The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA17-000066_Report 1--------Renton® NOTICE OF APPLICATION A Ma stet App_licallon has been flied and accepted with the Department of Comm uni · ~~:?,-A;;;;;:~.Division of the Clty of Renton. TIie i1ng briefly describes the a~~r:~,:~ 0 :: ~h::~o!::~ DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: FebruRy,f. 2()17 PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: KAR S1ngk, Family Se!b~ck VJr,Jncc / LUA 1/·000UH7. V-A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The ~pplicant is re u m -, ' proposed restoration of a fire-dama~~d nonconf . 1 1 j es_t Gan Adm1111stratlve Zon,ns se1back Variance for 662U001601-The e,i,fmg home was d;maged b;;:i:"!:,:gt~a~:~~ h~:e located ~ 1 10321 SE 190th PL (Ta~ Parcel no. requirements The proJect site totals 7 535 sq ~ f . 1 . V ago, and Is therefore subJect to curreni code s,te 1s from a resldemial dri~eway exte,ndjng f~o,:7 S~~~;1~';t:nd 1 1:_io~ed Rcsldential-4 (R-4). Existing ~cccss to the req~sting a setback variance for the front yard setback and 1h o er ,c;i areas arc mapped on ,•te The Jpphca'lt IS yard s,itback •s 30·feet and the required side rd b k e eost and wc,t s,de yard setbacks. The requited front side. The,; llcant Is ' . ya •et de_ ''. a combined 20-feet with no less than 7.5 fo~t on e,thcr setbadc ro:~th the ::~uae:.~1~e:~~,;ev:~~!t 28-foot {ex1stmgJ front yard setb<Kk and a 5-foot (e~isting) side y~rd PROl£CT LOCATION: 10321 S( 190"' Pl. Renton, WA 980SS-6611 PERMITS/REVIEW REQUESTED: VJriJncc -Administrative APPllCANT/PROlECT CONTACT PERSON Cam,e Ng. C,mtact IApplicsmt & Contact) 455187'' Ave Sl, l\llerccr lslund, WA 98040 Comments on tl>e abowe application must be submitted in wrilin O A I Community & Economic Development 1055 Sou!h Grad W : t r,ge ea Welhs, Associate Planner, Department of you have quest,ons about this proposal or wish to b m : ay, enton, WA 98057, by 5:00 p.m. on March 9, 2011. If please ccntact the Project Manager. A~yone who su:mi~s :;1 p.irty cf record and receive add,t1onal Information by m.i,I, and will be notified of any dec;is,on en this proJe<:t !ten comm~'"ltl will automatically become a party of record PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJ£CT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION OATE OF APPLICATION; NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION; If you would like to be made a pnrty cf record to receive further inform n form and return 1o. C,ty of Rento'1 CED Pl D , atro on this proposed project. complNe th,s ' ' ann,ng rv<s1on, 10SS 5crouth Grady Woy, Renton, W/1 98 a 57 Fi!e Name/ illo KAR Sin~!e Fam,ly Setbac~ Variance I lUA 17-000087, V-A NIIMl: ------- MAILING ADDRES~ ______________ CITV/Slflll/ll~ TFlEPHONE NO AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, dhj.1./~,-.. W-< • 65 , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted in __L_ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on Signed:-+(:~/'""'··~=·~=.:c....:i.:. 1 ~(,._./'--""'i!=~._..tA.,"""'--_ Date:_-1-/ /_·_-z.._i...,.J_z_o_/ 7-'---__ _ I f STATE OF WASHINGTON ss I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that JI ,1Jtlu, Unit', signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. COUNTY OF KING Dated: Notary Publiain t1u1_·1 • Notary (Print) : _ __;~'-'-'-'' '-1-I j'-4----'t'.wi'-", ,..,. ''"'e::,;./;,__[ ___ .;.:,,.___:.- M y a p poi ntm en t expires : _ _,;.43_i:o~· .., . .,_, .i.±__;·;)~~c,.....1i!:..' .:_tl_,{T'---_..JZ,,.:,,.....-i~ CITY OF RENTON I i DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT r PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING i On the 24th day of February, 2017 I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing 12 ERC Agency Letters and attachments. This information was sent to: ~~--.. -"~""""-~si...~ , 1tJ11(1 -... ,--.... ~ = -~J~: [._ ~::---. ,,~~ :qQ(.:v-1n~fi1j _. ~-· ·-, ,- --...... -, .. --· Agencies See Attached List Angie Mathias Contact City of Renton Applicant / ' ~ Signature of Sender): ,/1,l~-/A.'1 ,,f ,._...--, - s TATE OF WASHINGT COUNTY OF KING ) ) ss ) u I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SabFiRa Micaate &, [\, ur, 5!J fhS:.c:J\ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ,''"y\\lp\\1111 1 o\..'-o.~''' -0 *''" I ,-: ..,,,..._ffl Dated: ~ ... ..:-" ,~ '/,, .,. '.( <) Neta ry (Print) : ___ ___..==+-----'\_,C.:...'" =' ~c,·· i.:...· '---------~'-'r'<&-o4--,,_.,,t!:-.;.. My appointment expires: - ....;.D_tl_Cl<._e-_,_f-_12-'----G-r&v: __ PL.......C-lr.:....._ ________ ----1 LUfJ 17-0DW~(.p affidavit of service by mailing ' ERC Determination Agency Mailing Mailing Date: 2-24-17 Project#: LU Al 7-000066 Docket 12 -Group A (non-project) To: Larry Fisher, wdfw Karen Walter, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries, Division Habitat Program Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, King Area Dev. Services Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers Shirley Marroquin, KC Wastewater Treatment Division Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Department of Ecology Washington Department of Natural Resources Doug Corbin, Puget Sound Energy King County Department of Permitting & Environmental Review Charlene Anderson, City of Kent Tim McHarg, City of Newcastle Jack Pace, City of Tukwila Gary Kreidt, Metro Transit Jalaine Madura, Seattle Public Utilities February 24, 2017 City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chi p"Vi n cent, Administrator SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAi THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Docket 12-Group A, LUA17-000066, ECF Dear City of Renton: This Jetter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review ofthe subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision for more details. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 10, 2017 together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any further questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-6576. For th)Environmental Review Committee, / ' 2:r-· ~ Angi;·Ma~ias Long Range Planning Manager Enclosure Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Ch ip"Vincent, Administrator February 24, 2017 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPAi THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on February 20, 2017: SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) PROJECT NAME: Docket 12 -Group A PROJECT NUMBER: LUA17-000066 Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 10, 2017, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Please refer to the enclosed Notice of Environmental Determination for complete details. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-6576. For the Environmental Review Committee, f __ 7~ -_(:.· --:":::,,,. Angie Mathias Long Range Planning Manager Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Boyd Powers, Department of Natural Resources Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Gretchen Kaehler, Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Larry Fisher, WDFW Duwamish Tribal Office US Army Corp. of Engineers DEPARTMENT OF COMMl TY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DA TE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant: Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Summary: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area SF: Site Area: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: February 20, 2017 Docket 12 -Group A City of Renton City of Renton Angie Mathias, Long Range Planning Manager; Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner; Paul Hintz, Senior Planner; Angelea Weihs, Associate Planner LUA 17-000066, ECF Angie Mathias, Long Range Planning Manager The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for new and revised regulations/standards to allow pet daycares, clarify the role and responsibilities of the Arts Commission, place the CN zone in a design district and allow commercial uses along S 4th St, clarify and refine approval criteria for Routine Vegetation Management Permits, to allow projections into rear setbacks for awnings, rain barrels, etc., and to implement Administrative Code Interpretations already approved. These regulations would be citywide. Citywide N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): N/ A Proposed New Bldg. Area (grass): N/A N/A Total Building Area GSF: N/A Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). ERC Report RMC Title IV Docket 1266 City of Renton Department of Commu & Economic Development DOCKET #12 -GROUP A ironmental Review Committee Report LUA 17-000066, ECF Report of February 20, 2017 Page 2 of4 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ BACKGROUND Dl28 Pet Daycare. Allow "Doggy daycare" facilities in commercial areas with specific mitigation. D129 Arts Commission Regulations. Clarify roles and responsibilities related to Renton Municipal Arts Commission. D130 Light Intensity Commercial. Add the Commercial Neighborhood zone to Design District D to ensure new development has high quality design for pedestrians and environment. Also, allow commercial uses, such as offices, in the R-14 zone along South 4th Street. Dl31 Routine Vegetation Management Permit Criteria. Amend review criteria for a tree removal permit within the Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations to consolidate four critical areas criteria into one and to address other regulations, such as tree density and landscaping regulations. D132 Projections into Setbacks. Allow porch awnings, pergolas, rain barrels, etc. to extend into rear yards. D-126 Administrative Code Interpretations: Administrative Code Interpretations are anticipated to be adopted. These interpretations include: • Reinstating a provision that was inadvertently removed regarding front and side yard along a street setbacks for detached accessory structures in residential zones. • Allowing for a SEPA exemption for the construction of new single family houses or additions to houses situated on land with critical areas. The newly adopted critical areas regulations and shoreline regulations provide sufficient environmental protections for infill projects. • Allowing on-line retail storage lockers outside retail stores in the CN, CV, CA, CD, and CO zones. No more than two "retail" units permitted outside a store, the maximum combined width of the two units should be no more than 12 feet, the unit shall not block any openings (windows and doors), and the unit shall not impede ADA accessibility. • Resolution of a conflict: although Tier 1 Temporary Use Permits (TUP) are intended to permit uses allowed by the base zone, model homes are listed as a Tier 2 TUP even though single-family homes are permitted by zoning (they're converted into a home after most or all houses in a subdivision are purchased). • Clarification that notice of a Hearing Examiner public hearing should be similar to the notices provided to inform the public that the Administrator will be rendering a decision by replacing the posting of notices on site with posting of notice on the City's webpage. • Resolution of a conflict by not requiring development in the RMF zone to abide by tree density standards. • Allowing easements, rather than requiring tracts, for projects that do not include the subdivision of land. • Requiring legal descriptions of each existing and proposed lot for proposed lot line adjustments. • Clarification that alleys are not required in newly created R6 zone. • Clarification that outdoor storage is a permitted primary use in the Employment Area land use designation. • Clarification regarding the process, criteria, and fee amount for a Critical Areas Permit. • Amendments regarding residential building height, including addition of a definition of "attic," increasing the maximum wall plate height in the R-14 zone to 32' through a Conditional Use Permit, and allowing deck railings above the maximum wall plate height to be flush with the fa~ade if the railings are at least SO% transparent. ERC Report 16-000057 City of Renton Department of Comm DOCKET #11 -GROUP A & Economic Development ironmental Review Committee Report LUA 17-000066, ECF Report of February 20, 2017 Page 3 of4 • Clarification regarding the minimum standards for varying lot width, lot area, front and rear yard setbacks, and confirmation that the requirements only apply to lots in preliminary plats (subdivisions of ten or more lots). • Clarification that all R-6 standards are applicable to Small Lot Cluster Development, but RMC 4-2-llOD.34 does not apply. • Establishment of a flat $5,000 fee for all franchise fees. • Resolution of a conflict by confirming that a Conditional Use Permit is required in order to establish commercial uses in the R-14 zone. • Allowance for corner lots to instead have two front yard setbacks and two side yard setbacks (instead of a side yard setback and a rear yard setback). • Requiring an eight foot landscaping strip to be located between a shared driveway and abutting properties that are not part of the subdivision. • Allowing internal directional and wayfinding signs for major institutions to direct vehicular and pedestrian traffic. • Prohibiting above ground drainage facilities to be counted towards common open space requirements, establishes a maximum slope of 5% for common open space, and prohibits obstructions (e.g., fences and retaining walls) from being within the common open space. • Granting protection of off-site trees when branches extend into a property under construction. • Requiring five-year landscaping maintenance and performance sureties. • Exemption for airplane manufacturing and changes of use only requiring interior tenant improvements from the requirement of site plan review. • Allowing PUDs to vary the prescribed dimensional standards for private open space if the area requirement is still met. • Refinement and expansion of options for attached garages by providing two new options to meet design standards. • Eliminating design standards that require a pitched roof as they are no longer necessary. • Eliminating a date included in the definition of "Rate Study." • Reinstating of approval criteria that was inadvertently deleted with a pervious ordinance. I PARnWO, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: B. Mitigation Measures None. C. Exhibits None. D. Environmental Impacts Issue a DNS with a 14-day Appeal Period. There are no environmental impacts that are anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposal. ERC Report 16-000057 City of Renton Deportment of Comm DOCKET #12 -GROUP A Report of February 20, 2017 & Economic Development E. Comments of Reviewing Departments ironmentaJ Review Committee Report WA 17-000066, £CF Page 4 of 4 The proposal will be circulated to City Department Division Reviewers and appropriate agencies. All substantive comments will be provided to the Responsible Officials for their consideration and possible recommendation that the comments be incorporated as "Advisory Notes to Applicant." Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Comments and Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, March 10, 2017. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with the required fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall -7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. ERC Report 16-000057 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) PROJECT NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: LUA17-000066, ECF City of Renton 2017 RMC Title IV Docket 12, Group A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 2017 RMC Title IV Docket 12 Group A includes the following items: #0-128 Pet Daycare; #0-129 Renton Municipal Arts Commission; #0-130 Low Intensity Commercial; #D-131 Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations; #0-132 Projections into Setbacks; and #D-133 Administrative Code Interpretations. PROJECT LOCATION: Citywide LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Environmental Review Committee Department of Community & Economic Development The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on March 10, 2017. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and more information may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: / / .'/ . ~' ~~' ~ / / .,·~--~ '/1J(l..Kettyeyme7,Mrninistrator Community Services Department February 24, 2017 February 20, 2017 .,--·;~- ... -,/ /;;>e-. ·-.... -... 2 I to LI?--~::,/ -~ -·· ·· · Date ' /Rick M: Marshall, Administrator Fire & Emergency Services I (' \ . -. 1/UJ/2017 c.~ 0. t- Date C.E. "Chip" Vincent, Administrator Department of Community & Economic Development Z (z.o( It- Date • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) II M~•tcr A))oiic~ti<III h,5 been f,\i,d and ~<'<>pied with the OtpnrtmN,I ol Comrnunif'i' & E<<>n<>mi~ Oevtlopment (CED)-f1a1min1 o;vi~i~n ot lhe C,ty <>f Renton. Tht lollowi"I bMny d1's.tfib,e<, !hi" ~pplicath>n~nd th!!" nli"C~''"'Y Publ;cApprov~ls. OATE OF NOTICE OF J\PP\JCA.TICN: D"'""'b~c 13, 2016 UIN!'.l USE NUW.E!Hl: l!.!Al5·0GCr.l5S, ECF, SH?L·A PROJECT NAME: PROJECT OE.SCRJP'TION· Tr.r. aµpl;cant ;5 requ~•t,ng a 9-!ct ih<>ct ~lat located ,it lfi.4B &. 1Gt51 ll1"' ,'wenu~ Sf. The >UbJet.~ ~roparti"' cumbiPC~ ccmp,;s,: of 7~."IW ,,iuar~ feet il.83 a'<CI in 1i1e ao,~ o<t l,x~t~,:i !nth~ R· & """" l<Jl ,,,r.1 w,11 r3ngu [rem S,s,s Sf tc 7, tl9 Sf ,n s,ie. Al\ .,,.;,ti~ $11\,uu,e.5 w,IT ~e re mooed ~, ?"rt cf thi, ds¥elopm~nt. CritP:al ¥~a, ,.,,1 off-ft~ w;!~ , i,ortion ,;,I a stream b\;tf~r P<IQMin~ on\U the we~tcrly pc11,o~ of the ,u~ji,c1 pr<:pmty Ali e~;st;ng t,e~, outside ire tri1ici, are; butler a,c propo,m:l to b~ removed; replanting wiM oc,:ur ~, p•rt or !he devclo11me~t. Tne dca,nage 11lar, 11,~µo..c, ~ det~r.t,oo ~nd "'~t" qu,iity trn~l,M"t vJull oo the southeort ,omer of the <om Acee,, to ~II ;,,o;,osed lo:, .. m ~ l,cm; oewf\, propoJt'd <>ght--r,1-wny thro~gh tM center o! lh~ s;l•· frontog~ im.oro,.,_,m~nt, w'II be ,nstailed w,tbi~ tl,e ""'ting righ:-of·w~y o~ 111th Jli·,eo~~ S[. PROJECT LOCATION: J64H/1&45l· 111"'· A"" 5f, Runt<>n WA <JBOSS 01'1/0NAL O(HIIMINATION Of NON·S)GNl~ICANCE (CNSI, A. the L~•~ Ag~~(."Y. lhP C•t',' of P.enlor ~~• do:ennhc,J that l<E<'ificJot 1.'nv,rnn,~,,mia! implct! ar~ unlikPiV rn '""'!! f,r,m re~ pr<Jp:,~ed project The,efom. a1 t~r;,,iu~d ~nder ,1,,, ~CW ~J 21C.ll0. t•e C>!), ol ~untvn ,; ~;in,: the Optional ONS p,c,e,s 10 give n~tice th~t a CNS" U,aly t" be """d. Com,,wnl p~,,cd, ro, lhP ~rojec: J<ld './lE p,09,,.~·J DN~ ar,• ir>tPgraTRd ir,to J s,,,gle ccmm~nt p,1n~d Th~re will !H. r,u :~mrr:ent pe"<cd foHov,·,,,g ihl:" is1~~nte of :he Threshold Cut~rrnin~uo<l of Non-S;gn,ficanc~ /CNS). 'h,; ,n,1v be the ,miy opporN~'tr '" commP.St c" lh~ .mwoorn.c~tcl ,m1,acts nf th~ µ,opn._.l A 14 day 1pp~al p~riod w,11 fol\Ow th" ;,,,,rn,,~n o! ttie ONS PEIIMlT APPUCAflON DA1!:: Nonn Of COMPlHf AP~llCATION· Ai>PUCA"IT/PROJFCT CONT;).CT !'£~SON: l'ermit>/Re~iew R~que,ted, M;11~ 'i']eL•k / Tiger Mcun!~;n Conslruct":,n/1$H3 Mini,;,, W•y NE/ Ou...311, WA !i8Cl9/ 41S .. J1~-4061/ ma,kseelo.l@yaho.>.com Short Pl~t. En•iroomentill (~tl>.lo) b•;~w 8uildinc PNm;1, Ccn5uurtlon P~rmlt )1 you wouic l,i<~ to h~ m;><!~ a ;),lfT! ol ''°"'d lo re,~,v~ !urtO.er irformwon on th'5 pret1><1ied 1><oj~,;1. ~o,..plete th;s fo,m !"d rr.1~rn t<:> C',ty of R~'!!o~, Cl:D -~<Mri•,g Cw,~ion 10~-; So. G,~d¥ WJy, R~rt~~, WA. 950S"/. HUPHON( NO lJJc~Uon wh~.re applic~tlo" m;iy h~revie-wL'<I. PUBUC HEARING CDl'ISISHNC'I' OVERVl£W: loninr./l,md Use: E"vi1onmMU! D<>~manu lhat halua111. ~ Pr<>pi,s~d Proj11.c!· Arbor~1 Report, Geoteehni,~ R~p<>rt, Cr,li~nl Altai; Studv, Tt(hnkal lnformJtic>n r't~po,t D~pn_nm~M ot Communily t. Eccnomic Oeve!o,im<101 ICEO! -PlaMing o,.;,.on, S.:rth floor Ro,,ton c:,ty Hal:. l055 Soull'I GrJdy W~y, R~nlun, WA 980S7 The ~ub;«:t sit~ JS ,fo,,s-~•t"d !.~.<1d!!nli~I Mfdiur, o .. n,ity (IIMDJ on 1h (,ty uf RM\011 CcmorQ~~r.,,,,e l..:!N! l/U" Map J~d Residtntial-1 (!Hi) <Ofi 1h, C,ty", lar.,·,t Map fo~ P'"lect wili i;,e S\.'b1~ct lC lhe City's SU.\ cr,!;"anc,,, RMC4·1·UOJ\; 4-4; 4. ~-il60; 4·1; 4"9 o,,,i oth~r Jpp!,.•bl,· Lo:!e, and ,~~Lll~!sol\, ;,, nopropfi3t~ C~''.":''tnU en th, above •pphcation mun be •~bmitte<f in w1~<n, co Mena Davi•/ S~nior PlaMer, CHl -pf,)Ming 01~11,".". IO~S .south Grady Wa1. ~~nta~ .. Wi>. ~80~7, bv S:00 ~Mon Ja'lU~I)' 6, 2~17. •fw,, ha,ve Q~Cst,cns abo•.t th,; µrcpo,al, or ,, .. .,t, to _be m~<le. a P¥_'=Y af r~,:ord and r(!'r.·,~ add,t,~POi ir.formatic11 h;-.-,..~,!. ~ea,~ co~!~LI th~ prcjecl m,mage, .. A~.yo!'I<'_ wno iubrn,:i wna~o comn,eot, ,.,,:1 ~~ionat;,a:lr be,un,~" Dart, cl ,~cnrd ~~d .,,.;ii be n,atifid <>l "~V d~c,s,o~ on th,; pro1~c\. CONTACT PERSON: Mona Davis, Senior Planner; Tel; (425) 430-7246; Email: md_avis_@rentonw~-~KQI,' ------It"enton ® CERTIFICATION I, '-fJlu;yza._ ,,)jttd)(:5 , hereby certify that / copies of the above document were posted in _L conspicuous places or nearby the described property on "' Signed: (}Jwna. ~, Date:._µ/2,<.J_-_,a"'--'--"'-?--~/ Ip"'---- STATE OF WASHINGTON 55 COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Yflao<J 12 o ,1 ~> signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be.hts@'..thetffree and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 11cc.. µ;...tq,,11 3 ::w1& . ::ty;::, I 1} ,,\\\llHi Q I; >.HSS1<j1 tr1 '!.... 'l " .... l'f., 't, -,?., /. . "10~ ~~ ~'l , " 11111 ';'& :;o 1 ~.'otary (Print): 11 \ 'f ·" C ' , --< -~ (J) ':;. __ __.xs..,_,·;p._,,\~s~· _:\...u,l;l'--'Y)""-) "-"#7'-'----- -i ~ "O '\,. »:: ,. n t cP V f:!l ~ . A 0 \ '.?;tic .f M-g a p poi n tm en t exp I res : __ _;;.:i.Y:-::.,;:iii..,.1,ys.:;Sc..:\,._·· _..,J'.l.,. ..... ·· Lft-"";1"'-Q'-C· \---J..__ __ _ '"~ 11~,, ""17 "!-,.;:-= <s. t-p 1hnw.\"'''~ O~ .::: 11,, "ISHtNG-<; .$ 'ill, ,_..,, .... :-, Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chi p"Vi ncent, Administrator OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Docket 12 -Group A PROJECT NUMBER: LUA17-000066 LOCATION: Citywide DESCRIPTION: 2017 RMC Title IV Docket 12 Group A includes the following items:·#D-128 Pet Daycare; #D-129 Renton Municipal Arts Commission; #D-130 Low Intensity Commercial; #D-131 Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations; #D-132 Projections into Setbacks; and #D-133 Administrative Code Interpretations. the applicant is requesting environmental (sepa) review for new and revised regulations/standards to allow pet daycares, clarify the role and responsibilities of the arts commission, place the en zone in a design district and allow commercial uses along s 4th st, clarify and refine approval criteria for routine vegetation manamagment permits, to allow projections into rear setbacks for awnings, rain barrels, etc., and to implement administrative code interpretations already approved. these regulations would be citywide. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before S:00 p.m. on March 10, 2017, together with the required fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of RMC 4-8-110 and information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (42S) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. LUAl1 -ODOo~~ City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Docket 12 -Group A (Pet Daycare, Arts Commission NAME: N/A Regulations, Low Intensity Commercial, Routine Vegetation Management Permits. Projections into Setbacks, Code Interpretations) ADDRESS: N/A PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: Cit•IIAlide PARCEL NUMBER: CITY: N/A ZIP: N/A Citywide APPLICANT (if other than owner) EXISTING LAND USE(S): ) NAME: City of Renton Many land uses, including: vacant, single-family, multi- family, commercial, office, industrial, etc. COMPANY (if applicable): CED PROPOSED LAND USE(S): n/a ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Citywide CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98057 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if aoolicable) n!a TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-7200 EXISTING ZONING: Citywide CONT ACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (ii applicable): nla NAME: Chip Vincent SITE AREA (in square feet): 23. 79 square miles Planning Division -SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE COMPANY (ii applicable): Department of Community DEDICATED: NIA and Economic Development SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way NIA CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98057 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): nla TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS: (425) 430-6575 amathias@rentonwa.gov NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NIA NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): NIA -1-06/09 PRcAcT INFORMATION (continul) ~-~----~~----------~ NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): nla SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): NIA NET FLOOR AREA ON NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): NIA PROJECT VALUE: NIA IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): n/a D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA ONE D AQUIFIER PROTECTION AREA TWO D FLOOD HAZARD AREA D GEOLOGIC HAZARD D HABITAT CONSERVATION NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW D SHORELINE STREAMS & LAKES D WETLANDS ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ sq.ft. ___ lin.ft. ___ sq.ft. PROJECT (if applicable): NIA LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal descriotion on separate sheet with the followina information included) SITUATE IN THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION ~ TOWNSHIP 23N , RANGE 5 . IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Environmental Review 3. 2. 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) Chip Vincent , declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that I am (please check one) __ the current owner of the property involved in this application or _X_ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attachtroof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in respects true and car ct to the best of my knowledge and belief. '\ '\, ; 2 (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that~~~-~- signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. My appointment expires: _______ _ -2 -06109 PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Planning Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST; The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. -1 -06/09 H:\CED\Planning\Tit!e IV\Docket\Docket Group 12\SEPA -Group A\envchlst -Docket 12A.docx USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Docket 12 -Group A (0128: Pet Daycare, 0129 Arts Commission Regulations, 0130 Low Intensity Commercial, 0131 Routine Vegetation Management Permit Criteria, 0132 Projections into Setbacks, 0133 Administrative Code Interpretations 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Paul Hintz: 0128, 0132 and 0133; Elizabeth Higgins: 0129, Angie Mathias: 0130, Ange/ea Weihs: 0131. 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, 425-430-6575, phintz@rentonwa.gov, ehiqqins@rentonwa.gov, amathias@rentonwa.gov, and oweihs@rentonwo.gov. 4. Date checklist prepared: January 31, 2017 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): NIA 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. N/A 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. N/A 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. N/A 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. N/A 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. It is anticipated that city code will be amended to: 0128 Pet Daycare. Allow "Doggy daycare" facilities in commercial areas with specific mitigation. 0129 Arts Commission Regulations. Review and clarify roles and responsibilities related to Renton Municipal Arts Commission. 0130 Light Intensity Commercial. Add the Commercial Neighborhood zone to Design District D to ensure new development has high quality design far pedestrians and . 2. environment. Also, allow commercial uses, such os offices, in the R-14 zone along South 5th Street. 0131 Routine Vegetation Management Permit Criteria. The review criteria for a tree removal permit (RMC 4-4-130H.5) within the Tree Retention ond Land Clearing Regulations redundantly requires that the project complies with critical areas related regulations with 4 different criteria. The tree removal criteria do not address other regulations that ore critical for tree removal review, such as tree density and landscaping regulations. 0132 Projections into Setbacks. Allow porch awnings, pergolas, rain barrels, etc. to extend into rear yards. 0133 Administrative Code Interpretations. C/-79 -Applicable Front and Side Yard Along o Street Setbacks to Detached Accessory Structures in Residential Zones: reinstates a provision that was inadvertently removed from Title IV. Cl-80 -SEPA Exemption for Single Family Residential Construction: exempts the construction of new single family houses or additions to houses situated on land with critical areas (e.g., protected slopes, very high landslide hazard areas, wetlands, 100 year floodway, and streams ond lakes) from environmental (SEPA) review. The newly adopted critical areas regulations (ORD. 5757) and shoreline regulations (ORD. 5633) provide sufficient environmental protections for infill projects. C/-81 -Outdoor Retail Vending and Storage Lockers for Package Pick-up: Allows on-line retail storage lockers outside of retail stores in commercial zones, in the CN, CV, CA, CD, and CO zones. No more than two "retail" units permitted outside a store, the maximum combined width of the two units should be no more than 12 feet, the unit shall not block any openings (windows and doors), and the unit shall not impede ADA accessibility. C/-82 -Rescinded. Cl-83 Modification of Procedure to Allow for Model Homes in Subdivisions: C/-83 resolves a conflict: although Tier 1 Temporary Use Permits (TUP) are intended to permit uses allowed by the base zone, model homes are listed as a Tier 2 TUP even though single-family homes are permitted by zoning (they're converted into a home after most or all houses in a subdivision are purchased). C/-84 -Public Notice for Hearing Examiner Hearings: clarified that notice of a Hearing Examiner public hearing should be similar to the notices provided to inform the public that the Administrator will be rendering a decision by replacing the posting of notices on site with posting of notice on the City's webpage. C/- 85 -Tree Density for the RMF: resolved a conflict by not requiring development in the RMF zone to abide by tree density standards. C/-86 -Easements as Substitutions for Tracts: If Title IV of Renton Municipal Cade requires the creation of a tract when an application for land development does not propose the division of land, an easement shall suffice for the tract. C/-87 -Legal Descriptions for Lot Line Adjustments: For the purpose of reviewing a proposed lot line adjustment, the legal descriptions of proposed lots are necessary. Lot Line Adjustment shall be required to provide the legal description of each existing and proposed lot. C/-88 -Required Alley Access: clarified alleys are not required in newly created R6 zone. C/-89 -Outdoor Storage: clarifies that outdoor storage is a permitted primary use in the Employment Area land use designation. C/-90 - Critical Area Permit Implementation: clarifies the process, criteria, and fee amount for a Critical Areas Permit. C/-91 -Modifications of Residential Building Height Standards: adds a definition of "attic," allows the maximum wall plate height to be increased in the R-14 zone to 32' through a Conditional Use Permit, and allows deck railings located above the maximum waif plate height to be flush with the fai;ade if the railings are at least 50% transparent. Cl-92 -Residential Zone Lot Configuration Requirements and Dimensional Standards Averaging: clarifies the minimum standards for varying lot width, lot area, front and rear yard setbacks, and confirms that the requirements only apply to lots in preliminary plats (subdivisions of ten or more lots). C/-93 -Modification of Development Standards in the R-4 zone for Small Lot Cluster Developments: clarifies that all R-6 standards would be applicable to Small Lot Cluster Development, but RMC 4-2- . 3. 1100.34 does not apply. C/-94 -Application Fee for Franchises: establishes a flot fee of $5,000 for all franchise fees. Cl-95 -On-and Off-site Services in the R-14 Zone: reconciles o conflict by confirming that a Conditional Use Permit is required in order to establish commercial uses in the R-14 zone. C/-96 -Modification of Development Standards in residential zones for Single Family Residential ond Residential Multi-family Corner Lots: allows corner lots to instead hove two front yard setbacks and two side yard setbacks (instead of a side yard setback and a rear yard setback. C/-97 -Shared Driveway Landscaping: requires an eight foot landscaping strip ta be located between a shared driveway and abutting properties that are not part of the subdivision. C/-98 - Signage far Multi-Family Complexes: Allows internal directional and wayfinding signs for major institutions to direct vehicular and pedestrian traffic. C/-99 -Common Open Space Requirements in the R-10 and R-14 Zones: Prohibits above ground drainage facilities to be counted towards common open space requirements, establishes a maximum slope of 5% Jar common open space, and prohibits obstructions (e.g., fences and retaining walls) from being within the common open space. C/-100 -Offsite Tree Protection Measures During Construction: Grants protection of off-site trees whose branches extend into a property under construction. C/-101 Landscaping Sureties: Requires five-year londscoping maintenance and performance sureties. Cl-102 -Site Plan Review Requirements: Exempts airplane manufacturing and changes of use only requiring interior tenant improvements from the requirement of site plan review. C/-103 -Open Space Requirements for Planned Urban Developments: Allows PUDs to vary the prescribed dimensional standards for private open space if the area requirement is still met. Cl-104 -Recessed Garage and Primary Entry: Refines and expands options for attached garages by providing two new options to meet design standards. C/-105 -Roof Pitch Design: eliminates design standards that require a pitched roof as they are no longer necessary. C/-106 -Definition of Rate Study: Eliminates a date included in the definition of "Rate Study."C/-107-Live Work Units: Reinstates approval criteria that was inadvertently deleted with a pervious ordinance. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. These regulations would be citywide. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other N/A, non-project action. The City of Renton has areas of steep slopes, some hills, and a plateau, but also includes a valley area. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) N/A, nan- project action. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. N/A, non-project action -4 - d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NIA-non-project action. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NIA-non-project action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NIA-non-project action. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NIA-non-project action. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: NI A-non-project action. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. NIA-nan-project action. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NIA-non-project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NIA-non-project action. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NIA-non-project action. The City of Renton has a significant amount of shoreline along both Lake Washington and the Cedar River. There are also wetlands located in many locations throughout the city. All land use applications will be reviewed and analyzed for potential impacts at the time af application. if appropriate, project specific impacts will be addressed and mitigated. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NIA-This is a non-project action. All land use applications will be reviewed ond analyzed for potential impacts at the time of application. If appropriate, project specific impacts will be addressed and mitigated. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NIA-non-project action. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NIA-non-project action. . 5. S) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. N/A-non-project action. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. N/A-non- project action. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A- non-project action. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A-non-project action. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. N/A-non-project action. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N/A-non-project action. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A-non-project action. if appropriate, project specific impacts will be addressed and mitigated. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _X_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _X_ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _X_ shrubs _X_ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain _X_ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? N/A-non- project action. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N/A- non-project action. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N/A-non-project action. -6 - 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: other -----'---->--==:..--------= _ _., --------- Mammal~ear, elk, ~other _________ _ Fish: bass~, ~erring, shellfish, other ______ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. N/A- non-project action. The Cedar River is populated by salmon and includes spawning grounds. There are also other creeks and rivers within the City that contain salmon and include spawning grounds. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. N/A-non-project action. The Cedar River is populated by salmon and includes spawning grounds. There are also other creeks and rivers within the City that contain salmon and include spawning grounds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A-non-project action. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A-non-project action. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N/A-non-project action. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/A-non-project action. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. N/A-non-project action. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A-non-project action. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A-non-project action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? NIA-non-project action. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, -7 - operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. N/A- non-project action. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N/A-non-project action. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? N/A-non-project action. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. N/A-non-project action. c. Describe any structures on the site. N/A-non project action. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A-non project action. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? N/A-non-project action. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? N/A-non- project action. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A non-project action. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. N/A, non-project action. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? N/A-non-project action. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? N/A- non-project action. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NIA-non- project action. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A-non-project action. If appropriate, project specific compatibility with existing and projected land uses and plans will be addressed and mitigated. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A-non-project action. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A-non-project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A-non- project action. 10. AESTHETICS • B • a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. N/A-non-project action. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NIA-nan- project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A-non- project action. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? N/A-non-project action. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A-non-project action. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/A- non-project action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/A- non-project action. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A-nan-project action. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. N/A-non-project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A- non-project action. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. N/A, nan-project action. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A, non- project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A, non-project action. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. N/A, nan-project action. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? N/A, non-project action. -9 - c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A-non-project action. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? N/A-non-project action. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NIA-non-project action. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. N/A-non-project action. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A- non-project action. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. N/A-non-project action. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A-non-project action. 16. UTILITIES a. b. Circle utilities current! available at the site. ctricity, natural gas, water, refu rv1ce, telephone, sanitary sewe eptic system, ot er. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. N/A-non project action. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. ~ Proponent Signature: _...!.c __ 7c:;;·:;::r:.._, _\lLJ ....'.:'"-=-:::==sr='~:::'._-. Name Printed: C.E Date: . 10. D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and ro rams. You do not need to fill out these sheets for ro·ect actions. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed regulations will likely not increase, release, produce, or facilitate the storage of hazardous substances, noise, and discharges or emissions into water or air. Animal feces from pet daycares will be required to be properly managed (including straining any solid material) to ensure that it does not discharge into water. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Mitigation will be determined at the time of a project-specific proposal. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed regulations are not likely to adversely affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: N/A for the proposal. Mitigation would be determined at the time of a project-specific proposal. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed regulations are not likely to deplete energy or natural resources. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Mitigation would be determined at the time of a specific project proposal. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? The proposed regulations will likely not have a detrimental effect on environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated for governmental protection. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Mitigation would be determined at the time of a specific project proposal. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? · 11 · The proposed regulations wi/1 /ikely have na effect on shoreline use. Any effects on land use will be compatible with existing plans. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Mitigation would be determined at the time of a specific project proposal. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The proposed regulations wi/1 /ikely have no significant effect on transportation or public services and utilities. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Mitigation would be determined at the time of a specific project proposal. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflicts have been identified. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true, correct, and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent Signature: Name Printed: Date: -12 -