HomeMy WebLinkAboutCED Planning File I-o�i� i��n�� �'I�.�n����
�ti`�Y o� CITY OF RENTON
♦ � � ♦ Planning/BuildinglPublicWorks Department
�� �0,� Kathy Keolker,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
N
EFFECTNE DATE: March 15, 2007
SUBJECT: ADDRESS CHANGES AT THE PERKINS ANNEXATION
TO WHOM TT MAY CONCERN:
Please note the following address changes made necessary by the Perkins Annexation:
OLD ADDRESS NEW ADDRESS PARCEL NITMBER
9636 132ND AVE SE 2616 IINION AVE NE 0323059156
9623 132ND AVE SE 2623 iJNION AVE NE 0423059114
9639 132ND AVE SE 2611 ITNION AVE NE 0423059142
Sin rely,
Jan Conklin
Development Services Representative
Development Services Deparhnent
Telephone: (425)430-7276 '
1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 R E N T O N
�_, _ AHEAD OF THE CURVA;
�, SE
th W SE 95t
� >
_ � s�
th PI � 9s
� �
�
r-
-- --- - ---- --�-- ----- -- -��o �t
- -
oyy �z- - -- - - -- --
St z � ���
�__,�i�
>
� t
: �
.o �
t � o
�
� r �
�
nd
�
�
nd
--F--�
l
�
�� �
�
�
�
Proposed Perkins Annexation o 40o goo
Vicinity Map
Ut'�Y Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning 1 : 40��
♦ � � Alex Pietsch,Administrator Annexation Area
■� C.E.Feasel ��� City Limits
��NT� �4 Febtuary 2007
. �
King County
Metropolitan King County Council
Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council
King County Courthouse
516 Third Avenue,Room W1039
Seattle, WA 98104-3272
206-296-1020
Fax 206-205-8165
anne.noris@ metrokc.gov
TTY/TDD 206-296-1024
March 13, 2007
Harry Sanders
Records & Elections Division
King County Department of Information & Administrative Services
500 Fourth Avenue, Room 553
Seattle, WA 98104
RE: City of Renton—Perkins Annexation
(BRB File No. 2241)
Dear Harry:
This annexation was approved by the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King
County on December 14, 2006. On March 5, 2007, the city of Renton adopted Ordinance
5261, officially annexing the property. I received a copy of this ordinance on March 12,
2007, and have enclosed a copy for your review.
This action has been finalized and is now a matter of public record. If you have any
questions, please call me at (206) 296-0364.
Sincerely,
Anne Noris
Clerk of the Council
AN:mp
Attachments: Distribution List
Ordinance
BRB Closing Letter
.�„�.�
Harry Sanders
Page 2
cc: Lenora Blauman, Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Sue Gordon, Communications Section, KC Department of Public Safety
Dr. Ngozi Oleru, Environmental Health Division, KC Department of Public Health
Lee Ann Merrill, Water and Land Resources Division, KC Department of Natural Resources
Debra Clarke, Accounting Division, KC Department of Assessments
Ken Guy,Treasury Manager, Executive Services
Tony Cooper, GIS Section, KC Department of Development and Environmental Services
Elissa Benson, Annexation Section, KCEO, Office of Management and Budget
Bernard Thompson, Construction and Facility Management, Property Services
Rey Sugui, KC Department of Transportation, Roads
Delite Morris, KC Department of Transportation, Roads
Nicole Keller, KC Department of Transportation, Roads
Brandy Rettig,KC Department of Transportation, Roads
Eric Dightman,KC Department of Transportation, Roads
Dan Stage, KC Department of Transportation, Road Services
John Miller, KC Finance, MS ADM-ES-0653
Mary Coltrane,DOT,KSC-TR-0313
Marilyn Cope, Council Staff
Monica Clarke, Council Staff
Sharon Claussen, KC Parks
Feliza Azpirtarte,Public Health
Jeff Gregg, KCDOT
Chris Haugen, Budget
Environmental Review—NW Regional Office
Washington Surveying and Rating Bureau
Puget Sound Energy
Chicago Title Insurance Co.
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.
Evergreen Title Insurance Co.
Data Trace
Old Republic Title Insurance Co.
Transnation Title Insurance Co.
Western Title Insurance Co.
Kroll Map Company, Inc.
Thomas Brothers Maps
This routing list was last updated on May 9, 2006
Ijyou wish to have your name removed,please contact Angel Allende at(206)296-0302.
. ���
. �ti`�Y o� CITY OF RENTON
� � + City Clerk
� ,,� Kathy Keolker,Mayor Bonnie I.Walton
�NT4
March 9, 2007
£^
,,�
.�_ •:, _ -
� � -
.�� , .
King County Council ,
Attn_ Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council " X- '� "
516 Third Avenue, Room 1025 . -�
Seattle, WA 98104 " - ""
Re: City of Renton Ordinance No. 5261
Perkins Annexation, File No. A-OS-006
Dear Ms. Noris:
Enclosed are two certified copies of the above referenced ordinance adopted by the
Renton City Council on March 5, 2007, finalizing the Perkins annexation.
Please feel free to call if additional information is needed.
Sincerely,
�k'�k4�yV1?.LG .4 Ll/G?���.d�"�
Bonnie I. Walton
City Clerk/Cab1e Manager
Enclosur�s
cc: Don Erickson, EDNSP Senior Planner
File A-OS-006
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98057-(425)430-6510/FAX(425)430-6516 R E N T O N
- AHFAD OF THE CUR\'E
�r�.-------'--�...... ... . . ........ .
' � � t , �_ ;1 ; ;-, �-
CITY OF RENTON, W ASHINGTON � '`— � -- � "
�.rn7 r - _ � •-}.4 t' t r
ORDINANCE NO. 5 2 61 -'�-�' ,� . , .,:-, �i' ! .
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CTI'Y OF RENTON, WASHINGTOI�F� : .. >�� • =;C:'
ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF RENTON
(PERKINS ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-OS-006)
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 as amended, a petition in writing
requesting that certain territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed
to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about September 28,
2005; and
WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City
of Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such
proceedings as provided by law, as more particularly specified in RCW 35A.14.120, and upon
public hearing thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to
assume their fair share of the pre-existing outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as it
pertains to the territory petitioned to be annexed; and to accept that portion of the City's
Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the temtory including the applicable Zoning Code relating
thereto; and
WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments has examined and verified on
December 22, 2005,the signatures on the petition for annexation and determined that the
signatures represent at least si�y percent(60%)of the assessed value(excluding streets)of the
area to be annexed, as provided by law; and
WHEREAS,the Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning
Department of the City of Renton has considered and recommended the anneacing of said
CERTiFlCATE
property to the City of Renton; and l, the undersigned City Clerk of the
City of Renton,Washington,certify
that this is a true and correct copy of
b�D 5 z.(o i . Subscribed
an sealed this�da of �'_,,20_O�
1 City Clerk BoruLie I. Walt�
�
ORDINANCE NO. 5 2 61 '
WHEREAS,the City Council fixed February 19, 2007, as the time and place for public
hearing in the City Council Chambers, City Hal(, Rentoq Washington, upon the petition and
notice thereof having been given as provided by law-, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said notices, public hearings have been held at the time and
place specified in the notices, and the Council have considered all matters in connection with the
petition and further determined that a11 legat requirements and procedures of the law applicable
to the petition method for annexation have been met; and
WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board have deemed the "Notice of
Urtention"approved as of December 14, 2006; a.nd
WHEREAS,the City of Renton is concurrently zoning the a.nnexation site R-4, four
dwelling units per net acre,a.nd R-8, eight dwelling units per net acre;
NOW, THEREF�RE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SEG"TION L All requirements of the law in regard to the a.nnexation by petition
method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140 and 150, have been met. It is
further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and
territory described beiow is hereby agproved and granted;the following described property being
contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of Renton, and
such annexation shall be effective five days after publication of this Ordinance; and on and after
said date the property shall constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its
laws and ordinances then and therea.fter in force and effect;the property being described as
follows:
See Exhibit "A"attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein
2
` ORDINANCE NO. 5 2 61
[Said properiy, approximateIy 15.47 acres in area, is generally located along and
south of SE 95�' Place, if extended, a.nd mostly west of Union Avenue NE (132nd
Avenue SE)]
and the owners of the property within the annexation shall assume their fair share of the
outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as prescribed in RCW 35A_14.120 as it pertains
to the property, and the property shall be subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Code.
SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five days after its publication.
A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of
Washington, and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COLJNCIL this S t h day of Ma r c h , 2007_
_�a�t�'irt�u�.cr •1� �.�/CZ�.C�O�`-'
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPR�VED BY TI�MAYOR this S t h day of M a r c h , 2007_
���-
Kathy K olker, Mayor
App ed as to form_
����Jt�G�.,.-"s�--- ..
;J� � i`d`�'.
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney �, ..••� •••.,,. � �
"4 � �_r Y
DateofPublication_ 3/10/2007 (summary) , . • �� ; W �
, � +i ; �
� o -
ORD.1333:2/8/07:ma �,."•-. C�3 .�� ;'
4�
R
3
ORDINANCE 5261
Exhibit"A"
PERKINS ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
T'he north 491.24 feet of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 4,
Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in King County,Washington; EXCEPT that
portion of the east 30 feet thereof lying southerly of the existing City Limits of Renton, as
annexed by Ordinance No. 4195;
TOGETHER WTI'H that portion of the west 30 feet(132"d Ave SE)of the northwest
quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 3,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., in
King County, Washington lying northerly of the existing City Limits of Renton, as
annexed by Ordinance No:�4195; and TOGETI-�ER WITH the sot�th 120 feet of the north
384 feet of the east 181.5 feet of the west 211.5 feet of said northwest quarter of the
northwest quarter.
ORDINANCE 5261
.
� `
`;. ,
� ,
-- --_--��� -
_ `_. ,_�,1
th W SE 95t ��� -
�, SE ��==—;
U, � �
- Q --- s �
--� - �9
th PI � _) S�
� ----- _
, �
, �
^ e„_ �c..- _ .x�,�. '_t _
,�3 S=t}-3• _ $�� .
�--- ":2��- -f'.t� �':£�`,;'-�^. .'.. -.-. t•_. _ "'
�Ix _ .,�r ��&$- �:��-ha.fix. 2� '
��� -�: �' _ 3-+`-�' i� __
�.,y ' .<!-y�:..1"Ry,�Y� 3..:: _
t�,:�; ..�;4i''} y.::�'�"'� . — I
t' �`-,`�>�.Y� �'_'-��✓w�-- —
S l 'i! t� �:-4����-.r ' .�'. r.'=
`�.g"�F,4'`,}' .-.''1,.:.
�__: ,�
•,��,'��� -�"�. '
t-5
;S�y; -
—__—_ � __�—
� _
� �
�
O
.— � (
� i� __� O
�
� �
� r �
�
N nd � — -
�
- � . n�d - - -1_ �� %
�
� - L
1t �
�
� �
�
c�
0
Proposed Perkins Annexation o 40o soo
Zoning Map
� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning 1 : 4800
♦(i+�7�♦ Alex Pietsch,Administrntor Proposed R-4 Zoning
�fN�/ G.Del Rosario
NTO 18 January 2006 ��� (�'�y��pltS
+ �•. ��''��i
: �
- Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
Yesler Building, Room 402,400 Yesler Way,Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: (206)296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://www.metrokc.gov/annexations
-_; �
December 15, 2006 �-. �
. j �,i
CJ �
j � �i'J
City of Renton r� -" `'�
_,�-, ao r,,
Attn: Don Erikson, AICP, -E�� --
Senior Planner ``��'� � '�
1055 South Grady Way z �? � ' '
Renton, WA 98055 " p ~�
. �
RE: CLOSING LETTER FOR COMPLETED ACTION - File No. 2241 - City of Renton -
Perkins Annexation
Dear Mr. Erickson: �
We are writing to advise you that the Boundary Review Board has now completed the required
Evaluation, as specified in RCW 36.93, for the above-referenced proposed action filed with the
Board effective: October 27, 2006.
The Boundary Review Board also provided a 45-day pubtic review period October 27 -
December 14, 2006, as prescribed by RCW 36.93. The Board received no request for a public
hearing of this proposed action during the public review period.
The Boundary Review Board, therefore, hereby deems this proposed action approved effective:
December 14, 2006. Final approval of the proposed action is also subject to the following
actions, where applicable:
l. Sewer and Water District actions and some other actions are also subject to approval by the
Metropolitan King County Council. If the Council makes changes to the proposal, the Board
may then be required to hold a public hearing.
2. Filing with King County of franchise application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of
this Ietter.
3. Filing with King County of permit application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of this
letter.
4. Fulfillment of all other statutory requirements and/or procedures specified in your Notice of
Intention.
Page two continued, December 15, 2006
Form 13
5. Notification in writing of your intended effective date of annexation. This notification should
be provided as early as possible. Please send this information to Elissa Benson, Bank of
America Tower, King County Office of Management and Budget, 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite
3200, Seattle, Washington 98104, and
6. Filing with King County Council of: (1) one certified copy of final resolution or ordinance
accomplishing this proposed action; and (2) a copy of this letter. This document should be
filed with the Clerk of the Council (Attn: Anne Noris), King County Courthous�, Room
1025, Seattle, Washington 98104
If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact our office at 206-296-
6800.
Sincerely,
;t<<
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
cc: City of Renton, Attn: Marty Wine, Asst Chief of Administration
Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council
� Dave Wilson, Records and Elections Division
Debra Clark, Department of Assessment
Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services
King County "911" Program
Paul Reitenbach, Department of Developinent & Environrnei►tal Services
Elissa Benson, Office of Management and Budget
PERKINS ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET
Units Po ulation AV
Existin dev. 3 7 $828,000
Full dev. 50 115 $27,500,000
Assumptions: 2.2 persons/household
$255,450 AV/existing unit
$550,000 AV/new unit
Rev�riues::'::::::::':' Total revenues
Existin Full Rate Existing;:;; ;;:::::$3;�3gi::�6:
Re ular lev $2,600 $86,350 3.14 Full :'::::;:::$1€�6;��:03:
Excess lev $65 $2,162 0.07861
State shared revenues
Rate er ca Existin Full
Li uor tax $3.52 $24.64 $404.80
Li uor Board rofits $5.04 $35.28 $579.60
Fuel tax- roads $14.46 $101.22 $1,662.90
Fuel tax-arterials $6.47 $45.29 $744.05
MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Cam er excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Criminal 'ustice $0.36 $2.52 $41.40
Total $208.95 $3,432.75
Miscellaneous revenues
Rate Existin Full
Real estate excise" $48.57 $339.99 $5,585.55
Utilit tax*'' $133.20 $399.60 $6,660.00
Fines &forfeits'` $17.53 $122.71 $2,015.95
Total $862.30 $14,261.50
* Per capita
'`* Per housing unit- based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate
�os#s:`:; :`:::::::::::' Total ongoing costs
Per ca ita Existin Full Existing ::'' '':;;;;�;f39::�8:
Contracted Services Full :::::::::';;$82,i3fi5':1(�i
Alcohol $0.19 $1.33 $21.85
Public Defender $4.68 $32.76 $538.20
Jail $8.56 $59.92 $984.40
Subtotal $94.01 $1,544.45
Court/le al/admin. $66.92 $468.44 $7,695.80
Parks maintenance" $14.90 $104.30 $1,713.50
Police $276.89 $1,938.23 $31,842.35
Road maintenance*" N/A $0.00 $4,894
Fire"** $1.25 $1,035.00 $34,375.00
Total $3,639.98 $82,065.10
*See Sheet Parks FIA
"` See Sheet Roads FIA
*** Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact
Existing :: ''':'::::::$36:28
Full ;:::;:::::::$��4;1#0<93
�n�=tirrie;txi�tss::Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA): $22,394.50
Other one-time costs: $425.00
Total one-time costs: :::::: ::�2�a$19:�()
Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo
U.S.BANK OF WASHINGTON 19_50
REN70N B H t25o
�.�Y p CITY OF RENTON
U � ,�, "� ACCOUNTS PAYA�LE 041946 10/06/2006 253283 ********"*50.00
♦ � � 9055 S.GRADY WAY
,,t� RENTON,WA 98055
'r,�N2Q� Phone:(425}430-6918 VOID AFT'ER 6 MONTHS
Fax:(425)430-6855
PAY Fifty Dollars and No Cents
par STATE OF WASHINGTON BOUNDARY -�,.��„ (�_, ,��,�' �,
ro r►,e REVIEW BpARD FOR KING COUNTY ��� MAYOR
ORDER 400 YESLER WAY-STE 402
oF SEATTLE, WA 98104 �;,��_..>a
F1NA CE&1S ADMINIS'CRATOR
u'0 2 S 3 28 3ii' �: i C 5000 i0 5+: L 5 3 500698 3 LBn'
PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING
CITY OF RENTON,WA 98055 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK N0.253283
Perkins/FilingFe 10/05/2006 Perkins annexation filing fee 0.00 50.00
50.00
PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING
i CITY OF RENTON,WA 98055 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK N0.253283
Perkins/FilingFe 10/05/2006 Perkins annexation filing fee 0.00 50.00
� � `� � RECEIPT N° 5 6 3 0 4
� �� Dat O �—� ��
m Recerved From
� � �
y ��� g Addre s /-7., _ /� �
� � $ J �J V
U a a � p� S _
c o ¢ �c���'"" � , " V � `..
O � � �C � �� �
�._ ��� Cash F �
Y� � �o � � �_��' � ��
z O � Check Ref rence
U / Q
O ,/ `r
¢ � Other BY `'� Signature
50.00
-= Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
Yesler Buildirig, Room 402, 400 Yesler Way, Serrttle, WA 98104
Phone: (206)296-6800 • Fnx: (206)296-6803 • http://wzvw.metrokc.gov/arariexatiorts
,. _"._rv+x YicY'e�.'.....4,....m .- �. . ,
November 30, 2006 `
. y � , �
�.r <
����'���J
e
�
;.
„_.�,�,.�n . .,.,:.,��
City of Renton
Attn: Don Erickson, AICP
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING
File No. 2241 - City of Renton - Perkins Annexation
Dear Mr. Erickson:
We have received approval from King County engineering staff of the legal description for the
above-referenced Notice of Intention. The Notice of Intention is now considered complete and
has been officially filed effective October 27, 2006. Therefore, the end of the forty-five day
period allowed for invoking the Board's jurisdiction and requesting a public hearing is
December 14, 2006. You will be advised of any further changes in the status of the Notice
before the Board.
Please be aware that any future final ordinance or resolution on the proposed action must
incorporate the legal description approved by King County engineering staff, including any
revisions made in response to the engineering staff review.
Sincerely,
�
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
cc: Marty Wine, City of Renton, Assistant Chief of Administration
Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council
Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services
FORM 12
�
. � �
NOTICE OF INTENTION
PROPOSED PERKINS ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RENTON
I. BACKGROUND/MAPS
1. The description of and reason for seeking the proposed action:
The proposed action is to annex approximately 15.47 acres to the City of Renton.
Annexation is sought by the proponents to develop under City of Renton regulations and
processes and to receive Renton public services.
T'he annexation was initiated through the 60% Direct Petition method under RCW
35A.14.120— 150.
The proposed annexation area is primarily located in the northeast quarter of Section 4,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County west of 132"� Avenue SE and
south of SE 95�`Way, if extended
2. Copies of the Renton City Council minutes for actions taken relative to the proposed
annexation:
A. Exhibit A: Certified minutes of the November 21, 2005 public meeting of the
Renton City Council accepting the Perkins Annexation 10%Norice
of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition and
authorizing the circulation of a Direct Perition to Annex.
B. Exhibit B: Certified minutes of the June 5, 2006 public hearing of the Renton
City Council accepting the 60% Direct Petition to Annex and
declaring the City's intent to annex the area, subject to the actions
of the Boundary Review Board.
3. Exhibit C: Certification of Sufficiency for the 60% Direct Petition to annex made by the
King County Deparhnent of Assessments dated December 22,2005.
4. Exhibit D: Legal description of the proposed annexation boundaries.
5. Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.222,annexations are exempt from SEPA.
6. The following maps are enclosed:
A. Exhibit E: King County Assessor's maps (two sets) displaying the proposed
Perkins Annexation boundary.
B. Exhibit F: Vicinity maps displaying:
1) The proposed Perkins Annexation boundary.
2) The City of Renton existing corporate limits relative to the
proposed annexation area.
3) All major streets and other major physical features.
�
� •
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Perkins Annexation
10/OS/06
Page 2
4) The boundaries, including future service area boundaries, of all
cities or special service districts having jurisdiction in or near the
proposal.
NOTE: The City and County library service area boundaries are
coternunous with the City's corporate boundary.
5) King County Urban Growth Area and City of Renton Potential
Annexation Area boundaries established under the Growth
Management Act.
C. Exhibit G: A map of the current City of Renton corporate limits upon which
the proposed Perkins Annexation boundaries have been delineated.
D. Exhibit H: City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations.
II. FACTORS THE BOARD MUST CONSIDER
1. Overview
A. Population: The population of the proposed annexation area is estimated to be
about 106 persons at full build out based upon 2.3 persons per household and a total
of 46 households. The City of Renton population as of Apri12006 was 58,360.
B. Territorv: The proposed annexation area includes approximately 15.47 acres.
C. Population Densitv: The proposed population density of the Perkins Annexation
area is estimated to be about 6.92 persons per gross acre at build-out.
D. Assessed Valuation: The current assessed value of the properties proposed for
annexation is approximately$828,000.
2. Land Use
A. Existin : Existing uses include three single-family homes with an estimated
population of seven persons.
B. Proposed: Although no specific proposal has been submitted it is anticipated that
portions of the site will develop as new subdivisions or short plats under Renton's
proposed R-4 zoning. This zoning allows single-family residential development at
up to four(4)units per net acre.
3. Comprehensive Plans/Franchise(s)
A. Conformance with Coun, Countvwide Planning Policies adopted b�ng Countv:
'The proposed action is consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies in general,
and the following policies in particular:
LU-31 In collaboration with adjacent counties and cities and King County, and in
consultation with residential groups in affected areas, each city shall
designate a potential annexation area. Each potential annexation area
shall be specific to each city....
a {
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Perkins Annexation
10/OS/06
Page 3
LU-32 A city may annex territory only within its designated potential annexation
area. All cities shall phase annexations to coincide with the abiliry for the
city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services to areas to
be annexed.
The City of Renton has designated a Potential Annexation Area in the City's
Comprehensive Plan. (Exhibit H) Renton has the ability to provide a full range of
urban services to the area proposed for annexation and is the designated sewer
service provider for the East Renton Plateau.
LU-33 Undeveloped lands adjacent to that city should be annexed at the time
development is proposed to receive a full range of urban services.
New development is likely to proceed upon annexation into the City of Renton and
the availability of sewers. Sewer certificates have already been issued for new
housing developments to the west and south of the site and can easily be extended to
serve the subject annexation site when it develops.
FW-13.Cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to urban areas
either directly or by contract.
Renton is prepared to provide a full anay of local urban services to the area
including police, fire, local government, and an array of other community services.
The City of Renton is the designated purveyor of water and sewer,under agreement
with King County,for the entire annexation site.
B. King Countv Comprehensive Plan/Ordinances
1) King County Planning under the Growth Management Act.
The subject area is designated Urban - 4-12 du/ac in the King County
Comprehensive Plan and is identified as being within Renton's Potential
Annexation Area on the County's Potential Annexation Areas Map. King
County planning efforts under the Growth Management Act have included
ensuring that development in the Urban Growth Area occurs at urban
densities and with urban level services available. The City of Renton has
planned for urban densities for this area and can provide urban services
within its negotiated service areas should annexation occur.
2) The following adopted King County Comprehensive Plan policies
specifically support the proposed annexation:
Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.B, Directin� Growth to Cities
and Urban Areas
U-203 King County should encourage most population and employment
growth to locate in the contiguous Urban Growth Area in western
King County, especially in cities and their potential annexation
areas.
Annexation would allow development of the subject properties to occur
within the City of Renton with urban services such as sewer, police, fire,
libraries,local government,and parks and recreation.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Perkins Annexation
10/OS/06
Page 4
Chapter T�vo, Urban Land Use, Section II.C, Urban Growth Area
Ta�
U-208 King County shall provide adequate land capacity for residential,
commercial and industrial growth in the urban unincorporated
area. This land capacity shall include both redevelopment
opportunities as well as opportunities for development on vacant
lands.
R-4 zoning on the subject properties would result in a capacity less than the
base capacity represented by the County's R-4 zoning, assuming the later
was bonused up to its maximum of six units per gross acre. Renton
calculates density based upon net acreage and the County's calculates
density based upon gross acreage. At six units per gross acre the subject
site could theoretically support 92 units, whereas under Renton's R-4
zoning it could only support a maximum of approximately 53 units.
Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section III.A, Plannin� with Kin�
Countv's Cities for Future Annexation
U-301 King County should work with cities to focus countywide growth
within their boundaries and should support annexations within the
Urban Growth Area when consistent with the King County
Comprehensive Plan and Countywide Planning Policies.
U-304 King County should support annexation proposals when:
a. The proposal is consistent with the King County
Comprehensive Plan;
b. The proposed area is wholly within the Urban Growth Area
and within the city's designated Potential Annexation Area
(for annexations);
c. The city is planning for urban densities and efficient land
use patterns consistent with the Countywide Planning
Policies and King County land use plans;and,
d. Adopted Countywide goals and policies for urban services,
environmental and cultural resource protection will be
supported.
The proposal is generally consistent with the King County Comprehensive
Plan and Land Use Map. The area proposed for annexation is wholly
within the Urban Growth Area and within Renton's Potential Annexation
Area.. The City's Comprehensive Plan policies and development
regulations support countywide goals and policies for urban densities,urban
services and environmental and cultural resource protection. The City's
proposed R-4 zoning is urban, medium lot zoning, which will achieve
minimum urban densities and provide efficiencies consistent with adopted
countywide goals and policies for urban services.
3) Adopted Kin� Countv Comp Plan desi�nation: The adopted King County
Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the proposed annexation area is
. �
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Perkins Annexation
10/OS/06
Page 5
Urban Residential - 4-12 du/ac. This designation is implemented with the R-4
zone,which bonuses up to six units per gross acre,on the subject site. As noted
above, the County's zoning, using TDRs and/or other bonuses, would allow up
to 92 units compared to approximately 46 units under Renton's R-4 zoning.
4) Comparison of City and County regulations for sensitive areas, etc.: With
annexation, King County ordinances and regulations would be supplanted with
those of the City of Renton. City of Renton ordinances and regulations
applicable to the proposed action include the following:
a. Regulations for the protection of sensitive areas: The City of Renton's
Critical Areas Ordinance (RMC 4-3-050) describes permitted and
prohibited activities and uses, waivers,modifications and variances,and
additional criteria and permit processes for development in critical
areas. Critical areas regulated by the Ordinance include aquifer
recharge areas, flood and geologic hazard areas, native habitat and
wetlands. Although specific regulations vary, Chapter 21A.24,
Environmentally Sensitive Areas, of the King County Code, provides
comparable regulatory protection of sensitive areas. The City of Renton
Critical Areas Ordinance is available upon request.
b. Regulations for the preservation of a�ricultural or other resource lands:
Regularions preserving agricultural uses are not applicable to the
subject area, as the proposed annexation area is not within any of the
agricultural districts identified for first, second, or third priority for the
purchase of development rights. Further, the property is not designated
for agricultural production or other resource lands in the King County
Comprehensive Plan and is not currently under agricultural use. The
City of Renton does not have a program authorizing transfer or
purchase of development rights.
c. Preservation of Landmarks or Landmark Districts: The City of Renton
has no regulations comparable to Chapter 20.62, Protection and
Preservation of Landmarks, Landmark Sites, and Districts, in the King
County Code.
d. Surface Water Control: The City of Renton has adopted the 1990 KinQ
Countv Surface Water Design Manual, by reference, in the City's
Drainage (Surface Water) Standards (RMC 4-6-030) as the design
standard for surface water control in development projects. Higher
standards such as those of the2005 Kin� Countv Surface Water Design
Manual, Level 2 standard, are often applied through environmental
and/or proj ect review.
C. Citv of Renton Comprehensive PlanlFranchise
1) City Planning Under the Crrowth Management Act
Renton City Council adopted the current Comprehensive Plan in 1995,
consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act. T'he 1995
Comprehensive Plan was updated in the 2004 Mandated Growth
Management Act Comprehensive Plan Review. The Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map identifies Potential Annexation Areas, including the area
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Perkins Annexarion
10/OS/06
Page 6
currently proposed for annexation, and shows land use designations for such
areas. (See Exhibit H, City of Renton Land Use Designations)
The proposal is consistent with the Land Use Element policies of the
Renton Comprehensive Plan that support annexation of lands:
• that are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area where the
availability of infrastructure and services allow for the development
of urban densities(Objective LU-1);
• that are vacant and subject to development pressure(LU-37.3);
• that are available for urbanization under county comprehensive
planning, zoning,and subdivision regulations(LU-37.5);
• for which the City of Renton should logically be the primary
provider of urban infrastructure and services(LU-36);
• that would include those who already use City services or who
impact City infrastructure(LU-41); and
• that includes environmentally sensitive areas and vacant land where
future development could adversely influence the environmental
and land use character of Renton(LU-42).
2) PAA status and PAA agreements with other cities, if anv: The City of
Renton has an adopted Potential Annexation Area. This area includes two
or three sub-areas, which are shown on Renton's Comprehensive Plan and
on the King County Interim Potential Annexation Area Map. The City has
also negotiated a PAA boundary agreement with the City of Kent. No PAA
agreement was necessary for the area currently proposed for annexation.
3) Required Comprehensive Plan amendments, if anv: No amendment to
Renton's Comprehensive Plan is necessary to process the current proposed
annexation.
4) Comprehensive Plan approval date: Renton's current Comprehensive Plan
was initially adopted on February 20, 1995, with annual amendments in
subsequent years. The latest, 2004 Mandated GMA Comprehensive Plan
Review was completed in November 2004.
5) Required franchises to serve area: No franchise will be required for the �
City of Renton to provide services to the subject area.
6) Pre-annexation Zoning A�reements: The subject area has not been the
subject of a pre-annexation zoning agreement.
7) Proposed land use desi ng ation: The subject area is designated Residential
Low Density (RLD) in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Upon annexation,
R-4 zoning is proposed to supplant the existing King County R-4 zoning,
consistent with the adopted RLD land use designation. Under Renton's
annexation process, zoning is adopted concurrent with the adoption of the
implementing annexation ordinance.
4. Planning data
, {
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Perkins Annexation
10/OS/06
Page 7
A. Revenues/Expenditures
This analysis identifies the General Fund revenues and costs associated with
annexing the subject properties as they are currently developed, as well as
estimating the annual fiscal impact of their full development at some undetermined
point in the future. "Full development" does not equate to the absolute zoned
capacity. Because Renton calculates density based upon net acreage the amount of
a site developable will depend on layout, and sensitive areas such as steep slopes
and/or wetlands. Also, when development actually occurs is dependent to a large
extent on market conditions. All assumptions regarding revenues and costs are
based on existing standards or other comparable data, but actual results are likely to
vary from these estimates. In general, costs associated with utilities have been
assumed to be supported by the rates charged for those services.
Assessed Valuations
Units Population(est.) Assessed Valuation
Existin conditions 3 7 $828,000
Full develo ment est. 46* 106 $20,178,000
*Assumes new home value of$450,000 per unit.
1) Estimated Citv Expenditures
City Services Current Full
Development Development
Contracted services $94 $1 437
Road Maintenance $0 $4 894
Fire Protection $1 035 $25 223
Police Protection $1 938 $29 627
Parks Maintenance $104 $1 594
Court,Legal and Other $468 $7 160
Stormwater Maintenance $194 $4 040
Total ongoing costs $3,833 573,975
2) Estimated Citv Revenues to be ag ined
Current Full
Revenue Source Development Development
Regular Property Tax Levy $2 600 $63 359
State-Shared Revenues $209 $3,194
Miscellaneous Revenues $g62 $13 200
Excess Le $65 $1 586
Total revenues $3,736 $81,339
3) Estimated Net Fiscal Impact
Net fiscal impact
Existing ($97)
Full $7,364
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Perkins Annexation
10/OS/06
Page 8
4) Estimated County revenues lost: The estimated reduction in County
revenues would be$1,968 at current development(road and library levies,
excluding library bonds) for Levy Code 4370.
5) Estimated reduction in County expenditures: The estimated reduction in
County expenditures is anticipated to be minimal, as only a minor amount
of improved King County roadway exists in the proposed annexation area.
6) Estimated fire district revenue lost: The area proposed for annexation lies
within Fire District No. 25. The City anticipates taking over this service
upon annexation and has a station (Station No. 12) approximately 3/a of a
mile away.
7) Estimated fire district expenditures reduced: The estimated savings to Fire
District No.25,because of this annexation, is minimal based upon service to
an estimated seven residents. T'he District contracts with the City of Renton
for fire services at a cost of$1.25 per capita.
B. Services
1) Water Service
The proposed annexation is within the City of Renton's water and sewer
service areas. These service areas would not change as a result of the
proposed annexation.
a) Direct/Contract: Future development will have to notify the City
regarding water availability and obtain a certificate of availability
prior to future development.
b) Stora�e locations/Capacitv: The zoned residential capacity under
the existing King County zoning is higher than the capacity under
the proposed City of Renton R-4 zoning. Since population growth
under the City of Renton's proposed R-4 zoning is approximately
50% less than allowed under the County's current R-4 zoning, the
District's capacity should be adequate for the water demand
generated by post-annexation development in the subject area.
Theoretically, the change in zoning that would occur upon
annexation of this small area would increase storage capacity.
c) Mains to serve the area: The City will require developers to extend
mains into the annexation area as part of their future development
proposals.
d) Financing of proposed service: Such extensions will be financed by
developers and normal user fees for existing and new residents.
2) Sanitarv 5ewer Service
a) Direct/Contract: Sewer service would be provided directly to the
proposed 15.47-acre annexation area by the City of Renton Sewer
Utilities Division.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Perkins Annexarion
10/OS/06
Page 9
b) Mains to service area: None of the annexation site is currently
being served by the City of Renton. There currently is an exisring
8-inch sewer line down the middle of 132°d Avenue SE (Union
Avenue NE). The City will most likely require developers to
extend sewer to those portions of the site they wish to develop.
c) Disposal: Sewage disposal will be through METRO's treatment
facilities.
d) Capacity Available: The City of Renton's sanitary sewer system
has sufficient capacity to accommodate full buildout of the
proposed annexation area, i.e. accommodate up to 43 new single-
family dwellings on sewer.
e) Financin�f proposed service: Improvements within this
annexation area would be anticipated to be made through developer
extensions or homeowner extensions in the future when residents
decide they want sewer hook-up. Residents on septic are not
required to hook-up to sewer if their system is working properly.
3) Fire Service
a) Direct/Contract: Fire District No. 25 currently provides fire service
to the subject site. The City of Renton provides this service to the
district under contract. Following annexation, the City would
directly provide prevention and suppression services to the subject
area.
b) Nearest stations: The annexation area is located within
approximately '/a miles of Fire Station #12, a new station, to its
southwest.
c) Response time: Response time to any point within the proposed
annexation boundaries could range from four to six minutes since
Fire Station#12 is very close to the subject site and will not change
because of this annexation. Staff does not anticipate any reduction
in the response time due to this annexation.
d) StaffinQ: Station#12 is fully manned, with five firefighters on duty
per shift.
e) Major e�uipment: Major equipment located at Station#12 includes
two 1,500 gallon per minute pumpers, one aid car, and a boat.
fl Certified EMTlD-Fib personnel: All shift personnel at Station #12
are certified EMT/D-Fib.
g) Fire Rating: Renton's fire rating is three, as determined by the
Washington State Survey and Rating Bureau.
h) Source of dispatch: Valley Communication 911 service is the
source of emergency vehicle/aid dispatch.
5. General
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County '
Proposed Perkins Annexation
10/OS/06
Page 10
A) Annexation agreements for extensions of service: No applicable annexation
agreements are in effect for the subject area.
B� TopoQraphv and natural boundaries: The site slopes to the north where the
topography drops nearly 82 feet to a plain above May Creek. The average slope
across the site exceeds 20%. Because very little of the site is considered steep
slopes(>40%) so most of it is considered developable under Renton's development
standards.
B) Projected 10-vear�rowth: The area is too small to make reasonable inferences from
large-area growth forecasts. The City projects about 43 new single-family units in
addition to the existing three dwellings on the site. This is based on existing
citywide R-4 densities and assumptions regarding identified physical and regulatory
constraints to development of the site and the probable market availability of land
for new development.
D) Municipal or community services: With annexation, the property owners and
residents would have access to a full range of urban services including police, fire,
parks, libraries, community services and classes, the senior center, the City's new
neighborhoods program, annual community events, and local, readily accessible,
government.
E) Potential delays in implementin� service deliverX: The area is currently
underserved in regards to park facilities according to the City's adopted level of
service standards. This shortfall is identified in the City's Parks, Trails and Open
Space Plan update. Staff estimates a one-time cost in excess of the parks/recreation
mitigation fees of$22,706 it would collect from new housing, as well as on-going
maintenance costs of$1,494 per year, as the prorated costs for new parks associated
with this annexation.
The current waste hauler would continue to provide solid waste removal for seven
years after annexation, according to State law. At that time, the area would then be
included in the contract with the City's waste hauler. With the exception of parks
and solid waste removal,no delays are expected in implementing service delivery to
the area. City departrnents reviewing the annexation proposal indicated that they
would be able to adequately serve existing and future development.
F) Evaluation of adequacv, costs, or rates of service to area: Existing services to the
area appear to be generally adequate. As development occurs in the proposed
annexation area, demand for services will, however, increase. It is assumed that the
cost of such services will be largely offset by increases in property taxes, services
charges, and other revenues based on population. If the City were to assume this
annexation at current levels of development, it would have to subsidize it for
approximately$96 per year. At full development, in an estimated 10 years,the City
would realize an annual surplus of an estimated$7,364 per year, in 2006 dollars.
King County and Fire District No. 25 are the only alternative service providers for
services that would be assumed by the City of Renton upon annexation. Fire
suppression services will change as a result of the proposed annexation since the
City will take over these services from Fire District No. 25. School district
boundaries will not change, as school district boundaries are not affected by
annexations. As a result, the subject area will remain within the Renton School
. ,
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Perkins Annexation
10/OS/06
Page 11
District. Residents will continue to receive water from the City of Renton. As
residents of the City, water rates will be reduced by over 30%. At the time they
hook-up for sewer,they will have to pay the rates established by the City of Renton.
III. OBJECTIVES
The proposed Perkins Annexation generally complies most of the objectives of the Boundary
Review Board. These include the following:
1) Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities.
No detrimental impacts to existing neighborhoods or communities are anticipated to result
from the proposed action. Established subdivisions located on the east side of 132"d
Avenue SE are not affected by this annexation.
2) Use of physical boundaries,including but not limited to bodies of water, highways and
land contours.
The proposed annexation follows the existing city limits on its eastern boundary. Because
schools cannot be included in an annexations assessed value for the purposes of passage,the
adjacent Sierra Heights Elementary School was not included in this annexation since its
assessed value would exceed that of the other included properties. The City of Renton will
likely invoke the Board's jurisdiction during its review asking that it include Sierra Heights
Elementary School in this annexation. Doing so would create a more regular city boundary.
3) Creation and preservation of logical service areas.
City staff that have reviewed the proposed annexation have stated that the proposed
boundaries appear to represent logical extensions for City of Renton services. Also,the
Countywide Planning Policies state that cities are the appropriate providers of local urban
services to Urban Areas. With the exception of sewer and water,Renton will be the
provider of these services. The proposal therefore furthers both the intent of the City's and
the County's planning policies.
4) Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries.
The proposed boundaries would create somewhat abnormal or irregular city boundary. As
noted above,this is because the Sierra Heights Elementary School was not included since
doing so would not have made this a viable proposal. It is anticipated that the boundaries of
this annexation may be adjusted,particularly if the Board's jurisdiction is invoked during its
mandatory 45-day review. The surrounding area to the north and west is also within
Renton's Potential Annexation Area and is anticipated to be annexed into the City in the
foreseeable future.
5) Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of
incorporation of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban
areas.
Not applicable.
� Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts.
Not applicable.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Perkins Annexarion
10/OS/06
Page 12
7) Adjustment of impractical boundaries.
This annexation is not being undertaken to adjust impractical city boundaries.
8) Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated
areas,which are urban in character.
King County has designated this area for urban development and it is located within
Renton's designated Potential Annexation Area.
9) Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term
productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the
county legislative authority.
Not applicable. No portions of the proposed annexation area are designated Rural or
designated for long term productive agricultural or resource use in the King County
Comprehensive Plan.
� ' EX�llblt C
�
King County
Department of Assessments Scott Noble
K"'g c°°°ty Act�""°'s�at'°"��ag. Assessor
S00 Fourth Avenue,Room 708
Seattle,WA 98104-2384
(20�296-5195 FAX(Z0�296-0595
Emait:assessor.lnfo@metrokc.gov
www.metrokc.gov/assessor/
ANNEXATIQN PETITION CERTIFICATIQN
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted December 20, 2005
to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson,
Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to
Renton of the properties described as the Perkuis Annexation, has
been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and
assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with
the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination,
found to be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of
Revised Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002.
The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature
on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual
signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an
appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to
be the case.
Dated this 22nd day of December, 2005
.�.�� �.-_
Scott Noble, King C ty Assessor
���
..�.«<o
� � . Exhibit A
- - RENTON CTTY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
November 21,2005 Council Chambers
Monday,7:00 p.m. M I N U T E S Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro Tem Terri Briere called the meeting of[he Renton City Council to
- order and.led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. --
ROLL CALL OF TERRI BRIERE,Mayor Pro Tem;MARCIE PALMER;DON PERSSON;
COUNCILMEMBERS RANDY CORMAN,Council President Pro Tem;TONI NELSON;DAN
CLAWSON;DENIS LAW.
CITY STAFF IN JAY COVINGTON,Chief Administrative Officer;LAWRENCE J.WARREN,
ATTENDANCE City Attomey;BONIVIE WALTON,City Clerk;GREGG ZIMMERMAN,
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator;KAREN MCFARLAND,
Engineering Specialist;JAN lI,LIAN,Engineering Specialist;ALEX
PIETSCH,Economic Development Administrator;ERIKA CONKLING,
Associate Planner;DON ERICKSON,Senior Planner;MIKE WEBBY,Human
Resources Administrator;MICI-�AEL BAII.EY,Finance and Information
Services Administrator;DENNIS CLILP,Community Services Administrator;
SYLVIA ALLEN,Recreation Director;LINDA HERZOG,Interim Assistant to
the CAO;COMMANDER KENT CiJRRY,Police De�artment.
SPECIAL PRESENTATION Recreaqon Director Sylvia Allen reviewed the programs and events the
Community Services:Summer Recreation Division offered during the summer. She noted the growing number
_.Recreation Program Report of participants,and described the many activities that tool�place for all ages,
� including sports programs,leisure classes,special populations programs,
various camps,aquatics pmgrams,trips,lunch programs,and cultural arts
� programs. Ms.Allen pointed out that the second year of operation of the award �
winning Henry Moses Aquatic Center drew 68,100 participants and earned a
, , ne[.income of$67,210. She concluded by expressing her-appreciation for the
opportunity to work for the City of Renton,and for the investments the City has
made to its parks and recrearion progruns.
Mayor Pro Tem Briere announced that this was Ms.Allen's final presentation
as she is leaving the City's employment. Ms.Briere presented Ms.Allen with a
• certificate of appreciation in recognidon of her contrrbutions to the City.
PU$LIC MEETiNG This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Annexation:Perkins,SE 95th accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Pro Tem Briere opened the public
Way& 128th Ave SE meeting to consider the 10%Notice of Intent petition for the proposed Perkins
Annexation; 15.1 acres,including the Union Ave.NE right-of-way,generally
located east of 128th Ave. SE(if extended),west of Union Ave.NE,north of
SE 98th St.(if extended),and south of SE 95th Way.
Don Erickson,Senior Planner,explained that three single-family dwellings
exist on this site,which slopes to the north and drops nearly 65 feet with a
slope of 13°,(0. He noted that downstream drainage conveyance issues exist that
will need to be rectified at the time of development. The esti�ated surface
water mitigation cost per year is$4,040. Reviewing the public services,Mr.
Erickson reported that Fire District#25,Renton sewer and water,and We
Renton School District serve the site.
� Mr.Erickson stated that current King County zoning for the site is R-4(fow
dwelling units per gross acre),and t�tia Re��on Comprehensive Plan desi ation
CERTIFIG�ATE
I,the undersigned City Clerk of the
City of Renton, Washington,ceRify
- that this�s a t����and-co�.�r�cir�py of
ll/21/05 Nhnutes . Subscribed
�a�Qt��n�s��ay o/f-�o�t.--,Zo�..
yE�-n�,r�,�' � l.(J�
�� City Clerk Bonnie I. Waltan
November 21,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 405
is Residential Low Density, for which R-4(four dwelling units per net acre)
zoning is proposed. F3e noted that since the site is wi�hm�QO feet of an e�isting
R-8 zone,clustered development is allowed. Mr. Erickson reviewed the fiscal
impact analysis, which revealed an estimated$11,403 surplus at full
development, assuming 43 new single-family homes with an average assessed
value of$450,000. The estimated one-time parks acquisition and development
cost is$15,213.
In conclusion,Mr. Erickson stated that the annexation proposal is generally
consistent with relevant City policies and Boundary Review Board criteria.
Public comment was invited.
Marion Vandermay, 9639 132nd Ave. SE,Renton, 98059,reported that she is
the major landowner in the subject area and a resident of more than 50 years.
She indicated that annexation to Renton is appropriate for this area.
Glenn Perkins,9623 132nd Ave. SE, Renton,98059, stated that he is the
initiator of the annexation. He spoke in favor of the annexation, saying that it is
much easier to develop and sell property in Renton.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON,
" ' SECONDED BY NELSON,'COi1NCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. '
CARRIED.
- • _ MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL ACCEPT THE
PERKINS 10%ANNEXATION PETITION,AND AUTHORIZE
CIRCULATION OF THE 60%DIRECT PETTTION TO ANNE��REQUIRING
THAT PROPERTY OWNERS ACCEPT ZONING CONSISTENT WITH TI�
� COMPREHENSIVE PI.AN AND ASSUME A PRO�'ORTIONAL SHARE OF
� � ' 'THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Comprehensive Plan: 2005 accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Pro Tem Briere opened the public
Amendments,R-1 &RC hearing to consider amendments to the R-1 (Residential-one dwelling unit per
Zones acre)and RC(Resource Conservation)zones,which are associated with
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2005-M-1,Low Density Residential Map
Revisions.
Erika Conkling,Associate Planner,explained that Comprehensive Plan Policy
LU-135 requires a review of low density implementation to ensure consistency
with Residential Low Density(RLD)objectives and policies. This includes
review of the zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations,development
standards,and allowed uses. RI.D-designated lands include lands zoned RC,R-
1, and R-4. Ms. Conkling pointed out that the development standards and land
uses are appropriate for the R-4 zone, and no changes are recommended.
Ms. Conkling stated that the R-1 zone provides suitable land for residential
development where pervasive sensitive azeas exist, without compromising the
� � - -� �- ��•� se�sitive areas: The zone provides for suburban estate and single-farriily
dwellings,provides urban sepazators between neighboring jurisdictions,and
prohibits incornpatible uses that may be detrimental to the residential or natural
environment. She conveyed that changes are not recommended foi the zone's
developanent standazds;however,changes in the land use are recommended that
limit activities of an urban size, scale, or intensity. THe changes include
prohibiting Adult Day Care II,Day Care Centers, Convalescent Centers,and
-Medical Institutions uses.
November 21,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 406
_ __ __ Continuing,Ms. Conkling reported that the RC zone provides some use of lands
' characterized by extensive critical areas, allows for agricultural uses,promotes
uses compatible with the functions and values of sensitive areas and reduces the
intensity of uses in accordance with the extent of the sensitive area. She
explained that changes are not recommended for the development standards.
Land use changes are recommended that limit or prohibit larger,more intensive
uses for maximum sensitive area protection. Additionally, medium intensity
uses will be allowed with additional review, and lower intensity uses will be
allowed. Ms. Conkling indicated that the same four changes are recommended
for the RC zone as in the R-1 zone,plus an additional six restrictions on other
uses are proposed.
Ms. Conkling stated that few private property owners will be adversely affected
by the tightening of the use regulations. She noted that the RC zone is more
that 75% in public ownership,and one-third of the lands in private ownership
are open spaces held in common by subdivision homeowners. The R-1 and R-C
zone changes only limit uses of an urban scale and intensity. By making these
changes,Ms. Conkling said the City will be more consistent with its
Comprehensive Plan, and the changes will promote and protect valuable
resources for citizens and businesses.
Ms. Conkling concluded that limiting uses of an urban size, scale, and intensity
in the R-1 and RC zones will better protect sensitive areas and better serve the
purposes of these zones.
Public comment was invited.
Richard Underwood,2314 NE 28th St., Renton, 98056, stated that the
recommended changes are adequate and fair. '
Correspondence was read from Bill H.Williamson,Attorney for Alicia Mena
(Member of MT Development,LLC),PO Box 99821, Seattle,98139,
withdrawing Ms.Mena's application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment
submitted by her predecessor in interest, Sabina Molina, and recommending
Council take no action to amend the Comprehensive Plan since it affects the
Mena parcels.
City Attorney Larry Warren stated that Ms. Mena's issue relates to the
annexation of this property and the rezoning that would occur if the property
. was annexed. He pointed out that the issue has nothing to do with the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Mr.Warren explained that the property is
included within a lazger area being considered for an amendment, and
Comprehensive Plan Amendments are part of the City's annual review of the
Comprehensive Plan.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON,
SECONDED BY PALMER,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED. (See page 413 for Planning and Development Committee Report.)
Vacation: Rosario Ave SE, This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Jacques,VAC-05-004 accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Pro Tem Briere opened the public
hearing to consider the petitian to vacate a portion of Rosario Ave.SE right-of-
way, approximately five feet in width and 133 feet in length,located north of
SE 2nd Pl. (Petitioner: James Jacques).
November 21,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 407
_ _ Karen McFarland,Engineering Specialist, explained t�at the�etitioner is in the
initial stages of designing a short plat, and if the vacation is approved, the right-
of-way will allow development of an additional lot. She noted that the vacation
area does not contain any City facilities.
Ms. McFarland reported that the vacation request was circulated to various City
departments and outside agencies for review and no objections were raised.
However,the Community Services Department indicated that vacating the
property may impact the King County Regional Trail System. Although King
County has not formally responded, she said King County desires an easement
so a future trail can be accommodated. Additionally, Comcast indicated that an
easement is needed for its facilities.
In conclusion,Ms. McFarland stated that staff recommends approval of the
request to vacate, subject to the petitioner providing satisfactory proof that
Comcast and King County have received the necessary easements.
Councilman Persson expressed concern regarding the lack of response from
King County, and indicated he does not want the process to be delayed as a
result. Ms. McFarland stated that staff is recommending that the petitioner
grant King County an easement for the area in order for the process to move
forward.
In response to Councilman Corman's inquiry,the applicant's representative Jim
" �I�anson, 17446 Mallard Cove Lane,Mt. Vernort;�98274,confirmed that the '
' vacation area is not paved.
Public comment was invited.
- Previous speaker Jim Hanson relayed that the applicant concurs with the staff
. . ,. • .. .,. .
recommendation.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON,
SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARIlVG.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL
APPROVE THE VACATION PETITION. CARRIED.
Development Services: This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Deferral of Street accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Pro Tem Briere opened the public
Improvements hearing to consider replacing the existing option for defenal of street
improvements by restrictive covenants for short plats, with a fee in lieu of
constructing street improvements.
Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator,reported
that City Code requires developments involving residential subdivisions to
install street improvements,which can include curbs,gutters, sidewalks,street
lights, and the extension of utilities. For short plats,the developer may request
deferral of some of the required improvements under certain circumstances.
Jan Illian,Engineering Specialist, indicated that two types of defenals currently
exist. The first allows a developer to temporarily defer street improvements by
submitting a security devise that is released when the improvements are
completed, and the second allows a developer of a short plat to defer street
improvements with a restrictive covenant. She stated that staff proposes
removing the existing option for deferral of street improvements by restrictive
covenant for short plats,and replacing it with a deferral of the street
November 21,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 408
improvement subject to a voluntary fee in lieu to the City of the estimated costs
for t-he deferred-street improvements. --- ---
Ms. lllian explained that the restrictive covenant commits the property owner to
not protest participation in a future Local Improvement District(LID) or City
capital improvement project to install the improvements. Even though the
restrictive covenant is recorded against the title of the property,property
owners may be surprised when they are required to pay for street
improvements. She reported that since this deferral option was adopted in
1995, over 100 restrictive covenants have been recorded. To date,no LIDs or
capital improvement projects have triggered the enforcement of the restrictive
covenants.
Continuing,Ms. Illian stated that the proposed option requires that a special
street fund be set up to receive the payments, and the funds will be used to
build sidewalks or other street frontage improvement projects throughout the
City. She pointed out that this option assures fairness for developers regarding
costs of City-required improvements, and provides the City with financial
means to build the improvements at a later date without having to require the
residents to make financial contributions to the project.
• Responding to Counciiman Clawson's inquiry as to what kind of improvement •
this type of deferral applies to,Mr. Zimmerman explained that the deferral is
used for infill development, is usually applied to short plats of four or fewer
lots, and is common in isolated places where contiguous street improvements
are lacking. A short plat's street frontage is often 100 to 120 feet,and if street
improvements are installed by the developer,the result may be an improved
strip of frontage length that is out of character with the rest of the
_, . , . . neighborhood. He�noted that the improvements may need to be torn out and
replaced in the future if a larger project is built.
In response to Councilman Law's inquiry,Mr. Zimmerman stated that larger
area improvements can take place through LIDs, which do not occur very often,
or through City capital improvement projects, which are more common. Even
though owners of property with the restrictive covenants are required to
financially participate in the project,they are still surprised when presented
with the bill. He indicated that this has caused controversy in other cities. Mr.
Zimmerman noted staffs preference for the proposed option, where the
developer voluntarily contributes a dollar amount equal to the cost of the
improvements, which will be placed in a special fund.
Noting that the developer will pass on the cost to the new homeowner,
Councilman Law commented that the homeowner will have already paid for a
future sidewalk that other nearby residents will not have to pay for. Mr.
Zimmerman agreed that is a concern; however,the fees will substantially add to
the City's expanded sidewalk program, and potentially result in improvements
reaching neighborhoods more quickly than by the current restrictive covenant
method.
In response to Councilman Persson's inquiry,Mr.Zimmerman confirmed that
property owners will not have to participate in a future LID or capital
improvement project if the improvements costs have already been paid. Mr.
Persson noted that the costs for future improvements will be paid in today's
dollar value.
I�lovember 21,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 409
• - --- Councilman Clawsorna�r�d-�uix�-xhe elimination of the-restrictive covenant _
deferral,and pointed out that the proposed deferral option may benefit a '
neighborhood, if not the individual lots, by improving a sidewalk near a school.
Public comment was invited.
Jim Hanson, 17446 Mallard Cove Lane,Mt. Vernon, 98274, expressed concem
that a property owner or developer will pay a fee for a sidewalk in front of the
property,and the fee will be used for a sidewalk elsewhere in the City. He
recommended that the City be reasonable in the charging of the fee for the
small projects,as a small project by itself can cost more than if it were part of a
larger project. Mr. Hanson also recommended that the criteria for qualifying
for the proposed deferral option be made less restrictive than it is now for the
restrictive covenant deferral.
James Jacques, 1216 N. 38th St.,Renton, 98056, questioned whether a
developer has the option of either deferring or installing the improvements.
Receiving an affirmative reply,Mr.Jacques indicated that he would most likely
install the improvements himself,rather than pay the fee. He noted,however,
that this option will continue to result in intermittent street improvements.
� Councilman Corman commented that as a practical matter,there may be fewer
deferrals; therefore,the standards need to be such so that the sidewalks will
ultimately link up correctly.
Julie Dalpay, 13033 SE 95th Way,Renton,98056, suggested that when a plat is
developed,the surrounding neighbors be asked if they want to continue the
street improvements beyond the plat, as the improvements enrich the
neighborhood and property values. .
� In response to Councilman Persson's inquiry,Mr.Jacques stated that he may be
able to install the improvements less expensively than the City can. Mr.
Persson suggested that the City price the improvements at the contractors'price.
Mayor Pro Tem Briere commented that it will be nice to have the internuttent
street improvements connected together in the future.
There being no further public comment,it was MOVED BY CLAWSON,
SECONDED BY CORMAN, COLTNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED. (See page 411 for Transportation Committee report.)
RECESS MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL RECESS
FOR FIVE MINLTTES. CARRIED. Time: 8:30 p.m
The meeting was reconvened at 8:35 p.m,;roll was called;all Councilmembers
present.
ADMIIVISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towazds goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted
included: � ..
� The Clam Lights display at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park begins on
December 2nd,and will run nightly through January lst.
� The Mayor hosted the second meeting of the Transit Center Solutions Work
Group on November 3rd. This collaborative effort focuses on Renton
Transit Center security and is made up of representatives from the Renton
November 21,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 410
________ _ ��hc,nl District,King County,ll�ietro Transit,awners_andlnanagersof __
' nearby businesses,interested citizens,and City staff. �
AUDIENCE COMMENT Renee Korsmo Engbaum, 5424 NE lOth St.,Renton,98059, stated that 185 feet
Citizen Comment:Engbaum- of her property along NE lOth St. fronts the Wedgewood Lane Division 3
Wedgewood Lane Division 3 Preliminary Plat. She indicated that she had submitted a letter to Council last
Preliminary Plat,NE lOth St, week expressing concerns regarding the development, and stated her hope that
PP-OS-086 the City and the developer will address her concerns at the beginning of the
project. Ms.Engbaum reported that both the City and developer have
responded, and a joint on-site walk through of the site will be scheduled.
MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL REFER
THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED.
Citizen Comment: Gilroy- Patrick Gilroy,LandTrust,Inc., 1560 140th Ave.NE, Suite 100, Bellevue,
Wedgewood Lane Division 3 98005, stated that he is the applicant and the developer of the Wedgewood Lane
Preliminary Plat,NE lOth St, Division 3 Preliminary Plat, which is listed on this evening's consent agenda.
PP-OS-086 He reported that he has been in contact with Ms.Engbaum and City staff,and is
working with staff to address her concerns and will schedule a meeting with
Ms. Engbaum in the near future.
_ Responding to Councilman Clawson's inquiry, Mr. Gilroy indicated that most
of Ms.Engbaum's concerns regard public utility improvements and drainage.
He noted that those concerns can be addressed through the permitting process.
CO�TSENT AGENDA � Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Appointment: Planning Mayor Keolker-Wheeler appointed Joshua Shearer, 519 Seneca Ave. NW,
Commission Renton, 98055,to the Planning Commission for a three-year term expiring
- �' 1/31/2008,and`reappointed Rosemary Quesenberry, 3609 SE 18th Ct.,Renton,
98058, to the Planning Commission for a three-year term expiring on
6/30/2007. Refer to Communit�Services Committee.
AJLS: Sister Cities Fund, Administrative,Judicial and Legal Services Department recommended approval
Renton Community of an agreement with the Renton Community Foundation to establish a special
Foundation purpose Renton Sister. Cities Fund within the foundation. Approval was also
sought for Renton to grant this fund the unexpended balance of the Sister City
program allocation in the 2005 Budget. Refer to Finance Committee.
Annexation:Lindberg, 138th Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Ave SE&SE 132nd St recommended a public hearing be set on 12/S/2005 to consider the proposed
Lindberg Annexation and R-8 zoning for 10.11 acres located east of 138th Ave.
SE and north of SE 132nd St. Council concur.
Utility: Sewer Moratorium in Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
East Renton Plateau PAA recommended a public hearing be set on 12/5/2005 to consider extending the
moratorium on sewer availabilities for new subdivisions in the East Renton
Plateau Potential Annexation Area. Council concur.
Budget: 2005 Year-End Finance and Information Services Department recoinmended approval of the
Amendments 2005 year-end budget amendment ordinance. Refer to Finance Committee.
Plat: Wedgewood Lane Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions,of the Wedgewood
Division 3,NE lOth St,PP-OS- Lane Division 3 Preliminary Plat;40-lot subdivision on 12.7 acres located at
086 5325 NE lOth St. Council concur.
November 21,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 411
--- Library: Catalog&-C�irc-ti��t�---L-ibrary Division recomme�ded appro�al af a co�t�act-in-th�-�mount of$43,267 _
Tracking System Software with Dynix,Inc.for the automaCed catalog and circulafion tracking system
Migration,Dynix software migration. Refer to Finance Committee.
MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
UNFIIVISHED BUSINESS Transportation(Aviation)Committee Chair Palmer presented a report
Transportation(Aviation) recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the
Committee amended City Code Section 4-9-060C, City of Renton Deferral of Plat
Development Services: Improvements. The amendments will eliminate the option of deferrals subject
Deferral of Street to recording of restrictive covenants and establish a new option of voluntary
Improvements payment of a fee in lieu for approved street improvement deferrals. This option
will only apply to short plats, and only for short plats that meet the criteria for
deferral of the construction of the required street improvements associated with
the short plat approval.
The Corrunittee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter
be prepared for first reading. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY
CORMAN,COUNCII.CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIF,D. .
Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending
Finance: Business License Fee concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve changes to the business
Reporting Period license fee reporting period as follows: 1)annual invoicing of small businesses
(less than 50 employees); 2)quarterly invoicing of large businesses (50 or more
employees);and 3)establishment of a schedule when small businesses will
receive and pay their annual business license fee. The Committee further
�a � �� • recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for reading.
MOVED BY PERSSON,SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 414 for ordinance.)
Committee of the Whole Council President Pro Tem Corman presented a Committee of the Whole report
Comprehensive Plan: 2005 recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to add the West Hill to
Amendments,Inclusion of the City of Renton Potential Annexation Area(2005 Comprehensive Plan
West Hill in PAA Amendment File 2005-M-3). The Committee further recommended
concurrence in the staff recommendation to amend the City of Renton
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to adopt land use designations and a
Potential Annexation Area boundary as shown on the map "Proposed Land Use
Designations for the West Hill PAA,"dated 11/14/2005. MOVED BY
CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR ITT THE
COMMTTTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Council: Committee on Council President-Elect Corman announced that the Committee on Comxnittees
Committees will be comprised of himself and Councilmembers Nelson and Law.
Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report recommending
WSDOT: I-405 to SR-169 Off- concurrence in the staff recommendation to grant the Washington State
Ramp Alignment Department of Transportation's request for approval of a concurrence letter for
the proposed alignment for the northbound I-405 to SR-169 off-ramp and future
widening of I-405. The Committee recommended that the Mayor and City
Clerk be authorized to sign the concurrence letter. MOVED BY CORMAN,
SECONDED BY PERSSON,CO,UNCII.CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
November 21,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 412
_ Utili�: Central Plateau __ __ _ Utilities Committ��Chair Corman presented a repozt_r�commending _ _ _________
'Interceptor Phase II,Roth Hill concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the engineering consultant
Engineering Partners contract with Roth Hill Engineering Partners,LLC for the design and
permitting of the Central Plateau Interceptor Phase II project in the amount of
$258,599,and the transfer of$400,000 from the Sunset Interceptor Phase II
project account to the Central Plateau Interceptor Phase II project account
within fund number 421, Sanitary Sewer Main Extensions. The Committee
further recommended that the Mayor and Cit.y Clerk be authorized to execute
the contract. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Release of Easement: Robert Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report regarding the request for
West,Lake WA Blvd N& partial release of easement by Robert West for property owners Steven
Wells Ave N,RE-OS-001 Altringer and Robin Shapland (for property located between Lake Washington
Blvd.N. and Wells Ave. N. at N. 37th St.). The Committee recommended
concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the partial release of a
certain City of Renton easement contained and described under King County
recording number 6660972.
The Committee also recommended concurrence with the recommendation that
• City Council collect the reyuisite processing fee from the applicant. No public
funds were spent in acquiring or maintaining that portion of the easement to be
partially released; therefore, this is a Class "B" easement and requires no
" further compensation other than the processing fee. City Code Seetion 9-1-4
defines this type of easement as follows:
"Class B: All City of Renton easements for which no public funds have been
expending in the acquisition,improvement or maintenance of same,or
� easements originally dedicated or otherwise conveyed to the City by the present
petitioner for the release of said easement for which no public expenditures
have been made in the acquisition, improvement or maintenance thereof."
The Committee further recommended that Council authorize the Mayor and
Cit, Clerk to execute the partial release of easement document and that the City
Clerk record the document with King County. MOVED BY CORMAN,
SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCII.CONCUR IN THE COMMTTTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
Utility: System Development Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report regarding the 2006
Charges,Annexation Fee System Development Charges and Annexation Fee. The Committee
recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve increases in
the water, wastewater,and surface water utilities System Development
Charges, and to establish an Annexation Fee. The Committee further
recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be prepared for first
reading. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COIJNCIL
CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
..C.ommunitv Serxices Cammunity Se,rvices Committee�hair Nelson presented a report
Cominittee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to grant the
WSDOT: I-405 to SR-169 Off- Washington State Department of Transportation's request for approval of a
Ramp Alignment concurrence letter for the proposed alignment for the northbound I-405 to SR-
169 off-ramp and future widening of I-405. The Committee recomm�ended that
the Mayor and Cit�}_Clerk be authorized to sign the concurrence letter.
MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PALMER,COUNCIL CONCUR IN
TI�COMMIT'TEE REPORT. CARRIED.
November 21,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 413
__ Plannin� �De�elonment ___ Planning and I?��elogment Committee Chai�Clawson presented a report
Committee recommending concunence in the staff recommeridation to approve the 2005
Comprehensive Plan: 2005 Comprehensive Plan Amendments as shown on the matrix entitled "2005
Amendments Comprehensive Plan Amendments," summarized as follows:
• 2005-M-1 —City of Renton applicant;Refinement of Residential Low
Density mapping within the Comprehensive Plan and Citywide zoning.
• 2005-M-2—City of Renton applicant; Add the Department of Natural
Resources/Shorelands property to Renton's Potential Annexation Area
(PAA)and to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
• 2005-M-3—City of Renton applicant; Add entire West Hill area to Renton's
PAA and to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map.
• 2005-M-4—City of Renton applicant;Review of Renton's PAA map
(pending).
• 2005-M-5—City of Renton applicant;Amendments to reflect changes made
by King County during its Comprehensive Plan update.
• 2005-M-6—Jim Hanson for OJ Harper and City of Renton applicants;
(denied). '
• 2005-M-7—City of Renton applicant;Redesignate Southport to Urban
Center-North.
• 2005-M-8—Sabina Molina applicant; analysis combined with 2005-M-1.
� 2005-M-9—City of Renton applicant;Redesignate WSDOT remnant
adjacent to_I-405 to Residential Low Density. .
• 2005-T-1 —City of Renton applicant; Update Comprehensive Plan
introduction.
• 2005-T-2—City of Renton applicant; Update and remove potentially
outdated private utility purveyor information.
� 2005-T-3—City of Renton applicant; Update names of agencies and
programs in Comprehensive Plan glossary.
� 2005-T-4—City of Renton applicant;Amend maps and language referring
to Commercial Business Districts for clarity.
� 2005-T-5—City of Renton applicant;Incorporate changes to the Renton
2005-2006 Business Plan.
The Committee recommended adoption of the ordinance approving the 2005
Comprehensive Plan update and the annual Citywide Zoning Map amendments.
The Committee further recommended adoption of the related ordinance
amending City Code Title IV Development Standards in the Resource
...... . Conservation and Residential 1 zones. MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED
BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN TI-�COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
Comprehensive Plan: 2606 Planning and Development Committee Chair Clawson presented a report
Amendments,Pre- regarding the pre-applications for the 2006 Comprehensive Plan review cycle.
Applications The Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to deny
pre-application request 2006-Pre-Q3 for a Comprehensive Plan map amendment
from Residential Low Density to Residential Single Family for the Perkins
November 21,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 414
property located at 9623 132nd Ave. SE based on the finding that the
� application is not timely since the Council changed this designation to the
current Residential Low Density during the 2004 Growth Management Act
update to reflect current policies, and the proposed redesignation does not meet
the findings in City Code Section 4-9-020G for further review.
The Committee further recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation
to approve the following pre-application requests:
• 2006-Pre-Ol —Chee Property, 1315 N. 30th St.; Residential Single Family
(R-8 zoning)to Commercial Neighborhood(CN zoning).
• 2006-Pre-02—Kinzer Property,Kennydale Blueberry Farm, 1733 NE 20th
St.; Residential Low Density(RC zoning)to Residential Single Family(R-
8 zoning).
� 2006-Pre-04—Springbrook Associates; Residential Medium Density(R-10
zoning)to Commercial Corridor(CO zoning).
These pre-application requests meet one or more of the findings in City Code
Section 4-9-020G. To meet the submittal requirements for further review of
these requests,these applicants aze directed to file complete applications for
Comprehensive Plan Amendments prior to the 12/15/2005 deadline. Upon
receipt of these applications, the issues will be referred to the Planning
Commission and the Planning and Development Committee for review and
recommendation during the 2006 Comprehensive Plan review cycle.
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
� THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
_� .� RESOLUTIONS AND The following ordinancE was presented for first reading and referred to the
ORDINANCES Council meeting of 11/28/2005 for second and final reading:
Budget: 2006 Property Tax An ordinance was read establishing the property tax levy for the yeaz 2006 for
Levy both general purposes and for voter approved bond issues. MOVED BY
CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCII.REFER THE
ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 11/28/2005.*
Councilman Persson encouraged Councilmembers to vote no on this item, as
there has been little if any discussion regarding whether to increase the tax
levy. Councilman Corman indicated that two more budget meetings are
scheduled prior to the second reading of the ordinance, and Mayor Pro Tem
Briere noted that the ordinance needs to be adopted by December lst.
*MOTION CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for first reading and advanced for
second and final reading:
Finance: Business License Fee An ordinance was read amending Chapters 5-5-2 and 5-5-3 of Chapter 5
Reporting Period (Business Licenses)of Title V(Finance and Business Regulations)of City
Code by revising the requirements for business licenses in the City,establishing
a short term business license,providing for renewals, and establishing
penalties. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL
ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING.
CARRIED.
November 21,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 415
- _--�Fdinance#5166 ---- Following second and�'uaalsEading of the above ordinanc�,it was MQVED BY
�inance: Business License Fee LAW,SECONDED BY P$RSSON,COLJNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE '
Reporting Period AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman Nelson reviewed the various announcements,events,and
School District: Activities activities of the Renton School District,including: student scholarship
recipients,Hazen High School's hosting of a Northwest minority pioneers
� exhibit, and Kennydale Elementary School's Family Fun Math Night.
EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY CORMAN,SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL RECESS 1NT0
AND ADJOURNMENT EXECUTNE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 MINU'TES TO
DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE
TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN
THE EXECUTNE SESSION IS ADJOLTRNED. CARRIED. Time: 9:13 p.m.
Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive
session and the Council meeting adjourned at 9:26 p.m.
,4. l,t/a.���
Bonnie I.Walton,CMC,City Clerk
Recorder: Miehele Neumann •
November 21,2005
. RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR
Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL C-OiVill�iIT3'EE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNE-Ii,MEETING
_ _ __ __ _ November 21, 2005 .
COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COLTNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP TLTES., 11/22 2006 Budget Deliberations
9:00 a.m. *Conferencing Center*
WED., 11/30 2006 Budget Deliberations
1:00 p.m. *Conferencing Center*
COMIVII'I�'EE OF THE WHOLE MON., 11/28 2006 Budget Deliberations
(Briere) 6:00 p.m.
COMMIINTfY SERVICES . MON., 11/28 Officially Recognized Neighborhood
(Nelson) 4:00 p.m. Standards;
Second Round of Neighborhood Grants;
Joshua Shearer Appointment to Planning
Commission
FINANCE MON., 11/28 Vouchers;
(Persson) 4:45 p.m. Issaquah School District Impact Fees;
Edlund Property House Lease
PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT
(Clawson)
PUBLIC SAFETY
(Law)
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATI01�
(Palmer)
iJTII.ITlES
(Corman)
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless oWerwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Councit
Conference Room unless otherwise noted.
� � " � Exhibit B
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
June 5,2006 Council Chambers
Monday,7:00 p.m. M I N U T E S Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro Tem Randy Corman called the meeting of the Renton City Council
� to order and led the Pledgc�of Allegiance to the flag. -
ROLL CALL OF Mayor Pro Tem RANDY CORMAN;DON PERSSON;MARCIE PALMER;
COUNCILMEMBERS TERRI BRIERE;DEMS LAW;DAN CLAWSON;TONI NELSON,Council
President Pro Tem.
CITY STAFF IN LINDA HERZOG,Interim Assistant to the CAO; LAWRENCE J.WARREN,
ATTENDANCE Ciry AttomEy;BONNIE WALTON,City Clerk;GREGG ZIlvIMERMAN,
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator;ALEX PIETSCH,Economic
Development Administrator;REBECCA LIND,Planning Manager;BEN
WOLTERS,Economic Development Director;MICHAEL BAILEY,Finance
and Information Services Administrator;DON ERICKSON,Senior Planner;
COMMANDER FLOYD ELDRIDGE,Police Department.
ADNIINISTRATIVE Linda Herzog,Interim Assistant to the CAO,reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
• programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2006 and beybnd. Items noted
included:
� The first"Catch a Special Thrill"Charity Bass Tournament was held June
3rd a�d 4th at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. The event was hosted
by the C.A.S.T.for Kids Foundation,and all procecds go toward providing
' a chance"�'or disabled artd disadvantaged children to go fishing for a day at '
events sponsored by the foundation.
PUSLIC H�A�2INGS •� Tt�is being the date set and proper nt�tices having been posted and published in ��
Annexarion:Hudson,Benson accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Pro Tem Corman opened the
Rd S&SE 168th St public hearing to consider the 60%Petition to Annex and future zoning for the
proposed Hudson Annexation; 14.6 acres(including streets)located in the
vicinity of SE 168th St.and Benson Rd.S.
Senior Planner pon Erickson stated that the site contains 19 single-family
homes, 152 multi-family units,and at least one vacant parcel. The western
portion of the site is relatively flat,and the eastern portion slopes towards Soos
Creek. He noted that staff recommends the use of King County's 2005 Surface
Water Design Manual standards,or greater,at the time of development. Mr.
Erickson indicated that the site is within Fire District#40, Soos Creek Water
and Sewer District,and the Renton School District.
Continuing,Mr.Erickson stated that the site is currently zoned R-8(eight
dwelling units per gross acre),R-12,and R-18 in King County. Renton's
Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Residential Single Family and
Residential Medium Density,for which R-8(eight dwelling units per net acre)
and R-10 zoning is proposed. He pointed out that staff will conduct a more
detailed analysis of the area's land use designations in the near future to reflect
some of the current uses. Mr.Erickson noted that the fiscal impact analysis
indicates a deficit of$52,349 at full development due to the area already being
significantly develope�;anc�:art e�timated one-time pazks acquisition and
development cost of$1�i8,l4S. CERTIFICATE
I, the undersigned City Clerk of the
Ciiy of Renton, Washington,certify
that this is a true and correct copy of
- - - _ 6/5/06 Minutes---Su�scribed ----
- and seale this 3=-�.ia�of-__Oct. ,20 06
� ��',S .�
City Clerk Ba�r1-ie I. Walton
June 5,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 179
Concluding,Mr. Erickson reported that the proposed�nnexation is generally
consistent with City policies and relevant Boundary Review Board objectives.
He indicated that surface water costs are estimated at$3,258 annually,and the
City will be responsible for the cost of a traffic signal and other improvements
at the intersection of 108th Ave. SE and SE 168th St.
Responding to Councilman Clawson's inquiries, Mr. Erickson stated that the
multi-family housing consists of garden apartments and fourplexes. He
explained that signers of the petition agree to future zoning consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan; however, that does not preclude the City from revising
the Comprehensive Plan to better reflect the character of the area. Mr.Erickson
confirmed that the apartments will become legal non-conforming uses,and that
the fiscal impact is a share of all of the City's costs.
Public comment was invited.
Mrs.Ralph Shafar, 1709 SE 29th St.,Renton, 98055, indicated her support for
the annexation as it will provide City boundary continuity.
Inez Petersen, 3306 Lake Washington Blvd.N.,#3,Renton, 98056,objected to
having to provide her personal infortnation,claiming that it violates RCW
, 42.30.040. Noting the Highlands area redevelopment zoning proposal,she .
cautioned citizens to beware of Comprehensive Plan amendments.
Kristen Harris, 10945 SE 168th St., Renton, 98058,stated that she was a
member of the Renton Chamber of Commerce board of directors,and is
impressed with how Renton conducts itself as a City and as a business. Ms.
Harris voiced her favor for the annexation, saying she supports the squaring off
of the boundaries, and Renton's quicker emergency response times.
. Additionally, she noted t;�at King County encourages annexation of
unincorporated areas to local governments.
Greg Boldt, 16801 l OSth Ave. SE,Renton, 98055, stated that he initially
supported the annexation, but now has concerns regarding the zoning. Poinring
out that R-8 zoning is proposed for his R-12-zoned property, he expressed
concern regarding what he can do with his properiy prior to the City's future
evaluation of the area's zoning,and concern that his property will initially lose
value.
Mr. Erickson noted the discrepancy between current King County zoning and
Renton zoning based upon its Comprehensive Plan. Planning Manager
Rebecca Lind stated that the City will be reviewing Comprehensive Plan policy
for the entire Soos Creek area. She indicated that any person can apply for a
Comprehensive Plan amendment.
Dr. Richard Quinn, 16655 108th Ave. SE, 98055, expressed concern about
traffic safety issues at SE 168th St.and Benson Rd. S., and encouraged the City
to pursue improvements and traffic signal installation at that intersection as
. soon as,possible. Dr. Quinn also expressed con�ern about water drainage ..
issues. Voicing his support for the annexation, he pointed out that Renton
responds faster to emerg�nGi�s than King County. In response to Dr. Quinn's
question regarding the zoning of r�eighborhood businesses, Ms. Lind stated that
they will become legal non-conforming.
In respanse to Councilman Cl�wson's inquiry, City Attorney Larry Warren
explained that State law does not require anyone to sign up or identify
themselves to attend a public meeting. He stated that Robert's Rules of Order
June 5,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 180
governs how meetings will be conducted, and it indicates that the body may
---- , -- adopt rules of conduct and decorum for its meetirrgs:-�t>ir.-�arren pointed out
that Council Policy#800-06,Rules of Debate,Decorum, Voting Requirements
and Procedures,requires speakers addressing the Council to state their name
and address for the record. Mr. Warren confirmed that citizens do not need to
provide a name and address as a precondition for attending the meeting.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY LAW,
SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL: ACCEPT THE
HUDSON 60%DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX; CONSIDER R-8 ZONING
FOR THOSE PORTIONS DESIGNATED RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY
AND R-10 ZONII�TG FOR THOSE PORTIONS DESIGNATED
RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY; AND AUTHORIZE THE
ADMINISTRATION TO SUBMIT THE NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE
TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD, IlWOKE JURISDICTION AT
THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR CONSIDERATION OF
EXPANDING THE ANNEXATION, AND PREPARE THE NECESSARY
ANNEXATION ORDINANCES. CARRIED.
Annexation:Perkins, SE 95th T'his being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
PI & 128th Ave SE accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Pro Tem Corman opened the
public hearing to consider the 60%Petition to Annex and R-4 zoning for the
proposed Perkins Annexation; 15.47 acres(including the abutting street right-
of-way)generally bounded by Union Ave. NE on the east, SE 95th Way,if
extended, on the north, SE 96th St., if extended,on the south, and 128th Ave.
. ,, ,> SE, if ext�,nded,on the west. ,
Senior Planner pon Erickson reported that three single-family dwellings exist
on the site, which slopes to the north with a 65-foot elevation change between
the northern and southern boundaries. 'The site is served by Fire District#25,
Renton water and sewer,and the Renton School District. Mr. Erickson relayed
that the Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends the use of
King County's 2005 Surface Water Design Manual standards at the time of
development, and notes that surface water mitigation costs are estimated at
$4,040 per year. The Parks Division notes a deficiency of developed
recreational opportunities in the area, and estimates a one-time park
development fee of$15,213.
Mr. Erickson explained that current King County zoning for the area is R-4
(four dwelling units per gross acre}, and Renton's Comprehensive Plan
designates the area as Residential Low Density, for which R-4 (four dwelling
units per net acre) zoning is probable. He noted that clustered development is
permitted. Mr. Erickson stated that the�scal impact analysis indicates a
surplus of$11,403 at full development.
In conclusion, Mr. Erickson reported that the annexation proposal is generally
consistent with City policies and Boundary Review Board(BRB)criteria. In
addition to acceptance of the petition and submittal of the annexation to the
BR.B, Mr. Erickson indicated that staff recommends invocation of the BRB's
jurisdiction to expand the annexation boundaries to the south to include Sierra
Heights Elementary School.
June 5,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 181
____ __ Ecpnomic Development Administrator Alex Pietsch suggested that the __
invocation of the BRB's jurisdiction not be limited to include only the school,
but allow expansion of the annexation area's boundaries generally. Council
discussion ensued regarding a general annexation boundary expansion,the
notification of affected parties, the BRB's public hearing process,and the
possibility of referring the topic of the boundary expansion to the Planning and
Development Committee.
Public comment was invited.
Inez Petersen,3306 Lake Washington Blvd. N.,#3, Renton, 98056,noted that
City policy does not outrank State law. She indicated that affected parties'
property taxes may increase as a result of being annexed, and that properties
may become legal non-conforming.
Dan McFarling, 9636 132nd Ave SW,Renton, 98056,pointed out that he owns
one of the three houses in the annexation area. He expressed his opposition to
the annexation,saying that he does not want to be a part of the City of Renton.
There being no further public comment,it was MOVED BY PERSSON,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCII,CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
. CARIZIED. - .
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCII,ACCEPT
THE PERKINS 60%DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX, AND AUTHORIZE
THE ADMIIVISTRATION TO SUBMIT THE NOTICE OF INTENT
PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD, INVOKE THE
BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD'S JURISDICTION TO CONSIDER
EXPANDING THIS ANNEXATION,AND PREPA.RE THE NECESSARY
w ~� � •w �� pRDII�AI�CES FOR POSSIBLE ANI'�fEXATION AND FTJTUKE R-4 �"" '
ZOMNG. CARRIED.
Utility: Sewer Moratorium in This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
East Renton Plateau PAA accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Pro Tem Corman opened the
public hearing to consider extending the moratorium on sewer availabilities for
new subdivisions within the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area
(PAA) for an additional six months. The current moratorium expires 6/5/2006.
Planning Manager Rebecca Lind explained that the moratorium was enacted in
June 2005 in response to a citizens group, Citizens'Alliance for a Responsible
Evendell(CARE). The rnoratorium prevents the issuance of sewer
availabilities that allow property owners to vest for development under King
County standards. She pointed out that CARE submitted its annexation petition
to the City in November 2005.
Ms. Lind stated that since the last moratorium extension in December 2005,the
Boundary Review Board(BRB) has scheduled the issue for a public hearing on
June 14th and 15th. She noted that�ve to six property owners have been in
_ _ ., � . informal discussions with sewer utility staff regarding sewer service �
applications.
Continuing,Ms. Lind explained that the boundary designated by the annexation
petition does not include the entire PAA. However, staff recommends that the
moratorium continue to cover the entire East Renton Plateau PAA because
some property owners outside the petition boundary may want to be added.
Additionally, the BR.B has the authority to modify the annexation area by five
percent of its proposed acreage, and there is no indication which areas may be
June 5,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 182
either included or excluded. Ms. Lind reviewed the differences between the
-- Rent�n and`I�ing-Cannry development standar�is for the area, noting that -- . -
Renton does not allow multi-family uses.
Ms. Lind reported that once the BRB makes its decision,King County will set
the annexation election date within 30 days. She noted that the earliest possible
election date is November 2006 or in early 2007. In conclusion, she stated that
staff recommends that Council extend the existing sewer moratorium for an
additional six months.
Councilman Persson said he sympathizes with developers who are willing to
develop to Renton standards,but cannot do so under King County regulations.
He suggested that Council send a letter to the King County Council in efforts to
resolve the development issues.
Economic Development Administrator Pietsch indicated that the
Administration has had extensive discussions with King County about the need
for an interlocal agreement that addresses these issues. He noted that even if
King County were willing to enter into an interlocal agreement, the agreement
process may take longer than this particular annexation process. However,Mr.
Pietsch pointed out that an interlocal agreement that covers Renton's entire
• PAA is needed; therefore,a letter•from Council would be helpful.
Public comment was invited.
Gwendolyn High,President of CARE, 13405 158th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059,
indicated that although CARE is doing everything it can to more forward with
the annexation, the process is at a standstill until the BRB holds its public
hearing. She encouraged the City to keep pursuing the interlocal agreement
� . � . with King Co,unty,poiqting out that CARE has also been worl�ing.on thjs
matter as a parallel effort. Ms. High urged Council to extend the moratorium.
Garrett Huffman, South King County Manager of the Master Builders
Association of King and Snohomish Counties, 335 116th Ave. SE, Bellevue,
98004, voiced his objection to the sewer moratorium extension. He emphasized
that affected parties ace frustrated with not being able to develop in the area,
and he recommended letting the moratorium lapse so they can move forward
with their projects.
Inez Petersen,3306 Lake Washington Blvd. N.,#3, Renton, 98056, objected to
having to provide her personal information. She pointed out that the City is
involved with too many projects,and recommended that the City pull back and
concentrate on just a few.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED. (See page 189 for resolution.)
AUDIENCE COMMENT Fred Crothamel, 2951 74th Ave. SE, Mercer Island, 98040, indicated that he
Citi�en Comment: Crothamel - submitted a letter regarding the Highlands area rerievelopment, which is listed
Highlands Area on the Council meering agenda under Correspondence. Mr. Crothamel stated
Redevelopment that he has initiated arrangements with a developer, and is waiting for the
rezoning to take place and the moratorium to end so that he can carry out the
City's vision for the Highlands area. He asked the City not to consider the use
of eminent domain.
June 5,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 183
_ Mayor Pro Tem Corman expressed his belief that the City intends to complete
the work on the rezone and lift the moratorium. He said at this point,the
Council has expressed that it probably is not going forward with eminent
domain.
Councilman Clawson countered that without eminent domain,property owners
would be in a position to charge whatever they want for right-of-way, for
example, if it were needed by the City or the State to expand a road. He noted
that the City has not yet decided whether it will acquire properties for
development,and stressed that the use of eminent domain is a last resort.
Citizen Comment: Petersen- Inez Petersen,3306 Lake Washington Blvd. N., #3,Renton,98056,expressed
Highlands Area concern regarding the City's potential use of eminent domain, saying that if a
Redevelopment declaration of blight is adopted for the Highlands area, eminent domain
becomes a tool. She emphasized that she not want that tool to be used.
Councilman Clawson pointed out that if not for eminent domain, I-405 and the
Seattle-Tacoma International Airport would not exist. He stressed that the City
has no intention of taking land for private use,which is prohibited by law. Mr.
Clawson indicated that the City is considering the assemblage of properties for
the purpose of preserving affordable housing and improving the housing stock
' in the Highlands area, which is a public purpose. He stated that property would
not be acquired without just compensation and without going through the
proper process. Mr. Clawson expressed his hope that the City would never
have to condemn anyone's property.
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
�,v -• Council Meeting Minutes�f Approval of Council meeting minutes of�/8/2006. CouriCil concur. ' �
5/8/2006
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 5/15/2006. Council concur.
5/15/2006
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 5/22/2006. Council concur.
5/22/2006
Appointment: Airport Mayor Keolker reappointed the following individuals to the Airport Advisory
Advisory Committee Committee: Kennydale neighborhood primary representative Marleen Mandt,
1408 N. 26th St.,Renton,98056(term expires 5/7/2009); Kennydale
neighborhood alternate representative Colleen Ann Deal, 1415 N. 35th St.,
Renton, 98056(term expires 5/7/2009); Highlands neighborhood primary
representative Michael O'Halloran,4420 SE 4th St.,Renton, 98059(term
expires 5/7/2007); Talbot Hill neighborhood primary representative Jennifer
Ann Rutkowski,515 S.47th St.,Renton, 98055 (term expires 5/7/2008);Talbot
Hill neighborhood alternate representative Beverly Freer, 1300 S.Puget Sound
Dr., Apt. 231,Renton, 98055 (term expires 5/7/2008); South Renton
. . . . ....,. neighborhood primary representative Robert�Moran,425 Wells-Ave. S.,
Renton,98055 (term expires 5/7/2008); West Hill neighborhood primary
representative Roger Lewis,415 Seneca Ave. SW, Renton, 98055 (term expires
5/7/2009); Renton Hill/Monterey Terrace neighborhood primary representative
Michael Schultz, 150 Monterey Dr.NE, Renton, 98056(term expires
5/7/2007); Airport Leaseholders primary representative Michael Rice,
Aerodyne LLC, 300 Airport Way, Suite 100, Renton, 98055 (term expires
5/7/2008); Airport Leaseholders alternate representative Kurt Boswell,
June 5,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 184
Bosair, LLC, 289 E. Perimeter Rd., Renton, 98055 (term expires 5/7/2008);
' -- . - 7Airport-at-Large primary representatives Greg� arn�--et�69-I;i�coln Pl.NE,
Renton, 98056(term expires 5/7/2009)and Diane Paholke, 325 Edmonds Ave.
SE, Renton, 98056(term expires 5/7/2007); Airport-at-Large alternate
representatives Michael Rogan, 2055 Killarney Way, Bellewe, 98004(term
expires 5/7/2009) and Kenneth Whitfield, 15125 SE 145th Pl.,Renton, 98059
(term expires 5/7/2007); The Boeing Company representative Jan Fedor, 1245
Sunrise Pl. SE, Issaquah, 98027 (term expires Sf7/2008); Aircraft Owners and
Pilots Association primary representative Jeffrey Davis, 10012 64th Ave. S.,
Seattle, 98176(term expires 5/7/2009); and Aircraft Owners and Pilots
Associarion alternate representative Karen Stemwell, PO Box 3365,Renton,
98056(term expires 5/7/2009). Council concur.
Vacation: N 38th St, Tasca, City Clerk submitted petition for street vacation for portion of N. 38th St.,
VAC-06-002 between Meadow Ave. N. and I-405; petitioner James G. Tasca, 14806 SE
Jones Pl.,Renton, 98058. Refer to Plannin�/Buildin�/Public Works
Administrator; set public hearing on 6/26/2006 to consider the petition. (See
page 189 for resolution setting public hearing.)
Lease: Engenio Information Community Services Department recommended approval of an amendment to
Technologies,200 Mill Bldg the lease with Engenio Information Technologies, Inc. for the 3rd floor of the
(3rd Floor), LAG-00-002 200 Mill Building to extend the lease for an additional year. Refer to Finance
Committee.
Streets: Hoquiam Ave NE Development Services Division recommended approval of the temporary
Temporary Closure closure of Hoquiam Ave. NE(NE 7th Pl. to NE 9th St.) for three to five days,
June 26 to June 30,2006, for Wedgewood Lane Division II plat-related
construcrion. Refer to Transportation(Aviation)Committee.
" Plat:Parkside,Blaine Ave NE, Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions, of the
FP-06-047 Parkside Final Plat; 15 single-family lots on 2.76 acres located at Blaine Ave.
NE and NE 24th St. Council concur. (See page 189 for resolution.)
EDNSP: 2006 Neighborhood Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Program Grants recommended approval to fund three projects and three newsletters totaling
$12,769 through its 2006 Neighborhood Grant Program,and approval to
conduct a second round of funding with a deadline of 9/29/2006. Refer to
Community Services Committee.
Comprehensive Plan: 2006 Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Deparrinent
Amendments submitted proposed 2006 Comprehensive Plan amendments. Refer to PlanninQ
and Development Committee and PlanningCommission.
Finance: Fiber Optic Finance and Information Services Department recommended approval of an
Installation Projects Interlocal interlocal agreement with eastside agencies regarding sharing of fiber optic
Agreement installation projects. Council concur. (See page 189 for resolution.)
Latecomer Agreement: PlanningBuilding/Public Works Department recommended approval for a one-
Penhallegon Associates, year extension(to 6/6/2007)of the preliminary approval for the Merrill
Merrill Gardens Q Renton Gardens @ Renton Center latecomer agreement request for a water main
Centre, LA-OS-001 extension along Williams Ave. S. Council concur.
Latecomer Agreement: Planning/BuildinglPublic Works Department recommended approval for a one-
Lakeridge Development, year extension(to 6/6/2007)of the preliminary approval for the Liberty Grove
Liberty Grove, LA-OS-002 latecomer agreement request for sanitary sewer installation at SE 136th St.and
160th Ave. SE. Council concur.
June 5,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 185
Lease: AirO Inc,Airport _ Transportation Systems Division recommended approval.of a lease with AirO,
Inc: for portion of the 790 building and 17 adjacent parking stalts at the Airport,
expiring 11/1/2013. Annual revenue is$25,116. Refer to Transportation
(Aviation)Committee.
Lease: Boeing,Airport, LAG- Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of Addendum#21 to
65-877 LAG-65-877,Airport lease with The Boeing Company, which completes the
leased area tumback,allows modification of the fire water system, and other
provisions. Refer to Transportation(Aviation)Committee.
CAG: 03-102, Sanitary Sewer Utility Systems Division recommended approvat of Addendum No. 3 to CAG-
Model/Inflow&Infiltration 03-102, contract with Roth Hill Engineering Parfiers, LLC, for additional work
Program,Roth Hill in the amount of$48,200 and time extension to 12/31/2006 for the sanitary
Engineering Partners sewer model development and inflow and infiltration program project. Council
concur.
MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
CORR�SPONDENCE A letter was read from Fred Crothamel(owner and manager of Highlands-area
Citizen Comment: Crothamel - properties),2951 74th Ave. SE,Mercer Island, 98040,stating that to prevent a
. Highlands Area determination of blight, he is prepared to tear down his duplexes and triplexes .
Redevelopment and replace them with properties acceptable to the City's vision for the
Highlands area. Councilmembers agreed to forward the letter to the Planning
and Development Committee.
Citizen Comment:City of A letter was read from City of Bothell Mayor Mark Lamb; Deputy Mayor
Bothell -Legislation Support Sandy Guinn; Councilmembers Patrick Ewing,Joshua Freed,Andrea Perry,Del
re Crime Enforcement Spivey, and Tim Tobin; and Police Chief Forrest Conover, 18305 101st Ave.
°� - - •� NE,Botheii; 9501 l, asking Renton to support`°legislation that maintains or
increases the level of narcotics enforcement, and enhances penalties for the
crime of identity theft. Councilmembers agreed to forward the letter to the
Administration.
Citizen Comment: Wesley- Councilwoman Palmer reported receipt of a letter from Mary Lou Wesley,
Airport History 10232 65th Ave. S., Seattle, 98178, requesting a written history of the Renton
Municipal Airport. Ms. Palmer indicated that the letter will be forwarded to
Renton Historical Museum staff.
LTNFINISHED BUSINESS Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending that
Finance Committee Council adopt the following recommended changes to the City's Investment
Finance: Financial Policies& Policy:
Investment Strategies
• Providing for the evaluation of the performance of the City's investments
using an appropriate index that reflects the profile of the City's portfolio as
specified by the Investment Committee provided for below.
• The creation of an Investment Committee to be made up of the Mayor,the
Chief Administrative Officer, the Finance and Information Services
Administrator, and the Finance Committee chair or designee. The
committee will meet quarterly to provide general review and direction of
the City's investments program.
• Authority for the Investment Committee to hire an investment advisor.
• Clarifies that the Investment Officer will make investment decisions
consistent with the direction of the Investment Committee.
• Eliminates a requirement that the portfolio conta.in a minimum of 30
percent U.S.Treasury instruments.
June 5,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 186
� Eliminates the requirement for the financial institution to participate in
- . -- -- local and State finance associations. —
• Eliminates quote requirements when placing funds with the Washington
State Local Government Investment Pool.
• Creates a qualification of dealers authorized to do business with the City of
Renton and provides that investment decisions will be made based on the
best alignment with the goals of the City's inveshnent program as defined
by the Investment Committee.
• Lengthens the maximum investment term from four years to ten and adds a
weighted average life limitation of 30 months(which can only be exceeded
by unanimous concurrence of the Investment Committee).
• Modifies the diversification limits of the portfolio.
• Provides for a limitation on Federal agency debt.
MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Budget: 2006,Appropriating Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending adoption
Funds for New Programs& of an ordinance amending and increasing the 2006 Budget in the total amount
Projects of$4,881,755 to appropriate funds for new programs and projects to meet the
� need of new circumstances and opportunities. The recommended amendments
are:
Changes to the proposed ordinance include:
1. Add$500,000 to the Police Department budget to resolve budget
challenges with the cost of housing prisoners. T'his will enable the
department to fill positions, including the previously authorized backfill
� � ' positii�ns, which were�eirig held open to help offsef j�il cost overruns.
2. Eliminate the requested transfer of$402,000 from Fund 316 to Fund 503,
as this matter was resolved with the carry forward budget amendment.
3. Eliminate the$637 adjustment requests in funds 403,405,406, and 407.
4. Adjust the amount of the Fund 220 year-end equity transfer to Fund 406
and budget authority to$67,826.
Resulting actions:
1. Approve funds for the Mayor's Office reorganization in the amount of
$85,000.
2. Approve additional funds for the Finance and Information Services and
Human Resources and Risk Management departments staf�ng needs by
$40,000 and$10,000 respectively.
3. Approve an increase in the City Clerk Division budget for increases in costs
for voter registration and elections as assessed by King County in the
amount of$40,950.
4. Decrease the appropriation for Human Services programs by$42,760 as a
- �• - � consequence of decreased State funding. �� --
5. Approve $140,000 for aerial photography and topographic mapping.
6. Appropriate$18,500 for the Fire Deparhment employee wellness program
as agreed to in labor agreements.
7. Appropriate$32,000 to complete the Pest Management and Control
program.
8. Increase the appropriation for professional services in the HoteUMotel
Fund by$22,500 as provided for in approved contracts.
June 5,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 187
9. Authorize the transfer of$67,826 from Local Improvement District Debt
, -- Service Fund 220 to Fund 405; a�ter LTtility. This repres�nts an
increase in the appropriation in Fund 220 of$35,801.
10. Approve$130,000 for completion of a Library Master Plan.
11. Increase the budget for construction of recreation center storage facilities
by$80,000 in order to construct a second storage building.
12. Approve an additional$80,000 for improvements to outdoor lighring at t:he
Henry Moses Aquatic Center.
13. Reduce the appropriation for inventories within the Water Utility Fund t�y
$25,000.
14. Authorize the transfer of$3,264,850 from Fund 421, Water Utility
Construction, to the Water Utility Fund, and increase the anticipated ending
fund balance in the Water Utility Fund as a correction to the 2005 Budge�t
amendment.
15. Appropriate$29,793 in Fund 407, Surface Water Utility,and authorize tile
transfer to Fund 427, Surface Water Construction,as a correction to the
2005 Budget amendment.
16. Appropriate$202,664 in Fund 451,Utility Bond Debt Service, and
authorize the transfer to Fund 426, Wastewater Utility.
17. Appropriate$20,000 in the Firemen's Pension Fund for the purpose of
paying for necessary medical expenses for qualifying retired firefighters.
Lastly,the Committee wanted to retain flexibility in the reserve fund balances,
within the General Government Funds totaling$2.6 million and the CIP Fund
(Fund 316)totaling$3.2 million,rather than designating them for specific
purposes. The Committee recommended that reserve fund balances remain
undesignated,but be available for City needs, including:
� Providing additional funds for the Parks Maintenance Facility.
• Providing additional funds for needs in the Highlands area.
• Grant match for park improvements such as the Sam Chastain Trail and ttie
Springbrook Trail extension.
• The potential need for additional funds to address the LEOFF 1 medical
liability.
The Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter
be presented for first reading.*
Councilman Persson explained that the Committee added the$500,000 to the
Police Department budget when it was discovered that the department was no1
filling police officer positions due to the deficit of what was owed for jail
funding.
*MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCII,CONCUR
IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.*
In response to Councilman Clawson's inquiry regarding Fund 503, Finance anci
" " °`Inforinatiori Sei-vices Administrator Michael Bailey stated ttiat if�is tKe
Information Services internal services fund. He explained that the City collecis
all the costs for technology systems in Fund 503, and then the costs are
allocated back across City departments.
*MOTION CARRIED. (See page 190 for ordinance.)
June 5,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 188
_ Transportation(Aviation) Transportation (.Aviation Committee Chair Palmer_presented a report
� Committee recommending concurrei�ce in the staff recommendation to execute Supplement �
CAG: 04-013, North Renton Agreement#6 with W&H Pacific,Inc. in the amount of$468,873.95 for
Infrastructure Improvements, additional design services and on-call services for design for the South Lake
W&H Pacific Washington Roadway Improvements Project. Until Fund 318 (South Lake
Washington Infrastructure Project Fund) is approved, including the bond for
The Landing project, the design project can continue to use Fund 317 current
unexpended 2006 appropriations. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY
BRIERE,COUNCII.CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Transportation: S 3rd St at Transportation(Aviation)Committee Chair Palmer presented a report
Shattuck Ave S, WSDOT recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve an
Grant interlocal agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation
and all subsequent WSDOT grant agreements necessary for a$200,000 Bicycle
and Pedestrian Safety grant for the S. 3rd St. at Shattuck Ave. S. project. The
Committee further recommended adoption of the resolution authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. MOVED BY PALMER,
SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 190 for resolution.)
Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Clawson presented a report regarding utility tax
Finance: Utility Tax rebates. The Committee recommended adoption of the ordinance creating a
Exemption utility tax relief program consisting of the following:
• Utility tax relief is granted to residents of the City who qualify with the
same qualification criteria used for the reduced utility rates program under
City Code 8-4-31.C.
� h � • The amount of relief-�o be granted is $110 per year prorated for the number
of months a qualifying citizen resides in the City of Renton.
• The amount of relief will be adjusted administratively by the cost of living
each year.
• T'he administrarion of the program shall be the responsibility of the Finance
and Information Services Department Administrator.
• Persons qualifying for the reduced utility rates program will be
automatically enrolled,while others may apply to enroll
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL CONCUR
IN THE.COMMITTEE REPORT. CAR.RIED. .
Responding to Councilman Clawson's request, Finance and Information
Services Department Administrator Bailey explained that the program will
allow the City to rebate back a standard amount of$110 per year of the utility
taxes that are typically passed on by utilities to the ratepayers. The utility tax is
a tax on the utility for the privilege of conducting business in the City. He
stated that this utility tax relief program is available for residents who qualify
for the utility rate discount program. Mr. Bailey indicated that qualified
residents will automatically be enrolled into the relief program,and pointed out
that the program is also available for those not paying the utilities directly.
Communitv Services Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report
Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the funding
Human Services: 2007/2008 criteria for the allocation of 2007/2008 Human Services funding, which
Funding Criteria for CDBG& currently comes from the General Fund and Community Development Block
General Funds Grants. This is a test and the process will be reviewed prior to the next funding
June 5,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 189
cycle. These updated funding criteria will more effectively allocate scarce
- -- - -'---- --- resources where they will do the most goo�t;and-vvii�-�antinue to best meet the
needs of the community.
The funding criteria are as follows:
1) What Renton result(s)does the program requesting funding for address?
2) Do the identified strategies address the desired Renton results?
3) Do the identified activities address the identified strategies?
4) How well does the agency:
a. Demonstrate they have organizational experience and structure?
b. Establish the program need and identify the target population?
c. Define the program,goals, and staffing?
d. Articulate a long-range plan?
e. Show financial stability by having diversified funding sources; a
complete,accurate budget; no serious fiscal issues; and serve a
reasonable number of people for the funding requested.*
Councilwoman Nelson stated that the Human Services Advisory Committee
will review human services funding applications based on the aforementionecl
funding criteria, which meet the recently identified needs of the Renton
community. �
*MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PALMER,COUNCIL CONCUR
IN THE COMMTTTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
RESOLIJTIONS AND T'he following resolutions were presented for reading and adoprion:
ORDINANCES
Resolution#3812 r A resolution was read establishing facts, extending a moratorium on sewer
Utility: Sewer Moratorium in availability for new subdivisions within the East Renton Plateau Potential
East Renton Plateau PAA Annexation Area, and establishing a termination date for the moratorium of
12/5/2006. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL
ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution#3813 A resolution was read setting a public hearing on 6/26/2006 to vacate a portio�i
Vacation: N 38th St,Tasca, of N. 38th St. between Meadow Ave. N. and I-405 (Petitioner James Tasca).
VAC-06-002 MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL ADOPT THE
RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolntion#3814 A resolution was read approving the Parkside Final Plat; approximately 2.76
Plat:Parkside,Blaine Ave NE, acres located in the vicinity of Blaine Ave. NE and NE 24th St. MOVED BY
FP-06-047 LAW, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL A.DOPT THE RESOLUTION
AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution#3815 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and Ci Clerk to enter into an
Finance: Fiber Optic interlocal agreement, entitled "Addendum#26 for Sharing of Fiber Optic
Installation Projects Interlocal Installation Projects," with the City of Bellewe,City of Kirkland,Lake
Agreement Washington School District, University of Washington, Bellevue School
� " District,and Evergreen Hospital, to provide an alternative to the King County[- �
Net and to better serve additional areas within the City of Renton. MOVED
BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE
RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
June 5,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 190
Resolution#3816 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and Ci Clerk to enter into an
Transportation: S 3rd St at interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department of
Shattuck Ave S, WSDOT Transportation for grant funding for planning and construction on SR-900 at
Grant MP 10.08 (S. 3rd St. at Shattuck Ave. S.). MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS
READ. CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the
Council meeting of 6/12/2006 for second and final reading:
Budget: 2006,Appropriating An ordinance was read appropriating the new programs and projects in the total
Funds for New Programs& amount of$4,881,755 to meet the need of new circumstances and opportunities
Projects in the 2006 fiscal year. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW,
COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL
READING ON 6/12/2006. CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and
adoption:
Ordinance#5210 An ordinance was read adding Sections 8-4-46 to Chapter 4, Water, and 8-5-23
Utility: Billing Adjustments to Chapter 5, Sewers, of Title VIII(Health and Sanitation) of City Code
for,Water Leaks allowing certain water and wastewater billing adjustments for water leaks.
MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCII.RECESS
AND ADJOURNMENT INTO EXECUTNE SESSION FOR 60 MINiJTES TO DISCUSS
POTENTIAL LITIGATION AND PROPERTY ACQUISITION WITH NO
OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING
.•= k � BE ADJOURNEI?WHEN THE EXECUTNE SESSION IS ADJOURNED.
CARRIED. Time: 9:11 p.m.
Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive
session and the Council meeting adjourned at 10:28 p.m.
��•�� CJa,Q�t`.o�
Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
June 5,2006
RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR . � .
Of�ce of the City Clerk �
COLT�I��OMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY�OUNCIL MEETING
June 5, 2006
COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA �
COMMI'TTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 6/12 Harvest Partners Infrastructure AgreemeYit
(Corman) 6:00 p.m. Update;
Construction Bids on the South Lake W��
Roadway Improvements Project
COMMUNITY SERVICES
(Nelson)
FINANCE MON., 6/12 Vouchers;
(Persson) , 4:30 p.m. Position Reclassifications;
Engenio Information Technologies Lease
Amendment for 3rd Floor of 200 Mill
Building;
Annexation Community Outreach
.�_ . . . ' �� ... . iTp fa.- r .
PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT THURS., 6/08 Chateau de Ville Multi-Family Housing
(Briere) 3:00 p.m. Property Tax Exemption Agreement
PUBLIC SAFETY
(Law)
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATIOl�
(Palmer)
UTILITIES
(Clawson)
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meeNngs are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council
Conference Room unless otherwise noted.
' ' � Exhibit C
�
King County
Department of Assessmeuts Scott Noble
King County Adminis1ration Bldg. fiSSeSSO/'
500 Fourth Avenue,Room 708
Seattle,WA 981042384 '
(20�296-5195 FAX(20�296-0595
Emall:assessor.lnfo@metrokc.=ov
www.metrokc.gov/assessor/
ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted December 20, 2005
to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson,
Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to
Renton of the properties described as the Perkins Annexation, has
been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and
assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with
the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination,
found to be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of
Revised Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002.
The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature
on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual
signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an
appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to
be the case.
Dated this 22nd day of December, 2005
.�C'0"'�iJ �'�Ls....---�
Scott Noble, King C ty Assessor
���
,,;..Eo
E��iibit �
PERKINS ANNEXATION.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The north 491.24 feet of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 4,
Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., in King County, Washington;EXCEPT that
portion of the east 30 feet thereof lying southerly of the existing City Limits of Renton,as
annexed by Ordinance No.4195;
TOGETHER WITH that portion of the west 30 feet (132°d Ave SE)of the northwest
quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., in
King County,Washington lying northerly of the eJcisting City L'units of Renton,as
annexed by Ordinance No. 4195; and TOGETI-�ER WITH the south 120 feet of the north
384 feet of the east 181.5 feet of the west 211.5 feet of said northwest quarter of the
northwest quarter.
�� -A �-.-_---�,��
�
' • ■� . �`�1�
• 1 t '' ''; ..
/
., .
�
� ���
r=7 � . / . ■ � •
� �� � � �
� ,
� -
�� ��r�
.. ` f _
� ,"„"��
' � � p � ;S`x�� �x���. �4�`�t��'�: t,
� � ����, �� �` .� � � � ����•�:' �
a � +� � �' �+ " ��r.�-�
° � ���� � �'� M �����
�� i�,':f��k 4�"� ��� �'S. �$�A�������''� �?h�k i$�.$ 4��,,,�"„
' � 8�. ��§�' �' _ x, '�
'� •, �� ��.':R A }
_ ` � x
.) , �: : .` t � ..> `� �>� i.�. :�A�
'�,A ..`'�Y
�� .. .. r.. a..
,.,� . . �,.� ;', t�.3�y..��� o .���. .
� �� � �-
1� '� �� ►I � ��n�
�� ,,,, �u�„� �71��
. �'
*� ,';� �� ■A ■ �
�u� .�� �g ■� ■
- ••�.- �:��.�
. _ _ /,
�. �"`� „" "� ���� � � �
� �. �, ��� � ��iiWL��L��i�ill
_
�►� �► � � � � ► �, , •
� � �� ►L���B�Wi� �A����� ������
��I •� � �� �/� � ��
� �� ► i� � ,�Q�
'� �- . i �� �� / �
/ � ... 0����10 ,,,���� �. ► .� � �
� � o ...� ��s� ��► ��� �� �. .
♦ . � .. ■
�►_ � � .c� �•� ♦ �
� � � � ����11 � �
. 11���� ♦ .
.; � � c� � ��� I�I���� .�
�•� .r .. �1�1�� ►��0�► •• ,,,�.` -�� ��♦
,� ������ ,., ,,.1 ♦I�
�i i � ��r .-`+ � ���
� -- ����� ����� 7 ��1
�. � � �.�► , , ������� �i � ,� ��
■ �i/ �/ �1 �!r ! ' , � � ��► �,►, ��
,�u���I�DI•�i���� � 1� +� ��
� � .. � �
11� � , • �� � ����' � ��'`�� �i
. .� �1 , , �
�� � . . .� � __ � WL����� u��
' � . �,� ��
.. ` f� --�-� �....�i
,r ,,,,, �� �ll ..�.. . , /rr�E���A��l�1
I.. �; ���r� : � W���j���
�1� �I ��'i t� I� �I
� �� � ���irt - '
� �i � , ►�� ���� ��� �� �.
■� � � � �Ilc���
�
� ♦ � . •
�
. - ... -. . . . .. . . 1 � 11 : 11 -
' • , � �- - �� �� ,,� . •:::::.�:::.�r.�;:;s>:>::�;:s?:�;::�;>;>;::>:�::? N
" . . , . .� . , ...... , • '
��' ' ' - �:i>:i:{:;i:�;>
, •11� / '
_ _- _ _ \ }LAKEBOREN
V
_ --_ ___ _- _ = M ��x
_-__-�_=_- __- --==yrKE_t}v.SHlfn;xata_-:,-_�-..="_-
--____"--- -_-_'------------------'_--'- a
8
�
�
0
.
�
a
„� -�
�fi 4
�
�� �
` s
��
�
!
�
U
�
X
� "
PANiHER LAKE -_" -- - --
- '__="(,#iCtl_�QtlNfiS-__-��:.:
_"" ' _____' "
Perkins Annexation �°���°�A�r°��
,�.��,�.�.,�.»«+,�
Exhibit F2: Existing corporate limits 0 5000 100��0
Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
�O` Alex Pietsch,Administrator
G.DeI Rosario
Nzo zs JU�y Z� 1 : 60000
'. ' -, -- ___ _ _ =' `=== _ �
_ -_ _ " � �AKE BOREN
ti7
_'-__ _ _-_'- _ _ '
_ _. ____ ' _ __ _' __ -_ - _
'-_-'_"___-'_'_'__ _____ __' '
'_ _ � "�_ _ ___ _ _ _ __ ;
-- __ _ - _ -__ -_- M G�
�-- -=-'_-=_------_�a�csivasit7Ar�iopr----=----- ---�
�
-_--_� �- -- -_=_---- -- 0
�_- -_ ---_-'_- - Y`
__-__-_'_ � ��
2,4,
n z
z A a g _ �
yZ A � `6
O
Ro��� NE 4th t SE 12B St
A Nd
No.��(`M¢ MS Air ort N'a NE
B'
5 2nd St (.�
G
'�p ` � �4 �qo'
��x iG' �
�" ' •!
w a F� Sw nh s�
g SW�� wo
� Rentan Ydl
I
�
,��C�r ��'
� gWd �
` Q°0 •
Tukwda ay ;
� 167
Y
Sbander Blvd � -
� °� H i � 515 b!
; � � < � <
� a SW 34 A St
� � _
z Petrovitsky Rd
8 sw ai:�si
s ieocn °
SW 4 d 4
F
Q J8
o�
`�
L�
/ F _--_____ _ _
3
PANTHF.R LAKE _--_ �- _--_-_
` W°y
�_ `g.yy�a9s ___��- __. �� _- __
� ----LAIGEYQ4�f--=_-_
Perkins Annexation �����"'�
�������
Exhibit F3: Major streets and major physical features 0 5000 10000
Economic Development,Neighbofioods&Strategic Planning
�O+ Alex Pietsch,Administrator
G.Del Rosario
N.rO 25Ju1y2006 1 . 60000
___ � � - __ �. -__ �LAKE BOREN
_ _ ___ _ "' _ _ - - _� �_
_ "" _ --___ _ __ '- ��
_ . ------" ------_-- -----`_'--_ �fn
---- - -- ---------------——--- --------------
- ----- ------------——— ----- �----------
=-__==_=_-�=��d�=�=-:_:_-;` _==__-. STATIO
_ ___==__ == = =_ ===_= 12
ng
k
� ATION
, 11
o-
� � STATION
�a�fo 16
` n
t �
STATION
� 13 '
,� STAT ON
� 4
.
� -
U
LAR E DESIRE
�
� - --- � SIIADY LAKf
PANTHEft LAKE �
_____'_"__"_'_
ThY doon�nt b o nel pwa�GN
Per i ns An nexation ��������-�
�������
Exhibit F4a: Fire service area boundaries 0 5000 100��0
t Y Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
�O• Alex Pietsch,Administrator
G.Del Rosario
FNT� ZSJ��Y2� 1 : 60000
-_-- - _- -i� —- -
__ _ _ _ _ _ �LAKEBOREN
�
_' __-_ _- �-' _______"'"" ____�" "
Ms��r
----- -- --- -- -----i,blGb-i1'�,SCC61ciCet3=-�-__----_-_-_-__-_-���--
__-_-`______________ _ ____ __ �
s
8
C
�
O
c� �a
y�-,:r's:�,
� �a�[Fo�
L`�.
AKE
� P
� A
\
\ �
I
�S (
�
� .
�
v
- - LAKE DESIRE
SS
---��� ����� � SHADY LAKE
PANTHERLAKE - - '_� '- -
_'_ _"'_'_""_"__ ".'
1M CMt��a OM Y01��10�11.
Perkins Annexation �°��a��-� .�
Exhibit F4b: Sewer service area boundaries 0 5000 10000
Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
��` Alex Pietsch,Administrator
G.°`�R°�`'° 1 : 60000
NT 25]uly 2006
-"__"_—___"_ ___" _ __ "_ ___"__ . .I •
__ _ _ _ �p�p/ �LAKC BOREN
__ _- __--- _ = CO� �.IICCI� V
_____ _ =_______ _= ATBt � SEWBt DIST.
=_ _._ - : _ _ tr�.�oo�
�e��� . �
_ --- .�..
�,nx�w;asttn�ciai+=-_-___"`-_-"`-c =
earN �uavnt - --=--=---=-=------ - --==-- C7
uvice�nc� = __== = =` _ __ _
WAT6t & ----===-= ---=-=---
SEWBt DIST. `__� _
- - -- �LAKE BOREN
�
__- _' _ '--_ __ - �s Cc�'
"-_'-'-__ '-__- _ _ '-LhIGElSt,Sil7tiC1'Oti---- - ���_��
____ _- _-_ �---_ _ '_____ __--__ ! �
_- __ _-_ � i �
_ -_ _-__ - --__ �
n �
8
K
�
O
�� �
� �o- �
U Y'
�va'E
KE
�
2
� �
\ �
\
I
�
�
•
� I
��� LA ESIRE
v � �
I � �
�
� � SH
PANTHERLAKE I ���� �
-_LA1S,E-YS)WJP�S_'-:.;.�-
'___ "_ '._""_'
Perkins Annexation ����N�'�
lAM maO 4 ts ipMf WV��ri
Exhibit F5: King Co. UGA and Renton PAA 0 5000 10000
Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
�O4 Alex Pietsch,Administrator
G.DelRosario � . /0000
N•r 25 July 2006 b
_ ' _ __ �LAKE BOREN
"_ -_ �-_ __ G�k
M
_"--_--_�_-----�-_----`t,�_r.s�v�s(i{i3crli�a=—�."-� -��---�
__________-_'_�----- ---- ------- O
8
A
A
O
� �
lYX �i
�� F
� g
q
�
� a
\� •
I
� ��
�
�
�$
�
PANTHERLAKE -
-_�.A1C i.X[itW6S=-:,�
M OMl�en�N UM��ws
Perkins Annexation �°�����--�
Exhibit G: Proposed corporate limits 0 5000 100�00
ti Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
;O♦ Alex Pietsch,Administrator
G.Del Rosario
NT� ZSJuty2006 1 . 60000
— ��� �,�,r�1
� ' • 1 _ :::::" _ ':�::ti:;�'`" �
i'ti:�itii: -"':�.c•:
1
�:;;;.�.•:
_ - ;:;f;: _
��.,.•
�ir.�i
:i;ii
- " •::;:;:::'::>�::�i��::i�:+i — -
�i��;i�i:��5::
�:��Si
..ti.
- ;:;::
..v-�: �
c;'r.• -
Y•
�p r
1
•�f:.
��f�
••f
i:5� •�•b•�
.y� t.
a..
P. ,4,:•
'V:'ti
:'��
.1.1.
1...4.
i
•,r:
��l: ,ti•:•
•y.•- .f.
i
e r•> ::'r'%
.,RN
i?':
s:
`.`, .+: .'o.
�r'. :y�:• :�:�'�:�:
:''r: r
r.. .f.
:`�.
rtti.
..d'�'
.r.
:>
" r�Y•.•
•.�r.; •.•{.
��ti
a�•
"�'.i::':ti i i�:'i:��'i•'i i�':•:•.�•�••�::ti'.•�':•
:{'�i'i
•.'.'�'
::ti': •1Si
:.ti '� ���
��..��...�.
, •i:..:::::• �
:��ti�• :... -:l:l: �
.......�::Jt:...�.�.��.�..�
••J,�:.�� � ... . . ..•i•
:.•:.....:... � . 1 . •:•:.•.•.•:.:::.•.•.:::.•.•:...�.�... ..
.� �'� ..r...•:•}:•;�.•:....•:•'•:•.•}:. n... .
. ?�ta•.
..e ...r..•..•.•.�.•.•:::.a•::.�:•.•:�:�:::�}r:%r:•}:•}:•:�:�ri•T:�?{:?:�:-::�::'�:{:•.:
::::} .+. ':•.4•::•:.�J:�•:.•:'::'.'.':�•:::•:•.�::•:'•.•:•::•:.:'.::•:i:.�`::.�..::•�•.!':t.•h��`.i':: A .J...................:•.
•rlc.'.1' ''�Y.••.•:;.;i.'�::V::::•:.•:•.�.:'..........:.........:.........:..........:...::.:.•.:......�.•....•..�l�'�•. ••:P.•::V.'::.�.':::i......................:.:•:•::•::.•.:•::�•:
^.'.S
�o.o�.•. •:.�ov•. •:r�.tiv�.•?r.•.�.v:.•,r::o.:::::.:
� � fi:•.•
,.f.};••:•::o.....�.......... .
:��Y.
.er.........�.,........��.::•.�:::.�::'•?}:5�::::}}:;;�:%{�}:
t t r'••:;••:,:�'� ::a}:}7
..'�,.�,
..�.
� p�•.,y•.
:.5.'.
4
_ :.•'se:
•:::1•:
.,'f.:
.h ^!•:Y:
:`� _
.')i
�•:!.
.�•-'
:b•�•
Js�
••:•:'.::5•'. :•:�Y
••S.
i•
a�
y� ..4} �'..
::✓.
ik
�ti.�
::i1'
:•:ti 1
's'4.l'i
t .:.
..�' •.Y•':
v�}:�':;:�:j:;t�.?j:::•,:;:%;:s:?;:•:•S
v
.s.v.•
�."�"• •5::.':}:::•::
.�,
,''-'t�', s,.
�'rr'
� 'Y.
.ti•.�:t:�:,'�::,
rv
0
.o:�
.•y
.�. f,
-. �i- •a;{.::;•;�
,j,.,,
:A.`.'.
Vl::
:O:•:•:::'�•::�
•.0.�1�Y�
�.'.'.
•4
"Q•
•:'P.:'AL:
.}' ''�• 'i•'• 1,
•l
t
��l��
�
��i��
•�♦
.'s�'.' •.1•
.4..
{y
�"��t'::':�•fJ:•�':��•}}:�:•��•:•�Yl}�ti•:�
:•.ti•i:;�:•'.•:�.^.�:•��•::
- ..'..
- .I�_
S''
!
{.
F,
:,:�. :5�
•:7i':. _
e'.
i:?:�:
.i•
�'.
:�i�:�
o�v.vr..�:h••.•.•::�.v.�:
t��• �
..'..
.i........
3.
•�'� 'I.'J::
'.\
:.'..
.•v r�
•,r
i�v
••.v:
�'F.:S}v{:•;t o}o•.•:.•.•{.•::.•;:::
•+r.
..�
:�f�
'�^:'
.'a`....
`',Q'.
�Y:i�'�.�.�`i'::i:•ii::'•i':�'::
A'
1. ti`{{:.
•1�.������
��
.J.. .':4�:
••.S.
I
f1 i.t.
'�'S,•:'.v:...:}�•.{•�{•}$�:�;.;:!:�!:•.•.'.:�;�;t.:�:'v•
�
.......... ...... :.•.•.�:
ti .
:•r:
�y�,.��:i.., .�r
:%'•h• ��. •r,1s
ti
.f: .�h3 �.�F.�:
1 .
. t'�
..d h .i.•.ti!�:�::�
.�I� •.•�V�•::.V:�ti't:?:!•::1.•.•t::::•:}.•:•::•::�:}�.;.�:�.ti�':�f•':�::�:'•�:•:�`•';:;j••?•:;:•'}:••}:•�
♦j
':5`;.'i .A.
:.1:
�
:•.1•
�t
:'�:•
:titi•''
1.
�•:ti$
.Y
:•:ti':
}�
..�':•}:
V
::ti':
•:•`.:
�{,.. _ _
:�:ti�••
�,�y .s�•
}:v:�
,f.'ti�:
..�' .ti.
..:{.Z'�
r4:}•:
'•.r;::
a
♦s h 0.......
:�:i�: :�:ti:=
-y- 1.� ................ ,............ .
,�' �, .. ...........
� -�.s � ... .
�:i��:•. ti .. .......... .
,.. .. .
r
� ........ �:iti�::�::i2�::'��:::::::�i�:'i�:i•:?�i::�:'::::�:�:i::�i::�:��:�:��i:�i�i$:•':�ii Y::�::ic;��i�i:�,
�'� �' ...
..�s;:;i ...................
:.., ...................
:..;. ........,.. ..
�:. ...............
:.,. -
.,,:
s
..,.?
:•x.•::•,•:.::....
.5e,
.cv•
.Q.�
��� v.•}.G.
'r:v:� kv:S
�-o
Y - ''�:
dh
l:f�:
Y.':•:•
i 6 •.1Y
':`d�'.
:'`i:'
��:ti•:
l.
..S'.
n.��•.•�•:
♦ •
�'..
::l.•'::•:•':::��:
'..�•
.�.
�LS..
•:.V::Y.•}},'t:
�'...
Jititi�
S A.::.
:•:`.•
4���4�
VOJ.•..L•t•.
:'ti
„�
'
, '
}:ti•:• ,
.�
'i'i'iti
}:ti•:•
,
::C•.\.
.,:ti...•.ti;:}::::::
.�.
.r
,••:ti' �
}:v:•
,�,rti.
:�:ti:�
..�•.
�;:
..S
.y ::5.'
.�`}.�� `::
�•:ti.
..0. ..r•��`. ���4
.1Y.
L1Y.
:.ti. �1
:!ti��i
:A'.• '.'
..�.ti•.
SG
r'Ss`....
:�-::•
:::��..._.:-..:�$
.�
.�..
:��.f::::�:.
a
'OY1• 0"
.f.�
.:.ti..:::::::::::::.::.
Y1.�.:�
. �
_'7 � i�•
.:{.y 6�,
':1:•
♦ tiifi:•
.ti�:S%'v:�'•:�::::�ti}.
�.•..�
�fi.... .
�..
,.{
•eo.•:
'•:.r:.
,
:�:}�.
,
.ti::{d ,
r
':$}...::•':�:v�%•:�}:� �
::'r'.�:�:�+:•:•'•�:ti::;:•:}}��•'�:�:•'�'}:�.�:•'•'•••:�•{•:�'y{'••�'�••'���{:��•:,'��:sv'•:�}•••�••...:�:�:?%��:�'>•?':�}�:•�����:•:�•�:•:•:'•��}:�:�••••:••;••e'r';�:�
o.v5. �.+.. .•�.•. �",
•}:v:fi:.
�
. �:.. � r
:?�Ssv v.. .v.:•
..o
r
.,,�
•}k• :'s� -- - -
r.
',:{�4:•�,.�
.l .'Si �f��
OS •
{�
•}:•.':.��.'}'�•��}::t�:}}':�•tt:ti••!;•:}}.
.F.
1 A�
}ll::'::•:•:ti•:�•:t...o...:......................
�'�••:}h.
�•;� •.•r:.
� f.•
.titi:'.. �h•
:.L.�'.Y�':1 `i• :
.✓�1
T
•:i. ._..
.h. ............._.
i'1. •:'�
:'..
:.'a
.•.}
}.{•:'
.r.• �;�r�
�
:;:,:;.:;.}'}:��:�'::�:�:�.�.••'�:�'�r:�'�'�.
��v.ti r� +'rb
;�:{:�..
:
•'r
r
•:: h. ��l
•:titi:ti�:•:•::•:•
�.• "'...........
:•'i'.Y ��'.1ti•} ..................
-
•A...�" """....... . �
�'.��. . ..........
:•:'R ....
.,b. .,., ............
�A�• ...
. .�. .............
:Y .....
;:��;•i;',•;,�� ................
.L h•.
'4_+1�':
':'v: •�-43
��.
:A•"Y.. 's �
':f.•i
•:4t: -
••�!
♦
:�:'1� -
.r...•..•. .
�'v::•:•:•:•:�:�:�'�:ti:;';:?;:;:};:;:;:;:;:;}�:;:;�;�:�$
.a
•.•r.• v. .o..
. �
:•.v.•o..•. �av •
✓.:•}:?'r:•:}::•}:•i:•?::•:�:•?:{•'r}i}:•'r::}:�;��;'{�::'�:::�}:{'::::'�'r:::::.}�;:��;:?};:��4::•,:�:�'::�}{�r::}�$:�
........ . •:
...... ..::::..
......:. ......... .::•}:•::�.::
:::::.•;.; ......... . . ...............
.............�.
..ti
:�.ti• f•:.�.•.v.:•:•.•
..R4:•.v.ti'�`•• o
..ti.e a
•r.�n �'�:•'r
-
4� �;a
.v.•
ev
-
.v:''�.. 1�'�:�:�:�;vi�:{v:':fi��}:�i:?;.;{:�;.;�;�;�::�:�✓:•r:;:?;:j}iY}:;}}5'::i:{;};';7;�'r:�[}(}:�✓'�>i�t'vi -
.......
.r..o +.�'• a.
:�.��...a..7'•. � {
�r.•.v:".•:}:X::•:idtifi}rk{•}}}y}}}}}ir:�'r:{�?:v}I:�:{�:•:'rY�?i'r:{{%r::;:•:}y}}};:;};$?'•��ti'�:
�
.......
::..;...�.. ::::.:}?:.}•.}}•:.•.•::{.;:•.};:;•:•.�:...
::•..:.:::. :::.�.....:.:....... ... :�•..v
v.o• .so• �.
..k.
:�:y:�
:�v. .rs fr ��
:.s,}vo e�:
�
'
.�.,. •q'•y
�
�
.6ti ti �•.+A�:
:%;ti:�:::::j::°{
•.f .
•sv•.
�.v:%�:�:•:����'S:�'�:5:�1�:�}"r:��C�I�"�::t{jt?:.'•�{;}'?;'r.i}:{::.}t'�$}}'rC{Y,.'r}:r:}::j>:?}:•:•t�'r:v:<�S:?'{�}}}:�}i{S:�'};}�'��}}i'ti�'�$::�}$..........
::v}.ti•
r.4
$:��• ..s'Z
,
.��
.�a�•. �'P�:�:
I'
•.s.
'
35.. .�'�s•
'•°{ .�{�:�
�..••Jr�>'v
�.y w.
::S•
ti r r..
.,r rer••
..S•.':•:.V.�. 1:����� " ,
u
�
:..:............�.
„
■
�
.�.
;.
I
:•:`J'::'::}'41 d•
:titi
.J..
:�ti.•�'.
.{.1:.
�•:ti:• r�.
•�ti'..�rti':•::�
':•h
.�.'.�'.�':�
::Y:
':'p:•:
..:.':"•'�:�?••••t
..
.y�h� •
�•:•l•:}:•�ti':1 I
..r.
W
f.
...e --
1'�'r
.?r' s
-
;•✓'f.{
.r'ti.
•ti�:
�
.
.}.z
_ A
1
..�.
�
..:ti ,
:::ti.
......
ti
>. .��
:::��
-
ov r
♦
...r. �
'�::
r:
'�'{.% .�r
- ::v. .r::
.•:ti•�� ..
..'.``•' ....... .
.. -.--.. g
.....
... . ... !
.�
.. t�'
..... . _ �
::f:::::: _
::��.
■
..:::::..... ..:..�::. .....:...:.::::..............................:.:.:..:....
- .:�..
:.....:.:::,.: ........:.:::::......... .
....:::�..
:�..
#
::.:::......:. . .. ......... ..:....::.�:.::.::.............:�:.::::.�:.:.::.:.::
'=A:Sy •:1::
' .:S'i
•:•1:::•:ti�'"L
- ,
.1�
.S`'
:•tiY
�.o. r
��..
}.'.•.
.
•:G
�..au�{�
�
'__ . .......................•}Jt.:•:• �
:::`r3.:YY.. .�.�rr:�M
:::,;f�ti:' - — '\
�•.'�{:'�i'.• , .�
���f• „
,�
:.:k iW
::�:.�::� , _�
::.�� _
•���::ti��',,; �� - � ��� '� ���
_ :::tif:::::� I�A ■
t:h••::�'S'. . '����, � 1 I ��,
:::{::::::�� � � T�i , �
, ►.� .
::.�;:f�;:. � �� '
';:;:''�>�r� � � .
:::��:.��:,���,':� : � � �. ���'����,. �, � ��
�,��•.'.:���:.. , .� . .L��
. ti f.1:1fII'tiy � � , '. ' ., -,
_ :. f'••'•6rs•.-.-..-. W.����i�� ��
..ls,•°+�h"�? � � � �
+:i�f.'s'�''',:��� �- ,:�:� • ��I � .
�„� �: {Y�'t,sr-�.-•- , ,
��� �,'" ����a ' .
,� •� I;����G�' } y'•��,��
{fti�?�fs `�-''`-'-,�:?
y,M� w � `f� ��r. ...
� ��.s���.� ��� I�I� / �
.�...:,f����- �� ��� �'r�i�
, r,.
�, ti r �.� r r.
• '�; ����M���`z � �,
,,4,,;: . a�y. _ � �
::•Yf'���ik •r.•yy� J•� - ��� , � �,
�'�:``��}• �' 1 ���
" ':�.''•�.�L�'`IY. �f'K�.'`�'i' ,��
,,, �
❖d•.• ..T: A�?.4Il:•:���:..� - - ��,
� � � �
�
• • • ' • � - • . 1 11 . 11 �
• . � � - ,. • �� ,,. . •::::•;::•::•::�:•::�>:•:>:�:<•:�>:�:�:�:::::�>:�:::::�;:
�
- - �. � .
• ' '; - - ... • 11
` � ` � RECEIVED ,
Annexation Review Form OCT 1 2 2005 '�
CITY OF REN�ON
[ X ] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petiti�TiuTY sYSTEnns
TO : Building Surface Water Utility (/
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Perkins Annexation
Location : The proposed 15.09-acre rectangular shaped Perkins Annexation is located
along both sides of Union Avenue NE between NE 27`h' Street, if extended,
on the north and NE 26`h Street, if extended, on the south. If extended, its
western boundary would be Queen Avenue NE(128`h Avenue SE), if
extended, and its eastern boundary would be approximately Vashon
Avenue NE, if extended. The site is located in Renton's Sewer and Water
service areas.
Date Circulated: October 1 l, 2005 Comments Due: October 21,2005
General Information
Area . 15.09 acre
Street length . 400 lineal feet
Assessed Value . $828,000
Estimated Population : 7 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units
Commercial : N/A
Industrial . N/A
Public . N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . 46 Residential Detached Units
Future Po ulation • 107 eo le
Reviewing Department/Division: SURFACE WATER UTILITY
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?
The Perkins Annexation drains to the May Creek canyon, where there are existing flooding, erosion,
water quality and fish habitat problems. The May Creek canyon is located about 1000 feet north of the
proposed annexation area. The downstream flooding and erosion problems could increase due to new
development draining to the May Creek Canyon, which causes an increase in both peak flow and runoff
volume.
(Over)
� ,,
Infiltration of runoff, if possible, should be encouraged and compliance with the 2005 King County
Surface Water Design Manual Level 2 (Conservation) flow control standard is recommended to control
runoff from any new development within the Perkins Annexation area. These requirements will
minimize the impacts to peak rate and volume of runoff that occurs as a result of new development.
About 10% of the proposed annexation contains steep slopes with high erosion potential, and the
remaining 90% is moderately sloped.
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
area?
Public storm drain systems do not exist within the annexation area. However, from the west boundary of
the Union Ave right-of-way, a 24" diameter cmp culvert discharges into an open channel on the property.
This channel exhibits erosion and down cutting of the channel bed. Local residents have attempted to
armor the channel to prevent bank erosion. Within the proposed annexation, this channel fans out and
becomes undefined. About 100 ft. downstream of the channel end, a homeowner has had to dig an
interceptor trench to drain stormwater away from his yard and house. This King County resident has
filed a complaint with the City regarding stormwater runoff from Union Avenue inundating his property.
We recommend that the permitting of any future development of the Perkins Annexation will require
construction of a downstream conveyance system to a proper discharge location as required by the 2005
King County Surface Water Design Manual. Note that even in the case of future infiltration facilities, a
downstream conveyance system will be necessary for emergency overflows. Construction of a
downstream stormwater conveyance system will require easements from downstream property owners,
and plan reviews/permits by King County DDES.
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
The proposed annexation represents a logical extension of services provided by the Surface Water
Utility.
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
The annexation of this area and eventual full build-out of this proposed annexation will incrementally
require additional resources for maintenance of infrastructure from this annexation. At some point the
City will need additional personnel and equipment far maintenance due to new development and
annexations.
Based on the current annual operation and maintenance cost of $238 per acre for the whole city, the
operation and maintenance for the 15.09-acre Perkins Annexation will be approximately$3,590 per year.
Based on the current annual Capital Improvement Project cost of$227 per acre for the whole city, the
added CIP cost resulting from the Perkins Annexation is estimated to be approximately$3,425 per year.
The total Surface Water Utility cost for O&M plus CIP is estimated to be $7,015 per year for the
proposed annexation area at the same level of O&M and CIP service that we currently provide within
City limits. The existing Surface Water Utility revenue for the 2 single-family residences is $194 per
year. If the total number of new single-family homes under full build-out will be 46, then the maximum
revenue will be $2,975 per year.
H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations�Perkins�Perkinsl0%Rvw.doc�RShs
� �.
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation?
The City would not assume ownership of any stormwater facilities, except for storm systems within
Union Ave NE. No new agreements or franchises would be required.
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the attached map.)
The proposed annexation boundaries are fine.
General recommendation and comments:
We recommend requiring new development to comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design
Manual standards, which would require basic water quality treatment standard and the Conservation
Flow Control Standard. Furthermore, for any development in the proposed Perkins Annexation we
recommend that a Level 2 downstream analysis be required per the 2005 King County Surface Water
Design Manual, as drainage complaints have been filed and downstream stormwater conveyance
facilities are inadequate. Currently, the downstream area relies on total infiltration of stormwater runoff
from Union Ave, but during the more intense rain storms downstream properties have experienced
flooding. We recommend that with the future development of the Perkins Annexation, the developer be
required to construct a new downstream conveyance system to a safe discharge location.
t /
Signatupe: r Date: /O ' � � '��
�"
cc: Lys Hornsby,Utility ystems Director
Mike Stenhouse,Maintenance Services Director
John Thompson,Maintenance Manager
Raymond van der Roest,Civil Engineer
S' c �,
� � � v� .z.�� �' ,��� r�'� ��� �� ;,
h
�� �.:3 a! � �, y ��� `�� � � .�.. t.�r`"fi`��� �` � � �
�� ��� ��-.� � .�� ' � � � � � . �� ��� � !; �.
�� �� ' , ....� �$8 � a s?..
��� � v��� ; � `•: �, "" � � �. ��� � ���{,'
�� � ,.� `` �'�� .,� `�� a �� i� � c � ��� ��� � �'�
� � �
3
� � _. � "�e . ��f, �, a _ c.�.,�, �, `��� �, ; �
x � ��� � ' �eE ,..�� �� `�' � �>, �
r.,
ni �� ' � � "�� �r. � ,���.. g� ��� ;��� - � . �q � �._ -
� ..� �� �� �,� �.. �^ �^� ,'x'" .�
0
��� � � ��� 4� �
s , � � � ��� ��,
� �.�b �a _�' �. �� �� � .
� � .aal � �. ��� _�� � ... ,� ��������'�� � � � ��3 �'�
�'_ - �� �' ,� � �' � ' � �� � � �' "� d
� y � s � '� �, �� `� �
a�� $ i �� ° ��������� � � �' � � k �� a•e�� ���,R�� �� a �
� ��-���� � �� � �;ir� � a a� �"`� .. #���� � . �.e � ,��. ,��.
� �� �� �
�� 3 `��� � ^33A€ a �3 � � � � �, ��,"'� " ����
� � $ � �t� a � � � :� , �„��� �_.
�: �> � �
�'�: . r� ��� � � � � � �� � � ��
u.
� � ��� ����� �... � , �
� �� � � �, � �� ,� � ��, ��
� :- �'' �`� ����� � � � � ; � � �� � ��� �
p�_. � ��� � - a� ra' � � � � �, � � '� � � '� � �t
3 s
� � . ���.a y �"g � ' � :.� � �
r�� � ,
� ��e ��� ,�2 � . �� � �� � ' �� �� ,I�a� � e
�
� r '
� .� '�.�' . �.. � ����• �' g� �m�'� � � s '�`
� ,� � * � "�'
? \ .��, � � .A �' �
�>
� �� �. � a�^ �� �x�� �� �_.;� � '�,a �`
�
��,,. .� " .:�� � �.� � ��� � �� �,' �� . � � ��
�� �.._,. � � � �� � �� � �
��.� '� ��
�^ <.E..�' �. �� � � � � ' "�� � \ ��=
�
� ���� ". e �'� ; '� ��' � ��' �' � � ��
' � �
.-..��� , . ,. ��,. ' ,�a�" q y �--� '
. ,•, ,� '^ >• a
� ; A e � � . �"'� , � �t �;
� � �r? a3 :� � � „
� � � � �� � � � �� �
..:� �, �� ^� ..! � �, �,. � � �� a� � � .. � �
,�. \ - � - � g , � �:� f
�,a '� ��� > ' �s- ,�s . .,.-'$ ..'d� ' � 5 a,� a��
�����;a .:�� �`�'.. 8�-F� �r � � �.« .��.�� ,...,��„h.�, �'':� �,� � „���
����� � . �. � . � �� �� � �� �
��" � 3 '' r��"� � '� � .��'��' �.��;�;' , i � '°�;� ,� �;��-;
�R:.``� aeL a� j �'� �� ; � °�� � . - .
� 5 i, m � 'a . a,; ;�
�" �.- � � :
Y� � �,�" � � R � (3 � �2`�� ��. �
, � il ��>, � � `va�. ���r �� 6 ��ti '� 9 g � �
��. y� �s , i ,�
i 3 �� �, a.,. -�� �� ' � � ''�� � ��r
�� ��T ��� �� �. � � � � � ����������� � ��
� I '.k� � .� �' .
� '� �� � =�.:..�.�.. ..�� � �` �� e
�
� � � �"�� � �
�,a��.� .� �,� � �. '� . t , � '� A r�t. � ,'Y'
� � �. �.� ;�� _ � 1 '. a �",.,. z
x �' � �,
� ..��..,�TE
� � ��` ' ��a, ��z ' ,�, a. ��r��i�-` � 9, � � ",'�� *� � � ,� ��
s
e� � ' ��' � � �� ;� � � �� s� �.
� "� ti'�'aa ,t� � ` �. , � 1 . ' � � _ a� .. ,I.
�
��.� �� � � �� f � >A �- � � �f �
:� ��a^��� g �" .. �. .�' ��w �� �� � s� � km �
� �
` '��. ^�- .�"'`� � *�,'� ��. F� � ; .�, �`� � "� v k'�An
� Y«+ :. �«. � � � . � °�
I"��.�....... �...�,�� ... � ,r� ""� �em. . e �` ��.���1 ��� a �� ����"'� g � �
�� � �.,, .�� f [«. '.`�; t.� �� ����� ��' � ,`. �
m. � � .
�„ ' � � � .� :'� ��4- P� . � � ���'�i. �..,# ��� ��� � � ���� � :
.,s�
k
� '� � � � � � , .,:... ��� - � '�
- i�.,.� ��� � i �,_ ���� � � '� s� :
;��, � � �. `@'� ` �a��"Y�� �.�
;'� .� ���. ��.�. �� � ";� � ��� ���:
�� . � � _
� � �a � � ���� � � � ����
� � �` � � �`�� �'' ��.:. �� a ��� a��� �� ��., �,j� � 3�
� � � - w�. � �.""' � �� �
���, '� y"; � � � �,` � . �' �, s ',� �� � :�� � �f�� � :
� s � , � ....� � � ._ � �
� ` �': � i � a�; � & � ��� � �� � �`��� � � � �
� ,; � � ��� ..v ' � � �
� � �,� �� , � �. �� � �o �� �p.. �� a �� � ���d
��
,
at '�" � � � '��.,`..�� " a� ,.,�.�. .���. �_�.�.. . _�.'�'�.
.�,� ._ . _.,s,..a,; � _ �_'�. . ■_ .. ... ....__ . . . . . ._._._ _ '..
Monday, October 17, 2005 3:35 PM
�n� ' i i i � . .
/� - �j i��/� �/'�,Q � . . .. ' Q .. ' ., ` '�..
� A
" :� �
��� ... . � ��� _, .... .. . /� '�.
"��-- �� f �
,��,-+� � � � .. . � � �✓r � .
. ...�- 9c��� id�_.�,.- �7v�/�._.,
r � P
r � � " .. �'` ...� �' . . �\ . ry .� .
_-__'- �
. . . ., � ^/ 1. �- ��, � ��\\ Y/ ___ � // � �/ . \�_ �.
� i � � � .7J 6��� �t - - ;
/ � p�, ��lulllll�G�'b^.. /�� /i'� .�
- � , �
i, � �
.;, , �.. � ., . ��/ �. �i--9�.� _ �� . .� �Cj��L�I/�{%T , . _ F � %� ��� ��'\\ �.
� ` - \ 1
� .. .� ,� -_,.."_�-,1'�--- "` . �� � , . � � ��, t �-� ♦
y / _""' 1�� �
` �O. ''�� . . ��' . .... � �- '_' `�z _� ' I \ �y\� ' .
E ,
� �' � ___
�'' "'" �j ;5,�.� � ` � -'�- =%.,.. ' /�_� �, '�� � �,.
F � �
�,.�„,
4 �� . . �'�� ���� -��' . � _ Y\ ��__ _� - .•i 9 ���.�... ��'�' �. ��
i�. ��/ / ` \�� �� •. �/ 1,71i i/ d 4P! f�'.� �.
��^w.C�^�...�-.�,/ ��� � ��- _��""' --' -_�\ /�.°""^ \\ ��'-��_ ` � ��___,...--__---"-"' "�_'�.4� :9 Il t9.B2-2 I �� .. �.
� � `/��. . � ' �\ l i� �.'7 ��_yp � �
^."���. �-'l�. �� -�_'___� � . _ / .,/`9 9 � u9,BE-I �' -�
� �y--'.i�--v�J+ .. ���� �� . � , ..\ � �.�^�_� -__-�^__� �V / 1 �i ���
. � \� .� �i-�-��` �.� . i�� .. I
� / ��*�r �� �` r �,,, //y� ''''�\\` �».. \ 1 ` �\ ����.R�--__------"�-� -- \ � �
� �. • � �:- � �
�' � . �--�^br` �,,� /� / .. ,,,� . .� .� �� � �1��
./. �-.�..�'.'` - �, .,.2 n ���C� ._�'/� � � �• � /'\\ �-,�_' � . �." "'------------ - . '.
a�- 1 � '� /JG�.�P��.��� ' �� . . �� _i� \ �` �/ ..-'"-- ^- � � � v-�. : �. . .
� `
[ r � _
� E _ .: rY �� � ��� � i�+:�.
`, ti � - - �
' , , 1\_/ . \;._ ' ,'�. . �,�,,,� .
P
;; � �, .. --^^''..--. ,i"' \\ .
� . �� � ��.,..r:.- _ _..._�.�6 1 . � .� , I � � ..
�B 13 I.. „'� , . ..Vl" \ �, I .. . . { � .. � . . � � � � .
� n>n
9.p3'
� 4i� , �' 1 �1 � �. ; I ';
_� L.�.....�.�. � �>� � '���� �9th� Stt� °°+ � � ,--,-% �� �..�.�9 �
11 +9.E3-3 Q , . . ' 1.g �yy
; . � ..._ , t'S , . 9.8 ' .82�f 9�bP"'l� t-l , ^.
, �- .B,E3� ..'���, � ',�.�i e � � ,� � �`� , . � � �� " 9.H3- . - 9.L3 �" �
,��-e- . �v� l� 8'. � �
� � ,� �
,, o.ra-x'' ��t 4a'���� ` ; ` �i L.(.e►1n��. 9.s3-:.��6` �� $
�.. 8 �_��_r _ �,' � 1 ;. _;, / ' 'C '- '
• �; ' � � •t, 1-� ,�4t5 1 � .
: . .. l9�'�._ ... ..i• .-��'.�,..._ ' ��. ��G 1Uli'�Pl,�'t � .� w.�'
_ _ _ Stl+y 3h" .�,r
� � '� e,r3-s e.p-i @.�a � _ �� e a-3 � e,cs-z � �"', �" � �l �E.�
` ....... _ . . ..,:. ...,. .. _ ��; � - B.G3-3 . '
.� ' / .. . . 9 H3 ...' ,
K
�A, . B.E9-��, �itJ . �y�p,y�f, �+,{, '� �ei3-3 , � � ��. �� �� 4�83'1 .
.8 �`Ut�'7 Lf'�lr{r �� - B.G4-7 �`'^'__-�/
� � , � q � �
�����V� ��_ ��� A�\�V6rF�1 ,�@ 4-14 : � � ��.A��.re� .�� � , � �� . . . '9 •
�\��\� � �'� �� * [[ . . � , -B . 9,py_30.:. .IYL L��fi � :
`/ ! �,.
\ \ � � I
\� � � � _.., . . . . . . � :
\ \ ���. �-Q 4- �� 1.�..� - � � . .
�� �\v.-_-� , 4 i � �(�. � . � , . h r I � � . . 79 .
�� 4- � �� �i . � yG '. •�W'�p- � . '�`.j-� dV�9 4 .}�. 9'8��� � / .��, .
.. Z::� _� �.• 4 1�-" e,F+.-� t,
\� 8 .i � . �' :� \ .. , __ �'9 6 h ..T ' B.N4-7 9.B4-6 �. � � .
/ .,-' t� ,� � . �B.G�-30 A, � . ... . � ��-:.
, �
acy � , �� a -3 f. ,+ S 1----� �
g
' � ��`!��:� •�i_yy,�-i,� �-6.F4-1 �/. , @�y -� . .I� � �� ��9, -t
�{t,������� �1�\`�..� ���;.ye��.. �,Rp„^F F4_3 � ,.� . �' �/���B�4-2 B.GI-�� P � A b C: � V ,... � EF! - . :.9.C4-11 . ��.
�tbS�i};�\ \.�� � `i'" Y oA.EA-1 B.Fh�� ".8 .h ..� ��. ���+, ����8 . .. ...� B.G4-Z R ._: ,"��"S ,!�+f�' qgp � _IM� ryry� �,,,) ry. .G-30. , ��.
,` �V11��1�j 1�\\.\\\\\\,����-`� ;B 4-9 , 8F4-1 �� . �k,y • \ . �1 B.H4'2 k.l\C �P_�.�� i-t�9.B4- � C.�C.t°1W I'� ., 84'2 �. 1
N �'`� 'i''i��'�\`'�y�`,\ � - - ' er�- eF,-s �'+ , � � � � P�4-3 B.H4-1 .B4-3
� ��� I�1 � � \� \`,\ � � ���� � _ _ \> . , \ � � � I B.H4'S . 9.H4-� , ,.. � �
� •\t�i 1',11 1`1\\\��\�\�`\�� i �1% �/ /��'� 8fA^�..., .F4+7' .} � ��� �� 9.H4-12 ��,.H1-3 � I;
� � � li 1`l\ �\\\�\�\�\-= X �..�,��., � ' � . � .. � . � .1. 9,C4-6. �
�� �� �� `���:���,-- _ �'�'/� °� i�� �°�rY ,�'�; .B4-9 �
1�A ... I �\� �\�\�__� -��/f i�.I @,FS-15 � 83�l � \
'���t\.'�'. 1 \;�\1---- /r�������� � . � �k.' -N . �� . B�G,S'3 . .. . . 8113-2 , �/ ,�''
W _ l',l 1�. !.@'S � B,H�1 .;� W
i 1 , I ..♦ -� ��� I �'�. � � � � � O �
� ��I\4�\\�'� `\\ \�\ ,,�:j,I 1 1 �1 1k 1�4 ' CI Lt! , �•C! �r '�9.B7-8 . „ `^, 9, �
� �4����, . . . �, !� I �1 is �� , .. 8.F�y ��C7 y$�cp�.3.@�,f,y ,{, ,�� � � . ��..�_ 9.83'p .. ..
1 1 �"����`.� \� � :I I � � 1'"\ '�.8�. . '• .'cs6 � blJG.� C7Y4�1 {v4 � �� . �
� ����r . _- . '� � 'i 1. � j e,�-s lo e.cs-� 8� e,cs-, o�� ��.u'� 1� w
���,��� -. �t ; � � i �` -s e e s-u ,cs-i�e.w-� e is e, e.cs-� 9.ss-s
�.�. � �'o��\\ �� \\\� � � .�, \� �v�� ���� t 8 .16 �8.G0'13� .G3'21 8'GS-31 . ... I . �
� 1 .G3-24
N `'"`,�a , �;\`, � � "� , . ,"`° 1•. . � y. , e.cs ea' ',
r . , ��� ��.� �:�����a�*'i\� ���*�+� y%��°�,`:+\�\ ,��t- �
^ ..q� 1.\,,\, A 1 4:�, 1 �.�, tif�` i ��;�. �'. �.�. \ �`.'.� ,' .'.� 1 � � ..� B.GS-E8�� . .. .� 'B3-9, . � '•.
Map G�atpui' '� Page 1 of 1
�'� �C�r�� �au��t��l ���� �,.'��� '���"�� �''��,�:'� +'��7�����u�������,`�
iMAP - Stormwater
aa�r� '. a���* °�� �,/
�.ry1}�cg+���.. ! . ��,_....�_�.�-�--�-...a�
�..�..� .....M `>ASl, 3 't.���� � �JC$ . �b��^ .
;
� r3�fiS��i R �-�.
� � ���TTJ � !�.rd3 "`�.� ��
! � 3 � 3
�sY`?�
k _. «
' �"��i���'"��'�� � .... a ^-»
q¢}A
V.� .��' � rfr u£�; .
ry ... � ..:�.
,y�y„«.�«ax �� ._.�_,. ���� ��"$2� M�a1 �G,�, ,,.�.
��
s Ldl ,�,.,_.� � �.�.�t�� es- `�� �� �
t�� " ,t}(�t� �Y�dAtk�.,, �#3't�3 F� `��' �,�.�..��, ����S��Y3�" . �
�S' 6 "`� ; ''"^--.�.i�`�.' S�'"�t�
�a � ,�.
�{��$L� "� ��"� ,'�'�.�?'!a"! �t�fSY!°y�� R�"��� � � � `E �-�' �� ,�
��?3d f'� ��!$ .� �J1�.} : �� �� .,_:� _.... ,.... � �
g ,��� ° �.. �, >
'�3i2'�� 3{� `nr�.�ri P �!35���jPG} a ;�511�" ' �1?S.' S�'��� , �n ;
. -t�;.�:� . _,.„_P _�,,.,.. . , ''�t$3' �,
�J���-s . _ _,�.�. ...�..��m,.� _
; � £�2't.t�t � . „ �� , �!i�.,w'
°�� ��Tkf�C�� � .. � , t71,3J� �����
4�J�2 � 1`d��:'t{�L.�.: � ..,.,�
�. t 'n� � ��13�'t� ��.
,��_._.,. ,,,,.._,W.�,„.,.�„� g{ 7
a`��4�.�t6 ���}� �� x �3�'� � "� � 3 i � .�..�
k�:��3 ,,;'.. `= % �x......�.,.....f f . -w=s—����
������.Sr�.! , 5���l+3 � a� ���� �
��� �
�Y� ry 7$�"3 x"5�1 �. .. ... < ^�r'vf�f� � � ....
�..,�.,..µ ....r..:.. ..,.,..,,,�..., �
���°r .._. ...,,�,,.�,�.,� �mu...� �...«.�. ,,,,,��„,�
� _
- � � �tt� ���� � "..
� s��a.� �
�=sr�J r "`x � t`� ' '
Jt� + fi z� ' ; -`��'�3�<S�F� 5��� ,
� .�
, ,� t �� � ;r a
�:tu�� f�¢3�.�>. � !�.��vl i, � ��� ��� �,� „€,K��...XuT�"'�..�� ,.,_,.„���+'7 .
, �__.....,,� ,e.£�'�.���.. � ,,. „.., . ' ._..
:. , � � �a ��� i., ..
�a:t���N,f.l � fi�6�r� y�' ,.
.... � �_ � y ..,,,.
-...., py .._ .�>.a . R��. � y
y p 3
�i.?�iJ vEJ.��id 3� ."'� `�ryzym4vwF.zww�;« � � �f�� .... �'- �o t�
. ._.._..._ ..........
.. . ..._,_..., .., .� .�..
v ��s� ��1�3`��{cyf . � � !�b�s+H:
_„m �..� �� �
�- .,_, r. _ _ , r•
�
:P?P�k J1�� � .. .... : — , . } .�� �""-r--
��F� � � ;.� `;� � �":_'+f i+f:�t �
Stl'� � � '
��ttt! _r. �'"^�' E � � _: ��4er� rl�g�t. . <.�t
� e�",�� �Pfi;i �E�e'�r � s �� � , ' �"�� a I
, � � �
3
:t1�� . ; �'�'�i�� � ��z�z�r �xJ?a �P��:i ���'IJ J.'�'���f�.! rt£�aJ r5�.y�F, �
� ` � � -
{�CI�+ir Kara�4�+�ut�tty 4,' , s?''.�3'� ��AY 3*r � `"r�. 1�s��7 �'a� �� _ .. s =_ __
�: ' , �4�u -^ � -,.. .F� ,,�,.,,., � - �£l $�3tE 1!r'F�n,�y(,�t
��L��n�
` = Caun�l�y Bv��d�rY Pat�ts i:rMa�•:��a�u.���;���.�c�
�« Yti�r��unt�i b'��i�r R+��ur,� (""""'t �.�k�s a�.i L�xr�c��tiuu�rs ND�tlE
iriv�nt�ry�t��� L.....!
�'`,�� ��r��rrn�
atz��ts �'�!.RC3 L}�aina���amp�a�nts
_}�-rx�i,� ' 1s�z�r�L�rd Ar��
,,� t+.�sM.�-0 ��"!l�3t�i L`as�rtisiiici�s�i�z�rr�� /VYN�
�.
, =�*� �,�a:��rr,z�.vv
�...m. ..r�;�
he information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice.
King County makes no representations or warranties,express or implied,as to accuracy,completeness,timeliness,or rights to the use of such
information.King County shall not be liable for any general,special,indirect,incidental,or consequential damages including,but not limited to,
lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map.Any sale of this map or information on
his ma is prohibited except b written ermission of King Count .
King County�GIS_Center�News�Service_s�Comments�Search_
By visiting this and other King County web pages,you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site.The details.
http://www5.metrokc.gov/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=overview&ClientV ersion=4... 10/18/2005
i . r
-� Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
Yesler Buildirig, Room 402, 400 Yesler Wny, Seattle, WA 98104
Pliorte: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • yittp://wzozv.metrokc.gov/annexntions
October 30, 2006
City of Renton
Attn: Don Erickson, AICP
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
RE: SUMMARY
File No. 2241 - City of Renton - Perkins Annexation
Dear Mr. Erickson:
Enclosed is the Summary prepared by Boundary Review Board staff for the above-referenced
Notice of Intention. The Summary will be sent to the Boundary Review Board members, along
with the Notice of Intention, as part of the agenda packet for the next regular monthly Board
meeting.
If you see any corrections or clarifications which should be made in the Summary, I would
appreciate hearing from you at (206) 296-6801.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Enclosure: Summary
FORM 11
�� � -
SUMMARY
FILE NO. 2241 Thomas Guide Map No. 626
Date Received: 10/27/06
Date Distributed: 10/30/06
ENTITY City of Renton
Date Filed:
ACTION Petition for Land Annexation
Expiration 45 Days: 12/14/06
TITLE Perkins Annexation
Board Meeting: 11l09/06
Location The site is located on the north side of the City of Renton. The
eastern boundary of the site abuts the boundary of the existing City of
Renton. The northern boundary of the site is generally formed by SE
96th Street (if extended). The western boundary of the site is
generally formed by Queen Avenue/128th Avenue NE. The eastern
boundary of the site is primarily formed by Union Avenue NE.
Land Area Approximately 15.47 acres
Land Use Current: 3 single-family homes
Future: Approximately 46 single-family homes.
Population Current: Approximately 7 persons
Future: Approximately 106 persons
Assessed Valuation Current: $828,000.
Future: $20,178,000
County Comprehensive
Plan Designation Residential Use
County Zoning Residential—Low Density
City Comprehensive Plan Residential Use—Single-Family/Low Density
(4 dwe►ling units per gross acre)
City Zoning Residential Use: R-4 (Maximum 4 dwelling units per net acre)
District Comprehensive Plan City of Renton Comprehensive Water&Sewer District Plan
District Franchise No franchise is required for service to the Perkins Area.
Urban Growth Area (UGA) The site is located within the Urban Growth Area as identified under
the State Growth Management Act, King County Comprehensive
Plan and City of Renton Comprehensive Plan
SEPA Declaration The proposed annexation is exempt from SEPA pursuant to RCW
43.21 C.222.
A �
ENTITIES/AGENCIES NOTIFIED:
King County Council Member(s) Reagan Dunn
King County: Clerk of Council, Department of Assessments, Fire Marshal, Health Division, State
Department of Ecology, Puget Sound Regional Council, Municipality of Metropolitan
Seattle (Metro)
Cities: Newcastle
Fire Districts: King County Fire Protection District No. 25; City of Renton Fire Department
Water Districts: City of Renton Water Utilities Department; Soos Creek Water and Sewer
District
Sewer Districts: City of Renton Sewer Utilities Department; Soos Creek Water and Sewer
District
School Districts: Renton School District No. 403
y��1''�+, � \ I .- ' �'sr ,� ,� o
._— � �„ . �t Y ��� � — 2'4" li' ���' T'_-----•+, d y �� �-:� � �.,� �r
b� '� � . t ��• i T�'�
�"" a�k'�'+.'!r, � I ,� `"',?� ��s. � ..'h°'t '', '� �".'�� �r�(�k ��'
'.�� ,, � .r'_ .,��
•
,�� `� � ��� ;1� �*^�'��� � 'r � ��'' � ��_ � '�,
� � � �_ � � � � � ��� � � + �,�'
:yR.' � '�,�. � I � `�, ��t�
th W .: � SE �5t�;h Vll,a � �
� W ��� - x� � Q� � �� �
.�
� � T: 1 � > ., 53 �`� A`�+-• �-
,�r,� i
,
�i�FN' I � .f� s� � - js. (� ��i�y' .�
rt ,. S,
� �� ��"F� ,+M►�,td e .. , A �
_.,,p�.� �� �' � . * � .v .� , � ; �Y',n \J�"� a y.
_ «iw __
�^E '"����' , �" ;Y '�`' i�i .. .. ` �,� .
��:— � t h �,�-/��`�:��� k;� �.� , ; 9�`
I ��_ �`��� � j,�' � � �� ��� � I
*i�"+��� � �. . 'r���t[ 1�`�� •:� �• �
I �,'. I �,;+�L<,���";`` , I �('� � i . a.<..
' � i
i
�� i � J
,.
. . .. �,. ", �
�.
.��,. � _ .� .,.,��f�:,.a_`�. , � � M�.����� �% �� � �
. ,
, `.' , � '
.�� � ...� . .. . �� � ,
<-, � � A
.. '�r: �— �,!� j +,�" "S ,F!.� � . � � __ ., �� � -�'.�� �c5 ✓��
'� . -�r
.. . �'. ,. '`"rrt' k .. ___ •
.
}
,,� Y_
.. .4 ..-. . • .
. �/.y a , . �„Y y 4 �,�y '-. ••; '� ts<•�. ;.
' � '�`Y �1. � , . � � ___—
� { . �.+t.,�'r �r7N�,,�+1y�y��,� .!.
�. _ � }. , �,.1... � ���.��it��'� � — ��'�• `
� . ,
� � 'Y 'Y � n�� �r!w'-.�R ���ry� ����+�A, ,�, � � �
'' ��� ��J j. '., � {,� �M � �t#�u.�:s� ,�✓ . .— � }.�� �+� �� x:.� A
J �`" .�yr (
. t#� i��, Y. �+k � .i'1` � i ,Ii I a1i�� �r
1 s+� �i���+ v'�,' � . � � ir�
����____��-�"yr-"�!' '�" "9[:'`� . . ——r � �s,
..a, ���1`Y. :� �'!�" ,�t � • .,� 4� �R'�����`, "�F^.
r- � I �
r':- �f.s��/l�'� tr�r.`# � . � � ..l �•
R `�'�r �.S ,� �w�,•t N'�� : t��°� :� � � I �
�i t"l,�, �+k, y� �..k �`:: ��c . � � + .w-. .I.
� , �
,.
. ti . .
'
�;.��1°C'�, � . ./ ��y �r� �..,"+rr� '.- .. � I � a
_
� , Y� ' 'Y�. s . .._.._._ _ .
. '
� .
� '� +if ���'�' `* � Q _- .
.,
. ., r �
� y �, w ,1�.` .i . 1 `14 . �� � 1 ' �'
_ �
� '�
+ �, �
, � �
~�_ �. � �
;� - , �.:},s� - - �,R
f
. ,
. � r ,.�;•.
.
,� ���� , � �
� � _
. _' � • ' '!.... , .� r � _' � ' k
. . Sp�"' �. . ..—�.,,�_-.-, . .. '. ,�i^,�•a
�
.�,�.,. ,r . .��7�� i �y -i. '.
r"t ?';� .,��r �} (n � +r,+
�` � �
,. . .��. � .
,..,�_ � - � y
��� ��. K r. .
r + �
' � � /�. t .— M1 -
_� _ . , � , � �'�-�.
��j � — _
�� � � � _ � � �
.�� .. �.�� �, r� �� _
. .
.
� �
r ..
, �. o
. . -
.
N� ►
. � nd _ - .
. - ,-- ,,: - �!:� �s
G =-
.
_
, �
. . � ,.
, � - , ����
� �� � � __ �� �. �
=j '`� � �' �
�* ' ...� .
. � : , � � , . �
, y � . �- ` . I � •
, �
.� —� , r _ :- 4
9 �
. ,
� n� -� ` �� ,.
. _ .
. � � - �
. � ,w. 1 �
, . — , .
� , _,__� . _ , ,
_ � .. . , ,
� � -
- ,
, '� . _ ;� ��_ �
. . , _ � � .
x � _ . .
� -� � r �� . � .� � �
" �,���� . _ N i � 1. ♦ .. �.
.,'��� �. . . « , f
+ i n
- f
� �+(�'r r /- 1
, .. . "� ;h1.J.: s . ' , '
. ,�# . ..,. ��.., .
, Q,. S x
.'k�. __ l
, � . . .
,r6����'� — � � � � '� • r
,. __ .. ,»� r
t�,.{��+ -- —
�, w
� ,
�,-"�}� _ � �'b'' . .. —
w • .
} . ; .
�
. � -
� . . .
�` `'�'�V ` .`' � � � ^"^-w�---� ' � � � i
- .t�C__..__ " , -.,. . ,w„ , : � .__ � . . _.
Proposed Perkins Annexation o 40o soo
Figure 2: Aerial Map
ti {, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning Annexation Area 1 . 4g00
��� Alex Pietuh,Adminisuator ��� City Limits
G.Del Rosario
L'NT ZO September 2(b5
Annexation Review Form
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
f�+�li� .. Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Perkins Annexation
Location : The proposed 15.09-acre rectangular shaped Perkins Annexation is
located along both sides of Union Avenue NE between NE 27`n,
Street, if extended, on the north and NE 26th Street, if extended, on
the south. If extended, its western boundary would be Queen
Avenue NE (128th Avenue SE), if extended, and its eastern
boundary would be approximately Vashion Avenue NE, if extended.
The site is located in Renton's Sewer and Water service areas.
Date Circulated: October 11, 2005 Comments Due: October 21, 2005
General Information
Area : 15.09 acre
Street length : 400 lineal feet
Assessed Value : $828,000
Estimated Population : 7 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 46 Residential Detached Units
Future Po ulation � 107 eo le
Reviewing Department/Division:
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
�v
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area? �
v
(Over)
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
�GS
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
1 c FS c„�l c���c��1 ,-1,c.��c��
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation?
�`�
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
/�
General recommendation and comments:
� �� � �--�-�1 Date: �� •a�� O �
Signature: �
. � . av.i�y�� �✓`�' �
�.` a
` OCT 1� 2005
Annexation Review Form Transportation Systems Div.
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Perkins Annexation
Location : The proposed 15.09-acre rectangular shaped Perkins Annexation is
located along both sides of Union Avenue NE between NE 27tn,
Street, if extended, on the north and NE 26�' Street, if extended, on
the south. If extended, its western boundary would be Queen
Avenue NE (128`h Avenue SE), if extended, and its eastern
boundary would be approximately Vashion Avenue NE, if extended.
The site is located in Renton's Sewer and Wat�r service areas.
Date Circulated: October 11, 2005 Comments Due: October 21. 2005
General Information
Area : 15.09 acre
Street length : 400 lineal feet
Assessed Value : $828,000
Estimated Population , : 7 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 46 Residential Detached Units
Future Po ulation � 107 eo le
Reviewing Departmen ivisio I Ya MSDorI �.�oh �Ys�Ghs
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
depa�tment/d ivision?
�t!9.
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or senrice provision
to the area? 1
�y�$�, �Z�fVa t,✓►d� ak� �aven�rr� i �n��KK�S �M �32 rc� I�VCK�c� .5� �NH�ah l��u�/
C� � y .� ���N gfaK����s. Por+���s �o � ���� ,�.��.� S� d� ��ti=�
ko wt�.��' C,fy o .L� (�
G�er�► ,tKT►« stslltW�F�,�M c1 �T►�'l".� l,l1 k�tMO, E�i.rrc,,.�1y � k1►t �.uM,'�r�Over)dw� IeCw�" d° KO'7
h�c�i�r�Ks �r I�P�ovtNtert� � r32Kc7�`�S��ukroh R��tN�'�� N����i� 132.hrlA�c �E
�n ver�
. . .•.'�'o C �y s�l�t,wT�� S��ivdf d�ee� �t-N�/ hE►✓ �o��� ��c�sJ S ��t-� �++��ii 7�'�e
` �.kK«ca.-�lre� s►tc�w�wr.! 6�e af �Ha rxpeKst o-�'e�is�frkJ pro p�r�-�, owhers �.K.t�ar �e�v c,�v�%���;.
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your �
department/division? f
}
�.
ye5, �
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? ;
Ad�d}�►��,�� fi�-�srRr�'z�'r� Sys�'c�s s'f"a�� u�c�.cld Ko'f' �P �e��w�vcc% G�P�►�ae��� :
132.Kd A✓�►��c� $E ttll�fi�k '{�G� akN�Xdfiah ��►Ga � �l't'y o� l�tnTr�� s�"andarclS� �,,,al
aMy new �o�al acccas s�-��ts u.���,�n �" rZNNt�1Cilft.wt_„, scf�� wou/df 6� af f!� exPehse
��CXIsTI k pr�Pcrtr owrqe�s �Nc� OV !7Cr� ciCVC�l�wltK 1, �er�r`yY catT� ��,scciaf�a�W 1�i y�W�
u�sr�cd`1s'fr�t.-1'irc� �wd �s�r ��oua-�"��t,u�f�t ��rr�`e�h�Mce �{p�ve�are�n7'n+7�lc,a �a�l sfi���f
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or man�g'�t1 5r��e �
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this $�C a�f • �
annexation? �
� ��YE'�' �� ahs�br �. �►ko►�.�a/ �
��5, T�� C�{-� wok ul �S�K�st ,5 P/i�s�v !r-� ��.leh.
l�t� ��wu.e 5�����t,�» �ic �h►,��c�'��oti avc�, ;GfJe�v +rs�.s�or'f''�+cok— r�(a .
a�v��«�cw+s o� �awt�cs�s wo�.�'iI K�f b.� v����`�►J.
6. Would altemate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.) �
�
�i(J,e h a vf Ko c.ok c.��-K.s �-��a vd r�� �'li.� �ok.,d a���s a,5 �
Gu��.evc�(y �o�-vPoS ecl. `
General recommendation and comments:
`�� �ra K s�ro�}��.o� Sysf'ew�s D�v�s�o� I�a s ko GOhGPVGtS �,u�zvd��
w!lne:���- -i-�,c pvo posed a-h n ex a-Frok does ar �lae►s tio�' o,�u v�,
F-
�K
C
`
Signature: Date: � �.� �—
�.�
,;
}
r
�
,
� . ,
Annexation Review Form
[X) 10°/a Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO :
�'`�"���� ^'� Surface Water Utility
` ire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Perkins Annexation
Location : The proposed 15.09-acre rectangular shaped Perkins Annexation is
located along both sides of Union Avenue NE between NE 27`n,
Street, if extended, on the north and NE 26th Street, if extended, on
the south. If extended, its western boundary would be Queen
Avenue NE (128th Avenue SE), if extended, and its eastern
boundary would be approximately Vashion Avenue NE, if extended.
The site is located in Renton's Sewer and Water service areas.
Date Circulated: October 11, 2005 Comments Due: October 21, 2005
General Information
Area : 15.09 acre
Street length : 400 lineal feet
Assessed Value : $828,000
Estimated Population : 7 people
Current Uses: ��N��Q
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units �,n �
Commercial : N/A ���' �
Industrial : N/A ��
Public : N/A OC� �D���S���
Comp Plan Designat�on . Residential Low Density 0�
Future Uses: : 46 Residential Detached Units gv��'
Future Po ulation � 107 eo le
Reviewing DepartmenUDivision: � y
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
departmenUdivision?
. �.S -- S7^��F"��'c �.�'�icGs
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
/V�'
(Over)
>., . ►
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
departmenUdivision?
�/v
4. What additional facilities or taff ould be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
�OLA� /��v/Ew�,� ¢ I�40�"rr�,2 s
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation?
U N�l
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
� �K
General recommendation and comments:
.� � ' .
�
Signatur ' Date: ,.J�i�/�
�
: � � �-05-00�
� C�Tl'O�REfVT��
��� 2 � ��Q�
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE RECEIVED
ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS �=�TY CLERK�s o�FiC�
UNDER RCW 35A.14.120
(Direct Petition Method)
�1 D%PETITION PERKINS ANNEXATION)
TO: THE CITY COiJNCIL OF SUBMITTED BY:�p�,��r't�q
THE CIT'Y OF RENTON ADDRESS: �. '� �-�`��
City Hall, c/o City Clerk �U. �
1055 South Grady Way PHONE: �3 ��, C�ba,g
Renton, WA 98055
The undersigned are the owners of properties representing not less than ten percent (10%) of the
assessed value of all property within the proposed annexation area which they desire to annex to
the City of Renton.
We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence
annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, of all or any part of the area
described below.
The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to
the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of
this petition.
The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days af�er the filing of this request
for a public meeting with the undersigned.
1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept, reject or
geographically modify the proposed annexation; '
2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a
proposed zoning regulation; and,
3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of a proportional
share of existing city indebtedness by the area to be a.nnexed.
This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the
signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one
Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which
cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention.
Peck Annexation Petition Page 1 of 2
. r •
Perkins Annexation � ,'
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she
is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes
herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names ofpetitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the
real estat�)
.�-�.� ��.: q�2 3 i3 z .�v�- s�- 0�}�3 C���11y
1. 9����- I.p� A�.R�s
GL�'��- �'��k�ti s '��NTOti� w� 9�as�
oT_�t-o �.ch�'`fa-� P�r Kin3 962 3 �3anclGt�S,� pc��0�" 11�- �1
2.
�j?�,,�",.,�, t�a. g�o s�j
' `�j-I��l�i- �in��' 9���9 i.3� v�S�
3. �1��3 o�a��v�-��
r�or� >4. I�r.�Prm�a /��r-,�� l�n� r-/�`'DS9 13.�� �4�
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Page 2 of 2
H:IDIVISION.SIP&TSIPLANNINGIANNEX110�o Notice of Intent(rev's).doc1DE
09/20/05
�."� .�i■►►.� -� :: �i�/►\�►��1�
E •• ;• ,
.. ���� �
' �'''�•� �■� r� •� -
' � � �� ,, � �:�
� ,- �► �
.� � - �!
_ � �i�� � o �� ■■
� � �
:■ ���a � d •..� �
•�.,.� ,.� � �Q��
� � ■r � . . �� -
. , �
I/11 �
►�
• r�i•■ ..
r� �
` � 11 '
., ,'1r■� . , ' ' �
.
' � � i 11 � � . ��E�
/ � ��� . //� : ` �. '��
. '• � • , �
' � / �',,, r��y- Ci��' � ' .
'
. ���/f',•�:: i�/r� � � ' ,
,:11�1� ���►�j r� � - �;���1��� � •�
� .'�:1���, .��/�►1�1 �/,��. - ���������.�. ���
�, � �����r � .► �i��i�� - - ��
� �
. �ii�.� � �p :... � E: , , �,,� �a�,
�i i.`7■ :►w■ � : �u�„� � �71�����:'�'y
� ` �I����ii ►-���'��Lu� .�ic' ,� .t� ■c� ■ .� ■ Rt�r►�,
�a �y ��� �� W���
� • �.���/� � -�. � '.���R� - ��� ��w1 ��_!�
� � � ��,:: c����� /�� �����:i►�������,���� ����isvu� � i
��j ����� � tE�� y C'�ti�JWl ��r��:i i�������� H ������ �
`�,��:I.. ` � � ���L�L�� I\1�����,�,� �% �, ��� •��i��i�i��n ��1
�r�•����i���: � � /III��ii�iii n�i��i�� �♦ � ��� :� ,� - i �
�. w, � �/� � �� ♦�r ���J����IA� �:� �
� �: : : :IC[ � �..
,�f� ;�. . � �E��c�������� � � �I��i�/►�►�LzuV�u �� ��
�, �� �� � �• ...� �������I ��: �� �A��►��i� .�i►� �i
�. r r � �� ���I������/� � �� r.,� � .,
� ��� �� � ; �► �,��JE!�iEf�E��/�� � �i !+� �
■ 1 . . .���u,��,a �C �� 11L1C�E�1� �ra����li
�'��►�, 11: : , : :' / ���� � '' �.. a� III��l��A�� ::iiiii
' '� � ' � t�� �--�-� � �1� �ii�`� �lsl i� m� II�LlIIJ� .,
� � . 1/I �•. ..�±. .., � ■_ � i� ��' 111111�,
�� �\\ �,� �i 111��,`�--,_, � �, !'..w��J1f:/7tA/!:�l� �� ���/; � � �I
�: �� /. �7; � ,����rr �����,����ju���� �+. •��►i� �11_ =
�..�� .,,.., 1� ���.`,���u :.. � ♦ . c� �Ir �. G�� —�
iY�1 ���� r � ��► R,s! �� r-► 1 � �
�� w ■ � � �f t��i1��1�� �I►�f;i :��'!l.� !�l��I\!�
'' ��ii�� �'.. � j =�� �,r�,t,�'''' ��� � �
/ �, ' � ���1� ti,li' �uV�,� �� �� �,��
� � "����• ;�►� :� �.��"' i�1�+����►���� • �/111/�f . :
/ v � �r �ir� �1�� ��;
I , � � � �� �►1��!(/L�1� � ., �:t�n���r
� �� �� ��' ��`�� � � � �I��„ 11L'rf1ll�il�/ � ''
� �� �� ��=�3 ����t��i� ., .111�� ��,������I������■■■■� � �
, ■ ��
- !- ��� ,�`� �� � �1
� �� .. . ��• . ...�: . � :: . � r� 7
� �3 N •. , ■ `,� J �� ■� �� _ ": ., �� �
y �� � ■ „-.r.r'�� m� - --, - �' ,
� �� %� �G1 � 1���i��III�+' ��ii � � - � /L�
,� C � �� i ..: � � � '
� �� �� _ � � � M i� �il�. : � �
■ J� „ d .� .�!�= � �� +� �� _
. � �I��� - .� .-- �, . -
G . Io .� .1./.����!� �I� .. � ..� ���
. ..i_�■rl. _. ___.-.
' • • • - • ' - � - . •
1 : 11 . 11 �
• , . , . ., , ,. ... �� �� i
� � ' ' . 11 �
�
. , '��
Rentonnet Plat Index Search . . �:
Exhibit 2 — Lega� Desc'ri�jpxions
� , � ,
Lega! Description -,�ccount Numh�r: t}4230�91�20�
042305142
N 1/2 OF FOLG E 1/2 OF NE 1/4
LESS S 1320 FT LESS E 190 FT OF N
300 FT 8�LESS CO RD SUBJ TO TRAN
LN R/W ESMT
��., ��� �����
�
�
httU:/hentorulet.or�/internetann.�/KrA/in�iPX �fi„�fi,�Pa�t;�„_�h�.x��PR��A.A-1 nn��nilnnc
. ' Rentonnet Plat Index Search Page 1 of 1
. , , , � ' ^� ' �
Legal Description -Accc►un# Number: 0423Q5311�i�8
042305 114
PP ACT 39913397 MOBILE HOME
S 292 FT OF N 300 FT OF E 190 FT
OF NE 1/4 LESS CO RD
�1��`��"'�'�"�T�'�e� �°��'���.+I'i'{�4(i�
,
ItY�17'IITP,flt(17111P.t [)T�It1ltPTtIPfAT111cIK�A�ir�r�vv rfm7�,��o�r�f�;.,r.—�1,.,,,.1,.,.�..1 O_7�-1 nninn/lilnc
Rentonnet Plat Index Search Page 1 of 1' � , � .
,
_, _ __ _� � ._ .. .,_
11� � ' I ► •
Legal Descript3on -Account 1�umber: 4323059956D8
032305 156
S 120 FT OF N 384 FT OF W
211.5 FT OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 LESS ` `
CO RD LESS C/M RGTS
� �•S ��s�r�����,�r�,�
�
httTl'I�TP.IIt(11111P.t hTQI171YPrilPtAt111cITtrA/ir�r'�av �frr�74�„�o.,n4;n.�.—.,1....,.1,,,",1 D_7�—1 � --� nnrnninnne
�
� , �.
_.__.__ __....____
Annexation Review Form
OCT 1 2 2005
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Anr�exation Petition
; _._.__
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire �$ Water Ufiiity
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Perkins Annexation
Location : The proposed 15.09-acre rectangular shaped Perkins Annexation is
located along both sides of Union Avenue NE between NE 27`n,
Street, if extended, on the north and NE 26'h Street, if extended, on
the south. If extended, its western boundary would be Queen
Avenue NE (128th Avenue SE), if extended, and its eastern
boundary would be approximately Vashion Avenue NE, if extended.
The site is located in Renton's Sewer and Water service areas.
Date Circulated: October 11, 2005 Comments Due: October 21, 2005
General Information
Area : 15.09 acre
Street length : 400 lineal feet
Assessed Value : $828,000
Estimated Population : 7 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 46 Residential Detached Units
Future Po ulation � 107 eo le
Reviewing Department/Division: �i C '�
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division? �
. �� �
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area? �
4
(Over)
t
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
V,� 5�
j
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
�V/�
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation? ` 1�
/�)
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
,�t,1 /�
General recommendation and comments:
�� � ����
Signature: �� � Date: � � � /
\,
. ,
' ' - �-05-00�
�
� GilY O�RElVT��
��� 2 � ��0�
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE RECEIV�D
A,NNEXATION PROCEEDINGS r.-1TY CLERK�s o�Fic�
UNDER RCW 35A.14.120
(Direct Petition Method)
�10%PETITION PERKINS ANNEXATIDN)
TO: THE CITY COITNCIL OF SUBMITTED BY:�p�v�,�.en�c�
THE CIT'Y OF RENTON ADDRESS: �. ^ �-�`��
City Hall, c/o City Clerk �U. �
1055 South Grady Way pgp�; �� �� C�b�,c�
Renton, WA 98055
The undersigned are the owners of properties representing not less than ten percent (10%) of the
assessed value of all property within the proposed annexation area which they desire to annex to
the City of Renton.
We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence
annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, of all or any part of the area
described below.
The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to
the City of Renton. A map (E�chibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of
this petition.
The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request
for a public meeting with the undersigned.
1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept, reject or
geographically modify the proposed annexation; '
2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a
proposed zoning regulation; and,
3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of a proportional
share of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed.
This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the
signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one
Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which
cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention.
Peck Annexation Petition Page 1 of 2
Perkins Annexation � . , �
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she
- is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes
herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names ofpetitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the
real estate.)
.��,.� _.`-�.: q�2 3 i3 z. ,�v� sf 0�}�3 C���lty
1. 9�z✓�os- I.p� ��R,�s
�1.�'��►- �'�Kkiti s ���''°ti� w� 9�Qs7
o�_�i-d �.c��-Yfa.�t f��r Kin3 9��3 1,�analG��..G S,� (�c}23��' Il�- 1►
2.
�'� ' �?c,�.,,�� �Ja, q�o s`j
3. ��"�3, `���l'i- �r��!� 9G�9 i3� v�� 4�}a3v�-�r1�-
r�io� ,�. I�r.�Prrr� �P��� l�a� �!�'DS9 13.�}� 741C,P,f�
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Page 2 of 2
H:\DIVISION.SIP&TS�PLANNINGWNNEX�10%Notice of intent(rev's).doc�DE
09l20/05
���, �, ����, -� :: ■ %►��►\\1'
�
•. ..
�1����'� �,, � . .
■��II� ��J�� � ►�� �
� � :� �� e :i� �
, � �.► � � � ,. .
��, ����� �
� o .��
. _ � � �' � � �. ■
:■ ���a � a ...�� �
,�..� ..� , , r� �Q� ._______
� � ■� �\
. �. ►I
111 �
►�
•� r�i•■ ..
i� � ,
, � t, ■A • •
.., W.?l1� � • ' �
� � � � ,
�//11 ' �„ � . � ��E�
� � ��� , ■ . �t'; �
, /� , , �
� . �
� . ��/�I � ��� � '_', . �
� � � �
,�11�1■ ��'��'��■■:: �i�� _ �.�..�� .1.� .
� � �►��� +� � - �i�11�111�= �
��!�.���, .•���r1�i ,�1,1�• _ ���Ui���.�. ���
�, � ��i��r � ► �i��►�� - � �=-�'
��� .:. �az� �
. I � = �� ���� . :� �,,� � . �
�I �I'�'�I� i►�� � . �ud;,�� �' J71�I����w��
� ` ����i: �i u� � ,� •� ■4 ■ � ■ rtr��►�
�a �r� ��� �� Wp��'
��A ; ����/, c�r ! ' � %1�i11' �" � :, ____.�
,, �� c�i � . /. �R��r��i� ii��i���u� ■...■
. �� ���/j � %�� ��esu�Wi ������� ��������� �
.'� ,.� � � NII�1�l1��� _ �
�•���j I�� �� r��-�- � �����'t0� �,�!/�1!!t,�,� �%� �� i�� ��'J!'�[�iiL°r1'/ �ri
�I-��i,����• ": � /IIl�iiiii nii�eiaR: i i ��: :� ,�� -� ��
� w, � ��� �� �� ♦�r �11�!/�l�IA� �:� �
�f�'� -��-�.i ,�'-,�� : �ICC�E• � ,� '..� ��♦ ♦� �►�LL��►�u �► ♦
�' �� � � ��[1��,��//.. .. , ► .� ►1
� �:• �� i � � �/�I����/��� �i7�v�j��ii r'�;i II������iw �►� �1
� '�, L ��� ■= = �. �� ��l��iE[�EY���� � �':��'a ii a: 11LIClE[�1� �r�C��.Ai
��..
, " � ��� � , . r., � ���� �� � m�'�!1'41 �� �■ ������A� �ii��ii
� � �� :7 �� ■ � �
� �i �1/ ' �� ii�: •� � �� ��� W3l31' a� �'a� �LlIIJL�� ,
� .- � ■_ .—� �� � 111111�.
�� r� �� :�I�M � � g��I�r�ntn�r.r�� �� ��Ir� � : �)
�_ �� I�. �l; � ,����rr: � I�tv►���j����� �+. •��►i,: �11 �
�-.r► ... �r ��i.`Q�;.� :�. � ♦ . �� �Ir •. G/" -I
�� iY�� .��� r � ��� �s! �� r-� 1 �' ��
w ■ � � �f �t�•1����� �:���f����P�!l.� !l111►l=
'' �•� � =� � �I`� �� ` �: �
'' ■ ii/i�i �' ' � ■ � �♦r , �� � ����� � :
� ■ �1�/I�'! ;� ����� �l1�uN11��! �� ��
. ������!�'s. � :.�. •.+►�,�.��.�.•�.�,�,�r����• �,'��
� 1 �► r ■. �u��;r��.�� • ., �t���..
�� �� �� �.e� ��`1� � . ■ ����� IIL'�l/ll�i1�� � "
�� I�� �(��3 ����t�jj� ., .111�� �������/1������■..■�. � �
�. �,�`~ �t , ■ ■
.. , . � � � � r�
� �� .. • ` . ■;•;� . � � _ — � 7
a �� .. •. ■ .!— •, •� ,,,r� �, ; " / ■
y �� � ■ „-�,.rl� ���� - --� - � I
� �� ii ' �� �' �,����ur�' „" � � - � .rL�
,,"''�' � 3 �� i � ::� � � ,
� �� �� _ � � � Mio �il.. � � �
, J� „ d .� .��!�= � \` +� ,/� .
. � �/��� - .� .-- �, ; .
� . lo .� .,...������ �I\ � � .� ���
.�_�.ri. _.. ___._.
' • • • - • ' - � - . •
1 : 11 . 11 �
• , . � .� �. � .� .�� �� .� �
� �� ' .' • 11 �
,
, , ......_...
.� , '„
� Rentonnet Plat Index Search Exhibit Z — Lega� Desc�-iptions�
��
- ._ . ..,.� , a•.,. . ^� .a .``_,k _. =�.._ ,,,. �
I
, + � 7p li . �� � � � ' i.�� '
I�
IA
Lega! Description -Accoun# Numbsr: 042345914204
042305142
N 1/2 OF FOLG E 1/2 OF NE 1/4
LESS S 1320 FT LESS E 190 FT OF N
300 FT& LESS CO RD SUBJ TO TRAN
LN RNV ESMT
� '�" ����`
�
http://rentonnet.ar�/internetanns/K('A/;,,�PX rtFrn?fiicPa�tinn—ehnzz�lA.'�1R,7�—t nni�ni�nnc
.
, �Zentonne�Plat Index Search Page 1 of 1
.
� s :� � � ,
Legat Description -Account Number: 042305911448
042305114
PP ACT 39913397 MOBILE HOME
S 292 FT OF N 300 FT OF E 190 FT
OF NE 1/4 LESS CO RD
' �Y;�i�Y�!#�� -w � !
s
httn•//rentnnnPt nra/intPrnata,,,,�/Tt('A/;t,.iA�. ��„9�,�o.,,.t;,.,,—�1.,...,t..,.,.t o_n—� nn�nn��nnc
Rentonnet Plat Index Search �'�
Page 1 of 1'' � .
. ,
_�. ,_ - - �--- -- - ��._ , ..._
� �'.� �� ' * � �
Legal Description -dccount Rlumber: 0323059956t?8
032305156
S 120 FT OF N 384 FT OF W
211.5 FT OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 �ESS
CO RD LESS C/M RGTS
�' � ��`�'�����-4��
�
httn'//rPntnnnPt nro/intPrnPtannc/�(''A/;.,.�p,. �fi�„�fi,�o.,,.t;.,,,—..1.,.,..1,,,.,.1 O l)-1 nn�nninnnc
,.
, . RECE�V��
. . . .
� ACT � ? 200�
�ITY OF REIVTO�= Annexation Review Form
�Tr�i�r svs���a�
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Wate�Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Perkins Annexation
Location : The proposed 15.09-acre rectangular shaped Perkins Annexation is
located along both sides of Union Avenue NE between NE 27`n,
Street, if extended, on the north and NE 26th Street, if extended, on
the south. If extended, its western boundary would be Queen
Avenue NE (128�h Avenue SE), if extended, and its eastern
boundary would be approximately Vashion Avenue NE, if extended.
The site is located in Renton's Sewer and Water service areas.
Date Circulated: October 11, 2005 Comments Due: October 21, 2005
General Information
Area : 15.09 acre
Street length : 400 lineal feet
Assessed Value : $828,000
Estimated Population : 7 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 46 Residential Detached Units
Future Po ulation � 107 eo e
Reviewing DepartmenUDivision: ��/ "��G � � �� ' � �
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
SCE �'�� �°
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
(Over)
r , '
, r
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
� �
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
�
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation?
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
General recommendation and comments:
/ �� ��
S�
u✓ C� �"V I a tg p S"
Signature: ��� �TV Date: � �
� ;• ' •
Attachment to Annexation Review Form
For Proposed Perkins Annexation—10%Notice of Intent
Reviewing Department: Water Utility Engineering
by Abdoul Gafour (x7210)
October 14,2005
1. Does the annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?
No. The proposed annexation is within the City of Renton's water service area.
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the
area?
No. There is an existing 12-inch water in Union Avenue NE,the line ends at NE 27"'Place and it can
deliver a maximum flow rate of 2,500 gallons per minute.
3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
Yes,the proposed annexation is within the City of Renton's water service area.
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this enlarged area? Can you identify
any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
Developer's extensions of water mains will be required to provide water for fire protection and far
domestic use for development within the annexation area.
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation?
The existing water line in Union Ave NE is currently owned and operated by the City of Renton.
City of Renton has a current franchise with King County for the operation and maintenance of City's wate
lines within King County's rights-of-way.
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the attached map.)
Water service boundaries are established by existing coordinated water system plan and comprehensive
water system plans.
General recommendation and comments:
None.
Signature: Q� Date: October 14, 2005
Abdoul Gafour
Water Utility Supervisor
H:�File Sys\WTR-Drinking Water Utility\WTR-03-Correspondence\Perkins-annexation-10°/a.101405.doc
v
- � ����V�'�
�s u� ' � , �o�
`� Annexation Review Form
�:ITY GF REN7'O�
t�T!!_IT��SYS?�rti7
[X] 10% Notice o�intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility /�
Parks V1lastewater Utility r
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Perkins Annexation
Location : The proposed 15.09-acre rectangular shaped Perkins Annexation is
located along both sides of Union Avenue NE between NE 27tn.
Street, if extended, on the north and NE 26`h Street, if extended, on
the south. If extended, its western boundary would be Queen
Avenue NE (128th Avenue SE), if extended, and its eastern
boundary would be approximately Vashion Avenue NE, if extended.
The site is located in Renton's Sewer and Water service areas.
Date Circulated: October 11, 2005 Comments Due: October 21, 2005
General Information
Area : 15.09 acre
Street length : 400 lineal feet
Assessed Value : $828,000
Estimated Population : 7 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 46 Residential Detached Units
Future Po ulation • 107 eo le
Reviewing Department/Division: L��v���J��;�T�
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division? ��a� ��'��"�-�Y � �U,� �l- 'E;��fZ ����1� /'��2�
2. Are you aware of an problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area? /�� ��
`1� d
(Over)
.�
�
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
departmenUdivision? ���'� `� ��,��1 T-y��S G�����✓Gc����
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this �rea? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? /�f� L,�a,
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation? �� �,
/
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
�'�� �� -��- j� �1'�oL- ��+�-� -� bv�" �►�tT7�
�-- w� ��s ��-�--�1
General recommendation and comments: �
�� � /
� �����
.
Signat�r�;-;��, f���7��=�v�l Date: - !� "`�
� Fr ,
Annexation Review Form
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police %� Transportation
Public Works Maintenance � Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Perkins Annexation
Location : The proposed 15.09-acre rectangular shaped Perkins Annexation is
located along both sides of Union Avenue NE between NE 27tn,
Street, if extended, on the north and NE 26`h Street, if extended, on
the south. If extended, its western boundary would be Queen
Avenue NE (128�'Avenue SE), if extended, and its eastern
boundary would be approximately Vashion Avenue NE, if extended.
The site is located in Renton's Sewer and Water service areas.
Date Circulated: October 11, 2005 Comments Due: October 21, 2005
General Information
Area : 15.09 acre
Street length : 400 lineal feet
Assessed Value : $828,000
Estimated Population : 7 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : 46 Residential Detached Units
Future Po ulation � 107 eo le
Reviewing Department/Division: V''�l�- Wll2�s_�t.�til,t�'tit�it.G�
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
departmenUdivision?
' /V �
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
rV v
(Over)
� � ,
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
departmenUdivision?
��
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
/�� . /��
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation?
N �
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services?
(If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
,U v
General recommendation and comments:
. �
Signature: t,�t/ Date: f 0 ��' Q
�
�ti`sY o� CITY OF RENTON
♦ � '� ♦ Mayor
Kathy Keolker
���N���
ctober 27,2006
State of Washington
Boundary Review Board for King County
Yesler Building
400 Yesler Way,Room 402
Seattle,WA 98104
Subject: NOTICE OF INTENTION TO EXPAND THE CITY OF RENTON
CORPORATE LIMITS BY ANNEXATION
Dear Board Members:
As required by Chapter 36.93 of the RevisedlCode of Washington (RCW), the City of Ren*�n
hereby gives notice of intention to annex tenitory hereafter referred to as the "Perkins
Annexation." This annexation is proposed under the 60% Direct Petition method in accordance
with the applicable provisions of Chapter 35A.14 of the RCW. This annexation would
incorporate into the City of Renton approximately 15.47 acres of territory for the provision of
urban services.
To assist in your consideration of the proposed action, the required articles and exhibits are
enclosed and numbered in accordance with the Board's suggested format. The $50.00 filing fee
is also enclosed.
Should questions arise during the review of the information and exhibits provided with this
Notice of Intention to Annex, please feel free to contact Don Erickson, Senior Planner, at (425)
430-6581.
Please send notices and other communications regarding the proposed annexation to:
Don Erickson,AICP, Senior Planner
Department of Economic Development,
Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning
City of Renton
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton,WA 98055
T'hank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
l��c�..,
Kathy Keolker
Mayor
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98057-(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 R E N T O N
/!� AHEAD OF THE CURVE
PIr7 r�,��..�..e.,.....o-,�....cnw_.e..,...iva....,���.,�znoi....��,........�..,,,�