The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCED Planning File CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 8, 2005 TO: Don Erickson FROM: Sonja J.Fesser�4� t SUBJECT: Lindberg Annexation Legal Description Review Memo,dated August 23,2005 by King County Road Services Division for the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County I have reviewed the above referenced memo regarding comments about the legal description for the Lindberg Annexation and have the following comments: An addition to the legal description for the subject annexation has been incorporated therein, per a request made in the above referenced King County review memo. I made some subjective modifications to the King County legal description addition as written,but said changes do not alter the intent of the addition. As we discussed earlier today, it appears that the above referenced addition to the legal description is redundant and therefore, not really needed. However,the change was made to facilitate the processing of this annexation request. Call me at Ext. 7312 if you have questions. �H:\Fil�Sys\LdVD-Land Subdivisi4n&Surveying Records\L,NJ.3-2Q-Short Pkats\I..INL�BERGb.dae CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: August 9, 2005 TO: Don Erickson �.. �;..��.�,. �_;r��'�_,��.' p,,.�:.�.� •``:�" �, FROM: Sonja J. Fesser !.�",C,r�,l-- SUBJECT: Lindberg Annexation Legal Description Review Memo,dated July 20,2005 by King County Road Services Division for the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced memo regarding comments about the legal description for the Lindberg Annexation and have the following comments: We agree that the Carlo Annexation legal description adopted with City of Renton Ordinance No. 5074 is not the correct version approved by King County staff. Consequently, the Lindberg Annexation legal description leaves islands of unincorporated right-of-way between the Carlo Annexation and the Lindberg Annexation. We understand that Ordinance No. 5074 is bein� rerecarded with King Countv to amend the legal description contained therein to the correct legal description (includes the rights-of-way). This is the preferred way to resolve this matter— Ordinance No. 5074 is in error and needs to be amended, and the Lindberg Annexation legal description is left intact. This should take care of all but one of the review comments noted in the above referenced July 20, 2005 review memo. The Lindberg Annexation legal description has been amended to correct the short plat number noted on Page l,Paragraph 5, Line 3 ("881050"). See the attachment for the corrected legal description. \M:\File Sys\LNQ-Lanc1 Subdivisian&Swveying Records\I.N[,l-?U-Short Plats\LINQBERCr.doc N E 6th S w �� °' W � Q z a� > .� Q 0 � E 4t St O � � th f ,, —� �� w � i..i t�,:�:� c� �� a� a� , > Q ;';. s�: �: � t' -�-� � �.; �, � � � �' E13nd t ' � .. ��^`b �. W ,. � �`,, '� a� �;: � z � Q �°: a� �� > > � � O �' -� cn � °r � � O a � � �� SE 136th St w f � I �' � S 1 9t Li nd berg An nexation o 60o i2oo � Figure 1: Vicinity Map ti� o,{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning 1 • ��oo �O♦ Alex Pietsch,Administraror - - RentOn CI�LI�TIItS ,$ G.Del Rosario �ONTo 17November2004 � Annexation Boundary I Tax ID Name&Address of Acreage Metro Scan Tax Assessed 152305-9207 Cheri L & Karl W Goeres 0.34 355,000 13116 138th Ave SE Renton WA, 98059 152305-9044 Phillip R Lindberg 0.52 125,000 13809 SE 131st St Renton WA, 98059 152305-9206 Paui A Lindberg _ , � 0.88 144,000 13832 SE 131st St Renton WA, 980,59 152305-9205 Paul A Lindberg 2.04 295,000 13836 SE 131 st St . Renton WA, 98059 152305-9222 Beth Shewchuk 1.38 207,000 13844 SE 131st St . Renton WA, 980,59 ' 152305-9223 Timothy J Lindberg 0.85 212,000 13845 SE 131 st St ` " ' Renton WA, 98059 ' 152305-9048 Ricardo Beltran � � • ~ 1.19 140,000 2108 Blaine SE Renton WA, 98055 152305-9037 Charles Hargraves 0.68 244,000 13820 SE 132nd St Renton WA, 98059 152305-9082 Fredrick L&Judy R Busch 1.5 407,000 13918 SE 132nd St Renton WA, 98059 152305-9177 Edward C & Cynthia Chaussee 0.34 235,000 13120 138th Ave SE Renton WA, 98059 Tota!Acreape 9.72 2,364,000 Total Acreqe Total Tax Assessed � � ^ s �-o�-oog C;:�"?� i�3�-: -� �_�- :i..y...?i#�'� ;f. � -��.• E .<1 L3 n i.`:.f NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS �3, �'F��- _- - _ -��. ._ ._ ,-_�_. UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) 10% PETITION- '�- t��l��-►'� ANNEXATION TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF SUBr�rrrED BY: �? M L�`'� �`�" `� � THE CITY OF RENTON ADDRESS: �P. c� . J3;�x Z � to(�, City Hall, c/o City Clerk �Z e��-, In/4 9�05� 1055 South Grady Way PHONE: Z�c„-�9 0 •3�� Renton, WA 98055 - The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) of the assessed value of property within the proposed annexation area which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to cornmence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The temtory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A legal description (Exhibit A) and map (Exhibit B) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. 1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept,reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) �o�� / �,�,1 /� d��3C� s� 1..�!�" .��,�j,� 1. 7� l`�� i4, l,i � /c��"� 4I1�- `'l�Ci� 2. 10�Z �� /.��:'�.s� 1�3� - ��,ri t�t� e� ��t� �,� r� . �..� �� - Q�.�i 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. lo. Page 2 of 2 H:\DIVISION.S�P&TS\PLANNiNGWNNFJC�10%Notice of Intent(rev's).doc\DE 04/19/04 �. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION SITE Tax ID Legal Description 152305-9207 STR 152305 TAXLOT 207 W 149.29 FT OF E 479.29 FT OF N 99FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 152305-9044 STR 152305 TAXLOT 44PP ACT 39923958 MOBILE HOME LOT 3 KCSP 676075 REC AF#7701190691 SD PLAT 152305-9206 STR152305 TAXLOT 206 PP ACT 39924055 MOBILE HOME LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 152305-9205 STR 152305 TAXLOT 205 LOT 2 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 8303160822 SD SHORT PLAT DAF 152305-9222 STR 152305 TAXLOT 222 PP ACT 39924071 MOBILE HOME LOT 3 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 152305-9223 STR 152305 TAXLOT 223 LOT 223 LOT 4 LESS RD OF KC SHORT PLAT#882065 RECORDING NO 830316-0822 SD SHORT 152305-9037 STR 152305 TAXLOT 37 S 99 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SD SEC LESS E 330 FT& LESS 152305-9082 STR 152305 TAXLOT 82 E 330 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS C/M RGTS 152305-9177 STR 152305 TAXLOT 177 N 99 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS E 479.29 FT LESS W 20 FT 152305-9048 LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 881050 RECORDING NO 8201220536 SD PLAT DAF-POR OF S 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF NE1/4LYNOFSE132NDSTLESSE30FT LESS W 30 FT ' ' i � ` �' �� +p � t �. � . 1 ' . j � .�„+".,�,- 1 � ,, � �r h.. ^' �YJ 1 � � Z ' ` , I – � . � �I ` ' _ � *�4 �j�� + . � � _.e"^- n „ '%� � ^r,.w 4 1..,.... � ,� ! � j T � � � �� . �,. . ,i � » f . � ...�,, t a 5 r•--� � '��►� �i�� , , � I .�,. .... . .� . � w r e.. , ' .er+r.� i.. � �,• �y, r K• v�w , kY k i{�N/N1YM � �Wnt• –�•�M w• 4 y � �–�! Y�► „'pp fiV�Yb) �•�� : �� o � �- { --��,� .� ,�� ,� i� t�i`�' '+� �' � �t o,� :� ..n � �-i�'I�� 4 L�. � � ~ t �� I +� �J � j � �m �� 4� �� s r , .-x. Y- -_ . � �—� �� ... �-� . � � � � �. ... �__.� _,., , a i . ... �,�,��.. A�e . -�,� . �,, , � ; a F � a� .M �� _Y! II��II � �� '�r/a { �� ' i�� . � !A , � x � Q . � � -�; f--; � °° '� _i___;° � � " . �, �... _M . '+"W �r �w�,Q . YI MON r.r w r sr M irl 7f 7N11f/tN r.►w • '—.w.w �. �.,y,w � r �� /1 Z �.� vr� 1 . _�.�_ 'il.7it" ra� • i Q !,} ��i '•'�,e § +�a�g�' � • :� ' : 1 :'s 1 i .I F- «,.. � - _',-�,r.^_-___� ► � + 4 q'+a �►� � � _ � �1 1 o t �e� I " I h� � �� i. � +�:a �� e �� : �" : �k � � � , . � u�� • ,, \� � t. w..�, a � a ti : - , ' � � .�. ...__.}-•-•-•----•---, � , i� WOH 0 � i � 3 :.� i; � " .t� � �, ,4 „�a� » � � A � . �t � 1 �R .. � � � � � �, r1� t *► : �i 1! 2� t � ��j i `•\ - �,>• '� �`, e� i .� �� , ' �� I . •• -•--�'�----�--•—�;— • . � _� '� '•'�' �i . . � �._ . —•�--�• ------- a� � � � i a , _ �_... . ------ t — - --�-- �r�r....�..._. 3r —-- ---- - _r� » sa�o- .«.> � �� _�----��. �. 7` �e "-"' "' •; -' ..... __ . ' ,t � M a 1 �� . y,� �s� �0' � . � • � � i ' � � � I I � � � w $� � --�- �. --� � , . �3 ( � �,A�' "�, . � _ �� '}m i � �� —.:_L_�_ � � � ,� c gI . _� - � `— - � ..� 's,�; � � I �''Q� � I � 1 _� ' � � �� Z �� - �� s � '�� I - . � '� �o(��-- � � � , � � � � � , . M � � , �MV++r J M. !\ M 4t w KY)� I�[Y)i � � _� � � � �� 3� 3/tI K w wr w �� • � �� 0 ;�� _�,� i s� .O :� a pd i� t� '�� `,� , ^ ' � � `s j ' I � � ' , � ��a " """ '+} � -. i ' ► I � ~ �I � � ,�) a e �o � s , 3 , � , � ; �-- � � a�r--- a� A�� . '�;o�� . g �� .�� , _�M_ .�. �O� � . � Y�.,,� ��, � . . ---�a O ...:.�w - =�iI { �, _ . " 1 �•1 ��a �+(� w� a) � r <�t. "� • � � �` ., � S 's S� , � vF � � . 'R�M��` � _ � _ ' • y,' ' � f °'.°' ' `� � �— �i� � � . � F� • ' I �� + �� -�� I � � , ' � a '�.�` ; �Ir�wW . �� - ... � _ - ,,:.� --,tiphs-=-- .. '°' a'� . � ; .�� ,. ,;�, ....'+."'.� w!��> ``� S�'' �a A �i �i, �' � t� • x y i � , . a , +1� �' � i ,.w,�.�, -- ,j � • � � l �._�._.____�� _ � �� y� R� r � �. ; rt� '.. , , ' . � ' . �EC��C� � � AUG 2 3 2��5 Kin Count �'►�B°""°g�r R�d`�� Y g�ard For 1Gng Go. Road Services Division Department of Transportation KSC-TR-0231 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 98104-3856 August 23, 2005 Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Boundary Review Board YES-BR-0220 RE: City of Renton—Lindberg Annexation (File 2202� Dear Ms. Blauman: Thank you for the opportunity to review the revised legal description for the proposed Lindberg Annexation to the City of Renton and corrected Ordinance for the Carlo Annexation to the City of Renton, transmitted with your August 3, 2005 letter. Staff has reviewed the corrected Carlo Annexation, City of Renton Ordinance 5074, dated July 26, 2005, and found it to be satisfactory and complete. Staff has reviewed the enclosed revised legal description for the Lindberg Annexation and found it to be unsatisfactory. There is an island of right-of-way that staff addressed in their response dated July 20, 2005, which was not included in this revision. The area of concern is located on the southeast corner of the 140th Avenue SE and SE 132nd Street intersection and is described as follows: Please add another paragraph reading"TOGETHER WITH a portion of right-of-way with a boundary described as follows: Starting in the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter(1/4) of the Northeast quarter(1/4) of said Section 15, Then S 88°21'10" E 62 feet, thence S 0°31'45" W 30 feet to THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence N 88°21'10 W 20 feet, thence S 0°31'45" W 20 feet, thence northeast 31.81 feet along a tangential curve, with a radius of 20 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This annexation does not include a portion of a County park. �.�,=ozM • w a Lenora Blauman August 22, 2005 Page 2 If you have any questions, please contact Nicole Keller, Vacations and Boundaries Engineer, at 206-296-3731, or via e-mail at Road.R/Wvacations@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, �' t`�� ,�C� � ��'�., /`� n�-�� .t� --��t,t Lydia Rey lds-Jones Manager Project Support Services LRJ:NK:mr Enclosures cc: Paulette Norman, P.E., County Road Engineer, Road Services Division Anne Noris, Clerk of the King County Council (w/enclosures) Nic�le Keller, Engineer II, Engineering Services Section, Roads Services Division � , � ' . AUG-11-2�F15 i9=11 �ii'r OF RENTOPl µ�5 d3G 7�ee r.0��e�9 LINDBERG ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Southeast quarter{1/4)of the Northeast quarter{1/4)of the Northwest quarter(1/4) of Section 15,Township 23 North,Range S 8ast,W,M.,King County,Washington; EXCEPT the north I86,1 S feet of the west 234 feet thereof;�nd EXCEPT that portion for � Road (138`h Avenue SE); TOGBTHER WITH Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 881050, as recorded under King County Rec. No. 8201220536,records of King County, DVashington,in the Northwest quarter(l/4)of the Northeast quarter(114j or said Seccion 1�;and TOGETHER WTTH the south !00 feet of the west 190 feet of the north half(112}of the Southwest quarter(1i4}oi tne ivarthwesc quarter�ii4}oi the lvorcheast quar[er�li�t'j of s�id Sectian 15;and TOGETHER WTTH the east 30 feet of the west 220 feet of the south 30 feet of said subdivision; and TOGETHER WITH that porti4n of 140`�'Ave SE in the south h�ilf(1/2)of the Southwest quarter(1/4)of the Northwes[quarter(1/4)of the Nartheast quarter(1/4)of said Section 15;and TOGETHER WITH that por[ion of SE 132"d Street in said subdivision, lying . westerly of the east line of said Lo[ 1 of King County Short Plat No. 881050 extended southerly, [o the south Iine of said subdivision; and TOGETHER WITH tha�portion of SE 132"�Street in the Southwest quarter(1l4)of the Northeast quarter(I/4)of said Section 15, lying westerly of the east line of said Lot i of King County Sh�rt Plat No. 881050 extended southerly,to the southerly right-of-way margin of SE 132"d Street, and(ying easterly of the easterly right-of-way mazgin of 14U`" Ave SE extended northerly, to the north line of said subdivision. I � 1 � 4 / :; ' �.. ,:1 �'��11� �1�•%�i i�i; 'f.�.+'^ F �YI f •�r"� " y��' w �"',+. i •'y�� . ' . .�u�'i. , `�}�. "✓� ( �� `@' :N9Pi G„R' rW'.,k`i•�a'�� . .:nR.!� 5�1 i��'t"i �F3'� ,4:y r'�,; - - �, .. �.. . : ._ .. ,r.,:` ��;i.�i ?!.\ .� •j;. 'y 1 � r��,T,.%i',� � . ._ .„ ... . . E:; � . . .� . ,_ .. �;.. :. .. . ` ,. .. ..� . . . .' ,:.. . ',�, . .. .'i!' - . , •;.. . `�'..,. `.�li� tii.`:,�, '`;`' �',i:� _ .., . ... ..:';-C�'?;;`, . :... '�."t_. _"�'.', ._::i - �. �` 7 ..: . . , .�.. . . ...,it._, ';i;CC. _"��i:%i;:...__?l'i:ii'= August 3, 2005 'TO: Lydia Reynolds-Jones Department of Transpoitation Manager, Project Support Services KS GTR-0231 FROM: Lenora Blauman, Executive Secretary SUBJECT: REVIEW OF REVISED LEGAL DFSCRIP'TION File No. 2166 - City of Renton - Carlo Annexation File No. 2202 - City of Renton - Lindberg Annexation Ordinance No. 5074, dated May 24, 2004 was improperly filed with the Carlo Annexation. This Ordinance has since been cori•ected effective: July 26, 2005. It has been filed with File No. 2166 - City oC Rento�z - Carlo Annexation. With the correction to the Carlo Annexation Ordinance the legal descripiion filed with File No. 2202 - City of Renton- Lindberg Arinexation within the Notice of Intention is now hopefully correct. Your assistance in correcting lega( descriptions, in order to avoid futurc difficulties, is gready appreciated. Enclosure: City of Renton Ordinance 5074, dated May 24, 2004, Carlo Arulexation City of Renton Ordinance 5074, dated July 2b, 2005 � cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council (w/o enclosures) FORNi 9 -� Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Building, Roorn 402, 400 Yesler Wrty, 5er�ttle, WA 98104 Phorle: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • ltttp://wzvzv.rnetrokc.gov/nrtriexrrtiorrs August 23, 2005 City of Renton Attn: Don Erickson, AICP Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: REQUEST FOR REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION File No. 2202—City of Renton—Lindberg Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: Enclosed please find a copy of the letter from King County Engineering staff regarding the legal description submitted as part of the above Notice of Intention. If you are in agreement with the corrections and suggestions made in the letter, please submit a revised legal description to our office as soon as possible. The corrected legal description must be used on all future documents related to this proposal. We suggest you direct any questions concerning the County Engineering recommendations to Nicole Keller, Road Services Division, at 206-296-3731. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Enclosure: Letter from King County Road Services Division dated August 23, 2005 cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council (w/o enclosures) Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services(w/o enclosures) FORM 8 � ,� Q �� - � - _ __� � -� � � �- o � � � \� O � � T? 4t St r - ' ; , -� -T - - 1 , � i - � ' � -� �� - i w w � - c� � a� a� � > r—� --- � , �--� --� � L -� - �' E13nd �t -� -�- , , � � � , , \ �{ �'� �-► � - - - - - __�� - �-� i � � � ri � � Q .� , o ; � � � �t- d- � �� ' � � �� I �— � I S E1 36th � —� � , - � �, � _ � � � - Lindberg Annexation { �� . - � 0 40o soo R-8 Zoning Map ��Y oT Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Shategic Planning - - Refit011 Clty LIf111tS 1 • 'T V o0 � � � Alex Pietsch,Administrator Annexation Boundary G.Del Rosazio �FNTO� IS September2005 R-8 Zoning � �� Q ;- � - � - .� , i o � -! - ,l o � - - 4t O � � st � � -�i-� , _ -- � � '� � � � _ -,� �� ! , ' � � ! �_ 1 � � ��_ -►� ; i w �w r—� � -- � � a� a� I > �--� - I � � -- -+� -� � �- -� — �— E13nd t � - � ��,� �� '� W �----- - � -� � � ----- -- -� - , � ; � ; c.r� � _� � Q . i Q � -- � � — ' Q --- � � -�--� . O --� , ,� � � , � �- � � `� i� r— 1. � ' ' SE 136th � � , w 4— Lindberg Annexation o 40o goo Vicinity Map ��Y �,� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning - - R@f1t011 CItY LIf111tS 1 . 417�0 �� Alex Pietsch,Administrator Annexation Boundary �� G.Del Rosario ��NT�� 5 September2005 R-8 Zoning - Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Building, Roorn 402, 400 Yesler Wai�, Seczttle, WA 98104 Pliorie: (206) 296-6800 • Fnx: (206) 296-6803 • lrttp:%/zvzvzo.metroke.gov/nririexntioris September 22, 2005 City of Renton Attn: Don Erickson, AICP Senior Plamler 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: CLOSING LETTER FOR COMPLETED ACTION - File No. 2202 - City of Renton - Lindberg Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: We are writing to advise you that the Boundary Review Board has now completed the required Evaluation, as specified in RCW 36.93, for the above-referenced proposed action (filed with the Board effective: July 21, 2005. The Boundary Review Board also provided a 45-day public review period July 21, 2005 - September 21, 2005, as prescribed by RCW 36.93. The Board received no request for a public hearing of this proposed action during the public review period. The Boundary Review Board, therefore, hereby deems this proposed action approved effective: September 22, 2005. Final approval of the proposed action is also subject to the following actions, where applicable: 1. Sewer and Water District actions and some other actions are also subject to approval by the Metropolitan King County Council. If the Council makes changes to the proposal, the Board may then be required to hold a public hearing. 2. Filing with King County of franchise application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of this letter. 3. Filing with King County of permit application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of this letter. 4. Fulfillment of all other statutory requirements and/or procedures specified in your Notice of Intention. Page two continued, September 22, 2005 Form 13 5. Notification in writing of your intended effective date of annexation. This notification should be provided as early as possible. Please send this information to Michael Thomas, Bank of America Tower, King County Office of Management and Budget, 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3200, Seattle, Washington 98104, and 6. Filing with King County Council of: (1) one certified copy of final resolution or ordinance accomplishing this proposed action; and (2) a copy of this letter. This document should be filed with the Clerk of the Council (Attn: Anne Noris), King County Courthouse, Room 1025, Seattle, Washington 98104 If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact our office at 206-296- 6800. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council Bill Huennekens Records and Elections Division Debra Clark, Department of Assessment Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services King County "911" Program Paul Reitenbach, Department of Development & Environmental Services Michael Thomas, Office of Management and Budget -� Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler B��ildirig, Roorrr 402, 400 Yesler Way, Senttle, WA 98104 Plior�e: (206) 296-6800 • Fnx: (206)296-6803 • {tttp://zuzvzv.metrokc.gov/r�rtriexatiorrs September 21, 2005 City of Renton Attn: Don Erickson, AICP Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING File No. 2202 - City of Renton - Lindberg Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: We have received approval from King County engineering staff of the legal description for the above-referenced Notice of Intention. The Notice of Intention is now considered complete and has been officially filed effective: September 21, 2005. Therefore, the end of the forty-five day period allowed for invoking the Board's jurisdiction and requesting a public hearing has passed. You will be advised of any further changes in the status of the Notice before the Board. Please be aware that any future final ordinance or resolution on the proposed action must incorporate the legal description approved by King County engineering staff, including any revisions made in response to the engineering staff review. Sincerely, Lenora Blaum n Executive Secretary cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services Debra Clark, Department of Assessments Bill Huennekens, Records and Election Division Paul Reitenbach, Department of Development and Environmental Services Michael Thomas, Office Management and Budget FORM 12 -� Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Bitilding, Room 402, 400 Yesler Way, Serrttle, WA 98104 Phorie: (206) 296-6800 • Fnx: (206)296-6803 • http://zvww.metroke.gov/arrrle.rntiofts 22 September 2005 Donald K. Erickson City of Renton Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: Lindberg Annexation (Boundary Review Board File No. 2202) Dear Mr. Erickson: On behalf of the Boundary Review Board, I am writing to confirm the receipt of corrections to the legal description that you have prepared pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120 for the above-referenced file. These materials have been transmitted to King County Engineering Services Department for review and action. The Board anticipates the customary comprehensive and timely response from the Engineering Department. Immediately following approval of the legal description by the Engineering Department staff, the Board will be pleased to close the Lindberg Annexation file. The Board and County Engineering Department representatives share your interest in proceeding efficiently and promptly in the review of files. We recognize and appreciate the fact that City of Renton representatives bring excellent qualifications to the preparation of Notices of Intention to the Boundary Review Board. The Boundary Review Board finds that the County Engineering Department staff also brings excellent qualifications to their essential task of ensuring the accurate legal description of properties under consideration for transfer of jurisdiction. The Board understands that the Engineering Department routinely endeavors to review services and to consider whether new methods would enhance services. In that vein, perhaps, the Engineering Department staff may find value in some of your positive suggestions. We anticipate that the Engineering Department will contact you in the event that further dialogue would be of mutual benefit. The Board believes, as vrell, that City of �2er„on officials appreciate the fact that complet� and accurate legal descriptions are fundamental to the success of applications to create or change municipal boundaries. As such, the Board looks forward to continuing to provide services to the City of Renton that both achieve statutory requirements and effectively address the welfare of our communities. If you have questions or would like additional information, you are welcome to contact Lenora Blauman, Executive Secretary to the Boundary Review Board at 206-296-6800. Si�ly, � Sincerely, J� � 1 �� ✓�-�-�-�--� � Jud Tessa`ndore Lenora Blauman, Y Chair Executive Secre#ary Cc: Dave Christensen Rick Brater—King County Engineering Services . f q., ti�Y o City of Renton � s: ,� � DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, � NEIGHBORHOODS, and STRATEGIC PLANNING '� �� Sixth Floor �NT 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 www.ci.renton.wa.us Date: 08/11/2005 TO: Lenora Blauman FROM: Don Erickson, AICP Executive Secreteary Office of Strategic Planning Wash. State Boundary ENDSP Department Review Board for King City of Renton County Phone: (206) 296-6801 Phone: (425) 430-6581 Fax Phone; (206) 296-6803 Fax Phone: (425) 430-7300 ISUBJECT: Revised Legal Descriptions I Number of pages including cover sheet 2 REMARKS: ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent ❑ Reply ❑ Please � For your be mailed ASAP Comment review Lenora, Attached are the revised legal descriptions you requested a week or so ago. If you have questions please call Dave Christensen at 425-430-7212 in my absence. Thank y9u. �-- RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE _ �s , ��y � ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, U �s � NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC � ,�u ' ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT ��N�o� M E M O R A N D U M DATE: August 9, 2005 TO: Dave Christense FROM: Don Erickson SUBJECT: Annexation Legals Administrative Corrections Dave, I have recently received the attached requests for corrections from Lenora Blauman, Executive Secretary of the BRB, who gets them from Lydia Reynolds-Jones in the County Road Services Division who checks them for the County. Could you please have Sonja or Robert take a look at these and get their corrections (assuming they agree)back to me as soon as possible? Apparently, the BRB stops the process until these matters get resolved to their satisfaction. Thanks in advance for your assistance. �/`�f�� / �� .��G��`,�,,� �� -�''}-`�"� ��:,� �''��,'-Q v�,s� � r-�� ...-�M,�,�-,i�' ' �'� �Co ��,tc,� �;�,�,� �ra �`�.�. Go � document4 •� i � RECEtV�D King County JUl 2 Road Services Division 5 20�5 Department of Transportation WA State Bound Review KSC-TR-0231 Board For Ki g Co. 201 South Jackson Street Seattle,WA 98104-3856 July 20, 2005 Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Boundary Review Board YES-BR-0220 RE: Citv of Renton—Lindberg Annexation(File 2202) Dear Ms. Blauman: Thank you for the opportunity to review the legal description for the proposed Lindberg Annexation to the City of Renton transmitted with your June 22, 2005 letter. Staff has reviewed the enclosed legal description and found it to be unsatisfactorv. Staff found that the adjacent boundary of a previous annexation ordinance, City of Renton— Carlo Annexation(BRB File 2166), is not depicted as adopted in approved City Ordinance 5074. Therefore, the proposed Lindberg Annexation leaves islands of unincorporated rights-of-way that need to be included in the annexation. The Carlo Annexation was previously reviewed and approved by staff on March 8, 2004. However, the legal description adopted with Ordinance 50�4 is not the same as the version approved by staff. Furthermore, the Carlo Annexation area highlighted on the assessor's map accompanying this proposal is similarly inconsistent with Ordinance 5074. While Ordinance 5074 could be amended to include all rights-of-way that were left out, staff recommends simply revising the proposed Lindberg Annexation to include said rights-of-way. With the several minor changes and additions of previously excluded rights-of-way, listed below, this legal description will be complete and satisfactory. Page l, Paragraph 5, Line 3, where it says "King County Short Plat No. 8201220536" it should read "King County Short Plat No. 881050" Please add another paragraph reading "TOGETHER WITH a portion of right-of-way with a boundary described as follows: Starting in the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter (1/4) of the Northeast quarter(1/4) of said Section 15, Then S 88°21'10" E 62 feet, thence S 0°31'45" W 30 feet to THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence N 88°21'10 W 20 feet, thence S 0°31'45" W 20 feet, thence northeast 31.81 �a.�,=o>w . � - ' LenoYa Blauman July 20, 2005 Page 2 feet along a tangential curve,with a radius of 20 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Please add the following, which were excluded from Ordinance 5074: "TOGETHER WITH the east 30 feet of the south half(1/2)of the north half(1/2) of the southwest quarter(1/4) of the southeast quarter(1/4) of the northwest quarter (1/4) of said Section 15; and" "TOGETHER WITH the west 42 feet of the southwest quarter(1/4) of the northeast quarter(1/4)of said Section 15; LESS that portion lying southerly of the south line of said north half(1/2) of the southeast quarter(1/4) of the southeast quarter(1/4) of the northwest quarter(1/4) of said Section 15 extended easterly across 140th Avenue SE, to a point on the west line of Lot 49 of Puget Colony Homes, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 86 of Plats, Page 59, records of King Counry, Washington; and" "TOGETHER WITH the portion of street known as 138th Avenue SE lying in the southeast quarter(1/4)of the northeast quarter(1/4) of the northwest quarter(1/4) of said Section 15, said street varying in width from 20 feet to 30 feet and back to 20 feet." This annexation does not include a portion of a County park. If you have any questions, please contact Nicole Keller, Vacations and Boundaries Engineer, at 206-296-3731, or via e-mail at Road.R/Wvacations@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, ��-� ��- i�� L dia Reynol s-Jones Manager Project Support Services LRJ:NK:mr Enclosures cc: Paulette Norman, P.E., County Road Engineer, Road Services Division Anne Noris, Clerk of the King County Council (w/enclosures) Nicole Keller, Engineer II, Engineering Services Section, Road Services Division �� . - Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Bicildirig, Room 402, 400 Yesler Wn�, Senttle, WA 98104 Phofie: (206)296-6800 • Fnx: (206)296-6803 • http://wwzv.rrretrokc.gov/n�lriexntioris June 30, 2005 City of Renton Attn: Don Erickson, AICP Senior Planner 1Q55 S�uth Grady Renton, WA 98055 RE: SUMMARY File No. 2202 - City of Renton - Lindberg Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: Enclosed is the Summary prepared by Boundary Review Board staff for the above-referenced Notice of Intention. The Summary will be sent to the Boundary Review Board members, along with the Notice of Intention, as part of the agenda packet for the next regular monthly Board meeting. If you see any corrections or clarifications which should be made in the Summary, I would appreciate hearing from you at (206) 296-6801. Sincerely, Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Enclosure: Summary FORM 11 SUMMARY FILE NO. 2202 Thomas Guide Map No. 656 Date Received: 06/21/05 Date Distributed: 06/22/05 ENTITY City of Renton Date Filed: ACTION Petition for Land Annexation Expiration 45 Days: 08/04/05 TITLE Lindberg Annexation Board Meeting: 07/14/05 Location The site is located on the southeast side of the City of Renton. The southern and western boundaries of the site abut the existing City of Renton. The northern boundary of the site is generally formed by SE 131�` Street (if extended). The western boundary is formed by 138�h Avenue SE. The eastern boundary is generally formed by 142"d avenue SE (if extended). The southern boundary is formed by SE 132nd Street. Land Area Approximately 9.72 acres Land Use Existinct: Nine single-family homes. Estimated Future: There is an application to subdivide Lindberg to permit up to 63 total dwelling units. Population Existinp: Approximately 23 persons Estimated Future: Approximately 158 total persons Assessed Valuation $2,364,000. County Comprehensive Plan Designation Urban Residential Use (4— 12 dwelling units per gross acre) County Zoning R-4(4 dwelling units per gross acre) City Comprehensive Plan Residential Use -Moderate-Density City Zoning Residential Use - R-8 (Maximum 8 dwelling units per net acre) District Comprehensive Plan City of Renton Comprehensive Water&Sewer District Plan District Franchise No franchise is required. Urban Growth Area(UGA) The site is located within the Urban Growth Area as identified under the ' State Growth Management Act, King County Comprehensive Plan and City of Renton Comprehensive Plan SEPA Declaration The proposed annexation is exempt from SEPA pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.222 ENTITIES/AGENCIES NOTIFIED: King County Council Member(s) Reagan Dunn; David Irons; Dwight Pelz King County: Clerk of Council, Department of Assessments, Fire Marshal, Health Division, State Department of Ecology, Puget Sound Regional Council, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro) Cities: Not Applicable Fire Districts: King County Fire Protection District No. 25; City of Renton Fire Department Water Districts: King County Water District No. 90; City of Renton Water Utilities Department Sewer Districts: City of Renton Sewer Department School Districts: Renton School District No. 403 . , s SUMMARY(File No. 2202) The City of Renton proposes the annexation of approximately 9.72 acres, known as the Lindberg Annexation. This annexation was proposed under the 60% petition method, pursuant to RCW 35A.14. Renton City Council adopted the petition for annexation in May of 2005. The site is located on the southeast side of the City of Renton. The southern and western boundaries of the site abut the existing City of Renton. The northern boundary of the site is generally formed by SE 131St Street (if extended). The western boundary is formed by 138th Avenue SE. The eastern boundar�is generally formed by 142�d avenue SE (if extended). The southern boundary is formed by SE 132" Street. The unincorporated area is included in the "Annexation ElemenY' of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and is located within the Renton Potential Annexation Area. The proposed action is consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies addressing annexation, including those provisions which call for inclusion of urban areas within the City together with protection of and provision of services to incorporated areas (e.g., LU-1; LU 37.3; LU-37.5; LU-36; LU-41, and LU-42). The Lindberg property owners are seeking annexation in order to develop properties under City of Renton regulations and to receive public services (e.g., sewer services)from Renton. Presentiy the area includes approximately nine single-family residences. The City of Renton proposes residential zoning at R-8 (up to 8 dwelling units per net acre) in order to achieve urban densities and efficiencies consistent with adopted Countywide goals and City policies for urban growth. At full development, Lindberg would include a total of approximately 63 homes. The City of Renton has planned for growth at this level of urban density and has established standards to guide ongoing uses and new development on the Lindberg properties following annexation. More specifically, the City of Renton is prepared to provide development review based upon local standards and applicable King County guidelines. Similarly, the City will provide environmental review to the annexation area based upon local, regional and state regulations for protection of environmentally sensitive areas (e.g., sloped terrain, vegetated areas). The City of Renton can directly provide (or contract for) urban services to the area. For example, upon annexation, the Lindberg Area will receive police services, fire services and emergency medical services. The City will also provide for sewer service, and storm water management. King County Water District No. 90 will continue to provide water service to the Lindberg Annexation Area. City and County library facilities, law and justice facilities, and parks and recreation facilities (slated for improvements)would be available to the community. Children would attend schools in Renton School District No. 403. The City of Renton reports that the proposed annexation conforms to the State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.) For example, the annexation is supported by RCW 36.70.20, which requires community planning goals, for urban growth, services and infrastructure, and environmental preservation. Additionally, the appli�ation reportedly is consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (1), encouraging development in urban areas where there are adequate public services. It is also consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (12), which calls for public services to support permitted development. Annexation would also permit urban growth — and protection of environmentally sensitive areas — as envisioned in the Growth Management Act. Further, the Lindberg Annexation is reported to be consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. Following are examples of King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide Planning Policies that are addressed by the proposed Lindberg Annexation: FW-13:Cities are the appropriate providers of Iocal urban services to Urban Areas. LU-31: The County should identify urban development areas within the Urban Growth Area. . , . LU-32: The County should encourage cities to annex territory within their designated potential annexation area. LU-33: Land within a city's potential annexation area shall be developed according to local and regional growth phasing plans. U-203: Population growth should be encouraged in Urban Growth Areas. U-204: The County should support annexations that are consistent with Countywide Planning Policies and the State Growth Management Act. U-208: Land capacity shall be provided for residential, commercial and industrial growth. U-304: Growth should be focused within city boundaries. The proposed Lindberg Annexation is reportedly consistent with the provisions of RCW 36.93 (Boundary Review Board Regulations). For example, this annexation would be consistent with Objective 1, which calls for the preservation of neighborhoods. This area is linked to east Renton by geographic features social fabric (e.g., similar land uses, open spaces, common terrain features). Similarly, the annexation would be consistent with Objective 2, which calls for the use of physical boundaries to demarcate an annexation area. For the Lindberg Area, boundaries are primarily formed by roadways and by existing City boundaries. The Lindberg Annexation would also be consistent with Objective 3, which calls for creation of logicai service areas. Local residents have petitioned for annexation in order that aii services and land use regulations affecting their area may be efficiently coordinated by a single local government unit. The City of Renton is prepared to govern and serve the area. The proposed annexation is also reportedly consistent with Objectives 4-7, which call for the achievement of reasonable boundaries for a jurisdiction. While the proposed annexation is small in size, the area lies within the Auburn PAA and so this incorporation is consistent with City plans to govern and serve the area. This annexation would also be consistent with Objective 8, which calls for inclusion of urban areas within municipalities. The City of Renton has conducted fiscal analyses related to the proposed Lindberg Annexation. At full development, City expenditures are estimated at $86,024 and revenues are estimated at $93,652. Upon annexation, property owners will assume their share of the regular and special levy rate of the City for capital facilities and public services. The City will have sufficient funds to serve the area at present without a significant impact on cost and adequacy of services, finances, debt structure or rights of other governmental units. Future capital needs and costs will be examined and funded through the Renton Capital Investment Program. The City of Renton supports this annexation in order to serve citizens of the area. New residential development and coordinated services would benefit the greater Renton community. a �, - Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Building, Room 402, 400 Yesler Way, Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • yittp://wzvw.metrokc.gov/crnrrexntions July 25, 2005 City of Renton Attn: Don Erickson. AICP Senior Planner 1u�5 Soutn Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: REQUEST FOR REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION File No. 2202 —City of Renton—Lindberg Annexation Dear Mr. Erickson: Enclosed please find a copy of the letter from King County Engineering staff regarding the legal description submitted as part of the above Notice of Intention. If you are in agreement with the corrections and suggestions made in the letter, please submit a revised legal description to our office as soon as possible. The corrected legal description must be used on all future documents related to this proposal. We suggest you direct any questions concerning the County Engineering recommendations to Nicole Keller, Road Services Division, at 206-296-3731. Sincerely, �v�-•-,�.) Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Enclosure: Letter from King County Road Services Division dated July 20, 2005 cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council (w/o enclosures) Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services(w/o enclosures) FORM 8 • a � RECEIV ED lCing Count� JUL 2 5 2005 Road Services Division Department of Transportation VIW State Boundary Review Board For King Co. KSC-TR-0231 201 South Jackson Street Seattle,WA 98104-3856 July 20, 2005 Lenora Blauman Executive Secretary Boundary Review Board YES-BR-0220 RE: City of Renton—Lindberg.Annexation(File 2202� Dear Ms. Blauman: Thank you for the opportunity to review the legal description for the proposed Lindberg Annexation to the City of Renton transmitted with your June 22, 2005 letter. Staff has reviewed the enclosed legal description and found it to be unsatisfactorv. Staff found that the adjacent boundary of a previous annexation ordinance, City of Renton— Carlo Annexation(BRB File 2166), is not depicted as adopted in approved City Ordinance 5074. Therefore, the proposed Lindberg Annexation leaves islands of unincorporated rights-of-way that need to be included in the annexation. The Carlo Annexation was previously reviewed and approved by staff on March 8, 2004. However, the legal description adopted with Ordinance 5074 is not the same as the version approved by staff. Furthermore, the Carlo Annexation area highlighted on the assessor's map accompanying this proposal is similarly inconsistent with Ordinance 5074. While Ordinance 5074 could be amended to include all rights-of-way that were left out, staff recommends simply revising the proposed Lindberg Annexation to include said rights-of-way. With the several minor changes and additions of previously excluded rights-of-way, listed below, this legal description will be complete and satisfactory. Page 1, Paragraph 5, Line 3, where it says "King County Short Plat No. 8201220536" it should read"King County Short Plat No. 881050" Please add another paragraph reading "TOGETHER WITH a portion of right-of-way with a boundary described as follows: Starting in the Northwest corner of the Southwest quarter (1/4) of the Northeast quarter(1/4) of said Section 15, Then S 88°21'10" E 62 feet, thence S 0°31'45" W 30 feet to THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence N 88°21'10 W 20 feet, thence S 0°31'45" W 20 feet, thence northeast 31.81 �.�,=ozM ' --� ` . Lenora Blauman July 20, 2005 Page 2 feet along a tangential curve, with a radius of 20 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Please add the following, which were excluded from Ordinance 5074: "TOGETHER WITH the east 30 feet of the south half(1/2) of the north half(1/2) of the southwest quarter(1/4) of the southeast quarter(1/4) of the northwest quarter (1/4) of said Section 15; and" "TOGETHER WITH the west 42 feet of the southwest quarter (1/4) of the northeast quarter(1/4) of said Section 15; LESS that portion lying southerly of the south line of said north half(1/2) of the southeast quarter (1/4) of the southeast quarter(1/4) of the northwest quarter (1/4) of said Section 15 extended easterly across 140th Avenue SE, to a point on the west line of Lot 49 of Puget Colony Homes, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 86 of Plats, Page 59, records of King County, Washington; and" "TOGETHER WITH the portion of street known as 138th Avenue SE lying in the southeast quarter(1/4)of the northeast quarter(1/4) of the northwest quarter(1/4) of said Section 15, said street varying in width from 20 feet to 30 feet and back to 20 feet." This annexation does not include a portion of a County park. If you have any questions, please contact Nicole Keller, Vacations and Boundaries Engineer, at 206-296-3731, or via e-mail at Road.R/Wvacations@metrokc.gov. Sincerely, L�c� �� L dia Reynol s-Jones Manager Project Support Services LRJ:NK:mr Enclosures cc: Paulette Norman, P.E., County Road Engineer, Road Services Division Anne Noris, Clerk of the King County Council (w/enclosures) Nicole Keller, Engineer II, Engineering Services Section, Road Services Division - Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County Yesler Building, Room 402,400 Yesler Way,Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • hftp://www.metrokc.gov/annexrrtions June 22, 2005 TO: Ms. Lydia Reynolds-Jones Department of Transportation Manager, Project Support Services KSC-TR-0231 FROM: Lenora Blauman, Executive Secretary SUBJECT: File No. 2202 - City of Renton - Lindberg Annexation Enclosed please find the legal description and related Assessors map(s) submitted to our office as part of the above-referenced Notice of Tntention. We would appreciate your reviewing the legal description and reporting your findings and recommendations back to our office. The copy of the enclosed legal description is for your use and files. It would facilitate processing of revisions to the legal description, however, if you would return a copy of the Iegal, with any notations you choose to nnake, along with your report. We would appreciate your response within the 45-day waiting period, which is expected to end August 6, 2005. The deadline for requesting that the Board invoke jurisdiction and hold a public hearing can only be changed by a revision to the legal description or modification of the original Notice of Intention. The support and expert assistance which you and your staff provide on legal descriptions is essential to Board processing of proposed actions. Please let us know if we need to provide you with any further data. Enclosures: Legal Description/Maps R.S.V.P. _Julv 15, 2005 FORM 5 �� „_,i�i�w� � �� (��i�l �1 IIIII� � = �� ,�� :� ,�+ �. Illt �: � � � � �� r i/� .�i..''-`i .��rl � �� 1111111 �� I�� r � � � - � �� r�J ,``, � In �� M � ��,��'i� �'��'1�, . ' ,� _ ` .i�� ►-�� 1�,�1�1�11�� ;� �IE��i !':�� .. . � �'�� I r� �, ��1�1�1E� ';,� 1�1� ii ��' �� .,....�._ � �� -� ,_ Ili� �� 'o'.: Y � � : � 11��1� �� 111� �r11:�111� ■!► , , �i ■ :�� :: �� ■ . ■ :: � ��- ��r�' . � � ��111� ��►�� . ; �� - ��r � _ � %,� �: �"� .�. _ �►�i � � � � �i . .. i �� r` ii� ' ' ' ' '� '�I��G� ��i �� .�'► �, �'� : �� ,. 1� �■ �� ,,, � __ ► �/�L�t� � � �t� � �� ►�� '� - - ' ..� ,.1��►.. `■ _ ��,,��E3 � �� _ /� ��II � �"�' ��►� ;�� - �� //F� - �► �� : �� r� ► _ �!�■�1�� .�� - ► •� /'//r�� !�tiu .�■��f � : : : I��C� . 1►�� II��'� `� �� ■� t� 11►�►�i,��►� � r `'� �.. �� ,�� I � �� , �� ♦,�� w��,w��1�� 1� _ �■ � ��, li`�V'� �� I � � . �■ ��. ��...��.�� 1� .��_� . _ �■ � � � - � � � tl � ' - . � � � � � � � � ::.�..�.:::.::::::;::::>:.::::::.::.::.>:<. � ' �� •� ' � :. r. ��:<,:.>;�;«.;;:>; - � � • ili „ � � � � � �: � , ► � , ,, • , ; � ; � E�C111b1� j� LINDBERG ANNEXATION ' LEGAL DESCRIpTIpN . The Southeast guarter(1/4)of the Northeast quarter{1/4)of the Northwest quarter(1/4) of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M.,King County,W��gton; EXCEPT the north 186.15 feet of the west 234 feet thereof; and EXCEPT that portion for � Road (l38`�Avenue SE); � TOGETHER WITH Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 881050,as recarded under King County Rec.No. 8201220536,records of King County,Washington, in the Northwest quarter(1/4)of the Northeast quarter(1/4)af said Section 15; and TOGETHER WTTH the south I00 feet of the west 190 feet of the north half(1/2)of the Southwest quarter(1/4)of the Northwest quarter(1/4)of the Northeast quarter(1/4)of said Section 15; and TOGETHER W1T'H the east 30 feet of the west 220 feet of the south �� 34 feet of said subdivision; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of 140�'Ave SE in the south haLf(1/2)of the Southwest � quarter(1/4)of the Northwest quarter(1/4)of the Northeast quarter(1/4)of said Section 1 S;and TOGET'I�R WITH that portion of SE 132"d Street in said subdivisions lying westerly of the east line of said Lot 1 of King Connty Short Plat No. 881050 extended southerly, to the south line of said subdivision; and � � TOGETHER WiTH that portion of SE 132"d Street in the Southwest quarter(1/4)of the Northeast quarter(1/4)of said Section 15,]ying westerly of the east line of said Lot 1 of King County Short Pla allo. 8201220536 extended southerly,to the southerly right-of- way margin of SE 132 Street,and lying easterly of the easterly right-of way mazgin of 14U`h Ave SE extended northerly,to the�north line of said subdivision. FILE N0. 2202 - CITY OF RENTON - LINDBERG ANNEXATION �. NOTICE OF INTENTION PROPOSED LINDBERG ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RENTON I. BACKGROUND/MAPS 1. The description of and reason for seeking the proposed action: The proposed action is to annex approximately 9.72 acres to the City of Renton. Annexation is sought by the proponents to develop under City of Renton regulations and processes and to receive Renton public services. The annexation was initiated through the 60% Direct Petition method under RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140,and 150. The proposed annexation area is located in the W 1/2 of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range S East. 2. Copies of the Renton City Council minutes for actions taken relative to the proposed annexation: A. Exhibit A: Certified minutes of the December 20, 2004 public meeting of the Renton City Council accepting the Lindberg Annexation 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition and authorizing the circulation of the 60%Petition to Annex. B. Exhibit B: Certified minutes of the May 23, 2005 public hearing of the Renton City Council accepting the 60% Direct Petition to Annex and declaring the City's intent to annex the area, subject to the actions of the Boundary Review Board. 3. Exhibit C: Certification of Sufficiency for the 60% Petition to Annex made by the King County Department of Assessments dated March 7,2005. 4. Exhibit D: Legal description of the proposed annexation boundaries. 5. Pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.222,annexations are exempt from SEPA. 6. The following maps are enclosed: A. Exhibit E: King County Assessor's maps (two sets) displaying the proposed Lindberg Annexation boundary. B. Exhibit F: Vicinity maps displaying: 1) The proposed Lindberg Annexation boundary. 2) The City of Renton existing corporate limits relative to the proposed annexation area. 3) All major streets and other major physical features. � Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County ' Proposed Lindberg Annexation 06/06/OS Page 2 4) T'he boundaries, including future service area boundaries, of all cities or special service districts having jurisdiction in or near the proposal. NOTE: The City and County library service area boundaries are coterminous with the City's corporate boundary. 5) King County Urban Growth Area and City of Renton Potential Annexation Area boundaries established under the Growth Management Act. C. Exhibit G: A map of the current City of Renton corporate limits upon which the proposed Lindberg Annexation boundaries have been delineated. D. Exhibit H: City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations. II. FACTORS THE BOARD MUST CONSIDER 1. Overview A. Population: The population of the proposed annexation area is estimated to be about 158 persons at full build out based upon 2.5 persons per household and a total of 63 households. The City of Renton population as of Apri12004 was 55,360. B. Territorv: The proposed annexation area includes approximately 9.72 acres. C. Population Densitv: The proposed population density of the Lindberg Annexation area is estimated to be about 16.3 persons per gross acre. D. Assessed Valuation: The current assessed value of the properties proposed for annexation is approximately$2,364,000. 2. Land Use A. Existin : Existing uses include nine single-family homes with an estimated population of 23 persons. B. Proposed: A portion of the subject annexation has been looked at as a preliminary application for a preliminary plat. The annexation is proposed to facilitate the development of these properties for single-family residential uses at up to eight(8) units per net acre. 3. Comprehensive Plans/Franchise(s) A. Conformance with County Countywide Plannin�Policies adopted by King Count� The proposed action is consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies in general, and the following policies in particular: LU-31 In collaboration with adjacent counties and cities and King County, and in consultation with residential groups in affected areas, each city shall designate a potential annexation area. Each potential annexation area shall be specific to each city.... R . Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Lindberg Annexation 06/06/OS Page 3 LU-32 A city may annex territory only within its designated potential annexation area. All cities shall phase annexations to coincide with the ability for the city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services to areas to be annexed. The City of Renton has designated a Potential Annexation Area in the City's Comprehensive Plan. (Exhibit H) Renton has the ability to provide a full range of urban services to the area proposed for annexation and is the designated sewer service provider for the East Renton Plateau. LU-33 Undeveloped lands adjacent to that city should be annexed at the time development is proposed to receive a full range of urban services. New development is likely to proceed upon annexation into the City of Renton and the availability of sewers. Sewer certificates have already been issued for new housing developments to the west and south of the site and can easily be extended to serve the subject annexation site when it develops. FW-13.Cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to urban areas either directly or by contract. Renton is prepared to provide a full array of local urban services to the area including sewer, water, police, fire, local government and an array of other community services. Renton is the designated water purveyor for the western two- thirds of the site and Water District No. 90 is the designated purveyor of water under agreement with King County, for the eastern third of the site. B. King C�tv Comprehensive Plan/Ordinances 1) King County Planning under the Growth Management Act. The subject area is designated Urban - 4-12 du/ac in the King County Comprehensive Plan and is identified as being within Renton's Potential Annexation Area on the County's Potential Annexation Areas Map. King County planning efforts under the Growth Management Act have included ensuring that.development in the Urban Growth Area occurs at urban densities and with urban level services available. The City of Renton has planned for urban densities for this area and can provide urban services within its negotiated service azeas should annexation occur. 2) The following adopted King County Comprehensive Plan policies specifically support the proposed annexarion: Chapter Two. Urban Land Use, Section II.B. Directing Growth to Cities and Urban Areas U-203 King County should encourage most population and employment growth to locate in the contiguous Urban Growth Area in western King Counry, especially in cities and their potential annexation areas. Annexation would allow development of the subject properties to occur within the City of Renton with urban services such as wastewater, police, libraries, local government, and parks. J Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County ' Proposed Lindberg Annexation 06/06/OS Page 4 Chanter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.C, Urban Growth Area Targets U-208 King County shall provide adequate land capacity for residential, commercial and industrial growth in the urban unincorporated area. This land capacity shall include both redevelopment opportunities as well as opportunities for development on vacant lands. R-8 zoning on the subject properties would approximate the capacity represented by the existing King County zoning, which is R-4. Renton's R- 8 zone would result is approximately 7% more capacity than the current County zoning since Renton calculates density based upon net acreage and the County's calculates density based upon�ross acreage. An estimated 58 units could be provided under the County's R-4 zoning (with bonuses) and approximately 62 units could be provided under Renton's proposed R-8 zoning. Chapter Two. Urban Land Use, Section III.A, Plannin� with Kin� County's Cities for Future Annexation U-301 King County should work with cities to focus countywide growth within their boundaries and should support annexations within the Urban Growth Area when consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan and Countywide PZanningPolicies. U-304 King County should support annexation proposals when: a. The proposal is consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan; b. The proposed area is wholly within the Urban Growth Area and within the city's designated Potential Annexation Area (for annexations); c. The city is planning for urban densities and efficient land use patterns consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies and King County land use plans; and, d. Adopted Countywide goals and policies for urban services, environmental and cultural resource protection will be supported. The proposal is generally consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. T'he area proposed for annexation is wholly within the Urban Growth Area and within Renton's Potential Annexation Area.. The City's Comprehensive Plan policies and development regulations support countywide goals and policies for urban densities,urban services and environmental and cultural resource protection. The proposed R-8 zoning is urban, small lot zoning, which will achieve urban densities and efficiencies consistent with adopted countywide goals and policies for urban services. • Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Lindberg Annexation 06/06/OS Page 5 3) Adopted Kin�Count�omp Plan desi�nation: The adopted King County Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the proposed annexation area is Urban Residential - 4-12 du/ac. This designation is implemented with the R-4 Zone,which bonuses up to six units per acre, on the subject site. 4) Comnarison of City and County reQulations for sensitive areas etc: With annexation, King County ordinances and regulations would be supplanted with those of the City of Renton. City of Renton ordinances and regulations applicable to the proposed action include the following: a. Regulations for the protection of sensitive areas: The City of Renton's Critical Areas Ordinance (RMC 4-3-050) describes permitted and prohibited activities and uses,waivers,modifications and variances,and additional criteria and permit processes for development in critical areas. Critical areas regulated by the Ordinance include aquifer recharge areas, flood and geologic hazard areas, native habitat and wetlands. Although specific regulations vary, Chapter 21A.24, Environmentallv Sensitive Areas, of the King County Code provides comparable regulatory protection of sensitive areas. The City of Renton Critical Areas Ordinance is available upon request. b. Re�ulations for the preservation of a�ricultural or other resource lands: Regulations preserving agricultural uses are not applicable to the subject area, as the proposed annexation area is not within any of the agricultural districts identified for first, second or third priority for the purchase of development rights. Further, the property is not designated for agricultural production or other resource lands in the King County Comprehensive Plan and is not currently under agricultural use. The City of Renton does not have a program authorizing transfer or purchase of development rights. c. Preservation of Landmarks or Landmark Districts: The City of Renton has no regulations comparable to Chapter 20.62, Protection and Preservation of Landmarks. Landmark Sites and Districts, in the King County Code. However, no landmark sites or districts are identified in the Newcastle Community Plan or are known to exist in the subject annexation area. d. Surface Water Control: The City of Renton has adopted the 1990 Kin� Count�Surface Water Design Manual, by reference, in the City's Drainage (Surface Water) Standards (RMC 4-6-030) as the design standard for surface water control in development projects. Higher standards such as those of the 1998 King Countv Surface Water Desi� Manual. Level 2 standard are often applied through environmental review. C. City of Renton Comprehensive Plan/Franchise 1) City Planning Under the Growth Mana�ement Act Renton City Council adopted the current Comprehensive Plan in 1995, consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan was updated in the 2004 Mandated Growth Management Act Comprehensive Plan Review. The Comprehensive Plan Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County ' Proposed Lindberg Annexation 06/06/OS Page 6 Land Use Map identifies Potential Annexation Areas, including the area cunently proposed for annexation,and shows land use designations for such areas. (See Exhibit H,City of Renton Land Use Designations) The proposal is consistent with the Land Use Element policies of the Renton Comprehensive Plan that support annexation of lands: • that are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area where the availability of infrastructure and services allow for the development of urban densities(Objective LU-1); • that are vacant and subject to development pressure(LU-37.3); • that are available for urbanization under county comprehensive planning,zoning,and subdivision regulations(LU-37.5); • for which the City of Renton should logically be the primary provider of urban infrastructure and services(LU-36); • that would include those who already use City services or who impact City infrastructure(LU-41);and • that includes environmenta.11y sensitive areas and vacant land where future development could adversely influence the environmental and land use character of Renton(LU-42). 2) PAA status and PAA agreements with other cities, if any: The City of Renton has an adopted Potential Annexation Area. This area includes two or three sub-areas, which are shown on Renton's Comprehensive Plan and on the King County Interim Potential Annexation Area Map. The City has also negotiated a PAA boundary agreement with the City of Kent. No PAA agreement was necessary for the area currently proposed annexation. 3) Required Comprehensive Plan amendments, if anX: No amendment to Renton's Comprehensive Plan is necessary to process the current proposed annexation. 4) Comnrehensive Plan apnroval date: Renton's current Comprehensive Plan was initially adopted on February 20, 1995, with annual amendments in subsequent years. The latest, 2004 Mandated GMA Comprehensive Plan Review was completed in November 2004. 5) Required franchises to serve area: No franchise will be required for the City of Renton to provide services to the subject area. 6) Pre-annexation Zonin�greements: The subject area has not been the subject of a pre-Annexation Zoning Agreement. 7) Pronosed land use desi ation: The subject area is designated Residential Single Family in the City's Comprehensive Plan. R-8 zoning is proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning, consistent with the adopted Residential Low Density land use designation upon annexation. Under Renton's annexation process, zoning is adopted concunent with the adoption of the implementing annexation ordinance. 4. Planning data . Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Lindberg Annexarion 06/06/OS Page 7 A. Revenues/Expenditures This analysis identifies the General Fund revenues and costs associated with annexing the subject properties as they are currently developed, as well as estimating the annual fiscal impact of their full development at some undetermined point in the future. "Full development" does not equate to the absolute zoned capacity. Rather, it includes an assumption that a portion of the subject properties will not develop within the foreseeable future due to market forces and the choices of individual property owners. All assumptions regarding revenues and costs are based on existing standazds or other comparable data,but actual results are likely to vary from these estimates. In general, costs associated with utilities have been assumed to be supported by the rates charged for those services. Assessed Valuations Units Population(est.) Assessed Valuation Existin conditions 9 23 $2,364,000 Full develo ment est. 63* 158 $22,050,000 *Assumes new home value of$350,000 per unit. 1) Estimated City Expenditures City Services Current Full Development Development Contracted services $243 $2 058 Road Maintenance $3 643 $1 667 Fire Protection $2 955 $27 563 Police Protection $6 210 $42 660 Parks Maintenance $343 $2 354 Court,Legal and Other $1 313 $9 019 Stormwater Maintenance $374 $703 Total ongoing costs $15,081 $86,024 2) Estimated Citv Revenues to be ag i` Current Full Revenue Source Development Development Regular Property Tax Levy $7 423 $69 237 State-Shared Revenues $687 $4 716 Miscellaneous Revenues $2 560 $17 744 Excess Le $210 $1 955 Total revenues $10,880 $93,652 3) Estimated Net Fiscal Impact Net fiscal impact Existing ($4,201) Full $7,628 Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County ' Proposed Lindberg Annexation 06/06/OS Page 8 3) Estimated County revenues lost: The estimated reduction in County revenues would be$5,589 at current development(road and library levies, excluding library bonds). 4) Estimated reduction in Countv expenditures: The estimated reduction in County expenditures is anticipated to be minimal, as only a minor amount of improved King County roadway exists in the proposed annexation area. 5) Estimated fire district revenue lost: The area proposed for annexation lies within Fire District No. 25. The City currently provides fire services under contract to Fire District No. 25. As consequence there is no estimated loss of revenue to this district. 6) Estimated fire district expenditures reduced: The estimated savings to Fire District No. 25 because of this annexation is minimal. The District is now paying approximately $24 annually to the City for fire services,based upon an estimated population of 23persons. B. Services 1) Water Service The proposed annexation is within both Renton's and District No. 90's water service areas. These service areas would not change as a result of the proposed annexation. a) Direct/Contract: The western two thirds of the annexation area will be served by the City of Renton upon annexation. The eastern third of the area will continue to be served by District No. 90 for the foreseeable future. Future development in this latter area will have to notify District No. 90 regarding water availability and obtain a certificate of water availability prior to future development. b) Storage locations/Capacitv: The zoned residential capacity under the existing King County zoning is slightly less than the capacity under the proposed City of Renton R-8 zoning. Since population growth under the City of Renton's proposed R-8 zoning is only about 7% more than allowed under the County's cunent R-4 zoning, the District's capacity should be adequate for the water demand generated by post-annexation development in the subject area. If anything, the change in zoning that would occur upon annexation of this small area would theoretically have only a minor impact on storage capacity. c) Mains to serve the area: Both the City of Renton and Water District No. 90 will require developers to extend mains into the annexation area as part of their future development proposals. d) Financing of proposed service: This will be financed by developers and normal user fees for existing and new residents. . Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Lindberg Annexarion 06/06/OS Page 9 2) Sanitarv Sewer Service a) Direct/Contract: Sewer service would be provided directly to the proposed 9.72-acre annexation area by the City of Renton. b) Mains to serve area: None of the annexation site is currently being served by the City of Renton. However, the City Wastewater Utility serves the new Laurel Hurst subdivision to the west and south of the proposed annexation,where it abuts the City boundary. c) Dis�osal: Sewage disposal will be through METRO's treatment facilities. d) CapacitY Available: Renton's sanitary sewer system has sufficient capacity to accommodate full buildout of the proposed annexation area. e) Financing of _proposed service: Improvements within this annexation area would be anticipated to be made through developer extensions or homeowner extensions in the future when residents decide they want sewer hook-up. 3) Fire Service a) DirectlContract: The City of Renton currently provides fire suppression services to the annexation area under contract with King County Fire District No. 25. Following annexation, the City of Renton would directly provide prevention and suppression services to the subject area. b) Nearest stations: The annexarion area is located between Fire Station #12 in the City of Renton and Fire Station#25-1 in District No. 25. Fire Station #12 is located at 1209 Kirkland Avenue NE and Station#25-1 is located approximately a mile east of the site at the corner of 156`�'Avenue SE and SE 128�'Street. c) Response time: Response time to any point within the proposed annexation boundaries could range from four to six minutes. Since Fire Station #25-1 is very close to the subject site and will not change because of this annexation. Therefore there should be no change in the response time. d) Staffin�: Station#12 is fully manned, with five firefighters on duty per shift. Station #25-1 is also fully manned and has three firefighters on duty per shift. e) Maior equivment: Major equipment located at Station#12 includes two 1,500 gallon per minute pumpers and one aid car. fl Certified EMT/D-Fib personnel: All shift personnel at Station #12 are certified EMT/D-Fib. Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County ' Proposed Lindberg Annexation 06/06/OS Page 10 g) Fire Ratin�: Renton's fire rating is three, as determined by the Washington State Survey and Rating Bureau. h) Source of dispatch: Valley Communication 911 service is the source of emergency vehicle/aid dispatch. 5. General A) Annexation aQxeements for extensions of service: No applicable annexation agreements are in effect for the subject area. � Topo r�aphv and natural boundaries: The site slopes gently down to the east towards the eastfork of Maplewood Creek with a slope of approximately 1.7°/a. This represents a 13.5-foot change over approximately 800 feet. B) Projected 10-year r�owth: The area is too small to make reasonable inferences from large-area growth forecasts. The City projects about 58 new single-family units in addition to the existing eight units on the site. This is based on existing citywide R- 4 densities and assumptions regarding identified physical and regulatory constraints to development of the site and the probable market availability of land for new development. D) Municipal or communitv services: With annexation, the property owners and residents would have access to a full range of urban services including police, fire, parks, libraries, community services, the City's neighborhoods program, annual community events,and local,readily accessible,government. E) Potential delays in implementin� service deliverX: The area is currently underserved in regards to park facilities according to the City's adopted level of service standards. This shortfall is identified in the City's Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan update. Staff estimates a one-time cost in excess of parks/recreation mitigation fees of$35,383 as well as on-going maintenance costs of$2,354 for new parks associated with this annexation. The current waste hauler would continue to provide solid waste removal for seven years after annexation; according to State law. At that time, the area would then be included in the contract with the City's waster hauler. With the exception of parks and solid waste removal,no delays are expected in implementing service delivery to the area. City departments reviewing the annexation proposal indicated that they would be able to adequately serve existing and future development. Water District No. 90 is expected to continue to provide water service to the eastern third of the site,and has not indicated any major obstacles to service delivery at this time. F) Evaluation of adequacv, costs. or rates of service to area: Existing services to the area appear to be generally adequate. As development occurs in the proposed annexation area, demand for services will increase. It is assumed that the cost of such services will be largely offset by increases in property taxes, services charges and other revenues based on population. If the City were to assume this annexation at current levels of development it would have to subsidize it for approximately $575 per year. At full development, in an estimated 10 years,the City would realize an annual surplus of an estimated$8,580 per year. t Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Proposed Lindberg Annexation 06/06/OS Page 11 King County is the only alternative service provider for services that would be assumed by the City of Renton upon annexation. Fire suppression services will not change as a result of the proposed annexation since the City is already providing these services to Fire District No. 25 under contract. And, school district boundaries are not affected by annexations. As a result the subject area will remain within the Renton School District. III. OBJECTIVES The proposed Lindberg Annexation generally complies with all of the objectives of the Boundary Review Board. These include the following: 1) Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities. No detrimental impacts to existing neighborhoods or communities are anticipated to result frorn the proposed action. 2) Use of physical boundaries,including but not limited to bodies of water, highways and land contours. The proposed annexation follows the existing city limits on its north. 'The of the annexation is defined by and includes SE 132"d Street,an east-west collector and southern boundary street,which currently is only partially developed as a street. The eastern boundary of the annexation includes 140"'Avenue SE,an unimproved north-south street. 3) Creation and preservation of logical service areas. City staff that have reviewed the proposed annexation have stated that the proposed boundaries appear to represent logical extensions for City of Renton services. Also,the Countywide Planning Policies state that cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to Urban Areas. 'I'he proposal would therefore further both the intent of the City annexation objectives and Countywide Planning Policies. 4) Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries. The boundaries do not create abnormally inegular boundaries. The surrounding to the southeast is also within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and is anticipated to be eventually annexed into the City. Therefore, any irregularities are considered to be only interim. 5) Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporation of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas. Not applicable. 6) Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts. Not applicable. 7) Adjustment of impractical boundaries. This annexation is not being undertaken to adjust impractical city boundaries. Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County ' Proposed Lindberg Annexation 06/06/OS Page 12 8) Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas,which are urban in character King County has designated this area for urban development. 9) Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. No portions of the proposed annexation area are designated Rural or designated for long term productive agricultural or resource use in the King County Comprehensive Plan. finis . Exhibit A CERTIFICATE I,the�ndersigned City Clerk afthe City of Renton, Washington,certify that this is a true d correct copy of Counctl 1�linuks S�f�aes. Subscribed and sealed this�day of Tuna ,2003 �tr�c.,u.i'� LrJGt��"o�-- RENTON CITY COUNCIL City C�erk Regular Meeting May 23,2005 Council Chambers Monday,730 p.m M I N U T E S Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. �, ROLL CALL OF TERRI BRIERE,Council President;MARCIE PALMER;DON PERSSON; COUNCILMEMBERS RANDY CORMAN;TOrTi NELSON;DAN CLAWSON;DElVIS LAW. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER,Mayor;JAY COVINGTON,Chief ATTENDANCE Administrative Officer;LAWRENCE J.WARREN,City Attorney;MICHELE NEUMANN,Deputy City Clerk;GREGG ZIlvII��RMAN, PlanningfBuilding/Public Works Administrator;KEITH WOOLLEY,Civil Engineer III,ALEX PIETSCH,Economic Development Administrator; DEI�TNIS CIILP,Community Services Administrator;COMMANDER KATIE MCCLINCY,Police Department. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated that as part of the 2005 legislative session wrap- Legislature:2005 State up report,three legislators will be making presentations. Alex Pietsch, Legislative Session Wrap-Up Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning(EDNSP) Administrator,explained that the EDNSP Department is responsible for coordinating the legislative affairs of the City,and works in conjunction with the other departments and a paid lobbyist,Doug Levy. Pointing out that the 20Q5 legislative session was one of the most successful . sessions the City has experienced,Mr.Pietsch stated that the City worked � proactively with the nine legislators that represent Renton. Mr.Pietsch highlighted the legislative actioris that have an effect on Renton as follows: • Received$5 million in Capital Budget to help with the redevelopment of former Bceing property in the South Lake Washington neighborhood. • The Freight Mobility Budget includes$4 million for the SW 27th St.and � Strander Blvd.project. • Over$2 million was granted for the SR-169 Corridor improvements. • Through the passage of the 9.5-cent per gallon gas tax,more than$300 million of improvements will directly benefit Renton by expanding the capacity of I-405. • Legislation was not enacted regarding sales tax streamlining. • A jobs development fund was enacted that set aside$50 million biennium for public infrastructnre necessary to create jobs. • Tobacco settlement dollars were set aside for investment in life sciences and support of life sciences research. Representative Fred Jarrett,41st District,emphasized how well the legislators `" worked together on the interes[s of Renton. He agreed that the legislative session was successful for Renton,but stated that more can be done. Mr. Jarrett noted the benefits of the 9.5-cent per gallon gas tax;however,he indicated that if a Regional Transportation Investment District package is not May 23,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Paoe 190 D passed next year, all of the money is available for reappropriation. He asked for the City's assistance and support in pushing forward with the regional transportation package. � - Representative Judy Clibborn,41st District,pointed out how important the Capital Budget and the Transportation Budget are to this area's economic development. She indicated that despite the issues surrounding the Governor's race,the legislators worked hard during the session. Ms. Clibborn also ' indicated that legislators worked across party lines for a balanced session, and there were many accomplishments. Additionally,she highlighted a bill that she sponsored this session, which allows employers to give references for employees with increased protection for the employers'liability. Representative Boli Hasegawa, l lth District,reported that despite the State'� budget problems, a budget was crafted that did not cut services to citizens as much as was expected. He noted that 40,000 additional children will be provided healthcare, and that financial aid will be available to part-time students. Mr.Hasegawa stated that he is proud of the work that was accomplished. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler thanked the legislators for the work they performed on Renton's behalf. With the assistance of Council President Briere,she presented them with certificates of appreciation. Mr. Pietsch noted that the City's investment in Doug Levy paid off tremendously,and the Mayor also expressed her appreciation for Mr.Levy's efforts. PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation:Lindberg, 138th accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the �Ave n St public hearing to consider the 60%Notice of Intent petition and future zoning for the proposed Lindberg Annezation,which consists of 10.11 acres, including the abutting street right-of-way,located east of 138th Ave. SE(Duvall Ave. NE)and north of SE 132nd St. (NE 2nd St.). Alex Pietsch,Economic Development Administrator, stated that the area proposed for annexation contains nine single-family dwellings,is relatively flat with a two percent slope from west to east, and is constrained by potential wetlands affecting two northem parcels. The area is served by Fire District #25,Renton water,Water District#9U,Renton sewer,and the Renton School District. He noted that cunent King County zoning for the area is R-4(four dwelling units per gross acre),and Renton's Comprehensive Plan designation is Residential Single Family. Therefore,proposed Renton zoning is R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre). Mr.Pietsch reported that the annexation is generally consistent with Boundary Review Board objectives. The fiscal impact analysis indicates a surplus of $8,580 at full development,and an estimated one-time parks development cost of$35,383. He pointed out the necessity of the one-time parks development cost,explaining that the parks mitigation fee collected upon development dces not cover the full cost of providing the City's desired level of service. In conclusion,Mr. Pietsch stated that the proposed annexation serves the best interests and general welfare of the City,and is consistent with City annexation policies. He noted that the Utility Division suggests using King County's 1998 Surface Water Design Manual, Level II standards for future development. May 23,2005 Renton City Council Minutes PaQe 191 b Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL: ACCEPT THE LINDBERG ANNEXATION 60%DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX; SUPPORT FUTURE R-8 ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSNE PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION;AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMIIVISTRATION TO SUBMIT THE NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD AND PREPARE THE RELEVANT ORDINANCES. CARRIED. Transport�tion: NE 3rd/4th St This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Corridor Improvements Study accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the . Final Report public hearing to consider the final report for the NE 3rd and 4th Street Corridor Improvernents Study Project(from Sunset Blvd. N. to the City limits). Keith Woolley,Civil Engineer III,explained that the purpose of the project was to develop a comprehensive set of street,traffic control, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, and actions that will address the existing and future access and circulation needs of the corridor. He stated that an evaluation of the existing corridor system was conducted indicating: tra�c congestion; inadequate capacity;operational and safety problems(especially those involving]eft turns); an incomplete sidewalk system;a lack of bicycle facilities;and an inconsistent streetscape. Mr. Woolley reported that in order to keep the community involved in the planning process, three public open houses were held over the course of the project. He indicated that a "Boulevazd"concept is recommended for the corridor,both in look and in function. Recommended improvements include: intersection improvements,a center median,bus pullouts,sidewalk buffering, bicycle facilities,and improved aesthetics(roadside and median landscaping). Mr.Woolley pointed out that the center median will provide access management, safety, speed control,and beautification. Continuing,Mr.Woolley displayed and reviewed schematic diagrams and cross sections of the conceptual plan,as well as the conceptual layout plan for the . various segments along the corridor. Mr.Woolley reviewed the issues relating to implementation and construction,including steep slopes,the need to acquire additional right-of-way,existing transmission power utility poles,existing corner developments at key intersections,and reliance on a State I-405 improvement project. He indicated that mitigation of private property impacts, landscaping, and streetscape will be addressed at the project design level. In regards to costs and staging,Mr.Woolley stated that the improvements are estimated to cost$25 million,and will be broken down into eleven stages that range from$1 to$5 million. Noting that this project will take 15 or more years to complete,he reported that a phased prioritized implementation agproach is recommended. Mr.Woolley explained that high priority improvement projects will be furthered into pre-design as funding is pursued and becomes available. Public comment was invited. Gwendolyn High, 13405 158th Ave. SE,Renton,98059,encouraged the City to address the safety issues along the corridor,especially in the area of the Maureen Highlands Subdivision(vicinity of NE 4th St. and Rosario Ave. NE). May 23,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Paoe 192 b Noting the increase in development along the corridor, Ms. High suggested that the City focus any future revenue from annexed areas on corridor sections that are the most impacted by development. Mike O'Halloran,4420 SE 4th St.,Renton,98059,asked the City to make this project a high priority. He expressed his hope that the Liberty Ridge Subdivision developer or residents will improve their common area facing NE 3rd St., that the Washington State.Highway Maintenance Department will landscape its common area which faces NE 3rd St.,and that the intersection of Union Ave.NE and NE 4th St. will be one of the first to be improved. Tom Winter,311 Edmonds Ave.SE,Renton,98056,requested the installation of a guard rail at the top of a steep slope located on the south side of NE 3rd St., , east of Edmonds Ave. NE. He expressed concern about the safety of the . residents who live at the base of the slope in the Liberty Ridge Subdivision," saying that there is nothing to prevent cars and debris from flying over the hill and into their backyards. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated that the matter will be investigated. Dennis Neuzil,2307 94th Ave. NE,Bellevue, 98004, speaking on behalf of the Cascade Bicycle Club,indicated that the club has been working on a regional bicycle route system plan for the four counties of Central Puget Sound. He stated that NE 3rd and 4th St., and its extension of SE 128th St. over to May Valley Rd.,is proposed to be a part of the regional route. Mr.Neuzil expressed his appreciation for the inclusion of bicycle facilities in the City's corridor plan. Stanley Piha,2101 4th Ave., Suite 250, Seattle,98121, spoke on behalf of R and S Investment Company located at 4020 NE 4th St. He explained that a bus pullout is proposed that will potentially use 16 feet of the property,resulting in the removal of the majority of the landscaping in front of the property and the possible elimination of three to four parking stalls. Mr. Piha pointed out that this action may result in the property becoming a legal but nonconfomung use, and then the owner could not rebuild in the event of a fire. He asked that the City take care to mitigate the impacts of the project so that properties do not become nonconfornung,and suggested relocating the bus pullout further to the west. Councilman Cc�rman stated that this may be a good case for a variance. Councilman Clawson noted that the City of Tukwila recently adopted an ordinance regarding setbacks,and suggested that it be reviewed. There being no further public comYnent,it was MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY PALMER,SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE NE 3RD AND 4TH STREET CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS STUDY FINAL REPORT AS THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. CARRIED. ADMIIVISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted included: May 23,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 193 � Renton's Enhanced Code Enforcement and Abatement Team concept was selected over 21 other programs to receive the 2005 Municipal Achievement Award by the Association of Washington Cities. � The Renton Farmers Market begins Tuesday,June 7th,at the Piazza. The market will be open every Tuesday from 3:00 to 7:00 p.m. through September 21st. � Several City staff inembers participated in Emergency Coordination Center training activities last week. This on-going training ensures the City is prepared to respond to various large-scale emergencies and natural disasters. � A fireworks ban is now in effect in the City of Renton, where property losses caused by fireworks incidents have totaled over$575,000 in the last five years. AUDIENCE COMMENT Dave C.Hardy, 19235 108th Ave. SE,#206,Renton, 98055, spoke in support Citizen Comment: Hardy- of State House Bi112068,which relates to children testifying in dissolution Children Testifying in proceedings. Mr.Hardy explained that he is trying to obtain support for the Dissolution Proceedings(HB bill, as it still is under consideration by the Juvenile Justice and Family Law 2�g) Committee. In response to Councilman Connan's inquiry,Mr. Hardy stated that he did testify his support to the Committee. Mr. Corman pointed out that bills often take multiple legislative sessions to garner support,and he encouraged Mr. Hardy to continue to testify at Committee meetings. Citizen Comment:Brehmer- Theresa Brehmer,Bennett Development, 12011 NE lst St.,Bellevue, 98005, Sewer Moratorium in East spoke on the subject of the proposed sewer moratorium in the East Renton Renton Plateau PAA Plateau potential annexation area. She stated that Bennett Development is working on a 50-to 60-lot subdivision project located at 17250 140th St.,and expressed her concem regarding the effect of the moratorium on the project. Discussion ensued regarding the timing of the project, annexation,proximity of the project to available sewer,and the timeline for the Issaquah School District's Liberty High School sewer project. (See page 194 for committee report.) Citizen Comment: Alder, Rebecca Alder, 3112 NE 14th St.,Renton,98056, stated that by annexing the Merritt II Annexation,Low Merritt II Annexation site and applying low density residential zoning,a lot of Density Development money is being expended for the direct benefit of a few people. Instead of creating residences that can only be accessed by car and that are located on the fringes of the service areas,Ms.Alder stressed that Renton needs to revitalize its core and focus on creating places that are within walking distance, thereby resulting in the use of less oil. CON5ENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At the request of Council President Briere,item 7.c. was removed for separate consideration. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of May 16, 2005. Council concur. May 16,2005 Appointment: Library Board Mayor Keolker-Wheeler appointed Heidi Beckley, 802 Index Ct. NE,Renton, 98056,to the Library Board for a�ve-year term expiring 6/1/2010. Refer to Communitv Services Corrunittee. May 23,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Paoe 194 a Court Case: Michael Randy Court Case filed on behalf of Michael Randy Hoff by Robert S. Bryan of Hoff,CRT-OS-007 Shafer, Moen, &Brian,P.S., 1325 4th Ave., Suite 940, Seattle, 98101, al(eging that the plaintiff was falsely anested(on 5/27/2003), falsely imprisoned, falsely accused of committing criminal acts and falsely prosecuted on charges eventually dismissed. Refer to Citv Attornev and Insurance Services. Plat: Wilkinson II, Shattuck Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions,of the Ave S,FP-05-030 Wilkinson II Final Plat,five single-family lots on.94 acres located at 2245 Shattuck Ave.S. (FP-OS-030). Council concur. (See page 196 for reso)ution.) MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED TO REMOVE ITEM 7.c. FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. CARRIED. CAG: OS-052,Gene Coulon City Clerk reported bid opening on 5/5/2005 for CAG-05-052,Gene Coulon Park Boat Launch Repair, Memorial Beach Park Boat Launch Repair;three bids;engineer's estimate Global Diving &Salvage $133,874; and submitted staff recommendation to authorize the use of excess budget from completed projects and award the contract to the low bidder, Global Diving&Salvage,Inc., in the amount of$109,168.08. In response to Council President Briere's inquiry, Community Services Administrator Dennis Culp explained that this project was previously bid in October 2004. However,due to time delays brought on by the contractor, the "fish window"timeframe for the project was missed. The City withdrew the contract,and rebid the project in 2005. Mr. Culp indicated that the funding originally allocated to this project is insufficient,but savings from already completed projects were carried forward as part of the Major Maintenance/Parks Maintenance budget for 2005 and are available to use on this project. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 7.c. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE A letter was read from Clifton A.Finch,Vice President of the Washington Citizen Comment:Finch- Food Industry,711 Capitol Way,Suite 700,Olympia,98501,asking that the Grocery Cart Abandonment Washington Food Industry be given six months to develop a less burdensome approach to the matter of abandoned shopping carts that meets both the needs of the retailers and Renton. Councilman Corman inquired as to whether the Planning and Development Committee members were in receipt of this letter in time for their meeting at which the topic was discussed. Councilman Law indicated that Mr.Finch attended the meeting and discussed the matter with the Committee members. (See page 196 for committee report.) UNFI1vISHED BUSINES5 Council President Briere presented a Committee of the Whole report Committee of the Whole recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to establish a Utility: Sewer Moratorium in moratorium on sewer availability for new subdivisions on the East Renton East Renton Plateau PAA Plateau subject to the following conditions: • The moratorium be established for a six-month period. � If the Citizens'Alliance for a Responsible Evendell (CARE)fails to put together a formal package for annexation to the Council within the six- month period,then the moratorium will automatically expire unless extended by future Council action. � May 23,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 195 • If CARE puts together a formal submittal to Council within the six-month period and sets a date for an election for annexation that is outside the six- month period, then the moratorium will be extended until one month after the election is held. • If the election for annexation is approved,then the moratorium is to be extended through to the time that the City formally annexes that area. • If the election fails, then the moratorium automatically expires. The area of the moratorium shall only be that portion of the sewer service area that is within the East Renton Plateau Annexation Study Area,which is generally defined as that portion of the service area east of current City limits bounded by the Plat of White Fence Ranch and the urban growth boundary to the north, the Plat of Maplewood Heights and the City limits to the west,and ' the urban growth boundary to the south and east. The Committee further recommended that Council direct staff to have the City Attorney prepare a resolution regarding this matter for presentation to the Council at its next regular meeting. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COb�EE REPORT. CARRIED. Council: City of Renton Council President Briere presented a Committee of the Whole report Business Plan,2006-2011 recommending that the 5/11/2005 final draft of the 2006-2011 City of Renton Business Plan be adopted. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMTTTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Development Services: Council President Briere presented a Committee of the Whole report regarding Building Pertnit Fee Waiver the Vision House request for building pemut fee waiver for Children's Village. for Vision House Children's The Committee considered this request as part of its annual budget review of Village social service programs. Since this fee has already been paid,the Committee recommended that this referral be closed. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval Finance: Vouchers of Claim Vouchers 237490-237890 and two wire transfers totaling $2,729,972.60; arrd approval of Payroll Vouchers 57258-57501, one wire transfer,and 571 direct deposits totaling$1,893,022. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utility: Surface Water Utility Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending Civil Engineer III Hire up to concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the request to fill the Step E vacant Surface Water Utility Civil Engineer III position at up to Step E of the salary range. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COLJNCIL CONCUR IN TI�COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Communitv Services Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report Committee recommending concunence in the Mayor's appointment of Dawn Murin to the Appointment: Municipal Arts Municipal Arts Commission for a three-year term that expires 12/31/2007, Commission replacing Doug Kyes. MOVED BY NEI.SON,SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCiL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. May 23,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 196 Planning &Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Clawson presented a report Committee regarding abandoned shopping carts. The Committee recommended Development Services: concurrence in the staff recommendation to adopt the shopping cart regulations. Grocery Cart Abandonment The proposed regulations require that businesses with more than ten shopping carts prepare and file a plan with the City to prevent the illegal removal of carts from the business premises. The proposed regulations further seek to prevent the continued possession of illegally removed carts,and to prevent the accumulation of illegally removed carts on public or private properties. The proposed regulations allow the City to impound shopping carts, and charge a fine if the owner fails to pick up impounded carts after receiving verbal notice from the City. The Committee recommended that the shopping cart regulations be adopted, and that an ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. ' MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution#3755 A resolution was read approving the Wilkinson II Final Plat consisting of Plat:Wilkinson II, Shattuck approximately.94 acres located at 2245 Shattuck Ave. S. (FP-05-030). Ave S,FP-05-030 MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance#5138 An ordinance was read annexing approximately 27.5 acres generally bounded Annexation:Honey Creek by 126th Ave. SE on the west;Union Ave.NE on the east; SE 100th St., if East,Union Ave NE extended,on the north;and SE 102nd St. (NE 22nd St.)on the south(Honey Creek East Annexation). MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCII,ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5139 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification of property Annexation:Honey Creek annexed within the City of Renton generally bounded by 126th Ave. SE on the East,R-8 Zoning west;Union Ave.NE on the east;SE 100th St.,if extended,on the north; and SE 102nd St. (NE 22nd St.)on the south from R-6(Urban Residential-six dwelling units per acre;King County zoning)to R-8 (Residential-eight dwelling units per acre)zoning;Honey Creek East Annexation. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5140 An ordinance was read annexing approximately 26.14 acres generally located at Annexation: Maplewood East, the northwest corner of 156th Ave. SE and SE 136th St. (Maplewood East SE 136th St& 156th Ave SE Annexation). MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5141 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification of property Annexation:Maplewood East, annexed within the City of Renton generally located at the northwest corner of R-4 Zoning 1S6th Ave. SE and SE 136th St. from R-4(Urban Residential-four dwelling units per acre; King County zoning)to R-4(Residential-four dwelling units May 23,2005 Renton City Council Minutes PaQe 197 a per acre)zoning;Maplewood East Annexation. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCII.ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5142 An ordinance was read annexing in two phases approximately 133 acres Annexation:Merritt II, SE generally located south of SE May Valley Rd. and east of Coal Creek Parkway May Valley Rd&Coal Creek north of the existing City limits(Memtt II Annexation). MOVED BY Parkway CLAWSON,SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5143 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification of property Annexation:Merritt II,R-1 annexed within the City of Renton for approximately 67 acres located south of Zoning,Phase I(67 Acres) SE May Valley Rd. and east of Phase II from R-1 (Urban Residential-one dwelling unit per acre; King County zoning)to R-1 (Residential -one dwelling unit per acre)zoning;Merritt II Annexation,Phase I. MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5144 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification of property Annexation: Merritt II,R-4 annexed within the City of Renton for approximately 7.87 acres located in the Zoning,Phase I(7.87 Acres) vicinity of SE 100th Pl.,known as the Newcastle Terrace Subdivision,from R- 4(Urban Residential-four dwelling units per acre;King County zoning)to R-4 (Residential-four dwelling unit per acre)zoning; Merritt II Annexation,Phase I. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON,COTlNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL RECESS INTO AND ADJOURNMENT EXECUTNE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 30 MINUTES TO DISCUSS LITIGATION AND POTENTIAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION WTTH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 9:16 p.m. Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive session and the Council meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m. //w'C�' ( Michele Neumann,Deputy City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann May 23,2005 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR , ' Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 23, 2005 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 5/30 No Meeting(Memorial Day} (Briere) MON., 6/06 Emerging Issues 6:30 p.m. *Council Conference Room* Approximately Parks Maintenance Facility Update 7:00 p.m. *Council Chambers* COMMUNITY SERVICES (Nelson) FINANCE (Persson) PLANIVING&DEVELOPMENT THURS., 6/02 CANCELLED (Clawson) PUBLIC SAFETY MON., 6/06 Fire Department Cross-Staffing (Law) 5:30 p.m. TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THLTRS., 5/26 Agreement with WSDOT for I-405 Right- (Palmer) 3:00 p.m. of-Way Plans Using HLJD BEDI Grant Funds; School Zone Traffic Signage; SR-169 Route Development Plan and Corridor Study Agreement with WSDOT THURS., 6/02 Renaming Garden Ave. N.; 3:00 p.m. South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements(briefing only) UTILITIES THCIRS., 6/02 Latecorner Agreement Request for Merrill (Corman) 4:00 p.m. Gardens @ Renton Centre; Latecomer Agreement Request for Liberty Grove NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. Ali other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. • • CERTIFICATE E�ibit F l,the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Renton,Washington,certify that this is a true correct copy of u '1 A?i,auf�s '��o �ooy. Subscribed and sealed this6 day o`f7J� cu��--,20OS �S-�.� �. G!/�.G�- RENTON CITY COUNCIL City Cterl: Regular Meeting December 20,2004 Council Chambers Monday,730 p.m. M I N U T E S Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF DON PERSSON,Council President;MARCIE PALMER;TERRI BRIERE; �. COUNCILMEMBERS DETTIS LAW;TONI NELSON. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY NEI.SON,COUNCII.,EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS DAN CLAWSON AND RANDY CORMAN. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER-�VHEELER,Mayor;JAY COVINGTON,Chief ATTENDANCE Administrative Officer;LAWRENCE J.WARREN,City Attorney;BONNIE WALTON,City Clerk;GREGG ZIIvIl��RMAN,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator;SANDRA MEYER,Transportation Systems Director; 1VICK AFZALI,Transportation Planning and Programming Supervisor;ALEX PIETSCH,Economic Development Administrator;DON ERICKSON,Senior Planner;SHAWNA MLTLHALL,Development Manager;NORMA MCQIJII.LER,Neighborhood Coordinator;VICTORIA RUNHI.,E,Finance and Information Services Administrator;DEREK TODD,Assistant to the CAO; CI�EF LEE WHEELER and FIRE MARSHAUBATTALION CHIEF STAN ENGLER,Fire Department;COMMANDER CHARLES MARSALISI,Police Depamnent. SPECIAL Norma McQuiller,Neighborhood Coordinator,expressed her pleasure in � PRESENTATIONS working with residents in association with the Neighborhood Program She EDNSP:2004 Neighborhood stated that the partnership between the City and the residents produces positive Grant Awards results in the neighborhoods. Ms.McQuiller presented certificates of appreciation to the 2004 Neighborhood Grant Award(second round)recipients for neighborhood projects such as common area improvements,urban park development,entranceway improvements,and traffic circle landscaping. The eight grant recipients included Emerald Garden Homeowners Association, Falcon Ridge Homeowners Association,Honey Creek Ridge Homeowners Association,LaCrosse Homeowners Association,Maplewood Gardens Neighborhood Association,Monterey Terrace Neighborhood Association, Talbot Hill Neighborhood Association,and Winsper Homeowners Association. In addition,Ms McQuiller announced that the Maplewood Glen Neighborhood Association and Summerwind Homeowners Association received administrative newsletter grants. WSDOT:I-405/SR-167 CYaig Stone,I-405 Project Manager for the Washington State Department of Corridor Improvements Transportation(WSDOT),provided an update on the I-405 corridor and SR- Update 167 interchange improvements. He reported that through the 2003 approved statewide"nickel package"(funded by the five cent gas tax),the Renton area receives$136,000,000 for these improvements. The funded improvements include the addition of a northbound I-405 lane from West Valley Hwy.to the SR-167 interchange,the addition of a southbound I-405 lane from Maple Valley Hwy.to SR-167,and the exiension of the southbound HOV lane from the SR-167 interchange. Stating that engineering has commenced for these December 20,2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 455 . improvements and the environmental review has begun, Mr. Stone announced . . an open house on 1/27/2005 at the IKEA Perfornung Arts Center on the environmental issues associated with the proposed road improvements. Continuing,Mr. Stone explained that the I-405 Master Plan is a 20-year vision of multi-modal improvements to the I-405 corridor and arterials, stretching from Tukwila to Lynnwood. The challenge involves taking the long-term vision,breaking it into projects,and obtaining funding. Mr. Stone described some Renton-area unfunded projects,which are part of the overall master plan. One project entails replacing the SR-167 cloverleaf interchange with direction ramps resulting in two interchanges for the City of Renton at Lind Ave. SW and Talbot Rd. S. He pointed out that the subject project options are being reviewed,including the potential widening of I-405 to the south that would affect adjacent businesses and homes,and the improvements to Benson Rd. S. In regards to Renton Hill,Mr. Stone reviewed options for this area,pointing out that I-405 will be widened to the west. He indicated that issues related to access points to Renton Hill, including emergency vehicle access,will continue to be reviewed. Mr. Stone also reviewed Liberty Park,Cedar River Park,and City wells access issues. He noted that in order to obtain a defined solution,all of these elements-Renton Hill,parks,and well access -have to work together. Mr.Stone stated that funding is available to fully construct the nickel projects and to carry out a five percent design of the previously discussed elements. However,resources are not available to conduct a full environmental review until another funding package is put forward. In conclusion,Mr.Stone reported that WSDOT will continue to meet with the Renton Hill and Talbot Hill communities,and keep residents up-to-date on the I-405 Corridor Program Noting the di�culty of this process,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler acknowledged WSDOT's goal of ensuring that the designs for short-term improvements do not negatively affect the long-term improvements and waste money. PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Lindberg, 138th accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the Ave��nd St public meeting to consider the 10%Notice of Intent petition for the proposed Lindberg Annexation,consisting of 10.11 acres,including the abutting street right-of-way,located east of 138th Ave. SE(Duvall Ave. NE)and north of SE 132nd St. (NE 2nd St.). Don Erickson,Senior Planner,reported that nine single-family dwellings exist on this relatively flat site. The site is served by Fire District#25 and the Renton School District,and is within the Renton water,Water District#90,and Renton sewer service areas. Mr.Erickson stated that site's zoning under King County is R-4(four dwelling units per gross acre);and Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Residential Single Family,for which R-8(eight dwelling units per net acre)zoning is proposed. Mr.Erickson indicated that the annexation proposal is generally consistent with Boundary Review Board criteria,noting that the City's boundary is interim pending other annexations within its Potential Annexation Area. He reported that the fiscal impact analysis indicates a surplus of$8,580 at full development, and an estimated one-time park development cost of$35,383. He concluded that the proposed annexation furthers City business goals,and is consistent with December 20,2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 456 Renton policies. Noting some potential flooding in the area, Mr.Erickson suggested mitigation with future development. Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL ACCEPT THE LINDBERG ANNEXATION 10°lo NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX PETITION AND AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF THE 60°Io DIRECT PETTTION TO ANNEX, SPECIFYING THAT PROPERTY OWNERS SUPPORT FUTURE ZONIIVG CONSISTENT WTTH RENTON'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION AND PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUME A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S EXISTING OLTTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. ' PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation:Park Terrace,NE accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the 8th St&Duvall Ave NE public hearing to consider the 60°Io Notice of Intent petition to annex and R-8 zoning for the proposed 7.65-acre Park Tenace Annexation,including the abutting street right-of-way,located east of Duvall Ave. NE and south of NE 8th St.,if extended. Senior Planner pon Erickson explained that the subject site slopes upward from the southeast comer to the northeast corner at a three percent slope,and contains 17 single-family dwellings on an existing 23-lot plat. He noted that roadway improvements aze likely in the future. Regarding the public services, he stated that the site is served by Fire District#25,Water District#90,Renton sewer,and the Renton School District. Continuing,Mr.Erickson pointed out that existing King County zoning is R-4 (four dwelling units per gross acre). Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates this azea as Residential Single Family,and concurrent zoning is R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre). He indicated that the fiscal analysis revealed a deficit of$2,646 at full development,assuming a potential of 23 single-family homes and an assessed new home value of$350,000. The estimated one-time parks acquisition and development cost is$19,477. Mr.Erickson reported that the annexation proposal is generally consistent with Renton policies and Boundary Review Board criteria. Some potential flooding is possible in the area,and he suggested mitigation with future development. In conclusion,he stated that the proposal serves the best interests and general welfare of the City. Public comment was invited. There being none,it was MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCII.CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY PALMER,COUNCII.ACCEPT THE PARK TERRACE 60%DIRECT PETTTION TO ANNEX, AND ALTTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO TRANSMIT THE NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD AND PREPARE A REZONE ORDINANCE FROM KING COUNTY'S R-4 ZONE TO RENTON'S R-8 ZONE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DESIGNATION. CARRIED. December 20,2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 457 ADMI1vISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work , programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2004 and beyond. Items noted included: � The 3rd Annual Canine Candy Cane Sk Run or Walk was held on December l lth,with 175 dogs and masters participating in the activities. � Currently,there is a problem at Boeing Field created by small glass beads embedded in painted runway markings coming loose and lodging in the engines of some Boeing aircraft. There will be some additional landings and departures of 737 aircraft at the Renton Airport over the next several days while this problem is being resolved at Boeing Field. AUDIENCE COMMENT Jeff Davis, 10012 64th Ave. S., Seattle,98178, stated that he represents the' Citizen Comment: Davis- Aircraft Owners'and Pilots'Association on Renton's Airport Advisory Airport Runway Protection Committee,and commended the City for its land use actions pertaining to the Zones Airport. He reported that the Airport community is taking active steps to be a better community member,and the City and Airport community are working together in that regazd. Mr. Davis ppinted out that the Airport is a valuable City asset,and despite a recent tragedy,the Airport has an excellent safety record. He encouraged the City to address runway protection zones,especially on the south end of the field,so as to enhance the safety of the Airport and enhance economic growth and development of the City. Citizen Comment: Johnson- Brian Johnson, 14509 SE 167th St.,Renton,98058,spoke on the topic of the Fairwood Incorporation proposed Fairwood incorporation,noting the adversarial quotes in the newspaper. He expressed his wish to be within a city,due to the decrease of services from King County, and said discussions with affected community members led to the determinadon that there was support for incorporation. Mr. Johnson requested that the City review the information on the Fairwood incorporation website(www.fairwoodtaskforce.org), and emphasized his desire to be within a city, such as Renton, if the feasibility study proves that incorporation is not viable. Citizen Comment: Carras- Greg Carras, 15944 SE 177th St.,Renton,98058,said he is a member of the Fairwood Incorporation Fairwood incorporation task force,and noted that information was gathered and public meetings`were held on the incorporation effort. Mr.Carras reported that the conununity supports incorporation if financially viable,and explained how the proposed incorporation boundary was determined. He noted the issues surrounding the Cascade Vista area,which was not included in the incorporation area,and proposed that the City and the task force work together to address the deficiencies in this area. Citizen Comment: Mandt- Marleen Mandt, 1408 N.26th St.,Renton,98055,reported there is a lack of Gene Coulon Park,Allowing safe places to walk dogs in the lower Kennydale area,due to the presence of Pets traffic and bicycles. She requested that on-leash dogs be allowed on the walking paths at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park and at Kennydale Beach, and proposed a trial period during the winter months. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of December 13, 2004. Council concur. December 13,2004 December 20>2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 458 CAG: 04-143,2004 Lift City Clerk reported bid opening on 12/14/2004 for CAG-04-143,2004 Lift Station Rehabilitation,RL Alia Station Rehabilitation Project(Lake Washington Flush Station and Misty Cove Company Lift Station);nine bids;engineer's estimate$119,897.60;and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to low bidder,R.L.Alia Company,in the amount of$118,809.60. Council concur. Plat: Maureen Highlands Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions,of the Division II,NE 4th St,FP-04- Maureen Highlands Division II Final Plat; 31 single-family lots on 14.2 acres 12g located at 6118 NE 4th St. (FP-04-128). Council concur. (See page 460 for resolution.) Planning: 2004 Annual Update Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department of Zoning Book&Wall Map recommended approval of the 2004 annual update of the City's Zoning Book and Wall Map. Council concur. (See page 460 for ordinance.) 'y MOVED BY PERSSON,SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Conespondence was read from Madonna Messina,221 S Lyons Ave.NE, Citizen Comment:Messina- Renton, 98059,expressing support for a 50%or greater permanent open space R-1 Zone Community requirement in the City's Urban Separators. MOVED BY NEI,SON, Separators SECONDED BY PALMER,COtTNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. UNFITtISHED BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report Planning&Develoument regarding the pre-application for the 2005 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Committee review cycle for property located at 4915 NE Sunset Blvd. The Committee Comp Plan: 2005 Amendment recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to deny the pre- Pre-Application,4915 NE application request for a Comprehensive Plan map amendment from Single Sunset Blvd Family Residential to Corridor Commercial at 4915 NE Sunset Blvd.based on the finding that the application is not timely,and that development of the property for commercial uses dces not meet the intent of the Corridor Commercial designation. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMIT'TEE REPORT. CARRIED. Airport:Noise Mitigation Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report (Compatible Land Use recommending adoption,by resolution,of the Renton Airport Compatible Land �'ogj'�) Use Program. The program will serve as a means to inform the citizens of Renton about Airport noise,safety,and other aviation-generated issues. It can be provided to Renton Airport-based pilots and businesses so that they are informed of citizens concerns in relation to aviation issues. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 460 for resolution.) Planning: Planning& Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a clean-up report Development Committee for the following�ve items listed on the Committee's refenal list and Agenda Item Clean Up Report recommended that the refenals be closed: 1. Referra1920-Periodic Review of Residential Land Use Policies and Implementation. This recurring refenal is no longer necessary since agenda bills are now being created for all new referrals. 2. Referral 1176-Historic Preservation Society, Historic Preservation Regulations. There is no current work being done on this issue. December 2Q,2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 459 3. Referral 1941 -City Center Area Sign Code Regulations Amendments, Roof Signs. These regulations were adopted by the City Council via Ordinance 5071. 4. Referral 2004-R-4 Zone Text Amendments,Landscape Requirements. This was included in the Comprehensive Plan ordinance that was adopted by the City Council on 11/1/2004. 5. Referra12040-Design Guidelines in the Commercial Neighborhood Zone. This matter will be addressed as part of a larger work program that will be brought forward in 2005. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CONCUR IN TI-� COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. . Committee on Committees Council President-elect Briere presented a revised Committee on Committees Council: 2005 Committee report recommending the following Council committee chairmanships and Assignments committee assignments for 2005: Community Services Corrunittee: Toni Nelson,Chair;Marcie Palmer,Vice Chair;Dan Clawson,Member. Finance Committee: Don Persson,Chair;Toni Nelson, Vice Chair;Denis Law, Member. Planning and Development Committee: Dan Clawson,Chair;Denis Law,Vice Chair;Marcie Palmer,Member. Public Safety Committee: Denis Law,Chair;Randy Corman,Vice Chair;Toni Nelson,Member. Transportation(Aviation)Committee: Marcie Palmer, Chair;Don Persson, Vice Chair;Randy Corman,Member. Utilities Committee: Randy Corman,Chair;Dan Clawson,Vice Chair;Don Persson,Member. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PALMER,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Clawson presented a report recommending Utility: Sewer Service concurrence in the staff recommendation to revise City Code to allow Connection Outside City administrative approval of sewer service outside the City limits within the Limits,City Code Amend City's adopted Potential Annexation Area(PAA),approved sanitary sewer service area,or within the boundary of a Special Assessment District of the City,subject to the following conditions: 1. A covenant be executed that obligates the property owner to a�rmatively m t►1,Ll�e S support any legal and constitutional method of annexation for properties �e� within the City's adopted PAA;and i— 2. Any proposed development must be in general compliance with the City of �'�,��er T� Renton land use regulations. ��.� f�b,r.� nQ yp 5 The Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter � � 1 be presented for first reading. MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY PALMER,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 460 for ordinance.) December 20,2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 460 RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution#3728 A resolution was read approving the Maureen Highlands Division II Final Plat; Plat: Maureen Highlands approximately 14.2 acres located in the vicinity of 6118 NE 4th St.,north of NE Division II,NE 4th St,FP-04- 4th St. (FP-04-128). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PALMER, 12g COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3729 A resolution was read recognizing the role of the Renton Municipal Airport as Airport:Noise Mitigation an essential public facility,and authorizing the adoption of the Renton Airport (Compatible Land Use Compatible Land Use Program. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY Program) PALMER,COLJNCIL ADOPT TI�RESOLIITION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the. Council meeting of 1/3/2005 for second and final reading: � Planning: 2004 Annual Update An ordinance was read adopting the 2004 amendments to the zoning of Zoning Book&Wall Map classifications of properties located within the City of Renton. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 1/3/2005. CARRIED. Utility: Sewer Service An ordinance was read amending Section 4-6-040.0 of Chapter 6,Street and Connection Outside City Utility Standards,of Title N(Development Regulations)of City Code by Limits,City Code Amend revising policies by which the City allows connection to its sanitary sewer system by property owners outside of the current City limits. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 1/3/2005. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance#5110 An ordinance was read adopting the annual City of Renton Budget for the year Budget: 2005 Annual City of 2005 in the total amount of$150,349,200. MOVED BY BRIERE, Renton SECONDED BY PALMER, COIJNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5111 An ordinance was read establishing the property tax levy for the year 2005 for Budget: 2005 Property Tax both general purposes and for voter approved bond issues. MOVED BY LAW, ��y SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5112 An ordinance was read amending Section 8-2-2,Storm and Surface Water Budget: Water, Sewer&King Drainage,Sections 8-4-24 and 8-4-31 of Chapter 4,Water, and Section 8-5-15 County Water Treatment Rates of Chapter 5,Sewers,of Title VIlI(Health and Sanitation)of City Code by increasing sanitation fees. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY PALMER, COLJNCIL ADOPT THE ORDIlVANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: FOUR AYES: PALMER,BRIERE,LAW,NELSON;ONE NAY: PERSSON. CARRIED. Ordinance#5113 An ordinance was read amending Sections 5-1-2.C,D,and J of Chapter 1,Fee Budget: Photocopy, Schedule,of Title V(Finance and Business Regulations)of City Code by AudioNideo Recording& increasing photostatic copies,audio/video recordings,business license lists,and Facsimile Copies Fees facsimiles fees. MOVED BY LAW,SECONDED BY PALMER,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. December 20,2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 461 Ordinance#5114 An ordinance was read amending Section 5-1-6.B of Chapter 1,Fee Schedule, Budget: City Center Parking of Title V (Finance and Business Regulations) of City Code by offering a Garage Rates reduced monthly rate to park in the City Center Parking garage and in City surface parking lots for a minimum lease period. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5115 An ordinance was read increasing the 2005 Renton Community Center and Budget: Community Center& Senior Activity Center rental rates. MOVED BY LAW,SECONDED BY Senior Center Rental Rates NELSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5116 An ordinance was read increasing the 2005 Carco Theatre rental rates. Budget: Carco Theatre Rental MOVED BY LAW,SECONDED BY NELSON,COIJNCIL ADOPT THE; Rates ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5117 An ordinance was read establishing a jail booking fee between government Budget: Jail Booking Fees agencies and individuals in the amount of$64.83. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5118 An ordinance was read providing for the 20U4 yeaz-end Budget adjustments in Budget: 2004 Year-End the total amount of$13,213,500. MOVED BY LAW,SECONDED BY Adjustments NELSON,COi1NCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: Ai"T"AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5119 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of the Kennydale Rezone: Kennydale Elementary School property from R-8 (Residential Single Family,eight Elementary School,NE 28th dwelling units per acre)to R-8 with a P-suffix designation attached;6.68 acres St,R-8 to R-8(P),R-04-101 located at 1700 NE 28th St.;R-04-101. MOVED BY LAW,SECONDED BY PALMER,COUNCII,ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: AT•T•AYES. CARRIED. � NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman Briere announced that Councilman Law will serve on the SCA: Issues Committee Suburban Cities Association's Issues Committee. Representative(Law) Council: Certificate of Councilwoman Briere presented a certificate of appreciation to Don Persson in Appreciation to Don Persson, recognition of his outstanding service to the City and the Renton community as 2004 Council President President of the City Council during 2004. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:55 p.m. ��• G�G�..�� Bonnie I.Walton,CMC,City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann December 20,2004 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 20,2004 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COl��IMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 12/27 CANCELLED (Briere) MON., 1/03 Emerging Issues 6:00 p.m. *Council Conference Room Approximately Pavilion Building Proposal 6:30 p.m. *Council Chambers* COMMUNITY SERVICES (Nelson) FIlVANCE (Persson) PL,ANNING&DEVELOPMENT (Clawson) PUBLIC SAFETY MON., 1/03 Vehicle Noise Levels (Law) 5:30 p.m. TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) (Palmer) UTII.ITIES (Corman) N07'E: Committee of the Whole meedngs are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are heid in the Council Confereuce Room unless otherwise noted. � Exhibit C � King Count� Department of Assessments Scott Noble King County Administration Bldg. S00 Fourth Avenue,Room 708 Assessor Seattle,WA 98104-2384 (20�296-5195 FAX(20�296-0595 Emnil:asses.cor.info(a�metrokc.gov www.metrokc.gov/assessor/ ANNEXA�TIDN PETITION CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERZ�'Y that the petition submitted March 1, 2005 to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton of the properties described as the Lindberg Annexation, has been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of Revised Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002. The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to be the case. ' Dated this 7� day of March, 2005 �� Scott Noble, King C unty Assessor �og1202M ° Exhibit D LINDBERG ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPT'ION The Southeast quarter(1/4)of the Northeast quarter(1/4)of the Northwest quarter(1/4) of Section 15,Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., King County,Washington; EXCEPT the north 186.15 feet of the west 234 feet thereof; and EXCEPT that portion for Road(138`h Avenue SE); � � TOGETHER WITH Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 881050, as recorded under King County Rec. No. 8201220536,records of King County,Washington, in the Northwest quarter(1/4)of the Northeast quarter(1/4)of said Section 15; and TOGETHER WTTH the south 100 feet of the west 190 feet of the north half(1/2)of the Southwest quarter(1/4)of the Northwest quarter(1/4)of the Northeast quarter(1/4)of said Section 15; and TOGETI�R WIT'H the east 30 feet of the west 220 feet of the south � 30 feet of said subdivision; and TOGETHER W1TH that portion of 140`t'Ave SE in the south half(1/2)of the Southwest quarter(1/4)of the Northwest quarter(1/4)of the Northeast quarter(1/4)of said Section 15; and TOGE1'HER WITH that portion of SE 132"d Street in said subdivisions lying westerly of the east line of said Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 881050 extended southerly,to the south line of said subdivision;and TOGETHER WTTH that portion of SE 132°a Street in the Southwest yuarter(1/4)of the Northeast quarter(1/4)of said Section 15,lying westerly of the east line of said Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 8201220536 extended southerly,to the southerly right-of- way margin of SE 132°d Street, and lying easterly of the easterly right-of-way margin of 140`h Ave SE extended northerly, to the�north line of said subdivision. w �� a, � � Q z � a� > � ¢ � E 4t St � � � th w w � � � � � cfl o0 �' E 1 n d t r- � w I a� � Q Q � > � Q -�-, o � � d- �- � SE 136th St w � � > Q � � Proposed Lindberg Annexation o Soo l000 Exhibit F1: Proposed Annexation Boundary — Cit Limits 1 : 6000 �. Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �� y � p'�ex Pietsch,Admmistrator 0 proposed Annex.Area G.DelRosano AN.r 6 June 2005 i ==_=_== = _:=_ = __ _ ________ ==__ � ___ _ _ = =_= _= =_ __=_= i = -= __ _ _ = - - � -_ --_ _ - -= D � _______ ____ _ ______ _ ___ _ = ___ ____ _ ____ _______ _ ______ __ ___ , ; -___- _ _ __ _ __________ � --- =-== _ - o . , __= _ � � � � i ;r a � , . � L � � ' . . Proposed L�ndberg Annexat�on o S000 l0000 Exhibit F2: Existing Corporate Limits ♦� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning - - - City Limits � . `0000 � p'lex Pietsch,Administraar 0 Proposed Annex.Area V C.Del Rosario .r0 6 June 2005 i == === = ==-== = , ____ =_- _ _ =_-_ _ 2 � � -- - �. � ==_ _ _ ___ = -= = _ , __ _______________ ________ = =_-_-__ = = = o . ---= _- _ �� ________________� y "}-'' � � I 24' I p � ''��'. � ` 4 � E � 2 � 'pe�� NE 4ih 51. SE 128 St � d Mcy� S A' t Wa '1E � W��n S 2nd 51 y �` a � yp 90, �J � SW 7M St � n WaY '� � SW�� Rmton Yily N �(y�' �' II � �'A d � t TuNwia kMy 3 781 167 < Strander Bivd - � � + � � 515 3 - a < � � B SW31hSt � � $ SE PetroNtsky Rd SW 41st St. S 18p1h 5 179 SW 47rd SL S 4 QD a J� � � Y 3 � wOV � y��95 `oye Proposed Lindberg Annexation o S000 l0000 Exhibit F3: Major Streets and Major Physical Features ♦OEconomic Development,Neighborhoods&SUategic Planning - - - C11Y LIfTIItS j • "0000 � p'�ex Pietsch,Administrator 0 Proposed Annex.Area G.Del Rosario t� .T 6)ime 2005 _=_`__=__=`== -====-==== = '= � ' - O => =--=== =--= = _______ _____________ STATION _ ______________ _______________ ________ _ __ 12 i -__- - _ _ ==____: ; __ __ ____ ____ ___ . � S ATION 0 11 . � STATION �� 16 � STATION � 13 ' STAT ON 4 = . Fire District 40 � ( G� �i e District 37 Proposed Lindberg Annexation o S000 l0000 Exhibit F4a: Fire Service Area Boundaries ♦OEconomic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning - - - City Limits l . V O�O� � Alez Pietsch,Administrazor 0 Proposed Annex.Area G.Del Rosario .i0 b 1we 2005 - COALCREEK D - - = UTILITY DISTRICT _ >---== ___ -`_ - = - ` ===_ > _-_____= c,zsx�s.s�oo� � `� ----_ ---" '---- --=---=--- - ----- -=` � -->---_=__=' _ = - -=_-_ __ , `-= '_- = ` = ` � __________ _________ _- ` D . A ER SKYW Y WAT I T CT 90 AND SEWER �-2 ISTRICT�zos-n2- rn , � sen R DE i (� I I � I I w WA KA.AAAPLEWOOD MDfT10N WATER � OF ��''� ' CEDAR RIVER WATER AND ��0� SEWER DIST. ' ' �sss-2��o� - I � SOOS CREEK WATER AND CITY OF KENT SEWER DISTRICT (253-85Cr5600) - (253-630-9900) I Q Proposed Lindberg Annexation o S000 l0000 Exhibit F4b: Sewer Service Area Boundaries Economic Development,Neighborhoods&SVategic Planning - - - Clty LIfi11I5 1 . V o000 �.♦ Alex Pietsch.Administrator G.Del Rosario � Proposed Annex.Area A .T 6 June 2005 - - - _ = __ � -- _ - - COAL CRff1C -_"_=-_< -=`_= == = -> _____ _ WAT6t b SEWER DIST. _-____=_-�_____: `-= ` -- auw�oa BRYN MAWR - �==-=-- =-----=------ ----= --=-- � LAKBtDGE -=- =---- -- -= = ----= - = WATER & ="=__ = = . SEWER DIST. `_ `- ---- an-,�a SKYWAY WATER A� �� AND SEWER DISTRICT p I a�� A1H 09T. SFATiIE WA19!DBT. pw-Q74 � 1 ASMETA 1 Als A'fIN{ �A �w�� WA74 C0019AiIVE �2� WII pF C'EDAR RIVER TINCWLA WAT�t AI� SEWER DIST. w>.sa os�avm . I S00S CR�C WATHt AI� SEWER DISTRICT �� CITY OF KENT a�� i Proposed Lindberg Annexation o 4500 9000 Exhibit F4c: Water Service Area Boundaries ♦OEconomic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning - - - City Limits � . 54000 + '°'�ex Pietsch.Administrator 0 Proposed Annex.Area G.Del Rosario .�O 6 June 2005 - - :== _=__ _ _ = o � _.= __-__ _== _ - _ =_ _______ ____ __ __ ______ __ _ ____ ___ � =____ __ _ _ _ ____ -_ _- � � � -_ _______ _____ _______ o : � � , __ __ � . ► 0 _ � 0 � � � _ . � . � r- L ! � � � , � , � �� I Q � � ; Proposed Lindberg Annexation o S000 l0000 Exhibit F5: K.C. UGA and Renton PAA ♦OEconomic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning - - - City Limits 1 . �ODO� � A�ex Pietsch,Adminisnator 0 Proposed Annex.Area C.Del Rosario .f0 6 lune 2005 =___=__-==:`=______=_ = - _____->_ ==:__ � -`_=_ '_` ==>=== C7 0 � i :, r „ � � � L Proposed Lindberg Annexation o S000 l0000 Exhibit G: Proposed Corporate Limits Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning - - - City Limits � . V o000 ♦O♦ AlexPietsch,Administrator G.DeI Rosario � Proposed Annex.Area A 6 June 2005 � ��■■� !,� "�II�� _ � � :;, . s � � � � � � � � � � � _ � �� • � � ..� �► �" �— ♦ •� i n . � � � ■ c � � � � � � � / � r C � / : :; � _ ti i � � � � � _ � _ _ � .�► � ::� _ � � .; ! � � � � � . � _ __ . ::::.. � _ � � 1 .. ■ ! . :: :... - - � :::ti::: _ . � 1 � . �::��: ::.. h � � . . �. � ::., 1 � . � - . � � � � � � � .� . ::ti.: , E � � , . . -, ::r , . � . , � . . ::�:: . � -,� � 1 � :�: , ��r�:: . . � / i � �.ti. '11 . ■ � ,� � '�.ti.: -- .� ` - ; '�.ti:. � � - - � � � _ , � 1 „ i � � � -1 � n r � � - � . e - r � � . - � � I l� .1.�_ ..�.,� .. � � 11 . � 1 1 1 :::ti:. - � ::��:: - - - - . � �.�. ir . lE__ :::ti::. :::::;: �■ �� - ■ ■ :�:�i��:�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>::�:��:::::::::_�::::::�::�:::::�::��:::�::��::::�:::: _ � � 11 1 � 1 � � - � - - - � � � , � 1 1 1 - - :� , � :�ti�.'�.ti•: O.:�' �� = •��}5�••• �:�.'�. � '•.y�..ti!•�• - .,.�, :h: ' _ ' ;'' ;}. :.��;. � ••1:• ::' � :.}., � ��•:tiyi:s:: ::..'•:` "' ' •.•�'� . �• - ��::: ' - _ :.'��1; " _ :}�N� . - 11 :��•�i'Ji• ��ti.!�.j�: __ :��• _ :.;�} ti•3,: , _ ' ' _ _ " J'�.''`d:�.� ::�.i . ` �, ` ` � � ' � �j �� , , � , ��•�I i , , , � .� � :•T i ti•:: � - I - � � , � ■ � �� ,: � .►„ ■ . . _ . ► �I�� f :.s: � . - — � � � �i ::.:::::::::::::::::.: __ ::�- __ � ��:�:� :::;: . � - � �i :a;• :::;;: . �r� � . �� ' ♦• � :7:�: :�.::�.:�:�:;�-:��:��::�`;3; ��,` ` � � � is;; ��::;:;i;i;i;:�::;�:�;;:::�:;,: , ��d :::::::::: i� ■ r• ► - ::f::::;:: � ::�.:: � ::�: ::�::: ..�,;.::;�:: . ;�: :•:;.�;•:,�: � � . -- s; I� � � _ ■ //11 :�:: :�:..:...: � �� _ :: ::�f:: _ __::�:: :.� ♦ .. :::,:. � � � _ � ♦ �► 1�► ► � I/�� :,:: :::.:: ::_�:::::�� ♦ � � • �::;_ .::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::::�:::�:::::f::�.. ♦ i /�� ♦ ,::`: _ _-- ..: .. :.� � �' '�'f'� �i�:': :;�;;��? 111� ■ �' I j:� :.f �� .�� , �I ::::: ::y{:};2;:;:;:>;:;:fi:°:�:;';:�:;';'.;:':;:°•,'.a:'.•'.•aa I,,�� •o r.• ..•.•3�e•..s �� I� ■ � :: �::�: ...::.,::::.__::::::::::::::;::.:::::.:.:...:.:,.. ■ .. .. 1�� :,::::;��:�::::::::::_:� - ::::.::..::::::::::::a:, .,�� '�':::_J�ii1.�. •�.��:��J.�:.•i�'i i�'i�'i' �� '� •.•iY::•:•i•�::•i a �':L'e%'.•:':J�i!��:'i'.:::'•❖i'J •��J��7 - •-r�.p - _ - __ _ �9!:!iS_"_c" ' S� ✓ ' - �•f�s ::y, - •>:� •��r�: - -- - - - •r•. %'_.�::s��::�:�:�'�.. .i'4 � ?;i;. . ��r.r.'r'% - v.: - ■ �:•i:�: •�� vr: r' 'rv. -- .'r`'• ��'� :f:: r.%r.�:•r.•�.••.•.-.-:::�:❖ ■ "}ss• ..•f:�%':' • .ef•. e•: e'efr. .e.a........... � � �°'r. .r r..•r. '•r o �: ::`: � .•.,r..,�,...,..,.. , .�. .a: ��R. :yi,�... }. �.•.e. ✓ �r'v.so � , r. 'J. l ��1 1._:•:':.�.SL•':l� i i':'i .s � � •..} 3i� .r' '•�•%'�'� �� •'�'-�-"--._..r� _ . .� . .r.' :•i�: 'f .�. r r.... . r�ti • ..r:..,.�:�:�:�:�:�5: , � ' .W.•' 1:sti. .,�..�, •e,�..r.$r.,.r.,.v❖. � ro .f�'� �'•�•. ❖e.�. .'Ja'•:' :.L r�: .`: .'r.: �r�'•'�'�' h -�-,-��` r•r...'r .r: �,v. '.��r •,.=.�.t .�.rs s•}��[ - - '�r..r_.1__._�- � :�._�.s•�..•��..__.�_i':�::�s:�'••:�•%��,'��':f:�.::1-yy'�{�a��%a.��-�._-_-_.y,�..�'w'.s•.6'Kti�� i � � � � • � - - ' . � - �- � . � :•,>;::.;_:>:>.�>>::<•:<�>:•ss:::::�:�::;<•s:•s:�;::� _ - , ...... . �<>;;�:;�:;;�:�;:;�: • • I I `' . � .� � .� _ .. �., � � �� •� �, ';,' � , ;; . CITY OF RENTON � Economic Development,Neighborhoods and — Strategic Planning Kathy Keolker-Wheeler,Mayor Alex Pietsch,Administrator September 15,2005 Lenora Blauman, Executive Secretary Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County Yesler Building, Suite 402 400 Yesler Way Seattle,WA 98104 Subject: Lindberg Annexation Legal Description Dear Ms.Blauman: Enclosed please find the third correction of the legal for this annexation. We are somewhat perplexed regarding this and other legal descriptions the City of Renton has recently prepared for the Board pursuant to RCW 35A.14120. As you lrnow, our staff has been preparing legals for annexatioris for over twenty years and it has only been recently that a number of these have been questioned. We are not opposed to the County Roads Services Division making corrections but a number of these appear to be superfluous, e.g. the addition of historical road names, for example. In the case of the Lindberg Annexation, after having made two previous corrections, County Road staff apparently decided that there were additional corrections they had missed or now wanted. Our Public Works staff has informed me that some of the corrections requested may, in fact, be incorrect. They cite one example where the Country Roads Services Division request would have placed the same piece of property in the legal description twice. Rather than see this annexation held up again, they have agreed to provide the attached legal pursuant to the County Roads Services Division's requested changes, even though they do not support them. Since there apparently is more than one correct way to prepare a legal description,we would like to suggest that County staff put out a preferred format that we and other cities and agencies co�ld follow. Also, it would be most helpful, if the County Road Services Division personnel reviewing annexation legals consolidated their requested corrections into a single request,rather than multiple requests, as we have experienced recently with the Lindberg Annexation and other annexations. We hope the County Road Division staff will look at these suggestions in a positive light. We are arixious to find a solution that works for everyone and facilitate 120-day review process, as set forth in RCW 36.93150 Sincer � . Donald K.Erickson,AICP� Senior Planner/Strategic Planning cc: Dave Christensen Rick Brater,DOT/RSD—Engineering Services R E N T O N 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 �This paper contains 50%recyded material,30%post consumer �H E A D O F T H E C U R V E LINDBERG ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Southeast quarter (1/4) of the Northeast quarter(1/4) of the Northwest quarter(1/4) of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; EXCEPT the north 186.15 feet of the west 234 feet thereof; and EXCEPT that portion for Road (138�'Avenue SE); TOGETHER WTTH Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 881050, as recorded under King County Rec. No. 8201220536, records of King County,Washington, in the Northwest quarter(1/4) of the Northeast quarter(1/4) of said Section 15; and TOGETHER WTTH the south 100 feet of the west 190 feet of the north half(1/2) of the Southwest quarter(1/4) of the Northwest quarter (1/4) of the Northeast quarter(1/4) of said Section 15; and TOGETHER WITH the east 30 feet of the west 220 feet of the south 30 feet of said subdivision; and TOGETHER WTTH that portion of 140`h Ave SE in the south half(1/2) of the Southwest quarter(1/4) of the Northwest quarter (1/4) of the Northeast quarter(1/4) of said Section 15; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of SE 132nd Street in said subdivision, lying westerly of the east line of said Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 881050 extended southerly, to the south line of said subdivision; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of SE 132"d Street in the Southwest quarter(1/4) of the Northeast quarter (1/4) of said Section 15, lying westerly of the east line of said Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 881050 extended southerly, to the southerly right-of-way margin of SE 132"d Street, and lying easterly of the easterly right-of-way margin of 140tn Ave SE extended northerly, to the north line of said subdivision; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of right-of-way located at the southeast corner of th� intersection of 140`�'Ave SE and SE 132°d Street in the Southwest quarter(1/4) of the Northeast quarter(1/4) of said Section 15, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said subdivision; Thence S 88°21'10" E, along the north line of said subdivision, a distance of 62 feet; Thence S 00°31'45"W, a distance of 30 feet, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N 88°21'10"W, a distance of 20 feet; Thence S 00° 31' 45"W, a distance of 20 feet, to the beginning of a curve to the right (concave to the southeast), having a radius of 20 feet; Thence northeasterly along said curve, an arc distance of 31.81 feet, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. � � � CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: For Agenda of May 9, 2005 Dept/DivBoard.. EDNSP/Strategic Planning Staff Contact...... Don Erickson(X-6581) Agenda Status Consent.............. X Subject: Public Hearing.. X Lindberg Annexation-Public Meeting to consider 10% Correspondence.. Notice of Intent Petition Ordinance............. Resolution............ Old Business........ Exhibits: New Business....... Issue Paper Study Sessions...... 60%Petition to Annex Information......... Certificate of Sufficiency Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Pro'ect Bud et N/A Cit Share Total Pro'ect.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: On February 29, 2005 the City received the 60% Petition to Annex for the 10.11-acre Lindberg Annexation site east of 138th Avenue SE (Duvall Avenue NE) and north of SE 132°d Street(NE 2°a Street) in unincorporated King County. The King County Department of Assessments certified that the petition has signatures representing at least 60% of the area's assessed value. Under state law, the City is required to hold two public hearings before it can rezone this area. Whereas, zoning was discussed at the public meeting with the applicants on December 20, 2004, this was not a public hearing. The Administration is recommending that the Council accept the 60%Petition to Annex, _ . _ authorize staff to send the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board, and support future R-8 zoning, consistent with the RS Comp Plan land use designation, if it decides to annex the subj ect site. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council set May 23, 2005, to consider the 60%Petition to Annex for the Lindberg Annexation and hold the first of two required public hearings to consider future zoning of the non-street portions of the site. Rentonnet/agnbilU bh R r CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: April 27, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President City Councilmembers VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Alex Pietsch,Administrator Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson(6581) SUBJECT: Proposed Lindberg Annexation -60% Petition to Annex and future zoning ISSUE: • The City is in receipt of the 60%Petition to Annex for the 10.11-acre Lindberg Annexation site. Council must decide whether it wishes to accept the 60%Petition to Annex, and if it does, • The Council must also determine appropriate zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan,. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that Council accept the 60%Petition to Annex and hold the first of two required public hearings on future zoning. If Council concurs with this recommendation, the Administration then recommends that it: • Support future R-8 zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Residential Single Family(RS) land use designation; • Authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent package for the annexation to the Boundary Review B�oard; and, • Authorize the Administration to begin preparing annexation and rezone ordinances for this annexation. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Lindberg Annexarion-60%Petition and zoning Apri127,2005 Page 2 peninsula surrounded by the City on three of its four sides. Three parcels to the east, another annexation,the Mosier II Annexation, is also under consideration. 1. Location: The proposed 10.11-acre irregular-shaped site is located between 138th Avenue SE (Duvall Avenue NE)on the west, SE 132"a Street on the south, the City boundary on the north, and a line approximately 200 feet east of the centerline of 140�' Avenue SE, on the east. The easternmost parcel is immediately across the street from the Puget Colony Homes subdivision. 2. Assessed value: The assessed value at current development is $2,364,000. 3. Natural features: The site is relatively flat west of 140th Avenue SE with a high point of 124 feet and a low point of 119 feet on the easternmost parcel (Figure 4, Topography). The northern most parcel, east of 140th Avenue SE, contains a King County flood control pond and is traversed by a seasonal stream that flows south through Puget Colony Homes and eventually hooks up with Maplewood Creek. The City's Sensitive Areas Maps indicate wetlands on the northern two or three parcels of this annexation. 4. Existing land uses: Existing development includes nine single-family dwellings on nine of the eleven parcels in the proposed annexation. Two of the parcels remain vacant. (Figure 3, Existing Structures) 5. Existin zoning; King County zoning is R-4,which allows up to a base density of four units per gross acre and up to six units per gross acre with incentives and transfer of density credits. 6. Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject parcel Residential Single Family(RS). Potential zoning under the RS designation includes R- 8, eight units per net acre, and RMH, Residential Manufactured Homes. 7. Public services: All responding departments and divisions noted that the annexation represents a logical extension of their respective services and systems. Water Utilitv. The subject area is within both Renton's water service area and King County Water District#90. Sewers. The area is within Renton's wastewater service area but is not currently served by sewer. Sewers would most likely be extended by a developer extension. Surface Water. The Surface Water Utility reports that this annexation is located in the Maplewood Creek Sub-Basin of the Cedar River Basin. They note that there are existing drainage problems within this sub-basin consisting of flooding, erosion due to increased stream flows,water quality, and degraded fish habitat. They are therefore recommending that the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual, level2-flow control, and basic water quality standards,be applied to any new development. Lindberg Annexation-60%Petition and zoning , Apri127,2005 Page 3 Parks. The City currently lacks developed parks in this area. A one-time parks development fee for this project,above what the City receives for parks mitigation from new housing units,is estimated to be $35,383. Fire. The area is currently served by Fire District#25,which the City currently serves under contract. Upon annexation this service would transfer to the City. Public Works Maintenance. Maintenance staff noted that the only organized drainage within the proposed annexation is along 140�'Avenue SE. The City would have to maintain this as well as the existing King County flood control pond. ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION: 1. Consistenc,y with the Comprehensive Plan: The annexation policies generally support the proposed annexation. The subject site is within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and subject to development pressure. (Policies LU-37 and LU-38) The area is available for urbanization under the King County Comprehensive Plan, zoning and subdivision regulations. Renton is the logical provider of urban infrastructure and services to the area. Policy LU-37 states that, in general,the greater the contiguity with the city limits,the more favorable the annexation. The area proposed for annexation is adjacent to the city limits along approximately 80%of its perimeter. Proposed boundaries also are generally identifiable in the field. (Policy LU-43). 2. Consistency with the Boundary Review Board Objectives: (from RCW 36.93.180) a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities; The proposed annexation would cause no disruption to the larger community. b. Use of physical boundaries, inc�uding but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours,- Boundaries generally follow existing City of Renton boundaries to the north,west, and south. Two of these boundaries are also existing streets. c. Creation and preservation of logical service areas; Not applicable. d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries; The boundaries are somewhat irregular but fill in an existing peninsula of unincorporated King County surrounded by the City on three sides. The annexation will create a more regular boundary for the City. e. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas; Lindberg Annexation-60%Petition and zoning April 27,2005 Page 4 Not applicable. f. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts; Not applicable. g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries; The annexation of this peninsula of unincorporated King County will result in a more practical, although interim, city boundary. h. Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; and, King County has designated this area for urban development. i. Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. No portions of the proposed Annexation area are rural or designated for long-term productive agricultural use in the King County Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION: The proposed Lindberg Annexation is generally consistent with City policies and Boundary Review Board objectives for annexation. No impediments to the provision of City services to the area have been identified. The fiscal analysis prepared by staff indicates a surplus of $8,139 at full development. � Attachments N E 6th S w �� z � °' w � Q z � � > � Q � E 4t St � � � th W � � � � � � � � :�;,��:: E � t .— �-- ,::;-. n d �t- w a� � z Q Q � > > � � -�-� � o � U, � � � a �-- o � J �� SE 136th St w cn a� � � S 1 9t Lindberg Annexation o 600 1200 Figure 1: Vicinity Map ♦OEconomic Development,Neighborhoods&S[rategic Planning 1 • 7�oo � A�ez Pietsch,Administrntor � - R@I�tOn CI�I LIRIItS G.Del Rosario �ONT o 1 7 N o v e m b e r 2 0 0 4 O A n n e x a t i o n B o u n d a ry j � � r� . � ` � :`" � - �^^�a ..�-- . '� ^�r . �� ''� - . �� ' �,' Y. �� s ..�if �� ?+ '�k �`Tc�`� �€: x,. � �, .:��'� � e+�"'�.y � , �,� .,�` t _x�.tr..e .�, � '��s� is �,Y�-. , �{ � .�-7�+� �'�-`�� .'�'�,.� � � . +�r � � ``"� ��f �: �Y �� `,�i ��^'va � �'�� ° � k��_ , �<��,�"m �*��.�� ' ?4 �.�fz�� . �+`�ii 3� zr L'��3 ��3� �.. � - '��„�� *Sx �_ �4� � �t�. � �� . � � ��.,#"�„w��r 3 �e,. #� �� r 3,� '� �µ' :�.� �a;�t�.�� ..; �' �4 �� ,� �' _ '��il��....: � _ � a n-� �T :; _ � ��.r: �, � � �'" * :' 4 � . {�� . . � . ��?4'; . � _�. �ss � � �- �.� 'a .; . �,wl` -�,�'� x .i �� $yr �, f��. �. Y" � ' F E t y � rt �, � .t, ` = .. �,� �: , � �.�_.,�,�N <; �� ,h:.� �„� � .. ; LL " „ :.- , � � • � - . . ��;�:. e k :, � �� .. �,�;. . � . , � . : r � . " s��'�} .... �s:� , ...,. �'�" � �y� - . , �? � £ , f� � �� { � � � � � K'1 ��..� � '� v:s� `� I �,�,�Et��.. il �� . . � .. . .. �. 'i�` � ;{ ��' �, F� , �'�F� . . - �. ' ' . . r . ..�� . �: � '. , - " -s . ,:_ ..... , ,:�� k� � �� „�� x ..# �`� �� . _ �_ � �tt_ �. . ��'. _ . _. , �„, '::i. . ... . .. . . . . . � . . .. . . . . _ - _ � . - �, .. �_ .. . - .- _ _ �-- .. . . � x � �. � � N �� . � .. -� . . IM . ' I f��... �.. � � � , ` . i . t`„i` R�x'..i . . � , . . _ � � . � .- �� ;� � � . � �. ':� ;;., . '� . �� ' � ,� . � ' `��. . . . �� . �`� � _ . �� _ . .. . �. , � , :. � � .. �..� i ; ,� i . .,- ." .. � ' � � . ,- . . � � � .� 1 '� � . y ..� � ,. � . . � t^" . , i a "'� . . , � ' .. V � ` � a �'` .dlF° � � a'"". '�'."�'�� ,e' � � , ' �� 3 �:. � . . • F` � i. u+t � � � ' 3� � . 1 - .� + : � 1 �+4�` .. n ��rF =:..:.0."j�' � �" . f i `. 7 � �� '��µ�� y . w�. f�, �f, N� .. ;�� ' u �; . . , . ` ti . � 's.`^� �. .� "� 4 - � .� . '� � t _ . .. � "� 'i..,�.#�. .i :�-.! �!.��. . , '�.. '2 ... .. -{.m.ARI:. . . � �. , . l�. :�. P y� . . . i ., - . v i � '- ' , . . . � �.,,.�'. .,' : �,� � ' , . � � y� � v ' a�01 � ' � ` -'�'n- 1� . � . � . � �"� P 5 � `i + . � �� • . .'S ..... ...e�tsPtl�i°�.t,^'i^^� .. $I�bil��. � IG^F�*��Y'yy��"'•n.+�.�F z . ... _ < ,..r . �^ -�1 '. �S ' '�' — �` , .�,.r. � . � . . � .. � ,�. . ��' t � � �..�'- � �. . � , � . rt. � � Y � a �a —`! . � � �' � ,.. . i . ..' k ' � � - �� t k _ . . �-�a ' i : -�_. _._ �I a , � �� ` - � �: ' , �_ � � ` ' �. I• � ��,X a.µ y� \. . . E. . � '.�„ � �`�i �4�. C L' k _ � � ' i �� 3 R � { `N-k # � !�� M�� A� - � �"w�� M �,�* �� TII! � ��,�. ,n �� r,�� ,� �' �; ,� �. _ � — �{j �� a � -_�� ,� t� � ��+,�c-;�t�' t �'� , _ � x � R�.. � �v , _._�____._ ��- ' � . . � �wr„_ ,� �'. T �`�.'4" �"3 ,: '. a � �'� .. *,�} � '^ ? i . ,y..�.. }, eQ�, s?,�,, �x, �,�,,, �' 7 � � jr A 'c� �,.:, ' �`� ' "'��'�+a.�..� � `�,�.�� '�� m� '+� �'��e � � ^ � bi ,�, .: "�' r` ,-.^ � ��; � . T� �� 1�.'"w�;w �4 � �'r'�`� � � �, 1��• �fi�� ,,.�.�r��c 4 , = � i� �'i '�` 3 �, y"� ^ '' �� s��'`'` � f-> ' �`1'� � ��`�+r 'r ' a �� ' � ...c�� +",..�«� �' � � �� ,r� �/► � `�� r��`"� � ` ` ,y . "'� �`�� ... � - } "��. ' '„ ��t� f� .. � fi.�,�#Y...f �y � � �� ; � , � 5� �,��,� �. f � E; � 't �� 1 ��.:� � ' ,,� , , � �'.. t��s,�� : � .,. � ��. � _ . :r� -s"�7" -i fi.-;,'�' x g:.;��-��+ .. �•�.sa:.ax��.. ��,`a.'�,�.�. �.asa�.:;. �.___�.,,,.,ras�'f£ti��"� �� :..._..ci..�."'�'��1� :�' � 's"' ,..:.�-:,� � . • • • � • ' " � /, � � � �:;'• - - r • �� " .�1 � � 1/ � . • i� �. • , •• � X X • 126.68 �-^'- 12}.56 � X� � 120 3a 120.32 x X I 124.53 / � � X 121 53 �12+79 X 1 Z'S X � � � ,2�s2x , ,2255 � � x 123.40 x 12.67 , _� 122 13 %�2�39 -�_ � � � 1 121 31 X � � / x 124.95 J � I -1 �� x 122 01 ,zz � � � � � / � X 2� 8 x x 123. � � � ` \, � ( � I X120.38 122.94 _-� 120.9 X � , � X I 1 � � \ � 11 � I X,�2.55 \ \ l \ /2J 77 7'Y1.$8 x x x x � \ � /^' \ 124.3 121.69 �/ -1Yy72 � X 19.57 \ „ � 1%7.62 X 1 , ' � � / 1 \ \` ,� ._ :.. . ,._ X,�o.� � ( � x . 1 � x 1 }.3! .25 � 4'�.17 _ " , _- �� , X 19.49 ` \y 1 124 x , , � ' � _' ` \\ �t� X �_ ��/QBs/ ' �\ tP `�' Xl 33 _.' f24.0i _ T�' '_�;'.X �- � \\ o \ � � � ,� I � �� X � 1 \\\\� l h' � � \ 144.5} / I .' � t _ , . � _ � X X X y � � 1 � � w'- C��r'�. � - ' _, .. ' �-127.$' � .' I x I 119.65 s X t2t.as 1� x I "+� � ` . , -' �� \ \ I �� . t22a5 � �� / izs.n ^x�zs.u, x �z�n � x Xi �s= X iie.ao x �"'-� 14137 123.20 - . ._, , _ =,..�e� x � 121.95 �`��"� i1B.24 { X J ' x,23.25 ,2.�� /� K xt31.63 124.L3 X 120.70 719.0 x 11B.7I X X x /// 12�.{5 18.B1 �\ � x 12213 //�' 1 \ \ 7Y2.3 X i20.60 V \ I X 119. 19.SJ I 21.�7 X 12426 121 t .68 x ne.ae x x 111.63 72 7 x 118.30 X Xi2316 x123.28 /23.3a x iza. Xiz�.n i2o.sa x i .5i xt ase x x n x iie. �e.ia x ,so ac xt2269 i os izi.n ne2s xiieoe x X 122.60 �X-�1�]� x �! x 718.08 11 tP0.58 X 122 72 121 55 121 57 k i'.e 20 x Lindberg Annexation o Zoo 400 Figure 3: Topography map 1 Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning - 1 m(flt@NdI COf1t0Uf 1 . 2[�0� ♦O� A�ez Pietsch,Administraror - - ReI1tOn CI�LIITIItS G.Del Rosario Nzo 17Nuvember2004 � A n n e x a t i o n B o u n d a ry � ° g � � 0 W C� � . =� ;� �� 0 � - . .._ _ _..� µ , :_ _ . . q�� o(� �� a� �.J - nµ';3 . , ' - _ . ,-, . . _ _ . 4{�� .� � �- o 0 � �, z � ` �.. 0 r L � ��/�\\ i� `� « � ' / _ �� . � � _. .��;!� -_ , - , � � F "_ 4� � _ 'J+ri'_x _ , . _ - . - , - .��"c � � � � � � r , � � � ` / � ❑ v � � W � � � � � o � a � � �, a o � ❑ � � ❑ � Lindberg Annexation o Zoo 400 Figure 4: Structure map �� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � Structure 1 . 24�� A1ex Pietsch,Administraror � Annexation Boundary G.Del Rosario NT »No�embe�2c,c�a — — Renton City Limits W C� Q� :. . � . .��_. ��r� -ti-,�y��... .�, �, .Y.`�� —�--J � � ,' ,., . � �— . � , W Q� Q Lindberg Annexation o Zoo 400 Figure 5: Sensitive Areas map Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning Wetland Boundary l . 2400 ♦.� Atez Pietsch,Administrator - - ReC�tOn CI�LI�YIItS G.Del Rosario �Nz 1�November 2003 � A n n e x a t i o n B o u n d a ry LINDBERG ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET Units Po ulation AV Existin dev. 9 23 $2,364,000 Full dev. 63 158 $22,050,000 Assumptions: 2.5 persons/household $263,000 AV/existing unit ................ $350,000 AV/new SF homes ................... Ri�u�ti�i�.s.:�::::::::::: Total revenues Existin Full Rate Existing::�':��`:;:':�'I:�t;$7�;�5: Re ular le $7,423 $69,237 3.14 Full:::::::::�:::��;6�'1::6�: Excess le $210 $1,955 0.08865 � � State shared revenues Rate er ca Existin Full Li uor tax $3.52 $80.96 $556.16 Li uor Board rofits $5.04 $115.92 $796.32 Fuel tax-roads $14.46 $332.58 $2,284.68 Fuel tax-arterials $6.47 $148.81 $1,022.26 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cam er excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Criminal 'ustice $0.36 $8.28 $56.88 Total $686.55 $4,716.30 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existin Full " Real estate excise" $40.86 $939.78 $6,455.88 Utili tax"` $133.20 $1,198.80 $8,391.60 Fines&forfeits" $18.33 $421.59 $2,896.14 Total $2,560.17 $17,743.62 " Per capita '`'' Per housing unit-based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6%tax rate .................. ................... i�Q�t�':':::::::::::::::::::: Total ongoing costs Per ca ita Existin Full Existing::�': :::::$'1:`1;;�D�`:26: Contracted Services Full:::::::::::::$8�;5'i'�:7�: Alcohol $0.23 $5.22 $35.87 Public Defender $3.13 $72.08 $495.17 Jail $7.19 $165.42 $1,136.34 Subtotal $242.72 $1,667.37 Court/le al/admin. $57.08 $1,312.84 $9,018.64 Parks maintenance* $14.90 $342.70 $2,354.20 Police $270.00 $6,210.00 $42,660.00 Road maintenance*"` N/A $438.00 $2,250 Fire"*' $1.25 $2,955.00 $27,562.50 Total $11,501.26 $85,512.71 *See Sheet Parks FIA "*See Sheet Roads FIA **"Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact Existing::::::::::::::`:::�6��:�� Full::::::::::�:::�$;�3$:��4 C3��;�t[i3�i�:Casts::Parks acquisition &developm�nt(from Sheet Parks FIA): Other one-time costs: $35,383.00 Total one-time costs:::::::�::::$�5;�83:�Q: Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo � �C6f1� Ct9ulity Department of Assessments Scott Noble King County Administration Bidg. Assessor 500 Fourth Avenue,Room 708 Seattle,WA 981042384 (206)296-5195 FAX(20�296-0595 Email:assessor.info��netrokc.=ov w►��vr.metrokc.gov/assessor/ ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted March 1, 2005 to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton of the properties described as the Lindberg Annexation, has been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed - value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of Revised Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002. The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time frame, and thi� document does not certify such to be the case. 9 Dated this 7� day of March, 2005 �� Scott Noble, King C unty Assessor ��1202M ' �E� : - , , z.. _ . . oney Creek East ; ��CASTLE � 27.5 ac. - � � ,��,:> � =�. . - � Merritt II _�:, .,�_� - � �. � 133.3 ac. `__- _ �,r;��`�`h` `1 � ' ' - - - -- 'h'^C...,._..a: . ` � . � ' -- ____ h+. _+,,.-- � __ _ }....-...w , t f'>.Hl � - . _ ___ _-____ -' �_ .. .�"c�'. \I '' i _ '' _'t n,^,^,, -- --- ---------- ---- "'_ 'i`• __ " �E!` - . . '' �,�.� << �.� -�, ,. . . - Wedgewood � . .w , � Querin � - `�.� _ __ _ _ ! .J`��.�'o'M� h _�' _ ' :{ ; � � � .�� Lane 9.4 ac. _ � Y -� - :F� �� . - � �� ..; -�#`� . . 38.9 ac. J �.# }.-:�n . = r -i��' _ _ '- ' • , `t: �_iF �.� �' _. .,, i� � '$ :�� _ _ � ��,; `r #,_ - �,��€�� - . � oquiam :�, _ �. � a��l'A_ - `��;;.�R � .�- � �,�� , st_ �� . 20.4 ac. �}, � ,� . �.� �,`,. �� .�� - - � �., ; M�k s - �_�� ' � - ,3; - . T` :._ � ._ _ �-�` = Park Terrace �� 4� � p -� Maplewood �� :�:f�.` ; - '�- ='. ,.. � � ,- 7 . -__ �: Y��$ �� : East .6 ac. YN{h: �:� 4 $ I 2 -E � #E�+�, ' l,� �A"1 � . .: . ' � � �'�� t t_ ,� 4,, - � -� � At�$: � 26.1 ac. -rx�4f-, 6� ¢�k -` ' � „ _ _ _2 � , �Y €F. { y_��(!_� / '1_ ' � , 1S,�i,� � � ' ' '_ �= R � -��{ �� Lindber � _ �,�� F �� 1 _ �� . � g -�- -, � _ �� _�� z� ; � ;, 10.6 ac. -- ;;�� , � � m,} i a��=�-+TJ k k, ' "'`F�- = 1 � _I _ _ �"�� . _ x-q Yt _. : �t -�r;f..��-� � i, . -_- �J ""- ' �-s __ - .—� _, � ' � ,i 6-y.�.� s� �\ � � - � a # ; ., � ��t{'# , _ �� l =- �f ' a�- t l. � -- � ` ` � � ., + ' � +Y - s � � �". �, � ,'.§ �� f; �� r.r ri.a fa, � Mosier II - ��6- a� ,...�� 4 4 �--t� -�� . k�; � ->��;,�� ;, � '� �- 1, �r- _ � m. 31 .0 ac. � . , �i , , : � � � � ,�- , �-.. � � �� . k� j. � ` � _ � �= � y ' ' ��L��.. � ,� . .. , . � _ _ ��. . i � t � Maplewood �� x : �_s s E a'�y �t..i � -- ; .'j�.�y` Y . � .�,,�:,,x_ :�.-.: .� • • Ma lewood :�..--��.r =�-_�Z �� Addition p ��. �r� ;� �i"i[boa:a: "r I - � - _ -' ,.C.' -_.3;": ; . ` � r � r ` _� 60.5 ac. lementary �� k 4 .. . I� - - , _ , E f- � �' \ 1.,�.} �� - _ 9.8 ac. g �� ;:-- --, - - . � .��.` ' �`�-''j - i .; , _ _ .,_��' ,�i i;' � — _ – , ., - � �� _�_ _ •—•—•----J :i_.��i i�� Akers Farms .. _ ,� " . � 11 .3 ac. � � , � ,, _��;:: ;;<<;T a' ��y ,._. ==_ �:�� - ¢ �� ; ..� ,� �- .. - .�. �::_._._.-�-=-�=:_._._ =_ - . ; - - , , . -. . . - � _ j 1 .� ' �,�.. ; " .r ; __ ; ` – t� _ ' . � � Fa�k �� , ` City of Renton � - : �:��. 6.8 ac. - � � � E : Current Annexations � . . . , , : � . _ ; I ',ro, " '.. . ... .... • . . � ' � URBANGROwIHBWNDARY �_��.__7. . Anthone' � ; ,�:_:a �m� � � 4.9 ac• ' � ACTNEANNFXA770N �- - -' �� 'f - i - - "' Ecorartuc Devebpment,NegliDorhooAs 8 Sfrategrc Plamrg . . . ��• • AM�PMxR M�ne12M , I- , - _ - �fJ ' - ' ♦ Gr.w�mz�oosm - 'Approved by the B.R.B . �,`SY O U � � ♦ � ♦ rr■ ` ��N�o� LINDBERG ANNEXATION PUBLIC HEARING COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF 60% PETITION TO ANNEX& FUTURE ZONING May 23, 2005 The City is in receipt of ther 60%Petition to Annex from property owners in the proposed Lindberg Annexation area. The King County Department of Assessments has certified that the petition represents 60%or more of the area's assessed value. The subject site is within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and is designated Residential Single Family (RS) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. It bordered by SE 132nd Street on its southern boundary and 138`h Avenue SE on its western boundary. The annexation site abuts City on its southern, western and northern boundaries (see back of handout). If ihe Council decides to accept the 60%Petition to Annex at tonight's meeting it is being asked to hold the first of two required public hearings on future zoning for the annexation site. This assumes the Boundary Review Board approves it and Council afterwards decides to bring the area into the city. The site currently has King County's R-4 zoning and there are nine single-family detached dwellings on it. Proposed future zoning would likely be Renton's R-8 (8 units per net acre). Renton's zoning deletes critical areas and streets from a site's gross acreage whereas the County's zoning does not. Also, the County's zoning allows both attached and detached units. With the City's R-8 zoning, the 10.11-acre site could accommodate approximately 63 single- family detached dwelling units at full development,versus 58 units under the County's R-4 zoning. Reviewing departments of the City have raised no major objections to this annexation. The Administration recommends that Council: • Accept the 60%Petition to Annex for the Lindberg Annexation; • Hold the first of two required public hearings on future zoning; • Support future zoning on the site consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan land use designation; • Authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board for King County; and, � Authorize the Administration to begin preparing annexation and zoning ordiances for future Council consideration, assuming the BRB approves the annexation and the Council decides to bring the subject area into the City. Public Mtg Handout OS-23-0S.doc\ � _ =��,�' , ��'� ,�-----�� S'.�►�� i�- - - � �� N; ��1. � �i�� #wi.��i �; �IIIC�1 �f � li��l•�i� r�E.� � ��:`� � n�i � ��'`� � � � �.�..e r■�r - � � 11l111 w � �'`�1I�r,�� r � �u��:�� ay,�,� � � � � - ��- ' �w■ ��1�1I1�� :��`i,��#�I �,� � �- . � � ��1#11�i� � ;�i �!"��1 ��,� = .�i�� : ii�� ll�rll�� ; �� :� 1��i� � �� .�"' ��,� : +� 01�•' .� �.M. s �� fr`�i !�� !�i�� i�i �� _ � �°' ��:1!!:: ,:�1�:��'ll� ■ '� ' '■i� � � � - �� "�� r �� i � �� f �� ■ � ��,�'� � � � ��i ��I � � � � � 'I �111�� ! � .�,� a � � - � � � � �, l� �� ,,�_t� �. ��; � �E� �� i � ��'�� ■�� ; ��`��;�� ,�� f � ■ �� .�,�.��"�` �� `��"�� ■ � ■��I�� •A .i:.�s�v�,,��3� ��(�� !� i ( 1 � �� ,1��..-�� ►�� «� ��.� � � f�i.:�� •��r ��, a� ��',, a 11i�1�1�N !� ��: �i ��.�'�� ■� �,��'l��:r� � ��' � �� I�� r � � � � �� ■ r �e� s�� f'�.!'�� 1�� '� � � �� 3 �s��r��f�r ._ �►,,,� :, ��-' r :a��s��rw� ��►��` �`� �, �� t�11 ■ �■ • '�► � ��i�t - ��:� � �Y �� +�► � t�� ., � �� r�'�n��i�� : ��,� ��'�'� G��f' ��r ��,t��r �■�1�� .�.. � 1■��IG� i i ia ��''�� '��1��'� � � �� jr�� i� ��'�:��""��.��`� � �,�r� � �� •�.��1'��` �"I�,��'�'�,��,��l�` � � �� _ ��II'� l��I��,�,��.�� ■ " �� ►�► ,��►� ��.� ;�� s � � �'''��: i� ��`�r��,��,��:��;�.��,��,�'� � � � .��..�,■. . �.a�;� �� '� � �'`� � :a ;�� '�: 1�., �■,�� '�`t�� .� � �1�� 1��e�� '� 1 � �� - ��; �.r. -- --- �_W--- • a - ! ' - . • 1 .1t !1 , � - � �.�. �� µ � ! , ' �.iy� 1 1� � � �� n �.-- . , f � ��.0 Ui � � - -- { , --- �-�_.__.__.__�__ _____.__�____.. Annexation Review Form . ,: NOV - 4 2004 [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexat�on Pl�tition , __._ TO : Building Surface V�l.at�r Utility Water Utili ��rn � �.�,.;'.. � F�ar Wastewater Utility Po�ice Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Lindberg Annexation, A-04-008 Location : The proposed 10.11-acre irregularly shaped Lindberg Annexation is located south of NE 4th Street abutting the current City boundary on its north and portions of its western and southern boundaries. Basically, it is north and east of the recently incorporated Carlo Annexation, earlier this year. IYs western boundary would be Duvall Avenue NE and most of its southern boundary would be SE 133`a Street, if extended (see attached map and petition). Date Circulated: November 4, 2004 Comments Due: November 18. 2004 General Information Area : 9.72 acres Street length : 410 feet (existing) Assessed Value : $2,448,000 Estimated Population : 25 people Current Uses: Residential : 10 Dwelling Units Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation : Residential Future Uses: : +62 Dwelling Units Future Po ulation • 155 eo le Reviewing Department/Division: /' t�i? y `'Z 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �Q 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? � L (Over) Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2 11I04/2004 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? � 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? � 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? ,�R� i�� 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) � � General recommen ation and comments: V � Signatu, : Date: � . �� Annexation Review Form ,, �U r�� c �-�r ��p [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ j 60% Annexation Pe�f�Tj.S�iVTo � Fq�,��S TO : Building Surface Water Utility ��' Water Utility �°�� ,,,,, Wastewater Utility Potice Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Lindberg Annexation, A-04-008 Location : The proposed 10.11-acre irregularly shaped Lindberg Annexation is located south of NE 4t'' Street abutting the current City boundary on its north and portions of its western and southern boundaries. Basically, it is north and east of the recently incorporated Carlo Annexation, earlier this year. It's western boundary would be Duvall Avenue NE and most of its southern boundary would be SE 133rd Street, if extended (see attached map and petition). Date Circulated: November 4, 2004 Comments Due: November 18, 2004 General Information Area : 9.72 acres Street length : 410 feet (existing) Assessed Value : $2,448,000 Estimated Population : 25 people Current Uses: Residential : 10 Dwelling Units Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation : Residential Future Uses: : +62 Dwelling Units Future Po ulation • 155 eo le Reviewing DepartmenUDivision: 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �' l, � 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? z,,�,� <<--u—� - a �> ��- (}�-� �� o�er> Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2 11/04/2004 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? ✓?�% 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? ' � y�/��,��,�'.�.��-�,,��'`_..�G� _ � � T � , ,/ � 7 � � 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? .�-��,� � �G�e�� G�� L� � J 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) General recommendation and comments: Signature: Date: ��G'% . � C ��"dk^ . �bri , ,4�.� � � ..., �, Annexation Review Form � �� 2 �a�4 � � �ccr,o��o�::��r,��a�n,r k' � ^J_.',.�'-t'".._�;..;,r�.-.-. [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation��c�ri`LL. � ,...._� TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Transportation Pu Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 Location : The proposed 10.11-acre irregularly shaped Lindberg Annexation is located south of NE 4�' Street abutting the current City boundary on its north and portions of its western and southern boundaries. Basically, it is north and east of the recently incorporated Carlo Annexation, earlier this year. It's western boundary would be Duvall Avenue NE and most of its southern boundary would be SE 133'� Street, if extended (see attached map and petition). Date Circulated: November 4. 2004 Comments Due: November 18. 2004 General Information Area : 9.72 acres Street length : 410 feet (existing) Assessed Value : $2,448,000 Estimated Population : 25 people Current Uses: Residential : 10 Dwelling Units Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation : Residential Future Uses: : +62 Dwelling Units Future Po ulation • 155 eo le Reviewing Department/Division: 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or signi�cant problems for your departmenUdivision� / ��l 4 ��a-, a � l3 v �v ��'f �� e��7�i � // /� � ��p�Tra�� Gl/ /`�— f'�r��Z �. 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? (Over) . . Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2 11/04/2004 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? ��` l 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? lJ�C� l! �c e� /�o��i a�.� / a/� e C� �- �- � � / � �'�v r� �ili•e '�- � 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) General recommendation and comments: �f � v L �i Gc/a�^ � '`� -le'/Y�e ��7 O Z h F-/( /� c�'" � y l/v �' ! v�c�i ��U� �✓ � s.�e..,� ST ��r I'r-��--e� �� Signature: Date: �� "� � �-o�-oo� C:�"?� ��. ;-,,_-.,-;��1 ;-,f; a� �, �F ,,.. ,.� - �.. :� :.� _.a:�.:� NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS ��-;, �_��=.- :-_. -;=,� - UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) 10% PETITION— �--- 1�►��-+�� ANNEXATION TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF SUBMITTED BY: �+ M L`�"'� ►�`� `� � THE CITY OF RENTON �DUEss: '�. � . !3�x Z � t�� City Hall, c/o City Clerk jZ e„�, fn/4 9�p5to 1055 South Grady Way PHONE: Z�,-��t o -3�� Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) of the assessed value of property within the proposed annexation area which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A legal description (Exhibit A) and map (Exhibit B) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the �ling of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. 1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and �led for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the �rst of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should'be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) ,o�,� �Q� 1��3C� s� 1..�1� �� '��,� 1. +�� L,i � /c��v �!�- �f�C� 2. 10�2 ��- /3��'s� ��,3� -- �TT+�� e� �,� � . �.� ,��,�, �- ��.�' 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Page 2 of 2 H:�DIVISION.S\P&TS\PLANNINGWNNEX110%Notice of Intent(rev's).doc\DE 04/19/04 i � LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION SITE Tax ID Legal Description 152305-9207 STR 152305 TAXLOT 207 W 149.29 FT OF E 479.29 FT OF N 99FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 152305-9044 STR 152305 TAXLOT 44PP ACT 39923958 MOBILE HOME LOT 3 KCSP 676075 REC AF#7701190691 SD PLAT 152305-9206 STR152305 TAXLOT 206 PP ACT 39924055 MOBILE HOME LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 152305-9205 STR 152305 TAXLOT 205 LOT 2 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 8303160822 SD SHORT PLAT DAF 152305-9222 STR 152305 TAXLOT 222 PP ACT 39924071 MOBILE HOME LOT 3 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 152305-9223 STR 152305 TAXLOT 223 LOT 223 LOT 4 LESS RD OF KC SHORT PLAT#882065 RECORDING NO 830316-0822 SD SHORT 152305-9037 STR 152305 TAXLOT 37 S 99 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SD SEC LESS E 330 FT& LESS 152305-9082 STR 152305 TAXLOT 82 E 330 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS C/M RGTS 152305-9177 STR 152305 TAXLOT 177 N 99 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS E 479.29 FT LESS W 20 FT 152305-9048 LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 881050 RECORDING NO 8201220536 SD PLAT DAF-POR OF S 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF NE1/4LYNOFSE132NDSTLESSE30FT LESS W 30 FT ' ' i 1 � ' ' " t� ; �► � ; E . ,, . � M � � � � � .... ,��.. � �Y� , � . : . i -.—L_ � � � } ti � . q � ;�I � �l � , � ` �} y � � _-°�s'- n � � '}`� � 'u'xr 4 F (.....�. i � 'j ` � s � �� J � � � . �,. � : � t � r . � --�',. � � r.__° . � �i� . y�� , , � .I �,� .�.� . .� . � r,....:,... � +tIYN Y. y t � • M. �11KYN �I IW � 1 -- n s�w wLrrt ~ �ji 1 .. �wrs. -��«�. 4 4 �4�1 � Nu"Yro) .�_._.. w • � •-�GVLs-R„�j �� '�� +,'� � i �0 ��0 ''�� i �.*, o�'�,' �� ..r . >> . . t � : '.'�+r:��'`. � ' � .- $ r +� ( , �`� --- � . �! 9� ' � '-x' v' j -y 'o,�; § �. �� 3 ��,�� . �''�� L_._.J �, - . . e i �a -� �� p + �,` � � -�_._ � . � � x � N � ape . � "i� --*+.-�, 9��t �� '"aa { '�� "t ' � . � R �i .�' � + _ § . Qt !s � � .�. f-- � ox i�� x . Iw �1�ti)1 �J.L M V/ '�s .�wr.+ """ .rirr r.�+w w►W .� �� __w.w � _' Mw..I 7AM 412N �r.�rwrY � � MMl3f'31WVNZM _�� (/1 � vii_' —�F_� •4aF_�� r� a. i Q ! ''•� �� '�r.e � '��9`�' � ` " _�i 5 i ; t� i � .I � ..,„ ' `�`:' � " � ' '+ v� �� 8 t ! �1 � -,�--- O i '+e{j � • � ti! � � �� i � ;•� ', ` q.�� : !• t ! k � � I� � . ' . t� 1 , U ' , � � \• ►• � 40 i ti:. � ...."'�•'_"'...t�, . �� M �.,1e � �i� WO►.r N M 0 t 1 �.: � } :� � v �• � 4 �3� � �' � � • + R � �` - q ----� ' �r " �. �1' � *� + < �� }� � � '�� I j'�� ti` "� �0 � �� _ ; : �; �t� '` , � �1 � ♦ R •� '! e`' �� R =� << . . � —•--2'�---�--•—�--_.. . ... _ „ ......» ---�• ------ -- - _ . , — -- �-~... ----- � ' 3nv w. -------- ----- --- �.� � sw�t .w» .. . � rrAY«+�.w.�� i��J ---• ?'t T '�e ./ ��._. .��_ .. .�ffi. , _— }� �,� }.o � � � . - � ,- � , ; . � . � $ � �� --�- , , --, ! . , � mI ' f � �j a �.�' .�.. ` - �� - � ", —�--�--- '�,� s � ` , = d �I . _� � ;� _ �� .��' � _� �� ' � � �� t� ;�,,� Z ' _ � I � ' �o(;�-- $ � � �' , � � � � , . � � , ^ My`�++MMw. S M •� wr � tN•I!� ry)i ' V� e 1y� M �_�� w� �r ^ /V"WI _ n �� - . .. � • � �� ;�� a� � ��p .�p �p �� i� Y� •�p ,� . � � , ; � j Y � � A � � , ' � ��a � •�O • w ' � �' � �I �I ( �� +� � 8 -.--��--- � � N 4� i � J � ' � . � �` � i t0 . . `I � � � ' �9� i � �'� �` � S �� I --�-� l , . � ; ��.Ta%iR � Y[YM�N' � .��iM'Mf � �� —�—� f, '�1�. ¢� K N�i � � � ��.) o;� � ' , .�� ) � Y <O�. � } � F �-., - � f � �S � ' S• v�' f � � � ' � � ��t• � - - # � , — �� . � , � �r� � S � i � 5 � ` � 1 'lf.7M` ; '+�'^r' ww ' �-•�•�- r`.�r ' • �� ......,..__.�= rs � r.� ��. �9 ' . •� t� . ; ...'�...""' +w.t:> ..� ' • .� !1 • � f' � ap '� i1 " a tl� �, � ` � . A a t +9I �� a i sw�l j � ' ' � f I � '__ y , ,13 � n� ; �� • h lt 1t_ ��w i _ /`!_ a • � � Annexation Review Form [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Lindberg Annexation, A-04-008 Location : The proposed 10.11-acre irregularly shaped Lindberg Annexation is located south of NE 4�' Street abutting the current City boundary on its north and portions of its western and southern boundaries. Basically, it is north and east of the recently incorporated Carlo Annexation, earlier this year. It's western boundary would be Duvall Avenue NE and most of its southern boundary would be SE 133�a Street, if extended (see attached map and petition). Date Circulated: November 4, 2004 Comments Due: November 18. 2004 General Information Area : 9.72 acres Street length : 410 feet (existing) Assessed Value : $2,448,000 Estimated Population : 25 people Current Uses: Residential : 10 Dwelling Units Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation : Residential Future Uses: : +62 Dwelling Units Future Po ulation � 155 eo le Reviewing Department/Division: SURFACE WATER UTILITY 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? The proposed Lindberg Annexation is located in the Maplewood Creek Sub-basin of the Cedar River Basin. Maplewood Creek drains across the Maplewood Golf Course and into the Cedar River. There are existing drainage problems within the Maplewood Creek sub-basin, downstream of the proposed annexation area. These problems consist of flooding, erosion due to increased stream flows caused by urbanization, water quality and degraded fish habitat. To minimize increases to downstream impacts, we recommend requiring use of the 1998 King (Over) Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2 11/22/2004 , County Surface Water Design Manual level 2-flow control and basic water quality treatment for any new development within the proposed annexation area or stricter standard if adopted by the city at the time of development. The Lindberg Annexation drains to the Southeast, where the runoff enters King County at the 18" diameter culvert under SE 132"d Street. The drainage path downstream of SE 132"d Street follows the Puget Colony Homes drainage system, which was upgraded with 36" diameter polyethylene pipe to remedy flooding problems in this neighborhood. The Lindberg Annexation is comprised of several large residential lots, which could be subdivided into short plats in the future. 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? The King County drainage problem and complaint inventory for the proposed annexation area identifies a complaint about soil settling from tax-lot 152305-9177. The proposed annexation area lacks any significant drainage infrastructure, and drainage basically sheet flows across driveways and yards, and some runoff from Duvall Ave flows onto the area in this fashion. The drainage from the proposed annexation area ultimately flows down to the East Fork of Maplewood Creek, and discharges just South of the SE 136th Street right-of-way at 142nd Ave SE, from a 36" diameter polyethylene (CPEP) outfall. The Maplewood Creek ravine has experienced significant erosion, which would be worsened by increased flows and volumes of runoff that will result when the properties within proposed annexation area are subdivided and further developed. There is an existing King County owned and maintained detention pond located adjacent to the proposed annexation that would be an island after the annexation is approved. The discharge storm systems for the King County pond are within the proposed annexation. 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? The proposed Lindberg Annexation is a logical e�ension of services provided by the SurFace Water Utility. 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? At full build-out of the proposed annexation, the City will be draining more runoff to the outfall, which may trigger the need to use Surface Water Capital Improvement Program funds to implement a solution to the slope erosion problem being caused by the outfall. With future subdivision and development within the proposed annexation area, additional public storm systems will be constructed, increasing the Surface Water Utility Maintenance needs. This will incrementally require additional resources for maintenance of infrastructure from this annexation, other annexations, and new development within existing City limits. At some point in time additional resources will be needed for maintenance due to new development and annexations. H:�File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations\IINDBERGIO%.doc Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 � 11/22/2004 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? The Surface Water Utility would assume ownership and maintenance responsibitity for the public storm systems within the 140th Ave SE right-of-way that would be included in the proposed annexation area. This includes a 380 lineal feet, 36" diameter, polyethylene storm water pipeline that conveys the overflows for the King County flood- control pond located just west of the proposed Lindberg Annexation. 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) There is an existing King County owned and maintained detention pond adjacent to the proposed annexation. If the pond is not included in the Lindberg Annexation, the pond would be an island of unincorporated King County surrounded for the most part by the City corporate limits. Due to this we question if a more logical annexation boundary would include the King County flood-control pond within the Lindberg Annexation. As the downstream overflow pipeline, the area directly downstream of the pond and all the area upstream of the pond would be in the City of Renton, it would be logical to include the pond within the Lindberg Annexation. This would require the Surface Water Utility to maintain and operate the facility, which will have a cost impact to the Utility. While we would become responsible for the pond's maintenance costs, we would gain control to protect city property. We doubt that King County would accept the situation where they would own and maintain the pond while the surrounding land would be Renton's jurisdiction. General recommendation and comments: The downstream storm system (outside of the proposed annexation area) discharges to the steep sloped Maplewood Creek ravine. The slope erosion problem will get worse with time and may accelerate as the properties within the proposed annexation develop due to the increase in peak flow and more importantly the increase in volume of runoff that will be discharged through the outfall at SE 136th St and 142"d Ave SE. Due to the downstream sensitivity to erosion we recommend that any future development within this annexation will be subject to the 1998 King County SurFace Water Design Regulations with Level 2 Flow Control, which is designed to provide stream erosion protection, or subject to a stricter standard if adopted by the city at the time of development. � Signatur : � Date: /I'Z Z'�� cc. Lys Hornsby Mike Stenhouse John Thompson H:�File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations\IINDBERGIO%.doc � � , , ; , �� ,� . � p� �M � � � � * ,»�r:.a, � �� , � �,�""` � t �� a�� _ . �� : , �„. � ,e'°� ,� ,•: - --... . ._ . , ;�" ^�, q� ""S .�� , , a , , . ---- ;,� � ,..�..,��-- � n , _ �, � • t > �� I� � � � � •1 y _ 10 LL � � _._�_ �_V..._ _ . v , � a .., � � �,Dc' �., � �' �' � � � ,;� . '�� ar .� 19;E°'�"�'29 19,E2-3019,E2-31 �'��*�' �, y � ''��, y "`� ��` � �' � �z� a '�i .; , �- ,� I °�. d"`'�w'A i' .t.iY G � �+' + � � K��.,�`�. . . . ��` � �.' k; : ,". ,�E .�C �� N'r ��*'�,"�`�'� s f �T}�< . �y,�; i 'S. ,t ,:.w.w++w+,rfc.:,..�:'r...,:.f71t�:�itlo1►,:i �� ' ; �'S�� ,�'�'��y� � �'t�}��, �t .r ,i�'�r��t.. 'I 3 $� .,. S..�� .1 �. � � "�'r�� y` '4' � e �T „� .� . �. . � ^, „ y��• �3+" � � rld'+�*i��.�y .i.� 9� € ,�'C �,{ " �w..'"'_`" .. k_� �� Y ��}Y.1x*t�: ' �t.. � �' ��. i `k. ' � �. ��. "�', 9 ,�g - �F�� 'ev`� t �. , r^ � . � � ..'�',a+r. '�wyP:�' �,,��y � k �. �:y. , ..y� �-ae'�' �°L ;vt �4 . , �` '4 r*554�,`,+ � �3, . ��,..a. ' � �, i ,aa�k .*« 4 +'m d��, t x� >r : �k '. � � �`� 'Y°'""'"�+� f�`" �� . �""" f��;�`:BA�, �x "��'{", � ° v 7 �.r . .. . _,_'�,• �� . ... , � � . � � �•,• . ��. , � . � 1., . . "A ' _ �, . ..:— x...' : �� . .a� �. )Y� S *�- , i ' ��`" ,,•�r '�� A` �_dk y a��`, --_ _ , ,` �. ,. . _ �.__._.,.y,__ . ' .'� r . .. . .b - '. ., � . � ,". ,• - , . �, ..» . , �� . .��.,. .�, .rA !Sr ; ' . . - � �� "K�� «. ' � ;� . � �� . . t _ , a u: ;w. . � ,x, �•�, . � . . , , : � , +t .., -;� � . _ � r . , . � �+ ,as +�,• �f. . .-. 4 . ..im' r , . . . . ��.:: es,m,. . _ t ' � � _�� r ��., �� , s � � �Y : � ` „r � . ., ,. Y ,: ,� ,. 9 s t :a�+ � y� �q�. +� "�xr � „ ...,,_ y: a° =,� '�g�x� " � - � �� %� . �A` 7,� � '+M � k'C �� ' .�� X , � � � `' �y .r � , � � .� ._� ,.�! � �k, ffi � �` . � t . � ` � ,a,,,� � , ,,� ` �-' i � p �..J r �y` � i �k" �' ' �'!%d �,.'�� 94:� Ty '�°' s�� ` °�� ,. � , �c�, �-w. . 'a«� ��, �;�#� �� ,:r.'� ��'�� ,�� '�`��'� `� ;. �� , � . ., , . , > � �,� � � �. .� . � �, r� � �� x �.�� , i � �..�...�:�.;. � �s� ;� „ �' x � �.c ,'.;e�- , M },• '�� . � � a `� � � •-!-! � • ^��`� '�,� �:�"� �1:• 1�. , .,. yT� ��, � � � ,� � � r...�w�•� •� ��a, �, � i � � ��. � ,�, .: ,� � �� :POND''�� , ,:� a.. � +. , ,.�,,. � ,� , � `�:� . .y'��°'q�y .• r.f��•�• .. ,r K,,; :�'. �: . . . +R. ";1� r� *,r+y, } � !', i� ti -..»�_ . � � . } . . • . .....-.ui.. ' ,�. � h � �4" �� >r . . '��r�4 �. �,Yx }� � y.� a:� ;h- v ,". �,r .. .. .� �• �• ' � 1 �'y '�{ ,y.. 1 _ 1` .y,� . . � �,y ; �� ` � M +fl � ��y'_, Y 4. � ` \✓"� 1F -�j� `,� 'v � ��4�� 4� � � a11 L�LL#ti��_.ti 7 �" . �..,,y 4�'# .._ " � � � �� ry 4 ��. '� Q� � � �4� � .�y.�� * , � �� '�f � �.��i'�F � �y , �_ V � � �v y. D" . �,n. � .- ��'�'�'3 �� "$. . ��i Y� � .�,. . �' "'y� ��`��'� Y�+�'. *, �` +,� �F" R� ' 1 � . �7!i'iW�+ e{, �'k, f" �F T . �i� �{�' .w _ _"„""' n� g �.�'°"' ` ��' �.a.'4' *�}ds•' ":.�� _� - s � . .� � f� �:�..WiY �- � .. +,` . . .. A. .�. �u� *..� "«Ty':[ � � , �4YC �' �` ,�y,. 4 1a . '�' �.. ,,.�� $��ip y s..y� y�' °� � � ��y�,,°+�* y"T'v�r.�� ,�� ,w"�. ��h� '+ 1 Ay � r.'� �r_ "�ti ,� � � �,� , � � i� y�_:� �„�. � �,a� 4�s�� i/t�' � .'� w�� ',;. .. .. . � �[..� q� .�;e .. :.. _.. �.,�'s +6 h�ti .«�°ii+s� � • '�`�"e '.� �{' ' .. .+ ��u� �k_ � �..� �r: � � � Y��" i � . � . +� ,i :, , .�. , a .�d: . . --- -^ . , _I �. ', �.` � y :4 � �, '�.. �M�,��".,a ,. ... `.` +.F ., _a '�9r . � , �u�,_ '�irr' 'c i . '••,e, ; .W, ,. , ' ,,'+'9"a � , ' . . �-. x. - �� ` �� ' ' T'� �.�: � � . ,�,r � .. . .... � w �= ' . f'✓� � � ' �� v � � � � ��;��{j�,.., - �raS';, .�� I ... � y�l �I :a �If :x:� � t iYx3"� a %F"s �" ' t`�`� ,,A �i t � . , �. r� .� � r �''� �3, h. .2 T,./�s .'�Cl��rj'�, *'S*F�' . .. .....� .,* � � .��"4� x , � .xlr. �� t� F 6� �..�►, � �� 3 � s ,�-"_( �,�, �., w'w �� :� .��'. �,.>, 7�`!, _e• '"r. •. ,� _ . Ii� � � is r � �� Y',�r'w' �� Ww �� t' 4! !t I # � ."ur ,�� x r �f .a.��. �. a r' . �__•__..._____� ... �' �p , _. . .'s� ,I 9 �,�. �E �' ry� �� I � L. � � .. .�..,, .� _" �d� �L . . . �{ . .- '�t � � > � j '�� '`d` � ` � r � . �" '� �C�$"�� *��>.� "' � �_ � � � � � � ; . , , � . � ' � n.]. y� �. .; � i..5 ��' :`L „ ,� ,� �. �� , ' � � ` , � •" .. . . . �^ �4?4 .� � � . � +� . , �' � , � ' � ,, . , „ y�; . r . ,C4-1'c�� ,.�,_�,� t,r � _� � . � . �.� �- , �:�� "' f.��. �� ..�� w '� ,F w � `V-, � � . �' _ f��„ �. �, " ,�' ----�--__..._.._—__.__---- --- � � M��. a�� .. ,} r�� i � <>�;� .� � . . ,1 � ,�,. d -- 4t,�c,�'�" �r��5 £�'a° �; �r��: ' q 1�:M... ..} . � ;� � ` � �� ,'��:'." ;3 �� ,� � � � �..,- dc.''�` � �" �� y�p�, 1 'q�.>µ .. . f ; � +�y 7'� ,: _ � . ' "� ` � . # x�-� �, �. ,•; 1 ��Y/171L��'� . � " . ' �'J".` . °_ � . ..>�G �°� . � ,s.. � . a �... � �, ��,a;, � "c , `1 . ; ,k � � ` ..-----"`="'�"' � � � b�� , , , ..._. \ y , ti-J ----'�'�- � �� .. �""_.�_._ _-____ __.__ '"a , � — , ---------�- d��y ,� � - � —--- ^��' �" �s � �+ ` � Tle'i 4.� ,�00 `�, ^: . . . ,. . . • , ; '. . �,(', 4>.! ' A._. �" , �. � �� . . . . 1 '. * " . . :N,K � . _, '� . . g 4_-...� , ,�qa y M 6.� �1 3�4. -. , . +vi{wL � - , R^ G yh". .�w ��t� � }i} �` ��tX..nk J�; �yf Y � ,si��. � _ `.�. . . YN �� . �� -%'R: T �,.r � �� `t� " `� ;,:.;�,, y;a " ; a � '� ,� , � i� g �+e"�k f` `..� � F�� _ � ..� 1'v . � . � '��, �"'' �xi" � . , � ' s"'�++' #i: X'4 W f ��,T 3°,. t.. . � ;l= y� ,� . .. i��. •'7 s �.�.�u �+'>.� �'# t �j�. "� �r�. � �' �'�,i' h�` � " ih� m� y" c �: �i y4'�`v ^4 '� �r �ti .� ; �'. . .. , , °J � O ,.._+s - r �, ��' . � I .. • `�,� �, ��!}" ?h£ `�.� . �,J. �e 19,C5��' ` ',. �'�� ,,;,� �`- �.,,, ' �� '� � i ''� , ,,. 4 y �...� � � , .�, � � y� . �Y. . . i ro': n j ' .. � "'L �"� '.,i� �, - � � rz.. .�` ' �„,�,�..y ' �'y� �y'" + _ -;.._-� a. : -.� ' • ,�- '' ,. .-S.' . j . . , d � .�� P f� � �� ' � ` / L � y, � � " �� *� �`'_,�� f� e � /�''� �. C� �-y�l .�. �!�',� � ,.� ��./ ^i �{k �� YM X� `°' a:e £r R `, � {* . ' ++'' . ; '� � } � � ,i �' ��'. ':� =.�' �` .�y� .� ��" ♦ 1 Y1�� f e. �."` iS�•� �, ,�, ; . T _ : � �� tx � '�A. � �r �`9 �♦ . � �� ,,� �,� � �k�"�.. ,,,�.,: � � k"'` �"�i = � ,.,, u, '�'+�'" �, ,+� � . ` ._�,�'` � ' .'�h - ��'i � • .�`" "� ��- - �� .��, � p .. ty + � '�� .��.. � '� � ,� r, , s. « r I ' 1... .k..� � �f� .. 1 � ''y�:'�`.�"'F , ..'+J�+�.'7� �f � ��"�Y `�I {;y�. ,DS�-4 � ��f �� y�� '�� "�"� � � - � '"� ��,' � ��,�� , i '�'� �' � ` . �:• ��. �„ �-k= ,�,' I I � . � � ., . > � w �, ��.. . �� , y� cx , .�.�,. �. :�� a, r: � � ' � 19,D5-5 ,:«, ;;;� j � , � . � � '__,_..,`_�i, +��;� --�---�- �. •`�. ` � � `` � +� . , � --�='!� ,-�� r �:t k,, �. _ �� .''i � ,s � , '- , � . ... . �. ` �r ,z `�' , � � ��. � ,� � �� * . . ;� � .�' : .. �� ;$�,. i,. �� ..�� ,� - �. �� +; � ,r `�`'� "��;i'r� ��': ��. 1�,E6-i �y � i�,' ' ,3 �R �r . � . . . �- �`'. � �►A'a. s y. ��r� . . � �4 h _ , p �" � ' �� {«„ �rvD � �r . .r�,". ; m`�� y� ;#� � � � j.. '� � �+ t;, ' � e \� / • =�F ' �� 'T�. ..� �' �` A.'�.� �.7�'iN � ^7'�'� � v a ' Y ..w P;, ,ir '�. ` .\ . ' ,� . ��yq ,, �is � ,� ,. .. �y� ` ,...,y�Y+3.x_, , ,. , t k . 1\ . . �� ?� �3i� � � J�,�. �• ` 1xt f.., � � 1 ��, � �'�T.�� .� .. � . , � ; . x ,� � . .: '� �^F l.,.r'` t d 3,., �'` � "d.�� t �, �� '� i '�.b'1 • • 4a � � ,: K �� .. .A. .� y <� `�� , � ' "��' � � y � �k y. ��x p�. x��. , , *+ �"'C � �� ';: .. �,X s-�'��' • �x'�"'�� a� * A � �� -� ��.��a � ! + � �° �Y�. ,' r � �'' '`� � a g��'�� '"��+�� `��a� y � � �,� °°�,*�� .� � . �� , , , �. , , i '� _,� . \ -t ' � 4 « 4�+,, �, � x y� `�,��,,E6-2 *�:� r� a». �� . � ' �� ... '�d. . 4 � , g n' �.�AiA ' \. S> .# i o� �w7�� , . � .. �� i�� k . � � �,, g�D�,, a '�, ,�,� �� '_� ,, � �;, ,,� �'�' r� � ,,�' � � t. .'� y e'��' , .,i'Y �. ..M4p` . �,�,yk; R',. j '' S+' ..4, t ' f,. �,. � a � �...- i,.. .s ...,C}, �. . R 'H4 ,- . .'�. Y 'i�� J,:i..'..+ �,, , , -� �� "+� y • >. < r � ,�,Y �:`� rp ' .q y :. M,. IL�y � � ..bY,. �. �"��d, - . ,. �}.y+, , -.:. � .. f. y„ . . � Fy.� j .Ltj fJ��y., " �� , � V � �.y � �, �i-° �' �� r`Fa 1!u i �� ,�� • �`�'', .'�� . , k,�� e b ` � �. *� � .,~ ��.N� : ^ 3 1 'W.: .W+P'.� \`, � � � ��. . M t`�.' $s �� .r '...'1C� t . � � , ; ` , C `��9 D ' 1 � ,�` ,-„`;�'.'#* � �« �;� � .� a 'Y � t'�,�,, �` / �+ �y`4 � �� -.!' �..ry �+. \„ �� .1 �+ . i� . #Me' ' ;r {:.'zi!'� f` �� .• . . j �� , �"�� .��* � ... » , � . � . . , , � ,- �. y '..,. . ,. �. ' .'., . , , ^,k�, ,�s.,, ,�- • .1 . . . . .. � , w t,-.�� , . .. ... � � �, . .., .. 0 200' 400' LINDBERG ANEXATI�N 1 :2400 , � --.._..... . .. i�� .. ,w w�i.a� v ��...v.,� � .1.7� lo / --- � - �--. .. . - -.-''- - ; - .. i tV.0.77 r.1�1/10 ' G / ^ �/ . � . � , . . . . .. . _ } . .� .- � _. . , . _ . ' . . . . ... � - � . ��.: �_ .f. ....� . �� .. . ' '. . . , _ . . � . . . . '� . . . -� ... � � i � '.: '-. .: _ �. .�. . . . . . . + ,� . ; ; : (1��N,; , ---� - - L i�rr1> f3�1?G �. .; ✓ir�r�x•g-�,� � � �,,� • ; _ . .r��r ' ( , ' 1 . � 'aw�a+r�a.,s . . . I . �� . .. •pt� `f ' ��vr:ox �e-so�r `�, . � 1 AT TifE FND OF fKW W�AY� O . � � ca+i�ncros�ru�u ewac r��n e9 . � ��s ia•�� O �: , - ,wo vew�+�ccss to nl��4mti+.�E., �.E. ses.o -� �, � . R--O-M'SOtlf11 OF t71t�4TAEEi. • .��i-..f . ,y� Mf 1 L C8Z ' • � ' f `\, � . �1 `\,� C. �?�t �' �1,y��.;'!.��.��'�I f �/,��.��5`ja'i j^Y'�''��'Yhj`�i^�I�Ly��f'`.N'1�P�2�}�Y�1'�+'�'Y I.E Hr��.Y �� a � . �i �a83. .. - kr _ l + , � - - ' IIo+do � 2f.e�00 '�� ~_ RE110vE iJ'.fE .- _ . E 1 EO.M R�N I �� yJ ,\ `' � � .� � tAA�El�a� SS ROAD L _ ' . . � ��- �,d' A ._.... .. � lE t E-�60' Z �. O _ _ — �."' �5 _ . � -�2t .ap '_� �"�'" � • � \ � � , r�� { Bu{M /iS ` "' � - — —_ _ _. ` � 11 lF 1e'�twLf . 2 '''• 1 � � a � ws'�u �n eau.wo r I.E. 72'C4P . J88.25� ^. •�.• ^ -- CJ�SCH BtiSIN �ib '� IStpp _ S � �7� _ . _<,� � ET 4 DO fl J8a ( . - - • - . �i,{0V� . � �� 5 � STII� O(lJ�1fls . _. , ...._. . _ ._.. _ .._... -.. ...,., ...,....__, • -� _ .,,�;.-,. . ,�~ — . .. Rpa�PN vLUGGfNSOIlTH APL RECO DKS�RU � R�,IiWE D ._1� �-£�e�T� . •� < / { .i0 EIFYA ]8o Of UC CT • �� I N G �Q ' g _ `� � \ ` . ' �GH TO 12' CMP.TO THE SOUTH.) , ��T ' � ' I ` � ,�� ' •.� 0 oato '� C'7 � � 1: , •. . .. _ 1HSTnti �' � + • 'e ��' , t � r-I . ��. , ,. ,' : : . . Ty9E 1 � S1RUCiURE�; � 2o a �o aa EO . �aopa.� .: . C}wNLI K � , 9GI.E W f£ET � , , / fiAT'Q r. � ;� �- . .. . /r. N ��\ � lOt 1.fC SP EB i 05Q .. .. ` �� ` .` " � I �.'I t I 1 � " �8� ��I� I . •• � • ! I ��I � � H/�b vpr{p � 1 ,�x • � � - . � ` ^., . . - }, �� 1 � , ��: � -�"� �� + � ; � �� ► � ` ; / '. M1 � - ._ ' .__ ... ' . .. ... ' �.. .. . .. . I b� ` 1 �I . � — — � '. _ ._ _ .. _ . , � ' . I� I I 217 . �� l- � � . . �- . . � I .. . _ . i � ---. :��; � � � ; �t,�°�o�� ; �, � . . . � _ _ . . : . - .. � � I � � N � � . ,� �.� ;v��oa� � ��: ► t�,, . . . . � ' ' CATCN BASIN �15 . ; � CATCH �ASIN �16 . � I I ' ? � � �V .....392,00..! ...... .. 1 , � = ' . . t�.,�7�7..�6.�7,...... '_ ..... . _ _ ... . _ ' ...... . . � , . . � ....,...,.. 392.00 ' � ' , .. .. . . . ..... .. ..... .. ..; ..... ...:.........,...,...�..... .. . .�.. . . ' � .�..E...?6�3855 89..!... ... _ . ...... . . . .... , _ ; '. ; • : � E 167�660.50 : : �� PiP4---_�.. ` • AroD�Nc �J : tG : � . . � f s ( : �� OuNU �r ; . � Q�• � • , uC'�RJNE�f : : ; : ; O : .` �S� . , M �.� .-- . _........_....'..... : � ` SiR : . . 390.00 t- . . - ' . - - • - ..................:...._...t+1.. .. : `� . W • a W _. .. ..... ...... .... . . . ........ . ._... . ...... .. . . _ . . ....... . , . _ . . _.... .. . . _. . .... ... ... . . .... I �� . . ._ �-. . ...I........... .. � . �..�?..�� . . _E "�^ .,,... : . � ��,r�`� : ` i i . . • d . - ' . . . . a o ' �\ _ .� ' ,c. ..y. .,;... .. F .. ��.QD ,J Z , � . � , . �,�~� ��• �� i � t-� W� � " -.-' _ ... . � � ' , � - . . 388.00 w : : ` : ; � � ..._.... _ � �se:oo ' r ....... .... :.. . .. . � .. . � _ .. ... ... .. _ .. . ... .. . .._... ... . . . ......... . .. . _ .... - . . �. .. .... . . ... . ....... ... .. _ _... .. .: . . _. . :. ... �� , , ; � : ' : � : � , � s ` .... �.. . : .;;. cg z _ � `� � , �a� � � , � . � . . . . J � . �, . . . . . . _ _ ( •\\. : � � : � ' ; ; : �,�,3��,�� : = _. , � (�EwTo N . : ` ; : : : : .. 386.00 : V : . .... .. .. ...... . ........ . ... .,...... ........... , 386A0 i� ............... ....H... .......... ..�... . ......:._........ .....` .... . ... ........., ............ ..... . , . ....... . .... ... � i � :. ...... '_ ...,... ...:.. . . : •�. �� . : � ` .�. ..;. ,.. ,;... !. . � . . • Q : : : : : , , , I ...:.. , ... . .. .. ..'... .... ......�............. � . ..... .. .... .. � : , � � ; � ? ; ` � i : ; : � � ; -3 ; , � _. . � _._ , _ . � t�L.F' � � ' ; , N=1Z � .6. ... 3B4,0a..: ...o. . . ... .. ... .. . .�, .....,_. . ' ,...". . .. . .. .. .. . . .. .,. . ? ...... . . .... 3�. 2 -. . � .. .. ,...... .. .. . . . . .. � . . ,.. ...:.. ' � _ &Z.; .. .. . . . o •(�.sx- 38 : • ' • : : , : ; ' '_12 5 F 0.6R 0 l.f � 6.. .. ... ' • ��TRASH RACK 4.0 _ . .. ,. 12 - N�t .._$.. � � � ; ' : : � : t 65 L� 36" N� � ; �3Yj'Z,.'B � ° �EBRIS BARR►ER ' N-12 5 � 0.6� : ! • � �. ..382.00.; ....�.. . : t59i-tf 36": _ :....�rs,q.�. ....;. . . .. . . . ... .. . ... _. ... . . ... . . .._...... ..... ... . .. . .. . .. . .. . .... .. ... _ .. ... .. ,_.. . .. ....: . . . 3�2.• O . �. . : ! ... . . 3 .; � ,. .noM a�.ao � : �ti-�t �- ; ; � : : � : � ar a� w/souo.�oc�Nc ua � . i.�. �",�.�.��1� � ; . : ' � ' = 5 .5 +;l- �,--�, . .. C8 7YPE � • : , : 380,00 , .. .�.. . .. ... ..... _ :......... �.. ._ .. . .,. �......... � .... . ....: . : _ �. . 8Z�3.' . .. ' .. .. .. ��,�. .... 380.00.... ...__ ... . _ _. .. . . �---•� , ; :. ' RIN Ei.. : . . . . ; : � � , ' ` : : NPE�2 ' , 3 � C9 T(PE 2, 5F" W/SOLID,LOCKIAIG L!D : C8 ; , 72' W/81RDGtGE : ; ; � ' -' o , . �RI�1 FA.. � 390,5 +/ , : , � �E �3�285� � , - ' - 3�B4O0 � � _I.E. g 381,14.. .... . ... ... . �...._.. ,.. ..._ ..... . . ....... . .. .. _. .. .... .� ..... _. _. .... . . .. ..... ..... . _ . . . ... � i stoo . ,...... ._ _ _ • .• zo+oo. . .. :. ........ �,+bo '.z�+oo ' : 378.00 ��23+00 �p, qo No._�t1 SMEET '9URVEl'ED: 7�-06 � APPIIQJED:.F'wa� PARS�NS rf a�SSl1�/'� � � �.�P lQNG COUMY DEPT.OF NANf�AL f�680UfjG� 7 � dtse Mu ►IAT. - PR�q: ��.0 N��F?a_ p r. ._a*E � . ��'�`', 1 PAM BIS50NNEfiE. oIR£CTOR ' � � t SuRFACE WATER - ENGINE��NG ANO EpMRONMENTAL SERviCES af � �� _ �N u,,,,,��. P� a"� s'�'�,r "°-� � ,rt�� PUGET' COLONY H4M�S $ FtF1D moom o��aNm:�wrtror w�a�. o r_ C�TE: . " 9N�1�� SNEETS �,,,,y,�,� �,u.�,Y�c o+Te {NUNTEi�LWCE DM� No. a � FLOOI7f�lf]�PF10VB.�-PF�A�2 �, � ��oN � �,� -- - �w-^�� MAP—NO 2003—t1(7) 7 � i � _ x x . . .. , . � � . x �. ,_. , �. ,,�ai , � ., , r i � � �r � 'tPd2,;� � , ..;: --l_ n ; -- -_� „ � �� , ,=z� .<<� —�� , _ � , .z�� x ' — , ;,,,� ,,;�� xF�� , ' � J _ 19 E2 �fl 1 19 D2-10 �.F �� _ � 19�,D2- �' :ti� � -' 19,E�-3�a�� ,-, �� i � . -----___.__�_ 19,E2-29 , � /� � � � � � s ,� �i��:�� i --- _ �; i Y'.Z{.95 �' I� } p� 1�i. I),I.' _l I'J F� 19� ,A . i / �F � � ., !` '�.� . .... ... _`..�1'i.f�' 1 ' , ,. . / \ �. . `21. .: ' � \ ' / +xs-ae -- ' � � ia.r� i � n _._ o-. �..._� __,�. � �i � �(.� � �� ' 12F3-3 f9E� �, 19E3 , � ��" � . � ,2��Pa x , � � i�� , � � ,,; �� ' , �� xi:i.��x � �.� .__...��. �� i> 4 ?. �} x'7o, f �� ` i , __ s—:=. <, -_ � jj_{_ {{ j � �' ( � � / . � i��I�i i-�, i9.f;1-7 19.C.?.-f3 �j...} 1 , : � t , , � , . , ��.0 �i� � �} ", _ _ -- _ — � � x ,, ...=. � � � ,r,_as '` y x . x � . � ... �2t.N � �� . �...�� .,. „ _ . . . . I� �7272 � � iaaes� � x � �� z ��'� � ` � �� .�� ', �� __ 1` � � �4 � � �' � EY�A�� 1�.�e/ . .rr. � � - ' ��;� . . . . , . x, ,,. .,. ,u„ X •W, ,z,!. X � � ,� � I � � �1 �. PQ�,a � 'o k , t � �� _ ; .-x �� _ — „ _ �_ ,,. . _ ., , �� T- � , � x,�,�; ��, .__ , �--- � � _. �� ; / _ �, , –— . � � � ; ,�.�: L��/!>l3ED?G� � x , � � ��S:e��,� �� i��ivEXa�ian• � �� bPL � 171.�1 i'13-1` k� � 121J6 ./ . � '� 142�3 � �;'• .,X .. � ��1 �... �. , x , .. �i� x�si eo � �� i . t73.l6 i� � � ' . '�. .. _.. .._... x I i . � _ _, + ,zz,� ,a � N� � . . 1L1.H . . �', k . x � _ _ ___ .z.�,- � Z� _ ___ . o -- —�.J J X � � � ,�� ,� ,�� % . �� .�, , �, , , �, �� x,�.,o � ,z�u , x ; � �� ,z..0 ' � . I; -- `��4- ,.�� ' �" ; , 1 , , ,, _ j ' / � �aoeo ; y y .� � � � �� , � , �� j X x�. q V , i �� ,1.L, 9 C4-7� �—^ -- — � ,��.a� x�,.z� �, . � x i.�.�.r. � _ . i].L.a 'i�.cr . � . 9,C4-8 — " . . � � , � ��. � _ � 9,C4-12� , ,.�\ : , � \ ------ _ , ; �� x ��, � ; 1 1 V � -�_ � �� , �.__ � �� , , � � �- � � ,�..� � , _-- - - __ . . \ � „K� `� _ � � ' ' ' � OPF GfM�/�'E �_ ' ,�:�. � . X,: ' � , x x _ �, ,��.:, �19,D5-3 „ ,.. . CA'� �i Gf EP —1---- 5-�� --- - _�,�,.s7 — � �L I .�rv Z %\ ��, � ,� ' �. x�zo+. - ,D5-1 � t � I , i � � ,4� -- ` ' - � _ f ,p.r x � i � �� • � } - . - � X ,,.� - � ,ti:� � � - �- �� .r., `..� X 120.N \ � , . . 5... . _.. ._ . '\ . ... �O . ' '1';nt � �,. ,�. .. ., � ��.. —'_ �\ ,�'..,. ' 120.10 � . . 19,C5-? � _ � N ; _ . o . I , f ��, � ,�w % � o� � � i� ,.�., � � � ��°� \� � � . � . i i � n�.se ., �� s.� �� ' � . � - I x n . 1'�M1!� , �� '� x�xias —�b � .. ��,,�\ `�\ . , .� �n s, , � .,. . .- . 't: --.------- . I � `�_____--_ � 1 ��; � � �� , �, ..� � � � � ,D5-4 . � �� , .�..._ � r-= � > .__. _.._ , --- ., � � � ,..ae� � -- . �. �:�-� A . � .. , � � � 19,D5-S � '—" � � , � '\ _ 1 i I � � \. \�` ,.� a °'q�°� �� 19,E6-1 ,v � � � . , c . \ \� \ \\ .,. . . �� .. ' �;�� . / � .� . . �. � ��V'��; �, , � � � � �� i ��V i�� • � �`� . � \ ( � �--�� `��''�' �� `�� '' ` � • � � � �� V �' �' � � ` �'�'��`' �� '�� , , � V 1 �� 1�� '� � , '� �� , �� ,��,�;��;;��,�,,1;;��, ,�� , � � i, ' , �,;� � q � � � � ' ', �! �'�� 19,E6-2 _ \ � 9,��=z ��l;��l�i�l�';,I�;ii�,,;,,,,� ;i,�,,��, , ��; . 0 2 0 0' 4 0 0' ,,,�, � . ��,� „�,, , ,, ,� � , l `I , � . � 1 1 \� 1'�� II�I ' �I'ii� � • II�Ii�I� , � � �1� I f/ �\ , ,` � �` �I �I I�I I II I 1 \ . 1 l� �`,�\I'� �I1,II�I�II1.': • I � � 9,D6-1 � , � �� ,i��i�� ','i��'��,��li��,��I i�, � . � � � 1 :�4�� / � \ � � �� • � i - • . LINDBERG ANEXATI�N ' v • Annexation Review Form [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation �� `�' ' '` Current Planning �` ., ,y�d.: .- ._:�.,�:r,� :;,::;�;� FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Lindberg Annexation, A-04-008 Location : The proposed 10.11-acre irregularly shaped Lindberg Annexation is located south of NE 4"' Street abutting the current City boundary on its north and portions of its western and southern boundaries. Basically, it is north and east of the recently incorporated Carlo Annexation, earlier this year. It's western boundary would be Duvall Avenue NE and most of its southern boundary would be SE 133'� Street, if extended (see attached map and petition). Date Circulated: November 4. 2004 Comments Due: November 18, 2004 General Information Area : 9.72 acres Street length : 410 feet (existing) Assessed Value : $2,448,000 Estimated Population : 25 people Current Uses: Residential : 10 Dwelling Units Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation : Residential Future Uses: : +62 Dwelling Units Future Po ulation • 155 eo le Reviewing Department/Division: P�!•L �D21�S �a��.�,..a:,�,�c— 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or signi�cant problems for your department/division? /V� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? /v (Over) r . ,,� Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2 il/04/2004 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �� 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �,Q�--�- 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? � 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) Nv General recommendation and comments: �'-'10 �� . � �,/ Signature: �,G�'""��,,c-,��[ Date: � � � f �— C� 1 � � ` � � �-0�-008 �.i��` �!?�; -• ��:�;t: :�4':.....,?'c. v ;::��a'j' o; � '"�: '�Pe _':�, e Gi *.# �.1:i:N NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS '�`-`'�``"�--" - ..�3; :` .�.._>.:�`.:' .. ....=f�".,,. UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) � 10%PETTTION— �— ��d�-+'�" ANNEXATION TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF SUBNiITTED BY: �� M �"'�' �� `� � THE CITY OF RENTON �D1t�ss: 7'. � , /3�� Z � i�� City Hall, c/o City Clerk �2Q„�-, in/4 9�oSia 1055 South Grady Way PHONE: Z�„-��o •3�� Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) of the assessed value of property within the proposed annexation area which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A legal description (Exhibit A) and map (Exhibit B) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. 1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept,reject or geographically modify the�proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city � indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 � . ti WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) ,o�,� �� 1��3C� �� l.�l� -��.'��,� 1. �� l`�i4�t� �4� �.� �3 /c'�►�'t� 4J�- `'f�c� 2. r0�2 ��- 13�3.s�--�� — �,��t� e� �,a.w,._ � . �.� ,��, w�- ��i 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. lo. Page 2 of 2 H:�DIVISION.S\P&TS�PLANNING�ANNEX�10%Notice of Intent(re�s).docWE 04/19/04 , � r - LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION SITE Tax ID Legal Description 152305-9207 STR 152305 TAXLOT 207 W 149.29 FT OF E 47929 FT OF N 99FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 152305-9044 STR 152305 TAXLOT 44PP ACT 39923958 MOBILE HOME LOT 3 KCSP 676075 REC AF#7701190691 SD PLAT 152305-9206 STR152305 TAXLOT 206 PP ACT 39924055 MOBILE HOME LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 152305-9205 STR 152305 TAXLOT 205 LOT 2 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 8303160822 SD SHORT PLAT DAF 152305-9222 STR 152305 TAXLOT 222 PP ACT 39924071 MOBILE HOME LOT 3 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 152305-9223 STR 152305 TAXLOT 223 LOT 223 LOT 4 LESS RD OF KC SHORT PLAT#882065 RECORDING NO 830316-0822 SD SHORT 152305-9037 STR 152305 TAXLOT 37 S 99 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SD SEC LESS E 330 FT& LESS 152305-9082 STR 152305 TAXLOT 82 E 330 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS C/M RGTS 152305-9177 STR 152305 TAXLOT 177 N 99 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1!4 OF NW 1/4 LESS E 479.29 FT LESS W 20 FT 152305-9048 LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 881050 RECORDING NO 8201220536 SD PLAT DAF-POR OF S 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF NE1/4LYNOFSE132NDSTLESSE30FT LESS W 30 FT � . . , ;p , , ...,�� i � i ' I ��'-.,l.�-� � ' . ` - . 1 r�. �n.. �� i= �� : ' , .....�_ ' r"�],-- � � . #�� } ; �� . ,� �` � � � . R —"�- i � � • � � +;�.y�. �� w,�,. R F �,,,..., � Y � : � S — `� ,� `� �I' • �, � , r .� p � � -- . r1 .sr n� t � i + . 1� �� O- M /4� � � ' . � ,� � � , �. 1 . �t� si��i i �.` j �f4 'I.�/+Rlit�� . +i[YiI �1 f :r. W y IIRM M. �/I[•fII �� I�W , kMl 1 1 w�.n 9i�Ml M1YH �� .4nv�r µ • —.�-:»w� 4 Y � �' �—3t�i1Y NL/►1~•tlp fiv•Y+aJ ��• � � "r �'r' [ � .�vi�..�� k •'�7�, ,�� m '' i�� •�� ') � �� j�>> .t ... a • ..;..—� « � � � • s, � ' ��`' e"J :6 . § � '� � � �`� --- ' � , � _ --x- v- j; , �,�,�:i� � L I L:.• � � �. � �� z �----r.� � _; _ . . a . � ��;I �� ;�:,,�, ��p � -�:j—i. �► � -�-- A � « : n pp� - kfl +r.u' '�_- �• '� r �� .� �3~ ;�� R €{ '� � .�: � " g r �, § $ -�• - 7 ' O "� >�� i� i � . - .•... ,.� �V► ,�� --;;,--,,,,'P►�':'z —..,�`-. ti � ..�..,. 7Mr p�tM v.ti�.r... a�.w ��1.� 1 �.w i ; . � . f»sa�l9i'3IWb1A1 'w �� ' ��MM�I M � • ♦ � � �...�� VI ♦ t � r � Q � .�� i .�,e � �.�=• � � e :• :t � i 1 �� e t .i � �,.. � '`�''�- , � t. + 4 "a� �� i 0 �t i k -*r" _' o r ••aa � " I ,�_ �Y� ��, � � ` �•� �1 � �,� �: 1• : j�� . , . U I' � I� �t � � �• b �� .'"'r+a Z u 4` 2 ti�: � ....--�-�------�k---.' i� � .. '��O ; o� woH , � � 0 ` � Z � :;y ; �� r �• a � � i13� ' � � � 4 � . �t �� 4 � ,, a , ----�r ' ri� � e �. 7�i � !� �► r� �. �t� ��t t � t�� i � � . 1 �� ;'' +1r �•ti e � , R Z �� `�S ^` , �� . � _ —•— . . � '�� a�` a . :� � �----�I--==�-„— .�.,. =E t � . _.�__— ..,. _ „ . v ..... .- -� ---- � - ----------- �. ` ,. ,oar? .� ,rV,rl,E ' � �._ • . ._._.__ ~ • -w.4�.......... 3S 3A�w . �'jC...�----------� � . ' .. "" """"' .._.. � ' � �e i�� yR" '_ ni W �. � � :1 � �• y i . 4�� .O . � , S . � $ � _ � I I i 4 �$•- --�,--1-z,z, -•- --� , � � � �.�F, �. ' _ � �� m� ' � � � � � �, =--�--- � � s �` _ � €� � :� � �I .� s�; '� � I �,�� t� � ' � — � ' Z � _ _ �:� s � a,,� I . . N 'i0��-- � � � � 1� , I . � � � � lN�1M�wr 71w �w• � S �\ N I !K•I)i I+�v)i �Vt w �y g - ' sw�r. � 3IYI Ni K � ' �:�r ' � n - r w � '� wr r�w. ir �r�[ e�� SOy �� A� `+�� y�o� i �� w ~ • 1� i� i�� Y� ,�O �l P � n ! • I � � � � � � q � p�Q ��f� � � � � � � I �I �I 1 �l y0� am=--- i �- � � 4`� � , � 1 . 4 '� � $ ; � �;o�� ,,, �j _�. 1�.. �o , ��R � ._�._ � 4 �`I .�i � "f' : a�+� � f vR iN YM. .J�t� � ! • . P�O �� . ,5.�.t � �� --�--�I � �, - . " . i �� ° � ,, � ,� :.,� � " :d�' � � � 1 S �� , s� �, + �'p+ � � � I .� � r f �f � . �� - i � ; �� - - . � � �a� ' � g�� . I �— �'� , � , � � I� """"'� 3 i � S ` � �e �s.yw, q .»..». l__.r . !si -'.�/�- »..r � — �.•:�� 53 • -----••----tQ7s.i-^� n s� �' • t+•• , tN � � a�... ...�'..�''.^' uwrM> •.1 � �� A R �� ! � S` � X +� � � ~ � 1 y , ,. �, , =+1I �� •�; arw,w,a,uw •• j � • �{ � y ..,� � � �� , � a ` 'f �• � � s 1 J r...�._.__._ _. _8 l� �1� �... , ti Renton � ��T_ _ ---- Renton City Limits � � � � � � � � � � a,, � � , � �� ,�� z � �, � � � � �� \� � : . �� s°�� a�tep '� �S s��:.,.�' �� a� � .E� ;� x: � ... � . Parcels ' �� aQ �� =�� e� �;� �: � "�� v vik� b: n��,. rk� ,, q'�e�� ,,:� S� ;e � ' �� c� q,� � RentonAerial � � � °;� � :��,�. ,e $ -�f �e ,�'e." � � �� - P i � �:,»�".sk`"- ^ a . `� �� k � ��a;m�� k � � � � �i � b ��p,��+ �I�,� �� k��,n � ?� �� .�r�,�.^�.�'_, :. y �Gn >;r . �.�� eq , �.,, " .� ` .y » a � tinq��;��„ �i �^.,_. � . �,� `e' ,$ �"u ��k d6 F .. � .... . .� .•'.y � o� ��!��! .. y 5c � ...,� g�, ' s �v r°.,�• "�'�',..�»:-.n�r: �... � � ��. ��a �E �'� �c �wi�;i � . � �.s�d hd � 'd � �� ,,� � � ��' '_ ,.,_.� � .._ .�� ti�n � . � � � .7 _�w: i �. � M1� t� ',� �' �< ' '�_ •� � �,�-�.�.. .. 'F�, n� F �r a�'�.d�"M 3°� �� v k ° �— � � �� . '� ; �„ � � e �.$ ��° �- � � x, a � o � � � � a � n. � a.:�� ' � � t� �'' �a �� d' � rT"�fi �" � � `�� < - N� �,. �,� '��' ��` � ��E:_ "''�dsw �� .rr�' � x � � .� �g,�^�! §'.. k�.. ��.�� ,� �� .:a��., , � . . �. �H� ..� . �, . �., �. �'��`^' �, �� d { ^,aF,�. . �:�� r N� �. �� r r ' �� a��. � � ��E ,, �� . z i�`��{�i�"' . . �aa- r a ,s�s� �" �° a*�„ �.�`�-x^^�� g. .: ��.,�,�s� .. s.x � � �� '�:,�� c �� `� ' �� r '��.+ � � e� � �' � �;�&'.�'�� ' C A a� �"k� �. ' � 3�� `� v �, �." � 's � '�' .,' � � h �� '� �. a�� a�j�� ";� ri.uc� a � y� . "� +�° �g. . ..� ,a; � �v.��'i��i�k�� e a � � �' ' °d '� `�'� �'�� , �„ °'��" .,� < ,_;�w �t a � � ' � � � G c. e �-+��,�, . a�as"-":^"�,^��;"*'^.+�...iw,.sai�wk.a:' . '�,',,� �r+� i�s;�w� �' �� `�w �� ; � � �� "'� � q ��-. � � a� � � �� ' � � �� r a ;� � a � ,L � � '�b��.��.� c�`��"�»;�u'�; v �P�as�c�` `;� �°r� t . .. �.� �di�6 .. � , a4:u. :i r ,S i'`� 1 6 i' f ��r�,y�� '� e,�"� lz r �a° �' � m .R t �"�.:�"i ro ° k �41� ' ry; � . , � p � � � � . .�.�, :,�. ad ,�� ,� ��- dF ., � �y �- � ,A � i � �,�` � �� ;� �'�a3�: �"��`� ��a��u�a�; ul�o.��'�� ,s� t'„`.. � �� 4 ��t � F� �"� y. � +�'-:� �}"` � ii�' , � �,^i � �" 'r� .� 3 � g� R� �< ' �, � � �{ a � � ��. ,� 9 mr � �� a " _ � � �� a'd� :,� ; � ,�8 , � : �� x � a ._: 6� _ x,�'�� Ui�1 t .� �� r. �+ar� -$— - - - �='� � N SCALE 1 : 4,156 200 0 200 400 600 FEET http://rentonnet.org/MapGuide/maps/Parcel.mwf Monday, November 08, 2004 11:47 AM ' � _ u�.�.. �� , ' �' '.�. , > .�a��fi��'�° - :i`.�'•� � ��,�� "' : . �.�� IIIUV D 4 2004 .� ci�v Annexation Review �or�qpV � 0 2004 UT��,�RS��N � � C� N MIC UEV [X j 10% Notice of Intent 6, 90��rRRrEG,c P�nr.r��r�� n TO : Building Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks ,�:�, ,.... � Police ransp io�n`� Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Lindberg Annexation, A-04-008 Location : The proposed 10.11-acre irregularly shaped Lindberg Annexation is located south of NE 4�' Street abutting the current City boundary on its north and portions of its western and southern boundaries. Basically, it is north and east of the recently incorporated Carlo Annexation, earlier this year. It's western boundary would be Duvall Avenue NE and most of its southern boundary would be SE 133�a Street, if extended (see attached map and petition). Date Circulated: November 4. 2004 Comments Due: November 18, 2004 General Information Area : 9.72 acres Street length : 410 feet (existing) Assessed Value : $2,448,000 Estimated Population : 25 people Current Uses: Residential : 10 Dwelling Units Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation : Residential Future Uses: : +62 Dwelling Units Future Po ulation • 155 eo le Reviewing Department/Division: 1��,fq/�� 1. Does this anne ation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?� ��A � A �e,! Gf��E�l� f��%�f•'� �'�>� 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficienc�i s in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? /J� �d,¢R��ES �ai �;�E �� z�TGy��[��. fr ✓l�f� ��✓�G�� !/v�l�T��,�DrX�i �� /�r.��/�/L� �J��/�G�� XCh%d'�IO�S„ (over) Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2 ' 11/04/2004 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? �,�5� �� /G� y 4. What additional facilities or staff would be requir�ed to serve thi area? an you identify any othe�costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?`�,,�,�� o�� 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? �f � 6. Would alternate boundaries create a mone logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) • �/ ,LC� �6��'' "/ JL� �r/Vi'/(/�� /��" ��G��/ � � � f,t/� �?�� ✓o�� -� ,�� i� ,�u�f��r �� G�. /�� General recommendation and comments: ¢��w��;�� yr��,� � � f � � Signat � ��te: 1 � � � . �-o�-ooS �..��Y��.: �ii... ..�ti,+=', ;';f« a „_s � ,- �,,;�: -'�� 4 :.�} �,:,:.: NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS ;__;- J'f:-r-_ '`_� .._ � .. _�,- v_ UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) 10%PETITION- �- 1��-►�� ANNEXATION TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF SUBMITTED BY: �� M �"'�' R`'� `� � THE CITY OF RENTON ADDRESS: P. �? , !3�x 2 s t�� City Hall, c/o City Clerk �Z�„�,-, in/4 9�o�io 1055 South Grady Way PHONE: Z�c„-��o •3�� Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10°Io) of the assessed value of property within the proposed annexation area which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The temtory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A legal description (Exhibit A) and map (Exhibit B) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. 1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept,reject or geographically modify the�proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the azea to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with� any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or sigr,is a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she i:� otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemean,or. The undersigned have read the above petition and consenl:to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) 1. ro�7o `�'jQ�" d��:.�C� S� l.�l� �� ,�i4� t,i � l��v v/� �'�� 2. ��'�2 �� 1�.3c�3..s�•�:� 1�,3/ — ��0� e� �,� � . �� ,��,�-�., r� ��.�' 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. lo. Page 2 of 2 H:�DIVISION.S�P&TS\PLANNINGWNNEX�10%Notice of Intent(rev's).dc>c�DE 04/19/04 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION SITE Tax ID Legal Description 152305-9207 STR 152305 TAXLOT 207 W 149.29 FT OF E 479.29 FT OF N 99FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 152305-9044 STR 152305 TAXLOT 44PP ACT 39923958 MOBILE HOME LOT 3 KCSP 676075 REC AF#7701190691 SD PLAT 152305-9206 STR152305 TAXLOT 206 PP ACT 39924055 MOBILE HOME LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 152305-9205 STR 152305 TAXLOT 205 LOT 2 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 8303160822 SD SHORT PLAT DAF 152305-9222 STR 152305 TAXLOT 222 PP ACT 39924071 MOBILE HOME LOT 3 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 152305-9223 STR 152305 TAXLOT 223 LOT 223 LOT 4 LESS RD OF KC SHORT PLAT#882065 RECORDING NO 830316-0822 SD SHORT 152305-9037 STR 152305 TAXLOT 37 S 99 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SD SEC LESS E 330 FT& LESS 152305-9082 STR 152305 TAXLOT 82 E 330 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS C/M RGTS 152305-9177 STR 152305 TAXIOT 177 N 99 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS E 479.29 FT LESS W 20 FT 152305-9048 LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 881050 RECORDING NO 8201220536 SD PLAT DAF-POR OF S 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF NE1/4LYNOFSE132NDSTLESSE30FT LESS W 30 FT 1 ....' i ' � 3 e I �� ' ` •• � ,',;r= t—+►.• ,� i t�� 1 � � • � � � , -�— � � � � ' � ..; � �I � � ' . �`' �4 � I � 1 ' � � � �„ g ' � �n n 4�.b � s—�"s.► , �"'` � Y ! I � +�� ' � � k M t . � � � ' o m�.. � � �•--� . , •� ��` • � t '� � , _t .i . ' � � . .� ,'�w •�� ' rYs�• y � pc � rcr.� . !.�.• ar r�K•ui ��1 __ �i a71I MlY►1~ — � t � V•� �'i � .w.r�. :N,n. � i _"3�t v N "'ne rsuww) '�-- � ! � � a«+ .r.e � ---�"'�c �0 �� +,� � � ,��s" '�� i � b� �� ? '—��.� � � �v � t • qa`' � �O '_ g r 'j -- ' . � � --x- ,.- �� ,� ,�.'�� L:_j � �, - , . � . a� I� �+ a� � � ��j�` � pA � w " : 'x ��! . . �� {� --,�.-�,�� z� • � . R ' s R � •-�.� � � § � N '7F• �""' f! O � ,�w� y�,.�,� � x ,,,,,� • y __..�... _� . `W � � 4 ..�..: 7� s aw waH .,......,�: rw.,e.��u�arv� ...... .-,r..r .,, Vl � i '—�'__• _.'—s.zcF---� "R+a_' .rw 1 � Q �� '�ss r r.��•�C'� � ` � ��j � _ � i i S ; .1 � ..,,, � � 'L: -- � " �' + � q`�{ 1� t $ i � wl 1 k 'r__' j �0� I • � ht � ��i � , � �:� Z� � q�� t 1 = � � � � � � . , • . � , ' ,�. �I ....__}_._._...ti�,` � � j� �0 � �• ; � ' '++.�+ �o� � N R�i i O ` + � Z j �� i;� ' � r�• � � � R � �3� � .� � _—o�c ' r� . � � �, tti' � �� _ � � 1� t�ls + 1 '�� I �'�� — ;,,` "♦ a� �� _ t : �R t 0 —' ` , �l � � ��i +'' �� a�� ' � —•—�---�--•—�-- .-�---�r W =� i � � . .. „ -...» ... �. ----- -- ' �l^ M liYi�' .MN �y� .. . . . . __.'__� 'M'AC.++rwlo 9C ']AY NLOM tfJ�'911 ___...__�_��_. • , w �^�'�CRJK'MO �er..�a� _ —.+ �f.i. . """ "..... e (r'� M a 1 ��- ....,��- -- �e, ' �� }0 .rr � � ' � � - � : � � �_ i $'� _ . � � � � � � , � N� .��_L��_ . � � � �'� 1 �'�� : ' �I � . � � �. � - • � ! j� •�� +�j�� i�� '� ` I � ' � �� ;;�) I . Z ' �. . . �61 ��- 3 � � � I i ,�, ' � . M � � . W.�Mrw i M N <, , tMy i I+ey)i ' '!i M �� , I w � V^y/I � n' � �� 1►• � i, �i� , Y•i/ i �� .,� �� i.� 3� _�a� � +;� .'�O �� :� i� �� '�}Q � �� , � � � , 5 j ' j � � , ' � z' �z a � � , , ��a M • �► � • , ' w " t � A I �� I ( � p01 � � '—a�--� � 4� � � � � ' � �_ � ��9 �o .. ' " ► 1 � .., �O � ! ; �'� �` � s ,�, � w, _�1 � , � Y.S.,.. { x a . � ��tiR � N fM�i1 � •�I ��jI �rI J � • !. ��.� p;O � * .�� ) � Y !4 i. �f ' •} � .• 7 Y � f - � � � � � S' v�� . +� �� ° � � ��; � ,� , - - � � ,�„� . � . I � � �� .,� � g t � 5 � � �ar.a�w. : r.....� � � • !� «� _' - � � w r.... � "".,,"'^�4'..' '* � `� . , ! . +�... �»,wfM Y�.t�> �.1 ; x � �' �e �1• �1 , !� • .� , � � � , y ! x+�l �� +�; �w j ♦ • � l ' � ----�--- ,I,� � �� r A� � 1� U �\ �� ` _ /`� ' ' � v � �1 � � , I ; ' �. �� --� r�� "'i n • � � �J r , �' 0 _ - . ��,� � -■ ;, : � Q:T^� ;, � C-�7 i,, C�ti 1 � � �,� . ��: � � a E1�..7 ti' !J� y � � I� ;. „ , � �� L� � �,, = � �l�1 L� i'�Ll �i*'i � �� c� - - • ��I �r C�LI � � - . _ _ -. �G _ �. � _ . r',� � .. ! � �'. � i��7 �"i �•1 � " �,,.� ` - � s �p �� V �� Q � �� .• �71� �� . __ � �� - v■. . � � ./. . nrx�nli4�r n�ayrr:. .� ` I� ��:i'i';�!`s:'.4:, '."1�Pi44'�)�. \ , , - � �,��'�'�" � � �� •�- � -� � ., �� ,� r ��.�' � 7_y �•�1► „��,�,� , ., �� f .�"J�� ! ♦ 1 � ,;�:�.� ,� r � -��I� . . .t� � (�,�w 1r � ,r��'�''�� = �✓' ":�♦ 1r►� ,;: � I�`� M�`� �� : . ;�� + �� . � ..f � r s ' �. i ` . � '� ` :�' `� '�C�� , � A ��, 1.. ,.� l .. ' /` ■ � �, � � , �� ` .� • � � � :.. �� ,�� ! �� .r �, ., �� . L,1 A �� . �� .� � .. � �„ o -.Je. /�o �� . '� i v' 4 ' .r� � �� ''�� ' \w;�� o ��• , �� . .. �- '��r � ��•�� . • , "'�. " ` � r ��►,��,j �� • r �.* . � iii �� a �� . = �r- � � � �� .. � � ��. � ��,�,``��e� `��' , � _. , ; „ � �:� ,, � • �'[�C�� C7�7C��tp �c.,`�► �•i;;�� .� , � � � ,r �3 ,�� r � '0 1a11�1� � �,, ��1�! ' � . ��a�� [+:� aD L�.► �� '`'..� �.r� � � � .. -�� '� �� . �► . �'►Q �i�0 * ��. • 5��. ,�� , ._v Ov!'j� ��V�'t�*,,,�' � �;, �'ii,l�� . � . , .�;"��-��r 4Q.,� V �!s�,�, p � _ . . �p„�-' �,��, �p ��, �� `�.��;,� ��+ � = � ! e� � i�� r �r ._ � t1 � 1� �ts w� • �,► � �� S. �- � . �� ,��M ,�� '��(r7 tJ��l Q;��] �� '�•yt� 'C�� 1 • • �� r1�� .�<��t..!] fJ� � : �i1�''~� �;��i� �t�� , . �� M � �� . � ` � • • L�l.�� J�� fJ� � _ �, �� ,��1 �� . , '0 � �*�o �r3 �'.�- � • ��i� �;��, . ,,,., . � �r� � �, �� '�_�'i1 L�lla�� OC�� t� t 1�■ a, � � ' � , , �� o � 20p4 Annexation Review Form �'r',��'",°sRs��N S [X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition t1��C�� Y TO : Building Surface Water Utility ��S��I' Fire � Parks Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM • Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Pla nir�'g � . � r SUBJECT . Lindberg Annexation, A-04-008 ; ��A f� � � `�`�� Location : The proposed 10.11-acre irregularly shaped Lindberg Arit�_xj�i1:l�.._.,.�,��.. � located south of NE 4"' Street abutting the current City boundary on its north and portions of its western and southern boundaries. Basically, it is north and east of the recently incorporated Carlo Annexation, earlier this year. It's western boundary would be Duvall Avenue NE and most of its southern boundary would be SE 133`� Street, if extended (see attached map and petition). Date Circulated: November 4. 2004 Comments Due: November 18. 2004 General Information Area : 9.72 acres Street length : 410 feet (existing) Assessed Value : $2,448,000 Estimated Population : 25 people Current Uses: Residential : 10 Dwelling Units Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation : Residential Future Uses: : +62 Dwelling Units Future Po ulation • 155 eo le Reviewing Department/Division: W aVe✓ ��u�1 ��i�nunl/ �l , 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? I�O �a. p��M w+ c� �e. �u�o&��( a n ru��o aH o+� �i n� ��5�- o� 146� A�� SE is (��k� #�¢� � u, �� u� jCenluh s u�la�Lr a�r��cR a,ieo� . 'I�' �rn� �nrh�,J -ea.�� o� �af�� S� u wi�u� I�Gt,.�D � aa uta✓e✓ ��u. G.,�ta— . � 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? ►�0 • 1�K�L�/µgi a 6 n��,0►.1 t�1i u., b� Ctk 4u,n C�U `t�o S�2 JV /��r�r�t-�� e*,.� p,-�',� • (Over) a � r� � , Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2 . 11/04/2004 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your department/division? `CG� , a��u�l� -� �bth o� .�Q�l� o� l do� hv� � � �;-� U 1zC u.c� � �G �� i� a,i� . ��n can� S1w�/� C�r►�aoL" Il�� qU �W Ula✓r� aJa��ab,G� Cer�E'i�ca�- �w � a�av�- (�c,rcfi�� LQ. Anns-oa.�'�d4! _ 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? C you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �.i o �(�� K c.�,.n.tt�ro r�1 c,��'I . �- US KC�Nlo�1�U �1cT��s F��S S)I A u Q 6 A; 't 1'� G��t.�P�s Cer�' 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? t�d . 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) IT ��c-a� -m M .�y��n.� �s a�► �s c,+�� c�-� r�-� -n�,� �-��,�� ciN �tu.� L-t�S �i n� OF 1 ho� �'t S� � General recommendation and comments: t1 , �i►'('� l�i k env um� c�Ar��- S�tt-�c6- � P�sYt-�o�.l a� ut�T ��- c.� I�to- �,r�S�. _ �,r� u(�D � RD Ft�►�✓ ur-n-�c�►�- S�►,�►`c� +Fa�� P��+-� c,,.� �s�s �nc� c�- t4�� 'e� �' Signature: � Date: N� S i �U`� �� , �u�� . � . . �-o�-oo� �.i�}�'''` �_.�r" i>i_...�3€,P',,''� ;�;C-: :• �k �,�S; ,��. ;� - '-• ° E.t :.7 �.i i;:r NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE �:E-r;��'� -?; ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS -;-�v�: - - - ;� �f_1-r;� .. ._. ,-:�._ UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) 10% PETTTION— �-- ��+�/��-'-w'`� ANNEXATION TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF SUBMITTED BY: �� M ��'`'`' �'`e � r THE CITY OF RENTON ADDREss: 'P. c� , !3�x Z s t�� City Hall, c/o City Clerk �Z��, in/4 9�p5� 1055 South Grady Way PHONE: Z�„-��o •3�� Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) of the assessed value of property within the proposed annexation area which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A legal description (Exhibit A) and map (Exhibit B) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. 1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept, reject or geographically modify the�proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 + { . { WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) ,o�, / �,P,�e�- l��C� �� l.�l� -��5,� l. �� q.� t,i � /'� �l�- �l�c� 2. rD�2 �� /�3�.:�-�� !�/ — t/�1 F3Utt e� ��t� �,a.� � . �..� ,�� - ��s�' 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. lo. Page 2 of 2 H:\DIVISION.S\P&TS\PLANNINGWNNEX�10%Notice of Intent(rev's).doc\DE 04/19/04 • � f LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION SITE Tax ID Legal Description 152305-9207 STR 152305 TAXLOT 207 W 149.29 FT OF E 479.29 FT OF N 99FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 152305-9044 STR 152305 TAXLOT 44PP ACT 39923958 MOBILE HOME LOT 3 KCSP 676075 REC AF#7701190691 SD PLAT 152305-9206 STR152305 TAXLOT 206 PP ACT 39924055 MOBILE HOME LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 152305-9205 STR 152305 TAXLOT 205 LOT 2 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 8303160822 SD SHORT PLAT DAF 152305-9222 STR 152305 TAXLOT 222 PP ACT 39924071 MOBILE HOME LOT 3 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 152305-9223 STR 152305 TAXLOT 223 LOT 223 LOT 4 LESS RD OF KC SHORT PLAT#882065 RECORDING NO 830316-0822 SD SHORT 152305-9037 STR 152305 TAXLOT 37 S 99 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SD SEC LESS E 330 FT& LESS 152305-9082 STR 152305 TAXLOT 82 E 330 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS C/M RGTS 152305-9177 STR 152305 TAXLOT 177 N 99 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS E 479.29 FT LESS W 20 FT 152305-9048 LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 881050 RECORDING NO 8201220536 SD PLAT DAF-POR OF S 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF NE1/4LYNOFSE132NDSTLESSE30FT LESS W 30 FT � t ` M t� ''t� 1 l,�� i ��, j ;�_�._---�--� � � , u !I. e ♦ I 4 MI[YOIIONKK ► RIg L l f� y • � � � � �� i �\' �; I e T 2t � �+ . ■ � �t �� k �r ; `v <G,..n uc,,,•.`«. !f � t+ � �.... .... ...sa • ,, v. " __rn.�r�---'-- � ' �S . �.!�� • • . !MN. • � ' �� . _ �� —�MIWM .In/NM • � `�(.�� • t � . � . � c � I S� �..,»M.�. , , I � ' ��w" � � �� -�- ' z�' . + ,� � .v.,,, � t . � �`�,�`� � � 3� � , . � � � - � - �� . ,� � . . : ,; � � ,� , �'s ° � : " ` i�Q I r 0" '�,�r �.g, 1.� , * �' �t � r /i ,� r �, f + ��,_ y�• ��a rw � .2—. M _� r•. ` �� »7'� } I� I�� '� E � {� *� � �: .� . O�e ' I . ji F i � i�� s . � �� oN 1� _ I C r � �*+�_ �I � ` O� "...'�_. Oqy� � � ' 4� � s n � IZ 2 � � I � V � �iwiw . u M ( 1 I 1 I r � 1� � �� Y � 1\ � j� � . t � � � ` / � Y , �� '_ ��• ��, �t �,� ��; ... �.�` �3 � p`� �4 �� `p'� .�''� �i� •r•�� •«..ia w Si Ti . w!N " ^I NA � I..n.;, _ � ""' .i s la�tN N/E aE ,�t.rn.....�_i $ .e....i .t�.�v� i•t.r+> •v '—�-1 • • M/ • .M6 2 '�M�.�wM � � �` I=��Y Q� � ' i . I � `� o` � $ �-�'-� - � c�� .�� s �� Z I ` ""_ �' C � , ; yI,p�`�f � �� t@��.� C ' ' . ] � ; ilI �� I � � L'� �' 'M � ' Ij �'� ; _ �wV- ' � � . . � � � �6 ^ �Ea�► ��_ A N � � � � -_ s - � � $ � . � m � , � � � � f : f � O'{ �=; @�i ' '� w � •�� V1 -- -�°.... -� •------ •----- � e� .. � �' ''' ----�---_ �K«JN IIC 1M AVE sc :.,..,:»...iv«• • • T .� __._.._.. . ' :�:=-- ~��—�--t--=��—�— � `� 1 ��_ �i .a � t �R;:i--��`��__�� t�� + 6u� } "� ' ��---"^ r -- - ^.. �! �c "^�- .t J`. � - ��.� � ��z r � � ; �.t � ��J � , �L; �k �,� �\� ', ° � ' �ra_� ~ ? � „ GETk �4ti �� t► � 0 � I�� ' � Z � t � a ~ : a ^ � �°� �°�w..� " � � �:• ��y�� ! ��-�--------t-- 'G� .;� 0 ,,,,,; �'\ o •! s z�:..�-- � I � . 3 � 1 1 ! x1 a ., : �,� � �: �,� � � � t�'�. � 'V � ��' �� c � - - - i Z t f► _ � �� a �► ► '�i � � '�+�'.�, --� � � I : ! � s. a i = �+q k� .�; , p�*� � fo� I �a e• D � . __ ,�.. � � �_ 1.�'r�—._ T_�u_-__ �; � v�i "' — ��,�:�.�.s, - ` - .,.� �,.� _ �."_` ,- "•"" '' m.... III.I�• I� V ' • v � "„' �' '" -�!_ -n'�i":^.«:T— fn - � rt �i� �i�; �� . p s --� ,��- � � � � r = � • � , �� .�..— r"`_' , z g � , ��E ��'� �`# `� m� �� w > + � • � � �� E�i —..�— " ian : �, � --�-� �-0—.� n � � � �►�� a�: h�� •I ��Y �--:� � � _ �% •-- _ � �� t 5 �,� �i � . -'- �a.�x__ � I . 1`?1 y M � S 0� ¢ � t s . • �"" `•�0 ,•�,; « . 4 � ,.,. � �•�o �'� � �t �'�!�'� � � �� '�4. ;} ��.,�-=• t ...� ).,... : � � � �_._�. CNA..IYJ �qu.M 141TN AVE 3�__ � t � �swµ�..._µ•,�. �aMN.. -�7yN I��TN MV!fE +ti t ; ,x . a.w�^ si.srt.� M.M�.� t �� ' � . � •.aa,. .. �aw• • . w'�� . • � � � w ,� � � � ^ � �� r. � � i �� `'!.� �. t'_'� w.ar w��_e _ � � � t i.i.or { . � M f , � , � ' . ' '� i i £ F � ,....,,� ` +,'�..�g w,,,r;,,, � �,�� `► � � � ; i . �awr- � t � Ij,, �� , � � � I� . r ' ' ! ' � t � t�� `' •wJ_` •-,:�.t 1 � i .... � ,�t�, j , � • . � i � e i�fi� !. . . ! ! �. . � E � CtTr OF FFh'70ti ��EI VE� Annexation Review Form NOV p 4 2004 �IJI�DIN;, DIVISIQ�r [X) 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition TO : �Y �tfi� �: Surface Water Utility Fire Water Utility Parks Wastewater Utility Police Transportation Public Works Maintenance Current Planning FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning SUBJECT . Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 Location : The proposed 10.11-acre irregularly shaped Lindberg Annexation is located south of NE 4�' Street abutting the current City boundary on its north and portions of its western and southern boundaries. Basically, it is north and east of the recently incorporated Carlo Annexation, earlier this year. It's western boundary would be Duvall Avenue NE and most of its southern boundary would be SE 133`� Street, if extended (see attached map and petition). Date Circulated: November 4. 2004 Comments Due: November 18. 2004 General Information Area : 9.72 acres Street length : 410 feet (existing) Assessed Value : $2,448,000 Estimated Population : 25 people Current Uses: Residential : 10 Dwelling Units Commercial : N/A Industrial : N/A Public : N/A Comp Plan Designation : Residential Future Uses: : +62 Dwelling Units Future Po ulation • 155 eo le Reviewing Department/Division: (�(�f�-�.7fi�/v- 1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your departmenUdivision? �J 2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the area? /�U (Over) . � Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2 11/04/2004 3. Does this proposed annexation represent a Iogical extension of services provided by your department/division? �/`�K . 4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �n�� 5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? fJ�tV�'- 6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) iJ�'�' General recommendation and comments: � Signature: Date: �/ ` " �-o�_oog Cz3-y C.�?� �`_...3€;t;�� s-;; ;jC: ` ;� �3 �+;;,;a ti --' :t i> !.1::.:t NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE �,�._�.; _,,;-s —,� ANNEXA.TION PROCEEDINGS ;,�—;��'F��i.:.�:<:,;::.;�;-:. UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) 10% PETTTION— ��-- ��J��-✓�� ANNEXATION TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF SUBMTI'TED BY: �i M L�,`'`' R��e � � THE CITY OF RENTON �Dx�ss: P. � , !3�x Z s ��, City Hall, c/o City Clerk . �L Q„ �,-, fn/4 9�p5io 1055 South Grady Way PHONE: ��„-��o •�� Renton, WA 98055 The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) of the assessed value of property within the proposed annexation area which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A legal description (Exhibit A) and map (Exhibit B) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. 1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept,reject or geographically modify the�proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) lo�,/ �Qe� l��:3C� �� !�1�` -��,� 1. 7� 1�i4�t� �4� �.� r3 /t'ssM�eav �/� �1�3C2.S� 2. �0�z ``��`- /3�.�.s� l�� — �c�oa e� �',�.w,_ � . �-� �� -- Q�.�r 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Page 2 of 2 H:\DIVISION.S\P&TS�PLANNINGWNNDC�10%Notice of Intent(rev's).doc\DE 04I19/04 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION SITE Tax ID Legal Description 152305-9207 STR 152305 TAXLOT 207 W 149.29 FT OF E 47929 FT OF N 99FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 152305-9044 STR 152305 TAXLOT 44PP ACT 39923958 MOBILE HOME LOT 3 KCSP 676075 REC AF#7701190691 SD PLAT 152305-9206 STR152305 TAXLOT 206 PP ACT 39924055 MOBILE HOME LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 152305-9205 STR 152305 TAXLOT 205 LOT 2 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 8303160822 SD SHORT PLAT DAF 152305-9222 STR 152305 TAXLOT 222 PP ACT 39924071 MOBILE HOME LOT 3 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 882065 RECORDING NO 152305-9223 STR 152305 TAXLOT 223 LOT 223 LOT 4 LESS RD OF KC SHORT PLAT#882065 RECORDING NO 830316-0822 SD SHORT 152305-9037 STR 152305 TAXLOT 37 S 99 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SD SEC LESS E 330 FT& LESS 152305-9082 STR 152305 TAXLOT 82 E 330 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS C/M RGTS 152305-9177 STR 152305 TAXLOT 177 N 99 FT OF S 198 FT OF SE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS E 479.29 FT LESS W 20 FT 152305-9048 LOT 1 OF KC SHORT PLAT NO 881050 RECORDING NO 8201220536 SD PLAT DAF-POR OF S 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LY N OF SE 132ND ST LESS E 30 FT LESS W 30 FT , � � � � e �� . � � M�. '�+• ! �a,. � i;'�� '"w.i � w � V � � . �I ��....�sx � � . i @ � -�_ # . f' r � ; �,�. �4 ,•�� , � t . *� � k -�- � • � n •.`r�• a v'�11i ..r 1,�,�. � Y \ I j � i� � • � � � .! •�, Y � � „ � ! ! t . u eT:...� � � ��--t � . � '�� . �� `� t ' � , � � �. �ti�n w�r r•r a.nr.� � 1�„ ` � .. ". .� !r.• av rJK•w ��w �C' . %y} k as sn►Ma rr�� .w.v�. --�-M w. � t � `-"�a vn�i ► '_a.na ��,r�q.b -_� S `� r � 7 � .�..LG'Vf_,�� ~�� ;1� � I. 1� ��• '�� ' ��. ��' '+ •rK j I ♦ t �' • .__'r�.—��` �� .0 - s � �� ( � �tl " ' . � � ..x. v- i .--t� '°°`r § �,. �� ;��1 . �� L,._.J �, - . . e�A � �� , ��.�� ppe � von w _ ~ � r -'��, � ��! . �� °°L� �{� '�j'� , '�� . 4 . R 1t � •�j � + 2 w i a �� 'i� �� . O '� � �� ...... _.� �..�_ . ,w —�%►..�.i�".'s .....� �.» ..�..�. ..... �W �••— ��1�M � ��+11fM � �'W p11YI �s N YY MY 11Y�� FM1/YJ'3j'3qY VIAI � • � --�__' �.'__�F_ 'AT � �rr.� • Q � :�� i� i '�.� R _�.«$.'�� ' , " }t b t 1 :'s s i .� 1— --- � s.w^_� ' " �. ' `+ a� l'� � $ r �E ~1 1 o � '`8� � • I h` � �� , ` �:� a� q �.�� : 1 : �k v�• � �� , �. • �.� •.....�,� : � . a�i : � � - i .;; --•---}-----....�--- i� , � WoH 0 t i . Z 3 '� i{ � � �'1 •� � �• � �l � , , � �13J ~ � � ' � r � � �, t1' c; t 1► �� Y� , �� . .� '�� ,,� �� e �'" �� _ R : �� ta ~ � � ,� , � � ��J � �� o� :� � • -- —•--�_---�--�—�-----�---�� -�. .. � s! t r, ,....» ,_..» ... ------- ----------- W . _ — - . ... • . _ ,� _'r� .. JN�} .4N �'rti►r+�� -^-- -.r�r....�..,.. as�sin�*�i�� ---- ---- 'L • �9 �-----•�----•• * .._. � — �'< T • -- . � `n +* a 1 �� ffi• + '` � �� *�0 � _/ � � . c , k p k � � . f 3 � � I � � �� I � N � �.e , '��. � _ � •� ' ' � . ' � � ' �� ,,� � . � ~( —ti'� � ` `• �r �I � � (� � : �, ' �i�. � ��a� k i� � � � I Z �. - 3 - � .� y +� �,o : ��-- � � � � , � � � � , . M � � MM��M�+II► 7 IN• \► N `YI r �K��)� Ir•�)i t � '',t. M � ��3/MN w �r � ' �:Yir ' n �� '�� p �� ,`^ -j'�,00 � �� 'io '•� :� i� �'� ` p � � � � O! 1 � i �� I + � , � Y � �S }�`j I � � � � � Y�`a n �� « � � � � I ' + �I � , �, ' ~q� •11�='O � aj�� ; � , � 1 � 1 � � � a � i � �o � .. ' " `� 1 � «, '0 �� ; ; � � � � � ,�, i �, _.�1, � , h '�-�i'vw 4 ' .�.�'- �;, � '��7rw� '� �1 �� 1�_ 4,� � . ' � N YlI I � �.� .�40 � ' , �� f� .� � �+O� y } .i s� . f � � �� . S _ � � ' � .1� . � �` ��: � � - .� . , --�.-�- �o , � . . � � , � �� s s � � � � I • � t •�r.�aa• t �� ..�;- ,»,ti. • �--- ,.—,.r ' ' s� ----------,y�sa a .. „ �" ' l i� a ...+��.�' w..�> � � ' �� A � C t?� � !` • .. ...., � � , � `� ! i�1� � ��_ �r w�ww� � j, � ' ' f � � '_ Y y ,IS � �� ;! �� Y h 1t � ��w y /'/_ � � Tax ID Name&Address of Acreage Metro Scan Tax Assessed 152305-9207 Cheri L & Karl W Goeres 0.34 355,000 13116 138th Ave SE Renton WA, 98059 152305-9044 Phillip R Lindberg 0.52 125,000 13809 S E 131 st St Renton WA, 98059 152305-9206 Paul A Lindberg , 0.88 144,000 13832 SE 131st St Renton WA, 980.59 152305-9205 Paul A Lindberg 2.04 295,000 13836 SE 131st St , Renton WA, 98059 152305-9222 Beth Shewchuk 1.38 207,000 13844 SE 131st St Renton WA, 98059 ' 152305-9223 Timothy J Lindberg 0.85 212,000 13845 SE 131st St ' ' Renton WA, 98059 � 152305-9048 Ricardo Beltran . . • . 1.19 140,000 2108 Blaine SE Renton WA, 98055 152305-9037 Charles Hargraves 0.68 244,000 13820 SE 132nd St Renton WA, 98059 152305-9082 Fredrick L&Judy R Busch 1.5 407,000 13918 SE 132nd St Renton WA, 98059 152305-9177 Edward C &Cynthia Chaussee 0.34 235,000 13120 138th Ave SE Renton WA, 98059 Tota/Acreape 9.72 2,364,000 Total Acreqe Total Tax Assessed ;►, ,s CITY OF RENTON � Mayor — Kathy Keolker-Wheeler July 5,2005 State of Washington Boundary Review Board for King County Yesler Building, Suite 402 400 Yesler Way Seattle,WA 98104 Subject: NOTICE OF INTENTION TO EXPAND THE CITY OF RENTON CORPORATE LIMITS BY ANNEXATION Dear Board Members: As required by Chapter 36.93 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCV�, the City of Renton hereby gives notice of intention to annex territory hereafter referred to as the "Lindberg Annexation". This annexation is proposed under the direct petition method in accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 35A.14 of the RCW. The petition has been certified by the King County Departrnent of Assessments. This annexation would incorporate into the City of Renton approximately 9.72 acres of territory for the provision of urban services. On rune 16, 2005 the required articles and exhibits in accordance with the Board's suggested format and the$50.00 filing fee was transmitted to you. Should questions arise during the review of the information and e�chibits provided with this Notice of Intention to Annex,please contact Don Erickson, Senior Planner, at(425)430-6581. Please send notices and other communications regarding the proposed annexation to: Don Erickson,AICP; Senior Planner/Strategic Planning Deparhnent of Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, . ��%�� — fN��`��-�, Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Mayor _---- 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6500!FAX(425)430-6523 R E N T O N �This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer A H E A D O F T H E C U R V E �' � �.`�Y O ♦ � '- + � ��N�� ANNEXATION SUBMITTAL MATERIALS ��l�a'.�Is�t�ee��.Iit�ie�tt.��::�i��.�nc��.;�ii��atxi�n Included in � _a�+�ts are e��,: �., ��c��tµw�C'� . t�: �staff rror to st��i;� � 1��o st�bmittal � � � �� ' P t � materials .��ca��a�,�C�i�ie�ic,��:�i��i=�'��i��. . . . 1. Legal Description of proposed annexation site if available or legal Yes descriptions for all of the properties included. (City will provide legal description for annexation area prior to the first public meeting.) ❑No 2. A map of the proposed annexation site of a size that will allow it to fit on an yes 8 'h: by 11" sheet of paper. This map should identify all surrounding streets and clearly show where the annexation site abuts the City of Renton ❑No boundary. 3. A list of all properties in the proposed annexation area identified by street �es address or County Assessor's ten digit Property Identification Number(PID). ❑No 4. A list of all known residents residing in the area and their addresses as well as any businesses. �'�'es ❑No 5. The total estimated acreage of the proposed annexation area. es ❑No 6. The proposed annexation area's current County Comprehensive Plan land �s use and zoning designations. Q--� ❑No �-��( �,s�, �e s� ��-h� � 4- i 2 u K� �-s �- e� 7. The name and status of any known current major land use applications or decisions affectin the ro rt . ��S g P Pe Y �1�� ' ❑No 8. The name of the designated sewer service provider for the area. ��s �� .��o� ❑No 9. The name of the designated water service provider for the area. es �it °F �'Q��v� ❑N° 10.The name of the designated fire service provider(fire district)for the area. �� 'F-`�N� � �I e �� R� }� ZS ❑No 11. The name of the school district or districts the proposed annexation area is �'lYes located in. � . l�e�► � ❑No � ; ANNEXATION SUBMITTAL MATERIALS 6. The proposed annexation area's current County Comprehensive Plan land use and zoning designations. Zoning= R-8 and the Land use designation 4-12 units Per Acre. 7. The name and status of any known current major land use applications or decisions affecting the property. None 8. The name of the designated sewer service provider for the area. City of Renton 9. The name of the designated water service provider for the area. City of Renton 10. The name of the designated fire service provider(fire district) for the area. Renton Fire Department#25 11. The name of the school district or districts the proposed annexation area is located in. Renton School District