98055,addressed the subject of the � Citizen Comment: Giometti- Boeing Renton site surplus property redevelopment. He stated that Boeing � Boeing Renton Site EIS wants the City to grant zoning that would allow big-box retail development on l both sides of Park Ave.N.;however,allowing this could impede future quality � development on the land between Park Ave.N.and Logan Ave.N. He � recommended that the City initially permit zoning for big-box development east of Park Ave. N.only,thus allowing better land use opportunities for property , on the west side of Park Ave. N. Mr.Giometti cautioned that this is a complex ' issue that will be discussed for years to come,and he encouraged Council not to i rush into making the decision to allow big-box retail on both sides of Park Ave. N.this early in the stages of development. ' � CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the i I listing. ;, Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of October 27,2003. Council concur, I October 27,2003 I. City Clerk; Special Election City Clerk submitted certified copy of the October 20,2003,King County Certifica[ion �ales a� Council meeting minutes and the September 16,2003,Special Election Tydico , on certification from King County Records and Elections stating the results of the I �a`�` special election for the Bales,Falk,and Tydico annexations. Bales ! � Annexation: Proposed Annexation to the City of Renton-4 votes for i annexation,0 votes against,PASSED;Assumption of Indebtedness-4 "yes" votes,0"no"votes,PASSED;Proposed Zoning Regulation-2 votes for AILED. Falk Annexation: Proposed Annexation � : adoption,2 votes agamst,F ; ' to the City of Renton-4 votes for annexation,0 votes against, PASSED; ; Assumption of Indebtedness-4 "yes" votes,0 "no" votes,PASSED;Proposed � Zoning Regulation-4 votes for adoption,0 votes against,PASSED. Tydico Annexation: Proposed Annexation to the City of Renton-2 votes for , annexation,0 votes against,PASSED;Assumption of Indebtedness-2 "yes" ' votes,0"no" votes,PASSED;Proposed Zoning Regulation-2 votes for i adoption,0 votes against,PASSED. Information. j. Budget:2004 Annual City of 'Finance and Information Services Department recommended a public he�.iring Renton be set on November 17,2003,to consider the 2004 City of Renton Preliminary Budget. Council concur. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNC]L APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Annexation: Bales, SE 128th MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY PARKER,COUNCIL : St REFER THE SUBJECT OF THE PROPOSED ZONING REGULATION FC)R � THE BALES ANNEXATION TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. � CARRIED. '� � OLD BUSINESS Council President Keo]ker-Wheeler presented a report recommending that a i �ommittee of the Whoie public hearing be set for November 17,2003,to consider the Fry's Electronics Comprehensive Plan:2003 Comprehensive Plan amendment and The Boeing Company Comprehensive 'i Amendments(Boeing&Frys) Plan amendments and development agreemen� MOVED BY KEOLKER- I WH�ELER,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. � I � ! � _....._._�___...__�� Ho�iy uraoer- i i-e u-u,s,,a�� „ . . . . . _—.__.—._.� ; November 10,2003 Renton City Council Minutes p��2 Continuing,Mr.Zimmerman stated that this power line reroute entails a tiour to � six hour power outage that will affect approximately 270 customers,including ; Hazen High School. PSE posted notices door-to-door on November 6 ; informing customers of the power outage that starts at 9:00 a.m.on November 11. He noted that due to the Veteran's Day holiday,Hazen High School will not be in session that day. ; Responding to Council President TCeolker-Wheeler's and Mayor Tanner's ! inquiries,Mr.Zimmerman assured that the City would check with PSE to confirm that concerns have been addressed regarding residents with special needs or medical equipment,and residents with older furnaces that have�ilot � lights needing relighting after the power outage. I CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the ' listing. ; Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of November 3,2003, Council concur. ; November 3,2003 CAG: 03-154,2003 City Clerk reported bid opening on 11/OS/2003 for CAG-03-154,2003 Downtown Sidewalk&Curb Downtown Sidewalk and Curb Ramp;eight bids;engineer's estimate , Ramp,R&J Landscape and $133,325.20;and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the Construction low bidder,R&J Landscape and Construction,Inc.,in the amount of : $116,070.25. Council concur. � Court Case; Curtis McDaniel, Court Case filed in King County Superior Court by Charles S.Hamilton,III, i CRT-03-007 600 Market Place One,2003 Western Ave.,Seattle,98121,representing i Curtis McDaniel,alleging negligence,false anest and false imprisonment, � and assault and battery in connection with his arrest by Renton police i officers on 5/09/2002. Refer to Citv Attorn�and Insurance Services. j Development Services:Reed Development Services Division recommended acceptance of dedication of ; Short Plat ROW Dedication, additional right-of-way for a 15-foot corner radius at the intersection oti ! Meadow Ave N&N 24th St Meadow Ave.N.and N.24th St. to fulfill a requirement of the Reed Short Plat(SHP-03-062). Council concur. Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Departmeiit recommended a public hearing be set on 11/24/2003 to consider the � prezoning of R-8 for the Falk Annexation; 6.43 acres bounded by S.47th � St. to the north,SE 185th Pl. to the south, and 102nd Ave. SE to the east. � Council concur. Comp Plan: 2004 Amendment Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Suategic Planning Department Pre-Application,2904 Maple submitted pra-applica[ion for 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendment for . Vailey Hwy 0.2 acres located at 2904 Maple Valley Hwy.to change land use . � designation from Residential Options(RO),zoned R-10, to Convenience ! , Commercial(CC) with a concurrent rezone to CC(Jones Rezone). Refer to � Planning and Development Committee. Budget:2004 Annual City of Finance and Information Services Department recommended a public hearin�� Renton be set on 11/24/2003 to consider the proposed 2Q04 City of Renton Final Budget. Council concur. ; Utility:Utility System PlanningBuilding/Public Works Deparcment raquested approval to update th� Development Charges Utility System Development Charges that new development is assessed to hobk-up to the City's water,wastewater,and surface water utilities. Refer i to Utilities Committee. � l � � � . ; � ��✓r—.,`V � �,�=�4 ' _ � i � ` I I I I i . ENVIROIVMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION i i . PROJECT NAME: FALK ANNEXATION R-8 REZONE • � � PROJECTNUMBER: LUA-02-019,qR,ECF � i DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: The applicant,Sleve Beck,has requested Environmenlel Review for . ; lhe proposed rezo�ing of this 5.96 acre ennexetion slle(excluding streets)from King Countys R-t Zone , lo Renton's R-B Zone. The current sile is the northem section of the praviously proposed originel Falk Mnexation of 13.86 ecres. Because annexatlons are SEPA exempt (RCW 4321C222) this i ' environmenlel review is onty for the rezone. Under Renlon's R-8 zoning the±8.43 acre site(Including , sVeet rlghtof-way)could�IheoreNcelly accommodete approxlmately 48 dwelling unita,assuming 8 du/net ' acre. Because of sleep slopes on e portion of ihe site the eclual num6er of unlis ellowed may be less � ' than 48 units. The proposed rezone Is consistent wifh Renton's Residentlal Single Family lend use I � � designetlon,as shown on the Cilys Comprehensive Plan Lend Use Map. Location:The 8.43 acre site is lacated lo the west of 102n0 Avenue SE fn Idng Counly and south of 5 47�"SVeet in Renton.The Clty of � Renton abuts Ne subJecl sile on its norih end west. ' . THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED � THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT AbVERSE IMPACT ON THE � ENVIRONMENT. -APPEALS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM FEBRUARY 3, 2003. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED $75.00 APPLICATION FEE WITH:HEARING EXAMINER,CITY OF RENTON,1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY,RENTON,WA 88055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 48- � 110E.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE,(425}430-6510. , � ❑ 0 p � �` a I. . � ° a I . � 4 Q p p8 I o p C ! . ❑ I � ❑ I Q SE 188th St I d � � N � ,�' �^�' � ❑ I�� I I � FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. I DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION � I . Please loclude the proJect NUMBER when cailfng for proper flle Identiflcation. i . i I -!?�..�j CERTIFICATION �`'. '` :��g'�'��,i�j(�'�`��eN�F/F� ; ti��37��'ib Q I' ��bIV �.I `a n�;�;"�,��1I�+5H1�lGTON ,� G� d:.��a�+l�i�.�°a��t��9�XPIRE� �, .�j .E�..4��;: ��,r�03 �:i :� I, .l��V ��1 '�'�ON ,hereby certify that ��"",`�'�'�b� o e above document were posted b me in_�conspicuo s places on or ne y the described property on 2Gt7� ��G�M� ��`��-�'� Signed: ATTEST:Subs ribed a sworn before me,a Notar Public,in an e State o v. Washington residing i ,on the � 3 day of ��'� ,��'� MARILYN Kd1AlICHEF�F ` ' �AY APP061�TMEt�TT EXPIRES:6-29�03 / ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION � POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: FALK ANNEXATION R-8 REZONE PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-02-019,A,R,ECF .. DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: The applicant, Steve Beck, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 5.96 acre annexation site(excluding streets)from King County's R-1 Zone . to Renton's R-8 Zone. The current site is the northern section of the previously proposed original Falk Annexation of 13.66 acres. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's R-8 zoning the +6.43 acre site (including street right-of-way)could theoretically accommodate approximately 46 dwelling units, assuming S du/net � acre. Because of steep slopes on a portion of the site the actual number of units allowed may be less . than 46 units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use . designation,as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Location:The 6.43 acre site is located to the west of 102nd Avenue SE in King County and south of S 47�'Street in Renton. The Ciry of Renton abuts the subject site on its north and west. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITfEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. APPEALS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM FEBRUARY 3, 2003. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED $75.00 APPLICATION FEE WITH: HEARING EXAMINER, CITY OF RENTON, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WA 98055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-8- 110E. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON - CITY CLERK'S OFFICE,(425)-430-6510. � , � p d - o : � � P � � .. . o . a � 4 Q a QS . � � o � N o �. 6 � � Q SE 188th St � � S d � � . ❑ N � �° �„�I d �, , r-, -- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION , �. Please include�ttie project NUMBER,vuhen calling;for.:proper.file;id'entifcation. I - � /�FFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Barbara Alther,first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the King County Journal -��u��l`iLDETERMINATIONENTAli�-� 600 S.Washington Avenue,Kent,Washington 98032 '�ENVIRONMENTAI�REVIEW , '� COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON a daily newspaper published seven(7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of � The Environmental Review - general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of 'Committee has issued a ' ublication, referred to, rinted and ublished in the En lish lan ua e continuall as a dail �Determination of Non�ignificance - P P P 9 9 9 Y Y �for the following projecd under the newspaper in Kent, King County,Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a � authority of the Renton,Municipal, _ Code. " legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. , F�,K ANNEXATION R-8�,� �f � The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the King County Journal(and not � � . REZONE in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below stated � ��j� ;��,�e,��,;- � � period. The annexed notice,a ' The applicant has requested .� '� Environmental (SEPA) Review Falk Annexation for the proposed rezoming of this � 5.96 acre annexation site from � King County's R-1 Zone to � as published on: 1/20/03 � Renton's R-8 Zone. Location: �, w�st of 102nd Ave. SE in King � The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$73.50, charged to � County and south of S.47th,St. °? ACCt. No. 8051067. Appeals of the environmental�, � determinatiion must be filed in�'� writing on or• beforea1s:�0 gPb � The cost above includes a$6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. February 3, 2003. Appe filed in writing together with the� Legal Number 845164 � '. required$75.00 application fee with:� ,Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,:�_ = 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA; i 98055.Appeals to the F�aminer are i Legal Clerk, ng County Journal ' go�erned by city of Renton ; Municipal Code Section 4-8-110E.'7 - � :Additional information regarding the� Subscribed and sworn before me on this�da o��, , � appeal process may be obtained from� / y � 2003 ; the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-�� 430-6510. ��aqEaeoad�p � Published in the King County� o0.�a>°�,,��`as�fd•f'��g%°Oo, Notary Public of the State of ashingt ,Journal Januax3�20,_2003.#845164 � � g s ��mx, .��`S �"Af,��y�'�,, residing in Renton o.,�a':��i `�m:�a King County,Washington _ t1�T�.9y :s�o _ �� '..,�y '0(/3 Llr+ � a P tN� `� '4�•��o o .�'•,� O. o O��dOp�4g'�:�-+�.„:.�S,��4o i a a4 9o�j��UdU6��d6U�J�� ; � - .'�."' ;=L(`��,�.::�Z�' January 27,2003 � � Renton City Council Minutes • � Page 32 Court in March,2002. The City purchased 1.125 acres of the annexation site as a future location for a surface water detention pond for the purpose of relieving � existing surface water problems in the area. Stating that the proposed annexation area contains one single-family home,Mr. Erickson noted that there is no new private development proposed at this time. Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Residential Single Family, and R-8 zoning is proposed to replace the existing King County R=6 zoning. In regaxds to public services,he indicated that the subject area is within Water District 90,within the Renton sewer service area,and that fire protection is provided by Fire District 25;however,there is a shortfall of parks. Mr.Erickson detailed the fiscal impacts of the proposed annexation assuming an increase to eight single-family homes at full development, and a new home value of$250,000. The City will realize a deficit of$392 at current �I, � 0� � �� development,and a deficit of$107 at full development. Reporting an estimated �� one-time expense of$2,932 for the acquisition and development of parks,Mr. Erickson pointed out that a revenue deficit at current and full development is typical for residential annexations. � In conclusion,Mr.Erickson stated that the proposed annexation is consistent with City policies for annexation,will further City business goals,and will result in no significant cost or service issues for the City. He recommended that Council adopt a resolution authorizing an annexation election,for which the City will bear the election costs,and authorize the Administration to draft a prezone ordinance for R-8 zoning for the subject site. Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARIl�tG. CARRIED. � MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND ARR.ANGING FOR AN ANNEXATION ELECTION TO CONSIDER ANNEXING THE VLTONG STTE AND ADJACENT STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE CITY; REQUIRE PROPERTY OWNERS WTTHIN THE ANNEXATION AREA TO ASSUME THEIR FAIR SHARE OF THE CITY'S OUTSTANDING BONDED INDEBTEDNESS;AND SUPPORT R-8 ZONING FOR THE ANNEXATION BECAUSE TT IS CONSISTENT WTTH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION,RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY,FOR THIS AREA. CARR�D. (See page 41 for resolution.) Annexation: Falk, S 47th St& This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in 102nd Ave SE accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Tanner opened the public hearing to consider the resolution authorizing an annexation election and consideration of R-8 (Residential Single Family; eight dwelling units per net acre)prezoning for the Falk Annexation; 6.43 acres bounded by S.47th St.to�the north, SE L��-(�2' �� 185th Pl.to the south, and 102nd Ave. SE to the east. Don Erickson, Senior Planner,pointed out that the subject annexation was part of a larger annexation(13.66 acres)by the same name initiated on March 4, 2002. Since the State Supreme Court invalidated the petition method of annexation on March 14,2002,adoption of a resolution authorizing an annexation election is recommended. The applicant, Stephen Beck,has agreed to reimburse the City for the cost of the election. Mr. Erickson described the i y January 27,2003 ' ' Renton City Council Minutes � Page 33 existing conditions of the site,noting the existence of four single-family dwellings, and a seasonal stream along the eastern property line.g Continuing,Mr. Erickson reported that the site is served by Fire District 40, is within the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, and roadway and stormwater improvements are likely. Stating that current King County zoning is R-1 with a Greenbelt/Urban Separator King County Comprehensive Plan designation,he explained that City staff successfully negotiated the removal of this area from the urban separator designation, and as a result the City can redesignate this site to a more intensive zoning. Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential Single Family, for which the proposed R-8 zoning is consistent with zoning to the west of the site and compatible with King County zoning to the east. Mr. Erickson reviewed the fiscal impacts of the proposed annexation, assuming an increase to 40 single-family homes at full development, and a new home value of$275,000. At current development the City will realize a deficit of $347, and at full development,the City will realize a surplus of$6,556. The one-time parks and development expense is estimated at$21,000. He reported that the proposed annexation meets the objectives of the King County Boundary Review Board and is generally consistent with City policies for annexations. In conclusion,he recommended that Council: adopt a resolution authorizing an annexation election for this site; authorize the Administration to draft a prezone ordinance for R-8 zoning; and authorize the submittal of the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board. Audience comment was invited. Reid McNair, 18525 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, stated that he favored the annexation; however,his property is no longer within the annexation area now that the area has been reduced from 13.66 to 6.43 acres. Emphasizing that he and many of his neighbors want to be annexed to the City of Renton,Mr. McNair asked Council to consider the original annexation. In response to Council President Keolker-Wheeler's inquiries,Mr.Erickson explained that Mr. Beck initiated the revised Falk Annexation, and he guessed that the boundaries were reduced because Mr.Beck felt confident that the two registered voters living on the site would support the annexation. In the election process, a super majority, or 60% of the citizens residing on the site must assume the City's bonded indebtedness. He confirmed that the Council is not bound to accept the annexation as presented. Mayor Tanner urged Council not to take any action tonight other than on the proposal as presented. He stated that citizens who are not included in this annexation, and who are still interested in annexing to the City, can apply for annexation at a later time. Council discussion ensued regarding whether action should be delayed until the possibility of expanding annexation boundaries is explored. It was pointed out that Mr. Beck might not be willing to pay the election costs if the boundaries are expanded. Upon Mr. McNair's assertion that he was willing to absorb election costs,Mr. Erickson pointed out that action could be delayed a week for further exploration of the matter. A ` y January 27,2003 T Renton City Council Minutes • Page 34 Joe MacKenzie, 18533 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, and Louis Longo, 18509 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, expressed their desire to remain in King � County. Curtis Schuster, 12320 NE 8th St., Suite 100,Bellevue, 98005,representing KBS Development Corporation, stated that he is in the same situation as Mr. McNair, and wants the City to consider the original annexation. Fred Gustafson, 18439 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, stated that he resides in the proposed annexation area and is in favor of the annexation. He expressed his desire to be represented by the City of Renton,rather than by King County. Judy Richardson, 18816 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, stated that although she is not directly impacted by the proposed annexation, she wanted to point out that the site is on a dead end and there is no other way in and out of the property except by 102nd Ave. SE or SE 186th St. Both of those streets are in King County;therefore,Renton's fire and police personnel must go through King County to get to the site. Ms.Richardson also pointed out that there is a seasonal stream on the east side of the site,and expressed concern about future development of that stream site. Stephen A.Beck, 19129 SE 145th St.,Renton, 98055, applicant for the Falk Annexation, expressed his fear that a larger annexation would not be successful; and for that reason,he chose to go forward with the annexation as proposed. Councilman Clawson noted that it may take some time to educate the neighboring residents about the annexation process, and recommended that Council take action on the annexation as proposed. There being no further public comment,it was MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN ANNEXATION ELECTION TO CONSIDER THE FALK AND GUSTAFSON PROPERTIES AND ABUTTING 102ND AVE. SE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE CITY; CONDITION THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE ANNEXATION ON PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THE ANNEXATION AREA ASSUMING THEIR FAIR SHARE OF THE CIT'Y'S OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS; REQUIRE THE APPLICANT TO REIMBURSE THE CITY FOR COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH HOLDING THE ELECTION; SUPPORT R-8 PREZONING FOR THE SITE; AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO SUBMIT THE NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. (See page 41 for resolution.) Council President Keolker-Wheeler encouraged those citizens interested in annexing to the City of Renton to contact City staff. Planning:Downtown Core This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Off-Street Parking accordance with local and State laws,lVlayor Tanner opened the public hearing Requirements to consider the proposed amendments to the Downtown Core off-street parking requirements. �.,,L�Q�- p�s Don Erickson, Senior Planner, explained that the 83-acre Downtown Core area � is currently exempt from all parking requirements and parking,when imposed, �� , - � - , January 27,2003 Renton City Council Minutes � Page 41 Core area, and recommended that Council support the following amendments to the parking requirements for the Downtown Core: � 1. Allow exemptions to transfer to new uses and changes of uses occupying e�sting square footage. 2. Establish a new minimum standard for new residential uses of one space per unit within the Core. 3. Increase the standard for low-income elderly housing to 1.0 space per each three units(0.33 spaces/unit). 4. Establish a new standard for new commercial uses of 1.0 space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for most commercial uses. 5. Establish a new standard of 1.0 space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for restaurants and 5.0 spaces for stacking for each station. 6. Adopt existing Citywide standards for most recreational and entertainment uses with the follow exceptions: a. A new standard of 15 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for dance halls, dance clubs, and skating rinks. 7. Adopt a new standard for religious institutions of 1.0 space for each five seats in the main auditorium,provided that spaces for any church shall not be less than ten spaces. For all existing religious institutions enlarging the seating capacity of their auditoriums, 1.0 additional parldng space shall be provided for each five additional seats provided by the new construction, or ten spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area without fixed seats. For all churches making structural alterations or additions,which do not increase the seating capacity of the auditorium, see"outdoor and indoor sports arena, auditoriums, stadiums,places of public assembly,movie theaters,and entertainment clubs." 8. Allow parking to be provided off-site within the Downtown Core without distance limitations. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: � RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3614 A resolution was read calling for the annexation,by election, of contiguous Annexation: Vuong,Anacortes unincorporated territory to the City of Renton lying in an area generally Ave NE&NE l Oth St bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary to the west; approximately the northern edge of NE l Oth Pl., if extended,to the north; the southern edge of (�l�l(9 ' (��' �7��4 NE l Oth St.to the south; and the western edge of 137th Ave.NE,if extended, to the east(Vuong Annexation). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WIIEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. '�"I `�' Resolution#3615 A resolution was read calling for the annexation,by election, of contiguous ; Annexation: Falk, S 47th St& unincorporated territory to the City of Renton lying in an area generally ; 102nd Ave SE bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary,including S. 47th St.,to the north; SE 185th Pl.,if extended,to the south; 102nd Ave. SE,to the east; ��' n2'��j -;_�..,:�. i' - i � - i- � ...,I: . ��Y � . U �; � ♦ � � � . ��N�p'� FALK ANNEXATION PUBLIC HEARING RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ANNEXATION ELECTION & CONSIDERATION OF R-8 PREZONING JANUARY 27TH,2003 The City is in receipt of a request from two property owners in the 18000 block of 102"a Avenue SE, seeking authorization for an Annexation Election on the 6.43-acre annexation site abutting Renton's southeastern boundary. The subject site is within the City's Potential Annexation Area and is designated Residential Single Family on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. It is the City's intent to prezone the parcels to R-8, 8 units per net acre. City zoning would be applied at the time the site comes into the City. The site is currently zoned R-1 in King County with a Greenbelt/Urban Separator comprehensive plan designation. The City has been in discussions with King County staff about removing the urban separator designation along the west side of 102°a Avenue SE. The Growth Management Planning Council agreed to removing this area from the urban separator designation. Based upon this agreement, King County staff will support annexation and redesignation of this site to a more intensive zoning. Renton's R-8 zoning would allow 41 units on the 6.43-acre annexation site versus 39 units under the County's R-6 zoning. The annexation site appears to have reasonable boundaries. The annexation site abuts the City on its northern and western boundaries. South 47th Sireet in the City abuts the site on the north and 102°a Avenue SE in the County on the east. The annexation area includes the portion of 102°a Avenue SE abutting it on the east. The site slopes gently to the northeast and is relatively flat. No wetlands or other critical areas are lrnown to exist on the annexation site. The site contains two parcels and three or four detached single-family dwellings. There are no parks in the immediate vicinity. No service issues have been identified other than parks. Sewer and water would be provided by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. A resolution authorizing the holding of an annexation election for the subject site is before the City Council this evening. The Council will also hold the first of two hearings on the proposed R-8 zoning for this site. . Council Hearing Handout O1-27-03\ � - � � NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. FALK ANNEXATION R-8 REZONE LUA-02-019,A,R,ECF The applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review for the proposed rezoning of this 5.96 acre annexation site from King County's R-1 Zone to Renton's R-8 Zone. Location:west of 102"d Ave. SE in King County and south of S. 47th St. Appeals of the environmental dc;termination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 3, 2003. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110E. Additional information regarding the � appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: January 20,2003 Account No. 51067 dnspub r��t�� -��t-�`l�t� � � �_ o L��.i.�i-� • - �y § :.�� . �' - t:�'.:.�,:^7 �,_. vY . ��'�_�=a CITh' OF IZENTON .. _. :__ �, ,._��.I �.� " �� c t� .� NOTIC� OF PUBLIC HEARING � ��,�',.1 � � ;��'�;;:.r NOTICE IS Ii�IEtEBY GI�N that the Renton City Couricil has fixed the 27th day of 7anuary, 2003, at 7:30 p.m. as the date and time for a public hearing to be held in the seventh floor Council Chambers of Renton City Hall, 1055 S. Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,to consider the following: , Proposed annexation and prezone for approximately 6.43 acres located at the corner of S. 47`�' Street(if extended) and 102nd Avenue SE in King County. (Falk Annexation) All interested parties are invited to attend the hearing and present written or oral cornments regarding the proposal. Renton City Hall is in compliance with the American Disabilities Act, and intexpretive services for the hearing impaired will be provided upon prior notice. For information, call 425-430-6510. . �� a� . Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk . Published South County Journal January 17, 2003 Account No. 50640 ��-� n1 ♦ - �■�■ �I��u��r � � '— .�– �i►- t.� _ . . 7�� .�..�. . � ��i I ■ �Il ��111111 � � � ' �unun� �■ � -.�� ■ �� - t��un '�►�� ntunuu =1►= �� L111�11" • � . �111 ��II��III : ::= �.` � ■a . �i � , � -� �� , � � �■� ■ ■ ■ � � �� 'll .. �� .� ��/n�� ■ -� � � - •1 ��,� � ; ;;��;`! i! :��ii 5 e. I _ �. �� -i.mllllt�— � �� 1 �- �. ■ � � . �� ii i 'i , .%�\ r1 1�� ii i � �� - � I�II� :: : ,,/ ��I� - � 1�1�/� � ■ ,■ � � -�� ` � e� � � � � � �!.. \' �� 1� ��I�■. � .� - . _ � �, 'ii � � 1 � '�� ■ ��i='�� . .. _- _�� , ��rl • � �� C : ;':e i�� ; � � ■�—�� ► �� ► �� -.■ ' �� :ii � � i�'_CI� �� 1 �1 � �� ■�':�� i —11�' . ■ —�� i � ■ji:�� i - � � ♦��\ � �=� � � ��_�i �� ', ��i� i ■�� O ��1� ; ..__, . _� r . _...... : :,.,...,....: .I 1� �.... .... • :,•.�.�..� ��1��.� �' = � ►��■�■ :►.�• .. ■■i �� ►�� I�I� ■ �� ,�� ' � �� ■t11. - � — ��■ ■��■ /I�� 111 �� t��o �1�� :� . ��t��l�/: �� , �.� �� .` �r�� ■► .� �r . � ��.��r ��■ �►� � ■■�..�. �.�►.��1.�►.��■ �7�� = �� -.•��. -� .I� J:i . .,..,�:� _ --_ „ f••:: �� ,�I111111P� �\II�� ■ �r:�\\�I -, ■ � �.��\��--■ ■ 11111111111111. �� u��.v.+..� �,�■ ■�: �� ■ �� i � • • �� u�� , � L7��i��'�i �.�� C�►�I� a n��1�� 1��1�1 r�;�\►�•• • ��I��►�� -`� : � .7: �� : : � . � au ��` .•►� : `wn �� ,_,� ��/l1U�1►� r: �:i��i : � ��= ■■ �►�� u� ��J� nnmll\�� ; �.:� � � �.� � i.��D��u4�� : ��r - � ■�� ►�. �� L��1 ��r�1■� ��I � ��1� �� ' ��1�,� ..�� i�: �C :?�i��i '- tl�� ID::: '��'� i �. .. �. . . •.• ��.- I • 1�11�: ��i�,�� .- ��' I�i►��: ,� ��i-� ��•`��E�ii��-�i� �'�'ll ,■'i` %ii';5• � ��.�� ■ I r � � t j�::��;� 1_ =: ',-' �II:11' ' � ' I , �,�i,1�;:= .-� . ��- == .� � � ►.�,:�:::r--s�.�� == :. 1. � ■ _ ' � � �u■��Jiu tji � ■■■■�� 7 ' � r� .� � `� 1�i: CC� C � �.��._ ::_ . � � ��: �.�:■ ..�� . _ �, , =IIL': �'; 1 �■- . �. �= =■ � �� •■. �. �� :. _- �� . ►��. �� 1 ��/�; � �: C: � � ■ ��1■i �� ■ � f�� ,�,��%� � i� �i ��II■ �� ■ � �i..�.,��.��.:,5, ��/1 � =c E: �••� - • ��. .. -�... 7111� ■ ■.i� � a■ . ,� • ..� � . . � ��!�IIII`l;il♦ .�r�•::� ;��i!_�: e��i: �:II�L , '� � ` ' ' �:�1.�1�'C' =`�=�==: ::' rir:: �, � :i�`�iD C. .. �� -_ � ��:,�: �■��/ 1�/�■: �i ii ��i�iCC -�_ �F �II�Ir ' �111 �1 �II C Ci :: �.C� �� .��_��. ■ .--�� . – – �, . 1 11 ' 1 � I' 1 � x•s:�.:.,...:..�::�;�:,�:,�::�v+x�::�:•: :x�x � �:st>:•••..t:.+:,+z • . • � � " — • .,.,� � .. � •�.. �... , J . • •. :. .. �Q ;. �� • .•. -• . :. •. p09L5 aase� . � `";?�e� ssaaPPt/ oAZ13Atl �� . - � � � I 322305916304 322305912A02 � � 322305910000 STECKLER MARTIN R&IRENE M LO ANDREW H K MCINTOSH ROBERT D+KATHRYN L 10012 SE 187TH ST 10035 SE 187TH ST 10104 SE 187TH ST� . RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 � � 947600001004 � 947600020004 . � 264140001001 SHEPPARD JOHN�B STUZ TGEN GLF.NN J ' BUI T'fN MAI+TAN DIIQH 10205 SE 185TH PL ' 10208 SE 185TH PL � 10210 SE 186TH ST � RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA � 98055 � 98055 98055 947600002002 . 947600019006 264140002009 . REYES ALVIN A+LISA M ' NGUYEN RENE+TERFSA+MICHAEL CHEA NORIN+PHANNY � 10211 SE 185TH PL ' 10214 SE 185TH PL 10216 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA � RENTON WA � RENTON WA 98055 . ; 98055 � 98055 � . .. . � . .. . : 947600003000 � 947600018008 9.47600004008 VANNGUYEN JOHN+LIEU - MCCABE JOHN H+NANCY D � MARR]EFFRREY F+OFELIA 10217 SE 185TH PL � 10220 SE 185TH PL 10223 SE 185'TH PL RENTON WA � � RENTON WA � RENTON WA 98055 ; 98055 . 98055 947600017000 264140004005 947600005005 itEEVES MARK T+FRANCINE P � LOiJIE KENNY S , SHIEH WUNJANG K+SIOUMING L. 10226 SE 185TH PL � � 10228 SE 186TH ST � ' 10229 SE 185TH PL � � � RENTON WA � ' RENTON WA ' RENTON WA 98055 � 98055 ' 98055 264140005002 264140046006 264140045008 DAVIS LARRY J ' DIMALANTA FRED J+CHRISTINE METPS DEBRA L 10234 SE 186TH ST � 10335 SE 187TH PL � . � 10339 SE 187TH PL RENTON R'A RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 . 98055 � 98055 ; 322305909705 322305928606 � � 322305929802 AVZARADEL SOL GIBLER PAUL 7+LOIS L ; CALAGN GEORGETA . 15722 SE 160TH PL ; 18404102ND AVE SE � ; 18414 102ND AVE SE . . RENTON WA � ; RENTON WA . � ' RENTON WA . � . 98058 . 98055 : 98055 322305909606 . . � 322305916205 :°` � : 322305917005 � GUSTAFSON FRED E+DEBRA O . �' MCNAIR REID H+MEGAN r ; LONGO L � � 18439 102ND AVE SE . �. �� 18463 102ND AVE SE �,: 18509 102ND SE ' RENTON WA � � RENTON RlA .: RENTON WA . � 98055 ' � 98055 : 98055 � . � � .- - - ;, , 322305917609 . ` � , 322305917104 322305921403 " j KELLY CYNTHIA L : . MACKENZIE JOSEPH . ` ENDZELL PAUL � : 18517 102ND AVE SE� ; 18533 102ND AVE SE ` 18615 102ND AVE SE i RENTON WA � . ; RENTON WA .RENTON WA . � 98055 � 98055. : 98055 322305908509 322305926709 264140003007 � GREENE HOMER I�EII,EEN M TRU . MALPHRUS THOMAS LE CINDY GO RUTH W E 18616 102ND AVE SE 18713 102ND AVE SE 19222108TH AVE SE RENTON WA : RENTON WA ; RENTON WA , . 98055 , 98055 98055 p09i5 ao�a�e�dwa�as� , . ! W,,s�aay§ paa� yaoowS ---- o09i5 �ase� � ��aqe� ssaaPPd oA2l3At� Q� � � . . � � - � . � �� i �.. 322305932509 . 855920018006 855920004006 � MCCLELLAN H DONALD+MARY H SPECIALIZED HOMES CLAEYS JIM+SUSAN . 2509 S 354TH AVE 3001 E YESLER WAY 4708 SMITHIIZS AV S FEDERAL WAY WA SEATTLE WA , RENTON WA 98002 98122 98055 947600021002 � 312305908708 � 312305910001 I�NG COUNTY � SCHNEIDER HOMES I LLC BILSKI B LEE+ROXANNE H ' 500 K C ADMIN BLDG � 6510 SOUTHCENTER BLVD STE 1 . 700 SOUTH SOTH ST SEATTLE WA ' TUKWILA WA � RENTON WA 98104 � 98188 . 98055 . �`. . . . . ! 312305915000 � 312305910407 . � 312305904905 . � � FINK.LAWI2ENCE E+SALLY J . COOKS HENRY E BUTTON A I � 709 S SOTH �: 712 S 50.TH ST 715 S 50TH � ' RENTON WA . : RENTON WA � RENTON WA ! . ' 98055 : 98055 98055 . �. ... . ...... . , . . . . � . 855920015002 . . . . 855920016000 . 322305902205 � . MACDONALD DOUGLAS M � MANGLA SANDEEP+PREETI SINGLA � FALK NII�IA E 718 S 47TH ST : 724 S 47TH ST � PO BOX 112 . RENTON WA ; RENTON WA �BLACK DIAMOND WA 98055 ; 98055 - .; 98010 : . ' � Steven A. Beck 22305-9097� 312305909300 . • 4735 NE 4th Street � . ; �uddell., Rebeno MOOREPAUt,M �: Renton, WA 98059 � 3717 Beach Arive SW, ��109 � PO BOX 5985 � � ` Seattle, WA 99116 KENT WA . ' 98064 .. ; . . - , . . � . : 822305-9097 � Janet Abubakar : � 322305-9097 .. � TAYLOR, LOLIN AND HACKI � 18415 10.2nd Ave, SE � Ruddell, Susan L. 1353b 476tti Av.enee SE . . � Renton WA 98055 �. : North Bend, WA 980�+5 , ' ` 88 Virgia, Suite ��2�3 � :. � �, t._ Seattle, WA 98101 � � _ . . � . . , �1 � .. � .. --� � . � �. . � � . . �. . . . , . � . . . . .. : ; � � . . � ; i � � . ; : . ; , I : : . , � . � � . p09i5 ao�a�e�dwa�as� � � � Wis�aayS paa� y;oows . - �_�aoa�-ol � r v _ CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3 615 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT3t OF RENTON, WASI3INGTON, CALLING FOR THE A1�NEXA'TION, BY ELEC'TION, OF COI�TIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED TERY2I'TORY TO THE CITY OF REI�TTON LYING IN AN A1�EA GENEIZALLY BOUNDED BY THE CIT�' OF RENTON COI�PORATE BOUNDARY, INCLUDING S. 47TH STREET, TO THE NORTH; �E 185Tg PLAC�, IF EXTENDEIl, TO THE SOUT�I; 102� AYEl`TiTE SE, TO THE EAST; AND THE E�ISTING CITY �OUNDAR�', TO T�IE WES'T. (FALK A1vNEXATION) WHERE?.S, the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, has determined that it would be in the best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton to annex the property generally bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary, including S. 47"' Street, to the north; SE 185�' Place, if extended, to the south; 102nd Avenue SE, to the east; and the existing City boundary; to the west; legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth; and WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous to call for an election for this annexation; NOW, TI�EREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS EOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would ' be served by the annexation of contiguous unincorporated territory lying generally in the area bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary, including S. 47`h Street, to the north; SE 185"' Place, if extended, to the south; 102°d Avenue SE, to the east; and the existing City _��` ' . ' � 4 ' RESOLUTION NO. 3615 -� boundary, to the west; legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth. SECTION III. As nearly as can be determined the number of voters residing in the aforesaid territory is two. SECTION IV. The City Council hereby calls for an election to be held pursuant to Chapter 35A.14 RCW to subxnit to the voters of the aforesaid territory the proposal for anne�tion. SECTION V. There sha11 also be submitted to the electorate of the territory sought to be annexed a proposition that all properly located within the territory to be annexed shall, upon annexa.tion, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the sa.me basis as property � located within the City of Renton is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton, which indebtedness has been approved by the voters, contracted for, or incurred prior to or existing at,the date of annexation. SECTION VI. There shall also be submitted to the electorate of the territory sought to be annexed a proposition that all property located within the territory to be annexed <�_ shall, simultaneous with the annexation, have imposed the City of Renton zoning regulations, . prepared.under RCW 35.A.14.340, with.a Comprehensive Plan designation of Residentia.l Single Family(RS) and a zoning designation of R-8 (Residential single family, 8 dwelling units per acre). SECTION VII. The cost of said annexation election shall be paid by the City of Renton. SECTION VIII. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Resolution with the King County Council and with the King County Boundary Review Board. 2 � � 3615 xESOLUTION NO. - SECTION IX. The City Clerk shall also file with the King County Boundary Review Board a Notice of Intention hereof as required by RCW 36.93.090 et seq. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 2�th day of January , 200.:... ��/• Cc�Lz�'�- Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2�t h day of J anu a ry , 20G�.. � . � Je Tanner,Mayor Approv to form: �' Q�y�iV Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.953:1/23/03:ma 3 � ,.-.� . RESOLUTION LSfiO.�.:3��-5 � 1 " a. . � � EXHIBIT A 1 � FALK ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter.of the Southwest quarter of Section 32,Township23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,King County, Washington, lying northerly of the south line of the north 72 feet of the south half(1/2)of said subdivision; - EXCEPT the east 20 feet thereof; TOGETHER WITH those portions of the west 30 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter and the east 20 feet of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, all in Section 32, Township 23 North, Range.5 East,W.M.,King County, Washington, lying northerly of a line described as follows: Beginning said line at a point on the west boundary line�of the plat of Windsor Heights, as recorded in Volume 173 of Plats,Page 28 through 30, inclusive, records of King County, Washington, said point being 102.80 feet southerly of the northwest corner of said plat and also being a point on the easterly right of�way margin of 102nd Ave SE; Thence westerly along said line, said line being perpendicular to said plat boundary line and right of way mazgin, crossin� 102 Ave SE,to an intersection with the westerly right of way margin of 102° Ave SE and the termination of said line. � � �� ,t�=�qq�� V � ■ ■ :: �� ■ �I�iiii��i�i � �� . �� C/'_IIIIIII � • � ' 7�� ■ - t111111 �1►�,,'lllllllllll C'� '�� -�� . 111 ��1111111_: ::�� '�� i ��11■� � �� ■ , . .. � .� � ■.■ , �� ■ �� :11_ �� == ,��i■.� : i ■ ■ �a��11111,. • �, � � �' I � ��-, �► 1� �1�� . ■■ � �.w1111�;� 1 i� i: : �i"'_ � j � . 1�1�� :i i `� , �� I/�� ii i �� - r 1�1�� .. . r 1,/ ,■ �i i � ■: : �i� � � �� . .� �� II� � ■ � :,� " ■ ,��I... � � ■ :1-: : :��=I�� . .=- -- � _ _�� ♦ �■�r� . � �: � � ■:::��:� � � � �C� � � '.._=�` •— ' � � �� :�� :■'?%,� � -. ' ,i��i i' . � �� : :i::�:�� ' ♦ � - � � �,�M��.. � �� n.�� '+ ��i� � !� ��U ��1� ; .-_�1 � ��.�� • �� '��II��■�1 ��■� �� ■ i,-�1��I � 1��I' 1/ � � ��■■� :►�►�ii :: .■� � � '� ■ ��■■�� 1� -� ,= = �■■�■�■� �� `�C � ��■��■ ��■ �� I � �_ � ■ �� I . ��I►/: ��:� , �� ` �� .*��r��.■ ■► -: �s . D ��i ��■ .1�� -� .■�pn. I��I 111-1��►_�� -� I�J�.� ..,_.._„� � ,. ��,� I_�11 -_- ��,�••� ` �� t��►�� _��■�■ �-1111111: ��i iiii � � :.. ��tl\�� ■ �� 11 � au�n��i+: �p■ ■.. �� ■ �� i1♦ �►� �� ;��:�.�;:��i�1�1� � L..7 ,11�.�f � �I�� ! �� t�!��G � �11�■►�� p �`� � �■ � .-�.■�� .. � . —�'r L ��m U►L —� �►� � wm �--=-��/IIU I�C� � �:i�� : � �� :`�:i r : ��i �� i.i�� nnunll� �■. v, � �� n� � � � : �ji/ � 7 ■ ■■ �.�. :��.��.� L�� _; -1�� i�i�:� .: :��,�; � �� r�� i�: �; ;:►��`�� _-_.•1_� I- �t�..� ;�II:=.: �� i �••:• •�'� �� ' ��`: :..��.�► -�� 1111 ' '�`'��= ♦ � �� I�r►♦ • . �_ 1 1� : �■ :�ry..i:�7� ■ �.... �.� � � -��C��II'�:F��i��1� �� ■�� :�I��1�� • ��i►��J� �� '�� i�� _ '■� �"� . �� I � ''��:= r �L��ii i�,-�� -� �� :� 1. ' I r •...�LJ,u tl�� .....,; 7—_ � � � � `�` �\�. � 'r i � -- - `.�.._ _� ■ � �i� � �� ■ ■=� �■■_ ��_i .IIL� � � I�I��■�'�� I�`,'-' � �� p• � � '! ��. �1i' ��/: : �� : ■� � ■ �J�r: �� '' .�: � .� �• � � ■ � ��I��1�i i� ` : :: C: ■�� C�_ ■ � i . �� .. ■■■■■. � .i..;.��,....,.:,:, �,,,,�a► : ;,: � _.:- �� : �iII � . _■ � ' �■��•: ��•� = - - . , �� `�„i� „r;-::::�i!_�- :��; ■II�L , �'�� `•'� =='':== "�- 'r�:: �-_ �� = = �.'�ti�� :: � ��■�■;:,�: ��■i ��II■-�' .. ,�►t�CC � ��_ � ■E �Il��r ' �1�1 �1 �rI ��: :: :� .�� --�� --I� i - -� �� •- -�� ; � . , ;• I � � � � � �. � �. ��::::::�::::.::::::::::::.::::::::::::>:; �, . . . . . 11 — • . , � � � �.��-� •,.. ,..� � �_ J • . •• :. •. , •� . ;: . '„ • ••. -. � . :. •. i � � � a 0 S 47th Str �� - _ - � :�� :��' � - :��`::<�.~� , �::�;;;: ;,;._. '_�� - ,�:�:`;'��;:`.''.�:.:: . - 'i;; - d � - - = a _;,,:� - :':f;`;�;y:?<:_ - - _ _ - ❑ ��'=, - = - `�,y - _ - - - _ - `'r�'�:.; f y �:j� n Jrtii.':.' _ I r ' -- LJ � � � o � o a �, SE 186th St Q � � � � � � t� � q � � � � � > � a � o � � � � � Q ❑ � � o c� �,r� � � �� Q SE 188th St o � s � � d � � Qo Q � �'I � � � o � � � Q � � � � � Fa! k An nexation � 30° 600 Exhibit 2: Existing Structures 1:3,600 G1�Y o� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � Existing Structure � ♦.+ A1exPietsch,actingAdministrator � �� Existing Corporate Boundary G.Del Rosario ��NT� 19December2002 Proposed Annexation Boundary .. !M:'_._ , _ y-- � I - � � I I .: ,..Kr: , . CITY OF RENTON ..,,.. ,-::. `: CURRENT�PLANNING`'DIVISION;�.;. : ;: . ;. , . . ; : .. ..:. . :. .:. .. . -_. . . : �:.:: � . _ °`: . .: ::::: :::: AFFI.DAVIT:OF SERVICE'BY`MAILING _... .: :.:-:. .; ,..:.. On the�day of �a ka.r , 2003, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope"containing ��-�P r m�n.��-j-n e ��i�n h�-�, documents. This information was sent to: Name Representinq L-i 6'�" ,D (Signature of Sender) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that /r�cc,�O e� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntar ct for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: � � a3- 0 3 , �� }��-F Notary Public i nd for the State of Washi ton �0°�� PV�LIC Notary(Print)_�w,,,,,��t�e�f� STATEOF WASNINGTON My appointment ex��eo^,.,,,,.�w,T�.,,,,,,�,,: „,,,,_�3 COMPVdISSI�f� �;tPIFiES JUR9��, 2Q03 Project Name: ��.A oa - o�9 ,9 �2 �c.r Project Number: � F41k An�+e.xa.frb,� � _� �ezoh� NOTARY.DOC .. �'.T a _ �+ � I 1 AGENCY(DOE)LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology Washington Dept. of Fish&Wildlife Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Environmental Review Section Habitat Program Attn. SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard 39015— 172"d Avenue SE OI m ia,WA 98504-7703 Mill Creek,WA 98012 Auburn,WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Mr. David Dietzman Attn: Ramin Pazooki 14235 Ambaum Blvd. SW—Front A Dept. of Natural Resources King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Burien,WA 98166 PO Box 47015 PO Box 330310 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers Ms. Shirley Marroquin Eric Swennson Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Real Estate Services PO Box C-3755 KC Wastewater Treatment Division Seattle Public Utilities Seattle,WA 98124 201 South Jackson St, MS KSC-NR-050 Suite 4900, Key Tower Attn: SEPA Reviewer Seattle,WA 98104-3855 700 Fifth Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom,AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton,WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72"d Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle,WA 98059 Kent,WA 98032-5895 Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager City of Tukwila Metro Transit PO Box 90868 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street MS: XRD-01W Tukwila,WA 98188 KSC-TR-0431 Bellevue,WA 98009-0868 Seattle,WA 98104-3856 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS",the following agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. Also note, do not mail David Dietzman any of the notices he gets his from the web. Only send him the ERC Determination paperwork. Last printed 10/22/02 3:57 PM - . � , , �:, ,; �_�"� CITY�)F RENTON „LL PlanninglBuilding/PublicWorks Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 16, 2003 . Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section . PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the � � Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on January 14,2003: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE FALK ANNEXATION R-8 REZONE LUA-02-019,A,R,ECF� The applicant, Steve Beck, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 5.96 acre annexation site (excluding streets)from King Gounty's R-1 Zone to Renton's R-8 Zone. The current site is the northern section of the previousfy proposed original Falk Annexation of 13.66 acres. Because annexations are SEPA exempt(RCW 43.21 C.222)this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's R-8 zoning the+6.43 acre site(including street r.ight-of-way)could theoretically accommodate approximately 46 dwelling units, assuming 8 du/net acre. Because of steep slopes on a portion of the site the actual number of units allowed may be less than 46 units. The proposed rezone is consistent with . Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Ma�. Location:The 6.43 acre site is located to the west of 102"�Avenue SE in King County and south of S 47 Street in Renton. The City of Renton abuts the subject site on its north and west. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 3,2003. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearin.g Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110E. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-6581. For the Environmen ommittee, ✓ � Don Erickson Senior.Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division � Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries � David F. Dietzman,Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) �\``�\b� US Army Corp.of Engineers \ � Enclosure agencyle er. oc 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N �Thispapercontains50%recycledmateria1,30%postconsumer . AHEAD OF THE CURVE ;' >i �;, ,; i I , ` CITY��F RENTON .,LL Planning/BuildinglPublicWorks Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 16, 2003 Steven A. Beck 4735 NE 4th St. Renton;WA 98059 SUBJECT: Falk Annexation &Prezone LUA-02-019,ECF,A,R � Dear Mr. Beck: This letter is writte� on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental .impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on January 14, 2003, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non- Significance. � The City of Renton ERC has determined that if does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 3, 2003. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110E. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510.If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-6581. r the Environment I Revie ommittee, . M . Don Erickson Senior Planner cc: Nina Falk J. &M. MacKenzie, L. Longo,J. &S. Claeys, R. McNair, D. Metts . /1ri " �I �(¢�03 . � . dns�etter. oc 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U RV E � CITY OF RENTON � DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-02-019,A,R,ECF APPLICANT: Nina Falk PROJECT NAME: Falk Annexation R-8 Rezone DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Steve Beck, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 5.96 acre annexation site (excluding streets) from King County's R-1 Zone to Renton's R-8 Zone. The current site is the northern section of the previously proposed original Falk Annexation of 13.66 acres. Because annexations are SEPA exempt(RCW 43.21 C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's R-8 zoning the+ 6.43 acre site (including street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate approximately 46 dwelling units, assuming 8 du/net acre. Because of steep slopes on a portion of the site the actual number of units allowed may be less than 46 units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The 6.43 acre site is located to the west of 102"d Avenue SE in King County and south of S 47th Street in Renton. The City of Renton abuts the subject site on its north and west. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 3, 2003. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110E. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: January 20, 2003 DATE OF DECISION: January 14, 2003 SIGNATURES: � � C/� regg i erma , inistr or DA E Depa t of anning/Building/Public Works � ,� � ' / / �l p im Shepher , Admi ' trator DA E �Community Services Department ,�C% �� /� � ,. ` � f- /'�'�� / e�'W eeler, ire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department dnssign..doc 1 1 . . . . �:'!' '��'. ,��'Ii'uil�� ;'��' ' ��.:'�;: � �, i . . .'�� .� . . �':i . � '. �i '� . . � ,�. . .�. ... .: . . � . .. .. . �r� .� .:�:: . � � .. .�� ENVIRONNi,ENTAL �: �' � + ' . , .. . . . _ , . . . .„ .,,,R , � � . IT , :. . _ ... ,.. EUIEW'.COMM :TE°E� � . - �,r _ . , - E:`:-. �µ� �::N' TI�C ;,: . , :I G` O _ .;,,..... .:, . M'EET N �... , ,. ... _ , : � - - - - , .: . ;.,: , ,,, .,.. . ..,: , t;... ....... ... __ , . .. . , . . ,. . . ; .:; . ,,, _ :. .� �. ... _.... .:. .. .. .. �,,,..:: . ....... . .. . . .. . . „ . ,... . _ . .. . „ ., . ..:. . - ::,:�,�:�-=.,,:: . .. . . . _ . _ , , _ .. � _ , . .., , , , ,.., . .. . ., . .. .. .,,�, .. . ,.., . �.. :: -. : . .._. :: .. ..,. , . � . _ ;=;,:,;Y:.::�; .t., , , .� �.. .,: . �_. , .� �;�_.�,;..._�: _ . � . ..,. � . . . ..,�.�. .. : ., , . . _. ... -- :.,, _, , ... . �. 1,. �,�„ :,.„ ,..,. �... . ,,.,:,. , ., :—,. , . ;�':, _ ,:M...�,: - - � CONSENT.AGENDA�.ti . ..,,.. , .. . ..., .,,,.,, . .. _ ..,,..:.: { . „ .,. .�.... ... .... . . .. . .. _ . .. . , s ,, ... , .�,�. . , ,, .. ,:,: �,,.. � � , ,„ ,.. . , � . � . ., ., . . .:._,. ��.. , . ,: ,,, �. � .,,.,,,, , .,. �r:�� ,.,.�,,,, s.... .. . . ....... .,.,.,, .. ..:. :.;:-,... ,, .. ,: , ... � ,. ... .. . .. ..:.. ....... .. . : � . , .,,�.f ,....0.:...... ... ..::..:. ,:�.� . .� . ,,, _,. . . . ....... ....... . ..... �,..�. , . .... .... ,. „ X:,:�z� - ;��;:;�,: � �,. r,.,, .';; ,,,. r,. ;y�. �,.,.,�.�,.�,d, . .. . .. .......: ,.,:a'-5•..:, �p�.,. r i,�.. �. .., ,:..-:,, „ � . ,� .. ,r. �� ' ,,,:'ql.,,... .� � f 4 Ti,;�,;�: ": .��:: ,� .�, . ..:. .�i „ �� '" r° "'� 6 �'"'t`,�� '(I i . � ». :� , �.::- ...,�� ... .�....,. ... .. ; �.�� .� ,!: �.... ,. � ��IS � . ., , . _... .� � � �! ;1'�...' . .��"�; , . :'. '1::� '..��,��:��.: �� '�� , � '.N�i��:�� . ��lF�"Ns•� ..::'.,,... . ,�..,. ..,.,. ,: � .,.., .� ...,_,...... .. ..:..:.�.� .,:,,,, U . �RY_1.4��0.03 � . , . .. .,, , .� „ . ...: . .......",.. :.� .. .:.JAN �A ., �,�:,� .i�,� �. :! U�eiw:'��'. :Nr:`. „�„7�',, . � ,.;.x,�.�.�,, . ... . ...-:,,. ��tii ,�.n.,. . _,,.,.i�,,., ��i� ��p•y "�i,4U:��'f'� .a.' '��' ,I... �::4�.,M1�t � ' ...�..i�_� < . �r . . :�.r �......�. .�� . . .�....-:�.... . � . ,:�u . ...�.�':� ;x�. �'4i I�'ii. 1 ik4:+ �id. !!� *�.... . . . . . .�I� t.��....,.... '.�.�_i..:,;�.v�..�v,�. 1'�`e�; s : .':^ ..y a, il^��1'�I'�'i al,Y . . �. -�i, .,�,i. ' , ._... .r' '�.:'�.�.�,.�. ' ;I i�i.".'" i_ •'.i'k - . . 'i�,.,r>"' . . ., � - 'P�'"J�„ .. . . . , .. , :sf.. .. .;,. ,......i;� ' ' .: '..�.,.. �� ,.. . .. . , , . . .. .:......�r_?!;.: �.��, �' , , : ..._.� _" ;t,�'��'`'�� ` ,.. ,:; ..�,i �� .".. ..,,...,.; . . . . . . �:,,. ,..�,... . : .. �� ,,,�,�i�,,.,: ' "�:�;� ,;.iq'l . ...� : :, ,,,. �: .t �.� � . ,, r,,.��,�,�s, ;,'.f,�.., . . . . ..� .�.� �; ..:� ��<.,..:,.. � ,.. � ....�,.. :. , � - � ;�7:,�.'.`'.�:'.� . . ... �i ,,,.... . - . :'` � _ _ ; � � . .. ...:.... ... ��.. :... .,.' , ... '.. �,. ,>.: .i'' it ';�'�� - r"{.:: .;:.'„�;.� . ... :., ..„ , . , ..� , .__, .. . � ..J� , ., ;. . . . ".,�..., - ,,; ,_:>:... _.. . . ... ..__ -.: . .� .i, . . .: :_ . , . ,.��.�.� . . .. ,. � , � .� '��. ,. ... .. . . ... .... . .� � ,,,,i..� - _ ,:..:.-.•:-. . �.� .. t..i _ ,::. ' p,i�Ii.� ,,,`„� .,�-.` „I ,.,.: .,A.:4:;,, To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Jim Shepherd, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning .., .. . _ _ .. :�...:.: ..::... .:.: <,�_�� - - - ,.....: ..:;: -.,.::.._., : , . , ,:, ... -: _ _ ;;�:., _ .. ,: ., , . ..,. : - . . _ a f• " . . . . " •,.': :.�.��y �.. , � .� , � ....�� .� . �'• '.s ' _ - ",r�i`'::��'::�.•?'�.:.��_"'. 3:.;_:�_.;.-,:��;n;�;=:`::.�:.:F:za,;;.'..,��:�"� ..��.:,.,�....,. - - �Janua ::;14 �200 � ;, e in ��Date.:,,...,. ��.,Tuesda..; , ...�..,_..,::�:.,. �r�. Me, t _ _ .. _. . ,,,.,,,. :.._ rY . .�._,.,��. �_ . .. - ... .9 , � Y � .,..,G r,,,.:� ,.. , ,� .. .., . .. ._:. . , , . „_, __ . .,. :. ;.. ;:�� . , . . , ...::::: . , . . . .- . � .� ::-. . ..: ,,..,_ , . . . ,...,,...: . . ., .:�,:...� :.�:.� ., , � , . . . ..�,.. _. _.. .�, �.. :, : - : ,,--��, <....,. , , ., ..,..,..., _, ;� �. �;:.; ;.,, „ ", r,� .:, . � ,- �,. ,,:... ;i'r.';� ':i: � ,. .,.,.,...� . L .. :. •. �.,. �.,,., . .,.,..: . . .:,.. ,.:. ,, ,. 00 AM. .,� ; .,.. , : 9.. ..�,, ,. .. .. ., .. . Time. .... ....... .. .: . ...G � ... �. ... ... .. . . a.,, ... , , . . ,. :,. ,... . .. ,.,_.,.... . ... . . , . _, , , , . . .. ' .,,:,:,,.. Location• ,. . Sixth;;FloorrConference;.Ro;om.#6,20 ,,,; .,:, ., �:,.,;.. ;��;;;,;�..,,,, , : ,.,,: ��..,._,; .., ,,.,,,.; ,:: �,;��, ,�,; ;;;, �,��;;,,; ,,, , „ , ,.� �.., .�,� ,,,. Agenda listed below. PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS A CONSENT AGENDA, THERE WILL NOT BE A MEETING F�'s Rezone (Hi_q_qins) LUA-02-149,ECF,R Rezone of approximately 21.37 acres of land designated Employment Area—Transition (Interim)from Heavy Industrial to Center/Office/Residential 3. Location: east of Garden Ave. N. and north of 8�'St. Falk Annexation and Prezone (Erickson) LUA-02-019,ECF,A,R The applicant, Steve Beck, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 5.96 acre annexation site (excluding streets) from King County's R-1 Zone to Renton's R-8 Zone. The current site is the northern section of the previously proposed original Falk Annexation of 13.66 acres. Because annexations are SEPA exempt(RCW 43.21C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's R-8 zoning the + 6.43 acre site (including street right-of- way)could theoretically accommodate approximately 46 dwelling units, assuming 8 du/net acre. Because of steep slopes on a portion of the site the actual number of units allowed may be less than 46 units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Location:The 6.43 acre site is located to the west of 102"d Avenue SE in King County and south of S 47th Street in Renton. The City of Renton abuts the subject site on its north and west. Retaininq Wall for Olvmpic Pipeline (Jordan) LUA-02-135,ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review in order to construct a 175-foot long retaining wall with varying heights (maximum of 13 feet above grade). The retaining wall is intended to stabilize the adjacent hillside so that pipeline personnel can access the pipeline and inspect and/or make any necessary repairs to the pipeline. The project area is estimated to be approximately 12,400 square feet. The applicant is proposing to make the retaining wall a permanent structure so that future inspections will be more readily accessible. The retaining wall is proposed to be located on Puget Sound Energy property, within an Olympic Pipeline easement. Project construction is planned to begin in spring of 2003 and be completed within an estimated time frame of five weeks. Location: 1600 South Eagle Ridge Drive. cc: J.Tanner,Mayor J.Covington,Chief Administrative Officer A Pietsch,EDNSP Director� J.Gray,Fire Prevention N.Watts,P!B/PW Development Services Director O F.Kaufman,Hearing Examiner L.Rude,Fire Prevention O J.Medzegian,Council S.Meyer,P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R.Lind,Economic Development L.Warren,City Attorney O li City of Renton STAFF Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and REPORT Strategic Planning ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE January 14, 2003 Project Name Falk Annexation R-8 Rezone Applicanf Steve Beck File Number LUA-02-019, A, R, ECF Projeci Manager pon Erickson Projecf Description The applicant, Steve Beck, has requested Environmental Review for the proposed rezoning of this 5.96 acre annexation site (excluding streets) from King County's R-1 Zone to Renton's R-8 Zone. The site is located at the corner of S. 47th Street (Renton) and 102"d Avenue SE (King County). The current site is the northern section of the previously proposed original Falk Annexation of 13.66 acres. Because annexations are SEPA exempt (RCW 43.21 C.222) this environmental review is only for the rezone. Under Renton's R-8 zoning the ± 6.43 acre site (including street right-of-way) could theoretically accommodate approximately 46 dwelling units, assuming 8 du/net acre. Because of steep slopes on a portion of the site the actual number of units allowed may be less than 46 units. The proposed rezone is consistent with Renton's Residential Single Family land use designation, as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Project Location The 6.43 ac te site is located to the west of 102"d Avenue SE in King County and south of S 47 Street in Renton. The City of Renton abuts the subject site on its north and west. Exist. Bldg.Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A Site Area 6.43 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A SITE MAP See attachment below. Project Location Map ero repon.do� '� ' � d ❑ 7 � � ,i� [� � � 0 � � n o � u�� a �, SE 186th St Q � 4 � � d � Q � � ; C� � a 0 4 � �! � � � � o � � Q ❑ �' �1 Q SE 188th St o � S L� � � �] Q� p � �I �t � o � C� Q � � � � � � Falk Annexation ° 3°° 6°° Exhibit 2: Existing Structures � 1:3,600 o Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Shategic Planning w Existing Structure ... ��s�� Existing Corporate Boundary c.Del Rosano '� Nzo �9n��zooz � Proposed Annexation Boundary �_�� /�/�,�^�� Jr,-� c � ' ��`\��\�t�� :� � �/ � �� -� I�� '� �i'� ''--,,� �� . �� .%�r� �� -=-� � .� , - �� , >>��\��.�� .�. ,� ��,,,, � --� �,�� `�;�,��,��-�, �� i�� I/;/ , 1�� A� � ��\\�s�_�,\ �� \\� � � l� , �`ii , �' . I� ��— ��\� ��- 1; ,� ,x , , ,, _ ,�� Ir�� _ \ \\\ \\�� ^ , � � � �/ ; � � � ,��\�� \\\ � =� � � �� S � �'�� __ ��\\�\�\\ \� i ,, )1 ,, �� / � , �J � � _ ��. I�� „))l � ��-�,� � , �Jf �� \�� o��\\� I�I, ��, ii�iii ,�,� �� a 1)�f��,--� ��\��\�� J�I �' '�1-�� f ti r�-� / ��\��\��` � ;� ,��,��,� �_ r//��,✓ �� \\�\��\`—� � y � �� , '��. J`�a=�%-;� � —J �II � ��\�\�\\� / �I� ��%��' � -�, 1/��`�,( / / � \\��\ �� J� � �-y %/�� /� �''� �� \\��- � � \� i ., ; � � _ �i/�� /��=� � � ��\�� //IJ�JIrI�� '.�� i�1� � � / � , � ��'� �1�� . _ _ �r-✓�5�� // —��\ ��J � �"" _: � � \ � � �� \� .,� � � . � � � � / � � �� \ �� i P �� i1 ' ;,� � � - f--��\ �� 1 �\� \\�� . �, //r - �_— � l/ 1 � �� , �� D �it I� �i�i�'J'� ' � 7 �, / '��. I� ' � � II / �� ' k� �\V • � �II� 1� � � .� Illl, .� ._. � . .l�l� �i�i _ � � . �. . o � � ��,�� ,� - „ � � �.�6�t '��i � "� � = � 0 � � � �'� �9A� I r F^ �i au o� 11��,��`'��Ill�l��l'��IIIIII ' � �. � '�" �� l,� �`I�, / �� - - . . % � � �,�,�� I�il��,� 51�� r� x �. r = . �i��lll��l �'�� I � .-. .o- . � �,, �,; 1 � r , .-- .� � pn II�I�� II`�((I�� i � .�. A �. �, �fl�llll�% � II �� 1 ) �( I • � • ,� .-� ^ ,��i�� i� ��ii i�f_ � �� J . � .� � �'�i�d <«l<« � � I � J . . x-� � o � �'�� , �� l l I � .� ), , � ��,��i�-� ... / E 8E� �5��- , I �` '`�� ' �/ '� / • Q � OM S)I � / ( aw � f:,l ^ � ,1 � / �v�I � % � �� g �'� � a • a� ��\ \\� �/ r �M- �• v �� / x / � 1 �� !( � � � � �� w py I � / I � � fll , \ 0\��\ % `�,�/ � / � � � M�Kr,� �' ��fJ� ��1 � .�� 1 � < � ,�� ,,,,,� ,, ��,�� `�` � �, � �- . . . � � Y � �� /I ` / )I \ � \ II ` - � ; / � • Y ,1,�`,I . �;. ��<<`i� � � � � � � 1 �� " SEI 188th S°�" � . . �� .�� , .� :.� 1 . � �� , , � �� -� ��\��'II��'� �� ,�, �� • .� ��. � � �� \�� J� �11111 , � ��1111� ,, �1J)) �� ( . � \� \\\\�� 1111�� ; � � .� ��\\\\�� (/ �«�`�1D� ( � �(�� ) 1 � � ..� -� �- � -� . x� � �'II � i IIII� I 11 I �� 1 / t� ■� � �� l I� ' � `'� �f R� �. �� \\\\\\ I � If F�� O x � x m � , � '�� ' I�� <<�� \� ` x�. llllll .,,,,, , �ll �� 1 � � �� .-. .�. Falk Annexation ° 300 6°° Exhibit 3: Topography 1'3 600 Uti�Y � Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Stretegic Planning 1 m Interval Contours � � ,.� Alex PiUsc�acting Administrator �� Existing Corporate Boundary G.Del Rosacio ��NTD 19December2002 - Proposed Annexation Boundary City of Renton EDNSP Department ' � Envir� 'ntal Review Committee Staff Repon FALKANNEXATION R-8 REZONE - � LUA-02-019,A,R,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF JANUARY 14,2003 Page2 of 3 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINAT/ON OF DETERMINAT/ON OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-S/GNIFICANCE-MIT/GATED. X Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period � with Concurrent 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGAT/ON MEASURES - None required for this non-project action. D. ENV/RONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following non-project environmental review addresses only fhose impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing deve/opment standards and environmenfal regulations. 1. Transporfafion Impacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action. Renton's R-8 zoning is clearly denser than King County's current R-1 zoning on the site. However, King County acknowledges that the current R-1 zoning is inappropriate given the density of development already in the area. King County has been working with the City of Renton on a reclassification of this area from Greenbelt/Urban Separator to Urban Residential 4-12 du/acre for this area. Generally, low density single-family detached residential of the type that would occur under R-8 zoning is assumed to create ± 10 Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends per dwelling unit. Forty-six potential dwellings would then potentially create 460 vehicle trip ends per week day. Spread out over a number of hours throughout the day this potential number of trips is not anticipated to have a significant adverse impact. MitiQation Measures: None recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. E. COMMENTS OF REV/EWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental / Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these commenfs have been incorporated into the texf of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Commenfs are aftached fo this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 3� , 2003. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110E. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ' erc report.doc b` , � , �� .. ....�,.: _ . . : ,,... , ... , ,, . . ,,C . ... ,:, :. `;,' ity Q,f.�Renfon,;::''�� , „ . .... . . ,. . .:.:... .....: ....:...:�, ,� ,�,: ,::.; ,: ;.. ., , . : , , ,,. , ... . ,. , ,... � ,,, .. .,, ,, , � ENVIR �NNI'ENTAL CHECKCIST'., �,�:� ,. . ., ,.. ... _,.,. � :,,�. , ,..� ,:;�,,. �,:,,:. . .,Q, PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The Stafe Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all govemmental agencies to consider the environmental impacfs of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) musf be prepared for all proposals wifh probable significanf adverse impacts on fhe quality of fhe environment. The purpose of this checklist is fo provide informafion fo help you and fhe agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklisf asks you to describe some basic informaiion aboui your proposal. Governmenfal agencies use this checkJist fo determine whether the environmental�impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an E/S. Answer the quesfions briefly, with fhe most precise information known, orgive the best descripfion you can. You musf answer each question accurafely and carefully, fo fhe besi of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able fo answer the quesfions from your own observations or project plans without the need fo hire experts. If you really do nof know the answer, or if a question does not apply fo your proposal, wrife "do nof know"or "does not apply". Complete answers to fhe questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulafions, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. !f you have problems, fhe governmental agencies can assist you. The checklisf quesfions apply fo all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do fhem over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Aftach any additional information fhat will he/p describe your proposa/or its environmenfal effects. The agency to which you submif this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related fo determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKL/ST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered"does not apply." !N ADDITION, complete fhe SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonprojecf actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), fhe references in the checklist to the words "project,""applicanf,"and"property or site"should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and"affectedgeographicarea,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Proposed rezone of approximately 5.96 acre area from King County's R-1 Zone to Renton's Residential 8 du/ac (R-8)Zone. Zoning would be applied at the time the subject site is annexed into the City of Renton. 1� Falk Annexation Rezone ,-,, January 3, 2003 F � � Page 2 " ' 2. Name of applicant: Alex Pietsch, Acting Administrator, Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning Department City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contacf person: Address: Economic Development, Neighborhoods& Strategic Planning Department City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Contacf Person: Don Erickson,AICP (425) 430-6581 4. Date checklist prepared: January 3, 2003 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works - Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): Adoption of the rezone ordinance is anticipated pending SEPA compliance, at the time of annexation into Renton. 7. Do you have any p/ans for future addifions, expansion, or further acfivity relafed to or connected with fhis proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. Applicants have applied for annexation into the City of Renton. Under RCW 43.21.C.222 annexations are specifically exempt from SEPA. Upon annexation into Renton applicants or their successors will likely subdivide and develop vacant properties with single-family dwellings per the City of Renton's R-8 zoning. 8. Lisf any environmenfal informafion you know about fhat has been prepared, or will be prepared, direct/y relafed to fhis proposal. FEIS on the 1995 Comprehensive Plan of the City of Renton 9. Do you know whefher applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals direcf/y affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No knowledge of other pending governmental approvals of affected properties. Possible King County redesignation of GreenbelUUrban Separator designation to Urban Residential, 4-12 du/acre. 10. Lisf any governmental approvals or permits fhat will be needed for your proposal, if known. Council approval is required for this rezone from County to City zoning. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including fhe proposed uses and fhe size of the project and site. The subject proposal is to rezone the revised 5.96-acre Falk Annexation (excluding streets from King County's R-1 Zone (1 du/gross acre),to Renton's R-8 Zone(8 du/net acre). The site could accommodate approximately 40 dwellings under Renton's R-8 Zone and approximately 13 dwellings under King County's R-1 Zone. King County is currently amending its Comprehensive Plan and�nrill likely redesignate the area along the West Side of 102"d Avenue SE south of S 47 Street from Greenbelt/Urban Separator to Urban Residential 4-12du/acre. The King County Growth Management Planning Committee has reviewed and supported such a 7 � Falk Annexation Rezone - , ��fanuary 3, 2003 Page 3 � - change. 12. Locafion of fhe proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township,and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a lega!description,site plan, viciniry map,and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit appfications related to this checklist. The subject annexation site is located immediately south of South 47�'Street(in Renton) and extends approximately 410-feet to the south along 102"d Avenue SE (in King County). Properties to the north and west of the site are in the City of Renton. (Please see attachments.) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. Genera! description of the site (circle one); flaf, rolling, hiUy, steep slopes, mounfainous, ofher The 5 95-acre rezone site is rolling being relatively flat in its middle and southeastern portions but slopes more steeplv to the west and its northeast corner The western portion drops about 30 feet and the northeast corner drops about 15 feet. B. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope?) Renton Slope Maps indicate some small areas with slopes of 25% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? !f you know fhe classification of agr�cu/tural soils, specify them and nofe any pr�me farmland. Alderwood Association. d. Are there surface indications or history of unsfable soils in fhe immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Although there are 15% to 25% slopes on the site, these have not been mapped as unstable soils. e. Describe fhe purpose, fype, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-proiect annexation and rezone �roposal. Erosion presumably could occur as a result of future development under the proposed R-8 Zone. Mitigation measures would be applied typically at the time of future development. g. About whaf percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 35%. No construction is proposed as a result of this non- project legislative proposal. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts fo fhe earth, if any: ' � No construction is proposed as a result of this non-proiect leQislative rp oposal. Any future development occurring as a consequence of the proposed R-8 Zone would be required to follow management practices in the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Regulations (RMC 4-4-130)and in the Falk Annexation Rezone, - - January 3, 2003 ` � Page 4 � , Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations (RMC 4-4-060). 2. ' A/R a. What types of emissions fo the air wou/d resu/t from fhe proposa!(i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A. No new construction is proposed as a result of this legislative non- project proposal. At the time of project level development specific air-related impacts may be identified and appropriate mitigation measures applied. b. Are fhere any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,generally describe. Unknown. Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacfs fo air, if any: Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. 3. WATER a. Surtace Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediafe vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal sfreams, sa/twafer, lakes, ponds, weflands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropr�ate, sfate what stream or river it flows info. No. The annexation sits on a ridge overlooking the Renton Valley area. 2) Wil!the project reguire any work over, in, or adjacent to(within 200 feet) fhe described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Esfimate the'amount of fill and dredge maferial that wou/d be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicafe fhe area of fhe sife thaf wou/d be affected. lndicate the source of fill maferial. N/A. No construction is proposed immediately as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 4) Will the proposal require surface wafer withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A. No construction is proposed immediately as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 5) Does the proposa/ lie within a i00 year floodplain? If so, nofe location on fhe site p/an. No.The subject site is not mapped.as part of the 1-year floodplain. 6) Does fhe proposal involve any discharges of waste maferials to surface waters? If so, describe fhe type of wasfe and anficipated volume of discharge. ,. � Falk Annexation Rezone ' , ��anuary 3, 2003 Page 5 - � -- No. This is a non-project legislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this proposal. � b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or wiH water be discharged to ground wafer? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A. This is a non-project legislative action. The proposed rezone is not expected to result in the discharge or withdrawal of water that is not now occurring. 2) Describe waste maferial that will be discharged into the ground from � septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domesfic sewage;industrial, containing the following chemicals...;agricu/tural; eta). Describe fhe general size of fhe sysfem, fhe number of such systems, fhe number of houses to be served (►f applicable), or the number of animals or humans the sysfem(s)are expected to serve. No construction is qroposed as a result of this non-project leqislative ro osal. No new septic tanks are anticipated as a result of this rezone. It is anticipated that development that may occur under the City's jurisdiction would connect to sanitary sewers. a Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantifies, if known). Where will this water flow? Will fhis water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A. No construction and therefore runoff is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. Surface water appears to run off the site in a north/northwesterly direction towards the lower Panther Creek Sub-basin which is within the Black River Basin (Springbrook Creek), which in turn is a tributary of the Green/Duwamsih River. Although no new development is proposed at this time the proposed zoning would allow higher densities which could result in increased amounts of runoff and poorer water quality in the future. Environmental review, however, would be required for such development prior to the time it occurred in the future. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. Future new residential development would be hooked up to sanitary sewer. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts,if any: Not applicable since this is a non-proiect leaislative action. Future development allowed under the R-8 Zone would be required to comply with City of Renton Drainage Standards (RMC,4-6-030). 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle fypes of vegetafion found on fhe site: X deciduous tree:alder,maple,aspen, other X evergreen tree:fir, cedar,pine, other Falk Annexation Rezone January 3, 2003 ' ' Page 6 . X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: wafer lily, eel grass, milfoil, ofher ofher fypes of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? N/A. No construction and therefore no vegetation will be removed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. Future development will have to comply with Renton's Tree Cutting regulations (RMC 4-4-130). c. Lisf threatened or endangered species known to be on or near fhe site. None are known at this time. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on fhe sife, if any: Not applicable. This is a non-project action. As noted above, development that occurs under Renton's jurisdiction must conform to the City's codes and regulations. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near fhe site or are known fo be on or near the site: Birds:hawk,heron, eagle, songbirds other Mammals: ee bear, elk, beaver, other Fish:bass, salmon, trouf, herring, shellfish, ofher b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near fhe site. , No threatened or endangered species are known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Unknown. but the entire State of Washington is included within a migration route for birds known as the Pacific Flyway. This flyway, as it overlies Renton, is used by a variety of migratory birds, including, but not limited to the Canada Goose. � d. Proposed measures fo preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: This is a non-proiect lepislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this rezone proposal. Mitigation measures, if any, may be imposed at the time of future development. � , Falk Annexation Rezone ' �anuary 3, 2003 Page 7 - -- ` 6. ENERGYAND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used fo meet fhe completed projecf's energy needs? Describe whether if will be used forheafing, manufacfuring, etc. It is anticipated that the potential 40 dwellinq units the R-8 zonin4 would allow on the site will use primarily electrical and natural gas resources for heating and running appliances. b. Would your project affect the pofentiaf use of solar energy by adjacenf properties? If so,generally descrrbe. Unlikel . Zoning provides some setbacks and restricts heights of new structures to 30 feet. c. What kinds of energy conse►vafion feafures are included in the plans of this proposal? List ofher proposed measures to reduce or confrol energy impacts, if any: None. This is a non-project leQislative action. Future development occurring on the site will meet all related energy code provisions. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental hea/th hazards, including exposure fo foxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that cou/d occur as a resulf of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services fhat mighf be required. N/A. This is a non-project legislative action. No special services are anticipated from future single-family residential development. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or confrol environmental healfh hazards, if any: N/A. Tfiis is a non-project legislative action. b. Noise 1) What fypes of noise exist in fhe area which may affect your project (for example:traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Not a�plicable since this is a legislative non-proiect action. 2) Whai types and levels of noise would be creafed by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise wou/d come from the site. Not applicable. New development occurring under the R-8 Zone could include construction activity and normal noise associated with ground related residential living. 3) Proposed measures fo reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. This is a non-project action. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the currenf use of the site and adjacenf properties? The majority of the 5.96 acre rezone site is either vacant or partial developed with lower density single family homes and existing street right-of-ways. Existing densities are not believed to exceed 3 du/ac. Has the site been used for agriculture?If so, describe. Falk Annexation Rezone �—� , January 3, 2003 ' ' Page 8 � _ ' . No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are an estimated two existing sinale-familv dwellings on the subject 5.96 acre rezone site. d. Will any strucfures be demolished? If so, what? This is a legislative non-proiect rezone action. It is not anticipated that this proposed rezone will result in the demolition of any structures. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current King Countv zoninq classification is the R-1 Zone which allows 1 du/gross acre. The current proposal is for R-8 zoning that allows 8 du/net acre. f. Whaf is fhe current comprehensive p/an designafion of the site? The 5.96 rezone acre site is currently designated"Residential Single Familv" on Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and "GreenbelVUrban Separator" on King County's Comprehensive Plan Map. Renton's designation would allow zoning with up to 8 units per net acre and King County's designation currently allows zoning with only 1 unit per gross acre. The City and County have been working together over the last few months to find a more appropriate land use designa�ion in the County, noting that current densities along the west side of 102" Avenue SE exceed 1 du/acre. - g. If applicab/e, whaf is the current shoreline master program designafion of fhe site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the sife been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,specify. Renton's Sensitive Areas Maps identify the subject site as having some 15% to 25% slopes in the southeastern portion of the site and in its northeastern corner. No erosion areas were identified. i. Approximately how many people wou/d reside or work in the completed project? At full redevelopment under the proposed R-8 zoning, it is anticipated that approximately 100 residents could reside on these 5.96 acres. j. Approximately how many people wou/d the completed projecf disp/ace? Unknown. This is a non-project action. The estimated five existing residents could choose, for example, to relocate to new dwellings within the annexation area. k Proposed measures fo avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable at this non-project stage. l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with exisfing and projected land uses and plans, if any: As noted above the proposed rezone is consistent with the City's current Residential Single Family land use designation for the subject site. As noted above discussions with King County are likely to lead to relocating their designated urban separator to the west, more accurately reflecting the existing steep slopes between the plateau and the valley area below. � � Falk Annexation Rezone ; '�anuary 3, 2003 � Page 9 �-� 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Unknown. It is anticipated that up to 40 dwelling units could be accommodated on the subject site under Renton's R-8 zoning. b. Approximately how many units, if any, wou/d be eliminated? Indicate whether high,middle, or low-income housing. Unknown. The proposed rezone will not eliminate any units by itself. As future development occurs the two existing dwellings may be replaced and/or relocated although this is not currently known. c. Proposed measures fo reduce or control housing impacts, if any: The proposed zoning is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and applicable policies for this area. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the fallesf height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the princ�pal exterior build�ng material(s)proposed. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. No new development is specifically proposed as a result of this change in zoning classification. Heights of residential structures are restricted to 30' in the proposed R-8 Zone b. What views in fhe immediate vicinity would be altered or obstrucfed? Unknown. This is a non-project rezone action. This is not known at this level. c. Proposed measures fo reduce or control aesthefic impacts,if any: Unknown. At the future project level impacts will be assessed and mitigated. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. Whaf type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What fime of day wou/d it mainly occur? Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. Future development may create some visible nighttime light. b. Could light or glare from the �nished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Unknown. Future single-family homes are not anticipated to result in sufficient levels of glare to impair views from surrounding properties. c. What existing off-sife sources of lighf or glare may affect your proposal? Unknown. - d. Proposed measures fo reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. 12. RECREAT/ON a. Whaf designated and informal recreafional opportunifies are in fhe immediate vicinity? A new City park is anticipated to be build on the former Cleveland property near SE 192"d and South Talbot Road to the west. �� Falk Annexation Rezone . - January 3, 2003 • • Page 10 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No.This is a non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable at this non-project level of review. 13. H/STOR/C AND CULTURAL PRESERVAT/ON a. Are fhere any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next fo the site? If so, generally describe. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next fo the site. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures io reduce or control impacts, if any: Unknown. 14. TRANSPORTAT/ON a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is qrimarilv served by 102"d Avenue SE and secondarily by South 47 Street. b. Is site currently served by public fransit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transir stop? Not directiv. however there is bus service on Carr Road, some 1,000 feet to the north. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would fhe project eliminate? Unknown. Assuming 40 dwelling units and parking being provided between 1.75 spaces per unit and 2.25 spaces per unit, there potentially could be between 70 and 90 required off-street spaces developed over the 5.96-acre developable portion of the site. No spaces are anticipated to be eliminated. d. Wil! fhe proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Potentiallv. Future subdivision of the site would be required to comply with City regulations pertaining to street width, curbs, sidewalks, lighting, etc. At this point it is difficult to anticipate what improvements 37 new dwellings in the Falk Annexation area would require. New streets would most likely be local access streets or cul-de-sacs or loop streets. e. Will the project use (or occur in fhe immediate vicinity ofl water, rail, or air fransportation? If so,generally describe. No. � Y Falk Annexation Rezone ' inuary 3, 2003 Page 11 - f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed projecf? If known, indicate when peak volumes wou/d occur. This is a legislative non-project action in which transportation impacts have not been identified since the actual levels of development are still unknown. However, if 37 additional units were built, and assuming 10 AWDVTE, there could be as many as 370 additional vehicles trip ends per 24 hour period. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not a�plicable at this non-project level. Level of future development is speculative at this point. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Wou/d fhe project resulf in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protecfion, police protecfion, health care, schools, other)? If so,generally describe. Probabl . Residential development that might occur in the future would increase the need for public services that typically serve such development. Affected services may include, but would not be limited to, fire protection, police protection, emergency services,and schools. b. Proposed measures fo reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The City of Renton currently collects mitiQation fees to control such impacts to parks and recreation, fire, and transportation. The City also collects taxes for most of these services. Until a specific proposal is made at the project level, however, it is too early to ascertain what these impacts, if any,will be. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle ufilities currently available at the site: e/ectricify, natural gas, water, refuse service, ielephone,sanitary sewer,septic system, other. The current proposal is a non-project action. However, the area would likely be served by sewer,telephone, electricity, and water. b. Describe the utilities fhat are proposed for fhe projecf, the utility providing the service, and the general construction actiwties on the s�fe or in the immediate vicinity which mighf be needed. Unknown. Non-project action. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 7� /�l — Name Printed: `��"�� Date: � I�l�3 Falk Annexation Rezone ,:--� � -- , January 3, 2003 = � Page 12 ` , D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets shou/d only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill ouf these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful fo read ihem in conjunction wifh fhe lisf of the elements of fhe environment. When answering these questions, be aware of fhe exfent the proposal, or the types of acfivifies likely to result from fhe proposal, would affect the item at a greater infensity or at a faster rate fhan if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How wou/d the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;emissions to air, production, sforage, or release of foxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? This is a legislative non-proiect rezone action that is not anticipated by itself to change operations at the subject site or increase substance discharges into the environment. Subsequent development, whether under the current County R-1 zoning or the proposed City of Renton R-8 zoning, would be required to comply with SEPA at the time of development, unless categorically exempt. Any new development will likely increase discharges to air, water, etc. These, however, are anticipated to be relatively small. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: � This non-project leqislative action. Subsequent development as a result of this proposed code amendment will have to go through environmental review unless SEPA exempt. It is likely that air emissions, etc. would be addressed at this time when type and quantities of discharges are more likely to be known. Because Renton's R-8 Zone would allow greater densities than King County's R-1 Zone, impacts will be greater but still manageable. 2. How would fhe proposal be likely to affect p/ants,anima/s, fish, or marine life? No significant impacts to plants, animals, fish or marine life are anticipated to occur as a consequence of the proposed zoning action. The proposal would supplant existing County R-1 single-family zoning which allows 1 du/ac (gross) with R-8 single-family zoning, which allows 8 du/ac (net). As a result future development could be as much as six times denser than what is now allowed. Proposed measures fo protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Not applicable. 3. How would fhe proposal be Ilkely fo deplete energy or natural resources? This non-project leqislative action will not directly impact enerqy or natural resources. Future single-family development will, however, likely result in some additional demand of such resources. Future development under Renton's R-8 zoning would allow up to 37 additional homes in the area. The County's R-1 Zone would allow approximately 4 additional units. As a consequence the proposed zoning change would potentially increase the demand for energy and natural resources. Proposed measures to profect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None are proposed.since this is currentiv a non-project action. e ., t_ Falk Annexation Rezone �anuary 3, 2003 Page 13 4. How would fhe proposal be likely to use or affect environmenfally sensifive � areas or areas designated (or eligib/e or under study) for governmental profection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, fhreatened or endangered species habitat,historic or cu/tura/sites, weflands, f/oodplains, or prime farmlands? This non-project rezone proposal will not directly impact environmentally sensitive areas. There are some steep slopes of 25% pr greater on portions of the site. It is anticipated that future development will plan around these areas. Whether future development occurs under County or City zoning these sensitive areas would have to be addressed. Proposed measures to profecf such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None proposed at this time for this non-project action. � 5. How wou/d fhe proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whefher it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompafib/e with existing plans? This proposed non-project rezone will not directly affect land or shoreline use. The proposed R-8 Zone, however, implements the Residential Single Family land use designation which allows single-family housing at 8 du/net acre. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None proposed at this non-proiect level. As noted above any new development under the proposed R-8 zoning will be reviewed by the City to ensure compliance with relevant state and local regulations. 6. How would the proposal be like/y fo increase demands on transportafion or public services and utilities? This is a legislative non-�roject action. Future development would result in increased demands on transportation,the use of utilities, or other services over what is allowed under current King County zoning. If additional homes are built in this area as many as 460 additional vehicle trips per day could be generated over a 24-hour period. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: None are proposed for this non-project action. Future development will be asked to mitigate any identified significant impacts. 7. Identify, if possib/e, whether the proposal may conflict wifh local, state, or federal laws or requ�rements for the profection of the environment. No conflicts with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment are known to exist with the subject non-project legislative proposal. S/GNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. , Proponent: /'�� Name Printed: 1l`�c�"� �l r�j �f v��3 Date: _ -Y �� ;. January 13,2003 Renton City Council Minutes Page 22 . EDNSP: HoteUMotel Tax Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Revenue Allocation to recommended approval of a contract with Hamilton/Saunderson Marketing Community Stakeholders& Partnership for year five of the Renton Community Marketing Campaign. Barbecue&Blues Festival, Approval was also sought to allocate hoteUmotel tax revenues in the amount of Hamilton/Saunderson Contract $20,000 to the key community stakeholders partnership for a fourth year of the marketing campaign;and$30,000 for the proposed Renton Bazbecue&Blues Festival to be held in downtown Renton in September,2003. Refer to Finance Committee. Annexation:�-alk;S�`47:th t;& Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department �!��!�_.��'.' •TQ2nd A�e 5E+��-��o� recommended a public hearing.be set on 1/27/2003 to consider the resolution --�- - � ==��,� calling for an annexation election,and the proposed prezoning of R-8 for the ! �3�� proposed Falk Annexation;6.43 acres bounded by S.47th St.to the north,SE � 185th Pl.to the south,and 102nd Ave. SE to the east. Council concur. Annexation: Vuong,Anacortes Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Ave NE&NE lOth St recommended a public hearing be set on 1/27/2003 to consider the resolution � �V„ calling for an annexation election,and the proposed prezoning of R-8 for the . �� proposed Vuong Annexation;2.7 acres located east of Anacortes Ave.NE and � north of NE lOth St. Council concur. Finance:Finance Analyst II Finance and Information Services Department requested authorization to fill the Hire at Step D Finance Analyst II position at Step D of the salary range effective 1/1/2003. Refer to Finance Committee. Human Services: Joint Human Human Services Division recommended approval of an agreement with South Services Funding Program, King County cities for the planning,funding,and implementation of a joint South King County Cities human services application and funding program The City's cost share is $67,3(10. Refer to Committee of the Whole. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS At the request of Council President Keolker-Wheeler,Planning/Building/Public Public Works: Seattle Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman gave a briefing on the Seattle Public Utilities Pipeline ROW, Utilities(SPLn pipeline right-of-way located on Renton Hill. Mr.Zimmerman Renton Hill reported that discussions with SPU regazding emergency access to the new Heritage Hills plat brought to light the fact that the agreement allowing Renton to use the SPU right-0f-way between the Rolling Hills and Renton Hill communities expired in 1981;however,operations continued as if the agreement was still valid. He explained that the right-of-way is used by the public to access Philip Arnold Park and for emergency vehicle and school bus access to abutting neighborhoods. Reporting that the City is in communication with both SPU and the Renton School District regarding provisions for the new agreement with SPU,Mr. Zimmerman indicated that SPU wants the users of the right-of-way to provide, at their cost,litter control and pavement maintenance. He noted that the Community Services Department unlocks and locks the Rolling Hills gate every day,and earlier agreement negotiations proposed keeping the gate locked and providing bus drivers with keys to the gate. Mr.Zimmerman relayed that residents raised concerns regarding keeping the gate locked,and staff is now proposing to leave the gate procedure at its current status. He added that the Renton School District has volunteered to share _ responsibility with the City for picking up litter and providing pavement - F' �%��"'` � CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA B�,L AI#: Submitting Data: For Agenda of: January 13, 2003 Dept/DivBoard.. EDNSP/Strategic Planning Staff Contact...... Don Erickson(X6581) Agenda Status Consent..............X Subject: Public Hearing.. Falk Annexation Election Resolution and Prezoning Correspondence.. Ordinance............. Public Hearing on January 27, 2003 Resolution........... Old Business........ Exhibits: New Business....... • Issue Paper Study Sessions...... o Resolution Information......... Recommended Action: G��„�Q�� Approvals: Legal Dept......... Schedule January 27, 2003 �a presentation on the Finance Dept...... :: proposed Falk Annexa ' ri�and the first of two public Other............... hearings on appro 'ate prezoning for the property. Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Transfer/Amendment....... Required...N/A Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project.. SUNd1VIAI2Y OF ACTION: The Council referred the request for a Falk annexation election to the Administration on November 18, 2002. Because the site will need to be prezoned prior to coming into the City and two public hearings are required for the prezone, we have an opportunity to combine the presentation on the annexation with the first public hearing on the future City zoning for the property. The requested action is to initiate this process by setting a public hearing date. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: o Council set the date of January 27, 2003 for a presentation of the proposed Falk Annexation and consideration of a resolution authorizing an annexation election for the site. o Council also set the first of two required public hearings on the prezoning for this site on this'same date. H:�EDNSP\Council\Issue Papers-Agenda Bills-Ctte Reports�2002WGENDA BILL-Tydico Site Annexation Resolution.doc/ � � ' CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: December 30,2002 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler,President City Council Members VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Alex Pietsch,Acting Administrator �� Economic Development,Neighborhoods, &Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson(6581) SUBJECT: Falk Annexation Resolution and Public Hearing on Prezoning ISSUE: • Should the Council support and initiate an election annexation for the 6.43-acre proposed Falk Annexation? . • Should property owners within the Falk Annexation be asked to assume their fair share of the City's bonded indebtedness? • Should the Falk Annexation area, excluding public right-of-ways,be pre-zoned R-8 Zone? RECOMMENDATION: • Adopt a resolution authorizing an annexation election to consider the annexation of the Falk and Gustafson properties and abutting 102"d Avenue SE right-of-way to the City: ✓ Condition acceptance of the annexation on property owners within the annexation area assuming their fair share of the City's outstanding indebtedness. ✓ Require that the applicant reimburse the City for all King County costs associated with holding the election that are paid by the City. • Support prezoning the Falk Annexation site to R-8,Residential Single Family, 8 du/net acre. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The current proposed annexation was part of a larger (13.66-acre) annexation by the same name earlier this year. On March 4th,Council considered the 10%Notice of Intent for this annexation at a public meeting. On March 14th, the Washington State Supreme Court invalidated the "Property Owner Petition Method" of annexation finding that it "effectively grants owners of highly valued properiy a privilege not equally afforded to lower value property and nonproperly owning residents." The Court, however, let stand the "Election Method" of annexation. The applicant, Falk Annexation Resolutio zoning � 2 12/30/02 Steven Beck, has reduced the size of the former Falk Annexation to two parcels and the abutting street right-of-way. Although there are only two registered voters living on these two parcels, he feels confident that they will support the subject annexation and agree on behalf of existing and future property owners of the annexation area to assume their fair share of the City's outstanding indebtedness. Although a petition representing 10% of the registered votes in the proposed annexation area was submitted on November 15`�', it was decided to proceed with a Council resolution rather than waiting for the County Clerk to certify the signatures. This approach requires that Council adopt the attached resolution finding that it would be in the best interests and general welfare of the City to annex the subject two parcels and abutting street right-of-way. The resolution describes the property to be annexed as well as indicates whether the City will pay for the cost of the election. The resolution calls for an election on two issues: 1)whether the area is to be annexed, and 2) whether property owners within the annexation area will assume a proportionate share of the City's outstanding indebtedness. This revised application, at 6.43-acres, is smaller than the former application of a year ago. It is still located at the corner of S 47`i' Street (if extended) and 102"d Avenue SE in King County and includes the northern two parcels of the former proposal. Additional information on this revised annexation is included on the attached Falk Annexation Data Sheet. ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION: (Pursuant to City Council Resolution 2429) Consistencv with the Comprehensive Plan: The annexation policies generally support the proposed annexation. The subject annexation site is located within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and is within an area seeing increased development pressure (Policies LU-378 and LU-379, attached). Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for this area is Residential Single Family, which allows up to 8 dwelling units per net acre. Under King County's Comprehensive Plan land use designation and zoning the area is unlikely to achieve urban densities. It is currently designated"Greenbelt/Urban Separator" and zoned for one dwelling unit per acre. The City and the County have been in discussions about how to resolve this disparity. However, an agreement between King County, the Growth Management Planning Council and the City is now in place to remove this area from the Urban Separator in the adopted Countywide Planning Policies. As a result the City may rezone the property to a higher density upon annexation without contradicting regional planning agreements. Renton is the logical service provider of most urban services and infrastructure for this area(Policy LU-383, attached). Policy LU-388 states that in general, the greater the contiguity with the city limits, the more favorable the annexation. The proposed annexation is adjacent to the city limits along 50% of its perimeter. Policy LU-388 states that annexation boundaries should be "readily identifiable in the field". The proposal follows lot lines along its northern and eastern boundaries and existing parcels on its western and southern boundaries. There are no alternative boundaries to the south that would be more consistent with this policy, without substantially increasing the size of the proposed annexation. Consistency with the Boundary Review Board Objectives: (from RCW 36.93.180) a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities: The proposed annexation would cause no disruption to the larger community. H:�EDNSP�PAA�Annexations�Falk�Election Resolution Issue Paper.doc\jw Falk Annexation Resolution/ oning : 3 12/30/02 b. Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours; The proposed annexation follows city boundaries on two of its four sides,parcel lines on one side, and street right-of-way also on two of its four sides. c. Creation and preservation of logical service areas; With the exception of water and sewer service which are to be provided by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, the city is capable of providing all urban services to the proposed annexation area. The City currently serves the area north of South 49"' Street and west of the proposed annexation. d. Prevenlion of abnormally irregular boundaries; The proposed annexation has regular boundaries and is rectangular in shape. e. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and e�acouragemenl of incorporations of cilies in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas. Not applicable. f. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts; Not applicable. g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries Neither the existing City boundary nor the proposed new boundaries are impractical. h. Incorporation as cities or town or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; and, This area is designated for urban development in that it is located within King County's Urban Growth Boundary. i. Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term projective agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. No portions of the proposed Falk Annexation area are rural or designated for long term productive agricultural use in the King County Comprehensive Plan. Although the King County Comprehensive Plan currently designates this area as Greenbelt/Urban Separator. King County staff in their role as staff to the Growth Management Planning Council agreed to designate this area for urban development and remove it from the Urban Separator in exchange for more suitable land at another location. The City requested that King County redesignate the area as Urban Residential—4-12 du/ac with R-6 or R-4 zoning. Fiscal Impact of the Proposed Annexation: The project proponent anticipates future single-family residential development on the 5.96-acre non-street portion of the annexation area. Staff estimate up to 40 dwelling units with a population of 100 people could result. Estimated costs to the City based upon staffls most recent fiscal analysis indicate that costs would exceed revenues by approximately$679 per year over at least the initial years of the development(see attachments). H:�EDNSP�PAAWnnexations�Falk�Election Resolution Issue Paper.doc\jw Falk Annexation Resolution/ oning � 4 12/30/02 ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED R-8 PREZONING Consistency with Citv of Renton Rezone Criteria: 1. The rezone is in the public interest; � Prezoning the annexation site to a zone designation that is similar to sunounding uses is in the public interest. Also,providing this zoning now, as allowed in RCW 35.A.14.330-340 provides better predictability for those voting on this annexation. 2. The rezone tends to further the preservation and enjovment of anv substantial propert� h�of the petitioner; The prezoning of the annexation site will help ensure that the property owners retain development potential similar to that of other nearby properties having similar development potential. 3. The rezone is not material�detrimental to the public welfare or the properties of other persons located in the vicinity thereof; The proposed City's proposed R-8 zoning is considerable denser than the County's current R-1 (LTrban Separator)zoning. It was determined through the Growth Management Planning Council review process that R-1 (Urban Separator)zoning is inappropriate at this location. However,the R-8 zone would be compatible with the County's R-6 zoning since Renton's zoning calculates density based on net acres and the County calculates density based upon gross acres. Assuming net density as 80%of gross density,the number of units that could be developed is nearly identical under these two zones. 4. The rezone meets the review criteria in subsections Flb and Flc of this Section, i.e.the prope is potentiallv classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, and, As noted above the property is potentially classified for the R-8 zone because it is designated as Residential Single Family on City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. 5. The subject reclassification was not specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zonin� or since the most recent land use analysis or area zonin�authorized public improvements private development or other circumstances affectin�the propertv have under o��nificant and material chan�e. Since the last area zoning there have been significant changes in the area with new subdivisions developing to the west, east and south.Also,the subject annexation site is within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and is designated for annexation under adopted City and County policies. CONCLUSION: The proposed annexation is generally consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies related to annexations and Boundary Review Board objectives for annexation. No impediments to the provision of City services to the area have been identified at this early stage. In terms of future H:�EDNSP�PAAWnnexations�Falk�Election Resolution Issue Paper.doc\jw Falk Annexation Resoluho omng � 5 12/30/02 zoning for the site,the R-8 zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as well. King County staff and the Growth Management Planning Council have also supported the removal of the Urban Separator designation. This redesignation allows consideration of a higher density zoning for the site upon annexation. The fiscal impacts of this proposed annexation are also relatively minor with a one time estimated cost of$21,320 dollars for parks and an on-going annual cost of an estimated$680 dollars per year at full development. Attachments cc: Don Erickson H:�EDNSP�PAA�Annexarions�Falk�Election Resolution Issue Paper.doc\jw PROPOSED FALK ANNEXATION FI ANALYSIS CALCULATION SHEEI � Units Po ulation AV Existin dev. 4 10 $776,000 Full dev. 40 100 $13,599,000 Assumptions: 2.5 persons/household $275,000 AV/new unit ...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::::.:.:.:.:.:.:.: <�_1 existing house will not redevelop :.. ��. : : . ,.; p�;��:::::::::::::: ota revenues � � �� Existin Full Rate Existing::::::::::::::::$�:;(�H�:34: Re ular le $2,530 $44,338 3.26036 Full'::::::::::::$��;9��0;��:� Excess lev $73 $1,278 0.09397 State shared revenues Rate er ca Existin Full Li uor tax $3.30 $33.00 $330.00 Li uor Board rofits $5.29 $52.90 $529.00 Fuel tax- roads $14.45 $144.50 $1,445.00 , Fuel tax-arterials $6.76 $67.60 $676.00 MVET $0.00 $0.00 Cam er excise $0.00 $0.00 Criminal 'ustice $0.91 $9.10 $91.00 Total $307.10 $3,071.00 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existin Full Real estate excise* $54.69 $546.90 $5,469.00 Utilit tax** $133.00 $532.00 $5,320.00 Fines &forteits* $17.13 $171.30 $1,713.00 Total $1,250.20 $12,502.00 * Per capita , ** Per housing unit- based on $2,220 annual utility billing :��;::::;:::::?:?:;:';::;;; Total ongoing costs �� Per ca ita Existin Full Existing::::::::::::::::$4;�:3�:s�:3: Contracted Services Full::::;��::�;s;��3;�55;0�� Alcohol $0.23 $2.27 $22.70 Public Defender $3.13 $31.34 $313.40 Jail $7.19 $71.92 $719.20 Subtotal $105.53 $1,055.30 Court/le al/admin. $50.96 $509.60 $5,096.00 Parks maintenance* $14.90 $149.00 $1,490.00 Police $270.00 $2,700.00 $27,000.00 Road maintenance** $0.00 $1,715 Fire**'` $1.25 $970.00 $16,998.75 Total $4,434.13 $53,355.05 * See Sheet Parks FIA *� See Sheet Roads FIA *'`* Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact Existing:�:::::;::::::�::::�3t�f;79 Fu I I::::::�:�`�':::::$&;�5�;59 :Q�s��il�i�:costs;: Parks acquisition &development (from Sheet Parks FIA): $23,442.00 �� Other one-time costs: $0.00 Total one-time costs: ;:;;;:;;;:;�;��3;�4�:�0� S :- � PARKS ACQUISTION AND MAINTENANCE COST CALCULATION SHEI Needs: FALK ANNEXATION Acquisition of land for new neighborhood&community park Development of new neighborhood&community parks Maintenance of neighborhood&community parks Assumptions: $60,000 per acre for land acquistion $125,000 per acre for development(both neighborhood&community parks) $6,000 per acre to maintain neighborhood parks $7;000 per acre to maintain community parks 1.2 acres/1,000 for neighborhood park(LOS in Comprehensive Park Plan) 1.1 acres/1,000 for community park(LOS in Comprehensive Park Flan) 100 population after 10 years (projected growth) 40 housing units after 10 years (projected growth) $530.76 per single family unit mitigation fees 40 New single family units Per capita annual and one-time costs: One-time Costs: Acquisition: Neighborhood: 1 * 1.2/1000"$60,000= $72.00 Community: 1 ` 1.1/1000*$60,000= $66.00 Development: Neighborhood: 1 * 1.2/1,000*$125,000= $150.00 Community: 1 * 1.1/1,000*$125,000= $137.50 Total one-time costs: $425.50 � Mitigation fees: New units'` $530.76= $21,230.40 Acquisition &development costs minus mitigation fees: $21,319.60 Ongoing costs : (1 * 12/1,000`$6,000)+ (1 * 1.1/1,000''$7,000) _ $14.90 (park maintenance) , > � RELEVANT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES Policy LU-378. The City should encourage annexation of all territory within its Potential Annexation area, as depicted on the City's adopted land use map. Policy LU-379. Encourage annexation where the availability of infrastructure and services allow for the development of urban densities. Renton should be the primary service provider of urban infrastructure and services in the resultant area provided that the City can offer such services in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Policy LU-383. Encourage annexations of areas in which the City of Renton should logically be the primary provider of urban infrastructure and services. Policy LU-388. The proposed annexation boundary should be defined by the following characteristics: a. annexation of territory that is adj acent to the existing City limits; in general, the more land adj acent to the City the more favorable the annexation; b. inclusion of unincorporated islands and peninsulas; c. use of boundaries that are readily identifiable in the field, such as waterways, ridges,park property,roads/freeways, and railroads; d. inclusion/exclusion of an entire neighborhood,rather than dividing portions of the neighborhood between city and county jurisdictions; and e. natural corridors should be identified and included as greenbelts or community separators between the City and adjacent jurisdictions. I � .-�. _ — —y J�I � �_ i ` i I I � � ; � � i — O —— � I s O � � � i I — __ y ——I — I I I L_1 � �� I I �. I I I I � .. � ! I ❑ � I . . � il� — 1 � _ �. �I � 0 1200 2400 Falk Annexation Exhibit 1: Vicnity Map 1 : 14400 �ti�Y o,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � � Alex Pietsch,actingAdministrator �� Existing Corporate Boundary �,� G.Del Rosario Pro osed Annexation Bounda t�NTO 19 December 2002 P rY � ' � d I d a , . . �-��-��-i.�-. '� � � � _ __ _ __ ___ �� _ _ _ . � a � ;� --� __r o ___ _ _ _ __ � a a o � �'_�_ � p ' � �_ _ � � ' p � � SE 186th St � � 4 � � C� - - - � � � , 'Q � � ❑ °' � � � � o Q � � � `� � � � �� I - � Q ❑ � _ � � � a Q S� 188th St o � S ��(� � � � �O � � d � � O � Q i`�- � � Q � i q I � � a � � � Falk Annexation ° 3°° 6°° Exhibit 2: Existing Structures 1:3 600 .�Y w Existing Structure ' Gti�O,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Shategic Planning �i'�,� AlexPietsch,actiogAdminishator �� Existing Corporate Boundary �� G.Del Rosario ��NT� 19��zooz Proposed Annexation Boundary � r v / � � � M P�` , � , ,i x. / .. 1�..�Pl r i' � i �. \� \�4 �( i / ..��. .� . \ � �� x j � `� � '/,��-� '� -- � ��\ � �� /� � �= , _ y ` -� __ �� -�� v�\ '//% �� --' `..,. � �; t� �.� � ��` � "�\�� \ �` �� — �_� �� ,�� ,� ! I �°� �\�`\ \�� , - ,�. �% ^�� ,�,. • � �_�,`�"�. � � �\ � \ - _ � �� `�� j�,�� ,j i�;� � � � ��"'�,�'�.., ��\ �� -� � �� J I n �� ;; ,� ; ;,;��'� )��; ��, �\ \ \ ',�,� � ' � ,,� (,� �� :,�,� �..'�,� �,�-; ' � -'�,f�; � _ �`�\ ��, � �� . ; � i ' /��ll� \'�� , �"� '-- `�'��\ `�'�\\ � � �� ;'�'�'Ji�� -�� , � �. ; , � ( � �_�, , , ��,%'�„� ' \\ \\- u.„ �, , �� r H � / �j� \ / �\ \ \ \i ��I ! �� f --- a� .�^• �! �� I i � , \ � ��\�_, 'f�" $ ' � �.�;.-�:'�--'�-a— ��i`�,,�```!C � �� / � � \ S � � �� -��.- '�� -�: �. �--��- "-� �� J �� -��-=��✓..� -—j�'` �'\, ',i �1 r" ,' x =�-�� . �� -�-��'�,''�--,,--- -�J�-:�� ; / �� i � , � � �,'��`'\ � 1�`�,�x � �I I / \ i � � ' �,� ;/;� I -;��7 �� ! ' i �- _ _ � -�-: '�; � ,� i�� — i .v�, ��- ' ,' ' ---�;�- .� � �. � � ! � � ;� ��` '� ,�„ � . ,i••'� ' ,�,, ' "� „" i � y �� % , / "'� , .�.t � �� -,��-�� _ � / ( � I , � � �. �� . J / � % � � � 'I � �m�r _ _ \ � � � =� M . - . � �t � \��` � . / �� Ii� ' ��''� �� I��Ix �,11�1 ( %� " x� - i �i� � `� � �� i ��' � � i i�� __ � ------� — I � . ;! �� ,�� _ . — � ��" �� - � , � � �� ;�� , , , ' " � �..e � �x�_- �� ..,,�-�.�. , � l � � � � ,, � � , � � �l I� �I � � ,, � , �� x �� _ � � � �.. , � , � � ( �__ �" \ � / � D'r �v�u . �' I II I�M1M I �� .I� `� V � l ��` � —�— � K . %Yau � _ \�,_' �� _.. / ' '� � � xYr �WY 0� ' __ I ` M i y �� ' I 1 I� I / / ___ / � � � � IOl1 Jt� � I l x �,�>) 1 I',�,'�� , � ��_ �—��= ,� �� I I � ' � �' �" .�: � �.,� � ' �� E 8 E�F�__��,.. �� ' I � � � .,� ,�� _ �� - �"' , __ � � � � ��I ��//� ;,�� i% � x�"', � " �� i �m��ti � �. e �� _ -� � . � , � a , , x , _ n ; �� , . � . - �� ''r i , l „"' .,. " � �. �;�� ,, / � ; � �>; �� .�. � �� '` �1� � �.. � ;_:� -�- i ) ■ ' X � /i � - � j i,� � � ,.� , , � �C ' � � � . ` ��,�� M { � Y � LJ � 1 // � � /■ a� xrn � „ � I � � j �I�i , .L � _ � . . . _ , i i �' , ��I� \ �� , �� Q < ' � I,,., , '..' � _.; � ..- , � %`. x� .... � -r � � , \�I �I I;I ,_ \ `-' /'- � � x �� x� � � � � �� ,i� �� ,r ��.' SE 188th Sxt"'' �• , - � �� '; '�,�� , `�., � i ; ,.. , ,. � ��` � �„ . . � �``;�, �� m �``�� ,� � � l �, � „ ' � . � � � ; � . , � �,�,;,�� v �� I • • �, ,� �; � -.� ,_ �„; �` , , , �� : r... � � , � : �, � . �.�, � , �,,, ,;�� 1 ./ � , � �� ' � - , _w. , �.. , ,.�� .a,. .. ��, �� I � f p ( ; 1,, � .�.. � � � - • � . ��... < , � � � , �- ,.. � .-- �� ,. , �� ''� � , '� � � � � V - �...�� ; � � ,,�' \ r 1 ' -4r -� 1 - I , 1 t � ` \ . x�. ,�. m.. Fal k An nexation ° 3°° 6°° Exhibit 3: Topography 1:3,600 Gti�Y o,� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning 1 m Interval Contours � � r Alex Pietsch,ac[ing Administra[or �� Existing Corporate Boundary G.Del Rosario ��NTo 19December2002 - Proposed Annexation Boundary I I ' I � — -- . i � � i \ � ' I . I S Q I�� ,>�t _....,....-�.,.�....��_�-�.,.. i ---- - -_— r --— ----- ---- :-� __ _ _ __ � SE 186th St n� > � � � 0 SE 188th St S � I � Fal k An nexation ° 3°° 6°° Exhibit 4: Sensitive Areas _ . . _ pitcn 1:3,600 �ti��,� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �� ♦ ♦ AlexPietsch,actingAdministcator Existing Corporate Boundary ,p G.Del Rosario Proposed Annexation Boundary c�N.TO 19 December 2002 ; �� FALK ANNEXATION 5ITE INFORMATION SHEET 1. Location: The subject area is bounded on the north by South 47`�Street, on the west by existing city limits, on the east by the eastern edge of the 102°d Avenue SE right-of-way, and on the south by existing parcels in unincorporated King County. 2. Assessed Value: The assessed value at current development is $548,000. 3. Existing Land Uses: Elcisting development includes two single-family homes, one on 4.91 acres and the other on a 1.05 acre lot. 4. Existing zoning: King County zoning of the annexation area is R-1. This zone allows a base density of one unit per gross acre. 5. Natural Features: The subject site is generally flat with a gradual slope to the north. The southwestern portion of the site has steeper slopes as does the northeastern corner (Figure 3). 6. Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the annexation site as Residential Single Family which either R-8 or RMH zoning. R-8 allows a base density of eight units per net acre and RMH zoning is for manufactured housing developments. Whereas King County's Comprehensive Plan currently designates the subject area Greenbelt/Urban Separator with R-1, Residential one DU per acre zoning, efforts are underway in the County to change this designation to Urban Residential4-12 du/acre. 7. Public Services: No impediments to service delivery or unusual costs were noted by responding departments and divisions. Water Utility: The subject area is within the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District service area. By agreement under the East King County Coordinated Water System Plan, Soos Creek Water and Sewer Utility is the designated service provider for this area. � In addition the staff note that a certification of water availability from the District will be required prior to the issuance of development permits within the subject area, following its annexation to the City. Hydrant flow test and hydraulic analysis of the District's system will also be required for new development in the annexed area. The District must provide adequate water supply and pressure for new development within the City and must meet Renton's standards for fire protection and domestic water service. . Sewers: The area currently is not served by sewer. The annexation area is located within the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District service area. Sewers could be extended either by developer extension or local improvement district. Parks: There are two park facilities within three fourths of a mile of the annexarion area. One is Springbrook Park, located within the City and the other is the Cleveland Park site (undeveloped) and outside of the Ciry near SE 196�'Street and Talbot Road South. Fire: The area is currently served by Fire District No. 40. Upon annexation the City will be the service provider for this area. Public Works Maintenance: Maintenance staff has noted no infrastructure issues at the current level of development. Surface Water: Surface Water Utility staff note that any new construction that would occur as a result of this proposed annexation should be required to comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual, Level 2 Flow Control Storm Water and Water Quality Standards. An inventory of existing drainage infrastructure within the proposed annexation area will also need to be conducted to better assess the financial impact of the proposed annexation to the City. a� : ��.� � FALK ANNEXATIOT; � IN COUNTY S � ESSOR K R,6'A/TON ORD .�268 z,.�.,k - . - � � �� .,,,,..�:�;,..._:.., , "'�,�.;r'. .. �.", .. ... ""� � � .,�"-`,R �4 :s's; �s-'itik:.'+.e' . �:;'S�'JY''�'sr.. .. . . .a, `�: . �G3�:07� o'3e_�: a,�;-_�.r.. $ :a'.: . .... s n �� h':. 'y� � . ':i �; �� Y' ` .. �� e !I'N� . •1 '}'� . �. � ,�• O f�l�f� �.I.W�1.1�, S1'V�, � �'' � . ��' �� : #�-� �� t � , . � � �9��. 22 f� � a.o3a � �h �.r' �3c.-�G � _ �'_� qTR T R ;�;: — � '..:` �a �� }�1Y1( I,-I.YVq. ��l�(� Oy R� _ .\i,_�r° `�-��A�° �..._,. IJ 7,� '� /- . � ... . N: . _ � 0 96 ��:�� .. . :.- a... �.�: .-:�,-4� �-::�;-:��::�� _ �'�� . .. ..,-•.>_:�.:,:>::.:�:�, ,-�,��. :;�:A`:��.;��'w ,�;:�: - ;��;�;�:.-...<. ,_��.. '�� B/5 -.:",;�. �.. �:;�� :�:;�=.:_ r�,�:�=�; �� 1�`�'` ,�--: _ .�; �„ L�J• `2 B - _.._.� _. . 23o s' g.3 � � �.�06 co t> � �,�,a J ' ��c. n � � u 1�. . � i�'v Q ;�� ; _ - o rt�� TR � � ' ��G n O � $�� t ' .�6 — 30� 340 �y a� N _ _ -- SE ,.3g � °TRA 6� RG� � ,��G � Qi �NaPM' : . I 2• ica n ;� 7/ �_ ,l�so r _ 90� �'3�� NI I V� �6�0] . n� • I j 00 (n – �3G�6 � : `t' — li . 1 ':. �• -44 . . � �� . 0 �I � �4 N ^ �i �5.� t � � � � NGPE � \ . �5f�c. � �j � TR.�a 2,� i . Q 97 _�� ` �ob�o�v� � 6�G.3/ :I i�� R� 2G/ -�G .3/ � 29/��, n b - . q�LD�a� � � /4 l,v � � ��A .��ba� m�' �T-'` .� � �1 . . � ` _ �h AG qy I � a.��°�3'`��3A 1°° `° I , n � i i '�o��.y .� ,s �d,� � � ,, � CITY OF RE1o1TON �0�2 �20p2 - ' �; ECONOlVIIC DEVELOPMENT � '''''`��E3qR�, � NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STItATEGIC PLANNING FR&�=O�T�s � MEMORANDUM �� DATE: November 26, 2002 � TO: Larry Warren,Ci/ty Attorney ��l✓ FROM: Rebecca Lind,Planning Manager SUBJECT: Resolutions for the Proposed Falk Annexation City Council on November 18, 2002 concurred with the staff recommendation to consider election annexations for the Falk and Bales sites and authorized arranging annexation elections for both sites. In order to get this process started we will need resolutions for annexation by election for these two new sites. We are therefore requesting that your office go ahead and prepare the Resolution for Annexation by Election of the Falk Site. Attached please find copies of the legals and vicinity maps for this annexation site. If you have any questions please contact Don Erickson, project manager for these two latest election annexations. Don can be reached at 425-430-6581. Thank you. Attachments (3) cc: Don Erickson H:�EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Bales\Bales Resolution Request.doc\d � �- Q� ��rn : � ' � `�'�5�d�-� . . .. � � � � � �� r` � . � � � a , � . � . � � � � - . r �� ' � r; . � . � � � � ; � z� � 2 . . , 2 . Z : a�n . �� D 'o � . ��'�j p��S��n n��jeGf< n � .. _ . � fe . . . : r`Uer��/�o L'r`f� Cle�! �Jdnd �el . . . ��-��-�� s� � �� : . � ��r �� s-� . � � . � . � � °��05� � � � � . . . . �� . . � . . . ,. � � ��--- N�V�f,�� f�� .,��.,>3��T�..•..�� {��i� � � ��Q� CIrI'Y �� R�I�1�'�1'� EC�NOIl�IC I�E'(I�;I.,OPIVIEIVT ��°�� NEIG�IBOI�I�OOI3S , A1�1I) ST1��EGIC PLAI�II<tI�dG Ii�i E NF()IZ A I�1 Y��.1.1 IVI D.yTE: November l 8, 2002 �fl��' .d"',s��,�� TO: Toni Nelson, President �� City Council Members i '' � �� 14cCEltl�p VIA: IVlayor 7esse Tanner ��'c�-cR;C,�OF�� FRONI: Sue Carlson,Administrator �,/��v Economic Development,Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson (6581) SUBJECT: Falk Annexation Petition Request for an Annexation Election ISSUE: • Should the Council support and initiate an election for the±6.43 Falk Annexation site. RECOMMENDATION: • Refer this item to the Administration for further identification of issues and processing. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The applicant, Steve Beck, applied for annexation of the subject site in January of this year, having submitted a 10% Notice of Intent Petition to Annex the current 6.43-acre site and an additiona17.23- acres abutting it to the south. The Council fixed March 18, 2002 for a public meeting on the request but the City stopped work on this annexation because of the State Supreme Court's March 14, 2002 decision invalidating the petition method. Since the only remaining method for annexation within the State of Washington is the "election method", the applicant has requested that consideration be given . _ to holding an election for the annexation of±6.43-acre portion of the former Falk annexation site. . � The site is located on the ridge above Springbrook Springs that overlooks the Valley Area of Renton. � The site abuts the southwest comer of the intersectio� of South 47"' Street, in Renton, and 102°a Avenue SE, in King County. This revised application has not yet been routed to City departments for their comment and input. CONCLUSION: Because of the previous work on the larger Falk Annexation and staff's familiarity with the site, staff recommends that consideration should be given to annexation of the revised Falk Annexation site through the election process. Such an election could not be held until late spring or early fall next year. Attachment cc: ]ay Covington Rebecca Lind H:\E�)NSP\C'ouncil\Issue Paoers-Asenda Bills-Ctte Reports�2002\Falk Annesation Request.doc\d r L , � � `'}�� '� L'`�� ;`�FM�q��`T'� Sk�. q ��1 l 3�;� rt � �!2 .x ��1 �"C�I/�l'7 �I�Y GL��('�CrFi�� -�- �� .�;�� . PETITION TO THE REI�ITOI�1 C�TY COUNCIL CA�,LIl�G FOR AIo1 ANNEXATION ELECTION Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the undersigned (the "Petitioner") hereby calls upon the City Council of the City of Renton, a Washington municipal corporation (the "City"), which is a code city, to authorize and arrange for an election to vote upon the annexation to the City of that certain portion of unincorporated King County, Washington the boundaries of which circumscribe the property that is legally-described on Exhibit A attached hereto and all existing street rights-of-way adjacent thereto (the "Proposed Falk Site Annexation Area"). A map of the Proposed Falk Site Annexation Area and sunounding properties is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Proposed Falk Site Annexation Area is contiguous to the City. � I am one of not more than Two registered voters currently residing within the Proposed Annexation Area. Sa�nature Name and Address Date of Si�nin� �1) � � � r�e-�L,A-�i.�hc�.ru`� f(-rS�-oa �-��s to� � sF —KPYI (,c,lA' � WARNTNG Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. -, , ` � � E I'�'�. '�'�3�E�'I'I"��P�T �,�GAI.��'�'IOI�T P�C�JL r�: STR 322305 T,�X LOT 22 n 1/z of N�I '/4 OF NW '/a �F SW '/ LESS �Q ROAD LESS IZ?W TO KING COUNTY PAI$�EI.�: STR 322305 TAX LOT 96 ]PP AGT 3990303091 h�iOBIL� I-�OME � 72 FT OF S %z OF NW %4 OF NVV1/4 OF SW 1/4. _'—__._j " ---r i ' I �l�� ' ' i� i"". ...... .. . • �__ . . � S 43 c�� RM—I —g R-�o ;---- y--=-:�--�!.�_��_^:, _ � st � � : . C❑CP) ^ � , �— - r � � � • � � : _., R-1 i ��, , `�` � � , , , � ; I ; : ---i � �� ,.J— �:,ilc;��:..__� P� �.)� , `.`�j �J�G' — , `f e�{--;';;`;�:;� =i � co�P� 1 _ ' '�� y � ' �_�: 45 t , --r---- -_; ,,` �,..:i ❑�P� co�P> ca C�C P) -�\` =;�'� r- �`,�-� �- ', i ; �_ I i ..1—�, R — ------�-------� �_ ----�--!==� � , � yy r -�� . �� F'mi+,�'+;,k. ��. & �. 3� E�;�� l��X��`i ��y��a"`��=;";�'y.` n.�� 9�-�.�r��e�y`��y ^�� . X'T�h�S�f-~ � ' � �.' i .,l �/ :�,�'.st��,��.� _ i � s..a",k?,`�"L•3.yf•, d(i' -- ;:,»�..r�.,;;:...�„�,. .._.�.�, ��--,—;- -- - - ... . ��;:��-��;�<�:.s�� I � � ; ; -� --f--,--- --;;_.. , _:,:. . R 14 � ' ----� _ � G� �„ , LL� — ?\�L'; ;� _J �� i � � I 1 �\ i --'�=---- : :._; � �-`T-- . -+� .��-- O _ W - -� `' -----------�--....- � �.;_. _ �- R_1 � �, -� : r--- - .. : .: R 14 � � _� � �� --r-�_ �.�-----� � � th �� ` ^ -��--��;: ;---- ..; __L-' `.J� i'i�_ 'I I I_ . • . � R-1 i -�---��--;�� --� i � i �, � � �o osed �a� k A� nexation S ��e o 60� �2�0 ► � �- -� ;: �,ti�Y o,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � : 72 Q� � ♦O4 Sue Cazlson,Administratoc : . y G.Del Rosario ' � �� .r0$ 18November2002 �� f��re�,� . � EXHIBIT 13 to PETIT�ION -a�.;�,��!t� „=��:�..:;.,�;"� f�2 tl�q@�4��m r l�I�`;1LY,Y]L�1="..�u".�f 3 � zHIa xAP� ��,�,,. L�.��Y!x_�:��:�..,�,;.� � ,,�� K I N G CO U N T Y A S S E S S O R ��;._;,�- 4C 9HOH LR:UtdT_e2l.;::�iELir9 0�-�� - - ��-23�� pi , — - N. ai-oa. cnzw t.p�• ?.b ' az�,.e ' � 31 + q uT � 953 �•�; € �0\��60 ��'- 2 3� . $I� AEG� � � �� p� � �; - -s �. ..�,�� , - o �_ �; J � w � - . � q^ 50$g � �� tr 3 „� � �y1V1VLi1�1�lA�lY t3�lli � GSp � 1�7 z 1R' � y��,:�� '1IQ45 � K 'L�o z an°°�v 'c'''��. 'A�,�a� �° y< ��c. � S.[n.�f//.zia 4f•�( � 3� �9 ° °'`�s c' �° .v� �-'� ' u ne� �a�� tiR'� i�� S., za � oa+l4 �_ _ _ '�"' B � y � ,�° � _ - ,. .e,.,9 _ 4: � ,, T�R �zo ' �eu. �ea� n� �i�!6�� i,e�!'e'o v° � so, roO v ��,`° 40� nofP if�a°° '�oR' 'Nefp 'dP' � i� "'� awsn;rsi �' � 10 , � . y n a ¢3r sa u sa se s D�'�, � 5� �' - ��k SE I85TH PL.94T 3 Y �.!°P �e ` d�•� vo ?h c. ,t '� �< ,� az.v W� v.rs ss.e sr.� s7•'�t� b`Ef g�r�r',6 v� �iG/�� _ _ . ,} "�` 1 3 zi Yp� 1�4�7�9 3 A i��5�� 6 0 �7�� B Y �p�� ° � ,,'`� R o � q �P� w�iT'�rr R<y`p�P�� rP� °d°d� '`��` q''d�° .c �Q6 �� r a..e.c K Q -,. ,p e� a s �p `.1.'... .� F°<' \ �z. „f° e`. �'S � y �_ _ . �m V S��D�.. � nx b d� 4 ,�eu� ��. § � �e �� et ~��n ��n. �s.y 4 'r e � o,��e4 �a .,00y , y �-` ' icz P � .�A �,� �f"�e �,jo �q1'!'° �t, �,,e 'd � p Y�y, � � n " f �� f,� . • ^� !c 7 � .�'i �" a �, � a��° °�s° �e� e19? �,� � " �':°r�°X�, Z m _ ., _ --- �x:� � � se issni sr �wei��w m6 F p�' °: a.._ i w' " °" La"' � � �" `'`"��o x?� i``'„'`<,� * ; ; � �i � TR.0 F ssf cz� � r -+ rea,�• , $ � � V A� _ .7R8 � �i�3e 66g p� � N.7�ry �i� � �1i;_ x ♦ Z.� � L ` ,�. '� a �� nuti' cde �'B+°�- � � �� 066� eb�° 6q¢ �y/ e�� C� i _ e�csi ��. .J r"�� .� �1 �`'+.` 6 o[ao � Z�� e��. br �. '+zog ,� '� y z i .�i R ��A� �pi ^� q5� q7� � 5s�� 'Y Cau � ��ie Y �� C r�' F ` �A ,o�A �- ,—T..'- Y d � aa.d�,�° e�� aoa� �' •37"-�� e`�''�./'��,�o a g � F� 5pii d k ` y et � �' �F.R° Y yy : Y '=h�' 9 �_ LL ��%�,,,,��°� � �Z�"' i�''�i�° . � w� t�fij qe =d` �i�d i `eql�O� � �..e . O � pao O � �: ' 4�40 L 37 �� '�� .t .a<<i.s � t.. • 26 a.. e17° 5E� <. `F x, �, -� , . f. " ..�,..,.,,� a.,.., ' � � m.�. LP'� s�� a. �" �44 t4 v�CJ 611at l�� 38^��' �9�(�-�a 6'oy,�� 1 ;;s>r��d}6 ��,x ��v��1 e�� 'd' ,!P%�' e � � , 6� � ' yr y y ryoo ';� �.r .x.�s ;,, �� '�'°. ��g 0 � lat2�g e''��ot I , � ' �'yGr ��( � s2� S yq � 6y/ � 16go o��o wb o�. 1� �y s� en .C� d et� q3 ,"� y� � • � y �)��t�° S �� Z��•�,50 ��pM' S; I „ /.NV 2N� '�'d� � d� r•F, h �1"� yy -� -'•� � y �6 �` � 9Q��`� S Z +c„ 9�. dn° t oti Qv ao� . � �Y� '.�`•u:..��.ir: � ' ti ^ usPDE Ri�' �Y'& x u a H..a d qa''e0 9 Q' 0i� " '`••TK sai w � `6 SE IBTTH PL� # �SE 187TH PL x.�, y�1,0 } �.rc .t:�.°t-° �� 'tr �r.�c '�e �ce ,u� a u.�� ..n� `�v+. � ti' y; .' . , . `,y, 41 `rcu OC� o ,y� �� 31 � 9�. +� � �. KLSP_6nH307� � -a'*�� 4 98 � n E9 �. 4 p }�. c � �.? � i c�k = �1�..«.r4oszsoe�s,•-� <, �'� a� ��,e � .�s��!�� ypw-� �� J �* M L'� I IL .r`�r�f)� Y �yr�°� id S��df '16�jo �H , �f„�'�" � `e9�� c6.Y' ��° CVN � � �� .s.�rw.��..t.��..�r0 Q .�n-�n..�✓ r�.w � ° �e 1 �i.0 sx �� . 7� 131170' - •�{�"— es N -n.a[� � � to.. "a`n ,� �� 8 ses� �I ew'ewz s,K 7 � „„ '°' ' �.,• �SE188TH •,��-••� •••.•, _ C. 4j � i.ar�K�'�o d'�wr 4ims �S �nr e ��' r�i ia.r�� 2,., � + _rsu��-R��i�y q a �Y � roase a . ��t�ro�e � mm�x ': qti+ TrQ,.'A,�9 `O� , 4 .. v z' �,n,P•! �rg i �� , rs-rz' � zx ur.ie � u.a§.�s-Tis=+o+r�� mxr�t�� w� � : Lor��.'s+.0 � sy 2 ..*'tl`•°Q ,�� Dppa�'`'�°� ",p y K�a. .gBno�p s�'K' ..,... �� j0�9 0 �a _,�.�r SE. ;r�•c�r g hC4._� �yC� ��7�i �i��n 8 �Q g L� i• ' x+-srn� 53� 5 c� a e � �BC TM 5 IY'��Iy Wm_��(Y/ ��_�Ms�y�._ „ � Oe�� • ,;� c.u�o XL° LOTP �i LOr4 • '1°P r's pp}� �/ +� �. E � v 'v, h c I QO' ��^C n"� S� UWD �� `=.�s ��'+�` �a"d ! � — we.mrs/ C $ •°Cn w`" � ; 4,. P yw�`� ° °'t8''o' o^° cAa L . �(�� Y w'°`� j � a � .� � � E• r p ( �� y� � ` '8« � � ��'yp � � ' _ .. a ��. _ �' - ~� c r � a n y � .i e'a�sa 6� p �' H �� s.s.�n2 z�.a. � �O "} w{� p O4..�• j TR.A � lDT 60q' ��i w � L��\1' ��' ��>.�e iroi � f Y O a� Qj6 cr�y��'� t{� o� inr r Q � �' 7 �w� �� I p°r i ,\`,�� 'n } KCSP 87302B-7909/30 T .�I �,�5°� � ___�� fgl��L0` �� !`O } c, "': �� l� — ii �;+ ° 1LLF�N'O V^�'• a R_,.-i' �� KCSP2W024 1 �.��.aF � p y y n„ .�«r . *y �( u�l LOT 3 �e_0708 TZ� �� µ„c t�� f1`' +� � .rt( ' ¢] ` �d ^ LOT / � 0 � �.d°4� � � LOTTi� � 1 m+ r',l q.Y �:x�+ ,�' E� � j � n' R ` °`' t -..r � "m ' w. ... 1` � ��-- � �o`�,e� t.or r �...... > n..,;� :•,•' I •_ -�- _ i k � �1'",� �� Nep p� ��Ar..e � .,�+nr.�_L �..y.� M� �"�1 d .1-i � I,�� 'f` � N,f, t �.ceA'Y �� s E�� l,xe a � r�;a' � LOT 2 �f��p I .• - ii �� r° ^ �,1� �°'.:*_� " ' TR.X� �...� . r�..sr. i .�if-w w ro 'Jo lj yl�� . � . . ly ��Ta. em✓ - iao.e� ` .n.+� S 1 SE'p"�"I T��5T. L .190TH , .i. �� \FL rw.W' . I � ,c-_ ,u r n...� . �.H �r.ro .s ... .o.n _. . ase .� m m. �. C $ November 18,2002 Renton City Council Minutes � Page 440 85-011,Addendum 5); Lane Hangar Condo (LAG-99-003,Addendum 1); and NW Seaplanes,Inc. (LAG-91-005,Addendum 7). Council concur. Utility: Public Works Fees Utility Systems Division submitted proposed increases to eleven public works fees pertaining to water meter installation, sewer and storm water construction permits, and release of easements. Refer to Utilities Committee. Utility: Kennydale Sewer Infill Wastewater Utility Division recommended authorization to transfer$300,000 Project,Fund Transfer from Wastewater accounts to the Sanitary Sewer Main Extension Account No. 45000 to cover unanticipated costs as part of the Kennydale Sewer Infill Phase I project. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL,APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. COItRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Roderick Williams, 11919 Renton Ave. S., Citizen Comment: Williams— Seattle, 98178,requesting connection to City sewer service for three parcels Sewer Connection Request for located outside the City limits in the vicinity of 80th Ave. S. and S. 130th St. Property Outside City Limits MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COiJNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Added Petition submitted by Steven A.Beck,4735 NE 4th St.,Renton, 98059, Citizen Comment: Beck- requesting the City authorize and arrange an annexation election for the Bales Bales Annexation, SE 128th St Annexation; 8.5 acres along the eastern limits of the City at SE 128th St. and 155th Ave. SE, if extended. The petition is signed by Irvin Leifer, 15325 SE 128th St.,Renton, 98059, one of four residents residing within the proposed annexation area. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COLINCIL REFER THIS PETITION TO THE ADMIl�IISTRATION. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Beck-Falk Petition submitted by Steven A.Beck,4735 NE 4th St.,Renton, 98059, Annexation, S 47th St requesting the City authorize and arrange an annexation election for the Falk Annexation; 6.43 acres abutting the southwest corner of the intersection of S. ��2- I 1� 47th St.,in Renton, and 102nd Ave. SE, in King County. The petition is signed by Janet L. Abubakar, 18415 102nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, one of two residents residing within the proposed annexation area. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCII.,REFER THIS PETITION TO THE ADMIl�IISTRATION. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Flannin��Develo�pment report regarding the proposed Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations City Committee Code amendments. The Committee reviewed the matter and associated issue Planning: Urban Center paper on November 7,2002. The Committee recommended that a public Design Overlay Regulations, hearing be set on December 2,2002,to consider the matter, and an ordinance Application to Small Multi- be drafted for consideration at that time. MOVED BY KEOLKER- Family Projects WHEELER, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Briere presented a report regarding the aquifer Utility: Aquifer Protection protection City Code amendments. The Committee recommended that a public Code Amendments hearing be set on December 2, 2002,to consider the proposed amendments to ��.,��c.� the City's aquifer protection regulations. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. _. _ ___. ____.. _- -- _ Karen Codiga-03-18-02.doc_ _.._ _.._ ..__ ' , . _. _, ... ._ _.. .�. ._. . __ _ _ .... _. .._ .. _. - - -- --_ . ...__._-Page 1 -- �. March 18,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 1 RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting March 18,2002 Council Chambers Monday,7:30 p.m. M I 1V U T E S Renton City Hall CALI,TO OIZDER Mayor Jesse Tanner led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the - meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROI.L CALL OF TONI NELSON,Council President;DAN CLAWSON;KATHY KEOLKER- CO�JNCILMEIVIBERS WHEELER;TERRI BRIERE;KING PARKER;DON PERSSON;RANDY CORMAN. CITY STAFF IN JESSE TANNER,Mayor;JAY COVINGTON,Chief Administrative Officer; ATTENDANCE ZANETTA FONTES,Assistant City Attorney;BONNIE WALTON,City Clerk;GREGG ZIMMERMAN,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator;JIM SHEPHERD,Community Services Administrator;SYLVIA ALLEN,Recreation Director;GERALD RERECICH,Recreation Manager; MIKE WEBBY,Human Resources Administrator;SLTE CARLSON,Economic Development Administrator;ABDOUL GAFOUR,Water Utility Supervisor; KAREN BERGSVIK,Human Services Manager;DEREK TODD,Assistant to the CAO;COMMANDER CURTIS SMALLING,Police Department. SPECIAL PRE3ENTATION Human Services Manager Karen Bergsvik introduced Laura Brock,the newest Human Services:Human member of the Human Services Advisory Committee and stated that another Services Advisory Member new member,Robin Jones,could not be present for her introduction. Ms. Introduction,Laura Brock& Bergsvik described Ms.Brock's qualifications,saying that she is looking Robin Jones forward to wo ' '. l�e PUBLIC 7'IN � Ma,<c�4 .a ��anuour�� e�Ia�ion o�the��i. . ,��i _r�b ;di�a�g.�i�� ' �p��,:��.�a'cs��: �ai�k,'S�7tli.=t& 10 c e i�aa��a ta /��a�� hcar tl2e��c�pc�sed��t� �.nnexatian d1�e ' ers Ave S to �;r�c;v� � rer �a d ' ion w ic inva idates ffie petition method of ��'o �. __' � ---� Responding to Councilman Clawson's inquiry regarding the decision,Mayor Tanner explained that the cities of Moses Lake and Yakima challenged the validity of the petition method for annexations,claiming it gave inordinate influence to property owners. He noted that the election method of annexation has been left in place. (See Administrative Report for additional information regarding this subject.) � � �� P , ..� �� u�.�` � r; � � ;; AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION � � E— ��-°1 — a� Barbara Alther, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the �``�� SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL CITY OF�RENTOIv (� NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING �""� �� 600 S.Washington Avenue,Kent,Washington 98032 : RENTON CITY CO�UNCIL . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of , the Renton City Council has fixed the general publication and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of i 8th day of March, 2002, at 7:30 p.m.as the date and time for a public publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a daily meeting to be held in the seventh newspaper in Kent, King County,Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a � floor Council Chambers of Renton legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. City Hall, 1055 S. Grady Way, � The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County Journal (and Renton, f98055, to consider the not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers during the below � � following: 10% Notice of Intent Petition to stated period. The annexed notice, a i Annex for an approximately 13.66 � acre site bounded on the north by. Intent Annex South 47th Street, on the west by existing city limits, on the east by as published on: 3/8/02 the eastern edge of the 102nd Avenue SE right-of-way, and on The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$63.38, charged to the south by existing parcels in Acct. No. 8050640. uni�,corporated King County. • e'"(Petitioner:Falk)�, The cost above includes a$6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. �"A+�'��eres�ed parties are invited to attend the public meeting and present written or oral comments Legal Number 10109 ! regarding the proposal. City Hall is � � fully accessible, and interpretive services for the hearing impaired will Legal C erk, South County Journal , be provided upon prior notice. Call 430-6510 for additional information. - Bonnie-I..Walton_ Subscribed and sworn before me on this�a of,��'2002 ', City Clerk y Published in the South County � ��ya090 O B O 8 BpgB� ' Journal March 8,2002. 101 pg ,; `0iO � r�, F BBBp� c + , 0\ a��G.,......... �� oi 000`��:••'t�S,r�s��p�F%�Pjti°;;�/�oBp Notary Public of the State of Wash gton � � ~ °�� , � residin m Renton o �t:'c� �'•.c' 9. o�: :�o�^';; : �'a King County,Washington m �p_e � ��p(i:til' \,�,�t J�'�� . � � . PO.��,•,. a , � . •� � ooe09��JlJ3�7 l4��'1''�a''� \ - O , � � 5� Q �y 0 7 � � �� ' March 4,2002 Renton City Council Minutes Page 76 standards covering administration, maintenance,programming,natural resource management,planning, marketing, community relations,risk management, fiscal control,personnel policies, safety and security, research, and evaluation. � Studio East presents StoryBook Theater's The Ugly Duckling at Carco Theater on Saturday,March 9th, 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m., and on Sunday, March lOth, 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 NE l lth Pl., Renton, 98056,reported that at a recent Citizen Comment: Evans— Highlands Community Association meeting at which a presentation was made Return of Recovered Property regarding crime prevention, a question arose concerning the return of stolen to Rightful Owners property to burglary victims. Mr.Evans inquired as to whether the Police Department returns recovered property to the rightful owners after a burglary case is resolved in court. Assuring Mr.Evans that every effort is made to return the stolen property, Mayor Tanner stated that he will ask the Police Chief to provide a report detailing the City's procedures for the return of recovered property to the rightful owners. Councilman Clawson and Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington encouraged citizens to take photos of and to etch their drivers license number on personal items in order to assist in the identification and recovery of the items in case they are stolen. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of February 25, 2002. Council concur. February 25,2002 CAG: 01-201,Downtown City Clerk reported bid opening on 2/21/2002 for CAG-01-201, Construction of Parking Garage Construction, Renton Municipal Downtown Parking Garage; eight bids; engineer's estimate E Kent Halvorson Const $8,420,715; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder,E. Kent Halvorson Construction, Inc., in the amount of$6,068,457. Council concur. Community Services: Gene Community Services Department requested approval to increase the Gene Coulon Park Boat Launch& Coulon Memorial Beach Park boat launch and parking fees. Refer to Parking Fees Increase Communit�Services Committee. Court Case: Karen Dobson, Court case(Petition for Writ of Review)filed in King County Superior Court CRT-02-003 by Karen Jo Dobson, 3447 Lincoln Dr. NE,Renton, 98056,requesting review of the Renton City Council's final decision approving the St. Claire Preliminary Plat and rezone (PP-01-O55) on 12/21/2001, and approving the conjoined rezone Ordinance 4952, adopted 1/28/2002(effective 2/6/2002). Refer to City Attornev and Insurance Services. Annexation: Falk, S 47th St& Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Smithers Ave S recommended a public meeting be set on 3/18/2002 to consider the 10%Notice LU� �.Z "O� � of Intent to Annex Petition for the proposed Falk Annexation; approximately 13.66 acres located at the City limits south of S. 47th St. and approximately 300 feet east of Smithers Ave. S., east to 102nd Ave. SE. Council concur. Finance: 2002 Carry Forward Finance and Information Services Department requested approval of the 2002 Budget Adjustments carry forward ordinance in the amount of$4,176,313, which appropriates funds from fund balance, increases expenditures in various funds and departments, and increases and adjusts the 2002 Budget. Refer to Finance Committee. �� ` ."� � ITY OF RENTON � 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Printed: 02-21-2002 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Perr�it#: LUA01-084 Payment Made: 02/21/2002 04:00 PM Receipt Number: R0200960 Total Payment: 25.50 Payee: cam�rest development Current Payment Made to the Foilowing Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount ------ ----------------'-- ------------------------------ ---------------- 3955 000.05.519. 90.42.1 Postage 25.50 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount ---------- -------- --------------------------- --------------- Payment Check 9677 25.50 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due ------ ------------------ ------------------------------ --------------- 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 3955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5006 000.345.81. 00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees .00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review .00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat .00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD .00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees .00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks .00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone .00 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt .00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev .00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval .00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Special Permit Fees .00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees .00 5023 0 .00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee .00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend .00 5909 000.341. 60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies .00 5941 000.341.50. 00.0000 Maps (Taxable) .00 5954 604.237.00. 00.0000 Special Deposits .00 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage .00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax .00 0 �l :� -' � � ' ♦ ' Real Estate Development , Inc . ■ I Date` 2/99/2002 Transm �ttal Number of pages including cover sheet TO: City of Renton FROM: CamWest Development ATTN: Don Erickson 9720 NE 12a`' PL, suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98034 . Sara Slatten Phone: Phone 425-825-9955 Fax Phone: . Fax Phone 425-825-9565 � ISubject Shamrock Property ' I REMARKS: _ Urgent For your review Reply ASAP Please Comment Don, � Enclosed is the check for$25.50 for the Shamrock meeting notice postage. Please let me know if you need anything else. Sincerely, �u� -ol- D�'y Sara Slatten t. , � ,.�..,.� _ _ . . ---�—�;.�,��. _.. . � " [.7 Securrt enhrsn .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . . .. . 1 . . e� d o c u rv e n 1. 5 c e G a c k r d e t a i!s.p CAMWEST DEVELOPIV�ENT,IPIIC " ,.��,: s72o NE 12orH PL sTE Yoo CJ677 KIRKLqIVp�Wq g8034 PAY < TO THE �_ � D^ �: m ORDER OF DATE �-- ol 98-845/1251 � �,z � 01 � � �s - C�1 ER BAIVK 1� � S� / � ��S� � Main Ot(ice_(425)586-5000 320-108th Ave.NE.,su�te�oo �O L L A R S 8 �°°°"" � Bellevue,Wq g80045734 ,,. �� a � ; FOR � � , ��;�,:�Jr.u��,�: _ u■0 0 9 6 7 7 uo i; L 2 5 l 0�4 5 0�; p ----_-___ __. ��, "�`��`�"`�''��,..-:��,�„_.,�,., __ � 3 0 L 1 2 6 n■ ' � ._ __._-------- _----._.__"� � ��.. �„�� ,��,��;�,,._ ��u,,�rr_______,�, :�_.,,:�-,- , � ' . - . , . , , .�:] \ City of f��lon Department of Planning/Building/Public�lorKs � ' EIVVIRONMENT.4L & DEVELOPIVIENT APPLICATiON REVIEW SkEET � REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:' �,,t , �y , Un COMMENTS DUE: 5:00 PM, FEBRUARY 22N , . �---� � APPLICATION NO: LUA��`�` ,A, R �C� DATE CIRCULA7ED: FEBRUARY 11,2002 h! � APPLICANT: NINA FALK PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON,AICP � N T �, � e� PROJECT TITLE: FALK ANNEXATION WORK ORDER NO: � y �;$ o LOCATION: S.47T"STREET& 102ND AVE SE Fc� � � 0 c ,�,r �''' _ SITE AREA: 13.66 ACRES BUILDIiVG AREA ross : N/A � � . � , � � SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed annexation and rezone of 13.66 acres north of Springbrook Springs Wai� ed frot4i . County's Fi-1 Zone to Renton's R-8 Zone. The site is accessed off of SE 192"d Street and overlooks the Valley Are�Rent oi� � s, A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probab/e More Environment Minor Major Inlormation Environment Minor Major Information lmpacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housin Air � Aesthetics Water Li hUGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans ortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ' ��l�'�E� EMC�tf� /+'�,��r�g��'e2"..�s � ��i, '�''✓$��°6�iE�"t;!t��!' �^� ��'�'•�I�C?��.°`��:C'�3��s'`�"�'�a.,��s>�"r'� �� r��Lrb.-�'._ �i{�t�'$..L`'�.�✓��?c�+� ��`�-� s Cr'�� v�£�:�w""�C_.��'>��:� T�'c�.� � S�BT.,a'�� w�e.""�'C'=i'r�&etGz��'C:� `tv 2 c�t.��'��-�'2 a� J"i�i�'��'�-��p� °�`,� �� U7��a�,'�� ''� c�-�5 ��. ��:tr-t'�-��t�r�'�.� : . �,-� ��-,��.��,�� - :��. 1�,��<,��r`t(��s�..� t�� $��:�-�"'�. ��f!o�.a�c� ��c��. �'�� 5�� `��0'�� e��s 3-wc� 5� f�-��.��lo��'� ��-�� C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS _� �b�.o�G� r��l`�Gt �c'? �� l�t�#` —�"1'r�'�°'�.�" I��6;dGl�k�-!':t�i.`j � ({roc��a�� i.e't�ce��.cL�A ct,�G4*�� s.d�"��''�. '�(+X�.'�.3A?�.+�',��'.��Zi�C'�?'�° �1�J��"t��7� ti,�� !°a 4i �OW'`i�t�a�,� t�`�" �o Ea.-�-�*l '�'��'� �4z.,�k � g� g� 4��-Lt,c� $��ti�dv� .5� `��+�L i�l�t ��l.G'- cd-s%i C2C'��=�'t a tr: '��i!" � .�-°.sS-"�l ��,"''-+'�,P�' ��:"7°�:�.�=��2'�� '`.�� '''M- � ��t��'�� 1�"-+= �I`��:, ��':�'�- t��7 ��(�F' ��+�..' ��y�k�i�� ;''�"� ��,. `�Y��:-'��.�v1.�� °� Y`1 't�`t,��1 �1��6'��i�'$�'�F�:�► We have reviewed th' applic ion with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or reas re�ad ition 1 infor 'on ' eeded to properly assess this proposal. , �:� , � `3 d � Signature of Director or zed epresentative Dat Routing.doc Rev.10/93 City of F�on Departmenf of Plannrng/Building/Public°�o�s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPL /CATION REV/EW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:S v �, COMMENTS DUE: S:OO PM, FEBRUi4RV 22ND, ZOOZ oZ-o I�) APPLICATION NO: LUA-02=6'1"8,A, R �C� DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 11, 2002 APPLICANT: NINA FALK PROJECT MANAGER: DON ERICKSON,AICP PROJECT TITLE: FALK ANNEXATION WORK ORDER NO: � G'� R c�ry 0 ��NT ry LOCAYIOfV: S.47T"STREET&102ND AVE SE ,4�' ° SITE AREA: 13.66 ACRES BUILDING AREA ross : N/A e � SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposed annexation and rezone of 13.66 acres north of Springbrook Springs Waie� d fro ing County's R-1 Zone to Renton's R-8 Zone. The site is accessed off of SE 192nd Street and overlooks the Valley Area�rSl��ton. O�y A. ENV/RONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probab/e Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major In(ormation Environment Minor Major Info�mation Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housin Air Aesthefics Water Li hUGfare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Trans ortation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Nistoric/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet �,�.�� /��✓` �T.�/a�5 /!� B. POLICY-REL,4TED COMMENTS '� s,��rl �k-/<3� `��-m�+�•fs j�r��.cld••T ''wt.l�,- �1.�/�`�>s C�f�-r��Ss . T� S2� �s c�� /� �'� �w��,• C:-i�s� S:�b- 5.��9n i.��'�;� j`� l�l�.��%t u-"�iz' -��! ( S.f�'y^3 Lv,z�,l�G.�-.e��-J cJl i..� t s `�^.(,,,f� -!� d-t...� c�..�e�., l►'1.,w��r.�s Z �� ;� .rr,� D��a z � G�,�� -/��v�� p� � / �/ � j H�-- isc�o�- l� 2e.�-O,.�j �^�!J��f f�iiQ �t L vLG^Q-°'�-a /�i ��c�.1./z�/ r� /�vvi�TT' �zc0�i/7�S ��/� / � c:7� �j,'L6�° , C. CODE-RELATED COMMEIVTS �/e� �v�:sh.��z:�r �-, �� n.c�e�wh .�v�-eti 8�1,.0 /� /�c��v�� i�lJ v�� ✓� �� i�c�s'w�27� L�v�� z. ��z✓ ��-�i �,�.,�, w�.�4� ��Lc/L 6ZG_!L� /� '-.,� G(J��Y �tJCa.r ��.-�o_, �r� y✓-��e'a.- c� �.`f�/,�,�-� (s�j�s10 , ��,f-�.�.�, 5� }.� �.r� � ;� �T�� r�-�-7�,�..e�0 �� kj/ � � ��/4�0�1s �7�J�� ,�c��y v��.s�af ��.��..e r �s��,.e r�v�.�r�,�, 'r�- !� �� `!.�'Q.�-e� �� f� �'-� i-�ti.-. ;G-.•�-/�<��1— i'L � �v,-F�.� . �..E.- C� yJ,r-e J� i��i��u-o�r%n1 -ta � d�� //,}ss �� c4-1.�. lp 7� � v � etinn� �.a,.� �...�e.�/ We have reviewed this application with particular attention fo those areas in w ich we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional i formation is needed to properly ass ss thi •rop sal �� / � �/�2/d?1 [ ignature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rauting.doc Rev.10/93 i , - � J -=, _ _. ' Df.=1��i�J,p,,;`_;�---,{ qN�lli�� - t,'�.,��r�l�! �� 2 �� Thursday,February 14,2002 City of Renton Development Planning 1055 South Grady Way � Renton, WA 98055 Dear Planning Committee, Please find enclosed my completed form, asking that I receive current updates on the Falk Annexation and Rezone, file number LUA-02-019, A, R;. I would like to state my approval of this Annexation and Rezone and believe this is a responsible use of urban land. Respectfully, � � �� Reid McNair 18525 102nd Ave. S.E. Renton, WA 98055 425-235-2856 _ � �� o z._-- - - � �. _ Received Notice of Application for project number/name LUA- 02-U�y,A,�;F'A1�K �11e1��A�1(�l�T . �VVe would like answers to the following questions. . 1. There are 13.66 acres of land for annexation, five belong to the Falk family. Why is it called the Falk annexation? They are not representing us. We are not in favor of annexation. These are our concerns and questions. 2. If property is rezoned from R-1 to R-8, what happens to existing trees? 3:- What is the city of Renton's procedure for handling wetlands? We have wetlands on our property including a pond & peat bog. The pond is on our property and the property north of us. 4. Is any consideration given to the animals & birds that use this property?. We often see, possom, raccoon, deer, hawks, owl,& many other birds. I count birds for the State of Wa. & could , give you a list if needed. S.How do you plan to handle additional traffic resulting from eight homes per acre? These are a few of our concerns. Please put them on record. Thankyou, Joe & Martha MacKenzie 18533 102nd. Ave Se. - Renton, WA. 98055 1 - ,.__ ,) � __ / � 1� J-�L-�:. ��.c._. �� ,� � DEVELOPNiENT PLqf�NING . CITY CF i�E��l'ON . .. , , .. . ' , �� .� � �Q�� i��:�'�'��;h,� . , 4ii�;yµ�' `� _ .� ' � CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORI300D5, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPART1VIEl�TT MEMOI� ANDUM DATE: February 12, 2002 TO: Toni Nelson, President City Council Members VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Sue Carlson, Administrator J� Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson, Ext. 6581 SUBJECT: Falk Annexation 10% Notice of Intent ISSUE: The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intent to annex about 13.66 acres to the City of Renton by direct petition (see Figure 1). State law requires that the Council hold a Public Meeting with annexation proponents to decide whether to accept, reject or geographically modify the proposal. The Council also decides whether to require the assumption of bonded indebtedness and whether to require the simultaneous adoption of zoning. RECOMMENDATION: • Authorize the circulation of the 60% Petition to Annex for the proposed area; • Require the adoption of City zoning on the property consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and, • Require that property owners assume a proportional share of the City's bonded indebtedness. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: 1. Location: The subject area is bounded on the north by South 47`'' Street, on the west by existing city limits, on the east by the eastern edge of the 102°d Avenue SE right-of-way, and on the south by existing parcels in unincorporated King County. 2. Assessed Value: The assessed value at current development is $1,448,000. 3. Existing Land Uses: Existing development includes seven single-family homes on medium to large lots (Figure 2). G-' + � , n • February 26, 2002 Page 2 4. Existing zoning: King County zoning of the annexation area is R-1. This zone allows a base density of one unit per gross acre. 5. Natural Features: The subject site generally flat with a gradual slope to the north. The southwestern portion of the site has steeper slopes as does the northeastern corner (Figure 3). 6. Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the annexation site as Residential Single Family which either R-8 or RMH zoning. R-8 allows a base density of eight units per net acre and RMH zoning is for manufactured housing developments. It is likely that staff will recommend R-8 zoning for this annexation if the Council authorizes circulation of the 60% Petition to Annex and the applicants are successful in obtaining the signatures of property owners representing 60% of the area's assessed value. King County's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject area Greenbelt/Urban Separator and has zoned it R-1, Residential one DU per acre. 7. Public Services: No impediments to service delivery or unusual costs were noted by responding departments and divisions. Water Utility: The subject area is within the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District service area. By agreement under the East King County Coordinated Water System Plan, Soos Creek Water and Sewer Utility is the designated service provider for this area. A certification of water availability from the District will be required prior to the issuance of development permits within the subject area, following its annexation to the City. Hydrant flow test and hydraulic analysis of the District's system will also be required for new development in the annexed area. The District must provide adequate water supply and pressure for new development within the City and must meet Renton's standards for fire protection and domestic water service. Sewers: The area currently is not served by sewer. The annexation area is located within the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District service area. Sewers could be extended either by developer extension or local improvement district. Parks: There are two park facilities within three fourths of a mile of the annexation area. One is Springbrook Park, located within the City and the other is the Cleveland Park site (undeveloped) and outside of the City near SE 196`''Street and Talbot Road South. Fire: The area is currently served by Fire District No. 40. Upon annexation the City will be the service provider for this area. Public Works Maintenance: Maintenance staff have noted no infrastructure issues at the current level of development. Surface Water: Surface Water Utility staff note that any new construction that would occur as a result of this proposed annexation should be required to comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual, Leve12 Flow Control Storm Water and Water Quality Standards. An inventory of existing drainage infrastructure within the proposed annexation area will also need to be conducted to better assess the financial impact of the proposed annexation to the City. ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION: (Pursuant to City Council Resolution 2429) 10%Issue Paper#2.doc a _ a ♦ , ' � � February 26, 2002 Page 3 Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The annexation policies generally support the proposed annexation. The subject annexation site is located within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and is within an area seeing increased development pressure (Policies LU-378 and LU-379). Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for this area is Residential Single Family which allows up to 8 dwelling units per net acre. Under King County's Comprehensive Plan land use designation and zoning the area is unlikely to achieve urban densities. It is currently designated "Greenbelt/Urban Separator" and zoned for one dwelling unit per acre. The City and the County have been in discussions about how to resolve this disparity. It is anticipated that this issue will be resolved before the annexation is completed and City zoning is applied. Renton is the logical service provider of most urban services and infrastructure for this area(Policy LU- 383). Policy LU-388 states that in general,the greater the contiguity with the city limits, the more favorable the annexation. The proposed annexation is adjacent to the city limits along 50% of its perimeter. Policy LU-388 states that annexation boundaries should be"readily identifiable in the field". The proposal follows lot lines along its northern and eastern boundaries and existing parcels on its western and southern boundaries. There are no alternative boundaries to the south that would be more consistent with this policy, without substantially increasing the size of the proposed annexation. Consistency with the Boundary Review Board Objectives: (from RCW 36.93.180) a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities; The proposed annexation would cause no disruption to the larger community. b. Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours; The proposed annexation follows lot lines on two sides, city boundaries on two sides, and streets on two sides. No alternative physical boundaries exist in the vicinity. c. Creation and preservation of logical service areas; With the exception of water and sewer service provided by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, the city is capable of providing all urban services to the proposed annexation area. The City currently serves the area north of South 49`''Street and west of the proposed annexation. d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries; The proposed annexation has regular boundaries and is rectangular in shape. e. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas; Not applicable. f. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts; Not applicable. g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries; 10%Issue Paper#2.doc d . . ' V� . � i � �-�, February 26, 2002 Page 4 Neither the existing City boundary nor the proposed new boundaries are impractical. h. Incorporation as cities or town or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; This area is designated for urban development in that it is located within King County's Urban Growth Boundary. i. Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. No portions of the proposed Falk Annexation area are rural or designated for long term productive agricultural use in the King County Comprehensive Plan. As noted above, the King County Comprehensive Plan currently designates this area as Greenbelt/Urban Separator. CONCLUSION: The proposal is generally consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies related to annexations and Boundary Review Board objectives for annexation. No impediments to the provision of City services to the area have been identified at this early stage. Discussions are underway with King County regarding their designation of the annexation area and area to the south as Greenbelt/Urban Separator. A full fiscal analysis will be conducted following receipt of a certified 60% Petition to Annex, if it is Council's intent that this proposed annexation should proceed. Attachments cc: Gregg Zimmerman Bonnie Walton,Ciry Clerk 10%Issue Paper#2.doc � • �`� i� "'`-- j — � - , ; , Uti'SY � � , + .n,�� '�` � I ��NT�$ � NOTICE OF App��CATION A Master qpppcatlon has been filetl antl acceptetl with the Development Servlces Divislon p(the Clty of penton. The following 6rie11y describes the epplication antl tha necessary public qpp�o�als. � PROJECT NUMBEq/NAME: 'LUA•02•01g,p,q�pq�K qNNEXAiION(70%Notice uf��te��g RE20NE PROJEC7 DESCRIp710N; I East qenton Plateau(Soos Creek Area). The proposed annexalion is wifhin Renton's potential annexation area,and is I Proposal woultl initiate annexation to Ihe City of Renlon oi 73.66 acres on the anna�xation,antl two�public�hea Ings on the change in zoning tro'm King C unt s R- � No tlevelopment is proposetl as part of Ihe requesf for annexation. Public meeting antl a public hearing on the � Y 1 Zone to City of Renton's R•8 Zone. PROJECTLOCAiION: ' eastem etlge of the 102'"qvenue SE right ohways t borde s�he City of qe^jorn alond�p extentlatl.The site is approximately 685'b Streel and on Ihe east by the I y 855'. 9 what would be 99"'Avenua SE,i/ � PUBLIC APPROVqLS: Mnexatlon&Rezone - ; , De ebpment�7 55 South Gretllic�n must be su6mittetl in writing to Don i about Ihis proposal,or wish to be made a eatl n�WA 98055,b Erickson,Project Mana er, � � at(425)430-6581.Myone who suhmits writt n comm nts will automat�all b I ome'a t�rtb�Z If you ave questi n1s ot any tleclsion on ihis proJect. Y mail,contact Don Erickson Y P Y record antl will be notifietl � �ASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMaFw u � � ------ �ryv FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICAiION I DqTE OF qpp��CpTION I February B"',2002 NOiICE OF COMPLETE qpp��CA710N: February 77"�pppp I , DqTE OF NOTICE OF qpp��CA710N: I . Fe6ruary 71�,Zp02 I 1 6.ao rH � � � ' � �� I � I � FA� 4 a I � p �"' a i �£ SE IBS+N N r - �, � . � 6E/ y� � . � I Q Q � I i p o O � � I ❑ y� 3 � a I ❑ hd t�l �'ISoxa � O i If you would lika to be mada a a � � and return to:City oi Ranton,Develo ol racortl to re9ceiva further inlormation on this proposed proJecl,complete this form pmant Plannin,1055 South Gratly Way,Renton,WA 98055. FilalloJName: LUA-02•019,q,q� pp�KqNNEI(A710N-10%NOTICEOFINTENT NAME: ADDRESS: � TELEPHONE NO.: � NQTICEOFAPp��CATION CERTIFICATION �]� � �l�,� I, �1,� �UI�� I hereby certify that � copies of the above document were posted b�m in � cons icuous places on or nearby the described property on��—�� Signed: �,� .� ATTEST: Subscribed worn before me,a Notary Public,in and for the, tate of Washingt n es'di i ,on the�_7Yday of �Y`.f�.r_�O� • ��A.�P�Y6� &��HEFF ��TA�R� P�J�LIC � ��a.�s� �c��FF S�`ATE�FlfvASHINGTON 6�81P�+POIi�Ti�i�NTEXPIFtES:&29-03 COt��s�s�o�v �xP�R�s JURI�2�, 2003 �' F CITY OF RENTON ' DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: ( C(. II� �N.0�Gt�'J V►'1 APPLICATION NO: �'� � O2- DI� . A l�. The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER � �.� �� << �� (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) , r 4► ,• (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER � Applicant Certification I, ��f 1��1- iZl�'12�+1� , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) �� ""�'-- owners and their addresses were obtained from: � ' �'�`�� M��E�� `A � ° `�'��T PUBLIC ❑ Title Company Records ;� �!,r�-;� ��ASHINGTON ;� C�King County Assessors R��;��d�� EXPIRES � �`� ' � ;,. . �1t�3' �29, 2003 ..._ � _.-� � Signed ' Date 11 �Z ��j (Applicant) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in an for the State of Washington, residing at`�.2,�� on the 1 Z7'day of , �- , 20 O'z- Signed�72/� ��,►_-r'� Nota Public) MY APPOiNTMENT ***"For City of Renton Use'`"*"` � � � � ,-w,��-��.�-.�.;,�Q � �� :;;: ��'p� iC�Mt;�I�F�� CERTIFICATION OF MAILING �.��;�a��RY PU�LlC � � 1,1'm�xce.(�-1'��w , hereby certify that notices of the propose �r�at�h��IT� (City Employee) ��M�I��i�f��XPI��S JUf�E �9,2003 each listed property owner on 2� 1i �E�L � Signed I/� /:��-�—°~-� Date: �I 1/�U L NOTARY AT EST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in nd for the State of Washington residing at�,o,,,`�-8,n on the ��day of �� ,20� Signed (�-��- Iistprop.doc REV 03/DO MARILYN KApqCHEFF MY APPOINTMEWT EXPIRES:6-2�03 2 1 ; :l" � �\ ��. HING COUNTY DEPAI2TMENT O�'ASSESSMENTS PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES The City of Renton requires property owners to let their neighbors know of most proposed land use changes. Typical land use proposals requiring notification include � variances,platting and site plan approval. The city requires written notice before holding a hearing on the proposed change. The King County Department of Assessments will help property owners in this process. Their Public Information section is on the 7th floor on the King County Administration Building, 500 Fourth Avenue, Seattle. They have staff, computer ternunals, maps, and other materials needed to identify a11 affected parcels. 1. Identify your subject property and obtain its quarter-section-township-range map coordinates. Use the Kroll books, or the self-service terminals, or ask the County's public information staff for assistance. The terminals and staff are located on the 7th floor of the King County Administration Building. 2. Get a copy of the appropriate quarter section map from the County public information staff,plus a scaled template of the required radius. The Coianty can make photocopies if needed of portions of these maps. Map copies may be rriade � on the 7th floor. . 3. Locate your subject property on the map,then use the template to identify a11 adjacent parcels within the required distance. (Adjacent maps may be necessary in case of overlaps.) Determine the Assessor's account number of the parcels from the information included on the map. Public Information staff can assist you in cletermining the account numbers. 4. You may use the self-service terminals to�look up information on individual accounts. The Tax Information screen includes the taxpayer/owner-mailing address. The Property Characteristics screen and the index browse screens contain the property street-addresses in case you need to contact tenants/occupants where different from the taxpayer. Printouts may be made of any of these screen displays at 15 cents each. " 5. To Obtain Computerized Address Labels and/or Printouts: Obtain a Batch Request Sheet and Source Sheet(s) from public information staff. Fill out the request sheet and list the parcel/account numbers on the source sheet(s). 5.1 Examples are contained in the handbook referred to in Step 3. Return the sheets to County staff who will check them and assign a batch request number. 5.2 Sign an agreement limiting allowable uses of the information to be obtained (see example in handbook). One signed agreement will serve for the entire year. �,. 5.3 The 7th Floor staff will log your complete request and deliver it to King County Systems Services, 23rd floor of the Key Tower. 5.4 Systems Services prints labels and printouts on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday nights for requests received by 2:00 p.m. that day. They will notify you(per your request instructions) on the next working day when the output is ready for pickup. 5.5 You must pick up the labels or printouts at the Systems Services office located on the 23rd floor of the Key Tower. 5.6 Payment is required at the time of pickup. Minimum charge is currently $25.00 plus tax. Address labels are 65 cents each,plus tax;printouts are 60 cents per parcel, plus tax. DataCenter/DS 4001.doc Rev 12/Ol bh �¢�too�h �e�d S��e�sT�" Ud.� �1� Z� ��e�empla��fo�5160v , C ��322305916304 322305912402 322305910000 STECKLER MARTIN R&IRENE M LO ANDREW H K MCINTOSH ROBERT D+KATHRYN L 10012 SE 187TH ST 10035 SE 187TH ST 10104 SE 187TH ST RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 947600001004 947600020004 264140001001 SHEPPARD JOHN B STUTTGEN GLENN J BUI THU MAI+TAN DINH 10205 SE 185TH PL 10208 SE 185TH PL 10210 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 947600002002 947600019006 264140002009 REYES ALVIN A+LISA M NGUYEN RENE+TERESA+MICHAEL CHEA NORIN+PHANNY 10211 SE 185TH PL 10214 SE 185TH PL 10216 SE 186TH ST RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 � 98055 98055 947600003000 947600018008 947600004008 VANNGUYEN JOHN+LIEU MCCABE 70HN H+NANCY D Mt1RR JEFFRREY F+OFELIA � 10217 SE 185TH PL 10220 SE 185TH PL 10223 SE 185TH PL R�'��`�nF RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA �L�d �'�r�vQP, 98055 98055 98055 �}�I c�r�-�'s, 947600017000 264140004005 947600005005 REEVES MARK T+FRANCINE P LOUIE KENNY S SHIEH WUNJANG K+SIOUMING L 10226 SE 185TH PL 10228 SE 186TH ST 10229 SE 185TH PL RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 264140005002 264140046006 264140045008 DAVIS LARRY J DIMALANTA FRED J+CHRISTINE METTS DEBRA L 10234 SE 186TH ST 10335 SE 187TH PL 10339 SE 187TH PL RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 322305909705 322305928606 322305929802 AVZARADEL SOL GIBLER PAUL J+LOIS L CALAGIU GEORGETA 15722 SE 160TH PL 18404 102ND AVE SE 18414 102ND AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98058 98055 98055 322305909606 322305916205 322305917005 GUSTAFSON FRED E+DEBRA O MCNAIR REID H+MEGAN J LONGO L 18439 102ND AVE SE 18463 102ND AVE SE 18509 102ND SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 322305917609 322305917104 322305921403 KELLY CYNTHIA L MACKENZIE JOSEPH ENDZELL PAUL 18517 102ND AVE SE 18533 102ND AVE SE 18615 102ND AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 322305908509 322305926709 264140003007 GREENE HOMER L+EILEEN M TRU MALPHRUS THOMAS LE CINDY C/O RUTH W E 18616 102ND AVE SE 18713 102ND AVE SE 19222 108TH AVE SE RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 �I� ��'o Add�e�s L�be�s L��r 5�6�° Sm�o�h �e�d ��a�etsT�' � Use template for 5160� . + `�322305932509 855920018006 855920004006 MCCLELLAN H DONALD+MARY H SPECIALIZED HOMES CLAEYS JIM+SUSAN 2509 S 354TH AVE 3001 E YESLER WAY 4708 SMITHERS AV S FEDERAL WAY WA SEATTLE WA RENTON WA 98002 98122 98055 947600021002 312305908708 312305910001 KING COUNTY SCHNEIDER HOMES I LLC BILSKI B LEE+ROXANNE H 500 K C ADMIN BLDG 6510 SOUTHCENTER BLVD STE 1 700 SOUTH SOTH ST SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA RENTON WA 98104 98188 98055 312305915000 312305910407 312305904905 FINK LAWRENCE E+SALLY J COOKS HENRY E BUTTON A I 709 S SOTH 712 S SOTH ST 715 S SOTH RENTON WA RENTON WA RENTON WA 98055 98055 98055 855920015002 855920016000 322305902205 MACDONALD DOUGLAS M MANGLA SANDEEP+PREETI SINGLA FALK NINA E 718 S 47TH ST 724 S 47TH ST PO BOX 112 RENTON WA RENTON WA BLACK DIAMOND WA 98055 98055 98010 312305909300 MOORE PAUL M PO BOX 5985 KENT WA 98064 ��.��9��o A�d�ess ��ds �a�er 5�600 j.�, _� � �Y C�� i :: ,: * � � ��'N�� NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: � LUA-02-019,A,R;FALK ANNEXATION(10%Notice of Intent)&REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal would initiate annexation to the City of Renton of 13.66 acres on the East Renton Plateau (Soos Creek Area). The proposed annexation is within Renton's potential annexation area, and is contiguous to the City on its west and north. The process will include a public meeting and a public hearing on the annexation,and two public.hearings on the change in zoning from King County's R-1 Zone to City of Renton's R-8 Zone. No development is proposed as part of the request for annexation. PROJECT LOCATION: The site is bounded on the north by South 47`h Street and on the east by the eastern edge of the 102nd Avenue SE right-of-way. It borders the City of Renton along what would be 99`h Avenue SE, if extended: The site is approximately 685'by 855'. PUBLIC APPROVALS: Annexation&Rezone Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson, Project Manager, Economic Development, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February 22, 2002. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notifioation by mail,contact Don Erickson at(425)430-6581. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: February 8`h,2002 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATIQN: February 11'h,2002 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: February 11`h,2002 s.4-� r1r �' /� �W � ♦ � � d 4� � � F��K � � �', a � . � 2 SE �85"� � .. . � � � , N ' �� -� aa � � � � . Q q � Q � � o � � aa � Q ❑ � � � � � ,g�-� ❑ � o _ n If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project,complete this form and return to: City of Renton,Development Planning,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA-02-019,A,R; FALK ANNEXATION—10%NOTICE OF INTENT NAME: ADDRESS: � TELEPHONE NO.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION �i ��:��t _ �� ♦/��; �'�;:� ;,LL �, �:.�� Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department —� ��. Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 11, 2002 Ms. Nine Falk 18415— 102"d Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Falk Annexation &Zoning Project No, LUA-02-019,A,R Dear Ms. Falk: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on February 26, 2002. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at(425)430-6581, if you have any questions. Sincerely, ��,J�y.,G-�f�`� Donald Erickson Senior Planner accep ance � � � � � 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U RV E CITY OF RENTON � DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: �� G��i��,� / PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAM : %l/ ��/� A�vr,�'��or� ADDRESS: - PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: ��n: Z�P: s. �� r�� `oa�°�� TELEPHONE_NUMBER: C�y�MF�p KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): F � � � 4��G,�!� GISG" APPLICANT (if other� n ov�r�oQ � EXISTI��,�ANp� E(S): �/��o��f// NAME: /�/ �y C �LJ�- v {�Q�7�� W /� PROPOSED LA D USE(S): ��q�' �jG,�/l COMPANY(if appiicable): ��y�q� / EXISTING COMPREHE SIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: `g¢�� /OQ��D/�� • G�iC�'�V � � ��-t'/VI�'/O� � -� � PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION CITY: ��Q� � �� ZIP: ��05� (if applicable): �/��,�Z S/�� /�Y � TELEPHONE NUMBER EXISTING ZONING: �-� (�//1 G'��h�!!� PROPOSED ZONING(if applicable): �� /��v) CONTACT PERSON ` SITE AREA (in square feet): 59� �� NAME: �� /(J SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE(if applicable): � COMPANY(if applicable): /I��/ � �� G�� ?, j/� + ��j (.i � / .; ADDRESS: ��S� �� PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ��-G� (�l� f-j,O�L ACRE(if applicable): g �r�� ,e,oDY �Y � NUMB R OF PROPOSED LOTS(if pplicabl ):,_ CITY: ��1��/ ��/N ' ZIP: �� ' L/�1��0� ��J �U�� Q�OY� NUMBER F NEW DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): TELEP NE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: /f� ��3 ��G�S � Ci:��r�•u�d• �s . masterap.doc Revised January 2002 � PI, ;JECT INFORMATIOIV cont'i�,.__�ed NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS(if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: � � SQU RE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL � �/ IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS(if applicable): �y�/� ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE(if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL /�l BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): �u � ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE �� SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREAl1N0 / BUILDINGS(if applicable): � ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq.ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL � GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq.ft. BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): � ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq.ft. ❑ SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq.ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS(if ❑ WETLANDS sq.ft. applicable): NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE,�/ NEW PROJECT(if applicable): �� LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE QUARTER OF SECTION ;TOWNSHIP , RANGE , IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING.'COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ' ' ,.,,,_�'`. TYPE OF APPLICATION�& FEE�S�� Check all application types that apply--City,,staff will determine fees. �ANNEXATION(A) $ il/O GH�� SHORELINE REVIEWS COMP PLAN AMENDMENT(CPA) $ CONDITIONAL USE(SM-C) $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CU-A,CU-H) $ EXEMPTION(SME) $ NO CHARGE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW(ECF) $ _SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT(SM) $ GRADE&FILL PERMIT(GF) . $- � VARIANCE(SM-V) • $ � (No.Cu.Yds: ) $ , REZONE(R) $ SUBDIVISION _ROUTINE VEGETATION . _. . -$' _BINDING SITE PLAN(BSP) � $' MANAGEMENT PERMIT(RVMP) FINAL PLAT(FP) $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL(SA-A,SA-H).•• $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT(LLA) $ SPECIAL PERMIT{SP) $ PRELIMINARY PLAT(PP) $ TEMPORARY PERMIT(TP) $ SHORT PLAT(SHPL-A,SHPL-H) $ VARIANCE(V-A,V-H,V-B) $ (from Section: } $ Postage: $ WAIVER(W) $ TOTAL FEE $ OTHER: $ � AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name) /q1�+d � � , declare that I am (please check one) _the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation(please attach proof of authorization)and that the foregoing and answers r in con ' ed d the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. _ , I certify that I know or have satisfacto"ry evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes , mentioned in the instrument. . . (Signature of(�rwer/Representative) � , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington (Signature of OwneNRepresentative) Notary(Print) ' My appointment expires: masterap.doc Revised January 2002 = - � -_-_ S 17 th 67 S 43�St °� G s o � J� P �� O� - - , 45t i � � � � . � 0 � � - � �-- 6, � th `�' 55th St � , � > � � Fal k An nexation ° 600 12°° Exhibit 1: Vicnity Map 1:7 200 � �ti�Y o,� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning ♦� � Sue Culson,Administrator ��o Existing Corporate Boundary G.Del Rosario Pro osed Annexation Bounda ��NT�Z 3 7anuary 2001 � p ry FALK AleTNEXATION LEGAL D]ESCRIlPTIO�T The Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 32, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the North quarter(1/4) of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32; and TOGETHER WITH the West 30 feet of the North three-quarters (3/4) of the East half (1/2) of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32, lying north of the South 165 feet thereof. 322305-9096 322305 9097 322305 9097 Gustafson,Fred and Debra Taylor,Lolin and Jacki Avzaradel,Solomaon and Mary 18437 102°d Avenue SE 13530 476�'Avenue SE 15722 SE 160`�Place Renton,WA 98055 North Bend,WA 98045 Renton,WA 98058 322305-9097 322305-9097 322305-9022 Ruddell,Rebeno Ruddell,Susan L. Falk,Nina E. 3717 Beach Drive SVJ,#109 88 Virgia,Suite#23 18415 102°d Avenue SE Seattle,WA 99116 Seattle,WA 98101 Renton,WA 98055 ' CITY OF RENTON EC01�101l�IIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGI�SORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLr�NNIloTG MEMORANDUIVI DATE: February 7, 2002 TO: Jennifer Henning FROM: Don Erickson C�,��✓ SUBJECT: Falk Annexation and Pre-zoning Attached are 12 copies of the SEPA Checklist as well as the Application Review Sheet, the File Setup Form, and Notice of Application. We would appreciate it very much if this could be routed on Friday and posted by Monday, February llt''� Once we have the project number I will transfer the above forms over the Projects Files. Thank you. cc: Rebecca Lind DEVELOPMENT PLqIVNING C�7Y OF RENTON FE� 0 � 2002 RECEIVED Document9\d :, �- - �, . , � r City Of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHEGKL/ST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmenfal Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and fo reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPL/CANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposaL Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the quesfions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. !f you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complefe answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays latec. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assisf you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information thaf will help describe your proposal or its environmental etfects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additiona!informafion reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words 'project," "applicant,"and"property or site"should be read as "proposal,„ "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON A. BACKGROUND �� O � �� 1. Name of proposed project, if applicab/e: ��i�E� Proposed rezone of approximately 13.66 acre area from King County's R-1 Zone to Renton's Residential 8 du/ac (R-8) Zone. Zoning would be applied at the time the - subject site is annexed into the City of Renton. Falk Annexation Rezone ,��"��. " �, February 6, 2002 �� Page 2 ° 2. Name of applicant: Susan Carlson, Administrator, Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning Department City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Address: Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Department City of Renton , 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Contact Person: Don Erickson, AICP (425)430-6581 4. Date checklisf prepared: February 6, 2002 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works - Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Adoption of the rezone ordinance is anticipated pending SEPA compliance, at the time of annexation into Renton. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, exp/ain. Yes. Applicants have applied for annexation into the City of Renton. Under RCW 43.21.C.222 annexations are specifically exempt from SEPA. Upon annexation into Renton applicants or their successors will likely subdivide and develop vacant properties with single-family dwellings per the City of Renton's R-8 zoning. • 8. List any environmenta!information you know about fhaf has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. FEIS on the 1995 Comprehensive Plan of the City of Renton 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No knowledge of other pending governmental approvals of affected properties. Possible King County redesignation of Urban Separator to the west. 10. List any governmenfal approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. �;�`.: �..'�� " � - :'`.;: .- Council apqroval is required for this rezone. ��_':�t:_ ;; �'11::", ' Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and +� fhe size of fhe project and site. '. ..,, : , The subiect proposal is to rezone the non-street portions of the 13.66 acre Falk Annexation site from King County's R-1, 1 du/gross acre, to Renton's R-8, 8 du/net acre zone. The site could accommodate approximately 82 dwellings under Renton's R-8 Zone and approximately 13 dwellings under King County's R-1 Zone. Because their respective Comprehensive Plan land use designations are so far apart both jurisdictions are working together to come up with an acceptable resolution. Falk Annexation Rezone �'ebruary 6, 2002 , Page 3 12. Location of the p►'oposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and seciion, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject annexation site is located immediately south of Sout� 47th Street (in Renton) and extends approximately 720 to the south along 102" Avenue SE (in King County). Properties to the north and west of the site are in the City of Renton. (Please see attachments.) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); f/at, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The 13.66 acre site is rollinq beinq relativelv flat in its middle and southeastern portions but slopes more stee�ly to the west and its northeast corner The western portion drops about 30 feet and the northeast corner drops about 15 feet. B. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Renton Slope Maps indicate some small areas with slopes of 25% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, , gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultura! soils, specify them and nofe any prime farmland. Alderwood Association. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Althouqh there are 15% to 25% sloqes on the site, these have not been mapped as unstable soils. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Not applicable for this non-proiect leqislative action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, genera/ly describe. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-proiect proposal. Erosion presumably could occur as a result of future development under the proposed R-8 Zone. Mitigation measures would be applied typically at the time of future development. g. About what percent of the site wil/be covered with impervious surfaces after projecf construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Apnroximatelv 35%. No construction is proposed as a result of this non- project legislative proposal. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative r�oposal. Any future development occurring as a consequence of the proposed R-8 Zone would be required to follow management practices in the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Regulations (RMC 4-4-130) and in the Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations (RMC 4-4-060). Falk Annexation Rezone " February 6, 2002 Page 4 � 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during consfruction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximafe quantities if known. N/A. No new construction is proposed as a result of this legislative non- project proposal. At the time of project level development specific air-related impacts may be identified and appropriate mitigation measures applied. b. Are there any otf-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Unknown. Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or contro!emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable for this non-proiect leqislative action. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wet/ands)? If yes, describe type and provrde names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. The annexation sits on a ridge overlooking the Renton Valley area. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to(within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be atfected. Indicate fhe source of fi/l material. N/A. No construction is proposed immediately as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quanfities if known. N/A. No construction is proposed immediately as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 5) Does the proposal lie wifhin a 100-year f/oodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. The subject site is not mapped as part of the 1-year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. This is a non-project legislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this proposal. Falk Annexation Rezone February 6, 2002 � Page 5 ' , b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or wil! water be discharged to ground wafer? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A. This is a non-project legislative action. The proposed rezone is not expected to result in the discharge or withdrawal of water that is not now occurring. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;industrial, containing the following chemicals...;agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, fhe number of houses fo be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans fhe system(s)are expected to serve. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-proiect leqislative rp oposal. No new septic tanks are anticipated as a result of this - rezone. It is anticipated that development that may occur under the City's jurisdiction would connect to sanitary sewers. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collecfion and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other wafers? If so, describe. N/A. No construction and therefore runoff is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. Surface water appears to run off the southern portion of the site in a southwesterly direction towards the lower Cedar River Basin and from the northwesterly portion of the site to the May Creek Basin. . 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. Future new residential development would be hooked up to sanitary sewer. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Not applicable since this is a non-project legislative action. Future development allowed under the R-8 Zone would be required to comply with City of Renton Drainage Standards (RMC 4-6-030). 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetafion found on fhe site: X deciduous free:alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen free:fir, cedar,pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture Falk Annexation Rezone � ` `t February 6, 2002 Page 6 � crop or grain wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, ofher water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other ofher types of vegetafion b. Whaf kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? N/A. No construction and therefore no vegetation will be removed as a result of this non-project legisiative proposal. Future development will have to comply with Renton's Tree Cutting regulations (RMC 4-4-130). c. Lisf threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sife. None are known at this time. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native planfs, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegefation on the site, if any: Not applicable. This is a non-project action. As noted above, development that occurs under Renton's jurisdiction must conform to the City's codes and regulations. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds:hawk, heron, eagle son bir� other � Mammals: ee bear, elk, beaver, other Fish:bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endanqered species are known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Unknown, but the entire State of Washington is included within a migration route for birds known as the Pacifio Flyway. This flyway, as it overlies Renton, is used by a variety of migratory birds, including, but not limited to the Canada Goose. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife; if any: This is a non-project legislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this rezone proposal. Mitigation measures, if any, may be imposed at the time of future development. 6. ENERGYAND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heafing, manufacturing, etc. It is anticipated that the potential 82 dwellina units the R-8 zoning would allow on the site will use primarilv electircal and natural qas resources for heating and runninq appliances. Falk Annexation Rezone , �ebruary 6, 2002 , Page 7 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Unlikelv. Zoning provides some setbacks and restricts heights of new structures to 30 feet. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in fhe plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. This is a non-project legislative action. Future development occurring on the site will meet all related energy code provisions. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that mighf be required. N/A. This is a non-project legislative action. No special services are anticipated from future single-family residential development. 2) Proposed measures fo reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for examp/e: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? IVot applicable since this is a leqislative non-project action. 2) Whaf types and leve/s of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable. New development occurring under the R-8 Zone could include construction activity and normal noise associated with ground related residential living. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or confrol noise impacts, if any: None. This is a non-project action. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The majority of the 13.66 acre site is either vacant or partial developed with lower density single family homes. Existing densities are not believed to exceed 3 du/ac. Has the site been used for agricu/ture?If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are an estimated seven existinq single-familv dwellinps on the subject 13.66 acre site. Falk Annexation Rezone February 6, 2002 Page 8 ' d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? This is a legislative non-project rezone action. It is not anticipated that this proposed rezone will result in the demolition of any structures. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current Kinq Countv zoning classification is the R-1 Zone which allows 1 du/gross acre. The current proposal is for R-8 zoning that allows 8 du/net acre. f. What is the currenf comprehensive plan designation of the site? The 13.66 acre site is currently designated "Residential Single Famil�' on Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and "Greenbelt/Urban Seqarator" on King County's Comprehensive Plan Map. Renton's designation would allow zoning with up to 8 units per gross acre and King County's designation would allow zoning with only 1 unit per net acre. As a consequence the City and County are working together to resolve this issue. g. !f applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of fhe site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Renton's Sensitive Areas Maps identify the subject site as having some 15% to 25% slopes in the southeastern portion of the site and in its northeastern corner. No erosion areas were identified. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? At full redevelopment under the proposed R-8 zoning, it is anticipated that approximatelv 185 residents would reside on these 13.66 acres. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Unknown. This is a non-project action. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not a,pplicable at this non-project stage. !. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: As noted above the proposed rezone is consistent with the current Residential Single Family land use designation for the subject site. Discussions are underway with King County to possibly relocate their designated urban separator to the west to reflect the existing steep slopes between the plateau and the valley area below to the west. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units wou/d be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, midd/e, or low-income housing. Unknown. It is anticipated that 82 dwelling units could be accommodated on the subject site under Renton's R-8 zoning. . b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Falk Annexation Rezone rebruary 6, 2002 � > Page 9 - � _ � ,� Unknown. The proposed rezone will not eliminate any units by itself. As future development occurs some existing structures may be replaced and/or relocated although this is not currently anticipated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: The proposed zoning is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and applicable policies for this area. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. No new development is specifically proposed as a result of this change in zoning classification. Heights of residential structures are restricted to 30' in the proposed R-8 Zone b. What views in the immediafe vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Unknown. This is a non-project rezone action. This is not known at this level. c. Proposed measures to reduce or confrol aesthetic impacts, if any: Unknown. At the future project level impacts will be assessed and mitigated. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere - � with views? Unknown. Future single-family homes are not anticipated to result in glare that would impair views from surrounding properties. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Unknown. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and g/are impacts, if any: Not applicable. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? . A new City park is anticipated to be build on the former Cleveland property near SE 192"d and South Talbot Road to the west. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. This is a non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable at this non-project level of review. Falk Annexation Rezone �-��, - February 6, 2002 Page 10 ' 13. HISTOR/C AND CULTURAL PRESERVAT/ON a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to fhe site? If so, generally describe. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Unknown. This is a non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacfs, if any: Unknown. 14. TRANSPORTAT/ON a. Idenfify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the exisfing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Th� site is primarily served by 102"d Avenue SE and secondarily by South 47t Street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest fransit stop? Not di�ectiv, however there is bus service on Carr Road, some 1,000 feet to the north. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Unknown. Assuming 82 dwelling units and parking being provided between 1.75 spaces per unit and 2.25 spaces per unit, there potentially could be between 144 and 185 required off-street spaces developed over the 13.66 acre site. No spaces are anticipated to be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to exisfing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Potentiallv. Future subdivisions would be required to comply with City regulations pertaining to street width, curbs, sidewalks, lighting, etc. At this point it is difficult to anticipate what changes 75 new dwellings in the Falk Annexation area would require. New streets would most likely be local access streets or cull de sacs. e. Will the project use (or occur in fhe immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air fransportation? If so,generally describe. � No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed projecf? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. This is a legislative non-project action in which transportation impacts have not been identified since the actual levels of development are still unknown. However, if 75 additional units were built, and assuming 10 AWDVTE, there could be as many as 750 additional vehicles trip ends per 24 hour period (375"in", 375 "out"). Falk Annexation Rezone :�ebruary 6, 2002 > Page 11 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not a�plicable at this non-proiect level. Level of future development is speculative at this point. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire profection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Probablv. Residential development that might occur in the future would increase the need for public services that typically serve such development. Affected services may include, but would not be limited to, fire protection, police protection, emergency services, and schools. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacfs on public services, if any. The City of Renton currently collects mitiqation fees to control such impacts to parks and recreation, fire, and transportation. The City also collects taxes for most of these services. Until a specific proposal is made at the project level, however, it is too early to ascertain what these impacts, if any, will be. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. The current proposal is a non-project action. However, the area it would apply to appear to be served by sewer, telephone, electricity, and water. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinify which might be needed. Unknown. Non-project action. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: l`��L��:�'�?�r;/�� Name Printed: �-`��'"`� n �� Date: �� '�' '�c�� Falk Annexation Rezone '�, � February 6, 2002 Page 12 ' D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheefs should only be used for acfions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheefs for project actions.) Because fhese questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of fhe environmenf. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or fhe fypes of acfivities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How wou/d fhe proposal be likely to increase discharge fo water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or. producfion of noise? This is a legislative non-proiect rezone action that is not anticipated by itself to change operations at the subject site or increase substance discharges into the environment. Subsequent development, whether under the current County R-1 zoning or the proposed City of Renton R-8 zoning, would be required to comply with SEPA at the time of development, unless categorically exempt. Any new development will likely increase discharges to air, water, etc. These, however, are anticipated to be relatively small. Proposed measures fo avoid or reduce such increases are: This non-project legislative action. Subsequent development as a result of this proposed code amendment will have to go through environmental review unless SEPA exempt. It is likely that air emissions, etc. would be addressed at this time when type and quantities of discharges are more likely to be known. Because Renton's R-8 Zone would allow greater densities than King County's R-1 Zone, impacts will be greater but still be manageable. 2. How would the proposal be likely fo affecf plants, animals, fish, or marine life? No significant impacts to plants, animals, fish or marine life are anticipated to occur as a consequence of the proposed zoning action. The proposal would supplant existing County R-1 single-family zoning which allows 1 du/ac (gross) with R-8 single-family zoning, which allows 8 du/ac (net). As a result future development could be as much as six times denser than what is now allowed. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Not applicable. 3. How wou/d the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? This non-project legislative action will not directly impact energy or natural resources. Future single-family development will, however, likely result in some additional demand of such resources. Future development under Renton's R-8 zoning would allow up to 75 additional homes in the area. The County's R-1 Zone would allow approximately 7 new units. As a consequence the proposed zoning change would potentially increase the demand for energy and natural resources. Proposed measures to proteci or conserve energy and nafural resources are: , None are proposed, since this is currently a non-project action. Falk Annexation Rezone - �February 6, 2002 . Page 13 ' _ ' i 4. How would the proposal be likely fo use or affecf environmentally sensitive areas or areas designafed (or eligible or under sfudy) for governmental protecfion; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habifat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? This non-project rezone proposal will not directly impact environmentally sensitive areas. There are some steep slopes of 25% pr greater on portions of the site. It is anticipated that future development will plan around these areas. Whether future development occurs under County or City zoning these sensitive areas would have to be addressed. Proposed measures fo profecf such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None proposed at this time for this non-project action. 5. How would the proposal be likely fo affect land and shoreline use, including whefher it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatib/e with existing plans? This proposed non-project rezone will not directly affect land or shoreline use with new development. The proposed R-8 Zone, however, implements the Residential Single Family land use designation which allows single-family housing at 8 du/net acre. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None proposed at this non-project level. As noted above any new development under the proposed R-8 zoning will be reviewed by the City to ensure compliance with relevant state and local regulations. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportafion or public services and utilities? This is a legislative non-project action. Future development would result in increased demands on transportation, the use of utilities, or other services over what is allowed under current King County zoning. If additional homes are built in this area as many as 750 additional vehicle trips per day could be generated over a 24 hour period. Proposed measures fo reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None are proposed for this non-project action. Future development will be asked to mitigate any identified significant impacts. 7. Identify, if possible, whefher the proposal may conflict with /ocal, state, or federal laws or reguirements for the protection of the environment. No conflicts with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment are known to exist with the subject non-project legislative proposal. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: /`'""`�"��'` �G� t�� Name Printed: ��'�' � �J"� Date: �t-�' �� Z-G�t�'�' , G S 17�th 167 S 43� St c�� P O° 45t i � � � � � � � o � � _ � �- � � 1 t h `�' 55th St � > � � F�ik A� nexation � 600 1200 Exhibit 1: Vicnity Map 1:7,200 �ti�Y �{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning ♦O+ SueCarlson,Administrator �� Existing Corporate Boundary G.De]Rosario ��NTO$ 3]anuary2001 —� Proposed Annexation Boundary FALK ANNEXATION LEG�,L DESCRIPTION The Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 32, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the North quarter(1/4) of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32; and TOGETHER WITH the West 30 feet of the North three-quarters (3/4) of the East half (1/2) of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32, lying north of the South 165 feet thereof.