Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA97-031 ' . $ f x 47 .. '.)-5 "I ,, \'' r .5-., •\`) i:- I kl 1 . • , . • -,r uo. 1 '. pr) • . (\ , , ‘ _\jc:1•• f'615:1' !II (I) 11 '`,„'a 19;2 . . , . • .. . Cri . .. . . . • • ' . • . : It 4 3, 0 i • .......,,,;:eib' ,II rrorc°38„1. 19.P.3307 .,ii•i * • - 0.01 • Z . ...1/0."-*:- ,\ 92 1----z--- . • ., • . c) i ...7 a ..- • -,,,, .......,..,- . ,..-o• - , 331.42 I -I 0 4 . • ' . ... .• . . • IP's):13 '.13'5'..2 9 1311-. 13 1 .1 F 4„...r.f„.S.'''...• ......:/ ....:.> ..•-• , . . , 1,••••: , II , . . . ....• , , f:n - . •:. II CENAL 11 . 1 .. ), . . • c . a) 0 1 .... • .AG. 4 .•, '..UrlA ffIlil 2? iii; 92 ,60 IA I , 1.1J 3•;- - • . E •u) _..• • • a) . II 6 C) • 6 .::: 1 (9:1 \\ \\ • . - . • (-) 1.,--82---r-85.29- ----- ..... 1 , \ \ 1111038 \\ .., . , --I65.Z9- -.135.5 21 1 1 • 1 HIGHLAN,6 PLAZA I 1 ..... , . ........, . . . o) . II 110 25 ' ••• ' '•• '.. _....> •,' ' 1_1 1 . . _ . • • - -i3 ••• o.-io •c_ 0.51 Ac.g ..- LLI i • I • . to •"sa• 56.39 I 13.49 1 192.26 . --:, - 205.80 15.14 6 • . . • . (I) 3 • i6s.29 • . 155.5 . ..... "3 • • • •n i5o • , 150.53 150. 1.1.1 ',--• - i. •=. •1 'g r3 r-: 5 0 tl,„9 ril 0 31455 I-- 11 ‘73 1‘ g:_.4 t 'l r'• I • t. ... II- t- .. • 61°5 6 •• . it @ 0 e• . • IX I P•1- --I ' . .. • . • I- I? 0 193.05 .2130 t:,,,,,f _j : • . C.) 246.68 ?.,•_L to:14 *".1 162.41 t:`,/ 'CI • . 11 . re ,,,D • ,9- z, 314.04 ____ czt 5 is i 15 . • . • . ' 15 // . - • il- • @ 10 _NJ; 2 , isses , 14310 0 • (2) (3) : (3) , (4) 0 . . • • 0 1, • g 1:.:1 60 -5") S.13. 331-79 S.R '330-79 . 329.131: . II' • • • . • .. 14510.4j4A1 T. ..... Li -c.---- 2...,'I... .... -.411§L-.. • -64'513-Ea)e-lig-el: . •-• 2.. ___. kl F. • I 9T hi_ "__... . I • 47-6:-.-ii...M-•-•:i.TTIRL ir---na,„....' ==-14ff463 Z i'l .='• c-IBI• c -roy...- as. = c= c .--Z13i.63-- ,?, -E•-• t • 0 .t, . i- il:_-__"77,rt rii- •"71\-211.4S•-L-1-N-E--!;S'..i-7------ • - - - -. ....,,. , . 329. •••••_ _ _..,• ..• , 1 ,6 _ ±e-M.ST. P. & P 631.0131 TRANS LN. ESMT. James W. Hazen' I\ I - I 0 1 01'A W.T. Sinc3letOn .9, L514:211 . p,• 1 i. 52 132 AG. e 4 . ‘ Li • -- • , _1 1 I r ...1 , : .:-..... - ... i .---- . , .. : - : •• • ks :•: • ______ . _ ..1 ---- •••• ,.o UNITS 7 II r, Cp 0.91 Ac, re! I , ... ,.----------...- • 3,1 r ti ..... 0 r- 11 i it iviCLomos J mai pAcY 1),/,,r a° 0.65 Ac.. 73,, . 6 6 1 ... ... _ 32.1.23 -C:-/C) 4. 4, 1 • L .. ... • 1 1 757z. SUBJECT SITE t. f- --I • It _,)13° 257.23 - - -_. . • + t .11 j 1 :•-• i,j •. , I 1 1 1 1 tYilv 1 :: . ames W. Hozen , i H.F. Seideman F.. . i, School Dist.403 -- Itim i .:-., • 0% 1 S ,,- ‘, ik 1 • u • 1.49 AcE-35 0-)4'Ilui g M3 . 1- f -_ I II -i 1> .; .;:i i• 4_ i• \I 1- 100 1011 . @I II< 1311.- • 1°3 • 4 u„ .,. x . S _ 7 8 ,, i• , Et, 1 : ,, .-c- 2 lz; vAti• lik 1 611- 03 \ .„ . . 14.. . = Milored W. Miles 0 m 2.54 Ac. 6 __ \ E .3 0 fn I A c el 1 0 17_,2156 . ‘ 0 a •• . 0 . 9;,,' • ii60-1 i i • '(ii) II.---1 186 83 0 ie4.41 ___, • 3 L.LI b 328.83 1 30 256:F• • ••S. :: ••• •• II 180 • . 0 II ,,,.... v")...,•\ **" 0.45 " • // . \ -...• \\ al I 6 0 R 10 1\ . \% • .• .• r% ; 1. ,, Jake A. Palmer %..c .t.i ' •.: t I •. I / :,....• . . 1 1 i2/4 W ELI le Zo. 180 1,41 AC. 111B I 0 a : 1 .•••• ii 4 ,1/4-... lIct i• ,-12 • 1 cr'. 1 1 I 1 ' • 1tt w II • CC (-,1 1 • •-•1 1 1 I .4 0 • I II 32E1.63 I 12.8 ' ,.07 a. 11 : ; COMMUNITY 0 4C1 >44 1E312 II ,--,,-•-••••••••••••0'1; c0 IIC • I I I I I 1 aRCH 1.91 A c. 01 0 st • ° .2 1 CO ;I til • 1_, 1Iiir ang •„) 0.; 1, ...,- .-,,,,, :11 Johnnie I-.::::614:51.: i•17 I I I I • . • 11 0 • I I llo _ .1 1,01 At, e ,, ,t, ,1 holt il -0 ii• I t •,-... t., B28.43 ' t 0.51 AG. (121 z 165e IA , 1 Lloyd A.Ron9 „ Ilz -; : I Ac. 300.1 '-',11 1.29 Ac. i' r... i.jaucle •35.,:u .90,1.icy ios 14'. 1 I .... • 1 , I, 1, \, /iII ' 11 i 2 .. \ LI 4.) •,0 \‘‘,...c 15rt1 .,,i.lit. . : iict (1) I NO, „... e , • °4 I- 1 41Z5- V I co p , GarbisoRid9le'i Lu I I 0 - _ Nevin v41 . ›. \\ ! • 1 i 1 1 il ci .164.0z C> 164.01 __________.- 2.25 C. II 09 AG. ct II C.• IOTH ir::* , Ale cilsell, • Z s • la A it . Z8' .3 1-2-------------C: 37. D. S S (NE 73 C) ...... ...\\---------:---cl IZI ett 1 %ii t!1.1. @II li ts 6.03 116114 C541? . • $Qii • 1 \\ 328.03 - S.ET7"*. • . .07) Go - • 1137 800 , . . . • . f,S. •. . . . •. • . •• . • ' -• , 0 _ - ., fr s •1,M -,tn t•''1,•ft k.,,.;, , • . .8 7E::r:rCi--il:--. l<11 le-.6 --r:1 .+71:711L7E.S..1......T.:..S.''''''.......;"?.:?:•...:8•':;:::'::.'.' . - -... . - . ..• • , ...,.... . • • • ..•,. . ,.....,..-•:,.•••i, ...,,,.,...:., ......--- , • ____-•- „,-.-,„ % .: ... . i' ... '• .E.A.I I 1...v.:i'f'' r--,A 5'11(71'.:-'r.:‘ •..: . i:'•:-:-'''''''" - ',2,:i...;..;'.:.*;!::,•.'1•::-..L.-..--S.'•'...s.,:::'.;;:'•ni....-.60 M•PANX•; I. • ..1'MA?''C.O.NWAN:-.1 - tgi%'(•.-.:-.‘i.:0 ':::'-'.' - • ... ....L.1-41:1,1t4-.. ‘'.'. ... .. 0 . ....'',.‘,; ••?..:?,,...;.7,......::', .?c<R: kkr,.. : ittir:1(RP ` ' .. •.•• .CPF).• • • - • •• • ..... .L.E.'GEt4. .. .... ,.. . .: . .... timutom:0 . .. ... ... 1......1 ..., . •;tf...:,:.-.-••• •:.,., .111,,1;:i,;?..0 .f. .. ..... 0A.1.-L • • •• • ...,:.••-•-•:-,--r-,__3..... But ...0114•G ilig....,...;•••.%1•. ... North , . . . " • - vto.u.. . • •• .. • ... : • . pAyING••• .,04. i%„...t.iff.0. . . •., ..:--,-.8 .: •• .. :"... • : • . . "d D etail Ma? . . . s Fyi ER .:'••.x .t..01 146' •'•• . GOinill 1"•A • N . hboril°" eig - . • , . • • . . . • -• -- - .• . . 15 0 ,s, tiN (1 -,7,...„ cit. . • .0 -,,--• . • c- (c) ,...., vt,. .' 1-r. . . r•-- 1.0, o ilk -1.‘ ..., • -j)---4 Ti:7 t..1 • .-707 * 0 " • "Z•1.... . . 2 . 0 • . " • -,--, • b < ti�AavO ._\�i%' Yd_5 _ _ O c I a. JQ �i 1 1 1 �£ -___ r�•. 3 ' ,. ,9'32 t�`u 1 Q -' Hf w 6 Pu¢7.707.. .. )N.:t s, CENTRAL j w I r of as e' Z • Z J Q-®I.4.__o „,_. HIGHLANDS PLAZA 1• W ',. Q o oA. os Aca a; > 7 ? 20 W p ; t'w ,e" A r�• u nrsf 0 ulrli ii_" N t "" a to ro®®co no { J3— a w a .a; (21 (!I (3) a la) r O _ �. �® S.v aao-w9 .. - lxaut © gi® �a rs ' .'''e AJ,S+�-w ieG .3&" :-• 31J`=-_I'l_41_ T"6F N.'.a.y-= PiiHS.�N1E C' T _—"—r-�` .�_.—at\=� _ ��James;Moon �' 043,,I c"rl'�iA------'--T� p9 w.T.5N,gleten 8 IH ti`. eI i UNITS� 6� I.51®:: 1 1]3 AG I a 20 ti,N1 py ._LI ® RSA' Hd'�` .I `-- "� ^1 a �n'�J®I @"o65Ae®p � J acre '! 1 aiJe e,w.xo l seidemon t i school ols1.44e i; .__ N` ,re. r- 3 W N;lored 04 l w.xll, na vy6ll®Y In te.0 1�®• ie/{,' -e efly e s �a�S s• .2 i A45•�o. >• to i4 1 Joke A.Palmer d �� 7 \\.i 1@"W 11�. 1.41 Au ® I � e I! ,' Er...� i " _.. Il-q a it M III yak{� LrZen5: 3w WAL", l I.O sAc. ®� ANen n"It N 1 _ a II 3 IIg. 2 Johnnie L.Bro,4Csa 191 Ac i15. Lloyd 9 i .I r. I� L"�r a "7 u4ss 196 e E - I I 2 Claudel A6.ucha d p91AG �I, A. 6 iie j. Q A.Nerin {@{, Wry gidgley Pc o 11iin I`' -—1I MT Kg. 2 a."Ac. Ly° I.i v r� u g(d 6 9Ae 5> • li `\_: ,,, Edward H.Klein 1.96Ac. IMwic -w0� ®1� � � lie wow Q w.A�� MP NAM e.Nto9A _ .wum ole.• ..._,; lad- " T'`T•:{..Y.. ,���R;:' i.iA.;.or wa.l' O_ :..— _. ..:L. �Jj=.a{e.,4{ 4.1n' c' I. - CA CN4 PLAR PUICOS '� WC A.0.010.0 fxv. C4 w4RO(D) ^I P.. .S MCI. MY . 1 ROOK p0 =OIM � ►*6 M A Am N , l � AWOL APPurRLT fie LVP9i mi.SCAM PT F74S1RC AMID Ain Mf°R7+I SOCIETY FOR . M MGM be WOWS 5808 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. NIG AN[TPLV4 WE Ma No.a I.vioKoao ROD R. CENTOI WE 400 NOW. ICRDONOL RA MUM a0.6 WARIER g an an RDO "T ' S m"S4 t "4OLTT ticSOCO S KLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 M�swan INC w CaoWXTRE NO sbr m 206-803-3222 at auc 61. Wu, aA CLEAR SPEC. SPECWCMO CONC. COIOTETE La .64 R. SO sa RE • CONK. Ca61.L101 .I. Nat SS STA..ESS DELL • CENT. WawcuS 900 0f01eMTDI OIL STEEL Q RE1,504 • - Ca COVMIr .60E P6LIATOI STA1C SIRUCIUY. M. NTEAKR SusP. SLISPEFO D _ • 06L Com! it SCR Van O+ CET TOTE ..- _OIL. DWETTR Cm 0.06OI US(5) AOL•nI5) Tau 11410.24 neeTNILo (0--, DMA.RaIIfDLT _ __ -_ • - 0N CONN Na wtw. T.O.C. TOP a COOSIE `C�' on.COL Okla 601 IECNAItAL Tax TOP OF WORT e D.a °RING Im 14�K TS TUN STEEL ELPR1gN RO0IUICE WA. IA4IKIACIIAIDI Cr. MCA C UST 2IfR HAWSERcox V� V.dY diDi TA DEV UEMIbI INSC .E404 'RN 41 M[O6 u. O6UR1em15 u6 I-1 .M _ �® E3ECT. Maw LINO I,AIEE4 No1m __ .._ _ - -- .. .— �� Ea Carl Lela 0[ U. CaAP4ETrt M NORM G•. C,O4 we IA NOT A Tuca9 E w HEN Han SELDO4 _ _ _ U. DOSTNO NC IIOT M comma 41 VML 4 REFERENCE _ _ Br. Allir mar m. m°e°n Nrs Nor TO su4E - - - • MT —-- -' - -- - - M. num O.C. a1 CRIER V Rn _ - Font FUJORESOM 00 011TSOC WATER 1f1• •.00• RN ROOK OPa OP •/0 bow _ _ -.... _ __ _ • ® �� rt, FORT OPP OPPOyTC ■P. [4IR.c IONf - —® ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS SITE NAME ®.IQT.4•.R;- (RON 6c DIRECTORS:REOsr.,zu • � FROII Mama PROCEED SOUTH ON h405 TO TIE NUE SC BUUILVMO EXIT. • PROCEED EAST ON SUNSET BOULEVARD TO 13en AYENUC SE. TURN MIT(SOUTH)DH TO 138thSC AYEMIE SE AND PROCEED TO ,Im SWEET. HIGHLANDS / HAZE N TURN LEFT ONTO NE 12th STREET MG PROC®TO EIIO Of COL-OE-SAC rum'RCM ONTO THE swtl ACCESS ROAD. RTLGE ou0 I • 7F/1297 201M6 NEVER SET . • _ - SITE NUMBER 57 Z01-� * • WA0111-2 C 19' . AllihI NE 1 TN STREET R1IS06 II /—a/JER N.WEN MS - n out NE 10TH RE I g • SI 01 PROJECT LOGTKN /�� VICINITY MAP . -. e I • CV • MUM; Met O • LNDOILWwG Mai 0Q'A/E0E # f10CT /NAM E.FREES SFELT DQ�110E I1111I LD THE NORTH 275 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF P8 CIS.NC PS. cTE NI.ISP 1601 CMA.S AMEMIE NE 1 NI >M.IRE O or THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER M - REINON,RA 98056 • THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HEREBY APPROVE AND ACCEPT e3 S.KM STREET.Suit 106 w4111-2 SECTION TO.TOw5516P 23 NORTH.RANCE 5 FAST.WLLIANETTE PIONS (206)23s-01M THESE DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZE THE CONTRACTOR TO CD NEROWI,N KING COUNTY.WASHINGTON: T4A9.I.TaN 9e1a S� FAX: r_, SIR[U.m PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBED HEREIN. —. EXCEPT THE WEST 42 FEET THEREOF CON/EYED TO KING 11224 13en AVENUE SE CCNTA' �'ROBERT E.PROS TEL Io6 cn-TIaT ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW CCUNTY FOR 138TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST BY DEED RECORDED FAX: 206-622-2652 RENraN wASI.IcraN 98056 BY THE LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ANY CHANGES HIOHLAND$/HAZEN UNDER RECORDING IAFLIBER 63e)727. !I MST(1pFRAT(TF7• • �-I >m wAa tax�Im cn • CONTACT:PETER BOCEK eP�LP�4FFI )4PPTTHCWS 5 RFPRFSFTIIAIIVF OR NODIFlCATIONS THEY MAY IMPOSE. • • OFECOL 4 CORPORATOR NA WTTHEYS 1.CO CO.PC. tn A OELA.URE CORP_OOR NEM CONY. C/0 NEYTEL C°BNCTON ON0 r,p silt K{ SeOe TAKE wA52.2Ci0N BU9. SeOe LAKE wASI.NCTON BUA i oIo.KI NUR Ina ma • O IttELSEAMES SLATE 403 SUITE 400 A-I on scam IMAM,NIC 71 • KNKLMO,0A9.C1LN 98333 KIO UND.WASHAGTON 9e033 • • C*7 HuaiC.COL09EM ES k ASSOCIATE.NC. MOPE: (206)003-3222 PHONE (206)P03,8774 442 umn.cL6.6.was - - WAOtt1-2 O 1215 I14M AKIRA SE - - ' A �9e4 MUMCCRPOUTON PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT.OPERATE M:U YNNUN AN • - . • TO, 206-162-10e0 UNOCCUPIED.MINCED SPECt41ZED IgBlE RIDE( )LOLEK1NKi1TON5 I CV FAT: 206-I67-7719 F7aUTT. THE FAUX(w 16 OF C067 A PREFABRICATED C"UPNEHT SMELTER. r SITE ASS I a-T (APPfOX 220 S0 FT).6TALLED ON A SUB ON GRADE FOR0UON,be A L_I nTa.aces.worm pub maownR .`-,, CONTACT:GERALD REED �RJI�A,ATONG. nE EwvPNENTT0 SUPPORT ARTEMIS e1AL �GTRICAL, •_— -11224 138th AVENUE SE Q AAO PO.ER EOm+EK LANDLORD/OWNER DATE 3 SOT ffiffI E QIME - RENTON, WA 98056 E/ COY OF RENTON RW RATER OR SEWAGE - USA. • BEG1ffiaLI EB -4 1 WET TOLE 4 19a0 E]Ei60M PLACE SURE suTE Too• • To23mEIS CORSULING DOWERS �t 1MEElt b • SETELE WA-284 MIMES �� ELEMCA/LARDY: PUGET PAPER AND UOTT • TITLE SH J TEL 206-264-11e1 EFL•(eoo)151-4123 2 FAX 206-2e4-1236 NEXTEL DATE 1 TELEPHONE un2rr: us.WEST L3_1 • CIDRACT:VICE GE 1A NEROE TEL(600)819-4357 Z • FIRE F COMMENT: PD2r0N FIRE DEPT. • CDTEL206 235-2643A' �' - i ADA C01/IrIICE: 9Q11E1t2 ° $61t • • CD • NAoUn 6 um.4.6.o cm Na N Na b... 6.6b.• •�JI z • 1 r • LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONSULTANT TEAM ' _ �— —PROJECT SUMMARY . SHEET INDEX APPROVALS T-1 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING ' CITY OF RENTnNr - X P{ Na saw I:I ----11 { NEXT ��*rowes 5608 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. N.1/4 • sEC.10-23 SUITE #410 ELN IT Iii.i • f110 I-• : ,r r - IQRICLANO• WASHINGTON 98033 . 4 o I W �/ 97 $iii.i 206-803-3222 • t• yF 'I6.•lC ,a • __- w - ' r. Q` ,!Z �t123 a » ; s A _ __ _ _ __ __ - —__ _- - _- _---- • N,1/t CORNER SEC 10-73-5 I f`.M 7-` M0 CONC.NON.n/3'BROS �)C/ 9/39 97 GYUOE I F NCE� AREA ..,.a.� .wi -.a.. EXI- NC OYIE- F X—X X1 ... .............. 339.63 X . ... 12J FT HIGH .n..-i` N 8612'1(f W K.C. MEU7Z644,72 GRID 2677.73 MEAS. 3 1 I n`ira<.. 4 ] N 88'39'OS W 263)7.03) (R.0.5. - SEE NOTE 3)�._J- ( _ 42 _ = = -' - _ =`�._�..`�'.+r• to --------- --- — --'- t uoN../3 eRAss 11 `_ i I r_. I ao. ����9y�� I I K , ill .•_-. NE CORNER SEC. 10- -s(p0R9iEl'S) 1 .X % .".%,�v'.• R -X i W o I :� I jI N % ,., �1 _ X �. n //7 NUB!TACN LLf X— I j j i W SED LEASE �: -S'LY • t Gv 1 A•. �. GTE IssuE N ::39 w` u p atE seT REV.St NAME IN VICINITYINI C. Z -V D i La" �' I4 gaga/iW SWl1 TREES IN MISC. illiSt RS Z .,, I 4 .... - •34 ' axc.� i © *CO SET LEASE CORNE Q I La _.nir u �•+ x I EMI IIn OSED TOWER •ZaW I U I= I r1^M vT C • � .00 a 1••aa •r,)O 1 4 IFi a l m I¢ QS,,a. N i N 1 ,r•'%^�i^ 3 N .:39'Os W X y��.j' ,ri C' n 'O Ttr xQja ¢4 c i' 'VOI =1.m-•. H I �M1 4��0 •if, X>; ii iWi r Y •,na, f.7,.`,t+F7+a: J W W - rr. x S s9'M• ..4.,,y....,...: . I, Ist• r _ . �:A,., z i X '....4/....., JP i.i.: 41 . 4.. _ ANTENNA/TOWER LOCATION ,••,., F ;; `•`��y't'O"'`P`•-ryt'f 1 1 GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES .• 3 t� iii N.. 1 NA027 N 4T30'09.55 ^ ................................................ W 12709'I6.1- .•• - ..... x I NAD83 N 4T3O'08.9t' x W 12709'20.59 •...a •,•�, eirf 91a_ __�_______________________� _-�__ II N ::39'0 W 287.28 N Ba20'04" W 2611.so (RA.S. - SEE NOTE 3) FND CONC. MOH. ...� .�S Hugh G. Goldsmith / 1/4 COPPER PIN 0.6• BELOW GRADE. .... Q� Associates, Inc. IN USE.VISITED 1/29/9 .mi 194 11 W M..•16 . .. HIM•.•••►949N • THIS YAP REPRESENTS AN ELECTRONIC DATA FILE DEVELOPED BY HUGH G. • - MM'•�14 91N99 GOLDSMITH et-ASSOCIATES,INC. GOLDSMITH HOLDS A HARDCOPY too �� NOTE: ��whoa-mg 96:MO 4■-1990 • REPRESENTATION OF THIS FILE AND THAT H FILE IS Y IS THE ORIGINAL.ANY 20 /o AVERAGE MAX. TREE HEIGHT • = 78 * CHANGE TO THE DATA CONTAINED IN THIS U IS CONSIDERED UNAUTHO 0 • • UNLESS REVIEWED BY THE UNDERSIGNED SURVEYOR. ANY REUSE OR 30 70 I ::: ............... 1' = 30' ADAPTATION UNDERSIGNED FSURVEYOR FORASUFf/$IIITYR'S RISK UNLESS REVIEWED BY SCALE 0 100 400 E00 1200 t600 • - .. ■ ■ II : D SITE PLAN • 9UUE: 1' 400' S SURVEY — ENLARGE SURVEY — OVERALL SITE PLAN HIGHLANDS — HAZEN • (A1AP SOURCE - THOMAS GUIDE: PAGE 626, VICINITY MAP - NO SCALE UNDERLYING PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROJECT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEE DATA � - 1• HORIZONTAL OATUY: HAD B3/91 - WASHINGTON STATE �? - PLANE. NORTH 2ONE. WA� 4002'LZ-2 THE NORTH 275 FEET OFER THE YTEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF HIGHLANDS / HAZEN SITE OF POSITION: NORTH (WARIER CORNER SECTION 1 THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST ST QUARTER IN 2' 1&pIS OF PHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 E/LST,.N•M•AS SECTION 10,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,WILIJWETTE THANORTHWESTT PORTION OF THE QUARTER OF SECTIONR1 TO OWNOSH 23 NORTH, REPRESENTED BY MONUMENT DESCRIBED HEREON. I SITE ADDRESS m EXCEPT T IN KING COUNTY, THEREWASHINGTON: 1 _ EXCEPT THE WEST 42 FEET THEREOF CDNVEYED TO KING RANGES E . W.M, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS 3 BJ55 OF BEARINGS: SUBDIVISION OF THE NORTHWEST COUNTY FOR 138TN AVENUE SOUTHEAST BY DEED RECORDED FOLLOWSECINNIOJG AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID QUARTER of SND SECTION 10 AS DEPICTED ON THE 5R /"� \ 11224 138th AVENUE S.E. lf7 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 6387727. RECORD OF SURVEY. RECORDED IN VOLUME 104 OF i -\ SUBDIVISION: Et e''1D'- WASHINGTON NUE THENCE N 8879'03' W ALONG THE NORTH LINE SURVEYS, PAGE 11 (RECORDING NO. 9506009001), / RENTON, 1--- THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 329.63 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. /� 1 `\ -� USA di CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF SAID 1� SUBDIVISION:THE4. VERTICAL DATUM: NAVO 88 UNDERLYING PROPERTY r __ n THENCE SN 89' 5 1 W ALONG THE EASE UNE OF STUD KING COUNTY SURVEY CONTROL POINT -- C7) WEST HALF OF SAID EAST HALF A DISTANCE OF 174.68 FEET: 5. BENCHMARK: AKA NORTHEAST CORNER SECTION 10. - __— \ THENCE N 89'S5'0 W AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID FAST #RENT1845 ( W.M. AS DEPICTED • A DISTANCE OF 61.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST, ) sE tiln StRaT�`I -•yew{ LEI UNE '+^ —• i f+' BEGINNING: 131113 HEREON. 467 76 ' 1 �p 1�9s \ THENCE N 8839'44 W A DI DISTANCE OF 45.00 FEET: ELEVATION <I I� �. A Y� TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Cr) THENCE N 0004.44' E A DISTANCE OF 45.00 FEET: i iO O THENCE S BB'39'03- E A DISTANCE OF 45.00 FEET: 6 YONUMENTATION SHOWN HEREON WAS HELD VISITED AS :, s� THENCE S OQpt•N W A DISTANCE OF 45.00 FEET TO NOTED. IR ' I g ot. V THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. HEREON HAVE USED FOR < O 7 TREE ISSUES ADDRESSED ' X SITUATED IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND REFERENCE CHIGGO TREE INSURANCE CO. A.LTA I I 1 (13 CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.05 ACRES. COMMITMENT ORDER NO. 472842. L---- J—I— --� q _ ' O GG P O B. SPECIAL EXCEPTION NO. 1 FROM' REPORT ��.,'�LG. -w`��J '; = MENTIONED ABOVE (TRANSMISSION UNE EASEMENT) DOES '=,.�G`�v� l Q7 NOT DISCLOSE A WIDTH FOR SAID EASEMENT. KING •�J- / O•::: COUNtt MAPS. HOWEVER•SHOW A 40' EASEMENT WIDTH - : a) AND TH5 ALONG WITH THE DESCRIBED CENTERLINE HAS W O BEEN DEPICTED HEREON. ' O — . - — All' I" -. T II al I _ . AfErem. . . 1 . .1. -, - . . I . . COSMO UTILITY POLE 5808 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. KSUIRITKELAN/400.0 &purr OF UNDERGROUPA3 POWER ANO TELCO COSTNG UTIUTY POLE • • -',..........,.......... . WASHINGTON 98033 ROUTE OF UOIDER010.110 POWER AND TELCO '''''',.„,,,..., \ 206-803-3222 7 ..•••• 4171 \...,,,N •. . . 1 • \ ; / . . s , . _ N.E.Ilth srmir _• I / i 1 . ` I g . EDGE OF FV510101T—N, 1 al / coma auxic PAIN I • EDGE Or PAVEMENT I g • • —N. / - D2STLING INUONG PATH • _ \-/-1--..-__ _, 1, \\ ---71- - -''I- -- • - - - ....----. ....—......... .-... ..- ,-- .---- --,...22122ETUT.1.11L.I1JELISF.T-T1-7.14:6Z.= --,, ,&--------:_.--_7=7.--7-. L,, . -''`•'7. - -— I \4 . 7 ____________ __ •,_pRoFvar um( N 8163993-W 28. 1''''''-----"z------------------r: f r 1 EXISTENG EA9NEW \ \ •- \ \ ,. , • \ \07-6 SETBAITX • \s r ..7 __—a.. •,... ... ... .. \ \ . ____ .--2.---......„:„..„„ ,..,, -r , 015111•C - 7-----________:r I • r I 1 DEMO EASEMENT \ • \ '. , ' • . •, \ \ • \ :1; 3.. \ \ amm:7- --!Z----1: , 1 1 / ... 1 l'..-..1' COSTING WENDT • . \----- \\ . ' •. •, •, . • \‘. • • . , " • . V - I I / 1. /I 1 I DISING EASLIENT \`.......,.N \ . • • ' •. '. • • • \ ' ..., c g 1 ,, ., • ETISTNG EASEME10 • . • 3../. I / A i -"I- --/44-6`..--..1-...'-I EXSINGIPSEMENT .• i •'..-3. -4-'• '4 1" r.. —,— ,..... ... , • ys, ........... ____,._.___7,__,_ .............. -- • • ,-‘ ..c, .•\--,, •....,‘ ". / I .............. .............. • , -,- I. ./ • • ''- •• %, i'.. I 1 ,..-5-t b 1 ------/,--- . ... . 34.-st J X\ tY '•-cr's / ' . 61 • ".- , PROPOSED 17 • `1 . XCESS ROAD 1 • •43—. .. •'' ACCESS ROTO ii!.:':!•;i ., ii ETISTNG • • TELECOM/ i $.: COSTNG 1 1 • r / • TELECOM.: ARC/MC=0•TwtooTT, 7.g., ,, ' ' I I . SOX SEAT= COIONO-8•11 M0110-11411 \ -i/, .' :--', ,/ /.,'Y::- / / I r\ . ‘ I • S. ' / ./ / ! • • .--:., \ 1 •. ' r — . I \......___ .., / — --......._..--" /;'; // / / / • :17) i . . 2:3 I/ b : . ___ ..: . v mExasTpatTREEs To . 1 ' •. / . .., / - - ,- , • :-.,,.. . a ,• ..:.• . • soma • ., , / . ,-• / . / --,•, \Dzioaao Knave ... ‘, • ,- , ____, . tras-cayosnloup.s...m.aori.rx, I I ., . • • / , • COUP.WELTER I OTX , , • . . ,' , ., - 301C6TVIG 16315* T• ' VOSING 10•15* •' 1• 7FEB97 MING MEW SET \PARCEL i 102305-9061709 / / ;^ • • . ____, .• •.SHELTER-Er, : / •. / ,/ ' ''s • _____. SWR97 MING SET • , •.. \ "••••-_., / i / / / . _ . I- Z' / \ Ir 45.-6 ...---" 4, 61.-o" / • \ / / // 5 .t• • • 45•-o• ,,..._.„-----' j, 61.-6 . ' T2 j\i i'it ' - i / c .1 5... /LEASE UNE I i f . _11,13 1 0 • 4/ Ill' I \ • ---------------- I/ , " / /ill i • .../ • 1 3 \ , 7"--. .:.E I :IA 12 ' •,,,, lik 7 a •! . • i • --------------; ' ,11. ..a DZYNG TREE 10131 ,. 1/ BE RE11049. .gl ; • z: ..'- b./ 7) , .1 --(/ .•—a i • -. a •a MOM ID. WC •. I \.,..."/".- I • / lEasTo REiDet0 4_REMAJ _ Ps \-) 1 Illy.!_:ini':iniii,:ii, ! / \ \ •• • 1\ .1 - %.,,:.:,::::::::::•.,::: • \ ,r,r / r-\._../ UMIESS 01NEWITISE room& • 7 V - 1.51 : CCISTBAYTREES ro&rvartr- \ \r\ SEE TRU PLAN NUS SM. / / ile , . T''.- .:•:,:-:,:•:,.:•:•:......:, T i/ .., ......m......NWA •'-\..../ UNUTSS OTHERWISE„NOTED: / V--/ FOR ACOITOWL,WORMA701 LEASE UNE,/ / r ; ..e's./.,,„... .,.. ._ ______ =-- / .....,,.. . %1 , .----- . . / • 1 1' .La' 151.-63 • •••••/ f`• ....,....., / nun woe I . isf•-cs •' ,„, ._. ,• • / •• 7 • •----,. tr,o't .1. PROJECT LOCUM ., .,,,,, '••• 1.---- 1 / / ,&& / I / . ..../ TH,s/sEE Ead.mowsKELNE/puvi / ..... / Exfoois-swo•----------- ir_. ..., / ,..•• . GRAVEL' I `. .' .::•• -- -------------- & ---•• 7 C/Rtzr4 // / =NW 96.13 COSINC RESGOCE•-•\ ' EXSTNG IREE TO 1 • /''' .,..------'' /..= ii / `I - : .••• BE R0164.1). ./ j s.I 71 / 7.' 7 i SM INIC i - / . .• . / / I . ' . // I. In ' . . I / • . / . In •.'• / : , / . ,' 1 - •/ ., / Z'. .• ' i5.. ' I HIGHLANDS/HAZEN / co • • I L • • e" - ! L iT /'1 . -. ....-• , 17.=0"_ZEJIMM ,. ,—, ....... .....___. 17-6 SETINCH,.: 1 • • I • ' STA WOW . / . ,f" - • r••••••- r 113.-r& • e E • ,/ . , r • . ;".'' I • r • CT1 . 113*-7"3 ' -----'.‹.------o-04 C.' / • •.::' i ...... :•1 ,.,/ : ._ I :15 I '‘ ,_______---------T.--------•-•--;; ../ WA0111-2 in • . -.• • . (7.3 , --, . P4'---------- -------. ---------------------- :-.--==.1.- -ti1V2'-2L.UL. - . ---------------------d-----1 / ,' ,..„---------;_..---- ./ cr-) ----- ---1 _,--" _--- SIIE KO= 0 ,...._/ .• / - . -.—...../..-.- a> TOTN.SCAPRE FOOTAGE 79.048 S031.2 PAAXNG ATMLYSIS (LE.TOLL NUMBER OF . 11224 138th AVENUE SE ...:c OF THE 91E: PARODIC SPACES REIXIIRED EU AM3 PROVGED.NUMBER Of : SPARE ROW OFF FLOOR RENTON. WA 96056 -.-. MD TOTAL°TERME)Or EACH COMPACT SPACES PROATED. / ..... NOTOCUAL WAENG•Ww:VOTT PAINNG SPACE IMENSICOG. USE:(NEW WELTER) 220 Sant POJNBER OF HIMCCAPPED • •Cr ICCESSLE SPACES.NCLUNAG • 3 TOTAL SCUMS FOLITAGE OF VAN SPACES): N/A.NO CHANGE 1 ...•••"' ALL DAMES(FCOTPATNT SOUTRE FOOTAGE or INTEFaOR . 1 WU mu 71•5., CU CF CAIN WONG)Ar43/CR PARKNG LOT UNDSCAPNG: N/A NO OVNIGE . ... USE: I •v-, en SOIL* SOLLTRE roma or ALL ovil PLAN , ,rtrA4 =MG RESIDENCE .4--. 219 SO.Ftt OTTER UNOSCAPNG: N/A.NO CAMODE COSMO WED TREE PLAN ...:r mow SHELTER'A' 240 93.11.3 AUDINEILE AND PROPOSED . 3 COSTING WELTER-r 150 SO.FTS 1217 MONOPOLE A GI 1951 ......• DULE•G NEWT: EasIDG TOTAL 1.431 SOFT-t -J MEM.TOTAL 1.651 STUTZ BUECNIG SON=REQUIRED 1 ra 1 1^ CC BY OXE ANO PROPOSED islt\VG I COMO mow&saran SITSCKS: 10,4:r I SiCET rum PERMIT=OF LOT 30,6 LLI COARAGE 1551/79.048. CASING ROW SETPAOCS: . ...:3\je•LOVW‘C.4-k./41,0 .02 OR ZS . 0::= PROPOSED MIMIC SOEVARD 511*-6 T4 0 ..../ PROPOSED MPG 16JR SETBMX 131,6 A-0- 05\1 NOTE: a as sa 44 ED = • E) STE PUN 6 A 1:1AGRAIAATC REPRESDRATOI ONLY. a la SO Co 03 NOT SCALE:'AM ALL DUFABICHS SIM ATTACHED REVEL 0 SITE PUN IS A EtAtIctimAITC REPRESENTATO4 Oity. . ... ........ . • C-3 ' DO NOT SOLE:VERIFY ALL 19,10.906 NTH ATTAGIED SURVEY. SCALE: l' . 217-6 I 2 Kw scom 31 1..i.J Cr.r• 1*. 287-CF I 1 TREE PLAN . • 6 OVERALL SITE PLAN • >c I' = y - TEST ANTENNA AfASILIPTI _,,,_ CAME BROX N0'� == MOMENT h" I)EwaaTE tan NELISSAR'Y ro CRC snE 5808 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. CPS"'"°"" 2)USE APPROVED W OW/mom FRADATION SURE (400 7: OCAVAIION TO FILL MO CRC(SOE WON CROWN 1002PgE AS'COATED:CO AACT TO 90Z OR. KIRKLAND. WASHINGTON 98033 ` /d( n WHERENIDXSTARY UNSUITABLE"A 10 TOMM SIX C010106;RE Wn„ 206-803-3222 •' ` 9900Z Ca NONGCERED FLL RO ICW will PROJEAGTED CT - WNACO PRIOR TO PROCEEDRIC --- -- - - - _ _ —4)_CR/DE AROUIO STEVER AS REOLVED.SE C 10 - - - - - - AL -- - - - ALL Or SIX PERKIER AT 25x ISWA -- _ PERROTER OF STRUCTURE _ FENCE PER DETAILS 5)wpm gar s/r SIM �i,/tarty r aoa 1111/1 NO FIHM.APPLY CHER GRACED.CCIPACTED SOIL. E7COINC G+ADE FNrsN c1U0E I I ^°' '->r d«,• 1..--'.�-.��:�_..�_--:-ti�.`:..v-:_.F�:"'_'--;:�."�.;.=- ^.•_mot._.��._----:R;::c(—'�s fir' } ri/\i///\%i'.'rt y-� "' =Z�' i i�i / GRNFEL PER NOTES C._T*Ctl 7/1\" V�/V>/�//'' �..,>/ .1/`' ` ¢'\•\% \ ►' \/ /�nl/ ___\\// / ��/ %i• , /iG /i./.�./�/,hi%\7�..":./i.,/.<!.\!\��!//iis'i.(� //<•\ /\/ /��/i.// COSTING UNDISTURBED �'��//i�i�i>� � .��• �1�:��:��./�����--- SO L SHELTER FOADDATDN MOCPaE PAC TYPCM. SITE SECTION suLE: 1/41 - ,•-D- 2 1 i ARCHITECTS.a.. .�n..w I SEATTT= 1as: P.uF+:. I I / AEURTE —L CWC " _ r'-X—. X --_ X _ X ,���� X - 1.• \ / 7FEFI97 201POC REVEM SET •• I /L X X I }.' - / SNFR97 DISC SET CRAVEI.NODE FENCED AREL SEE DR 2.MS 9I 1 / ROUTE OF UM:CRCROIND POWER ' I AID Turn: • 1 / I RL[fABF1GRD EOLREILf s,E1TER •'_ _. F.S // NOTE: � I PROJECT MU APPROK-2.025 SO FT FENCED APFA KW=1.849 SO FT / 1 1 I mom Ix _L _ ` / ra tu i D l' rT -- - X, I I 1 I I I r I , -c GRAVEL WOOED A oum-me ANTEING T TOP Or TOY TOKFL, 1 I yS N t I I CW -UNK FDCL AND GATE: IX C.ABLE D1 —N I I X J `,ELDD ca ccrDN PONT A NEST WOE WINK 1 1� I —Pa+E1I COINECTDN PONE Q • LOCATE CN CABLE DOGE: , ISO IDNOPGL — COOKIE STOOP. LP X SIR WOE i I a11Eit'F O CGLDATOI - 1 b ff. HIGHLAND8/HAZEN O 1 f� 2 v/LY.v • lf7sit SAM 1 X b I 1 Cn „r:. •L• X 0 ILL_ %'� it, WA0fi1-2 J,� I Q . X X_--:X X X I ` - b‘ SITE ACORN :LEASE UK ..-, TOWER / (2)MPS MlENNAS. 11224 138U1 AVENUE SE 3 LOCATE ON SHELTER / RENTON. WA 98056 N ;7� 7-11' y._6 / U.S.A. S,QTEA / .--� LEASE AREA ( gar mu 7 Q i SITE SECTION I CC 'OILS ENLARGED 5JReC g I ) LJ..1 PROPOSEDPRAT/EMOTEDEGIP,E 41 SHELTER IS MILD SEATED Z B UN r WA9CTON STATEaBD DFPARIYENT uR AND ADANSIREO CIWARNING SOTS AT DEW FONT Cr ACCESS TO AMENDS 9Y11 8E 1 -1. ` POSTEDtKM tsDRW N D TDN OE Fa51EIIOE OF RADID FFSaT1K'F Ream {sca MATE \- = Arms TOI/N0R COINAAACATDN mustsAND 1ITAIamND ALLZSSGO O CONNAACATION DOGESsFwl BE RESIRII I.•rED TON1ODAtuD PERSOIN.o1EY. , . ®N �_� *r ( % ��`N\wl�'' 0 1 P� 0 17 ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE: /,s-1-r 3 OI!iL• o PI c�cv v pFt\¢ �pl, INORTH EPEE or TONER PLATFORM + • I Rt TO BE O I1Eo TR TO TINE Weft r • 4. PP (AZOE T CT THE IONIN) Nie #: ' Tr-C tro fy ,,a,../I;(1)Nu -- -- -- -I Il ')NXLu(uP) ��� ,i.ITiI1W . 1;4 1€r 5808 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. iS • ?`;'`}: �r SUITE 1400 (T !®c ) r t j}!'!I)•1' s AX¢_Y EXtw • KIRKLANO, WASHINGTON 98033 /�ANIMA(3: 206-803-3222 1/14T.f� TOP OF IImaE i*}I. : L+•v A ONA(2:(II)j- .. • ANTENNA ♦ 1 4 576.6 11• 11Hi ANTFTNI lIP) - AM16L "t7 • L(I)FUTURE O IOW ANIUNA(ECM) AT EAOI(UP)ANTENNA _ . Cull Z.MELD HAfY LDG10N OF(1)TEST 10EE MO(2)CPS ANTENNAS • - -- b T'' - . 17 C 1.9otrou or TIC-} 5..DE 6�y fir. , : -b -! 1 L-V SIP R Ir-6 ow NIIEMIA orAL(uPi (�T :I OR I ANTEANTENNAMOUNT PIATWORY i' I F AC IlOINL MI ANIEA NFORWTION - I R SEE e N 1 FUTURE PANEL APEIETNAS NT (9 TOTAL) � , . .. LRt£ow ANfFI1N5(DDInM) . . (3)TOTAL ANTENNA YOUNT PLAN SCALE I/er - 1•-0-I I .. NN .:. PREFABRICATED SHELTER NOTES ARQQIICLTS"S1.0.•�.a ll w pl MaTER ELETIATIo16 ARE FOR CERERK INTIRINTON 0NLY. 3EAMX 1.0�-r frAflfm• SEE SHOP D0A2I foR L911PLETO 06CRPIIDN A/O OIC}606 177 MONOPOLE O SOIL ALE PEHE1RSTOl6 NO LUNHEI-IO16 TO E1T10EOR OF SNELIER NOX W RATED SEALANT infia 0SHELTTR TO HE DELIVERED TO OTt RE WNMffACNRER. GENERA(. ME . CONTRACTOR TO MULL PER MANUFACTURERS I6TRUCT1ORS • - :i TFEB97 IDMIK REVEU SET COORD9NIE DUPERY NO INSTALLATION 11101 PROJECT 1 0. I!. SWROT WNW SET Y • . Q • ' i g . ——— g F110)i06 b A• A • ' A Cr) • • SCALE T/C .1'-0"12 c*I • Cr; o � 6•-d IlQI DINN-LN%HENCE (POE ON NOT SFOON FOR CLARITY) C O . • TEST •MILEANTENNAoN HIGHLAND8/HAZEN Cr) • CABLE LEIPRffA90GRD Eg1PYEM :I'` yu Map • SHELTER . \ CPS ANTE . (2)CPS ANIENIN$mourn ON m0 EQUIPMENT SHELTER • WHOM-2 CRP STRIP . CU tIDrt FDrTURt • \L s '' 11224 138th AVENUE SE 3 NrA< �' RENTON, WA 98056 UNIT I - ' - . 5.voNelee .- ---------- i�• ,l.?rrr': SG. :r rrj --- �'�-� •.. Y/ Fg1NOATCN ' � SFQT 110E NNE OF PRNse,axe b '%T.' 1:. EXTE IAI t INS, cc m � ANT +' • MOUNT PI I y EL.1 z ry: 1, ' \\A`3 ISKIT NAM eA! • �-` \` o • aC' •`�`�N�O� • 'S R • • w �� A-2 o. y��T(o� REST SHELTER ELEVATION SCALE TIC-r-o•13 NORTH ELEVATION SSE:I/C- I•-d 4 WEST ELEVATION wiz vv.. T•-cr[5 PUN STJOE: I.I X • LEGEND: omTNG TLANs:aNER VAULT • I '�� t 4 ~ - Cu COPPER O.N. 01E1r1EA0 P�ROPEDDSF,D 111001010160TELOO OIIIE C.-Irv. TOOL MC. a emu ErfN �C.O Wp7R OILY GA WOEI - N _.= 0. ...err woo OD. DUISDE DNIETER 5808 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. 0 anao mo I.M. -�'� I SURE #400 0 TEETER eAQ CONTINUUM r - - - _ _ KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 • CI mama BOX EXIT. DOTINGI 206-803-3222 • WOE RECEPDIGlE rP lfATIERPROOc _ ��� s.TLa AS POW E SLICE ARR6TOR - __ SZL �99F_�76767E \\ _ ... AEACWT UNE • ME PUB PUBIX muff 06TBCT _ - - - - - - - - - - -\\ ---7 - - • - . NOTES: - - - ;�I� I. NRALLAT01 OF SECOO4Rr.POWER NO COWECTOI TO ICIER • \ 111111 - - SNLL EE COIP.E7ED N m1PlA1[E 111TN IWOIAIL 11ECTRIC 1 I CCOE NPPA 70.AIO THE STATE OF WA9MCTON LAIS.RULESEASELENT tNEAIO REGTMTO6 FOR NSTALLI C ELLCDRC 11REs S EOUPYENT. I 1ALL LATEST 65UE.AO MTH SPECi1G11ONS PER AS.T.IA B 231.B 4EO. I LCLA.SCSI-401.LC.EA Po1-570.ITOCAL OGLT16CAl MUTT COIOANE • 2. PWADE A IICIER BASE PER IDOL UR11T /STAINWOS. 110UD 01 SCE OF OWER 1U6@EDEMMERT 1 I 1 S/EL1EREASOADIT UM 3_ INQRISOUO CONDUT SIWL BE RCO POU1rOL CIIDROE \•�L \-' �1 1Jl/0.TYPE 1.CN IWUFAC TOLL OUPLI \• ��G651:rLSTWI PIASOCS OR GOAL PAAP6PACNRE0.CWPUILS ^ '\` ISHALL BE A1P-0N,H PAGT-sum T POE:SOl1ENT.CES1TRN TYPE COWATENE WITH PK DUCT.ALL BUDS SHA L BE I110E SWEEP.TYPE WON A 24-YWR N RAM1S. ALL COEOURjIUOW ROAOS 9MLL BE RGSS.(OR P1'C ENCASED N S it RED COICRLTE DUCTBMC). 4. CONMO TIED IOOORS SNYL BE ELT-APO RCO CALVANZ( '` I _ 1 ICONWISSION STEEL FOR OUD0g6.COUPUCS SHALL BE ROO STFE1 AND oNAler.AArltIN WARTED.ION ALL STU65-UPS.USE ROOO GLLYANZED STEEL • POrER AN0 TEL RU(lIE Oi' IAACIQTSG74-r�+I+.r�na�1 FOR CWT.SET SCREW MRCS ARE POT I SSATTLS LiNI.-� Vu�+:. COWXi 11i rIE A/O CAEILE OWL a THE TYPE AND STZE AS REOURm �, FX61NC EOUPYOR SPEL7ERT - I Br I C.lA E rLL E 1O SRCES ADORED. PROAOE POPE ' PIPLLNG IIVO IC US As EEIDED. 1 01 6. CONIRACIOR SHILL PROAOE TEST Cr TIC GROUNDNG SISTER .41 I �� BY FLARED MOW AGENT. PROVE WINK/OW TEST _• 1 :I OM RESULTS TO THE PROJECT NAPAGW FOR RENEIA. GRONPOIIG SISTER - • 7FEB97 2Oa1G REVIEW SET RES64VOE TO GROUND SPNIL NOT EXCEED S O.C. ALL ABOVE - • 1 OWE imam CROURIONO CONNECTORS 9i41 BE DOUBLE-WG o SPMR97 ZOP�IG,SET casess9R TYPE. AIL BELOW FAME MO EXPOSED EXTEROR ORQ.0IH G=VECTIORS TO PERMANENT EOUPYENT APO MD I BAN.MEWS 9M11 BE CIONUD TYPE CARE-SHALL BE TAKEN 10 MEYER CONIECmN LOCAIOIS MO WHEW APES TO WOO POSSIBLE CBLVNAC CCROSOL AU.EXPOSED CRp11OPO I CO6ECTPONS TO EC COVED 611H N01-CORROSPE AGENT SUOI AS 1 NO-0!Y.-N)N.65 OR'PFEEIROIF. VERIFY PNBOXI WITH I PROJECT YVAO;It ALL BOWS.OSIERS AND NUTS USED ON • =160.0•COUELi016 SHILL BE STAINLESS STEEL 7_ ALL OITOTIOR CROWD WAS DOLL BE COATED ism AND-COAAOSNE IT__T�_���-'�_ / n 1 AGENT SUOI AS IDS-3 R AS PER NOTE 6 ABOVE FIEI1I__ N. ALL J16C7gN AW OUTLET Ems TO BE LABELED 1OH1 Hum'TAPE. EQUIPMENT SHELTER - LOAD CALCULATION I OR DEAL=O46T60 ALL OROO IIJI COWED N UCH DOE 1 I MOORS 9. IOW OWIER SUPPLIED SURGE ARRESTOR NEST TO PAPEL DP. CONNUPAFAT1016 SVELTER I 1y' IllIk POKER CONNECTOR PONT i OW A 91Q�1ER D L IlE$ POKER AND NARY COEOUT/.NE PER LOAD GILCIAATION 1 r ; A TOTAL■-(1255)CO lT A NON-CONE WATTS AWAKE:14650, TEECO CONNECTION PONT LEL CONTRACTOR 91NL COORDNUE WIN sat SURREY TO LOCATE TOTAL■-273301 EaST8O U1WCROLND 0TURES. UEAEYER POTENTIAL CONFLICTS/ TOTAL A-TOTAL r/240 AMPS AYMABLE:61.9A 1 A I I I A NTEBLREIICES F TWO EXCAVATE TO AVOD DA1f•OE. CONTACT 1 �/ I Q ALL UTILO[5 TO LOCATE UIOEpUtpURq PIING VI PPIBJC RO.r. TOTAL A-96.12A �� I7_ wan'MAT AEC.OF THE DROP DOES NOT EXCEED 1HE M.0 RAMC 1WN FEEDER YIIE.20 3/0 -\� I±M -� :..:sii / I AC.T ACROACC ECOPE OI SHELTER 1104 ME EF OVW WAG. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG!! YNN BREAKER 512E:2001 II , _._�.`' ;:`,` ';` ;'.:: CF INC FUSIBLE SERYA E MINCE SWITO1 AND CONYN moms OF 1 ti :::.::::.:: 1 �__��- A I• NOTE:SRE.PLAN 61A DIAGP.RAYATC RFPRLSENTAION "L -i T ONLY-D4 NOT SCIiE:.:IRAEY LOCATIO6 . m GENERAL ELECTRICAL NOTES ) IA CAIH.T.S.18 ELECTRICAL PLAN $SCALE:3/Tr-T--o-114 CAJ • c*3 BY OW/TRACTOREft sPELTWx Is sa IOU[ I T.D 1OTE: SEE SITE PLAN THIS OUT FOR LOCATOR OF - - ... , 2r2 UNOWOtOUO ELZL1B EE C AND TELEPHONE SERVO _ :_,< -TNNa,LADE HIOHLANDB/HAZEN DELETE _ _ n / BASE(BY sWv _. -,< - - 01 NOTE:CONDUCTOR TO ROAM t100RUP OF /1 �+) O - EPITRNNCE; ' >r • EMERGENCY AP10 SPELTEA lXMS AS REWIRED / 2yi�C, _ _ -6AB6)O TAPE I OUTLINE OF Egi1ENT BUONO / 314/O _-/- / _-v= _A= SINE NAM J_.«_, NOTE:ALL Y BENDSLrl -••., INEXCAYNED 0-) TO LAVE TAN 2r BEND RADIUS / EIECIRIC sERvcE LETER ENttos1NE:SIIPPIED/ ac __ - - -- AND PETALLED BY CONTWCTOq PEN lOUL / b WRAw. C� / UiIJIY CO.REOIAIEANENIS / APT'OV D ■ Hi:. __.�� ^ aI�' C0IOACTED FILL-DOS I'N/96P CONIRACIOR SPALL pRWlOE sawn AROUND / L! _ . rN C IXICTOR5 NO BIAMG AT E110 M COUNT __ �,W V - EILCTBCLL comas); J-BOX o Mt ACONISS W AS MUSED NO PER IDCAL lR.lIT POWER COENECTXXt SEE OUTER 91DP ORArHCS C1J 3-14/0.2-1/YA RLS COIOUF STUB-IA t-1/��A le uu _ re um.50EDEXE(r EXOTIC TRAP6DI11ER VAULT; SIPPLCD ANO 16TAL1ED BY CONDACTOR ElEl:7AC SEANCE GROOM COWIETOR N rC 40,OR AS ~ UTILITY APPRp4D J-BOX 3/rA AS:SEIPPLED APD INSTALLED Br mammal: 3W4/0 • Fx•_•• A. ��` - SHOWN R PLAN sEE ALSO SHEET E-2 Nil.NE mwUm 11224 138th AVENUE SE Q !I RCS COMUXI.FXTEIO W 1P AED1E 200 NW ENERGOICI'C0IWATOR .•• - Coh 1NN.SCHEDULE 40, F16N GRADE RECEPTACLE SEE 51EL1ER 9Ov aAR6Ncs _T NTElcOR E1ECT SOUP(BT 9ELTER YIR) TEL GBLE T = �. - OR AS 90RI1 ON PUMA RENTON. WA 98056 / COE6ECi TDEppIE CD1O{XT D / U.S.A. Br UTILITY N COSTING tEIFPTOIE PED[STAL PER rC PM COIouI SCHm 40 STLe-ua, _-•_�c-_a (sEE i<OTc 9. • e. - IDOL TELERNUE UTILITY REOUROIFNIS _ SUPPLED A710 NSTAt1LD Br CONTRACTOR / TO. CONNEC7ON:SEE SKIM SHOP DRARrICS rC WITH -�TF1L0 SORYtE - -- ABOVE) _ COIVACim SANG PULL STRING• ENTRANCE • _ _ Q NI C STUB-UP�F1RM LOCAL UTILITY I SERVEZ 1R0U1O R00 PER LOCAL UTILITY CD. _ (20o LR) 'I _ 9EIT ME 3 A..0 :... SEE NSO SHEET E-2 ///i// �: - - lY ON / 7 TO UM, QEE ELECTRICAL PLAN CC J ----------------- .: rA RCS CONOUi 9Q BEND. common MUMMY rTDAN DASHED AREA l5 t ------------ -' APPLED AND 66TALLED Elf E1ECDRJL CONTRACTOR SEE® PART OF THE EOLARADAT SMELTER POWER RISER 1 - T r6 RCS COUNT.97 WOE WEEP Wet ADDLED---jam�' t------- ---- ----------- 1-.�--'�-c.RfS CONOIIi 90'WIDE 514FP fE)O•,ADORED - PMNME(NC)EXCEPT AS Noun ELEC U AILS 11J AND NNSTALLm BY CONTRACTOR N. Alo IINSUELED EM CONTFACiOR N Ze Pc I.EXCAVATE TO REOUAZEtD OEPTN }Tllft'yi' A/ Sal 40 LOCATE PER1TE)OI DETNE.MIRY SEAVCE: rPOYOE POI T SOCDLR0 7EDAOEE PER THE RN rA FAX 2.y MOLES. L 9(0590IXR PER I soar MINER Alb 1 I CONDUCTORS R FOAL LEMON PILL ROPE N COIp.T - SEE Uf0.0Y TRENCH DETAIL CONDUIT SC1ED 40-LOCATE PW TRENCH OETAI. VV'^ LOCAL AS WOWED. WIRES Sr OOP CO-0P TEE SHEET PROYOE MU.LENGTH PULL ROPE N c cum KRrr WITH NOTE ONE-LIE DNCRAY SHOP. 6 FOR DESIpE NiEHT ONLY. tDFAL iE1EANo1E CO.RFDI11ifLF1As VERVY All REDWOODS 1RTH PRCUECT MANAGER AND 3 r.I BEFORE_MU dv^ tL3 POWER RISER DIAGRAM (APPUm AW 6N6TYI r BY coNlTLAnoR) LOCAL Ui U Y AUTFEORIIT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING■1i11 WORK E-' g P�NN\NG z • o _ / i �z1 . (}p1�1 N.T.S. 9 N.T.S.112 r TRENCH DETAIL N.T.S i iS I HIDE SCiIL•�rV`.r\f pV"ilik u 1 BOARD OF ADJUSTMEFI PUBLIC HEARING MAY 28, 1997 MINUTES The minutes, as follows, are not verbatim transcript but a general summary of the issues discussed. The official record is recorded on tape. MEETING#05-97 BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Ellery Brown, Lee Connel, William Anderson, Jim Jacques, Dennis Dochnahl and Teri Briere. Motion made and seconded to excuse Boardmember Quesenberry. CITY STAFF PRESENT Jim Hanson, Development Services Director; Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor; Larry Warren, City Attorney; Mark Pywell, Project Manager; and Karen Codiga, Recording Secretary 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment was called to order by Chairperson Brown at 7:30 PM. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairperson Brown led the Board and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. 3. ROLL CALL Chairperson Brown announced the meeting was being recorded both physically and mechanically,for future reference. A roll call resulted in the following members being present: Ellery Brown, Lee Connel, William Anderson, Jim Jacques, Dennis Dochnahl and Teri Briere. MOTION made by Boardmember Anderson to excuse absent Boardmember Quesenberry; seconded by Boardmember Dochnahl. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ACTION: Motion made by BOARDMEMBER Briere and seconded by BOARDMEMBER Connel that the Minutes of April 23, 1997 be approved as written and distributed. MOTION CARRIED. • Board of Adjustment Minuica May 28, 1997 Page 2 5. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED VARIANCE FILE NO. LUA-97-045,V REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION FREDDIE'S CLUB SIGN VARIANCE The applicant seeks a variance from the Sign Code in order to construct a sign with an electronic message center (reader board) within 10' of the public right-of-way, the edge of the sign would be within 4'6" of the road right-of-way. Normally the Code would require a minimum setback of 75'for a sign with an electronic reader board. Location: 111 South Third Street. Chairperson Brown read a letter from Boardmember Jacques requesting reconsideration on Freddie's Club Sign Variance. The letter is dated May 15, 1997. The letter stated that there are two areas of concern; those being (1) the sign structure setback required by the Sign Code was not correctly shown on the drawings reviewed by the Board of Adjustment; a 10 foot setback is required for any sign in the CA Zone; and (2) the variance, as granted, may not meet all the required criteria for granting such a variance. Chairperson Brown stated that since the granting of the Freddie's Club Sign Variance on April 23, 1997, there has been a moratorium placed by the City Council on all signs within a defined district. Chairperson Brown introduced Jim Hanson, Development Services Director, to explain some of the detail that the City has encountered on this particular issue (Freddie's Club). Jim Hanson, Development Services Director, presented information pertaining to the Request for Reconsideration. Mr. Hanson informed the Board that City staff discovered the Freddie's Club sign that the Board granted the variance from the 75 foot setback for the electronic message center, also required a minimum 10 foot setback from the front property line. The plans that the Board reviewed and that City staff reviewed, were somewhat confusing. It did state in a number of places in the staff report and in the application that the sign did have a 10 foot setback. The 10 foot setback was actually to the pole that holds up the sign, however, there is a large cover on the pole that extends all the way to the ground which essentially makes the sign a ground sign as defined by the City's Sign Ordinance. Ground signs are allowed within the setback, however, the ground sign maximum height is 6 feet. There was no variance application for the extra height for a ground sign. Conversely, if the applicant wanted the sign to be considered a free standing sign (a pole sign) ,which is what they applied for,then that large cover making it a ground sign, would need to be removed and that there would need to be a 10 foot setback. Mr. Jacques contetnds that the plans submitted to the Board for review and that staff reviewed, did not give the true picture of the setback and how it relates to the Sign Code. For that reason, Mr. Jacques asked that the Board reconsider so that the Board could get all the information and the true picture of exactly what kinds of setbacks were relevant to what types of signs. Mr. Hanson pointed out that the City Council has passed a sign moratorium at this point for all signs in this area and that a public hearing will be held June 2, 1997 on this subject. Chairperson Brown announced that at this point, the request for reconsideration was presented to the Board for action. ACTION: BOARDMEMBER DOCHNAHL stated that the variance granted for Freddie's was misrepresented as proposed and granted at the April 23, 1997 meeting. BOARDMEMBER DOCHNAHL made a MOTION to deny the variance as proposed and granted at the April 23, 1997 meeting, due to the new evidence presented. . BOARDMEMBER Brier seconded the motion. VOTE: Dennis Dochnahl, deny; Jim Jacques, deny; Bill Anderson, deny; Teri Briere, deny; Lee Connel, deny: Dennis Dochnahl, deny; Ellery Brown, deny. MOTION CARRIED. . -2- Board of Adjustment Micu.�s May 28, 1997 Page 3 Chairperson Brown announced that this particular variance has been denied by action of the Board of Adjustment. Chairperson Brown announced that an appeal of the Board's decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I, which requires that such an appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within 21 days from the date of issuance of the decision. The Board of Adjustment decision will become final on June 20, 1997 if the decision is not appealed to Superior Court. (21 day appeal period plus 3 days allowed for mailing) Chairperson Brown made a recommendation that the applicant meet with City staff at the soonest opportunity in order to discuss the appropriate variances regarding to the proposed sign for Freddie's Club. Chairperson Brown advised that the original variance requested, and granted by the Board on April 23, 1997, has been denied in light of the new information provided. Chairperson Brown introduced Mr. Larry Warren, City Attorney. Mr. Warren stated that it is. appropriate for staff to meet with Mr. Steiner and explain what has happened and advise him of his opportunities to address the City Council, staff and the Board of Adjustment, further on this matter. This would be to ensure he understands his rights after what has taken place tonight. Chairperson Brown stated that he believes staff is not saying that a sign cannot be done, but there are a number of things that have to be straightened out in terms of how the sign is built. Mr. Glenn Galliher. Neon Sign Systems, stated that he had previously went over all required criteria with Mr. Bob Arthur, who is with the Building Department, before the application was submitted. He was told that the pole cover was just fine, that it was a single pole sign, and that is the reason the application was submitted the way it was. Chairperson Brown stated that he understands this, however, with the new information presented apparently the original application did not clearly define the full requirements of the zoning and planning ordinance which defines a ground sound as only 6 feet in height. This particular sign, which is considered.a ground sign, is 12 feet high which means the applicant would have to apply for a variance for the additional height. A height variance was not presented to the Board on April 23, 1997. Mr. Brown also stated that the other type of sign the applicant would be allowed is a free standing sign which is a pole sign which means you eliminate the lower part of the sign and that can be within a 10 foot setback. Chairperson Brown explained further that the requirements are clearly defined in the ordinance and that the applicant should work with staff to come up with an amicable conclusion. Chairperson Brown explained that the way the variance was originally presented to the Board, the Board did not have a clear picture of the requirements. Chairperson Brown requested staff to present the second items on the agenda. Mark R. Pywell, Project Manager, presented the staff report. VARIANCE FILE NO. LUA-97-031,ACU,ECF,V NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS VARIANCE The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit, environmental review, and a height variance in order to construct a 134' 8"tall monopole with a 220 square foot utility building for an unmanned communications facility. Structures are normally restricted to a maximum height of thirty (30) feet in the RM-N Zone. Location: 4715 NE 12th Street. Background: Nextel Communications, Inc. (Nextel) requests consideration of a Conditional Use - Permit for the construction of an Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio (EMSR) facility on a hilltop located south of NE 12th Street and East of Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility will consist of a single 120-foot self-supporting tower with multiple antennas and a 220 square foot prefabricated building for associated electronic equipment. The proposed communication site will occupy a 2,025 square feet lease area located within an existing 79,038 square foot lot presently owned by Robert Fricks. The project site would thus encompass approximately two -3- Board of Adjustment Minu«a May 28, 1997 Page 4 percent of the subject property. The site is located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE, directly south of NE 12th Street. The subject property contains one single family residence, located approximately 60 feet southwest of the tower site. Another existing telecommunication facility with a lattice tower and equipment building is located approximately 16 feet north of the Nextel site. An improved road has been constructed off of NE 12th Street to serve this existing telecommunication facility. The proposed project site will be served by an extension of this access roadway. The subject property is designated as RM-N (Multi-family Residential - Neighborhood) on the City of Renton Zoning Map and is designated CN (Center Neighborhood),on the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Element Map. Construction of the proposed tower will take place on a wooded site currently occupied by a telecommunications tower. The proposed monopole will be slightly above the height of the trees in proximity to the site. As a result, the applicant believes that no views will be obstructed by construction of the proposed project. • The applicant proposes to construct a self-supporting 120-foot.tower to serve as support for several antennas. The antennas will extend beyond the top of the tower, reaching a maximum height of 134' 8". The antennas on the proposed tower will consist of three omni-directional antennas mounted near the top of the tower. In addition, two GPS antennas and one test mobile antenna will be mounted on the equipment building. Future plans call for the possible addition of nine panel antennas and two omni-directional antennas to be located on the tower as future demand warrants. The equipment shelter will consist of a 10-foot tall prefabricated state certified, concrete building. The outside dimensions of this building will be 11' X 20'. This shelter would be used to house associated electronic equipment and other essential equipment for the operation of the facility. The equipment would include a distribution panel, surge suppressers, battery rack, and control cabinet racks. Mark then went through the variance criteria: ' i Criteria No. 1, The applicant states that due to the nature and type of communication facility 1 proposed, strict application of the height limitations of the RM-N zone would prohibit location on this property. A 120-foot monopole was deemed required through engineering studies to provide adequate service coverage to Coal Creek Parkway and along SR 900 from 132nd Avenueeast to 156th Avenue. Use of a shorter tower would require the location of additional towers in the same area to provide the same coverage as one pole at a height of 120 feet. There is an existing 123-foot monopole 16 feet north of the proposed tower. The applicant believes that this existing tower establishes precedence for height variances within the neighborhood area for this type of.structure. Criteria No. 2, that the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity or zone in which the subject-- property is situated also appears to be met. The applicant feels that the proposed facility is similar in size and appearance to other communication facilities in rural areas of Renton. The monopole tower antenna support structure was selected for use because it will facilitate co-location of two wireless telecommunications providers and obviate the need to construct separate, additional towers or monopoles for each provider. This area of Renton will benefit from a reduction in the number of antenna support structures that must be erected. The applicant states that the tower construction -4- Board of Adjustment Mir May 28, 1997 Page 5 will meet or exceed all federal, state and local building code requirements. The development site (45'X 45) will be enclosed with a locked six (6) foot high chainlink fence that will be topped with three strands of barbed wire. The equipment shelter is similar in size and function to a large accessory structure such as a tool shed. In compliance with ordinance requirements, the facility will be landscaped to provide sufficient screening for the facility. The applicants landscape plan includes the following plants: Douglas Fir, Western Red Cedar, Paper Birch, Serviceberry, and Pacific Wax Myrtle. As an additional screening device, the security fencing will be fitted with wooden slats. The site is located within a wooded area of the central portion of the subject 1.82 acre parcel. The equipment shelter and much of the lower portion of the tower would be screened in all directions by numerous existing trees, primarily consisting of evergreens such as cedar and fir. Criteria No. 3, that the approval will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations on uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. Height variances for monopoles have been granted by the City of Renton on past projects. It also should be noted that there is an existing 123-foot tall monopole 16-feet from the location of the proposed tower. Criteria No. 4, that the approval, as determined by the Board of Adjustment, be the minimal variance that would accomplish the desired purpose. The applicant's engineers have determined that an antenna mounting of 120-feet is required to achieve the necessary coverage for this service area, Coal creek Parkway and SR 900 from 132nd Avenue east to 156th Avenue. Use of a shorter tower on this site would require the location of additional towers in the same area to provide the same coverage as one pole at a height of 120 feet. Mark Pywell advised that there are two conditions placed on the Conditional Use Permit. These two conditions are as stated in the staff report. These conditions relate to landscaping of the site and removal of the monopole should Nextel discontinue use. This concluded the staff report. Mark stated that he would answer any questions at this point. ACTION: BOARDMEMBER CONNEL moved that the public • hearing be closed. BOARDMEMBER Anderson seconded." MOTION CARRIED. CHAIRPERSON Brown called for discussion and a decision from the Board. BOARDMEMBER Briere asked staff if there were restrictions on how much equipment could be put on a monopole. Mark Pywell advised that there were no restrictions at this time, however, the City of Renton was reviewing a personal communication system ordinance in an attempt to resolve some of these issues and also potentially look at different ways of handling the height rather that going through a variance procedure. The ordinance is only in draft form at this time. BOARDMEMBER Connel stated that, as he understands it, the site is leased from the owner for a period of 25 to 30 years and the owner has the privilege of leasing land to 10 companies should he choose to. Boardmember Connel commented that he understands where it would be desirable to utilize a pole for more than one company, limiting the number of poles to be erected, however, it bothered him that there was no real limit. Mark Pywell advised that at this time, there is no real limit. He further stated that these are handled through Administrative Conditional -5- Board of Adjustment Minutes May 28, 1997 Page 6 Use Permits and some of the requirements of a Conditional Use Permit are the findings that have effects on adjacent property, both visual and physical and also compatibility. At some II point, if a significant number were being proposed on this site then staff and the appropriate hearing body could make a determination that the site was exceeding that level of compatibility or, if needed, recommend denial of towers. Mark Pywell stated that the City would probably see more thought on the part of the City put into what the limits should be as part of the draft ordinance being proposed. BOARDMEMBER Brown invited the applicant to speak. Mr. Don Klausing Matthews Land Company, Inc. c/o Nextel Communication 5808 Lake Washington Boulevard, Ste.400 II Kirkland,WA 98033 it Mr. Klausing explained how his company goes about choosing sites for locating monopoles. He explained that they locate mainly in commercial zones and look for co-locating possibilities. Mr. Klausing explained that his company is proposing to build a second pole at this site as the monopole presently on site currently has two carriers using it and this is the limit. Mr. Klausing stated that Nextel would look for co-locating suppliers for the second monopole. CHAIRPERSON Brown closed the public hearing and opened discussion by the Board. ACTION: BOARDMEMBER DOCHNAHL made a motion to grant the Administrative Conditional Use Permit and the Variance, as presented by the applicant, subject to the conditions stated in the staff report, and subject to the letter stating that the pole can be used another carrier. The justification is that: the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to size, shape,topography, location of the surrounding property vis a vis neighboring properties, etc. It's not based upon economic hardship, etc.;that the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the - property or improvements in the vicinity or zone in which the subject property is situated also appears to be met;that the approval will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations on uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; that the approval, as determined by the Board of Adjustment; be the minimal variance that would accomplish the desired purpose BOARDMEMBER Connel second the motion. !i VOTE: BOARDMEMBER Dochnahl, yes; BOARDMEMBER Jacques, yes; Bill Anderson, yes; II Teri Briere, yes; Lee Connel, yes; Ellery Brown, yes. MOTION GRANTED CHAIRPERSON Brown announced that appeal of the Board's decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I, which requires that such an appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within 21 days from the date of issuance of the decision. The Board of Adjustment decision will become final on June 20, 1997 if the decision is not appealed to II Superior Court. (21 day appeal period plus 3 days allowed for mailing). 6. OLD BUSINESS li None -6- Board of Adjustment Minutes 0 "` May 28, 1997 Page 7 7. NEW BUSINESS Karen Codiga, Recording Secretary, questioned the Board regarding BOA grant letters mailed via "certified" mail. Karen explained the cost of this action. Board members discussed this issue. BOARDMEMBER Anderson made a MOTION that the Board continue to mail grant letters via certified mail. BOARDMEMBER Dochnahl seconded the motion. 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS None. 9. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, BOARDMEMBER Anderson moved that the meeting be adjourned. BOARDMEMBER Briere seconded the motion. Chairperson Brown adjourned the Board of Adjustment meeting following a unanimous vote. Chairperson Brown 7/2j/? Approval Date • -7- • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION t Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal RGNTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language I A Public Hearing will be held by the continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Renton Board of Adjustment at its regular -- meeting in-the Council Chambers, on the Journal has-been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the second floor of City Hall, Renton, State of Washington for King County. Washington, on May 28, 1997 at 7:30 PM toThe'notice in the exact form attached,waspublished in the South County NEXTEL onsider the following variance: COMMUNICATIONS Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers LUA-97-031,ACU,ECF,V during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a i The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit, environmental , review, and a height variance in order to Notice of Public Hearing - LUA-97-031, ACU, ECF, V construct a 134' 8" tall monopole with a 220 square foot utility•building for an unmanned communications facility. as published on: 5/16/97 Structures are normally restricted to a max- imum height of thirty(30)feet in the RM-N The full amount of the fee charged for said fore of ublication is the sum of$36.50 Zone.Location:ldescriptions 4715 NE 12thth filest. g g Legal of the files noted Legal Number 3040 above are on file in the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal . Building, Renton.All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at /n - , the Public Hearing to express their r ` . opinions. • Legal Cle , outh Cou Journal Published in the South_ County Journal I. 18_1997.3040 __ Subscribed and sworn before//me on this_ ay of Y Il , 19 q 7 _______Ka .c&i_i- 1rh- —441.Lfel_ . s�E-,i` iv r_®®0 L;<.=s;oF�',-:;' ae Notary Public of the State of Washington i�`34-��� ' ,4;.... pi residing in Renton o e `� i ,. O v. PO King County, Washington % U,p P _ _tr• owe #i �;d c B L oo� ,i t � �G ' d2ela sss8,\ .s uF WASN—'®,®\.moo® y : CITY -OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 30, 1997 • CERTIFIED MAIL NO. P 419 792 302 Mr.Tim Donnelly Matthews Land Company, Inc. do Nextel Communications 5808 Lake Washington Boulevard, Ste. 400 Kirkland,WA 98033 • SUBJECT: Nextel Communications on NE 12th Project No. LUA-97-031,ACU,ECF,V Dear Mr. Donnelly: ;;� The Renton Board of Adjustment, at its regular meeting on May 28, 1997, finalized approval of the Administrative Conditional Use Permit (ACU) and granted your request for a variance from City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-31-8 (RM-N). The ACU and variance are approved subject to the following conditions: 1. . The applicant shall submit a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any permits. This plan shall include the type of plant materials, size of plant materials, and location of the plant materials. 2. The applicant shall submit a letter of agreement stating that the applicant agrees to allow for the potential co-location of additional Wireless Communication equipment by other providers on the applicant's structure or within the same location; and that the applicant agrees to remove the facility within six(6) months after that site's use is discontinued. This is the only variance granted under this application and all other provisions of the Renton Municipal Code will apply. . An appeal of the Board of Adjustment's decision is governed by Title IV, Chapter 36, Section I, which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within 24 days from the date of issuance of the decision. This administrative land use decision will become final on June 20, 1997, if the decision is not appealed to Superior Court. If you have any questions, please contact me at(425)277-5586. For the Renton Board of Adjustment, 070, Mark R. Pywell P . Project Mana r cc: Mr. Robert Fricks/Property Owner Parties of Record: Mr. Marcus Handler; Mr. Paul Inghram • BOAGRANT.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 P 419 792 302 ?, US Postal Service- Receipt for Certified Mail ,t.i '. s No Insurance Coverage Provided. Do not use for Internation I Ma' ee rem! erg ) (f StreeSenile! Nyrnbe pos f ce,_$ta e, ode q I .tKlV u)Yr 67g03- 3 Postage $ I Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee r rn Return Receipt Showing to • r Whom&Date Delivered , Q Return Receipt Showing to Whom, - Date,&Addressee's Address i 0 TOTAL Postage&Fees $ ch Postmark or Date 0 - -v 0 = — —— —N -- -- - - VSEN •ComDERems 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the co •Complete items 3,4a,and 4b. ,-, following services(for an H ■Print your name and address on the reverse of this form-so that we can return this extra fee): 5 card to you. ■Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address •Z a) ■permit. e'Retum Receipt Requested'on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery t f, ■The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date a 1 e delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. .� 0 3.Article Addressed to . 4a.Article Number P. c 0. �1r-�Vvl i�)�. _ E E 4b.Service Type d A� Li,/��1' 1---'- °�.` loon — I ❑ Registered ; Certified cr fn N f�� � 0 Express Mail ❑ Insured of ui c ¢ �, w 00 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 COD 0 0 7.Date of Delive 097 . 5.Received B (Print Name) 8.Addressee's A�dress(Onlyif requested 1 Y ( 9 c w and fee is paid) s ¢ t- 6.7a re:( dr ssee or Agent) Q ti t t i i 4e - ifi ii sP: iiitiiii fs iii rigs i t i A ii • iii`, 1; m. ' + '•i'iiiii iit fiiitililfl /1 tii Ill/ 1 PSt Form 3811;December 1'994 ` "' 1 102595-97-B-0179 Domestic Return Receipt -I Washington State Northwest Region WAir Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DATE: May 16, 1997 (;ITY OF RFNTON TO: Mark Pywell MAY 2 1 1997 City of Renton, Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South RECEIVED Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 405 MP 4.02 CS 1744 Determination of Nonsignificance-Nextel Facility on 12th Street, construct 134' 8" tall monopole with a 220 sq. ft. utility bldg. File No.LUA-97-31,AUC,ECF,V FROM: Robert A. Josephsoro PP1 , Manager of Planning & Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, whichis located at 4715 NE 12th Street. Our response is below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments. The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 1` ; MATTHEWS . `CITY OF RENTON Land Company 4 `Mr:Mark Pywell;'AICP" - L. Planning Department.: : " . City,of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South ' Renton.'WPi:98055` RE: Nextel-Communications Facility ,Highlands/I azen Site'-(WA0i 11-2) Dear Mr Pywell: ' Thank you,for,your transmittal of the Department of Natural Resources ('DNR)-letter y: • :dated April28,•1997. The DNR had indicated in their letter that they had interest in the subject project;and that a fore st practices permit may be'required: However, in my recent phone'call to David Weiss of the DNR, he indicated that a permit is only required'when , one truckload Or:more of timber would be:removed from the.site. 1 '' After-1 clarified that We would only;be removing"four trees as part of.the construction ! '' process,,Mr.,Weiss indicated that we would;notbe harvesting sufficient;wood to initiate a ' ` :forest practices perm1 , and that the DNR had no`further comment`on theproject. If you have any'questions"''on:this inquiry, please f eel-free"to"contact me at the number:. - below. Sincerel Tom Donnelly, = . :LandUse`Planner cc:.: • -Mary Murdoch, Systems Development Manager,•Nextel'Communications,' Matthews Land Company, 116th Avenue S.E.,Suite 120, • Bellevue,Washington 98004 .425.453(9!500r'■ .Fax:'.425-.453.9905 -7-4) CrA. AT OF RENTON =I I \ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 12, 1997 Mr. Tom Donnelly Matthews Land Company, Inc. d o Nextel Communications 5808 Lake Washington Boulevard, Suite 400 • Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Nextel Communications Project No. LUA-97-031,ECF,CU,V Dear Mr. Donnelly: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. As you are aware, a public hearing will be held on May 28, 1997 before the Renton Board of Adjustment to finalize the administrative Conditional Use (CU) Permit and to consider the Variance (V) portion of this project application. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, Ma/P /,‘ Mark R. P , AICP Project Ma ager • • FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ..i ti r ;% t. CIT'A_ OF RENTON Q. � Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator May 06, 1997 Mr. Ellery Brown 506 S. 17th Street Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Board of Adjustment Meeting May 28, 1997 Dear Ellery: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, has made temporary arrangements for Larry Warren, City Attorney,to meet with the Board of Adjustment at 6:30 PM on May 28, 1997 to discuss the Board's duties and responsibilities. Please call me and confirm that you can attend. Leave a voice message any time day or night. Thank you. The regularly scheduled Board of Adjustment meeting will take place at 7:30 PM on May 28, 1997 in the Council Chambers. The Development Planning Section has received the following variance requests. These are described as follows: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS/LUA-97-031,ACU,ECF,V The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit, environmental review, and a height variance in order to construct a 134'8"tall monopole with a 220 square foot utility building for an unmanned communications facility. Structures are normally restricted to a maximum height of thirty(30)feet in the RM-N Zone. Location: 4715 NE 12th Street. The staff report and agenda will be mailed to you approximately one week prior to the meeting. Enclosed are the °draft" Minutes from the April 23, 1997 Board of Adjustment meeting. Please review and provide me with any comments or changes you may have prior to the May 28, 1997 meeting. Your continuing support to the Board of Adjustment is very much appreciated. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-5582. Sincerely, Karen Codiga Planning/Building/Public Works Division Development Planning 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 91-02) ir li,•Iv APR 3 01997 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF Natural Resources cry op BELCHER PUBLIC nt of Public Lands KALE GHAM Supervisor DATE: April 28, 1997 TO: Greg Zimmerman, PE Admin. Public Works Dept . 200 Mill Ave So. Renton, WA 98055 FROM: David John Weiss Resource Protection Specialist South Puget Sound Region SUBJECT REVIEW OF: Nextel Facility on NE 12th St . ACTION SPONSOR: Nextel Communications 2 PROJECT: Timber Harvest / Land Conversion [] We do not have an interest in the above project and have no comments on the proposal. [X] We do have an interest in the above project and wish to make the following comments: A *forest practices permit will be required for the harvest of timber associated with this project. • cc: Dave Dietzman - SEPA Center - DNR SEPA#: 011750 SOUTH PUGET SOUND REGION 28329 SE 448TH ST I PO BOX 68 I ENUMCLAW,WA 98022-0068 I FAX(360)825-1672 I TTY.•(360)825-6381 I TEL:(360)825-1631 o.66 .08 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer RECYCLED PAPER%. • -,•5 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DiVISION .................................................................................................................•.. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the IE54 day of ArrviL , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United • States,'a sealed envelope containing • R-e\ooR avid tectv‘ documents "This information was sent to: • Name Representing v ovreV\ek-ret Net..A&A PAU,Ya0C)A Y‘ek-teA SZobe • • (Signature of Sender) ,51...V1/46-1k 11- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ‘,..mii)x)/q >71/, signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and 'purposes mentioned in the instrument. v ‘N IA Dated: L 11)/46 .5* N ary Pu c in an f r the State of Waqngt,pn rr. Notary (Print) My appointment expires: 6//10,4r Project Name: ne.ikt.\ f&CtttM 011 Y\E 1/-141 Project Number: 1 — 0031 ELr V NOTARY.DOC ,/ REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION, & Variance Report REPORT DATE: April 10, 1997 Project Name: Nextel Facility on NE 12th Street Applicant: Nextel Communications Owner. Tom Donnelly Mathews Land Company File Number: LUA-97-031,ACU,ECF,V Project Manager: Mark R. Pywell Project Description: The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit, environmental review, and a height variance in order to construct a 134' 8" tall monopole with a 220 square foot utility building for an unmanned communications facility. Structures are normally restricted to a maximum height of thirty (30) feet in the RM-N Zone. Project Location: . 4715 NE 12th Street Exist. Bldg. Area SF: N/A Proposed New Bldg. 220 sf • Area SF: ' Site Area: 79,048 sf` Total Building Area SF: 220 sf • j t V CENTRAL ;j _ _ 6 E w ' a Z ,,I } ire 05 © D , HIGHLANDS PLAZA:; _- _ iz.,.i 111 , •6'a 7'-- -- 6 : I ,©_ „�® 4�1 . G a (21 {]I OI (al O ® t Hi-r9 ST�IM1bP�^F iMM9.�NE—_E -___ f!Y - - r.:1f�.�lFa�—' -. ri `-'.J9 I a-..w a.m Y 9 w y ' O ...mn,'nmlTreslsr, 1 • dt. < i LLJJ Q�: ..nun �^ N .TWIN- -7 i 1 .�,•, 1''�'O' • - ' 6f1.9Ac�' r..DN® E a i •Ia'.,• i V' 1u.� .s M.le.�.. _ , 6l71 i L® - 1 t, Y 3°l ' %-, � J.N.,.oDlm.r d •w—"' 1. Ac OF c' ill . I: I.Q.> _ e ,IG ': ,, 1ina - - it2. - JOhnme L 44 191 Ac I l B QV xr © / i . Claude J Buchard i e IHIc. ® 01Ac - [ I Iji �-( v a®',I 9Ac O Q ,© © — Edward H.II I.96Ac wu _ Project Location Map . --- - , STAFFRP DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department 'tinistrative Conditional Use Permit Approval,Et :mental Review, &Variance Staff Report • NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH SIicGC'T - LUA-97 031,ACU,ECF,V REPORT AND DECISION OFApril15,1997 Page 2of12 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND Nextel Communications, Inc. (Nextel) requests consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio (EMSR) facility on a hilltop located south of NE 12th Street and East of Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility will consist of a single 120- foot self-supporting tower with multiple antennas and a 220 square foot prefabricated building for associated electronic equipment. The proposed communication site will occupy a 2,025 square feet lease area located within an existing 79,038 square foot lot presently owned by Robert Fricks. The project site would thus encompass approximately two percent of the subject property. The site is located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE, directly south of NE 12th Street. The subject property contains one single family residence, located approximately 60 feet southwest of the tower site. Another existing telecommunication facility with a lattice tower and equipment building is located approximately 16 feet north of the Nextel site. An improved road has been constructed off of NE 12th Street to serve this existing telecommunication facility. The proposed project site will be served by an extension of this access roadway. The subject property is designated as RM-N (Multi-family Residential - Neighborhood) on the City of Renton Zoning Map and is designated CN (Center Neighborhood) on the Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Element Map. Construction of the proposed tower will take place on a wooded site currently occupied by a telecommunications tower. The proposed monopole will be slightly above the height of the trees in proximity to the site. As a result, the applicant believes that no views will be obstructed by construction of the proposed project. The applicant proposes to construct a self-supporting 120-foot tower to serve as support for several antennas. The antennas will extend beyond the top of the tower, reaching a maximum height of 134' 8". The antennas on the proposed tower will consist of three omni-directional antennas mounted near the top of the tower. In addition, two GPS antennas and one test mobile antenna will be mounted on the equipment building. Future plans call for the possible addition of nine panel antennas and two omni-directional antennas to be located on the tower as future demand warrants. The equipment shelter will consist of a 10-foot tall prefabricated state certified, concrete building. The outside dimensions of this building will be 11' X 20'. This shelter would be used to house associated electronic equipment and other essential equipment for the operation of the facility. The equipment would include a distribution panel, surge suppressers, battery rack, and control cabinet racks. STAFFRPT.DOC City ofRenton P/B/PWDepartment tinistrative Conditional Use Permit Approval,Et mental Review, &Variance Staff Report NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET LUA-97 031,ACU,ECF,V REPORT AND DECISION OFApril 15,1997 Page 3 of 12 PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: The project will require a minor amount of grading to occur for the foundation of the tower and for the building foundation. The applicant will need to install and maintain temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the Development services Division inspector. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: N/A (2) Air Impacts: Adverse impacts to air quality during the construction phase of the project would be limited to fugitive dust during the time that grading would expose the surface soils and to the exhaust from construction vehicles. Fugitive dust can be controlled by sprinkling the site as required during the construction phase of the project: Air quality impacts from the construction vehicles will be temporary in nature and is already regulated by state and federal standards. Once the construction phase of the project is completed the applicant will landscape the disturbed portions of the site that are not covered by structures. This will prevent any dust from the project site escaping onto adjacent residential lots. Mitigation Measures: None Required. Policy Nexus: N/A (3) Water Impacts: Only approximately 240 square feet of impervious area will be constructed as part of this project. The applicant contends that any storm water runoff from this impervious area will be able to infiltrate into the ground. The City of Renton, Ordinance does not require detention or storm water quality facilities for this amount of new impervious surface. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: N/A STAFFRPT.DOC City ofRenton PB/PWDepartment ,inistrative Conditional Use Permit Approval,Ea ;,mental Review,&Variance Staff Report • NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH ST i T LUA-97 031,ACU,ECF,V REPORT AND DECISION OFAprtl 15,1997 Page 4 of 12 B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS-M' with 15 day Comment. and Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS with 15 day Comment and Issue•DNS-M with 15 day Comment Appeal Period. Period followed by.a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures None required Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following.notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination.. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. AIRPORT MANAGER 1. The base of the tower is 442.0.feet above sea level. The tower height is 135 feet (including antennas). Total height above sea level will be 577 feet. The tower will be located outside of Airport Conical Surface by approximately 300 feet. The tower antennas will be approximately 198 feet above the 379 foot elevation of the conical surface. This, because of the antenna location, is considered to be significant. 2. A Notice of Proposed Construction should be required to be submitted to the FAA, and received back from the FAA, prior to granting any height variance or building permit. 3. If lighting is required by the FAA, Nextel must be made responsible for the maintenance of the lighting. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION A. Type of Land Use Action Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit xx Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination STAFFRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department rinistrative Conditional Use Permit Approval,Er. ,mental Review, &Variance Staff Report • NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STiiLET • LUA-97 031,ACU,ECF,V REPORT AND DECISION OFApril 15,1997 Page S of 12 B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. T-1, Neighborhood Map (Received March 12, 1997). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. C-1, Topographic Survey (Received March 12, 1997). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. A-0, Overall Site Plan/Tree Plan (Received March 12, 1997). Exhibit No..5: Drawing No. A-1, Site Section/Enlarged.Site.Plan (Received March .12, :1997). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. A-2, Exterior Elevations/Antenna Mounting Plan'(Received March 12, 1997). Exhibit No. 7: Drawing No. E-1,.Electrical Plan(Received March 12, 1997). C. Consistency with Conditional Use Permit Criteria Section 4-31-36 lists .11 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: A. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING CODE& OTHER ORDINANCES: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general'purpose, goals,.objectives.and standard of.the Comprehensive Plan,,the Zoning Ordinance'and any other plan;program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. (1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS AND POLICIES The proposed communication facility is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies. Policy U-1: Utility facilities and services should,be consistent with the growth and development concepts directed by the Comprehensive Plan. The City of Renton's business, industrial, and residential development is growing. The expansion of the Personal Communication System within the City is to ensure that a high quality of service can be offered to the local and regional community. Policy U-4: Strive to protect the health and safety of Renton citizens from recognized harmful effects of utility generated environmental hazards. The applicant states that the radio signals emitted from the PCS antennas do not contain any known health risk to the.public. The applicant further states that the facility does not emit harmful rays, noxious odors, heat, excessive noise, or pollutants. The facility will operate at less than 200 watts of power. This is less than the power rating of most radio and television towers. Policy U-5: Encourage the appropriate siting, construction, operation, and decommissioning of all utility systems in a manner that reasonably minimizes impacts on adjacent land uses. The applicant states that the rooftop site provides the City with excellent coverage and minimizes the impact on adjacent land uses. This site is already used as a cellular site. The new antennas will allow the applicant to increase the level of service without the significant impact of locating a large tower structure on a lot in the adjacent area. STAFFRPT.DOC City ofRenton PB/PWDepartment iinistrative Conditional Use Permit Approval,Ez ?mental Review, &Variance Staff Report NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET LUA-97 031,ACU,ECF,V REPORT AND DECISION OFApril 15,1997 Page 6 of 12 (2) ZONING CODE The project site is zoned RM-N (Multi-Family Residential - Neighborhood). The proposed development will be located a minimum of 61 feet from any property line. This exceeds the minimum setback for this zone. The RM-N zone has a height limit of 30 feet. The applicant has submitted a variance to the height limit. This variance will be discussed in detail later in this report. B. COMMUNITY NEED: There shall be a community need for the..proposed.use at the proposed.location. In the determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall:consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: (1) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. This project does not result in the detrimental over concentration of this use either in the City of Renton or in the immediate area. The Comprehensive Plan calls for the consolidation and co-location of telecommunication facilities. There is already one antenna located on this site. The location of a second antenna on this site-meets the requirement'forthe co-location of facilities. The applicant should provide a diagram demonstrating the service area for this antenna. This information .will. help the City to reach.a conclusion• regarding community.need as future projects are proposed by,the various providers of,this service. The applicant should also provide a.signed statement indicating that they agree to allow for the potential co-location of additional equipment by other providers on the applicant's structure or within the same location. (2) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. According to the applicant, the Nextel ESMR antenna system is designed to serve the entire Puget Sound region. In as much, the system requires a number of antennas to serve not only specific areas, but also that each antenna site be integrated into the regional system. The proposed site would serve Nextel customers in the area. C. EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: (1) LOT COVERAGE Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The RM-N allows for 45% of the project site to be covered by structures. The proposed structures will only cover approximately 0.3% of the subject property. The other existing antenna and the existing single-family residential structure cover considerably less than 45% of the subject property. Therefore, the proposal at this time are consistent with the development standards for this zone. (2) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. As noted, the minimum setback from any property line is approximately 61-feet. The proposal is consistent with the yard requirements for the RM=N zone. STAFFRPT.DOC City of•Renton PB/PW Department iinistrative Conditional Use Permit Approval,E, rmental Review, &Variance Staff Report ' NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH ST .t T LUA-97 031,ACU,ECF,V REPORT AND DECISION OF April 15,1997 Page 7 of 12 3) Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, be/ltowers, public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. As noted, the height of this tower will exceed the height limits for structures in this zone. The applicant.has submitted for a height variance. The variance request will be discussed in detail later in this report. D. COMPATIBILITY: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. (Ord 3599, 1-11-82) Staff believe that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. The residential uses in the adjacent area will be buffered by distance, trees, and topography. E. PARKING: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy-five percent(75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. (Ord.3903, 4-22-85) Only one service vehicle needs to access this type of facility approximately every one to two months. Parking already exists on-site along the roadway that will.provide.access to the tower. No other parking is required for this type of a project. F. TRAFFIC: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the.proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. Once the tower is constructed, traffic will be limited to the occasional service vehicle. Existing roads will be able to accept the anticipated traffic loads. G. NOISE, GLARE: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. As noted by the applicant, the antennas and equipment cabinets will not generate noise, light or glare. The applicant may need to place hazard lights on the monopole and/or antenna structure in accordance with FAA guidelines. These lights are generally low intensity in nature and will not cause a glare problem on the adjacent properties. H. LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The applicant lists landscaping materials they intend to plant in the vicinity of the construction site. However, the applicant has not submitted a landscape plan that demonstrates where the landscaping will be installed or the size of the plant materials that will be used. The applicant will need to submit a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department. 1. ACCESSORY USES: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents,preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. N/A STAFFRPT.DOC City ofRenton PB/PWDepartment 7inistrative Conditional Use Permit Approval,E mental Review, &Variance Staff Report ' NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET LUA-97 031,ACU,ECF,V REPORT AND DECISION OF April15,1997 Page 8 of 12 J. CONVERSION: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. N/A K. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed use.and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements;facilities,utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. Necessary public:improvements already exists at this site. No new:improvements will be required as part of this project. - D. Consistency with Variance Criteria City Code 4-722, G-3: The Board of Adjustment shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination, in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: 1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The:applicant states that due to the nature and type of communication facility proposed, strict application of the height limitations of the RM-N zone would prohibit location on this property. A 120- foot monopole.was deemed required through engineering studies to provide adequate service coverage to Coal Creek Parkway and along SR 900 from 132nd Avenue east to 156th Avenue. Use of a shorter tower would require the location of additional towers in the same area to provide the same coverage as one pole at a height of 120 feet. There is an existing 123-foot monopole 16 feet north of the proposed tower. The applicant believes that this existing tower establishes precedence for height variances within the neighborhood area for this type of structure. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The applicant feels that the proposed facility is similar in size and appearance to other communication facilities in rural areas of Renton. The monopole tower antenna support structure was selected for use because it will facilitate co-location of two wireless telecommunications providers and obviate the need to construct separate, additional towers or monopoles for each provider. This area of Renton will benefit from a reduction in the number of antenna support structures that must be erected. The applicant states that the tower construction will meet or exceed all federal, state and local building code requirements. The development site (45'X 45') will be enclosed with a locked six (6) foot high chainlink fence that will be topped with three strands of barbed wire. The equipment shelter is similar in size and function to a large accessory structure such as a tool shed. In compliance with ordinance requirements, the facility will be landscaped to provide sufficient screening for the facility. The applicants landscape plan includes the following plants: Douglas Fir, Western Red Cedar, Paper Birch, Serviceberry, and Pacific Wax Myrtle. As an additional screening device, the security fencing will.be fitted with wooden slats. The site is located within a wooded area of the central portion-of the subject 1.82 acre parcel. The equipment shelter and much of the lower portion of the tower would be screened in all directions by numerous existing trees, primarily consisting of evergreens such as cedar and fir. STAFFRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department •7inistrative Conditional Use Permit Approval,Er / mental Review, & Variance Staff Report NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET LUA-97 031,ACU,ECF,V REPORT AND DECISION OFApri115,1997 Page 9 of 12 3. That approval shall.not constitute;:a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other_properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: Height variances for monopoles have been granted by the City of Renton on past projects. It also should be noted that there is an existing 123-foot tall monopole 16-feet-from the location of the proposed tower. 4. That the approval as determined by the Board of Adjustment:is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: 'The applicant's engineers have determined(that an antenna'.mounting of 120-feet is required to achieve the necessary coverage for this service area, Coal creekParkway and SR 900 from 132nd Avenue east to 156th Avenue.. Use of a shorter tower on .this,site would require the location of additional towers in the same area to provide the same coverage as one pole at.a height of 120 feet. 2) Request:. The Applicant, Nextel Communications,has requested environmental review, approval for Administrative Conditional Use Permit, and a Variance for Wireless Communication Facility including a base station and a 120 foot monopole with an antenna area for a total height of 134' 8". 3) Administrative Conditional Use: The-applicant's-administrative.conditional'use application complies with,the requirements for information for conditional use. .The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 7. 4) -•Comprehensive Plan:.The.subject proposal is.consistent.with the,Comprehensive.Plan designation of Center Neighborhood. 5) Zoning: .The Conditional.Use as presented, complies with the zoning'requirements and development standards of the RM-N zone. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Multi-Family Residential; East: Single-Family Residential; South: Single-Family Residential; and West: Single-Family Residential. H. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Center Neighborhood; and the Zoning designation of Multi-Family Residential - Neighborhood (RM-N). STAFFRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department iinistrative Conditional Use Permit Approval,Er mental Review, &Variance Staff Report NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH ST , T LUA-97 031,ACU,ECF,V REPORT AND DECISION OFAprit 15,1997 Page 10 of 12 1. Recommendation for Conditional Use Permit The Zoning Administrators Recommend that the Administrative Conditional Use Permit for Nextel Communication Facility of NE 12th Street, File No. LUA-97-031,CU,V be approved subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any permits. This plan shall include the type of plant materials, size'of plant materials, and location of the plant materials. 2. The applicant shall submit a letter of agreement stating that the applicant agrees to allow for the potential co-location of additional Wireless Communication equipment by other providers on the applicant's structure or within the same location; and that the applicant agrees to remove the facility within 6 months after that site's use is discontinued. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. DATE OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ON LAND USE ACTION: April 16, 1997 SIGNATURES: Ja a C. Hanson, Zoning Administrator date Michael .Kattermann,Zoning Administrator date STAFFRPT.DOC City-of Renton PB/PW Department iinistrative Conditional Use Permit Approval,En mental Review, & Variance Staff Report NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE I2TH STALcr,T LUA-97 031,ACU,ECF,V REPORT AND DECISIONOFApri115,1997 Page I1 of 12 J. Decision The Conditional Use Permit and Variance for Nextel Communication Facility of NE 12th Street, File No. LUA- 97-031,CU,V is approved/denied subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. . The applicant shall submit a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any permits. This,plan shall include the type of plant materials, size of plant materials, and location of the plant materials. 2. The applicant shall submit a letter of agreement stating that the applicant agrees to allow for the potential co-location of additional Wireless Communication equipment by other providers on the applicant's structure or within the same location; and that the applicant agrees to remove the facility within 6 months after that site's use is discontinued. TRANSMITTED this 30th day of May, 1997 to the applicant and owner: Robert E. Fricks 1621 Camas Ave. NE Renton, WA 98056 Mary Murdoch Tom Donnelly Nextel Communications 5808 Lake Washington Blvd. Suite 400 Kirkland, WA 98033 TRANSMITTED this 30th day of May, 1997 to the parties of record: TRANSMITTED this 30th day of.May, 1997 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official Bob Arthur,Land Use Inspector Art Larson,Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal STAFFRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment ninistrative Conditional Use Permit Approval,E nmental Review, &Variance StaffReport NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET LUA-97 031,ACU,ECF,V REPORT AND DECISION OFApri115.1997 Page 12 of 12 Environmental Determination Comment and Appeal Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 6, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, errors in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor City of Renton, Development Services Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM May 6, 1997. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. Land Use Decision Reconsideration and Appeal Process APPEAL: The recommendation on the requested Administrative Land Use Action is being made concurrently with the Environmental Determination. The administrative land use recommendation will become final at the Board of Adjustment public hearing if the recommendations not appealed within 15 days of the date of publication. An appeal of the land use recommendation must be filed within the 15 day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). The Environmental Decision will become final if it is not appealed within 15 days of the date of publication. An appeal of the land use decision must be filed within the 15 day appeal period (RCW 43.21,C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680) AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 4-8-11.B, which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5:00 PM on May 6, 1997 for the land use recommendation and 5:00 PM on May 6, 1997 for the Environmental Decision. Any appeal must be accompanied by a$75.00 fee. Specific requirements for the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's office. STAFFRPT.DOC ...... ............................ . ..... . .. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE APRIL 15 1997 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Sam Chastain, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jim Hanson & Mike Kattermann Date Tuesda ril15 �1997 Ting' , Ap Mime: 9:d0 A L'ocatiort: Third Ftoor Car►feterlce Ronm Agenda listed below. Union Plaza Shopping Center(new) (Rosen) LUA-97-034,SA,ECF Proposal for a retail shopping center and offices, consisting of 4 buildings for a total area of 80,496 s.f. with 346 parking spaces. Access would be via two driveway entries off NE 4th Street. Location: 3904 NE 4th Street. Nextel Communication Facility on NE 12th (new) (Powell) LUA-97-031,ECF,ACU,V The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF), Administrative Conditional Use (CU) Permit and a height Variance (V) in order to construct a 138 foot, 6 inch monopole tower in a multi-family residential zone. The project site is located in APA Zone 2. Location: 4715 NE 12th Street. Child & Adult Day Care Zoning & Parking Code (new) (Grueter) LUA-97-037,ECF Environmental Review for proposed amendments to the Center, Commercial and Industrial Zones. The proposed amendments address both child and adult day care zoning and parking code amendments. Minor amendments are needed to provide consistency in how child day care uses are allowed in center and commercial zones. The primary child care amendment would be to allow child day care centers in the Center Neighborhood (CN) zone as a primary permitted use, consistent with allowances in other Center zones. Similar to child day care, adult day care (also known as adult day health) allows for the temporary care of adults who require some assistance or supervision. Adult day care/health typically provides daily supervision, social activities, and health services for elderly or disabled persons. Proposed code amendments would allow adult day care/health uses only in center, commercial, and industrial zones at this time. Adult day care/health uses would be required to comply with similar parking requirements as child day care uses. Streamlining SEPA Process (Discussion) (Huerter) cc: J.Covington,Executive Assistant to the Mayor AGENDA.DOC L.Warren,City Attorney (R) F.Kaufman,Hearing Examiner S.Carlson,Economic Development Director (R) J.Gray,Fire Prevention A.Larson,Fire (R) •• • • ...>..:.....:.::.....:......... ,; ...> ,..: '::; , > > .` < EME; > z<< • • ••NI. •N••GDI•V$OPni= < oima :.::<•:•>:::•:•:•:::>::::>•:::< » ............•..:. :. • • • • • • • • • • • • ..... • F..SEMac E..B. .. On the I>?_ day of - h L , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing E1R�, de "ev (` tams a vtd CJACd tc-S • documents. This information was sent to: • Name • Representing Department of Ecology Dick Anderson Department of Transportation KC Water Pollution Control Metro Department of Wildlife • Larry Fisher Department of Fisheries David Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Sue Rumery City of Seattle Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom, Fisheries Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Rita Perstac Puget Power (Signature of Sender) ¶Lii.cs.. k Se,P,. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) • - 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that DkA signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. , Dated: `7//b J0`1 �/�,( C� /�(,��it.4/ a"' ��.-.s, • NZc4n and : the State of W4'thirlgton--5-- N Notary (Print) Mil -A-RCr JL �� e My appointment expires: 6Iq/q ti 4 r:1fl . Project Name: nescvek f0.Cdi. oh Project Number: -021 , AC—LI , E v • NOTARY.DOC CITE. OF RENTON =II i Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 16, 1997 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on April 22, 1997: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET LUA-97-031,ACU,ECF,V The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional.Use Permit, environmental review, and a height variance in order to construct a 134'8"tall monopole with a 220 square foot utility building for an unmanned communications facility. Structures are normally restricted to a maximum height of thirty (30)feet in the RM-N Zone. Location: 4715 NE 12th Street. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment and appeal period will end at 5:00 PM on May 06, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file is available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. If you have questions, please call me at (206) 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, Mark R. Pyw CP Project ger cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Department of Wildlife Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Sue Rumery, City of Seattle Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power • AGNCYLTR.DOCI 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 �n►_.. . . .... . . . . . 1140 L CITX JF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator April 17, 1997 Mr. Tom Donnelly Matthews Land Company, Inc. do Nextel Communications 5808 Lake Washington Boulevard, Suite#400 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Nextel Communications Project No. LUA-97-031,ACU,ECF,V Dear Mr. Donnelly: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on April 15, 1997, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. _ The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist . and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment and appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on May 06, 1997. Written comments and shall be forwarded to the Development Services Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file is available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal.Building. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(206) 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, Mark R. Pyw CP Project er cc: Ms. Mary Murdoch, Nextel Communications/Applicant Mr. Robert Fricks/Property Owner DNSLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 19)This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer Y� K CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE CONDITIONS AND ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-031,ACU,ECF,V APPLICANT: Nextel Communications PROJECT NAME: Nextel Facility on NE 12th Street DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit, environmental review, and a height-variance, in order to construct a 134' 8" tall monopole with a 220 square foot utility building for an unmanned communications facility. Structures are normally restricted to a maximum height of thirty (30) feet in the RM-N Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4715 NE 12th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. AIRPORT MANAGER 1. The base of the tower is 442.0 feet above sea level. The tower height is 135 feet (including antennas). Total height above sea level will be 577 feet. The tower will be located outside of Airport Conical Surface by approximately 300 feet. The tower antennas will be approximately 198 feet above the 379 foot elevation of the conical surface. This, because of the antenna location, is considered to be significant. 2. A Notice of Proposed Construction should be required to be submitted to the FAA, and received back from the FAA, prior to granting any height variance or building permit. If lighting is required by the FAA, Nextel must be made responsible for the maintenance of the lighting. Conditional Use Permit The Zoning Administrators Recommend that the Administrative Conditional Use Permit for Nextel Communication Facility of NE 12th Street, File No. LUA-97-031,CU,V be approved subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any permits. This plan shall include the type of plant materials, size of plant materials, and location of the plant materials. 2. The applicant shall submit a letter of agreement stating that the applicant agrees to allow for the potential co-location of additional Wireless Communication equipment by other providers on the applicant's structure or within the same location; and that the applicant agrees to remove the facility within 6 months after that site's use is discontinued. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-031,ACU,ECF,V APPLICANT: Nextel Communications PROJECT NAME: Nextel Facility on NE 12th Street DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit, environmental review, and a height variance in order to construct a 134' 8" tall monopole with a 220 square foot utility building for an unmanned communications facility. Structures are normally restricted to a maximum height of thirty (30) feet in the RM- N Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4715 NE 12th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved,the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15)days. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 p.m. on May 06, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division, Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available at the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. PUBLICATION DATE: April 21, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: April 15, 1997 SIGNATURES: ‘9--- o m��� / 5/ 7 Gregg Z}iny'herman,i!kgafiriiptrator DATE DepartrrleIt of Pla g/Building/Public Works Sam Chastain, Administrator D ij/s-79-7 Community Service Department - 4/7O/... ?/// Lee)JIh eler, ire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department Document3 r ` CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE CONDITIONS AND ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-031,ACU,ECF,V APPLICANT: Nextel Communications PROJECT NAME: Nextel Facility on NE 12th Street DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit, environmental review, and a height variance in order to construct a 134' 8" tall monopole with a 220 square foot utility building for an unmanned communications facility. Structures are normally restricted to a maximum height of thirty (30)feet in the RM-N Zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 4715 NE 12th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. AIRPORT MANAGER 1. The base of the tower is 442.0 feet above sea level. The tower height is 135 feet (including antennas). Total height above sea level will be 577 feet. The tower will be located outside of Airport Conical Surface by approximately 300 feet. The tower antennas will be approximately 198 feet above the 379 foot elevation of the conical surface. This, because of the antenna location, is considered to be significant. 2. A Notice of Proposed Construction should be required to be submitted to the FAA, and received back from the FAA, prior to granting any height variance or building permit. If lighting is required by the FAA, Nextel must be made responsible for the maintenance of the lighting. Conditional Use Permit The Zoning Administrators Recommend that the Administrative Conditional Use Permit for Nextel Communication Facility of NE 12th Street, File No. LUA-97-031,CU,V be approved subject to the following conditions: CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any permits. This plan shall include the type of plant materials, size of plant materials, and location of the plant materials. 2. The applicant shall submit a letter of agreement stating that the applicant agrees to allow for the potential co-location of additional Wireless Communication equipment by other providers on the applicant's structure or within the same location; and that the applicant agrees to remove the facility within 6 months after that site's use is discontinued. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL . __ 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 _NOTICE OF EN I�RONMENTAL . DENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal RENTON,WASHINGTON I .The Environmental Review Committee newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language Significance for the following project under continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County • the authority of the Renton Municipal Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper order of the Superior Court of the Code. PP gby P NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS State of Washington for King County. LUA-97-031,ACU,ECF,V The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit, environmental Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers review, and a height variance in order to during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a construct a 134' 8" tall monopole with a . 220 square foot utility building for an unmanned communications facility. Struc- Notice of Environmental Determination ' tures are normally restricted to a maximum , height of thirty(30)feet in the RM-N Zone. on: 4/21/97 Location:4715 NE 12th Street. as publishedThe 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The The full amount of the fee charged for said fore oing publication is the sum of$44.92 , comment and appeal periods for this pro- ject will end at 5:00 PM on May 06, 1997. Legal Number 2829 I Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the pro- ject file is available at the Development . Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal- L al CI k, South CO �t Journal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. y Phone: 235-2550.Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First ����// c Floor,Municipal Building. __Ap. Subscribed and sworn before me on this Say of , 19 7 Published in the South County Journal I April21,1997.2829 _______------ _ LAce ®®�Q J —,,.. , ,, : ,,`:y,,,9 Notary Public of the State of Washington '�' ,\,\�Ss'°!u 6--.°.,,4'�10 residing in Renton o T 'co.:.s 0 King County, Washington o z` A r %tea \, u-- -0 / +o I % ' -un:.0 g L , :. j-oO -9 F o: f Si 0 , r 41`�, W SNP NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS LUA-97-031,ACU,ECF,V The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit, environmental review, and a height variance in order to construct a 134'8"tall monopole with a 220 square foot utility building for an unmanned communications facility. Structures are normally restricted to a maximum height of thirty (30)feet in the RM-N Zone. Location: 4715 NE 12th Street. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment and appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on May 06, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file is available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. Publication Date: APRIL 21, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnspub • NoTim. . . , • . . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION . POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION ' PROJECT NAME: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS . PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-031,ACU,ECF,V • The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit,environmental review,and a height variance in order to construct a 134'8'tall monopole with a 220 square foot utility • building for an unmanned communications facility. Structures are normally restricted to a maximum height of thirty(30)feet in the RM-N Zone. Location:4715 NE 12th Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE I ENVIRONMENT. • AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. ' ® YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MAY 06,1997 OR PPEA - • THIS DETERMINATION BY 5.00 PM,MAY 06,1997.. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. ' I . n �•��."'�''�,�___- _milWit. } } i • 2p_---- t(fl ' 1'LAQ er•IEATRF i FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I • Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. I . CERTIFICATION . . It �,1i n JGCGlitiSCIY1 . hereby certify that 3 copies-of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on A-prlI I19, iq°Iri Signed:_gaL#icLU�-, 9 Laz,%Y1 . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS . . . COUNTY OF KING • ) ��"'' I certify that' I know or have satisfactory evidence that by > l� rR1„.'`,s: signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and iot�Ot,.`r ta" 4¢j the, uses - and purposes mentioned in the instrument. , V. :' o.,. : ~ Dated: y `7 �ti� •1 A �. .- Notary Pu IC in an f r the State-iif'Wasbinglon Notary (Print) 11AR�r/1'2ET 3: rGt_LLA-2 My appointment-expires: '/6 /4'i - NOTARY.00C NOfiQE - ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-031,ACU,ECF,V The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit, environmental review, and a height variance in order to construct a 134' 8" tall monopole with a 220 square foot utility building for an unmanned communications facility. Structures are normally restricted to a maximum height of thirty(30)feet in the RM-N Zone. Location: 4715 NE 12th Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON MAY 06, 1997 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, MAY 06, 1997.. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. 'zJHs�t' CENTRAL , ,4 HIGHLANDS PLAZA;• 6 .p o'd1a os•.c� a• I:1 is :Iv I ©tee° •4 t• �x.n .:sw-n T7E1:lY T m0.,c iv�e..n ypt. ' - • I• ...- • ".. ` 0 —n a .33 _ t 1:_ II a """' l'W "'" ,��n , I II ZCUWeJ EucN.a ®(N a 0, -j� FEwa•,N ® NT. OF'SEATTL'EY :` • gt ING.7ERLT' NeighborhoodDehYDlia _... FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION.AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Iude°the ro ect:NUMBER When'callin for. re:.er.:file;dentifcation:>:::<:; <:; !>>< ;::. Please.me . P 1. . .... . .� p...P; ..:..:..>:.. .. ,.::... APR-09-1997 15:10 MATTHEIWIS LAND CO. INC. 5098389888 P.02 /11V111 MATFHEWS. 4t. 61, Land Company April 8, 1997 Mr:Mark Pywell Planning/Building/Public Works Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 RE: Nextel Communications Project No. LUA-97-031,ECF,CU,V Dear Mr_ Pywell: Please be advised that the telecommunications facility proposed for construction at 4715 NE 12th Street,Renton, is scheduled to be a monopole structure. The site plans that were submitted with our application for this project are correct,however any other text reference to a lattice tower should be changed to reflect a monopole structure. Also,please note for your files that as of April 7 the office of Matthews Land Company moved to a new location in the city of Bellevue. Our new address and phone number is shown below. Any communications and inquiries may be addressed to my attention at this new location. Matthews Land Company 50 116'h Avenue NE, Suite 120 Bellevue,WA 98004 Phone: (206)453-9500 Fax: (206)453-9905 We apologize for any inconvenience that these changes may cause. Sincerely, ,4 Tom Donnelly Land Consultant Matthews Land Company,Inc. • 421 W.Riverside,Suite 605 • Spokane.Washington 99201 • 509.838.9500 • Fax: 509-838.9888 APR-08-1997 15:09 MATTHEWS LAND CO. INC. 5098389888 P.01 • /1E114 MATTHEWS Land Company �EVEOPMENTPIO�N�NG RR CI FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION SHE EL 194 D 4 i TO: fIF,-I 4iw // DATE: e .y 2)/97 FIRM: C/ r (.if Td&" FAX: ig067,0 77-- S/9s FROM: �/rsc.I7orr/yG/l�/ This transmittal contains page(s) including this page. If you did not receive all of the pages shown above, please contact me at your earliest convenience at DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS: t ,�.�/` • COMMENTS: SIGNED: HARD COPY TO FOLLOW BY: ©Regular Mail Overnight Service ® Certified Mail Hand Delivery [] Other • ae.17/tOt96 • City-or'Renton Department of Planning/Building/ruoiic Works ' ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �tI.C.,e. • COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 7, 1997 'APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-031,ECF,CU,V DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 24, 1997 APPLICANT: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET WORK ORDER NO: 78192 LOCATION: 4715 NE.12th Street SITE AREA: 45'X 45' I BUILDING AREA(gross): 220 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administrative Conditional Use(CU) permit and a height Variance(V) in order to construct a 138 foot, 6 inch monopole tower in a multi-family residential zone. Project - site is located in APA Zone 2. • A. -ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable • Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment ' Minor Major Information • Impacts Impacts Necessary . impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation . Land/Shoreline Use Utilities • Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services V Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet d a,dd ,,I2t alikelt_el Ail Me- h_a_vy ykk.,,,,, a,,,2_,,/ 44 gle a_-e o-72 loyo 5/ Me_. • G �c� � ' /2C / ..CJC / 2- �/z///2 j Oh-ad1 e"—L1>< 100(.._,& t ae/2 1,712./26,e, 7 B. POLICY-RELATED.COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to th se areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio l information is needed to properly assess thi oposaL Signature of rector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • re CITY OF RENTON \-CQ,N ON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTM0F °FP�� MEMORANDUM DATE: APRIL 8, 1997 TO: MARK PYWELL FROM: NEIL WATTS /\J(.(i{J SUBJECT: NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE I have reviewed the proposed construction of a 138 foot 6 inch monopole tower at 4715 NE 12th Street and have the following comments. The proposed location meets the general intent of collocation by installing the monopole adjacent to an existing monopole of similar height. There appears to be no adverse impacts to this proposal on the water, sewer, drainage or street systems. We are currently working on a draft copy of a wireless communications ordinance for the City. This draft ordinance would allow monopoles up to the 35 feet higher than the permitted height in this zone (MR) or 150 feet (whichever is less) with a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. A variance would be required for any additional height. The draft ordinance would require additional submittal information that was not provided for this proposal. Missing items include: • A diagram or map showing the viewshed of the proposed facility. • Photosimulations of the proposed facility from effected residential properties and public rights-of-way at varying distances. • A map showing the service area of the proposed WCF and an explanation of the need for that facility. • A site/landscaping plan showing the specific placement of the WCF on the site; showing the location of existing structures, trees, and other significant site features; and indicating type and locations of plant materials used to screen WCF components and the proposed color(s) for the WCF. • A signed statement indicating: APRIL 8, 1997 PAGE 2 1. The applicant agrees to allow for the potential co-location of additional WCF equipment by other providers on the applicant's structure or within the same site location; and 2. That the applicant agrees to remove the facility within 6 months after that site's use is discontinued. • A lease agreement with the landholder that: 1. Allows the landholder to enter into leases with other providers; and 2. Specifies that if the provider fails to remove the facility upon 6 months of its discontinued use, the responsibility for removal falls upon the landholder. Other conditions listed in the draft ordinance are as follows: • The shelter or cabinet used to house radio electronics equipment and the associated cabling connecting the equipment shelter or cabinet to the Monopole II Facility support structure shall be concealed, screened, camouflaged or placed underground. • Monopole II Facilities shall be landscaped in conformance with City Code Section 4-31-34, Landscaping. A minimum landscaping area of fifteen (15) feet shall be required surrounding the facility. Landscaping shall include trees, shrubs and ground cover. • No equipment shall be operated so as to produce noise in levels above 45 dB as measured from the nearest property line on which the attached wireless communication facility is located. • A wireless communications facility or attached wireless communications facility shall be removed by the facility owner within 6 months of the date it ceases to be operational or if the facility falls into disrepair. • The applicant shall comply with Federal standards for radio frequency emissions. Within six months after the issuance of its operational permit, the applicant shall submit a project implementation report which provides cumulative field measurements of radio frequency emissions of all antennas installed at the subject site and compares the results with established Federal standards. Said report shall be subject to review and approval of the Administrator for consistency with Federal standards. If on review, the City finds that the WCF does not meet Federal standards, the City may revoke or modify this permit. • The applicant shall ensure that the WCF will not cause localized interference with the reception of area television or radio broadcasts. If on review the City finds that the WCF interferes with such reception, and if such interference is not cured within sixty (60) days, the city may revoke or modify this permit. You may find many of these draft code requirements to be appropriate condition requirements for this proposal. I recommend as a minimum conditioning approval of this request to comply with collocation support for future antennas. The new telecommunications support structure should be engineered, designed and constructed to accommodate the antenna array of a least two additional telecommunications companies. The applicant should submit a proposal detailing how subsequent • APRIL 8, 1997 PAGE 3 applicants will attach to the new structure. This may include diagrams noting where a future antenna array would attach, relevant engineering specifications and a site plan showing the future placement of ground support equipment cabinets. The number of ground based sites should match the number of antenna array that can be accommodated. H///planreview/nextel RENTON FIRE DEPT City or Kenton Department of Planning/Building/Pump Works pp �1 ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE'19D�" gkE.7' • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ric_C Pe1Jr.urn COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 7, 1997 �' ° 9 V LD APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-031,ECF,CU,V DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 24,.1997 APPLICANT: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET WORK ORDER NO: 78192 LOCATION: 4715 NE 12th Street SITE AREA: 45'X 45' I BUILDING AREA(gross): 220 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administrative Conditional Use(CU) permit and a height Variance(V) in order to construct a 138 foot, 6 inch monopole tower in a multi-family residential zone. Project site is located in APA Zone 2. • A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ • Historic/Cultural Natural Resources _ Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet ,�/ 14,000 Feet 0447‹ /0617C V / • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS NA ,We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where add'iona!information is ded to properly assess this proposal. s/ac/97 Signdtu of Director or Authorized R presentative Date DEVA .DOC Rev.10/93 • City ; `!enton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:—TToAaihUV\ COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 7, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-031,ECF,CU,V DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 24, 1997 APPLICANT: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET WORK ORDER NO: 78192 • 42"YY LOCATION: 4715 NE 12th Street �« �i'�,4.,a SITE AREA: 45'X 45' I BUILDING AREA(gross): 220 Sq.Ft. lif4P SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administr4Conditional'Ug U) permit and a height Variance(V) in order to construct a 138 foot, 6 inch monopole tower in a multi-family resrd tial zone. f i ct site is located in APA Zone 2. e� • A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information •Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals . • Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources • Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14;000 Feet • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS IUo aaditIt'uu( I4 / 11/113 —duo t J44► � 7~yu.Lcoyi ate. ve ✓✓df C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ste S.eP a✓ktt 121c*,o We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas ofprobable impact or areas P P where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • City Fenton Department of Planning/Building/Putilic Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: . 1 1 " i COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 7, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-031,ECF,CU,V DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 24, 1997 APPLICANT: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: MARK.PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET WORK ORDER NO: .78192 LOCATION: 4715 NE 12th Street erne SITE AREA: 45'X 45' BUILDING AREA(gross): 220 Sq.Ft. O.p SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administrative C. i.ional Use(CU) permit and a height Variance(V) in order to construct a 138 foot, 6 inch monopole tower in a multi-family residen i zcin . Project ' site is located in APA Zone 2. �4��� Sibf997 b A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities _ Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS See sefuhaZ wte 4t p , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. � ' l 11A/ 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 RENTON FIRE DEPT City or Kenton Department of Planning/Building/Puonc Works F' r-MJ ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET MAR 2 5 1997 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ran RG1iCW— WartirCOMMENTS DUE: APRIL 7, 1927 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-031,ECF,CU,V DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 24, 1'9 i V CU APPLICANT: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET WORK ORDER NO: 78192 LOCATION: 4715 NE 12th Street • SITE AREA: 45'X 45' BUILDING AREA(gross): 220 Sq.Ft. CITY OF RE-WON • SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF),.an Administr,y' / tonal Use(CU) permit and a height Variance(V) in order to construct a 138 foot, 6 inch monopole tower in a multi-family tesideritia zone. Project site is located in APA Zone 2. t` ;' 2 6 1997• • Isw11u.0rV1vet 1.01v11Q1L/01 A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT.(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary • Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _Water _ Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health • Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • • • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • S-@C. -Me w 0 . • • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is eeded to properly assess this proposal. 7 4/0/1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City orilenton Department of Planning/Building/1 w. Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Airpo k COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 7, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-031,ECF,CU,V DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 24, 1997 APPLICANT: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET WORK ORDER NO: 78192 LOCATION: 4715 NE 12th Street SITE AREA: 45'X 45' BUILDING AREA(gross): 220 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administrative Conditional Use(CU) permit and a height Variance(V) in order to construct a 138 foot, 6 inch monopole tower in a multi-family residential zone. Project site is located in APA Zone 2. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth ✓ — — Housing Air ✓ Aesthetics ✓ Water ✓ LighVGlare Plants • ✓, Recreation ✓ Land/Shoreline_Use _ ✓ Utilities Animals t✓ Transportation ✓ Environmental Health Public Services ✓ / Energy/ Historic/Cultural ✓ Natural Resources ✓ Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet V 13A56 oP ?owER. L5 442.0' ltt$oua 5£4 6P.VEt, Tow£Q iJti JIr is 635/ Niel- AurciN4) agovE 5t4 LEVEL. 7OTAL NE/'/JP /,5 577. Aeolis 5EA LgL'$L. 70WF2 /S LcCAaD JusT OUTSIDE of Al2PDAT CONICAL 3ueeC,4Cg, ay ,tPD.QO PR 74B 7t0i i 4/ ANPiINAs AQL ly'g Fein 4801E 7WF- 37f/ €LEi/A4T101y ©P roe coNeAc- .504A . TNIS,, SeCAvsl oSt Tic/E ANTE'N/IA 4-oG4i/0N, ,5 coeVril0Egib D<6NeFladNT. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS A NOti eS op ,eDAc20 C6R zTevc7loa/ zwoot•D Be_ kezpotaf..0 To sra isoak6oisd To 76.1e MA, AiV.O 2 EIV D iladiZ ram rim. ci4A, P w aQ4ivrtma Am) .Jg/6p r llAalA CE d"Dl ae_ B4,0G ,WPM(T /F LicAmmG 15 c utgED 67 FAA, NE-)TFL IY0S 6 E- /t(ADE RezAbN5/81-,E i02 N,4/NT /ANCE a,o LIGAJ7/MG- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ?WE APPLILcomr JELS $ A 6Jfi itr otiamwCE, EfC 4U$L oir- WM- ycb Poor NEWT- 4600E ? l&CCKrc'At- 50264611-, AhD 173 PQOy!lnt6TY ?o ..3E S'�, A jZOo1,E ABor/,E wfr4tOsi drieee4P7 20oT11/eLY FLY, i ME UACIA141Ce 5/40v4P BE. p@Qx17TE.p ILY Arlin.%n. PJC'F/Pr P20/ TfJE FAA O F d DETEQ/t IN4 TION Tfl4 fT rile_ Towel- is &r . oBjr&vcTIon/ o . u4tAeD 70 Ark. NAVICiATlodi, 4/c c,7tNt P€Q r.2i Ne/C%EL MI'sT BE &VowS/6a roe /VA/XTEAdi MC',e- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information i sneeded to properly assess this proposal. / Gam- 27, Signatur> • Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.r•• Rev.10/93 „ / ,-- ,9'_ ===-==__==-=======--=----=--==_ F ---)i-=-=-_,.,, _�V ====--=== == I l_aunY1L_lilt_ l_sL xJ 0Sil r19 ` 112---Li ---- -::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::---f:,,::::-:-_--_-- J , 1E-_ ---------------- A a _______________ __ ________ ___ ________ .. _ - ____________ _ •--t -------------—-- , . 7 Irv!!! r _:::__:::::::::_E:3:::::::::::.;::_:::::-_-_-:::4411tkiti Lin + V#=-- ORE 4_=_=_ rirm r.::::::::,:-,-,,,:::::„_:_:, __:::::::::::::::„,„:::::,„,::,:„,::,_ D � • �s .'-''.'''—•\\.. qn --2-:-::-:--:::::::-f-:-_-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-_:_-:-:-.7-_-:-:-:-:::::::::__ .j fi. -:-:-::::::::::::::::::::::::::_:_:_p ,/41 - 7gri .,,t; . _______________ •,,,. ..7 40;00 ' :::::E:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_'4, F !/ . is i>›,..'-'11)-':a:EE:::--:::E:3::--7::::::;K:E:38::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::__:_ .....::-:-:::::::-----_-:-E-H:::::.:;E::__rat . ._ __ ei,.. . \r,',... , . ‘,--' ,,.g:E:-::::--:_:-::::-:::::**s]-1s=--::•=zE?-45:::_f*::_=::_;-:_::::::_-_-_f:::_;ZEE:__=_::::-:::::-:_-__-,-_-:E:::-:_:_::E___ j _a:.:F.:_-_-_--7_-_3:._,-----__:__::.:32-:]=3-„E_:_E=_EEEE.7.E.E=_:._:_:_:_-_:-.1::25- ardiz:,7 i --,, ,x . . Ai! ,... 1 1 i -_----_-:_-:_=:_=:-_:::K:3--_::::::-=_-:-:_-::::::::::::-_-fn:::::::::::::--_--_-:::::::::::::::::::::::::EtE:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:3:::::::::.- _ 1 _.aziTimArri glizawi,,,, -crrr.-./ 1` Iiiivp... II 13,111 MIMI ,,. ._,_ , i.e e _ ®�,`T i I”" J r y . e ==-==============____==-=_ _:=-=====-====-====-===_ _NI`=ram, l% Irmo �_ 1, `� ___ - _ _ __ ___________ Irian .��� ;ova®� , _____========_J= --=--- ========= _ ====_ ' .,1 •-• --J'` "VI ply moo- I—L., _illiti, ...,rrtu n,� - .... o�kji i �� ====___-____=__============= =-= =-- iJI CAI lit,, . ___73:11:77-..; WIrjejWiii., AI I. --1�.JL� 1 � � at,�`,1(1�\�Q ' �`'�. -_== _—_====-r==-==r__ -___ ==_ __ Awl [11 11-p-- n ��. u` � � �._M ._ 7-b,,„,,p xr. i , hbc1 did o i . . 1 - :-;- - pLs_=JI 1 arc tons_DL,..1 [ , -- . ' . ' ...v L] ==� �, wt.' � � 'Q��/� p� \.q i jAMIL‘1144. [ii;t1111E111111 a Ku C = 12. I.� �� O II•. ©S ` \ arcia.r. +_,,,.. ei L ,......_, i - ? d �I 1 I 9 B s . ■ 1 11 'r fIT.9 ___ ©I • V i ill.,� 1 �_. I Qpp __\JJ 1 �� 1 106-11n17M" gic sol_ II �r �1.F1 I_l lu, Q x ' •'n s 1 „: � * .o ° •-•D .,,t,,n�n l®n EE � rein Try ..vio 11_ `� ;� �I�.ti C=7I III►lam .. -1 •, x - 1+14n-� T'•..�®41 �1. d-1 M City or Venton Department of Planning/Building/Paolo Works ' ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:CAhZtcrs COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 7, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-031,ECF,CU,V DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 24, 1997 r'fYy,..1 APPLICANT: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL ,•�� 4� PROJECT TITLE: NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET WORK ORDER NO: 78192 ;.%' 5 1997LOCATION: 4715 NE 12th Street „rr� 'SITE AREA: 45'X 45' L BUILDING AREA(gross): 220 Sq.Ft. `'•� 'l� ����`,,, � SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administrative Conditional Use(CU) permit and a height Variance(V) in order to construct a 138 foot, 6 inch monopole tower in a multi-family residential zone. Project site is located in APA Zone 2. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation • Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • 106 ‘el • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS M‘ We vp a+wed this a••ic-tion with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh r .•,diron.• I f• , a • n-eded to properly assess this proposal. lI( / / 2-2 ? 17 Sig .• re of Director or Authorized Representative Date DE APP.DOC Rev.10/93 City or'Renton Department of Planning/Building/Huo"ilc Works ENVIRONMENTAL. & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1 COMMENTS DUE:. APRIL 7, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-031,ECF,CU,V DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 24, 1997 APPLICANT: NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET WORK ORDER NO: 78192 LOCATION: 4715 NE 12th Street SITE AREA: 45'X 45' I BUILDING AREA(gross): 220 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF), an Administrative Conditional Use(CU) permit and a height Variance(V) in order to construct a 138 foot, 6 inch monopole tower in a multi-family residential zone. Project site is located in APA Zone 2. A. ENVIRONMENTAL.IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health _ Public Services Energy/ - Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 41.2„4"colAk `7"a • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 414,t0A,c_ 11,0 07-e) • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property asses this proposal. C9Jft7 Signature of Direct r or Authorized Representative D e DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 .:.:EV ...:: :..: :....:.. .... ELOP..MEN.T.,:.SERVtEES::..:::..: EPROPERTYKOWNERSIsm 1LISP.:::0P.::SURDFUND[N ............................. within300.;feet.,...::,........ . 1....::.................. ....... ........ .... ...._ ' PROJECT NAME: Nextel Communicatons Transceiving Facility Hi gh1 ands/Ha zen (WA0111-2) APPLICATION NO: 91 - 031 AGV, V ) E The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. .The Development Services`Division will notify these individuals of the proposed-development. Owner Name Site Address Parcel Number Renton School Dist 403 *No Site Address* Renton 102305 9077 05 Steger Robert C 11220 137th Ave SE Rento 102305 9096 02 • Greggs Janice K 11256 137th Ave SE Rento 102305 9124 08 Fleming Michael E 11212 137th Ave SE Rento 102305 9173 08 j.Keitzman Charles N Sr 11238 137th Ave SE Rento 102305 9249_ 08 Renton School Dist 403 *No Site Address* Renton 102305 9277 03 Renton School Dist 403 1101 Hoquiam Ave NE Rent 102305 9278 02 Renton School Dist 403 1101 Hoquiam Ave NE Rent 102305 9278 - 02 Renton School Dist 403 1101 Hoquiam Ave NE Rent 102305 9278 02 Renton School Dist 403 1101 Hoquiam Ave NE Rent 102305 9278 02 Renton Highland Jehov 11205 138th Ave SE Rento 102305 9378 01 • Sutherland Associates *No Site Address* Renton 149450 0030 04 Sutherland Associates 4601 NE Sunset Blvd Rent 149450 0050 09 Renton School Dist 403 *No Site Address* Renton 516970 0073 0.3 U.S.A.West Apt.Fund 1332 Duvall Ave NE Rento 516970 0075 01 U.S.A.West Apt.Fund 1332 Duvall Ave NE Rento 516970 0075 01 Zimmerman Mark E :; '4600?'NE-12th St Renton 9 . • 516970 0094 08 Chun Randall King Beu ;. '4628rNE:12.th St Renton 9 516970 0095 07 • • • • • • • • • • (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) • •0 • (Continued) • • II NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER II • • • III li • ip Applicant Certification I,/T lD'i°-l�ia.(�' 47- ,hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property • (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: . ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records Title Company Records • ❑ King my ssessors Records • Signed Date f//O pplicant) NOTARY ��s%••\‘‘‘‘` �. SEti ATTESTED: Subscrib d and sworn before me, a Notary I? 114 ,4-q74 �t�the State of Washington, residing at .1j.IP � on the /d ' S �y", +� , 1977. 7. _ . `re ' Signed �� :v `1` t'�• � °= Z i II (Notary Public) SOq C.t '4 to ... ...........:..:}::::v::::::x::::nv::;:;:::::.....:.v::nv.::v:nv::A:.v::::::::::::::::::::::.. w:::::::::nv.:. ?!L:jn::}:??•}i}}:tiii:•iii.`iii>i}:"i:•:•}::y}:iYfi�? jS:�Y:•i'rii}S:�Yii:i::>`r,:: I RT��.�•I��'4T���F..0. ..ION';:.::::.:.....;:.k:?.:;;}:??..?.;::}::.. ' ;:'�?�� �<s': ':»'.>`>�>':>'>:':s::::::::»>:�::#::: <:•'•:::�:�:>?:::'>`':::':�::?>'::::::s ..:..::::::::::.:....:........................::?w::::::..;............:v.v::::::::::.:v::::::::.:::n.:::.::::n:.::::::::..n::::::::::::::.. v::::v::::w::::.v:.:}}}}:?{?}}}i}:•}}:::i}}i}k::i::':.}::::::..:.?.}}}:•;?.}:??.' ..............:::::•.:::::::::;..........................,:..::::::::.;.........................:.::::::wn:w::nv,v;;..:.....................::}}}i}::•:}i}i::.v:::vnv::...:::::.........................:�.::n; .... r.•}:::• :....:......::: .ea.ch:€lIgted::> .roe . ll.WO.er..:::on:::::: ......a...:.• :::::::.::'..::::,11,1:..........:..:.:....:....:.::::.::1111 .:.::1.11 1111:::::::11111:::::•::::11ii:::::.f:giii::::::::::.......... ... :v.v.v:::::::::::::::W}}}ii}}:•}:?q}}:4}}}i}}:is4:•i}}::::.�::::::..:::::::.::::::::::::::::::::iiii�::::iiiiiiiii?j}:v!4iiii:v?i`ii>:ii::ii?;:ji:::;{:i>$?iTj:::<:ji::::i:>^iij •::::::v.v:i:nv}:}}:}}}}}::.i':.:<???::::?:gv.vnv:::•:::•}:::::::.}'::{?:::::: :.}v:n'::.}'?::::.r::::::::::::::::?.:i:•.v::::::.�::?: :':?;i>:5:::}}•:"�ii?::�::ii:;}:;}'.{JY:rii'k}iS is ii:;i:;i:;; i•;v: :}Si:;:;::^:?4?}i}iSyy:•iiisr;?{•JJij«:?'4ij::?}:O}}::d:•i:ii::;:?v. .....g.......:. ��� ............................................................::::::.::.:............ OTa•� 6 ^}}}}}:•i:?4:!}ii:?}}}}:�:i:ii:::ii Lvt::L:::i:::f:i:v:ir v:LY:i:�i::i::;:ii:titi4';:?'iii:::ii::i::i::::ii:`i::::::::?:::'l:::iiii:�iiii:i::::i::Lji:L>:'ii:::�::i:ti?isi�?isSt::t:ii::::::i:?::`y}::i::ii`i'iii;i:i:Si :. ,.•..•,?}.:,S.:•};.;?Sus Abed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, d forth. State::;o :W�: ton:::::::::::::::::: '`gin listprop.doc / lr//4/9 REV 07/95 2 MetroScan / King (WA) Parcel Number Owner Name Site Address YB Owner Phone 102305 9077 05 Renton School Dist 403 *No Site Address* Renton 206-204-2350 102305 9096 02 Steger Robert C 11220 137th Ave SE Rento 1952 206-226-4033 102305 9124 08 Greggs Janice K 11256 137th Ave SE Rento 1947 206-226-8002 102305 9173 08 Fleming Michael E 11212 137th Ave SE Rento 1962 206-226-3872 . 102305 9249 08 Keitzman Charles N Sr 11238 137th Ave SE Rento 102305 9277 03 Renton School Dist 403 *No Site Address* Renton 206-204-2350 102305 9278 02 Renton School Dist 403 1101 Hoquiam Ave NE Rent 1969 ' 206-204-2350 102305 9278 02 Renton School Dist 403 1101 Hoquiam Ave NE Rent 1969 206-204-2350 102305 9278 02 Renton School Dist 403 1101 Hoquiam Ave NE Rent 1969 206-204-2350 102305 9278 02 Renton School Dist 403 1101 Hoquiam Ave NE Rent 1969 206-204-2350 102305 9378 01 Renton Highland Jehov 11205 138th Ave SE Rento 1972 149450 0030 04 Sutherland Associates *No Site Address* Renton 1979 149450 0050 09 Sutherland Associates 4601 NE Sunset Blvd Rent 516970 0073 ,03 Renton School Dist 403 *No Site Address* Renton 206-204-2350 516970 0075 01 U.S.A.West Apt.Fund 1332 Duvall Ave NE Rento 1989 516970 0075 01 U.S.A.West Apt.Fund 1332 Duvall Ave NE Rento 516970 0094 08 Zimmerman Mark E 4600 NE 12th St Renton 9 1981 206-235-2186 516970 0095 07 Chun Randall King Beu 4628 NE 12th St Renton 9 1981 • • • • • • • • • • The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE 10801 Main Street,Suite 115 Bellevue Wa.98004 (206)646-4155 (206)453-6805 Fax http://pnwt.com PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY:Jennifer Albright DATE :02/26/97 TIME :15:50:49 REPORT:FARM.RPW COUNT :18 FAX NUMBER: PAGES SENT: REMEMBER PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE WHEN PLACING YOUR TITLE ORDERS We Changed Our Name For All The Right Reasons! Search Parameters Parcel Number. . .18 102305 9378 102305 9173 102305 9096 102305 9249 102305 9124 102305 9277 102305 9077 149450 0030 149450 0050 516970 0094 516970 0095 RECEIVE 516970 0073 516970 0075 102305 9278 co.I 1 2 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON * ` --. MetroScan / King - * ' , Owner :Renton School Dist vv., Parcel # :102305 9077 05 Site :*No Site Address* Renton Sale Date : Mail ' :435 Main Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$140,000 Lgl :STR 102305 TAXLOT 77 N 1/2 OF E Q:NW S:10 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:7.36 YB: Ph:206-204-2350 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Steger Robert C Parcel # :102305 9096 02 Site :11220 137th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :11220 137th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$103,500 Lgl :STR 102305 TAXLOT 96 NE 1/4 OF NW Q:NW . S:10 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 B1dgSF:1,110 Ac: .75 YB:1952 Ph:206-226-4033 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Greggs Janice K Parcel # :102305 9124 08 Site :11256 137th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :06/07/96 Mail :8721 116th Ave SE Newcastle Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$86,200 Lgl :STR 102305 TAXLOT 124 S 130 FT OF Q:NW S:10 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:810 Ac: .76 YB:1947 Ph:206-226-8002 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Fleming Michael E Parcel # :102305 9173 08 Site :11212 137th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date :09/30/94 Mail :11212 137th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$118,000 Lgl :STR 102305 TAXLOT 173 S 125 FT OF Q:NW S:10 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/1 / Stories:1 B1dgSF:1,460 Ac: .40 YB:1962 Ph:206-226-3872 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Keitzman Charles N Sr Parcel # :102305 9249 08 Site :11238 137th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :11238 137th Ave SE Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price . Use :901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$87,779 Lgl :STR 102305 TAXLOT 249 PP ACT Q:NW S:10 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:1.37 YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Renton School Dist 403 Parcel # :102305 9277 03 Site :*No Site Address* Renton Sale Date . Mail :435 Main Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$72,500 Lgl :STR 102305 TAXLOT 277 W 1/2 OF NE Q:NW S:10 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:2.54 YB: Ph:206-204-2350 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Renton School Dist 403 Parcel # :102305 9278 02 Site :1101 Hoquiam Ave NE Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :435 Main Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :426 Pub,Schools,Public Asd.V :$11,620,600 Lgl :STR 102305 TAXLOT 278 N 1/2 OF NW Q:NE S:10 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:24,024 Ac:4.10. YB:1969 Ph:206-204-2350 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Renton School Dist 403 Parcel # :102305 9278 02 Site :1101 Hoquiam Ave NE Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :435 Main Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :426 Pub,Schools,Public Asd.V :$11,620,600 Lgl :STR 102305 TAXLOT 278 N 1/2 OF NW Q:NE S:10 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:67,865 Ac:4.10 YB:1969 Ph:206-204-2350 * MetroScan / Ring * Owner :Renton School Dist 403 Parcel # :102305 9278 02 Site :1101 Hoquiam Ave NE Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :435 Main Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :426 Pub,Schools,Public Asd.V :$11, 620,600 Lgl :STR 102305 TAXLOT 278 N 1/2 OF NW Q:NE S:10 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:46,870 Ac:4.10 YB:1969 Ph:206-204-2350 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. *. ; -. MetroScan / King :- - * Owner :Renton School Dist 403 Parcel # :102305 9278 02 Site :1101 Hoquiam Ave NE Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :435 Main Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :426 Pub,Schools,Public Asd.V :$11,620,600 Lgl :STR 102305 TAXLOT 278 N 1/2 OF NW Q:NE S:10 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:]. BldgSF:32,032 Ac:4.10 YB:1969 Ph:206-204-2350 * MetroScan / Ring * . Owner :Renton Highland Jehov With Parcel # :102305 9378 01 Site :11205 138th Ave SE Renton 98059 Sale Date . Mail :PO Box 2276 Renton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use :407 Pub,Church,Religious Services Asd.V :$185,100 Lgl :STR 102305 TAXLOT 378 S 200 FT OF Q:NW S:10 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:]. BldgSF:3,940 Az: YB:1972 Ph: * * • Metro Scan / King Owner :Sutherland Associates Parcel # :149450 0030 04 Site :*No Site Address* Renton Sale Date :05/09/96 Mail :1585 Broadway New York Ny 10036 Sale Price . Use :433 Pub,Supermarket,Less Than 30k Sqft Asd.V :$1,191,200 Lgl :LOT 3 CENTRAL HIGHLANDS PLAZA-BSP Q:SW S:03 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:]. BldgSF:33,340 Ac: .97 YB:1979 Ph: * ▪ MetroScan / King * Owner :Sutherland Associates Parcel # :149450 0050 09 • Site :4601 NE Sunset Blvd Renton 98059 Sale Date :05/09/96 Mail :1585 Broadway New York Ny 10036 Sale Price . Use :401 Pub,Parking,Associated Asd.V :$1,904,800 Lgl :LOT 5 CENTRAL HIGHLANDS PLAZA-BSP Q:SW S:03 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:5.40 YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Renton School Dist 403 Parcel # :516970 0073 03 Site :*No Site Address* Renton Sale Date . Mail :435 Main Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$90,000 Lgl :LOT 6 MARSHALL JOS P TRS S 530 FT Q:SW S:03 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:4.02 YB: Ph:206-204-2350 * MetroScan / King * Owner :U.S.A.West Apt.Fund Parcel # :516970 0075 01 Site :1332 Duvall Ave NE Renton 98059 Sale Date :03/13/90 Mail :5820 Miramar Rd #200 San Diego Ca 92121 Sale Price :$3,734,000 Use :113 Res,Apartment,50 To 99 Units Asd.V :$3,540,300 Lgl :LOT 7 MARSHALL JOS P TRS LESS CO Q:SW 5:03 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:2 BldgSF:73,317 Ac: .43 YB:1989 Ph: * MetroScan / King * • Owner :U.S.A.West Apt.Fund Parcel # :516970 0075 01 Site :1332 Duvall Ave NE Renton 98059 Sale Date :03/13/90 Mail :5820 Miramar Rd #200 San Diego Ca 92121 Sale Price :$3,734,000 Use :113 Res,Apartment,50 To 99 Units Asd.V :$3,540,300 • Lgl :LOT 7 MARSHALL JOS P TRS LESS CO Q:SW S:03 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .41 YB: Ph: . * MetroScan / Ring * Owner :Zimmerman Mark E Parcel # :516970 0094 08 Site :4600 NE 12th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :08/01/90 Mail :4600 NE 12th St #1 Renton Wa 98059 Sale Price :$195,000 Full Use :104 Res,Fourplex Asd.V :$195,000 Lgl :LOT 8 MARSHALL JOS P TRS LOT 3 OF Q:SW S:03 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:2 BldgSF:3,268 Ac: .36 YB:1981 Ph:206-235-2186 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Chun Randall King Beu & Eva T Parcel # :516970 0095 07 Site :4628 NE 12th St Renton 98059 Sale Date :03/21/94 Mail :17024 160th Ave SE Renton Wa 98058 Sale Price . Use :104 Res,Fourplex Asd.V :$195,000 Lgl :LOT 8 MARSHALL JOS P TRS LOT 4 OF Q:SW S:03 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:2 BldgSF:3,268 Ac: .35 YB:1981 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. *********************** * Current • * Sale Statistics ************************************************************************* * Average Sale Price * Average Loan Amount * * * Number of Sales in last year : 3 * Number of sales in last 6 months : 0 * * * Note: Average Sale Price and Loan Amounts are calculated on full * ` value sales within the last year. ************************************************************************* ******************* * Farm Statistics * ******************* ******************************************* * Owner Occupied : 3 * Absentee Owner : 15 * * * Average Square Footage : 24275 * Average # of bedrooms : 2 * Average # of Bathrooms : 1.12 * Average year built : 1969 * • * * ******************************************* • • The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. I NOTICE OF i, -..OPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL . IPPLICATION AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON, WASHINGTON An Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET/LUA-97-031,ECF,CU,V DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF), Administrative Conditional Use (CU) Permit and a height Variance (V) in order to construct a 138 foot, 6 inch monopole tower in a multi- family residential zone. The project site is located in APA Zone 2. GENERAL LOCATION: 4715 NE 12th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Administrative Conditional Use Permit Variance Building Permit The date of Wednesday, May 28, 1997, at 7:30 PM, has been set for a variance public hearing to review the request for Variance (V). The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend. The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be,accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings or during Public Hearings. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications, by mail, of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or•the public hearing date(s) -for• this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. .I —T—, Uew +���'t- CENTRAL 3 i 4 HIGHLANDS PLAZA 'tRI J �,., " 6 a•• • '-_ W ,- - = rya DT`DAc os9 A< ' I u w e �'' a a s i ,�' 1 � I _ � _• .M a®�:: al Z_ • �I' ®® Qi I ., Q a' (21 {51 I51 z oa'• O aT 7_ ,L,^., � ., _S_w.o.9.m.®.-} .,= s.1 :,..ta,1 it � �.•6.1� la {2 mn.w axe `w T 5inqq cr.n 3 ' ® A1, .f,r'�— 6D�1 51® r v I)2 AG 1 L.% C� Ill . ' ".�i. ,'-72 ;. j I I r l MCC.m„,„.;...e 05$AC Ll v Q_. ® 1 saamcr i •` I Jo w N. l:i N.F Sedemon 4 SCNo.I Di.t,dl . - i n• ® :..o ® w'f• '• , IA9 Ac13' q.,4 L a , 4 : - � M�.m N � ° e 7,E 'J ) M w � iAc 40,2 ,ff. nn ? t •e . J., . .Im ,f E-,I Q J iardsm.n.i 3 •, 'JIi _ {J B• Johnni<L Brqr 191 Ac ri i _ w a4 ASNs < 6 wrn.dl< p 1 ' 1k ® ® I I I ' I9g °,i p qT ;'•'.i v . p a 01 g®, A< O • ' • ° .., M„ cQ ©_ ° a GENMALOT.DOC � Lwu - , I S + • PENDING APPLICATION . I PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET/LUA-97-031,ECF,CU,V • ' • DESCRIPTION. The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review(ECF),Administrative Conditional Use(CU)Permit and a height Variance(V)in order to construct a 138 foot,6 inch monopole lower in a mall- , family residential zone.The project site is located in APA Zone 2. . ' GENERAL LOCATION: 4715 NE 12th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Budding Permit _Preliminary Plat _Short Plat • - I XXXX Gondo lanai Use Pennil _Rezone _Site Plan Approval . (Admin.) ' • XXXX Environmental Review _Shoreline Conditional Use XXXX VARIANCE I Permit _Fill 8 Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial _Other Development Permit 1 . • The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. • Comments will be accepted any lime prior to Public Hearings or during Public Hearings. For further information on the application,or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the Cilys • environmental determinations,appeal periods and/or the public hearing dale(s)for this project,please contact the i Development Services Division al 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file i identification. . • rtj..i. ;r•51'. • _T o- ry•, its' �f°:•-- - . j L 'ift j „ i. -a-• 1.11 u • - -i I • _ _-1t-▪ ••1f) '.::`ATLAS OFSE8T1tr:°.j -ri:yi• e.rior.gmiir • • PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION. ' . CERTIFICATION . • i,. sah4- Jackson. , hereby certify that 3 copies-of the above document . were poste by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on - VYI a &h is ►°iq l Signed: SCIY1GW1-, g� - STATE OF WASHINGTON ) U ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) J r^ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that i) 7' signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voigal"rratfQQr•fhe uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. L • i,s vl.Q y . <` of Dated: �l /g 1 �� a W 4y1 v:o''P` . Notary Pu i in and f F. he State, P•lla ihith�jton • •Notary (Print) /v A-RG-'4-c2ET , ti_ty412 My.appointment expires: 61-Imr NO TAR Y,OOC NO1111111110E PENDING APPLICATION PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: NEXTEL FACILITY ON NE 12TH STREET/LUA-97-031,ECF,CU,V DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks Environmental Checklist Review (ECF), Administrative Conditional Use(CU)Permit and a height Variance(V)in order to construct a 138 foot,6 inch monopole tower in a multi- family residential zone. The project site is located in APA Zone 2. GENERAL LOCATION: 4715 NE 12th Street PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Plat XXXX Conditional Use Permit Rezone Site Plan Approval (Admin.) XXXX Environmental Review Shoreline Conditional Use. XXXX VARIANCE Permit Fill&Grade Permit Shoreline Substantial Other Development Permit The application can be reviewed in the Development Services Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted any time prior to Public Hearings or during Public Hearings. For further information on the application, or if you wish to be made a PARTY OF RECORD and receive additional notifications of the City's environmental determinations, appeal periods and/or the public hearing date(s) for this project, please contact the Development Services Division at 235-2550. Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file . identification. • • 03 lal _ z�_i. NeEa• a '- CENTRAL V k3 0 r E t U©e HIGHLANDS PLAZA I•; '�.; a Y •° 7 6 toi : nn Ig • ., Fi a 1,t� ���r`$F� ::__� `W e *4 Pgr.•, ..„ ® ,,,,,y,. i li 3 II a ,w,„.'.'' n,< ,�0 . ,n© -` ii 2 cum.'ae�m.e II- Itf - P '•:,} 1. ..: ®t. ®1 I� � �• " I 'Fewa.e N rein IfaA s t ] __ sOL N Bn .a,,��,, ,,,,,a(r--gam/� ]E/sTilT''�� . Neighborhood Wog PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE,IDENTIFICATION: CIT' DF RENTON mu. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 25, 1997 • Mr. Tom Donnelly Matthews Land Company, Inc. c/o Nextel Communications 5808 Lake Washington Boulevard, Suite 400 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Nextel Communications Project No. LUA-97-031,ECF,CU,V Dear Mr. Donnelly: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on April 15, 1997. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. The date of Wednesday, May 28, 1997, at 7:30 PM, has been set for a public hearing to review the request for Variance (V). The hearing, before the City of Renton's Board of Adjustment will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend. Please contact me, at 277-5586, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mark R. ell, AICP Project anager cc: Mr. Robert Fricks/Property Owner ACCPTLTR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 6AThis paper contains 50%recycled material.20%Post consumer • • MATTHEWS • p • • - - :Land Company, ' " , . ; , •• • - March 20, 1.997, , - .• Mr.:,Gil Cerise , ,1997 City of Renton cvto: Planning Department c�TyoF 'P�NN� • . 200 Mill;Avenue South RTON : •' , Renton, WA=9.8055 RE:.- rNextel Communications Conditional Use Permit.Application - - . Highiands/Hazen Site•(WA0111-2) A:P:N:•# 1.023057=9081-09: • Dear Mr:Cerise• ,. ',Attached per your'request is a Variance Findings report,for.the Nextel Communications" • • - Conditional Use Permit application.‘-Also•attached is a check for$1,200-to cover.the additional fees required for this application: . - I believe these,items-will•meet your requirements'for consideration of,the',above: reverenced:proj ect as a large communications facility.'•:If any information is • ' . requited at this time.please call me at.206/803'-3726 or 206/818-11.04. .• - , Sincerely; • Tom.Donnelly, _ . Land Consultan • • Matthews Land"Company,Inc..• 421.W:Riverside,Suite 605':.■ Spokane,Washington 99201 • 509;838.9500 • Fax::•.509.838..9888 VARIANCE FINDINGS ' ECE111Fr Highlands/Hazen Site (WA0111-2) 2ENT 0 199e •J Ld'� A.P.N. 102305-9081-09 M PLANNII� .;ITY OF RENTON The following information is submitted as justification for the City of Renton's Variance Findings: 1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size,shape, topography, and location or surroundings of the subject property; and the strict application of the Building & Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other owners in the vicinity and under identical classification. Due to the nature and type of communication facility proposed, strict application of the height limitations of the RM-N (Residential Multi-Family-N) zone would prohibit location on this property. A 120 foot monopole was deemed required through engineering studies to provide adequate service coverage to Coal Creek Parkway and along SR 900 from 132"d Avenue east to 156`h Avenue. Use of a shorter tower would require the location of additional towers in the same area to provide the same coverage as one pole at a height of 120 feet. There is an existing 123 foot monopole 16 feet north of the proposed tower. This existing tower establishes precedence for height variances within the neighborhood area for this type of structure. 2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated. The proposed facility is similar in size and appearance to other minor communications facilities located in rural areas of Renton. The monopole tower antenna support structure was selected for use because it will facilitate collocation of two wireless telecommunications providers and obviate the need to contruct separate, additional towers or monopoles for each provider. This area of Renton will benefit from a reduction in the number of antenna support structures that must be erected. Tower construction will meet or exceed all federal, state and local building code requirements. The development site (45 feet X 45 feet) will be enclosed with a locked 6 foot high chain link fence which will be topped with three strands of barbed wire. r The equipment shelter is similar in size and function to a large accessory structure such as a tool shed. In compliance with ordinance requirements, the facility will be landscaped to provide sufficient screening for the facility and its necessary fencing and equipment. The landscape plan includes the following plants: Douglas fir, western red cedar,paper birch, serviceberry and Pacific wax myrtle. As an additional screening device, the security fence surrounding the facility would be fitted with wooden slats. The site is located within a wooded area of the central portion of the subject 1.82 acre parcel. The equipment shelter and much of the lower portion of the tower would be screened in all directions by numerous existing trees, primarily consisting of evergreens such as cedar and fir. The existing communications tower, equipment building, and fenced area would further screen the facility to the north. After construction, the site will generate one vehicle trip per month by a technician. Use of this site will not create a traffic impact. Construction of the facility will create approximately 260 additional feet of impervious surface on this 1.82 acre parcel. Runoff created by this additional impervious surface area will be negligible and will not detrimentally impact the project site or surrounding properties. 3. That the approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. Height variances have been granted for similar uses in the vicinity and in the same residential zoning district. An existing 123 foot monopole is located 16 feet north of the proposed tower site. Granting this variance will not constitute the grant of a special privilege as precedence has been established for communications facilities of this height. 4. That the approval, as determined by the Hearing Examiner or Board of Adjustment, is minimum variance that will accomplish he desired purpose. Our engineers have determined that an antenna mounting height of 120 feet is required to achieve the necessary coverage for this service area, Coal Creek Parkway and SR 900 from 132nd Avenue east to 156th Avenue. Use of a shorter tower on this site would require the location of additional towers in the same area to provide the same coverage as one pole at a height of 120 feet. • •• :••• • ••:> •••••••,••••••::•••• VELO.P:MENT..S..R:.: CES..D.Ivl.S.1QN::::::::.: .::...:.............................::::.:.:.:::.::.::....::::::::::::.:.:::....... ••• • P•P I• •C T• ON . ..... . .:'ROJECT<INFORMA°Tl'>;:;"«.' <::;;>:;:»::>::::>::>_::>:�>::>:.................. .. . ................................. .. there>s more:>than one>le al`.>o:wner lease attach ar ad"di. onal g.6: `owner::; ::>;:.>:>`:><>s: :;.,:m «<:>. riotalized;:Ma§YerA"pplicatiori'fo'r..e h.. . :.. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Robert E. Fricks Nextel Communications Facility Highlands/Hazen site (WA0111-2) PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 1621 Camas Ave. NE � `� �� �L �' Renton, WA 98056 • CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98056 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): • 102305-9081-09 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 235-0336 EXISTING LAND USE(S): • vacant land • PROPOSED LAND USES: An unmanned telecommunications NAME: Mary Murdoch facility consisting of a 220 sq. ft. equipment shelter and a 134'8" monopole. COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Nextel Communications - Center Neighborhood ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): 5808 Lake Washington Blvd. , Suite 400 No change CF9‘fPr CITY: Kirkland, WA ZIP: 98033 EXISTING ZONING: �(5 RM-N MAR 1 • TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 803-3222 ppELOPNicr�t r`tio.ANVING PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable):CITY OF RENTON No change g • SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: h Tom, Donnelly 2,025 sq. ft. project area on 79,048 sq. ft. property • COMPANY(if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: • '.. $50,000 . Matthews .Land Company, Inc. ADDRESS: c'/o Nextel Communications 5808 Lake Washington Blvd. ,. Suite 400 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? No CITY: Kirkland, WA ZIP: 98033 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: (206) 818-1104 No ` `:'LEG E :: ;T '(Atf ch < �>:.::::::......................:...S.CRI ��:N'OF<PR:O:PER:.::..:.:.( :............:.::se. .aI <:she:e.t€:>If.!n'e:cessar:;•;> <€ «<g>>>«< <;<• The north 275 feet of the west half of the east half of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter _in Section 10, Township 23-North, Range 5 East, Willamette.Mer.idian, • in King County, Washington; except the west 42 feet thereof conveyed to King County for • 138th Avenue Southeast by deed recorded under Recording Number 6387727. 'I j• .•< TYPE.O :...AP.P CAT'IO.N...&..FEE ��>< `:] S <<:...0 eck..a l..a I catio ...t . es" hat appl.:E0i aff>: • II> et r e eV pi i<` '`> t st determ(n _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: • _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ • X CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $1,000.00 _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ _ GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ • ROUTINE VEGETATION — MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ . MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: ` _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ ZO(S„8D REVISION $ FFl A IT F OWNER HIP I, (Print NameThomaS J. Donnelly declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application, X the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein ° contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before m .' of I ibf i g n and Thomas J. Donnelly for the St to of W6ti,Ib15*Nesiding a - 4 �' 4 '+I (Name of Owner/Representative) , on the ijT Qtsg1ON'l",as3 /,I (Signature of Owner/Repre ntative) �jI `� ? A V A .�ti. `�`` _ " ���. Ignature o Notary Public) ; 'sj, '��, S, . 0.: 2 '>;a:::: ;:::<;:;a:>;>:::<: ;>s?;>:::»:::. :>:::<:::;M<::;:>:<:::>s; :;<:.a» ::5:;<:::s:;<:::;:::;::<::;;::::«< r>:: :t::;>::::z:>:;>:::a;>;:::W:A 'AS:<lg:r::: :6 :::::«:>:«::::::'::::4:3::i>::»N:::;::::.:F:::li:: ...a...... .............. ..............................................................................................:..................................:...................................................... s.::><.;:::<:<:..::>. »:;::: > , .:»:> »>::>;:>; :;: >: »»:...:»:>> (Th :...se o:..b .c.a.m Ie o#:4? :.C.I .Sta ff ....::.. ; :... : : ;i:i.i::..::.:.:.::: : : :.:....::•:.;:..:..:..:.:...::....:.::.::.,:..... > > . City e.. u . . : LC9kIE ...f. ; ; :»:.: C : : ... 5. . P:: FPTP. SPRUMPV:.:;:>n::.:;<;;:.;;;:•<>:::: TOT..L..E 5.....$. ... . ........................TO.TAL..P.O.STAGE.PROUIDED��>: :::: �.<: ..:,:;`:�< ::::': ` :::>'i:>>°:>:`::':> :'........ MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96 SENT BY: 3-12-97 ;12:05PM ; MK I t L-3 KC!N i viv-i-t,-aL i-i Luil„l GI G Ni • LA/A g7 a3 / cm cl.„, petal-tweedof Development i, Q.). a1 ' Xt l Se tionBellevue,e,K t+oo t, �o re CERII GA'TiCN TRANS/cat.K...... OF s S�ATUS - ,hereby certify that I ara anithe owner of the property which is the subject of this application for permit or approval. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify' that I am authorized by any and all other owners of the proper to make'this'eeztification and transfer any and all rights I/we have to apply for this pe.mit or approval to ►?l r4'I I`t1 etka.,,,l-ANA 6001 r ....-------' .- I therefore eirtify that_F-i.,., 64 mti1J N i e i 0.4 6 r ,is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and shall remain the "applicint" for the duration of this permit or approv- al unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. I ce.i under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the f• oin is .true and Corr C2 ir ` /2. sc) `mil.. 1 ri /"�JJ AZGLA2 . . side of own. Date Sigeod I, _...____,hereby certify that I am the • "applicant"-far this permit or approval. I sham remain'" the."appliwat".for the duration of this ptrsit or approval unless "applicant" stadia is transferred in writing on a-for.,prodded by this department. My address 1s: • OR - I, Toed 4Clisinl641r y/ M417 4,5 1.4L4 w �� hereby certify that I am an , authorized agent of HeA T6t_ ih i c#rtortS . ; a corporation or other busing rise lion authorized to do business in the State of Washington and that this business association is the"applicant" for this permit or approval. This association shall; ' remain the "applicant' for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is, transferred in wFiting on a form.provided by Ms department. The add.ess of this business association is: _ji U< •GuAi#? 8L.wd °krQc r�.rrwr�� ___j Let 91 u _ • I certify under penalty.of perjury under the law of the State of Washington that the foregoing is. true.and correct. . f, r �� � �� , Signab►re App , Date Signed ' NOTICE TO AIILTCANTS: ,,by,law,this department returns all engineering and other plans to the spplirsfL >r, >lowever,you wish to authorize the dep ent to return engineering and other plans directly to the engiueser,,arehutect ar ' ''other'000nulti =for the tint1trs ivi►tosa of ms}dcg correctioavplease denir,oate below: . - . • 0 I authorize this department to return plans directly to my consultait(s) for the limited purpose . of tnak'ing corrections, as designated on the back of this fora. ,;, wrst rFres.Plw s,tugr 'd1*1iE u211/45 i.H. CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON-PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). For nonproject actions, (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and,pro s), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or yy? �C1 tgb b read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND DEv CITY "-- eivow.1iVG 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Nextel Communications ESMR Facility: Highlands/Hazen (WA01 1 1-2) 1 Environmental Checklist 2. Name of applicant: Nextel Communications 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 5808 Lake Washington Blvd., Suite 400, Kirkland, WA 98033 4. Date checklist prepared: February 27, 1997 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing if applicable): The proposed communications facility will take approximately one month from the beginning of construction to airing. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: The facility may be expanded in the future to include up to three additional antennas pointing downward. Alternatively, future expansion could include up to nine 1 ' x 4' directional sector panel antennas that would replace the three to six omni-directional antennas. There is no anticipated change to the dimensions of the equipment shelter. Expansion of the facility is dependent upon customer demand and/or technological change. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None known. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by this proposal? If yes, explain. None known 2 Environmental Checklist 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. A. City of Renton Administrative Conditional Use Permit, Building Permit/V1,r''$nee B. Federal Aviation Administration: Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration C. Federal Communications Commission: Site Filing and Approval. 11. Give a brief, complete description of this proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. Nextel proposes to construct, operate and maintain an Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio (ESMR) communications facility. The facility would be located within a 45' X 45' area of the subject parcel. It would include construction of a 120-foot self-supporting monopole tower mounted with three 12'6" omni- directional "whip" antennas near the top, for an overall height of 138'6" to the tips of the antennas. The proposed facility would also include the placement of an 11 ' x 20' prefabricated concrete equipment shelter. The shelter would be used to house radio transmitters, receivers and other essential equipment. Mounted on the shelter would be two (2) Global Positioning System (GPS) antennas, which are 2" high x 4" wide x 4" long disks, and used only to receive. One of the GPS antennas would be operational; the second antenna would be for backup purposes. One test mobile antenna would be mounted on the cable bridge. The test mobile antenna is low gain and is 4" high x 8" wide. It is used for testing purposes only. 12. Location of proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Li' 115 1\16 12.Th-St- a. Address: 22" 3-90 "_ -ne 'f Renton, WA 98056 b. Section: 10 Township: 25 Range: 05 c. Parcel Number: 102305-9081-09 d. Legal Description: Please See Attached e. Nearest Town or City: Renton 3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH: a. General description of the site (circle one):4 rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountains, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The site is generally level. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Clay soils d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The 45' x 45' project area will be cleaned of debris and vegetation in order to prepare a 220-square-foot area for a concrete slab to support the prefabricated equipment shelter. There will be no exported or imported earth material for the site. Approximately 49 cubic yards of soil will be removed for the tower and shelter foundations and will remain within the project area for leveling. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No erosion is expected due to the flatness of the proposed site. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 13 percent of the 45' x 45' project area will be covered with impervious surface (includes only equipment shelter and tower foundations of 260 square feet). 4 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. None are anticipated to be necessary. However, if conditions arise, then erosion fences and hay bales, as well as other workable solutions would be implemented. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. Small quantities of dust and vehicular emissions may be produced during the one-month construction period. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control missions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river into which it flows. No. (2)Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 5 (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface waters or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-yr flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. The site is unmanned and will not require water or sewage disposal service. No wastes will be generated at this site, nor discharged to the ground. b. Ground Water: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities of withdrawals or discharges, if known. No. (2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural, etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) is/are expected to serve. None. No waste material will be generated by the proposed facility because it is unmanned. No wastewater or septic sewage disposal will be required. 6 c. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Negligible runoff will result from the addition of approximately 260 square feet under the equipment shelter, and the tower base. Any water will percolate immediately or be absorbed by the surrounding soils within a few feet of the site. The facility will not generate any wastewater. (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. The site will be unmanned; therefore, no waste material will be generated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water impacts, if any: The facility involves a minimal amount of impervious area. Disturbed areas will be covered with gravel. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other. X_ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other. X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other. other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Deciduous and evergreen trees, along with shrubs, bushes and grass in the project area will be removed for grubbing. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The site would be located within a wooded area in the central portion of the subject property. The equipment. shelter and much of the lower portion of the tower would be screened in all directions by numerous existing trees, primarily consisting of evergreens such as cedar and Douglas fir. The existing communications tower, equipment building, and fenced area would further screen the facility to the north. Because of the density and location of vegetation in proximity to the site, no additional vegetation is anticipated to be needed for the proposed project. Additionally, in compliance with local regulations, the facility would be landscaped with native plants to create a scheme with a variety of color and seasonal interest that would be both aesthetically pleasing and provide sufficient screening for the facility and its necessary fencing and equipment. The landscape plan includes the following plants: Douglas fir, western red cedar, paper birch, serviceberry and Pacific wax myrtle. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site, or that are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds; other crows, robins. Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver; other raccoons, squirrels, dogs, cats. Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not known. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 8 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electrical, natural gas, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used to run electronic switching equipment, lighting and air conditioners. Telephone service will be required for the electronic equipment. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans for this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: All equipment will conform to applicable energy codes. No additional conservation measures are anticipated to be necessary. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, what could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. There are no known materials that could cause fire or explosion. The proposed ESMR facility will transmit between the 851 and 866 Megahertz (MHz) portion of the electromagnetic energy spectrum, and will receive in the 806 to 821 MHz part of the electromagnetic energy spectrum. Transmissions will be low power, with an average of 50 watts per channel with a maximum of two channels per antenna. As such, the radio frequency power density levels near the tower base will be extremely low and several magnitudes below existing maximum permissible human exposure standards. Nextel's ESMR transmission radio frequency power density levels typically are measured at an average of less than .1 % of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the 9 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) recommended maximum exposure level of 567.3 microwatts per square centimeter. These very low power levels and ultra high frequencies at which the site transmissions occur also eliminate any potential for interference to other electronic devices such as radio, television, VCRs, telephone and medical devices such as pacemakers, which are internally shielded by the manufacturers to withstand more than 2,800 microwatts per square centimeter. Moreover, should any rare circumstances result in interference from the ESMR site transmissions, the FCC exercises absolute and exclusive authority to require the interfering party to immediately correct any such interference, even if it means turning off the offending transmitter. (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None required. The facility would be remotely monitored for fire, smoke, intrusion and AC power failure by Nextel's 24-hour electronic surveillance system. (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are anticipated to be necessary. b. Noise: (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect this project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? None. (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short term or long term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There would be noise related to construction activities during normal business hours throughout the one-month construction period. The proposed facility generates no sounds other than low volume, intermittent noise from the air conditioning units in the equipment shelter. Please see the noise study for the HVAC units, which is attached to the Attachment A for Communications Facilities Requirements form and part of the Conditional Use Permit application for this project. 10 (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: No additional noise control measures are anticipated to be necessary. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site area is located within a wooded portion of a residential lot. A single family residence is located immediately to the south of the project area, and an existing telecommunications tower exists immediately to the north of the site. Other uses adjacent to the property are as follows: North: Multi-family complex. East: Hazen High School. South: Undeveloped residential acreage. West (Across 138th Ave. SE): Partially developed medium density residential. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. A single family residence is located directly south of the project site on the subject property. An existing telecommunications facility comparable to the proposed project is located directly to the north of the project area. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No existing structures will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RM-N f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? CN - Center Neighborhood 11 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has anypart of the site been classified an "environmentallysensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. The site will be unmanned. One employee will provide maintenance visits to the site approximately once per month. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Zoning at the project site is RM-N (Multi-Family - Neighborhood). Telecommunications towers are permitted within this •zone with the submittal and approval of an Administrative Conditional Use permit. The proposed project would be compatible with existing land uses within in the site environs, which consist of multi-family and commercial uses, as well as Hazen High School, located to the east of the project area. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units will be provided, if any? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. 12 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 1 20-foot self-supporting monopole mounted with three 1 2'6" omni- directional "whip" antennas for an overall height of 138'6" to the tips of the antennas. The tower will be constructed of steel. The principal exterior material for the equipment shelter is rock aggregate. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The proposed tower will not obstruct views in the surrounding area. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The site would be located within a wooded area in the northern portion of the subject property. The equipment shelter and much of the lower portion of the tower would be screened in all directions by numerous existing trees, primarily consisting of evergreens. An existing telecommunication tower and accompanying equipment shelter would further screen the facility to the north. An additional aesthetic benefit for the community at large is achieved by locating adjacent to an existing telecommunication facility, which would minimize the impact of numerous individual telecommunications site located throughout the community. 11 . LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type, of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Lighting would be installed in compliance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements that are to be determined. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard, interfere with views? No. 13 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect this proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe: None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks, or evidence of historic, archeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None known. 14 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to the site would be provided from 138th Avenue Southeast. A 12-foot wide gravel access drive would be extended by approximately 35 feet from the existing access drive off of Northeast 12th Street. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest stop? N/A c. How many parking paces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? There would be parking available within the site area for one vehicle to provide routine maintenance visits once per month. No parking would be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. There will be one visit per month for routine maintenance of the facility. Visits would occur during normal business hours. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None are anticipated to be needed due to the low number of vehicular trips to the site. 15 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities available at the site: 4ectricit natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity provided by Puget Power Telephone service provided by U.S. West C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: %�� ,,4"4 :0p-re44 Name Printed: 7�rvi 7.0. 9 Gr. pofiyrGG` ��yt- fle -X -/ Date: Co-ife scoric.¢ 4,-.1vej 7filia 7 16 •/r .. .. MATTHEWS Land Company: City:of Renton March-11; 1997 Plarining/Building(Public Works'Department Development Services Division 200 Mill"Avenue South . , Renton,WA 98055 : RE: Conditional Use Permit Nextel Communications,Inc. , Highlands/Hazen Site(WA0.111•-2). . -•. ; APN:' 012305-9081-09. HandDelivery To Whom It May Concern: ' • On behalf Nextel Communications,'Inc., Matthews Land:Company, Inc:,'submits the enclosed _• - Conditional Use Permit application and materials .for,a:proposed Enhanced Specialized:,Mobile Radio (ESMR) transceiving facility.:on:a site known as Highlands/Hazen•in':the pity:of--Renton: The ESMR facility will consists of construction of'a 1'20-foot prefabricated tower with three (3) -. ;' omni-directional antennas on the proposed monopole.,; In addition,'_the,project: will. 'include'. construction:of-a 220-square-foot.prefabricated 2eCiuipment :building•'for: associated.;electronic ; ' equipment,•and,a"six(6)-foot high fence surrounding,the proposed site area. • The following:items are being submitted to assist the Planning Staff arid Hearing,Examiner in the'. :evaluation rand approval of thoproposed project: _ PROJECT'PLANS* _ (11) Development plan.sets(24"x 36") (1) Reduced plan set(11 X17) ; (1) PMT reduction of Neighborhood'Detail,,Map (1) ' Set of self-adhesive mailing"labels for property:owners:within 300 feet of site Application.fee SUPPORTING WRITTEN-.DOCUMENTATION; Master"Application Form ' Environmental'Checklist - c MAR 1 2`: I997 - Public Hearing Notification Materials.. , • - ' MailingAddresses'and,Certification.' DEVELop�iier�ir—�u,N,vic�,,_', • CITY General.Information: oF.RLiv,Tc7h Project Description:and,Statement:of Proposed,Operations, ' Justification for.Conditional Use PerinitRequest ' Matthews Land Company,Inc. ■;421'W. Riverside,Suite 605 • Spokane,Washington`99201 •.509'.838.9500,• Fax: 509.,838•,9888 Nextel Communications,Inc. - Highlands/Hazen Site March 10, 1997 Page 2 Neighborhood Detail Map Nextel Communications Informational Handout * Items not included in the bound submittal package(submitted separately) Nextel Communications, Inc. and Matthews Land Company, Inc. firmly believe that after review. of the submitted application and materials, the proposed ESMR project can be found consistent with the city of Renton adopted General Plan,Zoning Ordinances and Policies. We believe that the proposed ESMR facility at the Highlands/Hazen site can receive support and approval by the city staff for the following reasons: (1) The proposed use is consistent with the property's zoning and comprehensive plan designations. (2) The proposed EMSR facility is consistent with the height limitations of the zoning district. (3) The proposed project is consistent with the existing communication uses presently on-site. (4) The proposed EMSR facility will have no adverse impacts upon the surrounding community. In summary, businesses, local governments, emergency service agencies and citizens in the Renton area will benefit from a reliable and effective ESMR communications system to support economic growth and emergency preparedness. The proposed facility is essential to providing wireless telephone communication coverage within the city of Renton. I trust this information will be helpful in your timely review of our application. I would be pleased to provide further information as necessary to help your review process. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, Thomas J. Donnelly Land Use Consultant cc: Mary Murdoch, Systems Development Manager,Nextel Communications,Inc. Enclosures listed above MATTHEWS Land Company CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS,INC. Highlands/Hazen Site(WA0111-2) Renton,WA APN 102305-9081-09 March 10, 1997 GENERAL INFORMATION I. BACKGROUND Nextel is the largest domestic operator of Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) systems in the United States. The service Nextel has provided the general public to date has consisted primarily of dispatch and two-way mobile wireless communications. This type of communication system typically transmits from a single site, producing both a restricted service area range and limited capacity for subscriber usage. In response to these limitations, and understanding the need to further produce a variety of telecommunications systems intended to support the vision of a nationwide "Information Highway," the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) allocated frequency band spectrum to Nextel Communications for the purpose of developing and operating an"enhanced"version of its current service. This type of telecommunications system, called Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio (ESMR), utilizes both digital technology and a multiple site infrastructure network design. This advanced form of telecommunications offers a combination of wireless communication features and services not previously available from cellular telephone or other wireless communications companies. The integrated communications system includes mobile telephone, group communication, messaging, dispatch and data transmission. To date, these different services each have required separate pieces of equipment such as cellular telephones, pagers and computer modems. Nextel's ESMR technology uses only a single, lightweight handset. Because the ESMR system is digital, conversations will be clear, free of static, and less susceptible to fraud. In addition to this superior range of service, EMSR offers enhanced privacy, anti-fraud features and simple "user-friendly" menu formats in the handset. The ESMR system also will provide a larger range and greater subscriber capacity for general public use and Nextel Communications,Inc.-higiiiands/Hazen Site General Information March 10, 1997 Page 2 enjoyment than does the current Specialized Mobile Radio system. It is Nextel's intent to convert and develop its existing system to accommodate the new EMSR technology in order to meet growing public demand for wireless services, provide the latest technology, and comply with regulatory policies and procedures. Nextel activated service on its new ESMR network in the third quarter of 1994. ESMR augments existing telecommunications services due to the range of features it provides within one network. II. ENHANCED SPECIALIZED MOBILE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio is the newest and most versatile technology in a long line of continuing telecommunications advances. ESMR evolved from the "trunk" system. Trunking was a means of pooling channels and assigning them to a large group, enabling a much greater number of users to be assigned to a group of channels. This also reduced the possibility of obstructed frequencies, which can result in cut-off or cross-talk with other calls. Trunking evolved into Advanced Mobile Phone Service (AMPS). AMPS provided multiple channels and the "hand-off' technology, but did not provide enhanced wireless features. Handing a call off means that a call can be passed from one site to another without being disconnected. This development is important because it ensures a continuous flow of communications as users move between base stations. Special calling features such as fleet calling dispatch and messaging came with the next technological advancement, called Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR). As a private radio system, SMR became the first technology to offer fleet calling services. Fleet calling permits a user to broadcast messages to multiple handsets, such as with taxi, police, fire and transit services. However, a system still was needed that could accommodate an increased number of mobile customers within frequency bands. The digital ESMR technology was created to fill this gap. ESMR provides the greatest efficiency and user-friendliness to date. Digital technology allows up to six times more the number of users than does the current analog cellular telephone system, thereby making the individual base stations within a system network much more efficient and cost effective. Similar to the cellular telephone system, Nextel's ESMR network design is a collection of ground sites, called base stations, that form a cellular grid pattern covering a geographical area. The base stations are connected to a common central switch station, which is the "brain" of the system. The switch functions as coordinating hand-offs providing interconnections between Nextel's system and the local telephone network, and distributing dispatch traffic. III. PROJECT GOALS AND BENEFITS • Nextel is continuing to build out its Pacific Northwest ESMR network. The core system consists of multiple sites providing basic coverage to areas in Washington, Oregon and Idaho. Nextel Communications,Inc. -I;-,..lands/Hazen Site General Information March 10, 1997 Page 3 Implementation of the proposed facility has been identified as being essential to improve the quality and capacity of Nextel's service in the immediate Renton area. The ESMR system initially will augment and later replace existing SMR systems, utilizing frequencies currently used by SMR. As the demand for service increases over time, additional sites could be integrated between the existing facilities to expand capacity and improve transmission quality. A well-designed system is capable of growing within its market and processing several thousand calls simultaneously. The purpose of the proposed facility is to provide in-vehicle service in the Renton region. This site will greatly improve Nextel's ability to provide the highest quality of uninterrupted service to its users, and to comply with network buildout requirements specified by the FCC. IV. DETERMINATIONS OF THE ANTENNA SUPPORT STRUCTURE The height of the structure on which the antennas are mounted is set by local topographic and geographic factors such as the ground elevation, tree canopy, buildings, and mountains. Because ESMR signals must travel in an unobstructed path from one facility to another, the presence of any one or all of these physical elements can negatively influence the quality of transmissions and reception. The height and location of each Nextel site is, therefore, based upon the ability of the site to effectively function despite those obstacles. In addition, Federal Aviation Administration requirements regulate the height of an antenna support structure near or on major airport facilities. V. SITE SELECTION The need for a new ESMR site is dictated by capacity and coverage requirements for a particular geographic area. Once the need for a new site has been established, Nextel's system engineers identify a target area within which to locate a facility. Within the target area, a specific site will be selected based upon a variety of factors including local topography and geography, mitigation of the antenna-mounting structure's visual impact, the compatibility of the facility with existing land uses, and the ability to negotiate a mutually beneficial lease with a landlord. The proposed facility is described in detail in the attached Project Description and project plans. MATTHEWS Land Company CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Highlands/Hazen Site(WA0111-2) Spokane,WA APN: 102305-9081-09 March 10, 1997 PROJECT DESCRIPTION I. STATEMENT OF REQUEST Nextel Communications, Inc. (Nextel) requests consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio (EMSR) facility on a hilltop located south of NE 12th Street and east of Duvall Avenue NE in the city of Renton. The proposed facility will consist of a single 120-foot self-supporting lattice tower with multiple antennas and a 220-square-foot prefabricated building for associated electronic equipment. II. SITE SIZE AND LOCATION The proposed communications site will occupy a 1,651-square-foot lease area located within an existing 79,048-square-foot parcel of land presently owned by Robert E. Fricks. The project site would thus encompass approximately 2 percent of the subject property. The site is located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE, directly south of NE 12th Street. III. CURRENT LAND USES AND IMPROVEMENTS The subject property contains one single family residence, located approximately 60 feet southwest of the project site. Another existing telecommunications facility with a lattice tower and equipment building is located approximately 16 feet north of the proposed project site. An improvement road has been constructed off of NE 12th Street to serve this existing telecommunications facility. The proposed project site will be served by an extension of this access road. Nextel Communications,Inc.-...b..lands/Hazen Site Project Description March 10, 1997 Page 2 The site is zoned RM-N (Multi-Family - Neighborhood) and has a Comprehensive Plan designation of CN (Center Neighborhood). IV. SPECIAL SITE FEATURES No special features (e.g. wetlands, water bodies, steep slopes, etc.) are present at or near the subject site. V. OBSTRUCTION OF VIEWS Construction of the proposed project will take place on a wooded site currently occupied by a telecommunications tower. The proposed monopole will be slightly above the height of trees in proximity to the site. As a result, no views will be obstructed by construction of the proposed project. VI. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE AND IMPROVEMENTS Nextel seeks to expand its Pacific Northwest Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio (ESMR) network in the Renton area, which will include the proposed site. The project site will occupy a small portion of a large parcel of land. The project consists of an unmanned communication facility with a self-supporting lattice tower and several pieces of electronic equipment as described below. Tower and Antennas The project proposes to construct a 120-foot self-supporting lattice tower to serve as support for several antennas. The antennas on the proposed tower will consist of three (3) omni-directional antennas mounted near the top of the tower structure. In addition, two (2) GPS antennas and one (1) test mobile antenna will be mounted on the equipment building. Future plans call for the possible addition of nine (9)panel antennas and(2) two omni antennas to be located on the tower as future demand warrants. Equipment The equipment shelter will consist of a 10-foot-high prefabricated, state certified, concrete building. The outside dimensions of this building will be 11' x 20'. This shelter would be used to house associated electronic equipment and other essential equipment for the operation of the facility such as a distribution panel, surge suppressers, battery rack and control cabinet racks. Nextel Communications,Inc.- �ab..Iands/Hazen Site Project Description March 10, 1997 Page 3 Site Access and Facility Maintenance Access to the proposed site will be via a gravel road extending north from the project site and will be an extension of an access road currently serving the cellular site to the north. This access road is served by NE 12' Street. The proposed facility will be unmanned, and will not require staffing by personnel. As such, the proposed facility will not generate any employees, and will generate approximately one maintenance visit per month conducted during normal weekday business hours (7:00 a.m. to 5 p.m.). Emergency service would be provided on a 24-hour a day basis as necessary. Public Benefit Nextel's facility will provide significant benefits to the public at large. The public has come to expect and depend upon effective, advanced wireless services to meet its communications needs. This site will greatly improve Nextel's ability to provide the highest quality of uninterrupted service to its users, and comply with network build-out requirements as specified by the Federal Communications Commission. Compliance with State and Local Plans and Policies The project is consistent with the current zoning of RM-N, which allows construction of communications towers and transmission facilities with approval of an administrative conditional use permit. The project also satisfies the requirements of the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Aviation Administration. VII. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS No off-site improvements will be required for the proposed project. The proposed project will be an unmanned facility and will not require water or sewer service, and will no result in any impact to local police or fire services. Existing electrical power and telephone service is available to the site and will be upgraded, as needed,to serve the proposed facility. MATTHEWS Land Company CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Highlands/Hazen Site (WA0111-2) Renton, WA APN: 102305-9081-09 March 10, 1997 JUSTIFICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT I. RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE The proposed project site is designated as RM-N (Multi-Family -Neighborhood) and has a Comprehensive Plan designation of CN- (Center Neighborhood). The proposed use is a 120-foot monopole telecommunications facility along with a 220-square-foot equipment building. This use is considered consistent with uses identified in the comprehensive plan with submittal and approval of an Administrative Use Permit. II. COMMUNITY NEED Nextel's facility will provide significant benefits to the public at large. The public has come to expect and depend upon effective, advanced wireless services to meet its communications needs. This site will greatly improve Nextel's ability to provide the highest quality of uninterrupted service to its users, and comply with network buildout requirements as specified by the Federal Communications Commission. III. PROJECT GOALS AND BENEFITS Nextel is continuing to build out its Pacific Northwest ESMR network. The core system consists of multiple sites providing basic coverage to areas in Washington, Oregon and Idaho. Implementation of the proposed facility has been identified as being essential to improving the quality and capacity of Nextel's service in the immediate Renton area. Nextel Communicatioi inc. -Highlands/Hazen Site Project Justification March 10, 1997 Page 2 The ESMR system initially will augment and later replace existing SMR systems, utilizing frequencies currently used by SMR. As the demand for service increases over time, additional sites could be integrated between the existing facilities to expand capacity and improve transmission quality. A well-designed system is capable of growing within its market and processing several thousand calls simultaneously. The purpose of the proposed facility is to provide in-vehicle service in the Renton region. This site will greatly improve Nextel's ability to provide the highest quality of uninterrupted service to its users, and to comply with network buildout requirements specified by the FCC. The Nextel system represents a response to the realities of an increasingly mobile environment. Both the private and public sectors have come to expect diverse services attached to mobile communication, including mobile phone, paging, voice mail, easy access by two-way radios and transmission of data from the field. To date, these various services require separate pieces of equipment, i.e. cellular phone, pagers, two-way radios, computer modems and faxes. These services also require separate systems and facilities for their operation. Nextel has unified all these functions and services into one system. In addition to the traditional cellular services currently offered by cellular telephone companies, the Nextel system provides two-way communication, message paging, voice mail, and wireless transmission of data. Further, the system is digital, which provides clear, static-free conversations. The Nextel handset looks like a cellular telephone, but instead encompasses all of the functions described above. The digital cellular service provided by Nextel will be more economical than traditional cellular services and conventional telephone service because it not only provides calling services, but call waiting, call forwarding, call restrictions, voice mail, and a wide area of toll-free calling. The two-way service speeds the delivery and improves the efficiency of local emergency services. Police officers and firefighters can dispatch emergency services and speak directly to one another over the Nextel handset by the touch of one button. This simple approach saves precious time currently consumed by an officer needing to dial into a dispatcher who in turn dispatches other officers, who in turn must contact the officer originating the communication. This same service currently is under consideration by local utility companies wanting to use the system to communicate with their fleets of workers for both routine and emergency services. The ease of use and intercom capacity of the two-way system also benefit businesses. Whether a business is composed of two employees or 200, direct and cost-effective communication among employees is important. The two-way system allows a worker in the field to talk to his or her office or to a number of his or her associates either in the Nextel Communications;Inc. - Highlands/Hazen Site Project Justification March 10, 1997 Page 3 field or at the office by pressing one button. Ease of communication may facilitate better communication. In addition, such communication may be encouraged by containing the expense of making it. It is estimated that more than 40 percent of current cellular telephone usage in business is between a person and his or her office. Given the rates for cellular service, the communication between a worker and his or her office constitutes considerable expense. Rather than charge fees based on time usage for the two-way system, Nextel will charge a low, flat monthly fee. This low, flat fee could save a business literally hundreds of dollars annually. The foregoing benefits apply equally to businesses located in homes, another increasing trend. The Nextel system is equipped to take advantage of wireless data communications opportunities. Beginning in 1996, handset users are able to transmit data from their regular or laptop computers without the need for a modem or facsimile machine hookup. This ability to transmit data from the field will be invaluable for the increasing numbers of people who work outside of conventional offices, or who telecommute. It also will reduce the need for field employees to transport data back to the office by automobile. IV. LOCATIONAL DETERMINATIONS OF THE ANTENNA FACILITIES The height of the structure on which the antennas are mounted is set by local topographic and geographic factors such as the ground elevation, tree canopy, buildings, and mountains. Because ESMR signals must travel in an unobstructed path from one facility to another, the presence of any one or all of these physical elements can negatively influence the quality of transmissions and reception. The height and location of each Nextel site is, therefore, based upon the ability of the site to effectively function despite those obstacles. In addition, Federal Aviation Administration requirements regulate the height of an antenna support structure near or on major airport facilities. V. SITE SELECTION The need for a new ESMR site is dictated by capacity and coverage requirements for a particular geographic area. Once the need for a new site has been established,Nextel's system engineers identify a target area within which to locate a facility. Within the target area, a specific site will be selected based upon a variety of factors including local topography and geography, mitigation of the antenna-mounting structure's visual impact, the compatibility of the facility with existing land uses, and the ability to negotiate a mutually beneficial lease with a landlord. As part of the site selection process,Nextel Communications undertakes a thorough examination of existing transmission facilities in the search area in order to identify locations that may be suitable for collocation. It is generally a priority of the site Nextel Communicatioin, inc. - Highlands/Hazen Site Project Justification March 10, 1997 Page 4 selection process to identify existing sites that could accommodate Nextel facilities without construction of additional towers or equipment. In cases where no facilities exist that can accommodate the current and future telecommunication needs, candidate sites are identified according to criteria reflecting the least impact on the community, surrounding land uses, and environmental considerations. The subject Highlands/Hazen site has been selected for its unique characteristics in its ability to serve the telecommunications needs of customers, as well as the suitability of the site to surrounding uses. Construction at this site is anticipated to have negligible impact on the environment(see accompanying Environmental Checklist). In addition, location of the proposed transceiving facility adjacent to existing comparable facilities will minimize the impact of such uses at various individual locations throughout the community. VI. EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES Construction of the proposed facilities will occur within a 1,651 square foot area, and will be served by the extension of an existing service road. Construction will take place over a 30-day period. Access to the project site is provided off of NE 12th Street, which is not a through street. Northeast 12th Street provides access to NE Duvall Avenue immediately to the west. This access is shared with a multi-family residential complex located to the north of the project site. Impacts of construction will be negligible and are anticipated to have little or no impact on surrounding uses. No other adjacent uses will be impacted by construction of the proposed project. The proposed project will be an unmanned facility requiring approximately one maintenance visit per month. The project will therefore have minimal effect on adjacent properties or land uses in terms of day-to-day operations. ON THE INSIDE... r agog 7 if.. ', ..,.••••••• 7 ., 11 1. jil : ............ . .:Aft.,44:7•4Iitt i -15' .. 1 -.......•••• -•••••••• '. ) .•••••••••••-•1 •' • FREQUENTLY 1 , 11116.7.2.--- MEI ASKED i ., - k .4 FINANCIAL ...IMIT•tir '. MilMilml, 71=1. • ' ACCOMPLISHMENTS QUESTIONS ' , -. , ,t INTERNATIONAL , INFORMATION • el NEXTEL COADIUNICATIONS,INC. (.VASDAQ:CALL) SPECIAL UPDATE SUMMER 1996 • Nextel is the nation's leading provider of integrated wireless communications services for teams of mobile workers. The company has secured the largest geographic footprint of .. any single wireless company in North America, a highly skilled senior leadership ....,,......., ,„'431+, 0./..:,, team, the commitment and expertise of Motorola, and the leadership and --17-'. ; ••-. .4_,,,,,, 7,..r.•-; .,,,' ..5:- ,.-' ----•‘..---' .-, • - ..,,4:-_, Vision of Craig O. McCaw The following information is provided to .4f,'' ";'" - 'e-', -'• :-.,.' ' ...) , you as a special update on recent accomplishments and " reef -...e ,„?.i' ' 4., 1,...e.''-`..•'-,-., . . 41 .1 - 0,..4, !,4-; . ,..-,.0-,- '‘..\.- y '' ' ' - .;f" ••• developments underway at Nextel. ., is ,,•,,,,...„ •, ,..,y2,_, ,...-!:-.,,:„.-, 4,-or... .•:4- ,-.:;.- --s-,.,4' ! / .(2,.._.., ..7.,,:j. -,...,., '- • ,-/-0 e ' ' 't...t'' ro .. ,,,.,r„,..._•....-,.,.., ..„ -,,,,,,-. - ,..„,„,,,. . -..,..,..- •.„. ,, , ,,,,,,,,,,,-; -•,,,,,_..,,,•„..,•.... ,.t., ,..„-4,-,- 3,-, „c„,., . :.,, , ,,,,.., - ..;."..„,....,..:.--;,_-.,-.- '..f.'- • ' ,.. .4,-7' ••,,...- -..,,,....1:,,,."4•4;',....i.,•.4,-..... ''-• j•. 1 .4. .4, .4. • ,ir ,4,'''-1 i'lr,i,.-,1- C,...., ..,,:%,,...',-- , '-f .lift 1 •"% ; ,j 11.74-9"' • :ibt/10) . , . • Af' •'e":' • 2;:t4'-1 J.!. • ' %'* ' C.'$ - - --..... .....A.1 A ..,.,,...... -..:,,,- ,- • f.....'A.-.' • / , ,.•'5,1.14.,C.V.'. We'd/4 A.,,:1", ;',.,„ ,.. , : ; ‘.'!C,',I,PC.,%4F,Ii44.,a:A. ,t 4-, '0,i':•le-,..' ,•:-,,N,'4.J,.'"Ff,i •:,%1•.tt;• 4".t,O,P-f...Y"'A , ;. ,,..‘.t::.-,te0.',:'0 4,err-.2 :•-,,,,...`.4:.-:. ,', ..:•••• '. ...,0:•• l 4` ,O..4, 111:.`,21;i..` ...44:4f.. .::," ' ..',;.:,:•r 1 .. 11. A' k P',':- \ 6.:,'..,e,s,,,..,..,, ,.!, t , .., loftdf,h,-.1„, , ., , )?4,....r:,, ,r•As, , sr,t,;#,04, '1•.% i -'•\ 1 ,.t,,,,k,, I zs• It ,',.,,r.„'.,1,4},,,4:y6-'' vtl,U !".„7,:i..,..,,,,,31...:.,,k5•:,,T..,,,,..47,,'',,,..... .., e.,:,..,,,,,_,... ,,,..„4,,,,,f. ,„ tss,i ver N, -,.,..,;,,n 4 -1 ,.' l',,Zi ..,; ''•b \ ,,.:ti -.. .1 \ t ' '1''kill 41'.[:ifts.-P.N1 .r',..:3 . ,.; - '...-..7 0 • ti,..:03L.; 'ff.r,:l. \\ 1 r - •,, ,,I.--,t4.4 _,,,,,,se• — i ,.,... ,,,„. .,_ .• L....,,,,,,,,,..„..„, —..,,,,, , • e , 4'. ,4,0 . ..,.., '''. . ', - 4-fi,'• I A] ;no: ''' e7., 'to,:..-'V.,,,,Ifre,.:-i,r: ..,t.•,,'f :1, ., ',,, „,--,,,r----; - -'1:', .. ,.- ,'' lik bi•W--...•, .,...,. .11., ,'" .,:el,„, „ .; ,: , ,., --..- ; it--t- 4:.-:J.,,..A. .,'1.'fft,, .-A,,....,,. '7-y..i.s,..r,' t' --"' . ,61; .'.' ...,-'. .1'::-.h,t Irt•'-,P:',:, '44'..%"!- - r't •i".;...' . ...,' , - , • 1-.§1,,-it' ',..-• 0,- ,..-....i ,..- 4'%:"1..-,,,,y„-co-Jp-$4'.4,- '7: k. .4^- ';'•t, ' .er'-' • ,,.,i,r. is . .r...... 41,'":,:-.,.....;,, -. .,.•.,r-72.-.. -1' . -- - - 4 ,t,, ,...,'r.14''','VV.0.":"..4r ,A4 r 'n,i,','''A' .!,;'•• 'A.f.,,pr 1. ''. ' • --==- _-_-_-:,-. --4-__. --.. • • N te,...,--',_ ___.;---1 and ,' ... (.1,'. • '.• ''.1,sr-,X..14.,-..;'.'1A','",47,lf^:;b:.. .:1.1...,. ---.41..1.1.4.T --.k-- - '4,- ., • •", '-',;(*.i---'‘.;ts100-4.04'.-;,::`,t17-344.14-4.1:Z -.4.1'.,,,..--,,,-.,-ri,A,- -, Nextel's new Chairman Chief Executive Office?. ,k ,i-r ' 1,/•:'•';''',i, ...4"rt••;''' 4 r'-'4.7ti''t'''',4 .41'''.s.,,- ,'''4.co t• ..,if)i 8.::'•"r'it ' --,-''''f.t i Daniel3 ft',"j4iii,.• „„ ..A7.4,.''' .,,,,e'. , f.,.*:y1,izi"...74;11:•.-4-A. ''.??..-V,i,-...7,5''‘','"'''i'4' .4) E Ake, (left)and Pr esident and Chief 1 1.-f ... - 1.. •ttittit(1,1..,, ,-1.- ,tt,,,,,,..;41401.e".•41:4,-$3,46....f, egi-C sr,,,,t4i s',,,,,,. .4.;A ,a. 1.-,, 4-. r.: N• , 4-,,,,,-. .-....cip-.,4_1:01,11itcrow` 'i,''.'"''''' Pv.mit Operating Officer Tin?,Donahue have considerable .i.r :.,'..,;'..,. •--,,If r 0,,,,,,f- $,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,:,,,t,,.if. -.,-,.,,imt--,,,,Pdr 'f" '43 -14..‘1.r.- v- 04 experieme in commimications technology and 4 , i „,,,Et-f-, i,., k., ,,r,,,,,,, ,,,,,T, ', .,-,k,....ir,,p,w 1:.,.:, WA,. -;',. 4 , • ' '..,t wireless operations.They are committed to the , 4 ,,, . .r.% ,.. ,t.. ..4. .... ,f1P.4 ••4a,., t. " ' -. ...: ' ..,te.. •-1,..•• r-!,4,..,r*,1.. ?•Z X• ,'4,';',:,,trig. , .71,014 & . pirs••-•tro-......,, .4,3.,t.,%. , ,,c.„,. ,... ......:, i. .?•,`.46.7-. 't le'4,,p 4e—W•10 6.1....‘ .,,,,':,,,i,r----, ...... 4,-=', -,:::;.v. , -:, . , enhancement of shareholder value while delivering i '' •-'1 ,er A.,,,-r'l' 'vituos it ...i„1,-,',2 f•-:-..0.),,...,,‘, , tr,:t.:..-44....At„..,.ro,,..,,,,...,„ high-quality wireless pi•oducts and services to .t ,..-v;t,,, , ,'It ;:t.";4,i'ff?,41',"':',4'',304X"e •f',1'+-in4f,,4?r,''''',',t,";„-.1, . ,,s,, business customers nationwide. !' i. j...-,17.r, -,',,,) 30clifF';0•7,1-4,if ,`_k!:•,-,. ,P,1')Asi,.• ''' Ve--P- --'.i•ftv ''.% .14,1V;A, -. - ...t. 4 *r4=A. '7104 4'' ff' '' .1r “er•,:fl. V. "P',,,t,,r'.4., ,' , .:.,.--. l'• '..'i '' "-^Isski,:k. ......,..' 4,... ",..asd-.44. f.4it*.‘, ,. ' .t.', '.. ,.,.. . Y:.:CA'-'3:::;',eltiri?.V415• ' "" — . : •:i . ',.: ' , t . . T zif y '1r At a Nextel news conference on April 5, r = 1995 wireless wer 11,11. 101 Accomplishments . �` m ,- Craig O.McCaw(right) tia° N, and Christopher Galvin, President and Chief fi{ Operating Officer of Motorola,announced a ;SENIOR LEADERSHIP TEAM a cooperative agreement if Daniel F.Akerson joined Nextel as Chairman of the Board tarte.74sto create high-quality and Chief Executive Officer on March 6,1996.Prior to y+i wireless services for the nations mobile work 'joining Nextel,Akerson was the former Chairman and Chief V groups. Executive Officer of General Instrument Corporation and the former President of MCI Communications Corporation. Morgan E.O'Brien and Brian D.McAuley,Nextel's founders, STREAMLINED REGULATIONS will serve as Nextel's Vice Chairmen. •Consumers and businesses continue to embrace wireless •Tim Donahue,formerly the Regional President of AT&T technology,including Nextel's unique integrated service,as a Wireless Services'operations in the Northeast,was named way to improve their productivity and quality of life.During President and Chief Operating Officer. 1995,almost 10 million new cellular subscribers were added in 1•Steven M.Shindler,formerly Managing Director of Commu- the United States alone.With nearly insatiable customer nications Finance at Toronto Dominion Bank,the largest demand for portable communications,the wireless industry supplier of capital to the wireless industry,was named Senior seems assured of continued long-term growth.At the same Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. time,the new landmark federal telecommunications law is I•Barry West was named to the newly created Chief intended to unleash new opportunities for the communications Technology Officer position.West was most recently with industry. Cellnet,the pioneer of cellular communications in the United •During 1995,the Federal Communications Commission Kingdom,overseeing development of"follow-me"numbers voted to allow specialized mobile radio(SMR)operators and linking GSM cellular data customers to the Internet. significant spectrum enhancement and consolidation opportu- • Tom Kelly was named Vice President of Marketing with nities,which can potentially enhance Nextel's nationwide overall responsibility for national marketing and sales.Kelly spectrum position.Advances in digital technology more than previously served as Regional Vice President of Marketing triple the capacity of Nextel's unique spectrum position.The for AT&T Wireless Services. FCC's innovative spectrum auctions continue to recognize the value of wireless spectrum. LARGEST WIRELESS FOOTPRINT IN NORTH AMERICA •Nextel has secured a unique North American wire- . less footprint by closing transactions to acquire wire- •'M■ • less licenses from Motorola as well as the operations Frequently Asked of OneComm,American Mobile Systems and Dial Questions Page,which now operate under the name Nextel. I •During 1995,Nextel and the combined compa- nies of OneComm and Dial Page constructed and __. ... _ _._._ deployed digital service in dozens of U.S.cities, WHAT IS NEXTEL? making the company's 1995 network additions Nextel is the leading provider of integrated wireless communi- i one of the fastest buildouts of wireless net- , cations services in the United States focusing on the needs of works in the United States. teams of mobile workers.Business customers access the Y_ " `_•' •Nextel's integrated digital mobile service is company's digital services using a single handset that enables _T= now available in areas where more than half of the U.S.population lives and works. _... K1-"". I 129,000* 96,000* instant conferencing as well as text messaging,portable tele- WHAT CHANGES ARE NEXTEL'S DIGITAL UNIT phone services and future high-speed data capabilities.Nextel PLANNED FOR DIGITAL GROWTH operates digital and analog wireless networks throughout the SERVICE? United States. Through the end of 1995 61,000 and into early 1996,Mr. WHAT SERVICES DOES NEXTEL PROVIDE? McCaw and Nextel's senior 37,000 Nextel now offers traditional analog dispatch service to more leadership team have than 800,000 SMR units throughout the United States.With worked closely with 22,000 nearly 130,000 digital units in service,Nextel is attracting Motorola to improve its 13,500 more and more business customers to its integrated approach integrated dispatch 1Q95 2Q95 3Q95 4Q95 1Q96 to digital wireless,service.Some key digital features: enhanced network ',Includes Dial Page •Instant conferencing service is affordably priced,highly (iDENTM),the technology secure and provides one-to-one private conferencing as well as behind Nextel's innovative digital service.The resulting the unique ability to talk simultaneously to multiple units(at improvements,which will be introduced in select markets in the push of a button)without dialing or paying roaming fees. 1996,will provide a high-quality and powerful new tool for •Portable telephone service provides the latest features, business customers. including call hold,call waiting,call forwarding and voice mail. •Message Mai1TM service includes numeric and text messag- ing(up to 140 characters per message)with one-touch callback z and advanced computer software that lets you know when /fil-4, F-77�;1. your message has been received. 41: International NEXTEL'S DIGITAL NETWORK - •�,„„ McCaw International,Ltd.,a wholly owned subsidiary of Portland i Nextel,has appointed an experienced senior management I. / (.'max , Porbmouth ==itiesctive opportunities in exciting ional markets. •:„oltR.iod. Newark • • Sacramento Chicago • Phlledolp„ta So Francisco BalOm.e •Nextel invested$23 million in the initial phase of a high- . oaklone , San dose .'• "• • Y asnlnpton,DC Fresno Loa Vega, -..' .. , .` TapeknKensasCiq BLLeak f ; quality GSM cellular operation in Shanghai,China. Santa Barber,Bakersfield Wlehlk _TLo.Angeles eaa sn,.mm •Nextel owns approximately 25 percent of Clearnet Commu- � ' Tulsa "000• � san Diego w •kl.noma Cl AA„antae} am nications Inc.,a Pickering,Ontario-based operator of Canadian urp Birmingh • SMR systems and other wireless communications activities. P ' " \' Clearnet currently expects to provide service using Motorola's NEXTEL'S ANALOG NETWORK 1 iDEN technology in 1996 throughout major areas of Canada. •Nextel also owns approximately roximatel 18 percent of •Se ttM `�e 4 `,�i • L \•. Corporacion Mobilcom S.A.de C.V.in Mexico.Mobilcom holds Po , ,••• �-t,. — 1 • -., , equity interests in corporations licensed to provide SMR ser- i-4-mi . . - • t. 4 T chaster vices throughout Mexico,including Mexico City,Guadalajara, San Frentl •;;•:...3 . 4„11,11 ! , 1• aaa„. .. .PIttsOurn. _ Z a"la Monterrey,Acapulco and Tijuana,as well as along Mexico's o Jos ver� ntllmepol� S lu J +r major highways. 4 Ken.q CI Loul. • `{ sIIsaille . s Graens•u ••B +• • pklanoma CI • • .mphl. ii I � • f • • •� I . Alma o• •�IL• Polk, e r]�F--` ��ek,o NouslenNM rle -"Vr Amomo.•_ "S. • .Tam. ENVIRONMENTAL & HEALTH concerns • Answers to commonly asked questions about electromagnetic energy 1. What are the characteristics of cellular radio waves? Simply put, cellular radio waves are a form of radiant energy that contains both electric and magnetic components. This electromagnetic energy travels or radiates in waves like the ripples which form when a small rock is thrown into a pond. "Radiation" describes the passage of energy through space. Radio waves are a form of non-ionizing radiation that cannot strip electrons from molecules, in contrast to X-rays and gamma rays, which are forms of ionizing radiation used in medical diagnosis and treatment. It is important not to confuse the effects of ionizing radiation, like x-rays and gamma rays, with non- ionizing radio waves. 2. Do I absorb all of the electromagnetic energy that I am exposed to? No. Except at resonant frequencies not used in cellular communications, only a fraction of the electromagnetic energy to which one is exposed is actually absorbed by the body. The amount absorbed depends on a variety of factors, especially the frequency of the radio wave. Frequency refers to the number of waves passing a given point during a given time. Because biological effects depend on the amount of energy absorbed, the frequency of the electromagnetic waves affects the specific absorption rate (SAR), a fundamental dosimetric concept in the evaluation of exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation. The human body absorbs relatively little electromagnetic energy at cellular frequencies (800 - 900 MHz) compared with absorption at resonant frequencies (30 - 300 MHz). 3. What are the sources and characteristics of public exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic energy? Exposure to electromagnetic energy is common and comes from a number of natural and man-made sources. For example, the flow of electrical charges within the earth, which accounts for its magnetic field, and the energy from the sun are both constant sources of exposure to electromagnetic energy. Even the human body generates and emits electromagnetic energy. Common man-made sources include electric utility lines, household wiring and appliances, and computers, as well as television and radio broadcasts. 8 ENVIRONMENTAL &HEALTH concerns 4. How do cellular radio wave transmissions compare with other common sources of electromagnetic energy? We are exposed to low levels of electromagnetic energy from a wide variety of sources. The relative contribution from cellular telecommunications is very small. Commercial radio and television broadcasts are thousands of times more powerful than cellular transmissions, and yet, because radio waves dissipate rapidly with distance, public exposure to even the high powered FM radio broadcasts is minimal. The Environmental Protection Agency has performed extensive measurements of commercial radio fields in the largest U.S. cities and found that 99% of the public exposure is 200 to 1,000 times below the permissible exposure standards. Therefore, exposure to electromagnetic energy from cellular communications is insignificant. 5. How do we know that exposure to cellular radio waves is safe? Concern about extremely-low frequency (ELF) fields associated with high- voltage transmission lines and household wiring has triggered unjustified concern for the ultra-high frequency (UHF) waves associated with radio and television broadcasting facilities. There is abundant scientific evidence that there are no harmful effects associated with the low-power radio-wave transmissions used in cellular communications. Several thousands.of scientific studies have been reported on the biological effects of exposure to high frequency radio waves such as are used in cellular. communications. These studies have been conducted by researchers in universities, government, and private laboratories throughout the world. These studies provide a large, reliable database of information on levels and durations of exposure - the kind of information needed to establish the conditions under which exposure does not result in harmful effects and to set safety standards with a high degree of certainty. 9 • **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 03/20/97 14 :26 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9701714 Amount : 50 . 00 03/20/97 14 :26 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1087 DONNELLY Init : LN Project # : LUA97-031 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 102305-9081 Site Address : 4715 NE 12TH ST Total Fees : 2,455 . 76 This Payment 50 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 2,455 . 76 Balance : . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 50 . 00 csj' � 1 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 03/20/97 14 :19 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9701713 Amount : 1, 200 . 00 03/20/97 14 : 18 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #6125 NEXTEK\L Init : LN Project #: LUA97-031 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 102305-9081 Site Address : 4715 NE 12TH ST Total Fees : 2,455 . 76 This Payment 1, 200 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 2,405 . 76 Balance: 50 . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0006 Conditional Use Fees 1, 000 . 00 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 200 . 00 9 *********************************************************,******* City of Renton WA Reprinted: 03/11/97 17:12 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9701466 Amount: 205.76 03/11/97 17:12 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1081 DONNELLY Init: LN Project #: LUA97-031 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 102305-9081 Site Address: 4715 NE 12TH ST Total Fees: 1,205.76 This Payment 205.76 Total ALL Pmts: 1,205.76 Balance: .00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 200.00 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 5.76