Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA89-116 6 M....T{ v mggvr<rre ' Q� �bf VALLK POND 1 0 T -7 _ C a b 4 . 1n .A o __ aa+d iOr F1 �. 8_ .-?La °t' c� OOi� O O �` 7 �0. 0 v, b i 8 f7• n n n n n n�n n n n • .Yb III _uGwro d<ae-d L I $1 III' 0 (:ter #all" 1 IPIIIMNICI' • —: i ri 0 UM 10 c4 - E\ It Y 6 01 a 1 n ' � I N b 5 1 1I1I } I p o y z • �.L (' — y I I .3t It j 1 .. 1.\ ;; '� ° _-d: i t 2 big �a��►` :e �� 0 f � _ '�IIIIII�III!I . " q IV,.tom may..% p 21. 0.0 .i, ' i,_ . , I ,- 1 (. il • II r, 1. IP/ _1 4*r 6- i O+ a d- r •�• n F , d "' � •'o c o n�o - — '-et � .0;�.. F I ! C lid 3 ti CI s ) 11o © o ® o " 4 F ' • 1111 1!ail asi' .1 IliNi .b �_ «b 11 i,rilcfril. ,•4_. t , _, I e i t'� �i R _i i� I i � i , i ' , t !! V- i *FE r 11 l'- ca it 1 I ii i sz A E SOURDOUGH MINING CO. RESTAURANT ✓ ► .�, + '' N s - / � . RENTON, WASHINGTON �,m ,ate MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT 15446 5fl66D RD.•SAE 410•REDMOND•WASHINGTON 98052•R06165143117 , 3 _ '..Y: E • TA MIK\‘. p • r • iii . iM -- ----& . . 1 iri • • 1 / , i r,._.„ _, 1 Iri r 1 1 1 • •, • .. • • ,.--. , ; N : B a F d• g g 8 a 8 t_ 10 It I; A Mkt t ";_ - v - f P E 1 , 7_..4- 1 1E 7 I I&Xik k-i. 1!:1, iv iffil 1 1, ; • I . : 1\ rn =ji I', 1 . • 5, 2. ,1 • _-: iji .-E8--, i 1„, ,,,) L11'0 ill ii 'LI ... ®-- I W. -_�ii Illy _ ii = \ • _., ...".".--- '1 E> ji ®_ ::_ E II IF . ',.:.i, i.! 1 . . i di :: ' I Mlle.. .. � (a II I. • - i , . iI , • _ 1 P is i e il ! • 3 s • Q M I SOURDOUGH MINING CO. RESTAURANT + no 1 REGISTERED MEW • i —4.' - RENTON, WASHINGTON - - MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT ""`°""'""'°" 16Y6 BEWtED D.•SAW ND•REDMOND,WASHINGTON RIM•RD51 ee14117 gi S i i a1 L' / ( { — T 0. m_ ti o_ 8_ ____11.:_. .4_ I o_ a --- , - -- o o ® 16 O O sSOURDOUGH MINING CO. RESTAURANT ERISTLREO S RENTON, WASHINGTON wanum MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT "1'°'"""° . 15116 ERRED RD.•SUITE 410•REUMOND.W/SEINOIOH 98052•MR 55/1117 _ _, - . • s2 • om i ►t ' . lit:Ayr ,f; ari . :3*(1 'f 1 I Imope% [ 114 1t i. • _ 1 Nil .• L c.`-9.5.9R,, apra .!:x - k-• ,. ---- 9. e YIGIN ITY tail; µ 4- I• SELF STORAGE TM :e�,r ...r ;�re.I. �e • _ .� - I..? W •ryr.S Q. / u�w r.i a T- . • irr . - + 4.y ` •� i e'lp~ lY '910UlDEw \� � c 'VV.i" I , -.6114 IL o ,,,,,,,, r Za i 0 i`e I y Y T�� et s REStAl/RANT BU/LE/NG 'I a� I z1 Q I ,,I dy` .i " Y,. 'r Y FINISH FLOCK'EL.. T150 IEr • N. Vg�g • J " E:: r•\,n't•. '+ P� may: :1. ... R- V, \ f �/ l'a a g i„ �tr�►r 9�`% ,..0, 9 % s [ \ y.. • >•• 4,, "�'"A� 14` w.o w.r.r m I ___., 7 cn ;-�;1 _w..._..,...,_ ._ ''A ° e ,.n. �oru„ .. Q w oaaNIM�leI v' `'��. \ �• 1 ,. t>`,=rq•=° r a e to%0 . '"•--' ° ,� —-- =I� -,ate .. - I-- `_.= '_i'-- �/ r.,L.r.0 rrvn _ a- e✓ �p�16 • C' ' i I�, `1 rur ' MOBILE--- MOi= t \v�e •_b^ ,• ,tom •�e O 20 �9� a III,^ TI »°" _ `9' '' 1. . `r�•. _ 'ae IL'-Ir°a •'ems T�pN "a - _ - - -. -- — �' 71 0l i.l/' srcn.S. i \Iw.rum ulw.. O 0 i ` r, :.wi;w.ir. ^-F J rn,.H M.N. 18_ ¢...r ni ,ep � . NOTES �, _ I s 11 1/ ' % L ASSi1tl4-950D.LE/.AL.—�\ a* aN 1.16-WL NcOOPLAIN GLEN.IbO/a144Ls1 _I.w'�`.r=I8 Je a \� e e e �r e P.Esn111�I11•SIT 6 Ali�qlb MT Abre AWE baN ri0• 1,5• ` 1,^ `0�`ewa e N I, IN aeLM0: .ALGA) 1. .Y,UPE bFFSI flDW..6I GS D�fY ULWV6NTIOIJIIL d 5.-SOUI6MPIPEIIM6EU'�R. 1L` flPE IF ECESSM-'1 ilia FINAL LAIL.ULATIONlI ��(C wic�'WEB uuc K.pAKW4 LOT ibMDIMb 1LlIG MJ'WM-DUNNb 144 p'VT eu''' I MOTEL 00IIALI sroit Roll M•os r an tau • 7,' I.(11.WPM.TGLY 1 NNW..F....IIM.L ELEV=.9 8B I y�unw.uN.L L'J.IK NNW.Ia.AfLO 4Y OTMERS. , lE CITY OF RED 4. y.' e i p ~et SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN gyp. I,e.?Ilt Leo 'ro"", rns — ��I� - I et#SZ . is 77 rt '8i{y R F + _ NTO tu Ma illiP 1 b s 1.—ci,y i ---0- 0 - • "c ,Di I 0 . I- cq-p -,za It4. I 1 ��Y '#a'. +1..i.,, © o 0 0 b'-o' , .,-..• , •II'_y' , II'_e' lu.O.1•. W �� II ii II tt i—• i 4,.. r L51 d Col 0 r t • • ' O p o I�l rJ I - tF�!- b_ ? 1. ' 'e. 0` CoJ1 I t • a s • i o \\ l >p'I;' •T c \ .i ' 1 r� \� \ 1 : I • O tam k fib _1�tt� . I� .�E�4.r� 4 p be I- d V'fi '. $1 {° S LI: fi 1 **,,f3/4411, .,. t _Tn.-- i •,_ ,, ,-, , : ,v : , c_ . ...• , R y i o .7,i,- . , 'LIt • 1 - fi C)—7-1t I I kill' 1. k 1 N_ - a - • i i D_ k. b 4 k IH'_a' b b o A a nc s - REGISTERED 5 SOURDOUGH MINING CO. RESTAURANT11 i 0 9 RENTON, WASHINGTON 1 7 U i v1° . MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT TO 15146 BEL RED RD.•SURE 410•REDMOND,WASHINGTON 98052•CID6)6812117 : i r 1a • 3 a d _ u . a III La Ti [ f — d. . ti0 _.� _ _' 3., 1,1 \, BEI/ 0 L , , „, _• , i • „,,,„,,,, , , 1m 111 :-: 1, ki.11,. , ,, ,, ,,11 ..: ,.., :, .,,,. _ _,.__ , „., ,,, _ _ _ , _ _____ ,_ ____ _ __ El El cal; - ,; I 1, -1AI E . p II!.1 . 02 °' II I® - . , i IIIEl.. ,,_,.,_ ,,,,,. .. LL1 1 d m ' :: ® _ IA ' w 111 III j --- I. 73J I,. n, III !,'u -- :I ! _ , II .: _ -. • I'.;.i ° -,- - " I — p�a - -ill!es. asi I FM ; 1 11€ a II ID: 1 iii 1 g g F "9- 1 SOURDOUGH MINING CO. RESTAURANT REDISTERFD RENTON, WASHINGTON xwww nDen MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT "°`"�""°"� 1e1Ee REEKED RD.•suDE am•REDMOND,WA9NINGTON 98057.Fil eeTain. . ... ... .. .. - • LE6PL DElda-iPrlo*l PK OJEor NvTes: Let z of nett nit n.-.l o..atleea ea roll... rTelaor HAMS: at a.,rm,.rw+uwwro(otroN,rmuq++fv.it .+Arb.h' ON,ear.r.wiA a.n.tC,Fr*rrou,trio oe sa ewgeN.i tpa.rt.r a'' u.h4h ebimioaTISS.ea t hm Trees t naa 1aMe: p.l Ceuny. wwew.Auerih.dru lollw.:W • exc.AA.ic, A2.1 Owooro..Pe.+T) ueiaamv et.ro a tw Sae wt.r ua.et..id a+-t w0.euw— w,ats.., Cry().¢+x urrrM:ct. ec tethereol.woe L.iihis o,th CIld SuC bu..dlhcnrner t m tub Aae+++ l.w guh.u.oht t along the,er SiM,br �1�'10 ." ErAAfr ' M"lw f''r' collar•.p le .aa.teaT : ',�'"' I+1a,(Oa' 375 ware at�Tle., o the...t.[1r liar at er vrf..... -ebPa,• 14/.HG ./ feet. 5. Sing dewy Snaerlor So.E a.. 5.233;then eaa ..I,.long meta Westerly ins o the LA10TOOOTbi: -ONO Y-11.AW.JW.F1•®CHrwu.ur- e e thencline at ea.south.e.t vu.rNr of he Southut quart.; a.c laYnTB.G7 "' o e er,e along said earth line to said Section neater' %daaLLY D< 1. N `,ei line:then Mahe.,to the point at nwnp; that — p ..h.nit.Mew (new v.a.=leul: PY.W, il..11(s, lib• X.L.0.rQ<t+r..D to o portion run east lncyiaw wwcat WOAW: rcpY9..p45,54) a im.i,wr.u.i.lth lb.eerie wn.. w l n., y eenm ` k_/' 202, 20.2.: i,sb a5L email• yG 5.�.1 V �49�M/--C iC r1�i 1 . /+fa7 • 1\\ �j�/---. i ie I CaA 0 NfG+Art+ ...0 gwrul(RUi �L Alb; 00.3211010.1.dr.9hC#i h'99 o ��\`f��1 1 �' U r�ililt oeeid.l et>v: rlcxt: tea.• . 1 4 1,L _. REQ1Tl r 1': < als.E\1 ' _ _ I ;�4 ,T'._ C.Jel..WNrr } Re -}b V...AU.D.AWWJG ^4.,ifi'i.'(- I /a �F A'neNnaJ er-21n.M2...T. &I LS a.`1: .—...• J1.1.... A.lw{a�Y �•R! /� "- '1. I-_ • _1�� wPGtIW IPOV+.i Na.Ar9uUat601V %t TArizlNr.6 q/Nb A.e TsW4.PIeTFoits o -i `illa � �`' ji TO Twu,voF o.n.,.+rta.rc.d.wIli( /, -1 ApPPOVAI.Rrs-leaJOTN.VrflciJ+ MtEA .LGGIMIbL VJGIMtN I ' 6:1. •apt. e=-dM • 'I p M. r txa.WOW.I N.ALLe.h1.o+ • y.g ce.rrrw,HMH.+ 1 {1I AK+eleoT: Meaaru,up4-.C.rar:rar Q•1 13 r1.SUWo�� I rce=,Code ctb+4f,99uC rNul9'969 ?R,t • • onetcrt+wwe.u.e Sv.Ne.M1411 Me.e..1R. .And J e,w.1H'.wa Yal (n sMlYM. at ra+nem. 4.lW.,..nJgor 0.1..n. V 4 _ I ctiu.6JbMta'c, ,uuseco. Hn.o,ut. O l ' 1(( I g%A.r.,rct., .00100 WW i fP.RAt/rt Wa.1.'lOM�rNa.11gJwf 4YSP.Y C.. • I "I' ""t"b`I I x Q I I ,1 CA Q P - I I. !; I LVAC.+4,r4" 1 1 I j i y w j I U zo • ! ❑i--Trj IF . U_44--; 4 • ) r , I VV) a ) DAIS/ I • DRAWN BY: II. 51@l ViaF-me MAP 1 Of SHEETS T C Y CF RENTOt t E C f%/ E D JUN 2 9 1990 REVISIONS DATE: '#9/'foC) �. Df�i�fNG �fVfS�O NAME ''©U1 OO&' ' M l/JMAlC� (p, R15 7 73rtJ1 Y ADDRESS: ��d (� � VA-IL /4 tP BUILDING PERMIT NO. PLAN CHECK (green) NO. KIND OF REVISION: R.i✓Vlc,(4U �F�- �("l S PL-PrK1 Vtld COMM MI REVISIONS MUST BE CLEARLY LABELED i • • SENDER:d Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items I Put your address in the"RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this card from,being returned to you.The return receipt fee will provide you the name of the person delivered to and -the date of delivery. For additional fees the following services are available. Consult postmaster for fees and check box(es)for additional services) requested. 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery (Extra charge) (Extra charge) i 3. ,article Addressed to: 4. Article Number Herman M. Allenbach //69 l 1018 SW- 144th Type of Serae ` Seattle, WA 98166 ❑ Registered CI Insured Certified ❑ COD ❑ Express Mail ❑ turn Receipt for Merchandise SA-- Always obtain signature of addressee 1/6 r�9 or agent and DATE DELIVERED. 5. Signature — Addressee 8. Addres j y�f; X requeste � �Y,Cj151 VIV j ' 6. Signature — Agent CITY OF RENTON X 7. Date of D 2 2 7991 FEB 2 5 1991 , BEL114 PS Form 3811, Apr. 1989 *U.S.G.P.O.1989-238-815 EIPT ' Ti- SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items ' 3 and 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO"Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you.The return receipt fee will provide you the name of the person delivered to and the date of delivery. For additional fees the following services are available. Consult postmaster for fees and check boxles)for additional servicels) requested. 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery ' (Extra charge) (Extra charge) 3._Article Addressed to: _ 4. Article Number l H1x1 Hagenson, P.E. I166to� Eush, Roed and Hitchings, Inc. Type of Service: ' 2009 Minor Ave E ❑ Registered ❑ Insured Certified ❑ COD Seattle,. WA 98102 El Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt e for Merchandis . Always obtain signature of addressee 5 _Illo—L' o, or agentand,DATE DELIVERED. l 5. Signature — Addressee 8. Addre�,epe�ss,,k llhire s�(A��l\iif X reques a lci a pat ) I J 6. Signature — Agent CITY OF RFNTON X Date....,....4...4, 1e‘cAA)1/4..e ja,e,vv‘p Delivery FE 2 I EN , PS Form 3811, Apr. 1989 *U.S.G.P.O.1989-238-815 DDOMEsSTIC RETUR LRECEIPT, • SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items 3 and 4. Put your address in the"RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you.The return receipt fee will provide you the name of the person delivered to and the elate of delivery. For additional fees the following services are available. Consult postmaster for fees and check boxles)for additional servicels) requested. 1. ❑ Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery (Extra charge) (Extra charge) 3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number Craig Chaney 11(55Z1v I Merrick Lentz Architect Type of Service: 15446 Bel—Red Rd. , Suite 410 ❑ Registered ❑ Insured , Redmond, WA 98052 Certified ❑ COD tRecei t ❑ Express Mail ❑ for Merchandise Always obtain signature of addressee , 66 —//4_O 9 or agent and DATE DELIVERED. , 5. Signature — Addressee 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if X reqrfrepamigeNosION . 6. Sign e — ent / CITY OF RENTON x • fa 7. Date of DDeliveryFFB 2 1 19c]� 4s;:l V P -26 -9-1 . PS Form 3811, Apr. 1989 *U.S.G.P.O.1989-238-815 IRO IF IniE"Cf1FIU'RECEIPT No. 115.5 6 8 -No. 115'5 6.7 , ' . , . NO.' - 115 5 E6: . RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FOR CERTIF,fED MAIL RECEIPT-FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED—' ' NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (S a Reverse (See Reverse) (See Reverse) SENT T f ' SENT TO • SENT TO /Z�LC/Z4/c�L� ` `_ _ /C_lG1y� rliL�U11 Iec5 'IC 1 nSS+`'I(_ r:_NO: N1:f�1 PY� tCA /1/k/-7i _ 47-Gh� ' STREET AND NO. vv < STREV AND NO. STREET AND NO. 20�� %�t �}tee-E, � G \�X ///'// /eta/'&1 ' Z/o PQ STATE AND ZIP CODES P.Q-,.STATE AND ZIP CODE } -�\\,`� (O� n / STATE AND ZIP CODE POSTAGE $ _ POSTAGE "`� (O • ��"�2on ci �'D�`Z $ POSTAGE $ CERTIFIED FEE 4 CERTIFIED FEE 4 cn CERTIFIED FEE 4 w SPECIAL DELIVERY • 4 W SPECIAL DELIVERY 4 w u- w SPECIAL DELIVERY Q ce RESTRICTED DELIVERY 4 m RESTRICTED DELIVERY : ¢ • w o RESTRICTED DELIVERY 4 z W la SHOW TO WHOM AND DATE ¢ o• we Lu w SHOW TO WHOM AND DATE w W �++ SHOW TO WHOM AND DATE w DELIVERED w4 Q H ae 1- 5 ' DELIVERED L > — DELIVERED W CA o: OC CZ w H SHOW TO WHOM,DATE,AND Z H H SHOW TO WHOM,DATE,AND < w y K .P- ADDRESS OF DELIVERY Q F- F- ADDRESS OF DELIVERY 4 2 H SHOW TO WHOM,DATE,AND 4 n co z o_ I- ADDRESS OF DELIVERY a. a o ca SHOW TO WHOM AND DATE o v d o cws d DELIVERED WITH RESTRICTED 4 SHOW TO WHOM AND DATE F„ F w SHOW TO WHOM AND DATE -1 z o DELIVERY o o. DELIVERED WITH RESTRICTED Q o. o: DELIVERED WITH RESTRICTED 4 y o z DELIVERY y o z DELIVERY o �' SHOW TO WHOM,DATE AND o = SHOW TO WHOM,DATE AND z ce ca w ADDRESS OF DELIVERY WITH Q c' W ADDRESS OF DELIVERY WITH SHOW TO WHOM,DATE AND o: RESTRICTED DELIVERY o: Q W ADDRESS OF DELIVERY WITH 4 RESTRICTED DELIVERY oe RESTRICTED DELIVERY co TOTAL POSTAGE AND FEES $ N TOTAL POSTAGE AND FEES CD $ Q' Gra. $ 6- TOTAL POSTAGE AND,FEES g POSTMARK OR DATE w POSTMARK OR DATE �� d w POSTMARK OR DATE m 00 000 J Co 0 0 4 a CITZ,, OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator February 19, 1991 Craig Chaney Merrick Lentz Architect 15446 Bel-Red Rd., Suite 410 Redmond,WA 98052 Subject: Sourdough Mining Company Restaurant Application File#SA-116-89 Location:3650 East Valley Road Dear Mr. Chaney: I recently have completed a review of the files for the above-referenced project and have determined that there has been no response to my request of January 2, 1991 for a status report from you for the Sourdough Restaurant development. There also has been no response to the City of Renton's September 18, 1990 letter regarding storm water issues related to the above- referenced project and no other indication on the part of the applicant that he is still interested in pursuing this project. If we do not hear otherwise from you by March 5, 1991,we will assume that the applicant is no longer planning to implement this project. The official file will be returned to you, if you care to pick it up from the City of Renton's Planning/Building/Public Works Department by March 12, 1991. After that, it will be destroyed according to City policy as the City does not have the space to keep inactive files. If you have any questions, please telephone me at 235-2550. I look forward to working with you in the future. Sincerely, 4,4„,„„) Lenora Blauman Project Manager t, , • LB/MS cc: Herman M.Allenbach 1018 S.W. 144th Seattle,WA 98166 Hal Hagenson, P.E. Bush, Roed and Hitchings, Inc. 2009 Minor Ave. East Seattle,WA 98102 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: 1/3/91 TO: File FROM: Lenora Blauman SUBJECT: Project status I spoke with Craig Cheney to determine the status of the application for Sourdough Restaurant,as we have had no response to the letter sent from Storm Drainage Engineering last fall describing needed changes in the storm drainage plan. Mr. Cheney believes that the owner would like to place the project on hold. He will contact Sourdough representatives to confirm whether or not this project is to be pursued now and will notify us of the outcome by letter. • I � • so CIS it OF RENTON ammo Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttmann, Administrator i s September 18, 1990 • Mr. Hal Hagenson, P.E. Bush, Roed and Hitchings, Inc. 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle, WA. 98102 SUBJECT: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT DRAINAGE PLAN Dear Mr. Hagenson: We have prepared this letter to note concerns we have with the currently proposed drainage system for this project, to inform you and your client of the potential impacts of a possible storm water capital improvement project on the off-site runoff which currently passes through the proposed project site, and to append our recommendations for the drainage system for this project. At a pre-design meeting on January 19, 1990, concerns were raised regarding the impacts of the proposed tightlining of the off-site runoff which currently passes through the site in an open drainage channel. These concerns were based on the recent significant localized flooding of the site and surrounding properties due to the January 9th storm event. Based on this meeting, the site plan was revised to maintain the off-site runoff through the site in an open channel located between the southerly parking area and the building and additional parking areas, both of which would be accessed by bridges. We have several concerns with the open drainage channel as currently proposed. Our first concern is for public safety. The width of the area designated for the open channel appears that it may not allow channel side slopes of 3:1 or less and therefore justifies the reinforced retaining walls and fencing as is shown in cross-section on the preliminary site development plan. To further address our concerns the entire open channel must be fenced with a solid fabric fence of at least four feet in height and should be signed to warn of caution during periods of high flow in the channel (which may occur several times in a given year). The second concern is that the small biofiltration swales currently proposed to be located in the bottom of this channel area appear to be of insufficient width to properly treat the runoff from the paved areas, and not to have adequate vertical separation from the bottom of the conveyance channel. In order to allow proper function and treatment, these biofiltration swales should be designed such that the lowest portion is at least 0.5 feet above the 2 year water surface elevation in the adjacent conveyance channel. The third concern is for proper maintenance which will be very difficult to maintain to perform considering the runoff that passes through the proposed project site and the limited access of the walled and fenced open channel. We are currently in the early stages of a comprehensive drainage study for the entire valley drainage basin. A result of the initial work on this study is evaluation of a capital improvement project that proposes to modify the Panther Creek Wetlands to provide regional surface water quantity control and would include enhancements for wildlife and fisheries. PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON SEP 1 9 1990 R CEWED 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 Bush, Roed and Hitchings, Inc. Page 2 This Panther Creek Wetlands project would involve plugging and abandoning the existing cross-culverts under SR-167 including the 30 inch diameter culvert that discharges immediately east of this site into the on-site channel, and construction of a box culvert and new channel near S.W. 21st Street. Plugging these culverts and establishing the new outlet would allow for additional storm water quantity control in the wetlands. This project, however, remains at least several years away following completion of the necessary studies. Some off-site runoff would continue to pass through the project site due to discharge from the channel collecting the westerly portion of SR-167 and tributary areas. The flow would be substantially reduced and would not likely flow year around. With the preparation of the comprehensive drainage study we have also noted that the capacity of the pipe system in East Valley Highway is by far the likely limiting factor that results in the local flooding of this new project site. This capacity is determined by the backwater effects generated up through the system when the outfall to Springbrook Creek at S.W. 34th Street becomes submerged. This backwater effect may actually generate a hydraulic grade line for approximately the 25 year storm event at nearly the curb elevation in front of this site. Therefore, and based on the very large contributing basin, volume below this hydraulic grade in the existing open channel cannot provide active storage volume and therefore cannot substantially attenuate flows to the surcharged downstream pipe system. In addition, the flooding which currently occurs on the motel site to the south is most likely caused by an outlet control condition generated at the outfall of the existing 12 inch diameter pipe from the on-site detention system at the inlet to the existing 24 inch cross- culvert under East Valley Highway (note that inverts are both at 11.90, see enclosed prints). Any flow above one foot in depth submerges this outlet pipe and begins to compromise the available storage in the motel's on-site detention system. Based on these facts we are recommending that tightlining of the off-site runoff through the proposed project site be reconsidered in light of the concerns noted above with the proposed fenced open channel. This new pipe system would need to be designed to meet Core Requirement #4 of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (assuming no surcharging of the existing pipe system), and to simulate the existing hydraulic conveyance characteristics (disregarding the nominal storage) of the existing channel. We would consider allowing the motel site's existing on-site detention system (36 inch and 30 inch pipe) to be used as all or a portion of the new-pipe system to replace the existing open channel provided other concerns are addressed in a hydraulic analysis to guarantee no adverse impacts from the proposed project on the motel site. This would involve constructing a new length of pipe from the point where the existing channel enters the project site southwest to the existing type II C.B. No. 4 on the motel site and constructing a new length of pipe from the control manhole No. 1 of the motel site on-site detention system to the north for connection to the existing 24 inch diameter cross culvert new pipe system. To mitigate elimination of the motel sites existing old on-site detention system the motel's on-site runoff should be directed into a biofiltration swale along the south property line of the proposed project site. Two new catch basins and approximately 260 l.f. of new 12 inch diameter culvert would be required to collect the runoff from the existing motel parking areas. A fully endorsed agreement with the owners of the motel site allowing these Bush, Roed and Hitchings, Inc. Page 3 modifications and assigning maintenance responsibility would be required prior to approval of the construction plans. We feel that there may be substantial cost savings that warrant your client's consideration of these recommendations. We also recommend a meeting following your consideration of these recommendations and will provide you any additional data we have available to assist you in your hydraulic analysis and design. If you have any questions or would like to further discuss drainage requirements for this project, please contact Ron Straka, Civil Engineer, at 277-5547. Very truly yours, Randall L. Parso s, P.E., Utility Supervisor Storm and Waste Water Utility Section 90-292:RLP:ps CC: Craig Chaney, Project Architect,Merrick/Lentz Architects Mary Savela,Assistant Planner Ron Straka, Civil Engineer, Storm and Waste Water Utility Section Gregg Zimmerman,Utility Supervisor,Plan Review Section Sam Chastain,Director,Parks Department Enclosures a, r RENTON PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �OF.lievi'oN- OCT 15 1990 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: j DPI E CIRCULATED: July 9, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 23, 1990 EFC-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant site approval to construct a 13,008 square foot restaurant building with 1,700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA: 76,000 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): 14,707 sg.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1..'' Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. 1 Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing . 10, Aesthetics 11: . Light&Glare 12: Recreation 13: Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: j ee, A 1 i ac f ''-1- ein f- Wg have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional i formation is needed to properly assess this proposal. ed-v4 i,AOP THIRD REVIEW > no Signature of Director or Authorized Re resentative Date f Rev. 6/88 Development Review Comments Sourdough Mining Restaurant 3650 East Valley Rd. July 13, 1990 1) Transportation Benefit Zone mitigation fee for Burlington Northern Industrial Park per the Valley Transportation Study. $7414.00 x 1.7455 = $12,940.97 (Cost / acre) x (No. of Acres) $1,86 x 14,708 =, $27,356.88 (Retail cost / sf) x (No. of sf) TOTAL FEE $40,297.85 Deposit to Account No. /05759//31B , ?D •4/ /J c2 .5S/ Q Su RA/y6727N Al JWLD f,? T'8Z/Spa7A. ley. eS4Gjro1Z 2) Driveway width to be 30 feet. S*oct) 077 o/.,—ate;/:c. Cem376 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION 4 ';f DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEE JUL 0 t? Iciyj441 Li r OF RENTON ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA- 161NBLIC WORKS ' + ' AMOMER SERVICES PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: : > Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13,008 square foot restaurant building with.1;700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION • TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION 'F FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT•DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREEArIONDEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 23, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 7 c hS pen 7-7" a'//h4 f,-sTiP�1�/S APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS N NOT APPROVED - DATE: l�l ��v SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AdTHORIzED REPRE•ENTATIVE ` REV. 5/90 J e - Development Review Comments Sourdough Mining Restaurant 3650 East Valley Rd. July 13, 1990 1) Transportation Benefit Zone mitigation fee for Burlington Northern Industrial Park per the Valley Transportation Study. $7414.00 x 1.7455 = $12,940.97 (Cost / acre) x (No. of Acres) $1,86 x 14,708 =, $27,356.88 (Retail cost / sf) x (No. of sf) TOTAL FEE $40,297.85 Deposit to Account No. /0./59/ 3/8- 7a, 5-5z. t3 4 ✓foci Z��. TBz/Socr,x6„5h 2) Driveway width to be 30 feet. Stioa) or Y-a Cem376 RENTON PLANNING DIVISION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET RENTON FIRE DEFT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO( • SA-1.16-89 JULPROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect REEfVE® PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:, , ' Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13,008 square foot restaurant building with 1 700'square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: " - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT R..;,, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT•DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION CURRENT PLANNING • LONG RANGE PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5:00 P.M. ON JULY 23, 1990. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:/ • APPROVED ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fir�partment access roads/lanes shall be paved - minimum width 20'; minimum height• 13' 6". Yes No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of - LSD is required. S hydrants with a minimum flow of i, o0-0 gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within is o feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within So() feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No_ All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes �! No All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No DATE: /4 9i /77a. SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 5/90 r , — - , RENTON PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: July 9, 1990 COMMENTS DUE: July 23, 1990 EFC- 116-89 APPLICATION NO(S): SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13,008 square foot restaurant building with 1,700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA: 76,000 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): 14,707 sg.ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2. Air 3. Water 4. Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy&Natural Resources 7. Environmental Health 8. Land &Shoreline Use 9. Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light&Glare 12. Recreation 13. Historic&Cultural Preservation 14. Transportation 15. Public Services (./ 16. Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified _ areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. THIRD REVIEW- 9, M Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 eNAY REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS e a 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME: 4,,e0 6r6,H rl/a ',e')'-7 U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS: ' 6-O / c r 04/1g/ 21 FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE) : I - II IV III ( ? J FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED," SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 NUMBER OF STORIES TOTAL BUILDING AREA: /'V TUg (A) 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1, USING AREA (A): 3 of,56 GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (C) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B) : IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% of (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C) (IF B+C LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 3, al SZ) GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: — ft /z_ 5-0 GPM (E) (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D) : IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D) . 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0-10 25% MAX NORTH /Z ` ADD ,16 % 11 _ 30 20% MAX EAST /S6 -le- ADD -Q- % 31 - 60 15% MAX SOUTH / z 8 ' ADD OS % 61 - 100 10% MAX WEST /SO't ADD C� 101 - 150 5% MAX TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT aSG 150 or 4-Hr WALL 0% MAX (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) Z5-76 % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: -I- $ I Z.SD ,GPM(F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: 0 GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: 3, 2 5-6 GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: L�"r � DATE: T U 1 911936 � f approved automatic sprinkler is required to protect the total structure. All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. 1 Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordinances. A second means of approved access is required. / Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum 20' ; minimum height 13"6' . ` Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 3 , 000' is required. Three hydrants with a minimum flow of 1, 000 gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within 150 feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 300 feet of the structure. An. approved automatic sprinkler is required' to protect the total structure. All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to second review. Design Engineering: Land Use: Provide final construction plans for review and approval. To include on-site and off-site street, storm drainage, sanitary sewer and water improvements. Standard sheet size is 22" x 34" . Applicant shall provide off- site street improvements to adjacent City R.O.W. per city standards if applicable. Show location of existing storm, sanitary sewer, and water lines along with connection of proposed utilities to existing utilities. Provide station and width of new driveway cuts and standard detail. Traffic Engineering: Land Use: Approved with conditions. The proposed development is located in the' Valley Transportation Benefit Zone ( (Also known as the Burlington Northern Industrial Park( . To mitigate the traffic impact, an irrevocable letter of credit for five years is required for the following amount. 95. 62 trips (1, 000 GSF) x 12 , 943 GSF x 1,237. 61 trips. Amount of irrevocable letter of credit is $243 ,886. 00. This amount is to be credited to Account No. 105 591 318 000 Not approved. Please resubmit drawing for item 2 . Utility Engineering: Land Use: Not approved. Submit - watermain improvements plans for extension of existing watermain to provide a looped watermain due to fire flow requirement above 2 , 500 gpm. Watermain plans must be per city standards for developer's extension of existing utilities. Require sanitary sewer plan for sewer connection to METRO's sewer. Require permit and s CITY OF RENTON Public Works Earl Clymer, Mayor Department Lynn Guttmann,Director July 6, 1990 • Craig Chaney Merrick Lentz Architect 15446 Bel-Red Rd, Suite 410 Redmond, WA 98052 SUBJECT: Sourdough Mining.Co. Restaurant ECF;SA-116-89 Dear Mr. Chaney: The Planning Division of the City of Renton has formally accepted the above-referenced application for Its third preliminary review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee Within three days rY on August y of that review, you will be notified that: 1) 9 st 3, 1990. scheduled for environmental review and determination, or 2)yourthat additional isinformation Icomplete s required has d to continue processing your application for environmental review. Please contact me, at 235-2550, If you have any questions. Sincerely, Mary Savela Project Manager cc: Herman M. Allenbach 1018 SW'144th St Seattle, WA 98166 • accptlr2/MS/kac 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 • • %,•• 14� CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor • Planning Division • • • • • • • • November 15, 1989 Craig Chaney • Merrick Lentz Architect 15446 Bel-Red Road, Suite 410` • Redmond, WA 98052 Subject: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant File #ECF; SA-I16-89 • Location: 3650 East Valley Road Dear Mr. Chaney: We received revised plans for the:above referenced project today and the changes are significant enough that we must-re-route the project for a second review by all City departments. The project now is tentatively scheduled for review by the Technical Review Committee on December 8, 1989. If you have any questions regarding the review process, please telephone my staff person, Mary Savela, or myself at 235-2550. • Sincerely, a d 1 -rickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/M13S:dm • cc: Ilerman M. Allenbacl 1018 S.W. 144 Street Seattle, WA 98166 • • • • • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 rflPermiln Tonal '31c-9r 19 MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT June 8 , 1990 Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant-Site Plan Review Comments Dear Mr. Erickson; This letter outlines our response to the City of Renton' s comments of December 19 , 1989 concerning the Sourdough Mining Company Restaurant site review. Our resubmittal has been delayed by reconsideration and development of a solution to the large quantity of off-site storm water that impacts the site during a large storm event . This resubmittal addresses the City of Renton's comments and concerns as follows : 1 . We are providing conceptual storm drainage and grading plans that show the following information: A. Current and planned future site elevations . B. Conceptual proposal for on-site storm drainage detention, employing a 25-year design storage/2-year release rate and utilizing biofiltration and an oil/water separator. C. Conceptual proposal to manage the impacts of off-site storm water on both the project site and adjacent properties . Meetings with Kim Scatterella and Ron Straka of the City of Renton, civil engineer Byron Dupont and architect Rick Lentz resulted in a conceptual solution to the management of off-site storm waters . The new development plan provides a storage capacity 15446 equivalent to the site' s exiting storage capacity, and BEL-REDRD. has similar release characteristics . As approved by SUITE410 Public Works , the existing storage capacity of the site REDMOND was calculated using the site' s actual performance WASHINGTON during the 25-year storm recorded on January 9, 1990 . 980 The existing storage capacity is very large, and (206)881-8117 Mr . Donald K. Erickson June 8 , 1990 Page 2 therefore a large new storage facility is required on site . We are proposing to widen the existing drainage channel to provide the required dead storage. This larger channel will also contain biofiltration swales and landscaping. To help promote the channel as a design feature, a "boardwalk" will be located along one side for its entire length. We also propose using a portion of the channel near the restaurant for patio dining during nice weather, emphasizing further the use as of the channel as a design feature. D. Site grading plan incorporating the above storm drainage management proposals while protecting the structure from flooding, and providing emergency vehicle parking during a 100-year storm event . 2 . The site plan has been reconfigured to incorporate biofiltration and promote the storm water detention channel as a design feature. This will address the City of Renton' s concerns as follows : A. As determined in a discussion between architect Rick Lentz and zoning administrator Donald Erickson, the building will not need to be relocated as earlier indicated. The orientation and location of the building and parking are considered to be vital to the commercial success of the project . The discussion also determined that the architectural treatment of the building and its materials do not violate the thematic integrity of the area, and that the project will have a positive, rather than negative impact upon the gateway to the city. B. A revised landscape plan identifies the required 2% wildlife habitat landscaping, a landscape screen between the project site and SR 167 , and a dense landscaping screen along the north property line. C. The redesigned parking area plan shows a greater landscaped area more evenly distributed throughout the parking lot . The landscaping is situated such that the impact of the lot from East Valley Road is substantially reduced. The site now includes 116 parking spaces , more in line with the 112 spaces requested by the City of Renton. D. The boardwalk along the south edge of the trench will provide the walkway from East Valley Road to the restaurant as desired by the City of Renton. Mr . Donald D. Erickson June 8 , 1990 Page 3 E. There was some concern from the previous review about covering the existing drainage channel . In this proposal , we are allowing the existing drainage to remain in a open channel , including it as a design feature. This channel is to be crossed at two locations by a vehicle bridge, and at one location by a pedestrian bridge. In one 60 ' section the drainage channel will be enclosed in a culvert under a portion of the parking area. If any clarification or further information is required to help facilitate the City of Renton's review process , please contact us . We look forward to a cooperative and expeditious resolution to these matters of concern, and look forward to approval of the Site Plan Review Process as quickly as possible. Sincerely, drLEN CHITECT di : ig C a Project Manager CC/dg j ---___tea ,_� 1 mmie . DATE 6:7 JOB NO. MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT ATTENTIO fro 15446 BEL-RED RD.•SUITE 410•REDMOND,WAStHINGTONN99805�2•)(206)881.8117 ��y/� �-- TO l /` VU PC�'U!C7l�/ RE:! f� i s- 71-0/40 1 191zW610 me-61( --r- "(-7-v-roitq- KF.*VIN(411-771-e---- WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: 0 Shop drawings 0 Prints O. Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications O Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 COPIES D TE NO. DESCRIPTION ' ( °/7 I � /40 0,61, -1,�� L t. , Crif L_. ,-„, JUN 8 1000 '9 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval XFor your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment 0 ❑ FOR BIDS DUE oo I 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO U�S�� REMARKS �bt ��d:/t_/ e9'ea (5 a3 i'('/f/t� �'Gt i G�� 6S/073 • 0 1 firr Acei-Y-r /664"i i Pie-- 45 (r di 1 / 1 a- , Gl'1° a/I/1GZ zcvkau-4, 2 4 P 7- ovi , C-I-44d6 gPi. 144' PIA -6ca mitY Z e , /-e- G /11` _ (9�' aid u/ioY GJ��LC�7 Z / 961161 COPY TO ! ` SIGNED: 0 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. _AVE. MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT „u D/.�'��d� CITYOFRF rlm February 8, 1990` FEB 9 „99® ECEivei Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Sourdough Mining, Co. Site Plan Review Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is to inform you of action being taken to address the City of Renton's comments concerning the Sourdough Mining Company Restaurant site review. We are currently responding to these concerns, and we expect to resubmit our project proposal shortly with responses to the review comments as follows : 1 . We will provide .a schematic storm drainage plan and grading plan that will show the following information: a. Current and planned future site elevations . , b. Existing off-site storm water activity on the site and our schematic proposal to manage the impacts on both the project site and adjacent sites. A meeting between architect Rick Lentz, civil engineer Byron Dupont, and City of Renton's Kim Scatterella, and Ron Straka resulted in the approval by the City of Renton to review a conceptual drainage plan based on the actual site performance during the 25 year storm recorded on January 9, 1990 . This concept will require the new project development to match the existing off-site storm water storage and release characteristics of the site. c. Schematic proposal to deal with on-site storm drainage, employing a 25-year design storage/2-year release rate, 15446 and utilizing bio-filtration an oil-water separator. BEL-RED RD. SUITE 410 REDMOND', d. Site grading plan incorporating due above storm drainage WASHINGTON management proposals while protecting the structure from 98052 flooding and providing emergency vehicle parking during (206)881-8117 a 100-year flood. Mr. Donald K. Er__;.son February 8, 1990 Page 2 2 . A re-designed site plan, incorporating bio-filtration, and addressing the City of Renton's concerns as follows : a. As determined in a discussion between architect Rick Lentz and zoning administrator Donald Erickson, the building will not need to be relocated. The orientation of the building and parking are considered to be vital to the commercial success of the project, while the architectural treatment of the building and its materials do not violate the thematic integrity of the area . In addition, it was determined that the project will have a positive, rather than negative, impact upon the gateway to the city. b. A revised landscape plan, that identifies the 2% wildlife habitat landscaping required, a landscape screen between SR 167 and the project site, and a dense landscaping screen at the north property line. c. We will provide a re-designed parking area with greater landscaping area more evenly distributed throughout the parking lot . The landscaping is situated such that the impact of the lot from East Valley Road is substantially reduced. Having reduced the visual impact of the parking lot, we will request that 125 - 127 parking spaces be permitted on the site. This development will generate a large amount of vehicle traffic and the 112 spaces requested by the City of Renton will be inadequate. We feel we are mitigating the City's concerns about excess paving areas by providing a large amount of well-placed landscaping over 18% of the revised site plan will be landscaping while reducing the potential vehicular impact upon surrounding properties, an impact that will be of future concern to the City should this project fail to provide adequate parking. This revised information will be submitted as soon as it is completed, and the site review process can proceed. We look forward to a cooperative and quick resolution to the site plan review based on these issues being adequately resolved as presented. Sincerely, illipLEN ' CHITECT r ig h- ey" K roject anage CC/dg S cc: Byron Dupont Kim Scatterella 16, - r CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: January 23, 1990 TO: Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner FROM: Kim Scattarella, Stormwater Engineering Specialist SUBJECT: MEETING ON SOURDOUGH MINING CO. RESTAURANT A meeting was held Friday, January 19 on the Sourdough Mining Co. project. Present at the meeting was Ron Straka, and myself along with the Engineer, Byron Dupont, and the architect. The meeting was requested by them regarding satisfying the drainage solution concept in their site plan. Their proposal was to do a backwater analysis based on actual measured elevations from the Jan. 9 flood, which could be classified as at least a 25 year design storm. They would determine the hydraulic grade line (high water mark), and determine the amount of dead storage available on-site. They will submit calculations showing this, and are planning to dump fill on-site, that should be documented in their soils report. We wanted them to also look at the 100 year Floodplain elevation vs. the Finished Floor elevation. They decided that they would draw up a Hold Harmless agreement from them to the owner about flooding on their site, and we requested a Hold Harmless from the owner of this site to the City in regard to flooding other sites. Another key issue is the swale that cuts through the property, that goes from northward along SR 167, and is diverted westward and exits through a 24" diameter concrete pipe under East Valley Road into the 30" concrete storm line that runs northward on East Valley Road. They wish to cover up the swale, and pipe it through the site, and put the parking lot on top. We believe that this could create a flooding problem in high water conditions, such as Jan. 9 with water backing up, unless a very large pipe was installed to carry this water. Are there any specific comments that you would have on this ? Enclosure cc: Dick Anderson CITY OF RENTON • w STORM WATER UTI___Y 001+e I/2-3/Ro • In f e cko( b� i K$fJ R/ e P -651 Afc SITE INSPECTION FORM NAME OF SITE SOUR DOWnf I/1I1W a- CO RE:SVIlie41,7 ADDRESS; 365o t✓ VIE et) COMMENTS ON DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE; 1,� {� 1 11 t 1 C o r - �D r p e `h Gt v kes i Age_ Fra ni d r' i -I i c J rVh3 wes-f ul Plrovpipe c M r Is 1 vndt%✓ E. V� trey R047dd c €449thef P h) a 30'1 J JCone• .5fv✓1tit << ("- 7 t 'G-f• Fr.on bwct c"rb, �6 Mows Aare, /(el L0 1/411% i L ivy a nor lhe /(y d+✓ 1"7 COMMENTS ON TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL; iv 0he 0+ 01'3 1-1WIZ /1.So OTHER COMMENTS RELATIVE TO PLAN REVIEW (SEE REVERSE SIDE) ; �YI J4h �/ � �1'le PIOGGI tvtG ot� accu'c--Cd §1-1 t /off 11" J f,p t�}�C, 2 5-ye6i r 0(.15 c,0 s 1b7wr (17Cei7 Cavvi,e Prow/ efrG,-e el( 464 c4.0) `, Gvar 'r Frok, 5R I&7 ',ivynor ward/ a, 4 F0UV/ tT( s -t flfdw fromtkeSov.4 _ `Plc s+reek •bottritt. ` t cS", rovy b the f ft riker an hRS &trot form So r C y / 1,7 ®ail �NS�s ��,� —6 ,p 12` aert6S . The r�a�Ovs4I trot tvls an et sv s L bel l owl i5 Go Ve{ '11,115 of r� O V e-r t�1 1 I/IV" r G�n d P cwa P -('f b stfe - LI'h CS t ov (d < po h U 17 Cr - I- re c�r-r1 �'ov, Ave_ `l-o (a or ca pc,t t -y Frog.. s Cows c ry h w c,Ku f iocA ll• e. 1-) MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RE JTON December 27 , 1989 JAN 2 1989 RECHVE1 Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AKP �IC� Zoning Administrator City of Renton Planning Division 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: Sourdough Mining Company Restaurant File ECF; SA-116-89 Location: 3650 East Valley Road Dear Mr. Erickson: We are in receipt of your December 19, 1989 letter in reference to the Site Plan Review Application currently in process . I would like to comment on the history of this project to date. Under Application Number SA-042-86, this project was approved on August 19, 1986 by the Site Plan Review Committee. The conditions attached to this approval included an emergency vehicle access easement across the adjoining motel property, participation in the traffic mitigation program, increased landscaping along the north property line, and pedestrian circulation to the motel reduced from 5 to 3 access points . The building permit plan review was also being completed at this time. The project stalled during the winter of 1986-87 because the hardship created by the excessive traffic assessment fee caused funding for the project to be rejected. The search for funding has continued since that time, with a new commitment for funding finally secured in September of 1989 . At that time the current application was submitted. In the current proposal , we addressed the issues that were made on the previous application. The recorded easement was submitted along with the application, participation in the traffic mitigation program was pledged, landscaping was provided and pedestrian circulation was improved by the combining of the parking areas with the motel . Since there have been absolutely no 15446 physical changes in these areas since the first application, there BEL-REDRD. should be no reason to require changes of the magnitude suggested SUITE410 by the latest review. REDMOND WASHINGTON 98052 (206)881-8117 t j Mr. Donald K. Erickson December 27 , 1989 Page 2 I will respond for the record to the issues raised in the current letter. 1 . Drainage concerns : The drainage issue has been a problem since we began working on this site. Currently a drainage channel runs across the subject property, and is fed from two culverts passing under Highway 167 . This channel originally fed into an open ditch running to the north along East Valley Road. Flooding was not a major problem while the open ditch was available to take the run off . The current flooding problem began in earnest when the L . I .D. funded street improvements were installed in the mid 1980s . An inadequately sized storm drain system was installed which caused excess flows to flood the properties between Highway 167 and East Valley Road during times of heavy run off . We share the City of Renton's concern that our development does not cause an additional flooding problem to the adjacent properties . However, we cannot single-handedly solve the entire problem within the confines of our property, as we are being asked to do in the December 19 letter. Several weeks ago we received what has been described as the equivalent to a ten year storm. At the peak of this storm, our property was not flooded, but the motel to the south and East Valley Road to the west were under water. We are more than willing to supply the data necessary to calculate the current detention capacity of the site, but since flooding occurs to surrounding properties during a ten year flood, it is clear that this same flooding will occur during a 25 year, 40 year, or 100 year storm. We propose to provide the same detention capability that is now afforded on site, based on the current elevations and drainage capacities . Since our site does not currently retain even the ten year offsite storm, it is not possible for us to store the 25 year offsite design flow. Our storm drainage management plan should be the system that most accurately duplicates the existing detention and release characteristics of the site - not less but definitely not more detention than is currently provided. The solution to the area drainage has to be provided either by an adequately sized line in East Valley Road or by the installation of a system like the proposed P-9 channel currently envisioned paralleling Highway 167 , both of which are not the responsibility of this project to provide. Since the flooding problem is largely due to the inadequately sized storm line placed in East Valley Road by the City of Renton, we are not willing to consider waiving our right to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or any damage to property or person arising from such flooding until such time that a mutually acceptable solution to the drainage problem is approved. Mr. Donald K. Erickson December 27 , 1989 Page 3 2 . Per the Renton Zoning Code, Chapter 4-738 (A) " . . . Site Plan Review does not include design review, which addresses the aesthetic consideration of the architectural style, exterior treatment and colors . . . " Therefore, the comments of this paragraph are not part of this review process . However, I want to note that the placement of the building is compatible with the placement of the Shurgard complex, the motel and the Sea Galley restaurant with regards to setback from Highway 167 . The materials are compatible with the motel , Sea Galley, and the Nissan dealer, and we are requested to screen the Shurgard building with heavy landscaping, which indicates that visual integrity is not deemed possible. In terms of entrance to the City, the traffic count on Highway 167 is substantially higher than on East Valley Road. Highway 167 should be considered the only legitimate "entrance" from the south. Otherwise Lind or Oakesdale, with the direct route to overpasses over I-405, are more logical "entrance" streets . Again, no situations have occurred that require a revision to the previously approved site plan, as I indicated in the introduction to this response. 3 . We are willing to modify the landscape plan as needed to satisfy the City. We ask only that the revised plan in its final form, whenever accepted, be satisfactory throughout the entire permit process without further revision. Also, the posting of a landscaping performance bond should be a condition of the construction permits . We have no objections to the landscape bond as long as it does not need to be secured until construction is authorized to proceed. 4. On-site circulation plan comments : a. Modifications to the ingress/egress points will be discussed although I believe the layout as presented conforms to all governing codes . b. The parking requirements are established as a minimum, not a maximum requirement . The project will fully utilize the parking provided, and the landscaping already provided for exceeds the requirements. There appears to be no legitimate grounds requiring revisions to the parking. c. The recorded easement granting cross-access was submitted with the current application. If this has been separated from the package, another copy will be submitted. d. Improved pedestrian circulation between the motel and this project can be proposed. Originally we had too many; now there are not enough. Some compromise should be possible. Mr. Donald K. Erickson December 27 , 1989 Page 4 When site plan approval is imminent, we will agree to participate in the Valley Transportation Benefit Zone. It is our understanding from the City's Traffic Engineering section that a major modification to this program is currently being planned. We ask that our participation be amended to comply with the new plan when that plan is adapted by the City. Don, we would like to meet with you or your designated staff person personally to discuss these points and cooperatively develop a mutually acceptable solution to the concerns presented. I will call you to set an appointment to discuss the issues and hopefully resolve these items so that our next submission will be acceptable without further modification. Thank you for your consideration to our request . Sincerely, MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT //a"-- Merrick D. Lentz , A. I .A. MDL/dcg cc: . Herman Allenbach 12/27,89 09:31 2 8857697 01 • MERRICK LENTZ ARCillikCT FACSimu,g TRAtismiTTAI, tikt4f4. r,rs7L, . . A A • . Y-if.141,, f"'/ ARCH:711:Z T3e1 el P oat! rrc •‘)-1.1tr,i , Wit ')etY•2 f)b) b 4 1 ,":.! . - - - - i L%Lf/d"J er”SL $ Yf tf7f47f UL • to Cg U t r. t h e ng the ti vf: • 1me , • of :Ade on •.e2 y no there -sted 1L%'1r•89 o9:32 a 8857697 03 Mr . Donald K . Erickson December 27 , ] 989 Page 2 I will respond for the record to the issues raised in the current letter . 1 . Drainage concerns : The drainage issue has been a problem since we began working on this site . Currently a drainage channel runs across the subject property , and is fed from two culverts passing under Highway 167 . This channel originally ted into an open ditch running to the north along East Valley Road . Flooding was rot a major problem while the open ditch was available to take the run off . The current flooding problem began in earnest when the 1, . I . D. funded street improvements were installed in the mid 1980s . An inadequately sized storm drain system was installed which caused excess flows to flooi the properties between Highway f7 and East Valley Road during times of heavy run off . we share the city of Renton ' s eor.:'ern that our development does cause an additional flooding problem to the adjacent properties . However , wN cannot, s i rgl e- handed] y solve the entire p cat•' erne wl z hin the cunt : ries of Qut property , as we are being asked to do in the December 19 letter- . everral weeks ago we received what has been described as the equivalent to a ten year storm. At the peak of this storm, our property was not flooded, but the note] to the south and East Valley Road to the west were under water . We are more than willing to supply the data necessary to .•alc'ilate the current detention capacity of the site, but sin..e flooding occc;z s to surrounding properties during a ten year flood, it is clear that this same floodi:Zg will occur during a 25 year , 40 year . or 100 year storm. We propose to provide the same :.'.etention capability that is now afforded on site , based on the current elevations and drainage capaci t7 es . Since our site does H. rill rentiy retain 0-„leen the ten real offsite storm, it is not for to 3toz e the 25 year offsite design flow . Our : ainage management plan should he the system that most dull : rates the existing detention and release .4' -� e. e of the site -- not less but definitely not more Co. r-. nt i y provided . The F,c;l of r on to tlue- area + o pr ..;v: •3ed tithe by an adequately sized ' - ne in by the installation of a system like P 9 .li-eoneji cut r ent ly envisioned paralleling H' yhway 167 , I"tsrons111il i. r j : 0}E't"* tt, . arg*'ly dui: to the : :,adeq at # . Y .," ' ;t e r r ? }.. c. : r. ..?-t Valley Road t y the ri ty •. Renton, r ..+ wr ` ; : n to • ; ...,, det waiving c.ui r . ght to hold tree . c• • rr.y i lo,iding and 'nr any dar;,age to property et; ;.: r r ' y•:r >-u h flooding until such time that a ; .1,' t • e_ _ : a• ion tothedrainage pr -,:,; eri , . approved . A 12.27/89 09: 33 2 8857697 04 • • Mr , Donald K . Erickson December 27 , 1989 Page 3 Pe. the fi.cnton Zoning Code, Chapter 4-738 (A) " . . . Site Plan Review does not include design review, which addresses the aesthetic con:;.deratiop 'J the architectural style, exterior t : +:atment and c ::lors . Therefore , the comments of this not part Ui. this review process . However, I want to :,:,te tfv., t the placement of the building is compatible with the plakxtoeot of the Shurga: d complex , the motel and the Sea Galley t.• t.h regards to setback t rcm Highway 167 . The • L•c,mpat i bi wA.h the Sea (Miley , and the .quested s..1.cen the Shut-yard • - . _ which i.ndreates that visual dNcrned pussable . In ' ern.s of entrance to the , r.. • �.�. r�+ . ,,, : E . 'uh.,tantiall _� s y higher msidered the vthevwl se Lind or • averpasses over 1 405 , are AU•f :10 situations have „_r Epp• c,ved site rz 0 , • . :zsed plan in .its final - r-r1,3'Inut the entire he post,j riq of a • • Du1d 12/27/89 09: 34 8857697 177 • 4. ., ML • - !.:.4 ! ticipate :nat a plan • 3 mgij • J 4o "'ram CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division December 19, 1989 Craig Chaney Merrick Lentz Architect 15446 Bel-Red Road Suite 410 Redmond, WA 98052 Subject: Sourdough Mining Company Restaurant File #ECF; SA-116-89 Location: 3650 East Valley Road Dear Mr. Chaney: The above referenced proposal was reviewed by the City of Renton Technical Review Committee on December 8, 1989. The Committee identified the following additions or amendments that must be made to the proposed site plan before it will be ready for review by the Environmental Review Committee: 1. Narrative materials and/or site plans which provide full information concerning: a) Current and planned future site elevations; b) Storm water run-off activity patterns/conditions affecting the site currently (without development) , based upon on-site flow and flow from nearby private and public properties; c) Storm water run-off activity patterns/conditions affecting the site with future, planned development, based upon on-site flow and flow from nearby private and public properties; d) A conceptual storm drainage management plan that sites the proposed structure at an elevation which would ensure protection of that structure and an emergency vehicle parking area during a 100 year flood, approved by the Public Works Department and the Washington State Department of Transportation (based upon the adjacent state right-of-way - - SR 167) . e) A conceptual storm drainage management plan that employs a 25 year design storage/two year design release rate, 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 Craig Chaney " December 19, 1989 Page 2 biofiltration and baffled oil/water separator, approved by the Public Works Department and the Washington State Department of Transportation (based upon the adjacent state right-of-way -- SR 167) . (Note: As a condition of approval of the proposed project, the City may require that the proponent provide a document which acknowledges that the applicant is aware that the subject property is located in an area which currently is and/or which may be subject to flooding, and that the proponents have decided to proceed , at their own volition, thereby waiving tI4eir rights to hold the municipality liable for any flooding and/or for any damage to property or person arising from such flooding. This agreement will be subject to approval by the City Attorney. ) 2 . A revised site plan which provides redesign of the structure in a way which demonstrates thematic integrity (e.g. architectural treatment, exterior building materials) with nearby commercial developments, in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts to the site and to the adjacent right-of- way, which serves as an entry way to the City. In this modified site plan consideration should be given to relocation of the restaurant building to the front of the site and relocation of the parking lot to the rear in order to enhance the aesthetics of the site and the appearance of the project from the East Valley Road. This plan is subject to approval by the Planning Division; 3 . A revised landscape plan which includes reservation of a minimum of two percent (2%) of the total area of the site for wildlife habitat landscaping, and which depicts type, number, size, and dimensions of proposed plantings. This revised landscaping plan should also include: a) a dense evergreen screen along the entire north property line will be provided to screen the adjoining warehouse from view; b) enhanced plantings of coniferous trees at the east property line, so as to provide an adequate screen between the subject site and SR 167. These plans are subject to approval by the City's landscape planner, in order to address the Landscape Ordinance and to mitigate aesthetic impacts, light impacts and glare impacts to the site and the vicinity. (Note: At the time of site plan review, the applicant will be required to post a landscape performance bond in the amount of $3 , 000. 00 to be valid for a period of three (3) years, to ensure the maintenance of plantings and irrigation systems to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. ) 4 . A revised on-site circulation plan, access plans, and. parking plans, including: a) redesign of ingress/egress Craig Chaney December 19, 1989 Page 3 points to meet Code requirements (e.g. extended driveway curb on the south side of the driveway to match the extended curb on the north side of the driveway) ; b) reduction of the number of proposed parking stalls to more closely reflect the City's requirement of 112 stalls for this proposal (a recommendation will be made to increase the landscaped area in the parking lot to replace eliminated parking stalls) ; c) the addition of cross easements for vehicular circulation between the restaurant and the motel; d) paved pedestrian walkways from the restaurant to the sidewalk along the East Valley Road and from the restaurant to the motel on the south side; e) an on-site illumination plan/signage plan that protects other properties and passing vehicles from light and glare, that meet Zoning Code requirements. These plans are subject to approval by the Public Works Department, Planning Division and Building Division. (Note: At the time of site plan approval the City will require that the applicant provide an agreement to participate in the Valley Transportation Benefit Zone (also known as the Burlington Northern Industrial Park) , in order to mitigate the traffic impacts of this project, through an irrevocable letter of credit for five years in the amount of $243,886. 00. When you have provided materials reflecting the additions and amendments listed above, we will be able to ask the Environmental Review Committee to review the proposed project for an environmental determination. Additionally, it should be noted, that when the environmental determination is made and/or at the time of site plan review, staff will likely call for additional improvements to address SEPA Rules (WAC 197-11-960) and/or Site Plan Review Criteria (Zoning Ordinance 4-738) . If you have any questions, please telephone my staff person, Mary Savela or me at 35-2550. S inc re , (: _____,) . NI Donald K. Erickson, AICP __ Zoning Administrator DKE/MBS:dm cc: Herman M. Allenbach 1018 S.W. 144 Street • Seattle, WA 98166 1 1 I i - \1 , 1 • , . 1 i --, ! ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE • STAFF REPORT December 8, 1989 , 1 i A.1 BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT: Sourdough Mining Company Restaurant ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF; SA-116-89 , DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval to I , construct a 13 , 008 square foot 1 ,. restaurant with 1, 415 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B- 1, Business Use zone. 1 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3-1650 East Valley Road 1 . 5 VY JUite 5/ — --- — --- — 1 ‘ I I . 1 A ----T-------- , . 1 G, • . 4 , _ i ( 1. . 9 .. 1 ____.. ---Z W. L. 3 4TH 5-fgEET. -.._ F 1 m.p )- . ) , 7 , , ,, /-., - . SAW)le40.17 • k (r) I-H .- oil Site. . . . 0 1 ' Arjr,A 10 le • .., .. 1 slir— :Ow sr • !- G 3 . • 1 ,t k , / — 4 -- - ---'1 ' • .. I 6 • S. Al W. 4T-ST. , STREET \ ...... p... i . - . . . .; • VALLEY EN AL , m_p 8 ? 7 : : 6 HOSPITAL . t...:—.- • . . . , ..... • . • 5 ) r 1 . 1 2 3 . - 31. , , • -...gr'. .,:t :7- ; • , , , kkrr Ir' ., • , - .• --., • . .., • . B. ISSUES: 1. Land Use Elements a. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map which designates the subject site for commercial use. The proposed .,use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Policies for Community Commercial Areas which state that such areas should provide a broader variety of uses than neighborhood commercial areas and be conveniently located to serve several neighborhoods. Located in the 3700 block of the East Valley Road adjacent to a motel and near to numerous other commercial uses at the intersection of S.W. 43 Street and the East Valley Road, the proposed restaurant meets these criteria. b. Whether the proposed use is consistent with the Land Use Map and the applicable zoning ordinances? The proposed restaurant is a use allowed outright in the B-1 zone in which the subject property is located. Parking and Loading The City of Renton Zoning Code, Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading, requires a total of 112 parking spaces for the proposed use, 105 parking spaces for the restaurant and seven spaces for the • second floor office space. The applicant has proposed 128 parking stalls. The City's Landscape Planner recommends that some of the excess parking stalls be eliminated in order to provide larger internal islands of landscaping in the parking lot. The Transportation Services Division states that the driveway curbing on the south side must be extended to match the extended curb on the north side of the driveway. The Division also states that the parking vehicle maneuvers for the first two stalls are too close to the driveway entrance and would restrict quick entry of vehicles. A drawing showing these changes must be submitted for review. Cross easements for vehicular circulation between the restaurant and the motel should be provided. Landscaping The City's Landscape Planner points out that wildlife habitat landscaping is required on site and has not been provided. A minimum of two percent (2%) of the total site must be reserved for this purpose in addition to other landscaping requirements for the site. The City's Landscape Planner also states that the landscaping should provide a dense evergreen screen along the entire north property line to screen the adjoining warehouse from view. In addition, the Landscape Planner points out that the landscaping along the east property line is rather sparse and does not screen the subject site adequately from SR 167. He recommends that coniferous trees be planted along this side to supplement the landscaping that has been proposed by the applicant. A paved walkway should be provided from the restaurant to the sidewalk along the East Valley Road. It also would be desirable to provide a paved walkway linking the restaurant with the motel to the south. c. Whether the proposed use is consistent with other uses in the vicinity? The proposed use is consistent with the other commercial uses in the vicinity. If the north property line is adequately screened by landscaping, as recommended under "Landscaping" above, the negative impacts on the proposed restaurant of the warehouse (self-storage) use to the north should be mitigated. d. Whether the proposed use will be a desirable addition to the neighborhood? The proposed restaurant should be a desirable addition to the commercial uses in this neighborhood. It will provide more variety in the services available in this part of the Valley. 2 . Environmental Elements Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with this development? a. Transportation According to the Transportation Services Division, the proposed restaurant is located in the Valley Transportation Benefit Zone (also known as the Burlington Northern Industrial Park) . To mitigate the traffic ,impacts of this project, an irrevocable letter of credit for five years is required in the amount of $243 , 886. 00. This amount is to be credited to Account #105 591 318 000 --. b. Storm Water The Storm Water Engineering Division states that a storm water drainage plan must be provided and approved before the site plan can be approved. There is periodic flooding in this area, especially during the wet season. Back water effects 'should be considered in the hydrologic modelling of the drainage plan. , Development in this area will pose significant drainage problems at this time. Future development of the P- 1 and P-9 channel projects are expected to lessen drainage problems in this area. The Storm Water Engineering Division is requiring a temporary erosion control plan with a temporary erosion control pond. On-site detention required is 25 year design storagewith a two year design release rate. The SCS hydrographic method will be used to compute detention volume with two year design release flows of pre-developed conditions matching the developed conditions: Biofiltration will be required on-site with a baffled C oil/water separator per City of Renton standards. c. Public Services/Utilities The Utilities Engineering Division requires a water plan showing water main, improvement's per City of Renton standards for developer's extension of City utilities. A, sanitary sewer plan is required for sewer connection to the Metro sewer main. A permit and approval , from Metro also is required in order to discharge into the Metro sewer main. The Civil Engineering Division will not approve the application for a Building Permit until final civil engineering drawings are submitted for Department r review. With the exception of the requirements stated above, staff report that sufficient service resources and infrastructure/utilities to serve the proposed development are available, with standard improvements (e.g. provision of sighting, signage, building identification, hydrants, secondary access) and with the payment of c appropriate system development fees. d. Light and Glare For this project, the applicant proposes parking lot lighting, building illumination, and neon signage, all of which will be utilized between sunset And 2 : 00 a.m. daily. On-site illumination should be designed so as to avoid projecting light and glare to other properties or to passing vehicles. - r e. Construction Impacts l Noie, dust, erosion, and street cleaning will be concerns during the construction of the proposed restaurant. The proponent should be required to provide a construction plan that includes an erosion control plan, a plan for hours of operation and hauling, wheel washing, a plan for sprinkling the site for dust control, and a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2 , 000. 00 to ensure that construction activities do not place an undue burden upon the neighboring properties or the municipality. , RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated, with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide a revised site plan that meets the Transportation Services Division requirements for an extended driveway curb on the south side of the driveway tQ-Ynatch the extended curb on the north side of the driveway. This site plan also will show revisions to the first two parking stalls to allow safe vehicle maneuvers entering and leaving these stalls. 2 . That, the applicant reduce the number of parking stalls to more closely reflect the' City's requirement of 112 stalls for this proposal and the excess space be used to enlarge the landscaping in the parking lot. These changes will be shown in the revised site plan. 3 . Cross easements for vehicular circulation between the restaurant and the motel will be provided. 4 . The applicant will reserve a minimum of two percent (2%) of the total area of the site, for wildlife habitat landscaping. 5. A dense evergreen screen along the entire north property line will be provided to screen the adjoining warehouse from view. 6. Coniferous trees will be planted along the east property line in addition to the landscaping proposed by the applicant, so as to provide an adequate screen between the subject site and SR 167 . 7 . That the applicant be required to . post a landscape performance bond in the amount of $3 , 000. 00 to be valid for a period of three years, to ensure the maintenance of plantings and irrigation systems to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. 8 . The applicant will provide paved walkways from the restaurant to the sidewalk along the East Valley Road and from the restaurant to the motel on the south side. 9. The proposed restaurant is located in the Valley Transportation Benefit Zone (also known as the Burlington Northern Industrial Park) . In order to mitigate the traffic impacts of this project, an irrevocable letter of credit for five years is required in the amount of $243 , 886. 00. This amount is to be credited to Account #105 591 318 00 --. 10. The applicant will provide a storm water drainage plan approved by the Storm Water Drainage Engineering Division before the site plan is approved. On-site detention required is 25 year design storage with a two year design release rate. Biofiltration will be required on-site with a baffled oil/water separator per City of Renton ' standards. ? 11. The applicant will provide an on- site illumination plan that protects other properties and passing vehicles from light and glare. 12 . The applicant will provide a construction plan that includes an erosion control plan, a plan for hours of operation and hauling, wheel washing, a plan for sprinkling the site for dust control, and a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2 , 000. 00 to ensure that construction activities do not place an undue burden upon the neighboring properties or the municipality. s D. ` COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Land Use: Approved with conditions. 1) Double cylinder or one; sided locks on bathroom doors. 2) All exterior service doors to have viewers. 3) Elimination of window in office. 4) Glass panel doors from entrance vestibule into. restaurant entry. Approved with conditions. 1) Public restroom to be fitted with lock only lockable from outside restroom. 2) Vestibule doors to have glass panel so that guests can see into restaurant. Fire Prevention Bureau: Land Use: Approved with conditions. Any development and/or construction ,. shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordinances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum 20' ; minimum height 13"6' . Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 2 , 750 is required. Three hydrants with a minimum flow of 1, 000' gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within 150 feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 300 feet of the structure. An application from METRO for approval or connection to METRO's sewer main. Storm Water: Land Use: A Temporary Erosion Control Plan is required with a Temporary Erosion Control Pond. On-site detention required is 25 year design storage/2 year design release rate. The SCS hydrograph method will be used to compute detention volume, with 2 year design release flows of predeveloped matching the developed conditions. Biofiltration will be required on-site, with a baffled oil/water separator per City of Renton standards. See comments on prior environmental review (enclosed) . (No comments enclosed. ) Water Utilities: Land Use: Not approved. Require separate water plan for watermain improvements per Renton standards for developer's extension of City's utilities. Require sanitary sewer plan for connection to METRO's sewer. Require permit from METRO to discharge. sewer in METRO system. Sewer Utilities: Land Use: Not approved. Previous comments still apply. Cannot approve site plan until final civil drawings have been reviewed and approved. Parks and Recreation: , Land Use: No comments. No comments. Building Division: Land Use: Approved. No Building Code check done. Approved. No Building Code check done. Current Planning. Division: Land Use: Approved with conditions. 1) Landscaping should provide dense evergreen screen along entire North property line to screen adjoining warehouse from view. 2) Wild life habitat landscaping is required on site and has not been provided. 2% of the total site is required in addition to other landscaping requirements. 3) Landscaping along east side (along freeway) is rather sparse. Recommend coniferous tree planting to supplement what is already proposed. 4). A paved walkway should be provided from the restaurant to East Valley Road. 5) Provide a paved sidewalk to the existing motel located to the south of this site. 6) Cross easement needed for vehicular circulation between this site and motel site. . See attached memo regarding comments. Long Range Planning: Land Use: Approved. Site is near the commercial designation @ 41st St. $ E. Valley Road, but not within it. Proposed use seems to help provide the needed variety of services for commercial development of the valley. Other Comp Plan policies related to this project include: 1) signage should compliment the building in design & placement; 2) and landscaping to southern property line to separate parking lots of restaurants and motel; See comments dated 10/31/89 . Additional floor space will require additional parking. Should meet parking ordinance requirement. ENVIRONMENTAL Police Department: Probable minor impact, - public services. Possible impacts from increased traffic in the area. What is the intended use for the 2nd floor office space? Fire Prevention Bureau: No comments. No impacts noted. Design Engineering: Probable minor impact - earth, water, transportation. More information needed - utilities. No existing or proposed utility information provided. Submit civil drawings to include, but not limited to, grading, erosion control, storm drainage, road, sanitary sewer, and water plans/profiles along with their associated details per city standards. Traffic Engineering: Probable minor impact - earth, animals, energy & natural resources, environmental health, transportation, public services, utilities. See also Land Use comments. Approved with conditions. 1. The proposed development is located in the Valley Transportation Benefit Zone (Also known as the Burlington Northern Industrial Park) . To mitigate the traffic impact, an irrevocable letter of credit for five years is required for the following amount. 95. 62 trips (1, 000 GSF) x 12 , 943 GSF x 1, 237 . 61 trips. Amount of irrevocable letter of credit is $243 , 886. 00. This amount is to be credited to Account No. 105 591 318 000 . 2 . Extend driveway curbing on the south side to match the extended curb on the north side of the driveway. Parking vehicle maneuvers for the first two (2) stalls are too close to the driveway entrance and would restrict quick entry of vehicles. Utility Engineering: Probable minor impact - utilities. Require plans for watermain improvements and extensions per city standards for developer's extension of existing utilities. Require plan for sewer connection to METRO. Require permit to obtain METRO's approval for connection to METRO sewer. Water Utilities: Probable minor impact - utilities. Require water plan for watermain improvements per City's standards for developer's extension. Require plan for sewer connection to METRO sewer. Require permit and Japproval from METRO to discharge into METRO main. Sewer Utilities: - Probable minor impact - earth, water, transportation. More information necessary - utilities. No - existing or proposed utility information provided. Submit civil drawings for review and approval. Storm Water: Probable minor .impact - water. More information needed - utilities. A Temporary Erosion Control Plan is required with a Temporary Erosion Control Pond. On-site detention required is 25 year' design storage/2 year design release rate. The SCS hydrograph method will be used to compute detention volume, with 2 year design release flows of predeveloped matching the developed conditions. Biofiltration will be required on-site, with a baffled oil/water separator per City of Renton standards. Probable major impact - water. More information needed - utilities. Parks and Recreation: Probable minor impact - recreation. More information necessary - recreation. This project is in the Valley Planning, which has a Trails Master Plan in progress and a park site to be located in the planning area. , The Parks. Comp :rl Plan does not speak to the mitigation impact, by such a project. The Dept of '? Parks & Recreation recommends the developer make a recommendation how they will mitigate the impact. The proponent has not considered any off-site recreational impacts. Some thoughts should be given to the Comp ( Park Plan which identified the Green River Valley Planning Area as a priority for a park site. Also the proponent should consider the proposed Trail Master Plan and the impact on this plan. The on-site landscaping does not provide sufficient recreational amenities. Building Division: No comments. No comments.r Current Planning Division: 1) Recommend DNS-M. 2) Provide street cleaning bond for site construction. 3) Will need to participate in Valley Traffic Mitigation Plan. 1)`'' Provide street cleaning bond for site construction, $2, 000. 00 suggested. 2) Will need to participate in Valley Transportation Mitigation Plan. Long Range Planning: Site is near other commercial uses. Would be compatible with adjacent uses. May want to add more landscaping, esp. between southern property line and parking. Signage should be kept to a minimum. May want to consider "moving" building pad to the front of the lot to hide large and expansive parking lot from view. See comments dated 10/31/89 . No change. • \ :'':;:::i:'�Y:<�:?C��:C�i:?C�:CS�:�:�i:S!:.?i:.;•::C<?::<::::;:;:,}:�:;:;:��:;:?.'{':;:;:y::j; :�i::.:.';..i:;:,:j;i:;isy :;ij'`':�:�i:�i:is�:{:::i: :L:i'�'�i':'}::ii$ii:�i:�:;:;:f;:!;:$::'$7ii$ii��i}i)iiY::::,:i`;:{;:�C`:s�:5<;:i;:i�iSy(:$:(::�:':ii$i:�iii$${Y{{{: •' EETIN .::N::: :'I E: :::::::::'<:::::::'::::::>:::::: :>::> > >: >::»::>::::::::::::>: :::::::::::::::: >::::::::;:::: • G • December 8, 1989 To: Paul Lumbert Mark Isaacson . Clint Morgan Glen Gordon •Sam Chastain Ron Olsen/Mike Benoit Penny Bryant Jim Hanson From: Don Erickson, Chairman Agenda is attached below. - TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE - AGENDA DECEMBER 8, 1989 First Floor Conference Room Commencing at 8:30 AM TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECTS • NI SOURDOUGH MINING CO. RESTAURANT 4 -.ECF;SA-116-89 (Mary Savela) Applicant seeks site plan approval to construct a 13,008 square foot restaurant with 1,415 square feet of office space on the second floor ih a B-1, Business Use zone. Project is located at 3650 East Valley Road CREEKSIDE APARTMENTS ECF; SA-119-89 (LenoralBlauman) • Applicant seeks site plan approval for a proposed 40- unit apartment complex consisting of four 3-story buildings, carports, parking, driveways and landscaping. The project is located on the north side of N.E. Sunset Blvd. approximately 200 feet west of Union Avenue N.E.• (approx. 960 foot frontage on N.E. Sunset Blvd). ROBERTSON AVIATION ECF; CU; Si4I-120-89 (Jeanette Samek-McKague) Conditional.Use permit for a two-story wood frame addition. Located at 289 Perimeter Road East. • RECONSID RATION • SUNSET PARK APARTMENTS (PHASE II) • /PROFESSIONAL BLDG. - ECF;R;SHPL;SA-100-89 (Lenora Blauman) • Applicant seeks to: 1) subdivide a 1.44 acre property into two patcels; 2) rezone Lot #1 from B-1 to R-3; 3) rezone Lot #2 from B-1 (restricted) to B-1 (unrestricted); 4) obtain specific site plan approval for a 20 unit multi-family residential complex for Lot #1; and 5) Obtain a conceptual site plan approval for commercial development for Lot #2. Project is located at 4444 N.E. Sunset Boulevard. Technical Advisory Commi Agenda December 8, 1989 Page 2 DISCUSSION Holiday schedules of TAC members. • • • • • I - - I , MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT ' November 2 , 1989 NOV 6 1989 r. Mr. Jerry Lind City of Renton Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant Dear Jerry: Per your request , here are the parking calculations for the above restaurant proposal . Subsequent to applying for the site approval we added a second floor office space to the project . This addition does not change the building's exterior elevations or footprint , and the additional area is included in the parking calculations . Ground Floor (Restaurant) : Total Square Feet = 13 ,008 sq. ft . Lobby, Vestibule, Cashier 1 ,040 sq. ft . Restrooms 785 sq. ft . Stairs 120 sq. ft . Electrical 35 sq. ft . Walls/Structure 486 sq. ft . Total 2 , 466 sq. ft . Net Square Feet = 10 , 542 . sq. ft , Second Floor (Office) : Total Square Feet = 1 , 700 sq. ft . Corridor 175 sq. ft . Walls/Structure 110 sq. ft . Total 285 sq. ft . 15446 I_-REDE41 RD. SUITE 410 Net Square Feet = 1 , 415 sq. ft . SUITE REDMOND WASHINGTON ti 98052 I (206)881-8117 t • Mr. Jerry Lind November 2 , 1989 Page 2 Parking Required: Restaurant : 10 ,542/100 = 106 stalls Office: 1, 415/100 = 14 stalls Total Spaces Required = 120 stalls Total Spaces Provided = 128 stalls If you have further comments or questions , please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ME" ' � K LENT j/TECT —/ , i / Cr. ig Chaney Projectnager40 CC/dg LM«o CITY OF RENTON "LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION October 25, 1989 Craig Chaney Merrick Lentz Architect 15446 Bel-Red Road, Suite 410 Redmond, WA 98052 Re: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant File #ECF; SA-116-89 Location: 3650 East Valley Rd. Dear Mr. Chaney: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for review by the Technical Advisory Committee on December 1, 1989. If you have any y questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact Mary Savela of our office at 235-2550. � Sin Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/MBS:dm cc: Herman M. Allenbach 1018 S.W. 144 Street Seattle, WA 98166 • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 1 i t ' OF R4,, _ .- % 0 6" 0 0 z No i ____. . %., 6, . ; . 1 : 4,-E. sEoso OF PENDING _ . . . . , ., SITE PLAN APPLICATION i ., ... P DESCRIPTION : SOURDOUGH MINING CO. RESTAURANT • 1 ky ECF;SA-116-89 %i L:1 : 6 Applicant seeks approval of a site plan to construct a 12,943 square foot restaurant located in a Business Usze (B-1) zone. , I..‘' , li.: • , . • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: ! 1 3650 E. Valley Road • ; 1 - cl! I „ r' tl PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : ;.i . Environmental Review ';4 Site Plan Approval 4' Building Permit PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ; 0 ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AN; s DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. fi FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON 1 I .,:•.!1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED ' :f.,• • WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION . _ CERTIFICATION I , Mu_1-t6 $6,V el& , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT: 3 COPIES OF • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON /0 - ‘3,7- 89 . . , ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, i and for the Stite of Washington --- I residing in , on the P7j5( S I G N E D : Marv/ jarxe,A, day of ia:rz _ /9iry OF 1?4, @ ° 1' riTEp SEPT OF PENDING . • _ SITE PLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : SOURDOUGH MINING CO. RESTAURANT ECF;SA-116-89 Applicant seeks approval of a site plan to construct a 12, 943 square foot restaurant located in a Business Usze (B-1) zone. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 3650 E. Valley Road i . PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED . Environmental Review ' Site Plan Approval Building Permit PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS A� . , DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL . THE . CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • r f~ NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Current Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: SOURDOUGH MINING CO. RESTAURANT ECF;SA-116-89 Applicant seeks approval of a site plan to construct a 12,943 square foot restaurant located in a Business Use (B-1) zone. GENERAL LOCATION: 3650 E. Valley Road. PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed in the Current Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Community Development Department, Current Planning Division at 235-2550. I S.W. 34th ST. E r _ 1 .I1 V SIT1 VAGrWT 4. ' • . �■ 6 ■ rc..u�ar+I�.. • .1,4.4064 ■ ❑ ■ [._;/} S.W. 41st ST. I � I , , \ Ilk .VICINITY MAP I _ , • . LEGAL DESCRIPTION • ___-__-. __ --� __ _ . - _ _ __® __ _ ___ _ _ —- - -- _ _ _ _ - _ _ =Let l of-Short-Plat O3!-/1-➢e.¢lb.d u Pillow.— --- - -' - - Southeast That portion of the Southwest quarter of the Soueast T _ quarter of Section 30,courtship 23 North,Range 5 that,M.M.,in Slag County,Noshing-ton,described u _ 16'-7�2 B4T RFC 11 IGfb- 142-O ' follows; r �` � Beginning at i point m w north and South tracer line of said Section welch is 250 feet North of w -le‘ -- _- t --.r/K'>?Utter�06•e'� South quarter Corner thereof;thence North 89.06.03' N --- gnat along the North line of•tract conveyed to I •t. _ I . ¢- Zvmrded uMe C. dicht and AudllorP'mylil•,BoD1s wife l696al9,by distance .`�"' 4' recorded ttee,tee.or le.•,eo w Rb.tarl it:,e et G Sao nl 1' Primary States etve ey tb. 5.a ronaemeayla lingftil C f y :/- G G L • _ \' Northerlytualen[CeSuE easterly line Noma y ' .J- �- — rf , ' 11e of ald SootLr.mt quarter of tee Soothe..; w I .�.'a LL I 1 I 'a.RlJ1�p-rEuwy quarter;thence Westerly along maid Norte line to IS 1 V 4 l I Cpgaa�p pWp, Said Section center line; tMvee Southerly tow ` 9 4 portion rlthla 1� _`G/"d I / points eAvepe swwnae�l�usrtvaLcey ROAD);EXCEPT L Q I Si act as-o' 2e'd b'�ys a+'•d 4d-d d r �: "' t 1 fi 1 f�Cf�4 the Norte•66,11 feet as measured along w West I line,w South line la parallel with the earth line. -�, ' PROJECT DATA EII Id r:-oh 1 •aerie 1 - .W ~"1• ".I p PROPOSED RESTAURANT a� ""1 J r i mu.ftGLr-Fb/, e. 2%/e Site Aras-76,033 Sq.Pt. 1 4 ' �I :rain .6I si II jy`1:5►I d �} I G I L _ • B Proposed nu-Restaurant III V) M I = J SI _1 4 0 ■CI Q I L 9 - Occupancy-m..uurmnt-A:.}• - WI v I Q Y O. p -e Occupant Load-Restaurant-9j•%Wets y' v ! i J lair:ww.cr �° p 1� �,� t «YY Construction Type-Restaurant-v-1 hr.with ILI'fLI i OI .1 M..• I sprlatl.ra J el I GI g J I I M b riD 7nYc✓ f Building Area-Allowable with 5.idea separation. 0 _Isi �' •/ab•i(alsr.J -4I ,J /y welu•1 75�::31341-=1:-itt:2:11.(froot.3'"'ai.'wer''ags 6oR t-8 25 • Y Building Height-Allwab . • _ \l .\ \� t �' 4 V Actu•1 aw•raq. U¢g— l.lyITHPJ(p 1cc.� _4� �� ' as 0 © �' Varse.wr9•) <Y .,-{ 'p --+ ,Yp�. -ryd;r No.of sea[!•.-4 ii • E—ra,µt+t C7`OJ—i .� Jraeifng-Hrgnlrw.lei• • a tI - - ! GActg•1 ISO (beo.peec.]a.C.)-- o; p• �1r" SevlMaaea- .I v _4 S —a C ■ S —� 9tansy.;Motes.: LIJF'6/ - -0 Mew:l7� 5{ Ile O'.gq'a' '� II R,O'.eA� G - V 1 ccetr.eeor to verify all aimeneioos in the field �e uN C —�. it--'II p prior too n•tructioe. My discrepancies.ball he cv 'S �. 1 Idyl brought e the att.nt ion at the Architect. -,T'I'r'- IY I I I ^o' I JI I' ,/A I� •,t�.dt/N' V All workmanship•5d.•t.ri•l.shall conform ten the �, J 6 I I / ' 1995 Uniform Building Code and e11 applicable City •• V _ of sutra codes. Emml • II The fallowing plena . be submitted to the City CC L G i G I C C L G G I G ti FR"9'liAtl vJf aL' - -- st Sutra for uri.raaod•Dpro.al pricy to lmtall- `{I ppp1�I .•Sion: it Al lied 01.NSNplumbiac \\ grave Tp tl•etrl el - • H�gy,caT iitc wy v 1.I� nesteede or • Fir.on Need von • a p6o�{++Ol.au • we tl hare.W J ire.Sprinklers Fy TN17 Fad .___ mbr1R.MA(I6mt?K� j Land.e.rioo Sprinkler. (I) v aiou.o. /\ SITE PLAN v owner: Or.Barman M.lll.nback 101/B.W. 144th Street 'VW yfk I•.4p'p' Seattle,RA 9/166 O • Architect: Merrick tenth Architect U 15446 Bel-led Road Suite"410 • Redmond.RA 95052 rw • 111 • (206) /81-/137 / E pry/p lM. {I bl • F.��!m'11 �IA.Lt 1- t- R.blitT NW R`fG6u6 GODW - 01•rIOSGNIWi �geJ.tN )L" a I�eyv.4'G*PO4hP 4f ' 4IDL4 I p - .. I. • d Show AVM.2te MMAL?%.VINi dN !inike_itAo99 . 1.,,L,--11'.1-',1_-7.--•f.-gf..7- 5,- - '4 I• Zglpaaro 0mF66 2 iw.I-o' e�wrp t6.,n Q •I.l.LOFt[ ei D( L -T-,G,�ar,4� Id cat,!<At/�R tJJio a✓O-K O fiJ • • • kill!! Meer.reetwe-nee if) ct j ' AEs13u-1 P Rea las)w1'7 eYis rd. Rem/o(R�/tom yY j '. - 3 0 pP47-10-kv La1-1..161-rr,1' RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT cOrk ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET d►, 14:!- .� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 4a01,4L` cP IX ICE y 9-k DATE CIRCULATED: November 15, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 11-29-89 4 cep ECF: -116 -89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1, 700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 14 , 708 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. ' Earth 0 ° O 2 . Air ° o ° 3 . Water 0 4 . ' Plants 0 0 ° 5. Animals 0 00 o O O 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 o O ° 7 . Environmental Health 0 ° 0 O O O 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 0 0 O 9 . Housing ° O O ° 10. Aesthetics ° O O ° 11 . Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° O O O 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° O O O 14 . Transportation ° 0 0 O ° ° 15. Public Services ✓ ° ° O ° O 16. ; Utilities ° COMMENTS: 10ka - (:5 -4ltit-� („ Cttyk.pt,e.& use w-aL- ttejlA( a 5p"--y 7 We h1ave reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . �-�- SECOND REVIEW l t7e. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 I RENTON-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF7116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: . Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant' building with 1,700 square feet of office space on the second floor in. a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT . SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-8-89 ' ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT' ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION' PLANNING DIVISION I SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE r , PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: _ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING.r PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON November 29, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED ✓, APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED H) ?WOW.) YLShrot kv ( �� wvciti, Lb 6 LOB .A.toC , &cw ' �"�` • o- Sr -Q- �resAvON . Z) /5 Irz .t— doves d-c lout lass pa, ttL . SO u.M— �` SSS Cam- , $ckd . - C/tet,t Yes (*LA-- • • • I I I � SECOND REVIEW' 9)4AAArDATE 1 I j25 q SIGNATURE DIR TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 • 1 / RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT C N1/0 m"OP Nis/o ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET t M'om,N REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: - ire_ ' Preli,e -c\imn „ ° . 1989 DATE CIRCULATED: November 15, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 11-29-89 ®p:6.® ECF -116 -89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 1. L),1 v PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1, 700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 14 ,708 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2 . ' Air ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° 5 . Animals ° ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 .. Recreation ° ° ° 13 .1, Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° ° ° 15j Public Services ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS : I i6 i/110 -e(e°" , I _ I We, have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in; which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . /i SECOND REVIEW r gav . / 1. /Ff9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ate Rev. 6/88 I RENTOly LOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAiW4ENT v DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1,700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road f TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-8-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON November 29, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED I Any development and/or construction shall .comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire D tment access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes o Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of �� csa-o is required. -3 hydrants with a minimum flow of // c'e-fr9 gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within /SU feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within 3cao feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes t./--o.... All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes o.._. All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior toseteaRickEMEires No DATE . /4// as SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 / _ 2g�/6(?9/,v i9�E'j/ �l�° /, RCQU(RCI) FIRE FLOI•I CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME Soru.2deie46"e/ ' ` 2sj' 9;e U.B•.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS ��<S D X ST 2 4ii Ea/ ,�� FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION -- CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): 1 - 11 IV 0 II V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE • ORDINARY WOOD (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW)D 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (0 NUMBER OF STORIES: • • TOTAL BUILDING AREA: l',/ 74 • 4. DETERMINE BASIC .FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): � 2 S 9 GPM CE 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: (-) IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARDp ADD UP TO 25% OF (B)PM (( 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL CB+C): CIF 8+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 3, -? -a GPM (I 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: - ADJUSTMENT: `_ I Io C7 - • . GPM (I CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF CD): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND .FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT•: _. USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAC. ADJUSTMENT • EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH /6 ' ADD 270 • 11 - 30 • 20% MAX. • EAST / / ' ADD /O • 31 - 60 . • 15% MAX. SOUTH • /, V/ ADD VO 61 -100 10% MAX. • WEST / 5-U' 1- ADD -0 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : 1-/0 CTOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: • f 1 3®IC. GPM ( • 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: ' • GPM 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) z3 CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM; INSERT 12,QJC GPM) • (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: g, uV---e, GPM ( • • `11. SIGNED: - I ATE Dom. /G • • . • . • , RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET C4' % op` .-'o4, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �c r A,®1J oN DATE CIRCULATED: November 15, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 11-29 : " 94r989 ECF -116 -89 cd APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 • PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1, 700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 14 , 708 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5 . Animals ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16 . Utilities ° X COMMENTS: Cowl mg./iris e n ks 1-- 2vr v i f on rri,00 Ast l re-a etze-ee addressed We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . lattaft,e/64 COND REVIEW Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 I • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :. SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant buildingwith 1 700 sq uare q feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-8-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION . SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE . PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT . OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON November 29, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: . APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS )( NOT APPROVED Se-2 Cold,1'►le.vt4-S d,, orio-' 1VI✓OY)Mom*' ( etJ C Lh.6,103ed , SECOND REVIEW Xt - DATE II 2-i 7/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 4 col-ooifris .. , ibAf RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ®v F�F�TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET �, `.. ? v 7989 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: a crY1 k ifr DATE CIRCULATED: November 15, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 11-29-89 ECF -116 -89 I APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 I. PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1, 700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 14 , 708 sq. ' ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE ' MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1 . Earth , ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° ° o ° ° J I ° 5. Animals °° 6. Energy & Natural Resources • `'� ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use L..--- ° ° ° 9 . Housing - ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° 7 o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation •, 14 . Transportation ' ; 1° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° ° 16. Utilities �" ° ° COMMENTS: See Attachment We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . SECOND REVIEW G% /f2 ' l/1 7/Z,a,/9, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative D to Rev. 6/88 /. DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW SOURDOUGH MINING RESTAURANT 3650 EAST VALLEY ROAD RE: Quality Restaurant 12,943 sq.ft. 1 . The proposed development is located in the Valley Transportation Benefit Zone (Also known as the Burlington Northern Industrial Park) . To mitigate the traffic impact, an irrevocable letter of credit for five years if required for the following amount. 95.62 trips x 12,943 GSF = 1,237.61 trips 1000 GSF Total for ITE Manual Amount of irrevocable letter of credit is $243,886.00. This amount is to be credited to Account # 105 591 318 000 --. 2. Extend driveway curbing on the south side to match the extended curb on the north side of the driveway. Parking vehicle maneuvers for the first two (2) stalls are too close to the driveway entrance and would restrict quick entry of vehicles. CEM/adk cem228 • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 1APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval' to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1,700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-8-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON November 29, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Transportation Services APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS '- NOT APPROVED See Attachment SECOND REVIEW / DATE l/ 2/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTH RIZED REPRESENTATIVE � REV. 6/88 Y 4 DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW SOURDOUGH MINING RESTAURANT 3650 EAST VALLEY ROAD • RE: Quality Restaurant 12,943 sq.ft. 1 1. The proposed development is located in the Valley Transportation Benefit Zone (Also known as the Burlington Northern Industrial Park) . To mitigate the traffic impact, an irrevocable letter of credit for five years if required for the following amount. 95.62 trips x 12,943 GSF = 1,237.61 trips 1000 GSF Total for ITE Manual Amount of irrevocable letter of credit is $243,886.00. This amount is to be credited to Account # 105 591 318 000 --. 2. Extend driveway curbing on the south side to match the extended curb on the north side of the driveway. Parking vehicle maneuvers for the first two (2) stalls are too close to the driveway entrance and would restrict quick entry of vehicles. CEM/adk cem228 • I .. RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 C.g.'Ie",, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET A -ilf` d <9 "A REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: `� .?. DATE CIRCULATED: November 15, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 11-29-89 ECF -116 -89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. -Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks \site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1, 700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 14 , 708 'sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR ,INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 0 0 2 . Air 0 ° o ° ° 3 . Water 0 L 4 . Plants ° J ° ° 5 . ' Animals a ° o O O 6. Energy & Natural Resources 0 ° °- 7 . Environmental Health 0 0 0 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 ° 0 o ° ° 9 . Housing a a O O O 10 . Aesthetics ° 11. - Light & Glare a 0 ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation / ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation a ° 0 o ° o 15. Public Services ° O , ° ° 16. Utilities ° 0 0 00MMENTS: 1 k-` rr,,,o - LrL h4=S voc—' U0.--5fci�a, Z a-...� a ff.-S I:C--e 1-ccrc -,_ ,L1cA.. 6 4-5 SoYv\'"- o —5/tip5 sh.46.41 L) 1 , k;:< w 44- -8 p. pu. /<- pIc w kLe 4 t ,.1 ',',.. L GLry 1-4 o `T` --L `0 1^u.� a n yry — �J�1.0—e1�� .7 ' P'"'/L S I 744 I ,' ( 2 c-ems L p GL ��` l fop h.c�S� o ,. I r a 5 7.--0.. , 'r ,, T`L_3, �_ 2 Ply„, T(� �') 51 4C. Lw-�5� ,. c�.d`3 /2,-Q` rvov) i`c----( t4-- Y We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have' expertise and have identified areas of probable, impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal L.-----2 % , SECOND REVIEW Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: _ Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1,700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a1B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-8-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION 'FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT - • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT ._ OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON November 29, 1989 . l - REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED v 1 ' SECOND REVIEW DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT >4' / ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET � e; �� `` o4 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: k��l �\st8t9 DATE CIRCULATED: November 15, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 11-29-89- N ECF -116 -89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 p------7-71 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect OV 1 5 1989 PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site app oval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1,700 square ee ice space on the second floor in a B-1, Business 'Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 14 , 708 sq. ft. f� IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° o ° ° 5 . Animals ° ° o ° ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ' 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° v ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° o ° ° 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . • SECOND REVIEW , e //4-.- // ii— 2- i--a( Sign e of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 ' I RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1,700 square feet of office space on the' second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-8-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE _ LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISI,ON OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY' 5: 00 P.M. ON November 29 , 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: \C APPROVED - APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED , I I ' SECOND REVIEW DATE //->.__/ �( SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR A T ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 f RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ' P \r . DATE, CIRCULATED: 'November 15, 1989 CENTS DUE: 11-29-89 ECF 116 -89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1,700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 14, 708 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: prtoulit, `511terf CAZOWINCo 00 rot. brit c olosrp,ucrIou1 4 z 1000 t! sucpc, Srct o , C5 Lou, PtvcrtUto IN V1444..l `( ruvra5port•rwnom tymomiolo JAM, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . SECOND REVIEW kVpd Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 y ! ' RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1,700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. ; LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-8-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION 'SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON November 29, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 11.AkiKUX DIUISIOti/wMUJI APPROVED _APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED T Can^ SECOND REVIEW T•umot, DATE )11'111 SIGNATURE OF DIRECT OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON 'COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4 r 0'° p2:49 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW,SHEET `*.` ,98 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: � h� ®� 9 DATE CIRCULATED: November. 15 1989 COMMENTS DUE: - -11 29 89 . ECF -116 -89 ; � ice., , APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 '°) NOVfr7"‘ �i4.� � 51989 �� PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect ,` .f' " i ! 1' r I!,' J'� PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with-1,700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road . SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) :',._ 14 , 708, sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON' ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° ° ° • O 2 . Air _ ° ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° ° 4 . Plantsl ° ° 5. ' Animals 0. ° ° ° ° , 6. (Energy & Natural Resources ° 0 0 7 . Environmental Health' ° . 0 ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . ! Historic & -Cultural Preservation t ° . , . ° ° ° 14 . Transportation 0 - ° ° 15. • Public' Services ' ° ° 16. 1 Utilities • ° ° ° COMMENTS: ' Q CA4144r. We have. reviewed this -application with particular attention to those areas • in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. SECOND REVIEW /11‘41440 vim--- / l�l (05, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative . Date Rev. 6/88 n RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 ( APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect ( j+ ) ! F�=a PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. RestaurAit ci„ 5 1989 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to,constru �a�tt�a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1,700 square feet t !� off dff[ c 1l/) space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. ' LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-8-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION I 1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE - LONG RANGE I PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON November 29, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED C M M --1>ArruibS 0 ,n,L 547,1444(0. .. 15444A1, an). ram, SECOND REVIEW Gam DATE A9 31/�eJ SIGNATURE OF DI• I OR OR UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ` REV. 6/88 y , . '14, ci�y�i RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 40k ox9 �/S/ ^ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ` . .`" 7 ` 1 - ,� 9 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ltla.ei . L 1e 4,1/ DATE CIRCULATED: November 15, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 11-29-89 / ECF -116 -89 APPLICATION NO (S) : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant - BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 7 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1,700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 14 , 708 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° O ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 3 . Water i ° O O O 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° ° ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics' ° ° ° ° ° ° • 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation r ° ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 15 . Public Services . ° ° ° 7 16. Utilities ° ° COMMENTS: `R6,,,„t!r „tit 'Du J (yt, lA1AT szMOt 4 ►aegou+=a,6s11 Pt=it- Citl is STerOvA02os cu. 9Eget-090A EATE4 - - 'SZEca►.mE ?LAW Fort- Sewed. [av e-rs?ma .-re. rAente, Sewed.- - Q C-c&11/E KRA iT 't' Map V Ai., far\ Mt'iYt-o To V)1,cit o -et , &eWE41. i,•h-u r`e►9-o t • Ni Al►a , '( We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we ,\have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . At-b ON SECD REVIEW V1'q Signature of Director or Authorized Representative IP Date Rev. 6/88 , RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1,700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-8-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION ,4p7c55-P O/¢_g/ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU [UTILITY APPROVAL S9A"57.7 7 7 ?/D,$'ZO goo/ v� LATE COMERS AGREE ::)' 0iTE4 A!p POLICE DEPARTMENT LATE COMERS AGREEM:`.- SE1JfsK ,Es /F p/.eez4'GONrVEigi SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C::'+ Am me y,,Es W!D4 7G"o33_p'='�30¢/.92 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ' ` ' TEM DEVELOPMENT G::.:... . Sevwe : 1/Fs�:Geyt X ?b 4930=43,ai/•32 BUILDING DIVISION SPECIAL SrASSESAEPIT Pan ! � IJ47E-g No _ m�I SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ft E°s -SEAE]p t1/D„ 9p� PLANNING DIVISION APPROVED WATER PLAN —�-s J Reati ,E APPROVED SEWER PW4, RataiRE fog (ONNaCtiolJ' 'ro HE'TRo SHORT RANGE APPRD'rED FIRE IIYDRAIS YE) LONG RANGE BY FIP?E D�'PT. -FL',".7 fr AL'C S , REQuirtep PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON November 29 , 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: t /,L/7'y DE/..I - - APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED REauite 5E=PAttATe cuATER PCAN foR ihtilogt Enrrb PER REgrt SrAwcovrtos Fog 'Drive 1890115 e;xtENsiow OF CMS uritiTiES 06.0171 SFINAW21 Sfsvalt t r cot cor+>J Sorrow T6 N erY1 o'S' skate) Re4UA.iRF FferiT Maot\ Merg-0 P Pis c1..arcce sewer!, i w N E-rge s'c s,E . SECOND REVIEW �' G v DATE i1- 16- g gSIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AU*lyt,V ZED RE'"'7T ENTATIVE REV. 6/88 its �r_��- 0 06,7 to tpY 11-16- S 1 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET , �� os� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: o� U-�(,14-t ,g u1 � a9,�� DATE CIRCULATED: November 15, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: 11-29-89 ��'i 9 ECF -116 -89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1,700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE. AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 14 , 708 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ?4, ° ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5 . Animals 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare 12 . Recreation 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation X ° ° 15 . Public Services ° 16 . Utilities ° X COMMENTS : A6 ery4 /N(r Az 12/,,2as v !/r74/7Y /wa/Z,,,A#770x/ P/?Or1iGO ,SabM,lk Nit( Di wlN6- Fa- F-U(QLU A 42 /46P/Z/.4-1._ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this propos 1. /ECOND REVIEW / Z7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representativel��`� ' Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAncirIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: . Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 008 square foot restaurant building with 1,700 square feet of office space on the second floor in a B-1, Business Use zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-8-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION RAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON November 29 , 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: f/q/1/ry E, e~pre kr„-/2LA-x/ .-F010.J 5444 Z EjL APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS T APPROVED pv'ecl t o()S C 4-S St t LL \y. CAA/MOT- iie ik- 577-6- �'�(i 24/7/G ij e-- G/Z//4 .D// )/4/U 1-04/ EL4P,� 40 /-71/i) ,2,,Wte a SECOND REVIEW DATE fl' Z'/ �g SI NA RE 0 DIR CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET c0AL t'P REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Rice, ;,•, 0 o�is>Q DATE CIRCULATED: October 25, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: Nov. 8, 1989 NIA��:" i�� ECF-116-89 �® APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 000 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o O 14 . Transportation ° O 15. Public Services • ✓ ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: PG a-) ) (wt.pad5 -1\7WvL- +\fai {-ice= a r We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. gAiL \ l 'k, 01 Signature of Di ctor or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU (x POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON Nov. 8, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED ✓ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DOLA,COLL CidA,vk.eWl( GV ovub MoLuk- ba.-vv-vaow dociviv Q,vl, ��SWj1 GPI DATE \\ SIGNATURE OF D ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 I ikt RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT c ' , ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ©0j, 7A'itt. 711, � % REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: frfir-eki-e,vr\ime\ _-- 1'''' 2. -4 o4' DATE CIRCULATED: October 25, 1989 CO ENT5 DUE^:,JNo 4 , 1989 4s4b .AL.:. ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect , PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 000 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° ° 2 . Air ° o ° 3 . Water ° o ° O 4 . ' Plants ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare f�r/ ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation 0 ° o ° O 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° o ° 0 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ' s 'e, 7,5; /9,9 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 '-- /,/s/.4. REQUIRE-I) FIRE FLOti•J CALCULATIONS a 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME e:PU-e.o e -`S%//A1,''940,4'i U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS 3lv'e , 59 !/,c,7,dI•)>/ ' '. FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: /.4, 9-/a 29' 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): g, U-7O GPM (B 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: -- — GPM CC. IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) ', CJ0"v GPM (D. 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: '— /, _'C7C GPM (E. (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 45-# ADD 92® % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST 73' ADD /d % 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH AY' ADD �_% 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST /55 '1- ADD -, - % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : yp (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) AD .. 'TMENT: + l Z. OCa GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: • (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM' (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: 75-O GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: �`�' `--.- e-p�° . -_-.. I ATE / 2().; ,. ,J/J 1/ V ' RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION X. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON Nov. 8, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIOAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A second means of approved access is required. Fire De artment access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13` 6". Yes____ o_—,- is Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow f required hydrants with a minimum flow of�s�i gpm each . ' is required. 4 o feet of the structure. Primary hydrant is required to be within _Foe) feet of the Secondary hydrants are required to be within structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes"No All fire hydrant are required to be i stalled and approved prior to construction. Yes No DATE ",,S//j�� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 1 d � oh • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® Op R® , ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET C�j° �g�so , - REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t t r1 �y�Ccy1 ,989 DATE CIRCULATED: October 25, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: Nov. 8, 1989 SO ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 000 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth X ° 2 . Air ° o o ° 3 . Water �( ° 4 . Plants ° O 0 ° 5. Animals ° O 0 0 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health o o ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° o 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities X COMMENTS: /10 gX/5T//J/r O(Z 0--0 ,o ED SIG/T'/ hvi=oZT/A-T l o rV ??..,00 16E6, //11 7,- add a-awm/65 70 '�C'v ��,- /t/e �//P7/T�1J 775 ��2��/NG:/ .i�Sro4v a?467°4/ 57 / 17 �.� '4 /2a'51,O/ /2 ."i.vz7 /fe', e3 r9Ga 4/6 .4J/77/ r�, //2 /�sS -v jJ�T /Gs' /9-i2 C/ri' 5-77,40vQS' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. .X"./ /G/3�/ems Signature of Director or Authorized Representative - / Date Rev. 6/88 • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION / TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: (/ UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON Nov. 8, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: //fjk„Wy /,t/G- / ppty ,e/-500741 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Aox-- C«//- ?O'V s/2/cro/v ,��LS ;�i2 /�G�/i�a'�l /1/v.0 z i "vJ-9G. MOLv12..6- O4/$/7 Q/ 2 £7// 57TG:- 57i2,f 7 STDi 51iy7N/2Y�S�"r.J.G.& Gt///-T/'i2 //1/fro�lte4�j, 7- .5 /5- zz"x31 404 CAL4/i 5/ GL R/22r//z?e- eL 5l7 57,-e of .,/, �_./14T G/ry , 'e) t.J, 1)ge air' ' PL(c./+8 E. Joc✓ v v /S77/1/ Si-D/2fti 7-7/-0 S�G��2 //)./D 9474/G Gri/Tf/ //UGGT/Oi3/ Ofi X/ST//v - �G/TES Sy/fT/d// ,z2 €J/ ?777' /2/v�4.MY 447exP7 DATE SIGNAT E 0 DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 r / X RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT r,y � op -%oN10N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE1j CT 11cv1l8 4989 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: /y-L I I. --" , DATE CIRCULATED: October 25, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: Nov. 8, 1989 �® ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant OCT 2 6 1989 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 000 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2 . Air ° ;V ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5.. Animals ° ° ° 6. '". ergy .,& Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . =1n i onmental Health ° ° ° -'8 . Land & Sterel ine Use ° ° ° ° 9 . Housing _ ° ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation , ° ° 14 . Transportation f ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities 1,/,' ° ° COMMENTS: See attachment We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . (� � ` Alai/ X /y Signature of Director or Autho ized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 t Developmental Review Sourdough Mining Restaurant 3650 Ease Valley Road RE: Quality Restaurant 12,943 Sq. Ft. The proposed development is located in the Valley Transportation Benefit Zone (Also known as the Burlington Northern Industrial Park) . To mitigate the traffic impact, an irrevocable letter of creditl for five years is required for the following amount. 95.62 trips x 12,943 GSF x 1,237. 61 trips 1000 GSF Amount of irrevocable letter of credit is $243,886.00. This amount is to be credited to Account No. 105 591 318 000 . / RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. FAKING IN L`,`` CITY OF f;,_ LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: O CTJ r13 1989 .fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 2-1-8 ENGINEERING DIVISION . TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON Nov. 8 , 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: / ,/rd, f G /4 /9 y /k, ecn tr APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED See Attachment DATE //— SIGNATURE OF DI ECTOR OR AUTHOR ED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 J5 Developmental Review Sourdough Mining Restaurant 3650 Ease Valley Road RE: Quality Restaurant 12,943 Sq. Ft. The proposed development is located in the Valley Transportation Benefit Zone (Also known as the Burlington Northern Industrial Park) . To mitigate the traffic impact, an irrevocable letter of credit for five years is required for the following amount. 95. 62 trips x 12,943 GSF x 1, 237. 61 trips 1000 GSF Amount of irrevocable letter of credit is $243 , 886. 00. This amount is to be credited to Account No. 105 591 318 000 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: U-h'I,-6$ DATE CIRCULATED: October 25, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: Nov. 8, 1989 ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 000 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5 . Animals ° 6 . Energy & Natural resources o ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° o O 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities 1/ ° COMMENTS:* 'Re-& iilC (Jcr4 FU'li I ( k rLP,kiU 1tiP I 1-0uEMh�5 .f EX-FEN' 01,1S Pea- Gfi{ S'Tf*►0rMn fvn.' pr t r�s EkT4staw E ,srwt- uzi aties �.E 6ain.e P vf<N4 e-t4 en, Cm N crime 'lb h A 'Q.G ,ne Pee-niT or, iy NO1203 APPpoIN, nor- 671•11.1 M +D Mane sEwErt, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. v i ora,Q/ II- 6- ?1 Signature of Director or Authorized Represent ve ,, ' Date [�iK, Rev. 6/88 A vg RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4 ,, 0�9�4e,��^ 04, DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET f� ;� 4980 ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 'ofi **® PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-1-89 • ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ,LoT 3 SP#40/4- UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION IIITILITY APPROVAL SUJECTT7 siosa0900/ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU LATE COMERS AGREEEIT_WATER /Vps' — LATE COMERS AGREEMT SEWER T ,ES /F k'6c7 ,v,s POLICE DEPARTMENT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT cm-e -•WA1 R �_ yes .a4.Y?G aat o3,j.F13 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHAR6E-.5(f }/,es ppe gagli-ftle3 AW.S. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SPECIALASSESSMEtTAREACHAW-WATER ,Vo BUILDING DIVISION SPECIA ASSESSCiiEur AREA NA RGE:-SEWER A/D ITROUED WATER PLUI Rkvui¢E` PLANNING DIVISION \IPf OD SEWER Pin i?rc 1a1 fott, Cad[Tsrtow N 1 P. i@iiED FIRE IiYGRANT LLOCATdar1S Y HC�sc �l SHORT RANGE BY FIRE CEPr. C:::L4£S•LONG RANGE — - --___ MAY B� R�Grui PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON Nov. 8 , 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED nor wA-tERMA-iu Ie+P Roy eKe c s FoR E)m. so, o exl3�iuG wyee.4m'ti lb 11Ro01u k WO?EO W A-T> Rh►hJ 1)u C -1v c i a ate W 'Qraui art-tErwf ABo%) 2,5oo G P r1 wrack vi Pn'14 'V uNb.ls hugs bf- Tea. G`rY S i 1-o;-nos fori. E i E-10 P eg's 63(1E1'4 slat"' OF i;xi5fiaer tutita i-it:s- # R 5 iirinA S'F W 1A, ?ups f w $-W ett cen.,a Fe,J %, h Eti►t v s S EW Ct 7( MAW t A99U- m) Ft* Ncry-6 .Fon.- pePea. or ces*Jac- ew �v N C QP>') JC--v,► L ttMJ • • A.", DATE II- = SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRE TATI\ ((�''�� REV. 6/8 8 Q.-e� //r,- �y A RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT pO/ o1i,i� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ®v 0 `/6M�oiv- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p�rti ' 19Ry DATE CIRCULATED: October 25, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: Nov. 8, 1989 ki iikb V ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION; 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 000 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° 3 . Water ° l\ ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° • ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° X COMMENTS: A Tengoreur7 Ero51<IeN, Cc-41-rro I j'leis, 15 regM ,ve-6( w7 ,) Tv-vk1rOfgey Ery 5I o,� crnItro I fo-nd. . Ov `S t 4-,-- d-e �e,v1'rtoi VGe/L,,r 4 Js. l 25 et,c 61ci7h Sfo - ye( Z yecr deny - releesc vet . Te- SC.5 hd✓0(9✓lph me-1-1,,od will. be USa fo CL,n,, J).4 c 4e#,•F,�I-(s" VOIvrne / wig, L yecir de1s ,y Ye,Ce4�sc 1�-lows o ire ceeve (0iec�Q�" y�-,,,,+c-et1`J `�'t-e, Gl'e vp I o19-L(1 GOinGP I h o�5 ppT 8 f o ri 11 �+, t o» wilt U.C' re U lr(c r on -s rte 1 '�( �a(C.1(6! 0 t/ u/°N){� !, ,<il;;dn't0/' ?c Ci4_,, ^-J ,�vt,9c,i <5'1-d,v1 4VCl e- . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. -7'04/14 0R--(f)C a 1 1 L e e'r die A V. ) 1 l'3A” Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat e� Rev. 6/88 1 P RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: ?)rmLOAW COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON Nov. 8, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED s)o% dvAIK,Alz /Agn win be re-ps/LA/ r i, cyprtv�d bpi►-e. tint 5 �e I a� �s' ho' Wra veil , he,r - is r'r(00Ai U F1ooa!7y *f aS ore- / 2-f a6Ml l y d'u(I w l"Sg-“©del . )e- p':f�. 'r'�✓�a err 1 / e f"f (A „Sh a ae ! cd �'. Co t✓7 5( c i ,',�l h�-_/�jdK0 t o y )C f y c,C a/p 1 . 1)ef/�Ce) �% `,,�1-- ) 1 - 415 v'C'q frv9 J) c 5 f1 '` ��G �r r� �,ec�j,� d i,, /�, � *,), aC J.. f`cat', t/ �U /�.,,,z,1071 ,� - /h15 1iv .( t G1,'�((/!�l t�i/IJ� bezoir -C- wolf I I� )L 0fr, c` ff�.t P-) ct oil c vt,6, ( /" ro`.c d l r.' v' 161m e/C G(A:12A DATE I/ 3`g, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 di RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT c<4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 'V®,, Q9Q% ,-� 1 p,10 % REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: f ak ira-rtrr\ �C,, - , 'l' DATE CIRCULATED: October 25, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: Nov. 8, 1989 Ite,® ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 ' PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect , PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 000 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 ° ° ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 0 o ° ° 9 . Housing ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° O 14 . Transportation ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: t .. ' , > u`-;/'C, ��'' ' '-, " ' ,,',f7 r w"%° ' ' 2 et,. :� f ,mil/ F- .-<_ il.�,<!-V -• 4,-, Q_ a /�(/"�(i'"� K"'�.L y ' .4---u �'.,A..!.- �i-.e`r__ `i';..e t'.!"/.�_.� lJI''% �.i...� ,ft_��e:1-'_--w`t_�.F,„_:.,,,, 6`�-� s;.c...�:1. i . _ ! ,�"=" •• Fsr l••,� � l �,�- •.-_ --- ` c7 .•-r'C'C, cam'."r:'_t r'_ 2^ �/')'�/��"%j� o6-6°j c�r J-4 ',, V` k` t f, 7 �' �b.i. :'-.,1>4 ff �� f 1 � � if �,.7�' �-� ,f.�- --E�GI f C_.,�r \^..-.r ..�.r ,r s. , r �-- /._i [�'if."; ?-4.(;C=.4.'_- �'�t�._- !`! �, a•C /J�!!},tG,/.�!(�s.)i4r l�s- dot✓h_e_ wi..... did-::,G:'-J.a.a•t7L-,!w^gaGt4%.w,-t, /1. !. ,/ ‘C('.�� (etelee::',..�',;, '' -`i s'7!...t5� /-A t 1f'}``n'a,.s We have reviewed this application with particular dttention to (those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this propos 1. _ 4.. 7g5r,.7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to. construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON Nov. 8, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 11 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT c 'op:94 1Si ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ®C.p °�°* � 111I ,, i , �, ,7 9 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: RU.i�Y1,Y1r 98 i 1 DATE CIRCULATED: October 25, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: Nov. 8, 1989 kb ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 000 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° o ° ° 5 . Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° o ° O 10. Aesthetics ° o ° O 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° 0 ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation . ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ditional i ormation is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,,-;-"7 1er C� , / -, /. 3D-P Signa ' of Directot-/or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON Nov. 8 , 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 2V--:7)6.- 5(/ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED A/4..) 6- .6c1,--9- 4-- `� D% DATE /(� 3 o SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 ' 1 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 07/4 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 64oneiit THZANN Vip® o�`V DATE CIRCULATED: October 25, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: Nov. 6*:28k 198g ECF-116-89 ee) APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 000 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: Q \�Co1M1 m ,tip 1)fO5 - Y}'1 I LG AT4,1�r rrp o, ' uti OE 5 n y,.-.' c_LE /v lfv(0 P.�o n)O TD - S17 I\)E Co 1 k.ucT►o�.� I 3 W� �"� Imo/ Pf t i��(1)t' - NfV U¢ t�l✓-1 -rMI rF'ic- Yr) iYtGi;i10 RAN II We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. _ � ! - L -- 9 . Signature of D�r�ector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: • 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON Nov. 8 , 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PLAQMI►UCQ DIUl1Ot'-1 • APPROVED X APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED L.AkNOSC•Ap I ruG S HOUL.Q P CO l QE SUS v � lZCniZt�V SCIZ h1 AcL O►JCS t 12.E ISO(Zrt-1 I\o Po1'7 i r L I k TO 3cR,660 NDL)o l r 1 N WAR_q.,Hous t LO 1 IiAT LNo°sC A-P- livCo 1 S IZt ul2A,O O ro /loon 1�A5 IJv7 E i PR vu c Z7o CF THE 17/kL Si 16 l S ZEG.()1`(,(J 110 00i`jic' ?U pit-Qv iZ5(_aoti2.-c.nnerv-j 1 -.,_'r1v°5cAOl1vG ALORX9 `5)L') ( AL 0Iv(/� 3`�J S. CC_©w,w„1.)to co iv I (-SRC JS TIZ Pl-C�rv� 1�v�., SvPt�t Ero i w r pmo apses i� P I\vtio 1`10 U Mtn Mo v,► co F ZO►� I �� ZCSTA-01Z1�N 1 -To Cf DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE piz-o 1 oo p►�t St oe}J/ K u uoK_TO •i1-a-E Eq.89 tug/ , 0-16(../ L OCAM -117 So°f `�'1'(�i S(e Q CIAO /11k ,1")k 110 _� l741C utAlr.„ cl to-/oh? -c, Vu -ram 4 vet, `�`I I 1-- i - RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT p laol ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET cl'1'07'4 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: l . ( i�'arnt f,�®er 3149; , DATE CIRCULATED: October 25, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: Nov. 8, 1989'O ECF-116-89 ®�� APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-116-89 , OCT 2 51989 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect ' t Lj ,' ''; ;, U: fi l' i ' t . U Cj PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road SITE AREA 76, 000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) : 13 , 000 sq. ft. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° • 3 . Water ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° . 12 . Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° . ° .O 16 . Utilities ° COMMENTS: S t—s is _ .6anlw�2cr� cJS,ds PP-01)0 L,OM i PAIZLLI a(�_ SI i.vh-1A62 - Lt-(190 Lb Zer cl,EP r qn A M,,j,m, et. /t'14-/ C4- lr- ry 77� 69k9SI Leg, MOUItJ(,s. SUIL-14,a, ap 90 Pit:+- c►tT oP 714g- LOT' -r° 141 DE LAQt-Is L-1ZPh.) 1O F-" .19'5Kln1(, (.e --- -FROM V)EI.4). We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1 EGA r - uu r,�---• 0e '�Z/ 9`! Signature of D' rector or Authorized Representative Dat Rev. 6/88 4, . RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-116-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-116-89 PROPONENT: Merrick Lentz Architect PROJECT TITLE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site approval to construct a 13 , 000 square foot restaurant in a Business Use (B-1) zone. LOCATION: 3650 East Valley Road TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED TAC DATE: 12-1-89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE l ` LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON Nov. 8, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: r � APPROVED ,. APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED �r ^� i7g Is 4 -• ylkr- C.0 rin 6 ce a c_. ESL c,Ja•r 0.4 € 5 of l 1 �. .vau.�y R.�.� B v.r-(C)r $J - (4!v_ IT:. :z 1PRoPoS b LSe- L 'evl-cs it> I-Vet-P F RgV► i b 'vliiE• o 2si'c-i A.l_. ‘ I.pP OF UAL-►Z-1. C-46AIP' 1 L 1 L K')�S rZeLA-r°' a�a7 15 osrSc-- U.x.w be': 6 sg,LJo Lie a COM LL ate,-� �►��,e 11� 1J 63a ;, Abv. U-tuba kPi►i -co S(70.ink 2y.) FrzfJPetY,-i L-+k.S -ro GgPvrtAce �'AfUGI►�� 1 � Re -0.-neor M t- 3 FZo -r Ca.rar-Iauats-- ►� l a�� nr. 712n Fr �c� �►��2c� ��s L14. _ DATE 1-10U a/M (, 19 07 SIGNATURE OF D RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 MEMORANDUM Community Development Department Planning Division DATE: November 17, 1989 TO: File FROM: Jerry Lind C41-/ Land Use Inspector/Landscape Planner SUBJECT: Sourdough Mining Company Restaurant 3650 East Valley Road File No. ECF,SA-116-89 I have reviewed the subject application and my revised land use comments are as follows: 1. The landscaping should provide a dense evergreen screen along the entire north property line to screen the adjoining . warehouse from view. 2. Wildlife habitat landscaping is required on site and it has not been provided. A minimum of 2% of the total site is required in addition to other landscaping requirements with the site. 3 . The landscaping along the east property line (SR-167 freeway side) is rather sparse. I would recommend that coniferous tree planting be done along this side to supplement what already has been proposed there. 4 . The applicant has provided more parking than what is required by code. The parking and Loading Ordinance requires 105 spaces for the restaurant (1: 100) and 7 spaces for the office space (1:200) for a total of 112 spaces. The applicant has proposed 128 parking stalls. It is my recommendation that some of the interior parking stalls be eliminated in order that: a. Larger internal islands of landscaping can be provided in the lot. The planter proposed are rather narrow. b. A paved walkway should be provided from the restaurant to the sidewalk along East Valley Road. 5. A paved sidewalk would be desirable linking the restaurant to the motel to the south. 6. Cross easements for vehicular circulation between the motel and the restaurant should be provided. JFL:sourdou:dskl0 • %• CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division • November 15, 1989 Craig Chaney Merrick Lentz Architect 15446 Bel-Red Road, Suite 410 Redmond, WA 98052 Subject: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant File #ECF; SA-116-89 Location: 3650 East Valley Road Dear Mr. Chaney: We received revised plans for the above referenced project today and the changes are significant enough that we must re-route the project for a second review by all City departments. The project now is tentatively scheduled for review by the Technical Review Committee on December 8, 1989. If you have any questions regarding the review process, please telephone my staff person, Mary Savela, or myself at. 235-2550. Sincerely, ', /d . rickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DICE/MBS:dm cc: Herman M. Allenbach 1018 S.W. 144 Street Seattle, WA 98166 . 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Farclmllp /9na) 93c-9n <c'. 0 CITY OF RENTON FILE NO(S): SA - /i -89 . 4 cm . .I ILDING & ZONING DEPART NT 'ii • -8 ru . Nrco MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of applications) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME - FEES Merrick Lentz Architect Q REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS 15446 Bel-Red Rd Suite 410 (J SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* Redmond, Washington 98052 I:3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE n ' SITE PLAN APPROVAL f34O (206) 881-8117 • SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON VARIANCE* From Section: * Justification Required NAME ' Craig Chaney 4 ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: Same as above ® SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP 0 TENTATIVE PLAT PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE FINAL PLAT U WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Herman M. Allenbach ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 1018 S.W. 144th E PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP FINAL Seattle, Washington 98166 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE (206) 243-4756 Residential 0 Q Industrial aCommercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS 3654 -E.' Valley Road- - ` ' TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING 1:::] PRELIMINARY Vacant _ B-1 - 1:::] FINAL PLANNING DIVISION PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Restaurant NUMBER OF SPACES: -cNVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE i/ . SQ. FT. ACRES '�- AREA: 7 6 ,0 0 0 fOJ'Psf Volk--- TOTAL FEES _ 4cfoo, QliO ,;31..,vmviNGDIVISIOSTAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING c:rr..or 11047c.i1 DATE STAMP APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: OCT 2 3 1989 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: V � Accepted ® Incomplete Notification Sent On_ : , By: s (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: CDAccepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: 1 (Initials) ROUTED TO: 1 Q Building Q Design Eng. Q Fire Parks 0 Police Q Policy Dev. 0 Traffic Eng. Q Utilities REVISED 1-31-84 • 1 • • Legal description of property (if more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). That portion of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter .,of Section 30 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M: , in King County, Washington, described as follows : Beginning at a point on the North and South center line of said Section which is 250 feet North of the South quarter Corner thereof; thence North 89°06 ' 0.3" East along the North line of a tract conveyed to Ivan G. Unbedacht and Phyllis, his wife, by deed of 275 feet, more or less, to the Westerly line of Primary State Highway No. 5. as condemned in King County Superior Court Cause No. 582233; Thence Northerly along said Westerly line to the North line of Said Southwest quarter; Thence Westerly along said North line to said Section center line; thence Southerly to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion within 92nd Avenue Southeast (East Valley Road) ;EXCEPT the North 446 . 71 feet as measured along the West J line, the South line is parallel with the North line. AFFIDAVIT 1, RMAPJ Pt P ►Jf7l4C•t-1- , being duly sworn, declare that I am L]authorized representative to act for the property owner, owner of the property involved in this'application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS /7 H DAY OF 0.51013E_2 19 $`1 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF . _ I WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT fm( e of Notary Public) ( . gn='tu e of fi, v .SE. D7 /e/r / " y (Address) g'Q42— (Address) • (Cit (State) (Zip) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does ' not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 OCT 2 3 i989 MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT PROJECT NARRATIVE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant Renton, Washington This proposed project is a 13 ,000 square foot restaurant, designed with a "mining town" theme both inside and outside with related artifacts located throughout the project . The restaurant will contain seating for approximately 350 , including a lounge and banquet room, with all required support facilities , and will also include home delivery facilities . There will be 128 new parking spaces provided on site for restaurant use. Adjacent motel parking presently extends onto the project site, and minor modifications to the existing motel parking configuration will be required. These changes include re-striping and adding new planting islands , and providing access between the existing and new parking lots as indicated on the plan. The Reciprocal Parking and Parking Easement Agreement is included in this application package. The high wall along the north property line is of specific concern to this project . Heavy landscaping will be used to screen the wall , with special emphasis on areas visible from the restaurant interior. The restaurant will operate from approximately 11 : 00am to 11 :00pm, with the lounge remaining open until 2 : 00am. The project will be submitted for building permit in early December, 1989, with construction estimated to begin in May, 1990 . Completion of the project and the opening of the restaurant are scheduled for October, 1990 . 15446 BEL-RED RD. SUITE 410 REDMOND WASHINGTON 98052 (206)881-8117 . .. . , ...,,,., , , •. ,,.L., ..,..,, ,......1 y .. ••••.•.,, :-,,..:.....1••• •,.••••':-..12•-•:•:•:,••.: e -:'•';',1iVi•.-4,":':';•,.• • • .: . . :. 'L.,, "•",-..••, . ...1:. ; , .•....,,,,. ....-•,..• . •••••,..• ••• ';•:fiitll:'''•••:'si••••••'.4-1'.;",..t'''•'••,,, ).'.'•,',•,';•?,;•z,':'.-,....,•-• '."....:•4•••.,it••'.1..;'•.. ....1: ,:,:.,•".?:•_ :•,.........,•,,,,•,,,,,,„1„.„,(..„1.,,,„,i,„:,...,:4.....t.„‘„,.:,,......,,,,n,... .,....„, . . •,,,,c.;... r.••„•.),......,...i.,..,...,...,•.:::..,„ ,)...,•,,.....r,.....fr..,,, ,I, ..' ; ;t:t••, , .'4,',.';,,.',...Z.:',.0.,-...1,'.;1,•i'..,I.::•,,,*ii,, ,,Xi. ..,' ..,;. . .. .'.•i.''•;"q.'. s: . ::••* *. '''......*A`....:','...•''',..i . ; ...''. • - , ‘•,....•, ,),.. ., '':%;••1'..'•''..4','''' q,','‘':,:21' '1•••.' ..,,...;'...,:,..,.•:,:,'...1'...Y.P::.W.t'e.-'4-.4.::'';•.%.:;f:',..;!'','-'•:.':•!:::%'•yc..4.)...',.2....A.• . ''. . • . . • -..,..";:'-'.}.• •••',...1. . . ••••'.:.•, •••••''a•:',..•• •........,',.....:•) ,. ','..,,',.2;,",'/.2 .:-:'2,..',... 1.,•,'.• '':''''•'.•• ,,'',i it::!.'i Ai.:1:0 .idr:;!'i•.•"?••',;',2:1 ','A• V•:;..- ;•„!.„%:•:•;.....:• •':,..'.'. ......P,•••`.11`1•';'!-''':•1•Th"•',..,i'''' '."1".r.'":44i.'."..'.:' • •••• : . . • .••*.'',..;."..‘'. ik.1• • •2.0';''''.. '.....;1•;•irP:.i.: ;'''••,'"'",;••••'•";:''''':'•:.:.....;•••••216';:••••::: :: ';•';'4,1,',;•:.:7::•';':.t.'.., ii.: , :::'''i,Y2.,1'•,":-..4%•::',•14,V" (...!•`.. .*:;;'''..,:...I,' ..-::.;4.•:•;."-:„•':.'4;;;;;+-1i'::•-',..: ',..',..4.:-"..:1''.;V:;:fit'.....2'••2 • • •".''.'...::pic.:i.1;':.":,'2. , '.....;:.2.....:. ',,•'•:,',..•'.i.i.•• ";P:':.'iC•:•;',-..",.....'2'.. ';.•:•••H, -;;!i.1,,.,11. ,:'',: 2•:•j''':if..j.`.;.••!'i•''''•'.....;;•'..'l!e•:•':•./;;•;•''''',.', :,:'••e:',)j( S..:.2. ;.".... :•.... . •!. :•;'''•';••••••;;;'•:.:: ':;!."1:•'.?`•'...•.;:i't.'''?.....'..::. •'.'',f.',%''0••••• • ••• .2:i .•-••''''ti.'1•••;'.2/-• ,)'•••'•"••1..••';.:;i•;'Y.:..'.•:: :••••••;.'••'::•.'••:•.••• •.',.. '• -':',-;',..4f.•,:‘,..• .‘• .-...i,.;•••.;:3. ',..•:..t.'•,••....:',.....'••.•.:;,.• ..',...,,'•:•1:,......:•,.:•-•••W,;,••••••• • •',•-',...••••••••-. 4".-,...,...,•,;.z.:',...',.. i.•,,...;,... :„.••,f:.-;:-.,!..,:.•!,,, ,;,,,iv....-. • • .• . . •.•....,.?,F,•,,„3':...• .....•••• ..., --,',...,•••••••••••• -•'..: :•••-•':, •••. : .....J,...74••P•-•::•.,.....,, ,,,...,.....,.... ,;...i. :••••:„..,,,I,,.....4,-)A. ,.,..,,,...,i.,::•, " t:,,;... .r•-•,;,:•,.:: /,....:•••,:),,-...;,••::'3„.,••,•:•- :•,..7•••-.,.....i.:r.c-..i.,..,.:::•,..!fivv.:-,. • '• . • ) :, .......•-•41,,,,„..., ••• .• .•,..•„•.• : •,-c-,,:„.:••• ,••••.:,.,•... „. ,.. ,• ••••,,i„N,r•.: ,.•••,..,:,:*,,,v.,L':•.';'.'. ';',...„,...;f; ',.:;:*,...,'',.7./.;:tit!•1,•',::fy II., l';i;',.1.',..:'''':•,;•‘,. :: .•';:::.,,:?::1,''l'',. :•,:1•,...••:'•::.•;-,1:::.,',•r,t•;I:•j;:•.,•'';:::'...iill'*;'. .• ; .• ••.'•..•,; ;, ' *.',:?..;:i•V.;;;r2,..,. •• :,' .....'.•;••;;;';',-;\-', ;:1.;',...,.,. •,;,.;",:•., ','i,:;r•i,-,.P",; •!i.•c,•'.cti`,......,,,,•' ,,,c,\ .,,xi.,:{',,;,?.,...4;6,. •;),•,...„),- ,•(., ...,;;„••••••.•... ..;•::•,,,...,:,••..;;••••,, ,,..:-,:•:•;.,Q•,:.,...,..,s L:...:..,/:;,..!• ,, , .• ,,, . • '..;:v-.10:-?•• s!. • ..-,....• .........,i;.i..,•,•,::•,,..;L.- .:••,,,,,,;I:,,;- ..,f.f,.,p'!,ft.4...ti: f"1".;"1;.•)';‘''t‘':',,-,•,tiZiOt,,.!' V',:p1,:p) i•,,,,:.•','..4,-,':, : .• •/,`.,i Pt; :,,;,'.t.......!..•;_,,-,,,,,•'r.' ;.•,,t,-ii,..!..,- . . :.,.,- ii-.: . -'...;-i,l';':6,!,;-'•'),..:.,.,....:.': ,-.' -...",.-1:?.0.:'••;'' • - .• ' 41-- 537 ' .,' :'r-1.., *, •••*.;,.......Q.:;:„,!:),;:i;g;.::,•...,:,%,:,,fi;',,;• ..-7',.. ,';,,;,:q•,:'.1**4•i• ;. ... • '• ' -'''.';',.,;'.:*.:',"::. *.. .. :*••••• • •';;ZI,;;. • .- ,',', ,'..,;,,,‘Y::,,r,l,";,'1' ,: ."„•• ;••..',;•.,i',..;•:. . ' . ' '"'.•••••:''`.:•:'.. .. ''.-;• :1.*".:;••:•* .DLIPL I CeiTE RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECEIPT '.1:. '.•;-i; . ; :i .•••..,.,';',. .;-:•,..>:,-.••.:;:.'. •c" •".-1'': .is'f.• _ ;,1.:•,r.‘. :,-,....,....,...;.'• :•:,;...7.ts•:.;•/..•q•fv,...s."..;'. i-1'.........'1. 11;1'. .1-t4:1:` '. . CITY OF RENTON ,••••':••• •...;: s.•:;•-• 1.1 ';."';.•'11::::':•:1::..••.:.'::::)I.' •:-''..' ;/A•:"..." • ., : ..,-.,.... ..'"..4..•..,.,„ -.. ...;•,..... • :; i;...,..., • -4.t • .'1''..•••• : ,:,.,',.•'11!.....);;0,;''•'-•',•;;'* ....:...':/':.,;..1•1';:..;,• ';;;;:-:/:J.,0','*;'.,‘•;•,••',,•:;'.:, ,i*.•,.r:‘.(;•;'te.', ',.: : '!',.',.'17,..z.;,...4.7;;'•,-P., ,....•',• ; •-.,.,•,,•.,.,, CI If TREASURER ,-.••• %.1:1:1'.'•-1,1...,i...s...,';'.' I .i•-„.1i..; ,.:::•,,.i• ,.". .....iti,-....',:',,..:. ',• ...• •.... ••••• '• •..:.'4c•.;),•,ii',..i:•. .. ,...:..:.• ...,,....,::„ . • . . -,..,•.• :';,"-,4.-1'••••• '.. i•`ir.•'PJ.... .,,,,.,z...,,.....-_,,,......;•,,,,,,v.v..f.;.„,.'-. ,• , .,.,,:,.,.,...,.. ...„-..:...,,,,,,;:.,,,..,...,,..,,r4:rr,!:•,. .,:.,.:-,,t,.,.--..;•.-,irr!..,',,..-, !,• .. • • - , ..'..-i4:'4„,..,,,,,ig-!...,...,'..-. ...,...-..... .•1!,:;•1-_,.... 10-20-1989 4419 P M •1:•,••„•. '.•,•:'"',.;,•:•'.;,:„4; ,1.41,V."1?,::;,.0;4;.Y',,!"',„Y'.*;.:.;,'';''.'-*..'..;..•••'•;..,,:•;'.;..'...•:''.'';..':.;'s•.•*•'•."-•.'..•'*•''':1''',•(',''.''1.,•*..;..:'!• -GS iR p.r 03-11797 • •',;•1,.'::'• •.''';1. i,:.::‘i-.'1;.''.•'*i'''..1''1;•'1.1.'•-•'5';'=ri,..,!..'; .:..•'') AVIER ID I ANOUNT ' 1; 4 :•:•',..r.4•.,..1!e3t;4,i';4',1r'''''?...'*.',,.:..•.'.i... •...,••, , • '.$840.00 .,..,:-:'' 1:. :'.:42,:•-c.„,'-• • • ' •'i::•••• 1...;1',...''', ..1.•, 0000 ti I°(-ELI ANF)US REVE :.• '' - 'b'ff;,*)•-•-i: . .1-,•••••••• ''*"..:1f•'*':. c I'TE FLAN API'ROYAL .,••, n. ..,•i• ... ..1:•:i,!...:•:,:',•::%):i.....:;:";-""..." .::. 1:. s.1fbi -1:•••:' • • • •.' ' :.' -.:111-1/:'''''• ' .":::-.• •. '•' '1., ••• 000 mil till .54 5„...1. ''it 1111111.) . • ',...''''.,•!;:.4\•1::':''.',':. ' '' ';' • ,',.'•::': '• griclit VII SC E LLANEOUS REVE - $150.00 ')::' •......!..',.• . •., '..t.:•'..1;..:;1';'irie'...• ••••-'.'•'•..".J.:::: '.•,...41','..v.1';-;• - . l•..;:.i'.::,114;;:::.....$:.',',i;::...';• ;•,..:::'.1; L•c,;-:?..';'i:...•" • EN‘) REV I Elii _ „ .. . ,::•,.. ,...,,-,•• ::,::. :. k%:,t,,;,. -i..':'',',. ' -':"‘,'",.,?*,A''/. . .. ''''...'''''''''''''.;".: ; .''''... • ''''.:. ' ' -nil fin ri flit "345 P4 00.001.11.1 ;,..":• • ... -;••. .....:.::::::.•:'...:.. •.1-•.',.11":1,'••"..;'• ::•••• ---.------ •,...,-. ••...ei.,,,,..••),0-,i• ••,..i...,!:........0;;-;••.-:'....,„..s../.•,.''.!•+!...f.'.:; !-•.! . . . . ••;.:,.....• :,: ;'Y'..:„ •':;$',' ;.•,.1.1.•:*:.,;;',,..,','..:.:,:',•,'.y..•' .1!`A,e.!:t50:::. '': ' TO T AL DUE : $990.00 1'ir',.. • 1.'•.*. '..''.•.'• !'",.:*'••'?".-'2', iv. ... ::: ...'• 1,',1,:fii..f.i.i: ... ' ' ,'•:',11'.1'',...'X'.:;••-- '' ' ..-:',!'. • RECEIVED IRON: :::.; •••••••:',...i 4.i'•;',:i'.•4'.-1:•;.. ,..."k:•:;•1 ..:11!..!':...- DR HERMAN il Al...LENB A CK . : - ,•....'..ii- ' .,'.;-?'`,..., . ,:,Pi '•;.. •.•'. :. ••• ;;-.4.,:i1,1:::: .•'• • •..:•1'.:gz:1:11:.?.. ....1.. • ',''.:-.'1: ..,..;r::::.••' CHECK $990.00 .. ,... i.'''; .',,: ...... ,,....,,i;-.,•...;.:'1 ..,-,I:..-,,•.;.i".1.....•:..:24.0.•,:i%," -• .. '''.• . :. .'....f.4,:'..:-.:1„:::.'':: .:::- • •'1:...:::::.' . 44 -- '.i !......:,;':..if•j,,...'•-:•::::.."i;t•1:.•''',..'".:i.':1(ii.:::,'..-.'...••-;.'::-':.:--:.... '•';';'14.:,- •. 1.'• .' '...:.•••••At',1"?•i';:;.'•;1 •'•1 ; •' ' .:;...I's: . - ...‘.,:kY.. '.,"•'::,•'.: .::::.:.' : . - 11....-.:::" 'I 0 I AL .1.EhIDEIED $990.00 I+;,.i. • , i':,..•;., • .......,..i.,"..v.......-•••••,.-•;: ..,•i.:%.•.;:.'.-.., • • . '•. . ,:. :2.-:iii:1....ti.'-.•..,. s •. ..•. '• • :,•'.•:', • : CHANGE DUE . si),,00 1••• :" '.,•.. . ''-•...'..•:-.1-.....1,..,, ',••••••'.•'...'.'•',."...tr;1'?.>.',.•:,. • ..:....;‘1.•i:1,•'.', •••• :.:.:::..',:,..•'...;•,''..,11.-i; '',•.: ,.-• i..r a1. .;'••'•• :• , • 2.•••i....',rep,‘.. .: - .: ,:. ,...,y....,: . - ki;1•...:. :.:::',.".....; ' ::1.'I: ..:•'.?•':',!*.-'.. •.;.,.••••:,‘:'.. "i...,,ti.9. .. . ,;••,.:.f.' ..',.•':':-.,;.'.'::e.'1•Y.....:.;if:•••••.'.,: '.'.'.;',''',I. ' : • • -...1.'Ii•V ' .". '''''::: •-•''';''. '1' DUPLICATE RECEIPT DUPLICATE RECEIPT ;.:.i.' • '",'„.;•:,, ...,, .::...::,::::•../,;‘:,:,,,1.i.1:::.r. ..:::“"•,::•, ....:;;'•'',.':'....%;,1•'.1.7...•ti';1••• ' • :•• ' : . :1.1.,..g.,...i:-.,, ;••••,- ..::,•i•:'. : - •,:•,..?i:•.• ; : daf .;•, .•••••,!.....i• -,,,,,:... ....:4..„,...,.:..,,,,,• •••, • ..••,o:•,i,,,, • . : •.•,.• 4,1'!,1'1:4."•;•,-...••':;-,2.2.: ..:.',...: , O,j-i A_ €_, Fr-0V • •:....,,:,,, ,,•.t.'•7•... .:. ••.•;.-...' ••• I.•'.•'..• , ..;.• .-,k....••,• ,:',..'..•i".7•......•,-•!........',:ii.....,..••, ••...r,•::-z....!;6;.•• . -• • • .... -7,4.4:0"•:.:.'. •••‘:•:!,. -. '...;%:',,.;L:-... .,-,:-.. .,:-...,..,• ... •.-'...•, ••,.i..,,,,••,•:v,.•-••.•, • • . ,,,T1,,,ri,,,, • 4. i•''.-....' 1''•••:•:'. . .:.,'.:.,'•:.,...: .,',',.•., '••..',"::,.'•:........-, •.',1,,T...:(....'. • : . ,';,.:1,. .,,,..., ..:., ,,'......•... .•..,•::,.:.,.-:• • • ';•.-,''•,. ' ..!'•.I.";,I?..!.•...,...i.l.gi.,'4,',v....::61-'.,.:.:.".•.,.•7•••1'.:.,1•.••::•.••••••-•;•••..•:..,•,'':;..•.;...,;•...:-:.:.:•.-.':•..••"•.•,"•;•'-i,.•..,;i.i,'.',..••',•••:.:'...:....,.•'•...z.:..:";.?'•,';•:..'.-.,';.:"'...:'•,••''•••••'•'.:':'.:•::•''.-•••1:::',•-;::••'•,.••;•:••:'.,.1.::,',':•.:••.:, ..'!i:"••:.,''!;;,•',.;I il..7,......,..,..:..,,-'I:.•'•::•.:.,''.•`i'•,"'C:'•'-•-,-''4k;'-';''.;••,'•'-•.-,•';1-•'.•••••i'•••'.•::'•'.-•.-•''-:,';"''-'1....-.:'.•;•;-'.:•,-'.'•..•',•''•:.,•',:•:.:.-'•c•..*.'87,-(,4.7;.t3.-.i',1'• .••. ,'. l ...,;•.•.-,;:,••:•...,•"...'•..,...'.•,.::.'•,••..,.•.....".:-.,,...•.•.,'..."•',..s„:••.•.'':•:•'.•-•.':,•'..:i...;1yI.,•.•;•••:-:.,i'-.;•,..'-.".......;':..?•;„.•.•;,.`.f:•..;"',,.,•,....•...•,•••'-•:,'.',.:•.'.•,.T,,;•;•'7.-.1.'..,,..;••'•:''...'•....••..•,'•.''•:..;',''',','X•„'d'i.,'irg:iV'-4-'r,''';:.11;7%• f3' .i , itc i , : . -i.•.1t",4',...6:,„'9;"•,1'••.' .,-•. • .•,,,f;,,.•,,..•••'2 .•.......•.....:•:::•••:•-.)1..i,.-:',.. ,•••••••••••• ••••VeY" '..i ,•,:, .. -... .„..,:;..:,'...?....;‘,,,!..;.:.).'Ii.v:::.'i.:,,..'',";:•:;.„-:,;...,..,,',:,,,,,i,,,A4;•.: • - .•-:'-'411-,P.,';':. .;••••'. ...,."'••••'..• ' •••••-•::: . .,':,.-..•;.::'•.,1.-g,',,p,f,:i,l,..k-:';,:',•..,•..-'',•'•:•'•••:••,••-•,•..-.!-:••••,,•:-.•'.•.,•:•-:;•:,z•.• ;:,;•.,..!,. ...:.... -••••:•-;..,•..',:••;••.•.-:•.••.:,...,;..'l•..';.‘o;'a,,,,-t,),•-'.,'.1...',..;,.•....•,•r.,1 ..f•.•••;..•...-,,.'...,,1.,.,..,,r;.•,,•-iN-.:..;,'.',J:.,,'••'•,.•.,....,..'.‘':.'.....•:..Y..•..,.1••Y,!,.*:!,•‘•,:•:.•-.•C.•...,•,•.,•':.,,.'...."7..•';'i',%••.:'...'•-.•:••':'•:•,-..•.t 41i.., ):,4.1:,.1',',•••• ,.'.••'.•..:.,,*',:,.'...',•,.,..'•.•:•'•,••,.'.:.'...,"•:•'"..‘.••',:.•..•...,:..1,......,,..,.........,••:f:,./-r...-.;.,.,.: -',.•.•••,.•. A j7 ::!,';'..!l;•*,..... -.•- 1 ‘*, :.:•• *:',•';',*,11,::'''IS'Y''''.,.•• *•:•.*:';•* ' ...*•', ,-,.;.-..,1:.',•.!.'.,).;.:1...,:.:.*.*;:.,.••••:.•,:,'*;.,',:.:''..2'':,•-.,'.•.!..','; '' . :...i,' 1'. *:'..,./r.i(i,,..'..,.•• '.*,','1;**'*:..•'1........;,'.;:11:*..j.:','.;.‘;.', :*,,i'...!,'•„''.•-'••,,:,iK)".P*‘4.4+. y'.:C*,**':** ',)•',':.,:,:*•';, ; ..!.1'''',''.,";..-:',',,.'''S,.';..'..';%'''i.1••.•••••.. .•...••••'*;,.*.•* "' ', s,,;Nt;1,•;*•4,4, ' ,' ''...,•,..:'' •:. * Alt••:•;!•,'.';,i'.•''.;',,'•••..:,'•' -,•".'-',".:' '':!,,-.i':'..- i.*.!•.j.:;',A' .;•,, : .,.., .....:-. ' ..;•:::;:....'•:,.,'. ... ' ' ''. :*;i.i•,'fZiii.. ' . ', ..';0,1;., ;,,:s:,..,..,.,' ..1"!. ,.1;•,',", .'','/,,,..,......!.•,•:::..,•„.•.•...... ,..y,,• .,., .,-,• .....:•,.:•,, . :.,!,..............•;.,........,.-,.:••. -..,.......:..•.;?..::,...,,, rif••,,..:•.; ',•' -: ..... .$..,,i„if::,'„,!•''.,, ••"•'..: •. ,!.,...;•.„‘.: ........:•........, . -,....; . '• .-'• i•,5,.,?4-, r,.,.. ,,../...,:?.....:..";.„:... -, :,'. 1.-.• .•.i.f.•; ..,,• :•',:, ...;A,1",,.' ,:::::.,....' - .,..!:•:-. .......,.• ..:';.•:::• .. :;":t....1'..,.. . -• '.'..,'*.,,•" ......;...1; . :f,.:'.'' - .....c.:.:.:.. .,:, . •:;',7,:il • .• : •Y:•:,';‘;'...;-.... : ,r ,-;•:.; • ';;-•'; '1•:-.f ,;• - ., .. ••:,,... ..:••.,.....:•,,.., !.:,',;.: ••.' •• •• • • ...;...- • -- :41:.' . * ?,1•:-11':,4,'. •22.;..•' ...',••••••';..; ,:- .1•••••••?.';;,/q",...','..1 .."''.1.• Of A.',•• , ,,,,,L:•,.•;.• '' :.*,, .•• .•, :•.c:::•;;;; ', ... • ; • 1.:I;F.41;,:••.:,k;',;,••;.;•.... ',.... ,..:, '.. , ' ...-;•;;;. • :,;:ii'illr;•'1.,:', ./...11 ‘;., ,•,• •• •.:';• ' ;,•";:.• . ;?;.":':: '.,' •,.:'; : "7"'"vir.VP':011/161ON • •••''''1.;•'•':".'1. •• -. .•4::'44f.4 •. 4 4.: ; '-,•••/; 4 4••••',• ..'. •.if.4." •-Vint::•-4.:' •:'•.,,'.:c . 4., ':: .• ::•••,-". • ,i,.'..1 ,.,:!:7 •,.... : '•• ..PrT.Y.OF EtENT ' . ' ' •:44.2i...::::-%.:. 'N\‘',0 ' .. ':•. .',, . ...• ;• ..?'',•,'• .••••," ;...:',0,)• ; • ,'., .... •....' .':. ..,..". ON. , -..'„.y..:,,i..... ' .• • . •r t••1:'''..;••• : - • ; •:... • •::.:. :.;':•-'-• : •: :1;AP; ..• .1:-...-••:.•'" .'•" .!....."•' ••.•-..'"•?;•.1.-`. . • ••••• . • .•. • •..' --,','., • .1.. . '':.•: ::::.'4', • • '.•1."V i..;:l'i.,.. .,.. :'.. •.:. .• '1,... .. ..... •-•.:• ...; ..1.), , . r.;.' • ....' i „•4' •.; . '':c• OCT q.' '• •• •; .• •' ••.•"$•:•i'••'•?•' • : • •;. •.:1-'.,'N''.•:.•• - ' ' ' ..: ••'-'.;. -•• i..i. • ! '• • ',.,a? •.'• - • '', •',. :.' ' '•- -• .•:.;,••;.,,I,•/,• • ',.•t''•••."' v• i' 4....:3.,loon,: ., •,;.,..„...4.;,•,,,,:,• . „.;.• .„ • ,.:„!...1.,v, i.00• •,y;.:,.....%-i..,• - . • ...,'...''',St;,•!.i••••-• --' • -.. ..' -; . •- :-. ..•. . It...,i,t,,••••..... .., ...,..„...,...• .,•:. ! . -..,-.., ••,.• ••:•••:•::..,A.4. . .,. . .. .. . ••• ;...: i. - •".•,•,?,t....i::,.$,: i - . •::,.•v,...",;,••• .", - .. •:•• . .. • ..,. : . ..,, ...id,. • • ....,,.: . • .?•-.....••, . ..,.".,"•,•,i,}•,,toi,.• . .•,•:. ,.ihtde •e#v•E.: - . ,•••1•10,,•,, ). . •;.„„...•:,,•.••••• • . . .•••:•,•q.,-,,,4••• . •• • •••,..;?...,,i, . - . . • "....,,••. :..,41.,. • : :, ,„ -•.,;.f••,a... • • • • ....• -. •-• , ., •f) • . .., .., • -. •. . . 1,.•••••,' • •••• ••-• :-.. - -, ..,._, •• . .:;:t,.;4•••• . 41 ., . ,•-...,,,,,•:-.. •„ ....i,...,,,,?., . ... .. - '• ..: ..... .,.-...- , • •. . • ,...•.y... • •• .'"`!t ••• : • ••••...• .. " '. .-.. ..• .: .'••••tv.•‘,,-... ..• . . . .. • .. ... -.,..:;.." . -.., -;-.,:',.. . • . :',.f.'.,g • . . . .„. .• • ... . • • -•Iiik.,r, •......' .-.• :,• .' .••••v•,-• • --. .,...,,. - •,t,,,,..,,,,, .. • •• ,- ,:e.',41. -.. ; ., •..• •-• •,,,; . . . ... *I-'g,.• ,'•,.k,' ' ' ,,k • 1' '''::. ..' '' .. •• .:. ".;`;),.:1,.. . . , ...,„ ....: . . . • _ .� • rug_ i w 4 CO • CROSS PARKING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 1988, by and between MONARCH MOTOR INNS, LTD., an Oregon general Partnership, the general partners of which are identified herein and shall he hereinafter collectively referred to as "Monarch", and BANYAN INVESTMENT GROUP, a Washington limited partnership, HERMAN M. ALLENBACH, managing partner (hereinafter referred to as "Banyan"), relating to the parking and landscaping and landscape maintenance of property within King County, Washington, more particularly set forth below; and WHEREAS, Banyan Investment Group is a Washington limited partnership; Herman M. Allenbach is its general manager (general partner). WHEREAS, Monarch Motor Inns, Ltd. is an Oregon general partnership, composed of Charles R. Kearns and Dixie L. Kearns, husband and wife; Larry L. Bassinger and Gloria Bassinger, husband and wife; and Philip l_e Gerstner and Clara D. Gerstner, husband and wife. WHEREAS, Banyan is the owner of real property in King County, Washington, legally described as follows: Lot 2 and 3 of Short Plat No. 014-81, Records of King County, Washington, and recorded under King County Auditor's number 8105209001, situated within the City of Renton, . King County, Washington (Lot 2 above described is herein referred to as "Lot 2" and Lot 3 hereof is herein referred to as "Lot 3." WHEREAS, Banyan is the lessee of Lot 2 above described under Lease recorded June 11, 1985, under King County Auditor's Recording number 8506110824 and Monarch' is lessor therein and has constructed a motel upon said real property, and WHEREAS, Lot 3 owned by Banyan is currently vacant; however, .Banyan anticipates that said Lot 3 will be developed in the reasonably near future, and WHEREAS, during the construction and development of Lot 2, approximately ten feet of Lot 3 was landscaped and paved as parking area,and WHEREAS, the parties desire to share the mutual benefits of a cross parking and landscape maintenance agreement, • NOW, THEREFORE, AGREE as follows: cfry MoN OCT 2 3 188g • °1 <15 -1- Monarch shall control and be responsible for the landscaping of the easement area, above referred, approximating the south ten feet of Lot 3 that is in current use by Lot 2. At such time as an occupancy permit is issued for the use of the tenant upon Lot 3, the Lessors or owners, as the case may be, having respective control of the use of said Lots 2 and 3 ,may enter into an agreement for the common maintenance of landscaping and/or parking or so much of either or both as they may decide. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, should the said parties fail to execute such an agreement in writing, upon the issuance of an occupancy permit upon Lot 3, each said party shall be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of their respective lot as jereomabpve ;ega;;u descrobed. and the parking and landscaping within same. • The parking areas of Lot 2 and Lot 3 shall he contiguous and shall allow ease of travel between them and ease in their common use. Banyan herein grants to Monarch an easement for the parking of cars of customers, clients, guests, residents, and other invitees on the parking spaces ofLot3. That Monarch herein grants to Banyan an easement for the parking of cars of customers, clients, guests, residents, and other invitees on the parking spaces of Lot 2. This easement encumbers the properties hereinabove described and shall run with the land, and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon successors and assigns. Herman Allenbach's signature hereinbelow is there set forth as Managing General Partner of Banyan Investment Group, a Washington limited partnership, as owner of Lot 2 and Lot 3, and as lessor of Lot 2; and Herman Allenbach warrants he has authority to execute this document for the purposes set forth herein. BA YAN INVEST -NT GRO P rm All nb • -2- C MONARCH MOTOR INNS, LTD. Charles R. Kearns Dixie L. Kearns Larry L. Bassinger Gloria Bassinger Philip L. Gerstner Clara D. Gerstner STATE OF WASHINGTON ) :ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of •, 1988, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared HERMAN M. ALLENBACH, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he signed and sealed said instrument as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, Residing at My commission expires • • -3- ff C \. • MONARCH MOTOR INNS, LTD. Charles R. Kearns Dixie L. Kearns Larry L. Bassinger Gloria Bassinger Philip L. Gerstner Clara D. Gerstner STATE OF WASHINGTON ) :ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 1988, before ..me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared HERMAN M. ALLENBACH, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he signed and sealed said instrument as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and seal hereto affixed the day and year : in this certificate first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, Residing at My commission expires -3- • STATE OF OREGON ) :ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 1988, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Oregon, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared PHILIP L. GERSTNER and CLARA D. GERSTNER, husband and wife, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they signed and sealed said instrument as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Oregon, Residing at My commission expires • • -5- C STATE OF OREGON ) :ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 1988, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Oregon, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared PHILIP L. GERSTNER and CLARA D. GERSTNER, husband and wife, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they signed and sealed said instrument as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate first above written. " • NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Oregon, Residing at My commission expires • • -5- " C,F R4, ECF: 4'40 k-v t$ •O z City of Renton Lu: " ��"g9 .330,9gT ��.� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST F0 SEPSe Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Sourdough Mining Company Restaurant 2. Name of applicant: Merrick Lentz Architect 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact-person: Craig Chaney 15446 Bel-Red Rd. , Ste. 410 Redmond, WA 98052 (206) 881-8117 4. Date checklist prepared: October 19, 1989 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Building & Zoning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction start: February, .1988 Construction completion: August, 1988 ouoNG DW►s10N ory of RRE TO ®CT ? 31° 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. - No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. All City of Renton permits for building, mechanical, electrical, fire sprinklers and other related information. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to ;I repeat those answers on this page. Construction of a 12 ,943 S.F. restaurant, including parking ., area improvements and required drainage. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand • the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, • site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Property is Lot 3 of Short Plat 014-81 , located in the 3700 Block of East Valley Road, north of the Nendels Vaw-Inn Motel, south of Shurgard Self-Storage, and between East Valley Road and State Route 167 , located in the south end of the City of Renton, one mile south of I-405. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); 41Egli rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 5%0 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. • Sandy gravel intermixed with clay and some organic III material; fines in excess of 5%. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No - 2 - I I� • 4) Will the pz—u1 sisal require surface water withdra..a.ls or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. A storm drainage system will be installed to direct the surface run-off water into the approved City storm water system. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None - the building will connect into the existing sanitary sewer. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Run-off from building and paved areas will be collected into a designed storm retention and drainage system, and transported to an approved City storm line. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No - 4 - • e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No filling will be required, with the exception of structural fill imported for the foundation. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Lot is flat. Erosion is not expected to occur. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 8 5% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Standard temporary erosion control measures will be implemented during construction as required. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some dust is likely to be generated during the construction process. Watering will be utilized to control the dust as required. Cooking aromas are likely when the restaurant is open. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None anticipated to be required. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No surface water body is present. A drainage channel runs from east to west across the property. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The drainage channel will be tight-lined as a part of the construction process. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None - 3 - b. ;4` i'' e. Describe the ,,Jrpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No filling will be required, with the exception of structural fil:_ imported for the foundation. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Lot is flat. Erosion is not expected to occur. 9. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 85% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Standard temporary erosion control measures will be implemented during construction as required. 2. AIR a. What types of •emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some dust is likely to be generated during the construction process. Watering will be utilized to control the dust as required. Cooking aromas are likely when the restaurant is open. • b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None anticipated to be required. 3. WATER a. Surface: ' 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? I? yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No surface water body is present. A drainage channel runs from east to west across the property. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The drainage channel will be tight-lined as a part of the construction process. IS p� 1/G1,v-La. " 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge materi� would d be 6`�dL� n or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area ofthed l site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None - 3 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: No measures beyond the tightline of the existing drainage channel are anticipated to be required. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other a Shrubs grass - wild only o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Site will be cleared and all vegetation removed from the area. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The site will be fully landscaped utilizing a variety of trees, grass and shrubs indiginous to the area. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other mice, insects Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not known, but not likely to be a disturbing use. - 5 - • d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, it any: No wildlife is endangered. Ground animals and insects , if present on the site at this time, will most likely relocated to surrounding unimproved land. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity - cooking, cooling, lighting Natural gas - cooking, heating b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. Project is designed within the allowed heights , and surrounding property is already improved. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Insulation per State requirements Hot water reclaimation HVAC economisers Energery efficient lighting and equipment 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Trash from the building will be contained in an enclosed trash area and transported by local garbage companies. Any garbage spills will be cleaned up by restaurant staff. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Medical, fire 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: No adverse effects are anticipated. b. Noise ,ill 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic - 6 - 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction-related noise between 7 :00am and 6 :00pm until the restaurant is ready for occupancy. No major noise problems are inherent with the operation of the restaurant. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: No requirements anticipated. 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant site with streets to the east and west, motel to the south, and mini-storage to the north. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not within the last 35 years. c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e.* What is the current zoning classification of the site? B1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. G No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 80 people will work at this restaurant, all shifts included. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None needed - 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Maximum height - 35 feet Principle exterior material - stained wood siding b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None anticipated 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Parking lot lighting, building illumination, neon signage, Lighting to be utilized between sunset and 2 :00am. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Exterior lighting will be designed and placed to avoid impact on any surrounding properties. - 8 - • 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Project will provide a meeting area, and will include some outside display areas for public use. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, . scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Refer to site plan Sheet Al of plan set, included with this application. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit,stop? Yes , within two blocks. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many-- would the project eliminate? 128 provided, none eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No - 9 - •U . e. Will the proybci use (or occur in the immediate iity of) water, rail, or K‘ air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 971 daily vehicle trips, heaviest at noon and 6 :00pm. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: To address the mitigation of existing traffic problems, the owner will contribute $24 ,073. 98 ($1 .86 per S.F. ) to the Transportation Assessment Program at the time of building occupancy and agree to participate in future L. I.D. ' s for valley transportation improvements. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Existing services appear to be sufficient without modification to service this new project. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None needed. 16. Utilities a. C' e u_' ' • currentl available at the site: electricity) atural 41, . - elephon.sanitary sewer tceptiry.sysn, o er ca le b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or • in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity - Puget Power Natural Gas - Washington Natural Gas Telephone - Pacific Northwest Bell Sewer & water - City of Renton C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be an 'llful mis eprnation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Craig haney �I - 10 - I #176 11,18-84 CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN • * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* PROJECT TITLE: ,Arnu.silf m►n► n �a• t��S APPLICANT: Mcw►ck. `t2 / kte APPLICATION NUMBER: cSP - 111,2 The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A. notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. • ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER NURt b OF-R+ 112br i ivaWp, ctiz • -o*-R1 e ' BRA., - ,Orrrlcol. `t`rt-E, °I is 04 �AN�oN 11Jv66-m -r jol& 'W. 144V 20, 6-12cvp r, or-ri-c , ge v,t `n-IE 1' 6TArugPxrr l��.0 220 �1'• �InJ . - qo$2. Mbok rL P4 - 1S :IAt , wP- • GI 1'612K O. loll Wt�.Jr6R1.j Jr. 12 0014o rto -1w • . -r-r(,% WA et. loaf PuiNNa eny D��bN OF RENTON OCT 2 3 1989 ill ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER II ll CERTIFICATION 1. I.OM-& 041je.liereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the State �4fi�W 'St yrag);on residing at ( �� r� the o day of (r)c-k-o be f` i o,••` ,c: a r� C u-spES�N r- a NOTARY a—n �1 `'' PUBLIC SIGNED• 11-1-91 ' CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I. Sar��k• Se,eite. hereby certify tat notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on to '2.� 8' to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the St to of Washington residing at on the ,(o day of 9 SIGNED: S,a.►-,Arek_(C•Sc, ll II FORM MS