The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCED Planning File �Y �. O ♦ '� ''' ♦ � ��N�� MAPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATION AND ZOlvING PUBLIC HEARING COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF ANNEXATION WITH R-4 ZONING April 25,2005 The City has been notified that the Boundary Review Board approved the Maplewood East Annexation on April 11, 2005. T'hose signing the petition agreed to accept new zoning consistent with Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as well as assume their fair share of the City's existing outstanding indebtedness. Tonight public hearing is the second of two required for rezoning the site from the County's R-4 zone to Renton's R-4 zone upon annexation. As noted before,the site was one of three annexations that were vested with the density provisions, lot size and minimum lot configuration provisions of the former R-5 zone that was replaced with the R-4 zone, adopted by Council in November 2004. The subject site is within the City's East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area and is designated Residential Low Density (RLD)on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. King County has zoned it R-4 which allows up to 6 units per gross acre compared to a m�imum of 4 units per net acre under Renton's R-4 zoning. Unlike the County zoning,which allows both attached and detached units,Renton's new zoning only allows detached single-family dwelling units. Pursuant to Council direction staff have prepared both R-4 zoning and annexation ordinances for this annexation. Recommendation: The Administration is asking Council: • To support R-4 zoning, at four units per net acre and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Residential Low Density, on the subj ect site if it decides to accept the subject annexation; • To accept the Maplewood East Annexation and effectuate it with adoption of the annexation ordinance and concurrently zone the subject site, excluding public streets,R-4 consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Residential Low Density. Council Hearing Handout 11-22-04.doc\ ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET FOR MAPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATION Units Po ulation AV Existin dev. 9 23 $3,409,000 Full dev. 78 195 $28,912,000 Assumptions: 2.5 persons/household $400,000 AV/new unit $286,000 AV/existing unit f��v�ti��s:::::::::::::: Total revenues ...... .... ............... Existin Full Rate Existing :';'::';;$'I�t;2��;"�9' Re ular lev $10,704 $90,784 3.14 Full::::::::::�'1;21:;0��::�� Excess lev $302 $2,563 0.08865 State shared revenues Rate er ca Existin Full Li uor tax $3.52 $80.96 $686.40 Li uor Board rofits $5.04 $115.92 $982.80 Fuel tax- roads $14.46 $332.58 $2,819.70 Fuel tax-arterials $6.47 $148.81 $1,261.65 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cam er excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Criminal 'ustice $0.36 $8.28 $70.20 Total $686.55 $5,820.75 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existin Full Real estate excise" $40.86 $939.78 $7,967.70 Utili tax"" $133.20 $1,198.80 $10,389.60 Fines &forfeits" $18.33 $421.59 $3,574.35 Total $2,560.17 $21,931.65 '` Per capita "* Per housing unit- based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6%tax rate �Q�{� :: : ;: :; Total ongoing costs ............. Perca ita Existin Full Existing :':::':$'fF;�62:��: Contracted Services Full:::::;:;:��:�15;$3'I::J�: Alcohol $0.23 $5.22 $44.27 Public Defender $3.13 $72.08 $611.13 Jail $7.19 $165.42 $1,402.44 Subtotal $242.72 $2,057.84 Court/le al/admin. $57.08 $1,312.84 $11,130.60 Parks maintenance" $14.90 $342.70 $2,905.50 Police $282.00 $6,486.00 $54,990.00 Road maintenance** N/A $3,643.00 $7,905 Fire*"* $1.25 $4,261.25 $36,140.00 Stormwater maintenance N/A $374.00 $703.00 Total $16,662.51 $115,831.94 "See Sheet Parks FIA ""See Sheet Roads FIA "*'` Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact `**`$282/service call- .92 calls/MF& .74 calls/SF Existin �� g ::::::=�2;�0�:�� Full:::::::::::i::::$��?:'I9 f3ne;�i[�ie:�osts::Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA): $27,773.46 . Other one-time costs: $0.00 Total one-time costs:;:::;:::;::':��;�27:t�0 Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo -� Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Bicildirig, Roorrt 402, 400 Yesler Way, Senttle, WA 98104 Pho�ie: (206)296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • lrttp://wzvzU.irtetrokc.gnv/rrn�texntio�is April 11, 2005 {yh�..;'�j � � p�Er�i.F�,"3 ( R City of Renton . . Attn: Don Erickson, AICP Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING File No. 2187 - City of Renton - Maplewood East Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: We have received approval from King County engineering staff of the legal description for the above-referenced Notice of Intention. The Notice of Intention is now considered complete and has been officially filed effective. You will be advised of any further changes in the status of the Notice before the Board. Please be aware that any future final ordinance or resolution on the proposed action must incorporate the legal description approved by King County engineering staff, including any revisions made in response to the engineering staff review. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services Diane Murdock, Department of Assessments Bill Huennekens, Records and Election Division Paul Reitenbach, Department of Development and Environmental Services Michael Thomas, Of�ce Management and Budget FORM 12 � Washington State Boundary Review Board . For King County Yesler Bicildirtg, Room 402, 400 Yesler Wrry, Seattle, WA 98104 Phorte: (206)296-6800 • Fnx: (206)296-6803 • http://wzvw.�rtetrokc.gov/rrnriexatiorls February 25, 2005 RE�� City of Renton ��B 2 � `�� Attn: Don Erickso AICP EcoN°�'^'c p�zc��,; � NEIGHp,p p y.;,.,�;� Senior Planner � AND STRA7�!' : --�-�--.._�......_-��,..��::�w'.�.�pp.t� 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: SUNIMARY File No. 2187—City of Renton—Maplewood East Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: Enclosed is the Summary prepared by Boundary Review Board staff for the above-referenced Notice of Intention. The Summary will be sent to the Boundary Review Board members, along with the Notice of Intention, as part of the agenda packet for the neat regular monthly Board meeting. If you see any corrections or clarifications which should be made in the Summary, I would appreciate hearing from you at(206)296-6801. Sincerely, ` J �:E i�"'1�-�!�.R.._.-'� X`I�f'�✓f'�4.i..!'L.J� � Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Enclosure: Summary FORM ll ' SUMMARY FILE NO. 2187 Thomas Guide Map No. 657 Date Received: 02/16/OS Date Distributed: 02/17/05 ENTITY City of Renton Date Filed: ACTION Petition for Land Annexation Expiration 45 Days: 04/Q2/OS TITLE Maplewood East Annexation Board Meeting: 03l10/05 Location The site is located on the east side of the City of Renton. The westem boundary of the site abuts the eastern boundary of the Cit�r of Renton at 152"d Avenue SE. The southern boundary of the Maplewood East Annexation is generatty formed by SE 136thd Street (SE 2nd Court.) The northern boundary is generally formed by SE 134t'' Street ('rf extended.) The eastern boundary is formed by 156ih Avenue SE. Land Area Approximately 26.14 acres . Land Use Existin4: Nine single-family homes. Es6mated Future: Approximately 78 total residences Population Fxistina:Approximately 23 persons Estimated Future: Approximately 195 total persons Assessed Valuation $2,288,000. County Comprehensive Plan Designation Residential Use County Zoning Residenfial (R-4:4 dwelling units per gross acre) City Comprehensive Plan Proaosed: Residentia{Use City Zoning Proposed: Residential — (R-4 Zone: ma�mum 4 dwelling units per net acre) District Comprehensive Plan City of Renton Comprehensive Water&SeWer District Plan µ District Franchise No franchise is required. Urban Growth Area(UGA) The site is located within the Urban Growth Area as identified under the State Growth Management Act, King County Comprehensive Plan and City of Renton Comprehensive Plan SEPA Declaration The proposed annexation is exempt from SEPA pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.222 ENTITIES/AGENCIES NOTIFIED: King County Council Member(s) Dwight Pelz;Reagan Dunn King County: Clerk of Council,Department of Assessments,Fire Marshal,Heaith Division,State Department of Ecology, Puget Sound Regional Council,Municipal'dy of Metropolitan Seattie(Metro) Cities: Not Appiicabte Fire Districts: King County Fire Protection District No.25;Ciiy of Renton Fire Depafinent Water Districts: King Couniy Water District No. 90;City of Renton Water Utilities Department Sewer Districts: City of Renton Sewer Department School Districts: Renton School District No.403;Issaquah School District No.411 ' SUMMARY(File No. 2187) The City of Renton proposes the annexation of 26.14 acres, known as the Maplewood East Annexation. This annexation was proposed under the 60% petition method), pursuant to RCW 35A.14. Renton City Council adopted the petition for annexation in November of 2004. The site is located on the east side of the City of Renton. The western boundary of the site abuts the eastern boundary of the City of Renton at 152"d Avenue SE. The southern boundary of the Maplewood East Annexation is generally formed by SE 136thd Street (SE 2"d Court.) The northern boundary is generally formed by SE 134t''Street�f extended.) The eastern boundary is formed by 156th Avenue�E. The unincorporated area is included in the "Annexafion Element"of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and is located within the Renton Potential Annexation Area. The proposed action is consistent with City of Renton Comp�ehensive Plan policies addressing annexation, including those provisions which call for inclusion of urban areas within the City(e.g., LU-378—LU-380) and provision of senrices to incorporated areas(e.g., LU-383; LU-386, LU-392). The Maplewood East property owners are seeking annexation in order to develop properties under City of Renton regulations and to receive public services (e.g.,sewer services)from Renton. Presently the area includes approximately nine single-family residences. At full development,Maplewood East would include a total of approximately 78 homes. The City of Renton has planned for growth at this level of urban density and has established standards to guide ongoing uses and new development on the Maplewood East properties following annexation. Annexa6on would also permit protection for environmentally sensitive areas (e.g., storm watedflood management). More specifically,the City of Renton is prepared to provide development review and environmental review to the annexation area based upon local, regional and state regulations for protection of environmentalfy sensitive areas. The City of Renton can directly provide (or contract for) urban services to the area. For example, the City of Renton would provide police services. The City will provide sewer service, storm water management, and refuse collecfion. The City will con6nue to contract with Fire Protection District No. 25 to provide fire service and emergency senrice. King County Water District No. 90 will continue to provide water senrice to the Maplewood East Annexafion Area. Library facilities and recreation facilities would be available to the community. Children would attend schools in Issaquah School District No.411 or Renton School District No.403. The City of Renton reports that the proposed annexa6on conforms to the State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.) For example,the annexation is supported by RCW 36.7020,which requires community planning goals, for urban growth, services and infrastructure, and environmental preservation. Additionally, the application reportedly is consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (1), encouraging development in urban areas where there are adequate public services. It is also consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (12}, which calls for public services to support permitted development. Annexation would also permit development of primary land uses and corollary public services (e.g., roadways) envisioned in the Act. Environmentally sensitive areas would also be preserved under the provisions of this annexation. 4 Further, the Mapiewood East Annexation is reported to be consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. Following are examples of King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide Planning Policies that are addressed by the proposed Maplewood East Annexation: FW-13:Cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to Urban Areas. LU-31: The County should identify urban development areas within the Urban Growth Area LU-32: The County should encourage cities to annex territory within their designated potential annexation area LU-33: Land within a city's potential annexation area shall be developed according to local and regional growth phasing plans U-203: Population growth should be encouraged in Urban Grov,rth Areas U-208: Land capacity shall be provided for residential,commercial and industrial growth U-304: Growth should be focused within cdy boundaries. The proposed Maplewood East Annexafion is reportedly consistent with the provisions of RCW 36.93 (Boundary Review Board Regulations). For example, this annexation would be consistent with Objective 1, which calls for the preservation of neighborhoods. Tl�is area is linked to east Renton by social fabric (e.g.,similar land uses and open spaces,shared sense of community) and by natural/built geographic features (e.g., relatively flat to gentle sloping terrain). This annexation would also be consistent with Objective 3, which calls for creation of logical senrice areas, and Objectives 4-7,which call for the achievement of reasonable boundaries for a jurisdiction. Local residents have petitioned for annexation in order that all services and land use regulations affecting their area may be efficiently coordinated by a single local government unit. This annexation would also be consistent with Objective 8,which calls for inclusion of urban areas within municipalities. The City of Renton has conducted fiscal analyses related to the proposed Maplewood East Annexation. There are sufficient funds to serve the area. The addition of Maplewood East is not expected to have a significant impact on cost and adequacy of senrices, finances, debt structure or rights of other governmental units. Upon annexation, property owners will assume their share of the regular and special levy rate of the City for capital facilities and public services. At full development, city expenditures are estimated at $115,832 and revenues are estimated at $121,100. Future capital needs and costs will be examined and funded through the Renton Capital Investment Program. The City of Renton supports this annexation in order to serve cfizens of the area. New residential development and coordinated services would benefit the greater Renton community. ti�Y o� City of Renton � �: DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, � � ♦ NEIGHBORHOODS, and STRATEGIC PLANNING � �� Sixth Floor �NT 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 www.ci.renton.wa.us Date: 02/28/2005 TO: Lenora Blauman FROM: Don Erickson, AICP Executive Secreteary Office of Strategic Planning Wash. State Boundary ENDSP Department Review Board for King City of Renton County Phone: (206) 296-6801 Phone: (425) 430-6581 Fax Phone: (206) 296-6803 Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300 SUBJECT: Park Terrace & Maplewood Numberofpages including coversheet 2 East Annexations REMARKS: ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent ❑ Reply ❑ Please � For your be mailed ASAP Comment review Lenora, Attached are my comments on the suminaries for the Park Tenace and Maplewood East Annexations. I am faxing these per our phone conversarion this PM. If you can't make out my hand writing when you get this give me a call and we can go over it. Thanks, RENTON AHEAD OP THE CURVE SUMMARY FILE NO. 2186 Thomas Guide Map No. 626 Date Received; 02/16/05 Date Distributed: 02/17/OS ENTITY City of Renton Date Filed: ACTION Petition for Land Annexation Expiration 45 Days: 04/02/OS TITLE Park Terrace Annexation . Board Meeting: 03/10/OS Location The site is located on the east side of the City of Renton. The southern boundary of the site abuts the northern boundary of the City of Renton. The southern boundary of the Park Terrace An�exafion is generalfy formed by NE 7th Street/SE 122"d SNeet. The northern boundary is e formed by NE 8t" Street('�f extended.) The eastern boundary is '�;� '�� - formed by 40"' 'e is bordered on the west by Dwall Avenue N . q,� iM � Land Area Approximately 7.65 acres Land Use E�dsfinq: Seventeen single-family homes. Esfimated Future: Appro�amatety 23 total residences � , Population E�astin4:Approximately 42 perso � Estimated Future: Appro�amatety total persons r %. Assessed Valuation $3,551,000. County Comprehensive Plan Designation Residential Use County Zoning Residential (R-4:4 dwelling units per gross acre) City Comprehensive Plan Proaosed: Residential Use City Zoning Proc>osed: Residen6al — (R-8 Zone: ma�mum 8 dwelling units per net acre) District Comprehensive Plan City of Renton Comprehensive Water 8�Sewer District Plan District Franchise No franchise is required. Urban Growth Area (UGA) The site is located within the Urban Growth Area as identfied under the State Growth Management Act, King County Comprehensive Plan and City of Renton Comprehensive Plan SEPA Declaration The proposed annexation is exempt from SEPA pursuant to RCW 4321 C.222 ENTITIES/AGENCIES NOTIFIED: King County Council Member(s) Dwight Peiz;Reagan Dunn King County: Clerk of Council,Department of Assessments, Fire Marshal, Health D'rnsion,State Department of Ecology, Puget Sound Regionat Council,Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle(Metro) Cities: Not Applicable Fire Districts: King County Fire Protection District No.25;Cihr of Renton Fire Department Water Districts: King County Water District No.90;City of Renton Water Utilities Department Sewer Districts: City of Renton Sewer Department School Districts: Renton School District No.403; Issaquah School District No.411 �� SUMMARY(File No: 2186) The City of Renton proposes the annexation of 7.65 acres, known as the Park Terrace Annexation. This annexation was proposed under the 60% petition method), pursuant to RCW 35A.14. Renton City Council advpted the petifion for annexation in December of 2004. The Park Terrace Annexation site is located on the eastern boundary of the Cify of Renton. The site is located on the east side of the City of Renton. The southern boundary of the site abuts the northern boundary of ihe�City of Renton.�dThe southem boundary of the Park Terrace Annexafion is generally formed by NE 7 Street/SE 122 Street. The northern boundary is generally formed by NE 8t"Street (if extended.) The eastern boundary is formed b}rr140"' 'e is bordered on the west by Duvalt Avenue NE. The unincorporated area is included in the "Annexation ElemenY'of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and is located within the Renton Potential Annexa6on Area. The proposed action is consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies addressing annexafion, including those provisions which call for inclusion of urban areas within the City(e.g., LU-378—LU-380) and provision of services to incorporated areas(e.g.,LU-383;LU-386, LU-392). The Park Terrace property owners are seeking annexation in order to develop properties under City of �� Renton regulations and to receive public services (e.g., sewer services) from Renton_ Presently area includes approximately 17 sin -famity re�dences. At full development, Park Terrace include a total of approximately�omes. The City of Renton has planned for growth at this level of urban density and has established standards to guide ongoing uses and new development on the Park Terrace proper6es following annexation. Annexation would also permit protection for environmentally sensitive areas (e.g., storm water/flood management). More specifically,the City of Renton is prepared to provide development review and environmental review to the annexation area based upon local, regional and state regulations for protection of environmentally sensitive areas. � The City of Renton can directly provide (or contract for) urban services to the area. For example, the City of Renton would provide police senrices. The City will provide sewer service, stortn water management, and refuse collection. The City will confinue to contract with Fire Protection District No. 25 to provide fire service and emergency service. King County Water District No. 90 will continue to provide water service to the Park Terrace Annexation Area. Library facilfies and recreation facilities w uld be available to the community. Children would attend schools iM �,��i�Renton School District No.403. The City of Renton reports that the proposed annexation conforms to the State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.) For example,the annexation is supported by RCW 36.70.20,which requires community planning goals, for urban growth, services and infrastructure, and environmental preservation. Additionally, the application reportedly is consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (1), encouraging development in urban areas where there are adequate public services_ It is also consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (12), which.calls for public services to support permitted development. Annexation would also permit development of primary land uses and corollary public services (e.g., roadways) envisioned in the Act. Environmentally sensitive areas would also be preserved under the provisions of this annexation. Further, the Park Terrace Annexation is reported to be consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. Following are examples of King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide Ptanning Policies that are addressed by the proposed Park Terrace Annexation: FW-13:Cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to Urban Areas. LU-31: The County should identify urban development areas within the Urban Growth Area LU-32: The County should encourage cities to annex territory within their designated potential annexation area LU-33: Land within a city's potential annexation area shall be developed according to local and regional growth phasing plans U-203: Population growth should be encoGraged in Urban Growth Areas U-208: Land capacity shatl be provided for residentiat,commercial and industriat growth U-304: Growth should be focused within city boundaries. The proposed Park Terrace Annexation is reportedty consistent with the provisions of RCW 36.93 (Boundary Review Board Regulations). For example, this annexation would be consistent with Objective 1, which calls for the preserva6on of neighbofioods. This area is linked to east Renton by social fabric (e.g., similar land uses and open spaces,shared sense of community) and by natural/built geographic features (e.g., relatively flat to gentle sloping terrain). This annexafion woutd also be consistent with Objective 3,which calls for crea6on of logical service areas, and �bjectives 47,which call for the achievement of reasonable boundaries for a jurisdiction. Local residents have petitioned for annexation in order that all services and land use regulations affecting their area may be efficiently coordinated by a singfe loca!government unit. This annexa6on would also be consistent with Obje�tive 8,which calls for inclusion of urban areas within municipalfies. The City of Renton has conducted fiscal analyses related to the proposed Park Terrace Annexation. There are sufficient funds to serve the area. The addition of Park Terrace is not expected to have a significant impact on cost and adequacy of services, finances, debt structure or rights of other governmental units. Upon annexation, property owners will assume their share of the regular and special levy rate of the City for capital facilities and public services. .At full development, city expenditures are estimated at$36,925 and revenues are estimated at$34,987. Future capital needs and costs will be examined and funded through the Renton Capital Investment Program. The City of Renton supports this annexation in order to serve citizens of the area. New residential development and coordinated services would benefit the greater Renton community. SUMMARY FILE NO. 2187 Thomas Guide Map No. 657 Date Received: 02/16/OS Date Distributed: 02/17/05 ENTITY City of Renton Date Filed: ACTION Peti6on for Land Annexation s� l Expiration 45 Days: 04/OZ/OS TITLE Maplewood East Annexation u Q �� Board Meeting: 03/10/05 Location The site is located on the ea side of the City of Renton. The western boundary of the site abuts the astem boundary of the City of Renton at 152rtd Avenue SE. The south n boundary of the Maplewood East Annexation is generally formed by SE 136th° Street (SE 2"d Court.) The northern boundary is generally fo ed by SE 134"' Street ('�f extended.) The eastern boundary is formed byir156�'Avenue SE. Land Area Appro�mately 26.14 acres jc� ,Qp,s'�S1(�p D Land Use Existin4: Nine single-family homes. Estimated Future: Appro�amately 78 total residences Population F�istinq:Approximately 23 persons Estimated Future: Approximately 195 total persons Assessed Valuation $2,288,000. County Comprehensive Plan Designation Residential Use County Zoning Residential (R-4:4 dwelling units per gross acre) City Comprehensive Plan Proposed:Residential Use City Zoning Proaosed: Residential — (R-4 Zone: ma�amum 4 dwelling units per net acre) District Comprehensive Plan City of Renton Comprehensive Water�Sewer District Plan , District Franchise No franchise is required. Urban Growth Area(UGA) The site is located within the Urban Growth Area as identified under the State Growth Management Act, King County Comprehensive Plan and Ciiy of Renton Comprehensive Plan SEPA Declaration The proposed annexation is exempt from SEPA pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.222 ENTITIES/AGENCIES NOTIFIED: King County Council Member(s) Dwight Pelz;Reagan Dunn King County: Clerk of Councii,Department of Assessments,Fire Marshal,Heaith Division,State Department of Ecology, Puget Sound Regional Council,Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle(Metro) Cities: Not Applicable Fire Districts: King County Fire Protection District No.25;City of Renton Fire Department Water Districts: King County Water District No.90;City of Renton Water Utilities Department Sewer Districts: City of Renton Sewer Department School Districts: Renton School Dishict No.4Q3;Issaquah School District No.411 . , . ��l �� i�'�'. �te e�rs�rK ¢d � SUMMARY (File No. 2187) s�� e � The City of Renton proposes the annexation f 26.14 acres, known as the Maplewood Ea Annexation_ This annexation was proposed under the 60� petition method), pursuant to RCW 35A.1 . Renton City Council adopted the petition for annexation n November of 2004. The site is located on the east side of t e City of Renton. The western boundary of the site abuts the eastern boundary of the City of Renton t 152"d Avenue SE. The southern bound ry of the Maplewood East Annexation is generally formed by E 136thd Street (SE 2nd Court.) The northern boundary is generally formed by SE 134�h Street('�f extended.) The eastern boundary is formed by 56th Avenue�E. The unincorporated area is included in the "Annexafion Element"of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and is located within the Renton Potential Annexation Area_ The proposed action is consistent with City of Renton Comp�ehensive Plan policies addressing annexafion, including those provisions which calf for inclusion of urban areas within the City(e.g., LU-378—LU-380) and provision of services to incorporated areas(e.g.,LU-383; LU-386, LU-392). The Maplewood East property owners are seeking annexation in order to develop properties under City of Renton regulations and to receive public services(e.g.,sewer services)from Renton. Presentty the area includes appro�amately nine singte-family residences. At fuil development,Maplewood East would include a total of approximately 78 homes. The City of Renton has planned for growth at this level of urban density and has established standards to guide ongoing uses and new development on the Maplewood East properties following annexation. Annexation would also permit protection for environmentatly sensitive areas (e.g., storm water/flood management). More specifically,the City of Renton is prepared to provide development review and environmental review to the annexation area based upon local, regional and state regulations for protection of environmentally sensitive areas. The City of Renton can directly provide (or contract for) urban services to the area. For example, the City of Renton would provide police services. The City will provide sewer service, storm water management, and refuse collection. The City will continue to contract with Fire Protec6on District No. 25 to provide fire service and emergency service. King County Water District No. 90 will continue to provide water service to the Maplewood East Annexafion Area. Library facN�des and recreation facilities would be available to the communiry. Children would attend schools in Renton School District No.403. The City of Renton reports that the proposed annexation conforms to the State Growth Management Act(RCW 36.70A.) For example,the annexa6on is supported by RCW 36.7020,which requires community planning goals, for urban growth, services and infrastructure, and environmental preservation. Addifionally, the applica6on reportedly is consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (1), encouraging development in urban areas where there are adequate public services. It is also consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (12), which calls for public services to support permitted development. Annexation would also permit development of primary land uses and corollary public services (e.g., roadways) envisioned in the Act. Environmentally sensitive areas would also be preserved under the provisions of this annexation. Further, the Maplewood East Annexation is reported to be consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. Following are examples of King County Comprehensive Pian/Countywide Planning Policies that are addressed by the proposed Maplewood East Annexation: FW-13:Cities are the appropriate providers of local urban senrices to Urban Areas. LU-31: The County should identify urban development areas within the Urban Growth Area LU-32: The County should encourage cities to annex territory within their designated potential annexation area LU-33: Land within a city's potential annexation area shatl be developed according to local and regional growth phasing plans U-203: Population growth should be encouraged in Urban Growth Areas U-208: Land capacity shal� be pravided for residential,commercial and industrial growth U-304: Growth should be focused within city boundaries. The proposed Maplewood East Annexation is reportedty consistent with the provisions of RCW 36.93 (Boundary Review Board Regulations). For example, this annexation wvuld be consistent with Objecfive 1, which calls for the preservation of neighborhoods. Tf�is area is linked to east Renton by soaal fabric (e.g.,similar land uses and open spaces,shared sense of community) and by natural/built geographic features (e.g., relatively flat to gentle sloping terrain). This annexation would also be consistent with Objective 3, which calls for creation of logical service areas, and Objectives 4-7,which call for the achievement of reasonable boundaries for a jurisdiction. Local residents have petitioned for annexation in order that all services and land use regulations affecting their area may be efficiently coordinated by a single local government unit. This annexation would also be consistent with Objective 8,which calls for inclusion of urban areas within municipalities. The City of Renton has conducted fiscal analyses related to the proposed Maplewood East Annexation. There are sufficient funds to serve the area. The addition of Maplewood East is not expected to have a significant impact on cost and adequacy of services, finances, debt structure or rights of other govemmental units. Upon annexation, property owners will assume their share of the regular and special levy rate of the City for capital facilities and public services. At full development, city expenditures are estimated at $115,832 and revenues are estimated at $121,100. Future capital needs and costs will be examined and funded through the Renton Capital Investment Program. The City of Renton supports this annexation in order to serve atizens of the area. New residential development and coordinated senrices would benefit the greater Renton community. - Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Bicildirtg, Room 402, 400 Yesler Way, Senttle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 296-6800 • Fr�x: (206)296-6803 • http://zvwzo.rrtetrokc.goz�/rrririexatiorTs March 15, 2005 � � ��`''�� x� ; a ��AF� 1 7 �(��e,� ; cCONU�AIG f1�Vt�.OPhfEhl NEiGHE30RNpC�S, AND ST�tArtC,C i'LANNING City ofRenton K��R`�..�w.`�`� Attn: Don Erickson, AICP Senior Planner 1055 South Crrady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: REQUEST FOR REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION File No. 2187— City of Renton—Maplewood East Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: Enclosed please find a copy of the letter from King County Engineering staff regarding the legal description submitted as part of the above Notice of Intention. If you are in agreement with the corrections and suggestions made in the letter, please submit a revised legal description to our oi�ice as soon as possible. The corrected legal description must be used on all future documents related to this proposal. We suggest you direct any questions concerning the County Engineering recommendations to Nicole Keller, Road Services Division, at 206-296-3731. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Enclosure: Letter from King County Road Services Division cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council (w/o enclosures) Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services(w10 enclosures) FORM 8 RECE[Y�° �`� MAR 14 20� ; !(ir�g County WA StaEe Botnld�ry F� .:,u Road Services Division g��p��Q Department of Transportation KSC-TR-0231 201 South]ackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3856 March 3, 2005 Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Boundary Review Board YES-BR-0220 RE: City of Renton—Maplewood East Annexation(File 2187� Dear Ms. Blauman: Thank you for the opportunity to review the legal description for the proposed Maplewood East Annexation to the City of Renton transmitted with your February 17, 2005 letter. Staff has reviewed the enclosed legal description and found it to be unsatisfactory. The boundary descriptions are too ambiguous and leave much open for interpretation. Staff recommends using the following rewritten legal description using the boundaries highlighted on the accompanying Assessor's map. Those portions of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County Washington. Described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is the intersection of the westerly extension of the south line of the plat of Willowbrook Lane, as recorded in Volume 170 of Plats, Pages 1 through 4, records of King County, Washington, and the existing City Limits of Renton line as annexed by Ordinance #4760, which is also the east line of the west half of the Northwest quarter of said section. Thence easterly along said south line and the easterly extension thereof, to the point of intersection with the eastern right-of-way margin of 156th Ave NE (County Road 1049). Thence southerly along said eastern right-of-way margin to the intersection with the south line of the Northwest quarter of said section. Then continuing southerly along the southern extension of said easterly right-of-way margin, 30 feet more or less,to the southerly right-of-way margin of SE 136th Street (Renton Avenue). �•Q1tOZM � . . . Lenora Blauman March 3, 2005 Page 2 Thence westerly along said southern right-of-way margin to the intersection with the east line of the west half of the Southwest quarter of said section. Thence northerly along said east line, 846.04 feet more or less, to the Point of Beginning. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Nicole Keller, Vacations and Boundaries Engineer, at 206-296-3731 or via email at Road.R/Wvacations@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, � �� Lydia Re olds-Jones Manager Project Support Services LR:NK:htk Enclosure cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the King County Council (w/enclosures) Peggy Dorothy, Legislative Analyst,Utilities and Technology Committee � Paulette Norman,P.E., County Road Engineer, Roads Services Division(RSD), Department of Transportation(DOT) Nicole Keller, Engineer II,Road Services Unit, RSD, DOT z � � EXHIBIT "D" MAPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATION R-4 REZONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 14,Township 23 North, Range S East, W.M., lying southerly of the south line of the plat of Willowbrook Lane, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 170, Pages 1 through 4, inclusive, records of King County, Washington, westerly of 156th Ave SE, northerly of SE 136`�Street and easterly of 152"d Ave SE. All situate in King County, Washington. F.ILE N0. 2187 - CITY OF RENTON - MAPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATION Assessed Value, Addresses, and Lots Sizes Table for Maplewood East P�D Adciress Uwner's Name Lat S�ze Assessed Va1ue 142305 9006 15406 SE 136 B ant, Frank 0.99 acres $255,000 142305 9033 15502 SE 136 Ehlert,Donald 1.00 acres $302,000 142305 9035 13325 156 NE Needham, Tom 0.45 acres $262,000 142305 9040 13425 156 NE Santa Cruz,M 0.22 acres $169,000 142305 9047 1252 120 Ave Colony Homes 9.11 $755,000 NE 142305 9059 13527 156 NE Hill,Edward 0.55 acres $241,000 142305 9082 13407 156 NE Clairmont,Kim 0.22 acres $213,000 142305 9083 115 Vesta NE Bales Limited 4.10 acres $420,000 Partners 142305 9117 15320 SE 136 Trans Khoa, C 1.0 acres $272,000 142305 9118 7630 S 115 Saito,Michael 1.0 acres $160,000 142305 9110 P.O. Box 3015 Bales Limited 4.10 acres $360,000 Partners TOTALS 22.74 acres $3 409,000 -� , r-° , , , , - •, , CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: For Agenda of: DeptlDivBoard.. Economic Development, November 8, 2004 Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Staff Contact...... Don EriCkson (x6581) Agenda Status Consent.............. X Subject: Public Hearing.. X Correspondence.. Maplewood East Annexation—60%Direct Petition Ordinance............. Resolution............ Old Business........ Exhibits: New Business....... Issue Paper, Study Sessions...... 60%Petition Information......... KC Certification of Sufficienc Recommended Action: Approvals: COunCll ConCUT. Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment. Amount Budgeted.......... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Pro�ect.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Council accepted a 10%Notice of Intent petition to initiate annexation of approximately 26.14- acres located between 152°a Avenue SE on the west, 156th Avenue Se on the east, Willowbrook Lane Subdivision on the north, and SE 136th Street on the south on May 3, 2004. The proponents have submitted a 60% Petition to Annex that has been certified as sufficient by the King County Department of Assessments on September 13, 2004. Under State law, two public hearings are required to be held on the zoning that would be applied if the proposed annexation is accepted. Council is being asked to accept the 60%Direct Petition to Annex and hold the first public hearing on future R-4 zoning. The Administration is also seeking authorization to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board for King County for its 45-day review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council set November 22, 2004 for a public hearing to accept the Maplewood East Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex, to hold the first of two required public hearings on future zoning, to authorize the Administration to send the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board for King County, to prepare a zoning ordinance consistent with Comprehensive Plan land use designation for this area, and to prepare an annexation ordinance for enactment of the annexation if Council decides to proceed with it. H:\EDNSP\PAA�AnnexationsVvlaplewood East�Agenda Bill 60%.doc/ , " � t CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: November 19, 2004 TO: Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson(x-6581) SUBJECT: Maple�vood East Annexation —60% Direct Petition ISSUE: Should the Council accept the 60%Direct Petition to annex now that the King County Department of Assessments has certified that 60% or more of the annexation area's assessed value is represented by its signers? If the Council accepts the 60% Direct Petition,what zoning classification should be applied at the time of annexation since the RLD designation allows three different zones? If the Council accepts the 60%Direct Petition, does it authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board to begin its 45-day review period, pursuant to RCW 36.93.090? RECOMMENDATION: On the basis of the following analysis, the Administration recommends that Council accept the 60%Direct Petition to Annex for the Maplewood East Annexation. If Council concurs with this recommendation, the Administration further recommends that Council take the following action: • Accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex for the Maplewood East Annexation; • Authorize it to prepare a zoning ordinance consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Residential Low Density(RLD) for the 26.14-acre non- street portion of the annexation site; and, , : Maplewood East Annexation—Acceptance of 60%Direct Petition, etc. November 19, 2004 Page 2 • Authorize it to prepare an annexation ardinance so that if Council decides to proceed it can be effectuated by ordinance. • Authorize it to forward the Notice of Intent package for the Maplewood East Annexation to the Boundary Review Board, beginning its 45-day review period. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The City received the 10%Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition on March 8, 2004 and after having the signatures certified by the King County Department of Assessments the Council held a public meeting with the applicants on Apri122, 2004. Council at that time required that the annexation area be zoned consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and that property owners within it assume their proportionate share of the City's outstanding indebtedness. Under the Residential Low Density land use designation three zones are allowed: Resource Conservation(RC) with one dwelling per 10 acres; R-1 with one unit maximum per each net acre; and, R-4 with four units maximum per net acre. Given that the current King County zoning allows up to six units per gross acre with bonuses or development rights transfers, the City is recommending R-4 zoning for this site. Because this annexation is at the 60% Direct Petition level it must be rezoned consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which in this case is the R-4 zone. However, because it has already achieved 60% sufficiency as a direct petition it and two other similar annexations with certified 60% Direct Petitions will be allowed to use the lot size and density provisions of the R-5 zone. This latter zone is being replaced by the City's new R-4 zone. On August 17, 2004 the City received a 60% Direct Petition to Annex for this 26.14-acre site and forwarded it to the County for verification of the validity of the signatures and the assessed value they represent. On September 13, 2004, the King County Department of Assessments notified the City that the signatures listed were sufficient under the provisions of RCW 35.13.002 to equal or exceed 60% of the area's assessed value. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.340, the City is required to hold two public hearings before rezoning the subject annexation site. The first of these would be at the time the Council accepts the 60% Direct Petition to Annex. The second would be after the Boundary Review Board for King County completes its review and approves the proposed annexation. In the 10% issue paper for this annexation staff noted that City reviewers had raised no major obstacles to annexation. Parks noted that there was a shortage of neighborhood and community parks in the area and that future parks development for this annexation would require an eventual public expenditure of$27,773 in excess of what the City would receive in terms of parks mitigation fees. And, Surface Water noted that the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Mani{al Level-2 flow control requirements should be required of new development, unless the City adopts stricter standards in the future, in which case they would apply. The fiscal analysis conducted by staff for this project indicated that at full development there would be a surplus of$6,515 per year, in 2004 dollars. CONCLUSION: . Maplewood East Annexation—Acceptance of 60%Direct Petition, etc. November 19, 2004 Page 3 The proposed Maplewood East Annexation has been certified by the County as having sufficient signatures to represent 60% or more of the area's assessed valuation. It also has reasonable boundaries and appears to comply with relevant Boundary Review Board objectives. Reviewing staff raised no significant obstacles to this annexation. The proposed Maplewood East Annexation appears to further the City's business goals and be in the general welfare and interest of the City. Johnson Annexation—60%Direct Petition • , � • 0 SE 120 h S C9 w > � � � 124th PI w �� z � a� w ' a� � > ¢ � � � � I � � o � � � h PI � E th h St S 1 8th St � � d St SE 1 t t. � S E 13 n d t d z > _ w > � °' � SE 134th t. � c Q o � � � � S t � �' . E 13 th t. �-1 I I � L_L_J SE 1 th . �, � � ie > 1 t P , � � � �_�i S 1 9t "' � I 9t I. > � Q t � � � � ' �' �, � cn 2r St. Proposed Maplewood East Annexation o goo 1600 Figure 1: Vicinity Map Site Boundary —- — City�imits 1 : 9600 Gti��YR�o,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning _._.— UCbdfl GfOWtII BOUC1ddCY � �r � Alcx Pic[sch,Administraror �. �k�� G.Dcl Rosario �L�N.pO� 10 March 2004 I � �, � . #� x� �' � ,�• � � �.s�- _. � . .� .:� ... . �� . � � � �'" '1 � .�� .. * � i y • 'a-}.�.y�, . 1 ,� '�}� �+� w { x�. ��9 . . �. i . .. ' ..3 ' �i e� � t � _� � '�R�� :,.� � _ •�_ ---'- ..,M+� — �Y t� �� _s.� ��'�'� C" � � �� jf'� t k�� , ' . . . .. ` . .R � �y n,. ,�.,�'t�� 'y+� a >��.,,. . `" _ � ' � � .� ..,:.. ` .;,,.. . I� ' �'�" _' f H �f _, �� -a- '� 'a. � �."� ---�-- . �. _ ' ' � ,, r - �a-�� .. �r, � a,,�.,. 'n i .e� -M� .a-. �� , . � � � ��.,�.. t _.. . .. .. r ��. . ._ �.- I .�. .'[ ' �'� .�... � -r� a�,� � ":� � � p� .y r :. ,d�-. � � � . .- Y .- , , . . . . , , � , . �� - .: 4 �., � ,�,y�. � '. k� Zy�� , .. . J ' ' '-�. ,I . . , .. *S. � µ#''�� ,�{.�da' ywyJ � „�.� �� ,��'.' ��: '�' f �' ,},.,r f�:�k8 * �.'fv Y:�' r, . �A. ;l,..._> �R '."�r,p`'"� 6�� tw.��'� .�,�y' .� y �y t �� ,*�-` � ..�/ "�+�t��'i.�' , � * .�.R' 'f ,3. .. y�.r r�' � s x�� 7�',y� 1'' '+ , . - t•''y' � «"4�a�. , �•. . � � ';a,�.�Ey, � � r�� ,�� +.�. �'v��i.j, . � �f� ' .2 R .*.., ... . . — ..�a . .. —.— Y ;�i�;�� . f��r.� � 4�� ,�y � w�... . .. � 4�` f. � i � .i� ��' �y «r, . i�:y ' �. -�.. �:�'�'`��:,�� Y; ''" „�� `�°* �_ � ' �,�;,r "� „�.�'� �{ �A �� . `>:.�« a �"'� �:� '�� 'Rl � �� y: z� .t �"'�"�.�'��"_,�---- � .,�� , v t. . � �*�i � •" y�(, ��:.�,r r�,�� u ,'?4.. ��N�� .#„`= �� 'J^.. �� .,.,'° � .,�' � '�t ' ,� �,�, ,�,.�,,�� -,� - ,�•' � �:`�� • ��'�,�,,' �.: , � ' �-�� ,� � ��:� �.� , :� , � w'�c ��,,,�# `�" � t�' � ,i r �� x� � f�., � . ; � '� � ��}*�f � � � '� " ,�, ,�. � �'��rt''a ',�'�.,�'t� � �s�, . � "� � � � , �+ � Y ' �y�^.. , ' ,� �,....; z . n � � � * `�� :r" _." � �� °� d � � � � x +4. �� '..t,.a 'k"3 , �" .� �"t� .� ��''',� � �r;� `� � �.� ��. . � 'i �r �� `�� ,�� . *�fi '�'4., » � +� �. . . � .:.;Y `�i, ,t ��-r `�� 't , � � ' s _ l '; � � '�i , ` �y.. �3 % i j � Y� ' I .Fs�� , �� 'i I � rw ' 7. , y . � + ¢ +*f� .. � ... .+ ' I .. � L...:p��.. �. �i' � �+ ' . . +. � _ . w � � .`�t' '� �'� m * , ; � � � � � — .,.� j, �: ,t� ;i�� ' '� �., �i.. • � .._ '� `� . �,r{..�`;w`�� .._ � .- � . . . .. ..� , . . � � r `�a � ' ` . '�y ' .. � t t •> , .. . p . ,�`�+w�. �'.,,y, X..�} . �_.,.�.fi Y '� ; �; � �'> '� '� '� 4� �°` , �.. ..^-'� �' -- �.� �� ,�. � � — �'�- [� +.. . '�Y. .r . { j. I r } f � � `Y _ � �. � < w ,� ' ,.. � 1�: . . '� `w �� iIR�'� c..:Jy � � ,.� '�Fa .y�'..WR +5..� � .... �. � _ �'. «� ��.- � � ..'� '4 . i a ., . _ '►,� .�+' � _,. !i ty , �.. i`'4"�.' �rI� ip+�'� i r n 1 �'�"�r . .. . . , . . y � � . ." .� . . ,�y ' � �. ` • .:.. , . .., +Y �y � �d� 4, . . . :dt;�s ,,,�r�- �qf+yi��^ey'�y. �['1'��. � i �,.. af.'�� .�� .. �, ' . � �� .. �`Y . . ,* ... . ,� .�::�y .. .*` .1Rr � - � _.+�'�-�s.'�,i. �ti4- �-.�'1F° . � ,�`...��... Proposed Maplewood East Annexation o zoo 400 Figure 2: Aerial Map Site Boundary ——— City Limits 1 : 24�� t'�Y o Economic Develo ment,Nei hborhoods&Strate ic Plannin �0�, P g g g -•—•— Urban Growth Boundary � � * Alex Pictsch,Adminis[ra�or G.Del Rosario �AN.pO� 10 March 2(x� • ' , : ' 1 .68 x x19J.l9 {4.47 x x K x 51.14 157.61 153.57 154.51 155. 2 118.4] x X X x 15].56 X x x 156.65 15.]4 x x is � 'X � 15 X 136. x X / 1 7.59 f 16. x x X 147_71 148.5] X X 6.57 X x a.�� x � 156 9] I x 144.] (/�\ /� 1}E l �1 � _ � � v �. \ ' ` l', X �� r � X . '� � I \ '.56.19 �\ ( I � . � \ �� \ 1 � �_� ... \ � r. \ Y � J _ X 14Sa1 � \ // L ta3.13 � X \ \� X `� 114.1� � J ; X \ 153. \ �.. � 1t4.{2 \ X \ ~�\„ 1i O � ��_.. _ � 1 �� 1 \ � < << � � ^ � � `_,° � � � �--- � _ 1 - � � �, -�- � � � � , � ��'�� '� — � � �� .� � � � � 1 _ , �_ � � _� ,_ �� x � � r � ' X 12].56 \ \ � //�I 1�7.26 x \ I X127.21 130.1 � 8 117.70 x / 127.30 x t 32 31 124.51 X 120.60 127.25 x � X X ��C _- - !� � 7s `W • ` � Proposed Maplewood East Annexation o Zoo 400 Figure 4: Topography Map Site Boundary ——— City�imits 1 : 2400 Gti�Y 0,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning _._.— UCbdfl GfOWtII BOUflddfY ♦ � ♦ Alcx Pictsch,Administrator 1 m Interval Contour u�� G.Del Rosario �L•'�,TO� 10 March 2004 I � King County Department of Assessments Scott Noble King County Administration Bldg. Assessor 500 Fourth Avenue,Room 708 Seattle,WA 98104-2384 (20�296-5195 FAX(20�296-0595 Emall:assessor.Wo@metrolcc.=ov www.metrokc.gov/assessor/ ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted September 9, 2004 to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton of the properties described as the Maplewood East Annexation, has been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of Revised Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002. The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to be the case. Dated this 13� day of September, 2004 ----._•. Scott Noble, King Co ty Assessor �m�1202M " � ' ;;, CITY OF RENTON � Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning K ta hy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator September 9,2004 Mr.John Sweetman,Director Accounting Division King County Department of Assessments 500 Fourth Avenue,Room 709A Seattle,WA 98104-2384 SUBJECT: CERTIFICATION OF 60%DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX- PROPOSED MAPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATION Dear Mr.Sweetman: Enclosed, please find a petition form and accompanying documentation that together comprise one 60%Direct Petition to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition. T'he request to annex to the City of Renton, a code city, is made under RCW 35A.14.120. The Petition is transmitted to you for certification of sufficiency of signatures. Under this method of annexation signatures representing at least 60% of the area's assessed value are required pursuant to applicable sections of the RCW. A map displaying properiy identification numbers for this annexation has been included to facilitate your review. If you have any questions or require additional materials, please do not hesitate to call me at (425) 430-6581. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this request. Sincerely, v Don Erickson,AICP ` Senior Planner/Strategic Planning Enc. �---- � 1055 South rady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N �This paper coniains 50%recycied material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E . — � � �� I I � i I I I I � �—F�->, –_--- � I � I ; j � I � i � i I�----- � � -" -�--' � i i �-- � - -- - , 1-i__� _�- � --- --�----�---�--- � I � � � - ��--�---�-_r�--- �' � ` I ' I ; ; --�---- ` � I I � � � �i�� /� �� ir� I �� , _ �¢�� s � /��5" �� --- ��,��.� �� - 9� �- �- �� 9 ` I I � I � �� '� � � �--� � , � � Proposed Maplewood East Annexation o Zoo 400 Figure 6: Sensitive Areas Map Site Boundary �Y ——— City Limits 1 : 2,4�� O,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strate�ic Planning _._._ Ufbdil GfOWIh BOUI1C1df)/ � � + Alcx Pictsch,Admini�trator � G.R:1 Ro�ano �ANTO� 10 March?(NM � � - -- -- ------- -- - — , �.� - -- � � i � � I -,�-- - i i � i —___ � I i I --- i i i I I i � i� —— � i ' � _ �� ' ' i � —�-- !--�L—---' ---— --- � — � � I ---- � , -- --—��— I — — j '�� I I j I i � -��-- -i--- � i �\ i I 'I i i i i \ i � � � i� � -- i i i i i i � �-- , —— -- I� � � i � I I�� - i�\�% � � �--- ! � �-=- � �'��,�� i /�v�,�� -- �¢= �d� �//� j �� ., '� " - - ----- - -------- � /��''�� P,�'�� -�� -- ------ ----- ----------��<� S --�— � /��-��.� %D�f7 �� i � _ /�,��-� �/� %�3�r" /i�7 �� 9� � � .�� 9c.�� ; i�x� � � I i ��1 � � � , � IJ � � I ` I ��1 � � � I I I \ - ' ' -�� I� I i -- � � � I , � r � � , ` - � i ; -- -- _-- Proposed Maplewood East Annexation o Zoo 400 Figure 6: Sensitive Areas Map Site Boundary ——— City�imits 1 : 2400 ti�Y 0 Economic Develo ment,Nei hborhoods&Strate i�Planning c,�.� p € g ' -�-�- Urban Growth Boundary � � * Alcx Pictach.Administtator `�� G Dcl Rotiario ��N'L�Z I()M�rch 2(Nkl � � ' Annexation Review Form [X ] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition .�>, :�:. ,.�, ��,�,;r.,�:�,�....,:z.,:�„•��; TO : Building �:;� Surface Water Utili Fire 1Nater Utiiity° � Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . PROPOSED MAPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATION Location : Subject parcels are located in the NW 1/4 of 14-23-05 in the Briarwood Hills area. The annexation site, including adjacent street right-of-way, is 26.14 acres. It is bounded by 152"d Ave SE and Maplewood Estates on the east, SE 136th Street on the south, 156th Avenue Se on the east, and approximately SE 134th Street, if extended, on the north. 156�'Avenue SE is the major north/south community collector in the area, connecting SR 169 to SE 128tn Street. Date Circulated: March 26, 2004_ Comments Due: April 2, 2004_ General Information Area : Approximately 26.14 acres. Street length : 2,914 tinear feet (existing); 3565 linear feet (est. for build out) Assessed Value : $2,288.000 (existing development) � Estimated Population : 20 Current; 195 at Full Development Current Uses Residential : 8 single family units Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density Future Uses: : Detached residential units Future Population : 195 persons (78 housing units). Reviewing Department/Division: Surface Water Utilitv 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your departmenUdivision? The Maplewood East annexation area is located in the Cedar River basin. Maplewood East drains to a natural stream (Orting Hills Creek), which flows through densely vegetated open space at the SW corner of the annexation area. Eventually, Orting Hills Creek discharges to the Cedar River at 149th Ave SE and SE Jones Road. There are erosion, water quality and fish habitat problems within the Orting Hills sub-basin, per the Cedar River Basin Plan Current and - 1 - . � Future Conditions Report. The downstream drainage course is in unincorporated King County, except for the runoff of 152"d Ave SE, which drains to the existing Maplewood Plat stormwater pond. If 152"d Ave SE is extended, then the additional pavement should not drain to the same storm water pond, unless it is proven that the pond can absorb the extra runoff volume and still mee � utflow limits within a c�tain margin of safety. �,� W - During any future engineering review for development, the City of Renton shoutd require a thorough downstream analysis from the design engineer. This is always important, but especially when we discharge to another jurisdiction. Euture development within the proposed annexation area shall be required to comply with the 1998 Kinq Countv Surface Water Desi'gn ,117fanual L-------eveT-2 flov�control and water quality requirements or.s�#he.r�ligl��s�n�dds,that ra e adopted at th___ e_time of development. Wetland investigation and reports may be required for projects that devetop in the propose annexation area. 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? � The west side of 156th Ave SE doesn't have any drainage facilities, and road runoff sheet flows onto private properties. This could lead to storm drainage complaints and maintenance requests. No related drainage complaints have been recorded with the County, though. 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? The existing portion of 152NDAve SE was built as part of the existing Maplewood development, and drains to the Maplewood stormwater pond to the West, within Renton city limits. Otherwise �9��the upstream and downstream storm drain systems are in King County. However, we do not ��; anticipate any problems with regard to these drainage systems, provided adequate stormwater ��;j design standards are required as part of any development within the proposed annexation area. 4. Can you provide an estimated rough dollar figure of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at build out (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? The existing drainage features that would add to the maintenance responsibilities of the City of Renton Surface Water Utifity are located along 156T" Ave SE, SE 136T" Street, and 152ND Ave SE. The existing drainage system along 156T" Ave SE, is comprised of 782 ft 12-inch diameter, corrugated plastic pipes (CPP), 45 ft 12" concrete culvert, 5 type I, and 3 type II catch basins. Along SE 136'h Street, we found 9 type I catch basins, 1345 ft 12"diameter CPP, and 140 ft 12" diameter ductile iron pipe (DI). At 136T"Ave SE, we located 3 type I, and 3 type II catch basins, 820 ft 24"diameter corrugated polyethylene pipe (CPEP), 25 ft 12" CMP, and 100 ft 12" CPEP. H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations\Maplewood-East\Maplewood- East-REVU10%.doc\RVtp -2- The existing public storm systems in the proposed annexation area and the estimated cost for maintenance only of these storm systems are summarized below in Table 1 - Existing Public Storm System Infrastructure: TABLE 1� ��ing Public�m�stemdn . �: TYPE SIZES NUMBER UNITS UNIT TOTAL AVERAGE OF COST COST ANNUAL FACILITY (Maint. Only) (per 5 years) COST Pipe 12" -36" 3257 linear feet $0.31 $1,009.67 $201.93 Ditch (grass) to 6 ft. deep 750 linear feet $0.91 $682.50 $136.50 Catch Basins Type 1 17 each $10.45 $177.65 $35.53 Catch Basins Type 2 6 each $44.37 $266.22 TOTAL: $1,870 ..`'`f� $374,�a J'��4 With an additional 3565 linear feet of street length at full build-out, we estimate the additional assets that would be constructed to serve the streets are 4100 lineal feet of 12 to 36-inch diameter storm pipe, along with 36 Type 1 and 18 Type 2 catch basins, depending on the final civil engineering plans. We would still have 750 linear feet of grass-lined ditches. The Surface Water Utility would have to maintain and operate only the storm systems in the public right-of- way. The future public storm systems in the proposed annexation area, after full build-out, and the estimated cost for maintenance only of these storm systems are shown below in Table 2- Future Public Storm System Infrastructure: TABLE 2�Furi�re Pub�c S�r�,�y�m��' ,.;�; TYPE SIZES NUMBER UNITS UNIT TOTAL AVERAGE OF COST COST ANNUAL FACILITY (Maint. Only) (per 5 years) COST Pipe 12"-36" 7357 linear feet $0.31 $2,280.67 $456.13 Ditch (grass) to 6 ft. deep 750 linear feet $0.91 $682.50 $136.50 Catch Basins Type 1 53 each $10.45 $553.85 $110.77 Catch Basins Type 2 24 each $44.37 $1,064.88 �12�,�, TOTAL: $3,517 $703,-�� 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) No, the proposed boundaries are fine. H:�File Sys\SWA- Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations\Maplewood-East\Maplewood- East-REVU10%.doc\RVtp -3 - � " V General recommendation and comments: None ,.. - t ; ,. ._. G ��_ o�-�' Signatur�: Date: � cc: Mike Stenhouse John Thompson Lys Hornsby H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations\Maplewood-East\Maplewood- East-REVU10%.doc�RVtp -4- . �x ,,,� .-�--- , � / � � t ~� F7,C4�'0� ' �' � •��'� ' � ` � ��° �" .o __ ❑ -- . , a ; ,., � F7,C4-17'+�� . , � ..s..5 ; _.,� , .�. f , , , : .��_ }-- _ .. �� r'�� > �� ' - - i � . . �� , s'„ � � „ . ., > . , ._ ; , . ._'__. .. .,. � . � � r . � ,; �� ' � k 5 � ) . . � . � <:,. >s.... �q, y. ,-1 i 1 « L : � � ..s (1 , . . 33 � " _�,...._ . ...-.._.... '�..-: . , ......_ ' � , k� " �� ... v4fp'�`�� s ., � V �,... ' . _-_.....�...�.:�.s_ .-. ` F7,C4-18� . w � e __ ___ . . x ;e� . � ' 1 '�"',. � _a�_�__. imz_ �, , s,s., «° �.� , � i �, .. � .. * . .:_. . �51.3 ._... � .a. {�a D'._,i � . .. _.5.. w_._,.,r.�,M.. 51s.9 • -�r � .a= i ., � _ _ ! ��e . . :x . . . .. . : .. a ' .. �=5 ' I ,, \`!F�C 3 - �5 0, � ,, ° � ,�`_ . a` � �r -r ...' 3 S ; � F 7, 4-� ��'� �..,,�.� : F�£ �..t � Cj E �,�C r s�" (� t �� . ` � � `� �1 - g �. - . � , � � ; , . , w �� _� _ . : _. , -� ., � � - -,r � `>, .. + _� � 511.2 �:: r 1 lr', 6� _� ..� �. . . � , �{ � � � r � ' `"�� r � .: •;.. ._ /� ,. , r� - , �` s � F7,B4-11 ,� , '\ , � ,«� � � F7,C4- � .. _�._,� r � � _ .. �� r �� :.�- w _� �� ,.i '� i .; �,_� ��w �" �- �r -� . • . _ _, �_� . •: ; ' � �7 -1 �� F7,��3 ,��_d �+� � �.��4;, ��l, r� � � .�,,,� ,� _ �`� . , , - , , � 1 '� �� . .' . . . 0 ` ,� tF7 B4-12 �F7,�4-25 � .�,�c�f� -.. , . �� =. ,�� .�� *� �� y - � . W� � � �', ' �' �''`- ]�� ,x�, ' F7,B4-13,- . ,r �} ti 4� . / � 5 / / ."/ � � �� V '�. �� , . a i t--�.�y.�f.. '' .� �Y�' �jh�� 'Y ill..� �} ,7- � .�V J� �J. . z . � i . . ._i _ �• . � _. `Y1� . , t\ ' .. + .: ..k �-' ,/n �..w .� .' ;�c L7� - ,.. � . �♦ � s b{'�'� "" �- 4c ,��_. .' (`J . ;'. � ✓' ' �� , �,, . ` ' F7,C4-24 .s 7 ` I F7,B5-1 � �� .,� -'-,�.` �+�^,C5_�; " � . � �iti �,9 . �� `�� :..� � , D , r �. t . ,,' . = , ,. _ � ` ��s,, ;: , �+� � �`� � i � �+ � � ` r.>,:�': t a � v�� °� ' .en.a �< t'+�.'g".�� _ ; : � . , _ , � , � , ,, .- _ �., , , #+ r �j+� ,.� 1. > . .415.9 �� . r 7� ��-,1/� :.:�. . �.�� i .,i��. ....: �:..... . � t ��--.` ,M^: . K�-_, .:. , 472.8 . .,., t�e+' � )� �� F7,C5 2 � , _ . , i � 4 �, � � ,� ti�� ,li � , �_, ;� �:,��'�.s � .� _� F"7,C5-?� � � � �� "��r� ;, y � ,� � �� , ,��' '�,' .:� �, � *. .• ,a 1 i � ` � / � ��F7,C5-24 ' � i �, '�► .�'` �. � ��, •.� 4/4.8 � � • f ` ` . _ . . "G �; �� ' ,� t 4� �y .'�t�" ? � � _ � .' . , u -! , , T1�s p y+ _ � �' "� � . ' ' � �� F7,C5-19❑ F � " ^�� `� . �l�. .�� ,� .. �', �; __� � SW.3 C� � i . / >.. .. +r . ....r �J .3 7 y,�,� 1 f ` � � ' . , " , ' _ ,� _ a t . *4 y``{ : r� � «. r. r__ --� , ya\.a . . 4 .. . i �, ._ . . .., . . . . � F 7 C rJ ., su _ n �� ` 1��`` � "+�� \ s;' * .� �A I . . ,. v � . . � . ,: � , ' 1 . �, . �, r � } . , �.. , y' Q�_ _ r � �� i. � •f� , a��'�°� s . ` y�' •4*�, '"', r�, �,, . 4� - ,. . , � . �", < , _ ; d' � .. �., ::. ... �-�e ,. . :, .__ �. .-_ . � ,�y iT tw�- xn is��• . 4�3.e ` . �lr.� � F� 2 F 7.D 5-10 `� -w�4!4. -+� �`•. �� ' «,F7,C�g ., ," � � �,CS-26Q� � r.� 2 . � ,, 'f��a.,�;. a� .�r-.r ;. ' ' �v. '' r x � a � 'r � . :� T #' .-i. - ,n � . .. � .� r. . �•, ' � � - �. � `. ,. � >LE��,�- � "s .� � � .. __. , . •;#`� . r �� . ,., . - . . , ._ �. . . . � , . a � .� � ,_ , ,� r �, ; ( w,. � , t M , �. ,� :_ ,` 3 14 _ , ry� , f ., �. � _ q : �_ . S, ;-.. U `.� �''�� sos �'1 � � „�';'� � . J, y` �'�,.r �\ q 1(R,➢N[s �i �,1 � � � � . _ . ... „ .�.� �`�•. f > �v � "'�` ; F7,C5-9 . �'� �;_�, �x � �f1 C� I _ •a � '�; �t "� . � c . - �,� � ,� ;,_" i C7�. ��. ``�,_� R,. � -� C� , ,� � _ ,� ' . � � �.�.. _ F7,C5-10 --- F7 C 2 s�� '� � � - � � �----- ��r1"' ; _ _ _--_ , ,. _ .. �'" , � � ; �• , � � � , * �� \ <'� t _ ,: . _ . . �. �., ; ; _ �e-------_ i ,� . _ , , <.: , . . . ,. � . � , . � _�- � �.�� 5-3 -�. .,- ,, � �.fc7;C -`.�4 , F7,C _—_. F_ �__ ; F7,D5-5 ; 4 � � � \ ^�', � � = - � 7,A5'-� �' Zi LP��` � �•�< � � ' "'+� � X , :� = �� . , . � �`� , .:�.,._,_, F7�C� -12 F7�C5-11 ; _ _ F7,D5- ��'F7,D5-7 :��'"� . ��c �Ui Cut . .�' �" �r� �. . . ,, � �BS-4 , �� ' �. • ,.,,,,. '�� ,�,�...,� {— _:-- - - � �i� __� _ � . m_ �.�.�n�. .�.�� -'*. »..�.y��_- , k�. �. < _ >. . i --�..��.. ........_ .�c-. � �� ... � � �ETEN. N.>� �!s �� _ ,' ,� -�� - . {� ,: y • „` • s ' ,� , � �7,D5-11 �y - _ -- - - -._ a _ S"i�/ i2''' SCj'�. "`"' - _ _ �. � , � �. . - �w� - ,Il5 12 - s � V❑LUME ,ti ' �� I�°v _ - - _> - -• • �� ,, e � . - . ., K�k. . � . � �.•��' ,�s, n� r1n � . r•, � .�� : ,� � , . _ , � < � � t Q�- � � + ,� ��, .!. '��,�`�� . ,S� y • _� k � �9� /��Py�L�as� /'dUL�GL�C� � 3�CJ'/ . � . r .+,'f'� "� ',,N. �-�` '°z` u�s.z �"f l � � • �„ . � „� � � �.* ",.�",.• " -'! `� .�� . ��t 9 ��-�`—_. � � ,`k• K��. . ,} �. � .� � 4n.5 � � i �_ ,.�+ . � � �` � •. „ e " �.Y. -. ..a a '; r T""�_.�} � " � � "� � 1 � a, �. .,W , - i . � , . �.,�, . � �� , , .,�. �� 3 7 t � ; . . . c"` ��.� �� 'y .;� � `�* �; . �, . '�-, � +�.. �'`� +` � .. . . y `_ � . .« . .*� s t,� y. . � ;aw, ;� �,�� . �,� ,�,.� ,�57 ; :��,,,�. P �vate Dr�ve .� �' -- ' � ,,�,�: ��' �,' . v;, � �.. � : '��y ,� :�,, # '" ,,,� � � '�. M1 ��,9 t' ,-� �y'��`' �-k � ',"' �i . ��,�' i i � s. "' `'"`I . $21 . , .i� j i� Ir' r`� . �' .. � E .. ; i ' �. ' �'. ��.. . R C . - j `�" , x � ' y�. . . ,`i�_. ' 3'Dt.3 ..'. t �'��..Y' ��°�... a. � ..�.� i` �" " .� ___�.,T .. „'.�.`»,_ ._ .._ . ... ..... . #� ; \� � ��.�qy�4��f ,, . � ,.. pa'" �% ^ +'{.r�:.' .�f�,. �"`1` ,t's` '�,d � �'?. ..�\ � ?-'�'"- i . . !' _ y` g-, � _ . .. . ... . • A �; . A � � � �. 4�'�''t � . ..'��i' �A • .. ��'��:w �( � °,+f� �/.. O�� . . . r . . ,� , ., :`�k ., `,'7'"$,. , � a,�� '�. .�' 3 �' "�; , es.a . � .�.��„f, . .. : � \ -�..""!?: � ' � ,��. . v . , . . . �, � �. , i. $ f�, � } a , �..g � < ,, } � 378.! �� .�./ �� si";J � � . �Y' ;#�. j . �� .+�..: �y . . . {�.. . , r---.,...._i �� y*.i'' ... ... �� . `3l6.t� �04.5 ._ + x t. .. •� � } .,� . ,,�� . �� k � ��,,,.� � � � _t�r . '`� ' •g� ,� ';� +9/F , w � ..yr .i t� . �OE.S . I { � .�" �. � ♦ . �� a� r�`��,y, y ' �,� ��y X�`i` v� ' �' � � . ! I ses� soi.i ; i �` ;#� '4 --. � y w ' a; F� ' ( � . .." � � #w :Y � ` ',� f '� y . �� J'�,� ��.�.i � Q� Z`"�� . v • . . •t "�a ��:.'$Mj. � t17.t w� . . � � �. p�( � � y.,�, � ( �. � � � . � .� . / t � . , �.� t ,# ��'j_�� .L '� �'� . "'•T` +'"X..z�� i =�'�l�+'',� •} -, � .� � . �: ._ :sa. ; . � s ,� � , ' • _. �'_ .... a . ,:., > . M . . ,�f�,y • . - _ .. .{�`_'>. � i'r�� ` ",T�.i'� •... .. .y�'fi� � �... f`. �. � ,?. ' wlW+.�,�x''��. � � ..... ,t08.0 - �'t ~�''��Y+,y�'. � r.70.7 . . , �� ,, , . � „�, .� �i . .- �., , . � �� , � ., .t. �/.N �...�y�.� �,,a ' � � � `� � � � '� .� `� �. W ,+*� �6' . .a l}I y�q'+� ` .�/ � . " - R �. �� •I � . . "� � ` � . �;:'_ .3z3.Il.. '.. + .. y .. . � . j .� '^ .:. ...�,a �i "` �T ti .'f �.�� ~ � t � . S91.a �� ~ �`�� '�.5 �4 I �... . .,�� • �i � �� - �' � '�. �t " .$_-�! .:'.. t, �-„ � 4 2 -+ ;�� -' ."lL. I i. . J78.5 , .... , �.'M', ' � ' 1�1. _ , � F,t . ��` fi '1W� � � 'Y+y�`.'°' ,R,�,.v.+ LIi �� ' ��i� r�'� �� . .M" ��.g5�'��'�-_ s.,'�-^.:: ' � . � . . �,:' 4247 �.Yt� - I 1 . �` �,�q -i . 3 : , ` 37fl.7� r . y� .'�. . -w , . . � � ' i � � � �_ � �'s' : � .. k � � (� . i �'':a' �'' . . ,.� . . �� ` G . ' . � �'��a�� 37&0 � `.�' � � . � . ,4-*.�1'�� '/ .,3940 �� . � - .. . ' , � � .' .. . . - :.� .. ' .... � �` � 8 .i' 6 + �.` . � . • � � � �591.2 ;. . 395 5 103.T 71.8� . . .:. rg 3B'l. ...___.-n..�, ^....+......,,.�..: . �Y".-_^-��---:. ...._�.... . .. � i ._ � .� . �� 4 *� . .. . ��' . . :�� &! r .�8. � ��., . ,-:„ °' ' �1 ' . 375.5 376.2 ... 379.0 _ . _:�. . . � . S '.,i .. �`..: .. .. - � � � . . �. � • � . 375.2 " � . �_ ..,:� � ., . . ♦ 372.9 S7S4 ' . 385.5 �.O �.0 . .,.. �. �.J� . �� ,: �v � , . i � q .'#!__- � . • . _ , .. . �.r-� ,. s�. . •.: . . '. . Mr� :��. , �_ . , . ._ � . , ?e5.5 . ih an;,k .,,. � -�_ �.�.�.... . . � . . .. �� . . • � • , T= .� .. 388.0 _J8,.7.6 7 � 5 �, � �'�` S, � '„ � "� �T - .Y ' . - _.�.:�� , <r . 3� . � : . .�... � � 4' +�'��j+.�,�� . S J, .. . ... � . .. � ' �' Ri..iJ . �'Y t_ � � _. pc-..::: . " )�y ' ,. � �,� 4� 38l . �9 0 200 400 375.i 374.Q � t r��- �s��.^, •'-� �• � �- �P.� .t ' . ,�.,s�. _ .. . _ � � 4t19 . ... �f41{.�F .� ,A - e. � � . .a w-; ' . , y ,. . �. .. . .. . . ,� � a . .r'_.� 1 ff} t-,a . . i . . � �` .�-,4..° . � � SBR'�� 1 ' � "�' ,� � - �',_ , t . ' . , R+P"`�...rt �2a S. � '.i::_ . � �... � � 785.0 I � � 411.1 . . :, .:. . �. :� . .+�� o0 r �: . : � o } , : t� _ ,. , , -, a , ' �-� _ . �- . r�� 6 365.2 � � _. e , Y-= ,�,� �..� �..� �. , �� , 1 . 24 � . _ ��`�i�� ., P � Annexation Review Form [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police l��.'�" �ti�l`� Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . PROPOSED MAPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATION Location : Subject parcels are located in the NW 1/4 of 14-23-05 in the Briarwood Hills area. The annexation site, includin�y adjacent street right-of-way, is 26.14 acres �I��s bounded by 152 Ave SE and Maplewood Estates on the�iifi�t, SE 136"'Street on the south, 156�' Avenue Se on the east, and approximate�y SE 134"'Street, if extended, on the north. 156"'Avenue SE is the major north/south community collector in the area, connecting SR 169 to SE 128�' Street. Date Circulated: _March 26, 2004__ Comments Due: A ril 2 2004 General Information Area : Approximately 26.14 acres. Street length : 2,914 linear feet (existing); 3565 linear feet (est. for buildout) Assessed Value : $2,288�000 (existing development) Estimated Population : 20 Current; 195 at Full Development Current Uses Residential : 8 single family units Commercial : N/A Industrial . N/A , Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density Future Uses: : Detached residential units Future Po ulation • 195 ersons 78 housin units . Reviewing Departme Division "�1►a�, d.v"t at �s'�lus 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your departmenddivision? �o� �dw�v�J dt�«$�c� � r JI�'-��-way a/pn �tt �as-�- e�(�e a� �S� p r o�� an,►�xa-f toN �rcy a.bu{��cJ �S 6-f� A�� ,�r 6r rc�Kirc c� ik -I�.� ��C `� M1�� '�'�it Cxts�r�+y 72.--�oT r��f"-o�-�ty �+� ►[•Y�. a�.e�l fa �e'9,Ctc,ohrtae�xe�' an �u�'uf-e�Yc�Jdw� �kl��,� • �rvcw}- roa�c,�a w�d�-i� :�acl �,:vt►+�cv�'�"�kKtt3. o„ 15'�►i�4�M�cS � 5� l36f1► S�frc��a��lf�,�.�t�,c /vo�ou�t �.��cra�r.a �►.+ea da a,�ht�t�l' Cif� a�Rt.•a�►�t S�"vRdards, ��s�„ e.w�+i��+l'er� s��e�,�lks .�� e�ttc.tr nN'-pws��.��.Qr acPo�.a.t�e z1/a J �'Jr�!'��'✓t J�� b�+ I�C S� SMI� �SZAC�./'t-��-„��tr�L:��*.�N��i�,+� a'MI'fGkB-TIUk .Zj'Cu7� "' i + (Over) �, '� t 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? �Irs. �o7e�w�-y w►d{� a�d pav��uwf fk��tcN.CCgJ C,urb �K�,►�.�� s��lewa�ks, and sfrcc�- 1r�k�� '��' Yhtt'� �if}► o��en"�"o� S�"'dr�(B�dS C�o ka'{"GuYvtuf�y .e,�c�:�- o� ar� SPor,a�(�G oti �I'G,.c �or4rdks o� /5�+� �f°rek,,� SE'� S� l��fk $'�f�c£� �.� �51►+d r4vc� �f itEJk�KJ fCG pl�-D�OfCd OT krl.�IG�ftok sr-�'�. ��acl re �+ s� s~h'eG� a•�d aNy n�w �-f'► � �a ,Se►►�� de✓ leP�e•ti'� ��►"- �'t � aw`a wo�rl6e �t,Ft�,e.�.iE u+.ce o.�ir�ew develepr+ee.ti`�a�j6i- �hd��rdk�ly�p�.� 3. Does this proposed annexation represen�a logical extension of services provided by your ow�,evs. department/division? ye5. 1-�-owcv�r as Kaf`�cd 6� �o w r� .�� S w� su��es�' �'ta�' �ic .eas-�- bp�Kdaay o� �Gie pro�os�� a�rke,rat�r.� �� a�('Jks�' 50 �fG�af IS�� A,�e S� t� hd� r��rc�� rn -fzc.� pv��oj�d' 7nkdx�]'�ro�r. 4. Can you provide an estimated rough dollar figure of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? U p�ry��.� I SG� o4vcK�.G "5�� SF /�lo� S-ft-ee�J a nc� ISZKd �(v e�u.ce ,:SE ��K�i� f f,e pro P o f c d �cKn�K d��K a�c a a n«! h��„� a i c c s f we�1'�s►k '�. �nrl.eKa� �►rea ��{�G►e�" a-�— Guw�c.w�- �¢ve(p P n�.G K�" or3�' bK��ou�' �u'4� 6� 3-E'��tz �-'.e�GKsC DT Ck�S 7'/� P�'°ie''�'Y o``�"�''s a,.,��ri �tew dGv�lo�o��K�f'. �Ke�r GoS�S 25ScG�'d�d l,e3r'�, +eaGl`s"f'iKq �KC�J �T �,'��r� �� '►ta�rt�. k.r�e- C.esfS sSSOG��'e� tcs�. �sKsp*.�rf'a�I�k —ve�a'�ea� S�K�J� �tw� �averwcr,��r�u�,s �a�- ��Y �e. trtutwed d y �� Ci�► �.�I�- c�vven�- d�v¢�o/�►��`�' ar►c� af bKi�do��l' �l�duld ao-F 6c a -r�aa�u�! ,��rdm o� -t�i� G-#'y. 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indi te on the attached map.) �e;5. 5�� ad�us�r�,� �e e,as-� baK+�a�y r� �tia-F IS��e 5� IS.�'o�'IK��c(ed, Th�s w�I1 g vo�d "�ra.vr�� a sl�a►t s� �.cCa�t` o�F��6f°�t �vz .S� w1�,� �es�+i,#�+�� ures�it�iort u�1.{�.t 8� Nt7Jo��'�►�'156�, l�1/C'S��I?Or� ,�w.�Sot!'� a�' �,S�o� se�«�e,,.`f- �`v�e ws.a f i��- wc��cr�l+C'!K�q��w'��yi f u h sd��fia� General�'ecommendation and cotlhments: Tlct Tva�csro�`{��coK s'ys�+Ks ��v�5»+� has rto u,kc��•�s , a�l�e� �(r'. t�io�` �'�it�s (�t-opos�a� ,3:�n we�ac��it.; ,oGG�vs. Signature: ��r'�� Date: 3�3j�D 4— Dw�sioN R�v�e�u Ca►a�.qfo� �.- �� _� _._. �w.:..__ -- ----- __—,—�— , � . , r--,_,_,__� _._.__,�___ _—�- ---- �----_...__.____----_� „---__.__� ___�. �i-- —�i G `�'� -ru, 2S 3 ' f� ,• I '� ff 1' �/ `'`�.—�.y.. �� J � �,' •2Z AY � f l' � ' �r '� .� �� 1 f ,% " ,' - ;''� : �, �• • ',, � , �z5 ' ::: ,/' � ` � r ��• r r '� r � I � � � � W ,� ... - - - -�--�- -..__ ._ , . (�v , m.22 N ��' 7 �4 9 3 �0077 I Ij5 � �3 r 89t7 ¢�',�1 S" I � r S. E. �132ND ' ST. � � I.E. 2ND ST. �`;; � „ � 5140 6 ' , .. . ., �. 75 1.5 84 85 86 � _ � a, :�� ^, �. � �' � .2L Ac. 93 : , ;;, : . . s2 � � �I� A� R v C R E� S�T � S �' A�' T $ � z7a�. - �°U�I • I� � I '� 2 3 4 5 6 T 8 9 10 � 11 12 13 � ��0 .2'JAa 38� � 87 83 81 � es�i e �z �zs , 4911, `�- -19124'-- � :=.�-� --��ii25-- -9A - iOAsi - ��30� - c..�.. -- nZSi -- n459 � TRACT F 88 80 �?, PARCEL C Q �0 n �I i2 i3 14 � IS y �, 16 � 17 � 18 � OPEN SPACE 89 �� ;g ''��, ; W I� L ��L � W � R� O O w K ^ �. K —' 79 ee o g � o� i '° � I '� �, 4059 ui S 'OZ i9 g � ��t�,2 � 964 u2 5 iC 5. 41 3Z b 90 �s 3; S.E. 133RD 4 CT. )).S�F�(* 133R D ST. Q 'y ! � '1A � �. ,� '.'� . 92 W � 75 7478 ,�,��, '-Q ---1�99— i .,56h � ��S�F � JC 9439 Ii56+� IWl2 �I38L fl824 9, 93 Z Bst�P a ;� PaRCEL �' 1�1�' � N �o 9, � ^ � � �, 94 � � �'4' I.. � � y �'a�; e e' s '° (�� e, n, �^X ,o f � Q 8 7 � � 6 � � "5 4 � 3 2 - I ' 9 5 Q 7G ' i;a 4 �I-'17 ' � � a ,Z'. � 73 � S P 678063-R 60 ss � � � ss98 J`G s� �� ' t �� G c z� N �: s7 O �o h � �oo ss � ,. � 101 102 66 68 = � �5Z � 65 .� r L��yd Y n 4.06 A c. � �22 A� �� 1 0 � r � 77 64 ♦ 83 �� .22ti 90 `` 62 TRACT �} � '' � 63 QPEN SPACE i Z a'a 2 i Z ACTI '' ' ARK x 61 60 59 5g , �� f �vRNST t�.A� T�vc r i l� � � N S.E. 2ND ST. �. �.� �= - i 9.0� Ac. � �� ,�.d� . ___�� i1 52 53 54 55 56 57 31 �,,,� 30 L , � ��ry 32 29 ��L��,(.��' 47 I 24'7.3 4 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 3 2g �. �„�s z�4 af �sa � (4) (3) (2) (I) S.E. 2ND CT. 27 � '= �° � n 135'7 � •:x ' - - � . � .54Ac. 59 - :�: , 17 �$ �9 2� 2� � 23 24 Zr'J � ' -- SP 4841062499� . . - 27s23 tccLtra�c� t,4.` 274.25 . .7�.T6 -- t50 60 _ � _ — — — s� � C.14 '' ��;�:�� r�,.�:.,,.. . -.- -.. . �:.r_.. -- �. � S.E. 136 TH ST. � 5 E. , _ � 30 59).y8 (600.80 60 n o '.��9 �y� ':: � , C;t Pt„ '��It�k'.'Fa.�: r=,F�' ; .�f•` -�; ' , v' �n � � ,n /36� � d r N) "� ' �? �n � ,... u� ... . . � , ' �, '` . WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a degal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in idendcal form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) � , J�(..p�. �� A iTa ?Co30 `�o, l�5fh `�, K�us Co. �RoP, . 1. �� S�AZ?C� LJA, `��7� 't02# (42�05-qt�$ �. �/�C.Q.� � Ax �T �fi t4-23� � LoT 4 0� K.G, 2. �'�Ho�.t ?�T' Nv �I o 5 p��ee nr,� 3. �D� -b� gilen�. SC�ttD �'!lv 3 D - �S l!5� S� � j �iu� � �i,��(,� ,�N(�- �I�1�� 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. lo. Page 2 of 2 H:\DIVISION.S\P&TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\1096 Notice of Intent.doc\OD � ��.�r� G�.<'�.�r�'Z " Annexation Review Form [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60%Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire � � Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . PROPOSED MAPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATION Location : Subject parcels are located in the NW 1/4 of 14-23-05 in the Briarwood Hills area. The annexation site, includin�y adjacent street right-of-way, is 26.14 acres. It is bounded by 152 Ave SE and Maplewood Estates on the east, SE 136th Street on the south, 156�' Avenue Se on the east, and approximately SE 134th Street, if extended, on the north. 156�'Avenue SE is the major north/south community collector in the area, connecting SR 169 to SE 12gtn Street. Date Circulated: _March 26, 2004_ Comments Due: A ril 2 2004 General Information Area : Approximately 26.14 acres. Street length : 2,914 linear feet (existing); 3565 linear feet (est. for buildout) Assessed Value : $2,288.000 (existing development) Estimated Population : 20 Current; 195 at Full Development Current Uses Residential : 8 single family units Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density Future Uses: : Detached residential units Future Po ulation � 195 ersons 78 housin units . Reviewing Department/Division: ��'(� �� ►�� 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your departmenUdivision? N0 . (Over) �, � 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision � to the area? �ROQUSC^0 h*ME�o�.l 1� Wi�t1�� '[l� t�A�bv .iHlUi CF Ml,�h � �i N6 C�,�n^1 l.f1A-,--� ��'CQ.,�� t�lu, a a . 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your departmentldivision? N� kovU c��- �i.►��w c�4.vi c� —ru t�- �tt.e�,� �, �C r .u�•� �+�1U , 4. Can you provide an estimated rough dollar figure of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? 1V�iC h4Qli(.M�l'�. �u�arc 1f,1.0. �16 �(ba.� u►hC� A��I,��u�f1 C£Ct..��E . 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �6 . General recommendation and comments: � C��i(.� r� 11�J k� A,,ai��u� ►�kz� QE c,��C��N� �.o�'\ l�,G [u-� ��O Bfc�t►cl� I�i�l OGN��o PM�•rC u;ccw�N R u►+Ex�o� 4�q . CfiN�t K �5a� UI•D• �► g� �C�AQ�h�� ru�J��w � UfR'C�. RvAi�.k�iu^t CCfLtI�%ic�. 1Z.L. t,�1.0 - � �10 156� - S� tti��'s� _ 2��- U►� �P��[ �n: '�orr, �1 n��"M An _ 11c�rc�� ( 9'2S�- 255� 9�oC1� Signature: ��-- ��°� ��"210� Date: �+�- �► ��`�" �d�G�/ �t�� ne�v. 5.,�1 a��s 6✓ ` ......... �i✓� �'��%��.�1�'��11 Annexation Review Form [ X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60%Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks � Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . PROPOSED MAPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATfON Location : Subject parcels are located in the NW if4 of 1.4-23-05 in the Briarwood Hills area. The annexation site, includin�q adjacent street right-of-way, is 26.14 acres. It is bounded by 152" Ave SE and Maplewood Estates on the east, SE 136th Street on the south, 156'n Avenue Se on the east, and approximately SE 134th Street, if extended, on the north. 156th Avenue SE is the major north/south community collector in the area, connecting SR 169 to SE 12g`n Street. Date Circulated: _March 26. 2004_ Comments Due: A ril 2 2004 General Information Area : Approximately 26.14 acres. Street length : 2,914 linear feet (existing); 3565 linear feet (est. for buildout) Assessed Value : $2,288j000 (existing development) Estimated Population : 20 Current; 195 at Full Development Current Uses Residential : 8 single family units Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density Future Uses: : Detached residential units Future Po ulation • 195 ersons 78 housin units . Reviewing Department/Division: ,�.�I��-rr%cc.��ii�' 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? � / , � � ,�J� ��T�i.� ��r%!�G- d� �//�,�- �'� 1"G'�_ �i'� �/��d (Over) •+r�rrwr�� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area?� .,f�`dL�� !�-�� T�Ge7��S��i��/�Gl/��i� �� -`��-�.� �}� �✓�o��,�� 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �� 4. Can you provide an estimated rough dollar figure of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any ot er costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? ��C�� G,1f�G�7�\�o I 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �� ti� J� General recommendation and comments: • � "%5� Date: � Signai+ure: . � �,`'�r'/�� Annexation Review Form [ X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60°/a Annexation Petition TO : ��' ' Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . PROPOSED MAPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATION Location : Subject parcels are located in the NW 1/4 of 14-23-05 in the Briarwood Hills area. The annexation site, includin�g adjacent street right-of-way, is 26.14 acres. It is bounded by 152" Ave SE and Maplewood Estates on the east, SE 136th Street on the south, 156tn Avenue Se on the east, and approximately SE 134th Street, if extended, on the north. 156th Avenue SE is the major north/south community collector in the area, connecting SR 169 to SE 12gtn Street. Date Circulated: _March 26, 2004_ Comments Due: A ril 2 2004 General Information Area : Approximately 26.14 acres. Street length : 2,914 linear feet (existing); 3565 linear feet (est. for buildout) Assessed Value : $2,288.000 (existing development) Estimated Population : 20 Current; 195 at Full Development Current Uses Residential : 8 single family units Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density Future Uses: : Detached residential units Future Po ulation � 195 ersons 78 housin units . Reviewing Department/Division: � A��z�' 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? /lfv (Over) 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? �jv 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? ��S 4. Can you provide an estimated rough dollar figure of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? /V� 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �,�/C�: General recommendation and comments: � . 4• � 7 Signature: Date: � � � , 1 ��/r�� /�/��L�S�'�le� � Annexation Review Form [X J 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60%Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility p s Wastewater Utility �. Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning , - ----- ------ FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . PROPOSED MAPLEWOOD EAST ANNEXATION Location : Subject parcels are located in the NW 1/4 of 14-23-05 in the Briarwood Hills area. The annexation site, includin�g adjacent street right-of-way, is 26.14 acres. It is bounded by 152 Ave SE and Maplewood Estates on the east, SE 136th Street on the south, 156tn Avenue Se on the east, and approximately SE 134�' Street, if extended, on the north. 156th Avenue SE is the major north/south community collector in the area, connecting SR 169 to SE 12gtn Street. Date Circulated: _March 26, 2004_ Comments Due: A ril 2 2004 General Information Area : Approximately 26.14 acres. Street length : 2,914 linear feet (existing); 3565 linear feet (est. for buildout) Assessed Value : $2,288.000 (existing development) Estimated Population : 20 Current; 195 at Full Development Current Uses Residential : 8 single family units Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density Future Uses: : Detached residential units Future Po ulation � 195 ersons 78 housin units . Reviewing Department/Division: ��:��-- 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? (Over) �'t ♦ 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? �/ 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your departmenUdivision? �S 4. Can you provide an estimated rough dollar figure of the cost to provide service to this area at current development and at buildout (maintaining existing, city-wide levels of service)? Can you identify any other costs, e.g. one-time capital costs, the City would incur as a result of this annexation? 5. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) General recommendation and comments: � �// � %G 4 � �.t � �GG /C i�, �� /� � f�r�� c l( 4 �I v�-e t�4 1'�a-� f' C`cs (N� / Gi a!/� G„i � �' C !'G¢ /� � h ��f,it�-�li �' e� U� !..-«-�,_ / G 3_�d_�Y Signature: �' Date: � � � � /�,��V � Annexation Review Form SEP � �`� ?2�04 CITyOF [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition UTic�TySRs N oN TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Don Erickson (x6581) Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Wedgewood Lane Annexation (east of Johnson Annexation) Location : This proposed + 12.73 acre annexation area is located east of Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, south of SE 116'h Street on the north and approximately SE 121 St Street, if extended, on the south. The eastern property line is primarily determined by the western edge of an existing wetland that lies to the east. �� Date Circulated: September 2, 2004 Comments Due: eptember 10, 2004 (to Don Erickson, ED SP) __ - _�-_. General Information Area : 12.73 acres Street length : N/A Assessed Value : ±$575,340 (prorated estimate) Estimated Population : 3 Current Uses Residential : 1 dwelling unit Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density Future Uses: : 44 Single Family Dwellings Future Po ulation • 108 residents Reviewing DepartmenUDivision: W A'C�►v l�t�1:�+1 Cu G i►J�E2;�1�i 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �(D 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? Pi�o Po SLro ►r��°� rs us�,-►�^� w r�2, �►sr�� r �i� w.Kr� S�� P�� . A PPU c�� t��i C�ur�c c usD � q� �W UI� a�� cs, �z-r`� C�i h�u�`� , (Over) . r � 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your departmenUdivision? �a� �'PP l,� ��G - �NuE x�c�5 � 1s i►.1 tuD �q� u,t-►rr�- S�s�vy ,�-2E� , 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? 1�1 a T pt?9 l,i�A�l.E . CQ�-�" W O -br q 0 . 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? '�1�� Cff`� 1't�SEri,u�S 'th E (L�6 k'f 'N PdS4 n 6 1�c�D q 0 $ c,.�rt� S�S��"� Uj�-�-�W �{{`1 (j►1i'fS � Rt,l.o wfA �`( S� IAuJ • l�►9 �QO OI��S �cQ'� Cc.�tin,E�t�`� H�rvK A f�-+�a�^S� -ro oPG-�-� uiTrhsv -n�.r' �`I . 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) 1�0 . General recommendation and comments: — �5�9 U cr�*tc �'h c�,�. c�r�� w� �r G(� -�- o�'r�-�� ; �;� �`- Wp�n�. �cv�k1 V►�^S�U�'1 _ I�S afi k�1 IC c c�c o .er q 0 'f�E C,a e�1S�i 1*rc�u� -rv or,•►�1�� —t� ��-srm�1 15606- S� I2� " s� �e,r� �u� q 80�y �-Y•: �o,m �o,�m a 4� - �'�,A►�.h-tsGr✓� Signature: �� `^"" Date: �I� � �{" ��. 1.�u`'�'1 �6A. S�.PEfLvisrp--�� r � , , � �s�r'�C;= ��G�� ;i�;�� y � �%{,�,if t�;=r;,_;;i�;� - NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE - �=�r�-;<�>.^�-r;:�� ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) (10% PETITION— (�E D�LCi��D L.A�pJ�. ANNEXATION) TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF SUBMITTED BY: l.t)EDc��boD tJ��, GI. THE CITY OF RENTON .�DxEss: I S�o- )�o�`,Q-,rC �.�, City Hall, c/o City Clerk �3Eu�-�1u.E, �F� q��- 1055 South Grady Way PHONE: �Fz�'- 7�}7—)72G� �02 Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10°Io) of the assessed value of property within the proposed annexation area which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A legal description (Exhibit A) and map (Exhibit B) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. 1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14330 and 35A.14.340; and, • 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 � . , � � ___ � - --- _i � �,` � � ---- - � : • - - --- , ._._ � - - - - , _._.. ��. � i _..� ..__ __ __.. . � `,O I $ �j /^� � —r��- t — - �� Vl( ( � ' —. `,� � i __ i - j -- _i i _ \ ,_ . : , � . ._ ._. . —�__,�_i��,_ : . t ' __..__....__._. � __ `V . . _ _._ . _ . . � � ..._ . 1 . "."'�_"_�__"_ � i i : . j' _ -_ � . ..._... ._....1 S� ____._ _ ' __ ._. ..__ .�_ . � �. i r � � __ i � _.... _ � ' t : � ( i .. . � __ . � ,. i - -- — -- ---------�-- .�._____.> > ; � � .,.--.. ` . { � � --. \ �.>> . . .. _....-- ;. ; i � � � \ l.. _i , l j, , -1 _..__ _...�_ ..__ � : {_ -��--` ; S� � 14�h ; f ,-- _ ________ ; ; �__ ;_-_--____ �. � � --.--______._�.__.�..�__ ____�___ � _ , ____ , - � ; . � � � ----�—,_�r_____��__ _-- f i l.�.�._.�. - ', ; ► � ' f f �� + i � i � ( -- � '�+?:. � � i ,r. ,, . , � � _.�. ___`._+..._.__.-._----------�. . .,. I I .t r 'Y'+v:'• � I - -- � S� 1 � 7th �� ____ •__--__' �rt �'A� �.��'r�'.'.�'i i�.�i��"�`.�i"i�.:'•� . _ r.,,.��.._...�.............. f'� - � :F�F'. . �. .__.Y_._. , � � � '.tr�i��'.�.��: _ ' 1 `� •,•• � _......_. ih':_.�.'�'.:i..:.•.' ��.7 � ..C"�1 ['".-.....�... _ � Y�e''. _.'` `__. � ��. �� t _ } _�. '�� - --- ___.-_- I � - ` ��nr�e�a��t�n ' c, � �--�' „� � ,,,c-,, !. . ; __ A�re� t �-�- f '1,� � � � __._. ..._._._ - � 1 � -----_-__-_ ;-�. ;� � i I �„ ` - _- -___-�- 1 I , �--�,� � -� ___--�__�___� ___ _____ ---. - � ; � -�.-.--___ ___ - -- ::::.°�-----� -�� _. ; �.,,� _ �'.�.::.� -�-' ;--_ (i � ._.f_.._!-___ +y ..r..�._�..� 1. � � 1 i �."� . ,/ ` . ._ ._i.-,....__ j Kr^..: � I � '• +� ` � --____.._�. � ; cu --=�:�:: _.______.______ sc��E: � �� = 400' .��+ -------___v....__ "'�L. :::< ::� p 2t'10 4�� 80' : .-. � ,, -. _.J ... .:s.;.. ._.-�� .....; -_. ___..._._._"�....._._ '--_.� _"..'.-_ __...—.._.____.._."__ _ 1rJ M� ��—�,. � "--.. � ' _ c`�.� ; Pro�osed Annexat�on , ; �-- i � --- _ ._ _ �- ----.; ____ __ . - __ Ex ibit 8 - - ,- ----__._. _ ; ; � i _ __ � July 2444 y � . WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estale.) ►5�0- ly�'w`Pit�N� �!/00 1. �Ji=l o -� �►�.�►u.�, wR 4800s t oti3 osts4o � ,��xJ r4. �,L� R�N; wEa�� i.�c. C��i�y � �E$oR.A��F �R i N 2. �4429 SE t16�^'s�r �e23oS9�� +E*n�cu�, ✓sa- q 8�s4 �A�WES�r EY' 3 972D N6 12�''�Lt �#.1 I 02��0� 7 K,��tk�-+a�►.�p, c.v F� �l`�t 4. q��SE i Dct+�-P�,�t� K��La�D, �k �8t�34 a�2�0 59 DZ-3 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Page 2 of 2 H:\DIVISION.S\P&TSIPLANNING�ANNEX�10%Notice of Intent(rev's).doc\DE 04/19/04 Proposed Maplewood East Annexation Owner's Name Parcel Address Parcel ID Parcel Parcel Size Levy Number Assessed Code Value f Thomas Needham 13325 156` Ave SE 142305 0935 $251,000 19,166 sf(0.44 ac) 4350 . Bales Ltd Partnershi N/A 142305 9110 $153,000 176,853 sf(4.06 ac) 4350 e Bales Ltd Partnershi N/A 142305 9083 $197,000 176,853 sf(4.06 ac) 4350 � Colon Homes, Inc. N/A 142305 9047 $232,000 392,475 sf(9.01 ac) 4350 Kimberl Clairmont 13407 156` Ave SE 142305 9082 $201,000 9,583 sf(0.22 ac) 4350 Marna Santa Cruz 13425 156 Ave SE 142305 9040 $173,000 9,583 sf(0.22 ac) 4350 Edward Hill, Jr. 13527 156` Ave SE 142305 9059 $214,000 23,522 sf(0.54 ac) 4350 Donald Ehlert 15502 SE 136` St. 142305 9033 $280,000 43,267 sf(0.99 ac) 4350 Frankl Br ant 15406 SE 136` St. 142305 9006 $255,000 43,145 sf(0.99 ac) 4350 Robert Holder 15320 SE 136` St. 142305 9117 $236,000 43,118 sf(0.99 ac) 4350 , ^ Michael Saito N/A 142305 9118 $96,000 42,955 sf(0.99 ac) 4350 TOTALS $2,288,000 980,520 sf(22.51 ac) I N ' L!�� , � � r„� ;> �� _ ��, ,;; �t a_� , �. ,,—, ..-; �,'�� ?��c.� � A , ' �-,a v i -