Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA89-112 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 5 1 0 6 7
Kathleen Hoover ,being first duly sworn on oath states
that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the
VALLEY DAILY NEWS
• Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition
DT.ily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers
are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six
months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published
in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King
County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for
King County.
The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition
Renton Edition x x , Auburn Edition , (and not in
sµPplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers •
during the below stated period. The annexed notice a P Ub i i c N o t i c A
(Notice of Public Hearing) R4125
was published on May 4 . 1990
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the
sum of
Subscribed and sworn before me this 21 s t day of May 19 9 0
,‘;e7
tary Public for the State of Washington
residing at Auburn,
King County, Washington
VON N87 Revised 4/89
PLANNING DIVISIOh1
CITY OF RENTON
JUL 161990
7 i I \. 371 A__ c.:-._/...,.---
/ i/. / , /./.'/:7' . !
)) //:..(-•'<, / •/ 4 _
' /A00* ,
17
s� x 33 i ••�,----....
` X�7 17 X 7 •1' k
Je
---„,_____, L________.
--1.-1". 110.•........-„:,---- _/
( MONSTER \\ ROAD) .,��Z�? \\
,lt
/ t
V\IX..._.1
N'N\I ------........
L )r" f. v
i_jJ
7 1
i , -� --�'� � ., `� ; -- , \ -- ... ----t---..-► ..
, \\ cI-,___._,____, _i__,_,_____T____, ,,,,
_,\ i
.,--2*-.:4,,,
• I-oWe_R FASI tJ 1 i I 4. „t
- ' \\ . \
,, • \\\: •
•-, / . %\ \ k\
; 1 ' _ •-•-••--...... I i 11
\\ \ '
411-
\ i 1, \1--'- ,,,,s/
1.
.: \ Ix uX 7 (i • .4........-41.ilk,
qk. i 1 , \\
7 i/ 10,---- ----, _ —.t.
). Isoi \ i „7IlAt'
\ \
t \; `� � ' ' // _JL` i'
III, 1
.4 N..• .s. \ . \ , s es. 7 (71 / ,,,----•--._.::-:..—---.7--=-T-----'1.----------" --• --''''' -----Ji: IV\ S'
/ 1--•-...i..... N .. , -....... i )
il
r i --—
\ x 9 1() \ _II
.J 1LI , ,\,, t -_-;•— 1/ : ,, .._ . 1.
• 4, s , A l'\
1 pa] /itti \\
\ I
tf ---. i Olik( '- ' 1\
1 . (
t _ ,, • .. .„ .',c1.-: tf,
it
X14 r . f 1 ��\\ \\
► L \ 1 I / 1 ` [1 /
t. ^ ' Y\ J J � \ i 1 4+�r 1
). --'i '1)s , .-.— , '... -- /// /II:
�\ f • .\ K / ) , �� II I
- \
S� ( ), . ,TG. t9'•i GVw IS --be, I- I FoFc›T ; k ( , \ \ / .!-i%= .� i i i
oos b8-415 4./ S:r) I` - •� � u, - ,i�r. = • ___
- .
�` �`�- % j i . �X, 15 01 E.L, 41 2¢((1.10A,F Revr), �// �
4So1 EI..'L4-2 (D '1%; ' 4, . 11‘14„ ,'
b0` EL, St-tie Co.S% PIP ) �
..``_� \ \•. j y/•• / .. - 1
--\....
lele° Et-, ib-to(0.-72%4;,g 5v) 32 ,2_-z .\ / ,7,/I .-- .--- t . \
,r
' CULT. F I EL'D `t, �•I ty %/// J
I yt I %� j , • X 32
-= _-- \\. 1 1 i// I X
•. , -- ..-..,\ ----,,,,......., ;\ 1
.,,.....,..,:„.„:....z.,......,..•
. . , , ,„ . , F ,
X22 \\ /%' - / \ \ ---- S
t
ti
/' / 1 X 2 7 ' \\\
X \ \.. 2J
\ 23 \ i I \\
/ /, X19 .\ ?, \ \
. / / 8/
\ A ' \
. , 1\ G ) ' 1\\\\\''' '.. --
\\ \ \
C U LT. FIELD \ �'\ \',t' p• X \\� \ \\
/r \ \� y� tt \ \ •
PREPARED FOR
BRUCE BLUME AND ASSOCIATES
Vab dda&O-e
Nabil T. Dbaibo
Project Engineer BEN Mq
\ G oti WASNA,
GI=A Mann, P.E. cc
4,
Vice President max*er, ��srE �
SiONAI.E‘k
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
OAKSDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST
RENTON, WASHINGTON
E-4563
September 27, 1989
Earth Consultants, Inc.
1805 - 136th Place Northeast
Suite 101
Bellevue, Washington 98005
(206) 643-3780
222 East 26th Street, Suite 103
Tacoma, Washington 98411-9998
(206) 272-6608
TABLE OF CONTENTS
E-4563
Page
INTRODUCTION 1
Project Description 1
Scope of Services 1
SITE CONDITIONS 2
Surface 2
Subsurface 2
Groundwater 3
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3
General 3
Site Preparation and General Earthwork 5
Foundations 6
Dock-High Retaining Walls 7
Slab-on-Grade Floors 8
Settlements 8
Surcharge Program 9
Excavations and Slopes 11
Rockeries 11
Site Drainage 12
Utility Support 13
Pavement Areas 14
• LIMITATIONS 15
Additional Services 15
Appendix A - Field Exploration
Appendix B - Laboratory Testing
Appendix C - Rockery Guideline
Earth Consultants, Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS (con't)
ILLUSTRATIONS
Plate 1 Vicinity Map
Plate 2 Test Pit and Boring Location Plan
Plate 3 Legend
Plates 4 through 6 Boring Logs
Plates 7 through 15 Test Pit Logs
Plates 16 through 17 Grain Size Analyses
Plate 18 Atterberg Limits Test Data
Plate 19 Retaining Wall Drainage and Backfill
Plate 20 Typical Monitoring Plate Detail
Plate 21 Schematic Structural Fill
Plate 22 Typical Footing Subdrain Detail
Earth Consultants, Inc.
C -�rt Earth Consultants Inc.
�I lkii Geotechnical Engineers,Geologists&Environmental Scientists
September 27, 1989 E-4563
_ Mr. Jim Garrison
Bruce Blume and Company
1100 Eastlake, Suite 210
Seattle, Washington 98109
Dear Mr. Garrison:
We are pleased to submit herewith our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Eland
Distribution Facility, Oaksdale Avenue Southwest, Renton, Washington." This report
presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering
analyses. The purpose and scope of our study was outlined in our July 19, 1989 proposal.
Our study indicates that the site is underlain by soft compressible material consisting
predominantly of clayey silts to a depth of approximately eleven (11) feet.
Based on the encountered conditions, and the results of our analyses, we believe that the
proposed structures can be supported on conventional footings provided that a surcharge
program is first satisfactorily completed.
These recommendations, along with other geotechnically related aspects of the project, are
discussed in more detail in the text of the attached report.
We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you during this initial phase of
project development, and we look forward to working with you in the future phases as the
project comes to fruition. In the meantime, should you or your consultants have any
. questions about the content of this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please call.
Very truly yours,
EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC.
L---/
Glen Mann, P.E.
Vice President
GM/NTD/sar
1805.136th Place N.E.,Suite 101, Bellevue,Washington 98005
222 E.26th Street, Suite 101,Tacoma,Washington 98411-9998
Bellevue(206)643-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(206)746.0860 Tacoma(206)272-6608
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
ABOUT YOUR
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about
face conditions than any other factor. As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions,-their likely reaction to
subsurface problems can be, their frequency and extent proposed construction activity, and appropriate founda-
have been lessened considerably in recent years,due in tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual
large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist,
The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how
the Geosciences. qualified,and no subsurface exploration program, no
matter how comprehensive,can reveal what is hidden by
The following suggestions and observations are offered
to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, earth, rock and time.The actual interface between mate-
cost-overruns and other costly headaches that can rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report
occur during a construction project. indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may
differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the
unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their
A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their
REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnical consultants through the construction stage, to iden-
tify variances, conduct additional tests which may be
OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed, and to recommend solutions to problems
encountered on site.
A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur-
face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
set of project-specific factors. These typically include:
the general nature of the structure involved, its size and CAN CHANGE
configuration; the location of the structure on the site
and its orientation; physical concomitants such as Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly-
access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities, changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi-
and the level of additional risk which the client assumed neering report is based on conditions which existed at
by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory the time of subsurface exploration, construction decisions
program. To help avoid costly problems, consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose
geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo-
j which change subsequent to the date of the report may technical consultant to learn if additional tests are
affect its recommendations. advisable before construction starts.
Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and
otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not natural events such as floods,earthquakes or ground-
be used: water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions
•When the nature of the proposed structure is and,thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical
changed, for example, if an office building will be report. The geotechnical engineer should be kept
erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refriger- apprised of any such events, and should be consulted to
ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- determine if additional tests are necessary
frigerated one;
•when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE
structure is altered; PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES
•when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS
structure is modified;
•when there is a change of ownership, or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet
•for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals. A report pre-
Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade-
which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor, or even some other
ered in their report's development have changed. consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise,
this report was prepared expressly for the client involved
and expressly for purposes indicated by the client. Use
MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose,or by the client
ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi-
vidual other than the client should apply this report for its
Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical
only at those points where samples are taken,when engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose
they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring
sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer.
!I
A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING der the mistaken impression that simply disdaiming re-
REPORT IS SUBJECT TO sponsibility for the accuracy of subsurface information
always insulates them from attendant liability. Providing
MISINTERPRETATION the best available information to contractors helps pre-
Costly problems can occur when other design profes- vent costly construction problems and the adversarial
sionals develop their plans based on misinterpretations attitudes which aggravate them to disproportionate
of a geotechnical engineering report.'Ib help avoid scale.
these problems,the geotechnical engineer should be
retained to work with other appropriate design profes- READ RESPONSIBILITY I
sionals to explain relevant geotechnical findings and to CLAUSES CLOSELY li
review the adequacy of their plans and specifications
relative to geotechnical issues. Because geotechnical engineering is based extensively ,
on judgment and opinion,it is far less exact than other
design disciplines. This situation has resulted in wholly
unwarranted daims being lodged against geotechnical 1
BORING LOGS SHOULD NOT BE consultants.To help prevent this problem,geotechnical
engineers have developed model dauses for use in writ-
SEPARATED FROM THE ten transmittals.These are not exculpatory clauses
ENGINEERING REPORT designed to foist geotechnical engineers' liabilities onto 1
someone else. Rather,they are definitive clauses which
Final boring logs are developed by geotechnical engi- identify where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities 1
neers based upon their interpretation of field,logs begin and end.Their use helps all parties involved rec-
(assembled by site personnel)and laboratory evaluation ognize their individual responsibilities and take appro-
of field samples. Only final boring logs customarily are priate action. Some of these definitive clauses are likely
included in geotechnical engineering reports.These logs to appear in your geotechnical engineering report,and
should not under any circumstances be redrawn for inclusion in you are encouraged to read them dosely.Your geo-
architectural or other design drawings, because drafters technical engineer will be pleased to give full and frank
may commit errors or omissions in the transfer process. answers to your questions.
Although photographic reproduction eliminates this
problem, it does nothing to minimize the possibility of OTHER STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO
contractors misinterpreting the logs during bid prepara- I
tion. When this occurs,delays,disputes and unantici- REDUCE RISK
pated costs are the all-too-frequent result. Your consulting geotechnical engineer will be pleased to
To minimize the likelihood of boring log misinterpreta- discuss other techniques which can be employed to mit-
Lion,give contractors ready access to the complete geotechnical igate risk. In addition,ASFE has developed a variety of '
engineering report prepared or authorized for their use. materials which may be beneficial. Contact ASFE for a 1
Those who do not provide such access may proceed un- complimentary copy of its publications directory.
11
II
it
I '
11
1
Published by I
AsFeTHE ASSOCIATION i 1
OF ENGINEERING FIRMS
PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES
8811 Colesville Road/Suite G 106/Silver Spring, Maryland 20910/(301) 565-2733
0788/3M 11
II
1
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
OAKSDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST
RENTON, WASHINGTON
E-4563
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
The subject site is located in Renton and is bounded to the north by Oaksdale Avenue
Southwest near the intersection of Monster Road, to the east by an existing cardboard
manufacturing plant, and by Union Pacific railroad to the west and south (approximately as
indicated on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1). The site is low lying currently about six feet below
Oaksdale Avenue Southwest. The general area appears to have been leveled and partially
filled in the past.
The purpose of this study is to explore the existing subsurface conditions at the site and, on
this basis, to develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development.
At the time our study was performed, the site, proposed building locations, and our
exploratory locations were approximately as shown on the Boring and Test Pit Location Plan,
Plate 2.
We understand from our discussions with your architect, Mr. Bob Fadden, that you plan to
construct two warehouses, one of approximately two hundred and twenty thousand (220,000)
square feet in plan area, and the second approximately forty-eight thousand (48,000) square
feet in plan area. The structures are to be concrete tilt-up panel construction and will have
a dock-high floor. Although no specific design information is currently available, based on
our experience with similar construction, we have estimated the maximum total dead plus live
loads to be as follows:
• Wall loads - 3-1/2 kips per lineal foot
• Column loads - 150 kips
• Slab loads - 300 pounds per square foot (psf)
If any of the above design criteria change, we should be consulted to review the
recommendations contained in this report. In any case, we recommend that Earth
Consultants, Inc. (ECI) be retained to perform a general review of the final design.
Scope of Services
We performed this study in general accordance with the scope of services outlined in our July
19, 1989 proposal. On this basis, our report addresses:
-_ i
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 2
-- i
• Subsurface soil and groundwater conditions;
• Suitability of existing on-site materials for use as fill, or recommendations for
imported fill materials;
• Site preparation, grading and earthwork procedures, including details of fill
placement and compaction;
• Short-term and long-term groundwater management and erosion control
measures;
• Foundation bearing capacity and resistance of lateral loads for conventional
foundations;
• Estimates of potential total and differential settlement magnitudes and their
rates;
• Surcharge fill construction and monitoring program; and
• Parking area and access roadway design pavement sections.
This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only for the exclusive
use of Bruce Blume and Associates and their representatives. No other warranty, expressed
or implied, is made. We recommend that this report, in its entirety, be included in the
project contract documents for the information of the contractor.
SITE CONDITIONS
Surface
At the time of our field exploration, the site was covered by dense long field grass. The site
is essentially flat and is relatively low-lying, currently about six feet below the bordering road.
No structures are present on site, nor is there any evidence that any have been on the
property in the past. Wetland areas are apparently present in the central portion of the
property. These areas were relatively dry with no evidence of stagnant water, indicating that
the underlying material is providing good drainage towards the Green River. We understand
from our discussions that these areas will be kept in their natural state.
Subsurface
The site was explored by drilling three (3) borings and excavating sixteen (16) test pits at the
approximate locations shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the Boring logs Plates 4 through
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 3
6, and the Test Pit logs, Plates 7 through 15, for a more detailed description of the
-, conditions encountered at each location explored. A description of the field exploration
methods and laboratory testing program is included in the appendix of this report. The
following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered.
All of our exploratory borings and excavations in the building areas encountered a thin
surficial layer of loose silty sand topsoil. This layer, typically about six to eight inches thick,
contains a variety of small roots and rounded gravel. It is unsuitable for support of
foundations, floor slabs or pavements and cannot be used as a structural fill. Further, it
should not be mixed with materials that are to be used as a structural fill.
Underlying the surficial topsoil layer, we generally encountered a loose to medium dense
silty sand containing some gravel, which becomes silt in some localized areas. Beneath this
material we found interlayered soft to stiff silty clay and clayey silt, .and loose to dense silty
sand and sand. Typically, the density or consistency increased with depth. The clayey
materials are susceptible to compression under load.
We also excavated five Test Pits (TP-101 through 105) in the knoll located just to the
southeast of the southern building pad. The purpose was to determine the suitability of the in-place materials for use as a structural fill elsewhere on the site. Beneath an
approximately six inch thick surficial sod layer, we found medium dense to dense silty sand
extending to the depths explored. The lower materials appeared to be a weathered
sandstone. While these soils are suitable for support of a conventional warehouse-type
structure, they are not suitable for use as a structural fill. In our opinion, the soil contains
too large an amount of fines (silt and clay sized particles) and is highly susceptible to
degradation when wet.
Groundwater
The groundwater levels observed while drilling and excavating range from approximately ten
•to eleven feet below the existing surface and are shown on the boring and test pit logs. The
groundwater level is not considered static; thus, one may expect fluctuations in the level
depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors.
Generally, the water level is higher in the wetter winter months, typically October through
May.
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
Based on the results of our study, it is evident the site requires a substantial amount of fill
to raise the site to design subgrade elevation. Since there is no on-site fill source, the fill
must by necessity be imported from elsewhere. Placement of this fill, combined with the
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 4
proposed building loads, is estimated to cause a relatively large amount of settlement in the
soft compressible soils immediately underlying the site. Such settlement is likely to lead to
structural damage. To avoid this, we recommend you employ a surcharge fill to pre-induce
as much settlement as possible before construction begins.
While it would be most helpful to surcharge the pavement and parking areas of the site as
well as the building pads, this is not normally a standard, or practical, activity. We do,
however, strongly recommend the site fills be placed and compacted under strict engineering
control to verify they are competent. This will help reduce the settlement potential.
In our opinion, once the site fills are placed and a surcharge fill program has been
satisfactorily completed, the proposed buildings can be constructed generally as planned. We
recommend they be supported on conventional spread footings bearing on the compacted
structural fill. Post-construction settlement are expected to be relatively small and within this
form of structure's tolerable limits.
Current development plans call for the protection of an existing "wetland" area located in the
generally central part of the site. Since site fills will closely border this wetland area, you
must construct competent and stable fill slopes and protect the toes of the slopes from water
softening. This can be accomplished by appropriate vegetation or a protective surfacing
material.
Because of the relatively soft and compressible soils underlying most of the site, utility
installation may pose some minor construction difficulties. We recommend all utilities be
provided with flexible connections to allow for settlement related movements.
Although groundwater was not encountered at shallow depth, and considering the site grade
will be raised by about ten feet, we believe it prudent to include both short and long term
drainage control measures in design and construction. Such measures should include, but
need not be limited to, perimeter footing drains, downspout tightlines, site grading, shallow
• swales and earthen berms.
We explored a portion of..the knoll which is located just to the southeast of the site as a
potential fill source. Our exploration indicated the materials are very fine grained and
susceptible to severe disturbance when wet. As a result, we do not believe they are suitable
as a fill source. However, in the event you plan to construct an additional building in this
area, the soils should prove suitable for support of a tilt-up type structure, particularly if built
in the drier summer months. The in-place soils will likely require some. degree of
recompaction prior to such construction, and will need to be protected against the elements.
These, and other geotechnically related aspects of the project are discussed in more detail
in the following sections of this report.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 5
Site Preparation and General Earthwork
Stripping and Clearing: The building and parking areas should be stripped and cleared of
all existing vegetation, existing utilities, and any other deleterious material. We estimate that
on.the average, stripping depth of about six inches will be repaired. Stripped materials
should be removed from the site and disposed. They should not be mixed with materials to
be used as structural fill.
Subgrade Preparation: Following the stripping and excavation operations, structural fill can
be used to bring the building site to the desired subgrade. A typical detail for a structural
fill mat is provided on Plate 21. The soil surface where structural fill, foundations, or slabs
are to be placed should be proofrolled and compacted to a reasonably non-yielding condition.
Proofrolling helps to determine the presence and approximate areal extent of any soft or
unstable soils. If any soft or unstable areas are encountered, they should be moisture-
conditioned as appropriate then recompacted. If after recompaction they remain soft or
unstable, they should be overexcavated to a depth that will provide a stable base. Typical-
ly, a depth of two to three feet is adequate for this purpose. The overexcavated unsuitable
material should be removed, disposed and replaced with structural fill. These operations
should be performed under the continuous observation of ECI's representative.
Structural Fill: Structural fill is defined as any fill placed around or beneath buildings, floor
slabs, pavements, walkways, or any other load-bearing areas. Ideally, but particularly for wet
weather construction, structural fill should comprise an organic-free, granular, free-draining
material with a maximum particle size of three inches. It should contain less than 5 percent
fines (silt and clay-sized particles passing the number 200 mesh sieve). During dry weather,
any organic-free, compactible material meeting the above maximum size criterion may be
used.
Structural fill under footings, floor slabs, and pavements should be placed in thin horizontal
lifts. Lifts should not exceed eight inches in loose thickness for heavy compactors, and four
.inches for hand-held compactors. Each lift should be compacted to at least 95 percent of
maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Method D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor).
- I
Fill under walkways should be placed in similar thin horizontal lifts and, with the exception
of the upper twelve (12) inches, be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum density.
The top twelve (12) inches should be compacted to at least 95 percent maximum density.
Any fill or native soils disturbed during construction should either be recompacted or
overexcavated and replaced with compacted structural fill or crushed rock. To facilitate the
compaction process, we recommend that all fills, including the on-site soils if used, be placed
at or near their optimum moisture content. If fill soils are on the wet side of optimum they
are likely to be difficult to compact. In this case they should then be replaced with a free-
draining granular import fill, or should be dried until they can be adequately compacted.
Drying can be achieved by aeration or by intermixing lime or cement powder to absorb.
excess moisture.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 6
As part of our site exploration, we dug four test pits in the lower slopes of a knoll located
just to the southeast of the site. These pits were dug in an effort to determine the suitability
of the in-place soils as a structural fill material on the lower lying site. Based on the
conditions exposed, we do not believe the material on the knoll are suitable for use as a
structural fill. They contain a significant amount of fines (silt and clay sized particles) and
are highly susceptible to deterioration when wet. Excavation, movement and replacement
and compaction are likely to be difficult, if not impossible. Thus, it is virtually certain that
you will need to import materials form an outside source.
When you have retained an earthwork contractor, and he has selected a pit from which he
intends to import fill materials, you should retain us to visit and examine the pit, to acquire
representative fill source samples and to perform the appropriate laboratory testing to
determine the materials suitability. Providing this is done early enough in the scheme of
construction, it will be possible to modify fill or compaction recommendations or even to
change fill the source, if necessary, before you are committed to performing the earthwork.
You should provide a contingency in your budget and schedule to accommodate this critical
service.
Foundations
Based on the encountered site conditions and the preliminary building design criteria, we
believe that conventional footings supported on compacted structural fill can be used,
provided that a surcharge program to induce settlement is successfully performed. The
surcharge program is discussed in more detail in a subsequent paragraph.
Once the preload program is successfully completed, the conventional footings can be
designed on the basis of the following criteria:
• Allowable bearing pressure, including all = 2,500 psf
dead and live loads.
• Minimum depth of perimeter footing; below = 18 inches
adjacent final exterior grade.
• Minimum depth of interior footings; below = 12 inches
top of floor slab.
• Minimum width of wall footings = 18 inches
• Minimum lateral dimension of column = 24 inches
footings
• Estimated total post-construction = 1 inch, or less
settlement
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 7
• Estimated post-construction differential = 1/2 inch, or less
settlement; across building width
A one-third increase in the above allowable bearing pressures can be used when considering
short-term transitory wind or seismic loads.
Lateral loads can also be resisted by friction between the foundation and the supporting
compacted fill subgrade or by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the
foundations. For the latter, the foundations must he poured "neat".against the existing soil
or backfilled with a compacted fill meeting the requirements of structural fill. We
recommend the following parameters be used in design:
• Passive pressure = 300 pcf equivalent fluid weight
• Coefficient of friction = 0.35
As mentioned earlier, we also explored the lower portion of the knoll located just to the
southeast of the site. While the materials are not suitable for use as a structural fill in wet
weather, the area is capable of supporting construction of similar nature. In our opinion, a
"typical" concrete tilt-up building can be constructed on this area provided care is exercised
during design and construction. Such a building could be supported on conventional spread
footings bearing on the carefully recompacted and densified in-place soils. The design
parameters outlined above should prove applicable. However, we recommend you retain us
to evaluate any design plan before proceeding to allow us to verify that the conditions can
support the proposed construction.
Dock-High Retaining Walls
We understand that dock-high retaining walls may be constructed along portions of the
perimeter of the buildings. We recommend they be designed to resist lateral load. imposed
by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of forty (40) pcf if they are allowed to rotate 0.002
times the height of the wall. If the walls are prevented from rotating, we recommend that
they be designed to resist lateral loads of sixty (60) pcf equivalent fluid weight. These values
assume that no vehicular, floor or other surcharge loads will act on the wall. If such loads
are to apply, they should be added to the above design lateral pressures.
We assume that the walls will be backfilled with a suitable free-draining material. Typically,
wall backfill should consist of materials similar to structural fill. Wall backfill should have
a maximum size of three inches, be organic-free, and have a maximum of three percent fines
(materials passing the No. 200 mesh sieve). Twenty-five (25) to seventy (70) percent of the
particles should pass the No. 4 mesh sieve. A typical wall backfill detail is provided as
Plate 19.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
I �
Eland Distribution Facility
3
September 27, 1989
Page 8
Page 8
As an alternative to free-draining wall backfill, you may wish to consider the use of a
geotextile drainage product such as "Miradrain". In either case, we recommend the
installation of a drain line along the base of each wall. These drains are discussed in more
detail in the Site Drainage section of this report.
Slab-on-Grade Floors
Slab-on-grade floors can be used with conventional foundations provided that the preload
program is satisfactorily completed. The slab should be supported on compacted structural
fill. Any fill or native soils disturbed by construction activity should either be recompacted
or excavated and replaced with compacted structural fill or crushed rock.
To allow for moisture build-up on the subgrade, the slab should be provided with
break consisting of a minimum of four inches a capillary
of free_draining sand or gravel. We also
recommend that a vapor barrier, such as a 6-mil plastic membrane, be placed over the
capillary break beneath the slab to reduce both water vapor transmission through the slab
and the resultant moisture related damage to interior furnishings.
Two inches of damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during
construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. It will also help prevent cement paste
bleeding down into the underlying capillary break through joints or tears in the vapor barrier.
An alternative means of slab support, if recompaction efforts are thwarted by poor weather,
is the use of a cement-bound granular fill pad. This would incorporate intermixing between
about four and seven percent portland cement powder, by weight, into the upper twelve
inches of the dock high site fill. The cement-bound fill is then appropriately moisture-
, conditioned and compacted. This will provide an approximately one foot thick layer of
essentially weak concrete on which to build the slab. It is not unusual to achieve twenty-
eight (28) day compressive strengths in excess of twelve hundred (1200) pounds per square
inch with this form of construction. Typically, the cement bound fill will provide an
allowable soil bearing in excess of three thousand (3,000) psf. If you wish to pursue this
option further, we will be available to provide more specific design parameters.
Settlements
Based on the nature of the materials underlying the site, the need to a substantial
lace
amount of structural fill to achieve design site grade, and p proposedbstmtia
lf
construction, the buildings are likely to undergo a relatively largeamount of settlement.r This
settlement is of sufficient magnitude to cause structural damage.
The surcharge program should be designed to pre-consolidate the compressible soils found
in the upper eleven (11) feet of the site, such that the surcharge would apply loads greater
than those possible under normal fill and building loads. Resulting settlements from the
surcharge program should be about the same magnitude as the estimated settlements. A
Earth Consultants, Inc.
' Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 9
smaller settlement than estimated could be interpreted that the clayey silt have been pre-
- consolidated and soil conditions are better than anticipated. Conversely, a larger settlement
than that estimated could be interpreted that the soil conditions are worse than anticipated,
and additional measures should be taken to obtain satisfactory results.
Surcharge Program
We estimate the settlement under the combined building and fill load to be on the order of
six (6) to seven (7) inches. Differential settlement could be about half this magnitude across
the building width. To avoid this, we recommend you perform a preload surcharge program
to pre-induce as much settlement as possible before construction begins.
Current plans call for up to about ten feet of fill, generating a load on the order of twelve
hundred (1,200) psf on the original site subgrade. This fill load will cause a certain degree
of settlement to occur before any building is constructed. In addition, there will be the
proposed floor slab load, presently estimated at about three hundred (300) psf. Although
settlements under this load are substantially smaller than those generated by the fill, they are
still of sufficient magnitude to cause slab damage. The damage is typically in the form of
slab cracking, warping or separation. To prevent settlement under the slab load, the
surcharge fill should be of a weight that is at least equal to, but preferably greater than, the
slab load. In this case, a minimum surcharge thickness of two and one-half feet will
approximately equal the maximum proposed floor load. To further decrease the potential
for post-surcharge and construction settlement, an additional six inches to one foot of
surcharge can be added.
One means of reducing the cost of a surcharge program is to use a "rolling surcharge". This
can be achieved on two separate ways. Either the surcharge fill material is to be used as
a structural fill elsewhere on the site after the surcharge program is completed, or the
surcharge fill can be used first on one building pad, then on the next. This approach
requires less surcharge material than that required to settle both building pads at the same
time.
Surcharge material should conform to the requirements of structural fill, described earlier in
this text, if the material is to be used as a fill elsewhere on the site. Regardless, the fill
should have a minimum unit weight of one hundred and twenty (120) pcf. The surcharge
should extend for a distance of at least ten (10) feet beyond the building perimeter. From
this point, the surcharge fill should be sloped at an inclination of 1H:1V, or flatter, down to
the site grade.
Based on the conditions observed in the field, and the results of our selective laboratory tests
and our engineering analyses, we estimate the settlement
s is induced by the combined site and
surcharge fills will take between about ten (10) and twelve (12) weeks to complete.
However, the only reasonable accurate means of verifying the time rate is to perform a
surcharge monitoring program. This program will include setting settlement monitoring
markers on the existing site subgrade before any fill is placed, then monitoring them through
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 10
completion of fill placement, then on until settlements cease or are considered within the
building's tolerable limits. More specific details of this program are presented below:
• Settlement markers should be placed on the native subgrade of each building pad
before any fill is placed. We recommend six markers within the larger building
footprint and four in the .smaller. ECI can supply and install these markers. (A
typical detail is provided on Plate 20.)
• A baseline reading is obtained on each marker and is referenced to a temporary
benchmark located on a feature that will be unaffected by the fill-induced
settlements.
• The structural and surcharge fills are thenplaced. Settlement
g e t readings are taken at
relatively short intervals during this process, since this phase generates a relatively
large amount of rapid settlement.
• Once the fill operation is completed, readings are obtained on a periodic basis,
typically on a weekly to bi-weekly basis, until the settlement ceases or is judged by
the geotechnical engineer to be within the structure's tolerable limits.
• Each set of settlement readings are plotted graphically against time to determine
the magnitude and rate of activity, and are matched against the predicted magnitudes
and rates. This allows us to verify the accuracy of earlier estimates and to make any
appropriate modifications.
We recommend ECI be retained to acquire the settlement readings. If you prefer to use
another entity to collect these readings, we recommend you provide the data to us as quickly
after their acquisition as possible for plotting and interpretation. This will help avoid any
misinterpretation or misunderstanding about the success of the surcharge program.
You should also understand that completion of primary settlements under the surcharge
program does not complete total settlement. The clayey soils underlying this site are also
likely to undergo long-term secondary settlement. This form of settlement continues 'over
a much longer period, perhaps several years. This form of settlement occurs as air and
water is slowly squeezed out of the soil by the fill and building load. The greater the weight
of the surcharge fill, the less impact this is likely to have on the structure. Secondary
settlements can be as much as about fifty percent of the primary settlement. Your structural
engineer must consider this in his design.
One last concern in the settlement monitoring program concerns the maintenance of
settlement markers. Given that there will be a significant earthwork operation on this site
to construct the site and surcharge fills, there will be a lot of earthwork traffic. This traffic
can be a significant threat to the integrity of the settlement markers. In our experience,
earthwork equipment (dozers and trucks) often demolish markers at a very high rate. This
adds to the project costs in that they need to be replaced and makes the information
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 11
obtained less reliable. To avoid this scenario, we recommend your project specifications
include a requirement that the earthwork contractor is required to immediately replace any
damaged settlement marker and have the settlement readings re-obtained at his own cost!
This has, in the past, helped maintain the integrity of the monitoring program and has made
the earthwork contractor more conscious of the client's needs.
Excavations and Slopes
While no major excavations or slope construction efforts are anticipated in construction, you
should be aware that in no case should excavation slopes, including utility trenches, be
greater than the limits specified in local, state and federal safety regulations. Temporary cuts
greater than four feet in depth should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1H:1V.
If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, or if excavations greater than
four feet in depth are required, temporary shoring may be necessary. This shoring will help
protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workmen in the
excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide geotechnical
shoring design criteria, if requested.
Since it is apparent that fill slopes will be constructed and extend out to the edges of the
wetlands, we recommend the toes of these slopes be protected. A vegetative cover, or
placement of a graded rock filter material, should be sufficient for this purpose.
All temporary slopes should be protected against the elements. Installation of a shallow
swale or low earthen berm along the crest of each slope should be adequate to collect and
redirect water to a positive and permenant discharge. The slope face should be covered
with a pegged or sandbagged in-place impervious sheeting.
Over the long term, the slopes should be seeded as quickly after construction as possible
with a suitable rapid growth and deep rooted vegetation. Your landscape architect can
provide a suitable seed mix. The seed should be maintained in-place with a sprayed mulch,
with the possible addition of a pegged in-place jute matting or geotechnical fabric. This will
help keep the seed and mulch on the slope surface until the root mat has an opportunity to
germinate and take hold.
Rockeries
• If you elect to use a rockery to protect the perimeter of the site, you should understand that
a rockery is not a retaining wall in the sense one would consider a' reinforced concrete
retaining wall. A rockery is primarily to protect the exposed soil surface against erosion and
weather damage. However, if a rockery is properly constructed, by virtue of its mass it will
provide some degree of retention. The larger the rocks used, the more mass and, therefore,
the greater the retaining ability.
Rockery construction is, to a large extent, an art not entirely controllable by engineering
methods. Because of this, it is imperative that your rockeries be constructed by an
II
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 12
ri n exile e ced contractor with the equipment and capability to construct rockeries of a similar
nature to those you require built. To help you in this ,respect, we have provided a current
copy of the Associated Rockery Contractors (ARC) Standard Rockery Construction
Guidelines as Appendix C. We recommend that your contractor closely adhere to the
recommendations contained in that document. In the event that a rockery exceeds the
maximum height acceptable to the City or County, or if the rockery is to be constructed
against a new fill, we will be available to provide the necessary engineering and monitoring
services.
Site Drainage
We do not expect the site groundwater levels will present any major construction-related
problems. However, the site should be graded such that surface water is directed off the
building site. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs or
pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be roller-sealed
at night to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades
should allow for drainage away from the building foundations. We suggest that the ground
be sloped at a gradient of 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the
buildings except in areas that are to be paved.
If seepage is encountered in foundation excavations during construction, we recommend that
you slope the bottom of the excavation to one or more shallow sump pits. The collected
water can then be pumped from these pits to a positive and permanent discharge, such as
a nearby storm drain.
Although the groundwater level was recorded several feet below the existing site grade, and
considering the site grade in the building pad areas will be raised several feet, we still firmly
believe drainage control measures installed at the time of construction are the most
economical insurance against long term water or seepage related problems. Because of this,
we recommend you install footing drains around the building perimeter. These drains should
consist of a four-inch minimum diameter, perforated or slotted, rigid drain pipe laid at, or
just below, the invert of the footing with a gradient sufficient to initiate flow. The drain line
should be bedded on, surrounded by, and covered with a free-draining washed rock or other
free-draining granular material.
Once the drains are installed, with the exception of the upper twelve (12) inches, the
excavation can be backfilled with a granular fill material. The surficial twelve (12) inches
of fill should consist of compacted and relatively impermeable soil. It can be separated from
the underlying more granular drainage material by a layer of building paper or visqueen.
The surface should be sloped to drain away from the building wall. Alternatively, the surface
can be sealed with asphalt or concrete paving. A typical detail is provided on Plate 22.
Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain
system. All roof downspouts must be separately tightlined to discharge. We recommend you
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 13
install sufficient cleanouts at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the
footing drain and downspout tightline systems.
We recommend the appropriate locations of subsurface drains, if needed, be established
during grading operations by ECI's representative, at which time the seepage areas, if
present, may be more clearly defined.
Based on the general grain size, we have estimated a coefficient of permeability (K) for the
materials overlying the relatively impermeable clayey soils. The K value is likely to be on
the order of 2.4x10-2 inches per hour. For the underlying clayey materials, we estimate the
K value to be more on the order of 1.2x10"3 inches per hour.
Utility Support
Utility lines installed in fills or native soils should use either APWA Specifications 61-2.02
and 61-2.03, or the specific manufacturers' recommendations, for both rigid and flexible pipe
bedding. Utility trench backfill is a major concern in preventing settlement activity along
utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility
line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped
to make sure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed
and hand tamped to about twelve (12) inches above the crown of the pipe before any heavy
compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be
placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve (12) inches. Trench fill, where
not supporting a structure, should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry
density, as determined by ASTM Test Method D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). The upper
twelve (12) inches should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum density.
If utility trench excavations encounter soft and easily compressible soils at invert elevations
that cannot be remedied by placement of the bedding material, it may be necessary to
perform some overexcavation and replacement of unsuitable materials. Typically, an
.overexcavation depth of about two feet is sufficient to provide a "bridge" across soft and
compressible soils. The overexcavation backfill should be crushed rock or clean compact
structural fill. In addition, to help accommodate any post-construction settlement, we
recommend all underground utility lines include flexible joints.
The trench width in soft soils should be at least three pipe diameters. This will allow for
placement of sufficient bedding and/or fill material to laterally support the pipe. Depending
on the actual nature of the in-place soils, it might also be prudent to wrap the bedding
material in a geotechnical fabric. This determination should be made at the time of
construction. However, you should include a contingency in your budget and schedule to
accommodate this possibility.
We also recommend you consult us once the final utility layout has been determined to .
reevaluate the above recommendations. At that time it might prove possible to more
accurately determine the specific nature of utility trench treatment.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 14
Pavement Areas
The adequacy of site pavements is strictly related to the condition of the underlying
subgrade. If this is inadequate, no matter what pavement section is constructed, settlement
or movement of the subgrade will be reflected up through the paving. In order to avoid
this situation, we recommend the subgrade be treated and prepared as described in the Site
Preparation section of this report. This means at least the top twelve (12) inches of the
subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum thy density (per ASTM D-
1557-78). It is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade may still
exist after this process. If so, the unsuitable materials may require overexcavation and
replacement with a compacted structural fill or a crushed rock. Depending on the nature
of the prepared subgrade at the time of construction, it may also be necessary to use a
geotextile fabric to separate pavement materials from the underlying subgrade and to help
strengthen the pavement section. A Mirafi 500X, or approved equivalent, should be suitable
for this purpose.
As mentioned earlier, because of the amounts of fill to be placed over this site and the
settlement susceptibility of the underlying native soils, long-term settlements in both building
and pavement areas should be expected. The building area settlements can be controlled
to some degree by the use of a surcharge fill program. While it is not normally an
economically feasible step to surcharge the parking and roadway areas, we recommend you
give this some consideration. The greater the loads applied to the pavement area fill before
construction, the lower the risk of settlement damage to the pavements over time. This
option might be achievable if a rolling.surcharge program is used.
On the assumption that it will not be economically feasible to surcharge the pavement areas,
we urge you to make sure that the fill in these areas is placed and compacted under our
full-time observation and of suitable material. On this basis, we have provided you with two
alternative pavement sections for the lightly trafficked access and parking areas, and for the
.more heavily trafficked truck access and loading areas. In the more lightly-loaded areas we
recommend the following:
• Two inches of Asphalt Concrete (AC) over four inches of Crushed Rock Base
(CRB) material, or
• Two inches of AC over three inches of Asphalt Treated Base (ATB) material.
For the heavier truck-traffic areas, we have made some assumptions about site usage,
pavement life and site traffic. We assumed the pavement life to be ten (10) years, that
truck traffic would be essentially confined to one lane in each direction, and that traffic
could double within the pavement life. We estimate the pavement subgrade would have an
equivalent "R-Value" of about sixty (60). On the basis of these estimated criteria, we used
•
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 15
the State of Washington Flexible Pavement Design Method to determine a suitable pavement
design section. As a result of this analysis, we recommend the following:
• Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB, or
• Three inches of AC over four and one-half inches of ATB.
If the above design assumptions appear incorrect to you, or if you have more detailed and
accurate traffic criteria, please provide the information to us so that we can re-analyze these
heavier pavement sections. If we are not provided further data, we will assume these data
in our analysis to be correct.
Because of the general nature of the site soils and the time of construction, we recommend
you select the ATB pavement section. This will not only provide you with a competent
"blacktop" surface that will help protect the site from construction activity, but will also
provide a clean, dry and competent surface on which to store and protect construction
materials. It has also been our experience that in spite of its slightly higher initial cost, this
form of surfacing requires considerably less maintenance either during or after a winter
construction period.
LIMITATIONS
Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective
laboratory testing, engineering analyses, the design information provided us, and our
experience and engineering judgement. The conclusions and recommendations are
professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill
ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar
conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied.
.The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the
borings and test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between borings and test pits may
vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory
locations may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear, ECI should
be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them
in writing prior to proceeding with the construction.
Additional Services
We recommend that ECI be retained to perform a general review of the final design and
specifications. This will allow us to verify that the earthwork and foundation
recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design plans and
in the construction specifications.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 16
We also recommend that ECI be retained to provide geotechnical services during
construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or
recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from
those anticipated prior to the start of construction. Because of the settlement-sensitive
nature of this project we do not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundations
or earthwork unless we are retained to provide these services.
it
Earth Consultants, Inc.
f
- f
f
— 1
a
� � l
I eT x
APPENDIX A
E-4563
FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
Our field exploration was performed on August 15, August 22, and September 13, 1989.
Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling three (3) borings to a maximum
depth of thirty nine (39) feet below the existing grade and excavating seventeen (17) test
pits to a maximum depth of eleven (11) feet below existing grade. The borings were drilled
using a truck-mounted Acker drill rig. Continuous flight, hollow stem augers were used to
advance and support the boreholes during sampling.
Approximate boring and test pit locations were determined by taping from property corners.
The boring and test pit elevations were determined by interpolating between contour lines
shown on a Topographic and Wetlands Survey by Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. for job
#89219, dated 6/19/89. The locations and elevations of the borings and test pits should be
considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate
locations are shown on the Boring and Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2.
The field exploration was continuously monitored by a geotechnical engineer from our firm
who classified the soils encountered and maintained a log of each boring and test pit,
obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site
features. All samples were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil
Classification System which is presented on Plate 3, Legend. Logs of the borings are
presented on Plates 4 through 6; and the Test Pit Logs are presented on Plates 7 through
15. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the
laboratory examination and selective tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the
logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions
may be more gradual.
In each boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed at selected intervals in
general accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1586. The split spoon samples were
. driven with a one hundred forty (140) pound hammer freely falling thirty (30) inches. The
number of blows required to drive the last twelve (12) inches of penetration are called the
"N-value". This value helps to characterize the site soils and is used in our engineering
analyses.
The density or consistency of the soil exposed in the test pits was estimated based on the
effort required to excavate the soil, the stability of the trench walls, and other factors.
Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory
for further examination and testing.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
•
•
\ il-m-E--=1- rvury rNi iv J I ) LASTWOOD v/ LP ''' y - T'L. z
�' ill ' ' � �FOUNTAIN ST �N o' . x...::,:':. :•. � v a � O-
ai!2l" ST' uT S a LEO I $T — .Sato :71••.. •• Qv P. v S
�� ` � s m '112TH ST \1 „5 r _I Q,° S o 113ni
\ S a �/1•\H; S I > N r Q L �� J W, S 114TH r. ST Q •
•
\\ J sr S AVDN a ST I a� o —<
�� � A 014; • e lLr I x • N N II J O 0: • S IISTHcn ST
r x� N. Sr • s v,F' '-e.. I 2T.AUDUSTA 6 i > ` a 3 (j s 11s1� P�'
�s \\ rq q < >0 Sr- 115TH ST >. o
u> \a >s-SA ST >MS''', i ' N ST :�5116TN ST •--�-- -r� S Q
TM 99 1S < qST J Q Q; S • 117TH $T 19�S SI�STHST �=y> a S S I '
S IIB ST _ ¢ 14 I 2 '6TH. et Pza '' (�6t, -_-
11 S-'& NS-1-- qy-� --- { * j ;i; ;
- '1_ — � 1 I- —v'<• lu" S. I 260`'."P}TI �car .5 1• NIR La
r( SKY�A1!:::P/;5:,M12y :: SKY "� Y
a a S 124 ST © I S u' I S 124TH w f Y c;,:7p-�h' S a •
• .:: 8 125TH 5T 'rr A Q`' .::y`;'K n
'rJ U Q S 125TH ST 1'1'4::.'i�. h 0I>- >
- 13f CEM.FS m a
ti I �. N ST 6F I I::.�SH.. S ` LIB s
•....r•• ;Pb.i:.7 .....,•: ' S�r2STH IA > 'PO 1 qe 5. H ,pose; T
i',_.:.r.. • I ST Q V ON I 61 -T "•.•
EARLINGTON '.•• %`u.;. i.j^ 1- S • < N I i' in \?- ., ' —— in°— _ 4
//-For a�' :n:r- • S—12— -2 2P S 1 PL T (O —.n •0-1".
F ....s.:` r!", ''`is • 91. PL na '1 S 128TH 1'
S�, w?'yi;;f:•': 1.E :..n ..;;'1�'' \ 4. :0 x S¢ 129TH>ST
>
is :^
L'-'� ^:;,:` ..4;L;: _C'fi�`' ,}.: .' ..• h. $T � 4 I '>Si29TH" PL a Sa 129TH ST <
:1-:.:74e i glil.' ., S 130TH ST x S '
i1 ,1,- ••B _- S1i r- S P
• Fy'..,•s:y _:rl f 1. L,:;:' F s I . x x o
%� 0. 1'".i 41' 9(' ITIST xST S ., LANGSTON PT RD lD '1`•-•
Sum ! lyn l#;•.7 SP,' rAwDRA C'O S O ST S 1715T CT
.m ,9r N.. . ;, ., 1MND ST S I 133RD SST S •
'i l i''. 4.e: r 4 •1;:F.:4" 139 rH 397E
I15SH TH�'1�1 . , : :;';TIC;. i : 'osier '''~=-�_:,:, s
s 135T ::. , lyr
;T•i > i :. :% 4:.:
_IMEM x 1 ;H G.. ji:.: a� "`.\ _ 4. ��S 113TH ST o°
4 DI N3 sasru 1 a 0 xi- 4 9iy-, :.`r :,..• CD y :�
-, .,1: •s
�,� >Iyl � sq`9L' '";� ro4tr'Se''1. s IBCt�I>;ST, �. ''-N I 0
o NaN>I'm .'.9P 1 T S 1�5� .„.4"Eli:s•tl t\G RIVER.•''• :=DT^' EARL
142ND Y �S ¢I [y2/8 r't•^ `..\ "i /
!�/ I ✓R. I 5 5 ;s .N L
..'N SN• � s,.... DST \,. ,__'.,�p`�•� �'• M Q" ST '.''i�`��PtF.: \\ S 143R1 EARLIAOi1Wi'..,
c. N n d r 144 HST r. GOLF'COURSE I )1_
—I S 1461 H ST ,n a _' !-_:`, I M DEN t
co r. :PARK::: . 1,
•
._--_. A '>.� S 147TH Sr B,�— N ••>•....i!' : ?\ iT.,, 11
4D. .
RJ
Reference: ,
King County / Map 34
•
By Thomas Brothers Maps
Dated 1988
//I '*. Vicinity Map
•' Earth Consultants Inc.i' ����, •. - Eland Distribution Facility
ceoTe hnlcal Engineers.Geologists 14 Environmental sdT-nIL is •
King County,Washington
Proj. No. 4563 : Drwn. GLS Date Sept '89 ':. Checked ND Date 9:'22/89 Plate I
1
L.. I _- I
__ I __ TEST PITS /0/-/05 LOCATED
__ EAST OF STUDY AREA. SEE
- TEST PIT LOGS FOR FURTHER
IT Mit
�-5 DATA. •
•
4111R1
N 1P-6-__-_--(-_,i.N.___..__, \ Bldg. B 16
W TP-4 S ® B-1 10 -N2 14
r:±_=
Z \. 1P-11\
A= s°°leM
W \ O 50 100 200ff.
(
..______ \
Mi j \
Q ZP-12
L J \ WETLANDS
J \
•
<C LEGEND
TP-3 \ •
Y Bldg. A J� �� 16 S B-I Approximate Location of
Q '—� 10 �_• ECI Boring, Prvj. No.
;. O J E-4563 , Sept. 1989
14 12
mi 1 P-I Approximate Location of
16 1P-7 ECI Test Pit, Proj. No.
�-l� ® WETLANDS l `_ E-4563 , Sept. 1989
)_.i lP-2 ® B-2 /./.\/.
®TP-101 Approximate LoaTion of
� � ( ECI Test Pit, Proj. No.
�. L
f.,__/ E 4563, Sept. 1989
Proposed Building
i I Existing Building
-g I I
Vp-I
___l ® B-3
Reference
Job No. 89246.01
- - - - - - - -- -- - - Schematic Grading a Utility Plan
By
1... C.:•-,,,,,--____,,,,, ........... i • Doted ush 8/24 69 Hitchings; Inc.
•
_---.. iA 'p 411\ Boring and Test Pit Location Plan
�• Earth Consultants Inc.
Eland County;
Facility
`t 1//J G•otrrhnkal h]rglneters.Geologists&hlrvirau tal Scientists King Washington
•
Proj No. 4563 Drwn. GLS Date Sept. '89 Checked ND Date 9/22/89 Plate 2
1 •
MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION
SYMBOL SYMBOL
° ° ,.m.e o
•°°• •4 •"°• •o GW Well-Graded Gravels,Gravel-Sand
Gravel • •o so.e. oo
And Clean Gravels .... 09...
' 'O •°•'.'O _°...0. •o gW Mixtures, Little Or No Fines
Gravelly (little or no fines) : :.: :0: :.: : r.zp Poorly-Graded Gravels,Gravel-
Coarse Soils ► • •- • •- • gp Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Fines
Grained
Soils More Than 111 i�. li!!� GM gm Silt Silty GravelsMixtures,Gravel Sand-
50% Coarse Gravels With *III
Fraction Fines(appreciable ,�
Retained On amount of fines) /1' GC Clayey Gravels, Gravel-Sand-
No.4 Sieve r
gC Clay Mixtures
Sand o °o ° o° ° SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly
And Clean Sand o°°o ; pO °° SW Sands, Little Or No Fines
Sandy (little or no fines) -.;......... ...
More Than Soils ; SP Poorly-Graded Sands, Gravelly
50% Material : :7: Sp Sands, Little Or No Fines
Larger Than %'� �'��!
No.200 Sieve More Than
•
Size 50/ Coarse Sands With •• SM SM Silty Sands, Sand-Silt Mixtures
Fraction Fines(appreciable
Passing No.4 amount of fines) //Pell SC
Sieve SC Clayey Sands, Sand-Clay Mixtures
ML Inorganic Silts&Very Fine Sands,Rock FlourSilty-
ml Clayey Fine Sands;Clayey Silts w/Slight Plasticity
Fine Silts
Grained And Liquidess Than Limit CL Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity,
Soils Clays L 50 CI Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean
I III I II I I OL Organic Silts And Organic
I I I 01 Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity
•
More Than MH Inorganic Silts, Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fine
mh Sand Or Silty Soils
50% Material Silts Liquid Limit
Smaller Than And • CH Inorganic Clays Of High
No.200 Sieve Clays Greater Than 50 Ch Plasticity, Fat Clays.
Size
�//////^ OH Organic Clays Of Medium To Hig •
h
//////�/' oil Plasticity, Organic Silts
(///////�
Highly Organic Soils - ,
�.. =f PT Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils
,y_.,. •_ pt With High Organic Contents
Topsoil Humus And Duff Layer
Fill Highly Variable Constituents
The Discussion In The Text Of This Report Is Necessary For A Proper Understanding '
' Of The Nature Of The Material Presented In The Attached .Logs
' Notes':
. Dual symbols are used to indicate borderline soil classification.Upper
case letter symbols designate sample classifications based upon lab-
oratory testing; lower case letter symbols designate classifications not
verified by laboratory testing.
I 2-0.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER C TORVANE READING, tsf
IL SHELBY RING TUBE SAMPLER OR qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf
P SAMPLER PUSHED W MOISTURE, percent of dry weight
SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED pcf DRY DENSITY,pounds per cubic ft.
1 Q WATER LEVEL (DATE) LL LIQUID LIMIT,percent
aWATER OBSERVATION WELL PI PLASTIC INDEX
Earth LEGEND
Consultants Inc.
• -. Geotechnical Engineering and Geology IProj. No. 4563 1 Date Sept'89 Plate 3
BORING NO. 1
Logged By ND
Date 8-22-89 Elev. 11±*
(N)
(Graph CS Soil Description Depth Sample Blows (oW)
Ft.
I1:3:I:if:: :f:l Gray silty SAND with gravel, moist,
ii :: medium dense
:: ::< sm Gray SILT and fine sand, moist, loose -
': : >::.: - 7 28.3
cl-ml Gray-bluish silty CLAY, moist, -
medium stiff 5 45:7
- I
_ to
::;••,;1• sm Dark gray-black silty SAND, wet,
:::;<.a dense 20 • 31
-
..L
•>• 15
-
:..• •...�:` •
-
25 29.9
..
:ti:1:.ti:::L ::
: ••r•:•
- 20 •
•:...,••,--::. 23 3 3
,.
•. •J..
: - 25
-becomes sandy and dense
:: ': - 28 24.7
.
•' .:i '' sm Dark gray-black silty SAND and sand - I 12 29.7
with shells, wet medium dense -
*Elevation interpolated between contour — 35
''••`' ':::% lines of Bush, Roed & Hitchings -
::„. ::` Schematic Grading and Utility Plan, job •
#89246.01, dated 8-24-89
14 33.7
Boring terminated at 39 feet below existing grade. •
i Groundwater encountered at 12 feet during drilling.
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of.
information presented on this log.
��!" r ����� BORING LOG
1 oI Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
i - ' `, C r�xc chnical Engineers.t rs,Geologists sts&Environmental Scientists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 45631 Drwn. GLS I Sept'89 Checked ND 1
Date 9-21-89 f Plate 4
BORING NO. 2
Logged By ND
Date 8-22-89 Elev. 12±
(N)
Graph �S Soil Description D(ft)h Sample Blows (%)
•
Ft.
sm Gray-light brown silty SAND with gravel,
!? I moist, medium dense
Gray silty CLAY, moist, stiff 12 1.3
5
/'ci_m Gray silty CLAY, moist, soft 4 8.5
-traces of peat 10
A.
/ 4
sm Dark gray-black silty SAND and sand,
wet, loose 11 1.4
•
•
15
•
• Z 7 43. 4.
20
��� cl Gray CLAY, wet, firm - stiff
Dark gray-black silty SAND, wet, 23 c1.5
dense
—25
sm Dark gray-black silty SAND and sand 27 25
with shells wet medium dense
Boring terminated at 29 feet below existing grade.
Groundwater encountered at 11 feet during drilling.
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
• judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
•
"it .f�� BORING LOG
Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
,''I Gentechnfa l Engineers.Geologists&Environmental.Scientists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 Drwn. GLS Sept'89 Checked ND Date 9-21-89 Plate 5
BORING NO. 3
' Logged By ND
Date 8-22-89 Elev. 15±
•(N)
Graph CS Soil Description Depth
h Sample Blows (%V)
Ft.
>ii:..;: y. sm Gray-light brown silty SAND, moist, -
i.
:::ii . `` loose - medium dense, with some roots _ I 7 14
- 5
ml Gray-light brown fine SAND and silt, _ -T 5 31.1
moist, loose
_ 10
SZ
ml Gray and brown SILT and fine sand, wet, _ 8 35.E
.medium stiff
— 15
f:i.L• ��
•
`...J' ' sm Dark gray-black silty SAND and sand,
L:: 6 31,8
; wet, loose
-
••:!::': - 20
-
1-cl Gray SILT/CLAY, wet, soft to medium
stiff
:c ::' : ' sm Dark gray-black silty SAND, wet,
......J .
-'••L'l-�• dense _ 25
:'::::;:
:•..•:•. r
4: •, ' 2 9 24.
2
Boring terminated at 30 feet below existing grade.
Groundwater encountered at 11.5 feet during drilling.
•
•
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
• judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
���� BORING LOG
01-4 Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
Ili ,i Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS I Sept'89 Checked ND I Date 9-21-89 ' Plate
6
•
TEST PIT NO. 1
Logged By ND
Date 8-15-89 Bev. 15.5±
Depth W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
I 0
sm-ml Gray silty SAND and silt, moist, medium dense
•
30.5
5
-increasing moisture
20.2
10 _::: •
Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
_ No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
•
•
15 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
-- information presented on this log.
Logged By ND TEST PIT NO. 2
Date 8-15-89 Bev. 15.5±
0
sm Gray silty :SAND, moist, medium dense
5
ml SILT and fine sand with clay, wet, medium dense
35.2
•
10 sm Graysilty
SAND, moist, medium dense •
Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15
•
4i'r ��� ��� TEST PIT LOGS
��
II (%V 1J�� , Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION
` Geoterhnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists KING COUNTY, WON FACILITYTON
Proj. No. 4563 1 Drwn. GLS Sept'89 Checked ND I Date 9-21-89 Plate 7
TEST PIT NO. 3
Logged By ND
Date 8-15-89 Bev. 14±
Depth W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
0 x
t'�. sm Gray silty SAND, moist, medium dense
f::c:
5 --*::,4
— c1-ml Gray silty SAND with clay, moist, medium dense
29.2
-
ml Gray silty SAND with fine clay, moist, medium
- dense •
10 — 31.3
•
Test pit' terminated at 11 feet below existing grade. •
_
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
•
15 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of.other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility tor the use or interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
Logged By ND
TEST PIT NO. 4.
Date 8-15-89 Elev. 14±
0
_ . sm Gray-light brown silty SAND, moist, medium dense
:'::,:-•--r to dense
•
5 - ii:..
.{•:
ml-cl DarkgraysiltySAND with clay,
moist, medium 28.4
dense
10 — / -increasing clay content • 36.9
_ Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15
•
le ( TEST PIT LOGS
i/��� ��� i�
i Earth Consultants Inc.%��� Cero,echnical Engineers.Geologists l4 Environmental Scientists ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITYKING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS I Sept'89 Checked ND 1 Date 9-21-89 I Plate 8
TEST PIT NO. 5
Logged By ND
Date 8-15-89 Elev. 17±
Depth W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
iliV. sm Gray-light brown silty SAND, dry - moist, medium
j.i.: dense
• .::
I
1 — :i -some clay and decomposed organic debris
5 .
y%�`lcl-ml Dark gray silty SAND, moist to wet, medium dense
cl Dark gray-bluish CLAY with some fine sand/silt,
moist soft to 35..5
medium stiff
1 10 / 38.1
— •
Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
. information presented on this log.
Logged By ND TEST PIT NO. • 6
Date 8-15-89 Elev. 11±
0
sm Gray silty SAND, dry. - moist; medium dense.
:1,
cl-ml , Silty CLAY, moist, soft with some red stain
5 and 'organic debris 45.8
�f
cl Bluish CLAY, moist, medium stiff
I
• 936
10 :+.. :• sm Black silty SAND, moist, medium dense 27.1
— Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
Groundwater seepage encountered at 10 feet during
excavation.
' 15
iit a 4 TEST PIT LOGS
irEarth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
_1 1 Ofl'ki GeotechnicalEngineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS I Sept'89 - Checked ND I Date 9-21-89 ' Plate 9
TEST PIT NO. 7
Logged By ND
Date 8-15-89 Elev. 13±
Depth • W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
�::'�tt �: sm GraysiltySAND, dry - moist, medium dense
—I•�•ia:+atill.?
1
�'/V cl Gray CLAY, moist, medium stiff with red/brown
%/ stain and decomposed roots 29.5
• 5
34
10
4— Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade. •
— • No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time end location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
•
Logged By ND TEST PIT .NO. 8
Date 8-15-89 Elev. 14.2±
0 a:::
•}.� •�• sm Gray silty SAND, dry, medium dense
_ 0 cl-ml CLAY with fine silt, wet, soft to medium stiff
'•with red stain and small roots .
— 38.4
5
—
39
•
10
_ Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
—
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15
•
•
i/�!" ��� Uq TEST PIT LOGS
11Ir `�,‘ Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
Geotcxhnicaltingi eers.GeologLsis&EnvironmentalScieniLsts KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 Drwn. GLS Sept'89 Checked ND I Date 9-21-89 ' Plate
1'0
TEST PIT NO. 9
Logged By ND
Date 8-15-89 Elev. 12.5±
• Depth W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
0 .#1.
,._, T:�i sm Gray silty SAND, dry, medium dense
-
%cl-ml Gray CLAY with some silt, moist, medium stiff
-
43.8
5 —
cl Bluish CLAY, wet, soft to medium stiff
/ 36.2
- Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
_ No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15
- Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
, information presented on this log.
Logged By ND TEST PIT NO. _ - 10
Date 8-15-89 Bev. 11.5±
0 • ••
:ti. .>: sm Gray silty SAND, dry - moist, medium dense.
Y,/
cl-mi Gray CLAY/SILT, moist, medium stiff with red
stain
5 ,
I
38.5
•
- -traces of peat at 9'
l' 10 — 4 54.3
- Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
_ No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. .
-- 15
•
•
i/�t� '���� iIA TEST PIT LOGS
Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
•
��ht IIIl' F) Geotechntcal Engineers.Geologists&Environmental Scientists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS 1 Sept'89 Checked ND I Date 9-21-89 Plate 11
TEST PIT NO. 11
•
Logged By ND
•
Date 8-15-89 Bev. 16.5±
Depth W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
0 is t:i::
_:�:a:.:'s sm Light brown silty SAND with gravel, dry,
::0 dense
- 18.1
sm Gray silty SAND, moist - dry, dense
17.5
5 —..,;?::::; sm Gray silty SAND with CLAY and peat, moist - wet,
�-' ::t
medium stiff
-{ 24.2
. 10 '
_ Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
-
•
•
15 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
Logged By ND TEST PIT NO. 12
Date 8-15-89 Elev. 16.5±
' 0
_ 3 sm Light brown silty SAND with gravel, dry, dense 6.7
is
- _' sm-pt Gray dark silty SAND with peat and boulders,
- moist, dense
5 —
- Test pit terminated at 8 feet below existing grade.
10 — No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15
iAN AV A\ TEST PIT LOGS
�1 �,`, Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists&Environmrnal Scirntisis KING COUNTY, WASHINGOTN
Proj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS I Sept'89 Checked ND I Date 9-21-89 Plate '12
•
•
TEST PIT NO.. 101
Logged By SD ,
Date 9-13-89 'Elev. 40±
Depth W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
0 ::liii (6" of SOD)
`-.:::tii SM Tan to brown siltySAND with angular g gravel and
ti: ::: rock moist medium dense 14
#i ': White silty SAND, little angular gravel, moist
:::,: •:,: dense
5 —
Sedimentary structure (oxidized) visible in
`- :,_•.::,;; soil/rock
-',`:'•`:: thin bands •of ochre oxidation 10
::2•:::::: SM
•� r:••• (weathered sandstone)
- . 'Test pit terminated at 8 feet below existing grade..
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
10 —
. 15 • Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
Logged By SD TEST PIT NO. -102
Date 9-13-89 Elev. 50±
0 _ • 'i. (6" of SOD)
. : SM Tan to brown silty SAND, some gravel, moist, 14
medium dense
I ri
�i:i� Gray to brown silty SAND, some• • gravel, partially
"'•.::
5 J` cemented , medium dense
�:
:J sm Grayish white silty SAND, moist, dense
:ill
- i (weathered sandstone)
- • Test pit terminated at 8 feet below existing grade.
10 — No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15
d�!`� ��� i(!�� TEST PIT LOGS
(I% Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
�►��� echoicalEngineers.Geologss&EnvironmentalSciemisis KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Prjoj. No. 4563 Drwn. GLS Sept'89 Checked SD Date 9-21-89 Plate 13
•
•
TEST PIT NO. 103
Logged By SD 4, r
Date 9-13-89 Elev. 35±
Depth W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
0 : 1rr}:p. (6" of SOD)
i;
— :1::r:j:Cti
;;::1 sm Tan to brown silty SAND, some gravel, moist,
medium dense to dense
- ; :: Brownish white silty SAND, moist, dense
5 — . .t 14
SM Grades to white silty SAND, moist, dense
- :l: with ochre staining
(weathered sandstone)
-
Test pit terminated at 8 feet below existing grade. •
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
10 —
•
15 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
Logged By SD TEST PIT NO. 104
Date 9-13-89 Bev. 25±
0 tr`' ' �" •
..an. � Tan to brown silty SAND with gravel, moist,
� medium dense (topsoil)
-J:::}€:; Light brown silty SAND, moist, medium dense
- i, sm .Grades to an orange silty SAND, moist, medium •
5 —:•: dense to dense, ochre (oxidation) staining .
•- ::ii• (weathered sandstone)
_ ,Test pit terminated at 8 feet below existing grade.
:No• groundwater seepage ecnountered during excavation.
10 —
•
15
•
•
u��i/��� A�� TEST PIT LOGS
4011 `�,`� ) Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
Geotechnical Engineers,Geologists&Environmental Scientists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Pfoj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS I Sept'89 I Checked SD I
Date 9-21-89 I Plate 14
1
TEST PIT NO. 105 ,
• Logged By SD
Date 9-13-89 Bev. 20±
Depth
(ft.) USCS .Soil Description (%)
EEiitim (6" topsoil)
sm Tan silty. SAND, moist, dense
sm White silty SAND, moist, dense
ss White SANDSTONE, slightly weathered, very hard
5 — Test pit terminated at 3.5 feet below existing grade.
: No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
10 —
•
15
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
' . information presented on this log.
•
•
r
p • TEST PIT LOGS
Earth Consultants& Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists Environmental Scientlsts KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS I Sept'89 Checked SD Date 9-21-89 ' Plate
15
• A
P
•
P
E
N
D
X
r
B
p ,, heiiX
APPENDIX B
E-4563
LABORATORY TESTING
General
We conducted laboratory tests on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the
field soil classification of the units encountered and to evaluate the material's general
physical properties and engineering characteristics. A brief description of each of the tests
performed for this study is provided below. The results of laboratory tests performed on
specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual boring
II log or on a separate data sheet contained in this Appendix. However, it is important to note
that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. All of
! our recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in
guiding our engineering judgement. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of
these data by others.
In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for
this project will be discarded after a period of thirty (30) days following completion of this
report unless we are otherwise directed in writing.
Soil Classification
As mentioned earlier, all soil samples are visually examined in the field by our representative
at the time they are obtained. They are subsequently packaged and returned to our Bellevue
office where they are independently reexamined by one of our engineers and the original
description is verified or modified, as necessary. With the help of information obtained from
classification tests, the samples are described in general accordance with the Unified
Classification System, ASTM Test Method D-2487-83. The resulting descriptions are
provided at the appropriate sample location on the individual boring or test pit log and are
qualitative only. The attached Legend, Plate 3, provides pictorial symbols that match the
written descriptions.
Moisture Content
Moisture content tests were performed on the samples obtain from the borings and test pits.
The purpose of these tests is to approximately ascertain the in-place moisture content of the
soil sample tested. The moisture content is determined in general accordance with ASTM
Test Method D-2216-80. The information obtained assists us by providing qualitative
information regarding soil strength and compressibility. The results of these tests are
presented at the appropriate sample depth on the boring and test pit logs.
- l
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Particle Size Analysis
Detailed grain size analyses were conducted on several of the shallow soil samples to
determine the size distribution of the sampled soil. The test is performed in general
accordance with ASTM Test Method D-422-63. The information gained from this analysis
allows us to provide a detailed description and classification of the in-place materials. The
results are presented on Plates 16 and 17, and classification symbols are provided as part of
the appropriate individual sample descriptions on the boring logs.
Atterberg Limits
Because of the large amounts of fines in some of the sampled soils from the field, we
deemed it necessary to perform several Atterberg Limit tests on the finer materials to
determine the soils plasticity characteristics and as an aid in accurate classification of the
soils. These tests include the liquid and plastic limits which were performed in general
accordance with ASTM Test Methods D-423-66(72) and D-424-59(71), respectively. The
Plastic Index, the difference between the liquid and plastic limits, is then determined. The
results of the liquid limit provide a measure of the tested soils shear strength and is
analogous to the direct shear test. When coupled with the plastic index, the results help us
to classify the in-place soils on the basis of these soil characteristics. The result of these
tests are presented on the Plate 18, Atterberg Limits Test Data.
•
Earth Consultants, Inc.
SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
SIZE OF OPENING-IN INCHES -I NUMBER-OF-MESH-PER-INCH.-U.S.STANDARD- —GRAIN-SIZE_IN_MM- ___
N v ao O O p 00 00 0 0 Q O N O co O O O O
to I. (q N .-'- .-c7 vi N �• O00 N M t0 DO N O O O O O O O O O O O o
100 •-�*
�—' .
;_t d 80 1 20
® tri m
rggu
© m
l'fA n nm 70 • ' so
Z � ` n
g'Wags —i \\\
22
w,0. m6040 -
ai IV Z n
crz f• rit DO
50 - •0 50
73
Ow (111 CO !n
O. -< m
M ao 60
o
m W
4 , 6 L
—I so �o m
p 20 80 -1
Z •
0
10 90
aN til
ui ti _
al COH Z 0 I 1 ( 1 1 1 1 I I (11 1 1 1 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 100
Z d O O O O O O O O O CO W a Cl N .- 00 CD. a Cl N , O CO .7 Cl N M O M N 1•-
0 0 0 00 (O . ClN ' 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0
U D M N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS ' 0 0 0 0 O O
Z
c o y COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE FINES
CD ,Z 7d COBBLES GRAVEL SAND
H H N
cn F< w m
CDO ct H z Boring or DEPTH Moisture
op z D KEY Test Pit No. (ft.) USCS DESCRIPTION Content (%) LL PL
W M
® n N 0 B-1 22.5 SM Silty SAND 33
-D H H
m 0 H a—.-- TP-1 8 ML SILT with sand 20
H
H 0 ......••-. TP-11 4.5 ML Sandy SILT 17.5
rn
•—•— TP-12 6 SM Silty SAND 19.5
SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
- - SIZE OF-OPENING-IN INCHES- i NUMBER-OF-MESH PER INCH, U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM
,..„402.841+ ; p 0 w .t m No �-
N N v 00 N °D v O f0 O O O 0 0 O p O c0 d' M N O O 0 0 O O
��` 100 CD ct m N C.- .-c'�-1(�t �..-....• - 00.- '- N M in(.0 CO'-
O O O O p O. O. O. O. O O.
L]'_ 0
•
90 0N
II _ . . 10
n W LL,J m 80 , 20
0 • \ m
ycon m 70 , 30 n
pg z %.
m
z
Ia.r m 60 I".11 40 "I
Li 0
. n,n m 0
° tomDU
;.
32 Q�' 50 .� 50
ea
9 co _ • N
m '< _ _ � I 1 mfrasm
°'a m 40 `\ 11 60 Co
„, .
�--I 30 70
• m
-v =
p 20 _ 80 ...1
2 -
0
td 10 90
A N -
w Z d 0 I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I l i I I I I I I I l I I III I 100
O O O O O O O O O 00 CD Cr m N '-r7 00 O Tr. m N t- CO (D Ct m N O (D m O N
U 0 0 0 00 0 V m N r• • 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O
�.n
0O H D m N 1- GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS ' ' 0 0 0 0 O 0
11) IA COARSE I FINE COARSE 1 MEDIUM I FINE
m 1-3 H COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES
i-. W NI
rn m
0 H
r P OZ Boring or DEPTH Moisture
00 . x z D KEY Test Pit No. t.) USCS DESCRIPTION Content (%) LL PL
r
l0 H hi ..‹
z > CO
y H m
—o 0 TP-101 2 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel 14
or
ET Z H
L--— TP-101 8 SM White silty SAND • 10
CD 1-
H ❑ TP-102 2 SM Light tan silty SAND 14
•--•— TP-103 5 SM Cream color silty SAND 14
100
80
x 60
1
2
>-
i H Q
i- 40cn
•
20y
€679—
CL-ML
6-0
1 0 20 40 60 80 100
LIQUID LIMIT
Natural
Key Boring/ Depth Soil Classification USCS L.L. P.L. 1?I. Water
Test Pit (ft) Content
• B-2 17.5 Sandy SILT ML 25 22 3
A TP-2 6.5 SILT ML 27 27 0
-- i
• TP-3 6.5 Lean CLAY, silt CL-ML 25 21 4
i
O TP-4 10 SILT ML 30 29 1
0
Atterberg Limits Test Data
1,, 4 Earth ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
�p •i Consultants Inc. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Geotechnical Engineering and Geology 1
I I Proj. No. 4563I Date Sept'89 Plate 18
•
SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
• I . • ' . lull= rlal a-
D Ili -
•▪ °,• ° . •.
o !•b• •o'•
•.•0;
o ° ..,;.•0.•0 ,Do .,
III=11) '� e,�,,'.o '. '' .•o,
III 1 ft. min.
1ft.min. Compacted Subgrade
LEGEND
Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material.
o..' 'P•'." Free draining, organic free granular material with a maximum
=•° size of 3 inches, containing no more than 5 percent fines
(silt and clay size particles passing the No. 200 mesh sieve).
Impermeable visqueen barrier or other impermeable material
approved by geotechnical engineer.
Weephole and drainage pocket as described below.
Drain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with
Operforations or slots facing down; tight jointed; with a
positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic
pipe. Drain line should be bedded on. and surrounded
with free draining 1 inch minus rock or pea gravel, as
desired. The drainrock may be encapsulated with a geo-
technical drainage fabric at the engineers discretion.
NOTES:
• For free standing walls, weepholes may be used. Surround weep-
- holes with no less than 18 inches of 1 inch minus rock.
04 I' Earth RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND BACKFILL
Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
Consulting Engineers,Geologists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
U Environmental Scientists
Proj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS I Date Sept'89 Checked SD I Dated 9-21-891 Plate 19
SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
Ar
✓ r
✓ r
✓ r
r r
................................. ......................... ........................
as r
.............................................................................................
.....................................................................................
is>:
....
iiiiY
i ::::::•:::::'::'::::'ii::>:s:: ':i::yQ•i:'i;:':::;{:::�:':•+i:t:;{4:'ii:i';?'i;• ?:':':'.�:':':':•:•:•'::
•
I I i-ui ir--1i1.:::::::.:
NOTES:
• Base consists of 3/4 - inch thick, 2 foot by 2 foot plywood with
center drilled 5/8 - inch diameter hole.
• Bedding material, if required, should consist of Traction Sand.
• Marker rod is 1/2- inch diameter steel rod threaded at both ends.
• Marker rod is attached to base by nut and washer on each side
of base.
• Protective sleeve surrounding marker rod should consist of 2- inch
diameter plastic tubing. Sleeve is not attached to rod or base.
• Additional sections of steel rod can be connected with threaded
couplings.
• Additional sections of plastic sleeve can be connected with
press - fit plastic couplings.
• Steel marker rod should extend at least 5 inches above top of
plastic sleeve.
• Marker should extend at least 2 feet above top of fill surface.
TYPICAL SETTLEMENT MARKER DETAIL
Earth
Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
Consulting Engineers,Geologists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
U Environmental Scientists
Proj. No. 4563 Drwn. GLS I Date Sept 89 Checked SD Dated 9-21-89 I Plate 20
SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
FLOOR SLAB ,.T
7-1-•
�! b..
II =11 .�. _ • •
III ' •• III=III
I `. .1;. •�4;. I.Q .• •s �..1 '�,.
•.�• ..• -. ... .-. .. . •
— ill
I I
1 o _9
0
1
l I
(I( =III 111=111=])1=11)= 111-111- 111):.I i11 )l _� »1=--1'I: I'..:_:I I/1
H) =111
:= -n1=1�1_10 Ti=i 1- I l
—11I NATIVE SOIL I1 I I I 1 111
LEGEND
• '' :<` Free draining, organic free, granular material with a maximum
size of 3 inches, containing. no more than 5 percent fines
(silt and clay size particles passing the No. 200 mesh sieve]
or other material approved by geotechnical engineer.
Capillary break consisting of not less than 4 inches of free
draining sand or gravel, typically overlain with a visqueen
vapor barrier.
In:Al, Footing drain surrounded with washed rock.
°o b'
NOTES:
• Structural fill should extend a lateral distance beyond the footing
perimeter equal to or greater than the depth of fill, D : feet.
• Depth of structural fill beneath capillary break and slab, H = feet.
• Structural fill should be placed in thin loose lifts not exceeding 10
inches in thickness. Each lift should be compacted to no less than
the degree specified in the site preparation, and earth work section
of this report. No additional lift should be placed until compaction
is achieved.
• Excavated cut slopes should be at a stable angle, and should meet
all local, state and national safety requirements.
• Excavation subgrade should be recompacted before placing any
structural fill. Geotechnical fabric may be required if subgrade is
soft or unstable. at geotechnical engineers discretion.
SCHEMATIC STRUCTURAL FILL
Earth
.• Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY\
i '• It. Consulting Engineers,Geologists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
U Environmental Scientists
Proj. No. 4563 f Drwn. GLS I Date Sept'89 Checked SD I Dated 9-21-89 Plate 21
•
SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
0
0
o
O °O ,
SLOPE TO DRAIN ;,:,.: � o o ,
°
•o
00 °o
6 inch min. o 0.°
°°
0
O
..• �• . • .e •••O. •° a .p.
•
•
'• ••. Lp••"• ••
••
• p•• • : "+ °
• • s,:Q.; ' O•
" •. . ••
0
° o 0 18 inch min.
_',o;':°• .••.o•• •.. .o4I•• , .o Q.o -
•
:0: �•
•.O.••• •1• •• `i•.••• :I••!•••• •' . ° O o a
4 inch min. • •: '. ° °° ° ° ° '
diameter .•'•O'• :. .�''• O• •'. ,A•.'�°•
-o ° ° ° ° 0. ,o
j
I
2 inch min.
2 inch min./ 4 inch max. 12 inch
min.
LEGEND
" Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability ,
A - material.
_••• . walls ;
Section 9-03. 12121 , or Fine Aggregate for Portlind
Cement Concrete ; Section 9-03.1 121.
ODrain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with
perforations or slots facing down; tight jointed ; with a
positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic
pipe. Do not tie building downspout drains into footing
lines.
— — — Impermeable visqeen barrier or other impermeable
material approved by Geotechnical Engineer. •
Earth TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL
10411i
consultants Inc.
ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
Consulting Engineers.Geologists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
U Environmental Scientists
Proj. No. 4563 Drwn. GLS I
Date Sept'89 Checked SD I Dated 9-21-89 Plate 22
II
( 1 C
P
P
E
N
D
1
X
-- C
ARC
o4.s.sociated Tacker" Contractors
P.O. Box 1794 Woodinville, Washington 98072
(206) 481-3456 or (206) 481-7222
ASSOCIATED ROCKERY CONTRACTORS
STANDARD ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES
1.01 Introduction:
1.01.1 Historical Background: These standard rockery construction guidelines have been developed in an effort
to provide a more stringent degree of control on rockery materials and construction methodology in the Pacific
Northwest. They have been assembled from numerous other standards presently in use in the area, from expertise
provided by local geotechnical engineers, and from the wide experience of the members of the Association of
Rockery Contractors (ARC).
1.01.2 Goal: The primary goals of this document are to standardize the methods of construction for rockery
rockerys over four feet in height, and to provide a warranty for the materials used in construction and the
workmanship employed in construction. This standard has also been developed in a manner that makes it, to the
best of ARC's knowledge, more stringent than the other standards presently in use by local municipalities.
2.01 Materials:
2.01.1 Rock Quality: All rock shall be sound, weathering resistant, angular ledge rock. The longest dimension
of any individual rock should not exceed three times its shortest dimension. Acceptability of rock will be
determined by laboratory tests as hereinafter specified, geologic examination and historical'usage records.
All rock delivered to and incorporated in the project shall meet the following minimum specifications:
a. Absorption Not snore than 2.0%for igneous and metamorphic rock types.
Not more than 3.0%for sedimentary rock types.
b. Accelerated Expansion (15 days)
(CRD-C-148) *1, *2 Not more than 15% breakdown
c. Soundness
(MgSO4 at 5 cycles) Not greater than 5% loss
(CRD-C-137) •
•
d. Unconfined Compressive Strength Intact strength of 15,000 psi, or greater for igneous and
ASTM D 2938-79 (reapproved 1979) metamorphic rocks, and 8000 psi or greater for sedimentary rock.
*1. The test sample will be prepared and tested in accordance with Corps of Engineers Testing procedure CRD-C-
148, 'Method of Testing Stone for Expansive Breakdown on Soaking in Ethylene Glycol." Test requirements of not
more than 15 percent breakdown will be computed by dividing the number of individual pieces of initial sample
suffering breakdown (that is, separating into two or more pieces) by the total number of initial pieces in the sample.
*2. Accelerated expansion tests should also include analyses of the fractures and veins found in the rock. Many
problems associated with rockenv failures arc related to the rock fractures and veins found within the rock and not the
rock itself.
4/4/89 Page 1
2.01.2 Frequency of Testing: Quarry sources for rockery rock shall begin a,testing program when either becoming
a supplier or when a new area of the source pit is opened. The tests described in Section 2.01.1 shall be
performed for every four thousand (4000) tons for the first twelve thousand (12000) tons of material blasted and
removed to establish that specific rock source. The tests shall then be performed once a year or at an apparent
change in material. If problems with a specific area in a pit or with a particular material are encountered, the
initial testing cycle shall be restarted.
2.013 Rock Density: Recognizing that numerous sources of rock exist, and that the nature of rock will vary not
only between sources but also within each source, the density of the rock shall be greater than one hundred fifty-
five (155) pcf. Typically, rocks used for rockery construction shall be sized approximately as follows:
Rock Size Rock Weight
Small to large 50-200 pounds
one man
Small to large 200-700 pounds
two man
Small to large 700-2000 pounds
three man
Small to large 2000-4000 pounds
four man
Five Man 4000-6000 pounds
Six Man 6000-8000 pounds
Two and one-man rock, and sometimes smaller, are often used to fill surface gaps along the top of the completed
rockery to create an aesthetically pleasing surface. This is an acceptable practice provided none of the events
described in Section 3.01.5 occur, and that the owner prevents people from climbing or walking on the completed
rockery.
In rockeries over eight feet in height, it should not be possible to move the large sized rocks (four to six-man size)
with a prybar. If these rocks can be moved, the rockery should not be considered capable of restraining any
significant lateral load. However, it is both practical and even desirable that smaller rocks, particularly those used
for "chinking" purposes, can be moved with a prybar to achieve the "best fit".
2.01.4 Submittals: The rock source shall present current geologic and test data for the testing for the minimum
guidelines described in Section 2.01.1 on request by either the rockery contractor, the client, or the applicable
municipality.
3.01 Rockery Construction:
3.01.1 General: Rockery construction is a craft and depends largely on the skill and experience of the builder.
A rockery is a protective system which helps to retard the weathering and erosion process on an exposed cut or
fill soil face. While by its nature (the mass, size and shape of the rocks) it will provide some degree of reten-
tion, it is not a designed or engineered system in the sense a reinforced concrete retaining rockery would be
considered designed or engineered. The degree of retention achieved is dependant on the size of rock used; that
is, the mass or weight, and the height of the rockery being constructed. The larger the rock, the more competent
the rockery. To accomplish this, all rockeries in excess of four feet in height should be built on a "mass" basis.
To provide a competent and adequate rockery structure, all rockeries constructed in front of either cuts or fills
in excess of eight feet in height should be bid and constructed in accordance with these standard guidelines and
the geotechnical engineers supplemental recommendations. Both the standard guidelines and the supplemental
geotechnical recommendations should be provided to prospective bidders before bidding and the start of
construction.
4/4/89 Page 2
The same geotechnical engineer should he retained to monitor rockery construction and to verify, in writing, that
the rockery was constructed in general accordance with this ARC standard and with his supplemental recommenda-
tions, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable materials.
3.01.2 Geotechnical Engineer: The geotcchnical engineer retained to provide necessary supplemental rockery
construction guidelines shall be a practicing geotechnical/civil engineer licensed as a professional civil engineer in
the State of Washington who has at least four years of professional employment as a geotechnical engineer in
responsible charge, including experience with fill construction and stability and rockery construction. The
geotechnical engineer should he hired either by the rockery contractor or the client.
3.013 Responsibility: The ultimate responsibility for rockery construction should remain with the rockery builder.
However, rockeries protecting moderate to thick fills, with steep sloping surfaces above or below them, with
multiple steps, with foundation or other loads affecting them, protecting sandy or gravelly soils subject to ravelling,
with seepage or wet conditions, or that are more than eight feet in height, all represent special conditions and
require consultation and/or advice from qualified experts.
3.01.4 Workmanship: All workmanship is guaranteed by the rockery contractor and all materials are guaranteed
by supplying quarry for a period of six years from the date of completion of erection, providing no modification
or changes to the conditions existing at the time of completion are made.
3.01.5 Changes to Finished Product: Such changes include, but are not necessarily limited to, excavation of
ditches or trenches within a distance of less than 1.5 times the rockery height measured from the toe of the
rockery, removal of any material from the subgrade in front of the rockery, excavation and/or removal of material
from any location behind the rockery within a distance at_least equal to the rockery's height, the addition of any
surcharge or other loads within a similar distance of the top of the rockery, or surface or subsurface water forced,
directed, or otherwise caused to flow behind the rockery in any quantity.
3.01.6 Slopes: Slopes above rockeries should be kept as flat as possible, but should not exceed 2:1 (Horizon-
tal:Vertical) unless the rockery is designed specifically to provide some restraint to the load imposed by the slope.
Any slope existing above a completed rockery should be provided with a vegetative cover by the owner to help
reduce the potential for surface water flow induced erosion. It should consist of a deep rooted, rapid growth
vegetative mat and typically will be placed by hydroseeding and covered with a mulch. It is often useful to overlay
the seed and mulch with either pegged in-place jute matting, or some other form of approved geotechnical fabric,
to help maintain the seed in-place until the root mat has an opportunity to germinate and take hold.
3.01.7 Monitoring: All rockeries constructed against cuts or fills in excess of eight feet in height shall be
periodically monitored during construction by the geotechnical engineer to verify the nature and quality of the
materials being used are appropriate, that the construction procedures are appropriate, and that the rockery is
being constructed in a generally professional manner and in accordance with this ARC standards and any
supplemental recommendations.
On completion of the rockery, the geotechnical engineer shall submit to the client, the rockery contractor, and to
the appropriate municipality, copies of his rockery examination reports along with a final report summarizing
rockery construction.
3.01.8 Fill Compaction: Where rockeries are constructed in front of a fill, it is imperative that the owner ensure
the fill be placed and compacted in a manner that will provide a competent fill mass. To achieve this goal, all
fills should consist of relatively clean, organic and debris free, granular materials with a maximum size of four
inches. Ideally, but particularly if placement and compaction is to take place during the wet season, they should
contain no more than five percent fines (silt and clay size particles passing the number 200 mesh sieve).
All fills should be placed in thin lifts not exceeding ten inches in loose thickness. Each lift should be compacted
to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Method D-1557-78 (Modified
Proctor), before any additional fill is placed and compacted. In-place density tests should be performed at random
locations within each lift of the fill to verify this degree of compaction is being achieved.
4/4/89 Page 3
3.01.9 Fill Construction and Reinforcement: There are two methods of constructing a fill against which to build
a rockery. The first, which typically applies to rockeries of less than eight feet in height, is to overbuild and then
cut back the fill. The second, which applies to all rockeries in excess of eight feet in height, is to construct the
fill using a geogrid or geotechnical fabric reinforcement.
Overbuilding the fill allows for satisfactory compaction of the fill mass out beyond the location of the fill face to
be protected. Overbuilding also allows the earthwork contractor to use larger and more effective compaction
equipment in his compactive efforts, thereby typically achieving a more competent fill mass. Cutting back into
the well compacted fill also typically results in construction of a competent near vertical fill face against which to
build the rockery.
For the higher rockeries the use of a geogrid or geotechnical fabric to help reinforce the fill results in construction
of a more stable fill face against which to construct the rockery. This form of construction leads to a longer
lasting and more stable rockery and helps reduce the risk of significant long term maintenance.
This latter form of construction requires a design by the geotechnical engineer for each specific case. The vertical
spacing of the reinforcement, the specific type of reinforcement, and the distance to which it must extend back into
the fill, and the amount of lapping must be determined on a rockery-by-rockery basis.
3.01.10 Rockers, Keyway: The first step in rockery construction, after general site clearing and/or general
excavation, is to construct a keyway in which to build the rockery. The keyway shall comprise a shallow trench
of between twelve (12) and eighteen (18) inches in depth, extending for the full length of the rockery, and inclined
back slightly towards the face being protected. It is typically dug as wide as the rockery (including the width of
the rock filter layer).
If the condition of the protected face is of concern, the keyway should be constructed in sections of manageable
length, that is of a length that can be constructed in one shift or one days work.
The competency of the keyway subgrade to support the rockery shall be verified by probing with a small diameter
steel rod. The rod shall leave a diameter of between three-eights and one-half inch, and shall be pushed into
the subgrade in a smooth unaided manner under the body weight of the prober only.
Penetration of up to six inches, with some difficulty, shall indicate a "competent" keyway subgrade unless other
factors in the geotechnical engineer's opinion shall indicate otherwise. Penetration in excess of six inches, or of
that depth with ease, shall indicate a "soft" subgrade and one that could require treatment. Soft areas of the
subgrade can be "firmed up" by tamping a layer of coarse quarry spalls into the subgrade.
3.01.11 Keyway and Rockers, Drainage: On completion of keyway excavation, a shallow ditch or trench, approxi-
mately twelve (12) inches wide and deep, should be dug along the rear edge of the keyway. A minimum four-
inch diameter perforated or slotted ADS drain pipe, or equivalent approved by an engineer, should be placed in
this shallow trench and should be bedded on and surrounded by a free-draining crushed rock. Burial of the drain
pipe in this shallow trench provides protection to the pipe and helps prevent it from being inadvertently crushed
by pieces of the rockery rock. This drain pipe should be installed with sufficient gradient to initiate flow, and
should be connected to a positive and permanent discharge.
Positive and permanent drainage should be considered to mean an existing, or to be installed, storm drain system,
a swale, ditch or other form of surface water flow collection system, a detention or retention pond, or other
stable native site feature or previously installed collection system.
3.01.12 Rockery Thickness: The individual rockery thickness, including the rock filter layer, should be at least
40 percent of the rockery height. Unless otherwise specified in writing by the rockery "designer" the individual
rocks should be arranged in a single course which, when measured to include the filter layer, is equal to the
required rockery thickness.
4/4/89 Page 4
3.01.13 Rock Selection: The contractor should have sufficient space available:so that he can select from among
a number of stockpiled rocks for each space in the rockery to he filled. Rocks which have shapes which do not
match the spaces offered by the previous course of rock should be placed elsewhere to obtain a better fit.
Rock should be of a generally cubical, tabular or semi-rectangular shape. Any rocks of basically rounded or
tetrahedral form should be rejected or used for filling large void spaces.
Smaller rocks (one to two-man size, or smaller) are often used to create an aesthetically pleasing "top edge" to
a rockery. This is acceptable provided none of the events described in Section 3.01.5 occur, and that people are
prevented from climbing or walking on the finished rockery. This is the owner's responsibility.
3.01.14 Rock Placement: The first course of rock should be placed on firm unyielding soil. There should be full
contact between the rock and soil, which may require shaping of the ground surface or slamming or dropping the
rocks into place so that the soil foundation conforms to the rock face bearing on it. As an alternative, it is
satisfactory to place and tamp crushed rock into the subgrade to tighten it up. The bottom of the first course
of rock should be a minimum of twelve (12) inches below the lowest adjacent site grade.
As the rockery is constructed, the rocks should be placed so that there are no continuous joint planes in either
the vertical or lateral direction. Each rock should bear on at least two rocks below it. Rocks should be placed
so that there is some bearing between flat rock faces rather than on joints. Joints between courses should slope
downward towards the material being protected (away from the face of the rockery).
3.01.15 Face Inclination: The face of the rockery should be inclined at a gradient of about 1:6 (Horizontal:-
Vertical) back towards the face being protected. The inclination should not constructed flatter than 1H:4V.
3.01.16 Voids: Because of the nature of the product used to construct a rockery, it is virtually impossible to avoid
creating void spaces between individual rocks. However, it should be recognized that voids do not necessarily
constitute a problem in rockery construction.
Where voids of greater than six inches in dimension exist in the face of a rockery they should be visually examined
to determine if contact between the rocks exists within the thickness of the rockery. If contact does exist, no
further action is required. However, if there is no rock contact within the rockery thickness the void should be
"chinked" with a smaller piece of rock. If a void of greater than six inches exists in the rear face of the rockery,
it should be "chinked" with a smaller rock.
3.01.17 Filter Laver: In order to provide some degree of drainage control behind the rockery, and as a means
of helping to prevent loss of soil through the face of the rockery, a drainage filter shall be installed layer between
the rear face of the rockery and the soil face being protected. This filter layer should be at least twelve (12)
inches thick; and for rockerys in excess of eight feet in height, it should be at least eighteen (18) inches thick.
It should be composed of four inch minus crushed rock, or other material approved by the geotechnical engineer.
If one of the rockery rocks extends back to the exposed soil face, it is not necessary that the filter rock layer
extend between it and the soil face.
In the event seepage is encountered emanating from a protected face, we recommend the use of a well-graded
filter layer. We do not recommend the use of a geotechnical fabric for other than coverage of relatively small and
isolated seepage areas because it has been the industry's experience that the filter fabric tends to clog rapidly.
This quickly leads to a buildup of hydrostatic pressure which can subsequently cause failure and collapse of the
rockery and is to be avoided.
This clogging is apparently due to the virtual impossibility of achieving full contact between the soil face, fabric
and rock filter material. If full surface contact cannot be achieved, there is often a tendency for the soil materials
to flush from the protected face into the "pockets" in the fabric which leads to the aforementioned clogging.
4/4/89 Page 5
3.01.18 Surface Drainne: It is the owner's responsibility to intercept surface drainage from above the rockery
and direct it away from the rockery to a positive and permanent discharge well below and beyond the toe of the
rockery. Use of other drainage control measures should be determined on a case-by-case basis by the geotechnical
engineer prior to bidding on the project.
w 4N�I
cotyiy -r
orefe,*ram ��.
4/4/89 Page 6
O.0 O 0 O
•
DO
4 � D
0
D
O
T
a
a
A
O 0 0 Z
0 0
0
0
D
op
; 4
Do
D D
A
l D
O O D O O O 0
O 0,00
O O 0 ''';�!�r:�••.::.�iisi:ii•:::::::::::::::i::•i:•i:i'r:i:vi:ii:S�:i•i:•ii:•:�iii:i
OOOD 0 p 00
0 O O O
0 �i:�ii'}i::�i':'�iii:i iii�;:?i?;%:•i:�ji'�iii:�'�:v'L'v:?:ii}i::}iiiii:�?ii:�:�':
, O D p 0 0 D__ Z Z
1 O O O
I O D
O
00 O
O
O O
\ O O O
e 0 o •
:2:S:i>:'•,'.: ��:Ioi!r:.. 1MiR.1!�... .: ��:
6 � 0o•000 o.D o T
DO 00 p OA O Z2
P
A O O O D O
p
/ 0 00 O
H
O 00
00.0.O D .O :;; M..;;;i:::::::::::.�:ii:•::i:ti::•:4i:::.�:�::{ivii:•:i:�:i•iiiiii::3:
5 .
\ 0
O O
O O
O
D D � Z
2
.O O
Dp.
D'• •O
O
• D
O
0
O D
OD
O•O
•
O6
•O
O.O
Z
•
•O•
1
1 /
..
• a e..
i ppE
B ► LR
L •
EGEND
Crushed rock filter material ranging between 4 and 11/2 inches in size and free •
O O '
.°o:e o.. of organics, with less than 5 percent fines (silt and clay size particles passing
• • the No. 200.mesh sieve).
Compacted structural fill consisting of free-draining, organic-free material with a
maximum size of 4 inches. Should contain no more than 5 percent fines
(described above), compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D-1557-78
maximum density..
-_ Tensar SS-1 geogrid, Mirafi, or equivalent reinforcement approved by
geotechnical engineer. •
OPerforated or slotted drain pipe with 4 inch minimum diameter bedded on and
surrounded by crushed rock filter material, described above.
• ® Designates size of rock required, i.e. 4 man.
•
NOTES
• All fill should be placed in thin lifts not exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness. Each
layer should be compacted to no less than 95 percent of maximium dry density, as
determiried by ASTM D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor).
• With exception of upper layer, geofabric reinforcement should be wrapped around
exposed fill face and lapped back beneath overlying fill layer a distance of at least
2 feet.
• Thickness of crushed filter rock layer, B, should be no less than 18 inches.
• Depth of burial of basal layer of rock, D, should be no less than 18 inches.
• Length of reinforcing geofabric, LR, shall be feet.
• Geofabric reinforcement layer spacing Z, and Z2, shall be and feet,
respectively.
• Height of rockery, H, should not exceed feet.
TYPICAL DETAIL
FILL CONSTRUCTION
ROCKERY MORE THAN 8 FT. HEIGHT.
Proj. No. Drwn. • I Date Checked I Dated I Plate
I
Y
) ) >
1 > •.L'i )
)) Y
Y I
�♦
) J
�10. O
> Y
> > )}� �y> ,/:,x
} ya> ) . J xv.
• y
T' >' r
) x)�
v'
b y=,n > )
> >
) }
)>
Y� } 4
1
)
}
),�YV1
>l
hj �'1 .
>
r ) r
Y )
Y ',Y,
) •♦ e
› ti
k �
>
rs.. .cr > '>))>>>)' .) >'ti.'\�y''\� ♦ >�-.yr >. 0+4
,) ♦ ,') `, ) 2> rya • ) s
Y
>' . , .
...fit iY
B - 4 LR -
•
L0 >•
LEGEND
'..ode:. Crushed rock filter material ranging between 4 and 1'12 inches in size and free of
o:
bs•-0 organics,with less than 5 percent fines(silt and clay size particles passing the
No. 200 mesh sieve).
n Compacted structural fill overbuild.
Compacted structural fill consisting of free-draining, organic-free material with a
maximum size of 4 inches. Should contain no more than 5 percent fines(described
above), compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D-1557-78 maximum density.
OPerforated or slotted drain pipe with 4 inch minimum diameter bedded on and
surrounded by crushed rock filter material, described above.
® Designates size of rock required, i.e.4 man.
NOTES
• All fill should be placed in thin lifts not exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness. Each layer
should be compacted to no less than 95 percent of maximum dry density, as determined by
ASTM D-1557-78(Modified Proctor). ,
• Thickness of crushed filter rock layer, B, should be no less than 18 inches.
• Depth of burial of basal layer of rock, D, should be no less than 18 inches.
. • Height of rockery, H,should not exceed feet.
TYPICAL DETAIL
i
FILL CONSTRUCTION I
ROCKERY 8 FT. AND LESS IN HEIGHT. I
i
I-
Proj. No. Drwn. 1 Date Checked I Dated I Plate 1
•
tailiar_III= ® er`
f----dr
'♦ 'b
s.
1 MY.4::..? IV:"
6 7 ...,,, api.
..
..A
.......,.. 4ir i
Hay. °•:
(� ..4- i
- '-•--ram �°•..a,, •. _ -'♦
! _ ° am
if t II .W . III / ..r ' �.�I, 14 '
,Ti D ` r
_
♦ •
3
—I-1B f -
Fig. A. ROCKERY SECTION Fig. B. ROCKERY ELEVATION
SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
NOTES:
Rockery construction is a craft and depends largely on the The long dimension of the rocks should extend back
skill and experience of the builder. towards the cut or fill fence to provide maximum stability.
A rockery is a protective system which helps retard the Rocks should be placed to avoid continuous joint planes in
weathering and erosion process on an exposed soil face. vertical or lateral directions. Each rock should bear on two
While by its nature(mass, size and shape of the rocks)it or more rocks below it,with good flat-to-flat contact.
will provide some degree of retention, it is not a designed All rockeries over 4 feet in height should be constructed on
or engineered system in the sense a reinforced concrete basis of wall mass, not square footage of face.
retaining wall would be considered designed or engineered.
The degree of retention achieved is dependent on the size Approximate Approximate
of the rock used;that is,the mass or weight, and the height _ Size Weight-lbs. Diameter
of the wall being constructed.The larger the rock,the more 1 Man 50-200 12-18"
competent the rockery should be. 2 Man 200-700 18-28"
Rockeries should be considered maintenance items that 3 Man 700-2000 26-36"
will require periodic inspection and repair.They should be 4 Man 2000-4000 36-48"
- located so that they can be reached by a contractor if 5 Man 4000-6000 48-54"
repairs become necessary. 6 Man 6000-8000 54-50"
Maximum inclination of the slopes above and behind Reference: Local quarry weight study using average weights
rockeries should be 2:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). of no less than six rocks of each man size conducted in
Minimum thickness of rock filter layer B=12 inches. January, 19BB.
Minimum embedment D=12 inches undisturbed native soil LEGEND:
or compacted fill placed in accordance with report Drainage materials to consist of clean
recommendations. • �*" !k ;. angular well-graded quarry spalls,with 4-inch
Maximum rockery height H= feet. '`' . 1e maximum size, or other material approved by
Rockeries greater than 8 feet in height to be installed the geotechnical engineer.
under periodic or full time observation of the geotechnical Surface seal; may consist of impervious soil
engineer. .•.. ...... `:' ''. , or a fine tree draining granular material.
Unless otherwise specified in writing by the rockery Undisturbed firm Native Soil.
"designer," all rocks placed in the lower two-thirds of the wall should be 5 to 6 man rock,4000 lbs. or laroer. Rocks ilmleiam,--:-_-
ttl Drain pipe; 4-inch minimum diameter,
placed above this level should gradually decrease in perforated or slotted rigid plastic ADS pipe
size with increasing wall height using 3 to 5 man rock, 0 laid with a positive gradient to discharge
700 to 6000 lbs. under control well away from the wall.
TYPICAL ROCKERY DETAIL
NATIVE CUT, ANY HEIGHT OVER 4 FT.
•
Proj. No. Drwn. J Date Checked i Date y Plate
DISTRIBUTION
3 Copies Bruce Blume and Associates
1199 Eastlake, Suite 210
Seattle, Washington 98109
Attention: Mr. Jim Garrison
1 Copy Lance Mueller and Associates
130 Lakeside, Suite F
Seattle, Washington 98122
Attention: Mr. Bob Fadden
Earth Consultants, Inc.
O- --" / wort q REST IV•Prr,' 'C (\pe aA ESDALE A O.sW
_ ,.� . • ' E%5T r\ iiER sloEwALK PER fJi JRE L.I.ea Mt.
..i . •. F"/ � ..P.RIaE ArlitII��y REIYATE � ��g q•
- \,.. 6Y/sr POLE So w �50 3-4E
. - P \ - y i m_�wwuu wwwo /� Iy _ ` 4N m%
1�� I y I �I �,- N Y Y ""'•"'"' or I•n..oa� ..w45a e-8-'..�uti--I---� isr. m r
_� -OAKESDALE A✓ENUE S.W.L—Jy e —/��'E %
\,_ ,— ' ¢ S G• �-`- R•xS\ .� R.25 Q.2- �l.V-` 7/,n,, 3'P
'er — _ - •••,...4=-... . _ ;,,��.�. iz: \
nrtr�R.t>amr,^ �-w ' l _ m��. _ •"..r�—� ` �
,,fz '-illp H0.LP-/e• vim. Li _
�. _. i' - -"'"A +j'a� "p ro / 5�, - '-_ -.'^,___ si
IP'
:� Q ..�./ .•:v ,E�q:o �' C:\ o re.n5o \ fAo
^9k0 /f ''..''(q ./.fir. fv7 _tes- ----„u... _.i1i zie GP(s'� s: I•
�" eo+iu�K neEPR PEa��v'.z`o°s I ?_
Sil1 v< ci,/ �%r �,n o .. i, `",.�.•-"" <- "}0n� ^ ;: � m �Ar',AJ,i> LEGEND z
'/i ,^.� BtY _ ♦..MPEI V ti' :I LLSC9PT/ON E31'MEOL F-G�,.pLG'- I Mini
i 7G•.[5.5P i.E.IS50: ,Y f'J' -
{j / 1. in mil Q 1.5.13:10 I�El25 Pj iP ,rye{ i 4 .- FFDP6CIY LINE
/fir► t 0 L A. ——
CH..//AWL, ': pr,••/e c„Pe% t(oG » o...., s /roLP-/o•,.so•. I\ 1
',+p a �"• u O' EX/STCONTO(/R -(�'�� ox
TE.2.T s• •> �„� -
IE.l2/-)9 y ..J q'�-..e .r .H � ..q.... t%... q..i .4 :(,V d•J�` I „ I. I PROPOSED OJN(OUR CI Z
45 ii ' I 55' I 55' I 55' I 55' I I 55' I 55' /S$' ,57' q0�--"P 4H' \ ~, I PROD
�g5 O w
Jn// �(, �lb \
•
I PRDPOS2O SPOT ELEVATION cc J
Y, I- ` /-" ' J�I ZI' PROPOSED G.CONC.CURS =U
' 1 "P / D/RECT/ON OF ORR/NACE —-- lA _
IX/6r ESE OF H7VENENr
mI
w �¢/ IX/5T.Jr(TJR/✓/A A/N
'kilt
(i< _-- yI_ h7' PROPOSED SJORM OR9/N -_ GICE
P R O P O S E o B I L D/N -III I ;� ) ® .a`, PROPOSED/NLET(MPE r)—�\ // • I WPROPOSED/NGET(TYPEII) Q
/ FINISH FLOO Ole: d
o-0 'II P �% / NE4VY PVMT.SECTION
��tt \ / / / \Nl NOR-'/•�dL FVMT SCZnOil i / •i , •1)
I`,\-• j ' [s../O�YPE�543) / I�I 1�
.aN y b/Q. /.sH / 7/' (iY / 4,- s e
1��`` �"` -- `+-� ____ rn • amG oolJNsva.T(m•Imc) l •_= -E i I i
✓ \i` .. �.} RA/N LEADER f / N I .O ;
\ §2'C=t) EEP aril
\� miter
\I.. I =�
� \ .. `' �si�',I,? rv...xP•n:w,Q.7 £s: Wy`.�+ •. Fy■ o •
�`7 Q r t; :.-' C 'D t, :, s 'A ��. ? E-' BELT I OY ]G-K
Vf ( RO,.5A E'.� y�Ili, 1I1
BI OF 1 LTRATI ON aiWALE
`p GAL) {..i. 3OL.P.-18. I - 0 ,. u F
••� C.H..i9(TYPEII-54•J aR C v l...=/. r(Jf��. }!�
TG./bAe 0 ' 6,.. C0/, (K'uTe.HELoy 3 y/ �'!' NNT
t [E If.2o yE�CTYPEll-50•J C E doh _• "� `I
a' N\� CB.0 e(#a-9F) ri 4E.IP°.YD Aeii '8_�■. ,..
. .w0� • i� / e:i o-bray- A.. fj�d —.— ,t7 I I �� m CH.�2(MPEa-aq'J
� % ,•'�• I CH.+I/(TYPE II-4B IYI' I ■ TE.21.00
`\ • i LF..;:.'/d-. "I'D••24r@'--40. 5• G J.'.//,/ m O� -' \2 Q U n
\\ UV,557-5,p• 'a�` I E Q
}� ` �'•'!9�•. Y4',.y 30L.F.-�'• Ji' O/L/WATER SEP-"� RI-TRAP 1.., ( .-.. .. N3
4\ .
b �.^..U17• O. . J FE.9.94 -•I 2
I
(` '.•.‘,.
y ��/�/��f/ ... V.C.ssT- •OIL/ / 1PD LL..4 w/OE �a� /�� ! qrC , I O Z Z
\ \�t,` ! WATER 57- -•TOR Q /a p ICE
VICINITY MAP ��: ! a t Pen?' ( �oy Pa6.04,05 au o�sNUGe ` j i I I .e e a r.
Z it. 3
` 4 , ' n RIP-RAP X W`ETIANns .AiI �� _ .1 I uumniiOtt
�".6,` ••.yt� //fi �` b l 1I e./ab o♦ • / 1 ' ' n
-31 .\ 16,„-t- i `\ , A>1x L.`� ?LV I/E Bc'fYOM OL 54/dLE EL a9 \c...,.. .....'
�. �/.. I rta G5L9Y ..'� �1((�� �. IN r`'��lG j'�'TJ�� AI7�F.1\Yy, �` ���{{{ 'I, RUNEo ,� ,} �ii'tl yl , 8=AP , "�L —,,,, .., 1 ' t \I\ � , /' a� \ �.9 � 1 I �. •<aEGT IOw Y-Y l� * 2
�i � `151T.� a A 111 \ a. •• eoi.omOL•s0.4LE da / / J / - -- • // • I_• u
DOE --:- . ■r \\‘‘� E..9.6 /� I Yr
J�� \ E(CEOP ly �,e •— 7� �' '' O.LM. K.MR.
.1,_� \ \,1��WEFLM'OS 3 / \ —_-- P�<�f...:nc, ... :..
�i ,, 3 PFPRof.LIMIT OG MI0RK L111E 2-'[0-90 /•�90'•3-21-90
C') -�C.I' ` \\�✓ .lo,-e:.w weK 6�I�ROAGur1EJ,- '' foaAs�.W.lo''sRiwi.i w a �— I I CALL 48 HOURS
31\ a WEo I.IITJIw DK.bJA�PJ U6'.LAJps PLJW IS ARTOF ybRIL LIMIT. )
' i x (SE6 SweGLIARbE RAN LOR LINnS) % / BEFORE YOU DIG �89246.04
1 1.800.424.5555 c-2 c
•
ti/ / ,
''',-?-7,6:4-7:-,•. ::=.,
f /' er gl:AtZairv4kli,A 1 1
r, 8
i
2A i
4, 2
,. 1.,...
„..-,,,,..r,GROLJN9
-...„
J
(I Li)
1
r \CD
tl..:1 A.57r.-.] _ ;-1-:.. -,7:-,,,'.--
- .
.0 k'SkW 5,§si 1 /A
R.;
. ,.... 4
.-t-
.•/ -,,, il_____J- -4, , - . • , . 11 ' , .:
.....-- i"21.0.2". 88O •• - - '•r.:..
"er..,5;-^ ./.. .__. ••',5e,,,,
410'
,,,::.,;•: - •i 4- ':(-l'i ,-,-,--1 • :C.)
- -•,:. ___
-,- I ! I .17.-• -\'' ,:,-- ',,,,.
1. 4 1 "•:•-1 • ____.
i - •
fil.!, I I i . \• LEASE.4.1.,.
-
. .
if -*--',-,'-'3,,
;.,_.). ,.. 1 ...-.•:- ,-..
( I r---------.-.,.„.,_____ •-••• :...r.„ ''"---) .7
41‘. ,.\\ , ::::.i.,
,, ,''' '•'''('' "/ •
. .,
1-1 1 • 1
. • . , ,
--, / •
' \ \'at; /
/ A.,„ //".. ';. /
. • .
,.;
( 1 , , . ,,- ,
I Lirr711- - ----1 ' ; • ' '' '---' >>•I \ „
.. • •
•\ \ /
/
' a 5 ' '••//.• ./ „
.. ..,
I i I . \ ''',... .,'.. • ! \; /:' '‘.. \ C ',' , .I ! I••,•-'-',,-----.--- `• \• ••-•:----, ,•:•.., , ,_-_, _21-f._\.„_.., ,.,.. 191,... "on i> \:, , .._ , , / / 77''
Q 1 .,.. . I';.555.,.... ‘ ''.::. '...'‘.' , ',(1' I ov., o... ,";\' '\>, • ', \'','..11 , /
,, \ • /
1 , ' -- -.;) Zt."1;;•''-`;''-• , ‘ . ‘'';'',,.":1,‘• ir- '\ .,.,, ________/„„t..,- - , .„---/ -1.- :...:trn.,r-.i,.-1-.1.•grz..1.:,11--•-•'''''''''"
\,,"\..„.,N • i \ .'>. 12:_,Th........--..-.-.......' • t. /".. , ..,' eno•n:r'enh 0.03 : ...i.'1.21%‘..Ji.,..=....b.....
•
../ Section 12 and .In said township sod range, It-
Z1 '' I 13-. S.Y.2,...'..... `,.,`,.i.,,..•[•' •
. • E< -As.•••• ./\ /' _....,-/-- , ,
, Aiql...... ri.....J.:--->,.../>-,- , ,_..,,, ,_..._ ri.
V. ,,.ft...,..0......;
- ''' • 14.8, )... .t .I 7/ir ..---' / / / „ „, , •rtharr,Pacific Bolt U.right-of-we.
Mance northweaterly sod northerly aiong said right-of-way and
aye.U..•aaterly boundary of land convoyed to ChIcepo•nilwaulae• a',,- ,
F 11.1 6
'., IN,‹• ,
g,.%,.,,,(--"'s`----7'.::,"'.
/Vt.,/-'-'"-.''' ,,,,. , and se.p..1 Railway Company(nom Chicago.Mlle*,St.Paul ond
Pocific Railroad Cowpony,for its[soloed vys line.2475.00 feet.
morm or leo,to the south In.of Black River in Section 13,said
townahlp•nd rangO1 el .
,, , ,,, . ,- ...„..- 4, oouthuomterly margin of said County Road No.0,
them.oouthesaterly,along the meutherly margin of said road.
Z td
I . .
„...1, ,,,J .44 i .„....i ,,G, 1450.00 foot.mato or les,to the trim point of beginning,
$ .0- agl-GG A' t. / 7_,7_----,,,-..."7.;* ..' - ' '...' ,, ,...." ./),, •1! 1 , .„,,,,...,
ISSINO•1,45 that portion of Covarneent iota i.5 and 6.Soot..24. q
/ ' and M.north..guortor of..northwoet quarter of aald Section 7 ,.
•••,,,.•..•••,-..... -., • ---, . , /---• '2 ,--,, •,.. '.;.-':// ' /',./Y = ,____,..-- ,•••4
24.and Government Lots 5 a.6.In section 13 and of the bed of H
L''''''• \s,--- 1 ,' 5_ / ,
--- I ---, \•//r/ \ ,/,' ----". --0' lalcs ohovn on Government plat.all in Township 23 North.Range•
goat,M.M.In el,County.Washlogtoo.iYing botwoon Count,Rood D
/(?, i 'i ,.,.. • •••' ,' '
'1' - .-.V7"1'•.,:l ." --'\,,,/\A„,,/,' .?,2"7 /23 .4,---_, -,-,' No.8 and the might-of-way of NorMarn Pacific R-----y company and
Chicago,Milwaukee um st...Rai.,co6Pany),
8f:Ter:r:rs.2:70Lall:aient:'attl'Ztv:nnrerte‘hr: El al -
/4
_ ,
•
.,- ,,,,, "<-. 49 thence eouth 2°30.34.west.916.42 feet to the point of beginning,
'ill I I,.....r,. thane.south 52,12'00.east.445 foot.note or lege.to tho westerly' ,RATmnem.M......1,'''''-'. O•.......--- . ev . margin of Roost..goad.
- . I .,....;:,0(.3./ t ea 0,,,,,,,,
.----•'..( *...- ,..04. ---- ,r,„,
---'1,P''-"...-. ''''''" 1. e'd w.....along said weaterly margin south 16•34.04.-----21.37 feat
thence mouth-----rii.1...ch..r.of said nerve concave to th.
.! e oPs7
/ ii.;:\ 1 • • .
...„ t. ......5., ......",-ovv
•
‘, ,,,,, ,
Mance moat/masterly along the six of said cu,ve concovo Pa Me.
I.1! .„..,:‘,...... .
....,.......'" ......„........".--- ..-- '10' . '0' •outh-----41.01 foot;
' •
1...„. ..............."..--1,...---''
'48•='.4.11...7.I, thencs north.tr r rr ea...229.70 feet to the point of bogioning:
•=.f,IT,11„ortz.....:1°.::trl.ztl7g,,,M,147%,:ult •T.:Zrtri.•;"6717.:-.1E-11:7.::::i - ''''''M".'''' demoribed ao follows. fi.........., ._.__.........................r...S•4....- a,,,,...0,
J°6 ".:...•:;..":."."V...7==...••""'"""' Comeanoing at the mouth...It coiner of maid Section 12. DI ;
',..
‘....••pertA 29°51.vela,114.7 foots
RP' I.so.hcaor r•o. s.1: `:=L:=;:t.'4Z.?."'"''''.""-" than°.north 66°21'nest.153.9•1••ti
••••••...... ...,
utenc•sou.64•57.-----to a fol..on Me a...fly margin of tho
. ''...:',;:a.,••-•••-•-•-•,...-.. - pf.,/,otamt ere '
"'" Chicago.Milwaukee.St.Paul arci Pscific Railroad Company CD .
5,--.1.15.4.ca, 114 rleozni
and the ten.point al beginninin
:12 i
\A CI r -- -- ,,e-r-rt-&,0^le•iss ':r.7.;'..'"It"...".'"-`""''""'"'-
Ail: .11.•,..F..,5,4 2...L/.I.dare, ..„..,.n,...„,......,„.., .......„. a.rei,ree..t.sew.ea ewe.tame.'al wile to thenco northesaterly along maid-----rly margin of the ocage.
Milwaukee.St.Paul and Pacific Railroad Company ihtf-way.
200 feet.wore or leoo.to•point co Me acmemrly eargin of 7 L Lo.c i
1• ittith- - ir , . ,..,fre/O.-5.15,1,15 o.F.
5.zo...11r4O,-MP 7..t..7.t."..tn...r,==,7••••••••‘•"•".. Tract 33.Renton Shorolands god Supplement.records of Xing County. a aliE t
.................-........ ...„. -,,,-,11-7„,,,..„-_,1,,,---:;... ,7-7;z1.--- --....,
.4 s...,..ze, , . 4: gonoe.LO515••9 ::::::.",=."*"•"•"".•" •ttr........V.M11=7;::::.V.n•"""-• ..tr.':.,. liot:g....12;"TV.1!;:i=f,Lleteir's';.t.n....
itlitir P: 'f . s.er-c./MOispoorp.03‘31154
t::::%:::11.!:aterly along maid wootorly margin of county Rood . L 3.8 1
__Mo,8:104 foot.more or lona.to•point.whIch boar.north
: IR'' ',,,,'.'1.1•11j.-i isilk::.:1 , S I T E MA1,1 l Mg:ffg;r:-Inst .r--...-...---n.A.r.--a-r_--...z--- E o ;
•:tt.t.=..•."...tt',...trf...=.:::Vi.72: . ,517.......-.5..5.5...
,11
-411‘7-A2-tc:.Tejrrots.11. • ,.......................... - C 0
the,oenier.of which ern.north 25°21.49.ea•t.an km*diotance.oi
50.74 feet; .
tif.Z1.'4'*°1-1.56.g.5. ..'........t.7.,.troL"Tr.1:::.n.T.V.'''''''...‘.. ':aere..Z.....'ler...a47.17:71,7.:=•m=m.:1
Menem•long•c.r.to the rill.having•rad..of 467.26 feet the
754.%iggShini!ria,. Al
Nile....St.,.L...Po......rood Coo..right-of-wol,
.4‘..08,RoPd. Fl.o.5!AO,•GO.
..=."7 t:r..crin-=---------17:iiim:::;7"'"r"'.
Imr•••••ir
.T 1
/.
/ PLANT LEGEND
SYMBOL BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME OTT SIZE REMARKS 5'
..,
. I
• -
LIQUIDAMBAESTYIZALIFLAIV5\45Er(*PI 56 Ir 5112Alt.,1011ZUNK,FAILL.HEN.:71
® PIN U5 IVIAIZA/M151K IAN PINS Is 5,.6. RILL 4 SWAY
. 1 •I't t
-
• CI.
I _ e AGER ..IKON/eLIM/VINE.MAPLE - -.,. MuLTI-TRUNK
e "UNIFERUZ(....,01ZU1.45A7HOLLYWCOB 17 24.3e mail-%E.N . i
E2
/.0KNOS•A'OLONIFE.r.P/W5 C.C4WCON 'N r3CAt- FILL 4 Risi.ly
• 1 r2
Xi
< EXISTING STORAGE 0 ;.10Loto.,c.US blhLDLOK/OLEAN SPRAY I 31 1 3L,AL PULL 59,15HY • 4. 1. 4
I EXISTING BUILDING = C.0.1,1L1HE.RIA SHALLOIV 5A1....0.1„, I I 14;rAL, ,'0.6.
EZZ221 PYPERILUM Lie.e..iNIIVIST.JOHNWOR'r! 4' 9'O.L.
--
Irki ,ll.LI1L.!!1!1!i iilL1.1 ; ,LL.';' S:
le
".. _. ___ e
, 5 3e...., PSL.0 DLY—Ili
IIIiIiiii;Hii.; i rt..0 .31 wHd,..,,',/,,E0:17:g..t::Eu.X:1 9171:LE 0,,E.AT 1,1 ON
,_ ii •
--- " ---
,‘, _,
• Ot . gp.ii.v..., NOTE -NI M.5.:5 WA 'IS FROM KEN1GN 5ANL,A.L,KAVEL.,OR WM0,1E1,5401.
•U',. _.: a - 7-- C'1...".-7- (:::- .;fr .:--5.=..= ''' 4 D
• Igly_ . .t.t.. -•
,.. • ,,,., ..a
tk il.,
HALF COURT BASKETBALL —.- kv /.., .,.. ull!if
, ....,
h.
..V.....................7 •
1, f
11.1 :.,..1, BUILDING B .1
-I r 0:1•-12"TREES.,....^..,_. -I / i „...-'
a• '.t , r
.•--- 'o,
0 6 /
. .. .,
I
//• ,..."........--.."-......."'a
I ,
,'''
\0
IC r•n.PO I. f---- mff
24'BERM , rla-e-
.--V-.........''''...... 4
).. •
, CC
,, .
CD , / WETLANDS TO REMAIN
BUILDING A 'C. WETLANDS TO REMAIN-, 0
. ....
0
°I'-• •.: . ,/(5.0-' ..•-,
/ : '....... . ••'Illyz,i-)••''• il 01 .. ‘ , ‘
111
j )
/
=. >
- SAVE EXISTIN. TREES 4 .
"...... Z
...,-)., ....,., ...>.....„...„,.......-- -
;
,.... C ' III6 I—
__ __-
t .()PINIC AREA..._,-.. 0 rr
i.(.1)67 n .....„.....
.60C° 1 1
'
.5 eWili 0.1...........ea , •00, .1,4.1.1.1.WA 1.11.54.14 <
1
..-.1 ,.__0_._-,..-.. .....®-CL. ....,,........
mut.1.452 5.....•ra•moir mu..45 4,.....4, 0 II
PF/51 le III
WINO V.IF 1 I A I WM., Z
1=ItR,TZ%r1.1 , 11P9
A.I.SW!.crKitorN•Ar new
,.,,,, 1.1.1.EVII,11441,...wc5 Z i
h
I..5.410 ew AI IT 44.0.41.1 <
_,
9
e ,...,..,........ • !I. _--,..,
,............q,...... :1,,.. ..,c., ,
I5.)/555T.555/.nro A 1;7:ingieij...;', ,;,',... < E 1
..". 'I '',14., ..,......,...D. •
Zr.4%.,.=Tr..." 0
SCALE 1.:40'-0.
12 pi i
.4.: -t ua
...
Mo.
.A TREE/9111.113 El. TREE/STAKING C TYPICAL GROUNDCOVER SPACING
IN OED AREAS . NTE IN LAWN AREA. NM L-1
WS
il
DESCRIPTION
4 d i UM toe m mE Rlmrzal mAIm..0 m
n n No m,FY.:4 ELT V.v. u NM CO en vawaTON uv Tm
±? Exlzrri 66a• a�Es. smrmTiT mum es�mvvmaa for aAI� m 1�,Twrs�e x>rYoem0043 tor 1,IN aml�002=='•
AS
n1 �a
GoN
N N � COMmICIs AT THE x4,m NORTH
COWER aem09 SECTIONS ur.®x n SAID 32403211. NC
II N j in(� !% p•ly oe Ye2umu0 M To ei]226:489 WEST,ALTAIG THE T.VES OOVO STILL NORTH N.IRO Or O.en,an�r a$E Go
0 6.t•.�.eE 6ie\9/ 2, O w.o _ y x•xi•x•e.sr.ALONGAND 9ssxWOVaLLr wae,MARGINe,x.SILL
n� Cc oxx•L[HALM
$YYYJJJ m i
.• 6q�.s z b co.LI'Oz:" E ° S ZT• n9.14 C��6iRu0 m0lO OI•N�SI.6E.n,INS aYOOinsELLi65wcu,Eason600 V
Y� Tag
y ti zd-o 9% �� �' a• '•a••r•o�,b 1) J/ 2� zz2•Tcz r¢s: SOme 88as'm•OUTH •03 VEST x 636.33 9,.6I ru[ x®sovnselai NM
]
.sr ° • O1Os.381 313.6 r¢i;MACE NOM 1•Ix•60•2WWar 6x.90 MT TO TROT MINT Or
;� 1 = 1,121.,E THENCE amm ea m•m•.9aT xa,.D ..nTamm amR
ii o1'oE:�'31•E `� �• QD'` O.i5 u8[a TEE E S.233 imam or TES m
�� a4 v MO TACITIC ec a COMM IIS.],si M-vs Tung m e Cm9R•n 28•11:3329rsr U $
``` COuL. '6• SAID Ells,MT AND Yogic SAID E6xeI.T McCIN 57.49 FM,lawn m ax9 ? ;
10�•0 x°EPSEMEUT Tn \\`� e,0. VEST MSG SLID E.smuT wau IM.01 M To
T;
MT 19 MMHG i.98 FE.AND ALONG a..m'E"'E'cea"uo m eovrc'c fA O
Iy n°"6 3�O e0O �\ Hqr
3 P^ v t K vE w.rc 6's]m'e 140 TIGHT RATING•RADIOS Ores,6•ma[usa9ii.aw SAID GURU loz.ea MT; (j>
TOv m ° uE. THENCE NORTH 60Y1•02•EmT 60.63 MT;Txtlm YORm]6•I,O 9•EAST 47.6O FU
1 ICI A —��b O h TO A POINT ON TES YD TOM SEIs OSa'cmrc w91a•RADIUS OF V236.17929.00 LAST:THENCE 99.99*8,THE 401EN.ROAD .0roln F E MD
Or MU mks me SAID T.TAR POI.OF 11.112300;
.53 A. TO A POINT
.1vN� 6,0��5 �\ M� 0\1 1 1 / Al!,19 n...... Iz O 323-414. ? $3g
i
'.`]'. \5 L `6=_\ -% amrzED To: nuceSTUART TITse 4 CoNTANT
Cmr.Yr or xemu c. - m R
"MS IS To
1 \
VEILS 2303 IN
•v I 6 ``\ \ ______,•� `\I\\��— [v �1 I�/ .D1i2.Ire rt� `Y ru1.E]'rxeee0r. AS DEFIiLDRraam MD ~JxL M'r Gli
W a wfs 6.xD9)De�a. c
f 1 IAM rwDTlm. vs ma 233. 4me
C I I \p ��i 1 �[O 7-\,
���N erreessm OR m
G
•
1.
o \1 r wE LA 05 7.,,e $
\ 9:1.-----o-Pr
ngri I a.
s c.- o`� \I �/ i a'° _uor<Iw1x 1_v..rul-1
��'; Je' s I
\ \ ' n /e�y 1° tea... ., eoo- • e CCbE� . .I . .2
ti /i b' ar 1
�... \•.l� Ed�Vx I \ -F'D �� / '' vo4 Ve¢,r1ca... .A IQ
z a ' \ o� • f' w�l o u e c '' .;EMI:cg]m`
• �� �E a,.1.--06E
. 5 V
Lprn`°X> PAR ON I-nGli*F 00Gls E1._E•n a n.z.z>
v' v I C 1 x0'Srw1TAL,8Ew arws Ex+/\Y" �II`�i Q•6• D� 13
zac 1;0 I \ CC\\ 8605020860 %'" L A.2E,6.= 450,002 Sa.F.10.33Ae.2 'S A
J II"b\ ` ' \\\lam /-�' °Pa•;�i� If000 2s
•
cw-nor-r �,,.p 4'i \y 1 yp / //��-7��y� �e a;1 �77 JJ'65 aril
y \6"✓\ / ��E. 2.0. •v/ 26' L=6>.ay 6L UV
Chieayo, M _6Z— Lb bAN
I .I'-5d es-lo,w
I"-50
•
.99 ZI9.01
C-IA- 8
'.ILLN Id..Fleet" -I..pi � > '�~` . �„�
ZeZT
lwoY
O LEGENDT�♦ sac. 11A 4e do
0 1;� \.1�`" ... DESCRIPTION 9YM00. +\. RY \ �?•'± 11pO....,, O-,
I .�y� . _�, 41_G- O L ' - _--_ .,`.., �. i� PROPERTY LINE —.._ '4. ./.� e k. 1 % ,, *T'
YI 40- " ,.C� ,e,_ y i '� ' /¢2 LOT LINE r.': i1K `��'. \'."'''';"-'
fl M_7_ •. ••-•1
' _ � r W `\ r PROPOSED DUILDINCl UNE ) tt�ti,'• (.'� - "-'SIT.)=
1='AlaJ— •
'w.. �+_ \ \,j o EXIST:CONTOUR /16__� ,C i�Fl., I 1. (.5 g
Z
011O _ s / - ,i\'P2, iu G.. G_ / PROPOSED CONTOUR —� IIl.1 , � . r w
\ 1DND {a ♦ RBNOVE � / .,l R1DCPe LINE .: y� a.... �...o WO
k
/ r (I v �1'.,,.a
.� Ih ••2 /SI, // O'p1 \� / O \ err EXIST.SPOT ELEVATION (uL 31 I
I I • 6�T a c. L6.�E N o \ ,.. _ L7¢
\r •�—�—\ 7•-M / O \ OI SEE \`\Y NE PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 2 P ' �, ^14� `:3,21 i. `z
6b/ IF) • !�' �'�_ eao \ DETAIL) \� ROW LINE ELEVATION \y �� '� /�: .✓,n I _ — \P l- ti \ •RI_ P �4 ROCK DVJI / _ ..�e'''�y .,x I • O
/ J / J 1 /�. 4—_^\s�a� `. sy �`` \ 2 ,e Ps DIVERSION DITCH i �`'4A ,L.Y�:.:.: !� H g
\ -,, ^'` II A'I SILT FENCE ,-.---�.- VIGINI•fY M44P =OC FI
' 1 .0. �.� PROP"O 13UILOIN5 ND" ,\B P\ \9�\ rn
\,I ��� \ N 2:1 SLOPE UNLESS OIIHOVISE = r=zaoo• otJ¢
1 o RCHA LFV.25.0 \\ ( /»reD) Q w
�/ SEE ARGN/TECT
_A \ JO?, ' 1, PSE N nFa♦ricrAfr \,.\.
y' REINFORCED PILL I 0 LI
IIF . r4 \pMENnOMS al EXIST.RAILROAD TRACTS I I I- 0 w
CC
� NAG,. \�i _MO � J
I{I -� �.` I \ \
).--
I — / N- I d POND r•J y U
•J
�\I`'• r� y'� \ I \ fl r ?'r;�� SEE DeraL sltt.¢
EU
103
co 1
\ y
p li I\ o� \ `\o' \ REINEOKEV Fill., o F siti
^E
I ' ,/ \ I•� _ I,t,'7: ' FOR DETAILS' � ,yI D V 1! WUTLue. sire es ven w mxx r:refl vnue +e
-j, \ �',-\ SNCa PTN1N LI 1{'y OF WE LANDS � /I. eal ROOSTER ROAD svoruven0� j 9
I IZ \ $TI. SALT FWrP[:{E6 p6T.� OMR A ADDRESS. DUCT BUM AND CORM.
1.6 NORM CANAL
,SINTE
lijA:11)
rl\ I ' ;1'(' \`I ~C• O /// etAp RReeAREvOx Sno.re Hwdwtsa�5 me[flrx mev0flPa•
\ \ v°� \ r uS qq rlO \ I \ iiild.r; I. PRPq SE1J \I 'Arm of \ P3 /LO/NC7 •• \`� ��:�LL\ W / r/ \\ /� ' sas 3
71`°-Z
uoz-,zo«rL«.L-D.«.ruH
to
11,
•: 14e°$ SUILCA3.p�er maws 7E ELEV. B �__ z_r r a �`� j / bb
'A �a'J6 y�\ \ P��R oND aME sroAsl �\•r.,•"b e. ��- �y.{ �% B�ENGb ARCB... N ue. of C4
d ,f'' 3 O.•.ICE60pA.R�.�d\ o....ysc.w�e A•,E. d_y
. `�,•'7°• ` \ '/ 1 ''1/ 1.V./. N=0�0E�0�'ON'ECbEe
J V 6 L - e 82.C•I4S
\ 9 A 1.\\ I I IR, { POND I �I 1�yI \' .. V L- ,1 o
or
�x N\. I \ \7: ? \ J r • Pa�y'A MATS,'w v v 12.......1,M oRIA0,"�.D o 1- ¢z
J 3:1 �, OF eJ¢B.✓r NOR AILIPt6.T.1.x Go¢N.vz W e~g
IA' 1 a' \ J r\ \ - O / /• OF GO,+Ga6TE,BPVWE QrF�2-iN_e%..•,.K Z
�Iy�1 e P.�..s=r oN w,o., M.A.E+--e.. 3z. r. J_ y
I,C \I• �• 4/II 7\ / \ C \INI \N i 0 � L.ci.ss LINE 1 U M Q
IC 6 IIJ I\ / LSIT.2 \ \Y n ,4.2E/--=600.4r14 CQ.F.O¢ 15.8067..l2F/. W
f
. \ ;1 •
,;", �\ ,1 I\ / s °'\} �% ,,:e::/ '` SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION EARTHWORK 5 2 y L'
I \ I /.WS(LIMITS OF GSARINC. SUSSRADE OLKEIOE BUILOINO.4fi+ O F- W
(Yf .../.''
[11-r-� 60 G.Y. 'A o
I \\ N\ v n•ee�� 21NSTAI.L SILT FENCED. ILL L'J,000 G.+' p < m
y` 31NSTALL TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION EUIwIUG 6LIMGC4[aEl W j .W
` \ \� V //t *'''� L=67.49 ENTRANCE. F,w+75,310 G.Y. �by DO C.!6LDv."A, 14.•210 CI!P}tT'ETD G
E4ILCIN6 7u¢G4A.2GC1 // Z¢
\ I t/R 4DITCHE L7 OPP�5RE pRA1WIfjE DIVERSION < V)O 4>
. I Q: N� DITCHES M.FILL-.42,31.o c.Y�3'i,o5a 4Y OLDr;:'A,a,200 cY.CL[R6:'� (n W F
I y\•. —- j� TsrR{1CTSEOIMENT PONDS W�trIreRATED QuP++T, t,.--fitri ^Iue 1 Ebr1✓wrB F fA ° Q.4 O
\ �.I' aI �/� $lR dTLE15 AND DIVER:ION ITCNIS. ,,Ia BE uS o p51wl 6u O¢a�'�APIMAats O¢LL
p \
y P� 6RLL ANO CaPADE SITE TO SUIGRADE ELEVATION. 2
.0 —�. y- ew Vfmt Ne6 nTm 7.'..eeeEC Te
• 7SEED DISTURDE0 AREAS. I aJlw sznol aPu Fez cAPCr Ls�PT,o.Ic
_6-Z— on qOr,
NOM OINTMccOIL TO SO..A OLSCNPTION OP SAPLING O O "^' •-^
u0 e\mRs OP r®a OPERATION TO 3-„.70
ROOM
M TOR APPROVAL O PRIOR TO mATION T wHE een OP I - ',' / I'.3d
/ A0-449
PLANT LEGEND :<
�SYMBOL BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME • OTT SIYE REMARKS b y t
{6
0 LI(VUR:AMMAR STTKKIFLU//SWEEi/-NM 3(. Pr SiRA14Hi1KuNK.FULi.IWU* ''It t
Q PIW NY - i a
j O AMR.DIRONATUM/VINE.MAPLE i2 5-4' MULTI-TRUNK m i
p =uNI PERUS L•'4OI UUOSA%HOLLYWOOD IT 2•••%° MULTI-STEM
LOKNuA:1oLONIFEr4'KEDTWy DO4W 9 1,3E5L PILL 4 EDSNY OSS y. s�1 wyy
( -EXISTING STORAGE p IIOLOn15/..Us DIULOLof(/GLEAN SPRAY 31 j 34AL. PULL 4 BUSHY :p• "E -'d
EXISTING BUILDING i (TAUUHERIA SHALL ON/SALAL 1161AL 3'O.L.
I -- ® 1-yPERILUM LALLINIUI/NT.MHNWORT" Y- 3'O.Z.
[r'_-3 HYDROSEED EXIUTIN4 YE4ETA11ON •
I
'VI
l:Li1111:it I., I WHERE D151LIRi'/ED Illllt
I,'''..•I 5OD
�L _I I I• 1 �` __
-_-_ 3. _• 0 I T,.ENV-AGuiW)U I/A RI4N+'E 9 44A1. FULLL S$IIR I
q� . llaI LL...I;I .I.il l�i I. .. i _••__
• , , ..,
��! ,' `. b] to-OL -U. el ...• - 1 _ - �. 71 NOTE 7OII.Mlx:5 WA, `ut PRDM A'rNfGN 5AND 44kAYEL,OR AFPROWD E rUAL
,I I: .
_ tNI ; \' ' Egg
i� rc •
- �� 'if
��` " HALF COURT BASKETBALL 1 .�-y ;� t."
`.. _ _J l`'•`,- ••o•''J\ A di
> Q' 7_� 1 I
J I>t D'-I2'TREES.� BUILDING B ,I /
y 1 /
O •
i Z
O• I.). 2.'BERM O `'sin) �F}-c.: _ Q
i CC 1. WETLANDS TO REMAIN O
BUILDING A 1P` ` WETLANDS TO REMAIN-v CL
'fib i1/
la
• - BATE EXISTIN• TREES - '// F Z
/ - Z •Z
',GPICNIC AREA Cr
.IT PN\LPOAO
•J EpN
. - NDPt� pIp
JPJNGTD� Z A
:.M 1.L urwl. Q
e N*1 L..V1.4 8
� ,/ ..hi
!` WW-{{,// wr:L ow*Mows J
,� n ©_� `� MAW wW.OV.X.N•.n. . \,� MAW.vwAeq.eL.o. a i
. - ''-T'-� 1 L aiM A> ear 111iA
/ .Row.. R90 i.4 `". Z
MI Nps�/�u�R E �w Xugp(
!I ez,Asi,r� .RgNxT pill 'NL1PI1 ..HFN..f.m1
US I
Ce r ,1: 0.
, m=j"'..i w•,` . r*1 r.Llrw pw:� ►n.'wh ennowai fA
I '.. p
SCALE I•so'-o' aGrr L i
..m 1.r : r•" ww Z p
VZ r Rw ', Co
...A KING B. TREE/STAKING c TYPICAL GROUNDCOVER SPACING
IN RED AREAS M. 1N LAWN AREAS MT.
We L-1
.!,
TOF/ -4' 4' cnt3N -rst\ tib; —I (f.
I .---- M
E
_ - - — - NNIvniNo) ------ '0
ON - 6' 02 E. IsI 4 0 02 0 0 ‘ i
i
, r, 33
...------
>
.._ a. -.---•,-. 74 7 . ; . 3:/ E°.?
,
_--- . -.:-`,;• -4 •• ry 1
.' ,
0,
. ,. M 5,C. ••• 'r:61 1.'''''..'
/
,
—I ,r z 14 il.
rIi 0.
0 4 4,
' Z,
,,. ..., .-I
..---
,..-
0 k . .• ?A. Zr°
• ,a•
• Z :MN c'rR
I , 13 l'
r 0 ii
/ . .
1 Z
r .
1 !7,
0 • _1
co 1 M (v- (-•
:
i ,
i ..1. .
17 I I 41_
0.11 '
-a 5
\ 0 •
.o.
\ i !" t.), o I
's c"
p‘ 6\ 0 E
• P
5. ( Ill I1 , __5 '
D.
1 L..eirrTere
I, i>
P
' \ P
' a
ES -
. .,
0 i .
r
lil..\
CS
VIZ qU r a I • E.
C. I
re 0
•t 1 , !...P, 4,J
13 A
_ .
\ ,.....„
iiIiii
1 • F ..1
10 1 c
, 4
..,_...
., .o, 0
., ai_ -.„ ,• $ 4.
, ,••
IS —r
' -----_
, ---•••,,.,
• n: ''. ::f,',;.!1•ii6,i W•
•, ,, ..(•.: - ...o to:,
4 Z ttE1 L 1ii tli
;I
-'-.:1 •F Ts iN- —co I('‘i 1\li C'o '6' ;"
080 ;00
•2 2 t: =
• • ,
A , 41 q551gri E 511 fq1i:2E24 11E1 11144 W 211111 EE 14 12 1 g gti ..1
4 5'i I;!..R 42:4 gi -R E1 5 2i 5-, i..IE IN 51 i 11 0 i al 2 1
1 7 r -'-1-
.1, ° g _ , -_ g_1,_r:,_ I g 6i!lgRI Pi III .6 U' 2g .16 !I ° 6 1:6 ii I 2
j:_.:40:51 il. i.PFlq. 9 . 's .5 ' g '§§ g li g i .
, c, 0 p.-6 I _._ 1• , ,, --c ck E 1:?4?..la gi V;a°,i,10 11 1 g,i4 is 50 1;„ i ;E.12.„ 14
..,
4 P. tig"E Pi E!1;g1;.61 1 ;IN il E4;12. E ; h i=
_ a ,-,. ,,,,., , r, IT/t;1 E _,_
p I 4, '! -, ...,t .,clig .i: _,,,.„.0 E Si f,..In;gg. 1r E1 5 . V lig .°Ii3 s•1 2 al 13 R.
g F:n i'4 1 Eg g5 0 1RR .1 .'' ' . ° o ..„E
.4 . 6.. ,i1. :,4-,- E el °E' " 1E ;1'22 a2
c`r tl.' - ,I- iig- i.•_ 5. ;-, -
"ts 0
[, to;4• 5.ila 52
s ai
5
5 g
I ....„7. c...: -°' '.'•c?•,-.1. ; otE1' g ;a. 24 PE - i l'1.,-; ! g 7 ;• ; 2- g;
7: f .IMI
> sr2'E , i; 1; I; r - al Eg5 a i! E. 1511. 4 pl
`,'. .1?4 L ai T..3 1.,. 2 .1501
% .
Cr ‘
:A' i! i: ki, -:,I: (.—„,....„,1AL•ff I • i'; Eta 4. h 05/11 le i 0.E.!En 15 In 5 5 ;a ii
,....•
I t wg I SURCHARGE AND EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN
q) el • ' ,,,,ealar.,
N _o -0- `.1'
N (. DISTRIBUTION FACILITY /11;k: BUSH,ROED&HITCHINGS,INC.
re..%. CIVIL ENGINEERS&LAND SURVEYORS ' SEAL '
la i OAKESDALE AVE.S.W.a MONSTER RD. .0011.Mm
SOOS MINOS AVE EAST
NI b P 2 RENTON. WASHINGTON SEATTLE,WA 9E1102 ‘1,t:..,o.
L.4 / FOR BRUCE BLUMEBRH 12061 323-11,1,1
....... cr.,
k.
c� bdo
ti @ D rr04
I
A
r, 1‘ el-
_ o s
in
/ '
L.
fli
Z./ m .> i q i
o
./.. 6 _. m
-4‘) M01-45TSFZ 1ROAD S.W.
•tr q11 �O • .
me I
DISTRIBUTION FAGIt-ITY Fold • Job no.
7 lance mueller PIS UC,E_ LU Mf✓ Cc drawn
e & associates
b0 hi arctects aia Re N N TO , v�/r°�H I NGTohI checked
130 lakeside• le we.h.9E1122.206 325 2663
date no. revision date
0ID TO III m °r
3
o N P s m o N G, � o r"- --m p
-- t_ r: •
�..�.' k°
6.
/ m�m m ;v :
// gn —I n oa on
i ip m :;; ,
z ) aR Z o$ 40
4
^ z 14.
a R�
1Zl I G We or«
r m
i 0
1 m
2 1 —1 °0 d I
i 6 a gII L
i €' II
P
o y \\ 0 66LJ
IT
pp o ry P P
j X C P -
in I1 U E
P It1 P L C
C.ji P p
5 P
I: ;aL D �
Wawa
D. I m o
F - M -
DI 0/ P o 11 ¢c'lii. O
gi
-\ fF E'
V F Q ���� o
8 �1[ o Ili
It
1
G i's
b 1
�A.
m r -r - '1
�'L+ __ r
4 m meA.B iq ppozp
/ -,_ N N N N N u i n Dig o hi IN,
O N , S "Co G N A S` m Z1. i� iFe A
l5 �_
- `� _-
o N -4 s cD o N 4 s 0) 0
$ S'Sc $ aS0g6 HH Ni2 IH Sa _ ey 5
rr
• u irilie 0 I�:a® aia 1l Nin H Pli I1 ep @ €11 E l
„ �_ ; T A 6 L eecEl.a� l ` °5152:61!.g c3Hggl�fi6.o a 3°3�®� icp8?file 6
n i ' � N.a @ L l .N. .1: g.pl.HIsG1a g 51111.1, '0 in ®$1 fig 41 l H e
p I; � r A N_o_ 1a_ia•5 °l 5a saa fi I ail l He >
s $ i5E; l-Fsp5c5imE.=1 A°fiHH6 6l g�g i�
n o'2':'- - 8 a E g? a €H 5
m A �t St. c c B9
le H c 83E� �� .�A � fi
m a = a- _ Q,@ la.°l 5 as E IW 5fi H iq a l� 5a 5- fi 8
i ; ;i/ Mmig l l g5.55Q124 er P: @ @i l a5 fia H H
O ,� --R�,' E 5• �,€3 E s aH � g 5a Ill �i fi 5H fic g 5
0 i ?' .n.0,: a 51°'al EH 23• E l s Q 1 ON d
e,5x iI = -1' ,' Seg:'sl Gpi'°&-'s 51555 °IPS 'igs E /� _ 5 . ,,y' .e 5H 55s°I'Se @A H •
- �tr! �� ! '61 �fic $ �a �°
L D 40 l�..s r r r r •a a p e °°� EK.a 54!.?g.: . fid 5-- $ S e- e�
S '•: r r � $ Garzweou»c) HeH�o�se nl llHHa�llle H 3:665a il 11 fi aH !�
ti, gP f.
..J
I e d1i (\j,SURCHARGE AND EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN
drop M <i e DISTRIBUTION FACILITY Fat BUSH,ROED&HITCHINGS,INC. e¢p0'
° i i OAKESDALE AVE.S.W.B MONSTER RD. CIVIL ENGINEERS 8 LAND SURVEYORS SEAL
N 9 Na9 MM°H AVE EAST SEATTLE.WA 9910
° FORRSNTON, WASHINGTON a v arm,vL..i r-L no BRH 4. eNG O�
W FOR BRUCE BLUME wanaw. .� m�L .... ha913234166 �SHING'6
EAL
EKH
IT MATC i it ,e I J 9 ri �MD r.A s FOR
weese eem s 6e eDiman.cmnAID6 ePre>WOOER DAsereD A6]n t. / w oTa. >s.( � yJ/L Ex1N•li V I4 x. Aw1iAa APVA aPECI1IGTIDas 6EaIDw]-T o \C—11� I I N� // ,N Tu In o! s aa) cfis sxAlA 66 AeaA srlwvAwv eux wo.I pV �V /( �.(E..�z) os. www w w xr..I I T'=20' =I �i �� (,IE'e+ialee'BUJ..) P. e-6iecw6CGA6 A PLEuBSLE PIrei(Pu DUP'L a I'"°6iw
1 I II O /y/ // ais Plea o 6 INCHES ABOVE Pleei.Pli
. MOP.SPOON PIOTH FM SOP OF PIPE TONE SO BOITON
N �_�� ` /,,. �Q� N�'P�E '\ I PLUS IFORTY NSIDEI DIAMETER. ABOVE TEL PIPE 2Aw6.TUBE Is BO LIMIT TO TRENCH V g
W T1 \ ?Q �
- •
I I I II I t 1 l �\ \\ ♦ Ex IST 4`BJI4o We /R t.
= I / N / I I =:. \ ♦ 1, >_ w , \ \ z,,
I 5
S ,,
J �S. =In
•
// / iiiiT— -'.II \\ \ I �-t I S y n
i / C 11 4 r eseo.o-I.wE\—\\— —--———-----—— \I Ea w
I
a I ...T P-a,�„ei.I 2'P..,.---- -----_K --, OIli z
'1 ' MATCH I�NE M I— —Pao 2O.. E.SEMEJ •
I D \-- -PPavas et_I-IJb _Iou------ ---__, 02 r
Yf S'S ---_-�—E 15.4..¢... �w
I
1 , L -- - c--- 4 -
Q 2'ie I.G O'SS B o.e% I.E IS.12 -1'1% • _ ,r 245.4 0•CS a..4-/. • I T
`rl I Imo _ —_I-__—__ I.c b•Cse2% I@Y.a b°s� � _-_ .___ _ —___ �-'2 \ r ___ m S
_ O __- - X /I 1��D IJ�PUMP G4ONH�TION - -� --\ I -�
N
^^e,,„, Gar. T..Te a.aeW q / E aUilniJv •I'• tn2,o+p•I.E.I4.44 IJ I I Te..2,4 \ tillat
I E.14.uwr i ��«-ao.m ,Is .1 I.E.Ir.so IJ
I I - o I.E. 5.4 IN I.E.IS.sb wT _--- - -_ -__--_._--..Y.--- _— -_•--___.-___ ^- xie+rlK IIIO
4`.I ; •s TT
�'�- -
a P �ReoE 1 ?� — —
,a- II _le] I
•
s
14_ 1 ..
.. .... : III .. 'I - -,,,Q' k p2
,, W
I x;
.... . . . J 1
flJlSu vs.oE
in
I �
I J �
.. .. �: ,E.ISTWb!aooE --
I f I
3
9
Q
1
.. .. •
:_. .. .--1 - 2bo -• I - wl4.� - '2•s' _. .. .. ..�a'II�a� I:2.3c.:
ia.., . : : .. -I' I. • • • ... ,I J.A.L. / 2.FCK,yI; _ .. ... . I -. .. .. CALL' S:. 4 iv... .. _. .. i,. _ .. . -1.. ... j_Q. I�•89246.OQ
fOAE;YOUDIG
1800-024•5555: :: :
hGOA b•W 4,E.P. 1
RELOCATE I_Izxer CF•-) .wr-r-m ont.-r.I= w e
I^Ii•RrHJ AGYAlOR PVL-e6 z°
m ullEv r E7C/ST. PALE I-12%'x 10%IHE[HJKFL.) I�IL•rSV.CFL.xHJ� [pcc q.IIJFGTICN L�pJL 'f �a
////--I-•-I,O•®.V.(f7--srHJ� I�sb.•Mg:tar-446 N T/PE N 6lN. 1) �bR o=
/ \ � r J.16 G.BIGCYJ.16 A I M V) p
�, 20B LF�IZ•Q/D.u_.52—` P __.__ 223 LF /2"D/.D.t1.52 e.,F— S -Ss L.--12•
a p -b @aGoe o.I.r..a..s2' - _ vrA q.n2 ss - X/S=/
® --AWEA WEN E - Pi2
vocs1.u.(use.caw+) S. W.�� � RaKIJs(u.R,aEeu) y`�\ V &
�J - B•o IE.1a,9 _ Pl Sfl LE,I .' 1 �1 Z
- -_ - � Qu S --- — -- -- - z.E71•Hra.-12.9 _ bra.LE.Iaa .._ _p.�_. m W
-----j - - £7— — \� lP. I 4IATER M6TE' -- - �r - Qxj N¢o e
•
_ _.—_— 0 C- P.I..-./. N 1 l b G�/L ^'l a /r �lQ�� LLC __-, At="�'/=L/i �'/1'J/� • �I . =m
_ o
-- r I �xE,ER 00.0% .��- — - z c
I�as'BaJo(w� �All
Is•Eh..r Isa^ �9- �J,rs)�'Eo�-s5� =ro
O/ Jc.e anI a-- 1.
N1�90 0E - w�� 0 ('r.• ) Ise: d -s ad w
ei-
'- \ • co .ermr u6 0
CB. : I c". .` -> C.B.• SCrYPE X W a
IaC6-,,ease Ea p Ig) I fd Oz
yN Ws..WK.JdW6 MN! I..IDKd (inS A 2w.s6S CFIATiR g a . /�•� w 7
1 J(w "g /-' U U /E/7�K/ cc 0z �u
�'=Zo (*.aasvr I-SJrG�.\TE• �„be. �� �� �.
�J • a c-e•a «. 2 p 20 �0v /.E.//. /q =5
�1 i
...47- T
2,0'y �,
•
f hI Glinsf zd,_I P�PC)hEp QStill.vµ6
y -
3
--' 4.,,;: -(I 1 ••,.. AFE a
C
•` ,,,,..
l\
_ '� L �'. E 1 '� / '''''.7-'''')
__ I I� �
�I' .. �
\ 1 \
I �( /L\io 5.'
�, ,im �'G-- _ �J'--�- Pest Zr.,e,Ee U •i <
y � Was, ~ tl4:- __ p . i
ia21----`-�-N. _ / - ov�- -- SHT.C 7 _� n l_(tiDY o _F_ - I� 11-
sG(hJ
\
L V H \•o I^'I 4iLS'B -,,v4t+) KEY MAP®SKI.._.�9'c a SCALE 1200' Oyn� /-- � „ I I.
/ ` Vp� LN I i {Wy M
xZq' J
le is lb
/ r/ t et::G'GO
r }}���A Th-�o q Q _ Qo a r
// //,AlI//- . -� C-%-•1'•IJ(//• EI) \ Z•'(/•-•�/8(rYPE•r)iGB. 9(TYPE I) No-re.REFER"fp R4J SLIT.Cr2 roe'�PREe.14E 6Dill IRADE . hc�snnP/1, G�i R.H.K.
�� iTE. I5.5o 17.E•/5 5o 1777E. I 5O I
/ :- i E. 12.55 •E/ 50 1 I.E. fa./5 z-za-9a i^=zc' 3-21-.7o
/1s' ll CALL 48 HOURS
•i..,.. BEfORE YOU OE
s 2..g ^ �'rr�/a. rOn q Aw0/ I //nr e_ r.•)rr nArco/ i //I
br 6wr. -s I 1100a245555 �„c-4e 8
coN-nNUEt. BEI- '..-
5Px6tKG-•4
Wv .LPL r�.�1 ig IS �lo'� I / / �' M1•
�1 4 g/ '��... / LLLLLLIII o 2
Z
Q ' 2 -
8 V O9•� •
P�OPOS E� IL�INCo 41� ; NO
I QLiti %
� ' t 5rA?KQGv-fC£�(MJr)R.) ��n ` �.V' +V\�/� , — -
a 25 L.F...M.P.G.,.� MJS�. �' a.• bib 1. y "-.��"' �/ �g
?� Ji 5 I�as^E•.E (p�r L))
mow,,w".v..lwl� �� C) 1� /.�L. ?f�lY- o��.� /!�-"" \n, Ic'o.�iG wE�.,olti6 nJ ILL/
y
=�J O
•
46�BEl.,vp(l�'1.1 Fly) --_`_`- __ ice' /� U.(11- rV $'
Ir;F�eBlG4,9g v1-"x - /��R'i�� ! alQ
0 111 • --->-<------- ——•- ------ -- ------ ----- ------ - \I ,..i Gli
1—yo-ep.,,,crl.l..R.) '
I�I Esea+v FLwU)
I-ro'BE,JOG^.O
co.....•
Aoc.41,16
• PLW PO6EG. au II_o INr-.
IG - -_- -��3GS L-F�•12 P.I.P`9 G',-. 52 --- -..Jl --- 9
3.
at
.. /� —IS Fhn-f.(1YP.) O w
" i
C.o. #9CTYPEIX-a4'9 •
@0.34% n/ �.� W
T-E:16./0�0ti C.F3.e/�(TYPE
y� n' l�SDEC9.9 %cN); I tj t J •3
la //•20 , . .<+/PL aG"s'P'1 I2•NTR.Ik.'1.9 \ iv I —
C.g.#s(TYPE.r--S4'} • 7 / E- !4 to•
„ 0 @ n
/ I.E. /S so Niz
1'• ilt% gg
PRO PO LiE� I3uIL-�IM�o -1 ( - I J r
LIv I--Iz�fe✓=�✓,.,/ I1.5eG/�,sG_ i Ro55iN(.,CWT..BEION� / �uic v+u.GvynJ"N� / R .-G. Ola / I� I N ' \ 24.40 2,W��.E�I�b '1. / 11 { d'�'w��o
SLF. 24"' 132E-F. 24u@O.'_�1/ ,o U FTX 3 O
/ V
U.Y.C. 557- fJ% 30 �% r OIL/WATER.SScrPE R
/- — - i-9a-Be.JvG•I.I.ri>.. q. (7.c-9 \ �n E. y.94- /l
IIN+oCe+lv(FUFu) • N y ' 12.LW.dlo 1•=zo' 3-2(F10
Go.,c IN6. 1 G• ,,YY�� / / NorE:REFER To Fi Iz11 GRpolrJv `\/ BEFORE
YOU
`\1\ / \� \` ^ / I - SS— 5 101E-/ P�>.J ZIT.G-2 Foa tvREcISE 6RnvESI ^' ^1,� I ��1111CYW W so
.�/.C. 7- / II 09 za6.o4
1100.424.5555 _e_gv a
•
•
_ 1.________r____4.. ,_,-,•••,,,,,,,,c,) 1 i ___ -_L___di- , ___ t e#,i, :_
44, •y'�--icy.— -l_re�:lsAhfsxa<au �
'Ns:
^1` ( . , l-rQ.Fcx MJALAV,.._ } ( r!
,fir
xd l' Q..a/\�•
- C\\\. �\ o%,/ �_ coNc.9LKGra1.v/ �I 1 J//01
l� fReoc d L,JC"= - _ o___' R' �"'��__ C' Ij 2
•
,�'I! ��' j\/\�-\��'j{ � - � (k / -_ '/SZ' c�'P /S1^` '`70Z� - _ �.� -- • N ZQ
NNW , / j ' -'^- _ - - -,e. [�'\ a ,(/� [RasS,J[n iR OEION k
..., , r,
;1 /
1; I ✓ ( ! { - -''\-- "` PR°P g•ss - - O->-12''VTR.IE.14.5_ lbZ� N
-/ , --------,,--i,.___,,.__.4.111.01WOMMIIIILMF/ e S cur.
o is cQ,. - - - g
.�t� �� \ i /' 4 2a _2 A
NN� ®' �t2� p' 1 ® 4 .� • 0 w g
% 1 IJQ•0 w- •
li,
e U i/ N0111.10k ltm0 Na.U .
I
�\: , _ -
+-5 \ql) _ \�1\` V 2Gli
, , .,1, , i
t.f!,
SEE SHEE711 N0.C 4 E/ IL i tl/' -_ _ $EE I NBET NO.05 -
'-®. -" y r III:y;', .W.= .*... -- tl
•
411111 ...., • �1 �m. x 14. 4 f+''-_� � ,�.-.l FILL
li
II�.IM� II f+'' r�l CI• ufw-
fit—
�� � 11i - CROSS-DU a FL)VERTICAL TAPPING TEE 8 VALVE "-' \\\ ::".•�.'.,7e
r®, 2-BLIND FLANGES ONE TAPPED 2` 2-PLUG WITH TEMP CROSS IMJ z FL)VERTICAL 2'PLUG CUT ,, •• `\^'^'�'•'^^'•
y,°g L �.. 'y�v 2-CORP STOP BLOW OFF ASSY 2 BLIND FLANGES ONE UPPED 2' PLUG W/TEMP BO ASSY �� -��flit, +
_ ®qan.d, . 2"PLUG BLOCK AS REQUIRED 2"CORP STOP BLOCK AS REQUIRED
'-t",- ®. .�.a Et? BEFORE BEFORE "' ��- v
I; 4
.u° 2i DETAIL,FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY W
7.".....—.----. ,..rjillikal .,.•
AFTER PRESSURE AND PURITY
d II
._.- --..- i T il
IIIII
i1 AFTER PRESSURE AND PURITY REMOVE EXISTING BLOCKING s O N , 3
CONNECT TO TAPPING VALVE W/ CONNECT TO EXIST W/ `•ry�`� N
_'- II� NIPPLES NIPPLEISI "�IIAI SOLID SLEEVE(LP) SOLID SLEEVE ILPI 0
AFTER AFTER 4�" y`if{I14slY.�l . ; w
1 I
DETAIUWATERCONNECTION TYPE II DETAIL'WATER CONNECTION TYPE IV @�'m W,�• �uum., t 2
DO VIEW
10°DETECTOR DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY ° -� -
6°STANDPIPE W/4-2.1/2°NOZZLE «' -^^ FV2°9 2°WATER SERVICE DETAIL 0.c.M. z M•z
CROSS CONNECTION-BACKFLOW PROTECTION ASSEMBLY a2 G.E ""
O�,����, a-
I'-20' 3-21-90
•
ACTS:REFER To FI,JISU SRADI,JW e 1. CALL 48 HOURS
PLA.J so,,-2 f PREGSE SRAVES, w..��..__ ! you De 892Q(,OQ
'n,�o 0 1-000424.5555 c-6 0, , 6
SEE SWEET NO.C`6 R I
I— r
3N 4 Q ..
1
k
bW ✓?
NU 1,..40 / I I I U
---- , HessI I — L j6 `9r / j
il
wW2zn
° / e N / Q I vio a I 9_, w lP // / I ' ' a N
j <_. 6i— , � ! / gI P l �A W /-21APY/NCyCF ?j
1 t , / s z , I l /-COAL.BL IND =o
Ix I I _ / , 1 y � , -I 2 SE,, ERC — N r 1 / D7WTYPe2ZSHT.C&)
{ i 1 1 1 I I — 11
— -1 % • a 1 II W z
k
11
w ill I o w
1 , 1 i :,______., „,,,1
, 0.
i, \/I Z
co 2
co m
•' tGli 4\ - / BUJ I J��l r o 230 LF—/2"Q/.P GL.SL ` b �, 2b.�5±n 3i.34±�W-212-c� CII:t
. I.:'7;/ FINISH FLOOR
� a
• ? / 4I / r
i I I %/
N f + j I 1
4(.—_— C vo;:, . .f'� •- -__—_ '�c,,,,m+� k� /rx.— i._—i— _ — �a�y+y�C�`�_L i'-�,��� ,.i'\ ... �., �,,, J
T / �-��� '.vwe�9 9 / °�°--`/ le. �h"� , �r�— PIS~12
� U
ik
4,0 ! �_� / YY IJ,SJ ,.1 N
I II I I I I at
Z ~V F
3 �- 1 F� _ / , 12
y —I W U
ybPV'N 3Sr c�\ --� e rn °� ° •"`] irb-- �d7 ( O
:1r Cc \ R=.41 n5 /5-ESMf.(>YV� ... __ m z j j 1cc1g`����
'-2•TEB(re / F "! I n 11 J (e Q Y O I-2•C,t[ CFLrM4 / G ' c ' p D G. ce CO ce O 0,
%-come.auciNep i t
Ex/sr r^rcrcr „.° �'""�. ¢ Vfl
2-....h.,........
I
/ \ Ot�plll��� CeLM. R.H.a.
\ • LZa-40
CALL 48 HOURS P.1 I I\ P.L'O' S-11-9.
I\ II II II BEFORE YOU DIG a' 4 °4
1-800-424-5555 K c_2 s &
•4
........
II I -.I _. I I
,r.„.,..,../„..,:. ._,..i..,„..„,„ :„
lo
......,,,,.„:„. .:.„.,.. ..„,,,,,,,...!:
•
. .._ i .
. .
. .
. . ._•
. .
. .
. •
. .
. .
1
. . . . . _.__. ____,_. .
. .
. . . .
1 I.,
. . ,
. .
. • ._ . . . . . . . . ._. .
Hi
,,,,„:), •
. . -.�.
q U
13
1
- - —.
4_ 5-5 -,.i.e-m , se....... M as+ Y 2.a'-4' )
b o o 0 0 0 0 o b
5 L,oG.5 FLOOrc PLAN
DISTRIBUTION FAO LIFY FOY lob no.
D.- as i Igness ate Er elleffr bR.UCE aLLIME CO, a...n
arChiteCte aia RENToN , was NinGTON
lJ' 'Ian ioeooide•oeottt.wash.IMMO,•20171328 2553
dote P.O ...loran cloy
K. _!_1
fff
A 0 G D F G H J Q w : I
55%o" 5�-d 5d-o" 6 C.O.S..-0;3 -0' Z
= a
4V- 6
• •
' U m Ny
•
4 Lfiod/S.p rw-I.QA' A_L$ 9-3
oil-
a 'L.M.'Nw..w✓opA, `I
f 0.T.x---
„��or cg(-�NMYauuooT
- I
0
i
I I
C_1
- - II I -; - --- r—
\ - --- - � t r sfs .yn"Zrrt C '
I �\'
'
r w
tir�r~04 ct _4 T w _�
e `
7
F—T �r�sr 44 c
..�. —_ _— _ III TM_ =
J,�, I _ _ -_-- - -- -_- --Y- GCFA a _ 1 7rb.1"GNG 0 ,o
THI= 4MR AMA - Q„ +u F0•-roI HALA Js
�el �� -
V o.1pe"isATE•- ,T --T.-- -- -- n4scY�YF cFopYvtun { _
rol tag 41) '-- 2Q zd„
ND
— —I— —
_ 5^ _ ._ _ _ _ _.. _ _ r ---- --- 9---.r—=_MnJ.G"�O.LI.IE� _ I — -� _ram ,Maw bfJ4Y.lK w-T u._� --- _ --_
la
z 4.11 I a^M1.Is.z:,.i.:e - _ __ - {_y -'�J •9 P+w."esr�wwrt m h_� �:l' krRi-
F.Nr1W» ftc:e
Tew)
-T ^� ..":,evgE' ��rgglrl4 ! STAGW6�—� m 1`a
lib dfP.r:r 4 n.
1-- ---- -i (wirJ Anw.•q � dd.,..m V 'm m
• w -♦ El: 017; rrl MAP1TAdEdm. . m
I
Elf L
L _____ __ :it�e�6iNs 1 T: {.I V�wTcs�a".aoe 1 +7 01 w
N 1 c'FG ss,,,o • ;R.e�. 1z:o r*.mtr T.a 1.,11 fi m
dl i E—FEWr11.kw �...si 4 4., q' I1', q('.a' `_1 1bAOt I. 4 4 4.q' 4 1 I _ „Wn 3
-- m o' i .:..• - �1 TTPI'-AL PM. -1-IrKA, bAr t -I-Tr:Dnyl` _ a
�1\ � L ti
-j r kuna 1...�s cwei. I I I I I 1. ._ q• 3�®
11w.,,,..,tR FP..
CO
Cm
d o
I _I
n_^�— Joexz'- oc_d' — 1 i PAKTIAL FLOOF� YLAI\l V ..
I I.I7rC4-H Az
n a— p Hi-..,..
F.
mm CD NV IJ 1dyA�dd
ommm s
6g.
7m1
a.
0 1 0 �, aaa a a �, I NId1�d2...44' a g
E IT r, 1 I yq.11...wy z
Li1, ,.,,n.'i.,r i II, 1 --— ----1" d^ Ti?1'.1.4 s rlw„iJ— o
L 7 1 n ,opd sr 7dvx '1.�ro
h led.tlw,4,4
y -i .pr,LLtal,,.M,,.wI,
0 IV -Al her z�
0 mD ©" -
Z r, N © I
�, m w
__ i__. I:
_ I _
E.
' —c NIV1--,n--, id-. 1.
-11I.1" .. ;a `--" 1--zl.-I,, dr�,..+wz i1; .--. If, '°\ qd crla-!k
a v s,,rr, o \3.I,w d
"L. -- __ _— + — P`O _ 1.Mbd w I
2 I
U- I\ 1 4....
Ix 1.111 a
0--- -� - . ,- - - .---- --- - —
i�r+lis y4d c3c2r.11
ill
a ®
\ — OO
a•,Ls/,
0© 3"n"orf.d�aovs - - — r ®_?: 1 •— Nlb'l-JM Jdbi�la O
I
`� 6 �\ `--' (dlJJ i I --k
\n o -- --- nmi.ae,nd.' .zed
- 0 0• ✓ -\ '_-'' `__' i - I'--' MNZi e:e,;',STui,.ij to
IN ii O . - ` I - — i1 la...,*A a Iz n111.9
I z O_
ai t__. __ I __
�. w__d ' .__a I �__�
u
L,,,O i 1 .a;02
I t } I
11. • 0 . i55 p(.4,1. 'i >..rs O e-�v a N W �'o-p ,„
© 9 O 65 © 0 @ O '4f v
I co'-e" 5�tii
A .
•
b [ . ..
o a g-14 i
0
�~ O I IL r ° �. O °Tr]E 4EI�.oore.OM
i•�1 4
41
Y 0
.oei ®i,r• i x " • I i _.
t JewPr I ' 9 II Y —a v u Ali
IoE P.Wt f AW ..
• , �i'L niJCES a, i I TI.y. ®e e6
O vb...,...
e2g ' IUIIIIIIIIIIIR' m ©�.� " .�...... d -I Imo" F,;:. A.� 1 i ,�=A" W!
.11 I I I I • ss/ Inl �I X
-'"It
nel%© ^© a....!.,..) - Jp'i :jid* U:l ylJ"
i�iy�I AI rvNRE Ofe: il
-� ,.o• © SF_c 'tiV FLOcOK P -i
•
i- f
l:w[Ci�'c n �' 1 v
£'•+f u4—'4•arf.' Ii
4:msi6"`
0 l.F9 . R-M 2,91 L
eLCJ..1-erJi..1 Asen. ..
i' ,_.0
KEG G, Cd.ER. I ,_U
gr"e1ARATE fef •f I
n
(qto' _ o-o _ c
Wfn. Lo'xh iPnc. u F �O O O � --.— O L.G �—
e�n•nel 1eA1.4:4 wlsne:r ti- er a .a. j •
I Ui
-it: ^''' �"d` R E.. a.5.. ..1, �.e N o� CIS T� cci� k
r II ��v of w r_ O-. N� O 1 __ m= _ Z
we J.==.1 �-t,-' r n"a N•'�srJ i tele0 m a 'r ' © mr., ADO I:il�V spy
9'-f e`o• y as' ,.• n:sd''J.ccJE W° I � jGG eery 1�- j
i _ r _ e3 OFFICE Q c K
1I MEKI I.r-sTr�n\ _—' Mtn o _ ©um 1 a 9.4
f ID1 105 slog opP t � j �! •� ©3f..—®a 10 ®R e' I� ti .�. .b ,..,
1 I —
IQ © (:M��
�� ^r m V®-• A (ZIP T,r.' e¢� ih© n't�.we < �iu�r a
sReLF
A aIIIIIIII�Q ®- — H - i: 3 - u- '., 1 �x�.i 9_y c o =i 1 r.a»+-s'ad„ I
TTF WfM-AwewF'
,ig
rF�6i e�c r R 9 —J II © —1 v«.v ri
c :-Fs
J se'-c '..-` 'm,. �.w. ....r.P.,r.•xr..ae © ,•' � rene-r 12M a AnoKI, m n
„i•".P•4.n ioUlien =� wu VIDMC..1 = �-J `A B ._
m
44.i.•�".w,wx e 2.4 FIRST FI.�K P-AN t Be -
i'�0,7"Jt t'.1" m�r� UM.P..�,�� •
fZ E'(N(t�`Z Yg"a I'.o" , Y
TT ��f Ijwa\I�\ `, 1. \ 1 I
In 2
1 f 1 _ �-,��. a14f L..=.+dI I ��py�
I Ir--- e • I �(� n
1 EArdralin e shoat
-eoac of mat.awe9 O nr a6eme..c�)� I —_ `/ if
C ki6ft F•IXOM ."12)I.I er. N.. I2o' e F A
........r.
;, I.
-®- .
T sc,,,, (---,) _1477,4,,..., ci)
c? a A,
4,006c.„„ I
T ? P i
1
:. EMEMBEINIE
..4 .-.•;«,---,-1',-'1-1.1.4.--,-".:.:' IIMIIMIIIIIM Z
-, -..., > tr ... -rN.Vee„ . VI g gV
, _I Zc.fa4
m.... i- au e -
voNT 1 ON WE "1" OFFICE M....MVP:MT.! .
Xce,'•••ii)
5) 14) r 4.',74.M. gr7S:I
. ......
t .„„..„&m.„...0,
..n, .
.•
. .
• .—
. - •••.:•......, ,.......,... . , ..-,.;..,...-.... •-.-• •. . • — M —
.:—... - - i.±. - 0=---47=-:1 =1 .77, ., ,.. ..h.::- NMI- 11.• • Fl -= - i
_
, •
...T I T 0 rAr.Th i...}.10sTH eLeVA-no.isl..r.•r2.,,-....,1..=w a, i ? T
. .
. . ._% -
[--i-1 .--
[ D _[ [ I - i • .1, 4_, . I_Li" 7 —1447 • ---i-I-
i
.._
I. ,. WORTH El.EVAT I oN
PA F-T I A 1.- WET
P
L-m
0
T 0
T / 7 iwr 0
T
r..... Li 1.1• ? , +6er) ILI
1-1 LANG
i
1-- • i • . LI_2 I—
Z 7 /
ee.A
,-e
i 7
I
11_ -----1 . 411- -- ' ,
,,, n tutu _
„..,„-,...... v„,,,- ..,EVATI0,1 1 W
PARTIAL. 5oUTH ELEVATION T.V:=4.1.,„„„,,
.-...T ELEVAT I ONJ-LANE 147 2
I-D 1--
INL 2
(7'.
a ©
CI) 5) T 4
? T 91) (11)
4,t
•
i
7.1
,I, •- I i
. SI i i. •J1 , „. .
fl n 11; .
I11 ..
..1 1
<
'ART IA L ..,TI-1 .LEVAT I N [Ti 412 i
_) 03 el
3.a 1
a -
- I
I 1
c
• ,L3, isgs 0:....t
. • A5
•
L!.'
III
• III
l
III
III
UI'
Ill. III
I
I
='iI.i1.1 i
��., ■■■I. F. IIIIIIII F k F_
6 ■■■ I ����� 11 . a 1
11 ,m■■■ k 1 0 1 S 1
II 0
F.
11 I. cin
0 0 ����� 1I o 1.
L
z ,1'I z 11111 Ill o
ill
MI
I111II •
��iii
El■■■
BLDG. p,EXTEKIGK ELEVATIONS
PISTRIDUTIow FAGILIT7 PoK
D B Knee mueller Pf,RUCE P LUNIE CO. a.°w
W 0-s eeeoeiete$
architect8 eie 7.E JTTN I WASH I NlGTON— .nxkea
130 I.k..1a.•.eet6..r..N.9612E•300 325 2503
BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
LA -
CAG-98-080
AGREEMENT SATISFYING AND RELEASING RESTRICTIVE COVENANT REQUIRING
PARTICIPATION IN A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this rg. day of <TUAie 1998 by
and between the City of Renton (CITY) and Seattle Area Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry
Journeyman and Apprenticeship Training Trust, B & G,Renton Partnership and Eland Building
Limited Partnership (collectively hereinafter"PROPERTY OWNERS").
WHEREAS, as part of land development PROPERTY OWNERS entered into a
restrictive covenant filed under Auditor's File No. 9009271241 which is attached as Exhibit A and
incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, that restrictive covenant required PROPERTY OWNERS to participate in a
local improvement district for the improvement of the adjacent roadway and transportation
infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, the CITY is ready to begin adjacent transportation infrastructure
..
improvements; and
WHEREAS, the parties have determined that it would be more advantageous to have a
direct payment of funds to the CITY for the PROPERTY OWNERS' share of those
transportation improvements rather than going to the expense and trouble of forming a local
improvement district;
NOW,THEREFORE, the parties.do agree as follows:
1. The CITY, as the benefited party under restrictive covenants filed under Auditor's
File No. 9009271241 ("The Covenants") does hereby satisfy and release the Covenants in full as
AGREEMENT -Page 1
they relate to the following real property described in Exhibit `B" attached hereto which is
incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
2. PROPERTY OWNERS will pay to the CITY the total sum of$180,000 plus the
cost of undergrounding power on Monster Road adjacent to the PROPERTY OWNERS'
property which is estimated to be approximately $9,000 but not to exceed $10,000. This cost of
undergrounding represents the portion that must be paid by the CITY to Puget Sound Energy
representing the portion of the total costs of undergrounding not paid by Puget Sound Energy but
required to be paid by the CITY or PROPERTY OWNERS as part of an undergrounding project
pursuant to the tariffs of the Washington State Utilities and_Transportation Commission. These
amounts will be paid as follows:
A. $90,000 upon execution of this agreement. it
B. The remaining $90,000 plus the actual cost of undergrounding not paid by
Puget Sound Energy, which amount is estimated to be $9,000 but not to exceed $10,000, one
year after date of execution of this agreement. .
DATED this 'M' day of ,IG O E , 1998.
CITY OF RENTON
By: .
Mayor sse Tanner
AGREEMENT -Page 2
•
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this day of NM, , 1998, before me,
the undersigned, a notary public in and for the state of Washington, duly commissioned and
sworn, personally.appeared JESSE TANNER, to me known to be the Mayor of the City of
Renton, a municipal corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and
acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said City for the
uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated,that he was authorized to execute said
instrument, and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year first above written.
cbckwk
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the state of
Washington.
Notary: 16UQA.ck(A tkA'SW
My appointment expires: 9,1401- p1 -_
TTEST BY:
Marilyn J. et r en, City Clerk
SEATTLE AREA PY,UMII3ING AND
PIPEFITTING INDjJSTRY JOURNEYMAN
AND APPRENTICES G TRUST
By
B &.G RENTON PARTNERSHIP ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BY MONSTER ROAD BUILDING
CORP TION, ITS GENERAL PARTNER
- - ea.„,4 ,
y By
city15:26:as.
AGREEMENT-Page 3
. SA-11L-0. E1
viLE r . RECORD AT REQUEST 07 ,
• OFFIC _ HE CITY CLERK -
• RENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. E,Arial T A
• 200 MILL AVE. SO.
RENTON, WA 98055
AGREEMENT TO WAIVE PROTEST OF FORMATION OF LOCAL IMPROVEMENT III
DISTRICT AND/OR OFF-SITE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS .
ii
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN B & G LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND ELAND
BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND THE CITY OF RENTON TO WAIVE
PROTEST OF FORMATION OF AN LID AND/OR OFF-SITE ROADWAY
IMPROVEMENTS DUE TO POTENTIAL REALIGNMENT OF OAKSDALE AVE. SW
RIGHT-OF-WAY. (See Exhibit B for Potential Roadway Ij
Realignment) .
WHEREAS, B & G Limited Partnership, a Washington limited
partnership (B&G) , and Eland Building Limited Partnership, a 1 �
Washington limited partnership (Eland) , are the Owners of
certain real property located in the City of Renton, ;I
Washington, the legal description of which is set forth on
Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference (the "Property") ; and
1
-i WHEREAS, the real property owned by B&G and Eland which W,i;ll �,� i,
be developed for Warehouse uses will have an impact on th"e"-
need for street lighting, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, one b.alf �) r
roadway improvement, sanitary sewer line extension, and:. -, •_;
undergrounding of overhead electrical and communication: ' .:.
:) distribution lines currently on Oaksdale Avenue SW; and.,:-.y -- :i.;
WHEREAS, as a condition of the Determination of Non- •.. .
;� cy
Significance (Mitigated) issued under City of Renton File.•.NO. -•
ECFG.-112-89, owners are required to proceed with design anc�. :�
construction of off-site improvements prescribed by City-
ordinance, and whereas it has been determined to be in the
best interests of the City and property owners to defer such
II
improvements until the City completes it's design analysis of
the alignment of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. , owners or any
subsequent owners agree to participate in a local improvement
district as authorized RCW 35.43 for the above stated
improvements, when such local improvement district is formed
in the future. Should the City determine realignment will not
occur within ten (10) years from the date of this agreement,
lighting,
to roceed with street
the property owner agrees p
g
P P Y
curbs, sidewalks, gutters, one-half roadway, improvements,
sanitary sewer line extension, and undergrounding of overhead
electrical 'and communication distribution lines abutting the
Property subject
subject to owner' s rights pursuant to paragraph 5
herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby` agreed as follows:
N ,
1. Owners acknowledge that state and city law provide that 'I'I
the City may require certain real property improvements to
be made by Owners as conditions of, and to mitigate '
Page 1 90,09/27 %1241 C
RECC' F 14. 00
RECFEE 2. 00
CPSHSL ***1 h..00
S5 u
J 031 b00(1 G . 54 I . 9S`. 47. 61
effects of, development, and further acknowledge that the
consideration for this Agreement shall be approval of
development on the Property without requiring Owners to
make such improvements until a. future date as determined
by the City of Renton and as described herein.
2 . Owners acknowledge that the City has discussed and plans
to form a local improvement district to improve Oakesdale
Avenue SW to include street lighting, curbs, sidewalks,
gutters, one-half roadway improvements, sanitary sewer
line extension, and undergrounding of overhead electrical
and communication distribution lines on Oaksdale Avenue
SW.
3 . Owners acknowledge that the Property would be specially
benefited by the improvement of Oaksdale Avenue SW to
include street lighting, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, one-
half roadway improvements,: sanitary sewer line extension,
vq and undergrounding of overhead electrical and
communication distribution lines and agree to participate
in the aforementioned local improvement district, which
shall be formed for the purposes of providing such.
4 . Owners acknowledge that if the existing right-of-way
alignment is retained in the local improvement district
final design analysis of Oakesdale Avenue SW fronting the
the Property that the owners agree to dedicate ten (10)
feet of right-of-way to Oaksdale Avenue SW to accommodate
the required one-half roadway widening and, if no local
improvement district is formed within ten (10) years from
the date of this agreement, to proceed with design and
construction of street lighting, curbs, sidewalks,
gutters, one-half roadway improvements, sanitary sewer
line extension, and undergrounding of overhead electrical
and communication distribution lines abutting the Property
subject to owner's rights pursuant to paragraph 5 herein
within ninety (90) days upon written request from the
City.
5. Owners waive their right to protest the formation of any
local improvement district formed for the purposes set
forth in paragraph (3) above; and limited to the
improvements described above, provided, however_, owners
shall retain the right to protest the following: .
a. The method of assessment; and
b. The amount of assessment and special benefit to
the Property; and .
c. The '.boundaries of the local improvement district
and the total amount of the local improvement
Page 2`
district cost.
6. This agreement shall be a covenant running with the land
and shall be filed and recorded in the records of King
County, Washington and shall be binding upon the Owners
and subsequent property owners, their successors, and
assigns.
DATED this /' 7 day of , 1990.•
il
OWNERS: B & G L TED PARTNERSH
ri
is
it
ELAND BL LDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
w� By:
G�2
It
Q
CD ACCEPTED BY CITY OF RENTON:
By: UV\�_._U }
APPRO AS TO E)RM: NI
\_;.
Lawrence J. Ter n
City Attorney
- Page 3,
ACKNOWLEDGED THIS / DAY OF FlIcurt , 1990.
ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
a Washington limited partnership
By Mons er Road Building Corp. ,
a Wa ingtonCorporation
By
Title:
i
B & G NTON PARTNERSHIP,
a Wa gton limited • rship
B - �i�Ghir
ti uce M. Blume, •- -n ging General Partner
7
L
STATE OF W-sn rlrry1 rry ) ss.
COUNTY OF
On this 9 day of RU3L)S—f— , 1990, before
me the undersigned, a Notary Publidn and for the State of
(,�)"sh11 Ai , duly commissioned and sworn, personally
appeared !1/hL . , to me known to be a
General Partner of B & G RENTON PARTNERSHIP, the partnership
that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the
said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of
said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to
execute the said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed
, the day and year first abo 'i ten<
�.�����������►1�� NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State
pN q�+++�, or Waington,=\� esid � t
ti
Y �p �►�,��s'9z %. My commission expi es:
tkOTA
PUBLIC F a,
61:A r0- -9.•b rr gyp=
•
II I 1"Pes WASOTI
STATE OF W g G J O nJ ) !�
ss.
COUNTY OF A/4 CG )
On this TR day of P.U[�U S % , 1990, before
me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of
1 )A51-0.40GT'o nJ , duly commissioned and sworn, personally
appeared s 1 c W. c AvJ A 4 IR , to me known to be the
President of Monster Road Building Corp. , the corporationa
that executed the foregoing instrument as the general partner
of ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and acknowledged the
said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of
said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to
execute the said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed
the day and year first above written.
w . l+
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for he State
k or Washington, residing at
My comms.ssio expires: /z Zr 4/
C�2
CD
•
•
O
' 9
II
- BUST -)ED & HITCHINGS. Irvc.
EXHIBIT B
PARCEL 2:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 24, .
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.H. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4
EAST, W.M. , ALL IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY . DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: •
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24 , IN SAID TOWNSHIP
AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER 1,214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 3, CHARLES
MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH.
j 32°29'51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 85.34 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENT
CURVATURE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN. ARC OF 31°04'57", AN ARC LENGTH
139. 14 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 30 FEET WESTERLY, PERPENDICULAR TO SAID
CENTERLINE OF STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE .SOUTH. O1°24 ' 51" EAST, ALONG SAID
WESTERLY MARGIN, 268.00 FEET; THENCE. SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 02°33' 12" WEST 115.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88°37' 17" WEST 105.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°22'43" WEST 437.90
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°03'09" WEST 283.1)4 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 54°28' 10" WEST 490.44 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO,
MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE NORTH
1 28°11'33" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 115.75 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO
THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 411.73 FEET AND ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 57.49
FEET;. THENCE NORTH 20°11'33" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 156.01 FEET;
THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 523.68 FEET AND ALONG SAID
EASTERLY MARGIN 419.12 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS
OF 667.96 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 6°57'18" WEST; THENCE
EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 102.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 83°41'02" EAST 60.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74°13'19" 'EAST 47.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF
CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD SOUTHWEST, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE HAVING A
RADIUS OF 238.99 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 17°19'04" EAST;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHERLY MARGIN 80.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH
88°03'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 470.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°56'51"
EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'09" EAST ALONG
SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 26.53 FEET TO A.:POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 1°22'43" WEST
FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 1°22'43" EAST 450.00. FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 450,000 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
Hire; •
•
FACILITY
,�VE1 BLUME DISTRIBUTION��� OF S � RENTON, WASHINGTON
BRH JOB NO. 89219.04
Z FEBRUARY 7, 1990 '
•: ALH/SURV. 34
c1STE.0,o
Liao
B ROED & HITCHINGS, INc.
PARCEL 4:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
24,
S TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE
4 EAST, W.M. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, .DP,SCR
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24 IN SAID TOWNSHIP
AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87 26 48" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER 1214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES
MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST; THENCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
85.34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET A
DISTANCE OF 139.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°24'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
268.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2°33112"
WEST 115.03 FEET;- THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST .95.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
88°37' 17" WEST 105.38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH
. 1°22'43" WEST 437.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°03'09" WEST 283.04 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 54°28' 10" WEST 490.44 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO,
MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE
SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 1610.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY
MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD, SAID POINT BEING ON A NON-
TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.37 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS
NORTH 66°59'43" EAST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY MARGIN
250.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED
FILED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8606190933, ;RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH
48°12'23" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 420.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH
r/+ 9°O1'55" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 125.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH
46°16'56" EAST ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 17.69 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 4°58'17" WEST 410.23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING
612,566 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
T
Hire y
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY !I
/ �, RENTON, WASHINGTON
NT of W s4'� BRH JOB NO. 89219.04
4.. ' ;.ii o I FEBRUARY 7., 1990
• �441 2 ALH/SURV. 34
• t4) • a
:1 ./s/s `' 04,E •
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 28, 1994
T : Blume Distribution (SA Q 12-89
O Q ) •
FROM: Lenora Blauman
SUBJECT: Blume Distribution Center(Improvements to the Plumbers and
Pipefitters Site)
Purpose: A meeting was held between Lenora Blauman and Jesse Johnson,
representing the developer of the Plumbers and Pipefitters (PP) complex to consider a
request by Mr. Johnson to waive a Hearing Examiner requirement for pedestrian access to
and along the project site.
Discussion: Mr. Johnson reports that the project site has been subdivided into two
distinct parcels under different ownership since the approval by the Hearing Examiner.
Mr. Johnson has completed the required pedestrian access on the PP site, however, the
other property, belonging to Sid Eland, has been developed with only a portion of the
required pedestrian linkage.
Mr. Johnson reports that he cannot get an occupancy certificate without the completion of
the path, but, as the uncompleted portion of the path is not on the PP site, he cannot
construct the path either. He is requesting that we waive the Hearing Examiner condition.
Staff explained to Mr. Johnson that the Hearing Examiner must formally review any
request for a change in the plan, because the Hearing Examiner initially established the
plan. Under City law, the staff cannot remove a Hearing Examiner condition.
Staff advised Mr. Johnson that completion of the path should be handled directly between
PP representatives and Eland representatives. The City cannot negotiate a solution
between two private parties, but staff would be available to provide support and consider
ideas for resolution of the issue.
Summary: ' Mr. Johnson will meet with Eland representatives to try to arrive at a
solution to this problem and will notify staff if further assistance is needed from the City.
cc: Jim Hanson
Kayren Kittrick
Mark Pywell
�• CITY OF RENTON
sal Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
March 25, 1996
Mr. Jesse Wm. Johnson
Lance Mueller&Associates/Architects
130 Lakeside, Suite 250
Seattle, WA 98122
Subject: Plumbers and Pipefitters Training Center, LUA 89-112-SA,ECF
Dear Mr. Johnson:
I have reviewed the revised landscape plan and parking layout. The proposed changes are under a 10%
change to the approved site plan and therefore do not trigger additional site plan approval before the
Hearing Examiner. The changes, as reflected in the plans received March 21, 1996, are approved.
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 235-2518.
Sincere,
Jana Huerter
Land Use Review Supervisor
cc: Bob Arthur
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055
LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES
L./\/\/\ I aln�of�nrraN :._,..._...-
t
n 9
AR CHIT E C T S • A I A
MAR 2 1 '098
March 20, 1996 BU LoiNci DivisION
Ms. Laureen Nicolai
CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS TRAINING CENTER
Dear Laureen:
Per our telephone conversation on March 18th, please find the attached site plan that will
establish the parking count for the building at 174 stalls.
I am aware that the site plan used for the.Hearing Examiner's report indicated 210 stalls. The
permitted site plan indicated 159 stalls for the project. The 174 stalls is an additional 15 stalls
over the permitted site plan.
In addition, please find the attached revised landscape plan reflecting the current parking
layout.
If you have any additional questions or if I can be of assistance to you please feel free for call
me at 325-2553 X114.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
LANCE MUELLER &ASSOC! TE / CHITECTS
Jesse Wm. Johnson
JWJ:Im
encl.
cc: Greg Fox
plumber.Itr
130 LAKESIDE • SUITE 250 • SEATTLE. WA • 9E3122 • C206) 325-2553 • FAX: (206) 326-0554
ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • SPACE PLANNING • INTERIORS
• 11 r IC/pcp
LANCE MUELLER E. AS �,CIATES
)k.Q(Aiiti.l
' A R C H I T E C T S A I A
O
CITY OF RENTON
EC IVED,
March 20, 1996 n
e E 11 .X '1 f2
Ms. Laureen Nicolai `
CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS TRAINING CENTER
Dear Laureen:
Per our telephone conversation on March 18th, please find the attached site plan .that will
establish the parking count for the building at 174 stalls.
I am aware that the site plan used for the Hearing Examiner's report indicated 210 stalls. The
permitted site plan indicated 159 stalls for the project. The 174 stalls is an additional 15 stalls
over the permitted site plan.
In addition, please find the attached revised landscape plan reflecting the current parking
layout.
If you have any additional questions or if I can be of assistance to you please feel free to call
me at 325-2553 X114.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
LANCE MUELLER &ASSOCI TE C.HITECTS
Jesse Wm. Johnson •
JWJ:Im
encl.
cc: Greg Fox
plumber.Itr
130 LAKESIDE • SUITE 250 • SEATTLE. WA • 98122 • C206] 325-2553 • FAX: (206) 32S-0554
ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • SPACE PLANNING • INTERIORS
LANCE MUELLER & AS CIATES
LES- CITY OF RENTON
C E I V
A R C H ITECT S • A I A �?
NPR, 2 6 1993
March 20, 1996
BUILDING DIVISION
Ms. Laureen Nicolai
CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS TRAINING CENTER
Dear Laureen:
Per our telephone conversation on March 18th, please find the attached site plan that will
establish the parking count for the building at 174 stalls.
I am aware that the site plan used for the Hearing Examiner's report indicated 210 stalls. The
permitted site plan indicated 159 stalls for the project. The 174 stalls is an additional 15 stalls
over the permitted site plan.
In addition, please find the attached revised landscape plan reflecting the current parking
layout.
If you have any additional questions or if I can be of assistance to you please feel free to call
me at 325-2553 X114.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
LANCE MUELLER &ASSOCI TE CHITECTS
Jesse Wm. Johnson
JWJ:Im
encl.
cc: Greg Fox
plumber.ltr
130 LAKESIDE • SUITE 250 • SEATTLE. WA • 9E 1 22 • (208) 325-2553 • FAX: C2067 328-0554
ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • SPACE PLANNING • INTERIORS
LANCE MUELLER & AS.�..CIATES
? .
CITY OF RE V
ED',
A R C H I T E C T S • A I A MAR
y 93(A.�m 1
March 20, 19963 BUILDING DIVISION
Ms. Laureen Nicolai
CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS TRAINING CENTER
Dear Laureen:
Per our telephone conversation on March 18th, please find the attached site plan that will
establish the parking count for the building at 174 stalls.
I am aware that the site plan used for the Hearing Examiner's report indicated 210 stalls. The
permitted site plan indicated 159 stalls for the project. The 174 stalls is an additional 15 stalls
over the permitted site plan.
In addition, please find the attached revised landscape plan reflecting the current parking
' layout.
If you have any additional questions or if I can be of assistance to you please feel free to call
me at 325-2553 X114.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
LANCE MUELLER &ASSOC! TE CHITECTS
..ems-cam
Jesse Wm. Johnson •
JWJ:Im
encl.
cc: Greg Fox
plumber.ltr
;1 30 LAKESIDE • SUITE 250 • SEATTLE, WA • 951 22 • C2O6] 325-2553 • FAX; (206]•328-0554
ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • SPACE PLANNING • INTERIORS
BRUCE
BLUME
&COMPANY REAL ESTATE
September 2 , 1992
Mr. Mark Pywell PLANNING DIVISION
c/o City of Renton Planning Department CITY OF RENTO►N
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055 SEP 0 3 1992
RE: SA-112-89 {E+ try CU)
Dear Mr. Pywell:
I am in receipt of your letter dated August 10, 1992
referencing the above noted project. Subsequent to your
letter, a copy of which I presented to the property owners,
we discussed your proposed conditions. At present we see no
problem with the content of the letter with the exception
that the December, 1992 building permit submittal date
requirement may be unrealistic. Currently, the owners are
just beginning the design and planning stages and we
anticipate a minimum of two months of design review, re-
drafts, approvals and so forth.
As I mentioned by phone yesterday, the owner of the property,
the Seattle Area Plumbers and Pipefitters Trust is a non-
profit organization comprised of labor, management and
operations people. In order for this facility to accomplish
the desired task, the design must receive above standard
internal review by all parties. As a result, we anticipate a
longer than normal owner design and review process.
Given the above, I am requesting your reconsideration of the
December, 1992 submittal deadline contained in your letter. I
propose an alternative submittal deadline of March 1993 . I
believe the extra three months will provide adequate
protection to avoid unforeseen delays whether they be in
owner design and review or requested City clarifications.
Please respond to me at your earliest opportunity in order
that I timely advise my clients.
Thank you.
Sin prely,
/1146 QtAiko,\.
Jartles D. Garrison
cc. Jack Moss
James Massart
Lance Mueller
2825 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST, SUITE 310 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98102 (206)324-1800 FAX (206)324-6150
CIT' OF RENTON
Olmaa Hearing Examiner
Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman
August 29, 1994
Mr. Jesse Wm. Johnson
Lance Mueller & Associates
130 Lakeside, Suite 250
Seattle WA 98122
Re: CITY FILE NO.: SA-89-112, (BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY)
PLUMBING& PIPEFITTING TRAINING FACILITY
Dear Mr. Johnson:
In response to your August 22, 1994 letter, this office has enclosed a copy of
page 6 of the Hearing Examiner's May 29, 1990 decision on the above referenced
matter. A copy of the conditions imposed by the Environmental Review
Committee (ERC) is also enclosed. These documents outline the requirements
and conditions imposed on the site plan.
If you need additional information, please submit specific questions.
Sincerely,
$()
Fred J. Kaufman
Hearing Examiner
FJK/dlf
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593
LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES cnECuo
Ism.,\/\/
AR CHI T EC T S • A I A A G 2 5 1994
August 22, 1994 HEARING E AMIN
ER
Mr. Fred J. Kaufman
Hearing Examiner
CITY OF RENTON
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: FILE#SA 89-112
PLUMBING & PIPEFITTING TRAINING FACILITY
Dear Mr. Kaufman:
Is a property required to comply to the conditions placed on the property by a previous H.E.
report? I am asking this question due to the following items:
1. Said property has been subdivided and has been sold to a second party.
2. Compliance of H.E. with conditions would require work being extended beyond the
new property to the adjoining property.
Please respond as soon as possible to the above questions. If there is any additional
information that we can provide feel free to call.
Thank you for your information and consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
Y
LANCE MUELLER &ASSO IATES RCHITECTS
Jesse Wm Johnjot._
JWJ:Im
PLUMBERS.LTR
130 LAKESIDE • SUITE 250 • SEATTLE. WA • 98122 • (206) 325-2553 • FAX: (2063 325-0554
ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • SPACE PLANNING • INTERIORS
CITY OF RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann,Administrator
August 10, 1992
Mr. James Garrison
Bruce Blume & Co.
2825 East Lake Ave. East, Ste. 310
Seattle, WA 98102
SUBJECT: SA-112-89
Dear Mr. Garrison:
We have reviewed the site plan submitted for the proposed development of the building for the Plumbers
and Pipefitters. It appears that the proposed building fits does not create a change to the original site
plan that would require the submittal of a new site plan application. The proposed development will need
to comply with the conditions of approval established by the Hearing Examiner, the mitigation measures
established by the Environmental Review Committee and all relevant City Code-requirements and
standards.
It has been over two years since the project was approved by the Hearing Examiner. However, the fact
that this would be a phased development was discussed at the public hearing without a firm phasing
schedule being established. As your representative did approach the City about the time that the two
year period was expiring, we feel it to be reasonable to allow you to proceed with the submittal for a
building permit as long as this submittal can be accomplished prior to the end of this year. I would also
note that your submittal must comply with all relevant City Code requirements which would include but
not be limited to the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Elements of the design that were
based upon previous code-requirements may need to be amended in order to comply with the Codes and
Ordinances that have been developed since the original approval date. These matters would be
resolved through the building permit process.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 235-2550.
Sincerely,
Mark R. P I
Project Manager
cc: Jesse Johnson
Lance Mueller&Associates
130 Lakeside Suite 250
Seattle, WA 98122
plum ttr/leters
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055
CITY !F RENTON
, (� Office of the City Attorney
Earl er Mayor Lawrence J. Warren.
•mod CITY OF RE F g ON
JAN 0 7 19 2
January 7 , 1992
Cc 9 Y CLERK'S OFFICE
, ITO: Ron Nelson, Building Official
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RE : Hold Harmless and Release Agreement - Eland :Building
Limited Partnership
Dear Ron:
I have reviewed the above-referenced document and the same is
'approved as to legal form.
G7tc
Lawrencee J. Warren
LJW:as .
cc : Mayor Clymer
'A8 . 78 : 21 .
J1
III
Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street -Renton, Washington 98057- (206) 255-8678
HOLD HARMLESS AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
This Hold Harmless Agreement is executed this ?Z day of
January, 1992, by Eland Building Limited. Partnership ( "Eland" ) .
Recitals
A. Eland is the owner of the real property ( "Property" )
legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference. The Property is part of Blume
Distribution, Facility (the portion of which is located on the
Property the "Project" ) which is the subject of City of Renton
File Nos . 'ECF-112-89 and SA-112-89 ( "Application" ) .
B. The Application seeks site plan approval of the
Project, a warehouse/office complex, including one structure,
parking and service areas, landscaping and recreational
amenities .
C. On April 11, 1990 , the Environmental Review Committee
of the City of Renton issued. a Revised Determination of
Non-Significance Mitigated for the Project, which included inter
alia, Condition No. 6 requiring a "Hold Harmless" Agreement
insuring that the municipality will not be responsible for any
damage occurring to the site or developments thereupon resulting
from flooding on the Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City of Renton' s
issuance of site preparation/building permits and a certificate'
of occupancy for the Project , Eland agrees as follows:
1 . Hold Harmless. Eland covenants and agrees that it
will , for the life of the Project, protect, defend and hold the
City of Renton harmless from and against, and hereby releases
the City from and against, any and all claims , demands , losses ,
damages , costs , charges, liabilities and attorneys ' fees arising
from any damage occurring to the site or improvements located 'on
the Property resulting from flooding on the Property, including,
but not limited to, any flooding or damage to the site or
improvements .on the Property resulting from the existing
retention or detention pond located on and adjacent to the
Property; however, nothing herein shall require Eland to
protect , defend or hold the City of Renton harmless from, or to
release the City from, the consequences of the City of Renton' s
01/02/92 -1-
sole negligence, the sole negligence of any of the City of
Renton' s agents or employees, or. the consequences of any future
development around the existing retention or detention pond.
2 . Agreement to Run With the Land. The burden of this
Agreement shall be deemed to run with the land and shall be
enforceable against Eland and its successors and assigns ,
including, without limitation any present and future owners of
the Property or any portion thereof .
ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
a Washington limited partnership
By: Monster Road Building Corp. , a
Washington corporation, its
general partner
By
S ' d W. land, President
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss .
COUNTY OF KING )
This is to certify that on this 3 day of January, 1992,
personally appeared Sid W. Eland, Jr . to me known to be the
President of Monster Road Building Corp. , a Corporation, to me
known to be a general partner of Eland Building Limited
Partnership, the limited partnership that executed the within
and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument
to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation
and said partnership for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and an oath stated that he was authorized to execute
said instrument .
Witness my hand and official seal the day and year in this
certificate first above written.
Notary Publ`i. in and fo hectate of
Washington, residing at nkorks, \ �n
My commission expires : 1Z.\lC3\9 Z
GEF-315
01/02/92 -2-
•
EXHIBIT A
•
•
•
THAT.:-FORTIQN OF THE SOFT.,QPUTER AND' GOVERNMENT LOT. 1., S. t J ON --2 4, •
•TOWNSSP 2:3 .NORTH, RANGE 4 UST,: WILLANETTZ MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY:, •
WASHINGTOW AND T .. SOW, .QUAKER AND GCTERRMENT LOT 6, S t:C:t'ZON 13 ,
TOWNSHIP 23• NORTH, RANGE. 4 . EASfir WTT AXETTR MERIDIAN, ALL IN RING - .
COUNTY, W.ASBI TON, MORE' PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:.
•
CUrsrte.'2.CIIcG. AT THE 'QUARTER CORNER! BETWEEN SECTION 13 AND 14, IN SAID
TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; .
THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 26'43" WEST, . ALONG, THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214.00 FEES' ItTHE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO►
• 3, Cam•' MONS-rzat .ROAD• SOATEWEST 'AND NOW ENOWN AS. `y:L'73LL HILL ROAD:
THENCE. s0L= 32 DEGREES 29'51" FAST, .ALONG SAID WESTERLY. YARGIN 83.34
ME TO A POINT OF TANGENT .CURVATURE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A .
• RADIUS Of 256.4E F I .
-THENCE SOTITHEAVERLY ALONG: SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ARC OF 31 DEGREES .
04 'S7', .AN ARC IJENGTH 139.1"4`..'� 'EET TO A POINT WHICH •IS 30 FEET WEST2RLY,
PF.RPENDIC LAR TO SAID CENTERLINE; OF STEEL HILL ROAD;
SCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 2.4'51w: EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 268,00
- FEET; '
• THENCE SotlTH 8S DEGREES 3E'09" WEST 436.55 'FEET;
Z ZN E SOUTH 02 DEGREES 33' 12" WEST 115.03 .7 ; •
• THENCE SOUTH .70 DEGREES 05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET; •
. TEENCZ SOUTH 83 DEGREES .37'17 u WEST 105.38 FEET;
THENENCZ NORTH. 1 DEGREES 2 2,.4 3" .WEST 437.9 0 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT Off'
BEGI ZING; . •
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES. 03'09i' WEST 283. 04 .FEET;
THENCE SO.J.rf 34 DEGREES• 28'10 0' WEST 490.44. PFZT TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN
or THE. CHICAGO, MILWADKEE, sT'. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OP
WAX;
THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES .171'33" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 115.75 . .
FEET;.
THENCE ON A•CURVE TO THE RIGHT HALVING A RADIUS OF 4.11.73 FEET AND ALONG
SAID' EASTERLY MA GIN 57.49 FEET1.
THENCE NORTH 20 DEGREES 1Z' 33# .WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 156.01 •
FEET; • ' •
THENCE ON .A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 523. 88 FEET AND ALONG
SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 419.12 SET TO A POINT OS. A NON-TANGN'A CURVE HAVING
A RADIUS OF 667.96 FEET, .TEE RADIUS POINT of WHIM MARS NORTH 6 OEGR,£FS
57'18"' WEST, .
THENCE L':.STiRLY ALONG SAID CURVE '102.86 FgET;
THENCE.NORTH $3 DtaRzEs 42'02" EAST 60.83 FEET; .
THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 13'19" EAST 47.60 FEET 'IQ A POINT. ON TEE
so T.iBERLY MARGI NN OF CHARLES MONSTER CQL=N Y ROAD SOUTHWEST, SAID POINT
BEING ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 238.99, ?sea'. THE RADIUS POINT OF
WHICH BEARS NORTH 17 DgaftErs '64* EAST;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID. CURVE AND SOUTHERLY MARGIN 80.36 PEET;
THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES, 03'0,9" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTM'RY Y MARGIN. 47 0. 9 3
FEET; ..
THENcxs s.0y4'4 1 DEGREES 56'SX10 EAST ALONG SAID SOUTL LI'MAIN 10.00
THEScE NORTH 88 .DEGREES 031094 FAST ALONG SAID souTTIERLX MARGIN 26,53
PEST. TO A POINT WHICI BEARS NORTH 1 Draw= 22'43" WEST FROM. T&E TRUE
POINT OP BEGIVNII4G i
TUN= SOUTH 1 DEGREES 22''43" EaaW 450.00 FIV2 TO TH$ TRUE PAINT OF •
BEt3IN3rING. • . • .
.
•
•
TOTAL P:04
CONFERENCE REPORT& - � � U.!
• COMPENSATION AGREEMENT
NAME OF PROJECT: Jpl�,l� ,4""�/ ie#j°S A r c '0l4 ,
DATE OF CONFERENCE: 7' Z 7 PROJECT WORK ORDER NO.
r
START TIME: 13cEND TIME: TOTAL# OF MINUTES:
ALL PERSONS ATTENDING SIGN BELOW
NAME AND TITLE ADDRESS ORGANIZATION PHONE
/1/ al;it/ // !i'l%Y be, �no'�! 23.E—�5 f
- �6=tS0v� �lw .2 tiCED�.5-4N 'Are- 41aftki y32(.% t°Z 3v4-- 1�6d
t4/W 43nisit. GA4 4- 32s zss -
ze-)6-7t-t& 7,6/22_
COMMENTS:
AGREEMENT:
The undersigned agrees to pay $75.00 per hour for each future hour of City Staff review time
prior to formal application.
Applicant to be billed on a monthly basis. Payment shall be due within 15 days of receipt of
statement. Payment in full must be received before future services can be provided.
Name (Printed) S': ature date
1 /O
Address S —, li(m— 6,e2-a.
tp/confrpt/PJP/bh /
1!
I
I 1
I
'
,
• .
••
„ •
. .
-
�„
} -.sctsr«YiaL-ix
1 D
..,-,: ''',.N.Ni, -
;.6 •
. .I / /../ ./ .///y..v.s---;
...,;,1
- ~
. : •t C.)
Y. -r f'l
l L\ r
1.
21
_ . - :4 r�,
;., Q7
i
- - . 1
Post•ItN brand fax transmittal memc ,_ ' , -`r-_ :_ •
maigrrAlZigir7iffrc' a-.- —
Co. Af►- .o.v.,' Cc. . _ --
" - _- -
Depl. Mk j; r' aG:tcc: ,
{Fax —., _
__ f
;,•
f
0 `f
c a cy) 3JJ r
CD Lt-i �. ..
z >- I�
a_ U :ems r__, .-.. -_-- - ' .._ r
• r
•
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 27, 1992
TO: Gregg Zimmerman
Randall Parsons
FROM: Mark Pywell
SUBJECT: Blume Construction
Attached are the latest drainage plans for the Blume projects. This plan is suppose to allow them to
develop lots 3 and 4A. They already have a plan submitted for lot 3, a warehouse development, and will
soon be submitting an application for a building to be used by the Plumbers and Pipe Fitters Union on lot
4A. From past discussions it seems to me that the drainage plans need to be finalized before we can
consider the site plans. If these plans do not provide the information you need or if you feel they are
inadequate please let me know so we can decide on a course of action.
Thank you.
PRODUCT 23902 ( ees/Inc.,Groton,Mass.01471.To order PHONE TOLL FREE 1 a-800.2259 -ti `
Pi A
PARKWOOD GREEN INC. ,C ` r JIER E 7 " n LaG�g'C1 � U
12510 128th Ave. NE
KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 jj��' gry
DATE JOB N'O .. ���>
Phone 821-1922 �"' k k • �1 i � �' .,.
ATTENTION 1Y
RE:
_._ ..._L.i 1—.1.774.1�....� �--< c . rtiza E � —t1 / fit. Vi---i
J7
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop drawings /Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
_ 1 1 _ 1
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
or approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
s requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
,`--1CT--ice P- S THE- ?.19%i=Q E_Tt._ @-1 cD f 1.4r-1-1 CZ,V- YGC-/t�
-A?p- a��. • d N�a.C�� <- -� • 'A—a U�S e✓LTI�►cc) 1- E
r►r-4 i5 M P 1--- p (�`k— , o 1 "r-iorlr . 'tom - 0.1 iArl.v ._ lac.,hc
l I-iEN -p cc1`1FI Fi as=-ter c Ebcc?- �--k L.Q- T c�,iA ? \t S
t
C_ c?\. iT
14V—
COPY TO I SIGNED: \ - l ?t )c.)
If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once.
BUSH, ROED & HITCHIPI ', INC. r� �V1 ISdwIU1 /�
Civil Engineers/Land Sur is L� � CIF uQw I
2009 Minor Avenue E.
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98102
DATE �� JOB NO w(� I
/'� /s%Jw
(206) 323-4144 FAX 323-7135 ATTENTION
teeter
TO L.I D t ee0 o 1)144 1 RE. I Ile # i Y r- 8
Zoo Mill 41.e. so. .6.4.,SULtrvt)
Re /oi , w14 98655
WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via 1454 Mall the following items:
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
lead, 1--z9-1 z re rDIf pri47ids shochi% revised l-epis
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
JAN 3 1 1991
HECciVED
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment CI
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO _ri ()soil D
`r /� SIGNED: dal/ wz.azts
le, v -
PRDDUCT240-3 /n e/Inc.Dmmn,Mass.01471 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
•
oir E
ENviRoNmENTAL
ii
DECLARATION ECF;SA-112-89
APPLICATION NO.
PROPOSED ACTION BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
BRUCE BLUME
•
The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two
structures, parking and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a wetland
on the site -- .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the remainder will be enhanced with
native vegetation. The 16 acre project site is vacant and is zoned for manufacturing park use.
•
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
The property is located at 601 Monster Road.
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED
PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE ( E.R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
CDOES XDOES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
flWILL XWILL NOT
BE REQUIRED.
THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS
PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW.
COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P.M., MARCH 20, 1990
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
cmy
I:RUC E 1'1AR O 21990
1I ' 1 .
&COMPANY REO Et-V V
March 2, 1990
Lenora Blauman
City of Renton
Municipal Building
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Wa. 98055 Hand-Delivered
Re: Renton Property
Dear Lenora:
The purpose of this letter is to confirm the uses which will
occupy the large building at 601 Monster Road in Renton. The
building will be occupied by two (2) major companies.
First, Sid Eland Corporation, which will own the property
effective April 30, will occupy approximately 157 , 000 square
feet of warehouse space. Sid Eland is a beverage
distribution business which will not be storing any beverages
or liquor with an alcohol content of more than 20%.
Second, Container Corporation of America, will occupy
approximately 50, 000 square feet with the possibility of up
to 60, 000 square feet with subsequent reduction of Sid Eland
by 10, 000 square feet. Container Corporation of America will
be storing broken down cardboard boxes (i.e. McDonald' s Happy
Mcal, Nords trans) .
Should you have any questions, please call me or Jim
Garrison.
Ve y ly yours,
e . Blume
146 NORTH CANAL STREET, SUITE 310 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98103 (206)632-1800 FAX (206)633-4680
BRUCE
BLUME
&COMPANY REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS
February 26, 1990 9 y�
KA�FJ��3 NG. MOON
Lenora Blauman CIRRENTON
Senior Planner FEB a i op
c/o City of Renton
200 Mill Ave. South
Renton, Wa. 98055 is?. , "k,,1; �
Dear Lenora: •
Per our phone conversation today, attached is the copy of our
traffic study which you requested.
Sincerely,
Ji Garriso
146 NORTH CANAL STREET, SUITE 310 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98103 (206)632-1800 FAX (206)633-4680
066 7- '.r-.rian-sq 83-
NNNNMNNNINMNNNNNNNAINNNNNNIXINNNNNNNWNXN.NNNNNNIINN NNNNNN I NNNIIIIMM1 NI NNNNNNNNNNINWNNNNNNNNNNN11144 N9NNNMNMHINNINNNNNNN!HNNiNRIN1iNNNiff.yi
•
-' LI?IO br.3 MCP L.LINZMW as?' 0=r02Id
INTVra-PATo 1U.WI2 '7El" man 23 El-
mowntmumnsimm111pA1imainIp10111WIN11111iR11meimummrot111p11orniwomemmemmitumuMWn01NM41 nramila tneun1unwa1111t10g1O1M1�E1111111t1111lltIN1mminaternonnurnmu111Y0orn. rtmenu11tlImtmo I1NOX11M1eOO11O111pIM1
NNIINNNNNNIINNNNNNNdXffiPNN111HMN11NNNNNININNNIN�IINH}IitINHIMNiNHiNMIPNMINIIXN pNNMNNNNXXNNNiMN11 NHINNipNNN14NINNNINN}fNHNNNNINNNNiINNINNNINII{NIN!gpNN1NNNN!NHIN1
..TOGrB cTJ'J'Er..t1
/
- z
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1
Scope of the Report 1
Project Description 1
Existing Land Use 3
Existing Transportation Facilities 3
Transit Service 4
Planned Transportation Improvements 4
EXISTING CONDITIONS 5
Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 5
Existing Level of Service 5
Background Level of Service 9
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 14
Site Generated Trips 14
Trip Distribution/Assignment 15
Total Volumes With Proposed Project 19
Level of Service With Project 19
Signal Warrant Analysis 19
CONCLUSIONS 21
REFERENCES 22
FIGUF4ES
1 . Vicinity Map 2
2 . Existing Volumes 6
3 . Background Volumes 13
4 . Site-Generated Traffic 18
5 . Total Traffic With Site 20
TABLES
1 . Level of Service Definitions (Signalized Intersections) . . . 7
2 . Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections . . . . 8
3 . General Level of Service Descriptions 10
for Unsignalized Intersections
4 . Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections 11
5 . Estimated Trip Generation, Bruce Blume & Company, 16
Proposed renton Site
j
4 r -.
INTRODUCTION
SCOPE OF THE REPORT
The purpose of this report is to describe the traffic related
impacts of constructing a distribution facility for Bruce Blume &
Company on Oakesdale Avenue, S.W. in the City of Renton. Figure
1 shows the location of the site for proposed development .
Specific traffic related issues discussed in this report include:
o Existing land use and traffic conditions in the project
study area
o Estimates of trip generation, distribution, and
assignment for the proposed development
o The impact of the proposed site development on traffic
operations at key intersections and site driveways
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Bruce Blume & Company is proposing to build a new distribution
facility in northwest Renton on a vacant site on the south side of
Oakesdale Avenue, S.W. The proposed development will consist of
two buildings with a total of approximately 267 ,400 square feet of
floor space. Building A, located adjacent to Oakesdale Avenue S .W.
will have approximately 218, 300 square feet of floor space,
including 16, 000 square feet of general office space. Building B
is located at the back of the site and will contain 49, 100 square
feet of distribution floor space. A total of 251 , 400 square feet
will be used for the distribution activities .
All of the office space in Building A and approximately 152, 300
square feet of distribution space in Building A will be used by a
single user that intends to consolidate its current activities at
other sites into the proposed site. The remaining 50, 000 square
feet of distribution floor space in Building A will be used as a
' storage facility by a nearby organization. The floor space in
Building B will be occupied by atenant that is assumed to have
' operating characteristics similar' to the distribution activities
in Building A.
The current site plan calls for three site access driveways, all
from Oakesdale Avenue S.W. The center driveway would serve the
majority of truck movements to/from the site, while the easternmost
driveway would provide access for, the general office space. The
eastern driveway will also serve as a truck access to Building B,
which will include 49, 100 square feet of floor space. The western
driveway will provide supplemental access for truck trips generated
by Building A activities .
1,
�6'41 A 1 f tv, /A.
.y(9 i
y
4
h ibc.'
9� c
13111� 6�4*, ,y
7......, ..... .. ft° .
31 I $ 0 I
a
N �y
t % 1 t� s. 3
Th
0
N
•� to
IA Z
a LIND
IA
y �E
:,,, ,,.A.eamit.PE
r
o
0
v\
EXISTING LAND USE
Much of the land in the site vicinity is vacant . Adjacent to the
proposed site, just to the east , is the Container Corporation of
America facility, which includes general offices and light
industrial uses . Just to the west of the proposed site is an
existing gravel/concrete recycling operation. South and east of
the site is Metro' s Renton Wastewater Treatment Plant .
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
Direct access to the proposed site is provided by Oakesdale Avenue
S.W. , which becomes 68th Avenue South and connects with Martin
Luther King Way South approximately 0 . 7 miles northwest of the
site. East of the site Oakesdale Avenue extends to an intersection
with S . W. Grady Way, then passes under Interstate 405 with a
temporary termination at S .W. 16th Street . Southwest 7th Street
intersects with Oakesdale avenue approximately 0 . 5 miles east of
the proposed site.
Access to Interstate 5 and to Interstate 405 is via Oakesdale
Avenue and Grady Way to the south and east of the site . Access to
Interstate 5 , north, is also found via Martin Luther King Way to
the north and west of the site. Following is a brief description
of key access facilities for the proposed site.
o Oakesdale Avenue S . W. Beginning at S .W. 16th Street ,
Oakesdale Avenue is a five-lane facility, with two lanes
in each direction, plus a center lane that is used for
left turns or as a center median. The cross-section
includes curbs and gutters . This section extends north
and west , with signalized intersections at S .W. Grady Way
and S .W 7th Street . Sidewalks are on both sides between
Grady Way and S . W. 7th Street . North of S.W. 7th Street
there is a sidewalk on the north/east side only, and
south of Grady Way, there are no sidewalks . The five
lane section ends approximately at the east boundary of
the proposed site. At this point, Oakesdale Avenue
narrows to a two-lane facility, with open ditch drainage,
and no sidewalks. Oakesdale Avenue becomes 68th Avenue,
South, crosses the Burlington-Northern Railroad, via an
overpass , and extends in a northerly direction to the
intersection of Martin Luther King Way, South. Traffic
on 68th Avenue South is controlled by a stop sign at this
intersection .
o S .W. Grady Way: Between Interurban Avenue and Rainier
Avenue South, Grady Way is a four- to five-lane facility
with two lanes in each direction and a left-turn lane.
The cross-section generally consists of curbs , gutters ,
and sidewalks ; however, west of Oakesdale Avenue, there
3
is a sidewalk on the north side only. In addition to the
traffic signal at Oakesdale Avenue, there are also
traffic signals at the intersections with Interurban
Avenue, Powell Avenue, Lind Avenue, and Rainier Avenue,
South. Access to Interstate 405 is available from Grady
Way both at Interurban Avenue and Rainier Avenue, South.
o Martin Luther King Way, South: This facility becomes
Sunset Boulevard in the' City of Renton. West of 68th
Avenue it consists of a four-lane roadway, with two lanes
• in each direction, and it has open ditch drainage, with
no sidewalks . At its intersection with 68th Avenue,
South (Oakesdale Avenue extension) , there is no left-turn
lane for westbound traffic. Even though the demand for
this movement is low, vehicles attempting to turn are
exposed to rear-end accidents when stopped in the left
lane . The above cross section continues east to Stevens
Avenue. At Stevens Avenue, the section widens to allow
for left turn lanes , and includes curbs , gutters , and
sidewalks . There are traffic signals at Rainier Avenue,
Hardie Avenue, and at Stevens Avenue. There is also a
traffic signal at South 129th Street . The speed limit
outside the City of Renton is 50 mph.
o S .W. 7th Avenue: East of its intersection with Oakesdale
Avenue, this facility provides a four- to five-lane
roadway, with curbs , gutters , and sidewalks . It extends
east to Rainier Avenue, where there is a traffic signal .
There is also a traffic signal at Hardie Avenue.
TRANSIT SERVICE
There is no existing transit service on Oakesdale Avenue, adjacent
to the site . The nearest transit services are on Martin Luther
King Way and Grady Way.
PLANNED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
Conversations with the City of Renton indicate that there are plans
to extend the five-lane section on Oakesdale Avenue from its
present terminus near the proposed site northwesterly to the
intersection of 68th Avenue and Martin Luther King Way, generally
along the existing 68th Avenue alignment . There are no detailed
plans for this improvement . It is potentially implementable within
the next 5 to 10 years .
It is also understood that traffic signal warrants are met at the
intersection of 68th Avenue and Martin Luther King Way, and that
a traffic signal will be installed at that location when funding
becomes available.
4
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PEAK-HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Consultations with City of Renton staff resulted in collection of
a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes at two intersections in the
site vicinity: Oakesdale Avenue/Grady Way and 68th Avenue/Martin
Luther King Way. Manual turning movement counts were conducted by
Kittelson & Associates at these two locations between 7 : 00 and 9: 00
a.m. and between 4: 00 and 6: 00 P.M. on a typical weekday. The peak
hours at both locations were the same, 7: 00 to 8: 00 a.m. and 4 : 00
to 5: 00 p.m. Figure 2 shows the peak hour turning volumes at these
two locations .
EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE
Level of Service (LOS) is a concept developed to quantify the
degree of comfort ( including such elements as travel time, number
of stops , total amount of stopped delay, and impediments caused by
other vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel through an
intersection or roadway segment . Recent research has determined
that average stopped delay per vehicle is the best available
measure of the LOS at a signalized intersection. As defined within
the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (Reference 1 ) , six grades are used
to denote the various LOS ; these six grades are described
qualitatively for signalized intersections in Table 1 .
Additionally, Table 2 identifies the relationship between level of
service and average stopped delay per vehicle. Using this
definition , a "D" LOS is generally considered to represent the
minimum acceptable design standard.
For signalized intersections , LOS defines the quality of the
traffic flow, but does not necessarily describe the overall design
adequacy of the intersection to accommodate the traffic volumes
being analyzed. As an example, a good LOS can be achieved even
when the volume/capacity ratio for the intersection exceeds 1 . 0 .
Similarly, there are conditions under which a poor LOS is achieved
even though the volume/capacity ratio for the intersection is well
below 1 . 0 . Therefore, all signalized intersection evaluations
contained in this report provide both the calculated LOS and the
calculated volume/capacity ratio for each intersection. Thus , the
reader is provided with a complete description of the expected
operating conditions for each intersection that is analyzed.
The calculation of LOS at an unsignalized intersection requires a
different approach. The 1985 Highway Capacity Manual includes a
methodology for calculating the LOS at two-way stop-controlled
intersections . For these unsignalized intersections , LOS is
defined differently than for signalized intersections in that it
is based upon the concept of "Reserve Capacity" ( i . e. , that portion
5
t
•
O
CG
yr
W anl'] 4�- IL Rh
Z a s \ VT
„4 ZI %\
N
N 3.V
/ .
.� o ` gym
(cf) ...-- N • (4/ . ¢
ii-- 468 hI 4
4`ife ,._?.
v 9 6
' ‘/0%° Oi l'°'S
Ogif) 14 *
VI
' .e_____ _S '1r
/ .
3S9//49
_ R. ,1. IPEAI< Nova — F/ G u I E E_
. IF Pl. 17e4 14 14002 . _ ZX/ s. T/e/G V 0 L. (J/11 d'S
b ,
TABLF} 1
LEVEL OF SERVICjjE DEFINITIONS
(SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS)
Level of
Service Traffic Flow Characteristics
A Very low average stopped delay, less than five seconds per
vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely
favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase.
Most vehicles do not stop at all . Short cycle lengths may
also contribute to low delay.
B Average stop delay is in the range of 5 . 1 to 15 . 0 seconds
per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression
and/or short cycle lengths . More vehicles stop than for
LOS A, causing ' higher levels of average delay.
C Average stopped delay is in the range of 15 . 1 to 25 . 0
seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from
fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths . Individual
cycle failures may begin to appear in this level . The
number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level ,
although many still pass through the intersection without
stopping.
D Average stopped delays are in the range of 25 . 1 to 40. 0
seconds per vehicle. The influence of congestion becomes
more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some
combination of unfavorable progression , long cycle length,
or high volume/capacity ratios . Many vehicles stop, and
the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines .
Individual cycle failures are noticeable.
E Average stopped delays are in the range of 40 . 1 to 60 . 0
seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit
of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally
indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths , and high
volume/capacity ratios . Individual cycle failures are
frequent occurrences .
F Average stop delay is in excess of 60 seconds per vehicle.
This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers .
This condition often occurs with oversaturation. It may
also occur at high volume/capacity ratios below 1 . 00 with
many individual cycle failures . Poor progression and long
cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such
high delay levels .
Note: A signal cycle failure is considered to occur when one or
more vehicles are forced to wait through more than one
green signal indication for a particular approach.
7
TABLE 2
LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Stopped Delay Per
Level of Service Vehicle (Sec)
A <= 5 . 0
B 5. 1 to 15 . 0
C 15 . 1 to 25 . 0
D 25 . 1 to 40. 0
E 40 . 0 to 60 . 0
F > 60. 0
8
of available hourly capacity that is not used) . A qualitative
description of the various service levels associated with an
unsignalized intersection is presented in Table 3. A quantitative
definition of LOS for an unsignalized intersection is presented in
Table 4.
The reserve capacity concept applies only to an individual traffic
movement or to shared lane movements . Once the capacity of all the
individual movements has been calculated and their LOS and expected
delays determined, an overall evaluation of the intersection can be
made. Normally, the movement having the worst LOS defines the
overall evaluation, but this may be tempered by engineering
judgement . An "E" LOS is generally considered to represent the
minimum acceptable design standard;.
Past experience with the unsignalized analysis procedure indicates
this methodology is very conservative in that it tends to
overestimate the magnitude of any potential problems that might
exist . This is especially true for minor street left turn movements .
Therefore, the results of any unsignalized intersection analysis
should be reviewed with this thought in mind.
The results of the existing LOS calculations at the two key
intersections considered in this study indicate the following.:
o Oakesdale Avenue/Grady Way
- a.m. peak : Delay = 26 . 5 seconds per vehicle
Volume/Capacity = 0 . 698
Level of Service = D
- p.m. peak: Delay = 32 . 2 seconds per vehicle
Volume/Capacity = 0 . 751
Level of Service = D
o Martin Luther Kinx way/68th Avenue
- a.m. peak: Reserve Capacity = 5
Level of Service = E
- p.m. peak: Reserve Capacity = —75
Level of Service = F
At the signalized intersection of Oakesdale Avenue and Grady Way,
the existing LOS is at the D level in both the a.m. and p.m. peak
hours . LOS D is generally considered to be acceptable for peak hour
operations in urban areas .
BACKGROUND LEVEL OF SERVICE
Traffic volumes in the site vicinity are constantly increasing due
to increased development in the area and due to more trips being
made by individuals residing in the region . Since the proposed
facility will not be completed and occupied until the Fall of 1990 ,
estimates of traffic growth between the present time and the time
of occupancy have been considered. Experience by the City of Renton
indicates that this type of traffic growth has been averaging
approximately 3 percent per year. Thus , the traffic volumes shown
9
•
TABLE 3
GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS FOR
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
LOS General Description
A - Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation
- Very seldom is there more than one vehicle in
the queue
B - Some drivers begin to consider the delay an
inconvenience
- Occasionally there is more than one vehicle in
the queue
C - Many times there is more than one vehicle in the
queue
- Most drivers feel restricted, but not
objectionably so
D - Often there is more than one vehicle in the queue
Drivers feel quite restricted
E - Represents a condition in which the demand is
near or equal to the probable maximum number of
vehicles that can be accommodated by the movement
- There is almost always more than one vehicle in
the queue
- Drivers find the delays to be approaching
intolerable levels
F - Forced flow
- Represents an intersection failure condition
that is caused by geometric and/or operational
constraints external to the intersection
10
TABLE 4
LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA
for
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Reserve Capacity. Level of Expected Delay to
(pcph) Service Minor Street Traffic
>400 A Little or no delay
300-399 B Short traffic delays
200-299 C Average traffic delays
100-199 D Long traffic delays
0- 99 E Very long traffic delays
* F
* When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane,
extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which
may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic
movements in the intersection . This condition usually
warrants improvement to the intersection.
•
11
in Figure 2 , for existing conditions have been increased by 2 percent
to account for traffic growth from now until the time of occupancy
of the proposed site (8 months ) . The resulting traffic volumes at
the two key intersections under consideration are shown in Figure 3 .
LOS was re-calculated based on these background traffic volumes . The
results of the analysis are shown below.
o Oakesdale Avenue/Grady Way
- a.m. peak: Delay = 27 . 0 seconds per vehicle
Volume/Capacity = 0 . 712
Level of Service = D
- p.m. peak: Delay = 33 . 1 seconds per vehicle
Volume/Capacity = 0 . 767
Level of Service = D
•
o Martin Luther King Way/68th Avenue
- a.m. peak: Reserve Capacity = 4
Level of service = E
p.m. peak: Reserve Capacity = -77
Level of Service = F
12
G3/vn -7oA .
c .;an6/� /— 'vn0ty PJfrPa •A/ 'b'
61//65s
;,
1/0
• h 4
0 ,C) '0 CI
q� c
i\qi)/(4
7-- Ai •
z.
X q °2/7(7) co . cT ,,,
.("3> IN /
0
CI
�� k _ . ('4
gdfjr.7, 2, hretov
... ..... 0 .4,7i,oz,s, CA -t. • .
z
'r c7-7-i,ob. 6ea E: iA
o
O
V\
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Morning and evening peak-hour trips , as well as daily trips ,
generated by the proposed development were analyzed as follows :
o The total number of future daily, morning peak hour, and
evening peak hour trips both in and out of the proposed
site were estimated for complete buildout of the site.
o Background a.m. and p.m. peak hour volumes were estimated
for the two key intersections for the time of anticipated
occupancy of the site in the Fall of 1990.
o Site-generated traffic predicted for weekday morning and
evening peak hours were assigned to the road network
serving the site and added to the background traffic
volumes .
o The movement of traffic to and from the Container
Corporation of America facility, adjacent to the proposed
site, was examined to obtain an estimate of trip
distribution patterns within the study area.
o Traffic demands at each of the two key intersections were
analyzed to identify capacity or level of service
deficiencies under assumed conditions after site occupancy
in the Fall of 1990 .
SITE GENERATED TRIPS
Estimates of total daily, a.m. peak hour, and p.m. peak hour driveway
volumes for the proposed facility were developed based on empirical
observations at similar distribution facilities located throughout
the United States . These empirical observations are summarized in
a standard reference manual published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (Reference 2) . Since a large part of the
proposed site will be occupied by the consolidation of identical
existing operations at other sites , it was possible to measure some
aspects of trip generation at these facilities in order to verify the
published rates .
Interviews with operators of existing operations to be moved to the
proposed sites were made. The interviews indicated that the primary
site user has 35 company vehicles that are used to distribute goods
from the warehouse to various outlets in the Seattle area.
Generally, these vehicles are loaded at night and are ready to be
dispatched early each morning. Records indicate that , on the
average, about 80 percent of these vehicles make one round trip
' to/from the warehouse each weekday. Company records also show the
number of truck arrivals each day during 1989 to the warehouses to
deliver large loads of goods . From this information, an estimate of
daily truck travel to/from the proposed site was made.
To verify the truck travel data from company records, field
observations were made at existing operations . The truck trip
' generation estimate made from records indicated a range of total
is
}
truck trips between 70 and 86 daily trips . Field observations
between the hours of 7 : 00 a.m. and 5: 00 p.m. resulted in a total of
86 total truck trips , which verifies the upper end of the estimate
made from company records .
Because all of the existing sites dp not include employee parking on-
site, it was not possible to make accurate field observations to
verify employee and visitor trips to these sites . However, estimates
of trip generation for general offices should provide a reasonably
accurate estimate of these trips . In addition, Kittelson and
Associates previously performed field studies of a site with similar
operations to the one currently under consideration, and found that
estimates based on employees in a general office matched observed
values for the p.m. peak hour (Reference 3) .
The Institute of Transportation Engineers ( ITE) trip generation rates
include a choice of alternative development parameters . In the case
of a distribution (warehousing) facility, the alternative rates
included are: trips per square foot of floor area, trips per
employee, and trips per acre. When specific plans are available, the
selection of either floor space or employees is usually made.
Calculations of trip generation for the proposed site were made using
both the ITE floor space and employee trip generation rates . The
results of these calculations were compared with field data collected
at the existing sites of operations to be moved to the proposed site.
This comparison indicates that trip generation based on floor space
results in trip generation totals much higher than those observed for
the existing operations . Trip generation based on employees is much
closer to observed results .
Since detailed information is available for the movement of trucks
to and from the existing sites , this data was combined with trip
generation rates for offices , based on the number of employees , to
arrive at a realistic estimate of trip generation for the proposed
facility. The resulting trip generation estimate is summarized in
Table 5 , along with trip generation estimates based on ITE trip
generation rates for floor space and employees .
TRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT
The distribution of site-generated trips for the proposed facility
onto the roadway system serving the site was estimated through an
examination of the movement of traffic to and from the adjacent site
occupied by the Container Corporation of America. As a result of
this review, it is estimated that 85 percent of the site-generated
trips will-- use Oakesdale Avenue to the south and east and the
remaining percent of site-generated traffic will use 68th Avenue
for site access . The site-generated trips were assigned to the two
key intersections based on this trip distribution pattern.
The site-generated trips were further assigned to these
intersections , based on existing turning movement ratios at the two
intersections . Site-generated trips are shown on Figure 4.
15
TABLE 5
ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION
BRUCE BLUME & COMPANY
PROPOSED RENTON SITE
ASSUMPTIONS :
Building A: Total Square Footage - 218, 300
Office Square Footage - 16, 000
Warehouse Square Footage - 202 , 300
Total Employees - 120
Drivers - 45
Office Employees - 25
Warehouse Employees - 7
Outside Sales - 43
Future work stations - 8
Building B : Total Square Footage - 49, 100
Office Square Footage - 0
Warehouse Square Footage - 49, 100
Total Employees - 17*
Drivers - 15*
Office Employees - 0
Warehouse Employees - 2*
Outside Sales - 0
* Estimate based on Building A.
TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES :
Based on Square Footage:
Building A :
Office: 347 trips per day, a.m. 42 , p.m. 44
Warehouse: 1 , 045 trips per day, a. m. 115 , p.m. 150
Total : 1 , 392 trips per day, a. m. 157, p. m. 194
Building B :
Warehouse: 240 trips per day, a.m. 28, p. m. 36
Total , Buildings A & B : 1 , 579 trips per day, a.m. 185 ,
p.m. 230
Based on Employees :
Building A:
Office: 211 trips per day, a.m. 23 , p.m. 22
Warehouse: 292 trips per day, a.m. 26, p.m. 31
Total : 413 trips per day, . a.m. 49, p.m. 53
Building B :
Warehouse: 66 trips per day, a.m. 9, p.m. 10
Total , Buildings A & B : 479 per day, a. m. 58, p .m. 63
16
TABLE 5 (CONTINUED)
ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION
BRUCE BLUME & COMPANY
PROPOSED RENTON SITE
Based on Combination Truck/Employees :
Building A:
Truck Trips : Container Corp. of America ( 1) 2
Large Trucks 22
Delivery Vans 64
Total Truck Trips (Daily) 88
Total Truck Trips (a.m. ) 15
Total Truck Trips (p.m. ) 6
Employee Trips: (2) 416 per day, a.m. 50 , p.m. 48
Total trips : 502 per day, a. m. 65 , p.m. 54
Building B :
Truck Trips : Large & Delivery (Daily) 28
Truck Trips : Large & Delivery (a. m. ) 5
Truck Trips : Large & Delivery (p.m. ) 2
Employee Trips : (3) 66 per day, a.m. 9, p. m. 10
Total Trips : 94 per day, a.m. 14 , p.m. 12
Total , Buildings A & B : 596 per day, a. m. 79, p.m. 66 (4)
( 1) Estimated truck activity to serve the 50 , 000 square feet
of floor space in Building A that is to be used for storage
only.
(2) Includes office workers , warehouse workers , drivers ,
outside sales , and visitors .
(3) Includes warehouse workers and drivers .
(4) This estimate of trip generation was used for the following
traffic impact analysis.
Note: Above calculations assume that only 25% of outside
sales staff comes to the office each * day (current
operation) .
17
O
.
J
co
V.
aril k---
Z a ,9 � ,if -4 5/3.4- -- Cl 3 3
04
. '‘3:). /////27—Av , 1 t ir
` N
0
� a
o
i fr.
l _.
,‹
......1
\ icg sz) .....__ _)..
kl 20_
,k -vilk 141.061
A Op
VJ I
,� 14
c o
/ .
_. R. '11. PEA1-‹ Novi _ . F/ GuR6
Pn. PE414 14ov2 _ S/7E- Gea6g4re9 TAF-/G
TOTAL VOLUMES WITH PROPOSED PROJECT
To evaluate the impacts of the additional site-generated traffic on
the two key intersections , the site-generated trips were added to the
background volumes shown in Figure 3 to arrive at total estimated
traffic volumes at these two locations following site occupancy in
the Fall of 1990. These volumes are shown on Figure 5.
LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT
A level of service analysis using total estimated traffic volumes
was made for the two key intersections under consideration.
Following is a summary of this analysis for the two key
intersections .
o Oakesdale Avenue/Grady Way
- a.m. peak: Delay = 27. 3 seconds per vehicle
Volume/Capacity = 0 . 738
Level of Service = D
- p.m. peak : Delay = 33 . 4 seconds per vehicle
Volume/Capacity = 0 . 786
Level of Service - D
o Martin Luther King Way/68th Avenue
- a.m. peak: Reserve Capacity = 1
Level of Service = E
- p.m. peak : Reserve Capacity = -83
Level of Service = F
SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
Conversations with Renton City staff have given . the understanding
that a traffic signal is currently warranted at the intersection of •
68th Avenue South and Martin. Luther King Way South. The results of
a.m. and p.m. peak hour turning movement counts made for this study
confirm that signal warrants are met based on the peak hour volume
warrant described in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(Reference 4) are met during the p.m. peak hour. During the p.m.
peak hour, 2106 vehicles approached the intersection on Martin Luther
King Way (both directions) and 138 vehicles approached the
intersection on 68th Avenue. The peak hour volume warrant is met
when at least 1800 and 100 vehicles approach an intersection with
geometries like the one under consideration.
la
.` 1
VN
0
J C'+
\S\
3,ali) .49/ ?—
wit/ ti t
•
1 *s-
W cull H 8 iS
Z. vl a s N 1 CO4 45/55
3aZ
/ Ii‘ 3• 3rV22
Je• !ay\ zz9
N
/14
/„.,..,.....
2/ q
• ems- A t
t
a
,6,!,,ir �.
___.'
�,- -.4- �\Je-�
V 9
el 'Vl
@ /4
edi
'Ir'''
- ---. .S
' b
i
._ i 1:1. /1. PE4K 11ova F/GUg 5
P /'?. 17E414 f-covlZ
iy
•
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the traffic impact analysis described in this report , it
is concluded that the roadway system within the study area can
accommodate the additional traffic volumes resulting from the
distribution functions envisioned for the proposed site. The peak
hour traffic volumes expected to be generated by the proposed site
have very little impact on the key intersections analyzed in this
study.
A traffic signal appears to be warranted at the intersection of
Martin Luther King Way and 68th Avenue, with or without the proposed
project . Following installation of the signal , all of the proposed
site access drives and nearby key intersections evaluated are
expected to operate within acceptable service levels upon occupancy
of the site in accordance with the proposed development plan.
21
ti
REFERENCES
1 . Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, Special
Report No. 209, 1985 .
2 . Institute of Transportation Engineers , Trip Generation Manual,
Fourth Edition, 1988.
3. Kittelson & Associates , Inc. , Traffic Report, Alaska
Distributors Company, Proposed Renton Facility, 1989.
4. U. S . Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for
Streets and Highways, 1988.
22
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 26, 1990
TO: Lenora Blauman, Community Development Department
FROM: Clinton E. Morgan, Transportation Systems Engineer C�"//
SUBJECT: Blume Distribution Facility
SA-112-89/601 Monster Road SW
Traffic Report by Rittelson & Associates
Attached, please find a revised cost estimate for Item 1 of
the Development Application Review which is enclosed for
your convenience.
The major changes are in the building square footage and
trip rate for the office space.
A copy of the TRAFFIC REPORT should be forwarded to King
County to allow any comments they may have regarding the
intersection of Martin Luther King Way/68th Avenue.
The intersection operates at E level in the AM peak and F
level in the PM peak with a reserve capacity of 83 . The
intersection does meet a traffic signal warrant.
If we can be of any further assistance, please let us know.
CEM:ps
Attachments
CC: John R. Ralston
Customer Service
CEM298
w , 0
Blume, Distribution Facility
SA-112-89
Revised 2-26-90
1. Proposed development is located in the Grady Way
Corridor Transportation Benefit Zone. Therefore, there
is a transportation impact assessment fee as follows:
BUILDING A
o Warehouse space - 202, 300
Trip rate 4.882/1 per sq. ft.
Cost per trip: $185. 00
202, 300 X 4 . 882/1000 = $987. 63
' ::987. 63 trips X $185. 00 = $ 182 ,711. 29
o Office space - 16, 000 sq. ft. *
Trip rate 11.404 (Office park)
Cost per trip: $152 . 00
* Note: ITE office general suggest using office
park when you have mixed use facility
16, 000 X 11.404/1000 = $182 .46
182 .46 trips X $152 . 00 = $ 27, 734 .53
TOTAL FEE BUILDING A: $ 210, 445. 82
BUILDING B
o Warehouse space - 49, 100 sq. ft.
Trip rate $4 . 882/1000 sq. ft.
Cost per trip: $185. 00
49, 100 sq. ft. X 4.882/1000 - $239 . 71 trips
,239.71 trips X $185. 00 = $ 44, 345/65
SUMMARY FOR ITEM 1:
Building A $210,445. 82
Building B $ 44, 345. 65
GRAND TOTAL FOR BLDG. A & B $254,791. 47
Revised Transportation Benefit Zone fee is $254 , 345. 65.
CEM:ps
CEM298A
{ I •
L
RENI. ,a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE'14RTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
' ECF-112-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 112-89
PROPONENT: Bruce Blume & Co.
PROJECT TITLE > ��-�viE .a'.,..,.
` J itme�v;.Distribu't3:on Facil it n.,,. .
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:'The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking_
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project
site is. vacant .and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use..
LOCATION:. c60'1'=Monste'ra r g<
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/29/89
`ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED' HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU D (iansportation �
DPOLICE DEPARTMENT 2 2 M2J
LS�L50 V LSD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION DEC 11 4 1989
PLANNING DIVISION I
SHORT RANGE
4 • ' LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS' TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
•
More information needed per attachment.
al d ae 9
e el,is. �-- I ivD .�
� I
•
•
•
•
(4111 020
DATE ;719
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
1
Blume Distribution Facility
' SA-112-89
601 Monster Road SW
1. The proposed development is located in the Grady Way Corridor
Transportation Benefit Zone. Therefore there is a transportation
impact assessment fee as follows:
Building A
a) Warehouse space - 269,000 sq. ft.
Trip rate 4.882 trips per 1000 sq. ft.
Cost per trip $ 185.00
269, 000 X 4.882/1000 = 1313.26 trips
1313 .26 trips X $ 185. 00/tr $ 242 , 953 . 10
b) Office space - 18, 000 sq. ft.I^
Trip rate 22.77 trips pdr �0.00 sq. ft.
Cost per trip $ 152.00 �/
18, 000 X 22 .77/1000 - 09.93 trips
409. 93 trips X $ 1 00/trip = $ 62 , 309. 36
$ 242 ,953 . 10. + , 309. 36 =
305 262 6 4.al f(e� �r Bldg. A
v 6
Building B
Warehouse s - 49 sq. ft.
Trip ra 4.882 rips per 1000 sq.. ft.
Cost pe t $ 18�. 0
4 , 1 0 X 4. 8 /1000 = 239.71 trips
239.71 trip .X $ 185. 00/trip = $ 44 , 345.65
$ 44 , 345.65 Total fee for Bldg. B
Summary for Item 1:
Building A $305,262.46
Building B $ 44,345. 65
Grand Total Bldg. A & B $349, 608. 11
2 . Truck hauling hours restricted during AM and PM peak hours:
a) AM peak hour 7 to 8:30 AM
b) PM peak hour 3 :30 to 6 PM
3 . Bonding for street cleaning required. Recommend $ 5, 000. 00
minimum amount. (Estimated minimum truck trips for fill only
9,900 trips) .
4. Traffic impact study required per transportation systems
guideline. Guidelines are available in the City's Traffic
Engineering office.
5. Curb, gutters and sidewalk plans required. In addition, street
improvement plans on Oakesdale Ave SW for off-site improvement.
6. Provide street lighting plans to City standards for Oakesdale Ave
SW as part of off-site improvements. Street light plans to
extend the length of property frontage to Oakesdale Ave SW.
7. Developer required to initiate undergrounding of the overhead
electrical and communication conductors (power & telephone)
abutting to Oakesdale Ave SW property frontage (also called main
distribution system for power & telephone) .
8 . Proper sight distances for all driveways must be confirmed by a
licensed engineer. Must meet AASHTD standards
Driveway width 30 feet passenger vehicle usage
Driveway width 40 feet large truck usage
9. Throat of driveway to be designed for high volume of traffic
entering and exiting. Driveway designed to meet ITE standards.
Detailed driveway drawing required showing throat distances, curb
radius and proposed turning lanes from Oakesdale Ave SW.
Note: Oakesdale Ave SW will be relatively high speed and high
volume when fully developed. This should be considered when
designing driveways.
10. Developer to establish a commuter information center for transit
service, ride match service, and van pools.
BUSH, ROED&HITCHINGS, INC.
2009 Minor Avenue East
Seattle.WashIngton 98102
Area 206/323-4144
Fax 206/323-7135
February 9, 1990
Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Chief, Current Planning Division
City of Renton Planning Department
200 South Mill Street
Renton, WA 98055
Re: Blume Distribution Facility (Container Corporation of America)
Dear Mr. Erickson:
Enclosed are legal descriptions and a map for a proposed segregation of
the above site into four parcels. All parcels will contain no less than
five acres each.
Please review the material at your earliest convenience and furnish us
with a letter indicating that the proposed segregation does not violate
the present subdivision ordinance of the City of Renton. We will need to
furnish a copy of the letter to the County Assessor.
Sincerely,
Arthur L. Hitchings
ALH/cd
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Jim Garrison, Bruce Blume & Company
CIVIL ENGINEERS/LAND SURVEYORS
_ TOTAL PARCEL: .De"ED DESc,eipr/oAi AssE�scuz? 7;4)4 LOT 8
BEGINNING AT IRON BOLT MARKING THE CENTER OF SECTION 24 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 0°03'30" WEST,
2622.11 FEET TO QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTION 13 AND 24, IN SAID TOWNSHIP AND
RANGE; THENCE SOUTH 89°34 '43" WEST, 1137 . 00 FEET , MORE OR LESS , TO THE
WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, (NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD) AND THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID
WESTERLY MARGIN, 1740.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF
THE NORTHERN PACIFIC BELT LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY AND
NORTHERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF LAND
CONVEYED TO CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY (NOW CHICAGO,
MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY) FOR ITS REVISED WYE LINE,
2475.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH BANK OF BLACK RIVER IN SECTION 13,
SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SOUTH BANK, 85.00 FEET, MORE OR
LESS , TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID COUNTY ROAD NO . 8 ; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID ROAD, 1450.00 FEET, MORE OR
LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
(BEING ALL THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1, 5 AND 6, SECTION 24 AND THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24, AND GOVERNMENT
LOTS 5 AND 6, IN SECTION 13 AND OF THE BED OF LAKE SHOWN ON GOVERNMENT PLAT,
ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
LYING BETWEEN COUNTY ROAD NO. 8 AND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF NORTHERN PACIFIC
RAILWAY COMPANY AND CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY);
EXCEPT PORTION THEREOF, IF ANY, WITHIN THE BED AND SHORES OF THE BLACK RIVER
AS THEY WERE SITUATED WHEN SAID RIVER CEASED TO BE A NAVIGABLE STREAM;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24 , WHICH IS SOUTH
87°29'26" EAST 1156.77 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH
2°30'34" WEST 916.42 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 53°42'00"
EAST., 445 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF MONSTER ROAD; THENCE
ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN SOUTH 18°34'04" WEST 31.37 FEET TO A POINT ON A
CURVE FROM WHICH THE RADIAL CENTER BEARS NORTH 71°25'56" WEST 256.48 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST,
128.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47°22'04" WEST 121.88 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE
FROM WHICH THE RADIAL CENTER BEARS SOUTH 42°37'56" EAST 250.37 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST 91.01 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID MARGIN NORTH 48°15'O1" WEST 420.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH
8°59' 17" EAST 125.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46°14' 18" EAST 219.70 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
\•
3 1990
A -i
TOTAL PARCEL CONT D
ALSO EXCEPT A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP
23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 29°51'
WEST 114.7 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66°21' EAST 153.9 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 66°57' EAST
TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND
PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL
AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY 108 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT
ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF TRACT 33, RENTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENT, RECORDS
OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF
TRACT 33, 33 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8
(KNOWN AS MONSTER ROAD); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN OF
COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, 104 FEET, MORE OR LESS , TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH
74°13' 19" EAST, FROM A POINT WITHIN SAID TRACT OF LAND WHICH IS LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF A PERMANENT EASEMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING
NO. 7202010402 AND GRANTED TO KING COUNTY FOR THE P-1 DRAINAGE CHANNEL,. SAID
POINT BEING DESCRIBED BY WASHINGTON STATE LAMBERT GRID COORDINATES (NORTH
ZONE) N 176, 376.52, E 1, 650, 378.61; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG
SAID WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 300 FEET, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 25°21'49" EAST, AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 50.74 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°13' 19" WEST 68.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
83°41'02" WEST 60.83 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 667.96 FEET THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 15°46'41" WEST AN ARC DISTANCE
OF 108.45 FEET, MORE OR LESS , TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO,
MILWAUKEE , ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 24 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
RENTON, WASHINGTON
BRH JOB NO. 89219.04
FEBRUARY 7, 1990
ALH/SURV. 34
ROED & HITCHINGS, INC.
•
PARCEL 1:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 24,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN: KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4
EAST, W.M. , ALL IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24, IN SAID TOWNSHIP
AND RANGE, THENCE NORTH 87°26'48"WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER 1214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES
MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH
32°29'51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 85.34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO
THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 139.14
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 1°24'51" EAST ALONG SAID
WESTERLY MARGIN 268.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 02°33'12" WEST 115.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88°37'17" WEST 105.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°22'40" WEST 887.90
FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST. AS CONVEYED TO THE
CITY OF RENTON BY DEED UNDER RECORDER'.S NO. 8702100643, RECORDS OF SAID
COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88°02'28" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 16.02 FEET;
THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 524.90 FEET AND ALONG. SAID
SOUTHERLY MARGIN 194.06 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°45'53" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY
MARGIN 147.08 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 842.73
FEET AND ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 81.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65°13'10" EAST
ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 257.10 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF 72ND AVENUE
SOUTHWEST AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDER'S
NO. 8702100643 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 70.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
24°46'50" WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 24.57 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE
LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 180.00 FEET AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 82.35 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 1°05'23" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 81.81 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 449,985 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
//"(`'"4.1 BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
fef0 L HI 1// RENTON, WASHINGTON
� • m '' ' w BRH JOB NO. 89219.04
;4 Ak' / MARCH 22, 1990
ALH/SURV. 34
6
;`�;a;' ;'•.;,Y i. cyan
•
BU`; ROED & HITCHINGS, INC.
PARCEL 2:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 24 ,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4
EAST, W.M. , ALL IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24, IN SAID TOWNSHIP
AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER 1,214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 3, CHARLES
MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH
32°29'51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 85.34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO
THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET, AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
139.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH O1°24'51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 268.00
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02°33'12" WEST
115.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°37'17"
WEST 105.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°22'40" WEST 437.90 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°03'09" WEST 283.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54°28' 10"
WEST 490.45 FEET TO. THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL
AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY'; THENCE NORTH 28°11'33" WEST ALONG
SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 115.75 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 411.73 FEET AND ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 57.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH
20°11'33" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 156.01 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO
THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 523.68 FEET AND ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 419.12
FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 667.96 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF
WHICH BEARS NORTH 6°57'18" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 102.86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 83°41'02" EAST 60.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74°13' 19" EAST 47.60 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD SOUTHWEST,
SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 238.99 'FEET, THE RADIUS POINT
OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 17°19'04" EAST; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND
SOUTHERLY MARGIN 80.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY
MARGIN 470.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°56'51" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN
10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'09" EAST ALONG SAIDSOUTHERLY MARGIN 26.53 FEET
TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 1°22'40" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 1°22'40" EAST 450.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 450,000 •SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
//// 'r" '" BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
�'�� �0. ' f"r44: RENTON, WASHINGTON
���� ' ~ BRH JOB NO. 89219.04
' GF 1
•
MARCH 22, 1990
I. 0 ( ` ALH/BURN. 34
4 •
_ 7F±li�ly 7C�n,
2'i`; / . 14,y0
BUS. ., .ROED & HITCHINGS, INC.
PARCEL 3:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24., TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE
4 EAST, W.M. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24 IN SAID TOWNSHIP
AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER 1214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES
MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST; THENCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
85.34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET A
DISTANCE OF 139.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°24',51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
268.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2°33' 12" WEST 115.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST
95.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°37'17" WEST 105.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4°58' 17"
EAST 410=.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN
DEED FILED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8606190933, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE
NORTH 46°16'56" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE 202.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
53°39'22" EAST ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 44.5.21 FEET TO THE
WESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG
SAID WESTERLY MARGIN TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 310,000 SQUARE
FEET, MORE OR LESS.
�R H
`O W 4' BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
4� OF _ S;, RENTON, WASHINGTON
`" 1% BRH JOB NO. 89219.04
FEBRUARY 7, 1990
$ ALH/SURV. 34
`'%p''"L Li 1';, SjJ;,i'�
I" i 1i trti TON
"ir='iRr 19;lli
•
BUS. _ - COED & HITCHINGS, INC.
PARCEL 4: •
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE
4 EAST, W.M. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24 IN SAID TOWNSHIP
AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER 1214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES
MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST; THENCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
85.34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET A
DISTANCE OF 139.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°24'51" EAST ALONG- SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
268.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2°33' 12"
WEST 115.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05' 34" WEST 95.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
88°37 ' 17" WEST 105.38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH
1°22'43" WEST 437.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°03'09" WEST 283.04 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 54°28' 10" WEST 490.45 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO, •
MILWAUKEE , ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT—OF—WAY; THENCE
SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 1610.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY
MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE
HAVING A RADIUS OF 250. 37 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH
58°59'44" EAST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY MARGIN 250.58
FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED FILED
UNDER RECORDER' S NO. 8606190933 , RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH
48°12 ' 23" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 420. 25 FEET; THENCE NORTH
9°O1'55" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 125.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH
46°16'56" EAST ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 17.69 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 4°58' 17" WEST 410.23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING
612,557 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
orrrr.L HI�.dr BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
ff 4`2, ��. , RENTON, WASHINGTON
�SS42,,0 �j { BRH JOB NO. 89219.04
,rcr.
,` MARCH 22, 1990
�� ` ALH/SURV. 34
ys AlLM
t?: zi4 >kGN
•
.• r
10/1V-- Yle641
•
START
COORDINATE FILE:J89219 LENGTH = 504 POINTS; TIME ON FILE: 12 16 43
BLUME-CONTAINER CORP tint JOB #332 7S47 S-- Ant#tt##t#tt#►t COGO #tt######t### /!J
FROM TYPE BEARING DISTANCE TO NORTHING EASTING ELEVATION
START 286 -461.34046 1,546.78624 •
286 INV NW 53 39 22 445.21 287 -197,49550 1,188.18091 •
287 INV SW 46 16 56 219.70 290 -349.33165 1,029.39213
290 INV SW 9 01 55 125.00 288 -472;78177 1,009.76899
288 INV SE 48 12 23 420.25 289 -752.85710 1,323.08651
RADIUS PT 258 -863.94748 1,547.46440
DELTA- 57 20 41 R= 250.37 A= 250,58 C= 240.25 T= 136.92
P.C. TO P,T.
289 INV SE 2 19 58 240.26 291 -992.91428 1,332.86547
291 INV NW 66 09 33 57.38 292 -969.72144 1,280:38160
RADIUS PT 259 -23.17329 1,698.66514
DELTA 27 01 59 R= 1034.85 A= 488.26 C= 483.74 T= 248,76
P.C. TO P.T.
292 INV NW 52 38 32 483.74 293 -676,19272 895.87506
RADIUS PT 316. 10,79859 1,740.43936
DELTA 5 11 57 R= 1088.69 A= 98.79 C= 98.76 T= 49.43
P.C. TO P.T.
293 INV NW 36 31 35 98.76 294 -596.83344 837.09599
294 INV NW 33 55 36 776.20 295 47.22054 403.87444
295 INV NW 28 11 33 305.79 302 316.73323 259.40842
RADIUS PT 303 511.24906 622.29295
DELTA 8 00 00 R= 411.73 A= 57.49 C= 57.44 T= 28.79
P,C. TO P.T.
302 INV NW 24 11 33 57.44 301 369.13001 235.86861
301 INV NW 20 11 33 156.01 300 515.55547 182.01630
RADIUS PT 304 696.31690 673.50999
DELTA 45 51 23 R= 523.68 A= 419.12 C= 408.03 T= 221.51
P.C, TO P.T.
300 INV NE 2 44 09 408.03 299 923.11639 201.49158 "
RADIUS PT 282 1,586.16114 120.60761
DELTA- 8 49 23 R= 667.96 A= " 102.86 C= 102.76 T= 51.53
P.C. TO P.T. - t:
299 INV NE 78 38 00 102.76 298 943.36905 302,23604 ' `
298 INV NE 83 41 02 '60.83 297 950.06119 362,69681 :.,. ;,<..., •`',
297 INV NE 74 13 19 47.60 296 963.00419 408.50334 s
RADIUS PT 305 1,191.16029 479.64316
P.G. TO P,T.-
296' INV,SE 82 18 53 79.98 "° 952.30834 487,76493
269 INV NE 88 03 09 470.93 968.31230 958.42292
270 INV SE 1 56 51 10.00 271 958.31808 958.76275
271 INV NE BB 03 09 42.55 343 959.76409 1,001.2881E
RADIUS PT 325 435.16728 1,019,12624
DELTA 21 1058 R= 524.90 A= 194.06 C= 192.96 T= 98.15
P.C. TO P.T.
343 INV SE 81 21 22 192.96 342 930.76405 1,192.05354
342 INV SE 70 45 53 147.08 341 882,30883 1,330.92261
RADIUS PT 326 86.62533 1,053.28685
DELTA 5 32 43 R= 842.73 A= 81.56 C= 81.53 T= 40,B1
P.C.' TO P.T. -
341 INV SE 67-59 32 81.53 340 851.75653 1,406.51214
340 INV SE 65 13 10 257.10 335 743,99461 1,639.93831
RADIUS PT 336 703.13822 1,621.07683
DELTA 90 00 00 R= 45,00 A= 70.69 C= 63.64 T= 45.00
P.C. TO P.T.
335 INV SE 20 13 10 63.64 337 684,27674 1,661.93322
337 INV SW 24 46 50 24,57 339 661,96915 1,651,63486
RADIUS PT 333 586.52323 1,815.06042
DELTA- 26 12 45 R= 180.00 A= 82.35 C= 81.63 T= 41.91
P.C. TO P.T.
339 INV SW 11 40 27 81.63 338 . 582.02512 1,635.11663
338 INV SE 1 05 23 81.81 283 500.23303 1,636,67240
283, INV SE 1 24 51 601.75 284 -101.33623 1,651.52326
RADIUS PT 257 -107.66599 1,395.12138
DELTA 20 00 00 R= 256.48 A= 89,53 C= 89.07 T= 45.22
P.C. TO P.T.
284 INV SW 8 35 09 89.07 285 -189.41257 1,638.22524
285 INV SW 18 35 09 286.89 286 -461.34046 1,546.78624
AREA 1822542,95 SF 41.839E ACRES
•
•
Mk-CU-
•
START 346 71.58079
1,006.62780
346 INV NW 1 22 40 887.90 344 959.21967 985.27743
344 INV NE 88 03 09 16.02 343 959.76409 1,001.28818
RADIUS PT 325 435.16728 1,019.12624
DELTA 21 10 58 R= 524.90 A= 194.06 C= 192,96 T= 98.15
P.C. T0,P.T.
343 INV SE 81 21 22 192.96 342 930.76405 .1,192.05354
342 INV SE 70 45 53 147.08 341 882.30883 1,330.92261
RADIUS PT 326 86.62533 1,053,28685
DELTA 5 32 43 R= 842.73 A= 81.56 C= 81.53 T= 40.81
P.C. TO'P.T,
341 INV SE 67 59 32 81.53 340 851.75653 1,406.51214
340 INV SE 65 13 10 257.10 335 743.99461 1,639,93831
RADIUS PT 336 703,13822 1,621.07683
DELTA 90 00 00 R= 45.00 A= 70.69 C= 63.64 T= 45.00
P.C. TO P.T.
335 INV SE 20 13 10 63.64 337 684.27674 1,661.93322
337 INV SW 24 46 50 24.57 339 661.96915 1,651.63486
RADIUS PT 333 586.52323 1,815.06042
DELTA- 26 12 45 R= 180.00 A= 82.35 C= 81,63 T= 41.91
P.C. TO P,T,
339 .INV SW 11 40 27 81.63 338 582.02512 1,635.11663
338 INV SE 1 05 23 81,81 283 500.23303 1,636.67240
283 INV SE 1 24 51 268,00 347 232.31466 1,643.28646
347 INV SW 88 35 09 436.55 348 221.54088 1,206,86943
348 INV SW 2 33 12 115.03 349 106.62509 1,201.74492
349 INY SW 70 05 34 • 95.47 350 74.11607 1,111.97510
350 INV SW 88 37 17 105.38 346 71.58079 1,006.12780
AREA 449985.91 SF 10.3303 ACRES
•
4-)e. CEL
START 352 509.35417 996.09804 •
352 INV SW Be 03 09 283.04 354 499.73557 713,22622
354 INV SW 54 28 10 490.45 353 214.71520 314,09281
353 INV NW 28 11 33 • 115.75 302 316.73323 259.40842
RADIUS'PT 303 511.24906 - 622.29295
DELTA ; 8 00 00 R= 411.73 A= 57.49 C= 57.44 T= 28.79
P.C. TO P.T.
302 INV NW 24 11 33 57.44 301 369.13001 235.86861
301 INV NW 20 11 33 156.01 300 515:55547 182.01630
RADIUS PT 304 696.31690 673.50999
DELTA . 45 51 23 R= 523.68 A= 419.12 C= 408.03 T= 221.51
P.C. TO P.I.
300 INV NE 2 44 09 '408.03 299 923.11639 201.49158
RADIUS, PT 282 1,586.16114 120.60761
DELTA- 8 49 23 R= 667.96 A= 102.86 C= 102.76 T= 51.53
P.C. T4 P.T.
299 INV NE 78 38 00 102.76 298 943.36905 302.23604
298 INV NE 83 41 02 60.83 297 950.06119 - 362.69681
297 INV NE 74 13 19 47.60 296 963.00419 408.50334
RADIUS' PT 305 1,191.16029 479.64316
DELTA 19 15 55 R= 238.99 A= B0.36 C= 79.98 T= 40.56'
P.C. TP P.T.
296 INV SE 82 18 53 79.98 269 952.30834 . 487.76493
• 269 INV NE 88.03 09 470.93 270 968.31230 958.42292
270. INV SE 1 56 51 10.00 271 958.31808 - 958.76275
271 INV NE 88 03 09 26,53 '344 959.21967 985.27743
344 INV SE 1 22 40 450.00 352 509.35417 996.09804
AREA '450002.65 SF 10.3306 ACRES
Ir
I `
START 346 71.58079 1,006.62780
346 INV NE 88 37 17 105.38 350 74.11607 1,111.97510
350 INV NE 70 05 34 95.47 349 106.62509 1,201.74492
349 INV NE 2 33 12 115.03 348 221.54088 1,206.86943
348 INV NE 88 35 09 436.55 347 232.31466 11,643.28646
347 INV SE 1 24 51 333,75 284 -101.33623 1,651.52326
RADIUS PT 257 -107.66599 1,395.12138
DELTA 1 20 00 00 R= 256.48 A= 89.53 C= 89..07 T= 45.22
P.C. T . P.T.
284 INV SW 8 35 09 89.07 285 -189,41257 1,638.22524
285 INV SW 18 35 09 286.89 286 -461.34046 1,546.78624
286 INV NW 53 39 22 445.21 287 -197.49550 1,188.18091
287 INV SW 46 16 56 202.01 345 -337.10597 1,042.17763
345 INV NW 4 58 17 410,23 346 71.58079 1,006.62780
AREA 309996.90 SF 7.1165 ACRES
i
START 346 71.58079 1,006.62780
346 INV NW 1 22 40 437.90 352 509.35417 996.09804
352 INV SW 88 03 09 283.04 354 499.73557 713.22622
354 INV SW 54 28 10 490.45 353 214.71520 314.09281
353 INV SE 28 11 33 190,04 295 47.22054 403.87444
295 INV SE 33 55 36 776.20 294 -596.83344 837.09599
RADIUSIPT 316 10,79859 1,740.43936
DELTAH 5 11 57 R= 1088.69 A= 98.79 C= 98.76 T= 49.43
P.C. TO P,T, -
294 INV SE 36 31 35 98.76 293 -676,19272 895.87506
RADIUS'PT 259 -23.17329 1,698,66514
DELTA-1 27 01 59 R= 1034.85 A= 488.26 C= 483.74 T= 248.76
P.C.. TO P.T.
293 INV SE 52 38 32 483.74 292 -969.72144 1,280.38160
292 INV SE 66 09 33 57.38 291 -992.91428 1,332.86547
RADIUS1PT 258 -863.94748 1,547.46440
DELTA 57 20 41 R= 250.37 A= 250.59 C= 240,26 T= 136.92
P.C. T0 P,T,
291 INV NW 2 19 58 . 240.26 289 -752.85710 1,323.08651
289 INV NW 48 12 23 420,25 288 -472.78177 1,009.76899
288 INV NE 9. 01 55 125,00 290 -349,33165 1,029.39213
290 INV NE 46 16 56 17,69 345 -337.10597 1,042.17763
345 INV NW 4 58 17 410.23 346 71.58079 1,006.62780
AREA 612557.46 SF 14.0624 ACRES
� 1 f
/
/ BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, I —Yc( o�
Engineers/Land Surveyor \ \ V LIEUM OF in'
2009 Minor Avenue East
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98102 •
DATE JOB NO.
(206) 323-4144 2-09-90 89719-4
ATTENTION
Jerry Lind
RE:
TO City of Renton Planning Blume & Company
.,::+i
FE3i21990
2 l
L L5 L: U
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached 0 Under separate cover via CA/ the following items:
❑ Shop drawings cYPrints 0 Plans 0 Samples ❑ Specifications
O Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 letter and legals for distribution to Don Erickson
(Parcels 1 through 4, total parcel description)
\13 drawing
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
O For approval ❑ Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO
SIGNED: CD for Art Hitchings
PRODUCT 240-3 /A B/Inc,Groton,Mass.01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
BUSH, ROED& HITCHINGS, INc.
2009 Minor Avenue East
Seattle,Washington 98102 I
FEB i21990
Area 206/323-4144 n
Fax 206/323-7135 !Fax I'll
l
February 9, 1990
Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Chief, Current Planning Division
City of Renton Planning Department
200 South Mill Street
Renton, WA 98055
Re: Blume Distribution Facility (Container Corporation of America)
Dear Mr. Erickson:
Enclosed are legal descriptions and a map for a proposed segregation of
the above site into four parcels. All parcels will contain no less than
five acres each.
Please review the material at your earliest convenience and furnish us
with a letter indicating that the proposed segregation does not violate
the present subdivision ordinance of the City of Renton. We will need to
furnish a copy of the letter to the County Assessor.
Sincerely,
L, r
Arthur/ . Hutchings .
ALH/cd
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Jim Garrison, Bruce Blume & Company
CIVIL ENGINEERS/LAND SURVEYORS
I -
BU5H, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC.
PARCEL 4:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE
4 EAST, W.M. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24 IN SAID TOWNSHIP
AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER 1214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES
MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST; THENCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
85.34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET A
DISTANCE OF 139.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°24'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
268.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2°33'12"
WEST 115. 03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05' 34" WEST 95.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
88°37 ' 17" WEST 105. 38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH
1°22°43" WEST 437.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°03'09" WEST 283.04 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 54°28' 10" WEST 490.44 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO,
MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE
SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 1610.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY
MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD, SAID POINT BEING ON A NON-
TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.37 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS
NORTH 66°59'43" EAST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY MARGIN
250.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED
FILED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8606190933, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH
48°12°23" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 420. 25 FEET; THENCE NORTH
9°O1'55" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 125.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH
46°16°56" EAST ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 17.69 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 4°58'17" WEST 410.23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING
612,566 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
L.HI re tp , BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
.0 4 W S i A RENTON, WASHINGTON
Q: O lfriA* BRH JOB NO. 89219.04
4� = ,i �` I FEBRUARY 7 1990
EOi a ALH/SURV. 34
-‘41 , - 4- , ,..,44
s' _• slphAl LAND SlD¢
0,
BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC.
TOTAL PARCEL CONT'D
ALSO EXCEPT A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP
23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 29°51'
WEST 114.7 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66°21' EAST 153.9 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 66°57' EAST
TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND
PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL
AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY 108 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT
ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF TRACT 33, RENTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENT, RECORDS
OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF
TRACT 33, 33 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8
(KNOWN AS MONSTER ROAD); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN OF
COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, 104 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH
74°13'19" EAST, FROM A POINT WITHIN SAID TRACT OF LAND WHICH IS LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF A PERMANENT EASEMENT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING
NO. 7202010402 AND GRANTED TO KING COUNTY FOR THE P-1 DRAINAGE CHANNEL, SAID
POINT BEING DESCRIBED BY WASHINGTON STATE LAMBERT GRID COORDINATES (NORTH
ZONE) N 176, 376.52, E 1, 650, 378.61; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG
SAID WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 300 FEET, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 25°21'49" EAST, AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 50.74 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°13'19" WEST 68.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
83°41'02" WEST 60.83 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS
OF 667.96 FEET THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 15°46'41" WEST AN ARC DISTANCE
OF 108.45 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO,
MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 24 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
RENTON, WASHINGTON
BRH JOB NO. 89219.04
FEBRUARY 7, 1990
ALH/SURV. 34
BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC.
PARCEL 1:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 24,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4
EAST, W.M. , ALL IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24, IN SAID TOWNSHIP
AND RANGE, THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER 1214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES
MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH
32°29'51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 85.34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO
THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 139.14
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 1°24'51" EAST ALONG SAID
WESTERLY MARGIN 268.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 02°33'12" WEST 115.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88°37'17" WEST 105.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°22'43" WEST 887.90
FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST AS CONVEYED TO THE
CITY OF RENTON BY DEED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8702100643, RECORDS OF SAID
COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88°02'28" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 16.02 FEET;
THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 524.90 FEET AND ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY MARGIN 194.06 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°46'34" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY
MARGIN 147.08 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 842.73
FEET AND ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 81.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 65°13'51" EAST
ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 259.10 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF 72ND AVENUE
SOUTHWEST AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDER'S
NO. 8702100643 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A
RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 70.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
24°46'09" WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 24.57 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE
LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 180.00 FEET AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 82.35 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0°20'37" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 81.08 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 317,772 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
. HiT�/f�,,;�� BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
�. OFiV1V'� RENTON, WASHINGTON
lot., A BRH JOB NO. 89219.04
P. ''�' ' o FEBRUARY 7, 1990
,, z > ALH/SURV. 34
el J Pi'
'0 )
41F �F'48TER�0�'a�?
��w LAt+9 5�111 A�
I -
BUE ROED & HITCHINGS, INC.
PARCEL 2:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 24,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4
EAST, W.M. , ALL IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24, IN SAID TOWNSHIP
AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER 1,214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 3, CHARLES
MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH
32°29'51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 85.34 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENT
CURVATURE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ARC OF 31°04'57", AN ARC LENGTH
139. 14 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 30 FEET WESTERLY, PERPENDICULAR TO SAID
CENTERLINE OF STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH O1°24 ' 51" EAST, ALONG SAID
WESTERLY MARGIN, 268.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 02°33'12" WEST 115.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88°37' 17" WEST 105.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°22°43" WEST 437.90
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°03'09" WEST 283.04 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 54°28' 10" WEST 490.44 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO,
MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE NORTH
28°11'33" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 115.75 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO
THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 411.73 FEET AND ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 57.49
FEET; THENCE NORTH 20°11'33" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 156.01 FEET;
THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 523.68 FEET AND ALONG SAID
EASTERLY MARGIN 419.12 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS
OF 667.96 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 6°57' 18" WEST; THENCE
EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 102.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 83°41'02" EAST 60.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74°13'19" EAST 47.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF
CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD SOUTHWEST, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE HAVING A
RADIUS OF 238.99 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 17°19'04" EAST;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHERLY MARGIN 80.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH
88°03'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 470.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°56'51"
EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'09" EAST ALONG
SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 26.53 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 1°22'43" WEST
FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 1°22'43" EAST 450.00 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 450,000 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
60\O L Hire, ..; • BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
f.tS-4,0V ' ; RENTON, WASHINGTON
BRH JOB NO. 89219.04
o_ y FEBRUARY 7, 1990
,J , ALH/SURV. 34
- a
BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC.
PARCEL 3:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE
4 EAST, W.M. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24 IN SAID TOWNSHIP
AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER 1214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES
MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST; THENCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
85.34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET A
DISTANCE OF 139.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°24'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
268.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2°33'12" WEST 115.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST
95.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°37'17" WEST 105.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4°58'17"
EAST 410.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN
DEED FILED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8606190933, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE
NORTH 46°16'56" EAST. ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE 202.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
53°39'22" EAST ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 445.21 FEET TO THE
WESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG
SAID WESTERLY MARGIN TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 310,000 SQUARE
FEET, MORE OR LESS.
0 ' N) HI To 4' , BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
6; � W S,y RENTON, WASHINGTON
A. 4M.1; BRH JOB NO. 89219.04
' 1 c FEBRUARY 7, 1990
ALH/SURV. 34
s��Qr 5�;.♦t�9
• • ,
BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INc.
TOTAL PARCEL:
BEGINNING AT IRON BOLT MARKING THE CENTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 0°03'30" WEST,
2622. 11 FEET TO QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTION 13 AND 24, IN SAID TOWNSHIP AND
RANGE; THENCE SOUTH 89°34 '43" WEST, 1137.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS , TO THE
WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, (NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD) AND THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID
WESTERLY MARGIN, 1740.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF
THE NORTHERN PACIFIC BELT LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY AND
NORTHERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF LAND
CONVEYED TO CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY (NOW CHICAGO,
MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY) FOR ITS REVISED WYE LINE,
2475.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH BANK OF BLACK RIVER IN SECTION 13,
SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SOUTH BANK, 85.00 FEET, MORE OR
LESS , TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID COUNTY ROAD NO. 8; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID ROAD, 1450.00 FEET, MORE OR
LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
(BEING ALL THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1, 5 AND 6, SECTION 24 AND THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF. THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24, AND GOVERNMENT
LOTS 5 AND 6, IN SECTION 13 AND OF THE BED OF LAKE SHOWN ON GOVERNMENT PLAT,
ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
LYING BETWEEN COUNTY ROAD NO. 8 AND THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF NORTHERN PACIFIC
RAILWAY COMPANY AND CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY);
EXCEPT PORTION THEREOF, IF ANY, WITHIN THE BED AND SHORES OF THE BLACK RIVER
AS THEY WERE SITUATED WHEN SAID RIVER CEASED TO BE A NAVIGABLE STREAM;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24, WHICH IS SOUTH
87°29'26" EAST 1156.77 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH
2°30'34" WEST 916.42 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 53°42'00"
EAST, 445 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF MONSTER ROAD; THENCE
ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN SOUTH 18°34'04" WEST 31.37 FEET TO A POINT ON A
CURVE FROM WHICH THE RADIAL CENTER BEARS NORTH 71°25'56" WEST 256.48 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST,
128.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47°22'04" WEST 121.88 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE
FROM WHICH THE RADIAL CENTER BEARS SOUTH 42°37'56" EAST 250.37 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST 91.01 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID MARGIN NORTH 48°15'O1" WEST 420.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH
8°59'17" EAST 125.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46°14'18" EAST 219.70 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
t\ -
•
Trza��Pic Report
XtHHHNIBIIHNINNNi4Ni111NiNH11W111111NNHMM11H 1M1141MIMIXHHNIHi1XNINININNWIHHIHIIXIHNIN1111HHIHIININN11N11NIHINHNHNI111111 1101NNXNHIINNNNX11111111HHHIHNIIHWNIHNINYIHHHNUIHXNIIOMNI IHHNIHXNIHIHIM1NHIHHIHHHHINNIXNNNIIHIHIIIHIINHINIMMIli1
IMPS4111WN444411NWIIUI4UNWW14UI4W{411W144RIIU411UIMIIIII14411W4W4401WY444WWI1.11.141^•1^11Wltl\I4WWry4411441444414\1411 M4WN414WWIMWI4 MUSI YWY4WII MI.1YIW444W4U411W4U14411l1.11.Ig1..11111m W4\\4NU4 1111 4 111U441111
•
BR LICE' BL UME 8c COMPANY
I
1='101::'0SEr> RENTON FACILITY
•
•
•
FXvMHNHNXNNNNtlI11HXXHNINININIXIiNIHXNNIINIHiIHiiHIHtHIHHN HIINH4HIIIXHHHIXIINHHNNHNHHNHHXIHIHHINNHIINNNHHNIIIIHNIXtl1111HIHI1IIHNXXNINHHHNINNINNIN11HH11NXNWHiXINiHIHNHNtlHIHN1INIHXHHHIIXIHNNHHHNIIitHIHHXIHff11NXNHNIINNiXHHtlHNHHNINHHHHH1Nf
Ki t t e1 son 8s _A. IS 1E1 t e s
February, 1990
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1
Scope of the Report 1
Project Description 1
Existing Land Use 3
Existing Transportation Facilities 3
Transit Service 4
Planned Transportation Improvements 4
EXISTING CONDITIONS 5
Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 5
Existing Level of Service 5
Background Level of Service 9
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 14
Site Generated Trips 14
Trip Distribution/Assignment 15
Total Volumes With Proposed Project 19
Level of Service With Project 19
Signal Warrant Analysis 19
CONCLUSIONS 2]
REFERENCES 22
FIGURES
1 . Vicinity Map 2
2 . Existing Volumes 6
3 . Background Volumes 13
4. Site-Generated Traffic 18
5 . Total Traffic With Site 20
TABLES
1 . Level of Service Definitions (Signalized Intersections) . . . 7
2 . Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections . . . . 8
3 . General Level of Service Descriptions 10
for Unsignalized Intersections
4 . Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections 11
5 . Estimated Trip Generation, Bruce Blume & Company, 16
Proposed renton Site
INTRODUCTION
SCOPE OF THE REPORT
The purpose of this report is to describe the traffic related
impacts of constructing a distribution facility for Bruce Blume &
Company on Oakesdale Avenue, S.W.( in the City of Renton. Figure
1 shows the location of the site for proposed development .
Specific traffic related issues discussed in this report include:
o Existing land use and traffic conditions in the project
study area
o Estimates of trip generation, distribution, and
assignment for the proposed development
o The impact of the proposed site development on traffic
operations at key intersections and site driveways
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Bruce Blume & Company
p y is proposing to build a new distribution
facility in northwest Renton on a ;vacant site on the south side of
Oakesdale Avenue, S.W. The proposed development will consist of
two buildings with a total of approximately 267, 400 square feet of
floor space. Building A, located adjacent to Oakesdale Avenue S .W.
will have approximately 218, 3001 square feet of floor space,
including 16, 000 square feet of general office space. Building B
is located at the back of the site and will contain 49, 100 square
feet of distribution floor space., A total of 251 , 400 square feet
will be used for the distribution`; activities .
All of the office space in Building A and approximately 152, 300
square feet of distribution space; in Building A will be used by a
single user that intends to consolidate its current activities at
other sites into the proposed site. The remaining 50, 000 square
feet of distribution floor space in Building A will be used as a
storage facility by a nearby organization. The floor space in
Building B will be occupied by a, tenant that is assumed to have
operating characteristics similar: to the distribution activities
in Building A.
The current site plan calls for three site access driveways, all
from Oakesdale Avenue S.W. The center driveway would serve the
majority of truck movements to/from the site, while the easternmost
driveway would provide access for; the general office space. The
eastern driveway will also serve as a truck access to Building B,
which will include 49, 100 square feet of floor space. The western
driveway will provide supplemental{ access for truck trips generated
by Building A activities .
1
®s'Gi/ A l 1 N /fl-
.9 zn /J '
.
•
arl.
5..
Ay-
h ibc4 i
9� c
1-°1 6 c9-se& 1y
-`
7.,..
eto
0
. , /
z Limp h
k
-"------ /6: eforitE -
` c
z. 0
0
gN
EXISTING LAND USE
Much of the land in the site vicinity is vacant . Adjacent to the
proposed site, just to the east , is the Container Corporation of
America facility, which includes general offices and light
industrial uses . Just to the we'st of the proposed site is an
existing gravel/concrete recycling, operation. South and east of
the site is Metro' s Renton Wastewater Treatment Plant .
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
Direct access to the proposed siteis provided by Oakesdale Avenue
S.W. , which becomes 68th Avenue South and connects with Martin
Luther King ,Way South approximately 0. 7 miles northwest of the
site. East of the site Oakesdale Avenue extends to an intersection
with S . W. Grady Way, then passes under Interstate 405 with a
temporary termination at S.W. 16ti Street . Southwest 7th Street
intersects with Oakesdale avenue approximately 0 . 5 miles east of
the proposed site.
Access to Interstate 5 and to Interstate 405 is via Oakesdale
Avenue and Grady Way to the south and east of the site. Access to
Interstate 5 , north, is also found via Martin Luther King Way to
the north and west of the site. Following is a brief description
of key access facilities for the proposed site.
o Oakesdale Avenue S . W. ;Beginning at S .W. 16th Street ,
Oakesdale Avenue is a five-lane facility, with two lanes
in each direction, plus a center lane that is used for
left turns or as a center median . The cross-section
includes curbs and gutters . This section extends north
and west , with signalized intersections at S . W. Grady Way
and S . W 7th Street . Sidewalks are on both sides between
Grady Way and S.W. 7th Street . North of S .W. 7th Street
there is a sidewalk on' the north/east side only, and
south of Grady Way, there are no sidewalks . The five-
lane section ends approximately at the east boundary of
the proposed site. At this point, Oakesdale Avenue
narrows to a two-lane facility, with open ditch drainage,
and no sidewalks . Oakesdale Avenue becomes 68th Avenue,
South, crosses the Burlington-Northern Railroad, via an
overpass , and extends in a northerly direction to the
intersection of Martin Luther King Way, South. Traffic
on 68th Avenue South is controlled by a stop sign at :this
intersection.
o S .W. Grady Way: Between Interurban Avenue and Rainier
Avenue South, Grady Way is a four- to five-lane facility
with two lanes in each direction and a left-turn lane.
The cross-section generally consists of curbs , gutters,
and sidewalks ; however, west of Oakesdale Avenue, there
3
•
is a sidewalk on the north side only. In addition to the
traffic signal at Oakesdale Avenue, there are also
traffic signals at the intersections with Interurban
Avenue, Powell Avenue, Lind Avenue, and Rainier Avenue,
South. Access to Interstate 405 is available from Grady
Way both at Interurban Avenue and Rainier Avenue, South.
o Martin Luther King Way, South: This facility becomes
Sunset Boulevard in the' City of Renton. West of 68th
Avenue it consists of a four-lane roadway, with two lanes
in each direction, and it has open ditch drainage, with
no sidewalks. At its 'intersection with 68th Avenue,
South (Oakesdale Avenue extension) , there is no left-turn
lane for westbound traffic. Even though the demand for
this movement is low, vehicles attempting to turn are
exposed to rear-end accidents when stopped in the left
lane. The above cross section continues east to Stevens
Avenue. At Stevens Avenue, the section widens to allow
for left turn lanes , and includes curbs , gutters , and
sidewalks . There are traffic signals at Rainier Avenue,
Hardie Avenue, and at Stevens Avenue. There is also a
traffic signal at South 129th Street . The speed limit
outside the City of Renton is 50 mph.
o S .W. 7th Avenue: East of its intersection with Oakesdale
Avenue, this facility provides a four- to five-lane
roadway, with curbs, gutters , and sidewalks. It extends
east to Rainier Avenue, where there is a traffic signal .
There is also a traffic signal at Hardie Avenue.
TRANSIT SERVICE
There is no existing transit service on Oakesdale Avenue, adjacent
to the site. The nearest transit services are on Martin Luther
King Way and Grady Way.
PLANNED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS
Conversations with the City of Renton indicate that there are plans
to extend the five-lane section ; on Oakesdale Avenue from its
present terminus near the proposed site northwesterly to the
intersection of 68th Avenue and Martin Luther King Way, generally
along the existing 68th Avenue alignment. There are no detailed
plans for this improvement . It is Potentially implementable within
the next 5 to 10 years .
It is also understood that traffic signal warrants are met at the
intersection of 68th Avenue and Martin Luther King Way, and that
a traffic signal will be installed at that location when funding
becomes available.
4
•
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PEAK-HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Consultations with City of Renton staff resulted in collection of
a. m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes at two intersections in the
site vicinity: Oakesdale Avenue/Grady Way and 68th Avenue/Martin
Luther King Way. Manual turning movement counts were conducted by
Kittelson & Associates at these two locations between 7 : 00 and 9: 00
a.m. and between 4: 00 and 6: 00 P.M. on a typical weekday. The peak
hours at both locations were the same, 7: 00 to 8: 00 a.m. and 4: 00
to 5: 00 p.m. Figure 2 shows the peak hour turning volumes at these
two locations .
EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE
Level of Service (LOS) is a concept developed to quantify the
degree of comfort ( including such elements as travel time, number
of stops , total amount of stopped delay, and impediments caused by
other vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel through an
intersection or roadway segment . Recent research has determined
that average stopped delay per vehicle is the best available
measure of the LOS at a signalized intersection. As defined within
the 1985 Highway capacity Manual (Reference 1) , six grades are used
to denote the various LOS ; these six grades are described
qualitatively for signalized intersections in Table 1 .
Additionally, Table 2 identifies the relationship between level of
service and average stopped delay per vehicle. Using this
definition , a "D" LOS is generally considered to represent the
minimum acceptable design standard.
For signalized intersections , LOS defines the quality of the
traffic flow, but does not necessarily describe the overall design
adequacy of the intersection to accommodate the traffic volumes
being analyzed. As an example, a good LOS can be achieved even
when the volume/capacity ratio for the intersection exceeds .1 . 0 .
Similarly, there are conditions under which a poor LOS is achieved
even though the volume/capacity ratio for the intersection is well
below 1 . 0 . Therefore, all signalized intersection evaluations
contained in this report provide both the calculated LOS and the
calculated volume/capacity ratio for each intersection. Thus , the
reader is provided with a complete description of the expected
operating conditions for each intersection that is analyzed.
The calculation of LOS at an unsignalized intersection requires a
different approach. The 1985 Highway Capacity Manual includes a
methodology for calculating the LOS at two-way stop-controlled
intersections . For these unsignalized intersections , LOS is
defined differently than for signalized intersections in that it
is based upon the concept of "Reserve Capacity" ( i . e. , that portion
5
0
m
I V- iVi 44 •
"Z. a ..9 o 3 op ,d 3Z/5/
_— �n - N r 1"�'2%
3• 3s/._�r + r
, ,.,,
„s„
, . /
_______ ti,, 1
J e.
.
c .j -i
., , -----......
o ` � t
Nt ca.
tD
ii g zo 3 4
tz
1-1 il
, hi iy, -P' , ..
4.
, u)(// /4 -
_S - .1-'7'
/ .
9/fci?/
_. �. /7. f EA'< Imo'0 cj a ! G u g C
P fi, ?E4 14 i--A?v2 .. ZVQLns
TABLE 1
LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS
(SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS)
Level of
Service Traffic Flow Characteristics
A Very low average stopped delay, less than five seconds per
vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely
favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase.
Most vehicles do not stop at all . Short cycle lengths may
also contribute to low delay.
B Average stop delay is in the range of 5 . 1 to 15. 0 seconds
per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression
and/or short cycle lengths . More vehicles stop than for
LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay.
C Average stopped delay is in the range of 15 . 1 to 25 . 0
seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from
fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths . Individual
cycle failures may begin to appear in this level . The
number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level ,
although many still pass through the intersection without
stopping.
D Average stopped delays are in the range of 25 . 1 to 40 . 0
seconds per vehicle. The influence of congestion becomes
more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some
combination of unfavorable progression , long cycle length,
or high volume/capacity. ratios . Many vehicles stop, and
the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines .
Individual cycle failures are noticeable.
E Average stopped delays are in the range of 40 . 1 to 60 . 0
seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit
of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally
indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths , and high
volume/capacity ratios . ? Individual cycle failures are
frequent occurrences .
F Average stop delay is in excess of 60 seconds per vehicle.
This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers .
This condition often occurs with oversaturation. It may
also occur at high volume/capacity ratios below 1 . 00 with
many individual cycle failures . Poor progression and long
cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such
high delay levels .
Note: A signal cycle failure is considered to occur when one or
more vehicles are forced to wait through more than one
green signal indication, for a particular approach.
7
TABLE 2
LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Stopped Delay Per
Level of Service Vehicle (Sec)
A <= 5 . 0
B 5. 1 to 15. 0
C 15 . 1 to 25 . 0
D 25. 1 to 40 . 0
E 40 . 0 to 60 . 0
F > 60 . 0
8
of available hourly capacity that is not used) . A qualitative
description of the various service' levels associated with an
unsignalized intersection is presented in Table 3 . A quantitative
definition of LOS for an unsignalized intersection is presented in
Table 4 .
The reserve capacity concept applies only to an individual traffic
movement or to shared lane movements . Once the capacity of all the
individual movements has been calculated and their LOS and expected
delays determined, an overall evaluation of the intersection can be
made. Normally, the movement having the worst LOS defines the
overall evaluation, but this may be tempered by engineering
judgement. An "E" LOS is generally considered to represent the
minimum acceptable design standard.
Past experience with the unsignalized analysis procedure indicates
this methodology is very conservative in that it tends to
overestimate the magnitude of any potential problems that might
exist . This is especially true for minor street left turn movements .
Therefore, the results of any unsignalized intersection analysis
should be reviewed with this thought in mind.
The results of the existing LOS calculations at the two key
intersections considered in this study indicate the following:
o Oakesdale Avenue/Grady Way
- a.m. peak: Delay = 26. 5 seconds per vehicle
Volume/Capacity = 0 . 698
Level of Service = D
- p.m. peak: Delay = 32. 2 seconds per vehicle
Volume/Capacity = 0 . 751
Level of Service = D
o Martin Luther King way/68th Avenue
- a.m. peak: Reserve Capacity = 5
Level of Service = E
- p.m. peak: Reserve Capacity = -75
Level of Service = F
At the signalized intersection of Oakesdale Avenue and Grady Way,
the existing LOS is at the D level in both the a.m. and p.m. peak
hours . LOS D is generally considered to be acceptable for peak hour
operations in urban areas .
BACKGROUND LEVEL OF SERVICE
Traffic volumes in the site vicinity are constantly increasing due
to increased development in the area and due to more trips being
made by individuals residing in the region . Since the proposed
facility will not be completed and occupied until the Fall of 1990 ,
estimates of traffic growth between the present time and the time
of occupancy have been considered. Experience by the City of Renton
indicates that this type of traffic growth has been averaging
approximately 3 percent per year, Thue , the traffic velthae §hewh
9
TABLE 3
GENERAL LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS FOR
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
LOS General Description
A - Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation
- Very seldom is there more than one vehicle in
the queue
B - Some drivers begin to consider the delay an
inconvenience
- Occasionally there is more than one vehicle in
the queue
C - Many times there is more than one vehicle in the
queue
- Most drivers feel restricted, but not
objectionably so
D - Often there is more than one vehicle in the queue
- Drivers feel quite restricted
E - Represents a condition in which the demand is
near or equal to the probable maximum number of
vehicles that can be accommodated by the movement
- There is almost always more than one vehicle in
the queue
- Drivers find the delays to be approaching
intolerable levels
F - Forced flow
- Represents an intersection failure condition
that is caused by geometric and/or operational
constraints external to the intersection
1'0
TABLE 4
LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA
for
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Reserve Capacity Level of Expected Delay to
(pcph) Service Minor Street Traffic
>400 A Little or no delay
300-399 B Short traffic delays
200-299 C Average traffic delays
100-199 D Long traffic delays
0- 99 E Very long traffic delays
* F
* When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane,
extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which
may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic
movements in the intersection. This condition usually
warrants improvement to the intersection.
•
11
in Figure 2 , for existing conditions have been increased by 2 percent
to account for traffic growth from now until the time of occupancy
of the proposed site (8 months) . The resulting traffic volumes at
the two key intersections under consideration are shown in Figure 3 .
LOS was re-calculated based on these background traffic volumes . The
results of the analysis are shown below.
o Oakesdale Avenue/Grady Way
- a.m. peak: Delay = 27 . 0 seconds per vehicle
Volume/Capacity = 0 . 712
Level of Service = D
- p.m. peak: Delay = 33 . 1 seconds per vehicle
Volume/Capacity = 0 . 767
Level of Service = D
o Martin Luther King Way/68th Avenue
- a.m. peak: Reserve Capacity = 4
Level of service = E
- p.m. peak: Reserve Capacity = -77
Level of Service = F
•
it
12
S3/vn -'°A dfvnQ Jai'bg. ._ ._ _ . .... vno Lf w�r� 7• ' ;/ d 1 - .
.;an9/� /— 7no� >ic,iPZ/ .bw •� I . ._.
61//6SS
r✓
07
04. �D� �� VI
8 y
20()tiff . ' or - .
' 7--- - \,.. .„k
4 1-•\;? '
O • dl ��
LI y Z/ —'V v2 i
_7
61
:gi`'' .t. - .
J4*
(f43 tvz/bv
to .- 0,
2.zoir arro.7. " / .c ) t E;
r.
5//0I Uj tl
z Ciw
114 !
rrh
.i eA-06
�� /6. p ------
\ \ `E
w
4
O
tiiN i
1
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Morning and evening peak-hour trips , as well as daily trips ,
generated by the proposed development were analyzed as follows :
o The total number of future daily, morning peak hour, and
evening peak hour trips both in and out of the proposed
site were estimated for complete buildout of the site.
o Background a.m. and p.m. peak hour volumes were estimated
for the two key intersections for the time of anticipated
occupancy of the site in the Fall of 1990 .
o Site-generated traffic predicted for weekday morning and
evening peak hours were assigned to the road network
serving the site and added to the background traffic
volumes .
o The movement of traffic to and from the Container
Corporation of America facility, adjacent to the proposed
site, was examined to, obtain an estimate of trip
distribution patterns within the study area.
o Traffic demands at each of the two key intersections were
analyzed to identify capacity or level of service
deficiencies under assumed conditions after site occupancy
in the Fall of 1990 .
SITE GENERATED TRIPS
•
Estimates of total daily, a.m. peak hour, and p.m. peak hour driveway
volumes for the proposed facility were developed based on empirical
observations at similar distribution facilities located throughout
the United States . These empirical observations are summarized in
a standard reference manual published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (Reference 2) . Since a large part of the
proposed site will be occupied by the consolidation of identical
existing operations at other sites , it was possible to measure some
aspects of trip generation at these facilities in order to verify the
published rates .
Interviews with operators of existing operations to be moved to the
proposed sites were made. The interviews indicated that the primary
site user has 35 company vehicles that are used to distribute goods
from the warehouse to various outlets in the Seattle area.
Generally, these vehicles are loaded at night and are ready to be
dispatched early each morning. Records indicate that , on the
average, about 80 percent of these vehicles make one round trip
to/from the warehouse each weekday. Company records also show the
number of truck arrivals each day during 1989 to the warehouses to
deliver large loads of goods . From this information, an estimate of
daily truck travel to/from the proposed site was made.
To verify the truck travel data from company records, field
observations were made at existing operations . The truck trip
generation estimate made from records indicated a range of total
14
truck trips between 70 and 86 daily trips. Field observations
between the hours of 7 : 00 a.m. and 5: 00 p.m. resulted in a total of
86 total truck trips , which verifies the upper end of the estimate
made from company records .
Because all of the existing sites do not include employee parking on-
site, it was not possible to make accurate field observations to
verify employee and visitor trips to these sites . However, estimates
of trip generation for general offices should provide a reasonably
accurate estimate of these trips . In addition, Kittelson and
Associates previously performed field studies of a site with similar
operations to the one currently under consideration, and found that
estimates based on employees in a general office matched observed
values for the p.m. peak hour (Reference 3) .
The Institute of Transportation Engineers ( ITE) trip generation rates
include a choice of alternative development parameters. In the case
of a distribution (warehousing) facility, the alternative rates
included are: trips per square foot of floor area, trips per
employee, and trips per acre. When specific plans are available, the
selection of either floor space on employees is usually made.
Calculations of trip generation for the proposed site were made using
both the ITE floor space and employee trip generation rates . The
results of these calculations were 'compared with field data collected
at the existing sites of operations to be moved to the proposed site.
This comparison indicates that trip generation based on floor space
results in trip generation totals much higher than those observed for
the existing operations . Trip generation based on employees is much
closer to observed results .
Since detailed information is available for the movement of trucks
to and from the existing sites , this data was combined with trip
generation rates for offices , based on the number of employees , to
arrive at a realistic estimate of trip generation for the proposed
facility. The resulting trip generation estimate is summarized in
Table 5 , along with trip generation estimates based on ITE trip
generation rates for floor space and employees .
TRIP DISTRIBUTION/ASSIGNMENT
The distribution of site-generated trips for the proposed facility
onto the roadway system serving the site was estimated through an
examination of the movement of traffic to and from the adjacent site
occupied by the Container Corporation of America. As a result of
this review, it is estimated that 85 percent of the site-generated
trips will use Oakesdale Avenue to the south and east and the
remaining 15 percent of site-generated traffic will use 68th Avenue
for site access . The site-generated trips were assigned to the two
key intersections based on this trip distribution pattern.
The site-generated trips were further assigned to these
intersections , based on existing turning movement ratios at the two
intersections . Site-generated trips are shown on Figure 4 .
15
TABLE 5
ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION
BRUCE BLUME & COMPANY
PROPOSED RENTON SITE
ASSUMPTIONS :
Building A: Total Square Footage - 218, 300
Office Square Footage - 16, 000
Warehouse Square Footage - 202, 300
Total Employees - 120
Drivers - 45
Office Employees - 25
Warehouse Employees - 7
Outside Sales - 43
Future work stations - 8
Building B : Total Square Footage - 49, 100
Office Square Footage - 0
Warehouse Square Footage - 49, 100
Total Employees - 17*
Drivers - 15*
Office Employees - 0
Warehouse Employees - 2*
Outside Sales - 0
* Estimate based on Building A.
TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES :
Based on Square Footage:
Building A :
Office: 347 trips per day, a.m. 42, p.m. 44
Warehouse: 1 , 045 trips per day, a.m. 115 , p.m. 150
Total : 1 , 392 trips per day, a. m. 157, p.m. 194
Building B :
Warehouse: 240 trips per day, a.m. 28, p.m. 36
•
Total , Buildings A & B: 1 , 579 trips per day, a.m. 185 ,
p.m. 230
Based on Employees :
Building A:
Office: 211 trips per day, a.m. 23, p.m. 22
Warehouse: 202 trips per day, a.m. 26, p.m. 31
Total: 413 trips per day, a.m. 49, p.m. 53
Building B :
Warehouse: 66 trips per day, a.m. 9, p.m. 10
Total , Buildings A & B : . 479 per day, a.m. 58, p.m. 63
TABLE 5 (CONTINUED)
ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION
BRUCE BLUME & COMPANY
PROPOSED RENTON SITE.
Based on Combination Truck/Employees :
Building A:
Truck Trips: Container Corp. of America (1) 2
Large Trucks ' 22
Delivery Vans 64
Total Truck Trips (Daily) 88
Total Truck Trips (a.m. ) 15
Total Truck Trips (p.m. ) 6
Employee Trips : (2) 416 per day, a.m. 50 , p.m. 48
Total trips : 502 per day, a.m. 65 , p.m. 54
Building B :
Truck Trips : Large & Delivery (Daily) 28
Truck Trips : Large & Delivery (a.m. ) 5
Truck Trips: Large & Delivery (p.m. ) 2
Employee Trips : (3) 66 per day, a.m. 9, p. m. 10
Total Trips : 94 per day, a.m. 14 , p.m. 12
Total , Buildings A & B : 596 per day, a.m. 79, p.m. 66 (4)
( 1) Estimated truck activity to serve the 50, 000 square feet
of floor space in Building A that is to be used for storage
only.
(2) Includes office workers , warehouse workers, drivers ,
outside sales , and visitors .
(3) Includes warehouse workers and drivers .
(4) This estimate of trip generation was used for the following
traffic impact analysis.
Note: Above calculations assume that only 25% of outside
sales staff comes to the office each ' day (current
operation) .
17
V�
Q
J \-
to
, ,I
�,t4td y�
9rtl ti h .
h
n►a17 lam-
.-:
�—
sZ. a s 5/3
of/ 'if 14k 3
3. /// 4
to 6.//z 0 li)
' o
o / 3 JIt
o�
t
1 r
v a
..,, .
.......i
4)
, ,_
qi . ..
, ,
, wore pkie-
A Op
4k, to
el q's
4.
14
.e„... .S , ri
/ .
j 9//49
• _. R• /1. f� A E "< f�'a _ . F/ Go R 6
P /`?, PEAK I4o v2 S/TE C"NE g 4 TE P M. 4F6/G
TOTAL VOLUMES WITH PROPOSED PROJECT
To evaluate the impacts of the additional site-generated traffic on
the two key intersections, the site-generated trips were added to the
background volumes shown. in Figure 3 to arrive at total estimated
traffic volumes at these two locations following site occupancy in
the Fall of 1990. These volumes are shown on Figure 5.
LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECT
A level of service analysis using total estimated traffic volumes
was made for the two key intersections under consideration.
Following is a summary of this analysis for the two key
intersections .
o Oakesdale Avenue/Grady Way
a.m. peak: Delay = 27. 3 seconds per vehicle
Volume/Capacity = 0. 738
Level of Service = D
p.m. peak : Delay = 33 . 4 seconds per vehicle
Volume/Capacity = 0 . 786
Level of Service = D
o Martin Luther King Way/68th 68th Avenue
- a.m. peak: Reserve Capacity = 1
Level of Service = E
- p.m. peak : Reserve Capacity = -83
Level of Service = F
SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
' Conversations with Renton City staff have given the understanding
that a traffic signal is currently warranted at the intersection of
68th Avenue South and Martin, Luther King Way South. The results of
a.m. and p.m. peak hour turning movement counts made for this study
confirm that signal warrants are met based on the peak hour volume
warrant described in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(Reference 4) are met during the p.m. peak hour. During the p.m.
peak hour, 2106 vehicles approached the intersection on Martin Luther
King Way (both directions) and 138 vehicles approached the
intersection on 68th Avenue. The peak hour volume warrant is met
when at least 1800 and 100 vehicles approach an intersection with
geometrics like the one under consideration.
i / S 7Y1 /M 1.dd 0121/ 7 / C - 2/nail ?/YQI '/1/
6fi//6S£
' /
S--
•
h0
1�0 c
40
(to 1\gt4---j'.
7-- . ‘
Ak
O A Q)
-- N y S2/ 1 \ 4/
a /Z x
o i 7) / cb o
�` 422 / •?(N'a
\° „1 9,'Z/77/ N
�Z2fiE .z
2o-E/��/ (/a
tA
5 8 1.) u, Z Limp rn.1
14 7
.\ ri gE (Z AL)6
5 /6 VI
t2A`'
t-\ r
o
0
kl1
•
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the traffic impact analysis described in this report , it
is concluded that the roadway system within the study area can
accommodate the additional traffic volumes resulting from the
distribution functions envisioned! for the proposed site. The peak
hour traffic volumes expected to be generated by the proposed site
have very little impact on the key intersections analyzed in this
study.
A traffic signal appears to be warranted at the intersection of
Martin Luther King Way and 68th Avenue, with or without the proposed
project. Following installation of the signal , all of the proposed
i site access drives and nearby key intersections evaluated are
expected to operate within acceptable service levels upon occupancy
of the site in accordance with the proposed development plan.
it
e,
'
REFERENCES
1 . Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, Special
Report No. 209, 1985 .
2. Institute of Transportation Engineers , Trip Generation Manual,
Fourth Edition, 1988.
3. Kittelson & Associates , Inc. , Traffic Report, Alaska
Distributors Company, Proposed Renton Facility, 1989.
4. U. S . Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for
Streets and Highways, 1988.
i
•
22
lance mueller
& associates
architects
PLANNING DIVISION
February 5, 1990 CITY OFRE,NroN
FEB — 91
Ms. Lenore Blauman
CITY OF RENTON .: EIVE ,�
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: SID ELAND/BLUME RENTON
Dear Lenore:
I met with Jim Gray of the Renton Fire Prevention Division on
Friday to reveiw the required fire flow now that we have
received the available flow data. The required fire flow for a
III—N building on this site will be 7500 gpm and for a type II—N
building will be 5750 gpm. The available fire flow at the site
is 5640 gpm at 8 cubic ft. per minute.
After discussing this with Glenn Gordon and Jim Gray, we have
two options based on the required fire flow. The first choice
is to build a type III—N building with a 4—hr. fire wall at
106,000 s.f. or the second choice is to build a type II—N
building with no fire walls. Either one of these options will
not change the site or building design. The option selection
will be made at the time of permit submittal.
Based on this data, we request that our project be immediately
posted for environment review.
Sincerely,
LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS
Bob Fadden
Associate
BF:nk
cc: Glenn Gorden
Bob Raichle
Jim Garrison
Sid Eland
130 lakeside • suite 260 • Seattle,washington 99122 • 206/325-2653 • fax:[206]326-0554
lance mueller ale,cal • senior associates:robert olscheweky,eileen furney
associates:robert fadden,micheel gelbreith,richerd herniah,robert wells
a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by end under the supervision of registered architects
7EP [715: 1911 aE BR .H . 2 32.1.: 71a'15 P. 1/4
• PLANNING DIVISION
(0040't*e- 2 Fi0ED & HITCHINGS, INC CITY OF RENT()N
)
CIVil. ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS
del 111 FEB 5 „
oc
avemNon. AVE: ,sr SEATTI,, ,WA a.sica • u
A
• *MI
, • Area: 20Ei 222-4144 RECEIVED
Esx . 206/32 -.7135
TELei.:;()MMUNICATIONS COVER SHEET
Date
THf . T:31:ON C(jNSISTS OF PAGES. (Including this Cover Page.)
Ti-FIS TANSM1SSION TO(. •
•
•. .
, trOMFIFIR: cct
.•
•
MATION TC..T.b/M71Z: •
IS FROM: •
•
• .
6 •
1
,
tv
ll
•
•
•
..1NY -.MESE P,61.0ES1-1.-,.::.7 NOT LEGIP.L. ,OP IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES,PLEASE
CONUACT 0,1'Ft ,ERATOP SOON PrISala.,...(20:6)323-4144
• Job No.
- • •
•
r Lb k7 ''JU 14;c,-j bt<&H
RECEIVED
•
FEB - 5 1990 mess
feeling
February 1, 1900
Mr. Bob Reed
Bush,Roed, & Hitchints, Inc. PLANNING DIVISION
2000 Minor Avenue East CITY OF RENTON
Seattle,WA 98102
FEB 5 1990
milkm n BRUCE BLUM PROJECT F 1AO 1 ANALYSIS
RECiEl VC IN
Dear Mr. Reed;
A computer analysis of the City of Renton's Water System was performed for the purpose of
determining the available water supply to fight a fire(fireflow) at the site of the proposed Coewinet
Corporation Warehouse located on 601 Monster Road. This letter summarizes the results and
procedures used to determine the fireflow capability of the City's System to fight a fire at this location.
The analysis is bated on the existing City of Renton Water System,with the addition of the following
proposed water system improvement:
A 12-inch diameter watermain loop beginning at the existing 12-inch diameter watermain in
Monster Road approximately 650 feet south of Oakesdale Avenue SW and connecting to an
existing 12-inch diameter watermain dead end in Oakesdale Avenue SW approximately 800
feet west of Monster Road.
The proposed improvement need to determine the fireflow capacity for the project is displayed on the
attached figure.
The results of the analysis indicate that the fireflow capacity of the City's System with the
improvement is approximately 5,640 gallons per minute (GPM)at a residual pressure of 20 psi in the
watermain located at the west side of the loop (see Node A on attached figure). Where the Water
System was experiencing pipeline water velocities in excess of 8-feet per second, the corresponding
flowrate was reduced so that the velocity of the water in the pipeline was less than the Insurance
Services Office (ISO) maximum velocity criteria of 8-feet per second. Operating the system with
velocities in excess of 8-feet per second may result in physical damage to the water system.
The fireflow capability for this analysis was computed using the Insurance Services Office (ISO)
criteria, which is used by the Washington Survey and Rating Bureau,the local rating company.' In
accordance with ISO criteria,the Water System was simulated experiencing a maximum day demand
with the single largest source of supply,Well No. 8, out of service (e.g., due to failure,maintenance,
etc.). A summary of the operational conditions used in the analysis follows:
•
• Minimum, service pressures of 30 psi in the service area during normal demands and
20 psi during fire demands.
• Well Nos. 1R, 2R, 3R and 9 are in operation, while Well No, 8 is out of service,
• Springbrook Springs is supplying the Water System at 1,300 gpm
• Talbot Hill Reservoir is in operation experiencing 3 feet of drawdown.
1410 Market Street, P.O. Box 1180, Kirkland, Washington '.r.3033 (206) 827-6400
F LLB U5 , �M 14:c4 cl •3 71 �. h'..14
•
Mr. Bob Rood
February 1, 1990
Page 2
•
' 'rho figure which summarizes the irefiow analysis is attached for your reference.
A copy of the computer output has been retained in this office for future reference. Please contact me
if you have any questions or concerns regarding this analysis.
Sincerely,
RH12 ENGINEERAVG, P.S.
Tom C. b g,.Staf4i Engin:eer.
Attachment: Figure
r k.h Vl`, 'ski 14:c4 LjK&H LUh .Jc f L D I-.
1. r
12' (..4.3)
„........,.,„.66,1 LEW* 6.3.1. ..-,,.., .,eins 12.4a. 1..Z11 Wait
3cai GAF
1 a L,)1 -a—Ri M .UAKESDALE AVE SW i;i 441
11
1 .„�,.....' FIRE LOCATION
8, ,
N. / rt�
o
� �. ME RO
CY- ' "S7
•
DISPOSAL
op
4 4' ,'r
4
4.,3, ,
i 1
Ii, .
. ..
,11 a.
,...c,„..,) .
. ,
1 • .
i .
$jFiVoEE . LLME PROJECT FIREFLOW_LA.VALYSIS
AVAILABLE CAPACITY : 5962 GPM 0 20 PSI
BERATED CAPACITY � 4�_ '1! @ 20 PSI
d
1 Derated capacity bosed on maximum velocity of water e� � ,
in h e pipeline of 8 fe t per second. RH7 o,r R141G,RS.
/ /I- DI
RH2 ENGINEERING, P.S. LL,rr [ OF U Q 1�6rA�l�]EITIM L
- 1410 Market Street
P.O. Box 1180
KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033
DATE 2/2/90 JOB NO. 1299.00
(206) 827-6400 ATTENTIONMs. Lenora Blauman
RE:
To CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPT
200 Mill Avenue South PECAN ogti DIVISION
orr'der DCPITh
Renton, WA 98055
FLL 5 Ow
REcoyfFn
WE ARE SENDING YOU a Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans 0 Samples ❑ Specifications
0 Copy of letter LI Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 Bruce Blume Fireflow Analysis
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
ll For your use 0 Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested 0 Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
LI For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS Enclosed is the results for the Bruce Blume Fireflow Analysis
(Container Corporation Warehouse) performed by RH2 Engineering for
Bush, Roed and Hitchings, Inc.
COPY TO
SIGNED: Tom Lindberg
renmirr74a2 nm, rmmn M man_ If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
. • ill ='; :'I,�,�. i _1
' ,�,i'•1',. is�',:' ... i,!� '•� � ;: '
S1299.00 (.299) Engineering
February 1, 1990
PLANNING DIVISION
Mr. Bob Roed � ,_. ; : � ;; CITY OF PIeNTOP,9
Bush,Roed, & Hitchings, Inc.
2009 Minor Avenue East FEB5 7990
Seattle,WA 98102 l
SUBJECT:' BRUCE BLUME PROJECT FIREFLOW ANALYSIS
Dear Mr. Roed:
A computer analysis of the City of Renton's Water System was performed for the purpose of
determining the available water supply to fight a fire(fireflow) at the site of the proposed Container
Corporation Warehouse located on 601 Monster Road. This letter summarizes the results and
procedures used to determine the fireflow capability of the City's System to fight a fire at this location.
The analysis is based on the existing City of Renton Water System, with the addition of the following
proposed water system improvement:
A 12-inch diameter watermain loop beginning at the existing 12-inch diameter watermain in
Monster Road approximately 650 feet south of Oakesdale Avenue SW and connecting to an
existing 12-inch diameter watermain dead end in Oakesdale Avenue SW approximately 800
feet west of Monster Road.
The proposed improvement used to determine the fireflow capacity for the project is displayed on the
attached figure.
The results of the analysis indicate that the fireflow capacity of the City's System with the
improvement is approximately 5,640 gallons per minute(GPM)at a residual pressure of 20 psi in the
watermain located at the west side of the loop (see Node A on attached figure). Where the Water
System was experiencing pipeline water velocities in excess of 8-feet per second, the corresponding
flowrate was reduced so that the velocity of the water in the pipeline was less than the Insurance
Services Office (ISO) maximum velocity criteria of 8-feet per second. Operating the system with
velocities in excess of 8-feet per second may result in physical damage to the water system.
The fireflow capability for this analysis was computed using the Insurance Services Office (ISO)
criteria, which is used by the Washington Survey and Rating Bureau, the local rating company. In
accordance with ISO criteria,the Water System was simulated experiencing a maximum day demand
with the single largest source of supply,Well No. 8, out of service (e.g., due to failure, maintenance,
etc.). A summary of the operational conditions used in the analysis follows:
• Minimum service pressures of 30 psi in the service area during normal demands and;,.,,
20 psi during fire demands.
• • Well Nos. 1R, 2R, 3R and 9 are in operation, while Well No. 8 is out of service. a.
• Springbrook Springs is supplying the Water System at 1,300 gpm
• Talbot Hill Reservoir is in operation experiencing 3 feet of drawdown.
•
1410 Market Street, P.O. Box.1,180, Kirkland, Washington 98033 (206) 827-6400
Mr.Bob Roed . I '',,
February 1,'1990
Page; .
The figure which summarizes the fireflow analysis is attached for your reference.
A copy of the computer output has been retained in this office for future reference. Please contact me
if you have any questions or concerns regarding this analysis.
Sincerely,
RH2 ENGINEERING, P.S.
- Torn C. Lindberg; Staff Engineer
Attachment Figure
i ;
r '
0
•
12° 12° ® 12°
53 3027 GPM 110
8.6 FPS OAKESDALE AVE SW 12'
N aat
I r
o�?
I Mm 0
^I�FIRE LOCATION
ell„
NODE "A
2945 GPM N1
a
8.4 FPS
/ 12°
- - - - � METRO
ei 12. CID
DISPOSAL
<t•
0
H
aas
BRUCE BLUME PROJECT FIREFLOW ANALYSIS
AVAILABLE CAPACITY : 5962 GPM © 20 PSI
DERATED CAPACITY : 5640 GPM © 20 PSI *
* Derated capacity based on maximum velocity of water 1/26/90
in the pipeline of 8 feet per second. RH2 ENGINEERING,P.S.
//a - q
a ® CITY OF RENTON
"LL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Design/Utility Engineering
January 31, 1990
PLAN
RING pIV/SION
Robert M. Roed, P.E. OF
Bush, Roed & Hitchings FEB RENrpN
2009 Minor Ave. E. 5 /990
Seattle, WA. 98102
Re: Blume Co. Distribution Facility
Oakesdale Av. SW & Monster Road
Renton, WA
Dear Mr. Roed:
I have checked over your proposed control of runoff for the Blume Distribution Facility,
given to me by Dick Anderson. Based upon King County Drainage Standards, which are
accepted by the City of Renton, the storage requirements for a closed depression are a
100 year/7 day design storm, by use of the SCS Hydrograph method.
The calculations that you sent were for wetland storage, with infiltration of the soil
taken into account. These calculations will have to be revised to accommodate a 100
year/ 7 day storm. The infiltration rate must be supported by a Soils Engineer Report.
Since there will be significant impervious area added to this development, it will be
necessary to provide baffled oil/water separators before the runoff enters the wetland
area.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 235-2631.
Very Truly Yours,
-Y./t44, J1 /1,,
Kim D. Scattarella
Storm Water Engineering Specialist
BLUME/KDS:lf
cc: Dick Anderson
Lenora Blauman
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631
Facsimile (206) 235-2513
4'o ® CITY OF RENTON
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Design/Utility Engineering
January 31, 1990
Robert M. Roed, P.E.
Bush, Roed & Hitchings
2009 Minor Ave. E.
Seattle, WA. 98102
Re: Blume Co. Distribution Facility
Oakesdale Av. SW & Monster Road
Renton, WA
Dear Mr. Roed:
I have checked over your proposed control of runoff for the Blume Distribution Facility,
given to me by Dick Anderson. Based upon King County Drainage Standards, which are
accepted by the City of Renton, the storage requirements for a closed depression are a
100 year/7 day design storm, by use of the SCS Hydrograph method.
The calculations that you sent were for wetland storage, with infiltration of the soil
taken into account. These calculations will have to be revised to accommodate a 100
year/ 7 day storm. The infiltration rate must be supported by a Soils Engineer Report.
Since there will be significant impervious area added to this development, it will be
necessary to provide baffled oil/water separators before the runoff enters the wetland
area.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 235-2631.
Very Truly Yours,
"%/1-;
Kim D. Scattarella
Storm Water Engineering Specialist
BLUME/KDS:If
cc: Dick Anderson
Lenora Blauman
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631
Facsimile 12(16) 2a5-251a
•
141:51. FROM BRUC:E BLUME AND CO. TO 2352513 P.01
±;i0 RUC E
BLUNI.,E
PLAVNgP'Y's,9"
6.,„ 0.,ipits
COMPANY. h6r
JAN 2 6 1990
,ECEIVED
EA.c52133Tzff.,RAvs_many,,
TO: '7761C-L-let,rYta-tA..— DATE: /- Ate
•
FAX
FROM:
BRI,70 )-s.f,riti-F.1 A COMPANY
(aT) 6:3:3'-4€89
:51.158:z or }?AGES 11--ZANSMITTED (INCLUDES COVER SHEET)
• ..'L.-iiinSk.t(7,3i;
-
•
• ••••
- --
146 Nown-i CANAL.STREET,SUITE 310 SEATTLE, WASHINGToN 9gio3 (200632-1800 144.*:!((20(,)63346m
.TAN-26-199O 14:51 FROM BRUCE BLUME AND CO. TO 2352513 P.02
BRUCE
BLUM E
& COMPANTY____ R1 Ai:3:S J-,\ F.I)1 O 'I RS
January 26, 1990
PLA
On; DtV11
To: Li:nora Blauman FR;TON
. SIG*
From: Jim Garrison ✓�N�6 9
���a� 11ee o
Re: Traffic Assessment ,v�®
Dear Lenora:
Per .our phone conversation yesterday, attached you will find
the Trip Generation Estimates for three alternative
evaluation methods as prepared by Dean Hobson of Kittleson &
Assoc.
Our position is that the actual office employee, truck,
Outside sales and warehouse employee total should be the
basis for a traffic assessment in lieu of a square footage
methodology. Clearly, this results in a substantially more
fLctual definition of the financial traffic mitigation
assessment for the project.
In that this is restricting our permit processing, your
assistance to clear this item is needed at the earliest
opportunity.
Please let me know when we can meet to resolve this issue.
cc: Dean Hobson
Bob Fadden
•
•
•
.f.
146 NORTH (:A°„11, 1 MEET, SUITE 310 SEATFI.E, WASHIN(aToN 98103 (206)6.3Z-1800 FAX (206)63.3-4(,1()
•
3111-i- 1SBO 14:52 FROM BRUCE BLUME AND CO. TO 2352513 P.B3
61)
BRUCE BLUME & COMPANY
PROPOSED E1) NTON SITE
ASSUMPTIONS:
Building A: Total Square Footage - 230,000
Office Square Footage - 16,000
Warehouse Square Footage 214, 000
Total Employees - 120
• Drivers - 46
Office Employees - 25
Warehouse Employees - 7
Outside Sales - 43
Future work stations - 8
Building B: Total Square Footage - 60,000 •
Office Square Footage 3,000 (5%)
Warehouse Square Footage - 67,000
Total Employees - 32*
Drivers - 12*
Office Employees - 7*
Warehouse Employees - 2*
Outside Sales - 11* 411
* Estimate based on Building A.
TRH) OENBRATION_AMMATIMI
c Dosed on Square Footage:
`==�� Building A:t. Office: 247 trips per day
Warehouse: 1 , 045 trips per day
Total : 1, 392 trips per day
•
Building B:
Office: 99 trips per day
Warehouse: 278 trips per day
Tofial: 377 trips per day
Total , Buildings A & B: 1, 769 tripe per day
3 Based on Employees:
Building A:
Office: 340 trips per day (211)
Warehouse: 202 trips per day (202)
Total: 542 trips per day (413)
Building 9:
Office: 97 trips per day ( 56)
. Warehouse: 64 trips per day ( 64)
Total : 151 tripe per day ( 110)
Total , Buildings A & B: 693 _(523)
I
' 52 FROM BRUCE BLUME AND CO. TO 2352513 P.04
. .
Lr fratiod on Combination Truck/Employees;
BnildiLg A:
Truck Trips: Container Corp, of Amerio, 2
Large Trucks 12
Delivery Vans
Total Truck Trips 74(74)
Employee Trips: ** 834(416)
Total trips: 608(490)
Auilding )3
Truck Trips: Large & Delivery M1( 20)
Employee Trips: ** 161(123)
Total Trips; 181(143)
Total , Buildings 4 & B: 7g0(633)
*$ Includes drivers, outside pales , & visitors
( ) Total trips if only 25% of outside sales staff COMGO to
office each day.
01-9,4-90
-1
I RUC E
1II, 1` ,
&COMPANY REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS
January 24, 1990
PLASM M MOO
Lenora Blauman CITY t):R::: YTOF;N
City of Renton
Municipal Building JAN 2 5 1990
200 Mill Ave. South
Renton, Wa. 98055 RECEN/FD
Re: Container Corporation project.
Dear Lenora:
As a quick written update and as I related by phone last
Thursday, we are proceeding ahead to supplement our
information in the three areas below as requested.
1. Traffic. Actual employee counts have been completed and
verified with the owner/occupants. They have been
supplied to our traffic consultant, Mr. Dean Hobson of
Kittleson & Assoc. I understand he has scheduled a
meeting for Tuesday with the appropriate person with
Renton to review and finalize that issue.
2 . Flood Plane. Bush, Roed & Hitchings is finalizing
verification of their previously prepared calculations in
order to assure the city of the storm water detention
storage capacity. That will be completed this week.
3 . Fire Flow. Engineers have reviewed the fire flow
requirements. While the fire flows are considered
excessive, they are preparing the computer model to
calculate the fire flows at the project and will be done
this week.
In the absence of speaking with you by phone, I would like to
submit that our project permit review should continue in
order to address any other remaining elements at the earliest
convenience and in the most efficient manner. Please advise
me of the opportunity to do so.
Thank you for attention to the above.
Since. ely
b‘ . s) ,.4 ,
, .
i #
Jam= D. Garrisol
cc: Bob Fadden
Bob Roed
\ 146 NORTH CANAL STREET, SUITE 310 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98103 (206)632-1800 FAX (206)633-4680
PREPARED FOR
BRUCE BLUME AND ASSOCIATES
velit? 48eabe
8 �990 Nabil T. Dbaibo
J AN Project Engineer �EN M4
��p4 W•ASy�V.,.
Cri
Gl Mann, P.E.
Vice President o �01 STE �o `s4'
�f`S'OtlAL t"
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
OAKSDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST
RENTON, WASHINGTON
E-4563
September 27, 1989
Earth Consultants, Inc.
1805 - 136th Place Northeast
Suite 101
Bellevue, Washington 98005
(206) 643-3780
222 East 26th Street, Suite 103
Tacoma, Washington 98411-9998
(206) 272-6608
Ly
TABLE OF CONTENTS
E-4563
Page
INTRODUCTION 1
Project Description 1
Scope of Services 1
SITE CONDITIONS 2
Surface 2
Subsurface 2
Groundwater 3
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3
General 3
Site Preparation and General Earthwork 5
Foundations 6
Dock-High Retaining Walls 7
Slab-on-Grade Floors 8
Settlements 8
Surcharge Program 9
Excavations and Slopes 11
Rockeries 11
Site Drainage 12
Utility Support 13
Pavement Areas 14
• LIMITATIONS 15
Additional Services 15
Appendix A - Field Exploration
Appendix B - Laboratory Testing
Appendix C - Rockery Guideline
Earth Consultants, Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS (con't)
ILLUSTRATIONS
Plate 1 Vicinity Map
Plate 2 Test Pit and Boring Location Plan
Plate 3 Legend
Plates 4 through 6 Boring Logs
Plates 7 through 15 Test Pit Logs
Plates 16 through 17 Grain Size Analyses
Plate 18 Atterberg Limits Test Data
Plate 19 Retaining Wall Drainage and Backfill
Plate 20 Typical Monitoring Plate Detail
PIate 21 Schematic Structural Fill
Plate 22 Typical Footing Subdrain Detail
Earth Consultants, Inc.
it' 'p\`. 44"
Igi
Earth Consultants Inc.
( , ` .� cn otc c hnic:d lin}irnY rs.G�olo�fists&I V ironnu•n:al ti<iontti
September 27, 1989 - E-4563
Mr. Jim Garrison
Bruce Blume and Company
1100 Eastlake, Suite 210
Seattle, Washington 98109
Dear Mr. Garrison:
We are pleased to submit herewith our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, Eland
Distribution Facility, Oaksdale Avenue Southwest, Renton, Washington." This report
presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering
analyses. The purpose and scope of our study was outlined in our July 19, 1989 proposal.
Our study indicates that the site is underlain by soft compressible material consisting
predominantly of clayey silts to a depth of approximately eleven (11) feet.
Based-on the encountered conditions, and the results of our analyses, we believe that the
proposed structures can be supported on conventional footings provided that a surcharge
program is first satisfactorily completed.
These recommendations, along with other geotechnically related aspects of the project, are
discussed in more detail in the text of the attached report.
We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you during this initial phase of
project development, and we look forward to working with you in the future phases as the
project comes to fruition. In the meantime, should you or your consultants have any
. questions about the content of this report, or if we can be of further assistance, please call.
Very truly yours,
E• 'TH CONSULTANTS, INC.
\ , L___,
Glen Mann, P.E.
Vice President
GM/NTD/sar
1805.136th Place N.E.,Suite 101,Bellevue,Washington 98005
222 E.26th Street,Suite 101,Tacoma,Washington 98411-9998
Bellevue(206)643.3780 Seattle(206)464.1584 FAX(206)746-0860 Tacoma(206)272.6608
'PORTANT INFORMATIC
ABOUT YOUR
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about
face conditions than any other factor. As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions, their likely reaction to
subsurface problems can be, their frequency and extent proposed construction activity,and appropriate founda-
have been lessened considerably in recent years,due in tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual
large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist,
The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how
the Geosciences. qualified,and no subsurface exploration program, no
The following suggestions and observations are offered matter how comprehensive,can reveal what is hidden by
help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, earth, rock and time.The actual interface between mate-
tocost-overruns and other costly headaches that can rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report
occur during a construction project. indicates.Actual conditions in areas not sampled may
differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the
unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their
A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their
REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnical consultants through the construction stage, to iden-
tify variances,conduct additional tests which may be
OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed, and to recommend solutions to problems
A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur-
faceencountered on site.
exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
set of project-specific factors. These typically include:
the general nature of the structure involved, its size and CAN CHANGE
configuration; the location of the structure on the site
and its orientation; physical concomitants such as Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly-
access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities, changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi-
and the level of additional risk which the client assumed neering report is based on conditions which existed at
by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory the time of subsurface exploration, construction decisions
program. To help avoid costly problems, consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose
geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo-
which change subsequent to the date of the report may technical consultant to learn if additional tests are
affect its recommendations. advisable before construction starts.
Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and
otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not natural events such as floods, earthquakes or ground-
be used: water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions
•When the nature of the proposed structure is and,thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical
changed, for example, if an office building will be report. The geotechnical engineer should be kept
erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refriger- apprised of any such events,and should be consulted to
ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- determine if additional tests are necessary.
frigerated one;
•when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE
structure is altered; PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES
•when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS
structure is modified;
•when there is a change of ownership, or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet
• for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals. A report pre-
Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade-
which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor,or even some other
ered in their report's development have changed. consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise,
this report was prepared expressly for the client involved
and expressly for purposes indicated by the client. Use
MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose,or by the client
ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi-
vidual other than the client should apply this report for its
Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical
only at those points where samples are taken,when engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose
they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring
sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
OAKSDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST
RENTON, WASHINGTON
E-4563
INTRODUCTION
Protect Description
The subject site is located in Renton and is bounded to the north by Oaksdale Avenue
Southwest near the intersection of Monster Road, to the east by an existing cardboard
manufacturing plant, and by Union Pacific railroad to the west and south (approximately as
indicated on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1). The site is low lying currently about six feet below
Oaksdale Avenue Southwest. The general area appears to have been leveled and partially
filled in the past.
The purpose of this study is to explore the existing subsurface conditions at the site and, on
this basis, to develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site development.
At the time our study was performed, the site, proposed building locations, and our
exploratory locations were approximately as shown on the Boring and Test Pit Location Plan,
Plate 2.
We understand from our discussions with your architect, Mr. Bob Fadden, that you plan to
construct two warehouses, one of approximately two hundred and twenty thousand (220,000)
square feet in plan area, and the second approximately forty-eight thousand (48,000) square
feet in plan area. The structures are to be concrete tilt-up panel construction and will have
a dock-high floor. Although no specific design information is currently available, based on
our experience with similar construction, we have estimated the maximum total dead plus live
• loads to be as follows:
• Wall loads - 3-1/2 Ups per lineal foot
• Column loads - 150 kips
• Slab loads - 300 pounds per square foot (psf)
If any of the above design criteria change, we should be consulted to review the
recommendations contained in this report. In any case, we recommend that Earth
Consultants, Inc. (ECI) be retained to perform a general review of the final design.
Scope of Services
We performed this study in general accordance with the scope of services outlined in our July
19, 1989 proposal. On this basis, our report addresses:
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 2
• Subsurface soil and groundwater conditions;
• Suitability of existing on-site materials for use as fill, or recommendations for
imported fill materials;
• Site preparation, grading and earthwork procedures, including details of fill
placement and compaction;
• Short-term and long-term groundwater management and erosion control
measures;
• Foundation bearing capacity and resistance of lateral loads for conventional
foundations;
• Estimates of potential total and differential settlement magnitudes and their
rates;
• Surcharge fill construction and monitoring program; and
• Parking area and access roadway design pavement sections.
This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only for the exclusive
use of Bruce Blume and Associates and their representatives. 'No other warranty, expressed
or implied, is made. We recommend that this report, in its entirety, be included in the
project contract documents for the information of the contractor.
SITE CONDITIONS
Surface
At the time of our field exploration, the site was covered by dense long field grass. The site
is essentially flat and is relatively low-lying, currently about six feet below the bordering road.
No structures are present on site, nor is there any evidence that any have been on the
property in the past. Wetland areas are apparently present in the central portion of the
property. These areas were relatively dry with no evidence of stagnant water, indicating that
the underlying material is providing good drainage towards the Green River. We understand
from our discussions that these areas will be kept in their natural state.
Subsurface
The site was explored by drilling three (3) borings and excavating sixteen (16) test pits at the
approximate locations shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the Boring logs Plates 4 through
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 3
6, and the Test Pit logs, Plates 7 through 15, for a more detailed description of the
conditions encountered at each location explored. A description of the field exploration
methods and laboratory testing program is included in the appendix of this report. The
following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered.
All of our exploratory borings and excavations in the building areas encountered a thin
surficial layer of loose silty sand topsoil. This layer, typically about six to eight inches thick,
contains a variety of small roots and rounded gravel. It is unsuitable for support of
foundations, floor slabs or pavements and cannot be used as a structural fill. Further, it
should not be mixed with materials that are to be used as a structural fill.
Underlying the surficial topsoil layer, we generally encountered a loose to medium dense
silty sand containing some gravel, which becomes silt in some localized areas. Beneath this
material we found interlayered soft to stiff silty clay and clayey silt, and loose to dense silty
sand and sand. Typically, the density or consistency increased with depth. The clayey
materials are susceptible to compression under load.
We also excavated five Test Pits (TP-101 through 105) in the knoll located just to the
southeast of the southern building pad. The purpose was to determine the suitability of the
in-place materials for use as a structural fill elsewhere on the site. Beneath an
approximately six inch thick surficial sod layer, we found medium dense to dense silty sand
extending to the depths explored. The lower materials appeared to be a weathered
sandstone. While these soils are suitable for support of a conventional warehouse-type
structure, they are not suitable for use as a structural fill. In our opinion, the soil contains
too large an amount of fines (silt and clay sized particles) and is highly susceptible to
degradation when wet.
Groundwater
The groundwater levels observed while drilling and excavating range from approximately ten
•to eleven feet below the existing surface and are shown on the boring and test pit logs. The
groundwater level is not considered static; thus, one may expect fluctuations in the level
depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors.
Generally, the water level is higher in the wetter winter months, typically October through
May.
•
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
Based on the results of our study, it is evident the site requires a substantial amount of fill
to raise the site to design subgrade elevation. Since there is no on-site fill source, the fill
must by necessity be imported from elsewhere. Placement of this fill, combined with the
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 4
proposed building loads, is estimated to cause a relatively large amount of settlement in the
soft compressible soils immediately underlying the site. Such settlement is likely to lead to
structural damage. To avoid this, we recommend you employ a surcharge fill to pre-induce
as much settlement as possible before construction begins.
While it would be most helpful to surcharge the pavement and parking areas of•the site as
well as the building pads, this is not normally a standard, or practical, activity. We do,
however, strongly recommend the site fills be placed and compacted under strict engineering
control to verify they are competent. This will help reduce the settlement potential.
In our opinion, once the site fills are placed and a surcharge fill program has been
satisfactorily completed, the proposed buildings can be constructed generally as planned. We
recommend they be supported on conventional spread footings bearing on the compacted
structural fill. Post-construction settlement are expected to be relatively small and within this
form of structure's tolerable limits.
Current development plans call for the protection of an existing "wetland" area located in the
generally central part of the site. Since site fills will closely border this wetland area, you
must construct competent and stable fill slopes and protect the toes of the slopes from water
softening. This can be accomplished by appropriate vegetation or a protective surfacing
material.
Because of the relatively soft and compressible soils underlying most of the site, utility
installation may pose some minor construction difficulties. We recommend all utilities be
provided with flexible connections to allow for settlement related movements.
Although groundwater was not encountered at shallow depth, and considering the site grade
will be raised by about ten feet, we believe it prudent to include both short and long term
drainage control measures in design and construction. Such measures should include, but
need not be limited to, perimeter footing drains, downspout tightlines, site grading, shallow •
• swales and earthen berms.
We explored a portion of the knoll which is located just to the southeast of the site as a
potential fill source. Our exploration indicated the materials are very fine grained and
susceptible to severe disturbance when wet. As a result, we do not believe they are suitable
as a fill source. However, in the event you plan to construct an additional building in this
area, the soils should prove suitable for support of a tilt-up type structure, particularly if built
in the drier summer months. The in-place soils will likely require some degree of
recompaction prior to such construction, and will need to be protected against the elements.
These, and other geotechnically related aspects of the project are discussed in more detail
in the following sections of this report.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 5
Site Preparation and General Earthwork
Stripping and Clearing: The building and parking areas should be stripped and cleared of
all existing vegetation, existing utilities, and any other deleterious material. We estimate that
on. the average, stripping depth of about six inches will be repaired. Stripped materials
should be removed from the site and disposed. They should not be mixed with materials to
be used as structural fill.
Subgrade Preparation: Following the stripping and excavation operations, structural fill can
be used to bring the building site to the desired subgrade. A typical detail for a structural
fill mat is provided on Plate 21. The soil surface where structural fill, foundations, or slabs
are to be placed should be proofrolled and compacted to a reasonably non-yielding condition.
Proofrolling helps to determine the presence and approximate areal extent of any soft or
unstable soils. If any soft or unstable areas are encountered, they should be moisture-
conditioned as appropriate then recompacted. If after recompaction they remain soft or
unstable, they should be overexcavated to a depth that will provide a stable base. Typical-
ly, a depth of two to three feet is adequate for this purpose. The overexcavated unsuitable
material should be removed, disposed and replaced with structural fill. These operations
should be performed under the continuous observation of ECI's representative.
Structural Fill: Structural fill is defined as any fill placed around or beneath buildings, floor
slabs, pavements, walkways, or any other load-bearing areas. Ideally, but particularly for wet
weather construction, structural fill should comprise an organic-free, granular, free-draining
material with a maximum particle size of three inches. It should contain less than 5 percent
fines (silt and clay-sized particles passing the number 200 mesh sieve). During dry weather,
any organic-free, compactible material meeting the above maximum size criterion may be
used.
Structural fill under footings, floor slabs, and pavements should be placed in thin horizontal
lifts. Lifts should not exceed eight inches in loose thickness for heavy compactors, and four
.inches for hand-held compactors. Each lift should be compacted to at least 95 percent of
maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Method D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor).
Fill under walkways should be placed in similar thin horizontal lifts and, with the exception
of the upper twelve (12) inches, be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum density.
The top twelve (12) inches should be compacted to at least 95 percent maximum density.
Any fill or native soils disturbed during construction should either be recompacted or
overexcavated and replaced with compacted structural fill or crushed rock. To facilitate the
compaction process, we recommend that all fills, including the on-site soils if used, be placed
at or near their optimum moisture content. If fill soils are on the wet side of optimum they
are likely to be difficult to compact. In this case they should then be replaced with a free-
draining granular import fill, or should be dried until they can be adequately compacted.
Drying can be achieved by aeration or by intermixing lime or cement powder to absorb
excess moisture.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
•
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 6
As part of our site exploration, we dug four test pits in the lower slopes of a knoll located
just to the southeast of the site. These pits were dug in an effort to determine the suitability
of the in-place soils as a structural fill material on the lower lying site. Based on the
conditions exposed, we do not believe the material on the knoll are suitable for use as a
structural fill. They contain a significant amount of fines (silt and clay sized particles) and
are highly susceptible to deterioration when wet. Excavation, movement and replacement
and compaction are likely to be difficult, if not impossible. Thus, it is virtually certain that
you will need to import materials form an outside source.
When you have retained an earthwork contractor, and he has selected a pit from which he
intends to import fill materials, you should retain us to visit and examine the pit, to acquire
representative fill source samples and to perform the appropriate laboratory testing to
determine the materials suitability. Providing this is done early enough in the scheme of
construction, it will be possible to modify fill or compaction recommendations or even to
change fill the source, if necessary, before you are committed to performing the earthwork.
You should provide a contingency in your budget and schedule to accommodate this critical
service.
Foundations
Based on the encountered site conditions and the preliminary building design criteria, we
believe that conventional footings supported on compacted structural fill can be used,
provided that a surcharge program to induce settlement is successfully performed. The
surcharge program is discussed in more detail in a subsequent paragraph.
Once the preload program is successfully completed, the conventional footings can be
designed on the basis of the following criteria:
• Allowable bearing pressure, including all = 2,500 psf
dead and live loads.
• Minimum depth of perimeter footing; below = 18 inches
adjacent final exterior grade.
• Minimum depth of interior footings; below = 12 inches
top of floor slab.
• Minimum width of wall footings = 18 inches
• Minimum lateral dimension of column = 24 inches
footings
• Estimated total post-construction = 1 inch, or less
settlement
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 7
o Estimated post-construction differential = 1/2 inch, or less
settlement; across building width
A one-third increase in the above allowable bearing pressures can be used when considering
short-term transitory wind or seismic loads.
Lateral loads can also be resisted by friction between the foundation and the supporting
compacted fill subgrade or by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the
foundations. For the latter, the foundations must be poured "neat" against the existing soil
or backfilled with a compacted fill meeting the requirements of structural fill. We
recommend the following parameters be used in design:
• Passive pressure = 300 pcf equivalent fluid weight
• Coefficient of friction = 0.35
As mentioned earlier, we also explored the lower portion of the knoll located just to the
southeast of the site. While the materials are not suitable for use as a structural fill in wet
weather, the area is capable of supporting construction of similar nature. In our opinion, a
"typical" concrete tilt-up building can be constructed on this area provided care is exercised
during design and construction. Such a building could be supported on conventional spread
footings bearing on the carefully recompacted and densified in-place soils. The design
parameters outlined above should prove applicable. However, we recommend you retain us
to evaluate any design plan before proceeding to allow us to verify that the conditions can
support the proposed construction.
Dock-High Retaining Walls
We understand that dock-high retaining walls may be constructed along portions of the
perimeter of the buildings. We recommend they be designed to resist lateral load imposed
by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of forty (40) pcf if they are allowed to rotate 0.002
times the height of the wall. If the walls are prevented from rotating, we recommend that
they be designed to resist lateral loads of sixty (60) pcf equivalent fluid weight. These values
assume that no vehicular, floor or other surcharge loads will act on the wall. If such loads
are to apply, they should be added to the above design lateral pressures.
We assume that the walls will be backfilled with a suitable free-draining material. Typically,
wall backfill should consist of materials similar to structural fill. Wall backfill should have
a maximum size of three inches, be organic-free, and have a maximum of three percent fines
(materials passing the No. 200 mesh sieve). Twenty-five (25) to seventy (70) percent of the
particles should pass the No. 4 mesh sieve. A typical wall backfill detail is provided as
Plate 19.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 8
As an alternative to free-draining wall backfill, you may wish to consider the use of a
geotextile drainage product such as "Miradrain". In either case, we recommend the
installation of a drain line along the base of each wall. These drains are discussed in more
detail in the Site Drainage section of this report.
Slab-on-Grade Floors
Slab-on-grade floors can be used with conventional foundations provided that the preload
program is satisfactorily completed. The slab should be supported on compacted structural
fill. Any fill or native soils disturbed by construction activity should either be recompacted
or excavated and replaced with compacted structural fill or crushed rock.
To allow for moisture build-up on the subgrade, the slab should be provided with a capillary
break consisting of a minimum of four inches of free-draining sand or gravel. We also
recommend that a vapor barrier, such as a 6-mil plastic membrane, be placed over the
capillary break beneath the slab to reduce both water vapor transmission through the slab
and the resultant moisture related damage to interior furnishings.
Two inches of damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during
construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. It will also help prevent cement paste
bleeding down into the underlying capillary break through joints or tears in the vapor barrier.
An alternative means of slab support, if recompaction efforts are thwarted by poor weather,
is the use of a cement-bound granular fill pad. This would incorporate intermixing between
about four and seven percent portland cement powder, by weight, into the upper twelve
inches of the dock high site fill. The cement-bound fill is then appropriately moisture-
conditioned and compacted. This will provide an approximately one foot thick layer of
essentially weak concrete on which to build the slab. It is not unusual to achieve twenty-
eight (28) day compressive strengths in excess of twelve hundred 1200( ) pounds per square
inch with this form of construction. Typically, the cement bound fill will provide an
allowable soil bearing in excess of three thousand (3,000) psf. If you wish to pursue this
option further, we will be available to provide more specific design parameters.
Settlements
Based on the nature of the materials underlying the site, the need to place a substantial
amount of structural fill to achieve design site grade, and given the proposed form of
construction, the buildings are likely to undergo a relatively large amount of settlement. This
settlement is of sufficient magnitude to cause structural damage.
The surcharge program should be designed to pre-consolidate the compressible soils found
in the upper eleven (11) feet of the site, such that the surcharge would apply loads greater
than those possible under normal fill and building loads. Resulting settlements from the
surcharge program should be about the same magnitude as the estimated settlements. A
Earth Consultants, Inc.
• r
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 9
smaller settlement than estimated could be interpreted that the clayey silt have been pre-
consolidated and soil conditions are better than anticipated. Conversely, a larger settlement
than that estimated could be interpreted that the soil conditions are worse than anticipated,
and additional measures should be taken to obtain satisfactory results.
Surcharge Program
We estimate the settlement under the combined building and fill load to be on the order of
six (6) to seven (7) inches. Differential settlement could be about half this magnitude across
the building width. To avoid this, we recommend you perform a preload surcharge program
to pre-induce as much settlement as possible before construction begins.
Current plans call for up to about ten feet of fill, generating a load on the order of twelve
hundred (1,200) psf on the original site subgrade. This fill load will cause a certain degree
of, settlement to occur before any building is constructed. In addition, there will be the
proposed floor slab load, presently estimated at about three hundred (300) psf. Although
settlements under this load are substantially smaller than those generated by the fill, they are
still of sufficient magnitude to cause slab damage. The damage is typically in the form of
slab cracking, warping or separation. To prevent settlement under the slab load, the
surcharge fill should be of a weight that is at least equal to, but preferably greater than, the
slab load. In this case, a minimum surcharge thickness of two and one-half feet will
approximately equal the maximum proposed floor load. To further decrease the potential
for post-surcharge and construction settlement, an additional six inches to one foot of
surcharge can be added.
One means of reducing the cost of a surcharge program is to use a "rolling surcharge". This
can be achieved on two separate ways. Either the surcharge fill material is to be used as
a structural fill elsewhere on the site after the surcharge program is completed, or the
surcharge fill can be used first on one building pad, then on the next. This approach
requires less surcharge material than that required to settle both building pads at the same
time.
Surcharge material should conform to the requirements of structural fill, described earlier in
this text, if the material is to be used as a fill elsewhere on the site. Regardless, the fill
should have a minimum unit weight of one hundred and twenty (120) pcf. The surcharge
should extend for a distance of at least ten (10) feet beyond the building perimeter. From
this point, the surcharge fill should be sloped at an inclination of 1H:1V, or flatter, down to
the site grade.
Based on the conditions observed in the field, and the results of our selective laboratory tests
and our engineering analyses, we estimate the settlements induced by the combined site and
surcharge fills will take between about ten (10) and twelve (12) weeks to complete.
However, the only reasonable accurate means of verifying the time rate is to perform a
surcharge monitoring program. This program will include setting settlement monitoring
markers on the existing site subgrade before any fill is placed, then monitoring them through
Earth Consultants, Inc.
•
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 10
completion of fill placement, then on until settlements cease or are considered within the
building's tolerable limits. More specific details of this program are presented below:
• Settlement markers should be placed on the native subgrade of each building pad
before any fill is placed. We recommend six markers within the larger building
footprint and four in the smaller. ECI can supply and install these markers. (A
typical detail is provided on Plate 20.)
• A baseline reading is obtained on each marker and is referenced to a temporary
benchmark located on a feature that will be unaffected by the fill-induced
settlements.
• The structural and surcharge fills are then placed. Settlement readings are taken at
relatively short intervals during this process, since this phase generates a relatively
large amount of rapid settlement.
• Once the fill operation is completed, readings are obtained on a periodic basis,
typically on a weekly to bi-weekly basis, until the settlement ceases or is judged by
the geotechnical engineer to be within the structure's tolerable limits.
• Each set of settlement readings are plotted graphically against time to determine
the magnitude and rate of activity, and are matched against the predicted magnitudes
and rates. This allows us to verify the accuracy of earlier estimates and to make any
appropriate modifications.
We recommend ECI be retained to acquire the settlement readings. If you prefer to use
another entity to collect these readings, we recommend you provide the data to us as quickly
after their acquisition as possible for plotting and interpretation. This will help avoid any
misinterpretation or misunderstanding about the success of the surcharge program.
You should also understand that completion of primary settlements under the surcharge
program does not complete total settlement. The clayey soils underlying this site are also
likely to undergo long-term secondary settlement. This form of settlement continues over
a much longer period, perhaps several years. This form of settlement occurs as air and
water is slowly squeezed out of the soil by the fill and building load. The greater the weight
of the surcharge fill, the less impact this is likely to have on the structure. Secondary
settlements can be as much as about fifty percent of the primary settlement. Your structural
engineer must consider this in his design.
One last concern in the settlement monitoring program concerns the maintenance of
settlement markers. Given that there will be a significant earthwork operation on this site
to construct the site and surcharge fills, there will be a lot of earthwork traffic. This traffic
can be a significant threat to the integrity of the settlement markers. In our experience,
earthwork equipment (dozers and trucks) often demolish markers at a very high rate. This
adds to the project costs in that they need to be replaced and makes the information
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 11
obtained less reliable. To avoid this scenario, we recommend your project specifications
include a requirement that the earthwork contractor is required to immediately replace any
damaged settlement marker and have the settlement readings re-obtained at his own cost!
This has, in the past, helped maintain the integrity of the monitoring program and has made
the earthwork contractor more conscious of the client's needs.
Excavations and Slopes
While no major excavations or slope construction efforts are anticipated in construction, you
should be aware that in no case should excavation slopes, including utility trenches, be
greater than the limits specified in local, state and federal safety regulations. Temporary cuts
greater than four feet in depth should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1H:1V.
If slopes of this inclination, or flatter, cannot be constructed, or if excavations greater than
four feet in depth are required, temporary shoring may be necessary. This shoring will help
protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workmen in the
excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide geotechnical
shoring design criteria, if requested.
Since it is apparent that fill slopes will be constructed and extend out to the edges of the
wetlands, we recommend the toes of these slopes be protected. A vegetative cover, or
placement of a graded rock filter material, should be sufficient for this purpose.
All temporary slopes should be protected against the elements. Installation of a shallow
swale or low earthen berm along the crest of each slope should be adequate to collect and
redirect water to a positive and permenant discharge. The slope face should be covered
with a pegged or sandbagged in-place impervious sheeting.
Over the long term, the slopes should be seeded as quickly after construction as possible
with a suitable rapid growth and deep rooted vegetation. Your landscape architect can
provide a suitable seed mix. The seed should be maintained in-place with a sprayed mulch,
with the possible addition of a pegged in-place jute matting or geotechnical fabric. This will
help keep the seed and mulch on the slope surface until the root mat has an opportunity to
germinate and take hold.
Rockeries
If you elect to use a rockery to protect the perimeter of the site, you should understand that
a rockery is not a retaining wall in the sense one would consider a reinforced concrete
retaining wall. A rockery is primarily to protect the exposed soil surface against erosion and
weather damage. However, if a rockery is properly constructed, by virtue of its mass it will
provide some degree of retention. The larger the rocks used, the more mass and, therefore,
the greater the retaining ability.
Rockery construction is, to a large extent, an art not entirely controllable by engineering
methods. Because of this, it is imperative that your rockeries be constructed by an
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 12
experienced contractor with the equipment and capability to construct rockeries of a similar
nature to those you require built. To help you in this respect, we have provided a current
copy of the Associated Rockery Contractors (ARC) Standard Rockery Construction
Guidelines as Appendix C. We recommend that your contractor closely adhere to the
recommendations contained in that document. In the event that a rockery exceeds the
maximum height acceptable to the City or County, or if the rockery is to be constructed
against a new fill, we will be available to provide the necessary engineering and monitoring
services.
Site Drainage
We do not expect the site groundwater levels will present any major construction-related
problems. However, the site should be graded such that surface water is directed off the
building site. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs or
pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be roller-sealed
at night to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades
should allow for drainage away from the building foundations. We suggest that the ground
be sloped at a gradient of 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the
buildings except in areas that are to be paved.
If seepage is encountered in foundation excavations during construction, we recommend that
you slope the bottom of the excavation to one or more shallow sump pits. The collected
water can then be pumped from these pits to a positive and permanent discharge, such as
a nearby storm drain.
Although the groundwater level was recorded several feet below the existing site grade, and
considering the site grade in the building pad areas will be raised several feet, we still firmly
believe drainage control measures installed at the time of construction are the most
economical insurance against long term water or seepage related problems. Because of this,
we recommend you install footing drains around the building perimeter. These drains should
consist of a four-inch minimum diameter, perforated or slotted, rigid drain pipe laid at, or
just below, the invert of the footing with a gradient sufficient to initiate flow. The drain line
should be bedded on, surrounded by, and covered with a free-draining washed rock or other
free-draining granular material.
Once the drains are installed, with the exception of the upper twelve (12) inches, the
excavation can be backfilled with a granular fill material. The surficial twelve (12) inches
of fill should consist of compacted and relatively impermeable soil. It can be separated from
the underlying more granular drainage material by a layer of building paper or visqueen.
The surface should be sloped to drain away from the building wall. Alternatively, the surface
can be sealed with asphalt or concrete paving. A typical detail is provided on Plate 22.
Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain
system. All roof downspouts must be separately tightlined to discharge. We recommend you
•
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 13
install sufficient cleanouts at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the
footing drain and downspout tightline systems.
We recommend the appropriate locations of subsurface drains, if needed, be established
during grading operations by ECI's representative, at which time the seepage areas, if
present, may be more clearly defined.
Based on the general grain size, we have estimated a coefficient of permeability (K) for the
materials overlying the relatively impermeable clayey soils. The K value is likely to be on
the order of 2.4x10'2 inches per hour. For the underlying clayey materials, we estimate the
K value to be more on the order of 1.2x10'3 inches per hour.
Utility Support
Utility lines installed in fills or native soils should use either APWA Specifications 61-2.02
and 61-2.03, or the specific manufacturers' recommendations, for both rigid and flexible pipe
bedding. Utility trench backfill is a major concern in preventing settlement activity along
utility alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility
line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped
to make sure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed
and hand tamped to about twelve (12) inches above the crown of the pipe before any heavy
compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be
placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve (12) inches. Trench fill, where
not supporting a structure, should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry
density, as determined by ASTM Test Method D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). The upper
twelve (12) inches should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum density.
If utility trench excavations encounter soft and easily compressible soils at invert elevations
that cannot be remedied by placement of the bedding material, it may be necessary to
perform some overexcavation and ,replacement of unsuitable materials. Typically, an
.overexcavation depth of about two feet is sufficient to provide a "bridge" across soft and
compressible soils. The overexcavation backfill should be crushed rock or clean compact
structural fill. In addition, to help accommodate any post-construction settlement, we
recommend all underground utility lines include flexible joints.
The trench width in soft soils should be at least three pipe diameters. This will allow for
placement of sufficient bedding and/or fill material to laterally support the pipe. Depending
on the actual nature of the in-place soils, it might also be prudent to wrap the bedding
material in a geotechnical fabric. This determination should be made at the time of
construction. However, you should include a contingency in your budget and schedule to
accommodate this possibility.
We also recommend you consult us once the final utility layout has been determined to
reevaluate the above recommendations. At that time it might prove possible to more
accurately determine the specific nature of utility trench treatment.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 14
Pavement Areas
The adequacy of site pavements is strictly related to the condition of the underlying
subgrade. If this is inadequate, no matter what pavement section is constructed, settlement
or movement of the subgrade will be reflected up through the paving. In order to avoid
this situation, we recommend the subgrade be treated and prepared as described in the Site
Preparation section of this report. This means at least the top twelve (12) inches of the
subgrade should be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum dry density (per ASTM D-
1557-78). It is possible that some localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade may still
exist after this process. If so, the unsuitable materials may require overexcavation and
replacement with a compacted structural fill or a crushed rock. Depending on the nature
of the prepared subgrade at the time of construction, it may also be necessary to use a
geotextile fabric to separate pavement materials from the underlying subgrade and to help
strengthen the pavement section. A Mirafi 500X, or approved equivalent, should be suitable
for this purpose.
As mentioned earlier, because of the amounts of fill to be placed over this site and the
settlement susceptibility of the underlying native soils, long-term settlements in both building
and pavement areas should be expected. The building area settlements can be controlled
to some degree by the use of a surcharge fill program. While it is not normally an
economically feasible step to surcharge the parking and roadway areas, we recommend you
give this some consideration. The greater the loads applied to the pavement area fill before
construction, the lower the risk of settlement damage to the pavements over time. This
option might be achievable if a rolling surcharge program is used.
On the assumption that it will not be economically feasible to surcharge the pavement areas,
we urge you to make sure that the fill in these areas is placed and compacted under our
full-time observation and of suitable material. On this basis, we have provided you with two
alternative pavement sections for the lightly trafficked access and parking areas, and for the
.more heavily trafficked truck access and loading areas. In the more lightly-loaded areas we
recommend the following:
• Two inches of Asphalt Concrete (AC) over four inches of Crushed Rock Base
(CRB) material, or
• Two inches of AC over three inches of Asphalt Treated Base (ATB) material.
For the heavier truck-traffic areas, we have made some assumptions about site usage,
pavement life and site traffic. We assumed the pavement life to be ten (10) years, that
truck traffic would be essentially confined to one lane in each direction, and that traffic
could double within the pavement life. We estimate the pavement subgrade would have an
equivalent "R-Value" of about sixty (60). On the basis of these estimated criteria, we used
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 15
the State of Washington Flexible Pavement Design Method to determine a suitable pavement
design section. As a result of this analysis, we recommend the following:
• Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB, or
• Three inches of AC over four and one-half inches of ATB.
If the above design assumptions appear incorrect to you, or if you have more detailed and
accurate traffic criteria, please provide the information to us so that we can re-analyze these
heavier pavement sections. If we are not provided further data, we will assume these data
in our analysis to be correct.
Because of the general nature of the site soils and the time of construction, we recommend
you select the ATB pavement section. This will not only provide you with a competent
"blacktop" surface that will help protect the site from construction activity, but will also
provide a clean, dry and competent surface on which to store and protect construction
materials. It has also been our experience that in spite of its slightly higher initial cost, this
form of surfacing requires considerably less maintenance either during or after a winter
construction period.
LIMITATIONS
Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective
laboratory testing, engineering analyses, the design information provided us, and our
experience and engineering judgement. The conclusions and recommendations are
professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill
ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar
conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied.
.The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the
borings and test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between borings and test pits may
vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory
locations may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear, ECI should
be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them
in writing prior to proceeding with the construction.
Additional Services
We recommend that ECI be retained to perform a general review of the final design and
specifications. This will allow us to verify that the earthwork and foundation
recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design plans and
in the construction specifications.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Eland Distribution Facility E-4563
September 27, 1989 Page 16
We also recommend that ECI be retained to provide geotechnical services during
construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or
recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from
those anticipated prior to the start of construction. Because of the settlement-sensitive
nature of this project we do not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundations
or earthwork unless we are retained to provide these services.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
APPENDIX A
E-4563
FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
Our field exploration was performed on August 15, August 22, and September 13, 1989.
Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling three (3) borings to a maximum
depth of thirty nine (39) feet below the existing grade and excavating seventeen (17) test
pits to a maximum depth of eleven (11) feet below existing grade. The borings were drilled
using a truck-mounted Acker drill rig. Continuous flight, hollow stem augers were used to
advance and support the boreholes during sampling.
Approximate boring and test pit locations were determined by taping from property corners.
The boring and test pit elevations were determined by interpolating between contour lines
shown on a Topographic and Wetlands Survey by Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. for job
#89219, dated 6/19/89. The locations and elevations of the borings and test pits should be
considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate
locations are shown on the Boring and Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2.
The field exploration was continuously monitored by a geotechnical engineer from our firm
who classified the soils encountered and maintained a log of each boring and test pit,
obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site
features. All samples were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil
Classification System which is presented on Plate 3, Legend. Logs of the borings are
presented on Plates 4 through 6; and the Test Pit Logs are presented on Plates 7 through
15. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the
laboratory examination and selective tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the
logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions
may be more gradual.
In each boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed at selected intervals in
general accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1586. The split spoon samples were
• driven with a one hundred forty (140) pound hammer freely falling thirty (30) inches. The
number of blows required to drive the last twelve (12) inches of penetration are called the
"N-value". This value helps to characterize the site soils and is used in our engineering
analyses.
The density or consistency of the soil exposed in the test pits was estimated based on the
effort required to excavate the soil, the stability of the trench walls, and other factors.
Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our,laboratory
for further examination and testing.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
ztrn+_ �•• _ •ruulr Lauv JI •
S LAST WOOD �+/ u•.
O \Y , • v 0 \vn
I' I� flrig` s I
•�=` n'°� ; ' > `S FOUNTAINI ST�r:+�'r �lz•..'l� Q'.Q �� C:\'FA
.I';+ di12.�H_ ST .n 5 a LEO I T .s• �= Qv P x:S
ti S s y r �- MTH ST \1 2T y ��, ee •G 113TH
✓y\\ ¢ I ST NI ` 5 41 S 14TP.y ST a R Sp �'s�rtr:s M AVDN a a Q\'' o —<T--
\cam rr4r,, gs Gr N 1, z p 5 115T11u) ST
• '? \\.o Sj 4uS`4 1\y'gr• L• < < 6 S N 115TH J (� 5 IIS'r),' PE m
e,+\\s .Se, r N. sLJ 4t ' s'16TH ST ••_I` ...1 a+
\ �p9 ;S a s C >. $ '®ST 9 s nnHST .y , S S
S IIE11TT _ST\\_ o 7. 1n X I IlZ 'IBrH P1 .. //Sr -z-
'.-� \ N4r R wA LACE n T a S IIEI -ST o— In i, C m I
c Sr r i z S I no-PL - ..41TH AV 1 " AV Q�< Spa ry rn_....
F N.3 . ''%`\ .o NI9TH 5 S.119T11 Sr d N >
uINIPfR ST
4.0 S. sr 120TH ST ti
fy _ I $ 120�.,....r 1.. 4 i 1211TH
A 4n�ND \s.
S S 1215T$T I I z N r Q > �q•:('i:'i2O1."P- IZ I
4 ST '' \� f11 9y0 al > tD C 117ND ST S. > r 4v •G.S� t T S 5 12NQ to
•
����� J` \ ( JlO in aI 1 /- tt w 'O wSKVILPY
®N sT \\e"
I s I°i s 124tr,) � 4:.Kt• s:�K WY
F, CI a S I2STH ST 1'1"5.,• .4:� CEM�Fs I x a
~ N F N „El•
• f > �
EAkL1AGlOM ''�%'; •_':'(i�\ 1 __ -0 5 < N i .n_\2iT1 s ,*r
N
tip-P'Amr,0. �� S I r4. to IT7 pL tie -s > y�i;�'L"l�.I l
T 4 f i_.+? i 1 I'.11 ... F Iy rz„ S. 179THQ ST i >
(i'.f.l, ) ,'':�}Li'� ;..,.' \ $T /� 1D I '>5••129TM'- Pl. S 129TH ST 6
• 0 9(�'i ;41441;1""
' ff' '':aR B S 13OTM `O+ST z 513oHwTO
• ��yi ;,y ;h�' y �90 I3ISTa-z S I m LANCSTON RRD�� AL m I•,• ,� 02 1 sit. ALT 9 ,P
s1 /•`l ,,,f'I�' P PANELA T a.
lann :}' S�♦ oc �Oy� F 132NosrS I 33 rs;se..,15TTT i • S
1 aD 5.`� +. /;; CD
• 0 ,\ ;�+ ,;1•i.. MAN 1F S
s + .i. IRF s ix
35tH
S1 135TH�,Al ` ` w /,y:' 'e seer, L .J W sl
his Saa" � .':'). ..?..,:. * :
m _X_ ti '""- 0..• D�itis,.;.\ ;-web �..r--s 1ierH ST---,—�.• �<
a S' S� y- 11 . -v',J'•,''`a''.'•s�!'fidyi.•,�' ,':;t .r'�� I ram..—� y,�
F • 1:'sVAI;. -s•lt, ;,.lio1cjoj�'rieh. BEtUar "j�igN'-71A' I\
in '* - >.-y"• 1A S C r '.A<<T +•\'.r,; 9 . �.
�, ->0 y.k `M ' r :01 y.' 1."PE',�.•r`0 ;\`RIVER j"'el--T EARL
$-,ta2ND �' s >I NO Ll8 '�% ' 5 ''
sip--- o ST. B;I a.. \ �. JCT f-" 'SITE I
1 ills
1 ;ill g N \� :. •:S::i•: ':,
• 1�44 M Nii:::ii„k.,.... ....,verns.1,43.0sprc: -\\.'
$ 143H ;EARLIH,GTOtlE;4`;' I
1 V1 6 Ida H'ST .;:.: ;• 'i01r%COURSE' s-
I •1- . m T •I f'TOfN t• V
5 1467H ST 1 .LO I, . :i AA' '..;'\\ 1 '1?... i .,t .
• r▪ :-y � c �fta1]
CI
Reference:
King County / Map 34
By Thomas Brothers Maps
Dated 1988
• Vicinity Map
. Earth Consultants Inc. Eland Distribution Facility
�1 ,I ) ek,Se,tlnkallit,elneerS.( ,.ki4LSIS6l'l1VIII"Inrll:llscientists King County,Washington
Proj. No. 4563 • Drwn. GLS Date Sept '89 Checked ND Date 9/22/89 Plate I
LOCATED
A. SEE
j— FURTHER
/—'_}-�` -1P-5 •
*RI
vi
i w '-4I Approximate Scale
Z 1 \ 0 50 100 200ft.
a
a I l LEGEND
0
w 1P-3 S B-I Approximate LDcatian of
a ECI Boring, Proj. No.
p E-4563 , Sept. 1989
( IP-I Approximate Location of
's ECl Test Pit, Proj. No.
I l
E-4563 , Sept. 1989
)__2 1P-2 l- N 1P-10I Approximate Location of
ECl Test Pit, Proj. No.
E-4563, Sept. 1989
Proposed Building
( 1
I Existing Building
1P-I
Reference :
Job No. 89246.01
Schematic Grading a Utility Plan
' By Bush, Roed a Hitchings, Inc.
Doted 8/24/89
Boring and Test Pit Location Plan
Eland Distribution Facility
King County; Washington
hacked ND [Date 9/22/89 I Plate 2
MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTION
SYMBOL SYMBOL
.
°o?o•a ,°: a•s (G
u• W Well-Graded Gravels, Gravel-Sand
Gravel vo.°°. o•.°.
And Clean Gravels oe°'o'O _°'o'°'o'° gW Mixtures, Little Or No Fines
Gravelly (little or no fines) "9: :•: :0:
Coarse Soils � , ♦ , � • • — Poorly Graded Gravels,Gravel-
Grained � •�• • gp Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Fines
Soils More Than .i l fj: i,aGM Silty Gravels,Gravel-Sand-
50% Coarse ■I I *?III Gravels With i i I'l I I gm Silt Mixtures
Fraction Fines(appreciable) j
Retained On amount of fines GC Clayey Gravels,Gravel Sand
No. 4 Sieve !'/ // gc Clay Mixtures
0
Sand o;0 e 000°00 o°oa
SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly
And Clean Sand Gee° ; pOo°o SW Sands, Little Or No Fines
Sandy (little or no lines) ,,,!•a:-.`•1•
More Than Soils "••:::' SP Poorly-Graded Sands, Gravelly
50% Material ; ::::•::::: ::,: : Sp Sands, Little Or No Fines
Larger Than ';•-; • :�
More Than
No.200 Sieve Wit 1 SM
50% Coarse Silty Sands, Sand- Silt Mixtures
Size Sands With •i.l.1..l.•I••.1.... Sm
Fraction Fines(appreciable
Passing No.4 amount of fines) ofy SC
Sieve �.��rr,•!! SC Clayey Sands, Sand-Clay Mixtures
ML Inorganic Silts&Very Fine Sands,Rock FloLsrSilty-
fpl Clayey Fine Sands;Clayey Silts w/Slight Plasticity
Fine Silts //l/Grained And Liquid Limit // CL Inorganic Cf w To Mum ,
Soils Clays i I Gravelly Clayslays, Sandy
Lo Clays Medium
Silty CPI Lean
Less Than 50 C Jr
I I !I I I ! I l l ! OL Organic Silts And Organic •
I� I , I , I I OI Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity
More Than MH Inorganic Silts,Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fine
mh Sand Or Silty Soils
50% Material Silts Liquid Limit Smaller Than And • CH Inorganic Clays Of High
No.200 Sieve Clays Greater Than 50 Ch Plasticity, Fat Clays
Size
7/"A OH Organic Clays Of Medium To High
// on Plasticity, Organic Silts
//
A. -:.—.' p• T Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils
Highly Organic Soils
_, pt With High Organic Contents
•r.
Topsoil :•, ••" Humus And Duff Layer
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
Fill ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Highly Variable Constituents
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
The Discussion In The Text Of This Report Is Necessary For A Proper Understanding
Of The Nature Of The Material Presented In The Attached .Logs
Notes:
Dual symbols are used to indicate borderline soil classification. Upper
case letter symbols designate sample classifications based upon lab-
oratory testing; lower case letter symbols designate classifications not
verified by laboratory testing.
7IT 2"O.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER C TORVANE READING, tsf
IL SHELBY RINGUB SAMPLER OR qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf
P SAMPLER PUSHED W MOISTURE, percent of dry weight
. SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED pcf DRY DENSITY,pounds per cubic ft.
2 WATER LEVEL (DATE) LL LIQUID LIMIT,percent
aWATER OBSERVATION WELL PI PLASTIC INDEX
•
Earth LEGEND
consultants Inc.
• .• Geotechnical Engineering and Geology
Proj. No. 4563 Date Sept'89 Plate 3
• •
BORING NO. 1 .
Logged By ND
Date 8-22-89 Elev. 11±*
(N)
Graph �S Soil Description D(fft i" Sample Blows ,A,,
Ft.
:II: F#:I0 Gray silty SAND with gravel, moist,
I ? to
: medium dense _
" iiii
' sm Gray SILT and fine sand, moist, loose _1r •j;':: ';F T 7 28.3
UMW}{r.:r -
{i S:f'{:I::{ 5
Vr/
cl-ml Gray-bluish silty CLAY, moist, -medium stiff -- I 5 45.7
- 10
Li A
't'vi::+ 2
�t :i {• i sm Dark gray-black siltySAND, wet,
} ir.: t g Y-
i• ':•r'••,•• dense --
i� r3: i'l
20 31
3 Pq;;g{.. - 15
y
j: I 3:I: -
--Il 25 29.9
— 20
'}{'{ _ II: 23 33
i;lii
g::13::$f#}•.i 25
f .[:.7r
l 11:1:11;;;;
: : : .-becomes sandy and dense -
: f;: :::r _ = 28 24.7
r••:.. t:r::; - 30
r .r#.
F :j;;( sm Dark gray-black silty SAND and sand - 12 29.7
r :: :EE:: with shells, wet, medium dense •
ff r. :`•i:1 35 •
f# ':1i *Elevation interpolated between contour •
—
rA n*3:1::f lines of Bush, Roed & Hitchings
111;ii. Schematic Grading and Utility Plan, job
rit::3:: #89246.01, dated 8-24-89 -
Tc i c.t.,.r,t,.ti 14 33.7
Boring terminated at 39 feet below existing grade.
Groundwater encountered at 12 feet during drilling.
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative Cl other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of.
information presented on this log.
.47.` /A BORING LOG
(1 1
Earth Consultants Inc.
i1 i\1 / lli u'r5et1uutid luigiik'rrs.Get AogL5ts&linvuo mental M•ulULel!: ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 Drwn. GLS ( Sept'89 Checked ND 1 Date 9-21-89 Plate 4
BORING NO. 2
Logged By ND
Date 8-22-89 Bev. 12±
(N)
Graph CS Soil Description Depth
ft ih Sample Blows (%)
Ft.
:i:E:#:E:E:#:i:} ::: sm Gray-light brown silty SAND with gravel,
4't131, moist, medium dense
11% Gray silty CLAY, moist, stiff = iii 12 31.3
_5
-
cl-ml Gray silty CLAY, moist, soft -
- T 4 58.5
-traces of peat ,_10
_ SZ
I .
.E.:#.�.il;i; sm Dark gray-black silty SAND and sand, - 11 31.4
? :: ; wet, loose
:�4 _:: 15 •
::.:::,�'•
' i::r
E•� .::;;#. - III 7 43.4£': _20
Acl Gray CLAY, wet, firm - stiff -
:)i•}3::f
f::: Dark gray-black silty SAND, wet, 23 31.5
:3:::;E;;:: dense -
Vi01:•;:i:j: --25
ff f
f: rj . j.
:,::.•i,;r...
,1::,I:3:,:E:}::,: -
#...'E: 3:f� sm Dark gray-black silty SAND and sand T
27 25
f::: a•>•rg with shells, wet, medium dense
Boring terminated at 29 feet below existing grade.
Groundwater encountered at 11 feet during drilling.
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering teats,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
BORING LOG
Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
.
\I / 1 i) k*iq) Gmie('dillcall•.jigitivers.Croingisis&f:Il\'IRN11111'Mill SCi1911I\I} KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS J Sept'89 Checked ND I Date 9-21-89 I Plate 5
•
BORING NO. 3 •
Logged By ND
Date 8-22-89 Bev. 15±
(N)
Graph CS Soil Description Dirt Sample Blows loth W)
Ft.
�'�'f:� :'ta:j:Tipp
}i.r
S.T.#
•'��:•I.. sm Gray-light brown silty SAND, moist,
::3:f.3::F:i
1:x?:l:f3:�::; loose - medium dense, with some roots II: 7 14
::�t:11``. /
I I" II _ 5
ml Gray-light brown fine SAND and silt, 5 31.1
moist, loose
— 10
l , .l S .
ml Gray and brown SILT and fine sand, wet, = 8 35.E •
medium stiff :I:
• 15
'I'(••I:1.i•:�•'•J:e.J. -
;�L 1]I+#E•1f 3 sm Dark gray-black silty SAND and sand, 6 31.E
E '1• wet, loose
-
.�. ��dill :(• _ 20
1-cl Gray SILT/CLAY, wet, soft to medium
stiff
sm Dark gray-black silty SAND, wet,
IgiAl
dense
ili25
{#•r..►:iii _ _
-
-
-
c;:i•r�a:
-
27.E
i::: ;re:i!:
- T 29
29 24.2
Boring terminated at 30 feet below existing grade..
Groundwater encountered at 11.5 feet during drilling.
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
•
BORING LOG
i 1r` Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
�l \, I' ".i;), ...,,,,,,...,„1111,1,,IS.0'0101:LS1S&liln•IRIIIhiuiiliiiSii•uuisis KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS I Sept'89 Checked ND I Date 9-21-89 I Plate 6
TEST PIT NO. 1
Logged By ND
Date 8-15-89 • Elev, 15.5t
Depth W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
;I
0 — .. ,,,I sm-ml Gray silty SAND and silt, moist, medium dense
•� II
•
_a:i•±:
`•l•i•'
• I
30.5
:i•i•r I i
5 — :...;.
•
-increasing moisture
20.2
10 =fii
#il
Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations al the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
Logged By ND TEST PIT NO. 2
Date 8-15-89 Elev. 15.5±
0 , , ,
'��1..�.}•i' sm Gray silt SAND
�"� �� y , moist, medium dense
—:rti�>•:ti�i
�t(i•i;ri
i...r 18.4
ml SILT and fine sand with clay, wet, medium dense
35.2
10
:;:i. :i:i sm Gray silty SAND, moist, medium dense
•
Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15
TEST PIT LOGS •
,i Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
I I.1 Grcrterhnirii L'nginerrs,Grrrkrgtsrs&EmtiuHtmrrttal Scientists
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 1 Drwn. GLS Sept'89 Checked ND I Date 9-21791 Plate 7
TEST PIT NO. 3
Logged By ND ?•
Date 8-15-89 Bev. 14±
Depth W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
40 sm Gray silty SAND, moist, medium dense
- .;:1 j:i ::
'}::i :
5 >r:,a:::i:
- , cl-ml Gray silty SAND with clay, moist, medium dense
✓z 29.2
-I I ml Gray silty SAND with fine clay, moist, mediut
-I 'i dense
10 — I 31.3
- Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade. '
• No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
-
15 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole•modified by engineering tests,analysis.and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
inlormat(on presented on this log.
Logged By ND TEST PIT NO. 4
Date 8-15-89 Elev. 14±
0 r•••'-'
t.1 .1:.::
:�: sm Gray-light brown silty SAND, moist, medium dense
:'i' ::t to dense
.:(•l:t:i.'.
•f'1•}..1.:'
r....
5 —:j:i•: ;:i:
_I % ml-cl Dark gray silty SAND with clay, moist, medium 28.4
_ f/ dense
10 —ii/% -increasing clay content 36.9
Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
-
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15
111: TEST PIT LOGS
l , M i� Inc
Earth Consultants In . ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
\ / p Geolerhnic l Engineers.
�� CAYIIOf;I515&Environmental$(ieT1151V KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS I Sept'89 Checked ND • Date 9-21-89 I Plate 8
TEST PIT NO. 5 ,
Logged By ND
Date 8-15-89 Bev. 17i-
, Depth
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
0
sm Gray-light brown silty SAND, dry - moist, medium
dense
-some clay and decomposed organic debris
5 2, cl-ml Dark gray silty SAND, moist to wet, medium dense
cl Dark gray-bluish CLAY with some fine sand/silt,
35.5
moist, soft to medium stiff
10
38.1
Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
•
15
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
Logged By ND
TEST PIT NO. 6
Date 8-15-89 Bev. 11±
0
sm Gray silty SAND, dry - moist, medium dense.
/,c1-rni . Silty CLAY, moist, soft with some red stain
45.8
5 -- and organic debris
cl Bluish CLAY, moist, medium stiff
10 ::4.•
1,1ft sm Black silty SAND, moist, medi 38 6
um dense 27.1
Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
Groundwater seepage encountered at 10 feet during
excavation.
15
TEST PIT LOGS
Inc. • ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
, Consultantstr. yi. ,
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Prcq. No. 4563 Drwn. GLS I Sept'89 Checked ND I Date 9-21-89 ' Plate 9
TEST PIT NO. 7 •
•
Logged By ND
Date 8-15-89 Bev. 13±
Depth W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
sm Gray silty SAND, dry - moist, medium dense
cl Gray CLAY, moist, medium stiff with red/brown
stain and decomposed roots 29.5
5
•
34
10
• •
Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15 Subsurface conditions oepicled represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
Logged By ND TEST PIT NO. 8
Date 8-15-89 Bev. 14.2±
0 :t•:
sm Gray silty SAND, dry, medium dense
:pax:•:a•
•:5:�::rr
cl-ml CLAY with fine silt, wet, soft to medium stiff
. with red stain and small roots 38.4
5 •
39
10 —
Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15
TEST PIT LOGS
i Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
r,10 (iIoi,('hnic1llu)gir11Y•rs.(ilnlllglsts&Environmental Scientists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IProj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS J Sept'89 Checked ND Date 9-21-89 Plate 1'0
TEST PIT NO. 9
Logged By ND
Date 8-15-89 Bev. 12.5±
Depth W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
0
''i*: } sm Gray silty SAND, dry, medium dense
-
cl-ml Gray CLAY with some silt, moist, medium stiff
43.8
5 —
cl Bluish CLAY, wet, soft to medium stiff
36.2
10
Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times end locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
Logged By ND TEST PIT NO. 10
Date 8-15-89 Elev. 11.5±
0 r...
sm Gray silty SAND, dry - moist, medium dense.
cl-ml Gray CLAY/SILT, moist, medium stiff with red
stain
5 —
38.5
-traces of peat at 9'
10 — / 54.3
•
Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15
TEST PIT LOGS
�11rk 'i . I I Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
�J '�� t1►1 (eolechnicalEngineers,Cif[ilogLsis&Envir„enenliiSclnlists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 Drwn, GLS 1 Sept'89 Checked ND Date 9-21-89 Plate 11
TEST PIT NO. 11
Logged By ND
Date 8-15-89 Elev. 16.5±
Depth
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
0 :..
'M sm Light brown silty SAND with gravel, dry ,
dense
18.1
putt
is'•:i�l�
: { sm Gray silty SAND, moist - dry, dense
7tr:.I.
17.5
flUi
sm Gray silty SAND with CLAY and peat, moist - wet,
' P medium stiff
•
24.2
•
10 —Obi
Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade.
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. •
15 Subsurface conditions deoicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
Judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
Logged By ND TEST PIT NO. 12 ,
Date 8-15-89 8ev. 16.5±
0 .,..f•{;;:.
sm Light brown silty SAND with gravel, dry, dense 6.7
-
0,,,
sm-pt Gray dark silty SAND with peat and boulders,
•moist, dense
5 19.5
•
Test pit terminated at 8 feet below existing grade.
10 — No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
•
•
15
TEST PIT LOGS
y;. I Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
Gecnectniad lingi5ers.Geologists wEnvironmental Scenilsis KING COUNTY, WASHINGOTN
Proj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS I Sept'89 Checked ND I Date 9-21-89 I Plate 12
TEST PIT NO.. 101
Logged By SD r•
Date 9-13-89 Elev. 40±
Depth W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
0 , :1 (6" of SOD) •
—"'" SM Tan to brown siltySAND with angular\>;l:i:;:i: g gravel and
rock moist medium dense 14
':f' #::{ White silty SAND, little angular gravel, moist
::::• dense
5 -41 :I:•:l:
�,• •; Sedimentary structure (oxidized) visible in
fiiii
�:�: :j: soil/rock
_:l.r.:;f:i:
-'i.rt;1:{:f. sm thin bands of ochre oxidation (weathered sandstone)
10
:f.,..i_
Test pit terminated at 8 feet below existing grade..
10 — • No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
Logged By SD TEST PIT NO. .102
Date 9-13-89 Elev. 50±
• t0;i:'E (6" of SOD)
_AM
f
�;.l:#:E:} SM Tan to brown silty SAND, some gravel, moist, 14
;.j:l;j:i.; medium dense
- M.; Gray to brown silty SAND, some gravel, partially
i'it 'l' i cemented , medium dense
l'{il`i sm Grayish white silty SAND, moist, dense
-1• ''•1 (weathered sandstone)
- Test pit terminated at 8 feet below existing grade.
10 — No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
15/(
TEST PIT LOGS
1(:&
�JI Earth Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
Il C!►li/ Ckou'('nnicalingin/Y'rsG,'nlnj(Lcis&tinvironnwntatscj,'nILSI.S KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS I Sept'89 Checked SD I Date 9-21-89 I Plate 13
TEST PIT NO. 103
Logged By SD
Date 9-13-89 Elev, 35±
Depth
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
?tiy:i (6" of SOD)
sm Tan to brown silty SAND, some gravel, moist,
medium dense to dense
Brownish white silty SAND, moist, dense
5 ::;;;fit' 14
—:►:j;:�:t SM Grades to white silty SAND, moist, dense
with ochre staining
"''t`t (weathered sandstone)
Test pit terminated at 8 feet below existing grade.
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation.
10 —
•
•
15 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis,and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or Interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
Logged By SD TEST PIT NO. 104
Date 9-13-89 Bev. 25±
„oh, „., Tan to brown siltySAND with,, gravel, moist,
medium dense (topsoil)
Light brown silty SAND, moist, medium dense
� f�:- '• = sm Grades to an orange silty SAND, moist, medium
5 — �' dense to dense, ochre (oxidation) staining
,•r
:;fir t,'i
b.l.}
- ='• = (weathered sandstone)
Test pit terminated at 8 feet below existing grade.
10 —
No groundwater seepage ecnountered during excavation.
15
TEST PIT LOGS
• Earth Consultants Inc.
= 1� ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
i l�/ C••cn,rlvurnl Ed pin<•c rn.C;,tid"Rlctse.FJ,vlrc.,nv1nal Scientists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
•
Proj. No. 4563 Drwn. GLS I Sept'89 Checked SD I Date 9-21-89 ' Plate 14
•
TEST PIT NO. 105
Logged By SD ,
Date 9-13-89 Elev. 20±
Depth W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (%)
Ug (6" topsoil)
- m_ sm__Tart silty SAND, moist, dense
- ;'.M} sm White silty SAND, moist, dense
'''°''-`") 1 ss White SANDSTONE, slightly weathered, very hard
_
5 — Test pit terminated at 3.5 feet below existing grade.
-
No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. ,
10 —
•
15
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests,analysis.and
judgement.They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
information presented on this log.
TEST PIT LOGS
41'1
hslttsI . ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
I Cxuurlmicalhirglnerrs.(icoIo slse.Fswainv ttalScMmht9 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Proj. No. 4563 Drwn. GLS Sept'89 Checked SD I Date 9-21-89 ' Plate 15
APPENDIX B
E-4563
LABORATORY TESTING
General
We conducted laboratory tests on several representative soil samples to verify or modify the
field soil classification of the units encountered and to evaluate the material's general
physical properties and engineering characteristics. A brief description of each of the tests
performed for this study is provided below. The results of laboratory tests performed on
specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual boring
log or on a separate data sheet contained in this Appendix. However, it is important to note
that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. All of
our recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in
guiding our engineering judgement. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of
these data by others.
In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for
this project will be discarded after a period of thirty (30) days following completion of this
report unless we are otherwise directed in writing.
Soil Classification
As mentioned earlier, all soil samples are visually examined in the field by our representative
at the time they are obtained. They are subsequently packaged and returned to our Bellevue
office where they are independently reexamined by one of our engineers and the original
description is verified or modified, as necessary. With the help of information obtained from
classification tests, the samples are described in general accordance with the Unified
Classification System, ASTM Test Method D-2487-83. The resulting descriptions are
provided at the appropriate sample location on the individual boring or test pit log and are
qualitative only. The attached Legend, Plate 3, provides pictorial symbols that match the
written descriptions.
Moisture Content
Moisture content tests were performed on the samples obtain from the borings and test pits.
The purpose of these tests is to approximately ascertain the in-place moisture content of the
soil sample tested. The moisture content is determined in general accordance with ASTM
Test Method D-2216-80. The information obtained assists us by providing qualitative
information regarding soil strength and compressibility. The results of these tests are
presented at the appropriate sample depth on the boring and test pit logs.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
•
Particle Size Analysis
Detailed grain size analyses were conducted on several of the shallow soil samples to
determine the size distribution of the sampled soil. The test is performed in general
accordance with ASTM Test Method D-422-63. The information gained from this analysis
allows us to provide a detailed description and classification of the in-place materials. The
results are presented on Plates 16 and 17, and classification symbols are provided as part of
the appropriate individual sample descriptions on the boring logs.
Atterberg Limits
Because of the large amounts of fines in some of the sampled soils from the field, we
deemed it necessary to perform several Atterberg Limit tests on the finer materials to
determine the soils plasticity characteristics and as an aid in accurate classification of the
soils. These tests include the liquid and plastic limits which were performed in general
accordance with ASTM Test Methods D-423-66(72) and D-424-59(71), respectively. The
Plastic Index, the difference between the liquid and plastic limits, is then determined. The
results of the liquid limit provide a measure of the tested soils shear strength and is
analogous to the direct shear test. When coupled with the plastic index, the results help us
to classify the in-place soils on the basis of these soil characteristics. The result of these
tests are presented on the Plate 18, Atterberg Limits Test Data.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
SIEVE ANALYSIS - — -- HYDROMETER-ANALYSIS--
SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH, U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM
0 W W a M N
N O �t M N :-:-- .--(.z co vi N m 00 N M OV 0 W N0 O O O p 0 O O O O 0 0
����;►.•� 100 �....,.._ -� r• - ��
90 —, \ 10
--N.
S 20
2® m 80 'IC
• m
ir ri! Pt n 70 30 XI ewe Mit —I
• f'4 Z \'..--"% m
O
1 1 60
▪ �to m 0
M m
w frit DJ 50 •0 50
O. o° , - e 73
I.'- -< 73
0 M 40 60 W
A m -<
• ..4 30 70 m
0
8. 20 _ - 80 --I
Z
0 90
10 —
,p t4 .
to r
w Hz 0 1 ILl1 11 I I 1I1141 11 I 1111 1 1 1 ' 1 11LI 100
d GI z Oo O CO CO a C) N OD (D [t r N ." co to' V M N O O O O M O O
— , CD 0 0 0 Q M N ' O O O O O •M N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS O 9 O O O O
v off
z
,� COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE FINES
co C w N COBBLES GRAVEL SAND
H H N
En K C M
r E ki H D rn Boring or DEPTH Moisture
Z KEY USCS DESCRIPTION Content(%) LL PL
co z Test Pit No. (ft.)
.m0 ITJ
Z M Q B-1 22.5 SM Silty SAND 33
-11 H H
m z H n---- TP-1 8 ML SILT with sand 20
H
IC
N 0 .......... TP-11 4.5 ML Sandy SILT 17.5
cs
•-..- TP-12 6 SM Silty SAND 19.5
-
SIEVE-ANALYSIS - -- -- - - --- - - - - 1- --- HYDROMETER-ANALYSIS- - -i
SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES ) NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH,U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM
mo t0 ct m N
N a •- NMID00 N O OO OO O E O O O O
to41 CI N . c N c9 00 t- Ct t0 CO
e-
1
0�r - ,' f
e011 m 0 A m
SO ®� zo
y. n m 70 30 m
ail f� -n so �b ao I
0 pp
xi
r11gri
30 70 m
G)
0 20 80 --I
Z - '
O '90
t9 10
o. r
Lil 7
w Z Ci 0-1— 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 11 1 1 1 1 I I 11 1 1 I 1 I I MI I I 100
0 O 0 O O O O O O 0 00 CD a M N W tD v. M N .'• 00 tD V M N •" OD t0 VMN
CJ D 0 0 0 CO CD a M N .- • 0 0 0• 0• 0• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS �I.,
a oo z
r; z 1-3 COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE FINES
CD H H Cl) COBBLES GRAVEL SAND
k W N
co C m
Fci m 1-3
H Moisture
x D Z Boring or , DEPTH Content (%) LL PL
KEY USCS DESCRIPTION
Test Pit No. (ft.) Moisture
y n co O TP-101 2 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel 14
or
m z K p---— TP-101 8 SM White silty SAND 10
•
❑ TP-102 2 SM Light tan silty SAND 14
a
--- TP-103 5 SM Cream color silty SAND 14
100
T 1•
80
60
>-
Z
1 Q
U
40 �"-'A-Line
CO
a.
20
C L-ML
l
LO
0 20 40 60 80 100
LIQUID LIMIT
Natural
Key Boring/ Depth Soil Classification USCS L.L. P.L. RI. Water
Test Pit (ft) Content
• B-2 17.5 Sandy SILT ML 25 22 3
• TP-2 6.5 SILT ML 27 27 0
• TP-3 6.5 Lean CLAY, silt CL-ML 25 21 4
O TP-4 10 SILT ML 30 29 1
Atterberg Limits Test Data
Earth ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
I! rl I . II, Consultants Inc. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
• Geotechnical Engineering and Geology Proj. No. 45631 Date Sept'89 I Plate 18
• SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCAL-
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
77-7-7-771".-777-7- i1i= iii
lt-
j Oc •,O•. • .,•.••1. o•',.
040 •, ':•'°• '';'•'°•::0.::: •1• H
ili_iii
r• �
. 1 ft. min. o•°,`• . •�v•
°•..
1ft.min. Compacted Subgrade
t
LEGEND
Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material.
Free draining, organic free granular material with a maximum
° :• •••0 size of 3 inches, containing no more than 5 percent fines
)silt and clay size particles passing the No. 200 mesh sieve).
_-- Impermeable visqueen barrier or other impermeable material
approved by geotechnical engineer.
Weephole and drainage pocket as described below.
----0
O Drain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with
perforations or slots facing down; tight jointed; with a
positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic
pipe. Drain line should be bedded on. and surrounded
with free draining 1 inch minus rock or pea gravel, as
desired. The drainrock may be encapsulated with a geo-
technical drainage fabric at the engineers discretion.
NOTES:
• For free standing walls, weepholes may be used. Surround weep-
holes with no less than 18 inches of 1 inch minus rock.
Earth RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND' BACKFILL
Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
Consultlne Enelneert,6�oloQistt KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
(!Environmental Scientists
Proj. No. 4563 1 Drwn. GLS 1 Date Sept'89 Checked SD t Dated 9-21-891 Plate 19
SCHEMATIC ONLY — NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
i s>
l
III-
I
1 I — m I
NOTES:
• Base consists of 3/4 - inch thick, 2 foot by 2 foot plywood with
center drilled 5/8 - inch diameter hole.
• Bedding material, if required, should consist of Traction Sand.
• Marker rod is 1/2- inch diameter steel rod threaded at both ends.
• Marker rod is attached to base by nut and washer on each side
of base.
• Protective sleeve surrounding marker rod should consist of 2 - inch
diameter plastic tubing. Sleeve is not attached to rod or base.
• Additional sections of steel rod can be connected with threaded
couplings.
• Additional sections of plastic sleeve can be connected with
press - fit plastic couplings.
• Steel marker rod should extend at least 6 inches above top of
plastic sleeve.
• Marker should extend at least 2 feet above top of fill surface.
TYPICAL SETTLEMENT MARKER DETAIL
Earth
Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
Consulting Engineers,Geologists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
� (i Environmental Sclena�sts
Proj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS [ Date Sept'89 Checked SD I Dated 9-21-89 1 Plate 20
SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
FLOOR SLAB rr_.
111=11) . ... r.'•'.. r' , •e• ,•• • � .'o III�III
�:. 't ��; :� .r .i:w• ,III
.,. '• III=
I
I
o s'
'o•
o •0
• V
I
. O II
•
• "� II
I
III =III `II� III — III—III= 111=I�1•- 11:1-.,II1'�l`II =I)1= 111=111 I.1I'-II) = 1►1-7111
111= =III=_f11.III e.-_- 111=III; _jll= III=
ills-
--II NATIVE SOIL I I I I_I I
LEGEND
Free draining, organic free, granular material with a maximum
size of 3 inches, containing no more than 5 percent fines
(silt and clay size particles passing the No. 200 mesh sieve]
or other material approved by geotechnical engineer.
Capillary break consisting of not less than 4 inches of free
draining sand or gravel, typically overlain with a visqueen
vapor barrier.
bo Footing drain surrounded with washed rock.
NOTES:
• Structural fill should extend a lateral distance beyond the footing
perimeter equal to or greater than the depth of fill, D : feet.
• Depth of structural fill beneath capillary break and slab, H : feet.
• Structural fill should be placed in thin loose lifts not exceeding 10
inches in thickness. Each lift should be compacted to no less than
the degree specified in the site preparation and earth work section
of this report. No additional lift should be placed until compaction
is achieved.
• Excavated cut slopes should be at a stable angle, and should meet
all local, state and national safety requirements.
• Excavation subgrade should be recompacted before placing any
structural fill. Geotechnical fabric may be required if subgrade is
soft or unstable at geotechnical engineers discretion.
Earth SCHEMATIC STRUCTURAL FILL
sillpConsultants Inc.��• ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
consulting Engineers.Geologists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
U Environmental scientists
I Proj. No. 4563 Drwn. GLS I Date Sept'89 Checked SD I Dated 9-21-89 Plate 21
SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
•
• o
SLOPE TO DRAIN
O
1
O • •O
�i:i po 0
i;r;:
c min
6 inch
o
o .°
5:i� :'t •:i�.i�
0
0O
0
• O
•
'... •• • '• ••.Oo•'••....• 'V•• • I.*• •.�, • O O
'.• •� '. O .o, ..1 O
'..• -„ �..:;. • 18 inch min.
• • . � •0.� •. .,p •• ,,.�,0 �.o•••+a • • O•
•.:•�••,••.o.•'. •r i�..•.:• •.T.••. ••f;•�•.:o• .. o,`• • cC a
O'-'•moo- ••'•`•. •.�o••.•.•�• ••° •o O•
•
•• ••••• ••••;O•. •-••• ••0••O• • • .0'-.� O
4 inch min. :.= - 'a: .•:.' = -.°•:o;• po° ° o •
diameter — •': .••. :e:: I ° ° °• •° :• o °• •o
0
•• ••• •
•
•
••• ••• ... .. .. o O • •_ ti
'
2 inch min.
2 inch min./ 4 inch max. 12 inch
min.
LEGEND
Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability
material.
• • Gravel backfill for walls; WDOT Standard Specifications,
Section 9-03. 12121 , or Fine A•9.; • •• r Aggregate for Portland
• Cement Concrete ; Section 9-03.1 (21.
Q
Drain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with
perforations or slots facing down; tight jointed ; with a
positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic
pipe. Do not tie building downspout drains into footing
lines.
— — — Impermeable visqeen barrier or other impermeable
material approved by Geotechnical Engineer.
Earth TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL
Consultants Inc. ELAND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
Consulting Engineers.Geologists KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
U Environmental Seien •
Proj. No. 4563 I Drwn. GLS I Date Sept 89 Checked SD I Dated 9-21-89I Plate 22
ARC
ogasociated 'X'.ac4ecq Contcactoce
P.O. Box 1794 Woodinville, Washington 98072
(206) 481-3456 or (206) 481-7222
ASSOCIATED ROCKERY CONTRACTORS
STANDARD ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES
1.01 Introduction:
1.01.1 Historical Bac 'around: These standard rockery construction guidelines have been developed in an effort
to provide a more stringent degree of control on rockery materials and construction methodology in the Pacific
Northwest. They have been assembled from numerous other standards presently in use in the area, from expertise
provided by local geotechnical engineers, and from the wide experience of the members of the Association of
Rockery Contractors (ARC).
1.01.2 Goal: The primary goals of this document are to standardize the methods of construction for rockery
rockerys over four feet in height, and to provide a warranty for the materials used in construction and the
workmanship employed in construction. This standard has also been developed in a manner that makes it, to the
best of ARC's knowledge, more stringent than the other standards presently in use by local municipalities.
•
2.01 Materials:
2.01.1 Rock OuaMY: All rock shall be sound, weathering resistant, angular ledge rock. The longest dimension
of any individual rock should not exceed three times its shortest dimension. Acceptability of rock will be
determined by laboratory tests as hereinafter specified, geologic examination and historical'usage records.
All rock delivered to and incorporated in the project shall meet the following minimum specifications:
a. Absorption Not more than 2.0%for igneous and metamorphic rock types.
Not more than 3.0%for sedimentary rock types.
b. Accelerated Expansion (15 days)
(CRD-G148) *1, *2 Not more than 15% breakdown
c. Soundness
(MgSO4 at 5 cycles) Not greater than 5% loss
(CRD-C-137)
d. Unconfined Compressive Strength Intact strength of 15,000 psi, or greater for igneous and
ASTM D 2938-79 (reapproved 1979) metamorphic rocks, and 8000 psi or greater for sedimentaty rock
*1. The test sample will be prepared and tested in accordance with Corps of Engineers Testing procedure CRD-C-
148, "Method of Testing Stone for Expansive Breakdown on Soaking in Ethylene Glycol." Test requirements of not
more than 15 percent breakdown will be computed by dividing the number of individual pieces of initial sample
suffering breakdown (that is, separating into two or more pieces) by the total number of initial pieces in the sample.
*2. Accelerated expansion tests should also include analyses of the fractures and veins found. in the rock. Many
problems associated with rocket),failures are related to the rock fractures and veins found within the rock and not the
rock itself.
4/4/89 Page 1
2.01.2 Freuuenev of Testing: Quarry sources for rockery rock shall begin a testing program when either becoming
a supplier or when a new area of the source pit is opened. The tests described in Section 2.01.3 shall he
performed for every four thousand (4000) tons for the first twelve thousand (12000) tons of material blasted and
removed to establish that specific rock source. The tests shall then be performed once a year or at an apparent
change in material. If problems with a specific area in a pit or with a particular material are encountered, the
initial testing cycle shall he restarted.
2.013 Rock Density: Recognizing that numerous sources of rock exist, and that the nature of rock will vary not
only between sources but also within each source, the density of the rock shall be greater than one hundred fifty-
five (155) pct. Typically, rocks used for rockery construction shall be sized approximately as follows:
Rock Size Rock Weight
Small to large 50-200 pounds
one man
Small to large 200-700 pounds
two man
Small to large 700-2000 pounds
three man
Small to large 2000-4000 pounds
four man
Five Man 4000-6000 pounds
Six Man 6000-8000 pounds
Two and one-man rock, and sometimes smaller, are often used to fill surface gaps along the top of the completed
rockery to create an aesthetically pleasing surface. This is an acceptable practice provided none of the events
described in Section 3.01.5 occur, and that the owner prevents people from climbing or walking on the completed
rockery.
In rockeries over eight feet in height, it should not be possible to move the large sized rocks (four to six-man size)
with a prybar. If these rocks can be moved, the rockery should not be considered capable of restraining any
significant lateral load. However, it is both practical and even desirable that smaller rocks, particularly those used
for "chinking' purposes, can be moved with a prybar to achieve the "best fit".
2.01.4 Submittals: The rock source shall present current geologic and test data for the testing for the minimum
guidelines described in Section 2.01.1 on request by either the rockery contractor, the client, or the applicable
municipality.
3.01 Rockery Construction:
3.01.1 General: Rockery construction is a craft and depends largely on the skill and experience of the builder.
A rockery is a protective system which helps to retard the weathering and erosion process on an exposed cut or
fill soil face. While by its nature (the mass, size and shape of the rocks) it will provide some degree of reten-
tion, it is not a designed or engineered system in the sense a reinforced concrete retaining rockery would be
considered designed or engineered. The degree of retention achieved is dependant on the size of rock used; that
is, the mass or weight, and the height of the rockery being constructed. The larger the rock, the more competent
the rockery. To accomplish this, all rockeries in excess of four feet in height should be built on a "mass" basis.
To provide a competent and adequate rockery structure, all rockeries constructed in front of either cuts or fills
in excess of eight feet in height should be bid and constructed in accordance with these standard guidelines and
the geotechnical engineers supplemental recommendations. Both the standard guidelines and the supplemental
geotechnical recommendations should be provided to prospective bidders before bidding and the start of
construction.
4/4/89 Page 2
The same geotechnical engineer should be retained to monitor rockery construction and to verify, in writing, that
the rockery was constructed in general accordance with this ARC standard and with his supplemental recommenda-
tions, in a professional manner and of competent and suitable materials.
3.01.2 Geotechnical Engineer: The geotechnical engineer retained to provide necessary supplemental rockery
' construction guidelines shall be a practicing geotechnical/civil engineer licensed as a professional civil engineer in
the State of Washington who has at least four years of professional employment as a geotechnical engineer in
responsible charge, including experience with fill construction and stability and rockery construction. The
geotechnical engineer should be hired either by the rockery contractor or the client.
3.013 Responsibility: The ultimate responsibility for rockery construction should remain with the rockery builder.
However, rockeries protecting moderate to thick fills, with steep sloping surfaces above or below them, with
multiple steps, with foundation or other loads affecting them, protecting sandy or gravelly soils subject to ravelling,
with seepage or wet conditions, or that are more than eight feet in height, all represent special conditions and
require consultation and/or advice from qualified experts.
3.01.4 Workmanship: All workmanship is guaranteed by the rockery contractor and all materials are guaranteed
by supplying quarry for a period of six years from the date of completion of erection, providing no modification
or changes to the conditions existing at the time of completion are made.
3.015 Changes to Finished Product: Such changes include, but are not necessarily limited to, excavation of
ditches or trenches within a distance of less than 1.5 times the rockery height measured from the toe of the .
rockery, removal of any material from the subgrade in front of the rockery, excavation and/or removal of material
from any location behind the rockery within a distance at least equal to the rockery's height, the addition of any
surcharge or other loads within a similar distance of the top of the rockery, or surface or subsurface water forced,
directed, or otherwise caused to flow behind the rockery in any quantity.
3.01.6 Slopes: Slopes above rockeries should be kept as flat as possible, but should not exceed 2:1 (Horizon-
tal:Vertical) unless the rockery is designed specifically to provide some restraint to the load imposed by the slope.
Any slope existing above a completed rockery should be provided with a vegetative cover by the owner to help
reduce the potential for surface water flow induced erosion. It should consist of a deep rooted, rapid growth
vegetative mat and typically will be placed by hydroseeding and covered with a mulch. It is often useful to overlay
the seed and mulch with either pegged in-place jute matting, or some other form of approved geotechnical fabric,
to help maintain the seed in-place until the root mat has an opportunity to germinate and take hold.
3.01.7 Monitoring: All rockeries constructed against cuts or fills in excess of eight feet in height shall be
periodically monitored during construction by the geotechnical engineer to verify the nature and quality of the
materials being used are appropriate, that the construction procedures are appropriate, and that the rockery is
being constructed in a generally professional manner and in accordance with this ARC standards and any
supplemental recommendations.
On completion of the rockery, the geotechnical engineer shall submit to the client, the rockery contractor, and to
the appropriate municipality, copies of his rockery examination reports along with a final report summarizing
rockery construction.
3.01.8 Fill Compaction: Where rockeries are constructed in front of a fill, it is imperative that the owner ensure
the fill be placed and compacted in a manner that will provide a competent fill mass. To achieve this goal, all
fills should consist of relatively clean, organic and debris free, granular materials with a maximum size of four
inches. Ideally, but particularly if placement and compaction is to take place during the wet season, they should
contain no more than five percent fines (silt and clay size particles passing the number 200 mesh sieve).
All fills should be placed in thin lifts not exceeding ten inches in loose thickness. Each lift should be compacted
to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Method D-1557-78 (Modified
Proctor), before any additional fill is placed and compacted. In-place density tests should be performed at random
locations within each lift of the fill to verify this degree of compaction is being achieved.
4/4/89 Page 3
3.01.9 Fill Construction and Reinforcement: There are two methods of constructing a fill against which to build
a rockery. The first, which typically applies to rockeries of less than eight feet in height, is to overbuild and then
cut back the fill. The second, which applies to all rockeries in excess of eight feet in height, is to construct the
fill using a geogrid or geotechnical fabric reinforcement.
Overbuilding the fill allows for satisfactory compaction of the fill mass out beyond the location of the fill face to
be protected. Overbuilding also allows the earthwork contractor to use larger and more effective compaction
equipment in his compactive efforts, thereby typically achieving a more competent fill mass. Cutting back into
the well compacted fill also typically results in construction of a competent near vertical fill face against which to
build the rockery.
For the higher rockeries the use of a geogrid or geotechnical fabric to help reinforce the fill results in construction
of a more stable fill face against which to construct the rockery. This form of construction leads to a longer
lasting and more stable rockery and helps reduce the risk of significant long term maintenance.
This latter form of construction requires a design by the geotechnical engineer for each specific case. The vertical
spacing of the reinforcement, the specific type of reinforcement, and the distance to which it must extend back into
the fill, and the amount of lapping must be determined on a rockery-by-rockery basis.
3.01.10 Rockery Keyway: The first step in rockery construction, after general site clearing and/or general
excavation, is to construct a keyway in which to build the rockery. The keyway shall comprise a shallow trench
of between twelve (12) and eighteen (18) inches in depth, extending for the full length of the rockery, and inclined
back slightly towards the face being protected. It is typically dug as wide as the rockery (including the width of
the rock filter layer).
If the condition of the protected face is of concern, the keyway should be constructed in sections of manageable
length, that is of a length that can be constructed in one shift or one days work.
The competency of the keyway subgrade to support the rockery shall be verified by probing with a small diameter
steel rod. The rod shall leave a diameter of between three-eights and one-half inch, and shall be pushed into
the subgrade in a smooth unaided manner under the body weight of the prober only.
Penetration of up to six inches, with some difficulty, shall indicate a "competent" keyway subgrade unless other
factors in the geotechnical engineer's opinion shall indicate otherwise. Penetration in excess of six inches, or of
that depth with ease, shall indicate a "soft" subgrade and one that could require treatment. Soft areas of the
subgrade can be "firmed up" by tamping a layer of coarse quarry spalls into the subgrade.
3.01.11 Kevwvav and Rocker' Drainage: On completion of keyway excavation, a shallow ditch or trench, approxi-
mately twelve (12) inches wide and deep, should be dug along the rear edge of the keyway. A minimum four-
inch diameter perforated or slotted ADS drain pipe, or equivalent approved by an engineer, should be placed in
this shallow trench and should be bedded on and surrounded by a free-draining crushed rock. Burial of the drain
pipe in this shallow trench provides protection to the pipe and helps prevent it from being inadvertently crushed
by pieces of the rockery rock. This drain pipe should be installed with sufficient gradient to initiate flow, and
should be connected to a positive and permanent discharge.
Positive and permanent drainage should be considered to mean an existing, or to be installed, storm drain system,
a swale, ditch or other form of surface water flow collection system, a detention or retention pond, or other
stable native site feature or previously installed collection system.
3.01.12 Rockery Thickness: The individual rockery thickness, including the rock filter layer, should be at least
40 percent of the rockery height. Unless otherwise specified in writing by the rockery "designer" the individual
rocks should be arranged in a single course which, when measured to include the filter layer, is equal to the
required rockery thickness.
4/4/89 Page 4
3.01.13 Rock Selection: The contractor should have sufficient space available so that he can select from among
a number of stockpiled rocks for each space in the rockery to he filled. Rocks which have shapes which do not
match the spaces offered by the previous course of rock should be placed elsewhere to obtain a better fit.
Rock should he of a generally cubical, tabular or semi-rectangular shape. Any rocks of basically rounded or
tetrahedral form should he rejected or used for filling large void spaces.
Smaller rocks (one to two-man size, or smaller) are often used to create an aesthetically pleasing "top edge" to
a rockery. This is acceptable provided none of the events described in Section 3.01.5 occur, and that people are
prevented from climbing or walking on the finished rockery. This is the owner's responsibility.
3.01.14 Rock Placement: The first course of rock should be placed on firm unyielding soil. There should be full
contact between the rock and soil, which may require shaping of the ground surface or slamming or dropping the
rocks into place so that the soil foundation conforms to the rock face bearing on it. As an alternative, it is
satisfactory to place and tamp crushed rock into the subgrade to tighten it up. The bottom of the first course
of rock should be a minimum of twelve (12) inches below the lowest adjacent site grade.
As the rockery is constructed, the rocks should be placed so that there are no continuous joint planes in either
the vertical or lateral direction. Each rock should bear on at least two rocks below it. Rocks should be placed
so that there is some bearing between flat rock faces rather than on joints. Joints between courses should slope
downward towards the material being protected (away from the face of the rockery).
3.01.15 Face Inclination: The face of the rockery should be inclined at a gradient of about 1:6 (Horizontal:-
Vertical) back towards the face being protected. The inclination should not constructed flatter than 1H:4V.
3.01.16 Voids: Because of the nature of the product used to construct a rockery, it is virtually impossible to avoid
creating void spaces between individual rocks. However, it should be recognized that voids do not necessarily
constitute a problem in rockery construction.
Where voids of greater than six inches in dimension exist in the face of a rockery they should be visually examined
to determine if contact between the rocks exists within the thickness of the rockery. If contact does exist, no
further action is required. However, if there is no rock contact within the rockery thickness the void should be
"chinked" with a smaller piece of rock. If a void of greater than six inches exists in the rear face of the rockery,
it should be "chinked" with a smaller rock.
3.01.17 Filter Laver. In order to provide some degree of drainage control behind the rockery, and as a means
of helping to prevent loss of soil through the face of the rockery, a drainage filter shall be installed layer between
the rear face of the rockery and the soil face being protected. This filter layer should be at least twelve (12)
inches thick; and for rockerys in excess of eight feet in height, it should be at least eighteen (18) inches thick.
It should be composed of four inch minus crushed rock, or other material approved by the geotechnical engineer.
If one of the rockery rocks extends back to the exposed soil face, it is not necessary that the filter rock layer
extend between it and the soil face.
In the event seepage is encountered emanating from a protected face, we recommend the use of a well-graded
filter laver. We do not recommend the use of a geotechnical fabric for other than coverage of relatively small and
isolated seepage areas because it has been the industry's experience that the filter fabric tends to clog rapidly.
This quickly leads to a buildup of hydrostatic pressure which can subsequently cause failure and collapse of the
rockery and is to be avoided.
This clogging is apparently due to the virtual impossibility of achieving full contact between the soil face, fabric
and rock filter material. If full surface contact cannot be achieved, there is often a tendency for the soil materials
to flush from the protected face into the 'pockets" in the fabric which leads to the aforementioned clogging.
4/4/89 Page 5
3.01.18 Surface Drainage: It is the owner's responsibility to intercept surface drainage from above the rockery
and direct it away from the rockery to a positive and permanent discharge well below and beyond the toe of the
rockery. Use of other drainage control measures should be determined on a case-by-case basis by the geotechnical
engineer prior to bidding on the project.
ot 414/
•
4.4
ti jk
IW
O �'Cl µ.- \�k.
`isioN At.ON?
4/4/89 Page 6
•,a—t• •. —T—
e
O. •l . .O
• p
° ° 0 0e 0 z O 0
O
0 O• O
O
. a e
{ O
0 0•o 0 0
' •i'���.�: �<�. i':ii. . .err,
• e e O
e 0
7
0 0
0
° e
i •c e o e o o p• Z 2
e 1 e e
0 0
•o
0 0 0_ e
r� e
0
0 0
•
0 e o
I a ' c o e o e oo p ." 'f....;.`'•:': ;.s:::;i'•;::%;;:;:;;:;;r:;:;:::•}`::;:•.; b::%
6 , G Deco .e°•
e 11,
p0o.D p 22
p .o
0o e e a
0
0 0 0 0 0
H
0 0 e
� \ •0 0 0 O.p
O
^ • e 0°O
1
0
Z
° Z
\v'
. •o
o
0
.o
o•
0
°
O O
• •
O
0
O
O
O
•
1
U
O • -0
6
0
e
p
C
e.•o.
0
O
O• z
o p c1
1.
s B " L
(� R
LEGEND
. Crushed rock filter material ranging between 4 and 1 V2 inches in size and free
of organics, with less than 5 percent fines (silt and clay size particles passing
° °° • the No. 200 mesh sieve).
:.r Compacted structural fill consisting of free-draining, organic-free material with a
maximum size of 4 inches. Should contain no more than 5 percent fines
(described above), compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D-1557-78
maximum density.
—_ Tensar SS-1 geogrid, Mirafi, or equivalent reinforcement approved by
geotechnical engineer.
OPerforated or slotted drain pipe with 4 inch minimum diameter bedded on and
surrounded by crushed rock filter material, described above.
® Designates size of rock required, i.e. 4 man.
NOTES
• All fill should be placed in thin lifts not exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness. Each
layer should be compacted to no less than 95 percent of maximium dry density, as
determined by ASTM D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor).
• With exception of upper layer, geofabric reinforcement should be wrapped around
exposed fill face and lapped back beneath overlying fill layer a distance of at least
2 feet.
• Thickness of crushed filter rock layer, B, should be no less than 18 inches.
• Depth of burial of basal layer of rock, D, should be no less than 18 inches.
• Length of reinforcing geofabric, LR, shall be feet.
• Geofabric reinforcement layer spacing Z, and Z2, shall be and feet;
respectively.
• Height of rockery, H, should not exceed feet.
•
TYPICAL DETAIL
FILL CONSTRUCTION
ROCKERY MORE THAN 8 FT. HEIGHT.
Proj. No. Drwn. • I Date Checked J Dated I Plate
4> y
I
A
)
Y
•
r) > > • j>c�F
>
)
Y~ ✓,rk �'v
/ >
A)
0.
'4
)) >Y
�T 7
, > • A)'
7
• 1 ))
)>� J r. ,
+ r } n lr
.> Y
r
)
} > > • )
> 1
)
_
)
> ♦ > , )!,
. T
,
xmc
,. ry
} 3 )
}
• K
Y . Y ,
.Y S ^f"
• )
Y > )r
) > }
)
} )
}
4 >
LR
LO ' I
LEGEND
• � . Crushed rock filter material ranging between 4 and 1'I2 inches in size and free of
• organics, with less than 5 percent fines(silt and clay size particles passing the
No. 200 mesh sieve).
YN Compacted structural fill overbuild.
Compacted structural fill consisting of free-draining,organic-free material with a
maximum size of 4 inches, Should contain no more than 5 percent fines(described
above), compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D-1557-78 maximum density.
OPerforated or slotted drain pipe with 4 inch minimum diameter bedded on and
surrounded by crushed rock filter material, described above.
® Designates size of rock required, i.e.4 man.
NOTES
• All fill should be placed in thin lifts not exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness. Each layer
should be compacted to no less than 95 percent of maximum dry density,as determined by
ASTM D-1557-78(Modified Proctor).
• Thickness of crushed filter rock layer, B,should be no less than 18 inches.
• Depth of burial of basal layer of rock, D, should be no less than 18 inches.
• Height of rockery, H, should not exceed feet.
TYPICAL DETAIL
FILL CONSTRUCTION
ROCKERY 8 FT. AND LESS IN HEIGHT.
Proj. No. Drwn. I Date Checked I Dated $ Plate
• .�+ ,.
Olt .;
•.. JJJ -�
. III '
111D.
67 T .o' •••••4.1;:: IS • •,
.1014 ;•,.. ,.."'V' 4Iiir,. •:!
, • 1n `s7t- �'
li i
—Ill tt _ •<<• I11111 «�� ' .4�1. �� '
IIl1Ti D ! '•,- .° _ • '. T ---,-`J i,—
--1- \ . • -
\�/ ,� i/,.L I� '4 / \4
I Br-
Fig. A. ROCKERY SECTION Fig. B. ROCKERY ELEVATION
SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
NOTES:
Rockery construction is a craft and depends laroely on the The long dimension of the rocks should extend back
skill and experience of the builder. towards the cut or fill fence to provide maximum stability.
A rockery is a protective system which helps retard the Rocks should be placed to avoid continuous joint planes in
weathering and erosion process on an exposed soil face. vertical or lateral directions. Each rock should bear on two
While by its nature (mass, size and shape of the rocks)it or more rocks below it,with good flat-to-flat contact.
will provide some degree of retention, it is not a designed All rockeries over 4 feet in height should be constructed on
or engineered system in the sense a reinforced concrete basis of wall mass, not square footage of face.
retaining wall would be considered designed or engineered.
The degree of retention achieved is dependent on the size Approximate Approximate
of the rock used; that is, the mass or weight, and the height Size Weight-lbs. Diameter
of the wall being constructed.The larger the rock,the more 1 Man 50-200 12-16" .
competent the rockery should be. 2 Man 200-700 18-26"
Rockeries should be considered maintenance items that 3 Man 700-2000 28-36"
will require periodic inspection and repair.They should be 4 Man 2000-4000 •36-48"
located so that they can be reached by a contractor if 5 Man 4000-6000 48-54"
1 repairs become necessary. 6 Man 6000-8000 54-50" ...
Maximum inclination of the slopes above and behind •
Reference: Local quarry weight study using average weights
rockeries should be 2:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). of no less than six rocks of each man size conducted in
Minimum thickness of rock filter layer 6=12 inches. January, 1988.
Minimum embedment D=12 inches undisturbed native soil LEGEND:
or compacted fill placed in accordance with report Drainage materials to consist of clean
recommendations. t''"••••*',.*�i .angular well-graded quarry spalls,with 4-inch
Maximum rockery height H= feet. maximum size, or other material approved by
Rockeries greater than 8 feet in height to be installed the geotechnical engineer.
under periodic or full time observation of the geotechnical :gi.ii::::>»:>:
>.,.:'.,., Surface seal; may consist of impervious soil
engineer.• 'r: :rra:•':�:<s:i{
:.r�:!>.':::':-:.:4;,:,•••.' or a fine tree draining granular material.. •
Unless otherwise specified in writing by the rockery Undisturbed firm Native Soil.
"designer,' all rocks placed in the lower two-thirds of the 11�=tt1=
wall should be 5 to 6 man rock,4000 lbs. or larger. Rocks ,.Of Drain pipe;4-inch minimum diameter,
placed above this level should gradually decrease in perforated or slotted rigid plastic ADS pipe
size with increasing wall height using 3 to 5 man rock, 0 laid with a positive gradient to discharge
700 to 6000 lbs. under control well away from the wall. •
TYPICAL ROCKERY DETAIL
NATIVE CUT, ANY HEIGHT OVER 4 FT.
1
Proj. No. t Drwn. i Date Checked I Date 1 Plate
0
,
e
•
DISTRIBUTION
3 Copies Bruce Blume and Associates
1199 Eastlake, Suite 210
Seattle, Washington 98109
Attention: Mr. Jim Garrison
1 Copy Lance Mueller and Associates
130 Lakeside, Suite F
Seattle, Washington 98122
Attention: Mr. Bob Fadden
Earth Consultants, Inc.
BUSH, ROE_. HITCHINGS, INC.
2009 Minor Avenue East
Seattle,Washington 98102
Area 206/323-4144 rLi JAN 8 1990 ri)
Fax 206/323-7135 •
January 8, 1990
Mr. Jim Garrison
Bruce Blume & Company
146 North Canal Street
Suite 310
Seattle, WA 98103
RE: Flood Plan
Eland Distribution Center Project
Oakesdale Avenue Southwest
Renton, Washington
Dear Jim:
Historically the above mentioned project site may have been within the 100
year flood plain which presently is recognized as elevation 15 feet. Changes
to land features have occurred over the past 10 to 15 years which have altered
lands formerly inundated by the 100 year flood occurrence. Changes that have
occurred which affected this site are:
1. Oakesdale Avenue (formerly Monster Road) and the adjoining railroad
embankment have precluded this land from being flooded.
2. The P-1 pump station located immediately north of this site controls the
flood water of the Green River Valley.
3. Construction of the 13 acre detention storage pond behind the pump
station.
In conclusion I am of the opinion that the Eland Distribution Center site is
not within the present 100 year flood plan. I would like to point out as a
safeguard for this project that the retained 2 acres wetland is available for
both on—site storm water runoff detention and for flood storage. As an added
safeguard co both life and property all proposed new construction will be at
elevation 15 feet or above.
I trust this letter adequately addresses the flooding concerns regarding this
project site.
Respect
obert M. Roe , P.E.
RMR/scr
. , ,';‘0;-;:.',:•-,:);., . . . ,
, ..--- #:•N--,..' •
: .0r,„•••• .
H 04 '90 14:00 LANCE MUELLER 206 328-0554 F'
: 55-
.5:-,•
,..•
. .. .
,5,...
f•'• .
1' •
..,
::.....,
: L...- .-_:.. _,_ , - 0 -:,. ...• : ... , ,
h 1' ' -Ic- Eiii,(:- "._...C-:, 3 - ..7:L.-_,,•,.-_-:._,-..,.:. .' : . •
; . •
...-• . , ,,4,,--7_4'Vt.".1L '':ik'_:"-..."'J7-: ''• -_,_-.,r...L _-'., .: __
•Ii...--
•,,,,,a. 7.)
-4.•;•- 1,5-.11. •,1,c. .,,..=,-, 17r Fi p,i ,, .-.,__ _ ,
. . ,
/
t ...'-'4/e..- SEZ aar--'-'7 0...4.;,.,-•-':A c.• , .,,,...,•.,.."-
IL•Ffr" ''.-: •,'-:•,'.-' .
t....- •'' ---.1. -•-
•,
.'., -M:.) 7:1SV31d '3ACRI 011V..ILM 371';')Vd T1V ;AL3218 j ).,7.s.11----
:,•,., i i-,,0 a e.0' 114 k6 ti.;:li,-, ,,!".:,.'!,, 1,
..,,,, wai4 ;,".'2:,f,',4 . - 0-71-: -*-'.f ---64;*';'ri:-;- '',-,'--.-il ,'-'--',.-477.:1,---7-...-irrlf:._.7i---,_..---,-c' ' ' •
/!...:0j'. ''-*-.4r- ilii4--'•-..,,, LIKQ c`,.':;'-r...': -j,:.6..' Ee?aw e,,!.,-,_»-„1.;‘,;,, ,
. ,_._. •. ,
— —0-rsTr-71;;;_,;;P;i--;.--;k.„;-,-.,ilf, --- ::-,;,•,,,,-K,.1:31m.i,:•.; si, ', , •:. ...:„ ,
,2.
I' ..---:-..,.,,-- - •-„,...-- - ----_---__ '----.---....—___-_. ,
‘.. -
—"-------
. ._
taji 414'?" -a-'1„‘ordw Al Q 7.7-41')% t,•,-- SIZ 'tti;;'*4"..--,'-.. .
; ', . ,
'.: .
-- - -•
(L1,11011I3NI 13 — -:---
1r1S ei3A03) ‘,.;;).., •:,:::-. ERI,.,' ','::. ;r. ,
•,..„,
, .
,4".••,-
LI 0714.f:•-57-.1-). 1------1-,--7,1! --,F.-77-.7-,-7-.---LI-1-----.--,. ::-..„ :,,,--,- .-.,,- :, ,y,,,,.. ..:-,„,„_•__,,,,,:i !
,. ,,'_,,,,....'(,,,„...=:;" ,.._,,,..:-i„ , ,L•9 c„:-,"') t'l ri,;_.-i::_i
. ,..
„- ------- - . -7-- )„. ,,-.------, -T: :------:5-7-----71-w--- ,F,„-1.;;:c;'P---;::::', • •--- , .
_ , :.- .,.:-.- ..,•.-,, ,,..:•:',..;-,.•,.,,,,,, ,,.-.0-zgolt7i7.t V' -,: :,,, •';':i_;,..'u .
i.1 -- ... v 3 .„) ••••-.',,, ,i.i?. ...,:,: Vz" tc.1.14/ -,-.4 5' •!--.. C _ . ,
-.54:: ------ _— • ,,...._______ _____ ____. ______________ ,
- .
...i., .
,c4 ---------'-----------;--77-4 -7:x.2-,.-411:21-17-1- - ''ir-ii''''2..i'----,----f! -I,' •:----- 'C1A ii-,,,,,.,,, ,. ,;• - c'i ..,,,,,,,__„
.:: .
..- ' -- ------,;- i,-.7,,,8 ..:-.-0-0.;•-7.-7„,1 ,..„--1-----A---r,,":6:-A.;,'ir.7,--4,:77-,..-=7:.,=-:r,-.- :
'.•1
ti,.- Ai 410jA, 4/frt . __
r •voi -kily ,,
049,2,"4/0
• . 1
M Mil"
v id
4.. 4, . 1 :31w] 14.M,8111415 NOISSIINSIWeiL rM , ; '. ..., ,-7..: .
,...
i ) ,.. . .
..i .
,;.• , A
.J1W• •
•
"
-• ;!
•
•: • ••:- -.'!‘• 27.11•Or• ff,i
:71 Pr;
,Nnt.mry 4, 19?0
'AUT. FENTM 112-89
EL.SERTZ. i7liEKT.NC DEVERNEiA
',Ali:115.11z 'A" fon.liir.3,t of z. 1:.wo 6tovy office are f 16,500 s.f.
r&v.,use nr aporoxm6tG1y 203,000 Sid Eland
wni fl11i he eiti offie area and
s.r. of the u.nr ,-;o?..IP . The balailce of 4 ,000 s.f , of
cCorprati(7,11 ,. ?r!irla for
i—ta6c..; f' oorrug Iroepe-: proc7.1.1c1-43
Eland Di3',:ritglting 1.7'1.11 urn of 120
0,onsi2tinCi ztEfT, outside
trns-g.
DA1,3ing a vin a propc, JY" ,.,3e area of
sof PL ier,-e2 of t4,7)7-2.,-.n .;', • . u97S s.f.
ft.
'cl,1g the p91-1c:07,T M.7., r2r,r/1 ,EW warehouse
(.;z2A-1260 tlae red parking
r1B" tot1 :-:4 43 c:ar8,
-„Tte reqv,Ird pzi'king Tor bQtb huildirq,s 1(..3 oars, We
p.arl<1.;!g for 1qP, ears parking
-.ran adkliUoi:r.-,1 60 8'117)1)1'1 cquired
•
•
•
•
!•k'
•
€381E-r2 208 3,2C6-421300 •fox:Woe]379-05/54
(14 , /rankle mirehmalistgat:rvitiort eibahfrAmicyj isimon turnery
robert facklen,mdahnoll galbrigehs riallord robert wool*
- 7.2 fuvrAishirli isirdhfbieburbi lobrAbos bv end undoir tthe iftworviaion ractiaberild icrethivicrba
17-..:;CP—P7P gm, N-7-17-4n1,1 -4-*11-11 MM!1-7T 1.71f=.. b171
OF RA,
(: ° )
9TFO S€PSE�'1'0
OF PENDING
SITE. PLAN APPLI
CATION
DESCRIPTION :
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
ECF; SA-112-89
THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO OBTAIN SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A
WAREHOUSE/OFFICE COMPLEX, INCLUDING TWO STRUCTURE, PARKING AND
SERVICE AREAS, LANDSCAPING AND RECREATIONAL AMENITIES. THERE IS
A WETLAND ON THE SITE -- .99 ACRE PORTION IS PROPOSED TO BE
FILLED AND THE REMAINDER WILL BE ENHANCED WITH NATIVE VEGETATION.
THE 16 ACRE PROJECT SITE IS VACANT AND IS ZONED FOR MANUFACTURING
PARK USE.
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS:
601 MONSTER ROAD
PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED :
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
SITE PLAN APPROVAL
BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL
PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED
BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS
AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED
- WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
CERTIFICATION
.
Savela , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT -3 •
COPIES OF •
THE 'ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN .3 . CONSPICUOUS
PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON
/;2-a1- 59
•
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington •
residing in F ki-co , on the O
dayo e( 15k'� ��a? •
SIGNED : 'lczru7 l/ 1
LANCE R ��44C O� TURISE Irma
ASSOCIATES/ARCHI/ARCHI TECTS 4
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122
DATE/ . Sq JOB NO.
(206) 325.2553 :E;?; /,la4
TO a C'/ �/�6p�C� f4j L / •
Trgivagg-
// z-g769fQG�r
WE ARE SENDING YOU X Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications
❑ Copy of letter 0 Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
II ii
/rI 2 x // �� A_,��.7 .-�/ 5/71 -Pa381
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
pi(For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution
XAs requested 0 Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
O For review and comment 0
O FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED A -- LOAN TO US
REMARKS
\lb
\ON
COPY TO
SIGNED: 1%
OF Rk
ZO °)
' DSEP
OF PENDING
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
DESCRIPTION :
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
ECF.; SA-112-89
THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO OBTAIN SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A
WAREHOUSE/OFFICE COMPLEX, INCLUDING TWO STRUCTURE, PARKING AND
SERVICE AREAS, LANDSCAPING AND RECREATIONAL AMENITIES . THERE IS
A WETLAND ON THE SITE -- . 99 ACRE PORTION IS PROPOSED TO BE
FILLED AND THE REMAINDER WILL BE ENHANCED WITH NATIVE VEGETATION.
THE 16 ACRE PROJECT SITE IS VACANT AND IS ZONED FOR MANUFACTURING
PARK USE.
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS:
601 MONSTER ROAD
PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED :
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
SITE PLAN APPROVAL
BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL
PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE . RECEIVED
BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS
AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
r/ . -
NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL
RENTON, WASHINGTON r
A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Current Planning Division
of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the
application and the necessary Public Approvals.
DESCRIPTION: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
ECF; SA-112-89 7
THE APPLICANT SEEKS TO OBTAIN SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A
WAREHOUSE/OFFICE COMPLEX, INCLUDING TWO STRUCTURES, PARKING
AND SERVICE AREAS, LANDSCAPING AND RECREATIONAL AMENITIES.
THERE IS A WETLAND ON THE SITE -- .99 ACRE PORTION IS PROPOSED TO
' BE FILLED AND THE REMAINDER WILL BE ENHANCED WITH NATIVE
VEGETATION. THE 16 ACRE PROJECT SITE IS VACANT AND IS ZONED FOR
MANUFACTURING PARK USE.
GENERAL LOCATION:
601 MONSTER ROAD S.W.
-
2
PUBLIC APPROVALS:,
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
SITE PLAN APPROVAL
BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL
The application can be reviewed in the Current Planning Division located on the third
floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings,
during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further
' information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the
Community Development Department, Current Planning Division at 235-2550.
_/ -- - %- y ®• /
% , / IaMv IulAn•H..TO A<Ha'I. v .
TL(YPU LROUNP MW/Nr SIGN .\
[• MERI �FPOK+TIa-L u�
I -iL
_ �aiaimaaiaaaiiiaaiiaiiaiiaaaiiaaiaiaaiaA„,,..,„NG PL.i,•17,-.1G—
p I I I I I I
i— i
1 , v I n n I., 1, e \.•
II I \'s :fMBE WN6
•
2 c- , ,,......_. \ • v.% 4, , „.. . :\ -0-- , ) ', :\..-4 /
< \ ,,,, .m... ,...,.. e#.4 AS • / / =-T..z-., -2-1 ,
4:4••41:*Ar / \________-, /„...- i /.-
• *: 'A ///
i
/5.I Iv ///:/:
i /
//i re7:/-
-6•<' .m✓ q bopyx5 rsore+..r \ /- •
gl: ua.T era<..c i9G`.++ - V" /9v
/&'i I I IOIRa. ��, �G /.� '
1. w �•
•
r K io � ���
\ T J<.+� .g 9%°` pro g SITE PLA
•
I\\ ,lam •, �`G•eO' I«�.n_x T+w s
. —M'OR IDSL
.. / N4G �f' MAY.AM.,q V
w.<
•4�--• I:
i RvexO.Ga tn...,, �'t rowL 40l .
'WATERFRONT
M,Tt, F�n REPROGRAPHICS / ��+ 903 WESTERN AVENUE
* /� U„ SEATTLE, WA 98104
k., 1 �d �� • (206)467-9889
\ GGRPP'-/ DATE.f
° c)-�V
E.
1
LORDERED 8Y ORDER NO. SHIPPED VIA UE
l_zp41.___j
DESCRIPTION
l2 ,! __
ftewm
c ti° ro I
>v
— — —)EC 1 9 1989
d is rk",p
g' H yY
NO. OF PACKAGES 1 CEIVED
COMPLETE ORDER /tt; PARTIAL ORDER LI I
ORIGINALS ENCLOSED YES n NO X
11
AT % EASSOCIESARCSel LE-Err. _ OF
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 /�%
I 0 N D 6 / JOB NO.
(206) 325-2553
TO C /4,4 :7' �,5 ' g2/ .
RE:
gea4g- ea/frilP/P-re-ot 4 Pi t
)11/ Z—I�
WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop drawings A Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications
O Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
•
•
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:'
O For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
(For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints
O For review and comment 0
I ,
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO. US
REMARKS
/'i
114,
ko .
COPY TO
SIGNED: OZ,
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRioNMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Cuuercnt 1FIcunral
DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 12 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 12/22/89
EFC - 112 - 89
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-112-89
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME & CO.
PROJECT TITLE: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
•
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex including two structures, parking
and sevice areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre protect site
is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
SITE AREA 1 , BUILDING AREA (gross) :
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
o ° o
2 . Air °
3 . Water
o o 0
4 . Plants °
o ° o
5. Animals °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
o ° o
67 . Environmental Health °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
o 0 0
9 . Housing °
10. Aesthetics °
11. Light & Glare °
• , o 0
12 . Recreation °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
° °
14 . Transportation
15. Public Services °
p ° O
16 . Utilities °
COMMENTS:
PLfW i— / �� �� � �,� iv S� "Fay scAcX � `Q8 9,
NN) i 1v ct P1c6 110 PLC i Eva S Z 6 07; AU)
wcf L. ,R&)O aro i-i cavr0u1 PLAWI SHOu �3 r l locaPlato
We hia`ve reviewe this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposal.
Signature o ' rector or. Authorized Representative Date
CDV Rev. 6/88
'b, 1,oIark, O1 5TOiZ11 Alt . SHo0
1/4.CU h(L .D ¶off \ 2, Ki X)
Ps55 w kLi
1-Zoo 106 6 3 0,000 /NSA TS0100
5T u 1' C L P4J Ule
r P-Hz I< I rub N 6. 'kizA.
6t' LN o i0 TIC
Tog-- 9t51-l 4 t1!G s,/ c Aou 1-1-W 19K, Flale-cro Kg,
THE. V30 ,12,9 (4 1-41WCA,1O , PNKT1
for, CL8V ktiON J I w F o�-1 dd�J� � � N-u iao
/NL-'1140u4t1 A o sct9 Pfcf0E, PoR \OJ o
Wel L kry h \ S 0 Gs ,e Mi 5•14,X0 C NJ40 r
N ®1 or 146 Et O kl_Li) OPo I►as Fer-flee i s MOULD
Cotinffv S 11 to&)
it
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-112-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 112-89
PROPONENT: Bruce Blume & Co.
PROJECT TITLE: Blume Distribution Facility
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures; parking
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a . 99 acre2portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project
site is vacant and is zoned. for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/29/89
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION)
SHORT RANGE
4 LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: (jORMOI L + ,Jtj1 X 0 5 60
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
S r�� Nro hf l' L V LNJi iw 5 0— s u e
PROO OE a TIse ki0 LupeLs U.1E Fir 71ott/ O
L fah-'.0 3U li a 0 S rE a Getv8K.t ,j-f P is- .N
ut CO►'y\pto( Up \`n+ 3m-rej Y RPuliv►c tki S mil.
- Rio t3t71-liw ,WoPosSo el, rZ
l� -��r'✓1�� DATE 1-3 r 0
SiIGNATURE F RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
•
P Alb 5 0r-v-.K5i ( it-c-T, 46Y),s �,9j$
ROu ci tv iu OF ,31 Sl Og
L1iw: - PRoollaliocp
Ito vA I 714 !
PCZOotioto)c,
rzi
•
■ _: ,. ' . ' CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-112-89
APPLICATION NO(S): SA-112-89
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME
PROJECT NAME: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a
warehouse/office complex, including two structures,
parking and service areas, landscaping and recreational
amenities. There is a wetland on the site -- .99 acre
portion is proposed to be filled and the remainder will
be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre
project site is vacant and is zoned for manufacturing
park use.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 601 Monster Road
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Community Development Department
Current Planning Division
The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not
required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the
Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code
(see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during
the environmental review process.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the
lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from March 5, 1990. Any interested
party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., March 20, 1990, in order
to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the
DNS.
Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee
c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
Current Planning Division
Community Development Department
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
PUBLICATION DATE: March 5, 1990
DATE OF DECISION: February 28, 1990
SIGNATURES:
enneth E. Nyb , it
Community Devel
--J
Lynn A. Guttnia n, Director
Public\Works Department
l
t
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
MITIGATION MEASURES
PROJECT: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-112-89
APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-112-89
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a
warehouse/office complex, including two structures,
parking and service areas, landscaping and recreational
amenities. There is a wetland on the site -- .99 acre
portion is proposed to be filled and the remainder will
be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre
project site is vacant and is zoned for manufacturing
park use.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 601 Monster Road.
RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a
Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with
the following conditions:
Natural Environment: 1) That the applicant provide a revised wetland
landscaping plan, to include a greater number, size and
diversity of native wetland plants, subject to approval
by the City, by the Department of Ecology and by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,in advance of site plan
review.
Earth: 2) That the applicant provide a statement agreeing to
limit filling operations on the site to a maximum of .99
acres of the wetland and an approved amount of
dryland fill, using fill material approved by the City, as
well as fill methods/monitoring systems approved by the
City and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in advance
of the issuance of site preparation/building permits.
(Note: The wetland fill plan has been approved by the
Department of Ecology).
Traffic: 3) That the applicant directly provide regional traffic
improvements as stipulated by the Transportation
Systems Division or make a voluntary contribution to
the Grady Way TBZ in the amount of $254,345.65
($185.00 per trip).
Note: The applicant will also need to provide an off-
site improvements plan, including streetlighting, curbs,
if sidewalks, gutters and undergrounding of utility lines,
subject to the approval of the Public Works Department.
(See "Note #B below)
Traffic: 4) That the applicant provide a TMP, including
carpooling/vanpooling, preferred parking, pedestrian
linkages to adjacent Oakesdale Avenue, subject to the
approval of METRO and the Transportation Systems
Division.
Traffic: 5) That the applicant provide an ingress/egress plan
(e.g. driveway location, dimensions and design) as
required by "Access Management to Streets and
Highways" or "ITE Transportation and Land
Development Standards" or as recommended by a
licensed transportation engineer in order to ensure safe,
efficient access for large trucks hauling products from
the site to the adjacent heavily-traveled Oakesdale
Avenue.
(Note #1: All traffic mitigation plans [Conditions #3
through #5, inclusive] must be approved and fees (if
established) paid in advance of the issuance of site
• preparation/building permits for the development.)
(Note #2: The development will generate additional
traffic [estimated at 83 trips per day] to the nearby
intersection of Martin Luther King Way and 68th
Street, where level of service "E" already exists.
Because this intersection is under the jurisdiction of
King County, the City will notify County officials.
The applicant may be called upon by the County to
participate in signal warrants at that intersection; the
applicant has been so advised.)
(Note #3: The Washington State Department of
Transportation may call for additional mitigation
measures if more than 10 trips occur on any state ,
highway during p.m. peak hours during construction or
operations).
Storm Water: 6) That the applicant:
a) provide a revised site plan which elevates all
structures a minimum of two (2) feet above the defined
floodplain elevation of nineteen (19) feet; OR, b)
' provide secondary containment for all structures to
minimize leakage of damaged products (e.g. from fire or
flood) to protect the underlying terrain against
contamination, over the life of the project; OR c)
provide a "hold harmless" agreement ensuring that the
municipality will not be responsible for any damage
occurring to the site or developments thereupon
resulting from flooding on the property. Plans and/or
agreements shall be subject to the approval of the Fire
Prevention Bureau and the Public Works Department
(agreements shall also be approved by the City
Attorney), and shall be provided in advance of the
issuance of site preparation/building permits.
Storm Water: 7) That the applicant shall provide a storm water
drainage management plan, in advance of the issuance
of site preparation/building permits, subject to approval
of the Public Works Department, including: a) on-site
detention with 100 year/7 day design (with design
specifications provided in a supplementary soils
engineering report) (*); b) Type II catch basins with
baffled oil/water separators; and c) biofiltration swales
for storm water prior to entrance into the wetlands (fire
lanes adjacent to wetlands will require adequate
biofiltering buffer strips).
(*) There is an approved Soils Engineering Report on
file, but because staff is recommending a 100 year/7
day design system, rather than the customarily required
25 year/2 day design system, owing to site
characteristics -- e.g. elevations, wetlands -- the Report
will need to be modified with respect to design
specifications prior to the issuance of building permits.
Construction/Noise
Light/Glare/Traffic 8) That the applicant provide a construction mitigation
plan including the following components: a) an erosion
control plan; b) a plan for protection of the wetland
area to be retained while the area to be eliminated is
being filled; c) a plan for wheel-washing of all
construction vehicles prior to leaving the site; d) water
down the site periodically to control dust and debris; e)
a plan for restriction of hauling routes and hours of
hauling operations; f) a plan for signage of site and
structures during construction to facilitate emergency
service provision; and g) a $5,000.00 cash bond for
street clean-up.
In addition the City requests:
Recreation: l) That the applicant make a voluntary contribution in
the amount of $5,000.00 to the development of the
Master Trails Plan in the area of the site.
2) That the applicant provide a recorded easement to
establish a connection from the site to the proposed
adjacent Master Trail, for use by project employees,
subject to approval by the Landscape Planner and the
Parks and Recreation Department.
Note #A: Modifications to the site plan (architectural design), the exterior illumination plan, on-site
recreation plan and dryland landscaping plan (increased plantings; thematic integrity) and landscaping
maintenance bond will be required in conjunction with site plan review.
Note #B: Specific plans/specifications for on-site and off-site improvements, in compliance with
Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, Public Works Standards (Storm Water, Traffic, Water Flow and Fire
Flow) and related regulations, will be required at the time of site preparation/building permit
application.
mmdoc
PF/f:I. - . . , .
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: .�� , s 01A
DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 12 , 1989 • COMMENT% bl '"60 ` '� f '
EFC - 112 - 89 LSELSO V LSD
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-112-89) 5(7
PROPONENT BRUCE BLUME & CO. DEC il 4 1989
PROJECT TITLE: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and sevice areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a . 99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project site
is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use. -
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W. • '
SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) :
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
- MINOR MAJOR 'INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
°
2 . Air °
o ° °
3 Water °
° ° °
4 . Plants ) °
o ° °
5. Animals
o °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
o ° °
V . Environmental Health 1 °
° °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
o ° °
9'. Housing ° - °
o ° °
10. Aesthetics ° °
. ° ° 0
11. Light & Glare °
• ° ° °
12 . Recreation ° °
o °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
° ° °
14 . Transportation ° �s
o ° • °
•
15. Public Services ° °
o ° °
16 . Utilities ` ° °
COMMENTS: •
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
: areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposa
�- " . / ,n
Signa ure of Director or Authori !d Representative Date
�� Rev. 6/88
Blume Distribution Facility
SA-112-89
601 Monster Road SW
1. The proposed development is located in the Grady Way Corridor
Transportation Benefit Zone. Therefore there is a transportation
impact assessment fee as follows:
Building A
a) Warehouse space - 269,000 sq. ft.
Trip rate 4.882 trips per 1000 sq. ft.
Cost per trip $ 185.00
269,000 X 4.882/1000 = 1313.26 trips
1313 .26 trips X $ 185, 00/trip = $ 242 . 953 . 10
b) Office space - 18,000 sq. ft.
Trip rate 22.77 trips per 1000 sq. ft.
Cost per trip $ 152.00
18,000 X 22 .77/1000 = 409.93 trips
409.93 trips X $ 152.00/trip = $ 62 , 309.36
$ 242,953. 10 + $ 62,309. 36 =
$ 305,262.46 Total fee for Bldg. A
Building B
Warehouse space - 49, 100 sq. ft.
Trip rate 4.882 trips per 1000 sq. ft.
Cost per trip $ 185.00
49, 100 X 4.882/1000 = 239.71 trips
239.71 trips X $ 185.00/trip = $ 44 ,345. 65
$ 44, 345. 65 Total fee for Bldg. B
Summary for Item 1:
Building A $305,262.46
Building B $ 44,345. 65
Grand Total Bldg. A & B $349, 608. 11
1.,. 2 . , . .
• _
2 . Truck hauling hours restricted during AM and PM peak hours:
a) AM peak hour 7 to 8:30 AN
b) PM peak hour 3: 30 to 6 PM
3 . Bonding for street cleaning required. Recommend $ 5, 000. 00
minimum amount. (Estimated minimum truck trips for fill only
9,900 trips) .
4. Traffic impact study required per transportation systems
guideline. Guidelines are available in the City's Traffic
Engineering office.
5. Curb, gutters and sidewalk plans required. In addition, street
improvement plans on Oakesdale Ave SW for off-site improvement.
6. Provide street lighting plans to City standards for Oakesdale Ave
SW as part of off-site improvements. Street light plans to
extend the length of property frontage to Oakesdale Ave SW.
7. Developer required to initiate undergrounding of the overhead
electrical and communication conductors (power & telephone)
abutting to Oakesdale Ave SW property frontage (also called main
distribution system for power & telephone) .
8. Proper sight distances for all driveways must be confirmed by a
licensed engineer. Must meet AASHTD standards
Driveway width 30 feet passenger vehicle usage
Driveway width 40 feet large truck usage
9. Throat of driveway to be designed for high volume of traffic
entering and exiting. Driveway designed to meet ITE standards.
Detailed driveway drawing required showing throat distances, curb
radius and proposed turning lanes from Oakesdale Ave SW.
Note: Oakesdale Ave SW will be relatively high speed and high
volume when fully developed. This should be considered when
designing driveways.
10. Developer to establish a commuter information center for transit
service, ride match service, and van pools.
r - 1 . ,
+`A
RENTCN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW STET
ECF-112-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 112-89 .
PROPONENT: Bruce Blume & Co.
PROJECT TITLE: Blume Distribution Facility
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project
site is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/29/89
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU D Cransportation Services Division D
2
POLICE DEPARTMENT CL CC lE OVIi_.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION DEC 11 -4 1989
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
yl LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -yt v•\
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
More information needed per attachment.
.
g-r-:-.4 "."::-
*1-.
DATE ' ,�/
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
FF
rkv
Blume Distribution Facility
SA-112-89
601 Monster Road SW
1. The proposed development is located in the Grady Way Corridor
Transportation Benefit Zone. Therefore there is a transportation
impact assessment fee as follows:
Building A
a) Warehouse space - 269,000 sq. ft.
Trip rate 4.882 trips per 1000 sq. ft.
Cost per trip $ 185. 00
269,000 X 4.882/1000 = 1313 .26 trips
1313.26 trips X $ 185.00/trip = $ 242,953 . 10
b) Office space - 18,000 sq. ft.
Trip rate 22 .77 trips per 1000 sq. ft.
Cost per trip $ 152. 00
18, 000 X 22.77/1000 = 409.93 trips
409.93 trips X $ 152.00/trip = $ 62 , 309.36
$ 242,953. 10 + $ 62,309.36 =
$ 305,262 .46 Total fee for Bldg. A
Building B
Warehouse space - 49, 100 sq. ft.
Trip rate 4.882 trips per 1000 sq. ft.
Cost per trip $ 185.00
49, 100 X 4.882/1000 = 239.71 trips
239.71 trips X $ 185.00/trip = $ 44, 345. 65
$ 44,345. 65 Total fee for Bldg. B
Summary for Item 1:
Building A $305,262.46
Building B $ 44,345. 65
Grand Total Bldg. A & B ,$349,608,11
•
, ,
2 . Truck hauling hours restricted during AM and PM peak hours:
a) AM peak hour 7 to 8:30 AM
b) PM peak hour 3 :30 to 6 PM
3 . Bonding for street cleaning required. Recommend $ 5,000. 00
minimum amount. (Estimated minimum truck trips for fill only
9,900 trips) .
4. Traffic impact study required per transportation systems
guideline. Guidelines are available in the City's Traffic
Engineering office.
5. Curb, gutters and sidewalk plans required. In addition, street
improvement plans on Oakesdale Ave SW for off-site improvement.
6. Provide street lighting plans to City standards for Oakesdale Ave
SW as part of off-site improvements. Street light plans to
extend the length of property frontage to Oakesdale Ave SW.
7 . Developer required to initiate undergrounding of the overhead
electrical and communication conductors (power & telephone)
abutting to Oakesdale Ave SW property frontage (also called main
distribution system for power & telephone) .
8. Proper sight distances for all driveways must be confirmed by a
licensed engineer. Must meet AASHTD standards
Driveway width 30 feet passenger vehicle usage
Driveway width 40 feet large truck usage
' 9. Throat of driveway to be designed for high volume of traffic
entering and exiting. Driveway designed to meet ITE standards.
Detailed driveway drawing required showing throat distances, curb
radius and proposed turning lanes from Oakesdale Ave SW.
Note: Oakesdale Ave SW will be relatively high speed and high
volume when fully developed. This should be considered when
designing driveways.
10. Developer to establish a commuter information center for transit
service, ride match service, and van pools.
rt,, .-, ' .
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEM I03%}
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH ..ITrZ 0 Nv
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1:14c,4,,. NOtN31:1a0 I1
p� 1/10 JNINNVId
DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 12 , 1989 COMMET. tUE: 12/22/89
EFC - 112 - 89
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-112-89
' PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME & CO.
PROJECT TITLE: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and sevice areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a . 99 ,acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder. will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre protect site
is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) :
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
2 . Air °
O O O
3 ., Water °
o ° O
4 : Plants ° °
° ° 0
5. Animals .
O ° °
6.. Energy & Natural Resources ° 0
1 . ' Environmental Health •° °
O ° 0
8 . ,Land & Shoreline Use °
o ° °
9,. Housing °
° °
10. Aesthetics \- °
° °
11. Light & Glare °
° °
12 . Recreation 0
o O °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
o O O
14 . Transportation ° • °
15. Public Services ° I ✓ 0
°
O ° O
16. Utilities ° ° °
COMMENTS:
N Q 2Fil- tO NvJt, �l/�Gtit% ?a/L.., mit,Vt,c,C� OLA/ A___
Wk.)
f,, ,, ,' ff
)dp .
•
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
Pp
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposal.
,- , ram - ,Ia _ .
Signature D ct f or or Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/88
RENTuiv COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
.DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-112--89 ,APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 112-89
PROPONENT: Bruce Blume & Co.
PROJECT TITLE: Blume Distribution Facility
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
' and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project
site is vacant 'and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
\ ,
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/29/89
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING\ THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
APPROVED ✓ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
(PitA OAA` V V.0 OL- p ((.Vl 6k,ve 9�
o\My) ,in4,51-za/Q0 atAmq k,' ou
PAA ti) dive
•
DATE 1.12A0
SIGNATURE OF REC 0 OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
rt
0/),tN6�G
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ro� cNN
n c r. ,s. ^r. ���
ENV RO ME 9T4 L CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET . 1909
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: e f
DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 12 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 12/22/89
EFC - 112 - 89
P C TY M®�RENTON EN
(APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-112-89
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME & CO. DE, 2 1989
PROJECT TITLE: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY r ECEN"
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and sevice areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project site
is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) :
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
° ° o
2 . Air
3 . Water 40tg,
4. Plants °
5. Animals
6: Energy & Natural Resources °
67 . Environmental Health
8. Land & Shoreline Use °
9 . Housing °
10. Aesthetics °
11. Light & Glare °
12 . Recreation °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° °
14 . Transportation °
15. Public Services °
16. Utilities °
COMMENTS:
-11 S LOSS 1 k9 eSusrt b S S N4aj a to R e WAIL L/A/r
I
hall ti V — -Ore rre- a c"- 'I µI,.l1N/lc- 7
149 S . AT' A Mir.(iM✓m,.��
Tl�• bt'VQL04,44't.4t IS *Mum" 'flke- I AGi?i'
EM w c,N 11C14144' A.ec .+ eons re Se fir PRv€ caw% ti,r i►�
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposal.
1 -zillitiect
Signatures of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/88
I ., - RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
�
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW II' � To,v� E �sr®
E -112-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 112-89
NTON
CF
®Ec 1 Z /989
PROPONENT Bruce Blume & Co. eCe
PROJECT TITLE: Blume- Distribution Facility
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including* two structures, parking
and service areas, landscaping'and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a . 99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project
site is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/29/89
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
J
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
berLNG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS: .
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD 'BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Lod &
APPROVED APPROVED WITH ,CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
?2o cT' IS IIVe ov6(sTehr7r 40tr 4*e e►JIRti metoe ._ Rye
Cau.i,a
C2 'rot 1130C Ft-tan:mont:0v of ccfi g,ta..1 Fe- acyMa,nsrm k►w coecc. i;lAS
VIAir CoNI P.. Pt Po•�. . �i we
4!, we 1 ALM- CP. £ LA-L- tS dor-
ACtepr e. )4L1 JM i' sire- esi(.&J 1604AJc-o I'vde,lJdAretu 1
tAloIm s7.t Weil.' f'iLA—.
A) ILL
DATE
SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
_� 7
%
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEt-ARTMENT ropRe ram'
/y,
'
/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE 1�'9
49
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: IIQI ,`�.
DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 12, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 12 S'/89
1
EFC - 112 - 89 CG IY OF RENT®IV
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-112-89 D LC E 0 V E I@`
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME & CO. DEC 12 1989j ,
r
PROJECT TITLE: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
BUILDING DIVISION
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to o tain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and sevice areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. 'The 16 acre project site
is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) :
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth -, - °
° ° °
2 . Air °
° ° °
3 . Water °
°
4. Plants °
5. Animals " ° ° 0
° °
6.. Energy & Natural Resources °
° ° °
7. Environmental Health °
0 0 °
8. Land & Shoreline Use °
9 . Housing ! °
° °
10. Aesthetics °
0 °
11. Light & Glare °
°
12 . Recreation -
°
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
° ° 0
14. Transportation °
° ° °
15. Public Services °
° °
16. Utilities -. °
r
COMMENTS: ,
t
,
l
We have reviewed this application with 'particular attention -to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where addi tonal information is needed to properly assess this
proposal.
_ ' -'.� /yam F
Sgnatu oE'Director or Authorized Representative Date
7
;
Rev. 6/88
REN'ruiv COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DLr-Ai TMENT
•
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
EICF-112-89 ) APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 112-89
PROPONENT: Bruce Blume & Co.
PROJECT TITLE: Blume Distribution Facility
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. , The 16 acre project
site is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/29/89
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: BL.•DZ
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
YS CA L'D ial63 Co c7
-// te /d DATE
SIGNATURE OF DIRE T OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
/)
•
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
r �
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET <CI °mo
REVIEWIIVG DEPARTMENT: so A . 04:64,
DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 12 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE /222/89
03
EFC - 112 - 89
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-112-89
•
PROPONENT: ' BRUCE BLUME & CO.
•
PROJECT TITLE: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and sevice areas, landscaping aild recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a . 99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre pto-iect site •
is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
•
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
SITE AREA .. BUILDING AREA (gross) :
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
o O
2 . Air ° ° 0
3 . Water °
4 . Plants °
5. Animals
o °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
o ° °
67 . Environmental. Health °
O
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
O
9 . Housing °
10. Aesthetics °
11. Light & Glare • °
° °
12 . Recreation K ° °
13 . historic & Cultural Preservation ° •• °
°
14 . Transportation °
15. Public Services ° i • °
° 0 °
16. Utilities
R COMMENTS: �G����� "�`�e-�Y��� D • at%' rLe�
ijs `i A d '44-- /^C
L-i/ v/1-s d ,
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and. have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this •
proposal. •
5
•
ignature of Director o Authorized Representative D tee
Rev. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT '
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-112-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 112-89 -
PROPONENT: Btuce Blume & Co.
PROJECT TITLE: Blume 'Di\stribution Facility
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a .99 acre -portion -is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project
site is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/29/89
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
II
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
- BUILDING DIVISION -
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
J
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS-TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON ,
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
•
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
DATE
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-112-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 112-89
-PROPONENT: Bruce Blume & Co.
PROJECT TITLE: Blume Distribution Facility
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a v
wetland on the site -- a .99 acre' portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project
site is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W. -
TO:
I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/29/89
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION,
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT -
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
J
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT DIVISION: Pl/ r
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS . X NOT APPROVED
'' t(', Prelirnire rr fir& flow recruirernenl' for the Proposed development is 8,500 GPM ws
dent mined by 'Kenton fire Dept.. 'the Ex is+in* Ciky (�/a vermain sipteri CAHnor provide to aboVee r uifeP
0
firms Floal. '(he UJaY�✓ Uhlily tnw. De-k (ecommend% that al,l'crnaVc eonsYruedon methods and kl►e inskaal;or,
C;• an Gtutornahc, fire, Sprinkle✓sIskivn be used reduce The, recluircdA -�;�� -��e�t �lcrhav►� .
? fire flow Anal ,s;s musY he, 50,milre4 ')'or rcvietu tv agate 4tioli 4-he, ocislin waven„a,,
and 62., prbpo.caa cuaYerman tmprdvcrnenl's tah roq;dr, k r tadred �iv2 flow alevrra �✓ s.c
dcvaorenr. r suLjecV
•
'i11e 1111arthmaih Improilernenk ps rnk�, cer�
(�la rm 'Rea; Sr'andaids
6 - Qtl'S UiiG#��s fEE ✓D�klope✓ Ejrf'rnsions , �,�
ee, Aiwa TEvEtoprite( ^A9Ptic/re J Slat-fir - CShesr 2 .of 21
AFXZW./Ainuf2---- DATE 12-2841
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
5n6Er I of 2
op
It ' RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Dec lk�'9�M
ENV IRON' ,E TAL CHECKLIST f"EVGEW SHEET - 'e ,878
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: werturtA4.i tAies
DATE CIRCUILATED: DECEMBER 12 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 12/22/89
EFC - 112 - 89
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-112-89
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME & CO.
PROJECT TITLE: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and sevice areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
-' remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre protect site
is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
-LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
SITE AREA BUILDING AREA , (gross) :
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
° ° °
2 . Air ° r °
°
3 . Water 0
°
°
4: Plants 0
°
5. Animals .
°
6 . Energy & Natural Resources °
° ° °
R . Environmental Health 0
8 . Land & Shoreline Use - °
c °
9 . Housing °
° °
10. Aesthetics °
11. Light & Glare °
12 . Recreation ° °
° ° °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° °
. . ° , ,
14 . Transportation , ° -
15. Public Services °
° ° °
16 . Utilities - ° v `°
`
COMMENTS: l &MM Uri pfl rn ) TSVEterfittif APPU C,rirnJ q2eViaAJ SHE61—,
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas,
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this,
proposal .
tau, 6 0u0._- 12-2$- $`I
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative (J Date
Rev. 6/88
FEE+APPLICATION: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVI1 SHEET
an ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
0 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP
OTHER
APPLICANT: ��Ywc•G2,4 DATE: /� -/'/-S'�J
JOB ADDRESS: eo-&t_I- .4%4c.)
NATURE OF WORK: J SG,�+1•t e.- A - 42 0L .
0 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT / -2' ST DATE RECEIVED
Comments Due BY PROPERTY MGMT.
Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing.
Please provide comments to the Comm. Dev. Dept. (C.D.D.) by 5:00 p.m. on above date.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION Git-e,
a
Esj FEES APPLIED ❑ CANNOT APPLY FEES ❑ LEGAL DESCRIPTION
NEED MORE INFORMATION ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE
❑ FRONT FOOTAGE
❑VICINITY MAP
It is the intent of this development fee analysis to
p y put the developer/owner on
notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development
of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction
permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground
utilities, street improvements, etc.)
PROJECT COST LATECOMER
LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER NO PER. FTG. FEE
CITY HELD .�o
PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD
LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER — © -
CITY HELD � ©—
PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD - Q
SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER UNITS SUCC FEE
Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x
Apartment, Condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x
Commercial/Industrial $.04/sq. ft. of property x 0 / 0.216.539. '7 ,
SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER
Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x
Apartment, condo, each multiplex unit $175/ea. unit x
Commercial/Industrial $.04/sq.ft. of property x (5' 02T, 531. 740 7
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DIS' RICT ospital Area) WATER UNITS SAD FEE
DEVELOPMENTS WITH 1500 ,•PM 'IRE FLOWS OR LESS:
Area Charge $0.034 • •r sq.ft. x
Frontage Charge $1;.00 per front ft. x
DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREA R THAN 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS:
Area Charge $0. i48 p:r sq.ft. x
Frontage Chare $18.01 per front ft. x --D—
i
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DI RICT (Honey Crk. Intercptr) - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE
AREA CHARGES:
Residential dwelling unit , apartments
or equivalents; 250 r dwelling unit x
Commercial develop n .
$.05 per sq.ft. of oss site area x
FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGES:
$37.19 per Fron t. n ea. side) x
$74.38 per fr: t. (prpt on both sides of imprv.) x —O-
.
4 G a.PJ tit- . TOTAL: $ ��D?9• .0.
The above quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit
fees or the cost of water meters. c7i�
&-a-e '3
`�-' "". DATE /o.-/`t` g y
11,
Signature of Director or Authorized Represent ive
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT o�r�- ibC.
ENVIRO ENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET' De `` o,v'
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Sewer � I i4ie. is. ,�8.9
DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 12 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 14 F/89
EFC - 112 - 89,S
r
APPLICATION NO(S) : `SA-112-89 -
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME & CO.
PROJECT TITLE: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and sevice areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project site
is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) :
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth ° ° 0
4
° °
2 . Air 4 °
3 . Water _ °
°
4 . Plants °
o ° °
5. Animals
o ° °
6. Energy & Natural Resources
O °
67 . Environmental Health °
O ° I °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° °
° ° °
9 . Housing °
o ° °
10. Aesthetics °
° °
11. Light & Glare
12 . Recreation °
1 ° °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
° ° °
14 . Transportation 0 ° - ° `.�
o ° O
15. Public Services ° °
o ° °
16. Utilities ° ° °
ic
COMMENTS:
1�PTE_ l
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional i formation is needed to properly assess this
prop° NN
d c icy---- • ` � G
4? (
SC ce f Director or Authorized Representative ate
Rev. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-112-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 112-89
PROPONENT: Bruce Blume & Co.
PROJECT TITLE: Blume Distribution Facility
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project
site is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/29/89
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
•
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: tP,r u-i-1 `►�rec
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS )‹- NOT APPROVED
&4157-trAIAJI,16- Lk)L1-0- &) -4z4E_LL-F- cir-y if>r— 24.4-1-b6/
AEvtA.Fiz.g.44-e.a.6cv _
s
—
DATE
SI R OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
A
,
;- .
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . c 'bjyv
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET Den ' Mo 04,
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ftr '�� k"gee
DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 12 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 1f�. 9`
N
EFC - 112 -) 89 i
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-112-89
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME & CO. .
PROJECT TITLE: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY j)i,"
1 i) Io
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and sevice areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a . 99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project site -
is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use. -
, LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) :
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT ' NECESSARY
1. Earth °
0 ° °
c 2 . Air °
O ° 0
3 . Water ' °
4! Plants °
° °
5 Animals ..,
o ° °
6. Energy & Natural Resources
o ° °
47. Environmental Health - °
O ° I 0
8,. Land & Shoreline Use ° J0.
O Z 0 °
9'. Housing '
° °
10. Aesthetics ° ° 0
o ° 0 .
11. Light & Glare °
12 : Recreation °
O 0 °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° °
0 °
14 . Transportation '° °
° ° °
15. Public Services ' °
I °. , ° °
16. Utilities ° j °
\ COMMENTS:
, „7:e./2.4- Z0.9,2_,- ar..e.44-4j ..,-4' Ar-a€61 611470 ' ler4‘
ff s.4t.e.yd .
t -1-4 7 2'1" --4 7 4(46- / la de le-"-
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which' we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposl.
- /6/42044 igAe- /if n if
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/8'8
1
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-112-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 112-89
PROPONENT: Bruce Blume & Co.
I
PROJECT TITLE: Blume Distribution Facility
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project
site is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/29/89
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT '
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY. 5: 00 P.M. ON
II
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS,' NOT APPROVED
Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and BuildingCodes
Ordi-
nances. and
A second means of approved access is required. Fire a a-tment access roads/lanes shall be paved
minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No
Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of D 50 0 is
required. 9 hydrants with a minimum flow of /, ove, gpm each
is required.
-Primary hydrant is required to be 'within feet of the structure.
Secondary hydrants are required to be within 3 d 0 feet of the
structure.
An,approved automatic sprinkler system is'required to protect the total structure. Yes ' o—
All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No All fire hydrants are required to be installed and a proved prior to co truction. Yes No
Aga.
DATE . .t,G„ /3, /9e51
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / .
REV.- 6/88
REQUIRCI) FIRE FLOC! CALCULATIONS
I. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION •
NAME ,?/u Yj /-s i'e, ,ga `e'./ , /-' c i.c e 25/ U.Br.C. CLASS OF BUILD
ADDRESS 4 D/ /®A4571rf /Pcf• - . GCJ FIRE MGMT AREA
2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCL ONE):
I - II IV III V
FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE • DI WOOD FRAME MIXED
(NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW)
3. DETERMINE AREA;
GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A)
ge!tl. A NUMBER OF STORIES:
TOTAL BUILDING AREA: , 4,?-9, A,&d
4. DETERMINE BASIC .FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA CA): ?6 GPM CB)
5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: -(-- __ Z pp0 GPM (C)
IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF al): � HIGH HAZAR.D,,._AQD UP TO 25% OF )
6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C):
CIF 8+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) I v i ("---(,--C) GPM (D)
7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: -- 5- v v-c2 • GPM CE)
CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF CD): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY
AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD).
8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT•:
USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF
THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT:
SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT • EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ.
0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH I v ' ADD. eD-47 %
11 - 30 ' 20% MAX. EAST -1/S' ADD (cD %
•
31 - 60 • • 15% MAX. SOUTH • (.3 c' ' ADD •C). "" %
61 -100 10% MAX. WEST 4c ' ADD 1 .S %
101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT
150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : . %
(TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJSTMENT: -k- -35'QC) GPM (F)
9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: •
CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM (G)
10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: _.-
CIF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM)
CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000GPM, INSERT 12,O30 GPM)
(D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: v , v U GPM (H)
•
a ,�
1I. SIGNED — 2csGr I IATE 6-0..tP' , //-s'. ,✓$''
RCQUIRr6 FIRE FLOP! CALCULATIONS
I
1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION
NAME /3/Uhl/ /___ /s-770/,3Z„7c,•,.J /C/X i 7 ,
" � 1U.8..C. CLASS OF DUILD
ADDRESS / O/ �6.Ys',�4"i2 % / _5"*. C/
. � FIRE MGMT AREA
2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCL ONE):
I - II IV V
FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE • ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED
(NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW)
3. DETERMINE AREA:
GROUND FLOOR AREA; FT2 (A)
'/ . 8 NUMBER OF STORIES:
• ® TOTAL BUILDING AREA: //I, /9) —
4. DETERMINE BASIC .FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA CA): //, ,0-0-0 GPM CB)
5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: 4-•• I) -19-v GPM (C)
IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD,, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B)
6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C):
CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) S v GPM (D).
7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: — 7-1 �c3-v GPM CE)
CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF CD): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY
AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD).
8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT:
USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENt FOR EACH OF
THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT:
SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ.
0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH /3v' ADD 45- %
11 - 30 • 20%. MAX. EAST 9U' ADD /O %
31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH (-,p' ADD / %
61 -100 10% MAX. WEST /SU ' -t-- ADD %
101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT
150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : , (.) %
(TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: 4-- SOU GPM (F)
9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: •
CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: '/() GPM CG)
10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED:
CIF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM)
CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,O30 GPM)
(D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: )/, 0c)6 GPM CH)
11. SIGNED: / IL, % F.- /7
I ATE -Le.„. /3, /2
•
1 .
/ ., , I
_ peg Ivts
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ZivrcN •
lli
De ENVIRONMN ETAL CHECKLIST REVIEWS ET 8 1989
•
•REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:` 1� ,� 'rac ''' )
DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 12 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 12/22/89
EFC - 112 - 89 7
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-112-'89) P '
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME & CO.
PROJECT TITLE: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY ' -
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and sevice areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
' wetland on the site -- a .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre protect site
is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.- /
SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) :.
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
° ° °
2'. Air °
o ° °
- 3 . Water / °
° ° °
4 . Plants °
1 ° ° °
5. Animals' ° °
r °
6: Energy & Natural Resources °
67 . Environmental Health ° °
° ° °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
o ° o
9 . Housing ° ° 0
O 1 ° °
10. Aesthetics °
• ° O °
11.' _ Light & Glare °
12 . Recreation ° ° 0
° ° °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation
° ° °
14 . ' Transportation °
o ° °
15 . _Public Services ° ; °
° ° °
16 . Utilities
COMMENTS :
Jed- 11e-K r pr�gc> inc1 c.cdm pia);n9 i0
i
c
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified area of probable impact or
. areas. where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposal. "
� . ,4 IZ/2o>gi
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative A, ate
Rev. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-112-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 112-89
PROPONENT: Bruce Blume & Co.
PROJECT TITLE: Blume Distribution Facility
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a . 99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project
site is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/29/89
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
xOTHERS: c•io rp4 Lt/ter V 1-1 ('J
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ;/`for irtwel-e ' (Nay
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONNNDITIONS I( NOT APPROVED
onfe, a� �f�on 011'1( 6, e,7�e , Io=yeav-4=4,yh 57+-1)w-43 aka,
(0 year des �y� r�Ce& . �`C Ica h VIM G e G6r'� �( -f-of b y u- "13 S Gs Fi y ,raid
m�-f 110o( / w n� red o� d;;�o,,r NOW: rja�Gl1l y e vc(ereol/cw //t>ws i h +'he
CAS-e_ or a Z y c5`1oirvi ac el eff- k Tft Eros,on/Scd-,✓t•.v-+1/7'41,4l
C h61 No will be ketiviru( , The_ (00- e4' F-(1 0dpbrim mesa b she f, avr�,
�[ Z rod- a cce ss' 'A( Pr re -FF c Sec /k,/i J3 ot '- ,44.60 s§
T1,11-1 —'✓CG G ' P` DATE I Z 2o/ 7
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE /
REV. 6/88
y
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 19, 1989
TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner
FROM: Kim Scattarella, Stormwater Engineering Specialist'
SUBJECT: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY REVIEW COMMENTS
The following items need to be addressed on Environmental Review prior to site plan
approval;
1) Biofiltration needs to included on the the Stormwater Drainage Plan. Their plan shows
three Baffled Oil/Water separators that all discharge into the wetland. The verbal
agreement at the meeting was for them to use biofiltration swales for stormwater prior to
it entering the wetlands. The swales must have a depth of less than 2 inches, and a
velocity of less than 1.5 ft./sec. in a 2 year design storm. Baffled oil/water separators are
not needed, as long as there is a Type II Catch Basin ,with a Frop-T type restrictor to
mitigate any possible spills.
2) A soils report needs to accompany the next submittal to examine the fill characteristics,
and the soils characteristics of the surrounding area.
3) The area of fill for the wetlands on-site must not exceed one acre. The City and the
Corps of Engineers will monitor the area of the fill on this site.
cc:- Dick Anderson
4) 4 AQ_ 0-
LANCE MUELLER
ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECT.. LETT' ?' © F UGMRISMacir4za
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122
DATE t7i ! JOB NO.
(206) 325-2553 ATTENTIQN��/��.r�,'_ _ _ 0c/044x
' I RE: L ����y����
TO li/�/ � ,-/v
C-,a/411a,1101 0fialeapilfi l: S
100 1l/LL �• l�2"�'9
WE ARE SENDING YOU Jam' Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items:
0 Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 4 IRpAcificatigns.
❑ Copy of letter 0 Change order 0
�! 1.I
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION I ; 1)F C 1. 3 1989 (E�
:I
lr� •� tp 1
I li '� Ii _ :ij It' �g-j!
LI L�� .� .. _ CI u L'
071)
• n nr,nn.11,
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: PFNTON
o For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit es fkr ppfl s
For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit ! o es f r ,dist ibu,ioV
requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return r ta p On tg
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO c
SIGNED: ezd ;e
,
r/,
AN S T 0 2 A G G :�Ir G, v i� 4"r lV 71:7
o a••1fr��n ����1g�sa'�N
tSTR1F,JTJ GEtj-rsiz ll y` �3; aN
O�itGcSDr+_� AJE • St� 1. �lorJS-rat RoAD
DEc 13 tZEtJTJt.1 Jr..,µ I tJC7T�iJ i " 989
illECE11VE
Ti-LtS Sl TE !S LOGATD otJ m4E Sov-n-- lDe 0= 49A4.CSD4.1...E.
A.JE, S•t,J, CS• (43 rcji ST.) AADT A c e rr -co c.00 raa coRP,
2AlL.R0A() SPQR FoR 7I-1•E e:00-rAIaJER CARP• F4GILlN �tJG\RGLG,S
tS Si-re FORMirJ(a A Dt hlo OJ t=RGM
j LDt,J .AREAS. TIE RAtL.szoAt) -rgAc.t4 1-4)t,J EL.EEJ, IS IS,Z Aa0
�t't-►-E SITE L. 61r6V, tS 8, S . -rNI StT5 IS wr -rt4E So-rrom
SOO GF- A -2›'0,7 Ac.F D2A I tJp42E SA ,ItJ GotJStSTI1J(.. M a ST i.Y
DF Jo-o EJE t.,PW ' t slz.)4t-1 AriD <o2ASS 111 t'1 A
'PO tZ'T►o J. GoW"Sa S-rt of m A t-)vF-ALTa.)R.t Ordo AtJD 120A-4)bJA`i'4 .
1-61E FOI....0W1 Oft GA1-e-JLATlo1J4 1,..)Iw 4,Nvw THE ,SDI)I1 t IJ AL
R%.)tJoFF ' o'Tat a.rrt►J( '1 "T ke I,JETL.AtJDS i 2 A- DUE To
s TDeVeLoPM7NT FdR JS 100 'EAR 24 1-lovR DtSI60►.�
SToC2M1, -114E 1 r,I=t L-rlaAT I ow RATE I S I SE-D otJ FE t2M CA‘61 L t'N
RAT FOR `T141S -TYPE 4 QtL.
A2 A I1.1AdoS.. 0, n .
S�I,o GtrASSIFIG.ATI I D VI Luc 41LI' LOAM
I L. D{.o L,.ot'o t . ep tRovP % D
tIJFIL72ATtvIJ RA-r 147-1 44;.:KEc, = , 023t4, I�/��r••
RE' J L-TS
Tat ExISTttJ FLot.J co,JTR To 71-IS WEI-LA/JOS
ARGA 'PORI tJe. A 100 '<EA2 STORM IS P2.09 c.-Fs I,JrNA AN
tr1 FItr-T"r "TID tJ OJTFLO1,J OF /2.4 G-FS AJP A MAx IMF M
WA-SR SURFACE AT ELEv. to . 161 . -n4E POST DSV61.c2PED
t t F-L.o 1,J I,J ILL SS 14-.S q c. tJ F I L-r2AT10N of TFt,o t,J
OF 4, 0 3 GCS , 71-* POST-17 EVE.LoPED ct.J7FLo 4J V 1-1-1(ot.4-ER "T'H-AL)
Tt-.‘E FRE - DcJELoPED OUTFLOW DJE. 'To -rt-4E I 2 SoP-FAGF
AREA- GAvSE'D SY 71-4E 14t42t-16 R2 LJA'r&R POST-
DS4 .1.0FED MA,' I JATE(Z R64,0LT OF
t-1O2c IMPEIZJLOVS SJRFA'G.E A1JIP ."T14 - LL-1 acs OF A poR'noa.)
of `114 LJ ET1-AtiJ D y:l ILL se.- AT St.SV, (D. lo'l% orz o.4S'
eg,14S2 714AN TaS PRE -'DEVSLoPSD ,
ai•
" BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC.
; 0 E't CIVIL ENGINEERS& LAND SURVEYORS
SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 323-4144 ,
O' �Fc%STEO' \4' 24 I .O I SAL al - 2 to -- 'l .
`�S/ONAI �'"
9/25/89 Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. page
BRUCE BLUME
WETLANDS STORAGE SUMMARY
3PM
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: IMP1 NAME: UPPER ORIGINAL BASIN
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA • 15.00 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION • 4.00 inches AREA. . : 15.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL • 10.00 min CN • 80.00
TIME OF CONC • 66.53 min IMPERVIOUS AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 0.00 Acres
CN • 98.00
PEAK RATE: 4.64 cfs VOL: 2.56 Ac-ft TIME: 478 min
BASIN ID: IMP2 NAME: LOWER ORIGINAL BASIN
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA • 15.70 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION • 4.00 inches AREA. . : 15.70 Acres
TIME INTERVAL • 10.00 min CN • 95.00
TIME OF CONC • 42.22 min IMPERVIOUS AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 0.00 Acres
CN • 98.00
PEAK RATE: 11.12 cfs VOL: 4.48 Ac-ft TIME: 472 min
BASIN ID: TOTAL NAME: ORIGINAL TOTAL BASIN
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA • 30.70 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION • 4.00 inches AREA. . : 30.70 Acres
TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 80.00
TIME OF CONC • 98.75 min IMPERVIOUS AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 0.00 Acres
CN • 98.00
PEAK RATE: 8.10 cfs VOL: 5-.24 Ac-ft TIME: 486 min
lEGEND
5 i 1 Hyd No. i_ .. r, \„)t -'ra+.' ;a --
I y Hyd No. 3 .,�, , J( 'A'- .< <;,A ',1--
w Hyd No. 3 --- UPPQr of • "0,I (has —
r
UCOI I
1
C II
1pl I
t 4
o I
6) S
X 1
1 f\ y
1 \
111 i ' , 1
I f ti N
/ ! 5
f
I t.
f ; 1
f
If .. .. ... .m.. .. .. .. •....�....m ....... ti
ti
5ti.
3 6 13 15 18 21 24 27
Tine in Hours
Hyd No. : 1
Rate: 8.09 cfs Time: 8.17 hr
Vol : 5.24 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
Hyd No. : 2
Rate: 4.62 cfs Time: 8.00 hr
Vol : 2.56 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
Hyd No. : 3
Rate: 10.98 cfs Time: 7.83 hr
Vol : 4.48 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
• 0
ri' LEGEND •
I
Hyd No, 1_ O,--; a;,A+ To+;,k „,.;—
Hyd No. 4 ._- ,.,;fed .Pos-t - .-'eJ z I.Je
0 *II `
5
4.
7 f
,
q4 , 1
y
II 1
ON t
j ..
, 5
l
ti5,
r
c.
+
r .a • .
r •y
I r+ �
•ram
r �
3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Tine in Hours
Hyd No. : 1
Rate: 8.09 cfs Time: 8.17 hr
Vol : 5.24 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
Hyd No. : 4
Rate: 14.59 cfs Time: 8.00 hr
Vol : 7.04 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
LEGS
rl
Hyd No. i Pry- Deg¢• IoQ¢,d Lek
Hyd No. 4 Post-L�gelo,pQd
'r Hyd No. 11 Pre - Developed O d-f- low .
1 d. rlo, 4 Ho. 12�- Hyd _-- Post'-Dev21 oPe 1a1-d
C
1 ;
(0' 1
0 t � �• ►,I a. I
Al
1 1
1 ti I I I n
1 �J
i n
LAcl !Jo
r •,:,,'
r •"
7•n . „ .nti1•m nu
£3 18 34 30 36 42
Tine in Hours
Hyd No. : 1
Rate: 8.09 cfs Time: 8.17 hr
Vol : 5.24 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
Hyd No. : 4
Rate: 14.59 cfs Time: 8.00 hr
Vol : 7.04 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
Hyd No. : 11
Rate: 3.29 cfs Time: 13.50 hr
Vol : 5.24 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
Hyd No. : 12
Rate: 4.03 cfs Time: 12.67 hr
Vol : 7.04 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
9/25/89 Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. page
BRUCE BLUME
WETLANDS STORAGE SUMMARY
3PM
LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY
MATCH INFLOW ST DI <-PEAK-> STORAGE
DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) id id <-STAGE> id VOL (cf)
PRE DEVELOPED 0.00 8.09 1 1 10.19 11 59788.42
POST DEVELOPED 0.00 14.59 2 2 10.67 12 95731.38
I pp YR, — 2 14g , PE,e.. ).) 'To2-M
PaS-. DEA/>,t,c)PE D
b,Oq ,v1A.)e,
POST_ D J6LOPsD
= 14,5c c oUTF-t,oki = 4,0"; c t/J ,5 = ( Or (0'1
t
01F-FeeeL)6-e IN MAX,
•
J
124 123 122 121 . • 120
49^ 1 — _ 1T�+ I .n_ 81 ;;r :;9., 1 e .1 1 rl . 5. , I� '�� , is
L •iV\ n \ , r . ��3r
45
cii aGa ' 17 S 10 +F C
FRIDAY HAR:OR PORT STANL Y f V 64CYj 'L' d '
'\85 3,�/ V T.YE• 's�`` O .r �g �Ailjj ha Fill ) .S \1
NE.r--- \. 30 s �.1 I. 'L2'cL ) C/ \ _Vi\*.Y 1Or
17� 4 > 5Q4 43 3r. 1 L �1 3 155. -.:---
5 1;3:
\ rr�c s� r `fy
• 48 15 ,b 0' 1•, -: °�• y�`1 Itti, � � �T� a;. f �J( .� 0: s E 2/"1;V 11 . -lr `\C\�RE RETT �?Sf`` �w�s I 'NI\-\"..\:'.' ' 4,\''4..11 '` I ' " •
80 1,416-eS\ IAA. ., /LI( ..(i . •'',.k.:\.iii:Nik.HYVIT"eil • - '. -A '=---..-„,.8' :' ° 74-7 - . - , \ ;PK-I
100 •le-7:1 -.1' -4 .-:-.'31 5.:.---7L-:-.2'414ity er ;. i . -.-'4 '!"".,------;1,80 r-..1' '• % ar,.'-±..-r ) ?.1
_E_ �( 140 )tL $
�,o ( . .ice' IL' .
• 4 '''. hIT.C" ..'( (4,...
14
rt / 40d ,,, is i ~ ,\ L J
2, •I/ jo,,,
4 P-5' A� \ 1 R•
4::::,41ir _ .i,
•
1 .2. : •
1,
5 \....;.:
, ,, / •COMA1:-- -
, ti., NT-A -2 • � 3�) 30 5 h
47 1 ifif d-gienk • ri ---3� 5 r 2
I �•ABE'4rEVar r ,vvir ,r V -
.1 . r
ler :....... •i
, • . t:g.N-1,:,....-('' Nk.4 '2'. - •_.( -------/_.
....,---,‘ -- ' __.,_j.s. ,.....,td.... 1 5!-,,... 45 04 ILL•a. j
10 �., 4, E TR L�• 0 S / t z-,(7,66Pir) ' c r.
4
It.
:I • % C\--.ti ( ':: : 6$' ....if," '''C:\I ''''.. ( I' 22 7'1°7--:----(-: i4-. (1.---
•
$1 I�, sii `1l , 4 55 - e-"7,"I _ 22'\
•
\\;,..'11.-:Fri.......) ss ..,:1,--.' ,( 7, I 780(. .1'.:- '1 ' 404 .
55 1644 8 s • ,..__- a
l ''' :.1. ;).\ .
_ 65 •/ 5 " ` r aa AD �_2 \'� CROSSER
80 . o w i ,r Sr 7 ,
——— —7p i i 1.--i---
40 `) `� 50 , ,:, ; _ r to L 00 .`�
ta� ` ``-C r .P T�. lit'
B EN �%t^:, rrY S. • 1�/
•
•
Figure 30 . 40L1 . ..". lib ep.P .
'B5 80 35 r `� NOAA ATLAS 2,V:
Prepared by U.S.De.
45 50 55 60 85 30 _ National Oceanic an.:ISOPLUVIALS F 100-YR 24-HR PRECIPIT'TION National weathers.:
IN TENTHS OF AN INCH- Prepared for U.S.D:
•
• Soil Conservation St
L
124 123 122 121 120
tr
KING COUNTY, Wk__lINGTON, SURFACE WAT : DESIGN MANUAL -
-._' b. A 3:1 aspect ratio between the trap length and width of the trap Is desirable. Length Is
defined as the average distance from the inlet to the outlet of the trap. This ratio Is
- Included in the computations for Figure 5.4.4C for the surface area at the interface
between the settling zone and sediment storage volume.
c. Determine the bottom and top surface area of the sediment storage volume to be
r provided (see Figure 5.4.4C) while not exceeding 1.5' In depth and 3:1 side slope from
the bottom of the trap. Note the trap bottom should be level.
d. Determine the total trap dimensions by adding an additional 2' of depth above the
surface of the sediment storage volume, while not exceeding 3:1 side slopes, for the
required settling volume. (see Figure 5.4.4C)
. TABLE 5.4.4A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS IN KING COUNTY
, SOIL SOIL
}i EROD- EROD-
• - HYDROLOGIC IBIUTY HYDROLOGIC IBIUTY
SOIL GROUP GROUP* FACTOR,K' SOIL GROUP GROUP*. FACTOR;IC
Alderwood C 0.15 Orcas Peat D 0.00
,i Arents,Alderwood C 0.15 Oridia D 0.49
Arents, Everett B 0.17 Oval! . C 0.17 '
Beausite C 0.15 Pilchuck C 0.10
Bellingham D 0.32 Puget D 0.28
Briscot D 0.32 Puyallup B 0.28
Buckley D 0.32 Ragnar B 0.32
Coastal Beaches Variable 0.05 Renton D 0.43 .
Earlmont Silt Loam D '0.37 Riverwash Variable -
Edgewick C 0.32 Sala! C 0.37
Everett A 0.17 Sammamish . D 0.37
. Indianola A 0.15 Seattle D 0.00
Kitsap C 0.32 Shacar D 0.00
Klaus C 0.17 SI Silt C 0.37
Mixed Alluvial Land Variable 0.10 Snohomish D 0.32
Neliton A 0.10 Sultan C .0.37
Newberg B - 0.32 Tukwila D 0.00
Nooksack C 0.37 Urban Variable -
Norm. Sandy Loam D 0.24 Woodinville D .0.37
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS
A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high Infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted,and consisting
I chiefly of deep;well-to-excessively drained sands or gravels. These soils have a high rate of water
transmission.
B. (Moderately low runoff potential). Solis having moderate Infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted,and
I consisting chiefly of moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of
water transmission.
C. (Moderately high runoff potential). Soils having slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted,and
consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that Impedes downward movement of water,or soils with moderately
fine to fine textures. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission.
D. (High runoff potential). Soils having very slow Infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting .
_ chiefly of Gay soils with a high swelling potential,soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a
hardpan or day layer at or near the surface,and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. These soils
have a very slow rate of water transmission.
1
I • From SCS,TR-55,Second Edition,June 1986, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made from SCS, Soils Interpretation
Record, Form #5, September 1988.
I5.4.4.1-3 2/89
•
•
•
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE .
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE .
0 122° 5' R30' .4 E. R.5 E. SEATTLE(CITY P.o.)Io MI. 2'3p'I 6 MI. TO INTERSTATE 90 OAkF (Joins sheet 5 I
iv
41,,r,.-tif..tii
B(a! Mar, ,----'io i.
. ,.sirly .. . rt., a .. 1 �l 1• .4:0> ,• �`Jti11mil r:4.I 4'Jg , I I t.; - t.h e
•�• •. . �Suosta '•ii. .tl� \ +�, .a I ........ I ,�� :� ,lit- i •�.3 1
ii• c---ruilliti !::.N44,1111 , "`, k.,!.*...-„,„7
.......! ,
, 12 Ilk-. • 7 I: Um.- :'\
III• "' ::::%— r . .
•
�, -'•.- • II
: '•tM ■ :D_ • ..:Y..hiloi:�kitill . ,1 I AV 0 ; , .
EI .
...
• • mil( River a . il
:e....:1 I.8 , .1400;„,..4 Iv") •
• �I1�1 d....-.•.....,ti;iii..i4i4i0iii-o ....4gt6, 1116 al
\LT!1iflI' �,• a M� 1 -•�.A "6
L. MP e ` I�I �-0 �the rirc.' y �,,,
• •• •I �� ���13 tk:::.`'� BM• .� �IEII�*' /E
�1N —. ,.L•---iiiPr ,.: •.
y
,,,,a6,-, -"..\\;%, '''' - . -' • --,:mAlp ....../ . . i
... ‘.1,;•.i - c.,..,
1=r7„....k .. .: • .. • 1,. „,,....... ...,_..<,••„mt-N,,,„•• It„:111,Now,_ 1
N. „,...4,.. , \(,, , . r. ., :_.: 1,... ..
, i: .... Q., Bm • ••, ,••.•••••.:..:. • : . I: , H. , •_ ., •••,..41,p-:•:-.„•:,,,i•.::•••••:••,. :. , .,..,,,
w $„ • 'I• • �1 o.r:-saw/ __/ `tom,.. y
w bit.i,,„„;;;_l_. .\,...,,;,:,,,, :,,f,,s• ♦ re n'k S. fGFAVE
•
it W ., a8(•i'?S::;f •' \, l� a + 21
as ••.'•• . r' :n gi ®I EII I ��•iiV �� 4✓ ♦•�I` \��,P� i
e o 'I. eeo a: � •q ,iat.1. *`• ,r'J Iz a >�'r,: ��o� is'� ` 1',
:,: •ill *-2:.v-.A.ilk, Ned Will li
\,,
CO
, . � �5 'RA,tai
-•
ROAD Ty .,:I � BeC� /, ••• i ii; ,N.,
� •.• ,,y� � '' 1;1{� :
- �� 0:�- Y;;'ti•upf: • 'R��f, L�I � � \ ?' f.III sW�I R\ : , r It;
•,,.�• ;1 •, III ` �,;:� 1
;� �i ; C -r>.•• , .;, • �� .,.t. _ c• , •,• Jl, i ` '�,-r.'�TkF i'i ,{ ,...�5-:1-n ``"- ` •r
r Ell El r/A4
'11
W O = WOOc3..•.J�II <\\\\\11111\.,t , r , •\,,
13 •i:, ---- ;,, +- % •..�- I
1C•,b •1.',-':I~t '•�
QPU '� + 1 I'i • � I I I tt• • •
• is::'i'i'.: "'",OM3�•
t �'�• bay,- • �Ng I' .I '\••{,:',4f'.` I : e Y ItgC I
I O \ -+ '.- Golf :. urse I a = 4-ti --1 l' niii • A\ :Sa
Wo I A' IFS r• ' • ! •• r -•-•
•� '' it% .8::' \\ -moo.• ' ...
P — BM / 1.: I �,,•! I if' t :IG! 1 !.. I
° \�ii!' t;t .''°-- ,-;. ; �s�� I \.
t~il H�G t � I' • • �eig sllllT l •fi• ♦ I ''I''.'; I�";' •: .r.
If
.) � .• 11 J ,Y, ✓ • :�,T` f•••.i 1i p\ N T?'!!R_Q -2°I':•, ' i ,
• �/ �1 I- � .�,+j.'' �., •.,ti�. :. 1�u,p ,'\. s� +u r, , f•�S•;"I '1 \�
O !' ,,10ii
r�. - -••,C`i- I 1• ':.1,'. '. r, , , I� i 1 •`�f, ` q_• - -� _ tll.' 4,�• .st 6 I i \iv : '''.S I Ur l, I . ,;- it 1. : °• I I_ �!•I'1.E,i, j l I t I�!t 't t'-' Sr.. n49• r �I� .:a ;li:;l'., �_
F :� -•( _ I ILangacre$I•mI ; I r.,, i i , ••1,1•,_;; '1• .
O \ ` II -ll 1• •;'Ci .,4,, ,1 a:I 3 i1:i•' II I I 'R�ctF III'- L::' h^.��: I 1 , _Fc '1frrr
!— I- i i i •�� ® • 'yyp•' F;q {�l S' l w' .n r-- ,s�':r'-I,,•\ � ,•�+•. '�I:. ,'�.
�r ti .,I4, f::3'; 1 I,t•., •FFs�
2T30'/ Ti) „frl I !� a ... �- ,�:,.,. !: 4.' It 113 ' • + •'' , -• .z• UU,i:
N ! 1 .I 1I i ter :! ;: r' 5• ' t', rI :1,:.•b:•. f4,-• :!:' • •• I4e� t1 ♦'Q. • itN
,:.; ::!, - .,i,,,, •;;t•';',i-, L. k [._ ;:: •14'.:.:.:. '11•,,V4'.:,.-4 Alp.:- ..._._,. . \_________,_; a, .
•
•l - I , ', • So Tu. i ... �tr?-;'7 ,id• 7 I •'�I.
. / ,.../,,4I1 . ! 6:80' ..1...•' ':n:. 11\ .:i,Vi.. :'.:;'i ri,I c--
%
' 25 } I I ,7
1:1
"fIs. y,Fr - ,' e
II c- "� •PY :;•k. ,,;, • .e.'I.rfl•G �e.N%+'.jl •'•"•.n i: , I
•
, , . ;.'�:i ' • UrJ ==0•`1'S1,... 10ih?rid r''•I. . •' , I I
.'a 'r , ` •yy}• �Ilr yb..r Or'::k ii
ALL
•
I �.\\ lA.. ...._•*,
!,_i:,_ �" •-•• ton! .
\ I ''3iitt�.� , +..��.�' : .�'17 :.' I ■I 1 T
1. �;,
I Iii`� I r CA
;".� WO: ,'�!, � • sT�i'� � k.� w : .•� :M� '� I /" !y: .�"{ P. •'.
1 , ..i: i; • ;41. i • •.II _� e r`�\.5•{': vk i = , AA: :; P
�_I_- _ •� •L./tt td 11. '. a , ::I!•/ ,U1.-1• r• {.4 r• �I I'--•--, 1 • Aml3 f �.•
,
Py - ,r_ .1). .., _ — ;,' 4.3 t• f C},�\•• Rimagia p� — -
I ':. • '•.: FT.... .- 4144‘.9 '.. !: ; %•'';i- ; '''!'41''',41f.1,4,.'`.4t.4n2( i.r.,4:11615'*"...:. A,11.....il•::'V,. ".•
Ng
1/ I 1•..1..r.s.,7-00-m. 1 i ,,,:/r ..?i,.::,r
O II \sue •f,� . II . I • 't''':' r;t:v •} Y•..t.' r' f ' 'i �l . 1 r ! B. �I` I•
Ur.7w� fit,'' I' i' se •� i�! ij P. u
v 351BM��a� • 3' -.:i,''. '• _ :�.. nec•ti .. : �;,R ' 'u• '' 446 '' iji• J-=
II u • % a ° laiii 1 ,::.
•
:1. ' I, ; Ur Ih:i
„ '��/r IP Rel'. ,o•i 1 •+�'t.,i.,''. ' 4i' +i. : r`` VNal:r, .1,' • •'I. :. • .,:'.: 'v<� <i•�X''• •M�t •;`ai• ; Li'j • 1 i. ,�•T`i,•�•• •T
r Q, "i'.+ ��f` e=� �q I . f. 11' :`•.---.��aC'..F't"1`1i.,.,:"'"I c ti:. i: i5° 1 T.23 N •
1>' i • ,aRi' � '(' —F'a . 1• � \+ _..`‘Li/
-a' r+ .1. fir .° I•s • :. .'• 'BN� •.. ',•'• ,
.,
T.22 N-. d I. �__, 4I:e�\ _�—;. R/�i .. .r• } ::HAr¢:
NB I� 1.. ,. NB i ,--.,-;,------
i t.-, 8:(;'. a.. . •I1;.",',a 't' 4 . t,i' ,,
... III ;. ` �r?L�r;M12:r 4,t1.�" • :.i .�, ,' Yr .':`:!; e P
: I r�� • I ' .. 1 • 1. 1' ';rf* i flil i .?`,:r r t'° .' • •;- 'G...i �I • •• ••'"•11•'•
•
Ilar, • 1 hP'
•
•
•: . •• I•'.Q ;,t,..j !' . •• k ASa • \`Pk Ur i� a> . • it d :r. • F ASC -t
b.
7,13,1
.... 1 \ •• 1 ...• . . ftS",,,i- ..1 ... N
L2 Dt 5 Pk Os : ,. J
•7,• I'',I' " 9 • •NBifil • sl' ry .n 4 t iWo - • ABC i'AmC
UrI CI` Re I'' .1� ®Y., OS .1 4.t7. -�• CI? •i1--C_' :- • • •:\�_� (_- .,
:I' • • .411 ,
25' I. Wo \1 IIII {% • .' / . •, •.. -•.e: /d �,41;:i*".7.11111241:'• Ag6 ••_•• AmC • .
�i 5 ( (I I-�?1 18 , • v ('• •I { • AmC r; ••• ••. • ,I'° ••
II Ili' ii';' I II, I,t' j '.1I,E '^ 1'.1:
BUSH, ROED& HITCHINGS, INC.
2009 Minor Avenue East
Seattle,Washington 98102 Q0 ama►r,:g. w ,aggn,�N
e e.4 r+6'St,
Area 206/323-4144 CITY OF R, ,, O N
Fax 206/323-7135 I; ;
DEC 1 3 :1989
December 11, 1989 (�
CS
0
City of Renton Development Department
Planning Division
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Attn: Lenora Blauman
Project Manager
Re: Special Permit for Grading & Filling
Container Corporation
601 Monster Road (112-89)
Dear Ms. Blauman:
As an addendum to the grading permit drawings we are including in this letter
the following information as listed under Items F and G in the City' s
application requirements.
Restoration of top soil
Only in the planting areas shown on the Landscape Plans will top soil material
be placed. The landscaping is scheduled to be completed in November, 1990.
Schedule of Completion & Phasing
1. Estimate of quantities. 97 ,000 cubic yards of structural fill and
surcharge material will be imported and placed on site.
2. Type of material. Structural fill will consist of Class A material free
of debris and organic soils and with less than 5% fines . Surcharge
material will consist of Class B fill soils free of organic soils and
debris.
3. Hours of operation. We propose to operate 24 hours a day, 7 days per
week.
4. Time of completion and phasing.
a. Structural fill and preload completed May, 1990.
b. Regrade surcharge to site completed July, 1990.
c. Building A shell completed November, 1990.
d. Building A utilities, paving areas and landscaping also completed
November, 1990.
e. Building B area grading and surcharge completed July, 1990.
BL) ,ri, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC.
City of Renton
December 11, 1989
Page 2
5. Haul routes for fill material
a. 0akesdale Avenue south to Grady Way , from Grady Way west to
Interurban Avenue to freeway access.
b. 0akesdale Avenue south to Grady Way east to Rainier Avenue to freeway
access.
c. Oakesdale Avenue (Monster Road) north to Renton Avenue then
northwesterly to freeway access.
6. Mitigating Measures
a. Public streets to be kept clean of soils by mechanical sweepers and
watered to keep dust to a minimum.
b. Place an aggregated mat of large sized crushed rock material at
entrances to site. Length of entrance to be a minimum of 50 feet
long.
c. Keep fill material moist to minimize dust.
7. Specifications of material
Structural Fill: Free draining granular material with less than 5% by
weight of fines passing the 200 sieve. Material to be free of organic
matter, debris, wood and hazard waste.
Surcharge Fill: Clean soil free of organics, wood chunks, concrete and
hazard waste.
8. Erosion Control
All required sedimentation/erosion control facilities will be constructed
and in operation prior to land clearing and/or other construction to
insure that sediment laden water does not enter the natural drainage
system. All erosion and sediment facilities will be maintained in a
satisfactory condition until such time that clearing and/or construction
is completed and potential for onsite erosion has passed. Additional
facilities will be provided over and above the minimum requirements as
needed to protect adjacent properties and water quality of the receiving
drainage system.
9. Existing Vegetation
All ground cover and trees outside of clearing area will be protected.
Cleared areas to be flagged in the field. Disturbed areas which have
been stripped of vegetation and filled or graded and where no further
work is anticipated for a period of 30 days or longer will be stabilized
with mulching, grass planting or other approved erosion control treatment
applicable to the time of year and growing season.
10. Drainage Flow Calculations. See enclosed copy of calculations.
If additional information is needed please contact John Lierman and myself.
Submitt by,
Ro ert M. Roe , PE
RMR/cd
4440 CITY OF RENTON
= COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
WIMP
Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division
December 12, 1989
Jim Garrison
Bruce Blume and Co.
146 North Canal Street #310
Seattle, Washington 98103
RE: Blume Distribution Facility/Container Corporation, 601 Monster Road,
S.W., (SA 112-89)
Dear Mr. Garrison:
:Ole Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced
application.
It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for review by the
Technical Advisory Committee on December 29, 1989.
If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact Lenora
Blauman, project manager, at 235-2550.
4)
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE/LB:dm
cc: Bob Fadden
Lance Mueller & Assoc.
130 Lakeside, Suite 250
•
Seattle, WA 98122
Bob Olschewsky
Lance Mueller & Assoc.
130 Lakeside, Suite 250
Seattle, WA 98122
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550
Facsimile (206) 235-2513
60 I-h," .LIKIJI-t. bLUVIE HND LU. I U yd
- ,
-.1- 7 ,;-;`•
^, • ,1 ES'IA'11-f;1)E.V".E.,5..ADJ'FR5
• -.•
•
•• A :L•••.(3
•
• •
• t°;,. •_,?
Hi
• '
• '
,
.• ••kin `;' ; •
••••••ilt7,, .• 1:21C3aSe
1 „
1
.21
• I.E..310 f-.•••r7" •,\:,Asl-riN(;roi.,: 98103 (206)63Z-!SOO FAX
13T.1;41.
t! CITY OF RENTON
aaLL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division
November 2 , 1989
James D. Garrison
Bruce Blume and Company
146 North Canal Street, Suite 310
Seattle, Washington 98103
RE: Container Corporation, Oakesdale Avenue, (SA -89)
Dear Mr. Garrison:
This letter is written in response to your request for an
administrative determination with respect to your proposed
separation of the filling and grading permit from the site
plan review process for the above-referenced application.
This action is being sought by you in order to permit the
storage of fill on the project site, pending approval of the
proposed warehouse/office development.
To begin, the purpose of an administrative determination is
to provide an interpretation in situations in which City
ordinances do not establish clear parameters for permitted
actions. In this instance, however, an administrative
determination is not required, as the regulations for the
granting of a special permit are clearly stated in the
City's Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance (4-2302) .
Specifically, Section 4-2302 (2) of the Mining, Excavation
and Grading Ordinance stipulates that a special permit (also
known as a grade and fill permit) be granted "prior to the
Public Works Department issuing any. . .license (to deposit
material) " on a site. This license is required even for
temporary stockpiling of materials.
Additionally, the City must conduct environmental and land
use review for the proposed permit based upon the proximity
of wetlands to the proposed storage area and the amount of
fill proposed to be stockpiled on the site, as mandated by
State Environmental Policy Act Rules, by the Washington
State Department of Ecology, and our local Environmental
Review Ordinance.
While we would be pleased to make every effort to expedite
the review process for a special permit, the City is
required to adhere to SEPA Rules (WAC, Chapter 197-11) and
regulations established by the Mining, Excavation and
Grading Ordinance requirements for the review process. Based
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550
Facsimile (206) 235-2513
James D. Garrisc
November 2 , 1989.
Page 2
upon these constraints and because the site plan/special
permit (grade and fill) applications for the proposed
development are not yet complete, it is likely that the
review process will take a minimum of three months from the
date of submittal to the date of issuance of the Hearing
Examiner's decision on the application.
If you have any questions, or would like additional
information, please telephone me or Lenora Blauman, project
manager, at 235-2550.
Thank you.
ely, �.
0' jit-Q
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
Attachment
'=BRUCE
BLUME / `
&COMPANY REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS
� +%�
OCT 3 0 1989
October 26, 1989
To: Ms. Lenora Blauman =
From: Jim Garrison
Re: Request for administrative determination
Dear Lenora:
Per our phone conversation yesterday morning, I am
disappointed to hear that separation of the filling and
grading permit cannot be made from the building permit on an
expedited basis. As I indicated, we have located a source of
fill for our project however, must be able to provide access
to our property prior to mid-November. In light of the time
required to process a special permit for the filling or
stockpiling, the only other recourse is to make this request
for an administrative determination to hopefully allow us to
stockpile approximately 60, 000 cubic yards of fill material
on the property. You will recall we have previously
completed our fill approval from the Corp. of Engineers.
I have enclosed a site plan of the property and have
highlighted the area we propose to utilize for the stockpile.
This area is located at what will be the truck yard receiving
area. We are suggesting this area in that it is as far away
from the wetland boundary as possible and any differential
settling that might occur during the stockpile period would
not have any effect upon the settling which might occur under
the new building floor. Certainly, any stockpiling we did
would also provide for silt and runoff protection.
Please review this request and let me know if it is possible
to accommodate the proposal at the earliest convenience.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
aeL.AmPte.;-0.
James D. Garrison
cc: Bruce M. Blume
146 NORTH CANAL STREET, SUITE 310 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98103 (206)632-1800 FAX(206)633-4680
, •
EXHIBIT A
` /(s
•
x; ra I j I
Y ji
Nam-_:—,---•-- - .
LO,.• ..r
att.
tl 4 . 1;1.
I.1) 1°' In. '� .. ..eS�e
l� l II i ' �" IV
r • tit! )// 4;14 , sg I; •bZ\ ••\
•MU 47
- ��....r...r ___ I Et
fkpl 9 t'I
� .. 1 i °a v n • Fl
r.'4' .s.;,t‘\)
La ` \ J •'
s1 -Z. CAS 1 , r — � j I \ I � I'
, ` „,D, m �D ` { � i 1II aaa
\
y ,10 S
\ ,`.' 1. /: L. 77.--. •sour Iv•r ui.•i +:�
` ` _, III 11
Ij {
` �r'. i!
vL`\ 1 , I n p .
..\ \ I
11al!IIl ill!!I rI;,I;IIIIIIIIIII;II{uI \Y .�,
:Jlii ` ,1,111 • I ={tfliili{t{11 ` , \ t 5 /
~ lir ( ' (1!ti ,11 ; �. . +I i,„i (;II,i1,!i.,, ii •1. s.tt , `/`i +; q
! 1 \
i Il 1';I LIli[L ;r.,II I:0'11;41:
i ` %.\
1 l 1 On; t►!
e I
`l'Isii III 1:II1il;11i 'M1jil ` C� \ y
1111i II.1 It.Liiii(, 1 tie{ '' 1 I \ IIA to
O
91111'1;l f lirl1;1('11111111(I1111IiN \\ \\ r•:.11. ' 3.
t�'Iiflii`II`.1'1'i!�1JI�(i'�I'1!!,i11ef{}I11 \. r�. i 1i' =n 1
}'�'ili I'i( {Ti 11 ti'�i}I I li'it jt •\ \`\ •
t,e ir, / '
.}tfhil�! ,.III•}Il I,lli�tttl �1ji1111 \ a; :1, / x a O
iii;i.: ,f(jl l(1!li Il{Q,le l 1;,11{I� �: \`. 11 // O
1({,Iii!(I TO.4 J;111d!i}i !IN • `/ 8`1.n
Ilj;j !.111, ;111�iINII ( il,ilq \ r�a•�
it1,1 ',11iI.1�1,,ill'II 1 f,1 j{,, skti.i / n
}1.1i` 'j : ; !! 1 •
i 1 i-{ t ii i!I 1,1 I Iij '. w ti y�1 -ill a c�`� ""a
•
•
`\ r III
N r
1�0 r
26U Barghausen -- •w• Go.,......co•row.uor Of.runs +-.i.:..1i1'IS1I_ '=�'
Coniulling Engineers Inc. •.o.••.n,u •ouuuun.=orocn..NC LmrvLs
Irr rVwY`L. •+y.' =•,I..N,.w � rYo.,.W o.onW. M.••.IKNIIr
•
'514111,
! Y. <_ CITY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
,Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning blvlslon
October 9, 1989
Bob Olschewsky
Lance Mueller
130 Lakeside '
Suite 250
Seattle, Washington 98122
RE: Container Corporation, 601 Monster Road, (112-89)
Dear Mr. Olschewsky:
I am writing to confirm our discussion of October 6, 1989 concerning information which
you must submit in order to complete the above-referenced application so that we may
begin to review this project. •
1) A revised site plan which provides:
a) a setback of structures which includes space between those buildings and the
wetland which is adequate to protect the wetland areas;
b) a plan for preservation/enhancement of the wetland areas (e.g. wetland
perimeter landscaping, biofiltering swales, islands for species habitat, etc.);
c) on-site active recreation for employees;
d) building design which is aesthetically integrated with the adjacent Container
Corporation development;
e) structural siting which orients office areas toward wetlands to enhance views
for employees (if feasible);
Ir f) signage plan, with signage architecturally integrated with building and site;
g) exterior lighting plan, which is aesthetically integrated with site design;
h) a pedestrian linkage plan providing access to the public right-of-way, on-site
recreation and parking, and the neighboring Container Corporation site.
(Note: Site plans should include full legends so that floor plans can be accurately
read and evaluated).
2) A revised landscaping plan which includes:
a) a tree inventory and tree cutting plan which preserves the maximum feasible
number of significant trees on the site;
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (2061235-255n
•
•
Bob Olschewsky
Lance Mueller
October 10, 1989
Page 2
b) a plan which includes plantings adequate in number, size and diversity within
and at site boundaries (berming may be desirable) , and within and at wetland
boundaries to preserve those areas, as well as to provide an attractive viewscape
which is thematically coordinated with adjacent properties.
3) A revised conceptual storm water management plan, which includes such
devices as downspouts to channel water, oil/water separators and biofiltering
swales to purify the runoff before it enters wetland areas.
(Note: The City will require a landscaping maintenance system, and a bond for
landscaping replacement, as established by City Code. Staff may also recommend
that the applicant agree to employ a certified wetland biologist to periodically
monitor the wetland to assure continuing protection of the integrity of that area.)
4) A request for a grade and fill permit (revised Environmental Checklist) which
specifies the amount of fill necessary (cubic yards), the type of fill to be used,
and the source of the fill. (This information is required so that staff can
ascertain that the site can adequately support the proposed structures in order to
protect safety of persons and property.)
5) A variance application (attached) which describes the request to provide less
than the number of parking spaces required by.Code for the proposed
development.
6) A complete vicinity map (instructions attached).
If you have questions or would like additional information, please telephone me at 235-
2550.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
4.(.( S'.'t.A--1 4) (4- -k-'11"Ar•Y-1
Lenora Blauman .
Project Manager
LB/lb
Attachments
/ •
::•:.:+.!:•:••.`•• .::::is
.. ................ ........ ................. ................................. ..^c:^:................................................. +i.e•err�Rrna,•1:;.::.::.::.: :,' �.:.:�I.ir:i.F.. .:I ,: :.;;: v;...
. :::::::.::::::.:::::::::::::::::::... .. ... COMME ttl"ITY DEVZL.a1'1 NT I E 'ART N ' .....:::•: :•::•:::•::.::.:•:::•:::::•::•I ::. :::: •>:•::.;. ;:•;..::
,: .1171;li iil:llll{:7{I7IFN 1177::11 1111::i11 iiTFFI: •••!•�.''•�''�•'• • •••• n '
1. ,
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related
j to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please
I • print or type, and attach additional sheets if necessary.
I •
APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION &
. FEES .
'NAME: _
Bruce Blume & Company _*REZONE FROM( TO ) $
SPECIAL PERMIT
ADD DRESS: _TEMPORARY PERMIT
,146 North Canal Street, Suite 310 / _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
It SITE PLAN APPROVAL I/.206C
CITY: ZIP: X SPECIAL PERMIT - GRADE&FILL (015 00
Seattle 98103 (NO.CU.YDS: )
• _*VARIANCE
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (FROM SECTION: )
I 632-1800 " _ROUTINE VEGETATION
MANAGEMENT PERMIT
CONTACT PERSON (*JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED)
NAME: • SUBDIVISION: $
Jim Garrison
_SHORT PLAT
ADDRESS: TENTATIVE PLAT
1 146 North Canal Street, Suite 310 _PRELIMINARY PLAT
—FINAL PLAT
CITY: ZIP: _*WAIVER
Seattle 98103 *(JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED)
' I NO.OF LOTS:
TELEPHONE NUMBER: PLAT NAME:
632-1800
' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $
OWNER
_PRELIMINARY
NAME: . • _FINAL
•
Bruce Blume & Company
P.U.D.NAME:
' ADDRESS: '
1146 North Canal Street, Suite 310
I BINDING SITE PLAN: •$
CITY: ZIP: • ' '
Seattle 98103
MOBILE HOME PARKS: • ` $:_:.........^'-=.• -�J
TELEPHONE NUMBER: ', ,, ;:., ' '
632-1800 _TENTATIVE _
1 PRELIMINARY
LOCATION —FINAL
PROPERTY ADDRESS: PARK NAME: " " ' .
West of 601 Monster Road SW NO.OF SPACES:
' EXISTING USE: Vacant 4, tv,y-lomeg • 1 CeA5t, VG e 1.A /JUGL1o .
ZONING: • M-P &ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 19O.00
,
PROPOSED USE: '
: (Warehouse/Office Buildings TOTALFEES: . . $_ —•
—
-mT'ibgt" s�?�' Z• .
. AREA:4 � 'SQ.FT.OF PROPERTY: • �''"_"1 G dP-5 G'.—Q/.S/._ fi
•
1. 15.8 AcresT=688,494 Square Feet O O3 7 8 5
. STAFF USE ONLY- -ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING
I
'; .'DATE RECEIVED:,.'"•``'Id° • APPLICATION RECEIVED &DETERMINED TO BE:•
:;j:':::.
:; :i I 2 1989
D TT•r E ACCEPTED,NOTIFICATION SENT::
C•
II (��) la g _
_INCOMPLETE,NOTIFICATION SENT:
�J BY:
• Master Application Form
Page 2 •
Legal description of property (if more space is required, please attach a separate sheet).
Attached •
•
•
•
•
,i
•
• I,
•
•
•
•
jN
AFFIDAVIT
I, James Garrison • , being duly sworn, declare that I am
(please check one) x the authorized representative to act for the property owner, the owner of the
property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the
information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
yl
it
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN T'O BEFORE ME THIS !
1 1 f-h-PAY OF December 19 89
r o _
NOTARY J • IN AND THE STATE OF
WASHI_ • , " E IDIN Seattle
I•
Robert M. Roed 14°' . *I) . !I
(Name of Notary Public) (Si. ature of Owner(
2009 Minor Avenue East 14. North Canal Street, Suite 310
(Address) (Address)
Seatt.1e ,-WA 98102 • Seattle, WA 98103
(City/State/Zip) (City/State/Zip)
(206) 323-4144 632-1800 • I
(Telephone) • (Telephone)
Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and i,'
;.r"other material required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure."
RtnMastr
Revised 9/89
•
•
L.f GAL. 17 .5C1 1 FT L .N
•
•
Beginning at iron bolt marking the center of Section 24, Township 23 `•'-
North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; .
thence north 0°03 '30" west, 2622 . 11 feet to quarter corner between
Section 13 and 24, in said township and range; •
f.
thence south 89°34' 43" west, 1137.00 feet, more or less, to the
westerly margin of County Road No. 8, (now known as Steel Hill Road) •
And the true point of beginning; •
thence southerly and southwesterly along said westerly margin, •
1740.00 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly boundary of the
Northern Pacific Belt Line right-of-way;
thence northwesterly and northerly along said right-of-way and
along the easterly boundary of land conveyed to Chicago, 'Milwaukee
and St. Paul Railway Company (now,Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and
Pacific Railroad Company) . for its revised wye line, 2475.00 feet, -
more or less, to the south bank of Black River in Section 13, said .
township and range; ; -
thence easterly along south bank, 85.00 feet, more or less, to the
- southwesterly margin' of said County Road No. 8;
thence southeasterly along the southerly margin of said road,
1450.00 feet, more of less, to the true point of beginning;
(BEING•ALL that portion of Government Lots 1, 5 and ,6, Section 24,
and the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said Section
24, and Government Lots 5 and 6, in Section 13 and of the bed of
lake shown on Government plat, all in Township 23 North, Range 4
East, W.M. , in King bounty, Washington, lying between County Road
No. 8 and the right-of-way of Northern Pacific Railway Company and .
Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul RailwWCoipany); :.
EXCEPT portion thereof, if any, within the bed and shores of the
Black River as they 6re situated when said river ceased to be a == = :
navigable stream;
EXCEPT that portion of the. northwest quarter of Section 24, Township
23 North, Range 4 East, W.t. . , in King County, Washington, described.as follows:
Commencing at a point on the north line of said Section 24, which is ,' •: -
south 87°29' 26" east,,' 1156.7'7 feet from the northwest corner thereof; ' ' -
thence south 2°30' 34" west, 916.42 feet to the point of beginning;
thence south 53°42' Op" east, 445 feet, more or less, to the westerly
margin of Monster Road; '
thence along said westerly margin south 18°34' 04" west', 31.37 feet '
to a point on a curve from which the radial center bears north
71°25' 56" west, 256.48 feet; PLA,h�f�etir vs
thence southwesterly! along the arc of said curve concave to td�i o�R��otu
northwest, 128.92 feet;
SEP 2 9 1989 •
-
•
•
•
thence south 47°22'04" west, 121.88 feet to a point on a curve from
which the radial center bears south 42°37'56" east, 250.37 feet;
thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve concave to the
southeast, 91.01 feet;
thence leaving said margin north 48°15'O1" west, 420.00 feet;
thence north 8°59' 17" east, 125.00 feet;
thence north 46°14' 18" east, 219. 70 feet to the point of beginning;
ALSO EXCEPT a tract of land 'in the southwest quarter of Section 13,
Township 23 North, Range 4 East,. W.M. , in King County, Washington,
described as follows: '
Commencing at the southwest corner of said Section 13;
thence 'north 29°51' west, 114.71feet;
thence north 66°21' east, 153.9 feet; '
thence south 66°57' east, to a point on the easterly margin of the '
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company
right-of-way and the true point of beginning;
thence northeasterly along said easterly margin of the Chicago,
Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company right-of-way,
108 feet, more or less, to a point on the southerly margin of
Tract 33, Renton Shorelands 2nd Supplement, records of King County,
Washington; .
thence easterly along said southerly margin of Tract 33, 33 feet, .
more or less, to the westerly margin of -County Road No. 8 (known as '.
Monster Road);
thence southeasterly along said westerly margin of County Road •
No. 8, 104 feet, more or less, to a point which bears north ..
74°13' 19" east, from a point within said tract of land Which is
located on the southerly margin of a permanent easement recorded: -
under King County RecordAng Number 7202010402 and'granted to King.
County for the P-1 Drainage Channel, said point being described by .= '-
Washington State Lambert Grid Coordinates (North Zone) -
N 176, 376.52, E 1, 650, 378.61:
thence continuing southeasterly along said westerly- margin of County
Road No. 8, along a curve to the left havingla radius of 300 feet, '
the- center of which bears north 25°21'49" eapt, an arc distance of
50.74 feet;
;, thence south 74°13' 19" west, 68.84 feet;
thence south 83°41'02" west, 60.83 feet;
thence along .a curve to the right having a radius of. 667.96 feet the .
i center of which bears north 15°46'41" west, an arc distance of
• 108. 45 feet, more or less, to the easterly margin of the Chicago, _
Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company right-of-way;
thence northeasterly along said easterly margin, 24 feet more NNING ivisgoN
less, to the true point of beginning. CnyofiRENTON
SEP 2 9 1989.
Fi
SCHEDULE A
(Legal Description of Land)
C.C.A. TRACT
That portion of the Northwest quarter and Government Lot 1, in Section 24, Township 23 North,
Range 4 East of the Willamette Meridian; and the Southwest quarter and Government Lot 6, Section
13, Township 23 North, Range 4 East of the Willamette Meridian, all in King County, Washington more
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the,iron bolt marking, the center of Section 24, Township 23 North, Rang•
e.4 East of
the Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington;
THENCE North, 2,622.11 feet to quarter corner between Sections 13 and 24, in said Township and
Range;
THENCE North 87' 26' 48".West, along the North line of said Northwest quarter, 1,214.00 feet to the
Westerly margin of County Road No. 8, Charles Monster Road S.W. and now known as Steel Hill Road
and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this legal description;
THENCE South 32' 29' 51" East, along said Westerly margin, 85.34 feet to a point of tangent curvature
concave to the Southwest having a radius of 256.48 feet;
THENCE Southeasterly along said curve through an arc of 31° 04' 57", an arc length of 139.14 feet to a
point which is 30 feet Westerly, perpendicular to said centerline of Steel Hill Road;
THENCE South 01' 24' 51" East, along said Westerly margin, 268.00 feet;
THENCE South 88° 35' 09" West, 436.55 feet;
THENCE South 02'33' 12" West, 115.03 feet;
THENCE South 70' 05' 34" West, 95.47 feet;
THENCE South 88' 37' 17" West, 105.38 feet;
THENCE North 01' 22' 43" West, 887.90 feet to the Southerly margin of Charles Monster Road S.W.;
THENCE North 88' 03' 09' East, along said Southerly margin, 16.02 feet to a point of tangent
curvature concave to the South having a radius of 533.14 feet;
THENCE Easterly along said Southerly margin and said curve through an arc of 21' 12' 00", an arc
length of 197.27 feet;
THENCE South 70° 44' 51" East, along said Southerly margin, 143.37 feet to a point of tangent
curvature concave to"the South having a radius of 846.72 feet;,
THENCE Southeasterly along said Southerly margin and said curve through an arc of 05' 31' 13", an arc
length of 81.58 feet;
THENCE South 65' 13' 40" East, along said Southerly margin, 60.19 feet to a point of non-tangent
curvature from which the radius point bears South 41° 51' 56" West;
. THENCE Southeasterly, 70.00 feet along the arc of a 256.48 foot radius curve concave to the Southwest
through a central angle of 15' 38' 13' to said Westerly margin; .
THENCE South 32' 29' 51' East, along said West margin of Steel Hill Road, 83.38 feet to the TRUE •
POINT OF BEGINNING and terminus of this legal description.
TOGETHER WITH and subject to any easements and reservations of record.
PROJECT; CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA
December 21, 1988
Revised November 10, 1989
2614.02
•
Tf1TAI P
L?t P,""."? FYIV17,!ON
•
Eh DEC 1 2 1989 I 11
i
lance mueller
& associates
architects
BRUCE BLUME RENTON
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project is being developed by Bruce Blume & Company for
Sid Eland Distributing. After completion of the work Sid Eland
will assume ownership. ,
The project is being constructed as a two building complex for
distribution use of about 287,000 s.f. total area. Sid Eland
Beverage Company will occupy most of the large building. The
use of their space will consist of a .2-story office of 18,000
s.f. and the distribution warehouse. The balance of the building
will be used by Container Corporation for the storage of
corrigated paper products. The second building will be used
for beverage storage and paper storage.
Each building will be constructed for high piled storage with
a building height of around 30 feet. Exterior materials will
consist of smooth painted concrete with aluminum sash glazing
at office areas and dock height overhead doors at service areas.
All of the site except the unfilled wetland will be developed
with building, paving and landscaping.
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
SEP 2 9
1999
HECEIVED
130 lakeside • suite 250 • Beattie,washington 9B122 • 20B/325-2553 • fax:ROB]328-0554
lance mueller ale,cal • senior associates:robert oischewsky,elleen furney
associates:robert fedden,micheel geibreith,richard hernish,robert wells
a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by end under the supervision of registered architects
lance mueller
associates
architects
BRUCE BLUME RENTON
DRAINAGE SYSTEM
The property at present is bound on the south and west by an
elevated rail line. The northern boundary of the property is
the Oaksdale Blvd. The property gently slopes from the fill
of the road shoulder to the lowest elevation. The property
from the adjacent Container Corproation site on the east slopes
to the lowest point that is located in the central area of the
site. Drainage from the street flows onto this property.
Drainage from Container Corporation site discharges through a
culvert onto this site. As a result of construction of the
rail siding for Container Corporation and the construction of
that facility a wetland has emerged in the central area of the
site.
The drainage and detention system for this project will utilize
the existing drainage feature of the site. Storm water from
the developed paving areas will be collected in an underground
system or sheet drainaged into the wetland. Water from the
underground system will be biofiltrated prior to discharge.
Water from sheet drainage will be filtrated prior to entry by
grass areas. Roof drainage will be discharged into the project
system or directly to the wetland. The project biologist is
reviewing the drainage system and will make specific recom-
mendation on the effects to the wetlands and how to facilitate
the design.
Our geological and soils consultant has reviewed the site
drainage and hydrology. The present run off collects in the
central area of the site and enters the permeable layer of upper
soils and drains downward to the lower shallow gravel layers.
At that level it moves laterally to the west and into the
Green River. •
The system will compliment the existing site conditions and
have a positive effect on the wetlands. PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
SEP 2 9 1989
AECEIVED
130 lakeside • suite 250 • seattie,washington 8E1122 • 206/328-2553 • fax:(206]328-0554
lance mueller ale,cal • senior associates:robert oischewsky,eileen furney
associates:robert fedden,mlchael galbrelth;richard hernleh,robert wells
e washington corporation furnishing architectural serviced by end under the supervision of registered arohitects
WETLAND DELINEATION
OF THE
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA SITE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
Prepared for
Mr. James Garrison
Bruce Blume and Company
1100 Eastlake Avenue East, Suite 210
Seattle, WA 98109
•
Prepared by
Shapiro and Associates, Inc.
The Smith Tower, Suite 1400
506 Second Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
AUG 1 6 1989
June 1989
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I . INTRODUCTION 1
II.' OBJECTIVE 3
III. METHODOLOGY 3
A. Literature Review 3
B. Site Specific Investigation 4
1. Vegetation 4
2. Soils 6
3. Hydrology 6
IV. RESULTS 9
A. Triple Parameter Investigation 9
1. Vegetation • 9
2. Soils 10
3. Hydrology 12
V. SUMMARY 12
VI. REFERENCES 16
APPENDIX A: Data Sheets 17
List of Figures
Figure 1 Site Location/Vicinity Map 2
Figure 2 Wetland Delineation and Sample Plot Locations 15
List of• Tables
Table 1 Definition of Wetland Indicator Status 5
Table 2 Hydric Soil Indicator 7
Table 3 Hydrologic Regimes and Wetland Characteristics 8
Table 4 List of Common Plant Species on the Site 11
Table 5 Wetland Determination Based on Vegetation 11
Table 6 Wetland Determination Based on Soils 13
Table 7 Wetland Determination Based on Hydrology 13
Table 8 Summary of Triple Parameter Data 14
•
I. INTRODUCTION
GENERAL SITE DESCRIPTION
The Container Corporation of America site, an approximately 41-acre
parcel , is located in the City of Renton, in King County, Washington
(Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East) . The site is bounded by South
143rd Street to the north, 72nd Avenue on the east and south, and by the
Burlington Northern Railroad to the west (Figure 1) .
The site is generally flat, and lies at the foot of several fairly
steep slopes , some naturally occurring such as the hill leading up to 72nd
Avenue, and some created by fill deposited for a parking area and the
railroad bed. An access spur of the railroad bisects the property thus
creating two distinct sections. The first, and northern section is marked
by one large and one small area containing open water and emergent
vegetation such as cattails, soft rushes, willow, and red-osier dogwood.
The larger area is surrounded by wet meadow, while the smaller area is
surrounded by upland meadow. Nearly one-third of the remaining land in this
section is covered with wetland meadow grasses, while the rest is under a
complex mixture of upland grasses, with thistle, Scot 's broom, and Himalayan
blackberry along the periphery.
The second southern section, that is cut off by the railroad spur, also
contains an area of open water marked by cattails and an area covered with
predominantly reed canarygrass, but this portion of the site rises slightly
to the east and southeast, and grades into a meadow which is dominated by a
mixture of upland plant species similar to that described above. Between
the cattails and the upland meadow is a wet area containing mostly reed
canarygrass and velvetgrass, with small amounts of soft rush.
WETLAND DEFINITION AND AUTHORITY
Pursuant to the Clean Water Act and through the Section 404 permitting
process , the Corps of Engineers (Corps) has been given the responsibility
and authority to regulate the discharge of dredged or fill materials into
waters , including wetlands, of the United States (Federal Register, 1986) .
Wetlands are formally defined as ". . . those areas that are inundated or
saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient
to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions."
(Federal Register, 1980, 1982) .
Due to site conditions that suggest wetlands are present, and federal
regulation that controls filling of wetlands, the need to determine the
presence and extent of wetlands has become apparent in order to assess the
implication this may have on any future development plans .'
1
the
•
Lake Lake '
Puget :. Washington ••;' : Sammamish '
Sound Bellevue
• ercer Is
!• ,aw Issaquah
I\ 99 12.
' Site ' • Renton
4.�,t
b,....lkile Ilir SITE •
.405
ukwila ,� 1
.
Normandy a/ t,........_..w. S.W.,9th
Park 99 16 i
q
'---...� 3 s.w.znn�.
Des Moines /Kent
`--�s _ �.
•
�y � i � 9
.1 i <
5 ;
© I i = f
oi
I i
1
S.W.{,•t St.
S.W.lkd Si.
.. lg.
FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION/VICINITY MAP
TRIPLE PARAMETER INVESTIGATION SHfPIRO&.
CONTAINER CORP SITE
2
II . OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to use methods suggested in the Federal
Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands ( 1989) to
determine the presence and extent of wetlands on the subject property in
accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. If wetlands were
determined to be present, the wetland boundary was delineated.
III . METHODOLOGY
The analysis of wetlands conducted on this site was based on the
methodology developed by the Corps for implementation of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act. This methodology is commonly referred to as the Triple
Parameter Approach (Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation,
1989) . Two levels of investigation have been conducted for the analysis of
the wetlands on the subject property; these include: (1) review and
analysis of existing site-specific literature; and (2) a site-specific
investigation to adequately determine the presence and extent of wetlands.
The methodologies used in each of these two tasks are described below.
A. LITERATURE REVIEW
A review of existing information was conducted to identify any wetlands
or any site characteristics that would indicate wetlands on the subject
property. Several valuable resource documents were available for
preliminary review of the site conditions (see Reference Section for
complete listing) . References reviewed include:
. U.S. Geological Survey Renton Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series
Topographic, scale 1:24,000 (1949, rev. 1968, 1973).
. U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Hydric Soils of the State of
Washington (1985) .
. U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Soils Survey of King County Area
(Snyder, et al . , 1973) .
. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory,
Renton Quadrangle, (1973) .
Data sources were reviewed and used to gather preliminary information
about the vegetative, soils, and hydrologic characteristics of the site
prior to the site investigation.
3
•
B. SITE-SPECIFIC INVESTIGATION
An Intermediate-level Onsite Determination Method (Federal Manual for
Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, pp. 47-55) was used to
determine the wetland boundaries. Using this methodology, vegetative, soil
and hydrologic parameters were examined for wetland characteristics.
In order to determine the presence and extent of currently existing
wetlands on the site, sampling plots were established. The plots were
located in the central portion of homogenous areas of vegetative cover. An
homogenous area of vegetation cover can be comprised o.f a single species ,
such as one species of grass, or can be comprised of a number of species
that together make up a plant community. At each sampling plot, vegetation,
soils , and hydrology field data were collected and recorded on a data form
(see Appendix A) . The following paragraphs describe the steps used in
determining the presence of wetlands.
1. Vegetation
Within homogenous plant communities, vegetation sampling plots were
described by the percent cover of the different plant species occurring
within the herb, shrub and tree strata. For each sampling plot, trees
within a thirty foot radius , and shrubs within a five foot radius of the
observation point were identified and recorded on the data form. All
species within the unit were recorded in order of dominance on the data
sheet. Species considered to be dominant are those that have the highest
percent cover and in combination comprise over 50% of the total cover for
each vegetative stratum, plus any additional species having 20% or more of
the total cover for a given vegetative stratum. Dominant plant species were
determined by visual estimation for each vegetative layer.
Indicator status of the dominant species within each strata was used to
determine the presence of hydrophytic vegetation (vegetation adapted to
life in saturated or anaerobic soil conditions) within the vegetative
commmunity. The indicator status refers to the plants ' frequency of
occurring in wetlands and includes obligate, facultative and upland species .
Definitions for each indicator status are listed in Table 1. Species with
an indicator status of obligate (OBL) , facultative wetland, (FACW) or
facultative (FAC) are considered to be adapted for life in saturated or
anaerobic soil conditions. A list of common plant species has been compiled
by the Corps, and each species on the list has been assigned a wetland
indicator status .
A sampling plot is considered to have hydrophytic vegetation if greater
than 50% of the dominant species recorded on the data sheet have an
indicator status of FAC, FACW, or obligate OBL. In addition, for those
areas of homogenous vegetation cover where 25-50% of the dominant plants in
the plant community are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC and the soils and hydrology
parameters both exhibit wetland characteristics , the vegetation is
considered to be hydrophytic.
4
•
Table 1
DEFINITIONS OF INDICATOR STATUS
Indicator
Symbol Definition
OBL. Obligate. Species that are found in wetlands
approximately >99% or the time.
FACW Facultative wetland. Species that are found in
wetlands approximately 67% to 99% of the time.
FAC Facultative. Species that are found in wetlands
approximately 33% to 67% of the time.
FACU Facultative upland. Species that are found in
uplands approximately 67% to 99% of the time.
UPL Upland. Species that are found in uplands
approximately >99% of the time.
Note: Species with no indicator status shown on the data form have not been
given an indicator status , and are assumed to be upland.
Source: Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual , Environmental
Laboratory, 1987.
5
2. Soils
One characteristic of- wetlands is hydric soils. Hydric soils are
defined as. soils that are saturated , flooded , or ponded long enough during
the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (USDA
SCS, 1987) . The SCS in cooperation with the National Technical Committee
for Hydric Soils (NTCHS) has compiled a list of hydric soils in the United
States . The list identifies soil series mapped by the SCS that meet hydric
soil criteria. A map unit of upland (non-wetland) soil may have inclusions
of hydric soil that were not delineated on the map, or vice versa, however;
therefore, it is important to examine soils in the field to determine
whether they are hydric.
Due to the wet, anaerobic conditions, hydric soils exhibit certain
characteristics that can be observed in the field. Such characteristics or
indicators include the following: high organic content, accumulation of
sulfidic material , greenish or bluish grey color (called gley) , spots or
blotches of orange color (called mottles) , and dark soil colors (called low
soil chroma) . Table 2 summarizes the hydric indicators :
Soil samples were obtained within each vegetation unit either by
digging a soil pit or using a soil auger to a depth of at least 18 inches.
Soil sample were then examined for hydric indicators. Organic content was
estimated visually, sulfidic material was determined present if the soil
emitted an odor of rotten egg, and soil colors were determined by using a
Munsell soil color chart. Munsell soil color charts are used by soil
scientists to identify soil color by three components : hue, value, and
chroma. They provide a standardized method for identifying soil color. In
addition, if soils were found to be saturated within 18 inches of the
surface during the field investigation , they were identified as hydric.
Hydric soils are assumed to be present in any sample plot where the
vegetation community consists of either all donimant species with an •
indicator status of obligate, or all dominant species with an indicator
status of facultative wetland or obligate, and an abrupt wetland boundary is
evident, so that in these areas, soil data is not collected.
3. Hydrology
Water must be present in order for wetlands to exist; it need not be
present throughout the entire year, however. Wetland hydrology is
considered to be present when there is permanent or periodic inundation, or
soil saturation for a significant period (usually a week or more) during the
growing season (Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation,
1989) .
Observed indicators of wetland hydrology, including areas of ponding,
soil saturation observed within a soil pit, and evidence of previous water
inundation - such as dry algae on bare soil , or drainage patterns, were
recorded on the data form. Where positive indicators of wetland hydrology
were observed, it was assumed that wetland hydrology occurs for a
significant period of the growing season. Table 3 summarizes some of the
hydrologic regimes that can be encountered and their wetland
characteristics .
6
•
Table 2
HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS
Hydric Indicator Diagnostic Criteria
Organic content >50% by volume
Sulfidic material "Rotten egg" odor.
Soil color Matrix' chroma of 2 or less in mottled soils .
Matrix chroma of 1 or less in unmottled soils.
• Gleyed soils.
• Water saturation Groundwater table at less than 1.5 feet from the
surface for a
significant period (usually a week
9
or more) during the growing season.
Source: Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual , Environmental
Laboratory, 1987.
•
•
•
•
•
7
Table 3
HYDROLOGIC REGIMES AND WETLAND CHARACTERISTICS
Duration* of
Degree of Inundation Inundation or Wetland
or Saturation Saturation Characteristics
Permanently inundated** 100% present
Semipermanently to nearly >75% - <100% present .
permanently inundated or
saturated***
Regularly inundated or >25% - <75% usually
saturated present
•
Seasonally inundated or >12.5% - <25% often
saturated present
Irregularly inundated >5% - <12.5% often
or saturated absent
Intermittently or never <5% absent
inundated or saturated
*percent of growing season
**inundation > 6.6 ft. mean water depth
***inundation < or = 6.6 ft. mean water depth
Source: Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual , Environmental
Laboratory, 1987.
8
Wetland Determination
Triple parameter data for each sample plot were evaluated to determine
the presence or absence of wetlands. Under Corps regulation if positive
wetland indicators for all three parameters were, or would normally be,
present during a significant portion of the growing season, then a wetland
determination was made for that homogenous area of vegetation cover repre-
sented by the sample plot. If no evidence was found that the area repre-
sented by the sample plot would normally display wetland indicators for all
three parameters, then the area was determined to be upland.
IV. RESULTS
On 10 February 1989, five sample plots were established on the property
and on June 7, 1989 an additional four sample plots were established. The
field forms containing vegetation, soils, and hydrology data are presented
in Appendix A.
TRIPLE PARAMETER INVESTIGATION
1. Vegetation
• Common and scientific names of plant species identified at the site are
presented in Table 4. Scientific nomenclature of all plant species
encountered follows that of Hitchcock and Cronquist (1973) .
The literature did not indicate there were wetlands on the property.
This site was not investigated during the King County Wetlands Inventory,
(1981) nor. was it identified as containing wetlands by the USFWS National
Wetland Inventory (1984) . A previous site visit in March 1988 by SHAPIRO
indicated the presence of both wetland and upland vegetation. The
February 10, 1989 and June 7, 1989 site surveys revealed that the property
contains several distinct vegetative communities: open water with cattails ,
wet meadow, dry meadow, and scrub/shrub wetland.
The open water areas were populated with common cattails and soft rush.
The largest of the three open water marshes was bordered by a dense stand of
willow and red-osier dogwood, all of which have been classified as hydro-
phytic by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Reed, 1988) . Drainage from
these areas was impeded. in part by construction of the existing Container
Corporation building and by the railroad spur bed. The slopes leading into
the open water were covered with Himalayan blackberry and Scot's broom,
upland species.
Immediately surrounding the pockets of open water was.a wet meadow or
scrub/shrub wetland. The wet meadows are dominated by a mosaic of redtop
bentgrass, velvetgrass, meadow foxtail , soft rush, and reed canarygrass.
Because of the irregular distribution of the various species, each with a
very distinct morphology, the meadow has become hummocky, and during the
9
February 10, 1989 site visit, was ponded and frozen in small local
depressions. Several areas were virtually entirely reed canarygrass ; no
other species completely dominated any section of the wet meadow. The wet
meadow graded into dry meadow with small increases in elevation. Bluegrass ,
wheatgrass , tall fescue, thistle, Scot 's broom, and Himalayan blackberry
dominated the dry meadow areas. The scrub/shrub wetland area is dominated
by willows.
Eight of the nine sample plots have positive indicators for hydrophytic
vegetation; these plots represent both the open water marsh and wet meadow
communities. A summary of these results are presented in Table 5.
2. Soils
Soils on the site have been mapped by the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation
Service (SCS) (Snyder, et al . , 1973). The SCS indicates that four distinct
soil series may be found on the property: Puget silty clay loam, Beausite
gravelly sandy loam (6 - 15% slopes) , Beausite gravelly sandy loam (15 -30%
slopes) , and Urban land (soil that has been modified by disturbance by
additions of fill material ). Of these, the Puget silty clay loam has been
classified as a hydric soil (SCS, 1985) . While the others have not been
classified as hydric, SCS mapping units commonly have inclusions of other
soils that are not noted because they are too small to map at the scale of
the survey. Often these inclusions can be classified as hydric soils.
The field investigation concentrated on the level areas, thus no soil
pits were dug into the steep slopes surrounding the property. Consequently,
Beausite soils do not figure prominently in making wetland determinations on
this site.
Of the remaining area, the results show that two different soils exist
on this site. The first , developing under dry meadow vegetation, was a weak
to dusky red silt loam to a depth of 14 inches. Below this the soil became
somewhat grey, and displayed slight mottling and some gley formation. Fine
and medium roots were common within six inches of the surface. There were
no roots in evidence below a depth of roughly eight inches. Despite indi -
cations that this soil does experience ephemeral wetting (gleying and mot-
tling) at depth, these factors were only slightly expressed and then only
well below the rooting zone. Accordingly, this soil was identified as non-
hydric due to its deep and very limited hydric characteristics.
The second soil dominated the wet meadow community. This soil was
marked by high organic matter content, a dark grey color, common mottling,
strong gley development, and was saturated to the point of inundation in
many places. All these are strong indicators of hydric soils. This soil
became darker, further increased in organic matter content, and was
inundated as the wet meadow graded into the emergent communities.
Eight of the nine sample plots have positive indicators for hydric
soils. These plots represent the open water cattails and wet meadow
vegetative communities. Plot #3 is in an area that proved to be somewhat
anomalous , as it was dominated by dry meadow vegetation but was developed on
weakly hydric soils. A summary of the soils data are presented in Table 6.
10
Table 4
LIST OF COMMON PLANT SPECIES
AT THE CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA SITE
IN RENTON, WASHINGTON
Wetland
Scientific Name Common Name Indicator Status*
Shrubs :
Cornus stolonifera Red-osier dogwood FACW
Cytisus scoparius Scot's broom UPLAND.
Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry FACU-
Salix spp. Willow FAC-OBL
Grasses and Forbs :
Agrostis alba Redtop FACW
Agropyron sp. Wheatgrass FACU
Alopecuris prantensis Meadow foxtail FACW
Cirsium avense Canada thistle FACU+
Festuca arundinacea Tail fescue FACU
Holcus lanatus Velvet grass FAC
Juncus effusus Soft rush FACW+
Phalaris arundinacea Reed canarygrass FACW
Poa spp. Bluegrass UPL-FACW+
Ranunculus repens Buttercup FACW
Typha latifolia Common cattail OBL
Note: Species with no indicator status listed are assumed to be FACU or
UPL.
*As defined in Table 1.
Table 5
WETLAND DETERMINATION BASED ON VEGETATION
AT THE
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA SITE
IN RENTON, WASHINGTON
% of # of species
Wetland that are FAC,
Plot # Determination FACW, or OBL
1 wetland 67
2 wetland 100
3 upland 0
4 wetland 100
5 wetland • 50
6 wetland 100
7 wetland 100
g wetland 100
9 wetland . 100
11
3. Hydrology
Several surface water drainages occur on the site. During the February
site visit, there were three distinct areas marked by persistent standing
water. The first was a small depression at the northern end of the
property, the second encompassing the open water emergent vegetative
community, and the third just south of the railroad spur. Stormwater is
being directed into the largest wetland area from the building to the east.
In addition, there was water ponded in many areas of the wet meadow, this
largely due to the hummocky nature of the meadow. During the June 7, 1989
site visit, standing water was present only in the open water emergent
vegetative community, while the depression at the northern end of the
property and the area just south of the railroad spur had become dry.
No channelized flow was detected on the property. Based upon direct
observation and the presence of hydric soils, six of the nine sample plots
have positive indicators for wetland hydrology. Table 7 presents th.e
results of the hydrological data.
Wetland Determination
Based 9n the Triple Parameter Methodology, six plots were identified as
wetland, and three plots were identified as upland. Table 8 shows the
results of the investigation. Boundaries of each wetland were identified at
20 to 50 foot intervals using orange-and-white striped flags that were
numbered sequentially for that area and coded with a letter code unique to
each wetland. It is estimated that the total wetland area located on the
property is approximately 4.7 acres. The approximate locations of the four
wetland areas on the site are illustrated in Figure 2. The size and outline
of the wetland boundaries are only approximate and should not be used for
site planning purposes; a more accurate mapping of th.e wetland boundaries
are present in the "Topographic and Wetland Survey" map drawn on June 19,
1989 by Bush, Roed and Hitchings, Inc. , Civil Engineers and Surveyors.
V. SUMMARY
Pursuant to the Clean Water Act, and through the Section 404 permitting
process, the Corps has been given the responsibility and authority to
regulate the discharge of fill materials into wetlands of the United States.
In January 1987, the Corps released a wetlands delineation manual are re-
ferred to as the "Triple Parameter Approach" to identify and delineate wet-
lands. Under this methodology, wetland vegetation, hydric soils, and wet-
land hydrology all must be present in order to have a positive wetland de-
termination. Using this methodology, the Container Corporation of America
site was investigated on February 10, 1989 and June 7, 1989, for the
presence of wetlands. The Container Corporation of America site contains at
least three habitat types , two of which are wetland habitats. Using the
Triple Parameter Approach, four wetland areas were identified and
delineated. There is a total of approximately 4.7 acres of wetland habitat
located on the site.
12
Table 6
WETLAND DETERMINATION BASED ON SOILS DATA
AT THE CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA SITE
IN RENTON, WASHINGTON
Matrix Organic
Plot # Color Mottling Content Determination
1 10 YR 4/1 yes <50% hydric
2 10 YR 4/1 yes >50% hydric
3 2.5YR 4/2 yes >50% hydric
4 10 YR 4/1 yes >50% hydric
5 2.5YR 4/2 no <50% non-hydric
6 10 YR 5/2.5 yes <50% hydric
7 10 YR 5/2 yes <50% hydric
8 10 YR 5/2 yes <50% hydric
•
9 NDC* hydric
*NDC - no data collected
Table 7
WETLAND DETERMINATION BASED ON HYDROLOGY DATA
AT THE CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA SITE
IN RENTON, WASHINGTON
Hydrology
Plot # Determination Basis for Determination
1 upland no soil saturation
2 wetland soil saturation
3 upland no soil saturation
4 wetland soil saturation
5 upland no soil saturation
6 wetland assumed based on hydric soils
7 wetland assumed based on hydric soils
8 wetland assumed based on hydric soils
9 wetland assumed based on hydric soils
13
Table 8
SUMMARY OF TRIPLE PARAMETER DATA
AT THE CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA SITE
IN RENTON, WASHINGTON
Wetland
Plot # Vegetation Soils Hydrology Determination
1 wetland non-hydric upland upland
2 wetland hydric wetland wetland
3 upland hydric upland upland
4 wetland hydric wetland wetland
5 wetland non-hydric upland upland
6 wetland hydric wetland wetland
7 wetland hydric assumed wetland
wetland
8 wetland hydric assumed wetland
wetland
9 wetland hydric wetland wetland
14
_ MONSTER RD S.W.
V F
.N.
v/ ... ,,
.. _ ,
OfL ,
METRO PARCEL
' /......-=:N------ -------/-7
/
( N. ` i
•\......,/
I c I ,
/::::X
1 I Vti Aggil *PI
.,.' Y, ' '
�o �
\ 1
l O /4,4
� � NOTE: This map is for orientation purposes only
and is not intended for jurisdictional or site planning
1 purposes. A more accurate map of the wetlands can
___.„7„.
\--"-......,___ result from a survey by a qualified land surveyor
of the flagged wetland edge.
FIGURE 2
•
WETLAND DELINEATION ID
-, A WETLANDS NOT ToSCALE
TRIPLE PARAMETER INVESTIGATION SHAPIRO&
CONTAINER CORP SITE O PLOT NUMBER AND LOCATION A, IA 1
•
VI. REFERENCES
Cowardin, L.M. , V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe, 1979. Classification
of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States . U.S.D.I. Fish
and Wildlife Service.
Environmental Laboratory, 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual . Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi .
Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation , 1989. Federal Manual
for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington,
D.C. Cooperative technical publication. 107 pp.
Federal Register, 1980. 40 CFR Part 230: Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines for
Specification of Disposal Sites of Dredged or Fill Material . Vol . 45,
No. 249, pp. 85352-8535.3, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington,
D.C.
Federal Register, 1982. Title 33: Navigation and Navigable Waters; Chapter
II , Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers . Vol 47, No. 138,
p. 31810, U.S. Goverment Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Federal Register, 1986. 40 CFR Parts 320 through 330: Regulatory Programs
of the Corps of Engineers ; Final Rule. Vol . 51. No. 219. pp.
41206-41260, U.S. Goverment Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Hitchcock , C.L. , and A. Cronquist, 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest.
University of Washington Press , Seattle. ISBN 0-295-95273-3.
Munsell Color, 1988. Munsell Soil Color Charts, Kollmorgen Instruments
Corp. , Baltimore, Maryland.
Reed, P.B. , Jr. , 1988. National List of Plant Species That Occur in
Wetlands : 1988, Northwest (Region 9) . USFWS Biological Report 88
(26.9) .
Snyder, D.E. , P.S. Gale, and R.F. Pringle, 1973. Soil Survey of King County
Area, Washington. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service.
Soil Conservation Service, 1987. Hydric Soils of the United States.
U.S.D.A.
16
Appendix A
17
• - WETLAND DETERMINATION '
TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROAG.
Site Gon-i Jn err- Ger F. Date Z//o/09 Staff Krb/A G . Plot# i
VEGETATION
Trees Status % cover Herbs Status % cover
Q' 0 Sof+ ru54, o
0 Q Velve-4gro-S`o FP-C.- 30
0 Zev,+ gr° ' FP -VJ 41-D
0 0 (...A.9ro 5-Frs 6-1 b o.)
•
0 0
Shrubs Status % cover
0
0
0
0
.
% of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: G 7%
% cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 6,o Hydrophytic vegetation? Ye
SOILS •
Series/Phase Pu a On hydric soils list? V e-s
A horizon: depth 0-4" matrix color -s Yv.3/2 mottle color mo+tg*depth of sample S "
Soil.type: (sand,clay, etc.) I+ Loam
B horizon: depth 14-4 matrix color ,/Dyr• ' ' mottle color,/ovr. 4/6 depth of sample_ •
Soil type: (sand,clay, etc.) IA- L •
Gleyed? 1,54 be I 14" Other indicators.
Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration &"
Approximate % organic content (by volume) < 5O% Texture Apra -so�dy
.Hydric soils? A- Hor r 2-on Basis Kih ro mra rn n 4-I•l P t
Only •
HYDROLOGY
•
Inundated? No Depth of standing water /Vo h e
Saturated soils? pa no of is" Depth to saturated soils 7 is""
Describe obvious topographic features, if any: / /_+-
Wetland hydrology? NO Basis !-Joule/ e.xpecf- t-viore. Cv
+1"► ,e. 0 c Ye-4-r
Normal Circumstances? ilo Atypical situation? pisfuti ioeci
Wetland determination up/ouid Basis NYdrolom } Soils
Comments: -t"h15 ,5 a +ro-ry i4-1onb-1 are off- So!) vr4rla:n b,4
hydriC Sods ) ,,)ell below -f-he roo*/, zone,,
18
WETLAND DETERMINATION •
Ir,vJIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROAC..
Site Gon-iwoe Co'-P• Date Z/io Staff KPH/AL Plot#
VEGETATION
Trees Status % cover Herbs Status % cover
o 0 L.e4i 6a1'14kryero_5S FPl�l /00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Shrubs Status % cover
0
0
0
0
0
of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: /00.
% cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: ioo Hydrophytic vegetation? yes
SOILS
Series/Phase f u On hydric soils list? Ye-s
A horizon: depth O-/e." matrix color/o vr• ¢/1 mottle color oyr Veo depth of sample 8"
Soil type: (sand, day, eta) S,I+- 1,004Y)
B horizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample_
Soil type: (sand, day, etc.) .
Gleyed? do Other indicators
Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration Cv''
Approximate % organic content (by volume) Texture Non- so-n.ly
Hydric soils? Yew Basis Ghromo& Mo+4-Ie-•am
•
HYDROLOGY
Inundated? No Depth of standing water None--
Saturated soils? Ye-s Depth to saturated soils ¢''
Describe obvious topographic features, if any: Flat-
Wetland hydrology? Yes Basis o.4-u ra+iov, ro +'vn�
Normal Circumstances? YPS Atypical situation?
Wetland determination 104,8 Basis Soils N IroloJj I vje c +Ioi
Comments: Mar Keciefo 4•
19
WETLAND DETERMINATION
TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROAL._
Site 6on7L0.1rier Grp. Date z/io Staff KRb/A Plot #
VEGETATION
Trees Status % cover Herbs Status °/Q cover
0 0 foa -sP. ? I D°
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Shrubs Status % cover
0
0
0
0
0
% of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: z• GQnno+ Key cyc-o.ss
% cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: ? Hydrophytic vegetation? +r? Spec' ar +hls
+1 r . o c year,
SOILS
Series/Phase Pwae._47- / Urba-vn On hydric soils list? Ye-5 •
A horizon: depth 0-•S« matrix color z.sy 4/2, mottle color z.TY 5/!o depth of sample C.0"
Soil type: (sand, clay,.eta) Loam •
B horizon: depth, No matrix color mottle color depth of sample_
•
Soil type: (sand,day, etc.)
Gleyed? Ye-s Other indicators
Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration "
Approximate % organic content (by volume) 7 50% Texture Non- hard y
Hydric soils? Basis Mo4-4'Ie5 r.\Orow�a} i_l P
•
HYDROLOGY
Inundated? No Depth of standing water Nhe—
Saturated soils? Damp a+ (v" Depth to saturated soils 7 I S"
Describe obvious topographic features, if any: Eloe
Wetland hydrology? Mo Basis Pe,R/d exR'c. F P �
oc yeU,r in we.-too- •
Normal Circumstances? No Atypical situation? 014fu rh,.d
Wetland determination marl ior,,./ 0plana Basis yydroJc , Ve y.-a�-,ov, ,r)(on‘,/u ve_
Comments:
20
WETLAND DETERMINATION
,.,.,DIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROA_:Site (ten-)-corer (ov p. Date Z/Io Staff Plot# 4
VEGETATION
Trees Status % cover Herbs Status % cover
0 0 geed C-4u^c ry 5ra5S FAL W (_o0
0 Ve.1ue,- cv-o.SS FP,L- Z'C
0 0 Soc- ,- 12 , FALW 4" !
0 0 ActroSk Alb 0, FPL� 5
0 0
Shrubs Status % cover
0
0
0
0
0 •
of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: ioo
'% cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: ioo Hydrophytic vegetation? yes
SOILS
Series/Phase /ur1 o v\ On hydric soils list? Y L1ke-k')
A horizon: depth 0-I(" matrix color/ovi-.4A mottle color ioyr.52' depth of sample i"
Soil type: (sand,day, eta) GI ay Loom
B.horizon: depth. No matrix color_____ mottle color depth of sample_
Soil type: (sand,day, etc.) •
Gleyed? E low /04 Other indicators
Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration
Approximate % organic content (by volume) < so% Texture Non - s ,dy
Hydric soils? Ye-s Basis. GI,rc. ) Mo++l ) (i IP ••
HYDROLOGY
•
Inundated? No Depth of standing water
Saturated soils? Yew Depth to saturated soils 4-"
Describe obvious topographic features, if any: Flab
Wetland hydrology? Yew Basis -Vro-*-1 ov) •
Normal Circumstances? Ye Atypical situation? Die -Vvrheci 5‘k-e
Wetland determination hie_A-1aoA Basis Is) Vegf*:� �,nn . N,3dro\o0s,
Comments: r,4,5 area .kc,c1 heo,,-b� poking ct.reaS w14-1, (AN-o.i I Cover
21
WETLAND DETERMINATION
M.,.,II IED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACt.
Site EGA Date a/ha Staff K.rbl Ac- . Plot# 5
VEGETATION
Trees Status % cover Herbs Status % cover
0 0 Reed 45
0 0 Qoo. sir, ? ZS
0 0 Tv.%s}\e, Fiac -oBl
0 Ve\oe-V �Yo� FAL z5
01 0
Shrubs Status % cover
0
0 •
0
0
0
%o of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAG: 70% or-.9rem-4-e.r-
cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 709'o Hydrophytic vegetation? Yes -z.-sea oh reeisk
Cp.ncxv gY o ss aid
SOILS velvet V9rasS ,
Series/Phase ?uc e.-1- J t)rban On hydric soils list? Yes(
A horizon: depth o-i�" matrix color(Ps)/ 4/z mottle color depth of sample 9"
Soil type: (sand,clay, etc.) 51 1*- Leo- i •
B horizon: depth — matrix color mottle color depth of sample_
Soil type: (sand,day,etc.)
Gleyed?. No Other indicators
Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration 5-G" •
Approximate % organic content (by volume) Texture 6//4 J
i-fydric soils? Na Basis
•
HYDROLOGY
inundated? No Depth of standing water > I a"
Saturated soils? Na Depth to saturated soils > i 8"
Describe obvious topographic features, if any: 0- 2% Slop-
Wetland hydrology? No Basis •
Normal Circumstances? Y/s Atypical situation?
Wetland determination /Uo Basis Hydra/Q 5 ) ' 14,
Comments:
22
WETLAND DETERMINATION
_DIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROA
Site („ordo i,i<r (`o r p, Date 6- 7 - SDI Staff PP& ) (•,( Plot # 6
VEGETATION
Trees Status % cover Herbs Status % cover
0 0 pha10.\-- cz.ea FAGkI I DD
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Shrubs Status % cover
0
0
0
0
0
% of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 'co%
•
% cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: roo zQ Hydrophytic vegetation? y&s
SOILS
Series/Phase Pjck On hydric soils list? Yes
A horizon: depth 0-/P>" matrix colorroyr l,smottle color 7,5rr•s%� depth of sample^ ID"
Soil type: (sand,day, etc.) I+-y rlo.
B horizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample..
Soil type: (sand, day, etc.)
Gleyed? Other indicators
Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration
Approximate % organic content (by volume) Texture Non- ridy
Hydricsoils? >'e' Basis he_a.)►Ij mn++IPri rwln) -k o.v,vwwk
HYDROLOGY
Inundated? /VD Depth of standing water (ev deva {-L \-ao-e w s �urwockeci
Saturated soils? Aio Depth to saturated soils > IS"
Describe obvious topographic features, if any: F10-+ 0.Yep. !-o x r1 04 uY
Wetland hydrology? A�s.,uwiecl Basis hciriL �1I s) dr e1 up ptd a a-.
Normal Circumstances? Atypical situation?
Wetland determination yes Basis wtlavlcl Ve •sod s
Comments:
23
WETLAND DETERMINATION
TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROX...
Site Goh--ainev. (-01-p. Date 6/2/81 Staff Gam, Plot # 1
VEGETATION
Trees Status % cover Herbs Status °A, cover
0 0 Agros�,s 0,160_ FPCA4 75-
0 pFt,alaris arandlnaLerxe- it 10
OAIoPeu,r15 pro_+e_es15 ,� z
0 A�-oPy,ron SP• FAc,v z
0 Ho IGut I c-vAo,-4k5 EP.C. •
Shrubs Status % cover p jLoAcks
0
0
0 •
0
0
% of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: ,'oo
% cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 95 Hydrophytic vegetation? Yes
SOILS
Series/Phase P' c e-4- On hydric soils list? Yes
. A horizon: depth matrix colorioyr• s-Z mottle color7svr: depth of sample /0"
Soil type: (sand, day, etc.) S%l a-v ri I oam
B horizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample_
Soil type: (sand, day, etc.)
Gleyed? Other indicators
Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration
Approximate % organic content (by volume) Texture Horn- sad y
Hydric soils? vas Basis keo-v; I w,erk-i-lPd on ram- c.-11avrnc.a s
•
HYDROLOGY
Inundated? No Depth of standing water
Saturated soils? Nc Depth to saturated soils 7
Describe obvious topographic features, if any:
Wetland hydrology? Yes Basis A'vst-WY1Cd oh hiidr,L So,lS .
Normal Circumstances? Yes Atypical situation?
Wetland determination Ye.s Basis 1•q -IQvd Y/cj . £ So)J4 ,
Comments: Assumed I-lydrol y
24
•
WETLAND DETERMINATION
MVUIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH .
Site 6e,471-Uirner Torp. Date (P/-7/9 Staff AU , Plot # 8
VEGETATION
Trees Status % cover Herbs Status % cover
0 0 Pho-lay-I,, ace.ae. FAGv/ ZS
0 0 PriorpeGurIs pro4ens)S a 4-0
0 0 Ro.nunc.ulus repo-v1s • „ zo
0 0 ,c ro.b+ls albo, i s
0 0
Shrubs Status % cover
0
0
0
0
0
of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: /DO
% cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: /oo Hydrophytic vegetation? Ye '
SOILS
Series/Phase P uo e)r On hydric soils list? Yes
A horizon: depth o-is*" matrix color/oyr 7e mottle color ?c vr 67a depth of sample z io"
Soil type: (sand, day, etc.) Ai/-fy t'Iay too ,
B horizon: depth — matrix color — mottle color — depth of sample_.
Soil type: (sand, day, etc.)
Gleyed? Other indicators —
Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration
Approximate % organic content (by volume) < so 0/0 Texture A/on - sancl y
Hydric soils? Yes Basis hPavt Iy vtio441ed 6.1000 rood- xnelS
•
HYDROLOGY
Inundated? No Depth of standing water —
Saturated soils? ,vo Depth to saturated soils > s "
Describe obvious topographic features, if any: F/a7/- uv- nef)v- w' How
Wetland hydrology? Yes roed Basis k t.Ori r 5 •
Normal Circumstances? YeS Atypical situation?
Wetland determination Yez, Basis t,14-bond Ye.43 'J Is , assum kbd logy,
Comments:
•
25
WETLAND DETERMINATION
r..__nIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROAL
Site( I)4T-Cttj?r7' ��r4,C). Date 6,-7- , 1 Staff , , Plot # Gl
VEGETATION
Trees Status %cover Herbs Status % cover
0 OHolcus f ovtA ,S FAL(nl 50
0 0alOpecur1S prei-eV VS t! I a
0 0 Typl a Ian Srollo. O5L- iS
0 0 Jruv�us egCrugv,5 Fa.c,t„1 7
0 0 F«4 a'4yl. IYI cveA. 1-AG U'
Shrubs Status % cover
0
0
0
0
0
% of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: ico
% cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 9 -7 Hydrophytic vegetation? Ye-
SOILS
Series/Phase Puge-k On hydric soils list? Yes
A horizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample
Soil type: (sand, clay, etc.)
B horizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample_
Soil type: (sand,clay, etc.)
Gleyed? Other indicators
Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration
Approximate % organic content (by volume) Texture
Hydric soils? Y S Basis A -,,ory,ec
•
HYDROLOGY
inundated? No Depth of standing water
Saturated soils? No Depth to saturated soils ? 18"
Describe obvious topographic features, if any:
Wetland hydrology? Yes Basis Assu.med 1o0.4-erl ova �, d�-« 1 Is .
Normal Circumstances? Yes Atypical situation?
Wetland determination yes Basis Ail don/. \/P . sop. are 0L2,1- 1-0
Comments: eoky.ao-v,..3
�1v��rL �101iS a. uvAeck,
26
pF R�
A.� j, ECF. l• /aa- 9
, z City of Renton l.u: SA -B9
S go(
o
9A
o ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST.
' 1 o sEpls°P
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW,`requires all
governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making •
decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared .for.'allproposals
with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of'the environment. '.The purpose •
of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts
from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)
and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants: .;
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the
environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS.
Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best
description you can. .
You must answer each question accurately and carefully. to the best of your
knowledge. In most cases. you should be able to answer the questions from your own
observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know
the answer. or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does
Inot apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations. such as zoning, shoreline. and
landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the
governmental agencies.can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal. even if you plan to do
them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional
information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The •
agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide
additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impacts.
Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly)
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be -
answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION. complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR
NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies. plans and programs),
the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant." and "property or site"
should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
•
A. BACKGROUND
•
1. Name of proposed project. if applicable:
•
13�M 171 g113c1-J c J FAcit../TY
2. Name of applicant: f3 1301.1l JI
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
4. Date ch�t prepared: q�(2.-
•
5. Agency requesting checklist: Li,A NI.0111
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
4a D As Soon AS AtiewOR •
a119s7p4o is(1w v„ {A' ,its 0ap Ass P—S( . MANNING DIVISION
CrlyoF F ENTON
SEP 2.9 1989
• RECEIVED
IVED
r//2
7. Do you have any _..:_ for future additions expansions. __ further activityrelated
P� P u
to or connected with this proposal? if yes. explain. '.
GoA. S ve r $LPG i$+ A5 ?-A3t- /2. cpg. - 7,§0,
Title As3 13t474 'A
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
FM, 0,99 Alrr3 Or- w&ir s' . rr tt Q690lar
4. p6LINJt4p-ri 0/4.) Pr2-#+0 1�6
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes. explain. ..
Fly 0,639 3c% OF AJ t 6E.0 Kd-Isr� i�Ppz/G19lbw
i 10. List any governmental approvals_ or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
if known.
cexe eF ' 4 6W S -- V / -49-s j . afelpig, pop7-
tom- Pt - � P 44.9iu
%, fv
1�otuv(w6 P� — '+ TT'1�J6 •
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and
the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist
that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page.
CvOCTr/e — A ' *itch, 13Vtt-00 A) Pis vri,D./J
fl9••c14L4Ty OF , -wpo • Si(935
#vie- ) /h
• ,01,57,v,t3u r/w C Hpro,uy fb, .57 /20962' OF i? p c
fizoove.7.7.4 awn*vie,* CoR pU/i•V Ave, 13 Wad- Be
Cot06772L4-rx), 6 sa0A-) fi 6i2. 0S0Ai.0
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project. including a street address, if any. and
section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While ,you
should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate
maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
akidevkt/. Avg. S,(*(1. / deg' 4 frizz) ,C-F-611--. tk, ,z,p *ex)
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS . •
1. : EARTH • •
a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep
slopes, mountainous, other $
' b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2c2Z f
.sue- 477,96H6-10 v$cvrz✓rr • '
c. What general types •of soils are found on the site (for example. caly, sand.
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know'the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland. : ,
Soft c !Ill(, P Ste- .. . 0.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
W PTZ-A1-ID A176453 e90 S F
•
- 2 -
•
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate yu..itities of any filling or
• grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. •
fl tA- th' 6F•69110& Qv Z nWOO 151 4A6S.
4 av l?Y Saves 5e6 C6TJ,' c r�
f. Could erosion occur as a resultOr clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
Cg A-WFO OP 57 T • By TI/i/Z'v4 .y 4.1.u Go,�rrzov
Prsa2.)
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
•
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any:
�44� 41/1bU-& Gv PS . a- Arr./xi-tab Arr./xi-tab DeSc,e2,/'Ti'')
Of ,0474.)46g 6 X6re 1
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and
when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if known.
u6r. VEy/cc'E ,/7f/56.; 436 4FTE/L Cow L� -tTIDr�
B aa.i /seJ #6e,'7" £Qv/PM OUT /6 d s
b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? T��.t-
� /= ,T-
72*ie Pg F;cr ...
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,
if any: Co, )p lJ1ri- l/01-11c.L ' f/f 6/d,!,7 67zas.
.�uor Cox-JrX0C., itze.eE' ,Di_me a..9G
Gr»srn.vc-rea‘J
3. WATER
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state
what stream or river it flows into.
A'O.196 Jr S/7-6.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site
that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
tz. 11 76Az/.gc_ Wi ..L. a?a i-1 ,1",240Y6e
6err- Tom, d z.y
Etc G9u -ricaJ 1 ._, y. in-81-i G, •ice IJET
1112- W c, Re- A.
PAS!/vvs 17:037 '
/
4) Will the pi sal require surface water withdr ils or diversions? Give
general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. •
5*Merl- w j W t gj O ;,gr-r 7 i49-1,Afo vg
1)Es-scitep
5) Does phe proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on
the site plan.
•
6) Does i the proposal involve any discharges es of waste materials to surface
waters? If so. describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of.
discharge.
b. Ground:
1) Will round water be withdrawn, or willwater be discharged
9, d g d to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if
knownl'.
"ICIR WATW1 Wu/1- 13E 12112-{e 772
w�`� vAJi joky Pox,./:u LI dam..
13E• ' .. D ,gA T6rc B
. I � ��� Y... �viet pp AZT/pc,
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial. containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
numbek of houses to be served (if applicable). or_the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
riAY j4ra f rri s Wf a6`"41
1' 'r€ Pv ev 6,e4s,raii
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collectlion and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so. describe.
':Thpi-EV/Ve SC)12-4 LC Au A-) rrzs�r-� ig ci l��V 4 k�icc
BQD��I.1 4-• .T,-'m T • . ..
• rt6 O�TE'U7caJ ift,p,Cy, ..
•
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If .so. generally
describe.
‘1/17-4reig WAIN*. r-J0ki 771194/ eit—WAITRZ— 5P-PdfiR4PCW-
•
OG4��74 7?7 Gtleppe uP.S Ateivive4,Es \Aii44J
SE oef '#0iLTi29TE-[0 ,+$Y ahlE tierz-+94
.•
•
. •
- 4 -
r).
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any: _
•
tiA140g9 eit1/4) 917E
. ,
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
16e—deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
o Shrubs
ug grass
o crop or grain
SWet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other-
o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other •
c—other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
qq ArfX5 Or--- hie e-A /4S' , 8E
ria012. &44.66 3, , Au -rfrfP1241#674074
Afga--46 1"11Z-e-• SE Cov6.4isb
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
• -
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve
or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
AUG morvr gft-frilf,moce. ttlfir14}7k42,57')..41oriil Cfry 4-idiog-oveb
1260, 2=i .20 dr/31-e_, Gin>
: -
•
5. 0
Animals 4P,V2- ve.40 .4-01A-)405c-4-10‘
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site •
or are known to be on or near the site: • ,
Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle(JongbiejA, other
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. .
141/4)(9(4-)/0
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
•
• •
•
- 5 -
1,•••..ga am...1a.am a me a6. 16!III•
d. Proposed rr.___ures to preserve or enhance wildli.-. .f any:. '
•
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove. solar) will be
used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it •
will be used for heating, manufacturing. etc.
.6iTY Fe`o- «- t 6 e
off`lf- AiRci0 lam -rvy A�1mi, ,b-p 'AirmAtiefrr
WA ( �s T�. 7a gra. ppepocir P
542 rz r a.
1 '
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe. '
No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce, or control energy
impacts, if any:
G 7#4fC wig , y' Cam,
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. .
Ftrze
`6cAGE
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if
any:
NoPE
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? •
•
2) What types levals of noise would be create or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate ,what hours noise would come
from the site.
4G�
geFtt
If. in..) PVr u6. C '1 Ttl-Z a/V ..
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
if
8. Land and Shoreline Use •
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
VA6A 7"
b. Has the site been used for agriculture?LL If so, describe.
I.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
Peija—
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? •
PO
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the site?
h. Has any part•of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, Asp�eciify.
495
i. . Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed •
project?_
�2© / fAx./ Hum
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if.any:.
- 7 - .
1. Proposed r cures to ensure the proposal is ci atible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any: ••
• err wvI?J . P it " • .
Fr(9 ems,• fo+m p4-/e-,x;o '10-1irft- 0/0-40.41,9.-)c. - +
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
::,.. •
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
_ Q •' p
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed.
34 17,4I f2 aPj O
V ,
(•
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
N
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
A 64. D2c6lu p Z9ln-4'21106S On He 1`•s6 Oes0
c p, , l... eSc,,-p1
!II. Light and Glare •;• .
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or
interfere with views?
lld
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Noy f41oWN
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
or..oci --r., IrtE �l'f - : '�7 u ti r i .S6
P Etc-ro )1 M-12'(C5-
•
- 8 -
12. Recreation
•
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
FLAvvfp i2Fre-viit-70dilt-e.- 5/72E: To
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including '
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
11JF0144 Ffer-f-A-710.3 frtAy 116614/PfP
131' C.W porpcolz., Luk-rdit-
Aaeis4 2 eteyez:ic1wit-t- CXO
-
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any pieces or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state.
or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
140
b. Generally describe any -landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
•
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
WeOg.
•
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
• eik•KSPA- Ao0.-
• a.1;m FP
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately
distance to the nearest transit stop?
POT- WOW/0
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
•
24-7 -t•
ti.A1441JA1W-- c9
- -- • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
•
sT - er-- 0 rpoi-deperea UV - fropcar( S14A-ic
PPIF-1-9PF-77
. .
- 9 -
• ,
•
e. . Will the pro use (or occur in the immediate uty of) water, rail,, or
air transportation? If so, generally describe.
( 'TV /4,4( 1 Pig• '' c¢�,t,�6
•laiR
•
f. .How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
ke7 l -AJ - A- 7 SPprr�gT Co avr -1� ✓rvro r/�1)2
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)?
If so, generally describe.
? 6(-y 1 4 RRL't c,E
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct ,impacts on public services,
if any. •
NNE,
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently a ilable at the sit electricity natural gas,
ate refuse servic epho antt ra y sew septic sys em, Mier
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility
providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or
in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Ar *N 1.6 s/r�.. Pr/o.�- s,51z.v,r. - r PAIS
• Awen. vCen,vk.w BY PUGSr
15/1 a0 '=
C. SIGNATURE v'EdZJIG S ca&rf2ro[.r sue' 77 ,.' G!1�
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is
true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any `.
declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist
should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on
my part.
Proponent:
Name Printed: got3grzr hL•
Y1S
__..
ft
•
c„r.
' t
1,5
• zi
•
4r,
- 10 -
IM11
11,1
#176 11-8-84 '4,
�'19 i11
1„1ETLA1JGA SToRA >✓ GALGUI- A1 l o1J) S
{- 2oP ' P 'DISTR►SSJTIat,J C.EiJ-recz
!�AILESD:=�c AvS • S AN,), F2,0,410
IZEtJTot,1
Da=Lr IPTot,J ;
Tom t S 11 11 Sk TT/ t S LO GATED �tJ T►-'-E =�ovTl-1- `9\ o=
A�s, 42,yJ, C 7. 143 rci. ST) AD7 A C.EtJT -ro co►-)-r4k
Qa1LRoAD SPQR FOR THE coyJTAI►JER GoRP• FAG►L.I'TY G\gLGI.�S
-T4ke, SITE FoRmit,go A Dt Wrr No .oUTLE'T FRot•A
L©�J . -r4s RAtL.RO,1D TRAGIL D J CL.EJ, I IS.Z.. A42
"i 1-1-S SITc L-ow E.LC\/, (S S,S , ITC; I F4T 714E 1 OTroM
SOD A 3 1,70,A ItJA&G si 4,) M STi..Y
JP-DVsLoPG0 ,110o25 BQJS1-I At--kD c sc k1L-tu-
'Po TtON • •6.0NstS--T►►Jcc, of MAtJvF-AcC r+.JRltJ'C:a AOt) gork-DIJAY4 ,
-1-61E FOL.Lo4Jt Ott) ov..)4 tJ ILA_ LAN01,J 114E , IT;v L)AL,
g.m, OFF dzwTtz I Q,.r-f Je€ �'� -f+-ls 1eJSTL.At.)V4z
DEJGL.OPMviT FoR A,. \oo \{SAR ► 24 -o'R DSSIre.�
emTo2v\, M4E 10 FLLT2A rI at.J RATS IS A SS•D ot) PERIN-tEAPtLL'N
RA-T e, Fo `rI iS -TYPE o scatL.
D IZ A 1 tslA S. aA‘10 AR,G•A, % o. ►4d.
A►R EA i t
SAIL Gt.A�SIFi -ATtou P 1...10x,r)tovtt.L. SILT La1�M
otL. J1DRot-oeotG. Rom '•
ItJFIL.'C2ATtvt.J 2ATc lc� %cc, % . 02?, IN/w.;�,
'PS Ski 1-1-4
Tt-tE >✓XISTt GorJTR Is,...)T►►.JCo To 71- S t,JETL ,A JDS
ARCA PiRI►J( A (Oo `/EA2 STORM l5 €7. cOG .-E 1�JITI-1 AN
Ft 1,.1 OJTFLO►,-) OF '1,21 G-4S AO fl A MAX IM - M
.JA-r R SJRPAGS AT ELE'. l p , 161 ' , T1-IE POST= 'DEJE L.OP'ED
j t�FVot:J 1,JtLL SS I4.S1 Glcs F1 ovTR..°i,.J
OF 4, O3 c.cs , TIaE PoST EJEL.0PEE1D a- TFl.Ol.J lS k-EICvI-DER -r -AL)
TI4G PRE - DCJ E LoP E O ok..J TFt_ol Die -To -rN E- LA R-C�E2 Sut2FAGF
AREA. cAu'Ei UY l-\E 1.4Lb --IE(L k -reR Po r-
DEVEL.oPED MAIM`JM IA.IATR A,S A gESvI_T OF
1- 02E IMPERVtovS SJRFA.C,E AtJD 'TIC F-1LI,1fr-�� OF- A Po¢TIo�)
of T►-IE WETLAtJD V.J ILL gE AT SI.EV, ID. Low' 02 0.4e7
44 I(n>..1-6 tz -j14 A N -RIG FRG -T,E V 6LoPS.D ,J P r ,
may. PLANNING DIVISION
#.?''-, CITY OF RENTON
y AV"�' BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. SEP 2 9 1989
/ r , CIVIL ENGINEERS& LAND SURVEYORS
•.rI SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 323-4144 . d� FiCE1VE®
O FOISTEat`��a`� 124e,o 1 SA I_ - 2 to - 8q
•
9/25/89 Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. page
BRUCE BLUME
WETLANDS STORAGE SUMMARY
3PM
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: IMP1 NAME: UPPER ORIGINAL BASIN
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA • 15.00 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION • 4.00 inches AREA. . : 15.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 80.00
TIME OF CONC • 66.53 min IMPERVIOUS AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 0.00 Acres
CN • 98.00
PEAK RATE: 4.64 cfs VOL: 2.56 Ac-ft TIME: 478 min
BASIN ID: IMP2 NAME: LOWER ORIGINAL BASIN
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA • 15.70 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION • 4.00 inches AREA. . : 15.70 Acres
TIME INTERVAL. . . . : 10.00 min CN • 95.00
TIME OF CONC • 42.22 min IMPERVIOUS AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 0.00 Acres
CN • 98.00
PEAK RATE: 11.12 cfs VOL: 4.48 Ac-ft TIME: 472 min
BASIN ID: TOTAL NAME: ORIGINAL TOTAL BASIN
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA • 30.70 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION • 4.00 inches AREA. . : 30.70 Acres
TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN • 80.00
TIME OF CONC • 98.75 min IMPERVIOUS AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 0.00 Acres
CN • 98.00
PEAK RATE: 8.10 cfs VOL: 5.24 Ac-ft TIME: 486 min
10
A
lEGEYJi
' VI
I 1 Hyd No, i_ :2f;.:�,,A t -T -4c�.'l ^�.1,�t —
V
I Hyd Nor 8 ,L.,L,,a„.. nr i�; „\ B;&s;--
r 1 Hyd No, 3 --- vPP°4 or;Gs,I " �a5 �
C i 1
1� 1
k
III' i t
lid I
X I .
1
[•l\
J y1t
i f 4 5
f 1 5
f 1 •1
•
/ 1 •5
f 1
ti5
r ...5�
�r
;
d lc•
•
ti
•
3 8 118 15 18 81 84 87
Time in Hours
Hyd No. : 1
Rate: 8.09 cfs Time: 8.17 hr
Vol : 5.24 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
Hyd No. : 2
Rate: 4.62 cfs Time: 8.00 hr
Vol : 2.56 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
Hyd No. : 3
Rate: 10.98 cfs Time: 7.83 hr
Vol : 4.48 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
,i. lEGEND .
1
.I, 1
Hyd No. i_ or., ,„.„‘ To+,o Sas;_
Hyd No. 4 sv,;fed Post - e.1eoped
( *P `
5
4
* 1
1
I 5
G
1pi 1
1 1
1 1
w
* 1
0 1 1
1 1
a 1 1
'1�M1 /
1.
1 1
rrAA
71 ,S
j ..
1 5
Ry \•
■� , -
!/ ...�
1. r 1
� �If 5
'1
• .1
3 .fi 9 i8 i5 £8 81 84 87
Time in Hours
Hyd No. : 1
Rate: 8.09 cfs Time: 8.17 hr
Vol : 5.24 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
Hyd No. : 4
Rate: 14.59 cfs Time: 8.00 hr
Vol : 7.04 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
•
IEGEND
+�t I Hyd Ho. 1 Prd- She qe loped L," i ow
N Hyd No. 4 post-L��elo,ped h ,.,•cloL
*IA
Hyd No. 11--- Pre - Degelo fed 1 0d---�'4-
t- d. 1.lo, 4 H ---
d No. 12
y Post-'C2v21 oPed 01/4J�'- low
'TTlll 5
I 5
11 ON
0
1
try 1 1
WI
t
i 1 ti I'u II 1 �, I 1n.
•
fr m u.�Ifl:,10u.../'n....... h'•'1��. IV D.
r'.
2r
12 18 i4 30 30 43
Tine in Hours
Hyd No. : 1
Rate: 8.09 cfs Time: 8.17 hr
Vol : 5.24 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
Hyd No. : 4
Rate: 14.59 cfs Time: 8.00 hr
Vol : 7.04 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
Hyd No. : 11
Rate: 3.29 cfs Time: 13.50 hr
Vol : 5.24 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
Hyd No. : 12
Rate: 4.03 cfs Time: 12.67 hr
Vol : 7.04 Ac-ft Int: 10.00 min
9/25/89 Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. page
BRUCE BLUME
WETLANDS STORAGE SUMMARY
3PM -
LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY
MATCH INFLOW ST DI <-PEAK-> STORAGE
DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) id id <-STAGE>, id VOL (cf)
PRE DEVELOPED 0.00 8.09 1 1 10.19 11 59788.42
POST DEVELOPED 0.00 14.59 2 2 10.67 12 95731.38
Ioo YR, — 2d- 1-4►2 . P6Si !J ;702.t. 't
�JF�o\,,1 = .oq crfs o JTFI.ovJ = -;.24'e-rs mA-X, I.J,S , = Ion 167
IDG ,G+Lot PGD
I0FLoW - t 4,7Q 4,o-; cet, ,- 1Q X , 1,4 r� ,= 1 0, b�
01FFEfze)JGE 4tJ MAX, 1..1,5 = 0,4400�
L�
•
•
124 123 122 121 120
49 J _ 4T__!a5_4 I __80 :1 ..1.i .6 .4. 55-,, ,. 5 . ..4. 4L r , 22 r:
5I
25 '.Ci V EL 7.
Itir---(7.1.4r1,..
�. L .14a ` � t C 1 440.0),,,
;05 ,/';8(3,c.
0 EGA �1 45 \' � t6 �41
FRIDAY HA1 n(n N i ��' C
I p 'PORT STANL Y •il � ,‘94.,-% j. c.... �1 6P 1 �r,.
' T.VE' r...4. I • .th1� r
2 I kik
e.tfce:s%teLi- a '-'30);-..
It\I
�. Or ^ 10 7 Alk.-11t5 .7..,1 1 1 ,.�. s E 20_
48 1, jam! 1 1\ ��1‘�� 1 It 1 el(�`�• II. ^ ,r( \�1 ... +t . , ,1•' •
75 , V RETT ? Z W}, 1 40 3 I \ .
,,,,...*:, . .
6s' Nd
11`" 3�
100. 544 r _ = 1-
i.r 1 1 5 =01 Afi �► : '80 r; l '5 0. 54., -.4) i 1101 � rf 5 �Pl' i-":41
� 40 s ��� 1 �� J� -
— ♦ `! SAT \� ^? rc
/ I ' i. i-) • 0110. • f
g 'IS _, .1; `.. .1 ' s v
\limo:0;5
16 5 � OMA 1 ' - - 1 h.
47 r',K. nf I = _ > '22
ABE�rE ,',
-ter fir`//. rililit,=.,...,Irfp-Ale,
trfo.
70 14, E TR•L_ p , :g�--f l•t 6$� . _ ■\ r.
,J •
.i
IllI fi:--N , `t-- - _ -3 „� i . ,-; '22 •X35K �9�1` 0`_00 � • 65- ;; f
61 3. 4. 1 1• 5+, 1ii \ 45 10 ;I / _ —� 22 ..\ •
•
' j, ,1 .1) ci..1 . :n-----(--'.../ cr-- N 1
65 :l_ • AD• e I r..Z5 '� 'ROSSEF
60 5 0 '1(. II ,. �1 i 6, 30. -7 .).. 5
...4)
40 ''1 =) 'I 50. ' .i 40 7'` _ r :tC L. ON'
Et A i....c,1 :-,' .. AA4O '
l �4 I / �`i��
•1 - 6' 0 bap4535 NOAA ATLAS 2,V:
•
Figure 30 65 �/ Prepared by U.S.Pc.
ISOPLUVIALS OF 100 YR 24-HR PRECIPIT TION 45 50 55 60 65 30 National
Weather S,
IN TENTHS OF AN INCH • Prepared for U.S.II:
Soil Conservation S..
124 123 122 121 120
I . . . . KING COUNTY, WA IINGTON, SURFACE WAT- DESIGN MA b
_ b. A 3:1 aspect ratio between the trap length and width of the trap Is desirable. Length is
defined as the average distance from the inlet to the outlet of the trap. This ratio is
Included in the computations for Figure 5.4.4C for the surface area at the Interface
between the settling zone and sediment storage volume.
c. Determine the bottom and top surface area of the sediment storage volume to be
provided (see Figure 5.4.4C) while not exceeding 1.5' In depth and 3:1 side slope from
the bottom of the trap. Note the trap bottom should be level.
d. Determine the total trap dimensions by adding an additional 2' of depth above the •
surface of the sediment storage volume, while not exceeding 3:1 side slopes, for the
required settling volume. (see Figure 5.4.4C)
II . TABLE 5.4.4A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS IN KING COUNTY
[ 1
SOIL SOIL
EROD- EROD-
HYDROLOGIC IBILITY HYDROLOGIC IBILITY
SOIL GROUP GROUP* FACTOR:lc SOIL GROUP GROUP* FACTOR;K'
I . Alderwood C 0.15 Orcas Peat D 0.00
Arents,Alderwood C 0.15 Orldia D 0.49
Arents, Everett B 0.17 Oval! C 0.17
Beausite C 0.15 Pilchuck C 0.10
Bellingham D 0.32 Puget D 0.28
Briscot D 0.32 Puyallup B 0.28
Buckley D 0.32 Ragnar B 0.32
Coastal Beaches Variable 0.05 Renton D 0.43
Earlmont Silt Loam D '0.37 Riverwash Variable -
Li
Edgewick C 0.32 Sala! C 0.37
Everett . A 0.17 Sammamish -. - - D 0.37
Indianola A 0.15 Seattle D 0.00
Kitsap C 0.32 Shacar D 0.00
Klaus C 0.17 Si Silt C 0.37
'' Mixed Alluvial Land Variable 0.10 Snohomish D 0.32
Neilton A 0.10 Sultan C 0.37
Newberg B 0.32 Tukwila D 0.00
Nooksack C 0.37 Urban Variable -
Norm. Sandy Loam D 0.24 Woodinville D 0.37
1 HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS .
A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high Infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted,and consisting
111 chiefly of deep,well-to-excessively drained sands or gravels. These soils have a high rate of water
transmission.
B. (Moderately low runoff potential). Soils having moderate Infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted,and
ii consisting chiefly of moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of
water transmission.
C. (Moderately high runoff potential). Soils having slow Infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted,and
Y consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water,or soils with moderately
It. fine to fine textures. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission.
D. (High runoff potential). Soils having very slow Infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting
chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a
11 hardpan or day layer at or near the surface,and shallow soils over nearly Impervious material. These soils
have a very slow rate of water transmission.
• From SCS,TR-55, Second Edition,June 1986, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made from SCS, Soils Interpretation
Record, Form #5, September 1988.
I , 5.4.4.1-3 2/89
r.„ .
CITY OF RENTON RECEIPT # N U3 16
DMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • f;,
PLANNING DIVISION Q
�''" ' GITY OF RENTON . ,. DATE G/�! 19 f
CITY TREASURER !(.4M c7���,/1 n , ;1,.. is
ii9-29 1589 '�/i v� / ��
9:14 am
;EG!RGF''1 i)r-1i1812 - . '
e€0ae,
:A SHIER ID: A -_= AMOUNT =
•
•
,i 00 MISCELLANEOUS REVE $1,12ij,i-ii) 4 ►_ DOLLARS
I1'E PLAN APPROVALT - .
0011,1i1-I,IjII0„00.00,0000
APPLICATION TYPE
/ / ,
r:{!111 MISCELLANEOUS REVE o
NVIRONMEN1'AL REVIEh17�i�`i}n TOTAL FEE
•
iiijii,>i{j,iiiiij,ijij,iiij,iiii>iii %345.81.00.00 Rezone
TOTAL DUE -__
$1,9ijii,ijil Conditional Use
C:EIVED FROM: Administrative Appeal
Short Plat
_MICE MUELLER & ASSOC.
•IECIEr_:!; PUD
$78G,iiii
1,120.00 • Plat
TOTAL 'TENDERED Final Plat •
1,�oii.iiij • . Plait fir V ' r�ao oc�
C:I'1ANGE DUE — so, 1/345.81.00.01 Variance & Other
"
�_ __ )/345.84.00.03 Annexation
)/345.81.00.00 Final Plat
)/345.84.00.00 EIS Fees /11� 8200,0
70.00
3/341..50.00.00 Sale of Maps/Publication •
0/341.60.00.24 Miscellaneous Copies
Subtotal !$B� 0� r
Cashe� •
000/231.70.00.00 Tax
Total 1 Crn•U(�
By: .g
;,.;,'_I,'� '`r' : ;'•� ..�f.. ':,,•:^r�' �a- :.i •}n:['i! tVll rd' r-•� -*.:r ., .<. ,� �•f
r. •;
,E.
a
,I
,"r
u•.
6'„
sd�'
:
1• r�t Ta �'
Uf
tN •• sa' •d
P• u
7.
1
' t,:' 3
•
,8` • •Jr. 4 �'h. I
ti
•a. n'd a
!
S
`i'
I'. y r�:
a, if' •r
h.. ti:
l
7'e 1.1
S
S.
.•t•
a•
p:.
.t,r
':r
r {
f.
i.�«N.
F
f'
;r:
r.
�p • ,r.
.t.
i.l i'VYr: ,
i,• •
Gi i'
11'•
�.rr,
ti:
'a•
�'1..
rl
� N•' . i
',t
+?�� • :if
1'.
az'.:
. ..,....... ,.:,..,,,,...,,......„.„,...„,„:,,,.:,,„:„..„.,..,: _..,..-..„,,...,„,„.... . . .
�ar
,i
.i Y
fie'
t,r j`iif::•f':
*.1
`f
1
r'{a �•�
1!.
�j�i.
} t
v
+•i �
•'I
4
1'
.'i
r r<:t`r•
'c 1:,
t r''
'Z
4'
�.t ,
Q'�' aV ::iir
i '.L -
a ..i.. • �yt,.
-t�'I'1'�, 1'.
il:
I
a
�1 }r
i,
•r^
Cv
.7
r'
.4
.t.:
:,n1'
r'
r'
'i5•' rf
7'.
0
Jr �ti.
'1r.
l -
.f `Ii.,
=Y
1 J•' 'i
.y .iJ 4....
$ {
:Y. Jt/
I
;1,
{ t•'
' y ''ri
,.....•• .- .
I
r:
�:c •r. �t t
r :1
iLc ..�.
r�
r�
r.l.•.
4• d
1 �r�, 1
1'1. 1.y .t,i i• ,•
�y•4: r S
' 'Jr^' 'Yf:
rY
••1•' err
1�:
1 �,1 1
{
f. �p�
.Y(
Ir ,rc
I ],v
:; i:,
't
r:
,. �iY 1 .
�1''r :�
.f'
i;l'i 3',
t • ,, v r 1tir.
d C•
'.• •• t i'
;j
• f: :r'
''1,� r 4 f :��r..
yi
•,! s
r� Y"
5'
•i.
E
r, t yy `S 1 f: ••
1 r' "
111 1t,w�•r �'1
A- 'I
i: �f
,r- ,(• • a•
r.%
'r� ` 1 ti
y {
p.
1'.
t
l 7
.je
•t
W J
tY
J✓rl,
i.11 L �j M •�Ei
•t! • 'Yi('
G
•'' R
'EL �,
%'•tie'
er~
'i}
Fx i�.
J
A • 'r 1 Fb.
•/ /, �d DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
� SEATTLE DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
, if H P.O. BOX C-3755
iM
`\ SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9 8 1 24-2255
\�V REPLY TO
SEP 91989
TATESAf� ATTENTION OF
Regulatory Branch
Mr. James Garrison
Bruce Blume and Company
1100 Eastlake Avenue East, #210
Seattle, Washington 98109
Reference: OYB-'1-012850
Garrison, Jim & Blume, Bruce
Dear Mr. Garrison:
You applied for the above referenced Department of the Army permit to
place fill material into less than one acre of isolated wetlands at Renton,
Washington. The purpose of the fill is to construct a distribution
warehouse facility for the Container Corporation.
Department of the Army regulations dated November 13, 1986, authorize
certain activities under nationwide permits. Paragraph 330.5(a)(26) of
these regulations authorizes discharges of dredged or fill material into
nontidal rivers, streams, and their lakes and impoundments, including
adjacent wetlands, that are located above the headwaters (where the average
annual flow is less than 5 e.f.s.). Similar discharges are also allowed
into other nontidal waters of the United States that are not part of a
surface tributary system to interstate waters or navigable waters of the
United States (i.e. , isolated waters). The discharge area must be less than
1 acre.
Based on the information you have provided and our onsite inspection of
the property with Shapiro & Associates, the proposed work is authorized by,
this nationwide permit. No individual Department of the Army permit will be
required, provided the enclosed nationwide permit conditions are met
(enclosure 1). Your application is returned herein (enclosure 2).
Wetlands are dynamic ecosystems and are highly subject to change as are
the federal regulations governing development. This jurisdictional
determination and nationwide permit authorization should be considered valid
for only 2 years.
Nothing in this letter shall be construed as excusing you from
compliance with other Federal, state, and local statutes, ordinawarafikISION
regulations which may pertain to this work. If you have any quesiMs RENTON
SEP 2 91989
RECEWEI.
concerning the requirements of' nationwide permits, please contact Mr. Jim
Green, telephone (206 764-3495.
• Sincerely,
•
Ziff-4i 0:4-
omas F. Mueller
Chief, Processing Section
- Enclosures _.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
NATIONWIDE PERMIT CONDITIONS
FOR SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF ACTIVITIES
For purposes of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 3, 1899, and
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the following special conditions must be
satisfied prior to any discharge of dredged or fill materials associated with
the activities performed under the authority of nationwide permits for specific
categories of discharges:
•
(1) That any discharge of dredged or fill material will not occur in the
proximity of a public water supply intake;
(2) That any discharge of dredged or fill material will not occur in areas
of concentrated shellfish production unless the discharge is directly related
to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized by a nationwide permit;
(3) That the activity will not jeopardize a threatened or endangered
species as identified under the Endangered Species Act, or destroy or adversely
modify the critical habitat of such species. In the case of Federal agencies,
it is the agencies' responsibility to comply with the requirements of the act;
(4) That the activity shall not significantly disrupt the movement of
those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody (unless the primary
purpose of the fill is to impound water);
(5) That any discharge of dredged or fill material shall consist of
suitable material free from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts;
(6) That any structure or fill authorized shall be properly maintained;
(7) That the activity shall not occur in a component of the National Wild
and Scenic River System nor in a "study river" designated by Congress for
possible. inclusion;
(8) That the activity shall not cause an unacceptable interference with
navigation;
(9) That, if the activity may adversely affect historic properties which
the National Park Service has listed on, or determined eligible for listing
on, the National Register of Historic Places, the permittee will notify the
District Engineer;
• (10) That the construction or operation of the activity will not impair
reserved tribal rights, including, but not limited to, reserved water rights
and treaty fishing and hunting rights;
• (11) That in certain states, an individual state water quality certifica-
tion must be obtained or waived;
(12) That in certain states, an individual state coastal zone management
consistency concurrence must be obtained or waived;
(13) That the activity will comply with regional conditions which may have
been added by the Division Engineer; and
(14) That the management practices •listed in Section 330.6 of this part
shall be followed to the maximum extent practicable.
In addition to the conditions specified above, the following management
practices should be followed, to the maximum extent practicable, in the dis-
charge of dredged or fill material under nationwide permits in order to mini-
mize the adverse effects of these discharges on the aquatic environment.
Failure to comply with these practices may be cause for the District Engineer
to recommend or the Division Engineer to take discretionary authority to
regulate the activity on an individual or regional basis:
(1) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United
States shall be avoided or minimized through the use of other practical
alternatives.
(2) Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons shall be avoided.
(3) Discharges shall not restrict or impede the movement of aquatic
species indigenous to the waters or the passage of normal or expected high
flows or cause the relocation of the water (unless the primary purpose of the
fill is to impound waters).
(4) If the discharge creates an impoundment of water, adverse impacts on
the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and/or the
restriction of its flow, shall be minimized.
(5) Discharge in wetlands areas shall be avoided.
(6) Heavy equipment working in wetlands shall be placed on mats.
(7) Discharges into breeding areas for migratory waterfowl shall be
avoided.
(8) All temporary fills shall be removed in their entirety. V
2
•
•
APPLICATION FOR DEP,.., ENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0702-0036
(33 CFR 325) Expires 30 June 1989
The Department of the Army permit program is authorized by Section 10 of the River and•Harbor Act of 1899,Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and Section 103 of the Marine,Protection,Research and Sanctuaries Act. These laws require permits authorizing
activities in or affecting navigable waters of the United States,the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States,
and the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Information provided on this form will be
used in evaluating the application for a permit. Information in this application is made a matter of public record through issuance of a
public notice. Disclosure of the information requested is voluntary;however,the data requested are necessary in order to communicate
withlthe applicant and to evaluate the permit application. If necessary information is not provided,the permit application cannot be
processed nor can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be
attached to-this application(see sample drawings and instructions)and be submitted to the District Engineer-having jurisdiction over
the location of the proposed activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned. I / IQRQ
1.APPLICATION NUMBER(To be assigned by Corps 3.NAME,ADDRESS,AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED AGENT
`(E . 4 -o 010
•
2.NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Telephone no.during business Noun
Mr. James Garrison
Bruce Clume and Company A/C( . ) (Residence)
11.00, Eastlake Ave. -E., #210 - . A/C( ) (Office) •
Seattle, WA 98109 Statement of Authorization: I hereby designate and authorize_ •
to act In my behalf as my
Telephone no.during business hours agent In the processing of this permit application end to furnish,upon request,
supplemental information in support of the application.
A/C'(- .) . . . . (Residence) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT - DATE •
-
Aie(206 ) 682-4200 (Office)
4.DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY ' '- -- •-- . • - -- ----•—• ---- . - • -
4e.ACTIVITY The proposed activity is to build a 226,000 sq. ft. distribution warehouse facility
on the northern portion of the ,41 acre site ( see attached site plan) located in
•
Renton, Washington (see attached.Wetland Delineation Report,-dated June 1989, for
site location map). - . -
•
412.PURPOSE
The purpose of the project is to supply storage, warehouse and parking facilities
• for the Container Corporation. •
•
•
•
44.DISCHARGE OF DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL
In order to construct the facility, less that 1 acre of isolated wetland
is proposed for filling.
•
5.r1.4.1ES ANO ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING 1PPERTY OWNERS,LESSEES.ETC.,WHOSE PRC ` TY ALSO ADJOINS THE WATERWAY
•
6.WATER BODY AND LOCATION ON WATERBODY WHERE ACTIVITY EXISTS OR IS PROPOSED
There are approximately 4.7 acres of apparently isolated wetlands on the site. The site is
East of and separated from the Green River_ by Fort Dent Park and the B.N. Railroad tracks.
The site is South of and separated from the Black River by 72nd Ave. S. and a spur of
B.N. Rialroad tracker SPP attached Wetland Delineation report by Shanirn dated June 19$9
7. LOCATION ON LAND WHERE ACTIVITY EXISTS OR IS PROPOSED
ADDRESS:
The site is bounded by South 143rd• St. (0aksdale Ave. S.W) to the North, 72nd Ave(Monster Rd
on the East and South and by the Burlington Northern Railroad to the West.
STREET,ROAD,ROUTE OR OTHER DESCRIPTIVE LOCATION . . - _ _• .
King WA _ _ — -- .
COUNTY - STATE ZIP CODE
City of Renton
LOCAL GOVERNING BODY WITH JURISDICTION OVER SITE
8.Is any portion of the activity for which authorization is sought now complete? ❑YES ❑NO
If answer Is"Yes"give reasons,month and year the activity was completed. Indicate the existing work on the drawings.. .
9.List all approvals or certifications and denials received from other federal,interstate,state or local agencies for any structures,construction,.- -- . - .
discharges or other activities described in this appliation. -
ISSUING AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL IDENTIFICATION NO. • DATE OF APPLICATION DATE OF APPROVAL DATE OF DENIAL
10.Application Is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in
this application,and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such Information Is true,complete,and accurate. I further certify that I possess the
authority to undertake the proposed activities or I am acting-as the duly authorized agent of the applicant.
•
7/12/89 • -
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant)or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in Block 3 has been filled out and signed. .
18 U.S.C.Section 1001 provides that: Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of The United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false fictitious or
fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years,or both.
Do not send a permit processing fee with this application. The appropriate fee will be assessed when a permit is issued.
•� l
•
` - - SPECIFICATIONS -
•HOUSING—Rugged, heavy -ge, lightweight -
aluminum housing. Rectilinear shape,internally
seam welded corners for weathertight integrity. p�WN114t'a DNISION
EPDM one-piece,continuous-gasketed,extruded CRY OF R ON
<' [I. , .
' aluminum door frame with impact-resistant _
C `" tempered glass lens. Extruded aluminum arm for 175/2501400 .•-'
pole or wall mounting.Standard dark bronze finish SEP 2 91989 1000II�1
with eleven optional architectural colors. ����® ;
•OPTICS—Unique one-piece hydroformed reflector. :.
METAL HALIDE
Multi faceted,segmental design with three-
dimensional parabolics for precise light control.
•BALLAST/ELECTRICAL SYSTEM—High power
factor ballast,factory tested for reliable operation. T� W
Electrical components are isloated from the optical L, �' ��
chamber to provide excellent heat control and long p -
ballast life. Removable power door for ease of 1 l
_ installation/replacement of electrical components on `/
medium and large housing. Positive locking ��
disconnect plug.
r •LISTING—U.L.listed suitable for wet locations.
DIMENSIONS-
EPA(Indudes Length Width Depth 15 to 50 Ft.Mounting :
HOUSING Mt.Arm) In-Cm In-Can In-Cm •
nsnsow. ,.an,,.,,m, 21-53.3 ,5�, ,v..,e.n • . Initial Lumens 14,000-110,000
1000W 3:on i.28e 24-61.00- 23n se i 151.26.7 Lamp Life 7,500 20,000 Hrs. ==
ORDERING INFORMATION -For MA dedect.S tl�,.OSm.Irum above values. •
The luminaire catalog number guide below illustrates the variations available and establishes the components to build a catalog - -
- number for ordering purposes.To use,select the wattage,mounting,voltage and options for your requirements,then transfer the
designations to the appropriate blocks.Accessories should be ordered as separate line items.
•
TYPE— I TAA I I I 1
WATTAGE OPTIONS •
• 1 WATTS WEIGHT DESIGNATION✓ SUFFIX DESCRIPTION -
•
lbs/kg —HS House Side Shield •
. -
175 19/8.6 175M ❑ — —SF Single Fuse(120,277V)
250 21/9.6 250M ❑ —DF Double Fuse(208,240,480)
400 31/14.1 400M ❑ —PER/PE NEMATwist-Lock PE(120,208,
1000 47/21.4 . 1000M ❑ -• 240V) +
• . • — —PER/PE7 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(277V) +
—PER/PE4 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(480V)+ .
MOUNTING • —PER NEMA Twist-Lock PE -
DESIGNATION✓ (Receptacle Only) •
—DMB Architectural Color,Medium Bronze .
(Square Pole) SP12 ID
(Round Pole) RP12 ❑ —DCS Architectural Color,Sand Stone
• (Wood Pole or Wall) . 'WW12 ❑ — AlCk loss)
. .: • —DCC Arch tectural Color,Capri(BI ei-G
- ' . Optional Mounting T —DCA •- Architectural Color,Aztec Tan••"`` - .
VOLTAGE
• . (Mast Arm)' MA ❑ = DESIGNATION✓ _DCX Architectural Color,Garnet :,' _
• (Degree Arm Pole) DA12P 0 120 ❑ —DCZ Architectural Color,Citation Gold
(Degree Arm Wood Pole or Wall) DA12W ❑ 208 0 —DCW : Architectural Color,White(Semi-Gloss) .
. 'Not available 175 and 250W units. - - 277 0 e —DCG • ' Architectural Color,Gray - • - -
. ACCESSORIES - •. . 480 ❑ . —DCO Architectural Color,Ocher
Tenon Mounting Slipfitter is ordered as separate line '. . —DCN Architectural Color,Natural Aluminum .
item.Important with this accessory,an RP12 or optional + Includes Receptacle and Photocontrol.Photocontrol
DA12P mounting arm must be ordered on the fixtures. • - shipped as separate item and must be field installed.
Tenon 1 2 2 3 3 4 -
NOTE:For more details,see options and accessories sheet C-O/A
. Size fixture fixtures fixtures fixtures fixtures fixtures • For color reference,see color guide sheet DC.
at 180° . at 90° at 120° at 90° at 90° -,
23"O.D. T2-190 T2-280 T2-290 T2-320 T2-390 T2-490 • . -
27/e"O.D. T3-190 T3-280 T3-290 T3-320 T3-390 T3-490 - .
! 4" O.D. T4-190 T4-280 T4-290 T4-320 T4-390 T4-490 ,• •
' NOTE:For more details,see options and accessories sheet C-O/A. •
..c,._!..,...�. .... .. ,..:,.r-:.,1.:�:.g;..• ..ii�-u�... .,�_'�,•',i::;, ....�w.� ..h. .::a,. .,. -sue,,... ....
.�•'-__ _- ....� ,. , a.s, v.cis5ra-��y�=,.;�s.;. 'k;�.a•' .. ;;ri>«. ..:.:#.sue_:
JOB NUMBER ' - APPROVAL STAMP
" ;z 1 JOB NAME
LOCATION - f�i�ic l 1.1G:.- ,& I •
LIG�TI NG
2/85
HI--TEf► . TAA M
„ 1::
SPECIFICATIONS __ 7�;,
• HOUSING—Rear housing i ;ged,lightweight,r
r19 68cm
. .
. . :
: , , , ,
corrosion-resistant,die-cask diuminum.Stainless steel I �`
external hardware includes slotted and tamper proof
fasteners.
7 • OPTICS—Reflector is white painted aluminum.Mogul 17 5 Y
'?` socket is standard.Front housing and reflector are I
t �� .,..
METAL HALIDE
one piece,injection molded,UV-stabilized poly- I
, carbonate.Dark bronze finish is standard.Medium
bronze or black finish is optional.Refractor is sealed
and gasketed to inhibit the entrance of outside
contaminants.
• BALLAST—High power constant wattage,
autotransformer. 161/e”
• 17 , ‘6,,i,
• INSTALLATION—Backwire access on a 3"or 4"outleti—rm.
h40.sscm—
box.Top wire access through 3/a"conduit entrance. -
Feed-thru wiring can be achieved by using a condulet
tee.Mounts on any flat surface. 15r/,6" - ��.
`: • LISTING—U.L.listed suitable for wet locations. 39.21cm
A'. I .
L____
., 8 to 25 Ft.Mounting
Initial Lumens 14,000
Lamp Life 7,500 Hrs.
ORDERING INFORMATION '
The luminaire catalog number guide below illustrates the variations available and establishes the components to build a catalog number for
. . ordering purposes.To use,select the voltage and options for your requirements,then transfer the designations to the appropriate blocks.Accessories should be ordered as separate line items.• .
TYPE— C1 I TWP 175 MP I I I I
WATTAGE ' OPTIONS .
: WEIGHT DESIGNATION✓ SUFFIX DESCRIPTION
lbs/kg
15.6/7.08 175 MP ❑ —SF Single Fuse(120,277 volts) •
—DF Double Fuse(208,240,480 volts)
•
:s =' —TB Tapped ballast(120,208,240,&
� 277 volts)
\ � —PE Photoelectric control(120,208,
NOTE: Standard socket is for universal burning AlIMI 240,&277 volts)
and position oriented lamps. —ORS Quartz Restrike System
—EC Emergency Circuit .
—DMB Architectural Color,Medium Bronze
—DCB Architectural Color,Black
(Semi-Gloss) ' ,
VOLTAGE NOTE:For more details• ,see options and accessories sheet A-0/A.
• l' ACCESSORIES(order as separate item) DESIGNATION✓
• , 1 "'CATALOG DESCRIPTION ~ 120 .❑
: - .NUMBER 208 ❑
•
'I TWPWG • Wire Guard " 240 0
NOTE:For more details,see options and accessories 277 ❑
sheet A-0/A. 480 El
•
JOB NUMBER APPROVAL STAMP
JOB NAME
�SS
LOCATION 17: Ir AC I. MOil ICI 1 EP .
t.: l;,.:,i.,.. .c,.;� -„ - a.1, .e ... . . _ ,,:4r a,....m_,- 1_ i �'L-s ,-,fir.`•` c.:..
11%Y L�IGH T i SIG
``. LITHON/A fi .:.r, .
HI-TEK 2/85
TWP M
-- -.13K UCE . . GUILE Ret rr- o' J
-
CdICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 1700 1 _` (;�)C1
SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98104
KATHY VON BARGEN A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT Our No." '161591c�r,r
FAX 206-623-7463 SCHEDULE A Your No. •
PHONE 206-628-5610
Effective Date: June 26, 1989 at 8:00 A.M.
1. Policy to be issued:
ALTA Owner's Policy Amount: $1, 400, 000. 00
1987 Premium: ' $2 , 850. 00
Standard COMMERCIAL RATE Tax: $230. 85
•
$3 , 080. 85
Proposed Insured:
BRUCE BLUME and ANNE STEVER BLUME, HUSBAND AND WIFE
2 . The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered
by this commitment is:
A Fee Simple
3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested
in:
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR IN
INTEREST TO CONCORA CORPORATION,' A DELAWARE CORPORATION
4. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the County of
King, State of Washington, and is described as follows:
SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE)
PLANNWG DIVISION
C►py OF RENTON
SEP 2 9 1989 •
RECEIVE
PAGE 1
A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT
SCHEDULE A -
(Continued)
Our No. 161593
Your No.
•
' ;"uA!
: ;
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24 AND THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RGE 4MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED ASEAST FOLLOWSLLAMETTE
i
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 24;
THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 03'30" WEST, 2, 622. 11 FEET TO THE UART
i BETWEEN SECTION 13 AND 24, IN SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; Q ER CORNER
THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 34'43" WEST, 1,137. 00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE
SOUTHWEST) AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;KNOWN AS MONSTER ROAD
THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 1, 740. 00
FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE
BELT LINE RIGHT OF WAY; NORTHERN PACIFIC
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY AND ALONG
EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF LAND CONVEYED TO CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PR
THE
RAILWAY COMPANY (NOW CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY) FOR ITS REVISED WYE LINE, 2,475.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE
SOUTH BANK OF BLACK RIVER, SAID SECTION 13;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH BANK, 85.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO T
SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID COUNTY ROAD NO. ,8; HE
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY •
GIN OF
FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;SAID ROAD, 1, 450. 00
(BEING ALL THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1, 5 AND 6, SECTION 24,
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF. SAID SECTION 24, AND
GOVERNMENT LOTS 5 AND 6•, IN SECTION 13, AND 'OF THE BED OF LAKE SHOWN ON
.GOVERNMENT PLAT, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE
THE RIGHT OF WAY OF NORTHERN PACIFIC�RAILWAYBETWEEN COMPANYCOUN ANDTCHICAGO, • 8
AND
MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY) ;
EXCEPT PORTION THEREOF, IF ANY, WITHIN THE BED AND SHORES OF THE BLACK
RIVER AS THEY WERE SITUATED WHEN SAID RIVER CEASED TO BE A
STREAM; NAVIGABLE
EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: WASHINGTON,
COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24, WHIC
SOUTH 87 DEGREES 29'26" EAST, 1, 156. 77 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST HWEST CORNER
THENCE SOUTH 2 DEGREES 30'34" WEST, 916.42 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 53' DEGREES 42'00"
.
WESTERLY MARGIN OF MONSTER ROAD;EAST, 445 FEET, , MORE OR LESS, TO THE
j PAGE 2
A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT
SCHEDULE A
•�' (Continued)
� ,r. Our No. 161593
Your No.
THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN SOUTH 18 DEGREES 34 '04"WEST, 31. 37
FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE FROM WHICH THE RADIAL CENTER BEARS NORTH 71
DEGREES 25'56" WEST, 256.48 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHWEST, 128.92 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 47 DEGREES 22'04" WEST, 121.88 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE
FROM WHICH THE RADIAL CENTER BEARS SOUTH 42 DEGREES 37'56" EAST, 250. 37
FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
SOUTHEAST, 91. 01 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID MARGIN NORTH 48 DEGREES 15'01" WEST, 420. 00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 8 DEGREES 59'17" EAST, 125. 00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 46 DEGREES 14'18" EAST, 219.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF
' BEGINNING; ALSO
EXCEPT A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13 , TOWNSHIP
23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13 ;
THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 51' WEST, 114 .7 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66 DEGREES 21' EAST, 153.9 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 66 DEGREES 57' EAST, TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF
THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND -PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OF
WAY AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO,
MILWUAKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY, 108 FEET,
MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF TRACT 33 , RENTON
SHORELANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENT, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF TRACT 33, 33 FEET, MORE
OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8 (KNOWN AS MONSTER
ROAD SOUTHWEST) ;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, 104
FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 74 DEGREES 13'19" EAST,
FROM A POINT WITHIN SAID TRACT OF LAND WHICH IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERLY
MARGIN OF A PERMANENT EASEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7202010402
AND GRANTED TO KING COUNTY FOR THE P-1 DRAINAGE CHANNEL, SAID POINT BEING
DESCRIBED BY WASHINGTON STATE LAMBERT GRID .COORDINATES (NORTH ZONE) N
176, 376.52, E 1, 650, 378.61;
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD
NO. 8, ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 300 FEET, THE CENTER
OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 25 DEGREES 21'49" EAST, AN ARC DISTANCE. OF 50.74
FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 74 DEGREES 13'19" WEST, 68.84 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 83 DEGREES 41'02" WEST, 60.83 FEET;
THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 667.96 FEET THE
CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 15 DEGREES 46'41" WEST, AN ARC DISTANCE OF
108.45 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE,
ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 24 FEET, MORE OR LESS,
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND
EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR OAKESDALE
AVENUE SOUTHWEST BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8706091481,
PAGE 3
♦
A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT
z_- SCHEDULE A
(Continued)
Our No. 161593
r.! ; ..
r, A . .�,� Your No.
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13;
• THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 26'40" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF 1, 271.76
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 175. 69 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE CHARLES MONSTER
1 COUNTY ROAD AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 46'34" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 32 . 29 FEET;
THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET AND ALONG
SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 101•.39 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 13'51" WEST 60. 36 FEET;
11 THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE. LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 842.73 FEET, A DISTANCE
OF 81.56 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 70 DEGREES 46'34" WEST 143.37 FEET;
THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 532 .96 FEET A DISTANCE
OF 197.20 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 01'26" WEST 42.55 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREE 58'34" WEST 10. 00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF
SAID CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD;
THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 01'20" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 42 . 55 FEET;
THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 542.96 FEET AND ALONG
SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 200.90 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 46'34" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 153 . 83 FEET
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED MONSTEWROAD AS WOULD ATTACH BY
OPERATION OF LAW VACATED UNDER CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 4123,
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8803070674.
•
•
•
•
PAGE 4
•
CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNE ATE PLAN
u'
CITY OF DIVISION Ran:
IN
2 9 198'9
* * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * ECE1V
ED
PROJECT TITLE:
•
APPLICANT:
APPLICATION NUMBER:
The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the
pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City
Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to
site plan approval.
ASSESSOR'S
NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER
7 ;, d— . 6 D l wt - -ur' CLIC 5.V' . .. 2 4.Z 4 - goo 5
-1 zl. -• Z 4•230 4 q o 8
94,61AL) WA Li,idol
YvA • q8/0I-
' ASSESSOR'S
NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER
•
CERTIFICATION
I gt&te • %'j :reby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their
a0 asses were'taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a
Notary,Public. in and for the State of Washington
residing-- at SE .,(A_ on
••-- the \I "` day of e J.2 .
+ dc\., L , CA SIGNED:
CERTIFICATION OF MAILING
I. . hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site
plan approval were mailed on . to each listed adjacent property owner as
prescribed by law.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a •
Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington
residing at on
the day of . • •
SIGNED:
•
•
FORM 208
•
. •
' ' ' ' •••• 1.'1.4"••• . ••••••••,, .•;••• -,t, ••••,'.':1,t.-.;i'•••'•,',,•,?;'',.',•,i',,' ,‘„';',•:.?-::'.''•'1...,; , . ;•I'•:•,,...:tf,,
• , • •
,,,..; . . .,,..1.,,.„,0,.,i....:......... .:;..,i‘,..,,,,, _,,.,..,,.;,.....,:.; ...,,,•.,:..'.:,-',.fA'',,3',';!:.!•?,•.3'.1,.::.,i,.tr..;t:.;:I;•.:'..Zi ?''i;'`';'.,.'i-i•.!•!.e';.;i.i'•.:l•,'•Ik•1•:',•i,(.•,•.';:r,2y.,•..,:•1,1 P.%-'.:k"'...7.,,;,...4,',,••:X,;•1 1.,,-' -',';..•?
I',..:?1,i•.,'2;.'1r.).•...'.‘.'1.'•'.,.,';.'•..;--',,.',;'.:'•,)'-:'•,','.'i'.:.V.'•'•74 3i:...•i..:';'...:,.l, Nt..,'fii:"',.,P. .;`•.•',''•..:.'.•;.....;J,''.'4,t'.)q.:,..;...',.,...'....0,'.....';;r.':•,;'-,,'':..$'''••.','-....•.•...•.=.'.','....',''..3.•',,,,."',•'Ai-`,ii•i,-'';..t,'.,:'•...1•'•...,.-...•'..;1'Z',,i•.,.,..:t,;.:•...,:.•,•-!,,,I."i,ti.,Z:,.',.,y..t;g#?,4'#.'sl,tt,,6,....,.•4?.,,,:.4.,.i,0,''•.•:•,•`4•.,,i4,',?,i:,A,.•A'i cl,,:b-,',-.•,.....-,.,,.V.'.;...,'.ly,11•(4g..toi).itv•g.^y‘i,.:t.[z,r:.r4i,!A!,3,ii•i;;5-.:ri„.e•Mtt,t,,cr4V1.•:;i.••,.;',.,1;...1t,Vr1:.,.1k*1,i,l.•t,,li.,i:.f'"...•.;•i..•.:•..'..,.'.-.4•,";;.'',•'.:•;,'i)I,e 4I:•.P'4:2.•Y:4•,.t;.;1::17ri?f.:::',;.:•,./•1:i,•‘;•':•,;••:•••••,-'••.:.:•'Vi'1,;',t?I1,X11''".,;:.4 7:;,?,'•,:t..5;),':i,s‘!'t••'i•,frceV;'‘l.•:!,;..•;'..fr6;••,A:r'„•'•V,'7'i•i;k'u.r-•es 41,•i,'•1.'4':114(41,F.-r11•l(f.i•I•••:ig;''0 7:.mN•t i`••:'iI','?.;.•.:I••.,.,••,.'•',';'.k)2,':.v,%l.1r,..,:'4'•'..;•.'.',•;"•:',,'i,•;;.•',fYI4;'.,•1V1't44-;.4 1,,:7i.:.....'!f.•,l.',-••,,.,'."•'.-.,".4.1,"'1!,i,';''P'-,1•',':'k-F•;•,...-'i,:,•i:,V%,.;i.,...•,,.f'.,j,,:';,,.i:t;,.,.'•':s;,-':..."•i.•t1i•.',.'.,.•:..1:.'':.,1,..'t...).•21•ij.•,,:'';,-::!•';,',).,,t;;•.^;17:':•:."•.'..6;;:..',tf-t'-.,.i..''7.,•3:Y.,'•1,;,.,"g:q1'e':4Y':.t.':.;':.::::t.
•
'‘••;',.,. : :::'-'....',',': '.,•,i',i,i,1•••',5.$1-'4:,'iqt''' igeli::!1:1,t,,L.';':.F.i.':..,'.'",':',:4,:.i..:'..:•;::. ,,t, g.,:l.tiii-.1ti.1/4N,,4!4,,,,)1,$!.;:4-:.•.,, -');,.•,.i,Li ',]:..,-.,../.1-.•';',,!•!&,,
i
,:;!4'r••:A,!:'....-:-.'k'i:.,....,,„-- i...,, ,,:,...,,,.,..;!.. .;.:',45-.,,-).-V•1...lik.P.f4.,.'i:l.t.,ii-jr;'..,;,',..,:•••'.•.',:•`',, iL.;',,-....,./;,:....A..)9.:11,-',..k.i... 4';:p.,"...44,;,_,.4,;.k.1,;...z'PM:',...-4 ••,'•••••';',',..:,:qfif):::::•-•;!•';'•?I'qic),k4'.if,IPi.,.'5„„94ii:.,,,:'1,0,,'I i.;1'..,.....lii.%?,...,?•!,i.-;.',.':,',':;•
x.','•.:,•:•.':;:`,.-•-:-..'- i•••••!-.'," 41.1.-4..,,,',,,,v.• •-•,r:,.?i?,',1,..i. ,.::,'„),),.',...'.1i..,..i.i'•-•;,,i,' ,-.".;.':',•..,,,•;:. it';',,At..C..',M,',3",,,.4.Nt .:,'4'41v6:4:4g.'.1;'.....'•''''F.,,I.••••••,':',..T'1/4 ;1;,.,'',1.'.'•Ii4.44.iiP,,•fi..,,,,..t?gi'.,:qiNr't.1-4::.:i1.?-q-:1,'...:s•-1:iIti.'...
..1,.4„;1•.../,`.•:.;..-;:•A.:-::'•.',...,.•:•.';...•.C.,•-,-,,,,,,,....i.:_•,• ..,....;.1„....,...„:,i,„1,f'.i,„Vi..••,..f'..i......v;.,../:•,•,,,.,,,,,.,j1,,,,,c.:.f.;.;!,...;., , ,.A......1....,..;,,,i,,t,,,,t..:,..c....:4,,,..v.,6,..,.74,144,1,7s.,..1$,:,...,..si,t)1.,,t,,„...v.,..t; i.,......:,•,•,......,,v.,.,,:,..;;;;../..,&,‘,..;ii,;.,,,,.1..„141-.•,;Tft„,. _.,,,..,,,,.... ,...,.,.:,,..i,•,,.,0„...:,•:,,,i;. ,i ?!../..;;;',;,‘•;,A,,,,;.,r4,-,......4,,,;
..,.,,,„,,,,.,,,...,1.,..,,,,,, .,,,,,:. .., ....„.,,,i,;,..,,.,......,,,,4,,,,, :,,..,.,•,.;,,,....)...,,.„.:,vc ..• -.... .: t;•,•.;•r3•,), ••••••?Att.r„1,-,..c.,,,i.),til lit•-,,..14.rilt,,::,.1.4.'•• 1,:)'I,..•',,..6.',?..?.•-•'•!••,.,:cANmkrr%.,'•oiir d4'-1-19'04;:'''vi''••1.1, '`•;;••'''i'''''•''';•••••''''•*••
4.4/..!,,...,,.,',..:....i.t;:,.,, ;,•0•,....-...........?.,,,,••....•...:•:.,vci',..,.....•......,..,:.;1..•;,•:..,,!:k.•,..p.::..•'.....', ! ,,';'.1m..,•,,:"./..•?,F7:7 ,::'?.,;,....fck:tV;)......', 3.',..'•14./A,',A:/',.'' c•-k••:‘•,•'V.1'CY,'iv.:;F•;.'$'61.P;P-4 te,'')5j,°`7!:t)'•;k*'.55t....Z.i,"'.viz.:''.1.,‘;''',..,'',''..?,;i1,1?-,'•':•••
1 v
;;";•''':';:'C.!44''''1'•?1's.V.!.li'•',l';',;•':t'.. •;;;.!.'ii.-1'.c,:•9i,,i..i.j•':,......,•,i;i,C,';'-'0'.'!r,f,i'i!::;:',;•.i, ,`.,'' :, ',' ....:(1.L?;,y:',Ii.,.14tti:•;:l',4:?1!•::..: pillariikli'Pli,01/1!i 1.',:';;t:':•.;'lli!';,";!:v1.1'.::!-'i;,1:94-j/4,0:11,., ',Viii,,(.1.:0,,,i-.1..',.:.IQ. ,•Tr,;•, .4..?..;.;•-ii•;s!...i.:,w,.......1::.:g•-..;•
•,:i,i;,i..is,-.:.;'...-.;:-.1,•1.,'..f:',..-,1-1 ii,:.,f,,...,i•„....V7j.i';'.;.•,'",:?•:,s?-:•!!,:...':;.•i•.V•iir•e•••,•lc..1!4.,k•.:,;••,....",•1,',••.! •,,,' ;;;,!;4•';',/•:,?i,i?, 4;415.w.•-t't,-1,',„#„ iil',1no"Aitr'' '"''''' ' '1•1,'•'.1,/,:,'Ir'4.)(494i,';.•''•,i'Wg..v,,•'.'41,1i, ,:4,;,'•1•••;•,i•r.:i) -;44.-%it, .., i•-,,•4•0:,,-;;;,,..,•';':k,",-.:•;•;.
•,',",:::,,,,re•ii5...:•i','.!•:.•'••:•.!';?(••'',:',..;,•1,'',.'•••4'..c,.;:••,L'.,:`.i;;,":"•?.'t",'(';).•!..1.:,'V,;i:'i,nr;.:-;•*'''i:J'•"'••''';'''' ' ......'''' . ''. '1.'-'' ,...1 dG.Q., : '..r."-•i I .•'. ,ti;?••'''''}•'•••:"!0%V;;:•;;t4',1,-k`111.' '''•,1-1*..,'Pf.v:i-ii.'•,3`i,•.-, .-i !',••,1:1,..,.,"11-.::/.'''I
.',..,':;''.1.?',',' •,.:f;'f,',':,Po),-,...,,I.y...),',,+.!,,;!,..,','„,r4,„,;„5:fi,‘.,,,i,,.:;,,.....;. ' • '
4k• • i• •)•;%••••••Y•f!i-tvi,,,•;•••1 it.riVo.4 • •,,ft-,- ...1..iS v l•',•:tli t s•''V.:(1.:','v•......,',/
'',-Ii•ri..4.•)•,,,,,•••';ofii%',c,..i.,. 'L4.:,..;•',...:.ir,;:•;,.........:...p.,,,,,.;.,, 1..., - •• • ••,, '....4.,•,...-,..,..•‘....t. •,-,-., 1, :•• :•• 1.....4,,•';1 i•,:o.v...a. ••r,,,.• ,•-:. ,-•••.••;•••
. ,*-4 :P•P .•'''•''.i I • •r•A.'0•:;e:K‘41%-.•'•'''41kitY;r101(11 ..c,'''4.•:,,,,iVi::,•Qitk.:'Di4,4,':-•';:i'•-?....':'.:*1,:•••',-.f...
7•••• ••41••••.,k•lj„' ,,,•:,;,....i..'..:'•%•t:.'.2.-1'..-••••,,444.•,•1
-6:'•' '•'^ ' • -.2..fr; ,•!•1,.P.."-i.,,... :01,:•e(11,41;•",41115'.t!:;:'410.`r,10,";.•7'," 1,10-‘;': '•"..ic.;
'....1';';',':`,,t';'''...f.i'i'l;'','-'.e, r(''','1 •.:i..•.i..;i:-. •3:'.h':c?'.i ''I
!,,E`.:!,,,,,,j;,!:L'•;..,k4,.?.;.: ,c 1,,,,:!...,',..,').!;,i'.',.t.,,V),,:,:,c:..,±,,,.;./,..,•.,. .......;•,.
,,,,,..,,•, ,.•••••.,4 4,.....,. . ..,:.r.,, .,,...,•L,.. . ;.,,..,..,..., . 1..
•••'''''''''"'''''''4''''"''gr'A 43'•''-'''°"•4-'L.. 'h4..'' ' ...'1 D1JP I..I C:A sl E R EC:E I F'T BOP L I C:A T.E_REC E I P T -,•:!,--4 .'i•.1' i; .: :.1.,3::,:. . t...,.,:.•7...iy,;14'.!?,0‘ . ..?!.1%..:;...:::'.. %.:::::!!i.;i4.
••'",•,•.'"7.' •',i,',;•''' •• ;',;',' ,.....;,:::•,'.::••,0::.;:.'`..•,
.1k1:.':•:•.1.,N1...'.:.,7..1'.!,'•.7.:.,".'•:'';',1::: ciTY OF RENTON • ••••:i.,',',,t,•,,.Cf1•••••••••,,•••••!• 4;1'...,,',1;•4(tr, ..4.M3'.',),-;•-.•:,',.,4,..1';% ;....%.;!Li.•,:.,?:•;,...-,r.,.....;,
:',-..;.,,,,,,' •-.'.....,, -,,..t•.!,`1,41••••,-•••,1'•':.•:,''''.%,!i!':•',''.';':-....1,';.•:N•il ••••'' .• ; '.,••••,):,Ii'..;.''!'.0';•:•...'.:•1:-. .,';••,15',,'•1141'',!.',01',V;•,,').;••';:,„;.k;.•1,2A..'i;:igi';'•';';67:::4: .'••,.f•••'.1•;:•:.'•?.'•'--.:'
-•,,...,,,,;;,-,•.•-•;•-,v7,.,/,-,.,?•,.,.,,•,.i .., ,i,,..!,,;•••.;•, ,,,,,,,,,ii.„•;.. 't
CITY TREASURER •;•,••;,:.,'..!;,.,:fi.....%„•-•!.;1.::•:,.:„,“••,,)•Y,:V.:•;';',1,1„:4,,t7;-,•.',.. "'„'.,..4,4.!),--•''.'ivi,'.,:;:.t'','..•;"!!.....:::;•:''''•..•.'•.;•!'
••'••••‘"•-(,','. --0: ••‘, .!:•-,.... ..,•,,, • ,,,,...,• ....
'4',....... ,.,. ...,
--,•i'••,; •-• ••••-,o• ,.,•',.• .1.'1,, ,-,....•••g 1,: ..!, , c • . -0^e. I.1...14,/,..,•::::,c(a 1..4..;;i•r.:•.=•:-.'•••"1
•:.1,-,••••••••',.'.::i'...t''•'1 1,!:.••':••,•-..,i. '.•-..,'.,,:,,.."..r, '.,1F.'. f:••.,'',..-:.• . .`:.2,', '•'•'.!,;.,,.r. '';'
: 12411989
1.0:09
..•,,•,.•'.....,:,;';.'.'.•.'.•'.'.;...-;;?.,?..7;.,,''••,,.'',.......'.....'".',.;;,;;1;;;,;,4:,•,•?.t7;.;‘.'?4...`,:::,'',:,t,P‘il;•f',';.::;.;1.,-.-.'.')41'\..•;.,,''.,Y.'i':1;'1!.).`':!.;'..-.•..'...•.••:i.Nf ..'.:.11',':::-'',•!•,'..,.,`.,•;''•!',..;:.:•:..-::•••'.,'..'-'',','...••••.,:';.''•!'.•..l'
.:.. ';•....:'.•;"I?."%.,'..,,,•.'')...,.''.:i;iy,':.:....',.:-.%.;,!!.•,'. `'4Z,i 7 t,7••%5 V. '.. , ,'.:
'.'.,!;•:!:•...,!.,....1:!1:;...ir::.!,,,. .......,„',..,..:r• ,,! t'.',,r,. '.. „.:,; RE.t.i./Rer.,,i- • .,,, 12-03785 •
••-== AMOUNT' :="•'-'. . .I: •`.1t!..,• ",.;,-.; ,••.•';•,••[t il;:4-•••• •Ali.-• •••:••.r.•:',f'•,';;'• '•'.'' .1-1•:',:. •••'',•• - • "';'•c•
''•••••?•V''‘i..:.; 1•.•;-1.-.."Sf. ;.,1...,1.,.4-7.:- ..; 'c's.,.:.-.. '';'....1°'•''''..•..•-'1 c:A Sli I F R ID: G
$675.00 '•`•• ", •• ••.-.,'••‘;•••"-,•!:,,-l',1:•••,".t,ii:'•:,-',:,...,•..r,:',••.; .,•;-;;;•• -;:, -.,•,..•., ...,• ,,,,
',••• •IN i,'• '.:1E1:1,4.;•'44...':i:'•'•:. ..,f;'•' ' . ;',,...;';•',',• :' n 1•1ISCFLI_ANEOUS REVE
: '-:.•:••••';',:-.;:•.;•.;••„ .::•;'.,, .:••..'•i•.f_V. •••.,.....,;;•;;....• •::-..N,•.q• :,' :.-,.• ••••. .:
! '••''‘,'''il.c. ',•,••.....i..•••••••.",."':'-„•:-•,,;4-;,',',1:i.:,...)•-•.;,-. .:'f,'',,r•14 •.:.• ; .-
,•:••,''''',:.'•;,.. ., ',.••'.I.,?‘'41,1%,.,..',4:.1" ••:1•:,-''.:‘:*':''' :.;,•'''•'...,''', .• '.1. •F i 1.11 AND GRADE_ , __ min.) .
-..r.',..;.•••,:.,,...,. L-k,....• .,..,),.... •• ..,...,.,,, ,.. _ . . non nc,...34,.-,,,,,.,10..H.J.....____ ___ . ,...,..-,....:,::.,.. -••;••;,,,,,,.:...,,,.:-...,.,..?,-N ,-;...,•,.,••:- ; :,,:•':,..i ::.-'.•••, ..i,•
••••••••,r.•••••.,-1-:..•• •••4??.,..t•,...• ••.•,•t.,,•,.-•• . '....,•:•:•:).• ..
$675.0) .. .•,,...‘•,.'.,;- ••-•,../..,-,. ,• ,., ;.. .;...:.•, •: ,- 1.,1 .•:. •• • • •
:•••••••• •'';'i• ••.• '';'•'-:•'':')•••4';`••'•'' •';'''.1:•••••• ..,••••4•,,. • :,.
/
1.0.1.61_ DUE •••'''A'?•••`-'••••'-,•••";•,'•;••i'..•:;••••••••.:if.l"•:,•;'•••••••:,..-'•,::, ..,....• :4;, :...• •.... . -.
. ..., •,•„;;;-,...•••.,,i..• '..;‘;:,,•,"•••)-„!...,!„•,;;,•,-,-,,....,;:',;•.•:...,., ••,:,.,1,(r."..:
-•••••.•,',,'''...;, . ,,,•-,•'.'....,"•'.••::.:Ncy,';'••..:••,..,•-,•:, ,,.•,,q; .1 .•- ; ,-••
• ,,..„.,,i,•„,,,,,,,.....:fl.liii•r, •..:;.,..1.,..,:,7....; •.;,„••.;rp : ,.;;.- . : .•••••..
'::.:,,',..•;,..ti,i,..,'•...,.,:;•,;;,,..,;,,,,. •4'..,,..,!-..;.,.'..,•,,,... •:!!;;,',..;,..". .'....,,,V.;(.?,•:;',..•••.',.....,,...,1 , RiF:(1EildEVEDilua1ErIR:
: ':,!`.",-:• ;,•;., ,•,',."0,:::,;•,,1•.•••.:A., .-.......L":',....i•,;•,••,.c. •..•..y. . . ..-.
•.,;,:,...,,:•.,..i;,..,.!., - ::.",..!... ..1...,.•';?.,:-...........;.;,,;.',•,,.•,,•,...•.....;:e„,:•,:.•;::•?_,...." ..1'...,;':
$675•1)0 .. "•;•',••••••,-.....," .' 'c. .•,;!.i„•,.;;1,,i",•.t,,.., ••,-.;•,,.,,,, .•,...;,,,.,.•,,, ..,,••.•. , ,
ASSOCS
;'''.'..'";;;'.!••,. ....":,.'.•,.:::': 4;',Nc,4i,'-c.",:•,-,-::.••••',"•;•:,;•,', ;"....1.•:',,,l',.',',•;;.:,,•'1•;;'p:''''.!i CHEC:K
,.•,..,.:.•, -1...iV',,..-CVO)..'.• ' ,t1.4 4 07 t '•-•• •• •
e 00 . " '••,• ::,''s;;•;.' 1.,',..:,'',‘,.',.'li•7,1‘01,..j.Y.{!.7.:ii.; "... ''',. N :',•'•''• ".. e...
''.."..41,..t..' -.'....i.‘,`' Aji.,...', .,: '..,•• . :.4,:..P.,;t ;''II'. TOTAL TENDERED _ 1;;•••••:'!..,..:'',.,:':i:- ...'''•-::`:;ti,,•;‘,.''.;,4:5?.:'.','':..1,..;','.ii\:•.'-.•••••?•• •12 'i:1;.••::.•',•; ':'.:','•
'•••••••i',••••,1..",,1.:',i.•••:';:•``.'.;:•P':.••••• ' ',:••:•:.'''. •',1:1,,,t,r.,•••..!.."'.!
• $1).00 !• ••••••••‘..,;•t ::••!,'•.'''':-,..:-:,.''...,,•i'„,,i,ii••••.- •-•--•:• !?:',,',•:-:-...,•.',....,,i ',71,•,•,.;•!.,• ..•..,,.
;;;'''',.•••.'",:f-',;•.;::',..;'•,:T ....,.1 . :• •••.'!•;••'; ;;.:," ••',1"•'.. ::::'‘1, ClIANGE DUE , ,..,,.. ,•..•:•:,,.,. ,.:;•-::•";,.2. ,..,;•,:r,••1. ":"..:1'....".,'',. f:•';,, ,; '••`• ' •
"•;••,',0C,;'••:,•' ••;!::,:‘. 1• 41.•'•:.'•.'"• ' .:'..' '2' 245.1;,•::;•• ••‘...j.,`,',
• ' •••-,•::;,`-'•••; ‘ I••11...,:•:.'9;,;:i•.'.P,..,,'::.:'..!•;',1•",,..";•••,;••.::.' '.,•„'1,,•• .,•,'••••: . • • .:,•!
ii:4''•'''''!..',..'ei[''''`•:';'1•.!j;''.• ..t.,:••••••'•,.• •:;:•::.,'...,• •,•'•'.;,'•;--...• ..,''..`,•;!'), .:r.'.,••• :;•..?•,:.'.1•''.'••••i•.`.,;:•••:,;:' '' : ..:1: !!.\7' ': '., 5,Y-i,`',..•••'?'•':•'k'':;;;.-1,;J•,..
,'...‘i;.•,:i•,'.• .. •?,-..,...!: •,,,Ii•„,2:4,:.:?..;'',,••• :,...,•,4.••', •,,';;••;,1'.!.,'!•?;••..,•',..':•:, i = ..,-,...-.
,.y..;.•,:•,:.t.i.•:.,.‘ •....,•;,,I,),•):•k2.-..r';,;.•:'-.,•••••'•. ,•.1%§11,,, ,i'.'...c'-',,,;',,`•,'.':..,
:;,.'4,`;.t.';'''•;:1,/, l'''1.4,''• . :".!".'' ' •''''? 1.'"''...':''''•..1 DUF.LICATE RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECE,IPT.
r;i1'''.if;•••;,,y,.-.:.....•••••,..:;,,,..-•:!••,i` L•1?,k,,Ii•'.••• 1,•;!..!•• :•1.• ;.•'•'•• .g;•••..", .. • '.'1,',..1741:;,:;;;;•,',,,,'..,,,..!,...,-....;',.1.,.'•--yil.:•••;:•',',•:•;••••:',',•••:'':F,..;1.-ii •••,- ,• ' '••••
' - - •,"•••••••••-••••x;• -,•,::•v;1"1•••,•,n,,...,.,,••• ,,...,.,,..;,-• ,.4, •••,....,•••..;•,-,•.!..?. ;
.:,•,,..7•0 ,',..••,,•:1,. ...tkyi. ,,,•:,•...1.,•,';,,•,,•••••,,•,'•:;; 2,:,,c-,' ,;.,1.:.,•.;',:: ,-.....-',, '
..-4.' •••••,:::::" ;-•,,•',.:.,-!.. -4,...,•:,;•.:•:,,,i,..1.,;., L'..,i•u:',.,,...,•.„'',,,••',,•.
:,,;••;1•,...:',,,i.'! ••!•••••,'",., 1•1,4''',' ,.;,••?••,"•••:E".•:-... ',..-1;.;1,•1;; •!!::• • '• ,T..„,,••': • (.,,;,•?,•,..1.•:•,,'?)'••;),.,44,i.,-..".,,..',':',..,...f ....•::::-k,.'4F' •:,`,... '•...1 -:..,':;;:..
I;•,'':''i c3.‘''.,'•!'' '',..:.'.".....ii i:•,'c 0.I:.L.,• ,:'..y at •,.: . .. ...
':::"•;;•,'.;.c.•:•••..:fi'..•:•i.•.:. 5,*••••...1•'..L:.•:••!......1•.•,‘ ,. ::: .'ji.',(:.1;.• :Ai.7.2'1. . .
r',..••:::::•'',1''. ...!:..,“.4......! .1. 4.) •....•'".••If•'''•5: •:.:r•'.:1;:'• .•,. ':.•.. •••,'.'.•1 '
'..V.1::' -,1•..;..' .• ••,•:'• ;•4....,.W'i;...:•:.........‘;',..T.•, ...:;;‘i???14...1..?.' .•?•i:t'i
• 1•'•.'.1%,1.1.4.)t.••'1.•••11,1'..':1;.?••%rLV.i..',',;:..j.!.'....',1;:!.•,.••ii...'.1. qi.V.....:..".'f . , .•.,:
J•'• : 1-.'s. .i::,...:.22.„.•,q':.!• ' • ,,,11.,,:',..•:%•.tc..;...;,!!,• :: ..,:......1,';?,,...•!:;e::.111,4'..''!2"1:.:;:';,:i;'..',•,:•;';!4,''' : 't.S...':(., -• . .:''
,••1.',.''''.,0. ../..'.1.-, '24''.., 'r tt;,'r.i'''. •',..1:1.'I• '! Z..
.411,"f:,...,b .. ..t.,' •...i......: .,.1:(1;•!j ••••'' :...'i'''''.'. '....1,Z.j •,: ‘..,•••..•• :
'.1'.1.i.:•.... •,. .,,i ,.,, .1?..:.,,. . :.,,..,.... ....4:,.,_s. ...„,,„,,,,, . .:•••••‘) .:.:.t,r'.,-.,,'...,:fe,:t:1:.:..'''...'/:!.......1: S1.:•' ',i,:"..; • ' .• ' '' •• ..
'; . ' •q. ••13 t 1 ,,,,.,;I:'....,! .!;:l':...r!),... .,.:...4..,?.,...• ',.,es::!,:,:',1',..:,'...,i::' ..,...tilf, .•••,,...,;;,,,•,.....•.:4,,,,,,,i.;,•••,-,:il.,..,.,.,%.::xti.•.•;,,•?6,:','.(' ',;,0,.:.,i',.....•,:i',.,q.••;;' ,•;•••.'''',',.1.;...,..•;,?.$'4''''..2.•;'.::'•;,:•"••:....`!..t:". -, f•,..'.;, • . •••
•r••;!..4j.c.•...;,it.1;',... i,,'',j.,J,,......, :.,. :.,c.,.... '),,,,•,•.•,:•:...f.,.),...,.'li.•,:::,...,`.;,•;.•,$•..; .i;•••:."1(1`5414,, ..,...,-,.!, ,i.,,,,..!'ii...'.i'd•;,.,,,-/-•••••`.,;'N iQlt‘.1 •‘,.‘',4 "IA 1 ij :',.'•'::• ,"... •,.,•• • ‘• • ••-•'• Yl••:';•; •s• •`,": .1
r•••,....0.4,,..;-;...,,..,,./!.. tr4.,,,i.,;•. • .t:,;.,,,I,;t•,,,,,,,•,,,. ,.„,;!;,,,1. .4.,...,...,..„,..; .•1:,......., .‘;,,,,,,„....,,,*„,,,..,,.,,.i,,,,i..„:1,,,,..,,,.. ,,,,,....4.,ii ?,.,,,. ..,', ''.':'r•;=1'.1!..'..'•:','"'••• •••;''-:'•!...:•.:.::'..-1.1.t.''..c.'r:t;17.,'([1. • ' ...:'.:.:
'.;.-%"•;...'1''''.:":,:t•••''''; ...d `:-....1'.'`T.:-3•••'•••••,''''''•V•'..'••(41''',....'.."!'..•;•,''4•'''''"••,.- •'`.'. '.1-• l'•"N.l''i'-''':•l'i''::;/' '•,]?.....'1'-'.‘•'::,'-;•'•'4,i1'r:-„' 1., '`"•i '':,.,p'•i:f.;',1,•":•,,...,t '4 .. '-.` ' ' .•
:,:::tr'',. ..'','.'i..' (it:I!..','''..:';',t:',. "."',1••'••61L',••••.• 1•'.i'' ''N?•;'''t',';':: .;.4'VI 1.', ''''?••',',..'••••••"•)'.,'••':.• .';',,',...''..'•;'4?-i'•i•'•: ',-..".:1 ipi,),•.:..••,• ‘;'.,. ,..1';..s.,,,,,.,,A'',j'..?;:'-`4,..i.,:if.-•'!',.';"•;,-.:`• .,*.ri ....--
,..;,;(...:1.;'‘.,.;Z,;•s•it,••:•'ioz..,',', ;,. :,:,,,I,!.•i,,t..4..,1"..,t., •:'...1.;:,:,..•i't......i....A:t,•.....:'.,::','•t -...,.',•,...i.".• ',.. ........,,..,,i,....:,.',.I.•?.,'....,/).,......1://),•,.1%,,k;, ci,;.,..,,i,.,,.:;,.,-;,.,.:;. 1,,...i.v. ...i.: .....:i,...7...i.•:."'1....:;''f-'-i"... ' ,,r•Y1,:''' ..• '• '•
i'.:.::(..1:si','..''....:'4:::1'r.1:1 ;c;_''''":"'.'1?!;.,.....!:::'•'•:1:,W1::.•..:''', :.:It:L .q‘i.;\i'!..'1....:!•,..,!;1910'C'Li.'. i1 ‘.i';`,1..q: .:;,;;•1',tA,4$;.::•?.. .4. ' . T.';'::!V...r..i.: i' ,;:;:•: : '1...;::;1;
/
;,.:;.. ...f:,...,.......•••••r,..);,..,, ,!z...,;:...1•,,......;i!ifL:.4,. .•...[;.,•,..i...).,:i7.I.:;.....V),V.i:•.-:.:,;:!!!,:y1,,,,•, .0, ;3.,,r...11iis;4.,.',••..;;•-•1..':......,,`'IV: ';'';;;•!.!';''. .,,?...',.;,:;,•{:•[11;!.. ‘?...1.,:;;;;;,:••••,!,.):'-':!:,!'..T.',,,...,:..., ..-• .::,..,;,' .
I
',....-:,-,;,i. ...,,,,:,...!:,......4,• .:..;;;•,..,,,..s.,,,,,:,..;••',..i.:,•0.....::::::'..,,:.',.,..,..;',:i,'.. .',-,...,''',,,,:..' , ,t•i,:ii,,.....,....-,•.i,,,•,...,;,,.'Itii:.:::i.,.:14:`,1;4.i.A.A;k:,,.,•••,;;•.:•,yi•,),, .:•., •;!.,4,i.m.., ,..i.,....,.,..; ;•:cii.',..,',7'r-e,44.': ,..11.1.4,, : :1:y....t,v,•••., .:..,..:',..
NI,,..:„',,,...,,,,;...,1•!.• 1 .;.•:••••,:•,••:•..,',. .e,,.•1,',,..t.,,•/. .'•.•:.1)•,...,:,,:; •,,,.,..,,,,;.,. ,,......,,,).• ,i l• 4....',.-......;.•41.,...--......,,,,',41.P.'•.,:v ...!•,i,;•/,-...-•.'.131,,,-i',1,'•.,..,', ..i) i`,:•\,...• :.4.-A1:•• •••:;'•?i.. ......'!,..4N-1' ..1,-'•;. 41.'...1,'''.'.''',...•-',..'',•'
;.•,,...... .,,, -.„••,.,... ., ,•,,,,r,iv i,,,I.,,,::•.,,...L...,41,4...,•,..,,..,•LT,„,,•,,••;;,,, :,,..c,;,-,,•:.1 ,,..•,...,!.,..i•4,,q.,....1,1..,'‘!:,:•4y,i1',..,"..,‘•••,..;-•;',•:•'1,1"•'.;.::: )"??.;•;•,•;:•••.''fvfl4r-,c',: It',.,.;:.'•,.t'•9'•'•••••':‘,"••t:',,..';:.`1".•;1',I,•• 'i•'!'.- ir,•1.:.tyl';,i-.',:."k;', it.5V:.:-..,..• ,..r..",•!.4•
'-'1`,3.;•• ,1•.' /,•:'4'1 ,'..'lk.':.•:•!',....2if ';''itif,•.:,'••:•";',.'..:i•`.c.'..!;.1!..i:•.'•••••.".•;•,'';'•..,i';‘'4',',.1,::/•:.•4••'.:,•-t-,1,...:,•;''"•••;;I:•..i'I.:,!;',•;1•,i'.(1:' ' ‘...,'Of•ir"..•;t:'.,•?4•1;;,':.•f;'...i;•;;.•?'•••••..,•';:i4;;;1•'..,t;;;',P,11'...,',•:•i;st;kb,''f:Iv::% •';'.s',•:. i '•'••••'' C.S.':
`,‘3:,,,..'!'",,:'; .•''';',',..i "i '••;;,:;'''..•• •••i!V-•''''.'•:l'•Y:;;-:•••;:i.;•'•'1'•tr:".:•,'T t•''..!1‘•'';,''•;.'i"..f i..',••; ''," •)...'4'.r:s•;;,',1'1,11',:ir'e 4 •1,f.c etii•q.e:;,11'• ..-, ." Q..,k",'.itG,:t..:k:•:: .‘;.'7,.!,,•,',I,1 P,..Y,1:11;!..',•':';(...,"!ti i'..,;,'..P,T.,, f,'it.:;",:••••:: .•7',••:,!,:. •
1,...'1';;i'-' :1.,Y'..,','• .,'',. ''',;:.4 •••;1;4•L:'.:''.."'l'A;!.i ••:1,Y':.'.'i''1'1.1.'-...' i!''.....'''•'::-•'.i.".4.47,',•'. ';-,...'.c••••,....:i'l.Y •,:: ••,''4'..T.i5rtt;'•?.:::'.ilo.ri:'-• '.{.'•• • .1';'••-':'..;;;•-'?"'"':,',.11'',•••••';•:k' ."1'•'.6.r'•','''''o'2 : '-'-:.:''.," '.' . ','••';i •
1
I
yi A...,pt!.:.,:.,..,,,•.:..f ,,.;+, -.,_,-,L.:,.,:.,.;.1•••,..,,,,...):1•••:•••,...,,'••.•••,K;,:•,.;:•..:?,,,..,..;:.,.;i;„ :•.,..:1•.c. 'IS, ..;•••;V•.. •:•,.',..'.';•;•:',•*i:;::).,.....1.7 .„,"-0.1!,.',,:2,= ?:1C,.`,.t 'z)1P•:,'''r!...:%•••1,•`...'„;1:1!•-il...441:', 146:::::,•••';••;•,..'4•';:'.•;•!::,;•e,i,k,:i >;i'•:::'.]:-7...'.....:.'''."
!,1i5`;:.••0.,'•,.'.-"1‘T.• , V,;:.., • '...,. .,..2.e4 1•••.,-••'7•.•'••1....••• !'•..• • -.-...•....r',. ' , -kv,•'•:.,',.•.":, •;,•:',•`,•,. ....,.,:•e.,.,-,i..,-.,fr,,,• . ,..,f•:'• .1;1 ; ',l'•;.).;-.1 .., (..t.r.,.‘;‘,'.',•:'•'"..i-..'"I, ,5 -1."' •'.."'igi:
...r.i`;',,!,,... ...,';'.1'.'I.' It ,.•I...'„.... ,./... . .,,,.....),.. :.,,',,,,.:,..1. ,,,,,,.t i,..,i n e,...1,,,,-,.,,.,i.,,,,g,!...,..).•,,,.;f,..,,,,,•,,,..•.,,t ri,...;;;,.,..c..,3 „,.. •t...A.,••:,...•,„•,...,,,•1..„• •4'‘.....,,,,,,,,,!,;,•7-,..",,-,/,',.....!,:,•.,.',arar,•,,!,:,-,,•!•.......: ....:,...,,,• .
;.••••:•'=%,;•,..':•••,.,':-, ,., ‘,...'.:,,....:,!. ',.g.. .. .i.i.).••••••••••;;.::'-'...,:.:.•!',..7; .•::::::,-... .'•'.•:''..i.r.,:,(••',.?•••••••ft:K.,);-','•!4::':::••,...4:,. .,...to•;•.•.t.?',,,1),••• ) I.: :•' '?,i, e',.rFY ",..! icr ';,..i:• 4. ,....... L.,,:.•,:.-,.......:.,,,.,....
;.. ;,,,,„••:,,,..,••;,,,,-;... :,.,,., ,,,7.,,•:,,:.!••1,4 .;•;•;1 ,,..•;,,;0•,•,•••,,,,,:if.,..,...,.:%:,,,;:;-:.! ..,,,..;4,.•tiik...,•,,,,t,,,,,..,...q.v ' •;:;-•i-t:.1•0•1••i‘,:.1%;•••:?;;V:•11.1!i'4e-,,,,,*.f.,;:!:•15,4;e:',•;•,;•.:.'i..,,,:,. ....,S.,•?,1•4!;.).1,);•k;;;•;:l'i,L ‘..!,•,,,,,,, •-;„`•4•.ri(,, .4.,,,...,,:,...1.1.,:.:,.‘_.
-il.i7i....,. . ..:_,,,,,•,..,,,,.,,.:,•:..,..i:,:).n....1,,,i,•,-,,,...-„,, ,.,,,t-. :,,,,,24.,;,...._:.*A. :.::...:i. cf, .,_,I;iv.,.:,,,:.iki..,,,.1_,;-._...,, Ici,),,-,,,,,,Q.,,fi,N....:!,,,..-t:47..v.. ,,?•,..o .c,,....,•.,:.•,-,1.1,...i.s.:,.....,.1:1, ;,, .,..,,.,,,I.,:,.....,..,,..,,.,,,:•
,i...,..,...,;1,„.:...,,,.!.:.,.,,.:7„..•; :,... ..s.::,:•.-....-.-.•,.../.,„:„....,,.......F7,..,..:.,,,......,i,,.....:v.,i,,,,,,,..1_,..F..,;..„,...,.,,t,,ii4,4„.„•,.•,c,•?..y......:1:.•?4,:i:A•c„.,•fro, „.,,,,...,...,,,,,,•.,c...,,i,,..i,„,:...,,t,t..,v,,,,,,,,,,,:..,,:s;F: ,.:&,•i:•..,:„,.,........,.,..c.4..:.....:fx...i,.,„(lif„..c,.!../..,.,..•:;1_;41,:,,,...i...;::..t.,. i,:,••,,., „,ii, 1,..,-.,!.:.....i.:-.;,:,...... .
,.. --,-,'....??;'...,,..',.',•:,:i.i.....il,,,-x.,,...;:,.,....,,..;-,-...:...,A.'!?1,:-,..:-...».p.- r.......'.....,;:i.,...,....,',,L....':;.,','.% ...f.'i•.;:;.,:.•,;.`.)•1.,.;;;,.;•-r,..,,,`.,,..f,...: (,:;,,:...,-?,Y;Ii,,,..).i4,1...i:L;,-.. .,,,„..,,t,t,, ,,t,k-,-.,.,,,..4p. -, ,;,,!....:.,...,:::,....:sci'ri:.?..-:',';!.. .:::;... .....'i..il'ivi.,'- ',..`.!„.•i);;;:''..;.:':i"-i iif`it';',.:'''5,•';. .:':::•:•';'• .
;;!;1,,?,,;1'.../••••••.%•';'N•"•„•,1,-.-f,•';'•::,;:::„..... -,,,'.,....,-.c'•,•...,••",•I'.•'./ •••,:;',-„,',..,•••,.";,:.•':s';':•, ••,',•.,!i•-./,,i;.;;!i•.!',.,',•,,f,',....ic.41;k:V.,',.,•ri'is.;"4,4-:i..qt;;'i).;•.!:.',.?:4.,'''/t'');?:t)';':',v...1,....'L•• ••:,'.,...5::,;-',,.::.;',.;!....i*.F;A),',i'1,4..,y•:;3S.,••,!;;1,,3.1.,:',...)...;::;!{,:. ,,i ''.:-,:."...,''L.''‘'.;'-;:•.
/ t
q-,j..,......d.f.,...•,..,.,;'AI,..,••-.,&••••!,•••(•,,,•;-,':...;.;:;,-..; i'.i"%;••,•?:s'•••• ''''2,,i.'.•,',•.,..•:,7,',,•,'. i‘',;•••• •';7.••ry''. i.'.i•,;',N'c',..",;•.^A:r::),,k;••••',-,4,;,,,:i3,,,..tx•tF,,,,,,,K,.4..A.L5 F,,,...1.•,..,,,3,..-..:.,,:••,!-,,.,•-•,',,...,my,-,..,,,,,, ,,,',1,‘,...,•,:,: •.;;40,v,•.:1?,, ,1-..,. 1‘.,,z,1.',',.,•,..!..•.,•:,--,,i..
.1..,;':','!..i......,a.•-,.,..,A 'i;,„.........y......-.. .• ):.•A ‘..'..•-•.•,,..;•pisr•.:Y.,'L.1:....,!P.,'.:.1f.',".`:,5.1.7•••••••.-"i I/i''.1.1 i',4.`„';', :•;."'',%.'',•,',1:it.'',)!:!-••',•':';,••1•..`%•:;0?,011,t'A'•,,•4:rict;,;'•:,cc:::'.,',4'4'..;.,(t..t...iv,,,i,i,1,,,.1:...„i-, ,,;„,,i,%.,,..„Ilc,,,..„....,,.,,,,,e,Tet7 ,.,,..y,,, •,•... ,•,.
';;,?1•:.;....", .'... ':;-,?:-', ;••••• . ••,',.!•;'.:'•".• !j!•:•;,:•;-!•••.if:':':• !.`,.., •:; !•1,;:••••••••••';;;':' ,+I'0,';.'):(,;•,:'..!,••:?;,--','''V'?'••!•,).;•.;i:iJ.i•',i ; .3,;', --•,iN',i,i11,k,i,;: ti,k•• •••;,'•';riJ•!•I'',..'Jz‘.••;'!;',••5'..''•;i'.'.$4i:;•'.••11;,-.:.','..,.."••-.!4•;•:, :;1-', ''-'••••%.',..'/';';:••;-:•••',.
''',':c••5;f•;••:,•."::f•!'.'' ,.• `•••;.::•,'.:•:. •'-'1-.'•',:•,• . .: .1.-,5,1.•',:.0 i,.••-•. ,,;'•I,0';'.;:;','')"!4'1'....: .1: 1•••-•7:•.-.)1I.•-I'F'''.'•,:l.,,;•!':;..q•licklr ri,..,i1.0,•(., ',.i;:,:e,ll. .pi.;*,•,,',.,:',.•:.:,`;:,••••.;'4;.?.•••,11, .,,,Itrrit,/,-.:11:.1.,! ;-;,• •2.i.•`;‘,, •,...':.•-,%:--
:-•,:.•f!;i;•..',.....,:,•;14...,::; .•.,•.•i••;.. . 4:4,',,....':,-t,,,!,1.•,;•:,'•,;,'...•,j.,,.1.1',,,.:..••;;..•it,•,i,..,..,',I i.:, ' t.F`f"....;:iq c'i••••i,..,f ..i'..;.,‘fi,,g.,14.'r•ritl,:.•i... 1:1*,•:•.j.;i,•:.',..•,!;.1,!(•;(,1t,i-i.'.•',,',"; '.•;i".0..:'•:/•-•Y-f,""i..,".•,;1•!-...•:-::?:•:',:•:•-11-•••;t•• -,-•-•'•••:,:•.;;:.••••••••••••;•i•
....‘.••••,?,•:,1•,:,;,‘.•.4,•-•..;.,•;••:•'. r„,.1,''•+ • ,•:k4f.'1,.''..;;`c.f.;'..:. -, .• '-„:,••;;2.:•:..:::,••':/:' -.,„4 .':H.,.., .:A.,'.'......°-'4'.:1.5.)17','(.;11.. V,•11.;,;ttf..4.4.i4; :;..,:il .f: i?V41,1,.:;• 4;?..!-;;-;••••':'.1...i.
)
•.'''',1,.f‘t r.....',1:... ..',1.:.'.,...-,,'','t i)3 1;,''t.':414':::;:./:.i'Vii.,'':": ')......1'.........i.,.':',13:.: ':.4.1' ?; .- ,.$,-:•.:,f•.11... ,.•e.''4. 1);•••-:,-%64•-• .`0.3.;'..c!;•-•L';:•a`t.? "-II',•••I ..1iv."';Y..."1,''''''';''.1'.-t/'3.:'!'?4:'i'L'''''''':''''''''.' :'''';',1 f''i '‘..:':: r'''.• ''4' •
;1::-..."'i.;•...“' 'i'.6. 1.::..,..:.",...,.i.,:4:'.;,! ;'.1..,.:1';,',.-•;.•:,.',..,r... I.',I:;:!". ' ;..I:' :1 :;...i scl'.:.;1!.'';raj' .V;.,'f.',0,-!'?L'L.,7'..,,,)4,.'. ..;;I'..:N5j+7,3`1,..i.` ;•-.;,'':' ',,,...,',?,..'...1.2! ...'"3-:,..K.r.0„.',r...,...',/I!Le?:,.,:•,,.V,ii,12-.0.; tk.-.I,..'..,:•11.-. ., .
,:.;.. ilf.',..'::',:,',;6.'1,iir'1.....?,. 1..:.,,,,r;;. .:.•:..:•..;;-•:vjl,r1`..,.....",/:i..,•:. •.i...5 y'f..,.i,•::.:'...'..(t i'•,' .-,.'-iA,-,-::::,•:V‘?..,'.1.i..;'.':-',::;'•:•1'.• ,I.j'il.1..t Z;1;10,;.:-41i'iitl,,ti L'i-:•!'•.•••r'...'9••:.- ..c',".';';•:.C"1....t."t:;•'••••S:31h)P1':'•',-.':":,,,i':?:1!"...:I:-:f..,5 ',::;'.', •,:: •:'•
'.:',.?"/:::.'7,',.,,.:.:,.i.'•./.,,X?- •:'•.,••.,:.,...;"•:q.`i'-;'',',.:5)..';....•'...i.-'•'','•!;'..,-....P:.,:;'!:....:::::"....., L.-•i : ',.'.!. ..,'..,.,..1',If .k7, ,A1.. ,.,,•0,f'...,. 'y .....,4•!;v...,....-,:. ,;v.„,.:.',.. .1.,;..,,r4I.,•,- ;•:.'..ti.;:,•,:... .,.*),,... --...',;,•-: ;,.:.,'...c:
• ,s,,.....;;), .,.•.f,',.. ,....i!„J. ..:...:::::;.•,;.`,s: ::.: .........V.4.1......:: :.-..,...i:....:1.,... , .!...,,.',...i,.,:;..••;i.:...,,..:•., ,..).:.•y,i.,::.,•, ',7= ..r.,'•,•••';;.`4; ,i.,.i)...4,,...s.;(.;',;,.,1'/!...,..,'',•.•••:-...,.:1,,,:•;i';...„4.,i4..!.'',IX:', •!...!;,......',,,....,c....1;.ccr'15 ''f,,s.,:, ":....".':;:•:•••
f 1 I
''' '..'''. I.•'• '''.:t' 'i'4•'•J f; 11:1'.••'•P••.(P- •••tt•y r • •:L!.•••:I.%•,'!,i),i"i.1•0:::., .••....t.....1••,••• !,. .!‘..k.„.e v ti?,• 4'.•....I.., „,,, .,,..,.., ..,;•,,i•••,•,...,,...,,,s r,,•:,,,,,,7,,.),,1,.•• .0V.,. q ,......;.....: ,.•, ..., .
!. 4..••.,•i,,.•',..i1.11...:.,;..,.......,:l....•....,,..1').!,•,..t'.i..;!......,.,,..V•-•',....:.,•. ',. e., ,•,?t;;.%•.....iylifo,tv...7...?;:i:Ii.',,,,:i:;;!.,4'''',,a•oliAi4.:.!•:';'[.:;;..'.ii-;-',!•:-Sr?,,i,.1., •:'.1;:;.((-A)::':r.r:':%,:t''',.....,'''r`%.',1.!.::1•;'':iif, ?:' !:,';f•••=•:•';?;:-.‘7,':''..;
'• `.'7.•!'iir'.'':''',..r:'..,' '!..11';',..• .r.',.. :14 ru!.i.....'.7 f.''%''!;+,?.'..*''',"•'c'1*i •••‘',...;;i',?;,.•':.'...`,!,.i.i . :'',f,y.',,'.•:).',•ix'`.4.iv:1:,V,:,...,!r,:,;..,:•.4,t:f.:;.-,P;',:.',...1.1414,11,,',.,... ,:,',4,:v'.;,:;!::•:i,,,}•,',(),:',,...:).'s'il.,:,,••:.,-;'-',,.,41,IP.,,'...-:':.(?..:',',,j,:', !?‹. *,;'.;: ...'.......-4!„.,;',:•,.,.•
' -,'1,,' ...1 !;• ' ..1.'''"'.I.•`,...4'.(;'• •I'•l'....i.'. .11: '•‘••••,:•••`''•••ri'"',....:'r. . '1.....14.C‘'•V il 0.1,••'..•ti:/.:1:.''..,,;iiiff!,,t;',$.,,..V 0,!.?....:•;..1.0...,!.'•.•.,V..,,:i.,.'•.%.11 .'•',..'•4;2•'''. 'k•'1,)P'fif'..••(.''. •• r:•`')... •
'''..;.:''''';';'•'•'''4..'.•‘; t ; ''!••.'"•"'. :'.4,;.".•••••''‘./.1i'l•••••'..•., 1.•...\',:'..fr‘...;'?'%1.•••';'f'':••••••••••V''''''''''' ;.;3;'''1...‘":1".1'')IP.;14.•••:::",;.'•;,1', :i..1.0.\.•P.4:1'0.6Z•itil. •''''''S/' i 1
1 r 4 '•;:'!Yil•'•q•;.•••:t••''''.::••‘.13'...?.....(-i•i'''F'1••'.'•‘ic.'f;:•Ji•,,i'.'• '• ;•;i1-•-.'V .44'..'::'.::?:;•:..' •
.1'.1ti.•'.';%•:•. !•‘•:.:/;:' •0.'...',1•':..,'"-•:). ..(:,;•f?;1.i:1..;;•••"P:.:(1...;/•' ;....•''.'''41''';I.J";•;fr';' '1•:;;Iiin.P:d•:464.i...st.,..i).. )•Pc,../4:4"j,V1.1'S:?d'''':•..11'4•1 0.,‘Aii'vi;i:....!•.:41.1s;!;4t\i',-;:f".e.:....';iYii0.;;;k:..:Apte.:K.46 I ;',.;;;a'...:I.;.'''''• '..;••1::'
1•2's'i...).4'`'...',..V.,;.4 ,,..*:',...pi....•11 t.91.1....•r..,•,,y. .,.,...,f vi.tp,...,:.?....,.s.:. .:•.(....:•'!.., ;I,.,, ,•11....1,,c,..1-41........i...;:.,;,•i.4,,.,,,,•a,r,r.,.k 111;•.„,ii •4.f. „:. :.,;-,q,t..4 0: i i ,E., :z.;'.1•,4;•,.V.'!,..0,.,.1,"7,1. ,:,,.....',...fit.:1; •::''1:. '.....'''''••. '
!...,:..,f,,,-.3....,:::.....,..:-.;..:..., •., .....,.';,...'. .!.t::.....',*.',,..A,f,:•:,Y'•,:,..::.,1;"..:'%•,,,..4:-,..', '..:s.)1,,,, ;q.i%,';'„,'..,'?:W0 ,..l,r°.:4..;„- 1:1;nt':;? ''t,','! .-'i.: ..i.!':'.,?1;)i .' .Ili'.•*?1..,•• •,‘:.•, •..j.:‘.--A'..,?:',: ::..... .. .... ....
'.:.::::1',.... ',,- ,,..-III I*, ,',',: iy,,•:.:-, ,;,.:.,,,,C,,.i• "...'-',!.`,....,,:.i:ri..4:r•'.,'•:•,!,:)•. ;Y.':h::.".•'• ..1r,",.,... ,.';';,.-.;:q:',:,17 13,, •-•i .•-•,,.y,....,,.. ,.:.•,'••...::, -, , •• •,•• • -: ,,••••• , • •
•
.
CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN
PLVIR6 P^DP? 'SON
CRY OF RENTON
* * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * *
PROJECT TITLE: �‘s-\-\.\\LA 6-1(-\ SEP 2 91989
APPLICANT: ` RECEIVED
APPLICATION NUMBER: SA— 1\2 —effl
The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the
pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City
Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to
site plan approval.
ASSESSOR'S
NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER
1 Le.,,ultA,►ter G o c Wt t ' 539.
7— 141- -l-r-12 ��� - At-- •
lArA a 9
�-►� mil`'`?
3 -� `�—' - •rre�. n1•t�Lk 17
ASSESSOR'S
NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER .I III
.
d
Intl
r
ASSESSOR'S
NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER
CERTIFICATION
%A �J!1' %'y , :reby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their
a.• esses wer:'taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary, Public, in and for the State of Washington
residing at �� ' ca,l�_ on
the \V— day of n,1 ,r-'.
SIGNED:
CERTIFICATION OF MAILING
I. (( . vim hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site
plan approval were I mailed on \-2_12_,5{ , to each listed adjacent property owner as
prescribed by law.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a
Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington
residing at ,�;iiro , on
the �4,-t1 day of\ •c, Let Ccq .
ni c -O00 SIGNED:
FORM 20B
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL AL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:
DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 12, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 12/22/89
EFC - 112 - 89
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-112-89
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME & CO. •
PROJECT TITLE: BLUME-DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and sevice areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a . 99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
-remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project site
is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
L LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W. ,
SITE AREA BUILDING AREA (gross) :
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
l,: Earth ° ° °
C
2 . Air °
J ° ° ° i
3 . Water ° ° °
° ° °
LY. Plants , °
° ° °
51. Animals ° , 0 °
° ° °
6I'h Energy & _Natural Resources °
° ° °
R. Environmental. Health °
a
° ° °
8. Land & Shoreline Use °
v 0 0 0 _
9. Housing °
o— ° ° -
10. Aesthetics °
° °
11. Light & Glare " °
° ° °
12 . Recreation
° ° °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
14 . Transportation °
15. Public Services °
16. Utilities ,i ° °
COMMENTS:
I
i
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is,, needed to properly assess this
proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
JEVELOPIV,E T APPUUCATISN REVIEW SHEET
ECF-112-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA 112-89
PROPONENT: Bruce Blume & Co.
PROJECT TITLE: Blume Distribution Facility
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- a . 99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project
site is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/29/89
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON .
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
•
DATE
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
•
...... • . •. • .
•. • , ..„-„ •-:-. :•:.!:• •-,'-,..7 .: ..-,..,-;•-:::-.,:..„.:':,;:, -.. -.-:.,..r.„-... ;'',.Y.'•;.'-;:?..',.;:.-. V.,..?-,. ..--i.'. ..- ,,15,..,r2:74 ,c,. -_,..-,..r.,...: ,•,..- - ..`.::,..: :...',.:::::•.-J.'s.....'-ii... -:-:-'‘..y.•;•.. ,.. ..--'-'.•:••••`:,,, .. ‘....,...'..:....f:'';',,.;...,•:::!:,. • - ., •- :......
:': •••.• • ' '.,....."'..:: .•.,,',;:;, ' ..'.'.-:.:•t,',: -'..:-:',..':.c'k:';',1:-....."liii.:'.;:.' ".c,';',':::,.::::- .,.'..-,e1.--:.: ,.'..,..', •".,--,..'.'r..,-'''.'..''. . ' '''!';'..::-.'l' ' ::';', • Cs '`,' .. •'' . ' '..:''‘.'' ':::.;-:-'''-'''' '.;''''
. . .
•
44
.... . . .
cb , ... .....,,..., •,:;;,..::::.
. • . . .
. • aos„
. _ • ........ . . . 1/ ...,,. .. •.. . . ,. • . • . ",Roe . .4vsy • .. .
. i . - • -• e '. , : , .. „ . •. , • ., 4k • •• - • .. . ..
. •dri.•
. .
,.... " .
•. • . . . ,
• . . . . .. . ... ., -
. ._..., .
, ••- .. - „ . . . . • •
. . . .. , ..... .. ... .
. .
. . .
..,.._. . . . . . . . ,. . . . . . .
•. . ,
'' .• ' .:.1. .',....'• ..... ;•.,':,'.:-•'.i'-','''.'",-.'..f."::'-'''''''-'.. .,:----.''-,','''•'-;''"-... ::-..,.-.;',:...':' ''''. '-: • • -' ' . ' ''''
• • . ... .. . .. . . . . i •... ,.._.., .
•
t •„,...: RPCI 242364912205 • - . CAN:00000SUP:0000006 S/M:._ -000000 - STATUS:ACTiVE ,
. _
. .
•
. . FOR OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 - • • •
SEATTLE AREA PLUMBING AND 0N9999 . •
PIPEFITTING 01/28/91 BEG NE CORNER OF NW 1/4
315 GARDEN AVE NO ' TH N 87-26-48 W 1214 FT
RENTON WA!' • 98055 TO WLY MGN OF CO RD NO 3 •
LOT24-23.-04 BLOCK:9122 . LAST LEGAL ' CHARLES MONSTER RD SW NOW . • .
- ' IS 30 . KNOWN AS STEEL HILL RD..,... 1 - .RY OY ST SC NC LEVY OM-LV - • LAND 'IMPS • BILLED• PAID P A , •
92 T 1 2110 531 ,500 • .00 .00 . . ..
. --•
6, 134.94 .00 F . • . . -
: .
. .,.. i'.
.-._ 91 T1 2110 531500 .
1 • TOTAL TAX DUE: 6, 174.49 • -
. .
YR FF/AC I.E DIST BENACRE BENEFIT ST BILL ST. PAID FF BILL FF PAID ' RECEIPT DATE •
..-. . 92 1 '[ 5.57 • • 5.51 .00 . • . .00 „ .. •.
, • . .:,:::.::.:
91 1 1 5.57 5.51 ' - 39.55 „ - .00
• i ASI2 ADDITIONAL DATA P/N • - •• . -.•.
. .
...-. 1. . . •
. .
i . •
. ,
• . •,,.. , ., •.:. ,7 . ,. ., . 7. ,. • . ... . • , .
1 ,
-- - .
---
1 .
i , . . . . ., .:.......
.... • . , . .,.
•
1 .
. .... - I • • . . , . .• .
. . . . ... . ..„
• ,. ,-...,
. -
1 . .
. . . ,. .
----
, . „., . _ . ... . ... .
-.. -..:. •;'.:.:,.. ..:,:•.:
. .
. ,
• . . . . . • • •
. . . .• . . ••,• „•..... „ .
. , . :,-:: -.. .-.--.....'••••.:-.;-:-./.'
. .
. • .. . .. . .•._. . .. .. .. „_ ... .
. , .
. ... . , .
• ,
. . .
.........•• . ,
. : -• ' .-• ' ,-...2-, .>::.- '.. ...1.,..::....,,,zA,,,,,,',.-,'„•.A.,. , ,,./,,,....,,..,-,:r. ....,...,:;2:2- . ,,, ,..... •,,,.......,, ., ..,, ,‘.,..;.:. ,,....... ,, ...,. ,......, . . .,, ...... !_.: -• ',... 2.
'..;':.''''''':.*:•••:;•:-,::;...,...'''5:•';'. '.....,:;i,
•. . .
. ... .- • . - . ..... . . , _ , .
. . . , .
. . •,._ . • . . . . . - .. • . ,....,---„-
. .. .
•• .•. .. .:. ....,..,,,..,_,
_ _ . . _ _ _ - .--,-....--,.. ,• ., :•:...,/•?..,•!4.,,, ,v
-
.. • . , , _ . . ' • - . . " i:.:.::!::c..,: ,....0.:;!:,,,
• - • . ., . . . • ,. ,•
•.. . . ,
. .. . .
•
. ... . ,.• --... .,.-,. ,.:;:: , : :..:. .,, ••.::,.;...` -,-.:,.',,:•'i. •.....: : ...'.‘,..,"'..2„..'.;,. :,..'..;,;Tv.: ....„.....::.r, ....•:;',...-.. ...-... ,:-;. :. ,.......2_... .. ,,,: - , •:. ., , .i.:,..., •:-... .; ,,::::::.:. •.... .,:,..'..;,!- ••::-;.:....,:,.. -.z.:,;f::
. ' • . -
.•
. . . . 1 . • . r, :. ..i...:.;.„-.-,,,,....,-.....-.. ,..i._-,..]:r„,..-:.'.......,..........,:::;.2, .-:,..... ,. ,f,:r.'•,-......., ,:.„,-.,..,.::.;.‘,:-.-::,•,:•'....,. .:- -,,r,..... ...,.••2.: . • -.. ,....:....,'„ '. -,:, ; : •.. .,--.•.• , •!, •.,'--'•',i,...,..-- ..-.):t:7;•;... :::::/.?..•,;0.,;.
• .
• ; .2.• :. '... „--,,..",-'',:',..•?;:--•':... .'--.'...-!?'.,.:'••r.....:'---:1 '• :.-'-;•-•(''..-;"'"'•,•'.., 'Y'.•'r:- ; .'''''!..- "''''.'1 . , . " . '''''''''''. ' '. ;' .' - . . . '-'' . - '', '' ..- !i.,:.:i.•i.';',?;Z,:',;!,:
I .
,• . ,..:.'.1;.-•j:',. .:::::,.:,",:::`....
• 1 , • . , , - . .- • • , < • • • . „
' . =• . , . .. - • .
, •
. •
•
I • • .. . • •.' ' .'•:‘`-• '','• ,• ' ''-,''' ''''Ir..: . ':!,'.•_ '4:.,'.1.r!r••:,-I--, .-:‘.',,','..;:1.,'.'•,!:.,'.',-', .',..'l, •,:',..2"......1':'2':',.',,,• ,.: .,',.:•,,''.. ' -• ' '..:,.. .''..,...:'''.i,••':•,,,,,' ;.,..:;'•.;./,:.:::.,;:
I ' . '••.- ::',1-„,...- ,:...„..:.-..--e,
i . .
• • 1 . . • . . .. . ., . .
. . _., , , -. . . , f , . • :
• • ....'.1:.`,.'';':1;-'''-',.'-
. ,
1 . , •
. ..
I . •' ' . •• • . , .• ;:!:•";•,.. ..:,:',.'',:•.:;:
. . • ' • • ,, . . . .
• . . .. •.;•,.,,,.....I ., . • , , . . . . .,.„. .,. .,..
• • • .• - • ' r •
. .. , ,....„......,.....i., •...
. 1 • , .
.. ., . - '. .. ,- : .: . • • •
•
. .
. • . r. --,,,,, ,. .
. . . ,
TH S 32-12-33 E 85.47 FT ' :',. .. .TH ON. CURVE TO ROT RAD OF . .
256.48 1FT & ALG SD WLY. MGN . • 139.14 FT TH S 01-24-51 E 268 FT . .
...-:-..'-- -r
TH S 13E3-35-09 W 436.55 FT • TH S 02-33-12 W 115.03 FT . .
;...,....,-.-.,...,,...-. .,.:
%.-. TH S 70-05-34 W 95.47 FT - TH S 88-37-17 W 105.38 FT •• .
. • TH N Of-22-40 W 179.50 FT TO C/L OF ESMT FOR RR SPUR
;;.:-.:..,...'..:..:::•;.:.•.
_ .
LN UNDk DEED OF AUD FILE ' • NO 5331102 & THE FOE
. .. •• .
;;:.•,..•,-::•,..;:•:.::".:...-.'
. • -. - TH N 01-22-40 W 193.40 FT TH S 88-op-08 W 380.28 FT . .
- • TH S 54-28-10 W -365.34 FT TO C/L OF SD RR SPUR LN ESMT , . ,.. , ,......
„ .....-...
. •
TH S 27-09-57 E 22.44 FT TH ON CURVE TO LFT RAD OF
365.32iFT & ALG THE C/L OF . SD RR SPUR LN ESMT 857.54 FT _ . . .
. .
. .
TO POE: -- AKA PARCEL 4-A OF ' UNRECORDED SURVEY_REVIS.ED . .
AUGUST1' 14, 1990 & REVISED' ' OCTOBER 189 1990 • . .. . .
. .
•
.... REGULAR TAX PORTION: • S • RECEIPTS
DATE NUMBER
• . RY . TAX PAID . LAND A/V IMPS A/V SCE - " DA "
• 90 . 1 3, 153.29 ' 232,400 04/30/90 0156889
. . ... .1
. .
10/29/90 0452141 . , • ••.,
. ...-...
,...-•
OMITTED TAX PORTION: • . .
RY OY : TAX PAID LAND A/V ' - IMPS'A/V ':-..;,..„ - ..,.. ...... . . . .
00 00 .00 , . _
, . _ _ • . . , . . . .
RPCI 242304912205 _
. . . . . ...
- P/P
..::::.-".. . %141'4°('); ;;'''''': : :::::::: :;: '''
.,..-. ,,
• . . , .• :. . .. . .. .... , .. . :.
07,
;.,..2• . .
. . . , atIN.4".0 . •. ' • '-'•••••,''`•-„:"...-,:.:--r-'.''.
. .. . .
. . . .. . .. . . .. ,. ..„... . , . . . . .
. ,
. .. .
U...." . ' - ' • ‘.'-: .. ' . ; •: ":' -'''''''.: ''':'.'' ,‘;:::''',1 ;•• .:;:j'::1:''....',.:::.H' ..,:, ' _' : '.V1':''::::.- . '...,...''' •, ,'''. . :0 '... , 'el. ...N, ,:,‘6: _ .,'.: • :::.:,:::-M.:g
•
' ' . • . . '' ' . c,.. 4 ' ...qz,_• Ne :: :...' .-...‘.1.:: ::::::,X::;rs.
„ .. . , •
, y`4V -;. 0,%, , . • ':..:''..:..;'.:.::•:.:. ...-.
. . ' ' . , .-t• • ‘40 . ' "-.•..-:•••,::::::: ::;
-\._. . .
• . . ,•:.:•....,,...
.. .
. ..
' .
. .,• , „..:,•,,
- -. e.. ... . .. .-•.,
. ..,..... • •
. . •.•: , _ ,•••••••,.. ,
. . .. .. .. .. . .. . , .. ., . , ... .. •
i . , ,.. .... _. .
.. .. ......
' . • . . ,.. :‘::•-•.:::-......-.
• .
.. ,
. . . .. ,. ..,. .,..• . • . . . , .„ . , ,
..._ . .
1 - , .. ; -.'. ..:..:....,...-..
. .., . . ......
• , . . . .
•• . , . "..„ - _, . .• . , .- ... ..• • .
. '
• •
1-28-91
. • I . :.
These are the new legals for account: 243404 9120 and 9122s as per segregation of December 12, 1990.
• . .. .
. . . .
Elaine Hawkins diaitN.
.... .. .. . . . I • Abstract Technician N 0 V
PLANNING DIVISION .
• cirri OF RENTON '14 4.1, .
. 296 53.36 • • .0%, • ill 1•4, . .•
.
.---
la. 3:1 1991 '• .. e.0 10 40 •' : ,. .. .
" ,___. ittako i'7..,11jED . • ''. . -- 4/0,5, .
/A: !• -: :
•
RPCI 242304912007 • CAN00000 SUP:0000000 S/M: -000000 STATUS:ACTIVE • .
ELAND BUILDING PARTNERSHIP 069800 POP OF NW 1/4 & OF GOV LOT 1 . .
PO BOX 80187 01/28/91 IN SECTION 24-23-04 & THE
. .--. SEATTLE WA 98108 SW 1/4 & GOV LOT 6 IN SECTION
13-23-04 DAF - BEG THE QUARTER ,
LOT:24-23-04 BLOCK:9120 LAST LEGAL CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 & 24 .
..„ IS .49 TH N 87-26-48 W 1214 FT
• RY OY ST SC NC LEVY OM-LV LAND IMPS BILLED PAID P A
92 T 2110 2Y025,000 .00 .00
- - 91 T 2110 2,025,000 23,373.95. .00 F
. TOTAL TAX DUE: 23,447.53
YR FF/ACRE DIST BENACRE BENEFIT ST BILL ST PAID FF BILL FF PAID RECEIPT DATE
92 1 10.35 10.25 .00 .00
91 - 1 10.35 10.25 ' 73.58 • .00
, .
, .
ASI2 ADDITIONAL DATA ' P/N , . . ..
-,.... .
. ,
-- : . --
• . . .
. -
, .
• • - . . - • . .
, . - • . . .
. . ,
' • .
_ . . . .
. . . .
.... . . • .
. ' ....,. ,
, .
' • ' ,
• - ,, . . .
. .
,:••:::,.•
..,..
.,.,'.%
. .
. . .
- ' - • '-:- .....':.
. . . .,-':.,.... . .
. .
. . •• .-,,.!:.:,:l.,:s;l:;:;
. . .. . . . ,...-:„.„
• .... . . - ,.N.!:::: .;
• • • •.,...,...
.
'
, ;S•::;•;;.
•.,::. • :-: •!;::g
, - • '• :•:. .:•-: .i.
. . . ... •-' •- • , -
. , . . . . • . • ••, ••E:-.:• a•
• • ..
• . , . . . • ,•:-;,1 •: :f.:•
.. .
. ....-::,!,..,,,..:.
., .\-: - .• .. , •
• • •••:-'•:?;:•::::
. ••-'. .:•••,--•
. ,....
• • :.... •:?..,
' • , , '
. . . . ,
. .
••_. . ,
. .
• , " , :••:-.:1•,;::••;-•••
• • .:--.....-.--
, :• •-.:::,.;•:;-.
• ',....
, - - - - ::...:',':•
'---- TO WLY MGN OF CO RD NO 8 CHARLES MONSTER RD SW & NOW . . .f.-'.....'
KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD TH S 32-29-51 E 85o34 FT :::.„.. ,,:•
.-.......f..:..
. .
. - TH ON CURVE TO RGT RAD OF 256.48 FT DISTANCE - '.....:-
OF 139. 14 FEET TH S 01-24-51 E 268 FT
TH S 88-35-09 W 436.55 FT TH S 02-33-12 W 115.03 FT
.,,...:
- • TH S 70-05-34 W 95.47 FT TH S 88-37-17 W 1,05+3g_FT , .:- •
• . - TH N 01-22-40 W 372.90 FT TO POB TH •S 88-03-09 W 380.28 FT
TH S 54-28-10 W 372.95 FT TO ELY MGN OF _CHICAGO.' '. .. 1.:
MILWAUKEE ST PAUL AND PACIFIC RR CO R/W
TH N 28-11-33 W 115+75 FT • TH ON CURVE TO RGT RAD OF
. .
... •
411 .73 FT DISTANCE 57.49 FT TH N 20-11-33 W 156.01 FT
TH ON CURVE TO RGT RAD OF ' 523.68 FT DISTANCE 419.12 FT
TAP OF CURVE RAD OF 667.96 FT RAD BEARING N 06-57-18 W TH
ELY ALG SD CURVE 102.86 FT TH N 83-41-02 E 60.83 FT
TH N 74-13-19 E 47.60 FT TO SLY MGN OF CHARLES MONSTER • .
'--- CO RD SW SD PT BEING ON CURVE • RAD OF 238.99 FT RAD PT BEARING
N 17-19-04 E TH ELY ALG SD CURVE & SLY MGN 80.36 FT
TH N 88-03-09 E 470.93 FT • ' TH S 01-56-51 E 10 FT
:, •,- TH N 88-03-09 E 26.53 FT TAP BEARING N 01-22-40 W FR .
, .
POB TH S 01-22-40 E 515 FT TO TPOB - AKA PARCEL 2 OF
UNRECORDED SURVEY REVISED MARCH 22, 1990 & REVISED -. .
.---- RPCI 242304912007 • ASI2 ADDITIONAL DATA P/N
•
-;•.,.-
,
. . .-....-
. . .
,...., . ,. . „1.0-1A „A • .... . i.•..':Q:'.:
. ' .
• . , , .
. . ....,
• 61 -zslfro . '...4
. . ... -
.,..., 0•
. , • l
I
' •
4* . . . ... . . . .
. • ' • . .V '.
. . . .
. .
.. c.. : • b
.. .
. , . .. . .
. ,,...
. . .
• '.: .•.:'..•
, .
. ...,,, .
• ..,, ._...,
. .
.., . .„ . . ,. . . .. . ' •
did
4' CIT' OF RENTON
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator
November 27, 1990
Art Hitchings
Bush, Roed and Hitchings
2009 Minor Avenue East
Seattle, Washington
RE: Blume Distribution Segregation (Lot #4) (SA 112-89)
Dear Mr. Hitchings:
Attached please find a copy of a memorandum from Mike Dotson,
City of Renton Property Management Division, approving your
proposed modifications to the segregation of Lot #4, Blume
Distribution.
When you have completed filing of this segregation with King
County, we would appreciate your sending a copy of all
documentation to the City Clerk so that it may be filed in the
project records for File No. SA 112-89 .
If you have questions or would like additional information,
please contact me at 235-2550.
Sincerely; ,
Le ora Blauman
Senior Planner
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569
IJ -
PLANNING DIVISION
• 1,11Y l)F RF1J110N
CITY OF. RENTON \I 13 1990
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 13, 1990
TO: Lenora Blauman,Senior Planner •
•
FROM: . Mike Dotson, Property Management
•
Randy Phelps,Survey
SUBJECT: LEGAL REVIEW Blume Dist.Segregation SA-112-89
Segregation of lot 4
•
We have reviewed the legal and map for the Blume Distribution Segregation and have find the
modifications to the lot line between lots 2 and 4-A to be satisfactory.
•
segregation/blume/mdd
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
CITY OF RENTON ®V 3 1990
RECEIVED
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 13, 1990
TO: Lenora Blauman,Senior Planner
FROM: Mike Dotson,Property Management
Randy Phelps,Survey
SUBJECT: LEGAL REVIEW Blume Dist.Segregation SA-112-89
Segregation of lot 4
We have reviewed the legal and map for the Blume Distribution Segregation and have find the
modifications to the lot line between lots 2 and 4-A to be satisfactory.
segregation/blume/mdd
SA=112-89
HIED Fro RECORD AT REQUEST Uj
OFFICE HE CITY CLERK
RENTON iv uNICIPAL BLDG.
200 MILL AVE. SO.
RENTON, WA 98055
AGREEMENT TO WAIVE PROTEST OF FORMATION OF LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT AND/OR OFF-SITE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS.
AN AGREEMENT BETWEENB & G LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND ELAND
BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND THE CITY OF RENTON TO WAIVE
PROTEST OF FORMATION OF AN LID AND/OR OFF-SITE ROADWAY
IMPROVEMENTS DUE TO POTENTIAL REALIGNMENT OF OAKSDALE AVE. SW
RIGHT-OF-WAY. (See Exhibit B for Potential Roadway
Realignment) .
WHEREAS, B & G Limited Partnership, a Washington limited
partnership (B&G) , and Eland Building Limited Partnership, a
Washington limited partnership (Eland) , are the Owners of
certain real property located in the City of Renton,
Washington, the legal description of which is set forth on
Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference (the "Property") ; `and
WHEREAS, the real property owned by B&G and Eland which will
be developed for Warehouse uses will have an impact on tYie
need for street lighting, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, one a`1fTu n
tri
roadway improvement, sanitary sewer line extension, and:W:;- -_ ,
c undergrounding of overhead electrical and communication i-r u=
distribution lines currently on Oaksdale Avenue SW; and:-,:r:: _ r
• WHEREAS, as a condition of the Determination of Non- ' ' --
Significance (Mitigated) issued under City of Renton
ECFG-112-89, owners are required to proceed with design and ,
construction of off-site improvements prescribed by City ;
ordinance, and whereas it has been determined to be in the
best interests of the City and property owners to defer such
improvements until the City completes it' s design analysis of
the alignment of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. , owners or any
subsequent owners agree to participate in a local improvement
district as authorized RCW 35. 43 for the above stated
improvements, when such local improvement district is formed
in the future. Should the City determine realignment will not
occur within ten (10) years from the date of this agreement,
the property owner agrees,-to proceed with street lighting,
curbs, sidewalks, gutters, one-half roadway improvements,
sanitary sewer line extension, and undergrounding of overhead
electrical and communication distribution lines abutting the
Property subject to owner' s rights pursuant to paragraph 5
herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows:
1. Owners acknowledge that state and city law provide that
the City may require certain real property improvements to
be made by Owners as conditions of, and to mitigate
Page 1 90/09/2 r 41241 D
RECFEE 2. 00
CASHEEL a::►: :16. 00
1oajboo(ic� . �l . ��'7. /
effects of, development, and further acknowledge that the
consideration. for this Agreement shall be approval of
development on the Property without requiring Owners to
make such improvements until a future date as determined
by the City of Renton and as described herein.
2 . Owners acknowledge that the City has discussed and plans
to form a local improvement district to improve Oakesdale
Avenue SW to include street lighting, curbs, sidewalks,
gutters, one-half roadway improvements, sanitary sewer
line extension, and undergrounding of overhead electrical
and communication distribution lines on Oaksdale Avenue
SW.
3 . Owners acknowledge that the Property would be specially
benefited by the improvement of Oaksdale Avenue SW to
include street lighting, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, one-
half roadway improvements, sanitary sewer line extension,
and undergrounding of overhead electrical and
KI' communication distribution lines and agree to participate
in the aforementioned local improvement district, which
shall be formed for the purposes of providing such.
CTJ 14. Owners acknowledge that if the existing right-of-way
alignment is retained in the local improvement district
CD
final design analysis. of Oakesdale Avenue SW fronting the
the Property that the owners agree to dedicate ten (10)
feet of right-of-way to Oaksdale Avenue SW to accommodate
the required one-half roadway widening and, if no local
improvement district is formed within ten (10) years from
the date of this agreement, to proceed with design and
construction of street lighting, curbs, sidewalks,
gutters, one-half roadway improvements, sanitary sewer
line extension, and undergrounding of overhead electrical
and communication distribution lines abutting the Property
subject to owner's rights pursuant to paragraph 5 herein
within ninety (90) days upon written request from the
City.
5. Owners waive their right 'to protest the formation of any
local improvement district formed for the purposes set
forth in paragraph (3) above; and limited to the
improvements described above, provided, however, owners
shall retain the right to protest the following:
a. The method of .assessment; and
b. The amount of assessment and special benefit to
the Property; and
c. The boundaries of the local improvement district
and the total amount of the local improvement
Page 2
district cost.
6. This agreement shall be a covenant running with the land
and shall be filed and recorded in the records of King
County, Washington and shall be binding upon the Owners
and subsequent property owners, their successors, and
assigns.
DATED this /g•/ day of 4 , 1990.
{ OWNERS: B & G L TED PARTNERSH
By' i ?
s l�-•�
ELAND B ILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
vri
0 By: '4(,) . 4 1:-.
7-1 It
ACCEPTED BY CITY OF RENTON:
y\..
By: U\A �,... N
APPRO AS TO 'ORM:
Lawrence J. yerren
City Attorney_
Page 3
I ,
ACKNOWLEDGED THIS / ' ' DAY OF S , 1990.
ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
a Washington limited partnership
By Mons er Road Building Corp. ,
a Wa ington Corporation
By
Tit/le:
B & G NTON PARTNERSHIP,
a Wa gton limited • : ership
vi ruce M. Blume, ' .n *ging General Partner
kezr
C�2
•
ll-
STATE OF �`�,S{'i j/��-( ) )
) ss.
COUNTY OF /� )
On this y' tday of U , 1990, before
me, the undersigned, a Notary Publid- in and for the State of
/A):141',/, ), , duly commissioned and sworn, personally
appeared t?/tQ , , to me known to be a
General Partner of B & G RENTON PARTNERSHIP, the partnership
that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the
said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of
said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to
execute the said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed
the day and year first abo i ten<
4. B NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the StatepN Rq 4i or Wa ington, esidin t
ssioNrE;tel�vie lei �� C
tr. *7,4%7 ie My commission expihres: /C)--f f
9 PUBUt iZt
se h,�„`WASN"
•
•
!STATE OF Wint S K(tiJ G 1 O n)
ss.
;COUNTY OF h/AI G )
On this ILLT'K day of Uc7U s % , 1990, before
me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of
LuAS}-EwGTo N , duly commissioned and sworn, personally
appeared s 0 1,0, I l.A-n. A 4 T. , to me known to be the
• President of Monster Road Building; Corp. , the corporationa
that executed the foregoing instrument as the general partner
,of ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and acknowledged the
;said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of
;said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein
!mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to
execute the said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed _ ,
,the day and year first above written.
,1 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for he State
or Washington, residing at
My commission pires: ,
C•2
C
aJ
BUS 2OED & HITCHINGS, INc.
PARCEL 2:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 24,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. p IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4
EAST, W.M. , ALL IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24, IN SAID TOWNSHIP
AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
;QUARTER 1,214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 3, CHARLES
MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH.
32°29'51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 85.34 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENT
CURVATURE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAS(ING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ARC OF 31°04'57", AN ARC LENGTH
139. 14 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 30 FEET WESTERLY, PERPENDICULAR TO SAID
CENTERLINE OF STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH O1°24' 51" EAST, ALONG SAID
ESTERLY MARGIN, 268.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE
1SOUTH 02°33' 12" WEST 115.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88°37' 17" WEST 105.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°22'43" WEST 437.90
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°03'09" WEST 283.04 FEET;
0 THENCE SOUTH 54°28'10" WEST 490.44 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO,
Cy MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE NORTH
9-4 28°11'33" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 115.75 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO
THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 411.73 FEET AND ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 57.49
FEET; THENCE . NORTH 20°11'33" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 156.01 FEET;
CD THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 523.68 FEET AND ALONG SAID
Q EASTERLY MARGIN 419.12 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS
OF 667.96 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 6°57' 18" WEST; THENCE
EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 102.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 83°41'02" EAST 60.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74°13'19" EAST 47.60 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF
CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD SOUTHWEST, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE HAVING A
RADIUS OF 238.99 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 17°19'04" EAST;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHERLY MARGIN 80.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH
88°03'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 470.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°56'51"
EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 10.00FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°03'09" EAST ALONG
SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 26.53 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 1°22'43" WEST
FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 1°22'43" EAST 450.00 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 450,000 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
L. t 1O, BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
N. 0 � RENTON, WASHINGTON
BRH JOB NO. 89219.04
V.
0 FEBRUARY 7, 1990
j 71 z ALH/SURV. 34
° �c.G/STEMgy �� ,�1*S►
�J, � ,w
UAW
BUST- OED & HITCHINGS, INc.
PARCEL 4:
1
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION '24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE
4 EAST, W.M. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 't
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 'AND 24 IN SAID TOWNSHIP
AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 'NORTHWEST
QUARTER 1214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES
MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST; THENCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
85.34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET A
DISTANCE OF 139.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°24'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
268.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2°33'12"
WEST 115.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET;. THENCE SOUTH
88°37' 17" WEST. 105. 38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH
. 1°22'43" WEST 437.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°03'09" WEST 283.04 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 54°28' 10" WEST 490.44 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE CHICAGO,
MILWAUKEE, ST.• PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT—OF—WAY; THENCE
SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 1610.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY
MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD, SAID POINT BEING ON A NON—
TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.37 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS
NORTH 66°59'43" EAST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID 'CURVE AND WESTERLY MARGIN
250.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED
FILED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8606190933, 1RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH
48°12'23" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 420.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH
9°O1'55" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 125.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH
04 ,46°16'56" EAST ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 17.69 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 4°58'17" WEST 410.23 FEET TO THE. TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING
0/ 612,566 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
C7
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
LW l "SC � RENTON, WASHINGTON
" 0 � BRH JOB NO. 89219.04
�. .'�ii � FEBRUARY 7, 1990
�A
!X z ALH/SURV. 34
•
VI: PI
p c,\ .
a
j •
•
A Pcriioll of S W 1/4, SW 1/4, of Sec. 13, Twp. 23 /V., 129.-4 .E., W.M. ----Lii-
1.1,§ • NM
AlnQ COunit/, WCishfrKi/IX7
•
.
/1( • . twAr*.c.1.1 cap suri----..-wrik.lfAL
IN_Allgulir 1:
. •- PSOP,-,,,,,tv.„,• -11.
,,. ..r.-4.z....„. • _ .1,42D- _ ..1)iti\ -\*Y.4 — 'I .
/*. '.•.:0, . ';‘,., 5.°,;;yr.-A Al ON STER ROAD
21111111M it 7 7 wili_., .
cy• ---: to -,i, 2..___.:= 1,-- sc.-24-1..:_A 50476' •-.2.-.T :S. ..t.
262100' -' 333 76• 1,93,,. .
/ .1.ft9 CI' •51'...-R.237 44,1 . . -r- ii,w- ..„ 7 i!..,.. ..
, 41;.• ..7 ik • 0-.-IL.I..414 ,.. . N.II• .
4(1"' 6.A9S:•-li C .
k •:...... -7,-: -I; "I.-' .,
y.t,r -_.v... •
. -. • . VICINITY MAP 0
b R.25.1& . .
13 ' ..,
7:
.- .1'': 's •
N/44'?• Parcel I. :,..
T .
. -.,
c) .., .317.772 Sq.fl. / 3/0.000 Sq.Ft .t.
CO - • (Ina Yoo.12ood A itr:E. / -..
of Rood) .: .9. .4.
4) .., . .. '
Vez ... / . • 4.-,50 5,- 250 5'. '
...6'
1i" • n• G7ZAf.)-2 Re. ;Ravi
Z . • ...___093-3373-.• ,,,, A2.. Mem ...,
0 - :. Orxd Rec.Na 0606/90933 15
.3/0.6906F 1,..--- - law ---—_____....
..- .
- •:. :-.. 1.-.
.71'.;:; .-• 14 .r. ,i.--.. --.- .
. i • . 1.-. .b
-- ' -1.-- --P • : _..,.-
QV k • ....).. . : k//
.
N 0,23: .113-ff ..Z a. — -- _______ ___ ______ . .... ..,
- -
so,t'sn •ISI w 4.3130- - .1 os-serira .:--.a "s°°- -
----• . - • . .,. 0,,,....„.... ..,o .
r; a
Z . . /Z6%
- -
" - . •
•K .
Z T i Parcel 4 • . -9, .
" .=:'• ,1 GI
612.566 Sq.ft. 09
et Z .• ii`s6 of14
. • AlP
III -Z° Parcel 2 - CD
l'`.. 450.COp Sq.f1.
(-1) • 9p f;. Iv .
•?:,_ •..0* PA/2 GEL SEGI2EGATION MAP
.7.
, . .
g ,7. 0,0°
1 .''''A•230 II
..-ay. 1996" i.... ' - .
or'd
..-, --TF.
.---,-,VW/Y/3-4 51.
/ :-... . •
/s.. 'VI 9.Or . PRINTED •
.
k • .
I •• -yi 0.1111°°G. ••
• FED 9 TM
• ezi
r '.".
•cl- 9--* OGC4).
. p .
0,.514 •
, 06•5-ria-w PA •
• a ,
--; ' 2 •••• ,I, 3. --__. _ -- - A.4's.°. --''. -- --- BLUME DIST.Q1BUTION FACILITY- --- -- -
-- ri bat-I
, .
• BUSH,ROED&HITCHINGS,INC. t,Yunn tv:
„,k. CIVIL ENGINEERS&LAND SUFiVEY011S CCL) 00to, 1.10.5 NO.
01-31.90 09219.04
/ l irfi.,i S',11 sEnri t.E.WASHINGTON 323-4144 i.,,,,,.....,0,„ -
r,-o5-;
c -f-(,9.11>(-�
'r'I4d. ,.+1 "y!. Yl -.N,•)1�•� •rw• ,?I•t�}•• 't31 ,[� ,;.a
,bt3.t,, }' j�c,1'f''7."'\','{! t,... ri, ,.i.'r7' n •,. w:L.n....:^:r
•:ar,.t• S,crf.•.. t�, T9�•..P .,1.,,�''„ p t,if 7i]]'NL�1J •Y,, ham, v....• i., st•"•fir ,S '.,Y .piS • ,s•.+. ..Su. +.."
�r 4• ..j�;`w� �,•y1'Y `7'';•�;�.i i�d•�'•;l'i�'t � ,�. ,' .F'• a�' +.k ... •yf'f',-+• ' •r,,"w'Y• `.%•;;, i�•r:+' � , i. ,7'��$z trll-.►� r♦�t.;
.i;r� r• ° '.'K•►a.',1:.3.��,.(1..+�',tiiC'L �1;• "' �'1fMt, .. lir', A t•• 'i ire••i �d:-•`.14h' ,.rya..« �.�• �i .y.. , „!'•Y t .;':,l-.a�t�,. =.
6.t��` tSGY7p` r " jt M, (' J. fJ �,� i s Gii• rS? K y :��V s� t "i.. • ,' 9' '' ;I / ►y ji it t 1i. }. • ,t• ''i: e) 4:•;,,'•r, 'lr. :•:�e:;•7 "is ,'. -f'i;,•` ;',
y y� ) tJ.i.j'' �e • i�r. f.' ZsX
•
Ar,��,. S �';�1� �' �y}, 1 1�A ► .,•
11• i ` •`"Y f�� ./ 3' t;(a` t,. I I:. Fig' y! • e . �, �"f y'y�-'%,
ft'!�' 1 t ♦ • , �' v( ♦. 'i l� •
7' ►tt> c ('J�►' L'M( r 4 r•:, C�,; .r gun,', ♦!t•' r
F'', MA ....t�ttCC� �j[N 3 Y k.,• ... 1,'��il:Zhti,.Z.!7tWrit'47 J1.r,.• . :i ....f : %'.
�'� .t ••SSA ttr. • •�~ .`•1,• • 'i F].� � •• 4,4:rik�.�,`.. i •
i' .!t:4j{,i.'"i-0.--.,•i1 ••:.- •G:k"'• • _"' • L..•:..5>-:lf•:.
,JjL^ 1 ,.-/ "1, P •
: ., J ...! V l � G• ;� :Z•• ,:St� ••� },v.y..i� :4 ,,�(^L:AY !, •? i,J ,•,t •
1' ' 7..a-.y ,Y,••t.' i .� 44.?;t. r.I' -1. f itt ,, 1! 247,,s. Y'1 b ••�••' �. t ••` i '. , _•
^/ r ,(y Sr ,S�!J, �y �• �s• t•!.� !f'r•��,.s:!>�. .l �.r�e'.�
,i V Y 7J r 4 J .�1.•�\ t. f ^ • Y'7` �Sc �>�.' iy J+)j iJJt fy z►/a- t• !r
.} l * ?, �,,.'t!`/+� it„•'t t 'I• ,/�,`I 'r t`'P;`I..,,3; Ill; �rtr;•' s ,r '
>r T a T u X , • f4 • I t r C,Yi•!!• I.. t1, ♦t A. ,,�•.. t.. . it .•R , � •I i,.•:*'� .+•,,�„.s 1
v�i.�: 3 1� �' Y t }, •. .•. • 15 a+ ►,'fit g t i
9�: V ..,,•.:•T is , ", 'c " c •.sk "+ /?I �// �.a �'`I.' .'9 1 • ''"�7 J .� ^I-f'4', ',." Sii,
,?• S•;•.4!: , ,.,,".'�'� ' .i •}y .: •4, � M11 / i�'�, ,,'1',..•t,,,o.,t'' 3"!y T�i'.It. 7 tl`. W., !•:41*i••yi.:4.-.4t'yy (, - ..' • •{ 1,4,, ti : y !••' ,, Vyi�•4.. r' '.lI: 0~ „'`.' ;;. •Y 'r,,' 9 •. rr•'• t
iti'NY ::.•• . ':., ,' ;;•. ,�.,ot�«�;,JJik♦ i. w' , ,l•.h1 A�'SI .il*. . f J f. 't, '�• • • •.I�' '.. r' t3 • •, 4i
,} ;v'1�::ile. y; j •• '.;i1 d / ,?`.•• tt t* 1)•r •,tp�: zI
y. t4 Y`••• • r. yR!r //Y• • �nll Ifl� �r� • t f Y'q�\• t: •f \�,;' :1` .l. x • • .‘,.,:•-:.
•
'ti. ,��"�' • i, • �'tati'\'., i,fj�,w' lhifF`'•t r 1 •• Y*•, r 'y)S', ,IL'1'' •'�• :Y' • t' •• M- �'•.• .:••}•`�f,'; �/+• ,%h� �{7 .....
,ce:-- ""',-:E ,.P
. „
i�"',^'^'�..D J'• •K tit•,►• to ••,o,: A, , �•� ,.4.,. . y'' iy ,. F, ,C{: •:c:RrlfrdffG.tytp. '� f` i �' S{.�':
, ` rtr ' (4. srl� •: .. •vf'b'r,k ,,'k>4k ,,��••it•..1 tJ• '4°41 • / •N.' f; •••t4 ;f1:`14. it'•t" `�» �`•I'r ' t••
U .�:Z.,}.:i f.' S ' •., a .frJ i •fi li;F. !( t` •
:a �� ) `3 r y \r i�
=+y3'• ,k..�, ..4"t1.t 4,?% Ifh.a-' 0 • ••,,,h Ai•
i'• v. w.';w l u,Ri � • ' =f.•.c\'`{ • 'fy'{ >y._ , f•f 7.•
' •42l<".J a[-`'••� .'• �
lily" �> ��' 1 " • • w.•.•`1{ •y n+} ` p �* T 'n Oh. "tt•
•'� � �rt 9���•(( . .4 A. tt`4_b� ;e ..�C t .' c k f''�' �} s i h �* Y kY .4.i
S i>�a+ih " i+x',A tlkt- ,,,1.. Y ' >•, f .a. -, ltj �, / .. .((1� ,0. S • 't1: , j�. 0
7•�,mitt.1. • n.„ V♦ • rill.,
. '^' '�' ,s I :q•4 ' ,� t�(f', l: f r vilitr. `. ' 'f i,t' 4'.:'..,.yOS'-3?•.:,.. .
•d`'d y`�`'^Fi.ii P:' t1 , f 'i%. J7y, '''I•t 7i S • .f`' kg Nt�•. �� , •',iv r.. ..�' R Q >ti�tri�
���r `L{: ..i„,� S1••• ,.c . ..,Y i!'S, •'• ••,• y„ f t' r• ,,,,„, r S�J Y. �` tfS'y��•c:5'�'
�`µ /. . yy,1y .Sr c . v tr.}•1.;,.,:.rJ dt�,'J�lryiy. K• �k )'7 ♦ .} S• .4. i:149
''>�, t'j,Y. •Y'3 t>tA t'1, �, :� '.•;�•••,i•t .j.,�y.% .� ,�• •k,, _ "i 1:%t3':•4r-•.ir jy;a4•44,sd
gel
;'•ri p ,I.:<'y•i' 'fit'?tl iv. ``e.1.;. x.` r;.. • 4.
),lt" n' t; . J ts•.I' >'•t ' 4tr.f.'..4,,•4
7'$ 'i<� tr I„ •*. •
•:14 " f.b.�. ��. �' ,�`'}•J i � •-, <N. ...�a'�i,���� .td,k. �,'`�w ids+`
•twi� ;`ri tM�. j R •rr k ` , {If}F, q, • t.•'• td.,i f"L :r i'l`� - , 1.;•Y'R`•- , 14 tl .4•16 µ .•.1. f.rt,t 57.•.a ":f' r. h.. t '•i ,j,,,J,�'D",.. ,. � r,,,y i!'c tnJ•�',., '�';�;��+"°%r' .,...,,,..,„.„,,,,,,„...,....-:•
f„r �Y y ..r, , l'„ }.> f•�j(��p., : �•it. -. 7 ,yy� r'• f�1, ;ti�.�t •(f r. );, -�w�I '•J. • •• � 't' • '7�> r•//,�� ^G •y, �� 'rt?�J i�y'.��/�t�;' ,Y t.. �\ �!(T,,•!�� � x :'C,r`�r��y1Tl .ir It'4• ��yy%.iKj
•j�'•Y•!t� >'� ,i•:i.,.�l, .es;
y.� 'w:1 Vim �J;r'%dl4 'Ju:"♦ .. ° 'Y )�t , ,,,". .ii� i jeA.,ix.�"`�•`y�.�r"'`ts.+ ��iy."<!: 1'.D ;tip. 'i! . r. * I N e�t� ,4 ,) ,a 1V::::,:..lio„.‘r.:....z........
rit.{ C ,.4'"<c ►` ' lx; tt i -g,. ,�'_ `.-A,•��•'�n�:,•• :•�.rt� � tc6 �(� • •i`. ,��•�ph7..•Y�'sr„�5jr�l�-I• ��!• 4�'' \ t'h, �'.. �.�;�. •1t>~,.��1��,�.r/•Se'��iYi`f,� < • ' Y•S' , •f, • ',t it R f• , •• �r 1 ' �q �,.•rt,f ' • ¢., . Yt; + 1 r y;L. .� 4t itL R b •r„ a �lry rS �ti At C/ ` `tS Cj, '�l^A r>t, rr,f�>;f�yy, �t t '•� �` t •{Y •.`'',•• r1 t • rl , '1'' ',} �S.• I • s"•i+'' phi l•�� V"M, f,Y• rybq-: .. s;�•�. /�• ,7,', •yy,iN •'.' � /w/y' k; • .., •1,y •T �.! ''•�3 -I�� ,.,
ll ,pq, •.'t r• •'T�; ,i, 't ?, `? V .(:,e�.v/-�•-, .r_J..i.l.
' {.L . ''fri: �:�'r•,.5•.(A ''„•' :V'• ° V• •' P' ''9r"• . ' 'i Y. � "f..„ •N�.,,. .wr fi'. a"i4�e f .� r.• _ "••: w.: i- a I• �. - :
`r � �:.,..::w,:••.t,. :.:.:: •.�.. . ..1, '..:—•+n.::. •.. .sa.•-.,.•.•+."r.• -''','.:••.• t'''F• 'n•.J'.•••• 4 4� '.� F gie*.,��"�* , iatG^ �iy
,t'' f 3 r7Cj� t: i ,:� .. ... t,', .;.t;:4.rT..;t•"{- •'y-yap'ti:14• '('it. ,!',* ,`� 'C •• •, . + _.
`r ffii �1[, t f ' •:.. �.�•.,�...,/•-,.....-•••"-^ .•1i►•�`p., 'irk.. '• a1 r„0, � �M •�tt'y ,' 1 1. `, •>f •��,.^Y1.�
7 jVy�r�l���,�('yJ�•�1t' evil:- l� d
•;i�'.;. ,ni" !}'•t-p�1 •.-., � i
•
,....
i' • Mvar "'1",lir. ` *r,. il . r. P44 �fi.�•v!' Tllf- d '.,i• N.At
* x:tif
(.'I:'r • A( iNY� f�}',, �1 { i•'ig: •*.. • r ,�f{.''1 r' . Al,. I� l} ��
kv..Ai •
r ,�, 'y > ,•': 4.47rN��I '*i ..t r• t r it. 1.,: • f +.� 1 ;zn- t., �� t '�� ,../ c
.., ,� +.. t (fir
vI
,,••:.. , !• ... .
•
......•t4fil!' • •....? •,•.,!! : *V. 1 • ,• .r;
.�l ,v. .;.�:;r i• �•e.tr{ •.?�` Y •',�,�rw ! :LPG .i: i`:"J,'•.>p '•' t: ,;,,.'v .� .; •
1•41:4,, °I. i'4 17' -•',' ; • .,
t� ::� + +� „'IIII�� ^ ,g�Y.�,ifY '� t'• l - raj+, ``} ,,i ' : a ' ,^ :,,.
•,,,....1,,
,.,., :.
,{ isle
�i��t{.• .�sir I*1• } t (,A :J° p J1, .t it. • M....5 1 .isleIllkt041,
" 1� t� .",it'02(t ikf , �ij. ' •f'V'• • 'I •1•• ,: • ,• 't"*' ';1"`t-te•i �-. 1 �. `tea.. - },.: • `
'''•::': • j I
41t .r�, '• i ,'•a., 1,,„"a J ... I t , f. i , •• , `#!•'t v1i'.'' ,7rA'�•1 .�, 0 1 * ;2l(11�, N ,; •". ; 1:�:, .J ; +�1; f./c, ;, `• h:;,(t�j.�it7 ,�*I}Y'/ .:)' .�r -•� .,tt. !, �. , r{} •L!' r , � '. . ., tom' r/ .
•
'/ .....4..¢ .�x.IP.... .4....1.elty li,otd_ ..icc. .4 tat Y "t' ' t Id:▪ •'• ••�!tT,-, �" ' Mt.. t'11-.P.L
•t rellie,.71r.jf .'1;..1
1 ta' .i1 i !: ..1a •i /, '�•`'•it.�K' ;jr ' Mr.i'i ►�%j ,., w.. N: t''..' 7x�.4t, i , V ij��•:• , ' . j \ iC:'+": i.t jt :1S' '(• j+j*TitAno
!!((``" •• t. 11.1� '!; t'' �y. r.� •Y` t9i•>t'r, .•,,S Yla.�'t• !!v R.� '� ' •,. . 1; •� L t ,per •
._k.
`? L rr ."rjjR �.�• 'tli�• 1', w. }• '(� It
•+V 'V.y-,. d, V :
!1 w'!t�S;.,Z ,F` � �i lr f' ��� •Z t•- , t..„4 t_ c• r
' �. •,1. 4i . y(G6•�-S_tY�jk"' ,4/f ;�. . ,. A. d b '�"' {ems
•-i-;e '4 'tii•`[,09.-)9♦� '' R� iw':J t. / i, • /� ,. r Ii r i �
-r.: it. 4 •!! r
�i•,f :r: ...
yy�' ,CY► ?� :��W f?•.:,�•••• r�1, �, ••%• t•• ..t ' v, ,:1 i L ,r• ! I. i � r
,1,,'?af_•;:t
n• . . 4e0:t.'y � .y, .r •r , • ) iC,)k Yam;' .' fir: s , •
'• �,. • �,S a� .• 'w{St.{+;''wJ'8'i,f'.�i( ,.; ,.ifk t.,`• •• tf' `y • �, ' �.S►a ,,,! ,� ." .(�IQ!+ �C^ }y,'`''.l , •r. '-� . ,wa ..y,
• r.
,. .. li,s�``♦ y ,•k • ' 1J•', ' •S, �ttfic.,. ,(,'.1.e 1.'Sr• . i I t; t �L, t 6,�' /` r ;t• `? •�•�. •. .,,-s•.-�' tf •�,�.' '... •{'• • S.J ,•f.>> 'y • 1v''1r e,J > ., • .'IT'S /. t '• �•�:
;'i N j ;� 11r = ' , • C', r ,.r ( tit. i : e t!t �J•1 Q, •;f
+r i' �,:r` jtt'.,.. !.• r= S .1; • ✓i P,.• /�• .w 1.-.`,11 , 1• �: •
y���?p •i r q/ 1';Q }
-' ,, `5v' ;t' '• �'-� t ,' ' ¢ fltyl' �•(.f '• C.O. , l ' \ I'X ;i�9' • 116A ��r,•
i• ,� 1 b
.14. i `. • t: ' jt,' ' . �s,0,4 1,4,,,Ai '.,* '1vti r', 'tt •t O./ I/S �1• T ¢ t •, \r ,!!4irsi ,JSt R ''ti 'i �.'t,
r.
♦.. •41.", . . iY' ?'t } ♦A2.' •' .• •'ye, •h. ,,,,'• •.14-� 1 T, j,• ..;•t ,. 7 s\�• r .r 'r'i�y�tl' -{
i'{.l• y� l I,f�21 ♦�[ 1; • ) j,J� t .., o° {' ,,�' ►�• l` .... �i�Gs� �/i• , , ."k t 4 ' rAtl! 011:•/
\ •�p,. may' � '• • 'tF^it•�( .•f�`V •
.` , / 1 kir r • 'f ' A ti ,:Gt• ( e. lR,. i;.;:� •'F:
it • -, i. y 'ri, s` • t• '• ic 1 f
, , ' • `'� F' •. ' • �! �JJ ' it I' 3,.:. r v.'.t 4 '; 1�1':;�{• 1, , ° ; 1 '/. J ► '.v i!j .
•
:ii :),...-
'I• ( •
�+/�.,�ar�+'' r f' fe�• . j;ti'• t• ç
. fj •• ' 'X j'�/~�� 1y", • jJ:",. . J 1-
1, .�., .. S. _11�'t`'.t `'Z :.'• SF Uf/ I'','.? •1.•r\:.�fYJ ..l�k!vlfttic tV:71 4 .1.:1 ki7 '•f"f,': f•.1. f �'{ '1 1..da _
}.t.�y, ..,• ;` J. ;.t-'J,.[7 7 \t'`5r`ia `�. I.Yt�'` ': ',"
11 >�• cA i5�t. ,'r;s' t / •4,,O •j;. [4 'q ' VTR), j } �j"
h.'yl. }•l,'• •r ••,t S. l�'gty .•rf�Y.r i1'•� , .L'' 1+�N 1'}, Y 1 1. G /.
.. .•`•.:4 .4a ;,.. .hd •:'F,'WillG.:f4. ,) }��#4„„,,,rj4ri "ik"74tt, . •0 t V'tfilr. �1+ :IP 1' ��`prat
•.}+t t ,dac s s `i Y at`r•: �t>N,, !, Avg tY. • . 1` kw��••L •c .;1..' i �f _ •
t <� Nftt %, i f,
•
`t S;_e'-'* . ,l 1 t 1 zt'v t -,,,,p • 44,Oer. u t s �':'mf'ti^'•t ••� '. y ..,w ..1.j t,Ac
��;"�` , �,�•,,�^.. ;•!•t ,•/I�� )�a �t tl � ^'t�,q.t 'ks •:Fl �.ti!y`, /� ��l f'�,��7 �'t� �� ..�•. Stl•)• I(` `,
,l. „C,,,. fe, .:j .,`7y 4. 44 a� n .Y .i• J,11 ",a r 1 *. ItS� , ; t •S ,,; .r r•.irke.t.6 , 4
FtL; 1f
" .• >w 1 �• ,7 e` 1{' 4�' {tE11~ '! '� "�}tlr�I.1� } r .. ti+:. ' ! �ff�d
;•t. _ J r j , sin., �t y,, ,l .,"rL»MTt..�1�` ��` tt`frY;:' .1�fNt•R< ,.r4i � t��i("v � t• T r o�,<, .1'•'f M'Sl;�:,jp•. ;!1'�{�•tl h'�Ki �r%.
• it , }�. • ,i +,•
•• ,'< rKl .a.b r''"0.' , y •5d.ti ,•9, '',./k 'i, ,t' 't1 't.�;l i vq,�',t
+'}� �re.: 1.., .„ .,•v • 11• ` r ti • k11 i < t }' 1S•••_`j•_`yy`� "41 • ' 'y 4' 41 .
't=�L+7R ,` .N •; r .'irlH i 1 ,*tkr+i• t/,<• y j • 0. .:,,• iTjr•'.•,• '•• ',V 4. "•2'i1`,1, ,':y.t `G.'r. Vey• J:
��jy . era T 4a ![1pV�r/,�t ,stl',tf•CS��/ .
l• ,°. y�•'• t ('r.t tI� .t. 1*• , •. .• • t 1! •.1 r•tr':,7
•'•
!SV'".i1 4..P 4 �^y 1f'<2 1, -` Sti A``w„e„
iitli • 11143../it o{ t• ^• cil ` a L/
',,Aiyr � ,�f�3 'f 1-� t r. 't ^a
c�' J 4r.eflt �'Fr e:4•� zd..r ,: �N. ,� 1 iy1:�A}.. j .j J i))4 �."r{`1t a V"::.1�'4 Sr Qris.�/-' )�. •'�K ��I kh,„ W ~• • •Y ~4•�q•rr•,'':k,5-0) �N rl, '+ ��I'•tlt 1'S'f}4••j�••`': t �•7 AV •� -.i 9;f.�;.'S ,jJ. t'`"kC�h''�,as' ;•�1
•
i _ Y r }tut�if""rk,�w ••J,.•t, tlX•ii,,.., .1Jk% t'J • ,S1•'I . Ci.,4• , �Sf:ciel: S• ,y .) ,�• A,, .y•.
,, y ,rr 5 ` rl S J n y 3,. t T V ,"t•• 'i1rc �-.
♦ C� �+ .�� � .a �1•✓`r�S Y'Lfv
'� ?'i�,t� 43.1:•o•�t'Frj ^I �• 'l., tf,�,i � :�i' L•: 1'c 1•e.t . �,,�y7�
` !� ra .j�rJ�i{�• '�'A •�` 'I V ( t�1 W ql 44;:kr,.''ett .:';t'
:. , yy7�� v .,1 •�. "4.yr' 5L A •It .r ,, •'�i�l 1t t•. (�! ! t .yt • •
1' 1' 11•' ,9�"~ �,,� " g%�''•
„..9,) 1N4F
t`!)'Sf'' .,•• y. • \ 1: •• y• ' "t ? '11 • , f�� ,t •, .1 k;., +.1 k S• y n'. :�.
h.
• v'S- t fc. 4 att• 4.
W, ,, r'J••i, 'w• {' 4114 , :y l d '�• •,' -` oil fr`
`t••r.0. 1, b el•f k_✓,4 1 ($„ti 17. > • tr�i{ e14/ • 4 ' •t.,1.•• � 1•, •• '�1n,c'v,, S`4 j •^"v:~.(r A•-•, `' -. , ",ite,), 'p (, 7' (fJ� ;4,, 13,: .T P :S • Al^4 ;A hl ;'�hY1 ,1* • .o•`r m
` ., y•A' •, ' f"'. ae„:„.�,4, 3-; "'a 1, v.•'"6i `t d'
—
•0
t{� k , A r(j �}" / 4.7 n t�" <r 3. tj, `'.. At �,,,,�•�"� +i4` tffi'3'Y :i.v' t';i y�+J .t •ti"• ,S E� {,' i F- 7 ! ,,,• ' y l;„, ti,i••jrti<+1}� t A. .7 +P�V u+{ {•7iVr fi'st' 'F, f :'�� ti { 9,'
. c 1�1 1. '-i : •';x, t +� � i +6` J ;)• :lie• r; 7f, crt ' L.,,,,,„,�,.'
fe.-..'.. -'•"A M.f-) ,; jg',f 1' ? t .�AA•d•, "!`t '• :t• • .•! )} S t C I i• tty`AY'4. .?L3.
• ./.� r+` ?,,• i
•.r. .,1 'Y F ' • (�`F ii� 1,Ce.ei,d.k4 i . % t\e ' -v 'i rq lv,..A-fitg,)"� K, }h� 0
• •
�� (L'$•a � T,!t<. r , `E")i• {a }�f rt "''7 J Y'Yi 3yNiti.�t$.0 :ti,�.�„ .:,,,r' ,ISS': • ✓ K(jr4}iT,++ru ^•,•\i ,•I�[}�1 ..,t A ,)' ''. ' t• \ i•f}'f •j4r .F'.';rl'i 0
• ,•7: ,, r S,1•,J \\ . ..s•, N .1.01P ' r. ;!t,i:.'IN,!,'t'. i I•Y�.t Y''r ,,'•�ic litt•r;:i• .9 1 •ka _;.7•.1 0,e .• -.,. ,,l ,,�l ,•' c' ,,- .4i 1 .4 v ...,,,t .;u *N .d..•�>;tr !'A `14.. rp��il� :p...1 • ' .r `�.i;f,•. ll
, . qq• r 'r t j ''W'' , 07l, • 'r''\S'IJ>,;>3 ••••n••11^.,(h 1: r 'lktr,.}tE
i r 7,' 7 , t' y h{1•�r� t h•,;1 ' ti,. Y t• it rS p..ti �•.'t.: Ut • , yr1 e�.< t• J''"f :
1 k- M ,r 41[1a1,;T.:-'v,S{+., '' :1%) .4 t :d , '''•Yt >'3 i �... • •7,� t, „. ,•r
•
r e r ' ANk' a,.�. y. rA , H b .� „ ,. .. . . �,t' • �•. t:•*nf f,'Sa'.. •.,v•i t;'','.,, .,�•
�r .•.�a� J. 1_ .0 ,rtc,� K?rn. • ) ., ',11,:t .l . 4 ',t• .<• ". ''e 'R�i:V%$!„,,, ► f7+'I;r. •;'i- I•. •
:-,r '^ Y'y `CO: '-'vuq,�• ....: .'e t' ,' �U. t i.I1 ,:�A�Oye t+91
74 •'i V<7�i,.c, �.5r1b\" '^.:,
%° .h• :f - Y ,�L'St ��. �xt°5., lI( j t.��.t�'{ jyl: "A. r ,, .k,,�.r *t. ..riA :.�;i1. .,. :
..,kJ .'{ :. I+t•a '4r �4 LL ;, tr, `,1' ;N!',i�' 1 'b��'j?^� t5 �.' f"r. �i;, °t�1 • •
�1° �j�, '�13'•�' ;9'` ,
tq.11�- "'..3.r..% .f r , 'lie'
��t ,-•.< hrkr ,ill. �,;.�.. o
-a i4 �ys i��d'-��,rtr ��. t\ •• �� •�T��••�•• �� tR'4ji' r + " �'N,'Siw.t•iy �r'7• �1rr ''i� ?'.
"'n�. ,• 1:: )d,,"V.. .' r . ", 1r /` •i ,yt .,,, •c,A.Tw h11:1 ^•'`,,, 7'> ..: .,
• .`+. a:2'' ,;.t^• ,,��, ,•ss .• J..;
• '•;t, j;,,` /;, '..r��. 'r` a tP •.,I;" `•
.i"'+�i}'j �,ay %vµ!►`••t t,{��y`e(• °' •!#
F •� ,` tit... ., ,I;. •t y 7 1' C1 'i t '"r.ti:i V1//vt',`�.r�;t :)ji )J;,7•. t } :f1
a.. •-r`:�1' t'.('y7 R, r"'LLS «,:at, rv.y 14 yy p"s•• r'r t +I'j� R� xl 1' , "'•: iJ +;i
IS--
i';t -77 #'K' tr J" ��'_�•' e,+1,;ti' ;fSS L 4- 'r, 1 f' ,,,x +I- 't � r , 7,�'h?r�.k ' 41. Y J /��
+ `n-Kte��}W,,V i. • ' .s .s t+ r. 4y •,'.j1'x.•, ..1 1v ,a �i!' ��✓ ' y.i•u; �. f,):tK.
Alf
+ +i •�G. +11 7 �f tlr.2 e. Y(7 ,V J ,y� f vjL�
„ea"�irw , ' • Q a -.. -ty'A` t it 4�t.x ••---,. . >' r>ki '+ti'i •i, yt;,,
,. 'cr-� '7 y " ' *4•••• ' "�yy aa` tt (�r' ri 147�` r J/{}-' •, Sti > ,� 4,v. , ••y. _
`.L`w:.q. �..e -rk,sP?;• r y'# 11....k. t4,,,p ,, r F 7 � ,•x?'. 'y ;�:,•,. 'r',r! t,,. t, ,,i* 7A'.
• l• `� a ry.. 7,t, t :'•\ ;�1' ,r? 1> •t�` :i•. K r`• r' . u. •„ 7.
� r 1 t
•--1'�/ {� ` � :�.�rj i•F t �'.�' � ,sty, �,z rY ,•8, k,tyg��. •� t1 `yy��� 'e?',,•r�� r o��r�t�-,yf��.4 t .•� `M��rh A '.\
, 7 `14 • r ! i�`� I t, strYg• ' , rC�t���`?j`.i .. • •k K304� �t�t.ytl"..c i �� w, .
:.. i. •, f/ ti'IN , .xr../O f• % '4 r. • .. t•• ,'' air ' ', .'S.f' !, '►a i'� �' ,'q
r`J +•. it" i'.s . Gti i•!„^•'.G 4# , •?.'•..- Iells ,•M,:.f a�,s:.,•�• , ',k'• i•
., a '.>4•4*.... •.'' f.
%,:47 ...4
•
. A J .. :1� • F • V 1
4• / • > v. ` ' � 1•) •. x ,• "t'S•4:'N lr � Y` : ,. 1Joi �M rt� . {.• • k, ?� "' 7rb' , . ,' 1 t� . • L� •``�' • .,',r� y ' {r �K ! � :• t M +� .i, J"• } c ,� .i` , r
40
•
•
•
' -, P} p '• JJ. S S v . 4 Y ,'
'ti y`' -\ :'1a'y� F ,.•` t.•�p,., )p.' ' .<- 4Eaca •r, •li:. It'�" Y�' �� r , rrL • t''k. tY`� 4'j"•g..� �r• ;�' .t �� '
�L 44�w t. Y`�4 `a t ,i`'• %NR: . f�`�, . '.�•.r` ,{r 1. ,,,{ 1. .. , '«" .41^ , Y t. •
t.,c^'.h.•: Ri i�,er.14,,,`W; , "�\ •.• : U
t� t 2 ' ` ';" a.44; . P• ..s"' f.,, �.,0-ri. 7''''-r•rf.�`,Ir yi. t t,•1 •t•.
r p a • `t !kW,*�';,,''� i1 • 4;t\ t_. ,ti.., -tis µ 7;•7. \�_ '�.4, d. act�4,,K , s/v. ,,�i 4l,•x:.,.. •'' •
\ ,itj ;�' 'tea^;;� t;:• f,, r'�l Q,; ':iCr t"y�4•tr t;`Q�tT rl •.�... , 4�)• `�i i"i�t (�,�jctY r{�� R
-\ r 7•off; ' �.� _• • y :-1(LJC.1 �+ "}'„ 4`;t•,,4 t��•'d lh t a IF.,,.kj� r�rt,^"?..441-4,F• Q
.. •� �� -t.:'.r<..,v.1.���°Tt74.:.:04t, Q ' •',:1''1,.,i: *• r,... x ..P`'4 ' ''j•1 lii�•: l u,•t+ 1., .,. •ti:N''�•,• ,•'k n� $ —
CD
,�. �' �,''#'•�'i'i,���t,F,v"t�(( �I�'.`i,��,� d.. • `.1' (.•�.� f ti �•�-'��. x�.�,:t .• •:,,`,.1 ' :1. �`.,c�i "",?4'<`'so,��4 W
°��,err.••"4•"ia`3N T Yr,•"i) ' s: `' 1te , I .t`r'�tk lt•� . ;- ^,,- r K
:r,ti,., r i �4` �7'is .'. M '"7 (.'� i •. Qx�-•'<, `�-1'� '1:.t• <'r. ( • ,��•`rn a�j `
�,yY1e9, y` a ; ,' z'1 9� i- tr • rC'
' fr. i `�''•
it`'r�'0 -t Y.pir''0w`,:'Y.` • 1` „,, �' q, ••4t.!'n'.'., A�•.-vF>,- ,'.-�'Yce .441, �� -~"rL',41'4,
' s y t t:T ti f Stt �•,gr 1:1 x ii t
.f•, ��, .; ift';�i4; S••r• 5t.,?1Ftt; �',j' .,•• r,, ..t..•' t � -1 CY`i 3/4- t.�k` v,'. 'ii f�t; •;.• C, •. 1;rc
,t• . !°� a,,i.P.'•�jriii,f3•{r� orgS tTr•'-�• 4 ••iEv •<•• 'k etc �,:.'��i l• I k' 1 :,' ,r;•... t .. j., a
l.p � s"?:�il� t i zb.'C� '4•M•�tt .... y L :!'��S,t. • ��,r't\tfe �f ;f:��t', i t :'i: � ,-.�.
1. .<d .y�. •i :Sr� c r:.i fe:ta - r• �T��a:,,gr3, evrt,,i 5•���, ••�": j,,':i'r,JA.;f'',•' k: "••_,o .-gzi -.afsLr •f 'ot.-,rt '�.. ii01�.Y,,•/.0 i • t„ •alki.f.• Ott •,. S `•4:, 7• /r ;r. �,{�. t`` •^<�<�]+'k2I k� •`, ,... �,y'A�;a '.r`N'.'.. �, A v ��trS, '`{•,�.`. .!i� ,'':,{. �ei 7�'t,•�,'dF + 7 C . t4 ... . \ 1Zt N,4 - , 4t%� .FN �.kr' , . .P , 6 '�i.: h Q
.mot c b Y 1J 4r -r• kP t at. `�`,tf �' rt., '4 •ri3 i :,�4 y�'� tr �.4 �r ',(' lA..il€, i D ib I�r� - -r�aM� �. 'c• ',+tt3, �° • j `"tv-�+�.�}�•y��' �,• •'��f..fl�'�C�'t,�r��p',,�r�'L.� x�r�t'i�>tI Q
•
rvrr• ! •k .' •: '•yf:�x •1 "Y.,,I, .4,..9 ',i \ '?'I�rrt' .�•/y'7f :;. �F; 0...: 11, ;t�C ,rt,' O
ti.: N gtj[��•*. s r,�. .,•�., y a li�+��r tw irY�._'�"`-f •a , 'W co<'C7f' it ,� CY.
'• ' ,fJ t3t Y"-.k•t xtf '1 s t .• 4" •< .c , t ;:t4ti.�[tt?It �•1.!* • 'i ,t'.. 9
7� 1•r .r�atJ,isis'�•i+'•;�.�F�„z}1 V � • �4� r.1J7 1r; t ,�► .',.' \` ��hrt, �: tt�irjjwTPlb�'��itr,(`�["� i``)• ,��.�
t 7f, .. ` \ �9a 0,!.._',{�,l' ''t+.••. ,, 2< '�,.4' ,, r�''S*i et. , �� •$A4.,%30.1 S.1'• . :..:�!}r-r•;,•r,,o,•• q•:,.
r '� 'l`,+.r"•, ti?�''C1y�'4 ••Y;?i.�,�ji, -:, t �Ihlii 4"iF.! T,,�tr i�j.41n •� ��,,�`5 ;::��•�Nn #f�j;
�, d ,� r !i, , •, e e1 . ,4,f7Q.,c :• li p * �,{ a) �,• e
r f'."4 �� ? 5 r y�,d i'•. r• 'r:C;tiy7ji1 'r 4lCy,'.A tel
g '• Y "rtf y/ er
.•'}�''t;t',S{•�->� S",Ar ti�i1 r5 t)r•�4 c v'<'i'',� 4tt' 4• � <). �1,�It,,��>'7.. M1J�'�r.,t<.,,� frfHl�• 'tj'(�`�. N a� Y 'f
a fi 1 ;G 4 1SdC ffC Lp `"' i / e'.r b• r lil .. ., • } ? •1 t f
Ay*, .io 4 ; J F •r ! c:* r f A.f:i/ ,. • r ',:- '^J..�..jJ •''YY„N1f�11�y�M�1,�'� '1!S1...Vi ff. r. r s '!-4 �•♦ :-A . ..
• ♦••.ss .3tir ltI.'`... aiic9ink )v..�}t.s., t�r f 4 i ..,i w it „ c r Y t••. • •:*ol
• �:. r ttt 7 Y xl u • a ti Wfi:+'y, � � }J• :,Y• , .t u .0N74. 7.,7 .1 a
•',•-t-. ? . r ... •� :t • t, „l..,i v c T,i5 4r t.1 .•-ti " ';y` t .4,: ,t „` .`•c:77,. , • t
.. .. � f� J��F� .T.1i ., 'rc� 'krR�:�l��a!�:!.f.�t •l �"Ttii•• � : '� ��,•.\.,. •�.t✓:+'�• ,
f <
j
,
L x1,4' b;d- [3 G-0,-•70
%•f(2.7-.4 CITY F RENTON
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator
September 19 , 1990
Arthur Hitchings
Bush, Roed and Hitchings, Inc.
2009 Minor Avenue East
Seattle, Washington 98102
RE: Blume Distribution Facility (112-89) - Segregation #2
Dear Mr. Hitchings:
Enclosed please find the approval from the City of Renton
Property Management Division for the proposed segregation of the
above-referenced property.
Please be advised that all previous requirements for development
of the parcel (s) under consideration remain valid following this
segregation.
If you have any questions or would like additional information,
please contact me at 235-2550.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
L nora Blau an
Project Man ger
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631
• • .
1 • . . .
! •• - ' . . . . . .
. • . . -• . .
. .
. . . .
• .
I . . • • •
. . . .
. . • . .
. . ... •..' . . . . . .
. . . .
1 . .. . .. .
.. . • • . .. . •
. • . . .
. . . . .
. . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- i . .. .. . . . . . . .
' •
. .
. .
.. . . .
, • . . . . • .
. . . .
. . .
. • .
- •
. . . .. . .
•... . ., . . . . •. •. •: • . . • . .
. • . .. . . .
. . _ . .
1 . .. .
• . 1 .. . . . . . .
, . . • . • • . • . .
, . . . .
. . ' . . . •
, • • -. . . . . .
. . • • . . .
. . .. . . . • . •
• . ,
. , . • . .. . .
. .. .
1 . . . . •
.. . i•., . ' . . . . . .
. •
•
•
. • . . .
. .' .. . . . . . .
. .
. , . . . . . . .
. . . • • . . .
1 . • . • .. .
. ,.
. .. .
. , . . .
, . . . • . . .
, . . .
, . .
• .
1 •. . .
. . .
. . .
1 ' - . ••, .
SPEED LETTER
, •
TO: 2,, e4/7/,- ,_ g/euten.41,4 DATE: /—/2—9(-2
PROJECT: SA,prie_ _/)/‘s-74:
SUBJECT: Leo _g ,e,,,, ,,
fe • -5-,,y7.7 7• e;4 $4 //Z-g?
,
1/e ",r. ,...... ....
/ 24, -4,_ 7L2L, a/ /,- -7ve-7 c-,.)a/
Al, -izi e2zz_s- C.ee.-1/—4,7 P e_e7.nrm
c
/ 741 .
. .
• I
CI7 e ••/
•
I '•:)17:C• 1 0 0QP,1
.)....,..•
1 .
' ;;-::4.--,y ;,,,,,,'.• •,:;:, ,,,--)! Y
. •
; .
1 ,
(Sand)
•
PARCEL 4-B:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24 IN
SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214. 00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY
MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST;
THENCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 85. 34
FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48
FEET A DISTANCE OF 139. 14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°24'51" EAST ALONG
SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 268 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST
436.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2°33'12" WEST 115. 03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°.37'17" WEST 105.38
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°22'40" WEST
437.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°03 '09" WEST 283 .04 . FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 54°28'10" WEST 490.45 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-
OF-WAY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 1610. 67 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES
MONSTER ROAD, SAID POINT BEING ON. A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF
250.37 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 58°59'44"
EAST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY MARGIN
250 . 58 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND
DESCRIBED IN DEED FILED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8606190933, .RECORDS
OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 48°12 '23" WEST ALONG SAID
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 420.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 9°01'55" EAST ALONG
THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 125 . 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH
46°16'56" EAST ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 17. 69
FEET; THENCE NORTH 4°58'17" WEST 410.23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING, EXCEPT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF A
RAILROAD SPUR EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN AUDITOR' S FILE NO.
5331102. PARCEL CONTAINS 370,561 SQUARE FEET.
TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND
UTILITIES ACROSS THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND
GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST,
W.M. , AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 13,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , ALL IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24, IN
SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST, ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214 . 00 FEET ;TO THE WESTERLY
MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND
NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST, ALONG
1
PARCEL 4-B CONT'D
SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 85.34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 256 . 48 FEET AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
139 . 14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°24 ' 51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY
MARGIN 268. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 02°33'12" WEST 115. 03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34"
WEST 95. 47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°37'17" WEST 90. 38 FEET TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°22'40" WEST 888. 05 FEET
TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST AS CONVEYED
TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8702100643,
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 88°03'09" WEST ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY MARGIN 30 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22 '40" EAST 470. 00
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 °35 ' 10" WEST 29 . 15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
01°22 '40" EAST 40. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20°25'25" WEST 26.92
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22 '40" EAST 40 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
29°35'10" WEST 29. 15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22'40" EAST 72 . 00
FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °37 '20" EAST 39 . 99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
01°22 '40" EAST 190.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°37'20" EAST 30. 00
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
���j°""may`"•- BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
ti • / RENTON, WASHINGTON
4,0 I H,i�� �j BRH JOB NO. 89219 .06
SEPTEMBER 4, 1990
41 z ALH/ENG. 40
ISTER ,t
IHtiD S
•
[[4% ` CITY JF RENTON
mell
Finance Department
Earl Clymer, Mayor
September 18, 1990
Bruce Blume & Company
B & G Renton Partnership
146 N. Canal St., Suite 310
Seattle, WA 98103
ATTENTION: Bruce Blume and Jim Garrison
Dear Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find a copy of recorded document #9006210681, Wetlands Covenant and
Easement, regarding the Blume Distribution/Eland Center Project, File No. SA-112-89.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
u4‘..4142lAta
Marilyn J/Wrsen, CMC
City Clerk
235-2502
MJP:rjs
Enclosure
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055
%0 tatE CITY OF RENTON
>
Finance Department
Earl Clymer, Mayor
September 18, 1990
Eland Building Limited Partnership
c/o Sid Eland, Inc.
6000 Sixth Avenue South
P. O. Box 80187
Seattle, WA 98108
ATTENTION: Sid Eland, Jr.
Dear Mr. Eland:
Enclosed please find a copy of recorded document #9006210681, Wetlands Covenant and
Easement, regarding the Blume Distribution/Eland Center Project, File No. SA-112-89.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Marilyn J. e en, CMC
City Clerk
235-2502
MJP:rjs
Enclosure
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055
-: )
: CIT _ OF RENTON
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator
September 11, 1990
Bob Fadden
Lance Mueller & Associates
130 Lakeside #250
Seattle, Washington 98122
RE: Alaska Distributors, Oakesdale Avenue, (SA 128-89)
Dear Mr. Fadden:
We are writing in response to your letter of September 5, 1990,
concerning a request to modify the site plan approved by the
Hearing Examiner on August 3 , 1990.
Staff will support the redesign of Phase I and Phase II as
proposed, with the proviso that no activity may occur in the
Phase II area and that portion of the site must be hydroseeded
and/or landscaped to City specifications until construction
begins for the second phase. Additionally, revised plans must be
approved by the Public Works Section and the Building Section
prior to issuance of site preparation permits.
If you have questions, or would like additional information,
please contact me or Lenora Blauman at 235-2550.
erely, /
I
v
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631
__,.
lance mueller
associates PLANNING MOON
architects C1 TY OF PFNTON
SEP - 6 1990
September 5, 1990 ,, -. x
VED
Mr. Donald Erickson
CITY OF RENTON
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS - ORILLA
Dear Don:
Enclosed are marked up copies of sheets Al, C4 and C5 that show
the minimal impacts of changing the phasing on this project.
The proposed Phase II area will be left in a semifinished
condition as previously proposed.
Sheets C4 and C5 show that the drainage collection system will
be located adjacent to the building. The recharge system at the
southwestern corner will be rerouted to provide the same
tributary roof drainage area until Phase II is constructed.
Detention for the area not yet under construction will be
provided under the first phase of construction as previously
done.
I hope this answers any questions you may have had. As you can
see there is virtually no impact on the change in phasing on
this project.
Sincerely,
LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS
Bob Fadden
Associate
BF:lm
cc: Lenora Blauman
Alex Schulman
Linda Hoffman
130 lakeside • suite 280 • seattle,washington 98122 • 206/325-2353 • fax: [206]328-0554
lance mustier ale,osl • senior associates:robert oischswsky,eileen furney
associates:robert fsdden,michael galbraith,richard hamish,robert wells
a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by end under the supervision of registered architects
•
•
/11 APPROXIMATE DISCHARGE
LOCATION OP WETLAND EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY
RECHARGE SYSTEM B.
40' 40' 40' 4
2 CF LIGHT LOOSE 1 E.100_ CB*3 TYPE II-4B- CB*2 TYPEII-4B-
RIPRAP ITYPI W/SOLIO COVER W/SOLID COVER y
BIGFILTRATION SWALEFE•I75 R.E.16,0 I• _ i r / C-S A-
O6S' 3.0' I.0' I.0' 3,63' 0.6 6•CIP.CURB
SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN 190 LF a•450 @ 2•A MIN. LE•11,45(IN/ I,E,+11.20IIN)
6 79
NEW IOC UTILITY !'ITnI I.E.•II.3S POUT) I E.•I I.10(OUT I6.5'
EASEMENT "S r
// 16.73' HEAVY DUTY 2
\� S8R'29'29•E _ 4 1204.25' r- 74 264K SDI r 1542 / PAVEMENT C•5 C-2
•
---- �0 -2.__,.... - --_- _ _4_ •FO -.. .=_ ,_=,,, -_ TS LF 24•15D IL I' J1
• - ` ` INLETS TYPE 12-C\M O ®020K 3 3
G.E•11A2 90 SO LF 214'45D
INLET 09 TYPE MC 011E7•7 TYPE MC I.E.•Il.3010UT1 CAST RAN 12'}PIPE
, G.E,•15.42 G,E.•15,42 ' •� @0.2Y.1 I FRAME AND
- ®u LE.•17.30IAUT) LE,•13.30 awn ` ti 4 ! ' I GRATE
--_ 1 �.0 1K Y ® N \% C-51C-5 v 60'
7 PRECABT INLET 13.10'
>_ 200LF 24-0 SO•0,20K m•- 200LF 24J-1 SD 00 20'R j I I TYPE!Y-[ v I�-
�- - ( OUTLET 24/S0 2'-6- -
\/F-�i '.\o '- / CB46 TYPE II•48', c. CB�4 TYPE II-48- 2CY HEAVY 9.93'I 1 /
IQ CB eB TYPE II4B•'..i..`;. .'Q�.. W/SOL10 COVER: wdOL10 COVER.:
'DOSE RIPRAP TYPICAL"'WISOLID COVER � R.E�17 95r - .-R.E•IT,95 ' .¢';
_ ,-- _ R.E�]T.95 LE+'J2.22 YJNi LE:•IIJ211N1'. ( I BIOSWALE INLET
IL 2.724W]' _ hE�12.t2.(0UT1` LE.•11.62f0UT( 1
I E.•t2.621DUTi - I I- SECTION 2 -
,'A RD ICOi--.e•R0. _,9 R0 _CA .. RD f / 7 Q-.. - - -- FACE OF BLDG. N.T.S.N, C-51.-5
WETLAND, �� Rt �( HI
iO EXISTING 20' 115-3"(MAR]
RECHARGE• NOTE' UTILITY EASEMENT VARIES' 1
SYSTEM \ - DOWNSPOUTS SHALL BE ICOR br MH KI TYPE 65' _ {T_ _ 4d _ 40' 40'
TIGHT LINED TO ROOF DRAIN. FLOW R,STRT
-L ( I ROADWAY/PARKING 7• 6PRWG6RDOK CREEK SPRINGBRoOK CREEK SPRIHG9TOOK CREEK'
,RUNOFF FgOM'•., CONNECT ROOF DRAINS TO CB'S I
.ROOF TOP AREA, AS SHOWN. nr OVERFLL. EL.155 21'-6' 20=6- 5" GREENBELT EXISTING DRAINAGE GREENBELT
TYPICALIMBCof. _ j PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT DITCH.DISTRICT NO.1 PEDESTRIAN •
-O DIVERTED
1TE'1 TO BE CUgB CUT51 k E.'16 ] DESIGN
R/W EASEMENT
•DIVERTED T0, I f I -
EXISTING WET,, I� »l ,• 04•- DESIGN w.S.1
p - - 45LF 2•-e G045 _ 16,75'100 TR.FLOOD
v LAND AREA TO .1 160 CONTROL /^`
C] m THE NORTH:.F 'STRUCTuRE� 1 ISO'10YR FLOOD-_\�_ • ,
r THE SUBJECT ^ I I E 9 T' - O5� 51C-5'
IN SITE. / 3\ ri- , -. �I /
y (ON PROPE-n TIES C-�-5 J, .-0.-�_:•' FINISH EA GRADE-- ,....3_ G,5°� I o•5_ -- /
OWNED BY ul DEBRIS 84RR1ER ON /
GLACIER PARK 1 _. S_po_ BEVELED ENO.SEE
m AND '-CITY F.F, ELEV.=22,E 5' - ' 3cr EAVY SEE LED DWG No.1�' ��0�0 9'� i/
OF RENTON) • :f no45K ---
TOP OF SLAB(AVERAGE' •
i 01 LOOSE I RIPNAP
Z - '• • I I II II E DETENTION POND/ /
13 •
��1AC�� E i ; - .5'MJN B17TTOM w10TN BIOflLTgpT10tJ SWALE
/` SECTION n
= L DETENTI POND/
�i • BIOFILTR TION SwAIE
. ®�• SCALE•HORIZ. 1••20 C-515-5
,LYE VERT 1••10'
' _ • FLO.V RESTRICTDR/OIL POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE,
TEE TYPE DRAWING,SEE KING COUNTY ROAD EL 165
' --- [�•,V 1 ti_.t,'O STANDARD DRAWING NUMBER 52 --EMERGENCY
,` r �y„, �YS po� f �, 2CY HEAVY OVERFLOW TY(i!P 1 j' 1� L00 RIPRAP -\ •
E- 14 i45 SPILLWAT EL.I5.5
•2'MIN- MA WS
/ 8�grr �s ^g ��F""//�� 'gyp `` 1 OUT :0:.
39 1 i/IE.IEL 2S•
I I IC• CE
•
d -55LF
r AA
200 LF WO SD@O.257. 53 LF 18"9 SD A05BK J 1, /a ICI A. PLAN VIEW
cc 00 LF WA SD IL 0.33K� �L 9,�
_ I� •,RD RO .v' /" a '_`�. t:^•. '� RD REMOVABLE -_ -0 , L\v`�`
q 65 LF IB"0 SD EL 99I�
'.,, -'\ • -`: t - ••:/ --� :-22. -I. E ICI Y. wpTERTIGHT V_-=32- _ F 4 CAUPLING�� F EL 9.90 pA`\�� _f�0
V44
i -
-'"-- NBB'29'29 W�120I.5B' / =i°_--z' T I SPRINGBROOKCREEKGRE'eNB-eLT •�.I EL B.O IT ��N(`�O �.
CB 422 TYPEII CB N21 TYPE a CB K2o TYPE II I CB 415 TYPE A•Jce CB*.TYPE II I I PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT ___ _v \` gg®
-01 756"a ORIFICE
EXISTING 10' 20.8 W/SOLID COVER w/SOLJO COVER ^ i' 1
G.E•14 B G.E.•20.8 R E
I,E. .20IO30 N) UTILITY EASEMENT 1.E.•13.70(IN/ I.E.•12.90 NNE G.E.•215 R.E•I8.60 1 �•--SPRINGBROOKCREEK PLATE WITH ` --•� / EL.60
(\\\\ I.E.•I42010UT) ICE•Il 6010UT1 I.E.•12.B0(OUT) ICE•1293NN 121 I.E.•II.58(OU 1 j/ ORIFICE �6"MA%/
`ID'LANDSCAPE BERM ON LOT J13 0 40 BO I E •l2•+SIW IB 1 E =II SB fOUT) I ��
I,E•12.33(OUT) ,�d
NOTE' ® ELBOW DETAIL ELEVATION- ��� p t V� '
REFER TO SHEET C-2 AND C-3 FOR LOCATING SCALE IN FEETeiL, tt�`YY
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. FLOW RESTRICTOR/OIL POLLUTION
PLAN 0 : CONTROL STRUCTURE
C-I C-5 N.T.S. c-5 C-5
1• •,•• DRAWN BY _DATE'SCALE
ll'•�� RRT 5-2590 AS SHOWN �s �� ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS COMPANY I SHEET
G/zoo HEARING E%AMI/JERS REPORT ei.A�spy„1)\ ESIGNED By .0R2: 1�
�G.C2/90 LMB MW5 DM 5 ADD WETLAND RECHARGE `0YSTEM 'd /y1'^1r HECKEDBY VERY: GRADING/DRAINAGE PLAN C-5
_�Ri.'25/90 5UBMITTED FOR BLDG.PERMIT 58F'.�.../•,,l MWS 5-2•3.90 Consulting englnee0
3.rz90 SUOMITTED FOR SREP REVIEW 33h APPROVED BY JOB NO. seOBle/portIand/IOsang0les (EAST)
NO. DATE BT CHD. APPR. REVISION �.. .- DOS 5-25-90 88904
•
i��G GENERAL NOTES
I.
1- T ,u
�i. 111411
i m� ..sr L
a'wit
t 5`. - >7 w.rs suer® � ^PMO ter.. • III C I-IIDCAPPED PKt'G SIGN OCOCRTE I-1ANDICAPPED RAW __ POLE BASE DETAL CU8 DETAL wc. se r e
arsrre n.s 57 Yi-
C 5 WALK DETAL K' a7 S.
•FYKiINCe 1..lC1..... W 91G- .7.4 2,2 4.2. I.•1 A
i I • .F,,,,,EJ W wEil. pv ^EC FhT ij
4 0076 w a.ni. R,ng I 4 0.yg L 1 •
I FJNWiOF. .SH1 TG- ?'1.7rJ'1 S.L. .roaG•,,,c.iwv CE7NNEJ WEiwpf- 57•'1%1 47- I tin,
a rIJ W.ou.R MIFt[S 'Nr o,.x v[-¢ I :bpl k iiu,-24 4
11 - a �� _ _.i—]✓rfOyiCWJ. •
bI,f,. JW LwPYff4
---i-- FNC Ly.9.-�� -7J,@S•c F. LGI sic.
rt - ems@-ar--- _ _— W?cvt5•ILU.. t,M r� ____.-L...__ FNf.NFNi
•
�i7/7•/%i77r/7"7 /:'.aT�K /•----- .�av ./`-,- .-.,� _=3e.•'g`- --i--i..., 17;,e17s. •_______ ui.w rwNGaw •
r d w-I'rt
. i1::l11 '401 ., 11111:, 111 . III . ili , I : I11j • 11111 l; ! iI, •
,., ; , I• I! I;, 1111 H' ' I ' ll!I�I 1 o Q i
•
.I m (:/ ,
It.-Ir„I III
par
77 va 2 'sOE:NECY -
I =.I1 RFGFNW{ SUvlcc p 1-.- \``�,, •
)
I.I',MItIMI •.\•`�a
•
_ it - I - NI — ' w✓•.X-� _ _ .
I % .- o
Z
,I '
_ [n=,L
_ .[tea — ..
_
Cr
• °iCO
• I _ i u)
F--713,.. , I
-� ° I o
..:i,at,c- r .,=•yam �I m: I .7 _ o
1 „III, j 1\ • r �• ' a
of Yi.,—:s \ 1 F C
• �-.,
_ _...
_ _
,5- / .C.. -7'. . — __..-..-_. ! ,
i / i�� I - Q -
rJ _„
L_" — we u __ 1 • �\
cam?�`i,�iv: ��`<._ -s • �....•._=r_.- _, _ 1j-�,--- ii.', i �`fJ s`
•
4 . \ I _;mac• ,—.� . :� a1\�
1 �e
�- ..> • '+>'SP[°raSRwt 21;— I ^�
>:.. Ci SITE P L A N !�N -'�+moo. - '�ct»rt.7c osta _ ��® ®II
J,��
LI • CR.Brt Sfn767C5 auL:..t. tvu-cn•, ' o `(
7 SD MI
50,
\, s�n•o• .m .. em - - - _ .m•..av �ue'ss.,ir.us .4::ei6�• 0 "' $ y'�9
a t " ....a°.,. - . .o e..m r v SW... .n s,,° F-Su,an.onwr aFJ.. <0 0
•
�■ qq.``I o I �,I,d ����,° c.���..r. a quo• is;sr� a E
�aic -E 1 1• 1 1 5i1=i 1 �• "�•'SSA- SULK N L w,01ut• PI _
J G (e�.i
r,l.P. �' -� msys o,m- :+t l G2...r„la �,='°'-' --
6�T- CU7d DETAL ®,SECTION TI-RU ISLAND w
•
•
•
tr, LEGEND' NOTESCB CATCH BASIN 1. •fir-Imt utr mesTtXTICa a DMA.. inwln II. Sttn..n Neu Pat La P^Io-tted within 10 feet n IUaPitrtf hlr 4[ilt¢ 1CC SI NO vita lire AlI DPP PIP,P 15 Net
G.E. GRATE ELEVATION NI MT CI RIME DINandl f Cr NLIC SINN,00. Iti w tee.r wry
-_ tanen.
e8013 TYPE 2 I.E. INVERT ELEVATION 12, all...in grate Nell b*Anne]e]DAD test
NEW le W/02 WATER GOLF 12'/SD UT r 12'e!D RD ROOF DRAIN 2. all aw[I.e11P Nall be In .ccareee site w M.Pe-..1e.e1.
UTILITY SEPARATOR B10FIL N SCALE e+tnt Witten al•Staneed IPecitaPtie.lee toed,
c�'.. EASEMENT G.E.•200 (P 0.40% I.E.10.0 2 CF LIGHT LOOSE SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN •N.epe w wnlci�l CwervcllpY Irap..ed
I.E.•17010UT1 /y, ,RIPRAP'TEE)
(/ MN MANHOLE W u .Ices Relic Verb inaiatl� ¢. �'^Ill craeel�Nry mein f0i t11 rr
- S BB•29' 92 E 1204.25 _ I ...a,Pua q w City ar Nmtm 0wreeae ee.Il n,. 1 Pt
r N.ate ear Rene Dept et Pie Parts. 0es,
. � e• '- -- --- �P---- • e�lBLF 12'1 SO "kr. SD STORM DRAIN Eng..,
4 , / ` 1 alai tier. gnl x ) i
_ I __ Lei lei f 12.•SDI*d.SO} \.tom Gs
'eF ®0.10% �'t i 3' the
Norm
drain..me.Nendte Nall
biro m tnet� u. area ter erP1m�ec[le�of reads.altNee.•Hen
\.:' 1r __■ ]Ill CB 612 TYPE I INLET•II TYPES{ CB■10 TYPE IIi8. LF LINEAR FEET
t-I I` C f ! DJ G.E!IA2 G.E.15.12 W/SOLID COVER the esp..pin Hill were..sire eesleiu.OP regrind,
W Ned,Nell 1 scant tract DIN.e•
�a 2t -C sP CLEANOUT .n.will rewire rem•pent ON of 1 lag an En follow.
RD LE•16.]NM I.E.•13.30(Wi1 R.E•IL 95 the[It.of Renton Deportment al NGlie Vora,Design epainrtleec a•-e•/40 ri wean;RM.rca/300-
I.E.•16.2 MUT/ I.E.•13.22 IINI DP DRAIN PIPE CO ...rear a store water utility, .Pan.:NS-2•Nav103•20:peas..
a �t, j I.E.•13.12(OUT) .}y '
IA _ - - j ;-. - • �� \l(�r \.. 200 LF IB'4\;-•
• 'DO YD YARD DRAIN. a. .•nee.erfetw[e•ppmed plane a[b m w ion On N. All NM....Ps foot.tra.Nall b -___ _ _,
a \!�■� -' a I.In prWrn.. peened to •tea Min. n�1ee, less •
I% t% • -RO c matte Pp the Dept.al...Ha earn.
er Men sir Utility. in ccur.ly•simian
'. • 3. btu shell b otherslee.Need b [nalLa alit bei d this drain.
ha
' �• I i \� f� F.F.ELEV.•22.65' _ - - _ Cial wa r M.a DePrN<•eent dltti.l tc ear•. Reference sill bS.M. . CItI, etgn Nan
I on eleti.a are rated P[N nisi•.le cmplrtlea�
.\1 - \Q _' R. All a[°to clew.m fcllltie• s b n. iL N, sl.sir cei. then•nett A the
-r-/ 'RO-�. - .' ---y1 ��� _ -ADS and prior to cln^i.•to ily maintain.
taint.11 airy al Nail Pas if Pt .ilea i.a•.r e w
91, \ and•t west re utl•Icaorilf �Innired .alit mall.leant mllp[IP eWn IiNil,ty cesvcted
�� c I rl/.a/ CO �lim in N.M.etl la potential for en sIN.ton nr1c. etmlti P. Beth,. the
_ t'; site erosion N.Posed. City a M.aw e.mleW.ler to
_p�1 N I.rttim.re rat
W N ' b♦ ' pen.NtA epetrtetlu.t�tMa ant
Ti _ j �% M1 I% JI 7. GI r e[IWdetetim trait,'eat he installed
_! p��/1)�pp��Iro� zzI acti yells a o,•ticn O Cy. 'IT. Nall b moan.l• Ic prow..
~' n V�},__ 1' 230 Deportee.al Public wns,St.rear'In r utility. in
sa quid, mete .slue. p^atteti.e
/NN-I
1 '� •�""� 1 d l I .161,en R.d N.h. al to.action a i
N ' I,-14 \�I - e. en b welt.by lnd^os.di.• N. re. e Protect p^ap.^n In arrest.efth w ale..
III• 1/ t/L� 21 ab o •r b e Dry.l Renton N.M.pled `r W come.V.shall;N mt., ire v.��aid.the
•y,/�/ ��w��^, b breeled .�.l a ON w Internet t roue
h.I� NEW 20'UTILITY EASEMENT - (�L+GA�'E.t�d'j •�'-c�AO /� D Sects,ear UN MY. Olen t e Halt ear•• e•b.errflc Engsnre� at the controlON 1
a• iI '''',•,
^•� I TO PUGET SOUND POWER BLIGHT CO. / r �6�viE [w approve. n %cia .., all ant ve ai tu4 s.,and.
Swears)
14
•fit_ �D-2 I ��-r CJ V �J '^ i• p. w .M .[m b lad P . Irmeba.I:DL23.i' sal.
'm ••-I , t^f\11 tGE 210 VV 0 mama a.. with IS. e . r
W. • . t' I6Tlli 1 \t iB6 Ott+ I I 11 E.ILO F.F. E V. 22.65' W Panel a twhea• aarg Spec " for i .a o. of Washing. Peoject Mdpe me.
lmalm bona MI
Kai.l•pe�ntlta
ZI 3 • 21 $ , TOP SEA.'AVERAGE! 12��G� w ac snail tap of tthe hen l m .9 SIM mei ina..N•.a_n.,. e_.a .-_p '
W � h�y• I TO•1 w ea rrrrr 1 as h�rlln as P l to nil tercet.
/�
' ."� �\ '•-��yh GE iBO N Iteneth f.e1 a•1 place.,'^,III po .more•Part• ��
Q `` .E•i i4_ II7' `n \ C e a v.telaoq be hl p.P be..
EXIST.CB o L•.' 1 \a.� ,,I fit.•\ \ STU .` `• 1 \ \\\\ at Pm CNN arch •CT. i n the caption f pee .
Int•
CURE' - E '� �``..�, po.'Oa 6•• 1i111 I E\1 74• \ , .\�-\ 2 vieSEm S..P.0•1 W smatter.e,1 aspect..e aei
othern-ae Der RTH.O E - •01 \in, I? "\iWE`TN2SYST \N;•. anal,po• eel erd D•ts„-ro.tK.h••••e1 anon..
B•PVCNTTOJ A `� ---000-MMMM��ll \ ..c.pP.
ILI
TT. olcm ad alums.Mel Ned lot
J n .I , OFF-FROM'ROOF'TOP'AREA�------ -- - \ - - �. . alp•= .e•.plat treas. •
Q '• � / (I 7' IRO[TO BE DIVERTED N o.sett.Inside all Past..
w; ''''' EXISTING WETLAND AS r e' ,
W f'/ tg HOWN.. \ \ LIii6 Locy1105J O 2ILi
Q • I/ �% 1'A \! Cv LIGHT \ '. - rX ee��L1/!•1 4. fd) °eriepl
O I; 00SE RIPRAP^. '�' 15 .try N./6^� 2 int 3.r.ar.ea 2e.rcn •man
y I \ \ G•I 13-ER i e i.el a cm S.rno3 n.a. ii..tv.
ROCKERY O/ ; \.V 235 LF B'O RO�,; 1.=-E• �I Btet IS axon 9.eana 2-.tan yy���^pp��1e1`5ION
.•EIGHT ) __:F DRAIN:ORNSPOUTS SHALL 9E '�_� 1 .�lL'�IL.IG IJ V
VARIES - 1,60 -r �//:0-\\\\\\} ^_wT LINE)"J 900E DRAIN. 1.-,, Fit-A C 47
�� EXISTING\ AFl46 LF 12\SO`�\\0 _•y --''NECT ROOF DRAINS To[B'S AS O / 20Gc FA(^)G� ▪ __ r r rry OF R�1dEO�
' ^\C30aOY. \ ., 5-OWN. O , --IT V
10'UTILITY 't 1 :V :� r% ii , - 0'MIN.THICKNESS O
C-4 C•4 R= - RD Q: - A°-Z'QUARRY SPACES • 6 199
r EASEMENT) 2. RO--• - ;- _ •
t - >;145 LF IZeSD 6`040% C" %" 200 LF 12.0!D _2-S Op0Y 200 LF IB-000.22•A-. ..-.2,-.: Q to HINU$ WASNFA ROCK
EXISTING -- DEP'H( ) C / env?
WETLANDS TO ,J. ���- - ----- I- 22 OASE d >I 16J'
BE MAINTAINED N 88.29'29°W 120:.SB' I 0 ie-
REFER TO / \ / ie/r JL '-- , IT+'try-�'t7
l- CO VNECT ROCKERY DRAIN pIPE EX STING WfTLA1.7 _ }. •$I ,;AN, 1 E.
({ y
SHEET L-I• Y TO cB•sea -� p�iP`t M`DA fllbQop
10'LANDSCAPE BEAN TO PJE 2NHANGED _ y.•�'
• ICB•1_ TYPE I CS 425*TYPE 1 CB•24 TYPES C E•23 TYPE¢ ON LOT w4 --FILTER FABRIC 1�9[-J•E"
• •EPIC WATER I.E.16. G E.•20 B 0 40 RO I.E•20 B - - 1�,,,...•\..
SEPARATOR I.E.•16.82 IINI I.E.•I6.1/(IN/ ® LE•15.24 (IN) - 6°PERF.PIPE
• ' G E•20.0 I.E.•1672(0UT) I.E.•16.00(OUTI SCALE IN FEET I E-•14.74 (OUT)
1 E.•17.0 IOUT1
it
PLAN Al •
D_I C_4 L
ROCKERY
' 1 N.T.S. c 4 -4 '
• f DRAWN BY DATE I SCALE
f a'J� .°•c T S-2'_90 A9 SHOWN k ff SHEET
_ "t DESIGNEDer HOPZ: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS COMPANY
� zr17o NEARING EXAMINERS REPORT ppp���{{{A��t11 �.rRE _
e'22/5D LMA IMWS DM5 REV15E0 WETLAND REGW ARGE SY7GM 'P1^4 5-25-90 VERY• GRADING/DRAINAGE PLAN C-4 T 1+I1 HECRED■f
525110 I SUBMITTED fOR gLP6 P<_RMI? y-• p
-all •ti ��h^. s 5-2590 eonsWhnq■nginwn
d/.:vo . SUgr,iTTED FD4 5RE PLAN REVIEW C
/r/IAP:NS sr JOB NO. 3.DDI./DDrflanD/lo3 Dlp•I« (WEST)
NO. I DATE BY I CHD. APPR.� REVISION ,•, lI F I =v5 5-255d O9901
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
CITY OF RENTON AUG 2 9 1990
RECEIVED
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 28, 1990
TO: Lenora Blauman, Project Manager
FROM: Mike Dotson, Property Managemfd
Randy Phelps, Survey
SUBJECT: LEGAL REVIEW BLUME DIST. SEGREGATION SA-112-89
We have reviewed the legal and map for the Blume Distribution Segregation and have the
following comment.
* The Bearing as shown on the attached copy is incorrect therefore, the closure is
insufficient.
segregation/blume/mdd
BUS.=--.,``COED & HITCHINGS, INc.
°I_/ \h;!NG DI'J !(C
i
PARCEL 4-B:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24 , TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED , AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24 IN
SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214. 00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY
MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST;
THENCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 85.34
FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256.48
FEET A DISTANCE OF 139 . 14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°24'51" EAST ALONG
SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 268 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST
436.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2°33 ' 12" WEST 115. 03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
70°05'34" WEST 95.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°37'17" WEST 105.38
FEET TO THE TRUE PO OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°22 '40"WEST
437. 90 FEET; HENCE SOUTH 88°03 '09" WEST 283 . 04 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 54°28'10" WEST 490. 45 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF THE
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT-
OF-WAY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 1610. 67 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES
MONSTER ROAD, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF
250.37 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 58°59'44"
EAST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY MARGIN
250 . 58 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND
DESCRIBED IN DEED FILED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8606190933, RECORDS
' OF SAID COUNTY ; THENCE NORTH 48°12 ' 23" WEST ALONG SAID
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 420. 25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 9°01'55" EAST ALONG
THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 125 . 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH
46°16'56" EAST ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 17. 69
FEET; THENCE NORTH 4°58'17" WEST 410.23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING, EXCEPT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF A
RAILROAD SPUR EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN AUDITOR' S FILE NO.
5331102. PARCEL CONTAINS 370, 561 SQUARE FEET.
TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT. TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND
UTILITIES ACROSS THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND
GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST,
W.M. , AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 13 ,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , ALL IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24, IN
SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST, ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214 . 00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY
MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND
NOW KNOWN, AS STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST, ALONG
1
BUS ZOED & HITCHINGS, INC.
PARCEL 4-B CONT'D
SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 85. 34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 256. 48 FEET AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
139 . 14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°24' 51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY
MARGIN 268 . 00 FEET; THENCE. SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 02°33' 12" WEST 115. 03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34"
WEST 95. 47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°37'17" WEST 90. 38 FEET TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°22'40" WEST 888 .05 FEET
TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST AS CONVEYED
TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8702100643,
RECORDS OF SAID . COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 88°02'28" WEST ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY MARGIN 30. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22'40" EAST 470.00
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°35 ' 10" WEST 29 . 15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
01°22 '40" EAST 40. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20°25'25" WEST 26.92
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01° 22 ' 40" EAST 40 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
29°35'10" WEST 29 . 15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH O1°22'40" EAST 72 .00
FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °37 ' 20" EAST 39 . 99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
01°22'40" EAST 190. 76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°37'17" EAST 30. 00
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
,r�y°"yi4'�- BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
vR L HIT�y 16. / RENTON, WASHINGTON
�C�Q of le BRH JOB NO. 89219.06
�• ' !It• ), • AUGUST 14, 1990
#t !� o ALH/ENG. 40
I' ., Z
1 4 G�S7ER�� y�11
V c 'O4f4L
LA+�� Sit)
� I
2
' BUS ROED & HITCHINGS, INC
PARCEL 4-A:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 24 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 24 ; THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH
LINE THEREOF 1, 214 . 00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD
NO. 3 , CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST ALSO KNOWN AS STEEL HILL
ROAD NOW VACATED; THENCE SOUTH 32 °12 ' 33" EAST, ALONG SAID
WESTERLY MARGIN, 85. 47 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 256. 48 FEET, AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
139 . 14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°24 ' 51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY
MARGIN, 268 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436. 55 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 02°33 ' 12" WEST 115. 03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34"
WEST 95 . 47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°37 '17" WEST 105. 38 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 1°22 '40" WEST 179 . 50 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF AN EASEMENT
FOR RAILROAD SPUR LINE AS CONVEYED TO THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST.
PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER
AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 5331102 , RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AND THE TRUE/
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°22 ' 40" WEST 258 . 40 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88°03 '08" WEST 283 . 40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54°28'10"
WEST 482 . 84 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RAILROAD SPUR LINE
EASEMENT; THENCE SOUTH 27°09'57" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 22 .44
FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 365.32
FEET, AND ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RAILROAD SPUR LINE
EASEMENT 857 . 54 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING
241, 997 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND
UTILITIES ACROSS THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND
GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST,
W.M. , AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 13 ,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , ALL IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 13 AND 24, IN
SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, THENCE NORTH 87°26'48" WEST, ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214 . 00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY
MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND
NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 32°29'51" EAST, ALONG
SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 85 . 34 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 256. 48 FEET AND ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN
139 . 14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 °24 ' 51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY
MARGIN 268 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°35'09" WEST 436. 55 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 02°33 ' 12" WEST 115. 03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70°05'34"
WEST 95. 47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°37' 17" WEST 90. 38 FEET TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°22'40" WEST 888. 05 FEET
1
•
IVIRON NOTICE OF
Environ enaT Re iew Oomm,ttee
Renton, Washington m'ttee
1Q Environmental Review Committee
%) has issued a Determination of Non-
igicance-Mitigated for the following
)ct(s)under the authority of the Renton
icipal Code. The following Applicant(s)
FScompleted a mitigation process:
A DISTRIBUTION FACILITY;
e applicant seeks to obtain site plan
proval for a warehouse/office com-
'x, including two structures, parking
service areas,landscaping and rec-
tional amenities. There is a wetland
the site — .99 acre portion is pro-
ed to be filled and the remainder will
e6 enhanced with native vegetation.
project site is vacant and is
'manufacturing park use. The
located at 601 Monster
n regarding this action
lmui.zy Development
'inning Division,
Washingtor
is FIN,
'whir'
BUS,=., 'ZOED & HITCHINGS, INc.
I '
PARCEL 4—A CONT'D
TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST AS CONVEYED
TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8702100643,
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 88°02'28" WEST ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY MARGIN 30. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22'40" EAST470;00
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 °35 '10" WEST 29 . 15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
Ol°22'40" EAST 40. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20° 5'25" WEST 26.92
FEET; THENCE SOUTH O1° 22 ' 40" EAST 40 . 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
29°35'10" WEST 29 . 15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°22'40" EAST 72 .00
FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°37 ' 20" EAST 39 . 99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
O1°22'40" EAST 190.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°37'17" EAST 30. 00
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
��il L, T ,y a RENTON, WASHINGTON
/�� of BRH JOB NO. 89219. 06
! AUGUST 14 , 1990
o ALH/ENG. 40
{
2
`' ' CITA_ -OF RENTON
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator
August 28, 1990
Bob Fadden
Lance Mueller & Associates
130 Lakeside #250
Seattle, Washington 98122
RE: Alaska Distributors, Oakesdale Avenue, (SA 128-89)
Dear Mr. Fadden:
We are writing in response to your letter of August 22 , 1990,
concerning a request to modify the site plan approved by the
Hearing Examiner on August 3 , 1990.
While you state in your letter that there will be no ultimate
modifications to "parking, landscaping or wetlands mitigation" at
full development, it is not clear whether the change to the
phasing will result in any modifications to the above-listed
features, or to any other features (such as the storm drainage
management roof-top collection/dispersal system) in conjunction
with the first phase of development.
In order to evaluate the revised phasing, we will need to have
information which is sufficient to enable us to identify the
nature and scope of any changes to the project. When that
information is received, we will evaluate it to determine whether
the proposed revisions must be submitted to the Hearing Examiner
for action or whether these changes may be reviewed
administratively.
If you have questions, or would like additional information,
please contact me or Lenora Blauman at 235-2550.
erely,
Ax44)/((v
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631
Lf
CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM AUG 2 7 1990
RECEIVED
DATE: August 27, 1990
TO: Lenora Blaumann, Senior Planner
Planning & Technical Services
--r, fROM: Robin Smith, City Clerk's Office
SUBJECT: Recorded Documents Returned from King County
Blume Distribution/Eland Center, SA-112-89
Wetlands Covenant and Easement Recording #9006210681
The attached documents have been recorded with King County and are being returned
to you. Please forward a copy to parties of interest and retain a copy for your file.
Thank you.
CITY OF RENTON
. Io\p
� SEP 0 5 1990
�� CLE LIVED
��'i Y CLERK'S OFFICE
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 27, 1990
TO: Lenora Blaumann, Senior Planner
Planning & Technical Services
FROM: Robin Smith, City Clerk's Office
SUBJECT: Recorded Documents Returned from King County
Blume Distribution/Eland Center, SA-112-89
Wetlands Covenant and Easement Recording #9006210681
The attached documents have been recorded with King County and are being returned
to you. Please forward a copy to parties of interest and retain a copy for your file.
Thank you.
lance mueller
& associates
architects PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
August 22, 1990 AUG 2 3 1990
Mr. Donald Erickson RECENED
Director of Current Planning
CITY OF RENTON
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS
Dear Don:
The Hearing Examiner has approved our project per plans
submitted on June 26, 1990 for a total project of 379,720 s.f.
At this time we wish to phase the project differently than
originally shown. The proposed phasing is based on the attached
plan. Please note that the enclosed drawing shows no site
changes to parking, landscaping or wetlands mitigation.
The approval that we received on August 3, 1990 from the Hearing
Examiner established development criteria and mitigating
measures for the entire project. This change would effect none
of the conditions for approval. It is our opinion that
variations in the phasing of the project is well within the
scope of the approval. At this time we ask that you approve the
revised concept plan P-1 prior to any revisions in building
department submittal.
Thank you for you prompt attention.
Sincerely,
LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS
Bob Fadden
Associate
BF:lm
cc: Alex Schulman
Jan Conklin
Linda Hoffman
encl.
130lekeeide • suite 260 • Seattle,washington 98122 • BOB/325-2553 • fax:(209]329-0864
lance mueller ale,es! • senior associates:robert olschewsky,&leen furney
associates:robert fadden,michael gelbralth,richerd harnlsh,robert wells
a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects
Blume Distribution/Eland Center
D FOR RECORD Nr REQOEsT O '' Fi 1 lo. SA-112-.89...,,,,
OI i!CE!OF THE CITY CLERK „ ,, _ENS,;;,,". . :
H°ram ,,
• RENTON MUNICIPAL BLDG. ( ti
200 MILL AVE. SO. •
RENTON, WA 98055 ..ILl - 'z'L, i
WETLANDS COVENANT AND EASEMENT < ;D
is Wetlands Covenant and Easement is executed this ?�"�
day
of , 1990, by ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a
Was ' gton limited partnership ("Eland") , owner of the real
es a described as Parcel 2 in attached Exhibit A, and by B & G
RE ON PARTNERSHIP, a Washington general partnership ("B & G") ,
owner of the real estate described as Parcel 4 in attached
Exhibit A. Eland and B & G shall be referred to collectively
herein as Grantors.
!
Grantors desire to impose a covenant upon and easement over
j the unimproved areas of Parcel 2 and Parcel 4 for the purposes
described herein and subject to the provisions hereof.
1. Grant of Easement. Grantors hereby grant, for the
- I benefit. of the City of Renton, a nonexclusive easement over and
0 ; across the unimproved areas of Parcel 2 and Parcel 4 for the
CD , purpose of access to .inspect such property to determine whether
nJl certain wetlands located on such property have been properly
maintained and protected by the owners of Parcel 2 and Parcel 4 .
CD1 In no. event shall this easement interfere with the construction,
CPI maintenance or reconstruction of any improvements on Parcel 2 and
. I Parcel 4 . The route of access shall be determined as provided in
! paragraph 4 below.
I
2 . Term. With respect to Parcel 2 , this Covenant shall
continue in effect and shall be binding on Parcel 2 for as long
as the project identified as Building A under project number ECF;
SA-112-89 in the files of the City of Renton, and commonly known
Ias the Eland Building, continues to exist. With respect to
Parcel 4 , this Covenant shall continue in effect and shall be
I binding on Parcel 4 for as long as the project identified as
Building B in the above referenced City of Renton files continues
! to exist.
3 . Easements in Gross. The easements granted herein are
! easements in gross and are personal to the City of Renton,
provided, that the City of Renton shall have the limited right to
assign its rights under these easements to any other governmental
authority having jurisdiction over maintenance and protection of
the wetlands.
4. Exercise of Easement Rights. The City of Renton shall
exercise. easement rights hereunder no more than once each •
I calendar year on each parcel. In the event the City of Renton
de&ireS to enter either Parcel 2 or Parcel 4 for the purpose of
•
c ec3$: ng its easement rights, it shall give such notice as may
—_. t: >---
fril
4 = wry - 1 - �... , I TAX .,
; Kliryi Ca. ii%v91'ds Division
! = >- - `C� �I /;o Depi '
c% J, i /,,,,..-. ."., -- '. .. , ';i. /t I
i 2 = E V ED
qN•,': 'A"" i �,J IW{vU
be reasonable under the circumstances to the then owner of such
parcel. Such owner may designate a route or routes of accessjltor�-•m• �G O , iSIO�v
the wetlands that allow the City of Renton to exercise its ,,„
easement rights in a way that least interferes with such owner's
activities on its parcel.
5. Notices. All notices, requests, demands and other
communications required or permitted under this Covenant shall be
in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given, made and
received when delivered or deposited in the United States mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, to the address as set forth
below:
To Parcel 2 Owner: Eland Building Limited Partnership
c/o Sid Eland, Inc.
6.000 Sixth Avenue South
P.O. Box 80187
j Seattle, Washington 98108
Attn. : Sid Eland, Jr.
To Parcel 4 Owner: B & G Renton Partnership
c/o Bruce Blume & Company
146 North Canal Street, Suite 310
D Seattle, Washington 98103
tJj Attn. : Bruce Blume/Jim Garrison
O
C-NJ To the City of Renton: Community Development Department
City of Renton
CD
I 200 Mill Avenue South
U,i Renton, Washington 98055
Notices shall be sent by certified mail or by personal
delivery, and shall be effective upon deposit in the U.S. mails
if mailed or upon actual receipt if delivered. The notice
addresses above may be changed by giving written notice pursuant
to this section.
6. No Merger. The easement granted hereunder shall not
merge with any other estate or interest in the real property
affected hereby.
7. Successors and Assigns. The benefits and burdens
arising hereunder shall run with Parcel 2 and Parcel 4 and shall
9O/06/21 40681 R
RECD F 1O.O0
- 2 _ RECFEE 2.00
\\
GRSHSL 41 *:12.00
SS
be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and
assigns of Grantors with respect thereto.
DATED: l,/ , 1990.
ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a
Washi gton limited partnership
ita40 gag.iNv6 &,/LP. jai 3
By•T —
B & G RENTON PARTNERSHIP, a Washington
gener partnership
•
•vn
ruce M. Blume
CD Managing General Partner
CNi
CD
CD
STATE OF0.,14.1e
ss.
COUNTY OF cj✓v )
On t s V-<} day of
1990,
before me, the undersigned, a Not y Public in and for the State
of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared
c E5(a4ncL ZQ. , to me known to be the Ada,K �!o NG Cpe
lam- l�ru5fd�+ of - , the
corporation to me known to be the general part er f land
Building Limited Partnership, the limited partnership that
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said
instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
corporation and said limited partnership, for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that the
!;_�,�C•i'fY4FF'arh:TOPI��Yr�
, f� ;„�' rE
3 - AIN. d ti) 1`20
C.":iC_ iEN: L
corporation was authorized to execute the said instrument on
behalf of the limited partnership.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the
day and year first above written.
NOTARY PUBLI in and f r the State
of Washington, residing at
My appointment expires: c/ — (—9 (
STATE OF LOnSk-cc i )
J ) ss.
COUNTY OF(33 '� )
On is 1(-04"— day of , 1990,
before me, the undersigned, a Not'ry Public in and for the State
O of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared
N Bruce M. Blume, to me known to be the managinsgeneral partner of
�pl B & G Renton Partnership, the general partner hip that executed
O the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to
CD ' be the free and voluntary act and deed of said general
CT�
partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on
oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the
day and year first above written.
NOT Y PUBL C in and r the State
of Washington, residi _ at
My appointment expires: 6/ —( 9 (
contain\easement.w5 (6/14/90)
I �S.ia:.avm•-.(.;` 1" m.wv1
rc , .. i. i •tY
4 l
Exhibit A .
PARCEL 2 :
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 24 ,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6, SECTION 13 ,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, ALL IN KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTION 13 AND 24 , IN SAID
TOWNSHIP AND RANGE;
THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 26' 48" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214 . 00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO.
3 , CHARLES MONSTER ROAD' SOUTHWEST AND NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD;
THENCE SOUTH 32 DEGREES 29'51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 85. 34
FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENT .CURVATURE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A
RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ARC OF 31 DEGREES
04' 57" , AN ARC LENGTH 139. 14 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 30 FEET WESTERLY,
PERPENDICULAR TO SAID CENTERLINE OF STEEL HILL ROAD;
THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 24'51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 268 . 00
FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 35'09" WEST 436. 55 FEET;
OD THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 33' 12" WEST 115.03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 05' 34" WEST 95.47 FEET;
CD THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 37' 17" WEST 105. 38 FEET;
CQ THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREES 22'43" WEST 437 .90 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
C� THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 03'09" WEST 283 .04 FEET;
CD THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 28'10" WEST 490.44 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN
OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OF
WAY;
THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 11'33" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 115 . 75
FEET;
THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 411.73 FEET AND ALONG
SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 57.49 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 20 DEGREES 11' 33" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 156 . 01
FEET;
THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 523 . 68 FEET AND ALONG
SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 419. 12 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING
A RADIUS OF 667 .96 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 6 DEGREES
57' 18" WEST;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 102.86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 83 DEGREES 41'02" EAST 60.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 13'19" EAST 47.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD SOUTHWEST, SAID POINT
BEING ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 238.99 FEET, THE RADIUS POINT OF
WHICH BEARS NORTH 17 DEGREES 19'04" EAST;
THENCE NORTH EGREESNG SAID
03'09"VE EASTAND
ALOSOUTHERLY
HSAZD S�ORGIN UTHERLY.3P'IARGIN FEET;
470.93
THENCE N
FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREES 56'51" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 10. 00
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 03'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 26. 53
FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 1 DEGREES 22'43" WEST FROM THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREES 22'43" EAST 450.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
ri cm op a�trro
V E
[31
Page 1 of 2 ,s
LBLDGDMS1J
PT P.CEL 4 :
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTION 13 AND 24 IN SAID
TOWNSHIP AND RANGE;
THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 26'48" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214 . 00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD ::O.
8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST;
THENCE SOUTH 32 DEGREES 29' 51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 85. 34
• FEET;
THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256. 48 FEET A DISTANCE
OF 139. 14 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREES 24 '51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 268 . 00
FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET;
cc THENCE SOUTH 2 DEGREES 33' 12" WEST 115. 03 FEET;
C7 THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 05' 34" WEST 95.47 FEET;
CD THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 37' 17" WEST 105. 38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
Chi BEGINNING;
s,D THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREES 22'43" WEST 437 . 90 FEET;
CD THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 03'09" WEST 283 . 04 FEET;
CCD THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 28' 10" WEST 490.44 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN
OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OF
WAY;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 1610. 67 FEET TO A POINT ON
THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 8, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD, SAID
POINT BEING ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 250. 37 FEET, THE
RADIUS POINT ON WHICH BEARS NORTH 66 DEGREES 59'43" EAST;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY MARGIN 250. 59 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED FILED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER 8606190933 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE NORTH 48 DEGREES 12'23" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 420 . 25
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 9 DEGREES 01'55" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT
125. 00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 46 DEGREES 16'56" EAST ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID
TRACT 17 . 69 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 4 DEGREES 58'17" WEST 410.23 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Ir Cr'Y OF F.E6.TON
V E• •
Page 2 of 2
a.....c6€�if:T , DiViSiON
.7,1GtNAL
CITY OF RENTON
City of Renton JUN .2 0 1990
Planning Division RECEIVED
Community. Development Department fl Y CLERK'S OFFICE
Memorandum
Date: June 20, 1990
To: Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk
From: Lenora Blauman, Planning Division
Subject: Blume Distribution/Eland Center ,/9-
Enclosed please find easements/covenants required by the -
Environmental Review Committee for the above-referenced project.
The materials have been approved as to form by the City Attorney.
I would appreciate your assistance in recording these documents
with King County.
Thank you.
epo
(>04jAi of : 6/210 tee 40,
-
;
0 CITY OF RENTON
Office of the City Attorney
Earl Clymer, Mayor
PLANNING DIVISION
June 19, 1990 CITY OF RENTON
JUN 2 0 1990
TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner RECEWED
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RE: Wetlands Covenant and Easement
Egland Building Limited Partnership and B & G Renton
Partnership
Dear Lenora:
I have reviewed the above-referenced document and the same is
approved as to legal form. Please note that there is no need for
any city signatures on this document.
J. Warren
LJW:as .
cc: Mayor Clymer
A8 .57 : 32 .
Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street Renton, Washington 98057- (206) 255-8678
5A 1 '12'$9
% 0 CITY OF RENTON
Office of the City Attorney
Earl Clymer, Mayor
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
JUL 1 1 1990
July 9, 1990 RECEIVED
TO: Donald K. Erickson, Chief, Current Planning
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RE: Agreement to Waive Protest to Formation of Local
Improvement District - Bruce Blume & Company and Eland
Building Limited Partnership; Hold Harmless Agreement -
Eland Building Limited Partnership
Dear Don:
I have reviewed the above-referenced documents and the same are
' approved as to legal form. I am also attaching the originals of
;both documents to this memo.
Lawrence J. arren
LJW:as.
cc: Mayor Clymer
Jim Hanson
Clint Morgan
A8 .57 : 77
•
Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street-Renton, Washington 98057- (206) 255-8678
}
AGREEMENT TO WAIVE PROTEST TO FORMATION OF
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, Bruce Blume & Company ("Blume") and Eland Building Limited
Partnership, a Washington limited partnership ("Eland") , are the Owners of
certain real property located in the city of Renton, Washington, the legal
description of which is set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") ; and
WHEREAS, the real property owned by Blume and Eland which will be
developed for warehouse uses will have an impact on the need for street
lighting, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, and undergrounding of utility lines
on Oakesdale Avenue S.W. ; and
WHEREAS, as a condition of the Determination of Non-Significance
(Mitigated) issued under City of Renton File No. ECF-112-89, Owners agree
to participate in a local improvement district as authorized by RCW 35.43
for the improvement of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. which improvement may include
street lighting, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, and/or undergrounding of
utility lines as required by the City of Renton Public Works Department
when such local improvement district is formed in the future.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows:
1 . Owners acknowledge that state and city law provide that the City
may require certain real property improvements to be made by Owners as
conditions of, and to mitigate effects of, development, and further
acknowledge that the consideration for this Agreement shall be approval of
development on the Property without requiring Owners to make such
improvements.
2. Owners acknowledge that the City has discussed and plans to form
a local improvement district to improve Oakesdale Avenue S.W. to include
street lighting, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, and/or undergrounding of
utility lines.
3. Owners acknowledge that the Property would be specially
benefitted by the improvement of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. to include street
lighting, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, and/or undergrounding of utility
lines and agree to participate in any local improvement district which is
formed for the purposes of providing such.
4. Owners waive their right to protest the formation of any local
improvement district formed for the purposes set forth in Paragraph 3
above; provided, however, Owners shall retain the right to protest the
following:
1
WPE-13 - 06/11/90
i..
� z
a. The method of assessment;
b. The amount of assessment and special benefit to the
Property; and
c. The boundaries of the local improvement district and the
total amount of the local improvement district cost.
5. This Agreement shall be a covenant running with the land and
shall be filed and recorded in the records of King County, Washington and
shall be binding upon the Owners and subsequent property owners, their
successors, and assigns.
DATED this 3 day of \ , 1990.
OWNERS: BRUCE BLUME & COMPANY
B _
is
AND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
a Washington limited partnership,
By: MONSTER ROAD BUILDING CORP. , a
Washington corporation, its
General Partner
By: W. t,
is
ACCEPTED BY CITY OF RENTON:
By:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Lawrence J. Warren
City Attorney
2
WPE-13 - 06/11/90
•
•
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF lint )
THIS IS CERTIFY that on this J day of , 1990,
before me, the undersigned, a notary public in d he State of
Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, rsonally appea ru-E _ M.
, to me known to be the--t of BRUCE BLUME &
COMPANY, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and
voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes
therein mentioned, and on oath stated that 1&. W a%-- authorized to
execute said instrument on behalf of said corporation.
1 WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and year in this
'certificate first above written.
00
cPv
Nota Public f the St. - of Washington
residing at Z •
My Commission Expires: 9-- 1— `k I
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this 3 R 4 day of 3 u (. y , 1990,
personally appeared S>>o w . F-L L U/ '012. , known to me to be
the PP,c 51 EN i of MONSTER ROAD BUILDING CORP. , General Partner of
ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, the partnership that executed the
within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to
be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership for the uses
and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he w h s
authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of said partnership.
WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and year in this
certificate first above written.
Notary Public for the State of ashington
residing at 576 LEA, Ia)A
My Commission Expires: /?Ar /9'/
3
WPE-13 - 06/11/90
EXHIBIT A
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 24 ,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 6., SECTION 13,
TOWNSHIP '23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, ALL IN KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . •
•
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTION 13 AND 24, IN SAID.
TOWNSHIP AND RANGE;
. THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 26'48" WEST, ALONG THE. NORTH LINE OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO.
3, .CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD;
THENCE-SOUTH 32 DEGREES 29'51" EAST, ALONG SAID. .WESTERLY. MARGIN 85. 34
FEET TO. A POINT :OF TANGENT CURVATURE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A
RADIUS OF 256.48 FEET;
- THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ARC ' OF 31 DEGREES
04'57", AN ARC' LENGTH 13.9.14 FEET TO A POINT WHICH 'IS. 30 FEET WESTERLY,
PERPENDICULAR TO SAID CENTERLINE OF STEEL HILL ROAD;
THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 24'51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 268 .00
FEET; •
THENCE SOUTH 8.8 DEGREES 35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET; •
THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 33' 12" WEST 115,.03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES . 05'34'f WEST 95.47 FEET;
. THENCE .SOUTH .88DEGREES 37'17." WEST 105.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREES 22'43" WEST 437.90 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; -
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 03'09" WEST 283.04 FEET; .
THENCE SOUTH 54. DEGREES 28'100 WEST 490.44. FEET TO. THE EASTERLY MARGIN
OP THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. RIGHT OF
WAY;
THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 11'33" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 115.75
FEET; .
THENCE' ON -A CURVE TO 'THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS. OF 411.73 FEET AND ALONG
SAID. EASTERLY MARGIN 57.49 FEET; .•
.
THENCE NORTH' 20 DEGREES 11' 33" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 156.01
FEET.; .
THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 523.:68 FEET AND ALONG
.SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 419.12 FEET TO A POINT ON ANON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING
A RADIUS OF .667.96. FEET, .THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS. NORTH 6 DEGREES
57'18" WEST; •
' THENCE. EASTERLY .ALONG SAID CURVE 102.86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 883 DEGREES 41'02„ EAST 60.83. FEET;
THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 13'19" EAST- 47.60. FEET TO A' POINT ON THE
• SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD SOUTHWEST, SAID POINT
BEING ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 238.99 FEET. THE RADIUS POINT' OF
WHICH BEARS NORTH 17 DEGREES 19'04" EAST;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHERLY MARGIN 80.36 FEET.;
THENCE NORTH. 8;8 DEGREES 03'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 470.93
FEET-;
' THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREES 56'53." EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 10.0.0 •
FEET; .
THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES' 03'09" EAST .ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN .26.53
FEET .TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 1 DEGRE►S• 22'43" WEST FROM THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; '
THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREES 22'43" EAST 450.00 FEET TO TEE' TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH: ,
-1- '
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,
RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBE:
AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTION 13 AND 24 IN SA:
TOWNSHIP AND, RANGE;
THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 26'48" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF 5A_D
NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214 .00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN of COUNTY RCA:
8 , CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST;THENCE SOUTH 32 DEGREES 29'51" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN a_ :4
FEET;
THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 256 . 48 FEET A DISTANCE
OF 139. 14 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREES 24 '51" FAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 266 . 0C
FEET; .
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 35/09" WEST 436.55 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 2 DEGREES 33''12" WEST 115.03 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 05' 34" WEST 95.47 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 37' 1.7" WEST 105.38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT C.
BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 1 .DEGREES 22'43" WEST 437 .90 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 03' 09" WEST 283. 04 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 28' 10" WEST 490.44 FEET TO THE EASTERLY XXRG+`;
OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGh
WAY;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 1610.67 FEET TO A PC:NT =.
THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTVROAD NO. 8 , CHARLES MONSTER ROAD, SA
POINT BEING ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF- 250.37 FEE:, E
RADIUS POINT ON WHICH BEARS NORTH 66 DEGREES 59'43" EAST; �h
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY MARGIN 250 .59 FEET -• -
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED FILED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER 8606190933 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE NORTH 48 DEGREES 12'23" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 42 . 25.
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 9 DEGREES 01'55" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRAC-
•
125.0.0 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 46 DEGREES 16'56" EAST ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SA::
TRACT 17. 69 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 4 DEGREES 58'17" WEST 410.23. FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
-2-
HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT
This Hold Harmless Agreement is executed this 2S day of Tait
1990, by Eland Building Limited Partnership ("Eland") .
RECITALS
A. Eland is the owner of the real property ("Property") legally
described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference. The Property is part of Blume Distribution Facility
("Project") which is the subject of City of Renton File Nos. ECF-112-89
and SA-112-89 ("Application") .
B. The Application seeks site plan approval of the Project, a
warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking and service
areas, landscaping and recreational amenities.
C. On April 11 , 1990, the Environmental Review Committee of the
City of Renton issued a Revised Determination of Non-Significance -
Mitigated for the Project, which included, inter alia, Condition No. 6
requiring a "Hold Harmless" agreement insuring that the municipality will
not be responsible for any damage occurring to the site or developments
thereupon resulting from flooding on the property.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City of Renton' s issuance of
site preparation/building permits for the Project, Eland agrees as follows:
1 . Hold Harmless. Eland covenants and agrees that it will ,
for the life of the Project, protect, defend and hold the City of Renton
harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages,
costs, charges, liabilities and attorneys' fees arising from any damage
occurring to the site or improvements located on the Property resulting
from flooding on the Property; however, nothing herein shall require Eland
to protect, defend or hold the City of Renton harmless from the
consequences of the City of Renton' s sole negligence or the sole
negligence of any of the City of Renton' s agents or employees.
2. Agreement to Run With the Land. The burden of this
Agreement shall be deemed to run with the land and shall be enforceable
against Eland and its successors and assigns, including, without
1
WPS-113 - 06/11/90
•
limitation, any present and future owners of the Property or any portion
thereof.
ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
a Washington limited partnership,
By: MONSTER ROAD BUILDING CORP. , a
Washington corporation, its
General Partner
By: L-.
is
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on this 3 - ( day of auk , 1990,
personally appeared 51 o w.ELAiuO, )r , to me known to be the PASsi or,j ,r
of MONSTER ROAD BUILDING CORP. , a corporation, to me known to be a general
partner of ELAND BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, the limited partnership
that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the
said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
corporation and said partnership for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that \n . was authorized to execute said
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and year in this
certificate first above written.
ic-,LAAL/ w.
Notary Public for the Stat of Washington -
residing at S&ATLF, 1J4
My Commission Expires: 11-/i-7
2
WPS-113 - 06/11/90
EXHIBIT A
THAT. PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 24 ,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WISLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN ACING COUNTY, •
WASHINGTON AND THE, SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND -GOVERNMENT LOT 60 SECTION 13,
TOWNSHIP -.23. NORTH, . RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE. MERIDIAN, ALL IN KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE. QUARTER. CORNER BETWEEN SECTION 13 AND 24, IN SAID
TOWNSHIP AND RANGE;
THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 26'.48" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
. • NORTHWEST QUARTER 1214.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD NO.
3, CHARLES MONSTER ROAD SOUTHWEST AND NOW KNOWN AS STEEL HILL ROAD;
THENCE SOUTH 32 DEGREES 29'51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 85. 34
FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENT CURVATURE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A
RADIUS. OF 256.48 FEET,' .
-THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG, SAID, CURVE THROUGH AN ARC OF 31 DEGREES .
04'57", AN ARC LENGTH 139.14 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 30 FEET WESTERLY,
PERPENDICULAR TO SAID CENTERLINE OF STEEL HILL ROAD; • .
THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 24'51" EAST, ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 268.00 '
FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 8.8 DEGREES .35'09" WEST 436.55 FEET;
WHENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 33'12" WEST 115.03 FEET; .
THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 0.5'34" WEST 95.47 FEET;
. THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 37'17" WEST 105.38 FEET;
THENCE NORTH. 1 DEGREES 22'43" WEST 4.37.90 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 03'09" WEST 283.04 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 28'10" WEST 490.44. FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN
OP THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD. COMPANY RIGHT OF
WAY;
THENCE. NORTH 28 DEGREES 11'33" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 115.75
FEET;
THENCE• ON A 'CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 411.73 FEET AND ALONG
SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 57.49 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 20 DEGREES 11'33" WEST ALONG, SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 156 .01
FEET;
THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 523.68 FEET AND ALONG
SAID EASTERLY MARGIN. 419.12 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING
A. RADIUS OF 667..96 FEET, •THE RADIUS POINT OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 6 DEGREES
57'18" WEST;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG' SAID CURVE 102.86 FEET;
THENCE NORTH83 DEGREES 41'02" EAST '60.83 FEET;
THENCE' NORTH 74 DEGREES 13'19" EAST• '47.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF CHARLES MONSTER COUNTY ROAD SOUTHWEST, SAID POINT
BEING ON A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 238.99 FEET. THE RADIUS POINT OF
WHICH BEARS NORTH 17 DEGREES 19'04" . EAST;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHERLY MARGIN 80.3.6 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 03'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 470.93
FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREES 56'51" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY' MARGIN. 10.00
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 03'09" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY .MARGIN 2.6.53
FEET. TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 1 DEGREES 22'43" WEST FROM THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREES .22143" EAST 4.50.00 Fizz TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.'
•
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION. 51067
T,y n n r. i n y ,being first duly sworn on oath states
that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the
VALLEY DAILY NEWS _
• Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition
Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers
are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six
months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published
in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King
County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for
King County.
The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition
, Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition , (and not in
supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers
during the below stated period. The annexed notice a n u'a i r.,o a,4(le
•
� I:nvi rnnrnrsntal pet-"�"1LIl
was published on April 16 . 1990
med tor
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the G:ad. is
Sum of$ "'q a 3 !=urther informatiu.
available in the Con
•)artrnent, Current Pi..
nicipal Building, Renton,
i-2550. This Determination: •;L.
/n qa,,//)....ec
� ` ire is a 14 day appeal period . n will
I at 5:00 PM on April 30, 1990. Any i
Deal of this decision may be made to the '
Subscribed and sworn before me this 1 51l-1, day of 1 19 0,n n r,r i r's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Bash-
200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,Wash-
ton. An appeal must state clearly,- in
- :ing,why the Determination should be
• sod and must beaccompanied,by a
1-refundable$75.00 filing fee: .
/ � d Public Notice '
Published in the Valley Daily News April
Ner ry Public for the State of Washington 16, 1990. R4090 Acct: #51067
residing at Auburn, - -- -- - -
King County, Washington
VON#87 Revised 4/89
'1 HeI��J
2 rrC.�FfiI v E
IIUCL .iuN 1930
L'I,UME r
(X)f'IPANS' REA1.ESI'A7"I . 24„ u� vssloN
•
June 14 , 1990
Mr. Don Erickson
Director of Current Planning
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
RE: Sid Eland Distribution Center
Dear Mr. Erickson;
As a result of the hearing examiner' s recommendation to
provide up to . 99 acres of wetlands compensation, "if
possible" , for the . 99 acres of wetlands filled, we have
analyzed our present approved site plan to see how closely we
can meet that requirement. In order to meet the requirement
imposed on us, we will need to add to the existing wetlands
area south of the rail spur track.
Attached you will find the wetland compensation map and
measurements prepared by Bush, Roed & Hitchings depicting the
compensation areas both north and south of the rail spur.
With your written concurrence below we will instruct Shapiro
& Associates to complete the final plan and proceed to
implement the work.
Your earliest response is appreciated.
Si cerely,
-2-)1-1-A ,--1______
Ja es D. Garri on
cc. Lenora Blauman - City of Renton
Bob Fadden - Lance Mueller & Assoc.
Dick Myers - Shapiro & As
Approved Plan Da 1-''te /S -90
Don Erickson ��
e
gol
146 NOIt"I I( ('ANrV,STREET, SUITE 310 SEA"I"I 1.1{, \1'\SIIWGfON 98103 (2061632-1li00 FAX (206)633-468ii ,„....0
AI
4i P .. CITY OF RENTON
Olt
..u. Hearing Examiner
Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J.Kaufman
i
; June 13, 1990 ,
Jim Garrison
Bruce Blume and Company
146 North Canal Street, Suite 310
; Seattle, WA 98103
RE: Blume Distribution Facility
1 File No. SA-112-89
' Dear Mr. Garrison: .
The Examiner' s Report regarding the referenced application which was
published May 29, 1990 has not been appealed within the 14-day period
established by ordinance. As one of the conditions of approval you
are required to submit a Restrictive Covenant on the wetlands. • When
! this document has been prepared with a legal description attached,
signed by all parties and notarized, it should be forwarded to this
' office. We will review the document and submit the legal description
to the Public_ Works Department for verification. When this has been
accomplished we will then forward the matter to the -City Clerk who
; will file the Covenants with King County and retain this file as a
permanent public record of the city.
Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or
( information is required.
Sincerely, ) i .
, .-4--;:j 0 64-./ittej-4)-11,}8"--FRED J. KAUFMAN -- _�( HEARING EXAMINER • �
FJK:dk
cc: J�City Clerk
Building Division
Planning Division
�.... m .. . -- r,___ct _ n,...+.... \I7.,c.L.ir.rrhnn Q9( - (9m1915-9.593
ri
•
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON s )
)ss.
County, of King )
DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn,
upon oath, deposes and states:
That on the �9th day of May . ; 1990 - affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a
' decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of
record in the below entitled application or petition.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this oZq - day
of , 1990.
/! • /AS-40Y\—__
Notary u lic in and for the State of Washington,
residin (' n , therein.
Application, Petition, or Case #: BRUCE BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY - SA-112-89
(The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.)
•
-
May 29, 1990
OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND DECISION
APPLICANT: BRUCE BLUME AND COMPANY
File No: SA-112-89
LOCATION:
601 Monster Road SW
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Ap
proval pproval for a warehouse/office complex on a sixteen acre
portion of a forty acre site, zoned for manufacturing park
use.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: PlanningDivision Recommendation: Ap
proval with
conditions.
I PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the
Examiner on May 8, 1990
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining
available information on file with the application, and
field checking the property and surrounding area, the
Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as
follows:
MINUTES
The hearing was opened on May 15, 1990 at 9:15 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton
Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
The following exhibits were entered into the record:
Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting
and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request.
Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map
Exhibit #3 - Site Plan
I '
Exhibit #4 - Map showing Wetlands on the site.
Exhibit #5 - (a) Landscape Plan; (b) Mylar of Landscape Plan
Exhibit #6 - Elevation Plan
Exhibit #7 - Illustrative Site Plan
I
The above exhibits were entered into the record, followed by a review of the staff report by Senior
Planner, LENORA BLAUMAN. A review of her comments follows.
The applicant wishes to develop a warehouse/office complex on a sixteen acre portion of a forty acre
parcel which is currently undeveloped. The parcel to be developed contains approximately 4.5 acres of
wetlands; parcel Nos. 2 and 4 are to be developed; the site is currently under one ownership with the
possibility of some of the ownership changing hands at a later date. There are currently adequate
utilities to serve the site; improvements will have to be made to water flow capacities to accommodate
fire department service. The applicant wishes to build a warehouse/office complex in one building of
approximately 210,000 square feet located on lot #2. Of that footage 18,000 sq. ft. will be used for
office uses and the remainder will be used for warehouse facilities. Building B, about 50,000 sq. ft.,
currently has no planned tenant and will probably be phased in at a later date; there are approximately
4-1/2 acres of wetlands on the entire site and of the acreage on the 16 acre portion of the site .99 acres
of wetlands is scheduled to be filled. Because the wetlands to be filled are less than one acre the U. S.
Army Corps declined to comment, and an agreement will be obtained from the applicant to be sure no
More than .99 acres of wetland are filled.
Continuing, Ms. Blauman read into the record the mitigated conditions set out by the Environmental
Review Committee (copy attached). In reviewing the site plan she stated the proposal complies with
the Comprehensive Plan policies and goals; each of the elements of the site plan comply collectively and
individually with city requirements, and the two lots share an access easement which will be recorded
Bruce Blume and Company
SA-112-89
May 29, 1990
Page 2
I
and will run for the life of the project. Looking at such issues as traffic, landscaping, aesthetics,
natural land use protection and public services Blauman said staff is pleased with the way the proposal
is beginning to come together to make it more compatible with the surrounding community; the parking
lot needs better lighting and care must be taken to eliminate glare on to the wetland area and
'neighboring roadways; revised signs and their locations will be requested; the site is located in a flood
;plain and a plan must be submitted to ensure all of the water from the site remains on the site, and the
vegetation and wetlands are protected. The windows in the buildings (as well 'as traffic) are oriented
.away from the wetlands; dock loading doors, a walking path and parking are located away from the
wetlands; upland (dry land) landscaping will be compatible with wetland landscaping; surrounding
;property values should improve; and the proposal is similar to other uses in the area.
IMs. Blauman said it is estimated when this site is fully developed there will be approximately 1410
iaverage daily vehicle trips; there is no impact to light and air on the site, and noise and odor concerns
,were addressed. It was noted that the way the buildings are oriented provides employees an
opportunity to be aware of the activities in the wetlands area. There are no problems anticipated by
the Police and Fire Departments; the applicant will be providing active and passive recreation on the
'site and Planner Blauman noted staff's belief that the proposal, with the mitigation measures, will be a
positive impact on the valley. Staff recommends approval of the proposal with the conditions that the
applicant comply with the ERC conditions; provide a revised exterior lighting plan; revised signage
plan; submit final upland landscape plans; install upland landscaping on the site prior to occupancy; the
applicant will develop and improve all wetland areas; provide a landscaping maintenance bond of
$3,000. for the upland area; a bond of $6,000. for the wetlands plantings; and a restrictive covenant
addressing the protection of all of the wetland areas on the entire parcel in the event of segregation
and/or sale of any or all of the property.
Responding for the applicant was JIM GARRISON, Blume and Company, 146 North Canal Street.
Seattle 98103. Addressing the landscape bonds, Mr. Garrison said he felt they may not be necessary as
the entire parcel will be covered with a restrictive covenant which will run for the life of the property,
and therefore the landscaping bond requirements should be removed. Compensation for the wetlands
occurs on the north and south side of the railroad tracks and consists of approximately .55 acres;
additional conifers can be added but Garrison said they may create a safety issue (sight distance) for
the trucks that will be making deliveries to the site. He said the applicant has no objection to the other
recommendations/conditions by staff. Mr. Garrison said ownership on the site will be multiple - parcel
#1 is currently occupied by Container Corporation of America which owns the balance of parcels 2, 3,
and 4. The applicant is purchasing parcels 2, 3, and 4 and the ownership of parcels 2 and 4 will
remain with the applicant with parcel #2 to be sold.
Further responding for the applicant was MARK BOULE, Shapirio and Associates, 1400 Smith Tower,
506 Second Avenue, Seattle 98104, wetlands consultant, presented a review of what has been done on
the site regarding wetlands boundaries and a design for the mitigation plan to offset impacts and
respond to specific concerns by other departments. Mr. Boule said the site is extremely flat and
bounded by higher ground all the way around; there is a natural storm water and percolation system on
the site with virtually no water run-off from the site. Vegetation on the site is primarily canary grass
with a small area of scrub in the northeast portion of the wetlands. Boule continued with a review of
filling being done in the area of the wetlands; described the feeding areas for the herons on the north
of the wetlands; noted plants along the south side of building 'A' will extend to the stream to increase
the edge in the habitat and plantings would be native. He said an additional wetland habitat will be
created south of the railroad spur between the two wetland areas that presently exist - this has been
identified as "creation" of a wetlands but he feels it should be referred to as "restoration" as it is
suspected all of this land, many years ago, was probably wetlands and they are just restoring what was
there previously. He said careful wetlands restoration has proven to be more successful then attempts
to create new wetlands.
Commenting on traffic impacts was CLINT MORGAN. Traffic Engineering Division stating his office
has been working with the applicant as to the access located at the most southerly portion site. It is
felt the concerns of staff are being resolved. Sight distances seem to be sufficient. He said his
department must be provided with a set of revised off-site improvement plans from the applicant.
Final comments from staff were given by Planner Blauman who agreed with the applicant that the
property would have a restrictive covenant on it, and said staff would still recommend that landscaping
bonds be required. She said the applicant was aware of staff's recommendation for additional conifer
trees on the upland portion of the site to create a safe distance and screen the railroad lines and
expressed appreciation for their cooperation in addressing these and other staff concerns..
The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to
speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:15 A.M.
•
•
Bruce Blume and Company
SA-112-89
May 29, 1990
Page 3
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION:
Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The applicant, Bruce Blume and Company, filed a request for approval of a site plan for two
buildings and associated parking.
2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a
Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. The ERC imposed a variety of
mitigation measures, and while they affect the project in a number of ways, they will not be
discussed in this report. (See attached mitigation measures).
4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter.
5. The subject site is located at 601 Monster Road S.W. The site is immediately west of the
Container Corporation complex and was part of that entire legal parcel. Metro's sewage
treatment plant is located east of the site.
6. The subject site was annexed to the city with the adoption of Ordinance 4086, enacted in
September, 1987.
i
7. The site is zoned M-P (Manufacturing Park).
8. The site is served by city water and sewer lines including a twelve inch water line along
Monster Road and a twelve inch sewer line located along Oakesdale Avenue S.W. near the
intersection with Monster Road. Fire flow for the site will need upgrading.
9. Storm drainage is achieved by natural site characteristics which include wetlands and shallow
ponds. (See further wetlands discussion below)
10. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is
located as suitable for the development of manufacturing park/multiple option, but does not
mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan.
11. The applicant proposes developing two parcels of a proposed 4 parcel subdivision. Taking
advantage of an exemption provided by the Subdivision Ordinance, the applicant is segregating
an approximately 41.84 acre parcel into four separate lots. Proposed Lots 2 and 4 would
comprise the subject site. The Container Corporation complex is located on Proposed Lot 1.
Proposed Lot 3 would be vacant. The original parcel is bounded by curving streets and a
railroad line giving it an irregular shape. The parcels are all irregularly shaped with property
lines skewed to step around wetlands areas on the site.
12. Proposed Lot 2, the parcel located at the northwest corner of the site, is approximately 450,002
square feet or 10.33 acres. Building A, an approximately 210,330 square foot building, will be
erected on this parcel. Building A will contain approximately 18,000 square feet of office space
and approximately 192,000 square feet of warehousing divided between two separate uses.
13. Proposed Lot 4 is located immediately south of Lot 2. The parcel is approximately 612,557
square feet in size or approximately 14.06 acres in area. Building B, a 49,100 square foot
warehouse, will be located on Lot 2.
T4. The site contains approximately 4.5 acres of wetlands. The wetlands on this site are
characterized by shallow ponds, marshy areas, wet meadows and upland meadows. Plants
(cattails, rushes, canary grass, etc.) associated with wetlands, as well as specific soils (hydric)
indicative of wetlands, were identified on the site. (See Exhibit #1). A separate area
approximately 1.5 acres in size and related to this wetland is outside the boundaries of the site
and, therefore, beyond the scope of this application.
15. The wetlands straddle the property line between Lots 2 and 4. They are generally located along
the south margin of Lot 2, Building A's lot, and the northwest portion of Lot 4, Building B's
lot. The low profile of the site permits small depressions'and modest rises to provide either
wetlands areas or uplands thereby permitting areas of uplands within the main body of
wetlands, and wetlands outside the main wetland areas. One small area of wetland is located
north of the main wetland on Lot 2, and two small areas are located south of the main area on
Bruce Blume and Company
SA-112-89
May 29, 1990
Page 4
Lot 4. 'An upland "island" and "peninsula" in the main wetland are located near the northwest
corner of Lot 4.
16. The applicant proposes filling some areas of wetland found on the site, enlarging others, and
maintaining the remainder. In all, the applicant proposes filling approximately .99 acres of
wetlands and dedicating approximately .55 acres of uplands to attempt to create additional
wetlands. Wetlands creation is a new science, although expanding a wetland as currently
proposed is easier than creating one in a non-wetland environment. Native wetland plant
species can more easily' colonize an adjacent area than be imported to an area naturally devoid
of wetland species. The applicant presumably chose to limit fill to .99 acres since filling one
acre or more of wetlands triggers special review by the Army Corps of Engineers.
17. The wetland straddles the two parcels potentially complicating management and maintenance of
the wetlands.
18. The ERC imposed a variety of fees to mitigate the estimated 1,410 vehicle trips per. day. Fees
will be applied to the Grady Way Transportation/Benefit District and improvements to the
Empire Way and Monster Road intersection. Off-site improvements will also improve the
right-of-way adjacent to the site.
19. The one-story buildings are separated by more than 120 feet from one another. They have been
designed to minimize glare thereby lessening their impact on the wetlands and migrating birds
and other wildlife. The applicant proposes a picnic area and basketball court. These
recreational amenities will be located on legally separate parcels after the division, and might
not be available to the occupants of the other parcels. The applicant will be adding to the
upland landscaping particularly along the margins of the wetlands.
20. Parking is concentrated along the north and east perimeter of the site,-and between Buildings A
and B, opposite the Container Corporation Building.
1
21. Building A will be approximately 600 feet long by approximately 200 feet wide. The long
east/west facades will have only one minor jog each. The building will be oriented in an
east/west direction along the north margin of the wetland. Its finished floor elevation will be
20 feet to lift it above the 100 year flood zone. There will be a minor rise to the roof as
viewed from the east or west elevations. Similarly, the building will be modestly stepped over
the terrain as viewed from the north or south.
22. Building B is approximately 200 feet long by 160 feet wide. It generally is "L" shaped and is
set at an angle to the east/west axis. It, too, will be set at an elevation above the 100 year flood
plain, at approximately 20 feet. Building B and its lot will be served by an easement across Lot
2.
'23. While the segregation of the entire site was pending during most of staff s''review, the applicant
sited Ithe buildings to comply with the setbacks required of the M-P zone as though the
segregation had been approved. That is, after the parcels are divided, the two buildings
proposed under this site plan review will meet the standards of the M-P zone on each of their
respective lots.
24. Staff has worked with the applicant to increase landscaping along the north perimeter of Lot 2,
the Oakesdale frontage, and along the east margin of Lot 4 which abuts the blank, rail-served
aspect of the Container complex.
-i 25. The buildings will be finished with multi-colored finished concrete, and window and trim
detail. .
26. Storm drainage is intended to recharge the wetlands. It will be carried to the wetlands by
grass-lined swales to filter out contaminants and protect the integrity of the wetlands. The site
will meet 100 year storm, seven day release.rates as required by the Public Works Department.
27. The applicant has not been required to apply for a separate special permit for grade and fill.
•
•
Bruce Blume and Company
• SA-112-89
May 29, 1990
Page 5
CONCLUSIONS
1. The Site Plan Ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those
criteria are generally represented in part by the following .enumeration:
a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan;
b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes;
c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses;
d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself;
e. Conservation of property values;
f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation;
g. Provision of adequate light and air;
h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use;
The proposed use, a's conditioned below, satisfies these and other'particulars of the ordinance.
2. The development of warehousing uses on a well landscaped site is compatible with the
Comprehensive Plan's designation of the site for manufacturing park use. The,open space and
wetlands will complement the goal of creating a park-like atmosphere.
3; The buildings will meet the setback and bulk requirements of the M-P zone. Site Plan review
does not entail a detailed analysis of Building and Fire Code issues. Those matters are reviewed
with building permit application.
4. The development of the subject site should not have any impacts on surrounding properties or
uses. The scale of the buildings is not unlike that found on neighboring properties. Obviously
there will be additional traffic for occupants of nearby properties to contend with, but this
should be offset by the applicant's contribution to the Grady Way Transportation Benefit
District and to the eventual signalization of Monster Road and Empire Way.
5. Th'e requirements imposed by the Public Works Department for storm water retention and
release should avoid displacing storm water onto adjacent properties. While approximately .99
acres of wetlands will be filled, the applicant will excavate approximately .55 acres of wetlands.
Presumably the water retaining capacity of the excavated area will lie equivalent to that lost,in
the filling of the .99 acres.
6. This office is not convinced that the net loss of .44 acres of wetlands should be permitted by
the City. While the capacity of the ponds/wetlands will presumably be equivalent, the surface
area will be reduced nearly half reducinghabitat in , potential open space and possibly altering
biological and physical properties inherent in the larger surface area. There was no attempt to
demonstrate why a loss should be permitted. Therefore, the applicant will have to create .99
acres of wetlands, the amount which will be lost to provide a reasonable building site, unless the
applicant can demonstrate with competent, technical evidence why additional wetlands cannot
be created elsewhere.
7. Since wetland creation is uncertain at best, the appiicant will have to bond the effort so that
any failure can at least be retried over a reasonable period, and to help provide,a reasonable
window to assure that the wetland environment envisioned at this stage has had an opportunity
to establish itself. In addition, the applicant will have to provide assurances that the wetlands
will be maintained during the life of these two proposals.
8. The design of the buildings, their orientation, and the softening landscaping should assist in
minimizing impacts on the site, particularly if the applicant provides compensating wetlands.
The windows and parking areas are located away from the wetlands to minimize glare and
reflection. Reflective,surfaces, particularly, can confuse wildlife and their elimination as a
hazard is fortunate. The "L" shaped building, Building B, set at an angle to the east/west axis,
is more visually interesting than the companion building, Building A. Part of this probably has
to do with size and scale. Building A is a large warehouse structure, although some of the
window facade detail should provide some relief from the long facade.
•
,
Bruce Blume and Company
SA-112-89
May 29, 1990
Page 7
TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of May, 1990 to the parties of record:
Jim Garrison
Bruce Blume and Company
146 North Canal Street, Suite 310
Seattle, WA 98103
Mark Boule
Shaperio and Associates
1400 Smith Tower
506 Second Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of May, 1990 to the following:
Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Public Works Director
Members, Renton Planning Commission Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director
Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Ronald Nelson, Building Director
Transportation Systems Division Mayor's Administrative Assistant
i. Kim Scattarella, Engineering Specialist Valley Daily News
Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed
in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. June 12, 1990. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the
Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or
;the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a
;written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the
Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such
appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such
appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified
requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance
bepartment, first floor of City Hall.
The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications
may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may
not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the
land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council.
All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication
permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to
openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the
request by the Court. -
The Doctrineapplies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as
well as Appeals to the City Council.
Bruce Blume and Company
• SA-112-89 ,
May 29, 1990
Page 6 f
I �
9. , Development of the subject site should not have any adverse impact on property values.
Development of the site will increase the tax base, and contribution to the various traffic needs
will offset any adverse affect on the general utility infrastructure.
10. .While this office does not believe an easement access is a particularly beneficial method of
providing access to an industrial site and is proscribed in the city's subdivision code, (the
private segregation taken by the applicant has avoided some code requirements including, it
appears, this one) generally access and circulation is adequate for the site. The applicant does
need to provide pedestrian walkways on the site connecting the two parcels, and the parcels to
the street.
11. The applicant has included recreational amenities on the site that should also minimize off-site
impacts or substitute for the city's limited-recreational facilities in this area. Since these
'amenities appear to, be on what will be separate legal lots subsequent to the division of this
property, the applicant should provide cross easements permitting the tenants of both properties
to use all amenities.
12. The absence of a special permit application seems strange since the applicant is proposing rather
major changes to the site, not only filling the site to create building pads above the flood plain
and filling wetlands, but also excavating wetlands. It would appear logical that these extensive
changes to the site should receive more attention. Site plan review does not provide anywhere
near the same level of detail in areas of fill and excavation that a special permit application
would provide. It may be inappropriate to impose this level of review at this time on this
applicant, but staff is hereby notified that special permits for such activity in the future will be
required as site plan review,does not provide a reasonable alternative.
DECISION
The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC.
2. The applicant shall provide additional pedestrian paths/sidewalks connecting the two
sites with each other and connecting them with Oakesdale.
3. The applicant shall provide cross easements permitting the tenants of both properties to
use all recreational amenities on either site without regard to property lines.
4. , The applicant shall bond all wetland and upland landscaping efforts by providing a bond
or other assurance acceptable to the city.
5. The applicant shall have to covenant that the wetlands shall be maintained during the
life of these two proposals.
6. Unless the applicant can demonstrate with competent, technical evidence that additional
wetlands cannot be created elsewhere, the applicant shall create .99 acres of wetlands to
compensate for the filling of an-equivalent .99 acres.
7. All landscaping and wetland modifications, including creation, shall be accomplished
prior to the issuance of anv certificate of occupancy, including temporary occupancy.'
ORDERED THIS 29th day of May, 1990. '
FRED J. KA MAN .
HEARING E AMINER
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
MITIGATION MEASURES
PROJECT: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-112-89
APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-112-89
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex,
including two structures, parking and
service areas, landscaping and recreational
amenities . There is a wetland on the site
-- . 99 acre portion is proposed to be
filled and the remainder will be enhanced
with native vegetation. The 16 acre
project site is vacant and is zoned for
manufacturing park use.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 601 Monster
Road.
RECOMMENDATIONS : On April 11, 1990, the Environmental Review
Committee issued a Revised Determination of
Non-Significance-Mitigated to include each
of the eight (8) conditions attached, plus
four (4) new conditions as follows :
9) That the applicant provide $4 , 000 . 00 as
a fair share payment toward the Washington
State Department of Transportation project
for the signalization of the (SR 900)
Martin Luther King Way/68th Avenue South
intersection, subject to the approval of
the City of Renton Public Works Department
and the King County Public Works
Department.
10) That the applicant provide in-kind
replacement (and enhancement) of wetlands
to compensate for the . 99 acre of emergent
wetland which is to be filled.
Replaced/enhanced wetland shall be between
. 55 acre and . 99 acre and is to be
connected to existing wetland areas located
on the northwest portion of now-defined
Parcel #4 . Wetland replacement/enhancement
plans are subject to approval by the City' s
Landscape Planner and concurrence of the
State Department of Wildlife;
replacement/enhancement shall be achieved
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
11) That the applicant allow an annual
inspection by the City of each and all of
the wetlands areas on now-defined Parcel #2
and now defined Parcel #4 of the subject
property, to ensure that these areas are
being properly protected and maintained,
with inspection rights to be provided
through an easement to allow access to the
site and a covenant to ensure that the
easement runs with the land, to be valid
for the life of the project. These
documents are to be approved by the City
Attorney and provided prior to the public
hearing for site plan approval .
12) That the applicant, prior to public
hearing for site plan approval , in order to
ensure protection of the effluent transfer
system, obtain from METRO approval of .
construction plans and provide an easement
and covenant to run with the land for METRO
access to maintain and repair the sewer
line, subject to approval. by METRO and the
Renton City Attorney.
Traffic: 5) That the applicant provide an ingress/egress plan
(e.g. driveway location, dimensions and design) as
required by "Access Management to Streets'and
Highways" or "ITE Transportation and Land
Development Standards" or as recommended by a
licensed transportation engineer in order to ensure safe,
efficient access for large trucks hauling products from
the site to the adjacent heavily-traveled Oakesdale
Avenue.
(Note #1: All traffic mitigation plans [Conditions #3
through #5, inclusive] must be approved and fees (if
established) paid, in advance of the issuance of site
preparation/building permits for the development.)
(Note #2: The development will generate additional
traffic [estimated at 83 trips per day] to the nearby
intersection of Martin Luther King Way and 68th
Street, where level of service "E" already exists.
Because this intersection is under the jurisdiction of
King County, the City will notify County officials.
The applicant may be called upon by the County to
participate in signal warrants at that intersection; the
applicant has been so advised.)
(Note #3: The Washington State Department of
Transportation may call for additional mitigation
measures if more than 10 trips occur on any state
highway during p.m. peak hours during construction or
operations).
Storm Water: 6) That the applicant:
a) provide a.revised site plan which elevates all
structures a minimum of two (2)• feet above the defined
floodplain elevation of nineteen (19) feet; OR, b)
provide secondary containment for all structures to
minimize leakage of damaged products (e.g. from fire or
flood) to protect the underlying terrain against
contamination, over the life of the project; OR c)
provide a "hold harmless" agreement ensuring that the
municipality will not be responsible for any damage
occurring to the site or developments thereupon
resulting from flooding on the property. Plans and/or
agreements shall be subject to the approval of the Fire-
Prevention Bureau and the Public Works Department
(agreements shall also be approved by the City
Attorney), and shall be provided in advance of the
issuance of site preparation/building permits.
Storm Water: 7) That the applicant shall provide a storm water
drainage management plan, in advance of the issuance
of site preparation/building permits, subject to approval
of the Public Works Department, including: a) on-site
detention with 100 year/7 day design (with design
specifications provided in a supplementary soils
engineering report) (*); b) Type II catch basins with
baffled oil/water separators; and c) biofiltration swales
for storm water prior to entrance into the wetlands (fire
lanes adjacent to wetlands will require adequate
biofiltering buffer strips).
(*) There is an approved Soils Engineering Report on
file, but because staff is recommending a 100 year/7
day design system, rather than the customarily required
25 year/2 day design system, owing to site
characteristics -- e.g. elevations, wetlands -- the Report
will need to be modified with respect to design
specifications prior to the issuance of building permits.
Construction/Noise
•
Light/Glare/Traffic 8) That the applicant provide a construction mitigation
plan including the following components: a) an erosion
control plan; b) a plan for protection of the wetland
area to be retained while the area to be eliminated is
being filled; c) a plan for wheel-washing of all
construction vehicles prior to leaving the site; d) water
down the site periodically to control dust and debris; e)
a plan for restriction of hauling routes and hours of
hauling operations; f) a plan for signage of site and
structures during construction to facilitate emergency
service provision; and g) a $5,000.00 cash bond for
street clean-up.
In addition the City requests:
Recreation: 1) That the applicant make a voluntary contribution in
the amount of $5,000.00 to the development of the
•
Master Trails Plan in the area of the site.
2) That the applicant provide a recorded easement to
establis-h a connection from the site to the proposed
adjacent Master Trail, for use by project employees,
subject to approval by the Landscape Planner and the
Parks and Recreation Department.
Note #A: Modifications to the site plan (architectural design), the exterior illumination plan, on-site
recreation plan and dryland landscaping plan (increased plantings; thematic integrity) and landscaping
maintenance bond will be required in conjunction with site plan review.
Note #B: Specific plans/specifications for on-site and off-site improvements, in compliance with
Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, Public Works Standards (Storm Water, Traffic, Water Flow and Fire
Flow) and related regulations, will be required at the time of site preparation/building permit
• application.
mmdoc
•
•
•
•
•
.., ..., ......I\M\IM,I m...,H ii- Ng..•:ri.,li t im%spi4kal0_'hkc.t.I9,.l2,4lm...'u-....1ur.z.'lN,•4.A.i.„5,,.la0:).mI'-..0..Mst;m,1.,a;..0l.l.....11..-E1,.;1 1 1,S iv0•.1_v;.1 11
,:1t::1,;-:1:.,x-1,..4..1h 1.,1 1.1.i'..V 1 1.I*e•.g Io.giI.aV0•.
i.i1s..
1.1lp11lt
11111 0:60.ik1i°1
-10
1„ia:i 1?6fi..11?1l1lL
i1I11,M,1
..N_1i_1m11i1.1,11IM__11111
=1M111u1 011111i1.111l11111n1l1111 1t1.6,1-"•••k-L'(':'--•.c1,e:.-' g0ggo6,00og00=0 00g,a0n(g3•0°o,‘.ob%0p0°00,°o0001o,00,,6.7) oo..-,ec•.,.,.....'..°0oo.0.,1,.V.I,4,w•tg°tg._,i'0o0og0.0,4,E.o0°.0...•if\.•.••.p---iA:.:r••.-i rr.ee•••ivp•i'•tN••.t••lC0.••••••.e--o0.i••••reg••••••••o0-
.••••••
4
•i1 pF.••0*1:*:•••;•i:1::::.•7••::.::.:.:_:7:••:=E:e••••d1••::
••:..
••ij1u i1•. •
•••:•i•P;
•••"•i•ip-p,,l
-•o-•..•0•-.••4•.••t.O•••..•o!,,„_A..••"v••i'i.•I,•„_)a
• • • • • • • •
L i .W: . . • • • • • • • • • %• •
:00000 2ooga • • • • • • • • 0 • • • 1
0 • • • . • • • • • • • • • •r14 . s • • D • • • • • • • •
.•e•••••e• ••••••••••••:•••••
el • •••• • • • • • • • • • •I•;•:o••;::%.,7•111117 4 •7
• MM 1: 0Mn
a •;s'•,;....,..,.,i•.±,-J•:•••';:.-....;,d,
Z•;'.`.•,•:`i,.:,..0•::.;•,,.:"*;.a,,.
,''-•.l
3.-
.::.
HIM
>
< A II
:::::go 00,000.000000o. go°°°?.4911 1
Min. gagggOgggggo..N. -O. °lib I:0.•'
MI L.•L la- AM,' '°
n i o.ogogog,g0000000... 14,.....4. in.ilorly . ..0.:
, ...
0 0 0,0,00g0g0g0.00 ..„...
.3.00000k
lk.... -•-•- IF"
.. 0 0 0 0 0 c, 00,:.,0c.,0•
os --...041i-6„,„11 e•.0....
••.um..maikar.timisgo k4,,,,,..N.
immr giTi
.................
:WM*. "4IMIIIIIIII.k c gleopi gnhirgb-vs,,si or _ ) i' • ..,,
...,<,:,.,-,„„<.c. ...,,,,,,,. aiedrebonmuz 0-0.go•ogorr 1 untittm.r." .:'"-. /. Ma-',.r
1-711,. :. I'M MEIN''0.°O°0000%og I.Vorm.-..:....,.4t! :-,....:..!•F:1:1 .. .,`.,,... 11/ .',,
\ ..''Q`;';?..•./..'''''\ . r4;* ''....A. telliallin( gggggg.2,02,0:1 ii,..1Lniinki4:- ',cSey .i.:.:-..Z.4:, :'
„...
\ • • • (1,,, ,‹ ,..
• • '...t...'.. .:Miiiii:i::::..... '3'• ,. . • 0 cl •• •• ' I !v./. sIMIMMIL • 0 0 0 0 0 0:•01.111101101My• ..,.: ..t - • ...',-. X..:
-- 111110111111111.41. _ 2......... . ass.tessussarai -0 . , 4404
MMMMM innik.a.-- ...illemn.i•••••••••11r00000:"- ..,1106
-..... \ • ,v ::i*:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•:•.... . ''...0,0.-.:?,(.7.1,9^.,• ,
/.46 mi....mmmmmmmm MOHNEN we Emmen
- illittlii ommumartismii•mq•°•, •..•.. Aim
,..114•EN
• •:',.^ •] iii:::i::::]i::i::iigi:ii::::iii:i::::::.:.. ''•"' ,scv Q`O - °SAID
)) ...---.....---)^n. : . • ''• • w
•.. ,;•'::iiiIiiiin:i:::i:i:i:i:i:i:i::::: z.:..f..: 40.:.;,%'•,:p',..-'',Wis:', . .
' ''''''''''''''':-:-:•:•::" . ..,,t •„c31,.sii".• ' '",c,•,4'..,;",.. ',k fitt.3,
0S,dism.iiiiii&CM- 'O .
_ •: ::. ,',30.i., ,.•,•• - : ,, . - -... Ist, 211" T' .1:01•101
.__ . 0001171r!......"'''''-'••
.- • g.SEII -m
losiiiiiiitat 1 .. .-.,,... ...,
.00001!;0100' • • •,,,". ••• ..,
inersumur r).&':.•,c; *,,.:;,.. .,•%•'
•??:....ffnmetv.:zemennir 0;'g•,.,.:,:.": Ve:1-.4'".i
•• :i :: ;;-:„;•,,,r, __-_---_--_ • ,...-.N14%. Afi0
:•:•:•:•:•;•:•:•:•:•:.:.:.:•:•: ,..,...- ; _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ .:. ....:--,, ..... ,„,,,,01.7...- •Iiiir -
:,,,..,::: 4 . . • <-1,:,...-,,,,..,.',,,„•,,,,, ,--.1.5,M,,..,,....„)
...., .......
:•:•:•:,.::::.:•:•:•:•:•:•: ..3...• .-4_,.'.•.::::::,:::::•:.:.:• ,:.*:::::::7,5.earwl,..„.mmmmmmmmm•,...! ..,0- .,:41kii---" ' . .c.,...„,... ...
,1111•20 // .,.44M.e! e Big. ! °-.::2"eg . . t'..
:•:t:::::::::::::::' .0• , • -7.......,••-.1 __-_ •l 4 t. •.•:1:.::.:.:.:.•:•.•:•:.::::.:.:......A••••V mraismirkammt §6: yi,,A 5.1..nf,:., .
------,•-.----- \ %:::::::::•••• . • .!....,?,..--_ ..,..7..'..--,' %-,•,.... . ..,:•:•:•::::::.:.:..:.:.:..:.:..:
. ,.."' .; . ..1-e".,..c.z.r. sc',..-- .c.:4..'.....' .. ....:.:•::•.::::•:.:.::::::1 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm P FM k ..0.4,-.0.,
----------- . ,:-.,:....
m•mmmmm wi ittoilitro..4 I\ -•i;
)'__,A4.17 jr"-t.--f•- ..... y . • -_-_-.„- _
14°1'[.. i:_-_-•-, _f . , ---_-0-.Me--• .• ,...,
•ei,.. ...
/•,.:1I-.:-..c.'-i.VA4er 1-° ' -,..-------
c;:e•-•••'•• : .
• • . •• ,...••..,.t. :•._
- • • .., _ i i •••••••-iiriiii.0,-,0 mmmmm Namur III VD00,,000000°..
mmmmm NE Imams::00:1 . - r
I.°0°0 mm•!;•MM MI
1,- •o o•
•-•._ •oo•
-.-tF-•s 7 00
..-•:•;V. .°..
k.,,,'•e;c:17 ,s: 21-53:4_4210-_____ Monlionlioi.t '
--- ( Q;c'e*C"'.0 'ci`,...ti.-caPri;.`;) :-• SEM 111. 0=i0IIMM MMMMM MMOMMMII
i a •,..
.........-11••-___,,. , I
''i4(rfer IT', .•0•00••••000•.v., "loftrow 1/:,•::::::':t:: ....,.:.9,...,• ,.1.,••',.`..:.sz;:•:,...'--,:-0,-.J.
H--- - -..- WO. 1 1 g..1:i::MM::liiiiii ,•,'i?;.::;;;,'..,,i,''-.
'') •''' . 1,..,n,•:.C.%A•lr CO00000000000000••^. -----Li.-gergit - 000! rome ' .,_e.",, , '01 t
,.,,,%:,..ell.'. -,\ • •00000000000000':-..--.JR._ -tr.
•000000c,,D0000c, , _.,_ ... _ --- reL".... AA_ • ... r‘:::::.::::i::::*::i:x:i:::o.
---- -------\ \•„, -.. 0c,c,00000000••• _.--___ -wil 111:.MMMM imin.--- i*::i:i:i*ii:i:::::::::::::.:.
...c qf \ „ ••0000000. • .. ., ---„ala_c_.-1- .0,-• 4:_,..mgligrir is,„„ ......_ _A,.0,0000 •••ig i, . -- • . - .!0 1.,..,cI..".. ',.;,..?;..' •,..,..,,.. r
,...\.:cy, ________),...•• .:-...,00.....„.-.•••...• •e ii -. -. -- '----''''."--.......m..--.,---- .lip Agois%,....::„.:.:::..:.:.:.:.::::::::::::::::::..„ ..,,....v., bo,
, • • ,.... • • • _ In
_.,.4 • i'• • ''..•;."----•• '- '-'!--"".":'''..".••7- . ."...1 "" .5140M-Iik, Ebb. .."q814. ;i ::ni.W.:gn: , •';',:•:'',.:^,••
• k.IN),• •. • '. ..•il.'"I TAN-_-_-_-WF.4 i„L'i t '•N ...": :,.:i:i: :: Y,C••••:It'','''',•'O."'V''''
' ,/ ...A.Millaii•,.; • ' .411111....111% ."-...-. ..%
/ .1 MMMMMM P•all1,111\•,,o .‘, . I . 0;:.:::iiiiii::-..!.
..., ...iii MMMM....,:., i
..-.110,..: NM ,••,- I q,
ollnISMORMIMMOMEN . '-3.
)
400 . . .--.• ea:021Eifilia.•,i, -=-=1_74_-.---1--_-.7 -----=-=- .':.'2; c.t:rt.- .'
•
ii.....V. ---4P7NZE -=--=_.7.7:-1 P,,.., 0°0 ::::::::::,: .• "-igig
0 ...
...... ,‘.
ilq•!•••• ill•
M • • • ME, 111M00111 .E.-_
•,...,Ns...•
• • • 1101111100001WIIIMIIM0 ,. - - 111...."?..?,'
Is ocip°0 .....•:":::::::::::::•.t•,,
11111111111.11100_, 100.....• • • • 11101OMMIMMIMI1000101,9 -_ ,.'_ .0,, ___ I,
IMINEMII ••••• 11101M MMMMMM•ti•immt,...;-_--_ 0000000.7_-_-_.- I.;•s?••.•.
tamcv.
••• 0 0 •tm:•:•:•::::::::::•• ,.
.. 000,00,0, -.::::::.,.:....:.•........,,„,k.
IIIIII • • ::::::::::1"::::.''---7---- -- ."C"---- I ''''''' '•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:‘-
MEWL" • i I N• •••••• .....,. .".
IMMIIMMt-Ellailai''' IIIIII. '::•::::::: . .f.r..
..,
Immo MMMMM• 1110111100111000M1 MMMMMMM• ... __M -----I .4.;?2,.•
1110010Ein10011 .1110111001111000111
......_,......... ............. $3. ------ 1<:::'.1.3,•"' _..
101'00M1 MEMO MI R.,,:-.,..,•_:-:,. -,:•,-*. )
--- ---"
I.0,'t•-.• . , 1,,,..1":••• MMMMMMM 7,C _ _ ::i...e? nonnnn ....•.
-
,- - •0000 V"..f,v,ri .......000,)000
iiii iilime t. ,. lium• MIKE 000 ? • _ ___-_ ..,,,e :.:.:-:-•000000•/ • '%.,,
I AI e'..?..:. I ril _;:,,-_-i_-_/-4-_-_-_--_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ .1!„ 00000•.•;-a.„...,.
00000 c.r.::. : ;. •000000• ,
' •
'•AfEz1:4`.--:-=-------------- .-frl'-` • -000. •000000•-
,:•'.;;;:.
0_ --N •000000... 2)
-.. - •
------ t Ai c,, 110111, !..,_71140.._,1::,,_________mpz _M .;...,,,. 1 .J.? z00mw...
_ ••.••0 0.0 0•
'.:;.1., ,a44..", I. I
Nl :..;,-;I.. . U I ,,,''i,._--_---_---_-_,"',- -..--_-_---_-_-_-_-_-_------_ ,.,,,.:..
‘' '..,C.:.I I 1 II I I I.r..:31.,:*,..,')..t'EA. ';::; "---=-1:-=.-:=-:-.1.-= '.------__ .,`6.:, ,,_
ilizi-. ,• ' .•
•,c,..-..,• .T- ....-...."V j,s------_-_-_--•--\_--1-_ ,'' ri:, •1';
1 --
•••••'-''...1::•i•J:• ::'.1----------------I--- f‘, 10
.,
• .,•,3,:,.•. .J°:7-,:f•',:-:,_,,,•"-•;:'-..:'.;. r
.;.::-.4,-, -P 4•1' '' ''' ....EF:30.,-;P.,n,`:i:: ---------- '''•-•"' 1 ,
,_.,-.
elk.
• • .,.,..,E,,,,,------ . .-,; :,•.,..,-;•.a,•",[1..,.--- -5- ..,-,.,
op
•
Kb.•••, - -- LH __ •../:
• • • ' ...,, P:. •
1 •• • r'.:7.Th-;-7--- --- -
AD • • -...-''' -
T „
_
\ . .• • .".:1;ff- - i -1,
. -> '-A-• 'E.
1 ts:▪ -' •
. 4 •,. .
,•'' •
LAND USE ELEMENT r-.,,,
..,..:..-_, -
•••• •• ••• II\.
IIM,
. .:1•,.:::::::1: 10000101:1100A
•:•:•:••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:::-.111 MEHL
.,..,-•-•,,,.-•-...• ::::::: ::iiiiii:M:i::::::111111111111:1
f • •00c,o• - • ......?. ..iii-tiii--*:::. iiiiraMir
0000000• Or, ,
Single Family Nmm.... Commercial •
.810.00000000001 ;!,..,.. ,,(...o::: •,•:::.::: Fr:r.............:.:..•_ ..:•••
.0000000;r ••.- -1-. •:.:.: - "..:..:.:.:.:.
00.000,3•. . .....-. ...• :2.. :),...
• ,\ \A-, 0000000.
•000000•• •.• ..:-.
::::.:.:.:.:.:.:•:•:•: Low Density 00000._•. .... ....„ •,.,,
v .
Ilt _
•.......-.............
•••••••••.........-... Office / Office Park 700000.00..... . •. :::::::L. ,...,... ,...• :-..
::::.::::•:•:•:.:•::: Multi-Family ,0000.000000.
.00.0..00.0. •:.:.:*.:.:.:. •-,..-..., ,
•00.0•00.000 :::::....:•:. ,,......, ..:,...,,
-,.:•:•,:•:.:.:.:•:•:.:•:.:. : D0000000 00• 000•0000• ..^..., *•:.P.:::•:, .. ,•0.3•.....„„'.?i
Medium Density 0000000C
D0o00000 r... , ..0.009,000.0000o.o ..,,. ,.......•2.
Public/Quasi-Public/Quasi-Public uti•o• ,?,...,..c ...,,.e.2.;. .....-'2,,,,l•-';-',.,
0000000c
,00000(30C ' -V.,"•:-
:- ',t'f•• . •
::.:::::::::.: :f,•••:?; ,
4::::,xes::::::::oc::,:;3:: ';-2-:: , •,..Light Industrial I
W§Maitee0 High Density
...,.:-.,.:. 1 ;
•'"'Vwt:•.:::ti IsIoetp.,
. , ._,. .
•'t.;,IRri,j.s,'
• • •
Recreation
•
•••• • Heavy Industrial
• • • . •
..,..
-.
.Agh
• i •
•rei. __ 10,
_ .
-_,--;:-.7--•v"•= .
,,,-,-,:-.,,.. • ... VI.
Greenbelt
,A.,,•-s,i.e-: _____-
------ Manufacturing Park li
i ..
•
:.-!.-r:-.Z.f•Cr.&„ ',
/ Multiple Option k. •
•
•
M.51'j',* .: . 1 A a.. .,.t,. .\ . 19 \. 15 . i
b.',„. ...,•1. v z5 9 r 21 �.., t 1
',�h?yam { r<. • './ �c-.'• •Z� l ``. .-. I • 1
/ .
•
ii_ " ,'Jd , ABANDONED •
1 1
y �,
'VkY • !
(' I 1 ...
t .,1..:2:'..1':2:';4::.'''':';,'''. • \. OM
OP fp
lc,y .M1�
r ,...\., ,
.._. .. ..• ,..• . ,.
• . . ...,\.. i . . •./ N. pit .
5� � M •
E T R 1
Vt. ,. /f,i. I \
_t�.:.: 4
: -
J'v . _ • _ - .- ; i - - -p- -- - - - - - • \-
`;get1 •�b:'i•; — •. YrLI • - -
.fy:. ,; .. • -om•'° ` O-
I
.
;; .;.. !' D I .S'` P .0 S
' .77/ \ ,.• N' . '. ••. . •
-: I
\\ ' ),
::•.•,„. : ice: --% 11
ii,.:';*:•;•:1••:,....• '•i i _ •• ir \ .,,,;,,,,,,,,„ k ______—
e. ....,. I
ti.t,:',
/4* ',-------,' :.: .:
te.4e , ,...r.-::,.;,,.,...• •_. • i./ • :: • . " ,,_ . __ .-,
4,,,. ,..... ,,..4.1„••,..,.... •:: 2, • • ., . :...•_• --._ . ,,,• 1
.i• ,f,•,...„.....„.......:, „ft, • _ . (.. . : . _ ,,,,....... _ ,_.
. .r1/1---y ' i •
•
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
SA;ECF-112-89
APPLICANT Bruce Blume and Company TOTAL AREA 16. acres •
PRINCIPAL ACCESS Monster Road
•
EXISTING ZONING M-P
. EXISTING USE Vacant and Warehouse/Office .
•
PROPOSED USE Warehouse/Office buildings
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN •
COMMENTS Located at 601 Monster Road '
//
///i.
1 • .
. .
. .
•
-c.,..r e.....c...wo,......rio -
-1
..I
•
. .. . .
1./AI7
1..,4 ..
f. 1
' •
dr, .
..1,.. t.,
:p...
• .
,,T,, •
/
1-F t_T-ri-'2.;::,..,;:„-;:,:f-.1,._-_•:-..7-2,... -.1
--‘tc.t;''pi4.-3"%''''F. i c .,1 •
•
_Lc. Tf?te.n...GRouna.: ....,.....7 lt.,...
i i 1 7::74
-\ '',7:-.7.••• . C) 1,7-"..l'.P‘ •
UW •:...11 1r'-,'-i , .7"- 0 l_i i to C....r•..I 0- ! i;
i .. a ,
‘!,,,.. •..-7.s.: :.381 I / 6
\-------.. .. r.... - i
:.
..._...__,-__..._...____..__".e.,-2. -.....,,___,..,•?..v.--. . . ,,.,.
• -----/
- .
,':;..t.':!'' -.•_ .i.. „„,- • , II!' ' *,:, i • .,. .( 1 ) ._ ..- '
. I --••.- •,-"•@__1. ---r=---------=
, .. I ------:- ! I . . •__y______ \"
-1- I : • I ! -1.: ' \A) N'. •
-----1 1."•• I I' ' ' f• , •,,,s. •
. •
, ) '...i.::: •-I. \\‘‘„ •
,''' ct- •
• ,/et„
,,.
> I .• I I , I .----
• I \ ',• , -
, 7:"....'..".I I.• 07 , , , „, N / ,
.-
,,, 1 ,......„.......„.. ...._,, ,
`-:_\
. 1 ,. , __ .... , ‘. .• •_,...,-.., . ,
\ ,
• <, ; ,,‘„, \ -..- ,i,,
\,---.) l', i CZ' , •
' \ '
s . .,--s,,•••,•^
., , / > i•▪ 1
1
/ ' •., ,
, ' •
t.,-Ea,, -_.. v 1E.• ,,,.r‹..,!!-•-f-1 O Iv .
.s•• /L., _ I '1, • •• --.-- HI ••• ,. ., \‘‘.
• . ., •, • •▪ ' ,•', ,
- -.- I -I- \ •.....„.
i -.7'4441 no It cccccc.SectIon 14.Toue hip It
, I 1 N • \\
..... 1 / ante notth WC,- mmmmm 2622.11 feet tO rio rrrrr.rrrrr h•t•.on*iiIi , • I,
7 •,.........7 rrrr • L., / .....-. rrrrrrr II mot In s•la loon.. a....mg.. 11.
• yy_ • • . ) , ,
I'1 • :
'-----***I., • ' .N. - -y-,.--.:7i._ __***-•*.-'-----
:7;•,-''_•!---7 -1 .-7'
.....''.7 and..Z..P:1;1•Caln%Innr;•:."•..''"'...."‘"----'n.."'
1..- 1..g ( '6 . I p .------ss.--4 ..:' .....,....7.Z 17 ..t••••......1••••to tha nor.------Iy to.....••y.th•
...thorn-------11.1.1.1.11.n•Floht-ol-v•yi 15,0.,I I p
I 7'1. I
.1 ic.1744;•.546•trsrn,1""14'[7.1-.1,1.- -*\->\ ....S'\*-.-**
....•..."-•••-• i 7
•Iong!h.------ly boundary.I.e.eanveyod to Ch....NI------•....' o. i7.)111
• ' ; . / • ,:>•"' Pocifie-------4 Coop•nyI for ite-----oil rye lino 203.00.....
more or a..,t•1••••••••,th b..•t-----ikir..•I.;......tl.•••• .I . 1,-1
____ • • • <------• ,,,,,,-,--L-,,...-.,..si__, 7\ .". ______
I 1,e, 1 .-, •
,
,,/„-' /,::?' „' ..4::;,'X' ^' ..m...................the•••••.••ly.......••.4 71... j i
60
• (,---,,s ,
,, f
.../ ..'•IV •rol the no......t co,.....or the north...su.....of sold Section
1:3.1"elot":=4:;.::72p;:l...all'le.=hl:;.2'...;'•.;•.."4.441 1.:
4. ... •*.*17'''
.7-7 ....-,73
.. \7 SI ' '..........-"•••• ) /43•7.......
.
' ch......ni i....•••.na as.r...t.....•••coai•••••,. 11 IL] -
`-;..- ; l'' ..• '\'''.4----'' .r--„ / "'qr..- "."'. [SCUT ti•......If aoy.......C.b.•rut•hore•of tha.
si.o.At...••‘...,.,••••••t.....4 oh•li“W..........J to,• - 2 nort.4e.Cu......4•7tIon 14....h...
. 4'7'....; 'i, 447.7.r,•-•,,...-1-.....
0 Z
4".:•-.';'!-;-'71-`7;-.."c-X.'.:. .i . .r„ / -"1 ---- ,-.;"..- , ..nOtOn.••••••th•a
• / •••1',.i.."'“ I .. I. ) I • ...... li ti) '.11tt
7 .y.4.\ 1 oh-71.4731ot .•••
' / .../....%.•-•'" r*,,, •-
. I I ( '• 717..*‘..-7' **.'7.,
.,,,,/ . li.'\ ... Irr..-'1........7.... 1. 7.7 •C.....-7. -.. ../ y ...C.•outh 3.••,.......••6 f•••••••••O..••••to.••••t••.1
•
thance•Iong••ta u•sterly.•••••,....,th 1/1•34.04.soasei 31.31 r..,
•\)/ 'ir). : ',
:-,.* 1 . __ .------,,,,-/Ce:-•-- .
. 1,-----, ''''....f.,..;......• , ti'''
__„,/--Le•-,'-'----.. '''''''. 4 2;,e,'''' 0,-V i745,71,`....:,.!ii 1....`;::•7"""""'“"^"`"".^""
os••c•••••"" ".":"."'"''''".."'''....."..s"'"''. .
V•Tg.s;•:td r.'1':.::.::.............'4;: 6:....2!no!,;.P...t''''' 1 i
-.-'1,%1 . •
----:.„,--;,--'-. 1 ,,I,-.0'•••1.' •'.' ,-, ' th...4 mouth.......y sloop tle ere a/meld..r.re concore to th .
•.'• ;;;:;:cs.Lr.4.31.1,e...";;=•:tr""•"°•°°""' g
\ , . ....,y...,.-7*••1.....---...•-•• • •
enc..nor......*le.....213.70 1•••t to the Int. M.4fr''' ItS0 411C147•tr.%ol l•nd•In the southuest qv.7;..of.t:•11;:;"11".
...,.....-- ...y../. .........................
,orneh1p 31 Mort,Sono.4.....14.14..le King County.Posh.......
7,-16. 1.-•57.99 ' .".:-•1.....E..
..rz.::::•-:,..-v.v...:7-1r.t-,1,7----- DI ..\.,-.7:_ ...1 2_,-,• .„,'"--' V,' I.(..a.41•AcT 1.-6,5,1• . ...;;;;-5.1":::::::•.=„•'""''..--'•"--".•
...•K,rata.,•Co ":••••:7„.7.7;...2::',..::-.L--.V:.".7:-.7..:;Z:17. th•no.sou.101.3.17•met. to spoInt on th........y.....nor the
o....y.;.•,-..-_____„_,_-.., ..... •••---'2.7-------•-• ':......:17•4...4.7•••=.7....7.4••••'..."••••••-..* St.re.••••1 Pacific........Coop.,17-e•3.1151,TH f.:43.....-K..510 0 .
.5..••••,,,..s.,, ,.•• . • .• ItItht-ol.rmy ena tA4 true potnt el he.....1711 4.)
VICI .-•••" - ,',Z' -,4,1"1,4,,•"•,•113.3., ,".nor..............••1d.............n.11.114 Mica,.
14........•St.P•ol.••••1 Paelfle lalloro4dCoup•ny rIsht•of-rey. i L 0.2 ;
..-r""- . ' c.,rre",•-e.•cat,...it -.r. ••...33.......thor....I•1.3o0P.......IOC....1.0 Coo., 1:1)41)a o
:tr.o•lesm.lo ji....;..;.......54 County Road Mo. I"hoi" k
11114f0/.4 4. -MP ..........................
'• . '7.7.77.'....17.7.7:: .:.." .":.::: E.F.:-.:•:./±e•••••1. ...;7'4
n...ce- ....••••••• ...
I,•I-n•Wel-outhe•ly mt..•........31..31 toet. COI 0 Oj .4
1.•th71•47.11C 1.034-5
' .7.=
if
-1.-,Uj' I }INI:.,j• • S.cr-c./7.11:016/0ifrp.IBUTIOni
..---........''..-..'''''""."..'........ '...--:=7.:...=.-.L.r.:..:.-z:::..7„r--- ..... ,.........,.....,................,Coontr•••S
.•174.7.7.`..:::.:;•474.:••••••.;...n'.7.••21'..V.... v.r..mt..7.1..0.•••..................--.. .7;•1:.1:`"•!:;!•17.....:;otnl:;•1:1'•••:1;1.4';':X•:;.:::44...1.•;th l• E 0 ;
lor....1 en the southarly......el•poeo•nent.............dea••••V... 7., •1 ?;,pf, ..-- 7/'Ki) I E s -r rt-60,1
2...•MG 7 171622, ' .1=7..44141%,-,..,-:::,-.r.....'..... ....'... Er.,...-:-.•::.7::;%;7::."-7/.1::::."7.1=
...s.,,........,.....dt..y..b.,non.....4,......t.x.. III 0 1 I
Count,I••.•1-I 74•.•••P•no.."IS POInt,••••••......hr.,II/*
. I •
•u
**',1...."lot," •.11.,: 4.........St•t•Lontr•rt C.141 4.4......Worth Cone, 1.- U 03 -1
- C i
11 '..-,,,tb.'.... Wi't... .' ..: I 400:WACr,-.5 V601-inie..., .d me.•,•,...••...........ti...i.ct•.....,...••••,...•L:t.,1•::ir.;" 0 laCii V
•
1 V .,,,.......;;s2,,,,...,(ni. .u.,......,....
qt.2.'ec-•.ly-rtd1
"::::.--.....:7-.7=4.-.!--:•=..-''''-''--'' ";F:,:!'•,:F.:;:::,t,;,..F,...ii,;:',Z:::::''''''''''-'''''' th.......th 74.13.1e.....:mi..t.., .....•
...-- . . •
' 'i. . •ISL ' it .:,-",
,00. , ..„...,4.0. ... i MA,..11.4,--10,00".,•S•rf
'14'11 4.'4',srii,l'..1'0.%, • which!more north I.....41......an ate a.......of
13.1.43“et.•ore or les,to th•................•Ch......
,1- '4(•!•7•I . .421 -•••••••MI Av..,pwr"-v-e.17.,TN,•e--../ .
,.',dN.,:,,5: ,/C.E.-- ;1 , , th•tr.*poInt of hoslonirvi* __
. .
. . . • .
•
. .
• 1 • r
Ecr.......0,.,1‘i,-..Fl.A.-f-eitilE.•:, E . E.1....fp.-, ESL-c?cs. . '
. N'...',S' ..:- 7:---••=1/'talk&
.. • N--- v•r.,-----....-1-.r-es,.- - . ,,,,. +
-2.-fil ..i? Pv•roa.eo A/// / ”/ .,c / 6,
-...... -.•,:-..,- ,..
.ige,0011/16- ... ... ' 'Wei-;=-5,,- ,—, 0 .- -• ,,. l__• IBIUNamil*.. . . CESCRIPTIoN syNnect _‘, .*.s....... r,.., ..,, -••:-.....••.--j..2-H,Z........,...74jaw. Ito ,
FF.OPERTY LINE --•— T,\L,,...v illiA tar;.....,„....,. --N.r....,. `4'4,,,,, ,
',41TOIR,Trrnm.• % .7, ‘4411IWPS inigiWgilbri W ',14.4*;,,‘!*.. LOT LINE „. .Tns‘..., ' .(;',/..,•_..,---------•,... NAZI
--10-1.140:Mall. '. •11MMIL'Ill •s
. •''''\ r pi1.0e0sE0 OuiLOINA LINE '!",/ 1 41Ageit,*_4\;"•'',I.A"'SITE , .
. 44 •‘,.."•,;,_..&TiEEL.:— . \
j . EXIST:CONTOUR. 'Ali FtPj I i.4,11k • 11. 6 :
i
\ PPDPOle0 CONTOUR
4 ;.1..,1 C /I • .›...
••• c 4 ..,% •••4 _. . , ti, I _.
/ 1 .r.* t.>‘ ---0' 4 j.,,L/71 - -, ' 's...
di'. .roNo /:••; // .."-"°,..' '''' ',.. RIDCW LINE --'-- liJ 1..A•,..-.ip1 1'"r--1'''C.r.,,,,... . . •
...o 5
I • ,,* \ ____t.,••
.......-------..., ../124\y• r,.:,/ ' -,.../// e' / 'Z..‘N, ,..,,,„,,,, EXIST.SPOT ELEVATION (.9.S) t'I "il) - A. .
lil
/ -t.,' ----T....,_... , ,,I,A%,,/ I \ C. coN '..\\ N• ''-'"'"L'4.".morose°sPar eLevArrioN .-e•' ',. ..' 5.18::.:1-
.„ • . 040 \,4 \
FLOW LINE eLevAnoN ,....--
41% •?-7 IL-...i.CP,4
1 4. ..f,. , F• .,...---:-.._r---r.---=-•\Q.."--------..4'.--7- • . ‘ •. S, gocg 0... • - • ;,: = .,,..;11 ..,, 5 a'
•- --....,n,11, •.- -- , .,,i, I .1.,. .
0 1
'‘' ------------- .1% ;VI 1,--_1\ ,,
.i, skl:.„‘
!), / 4r----- \•'--.7----___f____--- d',;\ Q DIVERSION 0/TCH —•-•- '. air IA'14.....-• -I‘I .ii.-!'.'E.•'., '—5 ,r,.7
1 1 " ,, t. er
/ '1 1. 1 41 PRO ‘' 0 OUILOINOI'5" .,,k, SILT FENCE VIC-11...11-EY frt., ' M vLI f..
,, ,..,,......_______-------7 \ \\‘,.* 011i 2 g
2,1 store 0.17,Less omemse parrouu_iii .
( , KC • y„.ELEV.25.0 ., •,,,,...
\
` RT . I ,,,,.1 ' (see niccmfrecr - \ N.\ REINFORCED FILL I I 0.0 •
.' :•--•-i ,., , PLANS rac oac.aa.p \., ,,,, l•6\ L1.1
•y,.... \\cr,7e...,77ora..) \,;,:, EXIST.RAILJ•DAOTEAcrs
'. .41 ' • .1.. ',. I \ • CC•`I t'-‘
. 1., \ - 4.t. 111''.----- -- ' `', \\,. • )..' \ \
• ' '' ----'--------".° -... ..--1". p..,c.-• . ,r5 .
\ \\{. i -,-(.7) •
.4 •\. _÷. ,.1.....> ',;7 .:, \,..,1 i,:',\\ I .<§y 4,1 t,.....••.•:::.A see°ETA,SHLE CO !i'.
• . i / ,Isv \-'4, i•-' . ' D '
"If
\•- \ \ T e.. , .,,,./.., ,,...„,, ....),:
---:- .11. 1
i ',O \ 0 ''.1 \s‘ \ r's, 0 •,, • c' ).\\\ . ...:,.. .._.> sou.-co
. .
GI DI
, i i ..------- I
l fr'
\N- I ,e....io'•..L:t.s.•
. SRCitET.i OreaM rC,e 1 la.M9''U-
. N'OrgTE17•47. L0CATIox. s0ir1 e tiOIsN SwTeEl1 l.IloOr D coSINNT/ATIINNIEEAS T cosounox
-
.,-,. • \ I-- i.„......\\; . 1 % .c. S..14.i..VSIL.1.GE.3/...41.E1 VET.) 0,..E1•AMISS: DACE NUM AND CONTAHT
114 101TH CANAL------.SUITE)10
SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9010)
kIrfAl
\ . 1\
/ _,0
TLAN IMMO ST. IUSH.10E0 a NITCHINGS,INC.
II .... TIOJECTIYA-1AGE1-10•E1T n.TOED I 11
p if ,j)3,1,1 1\s, •,.s / ... VP,:f
(--,- . ,-;---- _)
dr 1 I 1 e-,
1 ILI \7:, 11 h• I 't _:).---"-- ,/
- '.- r`7/pi
I' PCISE° . .."
r i ,1 •A,,,,,
' '
I !:,f I IS .41;1• 13 \/1-IC3 1 N C7
SLIACHAALle ELEV. ,01,- '7
- ,---- -. - k ..
,..., , , \,
•.
if
1-1.E..1.co..N.A.1.-12A--fur-1
I ' .1.14 11 \ ?1.3.1E, ..0 . .• ‘...‘ i Er, . ....... .........-41..--, ..
• Es •eg•-. "ssr •
.,;-• (see Ntaur (7..z77s,,,,,,,, , ,7- ESC.A.¢.0-.G.I.-....P.C.c.......e.o..ou.o.o.6..er.
, , I ' ,.? (-0/4.eaf.a a A'S ,, '..,,,..V.---\•74g."-•.„..Z/E:;;;"....... ..t
ICA.,K06,..1-.............,..L.e[es•-••E.L. .,..--E .4-T
o........0..4.....,...10.4•-.vue....4,,-.0'.ce.i..)3
\ ..1_ p,.,0.,,, WILI.-Er• I
\ .
1 ., " it I \ , POND 1
\ '‘ I
.1# 1 .,•:,,V 4.:4' n'• ....../.....4444...4........4 or..........e.G.,...1 LI.6.G.I.G 6. I-
\ ‘ \ . I. 1,2L--. 1 ........1-...'• .' CVA--Y.L0-1 1.36,-.4...-4,0.CS0 121¢......06.Cri0 6 >- g t
..,
I kl. • , 4:,,4)111.•,, 4 /\ \ ..,'...c... C.,......-OW r-4=Y-16.1-0.2..M.A..F...-......,6 3...,..7. , _J .-•R•
i; \\ /.• N \?OM 040Coun ,,.1.m,
rz-
ocro.a.oir4 2 \'• 4.S.„,„0":_,./
.. ....ft,77....f„.....,ec;;
I 2 2
N\
N‘ . •
. .
•
' Oli ."•:' I\
\,_p 1 • \ l ssle,,,,,,,.;., _ SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION EARTHWORK
/ / ilr
\ WALK LIMITS oP CLEARINCi SUEGRAOE c,Lrfioe-BUIL-Diu,.4.42e---6.: g 1-L.•III
1•\ , \ Li, / eiNSTALL SILT FENCES. C.1Pr^...,...c.,
pil,----z ,0c,47,C.,
O 2 `..0 \,,,,,!;14, , •--"<e .,..4... ,..• ''1.------- -
. • ........,.. a 03 w
ti• 0,, ,,c- \ .,!. .,;..,.... ,=6.7.4-9 3111517E1.TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRuCTiON 15,1“...c.,n1.,...Am...Ea..., , n., - , ..
.. s. ENTFANCE. F LA--76.mi.G.vl 0,1,140 Gr.!ILI.De.."A 14-.1.10 cy
. • .„,-------'r '‘*.''
:-.1),---... • • 1
.2:, .1 -e----- -. N-,XP: 4 CoNsexeCT oee-SiTe DILAINPC•E'ITVEESION
DITCHES prall_C.11-+G.01..10,-,41.1LC-cI ,
os r4.4.-...44.3,o c.,(1.,,,4,S.c.,°:e4-044,r/1",44,200 c.Y.en...c.:•ei) !, r1)•Fl 6 g
SCOPOTRUcr SEDIMENT PONDS VeefiroPLATers 4......-PErn v.i.,......e.e•Jcsi i..1.Cy E6.110-1.A..-M,•011 'CZ rj"k.2.
Fuse/.ouTLers two civeesion levies. PEC04../.C4-1L-r..•541,-4.4.--mo c?u.P.P.4o.nc.4,.....arl
,A,-...ro,,,C_L1660 FOC.CSI0.0,-K.01...C44,1C.K.r6 C
.
T . -', 6 FILL ANO ERAGE SITE TO SUEGRADE ELEVATION.
Oiseueceo AREAS. I C.,:i=orarn."1‘.••==_6-7C T. -=*.•""".'1 a
7SESO
I
A _
• - — 4R1 m'RO,
moo COKTRAcTor TO SWAMI,/OESGAIPTION Or_ ili.cLINC
• YOURS MCI HMIS Or TRUCE OTLEATION TO ITT in C Or - - I - 'F'S'AVO• .r..."'
- . -
_ - I 34510
_
_ MIMI r01 ArrlOYAL ralOr.TO CEKCIICINC MM.- 1"..50' 144,1- A ' .....,
__
-
_ 1/4,01000
•
. . .
•
- - •
. .............7
° ? e,ro (7,) tr,„....,. (ip
(i) c? •Ttrrio ? ? T . z;, ,
. ,.'3 1
x
_.,.._ I
in= .
':4 •:'•''f'.1f,-....r,,,,,L, . IMINININN
MOM
•,..r...1.5 -..111111111 9. c 1
. ,
• --1-11—''-- i
-
' 111111111.116E1 ' : r•3
NalgAili=111:112011119 I 10;113
a...5-1" e.L.e.VAT I o r-1. w -1" eaFFILG er--=‘6,116,4 .', ., 1
. . .
I ,TM1') T 4,,,,, ci) 1-,3,„„T 0.,0
531 "--ftv",,ztz-ii 4f)er'r) Q
(---r) t....Te... ,...ae.
°
; 5„....,....wkl,r L.,,,. ,,,.. .
/.. .
.. . -1 V,....:.
. . .
. I I HMI I I
-- --1, ---31. —'1-11=1". [.':' ' ..
as.ft,i9
_taiillILL--.----7 1
•
=
1 -----a j — /-..:-..-..-..--,•-.- g_.--,— ,..4,—. -.. --_ ,__J am •
_ a ....
..-. /-• l'Ajklitki-•fJOR.TH ELWATioK1 go 4,..,..7....., -1) ®
ci) ,....,..".,_, .,.... ° ,......„,
.„..„2„.,
r.,..-7,
•
_ .
. .. . . [
. 1
, .___ , •
t,_ •
•-• .n.........0.•..,„,„. P...Ki-i...,-- NJ,•c-f H E,Evp.-r I or,
r.)--F)A L. We. al-EA/n-1'1 c4,.1
? 5 7," ®
4 bff) ® 0 0
1r .u..1..... ) ®
5)
. _ •
.•„.
„__, • . • , .
, •
,
. „
. ,.,_ .•rr 0,,,„,,,,,,.
k i
--J—L __. L1
, _0,-- • (Ai -
w v z"EtIrt44":-.= 0 tc Z
PP.I.T..., WES," 11.,... VA"-10 1...1 r",,..1-.".... 5,,L)-1,-1 ..I-Ey...1-10,1 0....-"," e,avn-7-1,,,-,....,a K.7
• rry•r•C:Lt.:I-Z:7' C3, tc'
. .
. .7 ? CI) (....) .
7 T () T
0..„,
< I i
... _
...,1 .
n
. -41
4 :
nii I
i I) CII i
ro.MT IA I. -5,r1-1-1 e L.E..s.efr,$o r--.1 .. ii (I E :
•
. : • ks .
_ .........
_. A5
. . _ . .
-
_ .
. - .
•
•
III
ii'
. III! . .
. . III .
„,,,,,
, um
� „II,
. ,,; 'I
„„,,,,,
, iii
111
I;
,:...
F,� �■■■ n
IIIII r,E� o=ENEIIII 1 u{, =■■■ i °
LI
•
I
P I , mIIII L 1III Z IIIII Z
111
I
HMO _
iMM. I
.6 • — - -
111•
SLOG. 'S EX-MK'DK ELE VATI I.'rKIf5UTio FACILIT'( FOK roe na.
lance mueller 6RUGC :JLU A - C .
D & assooiearc$architects ala ""•`'d
1'1 �ZEnTTON YYA�jHINGTON
130 Wawa!.•...Me w••n.1.11¢2•eon 325 2553 e.s. no ...i.bn e.•.
•
f
lance mueller
& associates PLANNING DIVISION
architects CITY OF RENTON
MAY 2 5 1990
RECEWED
May 244, 1990
Ms. Lenora Blauman
CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DEPT.
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: BRUCE BLUME - SID ELAND DISTRIBUTION
PERMIT #7724
Dear Lenora:
Please revise Jerry Lind's plan check comments, item #1 to read
as follows:
1. An "at risk" fill & grade permit can only be issued when
final approval from the hearing examiner is received. This
permit can also be issued before the appeal period is
complete.
Sincerely,
LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES/ARC TECTS
LX :2
Jesse Wm. Johnson
JJ:lm
cc: Building Department - Jim Hansen
Public Works - David Christensen
130 lakeside • suite 250 • seattle,washington 98122 • 208/325-2553 • fax: [208]328-0554
lanes mueller ale,cal • senior associates:robert olscheweky,eileen furney
associate.:robert fadden,michael galbralth,richard herniah,robert wells
a weshington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects
jmETNo
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
MAY 2 4 1990
May 23 , 1990
RECEIVED
Environmental Review Committee .
Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
Current Planning Division
Community Development Department
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Determination of Nonsignificance
File No. : ECF; SA-112-89 Blume Distribution Facilities
Dear Environmental Review Committee:
Attached for your information is a copy of the comment
letter sent by Metro staff to the applicant of the above
referenced proposal.
Sincerely,
Gregory M. Bush, Manager
Environmental Compliance Division
GMB:lam5257
Attachment
t _J
May 2, 1990
pLANNlNG DlVI
CITY OF Slp�
REAITON
Bush, Roed and Hitchings, Inc. MAY 2 4 1990
2009 Minor Avenue East
Seattle, Washington 98102 �9
� ��® !
Attention: Bob Roed
Dear Mr. Roed:
' Distribution Facility for Bruce Blume Co.
The Municipality has reviewed the design drawings submitted by
your office for the subject project. We offer these comments at
' this time.
1. Pursuant to Metro's utility easement for the ETS pipeline
on subject property, the property owner may utilize the
easement area to install the storm sewer and waterline.
However, in the event Metro must remove, replace, or
relocate the storm and water lines in order to maintain,
remove or replace the ETS pipeline, those costs pertaining
to the storm and waterlines must be borne by the owner of
the storm and waterlines.
2 . The storm and waterlines installed in the Metro utility
easement shall conform to the guidelines set by the City of
Renton.
3 . The building's foundation footing shall be kept out of
Metro's easement.
4 . Please limit the use of heavy equipment over the ETS
pipeline.
5. Contact the undersigned of Metro's Facilities Engineering
Division at 684-1291 a minimum of 72 hours prior to commen-
cing construction in order to allow staff time to arrange
having a Metro inspector on site during construction.
' V trul o r
•
/ r
ichard H. utney
Senior Facility Inspector •
RHP:ae
cc: Matt Harris - 112
5RP0104
AMINE`> :i::::::::.::>::>:.::::::::>::>:: <:: :<:; ::<:>:::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::�::: ::::
:: :: ..:::::::.:..::.::.::.:::::: :. : .:.:...::::.:
. . :ARINCr :::>::s:::!::!:!:.•::!::!:.:::..:::::!::..'.::::...:'.::::.:':::.:::::!...:.1.:'::::.:::::::;:.::.:::::.:::!::.::::::.:::::::':.•::;::;....!:::•':.::::::::!::::::::::::::::..::..i.•.::!::::::i..:::::::!::!:..:::!.::1:.:::::.!:.!:.:!::.:!:::..:::;:::1:::!::::::::i::> :. s: i::: < :<::� ::: ` �: >;:::::
::.::'.:'...:!.::::::i::.::::::::.::.:...!:::!::::::!.:::::'::::.:!:1•::::::::::::..:;:!;f:.:::.:::..::!::.!•.:::'::::'::::::::.:;::::..•.l::
:::GOMMEN:CXNO.. A`T:>:9:::0.0:W : MA Y: 1 :>::199. ..................................:::::::::::::::::...::. .................. .....:.:.:..... ... ::.
:,NI. IP:A. ;::::BUILDDI .G :.,: >:::: :::s::>:::
<::CO.:�:N.CIL::C:� AM�:EI�S: ;:S:�CQI�D:::;�LQQ�: �I;ITO.N::;7yf(J .:C.:. . . ::. ::.::::::..:..:.....:.....:................ ...:. ...
.�?� Bess z���.:..th o
::: :.}i��:::a ��lica i,o....:s::>fiis:fed:�:ar: �i�ri':or. r:�:o:f:�>a,. .licatoii:n:umb:eT:onl 'ari' ::no.�;::.n.e ... ..:.:......:Y....:..:.::..:.. ::..:..
>:in::winch they<:will:::be:heard:::::.Items:.wil1::be;.called:::fo:r::hearirig:::at:::thee discr:etion::::o.f:::the: Hearing
.::...:.. .:
.:.....:::..::.;.
PROJECT NAME: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF;SA-112-89
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a
warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking and service areas, landscaping
and recreational amenities. There is a wetland on the site -- .99 acre portion is proposed to
be filled and the remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project site
is vacant and is zoned for manufacturing park use. The property is located at 601 Monster
Road.
.:...:..........
: . .CIT:Y ,ioki:RN.r.±.0omi i. �< ? �#'• >�> :i,.: �,. �:
.. .. ...................................„ .. ..................................... ... . ..... .. ............
• ;:;:::.:CURRENT3s>P :..::: ::.:..::.:.:V:I'''I`�:"`': :<'•:<' :::<.>'::'.::: >: :: Riiiiimi* :;::>:
::::::;::: ....:::::::::::::::::::::::;:::•:::•:...:::..... >:::............::LANNI2rG;.....IV S.ION:.:::.::•:•:::•::.::.;.:•:::. ::•:.:;:•::.:•:•::•»:;•: ........�
AVIT .b�':.:5.g..Rv
• on 'the . 7 day of , 19 Fe, I .
deposited in the mails of ti'fe United States a s aled
e velopecontai i g 0
documents . This information was .sent to:
• Name Representing
•
7: moo!LS4,Z,Z4 •
)arvaEs 1,4-ezi PE • - • C&JS.PQT i..2 },v,r►74 ...r
0 4111E5 GrRoPRISaN •Bieuce 824id»e lig dill pa AI
Y
Sa tD E d; 1 - , . .571.d Clove/ _Tile.
P u.L LC_Lz AI d /ic.f/2n
•
• 4E4/2f/ ,/Ia�/9rra5 $Sfa.t/t, Au,dia.t.174nl. Scaif'4-
. n7 dr,Apfie MIA h Ap7'. o la;L d L;4-
•
�. ROccera 12. a nDUe S,'c€ ELq,,,d Z.ric...
•
• (Signature of Sender) • ,,i /).2 7
L� J
Subscribed and sworn to me this 7, day of
19 qe .
. LX9
. 1
Notary -P in and for the
Sta e Washington residing
at
therein.
ro ct..:: m
::.
ae::>::::::: ::
roj ect N:umb.er
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
APPLICANT: Bruce Blume& Company
FILE NUMBER: ECF;SA-112-89
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S.W.
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a
warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking and service areas, landscaping and
recreational amenities. There is a wetland on the site -- a .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and
the remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project site is vacant and is zoned
for Manufacturing Park use.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner of Record: Bruce Blume& Company
2. Applicant: Bruce Blume& Company
3. Existing Zoning: M-P,Manufacturing Park
4. Existing Zoning in the Area: M-P, Manufacturing Park;P-1,Public Use;
O-P, Office Park
5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park/Multiple Options
6. Size of Property: 15.8 acres (this development only; total site
equals 40 acres).
7. Access: Oakesdale Ave.S.W. and Monster Road
S.W.
8. Land Use: Vacant land
9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Vacant land
East: Manufacturing Park uses (Container
Corporation of America) and the Metro
Treatment Plant.
South: Metro Treatment Plant
West: Fort Dent Park
C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND:
Action File Ordinance Date
Initial annexation --- 4086 9-30-87
D. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1 TTtilititc
•
PRELIMINARY REPORT'i u IRE HEARING EXAMINER
Blume Distribution Facility
PUBLIC HEARING
May 15, 1990
Page 2
2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements.
3. Transit:, This site is not served by Metro transit.
4. Schools: N/A.
5. Recreation: Fort Dent Park is immediately west of the subject site.
E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1. Section 4-31-25,Manufacturing Park (M-P) District.
2. Section 4-31-33,Site Plan Review.
F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY
DOCUMENT:
1. Green River Valley Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 31-
50). The subject site is located immediately north of the area defined as the Green River
Valley planning area,but the site appears to have many characteristics in common with nearby
properties that are inside the Green River Valley planning area.
2. Industrial Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 18-19).
3. Environmental Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs.8-11).
4. Urban Design Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 11-14).
G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. The applicant is seeking site plan approval for a warehouse/office complex located on a 16
acre portion of a 40 acre parcel. The now vacant parcel is located in the Green River Valley
Area of the City; the site lies within the 100 year floodplain and hosts several wetlands
(approximately 4.5 acres of wetland exist on the portion of the site which is to be developed;
an additional approximately 1.5 acres of wetland exists on the site outside of the development
envelope).
The Blume Distribution complex is planned to consist of two discrete structures.
Building"A", at 210,300 square feet will include +/- 192,300 square feet of warehouse space,
of which approximately 35,300 square feet (+/- 20%) is to be utilized by Container
Corporation for storage of cardboard containers and the remaining approximately 157,000
square feet (+/-80%) is to be utilized for storage of alcoholic beverages. The additional +/-
18,000 square feet.of Building"A"will be used for office space.
Building "B", at 49,100 square feet, is planned to be used primarily as a warehouse; it will
include some office space as well. At present, there is no contracted tenant for this building,
so that precise uses and space designations are not new available.
The complex will also include a series of preserved/enhanced wetlands, passive and active
recreation areas, and parking facilities.
2. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21.C., 1971,
as amended), a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, was issued for the project by
the Environmental Review Committee on February, 1990,with conditions#a - th inclusive)
PRELIMINARY REPORT 1 v t HE HEARING EXAMINER
Blume Distribution Facility
PUBLIC HEARING
May 15, 1990
Page 3
1990. The Determination of Non-Significance was retained by the Committee, with the eight
initially required conditions, and with an additional four conditions (#i - #1 inclusive) listed
below.
a) That the applicant provide a revised wetland landscaping plan, to include a greater
number,size and diversity of native wetland plants, subject to approval by the City, by
the Department of Ecology and by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in advance of
site plan review.
b) That the applicant provide a statement agreeing to limit filling operations on the site
to a maximum of .99 acres of the wetland and an approved amount of dryland fill,
using fill material approved by the City, as well as fill methods/monitoring systems
approved by the City and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in advance of the
issuance of site preparation/building permits. (Note: The wetland fill plan has been
approved by the Department of Ecology).
c) That the applicant directly provide regional traffic'improvements as stipulated by the
Transportation Systems Division or make a voluntary contribution to the Grady Way
TBZ in the amount of$254,345.65 ($185.00 per trip).
Note: The applicant will also need to provide an off-site improvements plan, including
streetlighting, curbs, sidewalks, gutters and undergrounding of utility lines, subject to the
approval of the Public Works Department. (See"Note#B below.)
d) That the applicant provide a TMP, including carpooling/vanpooling, preferred
parking, pedestrian linkages to adjacent Oakesdale Avenue, subject to the approval
of METRO and the Transportation Systems Division.
e) That the applicant provide an ingress/egress plan (e.g. driveway location, dimensions
and design) as required by "Access Management to Streets and Highways" or "ITE
Transportation and Land Development Standards" or as recommended by a licensed
transportation engineer in order to 'ensure safe, efficient access for large trucks
hauling products from the site to the adjacent heavily-traveled Oakesdale Avenue.
(Note#1: All traffic mitigation plans [Conditions#c through#e, inclusive] must be approved
and fees (if established) paid in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits
for the development.)
(Note#2: The development will generate additional traffic [estimated at 83 trips per day] to
the nearby intersection of Martin Luther King Way and 68th Street,where level of service "E"
already e)dsts. Because this intersection is under the jurisdiction of King County, the City will
notify County officials. The applicant may be called upon by the County to participate in
signal warrants at that intersection; the applicant has been so advised.)
(Note #3: The Washington State Department of Transportation may call for additional
mitigation measures if more than 10 trips occur on any state highway during p.m. peak hours
during construction or operations).
f) That the applicant: 1) provide a revised site plan which elevates all structures a
minimum of two (2) feet above the defined floodplain elevation of nineteen (19) feet;
OR, 2) provide secondary containment for all structures to minimize leakage of
damaged products (e.g. from fire or flood) to protect the underlying terrain against
contamination, over the life of the project; OR 3) provide a "hold harmless"
agreement ensuring that the municipality will not be responsible for any damage
occurring to the site or developments thereupon resulting from flooding on the
property. Plans and/or agreements shall be subject to the approval of the Fire
Prevention Bureau and the Public Works Department (agreements shall also be
approved by the City Attorney), and shall be provided in advance of the issuance of
site preparation/building permits.
g) That the applicant shall provide a storm water drainage management plan,in advance
of the issuance of site preparation/building permits, subject to approval of the Public
Works Department, including: 1) on-site detention with 100 year/7 day design (with
design specifications provided in a supplementary soils engineering report) (*); 2)
Type II catch basins with baffled oil/water separators; and 3) biofiltration swales for
storm water prior to entrance into the wetlands (fire lanes adjacent to wetlands will
require adequate biofiltering buffer strips). .
t
PRELIMINARY REPORT _ _'HE HEARING EXAMINER
Blume Distribution Facility
PUBLIC HEARING
May 15, 1990
Page 4
(*) There is an approved Soils Engineering Report on file, but because staff is recommending
a 100 year/7 day design system, rather than the customarily required 25 year/2 day design
system, owing to site characteristics -- e.g., elevations, wetlands -- the Report will need to be
modified with respect to design specifications prior to the issuance of building permits.
h) That the applicant provide a construction mitigation plan including the following
components: 1) an erosion control plan; 2) a plan for protection of the wetland area
to be retained while the area to be eliminated is being filled; 3) a plan for wheel-
washing of all construction vehicles prior to leaving the site; 4) water down the site
periodically to control dust and debris; 5) a plan for restriction of hauling routes and
hours of hauling operations; 6) a plan for signage of site and structures during
construction to facilitate emergency service provision; and 7) a $5,000.00 cash bond
for street clean-up.
In addition,the City requests:
a) That the applicant make a voluntary contribution in the amount of$5,000.00
to the development of the Master Trails Plan in the area of the site.
b) That the applicant provide a recorded easement to establish a connection
from the site to the proposed adjacent Master Trail, for use by project
employees, subject to approval by the Landscape Planner and the Parks and
Recreation Department.
Note#A: Modifications to the site plan (architectural design), the exterior illumination plan,
on-site recreation plan and dryland landscaping plan (increased plantings; thematic integrity)
and landscaping maintenance bond will be required in conjunction with site plan review.
Note #B: Specific plans/specifications for on-site and off-site improvements, in compliance
with Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, Public Works Standards (Storm Water, Traffic,
Water Flow and Fire Flow) and related regulations, will be required at the time of site
preparation/building permit application.
i) That the applicant provide $4,000.00 as a fair share payment toward the Washington
State Department of Transportation project for the signalization of the (SR 900)
Martin Luther King Way/68th Avenue South intersection, subject to the approval of
the City of Renton Public Works Department and the King County Public Works
Department.
j) That the applicant provide in-kind replacement (and enhancement) of wetlands to
compensate for the .99 acre of emergent wetland which is to be filled.
Replaced/enhanced wetland shall be between .55 acre and .99 acre and is to be
connected to existing wetland areas located on the northwest portion of now-defined
Parcel #4. Wetland replacement/enhancement plans are subject to approval by the
City's Landscape Planner and concurrence of the State Department of Wildlife;
replacement/enhancement shall be achieved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
k) That the applicant allow an annual inspection by the City of each and all of the
wetlands areas on now-defined Parcel #2 and now defined Parcel #4 of the subject
property, to ensure that these areas are being properly protected and maintained,with
inspection rights to be provided through an easement to allow access to the site and a
covenant to ensure that the easement runs with the land,to be valid for the life of the
project. These documents are to be approved by the City Attorney and provided prior
to the public hearing for site plan approval.
1) That the applicant, prior to public hearing for site plan approval, in order to ensure
protection of the effluent transfer system, obtain from METRO, approval of
construction plans and provide an easement and covenant to run with the land for
METRO access to maintain and repair the sewer line, subject to approval by
METRO and the Renton City Attorney.
3. Various City departments have reviewed and commented on the proposal, as revised. The
majority of staff reviewers recommended approval of the proposed warehouse/office complex
with conditions. Staff comments are attached; the content of these comments has been
addressed in the text of the report.
Ii
PRELIMINARY REPORT',.1HE HEARING EXAMINER
Blume Distribution Facility
PUBLIC HEARING
May 15, 1990
Page 5
4. SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA - Section 4-31-25 (D,1) lists ten criteria that the
Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a
decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following:
a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan,its elements and policies;
The proposed warehouse/office complex is permitted under the Comprehensive Plan
Map designation for Manufacturing Park/Multiple Options on this site.
The planned/recommended development is generally compatible with
Comprehensive Plan elements established for Industrial Uses, such as Objective
VIA. calling for creation of viable industrial areas; Policy VIA.1. calling for
developments to be compatible with adjacent land uses; and Policy VIA.3. calling for
industrial developments to be accessible to major transportation corridors. Similarly,
this complex is generally compatible with Plan elements established for Urban
Design, including Policy IIIA.3. which calls for vacant land surrounded by developed
land to be given priority for development;Policy III.C.1.which calls for landscaping to
enhance structures, parking lots and property boundaries; Policy III.C.3. which calls
for landscaping buffers between use areas; Policy III.C.5. which calls for landscaping
and maintenance of planting strips along the public right-of-way; and Policy III.C.6.
which calls for common landscaping themes within an area.
Finally, the proposed/recommended development addresses Comprehensive Plan
Environmental Elements, including those calling for protection of open space (I.C.),
preservation/enhancement of wildlife habitats (I.D.), retention of native vegetation
(I.E.), enhancement of natural resources (I.G. - Surface Drainage Objective, I.H.
Waterbodies Objective, and I.J. Marshes, Bogs and Swamps Objective), and
protection of flood plains (I.I.).
b. Conformance with existing land use regulations;
The proposed complex, including structures, and attendant landscaping, wetland
enhancement areas, recreation areas, parking facilities and access routes, essentially
addresses standards for Manufacturing Park uses (4-31-25), for Landscaping (4-31-
34), and for Parking and Loading (4-14). Minor modifications to plans may be
necessary to achieve full compliance with the Site Plan Review Ordinance (4-31-33).
Staff note that, at present, all components of the proposed complex are located on a
single parcel. However, the proponent has applied, in a separate action, to segregate
the 40 acre property into four discrete parcels (*).
Assuming successful segregation, Building "A" would be located on a new Parcel #2
and Building "B" would be located on a new Parcel #4. In order to achieve
compliance with City code, with segregation, each portion of the complex has been
generally designed so that the majority of City development standards are achieved
for the discrete parcels (e.g. setbacks, parking facilities, landscaping). In the event
that segregation does occur, there would be a need to provide an access easement to
Parcel#4 from Parcel #2. Additionally, an agreement would be necessary to ensure
appropriate responsibility for/maintenance of wetland areas which transcend parcel
boundaries. (Lots#1 and#3 would be accessible from Monster Road.)
(*) Because the proposed parcels are each designed to be greater than five acres, the
proposed subdivision may be processed directly by King County, based upon County
and City regulations. Although, this action is exempt from a requirement for
consideration/approval by the City of Renton, the segregation application is currently
being reviewed by the City for accuracy of legal description and for technical
compliance with appropriate City regulations.
c. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and uses;
Potential impacts to surrounding properties have been identified by staff with respect
to aesthetics,land use, natural environment, traffic circulation (G.4.f), noise, light and
glare (G.4.h), and public services (G.4.i).
The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance -
Mitigated on February 18, 1990, amended on April 11, 1990, with conditions
developed to address the above-defined impacts (see G.2.) as they would affect
PRELIMINARY REPORT'iu fHE HEARING EXAMINER
Blume Distribution Facility
PUBLIC HEARING
May 15, 1990
Page 6
nearby properties. Similarly, conditions which may be established in conjunction with
this site plan review are intended to mitigate areal impacts from the proposed
development.
(1) Land Use/Aesthetics
The Green River Valley Area Plan calls for the development of industrial
uses, such as the proposed warehouse/office complex, in this section of the
community. Proximity of similar, compatible uses and accessibility to major
thoroughfares also enhance the appropriateness of the site for the planned
industrial use.
The proposed development includes two individual structures which are
generally similar in purpose and scale to nearby industrial developments.
Proposed/recommended architectural features (e.g. structural design, multi-
colored concrete finishing materials, window treatment), setbacks, and
improvements, such as landscaping, also serve to enhance compatibility of
this use with nearby office park complexes, such as Washington Technical
Center, and provide a pleasant vista for commuters using adjacent roadways
and visitors to nearby Fort Dent Park.
Exterior lighting is generally appropriate in design,location and scale. Some
modifications to this plan will be recommended to adequately illuminate the
site while mitigating impacts to nearby properties (e.g. right-of-way,
neighboring land uses). Proposed sign locations for the complex are
generally acceptable; some modifications may be required to provide
adequate information if segregation is achieved and/or to accommodate
specific developments in Building "B". Such plans should be approved by the
City.
(2) Natural Environment
As noted previously in this report, the subject property is located in a 100
year floodplain includes sizeable wetland areas.
Structures on this site must be located above the underlying 100 year
floodplain and improved with containment systems/storm water management
systems so that any damage from flooding or accidental spills of warehoused
materials will be confined to the subject property, thereby minimizing
impacts upon nearby private and public properties.
Upland (dryland) planting plans have been designed to be coordinated with
those used on neighboring properties, and to be compatible with wetland
landscaping. Minor modifications may be suggested to the upland
landscaping plans, so that size and number of plantings are more appropriate
to their various locations on the site.
d. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses,
Potential impacts to the site have similarly been identified by staff with respect to
aesthetics, land use, natural environment, traffic circulation (G.4.f), noise, light and
glare (G.4.h), and public services (G.4.i).
The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-
Mitigated on February 18, 1990, amended on April 11, 1990, with conditions
developed to address the above-defined impacts (see G.2.) as they would affect the
subject property. Similarly, conditions which may be established in conjunction with
this site plan review are intended to mitigate on-site impacts.
(1) Land Use/Aesthetic
The subject site appears to be appropriate for the proposed development.
For example, the size and terrain of the site is suitable to support the planned
(or recommended) warehouse/office complex, and to accommodate service
areas,recreational amenities and a large enhanced wetland.
The proponent's proposed site plan includes structures which are of a large
size, but which are consistent in architectural theme and scale with one
.
PRELIMINARY REPORT T -HE HEARING EXAMINER
Blume Distribution Facility
PUBLIC HEARING
May 15, 1990
Page 7
another, and which are well-separated on the site, to provide some sense of
open space. Design features-- such as building orientation, window location
-- are intended to provide a functional, reasonably attractive working
environment.
Upland (dryland) landscaping, and active/passive recreation areas are
planned and/or will be recommended to further improve the attractiveness
of the site. Finally, the planned view points from which the enhanced
wetlands can be observed provide an unusual and desirable visual amenity as
well.
Modifications may be recommended to the exterior lighting plan to improve
illumination to improve safety and attractiveness of the site for employees
and visitors, and for fauna feeding at the on-site wetlands.
(2) Natural Environment
The applicant will be taking particular mitigating measures for filling,
protection, and enhancement of existing wetlands, as well as creating new
wetlands on site. Specifically, the applicant will be filling less than one acre
of wetland on this property, under proposed Building "A" (potential future
Lot#2), and will be providing replacement wetlands for that filled portion by
adding to existing wetlands southwest of Building "B" (potential future Lot
#4). Additionally, the remaining wetlands between Buildings "A" and "B"
and the existing/augmented wetlands southwest of Building "B" will be
enhanced with new wetland plantings, ponds, and biofiltering swales in an
effort to provide appropriate storm drainage management systems for the
site and to ensure a continuing hospitable habitat for native flora and fauna
(e.g. Great Blue Heron and red-tailed hawks nest near the property, and bald
eagles have been occasionally sighted in the area).
e. Conservation of area-wide property values;
The proposed development is not expected to have a negative impact on property
values since the industrial complex will be: 1) utilizing properties which are now
vacant; 2) located in an area in which such uses are generally appropriate and
desirable; 3) designed to be compatible with one another, as well as with
developments on neighboring residential and commercial properties; and 4) planned
to be compatible in form and function to the adjacent Monster Road/Oakesdale
corridor. Finally, in conjunction with this development, the proponent will be
enhancing the naturally occurring and augmented wetlands on the site.
f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation;
The proposed industrial warehouse complex, when fully developed, is anticipated to
generate approximately 1410 ADWVTE (including truck transfers, employee trips,
and visiting vendors).
Traffic impacts from this development may be considerable, however, staff believe
that mitigation can be adequately achieved through measures established by the
Environmental Review Committee through direct regional improvements or by
contribution to the Grady Way Transportation Benefit District, through payment of
assessed fees for improvements to the Martin Luther King Way/68th Avenue South
intersection (slated for 1991-1993), through the development of a TMP, and through
Code stipulated on-site and off-site improvements (e.g. ingress/egress points, curbs,
sidewalks,gutters, street lighting).
g. Provision of adequate light and air;
The warehouse/office complex has been proposed/recommended to be generally
designed and sited so that structures are generally well-separated from one another
and/or are oriented to provide a functional working environment,with good light and
air circulation, and attractive view corridors. Similarly, structures are adequately
distant from site boundaries to protect air and light circulation on nearby properties.
Finally, the development has been designed so that structures are sufficiently
separated to allow for adequate light, air and open space to accommodate flora and
fauna living in and/or feeding at those wetlands.
II
PRELIMINARY REPORT'i v i HE HEARING EXAMINER
Blume Distribution Facility
PUBLIC HEARING
May 15, 1990
Page 8
h. Mitigation of noise, odors,and other harmful or unhealthy conditions;
The proposed warehouse/office facility is anticipated to generate some noise, odor
(e.g. fuel oils), and, perhaps, transitory air pollution, by virtue of planned
stocking/storage and trucking transport activities. Because the project is similar in
type and scope to neighboring uses, and because the Blume Distribution Center is
generally planned so that structures, truck loading/circulation systems, employee
parking, and other features are well-coordinated with abutting industrial and office
uses,those impacts are not anticipated to be significant to nearby sites.
The distance between the site and nearby Fort Dent Park is anticipated to limit
impacts to that recreation area.
In order to protect the wetland area (and the fauna living and/or feeding here), the
proponent has designed the complex to orient employee working areas and trucking
activity areas away from the wetlands.Additionally, plantings are designed to provide
a visual buffer between the structures and the wetland habitat area to protect resident
and visiting fauna.
Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and
Public services and public utilities are generally available to serve the site, with
improvements recommended in the Determination of Non-Significance (See G.2.),
together with a combination of standard improvements required by regulation and
special improvements required as a result of specific site characteristics.
For example, Police Department resources and Fire Department resources are
adequate to serve the proposed complex, with appropriate accesses, signage, building
identification,illumination and standard improvements.
Note is made of the fact that area water flow for fire service is not adequate, as it is,
to serve the development as designed. The applicant is working with the Fire
Prevention Bureau and the Public Works Department to either increase water flow to
the site, or to improve the interior of the structures (e.g. an increased number of fire
walls) so that adequate fire control systems can be achieved within existing Uniform
Fire Code regulations.
Public recreation areas do exist in the area (e.g. Fort Dent Park) and the City of
Renton does plan to extend the Master Trails Plan in the vicinity of the site. The
applicant has been asked to voluntarily contribute to the Master Trails Plan, through
the provision of access to the Trail through this site for project employees.
Water mains and sanitary sewer lines are currently available to serve the site with
appropriate connections/system improvement fees.
Storm water management systems can be achieved appropriately for the site, with
special measures established in conjunction with environmental review(See G.2.), and
subject to approval by the Public Works Department. These measures (e.g. 100
year/7 day detention, biofiltration) are designed to address terrain features (e.g.
wetlands, floodplains) and to ensure the preservation/enhancement of the subject
property as well as protection of neighboring parcels. For example, the wetlands,
surrounded with filtration swales, will serve as a major storm water detention area, a
habitat area, and a passive recreational amenity for employees.
Street improvements, including off-site adjacent sidewalks, curbs, gutters and street
lighting, will also be required to be installed by the developer, as mandated by Code,
with plans to be approved by the Public Works Department.
j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight.
Staff view this development as having a positive impact in the Valley. This
warehouse/office complex should be compatible with nearby industrial, office and
public service developments. The wetlands enhancement program provided by the
proponent should serve as a model for similar amenities in this area. Employees may
help to support nearby commercial enterprises (restaurants, personal services) and
public facilities (e.g.Fort Dent Park).
PRELIMINARY REPORT'I HE HEARING EXAMINER
Blume Distribution Facility
PUBLIC HEARING
May 15, 1990
Page 9
H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner determine in favor of the Blume Distribution Company
application (File # SA 112-89) for site plan approval for the proposed warehouse/office complex,
subject to the following conditions:
1. That the applicant comply with all conditions established in the Determination of Non-
Significance as issued on February 18, 1990 and as amended on April 11, 1990.
2. That the applicant provide a revised exterior lighting plan which increases pedestrian-scaled
illumination fixtures in the parking areas and which directs that lighting away from the wetland
areas to protect the wildlife habitat. This plan is to be approved by the Planning Division prior
to issuance of building permits.
3. That the applicant agree to submit a revised signage plan, in advance of issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for Building "B", to ensure that signage is adequate to serve both
portions of the development and is consistent with Sign Code requirements.This plan is to be
approved by the Planning Division.
4. That the applicant submit final upland (dryland) landscape plans which delineate type,number
and size of plantings which have been approved by the City's Landscape Planner, based upon
amendments to draft plans submitted on May 4, 1990,by no later than the May 15, 1990 public
hearing for this project.
5. That the applicant install all upland (dryland) landscaping on this site in conjunction with the
construction of, and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for, the first structure
to be installed on the property as a whole, or any parcel thereof.
6. That the applicant develop and improve all wetland areas, as stipulated by the Determinations
of Non-Significance of February 18, 1990 and April 11, 1990, in conjunction with the
construction of, and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for, the first structure
to be installed on the property as a whole, or any parcel thereof.
7. That the applicant provide a landscaping maintenance bond in the amount of$3,000.00 for the
upland (dryland) landscaping, to be approved by the City Attorney, to be valid for a period of
three(3) years from the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the first structure in this
complex to be occupied.
8. That the applicant provide a landscaping maintenance bond in the amount of $6,000.00 for
wetlands plantings, to be approved by the City Attorney, to be valid for a period of five (5)
years from the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the first structure in this complex
to be occupied.
9. That the applicant provide a restrictive covenant to be valid for the life of any or all
components of the project, assigning responsibility for protection of each and all of the
wetlands areas on the entire parcel in the event of segregation and/or sale of any or all of the
subject property(ies). This document is to be approved by the City Attorney, and duly
recorded with King County.
•
,'Z'"�1' I A 12.. wnw.� _f l 19 18
•
•
M. :; ►'� -�i \\ Zo F P U D —l I I—
• a�,`+�y� • • c. 7:2
il
•...; ' 'a 3 ' ' • \ •
fi} "'•,`'�`"Z:': ABANDONED '-4. . . I
p I. �;,
7
•
). . • .• _ .7-- _..... L-:.-. . ,r . - ' - ''. \' -
rlrFi::V: s� • 1 •
1.
it . .:
rzt
1.:1„.i.:,.,..,,.••,...,:.F,•,;•:,:t..:.:.;" • \.. , ,.... . \ .
oP
.'_ '`.... _ _"..s.„ .,_ :.,,,..,.,,/..: •,5i
_.�.-}- .. M E T R 0, \ ..•
. 1
1,I
4.
.1,:,'".i...; ...":......;..).:'', . 'l.:.•' .:• • . ...... .. :'*:". \
':::-' .•': ." "'::'-',.; • • .; : :•• : :.:•:'..:':. •'• p ... 1 ,..
1 T„
6 ,,w,,, r :.:•:.• • ::,•_ .... ..,•:____ — —— - - ——'—- — -- -- —
._
.., _
._
-7f/.....-- . • : . \ . . . ,.. ,
.,i1..• / sd.
. , .....,:,:.....:4••••..:. ./,/' • -.... . N N \-• , .
. _____ .. . • .. •\ .. .. : •il:- •/.1s. • ....7,--- ,,._____._, ..,_________________-•---•.-' ‘ ______.___ __--_:
:,,,z,;ir.k.... .: . ,,...7 _____.--,H_-_....-:-:.=-:,_—_—_--..:- / '
\* ' ..' ' .•\,'1,,r5,. .
��{` �� ...'•• •----":7'.:.• ti..: .il. . . ....-
•
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
• • SA;ECF-112-89 •
•
•
•
•
APPLICANT Bruce Blume and Company • TOTAL AREA 16 acres •
•
PRINCIPAL ACCESS Monster Road
•
EXISTING ZONING M-P
EXISTING USE Vacant and Warehouse/Office •
PROPOSED USE Warehouse/Office buildings
•
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
COMMENTS Located at 601 Monster Road
•
1I '
•
• •
- - ......1..7 4 .:. ........•
•.."-- • • •..'• e • ei.' ..
' Ill , ..
. :o.
1 •goo II••:$ ......•
11101111 IL / \,-- ----1.! -
111111 11, ,OPiolO :. • • • • • •
• • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • ''.',- •.. •••.,
• Al • •?„- -:::::5•' ::
I • • • • • • • • • IIN • • , ... .:::
mi , . . \ifilifigr .
• • • • • • • • • • • •• '.- ::::
EMI •"?
11111 iii..'h:`,4,111-BEI-iik:k. III 11111 IR • 4,0 non ti *ieF::.1. •• • • • • • • • • • • \•:•:• -., .,
,.
111 144 Eri .oc......... ,.„..,„:„.10::..,.s.,,.:..".,:::...,:.:.:.: .:....:.:,.:.....,:.::,::.:.:„.„.,.,,r..,,,,...,:.:
......
.,..
,iii,
......
„„,,,,
,__,......
:g.g iti:: t. .........
........
g:.......„.:.:.:.,. .... ,4..,::.. :.:.:.:.„.:.,,,,,„::,
.,00. .0. . .,.,
, ..„.....,.,.,. .,... ......0.0006.00,0000. •• • • •
:,.. ..:
.0,„:„.,,g:..0.,. ...
. •..
. ..,,,...,....„.....•,„ogp,,pg0•
. . ....
.„...
_ ,..., • ,,..,,,,,gg.g. A. • • rolnizo:i •'•'•'•'',•' .'
f---.
r ....,....„4.N •..II
_r- AI 16"ignoi\
ik 111,
-._ ! - ism 00o0o0o0o 0, • • • ,N;M:E'ii4.,1:::W:1;el • • • • •• 7,
c 0-3•• 000000000 • • • Wiaefi:KM:lij 0)Allk 0..,:-.-? •:At..i.go,°,ogogogo.7 • • • 11/4"-Tr•ra===...ma 1 • • • •
I• • •464
SIM
'-- i IN g'ogog.01.0g• Vo'cos,o'go*• ....EI N.
Ali gUrgrigg':..'f .. . - , allil • • 1
.il• 1 f•--,A:•.,.). ;,Ar i
i
::::.. ogoNc,..000. . .0• . ,_ .,,,..,0..--,,-.7.--71 ..
l'i.•• AIN •::
___----- ...., * —1 :::.••• 000c,00dgog000• 7°goo• .. 0 pi::
:::::•• 00000p000c,o0o . °c/e,• illi
;,. j III ...;i,\0. .*''''°''' /11::: 11 iggiligoVg7:111 :I Orilittrijgf...00•00.:
Pr
_ t...
ble-01.1,. . 0 .01020-;•§14.41 §..__,A1411 .,...,,
._._
7.,.1.7.. , -......w ......,.... . kteam
ii, ,./....
•
.5,..I., c.„4..,:..... k
11/416170-1...erft."`Matini tin":-.11;;1.-L:•mo ''', IiiiiIVA III!' .-i-' Irwilir 1.
• - 1.••••-•,:•-•;;o.',1-,..-1•Viztlitto
\ ,..r.,3`,,•;. migramkomomogog• Imi@mit,-.4...,...4,... . .,...e.• ....
' "Q.)`;')''z'.1'.`kl• ••,. 4.6 1PayirAll dc II= .. co.. ...i, . im••••••-.4, , i.c.i ......., c. .
\ , 1)", , • ::,
• • ..c.-• .... 'r i,',
• • ..3*..' ,:iii::i*i:i::::•:,.. ' .3). , ' MI" .°•°g°2°g°g°g. k:1111011:111M .fd:V' ..'•':::SP'ar\',1''
06.!.,%.% in= , ' •III.LIMMIIIIII.dia:0• . . 4.46440,0,..
--... \ . o 0-;.• •
• .,0 . :::.::::::i:g:::ii:i::i:::::::•:•.... '` :''...q.',/,'•19(C.'c9^.,.• NM. Val°°°°°11...b.7i71111Magek111:111161:11,°°°9›./-- AIME
/I • . .. :1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•:•....:1• ).1•ii.4 , ..C.C(1., ....................„...........„.„.....„.„............Nnn„n 3. 0:ccgsrl---4141,14..! ..unitIon:01:0, ,.---..7.....
• ,..;.,.4:::i:i:i:i:iii:iiiiiiiiiiiii::::::::::::::::::.1:::,...:1:_.,•\,.,..,.,..:4%4),:.„,,.. irt,
_,.. , .:::::.,::::::::::::::::::::::::.... l_r_„,,,. ....,....r._, ,• ,_,„. ..„..E`..
'` ' *i*::::::::::::::::•:•:•:.: •••13:10 ••`,eekl 4400pt .11•11•011-44°°°°11111117111;iiiiiilta/i .7".9•?•I•ca • 'allii..
11:11K:;g:/11111 MIIMIINIIIIIW "•%•'••• ..•'•"V.-'€'t•''Il'
IIIIMIIIIIIIIN
Il• IWIIIIIMII??.....IBMILIt al!!!!!!! ,',.. ;',1',-;:,":..fr(IPZ:t
••,,,•:;,........ .-..... .
11:12 .fir;':.'11C' g•ejla;kinill '''''...:;::::-7:••-•'••••-•'•;•••••••;.:.7.511Pardi mum= fe•$:::::••::'0". 4"1.149 ",‘•,•;.•• '''''''''' 's-1:.‘''r
wuming::::x::*.::•,•- .thri• • ,c.tn,...c-0 ,,. , -,;,.-
__ c3?,....0i::*i:i:1:::i:::i:::::::::::::.:.:.:•:•:•:::::: "I'm , 0%,••• vo.
VIIII: •,..:• .,4:;:a;:., . b. • •,,-.;,:;-,„;• .....-.•
-•......._ •••-t•:•:.:•:•:•:•:•• ,- 7, .- ..:,-;..2.?;..-,-_-_-_-_-_-__ •,,,,....,•••'•••••:•:*il::*i:i**i*.i:i:Mi::,.''
....•••••••• - • •
------...„---___:::,,........ •:tNi:::::• . • o!..., :::,; .1.!.•:`;'•.-•S'. ---—•-•---....„,.,, ,•••:::*::i:i:i:i..i:i*:i*if, r2,11p,'„orate•AIR poii ,,,,,,c,(3,:, •.•
---„N
, , =„•••.......„ ,2.... ‘',..::,' ....
:c.•.\g..,:v,.r1 4..-...4J.;:'i c%4t.7(C,•.,ef!:3--.7,,f::..3.1..•AN,•,...•.A[..t4,i4,.•-.•-r-.,7.'.,„ec0c..:..,,b rv:i•.j•o6s:.„,
1.ri{.).,.X),7,„.,.•.,'z..\.t_....•.,7..\•.-r,••:i„-•i•,..,:•;-•,\,\\,2 74•1.„i-:,....,;_-:...0__....t.iA.d_.?..'.:v-.4;•,s'l..•t oo I.•t..10 o..,•0c,•....••.o_0......_oo0_01:.:0o•'.oo0_..7.00oi0.•oo_...6o0:_,00 i.-s.01o0.z.,-00%:..•-o...•„oo..•.0o0.0.•oo 0.-,.:..o0.3.-,,,„,:o0-o..0o0..__.00'oo01,-•,_:0o__o.1o.-
—;•..:1..:::...,:.;4•i:.
„._—._,4.A.:—:_-e—:_g--nL 4.-L:s__3_4:_-_4:,:4._-=f••o_0_=_r-7=__'a_-__\I=__p__llI77_-_______7____-__.1iLo.p1 i2m.1r iMAInoI:NNIv:.■mp.t■:■.m;me■
t r.:w■m:11.g!I■mN..•7..0.■M 1.U ...■F.11aMM.■mI.■..:/
. 1 _ _ __ _ -oo!/i:iA2EAN.•:0-k0.w•.:--
.xNk00c:.2I7:.:mgi:1,iiT
::-•A*•$:-•...:N_.•::•::-i::1p::!N4'.r':.::::,,:',0o:,,,.:,.E:::.:R::i:%::,.:mi..g,:9........i11i,NL7 as.,_..(':i s AF/t i:rA:::'..:.PA::N::1'"i:::E:..:
:.'::•:.:,%:..:.::.•:.;.::-:.:i:,]::,:i::::•:.::':,,.'hIII'r.•?Ih.?:.•,V,Ii:,,:l',l/‘...1.,.„...,;.,,.•t•c'.0. ..4c...'.•0.:e.00:7•+'.s..0c,0.,.00o,;.„.,.0.!.7.
•
; - . . 7 ..•';,
1.'.
••;•:.t:',c,. ,,:_r?
.....-0,,,.-•,,,.-
'c';?•
• mow.-- .....og *i::::::::::::::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•'•; ... ,,,...;,.,•' ,,,,7.,‘::13.-0,
yi'. ;S\'. 'Vape.°.°„.-..•:e..•.• 1-- .0_111-0-:cup.deatidg . ,, ,n, (i.. ,.,. . ,,:: ?:::. 0,
imemparn...;:..,.........f.:...,.....,.....„..:.:
,..„ ,,000;•.• • • ill---7-___•-_-___ _____-=_---------
• ' • i'•••• •-..t.....----;.,\ ----7---. -..r__ -7:71&11,9 41111milimirc.:.: ;g:: :. :•g,•.i! ,...'i -,;..,...,-,...
--4.1" .....doe'ln••••••.. --- 611:1 GOOlilliiii.'N .4)a '1\ iiii. : ::....:i::ii:i:i:•• ., '.'..',):';';'...(:i;,.::'`'':`'...'''A. ". ` ' ..• ..„,
LI. leig , .•":•.•:::*i:i:i:::::::i:..:2. " '
%....,.•...0.... A„1'm''14A41 M5.0 m.,...m.m1s0 1 M1 E...M"•.A,.•L I:O.LP,,, 'MII NA Oi M2 AIM III II IMI MMM:M:II:iIl:.
c-
,,.. --- -..- --._L•i• T•iMu -- -_ ---C . IINIVIIMIINMMIIN
!•.•• 11 •AMMEVIIMMINI _ __ ':
o0c0,0 ::; ;:•.t _ - :.:7•.•::•i,:::::,.:,.:.::,::::.,:-:7:.:,.,..7,4.-
•
011,
.0 ......... ...:..,
.....t. .000 li::::::::::::::..,s•,..It.1 .••• Ilium g i c.,__-__- _____%DA?=____i,..„,,.,.
MINE1111111
rr a . . . inisteems Nem la a, . a-- 1,no,:pcpc, ---_- t'',.)•L'- CA-2, . :::::::.::i:i:i::::::
I . , i MM... •••• • • -L..--_1__..-------‘-'0 0 c,
..-'1""I' ME ..,, __ a :
••.. —— ————--————— a ,, ••••• ••• ••• • •
/k -- • 1:::: IiIIII II
ii
IIMIMMIII' 'mom nil I,.• --_ -t_--_-_-_-_- g,..e.r....
::"•'.i n ci-n n n n ...,• )
- —IT -Rasa, :,... .,uarrommout a' C - -.• ••-.7.• .
--.-- -- -- -- • ...•r ni......, - ,,•,,,,. 000..ff-••• •„••••••r..;,.. - -- •• :::i..:.•0000000 .:,,0
.•:::::: 000000c, .' I (
SIM R. • e ,III
00000,..,::-rf,c,,• •:•:•.••0000000 : .).\...\
I Iliril ' - , 00000..C.:•...(4: ,:.,. o
oc00000c
000000c-
rol.'-rifPZ
oo,,,,,,,, 1 z''.•,(9
,L-'- -MP-Z-NICT:= :,:
-4140--,------
,. . ;`•74. ,,`..! ..,-_____________ • .e... \I -7.; 000000c.
000000
000000c }'
.-, nnnoonom
•11 fl , . J?
.,111111111111
c••,_ 1
i '4?-•.:e ,.
o..-'-,,,,,.:soiniimmmillit'lf.)...q,/?••.-.•:•')....:?=. -::,--L--=-=--_-_-_-.i--.:-=.--7. -.::-_-_ •,-e,,,
:<•,:,... ,..„.---7---- ' `-' .
• . . 1. :.'''''',--,'o--tZi"z•-;------------I---C----- ' t,, I •fi,
„cr-',;r:_,..,•0.3,,,,:,i•'eei..•.<1:,'-r.i.:",::G-':r•:'•-,'-•'''-`,:',2:-`-'-'•;,- re:,
,, II: '.1E.:,i.ii":.,:','X'...1•1'32 L•_s_'' .2-_,•••:.:'::_1,`F•,.... •./i:•:\______________ .V. J•
' • i-. :::-...:•11-
• e :...••-, --T-,,,___,,A-.... ,,yi 3:...\- ..e:?/, -.-'-•-•- -•-•-• •' -.1
C'Lt;
• • • !,:7.3.;,--.;•:.---------IF-—--- ------------4---- I
_ • • • 7:::' •-,
• • :-.-
- ••'•:.:::::_.;..,:-.1., ...
LAND USE ELEMENT ...,,,,
000
..,,... .::..:1:.,:::::i:i:ii:: :-.-allik.:.:
3,..6.' siri .:.:•:....:::::......::::.........,..
:, .:.........:...:::::::::::ix..IMIIIIIIIYMI,•••••. .7, . ••7
...:::.::..:•:•......:..:.::•:•:•.1•••••••••iik.::.
::P:r...P.:rgli „..., ::.::.:.:.•.::::ai:i::::a:11111111111111111:::.
Single Family mom.. Commercial •0.00•0-.00000.0• .••••, - • ,
00.00 ., :-..,,,..,:,•,.:-..:,•. 4.1 ..:.:.:. ' ‘81111/11•11M1r.•:.•
'A "IINIMEr••••'.•
•• •••• -.•'[. •:•:•:•: IP
00000000• •.' • - •••
.o0o0o0o.o.o0o.:.• .•.. ......; ::• ..„
.•.:.:•:•:.:•:•:.:.:•.! i ,l'•, 0000000.
•000000•• ••••,' -:-.. . '4A•,
:::::::•:•:•:':::::::: Low Density 00.000 • • tlr, •...., ,,.9 ,
Office / Office Park .0000.00000.,... ...........::::
,0•••• ::•0000 :•:.:•:•.•:•:•:. •••••••• •Cr.
.....................
;.\\ ..0000.000000, •:•:•:•:,:•:.:•: r.'.)4,..:5,. --, N--
00000.00000• •:•:•: •:•:: •••••• i
•0000•000000 ••:•:•:.•:•:•:•. .5...„7„.,
00000.00000• :::::::::::::: :,..., -•,....
00000•0000• ...:., ••:•;i::::' ,,.?,-••,,',.','?/:
Medium. Density 00.0000.000000
0000000 .0000000.00.0 ,..._ -,••••,, .2.•-).-;4c,:,
...............
.00.000 Public/Quasi-Public w3)
•••••••••••.-
.............„ Multi-Family .00.000
00.000o ..,,,,,- •
..............
,,..,
•.•...•••
.r.., .` .MWM High Density .. i --1
$0:::::::•:::::::•,:k.::.:
•>:.:„.:•:.:::,::•::::::.:::;::.:: Light ,i,
:••,::::,•,...,•,...,•• Multmil .
Lht Industrial y • f
Mbin. :*•2 e•
. •
e ....••...' .....,<:-....1,1,..ty., .II • • \
.. .
Xe.,VCCF.A.I. Recreation • • •• .,•.-..,.
• • • Heavy Industrial •,.;!if,
..cl... .,.,,,tssk..
• • • .
,.
Greenbelt
,...i.s. r:
,.-E,•,; ,'.1...,,•• ._-_-_-_-_-
.-_-_--_- Manufacturing Park • --,!--.-‘-. .
\ -';-.:••
i.
•1 s. . .
•
CITY OF RENTON
• DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-112-89
APPLICATION NO (S) : SA-112-89
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME
PROJECT NAME: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex,
including two structures, parking and
service areas, landscaping and recreational
amenities . There is a wetland on the site
-- . 99 acre portion is proposed to be
filled and the remainder will be enhanced
with native vegetation. The 16 acre
project site is vacant and is zoned for
manufacturing park use.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 601 Monster Road
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Community Development Department
Current Planning Division
The Environmental Review Committee, on April 11, 1990 , reviewed the revised
application for the above referenced project. Based upon their review of
the submitted comments and staff input, the Committee reaffirmed their
decision to issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated. As a
result of their review, the Committee did retain Conditions #1 through #8
of the Deteziuination and added four new conditions . The additional
conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review
Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code
(see attached sheet) . Existing and added conditions are necessary to
mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review
process .
This Determination is final and may be appealed to the City' s Hearing
Examiner no later than 5 : 00 p.m. on April 30, 1990 . Any appeal of this
decision must state clearly in writing why the Determination should be
revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75 . 00 filing fee.
Responsible Official : Environmental Review Committee
c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
Current Planning Division
Community Development Department
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
PUBLICATION DATE: April 16 1990
DATE OF DECISION: April 11, 1990
SIGNATURES :
Kenneth E . ZLy rPcf n .
Communit 6evelopment Department
Lynn . Guttmann, Director
PublVc Works Department
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
MITIGATION MEASURES
PROJECT: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-112-89
APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-112-89
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex,
including two structures, parking and
service areas, landscaping and recreational
amenities . There is a wetland on the site
-- . 99 acre portion is proposed to be
filled and the remainder will be enhanced
with native vegetation. The 16 acre
project site is vacant and is zoned for
manufacturing park use.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 601 Monster
Road.
RECOMMENDATIONS : On April 11, 1990 , the Environmental Review
Committee issued a Revised Determination of
Non-Significance-Mitigated to include each
of the eight (8) conditions attached, plus
four (4) new conditions as follows :
9) That the applicant provide $4 , 000 . 00 as
a fair share payment toward the Washington
State Department of Transportation project
for the signalization of the (SR 900)
Martin Luther King Way/68th Avenue South
intersection, subject to the approval of
the City of Renton Public Works Department
and the King County Public Works
Department. .
10) That the applicant provide in-kind
replacement (and enhancement) of wetlands
to compensate for the . 99 acre of emergent
wetland which is to be filled.
Replaced/enhanced wetland shall be between
. 55 acre and . 99 acre and is to be
connected to existing wetland areas located
on the northwest portion of now-defined
Parcel #4 . Wetland replacement/enhancement
plans are subject to approval by the City's
Landscape Planner and concurrence of the
State Department of Wildlife;
replacement/enhancement shall be achieved
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
11) That the applicant allow an annual
inspection by the City of each and all of
the wetlands areas on now-defined Parcel #2
and now defined Parcel #4 of the subject
property, to ensure that these areas are
being properly protected and maintained,
with inspection rights to be provided
through an easement to allow access to the
site and a covenant to ensure that the
easement runs with the land, to be valid
for the life of the project. These
documents are to be approved by the City
Attorney and provided prior to the public
hearing for site plan approval .
12) That the applicant, prior to public
hearing for site plan approval , in order to
ensure protection of the effluent transfer
system, obtain from METRO approval of
construction plans and provide an easement
and covenant to run with the land for METRO
access to maintain and repair the sewer
line, subject to approval by METRO and the
Renton City Attorney.
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
MITIGATION MEASURES
•
PROJECT: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-112-89
APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-112-89
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a
warehouse/office complex, including two structures,
parking and service areas, landscaping and recreational
amenities. There is a wetland on the site -- .99 acre
portion is proposed to be filled and the remainder will
• be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre
project site is vacant and is zoned for manufacturing
park use.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 601 Monster Road.
RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a
Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with
the following conditions:
Natural Environment: 1) That the applicant provide a revised wetland
landscaping plan, to include a greater number, size and
diversity of native wetland plants, subject to approval
by the City, by the Department of Ecology and by the
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in advance of site plan
review.
Earth: 2) That the applicant provide a statement agreeing to
limit filling operations on the site to a maximum of .99
acres of.the wetland and an approved amount of
dryland fill, using fill material approved by the City, as
well as fill methods/monitoring systems approved by the
City and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in advance
of the issuance of site preparation/building permits.
(Note: The wetland fill plan has been approved by the
Department of Ecology).
Traffic: 3) That the applicant directly provide regional traffic
improvements as stipulated by the-Transportation
Systems Division or make a voluntary contribution to
the Grady Way TBZ in the amount of $254,345.65
• ($185.00 per trip).
Note: The applicant will also need to provide an off-
site improvements plan, including streetlighting, curbs,
sidewalks, gutters and undergro•unding of utility lines,
subject to the approval of the Public Works Department.
(See "Note #B below)
Traffic: 4) That the applicant provide a TMP, including
carpooling/vanpooling, preferred parking, pedestrian
linkages to adjacent Oakesdale Avenue, subject to the
approval of METRO and the Transportation Systems
Division.
Traffic: 5) That the applicant provide an ingress/egress plan
(e.g. driveway location, dimensions and design) as
required by "Access Management to Streets and
• Highways" or "ITE Transportation and Land
Development Standards" or as recommended by a
licensed transportation engineer in order to ensure safe,
efficient access for large trucks hauling products from
the site to the adjacent heavily-traveled Oakesdale
Avenue.
(Note #1: All traffic mitigation plans [Conditions #3
through #5, inclusive] must be approved and fees (if
established) paid in advance of the issuance of site
- preparation/building permits for the development.)
(Note #2: The development will generate additional
• traffic [estimated at 83 trips per day] to the nearby
intersection of Martin Luther King Way and 68th
Street, where level of service "E" already exists.
Because this intersection is under the jurisdiction of
King County, the City will notify County officials.
The applicant may be called upon by the County to
• participate in signal warrants at that intersection; the
applicant has been so advised.)
(Note #3: The Washington State Department of
Transportation may call for additional mitigation
measures if more than 10 trips occur on any state
highway during p.m. peak hours during construction or
operations).
•
Storm Water: 6) That the applicant:
a) provide a revised site plan which elevates all
structures a minimum of two (2) feet above the defined
floodplain elevation of nineteen (19) feet; OR, b)
provide secondary containment for all structures to
minimize leakage of damaged products (e.g. from fire or
flood) to protect the underlying terrain against
contamination, over the life of the 'project; OR c)
provide a "hold harmless" agreement ensuring that the
municipality will not be responsible for any damage
occurring to the site or developments thereupon
resulting from flooding on the property. Plans and/or
agreements shall be subject to the approval of the Fire
Prevention Bureau and the Public Works Department
(agreements shall also be approved by the City
Attorney), and shall be provided in advance of the
issuance of site preparation/building permits.
Storm Water: 7) That the applicant shall provide a storm water
drainage management plan, in advance of the issuance
of site preparation/building permits, subject to approval
of the Public Works Department, including: a) on-site
detention with 100 year/7 day design (with design
specifications provided in a supplementary soils
engineering report) (*); b) Type II catch basins with
baffled oil/water separators; and c) biofiltration swales
for storm water prior to entrance into the wetlands (fire
lanes adjacent to wetlands will require adequate
biofiltering buffer strips).
(*) There is an approved Soils Engineering Report on
file, but because staff is recommending a 100 year/7
day design system, rather than the customarily required
25 year/2 day design system, owing to site
characteristics -- e.g. elevations, wetlands -- the Report
will need to be modified with respect to design
specifications prior to the issuance of building permits.
Construction/Noise
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
• MITIGATION MEASURES
PROJECT: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
•
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-112-89
APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-112-89
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a
warehouse/office complex, including two structures,
parking and service areas, landscaping and recreational
amenities. There is a wetland on the site -- .99 acre
portion is proposed to be filled and the remainder will
be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre
project site is vacant and is zoned for manufacturing
park use.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 601 Monster Road. •
RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a
Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with
the following conditions:
Natural Environment: • 1) That the applicant provide a revised wetland
landscaping plan, to include a greater number; size and
diversity of native wetland plants, subject to approval
by the City, by the Department of Ecology and by the
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in advance of site plan
review.
Earth: 2) That the applicant provide a statement agreeing to
limit filling operations on the site to a maximum of .99
acres of the wetland and an.approved amount of
dryland fill, using fill material approved by the City, as
well as fill methods/monitoring systems approved by the
City and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in advance
of the issuance of site preparation/building permits.
(Note: The wetland fill plan has been approved by the
Department of Ecology).
Traffic: 3) That the applicant directly provide regional traffic
improvements as stipulated by the Transportation
Systems Division or make a voluntary contribution to
the Grady Way TBZ in the amount of S254,345.65
• (S 185.00 per trip).
Note: The applicant will also need to provide an off-
site improvements plan, including ,streetlighting, curbs,
sidewalks., gutters and undergrounding of utility lines,
subject to the approval of the Public Works Department.
(See "Note #B below)
Traffic: 4) That the applicant provide a TMP, including
carpooling/vanpooling, preferred parking, pedestrian
linkages to adjacent Oakesdale Avenue, subject to the
approval of METRO and the Transportation Systems
• Division.
Traffic: 5) That the applicant provide an ingress/egress plan
(e.g. driveway location, dimensions and design) as
required by "Access Management to Streets and
Highways" or "ITE Transportation and Land
Development Standards" or as recommended by a
licensed transportation engineer in order to ensure safe,
efficient access for large trucks hauling products from
the site to the adjacent heavily-traveled Oakesdale
Avenue.
(Note #1: All traffic mitigation plans [Conditions #3
through #5, inclusive] must be approved and fees (if
established) paid in advance of the issuance of site
preparation/building permits for the development.)
•
(Note #2: The development will generate additional
traffic [estimated at 83 trips per day] to the nearby
•
intersection of Martin Luther King Way and 68th
Street, where level of service "E" already exists.
Because this intersection is under the jurisdiction of
King County, the City will notify County officials.
The applicant may be called upon by the County to
participate in signal warrants at that intersection; the
applicant has been so advised.)
(Note #3: The Washington State Department of
Transportation may call for additional mitigation
measures if more than 10 trips occur on any state
• highway during p.m. peak hours during construction or
operations).
Storm Water: 6) That the applicant:
a) provide a revised site plan which elevates all
structures a minimum of two (2) feet above the defined
floodplain elevation of nineteen (19) feet; OR, b)
provide secondary containment for all structures to
minimize leakage of damaged products (e.g. from fire or
flood) to protect the underlying terrain against
contamination, over the life of the project; OR c)
provide a "hold harmless" agreement ensuring that the .
municipality will not be responsible for any damage
occurring to the site or developments thereupon
resulting from flooding on the property. Plans and/or
agreements shall be subject to the approval of the Fire-
Prevention Bureau and the Public Works Department
(agreements shall also be approved by the City
Attorney), and shall be provided in advance of the
issuance of site preparation/building permits.
Storm Water: 7) That the applicant shall provide a storm water
drainage management plan, in advance of the issuance
of site preparation/building permits, subject to approval
of the Public Works Department, including: a) on-site
detention with 100 year/7 day design (with design
specifications provided in a supplementary soils
engineering report) (*); b) Type II catch basins with
baffled oil/water separators; and c) .biofiltration swales
for storm water prior to entrance into the wetlands (fire
lanes adjacent to wetlands will require adequate
biofiltering buffer strips).
(*) There is an approved Soils Engineering Report on
file, but because staff is recommending a 100 year/7 •
day design system, rather than the customarily required
25 year/2 day design system, owing to site
characteristics -- e.g. elevations, wetlands -- the Report
will need to be modified with respect to design
specifications prior to the issuance of building permits.
Construction/Noise
Light/Glare/Traffic 8) That the applicant provide a construction mitigation
plan including the following components: a) an erosion
control plan; b) a plan for protection of the wetland
area to be retained while the area to be eliminated is
being filled; c) a plan for wheel-washing of all
construction vehicles prior to leaving the site; d) water
down the site periodically to control dust and debris; e)
a plan for restriction of hauling routes and hours of
hauling operations; f) a plan for signage of site and
structures during construction to facilitate emergency
service provision; and, g) a $5,000.00 cash bond for
street clean-up.
In addition the City requests:
.Recreation: 1) That the applicant make a voluntary contribution in
• the amount of $5,000.00 to the development of the
Master Trails Plan in the area of the site.
2) That the applicant provide a recorded easement to
establish a connection from the site to the proposed
adjacent Master Trail., for use by project employees,
subject to approval by the Landscape Planner and the
Parks and Recreation Department.
Note #A: Modifications to the site plan (architectural design), the exterior illumination plan, on-site
recreation plan and dryland landscaping plan (increased plantings; thematic integrity) and landscaping
maintenance bond will be required in conjunction with site plan review.
Note #B: Specific plans/specifications for on-site and off-site improvements, in compliance with
Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, Public Works Standards (Storm Water, Traffic, Water Flow and Fire
Flow) and related regulations, will be required at the time of site preparation/building permit
application.
•
mmdoc
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
O'.It''M11
ETYP^Y 6MLL yl , / LEGEND __ 'v��) cI)ll•� i' •
_ ' ' ''1� �.� __ � �� .� I ` PRDPDSEO WILX NCt LINE �JlJ!i 1 yyy�IilliI 'I.t,\•_,A"'S�TE- g
I 1�t yaf �,.��{ II •
1.7 ° \\ EXIST.CONTOUR - /6�_i .t1`}� ����) ✓ M �[v c�
A11 c 1.o- .'1++� D" .•.V i:/ \ / rROPO5G0 coNTOUR �— ,,N. 1 !.� lt...r.... I Z 3
C '� bV f•� • �‘ /I ryND /''r �/ \ ;/ç:9
•t / O •/ \ a AI�L7 ` Mew LINE e[EVA-ION tj !\\- '��JT- f =N
r•1 ;1„a; _ � w-H •� _;..( °r� \\`�� ROCK _r _ ':.Jt\o:X� co,-!!!I' Uz
id r — \ /-Z°1--Y_ • ��I \4 �4H `S1, I `y \\ \ Z Oyro� c P~ DIVER310NDITCH --- :t4' • (� k; 1�� i. :i: • ~5
�� PRO O 1AUILDINC•B" ��// p * ` SILT PENCE VIGIIJI'TY Fl P =N Rop
1' I i \V+ 4. l� . . \ \r.L f.l000' 0.�¢ K/ \\ \ 2:1 store(UNLESS OTHERWISE WTGO
r it
; l I J I � (S .,scg, - \\ ` ).1.LL III
I ` 1 \ T 1 �/p\ (SCE ARCH/TEES RFINPORLEO PILL I I W
\ PLANS f'Qo OWIp yl
I ` I _\4_ _ �a\ t` • I.,,\pMernONs) „„..et \ \ [• EXIST.RAILROAD TRACTS I I • 0 Z 'v
Ily � .''1 '' ,, I , �_"__ !� ai• II POND+n =O
� , '4 '�"III `-v .)'I. I O\\ I /^, ! Y �,[ See pETaL SHT.e U)
` • chi:6
‘/..„--,..____-______....,10,
\\ '� t So Le-6[
10 0 \ . , ,...:;" :
. ,
. -,,
....,1 ,
1 \ ,_____..
I Sr.•� y' `� I �,, . AIL' FEINRORCEO RU_, NOTE: / Z't.__ 1 6
LOCATION: SITE Iftv[[.Or[oMAIM[CORPORATION - •+_ „_......_
o/;-'11 , \ I'/. ',.t'.': I• FOIL 02(AIL$PE rp �U{Y�[AITIED NOx i[E oao Swim2ST <9II fl . I I Z �O.•, 1 5HT.4 .\ ITII IN LS1 T 5 of C PET.) iiiip
r I [OMa S AMIE.. . A.wN iM SUITE IT[I.
// SE TTTE• ♦...T.9EImI r
;1
'11
\I AA•
G I of D` I • `I /�AOtTb F 1 , •
/ Iff
/I PL.r[EIa[[I[r r[o.I[[T TUN<ceE-ROUT M.IOTA 1 II
di
`�� :./I f Y��I \ I '�I`II\-lYd�M^•ItI�,-_,_ r .., W we_-I'I_..-•.—,o s 0 4!,
1 �� 1st`: I� ptOP�S�EQ '•K / / / ��
bP� TIy�I g(�`f�LIIJfNC7 .dam •\ �S .� ,
"� ,I'N ; SURE HA Te ELEV. '`p_. "l .�'O •,J / ? 6. Nor.-IzoIN I_17...n,rl ±6
I.i�• I S� '` °(see n2np�cr(eAxr 9 �_— e:r— '.��'•'-`iC\��-.�.,,�,a � Y'yr ,�b a�...eI..,66 s.a�e..�.r�u..-.N. oP `
I ':t`.,�a':6 °� • roReu allo pNENSroNs)A� �.•,:: .� -. ,�✓�,Qy o o+s.J. oOGa.../to 4.�....0.,s_(..... e. N
1 v y , s' ,,•t¢i�\ 1 I m ��\'''.. f \�v '' ev..�...A.,er..,�a -o aE�LbEa _4
o nc I rl nc.[I O.� 9oLP-6` I/ / n
\\ `% I POND�I � R 6.
�N>< \/t:yrlG,..I_ �.-.n1PnA..ill"..I Is\
\ �\ • •
"ral'�—_� / . b `O a w-ni.•I c'�.-ESP,O b DIeBc� �- ¢O
\ `\ }• I ./L 6P EO�` cOo U46c{G
'' `I y 4/�\ / \KKRCHECKIwn IN� S^ _�' so
••,,A...) I-w.s u.IE ..•� :a P. U Z x
IC `1`^ \ / \ A1zE�-o.6ae.�-I 64 Fr.Oa. 1,0057.+GEES <L
-Yk� .I ` ''' } � � iSf SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FARTHWOF.Y 0_ In m
11 so \\ \ I \ //[ LMMA.'LIMITS OF CI-I411Kl. SUOGRAOe GI.re:oE- uI A 6'.rxf o I— '
\ \ / i.J�/ ry/. / v.�.� YINSTM-L SILT FENCES. t_I^-LO,000 G.v W CO
P \ '\a�' \ / %S- t/Y ¢� I GU1L.16-,4 eUlf6cs-oEl w
T !IOU �I L.o s�a9 31NSTgLL RMNRARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION Flu.--Vc,.10 G.Y. 0b1,100 cY BWb:A, I6,210 4Y.5LfXo.`e;) [Y Q 'U
•
\ �' \ 'TS•T 5,.-o. EMRANC E. J
\�I .. 1`//V , %� 4Co•KM,X.T OPP-0Re ORAIw•CC rnv[RSI ON eUILOI.,b Ouoc-,aeGc: a ~ N o'm
— [ f .4I 11 4: �T_•_ A„,„,...,„� NyO DITCHES PAL.--4.,330 c...(.3'i OSo 4T:6LDfa:'C,.1.SOO cY.eA-P.fe ) W �_'w F
Z re
\\ '-p r'�= W /- •' '� SCONSiRLCT SIOIMGNT POHOS W�PERtbRiTeD Qul-u-(Hlec Esc.GI Sluefi�'S Ea•flvwe FOR ¢ a''U LL
� 4 •
J,� aV• fUSeR OUTL[-I�.CLOD DIve gli DITCH es. pJEonrT ouL:r. s?I✓u.rE 4u-t 0 s.^re ¢ O¢
•.�I• .y ••.���/. i NT BC Usco FOIi'_OloOlu I+it.c•rb U
�y SPILL ANO GRADE SITE To SUSGRAOG EL.YATIpN.
�t'O \` ��yD�' �y // / I R.JIw a.nrol.4.PS J f9F Ean<T T.::,7T0.L. R6GEa TeI N
7 SEED OISTUROEO AREAS. i
RTKION 01 nor 1 ¢,/.,, �D - ..
. . ROUTES/Pro W.Or TRUCE ^` ��/ f �I'-SON 3-2f7o
. ELITON POa APPROVAL PRIOR m C NCI.VOLE.m I"-50i 4II• it•. a<
�f�ja 09 Z46.03
n4-81 I . z
•
Ord/11'0 ai.0 0Yi P/e.r H
- I u sls� .e,�l= • r, ,....'11— Typ.oil aid.," / UZ
w
J JJ DIVEF stow DITGl1 a.�...ua ... w ¢ <� cn Zonu �m. . .
i» L.G•ai �.I'r..4.0/2 /I' N.. /E.•I I.00 ,F^.'. ilt w�...:�.v.wv .. ... . =
L't1 • 7
%I1/H''Eray./ ® T e I I r r , ♦ c r I 1 ."n .,.. .n........n... O
L. n .......-- .-Q _
M ■ S I. T s: `.M —,
• I. 'A
TEMPORARY DETENTION POND DETAIL ''"�' r~ d,w��.� oZ
1,cwLL Gr o ,...� Q z 7
CO 2
.,m....w. n.'.".,:,".;;;gin.':,.17.:':.:.711I
Glx
50
n. W
rZ8 GX, _
fLXOSCD MCfC f ` 28 -
p
Z jcVBU/GpN.yA" Or OU/GO/N4 A' � L
2.4 —___—__._—____ ____._.____- _—'� 24
J \"
/
zo — — --- -- — zo • , : 3 d
16 L____ - OF'06eD bU 2cH.�-¢Ge. _-__—_-.____-_ __/' __. _ 1 t3 , I
ESUILDIuc '.b: c j 1
4 y -- -- — — - 14
Iz Iz
a L 4
,a 1
-
10 (la-ve 4- 10 20 10-144
GG-
rlou 'A-� ' 12=J4' llb .1.. ID 9-I4'
nsdvuLLci- W
of
_'-_ _ ___ 0.0, ...) ZZ
Gal.cent�R� _- U I- O
30 3 0 as't MA.. -,rt-. L2.. ~ e
J N�
ZS
ZG —.___..__—._._.__. .. .. _. __—___—.—_ _. __. __.___________ -- —2G _ L2 Z U
m
orroacv -¶ ITcETtT
--Za '- ,_11-_ ,V 'WE...u..) Q
ig
ZO ' ' •_ - - w La- — I b (r+..,-run.+,.,..w o,... .) o 0r' o mI� RE I.JFORLED F I LL DETAIL Y K
_ h E LT 1 o.J C-G a.r.4.w
G,b. eGb.
j 5'
/O-449 ,. Z . z
al
•
I
' — -'
F._ - — -- --- - -- —
—f. . 116
L
It
. _--. —� -
0
a
_ - O
_i_ _1_
• ` I
:g
T T.
I
— - o
1 _ o
o O—_ O.-_ o o
BLDG. E7 FLoOp-.. PLAN I.,,,,.
I ll DISTKIbLl.iION FAGILIIY FOS.
D i nce associamuetesar f�RUGE FLUME CO. d"•-„
" arcs itects aia �...w ad
IN RENTON wns NinGTON .
oa uw.ae.. a.cc•coo ace ceeo
_ d.s.
•
•
•
tvzItI
_..�., - T::EIP11 `i. 1f
•
_ _ zinc I' o t �':a
3 :-17 w
-x n v , ea. . 26 �VaJ -
., N.,...."..'•=.7nr7:....7.:rN...:•..n..'..a...,_.,..,..,-., arm •o i .m
01
-•C .;2 ii*,
'r a,laaldlv,o/:,.d./ab
fD , c•9Nm w_ • .p �jy�J
t J01 L a, ._,....,.,,,_�_,._.,,.�.,.,. ., ,,...:,�.... '..,_Z o.s•.r.��a 1.r•wo-.WV;U -, _ i lM}\,Q. II,
nt^•➢{ ..,._..,..._.„_.,_,_, .,. . ace k-,.t..,, �tL1 / : 17 I� .
CR V,, .., , a...•r !, .._»...._».._ ..._.nu........ ,N.,+.......,"_,.._,...-',n aJ•T.'Mr a/,•d� 1— ��
am
°u m /
„�Y 'ba `/�y IiNiy •
O�O� `4ba d j /
w .,...,e......v.. .... r T • �i'1 / iR,� ' i l. -Of ,., . v..,V.v. ., e,a..v. I u„V, •,v..e.,. ,w J p /tn{T V , ,w.. • VVa CJ i^SS
Li 7R ne � �/ .:.Xj' ' i `I , —_ •_ . :I
91 111 1 /// l' 'j 1;
`1J �,, ',..i .v., / i�/ ' 11- - \`�—f'.-,.1 1., �.ig1jaw Iy.ii i` I (. , -I e I I I -
'v....aw. ra1.r m // `•l V. l- --_-�: \`\ .. -_ .c Ill
•
[[a,v , ,[-,—,,a...v.a v, ....•�- .—,,V,,.. ' / - I J •—" .7', I • ````\ I i-I-S''. , 3I U
_.".._—N 0,1.{'I>J�'ed6^,.a=e,w,9a/1. /: ;a !4� `\\``\`v .. il., Y aim.. 1.I t-.
r :.0 1 ,� ,_-�,r-- .w ,,;, ,,, I
....------.---\ , \ ' '.I. ,•, ' .,._... ' \‘'H'II' '''--.---7'11'.-71'-.1.''1. ' II i..>:
g.
, • 18/r , 1- ,..'„,.,.. t ': -.' •
- .,...;\ :: 1.
•
•
L. 2 Fin -9h„o•,.ro 9`,.151%=—/, �._.i5 � �_A e
Et•
mn Z •
i N i + a..1•.",�1 \ resai., Ayo w:.�y dL+O'' P (< ..
a 1,nhJ „as_M1.ai. _,.,noeo�,,,,I I- :ter CC E la
/ . .
1\l':\': j
' -,,
•
•
.-11-Yft,ti .
—a lEY
'''
.)i• \-• '€.-2‘ s_. ,--,-
11 -I\v"!_I__. \.1,,,! . ;;•.-;;Oa 1.1.-;51;,i;i1 '...F3i.:
I
,
k m _ 1----I----
°3 t — 1..7.;::,:.,,t.;=,,:c!1 - ,.......A-,...- '-';''"1:4:7-....ntr.-:....4...". .''.‘-''''''''' • •
: n•C V; ' . .7--r :.‘;-•"'; • I I 1 I I ! -1 I I I I, ! l'.-i'Pd;; ...-... • ' ; •'• -r-----^.--i 1. ; I.•• .;:;711 I 41 !
: co 01 0 • :--.. : ' I. ...L.,,,,I al. ' , i * ',-.1.1..1. _
.1 •."
.•,
• •
I I, • 1 - • 1 ' 1 .•;41—4"'4r°14 'I 1 . _
f • ;t
co m
.'
I I if,::— i • .:
' .
• i.
, , , , : ,
II. ; I 1.111;. '"rr.!-"•-' —.. _ _L_ .r_lk_j,' __ 4_1 ,---,;.tv-r4:41 .] ,K, 1 1 1 i•i . ,
"3 , , . , L,LL___ _\.,,,,,,,=r4.__,I.ji,_ . _L.:. I ir i-T ._ ; I.:--1-- 1--1 •-7:7-ri--7 - i--1--.- i 7.7
•. .. ..
.0 '6" 7?; 7•5' • 55 C-(3 igi ''."1 Cs 4', ,,,; .t5' g a, t5 4 . . 6 t 15 ..g 6 6 ' 6, L._ , I I ,•
r ,
- i
.: _li — -•13. 1 .- 1.•..;.,.......rimpz'-{
,.:, I ---;
1 2 I i---: " i. 2 -'
7 - - -
_ ._,___I--; • "`3
•...,„<3;t-t";1 11 ,. t. ,• T.-To,....?v.., ._ ---,
• ------.11:1.
— ". t.To-i-r.s,.;•I., 1 ,c 1 , 1
-15
-1 - •-7-(DO
.
7 -r i 11 i 1
1 1 .
. . '
O• 7---k •
..:-../.„-tV..-/
c - •
z Z r_, •
1---.] --
..-.
,.....41
' < .. •
I c.
> --;\ t.v;o1Y -.44 4- 711-...: I
r 0,7) • ,.,.....b.,,o,L.1,-L
M 1- .. _ r.t.d...1,J•ly-33. ,..2;.2_, __; _ _ I _
-.• .
,;-r...s...d.JAL
-3.33 r,,Z.P. - .
;.
I . •41:;T;-.";44.±Z,—4 N
. '
1
• r- E.:: • .4.':'-'il.;'.-33.7-:)..1Z i I 1_-_-_-_: 1-_-_.: I
(\ I
-) v--3-7.,-r`t•:-3-..o.
..,..1,`30,-,
....r,°”V71•i4,1N
I ',1 •
- -, • .
.
-,i, -r- ••s.,
i • >
- — i 0.4:•::.!....re: ;F:i,‘"; ....
..../.,,,
_ _ __ _ __ . _ ..,---1_ _ - - -. [
r -----0
• 1.,..,
'----` 7-1
I I
I .
.
- 1---I I •.--O .
: I
I t
..-• 1--1 11::::.: Ell i-_-_] . L__.1,
• 1
. I • .
. 1 .
.•,,,. .
oi
I __ L R :
6. L.
..,,I, '•®
, ,..,. a
., .
•--, 'Fj .
)-.4 .•El , c-a i•9-•se ov -61.j 4';4459 . .•`'i. 1 Y. I . .
: .
-a°g. • - I . . • .
I .
S .
1 21 : . -t —•- ,, _ . .
(...5 _
.e-f" ..19s
0 4111 jp. (f_3;) 0
f i
1
4— •-•...,-...61,S;;) „..-.•X .
V
73
H1v,N
• DIr
mnm •
E i
in CO 0
'
u iO - - ool ��1 Ci II ..I lip I ,:I'b/
NId1�l0�1JCa
v L t -
i
•--, I -ems,�1-;,./
Ii —
uC .o `i •
µI 1I J•+nx>ww+o
�yJMJrJ-02J I. T�aM.•4. ti - I 'm
,
•
L r Ire .. I
▪>
-,O I I P.T+.9+Y hM
I. %sary,iw•ie •o
3DL...„,_(.. „, i I r
0 :w -� -
i
•
O ( ° •Erg NId1-to- 1:d`d�Jd O .
r
0 I — H,A t y,_ r — ;A.,
1 .1.i -aG+�c..Uw. \
-s lrbd u
���� s x y oy�av,•,ivw pw1J—
I ...,...nd c;../rv..1.-- <- \
% v
,J :__j :__. j F__-
0
_ Nlvlyn", J-d O
®0 1 ='tip..,., I e-; _ I > i . j
aNe a 0, 1 o
=▪ +IY wdrwtiw..v, a
o 1. • I I z 0 _ ___
s I •• © w__. ._-. I __ I •
a
i rjc5 : . .n I .
S•� ; j
(1) —1 _ -- —1 — — —I 1 1 .o_fit ;_� —_-_ --- I 1
r (I�
•
•
•
a� �a I < ,y,a� I s�sl v., S.J-�fy 19�7 WQ0?1 H'7 r4(r1
F (3,t4.49..i.4.V../3=i II"MI : 1
11
11 PE
! a .< 6:'.'.?grLj'�vr�mp r , 6 1 I0ARI1I- 111,14 L---' tM,..,=P;:‘` :Vs
mm N,d-ld .Jce7-, 1S�Ida _ 1I { ,XLM::;':V1 -
1 o m 4. �t P.tt m r
4.
•
J vg:Noilv/9l�w� l9 Ib1 r' o �' „ , "" G k o_ ,z
u / �^J
i
Y 7.1 tl^N,••,1rd ' O b �� L�JLJ 1
u -rmsNl yi rr.>• 7N• d ILLS ), •aeJ.nJ ;� 3.n
>i..x wl rye 11 �\ �''' I _
m 'r G_• -I __ -j•1 4.f— i -H.I ©T. --f `•-, rgEl Mlw-BI le
® .
Y m f F .'� © L ^ _nn
_l- \JIB-'II P ^�I Gf'+11V$
M.nnv tyy■ o+ ,'s1- ©o I `�II •7`l� C�'7- ♦•..s --\ < I�J
•
< trio•) -- I • ©�, �� �—p O --4>-- ®{� •I I ofY✓rldJo WI Fill ff 5,21 i
»u� ,..,, ©fLi__ ® 4' _v ,�„ Cd r n__ We 11S J I O W ED
}L—.—_—6 i��dao m 1� —' 'I„ rY ,��— ?/o:.r..p.'s�.,? C• .a:o } .a:4
Z S-f I o1:=0 ?— ^ - �=f _ —
l1 !�T 0 ;u a,:x•,! 4��.—L ;1 u,® _ ADO" r"�„.,o�1 ii '.
r_ Tyr «H • y O o: --•
I �'-
6 6
l��> vs�� ®ill V 9 Ii © }' 3)L laoo o o a ••1
T c L 3-J.,d, a7r II 9 l�J m i -,,,,-..sue �+ur.no»v . i .
ti.
S C- .. i ...w.k;1,,UJ as ...I
n ' 1 -2191 ,-n>1 I I
T
1-61 v✓ i ' (~ol �l
.--S •
{If�—r{�t ry ivy
1 SS '!Nr'M�-s
16.
t i _ 740 •-irlry
do we ©©
Ygt.•41'I"1 I.,I 9-4 j.
I r.gclgt .4.—.1 .,(.7 :ii_Iv ,..r,„..., r9 .__ ,I. :\.4 ,1(T.),._._,,.:, ,,,•:,...
_ ©'_ ,9~..• .,,,,„_� _--_t _ [ _—I ,p C�Z 1,..- ,.a . __-1 T7
x
,,
I ®- MYqvNw s, _—__ 'a.i
.� � `" ?7 ay3 IWO
rwrK+ . '- »viaa pa.
lla
eH: ^l�fl^ I 1�� .o,g
N p yll i ijam ,. .
e I I )• 7do' I 45141111
: d'yJ 1 YID Sd PAYJO® {i ` ^,ITJ
� LJ a
4 I r 9 til • a
1
t ' 1 it 1
•
\ T g
,r d'b ® 8 0 6 0
•
®
Z 1(i) • „yr., (-1) tr(riro VA J y .4 ,r r,, I ? T . ..
_____ __„_ • g
_,... 1 1 — -I
.:.:.• IFIONENINE011 :..
--1 ,f111011•11111IN .
>
• IAA.,nu..rlAw t...
a .gni,
• - - ' .,
.. 'IIIIIIMIIMMil
. ., I 1
0
.. ..,.:1- ._.,,,..f .T.:.. ..-..._ zAt,14
_
r GI.r.vo.-ri t-i. w7- a ence et...cVATI,n1
2--_ [.• I
. .
f f 4),,,,,, T 4,-, ? ,Ger,,c,) '4*-rl-
.7 s+.,sormer.g..? fryr) 0
T
4) Fr:,..„....„,..,...r, .. ..,..,.......1) .
. . •
.1" .. ,
.. . .• .
. .
. . -I I
I I .
. .
1111111111111. I . .
. . lir
74— J -- 1 :.:6:1111 JO-- ------ —_
. -:,.'-'- •!'. --- ..— . . —
.
-- _ L—_. \ i
.. i
I, . •• - -• 1 .
..... '-
' rinkl-NORM ATV,'
ELEV \L to r,H.A..F....L. J
T1 7 T 0
_ ._ , y.....e.„,
V:....r. z-,.:..T.:: c? .7 7 •
. .
. . . .i
.. , •• •. .
+-.
i . ,
q„„,...4.4rto•I_
t P.*,r,.,„,,,,,, I .
fy:::,...r,7:T i"I.- w --1-' 1_-es.,,,.-r.o,,j_ i',..KT,-•‘.- ,---,,.TH a l•EV71-i or.]
&
0 0
Ti T c?
u
.... .,..,• 5)
Ti 5) 7 7 4. ®
? ,..I.•.. •-I uNe.
, -...,-...
• ',fig "Oa,.
i . U.-2 1-
. _
•
Z D
_I T 0
I ,e
• . , _ D 3
• _---°, . ..ti-er.-. • :--- [—I • 1 . 611 -
• ..., — • -•-• 0,
• ,,--..' • Z\3
......r.":7,=.—.. 1.1) z
r.....--r 1., was-r e,..e.,...-r I.,t-J P"FCT.".-. 'ePLYTH EL.-Ms/ATI,!--1 0,....-T El...6,4,-1-1,1.1-1.....--)E IN.?grif VtenZir 0 ID,. Li
. ? 7 9) ? ® . T T ¶
,rd < A g
-A IP
i 8
a
ND to i
. • .
n
,,-.::,..T,,...., ---,-,_, e LE-VAT,•=,c-.4 . 1 0 E 4
• 11 3E1 !
cq m• 1
g
.... ,
U-I AS •
1 c *
. .
. .
5
/
_-- L \
PLANT LEGEND A
SYMBOL IB OTANICA L/COMMON NAME OTY�I SIZE REMARKS 1
i LIXIUIDAMEIM OTS ALIFLU/�'Y.IEEi C4UH 134 I/1' SfRAVnHf TRUNK,FIILL HEA+H i t 5 0
•Q PINUS NV{/A�AU$?RL4N PINE lB 5'-4' FULL{I ROSIlY
O ALER UKUNMUM/VINE.MAPLC ='Z' S-A MULTI-TRUNK 4 u
I Q CUNiPERUS L'-TORUCASA%NOLLYWWD 7 C T' MULTI SitM • I '• m;
OKNu5.tOiLYIIPEFLP/REK,NODWWmD 9 3l,AL. PULL 4 SJSHy I Ha
E- -EXISTING STORAGE U :rtn-ONIA/,.U$ DISUII.0K/Oct,+SPRAY 131 34AL FULL}6J5HY
EXISTING BUILDING •
al!IIGrr.1I C,AULTNSKIA SHALLON/SALAL I VT AL. .5'O.L. I
yam/.�I AY:4EHILUM LPLUNIJ�S'.. ASWO/R11 4' �•O. .
I .
•
I I �� H/ORnSEEL XSI`II N(v YE4 ETA1 iW
` 'I - I WNEzE >I•iNRP.F.D
�I I .ii .. I .I
• I. . •I OOD
--- --- -- --— f4�.- FUT
'
•
C C m rW Nv-r.oM.A+WrI/or+tcra 4+�2 kAYEL LK TPPP•OvE.D•
_ >]Ib MI�:S WAL ynPRMIaN SAND�4:1( '
,e.cam'_ 'O.. , a•f I;r. .A- - _ NOTE i
HALF COURT BASKETBALL .41..
ql i A
'�f BUILDING B / • / A
J �, B'-12•TREES.V :� i
Q �i.. * • • tL ; lI i' �_
i lA• .C I r i �� I ' '
I 2A'BERM - C • v __ ^a-e'`-='-=--- I ._ / a
1, I C _ -/1 1 (:� :'' CC
•
• � ' IWETLANDS TO REMAIN /O
J BUILDING A C WETLANDS TO REMAIN- 0.
•
i - • ---0;- ,-, //....:: /I
ix
--- • :
• 1 / =
ILI
` SAVE EXISTIN. TREES/ _' L' -- ''/ F
-••/1• z Z
•
- `OPICNIC AREA
��Il' GIO
. I-Y '! ' PNL�p
. ) THCPN •
- aOP ■
\-------\•••••:.....,.
eOP``�D
..0 u•XB W. NM LA A`O.., Q
.e.,»w..,,I.rsnA »N 1...10......., d
»Aw wuw:w..a•rn wEAw.I.�.:w.r.e xsu.wi
,� ��'/ rrr..ew T ...� L7 �i
. �� AArorriA '�.0 a: w+."Bi+ I�`BCI""" .
.e s4 Ra •
w�* 1 �w`�n p•.rlUiw i l Z ,,.�/r��
r ! t Or O5J+P.•✓T nal w kR.PR«T nw < R
J IE
Pew.B..� . uwe.«.
•
.r�I .N. UJE ° I
e
/TYTT krcN T•w»wNu • a
ru.rMw�» E0 x
ei t*I z yy
SCALE I•:Ao•-o' 'LW,w Z A
,- A TREE/STAKNG B. TREE/STAKING (�` TYPICAL GROUNDCOVER SPACING `
L-1
IM Bier AREA. T. IN LAWN ABEAE NT. - Xi
1.• .
•
•
III
iii
■.i
,1',
I„I •
IIlit III .
1
.111
t.
-'■■■
��i■■■ III
F.E iii
F.o i U
t`' d ' A i:ii °. ill1111
ni
P
Zz•
,
.,■■■
=■■M
ANIMIII .:r,:
I I f� _.
1
•
•
, BLDG. ? ex•MKIGK ELEVATIoNe cirR bUTION FACILI-r1 FOR Ise no'
> ' •lance mueller 5RUGE 13UIVI CO.
L. & associate¢
eti.aw d
architects ala KENTON I WHHI NGTON .
- 130 I.k..W.....stl.ribs,6Ot¢¢•¢00 3¢6¢663
•
•
•
DESCRIPTION
,tWunl m
myr
G n n W l Dom.
v[� Y•,[n
'Minn 23 W
exit-fuv j[��. J OJT,
'it[INC r u rc r[mu r x nne ASFLOW,.
J • I • mnac ,u Wart,mart ,mrs [on,>,m VE H
uD
• N 1.9. .OP c \ N .v.a/ �� °f K - Wa,rza'1 n nix.NM 'Avo KW uov ,i�[ o z
AID
NOS t� �y\���\\�pp G� .6 HA 0•r b O'4•Oz E_ V,,'�.r ` S Lam_ wvrY MM.
'Y St,-[xu[*v'15.34 L�arcr, 'ill
or
,.,p ro-_. Zd_07 v `` O liv..e,o t) JW 17 fr .229.c� ALT.
Y,T.70•Wr'.%i1*'am SLID MM.WEIN. trrt). • ',If1 -1
.53 O U ,•n•xY SACIninC;NOMA Sams Worn.VASTT 411.SO ran TO In ran own or
SO-oo•3�•E \```` `19
14• At an
Lunar Nan TO
n[xni Tani SOUS.01•334 DAST AU. V n
COOL. ;p• SAID vSl.n nit
Z %
i 1O'�.0 zo EaseME[,r J - Q4 `T. \T L 11.115 van Abdo sno ul u,R[ [ �Q a
i
^«+"sw[.s 3W�C'T0 \ il ‘''''--\‘'
9`•l.. TM nor toe'rtair¢Rruv'n Or ,tArz O
`— G /� ?ov `` ` o C p tu.�.uuc pOr ,Pol.wnOS xwivpA Co an ar['•[K of mon.A Min 'tlfr[x.,fl3.Cann ROAD =N
• n _�"-� --_y��— � 4 '' \ ^ w[x[lyr xucn[i.%cr[ ioan, sw[v[urV p��. ;Tad,MTN 114[ Lr xA.[n/�• / ___._____�.._ �� I6 \yo �ra �.� c. 'roFr»:• :t.0.c[rTO A rain vkliCy Ann F-5— 1 �0, .n.,"• ' i Y91• MN.SIM m.rA[.[K ,o.000'sn':pry r:'�or'c'MT TO o:u,,. •a,.o[M.o,.[[,a,.[. ¢
Onalr
o °I, °� ` ` P s SURVEY 1 lui[W ND.: z
•
.\ } mourn.U.SOWN..K z
IJI `Im__. :v` 1cc
,`„ \ WPi,'i�•^-r�oa-vf I dtr ,200,unu. AVERVL[MT
u[[Kiox : =V.g>
Cn
ke • I...�cro...uPs 4! � { \1l / ao rzurxoK. <soe,xs'spi,%. g
o:\ \ - amnm TO: CO S;
\yam •` \,,
\ \ \\ / e ,ra.lr TITS aw..xr ar xMx[xacx INC.
MI5 IS TO I. \0 c J `so.� ._"-- 10
\ -fir oa�" 1 _- , r' .r.ta/�ADI.Acc ['V SEaW,unr,[TOR
u
o z••..I •fie' /_�
�' ` - °f� _ `, NMSxrc JOINT. nr,. Wruw nn[n AIM
\ ttli ..
l 1 1 —.A xix(S St IM A,)uF TAM
[u,
.✓�... \ •.•� zr.- `` .ir/PI/ ...NOS In. cicor 4�n L...r�
Y''''
• I n„q ` \ .h .// ` 1/A ,[cur,Anox xo ( ,•
cnassm o,,. ue.•n rurna n xuc xc orxca xuuxrr ,rrrt
`� I I 1 4. ,//%1 F Buns i
• G I i 1 I \ z\�• —�\O �� n r 4 4 ,-� \ / O—) �[
\ \ i---.:zd'.-- -
•
4fV •y, cA N J \ ', �� �� NOwzowrf t. ,-'1
'� ,30 J . 1 �\• �0 H 7� Ot,ce6 GQL~•...TC.`�sm�o.-.66CeOP..E. I r
't' ' /\iV ` + `• ,__ /0' 1 [ai_v u�ux+.~�u02-.Oi a�
.<� I VETir�G.•-L<7 le
a.
1 i .
. .. r� .r \ \ \ os:.w�ew`ow socE.oe.r.Ls /�y�'';oi �d �.w.e,..,E 0
l P;1 [ e �� �•\. er` ,rrog.�.= •50,002 59.F..IO 33Ac.2 0
z.cvill 1, 0••. \\ \ c � �✓ �"1 4 + 1I�
2
•
u i
_moo o «« sj• \ ✓ �/ y�`� >.a9 S �0
/..;ro wry' W
- L0. Qool 0 3
51. O pl 0
CO
I„.au Kee I _-._ ,....-,.
Jo
7-- L6 4AN
-
I-30
H9 L19.0I
t
•
••
• .-.- Jolt.:5-1-..e..-r .egc-ier,e,, GIPZ OALE.40..,E e4e."J.
pa. +
... ----
------------- \. Ti5Ale ........,' ---'--
i°0 ...
----.....'''•. -1---
--- \ .
\ _. .._.(0)'--- \i -..---',.
1--,--- rt.., ---.. c.. .
--",. .• vo •litiu"Ruu..........01.1.1aulamuumeoupu.vax,............y.......auguau.n,aruoum17.-"-Fr''.- tviuul.....a.v.u.....o.tumm.,.....4_5. -./.51u.i.ou.e.n.--——_. ..e_1_,,s,„..,,,,,
,rallaift -0 A 1‹E S 0 A L. E s:"A J,E N g S.W. c-....,-,'\I
.,„______ .",__ i
____, ____. ...
I
\ ....---J-------r-'D , ..._.,-- . _ ::.,__
___,..••_--- •.\I!„... ._ . ..,,, ____ :_,. . k.::................__ .•: - ,......... ' i10.2......--74±-- :----' _„...... t7p-,11-11 ,14... .. ...=.". --
• ______-- r_____---.•-:.:_. ,i.;;_,- • ;:,,. 0 --•—0141, 801.1.-/O•
Pae%. 6 .-f0 ,. ..,•::',- ...',' ?,.....,,' - Ilikaalle.- , . •.:;''., 9,..-.:'..' ...::..;',::''' ..:•-•;,.... 4— .ss .9 : c.,..,3 er,,,,,, ....................... •i:::::=:-----.- 74.2 .;
?.4107.:..',''....;- :::'..:14.'''';',,,. .. ... 1641,.., ,40 ,,,,:,. ,,,:;,..".-:::'::.i::'.,.•:.*'6.,-: .:,''.:::::::.:':-.1).s... ,-,!..,,,,k.m.:;.7.tilt'',Alibb, ..)-------%°_,./. , • LC.11.1.1 •-... 0:,- ;
I —•-,
3:f....; .: ': '' '''' .. 19:"' 1. / :'...:'::.%';')1 e%.•,. .'1 .S ' '''1:;.::..:::::•. ;e:-.;',... . . ,', , lir 11.11.9 IIIMMIM - ;•J''., 'i L EC;EN 0 MU',
OD -
e 711 ",-,'-.,...•,-,•• ,.:-,,--••:•:•-. . .: gs,5 .-:.0 :•:.; ,cZ,;',...,.7‘.5'„.:4 i.o!r.r.. .. ,..... ....'.4.at_ ,,•; "-: '`;‘ ,l ,: G 0,, . — •,. CESCRIPTION srmeoL
sc-b‘" / , .,'''..-.. 11!:' •••'..,..,,ri4ri-gk' ,i......' ..,.."i AF...:,(3I ..,75.i, lz. ,I.f.:L. 4 Ai i..;: :,.. ',:'...:', .. \ 11,0PERTY LINE --- 1 Z •
.---- l', ''• , ON..;.ev,::- EXISTCONTOUR
r'•'5•" I '''''''''` • '' ''.'•••• '- ''r • • • • ":•,. ..t1-7--.-. ..a• .... .- • a'•• •eV • '.,-:,-4.--.'", . ',. PROPOSED OX.1100R. —,fg,— 0 L.:.1
•
1. i ,,,--....:.1 Z
W,..
---........,, 1,,, ----2
1/ 41'gli 45' I 55' I 55' I 55' I 55' ;I 55' I 55' I 5.f...
: I'
\ I 41 ------
_ •
• ,
,... .„: : ocr,i ,.._
PPJP.O°fOr'&5e0 SPOT e-EVATION --1-6- - f.,
PROPoSE0 G•CONC.CORPS -
-L Z
• ,.! ..o,. st
/ ... . ...6,
' OXECTION OF DRAINACIE —--
' j )i. ..:'''i. ' D
EXIST EaiE OF FAVEMENT-.-.—__
I ,
kx....1e,go..-1-1 ) \\ - ., / . i/Z .Ifig.., EXI57:STORM DR.IN =•= .:‘
1 \t . .,''''." ------- 0/ PROPOSE°570R/11 ORA/N I
• '',\,\.\ .k il /
P‘soeosEo a/ht.oiNc-i .
.-- g . •-.' 4'11,..- ....„ ., .., PROPOSED INLET(TYPE X 1-0— IX
-• ../•'' c, PROPOSE°INLET(rYPE 11)-0--
.\ ‘ .
,„ FINISH Ft-OOP,. Co.
/
,....,... '
'( I .
, 0 e .1."'
WAVY PVMT.SECTIO4 1,..."1T2. .
....:.1,-•- ' i 1 1 • :
- - ''..c\\(Wt;t, . e / ., , i,ii.,-/-
• 4, NOR.A111-fVHr 5.5e.Ton/ ------1 . -
\.-P , ..
, ,----- _._..........11
. . .
.,,,... ..„ . ---- i.:..I pv,,., „ .• ,
. ,
, , , , ,.. ,,, ,,,I\ ,,... , . ..., ,
, ,
... , , u... .,
\ \L , C.1).•11,;?1TrtIL_L.542.1.,Y / ; / igfet. / ,s2, •.,.--)Y ,
re.n•so .-
/
illin.nit... i .11.55 •
1
17---- ...x....)_ R .,./ .,..04i,0.41,4 (we...0 / „
1 I /
(
,,,,, •.• ..:/I ''
,- Te 2% ) .41.2' i 1 ‘:,
-----
At .....
.. .
--__.--..
:,::17::..';'.'''-:...:•'_.' '. ''' :r.'j.. ''''. -''' '.' ..'''''''' ':'•".:. - : 9'; ''''' .
SECT; -X.
1 '
?..:7140\17 It.q.r ,•-.na,'"-"---V r'''''''''is'i,'". • ,_I '-' i " '
5.aps,-rgx-rt.o S We.n..e i I i . • •••
e
enetc.1,.) ..÷-1 -1,..1..30 84 1, 11.;1;'..'.7,••,',J( ••• 0 .L, - ,...
0 1 errec Jr-549 t-s 1 a T.0.11,00 Itt ,... 4
• ./..... . ..4
1.20
\' •\\'. VA 0 C13..f,(71,Er 1,5139
/71:.Z..'1.•:f. s, 311=
,
litf,c- . •
, • ...
• ..,.•. 7--- /, ---..- . , ,-. .w""., :
4 ,
0 ± E.. 1; •••/ f X135. ' 1 1p• ).• 6 til---• \e.- .\ frvAin .1,• .7. .7117--n.:7•••,:&.41,:‘ .7.77.• -:, \
. -.... .\\ ,,,,cise,..1-.112,....„'„.-,..,15Z t 26.CP O. - •.. 4 ,:, , &MC.5 7-S,. //4.1,1.1 t r''''''''
. \.... C'' ...':.:4 4 P''''.' 1-'; .ell 7...2.'pal ". • ree; Al
••>'s fa/4:V' 1 •
'pov.c.557-S,I9 0/2/ ..,X0 +
200 4./..//172 \
)1(. ,' h i 1'4' lil I Q
s'`f-,' A .•s'..'.;;....: .:.,'..'''.‘:' .1 '..1*::. . iZ.ceTti.5''''''•F`I '. •svus.s[JOE o S...43c0
VICINITY MAP MAP % ,..,.. .,, ,,
E00E 1 .1?Il ll 2 il lill rill I f '''; ' '''
2( WETLANDS . 1
t11 0 ,
''''‘.,''4,'4:K., 7,---4-...;4‘iii,-,-W • . .. . .. . \ e.,,,,,,OT L....6 -,,, . 4. ;!---- • I
,L::
--
•-
•
\1/4,2,....:,,,\ \IY-,—,4.7",-----:-.:I--•I,-- ,.,,.. /,,, j \ ,.r , ,-i I I r 17,. \ ••••..E z
. .I'''',...,;:\ ,.• 1-.•-,-;,.....- - .27,4411!,.;• .....4\. \\\ ‘C"‘ //.Q4V \ ..1-"--17. -_ 'I- 3
x tr,
NA i/"-----. • ....41!
•••\ .t.• ,‘,..''.......,. q3,-...\ \\•\ ,......Ts--------t.,___::;7 ,o' ,---- .7,--
ii-
. Ncitve.tV4.4. SITE__ . .
•:...--•:.• '\,••`'',''% ', 't...,..." borrr.o.r oL.5,...“ ,..y' ,
:.•.."`,.• .,..________:,-- ,.,
' / i -I-1—.-F-- -,....-L-72 ..,_ - ---.3-' -5.\.;i: Fi'li.. atjA• '4.1'44. •
1 ( ' A,PPIT.c0,...urirr 0.0 weeKI-n-itis,
.. ' • 7' • i
! ,r7 ____. s:•zo-q. 7..40' 3121-90
CALL 48 HOURS .-
• \11\\.::,,‘s\,\`,. . '0,7.-rE,:k.l.Wog.ca.coca...c.a.-104-r . , .
89046.04
.,......./.
/I . , - BEFORE YOU DIG
'T
tk.-1-`1-_,_ .:I ...•;c11.! :: .:n \ '-'''''\•\••\\•
\'';,I.•;,\,i:. i \
I 1-800-424-5555
- -_ -
_ .
• .
•
•
•
Ir MA TCI LINE rT T / an. NOTES POI.N,�...S ea yc
/ .•9.x 1. .MITA. K. .NAL.•L POLYVINYL CHLORIN.(PVC).KN..OAN..T.O MTN "o
j r N SOI..'SDI S1." aE W
////�IiI_1 rsi, ftlto9D s‘e s: .MINA.MANHOLES SEVER.NA.LMANHOLES Be APSHALL A.t.NOA. P N NO.A SPECIFIuSIMS,SECTION]-05. :ill
a i \v\ L,'-zoo �/ (VO Y rOtOM .c� BLOOM113C.i SS . a naL PIPE(PLY CUM w
f, lit y , ii I D P. ..K <,.�P.. STANDARD
1\ II p�_ /= �( caGLL SE
CH II( W /,,'{ I " \ WIDTH.INSIDEAMEN • .LOVE THE PIP.. .THEM IS NO LIMIT ? J
IL r -,( 1r . .\ \ LN,s, �I of ¢0
/ ( I • \ S,o C7-,
I 'III' 0 ' I t- >
I ; I I �it I Iii
A �\ r-rae.... LeT.IJE\— Y P-�—w.,e--- ------ \I °2f¢
/ MATCH L,NE N I —rrePOSce 20.JIOE E41Eneetr--�,s \---`�—�:.r_I..dE —ion----------� WZ
( I 1.3e S.E G'cS Go.a•% S.E.IS..2�,- f • �- SKO<S Qo,aY. _• I ?U
D
I •' II I I. ..c b:K e2•/ 124o1.•SSk ^ __.. _ ._—. . _._.� ~`� _ ._\ .__ -- I CO R
.___� _._.— __— .___.. - _e 7. N �I�Itoc PUNn��N.cTION _ --- -- —�— —.___ —
>< nLL.li =MM
I` D-JP �r Yo rFe.E o. ` G4 Et.to, - TL,II,I•S IW
( I.E.IR le as I� •I / tll F'j �6�ib IJ1. Y.�1v s \/ I .E.IM�-
P.ePRt
la.lc ra . ..at.r.1 \ I 'E wi
1 ° 1 1 DO I.E.15.4 __ ___ •- ___ _- i.E.li.Tl.wY _. •• _ __ _ _^ ___..._.-___
_-._.___.._ AI _.-___ -._ __ .- -_.___ _AI. •
.
•
33 .E.2a3 u�TOe a
•
i 1 IL_� ..
r
i _ _ _.. .. __ _ _ _ _ 15
_. ._. • _—_ _._ ._—
L ST�� not
•
•
II 1
._ ,.. i ,
:'
II
HTT : '
_- _
•
o- .tW . 'lA _ F I
•
� ... coAlw S.Mio •
• � I I19 _ 20 _. y
(.1 h
_
•
•
• .. . . E.e.TI.d. ave...\______._
r _
•
-- - - - - - - _ J•
N- ii f— 43 .
WO a
Dao4Y.' . lb W
.
_ I la_ __ IT __ .. __ _la__, _
•
1-1a,1. e1i Q�g e° °OP. y U
I' ! _ - .. Boll •
wlr 23S' rI
b- _• s•.!• i .
• 'I •
, $ R.MC
�— - — CALL 4R HOURS {
•
I
=� I . BEFORE;YOU RIO a 8924e.4'4
I' ... . . ... :I: . . : - 1.800424.5555.E . . . c-3v 8
•
�r��.riz z
ca.ff uuEo EX/5'T- RILE • 1-Iz)..o CrH)�.r�) I-Ia rt...rl,-,-, rvR u l.0 ze«.o `.,= E -�
�� a --..bv.[ M1) --rry 4. c. nw r+-r.� t J
-•10•m.V. --6'6.V.(Fl ) PE N 6Y1 G.j-- ¢ t
..—.RK..I•./4 �uG.g�.-.l.-lu6 N -S cou3-ku�i(b PRIOR (1) 2
Zee 1..F ,2'P[o et_s2 22'S LF-•/2"v/.P. GL. 2 ,
o ^' G rs —.a ELF ( "S f u4 12• .3 -. .. .
, O A K E S A L A /V C_ O.�o e sz ,D,.xx.ts sr /
s a ".,3x
ci
'f' ... .. .. carao'E.SiYc. EIOJ) 'APR.LEy i4,o� Z ;
y u)
F . E NA ER H4 E� • pj (n¢
I �� _ . _._ =7
Il
•
�rt rf-- Igo;-,, J-).ETE2 ;do.2/ _— .. — moo _
— -----------"----------- - •- ----------\ - - -
1_as'ea�or���- -��_ --- n Is•e+.,r •
"---- ,f�I I-...._..•r G-1 IF‘-).) �f S.o a
J \. ` (-NP) S'iIo•. I+6'G.V.
+ ��:u.:.eE•.o( ):>?S �0 i'. \0\2/ i •
i JLo..irw tiv , / a!f¢ 3�
*�Fv/. `_._fry\,�•-i?, � < �/ `/ ►�`�I Cou. air�u.�Ff') Co. S'l7YPe.n IyJZ
I..Io ccTc�YSIc �•0._�2!G r�E..`r '*S( / n:'� 1/�i fX-'I �(J o.
y �. 1-l0+� -e.,-,1.• '-., H6tT[W.T6R Q �. I\ O I"tLQ �LtL rEYnn.4AT.Gi I�b•a.,J.(Lq - 5
o I. /l. IrF g. .� sz i.� 2/2 L —/S"/�0.3C 90 I\ \'� ("
„A c\ j- :C}'• . --,-.... --?, 1 ‘G.\"/ ---------„,,,, j_N 1 y
1 ...... 1...v. / . • a I
li
,- Plz�posep but L..vINa=
S 1 J�
s T - —
-s 4
N 'SHT..T-4r ` - ��-4 s•
_,.
o �aw.ir::) •i.•�� 1
_ I-I�..Iz-r�x(rIJ.FI..
1 ,T 1—I1 i•.- 6M:1."-.HJ) �J ? 1
. _ 1�Co .pa er✓II_IG J) ✓T,✓✓EO UI 'aofot Eo dFwWm' I ' ,
,1Bo✓E I r
•
i6`L. 3d+" '-') A i S HT.C-5 -� :I •
EaltTl,I W w“Jb
f.ova,eFaXt.IA,M0. 6-1
1 11 e
s{ j; - _ �/ o SHT.0 7 e
. i-. ,-- - ,;i 0' .� _ --. ..____. \ /1\ ram.. _-,_1 W
-' JI -u1L Imo""`.`rI"') KEY MAP ' 3
'/ � ^ SCALE: I••200'
II/� .O :O).P• . Y1,. ' IS'E5H2(Tyr.) i < W
f, Z,5v '�I� 1[n gi
/ r — of __ - ���o
' ): ) ) NOTE:REFER To FIJItu aaADIJG 1 1 Ili
-p' �..._.
/ \ */ '1 t'f E 1 _Ft:<l8'7��'E.I;� fi.#`7(T)'PE Ii +L,,,./ Q'. __•_ 7. ./ _._TJ r ( __ C REJ SEM L-2 Loa raEC14E 6a..oES. Ste//I 00 G/r R.H E.
% jj= ;C _E �O 7.E 15.50 h.4N L.
e.
`: -- E li�'��S /E 57 I.E. 13.15.../.\ z_so-ao I"=zd 3-2. o
i I R \ CALL 48 HOURS
,,;^ — —�/5'� v Bff{)RE YOU DIG E39T/b.oa
- _ ,/^ 1 I - ,�„ :/.,, .-. ,f,,,1-, "J i'
bet 6u-r.l a-s • I 1-800-424-5555 .,..a-4.8
\ i .43••••
ILIII .:..Iti
.
.
- 1 C-47,-1,1...ILIELP etre.1-0,-/
" \ \
I'_"".."-',..I'V.,14,4,..,-',"1"6-,..e.,..,...(1-4.1,.:..0'LL) -
It: '4"...:II I /
i :7,II • / e'. ......,
t\ k \..&-°- ..
tr) 3, 1 '''...<'--,,-Ft il . .
• •
1 ' ,± Lc-,
\\ \0
1,0 I ..1.: (If .
\ In • 1 •'1 0 '
•
0.-
di'• . . ..;
• I:'4;1'f:1.W c'"''') ---1
< '<fl .
.. .
.'
r' .../
40 l-ftet,Olt,Gt.-52- i :II '.4, • ....-
1 . J, ,2,..., i ' Plz-c•pc:•• c, E,u IL..c,n•-.1 , Ge5..1C-e.L.c.e.....i.e.. '
...i.....,'-'. ci :
z ;
. • ,6•7
\
• t., n...., .
..--, ,• -
..-• 712 t''.
t .....," .. '
i 6,4 14-91 .
1 ' ... sa u• 1 l'' 1"--.12e.C.,1?...0"",../,F1.-) " .
. . .,...". . '.. ./........,..„.........' 0,jj
I, ".. i '''''. /,..,",-.1 "I• 2-5-l.t;t•L;EP."-'21..." - , . 1 ei.......*:.. 23.......„...... . i . " Z,
= .
' - .- .------- --.D
'... -.•...- -. ,.. . ! .:- e..c......c-eX-Ce-,-.1.-Ife. "''''''' )1(f)'.. . i En
%."---
...`III.' t.:.2.../I----‘"I"'•(:-‘''' ,___,-.'-"" , . -..."-""...: 0 0
. • ..r.. •-•.-------- : --
• 1 ad g
. - -
-I'•-..._ ----,r-'---&\1.1_ ,., . _ ., , \\%2(--•c,?e!.`••--0-,i,"?8 02 • . .., ..,..,: .ts c''',
-...
. r ----•-_, /.0,2 -9. - 0 L.
. •
/..'-k • .3 L.-1721,1J,•.•(;-4.-. "2-.
I-:--1-2-.Z=f•OCe-'4',IttlI) t./\'-cr -III-"".• . _,_. _._,..• .•-•-...._ ...._ .:, ...._ " "' .•- . •
.•
IN'-'," 0 z :-•
Gral.-2(....,,,,...e..64.1.,...u...
_..-- • ..- _. .
0 '
.,--5 .:
....0 .
0 Y
_ t': . • ___..• .-• .. •• - - t•-•-.2.7-24,15.-It5 0.-1.l)
0 :--..0.I'I C....45,.....p......-1.........0...,,. I 5.2-0 03 1
't sl-...•IS1 I..). .. .
A :-.I(li..I •
. . • Gli
. 1
. .. 1
. ;
• •— —.---,-.----..,--__._------...—_---...--.. .__ .,..._...._
130./,5•CC2.7‘.9 1 : •
1 , I
L---. ..,..--oc...r.,,,,) ':• 1
p_ .
-' • I-- - au„__.„,,••_,, . 1
..I 4 I 1
. (,. ' te Iso rt tit 3
.." ei 3
/=.9'•••-••5,..$ L-G.--112.I.t5.1.1.:""31 GI-. 57.. ... tl <I ...„ :
\ --' I.I •
. • I I ' ,---- .. ... _ . ._ .) • 14-.5
. 1 —
,, ,,....,.61 •: '-. ..
. \'il fi r • et
li ?.
:
C .a. 0-'3(TYPE z-_:•-,54,) r 4 ,
: r•e-IG.Cro I Et .
PI • (..-'..-:"/-).':-f-r.,.:.:T.-f.•• ''0."3..4-',/ 1 .._•
• ,1 iiY.L.e:ys 1•11/
z 1 '• 1 : .
•.,
C.5•••-it:S(7 -r P,'_::-.1,1:•-54''..f, i
i te=jreCw.•,7<:,''a4.______ /•''''') 4-^to ---• ---- i Z
I S.50 I
. , 0 .;,..."-•,:- !.:2 ,r.--..-: - 0.,..,0..i .-....1 --,........_ '-.,....
.___ J ‘••••
1
i.e. I•/.0 4-* t., i
•'5' 1 di . -•-.1 µ
* t
P RC>PC 3•,- EU> .
t3 UIL-1,1,--16., ' '; N't '-i. '
.
I • 11... ?. z .,
. .•I -- r..-
.( ), . Lti
5L.F—'Za"- ,-,- • •, • Cle755.1tile•Cl-teg.bEl...041) .
. -
1... C, mete,L-.IL:71.ft,...../.C.-4-H,,,,,: tr.,,,,,j) .1, ,............,:„.... ,,..•;.
1 3 C 4-F 7: '...;.:41."ti.;)0••2.a. ‘:i". ''.-'-'), 1.,. . ' ' ;z::,:f-i..1•61,,i,`,., .-,z_r•--r.,_us•-...,) -•-—.) :I ....
,._...:„.u.c.......) .••
G..01.....•rif.,,,,,-"-11...16 • hee.5..c
-----. . ! s'..V, .r.• -.•••':i I".2.0.
•-U•Go Ft!
•,.... -•• ._./V C 5 c._- 2-5,4
,. 1•,.,
• .: .„...------ -•-) ,-",-, <'•-_-.-..•-•-; .
----•-•/-:"5:SC'
: AT -
v./ E R,5-E.pc---,-...47cr , 4
CAU 48 HOURS
• r I. ' ' — .....„.
,..._.< • f-- -9.a-I-
\ (•-\(0/ ' "1(-7.7------: -.--_ :i'‘'.(-1• '1:5 ri.?-(5•_•:•?. •::-,,,,. Octet:Of ten 'to [....1.,1 vec.c......le.
. . P....,..1 51.1,C-2 F...t.Peer..15.(--...peAc•C.,
,
• , • --;
, • --.-• BEFORE YOU DIG ..'4-
.
. . 1-80B-424-5555 ....c_s_8
, .
. .
. • . .
. _ -
•
• .
' . .. .... ... .
, -„, s, -• ,-.
. n-) , ! ....--. .
•:?,
j`..)--..._____1, 6,.. . • ,-...,..... v i 1
\•__,- .,, i i-/EIII••Ta'ap.do CFO •
• '
•
. --z• • . 0--., ,,, • .:\ . .... .„,
• ' ,.
,_/e•gLx F1-I At:Pig-0X- • %,'a 1') /
•--....„, • . , - 0 4,„,
51-.CkJd,.-
...-- . .
•
.---- / • .--- . ..--(line A • .. • . •-- - . ,5. - L_ ---
'.. ..-• _
,K--( . .
,. -- ,
, ., .., -... ... -
,_ ,....
, o, s, • .
- ' :.• .
-I I_ . ,( .7'1 J. --.
'• - •.,
,..„ .. .. 1 lb • 81
0
- 1 0 --.. ., I ; -t.
F.. ;
Lu
/ , ______-,, \
- -, . --..•-•.5-Z. rw...„ - r"-/OZ,i.-,-
• - •
7 -'
i 4 j _.____....N.\ \ 1 .,
/- • __
t.L.1 .__. ,
6 • , -
.. / '-. 1 .1 I 2
. r-./....,cr••••ie.1,5!
•.. . 0, is LI-rx.tS.14..5 III (1)0 r
0?r,
-Z i . - . .• .-. -a---).‘ i\ le;:.-5.• • , 111 Z>
\ I I .. ----- -- -- '• -------•- - -.
. .... . .. ..... . . (.0 . --rs En-r rv,
:.-• . `5,‘.... 1-,--- \ ! ) 7-- ..,-, -1 ; ,
i --------------------------------1.- --:'.;'); rq,i ).-
I.ZS.
cP --.... .
; •;,-.5.•'..•-•.' ---,--- - .li .'
0:. --- . •--::.
Q.> ,F...
_.; ... . .,---
. e...: 1-121 A 1 . ;.. .•.•,1-...--•1)....-- _____ _ SI : ,--1 - 0 tj
• C4,j • .-7../ r.- •&., f ,r I..,. `'' U U.I
•
/,
•:...'.'rn i....•.,.,;.":,..; ..... "'''' ,!,, l
Aco• e - o'2 t.
iti :
.4 .. / 1 N3 ---,. . . •s.\../-;.- - -)
k- 1 r -,___.! , ..„....i, , .. i,„`-'. q 'f v, : s --,1 N- , - ..- V,m. --
. - -- !--- •.r_ (--.--, - -:1 1 , `,! •IVZS D '
. 0 al
kJ . , 1 ,6. • ! .- • - .... .,!:.. !.... . ..r,c6"..-
,
. Y 0. ra / 4.-- -,, • ,
,•
. ,, )ea* .I' •
! . /0) 11 I • , Gli
o
P..20. - .
,. . .
:_.'../
SEE SHEET X10.C-4!I ,:-..,2; ' 11:1 .--;, ! - 1 .3gE i,si-tea-/- No. C-5 WI ' •
. 1
- -,...".-.1 -E.;V••-...1..77=---Cr.".€I. 7. , ! 1
..-F...-.-:.:T.',=..--:-..-•
rj.„:„.-L..-E.r.,..ri..F.--7 #1:41=I:4: •.-.4.7...FT.F1---.. rz--r.....-,--:---..._%---r..7.:76, I ; I
. . i
I I I
. INNII .' 141::•'" •. Una'
.....-•=.......... ii . v-...,---- • volehll coo iiii..----rxr-2iF::7.....1::::
IIIINISA. ----- ,
FILL ..,.........._ 1 I
.„=mk
''''''H,_ir"-
13:0„lzhIli I
...,
. Dili(' 1.1111nRe
.!: '2,`k...
;, ..::!:-.r."- iNiiiiliiiril
. -: "MELO&
IELMMil! . A SlAN114" it r,E.- I . CROSS(NJ x FL)VERTICAL TAPPING TEE L VALVE
2- BLIND FLANGES ONE TAPPED 2- 1-PLUG Wart TEmP CROSS DU x FL)VERTICAL r PLUG I•m.m--
C.i_.IT _.........................
-:•-.-.....
-.51.-..1r.:.r.'..... ------•-• I I .
. ..........94........__ ' r„,,..•,...2:4 2-CORP STOP BLOWOFF ASSY 2-BLIND FLANGES ONE TAPPED r PLUG W/TEMP.80 ASSY ...—
r.•'.'"--4''''''"'Orr:77r. F...42.•,,F.:..---:::. r PLUG BLOCK AS REQUIRED 2-CORP STOP BLOCK AS REQUIRED
...7,17-........1...- - EL...."7-.:-..n. In
1"--:Y-i•E Erigiir:: . rat=tr.t. BEFORE BEFORE
,• DETAIL.FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY cr ce
iii 0
•
:14:' .1 DI+41011 e k— •
,
t.--.-......-..:,-;,..F.,, .-... -[.-'2,).- , Irr-077--.=7*---
7.1.-...—---..
Alai il
AFTER PRESSURE AND PURITY iI Z Z- ill ' AFTER PRESSURE AND PURITY REMOVE EXISTING BLOCKING I Q .
CONNECT TO TAPPING VALVE W/ CONNECT TO EXIST WI .1
fillq . •,- NIPPLES NIPPLEISI . .. / .-^- -,--, * k
• .1 gill,. ....h,11.- ,A1' ---- SOLID SLEEVE(LP' ' SOLID SLEEVE ILP) '
'iSieL7,41..1.$1:772.7.:17. •
. ;-.4...... S
---- 10
mli 11Eil1 . ... DETAIL,WATER CONNECTION TYPE II DETAIL WATER CONNECTION TYPE IV i 1 jillail
'' .t< 1
E-PrZ1 - Exa vtnr *ell;il I ... •••=0,40:10t0 ... ..= i!t..,
• 0 0 0 0 0 0 =Lir k 0
10 DETECTOR DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY .
.7=1:1....-... I-V2"B 2"WATER SERVICE DETAIL ---... .......
6"STANDPIPE W/4-2-1/2"NOZZLE ' O.L.M.
CROSS CONNECTION-BACKFLOW PROTECTION ASSEMBLY • 40_0 G.,,,.. ...... ,...
•
rt. , ..20' 3-2/-90
.-1,,rE:REC.To..,M,GR0.1.04E,
• 0100 SLIT C-1.FOB 0RECKE 0.0.00ES. ,I 0y°a,',, CALL 48 HOURS •....,
•_;,..i.,_......• BEFoRE you(G 8.7246.04
. 1,;,, , ,
441,1l,OSW 1-800474-5555 „...c_G. . 8
• . ,
. . • •
_ .
. . ,
4 ..
, -
SEE SHEET NO.C-G R ;
•
•
•
a b - / %LL
^ ` I I I u I ` I � II ;D
i
I IQ out r
°� --,_'. — I --1_.JI / � 4 E
(D 1 r
•
0 ,
kil
{ t �_
�� /
En 0 ,
&1 I I cIc _ �Ll I{/ ? .p41J( /�� �/ I /pLJ =J�• .,p�I e�, 14 /-!2•r IC'T PI/Ni]£7�T1IUU V> ,.
f 'y -�I, J =_��'��� / %I 1 36 W 1-IZ'TAP'/Nfj Cf/(/LIM1) —7
I 1 II
I. ' i Y/ ' V.
1 Cif IP ,- /_ow.C.GLK.INtj =try
2 I / '�� u `Yr$I _ I OE'TArLATPR COHNCCTION V
r y. ]yPEII SMT.Lb) Z
v 2..,
ti
jo. k.,,,,_,-\„%ria 0 2 5.
1 rI I IU r" hf °ILI
LL
�--� I I I C II I ,���I It II, z
I/ 1i GitF /
I
" I )-1,I ' BUJ LD J ��l r 230LF /Z"Qe.o CL.SL r 1, wa6t.9t.a4L(u_¢:a-c�\ i '` i I-1- j/ __ ._
;p �` •�I .'/ r�I ... . - r):Jf� ml ... IS•Es/,r(,v>) ._. --._. I m .
I11 {
_--- �� \ 1 ' Y///, •/" , , , =/// •/, =/;// •//.-/// /,'/ / - . '/. ,-//- //" '/ , /;/;//! I i
_�~� — ate of Y t°� ��- .". .•• y _— l ,'Il ,l .`% .p e ' l'.'i �AC 0 0 W
•
•
T�r1 Et<.t8- I e � --- —_-- "&s/== T=7J'_� —__ — _____— —,fib' e ---- - J
— ems .—
Pe�x raxr. rf. J —_ _ -C... ___��_ ` _
Ie
I / '�� $ i I / W J
SLPy • r s% l � �rvo
�. ,� L o ct
----- y
< I _-__1 430LF_../2. /.v. GL SZ 2 .1 O a
Iii
/ 1 *_:; fP K FFGv/Rfta•�o5 /5'ESA,:(WA?) N2 J J h
I-12•TEC(FL //. Ti3 Z.' (� /*W Q'
l Bust'FOC.CL V QO? �- �'''°'� C V�
-__.-_-L. N rlb�
-- . I % 6 hit !4 a.-.. ..
• Z.ya•4a
1\ k/-\ 1 1 I� CALL 48 HOURS ���co 3-21-90
•
\ I.�� I BEFORE YOU DIG evg46°4
1-80.0.424.5555
REP N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 'L__ARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
2F-112-89 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 112-89'
PROPONENT: Bruce. Blume & Co.
PROJECT TITLE: Blume Distribution Facility
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures , parking
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities . There is a
wetland on the site -- a . 99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project
site is vacant *and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S .W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/2.9/89
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU D
'Transportation Services Division
t J
POLICE DEPARTMENT LS E rRoda
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION DEC 11 4 1989
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
•
s LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: --(- atn5 - - M
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
More information needed per attachment. •
•
•
•
DATE �.Z 2
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZE REP
RESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
•
Blume Distribution Facility
SA-112-89
601 Monster Road SW
1. The proposed development is located in the Grady Way Corridor
Transportation Benefit Zone. Therefore there is a transportation
impact assessment fee as follows:
Building A
a) Warehouse space - 269 , 000 sq. ft.
Trip rate 4 . 882 trips per 1000 sq. ft.
Cost per trip $ 185. 00
269 , 000 X 4 . 882/1000 = 1313 . 26 trips
1313 . 26 trips X $ 185 . 00/trip = $ 242 , 953 . 10
b) Office space - 18 , 000 sq. ft.
Trip rate 22 . 77 trips per 1000 sq. ft.
Cost per trip $ 152 . 00
18 , 000 X 22 . 77/1000 = 409 . 93 trips
409 . 93 trips X $ 152 . 00/trip = $ 62 , 309 . 36
$ 242 , 953 . 10 + $ 62 , 309 . 36 =
$ 305 , 262 . 46 Total fee for Bldg. A
Building B
Warehouse space - 49 , 100 sq. ft.
Trip rate 4 . 882 trips per 1000 sq. ft.
Cost per trip $ 185. 00
49 , 100 X 4 . 882/1000 = 239 . 71 trips
239 . 71 trips X $ 185 . 00/trip = $ 44 , 345 . 65
$ 44 , 345 . 65 Total fee for Bldg. B
Summary for Item 1:
Building A $305, 262 . 46
Building B • $ 44 , 345 . 65
Grand Total Bldg. A & B $349 , 608 . 11
2 . Truck hauling hours restricted during AM and PM peak hours :
a) AM peak hour 7 to 8 : 30 AM
b) PM peak hour 3 : 30 to 6 PM
3 . Bonding for street cleaning required. Recommend $ 5, 000. 00
minimum amount. (Estimated minimum truck trips for fill only
9 , 900 trips) .
4 . Traffic impact study required per transportation systems
guideline. Guidelines are available in the City's Traffic
Engineering office.
5,. Curb, gutters and sidewalk plans required. In addition, street
improvement plans on Oakesdale Ave SW for off-site improvement.
6 . Provide street lighting plans to City standards for Oakesdale Ave
SW as part of off-site improvements. Street light plans to
extend the length of property frontage to Oakesdale Ave SW.
7 . Developer required to initiate undergrounding of the overhead
electrical and communication conductors (power & telephone)
abutting to Oakesdale Ave SW property frontage (also called main
distribution system for power & telephone) .
8 . Proper sight distances for all driveways must be confirmed by a
licensed engineer. Must meet AASHTD standards
Driveway width 30 feet passenger vehicle usage
Driveway width 40 feet large truck usage
9 . Throat of driveway to be designed for high volume of traffic
entering and exiting. Driveway designed to meet ITE standards.
Detailed driveway drawing required showing throat distances, curb
radius and proposed turning lanes from Oakes.dale Ave SW.
Note: Oakesdale Ave SW will be relatively high speed and high
volume when fully developed.. This should be considered when
designing driveways.
10 . Developer to establish a commuter information center for transit
service, ride match service, and van pools .
•
•
•
•
RENT :OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DE1 £MENT
uEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-112-89 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 112-89
PROPONENT: Bruce Blume & Co.
PROJECT TITLE: Blume Distribution Facility
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse)office complex, including two structures , parking .
and service areas , landscaping and recreational amenities . There is a
wetland on the site -- a . 99. acre portion is proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project
site is vacant and is zoned for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S .W.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/29/89
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
XOTHERS : SlofillWAter v41
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING) THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Drm - Vtf lory
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS !( NOT APPROVED
Or\-Sfe " cd-r.,,`Feon r�� �l () l�C. it0—a / In/ I�t (0-7c , h4-
•
(D `eur des �y� r�Ce�s� 7Y in/ F 4c-,( by usm.) 11-4 SGS hrilY,yrof117
mom/ d� Whev Prt.d ote. Jot C(4u/s �1iIGi�G�i i4) v?(oc J ws iN 4.--h2
GAs-e . 0 F a Z d�Sr` Yl cS�Irm , Ah ad°9uwk- 7(6h'1(ov r Eros, or/Scd,✓t a,� 75I 1.�y,
y �
Cur al Oat wI 11 b€ 1r IUlf-4 7-1)4- (00` of ((ooJ )4 4- ) e Shbw�
'44 W CCe-05 A( Pr✓'{ AA' o-1 k-/. eon v vlls)
?1 - r 't DATE I Z zolg�
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR R AUTHO IZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 19, 1989
TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner
FROM: Kim Scattarella, Stormwater Engineering Specialist
SUBJECT: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY REVIEW COMMENTS
The following items need to be addressed on Environmental Review prior to site plan
approval;
1) Biofiltration needs to included on the the Stormwater Drainage Plan. Their plan shows
three Baffled Oil/Water separators that all discharge into the wetland. The verbal
agreement at the meeting was for them to use biofiltration swales for stormwater prior to
it entering the wetlands. The swales must have a depth of less than 2 inches, and a
velocity of less than 1.5 ft./sec. in a 2 year design storm. Baffled oil/water separators are
not needed, as long as there is a Type II Catch Basin ,with a Frop-T type restrictor to
mitigate any possible spills.
2) A soils report needs to accompany the next submittal to examine the fill characteristics,
and the soils characteristics of the surrounding area.
3) The area of fill for the wetlands on-site must not exceed one acre. The City and the
Corps of Engineers will monitor the area of the fill on this site.
cc: Dick Anderson
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIE NG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
•
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNIn
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON .
•
•
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: � �P.Y U+, 1 dhes
. APPROVED APPROVED. WITH CONDITIONS x NOT APPROVEL
ADIJJ=.-clwJa6-- N
E
•
V L f <<
l 1,1> V ✓ `-` ice(�v f�� DATE f /. 9
/( 7-9
SI N T RE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE /
REV. 6/88
•
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PVA /.2 /.L/T'!, 5
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X, NOT APPROVED
'(E�e PrelirninarT Tire redui rem MI' for +he rroposed development ig 8, 500 GSM a)&
//eleVu min cci by 'Kenton fire Dept . 'ih Ex is�inc�. Ci-Y LaYecmain s'.{stern GAtNtioT Provide le a4ave, (P\lcui{e
IIYPi RoH U�-I. l�le WaYI if/ �in�✓. `Der)`Der) (e,commends �'hafi a.Lle�naYo cansYruchon met-hods and the insk Lla)
b� un GlutomahL ci{c/ Sprini'zle✓ s,csVern be usct cel the rectuired i�� -CtoLAJ c,,,a
A OW AnaIlp;s rnusY 1x, ,su�milrek • 'for rcVieuu �tv assuf& f V �h� e)ci5)inc,� 1.�1aYerma.�1). s sYCn
and 42., pra Fos Qd .waYc7mai n lm1r6vemen}'s• ca.h rrw f acd ClY2 -low dema 1 ,{}tc sul,;
AcVe, o rr1 end.
'(lle MaYiitrna.iv) Imrouemenls Furls rn4 car orm }onYon
6pC Ck��S u���t 1 X EE Sanda.a.s ��kloe✓ óC
hiv
1/4fl (12 DATE 2"Z841
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
5nC&r 1 or Z
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIR( ENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE :OBABLE MORE
MINOR __iJOR INFORMATION
. IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth • . °
2 . Air • • °
° ° °
3 . Water ° °
o °
4 . Plants ° °
o ° °
5 . Animals °
6 . Energy & Natural Resources °
67 . Environmental Health ° °
•
8 . Land & Shoreline Use • ° °
° ° °
•
9 . Housing °
10 . Aesthetics 0
o ° °
11. Light & Glare °
12 . Recreation X °
• ° ° °
13 . historic & Cultural Preservation ° • °
° ° °
14 . Transportation • ° • °
° • ° °
15 . Public Services °
•
° O O
16 . Utilities 0
parks 9v rC- -ham,N . �� ,
COMMENTS : /i t4, _ /a/L GLI ...44 t 44 1-0 .
il-rv_4...<' jt_g_e_.e.L-31 4.--:,1,4 . ad-.4(4- 2. ....., (......,
6-4
ya�%6 .Gi-k. 4-0}-�-, r°��-4-4-u a�-.-:� .�� ��P /
2 e"p , 'r /y:VLr.�'c''fi! ' 'mid ' W -12�< L, ,....1.4.4.1-1,0erL/'1-6-- t.
reviewed
i We have this application with particular attention to those areas
in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this
proposal . •
•
-2 /-2 2 .
ignature of Director o Authorized Representative Date!
Rev. 6/88
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: �,(�j L'1-DL
APPROVED ?< APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
• N; 'ID LA. 1L.D icy L: C.c:`Y.p . (-.IG=Cl-G D6--,J
•
j / 4 /
DATE
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR'OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
i-,-- REV. 6/88
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDT"ED HEARING DATE:
UTILITI ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
•
•
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE.
1/ LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Lek tsar
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ,V NOT APPROVED
T2oa,,o-r is I A.M.ok.m sr 'ir 11-41, 114e Alt R AO Ju AL_ R)
L-1
t 10 tf)(L .nL+Lr Plzarecm 0.0 DF 1,0tip 4l Fe- 1464317)so^s kuro ct9 fzcud- rj s
I+� Vs- COMP Pi , . u-►�� CO .. I Ale.rze- w J?bS IS is..1oT-
Ac creibrpeL 4 Nmi ' S l - wasi‘a l i 6 AsJc.b aE-- /uae5'rl
tA►N1M Iles cvL An,db i .
,�:✓) ,,,� ...,. DATE i L i
SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED. REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: fcA(c_c__,
APPROVED ✓ . APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
PiC41) Nov vt.cc1 - P cu✓�c cJ owe t�
Ua\ h 9K-"h cd—
Le) ,��
•
r . ( DATE
SIGNATURE OF REC 0 OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
RE )N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT _-PARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-112-89 APPLICATION NO (S) . : SA 112-89
PROPONENT: Bruce Blume & Co.
'PROJECT TITLE: Blume Distribution Facility
BRIEF. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities . There ' is a
wetland on the site -- a . 99 acre portion is. proposed to be filled and the
remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project
site is vacant and is zoned . for Manufacturing Park use.
LOCATION: 601 Monster Road S .W.
•
TO: •
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12/29/89
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION;` .
K SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
•
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
•
•
OTHERS:
-- COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON
it
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT DIVISION: SA-1 `''"f ' II ` l N
APPROVED ',I_APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
iU 'J�� f:�� 'f i j 'U 1��)
� v Iv ,ry
I' r I`j 11 I I i I•� f �. i
FLU j r=“',t.I
N''ot 1, ;,l II)64 `i�I,r r 13 r
- - DATE _'- -0
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
v3Ac:K=,
J
ILC1 i�t.Lc R. /OucT Div oF .LJt ,ST
11v ,iJ
Si4-112.-8�
y .. CIT OF RENTON
Community Development Department
Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director
May 22, 1990
Arthur L. Hitchings
Bush Road and Hitchings, Inc.
2009 Minor Avenue East
Seattle, WA 98101
RE: Proposed Four Lot Segregation - Blume Distribution
601 Monster Road Southwest
Dear Mr. Hitchings:
We have reviewed your proposal to segregate the Blume Distribution property into four (4) parcels. We
have discussed this with the City Attorney and have no objections to the proposed segregation as shown
on the attached map. Our Engineering Department has checked the legal descriptions for the new parcels
and also has found that they close. Finally, we would like copies of the recorded documents, of the
segregation, for our files.
erely,
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Chief, Current Planning
DKE:kac
cc: James Garrison
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055
„ CITY OF RENTON
ma COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division
May 16, 1990
Mr. Bill Leonard
Department of Ecology
Mail Stop PV-11
Olympia Washington 98504
RE: Blume Distribution (ECF; SA; 112-89)
Dear Mr. Leonard:
I am writing to confirm our telephone conversation of May 14 ,
1990 regarding the Department of Ecology's concerns about the
adequacy of wetlands delineation/mitigation for the above
referenced project (reported in your letter of May 10, 1990) .
I would like to confirm that a wetlands study has been conducted
by a certified wetlands biologist, utilizing standards approved
by the Department of Ecology. Utilizing that information, the
Environmental Review Committee and the Site Plan Review Committee
recommended several measures for mitigation to the wetlands
(based upon your recommendations for improvement ratios for
existing and created emergent wetlands) , for storm water
management systems, as well as for bonding and for monitoring to
ensure continuing protection of those areas.
All appropriate permits will be required to be in place prior to
the applicant being allowed to do any preparation or construction
work on the site.
If you have additional questions or require more information,
please contact me at 235-2550.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
44414.14%
i) -4"4"°‘*‘.4411
Lenora Blauman
Project Manager
cc: Jim Garrison
Blume Distribution Co.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550
„14Tfa
_i!l%i
`ii`• = I:�ki m
1887 dO
STATE OF WASHINGTON ye'' `”'
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000
May 10, 1990
Mr. Don Erickson
City of Renton Planning
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Dear Mr. Erickson:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination
of nonsignificance for the construction of the Blume
Distribution Facility by Bruce Blume (file ECF-112-89) . We
reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following
comments.
1. It is not clear from the checklist how the wetland
boundaries were delineated. If it has not already been done,
a qualified consultant should be hired to delineate the
wetland boundaries using the new federal wetlands delineation
methodology. A report should be prepared that includes
information on the wetland functions and values provided by
the wetland and the potential impacts to these functions re-
sulting from the proposed project. Project design should
avoid or minimize impacts to the wetland where possible.
Proposed mitigation to compensate for unavoidable impacts
should be included in the wetland report. A copy of the
wetlands report should be sent to Ecology's Wetland Section
for review.
2 . A mitigation plan should be prepared which includes both
a construction plan and a detailed revegetation plan.
Ecology recommends using the following acreage replacement
ratios in determining minimum compensation for unavoidable
losses:
2 . 0: 1. 0 for Forested Wetlands
1. 5: 1. 0 for Scrub Shrub Wetlands
1. 25: 1. 0 for Emergent Wetlands
These ratios are to be used for calculating the area of
wetlands to be created. The area should be doubled for
enhancement of existing wetlands.
3 . Placement of any fill in wetlands may require a permit
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
4 . In order to protect the functions and values provided by
•
•
Letter to Don Erickson
May 10, 1990
Page 2
the wetlands on the site, a buffer of native vegetation sho-
uld be retained. The appropriate size of the buffer shouldbe
determined by the values provided by the wetland, the
topography, soils, existing vegetation, and the proposed
adjacent land use. Enhancement of an existing buffer, such
as planting vegetation or constructing a fence, can improve
the protection of wetland values. Our review of available
studies indicates that a minimum buffer of 50 feet is
required in most situations to provide adequate protection of
wetland functions and values.
5. Stormwater runoff contains many pollutants which have an
adverse impact on aquatic systems. Prior to discharge to a
water body, all runoff should be adequately treated. We
recommend the use of a detention basin and/or grass-lined
swales to filter runoff. Two hundred feet of grass-lined
swale with less than 5 percent slope has been proven
effective in removing particulates and hydrocarbon
pollutants. This type of biofiltration has been shown to be
more effective in improving water quality than most vault
oil/water separator systems.
If you have any questions, please call Mr. Bill Leonard of
our Wetlands Section at (206) 438-7161.
Sincerely,
cm
- -'1:72,%Wa2 -27;;1,-61,-2____---
Donald J. Bal s
Environmental Review Section
DJB:
cc: Bill Leonard, BH
CITY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 10, 1990
TO: File
FROM: Jerry Lind, Land Use Inspector/Landscape Planner
SUBJECT: ' Blume Distribution Facility-Wetlands Mitigation Plan
File No. ECF;SA-112-89
:Wetland mitigation plans were submitted to the Planning Division on May 9, 1990, by Shapiro &Associates.
I have had the opportunity to review these landscaping plans: For the most part, the plantings chosen and
plant sizes selected are
both appropriate for the site and will enhance the wetlands;'as requested by staff.
l
I would recommend; however, that.;he number of coniferous trees within the upland areas, particularly
along the east side facing Building "6", be increased in number to provide additional buffering and winter
color.
JFL:kac
cc: Lenora Blauman
,
r`,
•
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 510 6 7
Lynn R a i n e y ,being first duly sworn on oath states
that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the
VALLEY DAILY NEWS
• Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition _
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers DETERMINATION REVIEW
COMMITTEE
are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six RENTON, WASHINGTON
months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published The Environmental Review Committee
in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-
Significance-Mitigated for the following pro
County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal ject(s) under the authority of the Renton
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Municipal Code.
King County. BLUME ECF SA-D12 IST89 BUTION FACILITY
The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition approval for a warehouse/office complex,
Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition (and not in including two structures, parking and ser-
vice areas, landscaping and recreational
supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers amenities.There is a wetland on the site—
during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Public Notice .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and
the remainder will be enhanced with native
vegetation. The 16 acre project site is
(Environmental Determination) R4023 vacant and is zoned for manufacturing park
use.The property is located at 601 Monster
Road.
was published on March 5 . 1990 This decision will be finalized in 15 days.
Written comments received after 5:00 p.m.,
March 20, 1990 will not be considered. A
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the fourteen (14)loday appealin periodo of will c-M.
g g g mence following the finalization DNS-M.
sum of$ 26 .60 _ irk. mitigation measures imposed by the
Cit.' of Renton's Environmental Review
Public Notice
d'a,101- Q Committee are available at the Cur cot
Planning Division of the Community Devel-
opment Department, Municipal Building
Renton, Washington 98055, Phone
Subscribed and sworn before me this 5 t h day of M a r c 119 9 0 235-2550.
Published in the Valley Daily News
March 5, 1990. R4023. Acct. #51067
Notary Public for the State of Washington
residing at Auburn,
King County, Washington
VDN#87 Revised 4/89
II
RIERS FRO ,PER DELIVERY TICKET
C 0 U* * * *
D ADDRESS/ACCOUNT N0.
AY
a ` Pc '
No.
Y Aa 774431
YOUR REFERENCE
SPECIFY LEVEL
HEAD OFFICE 601 3RD AVE. ,`!&»..,. /i,z,-( FLASH
SEATTLE, WA•623-7960 SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS PRINTED ON REVERSE ❑ 45 MINUTES
NAME COMPLETE BY HOT SHOT
TO. DATE TIME Q" 90 MINUTES
COMPANY/DEPARTMENT AM STANDARD
PM ❑ 3 HOURS
r
Y STREET-ADDRESS c ROUND TRIP 0 SAME DAY
In by 11
,; ❑ REQUIRED Del.by4:30
SUITE NO. CITY ZIP ROUND TRIP 1-1 OVERNIGHT
RECEIVED X ❑ 36 HOURS
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DECLARED VALUE BY COURIERS
❑ TONIGHT
I Do not Release I.D. DATE TIME
❑ Without Signature I 1 I I
PU #PCS I/O DEL. NOTES RECEIVED IN APPARENT GOOD ORDER BY DATE
X _
TACOMA 272-4477 EVERETT 259-0136 BELLEVUE 451-0336 OLYMPIA 754-6630
DELIVERY COPY
•
CONDITIONS .
1. THE CARRIER SHALL BE LIABLE ONLY FOR LOSS.DAMAGE OR INJURY TO THE I)rocgi.S cABRIED .
AND THEN ONLY TO THE EXTENT OF THE VALUE OF THOSE GOODS,WHICH VALU E IDMER
AGREES SHALL NOT EXCEED$2.00 PER POUND,AND NOT EXCEEDING $10.00VEti SHIPMENT,FOR
ALL GOODS CARRIED HEREBY,UNLESS A HIGHER VALUE IS DECLARED IN yeRRING EN THE SKIPPER.
2. IF THE SHIPPER DECLARES A VALUE GREATER THAN410.00 PER SHIPMENT. PREMIUM RATES
A" ;j SHALL BE CHARGED AS FOLLOWS:AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE OF FIFTY CENTS(50C)SHALL BE MADE
FOR EACH ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS($190.00)OR FRACTION THEREOF; OF THE DECLARED VALUE IN
EXCESS OF TEN DOLLARS($10.00).
3. CARRIER SHALL NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY VALUE OVER FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS
($5000.00) PER SHIPMENT, AND SHIPPER AGREES TO RELEASE THE VALUE OF FRF_JGHT SHIPPED,
EVEN IF A HIGHER VALUE IS DECLARED,AT NO MORE THAN FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5000.00) `
PER SHIPMENT.
4. NO LIABILITY FOR SUCH;ASS, DAMAGE OAR INJURY SHALL EXIST UNLESS THE SHIPPER OR ITS
ASSIGNEE GIVES NOTICE IN WRITING TO THE CARRIER WITHIN NINE(9)MONTHS OF SUCH EVENT.
5. UNLESS A VALUE IS DECLARED,OR,UNLESS 7013 NOT RELEASE WITHOUT SIGNATURE"HAS BEM
INDICATED ON THE SHIPPING DOCUMENT, SHIPPER SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE RELEASED DEL-
IVERY OF THE SHIPMENT,AND TO HAVE RELEASED CARRIER FROM ANY RESPONSIBILITY OR LIA-
BILITY FOR LOSS OR DAMAGE TO THE SHIPMENT.AS FOLLOWS:TO COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS,
BY DEPOSIT INTO A LOCKED AREA, BOX OR FACILITY; TO RESIDENCES, BY AFFIXING t.. A CON-
SPICUOUS PLACE PROTECTED FROM INCLEMENT WEATHER.
. 1
•
p e•
SHAPIRO&
ASS ZA SE _ .
Letter of Transmittal The Smith Tower
Suite 14400
506 Second Avenue
• PLANNING DIVISION Seattle
• 'CITY OF RENTON Washington 98104
Tel: 206/624.9190
Date �' �0 MAY 4 1990 Fax: 206/624.1901
Re 3e000 — A441140 RECEIVED
Orninewrioxi
To i,iG,.•4 AL,-!//of' /t/45 )z./'
cif' ®rC ,4 1i9rho
•
We are sending you t 24 eouAd4t
A4 / -
For your ,
Information Review Signature
Approval File XUse
Remarks ,ice )oeVA AA-00571
•
•
•
Signed ,ete 4f
white: to addressee yellow: to originator pink: to file
sTAPR
4 PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
yy 1889a
STATE OF WASHINGTON MAY 1 4 1990
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY RECEIVED
Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000
May 10, 1990
Mr. Don Erickson
City of Renton Planning
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Dear Mr. Erickson:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination
of nonsignificance for the construction of the Blume
Distribution Facility by Bruce Blume (file ECF-112-89) . We
reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following
comments.
1. It is not clear from the checklist how the wetland
boundaries were delineated. If it has not already been done,
a qualified consultant should be hired to delineate the
wetland boundaries using the new federal wetlands delineation
methodology. A report should be prepared that includes
information on the wetland functions and values provided by
the wetland and the potential impacts to these functions re-
sulting from the proposed project. Project design should
avoid or minimize impacts to the wetland where possible.
Proposed mitigation to compensate for unavoidable impacts
should be included in the wetland report. A copy of the
wetlands report should be sent to Ecology's Wetland Section
for review.
2 . A mitigation plan should be prepared which includes both
a construction plan and a detailed revegetation plan.
Ecology recommends using the following acreage replacement
ratios in determining minimum compensation for unavoidable
losses:
2 . 0: 1. 0 for Forested Wetlands
1. 5: 1. 0 for Scrub Shrub Wetlands
1. 25: 1. 0 for Emergent Wetlands
These ratios are to be used for calculating the area of
wetlands to be created. The area should be doubled for
enhancement of existing wetlands.
3 . Placement of any fill in wetlands may require a permit
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
4 . In order to protect the functions and values provided by
3
P"'
Letter to Don Erickson
May 10, 1990
Page 2
the wetlands on the site, a buffer of native vegetation sho-
uld be retained. The appropriate size of the buffer shouldbe
determined by the values provided by the wetland, the
topography, soils, existing vegetation, and the proposed
adjacent land use. Enhancement of an existing buffer, such
as planting vegetation or constructing a fence, can improve
the protection of wetland values. Our review of available
studies indicates that a minimum buffer of 50 feet is
required in most situations to provide adequate protection of
wetland functions and values.
5. Stormwater runoff contains many pollutants which have an
adverse impact on aquatic systems. Prior to discharge to a
water body, all runoff should be adequately treated. We
recommend the use of a detention basin and/or grass-lined
swales to filter runoff. Two hundred feet of grass-lined
swale with less than 5 percent slope has been proven
effective in removing particulates and hydrocarbon
pollutants. This type of biofiltration has been shown to be
more effective in improving water quality than most vault
oil/water separator systems.
If you have any questions, please call Mr. Bill Leonard of
our Wetlands Section at (206) 438-7161.
Sincerely,
Donald J. Bal s
Environmental Review Section
DJB:
cc: Bill Leonard, BH
I
/
1 1°'UCE
:! I E
&COMPANY REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS
PLANNING DIVISIt',..
CITY OF RENTON
May 9, 1990
MAY '1 4 1990
To: Lenora Blauman ra t Err, Ft r,f,,
From: Jim Garrison
RE: Public Hearing
Dear Lenora:
Pursuant to our phone conversation today, it is my
understanding you have received and/or distributed all
necessary information to the appropriate staff and that
nothing further is needed prior to the scheduled public
hearing May 15, 1990 at 9: 00 a.m.
I will be bringing with me:
1. Building rendering.
2 . Upland color landscaping plan.
3 . Wetland color landscaping plan (overlay) .
Should additional materials be needed or recommended, please
do not hesitate to contact me immediately. Dick Meyers of
Shapiro & Associates will be joining me as well.
Attached you will find a copy of a letter from Metro relative
to their comments on the DNS and following their review of
the design drawings. I believe all other comment letters and
the appeal from Audubon have been addressed and resolved.
Please advise me immediately of additional materials needed.
Si lice .ely.))
Pi y \' i1
les D. Garr on
cc: Bruce M. Blume
Sid Eland
pubhrng
146 NORTH CANAL STREET, SUITE 310 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98103 (206)632-1800 FAX (206)633-4680
MAY 78 '90 10:03 E,R&H 206 323 71'35.. P.2/2
7A4, `'
•
•
:13stn �J
May 2, 1990
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
• Bush, Roed and Hatchings, Inc.
2.009 Minor Avenue East MAY 1 4 1990
Seattle, Washington 9'6102
RECEIVED f•
Attention: Bob Roed
•
Dear
Dear i�•`:tr.. Roed:
TA; t,ribution• Facility for ttrue41_ >1une Co. •
municipality has reviewed the des .g•n. drawings .su
bmitted-tied, by
:yc..z office for the subject project. We offer these comments at
this time.
1. Pursuant to Metro's utility easement for the „,>,TS pipeline
or subject property, the property owner may utilize the
easement area to install the storm sewer and waterline_
However, in the event Metro must remove, replace, or
relocate the storm and water lines in order to maintain,
remove or replace the ETS pipeline, those costs pertainir
to the storm and waterlines must be borne by the owner of
the storm and waterlines.
The storm and waterlaz. :_ installed in the Metro utility
easement shall conform to the guidelines set by Lhe City of
Renton.
3 . The. ~q, 3A'i.ng's foundation footing shall_ be kept out of
Metro
4 . Please limit the use c heavy equipment over the ETS
pipeline.
5. Contact, the undersigned of Metro's Facilities Engineering
Division at 684-1291 a minimum of 72 hours prior to commen-
cing construction in order to allow-staff time to arrange
having a Metro inspector on site during construction.
t7er trul yours, •
, •
Richard H. Putney
Senior Facility Inspector
' RHP;ae _.__.....,... .� i
co: Matt Harris - 112
i r n
• brai ' ,:9'.'
BRUCE
BLUME 4.CI M
&COMPANY 11MAY
NORTH CANAL STREET, SUITE 310 Ni-/S 9 0
gurrTLE, WASHINGTON 98103
Lenora Blauman
City of Renton
200 Mill South
Renton, Wa. 98055
•
; I ; ; ,• 11 /1
!Oh:itiNhhiiid
CITY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 10, 1990
TO: File
FROM: Jerry Lind, Land Use Inspector/Landscape Planner
SUBJECT: Blume Distribution Facility-Wetlands Mitigation Plan
File No. ECF;SA-112-89
Wetland mitigation plans were submitted to the Planning Division on May 9, 1990, by Shapiro&Associates.
I have had the opportunity to review these landscaping plans. For the most part, the plantings chosen and
plant sizes selected are both appropriate for the site and will enhance the wetlands as requested by staff.
I would recommend, however, that the number of coniferous trees within the upland areas, particularly
along the east side facing Building "B", be increased in number to provide additional buffering and winter
color.
J FL:kac
cc: Lenora Blauman
/ ' 2 - K1
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
MAY 1 0 1990
etiECEIVED
PN!n L1J ( itq of Fenton f .02
? r
- —,r r��ws
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
MAY 1 0 1990
ECEIVED
((2' 57
R
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
MAY 1 0 1990
RECEWED
4 •
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
MAY 1 0 1990
RECEIVED
CU. IU LitL{ of Kenton r.143
•
MK
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
MAY 1 0 1990
kEDE1VED
111
111
. t t r•i !. r they
••tor
!•i‘. .
PLANNING DIVI
CITY OF RENTON
MAY 9 1990 RECEIVED
Hf ill c_i_l. IU l.itly of Kenton
.Vr L.
•
,
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
MAY 9 1990
RECEIVED
*LWTNO
II
SHAPIRO&
Letter ASSMATES2
L of Transmittal The Smith Tower
Suite 1400
506 Second Avenue
Seattle
Washington 98104
Tel: 206/624.9190
Date
Fax: 206/624.1901
Re UME - .R 1/,
./rR«TlnA/ ' /4/.
To ZRAI.A0p.04 444-0i /
•
G/, 4/
ZQ9 M'/GG / F 771
We are sending you + 4 G,6)/jA/, Q -
' aoy �Dl-�,Q . cD/VGAfr/ 4-z- M/717-og 1-?fro
For your
Information Review • Signature
' Approval File , Use
Remarks 19E VJ/a , V r
PLANNING DIVISION
MTV Or ncNn-o N1
•
MAY 01989
Signed ,1201 MV ,45 y � �W E
white: to addressee yellow: to originator - pink: to file
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
MAY 0 1990
CITY OF RENTON F;
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 4, 1990
TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner
FROM: Mike Dotson, Property Management
Randy Phelps, Survey
SUBJECT: BLUME DISTRIBUTION COMPANY SEGREGATION#112-89
We have reviewed the application for segregation submitted by Blume Distribution
Company. Our comments are as follows:
■ The legal descriptions of the four individual lots have been checked for accuracy.
Each of the legal descriptions is satisfactory.
■ The closure of the survey and the sufficiency of the recorded survey were found to be
in order.
m/blume/MDD/bh
•
OF RF
4 '1�
O
U 9 © Z
NOT ' E
9
40A4TEO SEP1s°
. City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner .
will hold a '
•
. PUBLIC.
HEARING ' .
• in
•CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL
MAY 15, 1990 9:00
ON ' BEGINNING AT A.M. P.M.
CONCERNING:
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
ECF-112-89;SA-112-89
The applicant seeks to obtain site. plan approval for a
warehouse/office complex, including. two structures, parking
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities.
There is a wetland on the site -- .99 acre portion is
proposed to be filled and the remainder will be enhanced
with native vegetation. The 16 acre project site is vacant
and is zoned for manufacturing park use.
J � o f '��' ~ `. ..E 7:_ rrVti ..�.
cols 14:*% ,^�� r/(/ �-' d �/ff
•
I! \• � . . - t .;/- om
, --: ,
Gc1C „”
I
L
i v -
1, • . ms .7'1 •.=,[ 0rrV sea s \ ri "'Pae ,
jj
. h\mil ��'•�'' •',7' � -11=. ~M
GENERAL
S _ • . tI,(l 7 ES
•
Property located on 601 Monster Road.
•
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL • THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT
PROPER AUTHORIZATION
•
CERTIFICATION
•
I , Vim-, S(�Velct. , —HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF .
THE ABOVE) DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS
PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 5- 5- 0 •
•
. O:T?ES Sis:,:scribed and sworn to before me, a
;;,ctar :,P+��rl-ice., in and for the State of Llashingtor�
n , on the 3 SIGNED : ��
v• R4C
( 0 )
SEP
City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner
will hold a
PUBLIC
HEARING :
in
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL
MAY 15, 1990 9:00
ON BEGINNING AT A.M. P.M.
CONCERNING:
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
ECF-112-89;SA-112-89
The applicant seeks to obtain site. plan approval for a
warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities.
There is a wetland on the site -- .99 acre portion is
proposed to be filled and the remainder will be enhanced
With native vegetation. The 16 acre project site "is vacant
and is zoned for manufacturing park use.
�J'#1. °�J �/i: n °v�r S.
/ •
•J' ''II - � _ — „ �-�
coo,, r.- : . ,J _ eo _
... ,, — ;,\. —-,///— Acilw.•
'�( \:=• \. '`ii'v Old' " ‹ •O.-:!-Q • "•j I
•. � . , • SIJ
! Goll COu.Se I L
Cl I Af•..7'i ( ': �.�/�oer1.� •�: ;i: Sc µTpr
•Imo• { 0•J I�,1y1. \\ ,1 `�' .,.X :.rtpos:l.." T
..I ../•�; IIf
) -,-`-.230 • % `w1. • • -r �1 r - . - :.
1,
1 . . „*. . •i ce
' . ,,, aJ ' ! ,— I\ yY . J. 1•I�1
.A GENERAL\, \ ea si.. . - -, ,, • k, g 0 PRESS_: .
Property located on 601 Monster Road.
•
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT
PROPER AUTHORIZATION
•
CERTIFICATION
I , •Mcirrj Sc\fir la. „, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF
•
THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS
PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON S- 3 - yCJ .
•
ATTEST: Su)scribed and sworn to before me, a
;ctry Plibl•iu, in and for the State of Washington • •
��residing in , on the 3 SIGNED : MaAi
day of _ 1 CM
�
� I
ENVIRONMENTAL
DECLARATION
ECF;SA 024-90
APPLICATION NO.
PROPOSED ACTION B & T Warehouse
Merritt Nielson
Applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval to construct a 22,438 square foot addition to an
existing 24,447 square foot warehouse building. •
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
•
846 Lind Avenue South vfu'S T
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED
PERSONS. OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE [ E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
I (DOES XIDOES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
I 'WILL HILL NOT
BE REQUIRED.
THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS
PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW.
•
COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY May 15, 1990
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P M.,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
CERTIFICATION
I , Mars .56\v�iej,, , - HE CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF
THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS
PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON ,>- 3 -
•
ATrEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary °ublic, and for/the State of Washington, _
residing i in‘
COMA/It, on the �'"ck
SIGNED : j�t
day ram_ 0 ✓ `�
Q
1 ' tbvY i,_
wF
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
MAY 1 1990
RECEIVED
LANCE MUELLER
ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECT! 12Qa6LEDIMOU
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122
DATE ✓V JOB NO.
(206) 325-2553 (FAX) 328-0554 ATTEN2/.
l .y-yw' (`\ ///r
��m� t��A''�f'/ I� V
TO ! © V
, /seA7 S V1
/AJA-- -75‘
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: Or-RE oN
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications Q '99n
❑ Copy of letter El Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
/74-e pL,tiAts
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted El Resubmit __.copies for approval
For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
s requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
.6" ° 1-)17fr.±t-
/ybi)
COPY TO
SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us once.
il 7"41111r(r
. . ,
•
• 1.•• ..
- • :--.,_
HI L ' 1E
,-..( '<Y. _ —.- — ----. „— — — — Ri;Ai ys i A i.l.Di .I.,,q I ii.s
7_A_CS,I,)1ILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET
.._
-
,.. _
DATE:
_. .
t.A•• 2 . - 5 / $ 1
DRUCE ELME 4 COMPANY ,
8 : 4.206) 6.3.„: —4680
z ,
• ' ' 7F PAGES TRANSMITTED c ..
(INCLUDES COVER
-..,
...
. .,
. _
.,.
---1-- ..
',.
;•
. . ,
s
I
,
'.- U. ,'1 KEET. SUITE 310 SEATTLE WAstuNGToN 98103 (20)02-1800 I 0:AX (: .9 ,3•46so
---
15:21 FROM BRUCE BLUME AND CO. TO 2352516 1-'.162
A
P11 I:ST,\TT ;)T'vi"1 r�YT i S
April 19, 1990
To: Lenora Blauman
From: Jim Garrison
RE: Wetlands landscaping.
Dear Mr:. Blauman:
Following our phone conversation today, I contacted Shapiro &
Associates for an update to the wetland landscaping plan.
Unfortunately, both Mark Boule and Dick Myers were out. It
is, however, my understanding that they are nearing
completion of the plan based upon their tour of the site with
Mr. Adams and we will all have the opportunity to review that
plan by Early next week. Mark has also brought to my
attention an area near an existing drain pipe which may need
further study relative to the wetlands landscaping and/or
biofiltration. He is looking into this concurrent with the
landscaping plan.
While we anticipate the above will not represent any
significant disagreements, we should schedule to collectively
review the plans at the earliest opportunity next week.
I will pursue Mark and Dick regarding completion of their
plans an quickly as possible.
Thank you.
since ely,kAvi
J D. Garrison
cc. Mark Boule
Bruce M. Blume
•
146 Norm "i :C')T1 (20()632-ISOO FAX ;706)1,3
TOTAL P.02
?AREA -r: .,.''•
•
°'•: ' DECASHIELD® II LUMINAIRE •
APPLICATIONS
Parking areas,driveways,walkways,malls and -........„
roadways •
SPECIFICATION FEATURES
❑Heavy-gauge formed aluminum housing
❑Separate swing-down optical and ballast door access
❑ALGLAS® finish on reflector \�' J/////
❑Heat and impact resistant tempered flat glass lens � �%/(� .....,.
❑Decorative mounting arm standard
❑Mogul base socket _ ,
MOST FREQUENTLY ORDERED
r, V•
Light `'` S rsi
Wattage Source Voltage Ordering Number '�� (�L
•
D25S _
' 100 HPS Multivolt D25SIOSOH2GMC3DB •
150(55V) HPS Multivolt D25S15SOH2GMC3DB ; ,.; r\ .
250 HPS Multivolt D25S25SOA2GMC3DB C! ' - 3 r
250 HPS 120 D25S25S1A2GMC3DB "''`''' -' =.i (3;)
D4OS ^
8 199v „ID'
,I '
250 HPS Multivolt D40S25SOA1GMC4DB !T: • ��';:. APR �.. n ;.,
i 1(
250 FPS - 120 D40S25S1A1GMC4DB I' 1! • �;., r� p `<�n, r; I
400 HPS Multivolt D40S4OSOAIGMC4DB L I l� b s :II .U ' r' -L.,'_ -
400 HPS_ Multivolt D40S40SOA2GMC4DB
400 .HPS 120 D40S4OSIA2GMC4DB
400 MH Multivolt D40S40MOAIGSC2DB _
fe
ORDERING NU,; - v_ LISTED
D25S 15 S 0 H 1 G M C 3 DB. F
--T- T T T T T T TTT —T—
IES
PRODUCT LIGHT BALLAST PE LENS DISTRIBUTION
ID WATTAGE SOURCE VOLTAGE TYPE FUNCTION TYPE TYPE COLOR OPTIONS
)0XX XX X X X X X X X X XX XXX
D25S= 07=70 S =HPS 0=12012081 S€e Ballast 1=None G=Glass I I I DB=Dark F =Fusing(Not .
Decashield 10=100 M=MH 2401277 and Photo- 2=PER I I I Bronze available
250 Luminaire 15=150 Standard: Multivolt metric Selec- Recep• with
(250W maxi ( � Lampnot 1=120 tion Table tacle See Ballast and multivolt)
mum) A=Autore Photometric
Mount-
D4OS 17=175 included. 2=208 g Selection Table R=No Mount
Decashield 25=250 3=240 H =HPF Reac- 4=PER
I I ing Arm
for or Lag Recep- (See Acces-
400 Luminaire 24=2501 4=277 M=Mag•Reg facie I soriesfor
400 5=480 and mounting)
' 40=400 shorting . S =Short I - -
NOTE:2501 NOTp M=Medium II
•
connected Receptacles `�' PLANNING DIVISION
for 250 watt connected C=Cutoff CITY OF RENTON •-
same volt- I
age as unit
except as 2=Type II APR 19 1990
•
noted.Order
• PE Control 3=Type III ,
Separately. 4=Type IV •11� mo11 -t; Zi I ,.�.
Data subject to change without notice
©The catalog numbers.optlone,and 186 -
L modifications shown on thin page are UL V
listed unless otherwise noted
•Reglstered Trademark of General Electric Company
IMEMEMIFE - � `` - 'AREA
GUIDE:FORM SPECIFICATIONS -
'DECASHIELD° II LUMINAIRE- .
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The luminaire designated (identify)shall be a GE DECASHIELD®II
floodlight,ordering number (specify D25SXX)W000UWUU(or
, D4OS ), or approved equal, to operate one
(specify(70, 100, 150 (55V) or 250) watt high pressure sodium 1111111111
(HPS)or(175 or 250)watt metal halide for D25S or(250,250/400 or
400)watt HPS or 400 watt metal halide for D40S)lamp from a nominal
(specify 120, 208, 240, 277 or 480)volt, 60 Hertz power
source and shall be capable of starting and operating the specified lamp within the limits specified by the lamp.manufacturer.The
luminaire shall contain a completely prewired integral ballast and an
optical assembly that shall provide an IES Distribution Type
(specify MC3,MC4 or SC2 according to photometric selection table).
The luminaire shall be UL Listed for Wet Locations. •
MECHANICAL CONSTRUCTION . OPTICAL ASSEMBLY
•
The luminaire shall be supplied as components—ballast,optical and The cutoff optical assembly shall include a die-cast aluminum door
mounting.The luminaire shall include a formed aluminum housing and frame,formed aluminum reflector with a chemically bonded lightweight
standard decorative mounting arm (both with a dark bronze paint non-breakable glass ALGLAS®finish on all surfaces and heat/impact-
finish)for mounting on square poles,a swing down gasketed optical resistant tempered flat glass lens.The optical assembly shall contain a
and ballast door access with captive corrosion resistant screws(and ,._ _heavy-duty mogul base socket with split shell tempered brass lamp
• optional prewired photoelectric control receptacle). grips and a free-floating,spring-loaded center contact.
BALLAST OPERATION
•'REFER TO PRODUCT PAGE FOR BALLAST AVAILABILITY.FOR MORE DEFINITIVE
The luminaire shall have a (specify)ballast'with an electrical SECTIONATION,REFER TO BALLAST SPECIFICATIONS IN TECHNICAL DATA
quick disconnect. The plug-in type starting aid (for HPS only) and
ballast shall be prewired to the lamp socket requiring connection of
power supply leads only,,The ballast shall be in full compliance with •
lamp-ballast specifications available to the fixture manufacturer from
the lamp manufacturers at the time of fixture manufacture. -.!
The ballast shall reliably start and operate the lamp in ambient tempera- +
tures down to-20°F for metal halide and-40°F for HPS. APR . S .1990 ,1
The luminaire and ballast shall be from the same manufacturer. •
I`
1 LrJ lh Il
•
Data subject to change w;Mout nonce gfs�861188
•Registered Trademark of General Electric Company .'
WALKWAY BOLLARD LUMINAIRE
rI APR
I
APPLICATIONS � , '�� l� �l 1`� I` �"'
Walkways,recreation areas,plazas,pedestrian - -.wes T
malls
SPECIFICATION FEATURES .
❑Uniform effective cutoff lighting ' I I
❑Spun aluminum Alzakt finish on reflectorik 1
❑Extruded aluminum square or round housing
I
❑Medium base socket
MOST FREQUENTLY ORDERED
' Light
Waffage Source Voltage Ordering Numbers
100 HPS Multivolt WB6R10SOH1ASC5DB
100 HPS 120 WB6R10SIH1ASC5DB
100 MH 120 WB6R10M1N1ASC5DB
r. it
/ ,/'
.
.
E
'
4.
- IG, NUMBER LOGIC Q LISTED '
WE • . . 1 A SC5 DB F
. T T -m- T
IES
PRODUCT LIGHT BALLAST PE DISTRIBUTION
ID WATTAGE SOURCE VOLTAGE TYPE FUNCTION LENS TYPE TYPE COLOR OPTIONS
XXXX XX X X X X X X X X XX XXX
WB6R= 03=35 S =HPS 0=12012081 See Ballast 1=None A=Acrylic I I I DB=Dark F=Fusing(Not
6-In!Round 05=50 M=MH 2401277 and 3=Internal I I I Bronze available
Bollard 07=70 Standard: Multivolt Photometric pE See Ballast and with
WBBR= 1=120 Selection (Connected multivolt)
8.625 In.Round 10=100 Lamp not Table same Photometric
Bollard 15=150 included. 2=208 H =HPF voltage as $election Table
WB6S= (55V) 3=240 Reactor unit except I I I
• 6-lit Square NOTE:150W 4=277 or Lag as noted.) 4 I I
Bollard Is available 5=480 N =NPF S=Short I I
WBBS= in WB8R and Reactor --
8-In.Square WB8S only. _ or Lag 1 .I _
Bollard
C=Cut-off I
Data suD/ect to change without notice 5=Type V .
���ma catalog numbers,options,and
'Ip modiftcatlons shown on this page are ETL 174
������iii666,listed unless otherwise noted.
1Proprietary term of Aluminum Company of America -
wtllima
:GUIDE FORM SPECIFICATIONS
°•).--.WALKWAY BOLLARD . .
' GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The complete ground-mounted luminaire designated (identify)
shall be a GE WALKWAY BOLLARD luminaire,ordering number
(specify WB6R)000000000000c WB8R>C00000000000(
or WB8SXX)WUUW0000(), or approved equal, to operate one
(specify(35,50,70 or 100)watt high pressure sodium(HPS)or 100
watt metal halide for(WB6R and WB6S))or (specify(35,50,70,
100 or 150(55V))watt HPS or 100 watt metal halide for(WB8R and
WB8S))medium base lamp from a nominal (specify 120,208,
240, 277 or 480) volt, 60 Hertz power source. The luminaire shall
include a completely prewired integral ballast and an optical assembly
that shall provide an IES Distribution Type SC5.The luminaire shall be ETL
Listed for Wet Locations.
MECHANICAL CONSTRUCTION
The extruded aluminum outer housing shall be (specify round or OPTICAL ASSEMBLY
square) and have a dark bronze finish. It shall house all electrical The optical assembly shall have a formed aluminum reflector with a
components and optical assembly.The luminaire shall be suitable for spun-aluminum Alzakt finish and acrylic lens and shall supply uniform
ground mounting. (There shall be an optional factory-installed internal . effective cutoff lighting.The gasketed lens prevents insect and water entry.
photoelectric control.)
BALLAST OPERATION •REFER TO PRODUCT PAGE FOR BALLAST AVAILABILITY.FOR MORE DEFINITIVE
INFORMATION,REFER TO BALLAST SPECIFICATIONS IN TECHNICAL DATA SECTION.
The luminaire shall have a (specify)ballast'.The starting aid(for
HPS only)and ballast shall be prewired to the lamp socket requiring
connection of power supply leads only. The ballast shall be in full
compliance with lamp-ballast specifications available to the fixture .
manufacturer from the lamp manufacturers at the time of fixture
manufacture.
The ballast shall reliably start and operate the lamp in ambient tempera •
-
tures down to-20°F for metal halide and-40°F for HPS. •
. .
j
. _ APR990 ,U
t .
•
i
I`' ';
RECEIVED
APR 12 1990
LANCE MUD1 ER & ASSOC.
Data subject b Change w,7aul aches ' - .
t Proprietary term of Aluminum Company of Americo gfs1741188
41
$01k CITY OF RENTON
"LL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division
May 1, 1990
James Garrison
Bruce Blume & Company
146 N Canal
Seattle, WA 98103
RE: Blume Distribution Company, 601 Monster Rd SW
ECF;SA-112-89
Dear Mr. Garrison:
The date of Tuesday, May 15, 1'990 at 9:00 a.m. has been set for the site plan review hearing of
the above referenced matter. The hearing will be held in the Council Chambers on the second
floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington.
The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public
hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any
questions, please call 235-2550.
Sincerely,
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Chief, Current Planning
DKE:kac
Paul Leland
cc: J. Kohlsaat METRO
12057 SE 42nd St 821 - 2nd Ave, M/S 92
Bellevue, WA 98006 Seattle, WA 98104
James Lutz, P.E. Sid W. Eland, Jr.
WSDOT, District 1 Sid Eland, Inc.
15325 SE 30th P1 PO Box 80187
Bellevue, WA 98007 Seattle, WA 98108
Tony Opperman Roger A. Grove
Dept. of Wildlife Sid Eland, Inc.
16018. Mill Creek Blvd PO Box 80187
Mill Creek, WA. 98012 Seattle, WA 98108
Gerry Adams Don Marcy
Seattle Audubon Society 777 - 108th Ave NE, #1500
28803 NE Big Rock Rd Bellevue, WA 98004
Duvall, WA 98019-6414
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the
Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on May 15, 1990 at
9:00 a.m. to consider the following petitions:
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
ECF-112-89;SA-112-89
The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a warehouse/office complex,
including two structures, parking and service areas, landscaping and recreational
amenities. There is a wetland on the site -- .99 acre portion is proposed to be
filled and the remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre
project site is vacant and is zoned for manufacturing park use. The property is
located at 601 Monster Road.
Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development
Department.
All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the Public Hearing on May
15, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. to express their opinions.
Published: May 4, 1990
Account No. 51067
I OF R4,
A
A.
d © Z Ni C3 Ti ICE
k-
• 090.o co
• 9gTFU SEPS �O�P '
• City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner
will hold a
HEARING
. puB. I. I e
in
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL
MAY 15, 1990 9 : 00
•
ON BEGINNING AT A.M. P.M.
CONCERNING:
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
ECF-112-89 ;SA-112-89
The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a
warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking
and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities .
There is a wetland on the site -- . 99 acre portion is •
proposed to be filled and the remainder will be enhanced
with native vegetation. The 16 acre project site is vacant
and is zoned for manufacturing park use.
•,`r- . X4 VoV° c�J��I ~ J'T. `•. \
�J
..e. . _ .
r•
osier •12 *I 744.i •.''
V A 5 .__ i►
, .
; • /7`.; ' : . ` vq�\ s ue ,
,
( c \• \ Z 0�0 ,- R �� •Ii I . ___ �, •`
•
:.
r t,. 1 - •cou Coarse 1Nift
7.0i
1: ••i .11•il:; .'\I (.. •f 30.A>• r r*1 r_'Sewage •,,\ �_
•
r', \ \, 23 II• ®i . . .\\ ,y 24.. i 1 k
• 1 %)ik."."----Ls.- ....----.. . •II.s:_t.,.. :ilf ..Iri ' '7-7• .,71. , :,.- ,....7.u......:12.1.,A .
yy .' 'I • Rp( t,r
�.71--I.".. r -j. _ I•Ira' :,...,•: :L- I
GENE _ +: •• ���. �‘ �� ^1 .- • • RESS•
•;/-
GENERAL _ —
Property located on 601 Monster Road.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT. TO. BE REMOVED WITHOUT
PROPER AUTHORIZATION •
J—
.9 STATg o.o 4192
1
CURT SMITCH fie
•
Director �'yy 1889!1°yam TM
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE
16018 Mill Creek Blvd.. Mill Creek, WA 98012 Tel. (206) 775-1311
May 2, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
Don Erickson, Environmental Review Committee MAY 3 '1990
Current Planning Division RECEIVED
Community Development Department
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
RE: ECF-112-89; BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY; MDNS
Dear Mr. Erickson:
The Department of Wildlife received the conceptual wetland mitigation
plan for the Blume Distribution Facility prepared by Shapiro and
Associates. The plan appears to address our major concerns for the
loss of wetlands and wildlife habitat. Our remaining concerns are for
maintaining good water quality in the wetland and that wildlife will
continue to use this area.
To maintain water quality in the wetlands, street and parking area
runoff should flow through oil/water separators or retention/detention
ponds before flowing through the grass-lined swales to the wetlands.
Wetland construction and revegetation should be monitored and
contingency plans followed to assure success of the project.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project.
Sincerely,
el;;;-- 0
To Opp r ann
Habitat Biologist
TO:kh
c: Habitat, Olympia
a 3
1r',%4
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
MAY 31990
RECEWED
I]. TU r_itn o+ F'Frit.on U,72
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
MAY 2 1990
HECEWED
b
Pent n F.
~,5
•, , .1N A:o;,,,•.;•-•.,,:-,?
APR-30-1990 16:01 FROM BRUCE BLLIME AND CO. TO [19] 'City of Renton P.01
BRUCE
BLUME
&COMPANY IWAt, i>PATA.(>I'r:lZti
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
GS.XM LE TRANSMITTAL SHEET
MAY A '1990
RECRVED
TO: Ler1C7 . -51 cu Lirrk AA - DATE: `7�'
FAX #«
FROM: 3 Yv'
BRUCE BLUME & COMPANY
FAX #: {206.I_633-468O
I
NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED (INCLUDES COVER SHEET)
MESSAGE: ..
. .. _� �.•�-� �� L� ��,�� � -I '-- £ .J•I rim) L.U. IU k-ity Ot <e ltcr I-.L1c
BRUCE
; LUME
&COMPANY -- REAL ESTATE DEVEI..QI'1?IL8
April 30, 1990
Mr. Gerry Adams
28803 N.E. Big Rock Road
Duvall, Wa. 98019
Dear Mr. Adams:
With respect to our telephone conversation this morning and
your meeting with Dick Meyer of Shapiro & Assoc. last week,
this letter is provided as an outline of our agreement in
principal to designate the area for wetland improvement as
defined in the Shapiro & Associates drawing dated 4-27-90.
This area shall be designated as wetlands in perpetuity and
shall be so reflected in the title.
As Z indicated today, we will be able to place such a
covenant against the property by approximately May 31, .1990.
Meanwhile, we will request our attorney to draft the
appropriate verbage reflecting this intention.
With your receipt of this letter, you will immediately
proceed to remove your appeal. In that our project is
scheduled for public hearing May 15, 1990 and the City of
Renton requires ten (10) days public notice, your appeal will
need to be removed by no later than May 3, 1990.
I believe this letter should reflect our intention and
understanding. If you find I have misstated anything, please
do not hesitate to contact me as soon as possible.
Thank you.
Ver truly yours,
21-)L.
Jim Garrison
cc: Bruce Blume
Lenora Blauman
Dick Meyers
146 NORTH.CANAL STREET, SUITE 310 SEATTLE, WAS F-3[N(.,!'ON 981Q3 (206) 32-1800 FAX (2O6)6 3-4(,8O
. . .
.•
, . . . .
• ,.,,
r 1
.4.
T.;.: I!..r•3:' !. :4 ..':"i''''':, .. . • , :: '4--
.. ' j, ' 4 • . ' ' I . ' ' .'4. '., .1.:. 4 . .' • :' .;.,},;:
"0. .I.;4'1•rf I',19'irr','.;I r !'' ,rrri•.Ir!;
. r ! I r,7 1-,, j ':, ! ,.• .'-''. ' . ' '' ..'.!.,,--4--- '4-4
I , :
,.4 : r.i,.•,'f',;:.:.-'..:5, .,"1 '', .''•:?.--:0,IL' .!, 1 i '''i•h!'!'•'' : •j ' '' ''' '''. . ...;, .? ' ' ,,' ;0,!.•i4.•it,,ii.„,,q,H,,..:,; .t.„,.4.1. ....•4, i,..•
, , '.i. : . •." 'i, ., ' ,••• • •, • ' . ' • •••,,,,..'•-0;.•••.1,;.,' „..• .. •4..,,-1-4-'1,:1', .• i i', :. .,1."'
j • :: ' ' 1. ' .1;;I).. AAAthipu_i ''';:J j.:-',:t•:'.
• ; ,'1 ` . . `:'.. ,':1,.9;71'-. '4ti 51/1,,,-7::7-7- ---•t"7"-"
• 1 •. , . • .-,1,•,.i..-.,,,,',.• „.'PP ilp,.'ISMV,!..''! ' ,. r '
— --4- .
".i' . • n'' ',': .r' •-" 1." ,:ci:,"
i. 1Q6- L-...- x4 0-k ut
• . . — ' ___&.•-• •• : 4-7,Y0, , . „..
0
I '
11 f ' ' "; 1 .'i '. . .-' ' '4, : ' 1i.'Lr''Ii.1.. itz.,v 1,. .: .,;.'... ,I,,:.:', .• ',,,„
, ,.. ' „ . . ,-:.,: . ., :'• •:.
r•-• ;! . • .
It t L L AU LTkL .F -- 6.-(..L-1--142 ;. ' ''• - '•., • : .• •k•1••.'I!,,,'•' ••. ,. 1••.•,,,,;11.-oir.',1- '• •?.i..'•
• .. .1,. !, ,..,.: 1•.•,, - •• ,•.:,,H ,, ,:"
. 7 • , : . -1---F . ,.• ; , .. . . -"''t;t74,:t7.77‘777.-'."--- - --., -÷.,
,
:4' ' • ' i,'•;',,'•'.1'h:',,:.'',,:•''•'$•: ,i'::iki;: .•,:'.' :1 f ':: I. ':1::
. K a--i\J-\--0 if .) ,-- •••••*!, :..- •'.:'. .. .. '1:' ,;.,:,,i,,,,,,,r . : ...;,.'.1' 4.. '4', ' ' :i r'4'r
/ 1 ,106--TD.' ,,j ,j., ___,T(3,0, _,,„ • , i' • ' ,' •' .... ;:- ;::.':'•i0•;!'',1:". • i '1;`'.e:,.;,i';';:..:,; ', . I'L...._
/•,'
:.: • • ,. .•, :'.r :.•,,11;?:ii. , ..1ti' '•-•''.I'i--''"':.-l'i:i'':'.-7''i7i.::-•7-4'I'7'''''P,7r,•.I-'I-'-I"17. '--',''''.1:-,:-',1.01-1,:74: 4
':1;•il'II•;:lii.V1,`:'
'` 1 : • i ,., ,11,,.:,1„ii r•,•.I.:,:,``'-:,'; ,%1 ,, • I •"!-i t rf-
I •ri:
B LcA. rk-A- b.- c S---R-( k c-L 0 . " . _. '• - ___.•____S_ ..E.8", f,P6/')--<-,,-;-'''''
0 .....6.,. .T.1 ..f. ...)._._.., Ce--/ i (,:e
., :,.'•,.„ ','': :'...'i'i', . : ' •i7.1: :7!': i',''.:. ,i:•:,..''. .:.::: 1 .1 .1',-.Vk-11•.:' I]) :1,!''II:i'l '
' .•ii. 11•:.%.) ',.i :5.'i i. •H . :. : ::• : '' it:. .; 1.•;:til i1„',j.i.1!:.-,..i:g.,1:!•':;1,4Wt:,' I?.i..1•• il,.. ':
1 I.' ' :t..' ' ' . ! :;'':,It, .l '. ' '1!:4ii P;!' .';'' ilt'!q'li;4., '::.• :,'''i' .!%'-?Illp'It! ;!'1,.i Y,!'d
1 I .7.... .
4 := , ;l,
. ! '• 4 ''' 4'i'',..1.'''';.''''.'..', '' j' '01'';','-'Y : , 'r : :b 67)-P 114 tZ - (-•4- LA- P.-itnkci A, ,
..._
, .•..,.:•• 4-TV.:1'4, :' .' '-7:-.!'-' -':7'''--7—777-
1 ,
,. ':'II,1::"I.ii,,:.',,-.I'l I: • ,,:,., ''•1:`. :!. . .:.
.: :...,;:,1:: i;' !::''•'•ii I.1 ,:' , I ....
... .
. '. ,' ',--:t:''AT:t , ---'•.f-,-- ---.7.-....i-.-,...,-.7.:._,:.....
. , .
I ( A C-° `l ) S t -D e: R A -t `.L
' 6
,,., ,.,,,....,...•
. 1- R.. ck c. ---- 6 La ,,,,,E-_ • sz- (;01 ‘./\ ptri-i .)y TO
: o F- Ti. . C: ' PR.0 P 0 S
,, • . .r.,
. PIL D ,1 6-- C-T S ( TE lA tu 0 6- R__ F f . 0-A.IA-iu b.---(QT- ", ',. :. ' • .
. •
h., •;,•' . ..• ,.
Co J e7.,A).4p1 k,)-1- ' ! i)-k, b To 'i:LA- g (.D.-&-T,i•..". . •. •
•
: . J ., . . \ .„ ,,.:,...i,,,,,‘, ., , , i ,,i,.,, ;; 1 ri !:,.- :;• .A ( L)E T- (---riJD :' ,v-A l•TI
. .
6, il-Tt 0(N.) PR.6,1167-c-777.•.f . -,'.' !.
. ; • :• •,, b -- VEL-0Pc-Q, , : A i'i . . . A,ok):O.!'Uri.6,,6.,,,R.„6--!6--,,,t):11,..... .Trpi.ipillio.!leig6iLitrIll”,•T,I.',11!:'1:,'. i' ' . ' : ':'—' ir' "T••T'''I ...„••••••:,•'•Ii•I 'lli)j,:]),.."."'.'-• ri.•,i l';.>;; ' ;!, ,;','''.!'i V"'S _..., ....
St- 09---T-T-Lc-_-,- (A.,z) (.4.-/S.g. i•L).".'.• S'o C.( --7- 7-.Y.•': ..! It
• ______________
••,;,,, ;,, ....
' L •!-"., ;,, ,,,.,. ., . ,,..:,J.,; , : •
AIL 27,, / ct ? o 2, t----- w .(-THDR, i\, 'H ' • . •
. . .. • ..... :.........., ___.. ___._ .„
. ., .,.,..,,.• i
,, . .
. „
. ,
, .
, I
_.•.- - - - -. ........ e TE-
..
PI P
. . .
0 (A- ft. -t-f} F F /4-.P-u E • 0 / -) T 41- t S . .. . I/A-A-Tr-re-2 .: , .
•
:FoG- __ A r-D`f : . ) k) (--v KNUE- tOtElUGE.• ,
) A-L S(:) h_ po L.bcs,_k-a•_(,..--,- co 4r- _ ,_Th-J(i-GS '': 4.,ANt ti,-)iz- 7t--,te7.-N
,.
-
\A \ c, ek
„ i ( i , ,.:,„, .,., : ,••q ' . " , 1'.'. : „',
A ltdN, ' , 5 cA.,13 otA. t -V-177( k5 G. '•':„et s: . :.'fi
..71
•
I,
1 •
, .
............, ... .. ._ . _ .. .. . . _. . ... .
i-.- ... ..
i
_
L '
I ,
_...-_....-...._...__ __._i_-____. ..- .... ... _
,.
r.
.7
�9Zb � � .o�-�
i
©gib no el-1 ti n-c
8
•
Z� t,--5Ps N (2-0 r) Ova --1 1- L H ��
N01L-fci- -?-c5 cvv--)
- ' -sav) Vat/ CI-1 ti-R,LD. -p ,..
..,... _ _. , .
.5 .. .
• ( „..,
. ,
•
. -
1
#0..1",-;* -�03 WESTERN AVENUE
WATERFRONT REPROGRAPHICSSEATTLE, WA 98104
(1)
(206)467-9889
�O' ���U DATE •
/ °
7,66
GRS9
I L
Z___....—//i774 D
CITY •OF AFA/TO�
_
• E Do /Y7/LGS 4v5- S-
a • a AeA2ToN
ORDERED BY
� ORDER� / „ _ SHIPPED_ VI�4F DUE Q
`'/}• /J'/�(/� DESCRIPTION `J//`/% l/J/
. ppliA1-5 .
. (J u 4
FLANN9J i3 DWISION
f 1
�IGay OF FIENTON 13���E 1;' a pV n 1 1990 -_ ii
1 NO.OF PACKAGES MAXI V hD RECEIVED
i
COMPLETE ORDER PARTIAL ORDER n
i lu
ORIGINALS ENCLOSED YES El NO
i
LANCE MUELLER ;
ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECT: L[ V4[ . SF TiRikR9SETTITAL
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122
DATE JOB NO.
(206) 325-2553 (FAX) 328-0554 ATTENTIO r ' ��
6140 gA / 1"174 Li"4 AA
TO 4iA RE:6 0 RoGe 15L4314/0/StTJ aL./AKD
, elo,T7.1 .)5 i3:1,...±41_A:);:t_FT, 12-6 Q17)t .J
i -wcr 16/
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
—
❑ Shop drawings X3rints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples 0 Specifications
❑ Copy of letter Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
- tL hgL-c.. ,
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
1t: For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit - copies for distribution
47 As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ or review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
ortO Fly
Y��5y�.s '19g� �a ;�... - ... ,) j,
Vki
COPY TOE V C}
SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted. kindly notify us at once.
CITY JF RENTON
Community Development Department
Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg,Director
April 24, 1990
Washington State
Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
Mail Stop PV-11
Olympia, WA 98504
Re: Environmental Determinations
Transmitted herewith are copies of Revised Environmental Determinations and Environment-al
Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on April 11,
1990:
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
The comment period has ended. No further comments are being received. The 14 day appeal
period started April 16, 1990 and will end April 30, 1990 at 5:00 p.m.
If you have questions, please call Lenora Blauman or me at 235-2550.
Sincerely,
Oiti)(
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Chief, Current Planning,
DKE:kac
cc: Mr. Craig Larson, King County Planning Division
Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro
Department of Wildlife
Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries
Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation
Ms. Connie Corpuz, City of Seattle
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055
•
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-112-89
' APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-112-89 .
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME
PROJECT NAME: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex,
including two structures, parking and
service areas, landscaping and recreational
amenities. There is a wetland on the site
-- . 99 acre portion is proposed to be
filled and the remainder will be enhanced
with native vegetation. The 16 acre
project site is vacant and is zoned for
manufacturing park use.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 601 Monster Road
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Community Development Department
Current Planning Division
The Environmental Review Committee, on April 11, 1990, reviewed the revised
application for the. above referenced project. Based upon their review of
the submitted comments and staff input, the Committee reaffirmed their
decision to issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated. As a
result of their review, the Committee did retain Conditions #1 through #8
of the Determination and added four new conditions. The additional
conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review
Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code
(see attached sheet) . Existing and added conditions are necessary to
mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review
process.
This Determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing
Examiner no later than 5: 00 p.m. on April 30, 1990 . Any appeal of this
decision must state clearly in writing why the Determination should be
revised. and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee.
Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee
c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
Current Planning Division
Community Development Department
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
PUBLICATION DATE: April 16 1990
DATE OF DECISION: April 11, 1990
SIGNATU7S:
////���f?-(! ��C7//� (t-�-2
Kenneth E. Ny-seri
Communit uevetopment Department
\•- ----\"---'
Lynn( . . Gtiitmann, Director
Public Works Department
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
MITIGATION MEASURES
PROJECT: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-112-89
APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-112-89
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan
approval for a warehouse/office complex,
including two structures, parking and
service areas, landscaping and recreational
amenities. There is a' wetland on the site
-- . 99 acre portion is proposed to be
filled and the remainder will be enhanced
with native vegetation. The 16 acre
project site is vacant and is zoned for
manufacturing park use.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 601 Monster
Road.
RECOMMENDATIONS: On April 11, 1990, the Environmental Review
Committee issued a Revised Determination of
Non-Significance-Mitigated to include each
of the eight (8) conditions attached, plus
four (4) new conditions as follows:
9) That the applicant provide $4 , 000. 00 as
a fair share payment toward the Washington
State Department of Transportation project
for the signalization of the (SR 900)
Martin Luther King Way/68th Avenue South
intersection, subject to the approval of
the City of Renton Public Works Department
and the King County Public Works
Department.
10) That the applicant provide in-kind
replacement (and enhancement) of wetlands
to compensate for the . 99 acre of emergent
wetland which is to be filled.
Replaced/enhanced wetland shall be between
. 55 acre and . 99 acre and is to be
connected to existing wetland areas located
on the northwest portion of now-defined
Parcel #4 . Wetland replacement/enhancement
plans are subject to approval by the City's
Landscape Planner and concurrence, of the
State Department of Wildlife;
replacement/enhancement shall be achieved
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy.
11) That the applicant allow an annual
inspection by the City of each and all of
the wetlands areas on now-defined Parcel #2
and now defined Parcel #4 of the subject
property, to ensure that these areas are
being properly protected and maintained,
with inspection rights to be provided
through an easement to allow access to the
site and a covenant to ensure that the
easement runs with the land, to be valid
for the life of the project. These
documents are to be approved by the City
Attorney and provided prior to the public
hearing for site plan approval .
12) That the applicant, prior to public
hearing for site plan approval, in order to
ensure protection of the effluent transfer
system, obtain from METRO approval of
construction plans and provide an easement
and covenant to run with the land for METRO
access to maintain and repair the sewer
line, subject to approval by METRO and the
Renton City Attorney.
•
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
MITIGATION MEASURES
PROJECT: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
PROPONENT: BRUCE BLUME
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-112-89
APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-112-89
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a
warehouse/office complex, including two structures,
parking and service areas, landscaping and recreational
amenities. There is a wetland on the site -- .99 acre
portion is proposed to be filled and the remainder will
be enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre
project site is vacant and is zoned for manufacturing
park use.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 601 Monster Road.
RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a
Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with
the following conditions:
Natural Environment: 1) That the applicant provide a revised wetland
landscaping plan, to include a greater number, size and
diversity of native wetland plants, subject to approval
by the City, by the Department of Ecology and by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in advance of site plan
review.
Earth: 2) That the applicant provide a statement agreeing to
limit filling operations on the site to a maximum of .99
acres of the wetland and an approved amount of
dryland fill, using fill material approved by the City, as
well as fill methods/monitoring systems approved by the
City and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in advance
of the issuance of site preparation/building permits.
(Note: The wetland fill plan has been approved by the
Department of Ecology).
•
Traffic: 3) That the applicant directly provide regional traffic
improvements as stipulated by the Transportation
Systems Division or make a voluntary contribution to
the Grady .Way TBZ in the amount of $254,345.65
($185.00 per trip).
Note: The applicant will also need to provide an off-
site improvements plan, including streetlighting, curbs,
sidewalks, gutters and undergrounding of utility lines,
subject to the approval of the Public Works Department.
(See "Note #B below) •
Traffic: 4) That the applicant provide a TMP, including
carpooling/vanpooling, preferred parking, pedestrian
linkages to adjacent Oakesdale Avenue, subject to the
approval of METRO and the Transportation Systems
Division.
Traffic: 5) That the applicant provide an ingress/egress plan
(e.g. driveway location, dimensions and design) as
required by "Access Management to Streets and
Highways" or "ITE Transportation and Land
Development Standards" or as recommended by a
licensed transportation engineer in order to ensure safe,
efficient access for large trucks hauling products from
the site to the adjacent heavily-traveled Oakesdale
Avenue.
(Note #1: All traffic mitigation plans [Conditions #3
through #5, inclusive] must be approved and fees (if
established) paid in advance of the issuance of site
preparation/building permits for the, development.)
(Note #2: The development will generate additional
traffic [estimated at 83 trips per day] to the nearby
intersection of Martin Luther King Way and 68th
Street, where level of service "E" already exists.
Because this intersection is under the jurisdiction of
King County, the City will notify County officials.
The applicant may be called upon by the County to
participate in signal warrants at that intersection; the
applicant has been so advised.)
(Note #3: The Washington State Department of
Transportation may call for additional mitigation
measures if more than 10 trips occur on any state
highway during p.m. peak, hours during construction or
operations).
Storm Water: 6) That the applicant:
a) provide a revised site plan which elevates all
structures a minimum of two (2) feet above the defined
floodplain elevation of nineteen (19) feet; OR, b)
provide secondary containment for all structures to
minimize leakage of damaged products (e.g. from fire or
flood) to protect the underlying terrain against
contamination, over the life of the project; OR c)
provide a "hold harmless" agreement ensuring that the
municipality will not be responsible for any damage
occurring to the site or developments thereupon
resulting from flooding on the property. Plans and/or
agreements shall be subject to the approval of the Fire
Prevention Bureau and the Public Works Department
(agreements shall also be approved by the City
Attorney), and shall be provided in advance of the
issuance of site preparation/building permits.
Storm Water: 7) That the applicant shall provide a storm water
drainage management plan, in advance of the issuance
of site preparation/building permits, subject to approval
of the Public Works' Department, including: a) on-site
detention with 100 year/7 day design (with design
specifications provided in a supplementary soils
engineering report) (*); b) Type II catch basins with
baffled oil/water separators; and c) biofiltration swales
for storm water prior to entrance into the wetlands (fire
lanes adjacent to wetlands will require adequate
biofiltering buffer strips).
(*) There is an approved Soils Engineering Report on
file, but because staff is recommending a 100 year/7
day design system, rather than the customarily required
25 year/2 day design system, owing to site
characteristics -- e.g. elevations, wetlands -- the Report
will need to be modified with respect to design
specifications prior to the issuance of building permits.
Construction/Noise
I
•
Traffic: 5) That the applicant provide an ingress/egress plan
(e.g. driveway location, dimensions and design) as
required by "Access Management to Streets and
Highways" or "ITE Transportation and Land
Development Standards" or as recommended by a
licensed transportation engineer in order to ensure safe,
efficient access for large trucks hauling products from
the site to the adjacent heavily-traveled Oakesdale
Avenue.
(Note #1: All traffic mitigation plans [Conditions #3
through #5, inclusive] must be approved and fees (if
established) paid in advance of the issuance of site
preparation/building permits for the development.)
(Note #2: The development will generate additional
traffic [estimated at 83 trips per day] to the nearby
intersection of Martin Luther King Way and 68th
Street, where level of service "E" already exists.
Because this intersection is under the jurisdiction of
King County, the City will notify County officials.
The applicant may be called upon by the County to
participate in signal warrants at that intersection; the
applicant has been so advised.)
(Note #3: The Washington State Department of
Transportation may call for additional mitigation
measures if more than 10 trips occur on any state
highway during p.m. peak hours during construction or
operations).
Storm Water: 6) That the applicant:
a) provide a revised site plan which elevates all
structures a minimum of two (2) feet above the defined
floodplain elevation of nineteen (19) feet; OR, b)
provide secondary containment for all structures to
minimize leakage of damaged products (e.g. from fire or
flood) to protect the underlying terrain against
contamination, over the life of the project; OR c)
provide a "hold harmless" agreement ensuring that the
municipality will not be responsible for any damage
occurring to the site or developments thereupon
resulting from flooding on the property. Plans and/or
agreements shall be subject to the approval of the Fire
Prevention Bureau and the Public Works Department
(agreements shall also be approved by the City
Attorney), and shall be provided in advance of the
issuance of site preparation/building permits.
Storm Water: 7) That the applicant shall provide a storm water
drainage management plan, in advance of the issuance
of site preparation/building permits, subject to approval
of the Public Works Department, including: a) on-site
detention with 100 year/7 day design (with design
specifications provided in a supplementary soils
engineering report) (*); b) Type II catch basins with
baffled oil/water separators; and c) biofiltration swales
for storm water prior to entrance into the wetlands (fire
lanes adjacent to wetlands will require adequate
biofiltering buffer strips).
(*) There is an approved Soils Engineering Report on
file, but because staff is recommending a 100 year/7
day design system, rather than the customarily required
25 year/2 day design system, owing to site
characteristics -- e.g. elevations, wetlands -- the Report
• will need to be modified with respect to design
specifications prior to the issuance of building permits.
Construction/Noise
•
Light/Glare/Traffic 8) That the applicant provide a construction mitigation
plan including the following components: a) an erosion
control plan; b) a plan for protection of the wetland
area to be retained while the area to be eliminated is
being filled; c) a plan for wheel-washing of all
construction vehicles prior to leaving the site; d) water
down the site periodically to control dust and debris; e)
a plan for restriction of hauling routes and hours of
hauling operations; f) a plan for signage of site and
structures during construction to facilitate emergency
service provision; and g) a $5,000.00 cash bond for
street clean-up.
In addition the City requests:
Recreation: 1) That the applicant make a voluntary contribution in
the amount of $5,000.00 to the development of the
Master Trails Plan in the area of the site.
2) That the applicant provide a recorded easement to
establish a connection from the site to the proposed
adjacent Master Trail, for use by project employees,
subject to approval by the Landscape Planner and the
Parks and Recreation Department.
Note #A: Modifications to the site plan (architectural design), the exterior illumination plan, on-site
recreation plan and dryland landscaping plan (increased plantings; thematic integrity) and landscaping
maintenance bond will be required in conjunction with site plan review.
Note #B: Specific plans/specifications for on-site and off-site improvements, in compliance with
Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, Public Works Standards (Storm Water, Traffic, Water Flow and Fire
Flow) and related regulations, will be required at the time of site preparation/building permit
application.
mmdoc
CE MUELLER
ASSOC ATES/ARCHI ECTS ILET CF 4QQa]arruOVUM
130 Lakeside Suite 250
; SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122
DATE JOB NO.
(206) 325-2553 (FAX) 328-0554 ATT N ION I B • or a
- � A rzrJBpi- 15�A.v vtA,
TO Cicl,141
N 4 fL NIL 0-4 ii'Ll?ce �L WI, 1 b eL4 c DF K t)- (mac r=.,. .... -...,^I-;
D) APR 1 8 1990 ril
[II E
c ii_i prk L' i.)"
WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items:
—
❑ Shop drawings / Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications
❑ Copy of letter 0 hange order 0
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
C 6tt. lf7C. . 4 rre ?Lis
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
For your use 0 Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints
❑ or review and comment 0
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
ergf •©V I IvVyge ` 10419-0-12.56-e 4) i gpizy
e55,..„1 $ t ID • ID
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY F AEP I N
8 1910
C •,y
COPY TO t 1,e 4 IAA AA42,12,1,-Sf3'V1
1
13p. 6 ibtow 5 if Co. SIGNED:
It snelnsurns ars not as noted. kindly notify us at once.
LANCE MUELLER
ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECT; DJ 1J [ C3F UM AnG`ISGII IITITML ,
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122
. JOB NO.
(206) 325-2553 (FAX) 328.0554
TO FeKrt4tri \ 4 i1 k 4 o fz-0)--L1 b 1.1
FOMIN.1 tthstIr
WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop drawings (Prints
0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications
❑ Copy of letter 0 Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
a _ 7464 k_L
APR 1 8 .1990 I
is
f
I{ elrl '
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution
As requested ❑ Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
Cree, a-.}-� L� � ' i-ems • I • a
l- W\ ' _ — N FAe—r ,ate. p1+s -e.r
�#- latigd egos
AL / IVXMlt •O 64g t O ff , $IAD Gt, 441 is BLis a -hi(i
en4P L- I4 it.A" 5i,-r'� , .L 4 ��.� bk31 fit. ; .k L"ti`" D
COPY TO IMI
SIGNED:
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Environmental Review Committee
Renton, Washington
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a
Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following
project (s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The
following Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process:
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
ECF;SA-112-89
The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a
warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking and
service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is
a wetland on the site -- . 99 acre portion is proposed to be
filled and the remainder will be enhanced with native vegetation.
The 16 acre project site is vacant and is zoned for manufacturing
park use. The property is located at 601 Monster Road
Further information regarding this action is available in the
Community Development Department, Current Planning Division,
Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This
Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which
will end at 5: 00 PM on April 30, 1990. Any appeal of this
decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal
Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal
must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be
revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing
fee.
Published: April 16 1990
Account #51067
LANCE MUELLER
ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC___; UZflJ _13 OF
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122
DATE 4 t ( CD , L 1, JOH NO.
(206) 325-2553 (FAX) 328-0554 ATTEN•TIO u! eij I��IC��''J/J/JJ..�� 'M
TO 6 I\r8 I RE fsRti 6 6
C4t4 orp,eNtern,i im-rbA.1
Pkgd-rervir GkiA-
rh ,, .,� n
WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached ❑ Under separate cover via t the. i
❑ Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples L i It [fl❑i1Specifiaationvra o 1'
1 cif'
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
6 g 37_....0 m g SCA ged;1,477 b-Ki 11/4410
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution
P. s requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints
❑ or review and comment 0
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO r
SIGNED:
It anr.insuras arm not as tinted_ kindly neatly us at nnca.
ENVIRONMENTAL
DECLARATION
ECF;SA-112-89
APPLICATION NO.
PROPOSED ACTION BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
BRUCE BLUME
The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two
• structures, parking and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a wetland
on the site -- .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the remainder will be enhanced with
native vegetation. The 16 acre project site is vacant and is zoned for manufacturing park use.
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
The property is located at 601 Monster Road.
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED
PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
❑DOES UDOES NOT
HAVE. A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
❑WILL 11NILL NOT
BE REQUIRED.
THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS
PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW.
COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P.M., APRIL 30, 1990
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE _
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
CERTIFICATION
I , &rc Sok.Vfj& , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF
THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN •
CONSPICUOUS
PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBEC P.ROPERTY ON -$,— i-- y
•
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before.me
Notary Public, i and for the State of 41a hington - •
residing in , on the " ,SIGNED : MGtA4, g, at-1
(�!yr
day of -&, 199G
NOTICE
ENVIRONMENTAL
DECLARATION
ECF;SA-112-89
APPLICATION NO.
PROPOSED ACT I ON BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
BRUCE BLUME
The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a warehouse/office complex, including two
structures, parking and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a wetland
on the site -- .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the remainder will be enhanced with
native vegetation. The 16 acre project site is vacant and is zoned for manufacturing park use.
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
The property is located at 601 Monster Road.
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED
PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE ( E. R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
❑DOES VIDOES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
❑WILLWA/ILL NOT
BE REQUIRED.
THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS
PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW.
COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P. M., APRIL 30 , 1990
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5 - 2 5 5 D.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
•
CONFERENCE REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT: (.1 P M Dj57/ 801100 crif•
DATE OF CONFERENCE: . 4'' +"aZD PROJECT NO.
TIME: ppei (START) 5kI12te)C . (END)
NAME AND TITLE OF ORGANIZATION PHONE
PEOPLE ATTENDING
LLO.ca Vt,Pfiththinice, DIA ZAS -Z6 .
L Ow rki ( P( N i i G DAP 235-1.&sue
COMMENTS: 9.> `Ai ternAI S` 1qr9o...ks esimrals, •
i
• • .2
•
ett.A.L"••%.161.4*at
"A
City of Renton
Community Development Department
Memorandum
Date: April 11, 1990
To: Environmental Review Committee
From: Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Secretary
Subject: Reconsideration of DNS-M for Blume Distribution Company,
601 Monster Road S.W. (SA 112-90)
Staff Contact: Lenora Blauman
Project Manager
BACKGROUND
On February 18, 1990 the ERC issued a DNS - M for the Blume Distribution Company
project, a warehouse/office complex proposed for 601 Monster Road S.W.
During the comment period for this DNS-M, substantive comments and/or requests for
reconsideration of transportation mitigation measures were submitted by the proponent and by
the Department of Transportation. Similarly, substantive comments/requests for
reconsideration of measures designed to protect the natural environment were submitted by the
Audubon Society, the State Department of Wildlife and by a private citizen (John Kohlsaat).
Finally, METRO has submitted a letter stating that the applicant will need to take measures to
protect the effluent transfer station.
Based on these requests, the project is submitted to ERC for reconsideration.
FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATION
Transportation:
1) The Blume Distribution Company has requested that Condition #3 be modified to
indicate that the traffic mitigation fee ($254,345.65) would be "decreased if the
applicant can demonstrate that the project will generate fewer than 1,375 trips."
Staff believe that it is not acceptable to decrease the established traffic mitigation fee.
This fee is deemed to be reasonable, as it was derived by utilizing impacts determined
from the ITE Manual, and then modified (reduced) to reflect information provided by
the applicant's traffic study, providing an equitable assessment for anticipated impacts
f '
over the life of the project, and providing an appropriate level of credit for reduction of
trips below ITE standards, and have been assigned a mitigation fee.
Staff recommend:
That Condition#3 requiring that the applicant provide regional traffic improvements or
payment of a mitigation fee of$254,345.65 be retained without modification.
2) The Washington State Department of Transportation has requested that a new condition
be established, requiring the applicant to participate to his "fair share" for the addition
of a traffic signal at 68th Avenue South and Martin Luther King Way (SR 900).
Warrants have already been met for that signal; the estimated total cost is $500,000.00.
The applicant's traffic study also speaks to a need for this signal. The applicant's fair
share is estimated to be approximately $4,000 as derived by calculating the projected
project-related trip increase to this intersection (15% of the total 1410 ADWVTE -- or
211 trips), as a percentage of background traffic of 24,950 trips).
Staff believe that this is a reasonable request, because the project is anticipated to
generate a substantial number of trips through the intersection(as described previously),
both during construction and operation of the project (by trucks transporting products
to/from the warehouse, and by employees), as this route provides the most convenient
access to I-5 northbound and to local business districts; it also is a viable alternative
route to I-405 and to I-5 southbound. Similar requirements have been/will be
established for other like developments.
Staff recommend the addition of Condition #9 as follows:
That the applicant provide $4.000.00. as a fair share payment toward the Washington
State Department of Transportation project for the signalization of the (SR 900) Martin
Luther King Way/68th Avenue South intersection, subject to the approval of the City of
Renton Public Works Department and the King County Public Works Department.
Natural Environment:
1) The Audubon Society, State Department of Wildlife and Mr. Kohlsaat have expressed
approval of Condition #1 which calls for enhancement of wetlands on the site. The
applicant has reported willingness to improve the wetland, including adding ponds and
a conifer buffer of 30 to 50 feet to screen the development from the wetland, as
suggested by Shapiro and Associates (certified technicians who conducted the on-site
wetlands study) and the Audubon Society. Staff will work with the applicant to ensure
that the final plans protect the wetland adequately. Staff believe that the existing
Condition #1, which calls for wetland enhancement, is sufficient to require appropriate
improvements.
Additionally, each of the respondents has requested that the City also consider a
requirement for on-site in-kind replacement and enhancement to compensate for the .99
acre of wetland area which is slated to be filled. Staff is supportive of this suggested
new condition, as being appropriate for this site, where there is ample undeveloped
space and site characteristics which would facilitate the provision of in-kind
replacement to the existing wetlands on Parcel #4 to the south of the development.
Additionally, the State Department of Wildlife has asked that Condition #2 be modified
to require approval from that agency for the proposed .99 acre wetland fill plan (as
well as approval by the US Army Corp.). Staff believe that the Department of
Wildlife's interests will be adequately addressed through the proposed requirement that
in-kind replacement of wetlands be provided.
Finally, Mr. Kohlsaat has raised concerns about the manner in which the proposed fill
may interfere with the alleged water source provided to the wetland from nearby coal
mine shafts. Although, coal mine shafts do exist in the vicinity of the site, according
to U.S. Geological Maps, and the Office of Surface Mining, the shaft location is well-
away from the wetland to be filled and hydrology is such that there is no exchange of
water between the shaft and the wetlands.
Based upon concern expressed by various constituencies for the protection and
maintenance of the wetland, staff would also suggest the addition of a condition calling
for routine monitoring of the wetland areas by the City's landscape planner. (In the
event that the wetlands are not being maintained upon such inspection, monies could be
assigned from the landscape maintenance bond to care for the wetlands).
Staff recommend the addition of Conditions #10 and #11, to read as follows::
#10 That the applicant provide in-kind replacement (and enhancement) of wetlands to
compensate for the .99 acre of emergent wetland which is to be filled.
Replaced/enhanced wetland shall be between .55 acre and .99 acre and is to be
connected to existing wetland areas located on the northwest portion of now-
defined Parcel #4. Wetland replacement/enhancement plans are subject to
approval by the City's Landscape Planner and concurrence of the State
Department of Wildlife: replacement/enhancement shall be achieved prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
#11 That the applicant allow an annual inspection by the City of each and all of the
wetlands areas on now-defined Parcel #2 and now-defined Parcel #4 of the subject
Property, to ensure that these areas are being properly protected and maintained,
with inspection rights to be provided through an easement to allow access to the
site and a covenant to ensure that the easement runs with the land, to be valid for
the life of the project. These documents are to be approved by the City Attorney
and provided prior to the public hearing for Site Plan Approval.
Effluent Transfer Station:
METRO has a permanent easement for the Effluent Transfer Station line in the area of
the proposed development. The agency has called for assurance that they will have the
right to approve the project design, in order to protect that line, and for an agreement
to protect the right to maintain and repair the sewer line.
Staff recommend the addition of a new Condition #12 as follows:
#12. That the applicant. prior to public hearing for site plan approval. in order to
ensure protection of the effluent transfer system. obtain from METRO approval
of construction plans and provide an easement and covenant to run with the land
for METRO access to maintain and repair the sewer line. subject to approval by
METRO and the Renton City Attorney.
Thank you for your consideration.
CITY OF RENT ON
bit& Community Development Department
Earl Clymer, Mayor Kenneth E.Nyberg, Director
April 11, 1990
James Garrison
Bruce Blume and Company
146 North Canal
Seattle, Washington 98103
RE: Blume Distribution Company, 601 Monster Road S .W. , (112-89)
Dear Mr. Garrison:
As you are aware, the comment period expired on March 20, 1990
for the Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the
above-referenced project.
During that comment period, requests for reconsideration of the
Determination were submitted by your office, by the Audubon
Society, by John Kohlsaat, by the Washington State Departments of
Transportation and Wildlife, and by METRO. These issues --
including wetlands protection, transportation mitigation, and
protection of the effluent transfer system -- were considered by
the Environmental Review Committee on April 11, 1990 .
• The Committee unanimously agreed to:
1) Retain Condition #1, as presently stated, calling for
wetland landscaping plans. This condition provides a requirement
for plans to include enhancement with native vegetation, and must
be approved by the City. Narrative reports from Shapiro and
Associates (certified wetland biologists) and information
provided by the applicant indicates that plans are going forward
to develop an enhancement scheme (e.g. plantings, seasonal ponds)
which is likely to address issues raised by the City, and by
various agencies/individuals who commented upon the need to
preserve wetlands .
2) Retain Condition #3 , as presently stated, calling for
regional transportation improvements or a contribution of
$254 , 345 . 65 to the TBZ as originally stated, based upon the fact
that this assessment is designed to mitigate impacts estimated to
be generated by a warehouse/office development over the life of
the project, rather than for a specific day/type of use.
3) Add Condition #9 as follows: "That the applicant provide
$4 , 000 . 00 as a fair share payment toward the Washington State
Department of Transportation project for the signalization of the
(SR 900) Martin Luther King Way/68th Avenue South intersection,
mn Mill Avennp. .Cnnth - Rentnn Wachinctnn 9R(1SS
x
subject to. the approval of the City of Renton Public Works
Department and the King County Public Works Department." (See
attached Washington State Department of Transportation letters of
March 19 and April 10 , 1990) .
4) Add Condition #10 as follows: "That the applicant provide in-
kind replacement Land enhancement) of wetlands to compensate for
the . 99 acre of emergent wetland which is to be filled.
Replaced/enhanced wetland shall be between . 55 acre and . 99 acre
and is to be connected to existing wetland areas located on the
northwest portion of now-defined Parcel #4 . Wetland
replacement/enhancement plans are subject to approval by the
City's Landscape Planner and concurrence of the State Department
of .Wildlife; replacement/enhancement shall be achieved prior to
the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
5) Add Condition #11 as follows: "that the applicant allow an
annual inspection by the City of each and all of the wetlands
areas on now-defined Parcel #2 and now defined Parcel #4 of the
subject property., to ensure that. these areas are being properly_
protected and maintained, with inspection rights to be provided
through an easement to allow access to the site and a covenant to
ensure that the easement runs with the land, to be valid for the
life of the project. These documents are to be approved by the
City Attorney and provided prior to the public hearing for site
plan approval .
6) Add Condition #12 as follows: "That the applicant, prior to
public hearing . for. site plan approval , in order to ensure
protection of the effluent transfer system, obtain from METRO
approval of construction plans and provide an easement and
covenant to run with the land for METRO. access to maintain and
repair the sewer line, subject to approval by METRO and the
Renton City Attorney.
Conditions #2 and #4 - #8 inclusive were not submitted for
reconsideration; therefore, they remain as originally stated.
"Notes" included in the Determination are not environmental
review conditions, but are, rather, explanatory information.
Some of the matters addressed in those, notes may be converted to
conditions in conjunction with site plan review.
In addition to review of the above issues, staff explored impacts
•
upon the wetland from nearby Diamond Coal Mine Shafts. Reports
provided by and/or information obtained from the Dalton, Olmstead
and Fuglevand (certified geological engineers) , . Office of Surface
Mining - U. S . Government, U. S . Geological Survey maps, City of
Renton Public Works Department and the Department of Natural
Resources indicate that there are Diamond Coal Mine shafts in the
area of the site, but that their location and hydrology is such
that they do not interact with wetlands on Parcel #2 or Parcel #4
of this site. As no substantial impact is defined, no nexus
exists for establishment of mitigation measures.
The Committee's determination is now final. It may be appealed
to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5: 00 p.m. on April
30, 1990. Appeals may be filed by the proponent and/or by any
interested party. Any appeal must state clearly why the
determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-
refundable $75 . 00 filing fee.
If you have any questions or desire clarification, please contact
Lenora Blauman, project manager, at 235-2550 .
F e Environ al Re ' ew Committee
06147; J
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Secretary
cc: J. Kohlsaat
12057 SE 42nd ST
Bellevue, WA 98006
James Lutz , P.E.
WSDOT, District 1
15325 SE 30th PL
Bellevue, WA 98007
Tony Oppenhermer _
Dept. of Wildlife
16018 Mill creek Blvd.
Mill Creek, WA 98012
Gerry Adams
Seattle Audubon Society
619 Joshua Green Bldg
Seattle, WA 98101
Paul Leland
METRO
821 2nd Avenue, M/S 92
Seattle, WA 98104
WWashington State Duane Berentson
AIF Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation
District 1 •
15325 S.E.30th Place
Bellevue,Washington 98007
April 10, 1990
Don Erickson
Zoning Administrator
Planning Division
Community Development Department
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
SR 900 MP 8. 27 CS 1712
Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance
Blume Distribution Facility
File No. ECF; SA-112-89
Dear Mr. Erickson:
This letter is to correct an error in our letter March 19 ,
1990. We stated that the estimated cost of a signal at
Martin Luther King Jr. Way (SR 900) and 68th Avenue South
(Monster Road) was $250, 000.
We wish to revise that figure to the following:
Signal Equip. & Controller $125, 000
Widening and Channelization $125, 000
Design & Const. Engineering $100, 000
Right-of-Way Acquisition $125, 000
Total $500, 000
WSDOT recommends that the developer be conditioned to
participate in this project on a proportionate share basis.
The proportionate share formula should be:
WO Project traffic using the intersection
------ = Percentage
i y c\ Project + Background traffic in build-out year
WSDOT had traffic counts in April, 1989, at 24, 460. Using an
expontential growth factor of 1% for two years to the build-
out year (April, 1991) the "Background traffic in build-out
year" the figure of 24 , 950 AWDT may be used.
s �Y
1� w
Don Erickson
April 10, 1990
Page 2
The proportionate share percentage may then be applied to
the $500, 000 to obtain the maximum amount for payment at the
developers fair share contribution.
Should you have any questions and/or concerns, please feel
free to call Donald Hurter (562-4274) or Dick Aust (562-
4269) of my Developer Services Section.
Sincerely, .
A"' S L. LUTZ, P E.
ilities/Developer
services Engineer
DA:da
cc: State Aid WSDOT MS 121
04!10.'1990 11 : 17 FROM SHAPIRO TO 6334680 F. 02r0
SHAPIRO&
A sanAYES2
The Smith Tower
Suitt 1400
506 Second Avenue
Seattle
Washington 98104
Tel: 206/624.9190
Fax: 206/624.1901
April 10, 1990
Mr. Jim Garrison
Bruce Blume and Company
146 North Canal Street, Suite 310
Seattle, WA 98103
Re: Container Corporation (Blume Distribution Facility)
Wetland Mitigation (SHAPIRO #213212)
Dear Jim:
In response to your request, we met with Gerry Adams representing the Seattle
Audubon Society on your site in Renton to discuss potential mitigation for
wetland losses that would be associated with the proposed development. Tony
Opperman of the Washington Department Wildlife had also been invited, but he was
unable to attend.
After touring the site, and reviewing the proposed development plan, we
discussed potential mitigation opportunities. Gerry indicated he felt the site
served as afeeding area for great blue herons from the Black River rookery
during the late winter and early spring before the reed canarygrass on site
' became too tall for those birds. He suggested that screening of the proposed
development from the existing wetland area would be valuable. The screening
would consist of a zone primarily of conifer trees in the uplands surrounding
the wetland and in the outermost portions of the wetland near the building and
parking lot. Western red cedar and sitka spruce would be the most likely
species to use with some black cottonwoods and alders interspersed. Wetland
tolerant shrubs such as red twig dogwood and willows could be planted inside
this row of trees to provide additional habitats and dense screening close to
the ground.
The planting zone would be 30 to 50 feet in width and extend along the south
side of the building and the east side of the parking lot. Such plantings
should also be extended along the railroad track to provide additional buffer
there. We also discussed the creation of shallow seasonal ponds within the
wetland to create areas of open water which would support amphibians suitable as
food resources for the herons and other wetland species. Gerry considered such
04:10/1990 11 : 1c FROM SHAPIRO TO o334660 P. 03/03
Mr. Jim Garrison
April 10, 1990
Page Two
a mitigation plan would substantially reduce his concerns about habitat impacts
associated with the project. With your approval , we will begin developing
conceptual design plans for the mitigation plan as described. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call .
Sincerely,
SHAPIRO AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
06 2aJd Cf:10
Marc E. Boule , Senior Vice President
Physical and Biological Resources
cc: Jerry Adams
MEB:jj ..
NR23.13
SHAPIRDSL
ASSQUATESLi
it RULE
1;i,UlD1L1l ',
&COMPANY REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS
April 10, 1990
To: Lenora Blauman
From: Jim Garrison
RE: Letter of April 9, 1990
Dear Ms. Blauman;
Thank you for your letter of April 9, 1990, I found it
helpful to itemize elements for which you are needing further
information.
I have attached to this note:
1. A letter from Shapiro & Associates outlining what we
believe is a fundamental acceptable solution to wetland
mitigation. I will instruct Shapiro to proceed to document
their discussion with Audubon in a design format.
2 . An evaluation prepared by our geologist, Terry Olmsted,
relative to mining records on or adjacent to the property.
The mine maps provided by the Dept. of Natural Resources
indicate mines were unlikely to have been operated on the
site. Mine records indicate that mining in the immediate
vicinity was limited to the east side of Monster Road near
what is now the intersection of Oaksdale and Monster Road.
On the westerly portion of the site relatively shallow
bedrock underlies most of the site making it rather
unlikely that any unrecorded mining occurred on the
property.
Additionally, our grading/filling permit was completed and
submitted December 13, 1989 and the revised plans were re-
submitted April 6, 1990. The permit fee was paid December
13, 1989 in the amount of $675. 00. It is our understanding
that this permit is being processed concurrently with our
building permit.
Attached to your April 9, 1990 memorandum, is a Grading
License Form. Does this need to be processed prior to our
grading/filling permit or is it to be completed by our
contractor when our permit is ready to be picked up?
Sin
i 41ii,--
Jam s D. Garrisof /
cc. Bruce M. Blu
146 NORTH CANAL STREET, SUITE 310 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98103 (206)632-1800 FAX (206)633-4680
•
Dalton,Olmsted&Fuglevand,Inc.
Bruce Blume & Company
HEW-003-00 March 28, 1990
EVALUATION OF UNDERGROUND MINE WORKINGS
The general vicinity of the site is known to contain underground coal mine workings.
Review of USGS Seattle and Renton Quadrangles and Washington Department of
Natural Resources, Division of Mines and Geology, information indicates that
relatively shallow underground workings exist immediately east of Parcels 1 and 3
(see Figure 1).
• Specifically, the mine was known as the Diamond Mine, with a known opening east of
Monster Road adjacent to Parcels 1 and 3. In addition, a mine or prospect opening is
noted on the east side of Monster road on the USGS geologic map for the Renton
Quadrangle.
According to the Division of Mines and Geology and the U.S. Office of Surface
Mining, a collapse occurred in 1984 at about the intersection of Monster Road and the
south line of Section 13. The is now the approximate location of the intersection of
Oakesdale Avenue S.W. and Monster Road. The collapse occurred after the Corps of
Engineers dumped about 7 feet of fill, causing a sink hole about 25 feet in diameter
and 10 feet deep. This collapse was repaired by the United States Office of Surface
Mining, a federal agency that is funded to repair and restore such areas.
The Division of Mines and Geology maintains the mine map files. A copy of the
available mine map information and the final report of the Office of Surface Mining
are attached to this report (Appendix B). It should be kept in mind that the mine map
information is incomplete, and it should not be relied upon to show all existing
features. Review of geotechnical reports for the Metro Renton Treatment Plant
facilities did not reveal any discussion of mines or indication that underground mines
were found during their explorations.
Because of the proximity of Parcel 3 and 1 (CCA's Plant), there is a possibility that
the mine workings could have extended beneath these parcels, however, other than the
proximity issue, no other evidence such as reported subsidence were found.
This report has been prepared using generally accepted professional practices, related
to the nature of the work accomplished, in the same or similar localities, at the time
the services were performed. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Bruce
Blume & Company for specific application to the project purpose. This report does
not represent a legal opinion. No other conditions, expressed or implied, should be
understood.
u •
L
41
-4 � a
H .
x• e3
i
` p1.
er 11
s l 's kJ"- .
,...
.., .
„...
,,,•• 4Cirp.7_7:._.. ,-1 • • . ..1'•
;7, . ...c.,•• • ei....p • =----r-N-...„\,...)\
1 ,\\;� d�r••r„' p R ' e�' .34Z4 ^ ice' .
77/''''''''',,, (: .. \. \ e [pry as,.t
. 1 © \ � ( Ill �13 '� IN•
� Iiir--,47.1.....If ours fr4f►1 w , inrn� 1
n `:6;:ilte:::
en ` (Per * I
/-771N1314\ `. a �1 .-' .i( $siege _BV�Iµ
\.•• r \,\. logiiiLLsposaI i
/• :`\
I .1 ' 11m /4.I�.•
116
. • ilk t
,,y 1. •1 .. I
11 I I
�I 1 1 1 1---I 3 3
�•./Iy� , II IC`3
' • 1'•: V • • 1 ■ 11 1•
I 7i ::I•r :�:
.• . all. '.. I 11 J 11==
........_ =; Track :I..�
. . : ''.1.till:-.;417$, • Tii- B-1.1 iiiiTiZT:-.7.17-11fi:---- .- -
•
/A et,ron S I "=Z,o0o'
.
./tc,Inpry MoL+,•
Diamond Mine
B.AT(
•
•
F. i
Affro 1c cQ Le l "= 13 0
M1he,. Ma-r
NOTE: MINE MAP OF UNKOWN DATE ON FILE BRUCE BLUME&COMPANY `
AT WASHINGTON DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY CCA RENTON PROPERTY
DIAMOND MINE WORKINGS MAP
HEW-003-00 FIGURE B-1
DALTON,OLMSTED&FUCLEVAND,INC
OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING
WESTERN TECHNICAL CENTER
1020 FIFTEENTH STREET, BROOKS TOWERS
DENVER, COLORADO 80202
•
••
FINAL REPORT
•
DIAMOND MINE EMERGENCY
RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
WA-84-011
•
li
•i
��
Technical. Project Officer: lti,�•Q•
,, ��
/ngcrfKaldenbach
ys al Scientist
Federal Reclamation Project Branch
Final Report
Diamond Mine Emergency
Renton, King County, Washington
(WA-84-011)
I. Project Description
A. Location
The abandoned Diamond Mine is located in the SE1/4 SW1/4 Sec. 13,
T. 23 N. , R. 4 E. The subsidence hole over the mine is located on '
an active construction site of a flood control project in Renton,
Washington adjacent to Monster Road.
B. Problem
Subsidence occurred July 26, 1984, and was reported by the Soil
Conservation Service (SCS) to the Washington Department of Natural
Resources. The SCS is currently constructing a flood control
project in the area, and the site where subsidence occurred was
being used to stockpile fill material . The collapse occurred
after about 7 ft. of fill material had been placed on the site. ;I
The hole was 25 ft. in diameter, 10 ft. deep, and had about 1 ft.
of water in the bottom.
C. Objective
The hazard would be abated by filling the hole with gravel .
II. Project Documentation
A. The subsidence occurred on July 26, 1984. OSM and the Washington
Department Natural Resources conducted a site investigation on
July 31, 1984.
B. On August 16, 1984, the Washington Attorney General declared the
Diamond Mine eligible for reclamation funding under P.L. 95-87.
C. The Right-of-Entry was signed by the city of Renton Public Works
Director on August 9, 1984.
I'
D. A construction contract was awarded to Renton Sand and Gravel on
August 9, 1984, and construction began and was completed on
August 10, 1984.
I:.
�1
Y ,
,
1
III. Costs
The anticipated project cost was $1,300. Renton Sand and Gravel completed
the construction for a total project cost of $1,280.
IV. Conclusion/Accomplishments
The subsidence hole was completely filled with 220 cubic yards of pit run .
gravel . The total acreage reclaimed was less than .01 acres, but resulted
in the continued safety of the construction crew of about 30 men working in
the area.
ti� •IC}43:.' i•L:�. r j •1� is
•
e. r r i 1. ►• s::t.
•,•.,, •-•• ., -•• k. c.,..,,,:„.•••:.v„..:,„,,,.. . . • .
it r' 1 i � ••.'r
All . •
►irk '" • JA'A� AdVAt .,. r•�+ •I'V .1kr
•1 -,•�.:ram•
it.
i.44
4.
7 , 11
4 ; , ! i
ir.. . ... ' id ,Tr. .j TA:y1..V.'0,.% .%., ••• • .
~ f ' '3.
Rll Y:1. .,ri+,'�.•ilr J .. a :i3.• � ..— .—.:..
1
Subsidence Hole
1
! I
•
I, I
,• I
1, 1
i.
CONFERENCE REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT: - JP3ThWJU11D Iv f k)it, K, LUin6 4 (JO
DATE OF CONFERENCE: 4s /OiO PROJECT NO. S/9-
TIME: 4= 6 rivk (START) (END)
NAME AND TITLE OF ORGANIZATION PHONE
PEOPLE ATTENDING
eJ68/19 Li IUD P1R1urvinx 0551tieto
EN t'-)e_A �L AuP-i6L LAN N i N1 6 - 2 3S~�sS�
1---4 1)cr e c 1 506- 2-.6'53
--�i W ) t \ 73r € 11 3 --� CS-are
COMMENTS: � 7'i F _ ?f\e_-?_)) cc:'4\ Cc) :
K �P�- a� c � t'► LL;
�,� i
(i
I
,N .'-i- j-- 1
l,''KY (= r
:q__
/ -C-IT ------------ _______
-----.
f
®\Q i(
77 C
r_______..)_q, ct //,..//
E. .7b v
a\ /
---,:...___,--7 ...„ cet---m-
,n,,k,, - ,_e,--t:::).y L________
............______
‘.-- ,41 /,c, i
\.// , e'lW. I
-0;031
. i
9 ,42 00G1 ---• ot,S% Ni. Q01-V7 411.
i(I
1
.4 # i -ni.svci
L •
L________
1
r
i
i
1_ _ _
____„,____ _,..
sQ _...
. 1
1
. ______L;
c_g
,' / 1
_____�.____ yi _--_-_—
ii
(
L • Qo/ co-9/ p g ao� f
5, 621..
--J.
002 is __T__ _----. .
1
A_____....., , 0
.,
ii _____
c. # ---rv-Asla lr-
, 1-
;r, I
BUSH, ROED& HITCHINGS, INc.
1 2009 Minor Avenue East r,
Seattle,Washington 98102 CPA,�� tie.
Area 206/323-4144 6. vi /041
Fax 206/323-7135 APR T®�
%,':-,,,,-,
.ms:car. rJ
I
...4,41)
April 9, 1990
City of Renton
Planning Department
200 Mill South
Renton, WA 98055
Attn: Lenora Blauman
Re: Blume Distribution Facility
Dear Lenora:
It is my understanding from our conversation last week that you are
proceeding with processing of information for the segregation letter
requested in our original submittal of February 9, 1990 and revision
submitted March 22, 1990.
If this is not the case or if any additional information is required
please let me know immediately.
Very truly yours,
Arthur L. itching
• ALH/cd
cc: Jim Garrison, Bruce Blume & Company
`V IN \A ArIt% o ak, Lei-u_ f—'1 • /'-'`
CIVIL ENGINEERS/ LAND SURVEYORS
LANCE MUELLE IL CD F u a, msErniinl
ASSOCIATES/ARCHIreuTS
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 ATTENT DATE . 6" 77)
JOB NO.
N
(206) 325-2553 , ., oit2G h/ All C tielio/
.pTO r2=' ,40,/Alpi RE: �vG6
C - D r sic) glAt.1° /2le wA—
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
—
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order El
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
/1 -, / )1e '/
/
r_.5YZ-. ! . e 2- ,ovG ��-,
`8 • R4E eg L 10
2- 2x`1 /lei G�it,- G G Li_ f
ge--?‹. // AOPOGV i s k
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment 0
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED'AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
APR 6 1990
PQ\\
COPY TO LV
SIGNED:
PRODUCT 240.2 ( Ea I Inc,Croton,Mass 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
OF
ob
.2:U4 ERUCE BLUME AND I TO 2352513 F.U1
BRUCE
BLUME
&COMPANY -- -- kl•.rv,i r;1.1'i.3 •420 is
�C;h 90
EMO_MILE�RAKSMITTAL SHEET
TO: DATE: 4- S r 70
FAX # : ?, �J' 5/5
FROM: k •- c--"� �.r rim _
11.1=E_BS+tJNE& CON ANX
FAX #: (2061 633-4680
NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED Z- (INCLUDES COVER SHEET)
MESSAGE:
•
411
146 \ORTI I CANAL.ST . i`E ".ATTI.E. WASHINGGr()N 4810 (296
APE P9O 12:05 FROM BRUCE BLUME AND CO. TU 2.37�71.5 r.e�
1 ! U_:ME
i4 t �\1PA�1_ RI;AI I?5TAT1:
April 4, 1990
To: Lenora Blauman
From: Jim Carrison . #.
Re: Container Corp. Project
"•(a r Lenora:
41r our phone conversation yesterday, you should have
tic <^F�ived or will receive by tomorrow, revised site plan
dra.ings for the Eland project.
1. Relative to our lot segregation plan, you will see the
location of the public access easement for fire and
police, etc.
2. You will also note that we will complete a revised
wetland landscaping plan following our meeting with
Audubon and Dept. of Wildlife. In the alternative, we
can provide a preliminary wetland landscape plan and
modify it following our meetings with Audubon. Please
advise with you recommendation.
3. It is my understanding that our grading permit can be
released following the public hearing. Bob Fadden asked
that I confirm with you that our grading permit
processing is moving ahead. Please advise me.
4. As we try to move toward wrapping up loose ends in our
permit process, I want to keep our good communication
going. To that end, I would like to meet with you and
Bob Fadden next week, when schedules permit.
5. I have asked Don Marcy to coordinate the offsite
improvement deferral agreement and he will be contacting
Clint Morgan and/or you to finalize that issue.
Thank you.
sc, \'ORTI- C1NAi. e SEATTE,I. \\y\SIIINCT<)N 48IU3 (200, ,633-4680
TO riL P. e e
LANCE MUELLER
ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECT ELE ITTR CIF ITIU IZE DI ALL
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122
DATE ÷
' / ,� ? co JOBNO.
(206) 325.2553 ATTEN11ON G✓` A. �/�
RE: I ��� �,{/� � �IV V
TO t tisgo Gg .JtN1e151a
IZ:)1. 1 \\ Ni a v-1:›6r1-7 cpe r.i-ra NJ
¶ TVr.J
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items:
—
O Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications
O Copy of letter 0 Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
/1 LiaJJPC/3E rAcJ'
co Gawp k o f '44/ J
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
)in For your use ❑ Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution
— i
' As requested 0 Returned for corrections „ p _Return... corrected prints
❑ or review and comment 0
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 — 0 PRINTS RETURNED,\AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS , ii
..: APR 5 i990 ; 1
je,20.4...c,
COPY TO LZ�
SIGNED:
6 ` �.
LANCE MUELLER OO i ITR SEri circa
ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECT °
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122
DATE I ' /%� D JOB NO.
(206) 325-2553 ATTEN N E/ 9/- E L )M,4, /
TO —1/Ld Exi.7-6/\1 RE:
Et.(1145/SI eLANZ
�� 14 • id e b/\f
WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items:
O Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications
O Copy of letter 0 Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
Si tge p 2404/1 ebLDR.EE
/I / p /U s
— G/V/ls pL,A1J5
(2 A.2. -A-3 - PLR, p/•anls
lZ - or.c. fGrz, pL /u •
2- A5 /6v LevAr b/IS
M.014 efi7 x I I gerD uc r olds Al G/-.42-�43-•4�4--/A5
f 0P/ 5ssa-b eiJC-Lopss p S 44e
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked'below:
❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
k_ For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution
) ,s requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints
O For review and comment 0
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
fe/ISeA 4 S gee?,o g 7 D14s._..
� '.r APR 5 1930
iI`y 45 �9
COPY TO r7Lg
SIGNED
*-,...“'f
- . . IC•: METRO ENGR. SERVICES 2066841710 P. 1/2
ummeGIMETRONagis""""/""silsiiimaNwitisarwimisinm"issmataris-44rsemit
LxchaMunicnge ity f gMetropolitan+ Sz1Se and Ave • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 " o�9�N/0/1/
C �II-- 9d
SI!IkE TRANSMXSSIQN. COVER SHEET v404
DATE SENT: 171/ 3916
< U( OF /QEti17"QlY .
TRANSMITTED TO: U// Gu i1? Jr4G r 1// 1(J cekoti/T 7
Fax 0235-- 5�.
kt-F. P7&E &-:F' ../1Lu81
copy at LC E.e ©r 31a:1/4o
TRANSMITTED FROM: 62L... �.E1- /U,) //6
(Name) / (Mail Stop)
�L
(Phone)
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION NUMBER: (206) 684-1710
NO. OF PAGES TRANSMITTED:
(Including Cover Sheet)
?OR. INTERNAL STAFF USE ONLx:
ROJECT: Lf V/A P&miqrN( b/ J ,
ARMS/TASK NO. : -E-- r2.C2C if
SUBJECT:
NOTES:
F'.G/G HI-W b5 -*I 15: I HU LNGH. I�3 5 .ewbbew;#4.
::
;mETRc.-
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave e Seattle, WA 98104-1598
March 23, 1990
Environmental Review Committee
c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Determination of Nonsignificance
File No. : ECF-1 .2-89 Bruce Blume
Dear Environmental Review Committee:
Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no
significant impacts to Metro's public transportation
services. However, we have the following comments regarding
water quality and Metro's -wastewater facilities.
Metro 's Renton Effluent Transfer System (ETS) line is
located in the vicinity of this project. Construction
drawings for the project should be submitted to Metro' s
Engineering Services Division for review during design
development so that Metro staff can assess the project 's
impacts. For additional information, contact Rich Putney of
Engineering Services at 684-1291.
Metro has a permanent easement for the ETS line in the area
of the proposed development. Before this project is
approved, Metro must be assured the right to mertain and
repair the sewer line. In the event that the 1 .e must be
relocated, a new permanent easement must be provided. The
developer should contact Susan Solberg of Metro's Right-of-
and Property Section at 684-1336 regarding this matter.
We anticipate no significant degradation of surface water
quality provided that all proposed mitigation measures for
erosion and stormwater control, whether temporary or
permanent, are implemented in a timely manner. Stormwater
facilities should be inspected on a regular basis and
should be maintained in good working order.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment.
Sincerely,
•
dfru-,' Gregory M. Bush, Manager
Environmental Planning Division
GMB:p1g3557
Attachmc
J
52"j-6'f,
%0 CITY OF RENTON
1 paµ,; HEARING EXAMINER
=
Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman
®F /k
March 28 , 1990 .� AI* ��"O,, 4'
Gerry Adams
Seattle Audubon Society
619 Joshua Green Building
Seattle, WA 98101
Re: Your Appeal of Blume Distribution Facility
SA-112-89
Dear Mr. Adams:
This letter is intended to inform you of the status of the Blume
Distribution Facility environmental determination. Staff has informed
this office that your letter stating that you are appealing the
Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) is premature.
Your letter was received by this office during the 'official comment
period. It was the comment period which expired on March 20, 1990.
The ERC has not issued a final determination in the matter. Your
letter will be forwarded to the Planning Division for their
consideration. You may contact that division to keep abreast of the
environmental determination and measures that staff may impose.
Until final action has been taken, any attempt to appeal would be
premature. Please find enclosed- you original check. Once staff has
issued its final determination you may decide whether to file your
appeal again or accept the ERC' s determination.
If this office can be of any further assistance please feel free to
write.
Sincerely,
FRED J. UFMAN
HEARING EXAMINER
cc: ERC Members
Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
....A r•.• A_______ [�_._aL _ D..«a..« tx7oo}�inrrtnn o2occ - (1fl 935-9593
2
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON MAR 2 8 1990
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN
IEN Ohl
MEMORANDUM REARING EXAMINER
DATE: March 28, 1990
TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner
FRO D n Erickson, Chief, Current planning Division
SUBJECT: Appeal filed by Seattle Audubon Society
Blume Distribution Facility
File No's. ECF,SA-112-89
I am in receipt of your inter-office memo dated March 21, 1990
regarding the environmental appeal filed by the Audubon Society
(letter dated March 19, 1990) .
You have asked me if their appeal is timely. Their letter of
appeal is not timely because the Environmental Review Committee
imposed specific mitigation measures with the Determination of
Non-Significance. Because there were conditions, a fifteen (15)
day comment period was required by the City to solicit comments
from various agencies, jurisdictions,, individuals and parties of
record. The 15 day comment period extended until March 20, 1990.
The comments we have received, including the concerns addressed
by the Audubon Society, will be evaluated by the Environmental
Review Committee, and then the Environmental Determination will
be finalized and the start of a fourteen (14) day appeal period
will commence. At that time their appeal would be valid. You
may want to ask them to put it on hold pending the outcome of the
ERC's reconsideration of this item at their next regular meeting
on April 4, 1990.
DKE:JFL:blume:dskl2
Audubon
RECEIVED
33ocetcv MAR 2 01990
Washington Nonprofit Corporation CITY OF RENT'
619 Joshua Green Building • Seattle, WA 98101 • 206/622-6695 dd
HEARING EXAMINER
March 19, 1990
Mr. Fred J . Kaufman
Hearing Examiner
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98.055
RE: Blume Distribution Facility, SA-112-89
Dear Mr. Kaufman:
Seattle Audubon Society is comprised of 5 ,000 members and is ,
incorporated as a non-profit organization under the laws of the
State of Washington. The Society is dedicated to the
protection, preservation and enjoyment of wildlife, plants and
their supporting habitats , and to the wise use of natural
resources . We are concerned about environmental issues
throughout King County including the City of Renton.
The above captioned proposal is being planned for 601 Monster
Road which is across the street from the Renton Heron Rookery .
The great blue herons associated with the rookery use the site
for feeding and foraging. The great blue heron is extremely
sensitive to the intrusion of human related activity . A variety
of other wildlife exists on and/or uses the site including
migrating, resting, foraging and nesting waterfowl ; amphibians
and raptors . There are no mitigation measures for the
significant adverse effect on wildlife.
The proposal is to fill . 99 acre of the on site wetland.
Mitigating conditions for the loss of this portion of wetland
require the applicant to provide a. revised wetland landscaping
plan.
The loss of this wetland area has not been fully considered and
evaluated. Alternatives to the proposal have not been
considered that would minimize the loss of the wetland area .
•
Since the City has not provided appropriate mitigating measures
in its declaration, Seattle Audubon Society formally appeals the
Determination of Nonsignificance (Mitigated) of February 28 ,
1990 .
Respectfully submitted,
Gerry Adams
Vice President ,
Conservation
r
CITY OF RENTON
200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH
RENTON, WA 98055
206-235-2501 FAX# 235-2513
DATE MAR 27/ I !-{
Z PAGES (EXCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET)
ATTENTION: � I M (pAJSôtJ
FROM: &K, Y•` Ir„ JIJD
bD GF AMpMOK)
sac ►err w►evw►F,rv-M .
axle
d.
11.1 u on
•soceter
RECEIVED
•
MAR 201990
Washington-Nonprofit Corporation �g P ,,;
619 Joshua Green Building • Seattle, WA-98101- • 206/622-6695 CIT 1I OFC a a a 9'� •
HEARING EXAMINER
March 19 , 1990
Mr. Fred J . Kaufman .
Hearing Examiner
City of Renton •
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98.055
RE: Blume Distribution Facility, SA-112-89
Dear Mr. Kaufman.:
Seattle Audubon Society is comprised of 5 , 000 members and is
incorporated as a non-profit organization under the laws of the
State of Washington. The Society is dedicated to. the
protection, preservation and enjoyment of wildlife., plants and
their supporting habitats , and to the wise use of natural
resources . We are concerned about environmental issues
throughout King County including the City of Renton.
The above captioned proposal: is being planned for 601 Monster
Road which is across the street from the Renton Heron Rookery'.
The great blue herons associated with the rookery use the site
for feeding and foraging. The great blue heron is extremely
sensitive to the intrusion of human related activity . A variety
of other wildlife exists on and/or uses the site including.
migrating, resting, foraging and nesting. waterfowl ; amphibians
and raptors . There: are no mitigation measures for the
significant adverse effect on wildlife.
The proposal is to fill . 99 acre of. the. on site. wetland.
Mitigating conditions for the loss of this portion of wetland
require the applicant to provide a revised_ wetland landscaping
plan.
The loss of this wetland area has not been fully considered and
evaluated. Alternatives to the proposal have not been
considered that would minimize the loss of the wetland area .
Since the City has not provided appropriate mitigating measures
in its declaration, Seattle Audubon Society formally appeals the
Determination of Nonsignificance (Mitigated) of February 28 ,
1990 .
Respectfully submitted,
Gerry. Adams
Vice President ,
Conservation •
.-P:I"! ' ~7 CONTRA= R—O—Li TO: CITY OF RENTON MAR 23, 1990 4: 1'PM #282 P.21
JCmETRO 0,440
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle �'�9��L/S
Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 �i
F� �9�0
��L
4O
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET
DATE SENT:
TRANSMITTED TO: �_,A "\' 1 c<- (4 0 1",
,, ' 1" .,C.C.A...6 f_)A _
.-%1 e; ) -1"- 4 ._ -_ );.).)
TRANSMITTED FROM: ri,..4-...) C�.� `-»- " 11 • /!
(name) (mall stop)
Telephone No.: Li
" N ef )fi*
FAX NUMBER FOR CONTRACTS&RIGHT-OF-WAY: (208)384-1488
NO OF PAGES TRANSMITTED;
(induding cover sheet)
COMMENTS:
o:vanrvb.
+'IL RO CONTRACTS R-O-U TO: CITY OF RENTON MAR 23, 1990 4: 15PM #282 P.22
•
farMunicipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598
March 23, 1990
Environmental Review Committee
c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Determination of Nonsignificance
File No, : ECF-112-89 Bruce Blum
Dear Environmental Review Committee:
Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no
significant impacts to Metro's public transportation
services. However, we have the following comments regarding
water quality and Metro's wastewater facilities.
Metro' s Renton Effluent Transfer System (ETS) line is
located in the vicinity of this project. Construction
drawings for the project should be submitted to Metro' s
Engineering Services Division for review during design
development so that Metro staff can assess the project's
impacts. For additional information, contact Rich Putney of
Engineering Services at 684-1291.
Metro has a permanent easement for the ETS line in the area
of the proposed development. Before this project is
approved, Metro must be assured the right to maintain and
repair the sewer line. In the event that the line must be
relocated, a new permanent easement must be provided. The
developer should contact Susan Solberg of Metro's Right-of-
Way and Property Section at 684-1336 regarding this matter.
We anticipate no significant degradation of surface water
quality provided that all proposed mitigation measures for
erosion and stormwater control, whether temporary or
permanent, are implemented in a timely manner. Stormwater
: 44nETRD i
„ Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle p
LEA11- t _.
Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 AF RENT®ft!
March 23, 1990 A 6990
Environmental Review Committee
c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Determination of Nonsignificance
File No. : ECF-112-89 Bruce Blume
Dear Environmental Review Committee:
Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no
significant impacts to Metro' s public transportation
services. However, we have the following comments regarding
water quality and Metro's wastewater facilities.
Metro's Renton Effluent Transfer System (ETS) line is
located in the vicinity of this project. Construction
drawings for the project should be submitted to Metro' s
Engineering Services Division for review during design
development so that Metro staff can assess the project' s
impacts. For additional information, contact Rich Putney of
Engineering Services at 684-1291.
Metro has a permanent easement for the ETS line in the area
of the proposed development. Before this project is
approved, Metro must be assured the right to maintain and
repair the sewer line. In the event that the line must be
relocated, a. new permanent easement must be provided. The
developer should contact Susan Solberg of Metro's Right-of-
Way and Property Section at 684-1336 regarding this matter.
We anticipate no significant degradation of surface water
quality provided that all proposed mitigation measures for
erosion and stormwater control, whether temporary or
permanent, are implemented in a timely. manner. Stormwater
facilities should be inspected on a regular basis and
should be maintained in good working order.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment.
Sincerely,
Gregory M. Bus•. , Manager_,
Environmental Planning Division
GMB:p1g3557
Attachment
.. ,.-
t
, , • . ". , .-Y.,. , //
•
•
teOTE= UTILITY LOCATIONS AM APPROXIMATE tACATK>•I Of UTILITIES TO BE VERIFlFD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
•
li.ric THE E WI'RECENT
"'NIMBI,RAILI, A•'C ONST U TION. :"t�°" TR __ IN E THIS / ^."4 IPALITT �' ROPQ�Ni1p
AREA �C RECENT RAILROAD I;ONSTRUCT10n,THE$ CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY q / • '\.• l• I • TNElf CMAMOE! AND DET[RMINE TN[ tMt►AC1S tNtr MAY NAvt ON TNt PIIOP09ED ��/ � -', -� , eQ iEA T1F- -�OES• AU€ 'ARR - ORWORK. , /•_
N.
�;,
-� r Q LREFER TO SPEC. SECT.02485 FOR SPECIAL RESTORATION REOUINEMENTS BETWEEN -_` 11UARANTEE SHE C�U�fCI 'OR \ _
\\ -, }' i 8TA.0.04J5 AND APPROXIMATE STA.13•29 - r s l
n p; ,' �. ' COMPLETENESS OFE` BATA SNOiiN )
\ - •
R•572:86• a HERE - °
��\ .�_ _ \ �\ ' `�' T•32 30. l t y' �° n 174,9se w
T� \ �` LOIELIE SPUR TATIOK Of L■104.81' /�'� �O c E 1.65GIN .83CON64
., • `7'. ''''- L."--*: - . (.� -_r- +^ 1Z •• 'r $� ONITOR �IL' I ;� _� • _ 18 ETS-3D
illipitir...ii,
TRACT
.. .4. -�_`_ Lam-` 1 m y +'.c/ Q �� -♦- n • 62•W i- STA.0+04.I S
.`�� .a ~ .•.►.""" - - - 23. 30'OOe W ,L. 1.••5 d f1 . ,, . , N 33 55' 41
r r �_ - _... i �-_�-4 •f -+--•- ��� • ' �- �� .t BIDCIcStblMl
r L• �,` �a"'Swan``+ !�• • '� r-� _ �- ' c • rf .� _S: i .- s +�' I
1�----4 _ �__ "^ �.�. 11"---- �� _- �1 _r L y-= API. - �_': L1 __ F t E
r— '�.t.L �T ^ -_�_�� "== _J� .__ a - :� $ E IJ650.471. -
•
01
dL>k —116---�.�.�La 'tr 10 1 t M PP!s.1V NEL'.1• �, -oft JOINTS .� ., y I
. rF-- •.� 1 'mac Sett r I PIISFt•ON OIN�1 S _ ter,- �i
ea •
:....1 •. :A t r;?.::4444444-C i•I:I ..:.44:AQ s ` :TREMCN: 3 + tw A �Q
eeNtlysflT FtLt GCLAsc 1
' ISEE DVA 348 s
_dQiIP#lN4+.: _..-. .. cvT.w N'cAslnv • il... .. ..
.°2 .GOAD k 1
t I:1:: 1,,. 1�eca 1> AIu�.9� .
•---- •
P AND U IZE SUDO • j:::: : .
7ED NEAR:END OF 4 1
: —�_ E 1ST. PIPE FOR TEST NO 1 'SPUR TI1Wf . 120
it
+ •••• •• b F � Mlt PER SPEC. SECT 1E8-• ,.. ... 1
•
sir mr.1410E MAN[ Sri STEEL
-IliS
NI COUPS S ON 4256
.. .. .. . . .
•• k.... .
. ..... ."
• ,, ....
III
' 'i:Il•t11 III •t. ---I - .1.... .. .:. ... . .. . .
.. . . .. . 11...1.1.4st_
— ...../(1'
•
A irgle_ ;f•O:OOIQ� - -- ••• 1
INv 2:
li141.00 $
NK.E=1 a ` _
eg• N A5 BUiL
... r 1► 8fiVE4 JOINTS:.. •:::::: . a 1 �7i
14+� 13+00
M ..
12+00 11.00 10+00 9+00 8+00 7.00 6+00 5+00 4t00 3+00 2+00 41
' -' Ben JAn HSS
'Hun r•to' METRO Mrnklpollti of Metropolitan Seattle .Mw
1'1'•,I q: .. .1.. ,-) VERT 1'.Ip' .
URS G'NE �� ` +i� � y � r.��.00� •/�,•� � e AENTON EFFLUENT TRANSFER SYSTEM .��c _--
' • xlroetmental Met«r AreMI«IeMa R 0.41' . v • PLM 7=rit t. W/F Id-B5 ETS-3D STA. 0•00 TO STA.14.00 ar_K-r:•e•
BMtt*Mashing on L G swam' •"""'e' •••• '. " ? "T���........ [T3-sD WETLANDS TO 52 ND AVENUE vi'N {i .,_�
RAl v1ilbM-Aif h ••,•••--
mr - -
...... .711.--.
:.•
lir: 2:
• P.!..1
• • . . -
. .
. ,.
. - •.. • •-1, •:',-1:-,'`.14`,14-, , .s- 1.0":--:-,i-...1'!.-.--. :.AO
.. ._
* , .- ... . ., .„vigA!v.o• 7,. • F.
' ....--
. ., "• . ' , '
.. !••. .
„. .:, ,... .. .
. •tr. c''''''' , .
. -. !'s• ..,.._es••_-•,. ,.,.:1"-
,, ..
. . ,,_
' ' -' . T•4 ai 4"4`,..v. 1.b. ,
. + . . ' . ,i.'......,'.t j,'*; * .!, '-i,''I..,,,`,•-q,,e ..A' ''
. • . . • . 6 ... ,r 4..
. • • ',, .' , - • 6 ......•' ','V'e.,.1-7•'-'e....:.ti..- ',1'T4.
frj 4 .• ,.
&.°.
.• . .. .L r
I . . - P •••!‘" • -"- •-- •::-.4'.: , .'...t, -'•".'. .,
' '".T.'„ -.;..N.'''-e.Z•4: .
. . „
.. , '- .: - --.q.'±',1'-'',•77.; ,
. . ,
,
. • . . .. . ..- . •... -..: . . ,
. . It ' •1,,,,---17 41'14:..,''
. •
• - • ;-.• - II
- ° . .. . .i.. ,t41: • . . , - ,
• ° ,, -•,,, ..,.. ._•.- ' -. -
1.:. - .• . f.., '
;.;
IS
. . .
." • ,, .. . .
: .t...„,,_t. ,•. ,.
• -,.: •
. , • , .
:.. :. .
.- ,.. -. ' •
. . -. : ,.,„ ...,..•.-4,,-.:
..-
i:: • • • i4: .,
... ..
, ., .....,.
. . . .
...._. • . .,. ,
. ._., . . • -.'. . , •
1: .T1F -,.- :67.°L --..., :-r.::::::- . ..„. .. •-.-----::•-••••.-. ,, .-1.fr....:,. °_,,,;,..-ts-, -:.;',*,,,,.4.;`....t.,.-
..'
. • --;. .,..
• .
•ATTA,!..1?..ITY 1.0CATIVR,1 ATI.APPTICA4.1-A'..S.S,T•SIS CAr STILIT`C.:7..:SY,TA,FXS 111r,N......41f172-MX.T CPI
Mit' IKE AAPSTINA VEr,T,. •.•IT...11.,Ark,;?P.ATATIVZU,CR,115 1.1-WI CAIANAtt IT,T1i, ,
i.4...E.4 eTY PECF,7 le. .41.1 CCisSiitt:C.I'XIN.iffE OAT/TACT:41 G•I.E.....S1f...1`,,FL-R17. - -.7/-I/.:,C,_.,__ ••-,,_........._.........^" ; ,)
.. ' ..‘\40:f:. 1 f .
i •
,
"I'Ve_S!,:CKANAV..°:.11,',Z.:TTP_Still.AZ VIC lifils.7:t T111611 10111-11110.1.-2 Plf re:....,PascD
VICAR. „1// Y•// • 1. .y •/"-.1
,,U,.. , ,.
r%
. • .,_••, ,
-4- ,
..._____./ 1
,, . \. .
., ,.
. ._ - .&2,1•Erf.,,I TV SAC.ArCY.:11143.;TV1 SY'T.V.M.AST T.K1A-TIGN TICKANKEND:Kriral.Y1 ._ _,.., ,..• ,
r.' STA.0-C 4.1 C.--xt:9 ATP:ZS:MATS•,/,'..-.,•2t, • ./ •.
.
‘\ YrW.:, 'N' N'- •. ) ,
,
tar- '4'• .,'\''''\'\7-',‘.'\ 'e. J .
... , .
/ STA.14.1(0,...66.,:‘,1'.,-:4. 6,-4..:..,••....;,\, -...,,,, •;,.. C -•'"-•• !.
,..._,,.....,,K.K.i...ocre7N of .
. -,,p*.., •-• ,•,•,------,1::..k.., -:',
,. ---...1..--1C4..31'•"---•'•.' -'' e
Y .s.
r-----)-.- -",.
,,'
&.'.',,.,t',:,:,......'',''',.‘, ' -'•-,„.....,..,........„.... ....., ' _,____, ' . wu .n . ; • "..i,1.1. \ :'. -':,-... •...:',.,i,"._;q,''‘mwt:121..4;(;--_) ( 1---.I' .. :,•,,-,,z„,..z..i.,:',...„.:rtiS.;,4,..,'3',.:`,.....„:,:.-...„.......... -, ---" .-,•_-'--- --- „./ 1 ' ." ..• . 1
.----,.'',:',.q,-4.---,''',"•-•;;',-c--- ,:;.-'''''"iCi'-‘...'-------,-----?-- --7------ - I ;1,,; -i• ; '',',',..1.t.:1;.:'',., ,,'",. '---______;---_-_____' -...-- _...,-.---. --.__ - -- -,..=---_:.-7-_-...;:..:,47,..e'f,o.w 1,,,,.... ;vie. ___.2;5, ,;.____.,;!::,,,,-.:;*.i-11:1,,,,.k.,:, -_:,,' ..:,„ ., -___:,- ..\ : I. ,
' :- ----, 's,'''t.,>,4, ill:,•141., ; ...,--..,,,-,..„F,--- ____,,,,--,v,..,..._„._-„„-_-_,_-....- -_-_---_-,,zgo.ss,-___..----.-------......-,....„ `--:- ,...,„•,„„ -1,.:2-:-.'-:••:------„,--••,,L-_•-•_.1-....•."::1P-i2. tl 119,, ' °' 1. - °._V.=21---1-7.--; f°7'. - .._ -:-••••••:---L.-----.'_.-_: --------
.t., . ....."..:._.Atir,K....-- : . -:74:a---_-,..,-----,-,--__. -_----'=-----.°-± ---•7-_-_:------------......-- f., ----------7---=-----_,..--,--,7-..°E.- ---'-,E----z,:---1____---,---....__..1"-•,..,%,,r•-•:----."27:7',7.7,-,.]..7... .-7:----•".6:"..-•-•;-:•:',2-7----".'14 7:'65.t41.7...1.4--_, ,-,••:--= ----• . , "
,•., .
''• 1 IT '''\*k‘'V.45‘•,‘...:1•••.'. '-'• " .•---t---IT:-_-C,,.T.:=7---_1,.-- ---;11 -77_^..t,--4..,•;.:6-'' •• 1- --'""-?•T'T.__, ___.,.....-------'="`-' ‘-'-. ----. --_ ___•,--------'-'--'--------' '-'-'-----' . ..6-.. •-•- -T"----'.- ---- ---'
I ' ' ' -*•Xt.: "--""'-'-----zitz___
NI •-•„--„,____ .1,...4 -,-,,---,?•-.,,,._-...,z,.., .__:,---,--,__ _•--_. ------......::-..„-._ir,,-7.-,_ .;------_,-..-.._:------.-.----„_•v--- -----•-,___-•••=-_-_..:---_--,..z.a., -.i...j. v; ,;- ._ T..,.._;.••-",7-7::.1-:._•-:._--....,-.;,....:::::::-______-.----------,=---- ........,,-------. _ _ ,. ._,.,..:•- :..t_• •- - .PST!
t--1 iv, tT,--T•aT--•:..T_•-•,-c7.T:::"--(-"';;-'- ' ---7-TT,..-.----7--r---T.Z,------a.avv...ay.r.:-.,-'-'-.V.-.1--.-:_---•--•i1t,1•11„Z,..34442.•_-i,7-- _______,.....- ,----------_.. _......_,,.,,..-____:,:•-',.12:-.,_j.,...-,.-_ ___._1..........._-__ .: •;._4.
.• •• -1"--•• -' ._,..-••. ft:I:TT:7-r:77,-- .. •t. 1''.-
. i _.... __J._ --,--,----.------A---i--__-...--.--......--._______-..,-_-i_, ,__. •t_.___-__....__,',__. ., _ .-,•, : -.,., ,..?.,_ _.,___ ,:::...:_:;3-,,.; -•-1.--.1.-..---.:-----,------„-.-•=-Vt=1.:-;:i.1.-:•6- •,;j•. 1 t -I--•._.1J--:--•-- --------
.-.....41---6------•_••-,-.1-_-,,,.3,- .1.--'- -•.-'---''''`T-1----T'-t-TTT----1• ---`-'• ----'--------- --- ,. •''' , T .-q .. v____ I 0. .I.o.---1---,-- . ,• • , • - "--- ••
__ ..___ .,,_,
03 ' I----- -----‘----1-7.‘-'4,,A.-.,----------:--;:..,--:::7...,- -
-,--,-----,-..--- ..-,_,,.......- . '."--1----2.---_-_-_-_-',..-.:7'-- -
LD • , .....---,-- --„i..- --,-;,--, ----r---, ,-:GF.-::::,c!,-.,..r_..___,_-_,,,, _____ ...-...--- -._----_ ___• . , -------- - ----- a,,,,TC--,-45.7.."--- --
i
1.0 ..
0 ,
h 1 1 C.4.--14 _•-S'-r+'-T -'Tt--1 ,___1_,---.2._._.4, .. . 1 • ,z,.-----_,,-7_ -_-2••1,_ _i.!•:-..vP:22',„: -.-.,•„::: , :::J•--t tt t-t.:77.-:1,-,:.:7.-----77t4-. t t t,-..,,--,..., r. t,,-.--....42,-,-.,-,-,. : t.,. • - -•
r•• i 1 .. . •• -T-: 1--"-1:---`i ..r"-----1: ./.11.•;44,-R.:-.ir.ii:1,-,:17t--1.-'71:1:--::-:1:::.-- :-.1 .. ,.. .. .. i: . :::-: ,..1 ml:Nri YFT:,-•1'3•1•1"-'''.V•11'...`i.`'..olre .-:: L:•-•--r.2, -.-.::..F,. .:••'''..f'..:"'.-74.•: .,.-. ::t:i.:..-.-- 1
-."--7.......:-......iii------.......24•,.:•.-..................... .. ..................1...:-.7:--1.-..,,,._/" ..1,.,,• ,....1.,,,,,,,,...,1,-,•,,,,,•,1,itt.... ,E';--, :;,,-•;,,:•'...1,77.... .1:fitz_1 : :,,•:_.•;1_,..' -.,_„_,,: ,i,,.:11:.... .:...I,. :',..:-'22,.,1,.!..............1,. 1. ... ;........t____..:• •:_.1:::::•:.•1: .....a.._,_?/:-•• •: .::.7..:::i
-
,
IA .. •_______, . ____,
U 3 - - - .. . -- - . .... 17,_______----1,e• •,40.s-,---- ,..4‘i:'T,T3 •'../• . 1 . .: ... ..... . I
1-1 1. .,' 1.••. .. . T-TSq.'1,.1-c ,::',44,,..r.VII,:f4 ; .1...• . .. ..... . . . ... ... .... .. ..... ......... ... ..... .. .... . ;
1 ...... - -:::.:::: :::::::: ::::.:•: ' - 1-- -c'1°•!.. '-: -Z°11:".--'''''• 1. . . .- ......• • - '• " • . " - -- " 1 ........ ::-. :2. -,...:.• i
- . r: •': so L,- t.r...--.o •
. .. ..1 . . .]...::........i__ ._. ..1 ._ ____ i_ _. . :
CK ,.... ...._-....-_-. - --.. E.-: .-...,-...-,,..... ....r....... . ist-t.
:-....1:::...... \•:1:: • 1...:...•••••1:::.:.:.:.I........, . I , I . :.,, .... . . . . . ... .. . . vi• . . . .. . .. 1
.,.. . ....: :- , ... ,. .., . : . . . .., . : : • -.,•.,.....-:::.:,fg . •• ••• - - -- • 1 . • rc,..o AXE/U a 12E B ,.. ,,
• - At CO 'k• r....... ........•.': .......'• .. .\i ........:L.... . . .- 1 . . 1 • . .. 1 ...,:,.,.... .„ :',' , ' ... I. Y.,--.,.: . ,, -- •-••• •••1-S".•........ S'• c-- .-.. ----.., - - . ,- I •••:•4:41szp,p-g. ...-.1-Esiii9H-t.1
. •,_____201.•.S.S..•1. . - . • • ; •• • • i. .:.. '1-' -'.:?"..”•'.'1.---\••• •• . S ..• •.1„. •- -'.1_.21S1.3.: 11-12.46. 1.-•13,- ',.••1_,,tit1--`:..1...16---Ig.6. ".•" . ••1•-''' :.:.:•:'I:: -:•-i-. ":LLIE:-:L::Z,;•:1-.1-ii ......................:P1AnhicAi.-=-o-.... ,] ,_-1::-•.. /.
N-• . . • ,. -.1•:•• •• •,•••• •.••.• ..- :.-1,----,L.,....„_:_z..1-----7.77:- •:-.: _NT..., : 1:::.-: i-. -- 1-.. . ..1 . •1 : :--,-.',.---,1•),:.---..„4-:,:..:..i?;:-.--- .... ---,.. ,,,Ii; : :.t . • i
----.. , - • •,,,,tg- •-•: 1 ••• - - •-• -1:7-••• - --- 1• .1-,,,..1 •-,, .rt,,,;
Ln, ......... . . .... ............... ... .. ..-....
- ' . ... 1 .. . . . -
I..........-1:'.•." :-... ... •. - -- - t.:: : :. ..-...i',.....1...'.::I`k --7....,...... ........:,:ct-:.-....'-'-'-. tH,... ..-.-.-2--..:..E.-:..',-:-.7-:_....-.1 - ',-... 1;•:: . '...1.::::- I::.::::_•1 P.1 .1.\_,....;'..-.:: ,......____. , . ..... .t... ...;. ... 1 ..,_-_,_,..,,,,,,t,...
i.,-..- r•••. ,,,,,,,,,,-.• • •••• .......,•......•-• ,
. .. .. . . .. .... .L.... ...„...... ...., . . . ... . ... . .,..,_.,:•:__...„...,,.._. _....,, i, _ _ ::_i______ _,
.,. .....,. .. . , •,.:.• _.:.........._
0 - ---ni i:::. :••:,:._.. . • i . .. .., . . t. •• . :.,:••••..,,• ,,,,„..,, ..„..,4„.2_,_••,„__ t, _., ., __ ,. ,•_ ,•,. _ ,.,_. - • __, • 7.77:71_ .. .. .. .....1 ..,.. 1 .. • _ ...... ..i :•:,...• .. :
il
iY ,4" - 1 1 - •-• -I - •--1 7777 ---• 1 ' • ' • • I• - :I • • -1 ••• •••.:1.. 1 - I - ; , 1 . .• . . ..Wit,
?• ,.:.:...::;. • "
I . .....I ... . ..... ... I ,
L.
IA ;? °F,,,,-.1. ,:i-• -,__,4- ---f-- I ---:- ---•=•:••••-:'-----4 ---4- -.1.---------''1------LE. :":" ------- --L -47.------,-,---4------- • 7..s‘.-...‘: .''..77 • -• - • .1 2.A : ...:r •.'
.- 1 _I.. ...... -. •,..-.....0(.-j.i.,},' •- - ....... ' - . . - ,osoi1-1000: RN e.4.
I •: ,,,, . .t, .;21,- ... .. ,. ..,,, tl:,, .. ., , ....„77..,___7.:‘ tt. :,, t :tztt . . . ... . . ,....t.m,.:. t
, ... „..... .1. . . . T. .. : ..:1..: • ,fY-,-; . . ..1: :' .1--:-9.1.1t t t1-1.q4- :, ..... ..,.. ..: ;7--+INV.; 7‘,19 . .. .. ---._.:.--} '..:' ....._ ...
0-.1 • ,_,.....,____, -- ,,,..: :........_L:._-__--••f_:...." • -----:-: ::•:1::: .... •*: ......'..:...:.:r:::.: ::-1'. -.....-I... 1--. --.---` . • .1,----:'-',':::,---4-7- .. .-7-71-."------1---•-.:• J• ...... IT:: :-•: 11 -1'1 1•.I:1-1-1-"•1(a'N'Ill -* ::: 1. *::'''•I-A*-•ti L i :
.. 4_1 .• ' ; •; :: -1--::•: . • :::::•L•• •••;-• • - 1 :•:: :.••• 1. •••••• • :::- - -1- •-• I _.•:: --; .: :: T-:.•:::..:,• -.•-., -.. •-; :: ;,.. .. .. . .4E:SVC:LI,!-OITS'i: ... . . :1 ... .,. ... 1 . .. . . . . ...i,1 •
-7r 4:,;• 1.. ......I.......:.1... :. :.1:
-, . r . -. ••••)..... •• )••• • •,..... • t•" -- !-" -.. : - -. .•• :.t. -• ::..-.. , 1,,•:• • • • • ..::,. . • 1:...:.:. :: ....:.1. • ••,..], : 7;11(.14ced Tc./itilf-'61::c':., ••
• • I. ; • ; L, J._,-..- --.-:.:. 1_
):rY:, (.,,,-.1n T.C-') 04 F,,..C. t...,Cr0 4,c,0 .34C,0
2-+CO 1.00 cf..
q- --.,-------i-------- -
'. ---- i''.-- ''.--r---T---vP,_. '''',""•k, . ="•.....'''''''-7,,..fir----7‘
?.!....ei',.. ', -- ,..,_..i.,r4:-..1.3 : r 1 '•,,Z7i.,-It::Tti',t._ -7...r, 111 g'E..; :1 1.:: ..t..1_W.:1%1,1AI'114 1,71.1revalllee Snale10
t-, -„- , . •Ji';,•1---. 2,71. '''-':'1.41::17E-1:,,ii:i;•--1 '::41': C,-3, -0 ::::°/.,,`-',,:'-'i-,-1,j,'•1.:"-.''.-.'" {''-----...-4.L!- -,Y1-,...---.T.--I F..2.Pi T 0 A e 1TF1.1'1131. 131ANAFf A a YSITTK
*i ' ,
1.-K.A.A 1'.(..• . • `- •
,,.. .r_....._______.,
..•,,,- „,,.::-....:04.0.- f t•yt..',-.-,6,1,;114 11':.1., 1.e.,-1..:115•v,.....n.. ti.r/F I''.,-eo ET:3.:24.2 1.17A.1").‘,.$TS S TA.844-00
'f.--....,t•-y;',71 .. :' ::.n.,- -.,,-,^,,------' ---.`. ,L.: ',,(, .,,, ..7,,,.\.:,,,,,,,,,...:,J.----....,
•-••'...,-.31--%•.?!../ '1,-";;;,..;:.••:-.) .2•'•',‘....---,...3.....--' •'...."T" - - .-1 ,:v..--...o . ,,,VF..11._AN-Y..; TO '32 UI-.. AVE sk;t: -.'.'.' 7,-".
0_ ,..._t I.• I' -•- -"
Ap,..,,= ., •-•,'........ ...,
a .
. .
4
. , .
/
\ .
March 20 , 1990
Mr. Donald K. Erickson .
Chief, Current Planning
Community Development Department
City of Renton
200 Mill Ave. South
Renton, Wa. 98055
Re: Blume Distribution Facility
File. No. ECF; SA-112-89
Dear Mr. Erickson:
This letter contains the comments of Bruce Blume & Company,
the applicant for the above-referenced project, in the
proposed mitigated determination of non-significance issued
by you on March 5 , 1990 . Our comments are as follows :
1 . Traffic - Condition No. 3 : We request that an
additional sentence be added to this condition that reads
( as follows: "The voluntary contribution may be decreased
lif the applicant can demonstrate that the project will
generate fewer than 1, 375 trips. "
2 . It is our understanding that the notes contained in the
proposed mitigated determination of non-significance are
not proposed conditions, and will not necessarily be
contained in the final mitigated determination of non-
significance. However, if the notes do become
conditions, we request the following changes :
a. Note. Please clarify that the off-site improvements
referenced in the note are street frontage
improvements on the property where the project is to
be constructed.
b. Note No. 1. If this note becomes a condition to the
final mitigated determination of non-significance,
please add the following sentence at the end of the
condition: "Payment of the fees may be deferred to
issuance of occupancy permits for the development if
such deferral is approved by the transportation
I-t;, `.i)f i .. ! '.'..\I. ti•1.i l{ii I. �t i i i... i'I I.i.. • \ 1(1'\ ., .).; i.:''•. .
INTER—OFFICE MEMO
TO : DON ERIC-KSON, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE March 21 , 1990
. FROM: . HEARING EXAMINER , FRED J . KAUFMAN/
RE: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY, SA.-112-89 •
Attached find a copy of an appeal filed by Seattle Audubon Society on
the above Site Plan.
Is this appeal timely???
abea-ttle •
4w1ubon
3oci�'tp RECEIVED
MAR 201990
Washington Nonprofit Corporation •g-�p
619 Joshua Green Building • Seattle, WA 98101 • 206/622-6695 CI e g �� RENT ON
HEARING EXAMINER
March 19 , 19'90
Mr. Fred J . Kaufman -
Hearing Examiner
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98.055
RE: Blume Distribution Facility, SA-112-89
Dear Mr . Kaufman:
Seattle Audubon Society is comprised of 5 ,000 members and is
incorporated as a non-profit organization under the laws of the
State of Washington. The Society is dedicated to the
protection, preservation and enjoyment of wildlife, plants and
their supporting habitats , and to the wise use of natural
resources . We are concerned about environmental issues
• throughout King County including the City of Renton.
The above captioned proposal is being planned for 601 Monster
Road which is across the street from the Renton Heron Rookery .
The great blue herons associated with the rookery use the site
for feeding and foraging. The great blue heron is extremely
sensitive to the intrusion of human related activity . A variety
of other wildlife exists on and/or uses the site including
migrating, resting., foraging and nesting waterfowl ; amphibians
and raptors.. There are-no mitigation measures for the
significant adverse effect on wildlife.
The proposal is to fill . 99 acre of the on site wetland.
Mitigating conditions for the loss of this portion of wetland
require the applicant to provide a revised wetland landscaping .
plan.
The loss of this wetland area has not, been fully considered and
evaluated. Alternatives. to the proposal have not been
considered that would minimize the loss of the wetland area .
Since the City has not provided appropriate mitigating measures
in its declaration, Seattle Audubon Society formally appeals the
Determination of Nonsignificance (Mitigated) of February 28 ,
' 1990 .
Respectfully submitted,
•
67;: t .
Gerry Adams
Vice President ,
Conservation
- J
PLANNING DIVE
CITY OF RENTiaN
BRUCE MAR 2 3 1990
ill i(L.J ME i-- .,�' i�v Erg t �.�E-,
(Sc COMPANY te'1 D REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS
March 20, 1990
Mr. Donald K. Erickson
Chief, Current Planning
Community Development Department
City of Renton
200 Mill Ave. South
Renton, Wa. 98055
Re: Blume Distribution Facility
File. No. ECF; SA-112-89
Dear Mr. Erickson:
This letter contains the comments of Bruce Blume & Company,
the applicant for the above-referenced project, in the
proposed mitigated determination of non-significance issued
by you on March 5, 1990. Our comments are as follows:
1. Traffic - Condition No. 3 : We request that an
additional sentence be added to this condition that reads
as follows: "The voluntary contribution may be decreased
if the applicant can demonstrate that the project will
generate fewer than 1, 375 trips. "
2 . It is our understanding that the notes contained in the
proposed mitigated determination of non-significance are
not proposed conditions, and will not necessarily be
contained in the final mitigated determination of non-
significance. However, if the notes do become
conditions, we request the following changes:
a. Note. Please clarify that the off-site improvements
referenced in the note are street frontage
improvements on the property where the project is to
be constructed.
b. Note No. 1. If this note becomes a condition to the
final mitigated determination of non-significance,
please add the following sentence at the end of the
condition: "Payment of the fees may be deferred to
issuance of occupancy permits for the development if
such deferral is approved by the transportation
146 NORTH CANAL STREET, SUITE 310 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98103 (206)632-1800 FAX (206)633-4680
division and the city attorney of the City of
Renton. "
We appreciate your consideration of our comments. If you
have any questions regarding these comments, please call so
that we may discuss your questions.
Sincerely,
BRUCE BLUME & COMP Y
James D. Garrison
cc: Mr. Sid W. Eland, Jr.
Mr. Bruce M. Blume
Washington State Duane Berentson
/ Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation
District 1
15325 S.E.30th Place
Bellevue,Washington 98007
March 19 , 1990
Don Erickson E _.,
Zoning Administrator
Planning Division PI
Community Development Department MAR 2 0 ` ,1990
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055 'i `-
SR 900 MP 8 . 27 CS 1712
Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance
Blume Distribution Facility
File No. ECF; SA-112-89
Dear Mr. Erickson:
This letter is in response to the above MDNS. The proposed
project involves construction of a two building distribution
facility containing 285, 835 sq. ft. The proposal is located
at 601 Monster Road.
This proposal has the capability of seriously impacting the
intersection of Martin Luther King Jr. Way (SR 900) and 68th
Avenue South. This intersection is currently ranked 31st for
future signalization. Warrants have been met. Funding could
come as early as the 1991-93 biennium. The estimated cost of
this signal is approximately $250, 000.
WSDOT recommends that the developer be conditioned to
participate in this project on a proportionate share basis.
Should you have any questions and/or concerns, please feel
free to call Donald Hurter (562-4274) or Dick Aust (562-
4274) of my Developer section.
Sincerely,
JAMES L. LUTZ, P.E.
Utilities/Developer
�SS�'-
Services Engineer
DA:da
cc: State Aid WSDOT MS 121
""SJr �`- lr' "• • STAT ..
y _ 526 on S10
CURTI SNITCH :2 • �' �
Director '4'•1;ass aoy
PLANNING DIVISION
STATE OF WASHINGTON CITE'OF RENTON •
DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE MAR 2 2 1990 •
16018 Mill Creek Blvd., Mill Creek, WA 98012 Tel. (206) ECEIVES
• March 19, 1990
Don Erickson, Environmental Review Committee
Current Planning Division
Community Development Department
200,,Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Re: ECF-112-89; Blume Distribution Facility; MDNS
Dear Mr. Erickson:
The Department of Wildlife supports the mitigation conditions for stormwater
control, specifically on-site detention with 100 year/7 day design, oil/
water separators and swales for biofiltering--.runoff before it flows into the
wetlands. This is especially important since there are at least 9.5 acres
of impervious coverage proposed.
Department of Wildlife policy (policy 3000) recommends mitigation on per-
mits/documents issued by other agencies. Full mitigation ensures no net ".
loss of habitat or populations. The only mitigation proposed for filling
.99 acres of wetlands, noted in the checklist, is enhancement with veget.
tation of the remaining wetlands. We recommend in-kind replacement for
the emergent wetlands being filled in addition to the enhancement.
The existing emergent wetland presently provides the best habitat., on this
site, 'for a variety of small wildlife species. Most of thisLhabi.tat will
be lost to. the fill and building construction. There appears to be
adequate area elsewhere on the site where this type of habitat could be
recreated. If protected with buffer vegetation for screening, a created
area would likely be colonized by those species displaced by the con-- .
struction.
Noted in the MDNS recommendations (Earth #2) is that the Department of
Ecology has approved a wetland fill plan. Department of Wildlife staff
:: - 3
•
Blume Distribution Facility
March 19, 1990
Page 2
would also like to review the plan as our concerns may be adequately
addressed.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
Sincerely,
{941 Tony Opp nn.
Habitat Biologist
TO:km
cc: Habitat Management--Olympia
El"
IUTI
I
ENVIRONMENTAL
DECLARATION
•
APPLICATION NO. ECF.;SA-112-89
APPLICANT BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
BRUCE BLUME
PROPOSED ACTION The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a
warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking and service areas,
landscaping and recreational amentties. There is a wetland on the site--.99 acre
portion is proposed to be filled and the remainder will be enhanced with native
ve8DiggiALTb`GAalcforiraibt/86eAibaiantSand is zoned for manfacturinguse park
ES
The property is located at 601 Monster Road.
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
(E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
DOES 'DOES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
WILL IWILL NOT
BE REQUIRED.
THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS
PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW.
COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY March 20, 1990
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P.M.,
FOR'FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION.
- CERTIFICATION
I , M j �&ve. `o , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF
THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME Ifs CONSPICUOUS
PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 3 /6 - 9 1 •
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Publi in, or ttye State of Washington •
residing in 7:,ar,(� f , on the `6i al SIGNED : "y!'J„Ae,
day of Y 7� `f �/
N OT I C E
ENVIRONMENTAL
DECLARATION
APPLICATION NO. ECF;SA-112-89
APPLICANT BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
BRUCE BLUME
PROPOSED ACTION The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a
warehouse/office complex, including two structures, parking and service areas,
landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a wetland on the site--.99 acre'
portion is proposed to be filled and the remainder will be enhanced with native
vede i AL T�ibeVirotrA44�t/ Ab 1� arttSand is zoned for manfacturing park
ES use.
The property is located at 601 Monster Road.
• POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
(E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
DOES >04DOES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
WILL IWILL NOT
BE REQUIRED.
THE CITY 'OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS
PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW.
COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY March 20, 1990
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:0,0 P.M.,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0.
DO 'NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION.
•
Ir�,i;I P1':.'; �! DMS'ON
March 15, 1990 Ff 1JC I OF RENTO
John Kohlsaat
12057 SE 42nd Street
MAR I. 6 1990.
Bellevue, WA 98006 C Tr; 11 � E
(206) 562-3108
T2e on earins ExaniinG1z
P�►J't�rl �i .►rt LNS D1 -rrAlepT"
-Rem, WA 98XXX
Subject: Environmental Declaration Apllication No. ECF; SA_112-89 (Blume Distri-
bution Facility - 601 Monster Road, Renton).
I would like to express my concern about the above Environmental Declaration
Application because of the following reasons:
• An active Great Blue Heron rookery site exists across the street from
the site. The herons use the wetland on the proposed site for feeding.
• The proposed partial filling of the wetland, and proposed use of land
surrounding it, poses a signifcantly adverse impact on the rookery.
• The land use proposed may eliminate possible food sources for the
herons and several species of hawks which frequent the area.
• The hill adjacent to the site was once a coal mine. The mine shafts
were never filled in. The shafts collect water during the rainy season
and the wetland of the proposed site acts as a drain field for the water.
The effects of filling this wetland, or of severing the wetland from one
of its water sources (the mine shafts) has not been properly addressed.
The Application states that the City of Renton Environronmental Review Committee
(E.R.C.) has determined: 1) the proposed action does not have a signicant adverse
effect on the environment and 2) an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) will not be
required. I contend that the proposed action does pose a significant adverse threat
to the local environment and therefore an EIS should be required.
I recommend that the subject Application be denied until all possible impacts of
the proposed land fill and usage are adequately addressed through additional review
by the E.R.C.
Please keep me informed of the continued processing of this application.
Sincerely,
ohn Kohlsaat •
•
•
•
•
•
•
Sandra Hasegawa
Landscape Architect �
4717 W. Ruffner St.
Seattle, Wa. 98199
. +nmN/=GW1V0IOw
OPRENTOly
� �
City of Renton Land Use and Planning Department MAR � 1990
200 Mill Avenue So. �����*��K�V���
Renton, , W�\ 98055 = "e=����8 �y��n�
re: Container Corporation
February 6, 1990
Dear Planners;
As my association with Earth Egterprises ended effective
January 31 , 1990, I would like to inform you that any
revisions made after this date on the above referenced
drawing, as well as any other projects on Earth Enterprises
title block must be restamped by another Landscape
Architect.
If you have any questions, please call me at 285-8044.
Sincerely,
Sandra Hasegawa
Landscape Architect
.
Sandra Hasegawa
',4 4717 W Ruffer qf' ik y_ �r�` _ , ,4 ,-
Seattle WA 98199 i ,k, P m 17 ------ __�a=... -al
$ tutAR -_ — '_ X.vr' 'Q 1
(4..._. Z/VC- CIA'sq/(/ ZIA'ZI-11 12/7 4-
o ,
2aa
Gt24 . 90ss
CITY Or RENTON
•
MAR 9 1990
RECEWD
' 1
.:. CURRE ...P::::: '>'�: �<: �<�<::>.>:> :>::>:: ::�>:�:::>:: ...:. . .. .. . . . ...DIVISION ...............................:. ...............
- On the . day of a,,r�Jim , 19 90 , I
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed
envelope containing ane_c_Lk\s
documents. This information was .sent to:
Name Representing
CCU �V, �+�,
-R=)14,0,.e1, raft .-6-Z
Q�fYI� l VT—. - kr)O T&Tc0-1? (--6Lc\sH I'VfLot_r (C.OW./-vc".:
(Signature of Sender) . Ry^
Subscribed and sworn to me this 7 j/-/ day of IA4kCH
19 ciO .
Nor ry •Public in and for the
State of Washington residing
at C k.51-6 J
therein.
rojeat Name
•
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 9, 1990
TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner
1-441
FROM: Arlene Haight, Property Managementali,-e ..
Randy Phelps, Survey
SUBJECT: Blume Distribution Company Segregation #112-89
The error of closure of the total boundary for the above-referenced segregation is
not within the tolerances allowed.
I� ■ The addition of the square footage given for the four parcels is in error.
Call out Total Square Footage on seg map.
Each of the four parcels appear to contain five acres or more. The square footage
given for the building on parcel one exceed s the square footage given for the
parcel.
Heading incomplete.
Graphic scale missing.
i Require Engineer's Calculations be submitted.
City Surveyor's comments marked in red on attached print.
When the boundary closes and the distances and bearings are adjusted, the legal
descriptions will be reviewed.
If Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. has any questions with regard to the Surveyor's
comments, they can reach Randy Phelps at 235-2529.
BLUME/AMH:lf RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON-
MAR 131990
Randy Phelps
BUSH,ROED&HITCHINGS INC. genior Engineering Specialist
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
(206)235-2529
Municipal Buil •n9 u l
200 Mill Avenue o� 8055
Renton,Washin \
•
•
•
•
. .
•
•
•
•
. •
•
•
• • -
. .
- •
. • • .• • • .
• .
JOB #1 . BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY -PARCEL SEGREGATION MAP- (BUSH. ROED, HITCH
INGSIINC. ) JN 90-02 DD 90
BEARING ' DIST .
. . PNT NORTHING EASTING TYPE
A: \
, .
COMMAND : • • . ,
•
•
•
•
• •
• • •
•
•
. •
•
•
COMMAND 10-
PNT OCCUPIED= 40
40 6373. 3422 51083. 8208 • OCC
PNT BS= 81-
PNT= 88-
RP= 39
801-57-32r-7 524. 90 39 5848. 7490 E110.,. . 76.30 INVRC
PT= 38
--T' = tZF-'5.18
qD US = 524. 90
RC LENG T H= 194. 06
PNGENT = 98. 15
-10RD = S81.-22-03E 192. 96
NT= 37
70-46-34E�'' 147. 08 ,. 37 6295. 9525 51413. 470 5 INV
NT= 68-
P= 36
19-13-26W 842. 73 36 5500. 2138 .51135. 9929 I NV RC
T= 35
24-46-09E 842. 73 35 6265. 415 2 51489. 0660 INV
ELTA = 05-32-43
AD I US = 842. 73/
RC LENGTH=
ANGENT = 40. 81
HORD = S68-00-13E 81. 53
NT= 34
65-13-51 E 1 259. 10 ✓ 34 6156. 8618 51724. 3296 I N V
NT= 68-
P= 33
24-46-09W 45. 00 33 6116. 0017 517►05. 4763 INVRC
T= 32
65-13-51 E 45. 00 32 6097. 1483 51746. 3364 INV
ELTA = 90-00-00
ADIUS = 45. 00'
RC LENGTH= 70. 69'
ANGE NT = 45. 00
HORD = S20-13-51E 63. 64
NT= 31.
;� _
-'46_� '�W 24. 57 : .L E12174. Ei3B( J 1 l.G„ {[r42 ; INV
44-0/-51E i.80. 00 30 5996. 3015 51898. 00 N'Y lL.
T= 29
39-�39-23W 1 80. 00 2 9 5995.. 2220 51718. 0084 INV
EL TA A = 26-12-46
DIUS = 180. 00
RC LENGTH= 82. 35
NGENT = 41. 91
-10RD = 912-45-46W 81 . 63
NT= 28
210-20-37E -/ 81. 08 28 5914. 1435 51718. 4947 INV
NT= 24
_J/
3 1-2 4-51 E ' 601. 76 24 531 -5667 51733. 3457 INV
'4T= 68-
P= ;25
B8-35-09W 256. 48 . 25 5306. 2370 51476. 9439 INVRC
T= 26
71-24-58E 256. 48 226 5224. 4986 51720. 0505 INV
ELTA = 19-59-53
PD I US = 256. 48
RC LENGTH= 89. 52/
aNGENT = 45. 22
-10RD = S08-35=05W 89. 07 -
SIT= 27
18-35-09W V 286. 89 y/ , 27 4952. 5708 51628. 6115 INV
NT= 3
53-39-22W ✓ 445. 211 3 5218. 4166 51270. 005S INV
SIT= 5
46-16-56W 219. 70 5 5064. 5 04 51111. 168 INV
NT= 6
09-01-55W 125. 00 - 6 4941. 1303 51 091. 5937 INV
NT= 7
48-12-23E 420. 25 7 4E61. 0550 51404. 9112 INV
\,T= 68-
P= 8
i6,59-43W L5i'cl. 37 9 44E._. 9.592: 5._3B1 B1Z 7
:LTA = 57-20-46
aD I US = 250. 37
tC LENGTH= 250. 59
'NGENT = 136. 92
iORD = S05-40—IZ6W 240. 26
FT= 10
56-09-33W H 57. 38 '1 10 4445. 1621 51328. 6969 INV
4T= 68—
D= 11
73-50-27E 1034. 85 11 5391. 7103 51746. 9803 INVRC
r=. 12 _
50-52-26W 1034. 85 12 4738. 6895 50944. 1862 INV
_LTA = 27-01-59 J
aD I US = 1034. 853
;C LENGTH= 488. 26 u
NGENT = 248. 76
-ORD = N52=38-34W 483. 74
4T= 68-
3= 13
50-52-26E 1108. 69 13 5438. 3055 51804. 2623 INVRC
T= 14
36-04-23W .1088. 69 14 4830. 6691 50 900. 92 19 INV
=LTA = 05-11-57
aD I US = 1088. 69j
RC LENGTH= 98. 79
NGENT = 49. 43
-IORD = N25-11-27W 101. 65
\I T.= 15
33-55-36W 776. 20 ` 15 5 71I.. 7G3i 5tiG•67. /L03 I `
1JIV 1 - MJ
Na8-1 1-33W 7 305. 79 `- 1 45 5744. 2358 50323. 2343 I NNV
PNT= 68-
RP= 46 :
N61-48-27E 411. 73 46 5938. 7516 50686. 1188 INVRC
PT= 47
S69-48-28W 411. 73 47 5796. 6344 50299. 6938 INV
DELTA = 08-00-01,/ '
RADIUS = 411. 73
ARC LENGTH= 57. 49/
TANGENT = 28. 79
CHORD = N24-11-33W 57. 44
PNT= 48
N20-11-33W ,/156. 01, - 48 5943. 0558 50245. 8430 ' INV
PNT= 68-
RP= 49
N69-48-27E 523. 68 49 6123. 8173 50737. 3367 INVRC
PT= 50
N64-20-12W 523. 68 50 6350. 6138 5026 5. 3154 INV
DELTA = 45-51-21✓
RADIUS = 523. 68
ARC LENGTH= 419. 12 ,7
TANGENT = 221. 51
CHORD, = NO2-44-07E 408. 02
PNT= 68-
RP= 51
N06-57-18W , 667. 96 51 701 6586 50184. 4322 INVRC
PT= 52
S 15-46-41 E 667. 96 52 6370. 8659 50366. 0584 INV
DELTA = 08-49-23
RADIUS = 667. 96
ARC LENGTH'= 102. 86
TANGEN- = 51. 53
°
. ,
NT� '53
83�41-02E 60. 83 53 6377. 5581 5042G. 5192 7 1YV
N7'= 54
74-13-19E 47. 60 54 639N. 5010 50472. 3257 INV
NT= 68-
P= 55
17-19-03E 238. 99 55 '6618. 6576 50543. 4650 ZNVRC
T= 56
01-56-51E 238. 99 56 6379. 8057 50551. 5868 INV
'
./
�ELTA = 19-15-54
!ADIUS = 238. 99 '
\RC LENGTH= 80. 36
'ANGENT 40. 56
/
�
,HORD = S82-18-54E 79. 98
/NT= 57 ,
J88-03-09E4 470. 931 57 6395. 8096 51022. 2448 INV
3NT= 58 / '
�01-56r51E `/ 10. 00 / 58 6385. 8154 51022. 5846 INV
INT� 40
378-29-13E 62 9c- 40 6373. 3422 51083. 8206 INV
3N -�-7 -~--~~~~-
T- �9�- '
SUM' OF LAT. = 0. 00
SUM OF DEP. = 0. 00
PERIMETER = 6593. 52
FINAL AREA = 1859885 92 SQUARE FEET -
. ~� '
` 42. 6971 ACRES
:OMMAND 2- '
'
'
is
City of Renton
Planning Division
Community Development Department -
Memorandum
Date: February 23, 1990
To: Arneta Henninger
Property Management
From: Lenora Blauman
Senior Planner
Subject: Blume Distribution Company Segregation
Attached is the information you requested for the subdivision of the above-
referenced property:
Project Identification: Blume Distribution Company Segregation (112-89)
Scope of Work: Applicant -seeks to segregate existing 38. 81 acre
property into four parcels (see attached map) . Under
King County and City of Renton regulations such
segregation can be accomplished without a formal sub-
division application because each of the parcels will
contain five acres or more.
Status of Project: All necessary information is on file with the City
(see attached information file). Verification of
accuracy of legal description of total property has
previously been obtained. The applicant now must
receive verification of accuracy of legal description
of four individual lots before implementing
segregation with King County.
Dependent Projects: Blume Distribution -Container Corporation (112-89)
Project Coordinator: Lenora Blauman
Planning Division
Target Date: March 7 , 1990
If you have questions or require further information to clarify the action
requested of you, please contact me at Extension 2550.
64-0 -5.1 E 1 8I0i..0 30 . 5996. 3015 51896. 0052 N`Y
I - G
89-39-23W 180. 00 . 29 5995,. 6. 07.I084 I NV
ELTA = 26-12-46
ADIUS = 180. 00
RC LENGTH= 82. 35
ANGENT = 41. 91
HORD = S12-45-46W 81 . 63
NT= 28
00-20-37E 1 81. 08 28 5914. 1435 51718. 4947 INV
NT= 84 y
01-24-51 E ' 601. 76 24 5312. 5667 51733. 3457 INV
NT= 68-
P= `5
88-35-09W 256. 48 25 5306. 2370, 51476. 9439 INVRC
T= , 26
71-E4-58E 256. 48 26 5224. 4986 51720. 0505 INV
ELTA = 19-59-53/
ADIUS = 256. 48/
RC LENGTH= 89. 52✓
ANGENT = 45. 22
HORD = S08-35-05W 89. 07
NT= 27
18-35-09W / 286. 89/ 27 495`. 5708 51628. 61 15 INV
NT= 3
53-39-22W ✓ 445. 211 3 5216. 4166 51270. 0056 INV
NT= 5 -
46-16-56W v.• 219. 70 5 5064. 5804 51111. `168 INV
NT=
09-01-55W ` 125. 00 6 4941. 13003 510+91. 593.7 INV .
NT= 7
7 4661. 05 50 51404. 9112 I NV
NT= 68-
P=55-39-31E 250. 37 8 451q. 8156 51 61 y . E 395 _NV R
`
66-59-43W 250 5�3 �Q7
. 37 9 44��. 9693 8i. � ��V
, `
ELTA = 57-20-46
ADIUS = 250. 37
RC LENGTH= 250~ 59`
ANGENT = 136. 92
HORD = S05-40_06W 240. 26
,
NT= 10,
66-09-33Wv 57. 38 ' 10 4445. 1621 51328. G9G9 INV
NT= 68-
P= 11
23-50-27E 1034. 85 11 5391. 7103 51746. 9803 INVRC
T= 12
6W 1034. 85 1 4738. 6895 50944" 1862 INV
-
ELTA = 27-01-59
ADIUS - = 1034. 85J '
/
`
RC LENGTH= 488. 26o/
. '
ANGENT. = 246. 76
/
HORD = N52-38-34W 483. 74
NT= 68- '
P= 13 ,
50-52-26E 1108. 6n 13 5438. 3055 51804. 2623 INVRC
T= 14
567-04-23W 1088. 69 14 4830. 6691 50900. 9219 INV
-
/
]
ELTA = 05-11-57 ~
|
ADIUS = 1088. 69u
/
RC LENGTH= 98. 79 �
ANGENT = 49. 43
`
HORD =� N25-11-27W 101 . 65
NT= 15
'
33-55-36W 776. 20 15 5474. 723' 5 0467. 7003
N28-1 V-33W '7 305. 79 v 45 5744. 2358 503`3. 2343 I,HIV
PNT= 68-
RP= 46
N61-48-27E 411. 73 46 5938. 7516 5 0686. 1188 INVRC
PT= :47
S69-48-28W 411. 73 47 5796. 6344 502 99. 6938 INV
DELTA = 08-00-01/
RADIUS = 411. 73 "
ARC LENGTH= 57. 49/
TANGENT = 28. 79
CHORD = N24-11-33W 57. 44
PNT= 48
N20-11-33W ,/156. 01.f 48 5943. 0558 50245. 8430 ' INV
PNT= 68-
RP= 49
N69-48-27E 523. 68 49 6123. 8173 50737. 3367 INVRC
PT= 50
N64-20-12W 523. 68 50 6350. 6138 5 0265. 3.154 INV
DELTA = 45-51-21✓
RADIUS = 523. 68
ARC LENGTH= 419. 12
TANGENT = 221. 51
CHORD = NO2-44-07E 408. 02
PNT= 68-
RP= 51
N06-57-18W / 667. 96 51. 7013. 6586 50 184. 4322 INVRC
PT= 52
S 15-46-41 E 667. 96 52 6370. 8659 50366. 0584 INV
DELTA = 08-49-23
RADIUS = 667. 96
ARC LENGTH= 102. 86
TANGENT = 51. 53
NT- ,S3
83-41-02E 60. 83 53 6377. 5581 50425. 5 EI2 I NV
NT= 54
74-13—i 9E 47. 60 54 6390. 501 00 50.4 i -3257 I NV
,NT= 68—
P= 55
117-19-03E 238. 99 55 6618. 6576 50543..4650 I NV RC
)T= 56
i01-56-51 E 238. 99 56. 6379. 8057 50551 . 5868 INV
)ELTA = 19-15-54
RADIUS = 238. 99 '
IRC LENGTH= 80. 36
TANGENT = 40. 56
:HORD = 588-18-54E 79. 98
PNT= 57
N88-03-09E v' 470. 93J 57 6395. 8096 51022. 2448 INV
PNT= 58 /
SOC 1-56-51 E 10. 00' 58 6385. 8154 51022. 5846 INV
PNT= 4Q�
S78-29-13E 62 49 f` 40 6373. 3422 510c 83. 8206 INV
PNT= 19— R.
SUM OF LAT. = 0. 00
SUM OF DEP. = 0. 00
PERIMETER = 6593. 52
w ! ;
FINAL AREA = 1859885. 92 SQUARE FEET '
42. 6971 ACRES
COMMAND
Imo_'
'' MAR 5 1990
CITY OF RENTON << ,z,
11 '1 S_t d e!.. ._- ,. :s 1,..✓ '
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 5, 1990
TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner ,
FROM: Ron Straka, Storm Water Utility
SUBJECT: Renton Valley Drainage Requirements
The portion of the Green River Valley located within the corporate limits of the City of
Renton, south of I-405 and west of SR. 167, is known as the Renton Valley. This area
had been determined to be a critical drainage basin. The factors which determine if a
basin is a critical drainage basin are the following:
1) Is a Flood Plain located in the basin?
2) Are there wetlands, streams, ponds, lakes, rivers, or closed depression located in
the basin?
•
3) Are the surface water outlets for the basin limited.or non-existent?
All of these factors are present in the Renton Valley. It is located in the Green River
100-year Flood Plain. There are wetlands, streams, ponds, and closed depression located
throughout the Renton Valley. Be definition, a closed depression is a low-lying area
which has no, or a limited, surface water outlet that in most storm events the area acts as
a retention basin, holding water for infiltration into the ground or evaporation into the
air. By their nature, many closed.depressions contain wetlands. The primary surface
water outlet located in the valley is Springbrook Creek. Springbrook Creek flows from
the Renton Watershed, through Kent, the Renton Valley, and into the portion of the P-1
Channel which has been constructed. It then flows to the P-1 Forebay Area and is •
pumped into the Green River. Since Springbrook Creek drains such a large area, its
capacity is limited and it often crests or exceeds its banks during minor storm events.
In summary, the Renton Valley is a critical drainage basin due to the fact that it is a „.-
closed depression with a 100-year flood plain and a limited outlet for surface water flows.
Therefore, stricter drainage requirements are needed to control the surface water flows
generated by new development in the Valley.
The purpose of the stricter drainage requirements is to preserve the City's water course
and to minimize water quality degradation by preventing siltation, sedimentation, and
pollution of creeks, streams, wetlands, and other water bodies. (Per City Code Chapter
22, Title IV of Ordinance No. 4260, Section No. 2) These stricter detention requirements
are intended to protect property owners which are tributary to a proposed development
from increased runoff rates and potential flooding. This will insure safety of roads and.
right-of-ways. It is important to minimize potential for flooding to insure adequate
access to properties and right-of-ways for citizens and emergency services.
Lenora Blauman
March 5, 1990
Page Two
The stricter drainage requirements will insure that surface water exiting a proposed
development's property will have adequate energy dissipation to minimize downstream
damage caused by erosion and_flooding.. The peak discharge from a property may not be
• increased due to'the development of the property.. (Per City Code Chapter 22, Title IV of
Ordinance No. 4260, Section No. 9) Retention/Detention facilities must be provided to
control all surface water in excess of the peak discharge except for properties that are
located contiguous to receiving bodies of water which would adequately handle the
surface water in excess of the peak discharge. Since the Renton Valley has a limited
outlet for surface water flows and Springbrook Creek has limited capacity, we must
enforce stricter drainage requirements.
All storm drainage design and calculations shall conform to the King County Surface -
Water Design Manual. (Per City Code Chapter 22, Title IV of Ordinance No. 4260,
Section No. 15) The stricter drainage requirements follow this manual's recommendation
for the control of surface water in a closed depression.
REN-VALY/RJS:lf
W
•
41 - CITY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division
March 5, 1990
Jim Garrison
146 North Canal Street, Suite 310
Seattle, WA 98103
Re: BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
File #ECF;SA-112-89
Dear Mr. Garrison:
This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform
you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above
referenced project. The Committee on February 28, 1990 decided that your project may be
issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions:
Natural Environment 1) That the applicant provide a revised
wetland landscaping plan, to include a greater
number, size and diversity of native wetland
plants, subject to approval by the City, by the
Department of Ecology and by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, in advance of site plan
review.
Earth: . 2) That the applicant provide a statement
agreeing to limit filling operations on the site
to a maximum of.99 acres of the wetland and
an approved amount of dryland fill, using fill
material approved by the City, as well as fill
methods/monitoring systems approved by the
City and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in
advance of the issuance of site
preparation/building permits. (Note: The
wetland fill plan has been approved by the
Department of Ecology).
Traffic: 3) That the applicant directly provide regional
traffic improvements as stipulated by the
Transportation Systems Division or make a
voluntary contribution to the Grady Way TBZ
in the amount of$254,345.65 ($185.00 per
trip).
Note: The applicant will also need to provide an off-site improvements plan, including
streetlighting, curbs, sidewalks, gutters and undergrounding of utility lines, subject to the
approval of the Public Works Department. (See "Note #B below)
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550
Traffic: 4) That the applicant provide a TMP,
including carpooling/vanpooling, preferred
parking, pedestrian linkages to adjacent
Oakesdale Avenue, subject to the approval of
METRO and the Transportation Systems
Division.
Traffic: 5) That the applicant provide an
ingress/egress plan (e.g. driveway location,
dimensions and design) as required by "Access
Management to Streets and Highways" or
"ITE Transportation and Land Development
Standards" or as recommended by a licensed
transportation engineer in order to ensure
safe, efficient access for large trucks hauling
products from the site to the adjacent heavily-
traveled Oakesdale Avenue.
(Note #1: All traffic mitigation plans [Conditions #3 through #5, inclusive] must be
approved and fees (if established) paid in advance of the issuance of site
preparation/building permits for the development.)
(Note #2: The development will generate additional traffic [estimated at 83 trips per day]
to the nearby intersection of Martin Luther King Way and 68th Street,where level of
service "E" already exists. Because this intersection is under the jurisdiction of King
County, the City will notify County officials. The applicant may be called upon by the
County to participate in signal warrants at that intersection; the applicant has been so
advised.)
(Note #3: The Washington State Department of Transportation may call for additional
mitigation measures if more than 10 trips occur on any state highway during p.m.peak
hours during construction or operations).
Storm Water: 6).That the applicant:
a) provide a revised site plan which elevates
all structures a minimum of two (2) feet above
the defined floodplain elevation of nineteen
(19) feet; OR, b) provide secondary
containment for all structures to minimize
leakage of damaged products (e.g. from fire
or flood) to protect the underlying terrain
against contamination, over the life of the
project; OR c) provide a "hold harmless"
agreement ensuring that the municipality will
not be responsible for any damage occurring
to the site or developments thereupon
resulting from flooding on the property. Plans
and/or agreements shall be subject to the
approval of the Fire Prevention Bureau and
the Public Works Department (agreements
shall also be approved by the City Attorney),
and shall be provided in advance of the
issuance of site preparation/building permits.
Storm Water: 7) That the applicant shall provide a storm
water drainage management plan, in advance
of the issuance of site preparation/building
permits, subject to approval of the Public
Works Department, including: a) on-site
detention with 100 year/7 day design (with
n pfts vid a
supplementarydesigseci ica soilsion engineeringprodein report) (*);
b) Type II catch basins with baffled oil/water
separators; and c) biofiltration swales for
storm water prior to entrance into the
wetlands (fire lanes adjacent to wetlands will
require adequate biofiltering buffer strips).
(*) There is an approved Soils Engineering Report on file, but because staff is
recommending a 100 year/7 day design system, rather than the customarily required 25
year/2 day design system, owing to site characteristics -- e.g. elevations,wetlands -- the
Report will need to be modified with respect to design specifications prior to the issuance
of building permits.
Construction/Noise
Light/Glare/Traffic 8) That the applicant provide a construction
mitigation plan including the following
components: a) an erosion control plan; b) a
plan for protection of the wetland area to be
retained while the area to be eliminated is
being filled; c) a plan for wheel-washing of all
construction vehicles prior to leaving the site;
d) water down the site periodically to control
dust and debris; e) a plan for restriction of
hauling routes and hours of hauling
operations; f) a plan for signage of site and
structures during construction to facilitate
emergency service provision; and g) a
$5,000.00 cash bond for street clean-up.
In addition the City requests:
Recreation: 1) That the applicant make a voluntary
contribution in the amount of$5,000.00 to the
development of the Master Trails Plan in the
area of the site.
2) That the applicant provide a recorded
easement to establish a connection from the
site to the proposed adjacent Master Trail, for
use by project employees, subject to approval
by the Landscape Planner and the Parks and
Recreation Department.
Note #A: Modifications to the site plan (architectural design), the exterior illumination
plan, on-site recreation plan and dryland landscaping plan (increased plantings; thematic
integrity) and landscaping maintenance bond will be required in conjunction with site plan
review.
Note #B: Specific plans/specifications for on-site and off-site improvements, in
compliance with Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, Public Works Standards (Storm
Water, Traffic, Water Flow and Fire Flow) and related regulations, will be required at the
time of site preparation/building permit application.
Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures
rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day
comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions
or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's
decision. The comment period will end March 20, 1990. Following the end of the
comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require
a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required
fourteen (14) day appeal period.
Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g. the Public
Works Department) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific
mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This
information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable
you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so.
In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative
public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary.
If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above please call Lenora Blauman of
our office at 235-2550.
e Environm /a • mmittee,
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Chief, Current Planning
DKE:mr
cc: Sid W. Eland, Jr.
6000 6th Avenue South
P.O. Box 80187
Seattle, WA 98108
Roger A. Grove
6000 6th Avenue South
P.O. Box 80187
Seattle, WA 98108
F
CITY OF RENTON •
200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH
RENTON, WA 98055
206-235-2501 FAX# 235-2513
DATE qi /90
PAGES (EXCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET)
ATTENTION: i i ��,-� � , v\ C(-0 33 - (0E53)
wrne._ �1 s ,off t 07)
FROM: rovw� ll��a_ui vt__av\
LANCE MUELLER ���� .._.E ©IF MQkR611111fQEL
ASSOCIATES/ARCHITEC.
130 Lakeside Suite 250
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122
DATE V .t .10E NO.
(206) 325-2553 ATTEN D ®zeit 5'hixj
J/ I P ��c.�,,T/�GZ P*9 RE:
TO 6-0/0n
WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop drawings 0 Prints ❑ Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
PL .IVR/1 ,0:!v;Siiiid
CITY OF RENTOt
JAN 7 nr,eoC ,
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval
For your use 0 Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
jiAs requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment 0
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO Q1.4� �� ,. A
SIGNED%����� �f� "�rQ/l/
I•�.. 1--..��.. --- ww* -- ww1�A 4lwAlu ww*3l.. ..� .A nn..s
%ki _ CITY OF RENTON
114
ZV COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division
March 5, 1990
Washington State
Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
Mail Stop PV-11
Olympia, WA 98504
Re: Environmental Determinations
Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental
Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on February
28, 1990:
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
SUNSET GARDENS
ECF;SA-006-90
Applicant seeks site plan approval for 60 unit multi-family residential complex on vacant
site zoned for R-3 use. The property is located at 909-915 Sunset
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
LECF;SA-112-89
The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a warehouse/office complex, including
two structures, parking and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is a
wetland on the site -- .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the remainder will be
enhanced with native vegetation. The 16 acre project site is vacant and is zoned for
manufacturing park use. The property is located at 601 Monster Road
The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on March 20, 1990.
Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless
comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination,
there is a required 14 day appeal period.
If you have questions, please call Lenora Blauman or me at 235-2550.
For the Environmental Review Committee,
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE:mr
cc: Mr. Craig Larson, King County Planning Division
Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro
Department of Wildlife
Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries
Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation
Ms. Connie Corpuz, City of Seattle
Muckleshoot Tribal Council
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550
•
faL)
•
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMTI'IEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-
Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton
Municipal Code.
BLUME DISTRIBUTION FACILITY
ECF;SA-112-89
The applicant seeks to obtain site plan approval for a warehouse/office complex, including
two structures, parking and service areas, landscaping and recreational amenities. There is
a wetland on the site -- .99 acre portion is proposed to be filled and the remainder will be
enhanced with native vegetation. 'The 16 acre project site is vacant and is zoned for
manufacturing park use. The property is located at 601 Monster Road
This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m.,
March 20, 1990 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence
following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of
Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at'the Current Planning Division
of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington
98055,. Phone: 235-2550.
Published: March 5, 1990
Account#51067