HomeMy WebLinkAboutCED Planning File �i .
. � • �
Liberty Annexation � ��L� �o
�
Units Population AV � � �
Existin dev. 211 485 $83,576,100 f .,�
Full dev. 268 616 $114,926,100 � l.�-
Assumptions: 2.3 persons/new SF household
$396,100 AV/existing unit(including mobile homes)
$500,000 AV/new SF home
R�venu�s::::: :: :: Total revenues
Existin Full Rate Existing:I $33E};952.:65::
Re ular lev $241,033 $331,447 2.884 Full!; $44��03:�7;
Excess levy $5,225 $7,185 0.06252
State shared revenues
Rate (per cap) Existin Full
Liquortax $3.23 $1,565.43 $1,988.26
Liquor Board profits $7.31 $3,546.77 $4,504.76
Gas tax- unrestricted $14.14 $6,857.88 $8,710.21
MVET $0.19 $89.94 $114.24
Camper excise $0.75 $363.75 $462.00
Criminal �ustice $0.73 $355.10 $451.02
Total $12,778.87 $16,230.48
Miscellaneous revenues
Rate Existin Full
Real estate excise* $75.35 $36,544.07 $46,414.73
Utilit tax"" $133.20 $28,105.20 $35,697.60 I don'tthink I pro�
Fines&forfeits" $14.98 $7,265.87 $9,228.40
Total $71,915.13 $91,340.73
* Per capita
** Per housing unit- based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate
��stS Total ongoing costs
Per capita Existin Full Existing; $285,336:03'.
Contracted Services Full $376,107:8�i
>. . ,
Alcohol $0.19 $92.15 $117.04
Public Defender $4.68 $2,269.80 $2,882.88
Jail $8.56 $4,151.60 $5,272.96
Subtotal $6,513.55 $8,272.88
Court/legal/admin. $66.92 $32,456.20 $41,222.72
Parks maintenance" $14.90 $7,226.50 $9,178.40
Police $276.89 $134,291.65 $170,564.24
Road maintenance"* N/A $438.00 $3,212
Fire*** $1.25 $104,470.13 $143,657.63
Total $285,396.03 $376,107.87
*See Sheet Parks FIA
** See Sheet Roads FIA
*"* Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract)
Net fiscal impact
Existing $45i556;s63
Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA): Full:.... $70,095;4Q
Other one-time costs:
Parks acquisition % development(from Parks Sheet) Total one-time costs: i:i:i:;: ',$.2.30;262:4i1:
Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo
w
. . •
vide this last year since it is based on housing unit. I don't have the information.
Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo
— ��� � . ��,�� �� ������ .
� .� . �
.. '� `
� � - e Mayor
Kathy Keolker
������ , . .
January 31,2007 � . �
State.of Washington . _
. Bounda.ry Review Board for King County� ' � - .
Yesler Buildirig . �
400`Yesler Way,Roozn 402. ' .
Seattle,WA'98.104 . , ;
Subject: NOTICE OF INTENTION. TO EXPAND THE CITY OF R�NTON
� . CORPORATE LIIVIITS BY ANNEXATION � .
Dear Board Members: , : .
- As required.by Chapter 36.93 of tfie Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the City,o#'Renton . _
� 'hereby.giyes notice of intention to annex territory hereafter, referred to as the, "Aster Park .
. , ,,,
: . � . Annexation:" This annexation.is proposed under,the-60% Direc.t Petition method in accordance . � ,
with the:applicable provisioris� of :Chapter 35A.14. :of the RCW. This annexation would '.. �
� incorporate into the City.of Reriton`:approximately 19.8,'S.;acres of territo .ry for.the provision of• �;.
� urban services. � - , _.
. To assist:in� your consideration of the proposed_ action; the required artieles and exhibits..are :
enclosed and.numbered in accordance with the Board's'suggested format. The $50.00 filing fee - . ; ."
_ "is also enclosed. .
Sl�ould questions arise.during the review of- the:'information and exhibits pro.vided with this
..
Notice of Intention to Annex,please'feel free to contact Don.Erickson, Senior Planner; at (42"5)
430-6581: .
_ Please send notices and other coinmunications regarding the proposed annexation to: :
Don Erickson;AICP;Senior Plariner
Deparhnent of Economic Development;, '
. Neighborhoods arid Strategic Planning �
_ . . Ci'ty of Renton ; �
1055 S..Grady�Vay
Renton,WA 980'S5 , .. , " �
� . - Thank you for your consideratiori.'
Sincerely, ' , ,
�� _ �� /�r-°��'�:� _ . .
,, . Kathy'Keolker . - : . . . - .
; ', . �Mayor . - ' .; , � �
, � •. .`i
.
.
, , : ,
. i
, , . . ' . = . - - - ..
. " ;
, , " " . '. i
1055�South Grady Way-Renton,Washingfon.98057-(425)430-6500/�FAX(425)430-6523 � � � � �"� _ '
' � . - . � �-- . . _ �--- - - �� - - ---- - .. - � , A�FIEAD� O�F� T�HE �CUR.V.E�� . ' . .
<:.
U.S:.BANK OF WASHINGTON ` 19_10 �
... _ , : . :
�� � ;. ����� . ;:� ��.� � � RENTONBRANCH �•f� �-- '�� 1250�, _
� , � . �
�,`S� O� CITY OF RENT�N a�.�� ����� � ��� � 4s�� �;� ��°�� -�s
N>
°**********
� � t8 �
ACCQUNTS PAYABLE : f7�41946 `01/26/2007 256505' 50 00"
4 � _ � � `�' 1055�5 GRADY WAY .
RENTON,WA 98055 : ` ` "
��� ��� � Phone:(425).430 6918. � °� - :`, �
� � �'N�� � ` �` � ° ` -
� � Fax.(425)430-6855 ,.��� �� . � �
` ,;:. . ,». ; . . . : ,
�VOID AFT�R 6 MONTHS
` PAY�.'- F'ifty �ollars`and No Cents
PAY STATE OFUVASHINGTON BOIJNDARY ��, (�, ,r, � ' �,
, _.
� To T"E � � �REVIEW BOARD'FOf�.KING.COUNTY � -= �� . ;��,v_�_ . , `� J � ��n�YOR��,
. �; �
oRoeR ' 400 YESLER V1%AY'-STE 402 � ti�� ��, �
�EATT�.E, V1%A 98104 '_ ' '
�oF �� � �
,. : . `.
..
- , ,..
: ,FINA:CE&IS AdMINISTRATOR;'-
� ,
� � n',Q2�56`�.50�5'if■ �..L�2�50:OO��L:0��5�s .��.53�5,00.6_9.� 3:�L�Bu!� � �
PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING
CITY OF RENTON,WA 98055 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK N0.256505
��,,, � � ..<.,,� �: � �-��
, ,�� .._ „,.
:.
R>.�.Se � .3 �.w�,A �.� ,,, i..3£� .......�' 3 _�;� ,.� - �.., mk�'�'� i.^� a .� �p�r�'� �
�, � ..
�
�
.�.
FilingFee 01l17/2007 Aster Park Annexation Filing Fee 0.00 50.00
50.00
-� Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
Yesler Building,Room 402,400 Yesler Way,Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: (206)296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://www.metrokc.gov/annexations
February 5, 2007
City of Renton '
Attn: Don Erickson, AIC
Senior Planner
1055 Sa�ath Grady Way
� Renton, WA 98055
RE: SUMMARY
File No. 2252 - City of Renton- Aster Park Annexation
Dear Mr. Erickson:
Ericlosed is the Summary prepared by Boundary Review Board staff for the above-referenced
Notice of Intention. The Summary will be sent to the Boundary Review Board members, along
with the Notice of Intention, as part of the agenda packet for the next regular monthly Board
meeting. �
If you see any corrections or clarifications which should be inade in the Summary, I would
appreciate hearing from you at (206) 296-6801.
Sincerely,
��
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Enclosure: Summary
cc: City of Renton, Attn:-Marty Wine, Assistant Chief of Administration
FOR . . ' . �.
,. M 11` ,
�"� .. ' �
" i "
SUMMARY
FILE N0. 2252 Thomas Guide Map No. 626
Date Received: 02/02/07
Date Distributed: 02/05/07
ENTITY City of Renton
Date Filed:
ACTION Petition for Land Annexation
Expiration 45 Days: 03/19/07
TITLE Aster Park Annexation � /I'Y� �/
Board Meeting: 03/15/07 �
Location The site is located on the eastern side of the ity of Renton. The
western boundary of the site (Ilwaco Avenue� abuts the eastern
boundary of the existing City of Renton. A portion of the northern
boundary of the site (NE Sunset Boulevard) also is contiguous with
the City of Renton. The ,s outhern boundary of the site is generall�
formed by SE 112th Placer The eastern bo dary is formed by 148
Avenue SE. �,. ��j�G��l'
Land Area Approximately 19.85 acres ��
Land Use , Current: 41 single family dwelling units; 28 mobile homes
Future: Approximately 62 single family dwelling units
Population Current: Approximately 94 persons
Future: Approximately 143 persons.
Assessed Valuation Current: $16,132,500
Future: Approximately$26,632,500
County Co�nprehensive
Plan Designation Urban Residential Use—Medium Density
County Zoning R-4— R-12 (4- 12 dwelling per gross acre);
R-48 (48 dwelling units per acre—mobile home park)
City Comprehensive Plan Residential Use—Low Density
City Zoning Residential Use: R-4 (Maximum 4 dwelling units per net acre)
District Comprehensive Plan City of Renton Comprehensive Water& Sewer District Plan
District Franchise No franchise is required for service to the Aster Park Area.
Urban Growth Area (UGA) The site is located within the Urban Growth Area as identified under
the State Growth Management Act, King County Comprehensive
Plan and City of Renton Comprehensive Plan
SEPA Declaration The proposed annexation is exempt from SEPA pursuant to RCW
43.21 C.222.
.,�:�. _ - - . '�. � ;
SUMMARY (File No. 2252)
The City of Renton proposes the annexation of approximately 19.85 acres, known as the Aster Park -
Annexation. � This annexation was proposed under the 60% petition method, pursuant to RCW
35A.14. Renton City Council adopted the petition for annexation in November of 2006.
The site is located on the eastern side of the City of Renton. The western boundary of the site (Ilwaco
Avenue) abuts the eastern boundary of the existing City of Renton. A portion of the northern boundary
of the site (NE Sunset Boulevard) also is contiguous with the City of Renton. The southern boundary
of the site is generally formed by SE 112th Place. The eastern boundary is formed by 148t" Avenue
SE.
The unincorporated area is included in the "Annexation Element°. of the City of Renton
Comprehensive Plan and is located within the Renton Potential Annexation Area. The proposed
action is consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies addressing annexation, including
those provisions which call for inclusion of urban areas within the City together with protection of and
provision of services to incorporated areas (e.g., LU-1; LU 37.3; LU-37.5; LU-36; LU-41, and LU-42).
The Aster Park property owners are seeking annexation in order to.develop properties under City of
Renton regulations and to receive public services (e.g., sewer services) from Renton. Presently the
area includes approximately 41 single family residential dwellings and a mobile home park. The City of
Renton proposes residential zoning at R-4(maximum 4 dwelling units per net acre) in order to achieve �
urban densities and efficiencies consistent with adopted Countywide goals and City policies for urban
� growth. In the City of Renton, at full development; Aster Park would include a total of approximately
62 single-family homes which would house approximately 143 persons. The new single-family homes
would.replace the mobile homes at this site.
The City of Renton has planned for growth at this level of urban density and has established
standards to guide ongoing uses and new development on the Aster Park properties following .
annexation. More specifically, the City of Renton is'prepared to provide development review based
upon local standards and applicable King County guidelines. Similarly, the City will provide
environmental review to the annexation area based upon local, regional and state regulations for_
protection of environmentally sensitive areas (e.g., sloped terrain, vegetated areas).
The City of Renton can directly provide (or contract for) urban services to the area. For example,
� upon annexation, the City will provide the Aster Park Area with police services, fire protection services
and emergency medical services. The City will also esfablish storm water management system
requirements for the Aster Park Area. King County Water District No. 90 will continue tb provide water
service to the Aster Park Annexation Area. The City of Renton Sewer Utilities Department will provide
sewer services to the Aster Park Annexation Area.
City and County library facilities, law and justice facilities, and parks and recreation facilities (slated for
im�rovements) would be available to the community. Children would continue to attend schools in
Renton School District No. 403.
The City of Renton reports that the proposed annexation conforms to the State Growth
Management Act (RCW 36.70A.) For example, the annexation is supported by RCW 36.70.20,
which requires community planning .goals, for urban growth, services and infrastructure, and
environmental preservation. Additionally, the application reportedly is consistent with RCW
36.70A.020 (1), encouraging development in urban areas where there are adequate public
services. It is also consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (12), which calls for public services to
support permitfed development. Annexation would also permit urban growth — and protection of
� environmentally sensitive areas —as envisioned in the Growth Management Act.
�- �
T.:.�, �'�.. � � ' ' ,
Further, the Aster Park Annexation is reported to be consistent with the King County
Comprehensive Plan. Following are examples of King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide
Planning Policies that are addressed by the proposed Aster Park Annexation:
FW-13:Cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to Urban Areas.
LU-31: The County should identify urban development areas within the Urban Growth Area.
LU-32: The County should encourage cities to annex territory within their designated potential
annexation area.
LU-33: Land within a city's potential annexation area shall be developed according to local and
regional growth phasing plans.
U-203: Population growth should be encouraged in Urban Growth Areas.
U-204: The County should support annexations that are consistent with Countywide Planning Policies
and the State Growth Management Act.
U-208: Land capacity shall be provided for residential, commercial and industrial growth.
U-304: Growth should be focused within city boundaries.
The proposed Aster Park Annexation is reportedly consistent with the provisions of RCW 36.93
(Boundary Review Board Regulations). For example, this annexation would be consistent with
Objective 1, which calls for the preservation of neighborhoods. This area is linked to Renton by
� geographic features social fabric (e.g., similar land uses, open spaces, common terrain features).
Similarly, the annexation would be consistent with Objective 2, which calls for the use of physical
boundaries to demarcate an annexation area. For the Aster Park Area, boundaries are primarily
formed by roadways and by existing City boundaries.
The Aster Park Annexation would aiso be consistent with Objective 3, which calls for creation of
logical service areas. Local residents have petitioned for annexation in order that all services and land
use regulations affecting their area may be efficiently coordinated by a single local government unit.
The City of Renton is prepared to govern and serve the area.
The proposed annexation is also reportedly consistent with Objectives 4-7, which call for the
achievement of reasonable boundaries for a jurisdiction. While the proposed annexation is small in
size, the area lies within the Renton PAA and so this incorporation is consistent with City plans to
govern and serve the area. This annexation would also be consistent with Objective 8, which calls for
inclusion of urban areas within municipalities. �����,� ��� z`�� .
The City of Renton has conducted fiscal analyses r ated to the propc�sed Aster Park Annexation. At
present levels of development, City expenditures e estimated at$72,749; revenues are estimated at
$75,278. At full development, City expenditures re estimated at 89,719; revenues are estimated at
108,804. The City will experience a modest ��,s—(��3�-at present development; the City will
experience a net gain of approximately$ at full development. �
r`����
As such, City officials report that the jurisdiction will have sufficient resources to serve the area without
a significant impact with respect to cost and adequacy of services, finances, debt structure, or rights
of other governmental units. For the present and the future, property owners will assume their share
of the regular and special levy rate of the City for capital facilities and public services. Future capital
needs and costs will be examined and funded through the Renton Capital Investment Program.
The City of Renton supports this annexation in order to serve citizens of the area. New residential
development and coordinated services would benefit the greater Renton community.
o �.; . • �
ENTITIES/AGENCIES NOTIFIED:
King County Council Member(s) Reagan Dunn
King County: Clerk of Council, Department of Assessments, Fire Marshal, Health Division, Stafe
Department of Ecology, Puget Sound Regional Council, Municipality of Metropolitan
Seattle (Metro)
Cities: Newcastle
Fire Districts: East Side Fire & Rescue District No. 10; City of Renton Fire Department
Water Districts: King County Water District No. 90; City of Renton Water Utilities Department
Sewer Districts: City of Renton Sewer Utilities Department
School Districts: Renton School District No. 403
-�rl�,
10415 — 147`�' Avenue SE
. . Renton, WA 98059
March 25, 2007
Rebecca Lind, Planner
City of Renton �
1055 S. Grady Way �������`'''���" T�
'- �,��= ' :
Renton, WA 98055 }
�i�n� 2 � °�;������ �
�
RE: Aster Park Annexation 6
ECONOMIC DEVELOP V EN7,�
NEIGHS�,!�HbOUS,
A�JD STRHTEG�iC F'LANNING
Dear Rebecca: -- �" - — -
I have noticed the pink signs announcing a public hearing on the Aster Park Annexation.
I wanted to give you some comments. I know that the owner of the property can do
whatever he wants with the property.
Years ago, the owner of the Fir Grove Trailer Park on SR 900 tried to annex into Renton
at the R-48 zoning. Renton turned hini down. Now he is trying to annex to Renton at
the R-4 zone—which is a little better.
When the�campaign was on to try to incorporate as the City of Briarwood, it was my job
to talk to.the-residents of the trailer park about incorporation. Many of the residents in
� this trailer park are Hispanic and did not understand or speak English. Their children
live in poverty. Their children attend Issaquah Schoo,ls and are enrolled in the ESL
(English as a Second Language) program. Some of the parents speak:little or no
English.
How can City of Renton officials know if these residents understand what is happening?
Do they know that their taxes will be going up? Has the owner notitied the residents °
that he is going to be annexing into Renton to eventually kick these people off the land
they are renting? I don't know. Has the property owner talked to the residents to find
. out if t}iey want to be in Renton?
It will be interesting to watch what happens.
Sincerely,
. ; �/`'�`•�.et' ���'1�a�
.
� . :..:..:: . :.. Claudia Donnell -
. . y _, ,
�� :. .-. . . _. - . ;��; . , � . . , , ,� , �. . ..
Cc. � , Gity,Gouncil . . . .. � , ,-....
, . Inez Petersen . ; , , . ;
� Cp�)
�-��'l� �� _
�� �s
� �
,2��G� ,��' Y/� � ��'� �,S v�� � �' �'r�� � '� 1��lQ� ����=!'
� . _� �� ��� � � �� � �
�Q ����
, .�
��'.
-� Washington State Boundary Review Board
�or King County
Yesler Building,Room 402,400 Yesler Way,Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: (206)296-6800 •Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://www.metrokc.gov/annexations
March 8, 2007
City of Renton
Attn: Don Erickson, AICP
Senior Planner
1055 S�uth (irauy S'Vay
Renton, WA 98055
RE: REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION TO LEGAL DESCRIPTION
File No. 2252 - City of Renton- Aster Park Annexation
Dear Mr. Erickson:
Enclosed,please find a,copy of.the letter from:King:County engineering staff reviewing the legal
description,submitted with the above-referenced Notice.of Intention. . �
We are assuming that you will be in accord with, the. reco�unendations made by County
engineering staff and are continuing to process this file. However, if you should disagree with
the requested corrections, please notify our office immediately. Any questions regarding these
recommendations should be directed to Nicole Keller, Road Services Division, at (206)296-3731
Please send a copy of the corrected legal description to our of�ce as soon as possible. We need
to have the corrected legal description on file prior to issuing a letter of approval. Also, please
be advised that the corrected legal description must be used on all future documents related to
this proposed action.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Enclosure: :Letter.from King County Road Services Division, dated .March 7, 2007 � �
cc: ,Lydia Reynolds-Jones,.Manage.r, Project Support,Services (w/o enclosures)
� Anne Noris,' Clerk of the Council (w/o enclosures) ; � �. �
FORM 7
� � :
, • �CE,1�/�D
. �� R
a� ' M�I,gA �001
. .. 1'sc�...__
'���� ��@�9G6�� ���Ku9C�-
Road Services Division
Department of Transportation
KSC-TR-0231
201 South Jackson Street
Seattle, WA 98104-3856
March 7, 2007
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Boundary Review Board
YES-BR-0402
RE: City of Renton—Aster Park Annexation (BRB File 2252�
Dear Ms. Blauman:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the legal description for the proposed Aster Park
Annexation to the City of Renton transmitted with your February 5, 20071etter. Staff
reviewed the enclosed revised legal description and found it satisfactory and complete,
except for one minor correction.
Paragraph 2, where it reads "as annexed under O �' a ac o ��`�=-' i � ould
read "as annexed under + ���Z�nailc� o. �068,•"
When reviewing legal descriptions for annexations, staff attempts to identify islands of
unincorporated County and/or marginal road rights-of-way that may have been
overlooked by the City in developing the legal description. For this particular
annexation, the submitted legal description excludes 148th Avenue SE. The location of
the 2004 Urban Growth Boundary Line is such that 148th Avenue SE should be
transferred to the City, between SE May Valley Road and SE 128th Street. The Road
Services Division recommends that arrangements be made with the City for the transfer
of this complete road segment under this, or subsequent annexation action.
There are no segregated parcels in the annexation area.
This annexation does not include any King County parks.
There are no King County-maintained off-road stormwater facilities within the
annexation boundary.
There are no new streets within the proposed annexation boundary that remain under
maintenance-defect bonds with King County.
���1t03M
r '
• ,, ' �
� ' .
' Lenora Blauman
March 7, 2007 �
Fage 2
There are no tax lots within the annexation area found to be owned by King County Road
Services. However, the following tax lots are owned by King County:
• 029385-0390
• 029385-0370
• 029385-9011
If you have any questions, please contact Nicole Keller, Vacations and Boundaries
Engineer, at 206-296-3731, or via e-mail at Nicole.Keller@metrokc.gov.
Si cerely,
�C(. i✓ C�—
ydia Reynolds-Jones
Manager
Project Support Services
LRJ:NK:mr
Enclosures �
cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the King County Council (w/enclosures)
Paulette Norman, P.E., County Road Engineer, Road Services Division
Debbie Clark, Administrative Specialist, Department of Assessments
Daisy Tamayo, GIS Specialist, Department of Assesssments
Nicole Keller, Engineer II, Engineering Services Section, Road Services Division
•� Washington State .Boundary �eviezv Board
. For ICing County
Yesler Building,Room 402,400 Yesler Way,Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: (206)296-6800 •Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://www.metrokc.gov/annexations
February 5, 2007 ` R�C�+,j�l��
FE��� ` 1�0T
KC.Roads E��neet�in
TO: Ms. Lydia Reynolds-Jones Sd�vices g
Department of Transportation
Manager, Project Support Services
KSC-TR-0231
FROM: Lenora Blauman, Executive Secretary
SUBJECT: File No. 2252 - City of Renton- Aster Park Annexation
Enclosed please find the legal description and related Assessors map(s) submitted to our office as
part of the above-referenced Notice of Intention. We would appreciate your reviewing the legal
description and reporting your findings and recommendations back to our office. �
The copy of the enclosed legal description is for your use and files. It would facilitate
processing of revisions to the legal description, however, if you would return a copy of the legal,
with any notations you choose to make, along with your report. We would appreciate your
response within the 45-day waiting period, which is expected to end March 19,�2007. The
deadline for requesting that the Board invoke jurisdiction and hold a public hearing can only be
changed by a revision to the legal description or modification of the original Notice of Intention,
The support and expert assistance which you and your staff provide on legal descriptions is
essential to Board processing of pro�osed actions. Please let us know if we need to provide you
with any further data.
cc: Kelly Whiting, Engineer IV, Road Services Division, (w/o enclosures)
Nicole Keller, Engineer II, Road Services Division, (w/o enclosures)
R.S.V.P. Marcli 5, 2007
FORM 5
i • a
+� •
�� �C RM�r�n�.e v.�y,.e � .
� EX111b1� D
t��c�r�'��
. .,
ASTER PARK ANNEXt�TION �EB � 2007
LEGAL I)ESCitIPTIpN wAscaceeourxtaryRev�evu
Baard For IQng Co.
That portion of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3,Township 23
North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County,Washington, lying southerly of the northerly �
right-of-way margin of NE Sunset Blvd (State Route 900, SE Renton�Tssaquah Rd,
Primary State Highway No. 2);
EXCEPT that portion of said right-of-way lying northeasterly of the existing City Limits
of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 5069; and
EXCEPT the east 30 feet for road.
FILE N0. 2252 -CI�Y OF. RENTON - AS7ER� PARK� ANNEXATION
. ,
. ,
�_ .
-. _. -._ ..-...._,. ..., -- -- - -- � -- - . . -. ._... .
, .._ .
•-' .--. ..___._,--:-.� �---:: --,- : -. , - -- `
. . ,, , . ; .; ... : ; A;-- . _
.._.3. � ' .._ ..
-�...._. 1 '_-. \. �'' I _� _. ._ _ -� I - _
..
, �.. � l"'"r ; �,` ;' •.-- ..
��!
.'
� i
�..... _._.. .� � �� \� � � � � � .�.-..�, I/' _. ._ . __ "- '
%
I ' I �J�
, , - --., ----- -__.._ _. ..--------._.. -
_.; . __
, . _ ...
� - -
, , . , - _ ,�_... .,_ _
:• .
.._ .
_._.._ . . -1.: � - ... _...
- .-i...� .\ '•J��.\r __.'`_I`_-� -�_ r � �_.. �1l
,�` � _._.__����. � I _ __ ___ i
- �n %� : �` . , �+o. - _
"^ "� 'i� i� ---- V� " '
i . _,�J, /' ..ivi ; -� _ '�_7 _'.___'_— ' � � "-'� "
..
. . , .' _
' ' •' " -
. . . r,_,. �.j� �
. . . � i ; "�� �,.: 1
_ '•
•.
•�.
.:__._i ] `.. �.. i �'� 1 / i '— -- - -�-'-� .
,` ,
f�� \ �.
. ..
.
..\ _
. ,
.
_ � ., � !
�
.: �I'
�
_ ""' � �f., s:
. . • ` •: •�
i.;.. '•�i�_.rj � .� '�. �. ::�""' I'_.._.. ._ _" '...""_'__ �✓ � - .�
:' ____' � ,._..
-„' : ' , . ____ _
:�. " ..' � � ` _ . .—._ ., -�. . '__ __ — \t,_...-.
-� .e ,-
—�.,/ J . . � ', r�- . _ , �` -._, •- - - - �- ' -
. � . , v � , � i' l
—'_ � '
-' " • � .
�.�i � /% �. �..t_r� / �. � 1�.'_I r�l
r _ .
.—� I � .: f r-�L. .� I � r��
l � i(i!� . •-.�y �J,'
i . .
. --._ ,� .�-� ..•y � jj ��'y'; -^ /i �I�`t �
'�J�.� � .�::'..� _
j ' • j • ; i. i�.1�--- � / . ' - _"- _""�
_� . I� �'— ' r � _ " _.. .—_
_ �
, ..
• , � ,
� ` �> ` .
.
:
. .....i , r . i i d- i� /'�:, i 'I..�
_`--- . � � -
-- __�% �._.- _ _� � --�
�,
_:__.- ,- � . , __ �._ _.. ___
i
�(�� --'• ..; �� i f �,` � '-'._•I_'17'\ '%'~�r. � i`,'�t':-'..�.._ -- �r-,- --- - rt -' ' .'_. .. .... ._.......
' � . . � �
.�'- I ' v , , \ �' . .-- - .._"_ ' � . -.�._.
�, .
� .
. '--�'-.....a..-� / � f � �,._� Y'�.:
` � i 1 �� -- � i
_ �----' . � --
.. '_" I �\` I 7'�, � _..-:
� � , � . --- � '----;------"- , : : , -?- - _-;
, ' r---'! i /;-,
..- � c � .`. i j- '- . i � -"- ' _i �" ! -_.__..._.. .
; - .�.�. . ' -...
II 7"--. _ _ •..:._.... - � -- � - _._. ..I
r� � _-: _i V _ ,..-- - -� _�_
i j I : •-- _...- --
i ' . ' �
� r_'c_-.-.i__.._ _,_ , .
� � ; L I _f�. I •w+l , I
, I � •-- . i - -�- i I (�---� t� .`(� i
�----- j � � I-�—j L. �;.. ,
i I ! � � .. i\1 ry . � i
�� � , � , ��� ��,
I �n —a �- � ; I '���` �°�'.., '
� I ---? � � '`-� ��� � �"��° -..-.--��-------�
Y`
� —.�� ---- � -I p � �yr�„'1�
---- � � � _'_'--- I r� � � `'Y '+� �, ur.
I I ` I {.3. � � � � Sa;.` �{ � � �
�--___L i Lw"4ii� _`n� � � �L
I � L�, _...I a� z."�,PI-i...�` � -"t�� r ��3�- 9 �)"^ �}c�'.t}� _'
I ( �- � 'w,� '4 # —_—_ �_.�,7=-,1
l__Y�,� ,. �•�\� 1 / I�
I � <�= . _
i ' L--'i-��- , � � `� 9 F t.� � _I� � . .
�I y . . _ �-_' _ . ��
�_._.Lc-- � �� r^o r� ,m .c . �` � r I
�— � T a I I
I � i � F �� � ,�' -_}--- i r,-�'
-�---_.-.�I.�_._L__- ._.� -t�---- �.<,,.: �'�. �4y-'� ,, ;� n ;� v ,x;, `�`y�; � . _i
� � '
i ----- � I C i. i� ���II � � i � � _� I � I ' �
� + i
s ------- _.0 i _`l ^���-r""���� �r---i-�.
---- � �_ --- -� _�E� ���.. i ? .i i�i �;' ; `
� ' - -� - — � � -i ---- � � i � .
, - ;1. _ = �
� - - � -� -�� ; � � � ; � �
� � �--� � �.__ _. ��.__��r_� � ,-���
- �----1— « � I ; I �,�.. � �+ � J C �._ I' i I�I���', ��•.
j � I � i._ — _-.i , .- ,—`�--
� a � ; _�--__—_ 1--- --�--- __.—'_�--�_i
� 1 � � - -, ;—-- :
�---- I i � - i !
�,-- ---� � - --..�- , .�.. __ --- -- �
i : � __._ I —'T_'^'�
r-i � r f h �t I ; � �_ , ' _ I C--� -- �^ — ._..- �
I � ' �
, --�--
. I I ' �\li� ` � L,` h �;, i �
_ � � �L ..J � � � �.i i i
� I
i ; I
_l_ � i I � i
_� - ' �._`"'- � � � '.
._C.._ --� I ( � �i _ _{ �� ' � �
�1 � ,;- _J----� ' I :- ^ r- .- ---�
� � ��'� -1�� u� �
--- _J � �� � i �I .�,-- ;..--- ---- � � �_ ; � � ��1 �--
; - 1 � - - --__.
_. s f� __� � ,� ,
i C�n
f I I i , I ___.__ '
` --L-- -- � I _.�
1 —_..._� �L i
1St��` ��r� �flC1��C��f��1 a soo l000
�b�t�1:P��posed Annex�t��r�ci��
Cil Limits 1 : 6000
� L'wnonfic Deyelopmrni,Neighlwrhoods&Svatcgic Plnnning ��� Y
� � AI.sP�cic.h.,�dnunis�r�u�r � Pmnnco�l4nnav Aroa
FILE N0. 2252 - CITY OF RENTON - ASTER PARK ANNEXATION
r�. '� . " ' . .
��.
'(._;s.� . .
- . NOTICE OF INTENTION �
PROPOSED ASTER PARK ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RENTON
, �.. ,
I. BACKGROUND/MAPS � �
1. The description of and reason for seeking the proposed action:
The_proposed action is to annex approximately 19.85 acres to the City of Renton.
Annexation is sought by the proponents to develop under City of Renton regulations and
processes and to receive Renton public services.
The annexation was initiated through the 60% Direct Petition method under RCW
35A.14.120, 130, 140,and 150.
The proposed annexation area is located in the NE quarter (1/4) of the SE quarter of
Section 3,Township 23 North;Range 5 East. °
2. Copies of the Renton City Council minutes for actions taken relative to the proposed
annexation:
A. Exhibit A: Certified minutes of the February 13, 20Q6 public meeting of the
Renton City Council accepting the Aster Park Annexation 10%
Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition and
authorizing the circulation of the 60%Petition to Annex.
B. Exhibit B: . Certified minutes of the November 20, 2006 public hearing of the
Renton City Council accepting the 60% Direct Petition to Annex
and declaring the City's intent to annex the area, subject to the
actions of the Boundary Review Board.
3. Exhibit C: Certification of Sufficiency for the 60% Petition to Annex made by the King
County Department of Assessments dated September 20,2006.
4. Exhibit D: Legal description of the proposed annexation.boundaries.
5. Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.222,annexations are exempt from SEPA.
6. The following maps are enclosed:
A. Eghibit E: King County Assessor's maps (two sets) displaying the proposed
Aster Park Annexation boundary.
B. Exhibit F: Vicinity maps displaying:
1) The proposed Aster Park Annexation boundary.
2) The City of Renton existing corporate limits relative to the
proposed annexation area.
3) All major streets and other major physical features.
. - .
. _ { ; � .
_ �.
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County ' .
Proposed Aster Park Annexation
O1/25/07
Page 2 .
� 4) The boundaries, including future service area boundaries, of all .
cities or special service districts having jurisdiction in or near the
proposal.
NOTE: The City and County library service area boundaries are
- cotermirious with the City's corporate boundary.
5) Kirig County Urban Growth Area and City of Renton. Potential
� Annexation Area boundaries established. under the Growth
Management Act.
C. Exhibit G: A map of the current City of Renton corporate limits upon which
the proposed. Aster Park Annexation boundaries have been
delineated.
D. Exhibit H: City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations.
II. FACTORS.THE BOARD MUST CONSIDER
L Overview
A. Population: The population of the proposed annexation area is estimated to be
about 143 persons at full build out based upon 2.3 persons per household and a total
of 62 households. This is in spite of a reduction in the number of units from 67 to
62. This is because it is assumed that 28 mobile homes will be replaced with 19
new single-family detached dwellings that are much larger in size and will house a
larger family size. The City of Renton population as of Apri12005 was 56,840.
B. Territorv: The proposed annexation area includes approximately 19.85 acres.
C. Population Densitv: The proposed density at buildout is approximately 8.62,
persons per gross acre(excluding SR 900 right-of-way).
D. Assessed Valuation: The current assessed value of the properties proposed for
annexation is approximately$16,132,500. At build-out in 10 years,this is estimated
� to increase to$26,632,500. ,.�
2. Land Use
A. Existin : Existing uses include thirty-nine new single-family detached homes with
an estimated population of 90 persons when fully occupied, two existing single-
family dwellings with an estimated population of 4 persons, and 28 mobile homes
with an estirnated population of 49 persons.
B. Proposed: The annexation is proposed to facilitate the development of these
� properties for single-family residential uses at up to four (4) units per net acre. It is
anticipated that the mobile home site ,will either be redeveloped as a new
subdivision or possibly be remodeied into a more upscale mobile home park.
3. Comprehensive Plans/Franchise(s)
A. Conformance with Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Kin�Countv:
r '
, Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Aster Park Annexation
..:,. O1/25/07
Page 3
The proposed action is consistent with tlie Countywide Planning Policies in general,
and the following policies in particular:
LU-31 In collaboration with adjacent counties and cities and King County, and in
consultation with residential groups in affected areas, each city shall
designate a potential annexation area. Each potential annexation area
shall be specific to each city....
LU-32 A city may annex territory only within its designated potential annexation
area. All cities shall phase annexations to coincide with the ability for the
city to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services to areas to
be annexed.
4
The City of Renton has designated a Potential Annexation Area in the City's
Comprehensive Plan. (Exhibit H) Renton has the ability to provide a full range of
urban services to the area proposed for annexation and is the designated sewer
service provider for the East Renton Plateau.
LU-33 Undeveloped lands adjacent to that city should be annexed at the time
development is proposed to receive a full range of urban services.
Development has recently occurred on much of the site as the consequence of the
availability of sewers. The new Aster Park Subdivision includes 37 single-family
detached dwelling units. The remaining 7.38 acres of the site are anticipated to
eventually develop with a potential additiona121 dwellings.
FW-13.Cities are the appropriate providers of local urban services to urban areas
either directly or by contract.
Renton is prepared to provide a full array of local urban services to the area
including sewer, water, police, fire, local government and an array of other
community services. Renton is the designated sewer purveyor for the site and
Water Distxict No. 90 is the designated purveyor of water under agreement with
King County and the City, for the site. The site will remain in the Issaquah School
District.
B. King Countv Comurehensive Plan/Ordinances
1) King County Planning under the Growth Management Act.
The subject area is designated Urban - 4-12 du/ac in the King County
Comprehensive Plan and is identified as being within Renton's Potential
Annexation Area on the County's Potential Annexation Areas 1VIap. King
County planning efforts under the Growth Management Act have included
ensuring that development in the Urban Growth Area occurs at urban
densities and with urban level services available. The City of Renton has
planned for urban densities for this area and can provide urban services
within its negotiated service areas should annexation occur.
2) The following adopted King County Comprehensive Plan policies
specifically support the proposed annexation:
Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.B, Directin� Growth to Cities
and Urban Areas
C
]
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County ,
Proposed Aster Park Annexation ,
O1/25/07
Page 4
U-203 King County should encourage most population and employment
growth to locate in the contiguous Urban Growth Area in western
King County, especially in cities and their potential annexation
areas.
Annexation would allow the City of Renton to provide the area with other
urban services in addition to wastewater, such as"police, libraries, parks,
and local government.
Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section II.C, Urban Growth Area
Targets
U-208 King County shall provide adequate land capacity for residential,
commercial and industrial growth in the urban unincorporated
area. This land capacity shall include both redevelopment
opportunities as well as oppo�•tunities for development on vacant
lands.
R-4 zoning on the subject properties lowers the capacity represented by the
existing King County zoning,which is R-4. Renton's R-4 zone would result
is approximately 20 percent less capacity than allowed under the current
County zoning without bonuses and approximately 47 percent less capacity
than allowed under the current County zoning with bonuses. This is
because Renton calculates density based upon net acreage and the County's
calculates density based upon � acreage. An estimated 99.48 units
could be provided under the County's R-4 zoning (with bonuses) and
approximately 53 new single-family detached units could be provided under
Renton's proposed R-4 zoning.
Chapter Two, Urban Land Use, Section III.A, Planning with Kin�
County's Cities for Future Annexation
U-301 King County should work with cities to focus countywide growth
within their boundaries and should support annexations within the
Urba�a Growth Area when consistent with the King County
Comprehensive Plan and Countywide Planning Policies.
U-304 Kirag County slaould support annexation proposals when:
a. The proposal is consistent with the King County
Comprehensive Plan;
b. The proposed area is wholly within the Uf�ban Growth Area
and within the city's designated Potential Annexation Area
(for annexations);
c. The city is.planning for urban densities and efficient land
use patterns consistent with the Countywide Planning
Policies and King County land use plans; and,
d. Adopted Countywide goals and policies for urban services,
environmental and cultural resource protection will be
supported. �
,
� Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Aster Park Annexation
O1/25/07
Page 5
� The proposal is generally consistent with the King County Comprehensive
Plan and Land Use Map. The area proposed for annexation is wholly
within the Urban Growth Area and within Renton's Potential Annexation
Area. The City's Comprehensive Plan policies and development
regulations support countywide goals and policies for urban densities,urban
services and environmental and cultural resource protection. The proposed
R-4 zoning is.urban, medium lot zoning, which will achieve urban densities
and efficiencies consistent with adopted countywide goals and policies for
urban services.
3) Adopted Kin� County Comp Plan desie,nation: The adopted King County
Comprehensive Plan land.use designation for the proposed annexation area is
both Urban Residential > 12 dulac on the western portion of the site and Urban
Residential - 4-12 du/ac on the eastern portion of the site. These designations
are implemented with the County's R-48 Zone on the western portion and the
County's R-4 zone on the eastern portion. The latter bonuses up�to six units per
gross acre.
4) Comparison of Cit�and Coun regula�ions for sensitive areas, etc: With
annexation, King County ordinances and regulations would be supplanted with
those of the City of Renton. City of Renton ordinances and regulations
applicable to the proposed action include the following:
a. Regulations for the protection of sensitive areas: The City of Renton's
Critical Areas Ordinance (RMC 4-3-050) describes permitted and
prohibited activities and uses, waivers,modifications and variances, and
additional criteria and permit processes for development in critical
areas. Critical areas regulated by the Ordinance include aquifer
recharge areas, flood and geologic .hazard areas, native habitat and
wetlands. Although specific regulations vary, Chapter 21A.24,
Environmentally Sensitive Areas, of the King County Code provides
comparable regulatory protection of sensitive areas. The City of Renton
Critical Areas Ordinance is available upon request.
b. Re�ulations for the preservation of agricultural or other resource lands:
Regulations preserving agricultural uses are not applicable to the
subject area, as the proposed annexation area is not within any of the
agricultural clistricts identified for first, second or third priority for the
purchase of development rights. Further, the properiy is not designated
for agricultural production or other resource lands in the King County
Comprehensive Plan and is not currently under agricultural use. The
City of Renton does not have a program authorizing transfer or
purchase of development rights.
c. Preservation of Landmarks or Landmark Districts: The City of Renton
has no regulations comparable to Chapter 20.62, Protection and
Preservation of Landmarks Landmark Sites and Districts, in the King
County Code. However, no landmark sites or districts are lrnown to
exist in the subject annexation area.
d. Surface Water Control: The City of Renton has adopted the 1990 Kin�
Countv Surface Water Desi�n Manual, by reference, in the City's
Drainage (Surface Water) Standards (RMC 4-6-030) as the design
standard for surface water control in development proj ects. Higher
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King Gounty ' �
Proposed Aster Park Annexation
O1/25/07
Page 6
standards such as those of the 2005 Kin� Countv Surface Water Desi,�n
Manual, Level 2 standard are often applied through environmental
review.
C. City of Renton Comprehensive Plan/Franchise
1) Ci Planni�Under the Growth Mana�ement Act
Renton City Council adopted the current Comprehensive Plan in 1995,
consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act. The 1995
Comprehensive Plan was updated in the 2004 Mandated Growth
Management Act Comprehensive Plan Review. The Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map identifies Potential Annexation Areas, including the area
currently proposed for annexation, and shows land use designations for such
areas. (See Exhibit H, City of Renton Land Use Designations)
The proposal is consistent with the Land Use Element policies of the
Renton Comprehensive Plan that support annexation of lands:
• that are within Renton's Potential .Annexation Area where the
availability of infrastructure and services allow for the development
of urban densities (Objective LU-1);
• that are vacant and subject to development pressure(LU-319.85);
• that are available for urbanization under county comprehensive
planning,zoning, and subdivision regulations (LU-37.5);
• for which the City of Renton should logically be the primary
provider of urban infrastructure and services (LU-36);
• that would include those who already use City services or who
impact City infrastructure(LU-41); and
• that includes environmentally sensitive areas and vacant land where
future development could adversely influence the environmental
and land use character of Renton (LU-42).
2) PAA status and PAA a�reements with other cities, if any: The City of
Renton has an adopted Potential Annexation Area. This area includes three
sub-areas, which are shown on Renton's Comprehensive Plan and on the
King County Interim Potential Annexation Area Map. The City has also
negotiated a PAA boundary agreement with the City of Kent. No PAA
agreement was necessary for the area currently proposed annexation.
3) Required Comprehensive Plan amendments, if anv: No amendment to
Renton's Comprehensive Plan is necessary to process the current proposed
annexation.
4) Comprehensive Plan approval date: Renton's current Comprehensive Plan
was initially adopted on February 20, 1995, with annual amendments in
subsequent years. The latest, 2004 Mandated GMA Comprehensive Plan
Review was completed in November 2004.
5) Required franchises to serve area: No franchise will be required for the
City of Renton to provide services to the subject area.
�
; Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Aster Park Annexation '
O1/25/07
Page 7
6) Pre-annexation Zoning Agreements: The subject area has not been the �
subject of a pre-Annexation Zoning Agreement.
7) Proposed land use desi ng ation: The subject area is designated Residential
Low Density in the City's Comprehensive Plan. R-4 zoning, at a maximum
of four units per net acre is proposed to supplant both the existing King
County R-48 and R-4 zoning, consistent with the adopted Residential Low
Density land use designation upon annexation. Under Renton's annexation
process, zoning is adopted concurrent with the adoption of the
implementing annexation ordinance.
4. Planning data
A. Revenues/Expenditures .
This analysis identifies the General Fund revenues and costs associated with
annexing the subject properties as they are currently developed; as well as
estimating the annual fiscal impact of their full development at some undetermined
point in the future. "Full development" does not equate to the absolute zoned
capacity. Rather, it includes an assumption that a portion of the subject properties
will not develop within the foreseeable future due to market forces and the choices
of individual property owners. All assumptions regarding revenues and costs are
based on existing standards or other comparable data, but actual results are likely to
vary from these estimates. In general, costs associated with utilities have been
assumed to be supported by the rates charged for those services.
Assessed Valuations
Units Population(est.) Assessed Valuation
Existing conditions 67 140 $16,132,500
Full develo ment est.) 62* 143 $26,632,500
'�Assumes new single-family detached home value of$500,000 per unit.
1) Estimated Citv Expenditures
City Services Current I+'ull
Development Developmemt
Contracted services $1,880 $1,920
Road Maintenance $438 $3,212
Fire Protection $20,166 $33,291
Police Protection $38,765 $39,595
Parks Maintenance $2,131 $2,131
Court, Legal and Other $9,369 $9 570
Total ongoing costs $72,749 �89,719
Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County •
Proposed Aster Park Annexation
O1/25/07
Page 8
2) Estimated City Revenues to be a�
Current Full
Revenue Source Development .. Develop�ent
Regular Property Tax Le $50,792 $83,851
State-Shared Revenues $5,040 $5,148
Miscellaneous Revenues $18,178 $17,711
Excess Levy $1,268 $2,094
Total revenues $�5�2�g $108,804
3) Estimated Net Fiscal Impact
Net�scal ianpact �� ��
�xistin� ($ , l
Full � ��,�p�
3) Estimated Countv revenues lost: The estimated reduction in County
revenues would be$38,335 at current development(road and library levies,
excluding library bonds).
4) Estimated reduction in County expenditures: The estimated reduction in
County expenditures is anticipated to be minimal, as only a minor amount
� of improved King County roadway exists in the proposed annexation area.
SR 900 is a state route, generally maintained by WSDOT,not the County.
5) Estimated fire district revenue lost: The area proposed for annexation lies
within Fire District No. 10. Whereas he City currently provides fire
services under contract to Fire District No. 25, no similar agreement exists
for Fire District No. 10. As consequence there is an estimated loss of
$17,007 to this fire district upon annexation to Renton.
6) Estimated fire district expenditures reduced: The estimated savings to Fire.
District No. 10 because of this annexation is assumed to be minimal since
only 140 or so residents are currently served.
B. Services
1) Water Service
Tlie proposed annexation is within District No, 90's water service area.
This service area would not change as a result of the proposed annexation.
a) Direct/Contract: The area will continue to be served by District No.
90 for the foreseealile future. Future development in this latter area
will have to notify District No. 90 regarding water availability and
obtain a certificate of water availability prior to future development.
b) Stora�e locations/Capacity: The zoned residential capacity under
the existing King County zoning is significantly higher in the R-48
portion than the capacity under the proposed City of Renton R-4
zoning. The zoned residential capacity under the existing King
`
, Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Aster Park Annexation . -
O1/25/07
Page 9
_ " ,County R-4 zoning on the eastern portion of the site is'also higher
than the capacity under the City of Renton's R-4 zoning. Since
� � population growth'under the City of Renton's proposed R-4 zoning
is considerably less than that allowed under the County's R-48
zoning, the District's capacity should be more than adequate for the
water demand generated by any post-annexation development in the
subject area. The change. in zoning that would occur upon
. arinexation of this area would, theoretically, increase storage
capacity for Water District No. 90.
.c) Mains to serve "the area: Water District No. 90 will require
developers to extend mains into the annexation area as part of their
future development proposals.
d) Financin�of proposed service: This will be financed by developers
and normal user fees for existing and new residents.
2) Sanitary Sewer Service
� a) Direct/Contract: Sewer service would be provided directly to the �
proposed 19.85-acre annexation area by the City of Renton.
b) Mains to serve area: The City of Renton currently provides sewer
service to tfie new Aster Park subdivision in the northeast corner of
the site. It does not, however, serve the 32-space Fir Grove Mobile
Home Park to the west. Apparently, that development recently
updated their septic system.
c) Disposal: Sewage disposal will be.through METRO's treatment
facilities.
d) Capacitv Available: Renton's sanitary sewer system has sufficient
capacity to accommodate full buildout of the proposed annexation
area with an estimated 62 single-family detached homes.
e) Financing of proposed service: Ixnprovements within this
annexation area would be anticipated to be made through developer
extensions or homeowner extensions in the future when iesidents
decide they want sewer hook-up. -
3) Fire Service
a) Direct/Contract: Fire District No. 10 currently provides fire
suppression services to the annexation area and will continue to do
so for the foreseeabl.e future.
b) Nearest stations: The annexation area is located between Fire
Station 75,to the east in District No. 10 and Fire Station 12, located
at 1209 Kirkland Avenue NE: The former is located approximately
Washington State-Boundary Review Board for King-�ottnty � .
Proposed Aster Park Annexation
O1/25/07 � .
Page 10
0.7 of a mile to the east and the latter is located approximately 1.5 ,
' miles to the west. �
c) Response time: Response time to any point within the proposed
annexation boundaries could range from four to seven minutes.
Fire Station 12 is approximately seven minutes from the subject site
, and Fire Station 75 is approximately four minutes from the site.
Upon annexation Renton Fire will take over fire service far the
subject area from Fire District No. 10. Because of first responder
, mutual aid provisions, there should be no change in these response
times.
d) Staffin�: Station 12 is fully manned, with five firefighters on duty
per shift. Station 75 is also fully manned and has three firefighters
on duty per shift.
e) 1Vlajor equipment: Major equipment located at Station 12 includes
, two 1,500 gallon per minute pumpers and one aid car.
� Certified EMT/D-Fib personnel: All shift personnel at Station 12
are certified EMT/D-Fib.
g) Fire Ratin�: Renton's fire rating is 3.0, as determined by the
Washington State Survey and Rating Bureau.
h) Source of dispatch:. Valley Communication 911 service is the
source of emergency vehicle/aid dispatch.
5. General
A) Annexation aQreements for extensions of service: No applicable annexation
agreements are in effect for the subjeet area.
B� Togoaraphv and natural boundaries: . Although the site is relatively level the
greatest change occurs on the western half where it peaks at 145 meters and drops
some 20 meters (65 feet) to Honey Creek in.its southwest corner. The eastern half
of the site slopes gradually to the north dropping approximately 16 feet from SE 12�'
to NE Sunset Boulevard on the north.
B) Projected 10-year �rowth: The area is too small to make reasonable inferences from
large-area growth forecasts. The City actually projects a reduction of five dwelling
units if the older Fir Grove Mobile Home.Park with its 32 spaces eventually
redevelops with 20 new single-family units under Renton's R-4 zoning. Aster Park
subdivision, approved in King County, has 361ots and the remaining two parcels in
the southwest corner of the annexation site could theoretically accommodate 6 units,
for a tota162 single-family detached units.
D) Municipal or community services: With annexation, the property owners and
residents would have access to a full range of urban services including police, fire,
parks, libraries, community services, the City's neighborhoods program, annual
community events, and readily accessible local municipal government.
E) Potential delays in implementing service deliverv: The area is currently
underserved in regards to park facilities according to the City's adopted level.of
. Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County
Proposed Aster Park Annexation .,
O 1/25/07
Page 11
service.standards. This shortfall is identified in the City's Par-ks, Trails and Open
� Space Plan update. Staff estimates a one-time cost in excess of parks/recreation
mitigation fees of$29,001 as well as on-going maintenance costs of$2,131 for new `
� parks associated with this annexation. .
The current waste hauler would continue to provide solid waste removal for seven
years after annexation, according to state law. At that time, the area would then be
included in the.contract with the City's waster hauler. With the exception of parks
arid solid waste remo�al,no delays are expected in implementing service delivery to
the area. City departments reviewing the annexation proposal indicated that they
would be able to adequately serve existing and future development. Water District
No. 90 is expected to continue to provide water service to the subject site, and has
not indicated any major obstacles to service delivery at this time.
� F) Evaluation of adequacv, costs, or rates of service to area: Existing services to the
area appear to be adequate. As additional development occurs in the proposed
annexation area, demand for services will increase. It is assumed that the cost of
such services will be largely offset by property taxes, charges for service, and other
revenues based on population. If the City were to assume this annexation at current
levels of development it'would have a negative cash flow of an estimated$1,233 per
year. At full development, in an estimated ten years, the City would realize an
� annual surplus of an estimated$10,545 per year.
King County and Fire District No. 10 are the only alternative service providers for
services that would be assumed by the City of Renton upon annexation. As noted
above, fire suppression sexvices will be taken over by the City as will other services
provided by King County, such as sheriff and road maintenance. School district
boundaries will not change as they are not affected by annexation. As a result, the
subject area will remain within the Renton School District.
III. OBJECTIVES
The proposed Aster Park Annexation generally complies with all of the objectives of the Boundary
Review Board. These include the following: .
1) Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities.
. No detrimental impacts to existing neighborhoods or communities are anticipated to result
from the proposed action. Both the Aster Park subdivision and Fir Grove Mobile Home
Park are included as full entities.
2) Use of physical.boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways and
land contours.
The proposed annexation includes and is bordered by SR 900, a state highway, on the north
. and the Urban Crrowth Boundary, 148`�'Avenue SE, on the east. It abuts the City on the west
and a portion of its northern boundary.. However,because of a recent Supreme Court
decision against expansions of annexations, an unincorporated island will result. The City
has been in discussion with developers in the area and anticipates that this area will annex
into the City shortly.: If it does not the City of Renton will likely use RCW 35A.14.295 to '
bring it in using the resolution method since it is well under 100 acres in area:
� J
Washington State Boundary Reyiew Board for King County ` :
PropoSed Aster Park Annexation
O1/25/07
Page 12
3) Creation and preservation of logical service areas.
City staffs that have reviewed the proposed annexation have stated that the proposed
boundaries appear to represent logical extensions for the provisiori of City services. Also,
the Countywide Planning Policies state that cities are the appropriate.providers of local .
urban services to Urban Areas such as this. The proposal would,therefore, further both the
intent of the City annexation objectives and Countywide Planning Policies.
4) Prevention of abnormally irregular.boundaries.
The boundaries do not create abnormally irregular boundaries. Whereas the resulting
boundaries are somewhat irregular these are anticipated to only be interim as the City grows
east to the adjacent Urban Growth Boundary along'148`i'Avenue SE. As noted above,
because of a recent Supreme Court decision regarding a Board expansion of another
annexation,the City will no longer invoke jurisdiction and request that the immediate area
to the north, aeross the highway,be included as a part of this annexation. The City,as the
designated sewer service provider in the area will issue sewer certificates with covenants for
property owners not to oppose annexation. These covenants should facilitate annexations of
the remaining unincorporated areas in the area,especially those to tlie north and south of the
site.
5) Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of
incorporation of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban
� areas.
Not applicable: . _
6) Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts.
Not applicable.
7) Adjustment of impractical boundaries.
This annexation is not being undertaken to adjust impractical city boundaries.
8) Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated
areas,which are urban in character
King County has designated this area for urban development.
9) Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term
productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the
county legislative authority.
Not applicable. No portions of the proposed annexation area are designated Rural or
designated for long term productive agricultural or resource: use in the King County
Comprehensive Plan.
.�ni
� � CERTIFI�ATE
� - l,�l�e u�ders}gned City Clerk af the
. �ity o�'Renton,Wash�ngtori,certify
that�hi is a t �a d p,�ec�c�oPY°�
2 �3 0(o�un����'�'�,�„�������'ubscribed
. EX�11�32t A ` and seal�d this Z�av�f T1�� ,20�`?
, �,��.�.�� 1�1.Q.��'��-"`-'
r w� �_
RENTON CITY COUNCIL ��t,�.ty Ciiy(;�s�r�
Regular Meeting •
February I3,20d6 . Cauncil Chambers
Monday,7:00 p.m M I N U T E S Renton City HaII
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker called the meeting of the Renton City Council to arder
and led the Piedge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF RANDY CORMAN,Council President;DON PERSSON;MARCIE PALMER;
COUNCILMEMBERS TERRI BRIERE;DENIS LAW;DAN CLAWS(JN;TUNI NELSfJN.
CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER,Mayar;LAWRENCE J.WARREN,City Attorney;
ATTENDANCE BONNIE WALTON,City Clerk;GREGG ZIMMERMAN,
PlanninglBuilding/Public Works Administrator;ALEX PIET5CH,Econamic
Devetopment Administratar;DON ERICKSqN,Senior Pia�ner;LINDA
HERZOG,Interim Assiscant to the CAO;CC?MMANDBR KENT CURRY,
Police Department:
PROCLAMATION A proctamation by Mayor Keolker was read declaring fhe day of February 13,
Boeing 737 Day-2l13/20Q6 2006,to be"Boeing 737 Day"in the City af Renton,encauraging all citizens to
recognize the important contributions The Boeing Camgany and its employees
have made and continue to make to the City af Rentan. MQVED BY LAW,
SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
PROCLAMATION AS READ. CARRIED.
The Mayor noted that she attended a special ceremoriy today,which celebrated
Boeing's delivery of the S,OOOth 737 airplane to Southwest Airlines. Carolyn
A.Brandsema,Director of Engineering,737I757 Programs Boein$Cammercial
Airplanes,accepted the praclarnation on behaif af alI the men and women at
Boeing wha have warked over the years to make the 737 the mast popular
commerciat jetliner in the history of the warld.
. PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and pubiished in
Annexation: Aster Park, accordance with 3ocal and State Iaws,Mayor Keolker opened ttle public
Sunset Blvd NE meeting to consider the 1Q%a Notice of Intent petitian for the proposed Aster
Park Annexation; 19,$5 acres,including tha SR-9Q0 right-of-way,located along
� the south side of Sunset Blvd.NE(SR-900),west of 14$th Ave.SE,north of
SE 112th St.,if extended,and east of 144th Ave.SE,if extended.
I?on Erickson,Senior Planner,stated that existing development on tha site
includes the six-acre Fir Grove Mabile Hame Paxk,two single-family "
dwellings,and a new 37-lot sybdi,visian that is currently being built. The .
topagraphy of the site is relatively ftat. In regards ta the pnbIic services,Mr.
Ericksan noted that Fire District#10,Water District#94,Rentan sewer,and.tha
Issaquah School District serve tlie area:
Mr.Erickson reparted that cunent King Gounty zoning is R-4 for the eastern
partion of the site,and R-tt8 for the western portian. The Rentan
Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Residential I.ow Density,which
allaws R-4{faur dwelling units per net acre)zoning:. He stated that ttze fiscal
° irnpact analy.sis estimates a deficit of$8,707 at current development,a surplus
of$23,892 at full development,and a ane-time parks development cost of
$27,724.
February 13,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 35 ' "
. � In conclusion,Mr. Erickson said the proposed annexation furthers the City
business goals, and is generally consistent with Boundary Review Board
objectives and City policies.
In response to Councilwoman Nelson's inquiry, Mr.Erickson and City Attorney
Larry Warren indicated that they do not know what the owners of the mobile
home park property plan to do with the property.
Public comment was invited.
�
Claudia Donnelly, 10415 147th Ave. SE,Renton, 98059, voiced concern
regarding surface water runoff from the Aster Park area through her yard to
May Creek. She noted that annexation area boundaries are often expanded,and
expressed concern that her neighborhood will become part of this annexation.
Emphasizing that she wants the opportunity to express her opinion regarding
annexation to Renton via the ballot box,Ms. Donnelly requested that her
neighborhood, the Aster Park annexation area, and the rest of the King County
� area participate in the Preserve Our Plateau Annexation election.
- Jullianne Bruce, 17100 SE 136th St.,Renton, 98059, expressed her concern
regarding surface water runoff from the increase in impervious surfaces due to
developmenti. She stated her desire that the area remain rural, and that the
annexation be taken to a vote and not forced upon residents who may not want
to annex to Renton. Ms. Bruce also commented that the lifestyles of affected
' residents are being compromised if it is true that in order to obtain mass
� transportation funding, urban areas must grow and rural areas must shrink.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCII.ACCEPT
THE ASTER PARK 10%PETITION TO ANNEX,AUTHORIZE
CIRCULATION OF THE 60%DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX, AND
SUPPORT FUTURE ZONIlVG CONSISTENT WITH THE
� COMPREHENSNE PLAN RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSTTY LAND USE
DESIGNATION: CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Annexation: Preserve Our accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker opened the public hearing
Plateau, SE 128th St to consider the 10%Notice of Intent to annex petition by the election method
for the proposed Preserve Our Plateau Annexation; approximately 1,475 acres
, located in the vicinity of SE 128th St., SE 149th St., 152nd Ave. SE, and 184th
Ave. SE.
Don Erickson, Senior Planner, stated that approximately 1,630 single-family
dwellings exist on this diverse site, and the annexation proposal is in
compliance witli Boundary Review Board objectives and with relevant City
annexation policies. Reviewing the public services, he.noted that the site is
served by Fire Districts#25 and#10,Water Distxict#90,Renton Sewer,and the
Renton and Issaquah School Districts.
1VIr.Erickson reported that State law requires Council to adopt a resolution
either calling for an election, or disapproving the annexation. If Council calls
for an election, decisions must be made as to whether or not to include
propositions on the ballot regarding future zoning and bonded indebtedness.
- He explained that despite the projected initial deficit of up to$263,000 and the
� February 13,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 36
need to hire as many as 22 new employees, staff recommends placing the
' annexation proposal on the ballot. Mr. Erickson pointed out that there are
major efficiencies to be gained from annexing a larger area at one time that are
not realized with smaller annexations. .
Coritinuing, Mr. Erickson indicated that staff is recommending against asking
residents to vote on future,zoning at this time since the area has not yet been
� prezoned. He noted that staff intends to hold at least two public Hearings on
future zoning this summer. Additionally, staff is recommending that the
proposition on outstanding indebtedness not be included on the ballot.
Retirement of the City's outstanding debt is expected:in 2009, and the amount
that would be collected from the annexation area is estimated at$62,285. Mr.
Erickson stated that if the assumption of the City's outstanding indebtedness is
placed on the ballot, the measure would trigger a super majority approval
requirement, and would require voter turnout of at least 40% of the total votes�
cast in the last general election.
Regarding Fire District#25, Mr. Erickson noted that the subject annexation
area to be served by Renton would remove only 51% of the district's current
assessed value; therefore, the district would continue to exist.
Mr,._�rickson pointed out that if the voters approve the annexation, it is likely to
be six months to a year before it is effectuated. He explained that the City and
� King County will need to enter into various interlocal agreements regarding the
transference of county-owned facilities and county services. :Mr. Erickson
noted that the Mayor will establish a blue ribbon advisory cominittee comprised
of residents and service providers to help with the transition.
Turning to the existing moratorium on sewer availabilities for new subdivisions
within the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area,lVlr.Erickson
reported that the moratorium expires prior to a possible annexation effective
date. Council will need to decide whether to extend the moratorium, or allow
development occurring prior to the effective date to vest to King County
standards.
Mr. Erickson stated that the following will likely happen if the annexation fails:
1) As the designated sewer provider for this.area, the City has already issued
over 250 sewer certificates; 2) The existing moratorium will be lifted and new
certificates will be issued based upon the City's Comprehensive Plan
Residential Low Density land use designation; 3) Future development will
continue under King County development regulations; and 4) The existing
level of service will continue to decline,based upon King County statements.
_ Concluding that that the annexation proposal serves the best interests and •
general welfare of the City,Mr.Erickson pointed out that the anticipated initial
deficit may be offset with a positive cash flow by the time of full development
in ten to fifteen years.
Alex Pietsch,Economic Development Administrator, discussed the King
County 2004 Annexation Initiative, which calls for annexation by 2012 of most
of King County's remaining unincorporated urban areas. The initiative set aside.
a$10 million fund to assist communities in offsetting some of the negative
financial impacts. He reported that the King County executive has expressed
his desire to enter into an interlocal agreement that asks Renton to accept the
county parks and stormwater properties in the subject area, and to consider
hiring county employees. In return, King County agrees to pay Renton $1.15
February 13,2006 Renton City Council Minutes � Page 37 '
million in real estate excise tax, which is required to be used for infrastructure,
and$600,000 in CX funds. Mr. Pietsch noted that the City has requested that
half be paid upon a successful election, and half upon effectuation of the
annexation.
In response to Councilmember inquiries, Mr. Pietsch stated that the CX funds
could potentially be used to purchase police cars. He indicated that issues
concerning stormwater facilities maintenance costs and park improvements will
be discussed in the coming months. Mayor Keolker pointed out that these are
the types of issues that will be discussed by the blue ribbon advisory
committee.
Public comment was invited.
Shirley Day, 14412 167th Pl. SE,Renton, 98059, questioned how the
annexation area's boundaries were determined, and submitted a letter signed by
78 residents who do not want to be annexed to Renton. She expressed her
disappointment with the petitioner's approach to establishing the boundaries,
and stated her desire for a hearing with the Boundary Review Board.
Gwendolyn High, 13405 158th Ave. SE,Renton, 98059, introduced herself as
the president of CARE(Citizens'Alliance for a Responsible Evendell)and the
treasurer of the CARE Annexation Committee who is the petitioner of the
annexation. Ms. High expressed her happiness with the City's efforts so far
with the subject area, including the land use designation and forthcoming tree
retention ordinance. She indicated that she is looking forward to working with
the City on the annexation process.
Claudia Donnelly, 10415 147th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, spoke on behalf of her
mother,Roxanne Reynolds, 13016 156th Ave. SE,Renton, 98059, who does
not want to annex to Renton. Ms.Donnelly stated that she has been in contact
with many residents in the area who do not want to be a part of Renton,and had
been left out of CARE's process for boundary establishment. Ms. Donnelly
requested that the City ask the Boundary Review Board to review the proposed
annexation with a public hearing, and that the annexation area be expanded so
all East.Renton Plateau area residents can vote on the matter. Additionally she
questioned how the City will pay for the new employees and services.
Fred Herber,Bennett Development, 12011 NE lst St., Bellevue, 98005,
expressed his disappointment concerning the possible extension of the sewer
moratorium until after the annexation vote,which is anticipated to occur in the
fall. Emphasizing that time delays cost developers and ultimately homeowners,
Mr. Bennett requested that the moratorium not be extended when it expires in
June.
Jullianne Bruce, 17100 SE 136th St., Renton, 98059, voiced concern about the
increase in water runoff due to the increase in impervious surfaces, noting that
sensitive areas are especially affected by development. She also stressed the
importance of having area residents on the blue ribbon advisory corrunittee.
Responding to Ms. Bruce's comment regarding the bonded indebtedness issue,
Mayor Keolker clarified that the recommendation not to include the issue on
the ballot means that area residents are not going to pay for it.
Mayor Keolker stated that the City is not seeking this annexation but is
responding to a request. However, she indicated that if residents want to come
into the City they are welcome. The Mayor pointed out that if the area remains
� February 13,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 38
' in King County, the existing zoning allows denser development than is allowed
in Renton.
Royden Miser, 13505 166th Ave. SE,Renton, 98059,pointed out that the King
County Sheriffs Office has done an outstanding job of preventing crime at
Liberty High School. Reporting that a police officer is assigned to the school
full time, he inquired if that will continue if the area is annexed to Renton.
Additionally, since the school is within the Issaquah School District, Mr. Miser
inquired as to the taxing for the school districts.
Mayor Keolker said the school district boundaries remain the same, and Mr.
Miser will continue to be taxed for only the Issaquah School District. The
Renton Police Department will serve the area, and enforcement arrangements
will be discussed with the school district. She noted that Renton currently has
school resource officers.
Jack Case, 16445 SE 135th St., Renton, 98059, inquired if Renton has a critical
areas ordinance, noted the presence of beavers in a pond in the annexation area,
and inquired if a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding eminent domain
will affect his six lots. City Attorney Larry Warren indicated that the court
ruling has little or no applicability to the State of Washington. He assured that
Renton's critical areas ordinance is much easier to understand and comply with
than King County's ordinance.
Robert LeCoque, 12916 166th Ave. SE,Renton, 98059,noted that he lives near
the aforementioned beaver pond, or Cemetery Pond, which is located between
164th and 166th Avenues SE, off of SE 128th St. He reported that this semi-
natural occurring pond was modified when King County started creating
controlled runoff collection ponds. Mr.LeCoque pointed out the problems with
the pond, and stated that he is interested to see how Renton will approach on-
going maintenance and correction of existing problems.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCII.: ACCEPT
THE 10% NOTICE OF INTENT PETITION; PASS A RESOLUTION
CALLING FOR AN ELECTION FOR THE 1,475 ACRES OF CONTIGUOUS
UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY KNOWN AS THE PRESERVE OUR
PLATEAU ANNEXATION; AND AUTHORIZE THE ELECTION BALLOT
FOR THIS ANNEXATION TO HAVE ONE PROPOSITION STATING
WHETHER THOSE VOTING SUPPORT OR DO NOT SUPPORT THIS
ANNEXATION AND NOT INCLUDE PROPOSITIONS CONCERNING
OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS AND FUTURE ZONING.*
Council President Corman stated that he was impressed by the questions asked
by tfie speakers, and pointed out that he does not want to change the character
of the area. In response to a previous speaker's comment, he noted that adding
more density does not result in the set-aside of more funding for mass
transportation. Acknowledging that many issues and interests are involved,Mr.
Corman indicated that if annexed,the area and its issues will be under local
control, which may be advantageous to residents in terms of easier access to
government and those more familiar with the area. He expressed his happiness
that the matter is going to a vote.
February 13,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 39 �
Councilman Clawson emphasized that development will be less dense if the
area is annexed to Renton than if it remains in King County, and the area will
receive the same level of serve as the rest of the City.
*MOTION CARRIED. (See page 40 for resolution.)
Mayor Keolker recommended that citizens direct any questions they may have
concerning the annexation to the City of Renton.
ADMINISTRATIVE Linda Herzog,Interim Assistant to the CAO, reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2006 and beyond. Items noted
included:
� The City of Renton, in conjunction with other cities and towns across
Washington State, will simultaneously plant a cherry tree at 11:00 a.m. on
February 14th. Renton's cherry tree will be planted in Earlington Park.
This Statewide celebration, initiated by the Association of Washington
Cities, commemorates the 30th anniversary of a gift of 1,000 cherry trees
from Japanese Prime Minister Takeo Miki to the City of Seattle in 1976, in
recognition of the United State's bicentennial.
� An auto theft prevention program is being offered by the Renton Police
Department. Combined with locking doors,roliing up windows, and
removing all personal belonging from vehicles, a steering wheel locking
device(such as The Club)can be an effective auto theft deterrent. Contact
the Crime Prevention Unit to purchase this steering wheel locking device.
CONSENT AGEIVDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 2/6/2006. Council concur.
2/6/2006
Appointment: Planning Mayor Keolker appointed Greg Taylor, 702 SW 3rd Pl.,Renton, 98055, to the
Commission Planning Commission for a three-year term expiring 6/30/2007. Council
concur,
Community Services: Museum Community Services Department recommended approval to hire the Museum
Supervisor Hire at Step D Supervisor at Step D of the salary range. Council concur.
EDNSP: Multi-Family Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Housing Property Tax recommended approval of the multi-family housing property tax exemption
Exemption, Bristol II at agreement for the Bristol II at Southport project, 1133 Lake Washington Blvd.
Southport N. Refer to Planning and Development Committee.
Streets: Park Ave N Closure, Transportation Systems Division requested authorization for the temporary
South Lake Washington closure of Park Ave. N. from N. 6th St. to Garden Ave. N. for the South Lake
Roadway Improvements Washington Roadway Improvements Project, for a period of six months.
Closure will take place between July 2006 and July 2007, with exact dates
dependent on work progress. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
UNFIIVISHED BUSINESS MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL REFER POLICE
Police: Pawn Shop Procedures PROCEDLJItES FOR PAWN SHOPS TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY
COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
• _ February 13,2006 Renton City Council Minutes . Page 40
Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval
Finance: Vouchers of Claim Vouchers 244801 -245705 and two wire transfers totaling
$6,232,184.58; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 61673 -62048, two wire
transfers; and 1,199 direct deposits totaling$3,905,619.63. MOVED BY
PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption:
ORDINANCES -
Resolution#3790 A resolution was read calling for the annexation, by election, of approximately
Annexation: Preserve Our 1,475 acres of contiguous unincorporated territory within Renton's East Renton
Plateau, SE 128th St Plateau Potential Annexation Area; stating the number of registered voters �
residing therein as nearly as may be; calling for an election to submit to voters
of the territory the proposal for annexation; and authorizing the City Clerk to
file with the King County Boundary Review Board a notice of intention hereof
as well as to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of County
Commissioners of King County and the King County Boundary Review Board.
MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
RESOLVTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution#3791 A resolution was read authorizing the Mavor and Citv Clerk to enter into an
CAG: 95-087, King County interlocal cooperative agreement with King County Fire Protection District#25.
Fire Protection District#25 MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and
adoption:
Ordinance#5196 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 1-3, Remedies and Penalties, of Title
Development Services: I(Administrative)of City Code by clarifying definitions, nuisances, civil and
Nuisance Ordinance criminal violations, and penalties. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY
NELSON, COUNCII.ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL:
ALL AYES. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Council President Corman asked Councilmembers to continue suggesting items
Council: Refreat Planning for discussion at the upcoming Council retreat on March 8th and 9th, and
upcoming Committee of the Whole meetings. Topics to be discussed at the
retreat include The Landing project, Highlands area revitalization plan, and
annexations. Councilman Persson suggested RTID (Regional Transportation
Investment District)and Sound Transit Phase 2, and Mayor Keolker suggested
Councilmember representation pertaining to regional matters.
Transportation: Regional MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCII.REFER A
Issues STANDING REFERRAL FOR UPDATES ON REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION ISSUES AS THEY OCCUR TO THE
TRANSPORTATION(AVIATION) COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN.
CARRIED. Time: 8:33 p.m.
�E��C9'�Yt.(-� � Gl/GZ�6-r��
Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
February 13, 2006
RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALEIVDAR • .
Office of the Gity Clerk •
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
' February 13, 2006 .
COIVIMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COUNCIL WORKSHOP WED. &THURS. To Be Determiried
3/08 & 3/09
COMIVITT I�E OF THE WHOLE MON., 2/20 No Meeting (Presidents'Day)
(Corman) -
MON., 2/27 Field Trip; Tour of Highlands/High Point
4:00 p.m.
COMIVIUNITY SERVICES
(Nelson)
FINANCE MON., 2/27 Vouchers
(Persson) 6:30 p.m.
PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT THURS., 2/16 Bristol II at Southport Multi-Family
(Briere) 3:00 p.m. Housing Property Tax Exemption;
Airport Related Uses Zoning Text
Amendments
PUBLIC SAFETY
(I-aW)
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THCTRS., 2/16 Airport Leasing Policy;
(Palmer) 2:00 p.m. Siltation Issues at Renton Airport
Seaplane Base (briefing only);
Temporary Road Closure of Park Ave. N.
UTILITIES THURS., 2/16 CamWest Request for Oversizing
(Clawson) 4:00 p.m. Reimbursement
NOTE:. Committee of the Whole meetings aze held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Conncil
Conference Room unless otherwise noted. -
� CERTIFICA"1C�
� f, the undersignecl City.Clerk ofthe
City of Renton, VJash�Algton, certify
' that this is a true anc�'A ior eGt c��y of
- lllao 06���Cil rn�'��+n��/�������ubscribed
� } EXlllblt B and sealed this2� �ay of �.�f�� ,20 0`�
�1��. v -
RENTON CITY COUNCIL ���-ty City Ci�rk
Regular.Meeting
November 20,2006 Council Chambers
Monday,7 p.m. � M I N U T E S Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order
and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF RANDY CORMAN,Council President;TONI NELSON;DAN CLAWSON;
COUNCILMEMBERS DENIS LAW;TERRI BRIERE;MARCIE PALMER;DON PERSSON.
CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER,Mayor;JAY COVINGTON,Chief Administrative
ATTENDANCE Officer;LAWRENCE J.WARREN,City Attorney;BONNIE WALTON, City
Clerk;GREGG ZIMMERMAN,Planning/Building/Public OVorks
Administrator;ALEX PIETSCH,Economic Development Administrator; DON
ERICKSON,Senior Planner;REBECCA LIND,Planning Manager;MARTY
WINE,Assistant CAO;TERRY HIGASHIYAMA,Community Services
Administrator; LESLIE BETLACH,Parks Director;GERALD RERECICH,
Recreation Director; PREETI SHRIDHAR,Communications Director; CHIEF
I. DAVID DANIELS,Fire Department; CHIEF KEVIN MILOSEVICH,
DEPUTY CHIEF TIM TROXEL and COMMANDER KATIE MCCLINCY,
Police Department.
PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Finance: Impact Fees,Issaquah accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker opened the public hearing
&Kent School Districts to consider the following:
1. Increasing the impact fee from$5,115 to$6,136 collected for all new
single-family homes built within the boundaries of the Issaquah School
District in the Renton City limits.
2. Collecting a new impact fee in the amount of$4,928 for all new single-
family homes built within the boundaries of the Kent School District in the
Renton City limits.
Planning Manager Rebecca Lind stated that consideration of the impact fees is a
result of requests from the school districts,and she pointed out that the matter
has been referred to the Finance Committee. Ms.Lind explained that the
adoption of impact fees requires consideration of three factors: the cost of �
housing in Renton,the capacity in the schools serving Renton residents,and the ,
amount of funds that are expended locally.
Ms. Lind indicated that in both districts,additional capacity is needed for
schools serving Renton residents. The Issaquah School Disfict has scheduled
improvements to Briarwood Elementary,Maywood Middle,and Liberty High
schools. The Kent School District has scheduled improvements that build
additional high school classrooms. She noted that it is anticipated that Renton
will annex territory within the Kent School District in 2007(Anthone'
Annexation).
Ms.Lind stated that both school districts are responding to growth by proposing
capital improvements to schools serving Renton residents, The assessment of
the full impact fee ensures that those who contribute to the growth pay a share
of the growth related costs. She concluded that staff recommends adoption of
the requested impact fees for both school districts.
Public comment was invited.
November 20,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 399 •
' Craig Christensen, 565 NW Holly St., Issaquah, 98027, representing the
Issaquah School District, stated that impact fees are an integral part of the
district's facilities funding. He explained that the district is experiencing growth
from all geographical sectors and these fees provide funding to accommodate
the growth in housing.
Mr. Christensen indicated that$46.9 million of the district's bond is going
directly to schools that will service Renton students, and he described the
proposed improvements to Liberty High, Maywood Middle, and Briarwood
Elementary schools. He also noted that funds were used for acquiring land for
future growth if needed. In conclusion,Mr. Christensen stated that the
proposed improvements are a priority for the district's upcoming Capital
Facilities Plan, and he urged approval of the impact fee increase.
Gwenn Derdowski, 12033 SE 256th St.,Kent, 98030, representing the Kent
School District,reported that the district is the fourth largest in the State and the
second largest in King County. She stated that impact fees are already collected
on behalf of the district by King County, and the cities of Kent, Covington, and
Auburn. Ms. Derdowski noted that the district serves eight permitting
jurisdictions, including a small portion of Renton (City-owned land of the
Springbrook Watershed).
Ms. Derdowski stated that the Renton portion of the district will likely increase
with new annexations. She explained that impact fees present a savings to
existing taxpayers in that future bonds would require less funding from existing
taxpayers since the developers are paying a share of the new growth. Ms.
Derdo�vski reviewed the proposed improvements and enrollment projections
listed in the district's Capital Facilities Plan.
Discussion ensued regarding the reasons for adopting the Kent School District's
impact fee prior to annexation of property within the district. Ms. Derdowski
pointed out that the impact fee collected by Renton will replace the fee already
collected by King County on behalf of the district.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY LAW,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
Annexation: Aster Park, ' This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Sunset Blvd NE accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker opened the public hearing
to consider the 60% Direct Petition to Annex and future zoning for the proposed
Aster Park Annexation; 18.48 acres, including the SR-900 right-of-way, located
along the south side of Sunset Blvd.NE (SR-900), west of 148th Ave. SE, north
of SE 112th St., if extended, and east of 144th Ave. SE, if extended.
Senior Planner pon Erickson explained that the site contains a new 37-lot
single-family subdivision, two homes, and a mobile home park. The
topography is relatively flat, with a 2 percent slope along the eastern 80 percent
of the site, and a 20 percent slope along the western 20 percent of the site. He
noted that public services are provided by Fire District#10, Water District#90,
Renton sewer, and the Issaquah School District.
Mr. Erickson indicated that current King County zoning is R-4 (four dwelling
units per gross acre) and R-48. The Renton Comprehensive Plan designates the .
site as Residential Low Density, for which proposed zoning is R-4 (four
dwelling units per net acre): He pointed out that the proposal is generally
consistent with Boundary Review Board objectives. Mr. Erickson reviewed the
� November 20,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 400
'fiscal impact analysis,which assumes a new home value of$500,000 and a
potential of 61 single-family homes at full development. The City is estimated
to realize a deficit of$8,707 at current development, and a surplus of$23,892 at
full development. He noted the estimated one-time parks development cost of
$27,724.
Mr. Erickson concluded that the proposed annexation furthers City business
goals by ensuring higher quality development and efficient urban services, and
is generally consistent with annexation policies.
Councilwoman Briere noted that an unincorporated island is created north of the
subject site if the site is annexed.
In response to Councilman Clawson's inquiries,Mr. Erickson confirmed that the
mobile home park is on septic system, and the park will come into the City as
legal non-conforming. Councilwoman Briere commented that the mobile home
park's drain field was rebuilt approximately five years ago.
Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY NELSON,
SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL: ACCEPT
THE 60% DIRECT PETITION FOR THE 18.48-ACRE ASTER PARK
ANNEXATION; SUPPORT FUTURE R-4 ZONING CONSISTENT WITH
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY
DESIGNATION; AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO SUBMIT
THE NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW
BOARD AND PREPARE THE RELEVANT ORDINANCES. CARRIED.
Annexation: Hudson, Benson This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Rd S & S 168th St accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker opened the public hearing
to consider the proposed annexation and zoning of 14.63 acres (including
streets) located in the vicinity of SE 168th St. and Benson Rd. S. (Hudson).
Senior Planner pon Erickson reviewed the history of the annexation, noting that
the Boundary Review Board approved the annexation in September 2006. He
pointed out that funcling for the signalization project at SE 168th St. and 108th
Ave. SE could be jeopardized if the City annexes the site prior to King County
awarding the contract. He explained that King County anticipates awarding the
contract in Apri12007; therefore staff recommends adopting the relevant
annexation ordinances but setting the effectuation date for May 2007.
Continuing, Mr. Erickson reported that the western portion of the annexation
site is relatively flat, and the eastern portion slopes towards Soos Creek to the
east. The site contains 19 single-family homes, 152 multi-family units, at least
one vacant parcel, and some commercial properties. Regarding the public
services, he noted that the site is within Fire District#40, Soos Creek Water and
Sewer District, and Renton School District.
Mr. Erickson stated that the site is zoned R-8 (eight dwelling units per gross
acre), R-12, R-18, and Community Business in King County. The City's
Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential Single Family and
Residential Medium Density, for which R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre)
and R-10 zoning is proposed. He reported that the fiscal impact analysis
indicates a deficit of$53,545 at current development and a deficit of$52,349 at
full development, as the site is already built-out. The estimated one-time parks
acquisition and development cost is $138,108.
November 20,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 401 �
' In conclusion, Mr. Erickson stated that the annexation proposal is consistent
with Boundary Review Board objectives and City annexation policies. He
pointed out that the surface water costs are estimated at$3,258 annually,and
unless the City delays the effectuation date, it will be responsible for the
signalization project costs estimated at$789,000. Mr. Erickson indicated that
the annexation furthers City business goals by encouraging responsible growth,
and possibly serving as a catalyst for expanding its boundaries to the north or
west to result in a more regular City boundary.
Councilman Law expressed concern that King County will not award the
contract prior to the proposed effectuation date of the annexation and the City
will then be liable for the project costs. Councilman Clawson noted that it is
possible to extend the effectuation date if necessary.
Public comment was invited.
Stephanie Lorenz,4725 NE 4th St., Suite B, Renton, 98059, representing Mr.
Hudson, suggested that the City contact King County to verify that the
annexation has to be delayed in order to secure the project funds. She referred
to a project where King County funds were used for a passover in Magnolia, the
area of which was already annexed. Ms. Lorenz noted that the proponents are
frustrated with the annexation timeline and they want to move forward with
their projects.
Mayor Keolker indicated that the Administration will investigate the matter.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL: APPROVE
AN ORDINANCE EFFECTUATING THE 14.63-ACRE HUDSON
ANNEXATION ON 5/1/2007; APPROVE AN ORDINANCE REZONING 6.6
ACRES TO R-10 CONSISTENT WITH THE RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM
DENSITY LAND USE DESIGNATION; AND APPROVE AN ORDINANCE
REZONING 5.83 ACRES TO R-8 CONSISTENT WITH THE RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY LAND USE DESIGNATION. CARRIED. (See page 406
for ordinances.)
ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs
adopted as part of its business plan for 2006 and beyond. Items noted included:
� The 13th Annual Clam Lights display at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach
Park begins on December 1 and runs nightly through January 1.
� The official tree lighting event at Piazza Park occurs on December 2.
� A project to improve Rainier Ave. between S. 2nd St. and S. 4th Pl. has
been awarded$1,906,200 in funding for 2008 by the Transportation
� Improvement Board. The project is part of the overall improvements to the
Hardie/Rainier corridor, and includes replacing the Burlington Northern
Santa Fe railroad bridges, and pedestrian and transit improvements.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Inez Petersen, PO Box 1295, Renton, 98057, stated that although eliminating
Citizen Comment: Petersen- the use of eminent domain and non-conforming properties in the Highlands area
2006 Comprehensive Plan came about prior to the formation of the Highlands Zoning Task Force, the task
Amendments,Highlands Area force succeeded in the ability to remodel existing duplexes and to have mother-
in-law apartments. l�Is. Petersen displayed a map of the Highlands area,and
November 20,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 402
, compared the zoning from the original subarea plan to the recommended zoning
of the task force,noting the density similarities between the two plans. Ms.
Petersen expressed concern regarding the high densities proposed for the area,
including the allowance of three- to five-story buildings, saying that high
densities should not be supported without a proper EIS (Environmental Impact
Statement). She urged Council to consider requiring an EIS.
Citizen Comment: O'Halloran- Mike O'Halloran,Airport Advisory Committee Chair, 4420 SE 4th St., Renton,
Airport Open House, Master 98059, issued an invitation to the Renton Airport Open House on November 21,
Plan Update at which citizens can ask questions and discuss future options for the airport.
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing. At Councilman Persson's request, item 6.b. was removed for separate
consideration.
Appeal: Linn Office City Clerk reported appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the Linn
Conversion Landscape Office Conversion Landscape Variance; appeal filed by Alden Linn, 2907 Park
Variance, V-06-108 Ave. N. Renton, 98056, accompanied by required fee. Refer to PlanninQ and
Development Committee.
Finance: Fiber Optic Finance and Information Services Department recommended approval of an
Installation Projects Interlocal interlocal agreement regarding the sharing of fiber optic installation projects
Agreement, Eastside Fiber with the Eastside Fiber Consortium(various eastside agencies)to add Bellevue
Consortium Community College as a participating agency. Council concur. (See page 405
for resolution.)
Budget: 2006 Year-End Finance and Information Services Department recommended approval of the
Amendments 2006 year-end budget amendment ordinance. Refer to Finance Committee.
Plat: Monterey Place II,NE Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions, of the Monterey
16th St,PP-06-104 Place II Preliminary Plat; two single-family lots on a 0.26-acre site located at
2008 NE 16th St. Council concur.
Utility: 2007 Rates Utility Systems Division submitted proposed changes to the water, wastewater,
and surface water utility rates. Refer to Committee of the Whole.
MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL APPROVE THE
CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED TO REMOVE ITEM 6.b. FOR
SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. CARRIED.
Separate Consideration Community Services Department recommended approval to transfer the lease
Item 6.b. and concession agreement with All My Restaurants, Inc. for the restaurant and
Community Services: banquet facilities at Maplewood Golf Course to Newcastle Restaurants, Inc.
Maplewood Golf Course (Arias-Barajas, Inc.) for the remaining three years of the existing lease.
Restaurant Facilities Lease, MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL APPROVE
Transfer to Newcastle THE AGREEMENT ADDENDUM WITH A CORRECTION TO PAGE 1,
Restaurants, LAG-03-003 ITEM 2., LINE 3 AS FOLLOWS: REPLACE THE WORD "shall" WITH THE
WORD "may." CARRIED. Mayor Keolker noted that the agreement will be
returned to the concerned parties to determine if they accept the change.
Added Correspondence was read from James A. Fenner and Carolyn R. Fenner,402
� CORRESPONDENCE Seneca Ct. NW,Renton, 98057, concerning stormwater runoff through their
Citizen Comment: Fenner- yard and into their basement as a result of the development on an adjacent
Stormwater Drainage property located at 84th Ave. S. and S. 128th St. MOVED BY CORMAN,
Problems, Seneca Ct NW SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE
TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED.
November 20,2006 Renton City Council Miriutes Page 403 `
UNFINISHED BUSINESS Utilities Committee Chair Clawson presented a report recommending
Utilities Committee concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the proposed amendments
Utility: Public Works to the public works construction permit fees (Water Construction Permits,
Construction Permit Fees Water Meter Installations, Water Meter Processing, and Wastewater and
� Surface Water Construction Permits)and incorporate them into an ordinance.
The Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter
be presented for first reading. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY
BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
(See page 406 for ordinance.)
Utility: WRIA 8 8c 9 Salmon Utilities Committee Chair Clawson presented a report regarding the Water
Habitat Plan Implementation, Resource Inventory Area(WRIA) 8 and WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan
Interlocal Agreements interlocal agreements. The Committee recommended concurrence in the staff
recommendation to approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk
to execute the interlocal agreements between the City and other jurisdictions
participating in the implementation of the WRIA 8 and WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat
Plans for the time period of 2007-2015. MOVED BY CLAWSON,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR 1N THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 406 for resolution.)
Plannin�&Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report
Committee regarding the 2007 Comprehensive Plan pre-applications and requests. The
Comprehensive Plan: 2007 Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve
Amendments, Pre-Applications the request for pre-application review for Application 2007-Pre-01, Alan
Kunovsky's request for review of land use designation at 326 Park Ave.N., and
Application 2007-Pre-02, O'Farrell Properties LLC's request for land use
designation and multi-family policy review at 188 Hardie Ave. SW, iricluding
four parcels of contiguous property between Rainier Ave. S.,Hardie Ave. S.,
and SW Victoria St.
The Committee further recommended that these applications be forwarded to
the Planning Commission for inclusion in the 2007 work program pending
successful completion of an application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment
by 12/15/2006. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSQN,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Development Services: Private Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report
Stormwater Utilities in regarding private stormwater utilities in geologically hazardous areas. The
Geologically Hazardous Areas Committee met to discuss the proposed revision to the critical areas regulations,
which would exempt new surface water discharges from private storm systems
on steep slopes. Currently,public surface water discharges are allowed to
discharge on or near steep slopes in order to improve slope stability. However,
private stormwater systems are not permitted to discharge, even when such
utilities would reduce erosion and improve slope stability.
� The Committee recommended that a public hearing regarding the proposed
amendments be held by the City Council on 12/4/2006. MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
Development Services: Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report
Wireless Communication recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the City
Facilities in Residential Zones Code amendments to permit wireless communication facilities within public
rights-of-way within residential zones and adopt the ordinance. MOVED BY
BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 407 for ordinance.)
� November 20,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 404
Comprehensive Plan: 2006 Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report
Amendments regarding the 2006 Comprehensive Plan amendments, concurrent rezonings,
and implementing zoning text amendments.�The Committee recommended
concurrence in the staff and Planning Commission recommendation to approve
the 2006 Comprehensive Plan amendments as shown on the matrix entitled
"2006 Comprehensive Plan Amendments" and on the Report and
Recommendation of the Highlands Area Citizen's Zoning Task Force (dated
11/8/2006) with the following changes from the original recommendations:
1) Application 2006-M-6, Map Amendment for the Highlands Study Area—
The area known as "the tail" on Harrington Ave. NE between NE 9th St.
and NE 7th St. to be shown in the Comprehensive Plan as Center Village
with multi-family zoning in order to comply with adopted mapping criteria
for multi-family land use.
2) Report and Recommendation of the Highlands Task Force,Zoning Text
Amendments—Notes and conditions section of Title IV will include a
zoning use note restricting commercial office uses on properties fronting
Edmonds Ave.NE, Sunset Blvd., and NE 12th St.
3) Application 2006-M-3, Rivera—The zoning use table in the R-14 zone will
include a zoning use note restricting signage for commercial uses in the R-
14 zone to monument signs.
The applicants and the land use map/text amendment requests listed on the 2006
Comprehensive Plan Amendments matrix,are as follows:
• 2006-M-1 —Wan Chee; Map amendment to change Neighborhood
Commercial/Single Family to Neighborhood Commercial.
• 2006-M-2—Susan Larson-Kinzer; Map amendment to change Kennydale
Blueberry Farm from Residential Low Density to Residential Single
Family.
• 2006-M-3 —Manuel Rivera; Map amendment to change Residential Single
Family to Commercial Corridor.
• 2006-M-4—Springbrook Associates; Map amendment to change
Residential Medium Density to Commercial Corridor.
• 2006-M-5 —City of Renton; Map amendment to change Puget Colony from
Residential Single Family to Residential Low Density.
• 2006-M-6—City of Renton; Map amendment for the Highlands Study Area.
• 2006-M-7—City of Renton; Map amendment to change the former Aqua
Barn site from Neighborhood Business in King County's Comprehensive
Plan to Commercial Corridor to be consistent with Renton's Comprehensive
Plan.
• 2006-M-8—City of Renton; Map amendment to consider changing the
designation for a 49-acre area of upper Kennydale, south of NE 28th St. and �
NE 16th St. from I-405 to approximately the boundary of the Heritage Glen
Subdivision from Residential Single Family with R-8 zoning to Residential
Low Density with R-4 zoning.
• 2006-T-1 —City of Renton; Text amendment to update the Capital Facilities
Element to incorporate adoption of the Issaquah and Kent school district
Capital Facilities Plans.
• 2006-T-2—City of Renton; Text amendment to update the Land Use
Element to reflect changes in the Center Village.
• 2006-T-3 —City of Renton; Text amendment to Land Use and Community
Design elements with housekeeping changes.
November 20,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 405 �
• 2006-T-4—City of Renton; Text amendment to update the Transportation
Element to reflect changes in capital projects.
• � 2006-T-5—City of Renton; Text amendment to update the Land Use
Element to allow Residential Manufactured Home zoning to be an
implementing zone with the Residential Low Density Comprehensive Plan
designation.
The Committee further recommended that the development agreement for
application 2006-M-7 (former Aqua Barn site)be referred to the City Attorney
for review and approval,and that the Mayor be authorized to execute the
agreement upon approval by the City Attorney.
The Committee further recommended that Application 2006-T-5 and
Application 2006-M-2 be held in Committee until resolution of the pending
SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act) appeal on these issues. MOVED BY
BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT.*
Referring to the amendment concerning the upper Kennydale area(2006-M-8),
Councilman Clawson pointed out that the Committee agreed with the staff
recommendation to downzone the area to R-4, and not with the Planning
Commission recommendation to keep the existing R-8 zoning. He noted the
environmental constraints of the area, and the need to balance the rights of area
residents and the rights of those who want to develop.
*MOTION CARRIED.
Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval of
Finance: Vouchers Claim Vouchers 253809-254369 and four wire transfers totaling
$8,923,702.22; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 66410 - 66587, one wire
transfer, and 641 direct deposits totaling$2,015,422.36. MOVED BY
PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Community Services: Park Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report regarding the 2006 Budget
Fund Budget Increase, Staffing amendments for intermittent parks and recreation staffing expenses. The
Expenses Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve
the transfer of$35,000 from the General Fund to Fund 101 to offset increased
overtime and labor costs incurred due to weather related crowd control and the
extended Sockeye season.
The Committee further recommended that the budget amendment ordinance
regarding this matter be presented for first reading. MOVED BY PERSSON,
SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 406 for ordinance.)
RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption:
ORDINANCES
Resolution #3841 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and Citv Clerk to enter into an
Finance: Fiber Optic interlocal agreement, entitled "Addendum#27 for Sharing of Fiber Optic
Installation Projects Interlocal Installation Projects," with the City of Bellevue, City of Kirkland, City of
Agreement,Eastside Fiber Renton, Lake Washington School District, Renton School District, University
Consortium of Washington, Bellevue School District, and Evergreen"Hospital, to provide an
alternative to the King County I-Net and to better serve additional areas within
the City of Renton. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, .
COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
' November 20,2006 . Renton City Council Minutes Page 406.
� Resolution#3842 � A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and Citv Clerk to execute
Utility: WRIA 8 &9 Salmon interlocal agreements among participating jurisdictions with the
Habitat Plan Implementation, Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Resource Inventory Area
Interlocal Agreements (WRIA 9) and the Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish Watershed Resource
Inventory Area(WRIA 8). MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY
BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. GARRIED.
. The following ordiriances were presented for first reading and referred to.the
Council meeting of 11/27/2006 for second and final reading:
Annexation: Hudson,.Benson An ordinance was read annexing approximately 14.63 acres of property.
Rd S & S 168th St generally located west, south, and east of the existing City of Renton boundaries
. defined by a peninsula of land immediately east of 108th Ave. SE, and south of
SE 168th St. (Hudson). MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE,
COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL
READING ON 11/27/2006. CARRIED.
Annexation: Hudson, R-8 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification for approximately
Zoning . 5.83 acres, located in two sections, the smallest some 2.02 acres; on the south
side of SE 168th St. in the easternmost part of the annexation, and the largest,
some 3.81 acres;ori the west side of 108th Ave. SE, in the northernmost portion
of the annexation site;annexed within the City of Renton from R-18 (Urban
Residential- 18 dwelling units per acre,King County zoning), R-12 (Urban
Residential- 12 dwelling units per acre,King County zoning)and R-8 (Urban .
Residential- 8 dwelling units per acre, King County zoning)to R-8 (8 dwelling
units per net acre,Renton zoning); Hudson. MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR
SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 11/27/2006. CARRIED.
Annexation: Hudson, R-10 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification for approximately.
Zoning. 6.6 acres, located in two sections,the smallest some 1.9 acres, on the western
side of 108th Ave. SE, and the largest, some 4.7 acres, on the east side of 108th.
Ave. SE,both south of SE 168th St., if extended; annexed within the City of
Renton from R-18 (Urban Residential - 18 dwelling units per acre,King County
zoning),R-12 (Urban Residential- 12 dwelling units per acre, King County
zoning) and R-8 (Urban Residential- 8 dwelling units per acre,King Gounty
zoning)to R-10 (10 dwelling units per net acre, Renton zoning); Hudson.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE
ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 11/27/2006.
CARRIED.
Community Services: Park An ordinance was read amending the 2006 Budget to authorize $35,000 from
Fund Budget Increase, Staffing increased revenues to offset increased overtime and labor costs due to weather
Expenses related crowd control and the extended Sockey,e season. MOVED BY LAW,
SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR
SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 11/2712006. CARRIED.
Utility: Public Works An ordinance was read amending Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement,
Construction Permit Fees of Title IV(Development Regulations) of City Code by increasing public works
construction permit fees. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY
BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND F1NAL
READING ON 11/27/2006. CARRIED.
November 20,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 407
� De�elopment Services: An ordinance was read amending Chapters,2,4, and 11 of Title IV
Wireless Communication (Development Regulations) of City Code by permitting wireless communication
Facilities in Residential Zones facilities within public rights-of-way in residential areas and to incorporate three
pre-existing administrative determinations that clarify the wireless regulations.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFERTHE
' ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 11/27/2006.
CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL REFER THE
Transportation: Downtown ISSUE OF CONNECTIVITY TO DOWNTOWN FROM THE LANDING
Connectivity to The Landing, AND DIRECTION SIGNAGE FOR DOWNTOWN TO THE
Downtown Direction Signage TRANSPORTATION(AVIATION) COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Finance: Business License MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL REFER A
Billing Cycle BRIEFING ON THE NEW BUSINESS LICENSE BILLING CYCLE TO
FINANCE COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Inez Petersen,PO Box 1295, Renton, 98057, inquired as to which fund the$1.5 .
Citizen Comment: Petersen- million set aside for Highlands study area infrastructure improvements is in.
Various Regarding the Comprehensive Plan amendment concerning the upper
Kennydale area, Ms. Petersen expressed concern that citizens were not given the
opportunity to speak publicly on the matter and the decision to adopt R-4
zoning was a result of a staff recommendation. y
Councilman Clawson clarified that the decision was based on more than the
staff recommendation, and he pointed out that public hearings were held on the
matter.
Continuing,Ms. Pete.rsen inquired as to how Highlands Community Association
events such as the upcoming Christmas dance can be City-sponsored. On
another topic, Ms. Petersen"stated that City staff did not grant Jeff Colee a fence
height variance, and he must remove the fence he erected to keep cats out of his
backyard. Noting that Mr. Colee is wheelchair-bound, she pointed out that the
ADA(Americans with Disabilities Act)requires cities to modify their zoning to
accommodate the disabled.
Stating that he read the staff decision, City Attorney Larry Warren explained
that staff has criteria on when a variance may be granted that has been
established by the Council. He indicated that the fence did not meet the
standards as established by City Code, and that the original reason for Mr.
Colee to build the over-height fence no longer exists, as the adjacent neighbor
who was responsible for the cat problem has now moved.
Citizen Comment: Lorenz- Stephanie Lorenz, 13515 SE Maple Valley Rd., Renton, 98058,expressed
Tree Hazard, Maple Valley concern that cottonwood trees growing on the sloughing slope along Maple
Hwy . Valley Hwy., west of Riverview Park and east of the former Stoneway Concrete
Plant site,may fall across the road and hurt someone. MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE
ADMINISTR.ATION. CARRIED.
Citizen Comment: McOmber- Howard McOmber,475 Olympia Ave. NE,Renton, 98056, asked that the City
Various review Jeff Colee's fence situation(discussed by previous speaker Petersen),as
the problem does not seem to be totally solved. Mr. McOmber also issued an
invitation to the Highlands Community Association's Christmas party,which
will be held on December 16.
" Councilman Clawson pointed out that Jeff Colee can appeal the staffs decision.
' November 20,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 408
� ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADJOURN.
CARRIED. Time: 8:36 p.m.
- ►C�n�.��.�. GJa.�,��
Bonnie I. Wa�ton, CMC, City Clerk �
Recorder: Michele Neumann
November 20, 2006
RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR ' �
- a Office of the City Clerk •
. COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
November 20, 2006
COMMITTEE/GHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COLTNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP WED., 11/29 2007 Budget Deliberations
9 a.m. to 1 p.m. *Council Conference Room*
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 11/27 2007 Budget Presentations and
(Corman) 5 p.m. Deliberations
COMMUNITY SERVICES
(Nelson)
FINANCE MON., i 1/27 Vouchers;
(Persson) 4 p.m. Pam Curley Reconnection Fee
PLANNING &DEVELOPMENT
(Briere)
PUBLIC SAFETY
(Law)
TR.ANSPORTATION (AVIATION)
(Palmer) �
UTILITIES
(Clawson)
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings aze held.in the Counci]Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Counci]
Conference Room unless othenvise noted.
' � Exhibit C
�
��n� c���,ty
Department of Assessments ►.�COtt NOble'
King County Administration Bldg. f�SSeSSOY
500 Fourth Avenue,Room 708
Seattle,WA 98104-2384
(20�296-5195 FAX(Z0�Z96-0595
Emall:assessor.info@metrokc.gov
ww�v.metrokc.gov/assessor/
� ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION
THIS IS TO CERTTFY that the petition submitted September 18, 2006
to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson,
Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to
Renton of the properties described as the Aster Park Annexation,
have been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and
assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with
- the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination,
found to be sufficient under the provisions of the Revised Code of
Washington, Section 35A.01.040.
The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature
on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual
signatures,nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an.
appropriate time frame,,and t.his document does not certify such to
be the case.
Dated this 20�of September, 2006
���� ���
Scott Noble, Kin County Assessor
' �.��1202M . . '• ,. . . .
' , EX�llblt D
ASTER PARK ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23
North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying southerly of the northerly
right-of-way margin of NE Sunset Blvd (State Route 900, SE Renton-Issaquah Rd,
Primary State Highway No. 2);
EXCEPT that portion of said right-of-way lying northeasterly of the existing City Limits
of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 5069; and
EXCEPT the east 30 feet for road.
EX�11�JJlt �
Please see attached packet for Assessor's Maps.
--r�i� '
J, ` �
�
, �
C7
� �
� � Q�
�
_ �
��
-a--�
�
, �
�'� d
� ��
;; � 5e �
�
> �
�
� �
�
� �
I
�
113th
; z
�
�
.� E 14 S
�
�-
0
� � _
� NE 10th St E 10 h
S
�
�
�
� 117 h t
�
�t
>
� Q
�
Ast�r Park A�1n�X�tiOn o soo l000
Exhibit F1: Proposed Annexation Boundary ,
s —�— Cit Limits 1 : 6���
�O„;, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning y
�� � Alex Pietsch,Administrator � � Proposed Annex.Area
C.E.Feascl
�'ANTo 25 January 2007
==__-_-_____==___-__-.-_=____._______._ ______--___=-___-_=-=-- o
_-___________________________________________________________._-_ �
________________.________________:__________ o .
, _
�
� �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
.
:�
.
;
; =__-__-_
; _____ ___________________________ _
Aster Park Annexation
0 5000 10000
Exhibit F2: Existing Corporate Limits
�t� o„� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning ��— City Limits. 1 . 60000
*O� C�ExFeaselh,Adminiso-ator � ProposedAnnex..Area
�L•' .p0$ 25 January 2007 � �
I ' __"____" __'__________ _ ""_____"__-
I ________ _'_ '_"____" __ . _ _"___ ____ .
I _____ ______ ______ "-_' ___ _"_"__ _ _ . .
I _----__---_-"_-'_ ____ __ __ _ _ -" ' .
" _'--"-_" " __ _'___- __ _ '_ '_ __'"_ .Z "
I -_"_ _'__'___ __"""_ _____'_ '__ "" ___" �
I ______'_____'" _' '______""' _'__'__ _ "" �
' __________________'___""_'_'_'"_ __ "_-"___"___"_ _ o
i _--��---_ "_ _"_ "_ _ _ __'_-' __'- �
.. _ ____"_""__" "____. ��
i '--_'' � 9 ���
2
" a € _
Z E
� o
R�� NE 4ih S1. SE 12B St
�
� ���, A�S Ai�ort Wo HE3�d . � .
���th�k o cF
� 5 2nd St .y .
i �P
a `y
qp 9a
0
i �/
• SW lth 5�
: '2 gf
I � SW�md WaY
� Renlon�Ilag .
; � s
I �`S'
Sq,fh o`
i� �e��er glvd �
QJ4
�
� TukwBa kwy y 167
� 181 �
j Stronder Bivd ' -
I em
� s N � 515 Wn
I 3 a �
� � y SW 34 A 5(
� 3 `� —
SE Pelmvilsky Rd
SW/1s1 SL
' S 179
S 180th SW 4Jrd SL S 4
eD
¢ J�
- �o�
/ 3 ___
< -- .�oy -_____=`-==-------==-
-_ ,�yo9s __'------ --------------
. ___ `p�le _' ___'_ '___'.'"_
�ster P�r� �nn�Xatiot� o s000 l0000
Exhibit F3: Major Streets and Major Physical Features
�t� o Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning ��— City Limits � • �0000
+�a Alex Pietsch�Administrator
C.E.Fcasel � 0 Proposed Annex.Area
��NT�Z ZS January 2007 � � '
:_=-=-=-----=--=--==-=-======- --==�=_=_-__:-:___ I .. ,-
�_______________�_===_==_.."" ___-___._-_____-_ -
k_=:=::-__-_____________` =__-=____======
�_______=_===_=-__-- ="-_==__='=___ — -
�-=-==-=--------"__=___- __"_-_________
�__.-_"=-_-_=-:-:=_:_::_ __-==--"-: _ _
E.::::..:..::.::.....:::..:: _::::___:__:_=_: D
�____:____________________________ :___--=__-_______
�____________________-________=_.____._____ _-__=_=_==-____._.___=-
�_______________________________-.____-____ =_-______-__________=
-=_==_===__=======__===-=_==_===:==__=_=__.=-____-#_____`_-__:=_ STATIO
� -____________________-___==_-==_-=_=_---__-_-__________-.-
i -__________________=__===_______:====-='=_=___-==_==_______
_______________________________________= 12
-__=_:____________________=___=_______=______: ,
� _____-__-_.=-___________________-____--
�
' S ATION
' - 11
i °
�
�
�
�
! STATION
' :,
0
; 16
�
;
! STATION
�
�
13 '
;
' STAT ON -
4
.
' �ire District 40
;
; - :_-
--____`==___- C�
F�i __e D i s t r i c t 3 7 =-==-=--=--=`===__
; _=_- ___________ _______
, -_- -=---_____=___=
Aster Park Annexation o S000 �0000
Exhibit F4a: Fire Service Area Boundaries
� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning ��— City Limits � . �0000
�.♦ Alex Pietsch,nam�n;sna�� Proposed Annex.Area
C.E.Feasel 0
� q0 25 January 2007 - . � . . ,
�_:__=__::_-=�=_-__==--� _.:-__:__-�-_--=
k[-===-=--=-----=--------- _-:---___-__-
k_:'_______________�__==-__ _=--==_"_______- _ .
€=________________________== __=-___-___=_=_ COAL CREEK�
k=====_===_=_=_=___":_=_=_=-=-=- --------=-=--- �
F==-==-==----===-=-=-==`_=:_=__-=____._ -====-=======:_=__= � UTILITY DISTRICT
�_____=___�_________________=_____=__-- _=___:=___________-=__= caz�z3sszoo� .
�____________________ _____:=-_-_=_"-__=_=___=_=_-__:_==:__"____=__=_____
i ----=-----==-=--=-=--==-----==- _________________.______ -
� -_______________________ --_--=--=_=-
� _______________=__===_______==_____-- _--===___:_====_====- -
____________________=___=_____::==__:- ___-___==___=__=__= � �
------------------------ ------------ COAL CREEK
__:==____-__-=_`:____=--____=___===-- _:_________________= WATER 8 SEWER DIST.
________________________________________ :__-__==-__-__=___=-_-__=- ass�ool
BRYN MAWR - �-=____::_===:_�_=--_===_=_====-=�====_=_== CI
� LAKERIDGE --=---==---=-=----==-----__:___-____-=
WATER 8� --======-------____-_
� SEWER DIST. -_---__- __-_
� ��
� SKYWAY WATER AT6t DISTRICT 90
AND SEWER
DISTRICT p
i vhna,�
i ��
1
i A1H D�f. gA7� -
� WA18t�IDQ
;I
0
:j
I
i
ASMETA 1
AID tRIBI
�
AK.A
1 ' . MAlIEWOOD AOOIIION
I . WA1R COdRAIIVE
i ��
i bl l 1
� OF C�AR RIVBt
' TIACWIIA WATHt AI�
; SEWHt DIST.
. �
��
;
.
i
i
i SOOS qtEBC
WAT9t AND
i SEW9t DISTRICT
au�n :
� CITY '
! OF
KENT -_==_==_-=-
aaaool -___=__"______
Aste r Pa rk An n exati o n o 4soo 9000
Exhibit F4c: Water Service Area Boundaries ' '
ti� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning ��— City Limits 1 . 54000
�O` Alcx Pietsch�Administrator . . .
C.E.Feasel � Proposed Annex.Area
�NTO 25 January 2007 . . .
____=_________________.:-___ _.________-____====-= o ..
_______________________._________________._-__==_==___________ �
_______________________________________=__.___ � �
==________________________________:_____= o �
_______________________________=-- � �
0
0
�
�
,
.
.
�
=__._ ! �
-______:� �
I =--- ��� _
� ____________________ Q .
.
Aster Park Annexatlon o s000 l0000
Exhibit F5: K.C. UGA and Renton PAA . -
�ti'� Economio Development,Neighborhoods&Svategic Planning ��— City Limits 1 • 60000
�� � Alcx Pietsch,ndminisaator 0 Proposed Annex.Area
C.E.Fcasel
�gNT� ZS lanuary 2007 . . .
:-_______=____________________ _=_--____--__=__ �;
=---=_-----=--=------- __-__-_-_-_- , .
I =_:__=______________________ _____=-__-____:"=-
i =_=-__=_�==="====_=_== -=-=___:— ____________ __ ___
� ______________==__:__=_ =- -=-=- -"_____=="_=__=_-= O
� ---=-____======_=___________________________:=.____-____-:_-:__=-=-____:
� _ __________________________________________________________
__:____________:_.=_____________=:_::_=-_=-_ �
�
�
�
i O
i
i
�
�
O
�
i
� .
�
i , .
�
I
1
�
�
�
� -
I
i ' _- _____ ____ _______________
Aster Park Annexation o S000 l0000
Exhibit G: Proposed Corporate Limits
1S Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �-- City Limits 1 . �O�oo
�O� Alex Pietsch,nam;n;stra�oT Pro osed Annex.Area �
C.E.Feasel 0 P
NTO 25 Januaury 2007 • � . . .
�::�•.:•�-.i:::.::�::' :�•...-)
' _ _:.^ _ �:16 C":vx'�"•:�': �:�j�.•:;`�.P,1^�::�elr:'.
_ :`is�f�G�':v. :}'•'� n.;:�:^^•::::•:•i4i�LV. t�•.�:•.�I
_ ����'��i��{ p �
_ .i,��u:�F�;fT:•:'Ti8•'t'ii:::#'ti_'i;c?��::S:�a>:::•::::>:::::•::
�■- - _ s:�T.}.�.�_.:.:.p:.;_..�:.:�.::::::::c•:a:-�:�Fi�����:i::<:�::;.:;:.
'
- �L_.......a�,.;.::u.:
�r -
.
'
.;i�"
'
�:��.
:`.s:
�;4:
� >:�::
f:N}:•i'i�4:titi$�i':�i�
-
�
�N.I
[ 4. �
e���
.
� J�:�:
,
k (.�:•:���•::•:���::�:Ju
•�:�.
' C•:? f::}..
s h.:,:�
.
t::.
..�:. .�
o Y.i�::
...{
3 :{�{{}A.'i}.
.
<'}1�:2.'?v'r�'.•"?'.':'r'4:ti4}}:4:-i?i>.
. .
� ..........;;y.... ti...... ..::::.....
•��'•%�i'�k'?r<:�:•:f?j$::
��al vi:•::�}:•,'1•�,•+f:
.4
r:::ii::•:'V':.: :::.�.i:J:::. ...... ...
:•::�e:�
1
- ;_:3�.
'�:��� - ��
.
�:�: - -
_ �
.
_ �;:.,.,._,�
:,.,.:
�E.. �,::�
- �
.
..,.:,-re;
.-;r.s..�
"i.:... p
"�.'.,;
�
. •»G[;:}h',:;i:�v ji
:.t..: �
�;����i;;i•:;V•?x+?7:$��^'t'�'i,}'+�r`:y;';r']<•':i?`....,.:.'^::�?+�'.�r}'�.j'r�i�'�:::r���'�'•��'�F...{:r.
I ♦ / ��► _ :::.:�:�:.::�.�.:::::.: -�
rr, :::.:<>.F::<�<�:;:;;;:.
:.�.:
��F.::::::::::::::::::
♦
�
�
.
:::::�:::::::::�::::::::::::.::::::::::�:::::::::::::::::.:::r:::::::::::::::::�:..
�
� � .
�
�:::
_ .
,
0
�. �
�
.
� �
� �.�:_
.
_
. ::�f:�r::�:::,:.
� -
3.
}
.�
\ �' . ,.1 - �:^� r<i'�':.�'`'• .r.)•::.
;';::`'':`.'f;i:s?3?�i:%'.":fii;<`�''���'���i.i:%i:�:i'��.�"'':i�i:::'`:.?`$::<�:::'yj:;'•.''•;%;;;ji`;::.�i y:i
� - -
�r•.: - - - .Y��°.�i� -
.:�Sy��:7: - -
- :?�,a�f:
� -
�
�•:
:;:t;:�
:::�;:: ,
�� •.,:.
�:, "fi:•::r ��.
i h:s' - .7
.';:=^";;.
:�:;
,��i.
- ���r:a�:."
�� .;:���.
:'i�i;i���
�
s:• ;:y;z:$Si?i?;u.�;<i�:::.;:i`:;::;::�:•':�.:'.....i`�:y>:•::�'.ti:::�:
�'�"` �,•y'
.;,v.
'`s<� }.•:., .c.�:•.,
�
••s•:..
.;3:;;
r:•i::
� � .•"•::���::���
■ ���.=�`;.'�:�
. .tiaE::<:�:i%�::�a�::�:>it;�:`•:
::. ................
::. , :::::.::�:�••�:•�:
:.>„ ::::.:.:.:::.;:.
�-� � .:. : :::::::.:r<•:i:�:;
::.: , : .�:;.;�:..:.: .......... �.
� - ..�: :;:i`.�
' t::
?.7�:::
::✓.
2{k•'c
- �I
,j��.:i�.
�
r.dt•i �
t �.
. •✓'
�;1�:•i::'6:3•.':�.
�:.�.
- f:��i� ���'
�
� --
�::k�:
--- ..�S:fi�if>:;.;�:;F:il�i"<�;�i�'�'i;... .
��
� -
�' r:�
< �:::,..
.��::::::.TM�:�:::
. . :::�...
�
�
r
.
.
�-�.;:: .;�.::::::.:
�
.�.:t
•r.:.
+�:'t�:>:�::'t%?::;r.
`i;�;:.�;::•::t
};�;?[.
<•a:
� :i:�
�
c:��':::i::::i;';%i;::{::���i'�:'::>::�i�•r:+:::•;:r;:•sr:
.
�.'�-> <C�:. �
J
r
�:C�:
•.,:•::.�::•::•:::::::�::.�:::
"�'�::
� -
=:�
r:�::
�
.�:::
�::�.
::,:::.:::..::::::.::.::::.::.:::::..
�s
:::�::;:::.::�:::::::::�r:::::
..,r.�:.�::::�::::.�.::::
� ...�:.._
.
� � ��:.
i>j.::
"'ai:;?i:>;�:
''a• .�i•:...,r::_;:t
� �:•�
�;:;;:j:;:;::�:S;ii;:';y:�;i;;:ii
:`•.�•• ..�. j
:i F:i::•,•'•::::;i::i:<;f:::�:5?:::::
:c:.� :i:•::,:�':s::•:;r:t:4i.:a;t;•::•��t.. i:i::i3ii;:;i�$:;�..
.. :,..::. .�.:.�::.>:::<::::>::<:�:::::::::::<:::>:::;A: ��
� i � ��:� -
°����>:� -
::�.,:�..�_.:.,...::r.:..::..:;;;«.- �
� � ::�:::-- ;:�:� :�..
_ y �
. �.
.:,.
�. �i
L\•:• 'i�i: a
�'G:-'�F�`.:3•.�.'.::YtiS�'u:'�
�:•: �'(•:�:•Lv :,vr^.u. �
� / j ::�.
' ����,���
:{�..
V'. %�I.'•
r I' -
i:;�i:t:}:
ti:
j.;:%�:�?'�:�'m+��:
I
� . ;r:: ;:�;;::?;'.•. .•r�e.
� .'l'•�'�`•..
:��6�� �i��:: :F:.;•.:•.:: >_7;,
:Z �
::��: :•.3.::`��� �:�.�
:.��:;,� \ -'
:.^,a:•�;.,
/
:_•.3-: •.30..:•.
•.:•��<2i;•,;t�:.:
■ ��` .�::. :.:,.:::::::::::�
�..� , :�,�._...:.�. .:,::...�,::::::�::::::;:::.. :�:::��
� ���-.>.:.� ::�:::.:�. ::�:;:..<.:
>,:. �.:����.:,:> �:;��
� � ...�::.<.. .��:::�::: :;:=
, :�E::�.::;:�.:��;�;�:a��. `.
�:�>�>��
ry..._.:..._::.�;�.
::.:.___::_.�.:.
.�
.::.:: ..::::.
� ::�:;::��:>::::�:<�:':::::>:::.:.;����:<:::.:«:<:�--:::>-m-�-:<:::-»;}�T:::>::>;:.:.:......:::::�T::n,.
� �� �:- -- .m�� _ ,� ��
::::::i::.:::�:�:.
.
�
4�....
�:;�. �
� :::�.
:�f�:-;:::�::::::::::::����:�::::,::::�::::::_
::�:�.. �:.�...
.}....
:�
� :� �:::::::::.:::::::�.
.::_:��..:
:.�.
:�:::...::: .:,::;::_.
1 _
,.: s:
k��:S�:i::��
•:1f•::m•�•r..
•:� •�
�.
1 �:#:�:�'-::i`::�' '
,
� �t�t:�
z.2'..
.
' a:i::;?::::_;::•.
� :.�:;y.t`'•,:.� -
i
:.�:. :._�:.:..:. �.�;�: :�
a:::::>::<::>
F:. ..�.::::::
�
I ::�F.<::::
..�:
�
,`: :r::>:::>:>�::::_..-:..:
� -
�::�
����`::
:��::>::
.
'
:<,>:
s�:�`::, i :�:<:::::>:«<::
<I
:::�-:::::..:.�
:f.;;���>::�':�>:���:..
.
<>IE....
•.i
•,�.:;:"c'."; .
�
:�:�:��:,>;�:��:
s::�. �
/
■
■
.
�
�
::���:
::::��::
�:,,::�::::::::::::�
r
- .`•:•C.•:t.
,i
.
•�ff:'+.
-�.s��.fi:
�i'i•:?
.E.?
�[�i•
:d:+
�
-
' "t2' "f';i'��t>;>:i'•':ti�
:t���:: ..i�::.
.?:l�s;';'i
::\':�'?:•.
:.:..:.:..:::::::::::::�: ::::.;•.
-,E;•.','.'::�f`y`••,`:?'�'"?ji;#;:;;:`;::<;:.:;x::?�.:+:;i.:,a:.
:�':'::',t:?;?;':;'?iS���:'.'::'�i�ir?';?i?''i'ii:j'.�
,,�;;;;
-- .�:�.
:�
ii�z
:::i:i::
.�:�:i ;:S'�:;i; i y:;::
..�::
5`i i:
d,.
�::•74'•}i}$:vrr-.•Wi::•}:C
`.�:•:'"%�'
:}��'�i�•?�•:'�:i�•:'�'•X:•J::��•:�:
:i�:;::•.}i. :V}:::...�
:�Vi'•i::}�+}
•I.t.
'•}�1`:�
.
y:;:.•��ti{:!::�:$V{;:�:�;;���5:;�:`���l
::•A';•;:�•:ti{�:�:•:•:�.}'J::•::•:J:i�•"•:•'•:'�:i::���•::v�:::•.Vr
'1.'�'v
titi��<ti y�
��:%T:+vii::::
:: ' a:.;}.,'^.��
'•$�iv�i:•i::v:•i:::•:i:•:4i$i:•:i�'ii::ii:•:i{�i}�:•:G
ti{�''•'•:'•{.'':;:;:y.Y;•�i'
�}
v�J:...
.�........................
�.J T
�'F::} „'Yii:}'..,
.•tw:r
- �
:;F•::
- :?•�i::v:•••••��:•:�':i1v:•:ti!:v:::4:i'l:i:i:ii'�4::ii'!:•?:-:'i:ii:•iYf:•:•:•
:+e>�:;:•'.:'r:::::.
,
SSt::,':•:i•'••
+�,, :�
::.•/
::�,+.
n�%�. /
fi�'?:s'•:.,
T�i?#��2:�»'i3i$''f:•`•:�:3:'rr?�i�:�:%':'•�k'?��3::',:::i':?i�:;'+.':.G:C�:?;�i;a;;:::;:4�i::.
•.L
?at�::
3
• ::•::::.: .;......
�•:: ..�................ �::.'''f
;�,...,.:
�
::��;:
..�
:.�:.
.:.�..
::.:,�..
::�:::::::::>::::r.::..
.>
.�.<
:::��:::::>::. .t...
::1:::::::::�::::::::::::::::::>::::,:::::>:::: ::.y_
F+
:c:�:;t•'•:,:::.:::•,.
..�...
,�,:.^:;;:�_.;.
:�•�.: .,t�
- :�''.
,..t:•F•:.:..
ti:�..:.:
�.:::.. -..
••:,.�;:i:;::u;:;i;;:�:�,•,.
,�;.�:
�o-iii;:fi:S':.
<•':�it:;:
:�..
f.
•.:i•?::�::4:':
�:�3�?�i'?.. .F::i::?�::•:... ..t:::;.;;•:>'
..;✓
i t,;.
/ i
f
!•.�::�:;fS::�ffi:r ,�::;;'ttyf
f:i�: •:)'•::
.E i-::•::•. ..�y,..;..��.g•;:.
�:�':j`,,..,i;;..ii;i:��'``•,,::;:;+:::...::..............
.iiz,.
:�f'+:.
'+'�
•:ldi�?.
.y,:•;:�::;:;:;;;¢.:
;.�,;::SS.;:j,;::•s:r;at•:;:::•::...
�
I
;'`Y��:5:. .r/::i>:;;...
•..I•iii:ta�G.'•}A,
\a:�V1t?•i'- .F.:�ii•�''vi'i•'?:?�i:
�::::1::v':i4i:•:�i}}h:
.)
.:}..........
�:<�'ti�'•i}:4�'r
;���rr,.::.,
- !:�t. �rii}?i}i:i?:
::.r ::::�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�:.. . i ::�::::::..�
::�:::::::::::::::::::::.::...
.�a::.::
�::::: _
�E E:,'•? .1..
,�:•:.:`•:<::
•�::::;.:.:,..�::•::•::�:::•;;;
•::�:::;;:.;:::;:•::•»:•�•::•:::?�r ..,�,,,..r..........
. ......:........:.. ........
..1.........
�>
3� .,,_�,y.,.,..,,;;i:
:,�r.;.
F• i:3 .�•::::.;
�
;i:3'::;�;:i;;ii;fSi:j:::•`•i`i::'iif:;::rr':ar::•t::•::r.
:.Y:•:.
i::;�t:
Si��::�i�ii:E;;`v.>..,�,
:•;�•
�:o[
::F:�i ..t:
� -
::.J:.
:.3.;..,.,
•C::;•:•.:;.;,_.,o-;r,r:?;i;�:
,.ui;.�";�i;':;;;��i
•.Iv.:•..
"C
, ......:::•:::::::.�:•:::.�:::.�:::
•;F•i�:.�. :}\i'v:$:."'
�Ji
[�T�+�i� �
[:G�?�1 :91;ia..:..;•.....,
..�.,.
..l.
:aa:tt�''"I.•:;�:ii'
.�.,.....
3
- - ,�:::::.
:,•�......
,.;.:r::,-:-.`�:::�:::::::::::
:�:�._,....
�.•:�
.:;�:::::..
:.�:�>:
:,F;'�?::<'.:...�
•::;�
.,��;:<�::�..::::::.�.
.:,:.
.:-:��;:.:�s:::>;<:«•
•J
..�: ..:v...
��
,.�i?::',••;;•.
�:�••:
`:�`?;'�;?��.;;�':"'`�':�."'`..'.�',".'.;?;:;
"•�'.:.• •.•.r-.-�:-.,-.
- �=`:�:.
�'3•�:•::.w't::%
...!�RY,•2:+;r.•
- t':'�:+:'?:•:;•:ri;�f>:::::•:::i' �.;.;�::.,
.�r'::
- - ' •�. .:t,•ax:;•::>:
�:_,:.
•Ar.:::::•�. .�
.;�.::.:..
`•:��:;•��•.�:::•"�.^•.�:�:i...• :.�::••ri..
� .F...
.�.�..�
\....
.0 ?ii::.w::::.�
.;�'•.
���:::..
.,�,^.,'•
't r::t:�:it�:
:j�..':'��2'r;.;,;
�:.
-
;:`�++:;.`:;:i;���$.
.��::::::� ::✓i:::
•.v:� .,i'..
�`��;�:'::;f;}:::=. •:��:`''�i;�2i;.
::r'..
}.�tvSi:;:, .,�.
�:'y.': ::I'::'S'' .\.....
:}:.
:��'� a F.
�v:?i;:}.:i�:vi:S..
.::_�
:.g•;:�:::�::;::i'' %':;,/.;`.;`::::.<
.:`�;�••
�!�' .✓3.^•fi:;�i{:i:r.•::
�'� ?::�:C::.
f.......f.....
:'-;.',l:::., �•
•.f•:•::�::a::�`:'.+:''•`••`:`:.....
�;:.:::. :_�:
.�
Y:�=<..__..
::J
,i'r;:S9:%:
t.��:��;;t•::�'��5•:�;:: �:�:....� ::•:r'••:::?:•t::•>:,u.:...
�......�.:...:........
.\
i�;:<t;f::i�
. ::.:.:...... x•::�r:::o:::o::;�:::::.r::;
%i>1�r`fiS:::t;%�::'t;�>`:$:'r'::?i�:�?:?�i:ri::;:;:>;, . .f:::•:::.�:.:...
....•:::::.;:::,:
:.....::.::::•.
.;:::�:::::.;•.:
..:.;:.;•.:•.�.::. ...;;,:•:ua;r:;ti:::�:;5:;;y, . .:::
::��:a ro-:•:<�:�:::<•.:>::a•::...
;:�:;: -�i '.r::%: '•i•. ::�.> c.,J.. :�•.
.�i+:•:iii4i:ii}
'E'::.::%>:.
<r:.:
:�:::
_:��::•::.>:::.s;� ..�
�.�::
:::�: ..a.
��:�<::::<>:�::::�:::
_::�::.,
• ;:)::>:::.:;;:<..:.
;�:>
,�:.
.�.
>:;:�':<.»>:::::::.::.;:
°:�:�.,;:::>:::.>;:::�;�:';:::,�;:':r�:;:
.�..
.�:`>«:��:::.
:,_: ..F..��.0
��:. :�: .:�
..�-.:::>�:>::::>:<:>:>:„„:;:::�:�:»>:::>:<:>:::>
��:._
ti...�.._..-vy:-:...............� �::�.;:-
���� .._:-..................
::��..
:.��<:������
::���<::�:`::.
�
't;::;<:<::>:::�'::`:�::�<:�:�>«;:;:::��_�>:::�:::':::
,::�:;:::::::;:.y::::�::<:::;:
.�:.:
>;::::�::;::<.
..._, .,��.:::.:
�:.
..� �_
_ ��.�<.;::::.:�: ��....
- - <:�
��.:_.m::.��
.:�:<:.:;:.�:..::.:�:::::-<.�-:>::.::;.:<:::::::;r
-
.��:<>;A�::`:;�::;:';�:::;::::>:::>�::;::>::::::::<:::::::<:>:::<>::<:�::::::
;<:::�.::<:::::..
..,. ....:.........:.......:.........:...................
::�:.::.:.,.�:.<...�.m
_��,�
.�>::
. ..-,
::t:::: :>�F::
:.:�:.:
:;::�
�`f. 'r:3`t
'�f%�: ::•'!'r'i:«��:2�:�i�':�':�•s:�::•.
.
..
�
:::�:
5:1....
rw
:�::�::�. :::}
::E::::
:::�:::::�:::::: `�
:��:::::::::�::::
_
:�:: :�.:�.....::.:::..::::.
::�:�_
: :::::::::.:::::::.:::::::::::.:..:..:.::.:�.:..:::::.:::.
:::�::;�::�::�::::.::. ::_�:::.:.. ..�......
. ..............:.�:.::...:.:::::.::::::::.:..:...:..
. .::.::.::::::::.::.:::.::.::.::.::.::.::.::.:::::::::::.:::::::::::::.
:...:::::.::.::::::..:::.:..�::::.::...::..::....:....:.::.
::::::::::::::::::::�:::::::::::�:::::::::::::::::::�::�:::::::::::::::�::::
:.:::::::..:...::.:.:::.:.�:::::.:.�::::::::::::::.:.:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:..�::::::::::..::.:..;.::::.:::.�:.�::::::::._::::::::.::
:.::::::::::::.:::::::::..:::.:::::::.�.�::::::::::::::::.:::.::::::::.::::::::::.::::::::.::::::.::::.�:::::::::.:.:::..
::::.
..�.. T::.:a ...,�..:���.�_::_... !
:E�::
.r.<,...
,
.�:•: - - - -
u'4'.: -
_:::j::
F.:.
:,��.
_ - i.i3i?:::i;::i�<:�:�i•`::•'•:::^�ri5�?�::ci.
■
�
��t'i% - - -
-' .r::
�x3:,;;:':'�;..
`:�:��::
-�i;�:
:?��::�.:'�:,i;:
�:r.::
,F:;:�i:4:•:
::<<':<:::>:`:i<:<`::<:::;:`::<::;:s::>:::,
<'e:.':;3:5`•'•:.•
?�.�.......
._���:;::
.�:';:?:i;?...
';;,,'�- -
■
.
:��.:::.�,-
:�;i - �
��.:::::.:::::::::::::::..::�::::�:::::::::: i
�::.,.....?........
..�.
::�:::� _
::�::::.::.::.:.::.:�.:
:�:�:::�:��:::�::���:�::�::::::�:���:.;::::::::::����������:�::::�:::��:���:::::�::::�:::.. p _ _
.:�.. _
F.:i�'':'t£��.`:�:•":?.' ;�3'�ri;:;:$:;::�i;�:•.`;:'.`;?:^:;i:;�;j::`.i
�r::?t•co->x::r:
F
■
•:1+�::.�
r
::�.�
::�:::::::
::�::
.�.•::•,
�:���:r::��::-:�::::���:���:��::.
_ �::�::::�:�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_::::::::::.:::::::.::
_ _ .
::��:::::::.:::;:::,::�:::::
■
._�L..::::::..:
..,
.�::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::.:::.::,;
■
_ r;;:::� � ��
.�:,:. __:::�}:��,, _
:: .:�.: ::;::: �.:c::,.
.,,. !
n�<: -
::�•••
_.:•l•
.:).�:
•.i'';:,w,.:�
+::i::: 1 r� 1 �;\
..�..........:`
:'i�i
..�... •:�i•.
}��'.
>:�F:
�•
::�<' _3::.
:.�. ;:��::>::::.;::»::•
-
:::�,;::�:::
:�>3<::
:»•::
..�::=
:::;�::
:�>;:
::�:�::: ��7
:`��':
_.._,,.. ;>>�:.::::
- - :�::�::
':��.
..>,�'.s>:::::;:?;;;:;;`�;;z:_:z
^��::
.�:;•:.:::•:•:::::.�::::
..Li'�:i�':
7
.Y:J".:.'7v:.>'�.�:•:. ■
' �i1�'�T'iXy+�F.��'.h v.
v f i�{::
..:.�i...::.'..�
•r::.:..
..;,.^,�-,,,,,�.
:::7•:::::::'
- -
f;Vi�:3:#�::':::iy::::;i;i
::\::;�::;�'��c`i''•.r::::.�.
.
';��-::�::_i;::;__.___._.
.
.
::�r:?:�,:��:;<�'�.�'�.i•:>�
::•i�•;.::...
:r�.;b::�i:S:::�r::t:;::�: ■
:�:.
::�,: T.
.
I
?:�;� •.v:
�r`.v::::`:+:iii::'t�;:::i:
�
s es:
:53:>
1
;��cs
�'t�:�`.'';i:<::;5??;
::�3v
::3 i:i�
i i::
:�k;.,
�:H`:�t�:�::�;i;f:fi:::ii...
�i� -
,�:�i�.,.
- :t::i:ir:�:i'i;::;.'ct r
_7 't�:::.
_ ��
�}?iY.4:iii:�
...,�:...
i C�3 .�,�'.•'f.'`•�i'+:�i:t�::'r:�i?.`
s,3:.`;�.._..
.,_l. i
- :..�.__
:•...�-:.-:.:,..�:.:
1
�
_ .F.y:{:
';:i� ,�.::�s:;�.
i•.�........
�,
�
�
�
( �
- �
•`::��� �
;i�,;::!,;:;:,;:�.;x f
.1 .f:1:G_ a�; �I
•6>:
.•a..
�>
j�R:y} '
.}`k>:•
:`•:t::
+4}:
::'�:i:
?{:t
:.�. :;:��i
:�E�: :�a:�::
:s:��; :E:%`;
..'�`.�:::��
;�i��:
<E.
r'4�:;`
_ 2::�'3•',:::s_::i��i:• .:���:.'t�.�.T`'mm��':^�����:'r-.-i,..;.;.;.
q� �'f5i:•....
2t�c': -
�i'r••`•�::�:�s:• if�::::�'tf•,'•s�;:f�:f:::"::::i.`•:�f::ii:>;i:y:y:r
:::.:� •:.:�::::::: .:;
:i}';.
'4�0 •�^ - -
t.:':�:;:�,;:ii'+?;':;::;i;i;;:;;<�;i��;'d�:;:••:
�:��i�i� -
- 1, :E%�i ::t5:
- 'i�iEti;'.;"'.":::::�i::i�`..';;?r'
- ;•:�:�:��::'•;:..r:i�::;:;�.::.:.;,.:
': ..:?,<:i;�::�i�i3'9%':i::i�':�''o-:�• • • �:;:���.�,�'...��.�..
�::%�i�rii:�::�:.�••;::»:t•::.;S.;�•:-:�:::.;'.:.�`::c"�.;.-.-�.,...f•:::��::.�:;:-�:;i;::::_...:t::.'•:::�:'�;:::y;:�::;�::;�rr?
:�>. ss�:•. ..w. .,i,:; ::�:;: ",,,
„
,
';';;>�:%'+%.::::i::�:::�i:;::::::�::`•:::`:
.�
.t�:: ;;:j.:; „I
:>�----•-•--•na
:��
:::;�:? .r.�,.. �:"�;J�� -
..'^��: -
5�$ ' - '
�
:;:�f:: :�3E� :E�:`::�>;�
..�i:�''?�::;;.;.;;:;;S�i;"';;:n;i.?.::�`;Si
;i;f.;S
1
�
::'`:�;:y2.;.;:;}:jji:::t:
:.�•:.
I
��:�.;�
■ 3
�
':`•:i;::;?:::;?;�''•::::�:i�:�i>:i::?;:;i;�;;';••;:�
1 i
' �:•�4�r:•ii:::•:�}i:�:LCiii:ii;•:?:;?::::i;::?:
'' 's ryi'::....
' `• ��, .;.}r..r:. :ti:�:
" �::�:•1`:•'�:r r�.!'''.... ...�.......i........
11�,�:: :u��'? i:�•:: '�ii:•ii:�3:ii:Nii::4:i:i::I•i:4:•:?•:i:}{;:;:::�
_ _::.a�. _ ::�:::��;:::�..::.::.::..�::.:::.�:..:.:��,....
,...........::.:::.:�..::._.�:r.�:�� �0�
:.;:�::::..:.::::.�:::.:.:.....
�
�
�
:::�::
�;f::
� :� �:�.:
� �::
�
�
, :'.3''`
, -
,
::?�'�
:s�;:
:t::.
���� { {
,�:^
.'•�f> g �
;;�`: (
.::��::
� "c�
�;� :
••�(•`.•: .Yl..
•:1
i•�;�•
�f:
) ....n� S
f••
�"'r,+:
".f! F
-�: ic•
{d �Fi
�•'€n
r::•.• .��
.�
::'•i 4
�'S�
:�
r:;�r�'t;r;�y$}4+:;Y:,:::v;.�
•••'•3• €i.
::�'•
c,• t� .
;�'t•
N�
::9 i ,7• -t.�. .
■
f
S�i�� :j
�r .
_ >�
::�:3�
.1••:. �::::�'
::�.. �.s�.,.
�
� _ '
- �W�_.
����,
. ' _ _
-' -
„ - ' " -
,
,
- ' �=
.
'
-C::i
_ •.`•:`•f,r
_
j�:
�'�:'f,�e:.`�r•`'�'»��.'•i�:t2?�'':�:v;:�:':;�i::�.;:'�:�::"':::i�:�:1<:;'i�f<�<;:i�:�'
�•4+n .
-
..? .7 fi}'.:ii::v::i:::ii}:i:+vii:i:-:::•::::4::}in-
........................... .
•{•:::CiJ:•i:i::4Y•:::�ti%:i::•i:4:::Lti^'•::i:i
-��?ti{.$$:•:•:�fr?.'?���i::4::;i<lrii:•��:•ii:•?f•i::!i4}:?'ii::i" ....................................
••:tif'}`i:$ti�•:{$ti;i:•ii:i�ti?•:ti�:i:j.t?,St';i�. `d C::}.?.i:ti.}j:•:}{L�ii:;}}:•i:•:::;:;::i•:j?;F::};i:�{..
%$$:� i: �:1�� :: }:i1'v::iv::hr.ii'�4i}}:<ivii�>riiri:
11 �r:� - ���:..�4��.� :, t.
1 __ ��.
1 ._��..
11
1 ���:
1 �:<:;::::;::;::::.::.:.::;:::.::.;:.:;:.:.
� -
r;��� _ _ _
- �:�f�:
:���:;:;;?„+!'s
t; _
:�t'`iv�:':':'::�:'i�
:dG:�:-:"�'`.�:::>'-::�::=�:::�-�=:>__<:
.3.g;_,...,
.x:2;:::;;�,;:'f;�:•:::.�:::.�:::::•..,�_.��:.W;..�.
_::�
:�:�f:::�::�:'<�::.`,•':•.:;�:i�;t4,::•i:•::•:t�>::::•::;•i::•::+:•:::::ax�'� -
-:.C.,;�- _
vfiu:ar:6r::•::•�:•::a>::r:•is:;a::�
��d:�':i:•k?ti;ii:;{::,:;:5::�:i�.
..F....................r
�:t�:•
4...... -
_i:
Ti1
��.;:.
i.f$$i:{::?�'��:�:':i? :.:r
:::•��:;:<�;'�`��::�.
�r�;•::•: :;�:�:�:ii:t�:a::.:
:•'•.:�...::ta E�?:�....
,<i:{.::t�:�:•�.e.: .:�i:::4i:�{4:i'ri�.
::,c��.... .. Y �
::;:�r<:'•:. .�. .. :r � :.a; r:
f<ik:::�`:'•,••::: .�.��� .s .
�IIIIII .E.: ..� c .;:
11 � ��
� ,.�;:
�:: G
} .y_
��.
':h:�: � •:E:x:ti�:•<.L.4:•.::i,
�.c
� �:'::::"�����`�::
Y..�,,.::
u�;•:�:•;•;..
:E>: :•;r`�='s_'s' ` - - -
::��:���:_.4.�
:�a��.y3 ��:>..':�:`�
��.� ., "�
:'r•'
r:.�..:.. -
'�'�.
�.
�3
�: .5
?E::�: :::1:•..
....+!•.'.�•.
..rr:;'t:or r
r�
..�
.;.� J
./� �•: .��::�;"":,;.::�;:..T.�:��:,.;
..<<
��� .�:•:• •.k>:::•>::•::::.
.���•
:•.a-�e�:<::t:::.:::::::�<3::
:r;•
::� 3
=::%tr+,
..�.
..���.;�.�.
3''ri:t.. :.�:.•. �•�::.:r::•>:r>:�:::G:a:::
.��;::::;:m'';>::•..
......... ..:..
•;ti:•:.�:
-
;o:�•:: : y.::•�:::::n ,
;:I�:.::�::�<:•::,:•::•»>:�
.:::::::::. .>::.;:
.�.��_..... �.:�:�,� ::::�::�:
..�:
._l•.�...f..�:'{.;'�%;'....�.
p:s�:{:?:';;:r
::a:<�ss:�:�:�:�•:.�
_�:.c:�:.-
:i�'::•:i:�:r:io-;::�?;;:;...>;:•::•:::•>::<•>:••• '•S:��f:�`:^.
�_ �,;.,'.•.';:;::?:t�;:;:,�
�.::':;:;j:;�i;:ff::�5:.'•.
•F 2�::
-
:�.::'�^^•:,�;•:�...�-�=i::..:----::l.............'''�^*�
... .
. '••'•'�%%::•:.'%:%xi.:^-�^cc•:�:•;i::::i:<;':•`.;�:<•,'•.�;ii;;:,'^:�:t;t;::_:;?;:::'i�``:`•''�`':'.
�-�.�..,
,,. �.- - --
� � I �. � � � � � � � � i � � �,
• � • ' � �- • � =:'t:.
• . ., ,. ,..� .•.� i I I `�
• .�. -� �
�� �� -
,
r..
�' � � {�' � `j7 (;'
� �� S
Annexation lZeview Form �';�=��' ;
� � ,�aN -
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexa ion etition 5 2006 I��
i
TO : Building Surface ater Uti1�t�Y°�RFrar��r�
�� r �....
�i:r Water Uti i y — " ,'`'--"`;F`,`T _
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Astor Park�4nnexation, A-05-008
Location : The proposed 16.58-acre irregularly shaped Lindberg Annexation is
located south of south of Sunset Boulevard NE (SR 900)west of
148th Avenue SE. It only abuts the existing City boundary along its
northeast corner. The City will likely request that the Boundary
Review Board include the area to the north, across Sunset Blvd. NE
and south of the recently annexed Stoneridge Annexation to the
north, in order to avoid creating an unincorporated island. This
would also result in a more logical service area.
Date Circulated: Januarv 5, 2006 Comments Due: Januarv 12, 2006�
General Information
Area : 16.58 acres
Street length : 1,240 feet (existing)
Assessed Value : $1,977,500
Estimated Population : 49 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units and 28 trailor/manufactured
homes
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density �
Future Uses: : �d Dwelling Units ��
Future Po ulation • eo le
Reviewing Department/Division: j� � e e� ��`Q c-t
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
�0
/. /
�Odl�� S Y��� %D�i''!O� `g `�G��b �� /,QjDY�!'I4 . (over)
� �� � �
,
: ,
Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2
O1/OS/2006
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
�b
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division? ��S
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a.result of this annexation?
6U��
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation? ,� / �
/(J
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City
services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
�/V �
General recommendation and com ents:
�
,
� Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2
O1/OS/2006
,�,--
�;:
signature� � �ate: � G �
, .
ClTY OF REfVTON
DEC232005
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMEl�TCE RECEIVED
ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 a:a�J��`-�
(Direct Petition Method)
(10%PETITION—ASTOR PARKAN1i�EXATlON)
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF SUBMITTED BY: �,��,�-�Cc�� )
� �6 c
THE CIT�' OF RENTON ADDRESS: I lG 2 s ��l��Uc 5�
City Hall, c/o City Clerk ���,{,�„� ; �A ���c�
1055 South Grady Way PHONE: 2p�. ?;� ���-��_
Renton, WA 98055
The undersigned are qualified electors resident in the proposed annexation area who
represent not less than ten percent (10%) of the votes cast in the last general election and
who desire to annex to the City of Renton.
We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence
annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.020, of all or any part of the area
described below.
The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to
the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of
this petition.
The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request
for a public meeting with the undersigned. .
1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept, reject or
geographically modify the proposed annexation;
2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a
proposed zoning regulation;
3. 'The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of a proportional
share of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed; and
4. The City Council will decide whether to adopt a resolution
This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the
signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one
Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which
cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention.
Peck Annexation Petition Page 1 of 2
� �,
Astor Park Annexation ,
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she
is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualifted to sign, or who makes
herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read.the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names of petitioners should be iH identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the
real estate.) �
�*�'`#'�`��v���,�j�"''� ����.';;�* s`��:,'w'���'c�th,�� �,�'"`'y� `�'�'��' `° �3r��" y�'�r s"�4� #�"�f��,�,;� BL*��� ,� � .S Z"'�, :�,i�,�,"a;�r �� ,� � r,.
�� �+� d�&`r� ��������,�"�. �� =;a<'"���'�' �;���`�;�� �,;,�� �{'�`�w'���s�'"","�a,�'�'�*���°� � ��„fi�� €�s�����Xaa�z:�:(3���L'�'�,����'�,��1'0��1��`''��r���,�-�
�� T�,.`x�a.�,�"�'t�'2 s�.. �-._ .��T������'_"CZ���a`"�Z�°�L,,.. r rk ���F'�'a � ,f�a���;��%#�s`-.� �.r .x _ v�.� *r h ��� a�� w
�- ���st� .. .�t"1 s:a'*� ''�'v` N' y7s�^ �. } -;� �r,
w��' � s�r��y-.� ta�� E,�..� w � r.�3'd""`l?> .� �y l p �ii ti,a"` ,y, 'Y^t nt'y y �s�3.� y�p�..
�,....�F'§`y:T� �'� F-��k.:M'�t �.5 S�i Ma:�'-'.-*,">j ��.{k�,^.s✓z^�"�yF� �'�*,�fxrd�#�� e�1S"�s�G41�FTl�j A��\iSSk,.'�'���'.^'�+'�x q�{ �*'��25��'Y��+��.�rds�° }'�}��i.�i�S ��`���1�\f,.
� a .�'"�^r� �. �����rn.Pir,Qd�.t,��u, `i�.��':.F `� � v= '��-f�, -.�.; xrr��`n���` �,.�a`^... A'��.�-z � �� L �- s*�.� n::y��'"' '�.��'L'xb �
,'�;:,.'Y '� �Y y�'.�E*sa=. �ata �,.-,, �"`"�.� � � a.4 �'".r,�f�,r-:�" z...,�., �1 �� ::k� �s .�a�,�-�y �3 a„�`3 � r �t+1_.,. -�.»
y�.5� �. �� -� :�.� '��, * �«����„�5 � � � �o � er of�o � ��� � ���c� �on���> a�� �¢
� � ���-� � � �, y� z s ��K, �-���s,�;���?� �� �. �.� <. �����..��r �Tt ; � � �ine�a�io �
����gH�� '� -`t` �a' s*'��# �������`��.�'�'`�" �,t�-�3, F.`�d , x.�, €tY,3 �>'�rn �rt�` � �iee°�.,.. i <M ,�s..� ,E f . � ,�`,� �, y`'
i d'.� � �`�f'�..�`, s� .f+'^` ea�'rr�-�a��"�ar +os,M,,�. 1,�ro �- r= .�,$"'t�`"��t.r.ds.� b,�'q�r `i {>z.� �'^� 3'�'x � x 3 � �
�.� �s '�` �.�J s u� s�, `�����������'���°��.�"�^ � c'����`"� .. sf��'�`5� .������i� �YS�r� �.s..��i Y`�.� ,,,�-
E�� 'r'k�` �' ,,.z: 'l a ,�a��' ,�...�` a f '�3 f,�a.' `� �
��5•s�,� �"�"�``" �kt � y ���� $�4eaa� �v,•, r �,�^r+' 3'akdg'a�✓.: `F �`� �'�`� '`�,3`�" ga �: � z �`�''`d�, �,a�i�,i .,j'�'�y��,�r �
�i�,^. x. :�z'9°�'�Ha�'���. � 's i� rt. 1 Y �i � �
�ra��- �..�a.. �,� .�, �,� ��x�.-�� �..��.<���� .o�'� ,�. _.�4U1eY 4�-1.�� 3�;� �.�"r�����;�
�� (la2s 1�[� q-v� �� �� 2��.— ���,G�D
1. /� f?,��iv.,� c,��
L�,���Ll�� �vlCdC lG�`7 qD���
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
�.
9.
10.
Page 2 of 2
H:\DIVISION.S\P&TSIPLANNING�ANNEX110%Notice of Intent(rev's).doc\DE
12/12J05
a
�
Exhibit 1:
Proposed Annexation Lots
Exhibit 2:
Legal Description of Proposed Annexation Lots
Exhibit 3:
Aster Park Covenant Agreement—signed 2004. I have contacted John Norris
several times over the last two weeks and spoken with him about the Aster Park
Annexation Petition. He has been informed of his legal requirement to sign the
petition(per section 1 and 3 of the covenant)but has yet to sign the petition. John
Norris had asked several questions of Don Erickson which I delivered to John
Norris via fax.
Exhibit 4:
King County Assessors Land Value Assessment for 2005 —July 31St new
Assessment will be released for 361ots in Aster Park. Average home price of
$SOOK. Over 60% are currently sold.
_ ... _._�
���11:�?�lt �
A.�t�r P�.rl� �.nn���.t��a�. -- �O��o T�'i��l�l(�Il
�.�- .
. � � .
. ����C� :
��z ��� �gz�
` 03�����a��' t��� �.�1 �e.�
. .1�,-�' .. 5:�1 a
����(� a3Z305 �Z�f
. -.�;�.
- - � p�Z '�6'.� `$Z�f3
` �-�$ GJ.(1�c -4-3 z"1 2'4�- D.�k a-�,
. . ' 1
t
v � �_ N� = ����' ��
�D � �`? '�'�' �.�. ��.�2..� ��
� �
��, � �v�� � � �3,� �t3
,
��,.�,,. ���.�?;���� �� ;_ � � �c� . (� � ��� ��
, �� ��
�
�������� � �� � -
-���� � � `�� -
A _ .
' Rentonnet Plat Index Search E��1�lt � �
.
. _. � :�¢ . .
�• � '� � �, � � � ,
Legal Descriptian -�ccount Number: �323059020
LOT 2 KCSP 877123 REC AF#7809060875 SD PLAT DAF S 330
FT OF E 660 FT OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LESS C/M RGTS LESS CO
RD
� •��,u ,�.,,
�.
httn://rentonnet.or�/internetanns/K(''A/inrlex cfm9fi�ePar.tinn=chnwlPoal,�R=1 ��i��i�nns
Rentonnet Plat Index Search Page 1 of 1 �`
� �
= ; Y
� � _ _ . �� -�w_� .R ..m_ .
r L4�Yy �P.p ���:,f o, �v;yt
.iv� R�,a ^,.,i � �,
LegaE L7escription -Acco�ar�fi Number: 0323059026
BEG 330 FT N OF SE GOR OF SEC TH W 660 FT TH N TO
STATE RD#2 TH NELY ALG HWY TO SEC LN TH S TO BEG
LESS CO RD LESS C/M RGTS
'�� � ��� �� _ ', ,�, ,,. �'
http://rentonnet.org/internetapps/KCA/index.cfin?fuseaction=showlegal&R=1 12/12/2005
f
Rentonnet Plat Index Search Page 1 of 1
� ' � �, ..�x . . , '
� � .. .�. � . � .. _�, ._ _ ,
� � ��'�' ���if!��� �� �, �' ,
� � • •,.
Legal D�scription -Account Number: U323059028
W 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LY SLY OF SUNSET HWY LESS C/M
RGTS
? -:�'� � �x�� �'`:�. i
http://rentonnet.org/internetapps/KCA/index.cfin?fuseaction=showlegal&R=1 12/12/2005
Rentonnet Plat Index Search Page 1 of 1 '`
. � � `� `� . . ..
_ __ �� � _ �
� � � �� �' �� �iL9d if� 'I�{ �� �� "'i �
Legal Description -Account Number: 0323059250
LOT 1.KC SP 877123 REC AF#7809060875 SD PLAT DAF S 330
FT OF E 660 FT OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LESS C/M RGTS LESS CO
RD
°" � �� �°�';
a; �..4�..=......,....�,...A.,.
http://rentonnet.orglinternetapps/KCA/index.cfin?fuseaction=showlegal&R=1 12/12/2005
r
Rentonnet Plat Index Search Page 1 of 1
= � �
a ��
� d n��:
�.. _._ N.,:, �._Q.r ���.�... ...._ _�+,.,... _ _
`., a � �,. �
e. � , . u , . , ;,� , • ;
Legai Description -Account Numb�r: 0323059251
LOT 3 KCSP 877123 REC AF#7809060875 SD PLAT DAF S 330
FT OF E 660 FT OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LESS C/M RGTS LESS CO
RD
4.��'� `���+.. ^�`-�� .�.��
��
httn�//rentonnet_�r�/internetanns/KCA/index_cfm?fu�eaction=showle�al&R=1 12/12/2005
Exhibit 3
�' _ . �}ave,. �.. .
Return Address:
Gitv Cterk"s Office
City of Rentan �� ;� , '�� � y ` � �� � <
IQ55 Sauth Grady Wati c���� RENTON Cov 24.e0 `�
PACiEO@ 1 OF @88
Renton. WA 9$055 Kz�C240�e�Yes.��s�
DECLARATION OF COVEIYANT AND Pro,;rertv Tax Parce!Number:
! ANNEXATION AGREEMENT O'�2��`1'DZ6 `��3 Z,3D����`�
NEW'DEVELOPMENT Sttett inters�ctior:;�r Proae�t l�amz:
Gra$�or(s): Graatee(s): - _
t. Na,�,�is NDM�, ��, ft ��l• �1°°''�''O"- !_ Cit��af Rentan.a Municipa!Corporation
The Agreement zxecuted herein between[he Cit� of ftentan. Vb'ashineton.a muniripai corporation.hereinafter reterred to a� �
"CtTY-'and the C:rantor{s),��named ahcive andlar succ:zssors in interest of certain prt�pem,hereinat'ter retzrred tc�as
"C�WNER".is fc�r and in consideration of 4he furnishine of utilin �tn ic�h��the C'!TY tu certain prapem of the(?WTlER
hereinafter referred to a.:"PROPERTI"'. The OWNER does hereb� petition for annexation of the PROPERTY ta the C'ITY_
does hereb��agree to the conditions of anne�ation herein.and doe�hereb• dzclare this co��enant.
l. .�CKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND REPFtESENTATION�
The Grantor does hereb� acknowledge and agree as faUc��a�:
i.i. The t�Wt�JER is the owner of certain PROPERT�'.titi�hich is{ocated outside the corpcnate limits of the
CIT�-. ,i
1.�. The(�WNER is:�kine Preliminan Plat appro�a)t�om i�ine C"ounn ti�r the PR4PERT1�. �
I.:. The()WNER h��raquesced the CITY ro furni�h���rr:er�ic�to the PROPERTI�. �
l.-i. This A�reement to txtend sewer service outside tht cnrporatt timits of thr CITY' ic auth�rized h� RC�
T5.67.;11!and RCVa'?�.9?.!?0 and sha!!not k�e cc�nstrued a�a�c�luntar� a�reement pursuant to RCV�'8?.(??_02U
and therefore the pmvisic�ns of RCW 82.fl2.020 shail ncx he applied her�to.
i.�. This Agreement doe�not preciude am e�aluation and detzrminatian b� c6e CiTl�'that later develapment
actions or proposak undertaken h� che OWNER ma.�require a de�ermination ofsieniticancr and envir�nmental
revie�+ under SEP.a.
I.6. Per Renton Municipal C'ode Section-1-6-U4U.the i7�a�ntr uf propert� in R�nton':Potential.annexation
.�rea sha!!exeeute a commitmenc to future annexation and compliance w ith certain other conditions a.�a
prerequisite for the extension of crr c:onnection to the C'it1'•::anitan �ewer«stetn autside of che Cit� �imits.
1.,. �C'ITl"'S requiremeni c�f an annzxation agrezmznt or a commitment tc}future anne�ation a>a condition
of extendine udiit� >ervict outside th�corporate limit�of the CiTl� i�rec:oenized b� 1�ashineton iatt.
I.R. The PROPERTY is located within the C"ITl'�� P(.�TE?vTIAL �NNEXATIOTv.�REA or I�RBA?v
SERVICE .AREA for annexation purposes as adopezd h� the C'lTl in i�s C�omprehensi��Plan pursuant to the I�ing
C'ounn Counnwide Planning Palicie:.
- I
�
�.�7c� — DO'1?j �
e.
, ' . .
D.ECLttRATION CDF�4.VENA�tT AND Prap�rtv Tax �arce!Na�eober:
ANIYEXA'i'ION AGREE!!'IENT 03,23D 1,� '� Q.�Z3OS```�1Z$`j
NEW DEVELOPMENT Sirezt Intersection or PmizcC Name: �S� ���
19. !t is the in�eresr nfif�e citi=ens qJ/h�t,JT) �n i�tsrrre�htu n!l F�uhlrc improremenr.�tJra�are nr c�ould he
e•ons�ruc�ed u•irlrirr ihe�rnrpara�e limr�.c nJ the ClT) or�rill h�uhima�elr unne.�-ecl in�n�he(�7T) urr conslrta•�ec1 in
uccordance�+•irh(`lT I ronsrruc�ion siundard,c
1.I1►. The OWNER'ti request for the ex[ensian of utilit. stnice��+a.dul� considered b� the CITI'.and it��as
determined that the furnishing of seu�er servic�to the PRC?PERTI�t;ould bz proper upon the tulti!ling c�f a!!
ccmditipns herein.
I
i.1 I. The(JVWN£i2 dnes hereb� acknaa�ledge that in the e�ent ot'�iolation or hreech of the terms ot thi� �
PETiTON_.�GREEMFNT'AND C'OVEN.ANT.or upon th�in�aiidation ot this PETITOI�..�GREEMENT.aND �
' C�OVENANT h� iudicial action.operation of IaN or athen��ise.the C'IT}'reszr�t�the ri�ht at its:olz diserttion ro �
immediatel� terminate the provisian�futilit� .erv'ice to the PRUPERTI�and in such ca�;e the(�WNER agrees to
indemnin�and hold the C'lTl��harmless trom an�and all claicnc�e2'an+ �art�.
'. PROPERTY DESCRIPTIOt�
The PROPERTI�i.hereb. described a,.fotiaiM•: I
The PRCIPERTI� i�leeali� described in.Attachment.�.attachtd herero and incorporated b� reference as if szt fonh
in full. The O.WNER�tiarrants that.Attachmenr.�1 rs correct as fulh describine suhi��t PROPERTI�
�. PE71Ti0I�i AND C'UV�N:4NT FOR�NNEXATl01`
The C)WNElt_ in consideratit�n ofthe(:1T1'�ti aereemenc tc�pro�icie utilit� :zrvict tc�the PRC?PERTI'_doe.heceh�
petiti�n.agree and cn�znant as follnt{�: (
r
�.I The C)wNER do�•hereb��aeree.promis�and co�-enant that if at am time the PF20PEi2T1� i�incl��ded
�vithin am area���hich i;:being c�nsidered for annz?�ation to the C'1Tl'.:aid OWTIER dozs join in>aid anne�ati�7n.
3.� The C)WNER agrees to execuce all necessan docum�nts�uch a�letters.notices.pztitians or other
insttuments initiating.furthering or accamplishin€the annexatiQn of the PRC?PEJ2T1`to rhe CITY'.�vhether or not
the annexation in�alves the�tsumption bt the area to be annexed of e�isting CITY� indebtedness.the applicacian�o
the area to be anneked of tt�e C'lTl�Comprehensi�t P(an and land use controi�.and�uch o�hzr canditions as ch�
(:(TY'ma� lawtaltt impo�r. The{)W1�1£R.for him�her%thems�ltizs and tor hisrhzr�their heir:.:ucces:.or:�and �
a.ssigns_aeree>and co�enant�with the C'il'lr'.and to thz present and future u�+�ner;.of the PRC7PERTY ti7�4hich
this covenant relates.thar such agreement is�o consticute a eovznant runnine�with thc land_that he�she�the� >hall.
when�ver se�requested.zxecute such letters,noticea,petitians c�r nther instrument::. (7WlT1ER understands that the
ClTY��•ill record thi�dpcument and the�WTlER agree�tu�peciYica!!� ad4is�future interests in the propem.
covnt annex neti devel?004�f�5�?R/U4 Pa�e� FC�RM u_u00R/bh.
DECLARATIQN OF CUVENANT ANQ Properiv Tax Paree!Nn�ber:
AIYTVEXATION AGREEMEMT <�323vS"9p �f�3L.3t�S`�'ZS!
NEVV DEVELOPMENT 5treet Intersection ar Project Name:�j� ���
�.; The QWTIER recoenizes that the lau�of the State af Washingt�n relatine tc�the annexation ot propert1
b� a cin pro�ides that properrti ma•�be anne!:ed ta a cin ifpropem o�+�nerc:ien a petition far such an annexatian.
The OW?�lE(t recagnized and agrees that b� sienine thi..�ereement.tht PROPERTIr�of the OWNER v.ill'
automaticall� be included as a propem ca be annexed in the e��ent PROPERTY is within a proposed annexatian .
area. The ON"'�'ER.ti�r�lzer recogni�es�hat there are ot/r�r nrethotl,r nt rrnx�xatinrr cr!/t�H�ed e�nder the(aw:c�r the
S7ate of�u asfaengtnrr. including tfre rlecrrn»met{rtrd.
:.�i The 01'�NER understands that the C)W1VER'ti�ignatures on this.�gr�ment i.an admissicrn that tht
OWNER understands the cenain right�c��hich the{.)WNER has reeardine the PROPERTI��and that the(:)WNER i�
«�iiiingi� waivine,uch rights in consideration of recei��ing the described utilit� .en-iczs.
�.� The undersigned OWNER ofthe PROPERTI'.on behalfoti himselt%herselt7themselces.hisrher�their
heirs.sueces�ors and as�igns.hereb��designate(s!the ClTI'ac OWNER'S true and lawful attomet-in-fact for the
purpose o!cigning an. pecition leading to the annexazion of said PRCtPEKT1'co the C'tTY�.�a�ittr tu11 pou�er to do
and perEerrm am propec act�which the�WNEit mati dc�~ti�ith respect to the anne�atian o#"said reai propert�. The
CtTY ma� exercise this potiker through its C'it� Cltr�or othznti�ist a.the C'iTti'C'Ol'NC1L ma� direct. '1"hi�
Special Pow�r of Attorne� i�Qiven for the ealuable consideration of the furnishine oY'seti�er ser��ict h� the C`ITl'_
and this Special Pow•er of Attorne� is further eiven a:securit. for}�ert+ormance of the annexarion ci�venant .
obligation set f�rth herein. This Special Po�k�er af.Attorne� i�nc�t re�ocable and shall nt�t he atTected h1 the
di$abilin of the pFincipal_ •
�
�1. �GREEtvfElvT ANCt CU�ENENT t3�'CONDtTIUNS:#ND MITIGATtUN MEASURES
The O�TtER acknowiedges that the C(TY has a desirc«�havz�ertain minimum development�tandard�rr�t for �
ne�+�developments in the CITY's Patential.Annexation Area. 7'he(.)WNER.in considerauon of the CITY��
agreement to provide sanitar� sewer utilit� ser�icz ro thz PROPERTY and in recagnition c�t�the CITl"s conditions
, tbr annexation«fthe PRCIPERTY:does hereb� agree and a��enant tc�pro�ide the�r de�elapment ptans co the
CITY tbr their intt�rmation. E�cept as ma� be ivai��ed t+� the CiTY'.Pubiir 1J�%orks:�dministrator or hssrher
designee.the minimum design siandards that�+�iil hz required are:
-1.1 '�fie OWNER shail provide record drawines of all ot the constructed Public Work":tacilities for tht
C"iTY-s records.
�ovnt annex neH devel?Of�4-Reviced M.IR 6-I-U4U16/Olifi4 Past.= FpRM f1:lipORfhh:
DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property Tax Parcel Number:
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT U3Z30S"`�DZ�o `�� 63Z3�,S'���
NEVv DEVELOPMENT Street Intersection or Pmject�Iame: A��� P�r�
/TJ
�. GENERAL PROVISIONS
The OWNER and the C�ITY do hereb� ackno���ledet and agree to the tollo��ing protiisions_��hich apph to the
entire.42reement herein.
�.l The OWTIER agrees that all future land u>r and de�elopmeni c�n the PROPERTI��sill mett all land usr
and development standards of the CITt�. In the r�ent of a contlict between CITI'�tandards and am applicable �
C�ount���tandards.the more re�tricti�r standard�as detern�ined b� thz C�ITI'shall appl�. i
�.� tio modification<ofthis.�greement shall bc made unlr�>mutualh agretd upon b� the partiz�in �+riting. �
�.� tiothing in this aereement shall be construzd io rreate an� tinanrial ohlieation un tht pan of'the CITI� �
� � �
i �+�ith reeard to annexation_construction of utilitie�and appurtenancz�_or am other matter. The(:)W?vER and thr
CITY hereb� acknowledeed that it ic the OwNER'�responcibilit� io tinanct the desien and construction af utili[�
facilities needed t�servt OWNER-s propem consistent���ith tht C'ITti'plam and specitications. unles>othen��i.r
agreed b� the CITI .
�.� The tertns and provisions ofthic PETfT1C>T`. .�GREEMEN�f AND COVEN.4NT:hall insure to thz
benetit and became bindine upon the heirs.�ssiens andlor successor�in interest of the parties hereto. Thr
OWNER a2rzes to indemnir�and hold the CITY harmlesc fmm am claims am suhsequent purchaszr ma� ha�z as ,
a result of this Agreement. includin2 CITY'S attorne� tees and cos[>.
�.� .am notict or demand required or permitted to he siven under this.4greement shall t�sufticient if si�en
in�a�ritine and sent b� reeistered or certitied mail.return reczipt requested.u�thr addres:of the partie��tt forth
belo�+. .�m notict.hall�ie deemed to have heen gi�en on the datr it is deposited in tht l .ti. Posta� Ser�icz mail
�a�ith postage prepaid.
�.6 If for am re�eon ofam default or breach on the part of either thr OW?JER or thz CITI� in the
pertormance ofam of the pm�ision of this Agreement a legal action is ins[i[uted.tht pam not preeailine aeree.to
pa� all rea.eonable costs and attome� tees and costs in ronnection therewith. It i>hereb� aereed that the.rnue uf
an� legal action brought under the tertns of thic.4greement shall be I�ing C'ount�. washington. This Agreemem
shall be governed b> the applicable laws. rules_and regu)ation�of the titate i�f W�shineton and the C'ITl.
�.� ln the��-��u that am ttrm.pro.•i>ion,conditiun_clau�t i�r uthtr portion ufthi�AereCmenl he heid to bc
inoperative_ imalid. �oid.ur in contlict�+ith applicable pro�i:ion.rondition_rlause or other portion of this I
.�ereement.and the remainder of this Aereement shal l bz ttfiecti�z ac if�uch rerm. provision.condition or other
portion had not heen con[ained herein.and to this znd.thz tzrms of thi:.�greement are declared b� thz parties ro bz
severable.
�.R lipon rxecution.the CITYµill record the�e rovenant���ith thc l�ine C�ount. Recorder��Otticz.
�ovnt annex neu devel?pU4Ui>/�R/l� Pa�r�i Fi7RM u;uI�OR/bh-
DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property Tax Parcel Number_ �
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT �OjL��lD2�o �' a3 z3�Y9�sl
NE1�v DEVELfJPMENT �trtzt Intersection or Prc�i��t?vame: �1�.�,f� P�f� �
E !1
IN WlTN�SS WHEREOF. !hatie he�eunto�t m� hand and saal thz da. and�ear a���ritten beto«.
` _!___�•� I
� rantor Stgnaturei�l /NDIV/DU.dL FORMOF.4Ck"NOWLEpGMENT �
?votan Seat must bz+tiithin bot tiT.�TE<)F Vb�.A5hiiNC;TC)?� �S$ i
t'C)t'�7T1�{)F F:Iidt� �
t certiti that (knoi} c}c hati z>atistacton eti idzncz that
sianed this instrument and
ac[�nawledged it tc�t�e his1herjt6eir free and�aluntan act for ihz nses and putpose�
inentioned in the instrctmeni. �
�
� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington �
�
Natarv{Print) �
Mv appointment exp�res�
Dated:
DECLA.RATION OF COVENANT Al�1D Propert�Tax Parcel Number:
AIYNEXATION AGREEMENT � Q3 3�. qa�6 �03�30�9��1
Projeet Fite k: ';treet Inters,zction or Prc�i�cr lvame: �l.�� P�q�
tN WITN� SS WHER�OF. 1 ha�ai:hereur�to set mv hand and seal the dav and vear as written below.
� �:�'t.:.r� ��'a � (
�
I
CORP4RATE FORM OF.4CK/vOWL�E'DGMENT �
f 'vatart Seal ma�t t�e�aithin tx}x tiTATE C)F W.�SHINGTt�?� ti r�s (
i'f.)L�tVTY F 1tit1vC; � �,(
� ```��,�1�11l1l��t� C)n thi��da� ot���,�.�--'1�.�- hefore me p�rsona(I� appeared �
� . +��;�D��'+►t,�ljj ta�mt I:noun«, (
t
I + ��.��'�` �iy� �/�be «f the cosporation that !
i � - ;Q„Y'�TA,�rj �"j4�� ��x�cuted the�aithin instrument.and ackno�vledge tht caid ins[rumen[co he rhe frez i
..� ��i� � �� �i� �nd iolnntar act and deed c�f.aid carporarion_tor the uses and purpoststherein ?
� � � � ' a� �en�ioned.and each un oath azared cha�hr:.he��ac authorized to exec:ute;aid �
� �" 6t1.�. �s: �nstrument and that the>eal atti�ed i�the rc�rpc�rate.�al c�t�said co�poration.
tiy���►�'�p;C►�,���'
Kw��`� ,�
�lttr������•►���~ Notary Pubiic in and for the State af Vvashington �
Natarv{Print i � !
c
I Mv appa�r rment expires: i
Dated: �
�ov�t annex neH devei 20fiq�i��/?R/it4 Pase� F(>RM���u0(1R/hh-
ATTACHMEN'i' `A'
ASTER PARK �EGAL D�SCRIPTION
That portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3. Township ?3
North. Range� East. Willamette Meridian. in King Count��. Washington. described as
follows:
Beginiung at the Southeast comer of said section 3:
Tt�ce North along the East line thereof 3�0 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of
the tract herein described:
T��ce.VVest parallel to Said South line oY Section 3 a distance 660 feet:
The�ce North to the Southerlv margin of State Elighwav No: ? "Sunset Highwa�-'�:
T�ce Northeasterlv along said highway to the East line of Section 3:
Thence South along the East line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING:
Except the East 30 feet thereof in 148`h Ave. SE.
T'i►get�er with:
Lot 3 as delineated on King County Short Plat number 8771?3. recorded under recording
number 7809060875. in King Countv_ Washington_ said short plat being a portion of the
South 330 feet of the East f 60 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 3. Township?3 North_ Range �.East. �Villamette Meridian. in King Count��.
Washington.
Exhibit 4
Parce1032305-9251 ASTER PARK
Parcel Data
Parcel 032305-9251 Present Use Vacant(Single-family)
Name ASTERPARK Zoning R4.
Site Address 11025 148TH AV SE 98059 Jurisdictiou KING COUNTY
Area Code 032-004 Property Type Code R
Block Lot
Legal Description LOT 3 KCSP 877123 REC AF# 7809060875 SD PLAT DAF S 330 F'I'OF E 660 FT OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LESS C/M
RGTS LESS CO RD
Land Data �
Land SqFt 142,441 Use Eaemption
Acres 3.27 Environmental No
Water WATER DISTRICT Topography No
Sewer/Septic (none) Traffc No
V1eWS
Rainier No Sound No
Olympics No Lk Wash No
Cascades No Lk Samm No
Territorial No LWRiv/Crk No
Seattle No Other No
Waterfront
Location No Footage 0
Bank No Access Rights No
Tide/Shore No Prox.Influence No
Restricted No Poor Quality No
Building/Improvement
Page 1 of 3
Parcel 032305-9251 ASTER PARK
Tax Roll History
Appraised Taxa6le
Tax Yr Omit TaxValue Land Val Imp Val Total Laad Val Imp Val Total
Yr Reason
2006 0 240,000 14,000 254,000 240,000 14,000 254,000
2005 0 232,000 14,000 246,000 232,000 14,000 246,000
2004 0 75,000 10,000 85,000 75,000 10,000 85,000
2003 0 75,000 10,000 85,000 75,000 10,000 85,OA0
2002 0 75,000 10,000 85,000 75,000 10,000 85,000
2001 0 75,000 10,000 85,000 75,000 10,000 85,000
2000 0 75,000 10,000 85,000 75,000 10,000 85,000
1999 0 40,000 10,600 50,600 40,000 10,600 50,600
1998 0 40,000 10,600 50,600
1997 0 40,000 10,600 50,600
1996 0 40,000 10,600 50,600
Sales History
E Number Sale Date Sale Price Instrument Sale Reason
1988896 9/17/2003 305,000 Statutory Warranty Deed None
Review �Iistory
Tax Yr Review# Review Type Appeal Val Hearing Dt Settlement Val Hearing Result Status
Permit History
Number Type Value Issue Date Jurisdiction Review Dt
Home Improvement E�emption
Exempt No Bldg No Date Rec Date Comp Beg Yr Est Cost
Page 2 of 3
Parce1032305-9251 ASTER PARK
Internet Resources
Summary Report for your area:
http://www.metrokc.gov/Assessor/AreaReports/2005/Residential/032.pdf
Visit Property Tax InfoRnation System to access your tax bill:
http://www.metrokc.gov/finance/treasury/kctaxinfo/
Visit Records O�ce's web site to view Excise Tax Affidavits:
http://146.129.54.93:8193/localization/menu.asp
Visit GIS Pazcel Viewer for the map of the pazcel:
http://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer?PIN�323059251
Glossary of Terms
http://www.metrokc.gov/Assessor/eRealProperty/GlossaryTecros.html
�
Page 3 of 3
Parce1032305-9026 ASTER PARK
Parcel Data
Parcel 032305-9026 Present Use Vacant(Single-family)
Name ASTER PARK Zoning R4
Site Address Jurisdiction KING COCJNTY
Area Code 032-004 . Property Type Code R
Block Lot
Legal Description BEG 330 FT N OF SE COR OF SEC TH W 660 FT 1T-I N TO STATE RD#2 TH NELY ALG HWY TO SEC LN TH S TO BEG
LESS CO RD LESS GM RGTS
Land Data
Land SqFt 253,260 Use Exemption
Acres 5.81 Environmental No
Water WATER DISTRICT Topography No
Sewer/Septic (none) Traffic No
Views
Rainier No Sound No
Olytnpics No Lk Was6 No
Cascades No Lk Samm No
Territorial No LWRiv/Crk No
Seattle No Other No
Waterfront
Location No Footage 0
Bank N.o Access Rights No
Tide/Shore No Prox.Influence No
Restricted No Poor Quality No
Building/Improvement
Page 1 of 3
Parce1032305-9026 ASTER PARK
Tax Roll History
Appraised Taxable
Tax Yr Omit TaxValue Land Val Imp Val Total Land Val Imp Val Total
Yr Reason
2006 0 344,000 0 344,000 344,000 0 344,000
2005 0 333,000 0 333,000 333,000 0 333,000
2004 0 205,000 0 205,000 205,000 0 205,000
. 2003 0 196,000 0 196,000 196,000 0 196,000
2002 0 185,000 0 185,000 185,000 0 185,000
2001 0 166,000 0 166,000 166,000 0 166,000
2000 0 160,000 0 160,000 160,000 0 160,000
1999 0 144,000 0 144,000 144,000 0 144,000
1998 0• 120,000 0 120,000
1997 0 120,000 0 120,000
1996 0 120,000 0 120,000
Sales History
E Number Sale Date Sale Price Instrument Sale Reason
1988895 9/8/2003 262,921 Statutory Warranty Deed None
Review History
Tax Yr Rev(ew# Review Type Appeal Val Hearing Dt Settlement Val Hearing Result Status
Permit History
Number Type Value Issue Date Jurisdiction Review Dt
Home Improvement Exemption
Exempt No Bldg No Date Rec Date Comp Beg Yr Est Cost
Page 2 of 3
Parce1032305-9026 ASTER PARK
Internet Resources
Summary Report for your area:
http://www.metrokc.gov/Assessor/AreaReports/2005/ResidentiaU032.pdf
Visit Property Tax Information System to access your tax bill:
http://www.metrokc.gov/finance/treasury/kctaxinfo/
Visit Records Of�ice's web site to view Excise Tax Affidavits:
http://146.129.54.93:8193/localization/menu.asp
Visit GIS Pazcel Viewer for the map of the parcel:
httpJ/www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer?PIN�323059026
Glossary of Terms
http://www.metrokc.gov/AssessodeRealProperty/GlossaryTerms.html
Page 3 of 3
Parce1032305-9250 BEZMAN ALEKSANDR+RENATA
Parcel Data
Parcel 032305-9250 Present Use Single Family(Res Use/Zone)
Name BEZMAN ALEKSANDR+RENATA Zoniug R4
Site Address I 1045 148TH AV SE 98059 Jurisdiction KING COLJNTY
Area Code 032-004 Property Type Code R
Block Lot
Legal Desceiption LOT 1 KC SP 877123 REC AF #7809060875 SD PLAT DAF S 330 FT OF E 660 FT OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LESS C/M
RGTS LESS CO RD
Land Data
Land SqFt 30,000 Use Exemption
Acres 0.69 Euvironmental No
Water WATER DISTRICT Topography No
Sewer/Septic PRIVATE Traftic No
�IeWS
Rainier No Souud No
Olympics No Lk Wash No
Cascades No Lk Samm No
Territorial No Lk/Riv/Crk No
Seattle No Other No
Waterfront
Location No Footage 0
Bank No Access Rflghts No
Tide/Shore No Prox.dnfluence No
Restricted No Poor Quality No
Building/Irriprovement
Building Nbr 1 of 1 Living Units 1
Yr Built/Renov 1962 Bedrooms 2
Grade 6 Low Average Total Baths 1
Condition Good Basement 0
AGLA 1,450 Fiuished Bsmt 0
Accessory Imps Y Covered Parking 0
Page 1 of 3
Parce1032305-9250 BEZMAN ALEKSANDR+RENATA
Tax Roll History
Appraised Taxable
Tax Omit TaxValue Laad Val Imp Val Total Land Val Imp Val Total
Yr Yr Reason
2006 0 129,000 125,000 254,000 129,000 125,000 254,000
2005 0 125,000 1I7,000 242,000 125,000 117,000 242,000
2004 0 82,000 115,000 197,000 82,000 115,000 197,000
2003 0 79,000 110,000 189,000 79,000 110,000 189,000
2002 0 75,000 90,000 165,-000 75,000 90,000 165,000
2001 0 67,000 84,000 151,000 67,000 84,000 151,000
2000 0 65,000 60,000 125,000 65,000 60,000 125,000
1999 0 65,000 48,000 113,000 65,000 48,000 113,000
1998 0 60,000 45,000 105,000
1997 0 60,000 41,800 101,800
1996 0 60,000 41,800 101,800
Sales History
E Number Sale Date Sale Price Instrument Sale Reason
2100601 2/2/2005 238,500 Statutory Wamanty Deed None
2027340 I/16/2004 Quit Claim Deed Divorce Settlement
Review History
Tax Yr Reviewtl Review Type Appeal Val Hearing Dt Settlement Val Aearing Result Status
Permit History
Number Type Value Issue Date Jurisdiction Review Dt
Home Improvement Exemption
Exempt No Bldg No Date Rec Date Comp Beg Yr Est Cost
Page 2 of 3
Parce1032305-9250 BEZMAN ALEKSANDR+RENATA •
Internet Resources
Summary Report for your area:
http://www.metrokc.gov/Assessor/AreaReports/2005/ResidentiaV032.pdf
Visit Property Tax Informarion System to access your tax bill:
http://www.metrokc.gov/financeltreasury/kctaxinfo!
Visit Records Office's web site to view Excise Tax Affidavits:
http://146.129.54.93:8193/localization/menu.asp
Visit GIS Parcel Viewer for the map of the parcel:
http://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer?PIN�323059250
Glossary of Terms
http://www.mehrokc.gov/Assessor/eRealProperty/GlossaryTerms.html
Page 3 of 3
Parce1032305-9028 HENDRICKSON LORAN B
Parcel Data
Parcel 032305-9028 Present Use Mobi(e Home Park
Name HENDRICKSON LORAN B Zoning R48
Site Address 14441 SLTNSET BL NE 98059 JurisdiMion KING COiJNTY
Geo Area 75-60 Property Type Code C
Block Lot
Leeal Description W 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LY SLY OF SLTNSET HWY LESS GM RGTS
Land Data
Land SqFt 261,360 Use Exemption
Acres 6.00 Environmental No
Water, WATER DISTRICT Topography No
Sewer/Septic PUBLIC Traffic No
V1CWS
Rainier No Sound No
Olympics No Lk Wash No
Cascades No Lk Samm No
Territorial No Lk/Riv/Crk No
Seattle No Other No
Waterfront
Loca6on No Footage 0
Bank No Access Rights No
TidelShore No Prox.In[luence No
Restricted No Poor Quality No
Building / Im�rovement
Gross Sq Ft 2,360 Net Sq 2,360 .
Building Nbr 1)UTILTl'Y BLDG Gross Sq Ft � 540
Year Built 1959 Net Sq Ft 540
Effective Yr 1959 Construction MASONRY
Page 1 of 3
Parcel 032305-9028 HENDRICKSON LORAN B
Building / Improvement
Building Nbr 2)SINGLE FAMILY RFS Gross Sq Ft 1,274
Year Built 1936 Net Sq Ft 1,274
Effective Yr 1936 Construction WOOD FRAME
Building Nbr 3)SINGLE FAMILY RFS Gross Sq Ft 546
Year Built 1942 Net Sq Ft 546
Etfective Yr 1942 Construction WOOD FRAME
Tax Roll History
Appraised Taxable
Tax Yr Omit TaxValue Land Val Imp Val Total Land Val Imp Val Total
Yr Reason
2006 0 720,000 167,500 687,500 720,000 167,500 887,500
2005 0 720,000 156,100 876,100 720,000 156,100 876,100
2004 0 653,400 195,500 848,900 653,400 195,500 848,900
2003 0 653,400 174,400 827,800 653,400 174,400 827,800
2002 0 653,400 174,400 827,800 653,400 174,400 827,800
2001 0 653,400 170,500 823,900 653,400 170,500 823,900
2000 0 392,000 120,000 512,000 392,000 120,000 512,000
1999 0 392,000 120,000 512,000 392,000 120,000 512,000
1998 0 392,000 120,000 512,000
1997 0 392,000 120,000 512,000
1996 0 392,000 120,000 512,000
Sales H�story
E Number Sale Date Sale Price Instrument Sale Reason
1677812 3/30/1999 Quit Claim Deed Other
Review History
Tax Yr Review# Review Type Appeal Val Hearing Dt Settlement Val Hearing Result Status
Permit History
Number Type Value Issue Date JurisdiMion Review Dt
Page 2 of 3
J
Parce1032305-9028 HENDRICKSON LORAN B
I3ome Improvement Exemption
Exempt No Bldg No Date Rec Date Comp Beg Yr Est Cost
Internet Resources
Summary Report for your area:
http://www.metrokc.gov/assessor/AreaReports/2005/AreaReportSums.htm#CommSpec
Visit Property Tax Information System to access your tax bill:
http://www.metrokc.gov/finance/treasury/kctaxinfo/
Visit Records Office's web site to view Excise Tax Affidavits:
http://I 46.129.54.93:8193/local ization/menu.asp
Visit GIS Parcel Viewer for the map of the parcel:
hrip://www5.mekokc.gov/parcelviewer?PIN�323059028
Glossary of Terms
http://www.metrokc.gov/Assessor/eRealProperty/GlossaryTerms.html
Page 3 of 3
Parce1032305-9020 HANCOCK JONAH-KAI
Parcel Data
Parcel 032305-9020 Present Use Single Family(Res Use/Zone)
Name HANCOCK JONAH-KAI Zoning R4
Sfte Address 11025 148TA AV SE 98059 JurisdicHon KING COUNTY
Area Code 032-004 Property Type Code R
Block Lot
Legal Description LOT 2 KCSP 877123 REC AF #7809060875 SD PLAT DAF S 330 FT OF E 660 FT OF SE 1/4 OF SE I/4 LESS C/M
RGTS LESS CO RD
Land Data
Land SqFt 35,400 Use Exemption
Acres 0.81 Environmental. No
Water WATER DISTRICT Topography No
Sewer/Septic PRIVAT'E Traf£c No
v1CWS
Rainier No Sound No
Olympics No Lk Wash No
Cascades No Lk Samm No
Territorial No Lk/Riv/Crk No
Seattle No Ot6er No
Waterfront
Location No Footage 0
Baak No Access Rights No
Tide/Shore No Prox.Intluence No
Restricted No Poor Quality No
Building/Improvement
Building Nbr 1 of 1 Llviug Units 1
Yr Built/Renov 1920 Bedrooms 3
Grade 6 Low Average Total Baths 1
Condition Very Good Basement 0
AGLA 1,446 Finished Bsmt 0
Accessory Imps N Covered Parking 0
Page 1 of 3
f
Parcel 032305-9020 HANCOCK JONAH-KAI
Tax Roll History
Appraised Taxable
Tax Omit TaxValue Land Val Imp Val Total Laad Val Imp Val Total
Yr Yr Reason
2006 0 129,000 109,000 238,000 129,000 109,000 238,000
2005 0 125,000 102,000 227,000 125,000 102,000 227,000
2004 0 86,000 96,000 182,000 86,000 96,000 182,000
2003 0 82,000 93,000 175,000 82,000 93,000 175,000
2002 0 78,000 79,000 157,000 78,000 79,000 157,000
2001 0 70,000 73,000 143,000 70,000 73,000 143,000
2000 0 68,000 59,000 127,000 68,000 59,000 127,000
1999 0 70,000 47,000 117,000 70,000 47,000 117,000
1998 0 65,000 44,000 109,000
1997 0 65,000 40,300 105,300
1996 0 65,000 40,300 105,300
Sales History
E Num6er Sale Date Sale Price Instrument Sale Reason
2073946 9/24/2004 266,000 Statutory Warranty Deed None
1957149 5/I/2003 61,537 Quit Claim Deed Other
Review History
Tax Yr Review# Review Type Appeal Val Hearing Dt Settleroent Val Hearing Resalt Status
Permit History
Number Type Value Issue Date Jurisdiction Review Dt
Home Improvement Exemption
Exempt No Bldg No Date Rec Date Comp Beg Yr Est Cost
Page 2 of 3
� `
Parce1032305-9020 HANCOCK JONAH-KAI
Internet Resources
Summary Report for your area:
http://www.metmkc.gov/Assessor/AreaReports/2005/ResidentiaV032.pdf
Visit Property Tax Information System to access your tax bill:
http://www.metrokc.gov/finance/treasury/kctaxinfo/
Visit Records Office's web site to view Excise Tax A�davits:
http://146.129.54.93:8193/localization/menu.asp
Visit GIS Parcel Viewer for the map of the parcel:
http://www5.metrokc.gov/pazcelviewer?PIN�323059020
Glossary of Terms
http://www.metrokc.gov/AssessodeRealPropeRy/GlossaryTerms.hdnl
Page 3 of 3
, . ;��Y. �� � . � " , . CITY OF .R�NTOI� �
_ , C�.,. , _ � _
e., _ , . Economic Development,Neighborhoods and. ,
� � d . . . . , . Strategic Plarining , ,
������ •Kathy Keolker,Mayor , • ' . , ` Alex Pietsch,Adininistrator ,
January 17,2007 � � . . . , .. . '
: . . State of,Washington . . . - , .
Boundary Review Board for Kirig County . - - - .
� � '_ Yesler Buildirig _ " . _, _
� _ . � 400 Yesler Way,�Room�402 , � - � . ' , �
: Seattle;WA 98.104: � - � ' � : ' �. -
: Subject: NOTICE 'OF� INTENTION TO EXFAND TI� CITY OF. ItE1�TTOI�, ' �
. .. , ' COI�OIBA'TE]LIMITS BY ANNEXATI0I�T , _ "
- � , - Dear Board 1Vlembers: � . , .
' , " � -_ As�required by Chapter 36.93.of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW); the Cit,y.of Renton� ,
� hereby gives notice of intention to annex territory hereafter, referred to as.the, "A'ster Park �. -
_ � Annexation." This,annexation is proposed under the 60% Direct Petition method in accordance" . -
. . with the applicable provisions of Chapter 35A.14-of. the RGW: .This annexation would ,. - ,
incorporate into the City of Reriton approxiinately T6.58 acres of.territory for tfie provision.of
. urban ser`vices. , � . ' . . :
° . To ass,ist..in. your consideration'of the proposed action, the required: articles and exhibits are � - ,. �,
enclosed and'numbered in accordance with the Board's suggested format. The $50.00 filing fee,
' is�also enclosed. � . . .. . . � . . . . . . . , ' ;
' Should questions arise during� the review of the information and exhibits provided with this . �
, Notice of Intention to Annex, please feeT free to contact Don Erickson, Senior Planner, at (425)', ' �- ,
, " , 430-6581: . . . , . " . , , . ` .
� � Please send notices and other communications regarding,the proposed annexation to: „ " . _
. .Don Erickson;AICP,�Senior Planner', � � ' ,
� - Deparhnent of Economic Development, . � ,
� . Neighborhoods.and Strategic Planning � ' � - , �
: . . .. Cityof Rentori . . � � `
- . - • 1055 S. Grady Way - - � , .. . '
, . ". � Renton,.WA.98055 ' � - � - . . . �
, Thank.you for your consideration. . • � : ' ' . . " , � � .
. . Sincerely, . . , , , � , , .. , ,
Katliy Keolker� " ' -� , . . , ; " : ; .
, ' , Mayor , , ,. , . , � .
. . 1055 South Grady Way-Renton;Washington 98055 '. � � l�f ''� �. 1V" .
,- . , . � ' , � . . � . . ..I. �' . � ' , ' ,'AHE'AD��O,F TIiE CTJRVE� � ..
- . . � �"Thispapetcontains50%recycledmateria1,30%postconsumer ' , '
� _ ..
�A. • •
Annexation Review Form
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
- Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Astor Park Annexation, A-05-008
Location : The proposed 16.58-acre irregularly shaped Lindberg Annexation is
located south of south of Sunset Boulevard NE (SR 900)west of
148�'Avenue SE. It only abuts the existing City boundary along its
northeast corner. The City will likely request that the Boundary
Review Board include the area to the north, across Sunset Blvd. NE
and south of the recently annexed Stoneridge Annexation to the
north, in order to avoid creating an unincorporated island. This
would also result in a more logical service area.
Date Circulated: Januarv 5, 2006 Comments Due: Januarv 12, 2006�
General Information
Area : 16.58 acres
Street length : 1,240 feet (existing)
Assessed Value : $1,977,500
Estimated Population : 49 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units and 28 trailor/manufactured
homes
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : +53 Dwelling Units
Future Po ulation • 122 eo le
Reviewing Department/Division: �'Y�a-�"" �-�-a-�+��-�.
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
� �
. / //
614G��� S ���� /�/'YD� �g SGX��` ?I�dN /�14�'HI4 . (Over)
� �� � �
�
�Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2
�'� ^ O1/OS/2006
2. Are you aware of any problems or de�ciencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
�V U
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
� �1� f".�w �c� 6VU��—'
�� �
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
f��„ ,,���..e ���� _`"
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation?
�
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City
services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
�� 3
General recommendation and comments:
�
Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2
''� " " � O1/OS/2006
�
Signature: Date:
1 � 13-- d (�
�,\///
7,a
�,�- `y'�
ASTER PARK ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS.SHEET
Units Po ulation AV
Existing dev. 35 49 $1,977,500
Full dev. 61 140 $31,477,000
Assumptions: 2.3 persons/household
$56,000 AV/existing unit
...................
$500,000 AV/new SF home
:REv�iii:ii:s�:`:�:�:'����:: Total revenues
Existing Full Rate Existing ::::::::;::::$:`f6;�46:<1:7::
Regular lev $6,226 $99,103 3.14843 Full::::::::::$1�;?252�.:��;;
Excess levy $155 $2,474 0.07861
State shared revenues
Rate (per cap) Existing Full
Liquor tax $3.93 $192.57 $550.20
Liquor Board rofits $7.41 $363.09 $1,037.40
Gas tax-unrestricted $23.69 $1,160.81 $3,316.60
MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Cam er excise $0.75 $36.75 $105.00
Criminal justice $0.22 $10.78 $30.80
Tofal $1,764.00 $5,040.00
Miscellaneous revenues
Rate Existing Full
Real estate excise* $48.57 $2,379.93 $6,799.80
Utilit tax** $133.20 $4,662.00 $8,125.20
Surface Water Utilit $199.80 $3,530.00
Fines &forfeits* $17.53 $858.97 $2,454.20
Total $8,100.70 $20,909.20
'` Per capita
"" Per housing unit- based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate
�Ci�sts:::::s:;::::::�:���:��::: Total ongoing costs
Per capita Existing Full Existing::::::;:::::�4;��2�<�4:
Contracted Services Full ::::::�:�:$1{3:3�s�3?�::8�:
....................
Alcohol $0.19 $9.31 $26.60
Public Defender $4.68 $229.32 $655.20
Jail $8.56 $419.44 $1,198.40
Subtotal $658.07 $1,880.20
Court/legal/admin. $66.92 $3,279.08 $9,368.80
Parks maintenance" $14.90 $730.10 $2,086.00
Police $276.89 $13,567.61 $38,764.60
Surface Water O & M $3,808.00 $8,539.00
Road maintenance** N/A $438.00 $3,650
Fire"*" $1.25 $2,471.88 $39,346.25
Total $24,952.74 $103,634.85
*See Sheet Parks FIA
'`*See Sheet Roads FIA
*** Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact
Existing ::::::::::::::�$8;�'Q�;�S�
F u I I :::::::::::::�:2:3x$�'1 r89
:al�e�fil�i3�e::G<is�S:;:Parks acquisition &development (from Sheet Parks FIA):
Other one-time costs: $35,383.00
Total one-time costs: :"`::::`$�:'�;72�;40:
Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo
�� �g .
PARKS ACQUISTION AND MAINTENANCE COST CALCULATION SHEE
Needs: ASTER PARK ANNEXATION
Acquisition of land for new neighborhood &community park
Development of new neighborhood &community parks
Maintenance of neighborhood &community parks
Assumptions:
$60,000 per acre for land acquistion
$125,000 per acre for development(both neighborhood &community parks)
$6,000 per acre to maintain neighborhood parks
$7,000 per acre to maintain community parks
1.2 acres/1,000 for neighborhood park(LOS in Comprehensive Park Plan)
1.1 acres/1,000 for community park(LOS in Comprehensive Park Plan)
140 population after 10 years (projected growth)
61 housing units after 10 years (projected growth)
$530.76 per single family unit mitigation fees
59 New single family units
Per capita annual and one-time costs:
One-time Costs: Acquisition:
Neighborhood: 1 " 1.2/1000 '"$60,000 = $72.00
Community: 1 * 1.1/1000 *$60,000 = $66.00
Development:
Neighborhood: 1 * 1.2/1,000 * $125,000= $150.00
Community: 1 * 1.1/1,000 * $125,000= $137.50
Total one-time costs: $425 per capita or $59,570.00
Mitigation fees: New units*$530.76 = $31,845.60
Acquisition &development costs minus mitigation fees: $27,724.40
Ongoing costs : (1 * 1.2/1,000 * $6,000) + (1 '" 1.1/1,000 *$7,000) _ $14.90
(park maintenance)
Ongoing costs Maintenance Cost : $2,086.00
,:�. -�
� r
ROADS MAINTENANCE CALCULATION SHEET FOR SCENARIO A
Zone AREA Linear feet
R-4 16.58 0 2569.9 (assumes 155 linear ft/ac)
R-5 0 0 0 (assumes 150 linear ft/ac)
R-6 0 0 0 (assumes 150 linear ft/ac)
R-8 0
R-8 0
R-8 0
R-8 0
R-8 0
R-8 10 0 (assumes 145 linear ft/ac)
R-10 0 0 0 (assumes 140 linear ft/ac)
2569.9 Estimated total linear feet of new roadway
Existing 0 0 350 Total linear feet of existing roadway
$437.50 Annual cost for existing roadways
Total 2919.9 Total estimated linear feet of roadway at full development
$3,650 Annual roadway maintenance cost at full develop.
Revised 8-29-03 per Finance Memo
I- ;
Annexation Review Form
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building �Sur.face Water Uti1i�
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Astor Park Annexation, A-05-008
Location : The proposed 16.58-acre irregularly shaped Lindberg Annexation is
located south of south of Sunset Boulevard NE (SR 900)west of
148th Avenue SE. It only abuts the existing City boundary along its
northeast corner. The City will likely request that the Boundary
Review Board include the area to the north, across Sunset Blvd. NE
and south of the recently annexed Stoneridge Annexation to the
north, in order to avoid creating an unincorporated island. This
would also result in a more logical service area.
Date Circulated: Januarv 5, 2006_ Comments Due: January 12, 2006
General Information
Area : 16.58 acres
Street length : 1,240 feet (existing)
Assessed Value : $1,977,500
Estimated Population : 49 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units and 28 trailor/manufactured
homes
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : +53 Dwelling Units
Future Po ulation • 122 eo le
Reviewing Department/Division: PUBLIC WORKS / Surface Water Utilitv
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or sigriificant problems for your
department/division? Yes:
The proposed Astor Park Annexation is located in the Greenes Creek sub-basin of the May
Creek basin. Greenes Creek drains to the North in the eastern half of the annexation area,
and flows into May Creek about 5000 feet north of the annexation. Per the fVlay Creek
Conditions Report of August 1995, erosion was occurring in Greenes Creek, and the
problem may worsen with increased flows. On pages 7-50 of the report, mitigation was
recommended for past increases in flows. We recommend Level 2 Conservation flow
control standard, per the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual, be required with
(Over)
. i
Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2
O1/12/2006
any new development or the adopted City standard at the time�of development if the
standard is equivalent or more restrictive. However, the�_�f_Rgr�aa-kias._adoRted Mav
Creek Basin plan recommendation #17, which requires full mitiqation Qr any fiitiirP inrrPa p
`in zonin.g_densit . Therefore, in the case of future development with higher density than the
zoning i en i ie in the May Creek Basin Plan, we recommend t a cqa w�teL
detention be designed pe 2005 KCSWD .el�--faow c9nt�ro standard, -�nd
Sencourage developers to investigate the feasibility of infiltration.
---___
Downstream, Greenes Creek passes through a King County residential area and also flows
through a City of Renton neighborhood at Lyons Ave NE. Greenes Creek is identified as a
Class 4 stream on the City of Renton Water Class Map. Any new -v lonment w' in the
� roIZ. p�d annexation area should be required to verify if there are streams or wetland�
�resent on e si e.
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service
provision to the area? Yes:
The resident of tax lot 177640-0020, 1500 ft downstream, has filed 17 drainage complaints
in the last 8 years. Also, other drainage complaints have been recorded in the Greenes
Creek area.
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
Yes
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
Maintenance demands will again increase when the area develops further and additional
storm system infrastructure is constructed. This will incrementally require additional
resources for maintenance of infrastructure from this and other annexations as well as new � �
development within existing City limits. At some point, the City will need additional �y�
personnel and equipment for maintenance due to new development and annexations. �" �°
Based on the c ���?..nt arnni ial,�_n�aratjpCl an mainten��e cost of 238 e�r acre�per year for ���,�
the whole city, the operation and maintenance for the 16.58-acre Astor Park annexation � �
area is estimated to be about $3,946 per year. This includes cost for both the maintenance
and engineering personnel in the Surface Water Utility.
Based on the current annual r�pital Improvement Project cost of$227 00 per acre pe�r year
for the whole city, CIP cost for the 16.58 acre Astor Park annexation is estimated to be
$4592.66 per year. L"v!/
Therefore, the total Surface Water Utility cost for O&M plus CIP is estimated to b $8,539 J
per year for the proposed annexation area. This assumes that we will provide the
level of O&M and CIP service that we currently provide within our existing City limits.
Existing Surface Water Utility revenue for the 3 single-family residences would be $199.8
per year. The total number of single-family reside es under full build out is estimated to be
53, so the maximum future revenue would b ,�5 . `
������e
H:�File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations�Astor Park�AstorParklO%.doc
:- ; :
Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2
O 1/12/2006
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation?
No storm water facilities that are owned and operated by King County are known to exist in the
proposed annexation area as the boundaries have been shown on this review form.
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City
services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
No
General recommendation and comments:
Greenes Creek is susceptible to erosion, which is in fact occurring in the present state. Due to
the proximity of residences downstream, it is likely we will receive more drainage complaints.
The need for mitigation by the City of Renton is a possibility.
Future development should be held to high environmental protection standards guided by the
May Creek Basin Plan. We should implement the 2005 KCSWDM Level 2 Conservation Flow
standard for storm water detention design. New developments should be required to provide
stream inventory and wetland inventory reports for their sites. This area drains to May Valley
floor, which floods due to the increase in volume of runoff for upstream tributary areas. Low-
density zoning is recommended due to the May Valley flooding and Greenes Creek flooding
and erosion problems. _ . .
'
Signatur : Date: � '�Z l���
Cc: Mike Stenhouse
Lys Hornsby
Raymond van der Roe
H:�F'ile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 26-Annexations�Astor Park�AstorParklO%.doc
�
i
"~ �������
JAN � � 2006 Annexation Review F'orm
CITY OF RENTON
[X] �b$�1'V�'��r�Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire �� �t�'��,.
Parks Wastewater tility
Police Transportation _
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Astor Park Annexation, A-05-008
Location : The proposed 16.58-acre irregularly shaped Lindberg Annexation is
located south of south of Sunset Boulevard NE (SR 900)west of
148th Avenue SE. It only abuts the existing City boundary along its
northeast corner. The City will likely request that the Boundary
Review Board include the area to the north, across Sunset Blvd. IVE
and south of the recently annexed Stoneridge Annexation to the
north, in order to avoid creating an unincorporated island. This
would also result in a more logical senrice area.
Date Circulated: Januanr 5, 2006 [�or�rn�� � �ue• �u n� , -+ � .�
General Information
Area : 16.58 acres
Street length : 1,240 feet (existing)
Assessed Value : $1,977,500
Estimated Population : 49 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units and 28 trailor/manufactured
homes
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : +53 Dwelling Units
Future Po ulation • 122 eo le
Reviewing Department/Division: �,�Z,✓ �11�� �'�-►` �'�+
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division?
.� �� G16'1:� �G 1`j j�� —('�3�I,t� ���� �� ���2t�'f�� a
�� �
���`� /°!O� `� �6��� 7ll�( /��f1'1�/ (Over)
,�, �,� -�, �D`lo�d�s P° �
I
, _�:"
Attachment to Annexation Review Form
For Proposed Astor Park Annexation,A-OS-008-10% Notice of Intent
Reviewing Department: Water Utility Engineering
by Abdoul Gafour(x7210)
January 10,2006
1. Does the annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division?
The proposed annexation is within the water service area of King County Water District No. 90 (W.D#90)
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in e�sting infrastructure or service provision to the
area?
The applicants shall contact Water District 90 (425-255-9600) and request a certificate of water
availability from the District prior to any development within the annexation area.
3. Does this proposed expanded annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?
Not applicable. The proposed annexation is within the water service area of King County Water District
No. 90.
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this enlarged area? Can you identify
any other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
Developer's extensions of Water District 90's water main will be required to provide water for fire
protection and for domestic use for development within the annexation area. The applicant shall obtain a
certificate of water availability from KCWD#90.
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation?
No. Ownership of water mains owned and operated by KCWD#90 District will remain the same within
their water service boundary. The District currently does not have a franchise to operate its water facilitie;
within the City limits and rights-of-way.
Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes,
please indicate on the attached map.)
No. Water service boundaries are established by existing coordinated water system plan and
comprehensive water system plans.
Page 1 of 2
H:�File Sys\WTR-Drinking Water Utility\WTR-03-CorrespondenceWnnexation-review�Astor-Park-annexation-
10%.011006.doc�.AG
'�� • ��
General recommendation and comments:
Applicants shall contact KCWD#90 and obtain water availability certificate prior to any development within
annexation area. Please notify WD#90 regarding proposed annexation.
KCWD#90
15606 SE 128`"St
Renton,WA 98059
Attn: Tom Hoffman—Manager
425-255-9600
Signature: �� ����''�' Date: January 10,2006
Abdoul Gafour �'��-21,b,
Water Utility Supervisor
Page 2 of 2
H:�File Sys\WTR-Drinking Water Utility\WTR-03-Correspondence�.Annexation-review\Astor-Park-annexation-
10%.011006.doc�P.G
, *
;' ,
, � .
Annexation Review Form
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility
�Ii- Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Astor Park Annexation, A-05-008
Location : The proposed 16.58-acre irregularly shaped Lindberg Annexation is
located south of south of Sunset Boulevard NE (SR 900)west of
148th Avenue SE. It only abuts the existing City boundary along its
northeast corner. The City will likely request that the Boundary
Review Board include the area to the north, across Sunset Blvd. NE
and south of the recently annexed Stoneridge Annexation to the
north, in order to avoid creating an unincorporated island. This
would also result in a more logical service area.
Date Circulated: Januarv 5, 2006 Comments Due: Januarv 12, 2006�
General Information
Area : 16.58 acres
Street length : 1,240 feet (existing)
Assessed Value : $1,977,500
Estimated Population : 49 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units and 28 trailor/manufactured
homes
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : +53 Dwelling Units
Future Po ulation � 122 eo le
Reviewing Department/Division:
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division? / - � 1 �1 f .L Aw
, �l� �al��fL lJaA/L ls I'1c�I" itn ��7a4T Cc�Lacli 71c�N . I_r�f�
1
�� �c��� w�J b�� a ��u ���-`� -
I_- Q1 l`/�(//�,�,v /'70� �g' SG��/�` �ldj{ /�l4YN'14/ (Over)
S�, �jj�i .�tzj �Od! d�S /�'°
i�"' .v.
• '�
Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2
O1/OS/2006
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
departmenUdivision?
y�S
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
J c�,�� �� s.�.�i�e �e.� ��, c1,es..,f- a�e)e c� ,
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation?
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City
services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
General recommendation and comments:
. �
Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2
O1/OS/2006
Signature: �l'�� Date: � • t�•�z�
, C�'^ ^ ���
, Jq �����
Annexation Review Form �` T�a � `��006
nspo�atio
[X] 10% Notice of Intent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition "Sysr�ms��V
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks Wastewater Utility -
Police ���
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
����
SUBJECT . ark Annexation, A-05-008
.� ���
Location : The proposed 16.58-acre irregularly shaped � nnexation is
located south of south of Sunset Boulevard ��R 900)west of
148th Avenue SE. It only abuts the existing City boundary along its
northeast corner. The City will likely request that the Boundary
Review Board include the area to the north, across Sunset Blvd. NE
and south of the recently annexed Stoneridge Annexation to the
north, in order to avoid creating an unincorporated island. This
would also result in a more logical service area.
Date Circulated: January 5, 2006 Comments Due: Januanr 12, 2006�
General lnformation
Area : 16.58 acres
Street length : 1,240 feet (existing)
Assessed Value : $1,977,500
Estimated Population : 49 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units and 28 trailor/manufactured
homes
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : +53 Dwelling Units
Future Po ulation � 122 eo le
Reviewing Departmen Divisio : �KA-+�SPot2T�TloN SyS���tS
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your
dep_artment/division? _ _ _ ____ - �
' No. However, on NE Sunset Boulevard(SR 900) along the portion of the proposed annexation
site abutting the Aster Park development(easterly half of the annexation site), acquisition of
right-of-way may be required to accommodate WSDOT future plans to widen SR 900. The
Aster Park development was not obligated to dedicate right-of-way, but a 20-foot building
� setback was established to accommodate any future right-of-way needs. Along the westerly half
' of the annexation site abutting NE Sunset Boulevard(SR 900) acquisition or dedication of right-
of way may be required to,accommodate WSDOT future plans to widen SR 900.� _ _. '
D �� S ���� I"!O� �g �sh��` �ldN /,�14�'N�4� (over) �
�, �� -� �t `! � P°
��� . .
•� � . 2
� '` exation,A-44-QQ$ _
41105/2Q06
On 148`�'Avenue SE along the partion of the proposed annexation area abutting the Aster Park
development site(west side af 148�'Avenue NE} dedication of right-af-way has occurred.
However, this dedication may not be sufficient to accommodate any future widening of 148�'
Avenue SE. Therefore, acquisition of additional right-of-way abutting the Aster Park
development site may be required. For the two properties abutting the north and east limits of
the Aster Park deveiopment site and within the propased annexation area, acquisition or
dedicatian af right-of-way may be required to accommodate any future widening of 148tn
Avenue SE.
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficisncies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?
Yes. Regarding 148t�'Avenue SE abutting the proposed annexation site,roadway pavement and
width and thickness do not meet City of Renton standards. Curb,gutter, and sidewalks exist
only on the west side of the street abutting the Aster Park development site. Street lighting exists
on the east side af 148`h Avenue SE.
Regarding NE Sunset Boulevard(SR 900), curb,gutter, sidewalks and street lighting are non-
existent alang the frontage af the proposed annexation area. (The Aster Park develapment was
nat required to install these aff-site improvements along NE Sunset Boulevard.) Also, roadway
width and tl}ickness is sub-standard for this State higliway.
Currently,King County and WSDOT have plans for street improvements at the Sunset
Boulevard(SR 900)/148`�'Avenue SE intersectian(including raadway widening to three lanes on
the Sunset Boulevard east and west approaches to the intersection,traffic i�lands and a traffic
signal). These improvements are planned for installation within the next two to three years.
The City of Renton and King County have na plans for street improvements on the remaining
portions of NE Sunset Boulevard(SR 900) and 148th Avenue SE abutting the propased
annexation site. However,WSDOT has identified a need for roadway widening and realignment
of SR 9Q0 abutting the proposed annexation area but has no timetable for when this might occur.
Any additional upgrading of 148th Avenue SE abutting the proposed annexation area and any
new local access streets within the proposed annexation area would be at the expense of existing
property owners and(or future new development, Alsa, any additional upgrading of NE Sunset
Baulevard(SR 9Q0)abutting the proposed annexation area would also be at the expense of
existing property owners and or new development unless installed by a praposed WSI70T
irnprovernent project.
3. Does this propased annexation represent a iogicaf extension of services provided by your
depa�tment/division?
Y�s!
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexatian?
Additional transpartation staff wauld not be required. Upgrading 14$=h Avenue SE abufting the
proposed annexation area and any rtew tocal access streets within the propased annexation area
meeting City of Renton standards would be at the expense of existing property owners and/or
new development. LTpgrading NE Sunset Boulevard{SR 900}within the proposed annexatian
area would alsa be at the expense of existing praperty awners andior new development uniess
installed by a proposed WSDQT improvement project.
�i . = * �
� ��� � �"'� �' � , 3
�xario�,A-aa-oos �
01105/20{�d
Energy costs associated with street lighting, and costs assaciated with maintenance af street
signage and pavement markings that may be incurred by the City should not be a financial
burden. �
5. Would the City assume ownership or r�sponsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
lay another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation?
��� , "� �aa�� N� S��s�-�"'8I�r� �t��ti�'-a�-u.�ay t�t�st�e � ��o��,,,S�c� d"t k�t�'k�t�1�+�
� �
�ve� ���e C t�a� td� �-�-sc�m�e o�rc-�sl►��, ov r��'���s�be l�`� ��, �r�y �x�s�i.y
.e
J��"�.�►�c,•c �r��$�r��+ao�-a�f��Pd ���as���c��{ �u�st�1��'0� �#-�.e.
G��d�ar �w��ow, �t�t.�.s�1+�T wa*�e� �c ,�f��sdbl..�-- �- �� �a.�,�!�ay.
6. Wou1d alternate boundaries create a more (agical annexation for provision of Ciiy
services? (if yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
��,'.. �1,�t/-�' � t� �=��G.�t�`�'" UI t �''i't '�� �+�Zerr.€,�d+�d�'S 2S'
��GV'�'`C!o't���f J�p�'�05�G�'t
General recommendation and comments:
.�`°.I�,. �t���.��Cs�-�"'p�`�f�� ���"��� ���r�r�� �i a s� �� �.� ������s
����.�-�c� ������ ��s �,����,�.e�� ���a��� ,��� ��,� ��
���� np � �����r. � .
Signature: ��e�V" G'4(G�J�- Date: I I z ��6 �
D�Vtst�r► Revte.+�v �oavd!►n.a'}'�+�
� ' ';
� ������� -
JAN � � 2006 Annexation Review �orna
CJTY GF RENTO�d
[X] 10°��I��OTt�cseY���ent [ ] 60% Annexation Petition
TO : Building Surface Water Utility
Fire Water Utility
Parks [�Ja������r ��iiitv�
Police Transportation
Public Works Niaintenance Current Planning
FROM : Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
SUBJECT . Astor Park Annexation, A-05-008
Location : The proposed 16.58-acre irregularly shaped Lindberg Annexation is
located south of south of Sunset Boulevard NE (SR 900)west of
148th Avenue SE. It only abuts the existing City boundary along its
northeast corner. The City will likely request that the Boundary
Review Board include the area to the north, across Sunset Blvd. NE
and south of the recently annexed Stoneridge Annexation to the
north, in order to avoid creating an unincorporated island. This
would also result in a more logical service area.
Date Circulated: Januarv 5, 2006 ��mmer� �s � � • �nuar�r �� a T�
General Information
Area : 16.58 acres
Street length : 1,240 feet (existing)
Assessed Value : $1,977,500
Estimated Population : 49 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 3 Dwelling Units and 28 trailor/manufactured
homes
Commercial : N/A
Industrial : N/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: : +53 Dwelling Units
Future Po ulation • 122 eo le
Reviewing Department/Division: �s�.'�"�,���2��,� �.°''��-,�s
1. Does this annex�tion represent any unique or significant problems for your
department/division? `'� — ���� �:��d.T.�,,���� ��i�,���?��--
�,� `� 'S6IYJ�� 7T�G�( �f�dl��/ (Over)
.¢� ��`!�� s �'�� p�°r�o�
�- �� 5
.-. . �
.;. •_�
�;�`
Lindberg Annexation,A-04-008 2
O1/OS/2006
2. Are you aw,re of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision
to the area?��.�
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your
department/division?��,�� �,���r2l�'.�'���i�����
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve thiS area? Can you identify any
other costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �„����
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed
by another jurisdi tion? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this
annexation? �� �,
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City
services? (If yes, please indicate on the attached map.)
a.
General recommendation and comments:
���-� ✓���'- ���� �������'��
.� jy
J�,� /��'.��-��'� �� .�i�e-���/F-� �'C,�i���l ����� ����
¢���.� ����' �''��'���
�; , `
� x � Lindber Annexation,A-04-008 2
g
O1/OS/2006
Sign e:�. Date: �
-r''� ECN-3663-OS -RE: Assessed Value Question Page 1 of 2
Jonah-kai Hancock
From: Roe, Stan [Stan.Roe@METROKC.GOV] on behalf of Info, Assessor
[assessor.info@METROKC.GOV]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 11:06 AM
To: Jonah-kai Hancock
Subject: ECN-2485-06 - ECN-3663-05 - RE: Assessed Value Question
�-� , ��, .:.,.-: x: ,, .r-�, -, ...,��,� � -';
F �� , ;�; .:.k �. �. �;{ k� s �ar� �i p1��. �kh�y C� t� ir�v � �r��s�i 1�. �9����a �:Q1�thr�ug�0��90
�. � t , �d'i � v ,�s �ec,._�ra,�_pci�F��i 7�h�r�, yc�u.��
�� :.
„�.,�
,= 11U. `o.e
�:E;C ��I`,f�A;S�i.��•��'U�`
C}�-�^6-509£3 . '
Frorn: Jonah-kai Hancock [mailto:JonahH@concur.com]
Sent: Monday, August 07,�2006 9:06 AM �
To: Info, Assessor
Subject: RE: ECN-3663-05 - RE: Assessed Value Question
Stan -
Can you please let me know if the land values have been updated to include the new construction as mentioned
below?
Thanks so much,
JK
Jonah-kai�Iancock
Director Product Marketing � Concur Technologies
(425)497-6408
Jonahh(�concur.com
Frore�e: Roe, Stan [mailto:Stan.Roe@METROKC.GOV] On Behalf Of Info, Assessor
�en�: W�dnesday, Jecember 14, 2005 9:45 Ai�1
To: Jonah-kai Hancock
Subjecto ECN-3663-05 - RE: Assessed Value Question
The values are for land only,no improvement values have been determined yet. This is a new plat and values will not be
determined until sometime next year. We have until July 31 to pick up any new construcrion. You have the latest
information. Thank you.
S.W.Roe
Executive Assistant
206-296-5098
-----Original Message-----
From: JONAHH
Sent:Tuesday,December 13,2005 12:50 PM
8/31/2006
: �. ECN-3663-OS - RE: Assessed Value Question Page 2 of 2
To: Info,Assessor
Subject:Assessed Vahie Question
On"12/13/2005" at"12:SOPM":A customer comment from Jonahlcai Hancock was posted from the King County webpage
http://�vww.metrokc.gov/assessor/and mailed to assessor.info@metrokc.gov
Subject: Assessed Value Question
Corrunent Type: subject selection
Email Address:jonahh@concur.com
Regards-
I am a home owner in the Renton Highlands and am working on annexation into the city of Renton. I own parcel mimber
0323059020-along side my property John Noizis of Norris Homes has a development,Aster Park which is nearing
completion-46:ots being sold for SOOF�a lot. He signed a covenant with the city of Renton,which I have a copy of,to join
the city which should be taking place in the first part of 2006.
I want to join his annexation proposal and have had Don Erickson in the city of Renton draft an annexation document for
me. What I need to know for this document is what his John Norris's assessed value is now that he has a short-subdivision
and houses are nearing completion and being sold? I used the County Assessor's online tool to search for the value of these
parcels but it was quite low and I wanted to make sure I had the latest inforxnation. The parcel numbers I am referring to
(that John Norris own)are parcel numbers 0323059026 and 0323059251.
Any help you could provide would be much appreciated.
Thanlcs,
Jonah-kai Hancock
Jonahh@concur.com
206-234-9673
An email response has been requested.
8/31/2006
�
AST r I� 1'ARI� ANNEXATION - 10% 1'ETITION
���ID,, �.:; �.::. '�� �;��� �Q►w�er �,� . .,.. . ,.....�.�sessedYalue :Size ' ; �
�... �_�._� _ ��. . , . . ,a.��.��
032305 9028 Loran Hendrickson $887,500 6.0 acres
502 8"'Avenue NE
Auburn,WA 98002 �� �
032305 9026 Norris Homes $344,000 5.81 acres
10516 172nd Ct. SE
Renton,WA 98059
032305 9251 Norris Homes $254,000 3.27 acres
10516 172°d Ct. SE ��
Renton,WA 98059 ��
032305 9020 Jonah-Kai Hancock $238,000 0.81 acres
11025 148�`Ave SE
Renton,WA 98059
032305 9250 Alekandr&Renata $254,000 0.69 acres
Bezman
11045 148`i'Ave SE
Renton,WA 98059
TOTALS ; ;$1,977;500 , �6 58 acres
�����
��-,���� '� �s C� �-����� �v — l�l ����.
/, �j �;r�y, ��j � �.�p� ¢` },r� ���/� /� �
��Z�iil2'�— (.^� 'Pi£�`�'v'If'�"8'.i� t.�:�7/� � �t� ,'rt"���4"� jyf/ " �i(�' 'G
n �f'�''L (C
�
��� �' ��� /�'��D
�� . �-�:��� �� ���
-t � �
( J .� fi��,,��
� ��r � S�4 � ��Y�r ����� �
r d �� �� �� {*,.....-�
� ����
,
-_- ._______..___�_
. , .�.�;r_________.---_ _ -
�� � �a`i
�,.: ��fi,
�_.
�
�
i
; �
�,` � � ,.
�:J�{ ��t ����:�
�
�'f `i,f 1,:+` �r��
iJ
J\", f
�
�'t��� j�
�,p I f ��
���.
�-`
ASTER PARK ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET ,
Units Population AV
Existing dev. 67 140 $16,132,500
Full dev. 62 '143 $26,632,500
Assumptions: 2.3 persons/new SF household
$56,000 AV/existing unit(including mobile,homes)
..................
$500,000 AV/new SF home
:REveitiues::�:�:::::::::: Total revenues
Existing Full Rate Existing ::::'::'::::::.$��;�:�8:4:Z:
Regular lev $50,792 $83,851 3.14843 Full:?:�:�:'::$1:'f2.�33�;:84;
Excess lev $1,268 $2,094 0.07861
State shared revenues
Rate (per ca Existing Full
Li uor tax $3.93 $550.20 $561.99
Li uor Board rofits $7.41 $1,037.40 $1,059.63
Gas tax- unrestricted $23.69 $3,316.60 $3,387.67
MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Camper excise $0.75 $105.00 $107.25
Criminal justice $0.22 $30.80 $31.46
Total $5,040.00 $5,148.00
Miscellaneous revenues
Rate Existing Full
Real estate excise* $48.57 $6,799.80 $6,945.51
Utilit tax** � $133.20 $8,924.40 $8,258.40
Surface Water Utilit $199.80 $3,530.00
Fines &forfeits* $17.53 $2,454.20 $2,506.79
Total $18,378.20 $21,240.70
* Per capita
"'` Per housing unit-based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6%tax rate
:�Qg�g::::::::::::::::;:::;�':: Total ongoing costs
�� � Per ca ita Existing Full Existing::::::::::::.��;�1:'��<�3:
Contracted Services Full :::::::::::::�$��695;:6�;
Alcohol $0.19 $26.60 $27.17
Public Defender $4.68 $655.20 $669.24
Jail $8.56 $1,198.40 $1,224.08
Subtotal $1,880.20 $1,920.49
Court/legal/admin. $66.92 $9,368.80 $9,569.56
Parks maintenance* $14.90 $2,086.00 $2,130.70
Police $276.89 $38,764.60 $39,595.27
Surface Water O & M $3,808.00 $8,539.00
Road maintenance''* N/A $438.00 $3,650
Fire*** $1.25 $20,165.63 $33,290.63
Total $76,511.23 $98,695.65
*See Sheet Parks FIA
**See Sheet Roads FIA
*** Rate per$1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) Net fiscal impact
Existing ::::::::::::::`$:�;(1��:$f�
Full�`'::::::::�;1:3�f3:�'':2(�
:Cl�fe::Eiii�?e;Gpsti�:;:Parks acquisition &development(from Sheet Parks FIA):
Other one-time costs:
Total one-time costs: :;;;:;:;:;�`�$�2�;RQ0<9�:
Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo
�,� _;,.� .�,�.., �,� .
Donald Enckson Aster Park Annexation Corrected Page 1 ;
From: Janet Conklin
To: addressmailing
Date: 07/03/2007 10:01:03 AM
Subject: Aster Park Annexation - Corrected
Please add the following address change to the list I sent out yesterday. It seems to have dropped off the
list before printing.
OLD ADDRESS NEW ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER
14635 SE 111th St 5401 NE 13th ST 0293850240
Thanks,
Jan Conklin
City of Renton
Development Services Division
jconklin@ci.renton.wa.us
425-430-7276
Fax 425-430-7231
, � ;� t �,r ,I rt
U lY — -—_— r — —
� — �� �� � ,—L � ry — i�
� � I � � I
. _ �� � �, —�-�� � . —�—� —
� � /�., I � L— � j i
� �-- , ��. ��i �
; �..� x Y , fi� __ �� �---�---� �
�, � �� ��_ ., , �
. �
..,ro _�, � �
x . , . .
I ` , a � ��— �t� --
� � •x �.: � � � I
— ,.� --� .
� x,�� � ..�. � ���� — �� � � � � -
� x ,n,. ., _ ,,.� � �n ��
. I— ,.
, , ..� � I , � ,� .nx ,.
:
� r- — _ ��, w ,, � �, ,s�� � � - �-- _
, � �
�r, � r 1 �,» � ;, ���: �_
��.,� � ��. � x�r- .�r .,.� �� _�
, � , , ..",� . � K ,,A., i .:�.„. ,%
\�� y . �` �\ ,�e y
� » � �� � �� '�� �
\ ;, � �J x , � G�.� ,,%� .
, T, „� � J`/��{ \ , �
` � \\�'� / b� 1/'��//�\\ _ ��1�� �'.�l- ' �'°g�
� ' \ 1 x .y � V I \� . —` M —_
� J
\ 1 /
t - /
�e ' Y �i�c �'�� ` n �
� � ` ,� � ' � r " ' �
�. . ,n�,
o � � � �
� , ,
..s.,�� � � � ,, � � , n . /
� � �._u �
p �, � ..� . � .,�
����C�� � . � . �
.x.. � � ' �` . .q %� x
� ���� ,� .
M ; � � � -�-� ,.�. y y .ar .�
� i � �A . T
� �� �
� ..w. _ -.
- �---i —� � �� �� „ � � ,.,, �
��� � �n- � .. .ar.
, � �, � , --�
� � �— , � . ti �
, . ,�. .�., — � �- —'' --���� � '
. ���� ..,, � 11
_ � . . � . ..� �
. � � � � — , — _ � .
�
, � .
, �A ���� � � � r .,..,
� �, , ��,, � � .�, ,., E
� ; x �
,. a � , Q . . � w, . �
,.� --_ , `_� _T�=�__' _ Y , , r -��--�
\ � � -�---µ=�-- Thb docummt b a�aphic represantatim.not O��teed
� � � J r to wrvey oceurxy,fnten0ed for city purpo�n mly ond
"„7-1 � � �� «S�".. ' Do�ed on th�be�t iniormotion awiloEb w of tM tlate�hoMn.
_ ,� Thb map le fw dkDlaY purpoaes only.
Proposed Aster Park Annexation ° 3°° 6°°
Figure 2:Topography Map 1 : 3600
G�jY�0�,�, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning 1m Interval Countour
����� Alex Pietsch,Administrator - - RQntOfl CI��IfT11lS
G.DeI Rosano
��NTo'$ 10 January zoo� O Proposed Annexation Area
i �
j �
�
i �
i � --I—�
i �
/ I i
i
� I
I
�
�\
V�
� � �e�
� .
��
, �
�
t
� 1 � t�
, �.
� Tl�h Aocumant la a 4aphk representation,not quarmteed
to w�y accurxy,(tended fw city purpo�et mly md
baeW the beet nformotbn owiobla m of th�date�hown.
� Thb mop is for dieplay purpoeea only.
Proposed Aster Park Annexation ° 3°° 6°°
Figure 4: Sensitive Areas Map 1 : 3600
G�Y-�„�, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning � Erosion Hazard _
� �1� Alex Pietsch,Administrator Wetland Boundary —' Renton City Limits
,�, ��� G.Del Rosario o O Proposed Annexation Area
�NTo 10 January 2006 � >40/o Slope
�
p ��; ,��°,, �Ma
, � I
� �
�j -- �
1 , _
�
� � �� � °
, \
�
� ---� � �
' — i :, ,��, �\ �
� � i \\ �
i � �` �
� ' � ,
� ; _
-- __1— � —
°� i I
¢�� ' � I
���.:� � ;
. : I �
� \ I
� , ��
�
��
� � � � - - -
; � � .
� �
� ��:
- ,��
; g
�
�� �
� �
�
� I i � � �
;
i j i ; '��
� —
� �
��
— _�_ _ � � .
4 � I
I � � I
f
}
�
� '
_�..�j� . ' I
'� Thfs doLUTent b O q�hi�fpfeaenlOtlon�t o9nla�d�
\ . to wrvey occurocy,f to y purp y m
baeed an tAs bwt'iwmalion awAable ae of ths dote ehown.
��� iTb map le for dlsplay Durpoeee only.
Proposed Aster Park Annexation o 200 400
Figure 5: Aerial Map
1 : 2400
Uti�Y�t, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning - - R2I1t0i1 City LIf111tS
��� 4 Alex Pietsch,Administrator Proposed Annexation Boundary
G.Del Rosario
��NT�� 10 January 2006
SPECIAL POPULATION CENSUS
SUMMARY SHEET
( �; � �'�
Total Population: �' t ' Year or Ordinance: �� � {`�
� Lines 1+2
�
City/Town: ��!+������, / l��-<;°
��) �2) �3) �4)
Total Vacant Occupied Pop.Per Percent Percent
Housing Housing Housing Occ. HU Occupied Vacant
Units Per Structure Units Units (1)-(2) Population (4)/(3) (3)/(1) (2)/(1)
1-Unit Structures � � "� , 'r '��� � �; -�, :� ��, � '"'3 ,.� � � � ,
,
2-Unit Structures
3-Unit Structures
4-Unit Structures
5 or more Units
^� :.x; � � ;� . �„�y,� ,� �{�� � �. 4, �
Manufactured Homes ,��.,� • • �� , � � , ,,� � �- � `' �
Special*
1. Totals �� ;.:� - �`,� � ;ia • I �S ` � � � %� , ;� t�l. e � 's -
*Special Housing: Unusual living quarters not generally considered a housing unit(e.g., boats, boxcars,tents, etc.). Only
counted when occupied by person(s)meeting"resident°criteria. Specify type of housing in comments section below.
Group Quarters Number of Facilities Population
Nursing/Convalescent Homes
College Dormitories
Mental/Correctional Institutions
Military Installations(e.g., barracks, BEQ)
Other(Specify):
2. Total Group Quarters Q .
Number of Staff Hours Worked
Census Costs""' lf known /f known CosUEstimated Value
City staff w/o additional pay and/or volunteer staff � $
City staff and/or hired stafflconsultant with payment 7-. �`r�.- %�,� $ r.,� %�r
ti
Transportation, supplies, etc. ifnotinc/uded above $
Total $
''This information is used to provide cities with an estimate of how much it costs to census. Your assistance in providing this informat�on is
valuable and appreciated.
Did the enumerators collect additional information or pertorm other tasks during the census? Yes No (circle one)
Comments: ,y� r e; � `` � � ,�^� t� �"' ° �
,1..��''r��t�.1. ,E+�^ .J�+,S"�st?, �' v�. T Ft b, S �'C J!�n'�,� s�S..�cti
�, v`'1 f�'�:eya"�s:� "�r�? .�F°+�..�.a�'�C'3��a Q/� ���,�':r'`et?r �/^>. �+`,q`"',a `.f�'�`^ n,;` `*4e;,°�' R� �ty `�= t'�,.j � i.
_ , „ 5
Y\4.�1).�4Lt Y-;•��6�,G`q. �.F..�t %�,:.(!��`�� ~i���MR% �'n �G.+"41�.��� M�. .• � ln�J,� �/J Plt.rv..��Iw� r A� l 4 .. ..,, 9. 3..'(�(`T� ��?� I��6.�-'�}�'R
Census Administrator or Contact Person ` ' ��
U si � •
�..��?`h�. 1�\K r �fi 1 ,� ����` � �-2 /2- d
Name Si ned:
K3tn e.ol:ker, Mayor (Date)
Tele hone#: ` �F�� Y `�`��.� Attest: /
" a
p su,,�� K: ,-� . • �,f� /� D�
9 ._ -- -
B�onni�, I.. Walton, City �Clerk
Da s/Hours of O eration: - ` -
Office of Financial Management State of Washington Revised 9/2006