HomeMy WebLinkAboutCED Planning File �
�
�
�
�
�'
�
�
�
�
3
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
4
�,
k
t
C
F
�
@
9
�
S4
!
s
�
I
i
• � . . . ,� _. - �. , � - .. � - - ------ ------ =---- �
�
. , €
• ` �g Range Planning �
� Denis Law '
= . Mayor �. �.Cl� C �
. - . . , f ._' ��'"� , p
� . �. ~� '� ��f � , �
, , - � � _ ��'�� . . a
. _ • �. � Department of Community and Economic Development. , _ . �
- ' - - , - � C:E."Chip"Vincent,InterimAdministrator � . _, �
; - . , . � ' � , _' ` '" . � - , � �
� � . - _ .. ; , , - �
- . - . " . ' - - � . � �
� � � `; EFFECTIVE DATE:�J.uly 4, 2012 - . ' :_ . - - . �
.. _ ' ,. . . . . , . , � . . . . , �
- , : - SUBJECT: ADDRESS GHANGES AT THE WINDSTONE V,ANNEXATION ~ - ;. - ` � � �
' .. - . , - - , , � .- � - ; ; _ . . . . � .- �
. . _ : . . . . . . , . . �
� .� : TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ; _ � � � ' ;
_ - . ;. . `_ _ . _ ; .. .. _: ' �
'. � �Please.no.te the_following address changes made necessary by�he Su.nset East Annexation: -
, - .. ; _ � � : , :. - . �
� • . OLD ADDRESS ,. � NEW ADDRESS � . PARCEL:NUMBER � _ - - - ". �
_ - . , �
" ;14622 SE RENTON ISSAQUAH RD �5418.NE SUNSET;BLVD ' .0323059121 ` � . ` �
,: � � .�14626 SE RENTON.ISSAQUAH RD . 5506 NE SUNSET BLVD 0323059070.. � " : � �
. � � , .
---------14620-SE RENTON ISSAQUAH-RD--_5412 NE-SUN,SET BL-UD,=---0323059234---�— = --------== �
- ,-14600 SE RENTON ISSAQUAH RD 5400.NE SUNSET BLVD�. , 0323059017 - ' - �
� 14614 SE RENTON ISSAQUAH RD 5406 N:E SUNSET BLVD 0323059230_ - : . - , �
, :. . �.� . . ' , � � _ - _ �
- . - . -- . ', . - . - _ ; . .. ,
. Sincerely; . _ - . _ , � . " . -. :
- L�,` . : : - _ ' ` , � . � � �
' Jan`Conkiin - _.- ` . .
Deve.l.opment Services Re,presentative `. � ' � ' _
� . � : Developrnent 5ervices Department �. - ' �� $
� .Telephone: (425) 430-7276 . . . ` . , . �
_ . . . - . _ , � . - _ ' �
- � . � . . _ � ` : . i
_. , , , .
. . ; . - � -, - , _ � �
` . . � . . _ ' . � I
� � . : . -. �., .- . i . � _. , : . . - . �
' ; � � :. � - . , , : � � . , : �
. .. , . � . . - . .. � - � . � �
' � � ' _ ' . , ' ' . . ' . . ' . ' . ' .. , � ' . � . ' j
� � �' , . . . . �' �� � _ ' , . � � � �.", ..~ � ,. ' � - .� � . ' � . , .. , �
' - . - . , ' , " . . . . . . �
� . . ,. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . - ' . ' - ' ' . . " �
` . _' . . ' � ' ' . , � ' . ' . . , � _ . . '� . � ., §
; �_ , . � .. . . , ., ' �� � . ' _ ,'_ � .. �- . � ., - ' ' � �. E
, Renton.City Hall •,1055 South Grady Way • Renton,Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov � . " . 3
- - -- - - -- -- .— ---- --- -.—,- — - � -- -- , �-- --�— -. --- --_- ---- - - �
j
i as � �
�, � _�.._�.�._.��� � , �. �,_. __.� I . .. � _�_Friva#e-Rd
��"" L�....,._��s-'"" f r � 1 1 � �,
, ���
,..........w_.-. `�5 � � w � ...... �
� , � _ w , i --�----�--� .,�
H� ° � �......�_...�, �_�.�_.. 1 P1E 7# � �.
��a.�, N � � �..�..__
4 i m�/ �� �ry °�' � i w
� � � i i ci � � � 1 � ...,.....
�1 � � ��1�6t } � --� -- � a ..�..
r �
6t�.�.�t. � � �___._ # � �5
,�...._._..._�_..�, � � � `—
� � _..�..__
, ._-.--�----�"�'"i� �__' ; €,. �
, �. � � ; �,::� �
. .
� i ��:::,:�:,�.;;:.
: . : . ::
_��
��. � �.:....::...::.
r� i ¢ __._ � ; � :
f � � � � �'I� . �.::
�� ---� � � , 11 �
� , :�. ,
� � ' $ ' � � � . , '
� � �
: ;,:.
� ��, � �� � ` - �:::. .:: ,,:
� :..
�._.,.__......�.. �.. �� , . ..:.... ...
� ?�a.'y i!a�1ep,Pa'rk,.'L.':-`:.
� � � � � ,
�
� �` � �
� I .
`°�`. �
,o I� �
� -. _. .
�
� __
�.. � � I � � ���..;:v:.:;��.�::�<�:.�;:��.;;.�,.
a ; � � � ��
� E �
F�i�;hJ;�i�c: �CE�Y;�=iar:ningiGiSi�,IS_prajactsiannexuti�!�:; ate: 2 8 2 1 �
vVindsto;�i;t� ar,nex�.mx�s.1 in,:ir?c!:>;enc`•1 an^cx Vit:i('tit5�_{j$L'�f.[l?X� �
° -- 3°° - � 600 � :-� `�� � � � Windstone V Annexation
Feet :,„�.,,,,
j
1:3,000 L i,
�' ' Vicinity Map
Community & Econorriic Development '-�� „�' � I
Alex Pietsch,Administrator � '`�'� �
'"'� { �.,,� � �Annexation Boundary
Adriana Abramovich, Plannin Technician II � +
CCYOfi w.... � �r � � .....�s �l.S
r �
�";} .... ,• , .... ..,,
�. � ��` k '=City Lim'
� .... ,,?:,.,;&;. � �3� �';� � Parcels
-�...�. �.,�;�,���:����� +;,�.�ti-
�,.;�.;,�,...„�.,� ?:.;
� � �
I
i
I
�
f
�
�Y �
O�
U��.
� _ 'a +
�� o� �
NT �
s
ZONING PUBLIC HEARING
Windstone V Potential Annexation Area �
lune 18, 1012 �
This approximately 4.3-acre potential annexation area is located in the City's Potential Annexation Area �
at the northeastern portion of the City limits. The northern, eastern, and southern boundaries are
coterminous with existing City limits. The northern boundary is in proximity of Northeast 16th Street (if
extended),the eastern boundary is in proximity of Mount Baker Place Northeast (if extended), and the �
southern boundary abuts Southeast Renton Issaquah Road. The western boundary is a parcel line that
lies west of Lyons Avenue Northeast. �
The area is currently designated with the King County Comprehensive Plan designation of Urban �
Residential Medium 4- 12 du/acre and is zoned with R-4 zoning, allowing four dwelling units per gross F
acre. The City of Renton Comprehensive Plan designation for the area is Residential Low Density �
(RLD). As shown on the map below, R-4 zoning, which allows four dwelling units per net acre, is
proposed for the entire proposed annexation area.
�
�
State law requires two public hearings in the matter of zoning annexation areas, the first public hearing �
for the proposed zoning of this annexation area was held on March 12, 2012. Council is holding this ;
second public hearing in order to give affected parties the opportunity to comment about the �
proposed zoning. �
�
�
«, �
. � �
. � �
f�,� . � s
,�-� �
' - �
>�_ , . i �
:�:; , �a .
;-��k = �.;� .
N , �;.�� .
� � � , . � N
� ,. � � �.. �,
� � � ��� �
- � � 4_ .�
,, " . �Y�x �� �5�' ���� F,
�
. i
�
E
� 6/18/2012 !
f
!
�
I
_- „ ��,urer��,���,����������µ��fn�,���,'"� ��-�. � :-„__�_..°; .--- _ : � � ..�� �.�Ann � �I �
��� - � -,- - -
exation Process
� _ . � , �� , _ � � i �
� ..k� I��Wi���lll� ��'$�u�u6"1WLEy �
Proposed Windstone V R
��;�
s
�. a
Annexation - ��'- � °
;
__ 4
4
- _ �
i
Zoning Public Hearing �
�F � �_ �
a�Sr. -
_ _ - ! �ii, � �Il�k�_
lune 18,2012
- �, Y:''� �Councal Adopts �
� � . ,
, � ` -„- ,-- ',i,or�lTin�M�eY' ,. d
i
�
�
_ {
�
- G�'NMr!k�9�'?,Plg'A P�ii��.t�rr�;�.W . ..-.,� . �pl�'P'�PC�"��^Vtl' ^ m m '��� ,..-,-__--„ '�ti,z,':: . ,�� 'WN44,;WNyIK{� �: _, �:-`�= j
� u�a
,,4 - �
BRB Approval Location {
;�' ��" �
•King County Boundary Review Board"Closing Letter " I ����� � <,���4 f-- �
for Completed Adion" - �,��^���� ''� � �
•Issued May 16,2012 - �;�� �
•The proposed annexation has been approved for �� _ j
� ����,
final action �,` � '° i---' ;��p�� �
•Final adion is ordinance adoption �`' �
•However,zoning annexation areas requires two � , ` -��, �� F�.= L,�q, M w;ndstone V �
publit hearings �q: x,� Annexation Area i
� u��, �
�
•This is the second of the two public hearings �'" �, �' �
•First was held April 6,2009 ��� "" a,��r ;
µ''.L�, � t �
'-' ''-i -' x,_.d�.�� �'Y`.r,�y.,
—"^".,,,..,,,. .��• .�h� �*r �' ' r .^�i+ �
�'i E N T O N "2+3a ' � x _c t � .x�s�'",'
. R.,��� �
�
1
t
�
I
Ei
f!
.., „ kAY 7 -''�`--- -``-- ,... __. ,_, 4l Q , ,ifia�upiW'9! � ,.�„r�'- __-� �r 9 ,'F�j'� �+o�`.,.� ,. „,..-,._ _-'�oe�-_ i
.���' _ '� m���i V�ua�ui',.��r _ - ',i mm�m��iP �,r, V�rui
- ^ ,a, F
Other Zonin Existinp Conditions
�i f FY FRC^uC?.E PHAPE f a b �
E�da.41L A
� ' h(—�,,f •in 1996,area was 4
�R-t Zminy t-1, - _ __
��-. - --�3, p a K o f t h e M a y m "4� •4-3 a cr es y
�R-5 Toni.g � -`'f � -_ �� � _ ,
. � Vall rezone-
� � ry��+,, ' , eY P � ; •Single family I
�`� , ,� ��I � Ordinance#4667 � . . !
�.`i "''
and vacant land �
^��-,��� •� � �r,• •Prezoned R-5 rP� ,
� � -s - 4 housing units I
�r.. '� - ���s' •City of Renton no "' '
,-� F� i/� ii �� •2.9 acres
�������� -$"""�y " -- � longer has this � vapnt land �
�,�, �- -�"�, zone �
��-�� .�
�_�___��
� ,����� ,�� ,,�i
r"'"; _�� - _ _ �� �
�-- � "" _�`7`; !
��� �' � rii �is ,_ � �
?--I � � �:� �' ' :�� l�� ---,,.,,, ��� 1
v..i� I �_ t �iENTUN 1...
1
1
1
1 �
�
�
E
� r
j > �
+ I
� 6/18/2012 '
�
�
' ,.�;-- _ ,,.- T�„ _.- ., , _ . ;,� ,r,.y ��,-, i Ir r k��d�i,.�, �u!���, , '� �"'�.�'��w�fl�TM„
� �'���.,,,P!w� ffi��.. i IN�WNI��'4� �`k�,'- Ih%il� "��i �. �'kr�'0.�,,,.<.. ��'� „ - __„ -'�.,_..�.
�,', � � �i� "��_-.,:
; __ - g p Yµ;. � u ,
,.. �,,,�.
� . . To o ra h .,, .,. Environmental �
� � �
; - t` . '�,��E,�� � },
' �� � •No regulated slopes - ' � � €
� �j" � T�'�F •Greenes Stream, �
; I �,, 'i6`""�' Class IV waterway 4
,��_.wa�
� s�a•,.�=eo�s ��'� •Along eastern �
'` �+ �,D�� boundary
� � �
j � -' _ ��"` ' ��
' � �' ' _
i �� � � �',� �;a" �
� ��.�:::�� p '`----`'_ I�' ¢
,�- r E
� f
� .
, -� `� ,
a F,�N �"���' Pc E o �� �
.....,,..�._ _ -.
;f
9
J
,g
; ^�.';:: ����,-�;�.'"�.'�"�hxi'�9i'N'I��,@IPqµ'�I u,"�E.��: �.-�-��:�'�°�h�i�I�I��,B�INVI�III�V„ �'�.Y_'._--'�'�,'�.�� __ � ,��,s��a��j�7 ���xPll�I�IYhlhl% i �'„a�;� '�.��W.,.,_'�I0. P"s1 i,:�..,
a King County Zoning � Renton Comprehensive Plan Designation �
� 9
� �'�� 7�� •R-4 Zoning � J s �u '����� �� •Residential Low �
_ �„d�-�z��' �� '` :�
t""` i � •ResideMialFour � 'p` ,�� � Density ,
- �� DwellingUnitsper `�,,. �
R-4 I ,t�' GrossAcre �"' I'� • 3possiblezones:
, i:!�.+ -,i� •Resource Conservation
-i j ,/' ; k� � (1 du/SO acres)
� - # �}'-��A; � . N � W �' •R-1(1 du/1 acre)
� �m � �
�,,. '�. � � , ��5 •R-0(4 du/lacre) s
( t k � � €
�"^`"'--��, � ,, {
; � - �+ �
.4�-,� _3.`�.,�.,
E,
,;
_ --- .— .�
��"�
T'i E N T C7 23 +rj-�:��_• �'i i:hT'N �,y�<
,m�< �
._.. � �
t
�
_ �
� .;� ��p�,���� Surroundin Renton�Zon�� � ...,�.,„,����� ,_.� ��� o�. u .. �..%;��,� .
�
- �. w; .�d,w� ?����. ,,•n p -�..., ,:_ �
. � �..,,... =-->
,l��,r
g �ng ., Pro osed Renton Zoning E
,. -_- �`��. �
� '., ��9� , �II�I�,�� : M i „ ,
��.. �, , I � - �' •It is recommended
' •Surrounding ' " the area be zoned
fi�,y�;,"� ft� Renton zoning is �
I�"� R-4andR-8 ��V� R�
� � •Allowing 4 du/acre �
� - '�
= ��-u
f
�� �� � �
w���� �= _ G _ f
',, � ,� � �
,�, ,,�,�.,� � �.
.�_:= A.
R� �� ,e �,
.�.._._...._ :� ��; n ;�?�
�
_ _��. 7'
� i
� �
Fi E
NTON ��
„�� �"iEN`1'DN- .,
�
r'"�
....,.... _,. � .............:.. � '��',:`%`
�
_ #
2 �
3
, i
i
' I
� 6/18/2012 g
,E
�
I
�
�
�
ati+i��l��:�'.�w�� , ,�E:v..^. � '.".... . . . 'i�r"�u��d�tui�c4�uuFxi��?���waru7,�fy_ti�Y��"�_�`�` ��.� �» -..���a.,,,.,�� �.��,�..��.�„��,,�i. ��c��4w�;a'��"fl����C'�Ni�Wu��iWa�ira �- -_--�-�- d
- RBCOI'Y1117@Ild8t1011 Net Density vs.Gross Density �
Net Density Gross Density �
•The Administration recommends Council:
, , g
• Approve first reading of the ordinance 4, ��- '� ,' `' �°�'� � �
effectuating the Windstone V Annexation,and �
• Approve first reading of the ordinance rezoning �
the Windstone V Annexation area to R-4, _ �
consistent with the Residential Low Density
designation. �
� � T - - ` - - -'� �
Realized density=3 d.u. ftealized density=4 d.u. �, ,
� s � �'�Y REN'TQN ��,�,t� �
_ i
- �
E
�
�
�
€t
d
�
!
�
�
�
�
;y
@
s
i
�
k
�
z
�
�
�
k
i
�
t
t
€g
Y
t{
. B
�
F
C
A
k
_ ;
�(
4
�
4
�
�
�
�
�
3
�
�
�
o� z
Fie/d P�� �� �
F F �
a�
Y
C6
m
Z N 7t t � z
a
a � w
� a� �
w C Y
Z �} � � �
.. ��w�k:�� J � `J L
>� .._.. iw C +-.
� .., .. .__ ... _._. ..._. .... �
Q �
O � r-
U
fB
7 �
F
' y• w
� �
Q �
{�--� �
F �
�
�
N
�V a >
� L
���`a� May G'alley Park
,# �gS - �':�''y4
'(�'�O� �,. .�. .Y,
�f.�e � r�-.a
,r
♦
iw �, . ...� �y 3- {y ..
e �cj '�'°' :- - ,, `�
.. � . ,t, __
, ��_ �..- .��. .. ..
� e , - `
Path:H:iCEDiP/anninglGlSIGIS_projectslannexatronslWindstoneV annexlMxdsl3-1_WindstoneV renton_zoning_b&w.mxd
Date:06/20/2012 =�� �� �..'..�. e�"�. W i n d sto ne V A n n exati o n
�
0 2so soo � '� p
Feet � R-4 Zoning
1:3,000 N
Community & Economic Development ciry �imits � Parcels
, ---��
C.E."Chip"Vincent Adriana Abramovich ��. �___ � Annexation Boundary n Parks
Administrotor GIS Analyst
ciryof.�
� �x�� R-4 Zoning
��/ � (' �'`�� .
�J,�.+�;:�;.�f�� l��`. ..�,
E
. �
- k
�
I' ' � � ,
- Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
Yesler Building, Room 240, 400 Yesler Wa�, Seattle, WA 98104
Plione: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (206) 296-6803 • lzttp//wwu�.kingcounh�.gov/annexat-ions
City of Renton
May 17, 2012 Pianning Division
MAY 18 1011
City of Renton �����v�D
Attn: Angie Mathias, Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
RE: CLOSING LETTER FOR COMPLETED ACTION—File No. 2338—City of Renton—
Windstone V Annexation
Dear Ms. Mathias
We are writing to advise you that the Boundary Review Board has now completed the required
Evaluation, as specified in RCW 36.93, for the above-referenced proposed action filed with the
Board effective: Apri12,2012.
The Boundary Review Board also provided a 45-day public review period April 2—Mav 16,2012,
as prescribed by RCW 36.93. The Board received no request for a public hearing of this proposed
action during the public review period.
The Boundary Review Board, therefare, hereby deems this proposed action approved effective:
Mav 17,2012. Final approval of the proposed action is also subject to the following actions,where
applicable:
1. Sewer and Water District actions and some other actions are also subject to approval by the �
Metropolitan King CounTy Council. If the Council makes changes to the proposal, the Board �
may then be required to hold a public hearing.
2. Filing with King County of franchise application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of
this letter.
3. Filing with King County of permit application(s), as required, accompanied by a copy of this
letter.
4. Fulfiliment of all other statutory requirements and/or procedures specified in your Notice of
Intention.
€
; * �. �
� � �
�
Pa e two continued Ma 17 2012 �
g ' y ' �
Form 13
�
�
5. Notification in writing of your intended effective date of annexation. This notification should
be provided as early as possible. Please send this information to Karen Wolf, Chinook Building,
King County Office of Performance, Strategy and Budget (OPSB), 401 Fifth Avenue, Suite
810, Seattle, Washington 98104, and
6. Filing with King County Council o£ (1)one certified copy of final resolution or ordinance
accomplishing this proposed action; and(2) a copy of this letter. This document should be filed
with the Clerk of the Council (Attn: Anne Noris), King County Courthouse, Room 1025, �
Seattle,Washington 98104 �
�
If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact our office at 206-296- �
6800. �
�
t
Sincerely, �
€
�
�
�
�
�
Lenora Blauman �
Executive Secretary �
�
�
cc: Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council �
Mike Reed, Council Administration
Dave Wilson, Elections Division
Tom Brown,Department of Assessment
Lydia Reynolds-Jones,Manager, Project Support Services
King County"911" Program
Paul Reitenbach, Department of Development&Environmental Services �
Karen Wo1f, Office of Performance, Strategic and Budget(OPSB) �
Connie Wong,Facilities Management Division,Real Estate Section
Anne Lockmiller,Facilities Management Division,Real Estate Section
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
9f
4
�
�i
�
f
�
�
�� � P � �-� �
c.. .�% ��-
. �iTY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BI � - _Q r, � �
� [�`�.
Ai#: �
Submitting Data: For Agenda of: �
Dept/Div/Board.. CED/Long Range Planning June 4, 2012 �
Staff Contact...... Angie Mathias x.6576 Agenda Status �
Consent.............. X �
Subject: Public Hearing.. X
Windstone V Annexation Correspondence.. �
Ordinance............. �
€
Resolution............ ?
;
Old Business........ �
4
Exhibits: New Business....... �
King County Boundary Review Board Closing Letter Study Sessions...... �
Map Information......... �
�
Draft Ordinances �
Recommended Action: Approvals: �
Council concur Legal Dept......... X �
Finance Dept...... �
Other............... �
�
�
Fiscal Impact: �
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... �
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... �
Tota) Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project.. �
i
f
@
SUMMARY OF ACTION: �
On March 12, 2012, City Council held a public hearing in the matter of the proposed Windstone V
Annexation. Following that public hearing, Council accepted the 60% petition and authorized the
Administration ta forward a Notice of Intent to the King County Boundary Review Board (BRB). On
May 16, 2012, the BRB issued a Closing Letter for Completed Action indicating its approval of the �
annexation. The next step in the annexation of this area is for Council to hold a second public �
hearing in the matter of zoning. Following that public hearing, the Council may adopt the ordinance �
annexing the Windstone V area and the ordinance establishing zoning. City departments conducted
a review of the annexation proposal and all departments indicated that the annexation represents a �
logical extension of their services and raised no concerns.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: �
Council set lune 18, 2012, for a public hearing to hold the second public he �rin� �n th�matter of
zoning the Windstone V annexation area�e, to adopt the ordinances "� `� g annexation.. g
�
a�. �
�
�
i
�
i
�
�
€
�
B
- � �
� � x
r
�
k
i
�
Road Services Division �
Department of Transportatfon �
KSGTR-0231 {
201 South]ackson Street �
Seattie,WA 98104-3856 �
�
May 3,2012 �
}
t
Lenora Blauman �
Executive Secretary �
Boundary Review Board
YES-BR-0240 }
i
RE: Citv of Renton— Windstone V Area Annexation BRB File No. 2338) �
Dear Ms. Blauman:
�
z
Thank you for the opportunity to review the legal description for the proposed Windstone V
Area Annexation. €
�
Staff reviewed the enclosed legal description and found it satisfactory and complete.
�
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- �
Our review findings are as follows: �
The proposed annexation boundary is within the Urban Growth Boundary Line(UGBL). �
�
�
When reviewing legal descriptions for annexations, staff attempts to identify islands of �
unincorporated County that may have been overlooked by the City in developing the legal ;
�
description.
�
There is an error in the legal description. It reads: "The East half of the Southeast �
quarter of Section 2". It should read: "The East half of the Southeast quarter of �
Section 3".The Windstone V portion being annexed is within Section 3,Township 23 y
North,Range 5 East and not in Section 2,Township 23 North, Range 5 East.
�
�
Additionally,staff attempts to identify islands of unincorporated road rights-of-way that �
may have been overlooked by the City in developing the legal description. The submitted �
legal description does not exclude any adjacent portions of annexable rights-of-way that are s
p
currently maintained by King County. �
�
k
There are no King County-maintained bridges within the proposed annexation boundary. �
F
There are no King County parks within the proposed annexation boundary. �
€
>
r
There are no Road Services Division's mitigation sites within the proposed annexation �
�
boundary. `
�
r
F
�;.,g,��, �
C
�
�
i
€
�
�
� � �
. �
. Lenora Blauman �
May 3,2012 �
Page 2 �
�
>
There are no King County-maintained off-road stormwater facilities within the annexation �
boundary.
. �
There are no new streets within the proposed annexation boundary that remain under �
maintenance-defect bonds with King County,as currently posted by the developer for the
required two-year maintenance-defect period.
�
There are no Road Improvement Districts(RID)within the proposed annexation boundary. �
�
x
There are no tax lots within the proposed annexation boundary that are parcels of land �
owned by King County Roads,as identified from County GIS data. �
There are no tax lots within the proposed annexation boundary that are parcels of land �
owned by other King County departments,as identified from County GIS data. �
There are no tax lots within the proposed annexation boundary that will be segregated by �
the submitted boundary. �
�
There are no gaps or overlaps created by the proposed annexation boundary. �
k!g
Po
If you have any questions,please contact Trevor Cray, Supervisor, Survey Unit at �
206-205-9910,or via e-mail at trevor.cray@kingcounty.gov. �
�
Sincerely, �
�
��= �
dia Reynol Jones °
Project Support Services Manager �
Traffic and Engineering Services Section k
,
s
LRJ:TR:mr �
r
Enclosures �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
$
€
�
�
3
�
�
, a
�
I
I
�
�
�
�
, j
I
4
�
�
�
. � � �'
Lenora Blauman �
May 3, 2012
Page 3 �
�
cc: Anne Noris,Clerk of the King County Council(w/enclosures) �
Paulette Norman,P.E., County Road Engineer,Road Services Division(RSD), �
Department of Transportation(DOT) �
Richard A. Brater, P.E.,Manager,Traffic and Engineering Services Section, ;
(TESS), RSD, DOT �
Karen Wolf, Division Manager,Strategic Planning and Policy, Office of �
Performance, Strategy and Budget �
Karen Freeman, Senior Policy Analyst, Strategic Planning and Policy,Office of
Performance, Strategy and Budget �
Tom Brown, Business and Finance Officer, Department of Assessments `
Sharon Claussen, Project Manager, Department of Natural Resources and Parks
Robert Nunnenkamp,Property Agent,Department of Natural Resources and Parks �
LeAnn Merrill, Programmer Analyst II,Department of Natural Resources and Parks j
, Dave Hancock, Engineer,Water and Land Resources Division, Department of �
Natural Resources and Parks ,
Daisy Tamayo,GIS Specialist,Department of Assessments �
Paul McCombs, GIS Specialist, Department of Development and Environmental �
Services '
� Jim Markus, Supervising Engineer,TESS,RSD,DOT
Trevor Cray, Engineer IV,TESS,RSD,DOT
Jake Evans, Engineer III,TESS,RSD, DOT
Suchatri Yesuwan, Engineer II, Budget and Technology Section,RSD,DOT �
Brandy Rettig, Senior Engineer,Road Maintenance and Operations Section, RSD, �
DOT g
Rey Sugui,Program Analyst,Road Services Administration, RSD,DOT �
Jake Jacobovitch, Engineer II,TESS, RSD, DOT �
Nicole Keller,Engineer II,TESS,RSD,DOT �
Cindy Torkelson, Engineer I,TESS, RSD,DOT �
�
r
�
;
�
�
E
(
�
8
d
�
I
a
!
�
i
�
I
_ �
i
�
�
�
. j
�
I
�
I
�
�
�
� � �
�
. �
s Lenora Blauman ;
May 3,2012 �
Page 4 �
�
�
�
bcc: Rick Bautista,Legislative Analyst, Growth Management and Natural Resources g
Committee �
�
�
�
k
t
b
�
�
�
�
�
F
P
k
P
�
, �
t
�
�(
I
R
i
�
i
�
�
8y
f{
i
�
i
�
�
�
�
II
�
II
ll
I
b
�
� � ¢
� �
�
�lashington 5tate Boundary Review Boar�' `
M 4:
G
�'or King Count� �
Yester Burlding, Roorn 240, 400 Yesler Way, Seattie, WA 98104 �
Phor�e: {206)29b-6�n0 • Faz: {2ab)295-6803 • fittp:/huurul.kingc�unty.gau/annexah'ons �
�
April ?.2U1? �
4
/y �
f�}, �)
) .�y , `, < //}
f;`� r d''f�,• �!'� f
"I'O: Ms. Lydia Rcynolds-.loncs -.�, P �}�
,,,, �
Dcparlmcnt of Transporlation ,�,r:',,,. F ��;,,;;
Manager, Project Support Scrviccs ``'�;�;'i-�;,t g
KSC'-TR-0231 l -� �
�
rROM: Lenora Blauman, Executive Sccretaiy �
�
SUBJEC"I': l�ile No. 2338—City of Renton— Windstone V Area Annexation �
Enclosed plcase find the legal description a�Zd related Assessors map(s) submitted to our office as �
part oF the above-referenced Notice of Intention. We would appreciate your reviewing the legal ,
description and reporting your findings and recommendations back to our office. �
�
The copy of the enclosed legal description is for your use and files. It would facilitate processing of �
revisions to the legal description, however, if you would return a copy of the legal, with any
notations you choose to rnake, along with your report. We would appreciate your response within
the 45-day waiting period, which is expected to end Mav 17, 2012. The deadline for requestang ;
that the Board invoke jurisdiction and hold a public hearing can only be changed by a revision to �
the legal description or modification of the original Notice of Intention. �
y
a
a
The support and expert assistance which you and your stafF provide on legal descriptions is ¢
essential to Board processing of proposed actions. Please let us know if we need to provide you
with any further data. ;
?
ce: Nicole Kelter, En�ineer II,Road Services Division,(w/o enclosures) I
I
I,
R.S.V.P. Mav 3.2012 '
FORM S I'
��
, �
k
«�+r.�.ru �s� A
' M �
. E
. «....�.. ; E
�
� � W � NE 17th St � �
Z W � ?
Z ; �
a �
� a � i
_.__.._._w, ` �
o `"`"� � 1 �
>, � .
—� �.muq ■
� """ [X1 ...... _. ... � �
. «�.,-...-_..
i ,� ...�. ,
NE 16th St � �
..-.v+.--o.... ::3Jt��-r'«'i.i.w.ss ♦ O +...�w.r,w.-�. � P
� •W'.'�f.'Te4'•...� ■
�f�
@
�p
F,
�
.��n...w w..� A
.�
�
1
' � �@p
.mur�.r�"w�.. �
, j
�
�rrw"+�w�..� . �
P
�
�
W � �
CJ)
a` . �ar�a a �
� .
� aQ s e
�- 5 •.'
�0�`S � ,�`�. �
r� `'a S. �
t�Le� :�'�^'u
�� ��Y E
=��_.;. �
�`��re` ��'� s
�� ,. �'=��' $
. -��;�
..�...,. �- a '
c �
��� i
��, ,.,��r .n�j�'?� K« �
•.� }�.X�y4
. '- -��7�� p
"" � �� p
�
��! NE 13th St �
€
e
e
,
i
Fte Neme:\CE D1PlarmtRglG�S{GI$yroJedslennexatioru\
' WirdsfoneV annextmxdslbiblFl.porposed ennexatfon boundary.mxd �
„n �
Date:3/14/2012 -����:�'��' Windstone V Annexation �
D 115 �Feet �
/� Proposed Annexation Boundary �
1:2,400 � \ ��
!�
Community&.Economic Development N �*~•� +,� � l��;Annexation Boundary
NexPletseh,Administrator �:;�City Limits k
Addana A6ramovfch,GtSMalyst �� �Q [�Parcels �
�
- �`"�y���,�'��,���,��� FILE . • 2338 ITY OF RE�TTQN - WINDSTONE V AREA ANNEXA ION i
I
`s
�
� i
. !
` Exhibit C 1
i
a
P
P
I,
WINDSTONE V ANNEXATION i
LEGAL DESCRIPTION �
P
a
The East half of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 2,Township 23 ;
North, Range S East,W.M.,in King County,Washington except those portions annexed to the �
City of Renton by Ordinance Nos.5068&5293. �
�
�
�
�
a
�
�
e
. F
,
. �
i
�
t
�
}
. �
FILE N0. 2338 — CITY OF RENTON — WINDSTQNE V AREA ANNEXATION �
�
�
. �
E
F
. �
S.
� ' �
�
�
k
. 1
. �
. �
. �
�'
Y
. �
Y
4
�,
�
�
3
. �
. �:
A
Page 1 of 1 (0344) �
G
�
d
�
�
�
�
�
�
i
i
a �' � i
`
- Washington State Boundary Review Board
�� For King County
Yesler Building, Room 240, 400 Yesler Way, Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (206) 296-6803 • http//www.kingcounty.gov/annexations
City of Renton
April 3, 2012
Planning Division
APR 0 4 2011
City of Renton ��������
Attn: Angie Mathias
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way �
Renton, WA 98057
RE: SUMMARY
File No. 2338 —City of Renton—Windstone V Area Annexation
Dear Ms. Mathias:
Enclosed is the Summary prepared by Boundary Review Board staff for the above-referenced
Notice of Intention. The Suminary will be sent to the Boundary Review Board members, along
with the Notice of Intention, as part of the agenda packet for the next regular monthly Board
meeting.
If you see any corrections or clarifications which should be made in the Suinmary, I would
appreciate hearing from you at(206)296-6801.
Sincerely,
Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Enclosure: Suminary
FORM 11
,� 1
I
� � i
,° ,�, A �
�
�
SUMMARY �
�
q
FILE NO. 2338 Thomas Guide Map No: 626 �
�
Date Received: 04/02/12 f
�
�
Date Distributed: 04/02/12 �
ENTITY City of Renton �
Date Filed: F
ACTION Resolution for Petition for Land Annexation �
Expiration 45 Days: 054_2/12 �
TITLE Windstone V Area Annexation
Board Meeting: 04/12/12 �
�
�
c
Location The Windstone V Annexation site is located on the eastern side of the �
Cit�r of Renton. The northernmost boundary of the site is formed by NE �
16t Street (if extended.). The southern boundary of the site is formed by
SE Renton-Issaquah Road. The easternmost boundary is formed by ;
property lines and is primarily located in the vicinity of 147th Place SE (if �
extended.) The westernmost boundary is formed by property lines and s �
generally located near to Lyons Place SE (if extended.). �
Land Area Approximately 4.39 acres (5 parcels) �
F
Land Use: Present: Single-family homes(four dwelling units); vacant land �
Estimated Future Use: Single-family homes (8 new dwelling units);
vacantland '
�
s
�
Population Present: Approximately 11 people �
�
Estimated Future:Approximately 32 people �
�
�
Assessed Valuation: $1,059,000 �
�
County Comprehensive `
Plan Designation Residential Use—Medium Density g
r.
�
County Zoning Single-Family Use at approximately 4- 12 units per gross acre �
�
City Comprehensive Plan Proqosed: Residential Single-Family Use �
City Zoning Proposed: Single-Family Use(approximately four units per net acre) �
6
District Comprehensive Plan Not applicable �
�
�
District Franchise Not applicable �
i
�
Urban Growth Area(UGA) The Windstone V Area is located within the Urban Growth Area as �
identified under the State Growth Management Act, King County �
Comprehensive Plan and City of Renton Comprehensive Plan.
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
1 �
�
� �
� �.
; , .. 1
� �,�
:�
;
' SEPA Declaration The Windstone V Area was addressed in an Environmental Impact
Statement prepared for the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan. The
proposed Windstone V Area Annexation is exempt from SEPA pursuant
to RCW 43.21 C.222
�
�
ENTITIES/AGENCIES NOTIFIED:
_ King County Council Member(s)Julia Patterson; Reagan Dunn
:� King County: Clerk of Council, Department of Natural Resources (DNR); Department of
� Development and Environmental Services (DDES), Department of Assessments,
Department of Transportation (DOT), .State Department of Ecology (DOE}, King
County "911" Program, Office of Management and Budget, Deputy Prosecuting �
� Attorneys' Office, King County Records and Election Division, Fire Marshal �
= Division, Historic Preservation Program, Puget Sound Regional Council,
_� Community and Human Services, Public Health Department `
,
� Cities: Not applicable
; Fire Di�tricts: Eastside Fire & Rescue (No. 10); King County Fire Protection District No. 40;
Renton Fire and Emergency Services
�
� Water Districts: King County Water District No. 90; City of Renton Public Utilities Department
; Sewer Districts: City of Renton Public Utilities Department
Sch�ol District: Issaquah School District No. 411
� �
�p
` 4
�
k
�
;
�
3
� i
�
,
�
�
+ i
�
;i �
I
I
�
�
I
_ �
I
�
�
�
1
_ j
�
,
�
I
I
2 �
_ 1
. �
�
b � �1 � � �
�..�, a , E
M
k
�
SUMMARY—File No. 2338 �
P
�'
The City of Renton proposes the addition of approximately 4.39 acres, known as the Windstone V °
Annexation. Renton City Council adopted this annexation proposal in March of 2012.. The action is �
proposed under RCW 35A.14 via a 60% petition method of annexation. �
The City of Renton is seeking a Waiver from the Boundary Review Board for the Windstone V Area �
Annexation pursuant to RCW 35A.14.220 based upon the fact that the Windstone V Area property is less
than 10 acres in size and less than $2 million in value. �
i
c
The City of Renton is seeking annexation in order to more efficiently govern and serve the Area. The �
proposed annexation is also in keeping with interests by citizens in joining the City in order to participate �
in local government, to administer land uses under City of Renton regulations, and to receive essential �
public services from Renton.
, �
The Windstone V Annexation site is located on the eastern side of the City of Renton. The northernmost �
boundary of the site is formed by NE 16th Street (if extended.). The southern boundary of the site is '
formed by SE Renton-Issaquah Road. The easternmost boundary is formed by property lines and is �
primarily located in the vicinity of 147th Place SE (if extended.) The westernmost boundary is formed by �
property lines and s generally located near to Lyons Place SE (if extended.).
�
The City of Renton reports that the proposed Windstone V Annexation conforms to the State Growth �
Management Act (RCW 36.70A.) For example, the annexation is supported by RCW 36.70.20, which �
requires community planning goals, for urban growth, services and infrastructure, and environmental
preservation. Additionally, annexation reportedly is consistent with RCW 36.70A.020 (1), encouraging
development in urban areas where there are adequate public services. It is also consistent with �
RCW 36.70A.020 (12), calling for public services to support permitted development. q
6
The unincorporated Windstone V Area is included in the "Land Use Element" of the City of Renton $
Comprehensive Plan. The Windstone V unincorporated area is identified in the "Annexation Element" of ;
the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and is located within the Renton Potential Annexation Area. The `
!
proposed action is consistent with City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policies addressing annexation,
including those provisions which call for inclusion of urban areas and provision of services e.g., LU-I; LU-
37.1; LU 37.5; LU-36; LU-41 and LU-42.) '
�
The proposal is reportedly also consistent with King County Comprehensive Plan/Countywide Planning
, Policies for annexation. For example, the Windstone V Annexation is reported to address King County
policies that call for contiguous orderly growth of local jurisdictions and for local services to urban areas
(e.g., Comprehensive Plan: U-304, U-208, U-301, U-304.). The King County Countywide Planning
Policies also establish cities as the appropriate providers of local governance and urban services (e.g.,
FW-13, CO-1, CO-3; LU-31, LU-32, LU-33). �
The City of Renton reports that the proposed Windstone V annexation is consistent with the provisions of
RCW 36.93 (Boundary Review Board Regulations). More specifically, RCW 36.93.180 requires that �
annexations be evaluated with respect to nine objectives. In this application, the City of Renton has
stated that several key objectives have been identified as being potentially relevant for specific �
consideration. �
�
For example, City of Renton officials report that Windstone V annexation would be consistent with �
Objective 1, which calls for the preservation of neighborhoods as this area is linked to Renton by �
natural/built geographic features (e.g., municipal boundaries, access routes, topography) and by social �
fabric(e.g., similar land uses, shared commercial centers, community gathering areas.) �
�
This annexation would also reportedly be consistent with Objective 2 which calls for the use of physical �
boundaries. The City of Renton borders the site at its northern, eastern and southern boundaries. The �
western boundary of the site is bordered by property boundaries located in Unincorporated King County.
These unincorporated properties are all located within the City of Renton's Potential Annexation Area. �
�
�
E
3 �
t
4
�
� �
�
s
�
� `�
: <
� z
` ,�%
� Further, the annexation would be consistent with Objective 3, which cails for creation of logical service
� areas, and Objective 4 through Objective 7, which cail for the achievement of reasonable boundaries for a �
° jurisdiction. The City is seeking annexation in order to provide practical and regular boundaries so that ail
� services and land use regulations affecting this area may be efficiently coordinated by a single local
; government unit to the benefit of the community.
' Similarly, the City reports that this annexation would be consistent with Objective 8, which calls for
' inclusion of urban areas within municipalities. The Windstone V Area has been established for
� annexation through the Renton Comprehensive Plan. This action is supported as well by the State
� Growth Management Act and the King County Comprehensive Plan.
� The Windstone V Area is developed with four single-family residences. Available vacant land is
; estimated to develop within the next 10 years to add approximately eight new dwelling units. Both for
� developed and developing properties in the Windstone V Area, the City of Renton is prepared to provide
� general administrative services, review of development, and environmental protection (including
� evaluation and regulation of environmentally sensitive areas, storm water/flood management.)
.3
The City of Renton will directly provide police service to the Windstone V Area. The City will provide fire
� service and emergency medical services to the Windstone V Area properties via Renton Fire and
;
� Emergency Services. The City of Renton Police Department will protect the community.
� The City of Renton will provide the Windstone V properties with utility services either directly or by
� contractual agreement with service providers. For example, King County Water District No. 90 currently
provides water services to the Windstone V Area properties and will continue to do so for both existing 6
_ and new development. �
With annexation, the City will also provide sewer services to the Windstone V Area. Stormwater `
� management will be provided in a manner that is consistent with the City of Renton Stormwater Manual, �
� King County standards and applicable State of Washington guidelines.
'° i
Windstone V Area residents will have access to Renton libraries, parks, and recreation facilities. Law and ;
justice services and human services would, similarly, be provided to the citizens of the Windstone V Area.
x Students would continue to be served by the Issaquah School District.
�
City of Renton officials have conducted fiscal studies for the Windstone V Area to estimate revenues and ,
expenditures both at the time of annexation and ten years into the future. It is reported that the I
a Windstone V Area Annexation, at existing levels of development, will generate expenditures of $3,843. ;
� and revenue at $5,034.00. At the 10-year point, the Windstone V Area is anticipated to generate
expenditures of $15,107. and revenue at $16,881.00. Thus, at annexation the City would recognize an i
annual revenue gain of $1,191.00. At 2022, with anticipated new development, the City estimates �
� annual revenues would exceed expenditures by approximately$1,774. '
" The City is prepared to govern and serve the VVindstone V Area at annexation and into future years.
} Windstone V Area property owners will assume their share of the regular taxes/fees(e.g., property taxes) �,
� and special levy rates of the City. With those revenues, and other revenues available to the jurisdiction, �
� City officials report that there are sufficient funds to undertake the costs for governance and service to the I
Windstone V Area in a manner equivalent to levels of service provided to citizens of the existing City of �
' Renton. !,
� I
The City looks forward to serving the citizens of the Windstone V Area. �
_ ,
i
�
' ' I�
I
�
�
;: ,
� I
- ;
= 4 ',
°z
� '
March 28, 2012 I
State of Washington '
, j
Boundary Review Board for King County �
Yesler Building, Room 240 a
400 Yesler Way �
Seattle,WA 98104 `
E
�
Subject: NOTICE OF INTENTION TO EXPAND THE CITY OF RENTON CORPORATE LIMITS BY �
ANNEXATION AND REQUEST TO WAIVE REVIEW �
�
Dear Board Members: �
As required by Chapter 36.93 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW),the City of Renton hereby gives `
F
notice of intention to annex territory hereafter referred to as the "Windstone V Annexation." This ;
annexation is proposed under the 60% Direct Petition method in accordance with the applicable �
provisions of Chapter 35A.14 of the RCW. p
Additionally, under RCW 35A.14.220,the City is requesting that formal review by the Boundary Reivew �
Board be waived. The stated RCW allows that annexations of area that are less than 50 acres or less K
s
than $2 million in assessed valuation, are excepted from mandatory Boundary Review Board review. �
The Windstone V Annexation area is very small with 4.3-acres of territory that is estimated to have an �
assessed value of$1,059,000. �
To assist in your consideration of the proposed action and request, the required articles and exhibits are �
enclosed and numbered in accordance with the Board's suggested format. The $50.00 filing fee will be �
mailed on Monday April 2, 2012. Should questions arise during the review of the information and �
exhibits provided with this Notice of Intention to Annex, please feel free to contact Angie Mathias,
Senior Planner, at 425.430.6576. �
Please send notices and other communications regarding the proposed annexation to: �
Angie Mathias,Senior Planner �
Department of Community& Economic Development �
4
City of Renton �
1055 S. Grady Way �
Renton,WA 98057
Thank you for your consideration. �
�
Sincerely, �
E
�
�
�
�
Denis Law �
Mayor �
�
�
,
Enclosures �
�
�
¢
�
b
_ -�
I
= r � � Pr-iva#e-Rd
( � 1 �
w w j � i
Hoq ;am � # I ��� i ,,,
1 i �
� ,€�t i �c
�"1� � � j o �
„
,,
':.�;
,a:�,
>;�
aa
�,;�
w
�
a�
¢' �
L,
�,
v � �
�
� � �
\ �
� �
� �'� Mnt�t�alley Park
,g
� ' }
;; __._._ ,
r,e, �
j � i
A �� �� �r� i �_
L
S� ...... '.
� t � I
Q �
File Name: :\CED\Planning\GISlG15_projects\annexationsl ate:
WindstoneV_annex\mxds\1 Vl'indstaneV_annex_vicinity.mxd
° 3°° 6°° �� e �� � � Windstone VAnnexation
Feet ,.,„�,
1:3,000 N
��° � Vicinity Map
Community & Economic Development
Alex Pietsch,Administrator �•� QAnnexation Boundary
Adriana Abramovich, Planning Technician II r_..�
" � ��..�City Limits
City of � „ „
"� � � ��� r`�� "°�' � � Parcels
t' ���� �,��
�
E
;; � �
;
� t�`,,%'-v
;:
- �: . �\ - ��� _ _ �l,� - � - -- -- -
z �
-t ��- _ -- -- - - - - _
.
; �
; � �
' p ti(�. - - -i � - � _ - -- - _ _ - - -- -- - --
,
�
- - :, r i � �M/,� - - // � 2' ,�.� � -.
" �/► Q�►�- -0lA il /� ^
- -- - - > - --- y...� �� - _.. - - - - - --
U .
. '
- -
` -- �-�: ( '� �i1r1f GZJ�'� 11`�... C-r l � -�.��/Y�-�-�5' - -- --
r
�.�t, re�- �S �'��� _- - -- - --
- - - �� ---- - - --- - - - _ -
� c�'r¢. 5u�r�u���,;r�
' ���01�� � �
�
-- -- ;� - .. .--- - - �V`�C�►- �S �.�1U i�t-c� - -
;
;;
;
:�
- - --t- - ------ --- ------ ---- - - ---- - - -- --- - -_ _ - - - ----- - ----- - --
,;
---- -- --- --�� -- --- _- - - -.._ _ - --- - - - - -- -- - -- - __ ---------- - - --- ---- - --- - --- --- -----_-
�
----- - --- -- ---:r -- - -- _ __--- _ __ _ -_ - -- --- ---- _ _ - - - -- _ ._. _--- - - --- -..._ - - -- - -...._ - ----
�
�
- -- _ - - - -� - --- - ._. .._ _ _ __ -- - __ __ .._ __- - - ----- - --_ ___- --- -- - -- --- - -- ------- __
,
j
>- -- -- - -- - - - - _ - ---- _-------------- -- -_._ -- ----___ _ - -_ _- -- - - -
---- ---- - - _, - -- --- ---- - ---- - --- --__..----- - _--- --- _----- -- - - -
;
�
,
_ - - :� - - - - - - - _----- - _ - -- - _ _ ___ ---_ - - - --- - - _ _ - -.. ;
E
f
'f i
j!
� CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BIL�„i
AI#:
Submitting Data: For Agenda of:�^
Dept/Div/Board.. CED/Long Range Planning l�(� 2�r 2d l'�-
Staff Contact...... Angie Mathias x6576 Agenda Status
Consent.............. X
Subject: Public Hearing.. X
Windstone V Annexation—Acceptance of 60% Direct Correspondence..
Petition Ordinance.............
Resolution............
Old Business........
Exhibits: New Business.......
Issue Paper Study Sessions......
60%Direct Petition Information.........
King County Certificate
Recommended Action: Approvals: �
Council concur to set public hearing. Legal Dept......... X �
i
Finance Dept...... i
Other. . I
f
Fiscal Impact: �
6
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... �
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... �
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project.. �
�
�
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
�
The Council received a 60% Direct Petition to Annex on lanuary 25, 2012,to annex approximately 4.3-acres �
of unincorporated King County located within Renton's Potential Annexation Area. The proponent's �
petition has been certified by King County as having signatures representing at least 60%of the area's �
taxable valuation. The area is bounded to the north by Renton City limits,to the east by Renton City limits, k
to the south by Sunset Boulevard (Southeast Renton Issaquah Road),and to the west by a parcel line that is �
in the proximity of 147th Avenue Southeast, if extended. ;
i
Under State law,the Council is required to hold a public hearing to consider the annexation petition and the �
zoning in order to provide interested parties the opportunity to speak. Following the public hearing, Council �
may approve the annexation of all or any portion of the area proposed for annexation. The site is 6
designated Residential Low Density(RLD) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, but has not been �
prezoned. The public hearing will also consider the proposed zoning of R-4 (allowing four dwelling units per
net acre). �
The Administration is also seeking authorization to forward the Notice of Intent Package to the Boundary �
Review Board if Council decides to accept the 60% Direct Petition. ;
>
k
�,
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: �
Council set , for a public hearing to consider the 60% Direct Petition and the proposed �
zoning for the Winds one V Annexation and to authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of
Intent package to t Boundary Review Board for King County.
,
�
��h 12, z`�2 �
�
F
fq
P
* �
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY D �lirof,��� /,�`\!' f
& ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT �L
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: February 27, 2012 ,
T0: Rich Zwicker, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council �
VIA: Denis Law, Mayor '
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator x6592 ���
i
�
STAFF CONTACT: Angie Mathias, Senior Planner x6576 �
�
SUBJECT: Windstone V Annexation -Acceptance of 60% Direct ;
Petition to Annex �
�
�.
k
ISSUES: j
P.
�
Should the City Council accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex from the Windstone V �
Annexation Area now that the petition has been certified by the King County F
Department of Assessments? �
If the City Council accepts the 60% Direct Petition, should the Administration be directed �
F
to forward the Notice of Intent package for this annexation to the Boundary Review �
Board? �
b
�
RECOMMENDATION: �
• Council accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex the approximately 4.3- �
�
acre Windstone V Annexation site; �
• Council authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent for ;
the Windstone V Annexation to the Boundary Review Board for King �
County for their review. �
r
BACKGROUND SUMMARY: �
i
At its January 23, 2012 public meeting, Council accepted the 10% Notice of Intent to �
Commence Annexation petition and authorized the circulation of a 60% Direct Petition k.
to Annex. City of Renton departments reviewed the annexation proposal and all staff �
reported that the annexation represents a logical extension of their respective services �
and systems. There were no issues identified that would impede the annexation. A
more detailed discussion of this proposed annexation and review comments are
contained in the Department's January 9, 2012, Windstone V Annexation 10% Notice of ;
Intent issue paper. �
On January 25, 2012, the petitioner submitted the 60% Direct Petition to Annex. That �
petition was certified as sufficient, with signatures of property owners representing at �
least 60% of the taxable value of the annexation area, by King County on January 31, �
2012. �
3
�
�i
f
F
� Rich Zwicker,Council Presid� `
Page 2 of 2 � �
y February 27,2012
ZOnin�
This area has not been pre-zoned and therefore needs to be zoned with City of Renton
zoning prior to annexing. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the
annexation area is Residential Low Density (RLD). There are three zones that implement
this designation: RC - Resource Conservation (one dwelling unit per 10 net acres), R-1 -
Residential One Dwelling Unit (one dwelling unit per net acre), and R-4 - Residential
Four Dwelling Units (four dwelling units per net acre). Staff recommends zoning the
area with R-4 zoning. I
I
The City's Comprehensive Plan policies (LU 151 and LU-153) call for (and within the RLD j
designation to be zoned R-4 where there are not significant environmental constraints. ;
Land that has significant environmental constraints is identified as land where: �
• a significant percentage of the gross area is critical areas, �
• developable areas are separated by pervasive critical areas, $
• sensitive areas are located where if developed development would be non- �
contiguous, or �
�
• variances or modifications would be required to develop at the allowed density �
on the land remaining after application of the required buffers. �
None of these conditions apply to the area being considered in this zoning �
recommendation. Greene/s Stream, a Class IV waterway is located along the eastern �
boundary of the area, which is coterminous with a parcel line. The stream does not �
encumber a significant percentage of the site. It does not separate developable areas �
and is not located so as to result in non-contiguous development because of the streams ;
location along a parcel line or properties owned by different parties. Also, the stream �
and its associated buffers are not significant enough to require variances or �
modifications to develop at an R-4 density on the remaining land. �
Revised Fiscal Analvsis �
�
At the direction of Council, Staff has been using a revised fiscal analysis. This fiscal �
analysis uses methodology and assumptions that try to more accurately reflect the �
financial impacts an annexation may have upon the City. One of the principal changes �
made is to evaluate departmental costs based on what "drives" that cost. For example, �
the cost of an annexation area to the City for police service is driven by calls for service. �
Costs for street maintenance are driven by the lane miles within the area. There are �
also now more City divisions included in the cost analysis. For example, costs to provide
human services, special events and neighborhoods, as well as parks planning and �
natural resources have been added. The costs estimates are based on the 2011 budget �
and the official 2010 Census population figure (90,927). An effort was made to not �
include costs associated with staffing positions unlikely to be impacted by small `
incremental annexations, e.g. supervisors, directors, etc. The revenues for the analysis �
are derived from the 2011 budget assumptions specifically associated with the Benson �
Hill area. Finally, factors for inflation to both revenues and costs have been added. �
s
The fiscal analysis for the Windstone V annexation indicates that the area would �
�
represent a positive fiscal impact on both the Operating Fund and the Capita) Enterprise �
Page 2 of 3 �
�
�
�
r
� Rich Zwicker,Council Presid� `
:
Page 2 of 2 �' �i
February 27,2012
Funds. The positive impact is estimated for both for the current impact and the
estimated impact in ten years.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed Windstone V Annexation has been certified as having sufficient signatures
representing at least 60% of the area's assessed value. It also has reasonable
boundaries and appears to comply with Boundary Review Board objectives. Reviewing
staff raised no objections to this annexation. The proposed Windstone V Annexation
furthers the City's Business Plan goals and is in the general welfare and interest of the
City. The Administration recommends the Council accept the 60% Direct Petition and '�,
authorize staff to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board
for King County. '
i
�
6
�
P
i
i
�
�
, �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
, �
�
�
f
�
F{.
fp
f
�.
�p
P
�
R
S
�
S
4
t
�
�
�
�
�
t
�£
d
t
�
k
�
#
�
Page 3 of 3 �
�
E'
}
City of Rentc�n
:. � � � Plar;ni�lc� Diuisian
a
,
Kin Count ��������
J Y
Department of Assessments I,10 d Hara
Accounting Division 3'
500 Fourth Avenue,ADM-AS-0725
Seattle,WA 98104-2384 ASSBSSOY
(206)296-5145 FAX(206)296-0106
EmaiL•assessor.info@kingcounty.gov �
htta://www.kinEcountv.eov/assessor/ ��
�I
i
i
ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION I
s
�
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted January 27, 2012 to the �
�
King County Department of Assessments by Angie Mathias, Senior F
Planner for the City of Renton supporting the annexation to Renton of �
the properties described as the Windstone V Annexation, have been �
�
examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed a
value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King �
County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be �
sufficient under the provisions of the Revised Code of Washington, e
Section 35A.01:040. �
�
�
The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the �
petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, �
nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time �
frame, and this document does not certify such to be the case. �
i
�
t
Dated this 31St day of January, 2012 �
�
�
---`..� - _ � � �.
_ c�� �.. �
County Assessor �
�.
�
�
�
�
�
,
,
�
�
�
�
,.
�
�
�
�
� City of Renton
� Plannin Divisio
g n
a , ._.
King County ��������
Department of Assessments
Accounting Division Lloyd Hara
500 Fourth Avenue,ADM-AS-0725
Seattle,WA 98104-2384 f�SSCSSOY
(206)296-5145 FAX(206)296-0106
Email:assessor.info@kingcounty.gov
http://www.kinecounty.gov/assessor/
ANNE�CATION PETITION CERTIFICATION
,I
�
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted January 27, 2012 to the �
I
King County Department of Assessments by Angie Mathias, Senior
Planner for the City of Renton supporting the annexation to Renton of �
the properties described as the Windstone V Annexation, have been �
examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed
value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King
County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be �
sufficient under the provisions of the Revised Code of Washington, �
Section 35A.01:040. �
r
k
4
$�
&
The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the �
petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, �
nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time `
�
frame, and this document does not certify such to be the case.
- - -
�:
- - �
Dated this 31St day of January, 2012 �
�
�
�
.�..... G
`�-_.___�____ .�----�-� - —, �
c�.� �..._.
County Assessor
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
i
�
�
�
�
� �
KBS Development Corporation
Corporate Resolution November 22,2011
It is hereby resolved that any of the officers of KBS Development Corporation may sign
annexation submittal petitions&documents for the plat Windstone Division 5
(Horne/Bowman Properties located on Renton-Issaqua.h Rd,Renton Wa) into the City of
Renton on behalf of the corporation and said signing shall be binding on the corporation. ,
;
i
i
Officers: I
�
.� Date_�7�`�'� `
K in B. a or P sident �
�
�
�
�
k
�
Date / x
Solo an V. vzaradel-Sec/Treasurer �
�
�
�
l
. �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�.
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
6
�
�
�
z
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
C111'OF REIVTpN
� JAN 2
5 2012
PETITION TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF RENTON C�y��RK'SOFFICE
UNDER RCW 35A.14.120
(60% Petition—Windstone V Annexation)
T0: THE CITY COUNCIL Submitted by: �, � G� -
OF THE CITY OF RENTON Address: 1;.Z3��; �(,1` �C �Sj ��v
C/0 City Clerk �,�i���� ���� �k`1���
�. ,
1055 South Grady Way ��
Renton, WA 98057 Telephone: �C't�. �7SS�S 'l
The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent(60%) in value according to the ,
assessed valuation for general taxation, of real property located contiguous to the City of '
Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the j
provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. ;
The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County,Washington, and is contiguous to �
the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1)and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of �
this petition.
In res onse to a dul filed and considered "N ' ' " �
p y o t i c e o f I n t e n t i o n t o c o m m e n c e a n n e x a t i o n �
proceedings,the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW �
35A.14.120 on April 4, 2011. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the
proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120,the undersigned petitioners agree �
�
to: �
�
(1) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan land use designation as it �
affects the subject property; and �
�
(2) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for �
the subject property consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, �
�
all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of �
such meeting. �
i�
WHEREFORE,the undersigned property owners petition the City Council and ask:
i
i.
(a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such h
proposed annexation,cause a notice to be published and posted, �
specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all
persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their �
approval or disapprova) of such annexation or to ask questions; and �
(b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by �
the Boundary Review Board,the City Council by ordinance annex �
the above described territory to become part of the City of Renton,
Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter �
in force,and to receive City public services. �
�
�
�
�
� �'
Windstone V Annexation
This two page form is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking
the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated,
and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures.
WARN/NG: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name,or who
knowing/y signs more than one of these petitions,or siqns a petition seeking an election when he or '��
she is not a leqal voter,or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not quali�ed to sign,or who '
makes herein any false statement,shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. !
�
�
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. �
. ;
(Names of petltioners should be in identical form ps the same that appear on record in the chain of tit/e to the rea!estate.) �
�
�
Tax Lot Legal No. ;
Signature and Mailing Description �
Date Printed Name Address ��.B�oc,Plat,Assessor's No.or �
T� ____ other) ,
1. -� -- - --- - -------�- �,�32c� nJ��'��oo �
�a���i Z � 63 z3 aSg a 7 ao� �
2. - -----� - --------�L---- �-�oa �
� � 3�.0 �.��s�-
� z a 9� o �
� g
3. ���� - ---`=�- ---- -`'�----------- I�'b/� SF��+��� . �
i a3Z3 o.��Z3 ao8' �
a. ►1�� -- --- -- -- - - -------- - ------ �����"� �
������ �
�
�
5. -------------------------------------
6. ------------------------------------- �
�
�
7. ------------------------------------- �
�
8. ------------------------------------- �
€
9. ------------------------------------ �
_ �
10. ------------------------------------ �
_ �
�
. %
�
�
�
WINDSTONE V ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The East half of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 2,Township 23
North, Range 5 East,W. M., in King County, Washington except those portions annexed to the I
City of Renton by Ordinance Nos. 5068 &5293. ',
�
a
�
_ �
_ �
�
�
_ �
€�
F
�
g�
i
, €
�
�
�
�g
F
�
4
�
a
a
P
�
�
t
�
Page 1 of 1 (0344)
�
�
�
�
�
�
.�.__ �.._�...�_, w.� �.u� �,.��,.,.....,,� :.�,��.. �,..�._� �,�u�.m.�._�.��w..,;..�...�..� . .� � ..�...�._.. ..�...., _.,o.�.� , �.,.�,N.,�.�. .� ..�..�.......,��. ,�<. , m,. ��.�
3 ,, _ . . _ �. � Pnva#e Rd
, � - . .
, , . ; �.....v� � .
, .
.
, �.. . . ; �.
, � .. �:
, , ,,. . _.....
, w.. , . .,.
, ,
, , .
N , .
°4uiam , � w ' W hFE�t �� .
P ; :
, �N. ,�
,
E �
. . _ : � ' .
;
.., , _ �..
,
; :
,
, ; ,
� � _... � ; , �
w
._ , ;
' _.:. 9
_--� �.€-1:�# ' ` ._,,. . _. _ . ....._ , r._.. �. . .�
.�..�' i
, : _ .
, , ..
E ?6th St " � ` � : �
� .,.........�.._.. w
� � . .._..
;. . o
,.., � ! - ..... ___....
....,, ,
tl , . . . .... .—
- : _. . ..... .
....... _._� ,
: � ; .-„ i
...._... .�, � ;
_. __�_: : �
� �
� !
a
� .. ?
, cw # �
� > , i
0 Q -
�. � w !
� � . �
�. ,� ,
,
� �: ;
.
� � f
� _.. ; c
�.._ �
` " a
, ,
� , �, ...; a } ., � : ...»......._ ,--. - __ .,.,.._ , m, _ '. . ...,... ;
..._ � ( i ' 'i � ..)
$ . . .., - '� ' _ ' -
...... . . ........... ' �' : � ; •. .
; ....... . -... . _' ' � ,
:
` ; Y - May Yalley Park
k
, ! . ,
i : � .. , . .._. . '
" ..,. ..; _ _
. ^ ..... , i .......... . .
i .... .
A �
�
�. . �.�....__.
� ' � � __.. _.__.... _ ._._� .__. ,.... �
� , ,
t
�ti ,..�_,_..
=:E: <<}T„r. � . _s �����,-.:,#3;�;�._-_.�,,,.�. _,�s��„�<<.,:,.,�,,,.�. <t:;3 �:, ate: 2 8 2
'.'IP,�.�£iQ=;n'.! t73C�C:.,,'11!'.�.�..,1� 'rli;, .a.�_:14?''nt =l:l:ll:;;..4'"it.HiiC}`r i.R.'✓1'.iYi1:�n
0 300 600eet '. `,�� , .,.9�:.�: � � Windstone V Annexation
1:3,000
�` Vicinity Map
Community & Economic Development ,_;r l`;..�
Alex Pietsch,Administrator `' t'�
�,4�,;_Y Annexation Boundary
Adriana Abramovich, Planning Technician II i� ,� ,,„„..,�
_�:.�;�y��.��:: . .,_ . _. ,� . N
____ _..� its
� t� � ity Lim"
« City of~: /� �; .n 3 --s
,. � ����,_,��_� ,� �__ , �-F{� ,r�,'l � . .�:� �,� , Parcels
_.; _., � _ ' .. _�;,�:... \..,;;:
. .�.. .�.�,.�..�. . :� �,. v,...�,,.� .,�..�,:_:. , _.__ �_ �-�� _ .�..�..� .....�..:a.,��.,�.�,,�.,�.. .��,�.� �m.,� _
WINDSTONE V ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS
� Housing Units Population
Current 4 11 �
Year 10 12 32 ���
Assumption: 2.7 Persons per single family household
�perating Fund Reuenues
TotalRevenues
Existing Year 10 2011 Rate Existing. . $�x033.98 :
- .
Regular levy $2,999.16 $9,840.42 2.83207 Year 10 -$16,F38(�:�7
Assumption: $1,059,000.00 Base year taxable value of area
� State Shared Revenues
Per Capita Existing Year 10
Liquor tax $4.61 $49.79 $149.36
Liquor Board profits $7.44 $80.35 $241.06
Fuel Tax $12.73 $137.48 $412.45
Art St Fuel Tax $6.79 $73.33 $220.00
Crimina)justice $2.19 $23.65 $70.96
Total $33.76 $364.61 $1,093.82
Miscellaneous Revenues
Per Capita Existing Year 30
Sales Tax,U $19.84 $214.27 $802.79
Utility tax $82.39 $889.85 $3,333.90
Fines&forfeits $13.96 $150.77 $45230
Permit $15.35 $165.82 $497.45
Plan Review $9.24 $99.82 $299.46
Franchise Fees $13.86 $149.69 $560.82
Business Licences n/a n/a n/a
Total $154.65 $1,670.21 $5,946.72
Assumptions: 13.0% Annual population/housing unit growth rate based on capacity for new housing in area
2.59�o Annual inflation
Page 1 of 3
_. _.�.._.�.. ..,..� �..�..�.�,.� .� .���,_.�,.�.. .�..,�. ...��....,�..m.tl�.�. ,�,..� _...�..�.�.�,�. -�..�.....�..�. �....�.,�.��.. .�.,�.�.,.,..� .,..au,.. ._ ..�..�.�
Operating Fund Costs WINDSTONE V ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS
,,, Per Capita
Driver Per Capita Existing Year 10
Executive
Communications(Print Shop) Population $1.57 $16.96 $68.13
Hearing Examiner New Development $1.67 $17.99 $72.28 Total Costs
City Attorney Criminal Prosec. $3.10 $33.48 $134.53 Existing $3,842.65
Court Services Population $15.34 $165.67 $665.69 Year 10 $15,107.35
Community and Econ Dev
Econ Dev Commercial SqFt No commercial SF in area
Planning Population $8.03 $86.72 $348.47
Dev.Services Population $23.21 $250.67 $1,007.22
Community Services
Human Services Population $5.69 $61.45 $246.92
Special Events/Neigh. Population $2.41 $26.03 $104.58
� Parks Planning,Nat Res. Population $1.92 $20.74 $83.32
Fire
Comm Risk Reduction Population $7.81 $85.89 $345.14
Total $70.74 $765.60 $3,076.28
Per Acre/Mile/Call for Service
Per Acre/
Driver Mile/Call Existing Year 10
Community Services
Parks Park Acreage $2,497.03 $0.00 $0.00
PBPW
Street Maint Feet of Roadway $2.23 $0.00 $642.16
Transportation Systems Feet of Roadway $0.30 $0.00 $1,068.64
Police
Patrol,Operations,Invest,and Jail Calls for Service $268.10 $774.28 $3,111.16
Valley Comm Calls for Service $26.50 $99.64 $400.37
Fire
Emergency Response Calls for Service $1,167.72 $1,842.81 $5,360.90
� Total n/a $2,716.73 $10,583.24
Per FTE
Driver Existing Year 30
Community Services
Facilities FTE's $185.31 $744.61
Finance&IS
IS FTE's $102.11 $410.30
HR
Admin FTE's $24.45 $98.25
Risk Reduction FTE's $48.45 $194.67
Total $360.32 $1,447.83 Net Operatin�Fiscal Impact
Assumptions: 3.39�o Annual increase in costs Existing $1;191.33
0 Acres of parks in area Year 10 , $1;77,3:62
0 Existing linear feet of roadway
215 Year 10 linear feet of roadway
Page 2 of 3
,.. . .. . .��.�..� �.�,�� .�. .�..�.
�,.� .. � ....� .. . . �, . . ...�.,,W - �.�,.� .�.,..�,� �...�.�., :.� _...� ���
� .: ._._.. .�� ,.� .w, �:
.•
WINDSTONE V ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS
� >.
Capital and Enterprise Funds
Real Estate Excise Tax Tota)Revenues
Per Capita Existing Year 10 Existing $1,137.19
Revenue $24.64 $266.11 $997.01 Year 10 $11,775.95
Public Works-Surface Water
Per Housing Unit Existing Year 10
Rate Revenue $124.44 $871.08 $3,263.58
Maintenance and Utility Costs -$68.28 -$477.98 -$1,920.59
Balance $56.16 $393.10 $1,342.99
ublic Works-Waste Water
Per Housing Unit Existing Year 10 Total Costs
Rate Revenue $286.56 n/a $7,515.36 Existin
g $477.98
Wastewater Maint.and Utility Costs -$156.06 n/a -$4,389.53 Year 10. $6,310.11
Balance $130.50 n/a $3,125.83
Public Works-Water
Per Housing Unit Existing Year 10
Water Maint.and Utility Served by Water Dist 90
Assumptions: Area not currentiy served with sewer service,service will occur with development
3.3% Annual increase in costs
7 Existing Housing Units
47 Year 10 Housing Units Capital&Enterprise Balance
13.0% Annual population/housing unit growth rate based on capacity for new housing in area Existing $659.21
2.5% Annual inflation Year 10 $5;465.84
Page 3 of 3
i
�
k OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BIL�
•d � ;
A �
Ai#:
i
6
F
F
Submitting Data: For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. Department of Community and January 9, 2012 �
Economic Development �
Staff Contact...... Angie Mathias, x6576 Agenda Status �
Consent.............. X �
Subject: Public Hearing..
PROPOSED ANNEXATION Correspondence.. �
Windstone V Annexation— 10% Notice of Intention to Ordinance............. 4
Commence Annexation Proceedings Petition Resolution............
Old Business........ '
Exhibits: New Business....... �
Issue Paper Study Sessions...... �
Map Information......... �
10% Petition �
�
Recommended Action: Approvals: �
. Lega) Dept......... X �
Council concur �
Finance Dept...... �
Other............... �
�
�
Fiscal Impact: �
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... �
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... t
Total Project Budget N/A . City Share Total Project.. �
�
SUMMARY OF ACTION: �
The petitioner submitted this petition to the City Clerk on November 23, 2011. The proposed
4.3-acre annexation site is located near northeastern portion of the City, immediately north of �
Sunset Boulevard NE. The area is abutted by the current City limits at its northern, eastern, and �
southern boundaries. State law requires a public meeting with the proponents within 60-days �
of their submittal to consider their request. �
r
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: �
Set January 23�d, 2012 for a public meeting to consider the 10% Notice of Intention to Commence �
Annexation Proceedings petition for the proposed Windstone V Annexation.
�
f
�
�.
�
6
�
�
�
�g
k
�
Fp�
4
9
i
- � � �
r 1
�
�
,��Y p� CITY OF RENTON �
` �; � ♦ DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT �
=■ � �
��N�p
MEMORANDUM �
�
�.
�
&
�
DATE: January 9, 2012 �
E
TO: Rich Zwicker, Council President �
City Council Members �
f
�
VIA: Denis Law
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator �
C
STAFF CONTACT: Angie Mathias (x6576) �
�
SUBJECT: Annexation Notice of Intent—Windstone V �
�
�
�
�
>
ISSUE: �
�
The City is in receipt of a 10% Notice of Intent petition to annex 4.3-acres by the direct petition �
method. The proposed annexation is called Windstone V. State law requires that the Council �
hold a public meeting with the annexation proponent within 60 days of receipt of a 10% Notice �
of Intent petition. The purpose of the meeting is for Council to decide whether to accept or �
reject the proposal and whether to require the simultaneous adoption of City zoning consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan, if the proposed annexation is successful. �
�
RECOMMENDATION: �
On the basis of the following analysis, the Administration recommends that Council accept the �
10% Notice of Intent petition. If Council concurs, the Administration recommends that it take �
the following actions (pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120): �
s.
• Accept the 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition; and �
• Authorize the circulation of a 60% Direct Petition of Annex for the 4.3-acre area; and �
• Require that property owners within the proposed annexation area accept City of
Renton zoning that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan land use
designation.
�
�
�
BACKGROUND SUMMARY: �
The proposed 4.3-acre Windstone V Annexation is bordered by the existing City (imits at its �
northern, eastern, and southern boundaries and is located immediately north of Sunset �
Boulevard. This area was part of the Sunset East unincorporated island annexation that was �-
�
�
Page 1 of 6 �
�
�
k
Proposed Annexation—Windstone V
,
� �
initiated by the City in 2009, but was then repealed by voters of the area. The area did not '
become a part of the City and a property owner in the area is now seeking this proposed
Windstone V annexation using the 60% Direct Petition method, which is a property owner I
driven annexation process. �
i
1. Location: The Windstone V Annexation area is located south of Northeast 16th Street if
�
extended, west but not abutting 148th Avenue Southeast, north Northeast Sunset a
Boulevard, and east of Jericho Avenue Northeast if extended. �
2. Assessed value: The 2011 assessed valuation for the subject annexation site is $1,059,000. �
�
3. Natural features: The site is generally level with the highpoint at the western portion of the �
area. The topography then descends to the east with no steep slopes present. Greenes i
Stream, a Class IV waterway is present at the eastern boundary of the area. �
�
4. Existin� land uses: Existing development is residential and vacant land. There are an �
estimated 4 single-family homes and the estimated existing population is 11 people. There �
are 2.9-acres of vacant land.
5. Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject annexation site
as Residential Low Density(RLD). �
�
6. Existin� zonin�: The existing King County zoning is R-4, allowing four dwelling units per �
gross acre. The area was pre-zoned R-5 as part of the May Valley Prezone in 1997, �
Ordinance #4667. However, the R-5 zone is no longer in use in the City of Renton. The �
zoning classification that most closely matches the density allowed in the former R-5 is R-4. �
The area is designated Residential Low Density (RLD) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land �
Use Map. There are three zones that implement the RLD designation: Resource �
Conservation (1 dwelling unit per 10 acres), Residential One Dwelling Unit per Acre (R-1), �•
and Residential Four Dwelling Units per Acre (R-4). As part of this annexation process, the �
City will hold two public hearings in the matter of zoning for the area. �
�.
7. Public services: All responding departments and divisions noted that the annexation F
represents a logical extension of their respective services and systems. Specific comments �
follow. �
F
�
Water Utilitv. The proposed annexation area is within King County Water District 90's �
service area. Any person seeking to develop or redevelop property must obtain a �
�
certificate of water availability from Water District 90 prior to beginning development. �
Because the area is within the service area of Water District #90, the annexation would �,
not create any need for additional City staff.
�
r
Wastewater. The annexation site is located within the Renton Sewer Service Area. The �
area is relatively underdeveloped and it is expected that, if sewer lines were to be �
extended in the future, the costs would be incurred by a developer. Staff indicated the
�
�
Page 2 of 6 �
�
6
�
Proposed Annexation—Windstone V
, � � I
. i
annexation is a logical extension of their services and would not require any additional I
staff or costs to serve. '
Surface Water Utilitv. The proposed annexation area is within the May Creek drainage !
. basin. This drainage basin has been identified as having significant erosion, water '
E
quality, and habitat problems due to urbanization. The site contains Greenes Creek, a �
tributary stream to May Creek. Staff noted that any future applications for $
development in the City will need to comply with the City adopted Surface Water Design �
Manual (2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and City amendments RMC 4-
6-030) and that the flow control standard to be applied to new construction in the area
is the Flow Control Duration standard matching Forested Site Conditions. Staff noted �
that King County records indicate one drainage complaint was (odged in 1996 for SR900 �
runoff. The area contains no infrastructure on site and no ditch along the north side of �
SR900. Runoff is conveyed via sheet flow to the seasonal stream channel. A culvert �
carrying discharge from the south side of SR900 discharges to the stream as well. Staff �
stated that the annexation is a logical extension of their services. There is no �
infrastructure or right of way to maintain currently within the area.
�
Parks. King County's May Creek Park is located approximately 400 feet east of the �
annexation area. It is 54.27 acres in size and has walking trails. The City of Renton owns
Kiwanis Park located approximately 1.1 mile southwest of the annexation area. The a
park has an activity building, ball fields, a basketball court, playground equipment, �
restrooms, and tennis courts. Community Services staff indicated that in the long-term �
the 4.3-acre potential annexation area and the larger area should be served with a �
neighborhood park which would require land acquisition. Staff indicated that the �
annexation represents a logical extension of their services. Also, there would be no City �
�
assumption of responsibility for facility maintenance. �
�
a
Fire. Eastside Fire and Rescue currently serves the area. Upon annexation, Renton Fire �
and Emergency Services will provide fire and emergency services to the area. Staff
�
indicated that the annexation represents a logical extension of their services and would �
not require additional facilities or staff to serve. �
�Police. It is estimated that the area would have 3.8 calls for service per year at current �
development and 11.3 at full development.
�
�
Transportation. The reviewing staff noted that the area does not have curb, gutter, �
sidewalk, and street lighting along NE Sunset Boulevard (SR900). The City does not have �
plans for street improvements here, but Washington State Department of �
Transportation (WSDOT) has identified the need to improve State Route 900 by �
widening the road and installing curb, gutter, sidewalks, and street lighting, which would �
require some acquisition of right-of-way by WSDOT. A timeline for these proposed �
improvements has not been developed. The costs associated with the identified �
improvements of SR 900 would be paid for by WSDOT or possibly future development. �
The annexation would not require any additional transportation systems staff. Energy �
�.
F
Page 3 of 6 �
�
�
�
a.
Proposed Annexation—Windstone V
, � � i
. �
costs associated with new street lighting would be incurred by the City, but should not i
�
be a financial burden. Staff noted that the annexation represents a logical extension of �
�
their services. ?
�
!
Development Services. The Development Services section did not indicate any concerns
;
regarding the proposed annexation and reported that no additional staff would be �
required to serve the annexation area. The proposed Windstone V Annexation Area is �
located in a portion of the City where it is required that physical addresses be changed �
to the City of Renton addressing system upon annexation, therefore households will
have their physical address changed when the annexation becomes effective. �
�
8. Fiscal Impact Analvsis �
�
A fiscal analysis for the proposed annexation is attached.The fiscal impact analysis that �
is used for annexations considers costs on a per capita basis.The fiscal analysis indicates €
that to the operating budget the proposed annexation would have an initial net positive �
,
fiscal impact of 3,120 per year. Over a 10-year buildout period if the area developed 4
with an additional eight new dwelling units, it is estimated that the fiscal impact to the ¢
operating budget would become positive at$7,480 per year. The analysis for the impact �
to the capital and enterprise funds is that at current levels the area would have a �
positive fiscal impact of$659. If the area fully developed to its estimated residential �
capacity, over the next 10-years,the fiscal impact would be positive $5,466. �
�
ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION: �
1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan �
Renton's Comprehensive Plan annexation policies generally support this proposed �.
annexations. The subject site is within the City's Potential Annexation Area and has ;
been subject to development pressure under the King County Comprehensive Plan, �
zoning, and subdivision regulations (Policies LU-36 and LU-37). The area would also be �
available for urbanization under Renton's Residential Low Density land use designation. �
Renton is the logical provider of most urban infrastructure and services to the area �
(Policy LU-38). �
2. Consistency with the Boundary Review Board Objectives �
g
(from RCW 36.93.180)
a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities;
The proposed annexation would cause no disruption to the larger
community. �
b. Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, E
highways, and land contours;
r
The subject site is bounded on its western portion by existing City limits and `
uses streets or parcel lines for the other boundaries. �
�
�
�
�
e
Page 4 of 6 �
�
Proposed Annexation—Windstone V ,
� � i
' I
i �
�
c. Creation and preservation of logical service areas; �
Water and sewer service boundaries will not change as a result of this a
annexation.The Tess Annexation Area is in the Issaquah School District.The �
school district boundaries will not change,the area will remain in the
�
Issaquah School District. Renton will take over police service for the 16.3- G
acres upon annexation; the King County Sheriff's Department currently �
provides police protection to the area. Renton Fire and Emergency Services !
currently provide service under contract to Fire District#25 which serves the �
area. Pursuant to state law,there will be no change in the garbage service �
provider for at least seven years. �
�
d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries; �
This annexation does not have irregular boundaries. �
e. Discouragement of multip/e incorporations of small cities and �
encouragement of incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand
�
population in heavily populated urban areas; �
E
Not applicable. No incorporations are proposed in this area. �
f. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts; �
a
F
Not applicable.There are no inactive special purpose districts here. �
g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries; �
Not applicable. �
h. Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to ciries or towns of �
unincorporated areas which are urban in character; �
i
King County has designated this area for urban development because of its �
location within the Urban Growth Boundary.The County has also indicated �
that it wants to divest itself from providing urban services to these �
unincorporated urban areas by turning them over to cities as quickly as �
possible. Because the subject annexation site is within Renton's PAA and not �
in an area under consideration for incorporation, annexation is appropriate �
at this time. �
i. Protection of agricultura/and rural lands which are designated for long term �
productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted ;
by the county legislative authority. `
Not applicable. No portions of the proposed annexation are rural or �
designated for long term productive agricultural use in the King County or �
Renton Comprehensive Plans. �
�.
CONCLUSION: �
a
�
�
The proposed annexation is consistent with relevant County and City annexation policies, as �
well as Boundary Review Board objectives for annexation. Reviewing staff has identified no �
�
�
�
Page 5 of 6 �
�
�
Proposed Annexation—Windstone V ;
� t �
. ;
s �
9
impediments to the provision of City services in any of the areas. It is recommended that the k
annexation proponent be authorized to circulate a 60% Direct Petition to Annex. �
k
�
�;
�
i'
c
�
�
i
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
r
r
a
�
�
e
�
�
4
�
�
F
�
�
#
0.
Y
P
�
F
S
�
�
�
�
k
�
�
i
�
�
�
a
r
a
�
�
�
e
�
�
4
�
s
F
�
�
Page 6 of 6 �
f
�
y�..�.�:�� �,�.,.���,�.�. . ��.. ...,�..�.m��,...:�,�. �,..�.�..�,�. �..,...� � _..�,�,...�m�.,�.�,n�,
. W.�.. ���,�.. ....�.;_.�. ,
WINDSTONE V ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS
Housing Units Population
Current 4 11
Year10 12 32
Assumption: 2.7 Persons per single family household
-�._ „r�.� _
�3per. ir�g .urt�Revenn�s.
TotalRevenues
Existin Year 10 2011 Rate Existin `�� °�3 q����'��
g g "`:=�:W�$'.�,. �d ..�':`=`;�
Reular le `�b-v ;. �:'�.`.�.:.`
g W $2,999.16 $9,840.42 2.83207 Year 10:sf,-r��._b,`�$t3:�'��:��;:
Assumption: $1,059,000.00 Base year taxable value of area
� State Shared Revenues
Per Capita Existing Year 10
Liquor tax $4.61 $49.79 $149.36
Liquor Board pro�ts $7.44 $80.35 $241.06
Fuel Tax $12.73 $137.48 $412.45
Art St Fuel Tax $6.79 $73.33 $220.00
Criminal justice $2.19 $23.65 $70.96
Total $33.76 $364.61 $1,093.82
Miscellaneous Revenues
Per Capita Existing Year 10
Sales Tax,U $19.84 $214.27 $802.79
Utility tax $8239 $889.85 $3,333.90
Fines&forfeits $13.96 $150.77 $452.30
Permit $15.35 $165.82 $497.45
� Plan Review $9.24 $99.82 $299.46
Franchise Fees $13.86 $149.69 $560.82
Business Licences n/a n/a n/a
Total $154.65 $1,670.21 $5,946.72
Assumptions: 13.0% Annual population/housing unit growth rate based on capacity for new housing in area
2.5% Annual inflation
Page 1 of 3
.�..��..�:,.��..�.� _ __ �,.�,�.�. „�..,.�.�..,�:,�._,�,. �. ���.�.a �
Operating Fund Costs WINDSTONE V ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS
Per Capita
Driver Per Capita Existing Year 30
Executive
Communications(Print Shop) Population $1.57 $16.96 $68.13
Hearing Examiner New Development $1.67 $17.99 $72.28 Total Costs
„,�„,. ..�.,,a.,,a
CityAttorney Criminal Prosec. $3.10 $33.48 $134.53 Existing�,,;-: ,;; ,9�; �5-�;�_��::-R;
h�
Court Seroices Population $15.34 $165.67 $665.69 Year 10;�'�y,-;���9;���1�;.;",`,Fwi
Community and Econ Dev
Econ Dev Commercial SqFt No commercial SF in area
Planning Population $8.03 $86.72 $348.47
Dev.Services Population $23.21 $250.67 $1,007.22
Community Services
Human Services Population $5.69 $61.45 $246.92
Special Events/Neigh. Population $2.41 $26.03 $104.58
Parks Planning,Nat Res. Population $1.92 $20.74 $83.32
4.9 Fire �
Comm Risk Reduction Population In FD#25,already serve
Total $62.94 $679.70 $2,731.14
Per Acre/Mile/Call for Service
Per Acre/
Driver Mile/Call Existing Year 10
Community Services
Parks Park Acreage $2,497.03 $0.00 $0.00
PBPW
Street Maint Feet of Roadway $2.23 $0.00 $642.16
Transportation Systems Feet of Roadway $0.30 $0.00 $1,068.64
Police
Patrol,Operations,Invest,and Jail Calls for Service $268.10 $774.28 $3,111.16
Valley Comm Calls for Service $26.50 $99.64 $400.37
Fire
Emergency Response Calls for Service In FD#25,already serve
� Total n/a $873.92 $5,222.34
Per FTE
Driver Existing Year 10
Community Services
Facilities FTE's $185.31 $744.61
Finance&IS
IS FTE's $102.11 $410.30
HR
Admin FTE's $24.45 $98.25
� Risk Reduction FTE's $48.45 $194.67
Total $360.32 $1,447.83 Net Operatins Fiscal Impact
, Assumptions: 3.3� Annual increase in costs Existing�y:<�'�;� 3�� `Q4 ^�?.;�x.
��.�,. e -° �.
0 Acres of parks in area Year 10`°''.;���.;.,'m,_.�� �
0 Existing linear feet of roadway
215 Year 10 linear feet of roadway
Page 2 of 3
_ _ ______. .. .�.... .. � � �m �.,� �.�� � �.�.� .� ��. .�..��_��,....� ...m.�..�m.b.�� � �...�,w �.w�_.��.., .. .. �.,... :,� aa„_ .�.. _. :. � .... �� ,� . � �: . � ��..._.,..:,.�..�. .�.,. .,��,,.�,�,...�...�......,�,.,�
WINDSTONE V ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS
� ^^=� ��- � ,� _ . �::d'� �,�.,
Ca ta]�nCCI.� t�t�r`priSe,F��1S_'>�
... . � FFF�/`d�E-Fr�
.
1
w � '
w j ` ,�
Hoq �am / � P+ � W i',
i � �
�� � � I
� m
..---
_ :.e��
w
�
�
Q
� � -
� ,..: .:,,.:,,.. :
� — - :
� -
'�`-���:;�ri%r��;uti�IB�Pc�rk:-::''':`s=:��:�::;:�:���:;�::::::�:ii;
� _
A = -
-+ -
G -
C��"D '
n.
File Name: :\CED\Planning\GIS\GIS_projects\annexations\ ate:
WindstoneV anneximxdsil WindstoneV_annex_vicinity_B&W.mxd
° 3°° 6°° o �� � Bi1eu � - Windstone V Annexation
Feet H.,�,.,,,
1:3,000
Comrrrunity & Economic Development Vicinity Map
A�@X P�EtSCtty AC�171i1115tI�tC11' ��,,,�
C1
Acfri�r�aAbramov�ch, Pt�nn�ngTechnician li -. N �Annexation Boundary
� �_,.�
�O` �s..r City Limits
� ������ 'uY� ���' K.,< , , - � Parcels
, .� - .,.,�„�.. �.�..��_�.,��.m.�_.��.._._..��.._.�.�.��._. �. _�...
._^._e.��-�--.�����.�.�„-��--�._...._..,��,�.,,�.p....�_..._x.�n���,.F..�.�.A.�.�_m,�..._......�._..�m.._���...�..�.�.v,�r�_�_._�x_�.M,�.___.._.�.
3
�g
i
'�► � Annexation Review Form � �
y (Please return completed forms to Angie Mathias in CED) �
�
[ X] 60% Direct Petition to Annex �
f
�
TO . Building Surface Water Utility �
Fire Water Utility �
Parks Wastewater Utility �
Police Transportation �
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning �
�
FROM : Department of Community and Economic Development �
�
�
SUBJECT . Windstone V Annexation E
1
Location . The proposed 4.3-acre proposed Windstone V Annexation is located in the �
northeastern portion of the City. It is immediately north of Sunset �
Boulevard and in proximity of 148t"Avenue Southeast. �
�
Date Circulated: November 29, 2011 Comments Due: December 9. 2011 �
�
General Information �
Area . 4.3- acres �
Street length . 0 feet (existing) �
Assessed Value . $1,059,000 �
�
Estimated Population . 11 people �
Current Uses: �
Residential . 4 Dwelling Units �
Commercial . N/A �
�.
Industrial . N/A a
Public . N/A �
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density �
Future Uses: . + 8 New Single-family Detached Units �
Future Population . + 21 Additional People �
Reviewing Department/Division: /��U/'7/n / � �
� �
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or ignificant problems for your department/division? �
f
��/'j�� t
/ !✓✓ � F
�
�
�
F
�
�
F.
C,
d
�
i
i
' �Windstone V Annexation � �i I
3
�6 E
f
�
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the �
area? �J �
r ,' �
���'�--,`'V�'I �l C�.Q �''�G�/LQC-�' 2`��'�" �- ��.L 7�` �
�lp 7���� c��� c�yDc�l`�. �e-i 7`�.� .c�h' �
�zc.c �c ����/ /�' �
O� �� q � �iG��
�" - � ,o�rn�a�' f�����R` /����o�°�a--.� ����'�G� !��.s , �
3. D s this propose annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your �
department/division? l�
�
�
�
�
�
�
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other �
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �
��� ��� - ��.. �����-.��� �
� �. ..��-��1�� � � ����.� �
�� �a�...� .����, .
�� � ��� �
� � � �
�� ��' � �
�
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by =
another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? �
,��f� `
�
4
�
�
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, �
please indicate on the attached map.) �
i
r
�/� �
. �
�
General recommendation and comments: �
�
�
E
�'
�
�
�
fp
F,
/ k
Signature: Date: `c� '-�"�/ �
�
�
6
' Page 2 of 2 �
�
i
i
�
,i %� � �
�, �,,,r Annexation Review Form �
(Please return completed forms ta Angie Mathias in CED) �
3
�
[X] 60% Direct Petition to Annex �
t
TO . Building Surface Water Utility k
�
Fire Water Utility �
Parks Wastewater Utility E
• Police Transportation �
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning �
s
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development ;
;
>
SUBIECT . Windstone V Annexation �
�
Location . The proposed 4.3-acre proposed Windstone V Annexation is located in the �
northeastern portion of the City. It is immediately north of Sunset �
Boulevard and in proximity of 148th Avenue Southeast. �
�
Date Circulated: November 29, 2011 Comments Due: December 9. 2011 �
4
General Information
�
Area . 4.3-acres �
�
Street length . 0 feet (existing) �
E
Assessed Value . $1,059,000 �
Estimated Population . 11 people #
�
�
Current Uses: �
�
Residential . 4 Dwelling Units �
Commercial . N/A P.
Industrial . N/A �
Public . N/A �
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . +8 New Single-family Detached Units
Future Population . + 21 Additional People �
_ �
�
Reviewing Department/Division: PUBLIC WORKS/SURFACE WATER UTILITY �
�
�
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �
�
�
The annexation area is within the May Creek drainage basin, which has been identified as having �
significant erosion, water quality, and habitat problems due to urbanization. The site contains h
�
Greenes Creek, a tributary stream to May Creek. Any future development within the annexation �
area will need to comply with the City adopted Surface Water Design Manual (2009 King County �
Surface Water Design Manua) and City amendments— RMC 4-6-030). The flow control standard to �
be applied to new construction in the annexation area is the Flow Control Duration standard �
matching Forested Site Conditions. �
�
. �
�
�
�
i
i
+Windstone V Annexation ° '
* � � 1
�
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the �
area?
King County records indicate one drainage complaint lodged in 1996 for SR900 runoff. The area
contains no infrastructure on site and no ditch line along the north side of SR900. Runoff is �
conveyed via sheet flow to the seasonal stream channel. A culvert, carrying discharge from the �
south side of SR900, including Aster Park plat pond outfall, discharges to the stream channel as �
well.
x
�
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your �
department/division? �
3
The annexation area is a portion of a small island of unincorporated property. The proposed �
annexation is a logical extension of services provided. �
�
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �
�
t
Currently, the annexation area contains no infrastructure or right of way to maintain. As future �
development adds right of way drainage infrastructure and stormwater facilities, maintenance �
resources will be required. �
t
�
The annexation are currently contains four single-family residential properties. Annual stormwater �
revenue is estimated to be $498 per year.
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
�
another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? �
�
The site contains no surface water facilities or infrastructure. No agreements would be required. �
�
�
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, �
please indicate on the attached map.) �
�
Current boundaries are acceptable. �
�
�
General recommendation and comments: �
�
k
�
�
�
�
a
�
�
�
Signature: Ron Straka, ext 7248 Date: December 9,2011 �
�
�
�
Page 2 of 2 �
�
('
E
€
9f
1
. —' !
.4' - � i
� B
`s
, ti�Y p� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC i
P
� a: ,.,_ ♦ DEVELOPMENT :
� I
��N�p� M E M O R A N D U M �
;
1
a
;
DATE: November 29, 2011 �
TO: Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator i
Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator I
Kevin Milosevich, Chief of Police I',
Mark Peterson, Fire Chief ,
Iwen Wang, Finance & IS Administrator ,,
Nancy Carlson, HR & Risk Management Administrator ''
Larry Warren, City Attorney
Marty Wine, Assistant CAO
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT: Angie Mathias, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Annexation Review Form
An annexation review form for the proposed Windstone V Annexation has been circulated to
City Departments for completion. We have requested that the forms be returned by December
9, 2011. For your information, sample blank review forms and a map of the area is attached.
These are the same forms that have been routed to the various departments for review. The
table below indicates by section the staff person who has been sent the review form. We
appreciate your assistance in providing the information that contributes to adequate
annexation review. If you would prefer that additional or alternative representatives in your
departments receive this in a future annexation routing please let Angie Mathias know.
Community Services
Parks: Leslie Betlach
Public Works
Water Utility: Abdoul Gafour
� Surface Water Utility: Ron Straka
Wastewater Utility: Dave Christensen
Transportation: Bob Mahn
Public Works Maintenance: Bi�ll Wressell, Gary Fink, Richard Marshall
Community& Economic Development
Building: Larry Meckling
Current Planning: Jennifer Henning
Police
Police: Terri Vickers, Cyndie Parks
Fire & Emergency Services
Fira• Rill Flnra
cc: Chip Vincent
W "
' � �
� Annexation Review Form �`
�Please re��rn c�ra�pl+�ted fornns to Angie f�9a#hias ir� +CED� �
�
[X] 60% Direct Petition to Annex �
�
F
� TO : Building Surface Water Utility �
Fire Water Utility �
Parks Wastewater Utility �
Police Transportation ;
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
�
FROM : Department of Community and Economic Development ;
I
SUBJECT . Windstone V Annexation
Location : The proposed 4.3-acre proposed Windstone V Annexation is located in the �
northeastern portion of the City. It is immediately north of Sunset !
Boulevard and in proximity of 148th Avenue Southeast. i
Date Circulated: November 29, 2011 Comments Due: December 9, 2011 �i
General Information '
Area : 4.3- acres
Street length : 0 feet (existing)
Assessed Value . $1,059,000
Estimated Population : 11 people
Current Uses:
Residential : 4 Dwelling Units
Commercial . N/A
Industrial . IV/A
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . + 8 New Single-family Detached Units
Future Population . + 21 Additional People
Reviewing Department/Division: �w ,�rta-� �"� �-�
1. Does this annexation represent any uni ue or significant problems for your department/division?
/� !.� '
,,. .
;-, �.
Windstone V Annexation � �
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the '
area? � lj\ '
!v V I
,
!
I
�
. �
3. Does this ro osed annexation re resent a lo ical extension of services �
p p p g� provided by your �
departme�t/division?
�
�.� � 5 �
�
�
�
4. What additional facilities or staff w ? �
oufd be required to serve this area. Can you identify any other �
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation?
�4 s �x J � ��., �-�.�.� a �-�r--
� �' � �v r�...Q �-L�. d -f�-,.� o,..� -f'�^-�� w� � u.e-- �
&
-�--�c.a�.-. o-,.�- w:fi.�.� iln.t,�¢.q,�.�� _ `
�
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by �
another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? g
�
�/� �
�
<
�
�
�
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, �
please indicate on the attached map.) �
G N'�'i��-� T S I�w� ,
�
�
�
General recommendation and comments: �
�
�
�
_ �
r
f
�
/ �
Signature: Date: t � �
�
Page 2 of 2 �
�
�
w ��t _ �y.�-. . �.r
RE o Windstone V Proposed Annexation "�"' `''.`�;`� �; �
��,a��,� � ; ��-�.
` ,�� ;at�,t3i�n .. .
,.
• .. y �_ �y , .- . _ °'f a s!' - � ,� � t'Itl� �i
- tc� tit T... � ; �j�� ii K ' ,( �� _— --�r� i,.~s u �• I'tt��ti��th � `
y � ; , '' ir P�, t�.� � � ,� ��►a= :a .
rr i .'-3 ;.. r �• �� � ~�`'w�� .�. '..�-•. y,. � -�.C'ltl�.t�.h�� A�i<'I)(�?�x11.1t". -
� . ' ' :u • , p . � .�r
�
• ' " „ r
.
, � � .. _
. � .
.
�, _� •r A ., . . * , . . . ,_ - .le �,�+.. i1 j' ..
� ,
.
, .
-�_`"t"'�- .� � . Z �_y i y �� . � � .�:.�� � . �l?l A(i�. '.ti.
�IrWP/,��. r ` �. ' *• � � - _ 1:i:r� �_�hK: , rt�i�alt._
..A _ ` .' , > -
t.,�,-tiit. nu�rii»i�,�� -hl�6it
� . . . , • � 1 ,,s ..+i�. � _ ���y;�, �y �� � • .
�.. , '�- X .
�}.- Legend
.� '' ,ti'I;'I7!/r St �-
'+ �� �. . � Lakes and Rivers
�"' t y . � Parcels
'' -L .� .L- _ � ',. ` �'�'' _ - "
_ � I � � I I . �_�. '� .• Street Names
- (,� - •"�; :: _' � � , � I' Rights of Way �
� .i '�'a �� ,r� , ^x.� K ^�` � ��
�l " .� x' �, I y ;- , I Streets
� �/ '' '� _ ' ,,� � Roads
. ,
R � � �-
. -
,• < � t � . r � +.� . � � � ,. Jurisdictions
.
. ,
�. .» •. �.� � - �1t , �. . . �.. .• ,
�•
� ' ` " �
. i �� ,1 �r„ .. ��`: �.�..�s�
Bene��e
+t►+ <.J�..;,v�F,l�_� ,.
'' ♦ y.' , ,, ,� . : Des Moines
�
,�,ri � . � � t t � � .,�� t , . �. Y;+ , -,.k� Issaquah
� y f s R_, • � �1* 4 '✓'L,1 �. ..� Kent
{, - *'+ o. ��►-�y ��� Kin9 Counry
?' r � � ` �..;� �.`� �' ,� �� �t Mercerlsland I,
~ . ..°'"" \ y i .� : � i r � � � i NewcasUe
�rf . � �, u - •� � � ` *' _ � ''. r = • _ -` ��R, ��- } �r RENTON
� . , ti �r� ��� '� .� r • . � t . ' ...� _.,,.,,,,,... � , �'I SeaTac
.��.?". .� h .. a t �`, ..M ..' ""� !,r' � seattle
� -.•a I .. ��� � .'' j Tukwlla
�._.__. �� `1� y s : s,' �,c s
�'~`• ,�c�a .��' . �,�� "�X'+K Aerial(March 2010)
�i ,��{ '� ��1�� � ,�i. ,y'� �'�" ■ Red: Band_t
�y�` �;� � � .�• '7s ' ■ Green:Band 2
*����...�'0^�• ^' : y��"� '� � � I ■ Blue: Band 3
� .y�'� t r't � .� � -- ,�'�'F,�+�'� `� '1"j r
`��-�, ` � � a- — .�, _ �
� ��� �,�°"" �" •r � ' ''
a}. ~ r` ' . � � •;
11a�A t�'I*�'� # . .. - �. E` � S� - � f ,.�
� � _ lt Q'.�"�,f..!" � 'w..�.� ry � j ,� � .-� .
. .-____� ' \7' � � �
r �/'�� ' '_e� ry� �i
�� �:" �4 � '!� r �
� .
�.. . _: . .
4�:�,1 ' � _ �` �y-" � ' ��l� �4 , ��
�4+ .*,r '�--- �' - `
�4
' •�t S'/�il21hS!
.� �
..� .�,
� --� . �. �� .' �.. r �-'' rr; J � r.,.. i ,� ��., i'�'�, ..�'�"� .�';�t�.
li ' ;�'.�� �. ,.�, `-- -� � ,L 1:3,833
- �• � ; SE II21li P! � 1 j�, � R O
- '1r �' .���. ;r".. '�", .� i' � .. `, �8.5"x 11,�
�� _1 — �
g3g.g � 0 319.43 638.9 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and Notes
� _ �
is for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be Enter Map Description
accurate,current,or otherwise reliable.
City of Renton,Washington THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION
I
�
� +�` i
Annexation Review Form � �
(Please return completed forms to Angie Mathias in CED} �
�
�
�
[X] 60% Direct Petition to Annex �
�
E
TO . � Building Surface Water Utility �
Fire Water Utility �
Parks Wastewater Utility �
Police Transportation �
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning �
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development �
. �
SUBIECT . Windstone V Annexation �
�
�
Location : The proposed 4.3-acre proposed Windstone V Annexation is located in the �
northeastern portion of the City. It is immediately north of Sunset "
Boulevard and in proximity of 148th Avenue Southeast. �
�
�
�
Date Circulated: November 29, 2011 Comments Due: December 9. 2011 �
General Information �
Area : 4.3- acres �
. Street length . 0 feet (existing) �
Assessed Value : $1,059,000 �
Estimated Population . 11 people
�
Current Uses: �b� �
. f
r
Residential : 4 Dwelling Units , �
Commercial , . N/A �
Industrial : N/A , �
Public : N/A
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density
Future Uses: . +8 New Single-family Detached Units
Future Population . + 21 Additiona) People �
— �
�
Reviewing Department/ ivisio • Ti�.�..A.�S�a��'fE-'a'?o/v S°�ST�i�'S ___ �
�
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �
N �
°• �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
3 . . �
#� � . ' ,� . :
, � .'� �k . ...y t � �}� �'�.,;�" L'� �,�'/�n�� �
. t s . �
�`�' �@;I�t�4-S=M1 : tit4'•«'�nf �
" �
�
�
r
i
b
�,�hG �
�-.
Windstone V Annexation � � �
�
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the �
area? �
ye$. c�rh, �uf�cr, srde w a�k ��� s�'t��..�' �!J�.�fa� .��e rl o w+of-�,ac,s'�-sl�-�j ��
'f'�tG N� S�u���-��'�Je� S/�'F�aa�-�e���.x� c-�f'�tc ���as�� 'ot�tr►ex�'�+�K �e,�. �
77�t..�.: �t�� G��� �r� ,�O ,aa,� •��w �..f' rr��r�aV�����`. 1������ �.�"'�� �,
,,. ,,.„-�kc ,�a��', i►?hs �����i��' a acc� �vv c,c.�`d�-� F�,� �Jvo, b��-�i�,� KQ �
� � -��►-ncf°�61� .�r w��r+ � t�t����� wo��t�cC vc,�r�. �
�' �3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your �
department/division? �
�
��� �.
. �
�
�
r
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other �
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �
A��i,F�ou�l 7Ya�spp►�'af�vh Syf�'ew+s s��' wawl� �o�-+�� ��.�t�-�cd� �
���y �st,c a��t�t.������,vc�& ��cs.� y 1�1��� ��.� cca��s a,ss6��f� �
f�{J�'� Wt '��ir�GLL�N.Le �P..-XiS7t at4 «=�#b� Y�4.� ��"�'"�'�H��-� '��G. t.�hTYaI �
�J
,:. J-�� �� � ��' +�t��+���►� f�.���� f,�. ��e��a� �Y �'� �� �
����.=���� :r��� iS .��r�+�.��s�►�le��� ��i.�,�k��� ��cr���.-� ,
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by �
another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? �
� �
ta.
�
.� �� �����,���,� ��`��-��,�, r�� ������ �� �
-�r�a�.r�� ,� w n �� u��~�' �t r��,�'� �
� � �� �
�
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, �
please indicate on the attached map.)
�
�C+�. �i��°G- �°l� G����w�� W i '�"�i �- �+���:�'���.5 "�S �-��v�►�'�`� �
�����°��•
�
�
�
�
General recommendation and comments:
�
�
�'1�. �►�'�M��Pl�'��'f 7oH. ���'���,� �$�l��d�` �a""�,�` ��' �" r ��+�.,� �
i�"�►�f �,,t�► �t/,� �+��� �j r1�.k,�1°��? � .� �� �
���.�' Its�G�l�t�',� �
�
�
�
Signature: � Date: �Z 7/20�� �
R�v�av !�e«.4.�f o�' �
�
�. Page 2 of 2 �
�
�
,� " � �
i �
� Annexation Review Form �
�����'�"s�'�:+ �'['�€_ta t< �d,)d���2�d��'fa�� �>��e.i'.s �CA��#��?�i4 �s�s}s°s.-', d3i �,.�o���
F
4
k{
P
[X] 60% Direct Petition to Annex �
TO • Buildin Surface Water Utilit �
. g y
Fire Water Utility �`
Parks Wastewater Utility �
Police Transportation
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning
�.
�
FROM : Department of Community and Economic Development �
�
SUBIECT . Windstone V Annexation �
�
Location : The proposed 4.3-acre proposed Windstone V Annexation is located in the �
northeastern portion of the City. It is immediately north of Sunset �
Boulevard and in proximity of 148th Avenue Southeast. �
F
�
�
Date Circulated: November 29, 2011 Comments Due: December 9. 2011 x
�
General Information `
�
Area : 4.3- acres o
Street length . 0 feet (existing) �
Assessed Value . $1,059,000 ¢
Estimated Population : 11 people �
�
Current Uses: �
Residential : 4 Dwelling Units °
�
Commercial . N/A b�
Industrial . N/A �
Public . N/A �
�
Comp Plan Designation : Residential Low Density �
Future Uses: : + 8 New Single-family Detached Units �
Future Population : + 21 Additional People �
�
Reviewing Department/Division: � � t
�
1. Does t is annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �
�- �
�
�
�
�
�
�
�.
. �
�
_ �� �
Windstone V Annexation � , � �
�"
�
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the �
area? �,��� �
�
�
s
�
�
�
�
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your �
department/division? ��� ��L,���a4�� �ii� ���=y�i2�/d �
w �
i
�
�
kF
P
�
�
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other �
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �L�l �p �
�
t
�
k
r-
�
a
�
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by �
{
another jurisdi,�tion? ould new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? i
/� /C�. !.
J
�
�
�
�
�
�
, �
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, _
please indicate on the attached map.) ��� ������� �/�,�;������-l�j �
,
�
�
�
�
�.
General recom ndation and comments:
� /.��-s
�� ����� �
�
�
�
�
:
_.- �
�
�
�
Sig ture: Date: ,� ` C� < �
�
Page 2 of 2 �
�
F
E
�
�
�,
��
' � Annexation Review Form � �
.. �
(P6ease return corr��zl�ted forms to Angie Mathias in CED) F
�
�
[X] 60% Direct Petition to Annex §
�
�
TO . Building Surface Water Utility �
Fire Water Utility ;
Parks Wastewater Utility �
Police Transportation
�
Public Works Maintenance Current Planning �
f
�
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development �
�
�
SUBJECT . Windstone V Annexation
�
�
Location . The proposed 4.3-acre proposed Windstone V Annexation is located in the �
northeastern portion of the City. It is immediately north of Sunset
Boulevard and in proximity of 148th Avenue Southeast.
C
Date Circulated: November 29, 2011 Comments Due: December 9. 2011 �
�
�
�.
General Information �
Area . 4.3-acres �
Street length . 0 feet (existing) �
.
Assessed Value . $1,059,000 �
Estimated Population . 11 people �
Current Uses: �
Residential . 4 Dwelling Units
�
Commercial . N/A E
€
Industrial . N/A �
Public . N/A �
3
a
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density �
Future Uses: . +8 New Single-family Detached Units
Future Population . + 21 Additional People �
_
II.
Reviewing Department/Division:_Renton Fire & Emergency Services �
�
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �
�
No �
�
�
r.
�
�
�
0.,
�
�'
6
t
t
Windstone V Annexation �
� � �
2. Are ou aware of an roblems or deficiencies in existin infrastructure or service provision to the �
Y Yp g
area? There are no fire hydrants close ta this potential annexation. s
�
�
�
�
�
�
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your �
department/division? Yes �
Y
�
�
�
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other �
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? 0 �
�
�
k
�
�
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by �
another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? �
�
�
�
This potential annexation is currently served by Eastside Fire & Rescue althaugh RF&ES service area
surrounds it.
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, �
please indicate on the attached map.) �
�
�
Pp
I
�
General recommendation and comments: �
�
�
Recommend acceptance of proposed annexation. �
Page 2 of 3
�
�
�
�
NYindstone V Annexation
� �
. #
[_
�
�
�
�
Signature:_Bill Flora Date: 12/05/11 �
k
�
�
t
&
s
�
�
1
!
�
i
P-
�
$
�
ig
#
i
�
�
t
�¢
d[`
E
C
�
b
(
S
R
i
�
�
9p
5
i
5
�
�
�
�
4
�
k
�.
i
f4
€
�a
6
�
A
j,
�
�[
R
�
�
�
w
F
�
4
�}
Str
§
R
�
�
F`
F
F
�
�
<
�.
k
�
!
Page 3 of 3 �
�
�
�
�
t
�
' � Annexation Review Form �` �
(Pleas� re�urr� ct�rr�p9�t�d forrns to An,gi� I�i�thi�s ir� CE�) �
�
�
�
[X] 60% Direct Petition to Annex
TO . Building Surface Water Utility �
Fire Water Utility �
Parks Wastewater Utility . �
4
Police Transportation °
Public Works Maintenance . Current Planning �
�
E
FROM . Department of Community and Economic Development r
;
SUBJECT . Windstone V Annexation �
�
�
Location . The proposed 4.3-acre proposed Windstone V Annexation is located in the Y
northeastern portion of the City. It is immediately north of Sunset �
Boulevard and in proximity of 148t"Avenue Southeast.
�
Date Circulated: November 29, 2011 Comments Due: December 9. 2011 �
�
�
�
General Information �
Area . 4.3- acres �
Street length . 0 feet (existing) �
4
Assessed Value . $1,059,000 �
Estimated Population . 11 people
Current Uses:
Residential . 4 Dwelling Units
Commercial . N/A
�
Industrial . N/A �
Public . N/A
Comp Plan Designation . Residential Low Density �
Future Uses: . +8 New Single-family Detached Units
Future Population . + 21 Additional People �
_ �
�
Reviewing Department/Division: Water Utility Engineering by Abdoul Gafour 11/30/11 �
�
1. Does this annexation represent any unique or significant problems for your department/division? �
�
No. The proposed annexation is within the water service area of King County Water District No. 90. �
�
�
�
�
ky[
3'
�
� �
�'
�
�
Ey
�.' �
• Windstone V Annexation �„r �` t
i
r �
R
i
2. Are you aware of any problems or deficiencies in existing infrastructure or service provision to the �
area?
�
No. Applicants for new development and redevelopment projects shall contact Water District 90 at �
425-255-9600 and request a certificate of water availability from the District prior to any development �
within the annexation area. �
3. Does this proposed annexation represent a logical extension of services provided by your �
department/division? �
k
�
Not applicable. The proposed annexation is within the water service area of King County Water District No. �
90. �
�
g
r.
4. What additional facilities or staff would be required to serve this area? Can you identify any other �
costs the City would incur as a result of this annexation? �
�
No additional City staff would be required since King County Water District will continue to maintain and �
operate its existing water mains within the proposed annexation area. w
It is anticipated that developer's extensions of Water District 90's water mains will be required to provide �
water for fire protection and for domestic use for development within the annexation area. The applicants �
shall obtain a certificate of water availability from KCWD#90 prior to any proposed development within the �
annexation area. �
�
5. Would the City assume ownership or responsibility for facilities currently owned or managed by
another jurisdiction? Would new agreements or franchises be required as a result of this annexation? �
No. Ownership of water mains owned and operated by KCWD #90 will remain the same within their water �
service boundary. The City has an interlocal agreement with KCWD 90 for the operation of its water �
facilities within the City limits and rights-of-way. �
�
k
k,
6. Would alternate boundaries create a more logical annexation for provision of City services? (If yes, �
please indicate on the attached map.)
No. Water service boundaries are established by existing coordinated water system plan and
comprehensive water system plans �
�
t
General recommendation and comments: €
�
The City should notify KCWD 90 regarding the proposed annexation.
KCWD#90, Attention:Tom Hoffman -General Manager
15606 SE 128th St, Renton, WA 98059 Phone No. 425-255-9600
�
�
�
�,
Signature: Abdoul Gafour, Water Utilitv Supervisor Date: November 30, 2011 �
�
�
�
�
H:\CED\Planning\Annexations\Current Annexations\Windstone V�Dept Review Returned Forms\Water Utility-Abdoul.docx �
Page 2 of 2 �
�
, � -!: ". . � � ..�,� . ' � . "�� .
� �
4 ' `; � '� ,C�' ' „ • , , � � � q
, �. t �;� ,
� . ��, �- , �a ''I • - � .
:: � _
' - i s1� - �rj �t� `.��+ '.
� "1.. � ` I ,� �� ..;„„� L W 4. � �" be' �.
�
.
.
` ��� � �� N E 17't�h
. � ..
: _
,.�� � ��� � � ` �,
�' ; ^ . - �� ��t t N -�� ,
�� .,. ��� � L.L s 1 � A . . .�' �� . �P u
�• r
_ �.
�.� I � � , r •y� 5 �f i (^.§a ^I��
5'� • � i y . . � '�� �fi � a � ' vJ
.� y � ��� t�� t r .,�d, .. •.. . J�•• �` i� � y � �� ��; � ��'4Y�� 'r y �,"�,�v« c �,� �y'.
.— - ..��h �l��s � '�'t,'��k��,: , ..'"'7 �'�, , ��,. '��� �0' � 3 r''" '�: � �� � � �� � .�
�:
'
:.
.
.
r � �v� � � -r � ' i
w � ;�. N ES 1 �� � � �;� ..�. ` � � � .� -�.� .�a �, '- � �� o,
z �
,. � �� _� �, f :: �;�� �� �, �: � � � � _ .��..��r'�� ,���� _,� ��r,�
.
�,
� ��"�.. ��� � '�. �� ,� �� � �� �� ., o e — y�,�� � ��.�
�
� � `
� .. . _ � , � — .
.. � ,. ��- �� z�` �.� � ��: '� �:� � � - �'�`� �,:� x x �
� _�, � � �.r`�s � � � �� ` - . �. � '� ��"� ,�: ��+t'"`��.a
�� �. �. �
a �,�
. �
� ,
o � �..., � .
y_� �. . �,�, :
�� ���1'����,�
„ : �,
�, ,.
, �
'�
Uh ., + ' 4 m � .. � � "'� � �t +,.
� r .a' �` ? �'N _4. � ' ,. ��,+%1 '� �q ,
��„`'��� �. `� *� '•. ya«'ek, �:�' �� :� �°�.��fi.9r, ���"` '"+�
,, ��� � ',s �
..3�- ' . �w�- '�
�a ; fl � �
. � .� .zR� �� ;.� . � �t� �. � � "°-_ga`� :�� . i� � � '^�S4,� .
�'�� �� s� �.� � / � �
> ,
< "
��r� �Vl�`� .�.. ( � ' 1� .�" �'� �' ,
, ,
�:� � ���� � .
#� � .� � 1* ,�'� � � � ����r ��,�
�
� � r_. . �
, . _
u -�
�� � � +..� � � ` �,�� . .
1t"-.
, k '� ��` � ,�„
, . .
.
4�
, .- ,a rc� . W �Sfo-, J� �� "�K�
. I � ., �.. f . �� . . "` � �, •��/• ..�.�-. µ� � ��' � ���
+ r.
..�"�, a��'..4 :.y� ...._.w� " � .�;� t �}� '% � `x �pt`Y�"i�' '� �." ''.i � '+� °�"" � +:e�� §�' . '���.'.t
`¢-�-� � �n� ��'' �. �°�^' 4�"�' Y�'� t�g�'�� ' �:q � �
. . .:.. ' ` � ,
�, �', � �a ,
' � � ,� �� � � . W :.� , ... � e�^r:.�.. � �: � �� ����'�e" � ` �` �� ��a�.
;
..
.
,-
. .,: _
.. , �,. ..� .
«. .� �� , � . ..� . C� . . � .. ,.�.,. .,�� �a *t� ;.
— 5'��
� Y
�' � : 6
�� . a_'� � *b r" �''� �:"' . �4° i�5 E6
� ; , r
�yp, r� -0�. � � �� � �`�� �
'��`.� . ��f. �. . � , � <�, ���V` � �° �d� �# � �.;. .
� �'
� , r
., � � -..y � � ., � �. t ,. .
.:. ..`...Y, ..
- e � �� (
�
'`'*� ; �. �r = � �i �� � � �. �;
rv
5
. . .,
,
*� 'k � . �— - .� ,� , ,��, �. >
5
� y
� � _ � � r .�, ,��l` � e � `�� Q
.,
�-�• •. . . . . .'� .
.
:Y - " .:;. � "..._'.. .� :-� � ;' Y �� �., . �� t_��.. � . ,,.> � f� ,� ... .
w�� �,
�. . . ��_. �� �."' ��'° �'- �.-�.� � ,�-:
" k� ` w � � � �, r �' �� ',��t-
�^ . ! �y �p' �<�• �+. $ I�J
�. � � 1 tl�a�,� �'ul���y>�'u�-tc _
i 4 . � ' =,� ■ � ��~�. s� �� '� � � � .
� ''
, •'� ,�' ` w`��'�'��., . �y �� �' � ''� °� ��`
,
;, . �
` �,� .�� . �- �� � � ��',. � � � e t
�� G � � �' ��: » �
. .s�� • r;
,e '
� � ` r^' ,!�:" p, � � 9� . 6��� �.� ; *r � .. °�, aF �
v�.�� � �� };, (�p � , `� , �� � ?i §,t,�m`��
a n ��a." � r .. � �� s.; ��,:,�� � F:
* �� �y�` t ' �A/f�:. 7J� � , �j �o � � '��:��� �,. -�y� '�
. , .
., . _ _ . • �. ,
.
, � � , .
,
- �� . , : . � � _ R
�: .,
, a� :i �.w � v. rv.. . i . . - • y,. . vo-t B.' �t�
��-,�������� ���::���t��43r,n��;�,�������,���_pra,���s�,��,��x�t,o�,s� -- oate: ���o8,zo„- W i n d sto n e V An n exati o n
WindstoneV_annex\mxds\2 WindstoneV_aerial.mxd
0 255 510 �� "`'. . �� �
Feet ��°°"" Aerial
1:2500 N �
.�: "
Community & Economic Development
Alex Pietsch,Administrator p
Adriana Abramovich, PlanningTechnician II ""'" � DAnnexation Boundary
�—••�
--._._..�..�--*�""'I''" [ ;�����f i��� � �� � `�._�. � � �_..�City Limits
J � ���: '�` � � ����
��.... � �.�
i :
9/q.� , f �
, / .
r � ' i
� ! ; !
, �-' ,� �
H09 iam P �i z �}E 17t� .t j w
� E � Q � �
z � o � Q
E16h� Q �
N E 1'G"t'h"S't J � o
� �
U
� 1
�
�
,.�- `�,.
' �
��
, �
�
� (w ��a�,� ,,r,
v � �Sg'�
� `�'���� `\ � �.
r �
� � h�ar J�"aller Par•k
�� � ���'� � � �, �.�
� ��� : ���
� �� � �
R-4 �� ����� � � �
�,
�"'�` ` :��+� '` ��a;`��" �`,��.,�'` ���+
�r"�` ra ii F �
N�E- �fih�- or � i°�1�6�,� �
E~1'194#� RI
File Name: :\CED�PIanning\GESiG6S_projectslannexations\ ate:
WindstoneV_anneximxdsi3_WindstaneV_renton_zoning.mxd W i n d sto n e V An n exa t i o n
�A.�����r
0 300 600 ���"�t�� ��, ,,.�51T��v
Feet �4
�•��nn N �4, 3 Renton Zoning
Community & Economic Development �'
Alex Pietsch,Administrator �
Adriana Abramovich, Pianning recnn�cian n Annexation Boundary Residential 4 du/ac
�
�� c,Tyaf`"'� ,;�, i_.._City Limits Residential 8 du/ac
� ;c� � ��� ��<' 0 Parcels
;
.a,.� �.:�,,.�..w.� ,,,w.�,�� ,..,.,., t�.„ ,
�
Field p j
�Nc� i
i
'L NE 17th St LL' �
'a a i w
�„ �, j cn
c �
Z �. � 1 �
� �IE=1 J � � L
Q . __ � o
o � � �
U
C6
� A
- r
�
�
4
� W
� �
� �
� �
� � �a .
Q�ar n
�g5a � Mar I'a!lerPark
e,�'�O� /Q Q
�� .r1� L
c� "�� �
�
R-4 ►v r st
�
gE 111th PI
File Name: :\CED\Planning\GIS\GIS_projects\annexations\
WindstoneV_annex\mxds\4_WindstoneV_KC_zoning.mxd Date: 12/08/2011 �/�/i n d sto n e V An n exatio n
0 300 600 . :.,�,�.n ""
Feet .,s,.,:.
,:3,20o N � �� King County Zoning
Community & Economic Development DAnnexation Boundary King County Zoning
Alex Pietsch,Administrator v r �-_'.City Limits R-4 Residential 4DU/AC
Adriana Abramovich, PlanningTechnician II ��� � Parcels Renton Zoning
c' °f � c; Residential - 8 DU/AC
—"—"" ���,��_� �:J�!� ����� " ° � p Residential - 4 DU/AC
F1eld p i P'ri a e Rd
�N�c �
i
u' NE 17th St w �
z :
<D '� °-- � w
�• v' � 1 cn
fl- T �� � >
�, N E=1.6�.h J m � L
�• �-------------- � o
�
� I '1 � �
1 �\
I �\
� �\
I
f�esidential Low'�ensity �
_, i �
�ae� � i �� i
�
� i �� i
w
��, �
> i ,.-' i
Q � i �,, i
�
`�:. � � �' ,
�- .-- '
� � � , .
� � � �ar�a' �w
i �-aa c�
i�\SS °�
�c�e�`�`�� 3�.rQ\ ��
S �G� ��
N 1"3'fh St i
: '
gE 111th PI
File Name: :10ED\Planning\GIS\GIS_projectslannexationsl
WindstoneV_annexlmxds\5_WindstoneV_renton_complan.mxd Date: 12/08/2011 �/�/i n d sto n e V An n exat i o n
0 300 600
� �,:�av�,�
Fee` �� � ��� °�`g°�"` Renton Comprehensive
1:3,200 A�
IV
Community & Economic Development Land Use Designation
Alex Pietsch,Administrator '
Adriana Abramovich, PlanningTechnician II AnneXation BOulldary L811dUS@
c,cyoe � �-_�City Limits 0 Residential Single Family
_._�.rr+v �' �. -y--,�s.
��� �" � �"�,� '�¢�> � � Parcels RLD Residential Low Density
�: m
Field p !
�NF � P'rivate Rd
.
i
Z E 17th � '
� � i
� �, i n
C Y �
Z J m I Q
� �E'1,6th_ � � �
¢ � o
0
� �
U
(B
�
� �
�
� �
W
� � �
Q � �
�t � 1 � �-�
� � ' � ��� �:�,`
a � �
O,�ar� �c�? t� 3�%� - .: � �.
\SC'a '� -.r'�� ��� �� ..
��'�°� � F � �, � �� ����� �
gk.� "�� � � �.; � �°�,
� �-.r ���`� �4 �3: N�;:
�.
z-.. �a,� _;
�
� � � �� �� �
„ : ,
-��`__ <=a
IVE T3f St �
a.
�
SE 111 th PI r�,���
Fiie Name: :10EDiPianninglGlS\GIS_projects\annexationsl
WindstoneV_annex\mxds\6_WindstoneV_KC_complan.mxd Date: 12/08/2011 W i n d sto n e V An n exat i o n
0 305 610 �t ,�'�� _`°`"`
,..'�"'` n Kin Count Com rehensive - Land Use Desi nation
�:s,2oo Feet �` � 9 Y f� J
N � �� '
� QAnnexation Boundary
Community & Economic Development t„�City Limits
Alex Pietsch,Administrator ,, „ � �Parcels
Adriana Abramovich, Planning Technician II � CPLU
��., City of � � um Urban Residential Medium 4-12DU/AC
:�` �
____�_ ;;� ` E"� � �uh Urban Residential High>12 DU/AC
., �,. ,
�` �" � � �'; �� ,`� �.,,, � ��„�
� ��,,. ,,,,,..�,,,;��,,,.�..� �� O ra Rural Residential
��os KC Owned Open Space/Recreation
:
Field p !
/N� j rivate Rd
.
i
:
z E lt t �
a !
a w
v� � 1 �
W � ' �
Z � m � Q
� �.�tl� � � L
Q � . o
�
o g .-
U
;..�� �
t' 1\
\
�t
�/�,�`��`ti �}�
��r`r". �+�� �
+'�� •
l��' i
#¢ � •
.��A'� f � W !
s t�/// �
f{ _ Q � I
l •
���, r f .Y� � ��--. �
i
, �'�', < '` 1.�-- v a
�',�_ _ � �
r�;r;d
Jar
.cn
�O��gSaQ a ;1�1m�Va!!ei'Park
��e� �
S �` �
E 'f3f �
gE 111 th PI
File Name: :\CED1PIanning\GIS\GIS_projects\annexations\ Date:
WindstoneV_annex\mxds\7_WindstoneV_critical_areas.mxd W i n d sto n e V An n exati o n
a��e��,
0 240 480 ��_ ��� �%�� ° a
Feet � � � �������
1:3200 N Critical Areas
Community & Economic Development �Annexation Boundary
r-••�
Alex Pietsch,Administrator �_..�City Limits
Adriana Abramovich, Planning Technician II � � Parcels
r c�tyof , ,,� ;� n � Streams
—_ .C�. ,�'�,� 1 ���l '.�> Ke�, Q �Wetlands
:
Field p �
/�,F � F''riva e Rd
.
i
e
w NE 17t S �
z �
� °- • w
cn a, 1 �
W � ' �
Z a m � �
� ,E�.&tf� � r
¢ � � �
o � .—
ca
�
N W
N �
�
Q a
�t +L--�
� �
`� a
aQ���� v
�O��g`� ¢ ,�1cr}•l�alley�Pnrk
��0� �
S � �
• �
E 'f
SE 111th PI
File Name: :\CED\Pianning\GIS\GIS_projects\annexations\ ate: 1
WindstoneV_annexlmxds\8_WindstoneV_slopes.mxd W i n d sto n e V An n exat i o n
,- As���.,,.
,r
0 300 600eet � ` ` �;� ���'���
1:3200 N `� ' � Slopes & Erosion
\
Community & Economic Development DAnnexation Boundary Slope
r—"'City Limits Percent Range
Alex Pietsch,Administrator �••—�
Adriana Abramovich, Planning Technician II o Parks >15% & <=25%
c;ry of , ;,, ,, � � Parcels >25% & <=40%
—�� r�� � � � '�, m
� �� �
�`,.. . r--' .,, �`", � >40% & <=90%
� .��.__ .� .,,
�>90%
�
NE 19th St - -- ��_ � � '." �.% �. - _
; �� SE 4th St '
�J.,�D h_Pl�.,�,�f� NE 20th PI r.�..""'�" _
� . . . .
, _ `C..�: N a � - ��-�r _ __
__, , _ �— ,, � - __, � ,_ _ _ _ __ ;�:� ;
, �, — , � a� -�� . _ � _
�.
�, --
� - —
. :;� � . , � _ _ _ —
,_ ,_�.�� � a,t�, ; ,
' � �. p� _ >
' Y � •. . 2_ ; ;�. � �.- ',,,...
; w �� ^ SE 105th S� =-m , - \,
��; -
NE 18tfi Ct �; "� z �/ �� ��:�i ��- -;-,� � , � r`
__. � Y , _
� �. � -- m
._, ,
< 1
�� Q —i , . �_. i N -- _
� ' � _ _
, _ ` , �_, ;'.,
4--
� �- ' � —' � � Y � � "m
.
_ ,� � r--.} � - - �
" � ` NE �Z-th,St~ % � �-
, � . � � -
.
. _ . __ , ✓ 1
i ;
�.
�. _ — ti �--_ ___ ; _'
T —I � .. � _ �Z(1 ��, t - � _
. �,,
NE 17th St - � �` � , : e„ �� _ "' z NE,17th St� � u-► �
� •
- --�
�. ,
, ..�. ` � I . ;_
, �
, ',, �,
� �
� _ �
o '
_ � � Q
_ ''3 � .
:
,�
.� 1
�_ __ SU�Se�glvd_. ..,�, _`�„Y , �E�t.._. T o-- I a�'
: �--a
� �"�"N� ' �� ':�� ' - � j �`�.-� ��--`--_ � �-� _� '"-7/ ( �� �
_ � � _ � �_ �� -__ ,' ,
� ;— , w � � i , a i —�....�.� L � ; �
----_____ '
--__.. �
Z __. __,.� t�
...�
✓� \�
� i
. �
, �
� � � � ar •
. �,ry ;
�" _ > , ,. �= aa . � ��.
, � ���- ��; � � �� �� � ` ;'f-- � � �� ���s � �. �
-- - NE;13th PI � � _ �'�o '
• -____-.��
. , � � I �
, , :. ._-- =� �
_ ,__
, . � ,,, � .
; , � .
._ , o _ ___,__�--__ �
z '� .
�_, � �-- C Mnti•�a!!ey Park
`'�'.�'„'"�� �� �'`i--- 1
J ' ^
:r� . __ __
�� .a � �-- ; � �' NE 1�th�t� � _
---
/ �._ � l-
b�'
".. _ � .
: .. � .. 1__..
E 12th Sf ��-
- •
,
A J�E;12th�S -
t
_ ___.
� � �
- --�-�--- . �
� ^ � -- --- __ _
_----- � ' ` ! ^ \ � �, _ -SE__2th S __
I , � ,' � 11 t`
� - �-
_�._w � SE 112th p ' , � -�
� , _._ . ,
� ,�, __. _. �. I
� -- , ;
�����
�z • -- - - � _ � � . „�
._ _ _____----9 � i..,_.._.. -.._� __ ` SE 113th�t_
Q , � � I -�--
_ - -. _- , ?_ � I
- --� �� � _ _ _ . , � _, . �
� Oliver I�1 Hazen H3Ti School NE �1th t �' � r
> � � - � = -- - � -
� �
�-
, ---�
--
- o g � I i � ,
.� �------ -�-; -� '-��� �_ .�E 114th St��. -- _�- ! I
—� � � , �
� SE 114th St `
- -, __.. __ . -
, . , ,
�
, _ < <_... ,
File Name: .\CED1PIanning\GIS\GIS_projects\annexations\ ate: 2 W i n d sto n e V An n exati o n
WindstoneV annex\mxdsi10_WindstoneV_vicinity_for_council.mxd „
p 750 W . �a;
1,50eet �,,w,f% ".4. c."' . SChOOIS Oc Pc�rkS
1:7500 �., :;� ,
Community & Economic Development �Annexation Boundary
Alex Pietsch,Administrator � N
Adriana Abramovich, Planning Technician II � SChOOIS
� c�tyof , , t , 1 � �� �_;:;City Limits
.
— --,..�'''.+ f�, ��� ���� ',�� ... � �,�," � Parcels