Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSR_WoldeERC_FINALDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Project Location Map SR_WoldeERC_FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC Meeting Date: April 1, 2024 Project File Number: PR22-000260 Project Name: Wolde Critical Area Restoration Land Use File Number: LUA24-000040, ECF, CAE Project Manager: Andrew Van Gordon, Associate Planner Owner: Elias Wolde, 13701 SE May Valley Rd, Renton, WA 98059 Applicant/Contact: Kerrie McArthur, Confluence Environmental Company, 146 N Canal St Suite 111, Seattle, WA 98103 Project Location: 13701 SE May Valley Rd, Renton, WA 98059 (APN 3424059113) Project Summary: The applicant is requesting a Critical Areas Exemption and Environmental Review for removal of an unpermitted retaining wall, stairs, paved patio and associated site improvements for the benefit of site restoration. Per COR Maps development occurred within the 100-year flood hazard area, floodway, sensitive slopes and protected slopes and their associated buffers. Development also occurred within the buffer of May Creek; May Creek is classified as a Type F, fish bearing stream. Proposed restoration is in response to CODE22-000071. Exist. Bldg. Area SF: 4,920 sq. ft. Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): Proposed New Bldg. Area (gross): 0 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Site Area: 22,771 sq. ft. (0.52 acre) Total Building Area GSF: 4,920 sq. ft. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M). DocuSign Envelope ID: ABD8D32C-16ED-4293-9B4E-C0989EDCD6FC City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Wolde Critical Area Restoration Staff Report to the Environmental Review Committee LUA24-000040, ECF, CAE Report of April 1, 2024 Page 2 of 7 SR_WoldeERC_FINAL PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND On March 2, 2022, CODE22-000071 was opened due to a report of a patio along the bank of May Creek (Exhibit 12); May Creek is located on the southern portion of the site A site inspection revealed that an unpermitted patio area had been constructed within critical areas. Unpermitted work with the critical areas includes a retaining wall, stairs, clearing, grading and paving. This work occurred on the southern portion of the property on and below a slope roughly located in the center of the property. A detached dwelling and associated accessory structures/development occur upslope (north) of the project area. Per City of Renton (COR) maps this work occurred within the 100-year flood hazard area, floodway, sensitive and protected slopes. May Creek is classified as a Type F, fish bearing stream and includes habitat conservation areas. Proposed restoration includes removal of the unpermitted improvements, regrading to before the unpermitted work was completed, removal of invasive species, retention of native vegetation and replanting of native vegetation. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day appeal period B. Mitigation Measure 1. The applicant shall provide an Inadvertent Discoveries Plan (IDP) prepared by a qualified professional. The IDP shall be submitted with the civil construction permit application for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to permit issuance. Notice shall be provided to Concerned Tribes to have a tribal monitor on-site if archaeological work or monitoring is performed. C. Exhibits Exhibit 1: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Report Exhibit 2: Site Plan Exhibit 3: Stream Buffer Revised Mitigation Plan, prepared by Confluence Environmental Company, dated August 2023 Exhibit 4: Preliminary Arborist Report, prepared by Tree Solutions Inc. dated July 7, 2022 Exhibit 5: SEPA Environmental Checklist Exhibit 6: Geotechnical Report, prepared by The Concept Group dated January 18, 2023 Exhibit 7: Base Flood Elevation Study, prepared by Aspect Consulting, LLC dated July 28, 2022, revised October 11, 2023 Exhibit 8: Residential Geotechnical Mitigation Report, prepared by The Concept Group dated June 27, 2023 Exhibit 9: Critical Area Study, prepared by Confluence Environmental Company dated August 2023 DocuSign Envelope ID: ABD8D32C-16ED-4293-9B4E-C0989EDCD6FC City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Wolde Critical Area Restoration Staff Report to the Environmental Review Committee LUA24-000040, ECF, CAE Report of April 1, 2024 Page 3 of 7 SR_WoldeERC_FINAL D. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: As shown on the site plan (Exhibit 2), unpermitted development occurred within the 115-foot (115’) critical area stream buffer coming as close as within one-foot (1’) of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of May Creek. Development includes: • Grading. • Placement of gravel. • Placement of flagstone pavers. • Installation of a stairway from the northern, upper portion of the property down to the southern, lower portion. • Installation of two (2) retaining walls: one (1) four-foot (4’) wall at the base of the slope and a three-foot (3’) tall wall adjacent to May Creek on the south side of the unpermitted work. Per the SEPA Environmental Checklist (Exhibit 5) approximately 3,307 square feet of area was graded for the project. One thousand six hundred and fifty-four (1,654) cubic feet of gravel and 1,082 square feet of flagstone pavers were placed. This does not include the work completed for the stairs which included regrading and pavers. Amounts were not included related to work to construct the stairs or the retaining walls. Per the geotechnical report, prepared by The Concept Group, dated January 18, 2023 (Exhibit 6) concurs that development occurred within the defined critical areas. Soil conditions are identified as Everett very gravelly sandy loam. This soil series consists of gravelly sandy glacial outwash overlaying glacial till. The slope extending from the upper area where the dwelling is located down to the unpermitted work is approximately 23 feet (23’) tall with a slope grade of approximately 35 percent (35%) with a portion in the center of the west side of the slope with grades between 40 and 50 percent (40-50%). Site observations found that the existing slope and developed conditions to be stable with no visible morphology of surface or landslide activity and no observed erosion on either bank side of May Creek due to the activity. A Base Flood Elevation Study, prepared by Aspect Consulting, LLC (Aspect) dated July 28, 2022 (revised October 11, 2023) (Exhibit 7) identifies the base flood elevation upstream as 281.9 feet (281.9’) and downstream as 270.0 feet (270.0’). 2016 LiDAR and a recent survey data were used to develop cross sections for the unpermitted development. Based on previous LiDAR observations May Creek is gradually migrating southward. Aspect believes this is a natural process rather than a response to patio construction. Based on the modeling two (2) instances of base flood elevation rise occurred due to the Exhibit 10: Duwamish Tribe comment dated March 4, 2024 Exhibit 11: Staff Response to Duwamish Tribe Exhibit 12: Warning of Violation dated March 8, 2022 Exhibit 13: Advisory Notes DocuSign Envelope ID: ABD8D32C-16ED-4293-9B4E-C0989EDCD6FC City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Wolde Critical Area Restoration Staff Report to the Environmental Review Committee LUA24-000040, ECF, CAE Report of April 1, 2024 Page 4 of 7 SR_WoldeERC_FINAL patio construction; both are on the project property but do not extend off-site. Except for the southern edge of the patio fill, the unpermitted development is outside of the pre-project floodplain. The estimated total volume of encroachment fill in the pre-project floodplain is approximately eight (8) cubic yards. A follow up Residential Geotechnical Mitigation Report from The Concept Group dated June 27, 2023, (Exhibit 8) provided recommendations for removal of the unpermitted work and invasive species. An appropriate erosion control system to collect and filter all surface run off through either silt fencing or a series of properly placed and secured straw bales; a system of berms and drainage ditches around construction areas is expected to provide an adequate collection system. As part of the removal of English Ivy on the slope, it should be removed in stages and replaced with a native deep rooting vine or ground cover to protect the slope. If all of the ivy is removed at once the face of the slope should be protected with a jute matt or other erosion blanket material to allow planting on or through the material. Removal of materials such as the masonry, concrete and backfill will need to occur by hand with the restored surface vegetated with native species of shrubs and plants with surface armoring such as logs, rocks, or other natural materials included. To restore the slope grade, the backfill material used behind the wall should be placed onto the cut and graded to match the existing slope. Backfill material should be keyed into the slope and compacted to a non-yielding condition. Surface vegetation should be restored using native, low maintenance deep rooting species. Grades greater than 30 percent (30%) should be covered with jute matting or other surface erosion blanket which will allow planting through the material. It is anticipated that the City’s Critical Area Regulations and grading regulations would adequately mitigate impacts of the proposed restoration. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. 2. Water a. Wetland, Streams, Lakes Impacts: May Creek, a Type F stream, is located on the southern portion of the property flowing from east to west. Type F are waters that are known to be used by fish or meet the physical criteria to be potentially used by fish and that have a perennial or seasonal flows. A Type F stream has a 115-foot (115’) critical area buffer width with a 15-foot (15’) structure setback beyond the buffer. Per the Critical Area Study, prepared by Confluence Environmental Company, dated August 2023, (Exhibit 9) the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) SalmonScape (2022a) maps the reach of May Creek within and adjacent to the property have documented presence of coastal cutthroat trout, steelhead trout with documented spawning of sockeye salmon and coho salmon. While WDFW does not identify the documented presence of Chinook Salmon, May Creek is listed as gradient accessible to them. Prior to the unpermitted development, the project area included small walls along the western and eastern property boundaries with fencing, a brick fireplace, two (2) black cottonwood trees, sword fern and English ivy on the abutting slope, and various herbaceous vegetation which appears to have been kept in check through mowing and other maintenance. Downstream, the riparian area is forested with a mix of black cottonwood, Douglas fir and western red cedar. The understory is a mixture of native vegetation such as salmonberry, Indian plum and sword fern with some invasive species such as English Ivy and Himalayan blackberry. Upstream, the riparian area is forested with a mix of black cottonwood and western red cedar trees. The understory is sparsely vegetated with a mix of native vegetation such as Indian plum and sword fern and herbaceous vegetation. Unpermitted development occurred within the 115-foot (115’) critical area stream buffer coming as close as within one-foot (1’) of the OHWM of May Creek including grading, fill, installation of pavers, retaining walls and stairway. Per the SEPA Environmental Checklist, approximately 3,307 square feet of area was graded for the project. One thousand six hundred and fifty-four (1,654) DocuSign Envelope ID: ABD8D32C-16ED-4293-9B4E-C0989EDCD6FC City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Wolde Critical Area Restoration Staff Report to the Environmental Review Committee LUA24-000040, ECF, CAE Report of April 1, 2024 Page 5 of 7 SR_WoldeERC_FINAL cubic feet of gravel and 1,082 square feet of flagstone pavers were placed. This does not include the work completed for the stairs which included regrading and pavers. Amounts were not included related to work to construct the stairs or the retaining walls. The Base Flood Elevation Study identifies the base flood elevation upstream as 281.9 feet (281.9’) and downstream as 270.0 feet (270.0’). 2016 LiDAR and recent survey data were used to develop cross sections for the unpermitted development. Based on previous LiDAR observations May Creek is gradually migrating southward. Aspect believes this is a natural process rather than a response to patio construction. Based on the modeling, two (2) instances of base flood elevation rise occurred due to the patio construction; both are on the project property and do no extend off-site. Except for the southern edge of the patio fill, the unpermitted development is outside of the pre-project floodplain. The estimated total volume of encroachment fill in the pre-project floodplain is approximately eight (8) cubic yards. All restoration work would occur within the 115-foot (115’) critical area buffer. Per the Stream Buffer Revised Mitigation Plan, authored by Confluence Environmental Company, dated August 2023 (Exhibit 3), 7,000 square feet of onsite stream buffer would be impacted. Restoration work would include removal of the entire patio, retaining walls, stairs and gravel. The area would be regraded, topsoil will be installed, and native vegetation will be planted. Grading and topsoil installation would occur in the summer and fall with plantings in the fall. All removal work would occur by hand with no machines within the 115-foot (115’) critical area buffer. It is anticipated that the City’s Critical Area Regulations and grading regulations would adequately mitigate impacts of the proposed restoration. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. 3. Vegetation Impacts: Existing vegetation within the critical area buffer include two (2) black cottonwood trees within the patio area, English ivy, sword ferns and one (1) each of a Douglas fir, Western Redcedar and a Bigleaf Maple on the slope. Per the Preliminary Arborist Report, prepared by Tree Solutions Inc, dated July 7, 2022 (Exhibit 4) of these five (5) trees, three (3) are landmark trees: a 42-inch (42”) Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) Douglas fir, a 39.6-inch (39.6”) DBH Black cottonwood, a 74-inch (74”) DBH Black cottonwood. The arborist visited the site May 11, 2022. All five (5) trees are listed in good health condition with fair to good structural condition. The retaining wall at the bottom of the slope was installed within the tree protection zone (TPZ) of the Douglas Fir. The stairway was also built adjacent to the tree as close as six inches (6”) from the base. Root disturbance from the work was observed including one (1) two-inch (2”) diameter root with exposed damage 10 feet (10’) from the tree base. The retaining wall at the bottom of the slope was constructed up to the base of the Bigleaf Maple. Based on the cut in the slope the arborist believes the majority of the structural roots on the south side of the tree were cut possibly as close as right at the tree base. The two (2) Black cottonwoods had tree wells installed with lighting conduits; the trunk flares were buried by fill. The original soil level was used as the subbase for patio. Root cuts were observed towards the creek bed where the retaining wall closest to the creek was constructed. Offsite trees were within the impacted area. Construction impacts should be limited to six (6) times the DBH in distance from the trunk of trees to maintain structural stability. The arborist concluded that the majority of the impacts were outside of this area and likely limited to feeder roots. English ivy is located on the slope and is climbing the trees. The on-site trees appear to be in stable condition, however, the exact impacts to all trees are undetermined at the time of the authoring of the report as there was no documentation of root cutting during the development nor was an arborist present to monitor construction or assess root impacts. In the arborist’s experience, trees can take three to five (3-5) years before displaying signs of negative DocuSign Envelope ID: ABD8D32C-16ED-4293-9B4E-C0989EDCD6FC City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Wolde Critical Area Restoration Staff Report to the Environmental Review Committee LUA24-000040, ECF, CAE Report of April 1, 2024 Page 6 of 7 SR_WoldeERC_FINAL impact from construction activity. It is recommended that the invasive English Ivy be removed, the trees be assessed for retention during demolition with continued assessment during the next three to five (3-5) years. As part of the proposed mitigation plan, the English ivy would be removed, and 7,000 square feet of the critical area buffer would be replanted with native trees, shrubs and herbaceous plants. Proposed plantings include Western red cedar, Western hemlock, Douglas-fir, Pacific Dogwood, salal, baldhip rose, red flowering currant, ocean-spray, evergreen huckleberry, bleeding heart, sword fern, western starflower and meadow seed mix. A five (5) year monitoring and maintenance plan is included with the mitigation plan. It is anticipated that the City’s Critical Area regulations would adequately mitigate impacts of the restoration. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: Not applicable. 4. Historic and Cultural Preservation Impacts: The City received public comment from the Duwamish Tribe dated March 4, 2024 (Exhibit 10), that the project is located within an area that the Tribe considers culturally significant and has a moderate probability to have unknown archaeological deposits. The project is located within approximately two-and-a-half (2.5) miles of two (2) Duwamish place names and adjacent to May Creek. The DAHP WISAARD predictive model indicates that a survey is recommended with a moderate risk for encountering cultural resources. As such, the Tribe requests an Inadvertent Discovery Plan (IDP) especially if excavation cuts below the gravel fill into alluvium. In addition, the Tribe would also like to be notified if any archaeological work or monitoring is performed and be provided the opportunity to be present if or when an archaeologist is on site. The current proposal did not receive comment from the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Due to the proximity to place names and May Creek, staff recommends as a mitigation measure, that the applicant provide an Inadvertent Discoveries Plan (IDP) prepared by a qualified professional. The IDP shall be submitted with the civil construction permit application for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to permit issuance. Notice shall be provided to Concerned Tribes to have a tribal monitor on-site if archaeological work or monitoring is performed. Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant shall provide an Inadvertent Discoveries Plan (IDP) prepared by a qualified professional. The IDP shall be submitted with the civil construction permit application for review and approval by the Current Planning Project Manager prior to permit issuance. Notice shall be provided to Concerned Tribes to have a tribal monitor on-site if archaeological work or monitoring is performed. Nexus: City of Renton Comprehensive Goals and Policies, L-AA and L-46; Chapter 27.53 RCW, Archeological Sites and Resources; Chapter 27.44 RCW, Indian Graves and Records; Chapter 197-11 WAC, SEPA Rules E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or “Advisory Notes to Applicant.” ✓ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. The Environmental Determination decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within the 14 -day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). DocuSign Envelope ID: ABD8D32C-16ED-4293-9B4E-C0989EDCD6FC City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Wolde Critical Area Restoration Staff Report to the Environmental Review Committee LUA24-000040, ECF, CAE Report of April 1, 2024 Page 7 of 7 SR_WoldeERC_FINAL Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on April 15, 2024. Appeals must be submitted electronically to the City Clerk at cityclerk@rentonwa.gov or delivered to City Hall 1st floor Lobby Hub Monday through Friday. The appeal fee, normally due at the time an appeal is submitted, will be collected at a future date if your appeal is submitted electronically. The appeal submitted in person may be paid on the first floor in our Finance Department. Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are governed by RMC 4-8-110 and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office, cityclerk@rentonwa.gov. DocuSign Envelope ID: ABD8D32C-16ED-4293-9B4E-C0989EDCD6FC CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE EXHIBITS Project Name: Wolde Critical Area Restoration Land Use File Number: LUA24-000040, ECF, CAE Date of Meeting April 1, 2024 Staff Contact Andrew Van Gordon Associate Planner Project Contact/Applicant Kerrie McArthur Confluence Environmental Company 146 N Canal St Suite 111, Seattle, WA 98103 Project Location 13701 SE May Valley Rd, Renton, WA 98059 (APN 3424059113) The following exhibits are included with the ERC Report: Exhibit 1: Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Report Exhibit 2: Site Plan Exhibit 3: Stream Buffer Revised Mitigation Plan, prepared by Confluence Environmental Company, dated August 2023 Exhibit 4: Preliminary Arborist Report, prepared by Tree Solutions Inc. dated July 7, 2022 Exhibit 5: SEPA Environmental Checklist Exhibit 6: Geotechnical Report, prepared by The Concept Group dated January 18, 2023 Exhibit 7: Base Flood Elevation Study, prepared by Aspect Consulting, LLC dated July 28, 2022, revised October 11, 2023 Exhibit 8: Residential Geotechnical Mitigation Report, prepared by The Concept Group dated June 27, 2023 Exhibit 9: Critical Area Study, prepared by Confluence Environmental Company dated August 2023 Exhibit 10: Duwamish Tribe comment dated March 4, 2024 Exhibit 11: Staff Response to Duwamish Tribe Exhibit 12: Warning of Violation dated March 8, 2022 Exhibit 13: Advisory Notes DocuSign Envelope ID: ABD8D32C-16ED-4293-9B4E-C0989EDCD6FC