Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA88-090 7 r I;'. rRD Diu i � i �� �`'�' R-072-87 1I3t i;ri CI.11R1i V.HIGIPAL BIDG. flr(iiiiil,11A$ 155 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, JAMES DALPAY IS THE OWNER OF THE FOLLOWING REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS ; THE NORTH 50 FEET OF TRACT 2 , HARRIES GARDEN HOMES TRACTS ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 34 OF PLATS, PAGE 38 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. C\2I DOES HEREBY IMPOSE ON SAID PROPERTY AS A COVENENT RUNNING TII WITH THE LAND THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: ANY DEVELOPMENT ON THIS PROPERTY SHALL REQUIRE SITE PLAN REVIEW. _0 ANY VIOLATION OR BREACH OF THESE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS MAY BE ENFORCED BY PROPER LEGAL PROCEDURES IN THE SUPERIOR COURT � I OF KING COUNTY BY EITHER THE CITY OF RENTON OR ANY PROPERTY GO I OWNERS ADJOINING SUBJECT PROPERTY WHO ARE ADVERSELY AFFECTED 1 BY SAID BREACH. YRY; /47 - JAME ALPAY I • R n?/1r, 41012 11:1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 'ECD F fi, 00 CI- 4:4:4:4:5, ail i ss - COUNTY OF KING - 11 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that JAMES DALPAY signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. .. Dated : MIJLrW l/ 19 gs ,91.,72iC) Ze/i.a6 ,; N t y Public for the State of Washington My appointment expires : 53' • city 5/05 • • • +• .. �F.IO .if('rt,'ik�„v1 :. ';(;i;i..,..;'r';:..+.. .p' • - :• 9't �, { , 7 ,13: ...- -r• e • • coc, • • - .5 9--31%....1 L . 1 . .,.„.• ‘.:-...- • .• 'i•,;!,.....;!,,4',!:;••.,,'...'......:i,...ri'l.,•,gi,h,,),'.d. .• • ,- ...a .. .. Ititt.t....:.• 1,.::.. ,,,•._.:,..,.,•,...,,,..;. ...:....,.. .... • ....,,,,,1 • ;;v, ° -\ O•[3 / 1 • • , ..i• 's ;,•' .,/;•.j, ..w. i' ii'• '',•, • 'i'. a 1)Ir:..;,,, ....• • '.I• "'',/y09=;3i 3'2 w 14Z. 2. tr 41 ilib 0. . '..o • ,. 1•' ' �6 . • \•o/06.•68• 1' i,:Nd `liVOFCP •} .-.“.• . 1. I.. • • �T. '' �.;' •� i 'fl''wr ��?-,. • : i .,I...t.y i'.� i% _ .,:;.;'/ -Tr' • '1- �. ' . .• ......?.. .,..,i,...T•'..k••••••"-•-•/..,.,...•li,•:,••1••:: !,,,:•;',;?;0,..•••••1:•• : .t./cS'•.'"1 s ' •• •• ,•kJ/ • > 5• - / 1.• :T . i.i `^i ;:a:'' ,•i.• �t`.. �tl i•- • • p0,I4 •�SIw• : �;. t, ,? sal:;. ''I pf ., �/ /�. ' � iv . I,';: }�, ' ,•;, •.4,. . . ,I' Nt);•: I•.r', • v , � h h' :,r. �'-(�'' •)' '`" i4 ,1'i;.,y,,, 1 ",F;:,; ;;1,;'' ,4 e. '. • ;•y % � 'aI ') . ••Pie.' '• I 0 / . Jq . (:)( i. „�,�yt' :',:.h,,1;""�:• . \ .•.,:' % �:'tty. .1 ,,pp.. 00 . I N „° o9s• • • ' .,• ...t' .* •„i! _. ? • ,i07,6:. 509-o3-24E ! • 92•] rtfl' • • 11 - • a' .i i ..." I � .c4 t .,..' ' ii . fs j� I( l 043f ' . :.•i0 I. } ^�p l6) r � • �; " "'' 9 • 5$f' r .' . . ^! ,• :i ;I� . • ! 1: 04 . 19, t, .: . ' • ^•{It %i' ` "" .4,•,b;,. , '1•"'1,.0 h 0050 ,d,` uq Stg1 ,Q lt'.i ''' i 1' .II, , L2_il Li J ,4 3 Dq 1 ,, , 0I/it I ) 1,I C� 1, -� ,;r!° •' /•-1 0.••;•• • y,,„i • 'i.•• .A '73S Q: t P t\ Jki _ __ ~-=•-, ) . /w!m hJ . Ile.' ': . bo4 {Y ppP b 2 Oy ,.�1;..�• rr • . •" y;:::':::.,1..,'` •• • �kjd �m �\k'-I. ,•....- y`F ..'v.,. ; : .:• 1�; • • 11) j�• "i," •,r :1'4.' '.' '9i:'1.. • ,.,� \\0 4.cj •, ,'r Q,:r�; •�J:�}Z f �n Li ,,� ,_ ..,_ to r... � •^ ••',;•.:. ...'...'�: '.. 0, .t q.." '!:�-.• ti... ; .' � '.•.. " ,- ! �: :�-.;. • • .2. '0 ;• _1. s''yy. ,•r n• . "!1`''oQx. •i • •(.:, ,,/.6:7; .-i' �o'b80; I '• .. ,!Ia.Y 0" ,! 1 t,k 0. 1. ' 1 • 14. 1; ,ir•1•. . , • 're'',rm,'. Y,3 •y.'•1;'• • 'j • 111. d h OQIJ�, : '( .ti `,,` .. 1 ` .. • . , i ,:..i ... ,i-.�:: j :,,1,t •L',:•. ,. � sy'•"`. .:Y,',r „�; ,,•,..'� -iy't)L;• .� ^U'•' I::'il'-.. �r„L,.den?:� .i•`, aj{ ry4v..•. - .a " ��[$,,_ p �•N� " A. Go',I•` h� f": ::.: �; Jrl�`7>;•' . I • .1 !(: '+• ,1Y; �':f,^:;,;;: �. .� •'5.,,'1": b- r �, ''J'•".I: .,i �l r,-. .. r�J� .f..tlri;l::, :,: „ '1• -• ;Y' - y •:4 ��•' (��j ' 74- '�II ' ,»• :1: a.;,; r• ,,. 7: i" ruJ,.^ .: ::,:.: tr >»K : I••rl,_} tj �9 b " r l�l. it.. ,. dP; rited'�, .' .`:' i. ° 1' r. :R,;,: i �! .�Y ► �`1..%/:, i,y:�,r0 .'-,yam o_ ; :f' i' _ lr 1�1 :.:, ir!h4 :i;. o �' :i<i, •i;r e' I'` . • �y :, 2. .1. 1 :S': 1 ! • "y•01* „f'i4;; , 'i,, 04,.E `+is.,y i•• k1' u:s.•,;i•:'�fki 1•(. '1� ./ :�1. :1 • 1l dl;, r fi: 4`.'' ,..,54`41'.'; ;-.4..V:n• 'I ' '.. ,�1�,, re: , •.% cX, •-•. .N%,. ri Sf ,, ,., • ..t! ' k',: .ff r.P>t11 . .1i• F°•.,...- ) i1.y..( : N il.�•, - ''�? �'.?, ,.{t'u r li ;�j••)� ,�• ,i ,�.,...;'.''i�'� rujl'+ � � Y�t.:L:c,. .� v'{1''',,e;(, 1 r�Nr•, , ,c�•': q, Ij,•'• f :, _•1l '.r• �,I'. i) }: ,n j ;f' ':'. ., {d �Vty '�ii:�_��f��':....Y�..•. til.'Ji4.i 1 � ..":>, .1 :;g �-•p �� r., \9rar fa:: f y • • ! .;1(( r' lk� ' � .. ii:,. , , ., ,r '.;,1� ,�,•1( $� •;,ihz'. .. F,}• ;:�1 11, 4`' ii' :,%. i''1.�►., °;' CITY 0 F R E �•' `{,,t.' T 1 ,q�,:,,.,�ci��,�'!•' '+'N;'_�Y�•�d illy. ,• `i�;.11'u•V�• ,r N T O ICI '' 1'w rI1'! ,' 'l1 , '. ,Q1(191a1 I y•Ilf pr. f I M •ti, l,r;rrti .Yk.'lr.l ' •,I_rt! V51�..,,.f•: �'. , 1 , ,...i%,:t ,. ,, 1s) r,, �.+ ,�'li'., !.. DtrA11TM[NT or `r'UU1.IC WO111< t >;•/ . r I LJ o: gr ' I. 1' ' s /? 5./ '( ;.A''.ip _{ - - - - ., =4... fit.. •, !% ../MAr..'..11 :•Uq �• ,,w°•` •.•...... t°°, !;A {,f a• � � , �� . �"�+��� DALPAY • • • ;J:• ; ski'. fi., ' 0ularl[o 3 8/ O 2` ( ) 1.,� ,r' f ..r.: o,f,r / �,�1 n1 R rlo.(` 7 8� ( �• ^l.; •'). '��' •.��., 'It on�wn -f- ',, :r]-..,,• ... •.r"••.,. ,i.•'.!:. i''• ' .:'.. [ •.,�> `„,:°:i�i 1.,!/I•r�li+'' CII[CI([D •CAIR 'ono loa-_tea•°- • • ,,....:.,-. •, N,YiF1•cr 11Al j,et*.:�7F..ffflif';,:tlt#1 1'. �l' d.yly�, , 11,40110M 1,4 11)I 1'rJ1., . F,).,t�'t� •. �rrnovro v�e.e)en-verv.uenv •1,e[T or-- .�.J:fa)ini i, ,}�1'�,��A}�'�f741h .,(.,,,�N,l��lflGYs 1.3}I'•F 1 cel ' C4EMORANDUM To Marilyn Peterson, City Clerk Date 2/19/90 Sandi Se- .,, From Current Planning James Dal pay SA-090-88 Subject P y ( ) I am sending the above referenced file to your office to be filed. si ! CITY OF RENTON 1•1L DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION March 10, 1989 Mr. James W. Dalpay PO Box 2436 Renton, WA 98056 Dear Mr. Dalpay: This letter is to inform you that the Site Plan Review Committee revised their decision on the above referenced project. During the appeal period, we received a request for reconsideration. The Committee was asked to reconsider the size of the driveway from twenty (20) feet, as shown on the submitted plans, to thirty (30) feet in order to allow two cars to use the driveway at the same time. In addition, property is being rezoned in the area (along Aberdeen Avenue N.E.) to allow multiple family developments. Development of the area will result in additional traffic to Sunset Blvd. N.E. in front of the subject site. Therefore, the Environmental Review Committee reviewed the request and determined that there should be a covenant attached to the property stating that, at such time when the property to the north develops, a joint driveway will be developed between the two properties. Since this is a new condition of the Committee on your project, you have the right to directly appeal the condition. Any requests for reconsideration or appeal are to be in writing. Reconsiderations of the project are to be addressed to the Environmental Review Committee and submitted before 5:00 PM on March 20, 1989. An appeal must be submitted in writing to,the Hearing Examiner before 5:00 PM on March 20, 1989, and be accompanied by a $75.00 non-refundable fee. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this condition please call me or Jeannette Samek-McKague at 235-2550. For Environmental Review Committee, • Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/McK:mjp • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 -.(206)235-2550 t% CITY OF RENTON ..LL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Design/Utility Engineering MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON DATE: February 9, 1989 D , FE B i 0 1989 TO: Gary Norris, Traffi ngineering FROM: Lynn A. an Public Works Director SUBJECT: 4 Plex at 715 set Blvd. At ERC meeting on 2/8/89, we agreed that Don Erickson would pursue the question of driveway widths as they relate to arterial streets. We concluded: 1) Re: The specific instance at 715 Sunset: The adjacent property is owned by the same individual who owns the 715 Sunset property. Don Erickson will pursue the possibility of ' having the owner build an adjoining driveway on the adjacent property. He will report back on the situation prior to final approval of the building permit. s 2) Re: The general condition: Gary, please investigate the possibility of. revising the parking & loading code to mandate 30 feet driveway widths for driveways leading onto arterials. cc: Don Erickson " Ron Nelson 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 • RECEIVE!) ,z/t/f9 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. • CITY OF RENTON City of Renton Site Plan Review Committee MEETING NOTICE February 6, 1989 To: cniriiiirafiggi:ZW‘4 Carry Springer Ron Nelson Subject: • James W. Dalpay SA-090-88 715 Sunset Blvd. (See attached 1-24-89 Memo) From: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator • Meeting Date: Wednesday. February 8. 1989 Time: (Immediately following the ERC meeting). Location: • 3rd Floor Conference Room 1 - ,11 {,ott• ! CITY OF RENTON ` '" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor •- Traffic Engineering Division MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION TY OF RENTON DATE: January 24, 1989 JAN �,...:. ni 2 .4 1989 • TO: Site Plan Review Committee E CE I U E c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator FROM: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer . • SUBJECT: James W. Dalpay SA-090-88 (a, h • 715 Sunset Blvd. _met ad)i6c40- p4,12/1 a . I am hereby appealing your decision regarding the subject development as it relates to Item. #5 in the Findings. The Traffic Engineering Division asked • that the driveway to the site be 30 feet in width which we recognize is contrary to the driveway ordinance. The reasons for our.request are: � �' 1. Driveway widths below 30 feet do not allow two vehicles to use the I driveway at the same time. For example, if a vehicle was waiting to QOi exit when another vehicle desired to enter, the entering vehicle would � (� have to wait on the street while the existing vehicle cleared. This t type of operation is acceptable on local access streets; however, it creates serious problems on arterials. A 2. The number and orientation of the parking stalls precludes on-site vehicular circulation and will force the motorist to back onto the - arterial . This type of operation creates a potential for unnecessary 5) accidents. • . Therefore, I request that you reconsider the driveway width, number of stalls and their orientation in your site plan review. . GAN:ad . cc: John Adamson 0 Lynn Guttmann GAN011 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 311990-0005-08 - 11900 64701147D1 SHOP N SAVE CORP C0579 HARRIES GAPDEN HOME TRS 1 701 SUNSET BLVD NE RENTON WA 980 311990-0010-01 12.56326 88121001 _ 00 30277 30277 SHOP N SAVE CORP C0579 MARRIES GARDEN HOME IRS 701 SUNSET BLVD NE EX N 50 FT RENTON WA 98055 311990-0011-00 2 12.56326 88721001 27000 33921 33921 DALPAY JAMES W 340929 HARRIES GARDEN HOME IRS PO BOX 2436 N 50 FT RENTON WA 98056 311990-0020-09 3 12.56326 38121001. 22500 HOBACK WALLACE A+BETTY J 709999 HARRIES GARDEN HOME TRS I 25800 60680 60680 PO BOX 621 LESS N 50 FT ODESSA WA 99159 311990-0025-04 3 12.56326 38T2100, 22500 MAILLARD RONALD L+MONA DEE 709999 HARRIES GARDEN HOME IRS I 24000 58419 58419 1408 HAMPTON COURT N 50 FT FRIENDSWOOD TX 77546 311990-0030-07 4 9.54811P 3812100. 22500 BRENNER ANTONIA 249999 HARRIES GARDEN HOME TRS I 27900 29026 29026 821 SUNSET BLVD NE N 78 FT AS MEAS ALG E LN OF RENTON WA 98055 E 115 FT AS MEAS ALG N LN F 11-1-11 1-0. 4 12.56326 31J2100L 3150a .39574. 39574 PAR C E L CONTINUED ON NEXT PA 2 311990-0035-02 J 4TE PARCEL NUMBER-NAME&ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEVY SR RI.S LEVY VALUATIONS GEN'L TAX SPEC.AS'MT TOTAL AMOUNT PAID RECTI RATE EX YR T CODE L-LAND 1-IMPS _ MULL CLIFFORD J 569999 HARRIES GARDEN HOME IRS 4138 187TH SE LESS N 78 FT AS MEAS ALG E LN OF 1SSAQUAH WA 98027 E 115 FT AS MEAS ALG N LN 311990-0035-02 5 12.56326 88T21001 47300 MUNSON INVESTMENT CO 5C-162 HARRIES GARDEN HOME IRS 1 4600 65203 65203 807 LAKE ST S 0303 KIRKLAND WA 98033 311990-0040-05 6 12.56326 88721001 61000 79148 79148 FAIRCHILD WAYNE 649999 HARRIES GARDEN HOME TRS 3623 W WARNER AVE SANTA ANA CA 92704 311990-0045-00 7 12.56326 88121001 24200 STROMBERG ROGER A+DIANA C 619999 HARRIES GARDEN HOME TRS 1 21100 6319 .63193 654 BLAINE AVE NE LOT 7 LESS BEG SE COR LOT 7 RENTON WA 98055 TM NELY ALG ELY MGN 50 FT TH W PLW S LN LOT 7 25C FT TH SJL'' PLW ELY LN LOT 7 50 FT TO S LN SD LOT TH E ALG SD S LN 250 FT TO POB 311990-0046-09 7 12.56326 88121001_ 22500 2826 282:67 HOFFSTROM M J & J B BRYAN R1075 MARRIES GARDEN HOME TRS 8656 HYDRA LN POR LOT 7 - BEG SE COR LOT 7 SAN DIEGO CA 92126 TM NELY ALG ELY MGN 50 FT TH W PLW S LN LOT 7 250 FT TH SWLY PI.W ELY LN LOT 7 50 FT TO S LN SD LOT TH E ALG SD S LN 250 FT TO POB 311990-0050-02 8 12.56326 8812/001 130200 ANDREWS NICK & RODOPI 709999 HARRIES GARDEN HOME TRS I 396400 661541 661581 3325 84TH AVE SE LESS S 70 FT OF E 145 FT AS MEAS B7121001 130200 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 ALG N LN 1 396400 67262 H 672627 336314 311990-0051-01 8 12.56326 88721001 22500 KHATIBI MAHMOUD M 1177 HARRIES GARDEN HOME TRS I 28500 6407 64073 2805 194TH AVE SE S 70 FT OF E 145 FT AS MEAS ALG N ISSAOUAH WA 98027 LN 311990-0055-07 9 12.56326 88721001 67500 BRANDT ALFRED A HARRIES GARDEN HOME IRS I 10100 97491 97491 909 ABERDEEN AVE NE RENTON WA 98055 311990-0060-00 10 12.56326 08121001 81000 JARVIS DONALD V R1077 MARRIES GARDEN MOME TRS I 8600 112567 112567 951 ABERDEEN AVE NE B712100_ 81000 RENTON WA 98055 I 8600 1144.46 F 1144 6 311990-0065-05 11 12.56326 B8'121001 28000 35177 35177 BHATIA ARJAN 0778 HARRIES GARDEN HOME IRS 8506 S 125TH LESS N 37.5 FT RENTO.1 WA 98055 311990-0066-04 11-12 12.56326 88721001 67500 BURCH JAMES P C0375 HARRIES GARDEN HOME IRS 1 8600 95606 95606 957 ABERDEEN AVE N E N 37.5 FT OF 11 & S 1/2 O° 12 RENTCN WA 98055 311 T0-0075-03 12-13 1i.56326 88121001 63000 _ P A R C E J. O N T 1 11 ILED ) N NM T PA G E 02 311990-0080-06 K -DATE FARCEL NUMBER - NAME S. ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEVY SR RLS I:VY VALUATIONS GEN'L TAX SPEC.AS'MT TOTAL AMOUNT PAID REC'T RATE EX YR TCOUE L-LAND I-IMPS TING CHAO-TSAN 0379 HARRIES GARDEN HOME TRS II 15100 95606 95606 4717 132ND AVE SE N 1/2 OF 12 & S 25 FT OF 13 BELLEVUE WA 98006 $ ® CITY OF RENTON "l PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON DATE: January 24, 1989 JA N 2 4 1989 TO: Site Plan Review Committee Lq t f fi \ E c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator FROM: Gary Norris; raffic Engineer SUBJECT: James W. Dalpay SA-090-88 715 Sunset Blvd. I am hereby appealing your decision regarding the subject development as it relates to Item #5 in the Findings. The Traffic Engineering Division asked that the driveway to the site be 30 feet in width which we recognize is contrary to the driveway ordinance. The reasons for our request are: 1. Driveway widths below 30 feet do not allow two vehicles to use the driveway at the same time. For example, if a vehicle was waiting to . exit when another vehicle desired to enter, the entering vehicle would have to wait on the street while the existing vehicle cleared. This type of operation is acceptable on local access streets; however, it creates serious problems on arterials. 2. The number and orientation of the parking stalls precludes on-site vehicular circulation and will force the motorist to back onto the arterial . This type of operation creates a potential for unnecessary accidents. Therefore, I request that you reconsider the driveway width, number of stalls and their orientation in your site plan review. GAN:ad cc: John Adamson Lynn Guttmann GAN011 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON i. REPORT AND DECISION APPLICATION NO. : SA-090-88 APPLICANT: James W. Dalpay LOCATION: 715 Sunset Blvd. N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to allow the construction of a four- plex. The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department, all divisions of the Community Development Department, and the Fire, Police, and Parks Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting, publication, and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2 Site plan (received October 24, 1988) . Exhibit No. 3 Landscape plan (received October 24, 1988) . Exhibit No. 4 Building elevation. plans. Exhibit No. 5 Grading plan (received October 24, 1988) . Exhibit No. 6 First floor layout plan. Exhibit No. 7 Second floor layout plan. Exhibit No. 8 Letter from Board of Adjustment on Variance Application, dated May 26, 1988. Exhibit No. 9 Minutes of Board of Adjustment Meeting on May 25, 1988. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant, James W. Dalpay, has requested site plan approval to allow the construction of a four-plex. 2 . The applicant' s file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. , Site Plan Review Commit Report and Decision January 16, 1989 Page 2 3 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 . 21C, 1971 as amended) , a decision was made by the Environmental Review Committee that the subject project action was exempt from SEPA review. An environmental review was, however, conducted in September 1987 and a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated was issued for a programtic rezone request to the R-3, Residential-Multiple Family zone currently on the site. The mitigation measure imposed on the rezone then was as follows: a. That the rezoning of the site to R-3 to allow a multi-family structure on the property .be conditioned upon an approved site plan review to mitigate concerns about steep slopes, the narrow size of the lot, and possible traffic hazards at the Aberdeen/Sunset intersection. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The site plan, as presented, complies with the parking requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. The City's Traffic Engineering Division has asked that the driveway to the site be a minimum width of thirty (30) feet. This width is also the maximum width allowed under the City code (See Section 4-2204 (B) 3) . If the driveway were to be thirty (30) feet as requested, the width would be in violation with another code provision of the Parking and Loading Ordinance which states that, " . . .driveways shall not exceed forty percent (40%) of the street frontage. " In this case, the lot width is 50.82 feet. Forty percent (40%) of this width is 20.328 feet. Thus, the applicant's lot width is as wide as it can be, without a variance. The applicant has also provided six (6) parking stalls as required by City code for the four-plex. The parking stalls meet the Parking and Loading Ordinance. 6. The subject site was annexed into the City in 1959 by the Adoption of Ordinance No. 1795 and zoned G-1, General Use. The site was rezoned to R-1, Residential-Single Family, in 1982 ; then in 1988 , the property was rezoned to the present R-3 , Residential Multiple Family, designation presently on the site. 7. The site is surrounded by a mix of single-family and multiple-family uses to the north, single-family uses to the east, a commercial establishment to the south, and- I-405 and the Puget Power r.o.w. to the west. 8 . The subject property is narrow (50 feet) and long, with a depth of approximately 200 feet. The terrain is hilly, sloping downward from east to west. 9 . The applicant applied for and received approval for a variance from the Board of Adjustment to allow the proposed structure to be located within the required ten (10) foot side yards. The Board conditioned the approval with the following conditions: a. Structure is to be two stories as shown on plans and construction will start within sixty (60) days after site plan approval. b. Construction will be completed within one (1) year or variance will become void. , Site Plan Review Commit Report and Decision ' January 16, 1989 Page 3 ?. 10. Section 4-738 (D, 1) lists ten criteria that the Hearing is Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval Application. These include the following: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The subject project is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density Multiple Family on the site as well as the Comprehensive Plan policies on multiple family development. The project is located near an arterial street; the project design as modified will have similar amenities as single family dwellings; the project has been designed in a manner that will provide minimal view blockage from nearby properties; and attempts have been made to maintain the existing trees on site. The applicant should work with the City's landscape planner to ensure that sufficient screening has been provided along the arterial street. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The R-3 zone requires yard setbacks of thirty (30) feet from Sunset Blvd N.E. , and rear and side yards of ten (10) feet. The applicant's proposal meets the street setback and the rear yard setback. Due to the narrowness of the lot, the applicant sought approval of a variance from the Board of Adjustment to allow the side yards to be reduced to five (5) feet. The request was granted and the applicant's plan shows five (5) 'foot side yards. The R-3 zoning regulations have a provision for special setbacks of development in R-3 zones abutting a single- family residence provided that the property on which the residence is located is both zoned and shown on the Comprehensive Plan as single-family. Under this provision, no special setbacks are required to buffer the single-family residential use to the north as required by the R-3 zone since that zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations on the property are not the same. However, the applicant must still provide some buffering along the property line in compliance with Section 4-2204 (6) with respect to the landscaping of parking lots. This section requires a five(5) foot planting strip or a forty-two (42") inch fence. The applicant is providing both. c. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and uses; The applicant has provided landscaping and a fence along or near the north property line to buffer the vehicle movements in the proposed parking lot from the residential uses to the north. The parking lot is oriented in a manner that should reduce any light impacts from vehicles entering and leaving the site. All parking is provided along the south side of the property, adjacent to the abutting commercially zoned property. The building is setback on the property approximately seventy-nine (79) feet from the street property line. This is far enough to the west to prevent residents of Site Plan Review Commit ' Report and Decision ' January 16, 1989 Page 4 the project, with units on the north half of the building, from having windows which look into the adjacent single family residential structure which is . located much closer to the street (Exhibit 4) . The height of the building is well within the limitation of fifty (50) feet for R-3 zoned properties as specified in Section 4-709 (C) 6(a) . The height of the applicant's proposed structure is approximately thirty-one (31) feet and therefore should not interfere with any views of nearby property owners. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The project has been designed and located on the site in a manner which follows the existing grade of the site and minimizes the amount of grading done on the site. Further, the proposed plans also show some modification of the grades on the western portion of the property, retaining some of the existing vegetation and incorporating additional landscaping in this portion of the property. The plantings proposed in the landscaping plan are sparse and the applicant will need to work with the City's landscape planner on a revised landscaping plan. In addition to more plantings, the applicant should work with the City's landscape planner on providing additional passive recreational space for the future residents which should include some furniture. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The subject proposal is expected to enhance property values in the immediate area due to the quality of design of the project and the sensitivity shown in locating the building on the site. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The applicant's site is narrow which restridts, to a degree, the ability of the applicant to create a design which completely separates the vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns. Staff does not anticipate any problems with the circulation pattern due to the fact that there will be a maximum of six vehicles on the site at one time and it is not anticipated that all six would be leaving at the same time. It is anticipated that there will only be approximately six (6) to (8) persons on the property as well. Therefore, the likelihood of major pedestrian/vehicular conflicts seems remote. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The project as designed and oriented on the site provides sufficient light and air exposure for the development. h. Mitigation of noise, odors. and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The proposal is not anticipated to create levels of noise or amounts of odor above the existing levels in the area. There will be an incremental increase in noise due to the addition of the potential of six potential vehicles at a site which has been undeveloped • 1.' - Site Plan Review Commit Report and Decision January 16, 1989 Page 5 and the addition 6 to 8 additional persons to the F, immediate neighborhood. The five (5) foot high cedar fence on the south side of the parking lot and a retaining wall and 3 .5 foot fence near the north side of the lot will contain most of the noise that will impact residential properties to the north. In addition, the fence on the retaining wall will also provide a degree of safety to keep people from accidently walking off the retaining wall. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and The subject site is adequately served by public services. There is a twelve (12) inch water line along Sunset Blvd. N.E. and an eight (8) inch sanitary sewer located near the west property line, on the applicant's property. Police and emergency services will be able to adequately serve the site. The number of new residents is expected to be less than eight (8) people and should have minimal impact on these services. In order to increase the level of safety for future residents, the applicant should work with the Police Department on appropriate measures to which provide some security and safety for future residents as well as enable emergency personnel to efficiently respond to service calls. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The construction of the proposed development is not anticipated to have any detrimental impacts on the neighborhood which might result in neighborhood ' deterioration and/or blight. Conclusions: 1. The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments and focused on were: a. landscaping; b. fencing; c. security and adequate unit identification; d. recreation; and e. compliance with parking and loading requirements. 3 . The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density Multiple Family and the zoning designation of R-3, Residential-Multiple Family. 4 . This is an infill project which is adequately served with public services. . Site Plan Review Commit Report and Decision ,. January 16,. 1989 Page 6 Decision: The site plan for James W. Dalpay, file no. SA-090-88 should be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant shall comply with the conditions of the variance permit issued by the Board of Adjustment. 2. That the applicant shall work with the. Police Department on appropriate measures by which to provide security and safety for future residents as well as enable emergency personnel to efficiently respond to service calls. �. 3 . That the applicant shall work with the City's landscape planner to revise the landscaping plan for the site, increasing the amount of plantings around the property. 4. That the applicant shall work with the City's landscaped planner to provide some terraced and landscaped open space for the future residents as well as providing some outdoor furniture, such as picnic tables, bench seating, .etc, at the western portion of the site. For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. Notes to Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or for work required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper permits. ORDERED this 20th day of January, 1989, on behalf of the Site Plan Review Committee. Q,i)r Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator TRANSMITTED this 20th day of January, 1989, to the parties of record: James W. Dalpay_. PO Box 2436 Renton, WA 98056 George W. Lucker, Architect 140 Rainier Avenue South Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED this 20th day of January, 1989, to the following: • Site Plan Review Commit ci Report and Decision January 16, 1989 Page 7 Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Don Monoghan, Acting Engineering Supervisor Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Ronald Nelson, Building Director ' John'Adainson, Developmental-ProgramrCoordinator' Valley Daily News REOUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before February 3 , 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011(8) (1) , which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on February 3, 1989 accompanied by a $75. 00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex party (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. . . •••• .•-•f.,,•-• .••:::tt=If .....,5:-...-.....:.-..1 • g - 6-1430 9 Vi.N OZ/DN aling 8061 31cos . Q1•c412011 11111 491erfilQr3t-4 el'qd 1151-vIflN -Aa,..1t/.41"1o;-. f1 1.14?. tt1a -J- GA il 1. Loi M f I l.11- 7.0 :!0 40 .. '' . • . ...._,....:„: , .• • 1, t _ _t___, tli v er / 1 .. 1 • =...,...._, ..•..... . .. • I 4 , • 7.=-: • -=•,:. 1 ...--•'. I . ../ // . . . • • isv\?: , ' 1 1. • -. ' - -. ._,,r-- 1 i 411 : • 1 /4—.. , 11 .... . [. . .I ..,.... ... .ra i!_ ,_...: -_-.-_- I .. . - , .:. ____ I 1- ii " I.• • . 9 . • . •\ .---.1 •• • • . li t — i! •• 'I\-- •-- Il 11. t. d •!-I.- . —.—_• --°•._—__..--7-.. -- •-.,4 11 s\ . I I b I I . i —..`--: • i t s ii I =—.-- I • I • eh . g' --- I it:1 s . , t 1 ,,•1 i . I . I.1 •I A I T----- 1 • V gl .. I II . I i A i• ,,i -- :FO.. 11'. AI:t.; ,1 i I • - '1114-111:11- i• • 14 • -1-1 • \ I • ... .__.. -1.-l• . . . -[:_. I In,-----:- . , . • .• ,.. gi 1 I - ,\‘__-"._i i 1 v,• • IN I C . :4 l...1 1 I • . • .i• 11 • •- 1_,• \ I l_i 1 ,.. ‘.,, • i -1 - • . ,,: .__.,__.r.,__.,•,. \:.. • / a •• I I •11 • •• .• - . ' It„.•• ..:k_. _f.,_ .I .. • _.,,' .'i ..1 l' .> 1 i'1 .1 k • • . • II 1 ‘ • I . ' ... tr. .---- - '. • I 1 I I . 1 • I I t .1 I I ii 5..., i 1.__I 1 ;-----' x1--, • I 11,_ -!1 . II , i . ; • 1 1-1 s% ', , ; i I I I ...I . ,/ ... 1. I • . I ' 'N.. • . .•=: \: i' I I ,' t.. 1 1 n . 4 ? --1- I I • kJ). - 11 11. . to , . . . - . . N : • rk / ------- - i Nt. ' ; !.1___ • , . . • . • • . • • rgi 1 11 1 i ___ • i 1 i II I . . ..ii. •.•: ,, , . I . 1 i 1 '• 1 1 ii • . , 1 ... • - . i,....":. :I, • , ,-, , 1 • . • V I.. • '" •.• I i . ! I I ......:..; :....:. 1 , . . -1---. II • . . ../..E..... : , ". _, , 1 ..: . • • . 1 Ii • .• . ,,1 1 : 1 ,,= 111 :...„ -, id _ I. .1 • . . . • . . i ... . • . , f, .. . . . . . . . ; . .. t. '9 • • • ' . ....- .. . iA C�j�� -nII C ' 6t• A rJ V •-� i• 8861: vz 13O a • . . i.: ...... • NOIN38 J0 A110 NOISIAI0 ONINNY1d • • II PARK we N ' • 1 b•r� e9 ra° 1 I ' „.---.-- -7 ri ) E It se. • • 4 / ; a ic 1 —Is= • • / Iva__ 4__ 4lI , • 4. 11.4__ a .-a .1 I ,.. it• Ise Iw— v •.fO . �J ,,, . a .0fl:: • • • '. -——--__-- r..."--,--!:'..... 1.---,,,, : �� ! �� I ,\`-._ _ . _ .. - P •' I L . 1 [`gyp\ •. g.it3 '' 0 '4:, \\ i.'-.4.1- • j•L --11 —--1:;.-. tt.--L, 1. • Pe t /ate _ 5`..1 pit! d�`7. - C��� °,.,� N. — 9 III v. , - .• • L • t� \ • ---- �� _ ._, 1 \ 1 i 1 V �6� ;f ~ _l ip\\ J \ Q_ ' '_ • i IS l o ii ,. y . : l'i rr 4`: ''._4 O:—`_me. k pp • _.... ' •1t�,�'� I .may`; �.. � \ ' *gy •,`-- ���"., _ °7 • —fir _ 3 0 _ _ -, _- 04` tF pause—Q Ni 1 ,, .1W. a ----1-----414.:4--------s------ -----si: 1 - Oil . • 3 4 , [ i i i 3 1 110. ♦•oJ&LINIT�J4PAM1FNT_ eu11•PIN6 IJN05CAPIN& PLAN xEa�E. Id WG.iex A airre�c( '� -1---„ N 4 fi + ..F:S: HE -u n 4 SUNser p!-vo we,. I ive.en, I. I l • .Y 1 Remior•1 WA. 1eoh 4'1fe.ogaq I I i l I I a II __ ",��` i _ 11 1 • rcr•G = -.i f' r '� I ' _ i 1 I ^ d �' 1 i i _ . s rR S of .3 ,�.... Irw. ; I $ 3 z I = .1 s:0', 1 i' y o; : \� \ ! 1 I //-m'"�"'•• -./ • I ' 11— L I • I I i 1 I I "'` i` 1 1 , / �H / _ r • I I - .Si I .awirr ci+c $wuf j \ I ' nn Onn...5 . c`—_ III V Ndl'G+aa'E 70'1 so' II.H.r! _. rl+b.:.cwcn+:.w+.1 .. — t 1- r-a 1 • I % • i Imam 1 ' , .. �i�+D 1 • .t hi I L I.n • .,�+•II j.Lr'/. 9I /i.Fw+r.I' t 114Yr iNrT1 r !rm.%el ' .... , • // I —'1in \ . ,\ % .- �— _ / j i/� j i 4I I 1 • t r. • I 3 I \ I► — _..r,.... 1 \ �; I II / i i".ram i , 1 It`1'I • _ I , Se -AI ( ` I ` K. \\. 1 '.111 \ \ / L_►I(1I11I t / ///_ �• / \:e" `ii \' �s��p")�y"«�aCli 31' j 1/ .......;,‘,iit.r,,,, \1 ¢'�Lwn61 1 / I I I I/,ill/ `f�'J_ — , .noT5 .. �,...v. 3 IL, /J�Ym• \I I I E ;1 1 ,l4+rMT1.�+—re>tcatld•gi:Df b I t 1 ' \ i i l 1. / I/ 1'/ '�' 1' . I : I. -p 1 I • f,\\ r d ! 17 I i 1 1 r "a"; I or7'4/ les. : /.//:." Vio,wr:--- . _�'•`•r 1— I—. /'- —_ T 1 / , IA,` I s:a• j I I/ i %—+a. .f. / . / ••. .1 — 1 w:rc,.a••.) • Q . / rr N- n H / / / % / • II I. Want • o .x .7:10.`T'7 I 2 Q' ` 1 IT DEAN:_- a(v.40:Twcc:,e•c..w.ao • `� - I IL 8''S..SE_.. ` .I'� 10�0' • ---- wnw. u.rtew5'� •.cJ 1 _. ♦ate 1 Fav;...,, Li • \ J �+aJ�I \ \ LEl4_ ••,- '^rTrgj P.M.. tr[GJrt9• _ \ I 1 0 Tar IY+QL SO MET C.TG.GT�r _ f�oCO._ Ili V vc�� 7 P.m - �.y.rs —7ao j. 1 - -- i �r+r-- -e1/..-Li• I=es.: I I • LID' F.5O'T w•+ p I ynr r.rJ' ID "Ti s's=1Jsn.c �_�_�_�tnwrl.+e I I r Y il'U fJ A_ .4:1. Z_ _-=, cy.".,TIpM�.. -1a�r' _.i``LalNll. l4f.'.. I— •W—,'•0= - I M N.' �O Z vlOwrT-r .P:.a►I . i I t e. .A. /� d r mo I o I Ip�� _fit: cp _Z CD Ci) � % F; i IM3CZ= � �: x b / I ` i, ,� -�"@ J fr .,ram u•t , �s•'.�^ NETS+ I 1 •rcv Gz fiov /{ .r" r i 11 I 1 .:....�. Y I1 - -- - - - - t • a. r—_'.. 1 - r1. 1 ,� .1 1'1 hlE '1tl' STREET • .1 iP - dI r.— I... /' y,� >:.V1 G • I•\ Y 1..r i.4 L le sn.+w�+ccr. =• \ \ [I d )• �, ~ L I TI 4.-rj_d .MR., "s I 1- - - - 6- 1� I - ► �/ -jter_ - --1 i-- I-- � i'- -I iI��I, �." ii/ _lij , r� t � V \ 1\ I �karoncel= f'' Ii NU..,.„4•E �19.Gn' i 1 1 tie.'s — Pi?'+r"'.-�_ /^/�3..�,: ?_c_n+-w! •l•r— i f - CIt y • fo i I•. I I �,/� I v. '° ' "::::`Jto:r /et/ `•/1 �_y ww I �! 4 .c % 1. ,. 1 • I • t t \ 1 1 \ \ I' wt�we_s.:w „e.irr� I 1 I a '. , / i �s -ti �b ` r • l L t .R .�! / . r I • 1 �I \ �+.rs'Inrs 1 i 1. ti+a orowes I 1 r� I:' µ / / /: � A� .r 1 —* _ \ rimrFLmR ei»r 1b5.11 ; I I I I:17'.. '2'"1. j /- ; \\ \ / .�>�'r f I 'y i 1 ` 1 - . \ V.ENOND Flim¢n.....n4-x •--'- /i. //e _es-z. ' ,...4.-e.. -rew.dcr V us y I .I 1 O, \ l J \ ! r ! 1111f1111 3 // / d -�.c.Mccw..a 7 I 1. -A.,Tr, , rrvi..nc1' I 1 1 / 11 :-/y1 1' 1tli I I ! / I/ P1 /r `.- 'I. eels s..�T,.•v;� • Q d 11 j �l 1 s.: ! N �TTr' .+ — .—Tom— _—y=-j. — 1 1 I ` -1 ( ( L� rr im'=% I°s'i•/ IIi.� G�' :• . .1—. W....;1m.�L' �' /ell :iI I I` 1 f 11 �,1� J.." / 1 / , '•/ . b ,�— -ate� -=� • ' aO.�„�, / , =j.e�-� �sol / l /- �aa \ ibhb �. • '� I. / / /, /' / 1 • 1 �' 1 i , 11 . , j / / / / - , ,/ . • I . i �/ `s 7. _ Si . • • 4 1tl`�G —-P(i fir.,— .f* :no•a...,..� ,_ - i I! b'y�se� ! . I•- 10-0' • -o — i+T.i•-'iRcra+Tv R.sr. •r d� 1 \aey Arms ? _=osnwi—re4rsrat, - \\\ 11Je.rocr.. b7Ilt1 0 'a 1 .G1. FIM0.ibN�F +K.I��j •}►+Gelb r I' • st • 5 1: I 6 9OM.i... I. • Is.- I - 1....r 9 1 , � al a -• f • • �I "" I • %.- ni C . FRI NTE • • t �� t u 41 o = � a I ¢ • b "G� � I GIC CS, • r03 z o o :o�c�s 1ti i 9-2-as I 'g. a - . Ill/..St - .N� .1tL rJTRCET --r ov v 41 Z BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT • RENTON. WASHINGTON FA inkK ar0i MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 • 235-2540 OpA kr 42. D,Q-*rEO SEP -�' May 26, 1988 James W. Dalpay P.O.Box 2436 Renton, WA 98056 SUBJECT: V-536-88 JAMES W. DALPAY requests a variance to Section 4-709,A-C4, to construct a building within the sideyard setback: property located in the vicinity of 715 Sunset Blvd. N.E. Dear Mr. Dalpay: The Renton Board of Adjustment at its regular meeting on May 25, 1988, granted your request for a variance as stated above with the following conditions. 1. Structure is to be two stories as shown on plans and construction will start within sixty (60) days after site plan approval. 2 . Construction will be completed within one year or ' variance would become void. This is the only variance granted under this application and all other provisions of the Renton Municipal Code will apply. Sincerely, c/4 ames C. Hanson, Secretary Renton Board of Adjustment RGN:plp • BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING MEETING May 25, 1988 MINUTES MEETING #217-88 BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Chi Chu, William Anderson, Lee Connel and David Young CITY STAFF PRESENT James Hanson, Assistant Building Director and Pat Prewitt, Administrative Secretary 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment was called to order by Chairman Young at 8 :00 p.m. 2 . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairman Young led the Board and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. 3. ROLL CALL The Secretary called the roll. All members were . present with the exception of Smock, Lally and Karinen. ACTION: Motion made by ANDERSON, seconded by CONNEL that the absent members be excused. MOTION CARRIED. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ACTION: Motion made by ANDERSON, seconded by CONNEL that the minutes of April 27, 1988 be approved as written and distributed. MOTION CARRIED 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED (a) V-536-88 JAMES W. DALPAY requests a variance to Section 4-709,A-C4, to construct a building within the sideyard setback: property located in . the vicinity of 715 Sunset Blvd. N.E. Mr. Hanson advised that the property was zoned R- 3 , Multi-family and that the lot is a long narrow piece of property, approximately 50 ' x 200 ' . The lot also has a substantial slope toward the highway. The lesser sloping area is proposed for the parking area, which Mr. Hanson pointed out on the site map. There would be two levels to the building although from Sunset, it would appear to be only one story. As the project is proposed, it would not block any views. The contractor would be limited to a 30 ' wide structure because of the lot size. Mr Dalpay wants to construct his building five (5) feet from the property line which would meet the Building Code but not the Zoning Code. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ' PUBLIC HEARING MEETIN_ May 25, 1988 Page 2 Continuing, Mr. Hanson said the parking would be on an upper level with a stairway, down to the building. He read the letter of justification which stated in part that: a. To build within the sideyard setback will result in a four story building which is permitted in the R-3 zone but not desirable to the adjacent properties. b. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the surrounding property since the building height will be reduced to residential scale, two stories in contrast to possible four stories. c. Recent developments in the area enjoy similar benefits. - It would be too restrictive with the sideyard setback. • Mr. Hanson then showed slides of the property noting that with the trees removed, it will have a good view of the valley and Lake Washington. He said that most of the vegetation will be removed and open up the view considerably. The chairman asked if there were any questions the Board would like to ask Mr. Hanson. There were none at this time. Mr. Young invited comment from the applicant. James Dalpay, P.O.Box 2436, Renton, WA. 98056, was present to speak on behalf of his application. He stated that the lot is narrow and also very steep. The lot to the north is zoned residential and enjoy less than a 5 ' setback. The south lot is B- 1 and enjoy a zero lotline setback. Mr. Dalpay stated that it would not be detrimental to the surrounding property. He stated that his proposed building will not be any • larger than some residential. Mr. Dalpay said he plans on having four units although he could have six units. He feels this will be more aesthetic to the area, will mitigate the view to the east. Six units would block the view from Sunset, and developing the property from the north would block the view: also. He stated that recent developments to the north enjoy similar benefits. In response to an inquiry as to when construction would commence, Mr. Dalpay said he had been held up three months because of zoning so he now plans to start in July or August. He could not do this without the setback variance and it would not be feasible because of the lot size. It would be detrimental, view wise, to construct a four story structure. He said there is a nice residence across from the lot and, without the variance, he would block their view. The trees they see now are approximately 15 to 20 feet high but if he would go up with six stories, it would be considerably higher. Mr. Dalpay was asked if he would build a four story structure if the variance was not granted. He replied that he probably would go to six stories which would be allowed in the present zoning. He felt the Ordinance was wrong to have .. 5' setbacks in this case. He felt that with a six BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PUBLIC HEARING MEETIN(s May 25, 1988 • Page 3 • story building, fire trucks would have difficulty getting around the building. Mr. Hanson .responded that fire trucks would not be going onto the property other than possibly into • the driveway, in any case, because of the steep slope. Five foot is the minimum setback. Ten feet is stated in the Zoning Ordinance for R-3 and R-4 zones, which covers complexes of small nature such as this and large complexes. The Chairperson called for further comment in support of the proposal. There were none. The Chairperson then called for comments in opposition. There were none. The public hearing was then closed. ' The Chairman then opened the matter for discussion. There being none, Connel asked to entertain a motion. • ACTION: Motion by CONNEL,• seconded by ANDERSON, that the • Board grant the variance request as there are special circumstances. The property lot is narrow and the topography is such to limit the proposed construction. Proposed construction is much more desirable than what is legally permitted and will comply with the ordinance. The following • conditions will apply. It will be constructed with two stories as shown on the plan, construction starting by August 30th. At this point, it was noted that Mr. Dalpay still must go through the Site Plan approval with the Zoning Division, which could be a lengthy process. The construction dale was then changed to sixty days after approval with completion within one year of the variance would become void. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 5. OLD BUSINESS • None • 6. NEW BUSINESS None 7 . ANNOUNCEMENTS 8 . ADJOURNMENT ` Meeting adjourned at 8 : 25 p.m. • /(1,/,),(ea s C. Hanson, Secretary • • Approved BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT May 25, 1988 V-536 -88 James W. Dalpay requests variance to construct a four unit • apartment building within five feet of the property line in a R-3 zone. BACKGROUND: The subject lot was recently rezoned from single family residential to R-3 which is medium density multifamily zoning. The location is abutting Sunset Blvd NE which is a minor arterial. Presently the lot is vacant and wooded. There is considerable slope from Sunset to the west where the lot abuts the freeway. The lot to the north has a single family residence on it at the present time. The zoning of the northerly lot is R-1. Most of the houses in the area are one story or two story in height. The houses across Sunset Blvd have some view of Boeing and Lake Washington. Construction of a tall building may partially block some of the neighbors views. The subject lot is 50 feet by 207 feet. The long narrow shape of the lot and the steep topography make locating a building more difficult. A 10 foot side yard setback is required in an R-3 zone for a lot that is 50 feet wide. The subject to the north being zoned R-1 would require a 5 foot sideyard setback. The maximum width of building allowed on the subject lot would be 30 feet. The owner has stated that in order to build four units he would have to go up four stories rather than the two he is proposing. RECOMMENDATION: The granting of the variance will preserve some views from the neighbors properties. • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • zRENTON'BOARD OF'AADJIQBTMifIT-' , Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states ;;'. ,.PUBLIC HEARING MEETING Cf that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the . :' ;; ' ,MAY 25,19$8. .,:k':,.;.. . . .::. .. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING." A'public•hearing will.be'held'.by the Renton Board'of Adjustment-at its regular VALLEY DAILY NEWS business meeting In the Council Chambers, Renton Municipal Building,Renton,,Wash- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Ington, on May'25, 1988,:at8:00 p.m. to. consider the,following; ,:, "" Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers (,a#038=88•''JAMES W fDALPAY,: are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six �� .x ,;� ';.; r,r: ' ,; ;. iJ months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published reque9ts.A variance to Section 4Z0 ;A C4, in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ;.to,construct.a building within the sideyard County, A E Washington.The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as alegal setback; property located in:the,,vnity of g PP :715 Sunset lvd.•N.E �.:,�-• ,y.,r,;r •,, newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for j``ANV AND ALL''PERSONS.INTERESTED King County. .ARE.NVIBTED TO B PRESENT AT�THE BOARD;'OF,'ijAR•1USTMENT MEETING ON The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition• May 25,'1988, AT 8:00 P.M.'TO VOICE HEIR,SPRQTES,T.,OR;OBJECTIOS TO , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in SAME 1,`!:" r :; , :,,;:;,. ,:;;;,.;,;r �'�Y` '' '° 'r James C:Hanson;Secretary supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers 4,+�t�•;t,.,�;4„ ;.;,� duringthe below stated period.The annexed notice ai Published r Renton Board of Adjustment P May 13, 1988 1Jalle'r Daily News R5048 Accourjt.#51o67-`,:1`*''' qu,, ,:t. Pub1ic- 1iParirlg Moetiitcj ka „C „jy : �j }�jtirl9, was published on May 13 , 19 88 R5 0 4 S , The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 18 .2 41 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 3 r delay of M a Y 19 Notar ublic for the State of Washington, �.•• `�I. y; residing at Federal Way, `� • > > -� � :..1 r� , � � King County, Washington. ' t. !.1 ,r� ti VDN#87 Revised 11/86 ` • • g • 1�V1d OF RC13. • z . VARIANCE APPLICATION z sal CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON -Po 'Opp ��Q BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT L l C„ Q(� 1TPD SEPleg 1-3Pi'. 2519B8 (206) 235-2550 13H4LDINO /ZOMIK DEPT, NOTE: TO APPLICANT: Please OFFICE USE ONLY read instructions on 1 / �a - back of this form Application No. : V- ej36 -Ue carefully before Associated File(s) : —Del -LP) preparing your appli- cation for VARIANCE. Date Received: - 25 _ Date Accepted: Approved: ):Ef )DATE: J ' �(5 JCJ�-% Denied: D ) Publication Date:5-I?)_.fig Affidavit: Caiprehensive Plan ma), r N3 j-( 1.,F/ 1 Zoning: 13-3 1 Ir a9.J.ition to the information below, the applicart should include a site map and anv other pertinent information which will assist in the review of this application. The Building & Zoning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the application (note Variance Application Procedure on the last pace) . 1. Name of Applicant: JAMES W. DALPAY 2. Mailing Addreess• P.O. BOX 2136 RENTON, WASHINGTON 980!6 /'telephone No. : 226-6363 3. APPLICANT IS: 21 Owner .D Lessee Er Contract Purchaser ID Other (Specify) • 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: /TTelephone ' •YL- 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection) : 715 SUNSET BLVD. N.E. RENTON, WA. 6. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : THE NORTH 50 FEET OF TRACT 2, HARRIES GARDEN HOMES TRACTS ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN VOLUBE 34 OF PLATS, PAGE 3P, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 7. State EXACT VARIANCE REQUESTED/SPECIFY CODE SECTION: REQUEST 5 FOOT SET BACK - FOR SIDE YARD. CODE SECTION /1-709A-C4 -1- 8. Why can't the property bt uaveloped within the requirements of the ordinance? THE FX I ST I Nr I f1T,. ALTIOUGK, A LFnAI Ru I I n LNG ' cEF IS ONLY 50 FEET WIDE AND HAS AN AVERAGE SLOPE OF 15.5% WHICH MAKES IT TOO RESTRICTIVE FOR AN R-3 SIDE-YARD SETBACK. • I AFFIDAVIT I, JAMES W. DALPAY , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and . belief. ----744gn) tore o Owner P.O. BOX 2436 Address RENTON. WflSHINGTON 98056 City, State, and Zip Code Number) Telephone No. 226-6363 Subscri ed and sworn before me this ZSrlir day of 1L/e , 19 1a Notary Public in and' for the State of Washington, residing at /I,iici Name of ta.ry ub c ya4 n/ Address A/140-t, GUI ) geF°S" _2- FORM 167 . ,i i Y (Di= RENTON 2,5 198E JUSTIFICATION: RDING / ZONI'NG DEP)., BUILDING SITE IS 50 FEET X APPROXIMATELY 207 FEET, 10,350 SQUARE FEET: PERMITTING SIX DWELLING UNITS. THE COMPREHSIVE PLAN DESIGNATES ADJACENT PROPERTY MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI- FAMILY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS RECENTLY REZONED R-3. ADJOING PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH IS ZONED B-I AND TO THE NORTH R- I . WE .)(PROPOSE TO IMPROV E SITE WITH A FOUR UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING. TWO UNITS LESS THAN THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED FOR R-3 ZONE. (A) REDUCTION OF THE REQU(RED SIDE YARDS IS DESIRED TO EFFICIENTLY DEVELOP THE SITE. HARDSHIP IN THIS CASE IS THE NARROW SITE( 50 FEET IN WIDTH) WHICH IN THIS CASE IS A LEGAL BUILDING SITE AND THE NATURAL SLOPE TO THE WEST. TO BUILD WIAHIN THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK WILL RESULT IN A FOUR STORY - BUILDING AHICH IS PERMITTED IN THE R-3 ZONE, HOWEVER NOT DESIRABLE TO THE l6Mll4( AREMPRRINKITUP ADJACENT PROPERTIES. (B) GRANTING OF TBE SIDE YARD VARIANCE WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE SUR ROUNDING PROPERTY FOR THE FOLLOWIN REASONS: (I) BUILDING HEIGHT WILL BE REDUCED TO RESIDENTAL SCALE, TWO STORIES, IN CONTRAST TO POSSIBLE FOUR STORIES FOR A NARROW BUILDING WITH PRESENTLY REQUIRED SETBACKS. (g) VIEWS OF PROPERTIES EAST OF SUNSET WILL BE PREXERVED BY LOWER PROFILE. (3) BUILDING VULK AILL BE SINILAR TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE BY LIMITING DEVELOPMENT TO FOUR UNITS THUS MITIGATING IMPACE OF REDUCED SIDE YARDS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. (4)B-I USE TO THE SOUTH WILL NOT BE AFFECTED. (C) NO: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE AREA ENJOY SIMILAR BENEFITS. (D) YES: VARIENCE AS REQUESTED IS REQUIRED FOR REASONABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SITE WHICH WILL APPEAR TO BE OF LOWER DENSITY THAN PERMITTED IN THE R-3 ZONE. CITY Gr° RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION • October 27, 1988 James W. Dalpay P.O. Box 2436 Renton, Washington 98056 Re: Dalpay Site Plan Approval, 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. SA 090-88 Dear Mr. Dalpay: . The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for the Technical Advisory Committee on November 9, 1988 for consideration. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact our office at 235-2550. -S. ely, /pte# Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator . DKE/lb:mjp 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 ;- AC��� REN,.,.1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL,.-�RTMENT O 404 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH ` .V At '�v �O,e ry e G1 9F��1f REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: TtIc e^ ' �9 y LATE CIRCULATED: _10/27/88 COMMENTS DUE:_11/7/88 "Zip �d ECF 090-88 fPPLICATION NO(S) : SA-090-88 • PROPONENT: James' W. 'Dalpay 1 PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Applicant seeks administrative site plan approval to develop a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with La Use and Comprehensive Map zoning designations for the subject parcel. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. SITE AREA . 23 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 2, 000 sq ft footprin approximately. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° 1. Plants ° o ° 5. Animals ° ° o ° Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14. Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° '.---- ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which e have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are wher 'onal information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Si ture of Director or Authorized Representative to Rev. 6/88 REND.,.: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D1IrriRTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 090-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 090-88 PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay_ PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval (administrative) to construct a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with Land Use and Comprehensive Plan Map zoning designations. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED a..AiP/(eA/5 DATE /(/K SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REL.-N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E__ARTMENT 1°GQNN/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S '�'` -F, c��0��40/!// /I a 0/' 9&PT 01/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �-I'�I i'�'► ,., 1 i� 8.49 DATE CIRCULATED: 10/27/88 COMMENTS DUE: 11/7/88 8 ECF 090-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-090-88 PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Applicant seeks administrative site plan approval to develop a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with La Use and Comprehensive Map zoning designations for the subject parcel. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. SITE AREA .23 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :2 , 000 sq ft footprin approximately. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° ° 0 ° ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4. Plants ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use - ° o ° - - ° I9. Housing ° ° 0 ° I10. Aesthetics ° ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation 0 ° o ° - 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° 0 14 . Transportation ° o ° 15. Public Services ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: - - _ - We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we hav= -,.pe tise and have identified areas of probable impact or are Where additi. - in ° ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1 I3'M-- �..4.9_,_ //— g — Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Date 11- 2- Rev. 6/88 REN° COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE RTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 1 ECF - 090-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 090-88 PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval (administrative) to construct a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with Land Use and Comprehensive Plan Map zoning designations. ,LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: X UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: (j- lthe_s APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED Al.50'OF T.2 E,f A49ee/E3 UTILITY APPROVAL SOE. T T;3 _ _ GAJeAEN N /I�i D .6 7�,4c75 {LATE COMERS ACREEI L-I G47E l,Es ice,2,7¢ /O.6S03 A-Se.B2'- Osiiii.ZS' LATE COMERS AGRE?I=: SEwE4 _ LtyQ.--1_ SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT e:. WA7Eg Es 41/'7S O°x 4 vv rs = 0700. o f SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C. . SWER Mil> .17®Dx4 N/75 = it ime), o® SPECIAL ASSESSMENT f:::Ti a i`11.1 EIi MMI /BOO•o® SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AK! :: ::E-SEWER n/Q APPROVED WATER PLAN y GS CLCUZI7 Er t2 No 0 L !-t y oa-A--•rS APPROVED SEWER PLAR NO . . IOC- d4. ONE APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS _ BY FIRE DEPT. . FI^"FE-7 MAIMS NV ,w. DATE /l q. —Sg - SIGNATURE OF RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE //_ L _ a �, REV. 6/88 ,I - / J RENTO±1 ::OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPL___MENT AEI ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH 'A.� y,C 0,00/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: av '?.YCdfl-V\ 4 ,G % Q�Difj 4 DATE CIRCULATED: _10/27/88 COMMENTS DUE:_11/7/88 w/o_�%) ECF 090-88 �S D APPLICATION NO(S) : _SA-090-88 PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Applicant seeks administrative site plan approval to develop a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with La Use and Comprehensive Map zoning designations for the subject parcel. OCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. SITE AREA .23 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :2 ,000 sct ft footprin approximately. �MPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° Air ° ° . 0 3 . Water ° ° t Plants ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° 0 E . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9. Housing ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ‹.. . ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14. Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services ° o - ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: 0 �Goc l�A (!( &f e a G gf h,c400,- 7,01,p ILG4 c,...- $i%c f ye(c 74/"A- - wecJer 74bb ,Wer&L7 Gc) 600.' a /Ae gw e- Ac4,69r- g �. - / y -� /id/ 4,00 fl/ fdte, 7�" f (( ee/e, (�(/ f lc-f" 7‘,-a� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are Where ' ona information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 11/7/Ar Sig re of Direc or or Authorized Representative Date 4Jil GlnBGr ae ( 6�r Liv/fe‘feis#. �Jl/ cfA Rev. 6/88 evb i 7t'`_(f I . RENTOIN uOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAX J.L ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 090-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 090-88 PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval (administrative) to construct a four-plex. Proposed development is 6onsistent with Land Use and Comprehensive Plan Map zoning designations. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE . _PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED / l/ deg//40' d6,0W rIUu/d r t g re :Ai 4/4, e dziw/4p1i i/ I 1T�a� a �locLJ �ICeGI4 Aimai G.il��/lC�dcJI fbvq,((.C. 4e f�pcl�B� 4 'àare Gr the Ho/7C /' 4 1-- /6 s` DATE / ?/6e. ( SIGNATURE OF ECTOR OR UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / / EV. 6 88 • C% qfl <Gi 70�/e 4e i G1 (-r8 ieG[ l�le� % / eG 5/ems ffl7 14� re/ '/e . `� REM-- COMMUNITY DEVELOPM 'NT DL___:tTMEN2► C/I� N/D/f r �, ,k,, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S�, E 'vial/ V 46,, ,.., 7 B (REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: � � /c�l ��p 8 f (DATE CIRCULATED: 10/27/88 COMMENTS DUE: 11/7/88�" U 1 IECF 090-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-090-88 ,PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay 1 1 'PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex 1BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Applicant seeks administrative site plan approval to develop a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with La Use and Comprehensive Map zoning designations for the subject parcel. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. 1 SITE AREA .23 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :2 , 000 sq ft footprin approximately. 1 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth �/ ° ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° o ° ° 3 . Water 0 4.,-7 ° ° I O O ° 4 -r . Plants • i, ° ° o ° ° 5. Animals L''`l ° I ° 0 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources b-�'� ° ° ' 7. Environmental Health (--- ' ° 0 ° 0 8. Land & Shoreline Use 0 C 1 ° . ° ° 9. Housing ./L � 0 ° f° 10. Aesthetics L, ° ° 11. Light & Glare t`r ° ° 112 . Recreation ° f, a °- 113 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ✓''Lr ° 1 0 ° ° 14 . Transportation v'' ° ° I0 0 0 15. Public Services ° I ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: 1 I I I I We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have exPertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1 ; ii ,'') 1��.4 /(/ /I//, CI Signature of (Director or A thorized Representative Date ' j �� � Rev. 6/88 I 1 1 _. REM__ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL_'___ZTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 090-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 090-88 ( PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval ( (administrative) to construct a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with Land Use and Comprehensive Plan Map zoning designations. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: II ENGINEERING DIVISION _TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE I ' LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN 1WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY ,DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: /';J r c—__. I - APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS >KNOT APPROVED / 1 ZI /; �"1-2f,-� i 'r:'1 a r:^, G� (:fr'1 d . t,-le �..t (,`�'EG�''0n_ �t �"'�:- Gam. ,Q / 5 'I l 9 /� II 2Y ! / DATE /// / k/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECT/ R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / I . / REV. 6/88 II �/ • A REN_.__. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Dl___`ZTMENT p o y,,y ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE �,°L o'�9F'19 oS REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: %nve,�r11 �e -79 Qpn (5)8 DATE CIRCULATED: _10/27/88 COMMENTS DUE:_11/7/88 v� ECF 090-88. ✓� APPLICATION NO(S) : _SA-090-88 PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Applicant seeks administrative site plan • approval to develop a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with La Use and Comprehensive Map zoning designations for the subject parcel. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. i SITE AREA .23 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :2,000 sq ft footprin approximately. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth x ° 2 . Air 0 X ° - ° ° . 3 . Water x 0 ° . ° ° 4 . Plants 0 .x ° . ° ° 5. Animals ° x ° ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources a > ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use 0y ° o ° ° 9. Housing X ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics X ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare X ° ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° X ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation X ° ° 14 . Transportation ° • X ° ° . ° . 15. Public Services ° x ° ° ° . ° 16. Utilities aX a ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ' /Alixits:7 17744, d444-21 -704.6e6/ //eze„e/i_. &J-- v Ilse Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 , RENT-- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DLJ TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 090-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 090-88 PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval (administrative) to construct a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with Land Use and Comprehensive Plan Map zoning designations. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: (�61�E i��1.4.(r APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS x NOT APPROVED a'lrg izvap_37. 2-60W1.-era171 DPI t o ill*_14) _ __-ya7 ea, i`c ; DATE C 1'ir FA� M58. SIGNATURE 0 IRECTOR OR A THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 I j, P. AN Oc�O �REN___T COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Dr,.rtRTMENT0 c� N/1/ovFNro ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C uor DATE CIRCULATED: 10/27/88 COMMENTS DUE: 11/7/88hi) ECF 090-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-090-88 PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Applicant seeks administrative site plan approval to develop a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with La Use and Comprehensive Map zoning designations for the subject parcel. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. SITE AREA . 23 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :2 , 000 sq ft footprin approximately. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: - Novvio.--r di wAs DON8 W ) Ili 1 eh Appblo/dloki 6 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. O'eA '\- , /1/4-AMbi ) 1— I — 8S Signature of Director of Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 REN'. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 090-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 090-88 PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval (administrative) to construct a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with Land Use and Comprehensive Plan Map zoning designations. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 10))r , ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION -t, 6 Ppp ICA-I IOIU PLANNING DIVISION Fbi`' h17Mlivis1MM`I (06d \�\SHORT RANGE )i Th PLAN /fop� A L 0 LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Pb,N 1VI(V�/J )IVIS NJ APPROVED XAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED )01-\Y1-10 'PgA\Ic Pi,k1<if uo-r sHOuLAO ►3 r 26L.CCA`( tccTu AL pRopOW L I N E 1t p1 o-u-f Io Ism Pr& rkoincl Vo-hcL NN)O 3n IZ 5JO 3 Chou vl euo LA-woSGApart,6 0 i- 1-'1,603c Ap JY1.)(o O Iv T 16 L INNOScA Jt (Q Nq P I\)c s W LLD ?* I nJ c izzAs o (-0 I rit t 00l�i�i Il/�C� PL 1 1) i'vi f T I ►�t, uu s-i ofoiD c/r s 1jt ((J1lass kkzcA) 15 rvcrj (ici 06ICIh C i? -f gRRA( 0 MJO LhIkiO Ip D 7 C Pklio OR OCKIrU(6 AOl w Poz- t PS. -if)tYl , 31-16 Flanoislfafrubl r-6 PROo l oW, I • pi L, 'MOLE. rEkvc;H -SCNTifuG, '/Ca DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Vcr r�Pl�l,l c Al lo A% 1 s 'TO �.r� PL'( �-� ITIf j�m6 �I n1 I�5 I I'v� 8 I'� � Pg 11)1\ic b APPRou, at"; 5-25-66i ° V J 53(.0-- LAi-, ) I-8 - 2 8 1988 r/). .e 1 • riCi, ,.... ,, 91 �C T REND_- ! COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DJ _-RTML+iT eenton Fire oe�. Pneventon BUN?, E C E Q d E VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIE aiQ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I V'C. FreIex1c5-r\. 14 i(-gii vL I DATE CIRCULATED: _10/27/88 COMMENTS DUE: a' — Fff L .h ECF 090-88 ,CIC aIYJ E,- APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-090-88 t.Q PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Applicant seeks administrative site plan approval to develop a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with La Use and Comprehensive Map zoning designations for the subject parcel. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. SITE AREA .23 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :2 , 000 sq ft footprin approximately. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° O ° 0 2 . Air ° 0 0 0 3 . Water ° ° o 0 0 4. Plants ° ° 0 0 0 ,5. Animals ° O 0 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 0 0 0 7 . Environmental Health ° ° 0 O 0 0 18 . Land & Shoreline Use ° O 0 0 1 19. Housing ° o ° o 10. Aesthetics ° O 0 0 11. Light & Glare ° O 0 0 12 . Recreation ° O 0 0 J3 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° i 0 0 0 14. Transportation ° o ° ' 15. Public Services 0 �° ° ° 16. Utilities ° ; COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,4#14-r-re id2c: ,,e/ /9d Signature of Director or Authorized Representative. Date Rev. 6/88 • RENriuly COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 090-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 090-88 PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval (administrative) to construct a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with Land Use and Comprehensive Plan Map zoning designations. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:: - APPROVED `� APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department ccess roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 2,2SO is required. ' _ hydrants with a minimum flow of / gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within /5 ' -_•_ feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within ,300 feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes "No • /�� %' � DATE �1) /7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 // (0V/,19/iV 4 ' t2'4-`)/° ' REQU I RFI) FIRE FLOC! CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME -../4A1AS '`` ,,X1 U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS 7/cS—._S'4,/v_ — & )P / , FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION_- CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: • TOTAL BUILDING AREA: / f " 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE ill, USING AREA (A): /. 7$O GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: )./.3.7. GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): - CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 1 3 ( - ,5- GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: _` GPM (E) CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF CD): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH ADD -?. 5-- % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST 79 ' ADD /0 % • 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH • .J ADD 'S- % 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST yz_ ADD /s % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : ,75— % CTOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: 9 S W. 3%- GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: • CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM (G) i`).. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN I_-25-000 GPM, INSERT 12,e30 GPM) (�`7 75 (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: 2 -2 5... ) GPM (H) U . SIGNED: 1F11-G01- I aTE (AY": ji,. /9 eff REN1..... COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE.:.—tTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1 yu.whinDATE CIRCULATED: 10/27/88 COMMENTS DUE: 11 7 88 88 ILANN'NG ECF 090-88 cITYOFRENTSI N APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-090-88 D OCT _2? :i988 PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay ES c E I lli PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex u BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _Applicant seeks administrative site plan approval to develop a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with La Use and Comprehensive Map zoning designations for the subject parcel. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. SITE AREA .23 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 2 , 000 sq ft footprin approximately. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9. Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: 74-62,6 .2.cc . y6,jl"� __, ,,2r%t Z�c-.-f'' Lilt - - ar.�-t./f) g �� a�, `.r C A-: 4-e---°'=€ --- /2-- D 7 -F 7 /, C P e_._ ga_e_.-e eee,./__c:p4e,! 4/_c> s---/-6-t—&- 4_4) _/C-4- --bl5P- 7 ) We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas whic we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are ere ad itional ,i ormation is needed to properly assess this propoal. /X� (0 Z 7-PS Signature of Director or- Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 REND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEF....I'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW s}JEET lt4NNING DIVISION ECF 0 9 0 8 8 CRY OFRENTON APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 090-88 ® OCT rii) 27 2988 PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay ! (( /j g EIT PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex L� iJ BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval (administrative) to construct a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with Land Use and Comprehensive Plan Map zoning designations. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. TO: PUBLIC. WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE y, LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED _449/3/2,e5--(1-4--e czZe C e-o 72 ) IG ;24 DATE NATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REN__ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL___RTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: u;tai DATE CIRCULATED: 10 27/88 COMMENTS DUE:/ 11/7/88 ECF 090-88 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-090-88 PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks administrative site plan approval to develop a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with La Use and Comprehensive Map zoning designations for the subject parcel. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. SITE AREA . 23 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :2 , 000 sg ft footprin approximately. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° o ° 0 2 . Air ° . . ° 3 . Water ° 0 ° O 0 ° 4. Plants ° 0 0 O ° 0 5. Animals ° ° o 0 ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9 . Housing 0 __.--------- 0 o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° O ° ° 11. Light & Glare 0 ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° o ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: u l' 4 4:,( ) ,. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where add' ional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,,,, (__ bla,„______ /(D -? Sig e of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENT_ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE._ATMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 090-88 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 090-88 PROPONENT: James W. Dalpay PROJECT TITLE: Dalpay Four-Plex BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval ' (administrative) to construct a four-plex. Proposed development is consistent with Land Use and Comprehensive Plan Map zoning designations. LOCATION: 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: R �.�. APPROVED APPROVED WITH. CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED OL-pC C-es 01, (›KeFe_. G '� jakAr DATE Ka- SIGNATURE OF D R TOR OR AUTHORIZ e D REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 • } TTER OF TRANSMITT FROM: - • 0•.1) . ----LIZ)k- : Arjrted— i4c7 DATE:F /<445JOB NO -- ( 110 ter Al-b-e-C- 10 — ek RE: 54 t "2. 2-(o 04--0 446-,661.4),t„.., � -- '� I r TO: ..I�u 4 FV1c, 5� 41610 �15 - � 1' . 1��� �'� ADDRESS: 1JL.t; (1 gt"‘'s- r--- U CITY: ,C1.ltrt.rvid(11 UL t-v t ATTENTION: PLEASE BE ADVISED: WE ARE SEN G YOU ❑ ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING: PRINTS ❑ PLANS ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS ❑ SAMPLES ❑ SPECIFICATIONS ❑ ARTWORK ❑ PROOFS ❑ PHOTOGRAPHS ❑ COPY OF LETTER ❑ CHANGE ORDER a1:2„g/Lt..41.4,vv..,s C NO. D TE COPIES DESCRIPTION 1 A- I 11°Agiiii/ .7 i---re_. HP 6,..„,....... 12,2)44,Lek_ 2 6_1 1o/9 7 6 � cl 31-"_—) /P1 1 �.�,,,...ei„ -t-0/ (P ..`, 11 4 144* 1 aQ,"...- 1/2"- )4--- gau-d-vs\-- ek-- _z_e-el el-i-- --, 5 *S6' ,`` 17)A, p-4.-3.--ff I _ ley i THESE ARE BEING TRANSMITTED AS INDICATED BELOW: IS REQUESTED El APPROVED AS IS ❑ SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION ❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ APPROVED WITH CORRECTIONS ❑ RETURN CORRECTED ❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ RETURNED WITH CORRECTIONS ❑ RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US ❑ FOR YOUR COMMENTS ❑ RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL ❑ Cl FOR BID(S) DUE COMMENTS: SIGNED: TOPS?FORM 3805 LITHO IN U.S.A. ORIGINAL /- `' ; %o CITY OF RENTON NIL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION October 3 , 1988 James W. Dalpay P.O. Box 2436 Renton, Washington 98056 RE: Dalpay Site Plan Approval, 715 Sunset Boulevard N.E. (SA-090-88) Dear Mr. Dalpay: We have received the above-referenced application and have completed a preliminary review of the proposed project. In order to proceed further with evaluation of your application, we must have the following materials: 1. A revised vicinity map (see enclosed instructions) . 2 A revised site plan which includes: a) relocation of the proposed structures approximately ten (10) feet toward the western property line; and b) provision of a front yard area, including landscaping and amenities (e.g. patios) , to the east of the structures in the area made available by the proposed westerly relocation. W-3 . A typical floor plan for the proposed residential structures. 4 . re ised landscaping plan which includes: a) a ten -y foot landscape strip on the east side of the CJjA— parking area; b) a landscaped front yard area to the immediate east of the residential development; an c) a more e- nd-s-c-ape buf of r to screen t a development from the commercial area to the south of the subject site. ------- 5. A notarized copy of the document giving proof of the City's granting of a Variance for the proposed five (5) foot side yards for the subject project. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 I \ / � J I , James W. Dalpay SA-090-88 October 3, 1988 Page 2 6. A notarized copy of the document which describes the covenants established in conjunction with the City action to rezone the subject property to R-3 , Medium Density Residential Use, which require that site plan approval be obtained prior to development of the property. If we receive the above-listed materials by October 21, 1988 we will immediately resume processing of your application. If we do not receive this information by that date, we may return your application, having found that it lacks sufficient relevant information to be accepted at this time. In the latter case you would have to resubmit when the necessary materials are available. If you have any questions, please contact me or Lenora Blauman of my staff, at 235-2550. S� rely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/lb:mjp Enclosure I/ GEORGE W. sheet no. project by LUCKER ARCHITECT location date job no. 140 RAINIER AVE.S. client checked RENTON,WA 98055 206-226-0404 date p /I �. �6p .. .-_ 1tr. k :zincii rn D24,1" .-, , . : ;_ ' cal '' .-- -C4-1A . . Vl ,� S L-�� GtN. . mVa�� I , Y Is-- sunk , Q se-cQ; ' - Il C�-�l d�►' 'Cos + _ _ .-- -_ .. -- - -- ._ -- , _,... .7, ._., . ..!, .\/.._I or(..; . ' ,_. , Vt , , , . , . , , ,, . „ . .., .. ..9 ' I r j' -1,Le 2 a - i fdf- 11. , , i _ 1 _ ... __ , __.. ..„ to_. I ' V2-X1,4 ir�� '--dr in s: . G. II 7/ 6, 3 a4'z -- CITY O'F-Rci+1TO)I - -- ' ( 1' r__ .(J arra+ c ' ' w _-. r• (� rff r`'/( t , • ‘fvY O CTTY • OF RENTO T FILE NO(S): Si -•4. '88 BUDDING & ZONING DEPARTM_.._IT rB MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is o comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of applications) are to'be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) ' . APPLICANT • TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME - JAMES W. DALPAY FEES Q REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS P.O. BOX 2436 EJ SPECIAL PERMIT* TEMPORARY PERMIT* CITY REN ONE WA. 98056 ZIP ® CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE I[ I A SITE PLAN APPROVAL 300 226-6363 Q SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* _ From See ction: * Justification Required NAME SAME ,; ADDRESS • SUBDIVISIONS: SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP 0 TENTATIVE PLAT Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE - � FINAL PLAT L-J WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: • JAMES W. DALPAY y ADDRESS P.O. BOX 2436 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: ' El PRELIMINARY CITY 1:21RENTON, WA. 98056 P FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE . 226-6363 0 Residential Q Industrial aCommercial 0 Mixed : LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS • 715 NXS. SUNSET BLVD. N.E. ED TENTATIVE EXISTING`, PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY R-3 FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: ~ CONSTRUCT FOUR—FLEX • NUMBER OF SPACES: . • I 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ', SQ. FT. ACRES AREA': V- i0,000.00 *i- 0.23 iyA I p f 83 a TOTAL FEES —�: _.ra8 STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE TA}j (;.) (d ;,',IL j1 I,' ,j APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: F�wick, L I, ,6 ,,'SN, 42-,jBr;,6 C m� APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: y �.d �Jh,`' CI Accepted :,LF.'„:::':GU ON((tii [)EPT. ® Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: 6t 1 0(, APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: I0 Accepted Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: Building Design Eng. Fire 170 Parks ' liel Police Policy Dev. Traffic Eng. lI Utilities REVISED 1-31-84 d IP 11111 u Legal description of property (if more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). • THE NORTH FIFTY (50) DEEP OF TRACT TWO (2) HARRIES GARDEN HOME TRACTS, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 34 OF PLATS, PAGE 38, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, KING. 1 AFFIDAVIT 1, JAMES W. DALPAY being duly sworn, declare that I. am, 0 authorized representative to act for the property owner,®owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRD AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ri o�C2 DAY OF AUGUST , I;� 19 .88 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF II ti WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT it (Nam(of Notary ublic) (.3-a (Signature of caner) 60 x o o� ) /�Ajo, ?tip (Ad0�. l" I (Address) 'S �G - oaa (Address) s 5� G ci4 / / 9rô (City) (State) (Zip) I' 2XCP6L3CP- (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 i • • ORDINANCE NO. 4 146 Exhibit "A" THE NORTH 50 FEET OF TRACT 2, HARRIES GARDEN HOMES TRACTS ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 34 OF PLATS, PAGE 38, RECORDS OF RING COUNTY. • WASHINGTON. • CITY OF RE NTO'I SEP 121988 BUI!DING/Z'OI' 4NG GEORGE W. sheet no. project by LUCKER ARCHITECT location date job no. 140 RAINIER AVE.S. client checked RENTON.WA 98055 206-226-0404 date G 1 a{ e n-ba-v1 `Phoi d►n9 and 2onri/3 Dept IRE St1-e cl ah Approval a pllcai loo For tJntt rftino_J � F vrlitl 'i - IS Sur75ef I5Ivd r Jamoi Qalp10 - ow► +''. �'ta-fed ►vi \la r tah ce. Appl r cd:rho V \/53(e- as i-eeT1,Ie n6 of -4or each Sty v a rd , In-len-f, 15 'fio c1,2_vet off, St L t�.s MI a -fur until a Ktiivieieit of ho mom -lfan o Itprite5 avid c + ' ►(Y1lntrYW tmpa.et u rn surrounciiii3 Ft-opttheA. 11 laved 05Q 3 palin-thile vnotA1 wruw, o- Si x wetfiiij units, ' (ct is narrow, (5DQ, dap, C2 oof') 5lopi we5-E.. ( t �J11S4 �1�- 1405. and P L 21 t1t$ o-( ways l to uvesb Oesij. use', e -F-ab 11 s{� h orti any L awe 5uv6&t 131d. , A 1 © f uI- 004 uhdP,✓vL I_ Park-I►13 IS acl fs.Akt Zayled b-I . • fbpi -f dUP2 16 U C105 e 40 exls+ih racLe A reirviinlvio G► hn - b 51te Sc f ack - . horfti 11► .Wa lS �Ia � "�'^ -- (p62 ry t L414,t,a s ca�Or►nl a -fT�-� �zse -f 2 v� +k re5J +aI u . Pp4aLnI g Wadtt are r usher) 4--D inn-awl-ham Fdrkihs areet jradzs .eir cod.-e_ , -Ia mob ferr161' cg r-lein,f8.4 awe ,stdAlt- t ut, t. U-E(111 ' -1- . GLIr1.6m I -f e 1 vt idti a5 1z-1 L -t- ZI►e 66 � -� w g►� � Va rl owe, , r-e5 u I-t;ed (IA Grn Aett raeh frn u 1-t r-�uvh t,Iy cue v I n � 5!h5 S Cat I- and fOrriiit's rect 6nct,,Le. Cd ri p rn 1 s e MIr--t-41+9A-W4.08 04 Could f9,G cfni c ( n K ) S E P 121988 ipt e UILDING/ZONliVG DEPT. A • -• • . . -.....„ • • •r • • '� •' :1 ' NANNO'▪ • 146, Q ..j� l • ,1. • • . b` \� • V. ▪ :4r,1.t�•'• • • •,{, . .-'. • ••, ti G 't\-7.1.-- 0 ....14rf...... ..;;;;;,•,qtAii" _,, 11 '...:1•711.4•4•J'r ( G \ • /�`� • ^,`.�Y. 1� +t•Y t,,• •J• � f •�a• �•• — �j r` ::,;�: ;� r•. t)r,4 0. '� P:9_3r_s z e �O _ \tip, •.: ..•.. •t•▪ • :' .•. :'! :A.-c' :•••1 ss - — Jf .,if .;r.. b053 1 •r _.� • .fit. 6�?.a+L�r:►�., -. . • -.. :. .- ::: \Y .�.: cam• ,, •... • • .•• '1• ..�t:` .•{,as,,., ..y�•:�.;.,.tr. "I.;,.• . • ,. 1• . ,'• ,♦ •.« Imo• S • 4. ,, '.r••,.t./41ib��l1.Ifr'•1• ':1, 1'�.•.•'+(�•1• h • • - •r••• %.:••▪ • : • •4..... t% 4.1•r. r • • Y -t . :t' •,•�':•t$y:.: .•.'•:I; '....•r:4 •/. .::-•" '`;10QW •j1d•1 ...:..5 / •n.T 1. . • YZ 961 _r_ •, • . • ,. =jR:''Y1 ,,•' ••••••l •4:R:r•r,i•C,G:•:�: !^ 7 0+c' ic; ' • .. n ' ••,•� 264.82,- • • ...7 •4 .7:..1 ./. . ,.. ., . ,. 1• .. 4) * ,; •,• �8 6.' a`lf :¢:.�i���,• A'�S�� �¢• '{'•'. t�''t' w:f. 1. �. /_• , t .. t•'•„! ' ,l'r � `0� ._ • 'Ns-, My •i•l ..,..5^ ..'4. •�' .1'.1•• • i1 • '••r••• a "' •1O :4 .,•. • i 1:.:,(.! .K+:..,'1 ?••••:• +�'.•:a.:•••.••• .l••.I'•.•�. ,.....46.'� f•.. t•••• 6 ,, r r.A" ••Y AT.. .1�� n•.• / v`lp•t• ,r ..1• n•..'•N'*Ay•Y..•"17i1G':11,., Air' .t.�: ...1•.•►.'.3•.• • /I TO '1 .•, .7 M`- .y • ..., h:'1*'1'. :il•:.in la-•Tit•.ti '••~+''f i. �y�p1 •�a _ 4, 0 +.iw.rl.r. • i� •t+..7 .t' '. .•.;W ..,.a, :it:..•'1' •\.::1i{ni.'w,i� ��0•.! •• 6•• • •SC • 0 • �'' •��� ,.�1c•c., % .0••• ./• .V. • �'• r•�fr.• fit t•:'.•�`'''•' 'I• '1'• '� "� r " L \ 13-.4:, . V 11 . , ••1 ..l r • ?:}' •+My.,•.1;,�(" ▪ .�' , V/ pit. •01 , 4. o1ps •• } ...••.w'�1. , • i'ii .P • )w•'�' :r. • 003 w• *• •1 •oar I.. • .• 14 •• :: ,. • O• ••• q/ li: 00 1: I to•• 9. •• ;• •� �• .:-... i A. E- • oo inn', .Pijiff al • • ft.. • - • -•-r •••24,::.•; ••'n"..4l•:.: ' ::00.16:411..;° ‘114.1..;. 1. ; • ,(•.'':,:• . . ...4. 41 -. -60°.II VII •III A 4 4 /1:5c, • • oiso , .z,,.. .., . .„, •4 ar \ ,. iir;. ... .. . P.1 WA 4 � . ' 17 .: .. ...,,,L,T. , i • ' i • ... ▪ 9 1 4214 1 ��� 1' '. - . A 1--og-;1 ..• ,H: .`• ' ; t _ .1,• >.f4.4►. ; ••rsi 3:,q.1,1"40.1••: `_ • •y I .p. i:, y, ..:-'.....6,- .t1, , , • .. .+4'.. `. 1. J.11.... ••. • ,�1•t ••• 1• M 4L �•r �tIj; .�,'•,.' O\I C'� '1•' • •we. 4)• • • f'. • •tVG:7.:Jl• 77,F10:3;•I. .0. i. `� (¢C„ fF •f If` • "• f � •a•• ,•....1.,. k t .M":J. i•:.f^IT E,r.,., •i.- i .t• � \ OQ `i yI �•• � 4. I• •st % o W , o ,•OC,a t. •r'J.oc:.,,:;;, '' LL _ .c • I. ... • `•� a.'�- foible. ,.. I f - "1[ ..• 4. atI. , .r ..•.figs+.:;:• • .:••.• :• S•• p•:a. • .r.' :.:' ,, ;;.•swJin J ••'$1: '`•N:i'7'R' •4r• :, § I �..i: h•r SS': '::;:.t• ,i. •:,,:.5::'►n 'P y +• • .: 7 I ry • • • . .0• .......• /A •4.4 it '1� .,1• ', .r ••f:.�'1 •i2 ji •" •: IU •r1. •i• ''•• •• -'' • - ' �'t- `P.!.:t'• ir'.j'7 t".•J• .w'. , S •y�•., r •w•k1Ao_ t.+t 6'7: '.••••.;.i••• . 54...'kee.,r :4_,...-.1•(..4.1;!1,...., Itio.z.'..• . ;.1,,, . -1.. • •, .. . i I 74:77,-.. •.:-. • h•• : gull �e.• ' 1,44,i ...Z. 0 r. I''r'.. rr I R a,r 1 i. t xv so. �� ' _:�t'► L t r. ' � CC,i,, +}, 4. '',•;x ,,: CITY OF RENTON •• .• • .•. f'' '".r.t..t[•t :ti ".••• • •t .';o if���•1i; i'• r �, D[rAEiTM[HT OP trY[LIC WORKS • ' kit• • i. .. . •••••••. 4 '...1•. •,' :.•:''' •::.". /ea. ••. .1- sui••••• YI • • / • rYi • .. .. , onuNso DATE,/dldsR ems wo ?72 8i• iki .661. PAGE, , . , ,, /`- r°' a o ,. , A TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY • =-:, '! ' . ` 4-t=`:cam` -. R�LiL({�£�. - : -- Gam• ��� ;• , VOL 356 -'' It I � PA -38fi7.�eQ.. OF Dew$,,<•. � a:.'' ' - b © LIES+ oF •r, : ;'.�. o qo APR•. 6 �: o to o Form ii I . StatutoryWarrant Deed: y- "; THE GRANTOR L. J.. .DALPAY and HAZEL' 'ANN .DALPAY,: ':hi s'•-'wif. for and in consideration-of With love And 'af ect - - , f . i-on - .- - - - ., in hand paid, conveys,and warrants to. 'JAb4ES:: W. DALPAY , "a: ;single. ` " - `mari ' 'l i' the followin described rea estate; situated in.the County.of Ki- g � ate.of' :Washington: 1 The North'•f t ., if y' eef �.of trac•t :awo 2 - :`''F`• Harries Garden Home Tracts, accordingt,o " :r , plat. `thereof recorded in' -volume .311- ••o:f- ' ,. < :,,,, „`..'; p:lats, :Page, 38,, records'.of:',-said,:.count• . ..,:` . , '' ,',;;' 1 g ..__.,_ .. .....�._.-.-, ,• - _ .-.. ..ewe'--a'.e-.«-.+• .,e--.Y�..r-wa.-*' .Frri,- s"."7.•r+c(,vA 7'.7.n.% ..�..;..7 cz9:^..^*: r,'� P�en;1. c's'( O .` .W,'C4--fie . 41d,i • , �q, 8 i n;,' G. APR.. c ,;v��,, c„3 1 /..w R TRUER .. da of 'i Dated this , 91' th�. Y. A _ - -::"....1.'---s'-..''''':1'.1.:'.'-',.'''.';'::-.:';','::1'ii.. ..4').':''''''''';'-''''-'i',:l'''';'..":.'::':T''''''.'1' ,KS'.! ' ' - ' ' • ,�(' w. V' ,t_r Fran % OF WASHINGTON STATE -,, s. 5; • t o f King .County Of , s On this day personally,appeared before me ;,,,,,r r'' 3:v"';_ Fq I L. J. 'Dal ay- and•' Hai k1-iA�i ;...p•alpay his wif la• to me known to be the individual ,sdescr'hed z1 r• d.,4J4,�etecuted the within ',and foregoing'instrument,''and,.;' '' .» ' acknowledged that' they " - signed th ; tYi�� ;'``' Y,, .• . h• 0.`"~",n'• •'_t„li:e ;r free and; ,-,voluntary ,th, ;:.,:., - act.and'deed��foi e':`�'`' 'uses and purposes therein' mentioned. ,.,.. ;' . ` m hand'and official.seal=.tli' da '.of' - . :A Aril`, ,,19 .b,' GIVEN undery. ,..' '�, ., ', a;v` Y, P 5„ r '.' .' z • ! "'',j'a �'i�+i`'i;;.` No ary.Public in and for.`the`State of:'Washin ton, ' . ''residing,at .: .Renton,.:.. i, .. .._�:-..L6', ....wr�,,.,...r.... au �'IL:.Ac.._....a............._..r:�,�......:....C..... 1 - rw:yJ- •