Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA89-030BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE 6ittr S ( ciJ 3Oda,W Y- 1 CAG-110-90 AGREEMENT FOR ADVANCED DEPOSIT OF LID FUNDS GSA/FAA Property, 1601 Lind Ave. S.W. ) The Austin Company, a C k i, corporation hereafter "Austin") and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Washington (hereafter City") , agree as follows: 1. In fulfillment of the requirements described in Ordinance No. 4283, Austin has already paid impact fees in the amount of $91,540 for development of the GSA/FAA property at 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (hereafter "Property") . For the payment of assessments which might be imposed by the City against the Property in the future under LID No. 1 of the Valley Transportation Program, Austin agrees to pay the City upon execution of this agreement the amount of $65, 243 which is currently estimated by the City to be the amount of assessments attributable to the Property. 2 . The City agrees to deposit such funds in an account designated as LID No. 1 escrow funds to be applied against any future assessments made by the City under LID No. 1 against the Property. Interest which accrues on such funds in the interim may also be used, if necessary, to pay the assessments attributable to the Property. 3 . Austin shall retain all rights to contest the amount of the actual LID assessment against the Property in accordance with applicable state law as if Austin were still the owner of the Property. 4. In the event that LID No. 1 is not formed within six years, the deposited funds with all accrued interest (at the rate of 10% per annum) shall be returned to Austin (and not to the then record owner of the Property) . 5. In the event that LID No. 1 is formed and final assessments are imposed (after exhaustion of any appeal rights in Austin) which exceed the amount of the deposited funds plus accrued interest, the City shall request of Austin and Austin shall pay the difference within thirty days. 6. Austin's obligations under this agreement are limited to the assessments for LID No. 1 as described in Ordinance No. 4283 , including the delineation of improvements to be funded, the method of allocating funds between impact fees and LID assessments and such other conditions and restrictions as-are described in Ordinance No. 4283. Austin shall not be obligated to pay for improvements under any other LID or any other City ordinance which may be passed in the future by the City relating to transportation improvements benefiting the Property. KEEGJ\00419.AGM/10.10.90 Seattle W . ..x z'r y31.jrka. uY nr• 7 . The parties agree that the payments made by Austin pursuant to this agreement fully satisfy the requirements of ptdinance No. 4283 for the Property. Y,., 8. In the event of any refund by the City of all or part 4-of the impact fees or LID payments made by Austin for the iT Property, such refunds shall be paid to Austin. ff:. THE AUSTIN COMPANY Date: 7i 1?, , CITY OF RENTON Date: /Z // By r ayo A TEST: STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF King cit ' kspc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Paul S. Chiado. is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged he is a Vice President of The Austin Company and has the authority to sign the instrument for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated:' i-J 3' /P 7--7- ` . 9liczz. Donna J . Tr son, Notary Pub in and for the State of Washington My appointment expires September 15, 1994 KEEG3\00419.AGM/10.10.90 2S.attl• THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. RENTON, WA 98055 COMPANY PHONE: 206/226.8800 TELECOPIER: 206/228-5471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223-01 AU-ST-IC-T377N3 PLANNING DIVISION August 20, 1990 CITY OF RENTON AUG 2 3 1990 Mr. Donald K. Erickson RECEIVED Zoning Administration City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Subject: GSA/FAA Office Building 1001 Lind Avenue S.W. Austin W.O. #89-5477 Reference: Transportation Management Plan Reference ECF:SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Erickson: Pursuant to the requirements to provide a Transportation Management Plan TMP) for the above referenced project, we herewith submit the attached plan. The Austin Company has complied with, and is providing all items set forth in this TMP, under "developer." The FAA is aggressively pursuing the tenants of the TMP and is making marked progress toward reaching their goal . Metro is working very closely with FAA to maximize participation in HOV programs and recently has created three (3) new custom bus services for FAA/Boeing sites. The attached plan has been presented to Metro for review and Carol Thompson has indicated her approval of the TMP. If you require additional information, please notify me at the above number. Very tr Wyour , Robert G. de Project Coordinator RGS/taj Attachment cc: Lynn A. Guttman, Planning, Building, Public Works Administration Mel Wilson, P.E. , Director of Transportation TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN for the FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. Renton, Washington 98055 July 20, 1990 A. GOAL: The goal of this Transportation Management Plan (TMP) for the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Northwest Mountain Regional Headquarters and Seattle Field Offices is to decrease the percentage of FAA employees who commute to and from work in single occupancy vehicles SOV) , particularly at peak hours (7:00 - 8:00 a.m. and 3:30 - 4:30 p.m.) . B. BACKGROUND: This project will provide a five-story building of approximately 173,000 square feet and will house approximately 1,100 employees of the FAA. This building will be the home for the FAA's Northwest Mountain Regional Headquarters and nine area field offices and facilities. It is located in the valley area of Renton, Washington, King County and is bordered by S.W. 16th Street and Raymond Avenue. Two transit routes provide transit service past the project site on Lind Avenue. Route 163 travels along the Benson Road corridor on East Hill, runs to and through the Renton valley via Carr Road and Lind Avenue, then travels on to downtown Seattle. Route 247 starts at the Redmond Park'and Ride lot; stopping at the Overlake, Eastgate, and 112th Street S.E. Park and Ride lots. It then circulates through the Renton valley via Lind Avenue to the Kent Space Center. Current City Code provides for 785 parking slots on the property. With 1,100 employees expected initially to be on site, 325 personnel, or 30% will not have an individual parking slot available for their use. Added to that is a reduction of about 100 spaces, which will be used for visitor and Government car parking. This leaves 425 personnel or over one-third of our work force without individual parking availability. This will be mitigated somewhat by the number of personnel on travel or leave daily. We commissioned Metro to do a survey at our current Regional Headquarter's site at Sea-Tac Towers. Our SOV rate is 73% with the other 27% commuting by some other method, primarily by high occupancy vehicle HOV) modes, such as carpools and public transportation. SOV commuting at our field facilities is much higher, about 96%, because there are no parking restrictions at these sites. TARGETED PARTICIPATION PERCENTAGE: The target for HOV participation is 40%. This is based on a study requested by the building contractor, The Austin Company, and conducted by The Transpo Group, a transportation and traffic engineering consultant. We will have to increase our HOV participation rate by 13% over our current Regional Headquarter's rate in order to achieve this target. This is an extremely high target--one that exceeds any of the large office complexes we are aware of in the immediate area. 0 2 Additional transportation services and consolidation of offices should add to the potential HOV pool. We have already established over 30 carpools and worked with Metro to establish three express custom bus routes to begin on the first day of our phased move-in. RESPONSIBILITIES OF AFFECTED PARTIES: Developer: The Austin Company will provide a: 1. Bus stop on Lind Avenue, with a concrete footing for the future installation of a bus shelter. (Contact Metro Facilities Planning on 684-1597) . 2. Commuter Information Center in the building lobby located and built to Metro specifications. (Contact Metro at 684-2692 for assistance.) 3. Secure bicycle rack at the site. Metro: Metro will provide: 1. A bus shelter at the bus stop on Lind Avenue when ridership warrants. 2. Information and promotional"materials for the Information Center, such as bus schedules, ride sharing, etc. 3. Marketing support and counsel to initiate and maintain the effort. 4. Vans as needed for van pools. 5. Research on the feasibility of additional bus routes in the area. 6. A determination on the demand for custom buses to the area and provision of these buses when demand is sufficient. 7. Interface between FAA and other adjacent building tenants primarily Boeing) and include them in the above efforts. 8. Ridematch services. FAA: The FAA will: 1. Appoint a transportation coordinator(s) who will: a. be responsible for managing the implementation of this TMP; b. issue car/van pool parking authorizations; c. establish and maintain a computer information center, including bus pass sales and the ridematch program applications; 3 d. in coordination with Metro, conduct informational/promotional sessions; e. issue newsletters, utilize "Intercom" , etc. to promote Metro services, provide information on benefits of using HOV transportation. f. conduct an annual survey and evaluation of the program and submit to the City of Renton. 2. Provide preferential parking for car and van pools in the closest proximity to the building. 3. Maintain a commuter information center with pertinent flyers, schedules, applications, etc. needed to promote and provide information relevant to this TMP and the accomplishment of its goals. 4. Permit open flex-time around designated core hours and in coordination with their supervisor in order to encourage arriving and departing from work at least one-half hour before or after peak hours. 5. Encourage management to schedule meetings with car/vanpools in mind so they don't cause their employees to have to drive in separately or cause them to miss their car/vanpool at the end of the day because of a late meeting. City: The City of Renton will: 1. Monitor compliance with the TMP. ap 0 CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division November 21, 1989 Ms. Carol Thompson METRO Exchange Building 821 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: GSA/FAA Building, Lind Avenue at S.W. 16th Street,SA 030-89) Dear Ms. Thompson: Thank you for providing us with the opportunity to comment on theproposedTMPfortheabove-referenced project. We do haveseveralideasandquestionswpicharedescribedbelow. To begin, we would hope that public transit service can beimprovedduringpeakhoursofoperationimmediatelyuponoccupancyofthisdevelopment. Will it be possible for METRO toprovidesuchimprovementsinthenearfuture? In Paragraph B. 3 . of the Plan, reference is made to the provisionof775parkingspacesfor1050employees, and to a "reduction ofabout100spacesforvisitorandgovernmentvehicles. " In fact,the reduction of 100 may be excessive since government cars willbeinuse (and, thus out of the parking lot) for a substantialportionoftheday, leaving those parking stalls available forvisitors. It appears that a reduction of 50 - 60 spaces would beamoreaccurateestimate. In Paragraph D. 1 reference is made to a bus shelter. Staffsupportabusshelter, and suggest that it be a "double module"owing to the large potential group of users at this site. In Paragraph D. 4 reference is made to the provision of vanpoolservice, but there is no information identifying the provider ofthevansandnoindicationastowhetherthosevanswillbesubsidized -- or the provider of the subsidy. This informationshould, in our opinion, be a part of the TMP agreement. In Paragraph D. 4 reference is made to research concerningfeasibilityofadditionalbusroutesinthearea. We would liketoseetheresearchactivitiesextendedtoincludethefeasibilityofmorefrequentserviceonexistingroutesalso. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 Ms. Carol Thompsor November 21, 1989 Page 2 In the information provided concerning FAA responsibilities for TMP activities, no mention is made of charging parking fees for SOV's (to encourage ridesharing) , nor of offering subsidized bus passes. Is it feasible to charge such fees, and, perhaps, to utilize funds generated to subsidize bus passes? This should also be addressed in the plan. With the suggested modifications, it appears that the proposed TMP provides an excellent opportunity to significantly reduce traffic impacts to the site and the surrounding community. We look forward to receiving the final TMP for the GSA/FAA building. We appreciate your considera ' on. Sincerel Don Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:LB:dm PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE AUG 2 2 1990LAWOFFICES 2600 CENTURY SQUARE • 150I FOURTH AVENUE • SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101-1688 FIECEIVED 206)622-3150 JOHN E. KEEGAN 206)628-7688 August 20, 1990 Mr. Donald L. Erickson Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: GSA/FAA Office Building (Project ECF-SA-030-89) Dear Mr. Erickson: This will confirm that, at the Environmental Review Committee of August 15, the Committee determined that The Austin Company GSA/FAA office building qualifies in all respects for the transportation mitigation provided under Ordinance No. 4283, passed by the City Council on August 6. This means that The Austin Company will be required to pay an impact fee of $46 per square foot of building space for office development (199, 000 square feet x $.46 = $91, 540) . This amount has been paid bychecktotheCityofRentononAugust2, 1990. In addition, The Austin Company (and its successors) will be required to sign a petition to form LID No. 1 under such ordinance and to pay the assessments arising out of such LID. Thank you for your willingness to reconsider this issue. Sincerely yours, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE yE . Kit, Joeegan JEK: jah cc: Paul Chiado Lenore Blauman, City of Renton KEEGJ\00366.D20 Seattle FAx: (206)628-704o • TELEX: 328919 DWJ SEA ANCHORAGE, ALASKA ' BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON ' Los ANGELES, CALIFORNIA PORTLAND, OREGON • RICHLAND,WASHINGTON • WASHINGTON, D.C. rim TONCIT'5 OF REN a ' b.ir Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator August 7, 1990 Robert Snyder Project Coordinator The Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: GSA Building, 1601 Lind Avenue S.W., SA 030-89 Dear Mr. Snyder: This letter is written in response to your request for Environmental Review Committee reconsideration of the traffic mitigation plan established for the above-referenced project. Under SEPA Rules and City of Renton regulations, an environmental determination may be reconsidered during the established comment period and appeal period for a project. As you are aware the comment/appeal period for the GSA/FAA building expired in July, 1989. City staff, the Environmental Review Committee and City Attorney, Lawrence Warren, have reviewed your request and have determined that there is no regulation/guideline which now permits revisiting of the environmental determination. The City is presently re-evaluating the policies established for traffic mitigation generally, and the Valley Benefit Zone, specifically. Findings from these studies may include restructuring of fee-setting systems. If these findings affect your contribution to the Benefit Zone, you will be duly notified; however, for the present, you will be required to provide fees mandated by the Environmental Review Committee on June 7, 1989. No changes are anticipated to the L.I.D., and, therefore, those fees must be provided to the City as well. If you have questions or would like additional information, please contact me at 235-2550. r t Environmentaliv' w 4eitti • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cc: Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Lawrence Warren, City Attorney 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 J THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. RENTON, WA 98055 COMPANY PHONE: 206/226-8800 TELECOPIER 206/228-5471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223-01 AU-ST-IC-T377N3 August 2, 1990 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON Mr. Donald L. Erickson AUG - 2 1990 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton RECEIVED 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: GSA/FAA Office Building 1001 Lind Avenue S.W. Austin W.O. #89-5477 Reference: Project ECF-SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Erickson: Pursuant to the implementation of the Valley Transportation Plan, The Austin Company hereby requests the ERC consider amendment of wording found in its determination for project ECF-SA-030-89, Item 3(a) , "Assessment for Burlington Industrial Park Benefit Zone $560,465.00; Transportation Benefit Zone Assessment Fee 2845 trips generated at $197.00. " We request this be modified to reflect the current Valley Plan Assessment of $.46/square foot for development of an office building plus participation in LID 1 . Request has been presented to Larry Warren, City Attorney, concerning this matter and he has indicated he has no problem with considering this project for assessment using this method. We appreciate your help in this matter. Vztr 1y ours, Robert G. Snyder Project Coordinator RGS/taj cc: Larry Warren, City Attorney Lynn Guttman, Director of Public Works Ron Nelson, Building Official John Keegan RECEIVED AUG - 2 1990 BUILDING DIVISION sh 0160 —4516143 SERUICE DEUELOP.TO: CITY OF RENTON NOU 9, 1989 4: 10PM #008 P.01 NCI 3 J F7' -• 6,2, 21„).41,;,n1Qy 011 bifilvfnwoMo64 1 EENTOI'4 o cr;D NOV I 3 1989 iti;) wc,` 7-•• , • , 3C " -3 - 21, If , .), ,!-:.)Ii•ti0" if 1: 9 1)J1 t. ii),•vis- 1/11; 0"-• 1 i zamoor 1,2 72-/MWOMM 1,12 * (- I 5E) FROM:METRO SERVICE DEVELOP.To: CITY OF RENTON NOV 9, 1989 4:11PM 14008 P.02 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. i Seattle,WA 98104-1598 November 9, 1989 Roger Bair Federal Aviation Administration 17900 Pacific Highway South Cw68966 Seattle, Washington 98168 Ltteftion2 P,HM-51 sUB,J CT: : t F'mP for FAA 8 ilc it ex in Ren (7 t Dear. Roger: sr A".:t<ched is a revised draft of the TMP. Most of t , . revisions are Y. rc irclarification. I ,u r1elet: the fifth Nkra graph cn page 1 r raliy belongs in a cover letter rather than the 7'MP, Ico sent a copy to Lenore Baulman at City of Renton becauseL- ':r_?bJ`i.Oei to review it in draft form. Once all the Yavisjons area;_'e cA •, will Bend a letter of support from Metro ,o the City T:. 'c I_ C Wv questions, please give me a call at ;o r. 1.10. r.7` 4! y-,1. 4J a rf11 Tpr of Y-C. Devel c)pment Planner C:.T j k tj.nkn Waxda S'?stri_l YY r FROM METRO SERVICE DEUELOP.TO: CITY OF RENTON NOU 9, 1989 4:11PM #008 P:03 4-•:-F s-I TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN for the FEDERAL AVIATION AbMINISTRATION BUILDING 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. Renton, Washington 98056 aurisdiotion File # ECYLSA,7030-4.9 A:.. 'A. GOAL: The goal of this Transportation Management Plan (TMP) r5fortheFederalAviationAdministration's (FAA) NorthwestMountainRegionalHeadquartersandSeattleFieldOfficesis to decrease the percentage of FAA employees who commute to andfromworkworkinsingleoccupancyvehicles ($OV) , particularly atpeakhours (7: 00 - 8:00 a.m. and 3:30 - 4:30 p.m. ) . 1 .'B. BACKGROUND: This project will provide a five-story buildingce7approximately171, 000 square feet and will houseapproximately1, 050 employees of the FAA. This building willbe, the home for the FAA's Northwest Mountain RegionalUnadquartereandnineareafieldofficesandfacillies. ItielocatedinthevalleyareaofRenton, Washingeen, Kingeeene7andisborderedbyS.W. 16th Street and Reymor0 Avenue. Deo transit routes provide hourly service past tl,n. projectej,ee on Lind Avenue. Route 163 travels along the Henson RoadceeeidoronEastHill, runs to and through the ReWeon valleyviaCarrRoadandLindAvenue, then travels on to downtown eeSeettle. Route 247 starts at Redmond Park and Ride lot, stopseetheOverlake, Eastgate, and 112th Street S.E . Park and , e;lde lot and it then circulates through the. Renton valleyviahindAvenuetotheKentSpecieCenter. Currant City Code provides for 775 parking oi ,A0 on theproperty. With 1, 050 employees expected initially to be onsite, 27e personnel, or over 25%, will, not have an individualparkingslotavailablefortheiruse. Added to that is areductionofeeeeut100spaces, which will be used fer visitorandgovernment, car parking. This leaves 375 personnel, orover35%, wite -et parking availability. niel- '= e 'we commissioned Metro to do a b, )1 A,t our current RegionalHeadeualeter's site at Sea-Tac Towers. Our single occupancyvehiclerateis73% with the other 27% f.:cmmntil]!g by some othermethod, primarily by HOV modes such as cerpools.Soycommutingatourfieldfacilitiesismuchhigher, about 96%, ebecausetherearenoparkingrestrictionsatthesesites. C. TARGETED PARTICIPATION PERCENTAGE:The target for HOVparticipationwillbe60% according to a study requested bythebuildingcontractor, The Austin Company, and conducted byTheTranspoCroup, a transportation and traffic engineering toconsultant. We would need to reduce our SOV rate to about 60% 1 i P, FROM:METRO SERU I CE DEUELOP TO: C ITY OF RENTON NOU -9, 1989 4: 12PM 14008 P.04 r• tc meet the demand of r O5O employees. Although1:11611-: u c our current Regional Elchievable becauee uavere than now, SOV 71 Mc,c, for the Metro H.•4cated 1r0 at when ation 7. Intain the 1,• NOU 9, 1989 4: 12PM #028--.P..-12-5,FROM METRO SERUICE DEUELOP.TO: •CITY OF RENTON FW The, FAA will: 1. .r.,pptiint an 121mp1oy,3e, Y.)colAinator(s) (ETC) 4ho tilitp1q-1.1ccic.-1tation of t0.10 TMP b. isue car/vannool nutlY:,rizationr eg.'tablieth i_dematch cippnclatlon3 in ooDreinat.J.on w.1_11f:a wo-Aotiona at etc. to Nstrr.:. on 1.)eneZits ufLilwj eq-;3-11UCIt a:72, ricnr413,::1:1, > 1.4 lt(7, Z17, •. f the 1 . fc.r in the 7 V prOxini.i.7.17 to tnr, `1:1 •.1i:1_ding-. 0.onliTmer inent applicat:Ionse promoteinfoh-mation And the ts goaLl. In th(-..1,. ?AA I- 1c.71::.-4-,41(znod and in to F.1d „4,,,:rzwArtinc4 7. 7-tast one- cr mczaagemt with oax./vaT:9o010 in :,!.nc.1 t7,10 theT cf,or"c. empioyees Lo to misstbj' 4.71.ri7anpccl czt erc.1, 1-,,,ay77:Aci.::, of a late dtz Citk.! off 44 40. CITY OF RENTON N LL HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman September 6, 1989 Robert Snyder The Austin Company 800 SW 16th Renton, WA 98055 RE: The Austin Co./GSA File No. SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Snyder:, The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which waspublishedAugust17, 1989 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, 1Z1Y614—ir FRED J. XAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk cc: 104ty Clerk Building Division Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County, of King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 17th day of August 1989 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /7 t day of A U G 1989 Jlur" Notary Public in and for/ the State of Washington, residing at --k?&4'J`i`d /L/ therein. Application, Petition, or Case #:THE AUSTIN COMPANY (GSA Building) SA-030-89 The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) August 17, 1989 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: THE AUSTIN COMPANY Site Approval File No: SA-030-89 LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval for a five story, 199,000 square foot office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in an Office Park zone. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on August 1, 1989 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on August 8, 1989 at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Site Plan Exhibit #4 - Elevation Plan Exhibit #5 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #6 - Grading Plan Exhibit #7 (a) - Sample of Dryvit Stucco b) - Dryvit Stucco (Panzer) Exhibit #8 - List of projects that have used Dryvit stucco. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Senior Planner, Lenora Blauman. She noted in her review that the total space in the building will be 199,000 square feet of which only177,000 is leasable. Of that 177,000 sq. ft., 155,000 sq. ft. will be used as office space with the remainder to be used for storage and warehousing. The floor plan of the building can be modified for present or future tenants. At present GSA has a 10 year lease on the space, with a 10 year extension. Inside and outside amenities were referenced such as a cafeteria, lounge, outdoor seating space, pedestrian trails, and drop-off center for carpooling. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance, mitigated with a number of conditions (see attachment). Continuing, Ms. Blauman reviewed the criteria to be considered for Site Plan approval stating the application conforms to the Comprehensive Plan's goals and policies; is compatible with adjacent land uses; the property surrounds a Puget Power substation; the application conforms with development standards for the O-P zone as well as the Landscaping and Parking and Loading Ordinances. The city requires 853 parking spaces and the ERC determined that at this time the applicant will provide 770 The Austin Company SA-030-89 August 17, 1989 Page 2 spaces with the remainder of the spaces held in reserve. The applicant is working with Metro and staff to put together the measures to implement the Transportation Management Plan to assist in their efforts to reduce traffic impacts to the city's roadways; some of the parking spaces will be used for visitor and employee use. Earth and water protection were reviewed with the note that the site is a fill site in an area where wetlands exist, and an area that could be subject to flooding. Due to the sensitivity of the site and adjacent lands the development of a Storm Drainage Management System is considered important - the applicant has agreed to provide bio-filtration outside the detention area. Reviewing c aesthetics, Ms. Blauman said staff believes the architectural design suggested is compatible with surrounding industrial developments; at first it was staffs suggestion that Dryvit stucco be replaced with a more attractive and durable material but after a further review of the material it is felt that standard stucco material should be used on the first floor of the building (due to its durability) due to the possibility of vehicles backing into or parking against the material at the base of the building. Landscaped planters around the building were also suggested to,prevent vehicle accidents and damage to first floor materials - but staff gave approval to the use of Dryvit stucco being used on floors above the first floor. The landscape plan is compatible with that of other properties in the area and will enhance wildlife on the site and will also help to mitigate possible light and glare from traffic in and around the site; there will be exterior courtyards, a lighting plan for safety and attractiveness, with parking areas being fully illuminated, and proposed lighting will be pedestrian scaled. Environmental Health aspects considered by staff covered the voltage level produced by the power plant and in conversations with Puget Power they said they have no plans to increase the current voltage. Area-wide property values will not be impacted by this proposal. Regarding pedestrian and vehicle circulation it is estimated there will be approximately 1,050 employees on this site with a possible 2845 daily vehicle trips generated; an on-site vehicle circulation system will also include bicycle parking areas; there will be a minimum of noise and dust during construction and these impacts will be mitigated by the conditions imposed by the ERC. On-site noise is not anticipated to be any greater than that of any office building; there will be no outdoor storage permitted; utility lines are available to serve the site and a storm drainage system will be worked out with staff; indoor and outdoor recreation is provided (with a park located approximately one mile from the site) as well as bike trails. Neighborhood deterioration and blight are not anticipated with the landscaping plan provided for the site. Planner Blauman stated staff recommends approval of this Site Plan proposal with the recommendation that the applicant abide by the conditions set out by the ERC, provide a plan for exterior materials to be used, and provide a landscaping performance bond for $3,000.00 for a period of three years. Testifying for the city's Storm Water Utility Department was Kim Scattarelli who stated part of this site is within the 100 year flood plain which would require the first floor elevation of the building to be above the 100 year flood plain. There will be approximately 18,000 cubic yards of fill added to the site, and certain criteria must be followed regarding drainage on the site with respect to the on-site detention and release rate for the site. Responding for the Traffic Engineering Department of the city was Clint Morgan. The Examiner asked for his comments regarding the intersections of Grady Way and Rainier Avenue and 43rd and Lind Avenue. Mr. Morgan spoke to the concerns of his department regarding the location of the bus stop infrontoftherightturndrop-off lane and the bus shelter. With the amount of traffic coming across to the intersection he feels the location should be changed for safety reasons. He said the bus stop would be acceptable if there was a bus turn-out lane provided; indicated street lighting plans for SW 16th are needed as part of the off-site improvements; channelization of the two-way left turn on Lind Avenue and design standards have changed so much he wants to work with the applicant to upgrade their plan. Mr. Morgan requested the applicant initiate undergrounding of power and communication lines on SW 16th; expressed concern about the combining of two driveways into one with an agreement between Boeing and Austin Company. He said there have been complaints that some vehicles are using this site's open aisle driveways as a short cut from other employment sources to avoid the traffic signal at SW 16th and Lind and consideration should be given to recommendations to discourage this type of movement. As to closing the driveway off on Lind Avenue, Mr. Morgan said this would probably not be practical but possibly speed bumps could be used to slow traffic. Responding for the applicant was Robert Snyder, Austin Company, 800 SW 16th, Renton 98055. Mr. Snyder addressed the storm drainage issue stating the site was previously filled in 1979 and 1980 bringing it to a compatible elevation with surrounding areas and placing it above any flood plain as listed in FEMA. The average elevation on the site is approximately 18 ft. which is 2 ft. above the flood plain in the area. The building is to be 21.9 ft. which is more than 5 ft. above the projected elevation plain of 16 ft.. He said the entire site will be higher than the flood plain with an average of 18-1/2 - 19'; the road improvement plan for SW 16th Street shows the road elevation raised to be compatible with the site. He said the bus stop proposed by Metro is to be located as close as possible to the intersection of Lind and SW 16th and it was Metro's request that there not be a turn-out for busses as they felt the duration for bus stops is only seconds and to get back into traffic is a safety problem. Austin Company will provide a pad for a bus shelter and Metro will provide the shelteritself; the applicant is working with the owner of the adjacent property (Valley Office) to investigate a The Austin Company SA-030-89 August 17, 1989 Page 3 possible joint-use driveway; the Lind Avenue drive is important for circulation and access for fire and emergency vehicles as the new fire station will be located immediately south of this site. Mr. Snyder continued stating the applicant is working closely with the Public Works Department in seeking a solution to bio-filtration which is a new requirement for projects in this area (this is a new science dealing with the use of grass swales). He said if the city system conveys a 25 year storm then the applicant would design to a 10 year retention, ten year release rate. They have found that Raymond Avenue can convey a 25 year storm and is designed to the 10 year release. He said all of the lighting improvements on the SW 16th Street improvements and plans require the elevation of the roadways to be raised which brought about coordination problems such as curbs, gutters, sidewalks, etc. and the applicant has agreed to take part in the LID so the improvements can be compatible and put in at the same time on SW 16th. If the improvements were put in place at the current proposed elevations there would be 1 - 1-1/2 ft. elevation difference between the roadway and the existing surface of SW 16th Street. Speaking again briefly was Kim Scattarelli who said his department had asked for a 25 year storage, two year release rate for this site - and, his department had commented on the applicant's plans that the 10 year analysis was not complete enough and wanted to reinforce those comments for the applicant at this time. Robert Snyder noted the applicant's awareness of staff concerns for the building products to be used on the project but did not agree with staff's recommendation for the replacement of Dryvit Stucco with standard stucco. He objected to the implication that the applicant is proposing an inferior product for the project. He said The Austin Company is very conscientious about the selection of products on their projects and has done quite a bit of research on them before their use. He presented Exhibit #8 for the record. Planner Lenora Blauman said the recommendation in material was due to previous bad luck with Dryvit material used on the first floor of a building due to outside impacts and the material's durability. Mr. Snyder said the grade of Dryvit used on a ground floor would be able to withstand a greater impact (a Panzer glass mesh). It is highly resistant to impacts, and landscape buffers on ground floors are used to try to avoid vehicular impacts. He reiterated there will be no outside storage, and the landscaping around the site exceeds code requirements. Responding to questions regarding the Dryvit products was David Jack, President, Seattle Wall Systems, 929 So. Harding, Seattle, 98108 who noted the two exhibits of Dryvit presented and explained that Panzer" is only a registered trade name and the only difference between the two exhibits is the outside finish. Lenora Blauman reviewed ordinance requirements for parking for the O-P zone stating the applicant will provide parking for 70 - 80% of the employees as well as spaces for visitors and FAA vehicles. Mr. Snyder responded based on code the, requirement of 853 parking stalls and their net leasable square footage of the building, the warehouse area, due to the occupancy and the potential for the number of people and the needs of the FAA to change, is considered flexible space. The warehouse area is an open area which can be modified quickly to office space each time the FAA changes creating a needformoreemployees. Upon occupancy of this building the 1050 employees and the need for visitor and governmental vehicles leaves approximately 753 spaces for employees. Considering such things as absenteeism and vacations there will still be over 25% of the employees looking for alternative methods for arriving at work. Responding again for staff, Lenora Blauman added that the TMP and other traffic mitigation plans are being worked out and concerns of the Traffic Engineering Department can be addressed; regarding storm drainage she said it is felt this property has been filled enough that it is not in the currently identified theme of flood plain and feels the ERC conditions address that concern; and stated if the Hearing Examiner should approve the use of Dryvit on the first floor that the extra strength Dryvit be utilized all around the first floor, behind planters as well as all other locations. For the record David Jack stated Dryvit has been used in the Pacific Northwest for about 13 years andisconsideredtobeafarmoredurableandattractiveproductthanregularstandardPortlandCement Plaster which is a very durable plaster also used throughout the Pacific Northwest. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing tospeak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:05 A.M. The Austin Company SA-030-89 August 17, 1989 Page 4 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1.The applicant, The Austin Company, filed a request for approval of.a Site Plan for an office building on an 8.8 acre parcel. 2.The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3.The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4.The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5.The subject site is located at 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. The site is located southwest of the Lind Avenue bridge over I-405. 6.The site was originally annexed into the city with the adoption of Ordinance 1745 enacted in April 1959, as amended by Ordinance 1764, enacted in May, 1959. The site has been rezoned twice since its annexation. It was first reclassified H-1 (Heavy Industry) with the adoption of Ordinance 1955 in April, 1962. It was again reclassified in April, 1986 when it was classified O-P (Office Park) by Ordinance 3983. It retains that O-P zoning. 7.The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of office park uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 8.The site is relatively level, with some dips and rises across the site. The elevation ranges from approximately 17.5 feet to 19.5 feet. Staff has identified some portions of the site which it believes lie within the 100 year flood plain. The applicant proposes importing additional fill and intends to place the first floor elevation above the flood plain. Approximately 18,000 cubic yards of materials would be needed to elevate the site. The site was filled in the past and little natural vegetation or slope contours remain. 9.The site is bounded on three sides by public streets. Lind Avenue S.W. is located east of the site. S.W. 16th Street is located north of the site. Raymond Avenue S.W. is located west of the site. Its southern boundary is formed by another parcel developed with office buildings. A square parcel approximately 240 feet square belonging to Puget Power and containing a electrical substation intrudes into the site's northern frontage along S.W. 16th approximately 240 feet from Raymond. 10. The applicant proposes developing a 199,000 square foot, five-story office building on the approximately 8.8 acre site. The site is approximately 962.90 feet wide by approximately 400feetdeep. The east and west property lines vary from approximately 433 feet long to approximately 393 feet long, and the Puget Power substation noted above also affects the site's dimensions. 11. The building will be approximately 77.66 feet tall which excludes the approximately 12 foot tall roof-top machinery tower. The building will be approximately 230 feet wide (north and south facades) by approximately 170 feet deep (east and west facades). The north facade contains the main entrance which will be set off by an articulated entrance. The building will receive a stucco- like trim of a material identified specifically as Dryvit (an insulating material reinforced with layers of fibre mesh and finished with a stucco exterior). This material will be used alongthefirstfloorandastrimaroundtheentrancesoneachofthefacades. These entrances will be detailed from the ground floor to the roof. Curtain walls of aluminum and window glass will constitute the exterior treatment above the first floor. The exterior will also be broken into horizontal bands of windows and spandrels to define the various floors above the first floor. 12. Staff was particularly concerned with the durability of this fabricated stucco material. The applicant proposed using a "Panzer" grade (a trade identifier) around the entry bays and entry ways of the building and an ordinary grade in other detail areas. The Panzer grade contains an extra strong mesh layer which can supposedly respond better to punishing blows or bumps. Staff recommended that more impact resistant material be used along the entire first floor which is more subject to accidental impact from cars, loading trucks, lawn mowing equipment, etc. The Austin Company SA-030-89 August 17, 1989 Page 5 13. The building will be divided between office and warehousing uses with the warehousing served by three (3) roll-up bays located along the south facade. Approximately 155,000 square feet of the building will be used for offices, with the remaining approximately 15,000 square feet of useful space dedicated to the warehousing functions. 14. The applicant proposes providing 853 parking stalls. The office uses require one stall per 200 square feet of space or 775 stalls (155,000/200). The approximately 15,000 square feet of warehousing requires 10 stalls (15,000/1500). The total complement of parking would be 785 stalls. The applicant, therefore, has proposed providing 68 excess parking spaces. The applicant explained that the additional spaces would serve future users as the warehousing is converted to office space. 15. Staff had already concluded that the applicant should reduce the number of stalls to discourage single occupancy vehicles and relied upon the reserved parking provisions found in Section 4- 2208(12). This office is not inclined to review and approve a potential future change in use of the warehousing sections of the building. Parking should not exceed the requirements of the submitted floor plan now under review. As staff has shown, excess parking not only encourages greater reliance on single occupancy vehicles but discourages participation in the Transportation Management Plans required to alleviate traffic in the Valley area of the city. 16. In addition, based upon rough calculations, (34 stalls each of regular parking and compact parking yields approximately 10,744 square feet) the space required to accommodate this excess parking would provide an additional quarter acre of landscaping, bringing this proposal more in line with the high quality office park required by both the zoning code and the Comprehensive Plan. Providing this additional landscaping would further the city's goal of providing a better environment in which to locate businesses in the city of Renton. Reducing overall traffic would serve not only this purpose but potentially reduce expenditures for additional roads, traffic signals and turn lanes. 17. Three driveways will provide access to the site. One driveway will be provided near the center of the north property line, immediately east of the Puget substation. One driveway will belocatedalongtheeastpropertylinejustnorthofthesouthpropertyline. A similar drive will be located along the west property line. The east and west driveways will be located approximately 50 feet from corresponding driveways serving the adjacent parcel to the south. Staff is concerned that turning conflicts could arise with driveways serving between 1,000 and 1,500 cars. Staff suggested driveway consolidation, if at all possible, between these differing ownerships. Additionally, these driveways do not provide the necessary 30 feet minimum width required across the narrowest point of the driveway, and will have to be altered. 18. West of the proposed office building, between it and the Puget substation, the applicant proposes a screened and landscaped courtyard and fountain. Perimeter landscaping 20 feet wide, meeting the code standards, will be provided along the west, north and east propertylines. Taking advantage of the landscaping provided by the adjacent lot to the south, the applicant will not be installing additional landscaping in this area. Strips of landscaping will separate opposing rows of cars and approximately every 200 feet small planters will break up these rows of parking stalls. A similar landscape break in between the rows of cars will not be provided in front of the building. 19. A narrow strip of landscaping approximately 5 feet wide will be found in front of the building,with a similar strip located to the rear. A wider landscaping installation will be located east of the building. There are no sidewalks or pathways located through the parking areas located south and west of the office building or in some of the parking east of the building, as there are in the northeast and east parking areas. 20. Staff recommended that the applicant post a $3,000 bond to assure that the landscaping survives or is reinstalled during the initial 3 years. 21. Staff recommended a bus turnout along Lind, that apparently Metro opposes. CONCLUSIONS 1.The Site Plan Ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a.Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. . Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c.Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; The Austin Company SA-030-89 August 17, 1989 Page 6 d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e.Conservation of property values; f.Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g.Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use generally satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2.In addition, proposed site plans must not adversely affect area-wide property values, must provide adequate air and light, and must not cause neighborhood deterioration or blight. The proposal appears to successfully satisfy these additional criteria. 3.The proposal generally complies with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. It provides additional work opportunities in the growing northern end of the Green River Valley adjacent to I-405. The plan certainly does not provide anything like a park-like complex. With the minimum essentials of peripheral landscaping accomplished along the three street frontages and some small strips of landscaping breaking up the large expanse of asphalt parking the complex is not exactly park-like, a goal envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. 4.The building observes the required setbacks and height limitations of the O-P zone, and presumably the ultimate building will satisfy the Building and Fire Codes, the particulars of which are not under review at this time. 5.The proposal appears to mitigate impacts on surrounding uses although the issue of a consolidated series of driveways with the adjacent use to the south would assist in reducing possible conflicts along both Lind and Raymond from vehicles maneuvering onto and off of the respective properties. There is also the question of whether the site, portions of the site, or none of the site lies within the 100 year flood plain and what quantities of storm water needs retention. Public Works appears satisfied with the preliminary plans and all storm water systems shall remain subject to review and approval of that department. 6.In order to reduce the impacts of the proposal on the site itself, a reduction in parking is necessary and a commensurate increase in landscaping is in order. In attempting to dedicate even more land than is required by code for parking, the applicant undermines the aesthetic aspects of this complex: Since the additional office space remains merely potential, this office will not enter into a review which provides parking for conjectural offices. Therefore, to accomplish the Transportation Management Plan's more worthy objectives of reducing traffic in this vital corridor, the applicant will have to reduce the parking allotment to not more than 785 stalls which is what is required by code. (See further discussion below). 7.Staff has recommended that the stronger version or grade of the Dryvit exterior materials be placed along the lower portions of the building which are subject to more abuse, be it from delivery vehicles, errant automobiles, lawn care equipment, etc. Staffs suggestion appears relevant to the form and continuing appearance of this building. It serves to further the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan which designates this area for high quality, well designed office parks. This objective also carries with it the objective of having these complexes remain well designed and to continue that appearance in the future. The stronger material provides assurances that this will be the case. The applicant shall use the Panzer grade of Dryvit on the entire first floor exterior shell. 8.Development of the parcel, with the exception of increased traffic generation, should not have an adverse impact on property values in the area. Development will obviously increase the tax base of the city. 9.The proposed employment of approximately 1,050 persons on site coupled with the estimated daily vehicle trips of approximately 2,845 will exacerbate traffic problems in the area. Staff noted that: "This rate of travel [2,845 average daily trips] is anticipated to have a notable impact on the site, as well as on the abutting rights-of-way, and on nearby major travel routes." Obviously the site's proximity to the major intersection of Lind and S.W. 16th Street will assist in dispatching arriving and departing vehicles in this area of the Green River Valley. But other routes will be affected. Anything which helps in reducing the number of vehicle trips should be encouraged. Anything which encourages trips should be discouraged. The Austin Company SA-030-89 August 17, 1989 Page 7 10. The large parking allotment proposed by the applicant and the layout of the parking stalls could result in vehicular and pedestrian conflicts. While paths are proposed across some of the landscaped islands, they end in the middle of parked cars. This is inappropriate and staff has generally suggested that these paths continue, on raised walkways, through the parked cars. Pedestrians should not have to weave around parked cars to use hidden sidewalks across the landscaping. This arrangement does not encourage safe passage between parked cars. Therefore, sidewalks/pathways shall continue through the parking aisles rather than leaving pedestrians to meander through parked cars. Parking stalls on either side of such crosswalks require elimination and should conform more closely with those pathways found along the east and northeast parking areas where pedestrian crossings continue through the parking stalls. 11. While the applicant may desire to provide more parking than is mandated by code such additional parking would encourage greater single occupancy vehicle usage. This excess parking would negate the objectives of the Transportation Management Plan. The prime purpose of the Transportation Management Plan is the reduction of and reliance on single occupancy vehicles. The additional unnecessary parking also results in the further diminution of landscaping thereby lessening the.overall aesthetic qualities of this site plan. 12. The site and entry way can be softened by the addition of additional landscaping in the area now proposed for parking west of the main entry, along the north facade of the building. The elimination of those 18 stalls will provide an enhanced and enlarged entry and could be consolidated with the outdoor patio immediately west of the building's northwest corner. The applicant has provided for a variety of landscape materials both around the building, within the parking areas, and along the street frontages and has taken advantage of the landscaping provided along its southern boundary and not supplemented that 10 foot strip. With the elimination of the unnecessary parking, additional landscaping should be incorporated around the site. The applicant and staff can work out additional elimination of parking and installation of landscaping. As staff recommended, the applicant should post a bond to assure the landscaping survives over the initial three year period following installation. 13. The information presented does not permit a determination of the ratio of employees to parking to site area relative to other proposals, but it appears that the applicant is attempting to shoehorn in a larger development than can be appropriately accommodated on the subject site while retaining aesthetic.objectives identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The reduction in parking will assist in restoring a balance between development of the parcel and park-like development. 14. Further review of the close proximity of unconsolidated driveways along the east and west property lines of this site and the adjacent site should be reviewed by staff. Staff probably retains the authority to require consolidation or at least relocation of driveways if unsafe traffic conditions result from conflicting turning movements. As already mentioned, the driveways must be widened to meet the minimum width of 30 feet at the narrowest point of the driveway, not merely a radius of curvature at the curb. 15. The proposed building is set back sufficiently from nearby structures that shading and light and glare problems should not be a problem. Similarly, the building should be afforded reasonable access to light and air. 16. With the possible exception of storm water drainage problems and the ultimate classification of the 100 year flood level, the subject site is well served by public utilities including city water and sewer service. 17. In conclusion, the proposed plan as modified herein appears to serve the public use and interest. While the applicant has enunciated reasons for the additional parking, the offices that that parking would serve are not under review at this time and should not be considered during this review. The applicant proposes approximately 155,000 square feet of office space and approximately 15,000 square feet of warehousing space and the parking should only serve that precise plan. In addition, the city is engaged in an effort to reduce traffic in this growing area and increasing the capacity of a parking area to serve single occupancy vehicles thwarts this effort. The Austin Company SA-030-89 August 17, 1989 Page 8 DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1.The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC, except as modified herein. 2.All driveways shall provide the necessary 30 feet minimum width required across the narrowest point of the driveway, subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division. 3.The applicant shall use the Panzer grade of Dryvit on the entire first floor exterior shell as represented by Exhibit 7b. 4.The total parking allotment for this proposal shall be reduced to not more than 785 stalls, which is the amount required by code. 5.All sidewalks/pathways which cross landscaped islands in the parking areas shall continue through the parking aisles rather than leaving pedestrians to meander through parked cars. Parking stalls on either side of such crosswalks shall be eliminated and shall conform more closely with those.pathways found along the east and northeast parking areas where pedestrian crossings continue through the parking stalls. Sidewalk/Pathway surfaces shall be subject to approval by the city's planning department staff. 6.The applicant shall eliminate the 18 parking stalls found immediately west of the northern entrance to the building and shall install additional landscaping in that area 7.After the parking area pathways are provided across the landscaping strips (Condition 4) and the landscaping is supplemented in front of the building (Condition 5), the applicant and staff can work out the elimination of additional parking and installation of landscaping. 8.Staff retains the authority to require consolidation, or at least relocation, of unsafe driveways. All driveways and driveway locations shall be subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division. 9.The applicant shall post a bond in the amount of $3,000 to assure that the landscaping survives after the initial first 3 years. 10. All storm drainage systems shall be subject to approval of the Public Works Department. 11. All bus shelter locations and turnouts, if any, shall be subject to review and approval of the Traffic Engineering Division. ORDERED THIS 17th day of August, 1989. 4U-1 Y.424 40, FRED J. KA MAN HEARING E AMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 17th day of August, 1989 to the parties of record: Kim Scattarelli Storm Water Utility Department City of Renton Clint Morgan Traffic Engineering Department City of Renton Robert Snyder The Austin Company 800 SW 16th ' Renton,.WA 98055 The Austin Company SA-030-89 August 17, 1989 Page 9 David Jack Seattle Wall Systems 929 South Harding Seattle, WA 98108 Roger Blair, ANM-51 Federal Aviation Administration 17900 Pacific Highway So. Seattle, WA 98108 TRANSMITTED THIS 17th day of August, 1989 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Public Works Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Ronald Nelson, Building Director Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator Garth Cray, Senior Engineering Specialist Valley Daily News Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. August 31. 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision maynotcommunicateinprivatewithanydecision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: GSA/FAA Building ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: i ; ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-030-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199 , 000 square foot office building on an 8 . 8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue and S .W. 16th Street RECOMMENDATIONS:Issue a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide a revised site plan, including 770 parking spaces (with 83 parking spaces identified as being heldinreserveanddevelopedwithlandscapingand/or recreational amenities, subject to the approval of the Planning Division andTrafficEngineeringDivision. Note: After it has been established that an operable Traffic Management Plan has been in effect for at least one year, the Zoning Administrator shall carry out an evaluation of on-site parking at the applicant's request. If the Zoning Administratordeterminesthatthereisanapparentneedforadditionalon-site employees parking, he may release any or all of the parking heldinreserve. 2 . That the applicant provide a revised on-site exterior lightingplan, including a combination of planned 30 foot high exterior lighting fixture and pedestrian-scaled lighting fixturessufficienttoilluminatetheofficestructure, parking area,landscaped areas, recreation areas, and site periphery, subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 3 . That the applicant be required to provide a plan for trafficmanagement, subject to the approval of the Traffic EngineeringDivision, including, but not limited to: a. Assessment for Burlington Industrial Park Benefit Zone. 560, 465. 00 Transportation Benefit Zone Assessment Fee. 2 , 845 trips generated at $197 . 00. b. Building required to have a commuter information center. Also preferential parking space is to be assigned to multi- occupant vehicles and van pool uses. c. Developer to work with Metro to provide a TSM plan whichincludes: 1) information about, organization of, and preferential treatment for vanpools and carpools; 2) information about and incentives for use of public transitsystems; 3) a bus shelter on the west side of Lind Ave. SW nearest to site. This plan is to be approved by the City'sPlanningDivisionandTrafficEngineeringDivision. MitKgatiOn Measures J GSA/FAA buildingPage!2 d. Driveway width to be 30' . e. Existing street light in proposed driveway off Lind Ave. SW to be relocated by a City approved lighting contractor not just removed as shown on plan. f. Provide for street !lighting on SW 16th St. Plans to be coordinated with City proposed street improvements on SW 16th St. Submit drawings for approval . g. SW 16th St. - Lind Ave. SW to Raymond Ave. SW overhead power distribution conductors below 55KV to be undergrounded and placed under or behind the sidewalk. The developer will need to provide for and make those arrangements with Puget Sound Power & Light Company. h. Lind Ave. SW - a right turn deceleration lane needs to be provided for driveway approach. Submittal of design plans required. i. Provide for channelization of a center lane two way left turn at the driveway entrance off Lind Ave. SW. Channelization plans to be submitted. j . SW 16th St. - Provide vehicle turn-out in front of buildingfordrop-off of passengers on SW 16th St. Show plan on drawing. k. A joint driveway access, if feasible, with the adjoining property to the south of the site (Lind Avenue South) . 1. Signage at the drop-and-ride center indicating a five minute maximum limit for parking on that corridor. m. Marking of the fire lane with striping or signage to prevent vehicle parking along that corridor. 4 . That the applicant install sidewalks, curbs and gutters, lightingandlandscapingalongS.W. 16th Street from the western property boundary to Lind Avenue South (including the property whichtraversesthePugetPowerSubstation) and from the corner at S.W. 16th Street south along Lind Avenue to the southern boundaryline. (The proponent may prefer to participate in a L. I.D, which would serve to provide financial benefit at some future point fortheinstallationofthoseandrelatedimprovements. ) 5. That the applicant provide: a) on-site bicycle parkingfacilities; and b) a five foot wide bicycle lane (including gutters) on S.W. 16th Street, in order to facilitate recreational and commuting cyclists. 6. That the applicant be required to provide the following, at the time of site plan/building plan review: a. Specifications for a plan for storm drainage management which includes: a) a detention system which will meet the following two scenarios: i) if conveyance capacity of the existing City storm system is determined to be sufficient in capacity to address a 25 year storm, then the requirement will be ten year detention with a ten year existing conditions release rate, or ii) if the capacity of the existing system is determined to be less than that necessarytoaddressa25yearstorm, the requirements would be for a 25 year detention system with a release rate being computed under predeveloped conditions for the year storm matchingthecapacityoftheexistingsystem (i.e. if the capacity oftheexistingsystemis2years, then the release rate will be computed on the 2 year storm) ; and b) a water quality protection system with baffled oil/water separators and Litigation Measures SSA/.FAA Building Page •3 + biofiltration prior to the off-site release of any stormdrainage. This plan, which has been authorized in principle,should be subject to approval for specific components by thePublicWorksDepartment. b. l. A flood control management system which includes a plan for:a) siting of the structure at an elevation which would ensure protection of that structure and an emergency vehicleparkingareaduring' 100 year flood - '(NOTE: the subject site is not in theiexisting 100 year flood plain) ; and b) a landscaping system which is designed to enhance erosion/flood control management (e.g. berms, plantingswhichcoverandprotectsoil, etc. ) . This plan should be subject to approval by the City's Storm Water UtilityEngineeringDivision. AND b. 2 . A document which acknowledges that the City has informed the applicant that the subject property is located in an area which may be included in an altered 100 year flood plainassumingtheP-1 Channel is not developed) , and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damage to property or person arising from such flooding. This agreement should be subject to approval by the City Attorney. AND b. 3 . A containment program for ensuring that materials now (or inthefuture) stored on site are not allowed to contaminate the underlying terrain in the event of flooding, in order to protect wetland areas in the vicinity of the site. This plan. should be subject to approval by the Public WorksDepartment. Note: The site is not currently in the 100 year flood plain, but that plain may change from current FEMA levels depending on drainage alternatives now being considered bytheCity, such as the P-1 channel project) . Note: See 5/4/89 Memo and 6/7/89 Memo from Storm Water Utility Engineering for specifications. 7. That the applicant be required to provide a plan forconstruction, including: a) an erosion control plan; b) a planforwheel-washing of construction vehicles prior to their leavingthesitetocontroldustanddebris; c) a plan for periodicwateringdownofthesitetocontroldustanddebris; d) a planforhaulingroutesandhaulinghourstomitigatetrafficimpacts;and e) a bond of $3 , 000. 00 for street clean-up. These plansshouldbesubjecttoapprovalbythePublicWorksDepartment,Police Department, and the Planning Division. Note: At the time of site plan review, the site plan, landscapingplan, recreation plan, and other, related plans, all of which weresubmittedonJune5, 1989, which have been approved in principle mustbeapprovedindetailbyCityrepresentatives. Similarly the parkingplanwillneedtobeapproved. mmdoc N I I 11 I A AL\. 0 00. NEM O°O,O •• • • • • • • • • • '+• •• i• -r•' A 0000000 • • • • • • • • • • •% • • r, r`S' imic,i„„ ii,i. .,90,11.. vaggi: , •..:.:.:.: •,.:.:.:.:.:.:.•.-.(,. Aliiii i 4I1ezit.•; 711.,.,:;.‘:_ e, 10 4EN .1\il'igqiet,,,V:11:%:•••• •••••••••••••••••,..•...!:•-::‘,:,,,,,,:- 11111116110000; 2•` 0• .o MIL / let'• •000QoO0000 t • • • gc.). . ....... ... 4 .•.••• 6•• J: i•iii S'111•-O°O°•o°o,e PPc 1: °o$o° °o' • • • •Ioo' 0000 • • • r. 111 1'O000°oo o°o'Y.'>,,;xri11 • • • •a1Io 000 000• • • • 14tv`o'?`.,::'>$t.111 • • • • • ^ ,.. o°o°o°0000. • • • <::'i:::.'`:•:i>r1 iC • • • fId& 4VY(a l I.000000°oo • • ri:.r.>.r $:;C,1 +'• • -0 /l~ Ikl o0°pogo°°°. >• i i • •• • 000000 o 0 0 0°0° °•°•° I l A Agogov,0000000000000 0000• i •-- •:1I11 f:z ppmig •:: ,l? Q II I ter° rl.^ o°oogogo°o°o°o +•Oo•?., i IyIII [rl , • i\I/.•f 00000 0 0 0 0'ti o 0 0 0 ti , ' f:x: Iii 0 °0°0° o>~ °' fC.•' I Ill• 1voow• o00000000 .l ., or 11y6Q611. r qQp• .: v #:#.;:a::s••°° 0°0\I 0°0°0Od°000000000 • •O I R;;;-_ QG?'.,t{:..{.0000 o0000000 0 • a,i.00000000 o00000000 o If1 . 0,0 0 4p t('° 1 1111111111,11111111Nor•inii- k.11 1,.•.. 1. 11/* r• o0000o ii: i i.1 I'cj)"7 .[I •-,W r 7, t I :: °O°o°o°o° 0% INENLA ri r •;t j D.' i• n.( "'1 A'':' ,,Sion K—a».K/ n C['•r ..;< s 1'2:>::': ::':::: :::::::::::<•:::. ''i.c g Eii „ um •rili+ ••000.• h 5:."ti:'A.lr`S`\.3`•„ S 74„ 1 mi_m_li:i=: r:f I 1:1116.1 '•°..•., i. m r: K it:: :: ; .'',•is,t 41r '' ' ,• 41 r,. r:(i i i.il rrq r: rl iii :.ii.;ai,: ,Si S. ; Cr& i'ly•,1 SS r s• /:::E:f'ii ::';}_!•'Oarl!'!/ Rr. r:,.n •cF Nove o.-,. •;, . _---_--.. a . . ... a:-• r;.>«.:.< , i' ,. ;, Ie: I ; y =_'m,r__-_=__ 1::::_:.:•.:_.:::: i:1:1: 1:•::. i....:::1:1::i..::: 1:1:1:: 11e. • ii:;' .•zap ir: n..•., ,.•+ i poi:ij k r• AfP Q- •oo.. -------- j r 000 Yi l i 00000t0000.. s o o ; 0000. c+ i t.., _--- OOOOOO OOL.1.''` p0 C 9Y 00 ST'c C i 00000000000.:r. I!O! i p:1 -t O : ` ,•.. I.Es.t;e 1 ^_•q 0000000000.N.•., ZY!/-0..i Orlin ya., • 11 •{. ,;GI'" C.ii - •0000000000000,•.., -- mud mmmmm e.:) o;,i:(1000000000000006ST^^ J•C>> ,. u•• ' 00000000000000" — -(, ' • •!4. 1.71;.'r,, •r,'n0 •000000000000000000000.o.0 00000. . . ••.'_-_ 4tCa_ 1`ff. MINI r t' if 4::: i;i:::.. ::::::. i:.. s;adidc•.• • I . I i: _ r'J INFI 000 ik:°..k‘:...''''': rt '''''::. iiirillimir.11 t,„. i 000 c Soo '\\:':;: ::.' .c.Il, _ 000,___ •'-0000000-_ :::,C':- - -- --'000•-=_ 11i:::r E ::: =lip i . T• tI' • lamp01-9n'ear Q I pS ;•!ir r,,•i.i1 F.T1 1 .. i i v Limit 0000 Sri 000000• Sf.OOU00000000(ilIIPiiI .m..u.w:# yI!Aif7.c . 000 ' 7(,.. o000000III0000. •.-_--• ----_---_ r 000000• 1 0000 1 r 'Ililllllll x ' G,y a .(4 ...jlr'',' r','o Eri: t 1). LAND USE ELEMENT 6.11i:mi::::::::::.•I SINNIMINEOM Single Family Commercial A' _—':': •.'.11. y0000. "i',.4•' y( tip 00000 Jc. tr',-, p r"I• '\„0000000000D0000 r S 00000LowDensity Multi-Famil Office / Office Park Poo ' ` ;tJ? 0000• 1••p•y;2.•". 0 DO•00000000000000000000 V.'.'%'Medium Density 000.00' p Multi-Family °°°°°°° Public/Quasi-Public P ° nlyo000000. oopo i° J:,•:..? = = High Density J,• tiy° f Multi—Family Light Industrial r V,•.• e,. c00? 1,.0 0000 Recreation Heavy Industrialy: . Greenbelt Manufacturing Park WWI•i I Miittinie flntinn .V! V ILilo volifiripI,A 1IIIIIII' L.____ ___ ___-,,,, . ...,, ll, D su R ,- fill j111.10011..W d' , l I lunir A ""'' 11111110P.---=-- 11, H-Ella-I0 I " 111I II ilifii.00;3n T n, l( I imi c ti11UIIllll.i QC]llL III 1--Il•°IP11lllillllh(II fIl] 1 rh t r--1 4 0 5 I li . ,. , , ,K,.....% : 0 3 7- -f- 1 -1:114.' L * 4!':- • r:1 i_-_-__"-._ i' 1-- - \\ I } \ __. __ ...I' it*" III ".iiII1Il1(f IQI _ : •---- ; •-:::,:_ t - -#•- A -.H . 1111 I >i 1 L.JII I i-III W 2;7._ t a i ..._;.,.. ,.....fir:1- t t• r J1 t-\./4 I• , . 0 4. I ._.fie -_ —,. u. J I1 It . f to. 4v< W i9TU gL kr) 7:1_i 1.7.7=or1 t''L— 4 1 11 I R- D o — p ij-% w p . ___ __ ____3 - 1, 74 1. V AUSTIN COMPANY SA-030-89 , ECF APPLICANT THE AUSTIN COMPANY TOTAL AREA 8 . 8 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS LIND AVENUE AND SW 16th STREET EXISTING ZONING OP EXISTING USE VACANT j PROPOSED USE OFFICE BUILDING COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS LOCATED AT S.W. 16th STREET AND LIND AVENUE 0 20 0 (o ao 21) ml ow N SCALE:v.(a'-r THE AUST I N I SEnla±`fyol_5 HOLMES I W. I SEATTLE I COMPANY I I CONC. LON.ELECTRIC • 1 < I LUMBER I I 1 Q;IJII II r YIS I U II `--- J ENT ACCESS I e 1_ AREA LIGHTING Z DRIV ASP/NLL--- 18'SS-- U la'SS—j-----7 18'SS——— PAv M j L L- BEGIN NLIY SI DEWALK I - I 1027.81' -N 89. 35' 25' E' SW 161 H STREET WE"'STREET IOLTLPIC - NEW CLRe - I TTTP> 6' SI DENALI(EASELENT 1_--CAS- EXIST.FIRE HYDRANT_PI Pa I1F IrCI-W- NEW 6' SIDEWALKS _G,s__ k GMT R __ I 1'1'CI-w- YLPIC 1z'n W F321IBE1 cAs- PIPELIE Y"---- A• .-- n2.• -7 1F i7- 1ST DROP OFF LANE PIPELIN' u ee' 5. 2`-E c xl SI. FIRE KYDRAM EXIST SIDEWALKR\wLE1 it — — t IT q`.A" 30• PUGET POKER EASEIENT LANDSCAPING I 32 5A 412.89' s--EXIST. POKER POLE EXIST. CONE. CUReB I tF}6 17- 5.0' -N O1' 22' S8' E T-.---r LANDSGPI I-G x <8‘% II - H3__ 1 •4,4-,-'[1-- I ELECT IR• EFIckcELEM 10•LAIASCAN NG GSELENT i F I C A T C A T \ SIDEWALK CONE I 1CAL j 1 .1 I I ( I I I I I I i P`t f 1.,L 1 1 I I I I I I i I I I I I I 1 I I i [2 P'f o \I I I 1 ,/ 1 ASPHALT PAVELEM__ ELECTRICAL EASEIEM II II II II I IXI8CA(T- IZQ CDLPA6T I I 1 r`, I I I I 1 n IF 18 C AE T.7 A i 3 ili 1 Ianananan — o r I GPIs f I I3S2'0 8NgPUGETPOWERSiOlzOIK(Io1GP O 70- - I SUBSTATION II J R"`P1 MOGICAP I IJ, y gc x I I I I I .1 I I191 CDEPACT l 8 51ALL5 25Tn s I I g 1 I / r9iTAIN, D- NTRAIt.,C U(_F—5 -- I-3 I I Icz1lICANTBOLLARDSL— \./ - __ -__ ___ I I 1Z o, TTP) nM ^.I It--EXIST IF4^ I COU(TTARD I lC g_ _ I i IE. I Ne 1 25' DRAINAGE 1 SCREEN II BUS STOP - GROUP I I-_ ___ CASE LENT wAL 1 J -• g a I I HEALTH LAHD5GP11G r' j 1 . i" I 2Ao.n -Mir 35 zs E _Ttr ti *C cao,.i --1! >y1 ZI ie c I' I r Y t y XC OFFICE BUILDING s - - < I I II Nr- --1 rc 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 P1 P`P 1 c FIN. FLR. EL. 21.75 I2CATr(y I I I /I I BOEING EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT-++I. c I _ —o, tOI, I COMPUTER LANDSCAPING a X 3 LZc1tI — N I SERVICES I I v D. „II_ I n 1 I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 i4i$1A11DARD I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l 2151MDA'Rf r " q t I I ; \EI151. FIRE HYDRANT MECTR1i(EASEIQNT"I-7 _ LAKDSCi1P,NJ—Y U. Vi • I i- I IIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIllll `fz'ISIAi i 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i r2151A°°i L Y( D V;4J; i i II •ASPHALT PAVE LENT I- _,Q I. HEN I-0- LOADP NG PLANTER I 516EkAl' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111116GDLPADTIIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllik,IAE11 ,: . GK I J— III IIII1I1IhIIt1II ( — II IIJI ILANDSCAPING—j. x r I —— —NEw ACCESS---..., III 1 I I I I I I IR'"` 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '151A1"i° 11 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 f SIAi1R9 J I I I I I I I I'I'I I I I L; III I I IDRIVECCE55 II 1— Z CON:. SLAB I I I Iot-1 1ASPHALTPAVEII I L, I-" ~ 1 I I I^I III I I I{{1/1 J rrn1 I I I I I I I I I LEI I l I I I I I I 13T! AHD4Rd a l I l I l I !IIII 111 11111 I I,1 I I I I I I I I I GeI S 'DARd D 111 I I I I I,,1, I I I I I I I I I I I • I.1 I I I I I 13R S1AWRd j IT;-'I I I I I III111L 9E2.90' -H 89. 49' DI-w I. 1 • ; IT1'r r I iI11 I I'--I EXISTING 71' S' EXIST. )D' LANDSCAPING STRIP I I IHi---DRIVE JEXIST. 10'Wv EXIST IAC N• I III ,ACCESS DRIVE 1 I I I II I II I VALLEY OFFICE PARK SITE PARKING I I I Exlsl,tG2A' I I I T01 AL PARKING REWIRED w 853(BASED ON 171).600 PET SO.FT.) I II I I I 1I I I ACCESS DRIVFIIITOTALPARKINGFREWIDEDK853III I I I NOTE: FULL SIZE(6a -503 III I I I II I : '" OFF-SITE ILPROVEIEMS FOR HANDICAP` _I I I R•q°ti.1 I I I sr 16TN STREET SHALL B CMACT (A09 3R2 I I 1 I I I I I ?.`ti titer";;CONSTRUCTED UNDER FUTU(E t..; 3( 19 SW 161N STREET L.I.D. SECURED DE SPACES 0OSPICES 1' USE'VECNICLES SPACES SD SPACES 1 /i.j -VISTOR PARK AKA:50 SPACES 4*•A ..+'I TDTAL DEDICATED SPACES-1D0 SPACES 5,•b, F' TOTAL ELPL OTEE PARKING-753 mow,•,.F3C-,:'' MOM WC 4.IS1 D. N o.m COI nn1u Pn C.w HIE'( 1•<<D-0• 'iv, SITE PLAN o . 89-5477feaDTHEAbSTINGoo nCOMPANY1-11 03-30-89 G.S.A.C-2 1 j I toe 100 0 tee fee iliMIMMIMI r i"" noL IDAY INN GRAOT wA/ 7.------ j I I I I STORAIOWATER DRAINAGE NOTES r..KICK•.I C061.lRtd a[VIlV1[Ilf•Cf1.IR C[LE,••a•m6110.010.KR.0 KM[/CP I T.IK CITY Cr amen[Ma KW 6 PLK 14Q, i KUM DCPC/1. TO BELLEI/UE 2. P.I.• mb1M1d LPL:001 1 0a•rsamu0.PINIMPICIf11n.p.o S!nrL K IN !a 1010.KIOLI Pi 02 COMM rsnrnu CDP11.0Kr I0PK0 P•s 0.0.1..•O 1K ulnw nL.0 Pas•SSSAT Id pow.AS Al r-- I.Ill OTT 0 Rna X/PIKAO 0 MUG RLA. LIMITED AGGRESS FREEWAY INTERSTATE a WS 7 7 i [• --7-1 HE Cu 1K.a sns'7 r COvi fi I I j IKx m6IRC1la n.•Rmaa. L CORGRES<I- T NOL[ES I ISEATTLE III I s. nllr s.u[[u.s.c s MISS AKw•II f•nar0 A11 7 ELECTRIC LU16ER Iova.II MOU5TRI Al. 'i I/ R.oriuo[:Ilru.a•[ICDU 0.NC•P•16. t PARK J J 1. Al SID.Keu.wnos.a IK.vnCS+m IC n vrnnaJJIIIJaL_--- I L----IL J L_ J\L ON 10 4L...c.p DwsOa•c rn+s+ncrlP .0 PC, L---- J 11 ---- j Itz:[LnslClan•roru..0 v+n PUMP ID. 1S CDM[Ir0•O IK IWla.a Ia YS.IC IIr61q I I I I ----"--_-"---- r / R 7. I[l Trw.W[Tfa.P IKIL IT I[S YS•[IE141[D lO Imo. I I r 1 I 1-- QIll tai.t OM M1111.I IlD.IK o[M•[tl T6•flq 1 1 I MP•OSCD ' ^ BETA-+PEST I BETA-M'EST I. w.ss cm 4• [•.111. I.N..C1.10.1 1K CUSS SIPI] PnuK.0K.T..r,T.v RrP..aSD n•p.n 1.KS. 0rr1[I LOT t L0T s •I LING[1.1nKlfl0DRR•KIK.S.RCO.•sap ucnn•0i'[a P I I. • PK•.O I..I..T[..KIS S..a,:u0 q I w0T.t1 I i[MYa•a.YI.P,•.:P.•CI..:-S[CI IP I 7 OT11 I \\ GROUP HEALTH I 7„,,. /7,, ,I I I v iK•b..PI n.tl v ols.•r.P n.p.o xcn, uTlaLOPERAiIVCIIaKUPactDa6..C1.0. IPS S...l .0 of KUSS.a I l nnlK o 1K 1.10..vI1a 011E.0 1< 1.o.I.P r•Ic K`l io DP fac... 0e r s.•+`-I.oKv„KCw a0 I N 11111C1.0 1K P .•1[Sl•••01'[D 0.•W0r1 1 LP&I IP, O.0 MU.Kt POT[QI.S...l Q.f.•GLASS C. PI.IK myna.V•P.C INK 1.0.M,.f1LlC [ \ .\\ I> 1I IC CeM;1[D TD n•IM.InI Id Aid..•C S1 11.n,1 O % \ `S`s.• io i f tr I I IIIC16pc s.+cvtKi'rai.:o•IeQl T-r..ft00. O O \ I 10.4l.•..C[D n[[t PR•p 4W•.C'r:STl'[I•.R Ia Pt C C 1 w...a nnv [s 1SKC+a•v.ee SanKn n arolerots.. o TIC 01 t [ 1 I„3f,LOT 2 I 11.n.nu0s If+tl.a r P.M!)PK,I ID Rn T I-sw•.c to(v.P Pap...CI•••I.a TO ofCT r, LOT 3 I iK Iv v•n o..Ai Mt. I I rl I<I I u u..0 C.Tdl[,4•PPP MTOL K IK•es 0.10 r[r.e LO•GACRES I I I J, I ` 1 O.vole CV MD MP."l.nfIImI.e RR Pena-..• I I -- VALLEY OPTI CE PARK ---I 1 2 PLL K1 IC.4ORa 1K:SS PICK/C1::1••••7vp P IK JI {f- P Cnr Cf[na¢PAPER DI P LIC.vau.OCS1d IICIK[1.S\ a. I...0<[roe[.T61a.1CT[a ten o.OeSix MTC'CS..ta Km RC. S Iklte:E Y61L K Cr Ku ipc f0.LCP•C PT oT:C•1TTIO6D.'.I'0I1 72S MOr1ISS.IL'oo IiI r-•vxs.eL Mss..6:.p-r.m.:-ri0[Ksst.e. LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS.All 1u IDI.G Den 610:5 Ap rm IC w.R sol t[CaKQ[D 1 I I 1 c TO T(a1s•w...0 S•s•[..4c[SS..0•[0 P TK PARCEL 'A• QMPK+I a Wait wP.s.CtSIq Ic•Kn 1.nw wTP I 1 I 1W5 7••0 S I.•.•ILIT CfrIQ.O IIDIRiP•L M111-SI TlISIDl r.1• . wPL I V 7.13 w1M•CISTST[IA [00I00 ASI0 1D TE I C FAIC TO TIC S.CP ILL7 1[COIIMD YDII nC Rlgf Cal K MOO.PP CDVI[Ilq.1` I R QC:/DIIe r.1a0Z71piJ. I'I y CITY IW I Q'1PT IK1SC 0141 6 PERK OCIC M TO TIC CITT O Q1rd 11'SIT QQnq 0[SIICITOCIQlt[ PC CO K67 0•(TI V10/ IMI.[COn11.111C Gr 1 IP KITS IL.MIDI Kw PO/d lI•TIIITT.I CCIID.II.STOWIIJw'• I00701 SDD01Ta0077QAV 17D711C]11Q41tDliRENTON WW1 Mtn DISKSn.a.IPnKe.1K PP c RPaOQSACt•CrlP AP caI:.1Tq rip:K r.sl1 rlfSTIw.cIsmart1•OW CITY Cr Rllid,mJRT O.IC,PATE Cr O91IILid, MD 1.1.alr..C[O 1K Male AO.IDCD MARC 0061.1.01d, i/ I I IC I 17.114W16*14YniT Dorms.M'[0TIVOC uKI Cr A1I161[ I 1 1 W PARCL' •Ti• p. R WW1 KID[D AG106 70 MO:[-^•1K pa K.11..i 1 IC'1 7.Kln Cr71(I MCI Ilm{ITTIIK MM-SI[DIYlnd r.1,sRn Cr 14 MAC. C iD Ra:CC w',fIP,IN C0.(QId Ii A¢vOloc r0 TK s.D•1 R•7 WOW PCP.I.a C4MT 1K ww7.P¢d 101.CPIa r Tot mnuO PIlyf' INC 1M•[l[:tlWa...••..T r• plrM i 1 4 RaCIC r.IOC7ri1af7; IOI rfIW1 C[I6LKI OR A.•wf}'[D 11•ff.0 C7n14IWa••P 1 S 1 . . p.lna Or 1/[MPI[tl Y 1 [IQR 7E TAST 7O.a FM I I I i r--- o IL1c All 0.Tun o.S.c.O.T.1 5141.. 1 00..,Polr.veld ev nTro TO TIC CITY 7 a.rd xunuTToa i otu.I1Vnc man Pall AMT.I• I I .I I ` rq SPILT Iwlacs In IKtD 0C a[D rat RWDI ri r.7O77s017f Y.SRCuI wool¢11ATI Pll Q KW KO IT 11 Rd1Q n1u7[1 TIC OM [ d acmE .COAT VIP UPC a 1.6.1111aTd. LGATI4 a PM.MC•D111010 .wP1CTI4 MIA Iola WC AMMO; In 0= arc 1•••11104 n 0•9 Q THE AUSTIN 0' Tt11 VICINITY MAP D e9-sm COMPANY q,t O3 03-e9 cper G.S.A.RIT C-1 COMSVLTAIVTS fSRGNITCCTS S'•'D K__ AA _____ CW 1 ATM CT RFFT RPM'ON- WA_ nu, C • o c O. •®---- 0 • . CD@ , a I. ' r-- l for 1 A l l I 1 I` I .N i I- Ills III IIII III I 1111111H11 ; ill ' I r. 1 IIII • I. I Iri- 11111 11 II Ill 111 1 III II rurr 1 f Iiji. 11lll.11llllll 111 I ! iiI iIIIIIIILI I. I i i 11 III I .I , + I•I • IIIIII 11 1 I 11111• I 11 . 1 11. 1 . q,„ ,-,„ „ i- ' I I w^ter----+ r I I I I i I I I 'I IIIIII -IIIIII II 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII g1 II I11IIiIIlII I C II"111HI 11 I 1 , 1 II I I III ywn rr I IIl:111111Illli 11 I11 IIIIIIIIIIIIII• 111 s r. rr 1 IIII II IIIIIII ( If liIiill III 11111 11111 I 1 " ., r+.+--• E+. I I I I i l l I I I i I I I I f I i I I i I I CI I I I ! I I i I !I I I I o 7N • l_ YATIoI I a,s ! V G.T 1 a 1,i m,.c . - i/IY •• I' - O• gc--LC s I/is,'..• I'. CO 0 'c) ----- 9 . ®T• T•0, c) C r I Te_.. i I I I 4 1 I t IiiiiiiIii• Iii • III II .11 ` _• 1_J • ' _ • , . ' I ! • • II fIl . 11illiil1iIll , IIl1t ill II Iili ( IIII IIiI ii . ! _ IIIIIIl111111 : 1II II 1 FIIIIIIIIII II IlilII II 1 . 11 II ! Illlil ' IIIIIIIIII IIIIII . IIIIi sl i4 y .rr.r i _I ' I.....u_i I I ! ! I l l l l ! III ! I I I i ! 1 I I I 1 I , 1 1 i I I , I ; i I I . l I l 1 1 + yrt.f' a I111111 ! II , . IiII I I i l l s I I I I III + IIIiI MIL ! Ii I111i iii '. I 1 11 I III lii lli ) IllIII III I + iIijII J 1 111 z.o .r s40..pirl• I I I IIII11: t 3CIIfAP09.14t.rit 1 I L y AT 1 0 o.u.T'J •'.... v AT 1 o IJ . SG<.LC S I/14• • I' • O aca.Lc i/y' s I' . O' I I I I S R II/WM.1 o i T THE AUSTIN, . ^-. mom AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the day of 198. , I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing4%.*--wuI Cy.a.m,rue', documents. This information was sent to: NAME: REPRESENTING: q276Art Stm9c \( l 4lifS c)-a,Y,-P< 1 WSbo-r SIGNED BY:S' An ,1rn SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this Sr day of CJ 1989% No u is in an for he State of Washington, residing at Q. , f therein. Project Name and Number: ht, M !""" 'vim 030-. CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9: 00 AM, AUGUST 8, 1989 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-030-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199, 000 square foot (177, 000 square feet of leasable space) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. The property is located on Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street. ti A T, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 8, 1989 APPLICANT: The Austin Company FILE NUMBER: ECF; SA-030-89 LOCATION:1601 Lind Ave. S.W. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199, 000 square foot 177, 000 square feet of leasable space) office building on an 8 . 8 acre parcel in . an Office Park (O-P) zone. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: The Austin Company 2. Applicant: The Austin Company 3 . Existing Zoning: Office 'Park (O-P) 4 . Existing Zoning in the Area: Office Park (O-P) and Manufacturing Park (M-P) 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Office Park . 6. Size of Property: 8 .8 acres 7. Access: S.W. Sixteenth Street and Lind Ave. S.W. 8 . Land Use: Vacant land and a Puget Power substation. 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Manufacturing and office uses. East: Office uses. South: Office uses. West: Industrial/office uses. C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date 1. Original Annexation N/A 1745 4-14-59 Amended N/A 1764 5-27-59 Amended N/A 1928 12-22-61 2 . Rezone to H-1 N/A 1955 4-25-62 3 . Rezone to 0-P N/A 3983 4-14-86 PRELIMINARY REPORT T^ THE HEARING EXAMINER The Austin Company PUBLIC HEARING August 8, 1989 Page 2 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: A twelve inch main runs along S.W. Sixteenth Street and a sixteen inch main runs along the east side of Lind Ave. S.W. b. Sewer: An eighteen inch line runs along the north side of S.W. Sixteenth Street and a fifteen inch line runs along the east of Lind Ave. S.W. c. Storm Water Drainage: A fifteen inch storm drain underground concrete pipe system) takes storm water south on Lind Ave. S.W. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance,requirements. 3 . Transit: Metro routes #163 and #247 run along Lind Ave. S.W. 4 . Schools: Not applicable 5. Recreation: Fort Dent Park is approximately 1. 5 miles northwest of the project site. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-718, Office Park District. 2 . Section 4-738, Site Plan Review. 3 . Section 4-744 , Landscaping. 4 . Section 4-2201-2215, Parking and Loading. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Green River Valley Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 31-32) . 2 . Urban Design Goal, Objectives and Policies, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 11-14) . 3 . Industrial Goals, Objectives and Policies, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 18-19) . G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant is seeking site plan approval for a five story/199, 000 square foot office building, (177, 000 square feet of leasable space) . Approximately 155, 000 square feet of space will be allocated for offices, service areas and amenities; approximately 15, 000 square feet will be used for warehousing/storage. Exterior materials are proposed to be aluminum, glass and dry-vit stucco. Interior amenities include a cafeteria, a lounge and exercise rooms. Exterior amenities include a parking area, open space, and passive/active recreation areas (seating, trails, etc. ) . The complex is to be leased to GSA/FAA for a ten year period, with an additional ten ,year option. The complex has been designed to meet the interior space and exterior space needs of GSA/FAA for now; the present space allocation plan can bemodifiedtomeetthefutureneedsofthisclientorotherclients. PRELIMINARY REPORT TC -HE HEARING EXAMINER The Austin Company PUBLIC HEARING Augu;,t 8, 1989 Page 3 2 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA RCW 43 .21 (C) , 1971, as amended) the Environmental Review Committee reviewed the project and identified likely impacts in the areas of earth/water, aesthetics, transportation, natural environment, environmental health, and public ; services/utilities. A Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on June 7, 1989, with the following conditions., as designed to address the above-referenced impacts: a. That the applicant provide a revised site plan, including 770 parking spaces (with 83 parking spaces identified as being held in reserve) and developed with landscaping and/or recreational amenities, subject to the approval of the Planning Division and Traffic Engineering Division. Note: After it has been established that an operable Traffic Management Plan has been in effect for at least one year, the Zoning Administrator shall carry out an evaluation of on-site parking at the applicant's request. If the Zoning Administrator determines that there is an apparent need for additional on-site employees parking, he may release any or all of the parking held in reserve. b. That the applicant provide a revised on-site exterior lighting plan, including a combination of planned 30 foot high exterior lighting fixture and pedestrian-scaled lighting fixtures sufficient to illuminate the office structure, parking area, landscaped areas, recreation areas, and site periphery, subject to the approval of the Planning Division. c. That the applicant be required to provide a plan for traffic management, subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division, including, but not limited to: 1. Assessment for Burlington Industrial Park Benefit Zone. 560,465. 00 Transportation Benefit Zone Assessment Fee. 2,845 trips generated at $197. 00. 2 . Building required to have a commuter information center. Also preferential parking space is to be assigned to multi- occupant vehicles and van pool uses. 3 . Developer to work with Metro to provide a TSM plan which includes: 1) information about, organization of, and preferential treatment for vanpools and carpools; 2) information about and incentives for use of public transit systems; 3) a bus shelter on the west side of Lind Ave. SW nearest to site.. This plan is to be approved by the City's Planning Division and Traffic Engineering Division. 4. Driveway width to be 30' . 5. Existing streetlight in proposed driveway off Lind Ave. SW to be relocated by a City approved lighting contractor not just removed as shown on plan. 6. Provide for street lighting on SW 16th St. Plans to be coordinated with City proposed street improvements on SW 16th St. Submit drawings for approval. 7. SW 16th St. - Lind Ave. SW to Raymond Ave. SW overhead power distribution conductors below 55KV to be undergrounded and placed under or behind the sidewalk. The developer will need to provide for and make those arrangements with Puget Sound Power & Light Company. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER The Austin Company PUBLIC HEARING August 8, 1989 Page* 4 8. Lind Ave. SW - a right turn deceleration lane needs to be provided for driveway approach. Submittal of design plans required. 9. Provide for channelization of a center lane two way left turn at the driveway entrance off Lind Ave. SW. Channelization plans to be submitted. 10. SW 16th St. - Provide vehicle turn-out in front of building for drop-off of passengers on SW 16th St. Show plan on drawing. 11. A joint driveway access, if feasible, with the adjoining property to the south of the site (Lind Avenue South) . 12 . Signage at the drop-and-ride center indicating a five minute maximum limit for parking on that corridor. 13 . Marking of the fire lane with striping or signage to prevent vehicle parking along that corridor. d. That the applicant provide a plan to install sidewalks, curbs and gutters, lighting and landscaping along S.W. 16th Street from the western property boundary to Lind Avenue South (including the property which traverses the Puget Power Substation) and from the corner at S.W. 16th Street south along Lind Avenue to the southern boundary line. (The proponent may prefer to participate in a L.I.D, which would serve to provide financial benefit at ,some future point for the installation of those and related improvements. ) e. That the applicant provide: a) on-site bicycle parking facilities; and b) a five foot wide bicycle lane (including gutters) on S.W. 16th Street, in order to facilitate recreational and commuting cyclists. f. That the applicant be required to provide the following, at the time of site plan/building plan review: 1. Specifications for a plan for storm drainage management which includes: a) a detention system which will meet the following two scenarios: i) if conveyance capacity of the existing City storm system is determined to be sufficient in capacity to address a 25 year storm, then the requirement will be ten year detention with a ten year existing conditions release rate, or ii) if the capacity of the existing system is determined to be less than that necessary to address a 25 year storm, the requirements would be for a 25 year detention system with a release rate being computed under predeveloped conditions for the year storm matching the capacity of the existing system (i.e. if the capacity of the existing system is 2 years, then the release rate will be computed on the 2 year storm) ; and b) a water quality protection system with baffled oil/water separators and biofiltration prior to the off-site release of any storm drainage. This plan, which has been authorized in principle, should be subject to approval for specific components by the Public Works Department. 2 .a. A flood control management system which includes a plan for: a) siting of the structure at an elevation which would ensure protection of that structure and an emergency vehicle parking area during a 100 year flood - (NOTE: the subject site is not in the existing 100 year flood plain) ; and b) a landscaping system which is designed to enhance erosion/flood control management (e.g. berms, plantings which cover and protect soil, etc. ) . This plan should be subject to approval by the City's Storm Water Utility Engineering Division. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO SHE HEARING EXAMINER The Austin Company PUBLIC HEARING August 8, 1989 Pagel- 5 AND 2 .b. A document which acknowledges that the City has informed the applicant that the subject property is located in an area which may be included in an altered 100 year flood plain assuming the P-i Channel is not developed) , and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damage to property or person arising from such flooding. This agreement should be subject to approval by the City Attorney. AND 2 .c. A containment program for ensuring that materials now (or in the future) stored on site are not allowed to contaminate the underlying terrain in the event of flooding, in order to protect wetland areas in the vicinity of the site. This plan should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department. Note: The site is not currently in the 100 year flood plain, but that plain may change from current FEMA levels depending on drainage alternatives now being considered by the City, such as the P-1 channel project) . Note: See 5/4/89 Memo and 6/7/89 Memo from Storm Water Utility Engineering for specifications. g. That the applicant be required to provide a plan for construction, including: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles prior to their leaving the site to control dust and debris; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust and debris; d) a plan for hauling routes and hauling hours to mitigate traffic impacts; and e) a bond of $3 , 000. 00 for street clean-up. These plans should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Police Department, and the Planning Division. Note: At the time of site plan/building permit review, the site plan, landscaping plan, recreation plan, and other, related plans, all of which were submitted on June 5, 1989, which have been approved in principle must be approved in detail by City representatives. Similarly. the parking plan will need to be approved. 3 . Representatives from various City departments have reviewed the proposal for an office complex. Comments are appended and their contents are integrated into this report. 4 . SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA The Site Plan Review Ordinance lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a Site Plan approval application. These include the following: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies:. The proposed office park development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of Office Park for the subject property. This project also is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies for industrial development, generally, as well as for development in the Green River Valley. PRELIMINARY REPU'`1 '' TO mHE HEARING EXAMINER The Austin Company PUBLIC HEARING August 8, 1989 Page 6 For example, the Comprehensive Plan Industrial Development Policies call for: 1) industrial areas (to) be compatible with adjacent land uses (VI) (A) (1) ; 2) industrial uses to be located and designed so that access is convenient to major transportation corridors VI) (A) (2) ; 3) compatible design and landscape themes should be encouraged (VI) (A) (6) . Similarly the Green River Valley Plan calls for the promotion of high quality. . . industrial uses", for development to be encouraged on "vacant filled land" , and for the provision of a "quality working environment for employees" . Staff believe that the development as proposed and/or as recommended by staff will be an attractive, functional complex, designed in accord with the above-described Comprehensive Plan criteria. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The office complex, as proposed and/or as recommended by staff conforms to development standards for the Office Park (OP) Zone (4- 718) , such as height of structure and setbacks. The development also is planned (or will be recommended) to conform to the Landscaping Ordinance (4-744) , the Parking and Loading Ordinance 4-2204) , and the Site Plan Review Ordinance (4-738) . c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses: Impacts from the proposed development have been identified in the following areas: earth, water, aesthetics, transportation, natural environment, public services and utilities. These impacts are discussed below: 1) Earth/Water The subject property is located in the Green River Valley, an area in which there are special concerns related to the presence of existing wetlands as well as former wetland areas which have been filled. Much of the Valley is in a 100 year floodplain, as identified by Federal Emergency Management Act FEMA) Maps. The subject parcel is, itself, a filled site. It is not identified as a wetland on the FEMA map, but is considered to be possibly subject to future flooding due to changing configurations in the Valley, based upon filling of other sites, the potential conceptualization of the P-1/P-9 channel, and other similar factors. Due to the potential sensitivity of the site and of proximate properties, the development of an adequate storm drainage management system, landscaping and permeable surface plans for this site are deemed to be of critical importance to the protection of the underlying areal terrain and the local water system. The plans developed/recommended to address these impacts are presented in more detail in Section G.4 .d. and Section G.4 . i. of this report. 2) Aesthetics The proposed office park, including the five-story. glass/aluminum structure, amenities (e.g. trails, exercise areas, seating, outdoor dining) , landscaping/wildlife preserve and parking areas, has generally been designed and/or recommended to be compatible with surrounding industrial developments. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER The Austin Company PUBLIC HEARING August 8, 1989 Page 7 For example, the proposed architectural design complements that utilized for abutting office parks. The planned aluminum/glass siding is acceptable; proposed dry-vit stucco will need to be replaced by standard stucco, which is more attractive and durable. i The proposed landscaping plan includes plantings similar in type, size and quantity to those in place in nearby developments, in order to create a sense of thematic continuity in the area'. Plantings along the periphery of the site will be extended to include the Puget Power substation property -- vegetation and berming at the boundary of the site will provide a visual barrier to screen the site for passers- by in order to mitigate such impacts as light and glare from parking areas and from exterior lighting standards. 3) Transportation For discussion of on-site and off-site traffic (vehicular and pedestrian) impacts see Section G.4 . f. 4) Natural Environment There is no development on the subject site presently (save for the Puget Power substation on a distinct section of the parcel) . The undeveloped portion of the property is covered with vegetation -- grasses, shrubs and second growth trees -- which are determined by staff not to be significant. The wildlife habitat which may be supported by the existing vegetation will be replaced by a wildlife habitat (as required by Code) included in the landscaped area. Landscaping provided by the proponent for the complex, and the wildlife habitat should serve to provide an attractive view corridor and effective visual buffer for passers-by and for employees of abutting developments. 5) Public Services and Utilities These impacts are presented in Section G.4 . i. below. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site: Impacts from the proposed development have been identified in the following areas: earth, water, aesthetics, transportation, natural environment, environmental health; public services and utilities. These impacts are discussed below: 1) Earth/Water As noted in Section G.4.c. l. of this report, the subject property is a filled site, in an area which may be subject to flooding. In order to adequately protect the complex in the case of flooding, rigorous requirements have been established for storm drainage management systems, landscaping (berming and plants which are flood resistant) , and permeable surface plans for this site in conjunction with environmental review See Sections G.2 . , G.4 .c. and G.4 . i. of this report) . 2) Aesthetics As well as being compatible with neighboring developments, the proposed office complex has been designed and/or recommended to be a pleasant place which is efficient and functional for employees and visitors. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO "'HE HEARING EXAMINER The Austin Company PUBLIC HEARING Augu,st 8, 1989 Page 8 Exterior materials have generally been selected for their attractiveness and durability; aluminum and glass materials are appropriate, however, dry-vit stucco will need to be replaced with the more durable standard stucco. Interior amenities and outside amenities (e.g. exercise room, lounge, cafeteria, walking paths, outside dining areas and seating areas) have been provided to serve employees. Plantings have been selected and planned to be placed in a manner which provides an attractivelviewscape. In conjunction with environmental review and site plan review, on-site transportation systems (accesses, drop-off areas, parking, circulation routes foripedestrians and vehicles) are designed or have been recommended to be designed to be safe and efficient. Exterior on-site lighting has been proposed (or will be recommended) to be pedestrian-scaled and to include a sufficient number of fixtures to adequately illuminate the site in away which ensure safe passage for pedestrians and vehicles. 3) Transportation For discussion of on-site and off-site traffic (vehicular and pedestrian) impacts see Section G.4. f. 4) Natural Environment As noted in Section G.4 .c.4 . above, the subject property does. not include significant vegetation. Landscaping and the small required wildlife preserve to be provided in conjunction with this development is anticipated to provide an attractive environment on the site which provides passive and active recreational opportunities for employees. 5) Public Services and Utilities These impacts are presented in Section G.4 . i. below. 6) Environmental Health The subject property surrounds a site which is developed with a Puget Power substation. The substation currently generates 115 kV of power; according to Puget Power there are no plans to increase the levels of power generated. The proponent has located the office complex and related amenities (e.g. outdoor eating area) sufficiently distant from the substation so that electromagnetic impacts do not exceed 100 milligaus, in order to protect the safety of employees and visitors to the complex. e. Conservation of Area-wide property values: The proposed office park complex is not expected to have a negative impact on property values in the area since the project will result in: 1) development of now vacant parcels, leading to an inherent increase in property value; and 2) the development of a project structures, landscaping, amenities) which is designed to be compatible with uses on neighboring properties. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The proposed 199, 000 square foot office complex is proposed to employ approximately 1050 persons and to receive approximately 50 daily visitors. ITE reports indicate an estimated 2845 ADWVTE. This rate of travel is anticipated to have a notable impact on the site, as well as on the abutting rights-of-way (S.W. 16th Street and Lind Avenue South) , and on nearby major travel routes (East Valley Highway, Grady Way, Rainier Avenue. S.W. 43rd Street) . For example, levels of service. At present, level of service at S.W. PRELIMINARY REPORT T '- '"HE HEARING EXAMINER The Austin Company PUBLIC HEARING August 8, 1989 Page 9 16th Street and Lind Avenue is acceptable; the proposed project would not, in itself, reduce service to an unacceptable level at that intersection; the likelihood of reduction of service levels, through cumulative impacts was identified. Similarly, staff noted that levels of service at nearby Grady Way/Rainier Avenue are at D" in morning peak hours and at "E" in evening peak hours; levels of service at East Valley Highway and S.W. 43rd Street are at "F" in morning peak hours and at "E" in evening peak hours. Based upon the likely substantial type/level of impact from the proposed development to the'' site and the area roadways (where service levels range from marginal to poor at peak hours) , the Environmental Review Committee developed a comprehensive series of mitigation measures to address these concerns. (See Section G.2 . ) . For example, off-site traffic circulation impacts are anticipated to be reduced by the development of a TMP for this project, by the improvement of a nearby public transit service point, by the encouragement of ride-sharing, by a drop-off center adjacent to the office building, by limiting on-site parking spaces/providing a system to reserve an area for an increased number of parking spaces at a future date, and by additional, similar systems to encourage more efficient travel to the site. On-site vehicular circulation systems, too, will be improved by the provision of a limited number of parking stalls for individual commuters and by the addition of bicycle parking areas, by the provision of several access points -- possibly including a joint access route on the southeastern perimeter of the property --, and by the provision of well-demarcated, illuminated parking areas. Pedestrian safety, likewise, is anticipated to be ensured by the provision of marked pedestrian walkways throughout the site and linking the site to adjacent rights-of-way. Illumination of pedestrian walkways and parking areas is also to be provided. (See Section G.2 . ) . Finally, City plans to improve rights-of-way in the vicinity of the subject property -- e.g. expanded access ways to S.R. 405 -- should serve to mitigate cumulative impacts from area development. g. Provision of Adequate Light and Air; The development has been designed and sited so that the five-story complex is generally well-separated from neighboring developments to reduce shadow impacts. Similarly, design and location of structural doors and windows, and outdoor areas are intended to provide for maximum light and air circulation both within the office building and in the open areas (service and recreation) on the site. h. Mitigation of Noise, Odors, and Other Harmful or Unhealthy Conditions: 1) Construction Construction of the proposed office complex is expected to generate considerable noise, dust and debris, and traffic impacts. Mitigation measures related to construction impacts have been recommended by the Environmental Review Committee, including erosion control systems, limited hours of operation and haul routes, and site clean-up systems. 2) Operation The proposed office development is not anticipated to generate noise beyond that anticipated from an office complex which is estimated to employ approximately 1050 persons. On-site noise is expected to be contained through mitigating measures as proposed by the proponent or recommended by staff, including interior insulation, and a TMP which will limit the number of f PRELIMINARY REPORT TO =__S HEARING EXAMINER The Austin Company PUBLIC HEARING August 8, 1989 Page 10 cars travelling to the site, concomitantly reducing traffic-related noise. Similarly, sounds from the adjacent rights-of- way and nearby industrial/office complexes are anticipated to be mitigated by interior insulation, as well as by the set backs of the proposed structure and recreation areas from those abutting uses. Because the site is proposed to be used as an office complex, no noxious odors or other unhealthful conditions are anticipated. i. Availability of Public Services and Facilities to Accommodate the Proposed Use: Development of the proposed office complex, with recommended environmental conditions (Section G.2 . ) and land use mitigation measures (Section G.4. ) is not generally expected to create an undue burden on public services and facilities in the area. For example, utilities lines (water, sewer) are available to serve the proposed development. Storm water management systems will need to be designed to address soil characteristics, the proximity ofwetlands, and the existence of a nearby floodplain, as well as being required to be compatible with the existing area storm run- off management systems. The Public Works Department staff has indicated that such a system can be developed; conditions required in conjunction with environmental review (See Section G.2. ) are viewed as sufficient to ensure the development of a viable storm water management system. On-site amenities are being proposed to provide recreational amenities for employees, including such improvements as an exercise room, walking trails, bicycle parking areas, and passive open space. Additionally, Fort Dent Park is approximately one mile from the site and the City is planning a linkage to the municipal bicycle trail system in the vicinity of the site. Police and Fire Prevention Bureau representatives indicate that only the customary number of service calls is anticipated in conjunction with this development; standard mitigation measures, such as signage, secondary access routes, hydrants, are anticipated to be sufficient to ensure efficient provision of emergency services. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposed facility is expected have a generally positive impact on surrounding properties and on the local area as a whole by providing for attractive, functional use of the site and by effective mitigation of off-site impacts. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner approve the 199,000 square foot office park complex proposed by the !Austin Company (File 030-87) with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide plans to address all conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee on June 7, 1989,in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits fortheproject. 2 . That the applicant provide a plan for exterior materials which utilizes standard stucco finishing (rather than dry-vit stucco) , or a product of similar attractiveness and durability. 3. That the applicant provide a landscaping performance bond in the amount of $3, 000.00, to be valid for a period of three years,subject to approval by the City Attorney. 1 1 IL.0........... ......-• 1......'i::::::::‘P.sL.. 1 1 1 til . 7- --.. I ' 0 I1_11111111ur- - ill.' bs.t'i C-11 0Iffiii .,1:1 i..: .c _ •1 5%6 I 1 I-1110 .rn i5.1 •.s1-• N02.r.....--/"--(12- Jill.Milk or 5„ 01:,-(.. T rill.;Pill. • 08` I 1 lij-•' 0111111111111 -nt. 1 1[01114 yi711cm-- 1' i------ ---" \. C41911)-( 1 . Oil 011101 ,- -I- I' it- 1"). 1111111111 1 I It [fl . ' 1'311". 4011.. Carl1-1141 afl, , 0111:51.11 .gio 0 -Ay', i i iii fj Will Ril T' 1 •AO. F F-;;;•-i'ii.--E. i ---------- ' \ 4** . u.).=_..,4.. 50, r- • • •,!f•• • ____• t.--7-•i ' 5--- -i., 3 7- T.z z--: a.„ 1111151".diL111115 -III i II:l .L-7-----= ; -----1.--- , n_._, 7-- --.• =-11-7=-- ,.. f 71-Mi kVITUF 1' s. 1 ,, SI 4 111111 >J1.11,..y!IALW 11.7_I".....'--1.t.,..'r.: 1. I! '711 W ay I\c.:a --- ----44..TT=:4) lk) I ..7---1-7.----.- ' ••• a• s• 4 t. C tk Nz 0 4Al0 12141N-\--- h d)-- Q 2 Li 4 41 • 5 f 4 1 ss 3 I -_____--_,-,n_ •-..1:1H___.-____ThnU. 41 _ 1 —• I 1 ii- • i I 80 t9 st 0 I. =:I:,' . --..- — - :----- # G- 1 10 •7 7 •2.-:=,4 7---• ::.7 7 4- ....-. •tjI0UMpft----- -----2-,i.,..___ —--1I '6ci 4.! I___..:-1 - !..I --.T., __:.=.4 i-.7.__ CC 7 5 .E 7•.=:. p -. - _-_--- AUSTIN COMPANY - SA-030-89, ECF APPLICANT THE AUSTIN COMPANY TOTAL AREA 8 . 8 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS LIND AVENUE AND SW 16th STREET EXISTING ZONING - OP EXISTING USE VACANT . PROPOSED USE OFFICE BUILDING COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS LOCATED AT S .W. 16th STREET AND LIND AVENUE s 1 1 a 1 i___J .,..„,.., 7 a .00 I ,.goo ea,.•.. ..:,. , .-:.. i,i.i.i.:......;.:.,............ ripI 31ilri \ la;- ' '666666. .6.• '''')., .,::. r.:::: A tgo°.g.. • • • • • .• • • • • • ao\ w• • .. '.:...e ffiii ir... r 1 .00.0. • • • • • • • • • • ,• • .abx„- 000go ,r, la, o o°o a0000o. n , lOb... ,ii ro, ,7,0gogo: , • • • • • ,6,6,6 , 1 , ,6 yr111111:igg'g , mi ii o0,000go, • • • • • • g°g°g4°.• • ••••.•.•• .•.•.•6 6•••;•6•.• %:. .'ii::i:' 111111i4VIIII 1 11 1K.' ' 0 000 0 0If/fgg.ggggVA , • • • • • • • • • • • • • :. : i-•, ., 1: Pogogogoglt v • see ••••••• • • loia• •••• ,. ..i..q..4,111:1., iii4tilll r. m .000000000n n nmal ,,, • • • • • • • • • r.•:, ; .•liemu' Amos Nkt0000 •yP • • • 7. ii30011, .:.'41•40. t.;:: i ef..?1, v,ogog02030. 10. • • • • • •_•_• ••••••••• :;,, ItIrM V.ggeg,i'gig. • •••••••• 6.6.0... ingse ,...:I 1.1110 '.44 11111111bal E‘Mg•c),$1?,,,,. .. •••••••,r••• 0 eolio.• • 1,...1. g: 1.• t,.,, Anng,40- 001K P -°g1s)3gog I.e.'''.II0?0?: Nit-11111111.10ig:000 .,i p.....411.',..:?,*.gkgg: . • • R . •:•:•:•••: ":-• , 0 0. v ff...„.•.. ' ,%him." ..r..._ Fi::::::.rA:•:.,.:1.,i:::::::.4;rill,lisklo0.0.4000. &goo 1 .-------... ii • • • • • •• i•,:V1.1g•ggiPaeilgoi:1 ••••• Ltinilill gle.o.vtlei ...11 1110.11"14VIIN'' .311 0 ..0. , k '.. 1,._00 . . . • • „ on 411,1 • 144 • 46 .tqlliqii gogogogogo,. egogogogog. li;.a.,?;IINI lk ;i. • ggggsggggggA :gogo? itgalljillit-,61 e;fir °!'( 4. 1`'1.41 ec 1.141a ti miiiimioiseht,n 0_0_0_0. 00.0. 411111t. ..*1::: AU) I ja11 LBO 402,0.0,zogogol p.og.4._111111130,101iii. iff 9 AN MggRigoggog°0°.*.(k. 'gilt! 11.112' ° ElW r/ qt,,.... ...siiiii I I.., N• . o0000 40000000o.. t'..., eL I v o:307111,11 1 4.A gogog000gogogogogo. 00; VIRRORY 01. .. , ,. ,,igggggg;: 011A: li _ . 0.0,0_,ki,.,,,,ft 1.1 Arno A no • •-.....,,...)•..11 IN .. r ipiNkitinv........ a....4or40::::::= 141Mo.T. 0:::. , 6\ 1.7;43, 14.... ii, .,:. b..."ill1111lirligi..gri IT itifi:..,. 4 r-. k135. 44111111111W MP ..0,.. Mi akattiLI•INN1141-41. ... 01.,,, c.,,..,:-.4,...416. 0-0 0- . ,11....,4140,1,e-•••,,- r; a ....,.. A.,3,0.,,,,i) ‘, . 00.00.0.0 Aim r.... . .4ito• __pi., ..,., 41 f,I IIsi'`I.".1.: I• ll.' 44 Uri $ 44, .:114) d Lig o 0 o 0 0 otilit wig hitko,ct. • C/ . c,lifi iiii: .g,°ogogo2o2o":::o P.'.• • I ii. ;el. '. ,'•''",f. .4....., ''•1,/,„( ' 57%.1.11:464,31i 11: 1 im a II ii.R0000.00.04 Au 1:1;,,i, ••re..,v •..., 4,64.Pg-zi,\::,,,,,Q114,-,. ...... •rit e lb SRO RV Al •0• • / ... 21.. .::::::•33:::::::•:•:•.... ' • C 0;,tV111111IONIllIllipIIII:f... -*in mosii.,z-z-Awgh....0:: :on,Am1. 1'. 0. ••.' -, 4711111h.‘ •,• • •,o.t?a• ,• ,,iiiiiiiiiiMaiii:i::::......,, les.'•r;,..a.„,9„.! 4:‘,%, i 4 imattriaimuininuan:Iglintilti:....• •,,... .• • _,,k i....:::. i:::ii::i:i:iiiim: ::mi::::.:..).-..1:4;60.,,,,f,,,,,:cs,,41, 44, • 7.,,,,armmen,usepsiclespnetleer. ..ftii• ,•.,,,,,s. C.4s„i4:-....::::::,:*::::::::::::::::::::::,.......:1.: ....:)..,\, ,.;..:411.6=.:,... 4.kiz iir ,1,-,..4.0.4••pid.........limmiirmim.?A .,;:,•,:4,5 v.:•,,.• ,. 1.ekP :::::.::::::::::::::::•:.:•:.:.:•••• -- , ,.14' ,. tt• •-•-:•D. i gum cackcs• •.R•11111.AR .111111110!./111 II 1?,...5.1., %CV.'t'••1:4:wn ki:gi:x:i::::.::.v. •,•.i'.V. %R)i c.'.P;..t• r"1.k\AVUUUUUU•SIRismusi%• ,IIIIIINIR UR .RIIRIMIR IV 5.;,...-0, •ai:::i:i*i:if::i::.*i ,-...,.. r?, •• __-_-_-__ r vc,. .. •4:„„,.... 0 of? i UUUUUmaroon . ..111!!!!!!!t•UMW./..... N AI UM ';m:Will!". ri ill I e6'..6.;• 1Wil•Vt"g Il•C9;To?•;,•;. N.C,•.•cf•(•• 1•:::::::::::::::::::::::::: I$1 _______ 4.:,:.: 4/1 Ali IIIMIMMMMM11011•111. '•..iOi S'.....1.ti li.I, .c:• •.:41'-'••1 ...;t'...1• -4I -- -- ----- Ci', '':'::::::::::::::::::1:::::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:........,:i rusnomismi. ,i,••• ..4:v.:,* , NI. • 6"Y.',"1;•, ••Vs. . '' c --- .-•r.o':'•----------- -..' ..***,•:::::*:::::•::::::::::::::'.::::::::::::::.A.L.1.mmmm III kUll-e• ;•I';?*:•1? M:•:•::' '' o'..,o,.1•:;•-.: *.l...P."--;r4)...7_7:-.-K.---..-1--_-!'•••,L .:::i:iiiiiiin..:iiiiiiiiiiii'•1 h 1 UllevageM001; 111i 111. ..:(1';! IP' 'VZ.,.k ,,,, . 1.,,,r•go. ), V .., • •.' J ^ ------.------. .4.. •..%:'::••:::::::::::::::1 HI mmmmmmmm pi .'kitgaiI00,1 014i''.5.;2.°1.4"-2,,;•,,-- 1';'''••••"?.:-,,;;-?..-; ;"._-_11,113-_ _Atif_O_ ==_-_-__- "4"-.....::.,"-..,Apinerannil PPMMIJI r.OF 9:...-.•,. As 4f•Ns.:,,”4.•,...51:,1•:, MAI 4'.•,:?:iiib.•‘,;11116' - ----"`49 fiker--- - Inngligill I,',•••‘+•.' ,''•,4v•1511 4--:-.7-:.--2.--=-:-_?' .-7--- 1;1:: ---_-•-•-_--_-2--_-•-•....=_-± = -1--7...-:.-1. UN I ii0A- -•ralgoImp_jmo,_).83000.0... .7__-_-_-_-_-_-__ _ -_ -_-_-. L..... AMOR '00c 111111111RNE ' 00000Ilkk A t''' .-:t.', „,,*d,•:'•,'.... 2; 0. 4.". 0::•••III.r v0000. rA•C.C.''k-I..•,.,;(. 0 0 0 000 0000 b. ..,,.---.----1111111 4111:11 :g2g om consmass•-o- lo-Imams 0guar: lammmam:•-•: imilimpa4- .••.c."; (,.. ----- 0000000000 •-• ----- - ez-mcr 1:::.11 ,.._,..,.. .... ..iv•-•ts., ..,.....•. . . o00000.00.0.0....,„. ___________ ____.__ 1,311.„inzume.mmmmm. i .... ,•,-..,,, I.'... • ii ..i.,'r.:‘.1:liflt!"6•g.3...0•. .,--1.7_.';•00°00:000:000°00:0:0:0:0:00 7_•-_•-. .--.._ : -:;;;;;allk TOO iLii iinla11111: 1,Mili:::.."f•IN'i.(6:•L,''\;..';'''',A.:‘...'":' W1.: (iCret6- s• . '--%-P.00000D00000000. ,-;-_-_-_-_-_ INIIMINIImmmmm IIIIAlinli k ..:•••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:.1.,;t,43,...\:......4.e. •0 S.,.Or.,W,0.000.00000.0000000.000001006 F..1 _:-._-_:..7 „trinfif f111P- 1113 , ge nikunagiss pg ,/ :0:•;:iiggi:,:iiligi y..,..Wig"••••'" .qet,,..„--- \._ •00.0000.0094:600%.00.0.0., 41.--.,.,-.- , ...__ ---iiir1co00600.9)0.o...:32. 6 .....•,,_-_- _-.,,f-„,-,ei.,,ojz ,m_ pr 1103111114,11 ,' ildmiiiii:iiiiiiiiimi:i: .a.,,., 6,„:........,•• ,. luau" •.•••••........,-,. - - •••••sy.'•." • ,:iil:', ..§1;-... -,•••• A..., ...... ... i_-_- _-.•ottil-fraidilmo•ii,11,. NINE••:':•:.:,i,:i.fliMiN:Mi::j;c`:4 f ..„...- ,..1:-..am\vital2ciazeis V., 000.. .. il 6 . .-• t ••••• •0.0.,,,•' "•• r 411!, 44::• 16.::i*:':..:*i:i:M• ..?..,•:1,.. "• Co.".7 • 4:IONEN0:011111-iiim tal yosam• • •":„ ,711-tl----::1=2:::"7::.±2--ff.A.' =---- -,i, '' illir ....° .101.• Nitne:t: 7_---7_-- -------- t--- '2) 1 Lit etIlkix. Ai::mmmmm: iiiiii! --,_-:- _I III .O :•:•:•:•:•:•:•. •,I I 111b....... ltp .::::::;,,c, -_-- Inca-.•Aoc,o,.-_-_-_ '•:,,;,... 1 • • oo ,m •:•:.:•:•:.:•:•:•.• • 11 mu I .6.%, .ilitsin 1 rirsms, - - ----_•00.0.0...-_-_-_ ',......n- r li• aMR MN1IIMI ROM II -_---_000,__ • „...,111111:11•111101 c.1 AI en. 0 igI1 Al •.. _ 0,..0,c, s, i)..i.:.:„:i , ......„. _____ _.___=__ .___.......... ..„,..,.,, ii .-.1 t.T.,1,•••..a.rii,mi. -.••• 1 1--:-.:- --•--" , ..°0%.%:°°.•C.:W.' ''.rr'l 11:1:i.:0.00.00 -,,\ 1 0....0. AEI.usa t'i,,,- 1 0.0000 ...,• •• TAR•4 ARM%.•-••:ill A:7 0000000 (3` MISR Mill •2•,;••,IS RIR!,,_ L•Z-. -:-_-=-7.-=7-----------6: •,1::•,;' •o 0 o• ,s l•000000. f•.o°o%o°0°°o°oT•i lab. ,1111 OM 1 r•;..1 R111011 1•• ',-I2,:; ausame mmmmmm ( ---__ __-_ --_--_-- •0_,..., n., 1ir.....1._ : r!Y.;17.5''''',''''..'s:•".f:. - ----:---- --------- 5•" i c'1,.• - `if. 'Enre.-,-' .0 J•••'!'•'• • .n.. S•,;....-,;.69;.,•;:5':.i.: _-__-_-.-_-_-_-_-=-1- l',.'r,qi 1 : ,, e..,0.41.••':. ...,:•„:124..,_•-•-.:,• --------------------1 iN7.. ..... . ere C.:.."•----------------C''...:3",;S'° .:- -------------------- i •.••• 1 i 20%f i• Irk • t-..,•,. cp.-. I e 7,kt, LAND USE ELEMENT 1, 3::::•:,"•%::.lailiallailk. L.s_, 0,:,,, c,. •1 i:i:::if..iiiiinililii:•.18111111•11111111% lk 1 MUM I f Single Family i I Commercial 0000. ,.,..3 ,.tr.., 01....t.:leran.,•:•:•:•.•:•:•:::::::::::::::::::;VlEprtP3INP73A00000,, "••;.:•44. • .. ••••, pok.,,,44-4%4600000•• ..-• ,,,m. 1-.1 0000•• •..„•:, 14, sof. ,...Low Density i3.30 00.II 000 . • •4,1 ••:,It. ,,,....,Office / Office Park 0. 0I. ••••*•••••••• Multl-Family k\.. c.... :.:•:•••:•:, ,•.y." 'fl.' E y o oo o0 o• •::::*::::::. ••;.,••,,..:.9.,..,-, eac00000000000. •:]*:*:::. ;,..7,.:.-.: I 00 9 00000• :•:•:.:•:•:•:. ..-f",'":1•,•. 90000000 0•00000• ...:•:...:•:•• ••'.02.9..C.44MediumDensity0. 0•0.0.• :: ..:.:::.:•• ..,i,.R„..„,„,:..,;... 0.0.000.00m. Public/Quasi-PublicMulti-Family .000.3.0. o• -3.-•r:',D•.''2%0:-W.:V.) •-.:-.,.........................0000000. 1%4. ‘„••••••••••••••P - -- .•:,4.., 1 o,, ky.,:•:•%:;:::;:p.::I I---m High Density Light IndustrialMulti-Family I- viouououi'4?..0'..:::•:4.::;'.4. 0000oc.oc it •14.1,r;j:c., yV•k t....... bi Recreation Heavy Industrial A it Greenbelt 1 1 vgipGbeltManufacturingPark .1 6... .... 1MultipleOption I ImvitWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: .. ""3Torvv-\` u,"- APPROVED APPROVED WITH COND ONS NOT APPROVED FAZINC. PIC'n DATE 5/5/r, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 DATE: May 4, 1989 TO: Jeanette McKague, Senior Planner FROM: Garth Cray, Storm Water Utility Engineering. 0 SUBJECT: G.S.A/F.A.A. Office Building We have the following comments on the environmental review for the subject project: 1. The 100-year flood plain, as F.E.M.A. determines it, is based upon existing conditions only and does not address future development in the valley. Under future development conditions, without the P-1 Project in place and improvements made to the Green River Levees, it is possible that the site would be in the 100- year flood plain. This issue must be addressed. 2. Water quality needs to be addressed through the use of baffled oil/water separators and biofiltration of the drainage prior to release. We are very concerned about the amount of impervious area on the site. The site plan needs to incorporate allowance for biofiltration. 3. Should the existing drainage system capacity be able to carry a 25-year storm peak flow, the detention required will be 10-year with a 10-year release rate. If it is determined the system is under capacity for the 25-year storm, then the release rate will be controlled by the capacity of the system (what year storm can the existing system handle without flooding) and detention will be for the 25-year storm. The pre and post development outflow should match for the lower flows as well as the final design storm (Example: for the 10-year design, the release rate should match for the 2-year storm as well as the 10-year.) The design should be performed using S.C.S. unit hydrograph method and a 24-hour duration. S/G/GSA-FAA/GDC:lf CITY OF FiEN iON MAY 5 1989 i111,V• 1 LE4j, Yi(oviDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENTDEPARTMEN `IY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 3, 19 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED PP1/4 7divVeL f.e3eZ j SIG ATURE DATEOFD 7IRECTORJORAUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVEr ` " REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED k APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED d c-40/4- o 23 v DATE V--17SIGNATUREOFECTORORAUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE REVV 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Q(,"_ pr.event-om APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development andfor construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi-nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fir Department access roads/lanes shallminimumwidth20'; minimum height 13' No pavedgYes.,... Preliminary fire flow calc ations show a fire flow of n2 D isrequired. hydrants with a minimum flow of O v-i) ,gpm eachisrequired. Primary hydrant is required to be within 5Q feet of the structure.Secondary hydrants are required to be within 30 d feet of thestructure. An approved automatic sprinkler s is required to protect the total structure. Yes No,All fire department access roads ace to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No._All fire hydrants are required to be atmtalatd app d prior to construction. Yes X No SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTUO 1, DATE p2/9FT ,Ffl PFPRT'r ,r t n r i i.a V1i,..1i V LJL't"tlitil`LL'LV1 L'LV1:1VN: Y' f/C G-I 7//7eE3p^/hy APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDI' NS NOT APPROVED See attachment. DATE 7 7SIGNATUREOFDIRECTORORATHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 THE AUSTIN COMPANY GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING 1 . Assessment for Burlington Industrial Park Benefit Zone. Office Space 199,000 Code - General Office 710 Trip Rate 13.72 per 1,000 sq. ft. Assessment amount $197.00 per trip 13.72 x 199,000 = 2,730.28 total trips generated1,000 197.00 x 2,730.28 . = $537,865.16 - Transportation Benefit Zone Assessment Fee 2. Building required to have a commuter information center. Also preferential parking space is to be assigned to multi-occupantvehiclesandvanpooluses. 3. Developer to work with Metro to provide a bus shelter on the west sideofLindAve. SW nearest to site. 4. Driveway width to be 30' . 5. Existing street light in proposed driveway off Lind Ave. SW to be relocated by a City approved lighting contractor and not just removedasshownonplan. 6. SW 16th Street - Lind Ave. SW to Raymond Ave. SW overhead powerdistributionconductorsbelow55KVtobeundergroundedandplacedunderneaththeproposedsidewalk. The developer will need to provideforthisundergroundingarrangementwithPugetSoundPower & LightCompany. One spare 2-inch conduit will need to be provided for future street lighting which will be installed when SW 16th Street roadwayimprovementsareinstalledaspartoftheCity's Six-Year ImprovementProgram. 0 Future street light conduit will need to terminate in a B-type junction box every 200 feet with junction box placed at back ofsidewalk. 7. Lind Ave. SW - a right turn deceleration lane needs to be provided fordrivewayapproach. Submittal of design plans required. oh-1 0 CITY 'OF RENTON wiLL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division MEMORANDUM Date: May 12, 1989 To: Don Erickson Lenora Blauman From: Clint Morgan Subject: The Austin Company GSA/FAA Office Building Please amend the Plan Review Comments on the above referenced proposed development as follows: 3 Revise Plans review item No. to read as follows: SW 16th St. - Lind Ave. SW to Raymond Ave. SW overhead power distribution conductors below 55KV to be undergrounded and placed under or - behind the sidewalk. The developer will need to provide for and make those arrangements with Puget Sound Power & Light Company. Remove reference to future street light conduit. Provide for channelization of a center lane two way left turn lane at the driveway entrance off Lind Ave. SW. Channelization plans to be submitted. 3,. Provide for street lighting on SW 16th St. Plans to be coordinated with City proposed street improvements on SW 16th St. Submit drawing for approval. 4 SW 16th St. - Provide vehicle turn-out in front of building for drop-off of passengers on SW 16th St. Show plan on drawing. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 u ,,k i 0, ..,.. :..ilJ r} 1' fir•}., Jy, , fi i lr 4' JubuLb'1•luj REGARDING' THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED INWRITING. PLEASE PROS"-'---E COMMENTS, TO THE PLANNIr )IVISION OF THDEVELOPMENTDEPARTMEI ,BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 3 1Sy. E COMMUNITY• REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED UTlllry APPROVAL SUDIECT TD GOlt1tE M•s CI1 C/ h%4,t,[j A1TACNED ''RiN TSLATECOMERSA6REENlEIIT-Y:';'-'i ~'-" t/ S W `.4z D /X J.Z.., Q= 1 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SE::=Z T S /t!'• : SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CIiI;I;C- ;;:, 7` SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ChAR:E EI E;I X JZ3, 3erLO' )`/SS;333.1Z SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CII ^sE-WATERM .X S,33.5./a SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CI:122E- APPROVED WATER PLAN SEWER 3Q! lil0. 2g 4PPR5YED SEWER PLAN APF(;OYED FIRE HYDRANT LUCATIU:=S gar PEG bIILE iF .S O SEW ii INsSµLED -rn 6hIThour rr NN - 9BYFIREDEPT. 11111 7F17,7''" A:IALYSIS sustcnieb PREITniNAty -PcANs AR£ NET APPROUEp.tctSIGNATUREOFDIREORORA u^ DATE IZ 87RIZEDREPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 GT,d- : 5/12/$9 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L 3-8'9tL APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVEDeytuklfl\IL U o ti h o q -4-vI vokot (AA- Pu,k,k_Cv< a_vt d e cubovt o Woktc..c.vIr 2r vus --14 VU Ltic 0 r .12,•tticc..v>_ act, to (41 p6ty&A.b wtva.v c e CCos u v* vtA CI"pay-LC, i 131tUU r SIGNATURE DIFTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE U REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 14114AMMIA)60, blutsloiq. APPROVED APPROVED WITH : CONDITIONS ` 1 NOT APPROVED P C;.01M MENQ puK-I rrut), 'PQa'xflo RY'p 10 p U ®- 'n. I KIrUV LeffINFO Alet65357Pdub `641 1,b 70 (bd StGtiS51 vgTIitP110005t0ploiNu11rv65stemuu6Il,'.r°1 Itv(, 7 1 r , FOR. Sc SI,.p SuG sT' Ir.cR s c,E c ui n v+G. Wo 1,n1vGz)Z L oF L ,,lIti05cApitwo tMrIG`f IF I IZ IC 1 U gr 114L g, t G . S 1 1,,b 13 'R,®VIb r, nl or c, IS,N, P N SI4pVV I 'RoUt car T'I I r r ,! sup , T1i YY1(1 5 51 Ve t pgl lt 1" c' y iu o LNoo 5G At APPROVED 41u' 'Z v"fieAPPROVEDWITHCONDI )NS NOT APPROVED rye a, 4er, SIG TUR I DATE RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 DATE: May 11, 1989 TO: Lenora Blauman FROM: John Morris SUBJECT: Austin Company - GSA/FAA Office Building There are several issues related to this project that need to be addressed: I.RECREATION A. The applicant has provided no active or passive recreation facilities on- site. This is unacceptable in light of the recreation needs of the one thousand or so employees who will occupy the site, nine to ten hours a day. B. The applicant has not provided indoor recreation or shower facilities which would make possible a larger variety of employee recreation activities either before work, at noon, or after work. C. The issue of off-site recreation impacts should also be addressed by the applicant. These impacts have historically been mitigated either through contributions to a recreation fund or through the development of a variety of off-site recreation. facilities. 2.TRANSPORTATION A. There is.no on-site pedestrian circulation system to or from the sidewalk and to or from the west parking area. B. Bicycle parking and locking facilities need to be provided close to the entrances. C. South West 16th Street is a designated bike route, so a five foot on-street bicycle travel lane (including the gutter) needs to be provided for. These lanes will serve both recreation and commuter riders, especially those who will be using the Springbrook Trail bike route through the valley. A general comment in terms of site design. The streetscape will be enhanced the closer the building is sited to it. The current site plan separates the building from the street with four rows of parking on the north side and two rows of parking on the east side. i RENL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D)E : _ TMENT UI/ISIUidDEVELOPMENTAPPLICATIONREVIEWSHEElFYOFRENTON ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-030-89 APR 1 8 1989 I)PROPONENT: The Austin Company E C I O V PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build afivestory (199, 000 square foot) loffice building on an 8.8 acre parcel intheOfficeParkZone. (Note: applicant seeks to provide 853 parkingspaces; staff has advised that this number of spaces is in excess of Coderequirements, and that it is likely that a recommendation will be made forareducednumberofspaces -- applicant has elected to proceed withevaluationoftheprojectwiththeexcessnumberofspacesretained for thepresent. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED INWRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENTBY5: 00 P.M. ON May 3, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 01 q444.rxir PIAfthlAPPROVEDAPPROVEDWITHCONDITIONS NOT APPROVED SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE #21(el REV. 6/88 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-030-89 PROPONENT: Austin Company DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199, 000 square foot office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from June 12, 1989 . Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , June 27, 1989, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: June 12 , 1989 DATE OF DECISION: June 7, 1989 SIGNATURES: Ken Ny etg Lyn G ttman Community Development Director Public Works Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: GSA/FAA Building ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-030-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199 , 000 square foot office building on an 8 . 8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street RECOMMENDATIONS:Issue a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide a revised site plan, including 770 parking spaces (with 83 parking spaces identified as being held in reserve and developed with landscaping and/or recreational amenities, subject to the approval of the Planning Division and Traffic Engineering Division. Note: After it has been established that an operable Traffic • Management Plan has been in effect for at least one year, the Zoning Administrator shall carry out an evaluation of on-site parking at the applicant's request. If the Zoning Administrator determines that there is an apparent need for additional on-site employees parking, he may release any or all of the parking heldinreserve. 2 . That the applicant provide a revised on-site exterior lighting plan, including a combination of planned 30 foot high exterior lighting fixture and pedestrian-scaled lighting fixtures sufficient to illuminate the office structure, parking area,landscaped areas, recreation areas, and site periphery, subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 3 . That the applicant be required to provide a plan for traffic management, subject to the approval of the Traffic EngineeringDivision, including, but not limited to: a. Assessment for Burlington Industrial Park Benefit Zone. 560,465. 00 Transportation Benefit Zone Assessment Fee. 2 ,845 trips generated at $197 . 00. b. Building required to have a commuter information center. Also preferential parking space is to be assigned to multi- occupant vehicles and van pool uses. c. Developer to work with Metro to provide a TSM plan whichincludes: 1) information about, organization of, and preferential treatment for vanpools and carpools; 2) information about and incentives for use of public transit systems; 3) a bus shelter on the west side of Lind Ave. SW nearest to site. This plan is to be approved by the City'sPlanningDivisionandTrafficEngineeringDivision. fliti'yatibn Measures GSA/FAA Building Page 2 d. Driveway width to be 30' . e. Existing street light in proposed driveway off Lind Ave. SW to be relocated by a City approved lighting contractor not just removed as shown on plan. f. Provide for street lighting on SW 16th St. Plans to be coordinated with City .proposed street improvements on SW 16th St. Submit drawings for approval. g. SW 16th St. - Lind Ave. SW to Raymond Ave. SW overhead power distribution conductors below 55KV to be undergrounded and placed under or behind the sidewalk. The developer will need to provide for and make those arrangements with Puget Sound Power & Light Company. h. Lind Ave. SW - a right turn deceleration lane needs to be provided for driveway approach. Submittal of design plans required. i. Provide for channelization of a center lane two way left turn at the driveway entrance off Lind Ave. SW. Channelization plans to be submitted. j . SW 16th St. - Provide vehicle turn-out in front of buildingfordrop-off of passengers on SW 16th St. Show plan on drawing. k. A joint driveway access, if feasible, with the adjoining property to the south of the site (Lind Avenue South) . 1. Signage at the drop-and-ride center indicating a five minute maximum limit for parking on that corridor. m. Marking of the fire lane with striping or signage to prevent vehicle parking along that corridor. 4 . That the applicant install sidewalks, curbs and gutters, lightingandlandscapingalongS.W. 16th Street from the western propertyboundarytoLindAvenueSouth (including the property whichtraversesthePugetPowerSubstation) and from the corner at S.W. 16th Street south along Lind Avenue to the southern boundaryline. (The proponent may prefer to participate in a L. I . D, which would serve to provide financial benefit at some future point fortheinstallationofthoseandrelatedimprovements. ) 5. That the applicant provide: a) on-site bicycle parking facilities; and b) a five foot wide bicycle lane (including gutters) on S.W. 16th Street, in order to facilitate recreational and commuting cyclists. 6. That the applicant be required to provide the following, at the time of site plan/building plan review: a. Specifications for a plan for storm drainage management which includes: a) a detention system which will meet the following two scenarios: i) if conveyance capacity of the existing City storm system is determined to be sufficient in capacity to address a 25 year storm, then the requirement will be ten year detention with a ten year existing conditions release rate, or ii) if the capacity of the existing system is determined to be less than that necessarytoaddressa25yearstorm, the requirements would be for. a 25 year detention system with a release rate being computed under predeveloped conditions for the year storm matchingthecapacityoftheexistingsystem (i. e. if the capacity oftheexistingsystemis2years, then the release rate will be computed on the 2 year storm) ; and b) a water quality protection system with baffled oil/water separators and Iitigation Measures t 1 1 3SA/FAA-Building Page 3 biofiltration prior to the off-site release of any stormdrainage. This plan, which has been authorized in principle, should be subject to approval for specific components by thePublicWorksDepartment. b. l. A flood control management system which includes a plan for:a) siting of the structure at an elevation which would ensure protection of that structure and an emergency vehicle parking area during 100 year flood - (NOTE: the subject site is not in the !existing 100 year flood plain) ; and b) a landscaping system which is designed to enhance erosion/flood control management (e.g. berms, plantingswhichcoverandprotectsoil, etc. ) . This plan should be subject to approval by the City's Storm Water UtilityEngineeringDivision. AND b. 2 . A document which acknowledges that the City has informed the applicant that the subject property is located in an area which may be included in an altered 100 year flood plain assuming the P-1 Channel is not developed) , and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liableforanyfloodingand/or for any damage to property or person arising from such flooding. This agreement should be subject to approval by the City Attorney. AND b. 3 . A containment program for ensuring that materials now (or inthefuture) stored on site are not allowed to contaminatetheunderlyingterrainintheeventofflooding, in order toprotectwetlandareasinthevicinityofthesite. This plan should be subject to approval by the Public WorksDepartment. Note: The site is not currently in the 100 year flood plain, but that plain may change from current FEMA levels depending on drainage alternatives now being considered bytheCity, such as the P-1 channel project) . Note: See 5/4/89 Memo and 6/7/89 Memo from Storm Water Utility Engineering for specifications. 7. That the applicant be required to provide a plan forconstruction, including: a) an erosion control plan; b) a planforwheel-washing of construction vehicles prior to their leavingthesitetocontroldustanddebris; c) a plan for periodicwateringdownofthesitetocontroldustanddebris; d) a planforhaulingroutesandhaulinghourstomitigatetrafficimpacts;and e) a bond of $3, 000. 00 for street clean-up. These plansshouldbesubjecttoapprovalbythePublicWorksDepartment,Police Department, and the Planning Division. Note: At the time of site plan review, the site plan, landscapingplan, recreation plan, and other, related plans, all of which weresubmittedonJune5, 1989, which have been approved in principle mustbeapprovedindetailbyCityrepresentatives. Similarly the parkingplanwillneedtobeapproved. mmdoc ji I I 4 too loo o too 400 In an sommomm. SCALE:i .zoo -o—" HOLIDAY INN ORADY _ IJ jl ISTORMCITYOF WATERRENiONDRAINAGE NOTES I. DEfORE AM CCMTRURtd OR DEVFI61[Mi AR IYITToCCJS.A rN1E-CQ6rRlClla Y:RIw Ym e[1Elp MTH TIE CITY 6 KI0O1[(PARTICNT CF PUBLIC•CANS,DESIGN EKI NEER. TO BELLEVUE_ L. ALL C067RUCT ION Mal BE IN•CL•69.6 MTM TIC 1968 STAGARO SPECIMCATIOG FOR ROW.BRIDE APOTENON,CCNSNATIGN•PREPARED BY Y.S.D.0.1.,ANDea: 00LTEers Trt•1ECITY PUy IC MORES RTNNT Or GRW.A5 AMIGO LIMITED AGGRESS FREEWAY IMERSTATE I, 405 BY LIE art 6 PENrGN xPAa1TENr 6 RELIC RMS. 3.ACMCICOOIIIGG DRAINAGEoTICCAPPROGQ PLANS mopAM CR F TD 1-5 r---AUST I THE APPROFED RAPS PILL REWIRE ORIGIN APPROVAL FPDYINTMDEPARTNNT6RELICICONS.AN,DEVIATIONS FRd H THE,. N i T I [ I EKI1E[R OR HON rtU UTILITY. TIE COT O RENId CEPA/RICO 6 RFiIC WRNS.DESIGN 1II I CORr 6 TIER Ann BANS IAb*BC d TIC Jd SITEI>-'- j I I i(rEv[e ¢taLcila Is P PRouEa.II!^I C(MP Ny , S I< SEATTLE I I' LONCACRES I ELECTRIC I LUT.QER I I s. EATENSLEBE WARINU.S.C.S.MCS°°IICY'S(APPROVEDII. II NDUSTRIAL ''II I I I I PARK I W, I , 6. BOO.. TGEv(IION ARE 107(0 U T. RAID, All S DIN A IOU NOS,d FKTLITIES WS7 BE IN OPERAIIGNJI -- j ---- L__J L_PRIOR 70 CLG0r4 AND WILDING CORS,R,CTIOT.An INT L. ----NAT BC SAT ISFACIEML,0IN:AIND WIT TE£005Cr0GNSW16THSTA TTh sso[D APO rM PR[NIIAL rd pA_sITE[ayslw Y. I oFFCC 1 BULt01= /' OT 4 ` TIC CCPAAT IEr pr Rg:c YDa•s.r.DRN ni[a In TUT, I I 9. AP`RE`P.aP i0 Ma1CMKTINC000AI[[:HAII S[Ci1bVP)-0j XTnGROUPHEALTHIIII FOR ROW Aq BRIDLE GT61RJOGo..THIS SHALL IGLU%NECESSARYCO-OPERATE IVE K THE CARENI STATE CT NASA Nia SIAIbRD SRCIPIG1ION I \\I I I I UM,.Cr FUTAsRAZING at WE a OYI IGGNiIe;N I LCICTN TT(PIPO WILLFR SARPCRRIRACE C'HAT 0ONNED CE16EI LEWILLOW H,ALL PIPE BMW SHAEL BE•PYA CLASS•C',CQ Q i I ---------------- WIT TN(a06.116. T IFP.V C.rPON.ALL TRIO.sra.[NFILmQQ \ \ \\\\ i 3 I I I CILL AND IBE001TG SHIAII BE 6.CAER Aso EmER v,V PER ASTI. .C.PiPE.YCl Q Q \\\ \\==- TO.CALYAN,ZCD PEEL FIFE GO ALU0N17[p STEEL PIPE FOR ALLDRA6FACILO'ES SNTLL MN ASPHALT TRUING.1 0RQQIg ;I I I BETTER 161DE Aq aDislDE. CQ CQ I e ' LOT 2 11.sTRLCilRESWING ISE ANtmsrRffOlow ru rims r[rtraa I LOT 3 ENE TOP O AM crpoLL BAN.WIII<I I 0 Ti.ALL GTd&SIN GRATES SHALL H xP@SSED 0.10 FEET PEON LONfPACRES l I 1 2 T I : NVEIENI LEVEL. I1 Ti.OPEN CUT II A CROSS 55 S EXISTING PUBLICAPART/ID Er ITO1\ VALLEY OFFICE PARK I S MILL IN 6E ALIOKD IICST SPETFICALLT APARp/ID A TMOTT6RENTONDEPARTECNTOFPILi1CKR..DESIGN TWINER. u.MCC rGL ERDSId PROTECTION'S ROADSIDE DIT[,CS.NER Ra1RED.S --- jgj, SHALL DE 6 SONO GARR.ROC.RACED TO•DEPTH O 7 FOOT AqW5TTERTIETDLL0,K SPECIFIC•TICTS•.•-6-/.0.70%PASSIICF7"-•/30i-A0I PASSING:APO-2-ROOVTn-70.6 PASSING.S LEGAL DESCR I PT I ON 15.ALL BUILDING CONVRgI•CS Aq F0071W DRAINS SHALE DE CONACTEDIAlTOTHESTORYDRAINAGESYSTEM.MESS APPR00EO EY ITCI1T P O PARCEL•A' : NPTR(N N6AiElTDWOG.SETDESIGN TWINERRCFF[D 5STOWTORTYNinLOTS2ARC3OFVALLEYCCMICCANDINDUSTRIALPARK-SUBDIVISION No.I. OWNING 6 THISACCURATELY ICTISI .ILL DE SUBYIi1CD i0 TICACCORDINGTOTHESNOWRATRECORDEDVEER61KCOUNTY PECOIDTK 1b.600776901 J. CITY O ROOM AEON COPLETId.I CITY I IW I EICEPr Tn05[PORII06 iNER6 WAVED i0 TIE CITY 6 RER7d 16,ISSUANCE Cr TM WILLOW OR COGTRLCTIGN PERMIT BY THEOFCITY7RENIdDOESNOTRELIEVETMCATEROFNNEDYTTGAIINGJFORSTRUTPURPOSESBrOEEDSRECORDEDEWERREC091KI I RENTON I w•..epD)o7a.w.epp67DDOn AND 67Dn6aJs.: LEGAL OBLIGATION Aq/d LIABILITY NEECTED.ITN STORY I SURFACE TIMER DISPOSITTGN.FURTHER,INC CITY 6 Koos I> SITUATE IN THE CITY 6 RODGN,COIMT 6 EGG,STATE 6 NPSHINGiGN. DxS ICr ACCEPT ANY OBIGTIGN fOR THE PROPER FUNCTIONINGIIAPONAINTENAKE6TIESYSTEMPROVIDEDDOMINGCONSTRUCTION, Ti.TIE COITRAtt07 STALL BE RESPOPSIRE FOR FRW101NG ADEQUATE I W PARCEL •BH SAFEGUARD.SAFTEr DEVICES.PROTECTIVE ECUIPACHT.FLALGCRS, I I T APO,ANY OTHER NEEDED ACTICJAS TO PROTECT THE LIFE MALTH.i LOT 1 Cr VALLEY 6FI[E MO ITI005TRIAL PARE-SVBDIVISTGN PG.I.SUr(Y 6 iM PUBLIC.ASS TO PROTECT PROPERTY III CON:RIOR ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PUT RECORDED LACIER WIG CONIT KITH TM PERYONYICE 6 NOW COVERED 9•THE CdTUC",ANTjCIRECORDINGIb.8002769013: TANK STAIN THE iRALILCD RIFM-0Er-T OAT W!157(00PtZNORLMITRAFFICROTSHALLREQUIREANAA900*C7 TRAFFIC CORNx.I Y EXCEPT TIC EAST 7.0.06 FEET TMRE6; RAN Er TM TRAFFIC EKINEERIK DIVISION 6 TM DEPARIOM V T 6 PI.BLIC VMS.ALL SECTIONS 6 r.S.D.O.i.STANDARD 1 I r— —, O APO EXCEPT TIUT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF PLMd SPECIFICATIONS 1-01-13.TRAFFIC CTMBl SMELL APRT. FT.STREET PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UG[R RECORDING NA,7f07730671Y, I II TO.SPECIAL DR•1PADE lEAStIRCS RILL BE REWIRED IF T,E PROJECTSITUATEINiMCITY6PEnd,COII17T 6 LING STATE 6 1L11NGTGN. LOGTId 15 YITHIN TM Aal(CR RIDTLR IGN AREA. NXICS WTC REVISION RP OND DATE ammo. OP IYNS a THE AUSTIN TG LE 1•a7oo 0 3 TLE VICINITY MAP o. 0 89-5677 L COMPANY DOTE o-03-89 RNASN G.s.A.per, C-1 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS PAD RANG ENGINEERS • CONSTRUCTORS DATE zx-xx-89 LDGTIGN SW 16TH STREET, RENTON, WA_ Er.,,[ OM YpA ATV A W-11-N 40 20 0 40 80 3 m cn SCAL E:I•.4o'-0• THE AUST I N I SECT 1N4 SECTION t9-zrs HOLMES ELECTRIC I SEATTLE LUMBERCOMPANYIIcow. wN.I ¢ I 1 I I I < I I i I I 1---- I I I z rPROPOSED 24' 1 L_ IB•SS— I ACCESS DRIVE 18 55 i I 18•SS— - I SW 16T H STREET 1027.81' -N 89. 3s' zs• e IIOLYIPIC / 12•CI-ri 6 SoSEb I I-_-=Us--_---- CAS- EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT API P LINE US 12•CI-w— TIT I IC OLYIPIC _— - — 12•CI-I' PIPELINE PIPELINE a,/EXIST. PUOET POAER W - r—f0' EASEMENT EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT E%I IW 161T N 89. 35' 25• yam`@'ST ISIDEMALN202.87' 1 y— , I 5.0' -N 01. 22' 58• E I 412.89' -- EX 15T.POAER POLE I I/ CDC. CURSCIRB POAER EASEIEM UNDSGPI HG _--- 7'- L-AltiTKP1 K: aa\ r EXIST. 6 CONY A''. y I-9ttiti i- -i-I D• EASEIENTS • I >` 1 I I I I I I l l l l l l l l l l l l l I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I L ` I I SIDEWALK I IW , II1I1 _ _ N I I = 11o1 _.-..._ \ v32 W' _ a. — I= PUGET POWER g;i I Q O IDIUP 0 1 G - \a-1 1ISUBSTATIONI .I I I I II III Bu1LDIIG I I , I r - i _'Q ENTRANCE al CA 0 AI F I I i Li- - IP 2 - ci SIDEIRLK— V a ' F I IGROUP HEALTH I- N- zl " 1 .240.17• -N e9• is• xs• E i I OFFICE BUILDING I 2 n I LAID5UPI NC J L_ J I t{ aa}} c WIN ltVEl FIN. FLR. EL. 21.50 I U I I I I I III I I l l ( I 1111111 4°7R EWT o I i I I BOP I NG f0' EASEIE COMPUTER WATER ICIER I i I 6' •_ I//I I SERV I CES 3-EDLPOIID as ! IIIII E R I ' q 10' EASEMENT ?- _--- 4• P SS 8 1 a G Ir- JI111111III1IIIf1I111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111.m3: _=_ I N 6•FIRE HYDRANT I I— 6-X I-DOUBLE DETECTOR LOADINGDI I 1 105._ ,ED 11SII r-2 /TTAITFEB-1110111/M VE III 1IMW111' IIII TOEXIS .RE OVE STAN61RD ED 24' i 4 0 0 I 1 1 1 I H0 I PRO ED I24' MOVED ACCESS DRIVE .J , [I 11 I I I I I I I• AccET DRIVE fr1111111111111111111111111111111 1 111 1 1'11111111111111 1 ' 'i'DIIIIIIII ( III ( IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11I O 962.90' -N 88. 49' 01•II I IF 1 T EXIST. 1xll STUB Ii4. 0- AT PROPERTY LINE EXIST. 10' LANDSCAPING STRIP EXISTING 24• 0-NYEXIST. I EXISTING 24'II I ACCESS DRIVE 4 P—D4.10. ACCESS DRIVE VALLEY OFFICE •PARK i i I SITE PARKING I I EXISTING 24' ACCESS DRIVE TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED•853 i TOTAL PARKING REED•758 1 • FILL SIZE.497 HANDICAP.8 24 19 SECIMED•8 - 25 30 CCIPACT.340 IQ=o OM REVlnoN n O. WE aVlAla n o.). WLL1•.40-0 pn1 S I T E PLAN o.,a. 89-5477 a(l THE AUSTIN n GDD 5 COMPANY ly=E 03-30-89 ..c, G.S.A.worr C-2 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS O RAK ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS ,,n XX-XX-89 lcovla SW 16TH STREET, RENTON, WA. „5K 40 20 0 40 80 En inMB A SCALE:1•.407-0 THE AUST I N I WEST 1/4 COR. SECT ICN 19-23-5 I w COMPANY I I CONC. HOLMES ELECTRIC I > I SEATTLE LUMBER 1IIjiWii. / Z--J N 17.oa>I 1 SW 16TH STREET 1027.81' -N 89. 35' 25• E - i< t0- ) c2o.s8•f - zz.D- I czz.9> 16.98) 20.05) ( .03) ti'202.87' __ Li_ - N 89• JS' 25' r-10' E1 SELEHf CA fib' / r30'/PUGET PVAER T-- - 5.0' -N 01' 22' I 412.89' CCNC. CURB f0' EASEI£NTS r Y7\ap\9. ) 19.50 I L` - 19.37 19.0 I ' T/C 19.75/C6' CONE. SIDEWWLK I I L I17.40)i II1 W 119.50 -` 19.7 \ L14 III I i %+ XF e.o 1 I IIT/F 18.25 \II 61 I X/T 18.0 I I l III 19.SO G3rI17PUGETPOWER ' 71 /190 2 9 SUBSTATION C1 1 V'' a j I `\ I (9.50 I I19.50\:),,,) ffIB-27)1C79) I ti T i ,n 111111.BUILDING , f '.OD) l(18..: o (1 'I9.50 19.SO I T/F 18. ENTRANCE Z ,1 ' 1 F 6 12' CONC. s 11 I r_ _ I ` 19.50 (n CULVERT 1N NI I7I) ' 1. I N/. 14.0' 1 d a- I W GROUP ¢ sIx T/F 18.0HEALTHo o o r'- 76. t9.o LLg/ d\I OFFICE BlYiLDING J i. N19.2s B 179 BOEING 1--- 1 a.0 I T/F 18 19.25 Ng FIN. FLR. EL 21.50 I I COMPUTER a e'; / i N.i SERVICES Y 1 Nv. 2.3010EASE I: i.r •r ' 7 1` 1 I /Is_so I N19.5o I9.50 T/F 18.o , II. 19.50 0 0II. (19.50 i 19.50 /\19.50 N /I 19.50 19.50 1 1111a.36) ; 8 97) \ I I ,19.50 19.50 /!-- 1a 50 .\I 617 (17 e7) I __1e.2s lijtoi1a T i8.0 1a.50 rv1 1 r r I I L. e F i vF 18.0 r/F 1e.o r/F 1a.o r/F 1 .0 1 IT19.D I1 / T )8.01•.7s/'' 1/ B(sd=64--i5 ) 1\ I 1[1YY( 18.75. 18.50 1' 17. ) 17 80) 17.70)-- (17.70) 962.90' -N 89' 49' 0)"W 17.60) c 17.60> 1( 0> 7.801 I`I18.41) I EROSION CONTROL NOTES: VALLEY OFFICE PARK LEXIST, 10' LAIDSCAPING STRIP PROVIDE 15"NIGH CONC. CURB17. 7 ITOPOFPAVEMENTEL. (18.5)I I. ALL LIMITS a CLEARIIC AC AREAS 0 VEGETATION RBSERVATIO1 3. TIE ER05101 AIm SEDILCNTATIB CORM TESTER OFFIREO d S. II aw AREA Mld N•5 BEEN STRIPPED v OtEETAT1d MO YCRE TOP OF CURB EL. C 19.0)I I AS PRESCRIBED OR TIE RAM SAIL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN TIE 7N15 RR.INC ARE NTCwEO TO BE R11110 REQTI ACP4NT5 TO TER 1m RAPER.aRA IS ANTICIPATED FOP A PERIOD OP 30 ars DRrFIELDAICOBSERVEDDURINGCOSTR{R;11d.ANTICIPATED SITE C CIT 0N5.AS CONSTRICTION PROGRESSES A10 M.ALL OISILGRAS AREAS MST BE ER AFTCLY STABILIZEDIIKAPCETEDOREASOwLCDNOITDICTATE.1K PERIITTEE DRILL IM LLL CNI NG,GRASS PLANTING pR pfKR APMWCO EROSION I I. II CFSRVT IOILDPiDOR10LAELOARIIROAIOIw/DR FACILITIESEOISTRCTIa TILL BCARCCESv 0 IRSMIERECOIPPLRO ElSILTATia CdTRQ d`LiNC a` OGROL LSS SEEOENC OL RAPEIRILL ` TO PE TINE ACCLPTASE OILY DWIRNLNi 101116 I TO IT(SLRE TRIO SEOIREM LADEN YTER DOES PCT ENTER TK NATURAL PROPOSED SITE.DA110 DE CORSE CC COISTRLETIOI.IT SMALL CF APRIL TIROIp1 SEPTEL[1E2 1K.LSIVC.SEEDING wv PROCEED, I I DCLIM E 5 STER.ALL CRCSIa•O SEDI EC FACILITIES$WLL BE BE TIC CBI1aTld AND RESPONSIBILITY O NE P R Ii:EE TO OxVER,([V[q IT IS Ix 1K INTERESTa TIC RRYt 11EC. I I IINTAIKD IN A SATISFACTORY OTOITID 1MIL SLOT Tilt NV POTENTIALCLEARIICAND/CR COISTR ADDRESS AM MN CO,OIi INS TKO NAY BE CREATED BY AIS 011 LUST BE•1ADENTEO WITH Lua110.NETTING.OR OTKR I U_I ICR IS CONFUTED PO FOR ACTIN'',ITS AIR TO PROM OE ADDITIONAL FACILITIES,OVER AND IEATKNT APPROVED BY TIE CITY a RENTER.OOTSI CC TIE RROSId wS PASSED.TIC wLER:'ATId, IIOENAICE.RE ABOVE x NA.REOJIREL[Nf S,AS NAY BE NEEDED 10 PROTECTIDJACENTPROPERTIES SPECIFIED TINE PERIOD. I iREPLACEMENT•rO ADDITIONS TO CRp$IOVSEDI WNW Id COTIRQ MO RATER OIIALI iY OF TIC RECEIVING S. FOR ALL CROSIOYSCDI LENT•Tld CORRO.PODS WERE TK DEAD 1 [• MUDS SHALL BE THE RESP04519111TT O IREPERYI7TCC DR*IMAGE SISTER.STBAGE DON EXCEEDS 6-,A FENCE.A NT.IIAN OP 3 FEET MICA A. APPROVAL a'MIS RAN IS FM EROSIWSEOIRENTATIO.CORM IS REOIIREO.WITH 3:1 SIDE SLOPES.24 19 ONLY.IT DOES ROT COAT ITUTE AN APPROVAL a Slav C AINAGE DESIGN,SIZE Aw LOCAT C!PIPES,RESTRIttDRS,CM/NUS. T. •TELPERART GRAVEL COlTRICT 101 3111w•CAL 30'I SD I B-a A-TO 1-25 30 d RETENTION FACILITIES. 1'CII 55MARRY SPILLS SMALL BE 104TC0 AT ALL POINTS ER VENIGULARINGRESSAPOCCAS5TOTIECOSTRILTIdSITE. GPCS DATE EV15I. R 0.0 DATE 11Ev1510N R op, THE clo> 1TTIc GRADING PLAN D 89-5477 COMPANYAUSTIN MAT( 03-30-89 G.,4. G.S.A.WV C-3 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS P'0 RAK ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS 0314 xx-xx-89 1.9D44IP' SW 16T H STREET, RENT ON, WA. ,,,,. 40 20 s0 40 e0 3monmulmi im Am n S CA L E:1".40'-0• THE AUST I N I REST 1f4 CCR• W I I19-23-5COMPANYIIcow.10NiON. HOLMES ELECTRIC • I SEATTLE LUMBER I I w I z w I 1ISW16THSTREET1027.81' -N 89. 35 zs• E PROPOSED 7 6' SI DEIALK T rr-•.--rrw•.i L-' 1 .1 N 89' 35' 25" E C4 10' EASE1ENr n O•. 4••ti••._ ce._,O`O'O•• tea.._ ••• 4 c 4 - 1 •7 .:••.d:0•i4 .s••r rim q: : -.:`. ..... .. ; ., , . ..A.-..i•i•• +o••EXIST. CCfC. CURB • p4•t• r y1"y 10' EASE1fM5 4A• SI DEMAIK Cf£RRT YDCAIE • O DECOAR CEDAR A•••••,a• EXIST. 6' CONC. 7•TO 8' N 0`••'•, y a• j 6 r I. K At RHCOLOEma4 COTONEASTER 1 RO:KSPRAY TOE18" •••4•?4/ i!J O I TYPICAL) 4/•,b•=; • I 15IEOT000E1 O w I JAPANESE CROM I _ : PRCPOSED 6'SIDEMNLK N,WI • 0 , o O 2•CAL RRY SNC4ORCP IXNER JAPANESE a PIN OAK /yt••''f B , PUGET POWER ' x/. p 2O 6' H OHM SNOWDROP O 2•CAL 't'` ' w « .1 C-4c-s AO .1 F SUBSTATION Y oI P - OA c. HCO/ER R.O OAa OQ1 aj.BUILDINGiIRSICE WIN _taOt I d 0 j O ' 3clz1 .., •44 NILOLIFE DEWU MIR f l Y„Iz , •4 i>e PIN CAK ENIMNCELENT 8• i0 ICI'N is ko Om N• 4 / 2"CAL UNDSCAP AND O N c YCwErtPLANTERfig,1 GROUP >-ix n t4 ,r O AUTLw " LANDSCAPE a R110000EIOl(ON :0,,,,. Q HEALTH FLO.ERING 1M1 NV SHRUBS R IS" TO IS" of 4 OEOMR CEDAR 24. 17' =N 89. 35' 25. E O CHERRYGL Q p DEOMR CEDAR ` Z 7 To s xOGO .O'LO OO O%0110f.0//_Ol/AO r TO 6 N 0Ai J I i OFF ICE BUILDING 004 bt aia. au4 1111 FIN. FLR. EL. 21.50 I....*MANSE O;:4i COMPUTER is-To 24• /,S SERVICESa .( R/m00ENOliU1 J __IS•TO 18• O( AR16TRONG fi••4) I 4 +/ RED MPLE RIEO5ENDRCN DECDAR CEDAR ei O I0 IAPLE ®•44 r10• EASEIENr j 10' EASEIENI j ' Y CAL 15"TO 18' 7' TO 8' N 2"CAL •44x+y 10%O%O/is0'Oi2OV6000SLIMBI'OCIa0%O%CIICKW/.012,4"t o LAM(TTnJ I i 1 LA (TTn O so !1 os aoYl bn4 i — 0: O %kt:4 •1 GRQAO p1CROUW 2"CAL PERRY PIN OAK dso':p KYAN2AN DERRY CCVER T CAL NJER Y CAL 41 I p 2' CAl 1 -Ts 1:. SI III i4CAL 1 1 T. 1:• G 4`r 1:-RIODCCEPOREN S+moolattaN 5{`d gip • I PI RED IAPLE R)g000ENORRI OEDOAR CEDAR 15"TO Ir - I a I 4.._ 2" 15"TO 18"7' TO 8' N - - 1 - I • •aiiAoi oii uii ,. . Cr o• or ,. _ . V . r -r p' r ovi1.o oiiia•'''2• 14 962.'0' -N :•• 49' 0 )1 I - 3 GUYS 12C.APART VALLEY OFFICE PARK I I UEXIST. 10' LANDSCAPING STRIPITURIBUCXLE I I 2'X 2"X 24" I I STAKES t=..__1 I e 4 z 3'-Cr ) 4 1 I I I I Lax;2z 1 1-0• SITE LANDSCAPING LAX) J! x I TOPSOIL AND 16" NI N. 12' I VARIES 3' 1' _ TOTAL SITE AREA.383.330.00 SO FT 0'-0 6'-0" 1' 12 0" ,- VARIES I I I I I PEAT BACKFILL • s TOTAL REO'D LANDSCAPING.76,665.60 50 FT I I IICESALACTUALLASOSCAPINGAREA.78,104.60 SO FT I IAIET R PERIIETER LANDSCAPING AREA.55,621.35 SO FT 24 19 TYPICAL TREE PLANT I NG DETAIL SECT I ON n INTERIOR LANDSCAPING AREA.20,949.95 SO FT SECTION 25 30 SCALE: NONE SCALE: NOSE C_2 C-2 2S WILDLIFE ENIANCEIEM AREA-1533.3o SO FT SCALE: NOSE C-4 C-4 a THE AUSTIN s"`X I".4D-0• TITLE LANDSCAPING PLAN 69-Su71..1 WTE RYMER T C.m Ci1TE REVISION K. ORD 00 COMPANY wvc 03 3-89 0.c. G.S.A.men C-4 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS p•. RAK ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS Rvc XX-XX-89 LRATIryI SW 16TH STREET, RENTON, WA. iyyx SETTEEMENT PLATE NOTES:CA•ST PLe PIPER 40 20 0 40 ao / 1. INSTALLRRCRS IN FIRM GROUND OR a WO PADS IF NEEDED FOR STABILITY. ON PLATE. NOT FASTENED) 1W TARE INI71 L READING ON T0P OF KO AND AT ADJACENT CREAM LEVEL PRIOR N COUPLING.WELDED TO PLATE TO PLACEKHT OF APO FILL. SETTLEIENI PLATE SCALE:1••40'-0' THE AUST I N HOLMES O. FOR EASE IN WNOLIK.KO AND CASING ARE USUALLY INSTALLED IN 6-FOOT 16•% 16"X 1/4" SECT 1/4 CON. SCCTIENS.AS FILL PROGRESSES.COIPIIRS ARE USED TO INSTALL AWITIONL I SECTION 19-23-5 LOONS.CON7IUITY IS WINTAIK°BF READING THE TOP O TIE LLASIAECNO I LAI SAND PAD IF NECESSARY SEATTLE COMPANY CONc. IAl1. ELECTRIC Rao.TKNILAEDWTEtrAWINCTK SECTION APO EAOICTIE TOOTIE I Q I 5XIISTINGGROUND LUMBERADOEDRW.ROTN READINGS ARE MERCED. I I X. RECORD 1K ELEVATION I THE TOP 0A T NASUNL T KO IN IO f TIE AT I ITKCENTFILLSRFAEIK[Rvus-EAa TINE.NOTE TIE ELEVATION Of TIEADJACENTFluSURFACE. 4. PEAT TIE WRGCR TO TIC NEAREST 0.01 FOOT.ON 0.00S GNAT IF Pp551IL[.MOTE I W c TK FILL ELEVATION TO NEAREST 0.1 POT.Z SETTLEMENT PLATE DETAILJ / I - J LE: NONE of 77 ti9 20.58 f22.O6) 22.91 17.00)I ! SW 1 6TH STREET 1oz7.B,' -N 69• 35' 25' E _ iI _I/ 59) I6.OR1 1 2o.as7 (2D.o3) f t 10• E EXENT yti E _ 202.87' WIT N89• JS' 25 • 5'. i. ti•JO' GE POWER I- 5.0' -N O1. 22' 412.69' A \` ` CONC. CURB EASEMENT• 10' EASEMENTS v4z1 0% 6' CONC. SIDEWALK L.--' 1 117.40) 6.87. IOU 30'X ISO'X LSI 4" TO 6' (-)STRIPI NG LIYI iS E 1 OWRRf SPACES I TEIPORARY SCALE(TYP) poi\ i II 1 I a 3 ) aI6WI= PUGET POWER ' z1 TOE SLOPE 1 1 n I n a I w aI. SUB$TAT I ON I SLOPE z:1 INK. 1R.a+1ea9) h T- N na.00l ne.6sSETTLEIEMPLATE ZIQi (`1\ 7/ a 5[E DETAIL) 3a1 ry I I Z ,1 Y 6, J a 1j•EONG. T) 4 I N 112'L'ttP OVT CULVERT IN law. 'co. TA J4 I W GROUP I c B a HEALTH I I CI 111111 I_ a9) 4 ,A 1 SLOPE 0.50% IIB.68) l 261 (191 il- YIN. ( ) no•3 17.93 BOE I NGII jx j 1 E e x 101 EA EVENT COMPUTE R i'' f' g7 I ToP of RGEFiLi 10TYP 1 INV. I .3D SERVICESEL.H EASEEIENT III C Z4.s III 1 m SILT CONTROL F 6 II ALL SIDES OF EX1517 9' 95'-0' , 8.36)81977 TYPICALTCH BASINPLACES) N. SLOPE 2:1 W%. I IB 60) (I7.:7) I TOE Of SL 4" X I6" %) fi8 I OUATORRY6SPALLS 250 1\111---1) ioi17.9(.4-\ I\ 17.641\ 17.701 9 97I 1-- ` I7.20) -- - \(17.so •17.701-- (17.70V 962.90' -N 89• 49' 01"C 17.601 17.60) --CI7.701 V17.80) '1II aB.4n VALLEY OFFICE PARKIEROSIONCONTROLNOTES: 4x4 PTAL T o.c.wx.I FILTER FABRIC C- 5. IN Aw AREA INIa Ws eEEx sTRIPKD O vEmATION AND WEREORIETALSTAI(ES 1. AS LIMITS O GEARING ARO AREAS 6 KLEIATION PRESEWTIC 3. TN CROSION ANo SCDINENTATION tONIRO'SYSEEN OEPIRED OND P001KR LORR IS ANTICIPATED FOR A RRIW DF]0 OAK RFASLDEANDREDONTKRANSW1IK 101. fIAOLEO IN TK AN S IFATEO ATE IONOITI TO AS YINIUN REOII PCKKS TS TER LORE.ALL D15TLgRCD AREAS MST K IYEDIATCLT STABILIZEDDETCHFLOCFIELDANDMOWEDWRINGCONSTRIcrION. ANTICI PATEO SITE 508*IL 06.AS C06TRLCf. T PROGRESSES AK MIN LAACNI NG,GADS RAKING OR OTHER APP40070 EROSIONWIREISSNFENCEANTIPCETEOORSEASONALCONDITIONSDICTATE,iK RRNITTEE CILIIj'-0 I I LIRE 2. ALL REWIRED SEDJNEKKIOVEROSRON CONTROL FACILITIES UST IE ANTICIPATE TWO LORE EROSION AND SEOILEKATION CONTRO.FACILITIES CONTROL(0147 ALOEAPPLICABLE TO THE TILE OF YEAR IN OES71ON.4- i SILT IN OPEWTION POOR TO LAND CLEARING AND/OR KKR COO -IRK WILL RE NECESSARY 11 IT6LNE COOLIE SILTATIOI MIKE W 1K GRASS SEEDING WILL RE ACCEPTABLE CRY BRING iK CO.FLOE TYPO 4(-) ROCK TO IR6URE TOT SMACK LAKE LATER DOES PO ENTER 7K NATURAL PROPOSED SITE.OAlrO TIC COURSE OF N6TRUCTION.IT SMALL LOONS OF APRII THROWN SET/TENTER INYAUSRVE.SEEDING WY PROCEED. DITCH FLOC LINE DRAINAGE 5751(4.All EROSION AND SEDI LENT FACILITIES SWII(E BE TIC OBLIGATION ANp RESRA6IRIII7Y O DC PERYi TTEE TO IDaVER,WIDENER IT IS Ix TK INTEREST OF TIE PNELRTTEE. DIRECTION I I SILT FENCE WIKAI1O IN A SATISFACTCRV 00611101 LNIII SLCN TINE TINT DORE55 AK POT 00017106 iTNAi WY K CREATED BF MI5 RUT W57 IC AUOEKCD NUN 01011NG.K7TI10.OR OIKR L.,-TOP OF DITCH CLEARING AINOT C06TRLC7ION IS CORETED AND POTENTIAL EON ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FACILITIES.OTER AN)TREAIKK APPROVED K DE CITY OF RCNTON,OUTSIDE iK A7 • I I I ON-SITE EROSION WS PASSED.7K IIPLCaNTATION, IKCNANCC. ABM NINIWN RCWIREIEKS.AS NO H NEEDED 70 PROTECT SPECIFIED TIT[PERT(D. REPWCENENT,ATD ADDI71O6 70 EROSTOWSCDIKKATION COITRG ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND INTER OIMIITF C!iK RE[CIVIIO '6. Fdt ALL CRa51 ON/SCOINENTATION CaTR0.FOES SERE TIE DYADSKTCL6SMALLf[IK RCSPO6IRILITT(r TIE KiN11TT[C. DRAINAGE MIEN. STORAGE OEPIN EICCEDS 6•,A EDR.A Anwar O 3 FELT MI01 A. APRWAL Cf THIS PLAN IS FOR EROSIOVSEDINEKATION COOKS IS REWIRCD.NIT"3.1 SIDE SLOGS. 24 19 SECTION n TYP. SILT FENCE PLAN ONLY.IT DOES NO7 CONSTITUTE AN APPRG'AL aF STORE OWING( 7. A TELVO AP0 GRAVEL tOSTRTETION ENTRANCE,I Do:r a A TO 6 25 30 SCALE:NONE • C-5 C-5 SCALE:NONE OR RETENTION FACILITIES. ION.TIFF FOR LITIES. a Plxs.RESTRIC106.ONMELs.1KJ1°WRAY PALLS DOLL RE LOCATED AT ALL POINTS Cr VENRCILARORINGRESSAIDEGRESSTOTIECOR614101101SITE. Nora LATE av13T4R m are DOE av111a n owe THE AUSTIN f `cAOu°• ),TEE SITE PREP. & EROSiON CONTROL PLAN N.D.q, 89-5477 COMPANY PATE 03-30-89 awe* G•S•A• p€ET C-5 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS CRC RANT ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS TRUE X%-%X-89 LPwRIOI SW 16TH STREET. RENTON. WA. IISVE I G 1 I 4 1 5 I 2 •3 T .- g 9 I To Of PARA R Y w_ ' 14 I. t t iSAI.f oR 1 1 iQ[L 14-4, I^ 1 1 1 y A 1 L a a1IiL11CI L•1:7'!''11+ 1 1 I i A 1 1 a 1 + i 1 i . a 1 11 I ! I 1 1 1., 1III I_ L. __ Lit, 6' 13 1 1 1 1 A I a' I 1 1 I 1 . i i J. 1 T 1 1 I1---ill A - 1 II ffl I 1 1 I I I I i I I ! I I. I I fll I I I aev.flora I II•'1 I .1 I 1 1. 1 .1 i 1 J. I IA . I 1 I - t 1 1 1 I i 'ZQI A OSOUNO FLOOR 4 IL.10.4..r r D O BUILDING SECTION 5 A L! Ye 21,0' DAT. 1r...40 41, enm an 24 Q THE AUSTIN SCA.BUILDING SECTION as-salt COMPANY0.411t o.,•• oT A- CONSULTANTS ANCNITSCTO C4111. lNOI CONSTRUC.ross wn toc..n.rn A C D F G H A E - TOP of MRA[T I IL.177'.YL. iIt I I 1 T I B STH.fLroR I I I I ' 1 1 I I II ftm E. f f :i l I u L 1 I! 44TILR. 7.4. R I-I «- 1 T 4. ;h,. I P... If[ II 1 3RD.ft 7R I I» I I, I 1 I 4. , it f a1. 1.1D FIR. I• I 1 ALLIOIO:o• n A .. J D I I O BUILDING SECTION s4.LI • • Y•.Ito' T mar. D.,. o. OWED an 011.101.1 T CORD T... D a THE AUSTIN BUILDING SECTIONSN 994477 COMPANY D..® A-15 CCNSULTANTIO ARCHITECTS CYO, Nol oNSTRUCTowe D•. L«•^a 1OD. T J O •O • ® T . ® V 1) 1- I I I I I I I l T P . s NIII II II 11 I I I II IIIIIIIIIII I sT-•..F- -31 I: 1 I I . I ' I I I lJ LI I_ I I I I ,TM I ill i Illll II 111 III Il III it I II it 1 HI I III I IIII1 I I 111 • I1 1 1 1 1 rrrvs r_4_ I filll ! 11111111 11 , parr _ 1 [ 1 I 11 I 1 Ii I 1 111 1111 ll , „ 0.n, 1 ii IIII I I II J II I I l l l l ) I l l'I I I z s 1 II I I I I I I I 1 I I I 11 11 T zN,1 r - 1 I I I ! 1 l ! l I .'1r ; ills .- Et . I 1:A 7 t< L V A T I o t-.l - 1.--1 o tz 7 H . L Y A T I o IJ cd.Lc .. I/Id . 1` - o,GALE- s I/i . It. au 0 0 © © C) 0 -.,..--...- 9 . c) 1) . 7 0: • , c) 1 1)-- • ri i_ ___ _,_ c: 9 s I T 1 p C To_V•I I I I I t 1 i111 illl ! I ; I 1 ( I __IJIII ' • I ' IIiIIiII 3 IIl1 I111 -Illi 1 Ili : I II : I11 1,1IIIIIIIIIlI11 I Lit_ s F+f•— III111 III III111 III - 111111 ; IIIIIIIIII I I [ I • II I I I 1 1 1 I Il I ;' ' 11111111 I . S, J f*Y,<-rr.Ill II mil III i ! 11i1. • 1 ' Ili1 ' " IIIliliill a III III l ( II" I ! IIIII ! , ! f1 ' lll !. II ' I111111 ) ( IIe.v(tar.P . r- D.9 r.... . P- IIIIIIIILI III ( HI II : I ! IIIIIi 1 111 Ii ! i I HI hill Illi Y•I I 11 II Ills IIII IIsds..rr. Z IIII w nt.rr. , 11.110.M.. 11.1111 T a I IiC` W tr 5 - . . L. V A T I O IJ ___ O-U.T C_... V A.T I.o f l .GALC I/10 • I' - O° gGdLC . I/i/l . 1' - 0.1 I I . I tons DAIS • .m.41 IVY COm an 00. EV a THE AUSTIN VAl IONS COMPANY RNr CONSULTANTS ARCNIT[CTC 'w^ NO, CONSTRUCTORS 0fl LOCATION a. n THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. RENTON, WA 98055 COMPACOMPANY PHONE: 2 8800NY71TELECOPIER: 206/228-5471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223-01 AU-ST-IC-T377N3 July 28, 1989 0 ory JU/oN l 1989 Ms. Lenora Blauman 444r Senior Planner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Reference: GSA/FAA Office Building ECF: SA-030-89 Austin W.O. Number 89-5477D Dear Ms. Blauman: Per your request of July 27, 1989, to provide additional information for your preparation of your staff report to the hearings examiner, I have provided the following: Building Description" The building structure will be steel-framed, Type II-FR, founded on auger-cast piling and reinforced concrete foundation. The exterior wall will be comprised of aluminum curtain wall with 1" insulated PPG Solorex tinted vision glazing and 1/4" Spandrelite of grey-lite ceramic frit. Glazing sections will provide a modified thermal break. A dry-vit" stucco system will be incorporated at the ground floor and to form architectural design elements at each elevation of the building. Courtyard" The courtyard will be enclosed on the south and west by reinforced concrete walls of 6-8 foot height. Decorative concrete pavers will be utilized as the paving material. The courtyard will provide a fountain, and benches for seating. A landscape plan and photograph of the courtyard is included for your use. Elevation" Changes to the elevations include additional storefront glazing and entry on the west side:viewing the courtyard. The covered parking area has been relocated per our rsubmittal of June 5, 1989. Included are copies of the current elevations and ground floor':plan. for, your use. Ms. Lenora Blauman City of Renton Page 2 July 28, 1989 Please advise me if you require additional information or have any questions. Very truly yo s, t44.4" Robert G. Sny er Project Coordinator RGS/ddl CITY OF RENTON WL i 1} w' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division July 25, 1989 Robert G. Snyder The Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 Re: GSA/FAA Office Building 1601 Lind Avenue SW ECF; SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Snyder: A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has beenscheduledforAugust8, 1989. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in theCouncilChambersonthesecondfloorofCityHall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the publichearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If youhaveanyquestions, please call 235-2550. Sincerely, C)V4th)t Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator . DKE:mjp 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - of1G1 y t c-1 c cn AcA (RAJ 51067 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristie Ferguson being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six RE,TON HEARING EXAMINER months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published RENTON, WASHINGTON Y in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER ATAT County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for CIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND OFTON, ASH- King County. NGTOON, ON CITY AUGUST 8, HALL, 1199, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING The notice in the exact form attached,waspublished in the Kent Edition PETITION: GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING Renton Edition X X , Auburn Edition and not in ECF; SA-030-89 supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199,000 square foot (177,000 during the below stated period.The annexed notice a square feet leaseable space)office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in an Office Park Notice of Public Hearing R3639 OP)zone. The property is located on Lind July23 19 89 Avenue and S.W. 16th Street. was published on Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PRE- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the PETITIONS ARE INVITEDUBLI EATO INBEgggSENTATTHEPUBLICHEARING ON sum of $ 2 3.2 8 AUGUST 8, 1989, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Publ,,hed in the Valley Daily News July28, 1989. R3639 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2nd day ofAugust 19 g9 Not Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER ATHISREGULARMEETINGINTHECOUNCILCHAMBERSONTHESECONDFLOOROFCITYHALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON AUGUST 8, 1989, AT 9:00 A.M.TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-030-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199, 000squarefoot (177, 000 square feet of leasable space) officebuildingonan8.8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. ThepropertyislocatedonLindAvenueandS.W. 16th Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in theRentonCommunityDevelopmentDepartment. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BEPRESENTATTHEPUBLICHEARINGONAUGUST8, 1989, AT 9:00 A.M. TOEXPRESSTHEIROPINIONS. Published: July 28, 1989 OF RE+ e', N0U6QZkir% mao i 01- 146.0ErA o4'Eb SEPTE OP City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ON AUGUST R, igRq BEGINNING AT 9_00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING:GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING THE AUSTIN COMPANY APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A FIVE STORY/199,000SQ.FT. (177,000 SQ. FT. OF LEASABLE SPACE) OFFICE BUILDING ON AN8.8 ACRE PARCEL IN AN OFFICE PARK (OP) ZONE. C.;;;JH L--'-:--'' ''..:---------• ------ LI rrr r.,.rr,r 0 (--__ rE22- anon.cc.a.rna+ „nwn.n.... g_c_m__ -----_-4.____,_,____ .:----J--7--- ---7.: . n I t • 1 alit fir• in„,,,,.L t 1 . 1 ----;LI/7- r ---\ Ns-, s :._:-. „ iil II L 14 ta, X. GENERAL LOCA ION AN • /0 - ADD - SS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON LIND AVENUE ANDIS.W. 16TH STREET. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUTPROPERAUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION i k t Li kip HEREBY CERTIFY THAT RF. IA COPIES OFABOVEDOCUMENTWEREPOSTEDBYMEInICESONORNEARBYTHEDESCRIBEDPROPERTYpRsECONSPICUOUS3 ) laL+ Iq.is ATTEST: Subscribed end sworn to before me, eRotaryPublic, -In end for the State of Washington. h residing In day of on theses SIGN E U VvypL`/ a: . CF R 4, 7 ,i SEP °INi.If City of Renton Land Use Hearing .E.xaminer ; will hold a in‘:!,,,,..•;,,,,;,,,:.: i L,,.,:-,.,.. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY . HALL'; ON AUGUST 8, 19R9 BEGINNING AT 93:00 A.M. : P.M. CONCERNING: GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING ' THE AUSTIN COMPANY APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A FIVE STORY/199, 000 SQ.FT. (177, 000 SQ. FT. OF LEASABLE SPACE) OFFICE BUILDING ON AN •8 . 8 ACRE •PARCEL IN AN OFFICE PARK (OP) ZONE. 1:::--:—.::::::7-7--- I 1 1 ...1-0-F • IYI\[O CC.[t1 tllC[MC IM[MI\I[..01 77-7-11.---- Et ----- --- mi r-------LET---iir"..-N 4,1---iL ci.i L " —__IL 'E-ii,-:-..-- • --____. 4,, ----___ Li1L.:__:.:.ilic IL, j_____-1 [7.- wow 7-7-- ju •In',„ • .i I A LI/ -2,,,T,E . 1ari" I "18;1" 1 ,... s...., I : 0 0 N\I I i auceuollKff Il I titUT O.,ICI P = i-• C11 i cr. GENERAL LOCATION AN 0 /0 ADD SS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON LIND AVENUE AND S.W. 16TH STREET. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL. THE CITY OF ' RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT' 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE . REMOVED . WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 1at? NO a ICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COM IITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- jects under the authority of the Renton AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Municipal Code. The following Applicants have completed a mitigation process: GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING (ECF; SA- Audrey Benner being first duly sworn on oath states 030-89) Applicant seeks site plan approval;or a live that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the story/199,000 square foot (177,000 squarefeetofleasablespace)office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in OfficeAveParkl VALLEY DAILY NEWS I zone.. The property is located of Lind A nue and S.W. 16th Street.Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CHECK- POINT (ECF-041-89) I Applicant seeks to consolidate several now-Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers i functioning hazardous materials receiving are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six i areas by relocating all materials to a single months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published checkpoint in an existing building. The i checkpoint will be composed of two adja-in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King cent sections including: a)an indoor facility County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal I of 1800 square feet, and b) an outside newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for facility of 1600 square feet.The property is Kinglocated at the corner of S.W. 43rd Street County. and Lind Ave. S.W. KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING The notice in the exact form attached, was ublished in the Kent Edition ECF;89) p Applicantnt seeks site plan approval for the Renton Edition it Auburn Edition and not in construction of a 2,700 square foot office supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers building on an approximately .267 acreapproxi- duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice a section of 4a property Thatwhich26 acrels ionmately .544 acres. .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is Public Notice zoned B-1 and is currently developed with a small (approximately 600 square foot) July 3, 1999 R5 26 4 office building. The western section of the was published on property(approximately .277 acre)is zonedR-1; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time.The proper- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the ty is located at 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E.sum of$ 44_22 Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination 1 is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on July 17, 1989. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Subscribed and sworn before me this 19th day of July 19 89 Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing,why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published July 3, 1989 Valley Daily News R5264 Lary Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicants have completed a mitigation process: GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-030-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199,000 square foot (177,000 square feet of leasable space) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. The property is located on Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CHECKPOINT ECF-041-89 Applicant seeks to consolidate several now-functioning hazardous materials receiving areas by relocating all materials to a single checkpoint in an existing building. The checkpoint will be composed of two adjacent sections including: a) an indoor facility of 1800 square feet, and b) an outside facility of 1600 square feet. The property is located at the corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Ave. S.W. KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-045-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2,700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately 544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1 and is currently developed with a small (approximately 600 square foot) office building. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. The property is located at 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E. Further information regarding this action is available in- the Community Development. Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on July 17, 1989. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non- refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published: July 3, 1989 J CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division June 30, 1989 Robert G. Snyder The Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 Re: GSA/FAA Office Building 1601 Lind Avenue SW ECF; SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Snyder: This letter is to inform you ,that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above referenced project. Comments were received. The issues raised by the respondents have been noted and will be considered by Staff in their reports. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 17, 1989. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora_Blauman of our office at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, in jtV Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 a BTA7 f Q NNON CURT SNITCH j• Director oLIT'r Ui 1.:...` . . 'I y'(IBfl9 ay u J U N 2 8 1989 STATE OF WASHINGTON I, j s 1 DEPARTMENT OF ,WILDLIFE t!; 16 8 M4 I tired--E3lvd., Mill Creek, WA 98012 Tel. (206) 775-1311 June 27, 1989 Environmental Review Committee Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: SA-030-89; GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING; MDNS Dear Sirs: The Department of Wildlife concurs with the determination for this proposal. We support the mitigation proposed for stormwater retention/detention and biofiltration. These measures are necessary to maintain good water quality for fish and wildlife downstream in the P-1 channel and the Green River. Sincerely, 7 O Tony Oppermann Habitat Biologist TO:kh c: Habitat, Olympia I 6 mETRD Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building 821 Second Ave, • Seattle, WA 98104-1598 June 27, 1989 Environmental Review Committee c/o Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-SignificanceFileNo, ; 30-89 illA.E10. Company Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates nosignificantimpactstoitswastewaterfacilities. Public Transportation The project proponent has contacted Metro and work has begun ontherequiredTransportationManagementPlan (TMP) . Metro commends the City of Renton for requiring a TMP as aconditionofapproval . Metro staff working with the AustinCompanyincludeDougJohnson, Facilities Planning (684-1597) ,Jack Latteman, Service Planning (684-1647) , Ann Ward, CommuterServicesRepresentative (684-1561) and Carol Thompson, MarketDevelopment (684-1610) . Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, X-L a(/J ti Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg4824 mETRD Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598WI I Li g June 27, 1989 i ;l'' J U N 2 9 1989 IIrrr1viE1-1 Environmental Review Committee c/o Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-SignificanceFileNo. : ECF-30-89 Austin Company Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates nosignificantimpactstoitswastewaterfacilities. Public Transportation The project proponent has contacted Metro and work has begun ontherequiredTransportationManagementPlan (TMP) . Metro commends the City of Renton for requiring a TMP as aconditionofapproval. Metro staff working with the AustinCompanyincludeDougJohnson, Facilities Planning (684-1597) ,Jack Latteman, Service Planning (684-1647) , Ann Ward, CommuterServicesRepresentative (684-1561) and Carol Thompson, MarketDevelopment (684-1610) . Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, 7,,,,,,,, Z- 6( ,,,Z____ dGregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg4824 TIE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. COMPANYmay) RENTON. WA 98055 COMPAN 1 PHONE: 206/226-8800 TELECOPIER: 206/228-5471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223-01 AU-ST-IC-T377N3 June 23, 1989 GUY OF RENTON Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP 171 Environmental Review Committee ILO 'JUN 2 .7 1989 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South 0 `i L Renton, Washington 98055 Reference: GSA/FAA Office Building ECF: SA-030-89 Austin W.O. Number 89-5477D Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is in response to our conversation this date, requesting clarification of specific conditions set forth by the Environmental Review Committee's Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated. As discussed with you this date, the following conditions require additional clarification: Item 3 That the applicant be required to provide a plan for traffic management, subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division, including, but not limited to: a. Assessment for Burlington Industrial Park Benefit Zone. $560,465 Transportation Benefit Zone Assessment fee. 2,845 trips generated at $197. Referencing Lenora Blauman's letter of May 18, 1989, the TAC comment concerning the assessment of trips generated was determined to be 2,730 at 197. In our response to the May 18, 1989, comments we stated "We agree to provide mitigation assessment in accordance with City's policy. The calculated amount should be based on the 199,000 gross SF of the building which generates 2,300 trips (per ITE, 4th Edition, 1987). The assessment should also reflect the $9.00 HOV reduction per trip generated as allowed for implementing a transportation management program per City policy." Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 23, 1989 Page 2 We request that you clarify the following: 1) Is our assessment correct? 2) What formulation and method was used to obtain the 2,845 trips now indicated? 3) If an acceptable transportation management plan is implemented, will the trip generation assessment fee for each trip generated be reduced by 9.00 to $188.00 per trip generated? 4) If the HOV reduction requires separate application, when and in what form would the application be made? 5) Are there other requirements necessary to qualify for the HOV reduction? Item 3 c. Developer to work with Metro to provide a TSM plan which includes: 1) information about, organization of, and preferential treatment for vanpools and carpools; 2) information about and incentives for use of public transit systems; 3) a bus shelter on the west side of Lind Ave.SW nearest to the site. This plan is to be approved by the City's Planning Division and Traffic Engineering Division. A committee comprised of representatives of The Austin Company, GSA, FAA and Metro has been organized to develop a Transportation Management Plan TMP) for this project. 1) When should this plan be submitted to the Planning Division for approval? Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 23, 1989 Page 3 Item 3 f. Provide for street lighting on S.W 16th St. Plans to be coordinated with City proposed street improvements on S.W. 16th St. Submit drawings for approval. Item 4 That the applicant install sidewalks, curbs and gutter, lighting and landscaping along S.W. 16th Street from the western property boundary to Lind Avenue South (including the property which traverses the Puget Power Substation) and from the corner of S.W. 16th Street south along Lind Ave to the southern boundary line. (The proponent may prefer to participate in a LID., which would serve to provide financial benefit at some future point for the installation of those and related improvements.) Item 5 That the applicant provide a) on site bicycle parking facilities; b) a five foot wide bicycle lane (including gutters) on S.W. 16th Street in order to facilitate recreational and commuting cyclist. If we elect to participate in the future L.I.D., all off-site street improvements on S.W. 16th Street would be built under the L.I.D. As per our discussion, you stated a bond would be required to be posted equivalent to 150% of the construction cost. Please clarify: 1) When and with whom would this bond be posted? 2) What is the projected start date for S.W. 16th Improvements? 3) What is the anticipated completion date for these improvements? 4) Are there any plans for a future L.I.D. to widen Lind Ave. S.W. to 5 lanes from S.W. 16th Street to the widening at the Vyzis project? Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 23, 1989 Page 4 Item 6 b.3. A containment program for ensuring that materials now (or in the future) stored on the site are not allowed to contaminate the underlying terrain in the event offlooding, in order to protect the wetland areas in the vicinity of the site. Please reference our response of June 5, 1989. The minimum elevation on this site will be approximately 18', 2' above the 100 year flood plain and the building elevation is at 21'-6", 5'-6" above the 100 year flood plain. The outside storage area has been omitted from the project and the FAA has not given any indication of a need to store any hazardous materials within the building. Please clarify if a plan is still necessary and if so what a containment plan should include and how it should be implemented. We appreciate your expedient response to the above mentioned items. If there are any questions or additional information needed please contact me. Si rely, Robert . er Project Co-ordinator NOT ICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-030-89, SA-030-89 APPLICANT AUSTIN COMPANY GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A FIVE—STORY/199,000 SQ.FT. (177,000 SQ.FT. OF LEASABLE SPACE) OFFICE BUILDING ON AN 8.8 ACRE PARCEL IN AN OFFICE PARK (OP) ZONE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LIND AVENUE AND S.W. 16TH STREET POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL s WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M.,JULY 17, 1989 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OFIEABOVEDOCUMENTWEREPOSTEDBYMEIN CONSPICUOUSACESONORNEARBYTHEDESCRIBEDPROPERTYON ATTEST: Subscribed nod e'orn to before me, eNotaryPublic -In sod for the State of Washingtonresldlnn day of on the g SIGNED : e- zPJ ,Sty__)2Z, '_Z N OT C E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-030-89, SA-030-89 APPLICANT AUSTIN COMPANY GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A FIVE-STORY/199, 000 SQ.FT. (177, 000 SQ.FT. OF LEASABLE SPACE) OFFICE BUILDING ON AN 8. 8 ACRE PARCEL IN AN OFFICE PARK (OP) ZONE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR: ADDRESS LIND AVENUE AND S.W. 16TH STREET POSTED TO NOTIFY. INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., JULY 17 , 1989 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. 1 \ N oT c E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-030-89, SA-030-89 APPLICANT AUSTIN COMPANY GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A FIVE-STORY/199 , 000 SQ.FT. (177 , 000 SQ.FT. OF LEASABLE SPACE) OFFICE BUILDING ON AN 8 . 8 ACRE PARCEL IN AN OFFICE PARK (OP) ZONE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LIND AVENUE AND S.W. 16TH STREET POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., JULY 17 , 1989 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. METRO— Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 a, lii rf 01 6-i6..116'19 June 27, 1989 1Y JUN 2 9 1989 ll IP, C ri Vt Environmental Review Committee c/o Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No. : ECF-30-89 Austin Company Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities. Public Transportation The project proponent has contacted Metro and work has begun ontherequiredTransportationManagementPlan (TMP) . Metro commends the City of Renton for requiring a TMP as a condition of approval. Metro staff working with the Austin Company include Doug Johnson, Facilities Planning (684-1597) , Jack Latteman, Service Planning (684-1647) , Ann Ward, CommuterServicesRepresentative (684-1561) and Carol Thompson, MarketDevelopment (684-1610) . Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gib 2L 2) dif1-1'Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg4824 mETR0 Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 June 27, 1989 CiWi LA lii. N 01 :JUN 2 9 1989 Environmental Review Committee c/o Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No. : ECF-039-89 Renton Public Works Department Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities or publictransportationservices. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, g/L,,L Gam., gr./Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg4825 bo CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division July 5, 1989 Roger O. Bair U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 17900 Pacific Highway South C-68966 Seattle, Washington 98168 RE: Austin Building (GSA/FAA), S.W. 16th Street at Lind Avenue, (030-89) Dear Mr. Bair: I am writing in response to your letter of June 2, 1989, concerning parking plans for the above- referenced project. As you are aware, City of Renton regulations limit parking spaces which may be provided in conjunction with the proposed office development, to a maximum of 853 stalls. Similarly, those regulations allow a maximum of 50% of the required parking spaces to be placed in reserve -- either to address proponent concerns or to address municipal development policies/objectives. City staff and Metro staff have expressed considerable concern about off-site traffic impacts - which are anticipated to occur with the addition of 853 parking spaces which you request (or with the 843 spaces proposed by Austin in a revised site plan submitted on June 5, 1989). Providing that number of spaces will ensure a minimum of 853/843 vehicles travelling to and from the site, and, will, concomitantly, discourage participation in Transportation System Management Plan programs (use of van pools, car pools, public transit, etc.). Additionally, the introduction of 853/843 cars on to adjacent roadways is likely to cause considerable impact on levels of service on those rights-of-way. Similarly, there is a concern related to on-site impacts likely to occur in conjunction with the placement of 853parking spaces on the property. For example, this number of spaces would limit permeable area so severely as to prevent adequate storm drainage management. On-site landscaping and recreation amenities could not be accommodated with the provision of 853 parking spaces; these amenities and storm drainage management is better achieved with 843 spaces -- but this number still too severely impacts traffic management off of the site. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington, 98055 - (206)235-2550 Roger O. Bair r' July 5, 1989 Page 2 While staff did initially recommend the immediate allowance of 677 spaces and the placement of 146 spaces in reserve, a review of your letter and information provided by Austin, led to a revision in that recommendation. The Environmental Review Committee., following review of these materials and staff comments, agreed on June 9, 1989 to allow the placement of 770 spaces on the site, with 83 additional spaces depicted/placed in reserve. The Environmental Review Committee was of the opinion that this number of spaces would adequately address parking needs for a minimum of 70% of staff (735), while reserving 35 spaces for field vehicles -- which will, by definition, be out in the community for the majority of the day --, and for visitors -- who will be likely to be arriving and leaving throughout the business day. In order to accommodate persons who will be using personal vehicles for official business, staff suggest that you assign those individuals specific spaces to assure parking as necessary. These spaces, together with off-site mitigation measures (e.g. a deceleration lane, channelization) and on-site mitigation measures (e.g. preferential parking for van pools and car pools, subsidized bus passes) are viewed to be sufficient to serve the proposed development. The Environmental Review Committee's Determination of Non-Significance issued on June 9th did note that a portion or all of the reserved parking may be implemented after a period of one year of operation of an approved Traffic Management Plan if the Zoning Administrator determines that there is an apparent need for additional on-site employee parking. We appreciate your concern for providing for traffic management in order to ensure that the proposed office complex is an attractive, functional development. If you have questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me or Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner who is project manager for this project, at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/LB:mjp n Jr 1 0!;! U.S. Department Northwest Mountain Region 17900 Pacific Highway South of Transportation Colorado,Idaho,Montana, C-68966 Federal Aviation Oregon,Utah,Washington, Seattle,Washington 98168 Wyoming Administration Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP f'T) JUN 5 1989 ' Environmental Review Committee r. City of Renton 11 r 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: It has come to my attention that the City of Renton's Technical Advisory Committee has requested a revised site plan from our contractor, The Austin Company, reflecting 677 parking spaces at the new General Services Administration (GSA)/Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Office Building, 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. Renton. This is of major concern to me for several reasons, which I will detail below. When we began this search process for a new building over three and one- half years ago, our estimate for the number of people who would occupy the building stood at 800. Since that time, several aviation safety and security issues have occurred, causing significant increases in our personnel who deal with such matters. By the time we actually move next year, we expect 1,050 personnel to occupy the building at any one time. Our original requirement for parking spaces was 965. This included parking for our employees, 25 visitor spots, and parking space for 40 U.S. Government cars, which are used only during the day and not for commuting purposes. Given our staffing expansion, we will add 10-20 more Government cars for a total at move in of 50-60. An additional 25 visitor spaces will be needed, bringing that total to 50 spaces. Because several of our offices are currently on or adjacent to an airport, many of our customers fly in and walk directly to those offices. Since the new location is beyond walking distance from the Renton Airport, our former "fly-in" customers will drive to our new consolidated office, thus the need for additional visitor spaces. . We appreciate the City of Renton's desire to manage traffic, but the 677 parking spaces being contemplated would have an adverse effect on our operations. A considerable number of personnel in this new building will be field office personnel with responsibility for inspection and surveillance of airline/airport/aircraft design, manufacture, operations, and security. Much of their work is n„tai.,the office envirnnmgat at the various airports. Often times the Government cars we provide for official business are already being used, so we then authorize use of personal vehicles for completion of assigned duties. Obviously, our staff must have assured parking available at their office site in order to perform those duties. l'r 2 When the solicitation process to award a contractor was still in progress, personnel from GSA met with City staff to explain the needs of the FAA, including parking, and to assure this site would be able to meet those needs before awarding a contract. At that meeting in March 1988 the staff member consulted did not give any indication that parking for 800 plus cars would be a problem. On that basis the contract was awarded for this site. Based on Code, 853 spaces would be able to placed on this site. Although this was about 12% below our needs at the time, we felt we could accommodate this reduction by public transportation, car pools, and van pools. Of course now our staffing expansion has made these methods even more critical. Therefore, we have been actively pursuing these avenues. For example, just last month we asked Metro to make a presentation on van pools. Over 60 people attended, which was double our highest expectation, and eight 15-person van pools were assembled. The Austin Co. has been actively pursuing additional bus routes with Metro, including a bus stop adjacent to the building. We have also been working with other agencies learning how to develop and set up a preferential car pool/ride sharing program with preferential parking being one of the main incentives. Mr. Erickson, 677 parking spaces is a reduction of 288 spaces or 30% below our originally stated need of 965. Adding in our staff growth, we would conceivably be able to provide only a little. less than two-thirds of our working population on-site parking by the time we move in, if we are held to 677 spaces. We recognize the City's concerns about traffic and good traffic management and applaud those efforts, since we too will be affected by it. We are showing our support by the initiatives we are already taking in providing alternate means of transportation other than single car-single driver". But the major point is we need all 853 spaces, code will allow. I hope this letter helps you better understand our needs. If I can provide you or your staff any further information on this matter, please contact me on 431-2862. d. Roo 0. Bair Project Manager, Seattle Offices Consolidation cc: Fred Waters, GSA I I, 70 CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY.DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division July 5, 1989 Mr. Robert Snyder The.Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, Wa 98055 RE: GSA/FAA Office Building S.W. 16th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. ECF; SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Snyder: Thank you for your letter of June 23, 1989. Mr. Erickson has asked me to respond to it on his behalf. 1) Traffic Management a. Item 3a The Environmental Review Committee established a trip end generation estimate based upon ITE, 4th Edition, 1987 calculations for a building of 100,000 gross square feet rather than a building of approximately 200,000 gross square feet, because the density level of occupancy (1,050 employees) for the proposed structure is more similar to that expected for a 100,000 gross square foot structure than that expected for a 200,000 square foot structure. On that basis, an assessment was made that 2,845 daily trip ends would be generated. The proposed $197.00 per trip generation fee will be reduced by $9.00 to $188.00 per trip generated, when information is received documenting that the goals established in the Transportation Management Plan have been achieved to the satisfaction of the City. A separate application for HOV reduction is required; this can be accomplished through submittal of a letter describing development/assessment plans to the Environmental Review Committee. Any HOV reduction program would need to be approved by METRO. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Mr. Robert Snyder GSA/FAA Office Buuang July 5, 1989 Page 2 b. Item 3c The proposed Transportation Management Plan (TMP) for the above-referenced project should be submitted to the Planning Division for approval at the earliest possible date. The granting of a Certificate of Occupancy (temporary or permanent) for this project is dependent upon City approval of the TMP. c. Items 3f; 4; 5 If you elect to defer off-site improvements until those can be accomplished under an L.I.D. you will then be required to post a bond equivalent to 150% of the cost for construction of those improvements. Further information concerning the posting of the bond, the scope and the nature of the L.I.D., and other improvement activities under consideration may be obtained from the Traffic Engineering Division. d. Item 6.b.3 In the event that the selected site and the proposed structure are determined by the Storm Water Drainage Engineering Staff and the Fire Prevention Bureau to be elevated sufficiently above the flood plain to protect the underlying terrain from damage in the event of flooding, spillage or other incident, the City may waive the requirement for a containment plan. The decision as to whether a containment plan is necessary is based upon likely adverse impacts to the environment resulting from storage-related accidents over the life of the project -- the absence of hazardous materials at this time does not preclude future storage of such materials; protection against future activities must be addressed at the time of initial construction of the development. If a containment plan is required, it should be designed, constructed and operated to specifications established by the Storm Water Drainage Engineer, and the Fire Prevention Bureau, and is subject to approval, also, by the Planning Division and the Building Division. Whether or not a containment plan is necessary, the applicant will be required to provide an agreement, as specified in the Environmental Determination of Non-Significance (Mitigated), to hold the City harmless in the event that damage occurs to the property or to any structure/contents on the site. If you have additional questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Lenora B. Blauman Senior Planner LB/mjp JTH E AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. RENTON. WA 98055 CMPANY PHONE: 206/226-8600 TELECOPIER: 206/228-5471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223-01 AU-ST•IC-T377N3 June 23, 1989 CPOFRENTON Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP i % 'JUN 2 .7 1989EnvironmentalReviewCommitteeI` City of Renton L;-I) E '200 Mill Avenue South L, Renton, Washington 98055 Reference: GSA/FAA Office Building ECF: SA-030-89 Austin W.O. Number 89-5477D Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is in response to our conversation this date, requesting clarification of specific conditions set forth by the Environmental Review Committee's Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated. As discussed with you this date, the following conditions require additional clarification: Item 3 That the applicant be required to provide a plan for traffic management, subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division, including, but not limited to: a. Assessment for Burlington Industrial Park Benefit Zone. $560,465 Transportation Benefit Zone Assessment fee. 2,845 trips generated at $197. Referencing Lenora Blauman's letter of May 18, 1989, the TAC .comment concerning the assessment of trips generated was determined to be 2,730 at 197. In our response to the May 18, 1989, comments we stated "We agree to provide mitigation assessment in accordance with City's policy. The calculated amount should be based on the 199,000 gross'SF of the building which generates 2,300 trips (per ITE, 4th Edition, 1987). The assessment should also reflect the $9.00 HOV reduction per trip generated as allowed for im lementing a transportation management program per City policy." 1 u V re/ Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 23, 1989 Page 2 We request that you clarify the following: 1) Is our assessment correct? 2) What formulation and method was used to obtain the 2,845 trips now indicated? 3) If an acceptable transportation management pla is implemente will the . trip generation assessment fee for each trip grate e uced y i9.00 to $188.00 per trip generated?a' e wee,r'' 4) If the HOV reduction requires separate ap icationaw ri% d, form would the application be made? 5) Are there other requirem9sip necessary to qualify for the OV reduction? A- , `Xtaa 0-Ad 144,-e d Ae;* - RA pp, , Item 3 c. Developer to work with Metro to provide a TSM plan which includes: 1) information about, organization of, and preferential treatment for vanpools and carpools; 2) information about and incentives for use of public transit systems; 3) a bus shelter on the west side of Lind Ave.SW nearest to the site. This plan is to be approved by the City's Planning Division and Traffic Engineering Division. A committee comprised of representatives of The Austin Company, GSA, FAA and Metro has been organized to develop a Transportation Management Plan TMP) for this project. 1 1) When should this plan be submitted to the Planning Division for approval? k ‘740/1. ---d-fird----)-(44 4 VA" 1 1 al Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 23, 1989 Page 3 Item 3 f. Provide for street lighting on S.W 16th St. Plans to be coordinated with City proposed street improvements on S.W. 16th St. Submit drawings for approval. Item 4 That the applicant install sidewalks, curbs and gutter, lighting and landscaping along S.W. 16th Street from the western property boundary to Lind Avenue South (including the property which traverses the Puget Power Substation) and from the corner of S.W. 16th Street south along 0' Q, k Lind Ave to the southern boundary line. (The proponent may prefer to participate in a LID., which would serve to provide financial benefit atLID.,, some future point for the installation of those and related improvements.) Ite 5 That the applicant provide a) on site bicycle parking facilities; b) a five foot wide bicycle lane (including gutters) on S.W. 16th Street in order to facilitate recreational and commuting cyclist. If we ele . to participate in the future L.I.D., all off-site street improvements on S.W. 16 • Street would be built under the L.I.D. As per our discussion, you stated a b• d would be required to be posted equivalent to 150% of the construction cost. Please clarify: 1) When and with whom would this bond be posted? 2) What is the projected start date for S.W. 16th Improvem tits? 3) What is the anticipated completion date for these improvements? 21 4) Are there any plans for a future L.I.D. to widen Lind Ave. S.W. to 5 lanes from S.W. 16th Street to the widening at the Vyzis project? Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 23, .1989 Page 4 Item 6 b.3. A containment program for ensuring that materials now (or in the future) stored on the site are not allowed to contaminate the underlying terrain in the event offlooding, in order to protect the wetland areas in the vicinity of the site. Please reference our response of.June 5, 1989. The minimum elevation on this site will be approximately 18', 2' above the 100 year flood plain and the building elevation is at 21'-6", 5'-6" above the 100 year flood plain. The r outside storage area has been omitted from the project and the FAA has not given any indication of a need to store any hazardous materials within the building. Please clarify if a plan is still necessary and if so what a containment plan should include and how it should be implemented. We appreciate your expedient response to the above mentioned items. If there are any questions or additional information needed please contact me. Si rely, Robert . er Project Co-ordinator i 1 r THE AUSTiN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. RENTON, WA 98055 COMPANY PHONE: 206/226-8800 TELECOPIER: 206/228-5471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223-01 AU-ST•IC•T377N3 June 5, 1989 Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: GSA/FAA Office Building ECF-SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Erickson: This is in response to the City's letter of May 18,1989 and clarification letter of May 30, 1989. We appreciate Lenora Blauman and Jerry Lind taking time to meet with us so that we could better understand the City's concerns in requesting the proposed mitigating conditions. As a result, we have significantly modified our site and landscaping design for the project and are providing the following revised and/or additional information for your staff's review: A. A revised Site Plan which increases and relocates landscaping areas; creates a landscaped courtyard with benches and a fountain; adds a landscaped terrace waiting and gathering area; reduces parking; provides walking trails and pedestrian access routes to building from site perimeter and parking areas; establishes a commuter "stop drop" zone, deceleration lane, 2-way left turn lane, and a bus shelter location; and indicates the site lighting design which achieves 1.5 footcandles (min.) lighting level throughout. B. A revised Landscaping Design scheme which increases plant material maturity, quantity and diversity and raises the total area of pervious landscaped surfaces. The resultant landscaping design effectively mitigates the visual impact of the parking areas and project massing on the surrounding community as well as the individual occupant. In addition, the treatment of the perimeter landscaping works well with the existing East Valley Office Center landscaping to provide cohesive visual design statement at Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 2 the northern entrance to the valley on Lind Avenue at its intersection with 16th. An artist's renderings of the courtyard and terrace designs are provided for your reference as well as a project site model. Also provided are: 1. A complete tabulation of the landscaped area calculations which substantiates our compliance with the zoning ordinance requirements for landscaping percentages. 2. Storm drainage system basis of design,preliminary drawings and calculations which substantiate compliance with 25 year storm peak flow capacity as well as City Ordinances for water quality protection and storm drainage. In addition the design provides for supplemental pollution filtration utilizing surface plant materials. 3. A letter from the Federal Aviation Administration (building tenant) substantiating their commitment to mass transit programs, van pools and car pooling for more than 25% of their staff commuting needs and validating the necessity for the parking quantities proposed. 4. Site grading plan which substantiates building floor elevation 5.5' above current FEMA 100 year flood plain and all parking surfaces located at or above the City recommended elevation of 18', (2' above 100 year flood). 5. Letter from Puget Power indicating the impact their substation has on this project. 6. Letter from Metro regarding their participation in and desires for a bus shelter on the west side of Lind Avenue adjacent to this project. We wish to address each of the requested conditions outlined in your correspondence in light of the revisions described above, and where we are unable to respond precisely as requested, explain how we believe we have addressed the City's concerns. Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 3 Item 1 a) Reduce initial parking to 677 spaces with 146 spaces held in reserve (Renton code 4- 2208(12)). b) Plan for on-site recreation areas (picnicking, congregating, walking trails) c) Provide on-site exterior lighting at pedestrian scale. d) Provide pedestrian pathways to link building with parking, recreation areas and adjacent right-of-ways. We understand this request was motivated by three concerns. First is the goal of creating a more "campus-like" setting with "user-friendly" amenities on the site. Second is the desire to ensure that the plans comply with city policy concerning storm drainage runoff, and has as much pervious surface as is necessary to do that. Third is an effort to ensure that the goals of the VTIP study of achieving a 20 percent reduction in single-occupancy commuter vehicles are reached within new development. Our revised site plan design, attached, reduces our parking layout to 843 parking spaces (61% standard & 39% compact), which we believe responds to the first concern in several important ways. First, it substantially increases the quantity, maturity and variety of the street-frontage landscaping which affords significant softening of the project visual impact on the surrounding community. It also provides a visual relief from the intense street scene for the on-site occupant. Second, the redesign concentrates significant amounts of landscaped areas and materials to create a large landscaped courtyard west of the building and a garden terrace along the eastern side of the facility. Both areas provide pedestrian scaled areas with bench seating amenities to stimulate user congregating, picnicking, and comfortable areas to relax and wait for rides, etc. The courtyard area which utilizes grasscrete permeable surfacing also has a fountain and is located near the employee cafeteria area. Third, the landscaping within the parking areas has been increased in maturity, quantity and variety and utilizes a series of pedestrian pathways linking the parking areas, recreation areas and adjacent perimeter right-of-ways with the Ba Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 4 facility as well as providing walking trails for recreation. These pathways are illuminated with pedestrian scale bollards to afford excellent security and safety when combined with the parking area lighting system which provides a 1.5 to 4 footcandles of lighting throughout the site. We have included a complete area tabulation of landscaping on the site which substantiates that the design exceeds the requirement of Renton Code 4-718(5) in terms of area of landscaping provided. We feel the artist's renderings of the site amenity areas and the scale model of the site help to communicate the campus-like, inviting atmosphere which we have strived to create in the redesign of the project. With respect to the second concern for storm water management, we have submitted our storm water system basis for design which includes computer based modeling of the system as well as preliminary design drawings for the system, all of which demonstrate that the storm drainage system planned complies fully with the city's adopted storm drainage policies. In addition we have provided plant material/ground cover at 460 parking stalls in the 2' overhang area between the wheelstop and the landscaping area. This material, while not utilized in satisfying required landscape area, does reduce the amount of impervious surfacing by more than 8,000 square feet (over 2% of the total site area). Regarding the third concern to reduce single-occupancy vehicle commuter cars, we believe that policy will be fully achieved with the 843 parking stalls which our plan proposes. Indeed, we cannot comply with the requirement of Section 4-2208(12) that before parking can be held in reserve the applicant must provide data which substantiates a reduced need because the facts simply do not support it. The provided letter from the FAA substantiates that at move-in, the FAA expects to have 1050 employees working in the building at one time. If 20 percent of these come by other than single-occupancy vehicles, there would be a need for 840 stalls for commuters. In addition, the FAA will have from 40 to 50 government vehicles which cannot be used for commuting and which must be parked on site. It also needs approximately 50 visitor parking spaces. That means that of the 843 parking spaces, as few as 743 will be available to commuters. This means that the FAA will substantially exceed the city's goal of 20 percent reduction in single-occupancy vehicles. The FAA expects to achieve this through a combination of van pools, preferential parking for car pools, and encouraging Metro ridership which will also be supported by the commuter information center being provided as a part of the project in the building lobby. Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 5 Item 2 Revise landscaping to address aesthetic impacts, light and glare impacts, and to accommodate storm drainage management. Beyond the substantial improvements mentioned in the response to Item 1 above significant landscaping increases have been accomplished in the revised plan. The perimeter landscaping along Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street mirror the design we provided in Phase II of the East Valley Office Center project across Lind Avenue. The dominant feature will be a colonnade of 4-inch caliper oaks, which in conjunction with the oaks on the neighboring site create a boulevard appearance to S.W. 16th Street and Lind Avenue as the entrance to the to the valley office park zone. In addition to our own site landscaping, we are currently working to obtain' Puget Powers permission to continue the landscaping scheme across the perimeter of their site as shown on the design drawings. In a similar manner we have approached the owners of the Valley Office Park located south of the project to obtain permission to provide them with the upgraded landscaping along the common property line boundary as shown on the drawings. All these efforts will significantly reduce the impacts of the site light and glare, as well as further extend the benefits of the landscaping concept initiated by Austin at the East Valley Office Center and continued here in this project. As mentioned in the response to Item 1 the revised design fully meets the city's storm drainage management policy and exceeds the required landscaping area standards. Item 3 Provide a plan for traffic management. We agree to provide traffic mitigation assessment in accordance with city policy. The calculated amount should be based on the 199,000 gross square footage of the building which generates 2350 trips (per ITE, 4th edition, 1987). The Assessment Fee should reflect the $9.00 reduction allowed for alternative commuter program initiation outlined in the letter from the FAA. We are in contact with Metro and will provide a commuter information center in the building lobby and structural pad for a Metro bus shelter if they so desire. Refer to the enclosed letter from Metro. In addition, preferential parking will be assigned for multi-occupant vehicles and van pool use. All driveways will be 30' wide at the street curb as shown on revised site plan. The revised site plan drawings provide for; relocation of Lind Avenue street light, street lighting on SW 16th Street, a right turn deceleration lane at Lind Avenue driveway approach channelization of a center two-way left turn lane at Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 6 Lind Avenue driveway entrance and a vehicle turn-out for drop-off of passengers on SW 16th Street. We have been advised by Puget Power that all power distribution conductors below 55KV along SW 16th Street are currently underground and no further overhead is planned. We are currently in contact with the Owner's of the Valley Office Park facility discussing possible configurations for a shared driveway entrance at Lind Avenue. To date there has not been any agreement by them to a particular solution for submittal to the City of Renton. Item 4 Substation environmental concerns; a) type and quantity of power generated b) U.S. Department of Energy information indicating safe distances c) site plan revisions if necessary The U.S. Department of Energy, in their publication "Electrical and Biological Defects of Transmission Lines: A Review", indicates that based on 20 years of research, the bulk of scientific evidence indicates that typical exposure by the BPA transmission lines (500 KV & 765 KV) poses no health hazards. This is further documented by the Electric Power Research Institute's studies on "EMF and Human Health". We have obtained copies of these studies (approx. 100 pages) and will make them available to you if you desire. Puget Power has advised us the Earlington Substation produces 1,15 KV power. The proposed building is approximately 200' from the over lines entering the substation. The courtyard outdoor recreational area is approximately 130' from the same lines. Based on the above referenced materials, this location would receive less than 1 milligauss of EMF, or less than the exposure measured in any typical residence. It is the opinion of The Austin Company and Puget Power that the Earlington Substation poses no dangers to the health and welfare of the occupants of the proposed project due to EMF exposure. No design revisions have been made for this subject. Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 7 Item 5 Construction Plan addressing; erosion control, wheel-washing, periodic watering of site for dust control, hauling routes and hours which mitigate traffic impacts, and bond of $3,000 for street clean-up. A Site Preparation and Erosion Control Plan showing wheel wash areas was submitted on May 16, 1989. The balance of Construction Plan meeting all City requirements will be submitted to the city for approvals as soon as definition of specific parameters affecting the plan can be ascertained, and prior to commencement of work. Watering trucks and street clean-up will be provided as required depending on work intensity, weather, City requirements, etc. Site Plan/Building Plan Review Issues 1. Storm Drainage Management 2.a Siting for 100 year flood 2.b Future 100 year flood potential 2.c Hazardous material containment for flooding We have included herein our preliminary design for storm drainage system, which includes a basis for design, computer modeling calculations for the system and preliminary design drawings. All of this information substantiates our compliance with the city's adopted storm drainage policies. Final design information will be submitted at the time of building plan review submittal. To date, we have been unable to secure a copy of the 5/4/89 Memo from Storm Water Utility Engineering referenced in the May 18, 1989 letter or a response to our letter to Lynn Guttman May 11, 1989, requesting clarification of requirements and policy. The building floor elevation has been established at 21.5' which is 5.5' above the FEMA 100 year flood plain (16'). All parking surfaces and roadways are a minimum elevation of 18' in accordance with city recommendation and 2' above 100 year flood. We are pursuing the hold harmless agreement requested regarding flood damage. We are pursuing the FAA regarding current or future plans (if any) to store hazardous materials on the site, and upon receipt of definitive information regarding possible hazardous materials, a containment plan will be formulated and submitted to the City for approval. Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 8 In summation, The Austin Company is committed to compliance with the policies and regulations of the City of Renton with the goal of creating a Regional Headquarters facility for the Federal Aviation Administration which enhances the quality of life of the general community and building tenant alike. We feel this project is of the highest quality and truly an asset to the City of Renton both economically and aesthetically and look forward to working in conjunction with you and your staff to accomplish these goals. If we can be of any assistance, please don't hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, Warren C. Pugh, AIA Manager of Facilities Development enclosures: 1ti/ U.S. Department Northwest Mountain Region 17900 Pacific Highway South of Transportation Colorado,Idaho,Montana, C-68966 Oregon,Utah,Washington, Seattle,Washington 98168 Federal Aviation Wyoming Administration CN F SS J U N 2 1989 CJTY OF REN ON Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP 0 , JUN 5 1989 '` ', Environmental Review Committee 1 City of Renton P i,: 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: It has come to my attention that the City of Renton's Technical Advisory Committee has requested a revised site plan from our contractor, The Austin Company, reflecting 677 parking spaces at the new General Services Administration (GSA)/Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Office Building, 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. Renton. This is of major concern to me for several reasons, which I will detail below. When we began this search process for a new building over three and one- half years ago, our estimate for the number of people who would occupy the building stood at 800. Since that time, several aviation safety and security issues have occurred, causing significant increases in our personnel who deal with such matters. By the time we actually move next year, we expect 1,050 personnel to occupy the building at any one time. Our original requirement for parking spaces was 965. This included parking for our employees, 25 visitor spots, and parking space for 40 U.S. Government cars, which are used only during the day and not for commuting purposes. , Given our staffing expansion, we will add 10-20 more Government cars for a total at move in of 50-60. An additional 25 visitor spaces will be needed, bringing that total to 50 spaces. Because several of our offices are currently on or adjacent to an airport, many of our customers fly in and walk directly to those offices. Since the new location is beyond walking distance from the Renton Airport, our former "fly-in" customers will drive to our new consolidated office, thus the need for additional visitor spaces. We appreciate the City of Renton's desire to manage traffic, but the 677 parking spaces being contemplated would have an adverse effect on our operations. A considerable number of personnel in this new building will be field office personnel with responsibility for inspection and surveillance of airline/airport/aircraft design, manufacture, operations, and security. Much of their work is ni,Fc ide the office eirnnmez at the various airports. Often times the Government cars we provide for official business are already being used, so we then authorize use of personal vehicles for completion of assigned duties. Obviously, our staff must have assured parking available at their office site in order to perform those duties. When the solicitation process to award a contractor was still in progress, personnel from GSA met with City staff to explain the needs of the FAA, including parking, and to assure this site would be able to meet those needs before awarding a contract. At that meeting in March 1988 the staff member consulted did not give any indication that parking for 800 plus cars would be a problem. On that basis the contract was awarded for this site. Based on Code, 853 spaces would be able to placed on this site. Although this was about 12% below our needs at the time, we felt we could accommodate this reduction by public transportation, car pools, and van pools. Of course now our staffing expansion has made these methods even more critical. Therefore, we have been actively pursuing these avenues. For example, just last month we asked Metro to make a presentation on van pools. Over 60 people attended, which was double our highest expectation, and eight 15-person van pools were assembled. The Austin Co. has been actively pursuing additional bus routes with Metro, including a bus stop adjacent to the building. We have also been working with other agencies learning how to develop and set up a preferential car pool/ride sharing program with preferential parking being one of the main incentives. Mr. Erickson, 677 parking spaces is a reduction of 288 spaces or 30% below our originally stated need of 965. Adding in our staff growth, we would conceivably be able to provide only a little less than two-thirds of our working population on-site parking by the time we move in, if we are held to 677 spaces. We recognize the City's concerns about traffic and good traffic management and applaud those efforts, since we too will be affected by it. We are showing our support by the initiatives we are already taking in providing alternate means of transportation other than single car-single driver". But the major point is we need all 853 spaces, code will allow. I hope this letter helps you better understand our needs. If I can provide you or your staff any further information on this matter, please contact me on 431-2862. Root 0. Bair Project Manager, Seattle Offices Consolidation cc: Fred Waters, GSA NW s 3 CITY OF RENTON pY err COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division July 5, 1989 Warren C. Pugh, AIA Manager of Facilities Development The Austin Company 800 Southwest 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 RE: GSA/FAA Building, S.W. 16th Street and Lind Avenue SA 030-89 Dear Mr. Pugh: I am writing to respond to your letter of June 5, 1989, concerning the above-referenced project. To begin, we are in receipt of revised site plans, landscaping design scheme and related documents, storm drainage system preliminary plans and site grading plans, which you indicate have been provided to us. Similarly, we have received the referenced letter from the Federal Aviation Administration. The referenced letters from Puget Power (#5) and letter from METRO (#6) were not included in the materials package. It would be desirable to have those materials included in the project file so that they can be evaluated in conjunction with environmental/site plan review for this project. Item 1 a) Reduce initial parking to 677 spaces with 146 spaces held in reserve. b) Plan for on-site recreation areas. c) Provide on-site exterior lighting. d) Provide pedestrian pathways. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington .98055 - (206)235-2550 Iis Warren C. Pugh, AIA GSA/FAA Office Building July 5, 1989 Page 2 The revised site plan which you submitted on June 5, 1989, depicting on-site recreation areas, on-site exterior lighting and pedestrian pathways does generally address City recommendations for improvements in those areas. Some improvements in the lighting plan are required by the Environmental Review Committee see Determination of Non-Significance issued June 9, 1989). in order to improve the scale and level of illumination on-site. The plan which you submitted for parking -- a reduction of 853 spaces to 843, rather than the 677 recommended by the City -- is not deemed appropriate by staff. Staff believe that the 770 spaces required by the Environmental Review Committee in the Determination of Non- Significance issued on June 9, 1989, is sufficient (in combination with a Transportation Systems Management Plan) to serve the estimated 1050 employees, as well as. the anticipated number of official cars and visitor cars on the property at any one time during the course of the day. Staff note that the 50 official cars are likely to be in the field for the duration of the business day, and that the estimated 50 visitors are expected to arrive on campus over the course of the business day. The recommended 770 spaces translates into more than 90% of the allowable 853 spaces; the City is authorized to allow placement of up to 50% of the allowable spaces in reserve. The placement of parking in reserve and the use of that reserved area for additional landscaping and/or recreational space will serve to further improve the ambient level of this proposed development. Item 2 Revise landscaping to address aesthetic impacts, light and glare impacts. As noted in discussion under Item 1, the proposed revised landscaping plan submitted on June 5, 1989 is approved in principle by staff. This plan will be evaluated in detail at the time of site plan review. Efforts to coordinate on-site landscaping with landscaping in place on neighboring properties and to extend improvements along the Puget Power are commended. Item 3 Provide a plan for traffic management City staff, using ITE reports for a 199,000 square foot building, together with information from Austin indicating the presence of 1050 employees and 50 visitors on site each day, has calculated 2845 ADWVTE, and has based traffic mitigation plans -- including fees, parking plans, and a Transportation System Management Plan -- on that information. Upon confirmation that an approved TSM is in place, an appropriate fee reduction will be implemented. Plans for location of driveways (as well as efforts to obtain a joint driveway with the owners of Valley Office Park facility), relocation of street lighting, addition of street lighting, a right turn deceleration lane, channelization, vehicle turn-out and related improvements have been approved in concept by the City. Item 4 Substation Environmental Concerns Based upon information that the Puget Power Substation generates 115 kV and that no increase is anticipated, the proposed location of the courtyard and structure is acceptable. Warren C. Pugh, AIA GSA/FAA Office Building July 5, 1989 Page 3 Staff note, however, that Austin statements that the document "Electrical and Biological Defects of Transmission Line: A Review" by the U.S. Department of Energy reports -- that 500 kV and 765 kV transmission lines pose no health hazards -- are not correct. The reader is referred back to that document for their own edification/clarification. Item 5 Construction Plan The proponent's proposed schedule for developing construction and erosion mitigation plans is acceptable to staff. Site Plan/Building Plan Review Issues 1.Storm Drainage Management 2.a Siting for 100 year flood 2.b Future 100 year flood potential 2.c Hazardous material containment for flooding The suggested plans submitted by the proponent, combined with Environmental Review Committee recommendations are anticipated to be satisfactory to address storm drainage management and flood control. Hazardous material containment plans will need to address, .but not be limited to, current and future FAA storage plans. Containment systems must be sufficient to protect against contamination to adjacent wetlands and ecosystems by any product which is allowed by Code to be stored or used in the Office Park zone. We hope that the above-provided information serves to clarify City policies and regulations as applicable to your proposed project. We look forward to working with you so that your development is attractive and functional one, which serves both Austin and the City of Renton well. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me or Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner who is project manager for this project, at 235-2550. ely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/lb:mjp I THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. rgaCOMPANYV RENTON. WA 98055 COM PAN 1 PHONE: 206/226-8800 TELECOPIER: 206/22B-5471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223-01 AU•ST•IC-T377N3 June 5, 1989 Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: GSA/FAA Office Building ECF-SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Erickson: This is in response to the City's letter of May 18,1989 and clarification letter of May 30, 1989. We appreciate Lenora Blauman and Jerry Lind taking time to meet with us so that we could better understand the City's concerns in requesting the proposed mitigating conditions. As a result, we_have significantly modified our site and landscaping design for the project and are providing the following revised and/or additional information for your staff's review: A. A revised'Site Plan which increases and relocates landscaping areas; creates a landscaped courtyard with benches and a fountain; adds a landscaped terrace waiting and gathering area; reduces parking; provides walking trails and pedestrian access routes to building from site. perimeter and parking areas; establishes a commuter "stop drop" zone, deceleration lane, 2-way left turn lane, and a bus shelter location; and indicates the site lighting design which achieves 1.5 footcandles (min.) lighting level throughout. B. A revised Landscaping Design scheme which increases plant material maturity, quantity and diversity and raises the total area of pervious landscaped surfaces. The resultant landscaping design effectively mitigates the visual impact of the parking areas and project massing on the surrounding community as well as the individual occupant. In addition, the treatment of the perimeter landscaping • works well with the existing East Valley Office Center landscaping to provide cohesive visual design statement at Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 2 the northern entrance to the valley on Lind Avenue at its intersection with 16th. An artist's renderings of the courtyard and terrace designs are provided for your reference as well as a project site model. Also provided are: 1. A complete tabulation of the landscaped area calculations which substantiates our compliance with the zoning ordinance requirements for landscaping percentages. 2. Storm drainage system basis of design,preliminary drawings and calculations which substantiate compliance with 25 year storm peak flow capacity as well as City Ordinances for water quality protection and storm drainage. In addition the design provides for supplemental pollution filtration utilizing surface plant materials. 3. A letter from the Federal Aviation Administration (building tenant) substantiating their commitment to mass transit programs, van pools and car pooling for more than 25% of their staff commuting needs and validating the necessity for the parking quantities proposed. 4. Site grading plan which substantiates building floor elevation 5.5' above current FEMA 100 year flood plain and all parking surfaces located at or above the City recommended elevation of 18', (2' above 100 year flood). ' 5. Letter from Puget Power indicating the impact their substation has on this project. 6. Letter from Metro regarding their participation in and desires for a bus shelter on the west side of Lind Avenue adjacent to this project. We wish to address each of the requested conditions outlined in your correspondence in light of the revisions described above, and where we are unable to respond precisely as requested, explain how we believe we have addressed the City's concerns. Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 3 Item 1 a) Reduce initial parking to 677 spaces with 146 spaces held in reserve (Renton code 4- 2208(12)). b) Plan for on-site recreation areas (picnicking, congregating, walking trails) c) Provide on-site exterior lighting at pedestrian scale. d) Provide pedestrian pathways to link building with parking, recreation areas and adjacent right-of-ways. We understand this request was motivated by three concerns. First is the goal of creating a more "campus-like" setting with "user-friendly" amenities onthesite. Second is the desire to ensure that the plans comply with city policy concerning storm drainage runoff,and has as much pervious surface as is necessary to do that. Third is an effort to ensure that the goals of the VTIP study of achieving a 20 percent reduction in single-occupancy commuter vehicles are reached within new development. Our revised site plan design, attached, reduces our parking layout to 843 parking spaces (61% standard & 39% compact), which we believe responds to the first concern in several important ways. First, it substantially increases the quantity, maturity and variety of the street-frontage landscaping which affords significant softening of the project visual impact on the surrounding community.It also provides a visual relief from the intense street scene for the on-site occupant. Second, the redesign concentrates significant amounts of landscaped areas and materials to create a large landscaped courtyard west of the building andagardenterracealongtheeasternsideofthefacility. Both areas provide pedestrian scaled areas with bench seating amenities to stimulate user congregating, picnicking, and comfortable areas to relax and wait for rides, etc. The courtyard area which utilizes grasscrete permeable surfacing also has afountainandislocatedneartheemployeecafeteriaarea. Third, the landscaping within the parking areas has been increased in maturity, quantity and variety and utilizes a series of pedestrian pathways linking theparkingareas, recreation areas and adjacent perimeter right-of-ways with the w Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 4 facility as well as providing walking trails for recreation. These pathways are illuminated with pedestrian scale bollards to afford excellent security and safety when combined with the parking area lighting system which provides a 1.5 to 4 footcandles of lighting throughout the site. We have included a complete area tabulation of landscaping on the site which substantiates that the design exceeds the requirement of Renton Code 4-718(5) in terms of area of landscaping provided. We feel the artist's renderings of the site amenity areas and the scale model of the site help to communicate the campus-like, inviting atmosphere which we have strived to create in the redesign of the project. With respect to the second concern for storm water management, we have submitted our storm water system basis for design which includes computer based modeling of the system as well as preliminary design drawings for the system, all of-which demonstrate that the storm drainage system planned complies fully with the city's adopted storm drainage policies. In addition we have provided plant material/ground cover at 460 parking stalls in the 2' overhang area between the wheelstop and the landscaping area. This material, while not utilized in satisfying required landscape area, does reduce the amount of impervious surfacing by more than 8,000 square feet (over 2% of the total site area). Regarding the third concern to reduce single-occupancy vehicle commuter cars, we believe that policy will be fully achieved with the 843 parking stalls which our plan proposes. Indeed, we cannot comply with the requirement of Section 4-2208(12) that before parking can be held in reserve the applicant must provide data which substantiates a reduced need because the facts simply do not support it. The provided letter from the FAA substantiates that at move-in, the FAA expects to have 1050 employees working in the building at one time. If 20 percent of these come by other than single-occupancy vehicles, there would be a need for 840 stalls for commuters. In addition, the FAA will have from 40 to 50 government vehicles which cannot be used for commuting and which must be parked on site. It also needs approximately 50 visitor parking spaces. That means that of the 843 parking spaces, as few as 743 will be available to commuters. This means that the FAA will substantially exceed the city's goal of 20 percent reduction in single-occupancy vehicles. The FAA expects to achieve this through a combination of van pools, preferential parking for car pools, and encouraging Metro ridership which will also be supported by the commuter information center being provided as a part of the project in the building lobby. Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 5 Item 2 Revise landscaping to address aesthetic impacts, light and glare impacts, and to accommodate storm drainage management. Beyond the substantial improvements mentioned in the response to Item 1 above significant landscaping increases have been accomplished in the revised plan. The perimeter landscaping along Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street mirror the design we provided in Phase II of the East Valley Office Center project across Lind Avenue. The dominant feature will be a colonnade of 4-inch caliper oaks, which in conjunction with the oaks on the neighboring site create a boulevard appearance to S.W. 16th Street and Lind Avenue as the entrance to the to the valley office park zone. . In addition to our own site landscaping, we are currently working to obtain Puget Powers permission to continue the landscaping scheme across the perimeter of their site as shown on the design drawings. In a similar manner we have approached the owners of the Valley Office Park located south of the project to obtain permission to provide them with the upgraded landscaping along the common property line boundary as shown on the drawings. All these efforts will significantly reduce the impacts of the site light and glare, as well as further extend the benefits of the landscaping concept initiated by Austin at the East Valley Office Center and continued here in this project. As mentioned in the response to Item 1 the revised design fully meets the city's storm drainage management policy and exceeds the required landscaping area standards. Item 3 Provide a plan for traffic management. We agree to provide traffic mitigation assessment in accordance with city policy. The calculated amount should be based on the 199,000 gross square footage of the building which generates 2350 trips (per ITE, 4th edition, 1987). The Assessment Fee should reflect the $9.00 reduction allowed for alternative commuter program initiation outlined in the letter from the FAA. We are in contact with Metro and will provide a commuter information center in the building lobby and structural pad for a Metro bus shelter if they so desire. Refer to the enclosed letter from Metro. In addition, preferential parking will be assigned for multi-occupant vehicles and van pool use. ,All driveways will be 30' wide at the street curb as shown on revised site plan. The revised site plan drawings provide for; relocation of Lind Avenue street light, street lighting on SW 16th Street, a right turn deceleration lane at Lind Avenue driveway approach channelization of a center two-way left turn lane at glr Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 6 Lind Avenue driveway entrance and a vehicle turn-out for drop-off of passengers on SW 16th Street. We have been advised by Puget Power that all power distribution conductors below 55KV along SW 16th Street are currently underground and no further overhead is planned. We are currently in contact with the Owner's of the Valley Office Park facility discussing possible configurations for a shared driveway entrance at Lind Avenue. To date there has not been any agreement by them to a particular solution for submittal to the City of Renton. Item 4 Substation environmental concerns; a) type and quantity of power generated b) U.S. Department of Energy information indicating safe distances c) site plan revisions if necessary The U.S. Department of Energy, in their publication "Electrical and Biological Defects of Transmission Lines: A Review", indicates that based on 20 years of 7 research, the bulk of scientific evidence indicates that typical exposure by theBPAtransmissionlines (500 KV & 765 KV) poses no health hazards. This is further documented by the Electric Power Research Institute's studies on "EMF and Human Health". We have obtained copies of these studies (approx. 100 pages) and will make them available to you if you desire. Puget Power has advised us the Earlington Substation produces 115 KV_ power. The proposed building is approximately 200' from the oveihecf lines entering the substation. The courtyard outdoor recreational area is approximately 130' from the same lines. Based on the above referenced materials, this location would receive less than 1 milligauss of EMF, or less than the exposure measured in any typical residence. It is the opinion of The Austin Company and Puget Power that the Earlington Substation poses no dangers to the health and welfare of the occupants of the proposed projectduetoEMFexposure. No design revisions have been made for this subject. Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 7 Item 5 Construction Plan addressing; erosion control, wheel-washing, periodic watering of site for dust control, hauling routes and hours which mitigate traffic impacts, and bond of $3,000 for street clean-up. A Site Preparation and Erosion Control Plan showing wheel wash areas was submitted on May 16, 1989. The balance of Construction Plan meeting all City requirements will be submitted to the city for approvals as soon as definition of specific parameters affecting the plan can be ascertained, and prior to commencement of work. Watering trucks and street clean-up will be provided as required depending on work intensity, weather, City requirements, etc. Site Plan/Building Plan Review Issues 1.Storm Drainage Management 2.a Siting for 100 year flood 2.b Future 100 year flood potential 2.c Hazardous material containment for flooding We have included herein our preliminary design for storm drainage system, which includes a basis for design, computer modeling calculations for the system and preliminary design drawings. All of this information substantiates our compliance with the city's adopted storm drainage policies. Final design information will be submitted at the time of building plan review submittal. To date, we have been unable to secure a copy of the 5/4/89 Memo from Storm Water Utility Engineering referenced in the May 18, 1989 letter or a response to our letter to Lynn Guttman May 11, 1989, requesting clarification of requirements and policy. The building floor elevation has been established at 21.5' which is 5.5' above the FEMA 100 year flood plain (16'). All parking surfaces and roadways are a minimum elevation of 18' in accordance with city recommendation and 2'I above 100 year flood. We are pursuing the hold harmless agreement I requested regarding flood damage. We are pursuing the FAA regarding currentorfutureplans (if any) to store hazardous materials on the site, and upon receipt of definitive information regarding possible hazardous materials, a containment plan will be formulated and submitted to the City for approval. kja Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page8 In summation, The Austin Company is committed to compliance with the policies and regulations of the City of Renton with the goal of creating a Regional Headquarters facility for the Federal Aviation Administration which enhances the quality of life of the general community and building tenant alike. We feel this project is of the highest quality and truly an asset to the City of Renton both economically and aesthetically and look forward to working in conjunction with you and your staff to accomplish these goals. If we can be of any assistance, please don't hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, Warren C. Pugh, AIA Manager of Facilities Development enclosures: Scr- 4er"'N. SIN O CURT SMITCH i 6. Director Clit CA' ;. 4 1889°I 44 i t;i 1989 !l- STATE OF WASHINGTON JDEPARTMENT© 68ll OF WILDLIFE i 1 1 eels lvd., MU Creek, WA 98012 Tel. (206) 775-1311 June 27, 1989 Environmental Review Committee Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: SA-030-89; GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING; MDNS Dear Sirs: The Department of Wildlife concurs with the determination for this proposal. We support the mitigation proposed for stormwater retention/detention and biofiltration. These measures are necessary to maintain good water quality for fish and wildlife downstream in the P-1 channel and the Green River. Sincerely, Tony Oppermann Habitat Biologist TO:kh c: Habitat, Olympia a THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. RENTON, WA 98055 COMPANY PHONE: 206/226-8800 TELECOPIER: 206/228-5471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223-01 AU-ST-IC-T377N3 June 23, 1989 PLANNING DRUM OFF'!OF RENTON Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP dUN 2 .7 1989EnvironmentalReviewCommittee12 City of Renton 11 E200MillAvenueSouth Renton, Washington 98055 Reference: GSA/FAA Office Building ECF: SA-030-89 Austin W.O. Number 89-5477D Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is in response to our conversation this date, requesting clarification of specific conditions set forth by the Environmental Review Committee's Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated. As discussed with you this date, the following conditions require additional clarification: Item 3 That the applicant be required to provide a plan for traffic management, subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division, including, but not limited to: a. Assessment for Burlington Industrial Park Benefit Zone. $560,465 Transportation Benefit Zone Assessment fee. 2,845 trips generated at $197. Referencing Lenora Blauman's letter of May 18, 1989, the TAC comment concerning the assessment of trips generated was determined to be 2,730 at 197. In our response to the May 18, 1989, comments we stated "We agree to provide mitigation assessment in accordance with City's policy. The calculated amount should be based on the 199,000 gross SF of the building which generates 2,300 trips (per ITE, 4th Edition, 1987). The assessment should also reflect the $9.00 HOV reduction per trip generated as allowed for implementing a transportation management program per City policy." Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 23, 1989 Page 2 We request that you clarify the following: 1) Is our assessment correct? 2) What formulation and method was used to obtain the 2,845 trips now indicated? 3) If an acceptable transportation management plan is implemented, will the trip generation assessment fee for each trip generated be reduced by 9.00 to $188.00 per trip generated? 4) If the HOV reduction requires separate application, when and in what form would the application be made? 5) Are there other requirements necessary to qualify for the HOV reduction? Item 3 c. Developer to work with Metro to provide a TSM plan which includes: 1) information about, organization of, and preferential treatment for vanpools and carpools; 2) information about and incentives for use of public transit systems; 3) a bus shelter on the west side of Lind Ave.SW nearest to the site. This plan is to be approved by the City's Planning Division and Traffic Engineering Division. A committee comprised of representatives of The Austin Company, GSA, FAA and Metro has been organized to develop a Transportation Management Plan TMP) for this project. 1) When should this plan be submitted to the Planning Division for approval? Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 23, 1989 Page 3 Item 3 f Provide for street lighting on S.W l6th St. Plans to be coordinated with City proposed street improvements on S.W. l6th St. Submit drawings for approval. Item 4 That the applicant install sidewalks, curbs and gutter, lighting and landscaping along S.W. l6th Street from the western property boundary to Lind Avenue South (including the property which traverses the Puget Power Substation) and from the corner of S.W. l6th Street south along Lind Ave to the southern boundary line. (The proponent may prefer to participate in a L.I.D., which would serve to provide financial benefit at some future point for the installation of those and related improvements.) Item 5 That the applicant provide a) on site bicycle parking facilities; b) a five foot wide bicycle lane (including gutters) on S.W. l6th Street in order to facilitate recreational and commuting cyclist. If we elect to participate in the future L.I.D., all off-site street improvements on S.W. 16th Street would be built under the L.I.D. As per our discussion, you stated a bond would be required to be posted equivalent to 150% of the construction cost. Please clarify: 1) When and with whom would this bond be posted? 2) What is the projected start date for S.W. 16th Improvements? 3) What is the anticipated completion date for these improvements? 4) Are there any plans for a future L.I.D. to widen Lind Ave. S.W. to 5 lanes from S.W. 16th Street to the widening at the Vyzis project? Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 23, 1989 Page 4 Item 6 b.3. A containment program for ensuring that materials now (or in the future) stored on the site are not allowed to contaminate the underlying terrain in the event offlooding, in order to protect the wetland areas in the vicinity of the site. Please reference our response of June 5, 1989. The minimum elevation on this site will be approximately 18', 2' above the 100 year flood plain and the building elevation is at 21'-6", 5'-6" above the 100 year flood plain. The outside storage area has been omitted from the project and the FAA has not given any indication of a need to store any hazardous materials within the building. Please clarify if a plan is still necessary and if so what a containment plan should include and how it should be implemented. We appreciate your expedient response to the above mentioned items. If there are any questions or additional information needed please contact me. Si rely, Robert . er Project Co-ordinator Washington State Duane Berentson Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E.30th Place Bellevue,Washington 98007 June 19, 1989 Don Erickson f; Zoning Administrator Planning Division f.) JUN 2 1989 y1, Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South id E El VRenton, WA 98055 SR 405 MP 1.57 CS 1743 Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance Austin Company File No. SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is in response to the Determination of Non Significance (Mitigated) we received from the city of Renton on June 14, 1989. The proposed 5-story/199,000 sq. ft. office building is located on 8. 8 acres at Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street. Since the DNS has already been mitigated,. the Department of Transportation has no further comments on this proposal. On future projects such as this one, we request an earlier opportunity to review and comment on the development proposals that pass through the city' s SEPA review process. Should you have any questions and/or concerns, please feel free to call Donald Hurter ( 562-4274) or Dick' Aust ( 562- 4274) of my Developer section, or myself (562-4267) . Sincerely, S L. LUTZ, P. . istrict Utilities/ Developer Engineer DA:da cc: State Aid CONFERENCE REPORT NAME OF PROJECT: (11A / rAA bOI1.cAV\X0 (1iE s-1)&) (,tea. ) DATE OF CONFERENCE: UU IUE 5) 1489 PROJECT NO. .1f 1~' 030-8 , TIME: 1 'Am r• I . START) END) r NAME AND TITLE OF ORGANIZATION PHONE PEOPLE ATTENDING OERR.1 L.l oc IIALwuv( Qt') . 1.4 -1055,0 AL?5T,N Co . 2.24 WA,ta POGO Au 1.1 226 ..E Pi`lL.,_. Hl.Ax=.d AusTl Ill 2Z Co - S6DD LEivogA % JUMfgj LNG - C.D b 235- 2SSa 6 t p ca., Si,,/v- /e049-Di z 3 5-z G3/ G uL / L 5,14 ev COMMENTS: TC'ACAn June 5, 1989 TO FILE FROM LENORA BLAUMAN SUBJECT GSA BUILDING Staff met with Austin representatives to review revised site plans. The revised site plan relocates the building to the west, adds a courtyard for staff, a drop-off center, a bus shelter, a lighting plan and pedestrian linkage, and an 843 space parking lot. The plan also includes an on site drainage plan,with a 10 year release/retention rate, based upon SCS hydrology, a catch basin, swales and oil-water separation devices. Elevations have been established to address the likelihood of flooding. Off-site improvements include curbs, gutters and sidewalks and lighting along Lind and S.W. 16th, turnout/deceleration lanes, and left turn channelization. The applicant is in negotiation with owners of the property to the south for a joint use driveway. City staff generally expressed their conceptual approval of the revised site plan (except for the parking plan) , the landscaping/recreation plan, the off-site improvements plan, and the storm drainage management plan. There was discussion of the location of the structure and courtyard vis a vis the Puget Power substation; it was agreed that the location of these developments is suitable if, indeed, the substation only produces 115 kV as indicated by the applicant. Discussion focussed on the parking plan. Staff believe that the number of proposed parking stalls --843 -- is too great, noting that this number will cause a significant traffic impact and will prevent a TSM from working effectively because there will be no impetus to participate in TSM if parking is available. I The proponent reported that 843 stalls would only allow 743 parking spaces for 1050 employees, as the remainder of the spaces would need to be reserved for 50 official staff cars and 50 visitors stalls. Staff noted that those 50 stalls for official cars would be vacant for the majority of the business day as they would be in the field. Similarly visitors would be arriving and leaving over the course of the day, and that, as a result, it would be unnecessary to have 50 visitors stalls. Staff also suggested that a number of mitigation measures could/should be undertaken to reduce the number of needed staff parking stalls. These measures should include, but need not be limited to, van pools, car pools, preferred parking for pool vehicles, subsidized bus passes, parking fees, and Metro information booths. A Metro staff member should be invited to work with Austin to coordinate and implement such a program. Staff informed the proponents that additional parking could be pulled from the reserve areas in the event that, after a reasonable trial period, the applicant could document that the TSM and existing parking were insufficient to address parking requirements for staff and visitors. The proponent expressed concern that staff would park off- site if on-site parking were not available -- staff noted that adjacent streets have all lanes assigned for driving, so that off-site parking is not available or allowed. The site plan, as submitted, and accompanied by staff recommendations, will be routed to TAC and ERC at the earliest available date. 4 CONFERENCENCE REPORT NAME OF PROTECT: N UvST\ 6 QM . DATE OF CONFERENCE: 4 I ( 4 "R PROTECT NUMBER: 0 b TIME: START) 4- ; END) NAME AND TITLE OF ORGANIZATION PHONE PEOPLE ATTENDING WAR , G . Pa <o t C 22-(.0 -2,5042. P;14,6+-11cr - 61/W -5T/A.1 Q . Q«e cSrP. e er jr)Ho le d l)ERRf Ls1Nr=3 rLa10k)1r1/4,(40 Ds0. 55'." bll r Ca•x4E! 1 S: I June 1, 1989 TO: FILE FROM; LENORA BLAUMAN SUBJECT; AUSTIN COMPANY GSA/FAA PROJECT (030-89) Jerry Lind and I met with Austin Company representatives, and their attorney, Elaine Spencer, to discuss the project application. Generally, the proponent is interested in obtaining additional information about materials necessary to complete the project application. . Specifically, concerns revolve primarily around parking, landscaping, recreation areas and storm drainage management. In addition to information concerning necessary application revisions, there is concern relating to the nexus of our authority to establish requirements for the project. With respect to parking, staff noted that authority to establish parking requirements is provided by the Site Plan Review Ordinance (4-738) , Parking and Loading Ordinance (4- 2204) -- although that ordinance generally addresses the applicant's right to reserve parking spaces, rather than City authority to place them on hold, and SEPA Rules. As noted previously in meetings with Austin representatives, the City's call for reserve parking is based upon the need to mitigate traffic impacts, to provide a more aesthetic plan, as well as to address landscaping, recreation and storm drainage requirements established by Code and policy. In the event that reserved parking is proven by the applicant to be necessary after a reasonable effort at TSM planning/implementation, the development of the reserve parking may be authorized by the City. Landscaping and recreation requirements were discussed specifically and reference was made to Ordinance sections and policies which trigger such requirements (e.g. Section 4-744, Chapter 28) . Focus was directed to the need to provide off-site buffering and on-site visual relief, to the City's requirements for wildlife sanctuary, and to on-site recreational amenities for GSA employees (the latter being particularly desirable owing to the distance of the site from parks, restaurants, etc. ) . The applicants' reported also that they would like some clarification about specific requirements for storm drainage management (e.g. why biofiltration is being required) , and the nexus for those requirements. A written request for information from Lynn Guttmann has not been answered. Staff will seek an early reply from Ms. Guttmann, but advised Austin to proceed as currently instructed for storm drainage management in order to expedite review of the project. The applicants will submit a revised site plan within a short period of time as they are reportedly working with a contract schedule which requires rapid action on their part. 2 nOl. 17/4..1.1 PYidt4t - Cchnlh 4$ 0 CITY OF RENTON LL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, MayorY Y Lynn Guttmann, Director tLf. r1.'1 1 L•la .A:. June 7, 1989 CITY OF RENTON f5) JuN 9 1989Mr. Robert G. Snyder Project Coordinator I ECEIIVETheAustinCompany 800 Southwest 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Storm Requirements on Austin Company G.S.A/F.A.A Building Dear Mr. Snyder: The storm water development criteria for this project take the form of two general categories - water quality issues and drainage system requirements (detention to control flooding, etc.). Both the water quality and water quantity criteria are outlined below. WATER OUALITY CRITERIA: In an effort to improve water quality of surface runoff, the Storm Water Utilities policy is to usebaffledoil/water separators in conjunction with biofiltering swales to control pollution. These are two forms of identified "Best Management Practices", as outlined by the Puget Sound Water Quality Authority and the EPA. For purposes of applying biofiltration, we have adopted the criteria developed by the King County Surface Water Management in their Draft Surface WaterDesignManual (February, 1989), which requires biofiltration IF: The project proposes to: 1) Discharge a flow greater than 0.2 cubic feet per second for a 100-year, 24-hour duration storm (under existing conditions) to a lake, wetland or stream within 1/4 mile of the proposed project; OR 2) Discharge a flow from a tank or vault detention facility serving a drainage basin with more than one acre of parcel surface subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals; OR 3) Use an infiltration system to serve more than one acre of paved surface subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals; OR Biofiltration will be required on the GSA/FAA site as it exceeds the criteria outlined above in Item Number Two (It has more than one acre of paved surface subject to vehicular traffic). 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 Mr. Robert G. Snyder The Austin Company June 7, 1989 Page Two WATER QUANTITY CRITERIA: Renton's current policy requires the use of the SCS unit hydrograph or other approved method Santa Barbara Unit Hydrograph, SWMM, etc.) to compute detention. The standard detention design storm is th 10-year, 24-hour storm for both existing conditions release rate and detention volume. In addition, the rate of flow leaving the site cannot be increased for the 2-year storm above what is existing for the site (Pre and post development flows will match for both the 2- year and 10-year flows). If the site is within an area which has a known erosion or flooding problem, then the basin can be classified as a "critical drainage basin" and more stringent detention requirements are demanded. The GSA/FAA site is within the Valley Drainage Basin, which has been determined to be a Critical Drainage Area" due to flooding problems and uncertainties regarding flood control in theEastSideGreenRiverBasin. Due to the size of the basin area flowing into the drainage infrastructure and the flatness of the drainage line, the area undergoes periodic floodingindicatingthatthesystemisseverelyundercapacityunderexistingconditions. Policy in the valley area has been to require detention based on the existing system's capacity, provided a drainage analysis shows that the system which the site discharges into has sufficient capacity to carry a 25-year, 24-hour storm. If the receiving system has insufficient capacity, then the release rate will be based upon the year storm which the system can convey (i.e. if the system has capacity for a 2-year, 24-hour storm, then the allowable release rate is reduced to the peak flow off the site for the 2-year, 24-hour storm based on existing conditions) and will utilize25-year, 24-hour storm for detention requirements. (For example, the design would use a 25- year, 24-hour storm for detention with a 2-year release rate.) According to the given quantity criteria, the minimum detention requirements on the GSA/FAA site would be the 10-year detention with a 10-year release rate. If it is determined that the City's conveyance system to which the site drains is under capacity for the 25-year storm, then the requirement would be for 25-year detention with the release rate calculated based on the yearstormcapacityofthereceivingsystem. If you have any further questions about these requirements, feel free to contact the Public Works Department at 235-2569. Very truly yours, Lynn A! uttmann Public Wo ks Director AUSTIN/LAG:GDC:If cc: Lenore Blauman CITY OF RENTON sal COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division June 8, 1989 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on June 8, 1989: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-030-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199,000 square foot (177,000 square feet of leasable space) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. The property is located on Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street. TAXIWAY "B" PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS AND EXTENSION ECF-039-89 Applicant seeks to repave taxiway "B" with asphalt concrete pavement and to extend the taxiway 677 feet to the north. The property is located at the Renton Airport between Logan Ave., Airport Way, and Rainier Ave. North. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CHECKPOINT ECF-041-89 Applicant seeks to consolidate several now-functioning hazardous materials receiving areas by relocating all materials to a single checkpoint in an existing building. The checkpoint will be composed of two adjacent sections including: a) an indoor facility of 1800 square feet, and b) an outside facility of 1600 square feet. The property is located at the corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Ave. S.W. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Environmental Determinti. _ ns June 8, 1989 Page 2 KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-045-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2,700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1 and is currently developed with a small (approximately 600 square foot) office building. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. The property is located at 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E. The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on June 27, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE OMNI GROUP REZONE ECF-037-89 Applicant seeks a non-project, programmatic rezone of an approximately 12,750 square foot parcel from R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Use, to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office in a residential-type structure which would remain on the site; no revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered, however, as the building is an older one, it is conceivable that redevelopment might take place in the foreseeable future. The property is located at 3016 Benson Road South. TELEPHONE CONDUIT FOR RENTON LIBRARY ECF; SME-049-89 Applicant seeks shorelines exemption to install telephone conduit for the Renton Library. The property is located at the Liberty Park Community Center. TELEPHONE CONDUIT FOR CITY HALL ECF; SME-050-89 Applicant seeks shorelines exemption to install a telephone conduit for City Hall. The property is located at the Liberty Park Community Center. TELEPHONE CONDUIT FOR LIBERTY PARK COMMUNITY CENTER ECF; SME-051-89 Applicant seeks shorelines exemption to install telephone conduit to serve the Liberty Park Community Center. The property is located at the Liberty Park Community Center. The Determinations are final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 26, 1989. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Environmental Determin•, is June 8, 1989 Page 3 If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. mc Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James L. Lutz, Department of Transportation AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION 1.1 r ne L avi l le ,beingfirst dulysworn on oath states ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the The Environmental Review Committee ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- VALLEY DAILY NEWS ject(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-030-89) Dailynewspapers six (6) times a week. That said newspapers Applicant seeks site plan approval fors a five publishedstory/199,000 square foot (177,000 square are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six feet of leasable space)office building on an months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published 8.8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. The property is located on Lind Ave-in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King nue and S.W. 16th Street. County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CHECK- POINTnewspaperbyorderoftheSuperiorCourtoftheStateofWashingtonforECF-041-89) seeks to consolidate several now- King County. functioning hazardous materials receiving areas by relocating all materials to a single The notice in the exact form attached, waspublished in the Kent Edition checkpoint int ane composedexngof building. w The checkpoint will be of two adja- Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition_ and not in cent sections including: a)an indoor facility supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers of 1800 square feet, and bl an outside duringfathe below statedperiod. The annexed notice a locatedcty of 1 the600 corneruare feet. The property is at the corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Ave. S.W. Notice of Environmental Determination KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-045-89) Applicant seeks site plan approval for the t t 1 1' 8? R 5 2 % • construction of a 2,700 square foot officewaspublishedon building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approxi- mately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the on the eastern portion of the property, is sum of$ 39 • 5 2 zoned B-1 and is currently developed with a small (approximately 600 square foot) office building. The western section of the property(approximately.277 acre)is zoned Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 p.m. on June 26, 198Subscribedandswornbeforemethis14daofJune19r- _ made tooy appeal of this decision iExaminer, may br, Y the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompa- nied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published June 12, 1989 Valley Daily News R5257 Acct #51067 Notary Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN 487 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-030-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199, 000 square foot 177, 000 square feet of leasable space) office building on an 8 . 8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. The property is located on Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CHECKPOINT ECF-041-89 Applicant seeks to consolidate several now-functioning hazardous materials receiving areas by relocating all materials to a single checkpoint in an existing building. The checkpoint will be composed of two adjacent sections including: a) an indoor facility of 1800 square feet, and b) an outside facility of 1600 square feet. The property is located at the corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Ave. S.W. KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-045-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2 , 700 square foot office building on an approximately . 267 acre section of a property which totals approximately . 544 acres. That . 267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1 and is currently developed with a small (approximately 600 square foot) office building. The western section of the property (approximately . 277 acre) is zoned R-1; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. The property is located at 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5: 00 p.m. , June 27, 1989 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055, . Phone: 235-2550. Published: June 12 , 1989 OT ICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ECF-030-89, SA-030-89 APPLICATION NO. GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING APPLICANT PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A FIVE STORY/199,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON AN 8.8 ACRE PARCEL IN AN OFFICE PARK (OP) ZONE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LIND*AVENUE AND S.W. 16TH STREET POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES J DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY JUNE 27, 1989 . AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION 1-- KA) HEREBYEREBY CERTIFY THATL HE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN CUPIES "OF LACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON ATTEST: Subscribed end sworn to before me, aNotaryPublic, in and for the State of Washingtonresidirin G / I ^ day o 6? on the SIGNED : VW1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-030-89 PROPONENT: Austin Company DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199, 000 square foot office building on an 8 .8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from June 12 , 1989. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , June 27, 1989 , in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: June 12 , 1989 DATE OF DECISION: June 7 , 1989 SIGNATURES: Nybefg Lyn G ttman Community Development Director Public Works Director 1\ IJ t DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT:GSA/FAA Building ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-030-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199, 000 square foot office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street RECOMMENDATIONS:Issue a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide a revised site plan, including 770 parking spaces (with 83 parking spaces identified as being held in reserve and developed with landscaping and/or recreational amenities, subject to the approval of the Planning Division and Traffic Engineering Division. Note: After it has been established that an operable Traffic Management Plan has been in effect for at least one year, the Zoning Administrator shall carry out an evaluation of on-site parking at the applicant's request. If the Zoning Administrator determines that there is an apparent need for additional on-site employees parking, he may release any or all of the parking held in reserve. 2 . That the applicant provide a revised on-site exterior lighting plan, including a combination of planned 30 foot high exterior lighting fixture and pedestrian-scaled lighting fixtures sufficient to illuminate the office structure, parking area, landscaped areas, recreation areas, and site periphery, subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 3 . That the applicant be required to provide a plan for traffic management, subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division, including, but not limited to: a. Assessment for Burlington Industrial Park Benefit Zone. 560, 465. 00 Transportation Benefit Zone Assessment Fee. 2, 845 trips generated at $197 . 00. b. Building required to have a commuter information center. Also preferential parking space is to be assigned to multi- occupant vehicles and van pool uses. c. Developer to work with Metro to provide a TSM plan which includes: 1) information about, organization of, and preferential treatment for vanpools and carpools; 2) information about and incentives for use of public transit systems; 3) a bus shelter on the west side of Lind Ave. SW nearest to site. This plan is to be approved by the City's Planning Division and Traffic Engineering Division. itigatic5n Measures SA/FAA Building age 2 d. Driveway width to be 30' . e. Existing street light in proposed driveway off Lind Ave. SW to be relocated by a City approved lighting contractor not just removed as shown on plan. f. Provide for street lighting on SW 16th St. Plans to be coordinated with City proposed street improvements on SW 16th St. Submit drawings for approval. g. SW 16th St. - Lind Ave. SW to Raymond Ave. SW overhead power distribution conductors below 55KV to be undergrounded and placed under or behind the sidewalk. The developer will need to provide for and make those arrangements with Puget Sound Power & Light Company. h. Lind Ave. SW - a right turn deceleration lane needs to be provided for driveway approach. Submittal of design plans required. i. Provide for channelization of a center lane two way left turn at the driveway entrance off Lind Ave. SW. Channelization plans to be submitted. j . SW 16th St. - Provide vehicle turn-out in front of building for drop-off of passengers on SW 16th St. Show plan on drawing. k. A joint driveway access, if feasible, with the adjoining property to the south of the site (Lind Avenue South) . 1. Signage at the drop-and-ride center indicating a five minute maximum limit for parking on that corridor. m. Marking of the fire lane with striping or signage to prevent vehicle parking along that corridor. 4 . That the applicant install sidewalks, curbs and gutters, lighting and landscaping along S.W. 16th Street from the western property boundary to Lind Avenue South (including the property which traverses the Puget Power Substation) and from the corner at S.W. 16th Street south along Lind Avenue to the southern boundary line. (The proponent may prefer to participate in a L. I.D, which would serve to provide financial benefit at some future point for the installation of those and related improvements. ) 5. That the applicant provide: a) on-site bicycle parking facilities; and b) a five foot wide bicycle lane (including gutters) on S.W. 16th Street, in order to facilitate recreational and commuting cyclists. 6. That the applicant be required to provide the following, at the time of site plan/building plan review: a. Specifications for a plan for storm drainage management which includes: a) a detention system which will meet the following two scenarios: i) if conveyance capacity of the existing City storm system is determined to be sufficient in capacity to address a 25 year storm, then the requirement will be ten year detention with a ten year existing conditions release rate, or ii) if the capacity of the existing system is determined to be less than that necessary to address a 25 year storm, the requirements would be for a 25 year detention system with a release rate being computed under predeveloped conditions for the year storm matching the capacity of the existing system (i. e. if the capacity of the existing system is 2 years, then the release rate will be computed on the 2 year storm) ; and b) a water quality protection system with baffled oil/water separators and 1 itigatioh Measures SA/FAA Building age 3 biofiltration prior to the off-site release of any storm drainage. This plan, which has been authorized in principle, should be subject to approval for specific components by the Public Works Department. b. l. A flood control management system which includes a plan for: a) siting of the structure at an elevation which would ensure protection of that structure and an emergency vehicle parking area during a 100 year flood - (NOTE: the subject site is not in the existing 100 year flood plain) ; and b) a landscaping system which is designed to enhance erosion/flood control management (e.g. berms, plantings which cover and protect soil, etc. ) . This plan should be subject to approval by the City's Storm Water Utility Engineering Division. AND b. 2 . A document which acknowledges that the City has informed the applicant that the subject property is located in an area which may be included in an altered 100 year flood plain assuming the P-1 Channel is not developed) , and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damage to property or person arising from such flooding. This agreement should be subject to approval by the City Attorney. AND b. 3 . A containment program for ensuring that materials now (or in the future) stored on site are not allowed to contaminate the underlying terrain in the event of flooding, in order to protect wetland areas in the vicinity of the site. This plan should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department. Note: The site is not currently in the 100 year flood plain, but that plain may change from current FEMA levels depending on drainage alternatives now being considered by the City, such as the P-1 channel project) . Note: See 5/4/89 Memo and 6/7/89 Memo from Storm Water Utility Engineering for specifications. 7 . That the applicant be required to provide a plan for construction, including: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles prior to their leaving the site to control dust and debris; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust and debris; d) a plan for hauling routes and hauling hours to mitigate traffic impacts; and e) a bond of $3, 000. 00 for street clean-up. These plans should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Police Department, and the Planning Division. Note: At the time of site plan review, the site plan, landscaping plan, recreation plan, and other, related plans, all of which were submitted on June 5, 1989 , which have been approved in principle must be approved in detail by City representatives. Similarly the parking plan will need to be approved. mmdoc 1 i CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division June 9, 1989 Robert G. Snyder The Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 Re: GSA/FAA Office Building 1601 Lind Avenue SW ECF; SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Snyder: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on June 7, 1989 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated with the following conditions: 1.That the applicant provide a revised site plan, including 770 parking spaces (with 83 parking spaces identified as being held in reserve and developed with landscaping and/or recreational amenities, subject to the approval of the Planning Division and Traffic Engineering Division. Note: After it has been established that an operable Traffic Management Plan has been in effect for at least one year, the Zoning Administrator shall carry out an evaluation of on-site parking at the applicant's request. If the Zoning Administrator determines that there is an apparent need for additional on-site employees parking, he may release any or all of the parking held in. reserve. 2.That the applicant provide a revised on-site exterior lighting plan, including a combination of planned 30 foot high exterior lighting fixture and pedestrian-scaled lighting fixtures sufficient to illuminate the office structure, parking area, landscaped areas, recreation areas, and site periphery, subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Robert G. Snyder GSA/FAA Office Building June 9, 1989 Page 2 • 3.That the applicant be required to provide a plan for traffic management, subject to the approval,of the Traffic Engineering Division, including, but not limited to: a.Assessment for Burlington Industrial Park Benefit Zone. $560,465.00 Transportation Benefit Zone Assessment Fee. 2,845 trips generated at 197.00. b.Building required to have a commuter information center. Also preferential parking space is to be assigned to multi-occupant vehicles and van pool uses. c.Developer to work with Metro to provide a TSM plan which includes: 1) information about, organization of, and preferential treatment for vanpools and carpools; 2) information about and incentives for use of public transit systems; 3) a bus shelter on the west side of Lind Ave. SW nearest to site. This plan is to be approved by the City's Planning Division and Traffic Engineering Division. d.Driveway width to be 30'. e.Existing street light in proposed driveway off Lind Ave. SW to be relocated by a City approved lighting contractor not just removed as shown on plan. f.Provide for street lighting on SW 16th St. Plans to be coordinated with City proposed street improvements on SW 16th St. Submit drawings for approval. g.SW 16th St. - Lind Ave. SW to Raymond Ave. SW overhead power distribution conductors below 55KV to be undergrounded and placed under or behind the sidewalk. The developer will need to provide for and make those arrangements with Puget Sound Power & Light Company. h.Lind Ave. SW - a right turn deceleration lane needs to be provided for driveway approach. Submittal of design plans required. i.Provide for channelization of a center lane two way left turn at the driveway entrance off Lind Ave. SW. Channelization plans to be submitted. j.SW 16th St. - Provide vehicle turn-out in front of building for drop-off of passengers on SW 16th St. Show plan on drawing. k.A joint driveway access, if feasible, with the adjoining property to the south of the site (Lind Avenue South). 1.Signage at the drop-and-ride center indicating a five minute maximum limit for parking on that corridor. m. Marking of the fire lane with striping or signage to prevent vehicle parking along that corridor. w Robert G. Snyder GSA/FAA Office BuL.....g June 9, 1989 Page 3 4.That the applicant install sidewalks, curbs and gutters, lighting and landscaping along S.W. 16th Street from the western property boundary to Lind Avenue South including the property which traverses the Puget Power Substation) and from the corner at S.W. 16th Street south along Lind Avenue to the southern boundary line. The proponent may prefer to participate in a L.I.D, which would serve to provide financial benefit at some future point for the installation of those and related improvements.) 5.That the applicant provide: a) on-site bicycle parking facilities; and b) a five foot wide bicycle lane (including gutters) on S.W. 16th Street, in order to facilitate recreational and commuting cyclists. 6.That the applicant be required to provide the following, at the time of site plan/building plan review: a.Specifications for a plan for storm drainage management which includes: a) a detention system which will meet the following two scenarios: i) if conveyance capacity of the existing City storm system is determined to be' sufficient in capacity to address a 25 year storm, then the requirement will be ten year detention with a ten year existing conditions release rate, or ii) if the capacity of the existing system is determined to be less than that necessary to address a 25 year storm, the requirements would be for a 25 year detention system with a release rate being computed under predeveloped conditions for the year storm matching the capacity of the existing system i.e. if the capacity of the existing system is 2 years, then the release rate will be computed on the 2 year storm); and b) a water quality protection system with baffled oil/water separators and biofiltration prior to the off-site release of any storm drainage. This plan, which has been authorized in principle, should be subject to approval for specific components by the Public Works Department. b.1. A flood control management system which includes a plan for: a) siting of the structure at an elevation which would ensure protection of that structure and an emergency vehicle parking area during a 100 year flood - (NOTE: the subject site is not in the existing 100 year flood plain); and b) a landscaping system which is designed to enhance erosion/flood control management (e.g. berms, plantings which cover and protect soil, etc.). This plan should be subject to approval by the City's Storm Water Utility Engineering Division. AND b.2. A document which acknowledges that the City has informed the applicant that the subject property is located in an area which may be included in an altered 100 year flood plain (assuming the P-1 Channel is not developed), and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/orforanydamagetopropertyorpersonarisingfromsuchflooding. This agreement should be subject to approval by the City Attorney. AND I . • Robert G. Snyder GSA/FAA•Office Building June 9, 1989 Page 4 b.3. A containment program for ensuring that materials now (or in the future) stored on site are not allowed to contaminate the underlying terrain in the event of flooding, in order to protect wetland areas in the vicinity of the site. This plan should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department. Note: The site is not currently in the 100 year flood plain, but that plain may change from current FEMA levels depending on drainage alternatives now being considered by the City, such as the P-I channel project). Note: See 5/4/89 Memo and 6/7/89 Memo from Storm Water Utility Engineering for specifications. 7.That the applicant be required to provide a plan for construction, including: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles prior to their leaving the site to control dust and debris; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust and debris; d) a plan for hauling routes and hauling hours to mitigate traffic impacts; and e) a bond of $3,000.00 for street clean-up. These plans should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Police Department, and the Planning Division. Note: At the time of site plan review, the site plan, landscaping plan, recreation plan, and other, related plans, all of which were submitted on June 5, 1989, which have been approved in principle must be approved in detail by City representatives. Similarly the parking plan will need to be approved. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end June 27, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235- 2550 and ask for Lenora Blauman or me. For the Environmental Review Committee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp 5THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. RENTON, WA 98055 COMPANY PHONE: 206/226-8800 TELECOPIER: 206/228-5471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS• BUILDERS 223-01 AU-ST-IC-T377N3 p June 5, 1989 cN/40oifris Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP joyEnvironmentalReviewCommitteec:. 5 ,98gCityofRenton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: GSA/FAA Office Building ECF-SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Erickson: This is in response to the City's letter of May 18,1989 and clarification letter of May 30, 1989. We appreciate Lenora Blauman and Jerry Lind taking time to meet with us so that we could better understand the City's concerns in requesting the proposed mitigating conditions. As a result, we have significantly modified our site and landscaping design for the project and are providing the following revised and/or additional information for your staff's review: A. A revised Site Plan which increases and relocates landscaping areas; creates a landscaped courtyard with benches and a fountain; adds a landscaped terrace waiting and gathering area; reduces parking; provides walking trails and pedestrian access routes to building from site perimeter and parking areas; establishes a commuter "stop drop" zone, deceleration lane, 2-way left turn lane, and a bus shelter location; and indicates the site lighting design which achieves 1.5 footcandles (min.) lighting level throughout. B. A revised Landscaping Design scheme which increases plant material maturity, quantity and diversity and raises the total area of pervious landscaped surfaces. The resultant landscaping design effectively mitigates the visual impact of the parking areas and project massing on the surrounding community as well as the individual occupant. In addition, the treatment of the perimeter landscaping works well with the existing East Valley Office Center landscaping to provide cohesive visual design statement at Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 2 the northern entrance to the valley on Lind Avenue at its intersection with 16th. An artist's renderings of the courtyard and terrace designs are provided for your reference as well as a project site model. Also provided are: 1. A complete tabulation of the landscaped area calculations which substantiates our compliance with the zoning ordinance requirements for landscaping percentages. 2. Storm drainage system basis of design,preliminary drawings and calculations which substantiate compliance with 25 year storm peak flow capacity as well as City Ordinances for water quality protection and storm drainage. In addition the design provides for supplemental pollution filtration utilizing surface plant materials. 3. A letter from the Federal Aviation Administration (building tenant) substantiating their commitment to mass transit programs, van pools and car pooling for more than 25% of their staff commuting needs and validating the necessity for the parking quantities proposed. 4. Site grading plan which substantiates building floor elevation 5.5' above current FEMA 100 year flood plain and all parking surfaces located at or above the City recommended elevation of 18', (2' above 100 year flood). 5. Letter from Puget Power indicating the impact their substation has on this project. 6. Letter from Metro regarding their participation in and desires for a bus shelter on the west side of Lind Avenue adjacent to this project. We wish to address each of the requested conditions outlined in your correspondence in light of the revisions described above, and where we are unable to respond precisely as requested, explain how we believe we have addressed the City's concerns. Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 3 Item 1 a) Reduce initial parking to 677 spaces with 146 spaces held in reserve (Renton code 4- 2208(12)). b) Plan for on-site recreation areas (picnicking, congregating, walking trails) c) Provide on-site exterior lighting at pedestrian scale. d) Provide pedestrian pathways to link building with parking, recreation areas and adjacent right-of-ways. We understand this request was motivated by three concerns. First is the goal of creating a more "campus-like" setting with "user-friendly" amenities on the site. Second is the desire to ensure that the plans comply with city policy concerning storm drainage runoff, and has as much pervious surface as is necessary to do that. Third is an effort to ensure that the goals of the VTIP study of achieving a 20 percent reduction in single-occupancy commuter vehicles are reached within new development. Our revised site plan design, attached, reduces our parking layout to 843 parking spaces (61% standard & 39% compact), which we believe responds to the first concern in several important ways. First, it substantially increases the quantity, maturity and variety of the street-frontage landscaping which affords significant softening of the project visual impact on the surrounding community. It also provides a visual relief from the intense street scene for the on-site occupant. Second, the redesign concentrates significant amounts of landscaped areas and materials to create a large landscaped courtyard west of the building and a garden terrace along the eastern side of the facility. Both areas provide pedestrian scaled areas with bench seating amenities to stimulate user congregating, picnicking, and comfortable areas to relax and wait for rides, etc. The courtyard area which utilizes grasscrete permeable surfacing also has a fountain and is located near the employee cafeteria area. Third, the landscaping within the parking areas has been increased in maturity, quantity and variety and utilizes a series of pedestrian pathways linking the parking areas, recreation areas and adjacent perimeter right-of-ways with the y>, Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5f 1989 Page 4 facility as well as providing walking trails for recreation. These pathways are illuminated with pedestrian scale bollards to afford excellent security and safety when combined with the parking area lighting system which provides a 1.5 to 4 footcandles of lighting throughout the site. We have included a complete area tabulation of landscaping on the site which substantiates that the design exceeds the requirement of Renton Code 4-718(5) in terms of area of landscaping provided. We feel the artist's renderings of the site amenity areas and the scale model of the site help to communicate the campus-like, inviting atmosphere which we have strived to create in the redesign of the project. With respect to the second concern for storm water management, we have submitted our storm water system basis for design which includes computer based modeling of the system as well as preliminary design drawings for the system, all of which demonstrate that the storm drainage system planned complies fully with the city's adopted storm drainage policies. In addition we have provided plant material/ground cover at 460 parking stalls in the 2' overhang area between the wheelstop and the landscaping area. This material, while not utilized in satisfying required landscape area, does reduce the amount of impervious surfacing by more than 8,000 square feet (over 2% of the total site area). Regarding the third concern to reduce single-occupancy vehicle commuter cars, we believe that policy will be fully achieved with the 843 parking stalls which our plan proposes. Indeed, we cannot comply with the requirement of Section 4-2208(12) that before parking can be held in reserve the applicant must provide data which substantiates a reduced need because the facts simply do not support it. The provided letter from the FAA substantiates that at move-in, the FAA expects to have 1050 employees working in the building at one time. If 20 percent of these come by other than single-occupancy vehicles, there would be a need for 840 stalls for commuters. In addition, the FAA will have from 40 to 50 government vehicles which cannot be used for commuting and which must be parked on site. It also needs approximately 50 visitor parking spaces. That means that of the 843 parking spaces, as few as 743 will be available to commuters. This means that the FAA will substantially exceed the city's goal of 20 percent reduction in single-occupancy vehicles. The FAA expects to achieve this through a combination of van pools, preferential parking for car pools, and encouraging Metro ridership which will also be supported by the commuter information center being provided as a part of the project in the building lobby. LJ Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 5 Item 2 Revise landscaping to address aesthetic impacts, light and glare impacts, and to accommodate storm drainage management. Beyond the substantial improvements mentioned in the response to Item 1 above significant landscaping increases have been accomplished in the revised plan. The perimeter landscaping along Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street mirror the design we provided in Phase II of the East Valley Office Center project across Lind Avenue. The dominant feature will be a colonnade of 4-inch caliper oaks, which in conjunction with the oaks on the neighboring site create a boulevard appearance to S.W. 16th Street and Lind Avenue as the entrance to the to the valley office park zone. In addition to our own site landscaping, we are currently working to obtain Puget Powers permission to continue the landscaping scheme across the perimeter of their site as shown on the design drawings. In a similar manner we have approached the owners of the Valley Office Park located south of the project to obtain permission to provide them with the upgraded landscaping along the common property line boundary as shown on the drawings. All these efforts will significantly reduce the impacts of the site light and glare, as well as further extend the benefits of the landscaping concept initiated by Austin at the East Valley Office Center and continued here in this project. As mentioned in the response to Item 1 the revised design fully meets the city's storm drainage management policy and exceeds the required landscaping area standards. Item 3 Provide a plan for traffic management. We agree to provide traffic mitigation assessment in accordance with city policy. The calculated amount should be based on the 199,000 gross square footage of the building which generates 2350 trips (per ITE, 4th edition, 1987). The Assessment Fee should reflect the $9.00 reduction allowed for alternative commuter program initiation outlined in the letter from the FAA. We are in contact with Metro and will provide a commuter information center in the building lobby and structural pad for a Metro bus shelter if they so desire. Refer to the.enclosed letter from Metro. In addition, preferential parking will be assigned for multi-occupant vehicles and van pool use. All driveways will be 30' wide at the street curb as shown on revised site plan. The revised site plan drawings provide for; relocation of Lind Avenue street light, street lighting on SW 16th Street, a right turn deceleration lane at Lind Avenue driveway approach channelization of a center two-way left turn lane at Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 6 Lind Avenue driveway entrance and a vehicle turn-out for drop-off of passengers on SW 16th Street. We have been advised by Puget Power that all power distribution conductors below 55KV along SW 16th Street are currently underground and no further overhead is planned. We are currently in contact with the Owner's of the Valley Office Park facility discussing possible configurations for a shared driveway entrance at Lind Avenue. To date there has not been any agreement by them to a particular solution for submittal to the City of Renton. Item 4 Substation environmental concerns; a) type and quantity of power generated b) U.S. Department of Energy information indicating safe distances c) site plan revisions if necessary The U.S. Department of Energy, in their publication "Electrical and Biological Defects of Transmission Lines: A Review", indicates that based on 20 years of research, the bulk of scientific evidence indicates that typical exposure by the BPA transmission lines (500 KV & 765 KV) poses no health hazards. This is further documented by the Electric Power Research Institute's studies on "EMF and Human Health". We have obtained copies of these studies (approx. 100 pages) and will make them available to you if you desire. Puget Power has advised us the Earlington Substation produces 115 KV power. The proposed building is approximately 200' from the overhead lines entering the substation. The courtyard outdoor recreational area is approximately 130' from the same lines. Based on the above referenced materials, this location would receive less than 1 milligauss of EMF, or less than the exposure measured in any typical residence. It is the opinion of The Austin Company and Puget Power that the Earlington Substation poses no dangers to the health and welfare of the occupants of the proposed project due to EMF exposure. No design revisions have been made for this subject. Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 7 Item 5 Construction Plan addressing; erosion control, wheel-washing, periodic watering of site for dust control, hauling routes and hours which mitigate traffic impacts, and bond of $3,000 for street clean-up. A Site Preparation and Erosion Control Plan showing wheel wash areas was submitted on May 16, 1989. The balance of Construction Plan meeting all City requirements will be submitted to the city for approvals as soon as definition of specific parameters affecting the plan can be ascertained, and prior to commencement of work. Watering trucks and street clean-up will be provided as required depending on work intensity, weather, City requirements, etc. Site Plan/Building Plan Review Issues 1. Storm Drainage Management 2.a Siting for 100 year flood 2.b Future 100 year flood potential 2.c Hazardous material containment for flooding We have included herein our preliminary design for storm drainage system, which includes a basis for design, computer modeling calculations for the system and preliminary design drawings. All of this information substantiates our compliance with the city's adopted storm drainage policies. Final design information will be submitted at the time of building plan review submittal. To date, we have been unable to secure a copy of the 5/4/89 Memo from Storm Water Utility Engineering referenced in the May 18, 1989 letter or a response to our letter to Lynn Guttman May 11, 1989, requesting clarification of requirements and policy. The building floor elevation has been established at 21.5' which is 5.5' above the FEMA 100 year flood plain (16'). All parking surfaces and roadways are a minimum elevation of 18' in accordance with city recommendation and 2' above 100 year flood. We are pursuing the hold harmless agreement requested regarding flood damage. We are pursuing the FAA regarding current or future plans (if any) to store hazardous materials on the site, and upon receipt of definitive information regarding possible hazardous materials, a containment plan will be formulated and submitted to the City for approval. I Mr. Donald Erickson, AICP June 5, 1989 Page 8 In summation, The Austin Company is committed to compliance with the policies and regulations of the City of Renton with the goal of creating a Regional Headquarters facility for the Federal Aviation Administration which enhances the quality of life of the general community and building tenant alike. We feel this project is of the highest quality and truly an asset to the City of Renton both economically and aesthetically and look forward to working in conjunction with you and your staff to accomplish these goals. If we can be of any assistance, please don't hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, Warren C. Pugh, AIA Manager of Facilities Development enclosures: nl P JVN cm, BASIS OF DESIGN r'h 5108,9 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING SITE June 5, 1989 1. Method of Analysis Drainage calculations were performed using the HEC-1 computer program. The HEC- 1 model simulates the surface runoff response of a drainage system to rainfall by representing the drainage system as a interconnected system of subbasins. Results of these calculations are attached to this document. SCS Runoff Curve Numbers are used in the model to represent varying degrees of surface permeability ranging from asphalt pavement to undeveloped vegetated areas. 2. Design Storm A 24-hour design storm duration was used as a basis for evaluating existing and proposed system capacity and for determining required detention storage. A Soil Conservation Service Type IA precipitation distribution was used in the HEC-1 model to represent typical rainfall distribution west of the Cascades. A Total 24-hour rainfall of 2.9 inches was used for a 10-year storm and 3.4 inches was used for the total precipitation for a 25-year storm. These rainfall amounts were obtained from Figures 3.5.1E and 3.5.1F in the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 3. Analysis Of Existing Drainage System 3.1 Existing Flows Off GSA/FAA Site Existing storm flow prior to the proposed development of the site was evaluated as a basis for sizing the required detention facilities For analysis purposes, the existing site was subdivided into 2 subbasins. The eastern portion consists of mostly brush over loosely consolidated soil. Most of the precipitation over this area infiltrates into the soil or is retained in the existing vegetation. What runoff does occur flows slowly into the western portions of the site. The western portion of the site consists of an abandoned gravel parking area which drains into an abandoned storm drain system which, in turn, drains toward the west into the storm drain on Raymond Avenue. 3.2 Capacity of Existing Storm Drain System The capacity of the existing storm drains running along Raymond Avenue and Lind Avenue were evaluated for existing conditions for a 25-year, 24-hour design storm. Flow capacities were determined based on best available information obtained from as-built design plans supplied by the City of Renton Public Works Department. Basis of Design GSA/FAA Storm Drainage System Page 2 The HEC-1 model was used to compute existing flows based on available information on the existing drainage areas tributary to these storm drains. Analysis results show that the Raymond Avenue storm drain has adequate capacity to convey 25-year, 24-hour storm flows. The storm drain running along Lind Avenue does not have adequate capacity for a 25-year, 24-hour storm. 4. Proposed Drainage System For New Development The drainage system for the proposed development has been designed so that storm flows will be released into the existing storm drain on Raymond Avenue. Since the present capacity of the Raymond Avenue storm drain is adequate for a 25- year, 24-hour storm, the required detention facilities will be designed to provide detention storage for a 10-year, 24-hour design storm with the allowable release rate not to exceed the existing peak flow for a 10-year storm. Paved surfaces will be graded to drain to catch basins. The collected runoff will be piped through storm drains which will be sized for a 25-year, 24-hour storm. Detention will be accomplished by using the underground system and surface parking. Flows released from the detention facility control structure will be routed through an oil/water separator. The effluent flow from the oil/water separator will then be routed through a grass-lined swale prior to discharging into the Raymond Avenue storm drain. SuAj oF RAtt..u.GE CALC5 , Fe_ckL I ST1 F10 of f G 5 5 tom. FoY I ® - e-ar Stor -rn I Gt5 k\\0 c,k G l ; tf to F.a yn o-r,c k li '- • Sto Y for pro ro '"e.-d e-lo -a.4 6 cf5 R.tA Y q 0\ e,I e..'r-I (Tr S1-0Y Q e._ Ga 01 G r t for of 10 e,a tr ) 2 o U Y 5tO r-rY. tioIo - a r r e_a s e. - 0.1i aGr e--ft• 7_ 17350o GU • Ft • ) m-fiac.Ie,c1 : 4E C — , A,iaf 5 ;5 for ;Y t 1 ) z5 -1r Slo rw• -to Qay'rncrr,el eve . SD - .ti51 co-01 a ) I o -\{v. 5To rl-rN- G 5-A site. - E 11 C0-45 I 0 -\fr. Sfi'o r-m - G-5 A site. - Dedel o pj 44. J 1 p' R a) Th 4 J kv e , 5tom cr4e. l Uate- fo a__S - ye..c.!r Itoj-yr, 06-03-1989 12:13:50.80 HEC-1 INPUT PAGE 1 LINE ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DIAGRAM 1 ID DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR FAA BUILDING-CAPACITY OF RAYMOND AVE. STORM DRAIN 2 ID NEC-1 MODEL (25YR-24 HR STORM? FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 IT 10 200 4 IO 5 5 KK SUB 1 RUNOFF FROM EXISTING SUBBASIN 1 6 KM RUNOFF FROM PUGET POWER SUBSTATION 7 BA .001 8 PB 3.4 ( z5 -`(r. ) 9 PC .004 .008 .012 .016 .020 .024 .028 .032 .036 .040 10 PC .045 .050 .055 .060 .065 .070 .076 .082 .083 .094 11 PC .100 .106 .113 .120 .127 .134 .141 .148 .1562 .1644 12 PC .1726 .1808 .1890 .1972 .2067 .2162 .2257 .2352 .2447 .2552 13 PC .2676 .2810 .2944 .3124 .3304 .3644 .4184 .4454 .4634 .4763 14 PC .4502 .5036 .5124 .5212 .5300 .538S .5175 .5564 .5652 .5i50 15 PC .5528 .5916 .6004 .6092 .61.64 .6236 .6308 .6380 .6452 .6524 16 PC .6596 .6663 .6740 .6812 .6884 .6356 .7013 .7070 .7127 .7134 17 PC .7241 .7298 .7355 .7412 .7469 .7526 .7583 .7640 .7690 .7740 18 PC .7790 .7840 .7890 .7540 .7550 .8040 .8030 .8140 .8190 .8240 19 PC .825 .832 .836 .84 .844 .848 .852 .856 .86 .864 20 PC .868 .872 .876 .88 .884 .838 .892 .856 .90 .904 21 PC .908 .912 .916 .92 .924 .928 .932 .936 .94 .944 22 PC .948 .952 .956 .96 .964 .968 .972 .976 .98 .984 23 PC .983 .992 .956 1.000 24 LS 0 89 25 UK 200 .01 .15 100 26 RK 400 .01 .012 .001 CIRC 1 27 KK SD 28 KM ROUTE FLOWS FROM SUBBASIN 1 THROGH RAYMOND AVE. 12-INCH STORM DRRIN 29 RK 262 .002 .012 CIRC 1 30 KK SUB2A RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 2A 31 KM RUNOFF FROM ERSTERN PORTION OF UNDEVELOPED GSA SITE 32 BA .007 • 33 LS 0 61 34 UK 520 .011 .3 100 35 RK 190 .005 .012 .007 CIRC 1.5 36 KK SUB2B RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 25 37 K5 RUNOFF FROM 'WESTERN PORTION OF uNDEvELOPED GSA SITE 38 BA .004 39 LS 0 85 40 UK 90 .01 .20 100 41 RK 130 .005 .012 .004 42 RN 320 .005 .012 .004 CIRC 2 43 KK CON 1 44 KM COMBINE FLOW FROM SUBBASINS 2A AND 28 (UNDEVELOPED OSA SITE) 45 HC 2 06-03-1989 12:13:51.79 HEC-1 INPUT PAGE 2 LINE ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 46 KM SUB 3 RUNOFF FRO'; SUBBASIN 3 47 KM RUNOFF FROM GROUP HEALTH WAREOSE FACILITY 48 BA .004 45 LS 0 95 50 UK 100 .01 .10 100 51 RK 600 .005 .012 .004 CIRC 2 52 KM SUB 4 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 4 53 KM RUNOFF FROM VALLEY OFFICE PARK 54 BA .003 55 LS 0 95 56 UK 120 .006 .10 100 57 RK 470 .00E .012 .003 ESC 1 58 KM COM 2 59 KM COMBINE FLOWS FROM COM 1 AND SUBBASINS 1,3 AND 4 60 KO 1 2 61 HC 4 62 KM SD 63 KM ROUTE FLOWS FROM COM 2 THROUGH RAYMOND AVE. 21-INCH STORM DRAIN 64 R4 190 .0013 .012 CIRC 1.75 65 KM SD 66 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH RAYMOND AVE. 24-INCH STORM DRAIN . 67 RK 301 .0022 .012 CIRC 2 68 KM SD 69 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH RAYMOND AVE. 27-INCH STORM DRAIN 70 RK 192 .0049 .012 CIRC 2.25 71 ZZ SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF STREAM NETWORK - k x'5T I N G Co No inI o N 5) INPUT LINE CV) ROUTING DIVERSION OR PUMP FLOW NO.C.) CONNECTOR RETURN OF DIVERTED OR PUMPED FLOW 5 SUB 1 ( Pu 4 Po we t- 5ub5ta •) V 27 IZ SD 30 SUB2A (G5A Site. - East PoYI 'err, 36 SUB2B CG51\ 5ike - We_s1 orlior 43 COM 1 46 SUB 3 ( CYrou Hean War 5• 52 SUB 4 ( Va gel o F fi ce- Park ) 58 COM 2 V V 62 2I SD V V 65 7_9 SD V V 68 --2:3 SD RUNOFF ALSO COMPUTED AT THIS LOCATION 1VCVV 1JU 1 10210 140 10220 150 10230 16.0 10240 17.0 F L,0 W ( C,F S 10250 18. 0 10300 19. 0 . 10310 24. 0 Z.•o 3,. 4 ,o 10320 21 0 I•r° 5 . a 0 10330 22. 0 . 10340 23. 0 Jt f' .3 . 10350 24. 0 . 1 o 10400 25. 0 . 4 f. 3 • 10410 26. 0 . A . O 10420 27. 0 ZZ. t7 10430 28.0 . V • I 1 ' 10440 29.0 . N O • 7 10450 30. 0. 10500 31 0 m 10510 32. 0 7, 1 10520 33. 0 0 10530 34. 0 cn -1 O 10540 35. G O 3---, 7v 10550 36. 0 . P cn • 3 10600 37. 0 . o 10610 38. 0 . 7n • C7 10620 39. 0 . 3 . y 10630 40. 0 . 10640 41 0 ti • . . . 10650 42. 70 . l 10700 43. D '111 10710 44. Z ' - 0 10720 45. 1 10730 46. Z 10740 47. GI 10750 48. n 10804 49. p 10810 50. Z 10820 51 10830 52. 10840 53. 0 • o 10850 54. 0 Z 10900 55. p . 0 10910 56. 0 T-- . 10920 57. V . 0 10930 58. 0 10940 59. 0 . 0 . 10950 60. 0 . 11000 61 0 it 11010 62. 0 11020 63. 0 U . 11030 64. 0 N . 11040 65. 0 11054 66. 0 n 11100 67. 0 11110 68. 0 11120 69. 0 11130 70. 0 11140 71 0 11150 72. 0 11200 73. 0 11210 74. 0 11220 75. 0 RUNOFF SUMMARY FLOW IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND TIME IN HOURS, AREA IN SQUARE MILES PEAK TINE OF AVERAGE FLOW FOR MAXIMUM PERIOD BASIN MAXIMUM TIME OFOPERATIONSTATIONFLOWPEAK6-HOUR 24-HOUR 72-HOUR AREA STAGE MAX STAGE HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 1 0. 8.00 0. 0. 0. 00 ROUTED TO 12." SD 0. 8.00 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB2A 0. 14.50 0. 0. 0. 01 HYDROGRAPH AT SUP2B 1. 8.00 0. 0. 0. 00 2 COMBINED AT COM 1 1. 8.00 0. 0. 0. 01 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 3 2. 7.83 1. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 4 2. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 4 COMBINED AT COM 2 5. 7.83 2. 1. 1. 02 ROUTED TO 2 I,, SD 5. 7.83 2. 1. 1. 02 ROUTED TO 9 SD 5. 7.83 2. 1. 1. 02 ROUTED TO 2j" SD 5. 8.00 2. 1. 1. 02 NORMAL END OF HEC-1 *** Ca Q ;". of 7_, ... i.„J, stor 6.Z cfs •(.flow,,,9 fUII )P 06-02-1989 13:07:06.69 HEC-1 INPUT PAGE 1 LINE ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DIAGRA?": 1 ID DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR FAA BUILDING 2 ID HEC-1 MODEL (10YR-24 HR STOR ) FOR 1IETING CONDITIONS FOR GSA SITE 3 IT 10 200 4 ID 5 5 KK SUB 1 RUNOFF FROM EXISTING S_•%3A i a sl e rti, Po rtio of G 5 A 5;re- ) 6 BA .007 7 PB 2.90 ( 10 -Yr. ) 8 PC .004 .008 .0:2 .016 .020 .024 028 .032 .036 .040 9 PC .045 .050 .055 .060 .065 .070 .076 .082 .088 .094 10 PC .100 .106 .113 .120 .127 .134 .141 .146 .1562 .1644 11 P 2 19 19 06 .-. 2257 2: 2 2 2512tC .1rL ._UB .1891J .. 72 .2:ur .__e_ .LL I .L•JC .L49I .L•i'L 1J 1( 7 26 + 13 ('7 4•- 46 14LFL .LSIJ .LV11J .L:44 .J:24 .33.1- • 'J4'i .4.84 .44r'+ • Jv .4763 13 PC .4902 .5036 .5124 .5212 .53'0 .5388 .5476 .5364 .56 52 .3740 14 PC .5828 .5916 .6004 .6092 .616 .6236 .6308 .6380 .6-52 .6524 15 PC .6556 .6668 .6740 .6812 .6864 .6956 .7013 .7070 .7127 .7184 16 PC .7241 .7E98 .7355 .7412 .7469 .7526 .7583 .7640 .7630 .7740 17 PC .7790 .7840 .7890 .7940 .7999 .8040 .8090 .8140 .8130 .8240 18 PC .825 .832 .836 .34 .844 .848 .852 .856 .86 .864 19 PC .868 .872 .876 .88 .884 .866 .892 .896 .30 .904 20 PC .908 .912 .916 .92 .9924 .928 .932 .936 .94 .944 21 PC .948 .952 .956 .96 .964 .968 .972 .975 .98 .984 22 PC .988 .992 .996 1.000 23 LS 0 61 24 UK 520 .011 .3 100 25 RK 187 .005 .012 .007 GEC 1.5 26 KK SUB 2 RUNOFF FRUEi EXISTING SU 3ASIN 2 (We.ste-Y'`, o rti o f C; 5 A 5 itt. 27 BA .0044 ES LS 0 85 29 UK 90 .01 .20 100 30 RK 130 .005 .012 .0044 CIRC 1.5 31 R;4 320 .005 .012 .0044 CIK,2 32 KK CO" 1 33 . K7 COMBINE FLOWS FROM SUBBASINS 1 A:D 2 34 NC 2 35 ZZ RUNOFF SUMMARY FLOW IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND THE IN HOURS, AREA IN SQUARE MILES PEAK TIME OF AVERAGE FLOW FOR MAXIMUM PERIOD BASIN M ti,',.r TIME OF OPERATION STATION FLOW PEAK 6-HCUR 24-HOUR 72-HOUR AREA STAGE MAX STAG_ cFs) HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 1 0. 24.00 0. 0. 0. 01 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 2 1. 8.00 0. 0. 0. 00 2 COMBINED AT CON 1 I.* 8.00 0. 0. 0. 01 NORMAL END OF NEC-1 if** II II I N v e , sto r-r-+ drain from knowabl te, Vele,gSe- to RaT1-r o t e-14ior I aci I it/ I , 1 ti 06-04-1989 16:53:11.14 NEC-1 INPUT PAGE 1 LINE ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DIAGRAM 1 ID DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR FAA BUILDING 2 ID NEC-1 MODEL (5YRR-24 HR STORM) FOR DEi)ELOPED COHDS,-DRAIN TO RAYMO;ND AVE 3 IT 10 200 4 ID 5 5 KK SUB 1 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 1 (NORTHWEST CORNER) 6 BA .001 7 PB 2.9 ( 10 - I/R' ) 8 PC .004 .008 .012 .016 .020 .024 .028 .032 .036 .040 9 PC .045 .050 .055 .060 .065 .070 076 .082 .088 .094 10 PC .100 .106 .113 .120 .127 .134 .141 .148 .1562 .1644 11 • PC .172S .1808 .1890 .1972 .2067 .2162 .2257 .2352 .2447 .2552 12 PC .2675 .2810 .2944 .3124 .3304 .3644 .4184 .4454 .4634 .4768 r r 5 5 5; 533Ep r 55r 5 5213Pi. .4:u2 .J(1J6 .J_2 .JC1 .Ju J'J .J O .J4r6 .JJU4 .JCJ .5/40 14 PC .5823 .5916 .6004 .6092 .6164 .6236 .6308 .6380 .6452 .6524 15 PC .6596 .6668 .6740 .6812 .6884 .6956 .7013 .7070 .7127 .7184 16 PC .7241 .7298 .7355 .7412 .7469 .7526 .7583 .7640 .7690 .7740 17 PC .7790 .7840 .7890 .7940 .7990 .8040 .8090 .8140 .8190 .8240 18 PC .828 .832 .836 .84 .844 .848 .852 .856 .86 .864 19 PC .868 .872 .876 .88 .884 .888 .892 .896 .90 .904 20 PC .908 .912 .916 .92 .924 .328 .932 .936 .94 .344 21 PC .948 .952 .956 .96 .964 .968 .972 .976 .98 .984 22 PC .988 .992 .996 1.000 23 LS 0 95 24 UK 110 .0125 .10 100 25 RK 1 .003 .012 .001 CIRC 1 26 Kr; Sig 1 27 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH 12-INCH STORM 28 RK 110 .003 .012 CIRC 1 29 KK SUB 2 RUNOFF FROM SUBBRSIN 2 30 BR .001 31 . LS 0 95 32 UK 110 .0125 .10 100 33 RK 1 .003 .012 .001 CIRC 1 34 KK COM 1 35 KM COMBINE FLOWS FROM SD 1 AND SUBBRSIN 2 36 HC 2 37 KK SD2 38 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH 18-INCH STORM DRAIN . 39 RK 75 .003 .012 CIRC 1.5 40 KK SUB 3 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 3 41 BA .0003 42 LS 0 95 43 UK 100 .0125 .10 100 44 RK 1 .003 .0:2 .0003 CIRC 1 j 06-04-1989 16:53:42.56 •HEC-1 INPUT RAGE 2 LINE ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 45 KK COM 2 46 KM COMBINE FLOWS FROM SD 2 AND SLBBASiH 3 47 HO 2 48 KK SD 3 49 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH 18-INCH STORM DRAIN 50 RK 70 .003 .012 CIRC 1.5 51 KK SUB 5 RUNOFF FROM SUEBASIN 5 (SOUTHWEST CORNER) 52 EA .0005 53 LS 0 95 54 UK 120 .0125 ..10 1000 55 RK 100 .003 .012 .0005 CIRC 1 56 KK SUB 4 RUNOFF FROM SUEEASIH 4 57 EA .0005 58 • LS 0 95 59 UK 100 .0125 .10 100 60 RK 1 .003 .012 .0005 CIRO 1 61 KK CO.M3 62 KM COMBINE FLOWS FROM SD 3 AND SUEEASI`4S 4 AND 5 63 NC 3 64 KK SD4 65 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH 18-INCH STORM DRAIN 66 RK 160 .003 .012 CIRC 1.5 67 KK SUB 6 . RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 6 68 BA .0004 69 LS 0 95 70 UK 80 .0125 .10 100 71 RK 70 .003 .012 .0004 CIRC 1 72 KK SUB(( 7 RUNOFF FROM SUEEASIN 7 73 EA .0004 74 LS 0 95 75 UK • 70 .0125 .10 100 76 RK 1 .003 .012 .0004 CIRC 77 KK SUB 8 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASiN 8 78 EA .0004 79 LS 0 95 80 UK 100 .0125 .10 100 31 RK 100 .003 .012 .0004 CIRC 1 84 HC 4 , , 06-04-1989 16:53:43.83 HEC-1 INPUT PAGE 3 LINE ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3 10 85 KM SD 5 86 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH 24-INCH STORM DRAIN 87 RK 150 .003 .012 CIRC 2 88 KM SUB 9 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIM 9 89 BA .0005 90 LS 0 95 91 UK 80 .0125 .10 100 92 RK 70 .003 .012 .0005 CIRC 1 93 KM SUB 10 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 10 94 BA .0004 95 LS 0 95 96 UK 70 .0125 .10 100 97 RK 1 .003 .012 .0004 CIRC 1 98 KM SUB 11 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 11 99 BA .0004 100 LS 0 95 101 UK 100 .0125 .10 100 102 RK 100 .003 .012 .0004 CIRC 1 103 KM COM 5 104 KM COMBINE FLOWS FROM SD 5 AND SUBBASINS 9,10 AND 11 105 HC 4 106 KM 107 KM DIVERT FLOWS FOR FUTURE COMBINATION WITH COMPUTED FLOWS FROM EAST SIDE 108 DT DSD6 109 DI 2 4 6 8 110 DO 2 4 6 8 111 KM SUB 12 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 12 (NORTHEAST CORNER) 112 BA .0007 113.. LS .0 95 114 UK 90 .0125 .10 100 115 RK 1 .003 .012 .0007 CIRC 12 116 KK SD 7 117 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH 12-INCH STORM DRAIN 118 RK 120 .003 .012 CIRC 1 121 LS 0 9:1 122 UK 134 0125 .10 100 123 RK 1 .003 .012 .0008 CIRC . 12 124 KK COM6 125 KM COMBINE FLOWS FROM SD 7 AND SUBBASIN 13 126 HC 2 06-04-1989 16:53:45.15 HEC-1 INPUT PAGE 4 LINE ID 1 2 4 56 7 8 9 10 127 KM SD 8 128 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH IS—INCH STORM DRAIN 129 RK, 150 .003 .012 CIRC 1.5 130 KK SUB 14 RUNOFF FRO`I SUBBASIN 14 131 BA .0008 132 LS 0 95 133 UK 110 .0125 .10 100 134 RK , 1 .003 .012 .0008 CIRC 12 135 KK CON 7 136 KM COMBINE FLOWS FROM SD 8 AND SUB ASIA 14 137 HC 2 138 KM SD 9 139 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH 18—INCH STORM DRAIN 140 RK 65 .003 .012 CIRC 1.5 141 KM SUB 15 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 15 142 BA. .0002 143 LS 0 95 144 UK 80 .0125 .10 100 145 RK 50 .003 .012 .0002 CIRC 1 146 KM COM 8 147 KM COMBINE FLOWS FROM SD 9 AND Su?=BAS a 15 148 HC 2 149 KK SD 10 150 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH 24—INCH STORM DRAIN 151 RK 150 .003 .012 CIRC 2 152 KM SUB 16 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 16 153 BA .0007 154 LS 0 95 155 UK 100 .0125 .10 100 156 RK 80 .003 .012 .0007 CIRC 1 160 LS 98 161 UK 2 , .01 .10 100 162 RK 40 .003 .012 .0008 CIRC 1 163 KK COM 9 164 KM COMBINE FLOWS FROM SD 10, SUBBASIN RI AND SUBBASIN 16 165 HC 3 06-04-1989 16:53:46.41 NEC-1 INPUT PAGE 5 LINE ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 166 KK SD 11 167 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH 24-INCH STORM DRAIN 168 RK 100 .003 .012 CIRC 2 169 KK SUB 17 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 17 170 BA .0004 171 LS 0 95 172 UK 100 .0125 .10 100 173 RK 80 .003 .012 .0007 CISC 1 174 KK SUB 18 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 18 175 BA .0003 176 LS 0 95 177 UK 90 .0125 .10 100 178 RK 1 .003 .012 .0003 CIRC 1 179 KK COM10 180 KM COMBINE FLOWS FROM SD 11, SUBBASIN 17 AND SUBBASIN 18 181 HC 3 182 KK SD 12 183 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH 24-INCH STORM DRAIN 184 AK 75 .003 .012 CIRC • 2 185 KK, 186 KM DIVERT FLOWS FOR FUTURE COiMBiATION WITH COMPUTED FLOWS FROM WEST SIDE187DTDSD12 188 DI 2 4 • 6 8 189 DO 2 4 6 8 190 KK 19 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN9 19 (NORTHWEST CORNERPROPOSEDBUILDING191BA .0007 OF BL+iLDIry 192 LS 0 95 193 i v 1Afl t1104: In IAA 195 KK SD 13 196 KM R---_ FLOWS THROUGH 12-INCH STORM DRAIN 197 RK 90 .003 .012 CIRC • 1 198 KK SUB 20 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 20 199 BA .0002 200 LS 0 95 201 UK 70 .0125 .10 100 202 RK 35 .003 .012 .0002 CIRC 12 203 KK COM11 204 KM COMBINE FLOWS FROM SD 13 ADD SUBBASIN 20 205 HC 2 06-04-1989 16:53:47.73 NEC-1 INPiT PAGE 6 LINE ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 206 KK 5D 14 207 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH 18-INCH STORM DRAIN 208 RK 100 .003 .012 CIRC 1.5 209 KK SUB 21 RUNOFF FROM SUBBASIN 21 210 BA .0002 • 211 LS 0 95 212 UK 50 .0125 .10 100 213 RA 10 .003 .012 .0002 CIRC 12 214 KM CON12 215 KM COMBINE FLOWS FROM SD 14 A`@ SUBBASIN 21 216 HC 2 217 KK 5D 15 218 KM ROUTE FLOWS THROUGH 18-INCH STORM DRAIN 219 RK 160 .003 .012 CIRC 1.5 220 KM SUB R2 221 KM RUNOFF FLOWS FROM WEST HALF OF ROOF 222 BA .0008 223 LS 0 98 224 UK 200 .01 .10 1(0 225 RA 40 .003 .012 .0008 CIRC 1 226 KK- RETRIEVE" COMPUTED FLOWS FROM 5D6 (WEST SIDE OF SITE) 227 DR DSD6 228 KK RETRIEVE" COMPUTED FLOWS FROM SD12 (SOUTH & EAST SIDES & BLDG. ROOF) 232 KM THIS THE WiAL }'LNV UN-J11t i'LU`rf 'aUli Itlt l't(UYUJCU UC'/CLUC iL17i ,av 233 KO 1 2 234 HC 4 235 KK RES 1 236 KM ROUTE HYDROGRAP'H THROUGH DETENTIGM SYSTEM WITH 10 YEAR RELEASE = 1 CFS 237 KO 1 2 238 RS 1 ELEV 12 239 SV 0 .1 .2 .4 .6 .8 1.0 . 240 SE 12 12.5 13 14 15 16 18 241 SO 0 0.5 1 1 I 1 1 242 ZZ SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF STREAM NETWORK INPUT LINE (V) ROUTING DIVERSION OR PUMP FLOW NO.CONNECTOR RETURN OF DIVERTED OR PUMPED FLOW 5 SUB 1 V V 26 SD 1 29 SUB 2 34 COM 1 V V 37 SD 2 40 SUB 3 45 COM2 V V 48 SD 3 51 SUB 5 61 COM 3 V V 64 SD 4 67 SUB 6 72 SUB 7 77 SLAB 8 82 COi14 V V 85 SD 5 83 SUB 9 93 SUB 10 98 SUB 11 103 CeN 5 108 DSD6 106 111 SUB 12 V V 116 SD 7 119 SUB 13 124 CON 6 V V 127 SD 8 130 •SUB 14 135 COM 7 V V 138 SD 9 V 149 SD 10 152 SUB 16 157 SUB R1 163 COM 9 V V 166 SD 11 169 SUB 17 174 SUB 18 179 C0,110 V 182 SD 12 187 DSD12 185 190 13 V V 195 SD 13 198 SUB 20 203 C0M V V 206 SD 14 209 SUB 21 214 C0712 V V 217 SD 15 220 'SUB R2 o 227 DSD6 226 228• 230 COM13 V V 235 RES 1 ( p 1;T NIT I o rl FAG I I--I TY RUNOFF ALSO COMPUTED AT THIS LOCATION FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE NEC-1 (MSDOS VERSION) - JANUARY 1988 DODSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 7015 W TIDWELL, HOUSTON TEXAS 77092, PHONE (713)895-8322 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR FAA BUILDING NEC-1 MODEL (255) -24 HR STORM) FOR DEVELOPED CONDS.-DRAIN TO RAYMOND AVE 4 ID OUTPUT CONTROL VARIABLES IRRNT 5 PRINT CONTROL IPLOT 0 PLOT CONTROL OSCAL 0. HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE IT HYDROGRAPH TIME DATA NMIN 10 MINUTES IN COMPUTATION INTERVAL IDATE 1 0 STARTING DATE 1WAL F - I 1 F 1_O vW To . D ET I.r4T l o t EPIC l kTY I- ). 10130130 100 1-1 5 710140110. . . . ( . . . . ? . i 11 10150 .120 10200 130 10210 140 10220 150 10230 16.0 10240 17.0 10250 18.0 10300 19. 0 10310 20. 0 10320 21 0 10330 22. 0 10340 23. 0 10350 24. 0 10400 25. 0 10410 26. 0 10420 27. 0 10430 28. 0 . 10440 29. 0 . 10450 30. 0 . 10500 31 0 10510 32. 0 . 10520 33. 0 . 10530 34.0 . 10540 35.0 . 10550 36. 0. 10600 37. 0. 10610 38. 0 10620 39. 0 10630 40. I 10640 41 1 10650 42. 10700 43.I 10710 44. 10720 45. 10730 46. 10740 47. 10750 48. 10800 49. I • 10810 50. I 10820 51 10830 52. I . 10840 53. 10850 54. i 10900 55. 0 10910 56. 10920 57. 10930 58. 10940 59. 0 10950 60. 0 11000 61 0 11010 62. 0 11020 63. 0 11030 64. 0 11040 65. 0 11050 66. 0 11100 67. 0 11110 68. 0 11120 69. 0. 11130 70. 0. 11140 71 0 11150 72. 0. v i4f44Ef4E4**4**444E**44*E4444E4E4*4*4E**iE*4444*4*Eif44f*E444E4ff4fEfEEf11M1E#f4f**#**EffififfifEf##ifi#f*Eff#f*Efif#ffE#Ef#E#EE# HYDROGRAPH AT STATION RES 1 if**ff4*****44f4*ffffE*4***E4*44f4ff4444**4*444Ef4f4fff*44444*44411 f44fff**4*f*4**Efi*4Ef*4i,4fffiff**if**4f**4f*4f*fl4fffEfi*4fff4f • j DA MON HRMN ORD OUTFLOW STORAGE STAGE 4 DA MOH HRMN ORD OUTFLOW STORAGE STAGE *DA MON HEMN ORD OUTFLOW STORAGE STAGE 1 0000 1 0. .0 12.0 4 1 1110 68 1. .4 14.1 * 1 2220 135 1. .1 12.7 i 1 0010 2 0. .0 12.0 I 1 1120 69 1. .4 14.1 4 1 2230 136 1. .1 12.7 1 0020 3 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1130 70 1. .4 14.1 * 1 2240 137 1. .1 12.7 1 0030 4 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1140 71 1. .4 14.1 * 1 2250 138 1. .1 12.7 1 0040 5 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1150 72 1. .4 14.1 * 1 2300 139 1. .1 12.7 1 0050 6 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1200 73 1. .4 14.1 * 1 2310 140 1. .1 12.7 0 1 0100 7 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1210 74 1. .4 14.1 * 1 2320 141 1. .1 12.6 1 0110 8 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1220 75 1. .4 14.1 * 1 2330 142 1. .1 12.6 1 0120 9 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1230 76 1. .4 14.1 * 1 2340 143 1. .1 12.6 e 1 ' 0130 10 0. .0 12.0 f 1 1240 77 1. .4 14.1 * 1 2350 144 1. .1 12.6 1 0140 11 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1250 78 1. .4 14.1 * 2 0000 145 1. .1 12.6 1 0150 12 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1300 79 1. .4 14.0 * 2 0010 146 1. .1 12.6 1 0200 13 0. .0 12.0 1 1 1310 80 1. .4 14.0 * 2 0020 147 1. .1 12.6 1 0210 14 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1320 81 1. .4 14.0 * 2 0030 148 1. .1 12.6 1 0220 15 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1330 82 1. .4 14.0 * 2 0040 149 1. .1 12.5 I 1 0230 16 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1340 83 1. .4 14.0 * 2 0050 150 1. .1 12.5 1. 0240 17 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1350 84 1. .4 14.0 * 2 0100 151 0. .1 12.5 1 0250 18 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1400 85 1. .4 13.9 * 2 0110 152 0. .1 12.4 1 0300 19 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1410 86 1. .4 13.9 * 2 0120 153 0. .1 12.4 1 0310 20 0. .0 12.0 * 1 1420 87 1. .4 13.9 * 2 0130 154 0. .1 12.4 I 1 0320 21 0. .0 12.1 * 1 1430 88 1. .4 13.9 * 2 0140 155 0. .1 12.4 1 0330 22 0. .0 12.1 * 1 1440 89 1. .4 13.9 * 2 0150 156 0. .1 12.3 I 1 0340 23 0. .0 12.1 * 1 1450 90 1. .4 13.9 f 2 0200 157 0. .1 12.3 ' 1 0350 24 0. .0 12.1 * 1 1500 91 1. .4 13.8 f 2 0210 158 0. .1 12.3 1 0400 25 0. .0 12.1 * 1 1510 92 1. .4 13.8 * 2 0220 159 0. .1 12.3 I 041E 2u 0. .0 12.1 * 1 15220 93 1. .4 13.8 * 2 0230 160 0. .1 12.3 - 1 0420 27 0. .0 12.2 * 1 1530 94 1. .4 13.8 * 2 0240 161 0. .1 12.3 1 0430 28 0. .0 12.2 * 1 1540 95 1. .3 13.7 * 2 0250 I62 . 0. .0 12.2 1 0440 29 0. .0 12.2 * 1 1550 36 1. .3 13.7 * 2 0300 163 0. .0 12.2 1 0450 30 0. .0 12.2 * 1 1600 97 1. .3 13.7 f 2 0310 164 0. .0 12.2 i . 1 0500 31 0. .1 12.3 * 1 1610 98 1. .3 13.7 * 2 0320 165 0. .0 12.2 1 0510 32 0. .1 12.3 * 1 1620 99 1. .3 13.7 * 2 0330 166 0. .0 12.2 j 1 0520 33 0. .1 12.3 * 1 1630 100 1. .3 13.6 * 2 0340 167 0. .0 12.2 0 1 0530 34 0. ..1 12.4 * 1 1640 101 1. .3 13.6 * 2 0350 168 0. .0 12.2 1 0540 35 0. .1 12.4 * 1 1650 102 1. .3 13.6 * 2 0400 169 0. .0 12.1. 0 i 1 0550 36 0. .1 12.4 4 1 1700 103 1. .3 13.6 * 2 0410 170 0. .0 12.1 1 0600 37 0. .1 12.5 * 1 1710 104 1. .3 13.5 I 2 0420 171 0. .0 12.1 1 0610 38 0. .1 12.5 * 1 1720 105 1. .3 13.5 * 2 0430 172 0. .0 12.1 1 0620 33 1. .1 12.5 * 1 1730 106 1. .3 13.5 * 2 0440 173 0. .0 12.1 1 0630 40 1. .1 12.6 * 1 1740 107 1. .3 13.4 * 2 0450 174 0. .0 12.1 1 0640 41 1. .1 12.6 * 1 1750 108 1. .3 13.4 * 2 0500 175 0. .0 12.1 1 0650 42 1. .1 12.6 * 1 1800 109 1. .3 13.4 * 2 0510 176 0. .0 12.1 I 1 0700 43 1. .1 12.7 * 1 1810 110 1. .3 13.3 * 2 0520 177 0. .0 12.1 1 0710 44 1. .1 12.7 * 1 1820 111 1. .3 13.3 4 2 0530 178 0. .0 12.1 1 0720 45 1. .2 12.8 * 1 1830 112 1. .3 13.3 4 2 0540 179 0. .0 12.1 4; O 1 0730 46 1+ .2 12.9 * 1 1840 113 1. .2 13.2 * 2 0550 180 . 0. .0 12.1 1 0740 47 1. .2 13.0 * 1 1850 114 1. .2 13.2 * 2 0600 181 0. .0 12.1 a ' I 1 0750 48 - 1. .2 13.2 * 1 • 1900 115 1. .2 13.2 * 2 0610 182 0: .0 12.1 IP t;.'.i 1 0800 49 1. .3 13.5 * 1 1910 116 1. .2 13.1 * 2 0620 183 0. .0 12.1 1 0810 50 1.3 13.7 * 1 1920 117 1. .2 13.1 * 2 0630 184 0. .0 12.1 r; 1 0820 51 1. .4* 13.8 * 1 1930 118 1. .2 13.1 * 2 0640 185 0. .0 12.1 1 0830 52 1. .4 13.9 4 1 1940 119 1. .2 13.0 * 2 0650 186 0. .0 12.0 1 0840 53 1. .4 13.9 * 1 1950 120 1. .2 13.0 * 2 0700 187 0. .0 12.0 K I 1 0850 54 1. .4 14.0 * 1 2000 121 1. .2 13.0 * 2 0710 188 0. .0 12.0 4-'•; 1 0900 55 1. .4 14.0 * 1 2010 122 1. .2 12.9 * 2 0720 183 0. .0 12.0 1.1 1 0910 56 1. .4 14.0 * 1 2020 123 1. .2 12.9 * 2 0730 110 0. • .0 12.0 1 0320 57 1. .4 14.0 * 1 2030 124 1. .2 12.9 * 2 0740 191 0. .0 12.0 1 0930 58 1. .4 14.0 * 1 2040 125 1. .2 12.9 * 2 0750 192 • 0. .0 12.0 1 0940 59 1. .4 14.0 * 1 2050 126 1. .2 12.8 * 2 0800 193 0. .0 12.0. 1 0950 60 1. .4 14.0 * 1 2100 127 1. .2 12.8 * 2 0810 194 0. .0' 12.0 I `.. I 1 1000. 61 .1. .4 14.1 * 1 2110 128 1. .2 12.8 * 2 0820 195 0.. .0 12.0 1 1010 62 1. .4 14.1 * 1 2120 129 1. .2 12.8 * 2 0830 196 0. .0 12.0 1 .1420 63 1. .4 14.1 4 1 2130 130 1. .2 12.8 * 2' 0840 197 0. .0 12.0 I 1 1030 64 1. .4 14.1 * 1 2140 131 1. .2 12.8 * 2 0850 198 0. .0 12.0 X'`' 1 1040 65 1. .4 14.1 * 1 2150 132 1. .1 12.7 * 2 0900 193 0. .0 12.0 O 1 1050 66 1. .4 14.1 * 1 22001 1334 1. .l 12.7 * 2 0910 200 0. .0 12.0 1 I100 67 1.4rr 14.1 4 220 13 1 12. G'.I aJ IYC-CI n I_Te rf1i._v__ r1 n rn mFa - r I "Yr . 516 1-14-, TIME IN HOURS, AREA IN SQUARE MILES PEAK TIME OF AVERAGE FLOW FOR MAXIMUM PERIO., - BASIN MAXIMUM TIME OF OPERATION STATION FLOW PEAK 6-HOUR 24-HOUR 72-HOUR AREA STAGE MAX STAGE HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 1 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 ROUTED TO SD 1 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 2 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 2 COMBINED AT COM 1 1. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 ROUTED TO SD 2 1. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 3 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 2 COMBINED AT CON 2 1. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 ROUTED TO SD 3 1. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 5 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 4 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 3 COMBINED AT CON 3 1. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 ROUTED TO SD 4 1. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 6 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 7 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 8 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 4 COMBINED AT COM 4 2. 7.83 1. 0. 0. 00 ROUTED TO SD 5 2. 7.83 1. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 9 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 10 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 11 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 4 COMBINED AT COM 5 3. 7.83 1. 0. 0. 01 DIVERSION TO DSD6 3. .17 1. 0. 0. 01 HYDROGRAPH AT 0. .17 0. 0. 0. 01 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 12 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 ROUTED TO SD 7 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 13 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 40 2 COMBINED AT COM 6 1. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 ROUTED TO SD 8 1. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 14 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 2 COMBINED AT COM 7 1. 7.83 0. 0.00 ROUTED TO SD 9 1. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 15 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 2 COMBINED AT COM 8 1. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 ROUTED TO SD 10 1. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 16 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB RI 0. 8.00 0. 0. 0. 00 3 COMBINED AT COM 9 2. 7.83 1. 0. 0. 00 ROUTED TO SD 11 2. 7.83 1. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 17 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 NYDROGRAPH AT SUB 18 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 3 COMBINED AT COMIO 2. 7.83 1. 0. 0. 00 ROUTED TO SD 12 2. 7.83 1. 0. 0. 00 DIVERSION TO DSD12 2. .17 1. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT 0. .17 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT 19 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 ROUTED TO SD 13 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 20 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 2 COMBINED AT COM11 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 ROUTED TO SD 14 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB 21 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 2 COiMBINED AT COM12 1. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 ROUTED TO SD 15 0. 7.83 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT SUB R2 0. 8.00 0. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT 7.83 1. 0. 0. 00 HYDROGRAPH AT 2. 7.83 1. 0. 0. 00 4 COMBINED AT COM13 6. ' 7.83 2. 1. 1. 00 ROUTED TO RES 1 1.( Z) 7.83 I. 1. 1. 00 14.10 11.00 1 ) Pe_aie-. i iif to u., To c.0-,-,t o I S-tt-u J-0 1'e_ NORMAL END OF NEC-1 *** (2..) A PUGET POWER S.CENTRAL DIV OFFICE P.01 PUGET POWER June 2, 19895 1989 Mr. Robert Snyder The Austin Company 800 SW 16th St. Renton, Wa. 98055 Dear Mr. Snyder: Per our Conversation regarding the Earlington Distribution Sub-station, the station has an incoming voltage of 115 , 000 volts . The serving voltage from the station is 12, 470 volts . Puget Power has no concern with the new building located next to the sub-station. Please call if you have any questions . Sincerely, Don Rushing Customer SErvice Engineer DR:nja The Energy Starts Here Puget Sound Power&Light Company 620 South Grady Way P.O. Box 329 Renton,WA 98057-0329 (206) 255-2464 4i A CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION May 30, 1989 Mr. Robert G. Snyder The Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, Washington 98055 RE: GSA/FAA Building S.W. 27th & Lind Avenue ECF; SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Snyder: I am responding to your letter of May 23, 1989 requesting more information concerning the Technical Advisory Committee's recommendations relating to parking, landscaping and recreation space requirements for the above-referenced project. Your questions and my responses are delineated below. 1./2. What is the basis for the determination of the number of spaces to be constructed (677) and the number of spaces to be held in reserve (146). Section 4-2208 of the Parking and Loading Ordinance (attached) establishes basic parking requirements for land uses (Sections 2.B, 3.B, and 10), and criteria for placing parking in reserve (Section 12). Section 12 of the Ordinance allows a delay in installation of up to fifty percent (50%) of required parking. Staff is recommending a delay in the installation of approximately twenty percent (20%) of.parking required for the combined proposed office/warehouse development. Staff believe that 677 spaces should be sufficient to serve employees, in combination with various Traffic System Management programs recommended by the Technical Advisory Committee (e.g. public transit information centers, transit rider passes, carpool and van pool services). Reduction in the number of cars accommodated on site will serve to reduce traffic impacts to nearby rights-of-way, a number of which are experiencing limited levels of service at present and will also provide opportunities for more landscaping and recreation space on the site. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Mr. Robert G. Snyder t,. May 30, 1989 Page 2 3. Please provide more definitive explanation'of the term "held in reserve". Section 4-2208 (12) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance describes criteria for reserved parking. The Environmental Review Committee is responsible for evaluation and determination of the need to develop parking held in reserve, and will do so,based upon documentation on the part of the applicant that such release is warranted. Environmental review and/or site plan review may be required to release parking held in reserve, or the release may be accomplished by administrative review by the Planning Division. The Zoning Administrator will make a decision as to the appropriate system for releasing reserved parking based upon proven need and proof that an effective Traffic management Plan is in place. The specific uses allowed in the space held in reserve for parking could include recreation areas or supplemental landscaping. Required landscaping cannot be placed in the reserved area. City officials are responsible for determining the type and duration of specific uses in the reserve area. Section 4-2208 (12) establishes criteria for development of reserve areas into parking areas. If you have additional questions or concerns, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, 14u-ti J Lenora Blauman Project Manager Attachment fir; D 6,"))0 U.S. Department Northwest-Mountain Region 17900 Pacific Highway South of Transportation Colorado,Idaho,Montana, C-68966 Oregon,Utah,Washington, Seattle,Washington 98168 Federal Aviation Wyoming Administration Wks! . . 1E 4 J Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Kaufman: You are invited to join us for the groundbreaking of our new Seattle FAA Consolidated Office building on Thursday June 1, 1989. Please join us at Southwest 16th Street and Lind Avenue Southwest in Renton at 2 p.m. -- directions to the site are enclosed. Please let us know if you will be able to attend by calling (206) 431- 2005 before 4 p.m. on Tuesday May 30. We look forward to seeing you. Sincerely, Frederick M. Isaac Regional Administrator Enclosure a THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. RENTON, WA 98055 OM NYPA PHONE: 206/226-8800COMPANY11 TELECOPIER: 206/228-5471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223-01 AU-ST-IC-T377N3 May 23, 1989 PLANNING MOO CITY OF RENTON Ms. Lenora Blauman Q MAY 2 4 1989 r Senior Planner City of Renton r r !r (tLji200MillAvenueSouth Renton, Washington 98055 Reference: GSA/FAA Office Building ECF-5A-030-89 Austin W.O. Number 89-5477D Dear Ms. Blauman: In order to respond to the Technical Advisory Committee's comments, we need further clarification of Item 1 Parking: 1. What is the basis for the determination of the number of spaces to be constructed (677)? 2. What is the basis for the determination of the spaces "held in reserve", (146)? 3. Please provide more definitive explanation of the term "held in reserve." a. Is the building official responsible for evaluation and determination of need to release spaces from the "reserve status"? b. What is the procedure and what are the guidelines utilized in determination to release the parking "held in reserve"? c. What is the "specific use" for the space "held in reserve for parking"? Can it be utilized as recreational areas or counted as required landscaping? d. Who is responsible for determining this "specific use" and its duration? Ms. Lenora Blauman Page 2 May 23, 1989 e. What regulation guarantees that these areas held in reserve can be developed into the required spaces set forth by City of Renton "Parking and Loading Ordinance"? Very truly yours, Robert G. Sn er Project Coordinator RGS/ddl EaTHE AUSTIN BOO SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. RENTON, WA 96055 COMPANY PHONE: 206/226-8800 TELECOPIER: 206/228-5471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223-01 AU-ST-IC-T377N3 F ;7'S IRO DIVISION May 23, 1989 Off"(OF RENTON Ms. Lenore Blauman MAY 2 4 1989 [I)Senior Planner pi npCityofRentonl5U 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Reference: GSA/FAA. Office Building- ECF-5A-030-89 Austin W.O. Number 89-5477D Dear Ms. Blauman: As per our conversation, The Austin Company will not be able to respond the comments of the Technical Advisory Committee at this time. Please withdraw the project from the May 24, 1989, Environmental Review Committee Review and schedule us for •the next available date. Please notify me' of this date as soon as possible so we can ensure our response to the comments is received in adequate time. If you need any additional information, please contact me. Ver truly yours, Airt%81. Robert G. Sny er Project Coordinator . RGS/ddl 1 EaTHE AUSTIN COMPANY N,- .. 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST., RENTON. WA 98055 Mu.3.PuJiMbit. r * K 223-01 AU-ST-IGT377N3 MAY23'89 • ;% IK 5477 c 0 i• K u-o92429 K Ms. Lenora Blauman Senior Planner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 I. I i 11:: -1 1 1 4 Iil 1 '1 I-1• i I 4$ 0 CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor MEMORANDUM DATE: May 23 , 1989 TO: ERC Members: Ken Nyberg Larry Springer Ron Nelson Lynn Guttmann Mike Parness Glen Gordon FROM: Don Erickson SUBJ: Cancellation of 5-24-89 ERC Meeting f I The applicant for the Austin Company, Bob Snyder, called this morning to inform us that they would like to change their project before it is reviewed by the Committee. As you recall, this is the application for the GSA/FAA Office Building. Mr. Snyder indicated that they will resubmit in a couple of weeks. Therefore, at the applicant's request, this item is being deferred for several weeks. Please be advised that the Wednesday, May 24th, ERC meeting has been cancelled inasmuch as the only new project on the agenda was the GSA/FAA Office Building. The next ERC meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 31st. A number of projects have been scheduled for this meeting. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 I ' d 2_2 : 9 1 Re 67,/50... IS I Q MN N 11S1l' NO d ETh1THEAUSTIN800su4TwwEST ,era 51' RENTOµ: wA 9aasa COMPANY PHONg; zQa,z.zB•agibb TELEX 910.422,08132 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • ®LIIi,,.ERS 223-01 Au•ST•le rj77N3 FAX TRANSMITTAL Date:44 1 j9' Tina; +; I ._ Charge:: ,81 47-._! . TO:, Lt 1L .0 zowskie,4 Devi% clAitatkArr PLAAJAlioxi CITY: C4T1 OP 1144400 FAX #: ( ' „'1 Phone # ( 4" 0 No. of Pages: 4' Including Cover Sheet) COMMENTS: RAP R-41A-Y 1989 E SPECIAL INSrEUCTICUS: LI st ® strict E ' d LE :9 I 68/BE/SO LS I G MN NI I ldl ld NOdrThTHEAUSTIN44SO4THW16:w ST RdNTON.N. WA 99065 COMPANY PHONE: 206/226•4$00 TELECORIER: 20S/226.3471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEKRS • BUILDERS z23.41 AU•ST•1C.T377N3 May 23, 1989 Ms. Lenore Blauman Senior Planner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Reference: GSA/FAA Office Building ECF-5A-030-89 Austin W.O. Number 89-54770 Dear Ms. Blauman: As per our conversation, The Austin Company will not be able to respond the comments of the Technical Advisory Committee at this time. Please withdraw', the project from the May 24, 1989, Environmental Review Committee Review and schedule us for the next available date. Please notify me of this date as soon as possible so we can ensure our response to the comments is received in adequate time. If you reed any additional information, please contact me. Ver truly yours, r Robert G. Sny erg' c® 1/i 611if Project Coordinator pi9 j o,Q ay o47 RGS/ddl e e 3 . 498 d SE :9I 68/ES/'9O SIC MN N I isms NO'dd E n THE AUSTIN A00 501.1THWIMT 16TH ST, RLNTON. WA Se045 COMPANY PMONE: 20e/22e•9ttoO r TE4ECOPIER; 20G/229.5471 ARCHITECTS• ENGINEERS• BUILDERS 223.01 AU•ST.i0.T377N'$ May 23, 1989 1 i) r1,1 . ft - Ms. Lenora Blauman Senior Planner 1l -4.9 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South s' i/2Renton, Washington 98055 Reference: GSA/FAA Office Building ECF-5A-030-89 Austin W.O. Number 89-54770 Dear Ms. Blauman: In order to respond to the Technical Advisory Committee's comments, we need further clarification of Item I Parking: I. What is the basis for the determination of the number of spaces to be constructed (677)? 2. What is the basis for the determination of the spaces "held in reserve" , (146)? 3. Please provide more definitive explanation of the term "held in reserve." a. Is the building official responsible for evaluation and determination of need to release spaces from the "reserve status"? b. What is the procedure and what are the guidelines utilized in determination to release the parking "held in reserve"? c. What is the "specific use" for the space "held in reserve for parking"? Can it be utilized as recreational areas or counted as required landscaping? d. Who is responsible for determining this "specific use" and its duration? d 11±1.O1 d i 9 i SB/EE/SO IS I G MN N I lSlib WOdd Ms. Lenora Blauman Page 2 May 23, 1989 e. What regulation guarantees that these„areas held in reserve can rebedevelopedintothe uirgd snag set forth by City of Renton "Parking and Loading Ordinance ? Very truly yours, Robert G. Sn er Project Coordinator RGS/ddl i 0 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION May 18, 1989 Robert G. Snyder The Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 RE: GSA/FAA Office Building 1601 Lind Avenue SW ECF; SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Snyder: I am writing to confirm our conversations of May 12, 1989 and of May 17, 1989, concerning requirements for evaluation and processing of the above-referenced project. As we have discussed, the Technical Advisory Committee reviewed this project on May 10, 1989 - at that meeting, Committee members agreed that it would be necessary to have additional information and revised materials in order to make an environmental determination for this project. Also, as we have discussed on May 12th and May 17th, the Technical Advisory Committee requested the following specific materials at this time: 1.That the applicant provide a revised site plan, including: a) 677 parking spaces with 146 parking spaces held in reserve); b) a plan for on-site recreation areas picnic areas, congregate areas, walking trails); c) on-site exterior lighting at pedestrian-scale sufficient to illuminate the office structure, parking area, landscaped areas, recreation areas, and site periphery; and d) pedestrian pathways to link structure with parking and recreation areas and with the adjacent right- of-way). Note: Revisions are also recommended in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts and recreational impacts by creating a more attractive, "user friendly" site. These revisions are also intended to provide a development which is safe and which functions efficiently and effectively. Staff recommend that the revised site plan be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 2.That the applicant provide a revised landscape plan which increases the amount of landscaped area on the site and improves the size, number and diversity of plantings to address aesthetic impacts, light and glare impacts (such as glare off of parked cars), and to provide additional permeable surfaces for storm drainage management. The landscape plan should be subject to approval by the City's Landscape Planner. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Robert G. Snyder GSA/FAA Office Building May 18, 1989 Page 2 3.That the applicant be required to provide a plan for traffic management, subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division, including, but not limited to: a.Assessment for Burlington Industrial Park Benefit Zone. $537,865.16 Transportation Benefit Zone Assessment Fee. 2,730 trips generated at 197.00. b.Building required to have a commuter information center. Also preferential parking space is to be assigned to multi-occupant vehicles and van pool uses. c.Developer to work with Metro to provide a bus shelter on the West side of Lind Ave. SW nearest to site. d.Driveway width to be 30'. e.Existing street light in proposed driveway off Lind Ave. SW to be relocated by a City approved lighting contractor not just removed as shown on plan. f.Provide for street lighting on SW 16th St. Plans to be coordinated with City proposed street improvements on SW 16th St. Submit drawings for approval. g.SW 16th St. - Lind Ave. SW to Raymond Ave. SW overhead power distribution conductors below 55KV to be undergrounded and placed under or behind the sidewalk. The developer will need to provide forandmakethosearrangementswithPugetSoundPower & Light Company. h. Lind Ave. SW - a right turn deceleration lane needs to be provided for driveway approach. Submittal of design plans required. i.Provide for channelization of a center lane two way left turn at the driveway entrance off Lind Ave. SW. Channelization plans to be submitted. j.SW 16th St. - Provide vehicle turn-out in front of building for drop-offofpassengersonSW16thST. Show plan on drawing. 4.That the applicant provide: a) information from Puget Power describing the type and quantity of power generated at the substation; b) information from the U.S. Department of Energy indicating the safe distance between the substation and the proposed development; and c) a revised site plan (if necessary) locating theproposeddevelopmentatasafedistancefromthesubstation. Robert G. Snyder GSA/FAA Office Building May 18, 1989 Page 3 5.That the applicant be required to provide a plan for construction, including: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles prior to their leaving the site to control dust and debris; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust and debris; d) a plan for hauling routes and hauling hours to mitigate traffic impacts; and e) a bond of $3,000.00 for street clean-up. These plans should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Police Department, and the Planning Division. At the time of site plan/building plan review, the City will require: 1.That the applicant be required to provide a plan for storm drainage management which includes: a) a drainage system with a 25 year storm peak flow capacity ; and b) a water quality protection system with baffled oil/water separators and biofiltration prior to the off-site release of any storm drainage. This plan should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department. 2.a. That the applicant be required to provide a flood control management system which includes a plan for: a) siting of the structure at a location on the property and at an elevation which would ensure protection of that structure and an emergency vehicle parking area during a 100 year flood; and b) a landscaping system which is designed to enhance erosion/flood control management (e.g.berms, plantings which cover and protect soil, etc.). This plan should be subject to approval by the City's Storm Water Utility Engineering Division. AND 2.b. That the applicant shall provide a document which acknowledges that the City has informed them that the subject property is located in an area which may be included in an altered 100 year flood plain (assuming the P-1 Channel is not developed), and that the applicant has decided to proceed, at it's own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any floodingand/or for any damage to property or person arising from such flooding. This agreement should be subject to approval by the City Attorney. AND 2.c. That the applicant be required to develop a containment program for ensuring that materials now (or in the future) stored on site are not allowed to contaminate the underlying terrain in the event of flooding, in order to protect wetland areas in the vicinity of the site. This plan should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department. Note: The site is not currently in the 100 year flood plain, but that plain may change from current FEMA levels depending on drainage alternatives now being considered by the City, such as the P-I channel project). Note: See 5/4/89 Memo from Storm Water Utility Engineering for specifications. Robert G. Snyder GSA/FAA Office Building May 18, 1989 Page 4 At our conference on May 12, 1989, you reviewed the Technical Advisory report, and we discussed the report content. At the conclusion of our conference, you informed me that you would be submitting those currently requested materials by May 16th at 5:00 p.m. in order to expedite continuing review by the Technical Advisory Committee and review by the Environmental Review Committee on May 17, 1989. On May 12th I also requested additional information concerning your plans to fill and grade on this site. On May 16th you submitted only grade and fill plans. None of the other materials requested by the Technical Advisory Committee had been submitted. On May 17th, in our initial telephone conversation, you indicated that your contract with GSA would preclude your providing revised plans for parking, recreation andlandscaping. As I advised at that time, you will need to provide us with a letter stating that you will not be complying with the requests of the Technical Advisory Committee and that you wish review to proceed based upon plans currently on file with the City. In our second conversation on May 17, 1989, you asked about the ramifications of requesting that the Technical Advisory Committee pursue review of the existing materials as opposed to ramifications of requesting review based upon revised materials. I advised you that there is substantial likelihood that the Technical Advisory Committee would recommend to the Environmental Review Committee that a Determination of Significance be issued for the project (as it has been submitted), as a result of the concerns described in the attached Technical Advisory Committee report of May 10,1989. A Determination of Significance would trigger a requirement for an Environmental Impact Statement, which would result in a four to six month delay in theconstructionofthisproposeddevelopment. Section 197-11-360(4) does state that "If at any time after the issuance of a DS a proposal is changed so, in the judgement of the lead agency, there are no probable significant adverse environmental impacts, the DS shall be withdrawn and a DNS issued instead. The DNS shall be sent to all who commented on the DS. A proposal shall not be considered changed until all license applications for the proposal are revised to conform to the changes or other binding commitments made by agencies or applicants.". If you comply with the Technical Advisory Committee's request for revised information, there is a greater possibility that the Environmental Review Committee will be able to issue a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated, for this proposed project. This would facilitate construction following the development of acceptable environmental mitigation plans, site plans, andbuildingplans. As I have informed you in all of our discussions, the Technical Advisory Committee and the Environmental Review Committee will expedite their review of your application upon receipt of a letter indicating that you wish continuing review of the existingmaterialsoruponreceiptofnewmaterials. We await your direction. Robert G. Snyder GSA/FAA Office Building May 18, 1989 Page 5 If you have any questions, please contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Xe.L-triAJ 44-411 (45-7•-) Lenora Blauman Project Manager LB:mjp Attachment CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WA 98055 206-235-2501 FAX# 235-2513 DATE9 PAGES (EXCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET) ATTENTION: S '7 a(/ol FROM: D i,Za g-a(4i,4 OtL ' THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. RENTON, WA 98055 COMPANY PHONE: 206/226-8800 TELECOPIER: 206/228-5471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223-01 AU-ST-IC-T377N3 May 16, 1989 Ms. Lenora Bl auman PLANNING MOM,Senior Planner OiTYOFRENTONCityofRenton 200 Mill Avenue S. MAY. 1 6 1989Renton, Washington 98055 2 CSubject: GSA/FAA Office Building ECF : SA-030-89 Dear Ms. Blauman : In response to your request for information concerning the site preparationanderosioncontrolplansfor, the above project, I 've attached a PMT of our plan. Our soils engineers, Dames & Moore, have recommended a surcharge program be implemented on the building site to reduce differential settling and improve the structural integrity of the building. Our intent is to place a pre-loadofapproximately4' in height over the building pad area for a duration of 4-6 weeks. This will require approximately 7,259 c.y. of fill material . Thisfillmaterialforthepre-load will be site oriented fill material . No imported fill material will be required to accomplish the pre-load. Our consultant also recommends the stripping of the upper 6" to 9" of the site to remove vegetation and superficial organic soil layer. After this has been accomplished, proofing-rolling will be utilized to identify soft or loose areas. These areas will be over excavated to firm bearing (2 ft. max. ) and replaced with properly compacted fill . The fill material for this portion ofthesiteworkwillbeplacedin8" layers and compacted to 95% dry density according to ASTM D1557. Approximately 15,000 c.y. of fill material will be required for this segment of work. All material to be used as fill will be clean well-graded material with less than about 5% fines. The source of the fill material will be an approved barrow pit to be determined by successfulbidder. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Very truly y urs fir Robert G. Snyder Project Co-ordinator RGS:bp 4i Q CITY OF RENTON LL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division MEMORANDUM Date: May 12, 1989 To: Don Erickson Lenora Blauman From: Clint Morgan Subject: The Austin Company GSA/FAA Office Building Please amend the Plan Review Comments on the above referenced proposed development as follows: 1. Revise Plans review item No. 6 to read as follows: SW 16th St. - Lind Ave. SW to Raymond Ave. SW overhead power distribution conductors below 55KV to be undergrounded and placed under or behind the sidewalk. The developer will need to provide for and make those arrangements with Puget Sound Power & Light Company. Remove reference to-future street light conduit. 2 . Provide for channelization of a center lane two way left turn lane at the driveway entrance off Lind Ave. SW. Channelization plans to be submitted. 3 . Provide for street lighting on SW 16th St. Plans to be coordinated with City proposed street improvements on SW 16th St. Submit drawing for approval. 4 . SW 16th St. - Provide vehicle turn-out in front of building for drop-off of passengers on SW 16th St. Show plan on drawing. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 CEM/pf CEM093 ti ® CITY OF RENTON LL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division ME M OR A. N DU M CITY OF FtE!N ON NAY J. 6 1989 DATE: May 16, 1989 C E Q E TO: Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator fora Blauman, Senior Planner FROM: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: The Austin Company GSA/FAA Office Building SA 030-89 Please enter a copy of the attached letter in regard to combining driveways into application file SA 030-89 as a condition of development. CEM:ad Attachment CEM096 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 k ivs 4 10 0 CITY OF RENTON 1/44 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division May 16, 1989 Mr. Robert G. Snyder Project Coordinator The Austin Company 800 SW 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 Subject: GSA/FAA Office Building 1601 Lind Ave. SW Dear Mr. Snyder: The amount of increase in traffic projected for your driveway on Lind Ave. SW shows a need to combine your existing driveway with the new proposed driveway for the GSA/FAA Building. The combining of the two driveways into one will reduce the turning movement conflicts significantly at the driveway entrance. This request will be entered into the application file for the proposed development. Very truly yours, a- )14-" Gary A. Norris, P.E. Traffic Engineer CEM:ad cc: kegora Blauman Application File SA 030-89 CEM095 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 Facsimile 1206) 235-2513 3 a, ' ye qf' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT May 10 , 1989 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Austin Company PROJECT: GSA/FAA Building ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF;SA 030-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199,000 square foot (177,000 square feet of leasable space) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street a 3 II J i I 11f1 ~ Jrl HOLMES ELECTRIC I + I W f i I I SEATTLE LUIeER_--- I---j l 1 I_ 1 S l4JW IZ1-"mom,N S* 16TH yTREYTtr a •Ir f'a•1 g r'o rg}y te.0!n.11 n.m r 1_ ._ i(1'-..... _....__—._.__LC.JU--- 11 1.. - 1 i Ln emu, 11.0111 a 1l4lTr IlT--- 1 -!7511----a sr tf:e• q•aul[n7ei1rrrat.1 may I :T$' T. % — , --- - j- w int.ni'— r r-- /— 1t I \ 1 • TAi Q kZL f .oCE LL9 I r_r n.Qr y • y OFF 1.Ei BUILDING n. / UP' BOE I NOu111 I : -a.. tir ....is,2/ ;t'~I' / ,\ . i Tqw coMPUTE 1 1 `\L t1 -:>!f1\r( eems. b 1 Iw I . T7 SERVICE 1 a 1Ir' 11 Z>9. I`4..19 n ee i 1 I M / I 1•••• totoI I '"7) 117 7) I l`. y 1.4 `: a II , !./ `\ra l/I 1.''... ^. 1111.0 1.11\- ..--.• - ,_ r , I 1. ALA f I J 1 70 UldQ J'a3-- "j Mt 1] -•IP...il•. 7 • nw171 I ROSION CONTROL NOT l'7 -- ' r tJl.lIES: VALLEY OFFICE PARK rJasJgli¢ii aP 14 o r H1•:"r 1 rrfD1•ry•+r..'HaOrq lgl•YObp 1 , IL. r i••a ....4Y,r.1'er in.r,w candy ..FF•,+•:1 1rp fK.ID rn• ..n• ann 170 (1.111A1 I 1IYfa....1 D.Iruw..\.Karl. 1•I w 1Dpr1••••111 Y•,V A 4u•,Kr1 aT• K).r.•1'K,A:r.0111r K rp...r•A;[I•P '• ,n 'A 14 d MY>rr.1.1••7 i i i•11 [N r.'1'i+l•1'I•'•.-.•1.IM ioD:: ,it•1%14:J rlrl Iw11rK • 11r1.tPAR.,r r• :: ....Vn. K1nr all'}IiII r,•..D.••.vr gj 1K .11+.1• •-'l.ur.s•VNi..... --1ri. 1.1 i i''ARIIIV.A.Z :14;;V iditi .M•il II.Y'v11 r•.YTta11t1111r1'ir rllria lr II N I.:•fI.+NY••f,•1H;+1...-,mr.0 V wlr..rr•..•r1. It,— :.w i ••1 II741 D. •i.Kn;. r w.la:',11NwID.O •- li\11.,1w.Ki •rrarl,,,:` , ',t,.,l.l,.,., t w e1.l aK i1,P 10iMl.r..r•f({Ir 11\4K••i}„'r lO.l.eu e,llli 1 1 1,r1M•I, 1.'.+filt•1•i.7•. 1•r4T1 i•'li.,K.rtr r1.:N.1 1 ..••.rM A•. •P Ir•rr1.C.1...rbl... v- iue cJ 5 l Prr /;>RENT0N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Dt.L nRTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST fr '' .REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I r ni 4, J c DATE CIRCULATED: 4-18-89 COMMENTS DUE: 5-3-89 iy PLANNING DIVISION 9 ECF 030-89 CITY OF RENTON cs D APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 030-89 APR 1 8 1989 01PROPONENT: The Austin Company J r) 11 VLI PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build afivestory (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in tOfficeParkZone. (Note: Applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; stahasadvisedthatthisnumberofspacesisinexcessofCoderequirements, a that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number ospaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the projectwiththeexcessnumberofspacesretainedforthepresent. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . SITE AREA 8 . 8 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 199, 000 s. f. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2 . Air 3 . Water o 4 . Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7 . Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics o 11. Light & Glare o O 12 . Recreation 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 14 . Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: p4A1:JId_e_ __G: ,/1.c C . Go11 L' `, i -L am. t 2ze jJ yL_ 6e-e:Lie:tf--c-a---/--i-- --7---g7-e - 9-ere---e,--e---4.:-ei >4.-2.e,---ee---g-z-,-,----i.--'( Y----- e Cis-a i'1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areaswhicheexpertiseandhaveidentifiedareasofprobableimpactorarewheadditioalinformationisneededtoproperlyassessthisproposal. t- l'-'- 2i/-Signature of Directo r Authorized Representative Date P RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLP,Ni\ NG DIVISION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET(OF RENTON ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-030-89 D APR 1 8 1989 PROPONENT: The Austin Company L5 C 11 V PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build a five story (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in the Office Park Zone. (Note: applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; staff has advised that this number of spaces is in excess of Code requirements, and that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number of spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the project with the excess number of spaces retained for the present. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING. DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 3, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:jy& plash+ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 7--Z267- DATE YaWf-i7SIGNATUREOFDIRECTORORAUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RE1v i uN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L.ARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Payk. 20,14Pc.crca lM DATE CIRCULATED: 4-18-89 COMMENTS DUE: 5-3-89 ECF 030-89 LI Y,`;;L',d APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 030-89 D MAY 1 i gg8 PROPONENT: The Austin Company E C i f V E PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build afivestory (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in tOfficeParkZone. (Note: Applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; stahasadvisedthatthisnumberofspacesisinexcessofCoderequirements, a that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number o spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the projectwiththeexcessnumberofspacesretainedforthepresent. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . SITE AREA 8. 8 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 199, 000 s. f. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY1. Earth 2 . Air O 0 0 3 . Water 0 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health o 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics O 11. Light & Glare o O 12 . Recreation 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 14 . Transportation 15. Public Services 0 16. Utilities COMMENTS: 1114/a/- l al e'0f oar r-ecs-c e 74-/-c,..,. ,17c. o me.,,cre glares-- /'AA?,Q C. fe G y cle siw cge ,le "N747'¢4`%-- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where addition 1 information is needed to properly assess this proposal . Signature o Directo r Author zed Representative Date RENi..h4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DL__.RTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-030-89 m L'f y " fjaj fl_ ; PROPONENT: The Austin Company '' tt Pe MAY 1 989 PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Buil i gR BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build a five story (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in the Office Park Zone. (Note: applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; staff has advised that this number of spaces is in excess of Code requirements, and that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number of spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the project with the excess number of spaces retained for the present. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 3, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ti'l / etrevedI-%. !fere/!?v/ f 4V4 Z /Jbe!v4L/ZGJAPPROVEDAPPROVEDWITHCONDITIONSNOTAPPROVED Fee ar`ec( 40a/a. DATE J! r < V SIG TUR IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 a MEMORANDUM DATE: May 11, 1989 TO: Lenora Blauman FROM: John Morris SUBJECT: Austin Company - GSA/FAA Office Building There are several issues related to this project that need to be addressed: 1.RECREATION A. The applicant has provided no active or passive recreation facilities on- site. This is unacceptable in light of the recreation needs of the one thousand or so employees who will occupy the site, nine to ten hours a day. B. The applicant has not provided indoor recreation or shower facilities which would make possible a larger variety of employee recreation activities either before work, at noon, or after work. C. The issue of off-site recreation impacts should also be addressed by the applicant. These impacts have historically been mitigated either through contributions to a recreation fund or through the development of a variety of off-site recreation facilities. 2.TRANSPORTATION A. There is no on-site pedestrian circulation system to or from the sidewalk and to or from the west parking area. B. Bicycle parking and locking facilities need to be provided close to the entrances. C. South West 16th Street is a designated bike route, so a five foot on-street bicycle travel lane (including the gutter) needs to be provided for. These lanes will serve both recreation and commuter riders, especially those who will be using the Springbrook Trail bike route through the valley. A general comment in terms of site design. The streetscape will be enhanced the closer the building is sited to it. The current site plan separates the building from the street with four rows of parking on the north side and two rows of parking on the east side. RE__._JN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT yr j-ARTMENT N,. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: SA-ornn W - DATE CIRCULATED: 4-18-89 COMMENTS DUE: 5-3-89 ECF 030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build afivestory (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8 .8 acre parcel in tOfficeParkZone. (Note: Applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; stahasadvisedthatthisnumberofspacesisinexcessofCoderequirements, athatitislikelythatarecommendationwillbemadeforareducednumberospaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the projectwiththeexcessnumberofspacesretainedforthepresent. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . SITE AREA 8 . 8 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 199, 000 s. f. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY1. Earth 2 . Air 3 . Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8 . Land & Shoreline Use o 0 9 . Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare o 12 . Recreation o 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 14 . Transportation 15. Public Services o 0 0 16. Utilities COMMENTS: ' 1 i A l.d-{Y\{Y1:M: i.l rii i MAY 5 1989 EMdC We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areaswhichwehaveexpertiseandhaveidentifiedareasofprobableimpactorarewhereadditionalinformationisneededtoproperlyassessthisproposal. Signature of Director or nthorizedi 575/72RepresentativeDate RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build a five story (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in the Office Park Zone. (Note: applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; staff has advised that this number of spaces is in excess of Code requirements, and that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number of spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the project with the excess number of spaces retained for the present. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: 34byw c,Y COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 3 , 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S-tovw1 W APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Sew 60-F„,i,cD ry,c-n-0 DATE 5/5/1r, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: May 4, 1989 TO: Jeanette McKague, Senior Planner FROM: Garth Cray, Storm Water Utility Engineering C SUBJECT: G.S.A/F.A.A. Office Building We have the following comments on the environmental review for the subject project: 1. The 100-year flood plain, as F.E.M.A. determines it, is based upon existing conditions only and does not address future development in the valley. Under future development conditions, without the P-1 Project in place and improvements made to the Green River Levees, it is possible that the site would be in the 100- year flood plain. This issue must be addressed. 2. Water quality needs to be addressed through the use of baffled oil/water separators and biofiltration of the drainage prior to release. We are very concerned about the amount of impervious area on the site. The site plan needs to incorporate allowance for biofiltration. 3. Should the existing drainage system capacity be able to carry a 25-year storm peak flow, the detention required will be 10-year with a 10-year release rate. If it is determined the system is under capacity for the 25-year storm, then the release rate will be controlled by the capacity of the system (what year storm can the existing system handle without flooding) and detention will be for the 25-year storm. The pre and post development outflow should match for the lower flows as well as the final design storm (Example: for the 10-year design, the release rate should match for the 2-year storm as well as the 10-year.) The design should be performed using S.C.S. unit hydrograph method and a 24-hour duration. S/G/GSA-FAA/GDC:If CITY OF RENTON r- ILii MAY 5 1989 REN'ION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DLL- IRTMENT p`'` f 'S- ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH T4 tr f REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: irc. e..L1 er-I-WY\ DATE CIRCULATED: 4-18-89 COMMENTS DUE: 5-3-89 ` g- V_ Iy89 ECF 030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company E' , 083 PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build afivestory (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in tOfficeParkZone. (Note: Applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; stahasadvisedthatthisnumberofspacesisinexcessofCoderequirements, a that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number ospaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the projectwiththeexcessnumberofspacesretainedforthepresent. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . SITE AREA 8 . 8 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 199, 000 s. f. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY1. Earth 2 . Air 3 Water L.,.7 ° 4 . Plants 0 o 5. Animals o O O 6. Energy & Natural Resources o 7. Environmental Health 8 . Land & Shoreline Use o O 9. Housing o O O 10. Aesthetics 0 11. Light & Glare o 12 . Recreation i/0 0 o 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation i 15. Public Services O 16. Utilities COMMENTS: / O A iP —l/1 0r. im aci5 /)d f 06X </GY! We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have ide tified areas of probable impact or arewhereadditionalinformationisneedtoperlyassessthisproosal. 02 rSignatureofDirectororAuthorizdRepresentiveDa V RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build a five story (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel intheOfficeParkZone. (Note: applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; staff has advised that this number of spaces is in excess of Code requirements, and that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number of spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the project with the excess number of spaces retained for the present. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS, APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 3, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Q(4..L /PT LVeM't-dm APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shalt comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes.,.._... No Preliminary fire flow cal ations show a fire flow of e2 7O is required hydrants with a minimum flow of o"e-i/gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within Ait4 feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within " 34 feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler spits is required to protect the total structure. Yes.._, No Ali fire department access roads Naito be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes X. No All fire hydrants are required to be igatelilltd = • ap d prior to.construction. Yes_K No DATE iZO SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHO' ED• REPRES NT q, VE REV. 6/88 1 RE1 iurT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Dr,r±tRTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE 4pR OCC et % ... REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: iII 1„-. c r c,, DATE CIRCULATED: 4-18-89 COMMENTS DUE: 5-3-89 s89 n, ECF 030-89 v (s / APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build afivestory (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in tOfficeParkZone. (Note: Applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; stahasadvisedthatthisnumberofspacesisinexcessofCoderequirements, athatitislikelythatarecommendationwillbemadeforareducednumberospaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the projectwiththeexcessnumberofspacesretainedforthepresent. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . SITE AREA 8 . 8 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 199, 000 s. f. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY1. Earth O 2 . Air 0 3 . Water 0 o 4 . Plants 5. Animals o 6. Energy & Natural Resources o 7 . Environmental Health o 8 . Land & Shoreline Use o O 9. Housing K ° 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12 . Recreation X ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areaswhichwehave„„e- ertise and have identified areas of probable impact or arewhereadditionalinformati , is needed to properly assess this proposal.14-w,9-- (7,1;-; - Signaturedf Director or Authorize 7 d Representative Date a RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAcTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build afivestory (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel intheOfficeParkZone. (Note: applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; staff has advised that this number of spaces is in excess of Code requirements, and that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number of spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the project with the excess number of spaces retained for the present. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 3, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED k APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Ga r i DATE /=0_9(---,7SIGNATUREOFpCTORORAUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 k RI DN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ?ARTMENT IAA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 1 9 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: '.,r 1 4 9 DATE CIRCULATED: 4-18-89 COMMENTS DUE: 5-3-89 42 ECF 030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build afivestory (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8 .8 acre parcel in tOfficeParkZone. (Note: Applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; stahasadvisedthatthisnumberofspacesisinexcessofCoderequirements, a that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number o spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the projectwiththeexcessnumberofspacesretainedforthepresent. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . SITE AREA 8 .8 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 199 , 000 s. f. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY1. Earth i - 2 . Air 3 . Water 4 . Plants 0 5. Animals O 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 O 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12 . Recreation 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 14 . Transportation 15. Public Services 0 16. Utilities COMMENTS:kii o /'N .0 VwtliC C9Lr ' J A /l Co(i C p/ /" U Z. bJ ate-r' G„a / 91% of,43,t.6:21p, , 6 o Ae6-0-424 .,„-,_.„ 414-ea,l,„, C_e:_y L.,,L„_r7_,nrr(J s ,,,, C' .e If-,'u'LC LG`J 4 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Sigiature of Director or Authorized Representative Date i RENIUN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT bi±ARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build a five story (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in the Office Park Zone. (Note: applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; staff has advised that this number of spaces is in excess of Code requirements, and that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number of spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the project with the excess number of spaces retained for the present. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 3 , 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 6JAI 0(/‘;t6;6 ":-,x2-4,-, 3 f/ DATE 95SIG/1-‘ 47?---e; TURE OFr DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENT ATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \ __'11`C, DATE CIRCULATED: 4-18-89 COMMENTS DUE: 5-3-89 PLFt i,2 D/\fislQN ECF 030-89 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 030- 89EENMAY41989 PROPONENT: The Austin Company H I V PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build afivestory (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8. 8 acre parcel in tOfficeParkZone. (Note: Applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; stahasadvisedthatthisnumberofspacesisinexcessofCoderequirements, a that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number o spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the projectwiththeexcessnumberofspacesretainedforthepresent. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . SITE AREA 8 . 8 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 199 , 000 s. f. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY1. Earth 2 . Air o O O 3 . Water o O O 4 . Plants o O O 5. Animals o 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 0 o O 7. Environmental Health 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics o 11. Light & Glare M 12 . Recreation o O 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °fie ° 0 e 14 . Transportation o O O 15. Public Services N" 16. Utilities 0 p„/) ° 0 COMMENTS: See attachment. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal .e64,„:44; Signature 402c-t-if4/tee,.of Director or Au orized Representative Date THE AUSTIN COMPANY GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING 1 . Assessment for Burlington Industrial Park Benefit Zone. Office Space 199,000 Code - General Office 710 Trip Rate 13.72 per 1,000 sq. ft. Assessment amount $197.00 per trip 13.72 x 199,000 = 2,730.28 total trips generated 1,000 197.00 x 2,730.28 = $537,865.16 - Transportation Benefit Zone Assessment Fee 2. Building required to have a commuter information center. Also preferential parking space is to be assigned to multi-occupant vehicles and vanpool uses. 3. Developer to work with Metro to provide a bus shelter on the west side of Lind Ave. SW nearest to site. 4. Driveway width to be 30' . 5. Existing street light in proposed driveway off Lind Ave. SW to be relocated by a City approved lighting contractor and not just removed as shown on plan. 6. SW 16th Street - Lind Ave. SW to Raymond Ave. SW overhead power distribution conductors below 55KV to be undergrounded and placed underneath the proposed sidewalk. The developer will need to provide for this undergrounding arrangement with Puget Sound Power & Light Company. One spare 2-inch conduit will need to be provided for future street lighting which will be installed when SW 16th Street roadway improvements are installed as part of the City's Six-Year Improvement Program. Future street light conduit will need to terminate in a B-type junction box every 200 feet with junction box placed at back of sidewalk. 7. Lind Ave. SW - a right turn deceleration lane needs to be provided for driveway approach. Submittal of design plans required. RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNij+i DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEE # Ci1YOFR NIONuv ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-030-89 4 198910PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build a five story (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in the Office Park Zone. (Note: applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; staff has advised that this number of spaces is in excess of Code requirements, and that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number of spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the project with the excess number of spaces retained for the present. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 3 , 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: a,74c' G;,li7 EePy , APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED See attachment. DATE . y REPRESENTATIVE S SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR A THORIZED REP REV. 6/88 4 4 THE AUSTIN COMPANY GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING 1 . Assessment for Burlington Industrial Park Benefit Zone. Office Space 199,000 Code - General Office 710 Trip Rate 13.72 per 1,000 sq. ft. Assessment amount $197.00 per trip 13.72 x 199,000 = 2,730.28 total trips generated 1,000 197.00 x 2,730.28 = $537,865.16 - Transportation Benefit Zone Assessment Fee 2. Building required to have a commuter information center. Also preferential parking space is to be assigned to multi-occupant vehicles and vanpool uses. 3. Developer to work with Metro to provide a bus shelter on the west side of Lind Ave. SW nearest to site. 4. Driveway width to be 30' . 5. Existing street light in proposed driveway off Lind Ave. SW to be relocated by a City approved lighting contractor and not just removed as shown on plan. 6. SW 16th Street - Lind Ave. SW to Raymond Ave. SW overhead power distribution conductors below 55KV to be undergrounded and placed underneath the proposed sidewalk. The developer will need to provide for this undergrounding arrangement with Puget Sound Power & Light Company. One spare 2-inch conduit will need to be provided for future street lighting which will be installed when SW 16th Street roadway improvements are installed as part of the City's Six-Year Improvement Program. Future street light conduit will need to terminate in a B-type junction box every 200 feet with junction box placed at back of sidewalk. 7. Lind Ave. SW - a right turn deceleration lane needs to be provided for driveway approach. Submittal of design plans required. 01 ® CITY OF RENT.ON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division MEMORANDUM Date: May 12, 1989 To: Don Erickson Lenora Blauman From: Clint Morgan Subject: The Austin Company GSA/FAA Office Building Please amend the Plan Review Comments on the above referenced proposed development as follows: Revise Plans review item No. to read as follows: SW 16th St. - Lind Ave. SW to Raymond Ave. SW overhead power distribution conductors below 55KV to be undergrounded and placed under or behind the sidewalk. The developer will need to provide for and make those arrangements with Puget Sound Power & Light Company. Remove reference to future street light conduit. Provide for channelization of a center lane two way left turn lane at the driveway entrance off Lind Ave. SW. Channelization plans to be submitted. Provide for street lighting on-SW 16th St. Plans to be coordinated with City proposed street improvements on SW 16th St. Submit drawing for approval. 4\ SW 16th St. - Provide vehicle turn-out in front of building for drop-off of passengers on SW 16th St. Show plan on drawing. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 CEM/pf CEM093 v. 1! - RE )N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L, ARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CLA-rrrre,rt r‘% DATE CIRCULATED: 4-18-89 COMMENTS DUE: 5-3-89 ECF 030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build afivestory (199 , 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in tOfficeParkZone. (Note: Applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; stahasadvisedthatthisnumberofspacesisinexcessofCoderequirements, athatitislikelythatarecommendationwillbemadeforareducednumberospaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the project 'with the excess number of spaces retained for the present. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . SITE AREA 8. 8 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 199 , 000 s. f. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY1. Earth 2 . Air 3 . Water o 4. Plants o O - 5. Animals o 6. Energy & Natural Resources o 7. Environmental Health o 8. Land & Shoreline Use o 9 . Housing 10. Aesthetics o 11. Light & Glare o 12 . Recreation o 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation o 15. Public Services o 16. Utilities COMMENTS: 0D reCgSTUNO CIR,CuL 1411®IV iNTLOO*13 PIKE 5179‘ it, L/q I'0440 .d WALNW 1 I R,S SI4OVe,,O 13e PR,Ounovo port SAP-rr Lo ALKwi4 f S S\4okx.c)LO Vag Lsa sidei To 1-t4e s71tay1 slog turiVll‘b Til pir.imt 1 t li 6 Alloy Feed rat VALIT 19041790trlnov6vntivibold56r366tfiO , r. AirWehavereviewedthisapplicationwithparticularattent .n . e areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. A". • • r Signature of Di to_r or Authorized Representative Date 1 i 510 ULID ON slit riECP, 1loro 1 prtoosodo or. rn Pyrdio OOO tiyvt pLOOtt$ wstioE cam, cvr si oe cid rS#6 600111, CAR, *mom s No) yt4 Rpipt•icitme Low')1 risqmosierrioulD Iry 11#6 vomi e 1 I 1 4 REN'IuN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build a five story (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8 .8 acre parcel in the Office Park Zone. (Note: applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; staff has advised that this number of spaces is in excess of Code requirements, and that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number of spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the project with the excess number of spaces retained for the present. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 3, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: r4JIk)/ , DIVISION. APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED PAPt6ERW - P' tPoseo 853 sl'Pt-l... Pb T (Al 5P IN* 0 tG,b551 a .. 1r14t. PRtpo5to PlAro1 i u(o5 stem w rv®KSI; .dc) NT, 1 o t"l i tti1,r171•41 11 v(, T I t• VOit SC v6 cf 146 SuIVDiti, WoutooS'Ga,E 5r I w c R tstu, 5t Z L OF , kAmOSCApI,C r N -e,R1 BLS,.6IC`Wt.t PNIX si4OOLb 134 PL®ol6GrI4A1asSk4OV(40 lbg 1' Wr ml rJ '1'P r i rw La-f /ir i O L O Afg m cor1C K,u pTI446Mr9a1vt /4 pgt &ct Cc r i Pt vily DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 7 RE_...vN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LL•rARTMENT C'/ a ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEEP 11164) %). a; REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: hC-. y /. B 'J' cS 2 DATE CIRCULATED: 4-18-89 COMMENTS DUE: 5-3-89 O v ECF 030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build afivestory (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8 . 8 acre parcel in tOfficeParkZone. (Note: Applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; stahasadvisedthatthisnumberofspacesisinexcessofCoderequirements, a that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number ospaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the projectwiththeexcessnumberofspacesretainedforthepresent. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . SITE AREA 8 . 8 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 199, 000 s. f. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY1. Earth o 2 . Air o 3 . Water o 4 . Plants o 5. Animals o 6. Energy & Natural Resources o 7. Environmental Health o 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing o 10. Aesthetics o 11. Light & Glare o 12 . Recreation o 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 14 . Transportation o 15. Public Services t/ ° 16. Utilities COMMENTS: 9614li1,' OF pith V_CA7lq toy v04DIL VelOp 01 R -v b l,c,-I' vLO f-lit e S10 K .b LA-LAA— pVohLe,vviS. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are whe e additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. t kA/lY Th 4- VI CISignatureDirororAuthorizedRepresentativeDate REN'tvad COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEraRTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build afivestory (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel intheOfficeParkZone. (Note: applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; staff has advised that this number of spaces is in excess of Code requirements, and that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number of spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the project with the excess number of spaces retained for the present. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 3, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1LLC2D APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED gYtt,VV 4livh\ne6 -havov_q)/lk paA/L_Cvn .t5 a-Lk*, t)6 CLIALL pOtfai4 ,A10-1/ 14,C-C, a0StUtrA- ,V1A. r GLWAC_6G L w -ftie. -bUl ;l,vvu CLc,I4 Hof- CACyvLeY jQItJI h,,,yr DATE UA Z SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 REV. 6/88 ti 3 RL.,JN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UJYARTMEN C/;''%t ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW 1 `T E . U' 94)._45;4, 1 1 f y z yT 1/ v REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Cili Wke.. 19eDATECIRCULATED: 4-18-89 COMMENTS DUE: 5-3-89 C O 9 dc, eECF030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build afivestory (199 , 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in tOfficeParkZone. (Note: Applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; stahasadvisedthatthisnumberofspacesisinexcessofCoderequirements, a that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number ospaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the projectwiththeexcessnumberofspacesretainedforthepresent. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . SITE AREA 8. 8 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 199 , 000 s. f. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY1. Earth 2 . Air 3 . Water 4 . Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12 . Recreation o 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 14 . Transportation o 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: 4 Yj We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional infor ation is needed to properly assess this proposalf d----- a 12 /?qSignatureofDirecororAutho4, Ied Representative Date k REhi.N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build a five story (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8 .8 acre parcel in the Office Park Zone. (Note: applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; staff has advised that this number of spaces is in excess of Code requirements, and that it is likely that a. recommendation will be made for a reduced number of spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the project with the excess number of spaces retained for the present. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 3 , 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Ori.L./Ty A14 A G,E,Pi Ce APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I, NOT APPROVED lt SE CotukEvers or) UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO C/T NITA 0 D 'Pl2 i*TS yA dATECOMERSAGREEMENT-VJ,'Wit yI'S 1w iQ ..C.DZS'Ofii• ft. X /2.•.30/.t-- 1 3'4j/?. g ' LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SE::a ,...-a a SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CIIAt:CE-VIA:.]S Aft. 4,x 3'g3, .gr 4' =} fu,3 5.fz SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER, 1,4e D,FX n As;135,0&SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CUM-WATER _A ® 34 664.24SPECIALASSESSMENTAREACI9Ai3E-SEWERR A/O APPROVED WATER PLAIT RGGlwi aE APPROVED SEWER PLAN 1401 1tEQUitL - iF l-17 SEoJeL is loslAut0 TOAPPROVEDFIREHYDRANTLOCATIONSEkislir(: NH _ qi- g9DTFIREDEPT. . YES EI 'r_ANALYSIS rlo SuSM•1't'iED PREdtalimAit1f 'i cAws Mt£ Orr APPROu O. oii.GtO -, c.R DATE .' l2 SIGNATURE OF DIRE OR OR AO leRIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 ,a/ce : e LQ49 REa.4- : S/IZ/$9 e7iO THE AUSTIN BOO SOUTHWEST I6TH ST. RENTON, WA 98055 COMPANYPHONE: 206/226-8800 TELECO PI ER: 206/228-5471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223-01 AU-ST-IC-T377N3 April 26, 1989 Ms. Lenore Blauman CITY OF RENTON Senior Planner APR 2CityofRenton 7 1989 + 200 Mill Avenue South MOVERenton, Washington 98055 Subject: ECF: SA-030-89 Parking Requirements Austin W.O. 89-5477 Dear Ms. Blauman: It has come to my attention that an error exists on the site plan concerning the amount of parking indicated. The parking spaces required should read 853 cars total. This is based on the requirements setforth in 4-2208 of the Building Regulations for the City of Renton which is 1 car per 200 SF of net leaseable area. Our net leaseable for this building is approximately 170, 600 SF. Per requirements indicated above the total parking spaces should equal 853 cars. If you have any questions or comments please contact me. Ver truly yours, Robert G. nyder Project Coordinator RGS/ddl 9A 1 OF f;F U 0 0 NOTICE2NOTICEqQb. 09^l e°sepse.OAP OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLI DESCRIPTION : GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-030-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval to build a five story 199,000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in the Office Park Zone. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 1601 LIND AVENUE S.W. (AT RAYMOND STREET) PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SITE PLAN APPROVAL BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVEDBYTHEBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTONBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , Mar( Says\a. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON Agri k4-, 1at9 ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington kresidingincN7-6) on the ?!. r/ SIGNED : h?i/ ,ldayofaPP/L I(4R9 1; OF i 1'eo OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-030-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval to build a five story 199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8 . 8 acre parcel in the Office Park Zone. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 1601 LIND AVENUE S.W. (AT RAYMOND STREET) PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SITE PLAN APPROVAL BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTANYTIMEPRIORTOPUBLICHEARINGSANDDURINGPUBLICHEARINGS, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTONBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION1a NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-030-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval to build a five story (199,000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in the Office Park Zone. GENERAL LOCATION: 1601 LIND AVENUE S.W. (AT RAYMOND STREET) PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. j WAY '".. IGRADY _ "'LI r'..'' I 1 BOX CULVERTS LIMITED AGGRESS FREEWAY IMERSTATE t 405 H I. H,"'---- THE CAINPANY 'ELHOL Wa I ETTTLLUMBER INNUGSATCREA IaJ ELECTE5C I I I PARKI =_] I SW 16TN ST I WGET POME // _ _ F"- _____-__ _`I U _-- --_-__ _-f_ __7 S00-IONV r-I , I FI11II i I PROPOSED BETLVIST BELOTWEST ``II BUILDING / GROUP HEALTH I CO-OPERATIVE I la I O i I N LOT 2 LOT 3 I al N.e LONGACRES I I 1 Z I a ' I I I VALLEY OFFICE PARK I I I N J a V • I, nrL:'I , 11 I 11CITYOFRENTON 14 IIWI I Y O D _o_ 4 D. ( 411th; •tn SCALE:1 =4o'-a THE AUSTIN I EST 1/4 w ISECTION19-23-5 HOLMES ELECTRIC I a I SEATTLE LUMBERCOMPANYIIcoNc. AON. I I I I I I a I 3 I 1I2E PROPOSED 24' T U t ACCESS DRIVE 18"SS-— 1 g 18^SS——— ! N s 18"SS— 0 SW 1_6T H STREET 1027.81' -N 89. 352/ST E _ I - ID CAS- EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT-PI PIEIIINE 12"Cl-W-\fiSDEWASK, 4s_ I CAS--- OLYWIC __GAS- 12"CI-W— — -- --_ PIPELINE— 12"CI-W I \ YCi IC EXIST. PUGET POKER 1H 10' EASE1ENf FJPELI NE EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT 7 I L Q 202.67' 240.1 N 89. 35' 25" i4 EXIST SIDEWALK/ CShh JO' PUGET POWER EASELENf LANDSCAPING L 412.89' EXIST. POWER POLE I / r--• SIDEIWLK Die f—fttlt fifil tf I 1-10' EASEMENTS I I t l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I_L `°\©EXIST. 6' CONC. 1/ It - X. X X W 1 El of IIII1nI1I Y i d II2cI• I PUGET POWER ;I I O 2 WINDIGP 0 el SUBSTATION RAil II I 5 orwntk BUILDING I zl 0 z .......... Fs ENTRANCE._T _ , n AO— v ? 1 — . 2 U)z J0m1a gYm = 'I W2IN GROUP Q - — I o z m I SIDEWALK— HEALTH I Nd u•„ a 240.17' -N89. 35' 25" E I 1NW I II I `- o LANDSCAPING I OFFICE BUILDING J a — o I tt ccpp o o _ MAIN LEVEL FIN. FLR. EL.21.50 J I I 1 1111111111111111111113f R LYE 4R I cl I W I I BOE I NGJ IGAT I` — ' V COMPUTER1WATERRI.EiERI N 63,5— 4 10' EASE ct P I SERVICES 3• COMPOUND 16J 1AVERT.RS 14" BPS-10' EASEIENf 1 LANDSCAPING 3"W `i I J I I 111 I I I I I I I I I I 111 111 11111111 I I I I I I I 1111111 I. f I PRDPaED26" FIRE HYDRANT• I J 6"X 1" DOUBLE DETECTOR LOADING 1 105' I 6 S14EWAL11CRIVALVESEABYDOCK QQII iiihlIII I11III hlIII hIlII Y Yi"IIIIII(II I I II I II I 1J I] hI I} I I1I F R ItE T U Eil OINgC11 NhI I I I I I I( I I( I I TOEXIST. LLIIGHHT STANDARD ACCESSVE I` i I I II I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I VI I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I - r IPR B ED'24ED I i y 'C / •ACCE DfiIVE 1 I I PRiiEN10' I , I l l I I II I 962.90' -N 89' 49'A01"W LFTEXIST. 10•WIA STUB AT PROPERTY LINE EXIST. 10' LANDSCAPING STRIP I, EXISTING 24' 4 EXIST. 10"WW EXISTING 24'I I ACCESS DRIVE T— O J ACCESS DRIVE VALLEY OFFICE PARK I I SITE PARKING II ACCESSEXISTING24 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED=853 • TOTAL PARKING REO'D=758 FULL SIZE=497 24 19 HANDICAP=8 SECURED=8 • 25 30 COAPACT=340 w. arcs o. E O p THE AUSTIN SCALE 1"=40-0- TITLE SITE PLAN o.PO. 89-5477 s CADD COMPANY o.TT 03-30-89 tea G.S.A.mn C-2 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS CHO RAK ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS DATr XX-XX-89 kUS'.'Iop, SW 16T H STREET, RENT ON, WA. MI 0 CITY OF RENTON LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION April 18, 1988 Robert G. Snyder The Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 Re: GSA/FAA Office Building r 1601 Lind Avenue SW ECF; SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Snyder: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for review by the Technical Advisory Committee on May 10, 1989. If you have any questions regarding the.scheduling of this project, please contact Lenora Blauman of our office or me at 235-2550. Sinc ly, EA.Aia_L____,_ j L . Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/mjp 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 a THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. RENTON, WA 98055 COMPANYPHONE: 206/226-8800 TELECOPIER: 206/228-5471 ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS• BUILDERS 223-01. AU-ST-IC-T377N3 April 14 , 1989 f= ltl is _ DRRS .,1 CITY OF REM ON APR 1 4 1989 Ms . Lenore Blauman 2 D pp Senior Planner L5 U City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , Washington 98055 Subject : Traffic Impact Assessment Study Project File ECF : SA-030-89 Dear Ms . Blauman : Per my conversation with Clint Morgan of your traffic engineering department , this letter is to inform you that the City of Renton Traffic Department and Jim Mclssac of Transpo agree that an amended study is not necessary at this time . The additional 25 , 000 square feet added to the project , from 174 , 000 square feet to 199 ,000 square feet , will not impact the traffic findings and requirements for this project . We are aware that the additional square footage will increase the trips generated . It is our intent to amend the Traffic Assessment Study , as required , when the City has completed their review and comments on this project . If you have any comments or questions concerning this , please contact me . Very truly yours , obert G. Snyder Project Coordinator RGS/ddl cc : Mr . Clint Morgan , City of Renton Traffic Department Mr. Jim Mclssac , Transpo EaTHE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. RENTON, WA 98055 COMPANY PHONE: 206/226-8800 TELECOP IER: 206/228-5471ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223-01 AU-ST-IC-T377N3 March 22 , 1989 Mr. Donald Erickson Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , Washington 98055 SubjectL Determination of Significance GSA/FAA Office Building - Renton , Washington Austin W. O. 89-5477 Dear Mr. Erickson : In accordance with Section 4-2813 of the Building and ZoningRegulationsfortheCityofRenton , we hereby request earlynoticeofwhetheraDeterminationofSignificanceislikely ornotunderWAC-197-11-350. As this project is on an accelerated schedule , we would appreciate your prompt and personal attention . Ver truly yours , lam• Robert G. Snyder Project Coordinator RGS/ddl PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON DI MAR 2 2 1989 tin r zie - , o C . I, Y OF R E N T O, F iLE NO, : J/,'O_O 69 E; ® + BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT r-GE'-O30-b/ 0 MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your :specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES The Austin Company REZONE*(FROM ToADDRESS rr--— 800 S.W. 16th Street L---J SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP I I TEMPORARY PERMIT* Renton , Washington 980551:::] CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* w , TELEPHONE r^n SITE PLAN APPROVAL 976 206) 226-8807 Q SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* From Section: NAME Justification Required Robert G. Snyder ADDRESS i SUBDIVISIONS: 800 S.W. 16th Street Q SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP 0 TENTATIVE PLAT Renton , Washington 98055 Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 206) 226-8800 Q WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS NAME PLAT NAME: The Austin Company ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 800 S.W. 16th Street Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP Q FINAL Renton , Washington 98055 P.U.D. NAME:TELEPHONE 206) 226-8800 0 Residential Q Industrial QCommercial [2] Mixed LQCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERLY ADDRESS 1601 Lind Avenue Southwest Q TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY Vacant OP FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Office Building NUMBER OF SPACES, XX ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 1209 SQ. FT. ACRES AREA:oi 383.328 8.8 TOTAL FEES 2185 PLANNING nnfoi FF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STR UI I Y OF RENTQN APPLICATION RECEIVED BY, MAR 2 Z iy89 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE, Ec r Q Accepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED DY:4t(siefl APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 0 Accepted Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By; ROUTED TO: Initials) Q Building Q Design Eng. Q Fire Q Parks Q Police Q Policy Dev, Q Traffic Eng.g 0 Utilities Legal description of property (If more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). Lots 1 , 2 and 3 of Valley Office and Industrial Park, Subdivision 1 accord- ing to short olat recorded under. King County Recording Number 8002269013 except the east 240.06 feet of said Lot 1. And except those portions conveyed to the City of Renton for street purposes by deeds Recorded Numbers 7907230679, 8007070464, 8008200077 and 8202160354. w ; situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. AFFIDAVIT I, Robert G. Snyder being duly sworn, declare that I am Ea authorized representative to act for the property owner,Mi in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the Information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY . OF G/. ,C 19 P-7. , NOTARY PUDLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT 2471 Name of NotaryPublic)Signature of OXiififrin Owner's Representative EL lam.— F SC 800 S.W. 16th Street Address) Address) Renton , Washington 98055 City) State) (Zip) 206) 226-8800 Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed Inthe "Application Procedure." 1 BA PROJECT NARRATIVE The proposed project is to be situated on an approximately 8. 8 acre site located at the southwest corner of Lind Avenue and Southwest 16th Street . The site will provide parking for 853 cars . The site is fully landscaped , including irrigation systems and all parking is fully lighted . Driveways and parking areas will be asphalt paving with extruded concrete curbs at perimeter. Walks will be 3-1/2" concrete on prepared subgrade . All site utilities will be provided from sources at property line and run underground to the buildings . The proposed building is a first class leasable 5-story office structure of approximately 199 , 000 gross square fe.et with .a single tenant , GSA/FAA. Occupancy date for the building is scheduled for April 1990 with construction beginning May 1989 . The building structure will be steel framed , Type II-FR, founded on auger-cast concrete piling and reinforced concrete foundation . The exterior wall will be comprised of aluminum curtainwall with insulated glazing and modified thermal breaks . A " Dryvit " latex stucco system will be incorporated at ground floor and to form architectural design elements . Mechanical equipment will be roof mounted and screened to match exterior finish in color and will be approximately 10 feet above roof structure . e PLANNING DIVIS1Ot! CITY OF REN O V 1® MAR 2 2 1989 dot1 E CH O VE I OF Rj, ECF: [ 050-6j I u 4 0 z Cityof Renton• ea LU: L5Ae9 9A ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST4.3O1?f0 sEPZ • Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for aliproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly. with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully. to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark_designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal. even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: GSA/FAA Office Building 2.Name of applicant: The Austin Company 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, Washington 98055 Contact: Robert Snyder, Project Supervisor 4.Date checklist prepared: 3/1/89 5.Agency requesting checklist: Building & Zoning 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): MAR Project is scheduled to begin construction in May 1989 with® occupancy April 1990.PLANNING DIV/SiCM CITY OF2 R2 198EPNTrni9 i' ECEf V/ L L) 7.Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Please see attached site analysis and traffic impact study. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Lot line adjustment of Lot 1. City of Renton File #LLA-001-89 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site plan approval , building permits. Lot line adjustment. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposed building is a steel framed, 5-story office building consist- ing of approximately 199,000 gross SF situated on 8.8 acres. The site is located on Southwest 16th Street, bordered by Lind Avenue and Raymond Street. Parking will be provided for approximately 853 cars. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Valley Office & Industrial Park Subdivision 1 in the NW 1/4 SW 1/4, Section 19 Township 23 North, Range 5 East, .W.M. For additional information please refer to attached vicinity map and site plan) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than 1/2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? if you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Please refer to accompanying site study. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Please refer to accompanying site study and• geotechnical study. 2 - . 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. None 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description. purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial. containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system. the number of such systems. the number of houses to be served (if applicable). or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal. if any (include quantities. if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. This project will use the combined method which will store approximately. 30% of the storm water in underground pining system and the remainder on the Parking lot surface above each catch basin. Maximum depth of the H2O (from 10 year event) would be approximately 6" . 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so. generally describe. No 4 - e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Material will be brought onto this site to provide suitable base for floor slabs , walks , and parking structures. Source is unknown t this time. ((;borax. 18,000 cubic yards)f. Gould erosion occ as a result of clearing. construction, or use? If so. generally describe. Erosion is unlikely. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 70% to 80% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth. if any: Storm and surface area drainage. Paving and landscaped areas. I 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction; construction traffic/after occupancy; occasional delivery and- passenger autos. (Approximately 850) b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or In the Immediate vicinity of the site including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river It flows into. None 2) Will the project require any work over, in. or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. None 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 3 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface. ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Surface drainage devices. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: xx deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs xx grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other zc other types of vegetation Please refer to site survey) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All existing vegetation c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping proposed includes areas of native planting. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other none Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other field mice Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other none b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so. explain. Unknown 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Proposed landscaping will include a portion dedicated to the enhancement of wildlife. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical - for all power requirement. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building is designed to meet Washington State Energy Code. 7.Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None anticipated 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing traffic noise generated on Southwest 16th, Lind Avenue, 405 and 167. 6 - 2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise for an anticipated 9 - 10 months . Automobile noise after occupancy during business hours. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current use of the proposed building site is vacant. Property is bordered to the North center by Puget Power substation and Southwest 16th; to the South by Valley Office Park Building; the East and West by Lind Avenue and Raymond Street respectively. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not in recent past. c. Describe any structures on the site. The southwestern side is a partially developed gravel parking area. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so. what? Yes, all railroad ties, lighting stub-outs and drainage structures will be removed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Office Park f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option - Office g. If applicable. what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so. specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Anticipated working population would be 1000 persons. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. if any: None 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high. middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units. if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts. if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building materials) proposed. The building will be alum./glass curtainwall . "Dryvit" wall system will be utilized at ground level . The total height of building including parapet will be 77'-8". b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Some minor obstructions of Valley Office Park to the north. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The aesthetics of the proposed project will aarry on the theme of the surrounding projects. Providing harmony in an office park campus environment. ' Landscaping will reflect adjacent properties. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of orlightglare will theg proposal produce? What time of day would It mainly occur? The proposed project should produce no adverse glare offsite. b. Could glareorlightfrom the finishedg project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare Impacts, if any: Parking lot lighting will be designed to control spill off site. 8 - 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? A bike/jogging path is located on west side of Lind Avenue. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Please refer to vicinity map and site plan and traffic impact analysis. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, across Lind Avenue at East Valley Office Center approximately 150' east of proposed building and to south approx. 100' @ Valley Ofc. Park. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will provide parking for 853 cars. No parking will be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe indicate whether public or private). No 9 - e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water. rail. or air transportation? If so. generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Please refer to traffic impact study. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts. if any: Please refer to traffic impact study. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Any increased need would be in line with Planned development indicated by Renton Comprehensive Plan. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All utilities will be connected to the project from available street mains. C. SIGNATURE- the undersigned. state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Robert r,_ Sri,yrler 10 - I I er,o J 200 100 D 0: 400 f SCALE O CVI HOLIDAY INN GFLAOY WA--_ _ U CITY Of RENiON STORM WATER DRAINAGE NOTES r r---- I. BFfAE ANT CCNSTRUCIfaf OR DEV[LAKM ACi IVITT OCCURS A PRC{ONSiR1CiION KCiIrvG MIST BE HELD I WITH THE CITY a RENTON DEPARIKNT A PUBLIC WORKS.DFS:GN ENGINEER, TO BELLEVUE= 2, ALL CONSTRUCTION SWILL BE IN ACCORDOCE WITH THE1988STANDARDSPECIFICATIONSFORMAD.BRIDGE AM BOI CULVERTS LUAIICIPAL CONSRUCIION'PREPARED BY W S.D.O.T.,AID J 7 IK HE CITY S RENT PORES A550GAI ION LMIC),KO AMEMJED LIMITED AGGRESS FREEWAY INTERSTATE 4 405 BY THE CITY d RENTON OCPAMMEM a PUBLIC WALES. 3. THE STORY DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTEDACCORDINGi0THEAPPROVEDPLANSMRIONAREON FILEl! IN THE DEPARIKNT a PUBLIC WORM.AM DEVIATIONS FROM TO 1-5 3 I— I THE APPROED RAMS WILL REWIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL TROY 3 ly I TIE CITY OR STONY WA1CR TWINiOFTHECITYAHEMONDEPARTWINA PUBLIC WORKS.LESION In THE rII I' AUST I N W I 1. A tour a THESE APPRwlD PLANS MlSi BE ON THE JOB SITE I -a COWANY HOLMES la 1 SEATTLE I I I wI NFVER CONSTFIICi ION IS IN PROGRESS. 1I I LONCACRES I ELECTRIC LUMBER 1 r 5. Giw SHALL BE U.S.G.S,MUSS OTHERWISE APPROVED EN 1INDUSTRIALIIII 1•N 1 I I CITY A RENTON DEPAMKM A PUBLIC VOWS.REFERENCE PARK I W I I BENCHWRE AND ELEVATION ARE NOTED ON THE PLANS. J ` ---- I I -- --. I/` II L I I --_-J L-- L, 6. ALL SCDIKMAII WCRO510N FACILITIES N151 BE IN aEM110NN -_ -- 11__ STT BE SATISFA PRIOR TO CTORIILLY MAINTAAIINEDDING DUUNTILI CONSTRUCTIION.AND ONSW16THSTISHASPSCONFUTEDAHDTEEPOTENTleFORON!-SIIC EROSIONPWETPOSTER1II7SUBSTATIONI}//// 7. ALL RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITIES MST BE INSTALLED AND LJ i 1I I r INOPCRAIION PRIOtLO ORIN[ONIULTIONWITNAlLCONSTRLLi10N11. r IL I1PROPOSEDI ,1 BETA-WEST B. OU55 SEGO WY BC APRI[D BY NIDROSEEROVE THESTANDARD SLEDOPFICE /I LOT 1 BETA-WEST `1 NI%iURE,DINER TWLN CITY a RENION APPROVED SrANDARD NIXES. LOT 4 I SHALL BE SUBMITTED B/A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND APPROVED PrI\\\ 1 I i BUILDI ND I HE DEPARiKM Or PURL IC STORES,STORM WATER MIMIC. I I ..11V • I 1• I 9. ALL PIPE AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE LAID ON A PROPERLY I \\ GROUP HEALTH I 4 I I I I vREPARCD fWN01tI0N IN A[CORO0.NCE WnN SEOION T-0Z.JtU CO-OPERATIVE raRlRDAoixoNBRiDOEEcaaiAPGiIpiHISiWLLSVKLUOEAMECCSSARY I I I IEVEl lN4 a THE TRENCH BOTTOM OR THE TOP a THE IgINLUiION IN I I I I MATERIAL AS HELL AS RACCKM AND SO THAT TI a REOUIFEOINGWIERIAIPIPEWILLlORYGFADESOa.N 111E ENTIRELENGTHATHEWILLBESUPPORTEDONAUIFORYCLYDENSE O O TI UNYIELDING BASE ALL PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE AA T CLASS C.W I I Q , I WITH THE EXCEPTION A P.V,C.PIPE.All TRENCH BEGfILLIrlI I BE AND 90%OTHERWISENPERZ FORASTY D-1557-TO.PEATGRAVELAIO0 O O \\ \\\ IZ 1 I ELBEDDING SHALL BE 6'OVER Ate UNDER P,V C.PIPE 1 10.GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE AND ALUMINIZED STEEL PIPE FOR ALL 0 O \\ I I I I 1 I DRAINAGE F DELANDEOU151 DE,HAVE ASPHALT IREAIMEM AI A1 LOT 2 I I I BETTER 11.STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN 10 FEET A!KI1SPRINGLINEOFANYSTROMDRAINAGEPIPE.OR 15 FEET FROM O O W I W LOT 3 THE TOP A ANY CHANNEL BANE. LONGACRES I O I I UA I 12.ALL CATCH BASIN GRATES SHALL BE DEPRESSED 0.10 FEET BELOW I \ I TO PAVEKM LEVEL. r I I I i 13.OPEN CUT ROAD CROSSINGS TIWU EXISTING PUBLIC RIOl1-0l-WARZI A;\--- - VALLEY OFFICE PARK a I WILL NOT BE ALIENED MESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY THEJ CITY a RENTON DEPARTMENT Of PUBLIC MANS,DESIGN ENGINEER TA.ROCK(A EROSION PROTECTION A ROADSIDE DITCHES.WERE REWIPEO. SHALL BE A SHAM MARRY AXERACED i0 A DEPTH OF I FDO1 AID\ \1 • MUST KEY THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS:1'-IVIES-70x PASSING:7"-A'/30X-10X PASSING;AND-2.•ROCR/107-205 PASSINGILEGALDESCRIPTION5.ALL BUILDING WDON6P 5 AND FOOTING DRAINSSHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE STAW DRAINAGE SYSTEM.WEBS APPROVED BY THEIiIII10PARCEL"A": DEPARTMENT A PUBLIC MORNS.DESIGN ENGINEER A STORM WATERITOTS2AU3AVALLEYOFFICEANDINDUSTRIALPARK-SUBOIYI SI ON No I. DRAWINGY,AN ACCURATELY DIMENSIONED CERTIFIED AS BUILTACCORDINGTOTHESHORTPLATRECORDEDUNDERNIxGCOUNTYOPAWINGATHISDRAINAGESVSiCuWILEBESUBMITTEDTO THE RECORDING No.8002269013: CITY A RENNIN WON CLNPL[iION.I CITY 1 l Y I EXCEPT INCISE PORTIONS THEREOF CONNEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON 16.ISSUANCE A THE BUILDING OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT BY THEOFIWCITYARENTONDOESMIRELIEVETHEOWERATHEMIMINGTi I J I fCR STREET PURPOSES BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING LEGAL OBLIGATION AND/OR LIABILITY COMBCTED WITH STORM A RENTON 1 J NB'B.80070701161.8DO8200077 AND 8202160351,Q SURFACE INTER DISPOSITION.FATHER,THE CITY A RENTON I> I SITUATE IN TILE CITY A RENTON,CWMY A KING,STATE A WASHINGTON. DOES NON ACCEPT ANY OBLIGATION FOR THE PROPER FUNCTIONINGYAANDMAINTENANCEaTHESYSTEMPROVIDEDDURINGCONSTRUCTION,I VI 17.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATEI I W 1 PARCEL "EY' SAFEGUARD.SAFTEY DEVICES.PROTECTIVE COUIPKM,!DAGGERS,I I 1 LOT I OF VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK-SUBDIVISION No.I.SA(TEY ON THER CDC.ANOT NTOPROMECT PROPT ERTYLINC 1LONKCI TONIACCORDINGi0THESIOR1RATREGALEDUNDERWINGCOPOTWITHTHEPERFORWNCCaBORECOVEREDBYTHECONTRACT.ANY I I I J L- I RECORRDING An.8002269013: ROOT WITHIN iK TRAVELED RIGHI-0f-ANY THAT WY INTERRUPT I ZW NORMAL TRAFFIC FLOC SHAH REQUIRE AN APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL Y EXCEPT NNE CAST 210.06 FEET THEREOF: PLAN BY THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT A PII8LIC WORKS.ALL SECTIONS a W.5 D.O 1.STANDARDIV -- r--- O Ate EXCEPT LEY PORTION CONNOTED TO TIE CITY A RENTON SPECIFICATIONS I-01-23,TRAFFIC CAIROL SHALL APPLY, II I SIITUATEEIN iTTHEECITYOF ES BY RENTON.GLUMEDLYOFSIN JNDER RECORDINGSTATEGOF WASHINGTA9 LOUTION IS WITHIN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION ARC. 18.SPECIAL DRAT HALE KASACS WILL BE PEWIRED If iK PROJECT I TOTES DATE REVISION R MCP BATE REVISION to GWD HALO I•'=2DD-0" TITLE VICINITY MAP o.Io. 89-5477THEAUSTINBrCADD L COMPANY DATE 03-03-89 omen G.S.A.MET C-1 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS OW0 RAK ENGINEERS • CONSTRUCTORS PATE XX'AX-89 Locum,. SW 16TH STREET, RENT ON, WA. IONIC 1- — 10 20 0_ 40 80 im 4mi.s l N SCALP o•-o•CO SECTION 19-2-23-5 y- l " __ THE MUST I N I w I COMPANY I I C . WON. HOLMES ELECTRIC I a I SEATTLE LUMBER P I I I I N c I I I I CV _, wD TIIACCESSDRIVE l— 18"SS--- I ICI 5 '--- / \ IB SS l8 ss'Ez lit-fi Iy uu1SW16THSTREET1027.81' -N 19° 3S-' 25" E I - O - PIPELINE_ PROPOSED EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT PI PELIN 12"CI-W 6' SIDEWALK— GS_ CAS-_ OIYIPIC _—GAS- C''ES T 12 CI-W— YA7r'IC PI PEL INE 12"CI-W E EXIST. PUCET POWER W 10' EASEMENT EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT N hl Ea 202.87' -76.iT— N 89° 35' 25" 1 EXIST, SID Sh' 30' PUHCETT P}O-W-E-R}-EASEIENf -{--LII-' A-'NDSGPI NG S4 L 5.0' -N 01° 22' 58" E L-- 412.89' EXIST. POWER POLE _ I I/-- CONC. CURB t l I I I I I I f I I I ` I 10' EASEMENTS I • i I I I I 1 I II I I I I I I I I I I Q I /III EXIST. 6' CONC.1 I IT SIDEWALK III/I I I I I n k M k M k ,I II I c g IIo3IzI12HANDIGP9InW I PUGET POWER ' § II h_ O O e I wfr. cA _ SUBSTATION a o ; == I o_wr,IK BUI LDI NC it IQIfs w ENTRANCE-- --- I 3ti — I IfI1mIwilrIN GROUP Y k k A k _k v 1 1IDLK DITOHEALTH 240.17' -N_8_9. 35' 25" E o — I__,,' o 0 I_ 1 OFFICE BUILDING Z 01 1 LANDSGPI NG d1 5 — I MAIN LEVEL FIN. FLR. EL. 21.50 J I M I = 11111111111111111111 13 RHIGATIDNRtCt { — — _J _ I 10' EASEMEN/, (COMPUTER 1 Ir WATER METER in 6.. I Y I SERVICES TO' EAS!MENT } III I I I I I I I I I I i l l l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I %41 8'P SE I I (1.1 _ SS_ I11Ir - LA SGPI W 1 11111111111111111 1 1111111 111111 11 1111r ; _ a 111F— N 6" FIRE HYDRANT( i 6"X 1" DOUBLE DETECTOR LOADING 105'— REWALI{ C IY L1E SSE,W Y DOCK QQII II II II III l I 1 II II II II II II II IIr1 Ir1 1 III II II III 41 II II III I IrI II II t JO hI hI hI F R ET ` C IIIQIIIN hI I( ITO HT STANDARD ACCESSEORIVE I it I I I 1 I I I I IIII II1I II I I I T 1 A P ( III I 11 1I PR ED'24'I III ACCE DIiI VEII 1 III IIIII 111111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 111 11 I I 111 11 I MPI'°I I I I I I I l I I'I I I_I I I_I I I Li I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 I 962.90' -N 82° 49' 01"WoI- roTEXIST. IX'9NI STUB A- AT PROPERTY LINE EXIST. 10' LANDSCAPING STRIP EXISTING 24' Y' fEXI ST. 10"W6 EXISTING 24'I I ACCESS DRIVE r— os}ss•-WOee-- ACCESS DRIVE I 1VALLEYOFFICEPARK1 i I I ' I SITE_PARK!NG I I ACCESS DRIVE TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED•853 1TOTALPARKINGREO'D=758 FULL SIZE=497 24 19 HANDICAP=8 SECURED=8 25 30 COMPACT=340 NOTESDATE REV ISIOT O. DOD DATE REVISIOR In DOD cm& 1"=40-0" TITLE SITE PLAN w.o.w. 89-5477THEAUSTIN COMPANY DATE 03-30-89 OVER G.S.A.SWEET C-2 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS E RAK ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS LATE XX-XX-89 Loom:. SW 16TH STREET, RENTON, WA. ,ssu a 40 20 0 v) SCALEat o• THE GUST I N I N[sr l/4 coR. I 1 SECTION 19-23-5 HOLMES ELECTRIC SEATTLE LUMBERCOMPANYIICONC. LION. I a i Coll- C11 Lt' TH a to •\ C1T77) ` U 13"i 20.5 22.06) 22.9), 17.00)I _ SW 6TH STREET 1027.81• -NB9° 3 ' 25" E _ r i6.7ll 16.69) 17.6`7) 59) 20.05) ( 3) r t r-10' E SEMEN( 1 L,'©© 202.87' - 45.{'T N 89. 35' 25" 3 . 4 n 1 77./°A 30' PUCE POKER 5.0' -N 01° 22'412 :" B\\ `---T-0CONE. CURB I• 10' EASEAENTS E 7J B0-- 19.•0 I I 1 19.0 J`19.0 19.0/I T/C19.75/ 6' CONE. SIDEWALK 1 I L n W W M W " in T/F 18.25 `' I It T/F 8.0 I fNZ. T/F 18.25 F 18.0 u 19.50 7 E Ln toL Iz PUGET POWER 1 G19•0 V © ' 0 N 1 oNSUBSTATION19so19.so f LL I 19.5 Y18.22f 1£7b) / ,N. em. `\' BUI 00) I(18.68 o 19.50 19.50`\\ T/F 18.0 EMRA - O p z1 I __ _ _) 6 __ _ N / 12"CONE. r - L 1 N 19.50 CULVERT IN LAJ 9 INV, CIP OU1 INV. 14.0' ill YA\ GROUP a J a eHEALTHpT/F 18.019.so 19.so IIp1I V j\ T/F 18.0 I- JB I \ _ 18.68)) ) f926;t99- 90 1yo OFFICE B ILDING 1925 8 '-T 3 BOEING I J((``1 18.0 T/F 18 19.25 `‘\ S FIN. FLR. EL 21.50 I 10' EAiEAENT COMP TCERaCOMPUTER 10' EASEMENT j j19.50 19.50 19.50 . E T/F 18.0 = III Y 19.50 19.50 19.50 19.50 19.50 J O 18.36) 11 8 97) \ 19.50 19.50 =18.50 160) (17 7)T/F 18.25 T I II 1 1 aA. 18.50 T/F 18.0 I. ,--------T/F 18.0 L< F I .0 I I I I 18.75'1 .75-- 18.75 T/ '18.0 T/ '8.0 18.50` 7 18.50 18.75. I18.50 `\ I 17.20) 17.BW 17.7) (17.70)--962.90' -N 89' 49' or W 17.6o 17.60) 17.7W NciLoko 18.41) EROSION CONTROL NOTES: VALLEY OFFICE PARK EXIST. 10' LANDSCAPING STRIP PROVIDE 15"HIGH CONC. CURB TOP OF PAVEMENT EL. (18.5) I. ALL LIMITS OF CLEARING AND AREAS OF VEGEIAT ION PRESERVATION 3. THE EROSION AND SEDI WHIM ION CONTRA.SYSTEM DEPICTED ON 5. IN ANY AREA WHICH HAS BEEN STRIPPED OF VEGETATION AND*HERE TOP OF CURB EL. (19.0)I AS PRESCRIBED ON THE PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE 'THIS DRAWING ARE!MENDED TO BE MININN REOIIREIENTS 10 MET NO FURTHER WORM IS ANTICIPATED FOR A PERIOD Of 30 DAYS OR FIELD AND OBSERVED DURING CONSTRUCTION. AM ICIPATED S1TE CEFOITIOTTG.AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND LORE.ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE IIEEDIAIELY STABILIZED UNEXPCEIED OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE.THE PERM!IIEE STALL WITH MULCHING.GRASS PLANTING OR OTHER APPROVED EROSICN I 2. ALL REQUIRED SEDIMNTAT ION/EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES`UST BE ANTICIPATE THAT MORE EROSION AND SEDILENTAT ION CONTROL FACILITIES CONTROL TREATAENI APPLICABLE 10 THE TIME OF YEAR IN QUESTION, IN OPERATION PRIOR 10 LAND CLEARING AND/OR OTHER COGTRICI ION WILL BE NECESSARY ID INSURE COMPLETE SILTATION CONTROL ON THE GRASS SEEDING ALONE WILL BE ACCEPTABLE ONLY DURING THE LOONS TO INSURE T1N1 SEDIMENT LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE NATURAL PROPOSED SITE.DARING III COURSE Of CONSTRUCTION.II SHALL OF APRIL THROUGH SEPIEACEN INCLUSIVE.SEEDING MAY PROCEED, DRAINAGE SYSTEM.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT FACILITIES SHALL BE BE THE OBLIGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY O THE PERMITTEE TO HOWEVER,WHENEVER II IS IN THE INTEREST OF THE PAEMITIDE, MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CONDITION ANT IL SUCH TIME THAT ADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY HIS DUI LUST BE AUGMENTED WITH WLCHING,NETTING,O OTHER r i CLEARING AND/^N CONSIRUCUON IS COMPLETED AND POTENTIAL FOR NCI IVIIIES AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FACILITIES.OVER AND IRUILENT APPROVED BY THE CITY O RENTON.OUTSIDE THE Ilr.ON-SITE EROSION HAS PASSED.THE IMPLEMENTATION.MAINTENANCE, ABOVE MINIMUM REWI REAMS,AS LAY BE NEEDED TO PROTECT SPECIFIED 111E PERIOD. REPLACEMENT NRA ADDITIONS TO EROSI ON/SEDIMMa11W CONTROL ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND WATER QALIIY O THE RECEIVING 6. FOR ALL[RESTON/SEDILEMAi1W CONTROL PONDS WHERE THE DEADSYSIEIGSHALLBETHERCSPONSIBILIIxOfTHEPERMITTEE.DRAINAGE SYSTEM.STORAGE DEPTH EXCEEDS 64,A FENCE,A MINIMA OF 3 FEET HIGH 4. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS FOR ERCSIO/SEDIIEMATION CONTROL IS REWIRED.WITH 3.1 SIDE SLOPES. 24 19 ONLY,IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF STORM DRAINAGE 1. A TELPQARY'GRAVEL CONSTRUCTIONCTIW ENTRANCE.30'X 50'X W'Or A-TO 6- 25 30 ORSRET EN ION FAIGN.SIZE ACC ILIII1E5 OF PIPES.RESTRI CIOIS,CNANNElS, INCH SJARRY SPALLS SHALL BE LOCATED AT ALL POINTS OF VEHICULARMRESSANDEGRESS10THECONSTRUCTIONSITE. Ex GATE REVISION W! CH[D DATE MIS.. M COO Q THE AUSTIN KALE '"=40-0" mu GRAD ING PLAN W.A.NG. 89-5477 n CADD ZCOMPANYDAIS03-30-89 mot G.S.A S E[T C-3 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS HELD RAN ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS WE XX-XX-89 LOCATION SW 16TH STREET, RENTON, WA. Isso, i:iW a CO O u03 1 o :o 40 e ,f \ THE AUST I N WEST 1/4 CDR. SECTION 19-21-5 HOLMES ELECTRIC L...] I QV L. I SEATTLE LUMBER COMPANY C ION. 4 .cir czli: 2w 2 1 SW 16TH STREET 1027.81' -N 89. 35' 25" E PROPOSED 6' SIDEWALK 10' EASELENT 1'rr•'•'•'r'- iC7ljJ 1 •ii.T,l,e'4:i •i• vr--.ot, -- 240.1r— N 89. 35' 25" - .1 T., s p•. I EXIST. CONC. CUPS = +/`. 0 1ii t 41i 1Y 1.. :a-t7.07.%.0.+i•4 =i rai AD _.!Z•. .•.•••••pt•e•• 4 10' EASEMENTS i 1:1 11. 1..f.41' Ird p:p p rp•p• EXIST. 6' CONC. I}J.I KWANZAN CHERRY RED MAPLE 0 1F1 DECOAR CEDAR 0•p SIDEWALK 7' TO 8' H I,•p•4FT V2" CAL 2" CAL W w i ROCKSPRAY RHODODENDRON O n A M M N V N I COTONEASTER 1 na RHODODENDRON 1 'TO 8"e i4.,e,a n a 15" TO 18" (TYPICAL)CAL) r j i ly) iplev i PROPOSED a 115" TO 18"O w Iij'I IY ANZAN JAPANESE GROUND S j m• 6' SIDEWALK CHERRY SNOARROP COVER JAPANESE I •_ M' - NWI 01 0 O z PUGET POWER " i 2" GL O © 6 H AUTuw 6NOAH' DROP '2ING K .... • , - T` • h FLOAERING rR O4•• xx N ;4 00 ac-a SUBSTATION oa,rowl.CHERRY G•• L 14LO4 nOI GROIN) w t_t/2"CAL__ BUILDING -_ - , 1A. z' t"-4C-4 w I`I%' Q l0_#I Elvle alV.la_algo ao I ENTRANCE COW MAoalp7 I.•_1 0 81 %Qi a ceaDv!aDw'j S? ia a carom • • 3 Z i e PIN OAK EINHALNCEE:NT I. ' 8'TO 10'H v e vl 1 f COVER Or.1 N 0 co idle 2" GAL LANDSCAPING O a i w} oP"'' oln RANTER ) 110 rGROUP ¢ g • r., M K— O AUTUMN zm LANDSCAPE RHODODENDRON • i'I HEALTH Ct " X=0 I FLOWERING v SHRUBS ANDCOV 15" TO 18" OA( 01 11 24,.17' -N 89. 35' 25" E O, CHERRY I I GROUND COVER DECDAR CEDAR e.5N Z 7 DECOAR CE R I 1 1/2"CAL 7' TO 8' H d 7' TO 8' I,0'/"010 .O/O O'O iMerMfrioAomo..,I li 0di41_)0 OFFICE BUILDING COMPUTERjal0. I v FIN. FLR. EL. 21.50 JAPANESE 0•BOE I NG 1 ; x7vVuc 1i.; I HOLLY 4 r.O/ RHODODENDRON Ilit', 18°To 24"4 SERV I CES r4.:a^'$ 15" TO 18" m' ARISTRONG/4•4 I j.y RED MAPLE RHODODENDRON DECOAR CEDAR O I W`, AMPLE ,od s 10' E"EIENT 2" CAL 15"TO 18" 7' TO 8' H T 2" CAL ,m,10' GSEME I j e ,0 LAWN(TYP) A j LA (TYP) Z.4.71101.r mloxQEJ 140I IqM RgIrIpMfJI} l_71FKaTsirc114R_7 lam•er, 0 ..K%Pi •i GROUND KWANZAN CHERRY GIMP PIN OAK di 1 X11CHERRYCOVE 6 KWACALN CHERRY 2"GL CWER`II ) RHODODENDRONI'L9 2"GL ; YY 1 Ili 1 rKWANZAN i ts"To te" u' . AMP' RHODODENDRON RHODODENDRON ec, d+ 15' TO 18" 15"TO 18" a.J.LIN •: I RHODODENDRON RED MAPLE RHODODENDRON DECOAR CEDAR 15"TO 18" 1 I 4 2 CAL 15"TO 18" 7' TO 8' H 4 i : ae D ffivmdmdz:o_e t0ny0r 0r`0w.0_ .:..me 1%aOwAlowworAbwiRm-o wD wawoCrr imik s0w0v .0r 411 , 962..0. -N:'• 49' 0 'W 3 GUYS 120•APART VALLEY OFFICE PARK EXIST. 10' LANDSCAPING STRIP TURNBUCKLEII T A 2"X 2"X 24" 1SLJ6 IIL STAKES 4 6" SITE LANDSCAPING TOPSOIL AND YIN. 2' VARIES 31' TOTAL SITE AREA=JPING=.76 SO FT 2'-0" 6'-0" 1' 12'-0" VARIES TOTAL REO'D LANDSCAPING=76,665.60 SO FT I TWICE BALL' ACTUAL LANDSCAPING AREA=78,104.60 SO FT DIAMETER PERIIETER LANDSCAPING AREA=55,621.35 SO FT 24 19 TYPICAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL SECT I ON n INTERIOR LANDSCAPING AREA=20,949.95 SO FT SECT I ON /2%WILDLIFE ENHANCEIENT AREA=1533.30 SO FT 25 30 SCALE: NONE SCALE: NONE C-2 C-2 SCALE: NONE C-a C-4 T°NS DATE REV.S.C. IC CRS DATE RVIS.RI R C.0 EC 1"=40-0" pm I ANDSCAP I NG PLAN Goo I o.IN 89-5477 a THE AUSTIN COMPANY DATE 03-13-89 P.E, G.S.A.SKI C-4 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS O'P RAK ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS DATE XX-XX-B9 MPUTION SW 16TH STREET, RENTON, WA. MyI'' EE 00-l ' [Yn p yy11 II C13'-`—'.-._ ---9 --------- C) D . 0 C) 0 0 0 C) 0 0 cpc),mujC)c`" a__ 1,P.. 1 s 1,--A 0_ 1 11 1111 1111 . 11 11 1 I I IIIIII I I I 1i- I I 11111I 1•V_Alf-,1" ____,,,_. s..--- 3 EO PIA,rr . 1' I I I 1 I I I 1 •I I 1 I c1 • L_ 1II94 Z s41, I ma Fr. 1 PrL-r.-. IT r. - 1 H n_ 1 Er r- —k----- I 0 .JI—_ 1--1 c, 12- T H . L..t-_Y A.T 1 o kJ ............___. _____ ____________ if ILO N,I' - C".' rOCA...i..&• 1 I/140 c I.. C 0 0 CI)C.) 0 0 0 .0 0 t! 1 A I1 A_ IlfLE re__ i 4,33_.r‘o-rr. _ ns I I 14 1 i -4),, i •I I - I aocr..p.tr. .. T.: I I C) : I I t 741.21.itn_v_ 2.49_PUc.Pr 1 sr I It.4._."-1±2, qc 11:0 0V.M.A.Pte. . .. t0o.ruz.r.it LI T.I,-I _ '•L. V,6,1" i 0 i--1A.L.. : Iii,..." . 1. - c..k.L.c. 1. 1/16, 7. i' - cs'i THE AUSTIN I, MM. DATE ETYM.. EV CM= DA. AZYSE/ON DV CHM, El FVATIONS m.o.. 69-4413AC' INCALl 21 COMPANY DATE OEM EA CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS cur. X NOI CONSTRUCTOR* DATZ LOCATION PEWS 0 s9 C7 s 0 E F 0 u N L' cvG c CC A ce, TOP of PARA PIT IlIli T— s- n A I Bs:TN.FLaDRV-L,'.G• 11. ----'—•- a'-- i I' 11 1 g 11 O 1I I 4TH.FLaoR III 11. I I1 li fill . I I 3RD.LAIR 1.6 I C2ND.FLAIR I. I I17. I I I11:=D R0.. if, , fu . . « . I \ L____.i LLi__—J II D O BUILDING SECTION SGALC • Ye.I'-o' R e.o• C••• ••n 1.1.1•10“ NA' Mir an THE AUSTIN f e BUILDING SECTIONS 69-5477 COMPANY OAR A-15 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS CH CHOI CONSTRUCTORS ••n 1.0C•1104,1 e.•. I I 2 1 3 4 I S I P. o '- efi m 2 11) 4 5 12) 7 O ® = CQ IQCI A H I TEL aFARARr IJt/ 7l\,. 7 7 i'\i 7C/C //\/ I I+ 1IilllllLIIfA71 B5 TJI.BOOR5L.IGI'-6' I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 _ I f I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I'NN. li C—11 I.L L 1,4TN.FLOOR Q. V FL.147'-6' I i I I I .1. 1 1 1 1 I I-ll E. 0.• LI e SRP FLOOR fL.151-c.' t _ 1 1 1 1 i I I I i 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 l I I 1 I , ll ll ll ll ll I Cis T I I i 1 i t i GROUND 19LOO94r i. i i i D O BUILDING SECTION SCALE . 4e•I'•o• man• n 0 ••n IDIOM r C••• Q THE AUSTIN BUILDING SECTION o.,.. i-s477TM.. e COMPANY ••.. NST A— sCONSULTANTSARCHITECTS °MR' FORM NO.W&AK-142 Transamerica Title Insurance Company rNashington and Alaska Commitment—1986 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Transamerica Title Insurance Company, a California corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of:title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the exceptions and conditions and stipulations shown herein, the Exclusions from Coverage, the Schedule B exceptions, and the conditions and stipulations of the policy or policies requested. (See reverse side of this cover and inside of back cover for printed Exclusions from Coverage and Schedule B exceptions contained in various policy forms.) This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsements and is subject to the Conditions and Stipulations on the back of this cover. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF Transamerica Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. NOTE:THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THE COMMITMENT,AND A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM OR FORMS) REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WILL BE FURNISHED PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST. Transamerica Title Insurance CompanyPLANNINGDIVISIOr! CITY OF RENTON 1lE I M Q MAR 2 2 1989 f By a-<' o. President Sop l'J r By Secretary COMMITMENT CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien,encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failur,.e,to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter,the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed insured and such parties included under the definition of insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith, (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or(c)to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions, the Conditions and Stipu- lations, and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy: Appearing In ALTA Owners Policy—Form B Appearing in ALTA Loan Policy-19701.Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including 1.Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (includingbutnotlimitedtobuildingandzoningordinances)restricting but not limited to building and zoning ordinances)restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoy- or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoy-ment of the land,or regulating the character,dimensions or ment of the land,or regulating the character,dimensions orlocationofanyimprovementnoworhereaftererectedonlocationofanyimprovementnoworhereaftererectedon the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a re- the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a re-duction in the dimensions or area of the land,or the effect duction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law,ordinance or governmental of any violation of any such law,ordinance or governmental regulation. regulation. 2.Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police 2.Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. in the public records at Date of Policy. 3.Defects, liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other mat- 3.Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other mat- ters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the ters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by theinsuredclaimant; (b) not known to the Company and not insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company and notshownbythepublicrecordsbutknowntotheinsuredshownbythepublicrecordsbutknowntotheinsured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy and not acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy or acquired the insured mortgage and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder; c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy except to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or material or right thereto). 4. Unenforoeability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of failure of the insured at Date of Policy or of any subse- quent owner of the indebtedness to comply with applicable disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company doing business" laws of the state in which the land is prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured situated. hereunder;(c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value Continued on Inside Back Coverfortheestateorinterestinsuredbythispolicy. PLEASE DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: Transamerica No. : 0857314 Transamerica Title Insurance Co.Customer No. 320 108th Avenue N.E. Seller Valley Office P.O. Box 1493 Buyer/Borrower --- Bellevue, WA 98009deatoPreparedfor:By TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE CO. r Title Officer 1200 6TH AVENUE SEATTLE, WA 98101 For service on this order, call: ATTN: CAROL OHAIL 646-8589 JED CLAWSON, CINDY L. ESSER or JOHN W. JONES SCHEDULE A FOURTH COMMITMENT EFFECTIVE DATE: December 9, 1988 at 8:00 A.M. 1 . Policy or policies to be issued: Amount a) (X) Alta Owner's Policy (6-1-87) 1 ,500,000.00 Premium $ 3,045.00 Alta Owner's Policy-1970 Tax 246.65 Amended 10-17-70) Standard Policy Proposed Insured: NORTHWEST COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION b) (X) Alta Loan Policy (6-1-87) 14,400,000.00 Premium $15,345.00 Alta Loan Policy-1970 Tax 1 ,242.95 Amended 10-17-70) Proposed Insured: BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A. Total $19,879.60 2. Title to fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, AS TO THE SOUTHERLY 10 FEET OF LOT 1; AND VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK INCORPORATED, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, WHICH ACQUIRED TITLE AS METRO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT INC. , AS TO THE REMAINDER OF LOT I AND ALL OF LOTS 2 AND 3 SEE NOTE 2) 3. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the County of King, State of Washington and is described as follows : PARCEL A: LOTS 2 AND 3 OF VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK-SUBDIVISION NO. 1. ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8002269013; EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET PURPOSES BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 8007070464, 8008200077 AND 8202160354; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: LOT 1 OF VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK-SUBDIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8002269013; EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 240.06 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7907230679; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PAGE 2 0857314 SCHEDULE 6 EXCEPTIONS: Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Standard exceptions set forth on inside back cover. B. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. C. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. 1 . Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82.45 and subsequent amendments thereto. As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is .0159. 2. General taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: 1st half delinquent on May 1 ; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO. YEAR AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID PRINCIPAL BALANCE 972500-0751-06 1988 $168,711 .68 $168,711 .68 $ .00 Covers all of Lot l and other property) Said taxes are being carried on the tax rolls as operating property, which includes this and other property. 334040-4006-01 1988 $ 8,031 .69 $ 8,031 .69 $ .00 Covers Lot 2) 334040-4004-03 1988 $ 2,792.81 $ 2,792.81 $ .00 Covers Lot 3) Special taxes, as follows, .together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: 1st half delinquent on May 1 ; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO. YEAR AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID PRINCIPAL BALANCE 972500-0751-06 1988 $ 9.70 $ 9.70 $ 00 Covers all of Lot 1) 334040-4006-01 1988 $ 20.85 $20.85 $ .00 Covers Lot 2) PAGE 3 0857314 334040-4004-03 1988 $ 8.92 $ 8.92 $ .00 Covers Lot 3) The levy code for the property herein described is 2110 for 1988. 3. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation PURPOSE: Underground electric transmission and/or distribution system AREA AFFECTED: As stated therein DATED:August 24, 1979 RECORDED: February 1, 1980 RECORDING NO. : 8002010480 Covers Lots 2, 3 and 4) Contains covenant prohibiting structures over said easement or other activity which might endanger the underground system. Said easement is a re-record of the'easement recorded on September 7, 1979, under Recording No. 7909070696. 4. Easements , restrictions and recital set forth on the face of short plat recorded under King County Recording No. 8202269013. 5. Right granted to the Seattle Electric Company by C.D. Hillman and Bessie Olive Hillman, his wife, by instrument dated June 30, 1909, recorded under Recording No. 624312, to divert, appropriate or remove the. water running in the ditch or ditches located upon the plat of said addition. 6. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as granted to King County by deed recorded under Recording No. 8202160354. 7. MATTERS RELATED TO ALTA MORTGAGEE'S POLICY COVERAGE, AS DETERMINED BY OUR INSPECTION: a) Property improved by surveying and curb work. b) Possible outstanding lien rights arising from the improvements noted in paragraph (a) herein. Inquiry should be made of the Company to determine the requirements needed to clear this exception. c) No encroachments. d) Possible interest of parties in possession not disclosed of record, as evidenced by light poles and gravel parking area serving property on the South. e) We shall reinspect and report on remaining ALTA questions upon being informed the foundation forms area in place. PAGE 4 0857314 NOTE 1: The Company may have further requirements if the amount to be insured exceeds the current assessed valuation. NOTE 2: Any instrument should be executed in the name of Valley Office & Industrial Park Incorporated, who acquired title as Metro Industrial District Inc. , in order to impart constructive notice. END OF EXCEPTIONS INVESTIGATION SHOULD BE MADE TO DETERMINE IF THERE ARE ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE OR CONSTRUCTION CHARGES FOR SEWER, WATER OR ELECTRICITY. IN THE EVENT THIS TRANSACTION FAILS TO CLOSE, A CANCELLATION FEE WILL BE CHARGED:fOR SERVICES RENDERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR RATE SCHEDULE. JWJ/ga cc: BOGLE & GATES THE BANK OF CALIFORNIA CENTER SEATTLE, WA 98164 ATTN: KEVIN FAY . CC: BANK OF CALIFORNIA 910 FOURTH AVENUE; 4TH FLOOR SEATTLE, WASHINGTON ATTN: MARGARET NEUDORFER PAGE 5 0857314 r_ WOW Form*O.WA) 12 NO• J ,S • A. ' ROW NO.NO. LuAN NO. MORTGAGOR PLAT MAP Vol PG C 6.s u i - I•tsa. q. ' W y F . qi Yii M I fl..i T.r ..' :••;y a`i:r yM LC r: I i I r::. w. J M 51. .P r a.. r h,04 ' t e3 is LOT ... eg mm a I a f.'s i ,,-• LOT 3 1 ...... 1 • 0 10 Ic: t. ip AO*. REN SP 431-79-8002 69013 '1 0;1 11 A1 N.,•.ro4W I10N J0.4,-0/W 101•06 Ait.,O I.zl hiIs• t F.' v ,. i it oc ... I 2. 7.., •.I C .... II. gyp i I rani... 1 V '•' ft\.a..aar S IOIfJ 6' ST..,_. U IP+ i 1I. does ot ort to ow all s, roads or entsThismap no ishass dhforwvariations in dimensionsaandclocation.said property; liability TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMEN OF GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING RENTON, WA Prepared for: The Austin Company March 21, 1989 Prepared By: PLOING DIVISION The TRANSPO Group, Inc. DID OF RENTON14715Bel-Red Road, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98007 D BAR 2 2 I989 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 VICINITY STREET SYSTEM 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC AND TRANSIT SERVICE 6 PROJECT TRAFFIC ESTIMATES 6 Traffic Generation 6 Traffic Distribution 7 Discussion of Impacts 10 MITIGATING MEASURES 10 SUMMARY 11 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Site Location 2 2. Existing and Planned Street System 3 3. 2000 Total Traffic Forecast 5 4. Project Traffic Distribution 8 5. Site Access Traffic 9 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Austin Company proposes to construct an office building in the Renton Valley area on the site location illustrated on Figure 1. The site is located on the south side of SW 16th Street between Raymond and Lind Avenues SW, surrounding and excluding the Puget Power substation. The net site area is approximately 8.8 acres in land area. The proposed project is to construct an office building on the east half of the site providing 174,000 gross square feet (gsf) of floor area see Figure 1). The prospective tenant of the building will be the Federal Aviation Agency through the Government Service Administration -- a full building tenant. Occupancy is desired during 1990. The balance of the site will be used for surface parking of 800 to 850 vehicles. The site will be accessed via three access drives -- one drive each from Lind Avenue, SW 16th Street, and Raymond Avenue. The access drives will be located over 500 feet from the intersections of SW 16th Street with Lind and Raymond Avenues to minimize any future conflicts with signal queues at these intersections. VICINITY STREET SYSTEM The existing and planned street system in the project vicinity is illustrated on Figure 2. Lind and Oakesdale Avenues are the primary north-south arterial routes providing access to and through the Valley industrial area. Lind Avenue is a four-lane urban street with a fifth center turning lane at some locations. It has five lanes along most of the project site frontage but tapers down to four lanes in the vicinity of the southeast site corner. Its segment between SW 16th Street and Grady Way is currently closed and being widened to four and five lanes. Oakesdale Avenue was recently completed as a five-lane urban arterial north of Grady Way. It has two functioning lanes between SW 16th Street and Grady Way, with its ultimate five-lane section nearing completion. A southerly extension of Oakesdale Avenue between SW 16th and SW 31st Streets is planned as part of a forthcoming Valley-wide, LID program. 89225.00 The TRANSPO Group, Inc.Page 1 n North r.._,:j 0-............ A ";::;--' •.-LI-3=1/_F::::::_____----------* ....... _ ...... _.......-.1.1 r- ---••---) 1---•----- --77::::N.:: , i i rRI1gi_ 1_.•L,__.. J"•,L• CC.:" a1 J- 1: 7 - 4_‘_-_,,.- 13I. Ir :II•A..:...,.":.- s... z...". • \('. 7..'.. 1'-' fr l Oln1 . acri" I OCT.•Og iacif• %iI / 1 1 I rE.-, ni TI r—. ., .1 F__________[... ______i 1 I G 1,=.1 0 N s '.-•• 11 I 1 I 0 0 =1 ,...,........1. ; I III 1 I WI D 1'i•I IIi :tiworcott I i t.0 1 L ..31133 WieCt•••• 1 I 1 1.tac•-,-.-mlj:i ...-_— ,,i1i i ti 1 11 11 I I .f.' 6. ... ......j. .- .......... _.._ 1 II i I .. I ts%I FIGURE 1 The SITE LOCATION Tmnspo Grow on,P)c nn r e_ r•rs et EARUNOTOIt .''i GOLF j 1 7T > ST 1OURSE North w S PARK . w; 1,: . w. `i::=Z 8 RIDE J I ilr I s o I = SW 1°1K 5 S FIa. - S 51-cn R• 12TH 3lH 1 ei.•FRN sW QIllit liP 1o5 L ToSW 5L : Q. 1 T L 5L 3LQ5+.3L 3Lv w r P111 k: :T% fl- o O Site 4L Z. Q•a N cl r_ -. - onsac e s•C C ISL SW 191H ST 3EwRaree . -i„, 1 I in w SW 21 TS STVxjfE__ oi9te!al SW_,_ 23R0 ST S4‹ C Collector Arterial fm— i. J ' Z - 4Lao1= 11111IPlanned Arterial I t 7' c Existing SignalLAY-. :.- _„ : I J 1 Future Signal 1 1 II IIIIIII f11i11115U11111 111111111 — 3 SW 271u ST 3L S 2; irf 114 I Pill W 29TH sir t FIGURE 2 TheEXISTINGANDPLANNEDSTREETSYSTEMTranspo Group 89225.00 Tho TP MCDn rr .,., r.,,. n.,,,, 1 SW 16th Street is a three-lane collector street with mostly a rural type cross section (no curbs, sidewalks, or underground storm sewers). It currently operates with two lanes westbound and one lane eastbound. Upon completion of the Lind Avenue widening project, it is expected to be con- verted to one lane in each direction plus a two-way center left-turn lane. Its intersection with Lind Avenue has five lanes on all approaches. Because of the current temporary traffic detour conditions, SW 16th Street is operating at over-capacity conditions during peak hours in the morning and afternoon. These conditions will be relieved upon completion of the Lind Avenue widening project during the spring of 1989. Raymond Avenue is a completed 36-foot wide urban street from SW 16th Street to approximately SW 19th Street. It has underground storm drainage and sidewalks on both sides. Figure 3 illustrates the current and planned arterial street system for the Renton Valley area, together with estimates of 2000 traffic vol- umes. The 2000 traffic estimates reflect estimated buildout conditions for the Valley area. The estimates were prepared as part of the Valley Transportation Benefit Assessment District study completed by The TRANSPO Group in March 1988. The Valley road improvement plan calls for short-range improvements, including completion of the Lind Avenue and Oakesdale Avenue connections into the Valley from Grady Way; construction of Oakesdale Avenue from SW 16th to SW 31st Streets; and a new loop ramp and overcrossing structure widening at the SR 167/SW 43rd Street interchange. Longer range improvements include construction of SW 27th Street from Oakesdale Avenue to West Valley Highway and extension of Lind and Oakesdale Avenues from SW 43rd Street to East Valley Road. More localized collector street improvements are planned for Lind Avenue, Longview Avenue, Raymond Avenue, SW 16th Street, SW 19th Street, SW 34th Street, and SW 41st Street. 89225.00 The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Page 4 N 0 c n n CA n Co C N c = —+ i N.) arD sr f.7 1 fii, N 1 Y CD n c+ pay b ti P Ai*I N = 19,500 Ill 15rD (n 24.300 20o p CCD N 0 WEST YALLET IMY y4,500 t 27, u 1Jpp o rCDD c*20,900 D, tiS 0 a 8NRR d' 7 oe O 2400 Qi 1 S L0NGY1CN AY SW o s WII D 19,700 OARSOAIE AY SW r 27,700 II I 7 26,000 2 00 0.— 00 !OCoCb` e 12 r rl t17 o I y .. N, 1 • VnwJ9,you / a R11Ynono AV SW _( 8 5,1 % s Tl cOip m 8900 18,8001S,S00 2,700 lino AY SW 1a,600 14,000 3 D r 26,500 2,700 3 f O I/ A V 01 W ' N y V QQ 2i 8 25 T 8 8% I'. 16,200 EAST VALLEY RD 9900 6000 79,900 9J1200 / j! 0 lff 12,)00 Sa 161 102/1YAl00 r v.ao N 1 OZ,7p0 141CI4 1 1"1 r 0 g 8S a I 3o Completion of the Lind Avenue, 0akesdale Avenue, and SR 167/SW 43rd Street interchange improvements would provide sufficient Valley access capacity to accommodate up to 60 percent of potential Valley land use buildout. Completion of all planned road improvements would accommodate full buildout. EXISTING TRAFFIC AND TRANSIT SERVICE Because of the Lind Avenue/Oakesdale Avenue detour operation currently in effect, it was not realistic to collect and analyze existing traffic volumes and operating conditions in the project vicinity. When the Lind Avenue project is completed and the detour routing eliminated, highly acceptable traffic operating conditions are anticipated for the project vicinity. Two transit routes provide peak hour transit service past the project . site on Lind Avenue. Route 163 provides collection along the Benson Road corridor on East Hill , routes to and through the Renton Valley via Carr Road and Lind Avenue, and then travels on to downtown Seattle. Route 247 init- iates at the Redmond park-and-ride lot; makes stops at the Overlake, Eastgate, and 112th Street SE park-and-ride lots; and circulates through the Renton Valley via Lind Avenue to the Kent Space Center. PROJECT TRAFFIC ESTIMATES Traffic Generation Traffic generation of the proposed office project was estimated using formulas for a general office building as provided in Trip Generation Institute of Transportation Engineers, 4th Edition, 1987). The formulas relate estimated driveway trips to building floor area (A = 174,000 gsf). The formulas and resulting trip generation estimates are as follows: 89225.00 The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Page 6 Average Weekday Trips: Ln(T) = 0.75 Ln(A) + 3.77 = 2,100 AM Peak Hour Trips: Ln(T) = 0.86 Ln(A) + 1.34 = 320 280 trips inbound, 40 trips outbound) PM Peak Hour Trips: Ln(T) = 0.83 Ln(A) + 1.46 = 310 50 trips inbound, 260 trips outbound) About 15 percent of the 2,100 average weekday trips are estimated to occur each during the AM and PM commuter peak hours. Traffic Distribution The estimated distribution of project trips to the Valley freeway and arterial system is illustrated on Figure 4. This trip distribution esti- mate was prepared using the computer traffic model that was developed by TRANSPO as part of the Valley Transportation Benefit Assessment District Study. The distribution reflected the committed completion of Oakesdale Avenue from SW 16th to SW 31st Streets. Trips between the project site and the Southcenter area were assigned to the future SW 27th Street seg- ment between Oakesdale Avenue and West Valley Highway. Prior to such time that route is constructed, these trips would use Grady Way. The 150 trips per day assigned south on Oakesdale Avenue would use Lind Avenue prior to completion of 0akesdale. Figure 5 illustrates project traffic impacts and turning movements in the immediate site vicinity and at the three site access drives. The site traffic is expected to distribute fairly equally among the three access drives. 89225.00 The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Page 7 l y: z-:GOLf j. I ,,- - I s 7TH T S 7THI$T I orNcyURSE,,,:....„...,...........:,,,sPki".\z, 0,- rN.-‘1 North 11,0\c-i. 1 i,,....,.., ob. ...I. eb- A/0 ! FT D Itj z i. rfl d Sw IOSH Cr f 6 7 4 . `s so VILLAGE PL- M f J )y,y if'.. W N ` y 41...v.. ..` . `.04, y09r 9:-:.0,c.:.•-;:,.:.\ 44-'. ..4 6 8 ll vg"T. :ap _...." ii: _0\ 1' ,. 'ZQl I 2O., -3 0 s I. < # ~ 1511v 00igti 5 v,' ;._. _• 40;w 880 -4 u •-: a ST Ait 1 i ..y S 16TH ST s r. ` r' ` 51`i 0 — 1 10 2 0/ < m cn <y r%„r._®II tL •< 7~ I y = 2 S 17TH$T cc a- 7Lo n c es ; I sr: 1 mite W 19TH ST iiiiiii r; 1m y(4 i.V i 1 S N 19fH 0L. ST VnN•}W 6I .wr 4. I p N A co s4. . ZI • .:: Race n T•- I Cr 20TH f `-,+• ISST 1 g :ST.. :`,•- Iv A I I { ST F•. k >PL § WI..c_ U 0 F N 110 N r 1L o,N kHs 3 y ' ,; D ?cp.. W Trdc ' p 5 5I 7JZi IIbS 23 Di.S b y. '`-L ::., Z.;-1 1v 1 3W 23R ST R y r s.coo 1 ' 1 I I o ; i' aaK=.: 7^•- 1. a$IC ENlvI t II T I• ':,.F1 I I t S X5 Y Ne4 S+5' j` .l 528TH 1jr i a sau• :.`,ry III I:.+ 1111111/1/IIII(1(`IJWVTSTII 4. I m e l• a I . fii.'' 2 0 3 I o ,a I I s me Pi St4. o iy, • L•. W 29TH S t 4, • I. or-• a s d eta L4 ^ t W 315TI IdfNSE - 3„ CC C{R- NSELZ i s j s% W1`.t RD. ST i co r cc I cc 1 t^c'K i` 'a: t C 4 #1 Q I NTH ST I N 1 2 ^rj `*;. GG?. g III$- yy{; Sin °ST I I - -- - -S/tI 1.1. - - 4 7:0 s• 4i G' 118_TH lL D Q _-_ S 37TN sr. S PITHTH ST Y I ' i s :TTzit J I QI THjla $W K< 39TH ST S iA 0 !F ORe% N I 1 SW 41ST T I S 177TH CT 1 S q VALLEY 1 b Z; yt Vf\ I IA I GENERAL Ct s k , .y::. l. NI I I I HOSP•r <Z = 1 •g.. 1i1 v1 J to3RDr0 •. i 535 Average Weekday Volume ST • I tT C PP '''^ I - NI.10 7 PM Peak Hour Volumes I FIGURE 4 The PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION Transpo Group 89225.00 The TRANSPO Group, Inc.Pa OP 2 North 0 co rAo 50 CO sue110506 0 880) ` SW 16th St 20) 20 60 i5 r 25 50 35 50 Minor 10 0 10 6 r A. (74 r A ^PROJECT SITE 30 75 1? e) LLI I") 10 12 0 70 BOEING VALLEY OFFICE PARK 70 Y A XXX) Average Weekday Trips XX PM Peak Hour Trips XX by Direction FIGURE 5 The SITE ACCESS TRAFFIC Transpo Group 89225.00 The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Page 9 Discussion of Impacts Because of the current Oakesdale Avenue/Lind Avenue detour operation, it is not possible to establish a normal current condition against which to measure project traffic impacts. By comparing project traffic on Figure 3 against 2000 traffic forecasts on Figure 2, it is noted that the only street that would experience more than a 5 percent traffic increase is SW 16th Street between Lind and Oakesdale Avenues. Upon completion of the Lind Avenue expansion project, total traffic use of SW 16th Street is expected to drop to below 7,000 vehicle trips per day. An existing three- lane street has sufficient capacity to accommodate up to twice this traf- fic load. The project access drives along SW 16th Street and Raymond Avenue will operate satisfactorily with minimal delay to thru traffic volumes. The added project traffic at the intersection of Raymond Avenue and SW 16th Street is not expected to create any need or warrants for signal- ization. The' Lind Avenue access drive will not be serviced by a center left-turn lane on Lind Avenue. Left turns into the project site could cause some delay for thru traffic on Lind Avenue. However, during the AM peak hour when the highest volume of north-to-west left turns will occur, the northbound direction of traffic flow on Lind Avenue is light. During the PM peak period when northbound traffic flow on Lind Avenue is heavy, there will be very few northbound vehicles turning left into the site. MITIGATING MEASURES s Project access drives should be located no closer than 300 feet from the intersection of Lind Avenue and SW 16th Street (spacings of over 500 feet are currently proposed). SW 16th Street will have sufficient capacity to accommodate the added project traffic. It is presumed that the center lane on SW 16th Street will be converted to a two-way left-turn lane after the Lind Avenue bridge detour is concluded. 39225.00 The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Page 10 Though the project access drive on Lind Avenue will not neces- sitate a center left-turn lane, the applicant should allow suffi- cient right of way to allow future expansion of Lind Avenue to five lanes along that portion of Lind Avenue that is not cur- rently five lanes. SUMMARY The proposed office project is estimated to generate 2,100 vehicle trips per average weekday at full development and occupancy and 310 trips each during the morning and afternoon commuter peak hours. Initial occu- pancy is planned during 1990, and full occupancy may not occur until several years later. The project trips will be distributed among three site access drives one drive each on Lind Avenue, Raymond Avenue, and SW 16th Street there may be two access drives along Raymond Avenue). No mitigation will be necessitated by project traffic at these access drives or at other intersections in the project vicinity. However, the City of Renton desires to eventually expand Lind Avenue to five lanes from SW 16th Street to SW 41st Street. The project site plan should provide sufficient right of way to the City to accomplish this eventual widening need. SW 16th Street will have adequate capacity to accommodate the added project traffic after the current Lind Avenue/0akesdale Avenue detour is concluded. The Valley transportation plan calls for the eventual upgrad- ing of SW 16th Street to urban collector street standards (curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and illumination) . 89225.00 The TRANSPO Group, Inc.Page 11 FORM NO.W&AK-142 Transamerica Title Insurance Company Washington and Alaska Commitment—1986 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Transamerica Title Insurance Company, a California corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of tale insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the exceptions and conditions and stipulations shown herein, the Exclusions from Coverage, the Schedule B exceptions, and the conditions and stipulations of the policy or policies requested. (See reverse side of this cover and inside of back cover for printed Exclusions from Coverage and Schedule B exceptions contained in various policy forms.) This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsements and is subject to the Conditions and Stipulations on the back of this cover. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Transamerica Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. NOTE:THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THE COMMITMENT,AND A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM OR FORMS) REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WILL BE FURNISHED PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST. Transamerica Title Insurance Company By a-a„ President 111 , N E 3 0 Afq r •iq ° F j.. IBy Secretary COMMITMENT CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter,the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed insured and such parties included under the definition of insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual lossincurredinreliancehereoninundertakingingoodfaith, (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or(c)to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions, the Conditions and Stipu- lations, and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expresslymodifiedherein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy: Appearing in ALTA Owners Policy—Form B Appearing In ALTA Loan Policy-19701.Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including 1.Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (includingbutnotlimitedtobuildingandzoningordinances)restricting but not limited to building and zoning ordinances)restrictingorregulatingorprohibitingtheoccupancy, use or enjoy- or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoy-ment of the land,or regulating the character,dimensions or ment of the land,or regulating the character,dimensions orlocationofanyimprovementnoworhereaftererectedonlocationofanyimprovementnoworhereaftererectedontheland, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a re- the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a re-duction in the dimensions or area of the land,or the effect duction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the effectofanyviolationofanysuchlaw,ordinance or governmental of any violation of any such law,ordinance or governmentalregulation. regulation. 2.'Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police 2.Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of policepowerunlessnoticeoftheexerciseofsuchrightsappearspowerunlessnoticeoftheexerciseofsuchrightsappearsinthepublicrecordsatDateofPolicy. in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects, liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other mat- 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other mat-ters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the ters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by theinsuredclaimant; (b) not known to the Company and not insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company and notshownbythepublicrecordsbutknowntotheinsuredshownbythepublicrecordsbutknowntotheinsuredclaimanteitheratDateofPokyoratthedatesuchclaimantclaimanteitheratDateofPolicyoratthedatesuchclaimantacquiredanestateorinterestinsuredbythispolicyandnotacquiredanestateorinterestinsuredbythispolicyor acquired the insured mortgage and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder; c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy except to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or material or right thereto). 4.Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of failure of the insured at Date of Policy or of any subse- quent owner of the indebtedness to comply with applicable disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company doing business" laws of the state in which the land is prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured situated. hereunder;(c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value Continued on Inside Back Coverfortheestateorinterestinsuredbythispolicy. PLEASE DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO: Transamerica No. : 0857314 Transamerica Title Insurance Co.Customer No. 320 108th Avenue N.E. Seller Valley Office P.O. Box 1493 Buyer/Borrower --- Bellevue, WA 98009 dejko_.Prepared for:By a, ' TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE CO. r Title Officer 1200 6TH AVENUE SEATTLE, WA 98101 For service on this order, call: ATTN: CAROL OHAIL 646-8589 JED CLAWSON, CINDY L. ESSER or JOHN W. JONES SCHEDULE A FOURTH COMMITMENT EFFECTIVE DATE: December 9, 1988 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or policies to be issued: Amount a) (X) Alta Owner's Policy (6-1-87) 1,500,000.00 Premium $ 3,045.00 Alta Owner's Policy-1970 Tax 246.65 Amended 10-17-70) Standard Policy Proposed Insured: NORTHWEST COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION b) (X) Alta Loan Policy (6-1-87) 14,400,000.00 Premium $15,345.00 Alta Loan Policy-1970 Tax 1 ,242.95 Amended 10-17-70) Proposed Insured: BANK OF CALIFORNIA, N.A. Total $19,879.60 2. Title to fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, AS TO THE SOUTHERLY 10 FEET OF LOT 1; AND VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARR INCORPORATED, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, WHICH ACQUIRED TITLE AS METRO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT INC. , AS TO THE REMAINDER OF LOT 1 AND ALL OF LOTS 2 AND 3 SEE NOTE 2) 3. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the County of King, State of Washington and is described as follows: PARCEL A: LOTS 2 AND 3 OF VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK-SUBDIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8002269013; EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET PURPOSES BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 8007070464, 8008200077 AND 8202160354; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: LOT 1 OF VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK-SUBDIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8002269013; EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 240.06 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7907230679; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PAGE 2 0857314 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS: Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Standard exceptions set forth on inside back cover. B. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. C. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. 1 . Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82.45 and subsequent amendments thereto. As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is .0159. 2. General taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: 1st half delinquent on May 1 ; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO. YEAR AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID PRINCIPAL BALANCE 972500-0751-06 1988 $168,711 .68 $168,711 .68 $ .00 Covers all of Lot 1 and other property) Said taxes are being carried on the tax rolls as operating property, which includes this and other property. 334040-4006-01 1988 $ 8,031 .69 $ 8,031 .69 $ .00 Covers Lot 2) 334040-4004-03 1988 $ 2,792.81 $ 2,792.81 $ .00 Covers Lot 3) Special taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: 1st half delinquent on May 1 ; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO. YEAR AMOUNT BILLED AMOUNT PAID PRINCIPAL BALANCE 972500-0751-06 1988 $ 9.70 $ 9.70 $ 00 Covers all of Lot 1) 334040-4006-01 1988 $ 20.85 $ 20.85 $ .00 Covers Lot 2) PAGE 3 0857314 334040-4004-03 1988 $ 8.92 $ 8.92 $ .00 Covers Lot 3) The levy code for the property herein described is 2110 for 1988. 3. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation PURPOSE: Underground electric transmission and/or distribution system AREA AFFECTED: As stated therein DATED:August 24, 1979 RECORDED: February 1, 1980 RECORDING NO. : 8002010480 Covers Lots 2, 3 and 4) Contains covenant prohibiting structures over said easement or other activity which might endanger the underground system. Said easement. is a re-record of the easement recorded on September 7, 1979, under Recording No. 7909070696. 4. Easements, restrictions and recital set forth on the face of short plat recorded under King County Recording No. 8202269013. 5. Right granted to the Seattle Electric Company by C.D. Hillman and Bessie Olive Hillman, his wife, by instrument dated June 30, 1909, recorded under RecordingNo. 624312, to divert, appropriate or remove the water running in the ditch or ditches located upon the plat of said addition. 6. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as granted to King County by deed recorded under Recording No. 8202160354. 7. MATTERS RELATED TO ALTA MORTGAGEE'S POLICY COVERAGE, AS DETERMINED BY OUR INSPECTION: a) Property improved by surveying and curb work. b) Possible outstanding lien rights arising from the improvements noted in paragraph (a) herein. Inquiry should be made of the Company to determine the requirements needed to clear this exception. c) No encroachments. d) Possible interest of parties in possession not disclosed of record, as evidenced by light poles and gravel parking area serving property on the South. e) We shall reinspect and report on remaining ALTA questions upon being informed the foundation forms area in place. PAGE 4 0857314 NOTE 1: The Company may have further requirements if the amount to be insured exceeds the current assessed valuation. NOTE 2: Any instrument should be executed in the name of Valley Office & Industrial Park Incorporated, who acquired title as Metro Industrial District Inc. , in order to impart constructive notice. END OF EXCEPTIONS INVESTIGATION SHOULD BE MADE TO DETERMINE IF THERE ARE ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE OR CONSTRUCTION CHARGES FOR SEWER, WATER OR ELECTRICITY. IN THE EVENT THIS TRANSACTION FAILS TO CLOSE, A CANCELLATION FEE WILL BE CHARGED:fOR SERVICES RENDERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR RATE SCHEDULE. JWJ/ga cc: BOGLE & GATES THE BANK OF CALIFORNIA CENTER SEATTLE, WA 98164 ATTN: KEVIN FAY CC: BANK OF CALIFORNIA 910 FOURTH AVENUE, 4TH FLOOR SEATTLE, WASHINGTON ATTN: MARGARET NEUDORFER PAGE 5 0857314 so F. No.In). ... • r'TER NO. TS 7,3 i 44 prow orza 1, 1 — ROW NO. LuAN NO. MORTGAGOR PLAT MAP Vol PG Ili•i3.. .19,..._..._....5....vv I 16 Th. ST • • t.t. I dok ,I.,.,.?,I..*****ill.iiolied.O.r.o: .!. • 4-- 47-7 -7-777,0707.- ' • • ,,..---7-17 , .hti. • it011IvorA !..4.5 Pin9•Jur•Aga ittiri, 1. W 0 . ill' •. ill.i!... -. ****.. .... . 2 ...../._....4.1.............„ 01- '"7 1. 1. ..... 6.: 3. i!,:o.::•• ° 4- i 1.4" Tarcgi.,1). - • - . • • i ,45.5 Lc r 1 ••• . • 1 4. 5 4 E5 er'i• 'PArawk 1. !!; 1k.. 00 .\3 1. '. 11i .1 .. • 3 fs.,....... •NOX4, k i2 . w) fi::::. LOT.;2. • . 47, I V• ......- 1 • •. a 1 • • TarCC I •' et •• • . Li . .51 • • . 11 r.•:,* • 1:".''•" • la LOT 3 1 . t..10 1.9 9 i. ICI Ao"' REN SP 431-79-8002 69013 ' Aou'ip . 11. .. • . NIP••011•04W 460 SI JIP.,,g,-INW .1422.1:* ail.Ve 1!..7, ihe,.,..,,„,,„,,,,,,,,, Amc:Lmog e••••• . . 13 i.:3 .. . .... ....... 13° . .°,1 I • oil sq. ZSI ;..I.!.. I 1... ...'...,............... ......... .. . . ... : 1.21 . .... I IL . ‘ • 5 I • ' . 4.3 P.::: W.; 2' • _, 4''.3!. . 2 4. r 0• I t •1 •••••ri *.. 1 i. •1E. . 11; 1. 41) 1 LAT 4 :•••i• I F:1•. . o',..? . ..... 1 • t:313 RI tt 3F...I i 1 ••• •• dor." f4e••.. •• Li 37 ft 3.7 ,00r 2..; i i.• 1•< vz • fiii;• 3 Z '..'.Y*;•; o ''. 1 :...,. . . ... . . .;..... .. Z 35 ... . 2.1. .... ..,.:P.-.• 2.f t 1 b. 1; t ;;•'; : . • 1.':', r •, 0 33 - . • i•:.('s 3•4•1 2.,;i 140? . 1 ii% 40,2 I ti. 1 :: .' • 4.'.'.4 t• 31 y 0 .• '. . 3 31 •21' i 4 I : 1.. 1' 30 • . ' . . fi,, ;,,,d, \..sh.• vt••••••os-tow 01• at •is :?:! V. i . 155 6 ST.Ii.".„ A r 0 ' I ^Sao.•••Wm.., 119M.59 I. 1 .11. rills map does not purport to show all highways, roads or easements affecting aid property; no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location. 22-182 VALLEY OFFICE a INDUSTRIAL PARK — SUBDIVISION NO. I IN THE NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4, SECTION 19 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. CERTIFICATE RENTON, KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE UNDERSIGNED, ARE THE OMERIS) IN FEE SIMPLE OF THE LAND HEREBY PLATTED IN THIS SHOAT FLAT. 43/-T9 RETRO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, 1NCffiF/F' • JNORTHWESTCOMMERCIALREAL(STATE CAI. PyfylPUGETSOUNDPOWERIILIGHTCOMPANYGi CITY OF RENTON $MA.^r ki.SFuwp•ORF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON U. COUNTY OF KIND THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS aaJkuiv OF .3w w A.D. 9 10 BEFOREHE THE UNDERSIGNED, &NOTARY PUBLIC, MR V 1, APPEARED P., 5• (2,i ... TO HIE NNONN TO BE THE INDIVIDUALIS) WHO SrrGNIED THE MOVE CERTIFICATE AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO HIE THAT Mt SIGNED THE SAM AS_LFREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED. WITNESS MY NAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING ATS..$k • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON SS. COUNTY OF KING THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS,ALDAY OF S RTWEIII4 A.D. 1910BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, A WEARS PULIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED_ LCS\.f. R. tt.MMe . TO HE KNOWN TO BE THE INDIVIDUAL(S) WFO SIGNED THE ABOVE CERTIFICATE AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT_hip., SIGNED THE SAME AS his FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I,S.fIP+A if. ANA Nis MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A S.:.E• *WAW B• -E OR UNDER ROTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH.--( :EG.:R(..ENT OF T..E APPROVALS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT WASHINGTON RESIDING AT L1....41.SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST E,ArINED AND APPROVED TNIS /DAr of :..r.-f A.D. 19's METRO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, INC. e •STATE OF WASHINGTON ' I i RUNTY OF KING SS'l rw' -- DIRECTOR. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THISZO11DAr OF FEBRUNRY A.D. CERTIFICATE No. 7172 EAAMINED AND APPROVED TNIS !w DAY OF r/:/)nF, A.D. 19g119RDBEFOREMETHE``UNDERSIGNED. A NOTARY PUBLIC./ PERSONALLY EKPIPATION DATE 5-6-SO 1'' APPEARED_.!AT.•• q. SII;NpoLlL - - - - t,f TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE INDIVTDUALISI WHO SIGNED THE ABOVE RECORDING CERTIFICATECERTIFICATEANDACKNOWLEDGEDTOMETHATtfi6SIGNEDTHESAME 800226 9013 NTT.RAFF IC ENGINEER AS haft FREE AND /OLUNTAPY ACT AND DEED.Y.A.D. EKMINED,AND APPROVED THIS ZO rDAY OF F Na. A.D. 19eb WITNESS Mr HANG AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAr AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE FILED FOR RECORD THIS Z6 OM OF Fes. WRITTEN. 1980. AT.1iM., IN BOOK 22 of SURVEYS ON PAGE/8ZI/8Z•4:/82-8 AT THE REQUEST oF_R. F.._MILLPOINTERNING CsprJR. LAND THE CITY OH RENTON. EKMINED AND APPROVED THIS ZS.DA, OF FE. 1 A.C. 198° NOTARY PUBLIC FOR THE STATE OF CLINJ fs LSOM--__ JAMELL.WE![7 _ _Gi.itiA' G N.,,4^'""'z- Ii E WASHINGTON RESIDING AT %YjT A_ .PANAGER SUPERINTENDENT OF RECORDS DEPUTY COUNTY ASSESSo KI COUN Y ASSESSOR l' 4 na/?-Mil f.WCo'DI,f - 0 - ate" . 'dl effiwisimieljiSHEETIOF3 VALLEY OFFICE li INDUSTRIAL PARK - SUBDIVISION NO. I 22-182-A IN THE NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4, SECTION 19 TOWNSHIP 23 • NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PROPERTY DESCRIPTION All of +seated 81.,;ks 71 and ii and vacated Valentine Avenuehens•. set; al:_..,, of C. D. Hillman's Earlington GardenAdJiti„i. to :.a City of Seattle. Division No. I, according EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUNDt. pot re rued :t Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, in Kingfnor.iv. W.i.,. ,Yto,,, lying South of the South margin of ELECTRIC SYSTEMuut.. ., nth direct; N..0 idle M:iN t ,at purcion of Raymond Avenue Southwest And AFNL"',' Avenue .ovcnvesc An conveyed to City of Renton by Deeds 8002010480 WATER LINE EASEMENTre,Jried ender Klee Co met' Recording Nos. 7907230679,7.._.,,,.:,° e'd 7aoiU7i0GY adjoining said Blocks 0246 and 11. scrip if land IS feet in width lying 7,5 feet on eachPROPERTYDESCRIPTION: i. of a centerline described as follows:All of Blocks 24 and 74, Including vacated streets InNOTE: A SEPARATE EASEMENT RECOR.DED C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Division No. 1, as Odegffice an at a point on the east line of Lot 4 of ValleySEERcCNo.BOOZ z60 T/7 recorded In Book of Plats in Volume 17, page 71, King Office end Industrial Park Subdivision No. 1, lying inComity, Washington, EXCEPT rend, deeded to the City of the N141/1 of the SW1/4, Section 19, Township 21 North,Renton: Range 5 East M.M. King County, Washington, which point isS12U'16•W J27.04 fret from the northeast cornerANDALSOEKCErTHEFOLL3WINGDESCRIBEDPROPERTY: thereof; thence NB9°/Y'O1'W 144.65 feet to a pointhereinafterreferredtoaspointA'; thence SO°10'59•W87.0 cart to .SIDE WALK EASEMENT Tne north 27 feet of Lots 6 aid Si, and Lots 1 through 5 and point hereinafter referred to as pointLots54through58, Block 31, C. D. Hillman's Earlington B'; thence SO 10'59'W 170,0 feet co a point hereinafterGardensAdditionDivisionNo. 1, according to plat recorded referred to as point 'C•i •Dent• NBi°1Y'Ont 341.0 feetThehart' 6.0 feet of Lot 1 in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, in King County, Washington; to c po:nt hereinaftert referred to as point '0'; thenceTOGETHERWITHthewest12feetofvacated86thAvenueSouthNBY1Y•Ol'M 11the feet to a point hereinaftereti referred toadjoiningLots1through5andportionofLot6.as point 'E•1 thence NB9°19.01•W 15.0 feet: thence NO°10'59'E 344.0 feet to a point hereinafter referred toLocatedwdinSouthwest1/4 Section 19, Township 23 as point ape: thence NO°10.59'E 41.0 feet to a pointNorth, Range the Bast W.N. hereinafter referred to as point - ; thence NO 10'S9•E100.0 feet to • point hereinafter referred tg19'Ol•EaspointThenorth10feetadjoiningtiesouthmarginof !. W. 16th N ; thence NO 10'S9•E 15.0 feet: thence S09 UTILITY EASEMENT Street and tar east 10 feet and the south 13 err[, and the 172.0 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as pointmostwesterly10feetoftheabovedescribedpropert51. I•: thence 589°49'01'E 198.0 feet to a point hereinafterreferredpaaspoint •J': thence 589°49'01'E 112.0 feet;AND ALSO, Rights of Way 10 feet an width having 5 feet of then_, 50 10'59'W 10.0 feet to a point hereinafter rred The 'Korth 1..0 feet. of Lot 1 such width on each side of tie following described hetie afar to as point 'K•: them SO 10'S9'N 275.0 feet tocenterlines: t aforementioned point 'A'. 1. Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Lind Together with the following described branch seamen u;Avenue S. W. and S. W. 19th Street; thence N89°49'ul'WalongthecenterlineofS. W. 19th , 229 feet;By indiny at the aforementioned point 'B•, thencethenceNO°IO'S9'E 30 feet to eels south line of ore abuvr S89°49'0:•E 27.5 feet: described property and the true point of beginning;thence continuing NO°10'59'E 149 feet to the tannin,. of Beginning at the aforementionedpoint •C•, thenceLANDSCAPEEASEMENTthiscenterlinedescription; SU°IU'S9•W 20.0 feet, thenceeS89°589°49'01'E 27.5 feet: 2. Bey inning at the Intoruetlon of the centerlines of Lind Beginning •t the aforoeetioned point •D', thenceThesoots10.0 feet of the notch Avenue S. W. and S. W. 19th Street; thence N89°49'01'M SO°IU'SY'M 27,5 (set: along the centerline of S. W. 19tit , 645 feet;thence 11O°10.59"E 30 feet to the south line of the above deg inning st the •forementfoned point •E', thence20.0 feet of Lot I. described property and the true point of beginning;SO°l0'SY'W 27.5 [nett thence continuing NO°10'S9'E 18J feet to the terminus of Bag inning at the aforementioned paint 'I'', thencethiscenterlinedescription; 589 19'01•E 27.5 feet:3. Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of S.W. SEWER EASEMENT 19th street and the west section line of said Section Bayfnniny at the aforementioned point `G', thence19; thence NO°47.29`E along said section line 539 tart; NBY 19•J:'M 311.35 [art to the east margin of RaymondthenceS89°/9•01•E 20 feet to the rest line of the above Ave. S.M.: descriBeginningattheIntersectionofthewestmarginextendedofthencecontinuing prouingy5and the01'Etrue350 feet of to beginning;ea./inningterminusLindAve. S. N. and the north margin extended of S. W. 19th of the centerline description; at the aforementioned point `N', thenceSt.; thence N89°/9'01'W along the said north margin of S. W. 4SBY°y9'Jl' E 27.5 feet;19th St. 34.30 feet to the point of curvature of the corner 4. Beginning at the Intersection of the centerlines of Lind eryinniny at tile aforementioned on point 'I', thenceradiosandthetruepointofbeginning; thence northeasterly Avenue S. W. end S. W. 19th Street; thence NOl°20.16'E NU°:. Si•E 12.J1 feet to a point the north boundary ofalongacurvetothelett, having a radios of 35.00 feet sail Lot 1:through a central angle of BB°50'1]' an arc distance of along the centerline of Lind W. 585.5 feet;54.27 feet545ceo the point of tangency8° '43 of the corneri radius; i thence N88°79'11`W 10 feet to the east line of the abo ethence to W 49.00 feet to the true point of begin-described property and the true point of beginning; Y lag inning at the aforementioned point 'J', thence 9 39•44•W 17U feet to the terminus SO :U•SY'M 27.5 feet:nine. i thence continuing NBB of tees centerline description. ieginning at the aforementioned point 'K•, thence S81•'12'01'E 27.5 tees. SHEET 2 OF 3 8002269013 JET /a COOL SEC ,9 Cd1bl..c, "10r. n GAC. 2' 27 w ice_ r 5. g102iJA.-C EA'G•--'1tNT 1Q26.79 j j 1.7 7 --- 9 I I LT'T' C.e.jE,iENr Se-ft V.IL oN I- i IlI \ I Exl-n T[16 n 4 E I.9 o II I S..1 16 Tw. 9T. _ Sc ,027.6' - N 69''5! 25' E _- o/ w B9 s 2S E o 51 5•. 04 10.01 r. i 21' 5.'' e r, 09D.43I-- 52 94 59' -' 25' E J 2.4 i- ----- -- - r I l jil I Ir -g OI 01 5.00 5 I• 22 55 w 45'!.41 - 114.i2 i Tn\-/49.L ARE/ 40 • p- - A - 86 47 54 A - 9i / Si' - n.0723067! I in R - 22.52 V 6 - 99.00 n r".- 2T .44 O 0 9G.08 m 4 L - 55.02 IS I.. - 56.05 - 10NC2.5 AC n C-I N 11 0 NCI = N 69-` 210. O n . 40 `a VALLEY OFFI E a INDUSTRIAL PARK uz i 5.5 3 SUBDIIVISION NO.+ AJb.: A S nO e r IN THE NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4, SECTION 19aa2.9 AC. n N r 0 I y r N TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.3 N C9 49' 01 w N OS'491 of w Z 10 n 46O.04 502.u6 It Q '- I 962.90 4 I J it;w I r 1 3 Illo-a 416 > r p J n,j n n41 z n 0:: 0• _ 0 n a4nfflmwmmwo a z - z LEGEND T I 46j 1 J r : . - Z I v• im`""- EX.S nG--CO.G "OPI * 15-0 Ac. Y'2 0 , ./2 .e.Et,.ArL F 1111111 roo..,ER EiEtirI. ,/i WATER. EASE"E: •z P 40 40 J N li=7 SENCI[E1 Ste.-:C\ ! z N r, S DEwA-K 4 U'L. ' eASE- eN. of - N a L,Wo:.aE esa1.It- in, - 11Zt11iTSS1»11UZll c_ e«EI less-sKf =o e! r 1 Lill C0 • 'ED -, A y'^I - L- 90. 56' 5o' wo.TE4 EASEMGNTJ S T. R - 55-oo roET souno o `e5 A - 05 50 45'I 1 - L = 55. 57 POwER EA' Er"I9NT R - '05.00 75 AFN noo2oio4Bo I. T - 54.50 ISS 0 Ill a i i 1 ni II 1 I1 L o 94.27 O 5. W. 19 TII 6T 1056 41 yp09tyIo16.IS tY t-rN4 GrTy' OF RENTON-' \--1950.4 v.r e N ere 49' or. W INT.R3lGTION UUS 16 6OUT.IdtotG1.5 4 LAST 0.0 1 9 I P'd ftEr elin i ,*:n I 0.0 Jeer rower. espir r a.% % 11 1oo5.aG 4C-0_ 1529.04 25 I 50 N 55' 52' S0 w 255 2. 54 t R-- 1 SHEET 3 OF 3 r1" ECORDED TO CORRECT LEGAL DESCRIP ' IN 1. 3 2 i 3 of EXHIBIT "A" P1/GET EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC S RECORDED THIS DAY o rER E 7 n 31 AN'T'4DIV x 4VTi'_DIVISI.4 OF kECOROS b El EC(IONS •METRO .NDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, INC. KIfl3 COUNTY le NORTHWEST COI.MERCIAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY, INC. r- AV Grantor"herein),grants,conveys and warrants to PUGET SOUND POWER a LIGHT COM.PAN`' a Washington cor- porat'.on r'Grantee"herein),for the purposes hereinafter set forth a perpetual easement under.acrcss and over the fol- lowing described real property(the"Property"herein)King County.Washington. All of Blocks 24 and 31, including vacated streets in C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Division No. 1, as recorded in Bock of Plats in Volume 17, page 74, King County, Washington; EXCEPT roads deeded to the City of o-, Renton; a AND ALSO EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PRO?E:2TY: The north 27 feet of Lots 6 and 53, and Lots 1 through 5 and Lots 0 54 through 58, Block 31, C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition N Division No. 1, according to plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the west 12 feet of vacated 86th Avenue South adjoiningtiLots1through5andportionofLot6. r Located in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. a Except as may be otherwise set forth herein Grantees rights shall be exercised upon that portion of the Property(the"Right- 1 of Way"herein)described as follows: j I hiilgblQi-&Dx terItu.wWW.bmin° f..enf such avidth.o -adisida.ofaearito& li-- --„ Jelbwa The Legal Description of said Right—of—Way is attached hereto as y- CD A", and incorporated herein by this reference. 4 00 Grantor reserves a right to use said Right-of-Way for other utility installation. 1 0 Grantor reserves the right to relocate all or any portion of said Right-of-Way and installations located therein at Grantor's expense. Grantee agrees not to unr-asor, bly restrict access to the property in connection with Grantee's exercise 0 of Right-of-Way. 1. Purpose.Grantee shall have the right to construct.operate,maintain,repair,replace a.it....large an undergr..4..1 electric • transmission and/or distribution system upon and under the Right-of-Way together with all necessity or convenient ap.purtenances therefor.which may include but are not limited to the following:underground conduits,cables,communicationlines:vaults.manholes,switches,and transformers:and semi-buried or ground mounted facilities.Following the Initial con- m struction of its facilities.Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as it may require. 1 Access,Grantee shall have the right of access to the Right•of-Way over and across the Property to enableGrantee to exec-rill.its rights hereunder.provided.that Grantee shall compensateGrantor for any damage tothePropertycaused by the exer-IIIIIIIII IA dse of said right r.'access. i\ L Obstr+dfons:Laodseapi g.Grantee may from time to time remove trees,bushes,or other obstructions within the Night- i of-Way and may level and grade the Right-of-Way to the extent reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes act forth Inkilparagraph1hereof,provided,that following any such work.Grantee shall,to the extent reasonably practiable,restore the iv, Right-of-Way to the condition It was immediately prior to such work.Following the installation of Grantee's underground I\f facilities.Grantor may undertake anyordinary improvements to the landscaping ofthe Right-of-Way.provided thatno trees orhotherplants,shell be placed thereon which would be unreasonably expensive or Impractical for Grantee to remove and Q restore. 4.&smooth Use of RI Id W .Grantor reserves the right to use the Right-of-Way for any purpose not Inconsistent with the rights herein granted. that Grantor shall not construct or maintain any building or other structure on the Right-of-Way which would Interfere with the exercise of the rights herein granted:that no digging,tunneling or other form of con-struction activity shall be done on the Property which would disturb the compaction o-unearth Grantee's facilities on the Rightof-Way,or endanger the lateral support tosaid facilities:and that no blasting shell be done within 15 feet of the Right-of-Way. . R Istivardty.By accepting and recording this easement.Grantee agrees to Indemnify and hold harmless Grantor from anyandalldabnsfarInjuriesand/or damages suffered by any person which may be caused by the Grantee's exercise d the rightsbardsshallthatGranteenotberesponsibletoGrantorforanyInjuriesand/or damages its any personcausedbyadsormadamofGrantor. a AbaedemeenL The rights herein granted shall continue until such time as Grantee ceases to use the Rightof-Way for aperiodoffive(S)suaoadve years.In which event this easement shall terminate and all rights hereunder shall revert to Grea- ter,provided that no abandonment shall be deemed to have occurred by reason of Grantee's failure to Initially Install ItsfaduileeontheRight-of-Way within any period of time from the date hereof.v I.Bow eassseawsts Melons rights and oblt•.•:Ions of the parties shell inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their s and assigns. v R-1158 FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF;e XJ/48 • PUGET POWlA DIVISION King fJ(CIS? fAX NOT RFQI 436791 REAL ESTATE D PIMP 149 235/75 PUGET POW BLDG.Kula CI' Record: is i' ER S UA A)L WASHINGTON SSOOS ...9iii Deputy ATTENTION: WAYNE BREMEi1 r fl,DATED this 4 day of G,..5 u S- 19 19f GRANTOR METRO I UST DISTRICT, list:. 8 a . t NORI ERCIAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY, INC. i Byt ti- STATE OF WASHINGTON I SS Washington O STATE OF CO King jai.OCounty of Z; • C On thia_2.4th day of August A. D. 19Jg, before me, the under-1`:: , N signed,a Notary Public in and for the St to of Waahington duly commissioned a.id sworn pers:m.11y appeared Psut S. Chl8do and co to me known to be th. Vice President and Secretary,respectively,ofNORTHWESTCOMMERCIALREALESTATECOMPANY- INC_ List V!t!Vl atlV!!ti,.i ' .4 the forci;aing iritr rozot. on.:achnot•Acd.Cd tic zoie.i to be ti:free •': d h:r.t4 J tary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes there::: mentioned, and on oath stated that—he authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said f •- corporation. E WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. 1 N...,./Public ii.ed is,A.State.f._Walihington__ r.idiaa.,t Seattle__--- r ' STATE OF Washington County of King la& On this 24 th day of Auvus t A.D. a Yl,before me, the under- signed.a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared Paul S_ hi ado and to me known to be the Vice President and Secretary,respectively.ofMETROINDUSTRIALDISTRICT, INC. the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and volun• tary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned• and on oath stated that_he i a authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate allove written. 1 D a.. t Notary Pabli.to.ad 7.r tL.State.f liashin t]n I as a, Seattle i Askaewhigeb.at b7 Corporation.Tioo..t National Tills lasuraoes Co.Form I.29) STATE OF WASHINGTON I SS CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENTCOUNTYOFKingI th 24 le14 .before me.the undanigned,personally appearedI. ithaetonnacnie August 1 end t,.ma known to be the Vice Pros-r and respectively.ofINI+TRfl INI]1.STRTAL 1]TSTRTCT. INC- the carporeMon that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein s. mentioned and on oath stated that M tss authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal o/said mrporatlon t i Witnessmy .and and official seal hereto affixed the day year first above written. 1 Notary Pubiie and for the Slate of W'.:hingten. re.:.in g a s EXHIBIT "A" en; The north 10 feet adjoining the south margin of T. W. 16th Street and the east 10 feet and the south 10 feet, and the most westerly 10 feet of the above described property. O A}' ALSO, Rights of Way 10 feet in width having 5 feet of such width on each side of the following describedocenterlines: p 1. Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines cv O of Lind Avenue S. W. and S. W. 19th Street; thence N 89°49'01" W along the centerline of S. W. co 19th Street, 229 feet; thence N 0°10'59" E 30 feetltothesouthlineoftheabovedescribedpropertyandthetruepointofbeginning; thence continuing N 0°10'59" E 149 feet to the terminus of this centerline description; fa ' 2. Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Lind Avenue S.W. and S. W. 19th Street; thence i:7:4/ N 89°49'Ol" W along the centerline of S. W. 19th v 'Street, 645 feet; thence N 0.10'59" E 30 feet to tit. the south line of the above described property and the true point of beginning; thence continuing N 0°10'59" E 183 feet to the terminus of this centerline description; 3. Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of S. W. 19th Street and the west section line of said Section 19; thence N 0°47'29" E along said sectionline539.00 feet; thence S 89°49'01" E 20 feet to it /( the west line of the above described property and the true point of beginning; thence continuing S 89°49'01" E 350 feet to the terminus elf- the centerline description; 4. Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Lind Avenue S. W. and S. W. 19th Street; thence N 01°20'16" E along the centerline of Lind Avenue S. W. 585.5 feet; thence N 88°39'44" W 40 feet to the east line of the above described property and the true point of beginning; thence continuing. N 88°39'44" W 170 feet to the terminus of this centerline description.11111111 FlLE ORR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: ILPUG r. PIJCET POwER1461014 Kw,BELLEWE WASH A'rPE MON: WAYNE BRE.SSLER 1 f JJJ RECORDED TH!c^A"PI/GET EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEMPOWER r! 7 I.! All'7" . BY THE D:. "•! !CIF RECORDS,S El c .t:rl•iSMETROINDUSTRIALDISTRICT, INC. 1_v. C0:.0:ft7-; NORTHWEST COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY, INC. 1"t:ranter" herein).grants. amve'vs and w,e:rants to PI GET Sf)I INi) POWER a I.JGI IT COMPANY. a Washington air-s?. Iwrcatinn ("Grantee" herein). for the purposes hereinafter set forth a perpetual easement under,awns and over the fol.t lowing described real property (the"Property"herein) . King_ _ _. Cnnnty.Washington. All of Blocks 24 and 31, including vacated streets.•in C. D. Hillman'sEarlingtonGardensDivisionNo. 1, as recorded in Book of Plats in Volume f, ' 17, page 74, King County, Washington; EXCEPT roads deeded to the City ofRenton; 14 _'= . AND ALSO EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRI3F,D PROPERTY:1- ` ._= N The north 27 feet of Lots 6 and 53, and Lots 1 through 5 and Lots 0 54 through 58, Block 31, C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition r a Division No. 1, according to plrt recorded in Volume 17 of Plats,X4i' — •- page 74, in King County, Washington; 1 _ TOGETHER WITH the west 12 feet of vacated 86th Avenue South adjoiningLots1through5andportionofLot6. t Located in the Southwest- 'I/e ..a c..-19, Tuwrtaihip t,i North, Range 5 East,W.M. Except as may be otherwise set forth herein Grantee's rights shall be exercised upon that portion of IN i rnperty(the"Right-of Way"herein)described as(allows: RigMATIlax—..---- tratict.wWthhn:icut-- rectolsuchsidthzurarbild,wt.acoiw,e 1. The Legal Description of said Right-of-Way is attached hereto as4iExhibit "A", and incorporated herein by this reference. Via'` Grantor reserves a right to use said Right-ot-Way for other utility installation.t Grantor reserves the right to relocate all or any portion of said Right-of-WayandinstallationslocatedthereinatGrantor's expense. Grantee agrees not to unreasonably restrict access to the property in connection with Grantee's exercise of Right-of-Way. 1. Purpose.Grantee shall have the right to construct,operate.maintain,repair.replace and enlarge an underground electric transmission and/or distribution system upon and under the Rightof-Way together with all necessary or convenient ap-purtenances therefor.which may include but are not limited to the following:underground conduits,cables,communicationlines:vaults,manholes.switches,and transformers:and semi-buried or ground mounted facilities.Following the initial con-struction of its facilities.Grantee may from time to time construct such additional facilities as It may require.Ii Access.Grantee shall have the right of access to the Right-of-Way over and across the Property to enable Grantee to exer- cise its rights hereunder,provided.that Grantee shall compensate Grantor forany damage to the Property caused by the exer-cise of said right of access. Obstructions:Landscaping.Grantee may from time to time remove trees•bushes.or other obstructions within the Right-i.. ' of-Way and may level and grade the Pight-of-Way to the extent reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes set forth in Ar.:; h„... paragraph I hereof,provided.that following any such work.Grantee shall,to the extent reasonably practicable.restore theGIsRight-of-Way to the condition it was immediately prior to such work.Following the installation of Grantee's undergroundfacilities.Grantor may undertake any ordinary improvements to the landscaping of the Right-of-Way.provided that no trees orotherplantsshallbe=placed thereon which would be unreasonably expensive or impractical for Grantee to remove aces'sees restore. we_, L Granter's Use of Right-of-Way.Grantor reserves the right to use the Right-of-Way for any purpose net immmiristent withnee.v...,.:_ • the rights herein granted,provided:that Grantor shall not construct or maintain any building or other structure on the Right-o1-Way which would interfere with the exercise of the nghts hereto granted:that no digging.tunneling or other fern,of arm-struction activity shall be done on the Property which would disturb the compaction or unearth Grantee's facilities on theRight-of-Way.or endanger the lateral support to said facilities:and that no blasting shall be done within 15 feet of the Right-ef-Way. s.T-By ptin4 and rccor'dlrs this casement.Grantee agrees to indemnify and bold harmless Grantorfrom anyandallclaimsforinjuriesand/or damages suffered by any person which may he caused by the Grantee'sexercise ofthe rightshereingranted:provided.that Grantee shall not be responsible to Grantor for any injuries and/or damages to any personcausedbyactsoromissionsofGrantor. I. AbandmreaeL The rights herein granted shall continue until such time as Grantee ceases to use the Right-of-Way for atperiodoffive(31 successive years.in which event this easement Jell terminate end all rights hereunder shall revert to Gran-tor,provided that no abandonment shall he deemed to have occurred by reason of Grantee's failure to initially install its s facilities on the Righted-Way within any penal of time front the date hereof. 7. Successors and Assigns.The rights and obligations of the parties shall Inure to the benefit of and be binding upon theirrespectivesuccessorsandassigns. R-1158 FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF. 436791 REAL EST E DIVISIONPOWR f% E.XCISC IAX NC !' Milv ten PUGET POWER BLDG. niitg Cu. Rr_ •• 1 L.-vv.) i 235/75 BELLEVUE. WASHINGTON 9eoo! 8 9,..7r0= "1.10'ATtEN11ON: WAYNE DRESSIER y — j`— I, E1)this -i . day cf ' t ,. . r 19 -- qq GRANTOR 10 Gs METRO 1 ut.j.2 Aka._ DISTRICT, INC. JD O Ay3 1 i1 t 7• cr o NORTHWES ERCIAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY, INC. by° /r f. Zr- STATE OF WASI IINC]Y)N I SS STATE OF Washington 1 County of King ----fss. e "' On this 24 th day of Aiaust A. D. 191, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Wachingenni: '.. and sworn personally appeared Paul S. ChladO duly comminiona w•• to me known to be the VICE! P. and esident and Secretary,respectively, oN. NORTHWEST COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY. INC_i.`y" th, •orporation that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the said instrument to Lie,i.e Lee....: v.,;;:.-.1.: .••. -Lary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that_hriSauthorizedtoexecutethesaidinstrumentandthatthesealaffixedisthecorporatesealofsaidcorporation. e, * WITNESS my hand and official seel hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. kilki 't. N. Naas tte..d f.r 16.&at..f._Washington _- residing st—ae.attl ag WashingtonSTATEOF 1I .7 . ,County of King r Oa this 24 th day of Auous t A. D. 19Z1,before me. the under-signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington duly commissionedendswornpersonallyappearedPaulS. Chiado and 79 to me known to be the Vice President and Secretary.METRO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, INC. rY.respectively,of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument.and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and volun-tary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that__j,einauthorizedtoexecutethesaidinstrumentandtheethesealaffixedisthecocorporation,rporate seal of said WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in-this certificate above written. IMIIIIIIMIIIII J Mossy P5Wie iu awl Ur Ike Some a4-Washing tan_______ r„W;.g as Seattle A.k..s.i•anwee N Ls Cu.. a,.ti.n.Piuneet•K.tlensi TM.ins.r..c.CO. Fwr.n 1141 STATE OF WASHINGTON I SS CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENTCOUNTYOFKingI O?this 24t!bay of August 19 ,before me,the undersigned.I• MCC-ouch i e personally appearedndVicePresident. anytomeknowntobetheandA(ETRD INDI]$TRTAL DISTWrCT, INC. e respectively.of and acknowledgedcorporation that executed the foregoing instrument,the said instrument to be thefree and voluntary act and deed ofsaid corporation,for the uses and purposes thereinmentioned.and on oath stated that authorized to execute the said Instrument and that thesealaffixedisthecorporatesealofsaidcorporation. Witness me hand and official sea!hereto affixed the day and year first above written. i....... 6 Pia. .. Notary Public#0 and for the State of Washington. residing at .--.Gi.0 2 EXHIBIT "A" The north 10 feet adjoining the south margin of S. W.16th Street and the east 10 feet and the south 10 feet,and the most westerly 10 feet of the above describedproperty. D AND ALSO, Rights of Way 10 feet in width having 5 feetr of such width on each side of the following' ' ' : 0 centerlines: described 1. Beginning at the intersection of the centerlinesofLindAvenueS. W. and S. W. 19th Street;thence N 89°49'O1" W along the centerline of S. W.19th Street, 229 feet; thence N 0°10'59" E 30 feettothesouthlineoftheabovedescribedpropertyandthetruepointofbeginning; thence continuingN0°10'59" E 149 feet to the terminus of thisd;.:'" = centerline description; 2. Beginning at the ihLeLsection of the cent-Pe-linesofLindAvenueS.W. and S. W. 19th Street; thenceN89°49'01" W along the centerline of S. W. 19th411. Street, '49 feet; thence N 0°10'59" E 30 feet tothesouthlineoftheabovedescribedandthetruebeginning; propertykitki" point of be inert thence continuing1N0°10'59" E 183 feet to the terminus of thiscenterlinedescription; i- 3. Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of 7 S. W. 19th Street and the west section line of saidSection19; thence N 0°47'29" E along said sectionline554.75 feet; thence S 89°12'31" E 20 feet tothewestlineoftheabovedescribedpropertyandthetruepointofbeginning; thei.cm continuityS89°12'31" E 350 feet to the terminus of thecenterlinedescription: 4. Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines ofLindAvenueS. W. and S. W. 19th Street; thence111179N01°20'16" E along the centerline of Lind AvenueS. W. 585.5 feet; thence N 88°39'44" W 40 feet totheeastlineoftheabovedescribedpropertyand thetruepointofbeginning; thence continuing N 88°39'44'W 170 feet to the terminus of this centerlineiFldescription. F ii I 11/1 o7 1 waMMMINIMM ' FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF:1 PUGET POWERREALESTATE DIVISION puGET POWER BLDG. er ON N8009BE%•LEVUE. WA{INGT ATTENTION: WAYNE BRESSIER A 3i.7 ,I t a r ri R/W A1-6-74 /1 1-5.4 C RICOR0EP1R1iI./ L.I.D. 0 314 t - W DEED fte tc It 83 AM'$' ay 1.it 004.4404 OF RECohG COUNT', IONS The grantor herein SJnl In n4,f4r•o 1. 4-y i+4faes 1 Darti. Inc. 1.4 E for the consideration of Ten and n/100 Dollar• and other valuable consideration,cone i t r Of king, ate of Washington,convey warrant lh>•. ly d un gt CC)•all interest in the following described r.:al estate: W That portion of Lot 2 of City of Renton Short Subdivision No. 431-79,also known as Valley Office and Industrial Park, Subdivisior. No. 1 situated in the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range S East, M.N., King County. Washington, Auditor's File No.i` 8002269013. records of King County. Washington, described as follows: e BEGINNING at the intersection of the centerline of Southwest 16th Street with the centerline of Lind Avenue S.W.; thence, along the centerline of said Lind Avenue S.M.. South 1.20'16' West v 45.02 feet to the Easterly prolongation of the South right-of-way line of 7 v Southwest 16th Street; thence, along said prolongation,South 89635'25' West 76.10 feet. to the true point of beginning, the point of cusp with a tangent curve. concave to the Southwest, having a radius of 35.00 feet; the:.ce Southeasterly, along said curve. through a central angle of 91'44'51". an arc length of 56.05 feet to the West right-of-way line of Lind Avenue S.W.; thence, along said West right-of-way line. South 1'20'16' West 20.62 feet to the point of cusp with a tangent curve, concave to the Southwest, having a radius of 55.00 feet: thence Northwesterly along said curve, through a central angle of 91644'S1'. an arc length of 88.07 feet to the South right-of-way line of Southwest 16th Street; thence, along said South right-of-way line, North 89'35'25' East 20.62 feet,1,to the true point of beginning. CONTAINS ern area of 414.53 square feet or 0.31 Acres N/L R/W - LINO AVENUE S. W. 1%EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED1411t;Co.Records Division Dis .—t:- /`wit together with the right to make all necessary slopes for cuts and fills upon the abutting property on each side of any road which is now. or may be constructed hereafter on said property.in conformity with standard plans sad specifications for highway purposes.and to the.aame extent and purpose as if the rights herein panted had been acquired by condemnation proceedings under Eminent Domain statutes of the State of Washington. situated in the County of King.State of Washington. Dated this Z3,T.1.—...day cL.._._DASAMbmr r A.D. 1!_81_. I;-'4" t 4 F.1 t'i 71.: ? FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF'. IFFICE IF TIE WV CIFIK UNTIE IIII1CIPIL ROL , ni 11111 AIL SI. / KOK VI 11155 r. l•I . . I I 4 3 : • I,. 5' • " a ' I I I tiII 1 1 is 1 1 tz E , .its...41 Cr] 111 ta IK i i 4.0.pma A&pm.v,.r.,apply LAM 7+ 11 4/774.4- 1ZNI , or 1 10.ma moqv Ism na4'pug Avp aq; pas ppwo pus pusq :ittrApon uaam ii 3amptiodamcppocpxisummmaimicllecapplitlipaAVINMOINVIMI f poiv luatourpo;pm vinous o;paspomns ••• •• sair•Asql •Ism pawls moo uo pug'pauogi oats: upsaln sueoctmd pas non aq; Jo; •uool2od1o3 ppes jo pap put ira Lresunioa pug au; aq; aq a; psausnalm;pm papal/mm.4n pug•suaunu;sui Surdlamq atn papwaxa pin uocasaoctioa am jo t1 uapTgaid go*TA PC/W Ailnaspas atn aq a;111110(Z4 MI 01 il,.. C/PVTIr3- ...S...In•c1 Pa ust04ITM •If 'V II puradds Anmaxsad am au3;aq- 96 T -liequeoec; • Jo Lip • •pzrz Inn u0 I OMIX AO Ail1003 ft t I •NOIONDISVM JO ZLV.12 1M104.1.107100T1EAOKX3V NOLLVII0d11031 Ao 0WIPAII 111•20111/010a/0 81011,MO al pro lap aqqad ilaproN valuta aaocts mu mai pow Asp aql mai pilaw pug punt ita antrum l Ramona Inman !I1, • sriodand usp non atn ao;paap pint pa LieltM/OA pow au; TO SUM OM papas pas MOP' 11tr lull 0111 0%PaSP31/6010100 Puy 1110‘00.110111 1441W itI Pamaxa put 01 Pac11131V inPIAIMII 0112 El 01 tumult Sul 01 r -- III .mum Agepauad luau pin pautopspuuto.,Linp'uoglusifeht;o aim aqi Jo;pus 111 Weil 4,1•1141•'no 0301aq' 61 ' Jo Lip air;u0 i - i DMZ d10 LLM1100 in Ii NOLDNIIISYM JO 31.Y.IS z; *.f• . N. u 1 4mukommummilimikupeorimummodr -4.M.1111111111414,4,p V 0= iomAFTERRECORDINGPLEASEMAILTO:KING CCUN Y n pv'o v rnTRANSAMERICATITLECOMPANYEXC! F TAX PAID o-,< G Park Place rrT.: T 5th Avenue at University Street 1 0 toSeattle, Washington 98101 Z a Attention: Carol Ohail Escrow.No. 0857314 STATUTORY WARRANT DEED 89/03i10 105WARRANTYRECOF6.00 CASHSL 6.00 The Grantor, Valley Office 4 Industrial Park Incor- 55 porated, formerly Metro Industrial District, Inc., a Washington corporation, for Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged byGrantor, hereby conveys and warrants to the Grantee, The AustinCD O Company, an Ohio corporation, the following described real prop- ertyerty located in the City of Reciton, King County, Washington Property"): Q` LOTS 2 AND 3 OF VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK — SUBDIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8002269013; EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON FOR STREET PURPOSES BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 8007070464, 8008200077 AND 8202160354; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. This conveyance is made expressly subject to the following matters: 1. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: N GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power 4 Light Company, a Washington corporation 1.1-1 PURPOSE: Underground electric transmission and/or distribution system AREA AFFECTED: As stated herein DATED: August 24, 1979 RECORDED: February 1, 1980 RECORDING NO.: 8002010480 Covers Lots 2, 3 and 4) Contains covenant prohibiting structures over said easement or other activity which might endanger the underground system. FC? R-7P7 AT REQUEST OF TITLE 37.J 1 i. • . ' E. KJF000061V P.C. i 4 3 AR 101989 Fited by, TA T r err.` .. _. _. r-. -- -.-. - r } J r1% Said easement is a re-record of the easement recorded onSeptember7, 1979, under Recording No. 7909070696. 2. Easements, restrictions and recital set forth on the face of short plat recorded under King County Recording No. 8202269013. 3. Right granted to the Seattle Electric Company by C.D. HillmanandBessieOliveHillman, his wife, by instrument dated June 30,1909, recorded under Recording No. 624312, to divert, appropri- ate or remove the water running in the ditch or ditches located upon the plat of said addition. 4. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon propertyhereindescribedasgrantedtoKingCountybydeedrecorded under Recording No. 8202160354. 5. Rights reserved in federal patents or state deeds and building or use restrictions general to the district. Dated: March ? , 1989 Grantor) VALLEY OFFICE i INDUSTRIAL PARK INCORPORATED, a Washington Cor ration CD CD lD Paul S. Chiado, Vice PresidentM O CN STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF KING On this 9 day of 1989, before me, a NotaryPublicinandfortheStateoWashington, duly commissioned andsworn, personally appeared Paul S. Chiado to me known to be theVicePresidentofValleyOfficetIndustrialParkIncorporated, the corporation named in and which executed the foregoinginstrument; and he acknowledged to me that he signed the same asthefreeandvoluntaryactanddeedofsaidcorporationfortheusesandpurposesthereinmentioned, being authorized so to do. WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and year inthiscertificateabovewritten. Notary PuJs in and for the State o 1 of Washington, residing at c•My commission expires t • C44111441.k.11740774eirFiledbyTAMAR101989 Woodward•Clyde Consultants August 31, 1988 Mr. John Steensland The Austin Company 800 Southwest 16th Street Renton, Washington 98055 Dear John: Woodward-Clyde Consultants is pleased to submit this letter report regarding the property located at SW 16th and Lind Ave. The major conclusion from this study is that there are no significant environmental concerns regarding this site. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Woodward-Clyde Consultants was contracted by the Austin Company to conduct anenvironmentalassessmentofaportionoftheirpropertylocatedinRenton, Washington. T e`h particular site is located across Southwest 16th Street to southeast of The Austin Company building. The purpose of the survey was to assess the extent, if any,of environmental liability at thesite. The property ownership may soon be changing and a baseline environmental audit needed to be established in conjunction with that property transfer. The scope of work was limited to: a site visit,interviews.with representatives of The Austin Co., McCann Construction,and contacts to the Washington Department of Ecology. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION A ivc of Woodward-Clyde Consultants visited the site of interest on August 29, 1988. He wormer by Mr.John Steensland of The Austin Co. The site visit included a walk across and mend the property. 2.1 Site Caadidoos The site is baled on the southwest corner of Southwest 16th Avenue and Lind Avenue in Renton, Washington (Figure 1). This lies within the Kent Valley. The Kent Valleyistopographicyabroad,Satflo v . The site is underlain by fine pained sandsandsandysilts. The topography across the site is relatively Sat,with a topographic relief oflessthan5feetBasedongeneralknowledgeofthearea,we expect the natural ground water gradients under the sue are gentle, with flow to the north and northwest. Ground water at the site is probably close to the land surface. This shallow ground water could haveadverseeffectsifspillsweretohappeninthefunne. Consulting Engineers.Geologists and Envwronmentai Scientists 4110OfficesinOtherPrincioalCities 1 1 I 7 -,.. .......4, i , 1 g-1-1:Fil.... i lit. ow n 4,;'', 1,;•:::..,.i\,,,,e,.„‘ 141' 1: 10.4..i. a .. it. ,.....7.r.ci . ,-_: . rolteki":4": . -., it 10.„. :_ .. 1 A- -ii,*10).,Ifelidr,era, t_. 4"pril- i& T.4 11 . ., . / - ,ink e ....., N:::- 41-- 1 I,,.. 41tilill 0—'11Wrii I 4 11' E N 1 0 NI ! rei l - 3------;:111h ilk e srtE ucc noN 774 4' -. lb- -.--i,,E:--:IL-7--- many:aki,,,,ii- g ___.. i, _ 4' ." 4".011\-„itti .. F.i: E I 'itir"‘A--112S f; o t . i I I I.t 1 -is ,?Nip I. e I d N., 1 NE ; ran a* • i . to. . . iiiii _,w.n 41 i 1 kic 111 A 66 : i e • v'--- t...... 1 r a" F( 4 7 - 7 1ps;I 31 1 • , i mitt- ir i r,.. ..., . 1( PE, J 1 Ina M J.%1111' 11- 1. T 11111111 61 rrr 0. tPr7TIPICIa_-iaa.ma; i _ ' I L. .:.. i .. .V IlJ 11 a WTI TT• A I,i_. I. i I i. _._ STIE LOCATION Proact No THE AUSTIN COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RENTON. WASHINGTON FIGURE 1 Woodward•Clycie Consultants Mr. John Steensland The Austin Company August 31, 1988 Page Two The site is largely undeveloped. The southern portion of the site has been covered with gravel. Railroad tie dividers are set on the ground to delineate parking boundaries. This portion of the property, however, is not presently used. The remainder of the site isundevelopedandcoveredwithtallgrass, berries and trees. A Puget Power substation is located in the north-central portion of the site. We understand this portion of the property is not to be included in the transaction. Aerial photographs of the site from 1977 and 1980 are shown in Appendix A. Thephotogaphsshowthatsomefillwasplacedonthesiteinthelate1970's. This fill wasdredgedfromtheDeltaMarineareaontheDuwamishRiver. A conversation with Jack McCann of Jack McCann Construction did not reveal anything significant or noticeable about the fill. He indicated that fill from this area was used in many of the development projects in the Kent Valley, including Southcenter. Subsequent to the Duwamish fill, additional fill was placed in the southern portion of the site. This fill, where the unused parking area is located, was obtained just south of the site where a Boeing office building is located. 2.2 Surrounding Site Conditions The majority of the area around the site is undeveloped or used for commercial purposes. Boeing has an office building and associated parking areas to the south. To the north is the previously mentioned substation. This substation is graveled over and surrounded by a berm and dry moat. 3.0 SITE VISIT 3.1 Current and Prior Usage The site is currently unused. A review of aerial . . . 'hs from 1968 through the present time indicate that the site has not been ' ' . -' at any nme in the past. Photographs taken before the Bel wu placed at the site indicate the site was vacant and unused,except perhapsp 1 A small drainage channel can be observed on the earlier, aerial 4.0 REGULA1ORY REVIEW Due to the nature of the past and present land usage we did not perform an in-depth regulatory review of the site. The site is not listed on the USF:PA National Priorities List. In addition,we have contacted the Washington Department of Ecology. We could not find any record of regulatory involvement at the site. The price and present usage of the site do not create concern with respect to environmental contamination. We could find no indication that there would be any regulatory records of the site. Woodward-Clyde Consultants Mr. John Steensland The Austin Company August 31, 1988 Page Three 5.0 CONCLUSIONS There is, with any vacant overgrown lot, the possibility of illegal "midnight" dumping going undetected until construction. We did not detect any signs of this activity in our site visit. The Austin property located at SW 16th St. and Lind Avenue in Renton, Washington appears to be free of significant environmental contamination. The land usage appears to have been either agricultural or raw land until recently. The fill that was placed on the site came from a common source that does not cause environmental concern. If you have any questions, please call us at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, WOODWARD-C.YDE CONSULTANTS 4E144. 1).(-0. 1 Hans Ewoldsen Warren W. Perkins Vice-President Project Hydrogeologist HEJWWP/ca v I. Egcr 1Liqr• 3 Ivo i ft- -• .Z ,bR .• •;' '';t . r --- . 11 :_fir- II . - '—' .; ;, illi77' ' "'• ., 4. I. t1.7 :•S a1 ice: r 1,. SITE LOCATION .''1 '" a,•. • I ,- i 4 9.' - 74r.117-4411:,..._-..t r..:.. ...: c. t-•':':' :::- ''' -:. '':,r-': A: 4.- 1- 11.4' $1: 4,, vp. ..: ..sAr.. . v...; 4;..i. 2:pr:87...:;. 1;••• 4..... 4........ s,,•14.,... .:. An,....-,,-. r . 7.x. ' .-.4. . , .-- 7 .% 4 .:14.. rr. -!::.: . I e • lk... 1.... ., ,. 11,- 1 1 v'. S` i j ti. irsik N..,,:..: ', 1 4: - ,i1 i _,..----- , 11 . ,, • 1 1 s ai l' II J am' 4 1; ri il -2.„?.4.4 r:/. ‘...:,_ .... . .flo‘ 1 NIM ra. li3i -fir I% Irsle. •:/.' : I A': II,.. . .: 4‘.°II. -. ' 1 ..,.. 4%.. 'It/'‘..., 1 it) c y41iErtom•. o ram'". >L.y. i e i T... i 1 ' rR M. 1 -"et lei i171/kin a• Z I AERIAL, PHOTOGRAPH 1977 P"''r' ,THE AUSTIN COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FIGURE A Ctyde i RENTON. WASHINGTON I 011141nallifTWAV- r.•'. .- -4 I)* tillOim:_iff-r, N 1•te:'•.Allik 41SaRa41-;‘''''''' ..34,. ,.. .-- 1:'.‘ ttEr*:..., ...1 1 r \ •44, . 1 i 4f.7.... •.• ., . Cr. I.4-mi'I% •411, n .. - • .-.. ,,N. 7... -- = 1 4 41le •• V '14.- 4,4 ,. , .1 401 -. 1 al, di. %, 7x •-,,, . ,, . e,ii.twilidiiiiiirig., . r.,, .' N'il - 1 - a. ... •.-.. - k t -VII •--t . • - , . frcril 44,• ••••-- vi .-.,,-1,"Pkir' ., '4 :. t•_,-it--4 .;.54- 4 :..,. A '',. .-- KAVin •pv- , ;. 9 " . q • '.., r . -7. 3 i .441 • 21 a p : •. 1 41i • . 11;4 _ ... . 4 11. f. : 14- 11.'-.F• C . 1 It' •r •is 4±":e•d.. 4475r.ii... .a . - "criip ,.. . t:f41-tiir th: ,IP 11/_: . - J ,.' • _. •_18, .• 4-11 • ;.• ...- • . 4,.. •-•li •k a -.•\/ 1 0 " 3 - h-.dfe • • 1 ..• . • - au ii.:'. MI . r...- 1a ''' n 11 sdittiatiE411 -....4141* 4741 r 11 'ILA' . - • ..-,_" i.... - •-.• 1.7 1.___,91 mi i V i V. • :,i" "..• .ii idi•:Ai. .7,4*..4.1.N.911 9A4,.:.t ',. r_.7.1r :,.., •••_ - . .,i,..._-•"-i. -,.: c*.‘a.".:, "1". ' -•I' 7.1 . 1 4... I Z . ! -: .... it 4 -, .- .t " ir...," we • 4- -., . -_,,-;, _ 4. - --• ..---1:1- 1 fa.jem . • illegtzto- . "••••••.: _ i - -•:;" -4 . " ; •''''... , Mit • sa#'... r- • -.•- .,i; s •/ ••: a 4 • 1_;33.0&71.14rain:tii.. 1, -. 16 fri rig:.- ..bi,A 1e9*4 • ,.. • 91.4-." • .4 illt." 4 ft * • Vlakip.2rikii-71§. I• •: f--..."2alil 71* • iNS 7.` ..• • _ -;0\11 jin . :. b: i :ti7,' 4- Arl"r, • b41_-_ .: ._ ,___-.4 0-ig -1' i gl IL. , 4.,.. .• *Pr 11 - " • . . li : • v„ - - 7‘! ; . . A• 7 I. 0 • 1 2 ' i- .. 7'"*".- _....i• •-.P. - _ -.... "..: • - - 4 icli VAR .0. • i "_._ -'- .-"wil a . 1 ''''"--. •• ..,.l'(.••• ". -.. i •t c 7- I .''' ...i I bl -it J . :j. . Fn. i1•.•./ .... • .:....... _ .. ..-•- .imb, _ ; / ... 17'7: --lilt: 1 '''t 'L.! . 4 !r• t I 1 .7. '1 I 11 1 ., •..I. -...ispj-- :.i::...7.7I !1 j.!:;'.:11k...,•-"'. 1.., le,. --'";,;;:•.i re ! f' ....' •. r\z i, . 4111‘.-:. it " • ::-. 1, :, ...c.,.: 1itLOCATIONi i AM!' • .31 tillteihm. 4i. , •1 tow , I 4,•• ; - • r Ai_ . 4.? ....• 1r IL> ir-,41,., a _ _. .-. .. -...-. ._. C- .,_\ z..-, g..., 1•• 4,:•• 1 I a..... P..- . 1 ./- •-It... - sr•... I 4 • 2 i - I r1.. I; -• '- i ii. ii,A., . . r i 7 ,•::- --- ;‘)111 Li . .1. . ....... - J 1 ' I= . .4- •g 1 bIL.A _,__ i 1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 1980 THE AUSTIN COMPANY F,NVIRONMENTAI, ASSESSMENT FIGURE A RENTON, WASHINGTONWoodward-Chicle Coneultants • One Oran Square Woodward.Clyde ConsultantsSuite29e0 Sesta..WA 98101 206)343-7933 cE E1VEL) d C 7 September 19, 1988 THE AUSTIN CO. Mr. Warren Pugh The Austin Company 820 Southwest 16th Street Renton,WA 98055 Dear Warren: In response to your request,Woodward-Clyde Consultants has reviewed the physical andecologicalenvironmentofthepropertylocatedsouthof16thAvenueandboundedbyLindandRaymondAvenues,respectively,to develop a preliminary advisory assessment for the purpose of ascertaining whether the property could fall within the'wetlands" category asdefinedbytheCorpsofEngineersWetlandsDelineationManual,Technical Report Y-87-1, January 1987. This preliminaryadvisory assessment considered the guidelines within the referenceddocumentinconjunctionwitha)a review of aerial photography from the period 1970-1980; b)site reconnaissance;c)review of topographic mapping; and,d)available information regarding the site history as Imowti by the Austin Company,to determine whether the sitehasatpresent,or in the period 1977-present had,characteristics which could have placed it in the wetlands category. Current Conditions At present, the site is partially developed, with a Puget Power substation in the north-center of the site,parking areas on the western and southwestern sides,and vacant filled areas in the northeast and southeast quarter. The site has been filled over most,if not all,of the area,with subsequent vegetation growth consisting of grasses and shrubs,and the one area of low to medium height,small diametertrees. The fairreat hydrologic,soils,and vegetation conditions on site are as follows: The site,.as aarendy graded,delivers surface water to two drains in the south center of the site. Ode sunup and drain accepts surface runoff from the Puget Power switchyard and its immediate environs to the west and northwest. The other,evidendy part of the storm sewersystem, accepts water from the eastern and northern portions of the site. No free-standing surface water or saturated surface soils were found on site during the site visit. The bottom of the sump for the Puget Power switchyard area stands approximately 2 feet below adjacent grade,and was dry. The storm sewer vault south of the switchyard had standing waterapproximately16inchesbelowthetopofthegrating. The grating was not removable,and the standing water may lie at the bottom of the vault,rather than representing the current water table. The storm sewer vault lies in a depressed area and is lower than the easternmost two-thirds of the site. Consulting Engineers.Geologists and Enwronmentel Scientists Lik Offices in Otter Principal Cities VVoodwarciselyde Consultants Mr. Warren Pugh The Austin Company September 19, 1988 Page Two Two shallow pits to examine soil profile were excavated on the site. These were approximately 12 inches deep and were in dry granular materials for the entire depth. Based on site observations, the current water table is at least two feet below average site grade. The drainage characteristics of the fill materials are good, and surface rainfall is not anticipated to pond on site for an extended time. site Soils The current site soils distribution can be divided into the following areas: eastern one-third of the site: covered by granular fill,with appreciable fine sand to silt fraction,to a depth estimated to be several feet. Puget Power switchyard: covered by fine to medium gravel over a fill pad,fill similar to that found on the eastern one-third of the site. south central sixth of the site: surface soils consist of a mixture of fine sands and silts, with significant gravel and cobble content. This material is evidently imported fill, as the gravel and cobble content is much higher than normally encountered on the Omen River floodplain. northwest sixth of the site: surface soils are similar to those found in the south central sixth of the site,with slightly lesser amounts of gravel and cobbles. southwest quarter of the site: parking lot area,currently unused,covered by several feet of granular and angular fill materials. The site reconnaissance did not identify any portion of the site with clear original in-situ soils in-place. In-situ soils are found to the southwest of the site,across Raymond Avenue. These are typical floodplain fine sands and silts. Site Vegetation A site vegetation survey was completed at the site. During the survey,the vegetation was assessed and plant communities were described as an association of overstory and understory species which characterize particular homogeneous areas. The percent of hydropltic vegetation cover was assessed for each area described. Seven distinct vegetative communities of interest were identified on the property. The original field vegetation lists for these areas can be found as an appendix to this letter. The area numbers below refer to the areas numbered on the map. Two of these areas are poten- tial wetland forest patches(1,6), and the rest are flat meadow areas of varying vegetation cover. Woodward-Clyde Consultants Mr. Warren Pugh The Austin Company September 19, 1988 Page Three Plots(3,4)exhibited approximately 40 to 60%cover of scattered young saplings of cotton wood(of approximately three to six years of age). An understory of mixed uplands and wetlands species was found in Plot 4. Species presently found on site may have been imported with the fill material. The discussion below provides a description of the seven areas; a sketch map of their approximate distributions is provided. Area 1: Tree cover in this area is black cottonwood(Populus trichocarpa), and willow Salix spp). The understory is dominated by Himalayan blackberry(Rubus discolor), and red-osier dogwood (Corpus stolonifera),Groundcover is sparse and consists primarily of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea),red fescue grass(Festuca rubra), Canadian thistle Cirsium arvense), and tansy(Tanacetum vulgare). The area is considered to have greater than 50% hydrophytic vegetation. Area 2; The groundcover in this area is dominated by colonial bentgass (Agrostis tenuis), red fescue,common plantain(Plantago major),and birds foot-trefoil (Lotus corniculatus). This vegetation community represents the largest surface cover on the site. It contains very little hydrophytic vegetation. Area 3;, Tree cover in this area is black cottonwood(18-25 years in age). The understory is dominated by Himalayan blackberry,and Scot's broom(Cytisus scoparius). Groundcover is sparse and consists primarily of reed canarygrass. Area 4; Shrub cover in this area is dominated by saplings of black cottonwood(three to six years in age). Groundcover is dominated by colonial bentgrass,red fescue,common plantain, and birdsfoot-trefoil. Ainat This area is highly disturbed with very little vegetation. It is filled with large gravel and has scattered patches of grass(species unknown),madrona(Arbutus rnenziesii),clover trifolium spp.),and pearly everlasting(Anaphalis margarticaea). This area is extremely dry. AreaArea 6: Trei cover in this area consists of willow,and black cottonwood. The understory is dominated by red-osier dogwood,reed canarygrass, and tansy. The area is considered to have greater than 50% hydrophytic vegetation. mil The groundcover in this area is dominated by tansy,with equal parts of reed canary grass,and birdsfoot-trefoil. The vegetation is not considered hydrophytic. Interpretation of Available Data: Air Photo Interpretatioq From aerial photography, and a verbal description of the filling process,it is apparent that portions of the site were filled prior to 1977,with completion of a grade level,site wide fill in the period 1977-1980. The 1977 photo shows fill and grassy areas over much of the site, with low to medium height trees along the western edge. These are photo-interpretively Woodward•Clyde Consuttants Mr. Warren Pugh The Austin Company September 19, 1988 Page Four similar to vegetation found south of the Group Health building at present. This vegetation was examined and is of types normally associated with well-drained soils. The scale anddetailofthe1977photoarenotsufficienttogathermuchdetailon, for example, 50 x 50 foot plots, but no portion of the site exhibits definite photo evidence of classic wetlands vegetation such as that which still exists southeast of Lind and 19th Avenues,where a clear wetlands area is found. The area to the south of the site in the 1977 photo,presently developed,does not contain obvious evidence which would support a photogeologic wetland categorization of that area, nor northward extension. A similar condition existed east of the site, where predominantly grasses existed, with small areas of medium height trees. The vegetation on-site in the 1977 photograph(taken on 4-12-77)has evidently been growing for several years,as clumps of bushes with apparent heights of six feet or so and other scattered trees can be observed in the air photo. This would indicate that the site had been in its general 1977 condition since at least early 1975 (two elapsed growing seasons until the time of the photo). Interpretation of Site Reconnaissance Date The site reconnaissance data,presented in the current conditions section, supports the existence of from two to four feet of fill throughout the site,with no natural soils currently exposed. The ground water table on the site is at least 18 inches to two feet below current average grade. The reconnaissance was conducted during the dry season (September),and some rise. in water table can be expected during the wet season. There is no evidence of permanent standing water or saturated soils at the surface during normal years. The vegetation site consists primarily of species that are classes as "facultative" to facultative-wet". These types of vegetation are widespread throughout lowlands and floodplain seas of the Northwest,and do not necessarily place an area in a wetlands category. Due to the filled nature of the site and the modification to the original hydrology, neither the soils nor hydrology offer definitive exclusion from or inclusion in the wetlands category. Review of available topographic mapping, and visual reconnaissance of the site and areas surrounding the site for a distance of two blocks did not yield any evidence to support classic wetlands categorization. Visual evidence supported typical river flood plain deposits and vegetation around the site, subject only to ephemeral inundation,and filled areas. I 111............... _1 Y, Tr - . .. n z-r4. il-i a: If :-. ,' -!, - ".' 4i,"t if: ,,..-...••••,. . •• :1 I:__1..-s - V . ti-4 ;! -i :iiik.-. 1'.'—' _..1•1;.--- • •. ;allp ' 'tarir-- i i4-:alr .1. , ., i. i• iftiitIiii, .. ma — .'111 . .. '.111,1 ....---•••••-,...:Asrle. ' i-14 ••• :---' I- - . IVII:e- -1 i •:- v.''-‘..._:57.: - .-,r 1; , . •1 .. • . SITE LOCATION I TIC om l , _ t. .T • ' .-----_ - T - - 1 Y 1! • t.•L Vim.1. Ii‘liki:Ir.l TTT Sti.ate.. ii :, i.e. . # a u 1 L 1- ...:- - 1 1- I M.nit ' 4,- *14... 1.. 1 ;,-:: li f'/y• j y r t r ifiha I j W •Y T - h 'I 'it 1 r 1 4.1 ..7 ' I' e ,_ 1 V•''7 I '- - i .. IP. J. Y l 1 wB0. 4 I. _ ..•.• , a I..M..M..I N- - 4 j i ae. 1 ' AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 1977 Protect No THE AUSTIN COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FIGURE A-1 Woodwar .ayds Consultants RENTON, WASHINGTON ail li•I.1)°‘ 11.-1141.1 1 . liki. NI; . : 11. i :.—_,. . -„,... 2. ,fr...ez. .. ..... , ,,,nr: . \,,, , . ..:. . ...::::-.4k,, ,:—.,..-, . , t 1. fr...iiiirienit'l : i: p 27t , i;,: s. -. , —... ,%.• . .. : — .. f P.'"' - s •:- I!,. ' !L.- -, h...., .4'4. " I •.'tti; - 1 Ale . ram.2 -i !` : Meg tip z t .tL- L, ' •- g •y ... ..• ••.illit:Irt414 - : at2. 1 iliep• -..__..7. .. sokop....,..: ., ....1. - _-- „-- _qi ---:.'tjosoe'll. • - 47- ....-..1,---...1..., . _ 4-d L•j_ye:*.' {\ \ :!:-• ‘.. ...' • --.!•,-... .1"--- -...' . -: ; 1•W- :4 4 7_.,-;-•"- . - cops F ;:r, - , ,ifr . d=EP 0TH. 2__r. . 11. 1 a". 1 ''.. 1:.. IA -114-7 7,411'.7: i s' 1, 4 1 r' rt SITEIllicipi LOCATION I r • L a 1 r is a-'f.1 r.k. , s,,,To-. - . ._ • . .., . ..iL.: -, ,.... ,. .„ -..-. . . N7.1.-:,:: . ,_. r 1 , t IiiiStyMT.• T TIIIper-- ' Al. :.3-.>"-' . i. .LIM I -1 ) T' AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 1980 Protect No THE AUSTIN COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FIGURE A-2! I Noodward•C Consultants RENTON, WASHINGTON l 1 qust Cou SITS - LT z` l:4 Pit=T Of• 9l9188 t n4A- EA ^.ANT ISl...rs. L 1 L'Ty GA7C N i+N I . LA io cAPs A%E..c,A T 111ii I. -I- I s. W 16.Ta• ,' T. L..— III I: 1. Lar2 Po, J a1Ilti . . uto.. k \ ‘ i \ cam \ \Oak\ \ 1 \ \, \ t lit- \ v L P a G„ •Vim;r+g . i S.I g . -.. 1 = it.- • , . SoZ,ob' i•_ C C L `ILL' GRa1Vb,L - C-LZZZ a w GI N W I l t'CC CI3ZZ , Z ZZLZ WETLAND DETERMINATION MODIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH Date 416 leg Staff 66C Plot # C'te VEGETATION 3' ° t U1 Status % cover HerbsTrees Status % cover p poptAWo H atcr0401 f4- 50 0 TAN .(th.441 c 1'peg Z. 0 Tau Sp9 Fk-)o'5L to 0 NZc w, a(v$1Se Ftut Z. 0 0 pi l fM `t cwcM 1 PhG.W 5 p 00 v1KAcu.s l $ A%.'s FA-L 'Z r Status % cover 0 SiaCa bra FMabrula p s ir(O(QC" FOIC- Z 0 lo1 IJQrt t F,ic a zI 0 COrr utS sjQ101 Frit 7 g lah o H'labon e_ t p AvOs1Ht - i qts 0 a 't+9av1/4/6` spy, of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: (0O90 cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: -ii ),Hydrophytic vegetation? SOILS 1,0183 = C11 ries/Phase On hydric soils list? iorizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample Soil type: (sand,day, etc.) B horizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample_ Soil type: (sand,clay,etc.) Gleyed? Other indicators Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration Approximate %organic content (by volume) Texture Hydric soils? Basis HYDROLOGY Inundated?Depth of standing water Saturated soils? Depth to saturated soils Describe obvious topographic features,if any: Wetland hydrology? Basis Normal Circumstances? Atypical situation? Wetland determination Basis comments: vvETL AND DETERMINATION MODIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH Site '' lv 1 Date C1ler kSr Staff C Plot # Z 2. GETATION3r°4".' 11 Q it- I Status % cover Herbs Status % coverTrees p eesNIAk,Ae }, iloco tuk FFc_- 3"'° 0?DnCuW Pr,.I51. c140.4 GI(1I p Fro.,HkAo tuKfiki q f c , f 0 0 T1^0!0*+s e.(04,40!61A L 1015 p 0 04040, ofet ii\A-e F 4 C v a 40 p 0 Pe..14.0 u r bra f tic /0'1c 0 i4olrcla \0.4o.44A.4 Fr1L l Shrubs Status % cover 0 4arosir s 451wis.._ FA(ct 50.io 0Ns3cs S(o() 0.0 0 unkKawtvr c` -Reivl — S90 0 d pt khill rW Ffic.t 10 }o 0 Q,AVM'QX 6°4'75614 eAC alo 0 Q PTV gamma see Flo 0 Q 412110 S('p(z) — at o 0 1'COJL4o cor uA\/"h- btu of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 3(1 lam cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 3 Hydrophytic vegetation? SOILS Series/Phase On hydric soils list? E rizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample Soil type: (sand,day, etc.) B horizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample_ Soil type: (sand,day, etc.) Gleyed? Other indicators Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration Approximate %organic content (by volume) Texture Hydric soils? Basis HYDROLOGY Inundated?Depth of standing water Saturated soils? Depth to saturated soils Describe obvious topographic features, if any: Wetland hydrology? Basis Normal Circumstances? Atypical situation? Wetland determination Basis Comments: WETLAND DETERMINATION MODIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH P;s Date +8 Staff SS C. Plot # 3 e VEGETATION Status % cover Herbs Status % cover TorePWW.S yak o c. phatan+S a(y' rAc‘..) !s- o 0 Ile s P-(Fv, S F-e+C •j + 0 1 0 R•+nvt..Hl S rem+ S i-+t w Z 0 O N11r9 S{'P Shrubs Status % cover 0 0 r M )s b tS(. RAC— 10 0 o L4sfrS scaP 5 0 a'hMtAs 2- 0 0 of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 6 cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 8`5 Hydrophytic vegetation? SOILS ries/Phase On hydric soils list? iorizon: depth matrix color mottle color_depth of sample Soil type:(sand,day,etc.) B horizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample_ Soil type: (sand,day, etc.) Gleyed? Other indicators Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration Approximate %organic content (by volume) Texture Hydric soils? Basis HYDROLOGY Inundated?Depth of standing water Saturated soils? Depth to saturated soils Describe obvious topographic features,if any: Wetland hydrology? Basis Normal Circumstances? Atypical situation? Wetland determination Basis r'omments: WETLAND DETERMINATION MODIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH Site Date q L S ki Staff S'S C Plot # VEGETATION Status % cover Herbs Status % cover Tees 0 rpoilo /1 ir1A0(cu PQ r'r4C. d\,o 0 f c u.J) kO/G(,O FAc ' H o 0 0 tisf cA 3 ret - 15 'to 0 thkott4. pro ` -Qk rk A < 1 o 0 0 pltrrb„J S Ur ksq,Fri(w 3 q o otiI A Shrubs Status % cover 0c t(cow itiw ter qo 0 Q.t.bun clt Sca, FAC- 31)0 0{fit t rt1 t P Cw rl (1,t,1 Afit1 u' M —f 0 Fto'ftr.w, ((Oak A Frtc M1 L I op OPtku t, c 0 0 Aves s me,µ, 0 1:7:61 Vl. cc, 0 4 COI-LAS CO'n r t u kuhM o cl o 0 of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: ( ' cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 7 o Hydrophytic vegetation? SOILS e',ries/Phase On hydric soils list? iorizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample Soil type: (sand,clay, etc.) B horizon: depth matrix color___ mottle color depth of sample_ Soil type: (sand, clay, etc.) Gleyed? Other indicators Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration Approximate %organic content (by volume) Texture Hydric soils? Basis HYDROLOGY Inundated?Depth of standing water Saturated soils? Depth to saturated soils Describe obvious topographic features.if any: Wetland hydrology? Basis Normal Circumstances? Atypical situation? Wetland determination Basis comments: WETLAND DETERMINATION MODIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH Siten ' ac ' I Date 9 l k((" s SeiStaff G Plot #ir VEGETATION tp 1-fir Trees Status % cover Herbs Status % cover O Alh JO& Frtc.10l0 0 tyw3 unkv10,"C 0 Pbruk.,4 M c 3)0 0 41/4i .ki V1AOIu I it, 0 0 t-R•Fal;AAA .sop 3 o p 0 f mod. - I o ti 0 Shrubs 2v2-"3 Status % cover 0 0 40auixe xYthZ Y5 J-0 0 0 C 5 S c.ep gNd}p 0 Now) rtc rAc- t i)o 0 0 0 of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 0 °o cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: 100 Hydrophytic vegetation? SOILS Qeries/Phase On hydric soils list? norizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample Soil type: (sand,day, etc.) B horizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample_ Soil type: (sand,day, etc.) Gleyed? Other indicators. Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration Approximate % organic content (by volume) Texture Hydric soils? Basis HYDROLOGY Inundated?Depth of standing water Saturated soils? Depth to saturated soils Describe obvious topographic features,if any: Wetland hydrology? Basis Normal Circumstances? Atypical situation? Wetland determination Basis Comments: rIE LAND DETERMINATION MODIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH Date I Staff SSC Plot # VEGETATION g Status % cover Herbs Status % coverTre o tl sppCS(:ck 4:4' Ott -col Sq 10 0 sc 6-N/ cet") — i4 or 0 Pou Irho<w4i4 FAC IUD 0 Atuiv2Y SPA' a(Nvccta 2 qb 0 0 p114 An l 1 avim rn C1/4A, .S ,o 0 0 Grro,M spp • NO -l- — z.+o 0 Shrubs Status % cover 0 O000u5 SI4miCtAA F4c 7Av 0 0 0 0 0 0 of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: So cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: Hydrophytic vegetation? SOILS cgries/Phase On hydric soils list? iorizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample Soil type: (sand,clay, etc.) B horizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample_ Soil type: (sand,clay, etc.) Gleyed? Other incIcators Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration Approximate %organic content (by volume) Texture Hydric soils? Basis HYDROLOGY Inundated?Depth of standing water Saturated soils? Depth to saturated soils Describe obvious topographic features, if any: Wetland hydrology? Basis Normal Circumstances? Atypical situation? Wetland determination Basis Comments: TIAND DETERMINATION MODIFIED TRIPLE PARAMETER APPROACH Site CO Date `r(Vi€ Staff 5-5C Plot # 7 VEGETATION Trees Status % cover Herbs Status % cover 0 nws 764A/4 C P 50 0 0 0 pMai c ot4 p 0 c YI 0-ktw1 l 90-o p 0 Lf-u s CO n r a lu two r Syo 0 Shrubs Status % cover 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: cover of OBL, FACW, and/or FAC species: -D Hydrophytic vegetation? SOILS Pc'ries/Phase On hydric soils list? iorizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample Soil type: (sand,day,etc.) B horizon: depth matrix color mottle color depth of sample_ Soil type: (sand,day,etc.) Gleyed? Other indicators Depth of dominant vegetation root penetration Approximate %organic content (by volume) Texture Hydric soils? Basis HYDROLOGY Inundated?Depth of standing water Saturated soils? Depth to saturated soils Describe obvious topographic features, if any: Wetland hydrology? Basis Normal Circumstances? Atypical situation? Wetland determination Basis Comments: sT or-, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 4? SEATTLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS n P O. BOX C-3755 n SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98124.2255 per ra r.[M riots 0I I Regulatory Branch Mr. Warren C. Pugh The Austin Company 800 Southwest 16th Street Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Pugh: This is in reply to your September 28, 1988, letter and enclosed wetland report concerning development of your property at Renton, Washington. You requested that we determine whether the site is considered wetlands under our regulatory authority.. Department of the Army regulations dated November 13, 1986, authorize certain activities under nationwide permits. Paragraph 330.5(a)(26) of these regulations authorizes discharges of dredged or fill material intonontidalrivers, streams, and their lakes and impoundments, includingadjacentwetlands, that are located above the headwaters (where the averageannualflowislessthan5c.f.s.). Similar discharges are also allowed into other nontidal waters of the United States that are not part of asurfacetributarysystemtointerstatewatersornavigablewatersoftheUnitedStates (i.e. , isolated waters). The discharge area must be less than1acre. Based on the information you provided, neither the soils nor hydrologyofferdefinitiveexclusionfromorinclusioninthewetlandcategory.However, the project site does contain wetland vegetation. Because theareainquestionislessthan1acreinsize, filling of the project sitewillbeauthorizedbytheabovenationwidepermitandnoindividualDepartmentoftheArmypermitwillberequired, provided the enclosednationwidepermitconditionsaremet (enclosure 1). Wetlands, however, aredynamicecosystemsandarehighlysubjecttochange. The Federalregulationsgoverningdevelopmentarealsosubjecttochange. Thisdeterminationshouldbeconsideredvalidforonly1year. Nothing in this letter shall be construed as excusing the Austin CompanyfromcompliancewithotherFederal, state, and local statutes, ordinances,and regulations which may pertain to this work. If you have any questionsconcerningtherequirementsofnationwidepermits, please contact Mr. RudyPojtinger, telephone (206) 764-3495. Sincerely, Thomas F. Mueller RFCEIVE7-1 Chief, Processing Section Enclosure THE AUSTIN CO. NATIONWIDE PERMIT CONDITIONS FOR SPECIFIC CATEGORIES OF ACTIVITIES For purposes of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 3, 1899, and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the following special conditions must be satisfied prior to any discharge of dredged or fill materials associated with the activities performed under the authority of nationwide permits for specific categories of discharges: 1) That any discharge of dredged or fill material will not occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake; 2) That any discharge of dredged or fill material will not occur in areas of concentrated shellfish production unless the discharge is directly related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized by a nationwide permit; 3) That the activity will not jeopardise a threatened or endangered species as identified under the Endangered Species Act, or destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such species. In the case of Federal agencies, it is the agencies' responsibility to comply with the requirements of the act; 4) That the activity shall not significantly disrupt the movement of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the vaterbody (unless the primary purpose of the fill is to impound water); 5) That any discharge of dredged or fill material shall consist of suitable material free from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts; 6) That any structure or fill authorized shall be properly maintained; 7) That the activity shall not occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System nor in a "study river" designated by Congress for possible inclusion; 8) That the activity shall not cause as unacceptable interference with navigation; 9) That, if the activity may adversely affect historic properties which the National Park Service has listed on, or determined eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places, the permittee will notify the District Engineer; 10) That the construction or operation of the activity will not impair,. reserved tribal rights, including, but not limited to, reserved water rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights; 11) That in certain states, an individual state water quality certifica- te:4 must be obtained or waived; 12) That in certain states, an individual state coastal zone management consistency concurrence must be obtained or waived; 13) That the activity will comply with regional conditions which may have been added by the Division Engineer; and 14) That the management practices listed in Section 330.6 of this part shall be followed to the maximum extent practicable. In addition to the conditions specified above, the following management practices should be followed, to the maximum extent practicable, in the dis- charge of dredged or fill material under nationwide permits in order to mini- mize the adverse effects of these discharges on the aquatic environment. Failure to comply with these practices may be cause for the District Engineer to recommend or the Division Engineer to take discretionary authority to regulate the activity on an individual or regional basis: 1) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States shall be avoided or minimised through the use of other practical alternatives. 2) Discharges in spawning areas during spawning seasons shall be avoided. 3) Discharges shall not restrict or impede the movement of aquatic species indigenous to the raters or the passage of normal or expected high flows or cause the relocation of the water (unless the primary purpose of thefillistoimpoundwaters). 4) If the discharge creates an impoundment of water, adverse impacts on the aquatic system caused by the accelerated passage of water and/or the restriction of its flow, shall be minimised. 5) Discharge in wetlands areas shall be avoided. 6) Heavy equipment working in wetlands shall be placed on mats. 7) Discharges into breeding areas for migratory waterfowl shall be avoided. 8) All temporary fills shall be removed in their entirety. 2 r CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: Au. r o vY,-, •„ APPLICATION NUMBER: SA—a3o—e5/ • The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER Frank J. & John H. Powers , Jr. P.O. Box 508 334-040-4035-06 Renton , WA 98055 Bayside Properties, Inc. P.O. Box 3308 334040-3885-09 Redmond, WA 98073 Patricia Ann McIntyre Physics Dept. 334040-3805-06 University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 TheBoeing Company P.O. Box 3707 334040-4000-07 Renton Realty PTE Ltd. M/S 1F-09 Seattle, WA 98124 Puget Sound Power & Light TCO 17-1325 334040-4005-02 Puget Power Bldg. Bellevue , WA 98009 E.I. Richards 1402 22nd N.E. , #440 334040-5191-37 Auburn, WA 98002 334040-5140-05 334040-5125-04 334040-5105-08 • Group Health Cooperative Controller's Office 334040-5300-01 521 'Wall Street Seattle, WA 98121 The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 334040-3320-02 Equity Valley I Venture M/S 1F-09 Seattle, WA 98124 Valley Office & Ind. Park 3650 Mayfield Road 334040-3325-07 Cleveland, Ohio 44121 The Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street 334040-6430-02 Mr. Paul Chiado Renton, WA 98055 1, NINORE Old, cm of5 ,l'At1/4 2 2 19B9 s ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CERTIFICATION I.._Robert Snyder . hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for,the State of Washington residing at on the gb _day of 11 l;% e/47/LA7SIGNED: CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I• a,,,,A '. or . hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject sitE plan approval were mailed on Ap'- L 241 to each listed adjacent property owner aE prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public, and for the State of Washington residing at j'on the day of ig89 SIGNED: 2.axlJ u., • ems FORM 208 A SEATTLE WALL SYSTEMS, INC. BUILDING LIST OF DRYVIT PROJECTS IN RENTON VICINITY NEW/RETROPROJECT/ ARCHITECT/ CONST. DATE COLOR/FINISHLOCATIONAPPLICATORPRODUCTSD. FT. BLACK RIVER CORPORATION LPN ARCHITECTS N VAN DYKE SB1000-1100 OAKESDALE AVE. GORDON BROWN 1988RENTONWAOUTSULATION 2,000 ERNST HARDWARE BAYLESS ARCHITECTS N 1C-39-6-17-1 SB14058PETROVITSKYRDGORDONBROWNINC. 1985RENTONWA 4,000 EXIT 7 PROJECT DOUGLAS MULVANNEY ARCH. N MANOR WHITE OP7RENTON44TH WA KELLY PLASTERING 1988 FINISHER 3,250 RENTON 44 BAYLIS N 2C-74-2-24-1 SB1405 & 405ON 44TH WA WALL FINISHES 1986 2CC-74-2-24-2-SBR12,000 RENTON COMMUNITY CENTER MORSE/STAFFORD PARTNERSHIP422 RENTON SO.THIRD WA ACTION STUCCO RENTON FAMILY CLINIC CRAIG LAWSON ARCH. 443535TWIILLIAMS SO. LONG BUILDING SPEC. WA RENTON SAFEWAY STORE MORSE/STAFFORD PARTNERSHIPUNIONAVENE & NE 4TH J. J. JEFFERSONRENTONWAr' RENTON VALLEY 405, PHASE II LPN ROYCE BERG N VAN DYCK SBJ. J. JEFFERSON 1987RENTONWAOUTSULATION 3,000 RENTON VOC-TECH CAMPANELLA GROUP N 4C-87-11-21-2C OF30004THAVENUEGILBERTH. MOEN 1987-88 4C-87-11-21-1A OFRENTONWAFINISHER1, 100,00 SHERATON •INN RESTAURANT (ADD. ) CALLISON PARTNERSHIPRAINIERAVE & SO GRADY WAY RENTON WA VALLEY 405 LPN N BRANDYWINE SB981POWELLAVE. S.W. O'MALLEY PLASTERING 1986 VAN DYKE SBRENTONWA11, 000 VALLEY MEDICAL CTR SUBSTATION MAHLUM & NORDFORS R 9C-62-5-20-1 SB400S. 43RD NW CAMPBELL 1988RENTONWAOUTSULATION 2,500 Valley Medical Center 12C-14-1-31-1PsychiatricWingJ.J. Jefferson & Son 12C-14-1-31-7400S. 43rd Renton, WA i EXHIBIT NO. r ITEM NO. SA - CL3® ® e MEASUREMENT ROD, 1/2"0 PIPESETTELMENTPLATENOTES: CASING, 2"0 PIPE 40 20 0 40 80 cSET.ON PLATE, NOT FASTENED)m m RRR1. INSTALL MARKERS IN FIRM GROUND OR ON SAND PADS IF NEEDED FOR STABILITY. Ty MI TAKE INITIAL READING ON TOP OF ROD AND 0.T ADJACENT GROUND LEVEL PRIOR (n COUPLING, WELDED TO PLATETOPLACEMENTOfANYFILL. SETTLEMENT PLATE SCALE:I•=40'-0• THE MUST I N I WEST va coR.HOLMES 2. FOR EASE IN HANDLING.ROD AND CASING ARE USUALLY INSTALLED IN 5-FOOT 16"X 16"X 1/4"SECTIONS.AS FILL PROGRESSES,COUPLINGS ARE USED 70 INSTALL ADDITIONALICOMPANYSECTION19-23-5 Ex.Hs.CONTINUITY IS MAINTAINEDNCD B READING THE TOP O THE MEASUREMENT W SAND PAD IF NECESSARY SEATT R 1ICONC. MON,ELECT R 1 C RW THEN IMEDIATELY ADDING THE NEW SECTION AND READING THE TOP OF THE I EXEXISTING GROUND LUMBERADDEDROD.BOTH READINGS ARE RECORDED. Q I SURF CEIlRECORDTHEELEVATIONOFTHETOPOFTHEMEASUREMENTRODINEACHBARKERATIIIII I THE RECOVVENDED TILE INTERNALS.EACH TILE.NOTE THE ELEVATION OF THE I CE.Q 1..,AEADCTHE MARER TILLOATHiNEREST0T 1 F OT, SETTLEMENT IIPi'IN I d. READ THE WRKCR i0 THE NEAREST 0.01 FOOT,OR 0.0p5 FONT IF POSSIBLE.NOTE W_—_ ITHF LATE DETAILIWCALE: NONE 4 J 17.00)I 1Tfi7) 20.58 22.06) 22.W - 1027.81' -N 89° 3_5' 25" E SW 16 H STREET 1 6' SIDEWALK EASEMENT 1.6_.7 16.6W - - (17.7) 59) 16.8A <1.71) 1fl..98)f 20.05) ( 03) O r ii yy U\ , 202.87' -- 240.17' N 89° 35' 25" E O EQ, / o D /g3' 30'/PUCE) POKER j_ 32.SX 5.0' N 01° 222_58'%£___-- 412..89 r E%IST. CONC. CURB-----` -0 ) I EASEMENT_ UN RCROUND- -10' LANDSCAPING EASEMENT 5A 2)\BO-- /I I ELECT CAL EASEMENT I-E%I ST. 6' CONC.y SIDEWALK (I17. 40 ( 6.8) ( L------''''''I1 M 3pEKL 15p X 8" E10L UNDERGROUND STRI PI NG LIMIT EE I x x x A x ( 4" TO 6" (-) ELECTRICAL EASEA£NT QUARRY SPACES TE4R'ORARY DRAINAGE oISHALE(TYPICAL) j I wl 1 zl TIrJ ofSWALER(TmYFD iNAGE :7 PUGET POWER 1 IIISUBSTATION II n TOE OF SLOPE(TIP) `- I18.23) a 181.79) \ I I Imo^f\SLOPE 2:1 MAX. g,dp) I(IIB 68 o J j 1 } SETTLEMENT PLATE N I/ / IIWo I 11 f, 1-*-r TYPICAL(SEE DETA Y Q zi I T6l___J, 12" CONC. 1 T7._ t- ,i THIS DWG) Y I I F7 T EXISTING._ CULVERT IN 9j I I I,j, 0^ J 25' DRAINAGE-- 112" CAP OUT INV. 14.0' I I f Z o \ A\ EASEMENT I INV. 14.0' JI I GROUP o Y7 x x x x \ N.RCRGE AA— W TOP CC i'-• (19-\-`_— _ ___. _. N 89'-7S'_2i"-._ _ I\1 `T l,1‘ MI NPE(TOYP% 8. 0)'(17 93jI18.68) I .I(19.26) T ,n o w 7q 1 REMOVE EXIST. 1 ! o N v/,/- I BOE I NG i SD&CB -(18)'- 1 r Roko F COMPUTER j Y 8 180 I I `\\ 10-o I ELECT I"L TIAS8I NI,I SERV I CES 12"CM SD 12"CM SD ( EXIST. 3/4" CONDUIT I ; /30+-0" T J I • I Lid TO BE REMOVED(TYP) T p,)1 10' C UND RGROUNDd I i o 1 / 91 Io INiNNEXIST. LIGHT STD'S Q a CISILTCONTROLFENCETOBEREMOVED(TYP) 6 I I 1 ALL SIDES OF EXI S1'- n .. 186'-0"I18.36)I( 8.97)CATCH BASIN 20 FT SO NOTE: I TYPICAL 2 PLACES) I SLOPE 2:1 MAX. J _ I(13.6P) (I7.•') N !/ REMOVE REMAINDER OF CATCH BASINS&STORM DRAIN I TOE F SLOPE(TYP) WHEEL WASH PIPING AFTER COA/PLETION OF J I I30'X 150'X 8" SITE PREPARATION EXIST. 1-1/2" CONDUIT 1 )--1- I: QUARRY SPALLS 1 8> - TO BE REMOVED Q REMOVE_B.EXI ST_ LA 12"CM SD 12"CM SD I r17.9\ 17 17.6a y(n.7o)r 19.97) 17.20) 17.80) I7.70) (17.70)/ 962 90' -N 89° 49' 01"W 17.60) 17.60) C I7.70) s(17.80) f D 18 )/ VALLEY OFFICE PARK r1EROSIONCONTROLNOTES: 4X4 POSTS 4'0.C.MA%. al FILTER FABRIC 3 C-3 5. IN ANY AREA WHICH HAS BEEN STRIPPED OF VEGETATION AND WHERE I IIfORMETALSTAKESALLLIMITSOFCLEARINGANDAREASCONSTRUCTIONOFCLEARLYEIONPRESERVATION3. THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL M SYSTEM DEPICTED ON NO FARTHER WORK IS ANTICIPATED FOR A PERIOD OF 30 DAYS ORIASLDPRANDIBEDONTHEPLANSHALLBEFLAGGEDINTHETHISIPATEDGAREINTENDEDIS.AS MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO ANDDS IpRE,ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOSE BE ILAEDIATELY STABILIZEDWITH7'", I DITCH FLOW FIELD OBSERVED DURING CONSTRUC71W ANTICIPATEDED SITE SONOIT IONS.AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSESNIWIREMESHFENCEILINENEXPCETEDORSEASONALCONDITIONSDICTATE.THE CONTROLTEE SMALL CONTROLA.TREATMENTLEECHING.GRASS PLANING OR OTHER APPROVEDA EROSION2'-0'I I 2. ALL REWIRED PRIORT SEDIMENTATION/EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES MUST BE ANTICIPATE THAT LORE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES CONTROLSEEDING EM E I AC i0 THE TIME OF YEAR IN QUESTION.IN OPERATION PRIOR TO LAND CLEARING AND/OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION WILL BE NECESSARY TO INSURE COMPLETE SILTATION CONTROL ON THE GRASS ALONE WILL BE ACCEPTABLE ONLY DURING THE MONTHS I I FLOW TYP) 4"(-) ROCK I. I_ POST TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENT LADEN WATER DOES NOT FA ENTER THE NATURAL PROPOSED SITE DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION,IT SHALL OF APRIL THROUGH SEPTELIBIN INCLUSIVE.SEEDING MAY DONATED,DIRECTION II DITCH FLOW LINE I I SILT FENCE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT FACILITIES SHAH BE BE THE OBLIGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERYITTEE TO HCMEVER.WHENEVER IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF THE PREMITIEE. MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CONDITION UNTIL SUCH TILE THAT ADDRESS ANY NEW O PROVIDE THAT MAY BE CREATED BY HIS BUT COST DE AUGMENTED MILCHI NG,NETTING,OR OTHER µ,q'' I II I L-TOP OF DITCH CLEARING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND POTENTIAL FOR ACTIVITIES AND 10 PRO/IDE ADDITIONAL FACILITIES.DYER AND TREATMENT APPROVED BY THE CITY OF DEMON,OUTSIDE THE V RH''SPECIFIED TIME PERIOD. J r'd•`t''•tr''MIIIIQ 'WELy I I ON-SITE EROSION H45 PASSED.THE IMPLEMENTATION.MAINTENANCE, ABOVE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.AS MAY BE NEEDED TO PROTECT I I I lrjx 10 VA.I•' REPLACEMENT,AND ADDITIONS 10 EROSION/SEDIMEMAT ION CONTROL ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND WATER DUALITY OF THE RECEIVING Q f:I A.w°SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTED. DRAINAGE SYSTEM. 6. FOR ALL EROSION/SEEDS NA ION CONTROL PONDS WHERE THE DEAD t (' STORAGE DEPTH EXCEEDS 6',A FENCE.A MINIMAL OF 3 FEET HIGH L .,F- 4. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS FOR EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL IS REQUIRED.WITH}:I SIDE SLOPES. µ=;-, ,40(.. .g:• 24 19 SECTION n TYP. SILT FENCE PLAN ONLY,IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF SOCK HMNTL GE Z A TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.30'N SD'X B"OF 4-TO 6-DESIGN, 25 30 SCALE:NONE OR RETENTIONNORACILITIESLOCATION OF PIPES,RESTRI Ci Ofls,CHANNELS,INCH QUARRY SPACES SHALL BE LOCATED AT ALL POINTS OF VEHICULAR M.71 L*_.`SCALE:NONEC-3 C-3 INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. NOTES DATE BEY ISION BY CRAB DATE REVISION BY CHAO SCALE 1"=40-0" TITLE SITE PREP. & EROSION CONTROL PLAN ..O ND. 89-5477aTHEAUSTINaCARD COMPANY DATE 04-20-89 DINER G.S.A.SHUT C-3 07-10-89 A ISSUE FOR BLDG. PERMIT RAK PRA CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS CARD RAK A06-09-89 ISSUE FOR BIDS AND PURCHASING RAK PRA ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS PAVE 06-30-89 LBE.B AN 1601 L I ND AVE SW, NEKTON. WA. I66UE STUJO.D!04 89d477.3 C 3 RIp.MK REV A OR-11-9R 40 20 0 40 e0 116SCALE:I =40'-0 THE MUST I N IWEST 1/4 COR.HOLMESSECTION9-23-5 I w S EAT T L ECOMPANYIIcoNc. MON.ELECTRIC I ., I LUMBER I I I I s. I a I f:;.j'. I I I w ----- ---i,;..,..,.. .a. N, eh'-- C 17.OW 1T77) 20.58 22.06) 22.9) 1027.81' -N 89° 35' 25" E SW 1 6T H STREET T I -7 6' SI DEWTLK EASEMENT`- L16.-7-2)16.69)\ 17.167) f&59) 16.87) (1,.71) r( 16.98)J 20.05) ( .03) in,o , -- o ELECTRICAL EASE Lgti°©cam\ 82-87' n 32.54, " - l7Ojh' 301/PUGEi POWER EASEMENT .- B %J- 10' UNDERGROUND- -10' LANDSCAPING EASEMENT B SIDEWALKEXIST. 6' CONC.17.40) 116.87 19.0 ' 19.E T- I ELECTRICAL EASEMENT I19.0 20.00 zj'C" KT501920.00 E{- n T/F 18.0 / 1 C I II r N T/F 18.0[1 I,I, i r-B- I w I W f, I 18.50./T I I i O- 19 0 19.50 -9CU o• I - ofV ,\ I, I PUGET POWER Ilol L I ® 5\ O T/F\;a. N9.00 x SUBSTATION 9.50 zo.00/ 18.75\\ 19.50 19.5018-23) .i 19.50 v I I I18 68 LIDg I 19.50 °" 1 04---_-__-__.---_ I ENfRANCE1r-1 I IIZ '.III_-___J A 19.50 Q II O6j J r 12" CONC. j71' Jivu+J - r 1850 Y T/F 18.0 J" CULVERT IN s I \n 7/J_ 112" CMP OUT INV. 14.0'l COURTYARD I I I l W Zo e I I INV. 14.0\= x t.I i; GROUP O n Y7 x KANN J EL21.50 19.50 HEALTH is.so I Q 1,\1" - ----- I I 440:17'_ N 89°_35'-25",E-Y 1 18.68) I i7 '(19) - ------ C OFFICE BUILDINGI9.50 M 19.50 19 50 8. 0)17 93 18.79J I. -- - - fO= - IN. FLR EL. 21.75 B0E I NGa.5u j I C TER I IL 1N.o I" I L 9.0 V 1L -.,,,,EIDT SERVICES 19.25 T/F 18.0 93 T/F 18.0 El Ci'I L EASEF M 19.0 12.30IC/ 1 _pe.so to-e°\ I i 10' UNDERGROUND I lo" I- \Jl I \ t f 1 n T/F 18.0 / _ ELECTRI L EASEMENT i it-K.,. GRASS SWALEI pI Ip Iz. 8.50 18.50 II 18.50 J r TO/ cI 18.36) 18 79) 1/F 18.0 T/F 18.0- 19.0 18.75 9'.0 18.61) ' (1'7.47)I____ T/F 18.0 19.0 - 19.00 j 21.00 21.75 18.60/1 1 T/F 18.0 19.5O ' 18.50 \ 8.50 \_ 1 m -\__--_ 20.50 1 I{ <1 7) 00lih `0Y 19.25 19.50 19.25 19.50 , 19.50 19.50 __- __ S'j'9.50 19.25 19.50' 18.50\ T/F 18.0 /18`500 T/F 18.0 / T/F 18.0 / T/F 18.0 / T/F 18.0 / 1 \ T/F 18.0 1, 18.50 18.50 18.50 118.50 18.50 Icn.9\ I / i I/ (9+) I(18.- 17.20) 17.80) 17.70) (17.70) 962.90' -N 89° 49' 01"W 17.60) 17.60) 17.70) 17.80) r U > ° VALLEY OFFICE PARK EXIST. 10' LANDSCAPING STRIP PROVIDE 15" HIGH CONC. CURB r ITOPOFPAVEMENTEL. 18.542TOPOFCURBEL. 19.0 I I I 22 I I- II 6" 1 3'-0" (MAX.)1 I i i a 2' VARIES 3' 1' 2% I R.•••a, SECTION B 2'6'1' VARIES 3'SECTIONn 7 % _ 24 19 SCALE:NONE C-4 C-a S.Z..;.1,- N.a;.25 30 SCALE:NONE C-4 C-4 W FSypR ,. NOTES DATE REVISION BY MD DATE REVISION BY CHxD a f11 THE AUSTIN SCALE 1"=4°-0" TITEE GRAD I NG PLAN ND. 89-5477 C' CADD COMPANY DATE 04-20-89 aYNER G.S.A. SHEET C-4 07-10-NO A ISSUE FOR BI DG. PERMIT RAH PRA CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS E'XD RAK A 06-09-89 ISSUE FOR BIDS AND PURCHASING RAK PRA ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS WTE O6-}O-a9 lOCAn a1 1601 L I ND AVE SW, RENTON, WA. :5 pI 40 20 0 40 80 lit)1) THE AUST I N I j--WEST 1/4 COR.HOLMES SCALE:1 =da'-a° sfcrloN I9-2 3-5 I w I SEATTLECOMPANYIItort. NON. ELECTRIC I a I LUMBER I I 1 a7 1 I I J w 1 ---- r I-Z 18"SS-- --- 18"SS-T- -OBU -- 16"SS-- VI N e I 1027.81' -N 89° 35' 25" E SW 1_6T H STREET I - P 6' SIDEWALK EASEMENT 1 Zy'L©2 2.54 °• __ 7 I 1y. 30'PUGET POKER EASEMENT L'5.0' -N 01° 22' 58" E 412.89' EXIST. CONC. CURB---1- I B 10' UNDERGROUND -10' LANDSCAPING EASEMENT I p), 1EXIST. 6' -- ------} --- - 1 ELECTRICAL EASEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK I ICB.T/F.18.00 I E IINV12'15.40 CB TYPE 2 T/F 18_00 10' UNDERGROUND E N N N N N INV E IB" 14.50 ELECTRICAL EASEMENT CB T/F_18.00 17=1 I' x INV S 24" 14.50 INV 12"15.40 I I N REF. C-A) _ 0 ' t18"CM SL 0.30%125LF lit 12"CM SL 0.307.ISOLF / I 3 0 0 CB-TYPE 2 T/F 18_00_ I( IJJD'-INxPUGETPOWERx //1 2' ENV E iz" 1a.ai 9 CB_T/F I8,00 I o t of INV W 18" 14.87 m x SUBSTATION x awo110 Q ^ La" IS" ci . N GO . BUILDINGI QI o I ECCENTRIC \ ^ J I -25' DRAINAGE x 12" CONC.' x r , J DETAIL ENTRANCEM I A I I INV. 15.06 I EASEMENT x o l__ _ I_ .____4-__,-__- .{ h REDUCER f- CULVERT IN CB T/F 18.00 112 Ch1P OUT INV. 14.0 I I I!' Q 0 < ---- INV 12" 15.40 LI INV- 14 0 x I _ LIFT ST I ION SC-' GROUP I 6'• SSENVsr.012" 1cM2'-- o --- N N N N N i DETA Q ENV. 1i-OD' JU--I N BO%_, X1 w n 12" X 18"HEALTH o z I ---___• - __ IL I CONTROL/BYPASSCONHOLELJ I>....ECCENTRIC REDUCER 12" CMP-- ilEXST. Mi o RFF. SHT C 6)\ I 5C-9 s,°INV. 14.90INV. i1.9 o 240.17' N 89° 36' 25 E NLW 1"VIMOFEL. 18 63 - I OFFICE BUILDING I INV. 12"(S) 9.93 I J.CNVT 12 185 40 IrID 12-154if -- r24" CM SL 0.509.20LF FIN. FLR. EL 21.75 y'(3 I I /I BOE I NG 1 CB T/F 18.00 CB T/F 18.00 DETAIL MH T/F 19_50___ Og a.- I COMPUTER i 7 12"CM SL SS0. SW 340 LF A C-• OIL/WATER1 ONC L SEPARATOR110 38LF 4 OR 13LF INV N 24'`13.82 10'_-Nr RCC:1,D GRASS SWALE _ 12"CM SL 1.107.70LF : 410 0 INV W 24" 13.08 oE CT IIL ST NI I SERV I CESINV1 5 C_g 13 ) INV S 24" 13.08 CB T/F 18.00 E CTRNCA L EASEMENT UND ---- - 2 S0.30%2-> INJ12"15.40 / Ir I I NV 12" 15.40 IT1, 12"CM SL 1'S18'CM SL 0.30%1}. 5 LJ 24"CM SL 0.307 . alI_' 10. CM X LI1 BW. ELBS10.51'i, d -I 1• 14 -- -- S 0.30 35LF I TOP 24' 15.34 I _ o MH T/F 19.00 4" M s rZ 1.s F E.INV. SW it 11.60\I o C 12'CM SL 0.30%23LF I N n F 18.00 4. MH 1" s B TYPE 2 T/F 18.00 24"cm TYPE 2 T/F 18.00 12"CM IINV. E 18" 1 I1 14.7470 B p" 15.40 ` INV E IS" 14.51 14.61 r-14.12- CM SL 0.309°198LF INV W 24" 14.02 SL 0.307.45LF oINV. NE 12" I I o I -- c INV W 12" 15.01 _---._- - INV ES 12" 15.10_ T/ 19 y A01 T/F 18.0000 INV N 2 IS 10 i--- - F -10 LL li I INV S 12" 15.01 INV E 4" 14.12 INV N 4' 1T1: 24" M SL 0.30%1,192LF I, INV N 18" 14 69 18" CONC. SL 0,50% 1 LJT --.- - V. J INV " 1 19 1Iw2aa E g I. S 12" 15 55 LF I i IMF BOT 12" 15.36I BOT 12" 15.36`_ TOT IB" 15.39 ci z0 INVLW(2''T/1T850Q T .i \ n I Cl TOP 12" 14.85 \ N s o sITOP18" 13.65 n, TOP 18" 14.43 F INV N 12" 14.65 CB_T/F 18 00_ nCBT/F 18.00_ INV E 12" 13. 60 86 INV 12" 15.40 586 C0_T/F 18.00 1I' 1 t INV12"13.90 \ IWE24" 13. 46 APPROXIMATE PAVEMENT/SI DEENALK I ' NV 122 15.40REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT LIMITS I1 Era 18" CONC. SL 0.50%255 LF 18" CONC. SL 0.50%198 LF',illSEENOTEZ) J I1I - o '--I-- IB Tt2"f5 40 CM 1/F^1185 40 TWE788_304963 962.90-N 89° 49' 01"W ` T/ N 18505.70 EXISTING 10• NVT 12" 85 05 INV. W 18" 15.60 LANDSCAPING STRIP \-PROVIDE 15" HIGH CONC. CURB II T. 1A1T/FF EC 18.46 TOP OF PAVEMENT EL. (18.5) 1W. 12"(E) 11.34 TOP OF CURB EL. (19.0) III I E2CLSL_MH_- 11r I I INV. 12"(N) 11.33 I IT/F EL. 17.92 I I' I NOTES: IINV. 12"(E) 10.10 I IIINV. 12"(W) 10.07 I II I 1.ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL BE TYPE IA(WSDOT STD.)R,A•••I NV. 12"(M 9.43 I I I VALLEY OFFICE PARK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I I J ......., tirINV. 21••(S) 9.33 J 11 , I I I I - -.. _ rs tiy,r•, INV. 18" NE(NEW) 11.34 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN RAYMOND AVE. S.W. o.T 4 C+RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL COI.IPLY WITH CITY OF T /• ',•_:• 24 19,RENTON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 7r's:`'Sa 25, y SEE DWG. T-2 FOR NOTES. UXiG;:9 i`'r NOTES DATE REVISION BY PHNP DATE REVISION IN CKKO SCALE I•'=ao-o" TITEE STORM DRAINAGE & SANITARY SEWER PLAN A.o.No. 89-5477aTHEAUSTINBrCADD COMPANYDATE 04-20-89 PARER G.S.A. SHEET C--5 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS Onco RAK A07-10-89 A ISSUE FOR BLDG. PERMIT RAK PRA ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS DATE 06-30-89 EouTIPN 1601 L I ND AVE SW, RENTON. WA. IssPE 5 scum os°s es=s°i>:z M,11N AVRN REv or 47.. - 40 20 0 40 60 (SyNEmNEm N SCALE:1 +o'-o° THE AUST I N I I- WEST 1/4 CDR. I wHOLMES I SEATTLETLE I SECTION 19-23-5COMPANYIIcovc. MON.ELECTRIC I ¢ I LUMBER IecIII 3 jW1IIfI— 18„SS- 18SS- —O 18•SS— N ---__ 1027.81' -N 89° 35' 25" E SW 1_BT H STREET STA.4+73.0+/- - I EXIST. 12"CI-W EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT 6R05 DEWALK PIPEPLI NE GAS - 12%10 TAPPING OLYEPIC -GAS- 6' SIDEWALK EASEMENT GAS GAS-12"CI-W— ---- LYMAIC2'CI-W_ rPIPELINE_` -- PIP e XIST- PUGET POKE El_l EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT EXIST SIDEWALK1yh30' PUGET POWER EASEMENT LANDSCAPI.i 1II 11 412.89' EXIST. POWER POLE ` G e i EXIST. CONC. CURB 10' UNDERGROUND 10 LANDSCAPING la L IANDSCAPI NG Bo) I /E%I ST. 6' CONE. } I ELECTRICAL EASEMENT EASEMENT I SIDEWALK I I I in' 10' UNDERGROUND E I III n x x x- x x x W i, a,,, `-STA.4+65.0+/- ELECTRICAL EASEMENT EI II I 2" BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY 1 AFTER REO'D TESTING I IITI'I REMOVE&INSTALL L.P. II I 3 I, I r x U o PIPE SLEEVE iiiI P1,6 ' Y ° rNW1wPUGETPOWER - i I 1 2 O o w ^ Hi SUBSTATION . — z I m BUIL.INC )NTH II o If I , ill ,O NII - I x I I .ExISTINI w EASEMENTNA6E- I II I .. GROUP < eI x x x x x 2a0.17' -N 89° 35' 25" E _- r.__III y.°. j n III. OFFICE BUILDING M I ' dl FIN. FLR. EL. 21.75 T 7 .,..-;iAEE I ic>HEALTH o 12" cMP-- i 1 3' IRRIGATION 13AGRII- I I II I BOE I NGI • - ' p 1 II— — STA. 0+50.0 FLOW PREVENTOR I I DETA I L 10%4 TEE(MI) THRUST BLOCK 3" IRRIGATION 4" COMPOUND WATER METER -6 1 I COMPUTER EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT- 4" GATE VALVE(MJXFL) WATER METER WITH 4" BYPASS Ij I I. RCo D 4X3 REDUCER(MIXFU I I Ec1 I .L A 'SERVICES I n 120'LT1 TOTWESTION WFACE OF VAULT 1 I I E%I ST. FIRE HYDRANT 10' EIc+L EROUND J Tyf.LECfICaI EASEMEMdl I--r- - I`I y"v1 I MLi STA. 0+40.0 I .DER . i ___ - __ - 1 I I0X6 TEE(MI) THRUST BLOCK6" I III 6" D.DECALVASSEMBLY 138' LT 1 4"DWG 6"F IN TO WEST FACE OF VAULT L_ I I II EXIT. L IGH1 STANDARD PROPOSED 24' I I El ,1 TOE R[LOCATED ACCESS RIVE I I ( _ 3 W 1 . DETAIL L YL a - - •11STA. 0+45.0 1air10X4TEEEMI) THRUST BLOCK 1' 4 W 6„WI4" GATE VALVE(MI) L 6"X 1" DOUBLE DETECTOR C-6C-11..1 4"WM 130' LT CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY 1 III III TO WEST FACE OF VAULT- I_T 11_ EASEMENT II - -FIRES APPROVED) RICH ii 1 I I II10' tTNERM'AIN FIRE DEPT. PUMPER CONNECTION T EXIST. 10"WM STUB DETAIL 3I- o -- REM E+ELo- I REMOVE EXIST. 10" CAP AT PROPERTY LINE 6" FIRE HYDRANT 6 C- EXISTING IV' AT PROPERTY LINE EXIST. 10"WM E%MST. 10' LANDSCAPING STRIP EXISTING 24'IIIIACCESSDRIVErier- ACCESS DRIVE 1 I I ---- 150' I 485.0' +/- RI 1 1 I I II I EXISTING 24' 1 I VALLEY OFFICE PARK I I ACCESS DRIVE I 24 19 aA.` .4jT: 25 30 NOTES DATE REVISION er c1«o DATE REVISION or cwco " al THE AUSTIN SCALEEpp-0" rinE WATER MAIN PLAN w.o_o. 89-5477 COMPANYDATE 03-30-89 o,„.ER G.S.A.REAP C-6 07-10-89 A ISSUE FOR BLDG. PERMIT RAK PRA CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS cOxo RAK A 06-09-89 ISSUE FOR BIDS AND PURCHASING RAK PRA ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS NO uNOTE06-30-89 EoTIor+ 1 601 L I ND AVE SW, RENTON, WA. Iss A -- 12:1) 40 20 o 40' 80 I. THE AUST I N I HOLMES ul SCALE:1•=+o'-o WEST 1/4 CDR. f I SECTION 19-23-5 w SEATTLE COMPANY I I CONC. MDN. ELECTRIC 1 a I LUMBER 1 1 1 1 1 aT I 3DETAIL1I1HANDICAPRAMPC-7 A 1 24INEW24' ACCESS U I L Z DRIVE ASPHALT___ 18,SS__ --- 18"SS- 0O18"SS——U7 PAVNi T__ - T- 1 T—. 1027.81' N 89° 3_5' 25" E SW 16TH STREET i W CURB _ 6' SIDEWALK EASEMENT EXIST. FIRE HYDRANTNEW 6 SIDEWALK— GA &EGUTTR GA___ GAS-12"CI-W—OLYLIPIC- _GA$--_- --- -_ LY1. IC PIPELINE 12"•CI`.• O I ST. PUGET PONE PIPELINE-- 41' ,ti a\ 202 g7 y- 40-17' o\ EXIST SIDEWALK t 30' PUGET PUNER EASEMENT LANDSCAPIN;32.54 5.0' N 01° 22' 58" E -- 412.89' - SEXIST. POWER POLE I EXIST. CONC. CURB C L LAND-5 NG B. 10' UNDERGROUND- -10' LANDSCAPING EASEMENT I I Bp) IE%IST. 6' CONC.--+---- y--'- ELECTRICAL EASEMENT I + S IDEWALH 10' UNDERGROUND EE I I III I/IELECTRICALEASEMENT 1 Jr' I' W x M x .- M x W II yII J .4LxxII Tip. $I OEWALK C77 C- N N 6G1 d I N I x PUGET POWER x 71 0 o I IJ —1 ISUBSTATIONIj w _ IQ ° „v x x H BUILDING I I IJ 1 I ENTRANCE QDALI- O tEXIST ING I COURTYARD I I I, IcI25' DRAINAGE 11 ff" GROUP EASEMENT x . . , I a< . x J - I j QHEALTHp12" caw 4___° I 240.17' -N 89° 35' 25" E __141 I No -_ LANDSrAPI NG - IOFFICEBUILDING FIN. II I /I I BOEINGFLR. EL. 21.75 r- -1 r- -1 I, 11 , COMPUTER E°ICTAI R k°T I SERVICES 10' UNDERGROUND I.. _ __ J I ELEOTRIGIL EASEL NII'1 1 - YI LANDSCAPIYINIGj- 7I a I S I 1 I IIJIJL196.0' I PEW 0" H I 110 A K I NEW 24' ACCESS III I LANDSCAPING 1 r II 4TOEXI BE RELOCATEDSTANDARD DRIVE 1 — 1 i 5 d L i I I I I I:--_ 1 —.L P- I I I li 1 1 fz r I ` INEW 24'!ACCESS DRIVE 111 __I_— 962.90' 01-W 1 -- I-'I N RID -I- 1— T r 1 li I DETAIL I I EXIST. 10' LANDSCAPING STRIP I I CUR CUT(TYP) 7 C- XISTING 4' EXIST. 10"WM EXISTING 24'I IIIACCESSDRIVEACCESSDRIVEIIIII I' I VALLEY OFF ICE PARK C I I EXISTING 24'nil I, II I I -ACCESS DRIVE I I I 1 III I Y -..* @tiy5iLiINOTE: 11 I I l P f cad`: .,OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR r `f '.,I:rl 24 19 SW 16TH STREET SHALL BE 1'A'- ° t 25 30 CONSTRUCTED UNDER FUTURE G'.SW 16TH STREET L.I.D. 4,,l0 K,f R°TEs RATE REVISION r GHQ DATE REVISION of C13t0 / Q I T THE AUSTIN SCALE I"=4o-o rIrEE OFF-SITE I MPROVEMENT o.R°. 89-5477 Ll7-L'C/1 w CADD COMPANY RATE 04-20-89 a.RER G.S.A.SHEET C-7 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS Cxx° RAK 07-10-89 A ISSUE FOR BLDG. PERMIT RAK PRA ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS MTE 06-30-89 LOfir IIN 1 601 L I ND AVE SW, RENTON, WA. I:sue I 2 3 4 5 NOTES 0 0Q 0 0 0 Cr)0 A I I I I I I I I Vigirr !TY. WO all r--TOPaFPARAPET - IIEL.17T.6'- fh 7/\/\/ T\ '."—./ I, AT 1 1 ' B ERI.FLOOR I. i ,/ CI-Icitc.'- 1 I —i i _ 1 1 1 } 1— 1 1 1 1 L ' 1 ---Z L_ 1 1 1 _ T 1 I1 1 1 0i__1...___._ __ __i_1 _ Y NTN.FLOOR r EL•lai'-.I 1 I _ I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I _y 1 1 1 1 1 ,f I I 1 1 o— wsSwvEv pcTI4NL 1 I 1 3 4 OK UNO LI'1T•I _ .__ I I I— I 3RQ FLXRf E ' 1 1 1 _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ 1 y e 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 p F EL.1111•G lN\ I I I _. 1, t bUiP¢NDED II2NQ. LaaR v 1 O OIyTIOAI.4u.LTV.*u h C . 1 9' T i 1 —7 - 1 1 1 _ 1 1 L 1 1 1 \\ 1_-- t __ 1 Z I_I. 431v9LAMP,OSINN4 i AWOL cPA¢rRIQ rFINdLR.EL.IOOa' OFP J7 DCPRE55 BLAB wait 14'MORTAR biO T BBY NOTES: I'M FOUNENTIONS,SLABS,FOOTI144S, STBULTIRAL FW.MI444 A BSTAILS SEE STRUOTNRAL O(1AWINai, D ark BUILDING SECTION eaium Cr SCALE 4s°.I'-O' Tr" 7 0— DATA 1.10.4 MY C.AO DATE M.,e. C... An THE AUSTIN °`""h''I'' ''•,. BUILDING SECTION re S.c.E. COMPANY n S.Ss Orin. G.S.A. a,N'1 OT•li•M( GfJ IE'RAL awlibN I(, ENGINECONSULTANTB ARCHITECTS DATE LOCATION 1601 Lind Ave. S.W.. Renton, WA Iu.. AOS22-B9 ISSUE FON I1LUIa,F'EHMIT ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS 4 O Q n - n O n 0 O. O O O 5 O I I 246'-dn2-d A ALUM. r. I I r I- 1.o.p._ A To P. . UC RTAIN__ _I cJLRTAIN N WALL l I I I l I l I I.I I I I I I I I I I.l I I I.I I I WIsr rti FF WALL I I I I I I I I I I I I I t IIIIIII IIIIIII - 5„,R-rf , YS STEM: SYSTEM; VIIO5 VISION ISS p GLA S I I -0 I6LASSREL` I R'fU rIY.PP_r, SPANDRF1 I I A TA F e-PIP S\ I ASS I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I. P Pr s l l 1 I I I . - 11 l I IIIII I I 3 P_nit I I I I 2HP rw,.FPS_I 1 2NP rLC-.Fir, XTERIOR INSULATION EXTERIOR INSULATION J `L FINISH SYSTEM A•4 FINISH SYSTEM ApPIIP.OM- 3Gp.L.0 L I/IL? % I. _ O" gG...LE '. I/Iv" = I'- O., O ® © O O ® O la 0 ITa'.O' 246'-0r T-7 I- - I CK T•fl 1 _ I' T-• 1 l I .7. P. .t 1 I L 1, To.P. v CURTAIN I J ALUM. - __ WALL I e. GURTAIN p SYSTEM:/ SYSTEM:5 PLR.P.r VISION VISION 1- _ GLASS I. I I I 1 I ab w.rr0-6PANIXiEL .r._C•GLASSREL ' I.I I I I I l 1 I I I l 1 I I I I 15,M1,,rr I l I l l I I I I I I I I I I I _ I I l l l l l l l l l l l l l l *PpRa.P II I 11I I 1 II !1111 1 n e ! 1 II 1111 Il _ III ' ill I.1 2 or.rr _ 2 m r,.rr kift_ili 4.7., EXTERIOR INSULATIO XTERIOR INSULATION FINISH SYSTEM FINISH SYSTEM w i. .v_,,_-1- 1 o k. o_u.T M '. v p.T i_o i`J-. -. ..ZGALL" % I/IA' •= I - O° SGA.L.E• . I/4" • I' - on I NOTES on VISION SY VOW OATS MSNNO SI, ON= Q THE AUSTIN BUILDING ELEVATIONS • COMPANY o-. G.S.A.,a 61.T. I SIT.„A 4LN{RAL I,N 4411 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTO 05-22-S9 ISSUE FOR SI DG PERMIT SNOINECRO .CONSTRUCTORS °•„ m1601 Lind Ave. S.W., Renton. WA Of.e.a' IP'O. 7R rti 11,6.J.w....eo....?4,e•s.(t.) 47 S.W.ILO SWTEE It 1 1 IT' flamer wow+•re-11.41131., •NOP,P4 t."..x.e rah wit... 9-roo.,eis•••Ac4c.Won.",A.O.0•11.0 51.TM, F.-, :::win..-wria. • •• 41111\. AM\ AM\ Ohses....mipi.v1...r.okopuT.invig....17rmiammormaggio7.=.__a 8-- leui, -.II , I • • I • -Atli I • Aat-,-UN irAlefts* VePtrliZ57""" e i...4 L Elw ril a ryi. ip ti:/2 FM 61 ___Alk,alk go jinklallb. a x x x x P fea Ts2 Qr.me 1.114.145,r.I..00,,GO co.K.Kemol.IN.(rye) ffr......os raver,TOftr-tie.kr.. 11 M 6.7.40.PWW,....%.re.IlliiiViiittt WM - 0 I Plutcel.oefrnr ne ereIclineck gi.e174101r AY" X X co.c!..ra.1....e.wectPoo.,.........V. GiA r•• I 11 AN,- ,c.„.. 0. rwl.,...Aron.•ror v",or pezneALL. COPCT.;moo.,CYG-rareell•1 137._•ff -7P-I FA r/1!; lir'AtI 1 1 I to ILL!ac our.,'logo-,t•or,Orl or rm.rZI Ilb. I rii).g.1..W .I Ilos-0:a . Gil ittk11., Alviii opv . tero 11,E, WV, x04041i I ..• il:k1, EN 0, a] EMI iNxi,t, 111111 0 VT Din.,et^ ge Solftults Tree Planting A.,• l'•.1. x< ce • ....jhi ill g tfiNgli 4 ItICI IP I 7„, 71:: 77:1111:17iffte: La I1i••OPI .• ;.....-.. . CM ,t1t! 1*•Ia1; x x IMI EN Ili 1ph ITO 1 4131 311/En IP x x i i i. ''41 klillHIC 2' cOOTAINMO.) iff•CRIII.1.•AS eoecirteo. R 133 NV 011 0 CM fk- --Aiklia Harervo.ome 6.1-r-or,.....1 greeasea. Ali, ______ Vet'poli e•HWEArr.o,IPC 4.MIN.COL, AlAk iti k 1 k '411 I't,.:':/4.0 Shub Planting i1 r NTS I tt 1iv 0 !%Ith.: sa okm e WI* • - VI 110° 111"ei '01 %, Vir 0 i oraxmaira.II4}.1,...,•-•• EA * Eli Mrilign 61 4011h4rk_Alik E311101*43,,%411X pi .2 1 1 1 ' i i enutm xxxxiii laws itx7x.M4,447.Magg irejANiwAg' quiranne,•..N.A g i NIIP"-1111110-1110P-1111, VII/1111/--!- -- it1 •i iid911,LI 1 ft,'1 El 0 elLip. et Ei 41k Ail til. LAI 611 IS meirrasma-- -mosinio-ra -ii-tiv*" .-4on-swei- itiniii- -- titf ititairtil". WI.PALLI : l • m 4I .1111 be N 111 a.ig. teollt 'et+ 0411...••• te El ::.,Ss :.4Pill LA it iii: tri Groundcover Planting FM I All ie EG1 NZ EA FM 1 b i... . I NTS AC EU El LEI I tt] NI iin KM Lrf. IA I i n11111 . 114,-. 41 . 41XatiaMITI-....to,4410wow4.'-w---44".4wnoll... *W. roMiklietlirMOIMMIAtiarAIIMMX.1114)1ori. PO 1,1111m11 ye*IllOPi:. s...10.11:1<.<,...IL - 11)i p„,.....,lik. Mgr NAteolIC. r k*,, Eis Et . In ifT1-12 L'Ll I ft" CM I Plant Spacing Detail i 0 NTS i Ai. An\ i ewe ..e.9 ....- . Note:Refer to Sheet L-a for planting Wee 8 plant schedule I I 1 I I !)i.....'••',......." 11111 III.' l'ir TO 10 0 TO So Flil5al MIDRichard Carothers Associates SCALE 1*:20' M•••••••••• tsloge OAR Ifffft•MIN ffY CPRO DAIL 1.180N BY GOND fr-,,,,,. xxx___L.ANDSCAELELANALDET.AIL.S_ TCO,C.,EaTNIC AUSTINCOMPANY 7/21/89. . GSA L-5 COorsuLTAper• Awc...TECTs 7.,,, „,,„,S.W.16th STREET,RENTON,WA.drox.... CoNeSTIIRC,0,0 U ILK ON MEET r m w I agiallifir`'' --- na twine' mate. W• © rwPilielliP a O V V1 1Iw t rr1_ .-• \. s 0 wm<I<.I.,w a-lo•nt. m wellwNxand nPbn l] AP br rll t l• cal. BAB wll bend. J.W;:.1:.'. — ItLl11 L ni.. f• r IPtil 1-Llil ril l V1 o I w M w 5 Japan.maple If•},!!!mama l A/< I. i• pp11 1 _ "./ A i B AR Pet ebrW car. B® nil branched ra:I -- F. ...•', 1f reli w1NI.fi.'a , .--. --.• Red smile agNit- 1 mama... r•...::..-;...V V Ir strong? ] cal. B•B well branchedr•. win`:r::•:•71 itii•1 /•a• N'1 MA Per.mP. 11 F.9 r{,n,• .w Aw.•• „n•r:;•:,::•.:•:•:":r'.nn••r 1.*.iny .wR M.o•• A Lrew Red Roleid• Ir BelutA PPrrv.Red 9•nf. B]9 multi-stem 11 ram '••1 r•I r'' Ar I I Ni• •.\I lancer blroA Bn9 • tiiEr= 1; ® i•- \ xB CO Cedrue P.P./ e'-10'ht.well Pend. ICE FS7 0 O It tY s mar O i i>v 0 m rZa z. a , r a loneMrtoxinm ® er ': bad hu r2i Gv m ® ® OM a- o [° eiawc"o lsawn/ BnB well branched` L 0 r 61 u• Ls uwt uerrwlnny z,ln•a-Ca. B]B S t1I !k '1 t2l j l is- • rI sB Ps P.mn.,..mat.'R.,many z-pz• ,B well branch. 4ivoo r i jk I I 25 PT Pam m w.e9e<i Ptm B•ao• FP well!winched m m m m Nor ,o m m co o iim 1 MI M71 ii01 afay 9P wer<pinPa,tnerl,/PBSB well branched AAI' m011 @ Ell® K2 K2mtillo, L m itreL m I zn AE Azalea w/ Irae• newer con shaped EM R98 AGf cr•/ 15,18• conatmr full shapedEi= — I . ` ,„,,, LS A:1<Rc. mall L. "'a.:ec: M_ '•..„., iw .i ANE O 10I m I:-1 rcff m M M,l.•x.nn•.uay Is•-le• container cull shapedmm-- II ATV( . r— lY]naatrilt" irlee 7Cs'C I m 1W a:11 P.• Rcal[an..- w i r . i i10 IN CA -. I iLN7 F. m AT Az.,.„am.my n•-zr container en shaped 0 i O f< itII%—F,....11 0 11113,211 m 1 1zs BG mroera l,d+rn.-.N 08.nny s 9a. container con Pap.W. m 67 m r u. I p la P M B.aI ! I.. O ` 0 S3 OU &ra L:Nllaae/ gal. container full,heedm ® ® snnNes or en. II o m1 S a_ p fo nt rer.en e,.b.re rPna,n<rITJnBnlnsT f Ix rr/Mi m p;._ 0 r1' •: e.r..=,:lm/ 59+,. s• m Wnw t can i137 E, b m 'h,,,41 m Im a f Rp<N,prrw memn<r ibnp:nwea V;`:\q^'\"Y. O O c.i. i _ I.. zf ewe C.nana vulgar.•wreaml.• z Bin. conteiner container full,naiad i ^::Nc m O ' %O' r i/ ® r1 71—"!.!:iy••::• r 9 vF Par,Xufpree Fa.<•/ s 9,,. con shaped ii AliAi'. lr .•''_`}' m fit----J/ dmmr. I..,e— v a.:v,l Ili<;,::i=t••r. '' oe0 PL Prumi enguns,;I,e;n,ne•/ 5 9+1. c.nt•m<r full shaped 1 — n IIrVLifl9`• ., mama . e. - •• :•e. m RO container Pee PF i1 'mot'.7. ^ d si0GWn6F madx d.on•B+PAno,a.•/ a--zr' container con, 1 = II• :'i•• P Rhododendron•Xpttroum•/ 18,21. full shaped ILit - © la t t i:y•,rl eL RP Med N[n container than.t• ©ndron'API zr-zr neap con m gotnGIFy• : O 1ILL •••: s R9 RAmexexeren'w,9ur/ zL zf• rued shaped illirMiPn....:IL RI © CM "_- •• w.z6 M Sa hmkerlane hm,lIs/ 2ge1• eonaln<r col,in.. j o it A;, F7 i I i Fill zz 10 sN Via.<., x connp9a1. newer rush,coped n r' — CO m LI 71O „ 1.;•:, U—I •• -L r w,ener, wioneastvr 1 eat- eenafner contelner IB•c.c. e.I EC mama'wrin9weod Mlle'/ ]9a1. 21•oga M o i , © 'illl.l l GP Gauttt'n`Np'ePunmb<m/ 19a1. container 1 ssFF' 4.•1 n @ I c=a/ m eli[.•- ''I —M xed.r[n9hiiin IVY 1 9.1. container IB•o.c.I , ! 0 ''• I If r i>D d 11ii!fi, ' <-PTH P r,.ndre eeroma l,/ 19a1. container le•9.c. v.. YB YI 0a<, container m.19 fib O 0 im I.N m ea:ieulmwe z gal. N•P vy IN v, m I nn I 0 •I • 101111b.m x<note,s mane B.sovoyI` General Notes 41164 Pb ': I1 Al) ree c] RO0.SHLLL 0E RESPONSIBLE FOR FMil1ANIxIxE XIMCLF WITH ALL OTHER SITE li: I Fa •[ a AA] _ C0r4 :4 PRIOR 10 I O N G WITH IAanS[ANE YORE. i M+^• • 2 • a mama dad. I!I 1 1.J.31 m War `;'7 /x. COORDINATE NOM WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS ON-SITE. N I m (] • VERIFY UTILITY LOCAl10M P0.100.i0[r,IFNCIXG UP LANDSCAPE WORR. i-•-.. - ••--'—• —i-_ ISA ® 0•1r: MCTOII SWLL OE RESPoMIOLE F00. rs TINE SPECIFIC pVrltt OF GRO'"E'Ur[[IIIxEtilia.a...,....,.........., I" I — _?A OI-CEMFA r0.t.l sPllIN4 AM MIXIwA6 AN SPEfli1N[N PLAM SOIEOUIE. j•, L 5. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED•GRP/MOVERS WU BE PUMP IN M UNILATERAL TRIANGULARJI!I,CL•=lil.; •,./iiR.1'—Y SPACING PATTERN AT THE OH-CANTER(0.C.1 SPACING SHOWN IN PLANT S[NFWLE. EREDRWHOCEYSHABUTSmCURBINGYAIAI'AYs,MVgEM.SIPS MO BUILDING,ETC.•PrNIr1NEDISTANCEOCENTEREDBETWELVEBETWEENINCHES. EXCEPTION. PROVIDE esNPER OF 1 POW OFGRWHO[OYFA CANTERED BCIWEM NAB MID PPFNPST PM OF SHRUBS WHERE moot ON POI.EN i>© • MN U 1 0 m PUNTING DISTANCE FROM PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREES,AM INCIPWS WILMS SHAD B EIOEM L$ FEZ RI PT PO La m oat INDIES. NO EROUWCOVER MEL BE MAIM WITHIN NU CONIFER TREE GRIPLME. 1 q s 41:1 tFMIZZTERIAIPLANTING AREAS TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE • ll 1 Sr',r; 1 1. THE CPRM[roR SHAH OE RESPONSIBLE FOR DISPOSING Of ALL DEBRIS AND RUBBISH OCCASIONED BY THIS PMJECT.I [ 1)I I••': lAP 8. PLANT MTERIAL OWWTIIIES SHALL BE OETEMINE0 BY SYMBOL LOCATIONS.FIGURES GIVEN MENote:Paler to Sheet L-5LY1forplantingdetails ESIIMTFS ONLY. 0 O 9. OISCPEPAMIFS BETWEEN PIAM PAD SITE CP01110M SNNL BE BROWn 10 THEAIIEMIW Or THEIPPFAPRIORNPROCEEOINE.T I I 10. FOR TRH,SNUB AND..,OVER PLANTING PROCEOURES,REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. • 1 1u I I V` 11 or it•`,.. ° to ,D o to .0 /4\ nMaRichardC•rotlr Merck. at:Ft SCALE idnad PAR I.r•uf Y Cow, PAT[ Awml T ROMP t,• m• I AND P PAN&DET II S no.R TFIO AUSTIN a 1 COSIPANY yin T/zv08 CAMP G.S.A.L-4 a'"F' mow;r„y am lima. ,OCAISN S.W.16th STREET,RENTON,WA•.. RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: 4-18-89 COMMENTS DUE: 5-3-89 ECF 030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build a five story (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in t Office Park Zone. (Note: Applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; sta has advised that this number of spaces is in excess of Code requirements, a that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number o spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the project with the excess number of spaces retained for the present. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . SITE AREA 8 .8 acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 199 , 000 s. f. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2 . Air 3 . Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12 . Recreation 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation 14 . Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-030-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-030-89 PROPONENT: The Austin Company PROJECT TITLE: GSA/FAA Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to build a five story (199, 000 square foot) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in the Office Park Zone. (Note: applicant seeks to provide 853 parking spaces; staff has advised that this number of spaces is in excess of Code requirements, and that it is likely that a recommendation will be made for a reduced number of spaces -- applicant has elected to proceed with evaluation of the project with the excess number of spaces retained for the present. ) LOCATION: 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. (at Raymond Street) . TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON May 3, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE REV. 6/88 o zo o as go i'' d:&20 SCALE:,•=4o.-0• THE AUST I N I WEST va coR.HOLMES ISECTION1923-5 I w I SEATTLECOMPANYIICONC. NUN. ELECTRIC I Q I LUMBER I I I I HALIDE I W I ——— I I— AREA LIGHTI NC Z I NEW ACCESS U CI 18"SS-- s DRIVE ASPHALT /= 18"SS-18"SS— —mooPAVEMENT T— T- BEGIN NEW SIDEWALK 1027.81_' -N 89° 3_5' 25" E SW 1-6T H STREET NEW STREET OLYMPIC NEW CURB LIGHTING(TYP)OI 12"CI-W NEW 6' SIDEWALK— GUTTER I (SITILE26' SIDEWALK EASEMENT EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT PIPELINE GA GAS--- - OLYMPI __GAS- - 12"CI-W GAg_ S_ 12"CI-W— — — LYMPIC PI PELINE— X--XISTUGET PONE PIP INE --O DROP OFF LANE Q EXIST, FIRE HYDRANT EXIST SIDEWALK 2 30' PUGET POWER EASEMENT LANDSCAPING _ 32'S4 L 5.0' -N 01° 22' 58" E 412.89' EXI ST. POWER POLE EXIST. CONC. CURB 0 10' UNDERGROUND- -10' LANDSCAPING EASEMENT o 1( \ 90 \ I/I I . 4,T— _{— _ LANDSCAPING e \ IEXIST. 6' CONC.1 H— I PyI''W WA4' I H I_ I ELECTRICAL EASEMENT 18 C M AQT 26 C)IA ACT • SIDEWALK I a I 110 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I III /Iw10' UNDERGROUND E IIEaa x x x x x :ASPHALT PAVEIEM ELECTRICAL EASEMENT I IIIzryVVx n 18Ch AT 1 :* !13.PA1T 1cn I I2II- dk 1 U18CMPAT c o o Is,IGI y --N j PUGET POWER - ,' Q . HANDICAP Q o1 ,o _)1( J SUBSTATION o X I RAMP P.RKINGp r 19 G 'ACT - -., 8 STALLS ..TwofBUILDINGu• oQ ° I a x w FOUNTAI NHE ENTRANCE _- _ O I , iOZzlIrLGHTBOLLARDS : Q— O I TYP)rvuvl_ 8 1COURTYARD 71-EXISTING I I x covI25' DRAINAGE I—SCREEN BUS STOP- GROUP < EASEMENT x x x x x- WALL I ctHEALTH ol— LANDSCAPING X 240.17' -N_8_9° 35' 25" E _ • c 1II O,i=-- ,I H.U u1 II I x x x x I OFFICE BUILDING d A I -II FIN. FLR. EL. 21.75 3z CJ A.r x a 1 II d I BOE I NG EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT I a LANDSCAPING z T a • ATE'1/ COMPUTER 0.o — mX-e°cTi°h'rySECN[\ ISERVICES 10'.UNDERGROUND I I _ 1 I I_ 24 S AIIDARD1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I22I S}AI1D/1RDI z x cn5 I • I'' III I -}EXIST. FIRE HYDRANTECTGLEASMEETtJ -I"'IpI x LANDSCAPI NC-x X og spyI u I I I IIII I I 24I S I I I I I I I I l I I l I I I22I S}AI{Dl RDI = 5 - 1© 196.0' o III II II__II - ASPHALT PAVEMENT tillII I.x R'' l:.i:'•'•+r; LOADING `PLANE I fJE{40d' I I 1 I I I I III I I I I I I25 cbM A4T n I I I , III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I41I c4AbT r'".f°,,:,:>;, I I I I I I1 I I I I I I_ SI L x LANDSCAPING-X 1 I NEW ACCESS NEW ACCESS I I x DRIVE I— ._I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I24 SMDAROU I I I I I I I I I I I I I 38I S'AliDARC L, \7fC I I I I I I I I1$TI I I I -II II I I CONC. SLABI I DRIVE n I ASPHALT PAVEMENT_ Nr 31 JDAR 38 S DARC S1SIA DF RC I_— 962.90' -N 89° 49' 01"WT y O © — I EXIST. 10' LANDSCAPING STRIP r I d IEXISTING24' EXIST. 10"WM EXISTING 24' I I I IACCESSDRIVE1 - t DU J ACCESS DRIVE VALLEY OFFICE PARK SITE PARKING I I ACCESS DRIVE I I I EXIST INC 2a' TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED=853(BASED ON 170.600 NET SO.FT.)I TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED=853 I I I i I NOTE: FULL SIZE(607J =503 HANDICAP=8OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR I I I R-Aq°.COMPACT (407J =342 ISW16THSTREETSHALLBEIIIr J{ ..•++y4'f'.CONSTRUCTED UNDER FUTURE SECURED DEDICATED SPACES"OFF CAL S (/9':^ 24 19 SW 16TH STREET L.I.D. USE"VECHICLES SPACES=50 SPACES T ,,ii',7•VISTOR PARKING=50 SPACES 14.'A '25 30 TOTAL DEDICATED SPACES=100 SPACES T-'•'`. TOTAL EMPLOYEE PARKING=753 NOTES DATE REVISION TT CARD DATE REVISION or `N° r11 THE A JSTIN OGLE ,"=40-0'• TITLE S I T E PLAN o.„°. 89-5477alCADD COMPANY DATE 03-30-89 OTNER G.S.A.SHEET C-2 07-- 09- 89 A ISSUE FOR BIDG PERMIT RAK PRA CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS OHNOAKR 06 -89 ISSUE FOR BIDS AND PURCHASING RAK PRA ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS M uTE06-30-89 EaTION 1601 LI ND AVE SW, RENTON, WA. ISSUE e I 3 I 4 • . I 3 I o oi,TOP of,PARAPET EL,17TI•Y I' III II_ 11 11 II II _ M. .F-1 irii. I IB5TN.FLaoR _ s I 4714.FLGDR r'Ido 1 I 1MMIIMIItD,LAoR i r II ii 1_, II fi _ iIIIII C 2N17 FlQ7R ISOI Tt-- T J,GRCOND PLR. — I • IL.IOO o' r_J..___, 1i u_T ice___,ems__ IIL_____ O BUILDING SECTION) SCALE Y .I'-o. OM •DATE REVISION ST "R OATS REVISI STON Q THE AUSTIN TITLE BUILDING SECTIONS w.o."o. 89-5417 COMPANY ..n ow".•A-I5 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS O" ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS OATS LOCATION HR. 2 3 4 5 T li) 4 5 G 7 09 A J I TaP aF PARAPlT FL.177.8'" w wow AHOY: --wow NrwI_w w w w w w w w w ll w i w w` II B5TN,FLOOR 11, tL.IGI'•G'- T` 1 1- -i 1 2 / i I I I i r - r _ i -— I — i I I - 11 LL_ ll ll 11 I N. 1 44T 47Lc6R 1 I 1 1 I I I i I I I I I I I I I I . i.r_- I a El Id. Id e 3RD.FLn7R_ EL.I55L(. F i i I i 1 I i I I I I I I I I - I I I Z I - ll II II 1. u II I I C ELN R" r I 1 I r I r i z -r t Dirlf tr II I l I I i i II I4 _or DFLQO I i D O BUILDING SECTION SCALE lie.I'•a i NOTES CAT. REVISION T CM= DATE REVISION T CHI AC) THE AUSTIN ;""TITLE BUILDING SECTION NO. 89.5477 COMPANY DATE OWNER aT A- CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS C1R° ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS DATE LOCATION 1°O. MEASUREMENT 2"0 POPE 1/2"0 PIPE SETTELMENT PLATE NOTES: ON, 2"B PIPE 40 20 0 40 80 I. INSTALL MARKERS IN FIRM GROUND OR ON SAND PADS IF NEEDED FOR STABILITY. SET PLATE, NOT FASTENED) TAKE INITIAL READING ON TOP OF ROO AND AT ADJACENT GROUND LEVEL PRIOR COUPLING,WELDED TO PLATE TO PLACE/ENT OF ANY FILL.FILL.SETTLEMENT PLATE SCAL E:1•=+0'-0' THE AUST I N I HOLMES 2. FOR EASE IN NAMING,ROD AND CASING ARE USUALLY INSTALLED IN 5-FOOT 16"X 16"X 1/4"WEST 1/4 CDR. SECTIONS.AS FILL PROGRESSES.COUPLINGS ARE USED TO INSTALL ADDITIONAL SECTION 19-23-5 LENGTHS.CONTINUITY IS MAINTAINED BY READING THE TOP OF THE LEASURELENT I W I SAND PAD IF NECESSARY SEATT LE COMPANY I I CONC. MaN. ELECTRIC ROD,THEN IMkDIATELY ADDING THE NEW SECTION AND READING THE TOP OF THE I Q I EXISTING GROUND LUMBERADDEDROO.BOTH READINGS ARE RECORDED. 3. RECORD THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF THE MEASURE/ENT ROD EL IN EACH MARKER AT I III SURFACE THE RENTIAENDED TILE INTERVALS.EACH TIME,NOTE THE ELEVATION OF THE QADJACENTFILLSURFACE. II811 I 4. READ THE MARKER TO TIE NEAREST 0.01 FOOT,OR 0.005 FOOT IF POSSIBLE.NOTE W J HE FILL ELEVATION TO THE N ARES 0.1 FOOT. I w \\\ SETTLEMENT PLATE D iA I L` 1J Z \ SCALE: NONE J (n.00)I SW 1 6T H STREET 7027.81' -N 89° 35'25"/ E \ 7' IY:0-00•2 20.58 22.06)22.9) I 8) 20.05) ( .03) o 10' E SEMENT to N .y pp/II_ 202.87' --240.17'N 89° 35' 25" E o 0 32.54'5 30' PUCE POWER rI0. 5.0' -N Oi° 22' : 412. B` CONC. CURB E. EMEND EASEMENTS 1 Neon7- 6' CONC. SIDEWALK I I A17.407 16.87 I 30'X 150'%8" W STRIPING LIMITS x N N M x x z _ QUARRY SPACES illn Y 7- TTEMPORARY SWALE(TYP) `'o I I I 1'0 .._ I PUGET POWER 'K II TOE o SLOPE 1 o c w Ov AN Y SUBSTATION x I SLOPE 2:1 MAX. - IB•?3f < IE•7al AT ETTLEMEM PLATE I.00)018.66 o x O E DETAIL) l p z I T- Z 11 - \ 6)12• CONC. A All) I i9 1 (n CULVERT0tof/)112•CMP OUT NV. ( .ON I I W GROUP a -, 76) x x x N x I I a HEALTH w co R 1" SS' 9j N z yyyyyy I- (19) V ey SLOPE 0.50% A U18.68) 9.26) (19) o MIN. (TYP)17.931 BOE I NGll 19 I COMPUTERI10' EA EMENT 6) AA6 1 I OPCOFRFELAREA 10TYP I .JO SERVICES EL. RW. ' ! INV. 10' EASEIENT I O ( 24.$ T 7 o SILT CONTROL FE J 06Y/ J q C ALL SIDES OF EXIS I 8.36)8.97) CATCH BASIN 20 FT SO 95'-0" ) TYPICAL 2 PLACES) I TOE OF SLOPE SLOPE 2:1 MAX. I SIB 60) 30'X 150'X 8" 4" TO 6" (-) 4 250'-0" L`(18)- I QUARRY SPALLS 1 8) I' I K . 2__ 1 17.9y);1 1I1AV17.64) 17.70)19 97) 11 17.20) 17.80) 17.70) (17701 962.90' -N 89° 49' 1 W 17.60) 17.60) 17.701 17. 0) VALLEY OFFICE PARK EROSION CONTROL NOTES: C 4% POSTS TAKES MAX.FILTER FABRICIr C-55. IN ANY AREA WHICH WAS BEEN STRIPPED Of VEGETATION ANDSAN WORORAETALSTAKES1. ALL LIMITS OF CLEARING AND AREAS OF VEGETATION PRESERVATION 3. THE EROSION AND SEDILEMAiION CONTROL SYSTEM DEPICTED ON NO FURTHER WORK IS ANTICIPATED FOR A PERIOD OF 30 DAYS ORASLDEANDIOBSONTHEPLANNGSHALLBECLEARLYFLAGGEDINTHETHISDRAWINGAREINTENDEDTOBEYINILEM TION PRLENTS TO LEFT LORE,ALL DISTURBED AREAS LUST BE IIL.EDIATELY STABILIZEDDITCHFLOWFIELDANDOBSERVEDDURINGCONSTRUCTION. ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS.AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND WITH MULCHING,GRASS PLANTING OR OTHER APPROVED EROSIONWIREMESHFENCEILINEANTICIPATEEiEOORSEASONALCONDITIONSDICTATE,THE PERMITTED SHALL CONTROL TREATIENT APPLICABLE TO THE TILE OF YEAR IN QUESTION.2'-0' I Z. ALL REQUIRED SEDILEMAT ION/EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES MUST BE ANTICIPATE TINT LORE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES1.-I POST IN OPERATION PRIOR TO LAND CLEARING AND/OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION WILL BE NECESSARY TO INSURE COMPLETE SILTATION CONTROL ON THE GRASS SEEDING ALONE WILL BE ACCEPTABLE ONLY DURING THE MRRHS AFLOWTYP) 4"(-) ROCK TO INSURE THAT SEDI LENT EROSION WATER DOES NOT ENTER SDIES NATURAL BE THEPROPOSED SITE.DURING THE COURSERESPONSIBILITYOF CONSTRUCTION.IT SHALL OF APRIL THROUGH SIT EMBER INCLUSIVE.SEEDING PAY PROCEED.DITCH FLOW LINE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.ALL AND SEDIMENT FACILITIES SHALL BE BE THE OBLIGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY a THE PERMITTEE TO ALIT MUST WHENEVER IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF THE PREMIiREE,DIRECTION N I SILT FENCEBM MIST BE AUGMENTED WITH MULCHING,NETTING,OR OTHERMAINTAINEDINASATISFACTORYCONDITIONUNTILSUCHTILETINTADDRESSAMNEWCONDITIONSTHATMAYBECREATEDBYHIS Q II L.-TOP OF DITCH I I CLEARING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND POTENTIAL FOR ON-SITE EROSION HAS PASSED.THE IlALE1EMATION,MAINTENANCE. ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FACILITIES.OVER AND ABOVE MINIMUM REOUI REPENTS,AS MAY BE NEEDED TO PROTECT TREATMENT APPROVED BY THE CITY OF REMON,ONSIDE THE I SPECIFIED TILT PERIOD. REPLACELEM,AND ADDITIONS TO EROSION/SEDI LENTAT ION CONTROL ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND WATER QUALITY OF 1HE RECEIVING 6. FOR ALL EROSI ON/SEOI LEMAT ION CONTROL PQVDS xHERE TXE DEADSYSTEMSSMALLBETHERESPONSIBILITYOFTHEPERNITTEE. DRAINAGE SYSTEM. STORAGE DEPTH EXCEEDS A',A FENCE.A MINIM OF 3 FEET HIGH 4. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS FOR EROSION/SEDILENTATION CONTROL IS REQUIRED,WITH 3:1 SIDE SLOPES. 24 19 SECTION TYP. SILT FENCE PLAN ONLY. IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL Of STORM DRAINAGE 7. A TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.30'X 50'E N'OF 4-TO 6-DESIGN,SIZE NOR LOCATION OF PIPES,RESTRICTORS,CHANNELS, 25 30 SCALE:NONE SCALE:NONE INCH QUARRY SPALLS SMALL BE LOCATED AT ALL POINTS OF VEHICULARC-5(, OR RETENTION FACILITIES.INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. NOTES DATE REVISION BY CKKD DATE REVISION BY CNKD SCALE I•=40-0• TITLE SITE PREP. & EROSION CONTROL PLAN ..0.BD. 89-5477 a THE AUSTIN FA, CADD COMPANY DATE 03-30-89 OWNER G.S.AG.S.A. SHEET C-5 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS CHID RAN ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS PATE XX-XX-89 pump. SW 16TH STREET. RENTON. WA. ISSUE 40 20 0 40 80 a_N SCALE:1•.413'-r THE AUST I N WEST 1/a GDR• I W.SECTION 19-235 HOLMES ELECTRIC - I a I SEATTLE LUMBER I COMPANY I I CO' ADM. I I I W L N SW 16TH STREET 1027.81' -N89. 35' 25" E _ PROPOSED 6' SIDEWALK tf 10' EASEMENT 4; i©1©i1 -i- .-p r .r' C-y... 240.17' N 89° 35' 25" E :\. © n .'- r r i J:i., 1 11 f J. iligy A .. . i.._.•EXIST. CONC. CUPS 4 t lir, -- _ i.10' EASEMENTS 1 p?rp r / EXIST. 6' CONC. DEODAR CEDAR ' a SIDEWALK 1, - A KWANZAN CHERRY RED MAPLE A ' 4 .r O 7' TO 8' H 4-!' 2" CAL 2" CAL A4 y 4+/ ROCKSPRAY RHODODENDRON ! a 'AV '4 x x x x x _,Q4 RHODODENDRON COTONEASTER 15"TO 18" Qjjj j fa/ Cs,u',Diy7 4°,°. 15"TO 18" 4r 4 O - I) TYPICAL) 611 p°! I PROPOSED 1 RHODODENDRON w Nall qol r j 6' SDEWALK 15" TO 18"I° e 0,02) KWANZAN JAPANESE GROUND 1161 O1 4 ''I O o CHERRY O, 11 ,j 0i I/Ol 2„ CAL SNOWDROP COVER JAPANESE PIN OAK jj,(3',. N ° 1 j ,0,1 B z I o © 6' H SNOWDROP 0 2" CAL ,PUGET POWERAVM e' H pa'm .., C-4C-4 O It FLOWERING 7. CHERRY fig' 1 " o I "o '.. a; N SUBSTATION x ha COVERVi I camel ','vw lnavl wwrto: 6EMpnI NG ' tor ormO'_x I l aa +iN GROUND l,2 'S of 0 x Z = : /l PIN OAK WILDLIFE x x DEODAR CEDAR QII z„jEal CRWND a (/)ENHANCE :Nf O' 8'TD 10' I COVER / 4. j y/+ 2„ CAL LANDSCAPING x a ' I p, W4a:N 1Q[ PLANTER 4 4 >4 x x x x x LANDSCAPE I0 RHODODENDRON 4 1'pv FL• UAW Q' SHRUBS AND 15"TO 18"HEAGR TH 1 FLOWERING I w 411f1i 4 01OCHERRYGROUNDCOVER4 4 DEODAR CED R Over. 24 .17' -N 89° 35' 25" E _ I m p DEODAR CEDAR a:c,..-.1 Z I 4 `04 7' TO 8' 7 0 l/a0 1 1/2"CAL Q u 7' TO 8' H j 4 4 QI OFFICE BUILDING IC 0, 4 BOE I NGFIN. FLR. EL. 21.50 JAPANESE 0:.4-' COMPUTERCa ='`? :`—" HOLLY i SERVICESi.41 P RHODODENDRON Q 18"TO 24" 1r4 ` 15" TO 18" frrnIMAPLE EAE8€NfIQ LAWN(TYP) I, die P 1(9 CI ( TYP) jII _ oAir—o)] 1 I1'flr lgrMRalrl!t7111 ai rroirs seir Or O":I © X 4 ,40 GROUND O K1GROUNDKWANZANCHERRYPINOAK '/4 X4CP; KWANZAN CHERRYCOVER I.. X II KWANZAN CHERRY C 2„ CAL COVER_ 2" CAL 2" CAL 1./.0 x '•.4'1 2" CAL l) ii40 ) RHODODENDRON IgD 1da4 X 4 MO RHODODENDRON 5) RHODODENDRON I at4 = 15"TO 18" 15"TO 18" k, r_-t 4!1 RHODODENDRON I I A -RED MAPLE RHODODENDRON DEODAR CEDAR 15" TO 18" ° 1 4 2" CAL 15"TO 18" 7' TO 8' H I 3 GUYS 120°APART VALLEY OFFICE PARK TURNBUCKLE EXIST. 10' LANDSCAPING STRIP 1 STAKESX 24 1 54 T 'l'' -- 4 2 3A-0 1 1rL 4 2% '1 11 1-6" SITE LANDSCAPING X) 1tir TOPSOIL AND .,--->:`'16" MIN. 2' VARIES 3' 1'- PEAT BACKFI LL r `-••- I••' TOTAL SITE AREA=383,330.00 SQ FT 12'-0" 6'-0" 1' 12'-0" ARIES 1 sTOTALREQ'D LANDSCAPING=76,665.60 SQ FT TWICE BALLI ACTUAL LANDSCAPING AREA=78,104.60 SQ FT DIAACTER PERIMETER LANDSCAPING AREA=55,621.35 SO FT 24 19 TYPICAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL SECT I ON n INTERIOR LANDSCAPING AREA=20,949.95 SO FT SECTION 2%WILDLIFE ENHANCEMENT AREA=1533.30 SO FT r A- 25 30 SCALE: NONE SCALE: NONE C-2 C-2 SCALE: NONE C74 C-4 IOTES DATE REVISION BY POO DATE REVISION Br CHAD g1THE AUSTIN uEE 1'=40-0" TITLE gy CADD LANDSCAP I NG PLAN 0.N0. 89-5477 COMPANY DATE 03-13-89 dNER G.S.A.SHEET C-4 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS DNxD RAK ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS mre xx-XX-89 IDaTION SW 16TH STREET, RENT ON, WA. ,.NE Po-°:14:1 .m.9°I=1 40 20 0 40 80 N. mi r6mammoi GI SCALE:I•=40'-0• THE AUST I N I WEST 1/4 CDR. I LU I COMPANY ISECTION19-23-5 CONC. MON. IHOLMESELECTRIC a I SEATTLE LUMBERII Lu I)L- J V)LL.I n 7) \ ({yp) 20.5: 2z06) 22.9) 17.00)1 SW 1 6 H R T 1027.81' -N 89° 35' 25" E _ r- YD 16.87) ( 16.69) 17..7) 59) 240.1%N 89° 35' 25'•pAillikk 20.05) ( 4.03)16.98) o c 10' SEMEN!' G' S-i DI 32.5E_. 5.0' -N 01° 22''y 30' POWER 1---- gB \\MICONC. CURB 4i 10' EASEMENTS I _ - F 19.5/ 1 I -- 19.0 19.0 T•O 6' CONC. SIDEWALK 19.0 T/C 19.75 ILW' 14 -•I' W T/F 18.25 `' Y T/F 8.0' 1 J•// 7T/F 18.25 i I 1 F 18.0 J.. r j .\WI iz zl V © 19.50______,--O 10 _ niPUGETPOWER1 9.0 SUBSTATION R LL.Ito I 19.50 19.50 8.2Ef 1:,7:) /'1 N. 1 T BUI'FQ 1950 00)z l/a\2, 19.50 19.50', `" ENfRA OT/F 18.0 Zi1 I_1!- __ _ _i 6 __ __ 12" CONC. x 41 i9 A 19.50 N ao CULVERT IN g n I i 1 12" MP OUT INV. 14.0' o s 11IN. 14.0' I /'i `\ j Q EAO T H 78 T/F 18.0 j 19.50 19.50 `- T/F 18.0 z 1 18.68) 01 26) 199 -- 19.0 19.0 :.-. _..__ ' __-_ 8 •• 17.9'YOFFICEBILDING1925 BOE I NG I`''., TWr 18.0 T/F 18 19.25, o FIN. FLR. EL 21.50 I COMPUTE R10' Fa.EMENr SERVICES B 1a /17, lrrv. lzao I 10' EASE PI , 19.50 19.50 19.50 s ! • T/F 18.0 ,, I 1 / II1119.54 1. i 19.50 A. i° °j 1 r 19.50 19.50 19.50 19.50 T ' O 1I 18.36)9A`\ 19.50 19.50 18'50 I, 60) (11 •7) I 1 8 11 .16.1, -=/-'/ 18.50 _____ T/ 18.0 r 0 'T/F 18.0 I T/F`18.0 T/F 18.0 I T/F 18.0 I T/F 18.0 1 T/ 18.0 i '' T/ 18.0 I I ni 1:.75 18.50 I 18.15 18.75 18.50 18.75 18.5- 18.75 18.50 10.75- 18.50 I W/17.64) t17.70 79 97) 17.9)- 1 j.,II 17.20) 17.80) 17.70 (179) 962.90' -N 89° 49' 01" W 17.61) 17.60) 17.7.) 17.80 18.41) EROSION CONTROL NOTES: VALLEY OFFICE PARK EXIST. 10' LANDSCAPING STRIP PROVIDE 15" HIGH CONC. CURB TOP OF PAVEMENT EL. (18.5) 1 ALL LIMITS OF CLEARING AND AREAS OF VEGETATION PRESERVATION 3. THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL SYSTEM DEPICTED ON 5. IN ANY AREA WHICH RAS BEEN STRIPPED OF VEGETATION AND WHERE TOP OF CURB EL. (19.0)I AS PRESCRIBED ON THE PLAN SMALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE THIS EARNING ARE INTENDED TO BE MINIWM REOUI RELENTS TO MEET NO FURTHER WORK IS ANTICIPATED FOR A PERIOD OF 30 DAYS OR FIELD AND OBSERVED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS.AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND LORE,ALL DISTURBED AREAS MIST BE ILSEDIATELY STABILIZED UNE%PCETED OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE.THE PERUITTEE SHALL WITH MULCHING,GRASS PLANTING DR OTHER APPROVED EROSION 2. ALL REQUIRED SEDILENTATION/EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES VbT BE ANTICIPATE THAT MORE EROSION AND SEDIAENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES CONTROL TREATAENT APPLICABLE TO THE TIME OF YEAR IN QUESTION. IN OPERATION PRIOR TO LAND CLEARING AND/OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION WILL BE NECESSARY TO INSURE COLELETE SILTATION CONTROL ON THE GRASS SEEDING ALONE WILL BE ACCEPTABLE ONLY DURING THE MONTHS i0 INSURE THAT SEDI LENT LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE NATURAL PROPOSED SITE.DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION,IT SHALL OF APRIL THROUGH SEPTEI9ER INCLUSIVE.SEEDING WY PROCEED, DRAINAGE SYSTEM.ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT FACILITIES SHALL BE BE THE OBLIGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERUITTEE TO 10101/ER,WHENEVER IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF THE PREMITTEE. MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CONDITION UNTIL SUCH TlAO TWATADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY HIS BUT LEST BE ALOLENTED WITH BELCHING.NETTING.OR OTHER CLEARING AND/CR CONSTRUCTION IS COLY'LETED ANT POTENTIAL FOR ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FACILITIES.OVER AND TREATMENT APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RENTON.OUTSIDE THE ON-SITE EROSION HAS PASSED.THE IMPLEMENTATION.MAINTENANCMAINTENANCE.IENANCE. ABOVE MINIMUM OR LOCAAENTS, AS MAY GO NEEDED TO PROTECT SPECIFIED TILE PERIOD.j REPLACELENT,AND ADDITIONS TO ERDSIOWSEDI LENTATION CONTROL ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND WATER DUALITY OF THE RECEIVING 6. FOR ALL EROSION/SEDIMENTATIONMENTAiION CONTROL PONDS WHERE THE DEADSYSTEMSSHELLBETHERESPONSIBILITYOFTHEPERMIiTEEDRAINAGESYSTEM.STORAGE DEPTH EXCEEDS 6".A FENCE,A MINIMA!OF 3 FEET HIGH 4. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS FOR EROSION/SEDILENTAT ION CONTROL IS REQUIRED.WITH 3:1 SIDE SLOPES. 24 19 ONLY.IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF STORM DRAINAGE7, A TEMPOARRY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.JQ'%50'%8"OF A-TO 6-DESIGN,SIZE FAR LOCAE ION OF PIPES,RESTRI CtORS,CWANNELS,INCH QUARRY SPALLS SHALL BE LOCATED AT ALL POINTS OF VEHICULAR2S30ORRETENTIONFACILITIES. INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. MOTES DATE REVISION BY CARD DATE REVISION BF cKKp GRADI NG PLAN flTHE AUSTIN " COOT- 0" TITLE W.D. m. 89-5477 COMPANY DATE 03-30-89 °W ER G.s.A.SWEET C-3 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS CNND RAK ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS DATE OO OO-89 6DCLTION SW 1 6T H STREET, RENTON A WA• ISSLF e°o54771 1001 V•04-0489 4 ____ 4 01 I I 1' • 1-'0 (6) (F) C-.) JO C) '01 • ® Ci) Ci) ' 0 Cr) 1 l_.To.F', s, 1_ III F-i-v-.- I 4 i-1 • I I410MART'. "" Atil Ful- Ff., , 0 i -:-- s _AI. Hi II Pl- rfsr I, 7 1 0I Is1I1..,v 1..lo rw.•Pr, ., I-1 I I I . 11! . LVTIQ kJ . 1--1 C.7 17---T H ..... ..1__ ___V__A-.. bc...e...1.. * if iv . I. - cr,,, a.- * 1 ," . l'.. O 010 © © i0 CD • 0 0 . 0 10 0 0 0 - e . ci), . • c 1 ,Hr, 1 aw I -r•,.P. I . I t.. 1111 11111111111 1 A 111111111=111, 111111 2i-IMIIINEI 111111 1 ,ttr-uv-•.1'.arr. I o I WM11. 111111111111111iimiiimiiiiiiI4 ,..., •i PP 1.14-.1ff, , 11Ir • s, i 1 - I rniDrn11111flm1flfl11 1,0P_Ft4r-••ft2.kiw,f_s_• t moms= 3C 1=1M-7,„. Era 11 111111111111avey.Fix-ArsA) . aip..9r14.PI'MI 7.--. 111•111 l,\1 __I___•_. L. V As T_ 1 c) kl_________ . . 1 ......c)__!..J__T _ ..._,.._,. v,6,T 1 c) 1.-.1 _ I/Ito" --, l' - C," vc./..i...e. .: -1/1/,' r. 1' - I 1 • 0=.1 DAR VISION OT COON DATA AMMON AT C1003 43 THE AUSTIN .....Ire TIT= El FVATIONS W.O.NO. 01.641-1 COMPANYDA li Air CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS =RD monENGINEERSCONSTRUCTORSDATALOCATION I 7 .__ 2DD .1.00.0. 2...00 ,BB i 16 SCALE:,°=zoo'—o• i' r! / I HOLIDAY INN GW 0Y WF/''- I LI CITY OF RENTON 1 STORM WATER DRAINAGE NOTES I. BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY OCCURS,A ION MEETING W57 BE HELD I WITH THE CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT R PUBLIC WORKS, J! DESIGN ENGINEER. TO BELLEV UE 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 1988 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD.BRIDGE AND BOX CULVERTS MUNICIPAL CONSRULIION"PREPARED BY W UBL.O.T.,AND J THE CIPAL CN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCATION(APAR),AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF REMON DEPARMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. LIMITED AGGRESS FREEWAY INTERSTATE Y 405 3. THE STORK DRAM MACE SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING 70 THE APPRWED PLANS WHICH ARE ON FILE I IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.ARE DEVIATIONS FROTI TO I-S r 7THE APPROVED PLANS WILL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM 3 __ 3: THE CITY OFENGINEEROR STRMNWATERRUTILITR PUBLIC WORKS,DESIGN I N Y. THE IN I. I 4. A COPY Of THESE APPROVED PLANS MIST BE ON THE JOB SITE i' j AUST I N SEATT LE I I WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. Q I M COMPANY HOLMES Q LUMBER 5. DATUM SHALL BE U.S.G.S.UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BYLONGACRESIIIELECTRICCITYOFRENTONDEPARTMENTOFPUBLICWORKS.REFERENCEII'INDUSTRIAL I I I I I I (\ JPARKII I I II BENCHMARK AND ELEVATION ARE NOTED ON THE PLANS. I_ J -- JJ\ __ __ IN L-' -_J L___ i 6. ALL REA NCLEACLEARINGING/ANDS ION FACILITIESIBG MAT BE,ANDINOPERATION 1 L` MUSTRBE SiCOMPLETED RA OORILP MAINTAINED UNTI-STTENSTRUCONSTRUCTION Y SW 16TH ST __ NoLEANDPOTENTIALR 1 ___ HAS PASSED I I PSUBSTATOWI OEN 7. ALL RETENTIOWDETEMION FACILITIES MUST BE INSTALLED AND 1 II 7 / IN OPERATION PRIORiD OR IN COW UCiION WITH ALL CONSTRUCTION LJ I/ ACTIVITY UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT 11J1 I I I rI I OF PUBLIC WORKS.STORM WATER UTILITY. B. GRASS SEED IVAY BE APPLIED BY HYDROSEEDING.THE GRASS SEED PROPOS BETA-WEST BETA-WEST MIXTURE.OTHER THAN CITY OF RENTON APPROVED STANDARD MIXES.OFFICE I LOT 1 LOT 4 AI SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND APPROVED BY BUILDING I THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.STORM WATER UTILITY. 9. ALL PIPE AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE LAID ON A PROPERLYPREPAREDFOUNDATIONINACCORDANCEWITHSECTION0-02.3(U GROUP HEALTH I OF THE CURRENT STATE OF WASHINGTON STANDARD SPECIFICATION CO-OPERATIVE FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION.THIS SHALL INCLUDE NECESSARY I \ I LEVELING OF THE TRENCH BOTTOM OR THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION MATERIAL AS WELL AS PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF REQUIRED3IIBEDDINGMATERIALTOUNIFORMGRADESOTHATTHEENTIRE I LENGTH OF THE PIPE WILL BE SUPPORTED ON A UNFORMILY DENSE 0 UNYIELDING BASE.ALL PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE APRA CLASS'C'.j WITH THE EXCEPTION OF P.V.C.PIPE.ALL TRENCH BACKFILL Q BE COMPACTED TO MINIMUM 95%FOR PAVEMENT AND STRUCTURAL O O \ Ip I I FILL AND 90%OTHERWISE PER ASTI 0-1557-70.PEA GRAVEL EMBEDDING SHALL BE 6"OVER AND UNDER P.V.0 PIPE. O 0 N N. \\3 I I 10.GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE AND ALUMINIZED STEEL PIPE FOR ALLN yQ DRAINAGE FACILITIES SHALL HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT Al ORIFK I BETTER INSIDE AND ONSIDE. I I 11.STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE rn LOT Z LOT SPRING LINE OF ANY STROM DRAINAGE PIPE.OR 15 FEET FROM THE TOP OF ANY CHANNEL BANK.I W K. 12.ALL CATCH BASIN GRATES SQUALL BE DEPRESSED 0.10 FEET BELOWIIIQDPAVEM!M LEVEL. LONGACRES 1 I I I of I aZI 13.OPEN CUT ROAD CROSSINGS THRV EXISTING PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAYA\ VALLEY OFFICE PARK x WILL NOT BE ALLOMD UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPRWED BY THE A \ NW CITY OF REMON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.DESIGN ENGINEER.J— D I4.ROCK FOR EROSION PROTECTION OF ROADSIDE DITCHES,MERE REQUIRED, A W 1 TH ST SHALL BE OF SOUND QUARRY ROCK PLACED TO A DEPTH OF I F001 ANDI MIST MEET THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS 4"-8"/ROZ-7DR PASSING; A 2"-4"/30%.-40%PASSING,AND-2"ROCK/10S 20R PASSING. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 15.ALL BUILDING DOWNSPOUTS AND FOOTING DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED1TOTHESTORMDRAINAGESYSTEM,UNLESS APPROVED BY THEIPARCEL"A" DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS,DESIGN ENGINEER R STORM WATER I UTITIIY.AN ACCURATELY DIMENSIONED CERTIFIED AS BUILT1iQ1LOTS2AND3OFVALLEYOFFICEANDINDUSTRIALPARK-SUBDIVISION No.1, DRAWING R THIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THEACCORDINGTOTHESHORTPLATRECORDEDUNDERKINGCOUNTYCITYOFRENTONUPONCOMPLETION.RECORDING No.8002269013;I I CITY I W I EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON 16 ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT BY THE OF J FCR STREET PURPRES BY DEEDS RECRDED UNDER RECORDING CITY OF RENTON DOES NOT RELIEVE THE OWNER OF THE CONTINUING 11 RENTON I Q I No's.80070704464.6008200077 AND 8202160354; LEGAL OBLIGATION AND/OR LIABILITY CONNECTED WITH STORM SURFACE WATER DISPOSITION.FURTHER,THE CITY OF RENTONIONING I> I SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. DOES NOT ACCEPT ANY OBLIGATIONFOR THE PROPER COFUNSTRUCTION.AND MAINTENANCE Of THE SYSTEM PROVIDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. j/ V1 17.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATEI i I W I PARCEL"B" : SAFEGUARD,SAFTEY DEVICES,PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT.FLAGGERS, AND.ANY OTHER NEEDED ACTIONS TO PROTECT THE LIFE HEALTH. j // I ACCORDING TOROETCORDIOF NCVNo` THE 8002269013• TEYOFFICEANDIRECOROEDLUNDERKINGPARK-SUBDIVISION No.1, WNYITHWITHINTRTHEMTRAVELEDRICM-0E-WAY T THE THAT MAY INTERRUPTNTRACT. SAFTEY OF THE PUBLIC,AND TO PROTECT PROPERTY IN ON I NORMAL TRAFFIC FLOW SHALL REOUIRE AN APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL Y EXCEPT THE EAST 240.06 FEET THEREOF; PLAN BY THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT I OF PUBLIC WORKS.ALL SECTIONS OF W.S.D.O T.STANDARD 1) 1 i 1 r--- I AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF REMON SPECIFICATIONS 1-01-23,TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL APPLY. I I I I I ,-1I I FORSIITUATEEET PURPOSES BY DEED IN THE CITY OF REMONECOCRQUDIERDYUOF NDER KING STAREGOF WASHINGTON. 18 LOCATION ISPECIALTSINAGEMEASURES WITHIN THE AOUITFER PROTECTIONILLBEREQUIREOIFTAREA?HE PROTECT GATE REVISION BY OM DATE REVISION BY MD SCALE ,"=ZOO-0" TITLE VICINITY MAP w.D.ND. 89-5477ES a THE AUSTIN AR CADS COMPANY DATE 03-03-89 CATER G.S.A.SHEET C-1 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS CHID RAK ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS DATE XX-XX-89 IDGYIDN SW 16TH STREET. RENTON, WA. 169ME KIN WORK PLOY A O3-16.89 40 20 0 40 80 Nci, SCAL E:I•=4o'-9• THE AUST I N I CONC. MDN. WEST 1/4 COR. SECTION 19-23-5 HOLMES ELECTRIC a SEATTLE LUMBERCOMPANYII 3 I I I W L--- Z PROPOSED I24'VE I TACCESSDRIVE- / 18"SS -- _ 18"SS- 18"SS-- 0„.. N SW 16TH STREET 1027.81` -N 89° 35' 25T E _ LiO EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT PIPELINE 12"CI-W 6ROSIDEWALK-GAS- --12"CI-W- -PLPMPINE_GAS PI PELINE 1 EXIST. PUGET POWER Mli 10' EASEMENT R.C`/'L LIB 202.87' -7 240.1 N 89° 35' 25"- 1 1 -- EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT EXIST çIDEwALKCONC. CURB y°> 3D' PUGET POWER EASEMENT -LANOSCAPILANDSCAPING 2.54 L-ici_`-- i - 412.89' UNDRAPING-- N.-EX ST-POWER POLE5.0' -N O1° 22' S8" E SIDSEWA 6' CONC. fti tt-1- tl- fiH D' EASEAENTS t l JI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \`°\EEEnJ X X N x x / I II( 1 I x x - I I Cr) I I" - U - I. x PUGET POWER x a i = O O HANDICAP Q IN. 2 - SUBSTATION I Ijwx ,o 1el I InrWglBUILDING1. IQcNxx Q z i ENTRANCE-- --- mO z II - x x IE. xN F — N 0 m 1 I-' zam f WoaxxII" aN GROUP a ,r x x x x x i m SIDEWALK- _ HEALTH I1 __ 240 17' -N_8_9° 35' 25" E _- I^ —,1 — Z V' d I k xx m WAIN LEVEL FIN. F RL L. NGD m I v' LANGZAAPI NC J I a, J I I I I I I I I I I13 IRIG TDRI I - - I III ID' EASEMENY/I (COMPUTER WATER AFTER I 6 1 I I I SERV I CES 3" COMPOUND I o SS I/ 'F% WATER ACT x F I I J I10' EASEIIENT WI 4" B'(P SS __ t I I r LANDSCAPING I- 3"W ' I Q a J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I { -'-:" x I I r_ - 6'F PROPOSED v, 6" FIRE HYDRANT I 6"X 1" DOUBLE DETECTOR I 6' SI DEWAL CHpE K VIAI L E SEA03-Y LOAD! I I 105'- 101IIJII- I I I I I I I I l I I FII R S IEIIT U ER r0 N I N t 11 I I I 1 1 I I E016T REILEDSTANDARD AGGOESSEDRZYE I 1-1 II I III11IIII IIII IIII IPROP ED'4' I y ACCE DRIVE JI II I If I RQPOSED 10' I I I I I I TA EFIEPTN I o1 of I- 962.90' -N 6' 49' 01"W NoT.-EXIST. 10"WM STUB c AT PROPERTY LINE EXIST. 10' LANDSCAPING STRIP ACCESSNDG 24' RI VE I- 1}00 EXIST. 10"WM EXISTING 24'I I ACCESS DRIVEI VALLEY OFFICE PARK I I1 NSITEPARKINGIIACCESSNDR?YE TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED=853 P TOTAL PARKING REO'D=758 FULL SIZE=497 24 19 HAND(GIP P. 8 SECURED=8 25 30 COMPACT=340 NOTES DATE REVISION 6Y CKKD DATE REVISION 8Y LN1m N.O.NO. 89-5477 ZaTHE AUSTIN SCALE CADD 0' TITLE SITE PLAN COMPANY DATE 03-30-89 MNER G.S.A. SWEET C-2 CONSULTANTS ARCHITECTS am RAK ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTORS DATE %%-X%-89 orwTloN'SW 16TH STREET, RENTON, WA. ,... ff lion fiC CITY OF RENTON 4` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division June 9, 1989 Robert G. Snyder The Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 Re: GSA/FAA Office Building 1601 Lind Avenue SW ECF; SA-030-89 Dear Mr. Snyder: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on June 7, 1989 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1.That the applicant provide a revised site plan, including 770 parking spaces (with 83 parking spaces identified as being held in reserve and developed with landscapingand/or recreational amenities, subject to the approval of the Planning Division andTrafficEngineeringDivision. Note: After it has been established that an operable Traffic Management Plan has been in effect for at least one year, the Zoning Administrator shall carry out anevaluationofon-site parking at the applicant's request. If the Zoning Administrator determines that there is an apparent need for additional on-site employees parking,he may release any or all of the parking held in reserve. 2.That the applicant provide a revised on-site exterior lighting plan, including a combination of planned 30 foot high exterior lighting fixture and pedestrian-scaled lighting fixtures sufficient to illuminate the office structure, parking area,landscaped areas, recreation areas, and site periphery, subject to the approval of thePlanningDivision. 200 Mill Avcnlic South -"Renton. Washington 9R055 - (70()7nc-occn Robert G. Snyder GSA/FAA Office Building June 9, 1989 Page 2 3.That the applicant be required to provide a plan for traffic management, subject to the approval,of the Traffic Engineering Division, including, but not limited to: a.Assessment for Burlington Industrial Park Benefit Zone. $560,465.00 Transportation Benefit Zone Assessment Fee. 2,845 trips generated at197.00. b.Building required to have a commuter information center. Also preferential parking space is to be assigned to multi-occupant vehicles and van pool uses. c.Developer to work with Metro to provide a TSM plan which includes: 1) information about, organization of, and preferential treatment for vanpools and carpools; 2) information about and incentives for use of public transit systems; 3) a bus shelter on the west side of Lind Ave. SW nearest to site. This plan is to be approved by the City's Planning Division and Traffic Engineering Division. d.Driveway width to be 30'. e.Existing street light in proposed driveway off Lind Ave. SW to be relocated by a City approved lighting contractor not just removed as shown on plan. f.Provide for street lighting on SW 16th St. Plans to be coordinated with CityproposedstreetimprovementsonSW16thSt. Submit drawings for approval. g.SW 16th St. - Lind Ave. SW to Raymond Ave. SW overhead power distribution conductors below 55KV to be undergrounded and placed under or behind the sidewalk. The developer will need to provide for and make those arrangements with Puget Sound Power & Light Company. h.Lind Ave. SW - a right turn deceleration lane needs to be provided fordrivewayapproach. Submittal of design plans required. i.Provide for channelization of a center lane two way left turn at the drivewayentranceoffLindAve. SW. Channelization plans to be submitted. j.SW 16th St. - Provide vehicle turn-out in front of building for drop-off of passengers on SW 16th St. Show plan on drawing. k.A joint driveway access, if feasible, with the adjoining property to the southofthesite (Lind Avenue South). 1.Signage at the drop-and-ride center indicating a five minute maximum limitforparkingonthatcorridor. m. Marking of the fire lane with striping or signage to prevent vehicle parkingalongthatcorridor. Robert G. Snyder GSA/FAA Office Builuing June 9, 1989 Page 3 4.That the applicant install sidewalks, curbs and gutters, lighting and landscaping alongS.W. 16th Street from the western property boundary to Lind Avenue South including the property which traverses the Puget Power Substation) and from the corner at S.W. 16th Street south along Lind Avenue to the southern boundary line.The proponent may prefer to participate in a L.I.D, which would serve to providefinancialbenefitatsomefuturepointfortheinstallationofthoseandrelatedimprovements.) 5.That the applicant provide: a) on-site bicycle parking facilities; and b) a five foot wide bicycle lane (including gutters) on S.W. 16th Street, in order to facilitate recreational and commuting cyclists. 6.That the applicant be required to provide the following, at the time of siteplan/building plan review: a.Specifications for a plan for storm drainage management which includes: a) adetentionsystemwhichwillmeetthefollowingtwoscenarios: i) if conveyance capacity of the existing City storm system is determined to be sufficient in capacity to address a 25 year storm, then the requirement will be ten year detention with a ten year existing conditions release rate, or ii) if the capacity of the existing system is determined to be less than that necessary to address a 25 year storm, the requirements would be for a 25 yeardetentionsystemwithareleaseratebeingcomputedunderpredeveloped conditions for the year storm matching the capacity of the existing systemi.e. if the capacity of the existing system is 2 years, then the release rate willbecomputedonthe2yearstorm); and b) a water quality protection systemwithbaffledoil/water separators and biofiltration prior to the off-site release of any storm drainage. This plan, which has been authorized in principle,should be subject to approval for specific components by the Public WorksDepartment. b.l. A flood control management system which includes a plan for: a) siting ofthestructureatanelevationwhichwouldensureprotectionofthatstructureandanemergencyvehicleparkingareaduringa100yearflood - (NOTE: thesubjectsiteisnotintheexisting100yearfloodplain); and b) a landscapingsystemwhichisdesignedtoenhanceerosion/flood control management (e.g.berms, plantings which cover and protect soil, etc.). This plan should be subject to approval by the City's Storm Water Utility Engineering Division. AND b.2. A document which acknowledges that the City has informed the applicant that the subject property is located in an area which may be included in analtered100yearfloodplain (assuming the P-I Channel is not developed), and that the applicants have decided to proceed, at their own volition, thereby waiving their rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/orforanydamagetopropertyorpersonarisingfromsuchflooding. This agreement should be subject to approval by the City Attorney. AND 4 I e. Robert G. Snyder GSA/FAA'Office Building June 9, 1989 Page 4 b.3. A containment program for ensuring that materials now (or in the future) stored on site are not allowed to contaminate the underlying terrain in the event of flooding, in order to protect wetland areas in the vicinity of the site. This plan should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department. Note: The site is not currently in the 100 year flood plain, but that plain may change from current FEMA levels depending on drainage alternatives now being considered by the City, such as the P-1 channel project). Note: See 5/4/89 Memo and 6/7/89 Memo from Storm Water Utility Engineering for specifications. 7.That the applicant be required to provide a plan for construction, including: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel-washing of construction vehicles prior to their leaving the site to control dust and debris; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site to control dust and debris; d) a plan for hauling routes and hauling hours to mitigate traffic impacts; and e) a bond of $3,000.00 for street clean-up. These plans should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Police Department, and the Planning Division. Note: At the time of site plan review, the site plan, landscaping plan, recreation plan, and other, related plans, all of which were submitted on June 5, 1989, which have been approved in principle must be approved in detail by City representatives. Similarly theparkingplanwillneedtobeapproved. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day commentperiodduringwhichcommentsaresolicitedfromvariousagencies, jurisdictions orindividualswhomayhaveaninterestintheCommittee's decision. The comment period willendJune27, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it'sDeterminationunlesscommentsreceivedrequireareevaluation. Following the finalizationoftheDetermination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235- 2550 and ask for Lenora Blauman or me. For the Environmental Review Committee, eer ly, 1 Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp ill 11 a-.-s_ --_ 15AGh__IDAQU1 owl__ i IE 9'37 1 .4- i Cla.alk. IV' ). i0 N I 201*_33 ' -5'3 ' 12 3' I (PO' 4- 3 V = 93' 1 d1 7 ' C To LLLID kv ) wE5r d zo i -1- 3 3' = 3 760' (Io Ptx,ti7 i1 ii 11 11 j II ii 1, 1iII i*±.._.I.II C_ s- 1 WM PA __ . 1 1; 11 E IIii f1 t if ii ii 1! 1 II E4 --'- --._._.._._ f 11 ij II Ej fj ii 1j 11ii II II I II it1i 11 Ij I- lI Optical Systems Lighting Layout Assistance Specifications All reflectors pass IES "cutoff" criteria. Lithonia Architectural Outdoor lighting on a project, regardless of daytime appear- Outdoor reflectors are made from reflector-grade aluminum ance, is not satisfactory if it does not accomplish the basic alloys,anodized, brightened and sealed.Each reflector is spe- goal:a pleasing nighttime effect combined with efficiency and KQS Series KQR Series cific to the distribution. No compromises such as different security for people and property. socket settings or add-on shields are tolerated.111 Type I1,1i ,„n iiiimn I• 7; Cutoff(R3 BMW 1 //i11 ‘ iii %//// II;tiilli t, K J»ii»i. .<<i Jiiiiiia.._...-.- 1:,-. 1l,- kun 11 allitkalft- 2 i. k..... ___,_w...A 901)) rr a\aG\aca v. ,, 44110,,1.1, 11 11/1) II IITheasymmetricTypeIIIdistributionisextremelyversatileSelectingthebestluminaire/reflector/lamp combination, at in application. Faceted specular elements combine with the correct mounting height, can be a complex task. Lithonia parabolic contours to achieve high performance uniform- Architectural Outdoor provides the lighting designer with sev- ity around the perimeters of a site. eral levels of support: a Detailed photometric information published on the back of every fixture specification sheet. Template binder which includes all Lithonia Architectural Outdoor luminaires. Distribution patterns are printed on Type V Square vellum, at several mounting heights, in five commonly-Cutoff(R5S) used scales. Dimensions—24" square housing, 9-1/2" housing depth, Dimensions—26" diameter, 12-1/4" housing depth, Layout recommendations from your local Lithonia repre • • 27-1/2"total depth 32-1/2"total depth (including arms) sentative who can calculate point-by-point measurements. Housing—Rugged,heavy-gauge,lightweight aluminum hous- Housing—Heavy-gauge spun aluminum in centriform shape. U Application Engineering assistance from the factory for ing in symmetric square shape. Continuously seam welded Permanent mold cast aluminum lens frame with impact- for weathertight integrity.Permanent mold cast aluminum door resistant flat tempered glass lens. (1000W Metal Halide and precisely plotted footcandle levels on your blueprints.g g ' p frame with impact-resistant tempered glass lens. Butyl rubber Mercury Vapor are convex tempered glass). Butyl rubber gas- 4,.......0 SPEC-L,S ecial Pro rams for En ineerin Calculations for1pggg gasket and EPT closed cell foam gasket inhibit entrance of ket and EPT closed cell foam gasket inhibit entrance of outside Lighting, is a comprehensive yet user friendly PC based outside contaminants.Brushed aluminum legs thread into the contaminants. Brushed aluminum legs thread into the door software package developed by Lithonia Lighting.The pro- door frame.Recessed,combination-head 1-3/4 turn fasteners. frame. Recessed, combination-head 1-3/4 turn fasteners. Po- 1' 1 rams have been extremelywell-received bylighting deggg Positive-locking device holds housing open during servicing. sitive-locking device holds housing open during servicing. signers around the country, garnering high marks for ease Optics—One-piece hydroformed, multi-faceted anodized Optics—One-piece hydroformed, multi-faceted anodizedofoperationandprogramdesign.Reviewed in the IES mag aluminum reflectors. Two IES cutoff distributions available: aluminum reflectors. Two IES cutoff distributions available: azine"Lighting Design + Application"in October 1988,the Type III (Asymmetric)and Type V (Square). Reflectors hinge Type III (Asymmetric) and Type V (Square). Reflectors hinge evaluator said "It does all the things one would want from out for servicing and are field interchangeable. out for servicing and are field interchangeable.The symmetric Type V Square distribution is the ideal a lighting design piece ... without any reservation, SPEC-L choice for illuminating the center portion of a parking lot is the easiest lighting program that I have run."Ballast/Electrical System—Constant wattage autotrans- Ballast/Electrical System—Constant wattage autotrans- or other open area. A square distribution can result in Contact your Lithonia Lighting representative for more details former, 100% copper wound and factory tested. All electrical former, 100% copper wound and factory tested. All electrical fewer poles and luminaires on a project because light or to request any of these tools. components are unitized on power module for ease of instal- components are unitized on power module for ease of instal- overlap is eliminated.lation and maintenance. Positive-locking quick disconnect lation and maintenance. Positive-locking quick disconnect plugs on primary and secondary.Mogul base porcelain socket. plugs on primary and secondary.Mogul base porcelain socket. Mounting—Slipfitter pole-top mounting for 2-3/8" O.D. x 5" Mounting—Slipfitter pole-top mounting for 2-3/8" O.D. x 5" high tenon. Mounting hardware is cartoned separately. high tenon.Mounting hardware is cartoned separately. 1 Finish—Dark bronze TGIC polyester powder electrostatically Finish—Dark bronze TGIC polyester powder electrostatically applied and oven cured is standard. Nine other architectural applied and oven cured is standard. Nine other colors and colors available as options. Architectural Class 1 dark bronze anodize are available also. Listing—U.L. 1572 listed suitable for wet locations. Listing—U.L. 1572 listed suitable for wet locations. ir Options—House Side Shield (R3 only), Quartz Restrike Options—House Side Shield (R3), Quartz Restrike System, III III System,Lamp Support,Single Fuse,Double Fuse,Photoelec- Lamp Support, Single Fuse, Double Fuse, Photoelectric Cell. tric Cell. KQR ORDERING INFORMATION Catalog Number&Distribution IDWattsR3(Type 111) R5S(Type V Square) Voltage High Pressure Sodium 250 KQR 250S R3 KQR 250S R5S 400 KQR 400S R3 KQR 400S R5S 1000 KQR 1000S R3 KQR 1000S R5S Metal Halide 120 250 KQR 250M R3 KQR 250M R5S 208 400 KQR 400M R3 KQR 400M R5S 240 1000 KQR 1000M R3 KQR 1000M R5S 277 480 Mercury Vapor TB 250 KQR 250H R3 KQR 250H R5S 400 KQR 400H R3 KQR 400H R5S 1000 KQR 1000H R3 KQR 1000H R5S EPA: 1.9ft2 KQS ORDERING INFORMATION i Ill 11I `' R. Catalog Number&Distribution Watts R3(Type III) R5S(Type V Square) Voltage High Pressure Sodium 250 KQS 250S R3 KQS 250S R5S 400 KQS 400S R3 KQS 400S R5S 1000 KQS 1000S R5S 120 Metal Halide 208 250 KQS 250M R3 240 400 KQS 400M R3 KQS 400M R5S 277 1000 KQS 1000M R5S 480 Mercury Vapor TB 250 KQS 250H R3 400 KQS 400H R3 KQS 400H R5S 1000 KQS 1000H R5S EPA:2.2ft.z 1111 KQS Series KQR Series Crisply squared corners on the KQS create a clean silhouette The classic round KQR shape is well-suited to new construc- Shipped Installed In Fixture Architectural Colors(painted finish) against the sky when installed.A choice of two optical systems tion or retrofit. Both Type V Square and Type III Asymmetric SF Single Fuse(120,277V) DMB Medium Bronze ensures flexibility to match distribution patterns to site require- distributions are offered. Electrical components are unitizedDFDoubleFuse(208,240,480V) DWH White ments. Reflectors hinge out for servicingand are field inter- on a removablepower module withquick-disconnect plugsPERNEMATwist-Lock Receptacle only(no photocontrol) DBL Black g P 9 QRS Quartz Restrike System DNA Natural Aluminum changeable. Dark bronze TGIC polyester powder finish is on primary and secondary. A positive-locking device retains HS House Side Shield(R3 only) DSS Sand Stone standard, with nine other architectural colors available. the housing in an open position during servicing. Along withLSLampSupportDGCCharcoalGrey Shipped Separately DTG Tennis Green the standard dark bronze TGIC polyester powder finish, Ar DBR Bright Red chitectural Class 1 dark bronze anodize is available as an op-PE1 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(120,208,240V) DSB Steel Blue tion, as well as other painted finishes.PE4 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(480V) PE7 NEMA Twist-Lock PE(277V) Architectural Class 1 Anodize ADB Dark Bronze(KQR only) III III III KQ SERIES CUTOFF AREA LIGHTING te<`• . c.,_ it, 11111111:.„ _imp A y " " t W Sri-4! ,vt i. a sf C 7' it` .at_ k f ; ,< 7 I ) 1o r . If 1 a \a" ern s ' ;, s II x MI c, ILI ilMgllihlln. ' a1 O Square and Centriform Post-Top Luminaires CrTM F JUN 51989 LITHONIA RECEIVED ARCHITECTURALtaOUTDOOR A ARCHITECTURAL OUTDOOR 1989 Lithonia Lighting 1/89 A DIVISION OF LITHONIA LIGHTING Form no.720.117 PO BOX 72.CRAWFORDSVILLE.INDIANA 47933•TELEPHONE 317 362-1837•FAX 317 362-9083 0 Ili ,,14,,,hilliyil,:ks..71,,,,h'",4, ---41,i,,,,k, 4. 4 kti11:-1 ' --.. l' L. I KING SAVER N s ..0101 11100 1A00L.- '. I I L1 IT I I <<jlirrir/j//1/Mjjr,jr 1 l l1 III,I T I I rr Ar /1 11100/: I7I-1 T 1 II_ itF A I f ' r rs!l 0000ago 1i1 1 I I ` i 1 [11I aI f N f I I! 11`4 1111 yIII ,1 `II I f,e....,,.. i+ice I I I I III pillI s,,._ z_• sio11MM y I I I LI I j{ {,ivall1is emiegli 1 Area LightingI ; I, 7.4-,,i_., i;l Exterior lighting undergoes a selection process similar to that I I II, used with every other element of a project: Is it functionally efficient as well as pleasing to the eye? Does it work in the A:-!A//YN0di bilMi .. specific space?Will it endureyears of rigorous use?Can it be z ii 1A11rAAA1 MIIMi 11PPg installed and maintained with a minimum of effort?Is the man- i III I Iufacturerknowntobereputableandwillingtostandbehind the product? Is superior value received? Lithonia Architectural Outdoor declares a resounding"yes"to I I I I I I I I each of these specifier questions, and presents the KQ Series I I I I I I ( +I of post top luminaires as proof. The square KQS and centri- I w I L ' I I I form KQR shapes are appropriate for parking lots, plazas or 184V walkways. The finely detailed housings are mounted on brushed aluminum legs which seem to disappear when viewed from a distance.There is no sense of great mass at the top of each pole; rather the luminaire virtually "floats," allowing the 01A A , A ; other site elements to dominate. 6 iii T 1111111 JI I lii 0 v 4: I: :1. t4ft- .,...,,,-.:,,,,,.4_4:....;- 1 .. w--"...' ...#: , x,4 t. x J 4 Tlip:", 111411111r0::: ."' a -',.....*: i 1 401: 4 , ._ 4'. rs—. j es:• iy r manommlnuy fit- Yir" a'. ' s:' — . y Y`-..- a r9 Y. Y tea. y AU.,c...._IL___ i d t r r a e sty y u'!74 Specifications KBR KBS Specifying the traditional round bollards immediately ensures A choice of 6" or 8" square bollards is offered by Lithonia KBS Series KBR Series the walkway will be a gracious space, well illuminated, at a Architectural Outdoor so that the site lighting is appropriate scale comfortable to pedestrians. Standard bollard height is for whatever size the site. Other looks can be accomplished 42", but three other height options mean great flexibility to by the addition of a smoke or bronze acrylic lens, optional Dimensions—KBS6: 6" square x 42" height Dimensions—KBR6: 6" diameter x 42" height achieve proper scale with sitework. Standard finish on the painted colors, or using the cylindrical reflector in one of four KBS6: 8" square x 42" height KBR6: 8" diameter x 42" height KBR6 and KBR8 is dark bronze TGIC polyester powder; nine finishes.The KBS is available in high pressure sodium, metal other colors and dark bronze Architectural Class 1 anodize are halide, mercury or incandescent sources.Housing—Extruded one-piece aluminum, .188" wall thick- Housing—Extruded one-piece aluminum, .156" wall thick-also available. ness.Top cover is a weldment of.188"wall extrusion and.250" ness.Top cover is a weldment of.156"wall extrusion and.250" top plate. 42"overall height is standard.All external hardware top plate. 42"overall height standard.All external hardware is is stainless steel and tamper-resistant. stainless steel and tamper-resistant. Enclosure—Clear seamless 100% virgin acrylic, 5/16" wall, Enclosure—Clear seamless 100% virgin acrylic, 1/4" wall, flush fitting. flush fitting. Gasketing—Closed-cell EPDM. Gasketing—Closed-cell EPDM. Optics—Hydroformed, fluted anodized aluminum upper re- Optics—Hydroformed, fluted anodized aluminum upper re- flector combined with spun aluminum anodized flared cone flector combined with spun aluminum anodized flared cone is standard. Cylindrical lower reflector available as an option, is standard. Cylindrical lower reflector available as an option, in lieu of flared cone. in lieu of flared cone. Ballast/Electrical System—High power factor ballast, 100% Ballast/Electrical System—High power factor ballast, 100% copper wound and factory tested for reliable operation. Elec- copper wound and factory tested for reliable operation. Elec- trical components are tray-mounted with quick disconnect trical components are tray mounted with quick disconnect plug, and accessible through the bottom of the bollard• plug, and accessible through the bottom of the bollard. Finish—Dark bronze TGIC polyester powder electrostatically Finish—Dark bronze TGIC polyester powder electrostatically applied and oven cured is standard. Nine other architectural applied and oven cured is standard. Nine other colors and colors available as options.Architectural Class 1 anodize are available as options. Anchor Bolts—(4) 1/2"x 11" with double nuts and washers. Anchor Bolts—(4) 1/2"x 11" with double nuts and washers.III4-1/2" bolt circle template included. 4-1/2" bolt circle template included. Listing—U.L. 1572 listed suitable for wet locations. Listing—U.L. 1572 listed suitable for wet locations. Options—Overall Height of 24", 30", or 36", Smoke Acrylic Options—Overall Height of 24", 30", or 36", Polycarbonate Lens, Bronze Acrylic Lens, Festoon Outlet, Cylindrical Reflec- Lens, Festoon Outlet, Cylindrical Reflector, Single or Double tor, Single or Double Fuse, Architectural Colors. Fuse, Architectural Colors. Optical Design Design Features Lithonia Architectural Outdoor developed a unique two-piece is the other half of the system that affects one aspect of bollard The exceptional engineering and structural integrity of Lithonia optical system to bring high performance photometrics to bol- lighting performance. Depending on the shape of the lower Architectural Outdoor bollards ensures their performance over lard lighting. The fluted design of our hydroformed reflector reflector, a "beacon" can either be created or negated. Now many years on a project. Call your Lithonia representative to precisely directs light throw and minimizes arc-tube voltage the specifier can make the choice as to which distinctive night- see examples of the"best value in bollard lighting"for yourself. rise. This upper reflector is the heart of the optical system, time effect will enhance a particular project.11111 IIIproducingover90% of the horizontal illumination. However, it 1 1 71111‘,, :.t. 3 r 1 'i 1/ItiM: oil Easy Installation and Maintenance Tray-mounted with quick disconnect for convenience,the elec- trical components are accessible through the bottom of the bollard. High power factor ballast is standard. A rugged, cast aluminum base is mounted first to the four II anchor bolts.All leveling and alignment(critical to square bol-a lards) is performed on this base. After power supply connec- tions are made, the preassembled bollard is simply placed r. upon the base casting. Four 3/8" SST set screws secure the luminaire in an upright position.All Lithonia Architectural Out-f door bollards take the same anchor bolts and drilling pattern. Lamp AccessibilityIIIIIIsPrrr -' ` Tali o: -: ,' No other bollard offers quicker, more secure access to the ti I ii'° `'' lamp. Simply loosen the single, captive, tamper proof screwIinthecenterofthebollardcapandthecapliftsfree,exposing 11j the lamp for service maintenance. Standard Flared Cone Optical System Optional Cylindrical Reflector System The flared cone is the standard optical system for all Lithonia Now glare free nighttime performance is possible in a bollard. Architectural Outdoor bollards. It captures a reflection off the The cylindrical reflector option, available on all four shapes inside of the lens and bounces it back into the viewing angle. and sizes of Lithonia Architectural Outdoor bollards, is an in- This "sparkle" of light is useful when delineating long walk- novation for after dusk that gives a sleek daytime appearance ii fit ways, marking pedestrian entrances, or creating a perimeter as well. The cylindrical reflector captures the same internal tk rr effect. The flared cone produces a consistently uniform circle reflection as the flared cone,but directs the light below viewing of light around the bollard. angles.This type of maximum cutoff is necessary where cars are driven,where bollards are used near residential or hospital nip. OP t07,-. . 0, . . . windows,or where bollards are used on an incline and the eye u level of people climbing a staircase is below normal. fy.111* 4414 411r1 I v I z 1 T s 1 4, 7-:':I I , if , ., 1 CYA Specular Alzak* CYBL Black Alzak* CYG Gold Alzak* CYFB Flat Black KB SERIES SITE LIGHTING 1, 1 777 1Y 12 i 4 ii. i , . . .,.. i, it,,,, ).!,,,,,_*•., .00, „,•,, ,.., A iI, . 1(, ; It 1111 1. 0:,. i t aa A.,441.,,,,,:...;.04,4,.::,....: 4:.!:=1',- -.... . ,.. . : _ . , l 1 015 .i...,-We ,rr ' {7F e Je E y t ". .L F, R h !a - f f:rib r.•''. It} -• -..L:.:-„.,.i. s74{r sk: iv lzr+ . 4, 4., '"^trap'. F , rc t;_ 1 y t 1,.. ty /1! 1..- 14, I To A. ;Z ., ems. ife. I arm. 1 1 1A. t,JJt 0 0 Square and Round Bollards PLANNING DMSION CT'OFRENTON JUN 51989 L/TON/A RECEIVED fla ARCH/TECTURAL OUTDOOR rAi L/TH^ON/A 1989 Lithonia Lighting 1/89 ARCHITECTURALHHoNTECTURAL OUTDOOR Form no.720.113 PO BOX 72.CRAWFORDSVILLE,INDIANA 47933•TELEPHONE 317 362-1837•FAX 317 362-9083 Lighting With Bollards KBS ORDERING INFORMATION The clean, classic lines of Lithonia Architectural Outdoor v t Catalog Number&Distribution bollards complement virtually any setting or building style. V 47 Optional Cylindrical Reflector Painstakingly designed in visually pleasing proportions, Standard the KB Series bollards gracefully emphasize an entrance or Watts Flared Cone Spec.Alzak Black Alzak Gold Alzak Flat Black Voltage delineate walkways and walls. Ill io High Pressure Sodium 35 KBS6 35S R5 KBS6 35S CA KBS6 35S CB KBS6 35S CO KBS6 35S CF vii. il 50 KBS6 50S R5 BS6 50S CA KBS6 50S CB KBS6 50S CG KBS6 50S CF 50 KBS8 50S R5 KBS8 50S CA KBS8 50S CB BS8 50S CG KBSB 50S CFill71-i=i R 70 KBS6 70S R5 KBS6 70S CA BS6 70S CB KBS6 70S CO KBS6 70S CF Vertical Footcandles 70 KBS8 70S R5 KBS8 7OS CA KBS8 7OS CB KBS8 70S CG KBS8 70S CF l. 100 KBS8 100S R5 KBS8 100S CA KBS8 100S CB KBS8 100S CG KBS8 100S CF 150 KBS8 150S R5 KBS8 150S CA KBS8 150S CB KBS8 150S CG KBS8 150S CF The precision-engineering i Metal Halide optical system used in Lith-oil Ir z° onia Architectural Outdoor 1 00 KBS8 100M R5 KBS8 100M CA KBS8 100M CB KBS8 100M CG KBS8 100M CF 2°8 bollards provides excep- I' Mercury Vapor 240 tional photometric perform- 50 KBS6 50H R5 KBS6 50H CA KBS6 50H CB KBS6 50H co KBS6 50H CFr- ance. Vertical illumination is 75 KBS6 75H R5 KBS6 75H CA KBS6 75H CB KBS6 75H CO KBS6 75H CF p excellent for accenting a fa- 75 KBS8 75H R5 KBS8 75H CA KBS8 75H CB KBS8 100H CB KB 75H Co KBS8 75H CF 100 KBS8 100H R5 KBS8 100H CA KBS8 100H CG KBS8 100H CF cade.Egress areas are made WO Incandescent l safer by lighting vertical i, B KBS6B116WKSS61R5S6ICAS61CB S61 CG KBS61 CF t surfaces such as planters, 1 `) 150 KBS8 I R5 KBS8 I CA KBS8 I CB BS8I CO KBS8 I CF benches, retaining walls, or NOTES: Other people. 120V only on 35,50W and Incandescent401 Beacon Effect KBR ORDERING INFORMATION s x 0 * _ Catalog Number&Distribution Optional Cylindrical ReflectorThesparkleoflightabove5;: d .p the horizontal typifies the Standard bollard as a beacon, an of a watts Flared pec.Alzak Black Alzak Gold Alzak Flat Black Voi g Cone S Voltage fective way to light entry ways j Ntr-1•° A.k y High Pressure Sodium c x s f p3 35 KBR6 35S R5 KBR6 35S CA KBR6 35S CB BR6 35S CG KBR6 35S CF and paths.The fixtures serve a c a 50 KBR6 50S R5 KBR6 50S CA KBR6 50S CB KBR6 50S CO KBR6 50S CF as guideposts, defining pe- iik , a 01 '4 z 50 KBR8 50S R5 BR8 50S CA KBR8 50S CB KBR8 50S CO KBR8 50S CF destrian walkways or area a a ' 70 KBR6 70S R5 KBR6 70S CA KBR6 70S CB KBR6 70S CO KBR6 70S CF y70 KBR8 70S R5 KBR8 70S CA KBR8 70S CB KBR8 70S CO KBR8 70S CF boundaries. 100 KBR8 100S R5 KBR8 loos CA KBR8 100S CB KBR8 loos CO KBR8 loos CF ir- 150 KBR8 150S R5 KBR8 150S CA KBR8 150S CB KBR8 150S CO KBR8 150S CF Metal Halide 70 KBR6 70M R5 KBR6 70M CA KBR6 70M CB BR6 70M CG KBR6 70M CF 120 100 KBR8 100M R5 KBR8 I OOM CA KBR8 100M CB KBR8 100M CG KBR8 100M CF 208 240 Mercury Vapor 50 KBR6 50H R5 KBR6 50H CA KBR6 50H CB KBR6 50H CG KBR6 50H CF 9` 75 KBR6 75H R5 KBR6 75H CA KBR6 75H CB KBR6 75H CO KBR6 75H CF 75 KBR8 75H R5 KBR8 75H CA KBR8 75H CB KBR8 75H CG KBR8 75H CF Horizontal Illumination 100 KBR8 100H R5 KBR8 100H CA KBR8 100H CB KBR8 100H CG KBR8 100H CF Incandescent A symmetrical 360° pool of is g; 116W KBS6 I R5 KBS6 I CA KBS6 I CB KBS6 I CO KBS6 I CF light is radiated around the 150 KBS8 I R5 KBS8 I CA KBS8 I CB KBS8 I CG KBSB I CF 4 _-.tom-" -:base of the bollard by the NOTES: unique fluted reflector. This 120V only on 35,50W and Incandescent broad distribution of light means pavement or land-Shipped Installed In Fixture Architectural Class 1 Anodized y f--. scaping is attractively uni- SF Single Fuse ADB Dark Bronze(8"only) 111444.G form in lighting appearance. DF Double Fuse Accessory(Field Installed) Addingan optional half-H24 Overall Height:24"R6S Half-Shield(6"round)P H30 Overall Height:30" R8S Half-Shield(8"round) h shield limits the light throw to H36 Overall Height 36" RBS Half-Shield(6"square) T. half the lens area. i F2 Festoon Outlet S8S Half-Shield(8"square) 1 F2GF Ground-Fault Festoon Outlet 0 y'` o PC Polycarbonate Lens(Round only) SL Smoke Acrylic Lens(Square only) Afirlt BL Bronze Acrylic Lens(Square only) 1 Architectural Colors(painted finish) I t, -+ 'Mk- DMB Medium Bronze yk..,e x,,DWH White A t1 DBL Black 4 x yy DNA Natural Aluminum DSS Sand Stone DGC Charcoal Grey DTG Tennis Green DBR Bright Red DSB Steel Blue voiliiiiii4400....., A t Ilial" y _ fit j°/ .. u 411;. t4 111111 Ilia r.----- 1 111 fir/ + Nk. ^ 1f n 44 __ I'.. 7 . 41. Apar, r111141. . 7":... 57. 3111,.. 441r- 46 ' 4 11" 1"" PriAlr" 741--- - 41111111EL. _ 20• . V.-.- 8 __-----=_-_-- ..._ LL, , f4