Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA97-155 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: October 30, 1997 To: Peter Rosen a, From: Kayren K. Kittrick, Plan Review JL Subject: Renton 100 Apartments LUA-997-155, SA-H, ECF EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER - There is an existing 12-inch diameter water line in S. 3rd Street. The water lines in Morris, Second and Logan vary in sizes from 4 to 6-inch in diameter. The water lines are being replaced with larger diameter mains (12-inch ) to meet the required fire flow by the City of Renton Water Utility during the 1998 spring construction season, with appropriate spacing of new fire hydrants in coordination with the Daily project. SEWER - There is an existing 12-inch diameter sanitary sewer on the north side of the proposed project and in Logan Avenue. An 8-inch diameter sewer line serves the parcels to the south of the pipeline right-of-way. STORM - There are existing 12-inch diameter storm drain lines in the rights-of-way surrounding the site, as well as in the Seattle Pipeline property. A preliminary storm water report with calculations determining whether water quality facilities or detention is required was received with the application. STREETS - The adjacent streets are fully improved with sidewalks, curb and gutter, paving and streetlighting. Logan will be upgraded in conjunction with the Piazza improvements in the 1998 construction season. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.113 per square foot of property. The fee for 54,310 square feet is $6,137.03. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.078 per square foot of property. The fee for 54,310 square feet is $4,236.18. SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge is not triggered by this development as no additional impervious surface is created. DALLYGF.DOC . -., ,t r..'s.1•: f? < > w 't Z I 0 / S.9RD ST. ,s eN• > z.,..e.i a . to NO 9‘5°6.' CC CC 0 v SITE ...sow • SW 7TH ST. viKi s' atik°- 405 515 or 1111114111 VICINITY MAP , QIIIII RENTON 100 NOT TO SCALE 97013 RM-VMAP.DWG • DOWNTOWN CORE AREA Figure . 1 Proposed Boundary Revision CS in z z 3 c a, a, a, /• \ -------...... ...-3 _________.<1 _ <C enton Municipal AirportI,/ 1 . \\ —T d s . vii. sof, I_ __ J----- , t._ . ii . - i ■ \\ .i N 2nd St r—J _ \ . ♦ A' !III I• l J., d \ Tobin Ave S \S) i � \; !' .! t \ UM 11 ! >c L cu a 1/1 4 S1 i 3J S 2nd St --I S 2nd St / a, 3 �a., *110 S 3rd St J I I Iri S 3rd St ' / ■ ii,„in ro ,z,„ d ■�3 0�5' S 4th St L_�l /� EN , WO /Ji \ 'i _ I v, 22 o. _IS 4th St /1 1 sys-e'cs\—.1 c' ---/- 1-*--e > ti T • , Planning and Technical Services ——— Existing Downtown Core Area Planning/Building/Public Works Boundary * O." Dennison, R. MacOnie Proposed Downtown Core Area ��-"•) 22 May 1997 Boundary 0 400 800 Proposed Dally Project Site 1 :4,800 ., . .. .• y. ,� b 9/ Vf' R . .. ,,,.....„ . .., i 1 so • tos Ala . illk.• . . . •V,.a W.,. ..1i1 • i 1 ofre, ... .. . ,.0.-ie •• • •• . • a. C 44. ' ... a • a:A% '..N,.:,•4. , . ,,. „,..0ivi, '1,-..,. ' '- •- Y.. , . 0, , ,.. - .4( '4i 4: .7:1; " . Sa SI ..- , 111114. 414 ___ 7....n..s,.z.'..\0 1 - .. _. • Oft• /_+ \., ' • / ` I^ .. 'r 7�n/' .. \ ., 11*1 , 1„••• ili_ L , , ' "'Ic .......... " ..._ .... i. ..IIIII IN \/ r ` ...._..__.___._ 1 i'' 1 `J • LOCAAN CONCEPT ,a' i1 , ±11 "� .' 1 ., 1 .iii. r, .• \.4 t /le:" _ , •i 1'. ,,Y- 0C30 C13 I emir leara are Ic7E'WA!,k FAR-V.)44 11.Av a t_ 'fl�D&.Vt;L S1rie14 j Kdr 1..At.1E LANE 6o / �, - f= F-.0•Li tt..o W. I OGAN CONCEPT SECTION I , _ I _ I I _ I 111 '41111111in1141- 11-4 !.11-1-+.1- 111-111 I_ JIIIIi --' 111-11i111* 0 - ..... kit " we wa w•i" In NM in WI South 2nd Street Es EN b in . . , in - I- -iii 0 Si r mi . F. ,f, • OW— . -___ illiiirAk . .MM • a .11 41111111101111" 160....- • ' IPl k I' _ g . , • hog _ . . . luil < . i-H 71 • --1 . 14. 1 • . 1 • I g io —i L.... • '. • . ' .,e. i. 11.1 _ _ Ea x Pi s o ? I .. n Z — • L 00 ___LI 0 0 pit - vi ..., _ IE. . 0 - < (r) = X --. t orl) 41111 ----1 1111111%. pilti < , .• MI — 11, ik co yr- < / - All ki CM Ali A [ i .:1111"111. 1.-..:. w,-... Am t% •rN 0 ea 14, , . t tem iii, .. . g •IIIMII____ unimmar.... A '‘iiiiii 3 ik lint .. . awe' 1 Z 0 " s - sioniums. III 14-% DINIUMMINNIMIS% .smilloinai 111- AIIIIIIIIMIIIIINI I ii %,.. -water „ , NINE wromum. •-valtaimil Mid Z in Pelln -1 ' 11111111111 w. .., ......„, _ e _Ili SIUMMIAMIEUIll IIIIIIIIIR I— , __.,. - , Ii.,...... ,,.......... ve— a Twit. _ ... VIIMINS-Inisc,soma! --.4insaimeiemilimill--- 'Mull , emmule X • -1 ""•• .- ..I- mei iiimemit.,. - - .- 11,91t4P .',T"--:: Nt USE 111:411"' , ''' -.k. g. h ;1° gg 1.1.1 • - ,1 L..._. • Ir._ ..,.---....1.-.5•1111112.ZILia.... InW i 1 . ;.141(1,7esiasik r- _ ,.• •-•Aim Tsmi 0 I- -1 _ 4' 10,'---1.FLItAis II r:1 L % i. - • - iitItP ',11 11 1 ii ... ,• •. . ..., , 1 . , r• -4 ,-, %II • 4 -;.. _ , - 0 '- •'1'MI it i. ELI NW __,i :_-, ,..alw_-,.- • - • . -A . 11ft' EC- "---/ -- -:.- iiiesmosnumaiiiim __um _-MaiiMaluilifilliEll 1_ _ _. ,_ - 4 South 3rd Street ...... 111101110 : ,--- r '-'-'—'7"-------7 IL,ilf IIII -III1111 111 - "Till' * 1 1 1 I ill 1 ,— i---, i L , .,...„,_ ,-• ..--, --i `. •-' .. • ---1-I 1 .... -it 0 . .. 1 11.14,1101i (top, Ili . 4 ... i . ...-------- . .A.- , L5' ., 1 ,. __.... I i ( tilli 1 f b 4. • 1 wri1/4X ,0 / 11__. -1_:. c-- ri'1/4. . . • --NJ 1,1 Ti. . ,_,. ..,...: ' • I , 46 ,---1_. . , t:z:( d2, 4 r _. _ "4-, , 01, .iiii -:,--A. .t- j. .‘ - , ..„, „...„,,,,-,. 41 ..bift„, I 1 -, .- 1 1 . , , / C.-•--4 41,ni ' •.-, ,frIs 4 • . i ..s., ------ --- — 0, 0,ira. ..;•,..,_ , .k., _ ,,v0-..- ..iiiihl ), . . .. * _ , 4‘....1W. ';:ep,, • --,_ ---..._ 4 1, - ---------_ 1 IF - ------ -----1 .... a ---""- „ II ---:- - .\ „,----.:7::::- ..,....._ ••••• ___.,...„,,i......;41,,,a.. -_,... 1 4 \ ".i 1111/1111i1 - le' , i 1 11.1',„...:...-------,-_-___ _.--st l'i,',11 --..■ g ii 11'.... • , ' •0: i . ii, ',III 0 "1—.6-1411 -.11'Q I 1%116 . 1.‘ I Alliiii • s-, i , It f I I.,41.-!,. 1 n _ i°.:.---- 4 -77-c"---=-_-6.---',--- •____ . \-1 .1.1 -71,._.z- s,_ . '-' - " it Id ,.- - 1111111111.111111111111 II e i(.. 4. 1 4. I .--..-. . .--.. . _ . 114 I r i t . alig tee''.1!1.1 ...t.-7- 111141111111.1ft 41 • •1•• I .•••` • --3----__......=".- iii.jail .____• _ Wr •-:'11.• SiM• ;IIIMP ., W. : . - • t ' it ---04,10-- . -... 11,- 0. 1_______, \ . 11,,,, v _...., ...., .....- 4 i , _ v_______\ • . \ • ..12,35ima ,---- ,..• .... . -----.......,,, ......... . ..- --4** i .19,00111.11momirmo.n. \\\ ' • ' ''',,,,., '......_ --....• BUFINal—T TO BUS SMC)Fs A t.6 A ' 41 .4.0 'If AlOP lha '.• b 1 I 41" le • 1/1( 1 , ____ ) .----.ia•-•,, 1. 1 ...... „ .,,,,,,,,-;i,. 4r .•,„ ..,,,, o ..--* ' . r‘ 1 11 - larel'irp.a.:t . . la --millikillig4 • _ A .1. 4 , . . fr. ° '-'rk.tw--Ts-------'---- it'\t ( I 'I -- 1 1 I clta r I, L4) :71 4‘' . 4k , 1 . 1 .1 , i I , , itio, . , L , 1 , , .. . 11,0.1/ . . p • . r MOlf * ir 1 " • •• -% -----.4•"!":--- ..,.-.14.1 .1 .1 .11 kablillibh. _ •a , Plfr 0 ilhii illap". ... ..---.."---':".a.••• ••- fr-7r - I ,-, .111 ".11 Pr • it7W-V.-:.:re." ... - •-•ii 's.- ---- " -.'. at ir , , ,..,„„ 7....• A r,,,„„,..,,., ,.. ;,...,,,,i • 1 I t . . • • E, --- py- A(..isrAings•Air - . lerderar . . . ..., . ...... ..-................! __.. •........ ,...--"".1011111111111"... ..................:-i _,. • i 1 -- AIIIIIIII11111111.11111111111 .4444011101......-....... . ........- 11. --C* . ----- '' 1.- • - ---,. --------2-- ! .,, . •• .../..„ • 4,4, , ... ..ini, . .t Noe. 1 1 I I Mid " f' fillf) 0 1111 If 1( 1 (4 .......____:_____________—•----- --.....-;--- r , _ (ii ( ( . t . i t 1 ti t l I €>" F•ife\zzA ---r-c) "KAARKE-r- E3UIL_IDIN‹ -se mi t -1-TEEBEEEEEtil-4-1iErctiaill X am ilm. lg. mom ... olow WPM , 1 -- I Lc4.,Tni.Tr.4111ECI2251-rirlirrrttimrtlirtrtt-rr - sfi- • ..."14 Ili MEI I kk 11111111/ ",,,..zuggis II 1 .. ,__ 1.- -, ..-.—...." ri ..--.. "L.' i I .11. +- .. • ...' ' I , ..-r '0,*4 irk.0. ,e, ,' • r 1".r Ili i .—r-- tb • _ . . , • . ......... . ) ... _ , . 0 4p MI A n r- - illrl lc" n. • i CO3 f.v. II • (7) - ' ' j 1%3 n 0 m no i E, 0. ,,, ,. # ..... . , . . . ,i 4.f • 4 _,. ... __ :.- 0. ill . cn ,r-- .......,...:40 .,,...., _. h iml• ik,a - *-- ...g, . yge cn 9=1 0 p. -1 _4(- 1,..i,.,,,, (DE: ,-•• 11. i 1J I I 1 g I i SI i III I I I I i 1 FX:IZMMMEIM 1 lik.1.13 MU ad CD k ik vsiqi._-4.: ••• ::....m: ,, f =i - cD I •1115.14T4,./i .Z'i:r- r m i t 1 D n ...„, E9215111.1h Sle, : var.:4.•-* .• .:":1. mum • 141111[1.4811- .a... rm riri rinl I Nvilla,11. : ...: ,...:11 'Ler..... , HI I I 1(---1 CI 1 '..,: 'Ll.s.....4,....1, - er..ap."41...........e..i.-....-!tri...rw..., ,.... ,.. ,...„ ... .,,-if. .t.o., r ,., „.(z. e :...... k 81 -- OMB Logan ..= 1 7 !!! Ave. So. \\ -- 1 • i • II, a 1 I 1 1 \* 1,_ I I •- - % CI „ 71 0 _ . t ., ,,..4;.viiw-E --.'i il;IP.sec.'-' l • •4 a' 'il li.r , I.4* — =" i: . . •. la :lit. i or:. i I ,... r l• ( 1410,- _ ..- ••• 1 fill , , d P.. gi. • te C .011.• MD gIN 1 1 a 1 g= I °'' I — ..........* • I ...: 7 liq II lin* — ^ • /*- ii est ' • --, \ i 1 I ,.. -. I . .i rc 1 1 -0 - . ' I , It NJ. • ,..-__ - 1 4114 INIFY •111=4,t,„..'.(c....ti ' - -it ti' . einirls we - MIMI -- •-• ais - dIPI .r son=ra-s. a ....• ; AN•i i r* .--.1*, 4 . .: . • 6 - r ,-1" - • - . \ D., , .,_ ri., Burnett Ave. So. e_... ..._, , - - ' - • Burnett Avenue South ,.o a , _. 27. „A_ if ........_, • :III, , _ ,i. ..,.....0"'"' ‘ ANL Ilaw • 1 " 191 LVI 1,•.y+ ... V ..''.. "“ ''' ("If "i'f-1--r-l',. r.-tri• t: -.-- , Jr -- 4.- .,..oliv ' 2:- ' . ',me • " i, , \ om i.tr: Riii 1 , 1 .10 ".. ts.i.' , $r 1 . 62,:fi ! _,.••••••••••matiaMaaaa: Ian lllll 101 Ni, iih - I' f - mi a 4 FT • „ ......, ..„- 6 r. 11 '' ' r ":". • ‘ \ — -- ift e I, i 44 11= ill - , _ 4 1 2. I ll ihrt12224. ..:t_t_i.t ...tigle.lll..%•,:olaiiIS 2 2 \ i Z ‘ :-. A. -- r. - - IULLIII 1/1111111 F \ (I) DOWNTOWN c=7.PE PLAN limitmishomiio. 8CAL_E 1" — 60' — --,1 , 7,-- , / •'N '' / ' \ \ ''' ti 44 •"-.--' ',.i. / . -.. .. 's ,ir... `. • / . \----Le / -- \ \ I ir', : ' N,4•• 4. 4-• 1: / / \ \ _ , ..1 - \ \ / i ‘7, A , '.....w v. • . lir ''- '.1 b I 4 , 7 ii40 4. Ni i tS1 . . A. —) i' i /ft% ,i ... , • , _ ......_t , t •. _ , .. -7. ': - , \ , \ _. \\:1 '....., / ' .;'. 4 i • -:- - - ,.—fs • ' ce..,,.. - vr , . • \ •, \ • \ .E. .-.. , :., . ‘.. ,,,__ . , /,/. ., Av 0 .4 / -.\ • • , \ •- , I •111•7.# • - \ . ' / ' '-‘',-''' ' ao, •, ' „i• . - N. i,.. 1 011, . .• it , 0.41- 4 ° ill< , , 1/4 I/ '•1/4,ill •:.MIMI& 4° 4 D. , Ar, 4 „, 6,p, , ,,,,,,,.... , , . . , ,, ..,,v ,,. ‘41,1,..,..ow Sr , .4,.. • al i.4. -N x vw 1 . , , ' I . ,r1 1/4/4", 0- It • s r . I t, / .,:-. , _ a_al. , i \ ' A ,.. . ‘. • '-*". 0' •.,, \, I,/ / r- , •a,„,, ..t.- i 'Or , 0 , '''' .‘ '',;arAw, . . Al r"'' ' - — I -' 1 I ,I 0 " N‘ 1 Ihe •Vet ', / 7, • • / *.....r.T.eVrt f , _____ , . . er• .„ -.=e • •1.0 4. •, ,/ , ? i• ' i , 4... .. . 11/4'.-- , 4..4.-- ,.41,..i.„, • A- .ViriT ‘,___ - - >-.7 AK t. ' • '4, T. A,. , ‘...i: %--- ..:.;w0,..2. _. . . / 4, 4:4:ill c t.. tp '1. a' \ • lob './- '_ ,-.. . ars ;. , -,4 • • - • . - 0 „. v., e, , LU! > J 1 - 4 :y ` dri 4.1 Ntilk, , . , - ., v, ,,,_ u. ci...- .. .1\ - "*„.illik.„-, ..a.7„, , ' 4.\ I 1„loc. '7 .L.— • . I r--Ci • • Yid 4..st 11/40 . .r : 1.NS4b:'10:-, " • ' v ' Cist 45 4 r. %--/\N4C --4_,•,,_::."±.t..,A_..•k?..,,-• 1..,,,.A,. ,.:A.- -, , 'c-,• . . 4 o.iSe''';•.'-".•.1..'.'.,,, # 47)0j.k ,. y 4 . . , 6 *4 , - -4 : , 1 .,.,,.. t_- •. ir • t, 46,° .0. - t. ) \ i -, e. 4:41 4 Ces, - ' •. ' ---- '.-A• i ,-- ' • / 0. . I . IT . 4 k 4. • 414 ---i, , _ti\t\, . Qiiiiii...\iis , . . ilk , 5,1,P5eil 4 f \ „, , 1'1 , ,..si It..." ; ..44?-- 4" '' i . 4 11'‘' iirml.‘ y "tit '�rr .) ...+1i �1 4 ,PA, .. i� r,441t,* 1111; ' 4 .4 flY\41,* ' ' 4 'ifv, ‘ ' ' ,dir - _ - ‘ t`f? - - . c, _ . ,ip- Z ' . ,,„.0111...h-- ,'1.,,,.......'‘` 4,0,;)\' .. 114'...4. ' 14 .400reir ' - "..IIC -"7:41041re."" vi• il ,, Vkli .-+, ,,, ... . . r, 4101--; C , I. al - - t ..�J^ L1it LA t t ( - i . P IF ... ii Ilir .\k•'r,''A.•-!,,':11,o'--•( ..%.- .."t1.,. I...A.. ,_k'_-_-.\...I.....-„,..•-:............... \ T i r r •T i •1 4_ ram ' e•. ' .-ram k, .:„.,. .... ___... , \ ....,v. `;` • " VIIIIII ------________, )111.www, ik ' •4edillilWk )=. PIAZZA TO UALLY PROJECT EENTRANJCF .._, --.. ... . ---....„„ ______ . if'- #1111 (•.1111 _ if. _,_-...'N'N-..,: ,.... .. ,-- \ --.----- . -• . N:.. -.04fi ilika L.- - !- ,--- ...... ___ 4.. ..,„ .., 10a ,,:jaist EL*7 1111414. ions - , 7 ,. — 1.4 . . • •,--1.—ii1 ,, 1111Wili 0110 _ 0000100000101111P. , r , je t -------., ( re:fib, A ' ,4 - . .-.•11 IMAM ..e4tat • rq ,ifi 41" it. • ' I aid! w ...i if ( . .,-,,.... 1. .... .4.,.. a at 1 .,1 ..1 . - 1, , - ------ 1 - — „ 1 lb 11 I 7..ir file - ...Or . ... -:-. 1 , 1 4 ID, ....74, ,. ,:r 1 , ,..., ., ' pow 4k Ike . 111 .... r • / In,. ., a. ar C. 1 , "-.: - 1 •• IF_____ ,,,r • • r A .1141I L . i I ite-- ..,,,,.. . - •,) , -, _____1 ''---— .- - :.,, - 1 i ip ‘ •' I ' "Mir . -... ,r ,, , ir 1, I , .- . 11 • : - 1 I 1 iiir. • , ...wMIN • IM, - . 100/11/111 11 6447.1i I di . . -1 • k 1 ' i eon I l-niii inj 411•:.% -- -. WORM f••••• ISM ,ip,.:. - - 7..2-....-- -..................A.=r,IL-. 111=0,.....00411.111.11.1.111! 11.11"11116'".""111111111.1111.11111"."'".. I • t ,vilf7imor. gioiliflowit ::: ::: - -------. 1--7 p . _ Cep 1-R A N S I-T- C a NT IE Fi 1 ( LD A L_L_Y F:'R C),J EE c -T. G N00'300'W 103ID1' rm / 6 K ,a a o o LI e ,r / Ef ^ �mj nµ...... I24 lz N� " / / /i / \r� Im v 8 a § / Xi / , -0 , 1 W / r ..,, / co ' m n ^� g" W I m / // c _ r n g" D I Z // ' f // ".�^ 5" nB , / v - / a"- �d nny ° 5" m na / ,a . ;IQ 0 I'/ e.X. ..r.-- - �n V00'U'00 W i I / U :^ nn " n / g o 11 0 / n ne I na Nn / / gn 16.94 •� IBM,'/ N00'03'0�j ^ I 2 VW / n� g" I —/ S^ /*, f3)'' \ , -\\:. &n 1 !It*�'0� ; y IP 0/ } 1a - tfi? ( i ift ,..• , 1 , AZ I mi, u0Lf03'10'W 12059' I ` L r J is,. e M\KAA\9?\97013\RM-12-1 10-15.1097 125.147 Wer'rsteticrtJNL m KTH RENTON 100 DATE BY oescwPnon v Architects LS N i Z 13400 Norr p Way Fast,Suite 30 APARTMENTS • T IA co Bellevue,Washngton 98005 I• A m (425)401-6828 x Fax(425)401-0630 RENTON.WA • • II ° 1 11 II Ip l/I l� li' I "4 III III II III 1111 11y1 II 1 • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONSULTANTS INDEX OF DRAWINGS a PARCEL A ARCHITECT': ARCHITECTURAL 'A' y A ECTS y / rI9 LOTS 6•1,BLOCK L S0IT]LRS SIXTH ADDITION TO TUE TOLL OF D40m NORTWP WAY EAST,SUITE 30 p S! .p4�� 1 NTON.ACCORDNG TO THE FLAT Tu=_REOF,REmFcm M BEuewE WA 9emz5 SECTION 0 PROJECT INFORMATION •m• n Y� • vOLunE]6 OF P.4.i9,PKE a1,M KIK.COUNtt,WASHMGTOY SCOIT6425,�Td,'EBY A0.1 TITLE SLEET/GENERAL NOTES TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE ALLEY ADJACENT TO SAID SECTION 1 SITE INFORMATION m LOT 6 PLATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDINANCE NUMBER 2115 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: AU SITE PLAN •✓/ R440 �' LIMICH ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW. CT ENGNEERING - j•{� 1 0 NICK,.ON STREET,SUITE UM. SECTION 2 BUILDING PLANS Q SITEPARCEL C CHARLES GRIFFIITOH9 A2.I GARAGE LEVEL PLAY C (2062 285-4512 d]3 PLAZA/LEWL R-I PLAN LOTS]THROUGH 5,INCLUSIVE.BLOCK I.MOTOR LINE ADDITION A23 LEVEL R-1 PLAY TO RENTON,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT TNEREOF,RECORDED INCIVIL ENGINEER: A]A LEVEL R-3 PLAN 9 OF PUTS.RAGE 50,M KING caWtt,w400440 OIL • DODOS ENGINEERS SECTION 3 UNIT PLANS VOLUME42051aeTH AVE9.T SUITE 200 BELLEWE,W4 NJ WITS 4 d1..Al FLOOR PLANS OBR2CE IT DODDS A33 WWITS B.131.,B3 FLOOR PLAYS Z (4]5)E DODDl A3A WITS C,CI B3 FLOOR 03 FLOOR PLANS 0 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBERS OEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: a3s WITS c3,4 uFLocRPu CI 6 CONSULTANTS,GEOTECH _ dab WIT9D I DI FLOOR PLANSZi B]56 NE 20TH STREET,SUITE 16 A3-1 IT D]FLOOR RAN PARCEL A 0035-ma BE.WA0036 MARC R C)MC�INv 5 SECTION 5 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 566 �I C)PARCEL C 560m 000-m6 (2 06 2 141-5 618 A455J EAST,SOUTHEAST,4 9OUTML£ST ELEVATIONS rI EST ELEvA e VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS: NORTH cNcia LAUGHLIN R BETHUNE ASSOCIATES SECTION 8 BUILDING ON Z [-. RENTON 100 �n4 H42B 66TH AVENUE SOUTH,SUITE 0-106 A61 BUILDING SECTION A-A I•s KENT,WA 95031-1U3 f-I SOD RN.VNAPDWO LAUGHLIN RBETHWE SECTION B STAIR 8 LOBBY PLANS&SECTIONS O MOW 251-0455 A91 LLOBBY OBBY LEvEL I SURVEYOR: ns3 LOBBY LEVEL 3 L v DOD INFERS A94 LOBBY LEVEL a �T P�M BE05 NeTH AVENUE,SUITE 200 L� LLEVUE.WA 95001 Ir 1 Q PROJECT DATA • 5B DODDS 611 CIVIL •CR C-I UTILITIES W PROJECT. RENTON 00 ADDRESS. 300 BLOCK.LCGAN aVE a LANDSCAPE 'L' g RENTO N WA 95.5 CLIENT/DEVELOPER. DALLY HOMES,INC. L-I LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN 3316 PMWIAN AVENUE EAST,SUITE ILO L-2 PARTIAL LANDSCAPE FLAN-PLAZA 1 EATTLE.WA 9802 L-3 PARTIAL LANDSCAPE RAN-PLAZA] CHARLIE LABODA PH n06)32E-3110 FAX(206)3.-6909 LAND USE BUILDING DATA ALLOWED/READ PROPOSED SPACE LEVEL 0 PLAEA LEVELS 11.1.aL W3 LAND USE ZONE CM-MIXED COML MIXED USE PARKING ST/nA(E STAIR/ELEV. COMMERCIAL -EXTERIOR RESIDENTIAL COVNM CORE RESIDENTIAL GARAGE TECH LOBBY RETAIL COURT BUILDING BUILDINGS BUILDING ITn UNITS BLDG WITS SITE AREA N/A RETAIL,39633 SF.F LIVING (DECKS ITOTAL ICGHMON I TODG LIvCG DECKS(TOTAL IUNITSD°""�' I TOTAL LIVING (DECKS(TOTAL ID''"'''I TBODAL 12 a08 0 000144 c s 3 R 1 R-I R f0 LOT COVERAGE UNLIMITED TUT- TYPE I-FR TYPE I-FR TYPE v-I HR TYPE I-F2 N/A TYPE v-I Idi TYPE v-I OR TYPE v-I HR o m NAKLNUM BLDG/1EIONT 15' 61 SQUARE FOOTAGES -TOTAL U 0 g V BLDG.SETBACK NONE REOD (GROSS SCUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA/USE) 3B)11 2,13 2341 4519 FLOOR AREA m 4 aa�1 N IL m"' e./el R-I 14492 9388 499 bBBI 3894 BIM] 359 9231 2R36 1581 T3D 1533 X cel 5-2 9025 1550 10,415 2818 11543 933E 9.552 2269 11501 1642 1533 8531 31861 T 0 PARKING(ONSITB PARKING EN 0-LEVEL) Level R-3 9026 150 116 2119 11205 9235 144 2269 64a LARGE(85.X 10U 31 Total 11,439 3635 31018 8801 1150T 3 00 69 l-a] 459 aC55 44513 n G t COMPACT(B'616, ALLOWABLE AREAS, UNLIMITED! WLMITED ' 10500 UNLIMITED -6300 2T33B 18a1 3a51] Ib96 599 D U Z 3 BARRIER FREE 1 l •5P.RILL/.SPRINKLED BUILDING W i a]mmm O9 63mOq C L (VEA TYPE A•U P (65'ISX 16.TO Is, tc o3N BARRIIER FREE/VAN I I UNIT DATA UNIT COUNT Y Q 3 IO V (OFF SITE) WIT DEEC AREA TYPE BUILDIN PARALLEL) (6F) FLOOR R- - OTAL R R 2 R 3 R-] C T - - TOTAL OTAL(ONSITE PARKING 1 145 A STUDIO,1 BATH 513 1 1 1 1 3 T LANDSCAPEDARPA Al STUDIO,1BATH 552 0 3 0 m 0 3 8 g PERIMETER•A LEVEL I NOT 1070 I 115 SF. 42 STUDIO,1 BATH 5 ] 1 ] 10 8 L PLAZA/R-I VEL NOT REOD 5,464 SF. I BR 1 BATH 612 a a m A 2 6 4 2 el 1 BR I BATH 22 SITE FLAN SET 3 BRIBA11 6V 2 ! 1 wTE (x:r E.DST 01 2 BR 1 BATH 1 I RENTON MF I BR,DEN,I BATH — G ]BR I BATH _ 0E2 04 2BR 1BdTH .5 3 a 01 1 BR BATH 9� 1 A0.1 3 BR 2 BATH W213 ; 02 3 BR 2 BATH ION 1 1 " TOTALS B G O 39 14 1+ Al m 10 0 30 36 31 31 110 97013 MIMING COMMERCIAL70 REMAIN I I I 'ALLEY SECONDARY ' .DARADE fq.! ENTRY 0 I:'1 (�l' rxror t�fi.) -11y,r -f ii I rn+'( (s,.(.K� , i� •.I IH Ib.l{ _ SJ �-r l rA q�iw, — Tir rt-vr(r a ; -- • — .. I!4 _ PROPOSED MIXED USE BUILDING _ I 1 .,►�( (n•�tcrs ,,,,�� ` • _ , .'._"I �� '-_.- DEVELOPMENT BY DALLY HOMES h,.,lh H�bAY.S .�o4 i. ONSIDE SUBJECT PROPERTY UNEJ MAIN RETAIL -1 /��, ENTRY .1:1 AiA� ratalG (MY11y 171 d E.. y n n.AYA.I Y150d W 1,4) v - M1-...-v sSNi 0.� J • Coolirt4 i I p ' ''''''1/4,;14% 1.'" / IAA 945P i 7 S 4.-'-\. TLI IP / / i 41"-'s -c.zzt / '0 i / /:... eft' D1. . 1 , //>, 7/2., /7 i ,/,,/ 0 . . . :„..........„. 1 / /j TINO RETAIL / r .. IAIJ�SC6.(i i.e. (LLJ� • -o W 11- / ::-.. gk. .. .// /i/ /TO RENNN / :' - :e .0 /../ ,„//, / , ... , .. , . _. --„, f =ALE,r•...V j 1gb / / j-A�Ji PuK M1w - • ►ROPOeAI.FOR OFT.SR[DEVELOPMENT ��• I RENTON kW RESPONSIBBJTY OF CITY OF RENTON ' (OUTSIDE SUBJECT PROPERTY UNEJ it-1 L...LI.R.k*...Au.N.le •l wA.ww. - 'wmmo•YU • •..a .y.+A.l.a.mom uu A. Ir,nww • • • ►'' iC . !° UNIT Al UNIT Al " _UNIT•Al _ -• U B3 UNI UNIT A2 UNIT A2 B . .q• r,�> ,,�� ,' �[►J imp ... • _ . mg-- • ->,- 'l .- ,, • , .-.-" - -,.., . '-�� !11>� sir - I _:1 ; I • ':, :..: . ,, _ - ,a� MK J I - { ••�I S,L4-r -3-^ I i - i � •• j•ti( ••,1 .X;i.,;;•, �i+ ) ��y; _ •�,. ::"(..• "') l " • . .. '%J.J'y).x(>X,,1, ..t DECIDUOUS PLANTiNO DETAIL- R Y�/ 111, .• '.�..�• '• .r�y p��- 4 . , X",.!/)(� - -- -... - •'�� , .V. ,•. ..1 - i. I ( ��-10 r fib', 0/1 � • cir • • . • UNIT B1 _• ... • �; y '•l �' �' �fy' UNIT A a .�• - v . . UNIT A UNITA T B1 �`al ��- •rMP • ir. . ` w ..3� '■ • � _ i ��•/��`"� UNIT-A y� o a _ _ ,�.....:_ ` III•,--", _ .81 ` i. l �o_� .:'$/� .z. .' , rice . • -6^ I 1� I lii",?► mkpl d dit :!:-Q,' ip lSi .=-'-- " fir- .. • - Z CONIFER PLANTING DETAIL - ' it -•• . i mm_mi,"' I' i I'•%y:-.f' ,09. .II b , � • UNIT D .�'1. Ib'%•; 3iii�: ` 13�'9s. k'ugf�ro /ey"� I� i ',may • H i � f�. �i:� crop �;1 �•.Ii o,T o` -a ��I,.�,,,,, IT A Ti $ ,r� '� �1�� ~ki. i - �Y• DOS � �� _ �'� x 4.1 eifit � ..� t� �'aoeorwlw►; =arca`o:,.o �. o.� • ;.,< ,•,<;,'i�;•;:;: ,i1. , I :.p %6" a.. '•4i �, I��OMI mmi�..�8118.. fin- -,�:� i 'O p`�'*� .F` ♦�, �1, �irO da ",7�a �a.�`�7 X+'a'~ ,Jl _ :,... of .i tu= ,q,T y--r• r i 't3' '� P~PLANTING \Q.. _ '�f[,ir)�.1`tn��i/L/I +s"?rt..� y i� fl 1 --L• ,•lr' 11/ ASHRUB LANTIN .•?,�,�„I��j¢i��i(� J 1.. il�'7I� I/ * �7 ( • ; ^ !�� ,,, UNIT C •• _ t� o o �, .v,.. I{ 1 5 o �1�\,h 0.UNIT C I-° Q -y::;,•.,.:� ; ra .-w. �..`. .R fultRlw� --era . •..w •. _�:,.. ti. t, i ac of C.�� ixf IMA.'11li �r'e p° `� - pq•nAb 1•d+lt7,off 11441 Imrt°"� GROUND COVER PLAPrI•D4C DETAIL • : ; %, RAI- 2 A f. ,1 11r �'rS �� UNIT 61tat:41-Aelk,„.„- -,--iiiy.,,e.4.''n Ij rag f �' ��,,;�• d• : ) 1 ' /4 a' ��°r/' ,-0'""6`�j�r . itI NIT A^ L4,...meill".1 I'' 1�� .��L�� •, ''/C Yf''`y�� Il err• m"'Ib miI - i-740• UNIT 61 �.. � i '��.:.� Ili• - .�� , orl: P .°f� 'rr /Li r + '°� UNIT B1 `a UNIT B1 ��°'rr'ea� 1 [low,�I. ,�fr.�...e o u,cT rt:1 o a % / '"'� ' �,, /l��',�„: -•wir,uii,�-el.�+leng/�i UNIT B1 ^ % fA. /P ,!1.• la trM:1 1/11.1 0 —Watt _ ..•.inl • t--"r'S .i7`� ,� 1 �, / ///, ,� •b0'ri.,444hir-OZIME4111111111 'ii .7' Z ,1 /.411likt '/'\ /A:A _.got,-_. �1•+I y� n�. r Ifi�!t• ..`T?R4 �':;-tee1 �✓�'% 'jr % � ni Sil .fR/' O"1�'�**77 1�/� qp'� ;i u� �^ W a • i limb / -A' - : ,-fih Ia4i i ft iim W "" i ' . • � / . ' pp��,, i11.i ,.i9b..1%Ai,4_i1 1..°,rs UNITD /1 _' �e�(•'_.. /i ,w ‘ ,0,—may%�11. -..V ------._.. ----- '-r=c;IToti-..11,1.....ii-.:- --...... ...-- --. . -Ai,--t-a WA. if#.'•,--3,,-,-*•,ei mo,Vagleva.ti , i imr.—/ . .. 1/1) .4,1" lrtl) '" b.!' /1,1 4),;),I,A g.,,er,4-- „,R 1 '' ••64-,0 iffq-co '#1/4.0*IrAitoplif ill%A , / *7, ei lipitterer , , . . ,,, .r ,,.„.?,..., .44., *it 4,.,‘ , -..........I I• , ..:. ,1:)....,...... ,... ,,e,,,. ). . . _., . _ .„,.___, •../...,,,,, .t....,_. . , -.2„0. --- ,\ ,: . 0 ,u,T., • Alit him,,., o.- '�/am,. I et��„r ilF i; , ;re c ` " :� Al � ,' 14,..p.., -r Y< g8 I:of1 �///// ai LEASE , r .. _ .�ro`�`I/-A � n...41. ..NN M,„, ,,�acf=half♦1- _. _. .. __ _ - �ZA-J s__ _ ..r..._ / F.h}�`'r(!i_.I II�XP % f'AT bTi� ANAGE• RE—ON Mf • w '' ---' COMP eroa 6 BUILDING 'C' wi BUILDING 'B' Hi BUILDING 'A' 0 o _/�/� _ 93=3 /�/�_ g � ® — N 4 TOP a rare m'0 II ER \ �lam'-7 Vd ,Q mm —V .90.acn w "EEI ® ?PLAZA 2 f ,�, F-F�AI — LAZA * — Y rw 0l/d' C HHH LEE OO!! HHH 1 �` RPR O O ® OEM 51.8. ±CP G Pt SLAB TD.SLAW 17P-1-i- 1 I °MANCEtT _Au., 1 J _/�47'-6' E. v<aa..SLAW f `- Sf.sLRe dT.3423M,dL Z 4.1 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION c a CITY OF SEATTLE PIPELINE RO.W. 2 m SCALE:I/16'•1'-0• 1, z E. m asn 32' 1/"'I- W OE. X a Za W a C4 BUILDING 'A' BUILDING 'A' o 3-8. /� ELEVA204 T. .r A Bl'-3rAa3=T IXX is B.3 63' u d uaLmLE Err y OP6MATE �Tgil R 'lmall M iCr OF PLATE 23 vB-7 Vd' l__,Ste.:VB' _ i'Z, F 6 3j ® ® ^5B'-9 U8' N a omi S m1Ty la. - I�TT��1 T1 �I I�I�-I I"7� ��Tcr of sisRoaa �- 3 I Ii � }�-5�.-d. FIR 11 ®® „'®®. ®® ®e n_I 1 1 1_I.VT_1171 EB® ® ®_II!1� 5l�-B. =t yN ___ _ oPaP BLAB — —I I-- — I��I— IS I—,I I—I I YGP SLAB Z r/■I _ _ 3'-3 Vi'HKaHEST y mum '-ram r� - , - — /�EXI6TING GWOE y 30 v iW R 3,0 V0 20301 TA,.6LRa.,20EL 0.3 Ci PT 5W.aTA4 SOUTHEAST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION MAIN ENTRANCE LOGAN STREET SITE PLAN SET LT MIE: CCT.S.se] SCALE:I/16'•I'-0. SCALE:I/16'•1'-0' ® ® .,? RENTON MF 0 a' 16' 37• 0 EP K' 30 . ! A5.1 97013 BUILDING 'C' Z 0 _ `3 L�// rw 3 r E E E ® I—T-1 1 l m ®'III 1OP CF H--I m �� g E E E LB IDE14.El] ® a O REFLOCR m. El E ® ®® i EE ®® 1I ow. , a oP es Pr s1Ae r I f ., - t a.SL AB , .E•a< WEST ELEVATION z MORRIS STREET SCALE:1/16'•I'-O' O 0 Be II h E. Zz z O W F" a Z e W g BUILDING 'A' A BUILDING 'B' hi BUILDING 'C' o 1 08 93'.3' ,., o el'-3' U S n ri r nl s+ Mn• 1 7 Mi I I�.I 10�- 3i T rr 9 a ,e'-21/5 3' ICH III II Iffi! Fig Rl;+.� ��!r l't' :IL I. it 11' fN i Ian WI e^!y' EED ""*E �oeP'-o TB' •�L'c .� iIgi 11.1kA o - ®® ®EE II. II®® ®® w®®I®E_9 n®® ®®NI MI_ ®® ®® T ' v" a A a, TOP CFPT 5,0 Y Q 3 m� I I I I I / FRIO!OR COCIF) `� T`i ��TA.5!AE ,EXR oOOR Y vA 0.r..d< SITE PLAN SET NORTH ELEVATION 6 WE OCT.4raw ALLEY w RENTON MF m®SCALE:IIli I'-0' J C•^ G/ 97013 • SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION P • p N89'15'15"E 7783' ✓I 9A-��I 99I P Exit o mJ I�-�//1� ,+N89'1515"E 1540I' ,UI .� ` / 689'56'40"E 10001' Trash CCCLCCCCL 7 21 CCCC CCCCCCCC c c, c° Trash a ❑ c c4 d 33 a >.c Elev.Lobby C 3 p i o o c c c E o c D c c T • z c N Ir 0, m. b> / n1 . 9B c c ❑. ,9E 3 Elev. 0 � fx (n ac 'j�� "IX � i.Stor. 0 Ct „c Tenant A, r—I O Storage 30 (I) En ( °j L=9 RETAIL Sec c c +s ff ,, ° c A i,e Q O 4 c we Ca E. Hi C4 \ •Se j0„� C C 53 s¢ —STORM % c N7 I e SEWER lQ,5, C 624 CONNECTION L < < V////A u 61. 0 K Y 5 � 0j of Parki Ent. 1 , d'"/4 6'SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION UTILITY PLAN ATfR pIpFCINE R \ �� ` o' °"mLL GARAGE LEVEL I 0•W I', I ohm 9� r SCALE: 1 16 - 1' 0• 'Aql - �` \ . ®T of:, N71 Se30• I. 1p5,1 WATERLINE CONNECTION(6•?) DATE:OCT 15.1997 RENTON ME STORM SEWER CONNECTION C 1 97013 DODDS ENGINEERS. INC. 7� DO JOB B97095 [.5]E655-mn �a PERFECTION TIRE PARTNERSHIP 2 7 BIG FIVE HOLDINGS INC \ WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR CHILD 602 E 2nd Ave 2525 E El Segundo Blvd PO Box 88948 Spokane, WA 99202 El Segundo, CA 90245 Seattle,WA 98138 1 — �- 1 — - RENTON LUTHERAN CHURCH r RENTON LUTHERAN CHURCH 1 Mary Ann Putman 200 Whitworth Ave S#01143- 200 Whitworth Ave S#01143- 505 S 2nd Vac St Renton, WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 ,WA l — f M Hadi Fakharzadeh r Vera Jean Mathews Vera Jean Mathews PO Box 78404 10415 SE 174th St#5268 10415 SE 174th St#5268 Seattle,WA 98178 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 \ 2 — — — Thomas Williams ( SCI MANAGEMENT CORP Linda Christine Crosby&Randy Carman 13329 SE 253rd P1 1929 Allen Pkwy 2601 NE 23rd KI nt,WA 98042 Houston,TX 77019 Renton, WA 98055 I SALVATION ARMY Civic Theatre Renton Curtis&Shelley Olosky PO Box 9219 PO Box 1556 504 S 3rd St Seattle,WA 98109 Renton,WA 98057 Renton,WA 98055 > = Rest-Inc Sunlite ' BIG FIVE HOLDINGS INC SUNLITE RESTAURANT INC 509 S 3rd St 2525 E El Segundo Blvd 509 S 3rd St Renton,WA 98055 El Segundo, CA 90245 Renton, WA 98055 _2 -- 1 CITY OF RENTON Mary Jane LaJoy CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Ave S 13784 Marchant Ave 200 Mill Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Sylmar, CA 91342 Renton,WA 98055 CI - — — — — r TY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Ave S 233 Burnett Ave S 200 Mill Ave S Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 -- - 2 John&Emily Adams Elizabeth Picini CITY OF RENTON 7548 S Sunnycrest Rd 1813 NW 77th St 233 Burnett Ave S Seattle,WA 98178 Seattle,WA 98117 Renton,WA 98055 r CITY OF RENTON i WASHINGTON MUTUAL SVGS BK 1 ' Lorraine Jasper 233 Burnett Ave S 1191 2nd Ave#950 30925 Webster Rd E Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98101 Eatonville, WA 98328 1 _2 -- 2 - PERFECTION TIRE PARTNERSHIP 2 CITY OF RENTON RENTON LUTHERAN CHURCH 205 Logan Ave S 200 Mill Ave S 200 Whitworth Ave S#01143- Renton, WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 — — l CITY OF RENTON rTimothy Searing Stanley Fernyhough 200 Mill Ave S 211 Morris Ave S 10008 Rainier Ave S Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98178 I \ _ / r John&Patricia Rankin Stephen&Abby Chick rBeverly Ann Blackwell 423 S 3rd St 618 Smithers Ave S 215 Whitworth Ave S Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 FIRST CH OF CHRIST SCIENT Linda Schroeder D M&C E Christenson 220 Whitworth Ave S#01134- 4012 S 158th St#F 4012 S 158th St#G Renton,WA 98055 Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98188 Melanie -- J i elanie Hudson - 11 40,12 S 158th St#H Seattle,WA 98188 I i' ---- —— i q�- I55, SIA •% >; CIT'3F RENTON Mayor Jesse Tanner • July 16, 1998 Mr.Don Daily °Daily Homes 3316 Furhman Ave E, Suite 100 Seattle,WA 98102 SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION EAST OF MORRIS IN RENTON,WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Daily: This letter is to inform you that it is necessary for you to move the entrance of your parking garage to South Morris Street. Due to unforeseen circumstances, the City has not been able to timely obtain use of the Seattle pipeline right-of-way and access across the Big 5 strip and cannot determine the exact date when these rights-of-way will be available for vehicular use. The City will continue to actively pursue these rights-of-way. Therefore, you are directed to move your driveway from the Seattle pipeline location and have the garage entrance and exit from South Morris Street. Sincerely, 4itylGsG �wL-� ames C.Hanson Development Services Director Cc: Gregg Zimmerman Sue Carlson Larry Warren Jay Covington Mayor Tanner • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)235-2580/FAX(425)235-2532 C 7 Thic n,nar rnnrn inc&1`'.!ra..r•i�....,.e.,-, �noi,,,�.n.,..�,,....,. February 23, 1998 Renton City Council Minutes Page 63 Mayor Tanner added that if Newcastle chooses not to annex this property, Mr. Clarke can then build according to Renton's zoning and regulations, as long as he holds title to the property. Susan Boyd, Penhallegon Associates, 750 Sixth St. S., Kirkland, WA, stated that the City of Newcastle has retained her firm for consulting services related to the annexing of this property. Saying this proved that Newcastle is serious about this matter, she added that Newcastle judges the moratorium to be important. Karin Blakley, 2112 NE 50th St., Renton, WA, 98056, strongly supported continuing the moratorium. Mike Florian, 2120 NE 50th St., Renton, WA, 98056, also supported the moratorium, saying that it is both correct and justified and that Newcastle is committed to pursuing annexation of this area. Gary Adams, Mayor of the City of Newcastle, stated that Newcastle would try to assist Mr. Clarke in any way possible in an effort to assure that everyone in this area is treated fairly. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. EDNSP: Declaration of This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published DT-Area Surplus Property in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Tanner opened the public (Sale to Daily Homes Inc) hearing to consider declaring certain City-owned property to be surplus for CSC the purpose of sale to Daily Homes, Inc. for development of a mixed retail �� JJ and residential structure; property consisting of 1.2 acres located west of Logan Ave. S., east of Morris Ave. S., and between South 2nd and 3rd Streets. Sue Carlson, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Administrator, explained that in 1995, the City purchased several parcels of property in downtown Renton that were vacated when auto dealerships moved to the Automall at Rainier and Grady. The property was envisioned to be used for parking, a plaza or town square, and a transit center. Since then, the City has determined that the approximately 1.2 acre parcel located between Logan and Morris Avenues is not needed for the planned public improvements. The proposal is to declare this property surplus and sell it to the private sector for development of market rate housing. Continuing, Ms. Carlson said in February of 1997, the City advertised a request for proposals from private developers to build a mixed use retail and residential project on this piece of property. After reviewing the proposals and conducting interviews, Daily Homes was selected as the best potential developer for the site. The development proposal includes 110 high-end apartments built over one level of structured parking, and 4,600 square feet of retail space. Audience comment was invited. Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11th Pl., Renton, 98056, asked what was meant by the term "market rate" housing. Ms. Carlson replied this indicates the residential portion of the project will not be subsidized; instead, the market alone will determine the price of the units. She estimated the monthly cost will be between $750 and $1,000 per unit. February 23, 1998 Renton City Council Minutes Page 64 • MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL SUSPEND ITS RULES AND ADVANCE TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON THIS SUBJECT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report regarding the proposal to EDNSP: Declaration of declare certain City-owned real property as surplus. The City purchased DT-Area Surplus Property certain real property for various municipal purposes, that property generally (Sale to Daily Homes Inc) being located east of Morris Ave. S., south of S. 2nd St., north of S. 3rd St., and west of Logan Ave. S. Because of the acquisition of other properties and the finalization of plans concerning other municipal developments in this area, portions of the City lands are or may become surplus. The purpose of declaring this property surplus is to sell it to a developer, Daily Homes, Inc., for construction of a mixed-use retail and housing complex. The legal description of this property is: Parcel A - Lots 6 and 7, Block 1, Smither's Sixth Addition to the Town of Renton, together with that portion of the alley adjacent to said Lot 6 vacated by City of Renton Ordinance No. 2779, which attached by operation of law. Parcel B - Lots 2 through 5, inclusive, Block 1, Motor Line Addition to Renton. The Finance Committee recommended that Council approve the resolution declaring certain City-owned property as surplus, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign such documents as necessary to transfer title thereto to Daily Homes, Inc. or its assigns. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 67 for resolution.) CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. CAG: 98-005, Downtown City Clerk reported bid opening on 2/11/98 for CAG-98-005, Downtown Water Main Replacement, Water Main Replacement; nine bids; engineer's estimate $494,898.89; and DDJ Construction submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, D.D.J. Construction Co., Inc., in the total amount of $392,874.62. Council concur. Rezone: Austin Site (800 City Clerk submitted request from the applicant of the Austin Site Rezone SW 16th St), R-97-161 (3.2 acres located at 800 SW 16th St., File No. R-97-161) that this matter be held in abeyance until approximately March 16, 1998, to allow completion of negotiations with a potential developer. Council concur. CAG: 96-071, Fire Station Community Services Division submitted CAG-96-071, Fire Station #14 and #14 and Training Center, Training Center; and requested approval of the project, commencement of 60- John Daniels Construction day lien period, and release of retained amount of $124,259.29 to John Daniels Construction, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Development Service: Development,Services Division recommended acceptance of a dedication of Potter's Grassy Acre Short right-of-way on the southeast corner of the intersection of Shelton Ave. NE Plat ROW Dedication, and NE 19th Street to meet a requirement of the Potter's Grassy Acre Short Shelton Ave/NE 19th St Plat (SHP-97-158). Council concur. (SHP-97-158) CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,. NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: February 19, 1998 TO: Bob Edwards,President City Council Members FROM: Jesse Tanner,Mayor a-- STAFF CONTACT: Sue Carlson, Administrator Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Surplusing of City Property Issue In 1995 the City of Renton purchased approximately three acres of property in downtown Renton. The City purchased this property for the following public purposes: 1) for additional parking for downtown businesses, 2) to build a downtown plaza or town square, and 3) to provide property for a proposed downtown transit center. Because of the acquisition of other properties and the finalization of plans for the plaza and the transit center, the City determined that the parcel located between Logan Ave S. and Morris Ave S. would become surplus for planned public improvements, and will instead be sold to the private sector for development of market-rate housing. The purpose of this public hearing is to receive public input on the City's proposal to surplus this property. Background The City has been working on the redevelopment of downtown Renton for many years.In 1993 the City Council approved the Downtown Revitalization Plan which envisioned downtown residential, commercial entertainment, and retail uses. It outlined many of the elements that are going to be presented tonight including market rate residential housing;new,vibrant retail space; a town square or gathering place; and enhanced public amenities. As a first step in making that vision a reality,in 1995 the Council approved the creation of an Automall at Rainier and Grady and approved the purchase of downtown property vacated by the car dealerships when they relocated. This allowed the City to begin planning the public amenities, such as the piazza, additional parking and the transit center necessary to implement the downtown plan.An in-depth analysis of the proposed public improvements revealed that the property located between Logan Ave S. and - Morris Ave S. would not be needed for the planned public improvements. As a result of this analysis, an economic feasibility study was commissioned in early 1996 to determine the possibility of building market rate housing in the downtown,utilizing a portion of the recently purchased property. The study showed that this might be feasible if the City were committed to investing in the downtown by moving forward with plans for the town square or piazza. Both the Downtown Renton Association and a newly formed citizen's group, Citizen's for Piazza Renton(or CPR) embraced the concept of the piazza and began working to implement the concept. In February of 1997, the city issued a request for proposal seeking the participation of a private developer to build a mixed-use retail/residential project on this parcel. After publication and solicitation of proposals and interviews, Dally Homes was selected as the best potential developer for the site. Dally Homes' proposal includes 110 high-end apartments built over one level of structured parking and 4,600 square feet of retail space. In May, the City Council was briefed on this proposal and authorized the Administration to begin negotiations with Dally Homes on the sale of the property. r February 18, 1998 Page 2 Key Dates Downtown Development Project Logan/Morris Property Fall 1993 Downtown Plan approved by City Council Winter 1995 Automall Concept approved by City Council Spring 1995 City purchased property from Good Chevrolet Spring 1996 City commissioned economic feasibility study Summer 1996 Feasibility study complete; presentation to Council Fall 1996 Marketed property February 1997 Sent RFP's to interested parties March 1997 Received three responses from developers April 1997 Selection of developer May to December 1997 Negotiations February 1998 Public Hearing on Surplus of Property Recommendation The Administration recommends that the City Council declare the subject property surplus and requests approval to complete the sale of the property to Dally Homes. . I •< ,-:.: 1.•< , L • . 0 0 ••-•0 tx1 CrJ• 0 __,ti . 1-.• r -8'Cb 2 riq .% 0 , V V) • s V b r r s/ / A v . e 0 m 0 Li 0 . ,,,47411)AVVAIVPII.-.,,,, l•-• 0 • 4,:'/I447••iti4;',.iV:4;i64 .:',,gft,R6v.:,,gA.',:, R_) .1,--4,4,4..N.,,,,,.. . ,,,,4i, op ch .c-,4,.;-.411,,14.,.....--. w.,-,-.,Y.,,,, co -- --,.....,.,,ft-or V.* , ,0,36, 1---1 Ro . •,.44:Ait, - ] , r1 Al f..g.etv..:.,:,y,:s,10-0-,-rt-4,-.,,,, ;:1•11114—';:t*PV:?::avg:194:12$'1:1. GPrc010-q-o4, - • V) - 11 ":(g.lkregk.fo. .,o V) . CH— 00 : ftt < * if44,41,49E;,--$401..,:.4 V) r3irlyp-'1,,T,j;iq ..t-,--;,.4,:e#5!.*Nn'ircib. l--, , '''; -,,:i•Ze,,,f!,.,- 0 ' c+ ''..'iS°:4'ist,K4',4-,.'-::':' jP:'::)-1''41,1;;;-‘01,2'4V4:7:-.V.tr:f-k4a:Vr.i,t Y.:5gp.2,t,'-zi1R:.!I.;?,.4,*.,...:f.co,i; 4q ril ••;::Iv-P•-..,,,,..... ,A6,14.:6'1'f:;+40:1/4„31:e .1..,`,,,,..fr 0 S IA itlers Ave S z,.,„.,„,t,,,,.‘„,.,,,„,..,„,:•,..t•41,,,•.•Ne,-..r...1. S,44I4•24P.O.Ig'•:.•-4,1%Iffa."'14-Iti'IMI•,7,,a,"qii.'''`III• 4.41,0,1•411.kletiVI•4•„1,:-6'4 i'•,:e,'`IIA't• ,`",'"•0)-•,:.,.A.(4, .f•ViiIN')‘i•RN:4:V;IVOlz,46'.1. Cra ,,,:;,.:;. -...*,-,-.;*..:,...-;14-..,,..,„..., 4.--,..,.k„_,,,,,,„..,-,;,,,,,,,y,,,,,t,I.,,QA:,;.:,4',,,..,t, Logan Ave ,,m ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i•ae'I'-,I'I'ic•Ir, •:•$...`,Y4:/,'`d '4..:Vei4:$'1•1 '1'4,4k litiA-pg.t.tft-, F,,,:4 ',.'14 1.,-', As,,'1 S . i,`,.,i;i,,•,;:,.•;.,*1/4...0.71.,!;o,,,v.:.4.;.,x,4••'1.12;;;:!,i rrp.•,t'A.il:',''..'•.ifityi 0 • . if54!ole,,,,., .P.ofk,,,,,kii.e,14.iN:*-eq.. ,I•r'',.'i-,,t, $1.0P14',...,:f4,4\-e,f,IA.,,,z iz.1!...4.N I-1 • \ I-a Po ;:.,.,:r4,..,„„.4,,i,!„,,,i,,4 4.:.,'',Vi.411,1=',4:•... ,ik-'041;11r,g4ials0347“0.,,,4,1 1:„.4.,:i"..,-;("11,1110110.7:.P..iRiAii,t. '',:iii,.. ,....• I .01:1 ..1.,,,,i,.,:.,,A,,:y 4.,..?,,A,...,,,,v.z..,,,..r.,,...,4,,,,.4::cirk;;;;12. .,,,,•:`,0-,„,,z,., '''''''''•'l'••'i'4',1:4,‘',7:A..LN.F.-A.,',,,,,,,',..",,e'->tf.v...i4.4.,'‘ ;..),xi by,r.f.f.":7'''144.'e s;PP4,..'4'44:-,ilevi':i.,61',.1?,''k`.. ..'-Ii..•.•.",-‘•'I Cil`ti..-*:, [1/4,,.......:4',:k.,,t,',-^,IIiIt4;•10•.44',1" .P:I`'''''IA-.,:,'kl:I-'.I.'f tg• 41,1 '. • •'''''1•••'.. LII7e 4IrIel•X,2'4,, I;•,•,•!:,II!:1.I,I;Ir•',F,,I',..nr.,,•,'I,.,1,,/rI--.„. ..,'••44..t. ):4;,•;',.III*1,'...I.,'• •I,tpI'-,IWII,'..7,'„1.--'• /-1 0 13 M,;.:?,,:,,,'p ,,..,..','?1;,,,ei,5iYA,.,,,,,11..%.'r.,;.."' .. in. ..,71.i . ,..,,:),",- "V'T.,?,.:5), ,'I.'70.01111,;C;'.'-'^'.,,„-4 •;', ,,: .?..t,,c,-,:.,,,,;,.§.4,.,s-',A-;:,........4,... ..,.,-;:,,,,.,:,..,ps,,........:,.-.,,., .,„:1T. ,...:.:,,...,f4t.. ,3-,:;:.,i:+e,,,,:, ,..,r„.:.,,:7,„;•:...,„::"—:„..,,,:,.,,:.,..;-:.,?.,,,T,,, .,:.; f+,.....,..1 ,,,:::: ,:. --- Burnett Ave S ._. I • ._ i 1 • CI iT OWNED PROP-_ZTY • , Airport Way ' _ . , �_f� II [ a Tillicur� St S I¢I 1 . 4, S eq q _ I — SA Tobin Ave S "I Tobin Ave S a, > ¢ Tobin #1i 0 J a, (4 -\---\\. .._L , Cua Renton High School (4 a, 3Q, Q I 'Az'.I vi J E c 2nd St 3 / S 2nd St S 2nd St V) V) 1 W Cu ¢ CU I -J Q7/ . N d +' O a, t i / S 3rd St "' S 3rd St = S 3rd St q a, v> > ¢ v? Eo. S 3rd Pl v, d sec L73 �O t. iiii _ �,1.01 _ S 4th St IMI S 4th St 5. ME IM.:MI all I INIM MI:1-'1=11 II/ ,,,%. Fr] i gp N a, v > a L � _ (n Q N - — 3_ ¢ v kW. 41 •d u, iliA°19\ �� ti _ 3 3SB�,��fn0 a S5thSt _ S5thSt • cu f�/ L _____ a, L > O U 3 4 d Surplus Gti Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Parking ED/N/SP ` ,-",� * 0. Dennison --1 Transit 16 February 1998 rAr•-"q. plaza APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Date 2 -23 -7F/ FINANCE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT February 23, 1998 DECLARING CERTAIN CITY OWNED REAL PROPERTY AS SURPLUS (Referred February 9, 1998) The City of Renton purchased certain real property for various municipal purposes, that property generally being located east of Morris Ave S, south of S Second St, north of S Third St, and west of Logan Ave S. Because of the acquisition of other properties and the finalization of plans concerning other municipal developments in this area, portions.of the City lands are or may become surplus. The purpose of declaring this property surplus is to sell it to a developer,Daily Homes, Inc., for construction of a mixed-use retail and . housing complex. The legal description of this property is: Parcel A: Lots 6 and 7,Block 1, Smither's Sixth Addition to the Town of Renton,together with that portion of the alley adjacent to said Lot 6 vacated by City of Renton Ordinance No. 2779, which attached by operation of law. Parcel B: Lot 2 through 5, inclusive, Block 1,Motor Line Addition to Renton. The Finance Committee recommends the Council approve the resolutions declaring certain City owned property as surplus and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign such documents as necessary to transfer title thereto 1 Homes,Inc.or its assigns. King Par er, air /4Z-ek,a, , ( `Y\QL,e, Ka`hy Keol er-Wheeler,Vice Chair �_ _.- To i i Nelson,Member - cc: Jay Covington Sue Carlson February 23, 1998 Renton City Council Minutes Page 67 The City will use Standard and Poor's and Fitch as its rating agencies. Depending upon the credit rating and the market, we may purchase bond insurance for the bonds. Bond insurance guarantees a low interest rate on the bonds. The market conditions, rating, and insurance costs will be evaluated to make the final determination. The total costs recommended in the ordinance assume that insurance will be purchased. The Committee recommended first reading of the ordinance this evening to permit the pricing, and sale of the bonds. Next week, the Committee will again be briefed and make a recommendation on the final sale of the bonds. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. HR&RM: Healthcare Plan Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending • Changes concurrence in the staff recommendation to amend the City's healthcare program effective January 1, 1998, as follows: 1. Remove the pre-existing condition clause; 2. Remove the pre-authorization penalty affecting surgeon's fees; 3. Amend language from "calendar years" to "months" for benefits affecting mammograms, dental x-rays and drug and alcohol services; 4. Amend the mental and nervous benefit to meet the mandates of the 1998 Mental Health Parity Act; and 5. Add a benefit for medically necessary neurodevelopmental therapy treatment to restore and improve function for children six and under. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Clawson presented a report recommending SAD: East Kennydale concurrence in the staff recommendation that the City Council grant Interceptor preliminary approval for the East Kennydale Interceptor Special Assessment District (SAD). The Committee further recommended that Council direct Staff to proceed with the establishment of the final SAD upon completion of the East Kennydale Interceptor project. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution #3309 A resolution was read declaring property consisting of 1.2 acres located west EDNSP: Declaration of of Logan Ave. S., east of Morris Ave. S., and between South 2nd and 3rd DT-Area Surplus Property Streets to be surplus, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign such (Sale to Dally Homes Inc) documents as necessary to transfer title thereto to Dally Homes, Inc. or its SP-- 9 f'1. ' 55 assigns. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL I ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Resolution #3310 A resolution was read approving the Blueberry Lane final plat; 57 attached Plat: Blueberry Lane, townhomes on 9.17 acres in the vicinity of NE 6th St. and Duvall Ave. NE Final, NE 6th/Duvall Ave, (File No. FP-97-169). MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY FP-97-169 SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. :; 4. 4• TY:.,_ F 'RENTON;�CI N ONE«��':;� �°�::-: .n • "an HearingEx ariner• :Jesse Tanner,Mayor ' Fred J:Kaufman • January 20, 1998 Mr:Charlie Laboda Daily Homes,Inca 3316 Fuhrman Avenue,#100 Seattle,WA 98102 Re: RENTON 100 APARTMENTS FILE No. LUA97-155,SA-H Dear Mr.Laboda: The Examiner's Report and Decision on the above referenced matter,which was issued on December 18, 1997, and the reconsideration of the decision issued on January 5, 1998,were not appealed within the 14-day period established by'ordinance. Therefore,this matter is considered final by this office and the file on your application is being transmitted to the City Clerk as of this date. Please feel free to contact this office if further_assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK/mm cc: Peter Rosen Sandi Seeger,Development Services • 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 a5This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer y - •CIT:. :,:.:: y y Yt� { yam.. K • �:�Hearin �Ex 'rier> g Examiner .. Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman January 5; 1998 Ms. Jennifer Jorgenson " 205 S. Tobin Street Renton, WA 98055 Re: Request for Reconsideration/Clarification regarding • Daily Homes Renton 100 Apartments,File No.LUA97-155,SA-H : ' •. Dear Ms. Jorgenson: This office has reviewed your letter of January 2, 1998. As you noted,the applicant upon questioning by the Examiner indicated that auger casting will be used so that concerns about pile driving and its potential consequences will be avoided. A review of the Report and Decision will show that in the Minutes(a short summary of the questions, answers and testimony) at Page 4,Ms. Kittrick-noted that flooding has not been an historical issue at this site. Finding 19, at Page 6,noted that staff did not believe that development at this site would alter existing conditions in surrounding downtown areas. The already compacted nature of the existing soils means that any water reaching this site already drains off the site rather than being absorbed.::Problems will not be exacerbated. The proposed • landscaping should actually absorb some rainfall,potentially lessening runoff from the site. It did not appear that development at the subject site would affect properties in your area. Clearly, this does not mean that your area is exempt from existing problems. Those should definitely be brought to the attention of the appropriate officials. If this office can be of further assistance,please feel free to write: If this decision is not satisfactory, you may appeal this decision to the City Council,not`later than January 19, 1998, accompanied by the appropriate$75.00.fee. Sincerely, Fred J. Kau an S Hearing Examiner cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/BldgfPW Admin. Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Dir. • Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director • Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal . Parties of Record 200 Mill Avenue South-Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer it CITY OF RENTON January 2, 1998 JAN 0 21998 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 90855 Subject: Request for Reconsideration/Clarification Re: Report and Decision Daily Homes Renton 100 Apartments Project No. LUA-97-155,SA-H Dear Mr. Kaufman: I have read the above decision and wish to obtain clarification and possible reconsideration pertaining to mitigation measures for this project. I submitted a letter to Mr. Rosen dated December 8, 1997 (copy attached) which brought up issues about groundwater and the extremely high water table known to be in this area. I discussed my concerns with Mr. Rosen and even pointed out the booklet on Renton's history in the Renton Museum specifically states the building height restrictions were put in place in this location specifically because of this high water table. My letter asked about the downstream/upstream hydrology (presumably to the north of the project site) and what possible ramifications might come from the large quantity of piles to be put in place for a suitable building foundation for this project and the subsequent water displacement. I also asked about possible damage to our buildings in the event piles were to be driven for this project. I can find no mention in your decision of either 1) my concerns, or, 2) possible solutions, to address my fears. I did however read in your decision where the piles will be auger cast, so that noise wouldn't pose a problem, which was another item of concern I had discussed with Mr. Rosen. Thank you for your attention to these matters. Sincerely, O „1„,_yo-1,112,e7- Jennifer Jorgenson 205 S. Tobin Street Renton,WA 98055 enclosure CITY OF RENTON January 2, 1998 JAN 0 21998 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 90855 Subject: Request for Reconsideration/Clarification Re: Report and Decision Daily Homes Renton 100 Apartments Project No. LUA-97-155,SA-H Dear Mr. Kaufman: I have read the above decision and wish to obtain clarification and possible reconsideration pertaining to mitigation measures for this project. I submitted a letter to Mr. Rosen dated December 8, 1997 (copy attached) which brought up issues about groundwater and the extremely high water table known to be in this area. I discussed my concerns with Mr. Rosen and even pointed out the booklet on Renton's history in the Renton Museum specifically states the building height restrictions were put in place in this location specifically because of this high water table. My letter asked about the downstream/upstream hydrology (presumably to the north of the project site) and what possible ramifications might come from the large quantity of piles to be put in place for a suitable building foundation for this project and the subsequent water displacement. I also asked about possible damage to our buildings in the event piles were to be driven for this project. I can find no mention in your decision of either 1) my concerns, or, 2) possible solutions, to address my fears. I did however read in your decision where the piles will be auger cast, so that noise wouldn't pose a problem, which was another item of concern I had discussed with Mr. Rosen. Thank you for your attention to these matters. Sincerely, c2e7-17771ydf e Jennifer Jorgenson 205 S. Tobin Street Renton, WA 98055 enclosure DEC - g /997 December 8, 1997 CITY alp CITY nr o ',-.- Peter Rosen, Project Manager • City of Renton P/B/PW DEC 0 8 1997 Development Services Division 200 Mill Avenue SouthECEVED Renton, WA 98055 Re: Renton 100 Apartments Project No. LUA-97-155,SA-H-ECF Dear Mr. Rosen: • Unfortunately, I will be unable to attend the Public Hearing scheduled for December 9th. I would however like to present the following for your consideration (and possible help) during the hearing process. My neighbors and I are concerned about the high groundwater situation in the neighborhood. The recent upgrade to the storm water system has helped tremendously in controlling localized flooding. But, during prolonged storm events the water table rises to the point where our basements begin to wick up water from below ground. I am aware that the developer has discovered the high water table on this project. (He mentioned it as a possible detractor during his presentation to the Committee of the Whole, held I believe at the end of August.) I'd like to know if a recent hydrology study has been performed which depicts the possible effect (and mitigation measures) for downstream properties for the water which will be displaced due to the large number of pilings/footings which will be necessary to support this project. In the event we experience increased water in our basements, will we have any recourse for protection? Also, what methods will be used for piling/pier installation? Will we be subjected to intense pounding, similar to what we experienced during the I-405 construction? If so, will arrangements be made to record what damages might`arise to our surrounding properties because of it? What about possible repairs which • may become necessary? A fmal side note of interest for consideration is the main access point for the facility. If I read the paperwork properly, they are intending to use the Seattle Pipeline right-of-way as the main point of ingress/egress. What will happen if Seattle "reclaims" this right-of-way and blocks it off to outside users? Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Jennifer Jorgenson , 205 S. Tobin Street Renton, WA 98055 1 11 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON the The Environmental Review Committee (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- Significance Mitigated for the following SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 RENTON 100APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA,ECF Environmental review fora four story a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal mixed use building in downtown Renton. newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months Location:255 Logan Avenue So. prior to the date ofpublication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language The 15 oje comment con appeal perihe gfor this project will run concurrently. The continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County comment/appeal periods for this project will Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the end at 5:00 PM on December 1, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to State of Washington for King County. the Development Services Division Land The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County Use Review Supervisor. Information on the Journal not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers project dfiie and the mitigation measureso (andPP 9 Y imposed by the City of Renton's during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton 100 Apartments Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235- 2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor,Municipal as published on: 11/17/97 Building. A Publig c Hearing will be held by the The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$56.15 Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular in the Council Chambers on the Legal Number 3894 second meetin floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on December 9, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the nrnnnsed site plan approval. plan approval. If then Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will , be heard as part of this public hearing. egal Clerk,' outh County Journal Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Published in the south County Journal Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of tic3Y. , 19�'� November 17, 1997.3894 0“11 r r r r i lr—r-.. -\^yam Cam/ 6 0 i ��,`` ZssioN ,aFye�,,, `,�:o� 4.% v; Notary Public of the State of Washington Y;�' OTARy �' H- residing in Renton _�_ = King County, Washington •••e) AUBLAC' p:•• N?QlFC ? 6 2p�;�0 .. • • • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••---•• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••-•-•-•••• CURRENT PLANNING DiVISION • , AFFIDAVIT OF SERVIMAILING • • On the 2) .. day of raeceWAber , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United . States, a sealed envelope containing k1/4"-v1110 el-tUivt‘Imr 'Reio czi;-1 • documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • • • Ck\bv-ite. L2Azoaft 1:710-11A.i liom•e-s 1. • gekitirkAi co.r...K.Lev•A • lwr3ersSov\ • • • • • • • • • • (Signature of Sender) Sit..1046-It • Sre-r-sirr- ' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS. COUNTY OF KING ) • • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that e• -•,=)rube& 41": signed this • ' instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for Me uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 1k9d2.0_, . • Notary Public and fortte-State of W ington • • Notary (Print) • My appointment eThIVAIeff4 4(AMeHEFF , . COLIMIEISION EXPIRES 6/29/S9 • _project Name:: - • " -‘10VN too Pr ies • , _ , • • prbiedi NuMber:\ ' NOTARY.DOC • • ;• AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES ,being first duly sworn,upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 18th day of December ,1997, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: ('///" l ( v 7' l SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before r me this I Ali day of 494"44}1; 1997. Notary Public ' and for the State of Washington, residing at ,therein. Application, Petition, or Case No.: Renton 100 Apartments LUA97-155, SA-H The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT December 18, 1997 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Daily Homes Renton 100 Apartments File No.: LUA-97-155,SA-H LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To construct four-story mixed use building containing ground floor commercial space with parking garage,and 110 multi- family residential units on upper floors. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on December 2, 1997. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the December 9, 1997 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,December 9, 1997, at 9:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Site vicinity map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan Exhibit No. 5: Landscape plan-roof plaza Exhibit No.6: Landscape plan-roof plaza Exhibit No.7: Building elevations, SW,E, SE Exhibit No.8: Building elevations,N Exhibit No. 9: Data sheet for floor plan Exhibit No. 10: Schematic illustration Daily Homes Renton 100 Apartments File No.: LUA-97-155,SA-H December 18, 1997 Page 2 Exhibit No. 11: Aerial illustration Exhibit No. 12: Second level floor plan The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by PETER ROSEN,Project Manager,Development Services, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant requests site approval for a proposed four-story mixed use building in downtown Renton. The subject site is 53,962 square feet and encompasses almost a city block between Logan Avenue South,Morris Avenue South, South 2nd and South 3rd Streets. The ground level floor has approximately 4,610 square feet of retail development which would be oriented towards Logan Avenue. It will be divided into individual leasable spaces with entrances from Logan. The remainder of the ground floor consists of a 145-stall parking garage for the apartment residents only. The principal access into the parking garage is off the Seattle pipeline right-of-way which is accessed off both Logan and Morris. There is also a secondary access from the alley on the northwest corner of the building. The 110 multi-family units proposed would be on the upper three levels which are broken into three buildings wings. These units would comprise approximately 93,398 square feet. The average building height at the parapets is approximately 50 feet. The highest point on the southeast elevation is the entrance lobby elevator feature at 61 feet. The three building wings of the apartments are broken up by two landscaped plazas on the second level. The landscaped courts are approximately 14,500 square feet consisting of a series of terraced planter beds. There is seating,tile paving and walkways through it. The proposal is a major component in the downtown redevelopment. The overall objective of the revitalization is to create an urban center in downtown Renton and provide for a mix of residential,office,commercial,civic spaces and entertainment opportunities. The bus transit hub located across the street on Logan is a joint venture with the City,King County and Metro and construction is scheduled for 1999. In addition there are improvements planned along Logan Avenue,primarily to make it more of a pedestrian friendly street. The proposal is to widen the sidewalk to 12 feet on the west side of Logan and 16 feet on the east side. There would also be street trees,furnishings, lighting and on-street parking. Construction for that is scheduled for 1998. In addition there is the Renton Piazza located diagonally across from this project,which is envisioned as a central gathering space for downtown activities and events. Across the street from that is a small parcel referred to as the gateway area which is being designed in conjunction with the piazza. On the south side of this proposal is the Seattle pipeline right-of-way which is going to be improved with 50 parking spaces that will serve. downtown and would also be overflow guest parking for this project. The former Sound Mazda garage across the street from this project is a City-owned building and the City is looking at several different scenarios including small retail shops,farmer's market,community building. That provides basically the context of this project in terms of the redevelopment efforts. The proposal went to the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on November 12, 1997. The ERC issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M). The mitigation measures included fire,traffic and parks mitigation fees. Further mitigations concerned a construction plan which would limit hauling hours to 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m.unless otherwise approved,and to maintain temporary erosion control for the duration of the project. A concern was raised by a citizen regarding the noise generated from pile driving on the project. The foundation will be constructed with auger cast pilings which would be drilling rather than driving piles; therefore the impacts of the noise should be significantly less. Construction hours are limited from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.,Monday through Saturday. This site is located in the Center Downtown(CD)Comprehensive Plan(CP)designation. Generally the intent of the designation is to create a balance of land uses which contribute to the revitalization of downtown Renton Daily Homes Renton 100 Apartments File No.: LUA-97-155,SA-H December 18, 1997 Page 3 and to reinforce downtown Renton as a regional commercial district in the City. The CP recognizes trying to make downtown Renton more of an urban center in the county and strongly encourages a mix of uses. The proposal is consistent with all of the downtown element policies. The net density of the proposal is 88.8 dwelling units per acre and that meets CP policies which encourages a high level of intensity. The proposal is consistent with all of the policies for the Center Downtown designation. In terms of conformance with existing land use regulations,the subject site is located in the Center Downtown zoning designation. The purpose is to provide a mixed use commercial center serving as a regional market and to encourage a variety of retail, sales,personal-professional services, and multi-family residential dwellings. Multi-family residential units are a primary permitted use with density ranging from 25 to 100 dwelling units per net acre. In terms of the development standards,this site was added into the downtown core area designation by the City Council on August 21, 1997. The intent of the downtown core area is to have very flexible development standards to encourage a high density urban intensity development. Normally projects in the CD require a 10 foot street setback; in the core area there is no setback requirement and the intent of that is to bring uses right up to the sidewalk to encourage a mix of activities. Within the downtown core area projects are exempt from most of the development standards of the CD zone including parking requirements, lot coverage and landscape requirements. The CD zone allows a maximum building height of 95 feet and this project has a proposed high point of 61 feet. The highest building elevation would be 103 feet 8 inches above sea level which meets the airport zoning horizontal height limit of 179 feet above sea level. With the planned introduction of high density residential zoning into downtown,the potential conflicts between residential uses and commercial uses and the airport was considered in the environmental analysis. This project probably will be affected by its proximity to the transit hub and to bus noise as much as to any airport noise. The applicant is proposing a series of planter beds along the south and west building facades to provide some screening from the ground level garage. There are proposed decorative columns with trellises to provide some screening from the parking garage and also soften the building facade. There are no parking requirements in the downtown core area. The parking was analyzed in terms of the environmental impact and offsite impacts with the ERC. It was thought that based on the available parking in downtown and what is being provided that there would be no adverse impact on surrounding properties and that there would be adequate parking provided. The downtown area is comprised of mostly commercial uses at this point. The proposed residential project does not anticipate adversely affecting the use of any of the surrounding properties. To the north of the Seattle pipeline right-of-way there is an 18 foot piece of property owned by Big 5. There are negotiations currently under way to acquire this parcel. The subject site is presently vacant, largely covered with impervious surfaces. The construction of the building covering approximately 90 percent of the site area would essentially replace existing impervious surfaces with buildings. There are planned upgrades of utilities and storm water facilities that would further mitigate any impacts associated with development of the site. The mixed use development is expected to increase property values in downtown. Adding a residential population would improve the customer base for commercial businesses. There are presently negotiations to finalize a franchise agreement with the Seattle Water Department concerning the right-of-way. The area proposed for the parking is just one of the elements of the franchise agreement. If for some reason the agreement is not secured,the configuration of the parking garage would allow for access to change to Morris Avenue or to the alley. The secondary garage entry proposed off the alley would be used principally for garbage collection for the residential units as well as for Daily Homes Renton 100 Apartments File No.: LUA-97-155,SA-H December 18, 1997 Page 4 moving. The alley is 8 feet wide at this point. There is a pedestrian street level entry at the southeast corner of the building. There is a trash loading area at the northwest corner of the building for residents, and a trash enclosure area at the northeast corner of the building for commercial uses. The upper three residential levels are broken into building wings that are basically focused around landscaped courts. This would allow light and air exposure to reach most of the apartment units and it does have a south orientation that would enhance exposure to sunlight. There are adequate public services and facilities available to accommodate the proposed development. The proposal would redevelop and improve an existing vacant site in downtown Renton. The investment in the area and the added presence of a residential population would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. Staff recommends approval of the Renton 100 Apartments with the condition that it comply with the ERC mitigation measures. Charlie Laboda, Daily Homes,3316 Fuhrman Avenue East, Suite 100, Seattle,Washington 98102, applicant herein,responded regarding the auger cast pilings. He stated that these piles are drilled,not driven, and the noise associated with the drilling machine is consistent with large machinery that is typical to construction so there should be no greater noise impact. As to the noise associated with the airport,he stated that by notifying the residents of the closeness to the airport it will alleviate a lot of the complaints. The people who are going to be living here are going to be living in an urban setting and will know that the airport is close by and that they can expect some airport noise. Regarding the security of the building, it is the intent to have a completely secured building. All garage doors will need openers to get in. The main entry to the project will have security access where the resident will have to use a key or a code to get in and their guests will be buzzed in. There will be no open access to the public. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services Division,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,Washington 98055,addressed the issue of flooding and stated that it has not been an historical problem here. The City is currently substandard in the water lines that are around here but a City project to upgrade all the water lines around it and bring new fire hydrants in will go into construction before this project gets started. She further clarified that the standard construction hours for building is from 7:00 a.m.to 10:00 p.m. However, the pile driving or auguring comes under the mining and grading ordinance and that is 7:00 a.m.to 8:00 p.m. Sue Carlson,Administrator,Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning,City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,Washington 98055, stated that the 18 foot purchase from Big 5 is not actually a part of the development. It will be owned by the City of Renton and will be part of a proposed parking and trail system included in the downtown plan that was passed by the City Council in 1993. Big 5 has been contacted and negotiations are currently under way. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 10:07 a.m. Daily Homes Renton 100 Apartments File No.: LUA-97-155,SA-H December 18, 1997 Page 5 FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS &DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,Daily Homes,Inc., filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for a 110-unit apartment complex and commercial space and associated parking. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located 255 Logan Avenue S. The subject site is located in the center of downtown Renton. The site is bounded by Logan on the east and Morris on the west. The site is centrally located on the block bounded by South 2nd on the north and South 3rd on the south. An alley is located north of the site. 7. Renton High School is located northwest of the site and the Metro Transit Center is located immediately east of the site between Burnett Avenue S and Logan. The proposed Renton Piazza project will be located just southeast of the site. The Seattle Cedar River Pipeline is located south of the subject site and its diagonal alignment defines the diagonal south property line of the subject site. The right-of-way is owned by Seattle. An eighteen(18)foot remainder parcel is located immediately south of the subject site and separates the site from the pipeline right-of-way. 8. The subject site is a level parcel approximately 53,962 square feet in area. The parcel is generally trapezoidal in shape. As noted, its south property line is a diagonal generally following the pipeline corridor but has an 18 foot indent created by the remainder parcel noted above. The south property line is approximately 350 feet long. The Logan frontage is approximately 220.59 feet long. The Morris frontage is 103.01 feet long. The north property line is somewhat irregular but is approximately 350 feet long. 9. The subject site was part of the original incorporation of the City and occurred in 1901. 10. The subject site is zoned Center Downtown(CD). This designation permits mixed use development including commercial uses and residential uses in the same building. 11. The applicant proposes developing a mixed use building which contains a first floor parking structure for 145 vehicles, approximately 4,610 square feet of commercial space located along Logan Avenue, and three stories of residential dwellings above the first floor parking and commercial space. 12. The residential complex will be designed as three building wings projecting off a main building constructed along the north property line. The three wings will extend to the south from the building's Daily Homes Renton 100 Apartments File No.: LUA-97-155,SA-H December 18, 1997 Page 6 common north component. The wings will be divided by open courts constructed on the second level just above the parking garage. 13. The building will be four-stories tall. The building will have a peaked and gabled roofline with an average height of approximately 50 feet. The main entrance of the complex will be located in a tower structure that will be approximately 61 feet above grade. 14. Even without the extreme modulations created by the open court areas,the building facade will modulate to accommodate bay walls and terraces. 15. The grade level garage's facade will have columns and small planter areas to soften its appearance. The main access to the garage will be via an access roadway through a parking lot that will be created over the Seattle pipeline. A secondary access driveway, limited to emergency access,will be located off the alley near Morris. If the alley access proposal is too constrained,the applicant has an alternate plan to move the access to Morris. 16. As noted, ground level parking will be developed over the Seattle pipeline. The City of Renton is negotiating for perpetual rights to use surface over the pipeline for parking in this location and for access to the subject site. Fifty parking spaces would be created in this area. Parking will be general open parking but can serve as overflow and guest parking for the complex. Renton is similarly negotiating to allow the development of the Piazza southeast of the subject site. 17. While the site is exempt from normal parking requirement since it is located in the downtown core,the site will be providing approximately 1.31 parking stalls per unit in the garage. 18. The applicant's proposal includes the two unique landscaped courts on the second level or roof of the parking garage. These areas will only be accessible to residents and their guests. These areas will total approximately 14,500 square feet. They will consist of terraced landscape planters, seating and walkways. 19. Staff does not believe the development of this site will exacerbate drainage problems suffered in other areas of the City surrounding this site. The compacted soils on the site do not readily percolate. 20. The project is anticipated to generate approximately 532 average daily vehicle trips. 21. The development will be subjected to the noises associated with the operation of the transit center located east of the site along Logan. The Airport Director noted that the site is just east of the extended centerline of the Renton Municipal Airport and that a majority of aircraft turn east in the near vicinity of the subject site. The Director wants to make sure residents are informed of the potential for noise from airport operations to minimize complaints and surprise. The transit base location will be obvious to potential residents. 22. The applicant proposes using auger cast methods to secure the foundation footings for the new structure rather than pile driving due to the sensitive nature of the older dwellings in the area. 23. Floor area ratio average is approximately 2:1 whereas the proposal provides a floor area ratio of approximately 4.2:1 24. The City will be updating the water service in the area. Staff reports that the storm sewer and sanitary systems are adequate to serve the site. Daily Homes - Renton 100 Apartments File No.: LUA-97-155,SA-H December 18, 1997 Page 7 CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed use satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2. The proposed mixed residential and commercial development is compatible with many of the Comprehensive Plan's goals for downtown redevelopment. It has ground level commercial uses which will cater to downtown shoppers, and most of all it has a modern residential complex in the heart of the downtown area. It epitomizes urban development and caters to those who choose to live in the center of activity. The site is conveniently located to transit which is directly across the street and shopping opportunities abound between the downtown core and the Rainier corridor. The library is a few blocks from the site. In addition to the Piazza proposal,there is the Cedar River Trail,Liberty Park and the Community Recreational facility within walking distance of the subject site. 3. With the newly adopted code changes expanding the downtown core area and modifying building setback standards,the proposal meets the standards of the Zoning Code. Building Code and Fire Code compliance will be determined with the submission of a building permit. 4. There will be the normal unavoidable impacts associated with the actual construction. The applicant has chosen the less intrusive auger cast method for construction avoiding the potential for excessive noise and possible damage pile driving might bring. The new complex will generate the general noises associated with an urban residential environment. The taller building will increase the shadow impacts in some surrounding properties but these impacts are expected from urban scale development. 5. The facade and roof treatment will break up the appearance of bulk that could otherwise be created by a new larger building. There will be terraces and articulations along most of the exterior walls. In addition,the deeply incised upper courts will also alter the impact of scale on surrounding uses and the streetscape. 6. While the building will be utilizing most of its lot,the juxtaposition of the pipeline right-of-way and the widened Logan street and sidewalk will offset the mass of the building. As noted the courts will Daily Homes Renton 100 Apartments File No.:LUA-97-155,SA-H December 18, 1997 Page 8 also offset this apparent mass. There will be an approximately six foot setback along Morris which is a narrower street and there will be some setback along the north property line adjacent to the alley and northern uses. 7. The proposal is located in the central core which is exempt from setbacks and landscaping requirement as well as required parking. It is providing more aesthetic treatment including the courts,facade and tower features than is ordinarily required. In addition, it will be offering parking not required to help keep street parking available for guests and shoppers frequenting the downtown. 8. The internal courts will provide immediate passive recreational opportunities for residents and their guests as well as reduce the scale of the facade along its south and longest facade. The secured nature of the building and its parking and access will also enhance the safety of the site. 9. The open courts and surrounding development on the south and east will create a feeling of openness. Currently,the northern tier of units will enjoy views to the north. Potential development could block that openness ultimately. 10. The biggest impacts are expected to be the noise of the nearby airport,and noise and comings and goings associated with the transit station. Again,this is an urban environment and it is anticipated that residents will expect a certain level of urban bustle. 11. The redevelopment of the site will definitely enhance property values and will hopefully encourage like development in the surrounding community. 12. The proposed access seems appropriate as long as the pipeline access is secured. The secondary access appears reasonable although the limited alley width in this location will definitely limit access to secondary access. 13. There are or will be adequate utilities to serve the site. DECISION: The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the ERC's mitigations measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The applicant shall provide assurances that all future residents are aware of the location of the transit base and airport and their potential for noise. ORDERED THIS 18th day of December, 1997. FRED J. KAUF HEARING EXAMINER Daily Homes Renton 100 Apartments File No.: LUA-97-155,SA-H December 18, 1997 Page 9 TRANSMITTED THIS 18th day of December, 1997 to the parties of record: Peter Rosen Charlie Laboda Kayren Kittrick 200 Mill Avenue S 3316 Fuhrman Avenue,#100 200 Mill Avenue S Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98102 Renton,WA 98055 Sue Carlson Beverly Blackwell Jennifer Jorgenson 200 Mill Avenue S 215 Whitworth Avenue S 205 S.Tobin Street Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 18th day of December, 1997 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Administrator Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,January 2, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. Daily Homes Renton 100 Apartments File No.: LUA-97-155,SA-H December 18, 1997 Page 10 The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. RENTON HIGH SCHOOL KO�; OM 0 >s nos ■� aura 0 ��r 400 1r• a NM MI • �: ••-■W1 , S 5 �.. !'� . :■ - � um.or MI .� : . _... . rcl —I gi With; tied& pr,g iSgT. !T n :'_' S2-5.,.'... gamMMemtrP.-: arz- `, 'imp s4,u i 34, .� 1 ,p', MO 1MPa4.0,f i EMegli INMat „ _s rz21 1-_..__ ` . �� ;• sz_ „. ' / ) - ---, Ti. i- •4___, • r --, .„ , /// N , 1 ' "•-.',',..',, 4 ‘ 14..,"-",,,, .. . :':s,..'.';:::,.::.z....\•;1:..:... s,..i...,1, , , \l: )('k :1';', k. .4'..-V-.• \'. ••,\,‘,,,, ..,•:. " ,, \TN,.... •rs, \is / 'IZ%--"_,\ ' ,7.,P,-2C i& ‘ • • • • i \ - • - ,4:,*„•••\ / i/ .S.‘,'i - - / \ 'T•/ q• ' i / •\ \ \' ' \ ;IP\‘.' ' .2-*C4` ''\\ •' „ \ — .> -4' .• \ ,--T„-:•' // / \ i ., -—'' ` *,‘ 'I ,,,/-- •- .. . •..•,V;L '\ ., // i 1 ' 4 F"- v_u, ,-7,4,3,,•\,, '41.,1 • \ /I , c •• -1-,• ', , 0 ll"\ - ki‘ r, , tt ••41 '4, 1,, •,,,b‘ \\f —___ _\' s.,,,,t',.. -,i . a; \ • N,/ ,y/a •A , :,-”-!..,.,.' .,I),,,.,g7,4,, ;Iv 6 ,-,•,. .,•*.,1 , -, ks1 .' -lc lirik,_-•:$1y.149w',.... ....7?/-zs.t -\ _ ,..e..),,i ,-, • __IT-‘,' t.. ..V/V, 4\‘'148are_ i\i'\\ \A',c. ,,c-'•.' '6-, .._.-=•.,,. .... p..,t t, „,til / CA:t.4.'41/44'.4 , ,\ ,, - ,-4. C.. Jc? / • i r' ,4! 4 .4\Vil/4 ...\\Q-47-71... 1,." .1.2, \• ...- A --. 0e., . / ,,C1,/ \41,+,..ff/ ,,,,,' ,-,„:1:,‘..;.‘V, ••:L,7\ 4 -...;, .4#,? .V7' , , • , Nt',, '.., \ip._ .k.-,',.1 ------'• l'i,..:* 0 • I ' • i ,,,•,,,, •ort, , ‘...1, ,,,,,„'&•,?,.,•,• ..4--, ',,N1'."-• ..•1 -'' ' ZAL I 7, ' ' ..:444 , ,,,,,, ,:s4,.c. tok, ":'" • t ,—, \-__I _, 1 ' ,,,.,-,/ ...1‘ 4,q; \''.z•.. -,.•;, . • ' 'it"' -• --.. - ', ': 1,0.-, :, a4)I' . ".,.-....-„-.1\t‘.. -.‘,--',-,„?., ,..i ;I ' ' „.;-c• ''''';‘'1,4,t, _%; , \\ '1 t'_ Vify. •it,. 't• '),:-,•„:''` ,:,..:':'..• AV/ c'l pm..:P„, /le . \.. ••„,\,,,--,:-:, / ,4,,I,g•t- •• , ,,,..,,,,„ ,,.: 47/ \ •.,..• ;pc.„,...!,., _, , c. /.4fA, ' k\i •c- ?....-' ''•II Alit- 'ks\-:`',-.5 --1".17 i-of c. . g4=141::=.1-"::::::',,t.;-', . / \,',1,: i \ ‘ \f‘zs.'" '''it< i%1 gill ''•'`-'••••• '* gi 4 i 1,1:-",e- tr:.:?-:‘,Y.'!'" '4‘'.1 c:6-`, --AltO, rkii 0\ 1, `1,• -.- ,\.,., 1 •r:''''''‘Villy, -7 4.:. ,,,„: , , ,..6 ,,._,.......t...„.4., ,,c. t.:. , ., \ „1„..v.,•,,,,_ ik....,,,q„,, , : III 4. ,,,s,.......,. ..,. \ ,s1 ,.1•3 I .• .1.,,,'N'1.^.,--r 4 s.•':f.Z.,- s, " \ -'`.1 i-i •- s: IVNIA' ill "...„tr,f1 .1-3!' 'f.-1>k 't..c....,.,,, :.1' ''',1„::‘, . • .,.,' 4,_ A.,,c, i ,'• '• ilb(i A.!/..-If f , . .-... -, , . :4-;?,,,.- ;.1 ,'- • , 7 '',T.-*X.-,.,..,,,'',,,-'-......7-'`.—:7''fi.-----k.-•'1-.--,-;,3--4-,..444-,..4,."*:,r;...s 3r.2 „N.'.:r*,-•.,-4,,A4N',-te.'7-t-.r.,,4.‘:..iN.t-•.,t\\,,4,r-\'/.',,‘‘i,\/,\/1'\\,c„A.„-'1I.,V....„.s.:—‘.-.-`,..-.•-.-.'-,\.':,'--,',,,-,i,,,,'•.,.:t.„",..4i:Nz14 i'\,',','."4•• i,.,,,.2--,..,,',...,"‘s1„''..‘Y,t P.t.:i-*::ll,.',/,I.,.,.-,.y4'. 7,•1----,11,-1,1'--. ,.e.•.,.'.,"L's-'-'f,.''0e,.4,','' -,•.„,-,A,,.'..-,fI,'.x,-"',,:"P.''/''..4 -,4 '. \/\A1 ii / = // \ - i . c0 v ; \ r , \ , _ Z a r 1: , 0/ v 0 1 i/i ..1 ‘,..,,,,:-.„,_:_. co• ' `i4;, i,;(. 1 i-7 1' i 11J ill 1,„ - 1.1 ., - A, - , \,.. . ,...., vit I -24-:1 .' • / ‘.....v,,-4:', .. -4?-f• if ,i,/ ,.., .1,,,Npl....4,,,a. .s. \ ,: ,..,A, •,„, •- . ). tr,,,, --... . .. -•i .. .,,-..,,,„ ..,„ v ,:..,, . -, -it :-.,•;,.., . .c• . • .4,.., , .s., r-,,, a ,-„6,-,.;\ , • 1,----__--- . 1 Liao_6%,' .'' ,,E;,,,„. \ 4.i ,.,:,• . .c. v.t.. ,s . _ ty g/4V.: ..' :-... 4.--.;-'i ' IV;;?,' 09 \\( \\i113;-.'_''''.'2, . 0.•• ,i - y 0, >J J< ) , ,ft_ii,...• ‘,., a Ar--.. tr, 1 _,,,e,,„;,,) -7. \ -• .1-N.,. . . .i,•-••- •if-,, ,i ,,,T.,- •• •z_'. el 1 itz, .r.e_AN,, - - ,\ IA • /1•?' a \ 7\-- .:-•-.1 f - '',\ v ..,,IJ• LLI 0 . cr. • -"%;: , I•il e,--,a., te:,, • ,y...4,., , 1,,, -pi, • 1.. , ld. \''s /.''•:,' i i. <Z • \%_ — •J'er--.:" A ,. \ /11 N\ \ 0 \/ ta• N 'V •..7 , - - AvilaL r„ ,_.., • 1 ,,, , , "A-, , , \/\t' . •,•.---- "• —4 ---"---: ",-,T• 1 i 244 l'/'''('' ) \.'. ,,. i Y NV , ; I---- - --.:.',/•.'. ' '-•':,, Afk,,,, '.33:-41, ' '''^,0.:,i' 1)50'10' i i _ ..-... • '...--..r. =V"- '.7',-3:" V "fiii," ''.00;gi•V r.i,".;,-„,;:--.'i 4 1.* ' - : • t .----e A , (b - r-e..„ r--..„4,, .. %., 4 ak „lc ,.. , • —';3'",•..i f•-• e .....r •,, . •••. ,,,e,„v , ,,, //-7 -:„./ .,. etr#714, ,i ,..„_,c.• -,:. -,., al. a „ \ '.,. 1 , - .11,, ;`) . .,-;`.. "; ..- ",tt:46..1?: 4,,,•, './ 1 p":.,_.:,./- '',. :,• 21....•;.e.-1-,.•.-.41 i. . / . .-- ‘ .,2.....4 4, t` A';;.• 1. V, ' •V/ ' .1! ee N8915�'E TU33' ? m� mm Na9'67a'E 64.01' Y m 9 fa iffi 1 1 1 (�} 589Tab'40 E UNIT ; UNIT A2r NIT A2 • B IT Al UN.,.. ..,..11„,.. I 4 fir it 1 IT IT Al r B2 ®UN 111 I■.11IV■: I�'�` Id** II '��l `■Jlti' I 11.111 ;;/AA.� 2�E. 1 •�:��,! UNIT AP UNIT A2 UNIT UNIT bi - •1 ;:,r ... I� .I .}y�ill.a}• ;lip " III r_.,,,_ ELEV . 1 .rr,i. .i I �;>C�� §tOr (m mow f IIt P 4 lot < P� e..Aal! Lipicii-p.a. P i Lea --''I I I I 4 UN A2r • UN lij • r--�� __m_LOW %i w 'AI. - UNIT •Li = i ' UNIT B ll 11% I�7 ■� /aaiicp*, v �,1. 1 T,� -1 acz)b, rl MI UNITD - �I '� UNIT Br ' " PLAZA 2 '� ..... I- y r•, l_ ■ ' �� • Lti .. [lir ❑ .19CI��I�� ///� /`� i� /UNIT Br UNIT B ir-1 - �r� C� a/llll T A2r .. Mrse � r` �` AStifPLAZA 1 _ �,�:�-� rwit. �...1.� ., UNIT Br ;, ,,, IA z43/S• �° --, --...... ,,,,,,,•_„,,___ ,„_,,,,„ /ter 11//yl/lll//` _ - ,. #,, • / ier*4.------Al / 44.,,,i, 1111;./-1. W. 3 Ica •�• A e, ,- NIT C2 0 1!*114, /... . f•--, -41bk \ ALF , 7 , 4rftk; 4,4. ‘,---4ti& IIIID PLAZA / LEVEL R-1 PLAN a �� SCALE: 1/I6' = I'-0' f'I 0 z • W ‘. I. mmm 0 8 16 32 4 \ . ... \ Mr 58, 3p r05J1 — — // E)0•TNO DOYYEACIAL I I .- 1011ENA j/ j I ,a..�_ — — ALLEY Ent ///////// / I SECONDARY ` jj,, •"�'�'•� L+IIfi A �� WAAGE rco., I ►�'q ,1 NI �W ofEI F I'1 ' `y�H ,t>�vkp-IWh'i' I.) —i .,11tO'`.lraer— 1�i1' I truf 4. 14.c 11i`4•Ii.�gl.". 649 if ,v_t'..,D••q{E4»I tif-Oh 11.41/40/ ---=:e/rr•t111.fLa(y✓grr•"' ._.. I I i t �. L-- —I'.I I,f PROPOSED MIXED USE BUILDING _ 1 uMeAr&'nruc (nalhlr. 4,6 3 II Q "" DEVELOPMENT BY DALLY HOMES , ��„A y „to x ONSIOE DUSJECi PROPERTY 11M0 • ,WN REUS. _`• ..1, [NiR7 I A(Aj na elc INV gel 97'l d A •� I'AYA.I YY1Od W l I 4017 �•n— ILrs1•Y 77 t t O d ‘ , At---/-777...7.... .. ,,,,,..0„k_44% ,. A7;7 Ai. ou I 143,7 r li / / p� C / / . / `_ d,SA I .7//'-, / i r I : /% / i Irc • • I • /i .' /// / • tAtlO5CArr,44"6 Y'di I / / :Dialog RETAIL/ lar Es.• • n ...... /,/,; ---L7- _ .,... &/' ./ / • —I—N.1r.al4.ya —..�,• I dirtMN MP PROPOSAL R Of?RITE DEVELOPUENE ""MR • REerONSleIUTY Of CITY Of WITCO tOUIdDE eJeECr PROPERTY UNE3 7•_i 1••.Ie.R MIw ArM1•.. j 1•1_►..•a,.w•4 'IN......a•4 • ..m.LY.o..r 11•.C.•••. 9700 Ya.rr,..•••N•IY- IMND.•.. • • BUILDING 'C' thh BUILDING 'B' ill BUILDING 'A' _ I v•ass, m cl=Eg EEEIZIEE EEIL RIB I I FIFR® ® �L. l ri:i® Q �'' —--fir 41.T..78.•a n 1w T-7-1-7. war o a�n� _ e EB --I -- Z TO.eLae 1' - 1 f - I �1 D(T""NCE t '- I �I1._6. O vrRl.a:w0[ Y la Lw at 4IV0I444L Z SOUTHWEST ELEVATION • c far CITY OF SEATILE PIPELINE RO.W. 0 SCALE:1/16.•1•40• Z i Y® W OF F4 4 Z a W g BUILDING 'A' BUILDING 'A' • wYl1,62va,W a 1ranLTl2v.,a211 �, ve PM /6 1,3. i0�0 PLOTatEEI LKO3.14Ka l.u�E.ECM, I /rye- e______ E1-3 QoRATE h --1111111111_ Y 10'O esi00t i0.61f4. .I U Efg • ,-1 S (,�-{j{.�.��I�7�] IT�m I-I�I'�[[77'��(�7T'II FIRER EEL ®®® rvo.arLaa ""I" 0 E® EE�11 1111 FRITI.-l-ll--l-a FIRER FIRTI EC_7_® ®— ,volI16L �, m$'S� iIi 5r•e oort�. _ J— r= 1_�1 . 1=1 =11 1 1 -V�a.,r� —{')y—aT'6• p5•h 1 .__ __- -_- ___ . .-._. _i , — Eb1TWG' '.7' V g ' T1Sys.H1pp Ua IT6R WlrMK Q G�3 SOUTHEAST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATIONrg MAIN ENTRANCE LOGAN STREET ...6 SITE PLAN SET SCALE,VI6••1•-0• 0 an: OCT.Ti,ai SCALE,1/I6••I'-0• e 1• r�*' ar _ 0 1®, - 2 RENTON Alf AS.I '" eron 8 • •••• • • F�IIV :.:•::• • :••••••••:••••••:•::••::••::>:::>::.»:::::••::••::::::••:>.:::>:>:>::>::: :•: G...EXA►MII ER....... rIC:. : E n c�N oY any, ::::::::::::::;: COUNCIL CHAMBERS,•SECOND FLOOR,RENTON MUNI•IPA...L::BU.I-DIN• ............................ .>:<...;,.;»»>;pp.><;a>:ion(,) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order to which th.e. will be>heard:<>::perms::w►li>:be::called:;for:hearin >:at>the::d sc a :.: <:: :> .......y.............:........:.::::::::::::.::::.::::::.:................................................... .............:....i......r..tion:af:the::Heann ..Exarn�ner>.:>>:>:::::::.><:>:>::::>::>::>::::>::><: PROJECT NAME: Renton 100 Apartments (pally Project) PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a four story mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave. S (approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor. parking garage (145 parking stalls)for apartment residents, and 110 multi-family residential units on the upper three levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approximately 50 feet, with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. Location: 255 Logan Avenue S., City block between Logan Avenue S. and Morris Avenue S. and between S. 3rd Street and S. 2nd Street. • AGNDA.DOC i City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: December 9, 1997 Project Name: Renton 100 Apartments Applicant/ Daily Homes Inc. Address: 3316 Fuhrman Avenue E.,#100 Seattle, WA. 98102 Owner/ City of Renton Address: 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA. 98055 • File Number: LUA-097-155, SA-H, ECF Project Manager: Peter Rosen Project Description: Proposal to construct a four story mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave. S (approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage (145 parking stalls) for apartment residents, and 110 multi- ' family residential units on the upper three levels (93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approximately 50 feet, with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. Project Location: 255 Logan Avenue S., City block between Logan Avenue S.and Morris Avenue S. and between S. 3rd Street and S. 2nd Street. i , RINTON HIGH SCHOOL , 1111 NW mot 1101 h-r-- t MP Ille MI • • No�ll` MEIN 11 an 0 400 S ler Alg ' S. 2 imi u20 - p�, p� mom a z in INNRm. � zr IN �—4 1" .113,TN _ on ■ 1101111 r. MI :III 11111°° -- b -. .,j1A3'IKyQ .. ME A MI .:71:, - , po ill. i M -may tti $ r i4~ ✓ /� g IMI� r ME M : mem � 625 --i— i �� 1nn - r . ■1 -. S 2 MOM City of Renton P/B/PW Department Premmaary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 9, 1997 Page 2 of 12 E. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: City of Renton 2. Zoning Designation: Center Downtown 3. Comprehensive Plan Center Downtown Land Use Designation: 4. Existing Site Use: Vacant, previously used for auto lot 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Commercial-Tire Shop, vacant single-family residence, Renton High School East: Commercial-Auto sales lot, former Sound Mazda garage, Renton Piazza/Plaza South: Commercial- Sporting goods store, movie theater, apartments West: Commercial-Salvation Army, food bank, accounting office, single-family residence. 6. Access: Main entrance to parking garage from Seattle pipeline right-of-way accessed off Logan Ave. S. or Morris Ave. S. Commercial uses accessed off Logan Ave. S. 7. Site Area: 53,962 s.f. 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: NA New Building Area: 93,398 s.f. residential 4,610 s.f. commercial 44,252 s.f. garage area Total Building Area: 44,913 s.f.total floor area C. HISTORICAUEACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation Incorporated 1901 Comprehensive Plan 4498 2/20/95 Zoning 4404 6/7/93 HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 9, 1997 Page 3 of 12 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: Water: There is an existing 12-inch diameter water line in S. 3rd Street. The water lines in Morris, Second and Logan vary in sizes from 4 to 6-inch in diameter. The water lines are being replaced with larger diameter mains (12-inch ) to meet the required fire flow by the City of Renton Water Utility during the 1998 spring construction season, with appropriate spacing of new fire hydrants in coordination with the Daily project. Sewer: There is an existing 12-inch diameter sanitary sewer on the north side of the proposed project and in Logan Avenue. An 8-inch diameter sewer line serves the parcels to the south of the pipeline right-of-way. Surface Water/Storm Water: There are existing 12-inch diameter storm drain lines in the rights-of-way surrounding the site, as well as in the Seattle Pipeline property. A preliminary storm water report with calculations determining whether water quality facilities or detention is required was received with the application. 2. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department 3. Transit: Site is located adjacent to Renton Transit Center, numerous bus routes available. 4. Schools: Highlands Elementary School, McKnight Middle School, Renton High School. 5. Recreation: Renton Piazza (planned concurrent with proposal), Liberty Park, Cedar River Trail E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Center Downtown (CD) F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Downtown Element G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks approval of a proposed 4 story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Avenue S. (approx. 4,610 s.f), a ground floor parking garage (145 parking stalls) for apartment residents, and 110 multi-family residential units on the 3 upper levels (93,398 s.f.). HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155, SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 9, 1997 Page 4 of 12 The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into 3 attached building wings oriented around 2 landscaped plazas. The average height of the building at parapets is approximately 50 feet,with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. The 2 landscaped courts (total area of approximately 14,500 square feet) are located above the first level parking garage. The landscaped courts include a series of terraced planter beds,wood bench seating,tile paving and walkways. The main entrance to the parking garage (intended for residents) would be from the Seattle pipeline right-of-way accessed off Logan Ave. S. or Morris Ave. S. A secondary entrance is proposed from the alley at the northwest corner of the building. There is a street-level pedestrian entry to a lobby serving the residential apartments at the southeast corner of the property on Logan Ave. S. The commercial space may be divided into individual leasable spaces with separate entrances from Logan Avenue S. Downtown Renton Revitalization Plan The subject proposal is a major component in redevelopment efforts presently underway for downtown Renton. The overall objective of the revitalization effort is to promote a mix of residential, office, retail, civic/public spaces, and entertainment opportunities in downtown Renton. There are several projects and public improvements that are planned to relate directly to the proposed multi-family residential and retail development. 1) Renton Transit Center- The existing temporary transit hub now located along Burnett Avenue S.will be reconfigured into a T-design,with permanent loading platforms located between Burnett Avenue S. and Logan Avenue S. The project is a joint venture between the City and King County Metro. Design work will begin in January 1998, with construction scheduled in 1999. 2) Logan Avenue Improvements - Public right-of-way improvements to Logan Avenue S., between 2nd and 3rd Streets S are planned. The improvements will include widening the sidewalks to 12 feet on the west side of Logan Avenue S. adjacent to the Daily project and 6 feet on the east side of the street. Street trees, furnishings, lighting and on-street parking are also envisioned. Construction is also scheduled for 1998. 3) Renton Piazza or Downtown Park - There are three aspects of this project. The Renton Piazza is located across Logan Avenue adjacent to the southeast of the subject site. The park or plaza is envisioned as a central gathering place for activities and events in the downtown area. The Seattle pipeline right-of-way is planned to be improved with 50 parking spaces to serve downtown activities and for overflow/guest parking for the Daily project, as well as providing a pedestrian trail and landscaping. The "gateway" parcel, located at the northwest corner of S. 3rd Street and Logan Ave. S. is planned as an extension of the park/piazza with an objective of providing a transition or gateway to the downtown core. The site is located south of the Daily project and it is anticipated that it would be designed to coordinate with the entry, tower feature at the southeast corner of the apartment building. 4) Former Sound Mazda Auto Dealership Garage - This City-owned building is located across Logan Avenue S. to the east of the Daily project and directly north of the proposed park. The City is pursuing the sale and future private use of this building. Several potential scenarios are under analysis, including small retail shops, a farmer's market, community building, and building removal/park expansion. A decision on the future of this building is expected in 1998. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Preninmary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 9, 1997 Page 5 of 12 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971 as amended), on November 12, 1997 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated. The comment/appeal period for the SEPA threshold determination ended on December 1, 1997. No appeals were filed. Comments received were considered in the SEPA analysis and do not warrant reconsideration of the SEPA threshold determination or mitigation measures. 3 COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES The Environmental Review Committee adopted the following SEPA mitigation measures. 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per multi- family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated to be$45,077.20. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated to be$39,862.50. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 5. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi- family dwelling unit. Up to 33% of the required Parks impact fee may be met by providing on-site recreation amenities. The required mitigation fee shall be subject to the approval of the Parks Department and the Development Services Division, and the fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-31-33 (D.) "The Hearing Examiner and City staff shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria. These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton. However,strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable. These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site, but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pre 'ry Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 9, 1997 Page 6 of 12 discourage creativity and innovation. The Site Plan Review criteria include, but are not limited to,the following:" (5A) GENERAL CRITERIA: (1) CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS & POLICIES The site is designated Center Downtown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The intent of the designation is to"create a balance of land uses which contribute to the revitalization of downtown Renton" and to "reinforce downtown Renton as the regional commercial district in the City". (Objectives DT-A and DT-B) The proposal is consistent with the following Downtown Element policies. Policy DT-1. There should be a mix of uses, including retail, office, light industrial and residential, which generate the demand for goods and services. The proposed residential and retail uses are appropriate to the designation. Policy DT-3. Development and redevelopment of Center Downtown should strive for urban density and intensity of uses. The net density of the proposal is about 88.80 units per acre. Policy DT-4. Ground floor uses with street frontage along Wells Avenue South between Houser Way and South 2nd Street and along South 3rd Street between Main Avenue South and Burnett Avenue South should be limited to businesses which primarily cater to walk-in customer traffic(Le.retail goods and services)in order to generate and maintain continuous pedestrian activity in these areas. Walk-in customer oriented businesses should also be encouraged to locate along street frontages in the remainder of the Historic Downtown Core district and the West End district. Although outside the areas identified in Policy DT-4, the ground floor commercial uses along the street frontages appear to be those that would cater to walk-in customer traffic. Policy DT-5. Redevelopment of the downtown area should be encouraged to maintain and revitalize the downtown core. The proposal would revitalize the downtown both through the addition of consumer opportunities and the creation of a 24 hour residential population. Policy DT-6. The redevelopment of downtown Renton as a multi-use Urban Center should be encouraged to create a center for the community. Policy DT-8. Development in the Center Downtown designation should conform to the Downtown Renton Association's Vision. The proposal is consistent with the DRA's Vision. Policy DT-10. Development should be low-(1-5 stories) and mid-rise (6-10 stories) with an overall average floor to area ratio (FAR)of 2:1 within the Center Downtown designation on the Land Use Map. NOTE: The 2:1 FAR is an overall average minimum to be achieved and not intended to require each project or parcel to develop at that specific intensity. The proposal has an FAR of about 4.2:1. Policy DT 15. Mixed use office and residential development may reach heights of 6-10 (medium rise)stories depending on other applicable ordinances(i.e. seismic considerations, airport flight patterns, and aquifer protection areas). Policy DT-19. Promote the clustering of regional commercial uses and discourage the development of strip commercial areas. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B✓PW Department Pren►rin►ary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 9, 1997 Page 7 of 12 Policy DT-22. Maximize the use of existing urban services and civic amenities and revitalize the City's downtown by promoting medium to high density residential development in the downtown area. Allowed densities will conform to the criteria for Urban Centers in the countywide policies. The proposal is low-rise (1-5 stories in Downtown Element), as this is apparently the maximum that the market will currently support. Policy DT-23. Mixed use development where residential, commercial and office uses are allowed in the same building or on the same site, should be encouraged in downtown areas that are suitable for residential development. Incentives should be developed to encourage future development or redevelopment projects that incorporate residential uses. Policy DT-24. Net residential development densities in the downtown area should achieve a range of 25-100 dwelling units per acre. Where parcels are less than one half acre no minimum density is required. The proposal is within the prescribed range. Policy DT-27. Medium-rise residential(6-10 stories)should be located within the urban center, primarily between the Cedar River and South 2nd, and between South 7th and the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way. The area between South 7th and the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way should include a combination of low-(1-5 stories) and medium-rise residential to provide a transition between the employment area and the mixed use core. • Policy DT-28. Unusual attributes of the downtown-cultural opportunities, views, historic development pattern, mix of uses, proximity to the river and transportation amenities- should be used to site residential uses downtown. The proposal appears to be well sited with respect to existing and future development and amenities. Policy DT-29. Parking should be structured whenever feasible and serve more than one use. Policy DT-30. The existing supply of parking should be better managed to encourage joint use rather than parking for each individual business. Policy DT-38. All future development and improvements in downtown should emphasize non-automobile oriented travel both to and within the downtown while maintaining an adequate amount of parking for regional retail customers. Transit and parking programs should be integrated, balanced, and implemented concurrently. Policy DT-40. Site and building design should be pedestrian/people oriented with provisions for transit and automobiles where appropriate. Objective DT-E: Improve the City's pedestrian and bicycle network to improve access to and circulation within the downtown. Policy DT-42. Pedestrian spaces should be emphasized and connected throughout the downtown. Objective DT-F: Improve the visual, physical and experiential quality, lighting and safety, especially for pedestrians, along downtown streets. Policy DT-47. Parking lots and structures should employ and maintain landscaping and other design techniques to minimize the visual impacts of these uses. HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Pre6::"uary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 9, 1997 Page 8 of 12 Objective DT-G: Improve the visual and physical appearance of buildings to create a more positive image for downtown. Policy DT-48. Site and building designs(e.g. signage; building height, bulk and setback; landscaping; parking)should reflect unity of design to create a distinct sense of place and mitigate adverse impacts on adjacent uses. Policy DT-50. A special'tool box"of incentives should be developed to encourage rehabilitation(e.g. facade restoration)of older downtown buildings. Objective DT-H: Maintain and expand the available amenities to make the downtown more appealing to existing and potential customers and residents. Policy DT-54. Downtown development, especially residential, should be designed to take advantage of existing amenities such as the Cedar River, city parks and trails. The project would work with and take advantage of the proposed Piazza. Policy DT-55. Public amenities such as art, fountains, or similar features should be incorporated into the design of public areas, major streets and gateways of the downtown. Policy DT-56. Create downtown focal points that provide spaces for community events and pedestrian activity. Objective DT-I: Retain existing and attract new businesses that generate consumer oriented commercial activity. Policy DT-63. Public/private partnerships should be pursued on projects that will spur additional downtown development. (2) CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS The subject site is located in the Center Downtown (CD) zoning designation. The purpose of the CD zone is to provide a mixed-use commercial center serving a regional market as well as adjacent residences. Uses include a variety of retail sales, personal and professional services, multi-family residential dwellings The CD zone allows multi-family residential uses as a primary permitted use at densities ranging between 25 and 100 dwelling units per net acre. The code also specifies that multi-family residential development may be located in a mixed use building of commercial and residential uses. The proposed project includes 110 multi-family dwelling units on a 53,962 square foot site, calculating to a net density of 88.80 dwelling units per acre. Development Standards The subject site was added to the "Downtown Core Area" by the City Council on August 21, 1997 (Ordinance#4671). Development projects within the Downtown Core Area are exempt from most development standards of the CD zone; including parking, setbacks, lot coverage and landscape requirements. Setbacks - There are minimal building setbacks proposed. The design objective of the proposal is for an intensive urban-scale design. There is a building setback of approximately 6 feet on the west side of the building along Morris Avenue S. The southeast corner of the building with the stair/entry tower feature is also recessed from the property line. There are no setbacks requirements. The CD zones does not require rear or side yard setbacks. The City Council amended the zoning code to delete a street setback requirement for portions of a building exceeding 40 feet in height. The City Council adopted the code amendment on December 1 with an effective date of December 10. HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Prel y Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 9, 1997 Page 9 of 12 Building Height - The CD zone allows a maximum building height of 95 feet. The average height of the proposed building at parapets is approximately 50 feet, with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. The highest building elevation would be 103 feet 8 inches above sea level, which meets the Airport zoning horizontal surface height limit of 179 feet above sea level. Lot Coverage - There is no maximum lot coverage standard for buildings located in the Downtown Core Area. Landscaping -There are no landscape street frontage requirements for buildings located in the Downtown Core Area. The applicant is proposing a series of undulating planters between the building edge and sidewalk along the south building facade frontage of the Seattle pipeline right-of-way and along Moms Avenue S. There are decorative columns and trellises associated with the planters. There are no landscape requirements for landscape/open space areas associated with multi-family dwelling units. The proposal includes 2 landscaped courts (total area of approximately 14,500 square feet) located above the first level parking garage. The landscaped include a series of terraced planter beds, wood bench seating, tile paving and a walkways. Parking - There are no parking requirements in the Downtown Core Area. The proposal includes a parking garage with 145 parking stalls to serve the 110 residential units. This equals a ratio of 1.31 parking spaces per dwelling unit. There are also 50 parking stalls which will be improved off-site in the Seattle pipeline right-of-way and these parking spaces would be available to residents and guests. Outside of the Downtown Core Area, the Parking Code requires 1.5 parking spaces per multi-family dwelling unit and then 1 guest parking space per 4 dwelling units which would equate to a total of 193 parking spaces. The project site is located adjacent to the Renton Transit Center so it is likely that residents of the proposed project would utilize transit at a proportionately higher rate. (3) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USES; The subject site is located in downtown Renton and is surrounded mostly by various commercial uses. The proposed residential project is not anticipated to adversely impact the use of surrounding properties or uses. In fact, the CD zone envisions downtown Renton as an urban center accommodating a mix of residential and commercial uses developed at a high-density, intensity level. The potential conflicts between different uses was evaluated with the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning for downtown. A residential population in downtown will provide a customer base to complement existing and future commercial development. The size, bulk and height of the proposed building would be greater than the existing pattern of building and development in downtown. The three upper residential levels are broken into separate wings which reduces the overall mass of the structure, and avoids an appearance of an over-concentration of structures. The proposal is consistent with the CD zone provisions and the zoning anticipates a departure from the existing conditions and land use patterns in downtown toward a more intensive use of properties. The northeast corner of the proposed building would be constructed adjacent to the property line and would be separated by approximately 7 feet from the back of the adjacent tire store building. The residential units are constructed over the top of the parking garage and would have a view over the tire store. The rear of the tire store building is oriented toward the proposed development and therefore the store would not be impacted. Construction activities on the site would result in some noise, dust and traffic impacts on surrounding properties. These impacts would be limited to the construction phase of the project, which is estimated to have a total duration of approximately 12 months (April HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Pre!it hnary Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 9, 1997 Page 10 of 12 1998 to April 1999). It is not anticipated that construction activities would have a direct, significant impact that could impede the use of surrounding properties. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan outlining mitigation measures to be employed for minimizing dust, noise and traffic impacts during construction. (4) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE; There are no significant natural or human-made features on the site that would be impacted by the proposed development. The subject site is presently vacant and covered with impervious surfaces from the previous use of the site as an auto sales and storage lot. The proposal would construct a building covering approximately 90% of the site area, replacing the existing impervious surfaces with building. The proposal would upgrade utilities and stormwater facilities thereby mitigating impacts associated with development of the site. The three upper levels of the residential building are broken up into separate, attached building wings. The building wings are oriented around landscaped courts and also are designed with a south-facing orientation. This building placement would enhance sun exposure for residents. The ground floor and street level of the proposed building would mostly consist of the parking garage, except for the commercial component of the proposal which faces Logan Avenue S. The applicant is proposing a series of undulating planters along the building frontages facing the Seattle pipeline right-of-way and Morris Avenue S. There are decorative columns and trellises associated with the planters. The planters and landscaping would soften and mitigate the appearance of a parking garage over long expanses of the building facades. The view of the parking garage is not screened with landscaping only on the north elevation of the building which faces the alley and is generally not within public view or the view of surrounding properties. There is an 18 foot wide piece of land on the north side of the Seattle pipeline right-of- way that is not presently owned by the City nor the applicant. The proposal includes this land as a part of the proposed development. The City has been negotiating to obtain this property and will begin the condemnation process if necessary to obtain the property. (5) CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES: The proposed mix-use development is expected to increase property values in the downtown. Adding residential population to downtown would improve the customer base for commercial businesses and this is expected to increase property values. (6) SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION; The main entrance to the parking garage for the apartment residents would be from the Seattle pipeline right-of-way which has access from Logan Ave. S. and Morris Ave. S. The City of Renton and the City of Seattle Water Department are in negotiations for a franchise agreement that would convey surface rights over the pipeline area to the City for purposes of public parking and for a park (Renton Piazza and gateway areas). Although, the details of the franchise agreement are not yet finalized, there is a signed memorandum of understanding conveying the surface rights for parking and park use to Renton in perpetuity. If an agreement is not secured by the construction of the Daily project, the main access into the parking garage may have to be changed to Morris Avenue S. or the alley. The parking garage has been designed if this change is required. I-IEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Prel y Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 9, 1997 Page 11 of 12 A secondary entrance for the garage is proposed from the alley at the northwest corner of the building. There is a street-level pedestrian entry to a lobby serving the apartments, located at the southeast corner of the property on Logan Ave. S. The commercial space may be divided into individual leasable spaces with separate entrances from Logan Avenue S. The proposed circulation pattern works well with the existing street system and the proposed Transit Center. The planned sidewalk improvements along Logan Avenue S. and the Seattle pipeline will improve pedestrian circulation related to the project and for downtown. The trash and loading area is provided at the northwest corner of the building for the apartment residents. The trash area for the commercial area is indicated at the northeast corner of the building. These locations could be accessed from the alley and would not conflict with vehicular or pedestrian circulation. (7) PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR: The 3 upper levels of the proposed building are broken into separate, attached building wings. This allows light and air exposure to reach all of the residential dwelling units. Directly south of the subject site is the Seattle pipeline right-of-way. This area cannot be developed with structures and therefore assures the proposed development of a south exposure in perpetuity. (8) MITIGATION OF NOISE. ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS: It is anticipated that the most significant noise, odor and other potentially harmful impacts would occur during the construction phase of the project. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which provides mitigations to construction impacts such as noise, hours of construction, control of dust, etc. The proposed development would not generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. There would be noise impacts of increased traffic and activity that are normally associated with a residential population. (9) AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE:AND There are adequate and available public services and facilities to accommodate the • proposed development. A discussion of existing utilities and planned improvements is provided on page 3 of this report. The applicant will be assessed fire and park mitigation fees to compensate for the increased demand on public services. (10) PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT. The proposal would redevelop and improve an existing, vacant site in downtown Renton. The investment in the area and the added presence of a residential population would serve to prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Prei • • y Report to the Hearing Examiner RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 9, 1997 Page 12 of 12 H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Renton 100 Apartments, Project File No. LUA-97-155, SA- H, ECF subject to the following condition: (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination prior to the issuance of a building permit. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals (SA): Two (2)years from the final approval (signature) date. HEXRPT.DOC • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Renton 100 Apartments • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks approval of a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S (approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage (145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels (93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet, with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. - LOCATION OF PROPOSAL 255 Logan Avenue South MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per multi-family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building: The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated to be$45,077.20. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payabie,prior to the issuance of Building Permits. ' 3. The applicant shall.be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip • associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated to be$39,862.50. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. _ 4. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 5. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. Up to 33% of the required Parks impact fee may be met by providing on-site recreation amenities. The required mitigation fee shall be subject to the approval of the Parks Department and the Development Services Division, and the fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF • APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Renton 100 Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks approval of a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing . Logan Ave S (approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage (145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels (93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx.50 feet, with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 255 Logan Avenue South • Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1. Tenant storage is not allowed in the parking garage. . FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 3,750 gpm. Four fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed structure and three fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required. The City water main system in the street would satisfy the looped main requirement. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout all structures. 3. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout all structures. • 4. An approved dry standpipe system is required to be installed throughout the structure., - • PLAN REVIEW . • EXISTING CONDITIONS Water-There is an existing 12-inch diameter water line in S. 3rd Street. The water lines in Morris, Second and Logan vary in sizes from 4 to 6-inch in diameeter. The water lines are being replaced with larger diameter mains (12-inch)to meet the required fire flow by the City of Renton Water Utility during the 1998 spring construction season,with appropriate spacing of new fire hydrants in coordination with the Daily project. Sewer-There is an existing 12-inch diameter sanitary sewer on the north side of the proposed project and in Logan Avenue. An 8-inch diameter sewer line serves the parcels to the south of the pipeline right- of-way. • Storm -There are existing 12-inch diameter storm drain lines in the rights-of-way surrounding the site, • as well as in the Seattle Pipeline property. A preliminary storm water report with calculations determining whether water quality facilities or detention is required was received with the application. • • Renton 100 Apartments LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Page2of2 Streets -The adjacent streets are fully improved with sidewalks, curb and gutter, paving and street lighting. Logan will be upgraded in conjunction with the Piazza improvements in the 1998 construction season. • CODE REQUIREMENTS Water 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.113 per square foot of property. The fee for 54,310 square feet is$6,137.03. Sanitary Sewer 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.078 per square foot of property. The fee for 54,310 square feet is$4,236.18. Surface Water 1. The System Development Charge is not triggered by this development as no additional impervious surface is created. Plan Review-General 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. ... 2. A construction permit is required.When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to • call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. POLICE-104 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually • CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. - I also recommend the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing"signs on the property while it's-- . under construction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED COMPLEX Coded access as entry to each building is recommended to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property. Each unit should have solid core,doors, prefeYably metal.or metal over solid wood with peep holes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2" in length when extended and installed with 3"wood screws. Sliding windows, including the glass patio doors,will need additional locks;these locks will need to secure the windows from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. The stairways at the complex should be constructed of lattice or metal railing so visibility is possible through the stairway; There should not be any solid walls in any stairway that would serve to limit the visibility up and down the stairs and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a homeowner to return home. In additional,the balcony walls also need to be made of either metal or wood lattice or railing - no solid walls for the same purpose. Renton 100 Apartments • ::' ::; LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF • Advisory Notes (Continued) Page3of3 • Extra security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the sidewalks, in the stairways, and alleyway. Each unit should have their individual unit numbers listed clearly,with the number at least 6" in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and placed under a light. This will aid police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit they need to go to. • Landscaping around the exterior and interior of the plaza should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a unit. Parking garages are targeted frequently by criminals, so it's important to have any entrance into the parking garage be a monitored'security entrance. Either a security guard or coded entrance to this part of the building is recommended. Strong lighting is also needed in this type of enclosure to keep tenants safe while they're walking to and from their vehicle. Since part of this building will be a shopping center, it's extremely important to keep the living entrances and shop entrances separate from one another. Having a public and private building mixed together i could encourage loitering and it could make it difficult to ascertain who belongs on the premises and who does not after hours. All individual shops should adhere to the same structural recommendations as mentioned above for the apartment units(i.e., solid core entrance doors, locking devices, peepholes, etc.) Each back door to each business will need auxiliary locking devices, in addition to heavy-duty deadbolt locks (such as latch guard and pry-resistant cylinders around the locks). Each business needs a security alarm system. Access to the back of the buildings should be limited, preferably with security fencing. After the businesses have closed,this area could become dangerous due to the lack of natural surveillance by business merchants or tenants. AIRPORT Tenants should be notified of the proximity of the Renton Airport. 'Failure to do otherwise may result in increased workload to airport staff as a result of complaints from tenants. The proposed 100-unit apartment complex is located just east of the extended centerline of the Renton Airport. It is significant to note that a majority of aircraft turn east over or in the near vicinity of the proposed complex at very low altitude: This area, prior to approval of the.complex,should be declared compatible with the operation of the airport and the flight at very low altitudes by aircraft 7 days a week and 24-hours per day, in the City's Comprehensive Plan. PROJECT LUA-97-155 SA-H, ECF Renton 100 Apts. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL& DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 104 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction(flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED COMPLEX Coded access as entry to each building is recommended to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property. Each unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood with peep holes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2" in length when extended and installed with 3" wood screws. Sliding windows, including the glass patio doors, will need additional locks; these locks will need to secure the windows from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. The stairways at the complex should be constructed of lattice or metal railing so visibility is possible through the stairway. There should not be any solid walls in any stairway that would serve to limit the visibility up and down the stairs and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a homeowner Page 1 of 2 PROJECT LUA-97-155 SA-H, ECF Renton 100 Apts. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) to return home. In additional, the balcony walls also need to be made of either metal or wood lattice or railing-no solid walls for the same purpose. Extra security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the sidewalks, in the stairways, and alleyway. Each unit should have their individual unit numbers listed clearly, with the number at least 6" in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and placed under a light. This will aid police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit they need to go to. Landscaping around the exterior and interior of the plaza should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a unit. Parking garages are targeted frequently by criminals, so it's important to have any entrance into the parking garage be a monitored security entrance. Either a security guard or coded entrance to this part of the building is recommended. Strong lighting is also needed in this type of enclosure to keep tenants safe while they're walking to and from their vehicle. Since part of this building will be a shopping center, it's extremely important to keep the living entrances and shop entrances separate from one another. Having a public and private building mixed together could encourage loitering and it could make it difficult to ascertain who belongs on the premises and who does not after hours. All individual shops should adhere to the same structural recommendations as mentioned above for the apartment units (i.e., solid core entrance doors, locking devices, peepholes, etc.) Each back door to each business will need auxiliary locking devices, in addition to heavy-duty deadbolt locks (such as latch guard and pry-resistant cylinders around the locks). Each business needs a security alarm system. Access to the back of the buildings should be limited, preferably with security fencing. After the businesses have closed, this area could become dangerous due to the lack of natural surveillance by business merchants or tenants. Page 2 of 2 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/, ..blic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: rA.\W l- COMMENTS DUE: 10/17/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 10/31/97 APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton 100 Apts. WORK ORDER NO: 78294 LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S., City block between Logan Ave S and Morris Ave S between S 3rd St. and S 2nd St. SITE AREA: 53,962 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 144,913 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S(approx.4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet,with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth X Housing X Air X Aesthetics X — Water X Light/Glare X Plants X Recreation X Land/Shoreline Use X Utilities X Animals X Transportation X Environmental Health X Public Services X Energy/ X HistorlciCuitural X Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet ,�(eS 14,000 Feet 11�� The location of a 100-unit apartment complex shbuld::be permitted only with a require- ment that tenants be notified of the proximity of the Renton Airport. Failure to do otherwise may result in increased workload to airport staff as a result of complaints from tenants. Consider possible mitigation fee if this results. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS The proposed 100-unit apartment complex is located just east of the extended centerline of the Renton Airport. It is. significant to note that a majority of aircraft turn east over or in the near vicinity of the proposed complex at very low altitude. This area, prior to the approval of the complex, should be declared Compatible with thee. operation of the airport and the flight at very low altitudes by aircraft 7 days a week and 24-hours per day, in the City's Comprehensive Plan. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS NA We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where add'• - information eded to properly assess this proposal. t/� / V ! •l /v ZO f Signature• erector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.'• Rev.10/93 • fY CITY OF RENTON jrn , FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: November 7, 1997 TO: Peter Rosen, Associate Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-Related Comments for Daly Homes 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 3,750 gpm. Four fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and three fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of building in the parking and commercial area and at the rate of$388 per multi-family unit in the residential area: 4,610 square feet x $0.52 = $2,397.20 110 units x $388.00 = $42,680.00 Total $45,077.20 This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 5. An approved dry standpipe system is required to be installed throughout the structure. CT:ct Daly TRANSPORTATION 1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee shall be assessed for the 531.5 additional daily trips to this site at a rate of $75.00 per trip. This fee has been calculated to be $39,862.50 including the credit for the previous use. PLAN REVIEW- GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. CC: Neil Watts DALLYGF.DOC • •`CYo • v n R) LIPtif �,,,,►,'t�!!ba.>:+• .»w,��,��,:�tywoW%oN�r� .•. ».}54:..,�:.,.;.�:yyoy,�•4V. .:X w •,•'` ��f ',,7.')•.alWiofg09x+u[ .viAlw :.;iww.fMfXYM`:Y.'RI: r1�.XM'r.f% �'NY.N M4Dw9VTRM.ypjOa .M, . FEE Project Name A.-to 100 Apo vt wicvtts Project Address 255 1-0Ljaii Ave. S Contact Person Ctia✓lie Latioc(cc IDAlly Home IhG. Address 331(0 Fully wiavv rove E ,,# 10O 1 SeatIe 10 2 Phone Number (2°6) - 32$- 3770 • Permit Number L i)A1 - q(7 -- )5 5 Project Description 1=ouv STOVE) xc( ttkeb)c � — 1)( ID c.?. covtn Ue✓cia,/l 1)0 apa✓twittJ Lh,l5 a ei 1 LI5 laavk;Kc s t41s . Ste- avca 63(14.2 5.1: Ai L Rise A ,(223) Land Use Type: , Method�of'Calculation: pa,lcl yule logo lv,yi Q'1Residential L�' ITE Trip Generation Manual .tom ��1 R,se (2za) h� O"Retail 0/Traffic Study ovi Pick cowlPuv,Sel ❑ Non-retail El Other 4.62 tviP s u viz z. • � $� prcJ. Stidies : s11 �Yr ' 57.22 S SPcukltr Re Akty Sales 3 ,1-f4 awi e- 1 toil (414) L10.67 twit �.i io ° Calculation: Assu^we 25°10 pi,fl41 Vrj gips E Sic; t . (p3g) (57.22 x,5-1 )(-If) 23. o(411 y tr1Ps Dcvrlopec( site . ( to)(4.62) -r C1 )00.67 (0.25 555.1d ,000 ) ) =- u►I -�V, • Resr�:gfia� c...eval i 1 . tutu 1:61.111 trips (55 . 1 ) — (23. 6 ) = 531. 5 cIci/j vips • At .75 p,,, tvy (531. 5)(75) _ 39, U2. 50 Transportation Mitigation Fee: (r3-q1s6e.. 50 Calculated by: /V t?/ -6 Date: 10/20%f 7 Account Number: • Date of Payment : . • ,:":••••••••••;" 1:: " k ••'•'•••SERVICES FEE REVIE.,,,,3V/ - -.,,•DEyEcipmr.qs7 ROUTING SLIP El •"-:•••••ENVIRONMENTALyCHECKLIST.REVIEW SkIlETEl • . OTHER •••••• : • • • RECEIVED JOB ADDRESS:m S . 2 ,i/9 4...7_?4,flot) • . : •• e NATURE OF WORK:- •••••• 4jyçp fie.;.,/ilEkeioi., •"11--"-bilii':GREEN# • • ••-• •• im SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND'CONNECTION FEES APPLIED;; NEED MORE INFORMATION: .1=1 'LEGAL DESCRIPTIO: • 't 0 SPECIAiL:ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE ' CI f•-•VICINITY MAP .• :'•NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE 0 OTHER - :":'VESTED '1!•;:-.1=1 NOT VESTED •':• 0 -is.:This fee reviewsupersedes and cancels -Lt 7-02 7::dated 7-0. 77 •. :• P11)11.(subject tochange)_ SUBJECT •••••••':' SDBJECT PROPERTY PIM :.7 ITci/8 0 -Do 3 0 King Co:"Tax Acct,(new) - - • - . '••--•••••.•.,:. •• • •1 • ..• It is the intent of this fee analysis to put the clevplopoWner on notice;that the fees qupted.ke;oiv...may be applicibletothe subject site upon •.... .'--...,-..:development of the-prePertY;''../ill quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and Plyab;p.ictheti.rneth-e o.Oniyuotion.permit is issued to install the on -' and off-site improvements(i.e.undergrOundutilitiei;streptimproi.rementsete.)...Trigiering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. ' • Please note that these fees are iubject.tochange without notice Final fees will be based on rates in affect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit • The quoted nection fees side swer pem1ts nw permit fees or the cost of water meters . . . •• SPECIAL ASSESSMENT • DISTRICT • PARCEL ''•.:.,','.... METHOD OF ASSESSMENT .ASSESSMENT , 7 DISTRICTS -; . . NO ASSESSMENT UNITS ' "•••OR TEE Latecomer Agreement( it)WATER Latecomer Areement(p vt)WASTEWATER . Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER . • 1• 2 •'';;•.;;•Zte•zi•:;,q:'.!:i'::1-‘Y..4:: • 4 SpeciaIAssessmentDistrictJWATER • SpeCial Assessment District/WASTEWATER • • •Joint Use Agreement(METRO) . • • Local ImProitinent * -• • Traffic Benefit $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION •'•-• 7. FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE.7•••,...WATER #OF UNITS! SDC.FEE 2'. El Pd Prev. T.0 Parially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 7.-81 .1-Never I'd -:: •••:.• • . . _ . . . Single family'residential$850/unit • • •• Mobile home'dWelling4tnit$680/unit • . •••••Apartment,-Coride$510/niiit not in 056i:COR zones x • ". Commercial/Indu.trial,:$0.113/sii.'ft:•.:Of GI• 37 Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus15ft Perimeter:PA00 CP4 SYS-i'EM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE WASTEWATER ••-; •.• •- .• • D Pd 'Partially.Pd(Ltd Exemption) M Never Pd • • Single family residential dwelling Unit$585/unit • • • --Mobile hoine dwelling'Unit$468/tinit -•-. - • • • • - . • Apartment, Condo$350/unit not in CD'orCOR zones • • • - • , • ' $0.078/sij.'ft.;'of property. ihar458.5.00i X..;.• • 's- t--••• I/2 '3 6, /R • '1 REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New-.Old Ildiv)/NeW Flo'w AbOveFeeS • . •• •-• • %. 7• • •• • SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • • o Pd El:Partia‘lly Pd -f.lisTever-Pd • -• • - • Single family residential and nibbile hOnie`dv'velling unit$385/unit 1 ;-•::All other Projk17.0i. _Of newjmpervious:area.of PFP11g70.,x,...,1:?:1;:i.i:, "':•. iiof leis thaii$385.00) ;PRELIMINARY:TOTAL ...;::107•:;:j 7 • - • • • • ;.; ••• .• 4-<• ;•••'€•;• `.•' • • •- efr."4.1 " Ft- '•• '4•"'• •" •-•• •''' • I f•••'' • :•CF:ii• , Signature of Reviewing Auth ty 'ATE • • ; '• ' •;••.•••••••‘.'-'0%;:•-•.i-7i•" • subjectpropertx:is,vq in An"LID,-,:tt ts.'llevelopersielponsji?ilityto:cl! 4cyitij:thepinaqce W7':•fo tiripaid.stitu .•:[,. 13..1 *4-The square footage figures Used are taken froni:th4King County.,Assessor map and are.approximate c:/teowlatelfecapp/tg :.,,,i3EFFECTIVE 1'416,11995/Ord. ; . • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building I. ...olio Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 9LS COMMENTS DUE: 10/17/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 10/31/97 APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton 100 Apts. WORK ORDER NO: 78294 LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S., City block between Logan Ave S and Morris Ave S between S 3rd St. and S 2nd St. . SITE AREA: 53,962 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 144,913 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S(approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet,with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation _ Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet G l 712) 4 • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMNTSIE,/ ta-/249 ,6e:y4 7.7a0 771.61-1Y7, , ://) 6- vi C1-i AR G'1Lrc VYJ ct°-‘O `-- 47) 4-474. .,, VIAei-e--,-_ ,„-a-2(f- / .-t71/)0/P7-26-C_.-.4)A,c_7' a 7-- c-,. .c.."(i_k__ ir-x- 4// 2-t-Lc-t C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ir-ZbE-- 71C1 , r?e)17 e-q— , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infonnation Is ne ed to properly assess thiss proposal. �.1.1,4 / Data/2.// ) , Signa ure of Director or Authoriz Representative DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • • City or Renton Department of Planning/Building/PUallc Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Cov‘stvua,tnn � COMMENTS DUE: 10/17/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 10/31/97 APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton 100 Apts. WORK ORDER NO: 78294 LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S., City block between Logan Ave S and Morris Ave S between S 3rd St. and S 2nd St. SITE AREA: 53,962 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 144,913 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S(approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet,with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HlstoriclCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS vt f- I-Dv^ I/Ac) e- L--U c7a We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ( � 2_ 3 r7 Signature of Director or uthorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • • F.,?„t., it1f- ''1 1 Till I I/' I ii) • LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONSULTANTS INDEX OF DRAWINGS Q PARCELA ARCHITECT: ARCHITECTURAL 'A' KTH ARCHITECTS .W1 LOTS 6•1,BLOC L SPITLER.Six,ADDITION TD TIE TOW OF WOO NOR.,WAY EAST,SUITE 3L pRENTOµ..CORD,.TO TIE PLAT THEREOF,RECAFCED N BELLEWE.WA 9Bm05 SECTION 0 PROJECT INFORMATION vOLUPE]6 OF PLATS,PAGE•T,N KI G=NM..02 GTOA SCOTT RACKET .1 TITLE SHEET/GENERAL NOTES [METIER WITHTW.T PORTION OF nE ALLEY ADJACENT TO SAID SECTION 1 SITE INFORMATIONp.-\ LOT 6 VACATED BY CITY OF RNTON ORDNANCE RIMER]nB STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: m 'P, ' UMiGH ATTACHED BY OPERATION 6 LAW EERING EC SITE PLAN - w CT EFGN t E NICKEReON srRFEi wrtE>w SECTION 2 BUILDING PLANS SITE CH.LE.WA 9D¢9 — I PARCEL O GJdFEES GRIFFIn Nl GARAGE LEVEL RAY 17 fl¢6)]DS-•SO d]] PLAZA/L£VEL R-1 RAN 111 LOTS],ROUGH 5,S.W.. .BLOCK L MOTOR LIFE ADDITICJ A. LEVEL R-]PLAN TO RENTOR AC RONG TO TLE PLAT EJERECR,RECORDED N CIVIL ENGINEER: Au LEVEL R-3 PLAN VOLUME 9 6 PLATE.PAGE 50.N KRG COWTY.WASHNGTON DODOS ENGINEER$ i 3¢s uen AVENUE.SUITE]mo SECTION•3 d d PLANS PLANS O BELLEWE,WA 58001 ,d1.e FLOOR .AN9 Tq BC)GE DODDS A. WITS B,BL!07 FLOOR PLANS (4252 e05-1011 d` WIT B3 FLOOR RAN -••' WITS pG.e.]FLOOR FLANS -ram O TAX ACCOUNT NUMBERS OEOTECHNICALENOINEE& �; WITS o,•uFLOOR PLANS % GEOTECH Cti°VI TAINTS.LNG W TS D!010.0pR FLfi9 G]FLOOR PLAY 13356 NE 20.STREET,SUITE lb C) ` BELLEWE, •Em SECTION 6 BUILDING ELEVATIONS PARCEL A b•be-¢035-mm MAR.R M.G b PARCEL C 969600 ¢¢I0 06 .06)1.1-561056. A. EAST,SOUTHEAST,I SWTHLEST ELEVATION. O VICINITY MAP UBUTELEVATILN '_' 0 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS: �' Norsr y R4_NT Q0 19425LAUCMLN R BEREAVE al. TES SECTION S BUILDING SECTIONS Z z I!•lD bbn dvf]RE BOUTR,SUITE p-I¢6 A6J BUILDING SECTION d-d MN A Mil Imo IY.VNAPDMO KENT,WA 9303]-]03 W AYCILN R BEnwE SECTION 9 STAIR 6 LOBBY PLANS IL SECTIONS A�EI1 G06)2514.55 A61 LOBBY LEVEL 1 O LOBBY LEVEL] FF SURVEYOR: A. LOBBY LEVEL> H DODOS ENGNEERB ASA LOBBY LEVEL• BELLEWE,IL 9D001 200 /- a PROJECT DATA .2 2°°°°1 CIVIL 'C' ~1 (•]UCE D 1511 LIt rTl ILITIE9 14 PROJECT, P.N., Te O. ADDRESS: LOOK•COCAIN AVE 5 g 1EI.,s.See. LANDSCAPE 'L' •CLIENT/DEVELOPET5 DAL,IOMES,NC L LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SSWFWRM V AVENE EAST,SUITE WO PARTIAL LANDSCAPE PLAN-PLAZA I marl..WA 9502 L-3 PARTIAL LANDSCAPE PLAN-PLAZA] CHARLIE LABODA . P•1 (]0W 320-3110 FAX n062 315-4909 • I ' LAND USE BUILDING DATA - ALLOVEU)IP1TD PROPOSED SPACE LEVEL O PLAZA LEVELS R.I.1.2.1. LAND USE ZONE GN-MIXED COIL MIXED LAE PARGNC STORAGE STAIN/ELEV, COTTTECIAL EXTERIOR RESIDENTIAL DOJNTR CORE RESIDENTIAL GARAGE P.EGI LOBBY MAIL COURT BUILDNGA - - - BUILDINGS MELON. RETAIL,PARKING WITS COTIOU BLDG W. COF CN BLDG O ITS BLDG me AREA TEA .5,3 BF, LIVING IDEOK9!TOTAL I I TOTAL LIvrtG IOEMS ITOTAL I I TOTAL LIVING IDECKS ITCTAL!COMMON I TOTAL • I2365 AC OCCUPANCY 6-3 S- R -1 R-1 R 1 R•I g g UA LOT covE08 WLITIITED .5,,"SF. TYPE CF tµiT, TTPE 1-FR TYPE 31-FR TYPE v V.I HR TYPE E I 1•FR N/A TYPE v I IRt TYPE V I H4 TYPE V-I HR N SP o YAi1NUY ILDONEIOHT 95' W1• SQUARE FOOTAGES TOTAL O tR P .LDS.PETIACZ NONE RECO /CROSS 6OJARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA/LSE) FLOOR AREA 25 Leval G 39)1I 2,1. 2AS..1 •6 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0A006] 01 WC B0 9 00 Levet R-I 1•93 99 01 35 B 0A .9 50] 62 359 9221 2,•36 1129E 90• TALI 1533 01 1 a Leval S.] 96J9 1390 .A. 201E 11NA3 9]30 IAA 9902 ]]6! 11501 6,59e 1b.] 1535 B531 33301 ... 3 Ct• PALMING ION1LTE PAI[INS ON 0-LEVEL) Level R-3 9¢36 750 9116 2I19 II]05 923E 1AA 9932 1269 9501 6550 6•A 16. 1533 5531 313•3 LARGE(DAX 02 EXEMPT >I tR el 21,439 3639 3.10 0801 36)•0 21330 IS. . 6,91A 3A812 265.00 I.e. .559 99 1 2 3 N CO'RJACT!V•163 _ bt ALLOWABLE AREAS IMITE° wLIMITED 1¢5¢¢ UNLTITED 63¢04 •]¢e0¢• 63,m% BARRIER EE 1 1 aP•FULLY SPRINKLED BUILDING uSY. L U Z !MA TYPE A•V 0 1_ fB5'21 Sc 16'TON, Y L ggy . RIE BARRFREE/VAN 1 1 UNIT DATA UNIT COUNT Q 1A m y (OFF SITE) WIT DES. TYPE LDNG OTAL WIT CLINT PARALLEL) /SFI SUR-COR R-3 A R-3 TOTAL - R-] O - R-] R-3 TOTAL TCTALlLNGITE PARKING 1 u5 .1010,1 BATH S13 RI 3 3 1 RI RI3 B a 0 < LANDSCAPED AREA ¢ 0 0 3 0 3 - eERR'IETER P G LCLSL NOT REOD :SF. 4] STUDIO,'BATH 592 5 ! > O> 3 ] 3 VIA/R-1 LEVEL I NCT T.00 I 5A6.5F 1 BR I BAn 612 ] ] 3 '1 BR I BAn _ _ 692 _ __ - 3 3 S TE PLAN SET EV EI L BR I EAn m • D ] - 3 DAM OCT.§eV 03 3BR1 BATH 0 m O 3 c 3 BR I BATH 0 z I S RENION MF • 3 13R t Ban 0 • IBR DEN,1 BAn .9 0 3 3 BRIBAn I e _ A.0•] D• 'BR I BAn 095 0 0 a ¢ m ¢ R:BATH 996 ¢ O DI 2 BR a BA, 1603 0 0 O] ]9R 3 BATH l0u m 3 - • TOTALS B L B 35 u IA At 10 ¢ m _¢ 36 31 31 I :L 1 970t3 • L.. .uwuLT MGR / j I NOTE; 4lEY C�FROv51•EHi WA'IPROv'cp BY DALLY wro;s ALLEY To RERAN / EXISTING GCI'PIERGI I NOTE SUBJECT PROPERTY 1 OUTSIDE\ \ — TO REMAIN�� Rss•ea/•E__ net• I ARE SHOWN FOR INFORMATION ONLY iRnv+Rer dL ' nark 0 / My_ R 1 AND ARE NOT A PARE OF THE WORK I amts. Kas•es•E 5.mr ALLEY PROPOSED BY DALLY HOMES. ^I /-� 000sss��Exl 1 (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) / SECONDARY sszsu•eaT: mmmr .'�. , I 0 ' s;�. GARAGE ENTRY UV.- m0• } et s m'- 4' NOTE IAAVUTR(LTPJ IR 9 FOR LANDSCAPING SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN p IDm I I FOR PROJECT DATA/LEGEND LISTING 1,LLo ABOVE a ___ 1 SEE SHEET ADI y. ci 9 ' D W • I 0 �' ' 1 TO BE FEIGNED T Li I,i°� I PROPOSED MIXED USE BUILDING o ii 1 a EwsS'G DOVEW4r - ^ I �..D.T.OPICHED �' DEVELOPMENT BY DALLY HOMES _ I x - ONSIDE SUBJECT PROPERTY UNE) is I MAIN RETAIL /� Q u'..v.• `q ENTRY, •(1 V� [-r IIII �L.c11. I W °1�iitio r m.a Earn O x . EX, • �L'2-is'-D• F-C P-a• II A UT I,CExI•G DR�v£WAY v ', ' ��, �•\ ^ < PANTED OSER 6�E1W.UC TAL M.E 'L.`/�. F•� YO BE FEl'O/ED � 1 At RETAIL FRD2tACE ILA ig �� — II lk I H a Exlsi'G DRIVEWAY ! �PEt/E Pb e i / 1 1 /- a O BE RB`1LYED �N I I '1 ' ►�I a B L� i' • 6ViEW• - I , e , C a ea,.m Rr i I ' � fM II w�1 0y Qii Ay Cc y . J00 Yg Y TLEO 0, • j�� ••EM OAL K G ` e ,� I' _ � n 1 COA Qw .t :IY .--r_ ��J{ ENTRY PAHWOx • 1 A" R • t LANDSCAPED PLANTER fiTPJ O' j I,..; h - PAVED PLAZA are I. P• I I I I a ry$ "®„�'I 1-9-0 DECORAATI,£TAL D, c8i 1 h "'-r-- r ry7f-- I- ' . 1 t PdY.D DRIYEJIdT ' 1 P1IEGRAIED iO PLALi V • TO REMAIN �w .'' s. ii SITE PLAN EXISTING RETAI I ',' fi LL ■�� T 0 � SCALE I..70'.0' i l i ._. 3 20 Im ]0 S I.,.U Z YN . F. 1.-t..:: rd Q amp ,„ •,.---•••• ••,,,,:iii .1 ,_ ..,.,,_._ I tiro .Him I PAM PARC PLAZA N � _ — SSE PLAN SET 14 UMEN1 C 1 .._.i _I �� I • PERGOLARENTON ME • PROPOSAL FOR OFF SITE DEVELOPMENT RESPONSIBILITY OF CITY OF RENTON • (OUTSIDE SUBJECT PROPERTY UNE) Q A1.1 _ _ 97013 BUILDING 'C' i BUILDING 'B' ti BUILDING 'A' • —AA__ -aim ^— -e�-93'.3• I I ® P 1=1 FP PTH TOP ao.wIE m r • =EN TI VA-II 1 I I I l I I I r ® _,C-]V4' ■.I m M P oP cP ac coR Q ::=�:r�� t—H ® PLAZA 2 �� oL.pTJ,7 � .., o s17 ti,,.I W' —h bB•.m vB' '' ,..8. 9 ��—REMI gi EDER BEER DEED T -• I�}I BP:PT BLAB 7-1—i— _ r J KMo WIiA E 0 •,—,J U _�- • • ra.sLAs 1 ( lErrrnANCE f h 47'-s' F VARF3.(JaME m.lLAB 4T REPOS./ Z SOUTHWEST ELEVATION o a CITY OF SEATTLE PIPELINE RO.W. o ri y SCALE:TAW•I'-0. E. m e Me 321 rz 04 l Z a 124 Q BUILDING 'A' BUILDING 'A' • /�Im3-B —tiI—M(NEIT ELEV4110H O ITAiRiflEV,igtER / \ 6PA,rET � 3 taE rz ruz AuawaLE w=rrr g TBP60.A2 \ Q°6MiE To 2 b �/,,,}_ I III_ _Il. II i�_ / \ Y*oP 6VNE0.00R .F{ r+`i:, �SI�IM ?I �!.'•Iv- ® ��lB'-3 V4• •• < '"'�",I " „ Y TOP 6 B�iL00R U 1N. N O 1 ® ® ?'® Q!! .I1ti1® ® ® ® 6B'•0 l/B' N — Y*oP6lGeRmt _ _ _ ��11111 __ °'x ®®® �am -� ®® ®®�.®B BBmCQ®® E®.%.® EEL —$ � `" Z- t-rm 51 B' I — �o P.,a_,,! -I---I — I.-,--T• .I—-r----,-,1 T---�I I-T-I l - m 6 PT 11.1 c a 3 _ 43'-3 1,MK14£52 V V O v' —--r—\-i EXIITING GGACE "a�" l 2 fW 4P BLAB.1255013TI6L T4.l&A9.FEBOENTI TWW PI u ae.TWAT SOUTHEAST ELEVATION - EAST ELEVATION MAIN ENTRANCE LOGAN STREET - SfrE PLAN SET SCALE:Inb'.I'-0. ate' OCT 5 v3i SCALE:I/I6'.I'-0' m e® ® RENTON MF • 0 B' b' 32• E A5_.1 97013 • BUILDING 'C' Z . • 0 F 6 PAgEi O n HE B ® 1 l a® EQ B m, �R m. BE 9 ER ®®_1:_Ed ®®_t� oe cs ernoOa o • -4-cPortacae '• i I. TD.SLAB a . F z - WEST ELEVATION z MORRIS STREET PI C) SCALE:I/16'•I'-0. 0 0 e • �� VI • E. O E—I a za a W , d BUILDING 'A' i' BUILDING 'B' n-q BUILDING 'C' E R 93.3' 83,65 --` /----' - 8 T. PO Er -. r uv FI:P !CP PI 7� II PP�1 �,�1 !!f M I!! I,! f JI Rm rp I!� RH �! 6 Mi,� fNs�. II en3;- ��1�c �T }C1v ei�g 135tvE �5w ��iil- -�"-�7*wmvB� �I 9� �� ®® ®® ®® ®FI-�r ®® ®® ®® ®® 6, P „U op. FFR_ .FRFR FRFR :::: :::: ®® ®: _:: :: :� : :� �: a F' t! =4•�a: J�/= -:4'{�, of! El }R.Y -1.7. Y � Sw o.PT SLAB s 4<, Sum s / FMISR GRADE!PEP) n rx11 DOOR TO.SLA B Y ' ' SITE PLAN SET NORTH ELEVATION • u E OCT.4 SW • ALLEY RENTON MF . SCALE:I/16'•1'-0' v (A'C.2_ m 0 1®• J 97013 C , N001300.0 103E1' / ru' \ I - I O / - o l n l n '' a o n n I / o / a 1 . / ^ IIrn • N n4 Im n-0 ii / >^ �/ / ne .� 2° . / YJ / / n, 9 / /. / r // ^,. of ��\\�� . / / 04 " I / 5 C I It m , � 1— f / g" 1 / • : "s 3 nn / s D // "a gn \�\\�aIx I^ " Z // n n4 ^- lz / 9 y'°'- d o , 5^ m na / S '''\. N �k y of n °° / ur gn a0ore Emw / n: iS \ Bn of / o,. ^„ en : I� gn nc ^r xn 3n na I / /r ii/ '' mn / / a� o' yn n.So I I / a, Cn / / // n n C \\ / 6.91'/ N'00'03 0 1 Ian/ b.. n� 6'n un ( /inar' yrik404\ 1 4 / /_ /:. li _:......_... n, 41'n n, AL4 _ " I -" � . m .� � i, irp „ s I I m -------- �-- - - R:21 . - w-50d03'20 22059' is.. L J —... �;9145\9nt97013'Ptd>2-1 43.15-1907 1253:4'Wers2',JHL m g KTH DATE BY DESCRPTIN Architects RENTON 100 tl N 2 ,` 13400 N^rihp way East,Sute 30 APARTMENTS• E N rn Berns,washngtm 96005 u 'n I D (425)401-6928 *Fan(425)401-0630 .. ..•,—,�... f•Y I o F SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION f' o p N891515'E 1183' , E m� 9a P jr...,,, Is'. N89'IS'15'E 5d or • - Exit — Z. C• y SE9'S6'dE IL,+o, r m Trash - - - - cc e. I ye e L Trash a- cc n 21 10 11 e e ,' ec76 c c e vc _ _ ti s Elev Lobby c 3 Z c • 7 / _ c �% c c c c c c c c �/ O (n ❑. »c %"l 4 l If 1. n1 me u. 3 CC) j n w,ro e+ m v m » 51 •v v v v m m c 1 z s --- c Elev. % , . % /, , _ ,,,, 4--(,..we/ ---_,T, cp 7stor 1---I O Storage \ a c rn E. 7 �' 3 n RETAIL Z w nc >I h a Q O I •oc b c 3e E. 1 f 7 )) / 3: ii, Q Z 114 �'lh / L 1e O W e c J ^) NT1.5e ; » is `STORM9. "n SEWER .J3,/5,�� n n e) .1S. JJJJ� c3•• CONNECT70N \ c 3 !%/////// a If L li a a Cl Ty OF Parkir.Ent.i\` :c � ' 6` 6•SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION SEA TT�F WAEyi, `� <i j/ © N R g UTILITY PLAN fLlN , :, o� / a: i�,_��. ,, W GARAGE LEVEL e •0 W .- '�' tt �.�,�• `: ==s' \CSr-, WATERLINE CONNECTION(6'?) 0*1C OCT.15.1997 RENTON MF CIriI STORM SEWER CONNECTION A: 97013 • DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. DO JOB/97095 Q. [n]ass-.en »cra..aeooTIL! • ‘ ./., • 41 / COSTING CMAMERCML/ ///TO REMAIN /7I ' SECONDARY• RY i 9 F GARAGE ONDRY / I. rfl ZAT • �d�/ I 1v(f4/ VS.(41 d w(w Iw)— , !'—w a l A.-alai..Iw, ,,n�f,r ,��r+,ft,l _ a 1 =ryll9' IYA.9 I Ip I , I^-�— II PROPOSED MIXED USE BUILDING _• D •Artx (n,,,tr 41,6 3 _ 0 ,4 - �` — DEVELOPMENT BY DALLY HOMES ,,,,�N,�„q 4•s „�o _ • ONSIDE aS,Em PROPERTY LINO MAIN RETAR h�= �rN / I EN*R. 0 I AtAci nita4IG mg(' -171 a Lu in— ryAYA•Y KFeit O 0.' ..tj_-,..—... I .--y `4�F1 w t/7 ..... __,.,„,..„.... . ‘11 . IP / / 7.0 ! ........... . i, C /r7 , ,.. ..........,„ . _...,,,,, ...- • . / 1 - .. <>1 .• • , . • //ice , , / / % i - -- I /,,,,, ,/,,,, //•j/i , n..nun•L \ Q. /,////,"/:j/4. i , /T e . , • • // // / /• a — �003:03 0M eI�L L w R .R'AA'[D ID AAM V f/1 /- / mama RETAIL// Y u... ...../.'/ //� i��TO REMAIN /// :' ▪ // / ?/ / / .. . / • . ,... .. • / -N1.E PUK.I.AM • - 0:.;r :// , / / / / / / / . .. — •' . ' I as,��N® • RSA RENTON MF • PROPOSAL FOR OFT RITE DEVELOPMENT — RESPONeIBIUTY OF CITY Of RENTON (OUTRIDE RUBECT PROPERTY UNO , ,L-1 • • L.P.D.IL MIAw A..d.U. • ma.+a,••... �uI+.N MG ........vas uuaN.. Irlmrw 4 '�SY A UNIT 61Pc:4944k,, f.w'h1y.,t -�-'� ram, ,11----!__....Z'‘'.. ;,'•.,,{' /, "'' V.... i►,'°"-"s, '111r pi,, NIT I- ��! l►a p /S•`• -r / :: I.. •F," v.q� AIM I k1ft1 :.5w, riti,;,4 limo,I.,- !il_ 11• f .. .. — --, / s4......g. 1 •- ,i.r.--4.;±-• --1 ki-,---t;tit rising •.. / . UNIT B1 �� n*, m; 14-1..ft ii��'�� ----- - ;:;C4 f . - i . 'r UNIT B1 a` -- (i 11`�17—P------------- ,I a a _ 11.`4' �'47:= ��— 71' w"Tn'f'44,0, ill- • UNIT B1 e�ego : ,•/ /a;�;;L.Qoav ►�'iyr�i re,{Y( Au e ragcfn l w .�, T ,41''IN4., y�71144"111UNIT B1 / :#4*-'0.1....7. rtwm,„Ari. /IA t.,..--F,....4,...t,„,i4y, .. 4.0 illvyr,s,* /10-1111111_ '' Z n 0, 4 e, ,.4 A., , Apw:14P . A '44, •,- vIlla r 1- t .), y.—. , —6 ,� . ki///,/IR O <8.11.6-109604.0-44,,t.n jl =.: ��,;• "fit-p_--"` R! al it a•. y�_.�ir�y�-- / T/, ,„� ,,,{{{��'9,toto ~^ I,`431 - ; I`l� P `&N,, w i 1 •::•1 • - •�.•13Pri,*- :� v,. (j �T' �1 �I�+wll1\ — ..----— --..-.-_ ,t . / �� A!.2,411 w , UNIT D ' ------ -----xe4cd-ia'- -- --- -- tiolipe4.11 Atts, ;,:„..tootteip_i , ivz,p-/ . /j 1, `� �, �" . to-,e-stzsOakii Item . itirr, ,/,-k%Tiff•////61/0-V)4461134. IteW , - .1r. 11 (/(J(I�1/Ml•/ ��j �c�..�. a ¢ R c 1 ///��/elm. LEASE _ .ra►:hs141 =• - . �`V-U41t7=0FY'/ �/1 +.N Nd urFtiv a_-- .._._ .. .. RENTON 4F yArA-14. _. Mt = j'A @T ANAGE• —= L ... .w " COMP ---._.__...—.--. last\II.tM\.N...rl•M i f II ii .,I. 66 ' 1. 61. plc' 6. `, plc' B •�, UNIT Al UNIT Al UNIT-Al , nG, . • U B3 UNl o UNIT A2 • UNIT A2 -• •�► • puis .. , _ . .z4g.: . 1, : •_.--,_-tt,. I ,_ _• ...b . • • ,, -.., .. ., .„_, • .. .,.• , I Ant • ii a",•�� I .\'i�'.i:;l.• •••• ,•l .!tea, i. . �,h'%.�'�, ."'ice _—PLANTING DETAIL H •.. •J`,yI• '. •:%f' ,�. ' .. r�.r� ��,Il J, • •X• N DDECIDUOUSPWN'[ - .B • •,••�• .. I'•!• ••�.'. . I4.(Dl `pi imrs' remit alim/r�"• I I s/oP s /� �, qj S • �� i•• • .. islr�� ,��(� ill �� B1 • .. ��' :% ' �/'>r'�`p UNIT A a . UNIT✓ UNIT A' UNIT A N•T. 61 'l '' %•,/. ;IA: 71 i �t..� a • MI a.: y I �51 ''�►y`�j* UNIT-A �L:;, o a.�• .-.. I �_� _ ins— .�• • ,,��T,•..r i.dittNo It i J f) • • _-J �Y- �iill� �. ii.�:�$�. i1�11 f• pv ii �,t l 3. /� ;/., 'CONIFER PLANTING DETAIL Ir M1'�'1^- ��•!• �I� ir• f-- rVi� I / l:/ sAv /� . I • ', �:.. UNIT D o:,.•1� ;r_ '1 11 ,y. E-i � ,b',o =.1,fili itp-o��)�k I'.ifre•• _...: 411,. i��,_,„li UNIT �A Z 1 ( S�fj/� :i� ` ��f'K7�:_._w:l�bso ii_°IVbo�;�i � 'r Y�'). 011111111 .• 1 . •,.,., , r�"3. f �.' 1 ,.� '�� IjM�• '!7 '1�Prtl�i�eFa' p •x .j�- :; r 'n fti• r ' ?4> ..w� � j � �1t ` J �� 1�. �l�.-rL. f j i)JY�j(,• . �I- 1.=,:1..� �� /u r4 j:�,,'ffl / •f.�u„ 4�l ry• %.'4,5/ ' .�' „ • l,t •R.0 f1:mi;trr/�a./?;rrt�r •• io1! 1 I -=• •�1 j,t SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL \ lij= p/r di /iiit�i j!.iti J Y. O•• g ,7 , • '' ^R gis fir/ 1. �' '1 �'�../ •,I / ( .'t_J• 7 �"`' . - : UNIT C e o 4 �•�•.v,.. ��—�� 7L.UNIT C : ' -*�---^' IV i.- 1[,�E i`(r I-#.42 97 j t 1�T1 V, (>r(1e.t, 6ealt7�i fl Ream GROUND COVER PWNTING DETAIL , .� y Ip` .:+ 3 In'. ritiv ;.._. 'L-3. y sir+-P,lb•1_� .._..•.--.: w.....�._o.�a ...+ eroa 4 ��' CITE )F RENTON ..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator f December 1, 1997 Mr. Charlie Laboda Daily Homes, Inc. 3316 Fuhrman Avenue East,#100 Seattle, WA 98102 SUBJECT:- Renton 100 Apartments Project No. LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Laboda: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced • project. No appeals Were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. 2 _ `. . As you are aware, a Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on December 9, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Site Plan Approval. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. . If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425)235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, • 9j6/\ Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Ms. Beverly Blackwell Ms.Jennifer Jorgenson . FINAL.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South = Renton, Washington 98055 • •• V 0 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • • • •• CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION ........... ....... ............. ... • AFFIDAVITOFSERVICEBYIVIAILINGs:mummimimimmemimgiiimimgiimi.iiiiiiiiiiii. On the 19.11 day of ON Veli9e,if , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a segled envelope containing • pekerm inaki ens' • documents. This information was sent to: • Name Representing Department of Ecology • Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries • David F.Dietzman Department of Natural Resources • Shirley Lukhang • Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe • Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Rita Perstac Puget Power a • • (Signature of Sender) 94/11414) rni#1114 14.1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free andluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 1)°- g) /qq) c_/yvy--)djaa., Notary Publiein and for the State of Washington MARILYN KAMCHEFF Notary(Print) • My appointment ex$1611111115810N eXPIKES 0/29199 , •. • , ProjVAcrilei: leo Avivi-lyne Project Number: LMACI1 166 5A-14-ecc NOTARY.DOC. • • .v IT OFREN TON z:- • - ;Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 13, 1997 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject:Environmental Determinations • Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on November 12,1997. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA,ECF The applicant, Daily Homes,seeks approval of a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S(approx.4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls),and 110 multi-family residential units op the three upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial'space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet,with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. Location: 255 Logan Avenue South. -'. `:. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 1,1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably • available at the time of the determination may submit Written comments.After review of the comments,if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with:.Jana Huerter,Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 980552•If an appeal Of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellantlperson requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the • • environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before.5:00 PM December 1,1997. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information • regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501,-.- 4 If you have questions,please call me at(425)235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen • Project Manager • cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro . - Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources • Don Hurter, Department of Transportation ': Shirley Lukhang,Seattle Public Utilities • Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) ' Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYL7R.DOC1 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Renton 100 Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S (approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels (93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx.50 feet,with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 255 Logan Avenue South LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 1, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 1,1997. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501. PUBLICATION DATE: November 17,1997 DATE OF DECISION: November 12, 1997 SIGNATURES: 14eqq elsi(trato'rl�i:CU/1 // /2 GreggZirman DATE DepartmeWf PI ning/Building/Public Works Sam Chastain,Administrator DATE /, Community Service Department Al a�r�--72 fC 11` i Lee heeler, Fire Chief DATE ' Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC CITY OF RENTON . . DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Renton 100 Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks approval of a proposal for a four"story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S (approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage (145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels (93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet, with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade.,,- LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 255 Logan Avenue South MITIGATION MEASURES: .: 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee,equal to$388 per multi-family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building: The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated to be$45,077.20. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip • associated with the project. The,traffic mitigation fee is estimated to be$39,862.50. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 5. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. Up to 33% of the required Parks impact fee may be met by providing on-site recreation .. amenities. The required mitigation fee shall be subject to the approval of the Parks Department and the Development Services Division, and the fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF • APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. . PROJECT NAME: Renton 100 Apartments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks approval of a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S (approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage (145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels (93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet, with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. . LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 255 Logan Avenue South - • Advisory Notes to Applicant ;: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are . not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1. Tenant storage is not allowed in the parking garage. • FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 3,750 gpm. Four fire hydrants are.required. One fire hydrant is • required within 150 feet of the proposed structure and three fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required. The City water main system in the street would satisfy the looped main requirement. • 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout all structures. • 3. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout all structures. 4. An approved dry standpipe system is required to be installed throughout the structure., PLAN REVIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS Water-There is an existing 12-inch diameter water line in S.3rd Street. The water lines in Morris, Second and Logan vary in sizes from 4 to 6-inch in diameter. The water lines are being replaced with ' larger diameter mains (12-inch)to meet the required fire flow by the City of Renton Water Utility during . the 1998 spring construction season,with appropriate spacing of new fire hydrants in'coordination with the Daily project. Sewer-There is anV existing 12-inch diameter sanitary sewer on the north side of the proposed project and in Logan Avenue. An 8-inch diameter sewer line serves the parcels to the south of the pipeline right- ., of-way. . . . . Storm -There are existing 12-inch diameter storm drain lines in the rights-of-way surrounding the site, • as well as in the Seattle Pipeline property.'A preliminary storm water report with calculations determining whether water facilities or detention is required was received with the application. _ ' - - _ • - Renton 100 Apartments - - - - - - Advisory Notes (Continued) Page 2 of 2 . • • Streets-The adjacent streets are fully improved with sidewalks, curb and gutter, paving and street lighting. Logan will be upgraded in conjunction with the Piazza improvements in the 1998 construction season. CODE REQUIREMENTS Water 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.113 per square foot of property. The fee for 54,310 square feet is$6,137.03. Sanitary Sewer 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.078 per square foot of property. , The fee for 54,310 square feet is$4,236.18. Surface Water 1. The System Development Charge is not triggered by this development as no additional impervious surface is created. Plan Review-General s'.` • 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards 2. A construction permit is required:When, plans are complete three'.copies of the drawings,two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to • the fourth floor counter. :A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by;the permit system prior to issuing a check. POLICE-104 Police Calls for'ServiceEstimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE ,. • Theft from construction sites is one of the-moat common"reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private:property„Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in - use, and should also have a heavy-duty"deadbolt:installed with,no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter:resistant:;- ;,:41- I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing"signs on the property while it's-- . under construction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if • • suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED COMPLEX Coded access as entry to each building is recommended to prevent trespassing of individuals Who have no right to be on the property. Each unit should have solid core,doors, preferably metal.or metal over • solid wood with peep holes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2" in length when extended and installed with 3"wood screws. ' Sliding windows, including the glass patio doors,will need additional locks;these locks will need to •. secure the windows from being pried out of the frames vertically. .This means the locks will need to be placed into the top.or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. • ,:Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. The stairways at the complex should be constructed of• lattice or metal railing so visibility is possible through the stairway. There should not be any solid walls in any stairway that‘would serve to limit the visibility up and down the stairs and provide a place for a criminal to hidewhile waiting,for a homeowner to return-home. In additional,the balcony walls also need to be made of either metal or wood lattice or:railing ,no,solid walls for the same purpose. : Renton 100 Apartments artments - - LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF ,;:, • Advisory Notes(Continued) • Page 3 of 3 ; • Extra security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the sidewalks, in the stairways, and alleyway. Each unit should have their individual unit numbers listed clearly,with the number at least 6" in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and placed under a light.,This will aid • police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit they need to go to. Landscaping around the exterior and interior of the plaza should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a unit. • Parking garages are targeted frequently by criminals,so it's important to have any entrance into the parking garage be a monitored security entrance. Either a security guard or coded entrance to this part.. of the building is recommended. 'Strong lighting is also needed in this type of enclosure to keep tenants safe while they're walking to and from their vehicle. Since part of this building will be a shopping center, it's extremely important to keep the living entrances and shop entrances separate from one another. Having a public and private building mixed together could encourage loitering and it could make it difficult to ascertain who belongs on the premises and who does not after hours. All individual shops should adhere to the same structural recommendations as mentioned above for the apartment units(i.e., solid core entrance doors, locking devices, peepholes, etc.) Each back door to each business will need auxiliary locking devices, in addition to heavy-duty . deadbolt locks(such as latch guard and pry-resistant cylinderswaround the locks). Each business needs a security alarm system. Access to the back of the buildings should be limited, preferably with security fencing. After the businesses have closed,`this area could become dangerous due to the lack of natural surveillance by business merchants or tenants.'` AIRPORT Tenants should be notified of the proximityof the Renton Airport. Failure to do otherwise may result in - increased workload to airport staff as a result of complaints from tenants. ' The proposed 100-unit apartment complex is located just east of the extended centerline of the Renton Airport. It is significant to note that a majority of aircraft turn east.over or in the near vicinity of the proposed complex at very lowaltitude;,.This area, prior to"approval of the.'complex, should be declared compatible with the operation of the airport and the flight at very low altitudes by aircraft 7 days a week and 24-hours per day, in the City's Comprehensive Plan..: ":• . • • 5 , • • • NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA,ECF Environmental review for a four story mixed-use building in downtown Renton. Location: 255 Logan Avenue So. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on December 1, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on December 9, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed site plan approval. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: November 17, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION a ' PROJECT NAME: RENTON 100 APARTMENTS r PROJECT NUMBER: LUA•97-155,SA•H,ECF The applicant,Daily Homes,seeks approval of a proposal for a four story,mixed-use building In downtovei y Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S(approx.4,810 s.f.),a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls).and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The `i residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space Is broken into three attached • building wings oriented around two landscaped courts.The average height of the building at parapets is approx. ' •• 50 feet,with the highest point of the building about 81 feet above grade.Location:255 Logan Avenue South. • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED . THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT(ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 6:00 PM December 1, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee Is based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in Judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.Alter review of the comments.If Environmental Review Committee finds them Is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there ' • will no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal I appeal within the original 15-day Bmeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter,Land Use Review Supervisor.City of Renton Development Services Division,200 MITI Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination Is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period,then • the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal Is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request.The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental • Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner In writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal.Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 6:00 PM December 1,1997.Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00'application fee with:Hearing Examiner.City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting In the Council Chambers on the 1 second floor of City Hall.Renton,Washington,on December 9.1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Site Plan • • . Approval. The applicant or representative(s)of the applicant Is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of • • the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination Is appealed.the • appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. rj MI MI MN saga ==a! �^Fw _mt,� _ ico —•— - ,_9\nd�. i E 11 _� !! lib -imp __,t. ,-.:-.1 _.- "iar _L — Ica iii SIi� iiiit� „-■ t6Tr ii i >a.a. r.�� . r., -. 112--- 1 . , . . 1 • I I. Ade li 11111 al Iii i_7_.—Istirosn 1 .--I ' ' 1. e15 ( . ... . ' FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,•PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please'include the project NUMBER whop calling for proper.'file1dentificatiori:',"':;,'"' ' CERTIFICATION i, /L4j.1-Tr /"/IAleJ t i 1 . , hereby certify that G copies of the above document were posted by me i 6 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on • NovEn e12 J � ( 7I 7 •• Signed: : j� e. ./MT,7 . STATE OF WASHINGTON . ) • ) SS • COUNTY OF KING • ) - 'I certify,"that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that I(Yl A-0- :ir) r C t s, signed this'instrument and acknowledged it to be_ his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses - an.d purposes mentioned in the instrument. • Notary Publi in and for the Stale Washington Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHFFF • My appointmentM sejoO t FXplREs 6f2erep No(Art y.c:'c , . • , . , .1'4 0 1-1 fi:::;E . . . . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: RENTON 100 APARTMENTS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks approval of a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown ' Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S(approx.4,610 s.f.);a ground floor parking garage (145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels (93,398 s.f.). The . residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet,.with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. Location: 255 Logan Avenue South. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED • THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE . ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 1, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the,Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment,period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. Appeals of the environmental determination must I be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 1,1997. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the • appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on December 9. 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Site Plan Approval. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to,be present at the public hearing. A copy of . the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. ✓• MOON HIGH SCHOOL it, TO 0 ImAi E Mali 1 =IMP ME- 1 ,00 E ram. .-•IN I ■a■ • B , S s II c.� �a sG, =mow r i Iir 1 ', � ,� � , --si - • MN 11 1 I. IIS111 ICI :II II' � 1 . .. Mr --g — WI ro alai Jff — 5ans- — ' -- . -- F. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT • . SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION , ::::;al.N aSICI .1410.#b010t eai<::NU.MBER>. h0ri.a I�.... . ...:w..::.......: :�...4.1 <.:0.0 :ra ,e.rfia:;>'danflfia4tlonr>_:<:::::<<::::.<_:::; STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE November 12, 1997 Project Name Renton 100 Apartments Applicant Daily Homes, Inc. File Number LUA-97-155, SA-H, ECF Project Manager Peter Rosen Project Description The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks approval of a proposed 4 story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Avenue S. (approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage (145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the 3 upper levels (93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into 3 attached building wings oriented around 2 landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approximately 50 feet, with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. The main entrance to the parking garage (intended for residents) would be from the Seattle Pipeline right-of-way accessed off Logan Ave. S. or Morris Ave. S. A secondary entrance is proposed from the alley at the northwest corner of the building. There is a street-level pedestrian entry to a lobby and the residential portion of the building at the southeast corner of the property on Logan Ave. S. The commercial space may be divided into individual leasable spaces with separate entrances from Logan Avenue S. Project Location 255 Logan Avenue S., City block between Logan Avenue S. and Morris Avenue S. and between S. 3rd Street and S. 2nd Street Exist. Bldg. Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf 93,398 s.f. residential 4,610 s.f. commercial 44,252 s.f. garage area Site Area 53,962 s.f. Total Building Area gsf 144,913 s.f. total floor area RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated. = 14 RENTON HIGH SCHOOL = Elk I s 400 T� } C Ikral . s L.L urri.:Lgigara A • lib III bib 11111111 ION Mil :III La s. -� Project Location Map E r1�1 r—ir'-Xr"--u---S!}--�s25 r�r—• -..c-r.. rr-�-� City of Renton P/B/PW Department Env.__..rental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF NOVEMBER 12, 1997 • Page 2 of 9 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to$388 per multi-family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $45,077.20. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated to be$39,862.50. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 5. The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. Up to 33% of the required Parks impact fee may be met by providing on-site recreation amenities. The required mitigation fee shall be subject to the approval of the Parks Department and the Development Services . Division, and the fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Departmen Env Tient&Review Committee Staff Report RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155, SA-H,ECF REPORT OF NOVEMBER 12, 1997 Page 3 of 9 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1. Tenant storage is not allowed in the parking garage. FIRE 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 3,750 gpm. Four fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed structure and three fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. A looped water main is required. The City water main system in the street would satisfy the looped main requirement. 2. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout all structures. 3. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout all structures. 4. An approved dry standpipe system is required to be installed throughout the structure. PLAN REVIEW EXISTING CONDITIONS Water-There is an existing 12-inch diameter water line in S. 3rd Street. The water lines in Morris, Second and Logan vary in sizes from 4 to 6-inch in diameter. The water lines are being replaced with larger diameter mains (12- inch)to meet the required fire flow by the City of Renton Water Utility during the 1998 spring construction season, with appropriate spacing of new fire hydrants in coordination with the Daily project. Sewer-There is an existing 12-inch diameter sanitary sewer on the north side of the proposed project and in Logan Avenue. An 8-inch diameter sewer line serves the parcels to the south of the pipeline right-of-way. Storm -There are existing 12-inch diameter storm drain lines in the rights-of-way surrounding the site, as well as in the Seattle Pipeline property. A preliminary storm water report with calculations determining whether water quality facilities or detention is required was received with the application. Streets -The adjacent streets are fully improved with sidewalks, curb and gutter, paving and street lighting. Logan will be upgraded in conjunction with the Piazza improvements in the 1998 construction season. CODE REQUIREMENTS Water 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.113 per square foot of property. The fee for 54,310 square feet is$6,137.03. Sanitary Sewer 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$0.078 per square foot of property. The fee for 54,310 square feet is$4,236.18. Surface Water 1. The System Development Charge is not triggered by this development as no additional impervious surface is created. Plan Review-General 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department ' Env,,..,,,aental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF NOVEMBER 12, 1997 Page 4 of9 POLICE -104 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing"signs on the property while it's under construction (flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED COMPLEX Coded access as entry to each building is recommended to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property. Each unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood with peep holes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2" in length when extended and installed with 3" wood screws. Sliding windows, including the glass patio doors,will need additional locks;these locks will need to secure the windows from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. The stairways at the complex should be constructed of lattice or metal railing so visibility is possible through the stairway. There should not be any solid walls in any stairway that would serve to limit the visibility up and down the stairs and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a homeowner to return home. In additional, the balcony walls also need to be made of either metal or wood lattice or railing- no solid walls for the same purpose. Extra security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the sidewalks, in the stairways, and alleyway. Each unit should have their individual unit numbers listed clearly,with the number at least 6" in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and placed under a light. This will aid police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit they need to go to. Landscaping around the exterior and interior of the plaza should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a unit. Parking garages are targeted frequently by criminals, so it's important to have any entrance into the parking garage be a monitored security entrance. Either a security guard or coded entrance to this part of the building is recommended. Strong lighting is also needed in this type of enclosure to keep tenants safe while they're walking to and from their vehicle. Since part of this building will be a shopping center, it's extremely important to keep the living entrances and shop entrances separate from one another. Having a public and private building mixed together could encourage loitering and it could make it difficult to ascertain who belongs on the premises and who does not after hours. All individual shops should adhere to the same structural recommendations as mentioned above for the apartment units (i.e., solid core entrance doors, locking devices, peepholes, etc.) Each back door to each business will need auxiliary locking devices, in addition to heavy-duty deadbolt locks (such as latch guard and pry-resistant cylinders around the locks). Each business needs a security alarm system. Access to the back of the buildings should be limited, preferably with security fencing. After the businesses have closed, this area could become dangerous due to the lack of natural surveillance by business merchants or tenants. AIRPORT Tenants should be notified of the proximity of the Renton Airport. Failure to do otherwise may result in increased workload to airport staff as a result of complaints from tenants. The proposed 100-unit apartment complex is located just east of the extended centerline of the Renton Airport. It is significant to note that a majority of aircraft turn east over or in the near vicinity of the proposed complex at very low altitude. This area, prior to approval of the complex, should be declared compatible with the operation of the airport and the flight at very low altitudes by aircraft 7 days a week and 24-hours per day, in the City's Comprehensive Plan. ERCRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Env rental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF NOVEMBER 12, 1997 Page 5 of9 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The subject site is relatively flat,with an apparent slight grade down toward the south. The site is presently covered with asphalt, concrete and gravel. The proposed development would consist of 3 floors of apartment units over a main floor occupied by a parking garage and retail space. The main floor would be close to the existing site grades, with no basement planned. A geotechnical study was prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc. Soil boring tests encountered loose fill and alluvial soils overlying dense, gravely sands. The loose soils are compressible and are potentially liquefiable below the water table. The report recommends that the building be supported on deep foundations embedded into the dense sands rather than a conventional foundation because of the potential of unacceptable foundation settlement. The report recommends augercast piers as the most suitable deep foundation option. On-grade slabs can be used if some differential settlement is allowable on the lowest floor which will be used primarily for parking. The near-surface loose soils do not provide a good subgrade support for pavement and the report recommends importing utility backfill and structural fill for proper compaction. It is estimated that approximately 2,200 cubic yards of structural fill would be imported to the site. The site would be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, and organic soil for construction of paved and building areas. Potential erosion impacts that could occur during site preparation and construction would be mitigated by City Code requirements for a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) and a Construction Mitigation Plan. Staff recommends a mitigation measure to ensure that temporary erosion controls are implemented throughout the duration of construction of the project. Mitigation Measures: Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. Nexus: Environmental Ordinance. 2. Air Impacts: Impacts to air quality can be anticipated during construction and after occupancy of the proposed project. Impacts during construction would include increased levels of airborne particulates (especially dust) from disturbance of exposed soils. Construction impacts would be short term in nature and would be mitigated through best management practices of the required TESCP and with the Construction Mitigation Plan. Emissions from construction equipment exhaust would have a minor impact on local air quality. Exhaust from construction vehicles is regulated by State and City Codes. After construction,the impacts would be associated primarily with vehicle exhaust from residential traffic. Vehicle emissions are regulated by the State of Washington. Overall air impacts related to the proposed project would be relatively minor in nature and are not considered significant to warrant special mitigation measures. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus NA 3. Water Impacts: There are no surface water bodies or wetlands on the site or in the immediate vicinity of the site. The project site is not located within the 100-year floodplain. The site is presently covered with impervious surfaces, consisting of either asphalt or concrete paving and some small areas of compacted crushed rock surfacing. The proposed development would construct a building covering approximately 90% of the site area, replacing the existing impervious surfaces. The site currently discharges to City stormwater facilities. The project application includes a preliminary stormwater report that states there would be no significant change to hydrologic conditions of the site with construction of the proposed development. Therefore,the proposal may be exempt from on-site detention requirements and could maintain the existing connection to the City stormwater system without alteration. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Env rental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155, SA-H,ECF REPORT OF NOVEMBER 12, 1997 Page 6 of 9 The proposal would not add impervious area subject to vehicle use which would trigger water quality treatment requirements. The covered parking garage has floor drains connected directly to the sanitary sewer system. The stormwater facilities will be required to meet the standards of the King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City. Therefore, no additional mitigation measures are recommended. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA 4. Environmental Health/Noise Impacts: Development of the site would result in noise impacts. These impacts would be limited to the construction phase of the project, estimated to be have a total duration of approximately 12 months (April 1998 to April 1999). It is not anticipated that construction activities and noise generated would have a direct, significant impact on the use of surrounding properties. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which proposes limiting the hours of construction to between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. Monday through Friday. Construction equipment noise would be mitigated by muffling equipment as required per standard construction standards and other noxious characteristics would be controlled using best management construction practices. The noise impacts are not considered significant due to the limited duration of the construction period and the proposed mitigations restricting the hours of construction and minimizing equipment noise. After completion of the project,there would be noise impacts of increased traffic and impacts from activities normally associated with an introduced residential population. This is not considered to be a significant impact and the potential impacts of residential uses in downtown area were evaluated during the process of adopting the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation for the subject site. Future residents of the proposed project would be subjected to noise and activity normal to an urban center. The project site is,just east of the extended centerline of the Renton Airport. Aircraft fly at low altitudes over or in the near vicinity of the site. Noise from aircraft could impact future residents of the apartment proposal. The site is also adjacent to the Renton Transit Center and residents would be subject to bus noise and activity associated with the transit hub. The Comprehensive Plan and zoning envisions downtown Renton as an urban center with a variety of residential and commercial uses developed at a high-density, intensity level. The potential conflicts between uses and impacts of airport and transit noise were known factors with the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and zoning for downtown. The potential noise impacts on residents are not considered of a significant magnitude to warrant imposition of mitigation measures. Mitigation Measures:No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA 6. Land Use and Aesthetics Impacts: The subject site is located in the Center Downtown (CD) Comprehensive Plan map and Zoning designation. The proposal includes multi-family residential and commercial uses which are consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the uses permitted in the CD zoning designation. Potential impacts of residential uses in the downtown were evaluated during the process of adopting the Comprehensive Plan and implementing zoning. It is anticipated that the proposed residential and commercial uses would be compatible with existing, surrounding land uses and the future land use types envisioned under the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. The subject site is located outside 200 feet from a shoreline area and is therefore exempt from shoreline regulations. The average height of the proposed buildings at the parapets is 50 feet above the adjacent sidewalk. The maximum building height is 61 feet, at the stair/elevator tower at the southeast corner of the building. The highest building elevation would be 103 feet 8 inches above sea level,which meets the Airport zoning horizontal surface height limit of 179 feet above sea level. The buildings would cast shadows particularly to the north and east of the site. The shadows may shade portions of Logan Street S.to the north of the subject, particularly during the winter season. This potential impact is not considered to be a potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures:No mitigation measures are recommended. Policy Nexus: NA. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Env yenta/Review Committee Staff Report RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155, SA-H,ECF REPORT OF NOVEMBER 12, 1997 Page 7 of9 7. Recreation Impacts: The proposal would result in construction of 110 multi-family residential units: Future residents would make use of the existing and future City park and recreation facilities throughout the City. In order to mitigate the impact of the development on the City's parks and recreation facilities the City has adopted a mitigation fee of$354.51 per new multi-family dwelling unit. The Park's Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $38,996.10. The applicant states that on-site recreation amenities will be provided for tenants. Up to 33% of the required Parks impact fee may be met by providing on-site recreation amenities. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Park's Department mitigation fee of$354.51 per multi-family dwelling unit. Up to 33% of the required Parks impact fee may be met by providing on-site recreation amenities. The required mitigation fee shall be subject to the approval of the Parks Department and the Development Services Division, and the fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. Nexus: Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) 5. Transportation Impacts: The proposal includes a ground floor parking garage for the residential dwelling units. The main entrance to the parking garage would be from the Seattle Pipeline right-of-way accessed off Logan Avenue S. or Morris Avenue S. A secondary entrance to the garage is proposed from the alley at the northwest corner of the building, off Morris Avenue S. There is a street-level pedestrian entry for apartment residents at the southeast corner of the building on Logan Avenue S. The commercial portion of the building would be accessed from the entries along the frontage of Logan Avenue S. There are plans to upgrade Logan Street S. in conjunction with improvements for the Renton Piazza with the objective of enhancing pedestrian amenities. The right-of-way improvements will include wider sidewalks (10 to 12 feet wide), planters and street furniture. The proposed multi-family development would result in an increase in the number of traffic trips on the local street system. However,the amount of additional traffic that would be generated is not anticipated to result in a significant impact on the street system. A Traffic Mitigation Fee will be assessed based on the number of average daily trips that are attributed to the proposed development. The number of trips is based on standards from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. It has been estimated that the proposal would result in a net increase of 531.5 additional daily trips. The net increase in the number of traffic trips has been calculated including credit for the previous use on the site. The Transportation Mitigation Fee is calculated to be$75 per average daily trip. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated to be $39,862.50. The proposal includes a parking garage with 145 parking stalls to serve the 110 residential apartment units. There are also 50 parking stalls which will be improved off-site in the Seattle Pipeline right-of-way and these parking spaces would also be available to residents and guests. The subject site is located in the Downtown Core Area which specifically exempts development projects from on-site parking code requirements. The proposal would provide parking at a ratio of 1.31 spaces per dwelling unit, without consideration of the off-site parking spaces. The Parking Code requires 1.5 parking spaces per multi-family dwelling unit and then 1 guest parking space per 4 dwelling units which would equal a total of 193 spaces. The project site is located adjacent to the Renton Transit Center so it is likely that residents of the proposed project would utilize transit at a proportionately higher rate. It is anticipated that the proposal includes sufficient parking for residents and that the project would not result in off-site, overflow parking impacts. The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan which gives proposed hauling routes and states that construction hours would be limited to 7 a.m.to 6 p.m. Monday through Friday. Construction-related truck traffic could impact traffic flows if occurring during peak traffic flow periods. Staff recommends a mitigating measure to ensure that truck traffic is limited to off-peak hours. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75 for each average daily trip associated with the project. The traffic mitigation fee is estimated to be $39,862.50. This fee is payable prior to the issuance of building permits. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Env,: ;;nental Review Committee Staff Report RENTON 100 APARTMENTS LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF REPORT OF NOVEMBER 12, 1997 Page 8 of 9 4. Public Services Impacts: The proposed development would result in an increased demand for public services including fire and police protection, and schools. Police have estimated there would be 104 police calls for service annually that would result from the proposed development. According to the Comprehensive Plan,there are 0.33 school-age children generated per multi-family dwelling unit. Therefore,the proposal would add approximately 36 children to school district facilities. These impacts are not considered to be significant and cumulative impacts of projected residential growth on public facilities was considered with the environmental analysis conducted for adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal would add new construction to the City and would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee would apply to all new construction at a rate of$388 per multi-family unit, and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated to be a total of$45,077.20. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable at the time of issuance of Building Permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $388 per multi-family unit and $0.52 per square foot for the commercial area of the building. The Fire Mitigation Fee is estimated to be $45,077.20. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution and adopting ordinance, Environmental Review(SEPA) E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. ERCRPT.DOC • Renton Department of Planning/Building. _ tic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ilkete... COMMENTS DUE: 10/17/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 10/31/97 APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton 100 Apts. WORK ORDER NO: 78294 LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S., City block between Logan Ave S and Morris Ave S between S 3rd St. and S 2nd St. SITE AREA: 53,962 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 144,913 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S(approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet, with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Histodc/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet aza_ MAtp. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 2,/jA 'b 346ra 3 6/.yao �- r - a • r� ��,�. � �, ire�a�� Co �UU'l / m 7Q C— yY 7L7(-4c7.,) le/P1/)6?766—C—h—A.-C3P t." C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • fie— We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information is ne ed to properly assess this proposal. r) (. Si na ure of Director or Authorize Representative Date S� DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City`'v.'rlenton Department of Planning/Building/F.Works ENVIRONMEN,TAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Coy afticel COMMENTS DUE: 10/17/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 10/31/97 APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton 100 Apts. WORK ORDER NO: 78294 LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S., City block between Logan Ave S and Morris Ave S between S 3rd St. and S 2nd St. SITE AREA: 53,962 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 144,913 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S(approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet,with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LighVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ( / vL, ID Cr' 2`%-e. 1/rc� t"' �.�( (-t ��/� ( IA I p Ir r tA-7 r We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or uthorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: October 30, 1997 To: Peter Rosen 3 From: Kayren K. Kittrick, Plan Review Subject: Renton 100 Apartments LUA-997-155, SA-H, ECF EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER - There is an existing 12-inch diameter water line in S. 3rd Street. The water lines in Morris, Second and Logan vary in sizes from 4 to 6-inch in diameter. The water lines are being replaced with larger diameter mains (12-inch ) to meet the required fire flow by the City of Renton Water Utility during the 1998 spring construction season, with appropriate spacing of new fire hydrants in coordination with the Daily project. SEWER - There is an existing 12-inch diameter sanitary sewer on the north side of the proposed project and in Logan Avenue. An 8-inch diameter sewer line serves the parcels to the south of the pipeline right-of-way. STORM - There are existing 12-inch diameter storm drain lines in the rights-of-way surrounding the site, as well as in the Seattle Pipeline property. A preliminary storm water report with calculations determining whether water quality facilities or detention is required was received with the application. STREETS - The adjacent streets are fully improved with sidewalks, curb and gutter, paving and streetlighting. Logan will be upgraded in conjunction with the Piazza improvements in the 1998 construction season. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.113 per square foot of property. The fee for 54,310 square feet is $6,137.03. SANITARY SEWER 1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $0.078 per square foot of property. The fee for 54,310 square feet is $4,236.18. SURFACE WATER 1. The System Development Charge is not triggered by this development as no additional impervious surface is created. DALLYGF.DOC TRANSPORTATION • 1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee shall be assessed for the 531.5 additional daily trips to this site at a rate of $75.00 per trip. This fee has been calculated to be $39,862.50 including the credit for the previous use. PLAN REVIEW- GENERAL 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 2. A construction plan indicating haul route and hours, construction hours and a traffic control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to any permit being issued. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the Development Services Division. 3. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no Sunday construction. CC: Neil Watts DALLYGF.DOC • 'S-` Y O • 014. .r '..?:y«1von.x»cwwr.cw�.�wcwv:e+.w.of.�nxv..rw�l�rk :�tnr •' awocaa�i„w ".uwa»ccnwv�,o`wa:oaor+r..�.c»s Project Name Du Ill - 1Ztentoh 100 Apa✓tsvlcvi1S Project Address 255 Lori Ave_ S Contact Person Cha✓IIe bode( ) De(IIy I-HOw(es 1 IC.. Address 33/6 Fu tiv wtavt Ave. 6 ,, # !OO 1 Seale tjM °t I o 2 Phone Number (2°6) - 32B- 3770 • Permit Number L OA - 9 7 ` 155 Project Description f-ou✓ stool y�I x�c{ u h 1 - 6 ID s.f. Go vvl ue✓cia I) 110 apt 01)1,15 aJ 1 -15 toavh,K.cl signs , Site- avea 53g62 s.f Aid Rise A ,C223) Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: � +�' DgiIII raze ✓`' Jo�Iv ti,y D'Residential L�' ITE Trip Generation Manual tkewl @"Retail ❑ Traffic Study +� oyi► Rise C2zz) >u Cr peak 1.0 cwlP4yKo i ❑ Non-retail L Other y,62 tv�h0Ps u N,t • 1 PYed- 5-1114e5 : E> 511 A H�v � 57.22 P� SPcuk��}I Retail (Si )- y0.c7 tvips to-ell /0 Sales ac�t�e, ,etc. Calculation: I .4ss .c, 25c7o 'n4l (v7 .Nips. (s3' ( ) Ex15�I' Sitc �i35Go) `57.22) = 23. 6 o(ccllk Z'rlf1S Dcvelored SIlc : (iio)(4.62) + ( y61�°000)(40,67)(0.25) = 555.16r1 l tYIP I Res idoitIRI (-0�w/evelgl • Net tick) det111 tv1Ps : (555. I ) - (23. 6 ) = 531. 5 daIl� -tvipt At 475 .� tv,p : (531. 5)(75) _ 39, 862 . 50 - T _ Transportation Mitigation Fee: 3q, 86 . 50 Calculated by: Ak'd //a? Date: 10/20/q7 Account Number: Date of Payment • • ' : ,, PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVD._.. #97- ye.:7; ,E! S'E,J- , _ !p . DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET-. ❑ PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP - ` " ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST•REVIEW SHEET T ''❑ . ' ;OTHER APPLICANT: ' ,g C/. /4,,;l/.1•_-s. ,. • y . ' RECEIVED FROM X 8 2s1 :JOB ADDRESS:. . -'S': Z 40 4, /3c..lN�-�'!- • �i —S` . •.• . .WO# e . NATURE OF WORK: • ' /3/he '• 49ewnERC/,'L/R /DtM7At /�ti4ir GREEN# ' , ' 18 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED ' .. ,• NEED MORE INFORMATION: ❑ LEGAL DESCRIPTIO; ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION.FEES ESTIMATED • , - ,❑ . SQUARE FOOTAGE ' ' • 0 VICINITY MAP ' ' 0 NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES .',: . . • . '❑ FRONT FOOTAGE , • 0 OTHER . -- ' ❑ VESTED ' V - - ❑, NOT VESTED ' • - - - - '' • ' •❑ This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# 9?-t727•'dated - . I 7Z 0�77 . s69 6 pp.-.0o/Q'' ' , ❑' PARENT PID#(subject to change)_- , . SUBJECT PROPERTY PID#�-' h ff c//S 0 003� - ❑: King Co.Tax Acct#(new) ' . It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon . .development of the property.'All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site - 'and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering Mechanisms for'the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances _ and determined by the applicable Utility Section.- - • , - - - -Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. . '..`The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,-side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. - • . SPECIAL ASSESSMENT,:' - . DISTRICT PARCEL ,- METHOD OF '. ' . ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT - DISTRICTS ' . ' ' ^ ..... , " : • • -NO. `: . ,NO.' • 'ASSESSMENT : • UNITS OR'FEE .. Latecomer Agreement(Pit)WATER '- - , - - . - • -Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER ' . ." • , Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER '- • ' ' ' ' - - • Special Assessment District/WATER- , . . .' , . ' . Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER - • . . 7j _ Joint Use Agreement(METRO) ' • , • ' Local Improvement District'- - . , , • , , Traffic Benefit Zones - _ '- ' , $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION ' . FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER . . •• . V ••.; 'r-, #OF UNITS/ . SDC FEE • 0 Pd Prey. ., 0 .Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption)' Ii ' Never Pd .- ' '�• SQ.,FTG., • ' ' -:- , • • Single family residential$850/unit x - • - . .. -• -• , ' , . '. , Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park ,- . - Apartment, Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x . -. . • . ' - j Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq. ft. of property(not less than$850.00)x : ' , sy ;3 O - - *". (i / 3-7,-'0 3 -• • •Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg phis V15 ft perimeter p.,saa cent threshold) ' • SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER ' • - - .: - - - ` .'' . : ' ❑ Pd Prey. . . ❑ Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 'M.Never Pd•• ` ' • •' •' , . Single family residential dwelling unit$585/unit x • • ' - ', - . - - • . - • Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x• • • ' - • , • ' ' ' ' Apartment, Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x ' .. - ` - 'Commercial/Industrial,$0.078/sq. ft. of property'(not less than$585.00)x sY, 3/0 ,t' y 2 3 6,/g '• REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees - • SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER ' • . - ' ' ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) ER -Never Pd • ' • ' - '. ' • Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x. •' - , • ' All other properties$0.129/sq ft of new impervious area of property x ' (not less than$385.00) ' ' .•' . - .',.• , - -O • PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ /a, 3 7 3 •2/ - ' 8/i � - . , Signatuof fRRev ewing Auth t,- . ' DATE r v *If subject property is whin an LID,it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. **The square footage figures used are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. ' N . c:/tamplatdfeeapp/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16,1995/Ord.Nos.4506,,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 e J . 5. • C.t, .;I Renton Department of Planning/Building, -_,ulic Works ' ENVIRONMENTAL it DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS _oAWk-lar‘ COMMENTS DUE: 10/17/97 i' APPLICATION NO: LUA97-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 10/31/97 e APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton 100 Apts. WORK ORDER NO: 78294 • LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S., City block between Logan Ave S and Morris Ave S between S 3rd St. and S 2nd St. SITE AREA: 53,962 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 144,913 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S(approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet,with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor. Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics . Water • Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation • Environmental Health _Public Services • Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS \1,w� clk 1%0�17 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information Is needed to property assess this proposal. �„ t Cvl(M 100197 Sign to a of Director or Authorized Representative Dat DEVAPP. Rev.10/93 • C___ _I"Renton Department of Planning/Building_ _ -'ilicWorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Q•„iai..s.1. sfi -COMMENTS DUE: 10/17/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 10/31/97 APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton 100 Apts. WORK ORDER NO: 78294 LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S., City block between Logan Ave S and Morris Ave S between S 3rd St. and S 2nd St. . SITE AREA: 53,962 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 144,913 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S(approx.4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet,with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities , Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet , B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS QQ d c( 1 O/30117 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. a .,,t - . A<t �dc I C��o�`l 7 Sign f Director or Authorized Representative DateDEVA Rev.10/93 • C.., _f Renton Department of Planning/Building_ _ _'ilic Works ENVIRONMENTAL it DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Q‘dv‘ V to W- LtY"'tut., COMMENTS DUE: 10/17/97 CITY OF R NTO APPLICATION NO: LUA97-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 10/31/97 ii APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosefl I 2 0 1997 PROJECT TITLE: Renton 100 Apts. WORK ORDER NO: 78294 aF sft_._/YtN6 OiVISION LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S., City block between Logan Ave S and Morris Ave S between S 3rd St. and S 2nd St. SITE AREA: 53,962 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 144,913 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S(approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet,with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Wafer Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Q t Awn c. c( t 0/2c)lq 7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. -� 1.614. . -K6-'Nta--) 10/30 f 7 Sig a of Director or Authorized Representative Date II DEVAP• •.• Rev.10/93 � ^-� �rY CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: November 7, 1997 TO: Peter Rosen, Associate Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-Related Comments for Daly Homes 1. The preliminary fire flow required is 3,750 gpm. Four fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and three fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. A looped water main is required to be installed around the building. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of building in the parking and commercial area and at the rate of$388 per multi-family unit in the residential area: 4,610 square feet x $0.52 = $2,397.20 110 units x $388.00 = $42,680.00 Total $45,077.20 This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. An approved fire alarm system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 5. An approved dry standpipe system is required to be installed throughout the structure. CT:ct Daly r 9 Ci -_?Renton Department of Planning/Building l -.olio Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.;REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: MY pber COMMENTS DUE: 10/17/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 10/31/97 APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton.100 Apts. WORK ORDER NO: 78294 LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S., City block between Logan Ave S and Morris Ave S between S 3rd St. and S 2nd St. SITE AREA: 53,962 s.f. . I BUILDING AREA(gross): 144,913 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S(approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels (93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet,with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth 1 X Housing X _ Air X Aesthetics X Water X Light/Giare X Plants 1 X Recreation X Land/Shoreline Use - X Utilities X _ Animals X Transportation X Environmental Health X Public Services X Energy/ X Historic/Cultural X Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet ye s 14,000 Feet as The location of a 100-unit apartment complex shbuld ;bei:perm.itted only with a require- ment that tenants be notified of the proximity of the Renton Airport.E: .Failure to do otherwise may result in increased workload to airport staff as a result of complaints from tenants. Consider possible mitigation fee if this results. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS The proposed 100-unit apartment complex is located just east of the extended centerline of the Renton Airport. It is significant to note that a majority of aircraft turn east over or in the near vicinity of the proposed complex at very low altitude. This area, prior to the approval of the complex, should be declared Compatible with thee. operation of the airport and the flight at very low altitudes by aircraft 7 days a week and 24-hours per day, in the City's Comprehensive Plan. . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS NA We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where add''• Information I eded to properly assess this proposal. Signature�•erector or Authorized Representative Date / /fiz DEVAPP.•• Rev.10/93 ii61_41;1 a t-.1-'"'" \c ui �j01�' IA. �y - =f{--_ n A L: 01 4/2".- ,..,- yr _-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:::::::::::::::A/N ( vf:::::::::-:::-:::-:-:-.7-:-.:-::::-:-:-:-:-:-_ ,,,., __-:-:-:-:-:-:-:::::::::::-_,_,_,..,,__r.A e 1 ..... w ;I It! ift!431 1 % _ ______________________ ______________ _ __________ _____________ I .. . __________---------_ lir `i— 1 -_:_f_.-_:.„:-----H-H-----:::::-:-2-:.-:-.7-:-7.-H-H-:-----__ ..:::::_:::::::_:::::::::::_::_:::::_f_f_f_:,-::::::_:_-_::::_:_-. __„... ...4. 1 .tt. : 4, --------,::::_::::::::::_:::::::::_::_::_:::::-::-Y1-_-:-::::::.. ----- ------------------ - 'Chi IS .1, 1--JL 441 =—_=___—_ __--Y!///?_v_{v__--r= —— i_=___ iiivii- „� � i ; j__et4 VAIA - ` ,..A 1 ai ,,,,„,,,,,,J - __--:__=_--= --- -==___=='= _`- �! gy 11 --_ = ____ _ 'may/:/•--�- -- ___---_- - _-____ --_ t!I; �; , , �,-- , � , J� 1,7-) ., to ■ale--- 6 ::E:E:.-f.-_-,:fk:: 1 1 1 i t . 1 [I.! 2-. reP rir ' ii„ it ro • �t►1�_o0� - p J. A,.,.. 1mmtial_ 7 a ..i Ak. 1 w V��411/1 �L19Lllh 7_.. 1 I. \ � ' `J unEria L�L� -° tim , ---4 - a��co` to °' .. r—_I� li B [kg. ta,. . 1 ! a,� �i<t �rl��jrill . r ` Ear-`'Pi t �1 rl�sfQl 1 �t .• i1 n O�s3 1 I 4, r ,, LB 'r• all I_ �Qla n �w **all-oi .._.• Atie,-,---iNq°1:1 3 ate• `Ili 1!1t c. w ®• q 1 .L -� .-.. 4,,ey • 1:11 . i.,, . lill' i[Eiv/. V4el V... 66.4L"?..1,,- ,_. i. -i,,,,.,; ...:v.o.f4. 75; . , EP 1 - ' ' ^ f "4' „„all d . .I ... -T-To low isk- ...•, liflICE ,I,%. '.. 1, ._;_.... . k41.1,li:IP 1- ;..te -:,,,. . MA 1 ._. .rm ...,...,41/// , -0.514, ' '74-w-- -fifili 'L'=4.....11z.-4R l '-'WIPE " i oiHT-(0- -.-41, -: . ,. . -weviivio - ,-. 1mitizttr/1 -- - .4- - ..diiio a- 17), - I 81 -(4-f, co 6°° '.. ___.. . yignin�� Al '1 ` I 1"'\0 � 12 /ram - ,.____ -.-'... milliedigi i A "1131 :5-: IL-II I\ iiti 11-1101:614,16111111111190k ' '\11\400.11.1 01;1111111:1 airill„.X!I:: . :11...-44,:it. ,_ ,,, ,,... ,.. " mil ' rn co ' ` a1 i in� . • 0,_s,� ` �iC � 1 Ca CO CO It III. J Niii q-e •‘-- • 1--.2-.., perl II 41 I .. "," -Al . 1 liA1-J1 41:1„ 4 ii'; " .. (:111Inil•t »■ i❑� IF-ravL3;Nil N NN ^� I... aI` In ,.., ,_ )c--1'.(14...,,) illicr:n I I 8i M TMn / Pi r f—i, -,_ IP" ram, .;+rll.' 1f•..Gv 4 p -U/ ",`, iJ�.)1 . • 9 I -1 - • ,a t v o!L.+I• ,;• +' tt$, ; /f ., J o�•7 t F y l , sl .ci 0.:1, z/ .h.. '1.•t' z+ '6�� + zf 6 I al. ` ' q L fl't t+ *SC,•_r+ y M •. f -a a ®a.7�� , '02 fir ..le e lI: s ,az ` co //, u o • �y A , Zl,..• 9• 1 w Q%1- gum o. . '!za/f Q 0, .,„ .! r, a,! w..•r,..)..y= ' ): .v Cq I' Cp' N1 s' < j ir4 t••+109•GOG t ;::: 6,r �w.0 ° zZ +• 0 .0lanK, ♦ 9. I r :c��.U'•..cue ,"'-.S ,,,,t,' a ,oa I G e�'' r' 'y •2z 6••„ • " r 39V1d Y - L�� •arse J \�j= UJ 4, ' t p +MEINems. O. �1;.+ O . fz • 5r�.+' B I^ .c. N O. �. 21.J 2K f°"S ,� `•I`t\o q �IZ� / „ f �N w14! s+.,..• .� , MIEN �� zY':'-, _0 • 't [ ` :+•z:u .+ •� ( v.\ ,sw•:kcad tp♦`4t 1 +; `Ol r �' �''�to rr-+• Z• I`a• ro;p 1 ser....'�h,1 �'' , H .40, •f .', •.r, • 7 . ,.. ,,:'. .a 2 �+ a°r �/�1 �e�..;.w•�.. �'I I - y I t li o 1 JI .!;, 71, • , +� t+ ° f e{ P I�'0 :i z' .r• .'. I 2 o t .r ,f w 7-7 f -� '1-• 9L / 2 I.r / •!. .c. ;P rs 9, 0 •0 °Y..r1 A40•104'A i ♦ ✓ e 1111 ~ .f •f 9 I M �• fs II; or 1.01g, -z + .t. ..., k -15 L • k •�T.—i••.•I e11•00 oWf ly OIN 9.• .7 /I, v .+'••+ O/ j •r .c c « - n..,'t a �'P : ` + A.•S+ f r Z :),. .r K G O L 9 9 y 'r'r • ! ,. 7 Or' +.r :21 ape IsFI bt: ••Zip f �' f `` \ :81 c+.• •10 y'e:♦• •'`:19 i`t S sl`^ • p.'sr t pi.A j I,,, :y Y, D,p. I -'�+� a J• c uA art• Js,, i o .e' 9 d; •/ •o t1•-'•' i P;is'',o �Z �. a c�.:o� s • mot 'a •o �.• a �;, p+ i I rl + ql oaM.- . ,)r • f/,.♦I✓r a ,, e• i[l .....' l•c Y t O I 1 r « - Tif••' �\ �•n1 _:� Ut o+f`` i 'pl a, pp, L s 'L._ •fr'`•e t '91 ck ^ rz'•' ; •+''cf T,/'• t CO t ' f t0.}' l t� -_„'— F: .GI ,r-•: 9 •• ••t, I/ a 9 , t `i yi.° b/� J YA•' - '^ t.t S+i++ �+� 1��1 r�� I. 81 cti P q . e .91 p`t,•+ .., ♦+ 9. ` ,.,, ,. z .. '4 _ r �� /, t Z,,.. t' -••� .. •LI N,eea „pp 3 4 ,, , l/ i t ' �.•S,. 0�.© :.rlx.�(�•V 0•aG'-�± .. a3gld .r. p• a pr'+ i %I p ' p 1 N qe,' Ufa uy• n .s: ,n•i:.+.�"/'�.'1 +•t :�`� ,,,,` `ad03J ,. el,(i daaP r •t , 0/¢ . •rJ� ++�!.L.j ,.ON' ; " 3 .••� .r .c ° so' iris.• a 5+ ✓••''s +,i✓ r. Z/ e• + a+� ! :9 'ON't, G - .GI'`wo Rye : , R A Z ,,N ) •r 1.0,0 Z• ii �o;, .S� N �,} +,a , ,,+f. , t 9P',,•+ © tiz t•�� •2 i ,{� 1 3S dO 1 1. 1, - 4 .1 `.' 7 . . .•'` v• •t ,II., j,r. p. 1'1 j{wall ! ,OZ sii I: pe `o2r5.7 ., II j +� -.f �' e r ''«..'i'. c I z"�»a .r'•, I`LO , TC ' „II L , 'i !+ll •MI[-IY-60c1 �1 J -- ]I+iel.zJ .$ /�! �i ,.I 4. 1 •• .._ ..a .c..(1. " -- _ .- 1. • '\� may_ ZC—e.,,, J, . _ __ a .. ...,.s 0 ,...‘..• , . .... . . . .. . c., lb ------7 ..,,,,_. y K. 1` \ ,,...• • .. 0- • ., - . ---�- • —_�I 1 -q I(• 1 0' 'r---.) I1\, ' ` [. P.A. a o+ sne a ), lra• •...r• Opel • ... \1 I • �� u ,(. ,/,1 G. (' fps"�:.�a�.' 9,.,;y is I -� ;.+'"1. . R t� (�;V'� . 1 ` • • ,.I ti -P T .,l •% Ala I Mot, .f „it z.7 — ___A e a • \ ` ' ` . N •la •iiu ofso, °r +;�• '•,• .'a . , G I •'�. On a .:. I14 It,•,.,.. 71 M•w • :.. ..•. •! .•en..N1O° W•t• \ y ie. • , •• ice . {t V •, ,il I�•• • • 6, o --JJIa` �_-' n ',-� m ••le,,.11 it —_ f MI :. '—•.—-— v, r 1:01J,n y r'1• U.•�,'Vi a' I hi—, i.e.,..,-.cs, '" r w. SL mar -- —{ rc Juntown Dore Ai ea lirir/ ____. > _, im .,c \ -1 a0, . , z — z 11.111111 > > < MIME 1), >, _Y *111411 = I L p d � d `n . N 2nd St I II I I 17.11M11111 II ri > III , �� ME III lei IMMI U d �� 3� Ell IIIII O fS,III I 1.1 ll Mil ■aim Tobin Ave S Tobin INE = ■ I III ... III 1111 1,) Co * 1C 40Q �t o� la > > . Q Q n 3 a, > J 3 / er S 2nd St S 2nd St Ili1111111.1. 1 MIN n• Q > set d p C `,Q� Q l`` Al r3_ 1 ...... JS 3rd Stems it: S 3rd St AI d■ 3 0o5; -- S 4th St 1� ____ - % ,= - IV 1 L �� — — J L O —xi(-) 11111 L IMMEM MEM a --moo .(-(\ S > 0 400 800 c„ O Long Range Planning C + st + Planning/Building/Public Works 1 :4,8 0 0 ,,P- ^� T. Schlepp, 0. Dennison, R. MacOnie T% 15 October 1997 IIMMEMEMOMMEMM Downtown Core Area Boundary r Jr., City of Renton Department of Planning I Building/-....c Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: vaktoe COMMENTS DUE: 10/17/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 10/31/97 APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rosen PROJECT TITLE: Renton 100 Apts. WORK ORDER NO: 78294 • LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S., City block between Logan Ave S and Morris Ave S between S 3rd St. and S 2nd St. • SITE AREA: 53,962 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 144,913 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S(approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet,with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing _ Air _ Aesthetics Water _ LightGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use . Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health _ Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources . Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Cy-mato-1z ..,62,o-ed -17_, ,, -i- atofroAit-A----- 0 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where add' nnal information is needed to properly assess th' roposal. Signature Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 11 3 A.' Trespass BUSINESS En f o r c e m e n t WATCH • Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY,AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours. business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code#6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code#6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. `nY o COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT • CRIME PREVENTION UNIT e �_'`�''�' 235- 2571 PROJECT LUA-97-155 SA-H, ECF Renton 100 Apts. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 104 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction(flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED COMPLEX Coded access as entry to each building is recommended to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property. Each unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood with peep holes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2" in length when extended and installed with 3"wood screws. Sliding windows, including the glass patio doors, will need additional locks; these locks will need to secure the windows from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any lock that limits horizontal movement. Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. The stairways at the complex should be constructed of lattice or metal railing so visibility is possible through the stairway. There should not be any solid walls in any stairway that would serve to limit the visibility up and down the stairs and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a homeowner Page 1 of 2 PROJECT LUA-97-155 SA-H, ECF Renton 100 Apts. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) to return home. In additional, the balcony walls also need to be made of either metal or wood lattice or railing -no solid walls for the same purpose. Extra security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the sidewalks, in the stairways, and alleyway. Each unit should have their individual unit numbers listed clearly, with the number at least 6" in height of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and placed under a light. This will aid police or medics who respond to a call in finding the unit they need to go to. Landscaping around the exterior and interior of the plaza should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into a unit. Parking garages are targeted frequently by criminals, so it's important to have any entrance into the parking garage be a monitored security entrance. Either a security guard or coded entrance to this part of the building is recommended. Strong lighting is also needed in this type of enclosure to keep tenants safe while they're walking to and from their vehicle. Since part of this building will be a shopping center, it's extremely important to keep the living entrances and shop entrances separate from one another. Having a public and private building mixed together could encourage loitering and it could make it difficult to ascertain who belongs on the premises and who does not after hours. All individual shops should adhere to the same structural recommendations as mentioned above for the apartment units (i.e., solid core entrance doors, locking devices, peepholes, etc.) Each back door to each business will need auxiliary locking devices, in addition to heavy-duty deadbolt locks (such as latch guard and pry-resistant cylinders around the locks). Each business needs a security alarm system. Access to the back of the buildings should be limited, preferably with security fencing. After the businesses have closed, this area could become dangerous due to the lack of natural surveillance by business merchants or tenants. Page 2 of 2 Ci.1 Renton Department of Planning/Building. . _Jlic Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIOfiE SJ JEWEH►EET FI PPr_A: . • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F'\Ye Po$ue)44hV\ COMMENTS DUE: 10/17/97 geT 1 7 1 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-155,SA-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 10/31/97 M APPLICANT: Daily Homes, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER: Peter Rost d,t I V a—0 PROJECT TITLE: Renton 100 Apts. WORK ORDER NO: 78294 LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S., City block between Logan Ave S and Morris Ave S between S 3rd St. and S 2nd St. . SITE AREA: 53,962 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 144,913 s.f. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant, Daily Homes, seeks a proposal for a four story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Ave S(approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls), and 110 multi-family residential units on the three upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into three attached building wings oriented around two landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approx. 50 feet,with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary - Earth Housing Air Aesthetics _ Wafer Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities _ Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet iv • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Ai a--iv\q , • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS � JJQQ�� N^e /o 17 cj7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to pro et!),assess this roposal. ''4-i V 1/14,S f0797 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 DEVELOPMENT PLANNINP CITY nF ocq!rnq! October22, 1997 OCT 2 7 N99? Peter Rosen ECEIVEL Project Manager,Development Services Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 RE: Project Renton 100 Apartments/LU-A-97 455, SA-H, ECF Dear Mr. Rosen: I was pleased to receive the-notice-of application-for the Daily Homes-proposal to build a 4 story, mixed-use building to be located in downtown Renton. I'm pleased to see the City Council-work so hard to re-establish the downtown area as it will positively affect property values in Renton. I'm also pleased that the money spent shopping/living in the area will- automatically cycle-back into the area. With the resulting area benefit cycle in mind,I wanted to offer my opinion for the record that any additional funds needed to establish-the apartment structure foundation due to the surrounding area soil content should be subsidized by the City of Renton. Of course,Daily Homes should-be-responsible-for all-original cost projections for the-project. I'm looking forward to hearing the results of the proposed Geotechnical and Drainage studies. Sincerel Beverly A. BI ell 215 Whitworth Ave S. Downtown-Renton 41111 $ o CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works .44 4. A rIdJ CID � iP,4,4vA-= ' -; 210 Mill Avenue South-Renton, Washington 98055 1- ,,$ / �`� i. - . WPC - - Fig I, ' � ��°t � SIN �1 ' A' y r 5Yb . . P o S u u e : PI) 1„01 Oki VIArlaEW- ODITli Mary Ann Putman 505 S 2nd Vac St - Rom- , w� 9 O SS 1 I NO SUCHr ��`S-5 a J7 • , \ ;tiili'k� is r ` 3 ?) • l , , �. ..r :E. :. L1; a„ u.S f _ lilili14i ii "l iii i i' `fl °II i_ • • • ' NTO� NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS • DATE: OCTOBER 17, 1997 • Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: Renton 100 Apartments LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Daily Homes,seeks a proposal for a.4 story, mixed-use building In downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Avenue S. (approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage (145 parking stalls),and 110 multi-family residential units on the 3 upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial • space is broken into 3 attached building wings oriented around 2 landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets Is approximately 50 feet, with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. The main entrance to the parking garage(intended for residents)would be from the Seattle Pipeline right-of-way accessed off Logan Ave.S.or Morris Ave.S. A secondary entrance is proposed from the alley at the northwest corner of the building. There is a street-level main entry to a lobby and the residential portion of the building at the southeast corner of the property on Logan Ave. S. The commercial space may be divided into individual leasable spaces with separate entrances from Logan Avenue S. GENERAL LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S.,City block between Logan Avenue S.and Morris Avenue S.and between S.3rd Street and S.2nd Street STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: Geotechnical Study,Drainage Study PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton;WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 1,1997. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on December 9,1997 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave.South. If you are Interested In attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division, 277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted In writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional ' information by mail,contact Peter Rosen,Project Manager,at 235-2719. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: October 16,1997 • NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 17,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: October 17,1997 GENMALOT.DOC • ay „e 4' `v 4 °- •,. �l I•61 aU z/ 4/roe �ti' z/, '6i� `.• z/' 6 ° ar, �`4604 60 4. Ot\ • It L m . L. t• z �' e M. f•' a • ../r n L G1_, SSA oL -� ° e 0 elegy •• U 1•1 •<. = a • y a.. 5!3 t/ °9 -t I, 2 w //.� op o;''' �.••• /i 'oz i} T ;r /i: x 'a._.....-1.-...-- }-O //,� • 4� r y• r ' . a„, yy.9 n ' 70�.f1 `' 0• { •/z .° £6Z�.°• 0/• v2};;�• �;:�•a,. a, in U. o ys;.• o/• •1r o o/.! �r..tea.0 Os1r c a •� 1D !' j'••� )f I '_�p: I! 'r, ...t ..+...,,ice• 4/'`•V°`.t: 2.4 : , E•l1•• l ....'t N C.E _ 016• . •za er,• • . • 2x p•° • , . ; •6•e .9Z _ _J e�. �® • M�c•N, �r,_ .- o y, .13 S °• ,IZ/ •S/ ` " r• E.' ! C<''li2 to .1• ' .a• 1 ` t:;:. , .r. v 0 Y At' °3 _` °,a.•1' r •,. Y• 'ol' tt • ';!• i�t^,;. 3 � o • iZ •. ! w St ®1•.. r r 4•:• r '7n• r g 4-P r♦ Ps Ur. r• fY+ •y •-a. ri . • ..,are j• r. r, 'C.. v rr. N •• .r a. to 5 opt* `,� rrr ° B ( 01 ,xG ..J<<tu r ,iL r••' ey,t� :10. gr.-,..:If. 0,I•Alt • f'r; d•'c •� M' f':'�,' • . e a O Q oao .ati•..M.. .� �' ,- o r •. . .' • ..' ° . 'f '• •l*a• 5.' 1.:i `+ •.°'q ,' ,JI t �0 ,' • 1 mo •1 4 o ,.. ,... d i� *+ :6,NIr_ -;7i'_` o •a a . 1,' • 1 •' *+ • ,". j,'C 1•^'S\Dl''c•pa i, 11. e_, r1 _, I .ra „' y • / z c r q . ar a" $•`i"�r+�= z �. ? n c i 4 D • T r 4'J.✓,Y•/aYre •'•14 or eI ri •t r�^ .r •t .. J:• P. .r•r f. i:' I ..r •e I•• I• _§•.ao 0. f . 6WVI'401Y,:pl�: //it*,.+ ..0 O/:.14 i! •rl.r ,,, y zv•Sa c 2 V: ac .r 6 13 1. 9 S' II 1.1 ,1 1• •• 6 f f : •/'rr••�� y' ,cam•f y w��. C,1• ,•, • I fF 6 t• •2/ 6• 91 °? V JC' I i.t 1• •• * °9 tp :�°- fy •'•• `a f �.°` ti0: ,,.i + ° III •• *a,L, Q.- a .1= 1•f,.fi'I,4i, a'h.•' B .a Ll•'...•i/ /r 2` Q 1 • _ j t .. .. :1` •• l•• �(L a C ••*4•,a1t L 9/ ` f•.£k ^ 2•"• 1 ••'.cs T+•/� �•• ;�, a t [.]M, L.! ;-'i,a Fel �Ta1L•__m__ is a.r • Hai'•r--: 9 • • •S/ ae /;�,o �... '�,,._.. .. St!•yt�1t .z� + • Yt�_ �.t ,,,�CV .` VI 4.L 22 C-11 _ r / a• V. • ad,„ '10• •v t I NN NO . ••if vt. .'t d'.V �-'..?rixa +4'i.�.•� ..rr r.r ..� �3^l� L/ter.^ °• o•• °.'�• • `I W °•...r.l•9 , ' m 'T ..r 9�• 9:T I /• ~n��' a�0.3J. •s. I° 1 tp Ot0' - a ay. , • d J 1 r LEI �T-•.ate f , r .�. 1.r 1: F. C°°e 1. J'- •' 1 91 S r.l 2/ •a• �.• .•�!' L •y f,ti, . ', 1£ •a•f...- i 4- .••yl �7.(-(ba •r •c - : -to ,1 ,. w e N 7 .r ( 04.- �. !9W'. 1 _•�.0 Z'= S . It air . sot,•:. •N I 4 •• 2• 11•••r1\ s� ,�ta `I4f: YaJ •'AiZ �spt (. {w�1II -d0 1 p 1, .... 1 A "I,.,•ri r '►►►\•••---ii 1 '.!/.,'.Y' i'•� 9' `L 3,s,•' j r' °a ''- Z l0 - 1 :'('t 11 't'(/J . IZeir of 1 P9 �.'vZ N „ >rai/�� _)i a r+ r --�- °r n7G.a F Z / •cl.r r •�� 1* T_- a , t a P 6 0 :. N 1- N 11 ° r •Ya�.ar •+ ° MI£-IY-60 II `, 1. •__J_.--J--AZI :'CI •••- 2,_-_- . • . •4G--- • I. : Zc-ow,r,�a r , 1/11 • L•�� -•, I_/••I ri ""v ' Ste{r.2 oa a , :" rots .. ' '•1 P a P 1 S a'a3-••- '. I. • r.ra . ____ 0 ra• 6:• D, a •(` •z Lai• 7 __ • /� �', s +te I \,' • • � • 1.1 • _ o,t,t at° L r, . �`osc •Sti' .� na `• h7 I n• I -L.• :.� �� 'L.�,-°1' ®•' '� o'•tn� S•� %t. LW S••.r! °°6 • • P1 1 • • • i 1 G� 1I t 9.O I 6 IPA, t.an', r,'•• .t! f% • I • .. /._,.tf•••i1., •S' ,° fn° islia�•• •o.�f tY ..,�� • • . . 'til'' • •q Yr �. j. Ge��'.a. .�._.,�: n. NS•Oyc�av 'F.vo�. • • ••>I --R ( t1 fl o •', Ra ^ Yes' r • ;y: 7.� ' ...net 6. a Gr(li►Y 1 �,. ,6C£., �`• I • .•'1, .to -1 ..,..at ` • ?°flo, Z °a f:ir� �•, i. ,, 11 • 1P _- IY �-o '0•1 �r-C1'J.- •-r sa.^ Z � a, -- i,.aa--c _ _ . ` - r 0 f/'�art__ z r,•• .• • •t. 1'� torsi *':61 1...i I 7 I yIL. 1. r1., a 1 1,1. •: 'GEL_. A$ �'' rI o C • , ' ( � _._. _ �. r T lln•rrr 1 :-: I ate- •f �•�: It �' A-•1.t®•y ar • .......................................... ••• CITY OF RP41ON - LIST OF SURROUNDINGPR 0 PE RTYNOWNERV"'"'"' • PROJECT NAME: oTo tJ I 0 0 PT, • APPLICATION NO: Z-Uto, e7"2 - /s-s— The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development. Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • •.'• •. . • . , • . . • • • ,„ • RECEIVED • , . , • OCT 1 6 1997 DEVEL013A0, 477 PLANNING , • ' CITYPE'REF4tiON -•• • • • -7* «so `"t..rzil 'A •4, ,r• • • , . • „ • ,••• (Attach additional 1 . .I (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER li 1 Applicant Certification I, ('t{R.is roi311-�Iz c, Mooiar , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: 0 City of Renton Technical Services Records !I Si Title Company Records /ing Cou , Assessors Records Signed Date 0/d/ . pplicant NOTARY ATTESTED: Sub crib d an sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at e:te‘,40v— on the/ day of 6 C*0 , 19 99. Signed --illyvvitkiAg‘ .W,47•Ylt .a? (Notary Public) tv. f:R n On:>;Use:::>»»:< ::<»»»:;» »»:«<»:>:>:-:»::»»:-::»:»>:»:<>:>:< :>::»::>:::::: ............................................................................ : »::::>::::»»:<:»::>::»>:<:»::;<:::::»::»::>::»><::>>::>:::::::«:> >:<:>::::::>::>:: >:»::»»> ERTIF.:I.CATf�.N::>. E..M o ..:.ereti'`;>ce`rti..:;:: ha�"zioi ic'e$>:of..t...e.. ...o .9...e.....a . ........t................i...................t...:._...: .:.: h;>lis ed:: r.. a...;> .wner,:::. .n;:<:::.. .... .. ...� .. .. ... : ..:..:. ......... ..... ... ::::::::: ::::: : _:::. ::::::::::.�::::::::::::::::::.......::::: :.::::: ::..:.:....................... .r ;:: fit ..;: <:€°:"> ::<>"': > :..�� ;` ' ' ' ' > >>>>>> ''<�>' ': > > > '.<>:: ><>�>>><`'�'�`''`>`�'' '"'».;:>` >' > >`: >>>>��<�':i' i >» »> »�' K ..: :.. :: .>::: .;;:.::>:.;:... :;;;;:;;>,:.::.;: .<.;;:.:: .::;.:>:i::;:;:k>:>::. : . .. ..... ;:.;:• :.:.;:.;:.: N,•� ;�� ed.'s�ridt.�..�......,,r *......... ......::.:..........................::.;;;:.;;:.;:.;;:.;:.;:.:�;;ate.:......�........................ K .. ::::::.�:::•.�:.:�i::n•.ii:.i?isiiiXiiiiiiiYiiiSi:.i?i?i:iYiiiriiii:iry^:4i::::::.�:::::::::.�::::::::::::::::::. . :.. .. t n a . .................NOTARY::::. .::.. ...... ............ .................................................:.:...::::::: ::. If r ' - :`''fii�:%:::.:.;:::::`�'<: :::::::::::::%:::::5::: ::::':::�?':':i:`:::::`:'::::::::::::i::i::�::';: : %::�::? :c2: ::`;:'::' :::':::;::?::;:%:%:%:: :�:::i::::::::::::2:: %`is2:: :::: :::�::::%2:::':%:�:::::::i: :';'::':`;:::i; ::i::::::::'':`:::::y: :::i:::+:::'::: ._ . ;-.. P4i e ....;::E`"�',;.:.Subscr..ibe.d:aqc(.:$.worn:.bef.re::me::a.:N:ota.::..PobT.c:.......a::::.:::::::::::x.::�:::.:x.:;ke.;..o...::.::::g.:::::.:..9.t.4:::::.::::. :. t1,11 � ., _ ;.:5{dillg.aI:#.. �:.�:•ms�.,�.+r.,�:.r�w.. ...#.�:.�,�. ahe.„ � �W .:::::�!:�:::::.:: . .:•....... ........r•;;;;;;:.;......: : IREV 07 95 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 2 =MET SCAN PROPERTY PR ! ILE= King (WA) OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Parcel Number : 569600 0010 06 Q : SE S: 18 T: 23N R : 05E Building Id # : 1 Parcel Type :Platted Owner/Taxpayer : City Of Renton CoOwner Site Address : 255 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Mail Address : 200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Telephone : Owner : Tenant : SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Recording Date : 07/07/95 Loan Amount : Auditors Fee# : 1003 Multi-Parcel Lender Sale Price : $900,000 Full Loan Type : Deed Type : Warranty Interest Rate : Owned : 100 Vesting Type : Corporation ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Land : $143,200 %Improved : 7 Structure : $11,300 1997 Taxes : $1.25 Total : $154,500 Exempt Code . Levy Code : 2100 Excise Tax# : 1436914 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Census : Tract: 253.00 Block: 5 Map Grid : 656 C2 Neighborhood Cd : 530000 Zoning Code : Cm Land Use : 403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Legal :BLK 1 LOT 2-3-4-5 MOTOR LINE ADD : TO RENTON Sub/Plat :Motor Line Add To Renton Recording Num : • Short Plat , Volume : 9 Page : 50 • • ' "' Jurisdiction Profile-Page,.1'of.2-'•, • The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. =MET: SCAN PROPERTY PR ( ILE= • King (WA) Parcel# : 569600 0010 Bldg Id# : 1 PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms : 1st Floor SF : Year Built : 1972 Bath Full : 2nd Floor SF : Eff Year : 1974 Bath 3/4 : 3+Floor SqFt : Garage Type : Bath 1/2 : Half Floor SF : Bsmnt Type : Other Rms : AboveGroundSF : BsmntGrade : Dining Rm : Finished SqFt : Bldg Matl :Frame Fireplace : Fin Bsmnt SF : Bldg Cond : Appliance : UnftnBsmnt SF : Bldg Grade : Avg Deck : BsmntTotal SF : Wall Matl : Porch : Bsmnt Park SF : • %of Brick : Pool : Building SqFt : 200 %of Stone : Spa : Lease SqFt : 200 HeatSource : ' Sauna : Deck SqFt : Heat Type :Electric Tennis : Carport SqFt ElectrcSvc : Stories : 1 AttachedGrgSF : Wtr Source : Units : DetachedGrgSF : Sewer Type : Elevator :No Nuisance : Design Type : LAND INFORMATION VIEW INFORMATION STREET INFORMATION Lot Acres : .46 View :None St Surface : Lot SqFt : 20,451 View City : St Access : Std Lot Shape : Irregular View Lake/River : St Light : Tde/Upind : View Lk Wa/Samm : Curb/Gutter : Topogrphy : View Mountain : Sidewalk : TopoProbs View Puget . Sprinkler :No WtrFront Unit Mix 1 .• WtrFrntSF : Unit Mix 2 • GroundCvr : Unit Mix 3 • GolfAdj : Unit Mix 4 • Unit Mix S •• Profile-Page 2 of 2 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. =MET SCAN PROPERTY PRo ILE= • King (WA) OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Parcel Number : 784180 0035 00 Q : SE S: 18 T: 23N R : 05E Building Id # : Parcel Type :Platted Owner/Taxpayer : City Of Renton CoOwner Site Address : 210 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 Mail Address : 200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Telephone : Owner : Tenant : SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION Recording Date : 07/07/95 Loan Amount : Auditors Fee# : 1003 Multi-Parcel Lender Sale Price : $900,000 Full Loan Type : Deed Type : Warranty Interest Rate : %Owned : 100 Vesting Type : Corporation . ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION Land : $236,300 %Improved : Structure : $700 1997 Taxes : $1.25 Total : $237,000 Exempt Code . Levy Code : 2100 Excise Tax# : 1436914 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Census : Tract: 253.00 Block: 5 Map Grid : 656 C2 Neighborhood Cd : 530000 Zoning Code : Cm Land Use : 401 Pub,Parking,Associated Legal :BLK 1 LOT 6-7 SMITHERS 6TH ADD TO :RENTON&POR VAC ALLEY ADJ Sub/Plat : Smithers 6th Add To Renton • Recording Num : Short Plat Volume : 26 Page : 47 Jurisdiction Profile-Page 1 of 2 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. =MET 1SCAN PROPERTY PRI ILE= • King (WA) Parcel# : 784180 0035 Bldg Id# : PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Bedrooms : 1st Floor SF : Year Built : Bath Full : 2nd Floor SF : Eff Year : Bath 3/4 : 3+Floor SqFt : Garage Type : Bath 1/2 : Half Floor SF : Bsmnt Type : Other Rms : AboveGroundSF : BsmntGrade : Dining Rm : Finished SqFt : Bldg Matl : Fireplace : Fin Bsmnt SF : Bldg Cond : Appliance : UnfinBsmnt SF : Bldg Grade : Deck : BsmntTotal SF : Wall Matl : Porch : Bsmnt Park SF : %of Brick : Pool Building SqFt : %of Stone : Spa : Lease SqFt : HeatSource : Sauna : Deck SqFt : Heat Type : Tennis : Carport SqFt : ElectrcSvc : Stories : AttachedGrgSF : Wtr Source : Units : DetachedGrgSF : Sewer Type : Elevator :No Nuisance : DesignType : LAND INFORMATION VIEW INFORMATION STREET INFORMATION Lot Acres : .77 View :None St Surface : Lot SqFt : 33,761 View City : St Access : Std Lot Shape : Irregular View Lake/River : St Light : Tde/Upind : View Lk Wa/Samm : Curb/Gutter : Topogrphy : View Mountain : Sidewalk : TopoProbs View Puget . Sprinkler :No Wtr Front : Unit Mix 1 • WtrFrntSF Unit Mix 2 . GroundCvr : Unit Mix 3 • GolfAdj Unit Mix 4 .• ' Unit Mix S : Profile-Page 2 of 2 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. * ' - MetroScan / King :--- * ' Owner :Perfection Tire Partr _ hip 2 Parc # :784180 0025 02 'Site :S 2nd St Renton Sale Date : 04/22/91 Mail :602 E 2nd Ave Spokane Wa 99202 Sale Price :$43,720 Full Use :921 Vacant,Commercial,Less Than 1 Acre Asd.V :$57,400 Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 4-5 SMITHERS 6TH ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .17 YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King : * Owner :Big Five Holdings Inc Parcel # :784180 0205 04 Site :S 3rd St Renton Sale Date :10/22/92 Mail :2525 E El Segundo Blvd El Segundo Ca 90245 Sale Price :$620, 000 Use :401 Pub,Parking,Associated Asd.V :$43,800 Lgl :BLK 6 LOT 5 SMITHERS 6TH ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .12 YB: Ph:310-536-0611 * MetroScan / King * Owner :World Association For Child Parcel # :784180 0085 09* Site :305 S 2nd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :10/05/93 Mail :PO Box 88948 Seattle Wa 98138 Sale Price :$460, 000 Full Use :252 Com,Retail Store,l0k-25k Sqft Asd.V :$551,700 Lgl :BLK 3 SMITHERS 6TH ADD TO RENTON Q:SE S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:13, 046 Ac: .33 YB: 1957 Ph: * : MetroScan / King * Owner :Renton Lutheran Church Parcel # :784180 0045 08 Site :403 S 2nd St Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :200 Whitworth Ave S #01143- Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :407 Pub,Church,Religious Services Asd.V :$407,900 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 1-2-3 SMITHERS 6TH ADD Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:9,504 Ac: .41 YB:1946 Ph:425-226-1751 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Renton Lutheran Church Parcel # :784180 0080 04 Site :419 S 2nd St Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :200 Whitworth Ave S #01143- Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :407 Pub,Church,Religious Services Asd.V :$58,900 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 7 SMITHERS 6TH ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 B1dgSF:912 Ac: .14 YB:1930 Ph:425-226-1751 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Putman Mary Ann Parcel # :784180 0005 06 Site :505 S 2nd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :10/25/96 Mail :505 S 2nd Vac St Wa Sale Price . Use :921 Vacant,Commercial,Less Than 1 Acre Asd.V :$59,400 Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 1-2 SMITHERS 6TH ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: . 18 YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Fakharzadeh M Hadi Parcel # :784180 0015 04 Site :511 S 2nd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/29/89 Mail :PO Box 78404 Seattle Wa 98178 Sale Price :$66, 085 Use :105 Res,Apartment Asd.V :$45,800 Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 3-4 SMITHERS 6TH ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .13 YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King : * Owner :Mathews Vera Jean Parcel # :569600 0145 04 Site :526 S 2nd St Renton 98055 Sale Date : 10/09/91 Mail :10415 SE 174th St #5268 Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :401 Pub,Parking,Associated Asd.V :$38, 000 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 2 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:NE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .11 YB: Ph: * : MetroScan / King : * Owner :Mathews Vera Jean Parcel # :569600 0140 09 Site :526 S 2nd St Renton 98055 Sale Date : 10/09/91 Mail :10415 SE 174th St #5268 Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :531 Ind,Service Bldg,Less Than 2k Sqft Asd.V :$53,100 Lgl :BLK 3 LOT 1 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:NE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF:754 Ac: .11 YB:1949 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * - - MetroScan / King : - * ' Owner :Williams Thomas H Parc # :569600 0090 09 •Site : 603 S 2nd St Renton 98055 Sale Date Mail :13329 SE 253rd P1 Kent Wa 98042 Sale Price Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$203,400 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 9-10-11 MOTOR LINE ADD Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:2, 908 Ac: .40 YB:1963 Ph:253-631-0149 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Sci Management Corp Parcel # :784180 0140 02 Site :400 S 3rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date Mail :1929 Allen Pkwy Houston Tx 77019 Sale Price Use :421 Pub,Funeral,Crematory,Cemetery Asd.V :$484,900 Lgl :BLK 5 LOT 3-4-5-6 SMITHERS 6TH ADD Q:SE S: 18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:8,440 Ac: .34 YB:1929 Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Crosby Linda Christine;Carman Randy E Parcel # :784180 0155 04 Site :410 S 3rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date : 07/06/94 Mail :2601 NE 23rd Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price Use :251 Com,Retail Store,Less Than 10k Sqft Asd.V :$110,200 Lgl :BLK 5 LOT 6 SMITHERS 6TH ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:2,947 Ac: .08 YB:1940 Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Salvation Army Parcel # :784180 0165 02 Site :422 S 3rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date Mail :PO Box 9219 Seattle Wa 98109 Sale Price Use :412 Pub,Retail,Discount Asd.V :$272,600 Lgl :BLK 5 LOT 7-8-9 SMITHERS 6TH ADD Q:SE S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 B1dgSF:9,953 Ac: .35 YB:1942 Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Renton Civic Theatre Parcel # :783980 0016 07 Site :503 S 3rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :08/13/93 Mail :PO Box 1556 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price :$175, 000 Full Use :347 Rec,Movies,Walk-In Asd.V :$196,800 Lgl :BLK 34 LOT 3-4 SMITHERS 2ND ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:6, 636 Ac: .11 YB:1939 Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Olosky Curtis C & Shelley L Parcel # :784180 0185 08 Site :504 S 3rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/18/92 Mail :504 S 3rd St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$200,000 Full Use :347 Rec,Movies,Walk-In Asd.V :$200, 000 Lgl :BLK 6 LOT 1-2 SMITHERS 6TH ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:8,564 Ac: .18 YB:1936 Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Sunlite Rest-Inc Parcel # :783980 0015 08 Site :507 S 3rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date Mail :509 S 3rd St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price Use :425 Pub,Restaurant,Lounges Asd.V :$206,700 Lgl :BLK 34 LOT 3 SMITHERS 2ND ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:3,990 Ac: .10 YB:1947 Ph:425-228-4320 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Big Five Holdings Inc Parcel # :784180 0195 06 Site :510 S 3rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :10/22/92 Mail :2525 E El Segundo Blvd El Segundo Ca 90245 Sale Price :$620,000 Use :252 Com,Retail Store, 10k-25k Sqft Asd.V :$383,100 Lgl :BLK 6 LOT 3-4 SMITHERS 6TH ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:13,444 Ac: .25 YB:1925 Ph:310-536-0611 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Sunlite Restaurant Inc Parcel # :783980 0005 00 Site :511 S 3rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date : 09/12/95 Mail :509 S 3rd St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$87,500 Lgl :BLK 34 LOT 1-2 SMITHERS 2ND ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .24 YB: Ph:425-228-4320 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * •• - MetroScan / King :---- * Owner :City Of Renton Par<. . # :569600 0005 03 •Site :528 S 3rd St Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/07/95 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$900,000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$60,600 Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 1 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .17 YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :La Joy Mary Jane Parcel # :569600 0105 02 Site :215 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date Mail :13784 Marchant Ave Sylmar Ca 91342 Sale Price Use :108 Res,Single Family Residence,Comm Us Asd.V :$117,200 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 12-13 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:2,628 Ac: .29 YB:1908 Ph: 818-367-2541 * MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :569600 0120 03 Site :219 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/07/95 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$900, 000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$45,900 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 15 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .14 YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :569600 0115 00 Site :219 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/07/95 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$900, 000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$46,200 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 14 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: . 14 YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King • * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :569600 0065 00 Site :233 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date : 05/02/97 Mail :233 Burnett Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$1, 000,000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$37,500 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 4 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: . 11 YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :569600 0050 07 Site :233 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date : 07/07/95 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$900,000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$20,100 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 1 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: ,05 YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Adams John W & Emily J Parcel # :569600 0075 08 Site :233 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :08/22/90 Mail :7548 S Sunnycrest Rd Seattle Wa 98178 Sale Price Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$37,500 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 6 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .11 YB: Ph:206-772-2267 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Picini Elizabeth Parcel # :569600 0080 01 Site :233 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date : 08/27/92 Mail :1813 NW 77th St Seattle Wa 98117 Sale Price . Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$37,500 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 7 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE , S: 18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .11 YB: Ph:206-782-6720 * MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :569600 0055 02 Site :233 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :05/02/97 Mail :233 Burnett Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$1, 000, 000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$615,100 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT POR MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF:23,740 Ac: . 67 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * F MetroScan / King : - * Owner :City Of Renton Parc__ # :569600 0070 03 'Site :233 Burnett Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :05/02/97 Mail :233 Burnett Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$1, 000, 000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$37,500 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 5 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .11 YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Washington Mutual Svgs Bk Parcel # :569600 0200 06 Site :150 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :12/01/93 Mail :1191 2nd Ave #950 Seattle Wa 98101 Sale Price :$1,267, 600 Full Use :404 Pub,Bank Asd.V :$634,700 Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 1-2 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:NE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:7,294 Ac: .45 YB:1968 Ph: * : MetroScan / King * Owner :Jasper Lorraine G Parcel # :569600 0085 06 Site :204 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :30925 Webster Rd E Eatonville Wa 98328 Sale Price . Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$40, 000 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 8 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: . 11 YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Perfection Tire Partnership Parcel # :569600 0030 02 Site :205 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date : 01/30/90 Mail :205 Logan Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :533 Ind,Service Bldg, l0k To 25k Sqft Asd.V :$384,400 Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 6-7-8 MOTOR LINE ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:11,163 Ac: .34 YB:1950 Ph: * : MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :569600 0010 06 Site :255 Logan Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date : 07/07/95 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$900, 000 Full Use :403 Pub,Automotive,Retail Asd.V :$154,500 Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 2-3-4-5 MOTOR LINE ADD Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:200 Ac: .46 YB:1972 Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Renton Lutheran Church Parcel # :784180 0075 01 Site :205 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date . Mail :200 Whitworth Ave S #01143- Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$85,700 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 6 SMITHERS 6TH ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:920 Ac: .11 YB:1924 Ph:425-226-1751 * : MetroScan / King : * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :784180 0035 00 Site :210 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/07/95 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$900, 000 Full Use :401 Pub,Parking,Associated Asd.V :$237, 000 Lgl :BLK 1 LOT 6-7 SMITHERS 6TH ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .77 YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Searing Timothy J Parcel # :784180 0065 03 Site :211 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :08/09/95 Mail :211 Morris Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$57,500 Use :261 Off,1-3 Story,Less Than 5k Sqft Asd.V :$240, 000 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 4 & 5 SMITHERS 6TH ADD Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:4, 666 Ac: .28 YB: 1965 Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Fernyhough Stanley G Parcel # :784180 0183 00 Site :280 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date : 07/05/83 Mail :10008 Rainier Ave S Seattle Wa 98178 Sale Price :$275, 000 Use :111 Res,Apartment,5 To 9 Units Asd.V :$268,700 Lgl :BLK 6 LOT 1 SMITHERS 6TH ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:2 BldgSF:9,565 Ac: .13 YB:1936 Ph:206-772-2221 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. • * MetroScan / King :--- * Owner :Rankin John R & Patr:_ __t R Et Pars__ # :783980 0030 09 'Site :306 Morris Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date :05/01/89 Mail :423 S 3rd St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$115, 000 Use :111 Res,Apartment,5 To 9 Units Asd.V :$142,200 Lgl :BLK 34 LOT 5-6 SMITHERS 2ND ADD TO Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:1 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:2 BldgSF:4, 917 Ac: .12 YB:1920 Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Chick Stephen P & Abby P Parcel # : 182305 9060 06 Site :618 Smithers Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date : 11/24/93 Mail :618 Smithers Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$94,500 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$71,100 Lgl :STR 182305 TAXLOT 60 W 91 FT OF Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H: 1/ / Stories:1.5 BldgSF:1,250 Ac: . 10 YB:1900 Ph:425-255-4102 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Blackwell Beverly Ann Parcel # :784180 0090 02 Site :215 Whitworth Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date : 07/11/96 Mail :215 Whitworth Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$180, 000 Full Use :101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$190,200 Lgl :BLK 4 LOT 1-2-3 SMITHERS 6TH ADD Q:SE S:18 T:23N R: 05E Bedrm:3 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:1.5 BldgSF:2,670 Ac: .31 YB:1930 Ph: * MetroScan / King Owner :First Ch Of Christ Scient Parcel # :784180 0135 09 Site :216 Whitworth Ave S Renton 98055 Sale Date Mail :220 Whitworth Ave S #01134- Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price Use :407 Pub,Church,Religious Services Asd.V :$339,500 Lgl :BLK 5 LOT 1-2-3 SMITHERS 6TH ADD Q:SE S:18 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:4,315 Ac: .24 YB:1934 Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Schroeder Linda Parcel # :150800 0230 07 Site :4002 S 158th St #23 Tukwila 98188 Sale Date :04/29/91 Mail :4012 S 158th St #F Tukwila Wa 98188 Sale Price :$70, 000 Full Use :123 Res,Condominium,50 To 99 Units Asd.V :$67, 000 Lgl :BLK BLD 3 LOT UNIT 23 CHALET SOUTH Q:SW S:22 T:23N R: 04E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H: 1/ /1 Stories:2 BldgSF:966 Ac:5.27 YB:1979 Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Christenson D M & C E Parcel # :150800 0240 05 Site :4002 S 158th St #24 Tukwila 98188 Sale Date Mail :4012 S 158th St #G Seattle Wa 98188 Sale Price Use :123 Res,Condominium,50 To 99 Units Asd.V :$67, 000 Lgl :BLK BLD 3 LOT UNIT 24 CHALET SOUTH Q:SW S:22 T:23N R:04E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:2 BldgSF:966 Ac:5.27 YB:1979 Ph: * MetroScan / King * Owner :Hudson Melanie L Parcel # :150800 0250 02 Site :4002 S 158th St #25 Tukwila 98188 Sale Date :11/30/92 Mail :4012 S 158th St #H Seattle Wa 98188 Sale Price :$69, 950 Full Use :123 Res,Condominium,50 To 99 Units Asd.V :$67, 000 Lgl :BLK BLD 3 LOT UNIT 25 CHALET SOUTH Q:SW S:22 T:23N R:04E Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ /1 Stories:2 BldgSF:966 Ac:5.27 YB:1979 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. ' PERFECTION TIRE PARTNERSHIP 2 BIG FIVE HOLDINGS INC WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR CHILD • 602E 2nd Ave 2525 E El Segundo Blvd PO Box 88948 Spokane, WA 99202 El Segundo, CA 90245 Seattle, WA 98138 RENTON LUTHERAN CHURCH RENTON LUTHERAN CHURCH Mary Ann Putman 200 Whitworth Ave S#01143- 200 Whitworth Ave S#01143- 505 S 2nd Vac St Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 , Rev\ Wye\ `1 BOSS • M Hadi Fakharzadeh Vera Jean Mathews Vera Jean Mathews PO Box 78404 10415 SE 174th St#5268 10415 SE 174th St#5268 Seattle, WA 98178 Renton,WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Thomas Williams SCI MANAGEMENT CORP Linda Christine Crosby&Rand/Carman 13329 SE 253rd P1 1929 Allen Pkwy 2601 NE 23rd Kent, WA 98042 Houston,TX 77019 Renton, WA 98055 SALVATION ARMY Civic Theatre Renton Curtis&Shelley Olosky PO Box 9219 PO Box 1556 504 S 3rd St Seattle,WA 98109 Renton, WA 98057 Renton, WA 98055 Rest-Inc Sunlite BIG FIVE HOLDINGS INC SUNLITE RESTAURANT INC 509 S 3rd St 2525 E El Segundo Blvd 509 S 3rd St Renton, WA 98055 El Segundo, CA 90245 Renton, WA 98055 CITY OF RENTON Mary Jane LaJoy CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Ave S 13784 Marchant Ave 200 Mill Ave S • Renton,WA 98055 Sylmar, CA 91342 . Renton,WA 98055 • CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Ave S 233 Burnett Ave S 200 Mill Ave S • Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 • John&Emily Adams Elizabeth Picini CITY OF RENTON 7548 S Sunnycrest Rd 1813 NW 77th St 233 Burnett Ave S Seattle, WA 98178 Seattle, WA 98117 Renton, WA 98055 CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON MUTUAL SVGS BK Lorraine Jasper 233 Burnett Ave S 1191 2nd Ave#950 30925 Webster Rd E Renton, WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98101 Eatonville, WA 98328 PERFECTION TIRE PARTNERSHIP CITY OF RENTON RENTON LUTHERAN CHURCH 205 Logan Ave S 200 Mill Ave S 200 Whitworth Ave S#01143- Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 • CITY OF RENTON Timothy Searing Stanley Fernyhough 200 Mill Ave S 211 Morris Ave S 10008 Rainier Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98178 John&Patricia Rankin Stephen&Abby Chick Beverly Ann Blackwell 423 S 3rd St 618 Smithers Ave S 215 Whitworth Ave S Renton,WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 FIRST CH OF CHRIST SCIENT Linda Schroeder D M&C E Christenson 220 Whitworth Ave S#01134- 4012 S 158th St#F 4012 S 158th St#G Renton, WA 98055 Tukwila,WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98188 Melanie Hudson 4012 S 158th St#H Seattle, WA 98188 �I , • �, DEVELOPMENT PLANNING II -\, CITY OF RENTON la \ OCT 2 c 1997 • NE.,41 .-ECEIVEs DALLY HOMES INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM Exceptions(Quality-Timeless VTh,e' Date: October 16, 1997 To: City of Renton From: Charlie Laboda Re: Renton 100- Construction Mitigation Description: • Proposed Construction Dates: Construction Permit is anticipated in April of 1998 with a construction completion of April 1999. • Hours of Operation: Per City of Renton requirements. 7am- 6pm Monday -Friday. • Proposed hauling/transportation routes: Interstate 405 -Rainier Avenue - Morris and Logan to site. • Measures to be implemented to minimize dust,traffic and transportation impacts, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics. Dust will be controlled by wetting down the site as required. Traffic will be controlled with flaggers as required and transportation will be controlled by using approved routes. Mud will be controlled by utilizing approved Erosion Control measures and by cleaning truck tires or cleaning the street as necessary. Noise will be mitigated by muffling equipment as required per standard construction standards and other noxious characteristics will be controlled using best construction practices. 3316 FUHRMAN AVE.E. • SUITE 100 • SEATTLE,WA 98102 • (206)328-3770 • FAX 328-6909 • #DALLYHI120L7 f� recycled paper • • I • 'SY Oa %N f� a NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS • DATE:OCTOBER 17,1997 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: Renton 100 Apartments LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF . DESCRIPTION: The applicant,Daily Homes,seeks a proposal fore 4 story,mixed-use building ' In downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Avenue S.(appmx 4.810 s.f.),a ground floor parking garage(145 parking stalls),and 110 multi-family residential units on the 3 upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage end commercial space is broken into 3 attached building wings oriented around 2 landscaped courts.The average height of the building at parapets Is approximately 50 feet, with the highest point of the building about 81 feet above grade. The main entrance to the parking garage(intended for residents)would be from the Seattle Pipeline right-of-way accessed off Logan Ave.S.or Morris Ave.S.A secondary entrance Is proposed from the alley at the northwest corner of the • building.There is a street-level main entry to a lobby and the residential portion • of the building at the southeast corner of the property on Logan Ave.S. Tho commercial space may be divided Into Individual leasable spaces with separate r entrances from Logan Avenue S. • • GENERAL LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S.,City block between Logan Avenue S.and Morris Avenue • S.and between S.3rd Street and S.2nd Street STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: GeoleUrnlcal Study,Drainage Study PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit • Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 6:00 PM on December 1,1997.This matter Is also ' scheduled for a public hearing on December 9,1997 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building, • • , 200 Mill Ave.South.If you are interested In attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division, • 277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled.If comments cannot be submitted In writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear al the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Heedng Examiner.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional informallon by mall,contact Peter Rosen,Project Manager,at 235-2719.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. • PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: October 16,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 17,1997 • DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: October 17,1997 • • • • • GENMALOT.D00 • CERTIFICATION • I, /r-rr MR/Ai/P . hereby certify that /0 copies of the above document were posted by me in !D conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . 66-naerz(7,/417 • • Signed: •• . ` y� J/�� L • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) �^�, = • • • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _r/) .l��! � and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses ." ttq�.�s��ned this instrument n g ..;�= .®4 '..purposes mentioned in the instrument. T1' , µ•1"I`' dat'�'d: COO L �.d, l�i�i`) -b• Not Publ. in and for the Stale of ington Ail9.0C/ • ^` 1. `28- - Notary (Print) L YN KAMCHFFF • ,� or.. L,,: • My appointment a ,,} "'.A.• =:1 . • •N•ofARY,DOc • . Oft l'PLNNTo� NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: OCTOBER 17, 1997 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: Renton 100 Apartments LUA-97-155,SA-H,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Daily Homes,seeks a proposal for a 4 story, mixed-use building in downtown Renton containing ground floor commercial space facing Logan Avenue S. (approx. 4,610 s.f.), a ground floor parking garage (145 parking stalls),and 110 multi-family residential units on the 3 upper levels(93,398 s.f.). The residential portion of the building over the parking garage and commercial space is broken into 3 attached building wings oriented around 2 landscaped courts. The average height of the building at parapets is approximately 50 feet, with the highest point of the building about 61 feet above grade. The main entrance to the parking garage(intended for residents)would be from the Seattle Pipeline right-of-way accessed off Logan Ave.S.or Morris Ave.S. A secondary entrance is proposed from the alley at the northwest corner of the building. There is a street-level main entry to a lobby and the residential portion of the building at the southeast corner of the property on Logan Ave. S. The commercial space may be divided into individual leasable spaces with separate entrances from Logan Avenue S. GENERAL LOCATION: 255 Logan Avenue S.,City block between Logan Avenue S.and Morris Avenue S.and between S.3rd Street and S.2nd Street STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: Geotechnical Study,Drainage Study PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 1,1997. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on December 9,1997 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave.South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division, 277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Peter Rosen,Project Manager,at 235-2719. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: October 16,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 17,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: October 17,1997 GENMALOT.DOC .2 y1• ti�.it. `.SO - / .a a•> :r U - • .6f a a�, AS• t;1• C��T .r 1 ,cCol 6/+1 � i• .� �'. tea, 0 77 j m! 1 O 'e 2/,� .61: Z as 2I '6t —1 .•.r z1. p '6e? I a/. ,C,P. • • y 1 041. 35P o L y 02 eP °Iris //. 07,':• U .N• II .m = 4P� s l //. a. co ti0y£I•N ' Z14`• r' 9•• i :f2 °' £G`rO °• ° -,I• „ P • OJ • t .ue• . d - 9 d et,. G i •at fti•,rr •0/.r •!Z}t:.r• 5,d•p, d, I/Z)e O SS:d• o/> I c.°. O O/• yr M.[/.0 .. 1C1t °J f/ tr-.< 4 �,�r {; O, i�,'O n a• _ •�/ o �: k' r.+_!•S:•1 La I S q , .1 . .a c v S• a 8.t..••a•' ) LQ,1 6' .22°4:,. t+11 0 6' :2 .O :":0 6, r r-----' a!IE L p .a r N < i OB[O[I a '`t�f ,• •> •23 •6••In, •_ g 37tl'ld j° N a1t V 9Z iv I^ ,•�-.£2 rr° c�ri 9. ` 'G2 clO 5'.•• 9... ° a� • •E • •° ' '21•. II . P.. 8 i . - I %. i O 0, E' t r.e•' ,/.+ t .N• S°. I.4Z 'r 5 r•'• B 1[2.btiu u I 9. •y .,o tj6C �.�.��` ® ° .0 �''t 4 cia. I cr, U , a 2 _s_.m i IV '1 d s�•i;•° ', IZ� ...sr • {-= ;n e, t dZ o 4 .,, h.` aisle" 0 v !• " L o Yz n. ,•1 „ •v 1 0.? 0 k i� . ..o yw; 3 6 / rye .,> t = a. , i 1'' cr ! ..Att.r. -". 1 ya rr rr DP Or.-r• r1 '1 rs. i' 'i U. 0 • - • u I. ..,...•y •' .r.r :-.v v. r 6'Or - .9/•au + �;�� rlf�� SPe•••a., •pat••r id••••-w x. r'y'. • y r, w oo re •• •• a •a a° ° OI or Z �• �n•o t a• ' I' °' •'' 1 .•• S`'•j w[•.1 r,.•' �'•••�°� F/•• •• '/•"' S•�.• .r:fr ♦ O1 S°,r Q! Q e._.•>v. JII o' . • ha a • t g' `I' 11. t/t� qq mo •1 T o" ,-. . ii ra o''av,ie. --`,7 --it o •a •a • N i i' 4a B'�nl�+.nl'I�l'°sFlt�O,a. .. "o'' o7.• • l 21 I O -V •r, w, 1 4 /'I 2 C * S •1 .r x ' 2� £• .L•''w.r'w••) : Z • -' 9 • I ,.° I-.,• I'.. •).Yditr•lrr • •r f'h '•Y or oI i f� ul ".r •t • ..•r / 2 e�,• :: I:• .•/. I. _/r.so a£ .'S �•, Cr'r7 N '• �—' ' • , + I e..a. (�.w,.y. 1: a- C'rr..v/. .. • ... 1S k IS 2, ollrc o,) OIIIIS/11..4t • //fi��i� �#�Of% y f/ --�1 .r1•r .-- wT Sa O. f 2 II a .r 6+ 8 L 9 -•9 t• •r•r 1a �% ;S t ' /T,/-1� !f A,I1166 ll• .Z "`� •/ • y,• •4a''•' cam- • ,0 1• a`,. 6tII I 4,1 �, I O^4OS'•s .Z1C7 ,fi 6�' ) e ' 9r se'.a d `s o• :o'h� 9=•r o� _/`� • ° ° �o'` •�t i°' C ��'o l,' ®.a 1£I�0,•=1 . O P 2 , • f/a,4i 0.1i, 9• ?t Lt• I[ 2; I > r",. - - 1• Z • n .r °:I' .'.. 6. 1, rr..1L •. tt�If ° G • 'PI '� J. : •>S/,•a1F'4 L ✓�° ^ 7Z r,' 1 p°I°l r� Q1 k••- .:. v�L � .p ti �i ..•'' • /'7 •r*r 'r - '/i 6dd 4 O f.9/ y£/k�� _ y,1• i ' ' i.0iteo . .>a C 8 4' • .�V°•0 t. • ylrfi. 9 b •S J 9 . 1 wp r. 5;°;dr •V •.o `''" ti._ o„ , t• a •�� "la °a "•��r F r>, -ZZ I %® 11 „.f.+ /, n / �.' .1,.`` 3N/7 \ gv'.' M •® •v•,i �81�) P' S • •?/h4 1 h+ S• 4. •ro ,� 2w7Q••!tr= ii^;2•-_:.>\.. t .,,a t` ® y \r 1 0°Qi • /' ••:.\± e .(f/r•r4+ Or•6�s' ya}'kw Y.1 . \b >: d/d 1 .>,�• :r',1 .a'0 1d[' llorp r��-q a 1 i.e. i:it b,' ;ff,'.�y .9• > •• s.atr(� :s,.rO1Da. • 11"7/S/!I /a• i O o• °I a y' , ° a. r, °, > m ::6.;,^..w'.'I�' Ig•L�<Jar aa�. b��J. •s. o el ia. aY £ •C L Ry ` N 11= loft •y •.... .r I••a�z• : u :��''\� 5t ' e' .L ,aP 14 a ,�v�."�. if., ��G e,laira _ 3S •uo 1 • 1` • I. ell a. ( r. I o7 •OZ>?> .. ,/a r o ! ./ r•.>• 6 • '°• ♦ LSs ,E I Z 0 /, s w •vt ' ° __ 02 ` ra r Mlf-Ib-fi011 IN2 'S nil-/>.i/.•• <./ �._.c•�( 1 _ �>a[! i • ' �j/ `7;�7 I. .- ZC—°NYJJ4 r i_ !•� I''1/-1 • v.°. 'a.a.;11•i•• as L>! •f. - -•, �`�.�} .•r_a `/ ••I_(� "1\J ' IJ .l- 4°�fd ol; ` w°r °°10 1..I •w 1° e �^ - • '• C. J - . . t1• 6: P\. • Z •z i,• • ----Ti • t • ut [A O I • • • '� • I `Isr�l J: i Ira-I Li/j, .°- .. \= r ' •1 - .., 1 ;I• 'r`7 •[• . ° silo E.1'J l.'F` •o,.l,'s ...• . 1 - . -- f• '0- °°^r1• •`. -•. ` N .hy°,_\y...FF'., p,[. • - - vi • 21 \ .::. 'L u 7.� oD,er'.6. , -[,lrin• I CS6tf j { \ ° ti • >° 1 .1 d.; .I•°` °ltta 1. 077Q. Z w 9�Irw •�• •• 1' \b V '•�. 4 I '�.r,1111 1,•.�°L N ,a. Tr"r f •, •""J: • � w i. •: 1, :1,5$T.•.Oa TI ,.., r:'•wi' • •.v•v.11.1 m t: '1 fn�• y: U. -a 't h •o?c4'a. p1± ' ? 1f2_ D �.ay ' 1' to ry• 51 p a,,. :0 �, _ $y$ � i.t g o9. 2 -( � ..-__._ Ot Ir T alii•h •+.•+1• Jr----to; 1 . Ir • �''l®•• a aaar� ;,....,, ,.. _ _ ___ _ -- 0...n. to ,, -. I. ' ..y.v, w ..rf�°, } Iu !aw ....r.IL 1 , w I 'r /. ••t ..at I ,, • • OF::RENT.ON 4, N` 1` Works De artmeri•B- il- -iri' -•Pub is t:.LL` nir u d�Pla n g g 1?. Zimm P.E.,ermanAdministrator °'Jesse Tanner,Mayor'. . • . . . ... . . - . . ,.. .... - , . gg . . • October 17, 1997 : Charlie Laboda ' Dally Homes, Inc. 3316 FuhrmanAvenue East,#100 Seattle,WA 98102 - ' SUBJECT: Renton 100 Apartments • _ LUA97-155,SA-H,ECF Dear Mr. Laboda: ' ::The 'Development Planning •.Section of the City of Renton ;has;determined that the - -: :.•subject application is ,completeaccording to submittal requirements and, therefore,''is :accepted.for review. 'Si scheduled for consideration:by'the'Environmental-Review Committee on Prior to that .!review, ',you ;will be _notified if any 'additional. :... � - - November.:.11, 1997. :• information is required to continue'processing your'application: := '• The date of Tuesday,'_December'9, 1997'at 9:00 AM, has been set for a public hearing to review the above-referenced matter. The hearing,before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton _ Hearing Examiner,will'be held.in.the Council Chambers onth e.second floor of City Hall, -• Renton, Washington: The applicant or representative-of the applicant is required to be present at the public_hearing. A copy ofthestaff report will be mailed to you one week • before the hearing. Please contact me, at`235-2729, if you'have any questions.' eter Rose Project Manager • _ iica�n.R:ooc°. • '200-Mill Avenue South=.Renton,Washin ton;98055, - \ ': :i:: .0 ...........::::..............................:..::::::::.................:.::.::::.......................:..............CITYO ................. ::....... .......: :::. ::::::... .................:::. :::.. :::.:::.�.: . �.�-�� :' . � ..: ::::::::....: ..... > SER C S D :;:::::::.;;::»:;:<:::<::<:>::>::>::::;::<::<:::::::::::::>:<:»::::::>:•:::»::;::::.»<>::;;::: :.:;>::;:<::>::>:>:>:.. :: ENT.��.<s<. ...I. .E .. .IV1.SI.Q1V ...... ::::::::::::::::::::.....::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::.>-::..:::;;:<:;.>>:.;>::>>:::::: ROPERTY..O.WN.ER ................... INFORMATION�:::::<:::::;>:::: ::: :�::;::>:::;�:>:::»:: gii miimi ;Note:::;If;theris;;more than;one legal owner:please attach ar additional: notg-.-igVlaster-rAppiicatioa.:4:each::o iif i PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: (� ®'� 42--e/vvtD. V,e r t I v k 106 i4 jiW k 'cvt fs • PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: I Y lor�IS fLoa►A5e4ff It- t/fa'fr/rD f• CITY: • ZIP: KItGV40IY'ASSESOR'S ACCO T NUMBER(S): • • • 1 14'1?50 -- o'3S 0O 5C29( c'o - vo10 -062 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): • ...........:..........................::;:.:NTRISi•.::::o th e.r.::ih:a n::own.e:r..f:.:::::l .::::.::::. PROPOSED LAND USES: • NAME: D'^ I I ` Uvv ti /te,tij/fil, in . IIIOMPANY applicable):(if a : EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: PP ) _ C a (tom L4b04((- o C ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): 33 ((Ji ?u h v mar /'vt I op CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: OD Se4t, -(-e- W A- '1 1° - r�q _ y!/► , ,, _ off, "? TE PHONE NUMBER: ��5 C,),‘, OCe 3.? ?— J-71 f-� PROPOSED (ifapplicable): ZONING 11:/ SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): p {� le2/1/1/.' No A�7lis9 • 't.6 1 1(4 e--' (V'g""I/I V VI ::, � [ l� bai,o(i(L. 5`3q(e. stP - ®c� , 6 1997 COMPANY/� (if aipplicable): • 0 _ , PROJECT VALUE:-7 . • 04 I l t v I !1 ffrf i ( (OOO i OOOD STY QENT PLANNING F RENTON ADDRESS: • IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER.PROTECTION AREA? ( (i -OA ki/(0/1C(/1-N. I1/4-re I/kt (Ct) Ati f\_ NO 110TY: ZIP: e Wit 1j3(/� IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY(�(/� I (J V SENSITIVE AREA? TE -PHONE NUMBER: i\isV Le) '-;27- 3116 . • J ''f • ' A - .......... ....................... ..... ,.... .......:.......... .......:... .�:>::::;:..:i::s::<::::i:%:::::ii::s;;:;��;�;:_::;:;`:.:>.�:i:<:��>!!,::::'::ii::;i::::t:i:.:;�:::..:.. #::. ::>�:>:::::>:<:>::::::><:::::::;::>:<:: : ::LEGaL�:DESGRI • ;::>PROP.ERTY:>:. A,t. .......: .se .ar. sh .................. • S AT-rPrGi-t dip. • • :_;.>F APPPLI ATION<`& FEES <` >'<<> ><:< > ; > ` >:>;>.< »:>:::; :>::::>>» <> <>Cie:cK.a j a: .cat10 rcTty:' e t o .a ;f, ` C t s aff::v i ll<detorin nfee<: s '` gigE ><<: • _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: • _ COMP.. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ —SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ ' _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ C DITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ ITE PLAN APPROVAL $�QD�•� _ FINAL PLAT $ ".5 )Itti _ RADE & FILL PERMIT $ • (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ — VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY • _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION — MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ • BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: - _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ —VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge XENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $5Da vo REVISION $ :�::>�::::>::::A1=.FI DAVIT:>:0.1= O:W N E R.SHI..................................................................................................... I, (Print Name) (/Y`&/i'Ile_ ( /1J declare that I am(please check one) the owner of the property involved in this application,_.\_/le authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Dk \` 4. r 1,01o " " — [IA ' I P ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public,in and eiha r l(e_ LA 10 h, V 1 (A)1 for the State of residing at (Na e of Owner/Re esentati ) , on the_day of • 19 gnature of Ownr/Represe ti e) (Signature of Notary Public) :::::::::><::>:::>::::::::>::;>::::::<:»:::>:>:::�::>::::>::::�:>:>>::::::_<:::>:::<:::::»:<:::>�:>::><::>:<:::::>: s sec co to b CI �-•� . :::; ;:: .;:.:;:.;:.:<.:<:::C�t....F I.e:.:N.umbee:::>:: :.; .> :Y ::> >::.:::::::::.::.:: :::: ..R.....S.HPL......Cll..... .....P................. .. :5::» :•AAD ;:.:.:: . •• .SM•>:SiVI•E: HBS A• •.CP ;OVIDED «$;`'s` '` <`>:::: >:> ` < <>;>` .''.'n : << '.: : > <:<: >:::><:<:>:::<:>>::::::. 7 L ..EES ::$ � .. :.::..; . OTAL PO.STAGE:PBO....I. E . ..... .......,. MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96 ,j�5571: _ �J„C �• � LEGAL DESCRIP ION PARCEL A: LOTS 6 1 '1, BLOCK 1, 5MITHER'5 SIXTH ADDITION TO THE TOuN GF RENTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 26 OF PLATS, PAGE 41, IN KNG COUNTY, WASNNGTON. TOGET}-IER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE ALLEY ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 6 VACATED BY CITY OF RENTON ORDNANCE NUMBER 2115, WHICH ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW. PARCEL C: LOTS 2 THROUGH 5, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 1, MOTOR LINE ADDITION TO FENTON, ACCORDING TO HE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED rsi VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, IN KING COUNTY, WASHNGTON_ CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: October 16, 1997 TO: Peter Rosen,Project Manager Development Services Division /..16 FROM: Jay Covington Executive Assistant to the Mayor SUBJECT: DALLY HOMES LAND USE APPLICATION This memo serves as authorization for Daily Homes/KTH Architects to submit a land use application to the City of Renton for city owned property located at 255 Logan Avenue South. cc: Sue Carlson K T H ARCHITECTS 13400 Northup Way East, Suite 30 Bellevue, WA 98005 Tel: (425) 401-6828 Fax: (425) 401-0630 October 15, 1997 RENTON 100 APARTMENTS SITE PLAN APPROVAL SUBMITTAL PROJECT NARRATIVE The site is an irregularly shaped lot at the North side of downtown Renton. The subject property consists of two parcels with the total area of 53,963 square feet. The site is located in the city block as defined by Logan Avenue S., S 3rd Street,Morris Avenue S. and S. 2nd Street. Within this block the site abuts Morris Avenue S. on the West and Logan Avenue S. on the East. On the South, the property is adjacent to the Seattle Pipeline right-of-way and a shallow landstrip which will be owned by City of Renton. On the North, the site is bounded by an alley and a commercial property. Currently, the site is vacated and covered with asphalt, concrete and gravel. The northern and western portions of the property were being used for temporary storage of automobiles. The southeastern corner of the site was asphalt paved and had been used in the past for as automobile lot. There are no special site features. The ground is relatively flat with the general slope of about 1% slope from the East to the West. There are existing commercial and residential buildings in the vicinity of the property. On the North, along Morris Avenue S.&the alley, there is an older single family home and a detached garage. Also North of the property, along Logan Avenue S,. a commercial building houses a tire dealership. South of Seattle Pipeline right-of-way, there are older commercial and retail buildings situated. The proposed project is named RENTON 100 APARTMENTS. The structure itself is a 4 story, mixed use building, containing ground floor parking garage, ground floor commercial space and residential units on the three upper levels. The parking garage contains 145 parking stalls, with a main entrance from the Seattle Pipeline right-of-way at the south. A secondary entrance from the alley, on the North side, is structurally blocked out as an emergency and move-in entrance. RECEIVED OCT 1 6 1997 C1097 20.doc DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON .• I Facing Logan Avenue S., an approximately 30 feet wide, 4,610 square feet commercial area is proposed for retail use. The area may be divided into individual leasable spaces with separate entrances from Logan Avenue. S. The main entrance to the residential portion of the building is located at the southeast corner of the property at ground / street level. Over the garage and retail space ceiling/floor, there are 3 attached building wings. These wings, named building A, B & C, each contain three levels of residential floors. The apartment units are flats, ranging from studios to 2 bedroom, 2 bath, with the emphasis on studios and 1 bedroom, 1 bath units. Total number of units: 110. Directly above the parking garage, at the first residential level there are two landscaped courts, Court 1 and Court 2. They are open to the South and enclosed, by the building wings, on the other sides. _ Total lot coverage on ground level is 90.5 %. Total residential floor area, including common areas: 93,398 square feet. Average height of building at parapets is approx. 50 feet above highest adjacent sidewalk. Highest point of building at stair/elevator penthouse roof is about 61 feet above grade. Proposed improvements by Dally Homes Inc. include alley surfacing at North, undulating, masonry planters, masonry columns and wood trellises along the West and South side of the proposed building. Note: Additional off-site developments and improvements shown on the Site Plan are for information only. They are neither part of this proposal nor the responsibility of Dally Homes Inc. Sincerely, KTH ' CHITECTS 4/11i-A7,V Scott I •rkey Princi i .1 C1097_20.doc 2 J• s • :1\ - G E O T E C H 13256 NE 20th Street,Suite 16 P.O.Box 2054 Bellevue,WA 98005 Tacoma,WA 98401 CONSULTANTS, INC. 206-747-5618 FAX 747-8561 206-627-5990 FAX 627-2114 August 26, 1997 JN 97281 Daily Homes 3316 Fuhrman Avenue, Suite 100 Seattle, Washington 98102 Attention: Charlie Laboda Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Mixed-Use Building 2XX Logan Avenue South Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Laboda: We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the proposed mixed-use building to be constructed in Renton, Washington. The scope of our work consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork and design criteria for foundations, retaining walls, and pavements. You authorized our work by accepting our proposal, P-4293, dated August 6, 1997. The subsurface conditions of the proposed building site were explored with four test borings that encountered loose fill and alluvial soils overlying dense, gravelly sands. Due to the potential for unacceptable settlement if conventional foundations were to be used, we recommend that the building loads be carried on deep foundations. On-grade slabs can be used, but should be reinforced with steel bars to reduce cracking due to differential settlement. Pavement sections should be supported over imported, gravelly structural fill. The on-site soils will not be useable for structural fill, including utility backfill. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report or if we can be of further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Associate 007- MRM:alt �F�OA 8 Z^997- c/ry �F�r ocRe1'ro�41/,yc GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY , Proposed Mixed-Use Building 2XX Logan Avenue South Renton, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed mixed-use building in Renton. The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. We were provided with a conceptual site plan and a lot map. These plans showed the property dimensions and a potential layout for the building. Based on the provided. plans, and on discussions with Charlie Laboda of Daily Homes, we anticipate that the site development could consist of a large structure containing four floors of apartment units over a main floor occupied by retail space and a parking garage. The main floor would be close to the existing site grades, with no basement planned for the development. On-grade parking will be provided in the Seattle pipeline right-of-way that abuts the southern boundary of the site. It appears that some street improvements may be made in Logan Avenue South. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The site is a relatively large, irregularly-shaped parcel situated on the northern portion of downtown Renton. The provided lot map indicates that the property consists of at least two lots. Morris Avenue South and Logan Avenue South abut the west and east sides of the property, respectively. The angled southern boundary of the site adjoins a Seattle pipeline right-of-way. The ground surface on the property is relatively flat, with an apparent slight grade down toward the south. At the time of our explorations the site was covered with asphalt, concrete, and gravel. The northern and western portions of the property were being used for temporary storage of automobiles. The southeastern corner of the site was asphalt-paved and had apparently been used in the past for an automobile lot. A small, wood frame building that had been used by a past dealership was still present in this area. Much of the site was surrounded by chain link fences. Existing development in the vicinity of the site is a combination of commercial and residential. The area south of the site is paved for parking within the Seattle pipeline right-of-way. South of this are older commercial and retail buildings. Immediately north of the western two-thirds of the property is an older single-family home and a detached garage. Within several feet of the north boundary of the eastern one-third of the site is a commercial building that contains a tire dealership. The surrounding commercial and retail buildings are primarily of concrete masonry (CMU) construction. We observed indications of significant differential settlement in several of the neighboring buildings. This was most obvious in the structures situated south of the pipeline right-of-way, where we observed several large cracks extending the full height of the building walls. Subsurface The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling four test borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration program was based upon the proposed construction and required design criteria, the site topography and access, the subsurface GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Daily Homes JN 97281 August 26, 1997 Page 2 • • conditions revealed during drilling, the scope of work outlined in our proposal, and on time and budget constraints. The borings were drilled on August 12 and 13, 1997, using a truck-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill. Samples were taken at 5-foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split-spoon sampler, which has a 2-inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the drilling process, logged the test borings, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. The Test Boring Logs are attached as Plates 3 through 6. The four borings encountered 11 to approximately 25 feet of loose, sandy silt and silty sand below the surface cover of gravel or asphalt. These upper soils appear to be a combination of fill and alluvium (river deposits). The geologic maps for Renton indicate that much of the area in the site vicinity has been modified by past grading activities. River channels have meandered through various portions of Renton since the last glaciers receded. Boring 2 encountered a log in the alluvium at a depth of approximately 22 feet. Beneath the alluvium and fill, the borings found dense sand containing varying amounts of gravel. These sands were revealed to the bottom of the borings. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual, transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test boring logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during drilling. Groundwater Groundwater seepage was observed at a depth of 8 to 18 feet. The test borings were left open for only a short time period. Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage and may not indicate the static groundwater level. It should be noted that •groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General It is our opinion that the proposed development is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The test borings conducted on the site encountered loose fill and alluvium overlying dense sands. The loose soils are compressible and are potentially liquefiable below the water table. To prevent unacceptable foundation settlement under static building loads, and in the event of a moderate to large earthquake, we recommend that the building be supported on deep foundations embedded into the dense sands. Due to the presence of potentially caving near- surface soils and groundwater, it appears that augercast piers are the most suitable deep foundation option. Vibrations from driven piling could potentially damage surrounding structures. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. • Daily Homes JN 97281 August 26, 1997 Page 3 Ground improvements methods, such as dynamic compaction or gravel columns, do not appear feasible for this project. If some differential settlement is allowable in the lowest floor, which will be used primarily for parking, a slab-on-grade could be used. This slab should be reinforced with steel bars to limit the potential for excessive cracking. Number 4 rebar at 18-inch centers both way in the slab are typically sufficient. Wherever possible, the slab should be isolated from the pier-supported walls and columns. An exception to this is where interior and exterior slabs lead up to doorways. At these locations the slab's reinforcement should be tied in to the pier-supported foundation. This lessens the chance that a sharp downset (i.e. trip hazard) will form at the door threshold. Areas of soft subgrade soils should be excavated beneath slabs and replaced with structural fill. As evidenced by the settlement and relatively poor performance of many pavements in the surrounding area, the near-surface loose soils do not provide good subgrade support. Gravelly structural fill should be provided beneath pavement sections to improve their performance. The near-surface soils are generally silts, which are unsuitable for reuse as structural fill due to their sensitivity to moisture. Utility backfill and other structural fill will need to be imported in order for proper compaction to be achieved. The moisture-sensitive soils will be susceptible to disturbance under equipment and foot traffic, particularly when they are wet. Quarry spalls or a similar gravelly material should be used to construct access roads and working pads where heavy equipment traffic is expected. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. Augercast Concrete Piers Augercast piers are installed using continuous flight, hollow-stem auger equipment. Concrete grout must be pumped continuously through the auger as it is withdrawn. We recommend that augercast piers be installed by an experienced contractor who is familiar with the anticipated subsurface conditions. An allowable compressive capacity of 50 tons can be attained by installing a 16-inch diameter, augercast concrete pier at least 10 feet into dense strata. For transient loading, such as wind or seismic loads, the allowable pier capacity may be increased by one-third. We can provide design criteria for different pier diameters and embedment lengths, if greater capacities are required. The minimum center-to-center pier spacing should be three times the pier diameter. Based on our test boring information, we estimate that pier lengths of about 25 to 40 feet will be required to achieve adequate penetration into the bearing soil. We estimate that the total settlement of single piers installed as described above will be on the order of one-half inch. Most of this settlement should occur during the construction phase as the dead loads are applied. The remaining post-construction settlement would be realized as the live- GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. • Daily Homes JN 97281 August 26, 1997 Page 4 loads are applied. We estimate that differential settlements over any portion of the structure should be less than about one-quarter inch. "We recommend reinforcing each pier its entire length. This typically consists of a rebar cage extending a portion of the pier's length with a full-length center bar. Each pier can be assumed to have a point of fixity at 10 feet below the ground surface for the computation of lateral load resistance. The loose soil against the piers can be assumed to have a design passive ,earth resistance of 100 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) acting on two times the pier diameter. This relatively low passive pressure is intended to account for the potential that some soil liquefaction could occur adjacent to piers during an earthquake. Passive earth pressures on the grade beams will also provide some lateral resistance. If structural fill is placed against the outside of the grade beams, the design passive earth pressure from the fill can be assumed to be equal to that pressure exerted by an equivalent fluid with a density of 200 pcf. Seismic Considerations The site is located within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No. 16-2 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1994 UBC, the site soil profile is best represented by Profile Type S3. The loose soils beneath the water table are susceptible to seismic liquefaction during a moderate to large earthquake. On-grade .elements, such as slabs and pavements, would likely undergo significant differential settlement where liquefaction occurs. The use of deep foundations to support the building should prevent catastrophic foundation settlement that could result from seismic liquefaction. Slabs-on-Grade The subgrade soil beneath on-grade slabs must be in a firm, non-yielding condition at the time of slab construction or underslab fill placement. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with select, imported, structural fill. The use of reinforcing steel is recommended to reduce the potential for differential slab settlement and cracking. All slabs-on-grade should be underlain by a capillary break or .drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4-inch thickness of coarse, free-draining, structural fill with a gradation similar to that discussed later in Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls. In areas where the passage of moisture through the slab is undesirable, a vapor barrier, such as a 6-mil plastic membrane, should be placed beneath the slab. Additionally, sand could be used in the fine-grading process to reduce damage to the vapor barrier, to provide uniform support under the slab, and to reduce shrinkage cracking by improving the concrete curing process. Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended design parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. • Daily Homes JN 97281 August 26, 1997 Page 5 Parameter Design Value Active Earth Pressure* 40 pcf Soil Unit Weight 130 pcf Where: 1. pcf is pounds per cubic foot. 2. Active earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid densities. * For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times its height, a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. The passive pressure given is appropriate for the depth of level, structural fill placed in front of a retaining or foundation wall only. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads, such as vehicles, will be placed behind the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well-compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand-operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining, structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. The near-surface soils are not free-draining. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also • slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. ' I Daily Homes JN 97281 August 26, 1997 Page 6 the backfill. The sub-section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof the below-grade walls. If some seepage through the walls or moist conditions are not acceptable, damp-proofing or waterproofing should be provided. This could include limiting cold joints and wall penetrations, and possibly using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion is not considered waterproofing, but it will only help to prevent moisture, generated from water vapor or capillary action, from seeping through the concrete. Excavations and Slopes Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, if there are no indications of slope instability. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the soil type above the groundwater table would be classified as Type. C. Therefore, temporary cut slopes cannot be excavated at an inclination steeper than 1.5:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the bottom of a cut. Temporary excavations that encounter caving soils or seepage will need to be shored and may require dewatering. The above recommended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites with similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow.for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. The cut slopes should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability.. Please note that loose soil can cave suddenly and without warning. Utility contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. Drainage Considerations We recommend the use of footing drains at the base of footings, where (1) crawl spaces or basements will be below a structure, (2) a slab is below the outside grade, or (3) the outside grade does not slope downward from a building. Drains should also be placed at the base of all backfilled, earth-retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch- minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non-woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing, and it should be sloped for drainage. Drainage should also be provided inside the footprint of a structure, where (1) a crawl space will slope or be lower than the surrounding ground surface, (2) an excavation encounters significant seepage, or (3) an excavation for a building will be close to the expected high groundwater elevations. We can provide recommendations for interior drains, should they become necessary, during excavation and foundation construction. All roof .and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 7. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. • Daily Homes JN 97281 August 26, 1997 Page 7 Groundwater was observed duringour field work. If seepage is encountered in an. excavation, it should be drained from the site by directing it through drainage ditches, perforated pipe, or French drains, or by pumping it from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should slope away at.least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Pavement Areas All pavement sections should be supported over at least 8 inches of imported, gravelly structural fill. Additional structural fill or fabric may be needed to stabilize soft, wet, or unstable areas. We recommend using Supac 5NP, manufactured by Phillips Petroleum Company, or a non-woven fabric with equivalent strength and permeability characteristics. In most instances where unstable • subgrade conditions are encountered, 12 inches of granular, structural fill will stabilize the subgrade, except for very soft areas where additional fill could be required. The subgrade should be evaluated by Geotech Consultants, Inc., after the site is stripped and cut to grade. Recommendations for the compaction of structural fill beneath pavements are given in a later sub- section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill. The performance of site pavements is directly related to the strength and stability of the underlying subgrade. The pavement section for lightly-loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 4 inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or 3 inches of asphalt-treated base (ATB). We recommend providing heavily-loaded areas with. 3 inches of AC over 6 inches of CRB or 4 inches of ATB. Heavily-loaded areas are typically main driveways, dumpster sites, or areas with truck traffic. The City of Renton may have additional requirements for pavement improvements in city right-of-ways. The pavement section recommendations and guidelines presented in this report are based on our experience in the area and on what has been successful in similar situations. Some maintenance and repair of limited areas can be expected. To provide for a design without the need for any repair would be uneconomical. General Earthwork and Structural Fill All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill, but they could be used in non-structural areas, such as landscape beds. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Daily Homes - JN 97281 August 26, 1997 Page 8 density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not compacted to specifications, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: Minimum Location of Fill Placement Relative Compaction Beneath footings, slabs, 95% or walkways Behind retaining walls 90% Beneath pavements 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade, 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor). LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil encountered in the test borings is representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test borings. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Daily Homes and its representatives for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials, and selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. Our 'conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Daily Homes JN 97281 August 26, 1997 Page 9 warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents so the contractor may be aware of our findings. ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during.construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. The following plates are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 - 6 Test Boring Logs Plate 7 Footing Drain Detail GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. Daily Homes JN 97281 August 26, 1997 Page 10 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC r '' ', /'.. $/u'I77. /:p 27845 c31.4�, 4"CISTE44' 61��v 6'6'10NAL Er [EXPIRES 10/25!77 I Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Associate ,et,?„I/4 James R. Finley, P.E. Principal MRM/JRF:alt GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. • • .. +1 1 1. f • .. >�:�- EIYNIS y` S�� s,/OM S 12 ikz efcE.REMGI1, HE 6TN N t.WINO l4I' SS 1. : - \ gjP /"I OE+�F. �i HE iu.so a ��5126TH PLt II. >t. <T :N .1 4 S'w"t;;r` „ ' 0� CT ��`d= 6 3 x m ti 4{ 4 i a . ,A„%os MIHO- -.,. 1 o PERnOALE 128TH Z ST -5: 4 :I i ';, ..I IFEl 4TH Q x 9007/ _ ,�� ST:L Nlttsa rHECT 8200 j• i • ST 9 ,:. ST ` /= o A ...PA•. 1.^v! ® { .. x. o LI&! A40 I�'v 2500 E r;: 'u�.o 0o cn oTH/T0y ��I _ ' �� 40 : oc� ®�� . t m 1 5-� O �� I. ' F � AIRPORT UL79"i � STr` 5 ■AiORT ® • . 132NDa ® �=Si TILLICUH - 1100, XI I M ` TOB[N IL =�'HTERe� ,� 300 xT�� - �5. .¢ j c r�'i 3 I S �i-- „�.' VICTOR! < Pfau IIe . 9" OQA. 4�{� y�" A i7 . I ST PA* ,n ' 4'v • �^i;'% _ z .TT-. �r >: 7 p RENTON Ih s .. ;a�2i. z,'.. - I'f L" ',..„,,sr,..„Z`, s'.�� , CJ NS 6 In,4 v7nx via ` �_CIB` iC�' g a = 1fnONT+ ut N LA ,' ,�� i r- 9, 7f0E 1P �. .'IR` o , DUVET • R i " - •_2ND_— $T. N >_ ;:E�f; s CE'VERY a :,I;vur a vvtu H00 Psr �� >. „,; , B sN Q p 7 mgAd S 3RD _Film, I" /�/.. - evo x 169 = N.(1 RENTON $� Op• H Jq � � RO ��__r__ BH I ,5�� 11�1�t °1.11S r� • • p �o�S� �Fy _BD.. 3a fir{ I EENfEY H m 1\L� ��%' ��, 77 �� 6THST O .167t' lPMERt $W _ S 7TH CiHAPLEP100a3 ' " EiMi �� 6 ROADSIDE aoo I 1 0 .,N '"a .� '0gliiit;„ PARK ^ i .+^ w ,<j PARK Q� :: ♦ T v �_ I - I rj I N vTi� `(V7. 'EMON VILUGE tsi�®E L�v,� �`N o o I r H $T • M( W 1 lE CENTER .` ``.S` F9C AF a SW 1 , IN S R NTON VILLAGE PL. S 11TH ST (E R!0 �I HOLIDAY _ ��•.. ``re' �'F ��' _''Q��"�aF r N S` INN C�� 40Jr - G g? .c `S'oEN q1e. <RR�� 1LICA 3TH> AN Z _ ` -ccw s� l o '�F �F e .$'/ 405 .�, ,,. o 16TH I ST MIMI r 15THW �" ``��. o,P ct- c sE , i rH st o- 400 !16TH ST $x1 - S 16TH ST! ST •' ii ., °,- �D�r P ,,SE`s S,�`�'P4, 16' 'y 4EN'Ty 4 _ r m Lo S .' it CT ,�I. • Sot V uam mK.1 O H W�� n',T fft SW 19TH ST ^ nr`t'1 $ ST r� �- SE s c7� �Y,, 1 SE W I G . eo,_TALBOT I - !-4, nlg�Pt=CT 5` g. sr Stc15Ti,I . . , P T �'I I-l.l q $ 19TH Szor,o v ..RILLI , �- Y V2� Ral10 tq"- s:'t,.t `'. �. ' /43,-.,4' 5•L',. /107 ,� rfm<L filRKi< 1 OD PUGET ^�'r 0��`"4 :rcr T d•��Ftt SF F 0�r y �°<� (n E.' z a r d� It ,1• 3 '� N i u CT zNp �?fY,S P`taT u_ C x SE 215T ST `S'E N'6016:tx SI `� SW 23RD ST S _23RD ST r AE ��IsE '2PDPL=a sF 4 T W - y� W W _P/6�1y 5Ts �� N:TfavueT �j`vs :MID .0 Z' I J \YYY�� r t �_c*�t r 2oT' < - - 11'C0 .cT' <Illirg *� tint ,. �`O~� y 1 C. �; < W SE 16390 STti 152�SW 27TH , 'sT%, r;.5? .S a• `I S 27TH ST: SE 1 4TH - ST H SE 164TT tiT� `• a H 10900 11100I S�JixiL ZBTH �•Pjsyt 7,0ZNCT 0 1 ter -ST ¢ v"'i` W SE 165THisfr' 1'7065TH I PL C` S Ct ,` k .t'4e <— L. fw ST ,.' -1, S'':,1 .A 29TH ST �t `'� t< 'iSM w Pl ,r 166TN'`�.. '6Lh T a' _N t= '�'� „ 0 40 QS•SO S �Ot W ST `. J. E I51TH S y - SHHPL r 12, ._-•• . 30 �Ib b N OTH CT , H N I 11 P. o -I SE 5W 3OTH '; s 29 t o u ..r sE 161T . I ST . SE'31ST ST 3Isr CT•: i_- ¢ SE 4 16c f" W h ,fc^ V' — W i tD Si i I 5 32H0 PL••••• • T N = SE 169TH L SE 169TH _ f> V. N laJ l Mitt: / AV- ';1 F SE$('17DrH ST 170TH 'ai Sr o/S' i y J `! , ?IL_ J4TH I CT lti7 / ? r ;��.rtls �6� o • VICINITY MAP OTECH 2XX LOGAN AVENUE S • GE CONSULTANTS RENTON,. WA 31_, �� Job No., Doh: Lopped By, Pole, �'°'~"��' 9T2'81• AUG 1.99T 1 t . . _ , . I , • 0 I B-I ILI S > S B-3 a ''ww 1 — U) cc I B-2 1 cc I S 1 O .� Cl)2 w > I ® 1 1 S`FgTrLF� PIP tlNF RIGHT of `"A-r LEGEND: S APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATIONS SITE EXPLORATION PLAN Ai GEOTECH 2XX LOGAN AVENUE S CONSULTANTS RENTON, WA i �. Job No.+ Dote: Plots 97251 AUG 1997 2' v `� S o° BORING 1 oti5 ,�`� S��tiQ os � G° �� 42'; USCS Description _ FILL Crushed rock(FILL) Reddish-brown, sandy SILT, moist, loose 5 — 5 IML — -becomes gray, less sandy io — 2 Reddish-brown, gravelly SAND, medium-grained, wet, dense 15 - 36 — v .. 20 — - becomes less gravelly _ 66 • 25 — ' -coarser-grained, gravelly 56 SP • 30 — 65 35 — -becomes slightly silty 82 40 — 84 Test boring was terminated at 41.5 feet below grade on 8-13-97. Groundwater seepage was encountered at 17 feet during"drilling. TEST BORING LOG GEOTECH 2XX LOGAN AVENUE SOUTH CONSULTANTS,INC. RENTON, WASHINGTON Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: •—� 97281 AUGUST 1997 JHS 3 II �,��1 �� S °°` BORING 2 G° 0 , 4,' USCS Description FILL Brown, silty SAND, very moist,loose (FILL) Brown, low plasticity SILT, with fine SAND,very moist, loose -becomes sandier 5 — 4 ' — 'sM :!-becomes gray, wet, v • ery loose ML; : — I 10 — 2 Gray and brown SAND, medium-grained, with trace silt, wet, 15 _ 18 medium-dense • 20 _ _ 14 ' Brown SAND, with wood, fine- to mediumirained, wet, medium- _ I dense - - log encountered 25 — 32 I : SIM1 -0 0 0 0-0 O°°°Ooo°O° 30 — 47 Brown, slightly silty, gravelly SAND, wet, dense — 'o00000°o0 oo°o°o°o°o ....00.... o O°O°o°O°o 35 — sP -becomes coarser-grained, heavily iron stained • 71/10 c o o ° o o c o 0 o °o°o°o°Oo°o 0000000°°° °o°00°000° 0o0o000o00 o°00000°°° 40 — °°o°o° 88 1°O°O°O°°°° o,o,o_o,o, Test boring was terminated at 41.5 feet below grade on 8-13-97. Groundwater seepage was encountered at 18 feet during drilling. TEST BORING LOG _4 GEOTECH 2XX LOGAN AVENUE SOUTH CONSULTANTS,INC. RENTON, WASHINGTON Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 97281 AUGUST 1997 JHS 4 BORING 3 4 °G°�l °�� . �`°Q6 USCS Description Elevation: 2" AC/2" CRB/2" Concrete Reddish-brown, silty SAND, fine-to medium-grained, moist, loose (FILL) -becomes less silty 5 — 46 I -becomes gravelly, dense FILL io — 47 Brown, SAND, fine-to medium-grained, wet, dense 15 — 37 _ -becomes gravelly 20 — . 53 I sP 25 — -with some silt • 90 30 — 80/5" • Test boring was terminated at 31 feet below grade on 8-12-97 due to drill refusal. Groundwater seepage was encountered at 18 feet during drilling. 35 — 40 — TEST BORING LOG _- GEOTECH 2XX LOGAN AVENUE SOUTH CONSULTANTS,INC. RENTON, WASHINGTON Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 97281 AUGUST 1997 JHS 5 • te' ��1 �, o BORING 4 G° 4,` •i> Qe' USCS Description Elevation: • _ \2" AC/3" CRB _ Brown, very silty SAND, fine-grained, moist, loose (FILL) -becomes very moist 5 5 FILL • -becomes gray, wet io — , 11 Brown, silty SAND, with.iron stains, fine- to medium-grained, • _ :SM •• moist, medium-dense Gray SAND, fine- to medium-grained, wet, medium-dense 15 — 24 ..: Sp • 20 — - with some silt and iron-stained lenses _ 18 25 — : : Gray and brown, gravelly SAND, wet, dense 41 • 00e0 00 Op0 • • •� °000 O O°0 00000000°0 • °000 O°0°O 30 — 46 ' _ [O�'O °0 '.O SW 0O . — SP °° °O°V O J O °O°000 000 35 — °O°°°°° 80 'D°O00000000 o o°o°°°o '0°0°0°0°0 — °0°0°0°0°0 D000000°00 — D.000.0.0. D.000.0.0. — 30°0°0°0°0 40 — •59 Test boring was terminated at 41.5 feet below grade on 8-12-97. Groundwater seepage was encountered at 8 feet during drilling. TEST BORING LOG GEOTECH 2XX LOGAN AVENUE SOUTH CONSULTANTS,INC. RENTON, WASHINGTON • Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 97281 AUGUST 1997 JHS 6 • • Slope backfill away from foundation. \ \ ✓—TIGHTL/NE ROOF DRA/N Do not connect to footing drain. BACKFILL See for I / VAPOR BARR/ER requirements. SLAB WASHED ROCK o° ,: �� %� ,, �, 4°min. u. i / I 6 min. '•,;•.• • FREE-DRA/N/NG . NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE SAND/GRAVEL FILTER FABRIC 4"PERFORATED HARD PVC PIPE Invert at /east as /ow as footing and/or craw/ space. Slope to drain. P/ace weepholes downward. = • FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL =_ GEOTECH 2XX LOGAN AVENUE S A CONSULTANTS RENTON,. WA • _ .__ Job No.: Dale: Scale: Plate: 97281' AUG 1997 N.T.S. 7 . I 1 - Ap►= DODOS ENGINEERS, INC. JOB NO. ✓✓ CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING DATE '4205 146TH AVE. N.E., SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE, WA 98007 • [206] 805-7877 OR 454-3743 BY i _ I. i ] ,i 4 f 3 ` i : 1 1 4„ i i I» . .r i i 4 1 , w99 , , V At3,- _ k r _ _ i , I s + F `r ' : `�.` i ' :, LLi4 t �.;.._j... _ —• _ • µ r ' I Z 1 . ...... , 1:_ ',.._..._.... .. . .. " µme .,1Y_', <_1 ...�.,,.., ii • �., ly a p 1 i T,_ , , 4 • fz_„ i „ I ! !• r t , ,1I •o... .A`.-k , , f } , 1' , ! _i 1 ' I u_. • r , , i 1 A t, • .'s`,.` . _, . , ANALE� , .i g•G. _ .1_ t I EXPIRES1 0Ij_ , 1 7-Rzel._?Ii..szss.), ,p... (1,...,.i...),12.ucu........ •,_ . ..,.,..,., ,,,..., ..r....,.... .,... 1 jj 4` . .1,,......,,,,:,i,..4y,._-,f••Th-...,,:-...........";1.....;•er.:...•.i.,."'-,-: -.:' '' :-- •- -'''-;''' :- ''!--::-: --.-1-- :.,,:;.;...v-,..i.:...;-:.:-,,,..,.,!.,,.-:• • 1 -:-lr•--14.-7-11F SHEET OF Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner 7AL-Ui Project Name N i t.) .IOC Address 33t<O fu;--VR.M P+ 4 AVE, 4-1O0 Location �3 Phone S'PT VLG, DNA IOZ Township Project Engineer TDboo Zoakt EtRS Range S Company Section Address Phone ( :, - t P`Ct€7 CALLS.) Project Size rL �p� AC 24- Upstream Drainage Basin SizeV'4K13 AC PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS O Subdivision O DOF/G HPA [-1 Shoreline Management O Short Subdivision O COE 404 O Rockery O Grading O DOE Dam Safety I-1 Structural Vaults �.Commercial FEMA Floodplain I= Other Other COE Wetlands HPA PART 5 SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN ,} Community Drainage Basin NI • { PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS • O River Floodplain O Stream O Wetlands • El Critical Stream Reach O Seeps/Springs Depressions/Swales El High Groundwater Table O Lake El Groundwater Recharge O Steep Slopes Other El Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART 7 SOILS S ' Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities'. S \ LET 0 N O Additional Sheets Attatched • • 1/90:,; , o Page 2 of 2 =`-', King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET • •ART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS • ' REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT El Ch.4-Downstream Analysis l to lS Stc. Cul2R2c;t\i l,`t vt SC Hs,QG�,S -TED rc+ 1 LI G L-< CE:+-i RAl_. SySTEI-k• (mil a 5l4tz1FIcANT . CO 0,-t 09.o Lo a v.. S tTE c_icm,n v'no NS w i l.L CHANZ • 0 IS -0 4oSEP TO C01.1 .4r \--p WIS e•AS %NG 0 S J$TE. \ W 1-R p.Li�" iirr n Additional Sheets Attatched • PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION O Sedimentation Facilities O Stabilize Exposed Surface I T Stabilized Construction Entrance O Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities O Perimeter Runoff Control El Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris O Clearing and Grading Restrictions O Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities O Cover'Practices O Flag Limits of NGPES Li Construction Sequence O Other is O Other 1 • 'e•ART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM , O Grass Lined Channel O Tank Cl Infiltration Method of Analysis Pipe System O Vault n Depression O Open Channel O Energy Dissapator n Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation ' . • O Dry Pond O Wetland O Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage. E) Wet Pond O Stream O Regional Detention . Brief Description of System Operation DtkNoJSQc0v:S P.r- Q P1ZAttyg To 3:,, 911 facvc.-s CO NN&xec To V-V-W%NC. Mute (VAL, 5`(S%PA• • Facility Related Site Limitations El Additional Sheets Attatched. Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS (May require special structural review) I—J Drainage Easement I-1 Cast in Place Vault O Other n Access Easement 1l Retaining Wall El Native Growth Protection Easement . O Rockery>4'High n Tract Cl Structural on Steep Slope [l Other •ART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site.Actual �� site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the Tplk,-. attatchments. To the best of my knowledge the information.provided ��•� here is accurate. sry .re 1/90 ; ' • ... 1 .„... . -''') • . . ) .. .'• ,:': .. . • . . • _ • .. _.,..1 JOB NO. _••••— __ DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. . ..1 MID--------- CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING • PLANNING DATE --7.z_co,99--,....'-. --_ - 4205 14BTH AVE. N.E., SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE, WA 9B007 .,. ..•:!,.- BY 'F' " ::101-ars• (206] 885-71377 OR 454-3743 t I . . • . . . . , ,r.,,\2),..t.,..L,12•1 ' i lak '•-'-r!N.IC.:;-(1,-''r 'i-r-r•i 1 ,,„„ 1. '„1„! A,,,,J.,..i.,i„ ,' i • ; 1 i ; 4 1 ...i..1, i : ; / , , - ... , . - ‘.... , re•••Si.1- .-C ' ' ' 1 yt,"-;-".";.--r-r.i.-•cr.. ,;:.---,---i";-I") :1 ; ,,.•;. ',...:..-..: 1 .,..,..; ; ..;. ........ ', I. .i. i. _11- 1 ' . , ,,. , .--f--,--,---1-• --i-,-1 --;---, - e"11 :7-1""L".•-r-i') ' ; : il . i ) rii , ii , . : • . , '-'1••• .. •.. W; T•:*O' V:• • 0- .'2•D.).' C•••":T-•;;•"•'!;:•.e ‘(,0:•g' q' ‘1 9,...5I.::I P1 -:'.0-i-A1.:; N!'-''t 111:-_.V..,0" G; I4N I J-:.t,i E' S'' N;. '.-,:,-c,--..t-..o-,r-,-:, ';J-.i,,...-'t7-j"21 -9;.--•r"....1:-,*-..1-L1--.....tI..,-:i•1-....-.., i I , : i , C t ; ' ' 1. =• L' i j: ,i .1,,,i.....'_I.,„_.;„I .: ..i .; ' • ! • ' 1 , , ' .! .1....I..) i ...,t, a..:- . • • ; • ?. '''''1•1•-•••t-'-'1•11-1-:/"••t."1••1".i--1---r-,.-.--1-i- F.,. r I : i ; ' ; ' ' ,; •'_:....•.,/..}....1-1.....1-1-3.-..L.J...4-1--. •.• ..i ' ' :••-•- ' C•1", .1-1.". t..1::.1.... ./ l• • ' • ; • 1' •,.. .'. ' : . k i. : i_ :....L.,_ '...,/..,;.1.,.4., i' .. . i' .. / 5 , — e 3 • • r‘f .!..-1 . • (.) I I $, . • .. ,• . 1 . 'Z' I ..• • ,..... . ..-• ''i.. .. -• _ I I il:'•'. _i________1_ • ____I . I., ,. ,/- ,,.. 6 • • u•-•t:'•• • ' ‘, .7/ •• . •,., ::.,4 •N0013'00•14, Nc11757.re 7783 ‘') / -------1- 1-1:. „ :A ALLEY (•., •• - 1 •..I/, SU/LOINS . . % ..••. 1 •..-ez•I' N89.Z.Pre- /54,0/ 11'•1 . ... 1 • `—...,.i ///2///./ ////// • • ••C C so' -71••-• "-Acme .s•mai v am'/wet ririo \••1/PCPITO PER CITY OP '•+i ;;:••trg/ ••,...„, Z2Z10.9W. a REIITON OffD main, .-•"' % . . .., • 1.... t.,.) rs, t3 FICOI.W407/ • ..c.i' /00.00-1tAr 'J x mo.9 i-me. k ao. • I ••z.- %. ,:t.... ac ''•. ' A: i:`,..;. t:'• A 5 .• 1, , . . '..: y) . • ;I:" 26 ,n l'.n - 44 f.': -. • i , 2 • I:''.... ' . PARCEL A ....` ;• '.6. 6 „..tC R. • _____ - " N .41' • ' .J.2 ;, : 0 :..• ft: . I-•:-. •.•':. -._ . ,_•,' \ • -------. 1 n..., . . . I - . , . ',, i'• • . '''.' • • : . . . s.; '•••1i.k•,:•-"‘••..—•.•,-.'a•-••i,1.-•;,_*:..:• 4.-.-,.f-- • -. . ..• V . . r ktikt :::-.: :-,.-.•. • . :,.......ts.. •I c‘4Z0.,..o. d... _. . . 4 r-:,.•,. - ..'4•,1 r 6,t.„ ,.:,•...Iii,,.:,''••( •.i.'-,:, ,., ... ' • 4,..pu,• C o-fr, . eio,•Cc- 1i%cx.-s • rI F"k0kIi —-- •• .' W;'.:.•:. .1:.::.• ' : .: H .•• , • are.. •''' ;,:,.,,:,-1Th•,4,, . . ,.'.'.:.,t*:.,.,..!,'.i'X.••'.•• ', . • • . . .-7.P'.c' e• ,toe 4-• • 4• „or.-4).. m . 1, tgg•._ •'' :.i..• .2 (C4IC) ,.• •'',...:. ' • -Li. :,•''..;•..,:•.,,11•'-'•., _-`,:.."''' ' WIF,,,irrt:.`,.."-t ',• . . . • i'... ''1:,'''tV.';'';','' ' .. . • ',..--... ' ti!= ';:til/At'''''', - • „ ' ,. ... :A.:.:::'!,'....'...''';: :•',......7..1: -.1.;•:::.:''''-I-4.1... , i I • .! ' ',--"I'*."1'.1."1'41*.T.'1'"r1A.,..!?..t.:"...t.'7,.tr.i.."..,r,..7!" ..7.'-'77.T..TI.T.,7::!.,':....,,.1..',...:;',.:;.-,i.,.!.:i...,., .,.7...7-.7.:1...,...t..1..„.r.......1.....-.,-,,,,..7,J.,,. .-.C.,IC; " ' • " ' '' ' • 1 .'-' ' i T, r. ; I 1 1 i 1 I 1 'i A../ J I.,'' ,', .!.2.. k-.i,.!,.......,,c,,,-...,,..U.,...1....,,...,-,...i.--',,.,,n1...,•,,,+,../...4.41!.....). t-..:,'j • %,,,,.!.4,,'..',....-L-J.-g-t-,-".-...tt = ',--' '':• ''•' 'c•i'''',.'' 4HA"'H"'AT"Ar"i•-r-r-,!-Tern''''r--i•"•-•—)••'• •••••-'17't;•;:;;;;.I_.:...'...3...i_1.1,..21_:„'_..L.j....L...'..1..1.1.1...,.....1 ,....42..L.4.,,,i. .-;',...i . . . : , . , , _ .:._ ,:.-...• -1-_,..1...,,.. -v-N-E,- -, --1-,-1---c- ;--: r •,-- <, i • i , Hill- 1 j j i , -I'M 1 t.....H I '.'::-':', .., -....--L-,..---,---, - --.- A ff"‘"1*-A i -i-I , ' • t ''''-A ' : ! ! '-'1 7 ' 1- t"'..C--1.171.4 !-1...»'..-..1-'i -•,c, , . , . ....„., . ' . .-, ''''''f-' IT-/) Ail L;I , r, , s.1-6.[N, . . .....:. ,..., ..., ..,._,..,„4.......\-....-- -L-.L.,-. .....,,,,..., ; . .. ,....:._ ,C..06•V•IIT .z....,,.„,, / , •S t. . .' t S C.0(LC46%V43...M.it COVL.:-.'261.9 1Gxj--t'll'i r sl.Vls'-Pi L-1.- •0 3Z Co I-1C abr" 1--.F.1--1- ',...',..-_,;.i • • -• • ' , ' --- -1 -,- ;', - .; . " ;. - • ; -,.....,, , ; ..;,..- ,..... ......... ,,,,,•, ...,..„1,,,..c. . ,,:,...... • ."'?-Mil"Oe1/4. GO LTIA ..: ..31-,"4c.S_;'"-.51AALL.TATtlt.IAS 1_ C;P'!•COr't PAC--Trida-7.C.-.;VAs it)oc?..-1----f;•,-1",...-; -- ,.--- , -:, - i .,, . • : •--...,,, . ;,•,--..;;;1 , '','' '.9j.:)C.:....g.:. 1)11.2F-PX.....V1 --rA:.V..0.iL.:',1.7.?-.7 0.NS\C.-14 LI.,:At •1 INA .(=e.i./IOUS', - . : ' : ,, 6, i• I. I'-6,..,1,77.-1 . Sc)4.-\Y.:POO '. ...,',•...,":V'''1-'''•::..'i' :'...-.1• •,'...... ..;- ,- --- '.i - ': .• . •:' . -,...--:-.,--,--..r,...',.'..,--.1.....r-r---I- i ,".r•-'•7-1 f•••'; t; ; ' ' ' ; : ' : "..•,..',.. ! ; ;. / ........."..;-.....1.----/....•.-',-•1-!,-,-:1-'1----;•• .,., - .. :-i. .--!--,,,• •-•-•'•-•:--.-i•-:-•••1 1-:-1 1•""1-1-1- '-1-1.'•• , • `,1 1••.,i i,,: ,! ., . ; ,,,•„,_ ..),..1,.11...,1.... ...,,. . - .- , •;.'I i..'.•;..".1 ; . • •'' -1..4\xs -slis •6.-i-i-cL--T-..1.T.• •••:•!-ets'Ait.,..t.T.C:LI . r:COVeq-E-0-;-GUIR4.---i-FN---.sw I L-v-IIN - •••- , • ,, . , -. -: •, . i , . • , ; _. 1...L..L .....i. ,.2...::..: ,,.,-,•-. ' . ' . ". ''' "1-1H"- -b- • ' ,=.1.0 vous.: Sogc1.4 i.u4ift-tirci7 • ?)(2-.:.-cd?.4-30•5cPsilicJA:CT.V6-*t51:.-5 --i-.1 .%- ..I. i.-71K?L.- „ , , , ,-. ,-,•,-, , ,.-• , ,•-.. ---, ,-,J :,-.,,. ,•.‘_•„-.rd . • • it,oct.). LD -71-kactreft-_•...',0A1c. :.(.4f...:_ t.,\Hr ; A-7 . • .. .., - .., ., :__•. :11 Alr""•. ., , ,_< ,.,....• ,., . . ,,....i. ), •-•L ._.4 :...',.. ''.<..'. ----:.2<-'• , -.,-,:'. .!.--:- :- !: ',-,i. ;--:<--::---':---;--i-H-tt Jc-F-r"1"'"1-',i •-:. .-, Ai\-AL • .rs-(D-•-ii-) LA-J _ 0, ! .-;..._. ... .1-. ' „- - •-:•: ,---: •---:- ' '!. ,'•-.!-- '-',;••i--",..-i-r-i-;"--.11-.',1,,,-;-1: ;,•-'-'.i•A :- : • ' .•../ •. ... : i• '• :-/•-;''; .-/•.':, -',' ; - •••.• :-: -;' •:• ;:. -;:: ; : 'i• "•'•: •:.:1"1-1•••1-h••11""rirt"El''', . ,;,..<,..4 ' : , , • :, I , .; ;.. ', ' i..; ; < !.. -, ', -1. -. -;--',-,,- , •••-1 -<- -H r .4---f•;..i.--,.--..;-.1-i-•vr-,•<-7-17---7.; <!, ':A,-i;i0 • ' i ..,_ " , • • < , ; ,„ ; , , ;;,, , ;;; ,; ;_<; ,•;•:,;;1; ..;,..,.. ;,: ; .; .„ ,i t i : < , L.,,.< i. ! '1 ,< 1••,<!--i•A,- r. 1 . •• . -.-- • - '• •r . .• -.. ••-• ".• '''-''' . ! • : ' . ' ' : : ' " • ' : .'. 1 i i' l / ( • .1 '''•• ''. .1C.•••;;"..e. • C- '', !..• i i•-': ! %,-•, -C - -'• • ••-•,`" •' - r ',':- ".-1"!'•:-..i.”•:. •1-1-C..1•••r-rn1;;;„7;.:-•''; '.•.,';':': . !..:',";!'''.2.,1 • . 1 '.So'?,..-.! SHEET OF ,ti.:-..'Aii ,• k ,.,.. 'Z',4.'!,j . - . • . - - . • .,,. .,...!,•- .. • . • . •1 . , - . ). . , .. - . • AL, .:,..,.-.• ------------api._, DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. JOB NO. 6/1cP). -. •,•:••• - ..• ai.,_____,-- CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING DATE q 176 cY1 '•- . -..,..'..:2;.•': -- - 4205 140TH AVE. N.E.. SUITE 200 - BELLEVUE, WA98007 c ) [206) 865-7877 OR 454-3743 . . BY FDS DODOS • • . 1:..,s ,:,p z, 7),,z_k,4--, ...„,:.t,..14‘ i.H.-0:e.(1.1.0 , .1...j.....r...1....4....i....„.T...!.....i_,....,.....hi.i...:...ri 1_,.: . . ,....:..,...F„.i._.,..._...1...i....1....1.....,..1 :.,,,,..„4. . . ,',.- -.•: •i--, `,-, 1., r-t---H--,--•--.t-------L-4 . 1-,-1 , .1., ;•-4-. i•••-i•-•,-1,-L1,--1„.•:--, :,:,••••...',.. . , ,+.,f ;,,•;.-ii.- ••:, •. , • • ,• . ..i. ti•! ,.,..,' il-•-• 1 : I ,„., ,,' ' 1 il ; : 1 I. -I 1 i i.-I 1 i i.,1-1:-.--,'-',,.••!...."' F"""•H't1 H---.'''.(•; " ''''''-'. /71 .•'"' •'-14•..,1••i•*&'1 0 l'A•ii N-T-1.---: ::-H-'?•I''.--st.•14= IAZ; :•-i. ':'' ''T-i''1-1-1-7-1-1-'1"1--- :..::',',',•..,' ,- -- • -: 1ooy V., - , •1 ; , . . .• ' I t''''-t- 11.11.,,,',.1 1 ' , , , . , ; , 1 ' , , n 1 i h i ' i'' ' I ' ' ' • ; /' 1. ',<" VI si•56(•k-.. 'ios.c_G •.\;:\ .%-,5.,:"C.6.1 .11tiTi1.‘si 0,-.T.01.V_..,Q:01k0V.41-1-,SVM.:' . 0 740;1 Q;-1 ::. •-•-•.-C-11-•'"'''"e)9 • ; ; ; : ,, , • , ; , • ; • i ; In , •-1-i--"-: ''. : ; • ; •-•'!"1' .: 1 "-'"F"'+'-"*; 1-,---1- -,,,- ,.,. •r". , 't ''' .'"'"•.--.''' -_,..:-.;--..._L-........,...d.-1. 1.,.L.L.--6,..1....,...-.-1....1.-.1 :.-..-•, ,- • : '. l• ',-:-:'-' •--1--L-1•'-•-1-4"-1-11•-:•'''.. k • , ; i • • : A' ' A ' • 1-r-i- 1 f, , i- . •; Sut,-,-- L.L.The. 9/26/97 Dodds Engineers, Incorporated , DALLY HOMES RENTON MORRIS/LOGAN •PROJECT .1--;•-i--1-- ,' :..• • . TiK'CtO0Art-. ‘S BASIN SUMMARY • „I- .(....+...1 • .. ect,:v.-ea.tvey. : - •. - - ., • 4:Et:t1. .,-,, coota.vis,Tiv E.'t(Nc..6-:.:' BASIN ID': 1 o°Dv ' NAME: 100 YEAR. DEVELOPED 1 ' IA o•-sT-ls,-,;•11,-(.• .0 IL). 4 - • SCS METHODOLOGY, •\ i' d 1- • ': :FLOCji34....!: TOTAL AREA • 1.24 Acres BASEFLOWS: ''0.00 cfs i,F ; , • .• • . • .i A 1., , ; " • • ; , , 'i RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS' AREA Li...4...ft .,• . f.Ax.. ,t-..-P.: J..' .):21"..... • 1'... • .2." : PRECIPITATION • 3.90 inches AREA. . : 0.00 Adres . , . . . • ,.1 , , . • •------"-----,----• ,• - -• - ' • • - TIME INTERVAL • 10.00 min CN • 89 AO i••rr 7,::• :- TIME OF CONC • 10.00 min IMPERVIOUS AREA r1"1-1--T-T. '',•,.;,.„;„ ;_! ! .:_, . . , .. '. :, ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 AREA. . : 1.24 Acres ft-";-•4‘• . ' .... CN 98.00 •, ..1_1-..t.,....k,. .; ,11060. 1R: k.vL.,-Lofap ' •- PEAK RATE: 1.42 cfs VOL: 0.37 Ac-ft TIME: 470 min • ',1"1"$'I..4.-',., • 1 • . ; • ; . , . . •!I•, i: 1, ,I.:,, '.--- ! :. • • -• . , ., • 1 ti-t----,..'~;,, ,, • - • BASIN ID: 100YE - NAME: 100 YEAR EXISTING . •• ,, .! , A- '.. . SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 1.24 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs• 1 RAINFALL TYPE • USER1 PERVIOUS AREA ...1-1-1-1.1 • •-• - i PRECIPITATION • 3.90 inches AREA • 1.24•Acres :: -•:.•-,--• . i TIME INTERVAL ' • 10.00 min CN 89.00 TIME OF CONC • 10.00 min IMPERVIOUS. AREA - • • ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 ' •• • AREA. . : 0.00'Acres 4_,'; ,-1 -.. ••••• '.: 1-1-1-j•" ` • • , ' CN 98.00 •-,4. ' --1-: • ' ititi- j.R. :. tr-',v4..sra.J.61.. • PEAK RATE: •1.09 cfs VOL: 0.28 Ac-ft TIME i 470 min • • ! , • , ' ' • t , ' ' • , ! .• • " • . , •i , : ...1., , , ,..!. : „„;-/-1. i Jr• ; ,r„,, ri--, , ; .--1- ,,..,- , i ; ;.--n - . , i , -; fn - 1 1-1* 1 I [ .'.-::' mi.-,, , 11 , i- ' 1----i , ; , I-i ; •; j--i---. ,- i..T17.kt. .',,D CZ.GIC.icE.:_'.1,'S. :.±.1t.t.;34.V7.."..1.1.1‘..c.;1_11._-",-.171.i40-.1i.-..1.577,1-.L.T.:-Vili I'Ci-1.--4'0- -"'C'f'S-L." - , ,i i S , . , 11,1.:.•• .-. - - . : ;,-- -ii ---- - ,- .1-4-1---.-1•:, '.. . 11-t ,, AI--i-! ,,---, : 4- - - ' • . ' : ' ' .' 1 ;-4 1 i : : i'•-•-1; ! ! i ';'••-1---•4-4-•-.!-L-1--C--1---.4.-i--1---•:-'.--; •:•-••:,- ;---'4.--.,•-••----.-•:••!-H--.1--1-1•:•-•--4- 1••• ••••'l-w'LS'i-jkar...'".--:‘--.--1'-'- :C,4.&:. ?,17.--1--- 9_ -'s ---r--06.7.7e.k.,.-zo- 1--.1-1-1----.--.H..-'..--,--1.-±4----------::-i--t-1-11-7-1-1, ••.•-, • . . , , . , I i : • , : , , „ . ...... „Lt. , ,,-,-,:-.;-1- -,.„L', -IP:rt`.1- i j i I- r I-, i c i "1-;'.1-',---;-1-i•-•'-7--;•' ri--i-T-'''''''''''---,7--t--•-1.-1-1.--;-, .. :••.- i.--7"--.-------:. • . . • [--- -1-I g : .._-:-- -r-,--,t _.-1-,---i-----ja..-I-1:... ..-:.• 1. -)----:--i-W- -. .,1-,`. 1AP__ff,: ,-p)-:-.L.- ci-..-1-1..-'&'-..7.>-1 .-...-E-4\g'S7E-1f.,_-Z072W-, -. ri"•f\--4sGVL'qlEL512 '"11,'-•:,.. , ,.. , 1 .1 , ! i , i . • ; , •, , ,.; :. ii , .., , , , , I • il ! , ; 1 -, , , ; ,, , i•T"i-, ,. ....; . H 11--:,S l'OCE, -1 •ti•0-r:;.V.RteRVIOL/S•7'„1.:. -.0,14-c!;;PC; CE:11-Sk-alEC.-VITOTi:VeVit,C.LLS- ti,'..-,.'1,::• ; I '. ' _„.4. ) • 1 ; i.., ...,-. j, i, _ . ..i..,1, ....-'.•-. • ;',-•-•`••!- -'-•:-0 F.::-, C\''\•C',tY. CLe---.---Sttyitke6, ,thL.'-t'-'11111L,I 1/....\.,,c7DED: : :1 ,I....)• 1 !• , ]...., 1, . ., .. .......,.....„--.. • , •A kij ....y.,,.,-. ,,),,, .....,.i,, ., _,.--,i _ • J-, , ' ,,,e...,,,,,, _.,„:. „ 't -':';_,,,,j,,' '''.A.."-:,,1:',:,,:n.,,,,17:',.,:'•.:' \ CA ''.\-\-\--VS"-:.C... fely2;.1--iNc,,y .y..L_I 0 -:',„_1,„ , ,,j ; c...=!.. ..,(„JA,(2,1L„1•,-,.1.6t,...1,,:1,,,i,,,L,...‘,::,.•;.,•, . ) • .„ . • ,..,,,...,:':Li -LI , ...• ; • - •• - ...: •-Li- 1 i ; 1 , ? : : : : ; i ; . , , ; : : L, • • •••!:•;- SUboip,t,:..),.\ "L"'_L\.;.;,. ,fiv. e;410':"- --c.. .c.-, N-R264,••A-r,-,:•-•;--,'' • ••'," ;•r'','•••'i- -,,•••1•••:•-i•-•••••1•1•I-1.,,,1--,t,,,, .....,..,;,- A-0,4-, -; ', --t-i-?-I• ; ,- ••• '•-• : ' : 1* ' r•-1 j .•...:,.-- 6(fi- Cu ge@...:-rit1eTT';',E-SLf;', 1";< :,-i .'. ',-; ', ' • ' ' ' . ' ' ' '''' c._ 'i . " , ; • 1 .14 , 1 ; ' 1 , i ' ' ' "7 • .0.0.'14! 1...,.....!._!.....4,',....,..0•,„I':'. ' • '•-:••••,•;,---;•••-:--!. •;•-4-,-••••••,--;•••-!--c•-h-r-4.-•-'1•--t•--;-, ,'-t-: , I : , v-1' -:, , .•• ••..•• , ... 1 • ' , 1,,, , I. ,-:.-k-,. " - ' *. ' . .'` ' '''•: ; :"•I-I-I i• i i' '1-'0 •.t-l'ti. ; i i-; •7 , .••Of AWe'?iCen•-• ‘ q • • ' : ; ' ' • ' ' ' ..; ; : :-, -4-1 - i----' , : ', --.‘, •• '•Afoi-;-• "*:---N•P- • . .--',- -. ; - -..- !,--- • --i- ! HI--;---i.-.1-4----i--; 1 -.- rpro,7- ' , ,,,, ,...,.,1..,.; ,_, , :_,•„.,.,.,..-„,.. . ... , : • : ‘ , . , :. ,. . , ,. .,,,..,.,,,,,..,..,:_,.L.1_1-f,...-.I...--/....:-.4...I__ 0., ..„.••roi- 'III k.'I %•' ;:- ,,..4-.1. ---;...- • • ., . • • ! • • : . ,.. : 1 i 1 1 ; i ,-1 ' , • : 4 i . ttl .01100 1: ,, • ,,,) •,, -, .„:. .. • ' '.-:' -f''''-'- :• i"' ' ..:-'Hr.'i.''i,H'--;.''.1"'HI-'i-,-4--r.t. "t-'H-NA'- ,..1h::_0). z.,...\-i---C:' c. ' . . ',,...L.:. , ...; . . . . (/'',7 . ,,-,,, ,,i) '... : •. .. . . , , , ; : ! ! , : ,- : . 1 I ' i - 0,:•fols-Toks..7 • . ' i , '., 4._' .,.. •,.---. : • ,,-,,,,,,,, • . , , . , . , , : . , : 1.1 ,,,. , I , : ; 1 ! : . .. us, %,‘C, .,. -, -1-I-•i-i'-", 1.17-` ::.':.:-: '' ; . ...: ' -..-• '.....:.,7.,..'. ....C..-;.;.-. '..-T.:I.:..i:::.1...I.J,:::1-• :-..-.,',I:'I .... • /.0NAL •••• ' ,,.. l'11-111.. . . .,. - . . ! , , , , , , : . ? 1 ; , i i 1 . , . • • im-: . . . FIRES.-` 4-)2•010)'f' SHEET OP '4...-'111:1',."..1-"1--i4'1'.'"'P::' . , .. . ,.. . . . , . . , , , : , i 1 .1., ! ) ^ ; ,-. z ! ! , , : , . - . : , : , „ ,•• .•i-..-i 1 .IA.i -, ,,:,,, ..: ...• . ,_.. , - , - ;1.,,,...A..,..),....:.....:.,.,..... .....•..:.,... .. ..„.. ...,._:....•,.......,_L.i..,.,.....,,...„.::...i.,,,.„,...,,k.,..;„. .„.,....,.„L..L.,,„;,,,,1 :-..A.-1-,,L....i.....,.1„.•i”!.,-...,,....,.L.i..,,!...,.i,..,,L:,,,,„...,.......L.L,J.,.,,,..," .,..,..,i,.;,,Lt...' ':: :.44`•'' .. ' . . . • • * • 0.7.7. •!';..-..`,!:•••'•,' . - . •. • ...,,_, , • ' ;:.2:';'-.:-. .. . • ' PIVIE R..ICESDIUISIaN'< < <">' �>� < ��«>«� �� >'>��< '' '>��<<> • • VIRONM ENTALCHECKLIST-...--- • PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: • The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment: The purpose of this.checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and.to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can . be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS.FOR APPLICANTS: • • This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to•determine whether the environmental impacts of your • proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, • you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write"do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark • designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your - proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. • USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: • Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. • Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Zevitvr (00 A etr,/tvhe nt . 2. Name of applicant: D A I k 11-brn-e s II1 cL- . 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 3l G7 r(/thhrvnco, Ark_ J lob Cittari e LA- �od�` e 1-H-e,) kV 15 I v• C2 0 0 32S •-3?7o 4. Date checklist pre'ared: _ 101 /Li i en 5. Agency requesting checklist:-' ° f-riA —t Pt _ 01- cAt--, 0-fr Leyi , 5 t (// 21.-'9 v.I A-i 7 4(' 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): J Cof'1StrGiC:�hF-h c �• i.r �- 1,-.I„ ` 9 s Can 51YU{c,f7v Conti l -C�c r,,, 1? 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, ourther activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. $to . 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. • s° l l 5 C1.1411 12'1 ev-o-f-ed, -JN i 2 11,,� .02(41 PhG vi ► o 0,1 9. Do you know w11 Cher app ications are pending forsgovernmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. itki* 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your oposal, if known. ' 601/411,_ „ ci -1-e- 4' g7,-., a,rprryx-e Se-r: 1 er,zz, 71 &14ry�,,,� re,?,,,,,,-( 11. Give brief, complete�4�t1.�escript'lon your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. 2 . i Environmental Checldst 1 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and •range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries. of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if • _ reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. rocel pro 5ta s ifs cr- s Lo5m,_ 3 A. Lift C.,z-1--4- 1.1) 344,1:46( Ow ate B. ENVIRiNME�ELEMW1 �N� 1. EARTH a. General description of the site(circle one)' flat rolling,-.hilly,.steep.slopes, mountainous, other • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 4.)t • c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify and note any prime farmland. 5I ,1 • d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. kj( t 01-a ke-cC erntk, dtsjA rrço e. Describe the purpose, type, and ap `roximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Tro VoS v v J S e v\. "e_`Fc 5 in J f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. • 12K rill- � � i�/wl pcs5 c b1.- g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 3 L r • Environmental Checklist - . • h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: (uS1.nv` C e•YIAYO ta/►.%-- .0 gw rprryvt 2. AIR • • a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.;dust, automobile, .7 odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If •.any,•generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. +D C tYLI b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that•may affect yourproposal? If so, generally describe. c. - Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: UG1 21own 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,.wetlands)?.. If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. /ti 0 • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands .and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate pth�e source of fill material. /" 1rL / 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. ND 5) • Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. A if • Environmental Checklist • 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Na • b. Ground Water: 1) .-:.Will-ground water be withdrawn,.or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. n1 0 . 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground:from.septic tanks or other ..., sources,.if.any (for.example: Domestic sewage;.industrial,'-containing:.the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size•'of.the system;the-number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/1/41-• c. Water Runoff(including storm water): (k1+ C,TL,1 � Sfrlit Y f 1) • Describe,the source of runoff (including storm water).and..method. of.collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. b1 . 7 CC ! S;,(s 1$rN- 1,611 -�=C-'� (v f( e 2 Could waste 'tenet.enter ground diJsu ace waters?.If so, generally describe. N(19- d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: ? ,.Y G � � r(ei-kvz- . 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: V deciduous tree: alder, maple, 4' p aspen, other evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain • wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation • b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 12tatt I J 5 Environmental Checklist • c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. • NIPt- d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance • vegetation on the site, if any: • ay)Ape,,(XC Let/J'Iryt,C-Aile , r(ft - fe-/)'- 6741-. i • (2.,,,,4„,_, eii,...... .) 5. ANIMALS a. .::. :.Circle any birds and animals which have been observed.on-or-near�the:site:or.are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) l IT Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals:deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon,trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or.near the site. iv ily-4__ c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain S ii(ii i'1`I OLOv1 , d. Proposed measures�( to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Al/ r- 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES . a. What kinds of energy lectri , natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's ergy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. I: C-7h-.l 1-_i I la? . b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. WIt't/0k)V\ c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in t86_1 )he plans of this proposal? 4) List other proposed easures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: rK. K -1 ) (v. , b la mil e c-- 6,' /- '- L) .ert.ey, :A 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HE .TH • 6 • Environmental Checklist a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NO 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. • kip . 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: • . b. Noise 1) - •What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,- equipment, operation, other)? GCS ((/Yt car 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a • short-term or a long-term basis (for example:."traffic,.::construction,:.operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. I,Cry t ,,‘{1 CC y0i r t-rz 6 fi c1 ) j o — 1,1� 3) Prop sed asures o re ucee oor cdntrnoise impacts f any: 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?ee/ta b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. tt•n 144.ow:- c. Describe any structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? e. What is the current zoning/classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 7 • Environmental Checklist • g.. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? V� K1f'1�v o✓ PI- h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,. specify. • i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? l-7o j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: iopY�.2_ I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing:.and -projected land uses and plans, if any:t( at,co_z_ 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. /f D 111.l cLGI X t." ti.,?5P-‘_. n .._ coc,a\A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: • 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. I ` 114 0.f- Vkiti � £ b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? '1(14 r� nti/o c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: (1 • (>1 E4',nin rrcr, 8 - . Environmental Checklist . • • 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? fir( (---at, EV-4 g--eirjA b. Could light or blare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? rif 0 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? . U0 A/awv' d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N C11� 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? ra'r k• L' ) \I AI b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Mc) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on.recreation, including-recreation • opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: CA,3,eit/U 13. HISTORIC.AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION • a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or • cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Ule\kVI/VW c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: W PA-4— 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to. the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. ' Environmental Checklist r b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? • c. _ How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. • -Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,-or,improvements.to..existing.'roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally:describe..(indicate.•whether..public or private? /61 5-- e. Will the project use (or occur .in •the immediate:.=vicinity=of) ::water,::rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. l.' f. How many vehicular•trips-per day:would be!generated:by..the completed.project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. ✓l y� �/Vl 0 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: AUk Yo c �,,h�,.. I \9([ D , 15. PUBLIC SERVICES . a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire • protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. • Y�� b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, If any. Ot,t;:i nit 41 VI/ft 01'\- 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utiliti urrently 'able at the site: el ctri 'y, nat ral as, ater fuse service,tel ho e, sanit ry s er, septic system, o 10 . J Environmental Checklist b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be nee .ed. P./wet 6LO Gam- -� S 0 v1.A-9 ' f1-€- -5Z W' r{U v•-. C. SIGNATURE _I, .the.undersigned, state that to the best.of my knowledge-the.above information is true and complete. . It.-is.understood that the.lead agency may :withdraw. any:declaration -of non- significance that it might.issue in .reliance upon this•checklist.should there be .any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Pit4/11Pro onent: (-17)/129 in& Name Printed: till Il Cl �� Date: • 11 Environmental Checklist . • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS • should only be used for.;actions.:. nvolvrng,,;declsi'OWi in polecies laps and • rora t.�:::.. 0 m Yo da:no> ee .: I: ... ................ t.n d.ta fil .ouf�thesesheets�:o :: P.. ... .f r. ro ect:acflonsU:::::<:m»<:«:<::>:<m«:::;:::>::< Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the' list of the elements of the environment. • • . ..When answering these questions, be aware of the extent.the proposal, or the types of activities likely.to.result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate • . : than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly.and in general terms. 1. .. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to_water,•:emissions to air,.production, . . . .storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production.of-noise? . ... Tuiri + Cf y-(4G� 1 Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: • 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish,.or marine life? • Al( • .. ••Proposed•measures to protector conserve plants,animals, fish,•or marine life are: 3.. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy ornatural resources? Mfit Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: • 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? 117/ Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?,, 7/4 • • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: • 12 Environmental Checklist 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? 1o7 lJ Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: • 7. Identify, if"possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. aki,k4Ato/u SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw. any .declaration -of non- significance that it might issue in reliance .upon this checklist should..there.be 'any willful misrepresentation or 'Iful lack of full disclosure on/Ii my part. Proponent: • 6(I l'Li ("'"Le C— r Name Printed: Ci-40 (A.,(7, LA b0 ) U P Date: l 0 REVISED 9/94 • • • • • 13 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 10/16/97 08 : 17 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9706604 Amount: 2, 527. 52 10/16/97 08 : 16 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1006 DALLY HOME Init: LMLV Project # : LUA97-155 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees : 2 , 527.52 This Payment 2 , 527 . 52 Total ALL Pmts : 2 , 527 . 52 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 .345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 2, 000 . 00 000 . 05 .519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 27. 52