Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA97-159
• • PO WELL SHORT PLAT MAP City of Renton (---- -) LEGEND City of Renton (_-__)_ SEC.30, TWP.23N., RGE.5E., W.M. O SET s/6•REBAR&CAP"HDA' CITY OP RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON • •FOUND/ACCEPTED REBAR&CAP 1 AT MONUMENIED LOT CORNER / LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS DECLARATION VISITED:SEPT.,1997. / (P)-PUT DATA / LOT 1 : KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE THE 40' 40' % PARCEL A BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER DF LOT 7,BURUNCTON NORTHERN, UNDERSIGNED OWNER(S)OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED (R)-CITY DO RENTON SURVEY SEE / SP 378-79 A BINDING SEE PLAN.ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF RENTON BINDING DO HEREBY MAKE A SHORT PLAT SUBDIVISION CONTROLR NETWORK SITE PLAN RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO.9206302696. THEREOF PURSUANT TO RCW 58.17.040 AND DECLARE NAD 19&T/91 DETAIL "A" / IN TH SF 161 OF PUTS.PACES B AST UNE it INCLUSIVE;THENCE THIS SHORT PLAT TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION NORTH 0150'6'EAST ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID LOT 7 A OF THE SAME,AND THAT SAID SHORT PLAT IS MADE // N NORTHEAST,THE C CENTER TO A WHICH POINT A A CURVE.CONCAVE TO THE CENTER OF BEARS NORTH ALONG EAST 120.00 WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH �I / FEET DISTANT;THENCE IN A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC THE DESIRES OF THE OWNER(S).IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE -_ N 8T50'7•W OF SAID CURVE PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5212.08•A HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS. END.RENTON-,----.-.. -- ---- DISTANCE OF 109.33 FEET;THENCE NORTH 3653'1Y WEST 173.08 FEET 359.16' TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE.CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST,HAVING A CONTROL MOH.1699 ��-��- 1.5'BRASS CAP IN / RADIUS OF 120.00H FEET;THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID OURVE, �LL -t aJ� PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3614.56•A DISTANCE OF 75.92 1/23/95 CASE z z �S �--".'---1 name m $, 20'UNUTV ESM'T FEET TO A PONTE ON THE EAST MARGIN WHICH ICHD AVENUE AND A CURVE. Y u+ _ m REC.NO.9206302696 CONCAVE80 TO74 THE WEST.TOE;THENCE OF SOU BEARS NORTH 79 ALONG to 11i'_ ,a REST RC OF FEET CURVE, P SSINCE IN A SOUTHERLY L ANGLE ALONG La &C.NO 02 THE ARC OF SAID CURVE,PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30I INGRESS.TOFA EGRESS Ik UTUTY N R REC.NO.8110210541 01'41'05'A DISTANCE OF 23.72 FEET;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID Name Name MD.RENTON z 9 p REC. O.F003281 STEEL CORP. w`B MARGIN.SOUTH 1150'11'NEST 178.07 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CONTROL MON.1494 PEG NO.9803291895& "' CURVE,CONCAVE TO THE EAST,THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 1.5'BRASS CAP IN REC.NO.9607030996 jo 8071'03'EAST 1958.05 FEET DISTANT;THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF CONC.IN CASE��� 0z SAID CURVE AND MARGIN,PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF I certify that I know or how satisfactory evidence that 1 23 g5 0119'30'A DISTANCE OF 45.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF elgned NIe Inetrument, oath elated Nat ha / / I w SAID LOT 7;THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH DNE OF SAID LOT 7,SOUTH authorized to execute the Instrument and aaknowleged that he was _.,,,Del),• wl m Nz 8995'25•EAST 306.59 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. the of the corporation and It woe the Y.'ow- {1e•1 ^ x�w -an free and voluntary act of such party for the uses end purposes tk°5 1`s3 n 1Z=n 3 - LOT 2 LOT 2: mentioned In the Instrument ol� COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7.BURUNCTON N8750'4YW a __ o 6 m 4,, '4.42 acres N I 1 (LUA-94-157-LLA) NORTHERN,A BINDING SITE PLAN.ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF RENTON BINDING SITE PLAN RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. Signature of 2 d 1 10. 9206302698,IN VOLUME 161 OF PLATS,PAVES 8 THROUGH 11 Notary Public i I� INCLUSIVE;THENCE NORTH 0150'09'EAST ALONG THE EAST UNE 6 Dated I 's ,-10 SAID LOT 7 A DISTANCE OF 18.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING My appointment expires DETAIL "A" w 40 ew0w _•I r-UTILITY ESM'T AND A POINT ON A CURVE.CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST,THE CENTER OF REG.NO.9206J02696 WHICH BEARS NORTH 00'54'35'EAST 120.00 FEET DISTANT;THENCE IN TIES TO RENTON NETWORK CONTROL v,�J m Z 1 A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE PASSING State of Washington (NOT TO SCALE) I1 THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5212'08•A DISTANCE OF 109.33 FEET; County of LOT 7 -I 70' -1--EASEMENT FOR WETLAND PROTECTION THENCE NORTH 3853.17'WEST 173.08 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OFF A I BINDING SITE PLAN FOR I 0.F NO.9206302702(EXHIBIT'F) CURVE.CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST,HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET; • I AND EXHIBIT'A'-WC ESN'T UNDER THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID WRVS,PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL A BURLINGTON NORTHERN 11 REC.NO.9602081399 pNdE OF 3fi14'S6'A DISTANCE 6 75.92 FEET TO A POINT ON THE I certify that I know or haw satisfactory evidence that CURVE I RADIUS I DELTA 1 LENGTH j wi 4 BSP NO. 014-92 a, - EAST MARGIN OF UND AVENUE AND A CURVE,CONCAVE TO THE VEST,THE signed this Instrument,on oath stated Cl 1958.05' 0119.30' 45.28' I __ CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 7950'53'WEST 806.74 FEET DISTANT; that he as authorized to execute the Instrument and acknowleged that Z N N IT -r o THENCE IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND he was the of the corporation and It was the CO 06.74' 0618'23' 94.69'.80' W I • 6 MARGIN,PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04'37Y8•A DISTANCE free and voluntaryt of such partyfor the uses and CO 20527' 02'3B'34' o act purposes C{ 806.74' 04.3718' 23.72' I I z OF 65.07 FEET TO THE 57NNING OF A CURVE,CONCAVE TO THE NEST, mentioned N the Instrument N 8899'S1•W HATING A RADIUS OF 205279 FEET;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE ARC CS 120.00' 3614'56' 75.0Y Q .iC I ID I� OF SAID CURVE AND MARGIN,PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF CO 120.00' 5212'08' 109.33'. ar I 357.02' -_'�'T - 0238'34'A DISTANCE OF 94.69 FEET;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MARC] 120.6' 5212'6' 0 w r nature of 11 EASTg357.02 FEETN NORM I4'29'EAST TO THE EAST6UNE OFF SAID LOT675THENCE ALONG NOUTH 8899'51' otary Pubic 'j --1 75 /-E F NM0.920830WEILAND2702 PROTECTIONF') SAID UNE SOUTH 0150'09'WEST 181.93 FEET;THENCE CONTINUING Dated 'J a n I TO BE M920030 BY ALONG SAID UNE SOUTH 28'33'51'NEST 218.70 FEET;THENCE My appointment expires z I I SEPARATE DOCUMENT CONTINUING ALONG SAID UNE SOUTH 01'50'09'WEST 112.00 FEET TO 58796'45'E(RAD)I THE POINT OF BEGINNING. m 1 State of Washington 1 2 I County of L -4 70' I PROPOSED 70'EASEMENT FOR LOT 3 I I> U I 1297 arnest I I WETLAND PROMOTION. COMMENCIURUNGTON NORTHERN.AG A BINDING T THE Ssap PLAN,ACCORDING TOOUTHEAST CORNER OF T THE 7.BOTY OF RENTON APPROVAL J BINDING SITE PLAN RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. I / 9206302696,IN VOLUME 161 OF PLATS.PAGES 8 THROUGH 11 /• IT I TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS INCLUSIVE;THENCE NORTH 0150'09'EAST ALONG THE EAST UNE OF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC __ 4 ` / / SAID LOT 7 A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET:THENCE CONTINUING ALONG WORKS DEPARTMENT &MAINTENANCE ESM'T TO / SAID UNE NORTH 28'33'51'EAST 218.70 FEET;THENCE CONTINUING SW 39TH - " CITY OF RENTON REG.NO. tv ALONG SAID UNE NORTH 0150'09'EAST 181.93 FEET TO THE POINT OF APPROVED THIS-DAY OF 19_. = U y,� 9206302701 0^'y BEGINNING;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID UNE AND BEARING 534.E STREET LOT 3 FEET TO THE NORTH UNE OF SAID LOT 7;THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH �� c `SIX 30'ACCESS EASEMENT ry�h�' ANTE.NOR 0 '4� WESTAID N.110 FEETTO THE EAST MORON OF�ND Administrator,Planning/Building/Public Works Department 3 _ C REG NO.9206302696 k ryTH0 (signatures of City of Renton officials) I J REC.NO.9206302702 / _ (LUA-94-157-LLA) FEET;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MARGIN SOUTH 0014.29'WEST 154.60 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 8899.51'EAST 357.02 FEET TO THE W 1 �. 2\\ Z$� / / POINT OF BEGINNING. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR I 5=-1 ` \\��' `C1, / / APPROVED THIS-DAY OF 19_ ii:1 .r; ( HORTON DENNIS 8 ASSOCIATES,INC. I m 1f \\'4•\ . r`'H�•o I W CONSULTING ENGINEERS ' p10 I o Director,Development Services Division z 1 \ H� 320 Second Ave.South WAC 332-130-100 I 1 3s,729 ea.n. '�r^o n 1 1 (signatures of City of Renton officials) 0.84 acres Kirkland WA 9 8033-66 87 EQUIPMENT USED: TOPCON GTS-3C, I \ \ �425)822-2525 5"THEODOLITE/E.D.M. I / \ - no KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS • WAC 332-130-090 I lJ/580.3ro3:c(R -i--_' ,,,�...yyyy- z Examined end approved this_day of 19_ SURVEY PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE I 1 T \` I LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AS PER WAC 332-130-090,PART C. I __ _306.59• 1 r T N B9.0525 W 18.00' This SHORT PLAT correctly represents a survey King County Assessor Deputy King County Assessor Ex.20'RAILROAD RP,-I IX 24'BLDG SETBACK UNE made by me or under my direction in conformance PER REC.NO.815040070 with state and county statutes 100 50 0 TOO 200 300 _20'UTIUTY EMT ���� REC.NO,9206302698 In .oSTa4.., 1997. RECORDING NO. SCALE IN FEET [..� RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE SCALE: 1'=100' LEGAL DESCRIPTION c..MtCkf AEA G. MICKIE filed for record this day of 19 at M d-i TdU 4 MERIDIAN:PER BURLINGTON NORTHERN BINDING SITE PLAN EXISTING PARCEL S.-"crIli,- •,- e'.,,i, Certificate No. 17672 in book of at page at the request of LOT 7 OF BURUNGTON NORTHERN,A BINDING SITE PLAN. ., r.t" HORTON DENNIS&ASSOC.,INC. NOTE: ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF RENTON BINDING SITE PLAN t, y THE BOUNDARIES,AS SHONE,ARE BASED UPON THE RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO.9206302696, '•, 61 OF PLATS, BURUNGTON NORTHERN BINDING SITE PLAN AS RECORDED PAGES BAS PER PTHROUGII RECORDEDLAT 11. ECO VOLUMEIONS COUNTY: #4',P•'PE187 ' INCLUSIVE.UNDER RECORDING IN VOLUME 161 OF PLATS, NO.92 63026S 8 696.iRECIRDS d4.4L LAND 9 Supt. KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF CANTON,COUNTY 6 KING, Flaws a/n/� p Mgr. Su t of Records STATE OF WASHINGTON. „ 4Y SHEET 1 of 1 HDA Job No.9747.00 • • I F(0ND • • e I e-tt O .a zo D w 6o Ito CO I I F- 1')1 .II •I �i I W p ,v —— - scALE IN FEET 0)I . 1 m�.e_ a _.__. -- ., II .4 .. -_ ry Bry, =a.�se a omu 4 ®� -`_1e - �� '-4-- .0,G : A �';'t 44."A — — LIND AVENUE _ �—— -— — LIND AVENUE PROJECT DATA • : �µ -1��•��•i�1. � �•Wr10.uStw Via.,' __- `�_ —re _ ' ' "��I' 19N4T MTA SI1G 191.r06 SF �1.iS� le 1 +.� R 2051 _ --- l 1092{\ � � - • c:7"'le � i�a►"'r��S� Inv BUILDING AREA, {9.660 5F - B. / \ \\\ I,.�.16..-I,y '/„> ,.. / ,/ '/ '� .� n xDF / -�- I. -1 ! I`V,Y PLANT {o.coD SF ' L- °° �.e 1.a ° / ; wl �v.•, 1 �. 1 1.. 5P®�OG MEZZANINE STORAGE 3.660 SF Si Q i/' • I i.. ,,, y % . ; N 10 i \�•\\ TOTAL SWARE FOOTAGE(FOOT PRINT) {6.b00 SF / L____--nu • «M AMIPERCENTAGE OF LOT COVERAGE 2AF . ^ ,,, ,e /'PROPOSED PROPER _ / I,/d' UNE(362.20') ,y --\ 1D.!V.`�:,--51.11:' m II ,� PARKING AN NYSIS: 1 ..r ,., -� TR, °Q ,., r: _ $� 1- tllf i _- REQUIRED DUSTRIAL k STORAGE , ", I '�-y� ■ / ��-` � - I I 1 -% (1/1500 SF)K 45.680 SF 29 SPACES B. I I m / ose I / (5/1,000 SF)K 6,000 SF I6 SPACES •9� g' i 1 I \/ TOTAL REQUIRED n SPACES B. �• )glq 1 ,I I PRONDEP v. ,•, n. / 3 /-�\' - 8 F�'d 1 iI\I9'.18) 65 SPACES @_. 1SPUN x 1 1 \11 2HANOBGP.12'.16') a�A¢SLOT7 n,L , ,u 1 n. ]m ,P ee e' Ie14 `I\\ TOTAL PRONDEo Q SPACES ' I. /V -\ u j! I I ylil • 'INTERIOR PARKING LOT L NDSCAPING T,{00 SF ,.. �,. 1 1 / \ U.S.RENTALS :T\ w ,,. / R-.;1� \ / / �� \\ / 1 I \\ ALL O1HER LANDSCAPING 16,mo ss\\ ...•.,� % . .E ,.. l..iiae:ra \\ zdnNOI N\\ _'i K1 / / 1 y ��\ Lam- _ ' \\\ \` aF' '9UILOwc NOR 2s' > -- n_ ,., ,.. �„a i ,. I•'�. 1 ,:•I 1� I if 1j11 .off N .>`--__��_ 'r \ T •. �]--- £ e•TypA, Y�'a .yT �I �ll\\\ \\\i . .\ � - 1e- u I _ � to I \\\_/ / NO130'08'i ]1i9Y � ` - \ !�_\\ ' ! — n I1-\\-- I T;;;M � I \-Jiii 1ll . AM I • ILi T TREECE S COMPANY YFiENGINEERING AND OEVEwFMH CONSULTANTS :" —J1�1` :: ' ''_- 1- \\_ _ _'r¢_ </ / �/\ ic>aae�miv•.a•m_— Jh \\---=__->_�=-_ i STEEL CITY OF RENTONe\---- �,— - - FARWEST - - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSACT III SITE PLAN HOMEBASE UNIFIRST CORPORATION RENTON,WASHINGTON ECOIGNEM GAT. GATE a/U/cT ME NANO Ul MT m] i ',lin it .giu ii' '?.'.:if.:;,%;Itil 1 ... 41 . . o, ,,,:igli .-2 ( Nx 51 e:. , .r•'a 0'e ole..13OSt:1 et of ;t'Y O two,s•:.vnr•. >p • F :,„ 'N f I ° .;r s / I �\ 1 J , .ill. Z R lo;i/ �� IS .p i ' N I P I' Y. B Nx _ ,I �'PN ( D 5 2 I�\\ oise i .32 I �1 /f^1 � %/ If'S< :I9 1P._1'li)P Ili 1,,,,,i :l F.o \ \I Q2 i tAri:z 'z C IIs�.;Or ,;:�, ;7 )m Ili ll.•ll '. 1 1 / I 11 0 5 \N1. I f 141 5ii.0 gl . III=11111L==111111=1 ii II II g g. ` i :F',=1I IIII=III , ° a" t_ \ \ 1 P; .,. l:. : II =NI_Ilf e , 111111=111 i t 3 a i'% 111=11111=.' • I I =11111L==111111=111111 f '_ °9.41 - IIIIII=111 LI—IIII"i irailiii 0 ... srY.+.�.0 to •'' (I�r UR W ;q __ 4:ti:a... ,_..!-..- am,„.„.1I4:a ter ill I gl .....w' ei vii 2 to, >' l; , � I�1 -roc , 11 t 4 _t;I i i, i s i 4 v up 5 o c z s C. Mg 34' y ; 1]' N — — `'� { I fit ri,w. T°i 1 O 1 / i rl=llrili= 11��:,I(IM 9 'T 1' t Illp it O,I 1111 ;011 YYY g10, 6 Elh pi DINTill*, . . „::§,--#,,..." . , Ik4 ' z„-g 1- 4-2! 1 PH I a M ig> a its 0 b PFP' Ir IA to too 2 M PO E E`m E E H§fix R_ M a PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN, SCHEDULE, NOTES, & DETAILS ',DUB ! : �� F tl r , p g s s s ;I' a alit UNIFIRST CORPORATION ;' 1q t CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON & Q 1 , 1 . I I 2 ii 1 I: r . \ , . 1 11 . \ \ „ 1 . I 1 , 1 m . ! . . 1 .. , - S.W.34TH I i I 1 II 11) :.FAsTELST ,_ _ .,..: . . i; i 1111 - '111 I • • al...,...1 ....,:.,., , . ../.......,. ___,_ . , ,,,,,..............,.s i Ilaimurns. UNIFIRST 1--PARKING--1 . 1-'---f -. liC alir 4:.> .4 c,[ Emm 1----I t at 1.1111116 a17 al .•,. ,7_1 2;<'. II=■ ••• '----. b Ilr""til 1 t=1 1 2.°'---1 I--=-1 I-I I- E .39TH ST. 1 /li'L.' a-1 I-I 1-1. //' n . I--°-1 IT; 1 - 1.. .7.. 17 ..=.11=31, VALLEY M 1.IC RAILROAD RAN ...,•• ----. i______,1 illnii...1 AIM El s ,:. ........„ , S.W.ATIST ST. \ " ,..g -.in. MI ' , 0 ------ I ani sf OMMII .1) 1LEVMEDL Brir ' e- . . Arika 1 • Bow I Q MI . iim1I1 1 .. Gi L '0 .. :A 43RD ST. ,.•Ersio ••:1.•: 1. • •::,•:j I.•I ,,- • oo war Ari=111 J,....,„ '''... . . -- . ..,. .. . 1 . . . , ....... . .... , ,. . „..., NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP "..0 UNIFIRST • ... • IS G MO • --,•,„,, e 00....00, - --Al1.--......- ^ 0 ••••• . .. 40 20 0 40 80 120 ,• ' 0•••••••••••, 8 =,....-; - .1, 1... . :::- to 4 I . 4.1 -,...... ._, ............. _-_:_..._.....,.. .__ .............. -.-..0.0.0. SCALE IN FEET , Il./ p ,....... (.0 . . os ni CO •• 'co.? EC •P - irdte6 • . 4,1.. ' . • -s/;-_W;a--_;3l.7,,i•f-/,Oji-.--1,,/-Rl 4,-,,,t„1_"34,;i1 1,_o1 1r7._.v 4'-,1:-./„--.•---1.-2N...1-. ..a_L'r7T,,c„6n-'.,-7A62L.-.-.4.-c--...m:--/!-•,-,..-.-.---,--.-„-:._.--•.-_„_',.a--t-t•.- •i'9'''.._-_- ,-,'•,.__'-'_'1)_'-,'1 11a i,..5*'.,•.P1,.1.F.1F.'',„1•=L-•11M,.L-[I>,1E.'N',Z.2..„U..DI.zIi1.2--M 1--,,D,r1L1n.U1.A„1.01 W,1 V—_\1.„• ....E,7,„,—,:.aN..•=1,UA11...1 __-------,--,?. ."-...--±. A'_,_„U7._._.1._b_.1l"1,b,R0,.-e,1„,.1_.,_,_..,_c...7..71:I3 1I3 EI.mI2N"I.a.,I:I11I,.1.U1Ic11;4I1IitM1qza1a1M•1wIiIi11:Ii.M,.a.Rm1-I.aA.LNi.Im ilo1.7g1A.1‘,1:i,1\.t1'Mu''''t.rM4la"iltIi-1h=iiivi1rl4riIi1lIliIr l.isb" l\iiui ihe r; LI_SSNP-_N•._ND . AVENUE TTTTOOOOTTTTAA.ALLLOPM FUEPRSSFZAQIA ITNPZCUREETAEAICR PROJECT AGE E(DATA m 7ICE14. - iFM _ BULDNGAEA PR INT) 1144461953959..670060008000602200004406 S . SSSSSSSFFFFFFF "-----_,_,, ,• ,., LE.Irltata. I t7• AZ ''' ' 11 ' -4 -N-.1.-1' 1 i'. ‘," • ) „‘ PROPOSED LOT 2 1 • _ m• .7 ,..,\,..„ • S'R - 1 • 1 "' ' — •.. PLANT 4. 201.5.X 20/V 1 i lj: * • . :.. IVA°. / ASP NO.04-92 2= 4.• \ 1 ... Ili 4 U.S.RENTALS hj N. 79,/, ••, ,_,,,./." • - •-..,___ NOTE ALL ROCA DRAMS VOITLAlc... • aS . .- '''' '• n. I ret= / - -.. •'' ' '. uo DJ SAMTARA Mk. - ) ) \ ig '• i I 1(1\ / -- 1113 EDI EU.' • .1 on I ?; - N., \-1,--,-"-- ••• / hi 1___ . , ,J1 '' 1110',‘.2'2 WATER•ALITA POO • . , illS\N‘ . .:,93.,:, - --, -• ,., - .1. ;:" ••• a4:Viiii \ , ......---"--- ----) i0AgrAl III • . . .... 9 ' Allith .C. .••••,,, _ 1 351----".---------''' traltilIN&V NA rff=1 -=i 'L""Ilbj21‘11 LA11.11111 r\\ fli zL.....".,...,... . IIIP 40111111111.11....11.1.114fr II I 1 \ "t ---n------1 if--- Alglii 4111111 7 , . 1 . . V .8., -A N., . - \ (PROPOSED LOT 3-POWELL SHORT PUT OF LOT 7 EtNEISP) . aal. TREECE 8 COMPANY _.---__-_-_-_- --2,-.."( . • .• / ..- .7\ MA It 12.07.1, '..1.01 III LE 1 LE RA1.1601 */ i i . i i,... FARWESTENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 11: =Ps..pa,.so.ito MAMA 10.00„0,1„OM „De Mg An-SSAT TAX(201,=AA. -_:..--___=--!-.-_="-::----==-%':', MM.11-.1630 S'fEEL CITY OF RENTON - ----=----=----,er-4--- -_===--,.,==./ SCAD1 13. ACT III DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS tl I ms K.., PRELIMINARY Fcc Review/Approvala Oly PRELIMINARY GRADING,DRAINAGE,WATER NOT 1 HOMEBASE FOR CONSTRUCTION AND SANITARY SEWER PLAN I • =FIRST CORPORATION-RENTON,WASHINGTON 0610.E.EMT. COIL,,,,,, Au„.,„ ORAION. R 5 IA CHEMED.0 MT. • • _. • 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 in or°., ,. ai l A • 00 o - =rll° • 0 ul ( FM P11 PETALS MD 'Pt AlI`• L P�,�aMa 10=1-4.STIP9101 :I � ° °° gag, LL PAP PIT 0 O I i ■ e 08u 1 .,A.eKK i I O 12,11 Pia. to ml e „�°am-;, a :dp»r r I, , ,.. • r �g I ._ i , lol 1 Fri E. CA.° ,_o• Top LO o oIRI ,�6� — wq PEE.PPP FIR Z o = o ji—•— —a - 1 zP UP o 1 O ..= jlT . CI —L.CP MELIANINE ABOVE WEE DELTA V , ,I .- Po ; __ + o •0 0 0' o, ,.a, oe _ 14> ) PLAN a°.x -''�'a a NORTH Q ° FLOOR PLAN FP UniFlrst — Renton, Wa. ©_ ,-0, 66.97 - • - .. . • Ell . ts, oi co 1 c? Q._0)(7-\ ® , 0 o pa...Wil 0 cl,) ,C ..6 La- I : I i ' 1 ' r i\ if • ',,,,,2-:,...... - CO — PL1. I' '''''—' 1.0 1.0 '''''" • . ..............,i,iii••• iiiiii 1 AM--17.1.111.117' 1 TEP P."°"•" I frzczg rim nom + .1tI7 II 103, I,O NORTH ELEVATION • 15...E. am-r-cr Z 0 ® 0 — 0 0 0 • DAUM IaR-1.1 RCP.5/1711 =Or? ur II HMI r :1111111 r --____________, 7.7,..7. , II -i-.1.1 .{. , . , I ,-- is —' A 0/ ,,:.ro,, ' .' . . " 4 ......,,.:.•a...... k'''''''''s' 1—t- .... / .,. .. • SOUTH ELEVATION SCAM .. ' In . ; 0 ' 0 (ID CD MN VS41 trtol MI. i 4, ii:P2'0%.11E. H I ' I . I 1-. OM 1.. ir MOM ono ---7•_ I il —ML M 11 M_____ ___. .,- . ,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,• ...W."' MO MI.S11.0 0.01 Dill MC. KU Lr COM SLID.WM NM LEI M.3COM WEST ELEVATION 2 SOLE 101,01,061. . 9 1 9 CT) . 0 0 0 • 1 : QOM WM f _......._. 10 _______„ I— ----6 . LPN.Irtr; .--. L a .M. 0 M. A ,-,m. 1 IN RCM .. _.• s :II 10Y-0. 6 ......---___ null LK I t _ Mr Mr MOM OM M!a MC. . ...ah•01,1•MS It '.'..'i."-) ECTAS SI SFO. UNIFIRST—RENTON, WA.• EAST ELEVATION ., scALE - EE 6.6.97 . . . • I - , After Recording return to: WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: 95O1O58 cot Office of the City Cleric PAGE 001 AOFTu02COV 9.00 c:rx Renton City Hall 08/15/2000 11:43 © 1055$uutli Grady Way KING COUNTY, UA a Renton, WA 98055 Lel 1 DECLARATION OF COVENANT cct Q IN CONSIDERATION of the approved City of Renton Building permit for application a No. 8990733 relating to real property described as follows: Lots 2 and 3 of City of Renton Short Plat LUA—97-159-SHPL as recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 9805219013, all situate in the Southwest quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., City of Renton, King County, Washington. li The undersigned, Pacific Gulf Properties, Inc., as Grantor, declares that the above described property is hereby subject to a covenant for review of parking needs and hereby covenants to the City of Renton(Grantee) as follows: Tenant parking needs shall be analyzed prior to building permit issuance, including tenant improvements. If the ultimate user of the property exceeds the number of employees from what is expected for a typical warehouse/distribution use or is a fleet-based user with higher parking demands, then further environmental review and additional parking may be required prior to issuance of a building permit and/or business license. i 1 i • DATED at ' , c,,,ageteh?..,, c, .3 this )s� �6�J�'lday of , 2000. 2:65pm PaGL. (Pacific Gulf Prop s, I c.) By: ah By: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) )ss. COUNTY OF 0rQY!'1, ) On this 3/ day of 2000 before me,the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Cag nf& ; duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared a` ' ,r f 44/i/e' and `-1, er Pelee to me, known to be the Ji o ice-reSiderj f' andSenioyikciasglittrespectively, g Pacific Gulf Properties, Inc.,the urt corporation that executed the covenant and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein set forth, and on oath stated that they were authorized to sign said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. 0 WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Given under my hand and official seal this 3161-- day of n , 2000. OPIA: Notary's Signa e NOTARY,P LIC in and for the "`° I _ Cell State of Co.]; 111(0.- Residing at: 2/ j W. SklenS )4V>° San -Arial [ GYIca 9a707 My Commission Expires: Ow. 9,aO03 2 g7-151, 51, 01 - 4 City of Renton InterOffice Memo To: Larry Warren, City Attorney From: Arneta Henninger, Board of Public Works Coordinator Date: May 11, 1998 Subject: Security Device Powell Short Plat LUA 97-159 Please review the attached document as to legal form. The purpose of this security device is to fulfill the Code requirement of furnishing proper security to the City to defer certain short plat required improvements. A copy of the Board of Public Works minutes is attached. If I may be of assistance in expediting this request please call me at 277-6198. CC: Neil Watts Yellow File LUA 97-159 Board of Public Works File CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: May 18, 1998 TO: Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator FROM: Arneta Henninger X6198 SUBJECT: POWELL SHORT PLAT LUA 97-159 LIND AV SW& SW 39TH ST The attached mylar is submitted for your review and signature. Technical Services and Developmental Services have reviewed and recommended approval for the short plat. The staff member who closes out short plats has reviewed and recommends approval for the plat. The BPW has deferred the sidewalks and an appropriate security device has been submitted and accepted. The yellow file is attached for your use. If you have any questions please call me. Thank you. cc: Neil W. ^'r!Y OF RENTON MAR 1 1993 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 16, 1998 TO: Neil Watts, Plan Review Supervisor Sonja Fesser, Property Management FROM: Arneta Henninger, X6198 SUBJECT: POWELL SHORT PLAT LUA 97-159 LIND AVE & SW 39TH ST FINAL REVIEW & APPROVAL FORM If all concerns have been addressed and you recommend recording of the mylar, please sign this memo below and return to me. Thank you. Approval: /V C.d I/V e/t6 3/7/Q g Name Title Date cc: Yellow File C RtOp RN1'ON MAR 13 1998 CITY OF RENTON Sup "�vU PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS t°'oN MEMORANDUM DATE: March 13, 1998 TO: Neil W.Plan Review Supervisor FROM: Arneta X6198 _p(si) SUBJECT: POWELL SHORT PLAT LUA 97-159 Please review the attached project. Please comment and let me know of any items that you are aware of for this project to complete prior to recording. They did come before the Board of Public Works for a deferral. Are there any civil plans that need to be submitted,approved? Sonja the calcs and Plat Cert. are in your packet. lZ.e- I fin Y'� c oVal Stvtt l k covcvrv( tici cows- u :110m pevwii i s �e�Gi)a 3ic./q CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 16, 1998 TO: Neil Watts,Plan Review Supervisor Sonja Fesser,Property Management • FROM: Arneta Henninger,X6198 Pt SUBJECT: POWELL SHORT PLAT LUA 97-159 LIND AVE & SW 39TH ST FINAL REVIEW & APPROVAL FORM If all concerns have been addressed and you recommend recording of the mylar, please sign this memo below and return to me. Thank you. Approval: W Cg Name Title Date Robert T. Mac Onie, Jr. Mapping Supervisor bei :tt) iy„ (iLoopz) cc: Yellow File U r�".`�,a yM.._ a._ • �r,,r., iiTPROPERT.., D;. k'E R 'VIEW FOR SUED_......`IONS No,-98-bow 1)t h ty . APPLI ��t� r�i (-tom P i{L I ,A e S ) tRECEIVED'FROM ,T 74{� .atr� ws (date) JOB ADDRESS: • L11.11� ,dV�� U>l= .-rick?" :� ,�j=' .orin/ -(}-F. iWO,' E3 E c1 NATURE OF WORK: 3 LND -220 PRELIMINARY REVIEW F SUBDIVISION LONG PLAT, NEE MORE'INFORMATIONO 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHORT PLAT,BINDING SITE PLAN,ETC. ' 0 ' ND iris 0 VICINITY MAP ❑ FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION,THIS REVIEW REPLACES 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 OTHER PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED j/ •.•�{-� 0 FRONT FOOTAGE ❑ SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID# j?5� -plop NEW KING CO.TAX ACCT.#(s)are required when assigned by King County. It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees arc subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. ❑ The existing house on SP Lot# ,addressed as has not previously paid SDC fees,due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be subject to future - - SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. - 14 We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to-reviewit'agaia before recordation. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSFSSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt) WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt) WASTEWATER -0 - Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER -O - Special Assessment District/WATER Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER /O - Joint Use Agreement(METRO) -O - Local Improvement District * -O - Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION -O - FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER 0 Estimated f/OF UNITS/ SDC FEE - 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd SQ:FTG. Single family residential$850/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park Apartment, Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq. ft.of property(not less than$850.00)x 'A7 4-:t3zt42 P4'':;+: $ la, 775. 5Z ti Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER 0 Estimated ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential$585/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment, Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial$0.078/sq. ft.of property x(not less than S585.00) A ,4� $ I O,cTGO.Oq , SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER 0 Estimated 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x All other properties$0.129sq ft of new impervious area of property x -re,15 UUlwalr�tl 4. c (not less than$385.00) 2 �v tl _ -ruts 1D,+s,-,-E � Qp sic PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ * U1.11-C3-101, --1 Cr" , ji 2) . Or.) I/3OlcipiI��1= . Signatu of Rwing Authority DA E 1Q ❑ 'If subject property is within an LID,it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. K� ❑ Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. ❑ Current City SDC fee charges apply to e c:/template/feeappl/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16. 1995/Ord. Nos. 4506. 4507. 450R- 4525. and 452.E CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: May 18, 1998 TO: BPW FILE FROM: Arneta H. X6198 A.94 SUBJECT: POWELL SHORT PLAT LUA 97-159 LIND AV SW& SW 39TH ST The security device is in and Larry Warren, City Attorney, has approved as to legal form. Please post the attached security device from SeaFirst Bank L/C G195703 in the amount of$34,236. There should be a tickler file on or around the first of March 1999 to determine if device needs to be extended or if sidewalk improvements have been installed. No further action is required at this time. cc: Neil W. y�ow BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS 8:30 a.m. Renton Municipal Building Wednesday, March 11, 1998 5th Floor Conference Room IN ATTENDANCE: Jim Hanson, Chairman Larry Meckling, Building Official Dave Christensen, Utilities System Jim Gray, Fire Prevention Arneta Henninger, Plan Review Dennis Gerber, Police Department Mickie Flanng,an,Recording Secretary VISITORS: Bart Treece,Powell/Unifirst Short Plat Joyce E. Jones,Lily Nelson Short Plat Lily A.Nelson, Lily Nelson Short Plat Helmut Brodka, Brodka Short Plat James Jacques,Jake Short Plat 2 MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Hanson Called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Moved by Christensen, seconded by Meckling to approve meeting minutes dated,February 25, 1998 with the following correction: In reference-Variance Request to underground Utilities, QFC development at NE 4th and Duvall Ave. NE. " Action: Moved by Christensen, seconded by Meckling to grant a variance to the utility pole on the corner of Duvall and NE 4th, and to underground all remaining utility poles along Duvall, as required by the Underground Ordinance. MOTION CARRIED " 3. REQUESTED ACTION: • OFF-SITE DEFERRAL,POWELL (UNIFIRST) SHORT PLAT, LUA 97-159,Lind Ave SW& SW 39th St- applicant requests a deferral for the installation of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Discussion: The applicant is in the process of purchasing an adjoining parcel (Lot 3) and would prefer to construct the required improvements in conjunction with site development of Lots 1, 2, and 3, allowing this facility to be undisturbed by other effects such as utility connections, driveway installation and site grading. Action: MOVED BY CHRISTENSEN, SECONDED BY MECKLING to grant a deferral to off-site improvements until March 31, 1999, subject to applicant posting a letter of credit or other acceptable security device in the amount of 150%of the estimated cost for completion of said improvements. MOTION CARRIED. • OFF-SITE DEFERRAL,LILY NELSON SHORT PLAT, LUA 97-146, 1517 & 1519 Aberdeen Ave NE- applicant requests a deferral for the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and driveway paving. Discussion: Paving of a shared driveway is required for the proposed short plat. Applicant is requesting deferral of driveway improvements until actual construction begins on either of the two lots, and a waiver to curb,gutter and sidewalk improvements. Action: MOVED BY GRAY,SECONDED BY CHRISTENSEN to grant a deferral of curb,gutter and sidewalks subject to the following conditions: 1) Paving of the shared driveway shall be done when construction begins on either of the two lots;and 2)that a Restrictive Covenant be signed agreeing to participate in any future LID or City initiated proposal for curb,gutter and sidewalks. MOTION CARRIED. • OFF-SITE DEFERRAL,BRODKA SHORT PLAT,LUA 98-025, 2005 NE 20th Street- applicant requests a deferral for the installation of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks along Aberdeen Ave NE and NE 20th Street. Action: MOVED BY MECKLING,SECONDED BY CHRISTENSEN to grant a deferral of curb,gutter and sidewalks subject to the following conditions: 1) Paving of the shared driveway shall be done when construction begins on either of the two lots;and 2)that a Restrictive Covenant be signed agreeing to participate in any future LID or City initiated proposal for curb,gutter and sidewalks. MOTION CARRIED. 4. OLD BUSINESS: • OFF-SITE DEFERRAL, JAKE SHORT PLAT, LUA 97-167, 1708 Aberdeen Ave NE- Tabled on February 25, 1998, for more information. Action: MOVED BY CHRISTENSEN, SECONDED BY GRAY to grant a deferral of installation of curb,gutter and sidewalks, subject to the following conditions: 1) Paving of the shared driveway shall be done when construction begins on any one of the five lots; and 2)that a Restrictive Covenant be signed agreeing to participate in any future LID or City initiated proposal for curb,gutter and sidewalks. MOTION CARRIED 5. REFERRALS FROM CITY COUNCIL: None 6. __ COMMENTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: None 7. CONSENT AGENDA: None 8. ADJOURNMENT: Chairman Hanson adjourned the meeting at 9:15 a.m. CIT = OF RENTON . ::ii Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 26, 1998 . .. Mr. Barton Treece, Jr., P.E. . . Treece &Company • 320 Second Avenue South,#200 Kirkland,WA 98033 SUBJECT: UniFirst Development Project No. LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF Dear Mr. Treece: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site PlanConditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to,contact me at (425)277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, Mark R. Pywe, , 'CP Project Manai er cc: UniFirst Corporation/Applicant . . Powell-Orilla Associates/Owners FINAL Doc 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 rwo This nailer contains 50%recycled material.20%cost consumer Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O.Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-400cDEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON MAR 0 2 1998 DATE: February 13, 1998 RECEIVED TO: Mark Pywell City of Renton, Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 167 MP 24.77 CS 1716 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-Unifirst Development-3 lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq. ft. to 192,561, sq. ft. and construct a 49,680 sq. ft. bldg. for a commercial laundry File No.LUA-97-159,SA,A,SHPL-A,ECF g(41\ift• trin FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE,Manager of Planning&Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North,MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project,which is located on the east side of Lind Avenue,north of SW 39th Street. Our response is below: We have reviewed this subject document and have no comments. /lie project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions,please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee • File Name • • RasSTATt yinfo oyn State of Washington .DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE 'ry >� Mailing Address: 600 Capitol Way N N.Olympia,WA 98501-1091 •(360)902-2200,TDD(360)902-22`d ' 0 a 499 Main Office Location: Natural Resources Building•1111 Washington Street SE•Olympia,WA e/ryoF7,� February 18, 1998 . 1IV4fNG Ms . Jana Huerter City of Renton Development Services Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 ' Subject: DNS- Mitigated Unifirst Development, LUA-97-159,SA-A, EFC. Dear Ms .- Huerter : The. Stormwater discharge from this project eventually discharges into Spring Brook Creek . Spring Brook creek supports both cutthroat trout and coho salmon. For the protection of fisheries resource in Spring Brook Creek we recommend that the stormwater discharge from this project meet the requirements of the Department of Ecology' s Stormwater Manual for the Puget Sound Basin . Thank you for sending the plans for this project for review. If you have any questions contact me at ( 425 ) 391-4365 . • I would like to thank you for your cooperation in our efforts to protect and perpetuate our state ' s fish and wildlife resources . • Sincerely, gjThr2 • Philip Schneider Area Habitat Biologist cc Ted Muller- Mill Creek, WDFW Rod Malcomb - Muckleshoot Tribe Rickard - Olympia, WDFW • R HomeBase° AMERICA S BEST HOME IMPROVEMENT WAREHOUSE RECEIVED February 16, 1998 FEB 2 3 1999 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Mr. Mark R. Pywell Project Manager Development Services Division City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: LUA-97-159, SA-A, SHPL-A,ECF/Unifirst Development Dear Mr. Pywell: We are in receipt of the Notice Of Application dated January 6, 1998, relating to the above referenced project. I have attached for your files a copy of a letter dated January 27, 1998, addressed to Powell-Orillia Associates, whereby HomeBase, Inc. advises the owner of the subject property that the proposed use on the property is in direct violation of the binding Reciprocal Easement Agreement ("REA") which covers the HomeBase, Eastgate Theater and Powell parcels. The REA restricts and prohibits any commercial laundry or dry-cleaning plant from operating on any parcel of land located within the REA boundary. Please be advised that HomeBase is very concerned about this proposed use on the subject property and we will enforce the use restrictions contained in the Reciprocal Easement Agreement. Very tru y urs, tephen L. Gale Manager of Real Estate cc: Powell-Orillia Associates .. Eastgate.Theaters,.Inc. Support Center Offices—3345 Michelson Drive, Irvine, California 92612 (714)442-5000 Homeilase AMERICA S BEST HOME IMPROVEMENT WAREHOUSE January 27, 1998 Mr. Peter W. Powell Powell-Orillia Associates do Powell Development Co. 737 Market Street 'Kirkland, Washington 98033 RE: Notice Of Application Project Number: LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A-ECF Renton, HomeBase Center Dear Peter: Last week we received notification of the proposed project referenced above. In our review of the First Amendment To Reciprocal Easement Agreement (REA), which was negotiated between HomeBase, Powell-Orillia Associates and Eastegate Theater, Inc. in 1996, we notice that the proposed use, as a 49,680 square foot commercial laundry plant is in direct violation of the Use Restrictions provision of the REA. Section 15.16, subsection "j" states the following: No portion of the Shopping Center shall be used for any of the following uses or purposes: j. "Any commercial laundry or dry-cleaning plant; provided, however, this prohibition shall not be applicable to any premises if oriented to pick up and delivery by the ultimate consumer and there are only nominal on-suite supporting facilities". Please be advised that HomeBase will not consent to allow for this type of use within the Lots that comprise the Shopping Center due to the environmental problems that this use may cause. Should you wish to discuss this matter further please call me. Very t ly ours, Ste en L. ale Manager of Real Estate cc: Eastgate Theaters, Inc. Support Center Offices—3345 Michelson Drive, Irvine, California 92612 (714)442-5000 • '•"'".***'***** '''•• • ••• . . •••""••""""•.•••••••.•."••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••......................... CURRENT PLANNING Dl VISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • , • On the SI day of vidorAtijim , 1998, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing siKovat 'Fist 1k-ran eta De_ctsicrn Sic- Ptah Reed" documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • GibtfiA .St3eibtA) UwIfitett Cew rr 13a.AevN "ilrecce. aviti Gwv‘i,lata.Ai Peux.11- Ort .. ttsSoc. • • • (Signature of Sender) ittlAtieek. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS • COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that S--Ar.d,ruk. Soze.f.61. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. , Dated: • Se 19qr( 1/4-71a . Notary PubligAn and for the State of Viffshington • ,••:„.• Notary (Print)pointment etomitymounemsFr_ • My ap COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 'Projet NaMe:,,ortv6 owe b f,vv‘eviCt • • Project Number: 1...up cn 1st% • 31k ei,6„ I sv‘pl;Pe ,EC.f NOTARY.DOC • r City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 4 & ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: DECISION DATE: February 5, 1998 Project Name UniFirst Short Plat Applicant UniFirst Corporation File Number LUA-97-159,SHPL Project Manager Mark R. Pywell, AICP Project Description Administrative Land Use Action (Short Plat Review) for the subdivision of an existing 8.23 acre lot into three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sf to 192,561 sf. Lot 3 would then be developed for a commercial laundry. Project Location East side of Lind Ave. SW, North of SW 39th Street Illk 1 'IN• il iri . ) .. gp)jiE_T -gr,,, INI. MI tell •..... r .,, , �u�o� I� A.„,.., �, ill , l imq AIM ...AIM ':i �1 ' w'QRph /' �, IP Q O �:il /� iA ' , It -. .V0( f At ilp Project Location Map SHPLTRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED February 5,1997;PROJECT LUA-97-159,SHPL Page 2 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Powell-Orilla Associates 2. Zoning Designation: Medium Industrial (IM) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Employment Area-Valley 4. Existing Site Use: Vacant 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Office Commercial/Industrial East: Office Commercial/Industrial South: Office Commercial/Industrial West: Office Commercial/Industrial 6. Access: Lind Avenue SW 7. Site Area: 8.23 acres C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Comprehensive Plan 4498 2/20/95 Zoning 4404 6/7/93 Annexation 4040 2/9/87 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities Water: Available in Lind Ave. SW Sewer: Available in Lind Ave. SW Surface Water/Storm Water: Available in Lind Ave. SW 2. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1) Medium Industrial: Section 4-31-11.2 2) Subdivision Ordinance: Section 9-12 3) Street Improvements: Section 4-34 shpltrpt.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED February 5,1997;PROJECT LUA-97-159,SHPL Page 3 F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1) Employment Area- Industrial G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Project Description/Background The applicant seeks to subdivide an 8.23 acre site into three lots to allow for the development of industrial buildings. The site is currently vacant. The applicant is also seeking approval of a site plan to develop Lot 3 for a commercial laundry. The site plan will be reviewed separately from the short plat. 2. Environmental Review Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), short plats are exempt from Environmental Review. 3. Compliance with ERC Conditions No mitigation measures required for the short plat. 4. Staff Review Comments Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. Consistency Short Plat Criteria Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established to assist decision makers in the review of the plat: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation The subject property is designated as Employment Area - Valley on the Land Use Element Map of the Comprehensive Plan. The objective of the Employment Area - Valley designation is to allow for a variety of commercial and industrial land uses to develop in this area that will support the economic development of the City of Renton. The proposed short plat will allow for the development of medium industrial facilities on this vacant lot. b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation The subject property is designated as Medium Industrial (IM) on the Zoning Map. Lots in the IM Zone must provide a minimum area of 35,000 sf. The applicant is proposing to create three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sf to 192,561 sf. These lots exceed the minimum area requirement for this zone. shpltrpt.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED February 5,1997;PROJECT LUA-97-159,SHPL Page 4 c) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Streets: No new streets will be created by this subdivision. All three of the lots being created will have direct access to Lind Avenue SW. The sidewalk has been completed along most of Lind Ave. SW except for the portion along the frontage of the proposed short plat. The applicant will need to install the Code-required street improvements, including but not limited to, the installation of the sidewalk along the entire frontage of the short plat. Blocks: No new blocks are being created by this short plat. Lots: As noted in Section 5 b., all of the lots will exceed the minimum area requirement for the IM zone. The IM zone does not require a minimum lot width or length. Lot 1 is a triangular shaped lot providing an area of 36,729 sf. Lot 2 is an irregularly shaped lot, due to past development of the area, and has an area of 129,426 sf. Lot 3 is roughly rectangular in shape and provides an area of 192,561 sf. d) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: All three of the lots being created have direct access onto Lind Avenue SW. Topography: The lots are all fairly level having been filled and graded a number of years ago. Relationship to Existing Uses:The valley area is developing for a variety of industrial and commercial uses. It is anticipated that the proposed lots will be developed for industrial land uses. e) Availability and Impact on Public Services(Timeliness) Police and Fire: Police and Fire Department staff state that they can provide service to this area provided that Code-required improvements are installed and that the buildiers provide adequate security measures. Recreation: N/A Schools: N/A Storm Water: The developers of these lots will need to provide storm water features as required in the King County Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. It should be noted that the City has adopted a program to upgrade the existing waterways in this area to address the flooding issues that have occurred in some areas. Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: Adequate utilities exists in this location to serve the anticipated development. H. DECISION: The Short Plat, File No. LUA-97-159,SHPL:is approved. NOTE TO THE APPLICANT All Code-required improvements, including but not limited to the sidewalk, shall be installed along Lind Ave. SW prior to the recording of the short plat. shpltrpt.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED February 5,1997;PROJECT LUA-97-159,SHPL Page 5 DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: J6 4 Pif /tfitefieffil Gregg A.Zim erm ,P/B/PW Administrator decision date TRANSMITTED this 6th day of February, 1998 to the applicant and owner: Power-Orilla Associates 737 Market Street Kirkland, WA 98033 Gary A. Bigelow UniFirst Corporation 1454 Kittrell Road Franklin, TN 37064 Barton G. Treece, Jr P.E. Treece&Company 320 Second Avenue S. #200 Kirkland, WA 98033 TRANSMITTED this 6th day of February, 1998 to the parties of record: None Listed TRANSMITTED 6th day of February, 1998 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official Art Larson,Fire Marshal Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal Land Use Action Appeals &Requests for Reconsideration The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14 day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a decision on a short plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the reconsideration request, if the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision,there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the following appeal timeframe. APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on February 19, 1998. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)235-2501. Appeals must be filed in writing,together with the required$75.00 application fee,to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. EXPIRATION DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire on February 5,2000(two years from the original approval date). An extension may be requested. shplfrpt.doc PO WELL SHORT PLAT MAP City of Renton (____--) LEGEND City of Renton (____) SEC.30, TWP.23N., RGE.5E., W.M. o SET 5/8•REBAR&CAP•HDA CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON •FOUND/ACCEPTED RERAN&CAP AT MONUMENTED LOT CORNER / LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS : DECLARATION VISITED:SEPT.,1997. / (P)-PLAT DATA j LOT 1 : KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE THE / PARCEL A UNDERSIGNED OWNER(S)OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED • (R)-OTY OF RENTER SURVEY SEE / A BINDINGG SITE PLAN.ACCORDING TO THE OTY OF RENTER aNDINGTM�• DO HEREBY MAKE A SHORT PLAT SUBDIVISION CONTRA NETWORK SP 37B-79 SITE PLAN RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO.9208303696, THEREOF PURSUANT TO RCW 58.17.040 AND DECLARE NAO 19e3/91 DETAIL "A" IN TH 01 f61 OF PLATS,PAGES 6 THROUGH it INCLUSIVE;THENCE THIS SHORT PLAT TO BE THE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION /' /• `� DORAN DISTANCE OF'Ds'0AFE ALONG TPE EAST UNE R SLID LCA 7 A OF THE SAME,AND THAT SAID SHORT PLAT IS MADE //I / \. 18.0E TER OFT A POINT ON A CURVE,CONCAVE4'35' TO THE "CCiI NORTHEAST.THE CENTER WHICH BEARS NORTH oosa'35•EAST 120.00 WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH �^ FEET DISTANT THENCE IN A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC THE DESIRES OF THE OWNER(S).IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE �N BT50'7•W f l � OF SAID CAME PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 521T08'A HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS. �,RENTON.���� , ,I.�..F J/ - DISTANCE OF 109.33 FEET;THENCE NORTH 3653'1T NEST 173.08 FEET CONTROL MON.1699 359.16 _i TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE,CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST,HATING A 1.5'BRASS CAP IN ----1� �� RADIUS OF 120.0E FEET;THENCE ALONG THE ARC CF SAID CURVE. CONC.IN CASE Za Z _ i ^F PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3014'56•A DISTANCE OF 75.92 Name • 1/23/95 Y Q, ---- -�� DO'UTILITY ESMY FEET TO A PONT ON THE EAST MARGIN OF UND AVENUE AND A CURVE._ NEC.NO.9208302695 CONCAVE TO THE WEST.THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 7950'53' 1A+..4 m WEST 806.74 FEET DISTANT;THENCE IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG Ur,8 &RAILROAD 021EES/FTTHE ARC CF SAID CURVE,PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF � Pa 30'INGRESS.EGRESS h UTUTY R REC.NO.8110210511 Borne Nam. END.RENTON a 9 y - ESM'T TO EARNEST STEEL CORP. 01Y1'05'A DISTANCE OF 23.72 FEET;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID REC.NO.980J291e95 k �g NATION,SOUTH 1150'I1•NEST 178.07 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CONTROL MOH.1494 .."" CURVE.CONCAVE TO THE EAST,THE CENTER OF TNIIGI BEARS SOUTH 1 SN BRASS CAP IN REC.NO.98070J0996 DI m 80'31'03'EAST 1958.05 FEET DISTANT;THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF CONC.IN CASE�S+. i I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that SAID C0'A AND NCR GIN, 5.2SI FEET THROUGH THE A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1/23/05 0.1 I hnI gd SAID LOT A DISTANCE OF 45.28 TO SOU SAID LOT CORNER OF to the Ines IneWmmt.an oath elated that he �ef'�Pl �rc SAID LOT 7;THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 7,SCUM was aulhrlxed to execute the IneWmmt and acknorlped that he was W I 0, 89I5'25'EAST 30559 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING the of the...Booth.and It eras the aye�se�•A1 del ^ $ a free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes a"',L819�'� dB ' 3 a, LOT 2 LOT 2 : mentioned I,the netmmenl 192.561 ea.iL 0I1 COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7,BURUNGTON N8750'{TW P ,AID viI I NORTHERN,A BINDING SITE PLAN,ACCORDING TO THE Ott OF RENTON -- D GI n {.42 arm (LUA-94-157-LLA) BINDING SITE PLAN RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. Signature of • Drc = 1�10' 9206302895,IN VOLUME 161 OF PLATS.PAGES B THROUGH 11 Notary Public r� INCLUSIVE;THENCE NORTH(wane'EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF Dated I -et r10 SAID LOT 7 A DISTANCE OF 18.00 FEET TO THE PONT OF BEGINNING My appointment expires 40' 40' U a CI -+1 I-UTUTY ESMT AND A PONT ON A CURVE,CONCAVE TO ME NORTHEAST.THE CENTER OF DETAIL "A" arc]¢ REC.NO.9206302698 WHICH BEARS NORTH 005{75'EAST 120.0E FEET DISTANT;THENCE N TIES TO RENTON NETWORK CONTROL I A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE PASSING State of Washingten (NOT TO SCALE) LOT 7 -1 70' I EASEMENT FOR WETLAND PROTECTION THROUGH A C NTRAL ANGLE OF 5212'O8'A DISTANCE OF 109.SJ FEET; County of 'Y- THENCE NORTH 3653'1T NEST 173.08 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A I AF NO.EXHIBIT (E10681T•F') CURVE.CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST,HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET; BINDING SITE PLAN FOR I MID E%HIBIT'A'-HC 6N'T UNDER ITHENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL I crtil that I Coon or new satisfactory evidence that W m BURLINGTON NORTHERN W REC.N0.9602081398 ANGLE OF 3614'56'A DISTANCE OF 75.92 FEET TO A POINT ON THE Y CURVE I RADIUS DELTA I LENGTH M BSP NO. 014-92 mo • EAST MARGIN OF UND AVENUE AND A CURVE,CONCAVE TO THE WEST,THE signed this bsrrum d an oath stated N CENTER OF NNICH'BEARS NORTH 795053'NEST B06.74 FEET DISTANT; that he sae authorized to execute the instrument and admorleged that Cl 195R05 0119'30" 45.28' Z I ---I-o THENCE IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC Of SAID CURVE AND Ae was the of the corporation and It was the C2 806.74' 0618' ' 94.69' W I • I MARGIN,PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 045718'A DISTANCE CJ 2050.74' 02'38'34' .69' o free and voluntary act of such prey for the uses and purposes C4 806.74' 01'41'05' 23.72'6507 I I OF 65.07 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE,CONCAVE TO THE NEST• mentioned In the Cot,umenl C5 006.74' 043716' 65.07' a w I N 88I9'S1'W Z HAVING A RADIUS OF 2052.79 FEET;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE ARC a OF SAID CURVE AND MARGIN,PASSING THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE CF CR 120.00' 361{'S6' ]5.92' a'•I 357.02' _-f _ 02'38'34'A DISTANCE OF 94.69 FEET;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID TH 81313951- S9nature of Cl 120.00' 5212'08' e09.33' a et i I EASMART 357.02N FEET TO NE EAST UNE OF STH 0014'29'EAST 109.24 AID LOT�7 STHENCE ALONG Notary Public Z z G -� 75' o '1-EASEMENT NO.9208302702(EINIBID T PROTECTION • ALONG SAID UNE LINE E TH O1'50'09'NESTSOUTH 28'33'S1'PEST FEET; 8.70 FEET;EEUING Holed appointment expires J Z T•, I TO BE MOORED BY CONTINUING ALONG SAID UNE SOUTH 0150'09'WEST 112.00 FEET TO Y 587T)6'45'E RAD I m I SEPERATE DOCUMENT THE PONT OF BEGINNING. ( ) m I Stale of Washington County of ------_ -47 70' I -PROPOSED 70'EASEMENT FOR LOT 3 I I 129,428 va./L I NETUND PROTECTION. COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER Of LOT 7.BURUNGTON I>- to I 2.97 ores I NORTHERN.A BINDING SITE PUN.ACCORDING TO THE CITY CF RENTON p 1 BINDING SITE PLAN RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING N0. APPROVAL fi I 9206302695,IN VOLUME 161 OF PUTS.PAGES 8 THROUGH 11 j I TRAFFIC SGNAL OPERATIONS INCLUSIVE;THENCE NORTH 01'50'09'EAST ALONG THE EAST UNE OF ADMINISTRATOR OF THE PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBUC _ Q / / SAID LOT 7 A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET:THENCE CONTINUING ALONG WORKS DEPARTMENT e MAINTENANCE PEGC. TO / , SAID UNE NORTH 28'33'51'EAST 218.70 FEET;THENCE CONTINUING 3 W 39TH U CITY RENTON REC.Na O 6 ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 0150'09'EAST 181.93 FEET TO THE POINT OF APPROVED THIS-DAY OF 19� ¢ U 9206302701 n• BEGINNING:THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SRO UNE AND BEARING 534.00 _STREET by LOT 3 FEET TO THE NORTH VINE OF SAID LOT 7;THENCE ALONG SAID NORM E%.JO'ACCESS EASEMENT :y LINE NOfiM 87'S0'47'HEST 359.16 FEES TO ME EAST NATION OF UND AdminlstrolOf,Planning,uullding,r Ublic Walks DCparlment �� 3 4, REC.NO.9206302896 k r 0 AVENUE;THENCE ALONG SOLO MARGIN SOUTH HE EAS'NEST 381.48 \ IN ~ FEET;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MARGIN SCUM 0014'29'NEST (signatures of City of Renton officials) r REC.N0.9208302702 / _ (LUA-94-157-LLA) 154.50 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 88T9'51'EAST 357.02 FEET TO THE I w I u �"\ 1\\ $t / / PONT OF BEGINNING. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR / i=c ` \\';'1\ tCjt // APPROVED THIS_DAY OF 19� �`! HORTON DENNIS&ASSOCIATES,INC. I to_m 1 \°e �� . 't'ol I A HUH CONSULTING ENGINEERS o I o „ Director,Development Services Division z ) \ Pt1 320 Second Ave.South WAC 332-130-100 i 36,729 saR. b`�ob (signatures of City of Renton officials) EQUIPMENT USED: TOPCON GTS-3C, 0.84 arse nyh Kirkland WA 98033-6687 \ f425)822-2525 5'THEODOLITE/E.D.M. ' I -'__2 3-E(RAD) \\ c KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS WAC 332-130-090 i2 1-r -i---- I z Examined and approved this_day of 19_ • SURVEY PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE I _ 306.59' \ LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AS PER WAC 332-130-090,PART C. ' �N 89'0525'W I r 18.00' This SHORT PLAT correctly represents a survey King County Assessor Deputy King County Assessor EX.20'RAILROAD R/W E%.24'BLDG SETBACK LINE mode by me or under my direction In conformance PER REC.NO.815040070 with state and county statutes 100 50 0 100 200 300 20'UTUTY ES/FT �imm 111= .REC.NO.9205302695 In T.?. R,.., 1997. RECORDING NO. SCALE IN FEET r'; RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE LEGAL DESCRIPTION •SCALE: 1'-100' - MICHAEL G. MICKIEV6CZ filed for record this. day of 19 at M MERIDIAN:PER BURLINGTON NORTHERN BINDING SITE PUN EXISTING PARCEL: ` ,�► 'et,..,i Certificote No. 17672 In book of at page at the request of LOT 7 OF BURUNGTON NORTHERN.A BINDING STE PLAN. A/. HORTON DENNIS&ASSOC.,INC. NOTE ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF RENTON BINDING SITE PLAN • t• i RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO.2206302696, THE BOUNDARIES.AS SHORN,ARE BASED UPON THE AS PER PUT RECORDED IN VOLUME 161 OF PLATS, ;4 BURUNGTON NORTHERN BINDING SITE PLAN AS RECORDED PAGES 8 THROUGH 11,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; 'P3j�N .,,�a IN VOLUME 161 OF PUTS PAGES a THROUGH 11 ay4L LAWS 3 INCLUSIVE.UNDER RECORDING NO.9206302596,RECORDS SITUATE IN TIE CITY OF RENTON.COUNTY OF KING, Mgr. Supt. of Records OF KING COUNTY.WASHINGTON. STATE OF WASHINGTON. .,... • SHEET 1 of 1 •_ HDA Job No.9747.00 q CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 5, 1998 TO: Gregg Zimmerman FROM: ark R. Pywell SUBJECT: UniFirst Short Plat LUA97-159,SHPL The applicant has requested approval of this short plat, an administrative site plan, and environmental review. The site plan and environmental review are following the normal route through the City's review process and will be presented to the ERC on February 3, 1998. The project site is vacant. Although all three applications were submitted together, they can be reviewed separately because the site plan is not dependent on the approval of the short plat. If the short plat were to be denied, the site plan could still be approved as it would be the only building on the site. We are recommending approval of the short plat. It meets all of the requirements for the Medium Industrial Zone. CONCURRENCE DATE 2A /lr NAME INITIAL/DATE (PrZl�i � ����M II z s \\TS_SERVER\SYS2:\COMMON\-II:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS\97-159.MP\GREGGMMO.DOC\mp I REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: February 3, 1998 Project Name: UniFirst Development Applicant: UniFirst Corporation Owner: Powell-Orilla Associates File Number: LUA-91-159,SA-A,ECF Project Manager: Mark R. Powell, AICP Project Description: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq.ft. to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. The short plat approval will be reviewed under a separate staff report. Project Location: Lind Avenue SW, 500 feet south of SW 34th Street. Exist. Bldg. Area SF: None Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 49,680 sf i Site Area: 4.4 acres Total Building Area SF: . 49,680 sf ■ : i. limo 111 ,,, .5 IMOII Iift. .. ' -I _i:m othitti ,) J11111 q J- 1., Rh. ...9... r� l o0 IM 8... jQ 1 V6- 0 , Ad , a mom • i „1 ,, AIIIIII Project Location Map , sITERC.Doc • City of Renton P/B/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&, •onmental Review Committee Staff Report UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT L UA-97-159,SA A,ECF I REPORT AND DECISION OFFEBRUARY3,1998 Page 2 of 11 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant has a vacant 4.4 parcel of land. The applicant has submitted two applications. One, a short plat application, will subdivide the existing lot into three lots. The site plan application will allow for the construction of a 49,680 square foot building that is proposed for use as a commercial laundry. The environmental review is attached to the site plan application. When the adjacent property was developed, a wetland analysis and report were prepared by David Evans &Associates. This work identified a wetland on the adjacent property and indicated that there was some evidence that the wetland continued onto the property that is the subject of this development proposal. Approximately two years ago some fill was place on this site without the required permits. The owner was notified and the fill was removed. When the current project was first proposed the applicant had a wetlands analysis prepared by B12 &Associates. This report stated that there were no wetlands on this project site. City staff had both wetland reports reviewed by the Department of Ecology to determine if any further analysis was required. DOE reported back that what appeared to have happened here was that an isolated wetland may have started on this site but that the site did not have the hydrology to support a wetland. Therefore, the second report was correct in that at this time there was no wetland on the subject property and that DOE would not recommend that any mitigation be required. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: The applicant has submitted a geotechnical report prepared by Terra Associates, Inc. and dated August 15, 1997. The report states that the project site consist of 4.5 to 7 feet of loose fill over the native material that includes a clayey silt layer. Ground water was observed at depths ranging from 2.5 to 6.5 feet. The report indicates that the site should be surcharged to compress the building pad area and limit post construction settling. The applicant will need to comply with the recommendations contained within the geotechnical report. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is required. Policy Nexus: N/A SITERC.DOC • City,of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&E nmental Review Committee Staff Report UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT L UA-97-159,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFFEBRUARY 3,1998 Page 3 of 11 (2) Air Impacts: Adverse air impacts during the construction phase of this project could include fugitive dust and exhaust from construction vehicles. Dust will be mitigated by the Code- required temporary erosion control measures, that include sprinkling the site as required. Exhaust from construction equipment and vehicles is already controlled by state and federal regulation and no site specific mitigation is necessary. During the operation phase of the project, adverse air impacts could be associated with the heating source for the building and the vehicles associated with the use of the building. These potential sources of air pollution are controlled by state and federal regulations and no further site specific mitigation measures are required. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: N/A (3) Water Impacts: The project will be creating a parking lot and a vehicle circulation system of approximately 4,600 sf. Due to the size of the paved area, the applicant needs to comply with the surface water requirements of the City. Surface water quality has been addressed for this project by the on-site water quality system that includes two wetponds and two bioswale areas. After the storm water has been treated it will enter into the City system for this area. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is required. Policy Nexus: N/A (4) Police and Fire Departments Impacts: Police Department staff indicate that they have sufficient resources to provide service to the proposed project. Fire Prevention Bureau staff have indicate that service can be provided to this site provided that the Code-required improvements are installed. The City has adopted a Fire Mitigation Fee to mitigate the impact of development on City Fire Department service. The applicant will need to submit a fee of$0.52 per square foot of new building (49,650 sf X$0.52 = $25,818.00). Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.52 per square foot of new building (estimate 49,650 sf x 0.52 = $25,818.00) prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) SITERC.DOC • City.of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&E ;nmental Review Committee Staff Report UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-I59,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFFEBRUARY 3,1998 Page 4 of 11 (5) Transportation Impacts: It is estimated that the proposed project will generate 133 trips per day. The additional vehicle trips will have an adverse impact on the City's circulation system unless steps are taken to mitigate these impacts. The City has adopted a Transportation Mitigation Fee to provide the funding for the system wide improvements that are required within the City's circulation system. The applicant will need to submit a mitigation fee of$75 per average daily trip. The applicant will still be required to provide the Code-required improvements along their street frontage. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per average daily trip (estimate $75 x 133 daily trips = $9,975.00) prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) I - B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment and Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment and Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Appeal Period. Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.52 per square foot of new building (estimate 49,650 sf x 0.52 = $25,818.00) prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall submit a Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per average daily trip (estimate $75 x 133 daily trips = $9,975.00) prior to the issuance of building permits. SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E ,inmental Review Committee Staff Report UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT L UA-97-I59,SA A,ECF ' • REPORT AND DECISION OFFEBRUARY 3,1998 Page 5 ofll Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary required fire flow is 4000 GPM. This requires a looped fire main and four fire hydrants. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and three additionally hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by City Ordinance. 2. A sprinkler system and fire alarm system are required. Separate plan and permits are required for these systems. 3. Provide a list of any flammable or combustible liquids and chemicals to be used or stored in the building. Transportation 1. A six foot sidewalk is required at the right-of-way line on Lind Ave. SW for the full length of the•project. Sewer 1. The System Development Connection charge is$14,953.06. 2. A sewer backflow prevention device is required if the floor elevation is 22-feet. Floor elevation indicated at 21- feet on conceptual plan. 3. If project produces fats, oils, or grease than an appropriate removal system is required. 4. Plans show vertical profile and standard details. 5. The available sewer line will flow through a lift station. Therefore, this will require a capacity analysis of the lift station by an approved consultant. If the analysis shows the system needs increased capacity, it is the developers responsibility to provide the funds for the improvements. Surface Water 1. The System Development Connection charge is$14,838.09. 2. Use NAVD 1988 Datum for the project. The datum is to be shown on each sheet with the elevations. 3. Erosion Control plan is required. 4. The following comments are from a memo to Clint Morgan from Ron Straka, dated January 13, 1998, regarding the water quality system. The report needs to show that the bottom of the detention live storage is above the 2-year flow elevation in the outlet pipe from the pond structure. It appears this was the intended objective of Section V of the report, Off-Site Analysis. However, since the flows used in Section VII were'uncontrolled release rates, the calculated tailwater elevations at the ponds were higher than the elevation of the bottom of the detention ponds. Section VII of the report, Off-Site Analysis, really analyzes the on-site system to determine the tailwater at the control structure for the detention facility design. I suggest renaming or including this analysis in Section IVC. The report needs to include the calculations for the time of concentration, Tc. The Tc used for the undeveloped condition appears to small. Each biofiltration swale must be 200 feet long or widened to compensate for the shortened length. The biofiltration swales must also be above the 2-year storm event water level in the detention pond. An alternative to the use of biofiltration swales may be to construct a combined wetpond/detention facility. The wetpond volume and surface area would need to be sized in accordance with Special Requirement#5 of the KCSWDM, but may help with the grade problem the site is trying to work around. SITERC.DOC City.of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&B Pnmental Review Committee Staff Report UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-I59,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFFEBRUARY 3,1998 Page 6 of 11 Notes Continued The report needs to show that adequate pond volumes are being provided. The volume provided must exceed that calculated for the 10-year event by a factor of 1.3 or detention must be provided to the 100-year event, which is what the project is doing. The report must document that detention is provided to the 100-year event instead of applying the 1.3 factor. Plans The schematic plan provided with the report did not show any storm system within the proposed parking lot. Instead the design appears to rely on sheet flow to convey runoff to the biofiltration swales. This should be clearly noted in the drainage report. However, all on-site runoff needs to be input at the head of the water quality facility so the runoff receives full treatment. If an on-site system will be provided, then the report is to include a schematic of the system and a backwater analysis of the system upstream of the pond to show that on-site pipe sizes are adequate. The plans need to show all downspouts tightlines. Roof drainage may bypass the water quality facility, but must not bypass the detention facility. By passing the roof drainage around the biofiltration swale would reduce the size of the swale. Any question regarding the memo may be directed to Scott Woodbury (425) 277-5548. Water Utility 1. A 15-foot utility easement is required for the water loop system. 2. The proposed 8-inch water line is not large enough to meet the 4,000 gpm required fire flow. 3. Four(4) fire hydrants are required. 4. The System Development Connection charge is$21,662.77. Police Department 25.67 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE 1. Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. 2. It is recommended that the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing"signs on the property while it's under construction. This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED BUILDING 1. It's important to direct any and all foot traffic into the main front entrance that should be monitored during all hours of business. This will provide the building the control it will need to keep track of the comings and goings of all visitors. Any other exterior doors should be by coded access only to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property. All doors should be made of a solid core wood or metal with auxiliary locking devices with latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks. All doors should have peepholes installed to assist in easy identification of anyone outside the facility. SITERC.DOC • • • • CityofRenton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&1- mmental Review Committee Staff Report UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT - LUA-97-159,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFFEBRUARY 3,1998 Page 7 of 11 2. Proper security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the walkways, and in the rear and side of the building as well. All areas for loading and unloading need to be properly lit for the safety of customers and employees. 3. It is recommended that the building have a monitored security alarm installed, with all doors leading to the outside having the words"Alarmed Door" in red lettering, at least 6" in height placed on the outside of each door to deter any criminals from breaking in at these points of entry. 4. Landscaping around the exterior of the building should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the building the look of a fortress and possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into the facility, especially during the hours of darkness. Community Services Department 1. All landscaping outside of the property line and within the street right-of-way to be maintained by property owner. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Site Plan (Received October 21, 1997). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Building Floor Plan (Received October 21, 1997). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, Building Elevation (Received October21, 1997). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 4, Landscape Plan (Received October 21, 1997). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. 5, Preliminary Grading (Received October 21, 1997). Exhibit No. 7: Drawing No. 6, Neighborhood Detail Map (Received October 21, 1997). SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&f mmental Review Committee Staff Report UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-159,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFFEBRUARY 3,1998 Page 8 of 11 C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: 1. GENERAL CRITERIA: a. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The project site is designated as Employment Area-Valley on the Land Use Element Map of the Comprehensive Plan. The objective is to provide for a mix of employment-based uses, including commercial, office and industrial development to support the economic development of the City of Renton. The proposed commercial laundry is consistent Comprehensive Plan designation for this area. Policy LU-212.2: Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. The plans submitted demonstrate a building with a commercial laundry area and office area. This is a similar style of building that has developed in the adjacent area. b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject property is designated as Medium Industrial (IM) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. Commercial laundries are a permitted use within the IM zone. The IM zone requires a 15'setback from streets and a 20' setback from arterial streets. The applicant is proposing to provide a 26' landscaped setback from the street frontage. A sidewalk will connect the entrance to the building with the sidewalk along Lind Avenue. Although no side or rear yard setbacks are required in this zone, the applicant will be providing setbacks in excess of 30 feet along both sides and the rear of the property in order to provide locations for storm water quality features and landscaping. c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The applicant will be mitigating the impacts of this development on the surrounding properties by providing landscape setbacks along the front, rear, and side yards of the proposed building. The applicant will be landscaping these areas. In addition, the applicant is providing storm water quality features that, when sized correctly, will remove any pollutants collected from the parking lots and driving, area from the storm water prior to releasing the water into the existing storm water system for this area. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The is an existing created wetland along the rear of this property. This wetland was created as mitigation for the filling of wetlands on adjacent sites. The applicant has respected the easement that was recorded as part of the creation of the wetland. The applicant has provided for a natural habitat area, as required by Code, along this easement but on his own property. This will extend the buffer between the on-site activities that are part of the commercial laundry and the natural wetland area. The notes from Surface Water Utility indicate that the water quality features may not be sized correctly for this site. These are Code-requirements that the applicant will need to comply with during the building/construction permit phase of development. The changes should not require the applicant to make significant changes to the proposed site plan. However, if changes to the site plan are required, the applicant will need to submit them to the Development Service Division for review. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The development of the vacant property will help to maintain the area-wide property values. SITERC.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&I ?mental Review Committee Staff Report UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-I59,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFFEBRUARY 3,1998 Page 9 of 11 f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The applicant has provided a pedestrian only connection between the main entrance into the building and the sidewalk along Lind Avenue SW. There is a second sidewalk that connects the side of the building with the sidewalk along Lind Ave. that can be used by employees entering into the building. Vehicle circulation has been provided through one entrance directly onto Lind Avenue and a second entrance onto the existing private roadway on the north side of the property that connects with Lind Avenue. There is a 20-foot wide roadway behind the building that is a fire access roadway. This roadway will need to be kept clear at all times. City staff noted that there appears to be loading doors located at the rear of the building. The applicant has indicated that these doors will only be used when it is necessary to service or replace equipment (boilers etc.) that will be located in the rear of the building and that they will not be used as a loading entrance. The loading doors that will be used on a daily basis are located on the sides of the building. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The applicant is providing a minimum of 26' between the building and a property line. This will provide sufficient room for natural light to reach all sides of the building and allow for air circulation around the building. h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; All work related activities will occur within the building. This will help to dampen any noise that is created by the machinery. No noise or odor impacts are anticipated to be created by this building. It should be noted that this will be the second commercial laundry to operate in the Valley area. The existing commercial laundry has not generated any complaints regarding noise or odors in the valley. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Adequate public services are available to serve the proposed development providing that all Code-required improvements are installed. j. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The development and maintenance of this facility will prevent neighborhood deterioration and blight. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. Findings, Conclusions& Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for the construction of a commercial laundry facility. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. SITERC.DOC • City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&1 mmental Review Committee Staff Report UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-159,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFFEBRUARY 3,1998 Page 10 of 11 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 7. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Valley. 5) Zoning: The Conditional Use as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Medium Industrial (IM) Zoning designation. 5) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Office Commercial and Industrial; East: Office Commercial and Industrial; South: Office Commercial and Industrial and West: Office Commercial and Industrial. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Industrial; and the Zoning designation of Medium Industrial (IM). F. Decision The Site Plan for UniFirst Development, File No. LUA-98-159,SA-A,ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan demonstrating how the appropriate storm water system will be arranged within the area provided prior to the issuance of building permits. • EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: cP,J James C.Hanson,Zoning Administrator date ' SITERC.DOC I . City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&1, onmental Review Committee Staff Report UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-159,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFFEBRUARY 3,1998 Page 11 of 11 TRANSMITTED this 6th day of February, 1998 to the applicant and owner: Power-Orilla Associates 737 Market Street Kirkland, WA 98033 Gary A. Bigelow UniFirst Corporation 1454 Kittrell Road Franklin, TN 37064 Barton G. Treece, Jr P.E. Treece&Company 320 Second Avenue S. #200 Kirkland, WA 98033 TRANSMITTED this 6th day of February, 1998 to the parties of record: None Listed TRANSMITTED 6th day of February, 1998 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official Art Larson,Fire Prevention Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 23, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 23, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. SITERC.DOC CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 5, 1998 TO: Mark Pywell rC8 G FROM: Sonja J.Fesser •sN _ fitop " /998 kV SUBJECT: Powell Short Plat,LUA-97-159-SHPL c/ry0 INN/NG Addressing Information In the memo sent to you, dated January 29, 1998, concerning the above referenced short plat, it was noted that the pertinent addressing information would be sent to you when available. Please forward the following addressing information to the applicant: Lot 1 -3850 Lind Avenue SW Lot 2-3800 Lind Avenue SW Lot 3 -3600 Lind Avenue SW Also, the drawing should note that the street name is Lind Avenue SW. The SW is currently not noted. \\TS SERVER\SYS2:\COMMON\-H:\FILE.SYS\LND120\0220\RE980204.DOC\sf • CIT OF RENTON .'..LL 'V`„, Planning/Building/Public Works Department - Jesse Tanner;Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 4, 1998 Washington State Department of Ecology - Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on February 3, 1998: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq.ft.to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. The short plat approval will be reviewed under a separate staff report. Location: Lind Avenue SW, 500 feet south of SW 34th Street. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 23, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments,'if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with:: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 23,"1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. . If you have questions, please call me at(425)277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, Mark R. P I,AICP • • • Project Manager cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries. David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources • Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office • Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) " Joe Jainga,Puget Sound Energy;' • AGNCYLTRDOCI • • • 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 • at This naner r nntains 50%recycled material.20%oust consumer c: • CIT71 'OF RENTON ..+i � Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner;Mayor''''' Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 4, 1998. • • Mr. Barton Treece, Jr., P.E. • Treece &Company • - 320 Second Avenue South,#200 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: UniFirst Development . Project No. LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF Dear Mr: Treece: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project: The ERC, on February 4, 1998,'.issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Comments regarding the environmental determination mustbe,fled in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 23, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the.enviironmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,'error:iin judgment,;or'the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments:After review of the-comments, if the _ ,.. Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend'its original determination, then there will:be no further extension of the appeal period.:;Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal : appeal within the original 15-day timeframe:`.Written comments must tie,filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. • Appeals of either the environmental determination[RCW43.21:C075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM"February 23, 1998, If no,appeals are'filed by this date, both'actions will become final: Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. 'Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification-of the above, please call me at(425) 277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, Mark R. P I,AICP . Project . Hager : . . cc: : :;;. UniFirst Corporation/Applicant • . I. • Powell-Orilla Associates/Owners Enclosure :: DNSMLTR.DOC :200 Mill-Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF-NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES & CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): _LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF APPLICANT: UniFirst Corporation PROJECT NAME: UniFirst Development . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq.ft. to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will.be used for a commercial laundry. The short plat approval will be reviewed under a separate staff report. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue SW, 500 feet South of SW 34th Street ;: MITIGATION MEASURES: • 1. The applicant shall submit;a Fire Mitigation,Fee_of$0.52 per square foot of new building (estimate 49,650 sf x 0.52= $25,818 00) priorto;the issuance of building permits. • 2. ; The applicant shall submit a Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per average daily trip (estimate$75 x 133 daily trips= $9,975.00) prior,to the issuance of building permits. , The Site Plan for UniFirst Development, File No'.;LUA-98-159,SA-A,ECF, is approved ' subject to the following conditions. • CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan demonstrating how the appropriate storm water system will be arranged within the area provided prior to the issuance of building permits. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF APPLICANT: UniFirst Corporation PROJECT NAME: UniFirst Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq.ft. to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. The short plat approval will be reviewed under a separate staff report. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue SW, 500 feet South of SW 34th Street • • Advisory Notes to Applicant:.. ' The following notes are supplemental information provided in`conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal;process for environmental determinations. 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be-easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary required fire flow is 4000_GPM. This requires a looped fire main and four fire hydrants. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and three additionally hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by City Ordinance. 2. A sprinkler system and fire alarm systemaare required.;Separate plan and permits are required for these systems. 3. Provide a list of any flammable or combustible liquids and chemicals to be used or stored in the building. Transportation 1. A six foot sidewalk is required at the right-of-way line on Lind Ave. SW for the full length of the project. Sewer 1. . The System Development Connection charge is$14,953.06. 2. A sewer backflow prevention device is required if the floor elevation is 22-feet. Floor elevation indicated at 21-feet on conceptual plan. 3. If project produces fats, oils, or grease than an appropriate removal system is required. 4. Plans show vertical profile and standard details. � r • UniFirst Development LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF Advisory Notes (Continued) 5. The available sewer line will flow through a lift station. Therefore,this will require a capacity analysis of the lift station by an approved consultant. If the analysis shows the system needs increased capacity, it is the developers responsibility to provide the funds for the improvements. Surface Water . 1. The System Development Connection charge is$14,838.09. 2. Use NAVD 1988 Datum for the project. The datum is to be shown on each sheet with the elevations. 3. Erosion Control plan is required. 4. The following comments are from a memo to Clint Morgan from Ron Straka, dated January 13, 1998, regarding the water quality system. . The report needs to show that the bottom of the detention live storage is above the 2-year flow elevation in the outlet pipe from the pond structure.. It appears this was the intended objective of Section V of the report, Off-Site Analysis. However, since the flows used in Section VII were uncontrolled release rates, the calculated tailwater elevations at the ponds were higher than the elevation of the bottom of the detention ponds. Section VII of the report, Off-Site Analysis, really analyzes the on-site system to determine the tailwater • at the control structure for the detention facility design. I suggest renaming or including this analysis in Section IVC. • The report needs to include the calculations for the.time of concentration, Tc. The Tc used for the undeveloped condition appears to small. - Each biofiltration swale must be 200 feet long or widened to compensate for the shortened length. The biofiltration swales must also'be above the 2-year.storm event water level in the detention pond. An alternative to the use of biofiltration swales:may`be"toeconstruct a combined wetpond/detention facility. The wetpond volume and surface area would need,to be sized in accordance with Special Requirement #5 of the KCSWDM, but may help with the grade problem'the site is trying to work around. The report needs to show that adequate pond volumes are being provided.,!The volume provided must exceed that calculated for the 10-year event by a factor of:f.3 or detention must be provided to the 100 yearevent,which is what the project is doing. The report must document that detention is provided to the 100-year event instead of applying the 1.3,factor. Plans The schematic plan provided with the report did not show any storm system within the proposed parking lot. Instead the design appears to rely on sheet flow to convey runoff to the biofiltration swales. This should be clearly noted in the drainage report. However, all on-site runoff needs to be input at the head of the water quality facility so the runoff receives full treatment. If an on-site system will be provided, then the report is to include a schematic of the system and a backwater analysis of the system upstream of the pond to show that on-site pipe sizes are adequate. . The plans need to show all downspouts tightlines. Roof drainage may bypass the water quality facility, but must not bypass the detention facility. By passing the roof drainage around the biofiltration swale would reduce the size of the swale. Any question regarding the memo may be directed to Scott Woodbury (425)277-5548. Water Utility 1. . A 15-foot utility easement is required for the water loop system. 2. The proposed 8-inch water line is not large enough to meet the 4,000 gpm required fire flow. 3. :Four(4)fire hydrants are required. • 4. The System Development Connection charge is$21,662.77. „t` UniFirst Development LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF Advisory Notes(Continued) Police Department -- I 25.67 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually I • CONSTRUCTION PHASE 1. Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers - should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2”throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. 2. It is recommended that the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing"signs on the property while it's under construction. This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED BUILDING 1. _ It's important to'direct any and all foot traffic into the main'front entrance that should be monitored during all hours of business.This will provide the building the control it will need to keep track of the comings and goings of all visitors. Any other exterior doors should be by coded access only to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property. All doors should be made of a solid core wood or metal with auxiliary locking devices with latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks. All doors should have peepholes installed to assist in easy identification of anyone outside the facility.` 2. Proper security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the walkways, and in the rear and side of the building as well. All areas'for loading and unloading need to be properly lit for the safety of customers and employees. 3. It is recommended that the building have a monitored security alarm installed,with all doors leading to the outside having the words"Alarmed Door"in red lettering,at least 6"in height placed on the outside of each door to deter any criminals from breaking in at these points of entry. 4. Landscaping around the exterior of the building should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the building the look of a fortress and possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into the facility, especially during the hours of darkness. Community Services Department 1. All landscaping outside of the property line and within the street right-of-way to be maintained by property owner. 1 I - b CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-159,SA-A,ECF, Slvpi..-A APPLICANT: UniFirst Corporation PROJECT NAME: UniFirst Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq.ft. to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. The short plat approval will be reviewed under a separate staff report. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue SW, 500 feet South of SW 34th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 23, 1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 23, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. PUBLICATION DATE: February 09, 1998 , DATE OF DECISION: February 03, 1998 SIGNATURES: 1--/3/ s G94 ?%IIeet A DATE Departme o lanning/Building/Public Works I 4,, ,z_k 9,_ 3 a im Shepherd DATE/ acilities Department �� 2---sCI-44.-' /dim ililqY L � eeler, Fire Chi e DATE Renton Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES & CONDITIONS APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF APPLICANT: UniFirst Corporation PROJECT NAME: UniFirst Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq.ft.to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. The short plat approval will be reviewed under a separate staff report. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue SW, 500 feet South of SW 34th Street • • MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall submit.a Fire Mitigation Fee of.$0.52 per square foot of new building _ (estimate 49,650 sf x 0.52=:$25,818.00) prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. The applicant shall submit a Transportation;Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per average daily trip (estimate $75 x 133 daily trips= $9,975.00 "nor to the issuance of building permits. The Site Plan for UniFirst Development, File No. LUA-98-159,SA-A,ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions." CONDITIONS: • 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plandemonstrating how the appropriate storm water system will be arranged within the area provided prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF APPLICANT: UniFirst Corporation PROJECT NAME: UniFirst Development DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq.ft. to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. The short plat approval will be reviewed under a separate staff report. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Lind Avenue SW, 500 feet South of SW 34th Street • Advisory Notes to Applicant ?. The following notes are supplemental information'provided7n_conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary required fire flow is 4000 GPM. This requires a looped fire main and four fire hydrants. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and three additionally hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by City Ordinance. 2. A sprinkler system and fire alarm system are required._:-Separate plan and permits are required for these systems. 3. Provide a list of any flammable or combustible liquids and chemicals to be used or stored in the - building. Transportation 1. ' A six foot sidewalk is required at the right-of-way line on Lind Ave.SW for the full length of the project. Sewer 1. The System Development Connection charge is$14,953.06. 2. A sewer backflow prevention device is required if the floor elevation is 22-feet. Floor elevation indicated at 21-feet on conceptual plan. 3. If project produces fats, oils, or grease than an appropriate removal system is required. 4. Plans show vertical profile and standard details. . : • • UniFirst Development LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF. Advisory Notes(Continued) 5. The available sewer line will flow through a lift station. Therefore,this will.require a capacity analysis of the lift station by an approved consultant. If the analysis shows the system needs increased capacity, it is the developers responsibility to provide the funds for the improvements. Surface Water 1. The System Development Connection charge is$14,838.09. 2. Use NAVD 1988.Datum for the project. The datum is to be shown on each sheet with the elevations. 3. .Erosion Control plan is required. • 4. The following comments are from a memo to Clint Morgan from Ron Straka, dated January 13, 1998, regarding the water quality system. The report needs to show that the bottom of the detention live storage is above the 2-year flow elevation in the outlet pipe from the pond structure. It appears this was the intended objective of Section V of the report, Off-Site Analysis., However, since the flows used in Section VII were uncontrolled release rates, the calculated tailwater elevations at the ponds were higher than the elevation of the bottom of the detention ponds. Section,VII of the report, Off-Site Analysis, really analyzes the on-site system to determine the tailwater at the control structure for the detention facility design:' I suggest renaming or including this analysis in Section IVC. The report needs to include the calculations for the time of concentration, Tc. The Tc used for the undeveloped condition appears to small,. r - .. .' Each biofiltration swale must be 200 feet long or widened to compensate for the shortened length. The biofiltration swales must also'be above the 2-year storm"event water level in the detention pond. An alternative to the use of biofiltration swales may to;construct a combined wetpond/detention facility. The wetpond volume and surface area would need to be,sized in accordance with Special Requirement #5 of the KCSWDM, but may help with the grade:problem the site is trying to workaround. The report needs to show that adequate pond_ volumes are being provided: The volume provided must exceed that calculated for the 10-year event by a factor of 1.3 or detention must be provided to the 100- year event,which is what the project is doing. The report must document detention is provided to the 100-year event instead of applying'the1.3 factor. Plans The schematic plan provided with the report did not show any storm system within the proposed parking lot. Instead the design appears to rely on sheet flow to convey runoff to the.biofiltration swales. This should be clearly noted in the drainage report. However, all on-site runoff needs to be input at the head of the water quality facility so the runoff receives full treatment.' If an on-site system will be provided, then the report is to include a schematic.of the system and a backwater analysis of the system upstream of the pond to show that on-site pipe sizes are adequate. The plans need to show all downspouts tightlines. Roof drainage may bypass the water quality facility, but must not bypass the detention facility: By passing the roof drainage around the biofiltration swale • would reduce the size of the swale. Any question regarding the memo may be directed to Scott Woodbury(425)277-5548. Water Utility 1. A 15-foot utility easement is required for the water loop system. 2. The proposed 8-inch.water line is not large enough to meet the 4,000 gpm required fire flow. 3. Four(4)fire hydrants arerequiired. 4.. The System Development Connection charge is.$21,662.77. : •' : . . • • UniFirst Development LUA-97-15 9,SA-A,S H P L-A,E C F Advisory Notes(Continued) Police Department-- 25.67 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE 1. Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked whennot in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2"throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. 2. It is recommended that the business post the appropriate "No Trespassing"signs on the property while it's under construction. This will aid police in making arrests on the a property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED BUILDING 1. It's important to direct any and all foot traffic into the main front entrance that should be monitored during all hours of business: This will provide the building the control it will need to keep track of the comings and goings of all visitors. Any other exterior doors should be by coded access only to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on`the property. All doors should be made of a solid core wood or metal with auxiliary locking devices with latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks. All doors should have peepholes installed to assist in easy identification of anyone outside the facility. • 2. Proper security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the walkways, and in the rear and side of the building as well. All areas for loading and unloading need to be properly lit for the safety of customers and employees. 3. It is recommended that the building have a monitored security alarm installed,with all doors leading to the outside having the words"Alarmed Door" in red lettering, at least 6" in height placed on the outside of each door to deter any criminals from breaking in at these points of entry. 4. Landscaping around the exterior of the building should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the building the look of a fortress and possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into the facility, especially during the hours of darkness. Community Services Department 1. All landscaping outside of the property line and within the street right-of-way to be maintained by property owner. . • . .., . • . NoTIGE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT I PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel Into throe lots ranging In size from 38,729 sq.m.to 192,501 on the Northern ost : The proposed be pproximately 25 feet tall.49 willIl be used fa0 sq.ft. riagcommercial laundry.The short plat approval will ibie reng viewed under a separate staff report.Location:Lind Avenue SW,500 feel south of SW 34th Street. • . THE OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HS DETERMINED THAT TI E TY PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. • Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 23,1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure.errors of law or fact,error in Judgment,or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the lime of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments,it the . Environmental Review Committee finds there Is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formai appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Hader,Land Use Review Supl Avenue uth,Renton,WA eithhervisor,er the environmental deteermin of Renton ation IRCW 3.21..0075(3),WACment Services Division,200 I197.11-68 Joand/or the land usee055.decision ppeals of must be , filed in writing on or before'5:00 PM February 23,1998. If no appeals are filed by this dale,bath actions will become Anal.Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501. • ■1---L'it Is! •►;oj -_ Ulf: =1 - R.1„„ ,.11 itom° hi. r ..,._ . .. UMI Alra'(' 1 7 lam: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)277-5586. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION IPlease Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file'identtfication.:"•`': CERTIFICATION I, Kgitut (?, '1a-' , hereby certify that -3 copies of the above document were posted by me in - conspicuous places on or nearby the described property onj , L- • Signed :c1/41 ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Norte Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in`� , on the Q-t day of � �. /1S) . -‘'..:77-71H GC.-A f . MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 7,40 • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq.ft.to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. The short plat approval will be reviewed under a separate staff report. Location: Lind Avenue SW,500 feet south of SW 34th Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 23,1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments,if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period: Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe.. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination.[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM February 23, 1998. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may.be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-235-2501. ii. �i II. 1 J I ; 1 - r dIMPJIiu P rat 6= ! ��rJ r e4111 mu MIMI \� A In FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT • SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)277-5586. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION E <w a ;.calls fn:: ro .011 3de >Ei#00.o"`><':<> >::`><ig::: ;:::>:«:::::> ::::,;:::Please3nclude.the:: r..o ectNUMB. R..:..,h..:n.:......: .n r:.:.:.. ::.:::::wL1...::::.:..:..::n..:..:......:.:..n..,::::.:.:,:,.:.::.::.:.:..:.. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the - NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL DETERMINATION I ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE , 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 RENTON;WASHINGTON The Environmental'Review Committee (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal Significance - Mitigated for the following.` newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months a project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language --- --1 .., continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County j UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the " Environmental review for approval to sub- State of Washington for King County. : divide existing parcel.The proposed build- ingThe notice in the exact form attached,waspublished in the South County9 Location:will Lindus Ave.das aSW, 500 commercialtlaundry. . A 500 feet south of ' Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers SW 34th St. • during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will Unifirst Development j end at 5:00 PM on February 23, 1998. Written comments shall be forwarded,to I the Development Services Division Land as published on: 2/9/98 . I Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures ' imposed by the City of Renton's I The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$48.08 1 Environmental Review Committee are Legal Number 4202 I available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, 9 Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235- / , 2550. Appeal procedures are available in /lJ'i five J the City Clerk's office, First floor,Municipal C��� `� Building. L al Clerk, South ounty Jo rnal Published in the South County Journal I ' February 9, 1998.4202 Subscribed and sworn before me on this Clay of ‘.74sd1 , 19 '12 ‘011111 moo. 679 0 N M• V •`��•l-''ii®Fa6°,�y! '% Notary Public of the State of Washington z.@it... : ��' itE_•,.. residing in Renton �OTAR} :•�,: King County, Washington — —0— • - ',/i//,®P tf j 1AS�`````�� NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT L U A-97-159,SA-A,S H P L-A,E C F Environmental review for approval to subdivide existing parcel. The proposed building will be used as a commercial laundry. Location: Lind Ave. SW, 500 feet south of SW 34th St. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on February 23, 1998. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. Publication Date: February 9, 1998 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot •• = ` Cr' _ OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator February 2, 1998 Mr. Barton G.Treece Jr., P.E. Treece &Company 320 Second Avenue South,#200 Kirkland, WA 98033 • • Subject: Unifirst Short Plat LUA97-159,SHPL Dear Mr. Treece: Enclosed are the comments we have received from Property Services. These changes are not required on the preliminary short plat now under review, but will be necessary on the short plat that is submitted for recording. If you have any questions regarding this procedure, please contact me at 277-5586. • Sincerely, • Mark R. Pp'": , AICP Project M-nager • • • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CyC7 Thie nanar rnntainc cO%rarvrlarl material 70%nnst consumer • Washington State Northwest Region •, Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DATE: January 16, 1998 CITY OF RENTON JAN 2 6 1998 TO: City of Renton, Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South RECEIVE® • Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 167 MP 24.77 CS 1716 • Notice of Application-Unifirst Development-3 lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq. ft. to 192,561, sq. ft. and construct a 49,680 sq. ft. bldg. for a commercial laundry 1v41(-4-/ ) File No.LUA-97-159,SA,A,SHPL-A,ECF FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning &Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North;MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project,which is located on the east side of Lind Avenue, north of SW 39th Street. Our response is below: We have reviewed this subject document and have no comments. -he project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. • If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at,440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name I!jlT■ TREECE & COMPANY ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 320 2nd Ave South, Suite 200, Kirkland,Washington 98033 Phone (206)822-2577 Fax(206) 822-8758 RECEIVED December 22, 1997 DEC 2 4 is DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF ReNTON Mark R. Pywell Senior Planner City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: POWELL SHORT PLAT AND UNIFIRST CORPORATION Dear Mark: In response to your request of Thursday, please accept this letter as our agreement that the owner/development team will hold the City of Renton harmless should any future wetland issues that may impact these two applications arise. This agreement is in recognition of B-Twelve and • Department of Ecology's review of wetland issues on the above captioned sites. Mark, I trust this will allow the continuation of review of these two applications. We look forward to hearing from you soon. Best regards, TREECE& COMPANY, INC. /1,4 :/47-7 ( Barton G. Treece, Jr., P.E. President B GT:vg:pywe11.d22 cc:. Peter Powell,Powell Development Gary.A.Bigelow,Unifirst Corp. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: a,•.Cdc.<< eu. COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 06, 1998 APPLICANT: UniFirst Corporation/Gary Bigelow PROJECT MANAGER: MARK R. PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT WORK ORDER NO: 78299 • LOCATION: East side of Lind Avenue, North of SW 39th Street CIS.^''Fl,of SITE AREA: 4.4 acres I BUILDING A3 N�E�(gross): 4�J.650 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into'n4h3teeptal ranging in size from 36,729 sq.ft. to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Norther t lot. The propo =d building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. �GJtty� ®veyl® AI A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts . Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics . Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities �r Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment • 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Represent ve ate DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 Unifirst Corp.Development Lind Ave. Betw. SW 34th&SW 41st St. EIS Development Services January 20, 1997 SEWER: 1. The System Development Connection charge is$14,953.06. 2. A sewer backflow prevention devise is required if the floor elevation is below 22-feet. Floor elevation indicated at 21-feet on conceptual plan. 3. If the project produce fats, oils, or grease then an appropriate removal system will be required. 4. Plans to show vertical profile and standard details. 5. The available sewer line will flow through a life station. Therefore, this will require a capacity analysis of the lift station capacity by an approve Consultant. If the analysis shows the system needs increase capacity it is the developer responsibility to provide the cost. STORM SURFACE WATER: DRAINAGE REPORT 1. The System Development Connection charge is $14,838.09. 2. Use NAVD 1988 Datum for project. The datum is to be shown on each sheet with elevations. Provide datum and benchmark. 3. Erosion control plan required. 4. The following comments are from memo to Clinton Morgan from Ron Straka, dated January 13, 1998. The report needs to show that the bottom of the detention live storage is above the 2-year flow elevation in the outlet pipe from the pond control structure. It appears this was the intended objective of Section V of the report, Off-Site Analysis. However, since the flows used in Section VII were uncontrolled release rates, the calculated tailwater elevations at the ponds were higher than the elevation of the bottom of the detention ponds. Section VII of the report, Off-Site Analysis,really analyzes the on-site system to determine the tailwater at the control structure for the detention facility design. I suggest renaming or including this analysis in Section IVC. The report needs to include the calculations for the time of concentration, Tc. The Tc used for the undeveloped condition appears to be too small. 98CM005D.DOC\ w Each biofiltration swale must be 200 feet long or widened to compensate for the shortened length. The biofiltration swales must also be above the 2-year storm event water level in the detention pond. An alternative to the use of biofiltration swales may be to construct a combined wetpond/detention facility. The wetpond volume and surface area would need to be sized in accordance with Special Requirement #5 of the KCSWDM,but may help with the grade problems the site is trying to work around. The report needs to show that adequate pond volumes are being provided. The volume provided must exceed that calculated for the 10-year event by a factor of 1.3 or detention must be provided to the 100- year event, which is what the project is doing. The report must document that detention is provided to the 100-year event instead of applying the 1.3 factor. PLANS The schematic plan provided with the report did not show any storm system within the proposed parking lot. Instead the design appears to rely on sheet flow to convey runoff to the biofiltration swales. This should be clearly noted in the drainage report. However, all on-site runoff needs to be input at the head the water quality facility so the runoff receives full treatment. If an on-site system will be provided, then the report is to include a schematic of the system and a backwater analysis of the system upstream of the pond to show that on-site pipe sizes are adequate. The plans needs to show all downspouts tightlines. Roof drainage may bypass the water quality facility, but must not bypass the detention facility. Bypassing the roof drainage around the biofiltration swale would reduce the size of the swale. Any question regarding the memo may be directed to Scott Woodbury(425)277-5548. 98cm005D 98CM005D.DOC\ -City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1FhaA Rekuew, Wa'��. COMMENTS DUE:.JANUARY 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 06, 1998 APPLICANT: UniFirst Corporation/Gary Bigelow. PROJECT MANAW; eYWELL • PROJECT TITLE: UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT WORK ORDER NO: 78299 LOCATION: East side of Lind Avenue, North of SW 39th Street JAN i igg8 SITE AREA: 4.4 acres I BUILDING 4A(gross): 449.650 ps . t.. N SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots rang h'tn size from 36,729 sq.ft. to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code).COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information. Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services { Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment • 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS e., a l l c, € c c lj---V t Ce—Yi2 e-r L S 6 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal ( `fig Signature of Director or Authorized Represe ive Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 ' Unifirst Corp.Development Lind Ave.Betw. SW 34th&SW 41st St. EIS Development Services January 20, 1997 WATER: 1. A 15-foot utility easements required for the water loop System. 2. The proposed 8-inch loop water line is not large enough to meet the 4,000 gpm required fire flow. 3. Four(4)fire hydrants required to fire flow requirements. 4. The System Development Connection charge is$21,662.77. 5. Show irrigation meter size,location and backflow prevention d 98cm005w 98CM005W.DOC\ • CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: January 29, 1998 iiEFA TO: Mark Pywell 'Citof:67) FROM: Sonja J.Fesser O '998 0F1FCOp�C; SUBJECT: Unifirst Development Short Plat,LUA-97-159-SHPL C/ryOp �1V oNMNG Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: The recording number for the 24' building setback line (south boundary line of proposed Lot 1) is incorrectly noted. The number should be 8105040070(not 815040070). Nothing in Renton's city code requires metes and bounds legal descriptions for the newly created lots on the face of short plat documents.. Reference to "Lot of' is sufficient and anything additional is potentially fraught with error and thereby confounding. Since we don't require these legal descriptions,we will not,therefore,review them. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number (LUA-97-159-SHPL) and the city's land record number (LND-20-0220) on the drawing. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. What was,or will be, set at the new corners between proposed Lots 1 and 2? Addressing for the lots will be provided when available. These addresses will need to be noted on the drawing. The signature block for the City of Renton Development Services Director is not needed. Remove this reference from the"APPROVAL"block on the drawing. Note that if there are new restrictive covenants, agreements or easements to others, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat drawing and the previously noted document(s) are to be given to the City Clerk's office as a package. The short plat should have the first recording number. The recording number(s) for the accompanying document(s) should be referenced on the short plat drawing. \\TS SERVER\SYS2:\COMMON\-H:\FILE.SYS\LND\20\0220\RV980126.DOC\sf January 26, 1998 Page 2 Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for the preliminary review is attached for your use and information. , PROP] Y SERVICES FEE REVIEW FOR SU VISIONS No. 98-cob APPLICANT: UL11.'I ta,-T r n P (- r w L-OR'1�.U, > RECEIVED FROM �1=at=i 1. "S 1. ,+�L1t�f 01.1 L�( / (date) JOB ADDRESS: L.1I_1.1 , 1 \/F 1IDfr , 5C( �' ,sit. �- Sin/ . WO, 782Ct9 NATURE OF WORK: LND# ?o-220 PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION BYNLONG PLAT, NgED MOREMORt rNFORMATION: ❑ LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHORT PLAT,BINDING SITE PLAN,ETC. ❑ PID#'s 0 VICINITY MAP ❑ FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION,THIS REVIEW REPLACES 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 OTHER PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE ❑ SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID1/ 125�Gc�-OOG,p NEW KING CO.TAX ACCT.#(s)are required when assigned by King County. It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. ❑ The existing house on SP Lot# ,addressed as has not previously paid SDC fees,due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP Lot# will be subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. 0 We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to'review it again before recordation. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water.meters. - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER -0 - Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER _0/ Special Assessment District/WATER / O - Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER /0 - Joint Use Agreement(METRO) -0 - Local Improvement District * _0- Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION -0 - FUTURE OBLIGATIONS -Q_ SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER 0 Estimated - #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd S'Q:FTG. Single family residential$850/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park Apartment,Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq.ft.of property(not less than$850.00)x =ii452 P $ t8, 775. 58 Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 R perimeter(2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER❑ Estimated ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) ❑ Never Pd Single family residential$585/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment,Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial$0.078/sq. ft.of property x(not less than$585.00) !��' 7'z` '�1=T ��-2=lz�f,4?-�o sc�- $ 12,9Ga.oC{ SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER ❑ Estimated El Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) 0 Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x All other properties$0.129sq ft of new impervious area of property x -ra 15 1 LLt<L!.OL.01-1 A5 ci- (not less than$385.00) MII.lk.1_ "t141S tDArE. p I PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ fit UUKi..1oU.U 1ST la r7) e - C fh) `tl lls 'p 1= . of4e 1�3n/9F3 g 7 Signatu of R ewing Authority � DATE I ❑ *If subject property is within an LID,it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. C) ❑ Square footage figures are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. S, ❑ Current City SDC fee charges apply to 0 c:/temolate/feeann1/tah FFFF('TtVF 1n1., 14 100C/(1..,1 wr .. eei,c Aen-r ArAO Arir __A Ae,z- .3 of t Lum— .L- 5Hoi='1- -mL.�', LUA•g7—159- H'PL, Li_lr)-4:5-0220 • PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW # 98 -003 fit DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ❑ PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 0 OTHER / APPLICANT: �.l n/iF7 Z S-f aRAoR4-Tv ors/ RECEIVED FROM C'It7 Vag ADDRESS: 3 4 c 0 L-iti/D A-t,1 •5 ) , .. JOB / WO# date) NATURE OF WORK: (o WI rii E-igC r 4c- ,jJFJCGo•.›...,ret,r— GREEN# iil SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE 0 VICINITY MAP I ❑ NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES 0 FRONT FOOTAGE 0 OTHER I ❑ VESTED 0 NOT VESTED j 0 This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# dated 0 PARENT PID#(subject to change)_ 1 SUBJECT PROPERTY PID# /2,5:3 ,o -004,0 0 King Co.Tax Aug/(new) I It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances ' and determined by the applicable Utility Section. t Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application. The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. I _ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER —0-- Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER Joint Use Agreement(METRO) Local Improvement District * I Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00.PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS I i SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) EC Never Pd SQ.FTG. Single family residential$850/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park Apartment, Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x li Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq. ft. of property (not less than 8850.00)x __t 9/ 70 62 A ,r 21 , 6(o Z. 77 Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus IS ft perimeter moo cent threshdd X'K' A 35p 7 Z) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER gce 6�lj tt;ciy_92- . 0 Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) ® Never Pd Single family residential dwelling unit$585/unit x ' Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x Apartment, Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x _ Commercial/Industrial, $0.078/sq. ft. of property (not less than 5585.00)x /9// 706 E' 4-/S/, 9 5 3,0 b REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER ❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) Never Pd • Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x All other properties$0.129/sq ft of new impervious area of property x I/ b zy /y, 83 S, o(no than$385.00) PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ j l) L/ 3 . `I7-- ie"� lil l/q g Signature of Reviewing A thority DATE pop *If subject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. I I **The square footage figures used arc taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. g Q rhempkte/fempp tgb EFFECTIVE July 16, 1995/Ord. Nos. 4506,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 0 A' W • r° City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMEFoylaturviCOMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 4I1UARY 06, 1998 APPLICANT: UniFirst Corporation/Gary Bigelow PROJECT MANAGER: MARK R. F'WVELL PROJECT TITLE: UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT WORK ORDER NO: ,7199 „ 1998 LOCATION: East side of Lind Avenue, North of SW 39th Street SITE AREA: 4.4 acres BUILDING AREA(gross':"49.65Q �ft�ry SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq.ft. to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Jo T/ e ltv1yva s po rr- ati-l6hr �"1� ��'� a ! p�, Fee- is- $ ?) 9 75J, L 1 A 5;x (6) l f j.Je cilo 1 Y y-e /. ed 1-6 /.7e / c ff�� a ¢lz . 7 A a -F - /r%r P a n L/+z J / IBC' o c W f'1i �c�1/ / t 4 1 D R"'<f-c 1- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /3 �yJ /7 /o Signature of Director or Authorized Re sentative Dat DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • 3 2.. ,�eVY O Gn Aral YP_LT _..; : ....... Q •ry a �. W2,,mtviivE FEE Project Name 111 T i V S- Project Address 3`(- 7 Livid Av6 5 (V(V Contact Person 13 &u.v l ,rig/o-C) L) ) f,vs� (nip , Address 15 4 ( i tC✓e 1 I Road) Fvcw k h i T k 3 70 6 Phone Number (6 /`) ) -7c / - 6RC?�t• Permit Number LUI4 - 1 7 - 15 cl Project Description C-ow/57%4 ct a .1O C-SO s.f. comivievcis/ lt<t.cWavv. Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential ❑ ITE Trip Generation Manua! ❑ etail [Traffic Study a Non-retail 0 Other • Calculation: P�1 Tv4045/00 /044%7 vepovt /33 dct v)ps �2,.t 47S f..�, tv)f . • ()33) ( #?5 ) = 4. qq75' c'° Transportation Mitigation_ Fee: qq 7 9, Calculated by: I ) C(/4TZ Date: i/6 A Account Number: 447-3 -5- 8f)-`7"—Q�- 'vi4 Date of Payment • FAT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works F/RFpRo�F/R • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVJ iW kit 0737. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: fire 9AGVGVh"t'((r1,1 COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY i° 98� '9999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 06, 1998 / 4...,„ APPLICANT: UniFirst Corporation/Gary Bigelow PROJECT MANAGER: MARK R. PYWELL • PROJECT TITLE: UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT WORK ORDER NO: 78299 . LOCATION: East side of Lind Avenue, North of SW 39th Street SITE AREA: 4.4 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 49.650 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq.ft. to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health- Public Services Energy/ HistoddCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Y / • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS IC C. CODE-RELATED COMMEN We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where addition I information is ded to properly assess this proposal. Ad AvVe 09Y Signatu-e• ''rector or Author ed R resentative Date DEVAPP.+� Rev.10/93 TY C.) 0sft + , CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: January 7, 1998 TO: Peter Rosen, Planner FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Unifirst Corp. Development, Lind v. & SW 34th Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary required fire flow is 4000 GPM. This requires a looped fire main and four fire hydrants. One hydrant is required within 150 feet of the building and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building. A looped fire main is required by City Ordinance. 2. A sprinkler system and fire alarm system are required. Separate plan - and permits are required for these systems. 3. A fire mitigation fee is required for new buildings at $.52 a square foot. The mitigation fee based on 49,650 square feet is $25818.00. 4. Provide a list of any flammable or combustible liquids and chemicals to be used or stored in the building. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City'J.^lenton Department of Planning/Building/F . _ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: KylesCOMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 06, 1998 APPLICANT: UniFirst Corporation/Gary Bigelow PROJECT MANAGER: MARK R. PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT WORK ORDER NO: 78299 LOCATION: East side of Lind Avenue, North of SW 39th Street SITE AREA: 4.4 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 49.650 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq.ft. to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Alr Aesthetics Water LIghVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities • Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment • 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet `q B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 1--z) A'7 _c/f )/4v2e)--icel C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS \V41e aVa._ -- 1-?9/- 74D /°1414-7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those a eas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this propo 1. / f %7 I lr gnature of Director or Authorized Repres�e Dat��e DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Aw-Fbrl- COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 06, 1998 APPLICANT: UniFirst Corporation/Gary Bigelow PROJECT MANAGER: MARK R. PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT WORK ORDER NO: 78299 • LOCATION: East side of Lind Avenue, North of SW 39th Street SITE AREA: 4.4 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 49.650 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq.ft. to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth X Housing X Air x Aesthetics X Water X Light/Glare X Plants X Recreation X Land/Shoreline Use X Utilities X Animals X Transportation X Environmental Health X Public Services X Energy/ X Historic/Cultural X Natural Resources Preservation AirportEnvironment n0 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet no None B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS The proposed building is located outside of the airport horizontal and conical surfaces, and approximately 14,500 south of the airport. • • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS None We have reviewed thi =pplication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where •. .'tonal info •n is needed to properly assess this proposal. • . Lt( Wg Signatu of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP••• Rev.10/93 .„ ,,,un C -_IE:E=E:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::- __====r=== _�_ __ • r tea•- ."r /--= rr'rr_=_- �I cai I/a n, w NH (} PP ===_=====__ _==_====____======____ J __=_======_==_=__-_,_ ___- _ _ ___-=-=_-=__= =---_____=_-=_-_- — 1.,,Iti— \\Y �� - w � �� 1 j �t11144silora up,42_4- 1 :_lir I aims i , ._:-:::::-_--___,_,_:::::„:7=rip.„,::::::::::::::_:_-_:_:::-,-a:E::::::::::::::__________:_:_:::::-::::::::::::::,::_:_,_,_,_:_:_:„!1 -_ _= _ =-___=_=__==== ===- lin o. / , e, ' _�I� � -=== =======- =====-= _===_=========___ r c i__ ======__======-==_ _=-=====_==__============_= ===_===fie== ., - �_ f-�' QI 1/-1;;;) -'.--i 4 -iii,:::::::.:E:E:E:E::-;::E::::2-7::::::.]::::::E.:2:4-"-e_.__,,,:-::::::::::::::::-:-:-:-:--:-H-::::::::::::::::::::::::: :-:-:-:-::-.N r . .• .-. Tr= - - ---s.‘ - .4. ‘---::::::::::::::::-:::- --33E--331-13E:::::::::::::::::::::::::E:E:::::: -::::::::::::::::_I k., w 1 j, , virlii, .,, p7 ., pi,,, 110.1•TW,c, ii.--. ---7-7-------7-47:-::::::::::::::::::::ELK:K=E:3::::::::::::::::::::::::::E:]: :E:Ef_o_o- arc if0 RE 1,1 Milltiri --- - ' \.- 1.. i , Niv ea ...Nitc,m,-41 ---f:_::::-=:-_- --:::::::-::-:EL-Er.:-.7:_.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::-- -,- . A ' -IlaireT _e- liriej: 1:4331 Q i Tat ji '"" :s 1 �o� ®gyp :. ilri-Ez)g)41 �\W ilf 111111 _ �I®__ �i1 nu 23 , 1,Ir _I �I �� fit. 111 �`NM IT)nil �!3 • •W , �'�Ili__ L,.! I t ,,,,i4, , • 441,1p,-ii gig -' 'A ; ;;t$44 \ 1%ITE !orgivit-7-ft,' ramitilim / \+11 kr :74."-4 r illiti- P4 , ...1),,Li40 al*Nivo - % 7 oF i.,J,,.,,,,,,,,, _\1 ' _ 1 -' P -fir-- - ndpe ./ b r ,� .,_, ,....,11 � io�ii' /to4 !, - P� , . J >^'� ii Wit .. ' +`4,44a_ 1 m ,. C. _ TL CA _ jII`�rTrL , , - --Nyi...w/vm..-..t1.„:4_....pkti- I '1 1 1 11'.!;FA 1 k r_ 7-1 - it.. 1 : In. 1.‘ `Ztitt`"'-/1,:tr 'a" I(Li,g Fil'fil g ' Af11604- 3 - 474 I P1;71 i iii V i iji I deeZ7L' -ik 'fjt,tia -- A / ..c°_..)./... A,r•1 • La, bn �\ \'1 e'"�®gip" .0 FI� .I� ©y .r i a- n-• • ^O• ■ . Niii .�� or :?„m-- .40k,\\, c..- ni. �: / ,_,,.„....,,,Itilimiliiir,1 . — a k 'rui k 1 ._, ' N." ,(4k141.-?& ,. s) - , 121-7/, 141,4At.-----rep, 2 _., N. , - I , _...., grInow. -,is " NVIIIIIII IiI- ,� ,r.n a ,wp ,.4ow,it, . T ca 1 tn•n I Il[w.l6=�1�� 0 `114*-.,i ,,----_,_3.--__: .,,,_\i,,,. CIS/ � r4 ��...�. I' } PROJECT NARRATIVE POWELL SHORT PLAT OF LOT 7,BNBSP RENTON, WASHINGTON Powell-Orilla Associates is proposing a three lot short plat of the existing Lot 7, Burlington Northern Binding Site Plan. The property is located on Lind Avenue SW approximately 500 feet south of SW 34th Street. The property is adjacent and bounded by the U.S. Rentals and Far West Steel sites on the north, HomeBase and Act III Theater sites on the east, and the Corporate Express Headquarters on the south. Separating the proposed Lots 1 and 2 is a 30-foot access easement connecting the Act III Theater site to Lind Avenue across from it's intersection with SW 39th Street. The purpose of this short plat is to create a site for the UniFirst development -to be located on the proposed Lot 3. At this time,there is no development anticipated for the proposed Lots 1 and 2. The proposed Lot 3, for UniFirst Corporation, is to be developed into a 46,000 square foot laundry facility and office. Please see"Project Narrative-UniFirst Corporation". Prior to any development on the proposed Lots 1 and 2, the normal Site Plan and Environmental Approval documents will be prepared and submitted. We believe that the above information is consistent with the submittal requirements for a Short Plat for the proposed three lots. More detailed information for the proposal for Lot 3 is enclosed. • RECEIVED 1997 CFV N CITYOFR pa A" N • City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/.public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: cztritVUkchifi1rt Sey„«eq COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 06, 1998 APPLICANT: UniFirst Corporation/Gary Bigelow PROJECT MANAGER: MARK R. PYWELL O Olt PROJECT �� PROJECT TITLE: UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT WORK ORDER NO: 78299 ��,,1)VTpA/ LOCATION: East side of Lind Avenue, North of SW 39th Street ,� y8 SITE AREA: 4.4 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 49.650 sq.ft. 1-,4iv SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging in size from 35, E to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximate 2 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment • 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS y f r ! O�/O LrJ vi4 arty 1 I�Z a� 2 4-r U vl Q l �:1 ( c 03 le_r .('CEOGvl 5 p ra -I(o t.\ E;ci - -( Yav ( CI� � G -- ���t,✓fa^-y r Lj Gyre)L.11 n We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. C— ter,. = r(-� 7/1 f Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da e DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: V'b%icc COMMENTS DUE: JANUARY 20, 1998 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 06, 1998 APPLICANT: UniFirst Corporation/Gary. Bigelow PROJECT MANAGER: MARK R. PYWELL PROJECT TITLE UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT WORK ORDER NO: 78299 . LOCATION: East side of.Lind Avenue, North of SW 39th Street SITE AREA: 4.4 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 49.650 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging in size from 36,729 sq.ft. to 192,561 sq.ft. and to construct a 49,680 sq.ft. building on the Northern most lot. The proposed building will be approximately 25 feet tall. It will be used for a commercial laundry. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Ught/Glare Plants Recreation LandlShoieline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services ,1/ Energy/ Hlstoric/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet eonpitm. x2Arei daec/e-uf. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impactor areas where additi nal information is needed to properly ass this proposal. /7C % Y�v 0'o - Signature o irector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 PROJECT LUA-97-159 SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Unifirst Development City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 25.67 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and any construction trailer should be completely fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private property. Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use, and should also have a heavy-duty deadbolt installed with no less then a 1-1/2" throw when bolted. Glass windows in the trailer should be shatter-resistant. I also recommend the business post the appropriate"No Trespassing" signs on the property while it's under construction(flier attached). This will aid police in making arrests on the property after hours if suspects are observed vandalizing or stealing building materials. COMPLETED BUILDING It's important to direct any and all foot traffic into the main front entrance that should be monitored during all hours of business. This will provide the building the control it will need to keep track of the comings and goings of all visitors. Any other exterior doors should be by coded access only to prevent trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property. All doors should be made of a solid core wood or metal with auxiliary locking devices with latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks. All doors should have peepholes installed to assist in easy identification of anyone outside the facility. Proper security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lots, along the walkways, and in the rear and side of the building as well. All areas for loading and unloading need to be properly lit for the safety of customers and employees. It is recommended that the building have a monitored security alarm installed, with all doors leading to the outside having the words"Alarmed Door" in red lettering, at least 6" Page 1 of 2 PROJECT LUA-97-159 SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Unifirst Development City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) in height placed on the outside of each door to deter any criminals from breaking in at these points of entry. Landscaping around the exterior of the building should not be too dense or high. It is important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the building the look of a fortress and possibly give a burglary sufficient coverage to break into the facility, especially during the hours of darkness. Page 2 of 2 -�-� pl I- Trespaès usmiEs Enforcement WATCH • Quite often, business owners and managers are faced with crimes that occur on the property after the businesses are closed and the employees have gone home. Some of the crimes that occur are burglary, vandalism, graffiti, trespassing, drug dealing and robbery in the parking lots. There is a way for police and business owners to discourage these types of crimes from taking place on private property, and that is by enforcing the City of Renton's Municipal Trespass Code 6-18-10. In order for police to be able to make an arrest for Trespass, business owners or managers need to purchase signs and display them in conspicuous areas on the property. These signs need to include the following language: 1. Indicate that the subject property is privately owned and; 2. Uninvited presence on the specified property is not permitted during the hours the business is closed, and; • 3. Violators will be subject to criminal sanctions pursuant to Renton City Code 6-18-10. MOST IMPORTANTLY-THE SIGNS SHOULD BE CONSPICUOUS FROM ALL POSSIBLE POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY,AND ALSO BE PLACED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS. This way when a suspect is arrested, he/she will not be able to claim as a defense that he/she did not know he or she was trespassing. EXAMPLES FOR TRESPASS SIGNS: NO TRESPASSING NO TRESPASSING This is private property. Persons without specific No Trespassing after business hours business are not authorized to be on the premises between (insert specific times). Anyone on the the hours of(insert the hours your business is closed). premises after business hours is subject to Violators are subject to arrest and/or citation for criminal arrest and/or citation for Criminal Trespass pursuant to Renton City Code#6-18-10.. Trespass and/or impoundment of vehicle. Per Renton City Code #6-18-10. By enforcing the Trespass Ordinance, business owners and police will be sending a message to criminals that they are not allowed to conduct criminal activity on the property. In making arrests for Trespass, police may be preventing the more serious crimes from taking place. ��Y 0 COURTESY OF RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT m CRIME PREVENTION UNIT 235- 2571 rJI-- Fir-- - . . 4 • > EVELO PME::;:>T ::<::<::<R.„.•••:>. DI` ISION ` >>'>>> <., > > >` >' ,,,-.:I'< s <0 S C S V ' ' LI ���� I O .` S UR ��O U::;:::D`I '. G PR ���..�: ERTY 0 :::::.N :R :_:: :. th r 300.>f et ititI iei. u e e:::<>::>::<:>:::.:::>::»:«<::::>-.::::>:::::<>::::::::<;i..<:::<::>::<<: »>:<i.,i>:::: :<>:;:><:::>;::>::::>::::>:<:<::;<»> »::> <:><:::>::>::>: ::>:::: ::>:<_::>>:::«:>::><: >wit n..30 .. eet.o..t e..s b ct..sit ..... ........... .... PROJECT NAME: akicieril DCVtlotowlint ' APPLICATION NO: LUa 91 - 159„, SA-A I SI,PI-A-1 lam( The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. . NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER , 125360-0010-07 125360-0020-05 G I JOSS INC 679999 HCWA REALTY -.CORP 440919 • 9505 BOECKMAN RD C/0 HOMEBASE ':SUPPORT CENTER WILSONVILLE •OR 97070 3345 MICHELSON DR IRVINE CA 92715 125360-0030-03 125360-0040-01 ; EASTGATE THEATRE INC 660683 POWELL-ORILLIA L L •C 769999 DBA RENTON CINIP9AS 41311 737 MARKET ST 919 SW TAYLOR STE 900 KIRKLAND WA 98033 PORTLAND OR 97205 125360-0050-08 125360-.0070-04 POWELL-ORILLIA L' L. C ' 769999 . POWELL?ORILLIA 'L •LIC 769999 737 MARKET... ST 737 MARKET ST KIRKLAND WA- . 98033 ' ' KIRKLAND -WA 98033 125360-0080-02 125380-0170-09 FARWEST . STEEL CORPORATION99 , .:-. - VALLEY; INDUSTRIAL.: BUILDING. 301603'-' . 6799 ' • PUOEBOX '889 • ''' C/O R . J HALLISSEY CO INC -AGT I EUGENE OR 97403 12835 BEL-RED RD STE 140 • BELLEVUE . WA 98005 125381-0010-02 125381-0020-00 ARENSBERG INVESTMENTS 773517 A-HE :BOEING COMPANY 650035 ' 3401 LIND AVE SW PO ,BOX 3703 M/S ;11F-09 RENTON • WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98124 125381-0040-06 � ti 'D' , PUGET SOUND BLOOD CENTER C 759999 921 TERRY AVE '. C ^ i '�, 1997, SEATTLE WA 98104 ,-..` .' - 17E� �0 I cigT p NNINP otrOF�ENTON - .. (Attach additional sheets, if necessary). ,4." li e . (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • Applicant Certification I, �,r�ece f .Y , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: 0 City of Renton Technical Services Records 0Jitle Company Records King County Assessors Records Signed 4 / Date 9'2�'97 GGG (Applic t) NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at '3o" r.I. on the ° day of — , 199, Signed ` �� ✓�i ��� 1 NOTARY PUBLIC g STATE OF WASHINGTO,N (Notary Public) • MICHAEL G.MICKIEWICZ my eppol 1➢nelS CXpliea dunes I tv , , `:<'r ><> er`..,•�;;.<tha„>no c o... h.e.. ro osed..a c t o .. a.e.ma ed.to .• eb�'° e t es t a <::.�::i..:!t.Y..:imp....K.e...).::::::.:::::.�:.:..::.::.::.:::.:::::...:.:..:..... ...:..:•...:...:...:.:.:....:............:::....: ...:..:..:.::::.::::::..::::...::.:::::...:.:::..:.......:....::...::::.:::.:::..�::::::::. :::::.......................................:.::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,::.�:::::::::::::. :: .yv::::j::<:i:!?y::::y::?:::!iJ�;:�:�:::j}}:"}.':•'i:::::::::: ':::Y:i:i±':,v::::iji'::y::�iDv::....[::<:C::(i!i:(<:::L:i:L...........:.::v::w:::v.. v. ••<NO. ARYL•••••••::::€••••. >;> »:':>': >'>` :>'>»>> >>`><: '•` : > :•: } .:::........: ... .:.. :..:::.....:...:...:...:.::::... ..:....:::.:..:....::: ::v:::.::� .� .: ;�":`(�' �:*i.:�:.�:::::::::�.:�:.�..::::::.�::::::::.� ):::v:::::::::::::::w::. v4•:::::v::::.�:::::::::::::::.�:::._:::::::.:�:::::::::::•::•::•:::•.�:v::::::::::::::v::::n::�:.�::.�::.:�::w:::::. listprop.doc' REV 07/95 MARILYN_KAMCHFFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 2 li' • fO� t�'NTO� • NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: JANUARY 06,1998 , A Master Application has been filed end accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The ' following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBERMAME: LUA-97-169,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF/UNIFIRST DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks to subdivide an existing parcel into three lots ranging In size from 38,729 sq.ft.to 192,561 sq.R,and to construct a 49,880 sq.R.building on the Northern most lot. The proposed • building will be approximately 25 feet tall.It will be used for a commordal laundry.. . GENERAL LOCATION: East side of Und Avenue,North of SW 39th Street STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: • Wetlands Analysis by&Twelve Assoc. Geotechnic Report by Terra Associates Conceptual Drainage Report by Treece&Co. ' PUBUC APPROVALS: Environmental Review ' Administrative Site Plan Approval Administrative Shod Plat Approval Comments an the above application must be submitted In writing to Mark R.Pywell,Project Manager,Development , Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on February 23,1998.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record end receive additional notification by mail,contact Mr.Pywell at (425)277.5586.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified , of any decision on this project. • I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: OCTOBER 21.1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPUCATION: JANUARY 00,1998 • DATE OF NOTICE OF APPUCATION: JANUARY 08,1998 J .. f — — C I — ,-I 1,-Fili/ Aa9 ./ rn 7 li, ,,-,,_ . a.e. • .. ., I i. . . • CEroMLOT.DOC CERTIFICATION • 1, n�-� .l I tAha,r/ , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on • �O4AWA°(t 1 6/ /9`jt3 Signed: • jykie, STATE'OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS ` COUNTY OF KING ) I. certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �fr7 I . ssgne d ihis instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and vol l ntary act for the uses t. _ , and.purposes mentioned in the instrument. - Dated: 3o0/11r, /g4 J--7z? Notary Pu c in and for the Stal o ashinglon Notary (Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFE ___ My appointment) . CIZ OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 5, 1998 Mr. Barton Treece, Jr. Treece&Company 320 Second Avenue South,#200 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: Unifirst Development Project No. LUA-97-159,SA-A,SHPL-A,ECF Dear Mr. Treece: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on February 3, 1998. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at (425) 277-5586, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mark R. :47-;11,AICP Project • -nager • cc: Mr. Gary Bigelow/UniFirst Corporation Powell-Orilla Associates/Owners ACCPTI TR rWW 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 C• This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer 11/21/1997 11:22 2068228758 H D A PAGE 01 PAGE 2i 2 • • .. .1: 1 .,1..,`71 TERRA ASSOCIATES Inc. i, 4 Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering,Geology and • • • Environmental Earth Sciences • • • • • • November 20, 1997 • • • • Mr_Bart Treece /� • Treece and Company 'Pe' 320 2nd Avenue South,Suite 200 lv®V • Kirkland,Washington 98033 p % Ain Subject_ Soil Conditions and Ponded-Water �,Op �Pu SW 34th Street and Lind Avenue SW R ToNIVG Renton,Washington Dear Bag: • As you art aware Terra Associates provided geotechnical engineering services- for several structures constructed On property southwest of the above subject intersection in Renton, Washington. These , • structures included Home Base. Act Three Theaters, Tarwest Steel, and US Rentals. We also recently completed a geoteclriioal engineering design study for a proposed commercial laundry facility south'of the VS-Rentals site. You have asked us to comment on the above subject,based on our experience in the area. • For each of these projects we completed a soils investigation which involved the drilling of several soil test borings- The results of these studies indicate that as a whole soil conditions underlying the area are relatively uniform,consisting of-fve to seven feet of fill overlying alluvial sediments. The fill is uniform throughout the area Consisting of.a well compacted silty sand with gravel. Because of its.composition and • • ' compact nature, the fill exhibits a relatively low permeability and will restrict the vertical.migration or . infiltration:of rainfall. This characteristic along with the relatively flat site topography has resulted in . • ponding of rainfall in areas of the site.in the past. We trust the information presented is sufficient to meet your current needs. Should you have any questions or require additional information,please call. - • . Sincerely yours, -- . ___ . . .... . Post-Ir Fax Note 7671 natelAvn(pg s. T >!i SSOCI TES, Toliarki, ;" :r7 Co/Dept-Phone Nore J.Se e ,P.E. Principal Engine Fax Fax 7.11 ►,,, Fax • • 72525 Willows Road,Suite 101'. Kirkland,Washington 98034 • Phone(425)821-7777 I IIIIIIIIII�pII V-1TIII III III���Villl , - -' =. -twelve Associates •I, • (v) Suite ! In c , . C ( '253-852 4732', �. . '`' t' `' ' Kent;:WA 98042:5751: (`e)6.12assoc @ compuservecoin . 1:7 November;17i. 1997.. ll 14Y97 Mr Mark*Pywell of T P Project-Manager: T No,' ',. •., .City of.`Renton> 200 Mill:Avenue South : - , , • Renton`'WA''.98055'. ;,, .,•; . Short P1at -'Lot #7`- Wetland Determination I S. B-twelve Job#96-174,.. j Dear:'1Vlark;. :This letter revises'and supersedes information provided-to you in ourletter`dated November .' .'` 12,'1997.""Specifically, this-letter'has,.been revised to include data'sheets from:our.site.visit as;'.'' i ' • <' r �' ' well as recentr.discussions'with the'ArmyCorps of Engineers`on this projec i • 'This`letter'is a:clarification'bf our wetland;determination"for Powell Lot"#7,, located on'the east ' 'side Of,.Lind Avenue, in the=City of.Renton;,Washington`: Specif cally,'this letter.is intended '% to review the'history of the site to'answer'questions raised by City:`.of enton in your'letter,to : .'_project':engineer:Bart�'Treece, date4October.-23, 1997.E Your,letter states that previous work: • •--`conducted;on the:site,by.Dav,id'Evans &.Associates as Well'ashe-Citys'wetland-inventory,;• , 'identified:wetlands pn'the:site I^have'reviewed the available information,and:have concluded that based upon',todays regulations;=.there s':no,.solidevidence'that`any:j'urisdietional'wetlands' ' existed on this'site following of the site in the.1.970'.s; The following,linformation irs ;•-•provided as albasis'for this conclusion - ' According to the Soil.Survey fot King County'Area, Washington.(Snyder et,al 1973);,,the;., , <: entire,site as:containing`;Snohomish series'(So) soils..'Snohomish,soils,are a-poorly ' ` ' " ,drained'silt'loam;formed-in'alluvium and:ar6considered hydric'soils:according to'the C publication Flydric Soils-of the United'States'(USDA:NTCHS,Pub No.1491;,-199'1),.; However;,' � ` , • `:;,' theentire'site was filled"'in`1974,.burying.,the\mapped Snohomish ser_es under,gravelly fill:;'. T. Was -'was laced.on'the site'_im'1982/83 b t' p y: he owner'af that:time"(Burlington �� �' ' Northern.1 ailroad . Our_<soil its excavated'.throughout the.site Ieveal ravell' •fill material with _various:colors and textures.- 'of Terra'Associates, Inc: Geotechri ca'l report_ l , re ared-for the site and dated 2-9-96 indicates that there'is a roximatel S feetof ' it 'compacted:',(preloaded) fill-material over:the native Soils:'-TheiTerra report also'indicates'that i • - ' thegroundwater level on the site was generally. at a''de the of;7 feet below'ex stin rades. • • J Powell Lot#7/Job#96-174 A , B-twelve.Associates, Inc: ' ;•I n ,,_ ' November`17; 1997 • •\ Page 2 r. -. •Data collecionfor the King County,Soil Survey..was,conducted'between-1.966=1969.` The ' . Survey..states that the mapping and documentation.represents,conditions:'in 1969:s'Since the i' ' ' filling took after,1969,'this unit of fill.-missed being'mapped as 1Urban soils';(Ur)_by the 1,' „ Soil'ConservationServic'e:' Urban soils are not considered:hydr c soils: ;Additionally, a recent' interpretation by the;US Army':;Corps of Engineers,in 1995.has',resulted in the Corps ot: i regulating..wetlands;that`have emerg'ed`,onlegall'y placed;compact fill;material in the•.valley. 'I' ' '1 • discussed the'site conditions-with:Gail'Tern.of the Regulatory;Branch of;the"Army Corps\of Engineers on November;1'3,.1997. Gail had worked`--on the original•approval of.the Pace • 'I,; project and was familiar with-the._site =•Gail said;,that, i the"C' orps-:would not:•regulate, `this,area as' • 1 . :Wetland,' { . wetland, nor if the Pace property was tonOf.sif)thepace'proPerty was.to'be_Teviewed.,af this date;_would they,regulate.that today as they'did in•1991. .The Corps considers these,areas of fill-Where some-wetland cnaracteristics'develo 'as.non-regulated fill material'compacted{durngIh e construction process: These areas are.''sp'ecifically not regulated under the Clean"Water`Act, 'representing only recently 'compacted soil.that-now holds wateras-a,result'of disturbance.. Gail:stated that'r ,` • in order for the,Army Corps_to..put,this in writing'I would ned to send them a letter' requesting.a jurisdictional':call on-the 'site:,:They'Would then respond:in writing, re-iterating _the above: ''-I amending this request to the'Corps,to'day: David,Evans,& Asociates;:Inc. -(DEA),conducted wetland studies of the site',and;its•vicinity.in•.. ' November of:1991-: The results of-their findin ggs'are described.in-a report entitled.Wetland , . ,P. ,; ._Determination'on`the-Pace.-Property, Renton=Washington.'(David'=Evans!&;Associates, Inc) : .. '',dated,December-'18, •199 L: :Thi-s,.report was;written specifically Or the development of the- = , Pace:Membership..Warehouse but also•included delineation onr:Lot;#7:as depicted,on'DEA's •":plans"included.with this`report. As'described'in DEA-'s e site'has,been f lled about: 18"years''ago and`no%iw supports predominantly grasses,and'other weedyand`invasive emergent '4" vegetations"."'-DEA investigated-.the site=on-Novembe'r;15, 1991.. The species of vegetation'that_ , . . "1 2. .2 the areas':they called wetlands are generally facultative and are commonly, ;.,'found iri compact:soil's;'tire'ruts and disturbed sites:, 'Most:of,these species,can become ` '. established in a matter._of months in%disturbed soils.'arid-often only'indicate,the`.most recent soil y • moi-sture'condit on, not:necessarily:long term conditions. - According to Table 2: in the DEA'report.text,:hydrology indicators that,were evidenced,in l data plots were,all"assumed"•or."absent" DEA's:Table:2,indicates that:noldirect; • f .. '''observations>of.wetland:,hydrology;,were,evident,`duringthe site'visit. This conflicts;with of the data sheets in the report that indicate Some standing water was present in:some areas: However; there is.,no.map.to.,indicate'where these,observations.were made:.or.what delineated area they.were taken\in.: In.most of western:Washington'-at"low elevations such'as,the site, the , ' general rule is"that the.mesic growing:season-'(March-1,-October.3'1) is used;in wetland ;h"drolo determiriation`s's. A IDe t of Ecolo • :1997). 'Observations'after-October.31 'such ' • ' y gy , _ (W, p, gyp . .,.., . . <, �. " � , .. � DEA,observed..for their;delineations; 'are riot considered:'accurate indicators of wetland`, ' `hydrology:during:•the growing.season: ,� In summary,;there is°Soil Survey,evidence that wetlands may have e)iisted'on-the site prior:to placement-'of fill in 1974. In 1974•the site was filled with,approximatel.,5_'feet;of fill for' the ,( ; / Powell Lot#7/Job#96-174,1 `} B-twelve Associates,Tnc. �'- , ` ,j November 17;:1997' t: , Page'3' .�: ;purpose of:pre:load:'in.creating a commercial%light'industrial building.;site. It:can,be'safely;. . ,. ,'assumed`that placement:of this`fill eliminated`the':previously existing.wetlands:and isolated any • . underlying.•wetland hydrology and.soils'from re-emerging on the:surface./ Ths';area;has,been ' regularly maintained,through mowing.for the purpose of_keeping the site`in a condition „conducive-to_Marketability. Yn 1991; a delineatio'n,'of,wetland.vegetation and•possibl' some '^ hydrology'was,conducted'by IDEA in the non-growing season::This'd elineation ' 'as transferred ;to the City of Renton-Wetland Inventory'maps following permitting approval of the Pace`',;; _ L ro ect: s Since;evidence of wetland,hydrolo has not'been verified.in-=thegrowingseason this. essentially was a-one. arameter lants delineation.,,,As a;result `I:feelthat there`is:no verifiable evidence that"any'areas'that,could,,be identified as wetlands-have,existed on'.the site 1: :since'fillin n -1974.: Additionall' , m�" conversation.with'.Gail.•Ter,zi of pie-Army corps of - Engineers'reveale,. t take • a it -. „true , U'Ll'�at(ne•corps;��'111' I10� jCiTlSuicu^vu.vf a.y.icea� That`lial'„'s_"'.. F' -.Wetland characteristics (even if they meet-Atypical situation criteria) :that have emerged on this', compact`fill material,in the Glacier Park area at`this time.' : -,During my visits.to;the,site in the last two,years; I have:found:the site-to be sparsly vegetated `' with invasive weeds'.such as Cat';s ear.' H ochaeris, radicals-. tans Tanaceturii vul are and some cottonwood,(Populus balsamifera)'seedlings, and'_compried'entirely of gravelly fill `''material.(see`attached-=datasheets).:,No areas'•.'of wetland soil,'vegetation or hydrology were observed-On',the site. However;°a.;wetland.mitigation'.project'located'.behind Home.Base is, located:along,the east-70'feet,of the site.-', A vegetated berm-defines°`the west edge of this ? • protected" sensitive area This,Was,the only of wetland found:on or near'the l site. c If',you,have any,questions,or require additional'information.please feel:free-to contact.Me at �' ;, (253)•'859.-0515.` :; Sincerely,, B-twelv.`e Associates Inc: Ed'Sewall'; Senior` eparid,tabiogist,.:- % :' File:Ea/v617404:doe`'' = CC: Peter Powell :Powell Development,Co.- :Bart Treece- Treece:En ineerin` Gail Terz -:US;Army;,Corps'of Engineers ‘ _ ROUTINE WETLAND DETERNIINATION DATA FORM (US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, January 1987) B-TWELVEASSOCIATES, INC. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent, Washington 98032 (206)859-0515 /� Project Name/#: ?Oa l°f .7 Date: /0-,_'$ Investigator: fl ge"""Ut Data Point: D V Jurisdiction: C/ e' moo'' State: Wk Atypical Analysis: 7e.s Problem Area: Na rill pg4 .J.� VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum Indicator Coverage % 1. Por.I i.J , s i 2. )po rS .iii c rsol�� . . fl F� U /0 3. 7-~otee/v,.. v l.7•.ram /� /�-. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: 3 Av Hydrophytic vegetation criteria met:J YesNMarginal Comments: Ala Su/' ite J SOILS Mapped Soil Series: 5,v64..i--1,3 On Hydric Soils List?: 'tee No Drainage Class: Depth(0 in) Matrix color Redox concentration color Text red`/ /G in. /0/2 in. in. Organic soil , Histic epipedon_, Hydrogen sulfide_, gleyed , redox concentrations_, redox depletions_,pore linings_, iron concretions , manganese concretions_, organic matter in surface horizon (sandy soil)_, organic streaking (sandy soils)_, organic pan (sandy soil) . Hydric soil criteria met: Yes t Basis:/ No / ` Comments: /'✓As F1/e 4 /�/ /774/ .�✓G 1..�.. Pti su iCf HYDROLOGY Recorded data_, inundation , saturation ,watermarks , drift lines , sediment deposits drainage patterns / Wetland hydrology criteria met: Yes (IA Basis: NO 12.1d, Comments: A SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19.7" depth: /v,4-' Growing Season?:( N Hydrophytic vegetation: yn Hydric soils: VCR) We nd hydrology: Y/ Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: Yes NO I ~ ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM (US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, January 1987) B-TWELVE ASSOCIATES, INC. 1103 West Meeker Street Kent, Washington 98032 (206)859-0515 Project Name/#: /a"' /o./ / Date: /0'/-/ Investigator: I Data Point: DP7Z Jurisdiction: e,'A7 OF lam^-tom^/ State: "* Atypical Analysis: y t,S Problem Area: fvo VEGETATION Dominant plant species Stratum Indicator Coverage % 1. 70-etct7L v4-t.. A' ►"Z /S 2. P/.,af c AL FA-c. 3. "Ale 0 !6i a e°/!i 3 �®.ar.e'o..a` /41.- PACE 4. 5. 6. 7 8 9. 10. % of species OBL, FACW and/or FAC: 3 v Hydrophytic vegetation criteria met: Yes 6(o_ Marginal Comments: SOI Mapped Soil Series: <-5-1•1#1'°^'S On Hydric Soils List?tir No Drainage Class: Depth(0 in) Matrix color Redox concentration color Texture /6 in. fAe A 5 - -I C��r��4-74- in. in. in. Organic soil_, Histic epipedon_, Hydrogen sulde , gleyed , redox concentrations_, redox depletions_,pore linings_, iron concretions_, manganese concretions_, organic matter in surface horizon (sandy soil)_, organic streaking (sandy soils)_, organic pan (sandy soil)_. Hydric soil criteria wet: Yesg Basis: Comments: ��/eal . � df Gam.-/1 c f S" , / 1 74 HYDROLOGY Recorded data_, inundation , saturation ,watermarks , drift lines , sediment deposits drainage patterns Nv � ��� Wetland hydrology criteria met: Yes (9 Basis: i e Comments: SUMMARY OF CRITERIA Soil Temp. at 19.7" depth: "4 Growing Season?:ON _'� Hydrophytic vegetation: Y/9 Hydric soils: Y/ l3 We id hydrology: la Data point meets the criteria of a jurisdictional wetland?: Yes MO ,Ask • B-twelve Associates, Inc. 1/w---mq=ll1117 1103 W. Meeker St. (v)253-859-0515. '"': �11, Him Suite 253-852-4732 Kent,WA 98032-5751 - (e)bl2assoc@compuserve.com ,•r r , . , . November,l7, 1997 US Army Cops-of Engineers - Regulatory Branch.. P.O'::Box:3755 • Seattle, Washington 98124"375.5 = - RE:-` Powell Lot:#7 - City of.Renton ;B-twelve.Job#96-174 Dear;Gail As we discussed on the telephone on November-13,-1.997, I,am sending you this letter" torequest a jurisdictional determination on this acre site_referred to as Powell Lot #7 the City of,Renton, Washington (see attached map)::.Specifically, the site is - located on the east side of-Lind Avenue betWeen SW,4lst Street and SW 34th Street, and consists of a large fill.:pad placed.in the. 1970's:.' This area was part of&.previous - jurisdictional call for a.project called the Pace Property"._and-was:described in a David~, •<::';`; 11. Evans`&_Associates Report dated December_18,.1991 To assist you in,this , .: determination-I have included two (2).'letters I have prepared:in reference to the site for • :the City.of Renton: If.;you have any questions please feel free to contact..me at (253) 859-0515'. . S ce e y. .B-twelve Associates, Inc:; Ed Sewall Senior Wetland Ecologist:..: . - Illil B-'twelve Associ•ates, Inc. " �h°' .v �\/ins - •; xihV %m�=1 1� 1103.W. Meeker St •` • (v),253-859;0515 47.111�,�—T ioorl ( 253 852 4732; Suite.0 ,., : I. Kent,,WA.98032-5751 (e)bl2assoc@compuserve.corn I ; Novenmber"'12;•.1997 _f-,- ; : , 'Mark:Pywell,;'. 4!" . 1 Pro'ect Manager; ; h - City of.Renton :," 200 Mill Avenue South. - = '- ,, RE: ' :, Powell:Short Plat- Lot*7 - Wetland'Determination .- r Bj-twelve.Job#96-1'74 / •This letter- is,a clarification of'.our wetland,determnation`for''your Lot;#7;;.located on . ',the east side of-Lind Avenue .`in-the-City,of Renton, Washington. Specifically, this.: r:.lette is-intended to;review,the history of the site to answer:question's raised by City of '- ;- 'i`. - _Renton"in your letter to project engineer Bart Treece, dated"October 23';,•1997.,-Your I letter states'th'at;.previous work conducted on:the.site by David,Evans,"&.Associate's as ,;.'" well,as the City's;wetland-inventory identified'wetlands on the site,; .I have:reviewed. the available information and have concluded that there is no solid evidence'that.any wetlands existed On this:site following the;filling'of the site''in the 197('s._ The following information is provided as a basis:for rthis conclusion: t... ,: According;to the Soil Survey.for Xing-County Area, Washington (Snyder et at.),73) ,_the,.entire;site_.is mapped as:containing Snohomish series (So)'soils Snohomish-soils '` " are a poorly`drained silt-loam;formed alluvium,and are considered hydric'soils according,to:the publication'H dric''Soils ol the United-State.('USDA''NTCHS Pub No.1491,:1991) ,'However,the entire;:site was'filled in l974, burying the mapped'. " Snohomish.series under gravelly fill. Additional fill'was placed on the site'in1982/83 :by the owner at that time (Burlington,Northern Railrod) Our soil pits excavated throughout:the;site reveal;gravelly fill"imaterial:with various colors and textures r ' Review of Terra'Associates, Inc.,Geotechnical report prep ared for the site dated 2- - I 9=96 indicates'that there is approximately 5:feet of.Compacted reloaded )=fill"material "-over-the,native-soils. The Terra report also tridicates that.the;groundwater level on'the. site'was generally:at.a depth of7 feet below existing grades.; , Powell Lot#7/Job#96-`174 ,` r' •B-twelve Associate's,Inc,;` "r November_12, 1997 :. Page _ ! ` `1 Data collection'for`the•'Kin Count 'Soi_l Surve :conducted between 1' --1 g. y Y wast 966 969: � , The Survey,states that the mapping and documentation represents'conditions in 1969: ' ,I SnIce'the,filling•took'place:after":1969, this`unit,offll missed being:.mapped'as Urban.-`• • ' ' ;, soils'(Ur) by the Soil•Conser'vationService: Urban soils;are not,considered hydric soils.,. • • ' Additionally, a recent interpretation by the'_US Army Corps';of Engineers in 1995•'has • 1 ' resulted in the; rps Co not regulating wetlands that have emerged on legally placed .; compact fill material-in the' .valley. : •' I •D'avid,Evans &;Asociates,.Inc:•(DEA) conducted wetland,studies.of.the site'and,its • ; - • , vicinity in November`of,1991. The results•of their findings are described:in a_report .. . _ 'entitled,,Wetland Determination-'on the Pace'Property, Renton Washington (David: : Evans:&,Associates,` Inc:) dated December•18',.-1991:: This report Was.written ' , - ' • specifically`for,theidevelopment of the Pace Membership-Warehouse but also included .• ;delineation on Lot #7.as depicted on DEA's plans included with this:report. As . ' - 1 ` , described in'DEA's report,: "the.site has.been filled about 18 years,_ago and now , supports predominantly-grasses and:other weedy and-invasive,emergent,,vegetation",.' DEA investigated-the site'on November 15,!199:1: :The species:•of "vegetation thatDEA 'observed in'the areas they"called.wetlands are generally facultative and are commonly ,:found in compact,soils, tire ruts and'disturbed:sites Most of these species can become • • established in a%matter of months in;disturbed soils and often only:indicate the,most , • - recent soil moisture condition, not necessarily longterm conditions: • " According to.Table 2;.,in.the DEA.report:text, hydrologyindicators that were.evidenced in,data plots were all "assumed'-'or"absent". DEA's Table 2 vindicates that-no direct:' • observations of wetland,hydrology.,were evident during the site visit: This-conflicts; , with,some of the data sheets in,the report that indicate-some standing water was present 'in.some'areas However,'there is no map to indicate where these observations'were I.. made or what:delineated.area they were taken in'. ' In 'mostof'western Washington at low:elevations;such,as the the-general rule that the growing.season i`- • in wetland h drolo determinations(WA Dept of- : ' ;(March_1-October,31,) is used:' y g`y' p ', ',.Ecology, 1997). Observations after."October 31•,"such as•DEA`observed for;their";, •, delineations, are,not considered',accurate indicators of wetland hydrology'during,the `` ;:` growing'season. In'summary, there is Soil,Suivey:evidence,that wetlands may have existed on-the site ' r prior to placement of fill in '1974:-.In 1974 the_site was filled with approximately,5:feet'•,,J' , • of fill for the.purpose of preload in creating a commercial/light industrial.building site.' • - It.can.be safelyassumed that lacement of this fill"eliminated the'previousl exiting 'wetlands and isolated'any underlying wetland'hydrology and.soils from re-emerging on. the,surface'. .This area has.been;regularly:maintained-through_mowing:for the purpose :' (of keeping tWe site in-a condition,conducive to marketability: In'1991, a delineation of- : -• . + '' Powell Lot . - ' •• l'� _ '`B-twelve-Associatesi.:Inc:.. . : -• ; - November 12, 190. _ '• Page.3' ;. wetland.ve etation:and`possibly' some;h- drology was conducted by DEA in the non- growing season:.This delineation was transferred to the City-Of-Renton,Wetland` ;' 'Inventor ,Maps s following ermitin a roval of the Pace ro ect; �Since'evidence of.- t ., Y P following g PP , ,.• � p � � •- wetland:hydrology;has not_been';verified in'the.growing season this essentially was a 'one-parameter (plants) 'delineation: As'a`result,-I feel that there is'no.verifiable - evidence that"any areas„that could be`identified as wetlands have existed�on,the'.site since.fillip in 1974: :Y` ',,` g During my visits.to the,site.in,the last'two years,;I have-found-,the'site'to.be sparsly -Vegeta ed with,`invasive,weeds such as cat',s:ear-,(Hypochaeris,radicata), tansy ±, (Tanacetum vulgate) and,some cottonwood.(Populus b'alsamifera)seedlings and comprised entirely of gravelly-,fill,material•.;:'No areas of.wetland;soil, `vegetation or:,' = ` s • - • hydrology were observed on the However,_a wetland.:mitigatiori'project'located-:, - . • • behind•Home Base is located along the east 70 feet of the site: A vegetated,berm'' , - defines the west edge of-this protected sensitive area.. ',This was''.theonly,jurisdictional. ,.; area:of wetland found Op or near the site ' ' ' •�.: ' :If you have any:'questions or.require-additional-•information•please feel free'to contact , ,pie.at (253),859-0515.' Sincerely; B=twelve'Associates,.'Inc,:. Ed Sewall: 'Senior Wetland Ecologist; ; File:Eaiv6i�4-4 do`c; - CC: Peter Powell : . Bart Treece'- r.F . H r: • ,'. - it I ', :� •z - .,I :I ` 1 - • r r r • EN a: ;` liI.Nil.... ......... .......................:................ ......................::........... ........................:.:.............. ....RTON._:.:.:......:::::.:::.::>::::.;:::.::...:.....:::.�:..�:.:�:.:...:...:.:...::::.::.:.:.....:,:;.:.�:...:::::;::..... ::::;::E:;,,O PM EN > ;::;:.,.>:.;I CE:>:,.;:::::_::::.:::: ::..; :B: >«' o s> ai ;;:m`' '<>''< a 7.` ;:>: • ......................:...:::......... Note if:there:s>more;than::one>egal,ownar�:please attach;an additional. rrota�izeif.MasterApplic......tforeachp:wner PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: • • . UNIFIRST DEjVe4,9Piv1v./Ni POWELL-ORILLA ASSOCIATES PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: • ADDRESS: 'N pt. Lot 7, BNBSP 737 Market Street Lind Avenue, 500 ft. south of, SW 34th fast otc-L M Ave, e+tikin 5vv KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): CITY: Kirkland ZIP: 98033 125360-0060-06 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): (425) 828-4444 Vacant ;:L1<.:A..;T`(i f othe ><t���a ` ti nTer�< > « >' C..�.N. (iothe..:�..hart:::....:...:.:.:e.:.?..�:::::::::.:::.::::.: O. PROPOSED LAND USES: • • NAME: Commercial laundry facility for UniFirst Gary A. Bigelow COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP:DESIGNATION: I ' UniFirst Corporation Employment Area — Valley ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE:PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): 1454 Kittrell Road CITY: - ZIP: • EXISTING ZONING: Franklin, TN 37064 Medium Industrial (IM) . • TELEPHONE NUMBER: • ,(615) 791-6984 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): • • • G O N A ::::::<;::::<::<:::>: :;:<::<::::::>:::::: ............:....................:::....:..:.::.:NTAT;PAR �.: . SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): RFCE VED NAME: 4.4 acres Barton G. Treece, Jr. , P.E. 00T 1 1997 PROJECT VALUE: COMPANY(if applicable): DEVELOPMENT PLANNING TREECE & COMPANY $2,500,000.00 . CITY OFRENTON ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? 320 Second Avenue S. , #200 No CITY: ZIP: Kirkland 98033 • IS THE SITE LOCATED'IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 822-2577 • No ce..ssar. : :`i€i >;is'::'. €€'>€'>€€i:<'.>s:>::::><> :::::::::::::.:.........:LEGAL::DES.CRIF..>_ =:N::.O.:::::..:..O.PERT.Y.. Attach..se ar ,,._ she::et: ..................:.:::::....:.Y:I>;>;:.:..�::::::.�:::::::::::::::.::::::: • 7 N7: -rf a`t e 1. • • • >I E;:.::;:; < >> >>'>'>'>`'''" <»' «>><> >><> < <> » >> I .: r.. I .. , . . :>: Il<: ll: . :e �:: ha ; 1. .;�:�..��•r. '. :�;: . a.ff..w I..de e m n. ...fe.es�:>>><:>:>>:>�:>:>:<::>: ..............: » :<:>::»>::><::::>::::<::::::::::::>:<<:<;;>::::::;:::>::>:: '' e.ck..a a lo:n ::t �t. ...st. ............I...........t...............e.... ............................... .,.. :::::::.�:::.�:::.�:::::::.:�:.�::::::.�:::::�.h..... ..........:..:::RP:.�c.a:t:::::::::::.Y.p: st. :::tEpp:Y.:::: : ..Y....................................................................................................:.�.:::::�:::.:r:.: _ANNEXATION $ • SUBDIVISION: • _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ • _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ — SHORT PLAT $ x TEMPORARY PERMIT $ —TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ — SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ — GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ • MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN $...,. _: ; .: . • . , -.. . S_HORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $. • -'- -- - - — CONDITIONAL USE $ . . _VARIANCE 5'... . ' ' _ EXEMPTION $No Charge _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION S ::>::>;>:>:>:.»»»>>:<:<:>:<:<:<::>:»:;:>::<»:>;::::<:»:;;:<:::::;:>:<;::::«<:>::>:<;:::<:>::>:;:;::>::»>::»>::>:::>:<::;:. `�FFXDA. .fT..O.t=..01N.N RS . Jr. I, (Print Name)Barton G. Treece,,declare that I am(please check'one) - the owner o ;- . r„,,; ti-;0 W;,_<i, irrthiZapi .c.ka 'J> Xithe authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), "T;•d that the fffa9p1ng,staternents and a i.wers herein • contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the b'. of my I }ate e,and-bslief:: t;' MICHAP:I C 1.01!::i:e.;--k,... My appointment ;:. .• . . • . ' ATTEST: Subscrib- ;:'"Y*:w`' fse• iritie;"a•-M1lvt'a ,r1iii; ic, in and Barton G. Treece, Jr. — TREECE & COMPANY; for the State of W! . residing at (Na,'e of Ow er/Representative) � d.(:��-� , on the% day of .,�,y' f� ."'r., 19 •7 ignature of Owner/Represe ative) /°-jr._� • i v (Signature of Notary Public) • : i; is ' :iii:iii>:1:i; :C ... s se o.. �:� t t I f ::. :.::.:. :.:::. ;. ;::F Ie:::N ......Eie...:>:;;::::4.:........ j.; ;;:.:. .;::: - ::::C:U:::::LLA <:PF:<::FP > >:>P> < P�> RVMR0:V' ` *i> < .................................................:.....�:.:.::...AA ......W............ .......... .........SM...E.....(VI.NP........5 ....... ......C...A................................. ................................... :::,;. ...: .:::.::.:...®:;: '`:I'O.STAGE>PRO.VIp,ED: >;$ `�';"6› > :::::.';. :....;:. >:::;:T:OTAfEE.S,.>.;$r,� f /��.i .., : MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96 1 ( 11 'OWELL DEVELOPMENT CO 737 Market Street Kirkland,WA 98033 (206)828-4444 FAX(206)822-8297 October 14, 1996 Bait Treece HORTON DENNIS & ASSOCIATES 320 Second Ave. So. Kirkland,WA 98033 RE: LOT 8/LOT 7 -ORILLIA RENTON,WA Dear Bart: This letter will act as confirmation that you are authorized by the owner, Powell-Orillia Associates, to sign on our behalf in the matters of application or SEPA review and permits. Should any of the agencies of the City of Renton, King County, or the State of Washington have any questions,they can reach me at 828-4444. „, vvv. , eer W. Powell President jgt I . LEGAL DESCRIPTION UNIFIRST SITE-RENTON, WASHINTON A portion of Southwest quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., described as follows: The North 534 feet of Lot 7 of Burlington Northern Binding Site Plan.(BSP-014-92), per map recorded in Volume 161 of Plats, pages 8 through,11, inclusive, under Recording No. 920630296, Records of King County, Washington. - Tax Assessor No. 125360-0060-06 PROJECT NARRATIVE POWELL SHORT PLAT OF LOT 7, BNBSP RENTON, WASHINGTON Powell-Orilla Associates is proposing a three lot short plat of the existing Lot 7, Burlington Northern Binding Site Plan. The property is located on Lind Avenue SW approximately 500 feet south of SW 34th Street. The property is adjacent and bounded by the U.S. Rentals and Far West Steel sites on the north, HomeBase and Act III Theater sites on the east, and the Corporate Express Headquarters on the south. Separating the proposed Lots 1 and 2 is a 30-foot access easement connecting the Act III Theater site to Lind Avenue across from it's intersection with SW 39th Street. The purpose of this short plat is to create a site for the UniFirst development -to be located on the proposed Lot 3. At this time,there is no development anticipated for the proposed Lots 1 and 2. The proposed Lot 3, for UniFirst Corporation, is to be developed into a 46,000 square foot laundry facility and office. Please see"Project Narrative -UniFirst Corporation". Prior to any development on the proposed Lots 1 and 2, the normal Site Plan and Environmental Approval documents will be prepared and submitted. We believe that the above information is consistent with the submittal requirements for a Short Plat for the proposed three lots. More detailed information for the proposal for Lot 3 is enclosed. i - .ECEV D OCT 21 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING I _ CITY OF RENTON t. PROJECT NARRATIVE POWELL SHORT PLAT OF LOT 7 BNBSP UNIFIRST CORPORATION FACILITY Powell-Orilla&Associates, in conjunction with a pending sale to UniFirst Corporation, is proposing a three lot short plat of the existing Lot 7,Burlington Northern Binding Site Plan. This short plat will create a legal lot for the purchase by UniFirst as well as subdivide the southerly portion of the existing Lot 7 at the centerline of the Act III/Lind Avenue access drive. Please note, all proposed lots are greater than the required 35,000 square feet, the site is currently vacant, no existing improvements or special site features exist and utility services are available in Lind Avenue as well as within the Act m access easement. The only development proposal associated with this short plat at this time is the UniFirst Corporation development of a commercial laundry facility on proposed Lot 3. Future developments of Lots 1 and 2 would entail submission of site plan and environmental approval documentation with the specific proposals addressed at that time. The UniFirst development on Lot 3 will consist of a 6,000 square foot office area and a 40,000 square foot plant facility for commercial laundry processing. The proposed Lot 3 is 192,561 square feet and is located immediately west of the HomeBase development and south of the U.S. Rentals project. The exterior building materials will be painted concrete tilt wall, split rib block, glass and stucco. The maximum roof height anticipated is approximately 25 feet above finished grade. Upon completion,the facility will employ approximately 40 people, the majority of which will work during normal business hours. Initially, there will be six delivery/pick-up routes, the driver's for which generally leave the facility around 6:00 a.m. and return between 3:00 and 4:00 p.m. During the pre-application meetings, several points were discussed with City of Renton staff concerning utilities and operational issues. We address these comments as follows: Fire Prevention: Our preliminary design indicates a looped fire main with three fire hydrants. The building will be sprinklered for fire protection. A list of flammable and/or combustible liquids and chemicals utilized in the cleaning operation will be provided to the Fire Marshall. Water: Please reference comments on fire prevention above for looped water system description. There is an existing fire hydrant in the northwest corner of the property along Lind Avenue. Additionally, three hydrants are to be installed with construction. Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer service will be provided to an existing sanitary sewer stub- out in Lind Avenue. This facility will treat all discharge from the laundry processing facility and a sewer quality monitoring station will be installed as a part of site construction. Anticipated flows from this building are in the neighborhood of 60,000 gallons per day. Please note we call for sprinkler systems to be tight-lined to the sanitary sewer system, and a backflow device called for at the connection point. RECEIVED OCT 21 1997 bt5:966405.nar 1 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Storm Water: We are including a preliminary storm drainage report which addresses the requirements per the King County Surface Water Manual. Due to site configuration, we have elected to use two detention facillities connecting to two separate storm water stubs at Lind Avenue. In so doing, the storm water collected from parking areas is less than one acre for each facility, hence, simplifying the construction and installation. Revisions to existing storm water facillities on HomeBase is not anticipated. Traffic: Based upon the anticipated number of employees and trips, as well as the ITE data for Light Industrial facillities(the most similar use studied in ITE), trip generations will be as shown in the report prepared by The Transpo Group dated October 13, 1997. Parking: Calculation of maximum and minimum parking ratios yield the following: Maximum: 1.5/1,000 sfx 43,680 = 65.5 4.5/1,000 sfx 6,000 = 27.0 92.5 Minimum: 1/1,000 sfx 43,680 = 43.7 3/1,000 sfx 6,000 = 18.0 61.7 The proposal of 82 spaces falls within this range. During the review and approval process (short plat, site plan, and SEPA), billing preload plan and application will be prepared and submitted for review and approvals. It is our intent to place a building preload after the SEPA appeal period and in the ensuing 8 to 10 weeks prepare, submit and receive necessary approvals and permits for foundation, building and site construction. We believe the information furnished is consistent with the submittal requirements for the requested permits and reviews. bt5:966405.nar 2 CONSTRUCTION MITIGATION DESCRIPTION UNIFIRST SITE -RENTON, WASHINGTON With an October 7, 1997 submittal of the SEPA and site plan approval documents, we would anticipate submitting plans and applications for a Building Preload Permit on or about November 15, 1997. We anticipate approvals and issuance of this permit concurrent with the expiration of the SEPA comment period,which is estimated to be the first week in December. At that time, placement of preload materials will commence and, in the ensuing 8 to 10 weeks, final construction plans for foundations, building and site construction will be submitted and approvals received during the last week in January. At that time, excess preload material will be removed from the building area, spread on site as site fill and construction of foundation and site improvements commenced. It is anticipated that from this time, approximately six weeks will be necessary to complete site construction (depending, of course, on weather conditions) with a completion of all construction efforts and opening of this facility for business mid Summer 1998. It is envisioned that construction, once begun, will be performed between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. - or other hours as specified by City of Renton ordinances, six days per week. As with other facilities in the area either recently completed or under construction at this time, it is anticipated that the hauling and transportation routes will utilize the Valley Freeway/41 st Street/Lind Avenue routes into the site and SW 34th/East Valley Road/Valley Freeway exits. During construction, minimization of dust, mud, noise and other noxious characteristics will be accomplished by the appropriate methods of sprinkling, washing wheels, street sweeping, all equipment is muffled and construction will proceed as expeditiously as possible so as to minimize the overall time frame. Transportation and traffic impacts are anticipated to be similar to impacts of nearby previously constructed sites. As always, the owners, contractors and the engineer will work closely with City of Renton staff and building inspectors to address any anticipated problems in a speedy and efficient manner. FIECENED OCT 21 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON bt5:966405.mit dpj TREECE & COMPANY ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 320 2nd Ave South, Suite 200, Kirkland,Washington 98033 Phone(206)822-2577 Fax(206)822-8758 October 16, 1997 ECEIVF Mr. Peter Rosen, Associate; Planner Development Services Division OCT 2 i 1997 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S. CEVELOrrvi (dT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98055 RE: UNIFIRST CORPORATION DEVELOPMENT/POWELL SHORT PLAT (PRE-APP FILE NO. 9767) Dear Peter: Attached please find our application materials in support of this request for a three lot short plat approval (Powell short plat), SEPA Environmental Review, and Site Plan Review for the UniFirst development. As with previous combined applications, we have submitted the greatest number of copies of documents as delineated in the submittal requirements for the three approvals sought. Since the pre-application meeting, one significant change has been accomplished -we have moved the UniFirst site westward (toward Lind Avenue) so that there will be no relocation or modification to the existing HomeBase detention facility. We believe that we have addressed comments from the pre-application that are applicable to these applications as submitted. As there is no current development proposal for the future Lots 1 and 2, any roadway frontage improvements that may be required of this short plat application are respectfully requested to be waived until such a time a development proposal is begun. We will, of course, install frontage improvements along Lind Avenue along the UniFirst development area. Peter,we appreciate your assistance. Please call should you need additional information or have any questions. Best regards, TREECE& COMPANY. 4 Barton G. Treece, Jr., P.E. BGT:vg:rosen.o15 Enclosures cc: Powell Development Corp. UniFirst Corporation Transportation and Traffic Engineering PLANNING • DESIGN The Transpo Group October 14, 1997 TG: 97339.00 Mr. Bart Treece Treece &Company 320 2nd Avenue S, Suite 200 Kirkland, WA 98033 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC-RELATED ISSUES FOR THE RENTON LAUNDRY FACILITY Dear Bart, This letter presents the traffic-related issues for the proposed laundry facility located on Lind Ave SW in Renton, Washington. We understand that the City of Renton is requiring trip generation and distribution estimates for this project. This letter discusses each of these in more detail next. Project Description The proposed laundry facility would be located on property adjacent to Lind Ave SW between SW 34th Street and SW 41a°Street, in the East Valley.area•immediately west of the Home Base store. The building would include a commercial laundry facility,containing 40,000 square feet (sf) of operating space, and 6,000 square feet (sf) of office space. The entire facility would employ approximately 40 people. The owner of the proposed facility anticipates using up to 6 delivery vehicles, operating between the hours of 4:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on weekdays. Access to and from the site would be provided via two proposed driveways on Lind Avenue SW. Trip Generation • Trip generation estimates are typically based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition, 1991.. However, no specific trip generation data is available in the Trip Generation Manual for this type of facility. For purposes of estimating trip generation for the proposed commercial laundry facility, the most similar use in ITE's Trip Generation Manual is Land Use Code 110, Light Industrial space. Since the proposed commercial laundry facility operates most similarly to Light Industrial facilities, the trip generation was estimated using the trip rate for this land use, which is 3.02 daily trips/employee. Based on the anticipated 40 employees, 121 daily trips were estimated to be generated by employee trips to and from the proposed facility. The site also anticipates a generation of 12 trips per day by the 6 delivery vehicles: specifically 6 outbound trips would occur in the morning, between the hours of 4:00 and 6:00 a.m., and 6 inbound trips in the afternoon, between 2:00 and 4:00 p.m. Thus, this site is estimatVg. .orate a total of 133 trips per day. OCT 2 1 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON The TRANSPO Group,Inc. 14335 N.E.24th Street,Suite 201 Bellevue,Washington 98007-3737 FAX:425/747-3688 425/641-3881 Mr. Bart Treece The October 14, 1997 Transpo Page 2 Group During the PM peak hour of the adjacent street, which will occur between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m., approximately 17 trips would be generated by the site (2 in, 15 out), based on a PM peak hour trip rate of 0.42 trips per employee. Trip Distribution The distribution of trips to and from the proposed commercial laundry facility would occur primarily to and from SR 167. Trips from SR 167 would likely travel westbound on SW 41st Street and northbound on Lind Avenue SW to the site. Trips to SR 167 from the site would likely travel eastbound on SW 34th Street and southbound on E Valley Road to SR 167. As a result, few site trips would impact the Lind Avenue SW/SW 34th Street intersection. Please give me a call at 641-3881 if you have any questions. Sincerely, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. Ilf/1\ ,141p4M Jeff L. Schramm Transportation Engineer JLS/cjb M:\97\97339\W P\TRI PGEN.DOC .SI O.:::. > >>> >< >`: <> s>`>> <1<'<;`> > <>< •.•• .•••:: :. :: :::•DEVELOPMENT.SERV( .......::...:.......,..,,...,,,,,:.;,.::::::..::::::::.:::::: ::::.:::.. TI:ON :SIGN STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) �!�'4 - ice.,g,ee , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: Ctl 1. On the 6 414 day of (ram kJ, , 1917 , I installed l public information sign(s) of the property located at Z/44/, 1 ee, SJL/ IS OA $!r! 17' 6i for the following project: 00(WieG! d i°1 ewto Project name 4 Owner Name 2. This/these public information si n(s) was/were constructed and installed in locations in.conformance with the requir e is of Renton Municipal Sections 9-12-8 G and 9-12-9-I 2a. Afflant SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 10 day of QC.T0 eTt— , 19 . NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON L, MICHAEL G.MICKIEWICZ A.w��✓( '�✓'^ My appointment Expires June 11,z000 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, R residing at 3oTK�tr My commission expires on ju,ue. 1.(, 2 arPor ccivsn PUBSIONS.DOC �p REV.9l9621 1�, @ CPLikti11114G O.t9//'7. 4I OCT-16-1997 23:37 PRO" 912 ASSOCIATES TO 14255226753 ?.02 ... 1 I ,! il,;irlrtln: - *N..., /` B-twelve Associates, Inc. ..2. . - - -- -- - - - ;:::,t .1'•an..,'jF-:6' - 1103 W. Meeker St. (v)253-859-0515 "1'-•.I Suite C (f).253-852-4732 +" Kent,WA93042-5751 (e)bl2assvc@compuserve.com • - : •October 17,,1997 :. Mr. Peter'Powell •• • . •• •- ; Powell Development Company .`737 Market Street . ., : . . . • Kirkland, Washington 98033 • • RE: Powell Short Plat Lot#7-Wetland Determination - B-twelve Job#96-174 • , . - . •. Dear.Peter, This letter describes my findings in regards to jurisdictional wetlands on your property - - . . . known as Lot#7, located on the east side of Lind Avenue, in the City of Renton, . ' Washington.. I.inspected the site.ori•October 1, 1997. .I,had also inspected the,north half of the'site in December of 1996. A combination of field indicators (including vegetation, soils, and hydrology) are used to determine the presence of a jurisdictional 'wetland.' •Soil colon are•idetitified using the 1990 Edited and Revised edition of the .Munsell Soil_Color its (Kollmorgen Instruments Corp. 1990). The site was inspected using the.methodology described in the Corps of Engineers W tlandc 'ne • n u (Dept. of the Army, 1987). This is.the methodology recognized by the US.,Army Corps of Engineers and the.City of Renton for wetland determinations and delineations at the time of our field,work. ,. I found the site to be sparsly vegetated with invasive weeds such as cat's ear ..(Hypochaeris radicata), tansy (Tanacesum vulgare) and some cottonwood (Popzdus balsamfera) seedlings and comprised entirely of gravelly fill material. No areas of . wetland soil, vegetation or hydrology were observed on the site. However, a'wetlaand • mitigation project located behind Home Base is located along the east 70 feet of the • site. 'A vegetated berm defines the west edge of this protecteed sensitive area. 'This was the only jurisdictional area of wetland found on or near the site. . RECEIVED . OCT 21 1997 • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON -_ OCT-16-1997 23:38 FRONT 812 ASSOCIATES TO 14258228759 P.03 Powell Loc#71Job#96-174 B-twelve Associates,Inc. October 17, 1997 Page 2 _ If you have any questions or require additional information please feel free to contact me at(253) 859-0515. ' Sincerely, • B-twelve Associates, Inc. • ]Ed Sewall .: • Senior Wetland Ecologist • • . File:ff4J%I74-0J.doc • • • • • • • • TOTAL P.03 AI 'j ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making.decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: • This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basis information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. • You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know"or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals,even though questions may be answered"does not apply." IN ADDITION,complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For project actions,the references in the checklist to the words"project,""applicant,"and"property or site" should be read as"proposal,""proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: UniFirst,Renton, Washington , 2. Name of applicant: Qv,,NN�NG Barton G. Treece,Jr.,P.E. v G o ove for Powell-Orilla(property owner) bt5:966405.ec 1 of 15 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Contact: Barton G. Treece,Jr.,P.E. Treece&Company 320 Second Avenue S., #200 Kirkland, WA 98033 - (206)822-2577 4. Date checklist prepared: September 22, 1997 5. Agency requesting checklist: Planning/Building/Public Works, City ofRenton 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable): Construction commencing February 1998 with completion scheduled for August 1998. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,explain. Short Plat of Lot 7, BNBSP to create this site is being submitted concurrently. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. Site reconnaissance by B-Twelve and Associates(copy Of report attached). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain: Short Plat of Lot 7,BNBSP to create this site is being submitted concurrently. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. City ofRenton-SEPA,site plan approval, 3 lot short plat, building pre-load permit, grading and building permits: 11. Give brief,complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Construction ofa 46,000 square foot commercial laundry facility on a 4.4 acre site with parking stalls and related site civil and landscaping improvements(see attached project narrative). bt5:966405.ec 2 of 15 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any,and section,township, and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Located in the southern portion of Renton in the Green River Valley; Burlington Northern Binding Site Plan,Lot 7. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site(underline one): Flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1%maximum c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay,sand,gravel,peat,muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. A soils report is provided as an attachment to this checklist. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,describe. No. e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 10,000± cubic yards of fill material to be imported to the site from local borrow pits. bt5:966405.ec 3 of 15 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,generally describe. Yes, soil erosion could occur in connection with the proposed development since the entire site would be stripped ofvegetation. Even though the site is flat, erosion could occur during rain and/or wind storms that occur during the construction phase of the project. To minimize this potential for soil erosion, site preparation techniques would include temporary detention ponds and filter fences to reduce the impact of water runoff on the surface soil. Landscaping will be placed on all surfaces not covered with impervious materials. No significant erosion is expected following project completion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces'after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 60%coverage. Total Site Area: 191,706 sf Building Area: 46,000 sf Paving Area: 69,024 sf h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,if any: Erosion and sedimentation controls such as interceptor swales, straw bale barriers, silt fences and straw mulch for temporary erosion protection of exposed soils should be applied during. construction. Stabilized construction entrances and wash pads should be installed at the beginning of construction and maintained for the duration of the project. All erosion and sedimentation control measures shall be installed and maintained in accordance with City of Renton requirements. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile,odors,industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Development of the site, as proposed, would not result in any significant impacts to existing air quality. The primary impact from development of the proposed project are related to construction activities and future vehicle traffic. Dust generated from grading and construction vehicle activity would be a temporary nuisance in the general area. bt5:966405.ec 4 of.15 b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so,generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: Transport of materials on local streets should be controlled to minimize congestion during peak travel times. This would minimize secondary air quality impacts caused by reduced travel • speeds. Dust produced by construction can be reduced by using a number of techniques. Areas of exposed soils such as storage yards, could be sprayed with water, oils, or chemical dust suppressants. Areas,that might be exposed for prolonged periods of time should be covered with suitable ground cover to prevent wind erosion. Soils carried out of the construction area by trucks could be minimized by use of a rock mat as a transition zone from the construction site; wheel washing; washing or brushing truck undercarriages; and covering dusty truck loads. For soils that do escape the construction site on trucks, a daily street cleaning program for truck routes would help to minimize dust. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to. (within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. No. • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. . Does not apply. • bt5:966405.ec 5 of 15 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. The proposed project will not require the withdrawal of surface water. However, surface water drainage will be conveyed to the storm drain system in Lind Avenue SW, west of the project site. Surface water runoff will be directed to an onsite water quality and detention facility. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note location on the site plan. No. According to the City of Renton Community Profile, 1989, the site of the proposed project is not within either the 100-year floodplain orfloodway. The FEMA flood plain maps for the City of Renton depict the project site as being outside the 100-year floodplain as well. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, all waste material from the site would enter the city's storm drain or sanitary sewer collection system. Based on the preliminary grading and utility plans for the project, all surface water runoff would be collected from paved areas and roof tops by storm drains and directed to an onsite water quality facility. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ...agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. Does not apply. • • bt5:966405.ec 6 of 15 c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal,if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. Future construction of buildings and site improvements would cover up to 60%of the site with impervious surfaces. This would result in storm water runoff that would drain to the Springbrook Creek, which flows back into the Black River. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Surface water could be contaminated by runoff containing oil or gas from parked cars on the parking lot and streets servicing the proposal. However,surface water runoff will be directed into an on-site water quality facility. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: On-site storm drainage and water quality/detention capabilities. 4. PLANTS a. Check or underline types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other evergreen tree:fir,cedar,pine,other: Hemlock shrubs, X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants:cattail,buttercup,bulrush,skunk cabbage, other • water plants:water lily,eelgrass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation* Logging Slash • b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All of the grasses and weeds on site would be removed during the grading phase of construction. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. bt5:966405.ec 7 of 15 d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: All new landscaping and irrigation systems would be installed per the requirements of the City of Renton's landscaping ordinance. 5. ANIMALS a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds:hawk,heron,eagle,songbirds,other: crows&seagulls mammals:deer,bear,elk,beaver,other: rodents fish: bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. Not to our knowledge. d. . Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: None proposed. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric,natural gas, oil,wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. Electricity-Power HVAC,Lighting Natural Gas-Heating b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. No. • c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: For the UniFirst facility,energy conservation would consist of an insulated building envelope,HVAC with heat recovery features, automatic energy management systems, energy efficient light bt5:966405.ec 8 of 15 • fixtures. The State of Washington has adopted model conservation standards for new commercial buildings, and as the City of Renton has adopted these standards, this development would be consistent with these model standards. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? • If so,describe. None to our knowledge. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire, Police and Ambulance services consistent with similar residential areas. No special services are required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: None required b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:traffic,equipment,operation,other)? Traffic from SR 167 and local arterial(s)can be heard from the site, but would not affect the proposal. 2) What types of levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate - what hours noise would come.from the site. Short Term-Construction related(6 months) 7 a.m. to 7p.m. Long Term-Normal commercial traffic associated with a laundry facility; daily 4:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., 5 days a week 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Mufflers on construction equipment during the construction period. • bt5:966405.ec 9 of 15 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant. Adjacent site is a HomeBase Warehouse store and U.S.Rentals facility;surrounding sites are commercial and office uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. • d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? I111 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? IIII g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project. 40 employees would work in the completed project. • j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. bt5:966405.ec 10 of 15 lc. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not Applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: The proposed project is a concrete tilt wall building that is. smaller in size, design and scale to the other industrial, warehouse, and commercial buildings in the vicinity of the site. The type of use proposed is also consistent with land uses adjacent to the site and in the surrounding area. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,middle,or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,middle,or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not Applicable. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? Maximum building height would be 24 feet at the roof ridge. Principle exterior material would be painted concrete tilt walls, glass and metal roof over the office area. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Appearance of the site would change from a vacant and undeveloped area to an urban use. Views from adjacent commercial and industrial uses toward the site would change from vacant fields to views of commercial uses with parking lots. bt5:966405.ec 11 of 15 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: A landscaping strip along the public right-of-way, interior parking lot landscaping, as required, and perimeter landscaping consisting of a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover are proposed 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce?What time of day would it mainly occur? Exterior lighting for the improvements resulting from the proposed development would consist of wall lighting,parking lot lighting,with non glare fixtures, and some signage. Any glare that may occur would happen at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No safety hazards from lighting would occur. The proposed landscaping along Lind Avenue could be designed to minimize glare from headlights on adjacent properties. . c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal: None to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: All outdoor lighting would be shielded and directed downward or upward so as to minimize potential intrusion on neighboring properties. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are , in the immediate vicinity. Act III Theater Complex on nearby site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,describe. No. bt5:966405.ec 12 of 15 ' c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national,state,or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. None to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: Not applicable. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. • The proposed project is located on a vacant site that fronts Lind Avenue 510±feet south of SW 34th Street. The East Valley Freeway(SR 167)parallels East Valley Road and is two blocks to the east..The closest freeway interchange is located at SW 41st Street where freeway southbound on- and off-ramps are available. Northbound on-and off-ramps for SR 167 are located at SW 43rd Street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? • The site is not currently serviced by public transit. Route 155, which provides service to and from the Southcenter shopping • mall, is the closest public transit line to the project site. The closest bus stop to the site is several blocks to the south at SW ' 43rd and East Valley Road. bt5:966405.ec 13 of 15 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 80±stalls,-none eliminated d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private). Sidewalks will be installed along the project frontage on Lind Avenue. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water,rail,or air transportation? If so,generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 80 employee trips and 20 delivery trips-generally 4-8 a.m. and 3-5 p.m.,please see enclosed report by the Transpo Group. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: Impact Fees. The City ofRenton has recently adopted an Impact Fee Program. As mitigation for a project's impact to the area transportation system, the City ofRenton requires an impact fee to help fund future capacity improvements within the city. Local Off-Site Improvements. No local off-site improvements are recommended. 'Since the project does not degrade the level of service at any study area intersection for 1996 conditions, specific roadway improvements are not required. Frontage Improvements. Sidewalks will be provided along Lind Avenue. Transportation Management. Sidewalks will be provided along Lind Avenue consistent with City of Renton requirements. bt5:966405.ec 14 of 15 e 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example:fire protection,police protection,health care,school,other)? If so,generally describe. No;however, the new development would require police and fire department services, as with similar type developments. The impact on schools and health services would be minimal since most new employees are expected to be hired from the local labor pool. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. Not applicable. 16. UTILITIES a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,water,refuse service,telephone,sanitary sewer, septic system,other. b. Describe 'the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Sewer: City of Renton Telephone: GTE Northwest Water: City of Renton Refuse Service: Waste Management • Power: Puget Sound Power and Light C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. l'ASIY.44/Signatur� Printed Name: Barton G. Treece,Jr.,P.E. Date Submitted:`p) ' bt5:966405.ec 15 of 15 CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE REPORT FOR COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY Prepared for: Treece &Company 320 Second Avenue South Suite 200 Kirkland, WA 98033 Prepared by: Peterson Consulting Engineers 320 Second Avenue South • Kirkland, WA 98033 F P� ®vo, 'A-Apt RECEIVED a a0r - • _ OCT 21 1997 041 41 ?p" �� �'f.' DEVELOPMENTPLANNING CITY OF REN ON LFXPIRES 6/7/9S 1 October 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROPOSED SITE CONSTRUCTION 1 II. EXISTING ON-SITE DRAINAGE FEATURES 1 III. DEVELOPED ON-SITE DRAINAGE FEATURES 1 IV. CORE REQUIREMENTS 6 A. Core Requirement#1: Discharge at the natural location 6 B. Core Requirement#2: Off-site analysis 6 C. Core Requirement#3: Runoff control 6 D. Core Requirement#4: Conveyance System 6 E. Core Requirement#5: Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan 6 V. DETENTION/RETENTION 7 VI. WATER QUALITY 7 VII. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 9 VIII. CONCLUSION 10 Conceptual Drainage for Commercial Laundry Facility October 1997 I. PROPOSED SITE CONSTRUCTION • The approximately 3.3 acre site (4.4 acres gross) is proposed to be a commercial laundry facility. The site is located within the incorporated City of Renton, within the 3400 block of Lind Avenue south of 34th Street SW (see Figure 1). More specifically, the site is located within the South half(S 1/2) of Section.30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Existing development adjacent to the site includes railroad tracks and U.S. Rentals, bounding the site to the north; Home Base retail store and a wetland and detention berm bounding the site to the east;_undeveloped land to the south; and Lind Avenue bounding the site to the west. Based on the results of an onsite detailed soil content analysis completed by Terra Associates, the site contains alluvium soils (Qaw). This soil type contains several layers of silty sand fill, and displays characteristics of moderately high runoff potential. The soil qualities closely resemble those defined as hydrologic soil class C per the King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM). Curve number calculations for the onsite hydrologic analysis are included in Appendix I. Other specific site details are outlined within the Technical Information Report Worksheet included as Figure 2. II. EXISTING ON-SITE DRAINAGE FEATURES The existing site contains sparse grasslands and relatively no vegetation. There are several small shrubs along the western boundary of the site. The onsite drainage patterns generally sheet flow from the east to the west at relatively • flat slopes (1% to 3%). There are no defined natural drainage swales running through the property. An analysis was completed utilizing the WaterWorks software to determine the existing and proposed runoff rates produced by the 2, 10 and 100 year, 24-hour storm event for the pre-developed conditions. All of the hydrologic parameters utilized in the calculations are included in Appendix I and the results summarized in Table 1. III. DEVELOPED ON-SITE DRAINAGE FEATURES The proposed site will consist of an approximately 0.93 acre commercial laundry facility, and a 0.15 acre commercial office area. Development of the site will also include parking/paved areas and landscaping. Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 1 D:DATA`PROJECTS TRF.00004 CLFIDOC I. N . C - 'ii._;�<.:.r" bra S' ' I N.r jl •- r• I'. �...6F� I Ki t, TI;i^-I- -" f �.�, a' ma's . i., `I •,,•I'e �I'~t, I I �,n,.,urs :It 51H•_ ST ,; 1 i I ._;.+ i. ?I�1 o .i•1, : >I :t• _ t— _ 'd IT r '•' <na!ir, <. �•it 8 1. / - ... - .. " i 2dr� = T la $ 1ZI�I <I,. I / I alb ,�� L S 4_.•" h' w1,:w Si (r 'H '7 47N l �: ST .�/! ,H .. qF e " ` '1� I • ,mil¢ '':.'il i/'r� ♦1 mi Ne c ` - 'RTOy afTr vro S I 7_ W `� / I Iaj I < -g;�t� . aW, .�.. `.° 9pI' _ ........ •h,r•.r�,.-- - ealc --- i �i s`; . ttnra _�_1`f_. Y! Ro ' QI ST *.r�-11 �::> ^ /y i s ° ;+ N S AIR ORTaTWY r 3�■ QI Y' ��rh� �' 1 e(IT I:3:• ' _ itaC ST h MV 2N0 § 5 1ILLIC••.5T s �'\I sr NE \\y h'f'Q ._ _ • - -"T 5 d TOBIN Tsillf fir•.`Q IS i — �� i�� ill �� `,.y. A,r✓ , _ s 3 VICTOR; o?e' r j�� '�,s (i • •�4TH - T I RENiDN _,,n P // \\ Yr ] JJ/d ��T ��_. Al. 3'• act. 18 I NS Z�n .1/ustar cEaR d' .JLE "- '� _, �0/� Ivy. , �4Ncyr•�. n •�_ S r 2ND ST '...���nnnww�y��, PARK ya. otter\'\ < °,T " $YE Nam,-,- V h • JI , 'j ;fir 900 7� 0; y N •'i a• \ "'I`:1 SuN � /� 2\ 5 RH <'�r5 .r I '�\•.g .F I .r �-� 5 'r ;�'c o,^ s'1n� c}...< \, 7C\s ,,,, S'US� W ^7 li: i ' .\gyp J\+S\ si'o, N, g •\ 1 1 n� SDI/ I ST1,1 s-is'i Bfi( ,. °cg li IT`S!STST 5,,�Ro pl ., ,—._u3RC ST :(i_ / g, Pi .are. 7is<I \f 6TH ST \ \•,-! -----,__9:`57 i ~I 5 r i s -• i•s 1<' N\ ~�1 _ , G 6Th l$T 6M�S7 I\ Ni u;,:',L• ° d •Lc 4P -- Si,g �. SW = 7TH yA / ST r �/ ;� I. 15 hTH .\ �a7ii. u _;�:.- .a.• `. <':--.1_4 ' •�^I<I' D s_a'Df ,c3/ , , 'L N 04 Si l '•> \.. JEs' • • �i I , I s,:''. W V En RCNTa vii r.c ,i, I I _. ,"„A TOLD ',4. ,tl 5 1 �i-i `• rARa . 5 fl W1 �. CfRTfR 'a; oIpAR. 9��\f I's • j'i• /`� - 151i! 11C1r5' T Gi Y fl i S RENTo VILUGE PL .� S t:•H S' `4`:(E • -110/ 'r • - z! II IN I r': \ ` l '''sr`' -. s , _�1E % " =' s Q>2 <1_::5- -- r _- � <;6 iI J - *5� ,'lyAe S �` aC. '. 1 .'' SR•- l6THl I ST �'J �"ISih z:,, e T_ ��.W �I I -.� �.f 5T6...71 o. s s__ j :6. 16TH ST\ ` �t, `g�l S 16TH ST '.t�04 _ , s oaSE'.t ` 1— -....-rUKN'U / �. •'i i i^ S .- \ u :e'•- n y FH1-CD, CH \ :1 ^. ' I `:j S TM R�'I sT she Ia<y` ,,,y iy4a •• B1.B • • -SW I9rH sr i ," �� Q "I o g o /J` 1 �\� 8 II MIS 19TH :IST I- 1 E'Rn! —�`, V �;'� G ru60/ h rr sT a ((f\ lml,_ �N �-I I 7oA / N7LL � Y-n o, ..., KWf(q. pKWY �nGa, • �Iti r ��i vwE+I iloy PUGET ''.,a.� u 57E!r.d<Nr; .. ,.. Ir ,1 LL„ ,►.� n a;Ay e:�_�u1-' g °w;1it�` �j sue! 4I ,c,�:.t si.31S' •II J- : ;EA, .. .c I N• m., I `,: ,r ;f"C r.15E Yi•o vl�a u ilsi n ilk, •!E= LHLS"' r'�. I;i'• •• I. SW 23RD ST 1 S 23R0 ST •L _.r_ '� 11 -a rusour NIT ^��f1 •- Ei ' s II.;Rig.J ',, it , � 1 1271N ST it - d,. +'" r 5"� S 27TH ST _ - S'. _ • -:c v,.... • •PECK ;hj., • al I ` >s�., 3. 'I '' r - SJJINCEN!- - ,T sS N�' ��` 1yy9��� ,�• l_ SEC' - i. 'I • 91 29TH ST .,177 •PM ,�,r,µ_ —1., ,. ` s,: :'i - fwargp : I / a 5 a\c iw c. ,.F s-i} �' 4 -I _ _ x '�I ?- _ _ Z P. 3'ti .. - f SW 30TH •I m " s `- _ - ¢$ m _.— ---_ • rs .. • - , ! s sSE 715i ST r, i a. .,.- _ a ' COpYcp it � • i ._ __ _ rn 3 ;e9 ��SC 169ih �" • : ' PROJECT SITE _ ..N H .: : :.? - 1 _ .. $Y _._.- .— w �....____. �_ S FS. -•E_Hy _ i.y sT CORPORA III I eI sT I o \ J . _ DR S .. , >.1 -� 1 16; II al 34TH ST 5 5' r. „'HE. sr SE i 'S' _H�_Ell e-vL ql S, I `I In i '< \`, < S: pAa.ur. ms__ WI SW.'38TH SW TN ST I ice, a' A A.•A a 1 ST _.._ \�V '-�v r`5! 7T7 5T 5 `� ., _ ;' Q� ¢ DR: .I SW _ 39 H ST,91 / Ti- 4' �SA,mN 7R 3- SN FIST ST - 'S- ' _ SCALE: 1" =2400' FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP Page 1 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET • PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT ENGINEER AND DESCRIPTION Project Owner .(/t l:Fc; T (OA-2i-)). 'f/7Aoki Project Name eaii:lee-bi -- f Address Location Phone Township Project Engineer /±' !f" :" Range '�Z 7-' y;�.ii Section Company 7?r"y"•. / Project Size AC Address Phone ?� 4 k , ' r.i ,ig.• 100 Upstream Drainage Basin Size AC PART 3 TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION PART 4 OTHER PERMITS I I Subdivision I I DOF/G HPA 0 Shoreline Management 1 Short Subdivision 0 COE 404 11 Rockery "K Grading 0 DOE Dam Safety I I Structural Vaults Commercial I I FEMA Floodplain I I Other I I Other I I COE Wetlands I I HPA • PART 5 .SITE COMMUNITY AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community ///,,''vr ' '' r'"�1 l? ",<-- /'A Drainage Basin PART 6 SITE CHARACTERISTICS I River I 1 Floodplain I-7 Stream liR' Wetlands I I Critical Stream Reach I I Seeps/Springs Depressions/Swales I High Groundwater Table I I Lake I I Groundwater Recharge CI Steep Slopes 0 Other 0 Lakeside/Erosion Hazard PART 7 SOILS Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities • I I Additional Sheets Attatched 1/90 FIGURE 2 Page 2 of 2 King County Building and Land Development Division TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET ART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT E Ch.4-Downstream Analysis a 0 a 0 I l • I J Additional Sheets Attatched PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION I I Sedimentation Facilities I I Stabilize Exposed Surface II Stabilized Construction Entrance I Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities Perimeter Runoff Control Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris I I Clearing and Grading Restrictions I I Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities 0 Cover Practices I 1 Flag Limits of NGPES I I Construction Sequence I I Other l 1 Other ' .•ART 10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM I 1 Grass Lined Channel I I Tank El Infiltration Method of Analysis 1 1 Pipe System 11 Vault 0 Depression 0 Open Channel I I Energy Dissapator CD Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation 1 I Dry Pond I I Wetland I I Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage Wet Pond I I Stream I I Regional Detention Brief Description of System Operation Facility Related Site Limitations I I Additional Sheets Attatched Reference Facility Limitation PART 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS (May require special structural review) I Drainage Easement O Cast in Place Vault 0 Other 1�Q Access Easement 0 Retaining Wall I 1 Native Growth Protection Easement I I Rockery>4'High I I Tract El Structural on Steep Slope I I Other •ART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site.Actual 1 site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the -S: attatchments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided �►_ _ here is accurate. Sign.dOS' 1/90 Conceptual Drainage SI___ ,or Commercial Laundry Facility October 1997 The onsite drainage will be divided into two hydrologic basins. The southern portion of the site will comprise onsite Basin ONDEV-A. Runoff generated within ON-DEVA will be routed to approximately the midpoint of the southern boundary of the site, into an onsite biofiltration swale and detention facility (see Figure 3). • The northern portion of the site(including roof drainage) comprises hydrologic basin ONDEV-B. Runoff generated within Basin ONDEV-B will be routed via the onsite parking to an additional biofiltration swale and detention basin located within the northern portion of the site. An onsite hydrologic analysis was completed for both of the onsite basins utilizing the WaterWorks software to determine the 2, 10 and 100-year, 24-hour flowrates generated by the post-developed conditions. The parameters and calculations are included Appendix I and the results of the calculations are included in Table 1. Both the northerly and the southerly detention basins will discharge into an existing 60-inch storm drain within Lind Road via two existing storm drain stubs coming in to the proposed site. A detailed discussion of the proposed storm drain system is discussed in the section within this report entitled "offsite analysis." Two on-site storm detention facilities will be provided, as discussed in the previous section, to limit the on-site runoff to quantities defined by the existing drainage condition hydrologic analysis. To provide for water quality treatment, runoff from paved and landscaped areas will be collected and conveyed within a biofiltration swale located prior to the detention facility(see Figure 3). TABLE 1 sown' Ho,riitc I'rcciltilaliim ( unlrihuiin� I i.ultin_ rcilucnc� \rc;i \ nlunic (do (in) (Acre.) (.Icrc-iI Pre Development asin ONEX-A • 2-year 0.16 1.95 0.78 0.06 10-year 0.32 2.85 0.78 0.11 100-year 0.51 3.90 0.78 0.17 Pre-Development (Basin ONEX-B) 2-year 0.53 1.95 2.52 0.20 10-year 1.03 2.85 2.52 0.36 100-year 1.65 3.90 2.52 0.55 Post-Development (Basin ONDEV-A) 2-year 0.32 1.95 0.78 0.11 10-year 0.48 2.85 0.78 0.16 100- ear 0.67 3.90 0.78 0.23 Post-Development (Basin ONDEV-B) 2-year 0.89 1.95 2.52 0.30 10-year 1.41 2.85 2.52 0.48 100- ear 2.02 3.85 2.52 0.69 Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 5 D:,DATA PROJECTS SRECOOO4,CLF2DOC • • R/W LINE L � y --� EXIST. D/W� " 60 SD- TJ� i 60" CONC. SIDEWALK / HI-1 • • 8SS _.....L_ _ / o ❑ O —�� x IIH�, __ J _ 50 25 0 50 CURB & GUTTER _ --__ __ _ 16 i PROPOSED 12" SD OUTFALL = — — PROPOSED 12" SD OUTFALL ASPHALT - - — — — — — .. ---- — — — — - I - I SCALE IN FEET I i o m LI N D AVENUE __ ��---W N - __-- � — CURB & GUTTER — ��, -- ) NO2'09'37"E 5.37e3'' n — ,��� i aEL _�_\_ e n I . . , 16„W 16 W � e n � ,-i�l�l`% �Ci�Y - �-- ------ II C) V /�. ( _ Th �,/ I rr"� �I to ___, �� 1 u S0 st ill 1' &ELE° y 1 v., — 09'06'53" i I-^a--------- 2043.79' �� /� ---- ` j Ij IQ 325.13' // /ii,/ r II ~/ / t7& // Ir;l— I WPROPOSF'D SOUTHER /:re` I 1 —1 DETENTION--FA£-tLiTY -J ,. S 1 = r i I\ v� • �� qoS I i� - '1 _- 17 -- S l I - 1 \ \\ BASIN _ / -- I 1 1. 0k Y \, PROPOSED BIOSWALE 17 // I.D. PROPOSED NORTHE' 1 1II - \`, BASIN I.D. ONDEV—B DETENTION FACILIT1� �— \I • ONDEV-A ONEX-B i_ 1 1 ' 'i \1 ONEX-A ( I i im !— PAYED. AREA ONLY) J BIO-2 (PAVED AREA ONLY) 1 II I , lik,\\ _ I PROPOSED PROPERTY II LINE (362.20') % I 1 �I e I / \ \ I o / I / / /p-R-QPbSD,-BI OSWALELC) in M N. / / I I J- LOT 7lii IN N. - / / � \� + \\ 1 \ ( ( 7. ,i®�I � 1 1 I / ��.-- --- / \ _---\ -- i = = �- -�`=T� '' —� ---- c_"_ —� �'::� - \\ /fi11 r-- T - 3 3 T s-- —Y —E —CZ- 'r' 1l I \II F W pI ...... — I1 ii II II EASEMENT FOR WETLAND PROTECTION 16 I ...._ .,,, itil o A.F NO. 9206302702 (EXHIBIT "E") „�'� lg EXIS-T-ING BERM _ 16 ---` 1, ,„� \r_ 1j� — 1-d HJ1H ? ill I I°I —\� v. 15 N0 `50'n9"F _ — �t�=t'- 0' - --U11 5:0 2•1 AN,`fl-h,Sui!o 209 Y.OWA'•7ASNOMTON 5E033 jO —— —— �!r 1 I I (=V NCH:.20E)E22-2677 FA[(20E)E22-Er4 III I 1 -- II 1 �` CITY OF RENTON I III Y I I \ I I \ I I. 1 ° DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS UNIFIRST CORPORATION POST-DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS FIGURE 3 o DESIGNED: BC.T. DATE:9/24/97 FILE NAME:8451NS O.4G u DRAWN: AL.K. CHECKED: B.G.T. SCALE: 1" -50' n¢n MO. PAGE: 3 NO. REVISION BY APPR. DATE APPROVED: SHEET: I OF: 1 Conceptual Drainage St'',__ . ar Commercial Laundry Facility _ October 1997 IV. CORE REQUIREMENTS A. Core Requirement#1: Discharge at the natural location The proposed onsite conditions and patterns emulate those of the existing site conditions. The developed onsite runoff will be routed via surface flow within the onsite street/parking section, stored within two onsite detention facilities and discharged to the west into an existing storm drain within Lind Avenue. The post-development runoff will be discharged at two locations to approximate the existing sheet flow conditions. B. Core Requirement#2: Off-site analysis An existing 60-inch storm sewer system is located within Lind Avenue. An outfall storm drain system will be constructed for each of the onsite detention facilities that will serve to connect to two existing storm drain stubs adjacent to the site (see detailed discussion within Section VII, entitled "offsite analysis"). C. Core Requirement#3: Runoff control Runoff control will be provided for the commercial laundry facility subdivision by constructing two onsite detention facilities capable of capturing the post- development flow rates and releasing them at the existing conditions peak runoff rates for the 2, 10 and 100-year, 24-hour storm events. A detailed discussion of the design and calculations for the volume of the detention basin is included in the next section. D. Core Requirement#4: Conveyance System There is one proposed onsite conveyance system. The system consists of the onsite paved street/parking section, which will route surface flows as shallow channel flow to both the northern and southern edge of the site, where they will be routed through a biofiltration swale and a detention facility prior to being released from the site. E. Core Requirement#5: Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan An erosion and sediment control plan, which will serve to minimi7e soil erosion/sedimentation during the proposed site construction, will be prepared for the final submittal of the commercial laundry facility improvement 'plans. Temporary erosion and sediment control BMP's will be implemented during the project construction phase. BMP's will include perimeter protection silt fencing (where necessary), stabilized construction entrances, catch basin protection, and permanent cover protection(landscaping). ' Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 7 D:DATA'.PROJECTS TREC0004 CLF=.DOC Conceptual Drainage Stuc` _.•Commercial Laundry Facility October 1997 V. DETENTION/RETENTION A hydrologic analysis of the site was completed in order to determine the required on-site detention necessary to eliminate negative downstream impacts due to development. An analysis was completed utilizing the WaterWorks'software to determine the existing and proposed runoff rates produced by both basins ONDEV- A and ONDEV-B for the 2, 10 and 100 year, 24-hour storm events and to determine the corresponding required northern and southern detention necessary to generate release rates equivalent to those produced by the pre-development condition. Additionally, the WaterWorks software was utilized to determine the .required detention storage volume, as well as the required dimensions of the discharge facility. The WaterWorks output is included within Appendix II and indicates that the required on-site detention volume is approximately 6750 cubic feet and 1500 cubic feet for the northern and southern detention facilities, respectively. The northern detention facility will be approximately 20 feet long by 10 feet wide. This detention facility is designed to contain all of the developed runoff from the building roof, as well as a good portion of the developed site (see Figure 3).,The proposed detention outfall system will be a 12-inch storm drain pipe which will bend southwesterly to connect to the existing 12-inch storm drain stub (from the 60-inch storm drain) crossing Lind Avenue. The southern detention facility will be approximately 15 feet long by 10 feet wide. This facility is considerably smaller than the northern facility, as it only takes a portion of the developed site runoff, not including runoff from the commercial laundry facility roof. The outfall from the southern facility will be via a 12-inch pipe connecting to an existing 24-inch storm drain stub (from the 60-inch pipe) crossing Lind Avenue. VI. WATER QUALITY . Construction of the proposed commercial laundry facility will create a. total of approximately 1.21 acres of impervious area subject to vehicular travel (including onsite pavement and parking). The aforementioned impervious area is divided into two sections, 0.57 acres within the southern portion of the site and 0.64 acres within the northern portion of the site. Therefore, a biofiltration swale will be placed at both the northerly and southerly edge of the commercial site at the terminus of the impervious area to collect runoff from these impervious areas (see Figure 3). The biofiltration swale will be sized according to the design criteria outlined in Section 4.6.4 within the SWDM. Specific design requirements are discussed below. • Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 8 0:.DATAT ROJ ECPS\TREC0004'CLFS.DOC Conceptual Drainage Str`'.._ _ br Commercial Laundry Facility - October 1997 Both of the proposed biofiltration swales for the commercial laundry facility(northern and southern) will be installed prior to the proposed peak rate runoff facility, therefore they will be designed to capture the flowrates generated by the developed 2- year, 24-hour design storm. Additionally, the swales are capable of conveying the 100-year flows generated for the developed conditions within the velocity parameters specified in the SWDM. The northerly swale is proposed to be a grass-lined, • trapezoidal channel with a 6-foot bottom width and 3:1 sideslopes. The southerly bio-swale is proposed to have a 5-foot bottom width and 3:1 sideslopes. Preliminary biofiltration calculations were completed under the assumption that the two swales would equal the total required 200 feet (100 feet each). Biofiltration swale data is as follows: Basin BIO-1 (southern paved/parkine portion of the site) 2-year, 24 Hour Developed Storm Flowrate: =0.24 cfs • Design Swale(developed 2-year,24-hour design storm within BSWALE1): • Length= 100 feet • Width=5 feet • Slope= 1.0% • "n"Value=0.35 _ • Depth of Flow=0.25 feet • Surface Area= 740 sq. ft. • Velocity= 0.16 fps 100-year,24 Hour Storm flowrate(BIO-1 A): =0.50 cfs • Design Swale(developed 100-year, 24-hour storm within BS WALE 1 A): • Length= 100 feet • Width=6 feet • Slope= 1.00% • "n"Value=0.025 ' • Depth of Flow=0.08 feet • Surface Area= 550 sq. ft. • Velocity= 1.11 fps Basin BIO-2(northern paved/parkin2 portion of the site) Developed 2-year,24 Hour Storm flowrate: =0.27 cfs • Design Swale(developed 2-year,24-hour design storm within BSWALE2): • Length= 100 feet • • Width=6.0 feet • Slope= 1.0% • "n"Value=0.35 • Depth of Flow=0.25 feet • Surface Area= 740 sq. ft. • • Velocity=0.15 fps • Peterson Consulting Engineers . Page 9 D:DATA PROJECTS TREC0004 CLF2.DOC Conceptual Drainage St''' _ Jr Commercial Laundry Facility October 1997 100-year,24 Hour Storm flowrate: = 0.56 cfs • Design Swale(100-year, 24-hour storm within BSWALE2A): • Length= 100 feet • Width= 6.0 feet • Slope= 1:00% • `n"Value=0.025 • Depth of Flow= 0.08 feet • Surface Area= 550 sq. ft. • Velocity= 1.09 fps Copies of the WaterWorks biofiltration swale calculations are included in Appendix III. VII. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS As shown in Figure 3, an existing 60-inch stormsewer is located within the north half of Lind Avenue. Two existing stormsewer stubs extend from the existing 60-inch stormsewer adjacent to the site; one 24-inch stub at the southwest corner of the site, and one,15-inch going in to 'a 12-inch stub located at the midpoint of the western boundary. The outfall pipe from the southerly detention facility will consist of approximately 40 LF and will connect to the 24-inch lateral stub. The northerly detention facility will 'discharge into a 12-inch pipe and will be extended approximately 270 LF to the southwest to the 12-inch lateral stub. Both of the stubs will contribute flows to the existing 60-inch pipe. The report entitled "Drainage'Calculations for U.S. Rentals," completed by Concept Engineering, indicates that the City of Renton recognizes a tailwater conditions in the 60-inch pipe within Lind Avenue. According to information within the report, development projects within the area are required to base their conveyance analyses on a 2-year tailwater elevation of 14.6 (NAVD 88). Converted to the vertical datum used for the commercial laundry facility, the tailwater elevation is approximately 11.26 feet. This tailwater was adjusted for our site location by using the 60-inch gradient and the distance from the U.S. Rentals site. The StormCad program by Haestad was utilized to determine the hydraulic grade lines of the two storm.drain pipes discharging 2-year developed site flows. The StormCad output is included in Appendix IV. • Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 10 • Di DATA''PROJECTS\\TRECO004.CLF2.DOC Conceptual Drainage Stu...;,:,r Commercial Laundry Facility - October 1997 VIII. CONCLUSION Based on the information contained within this Conceptual Technical Information Report, the construction of the proposed commercial laundry facility is not expected to create a negative impact on the existing adjacent areas. Runoff from the site will be routed within the proposed on-site street/parking sections, routed through two biofiltration swales and captured within two detention facilities located within the southern and the northern portion of the site. • • • Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 11 D:DATA'\PROJECIS'TREC0004\CLF2DOC APPENDIX I HYDROLOGIC PARAMETERS AND CALCULATIONS • DRAINAGE CALCULATION INFORMATION Precipitation Site runoff, infiltration and water quality treatment rates were calculated using WaterWorks software with the SCS Type 1-A, 24-hour storm event. Precipitation was determined from the King County SWDM Manual Isopluvial Maps for the 2, 10 and 100-year, 24-hour storm events. Precipitation rates are: • 2 Year,24 Hour Storm: 1.95 inches • 10 Year,24 Hour Storm: 2.85 inches • 100 Year,24 Hour Storm: 3.85 inches Soil Class Based on a detailed onsite soils analysis completed by Terra Associates, the majority of the site contains Alluvium soils. This soil type is considered hydrologic soil class "C" per the SWDM. Curve Numbers The pre and post-development flow rates for the commercial laundry facility were calculated to determine the required onsite detention. Runoff for the pre-developed site is based on approximately 3.3 acres of low growing brush and grasslands and the developed site is based on.1.21 acres of pavement and 0.93 acres of roof. Curve number values for the pre and post- development calculations are: Pre Developed Condition • Pervious(brush and grasslands) acres @ CN= 89 Post-Developed Condition • Impervious(Pvmt): acres @ CN=98 • Pervious: (landscape area) acres @ CN=90 • Impervious(roofs and driveways) acres @ CN=98 KING COUNTY, -_ 4SHINGTON, SURFACE W - ER DESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1C 2-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS liiirlilNilqi ill• - - ✓ .may - /11.-. Vilh Fr Pk "ItAlf Millittadifi • - # ASIIIKIA 1117;itingt- ) lirtStik ' - APP-114 le01.a7-111infir 111,iilt ' , , .1.• • . 4ffigag‘& 41:illeript A lkilk4ii,...0‘ cg`a . . .. 19. / . °-IIMI-aPilllir •-: -11011111"trak#: . . -st.1111\ / ' - - ftlii .....,;:;_ ... . fig drA tize*A`Ztla.: 1 IrAlitt Willillpi .10 ,,t) cb ketk,- )11:s: . a? ___, AMIN lig ; ti,(t.iii . 11-1!..7111Wielf . CV C. \ k- - —At . 4 . ii.or.,inti.vAirer mi, -1g,:.,=,., i ,. .1...t,-.-40- h, ,I ._.. Sy -----*a. - ,o0hi - i ' - .03*.'‘v 1* lbit ‘ , .16111; -4.:--AITP--.....,rwmir-wie"..700a0011111.A;•-,-.6- 'V,. ,„.„, . ,,,) ,, i,.,.„, ,_.,..,, . .„. ja. *Orli ►111i ,'''./ --z• VA irVi* I filf itatIk . tip - if lt._ • ,, L: . PA,i =k --,'_...(4‘,**..., v..- IV: t; ,i51% .i\. ‘',4N -:-Wq,‘,, , - - ‘1 - . - ii., - • --I% 2 . : 11,01111I‘A-,,,nok,43.-.„4. ,,... . . 111FIr_ -. 6.iiia , : ' :.; .s' ' Witiliit %irip,..4111104‘*% ,IL N- :- i -`, t•.;,64 a gi • .4Faii Iiiiivire,c• i _.. ‘N!, . ilimmt._ k 'IL-- .9 .4 :ile, 4 it !v.-7 . .1._,. ... .... 11,-kk, A c = _. 7 , . _ t__._ . 11 mit , -, imr,.--, 11, 7 0 . ?, .1 ,_,,,..„,..4,,,r,,,,, ,,, tp ; .,& J .,;.;,,---)--- Ilk\L%. .Ala ' !I ,.' *It 0. Mill ... 1 1 • . Iplc., 1 lli i , IS,.. Fa .i , ''.! , �,..8,. ` � ( 'ram ,_ nii......._ , ,. rr.viillilf... .., .... _ . : ,_...„ . , ...._., lApj ' I „,„,ozsamr . si_ cm. '-7-7----,-,. , h......10, r,_• .!..-- grpi ank Ana . fin , . 4 ,, mir - .. i On /- i o _ l‘Will.,s mo L ...4-' k, IV_-;t •.r-, :- #1 . ir ,, ) 9 ......‘WEit 'i ' .7 �`JttJ�LIIIi , 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION r ilrargf ai it ' ��- I�l�lir:y� -�. ,■3.4�" ISOPLUVIALS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR et, ��,� , - • 3 TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES .' _ titi •� -. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 MILS — o. 1:300,000 3.5.1-8 k7"g 1/9( • • KING COUNTY, N. nS.HINGTON, SURFACE WA iR DESIGN MANUAL FIG/SURE 3.5.1E 10-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS • • .1 \:\ ?*LlilaNik_tVilL1-4.111% ' -i 't fi. . -'----- A . ,__, : oitlivieparlf, • • iiiiim w ipitifi* 24 i ..-- . Sillgri A ' ilit A illiks. - ii31."'-'Ii... 0A_Iv_.,...,4„,:x-yr,..' AlleribTO NAP . N\N ., 2.6 1 owiPpleT:w;i1440.91 VIM nk, il 6..- r-.....1:de � ..41,4 Th_lt / . 2.8 - ` �l '1r %�� r . 2f% \ ki‘.18,41z_ r\ '- ' 1 ;AO allAillik&IIIWL.,,e...".' Ifi _,,„ ,, . , aoOM 1111010 thy •, , 2- x ; �� i��-jj �€ut�•-=ice ..!. • 1-, ,,.. • e„,.,, 7,m.j.2 i ,. 3.1 ii, vm klie: m4.. pol... . ' •h: k, • il a .1P4r*P- . /db._ ._, .41c," • 3.2 ‘1 .fitir' �� !AN�►�_ . a - Ail, , .-7 lig h V .----,1”. - ''is ' N't...., - 33 ! - - \ Mai N _ iiimothAtrA,-14---. i .0.4.00,_ //„.r,._.... . \,.. 012...13 .. 4:11a..14111 lik gr Sib ----- ,+ , iilii . 1/44c01p1_ 01111 lMarilt lik.c3, , 1 . , • - i . ' ,. ..,.. =Id Nug timilip.. ,, ,t, , , . . . Q . ,- ---- 7.1i4: willidiNs '• ..- \ . \' . .' t.:: -... . ..' I .:,:fr.- , \ . ,,:_..i. 7,11- . or . ,, 11-k . , 4 1 —.::.:( I ' 1 . -••- `e., 1-71. 4:;:ar:„ ...t 1 „./ ' clifill z--- ` T 1 i am pv-pr ma-all . -i lic•,0:11111111 ..., . .:.. . . . . / ( • f _ - . \ . '- i ..."111' -Jr • r- - , . NA. , , n i ... ( • ?1 ircillill 1‘ frili.77°:,.;:)_:111-1 , ,1. c,„=.- 0. 4-, . ' I ' 1 j . ':::'11A601111111 . \7 -,___,- . ,. . --- *IP 1 in MA / - \- , 41:0) - . it -- •••___ FtiAmaiiiisatic.101,42140410. - _ ,... _. . 'P... r Fe . f-a":1" =• .- . - • liff k -•. '-'--Ikr- , . • • itt„ ' . "r--7. - " --------: k-,..‘11111N j tilliail VrAW�C PIM •10-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION : � ; OyO4 '� 3.40°"` ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YEAR 24-HOUR (V. qtrierIeg, - - TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 30 I = . 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles s _ , W 1:300,000 3.5.1-10 • 3y 1/90 4.0 KING COUNTY, WASH 'GTON, SURFACE WATER _ _: SIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1F 25-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS /tP" : - - -- -------•-- ---- --- • LwIrahrtellrivhal - R49 ---- .11.1%-euillIWir TO ir ‘, i ,--11 ,1. 14111 items am LI 3.7 i mmiigitigAgi, *J40;110,AtaseilliNik_ w_ e'•- rl y lekNii , . • SWArlik '''' ( tkvEr _�\� ; lit. pipm_ VA* ' it { 1 , '.- V.Miltirtill , , g ?r‹.14. _legfilli _4",./Di u6 ;'A•, 4: -i-NliI flail i yor 'Fi,.-'�f'. l ovir `•,- � �` :v, . - . a=,4 i,P,„i: Mae -k ig. ..114,0117.12 -.T.. . ti ' 111.4:; '‘4111111,1.1\ ,:, tj..,. ifill igir0ArellrOP•'"'""illi°..elmommommill0P______maifrel\t-- ., - -a:" At\ 1 (.', ffl. Slit ‘10 • wW7.44/fribeiitik's ,k ,‘ k ......,0 , f r- - -- Re._ail \NA -- -Aratin,& „-:-. ._ ...,,, ,_ -14:. / ,/.= .P --- ' . irs,NalikozAmiDvao1/4. , •lopi,_, 5.5i C. , igainki*VOINV\ , „ .iiitiswifyik, --_-2,.! . 1., ,_4mr8 \ t* . ° tr---"*-- .4r-1, lits r-- Z -- '',, • \ ' : 't I- - — s-. ,4 ws-iliiv CIL- , \ ci- 'k elliii ",. - - ,-. '1 ' : 11 , - ‘!‘ al IZ ,-.4,; v.)" ' • . , - `i- ". _..,.11wrt = --- \`‘._101. v / , .. 1 - . tik -'' . 11 la 4 mi, A .„ ,‘„,„„ 901.,„, - ,....: iliklinii limerillikr /1.. Am ‹,,...'‘.' i .,..', - I. reglilig WI\M. 151 OAdar.il ii*".*" Hit killaillreigiallil ,.._._ , _ s '-"-- 0 - All ••58.*Vb411 itirl 1)4v1. .'' - ' ' -4 A"- % .1 lc/ . , _ ffti ir,ts terilki. 41M--ilk lit 11- i re A 84, o ,141 444:- %-� i 14.1 � te 7 , tei Hu A , j VI . 11111.11' Arr55-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION ��` - :;;�r, • • SS 3.4 ISOPLUVIALS OF 25-YEAR 24-HOUR 4k.w1 r, _ TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 641 a.$ nny 1 � 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BMlles 3.5.1-11 ��C �0 `_ yam . _ 1/90 is 300,000 KING COUNTY, WAS ' .NGTON, SURFACE WATE. 1. . ESIGN MANUAL FIGURE 3.5.1H 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS • 43- riireAVICel.FI , �eit:,.1_,A1- _J .� v, . _. . it; ipm 1 ''slit ..1 ra!rpollict elk . ala , 4i411/0 • . ,g6i i annwpw/WP TAFIORIP.0 • di" t,t,\ . "44b4-% 9.. tedo. ,E. .—_... ...b. . r.,,, ,,,,..4.7,31F40.--.7.-•=ii-retrelirkir ' 1":"6)0 l'ilk . 01 4111 IMIi74) r 7 • 42' ,4\-44,i'libtkifr inimokiri- Vr `• , f . 43 ) , - ,k.44041*-, ./to...411,, iii .,_ _Aff.r i lbw 14 .\ - ,:,,..„ -efitiarl --I•NLIirwifiteraLliii f/J,---,PI i 'di • : 15A..1114, : ,--•;. :, ileeValil ........-..--.... -411tt ir , ,...4riArt, \ likilikiki . ,isirasvi ;".\.1-.4,16,,Apttilt. ...4,04;11.wroscro...."1""Tr., .. .".. v: M: As- - 1,?1iei .,,,eirili_m,.4. .....2 14" ., ./ lk.k.- -- \Lib • „low :.,, ..„1,‘,..,..... ..... 16 1 z , ....;::\ li•itik\A--,L.:,,tericks , kr _ __y -444010,... Li. 4\11ithsio • „i3/4 liovi-k, -ii:(8., ox %),(41 ..4 , •----FAIN-2-t: \ ::=:. : 0113, TPA\ 141 AI4k. • • • ' 1111616,4110filak , Vie : \ 4*, i , . HUT La itto_!1,41Mliks% • i .rio .,--._ ,,-„R, - .tiMilvidik Yu It.;%i 1111V. -1 it kl �' .� 44 ) , !• , .01 . ..--: -,*..4 11.14 - `:, . ‘114.‘,,,_._.s=si ,, ir /ore • . „. .. , ....,11 . C. 141 Sri 1 \s. 1411.414.11,11i 11 11)\ ieer7c1i1,1k JII -—.s.•.\- 4:',.,,_A_ r•/eM4..,......j,.1..•)r;!4 x l!ktlg rA*.i,Mfaa‘,k,i il!gi-pi.f1-..,0 1 rai.i. ii ,. .,..:._ fi1:r4; - % LwwL51*&J4A ..:• . gall .k"-- i ' -- • . .. .friti. fat, gmiN,Faira_ 14 th, ,.. ..§1t, •. cigW:i ,,Mors '' '..- -"M-140/01f j it ,., ,v - . ,c '.:=III. I • . ItWitliti 1 • t 1. 't- t;• . - •----.- '' . - -- —.4417/ .i - o -7. - q :4021FAVACII0f. -. • 100-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION dr ! . OI , 6.�- O 3.4 ISOPLUVIALS OF 10o-YEAR 24HOUR �` 0N� ritiVai /�¢'a TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES i • Q► tb _ - 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mlles Og �K� -'�„, is 300,000 3.5.1-13 • �Q : ._ • 1/90 KING COUNTY, \V HINGTON, SURFACE WA ': R DESIGN MANUAL (2) CN values can be area weighted when they apply to pervious areas of similar CN's (within 20 l CN points). However, high CN areas should not be combined with low CN areas (unless the � low CN areas are less than 1 5% of the subbasin). In this case, separate hydrographs should be generated and summed to form one hydrograph. FIGURE 3.5.2A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS IN KING COUNTY ' HYDROLOGIC HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP GROUP* SOIL GROUP GROUP* Alderwood C Orcas Peat D Arents, Alderwood Material C Oridia D Arents, Everett Material B Ovall C Beausite C Pilchuck C Bellingham D Puget D Briscot D Puyallup B Buckley D Ragnar B Coastal Beaches Variable Renton D Earlmont Silt Loam D Riverwash Variable Edgewick C Salal C Everett A/B ''Sammamish D Indianola A Seattle D Kitsap C Shacar D Klaus C Si Silt C Mixed Alluvial Land Variable Snohomish D Neilton A Sultan C Newberg B Tukwila D Nooksack C Urban Variable Normal Sandy Loam D Woodinville D HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high infiltration rates, even when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of deep, well-to-excessively drained sands or gravels. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. B. (Moderately low runoff potential). Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. . C. (Moderately high runoff potentiai). Soils having slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine to fine textures. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. D. (High runoff potential). Soils having very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a hardpan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. t * From SCS, TR-55, Second Edition,June 1986, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made from SCS, Soil Interpretation - Record, Form #5, September 1988. 3.5.2-2 11/92 • KING COUNTY, W , -IINGTON, SURFACE WA R DESIGN MANUAL • TABLE 3.5.2B SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS ` SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type 1A rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION AB CD • Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 • Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89 Wood or forest land: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86 Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. good condition: • grass cover•on 75% or more of the area 68 80 86 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area . 77 85 90 92 _ Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89 • Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 98 98 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion 3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 DU/GA 48 5.5 DU/GA 50 • 6.0 DU/GA 52 6.5 DU/GA 54 7.0 DU/GA 56 Planned unit developments, % impervious condominiums, apartments, must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. (1) For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers refer to National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers. gGO 3.5.2-3 11/92 9/24/97 2 :52 :49 r___ Peterson Engineering asulting page 1 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY y HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS 2, 10 AND 100-YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D-00100A NAME: Dev. 100 Yr Storm, ONDEV-A SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA - • 0 .78 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 04 Acres 0 .74 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 89 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 5 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Channel L: 100 . 00 kc:17 . 00 s: 0. 0100 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 1 . 95 s: 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Shallow L: 200 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s: 0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 0 . 67 cfs VOL: 0 .23 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min BASIN ID: D-00100B NAME: Dev. 100 Yr Storm, ONDEV-B SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 .52 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . :. 0 . 81 Acres 1 . 71 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 89 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 5 . 00 min 10 . 97 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach -Channel L: 100 . 00 kc: 17 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Sheet L: 400 . 00 ns: 0 . 0110 p2yr: 1.95 s : 0 . 0050 impTcReach - Shallow L: 450 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s: 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE: 2 . 02 cfs VOL: 0 . 69 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min BASIN ID: D-0010A NAME: Developed 10 Yr Storm, ONDEV-A SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 78 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV ' IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 85 inches AREA. . : 0 . 04 Acres 0 . 74 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 89 . 00 98 . 00 TC 5 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Channel L: 100 . 00 kc:17 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 01I0 p2yr: 1 . 95 s : 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Shallow L: 200 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s: 0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 0 .48 cfs VOL: 0 .16 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min • 9/24/97 2 :52 :49 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 2 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS 2, 10 AND 100-YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: D-0010B NAME: Developed 10 Yr Storm, ONDEV-B SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 .52 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 .85 inches AREA. . : 0 . 81 Acres 1 .71 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 89 . 00 98 . 00 TC 5 . 00 min 10 . 97 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Channel L: 100 . 00 kc: 17 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Sheet L: 400 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 1 . 95 s : 0 . 0050 impTcReach - Shallow L: 450 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE: 1 .41 cfs VOL: 0 .48 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min BASIN ID: D-002A NAME: Developed 2 Yr Storm, ONDEV-A SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 78 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 1 . 95 inches AREA. . : 0 . 04 Acres 0 .74 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 89 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 5 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach -Channel L: 100 . 00 kc: 17 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 1 . 95 s : 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Shallow L:_ 200 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 0 .32 cfs VOL: 0 . 11 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min BASIN ID: D-002B NAME: Developed 2 Yr Storm, ONDEV-B ' SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 .52 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs ' RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 1. 95 inches AREA. . : 0 . 81 Acres 1. 71 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 89 . 00 98 . 00 TC 5 . 00 min 10 . 97 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Channel L: 100 . 00 kc: 17 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Sheet L: 400 . 00 ns : 0 . 0110 p2yr: 1. 95 S : 0 . 0050 impTcReach - Shallow L: 450 . 00 ks:27 . 00 s : 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE: 0 . 89 cfs VOL: 0 . 30 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min 4 9/24/97 2 :52 :49 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 3 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY . HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS 2, 10 AND 100-YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: E-002A NAME: Existing 2 Yr Storm -ONEXA SCS METHODOLOGY. TOTAL AREA • 0 .78 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 1 .95 inches AREA. . : 0 .78 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 89 . 00 0 . 00 TC 7 .57 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0500 p2yr: 1 . 95 s : 0 . 0150 TcReach - .Shallow L: 190 . 00 ks:13 . 00 s : 0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 0 .16 cfs VOL: 0 . 06 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min BASIN ID: E-002B NAME: Existing 2 Yr Storm - ONEXB SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA . • 2 .52 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 1.95 inches AREA. . : 2 .,52 Acres , 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 89 . 00 0 . 00 TC • 7 .57 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0500 p2yr: 1.95 s : 0 . 0150 TcReach - Shallow L: 190 . 00 ks :13 . 00 s : 0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 0 .53 cfs VOL: 0 .20 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min' BASIN ID: E-0100A NAME: Existing 100 Yr Storm -ONEXA SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 78 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 .78 Acres '0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.. 00 min CN • 89 . 00. 0 . 00 TC • 7 .57 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0500 p2yr: 1.95 s: 0 . 0150 TcReach - Shallow L: 190 . 00 ks:13 . 00 s: 0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 0 .51 cfs VOL: 0 . 17 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min 9/24/97 2 :52 :49 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 4 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS 2, 10 AND 100-YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: E-0100B NAME: Existing 100 Yr Storm -ONEXB SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 2 .52 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 .00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 2 .52 Acres 0 . 00 .Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10. 00 min CN • 89 . 00 0 . 00 TC • 7 .57 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns: 0 . 0500 p2yr: 1.95 s: 0 . 0150 TcReach - Shallow L: 190 . 00 ks :13 . 00 s : 0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 1. 65 cfs VOL: 0 .55 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min BASIN ID: E-010A NAME: Existing 10 Yr Storm -ONEXA SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 .78 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV ' IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 85 inches AREA. . : 0 . 78 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min CN • 89 . 00 0 . 00 TC 7 .57 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach -Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0500 p2yr: 1 . 95 s : 0 . 0150 TcReach - Shallow L: 190. 00 ks:13 . 00 s: 0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 0 .32 cfs VOL: 0 . 11 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min BASIN ID: E-010B NAME: Existing 10 Yr Storm -ONEXB SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • . 2 .52 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 2 . 85 inches AREA. . : 2 .52 Acres 0 . 00 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 89 . 00 0 . 00 TC • 7 .57 min 0 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0500 p2yr: 1.95 s : 0 . 0150 TcReach - Shallow L: 190 . 00 ks:13 . 00 s: 0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 1 . 03 cfs VOL: 0 .36 .Ac-ft TIME: 500 min v- 9/24/97 2 :52 :49 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 5 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS 2, 10 AND 100-YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf\AcFt Acres 1 0 .163 500 2692 cf 0 .78 2 0 .318 500 4824 cf 0 . 78 3 0 .510 500 7470• cf 0 .78 4 0 .319 500 4627 cf 0 . 78 5 0 .482 500 7066 cf 0 . 78 6 0 . 672 500 9928 cf 0 .78 7 0 . 129 560 4627 cf 0 . 78 8 0 . 173 560 7066 cf 0 . 78 9 0 .414 530 9928 cf 0 . 78 10 0 . 529 500 8711 cf 2 . 52 11 1 . 030 500 15611 Cf 2 .52 12 1 .651 500 24173 cf 2 .52 13 0 . 886 500 13194 cf 2 . 52 14 1 .406 500 20806 Cf 2 .52 15 2 . 021 500 29870 Cf 2 . 52 16 0 .271 590 13194 Cf 2 . 52 17 0 .623 550 20806 cf 2 . 52 18 0 . 983 550 29870 cf 2 . 52 APPENDIX II DETENTION CALCULATIONS 10/8/97 9 :24 :58 am Peterson Engineering Consulting page 3 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS 2, 25 AND 100-YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE • < DESCRIPTION > (cue) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) 2-yr release 0.16 0.32 POND1 Orifice2 14.73 7 437.62 cf 10-yr release 0.32 0.48 POND1 Orifice2 15.31 8 679.43 cf 100-year release 0.51 0.67 POND1 Orifice2 15.77 9 914.60 cf 10/8/97 9 :35 : 12 am Peterson Engineering Consulting page 1 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS 2, 25 AND 100-YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE DESCRIPTION > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf) 2-yr release 0.53 0.89 POND2 Orifice3 15.44 16 922.12 cf 10-yr release 1.03 1.41 POND2 Orifice3 16.27 17 1478.58 cf 100-year release 1.65 2.02 POND2 Orifice3 16.93 18 2039.50 cf 10/8/97 9 :32 : 9 am Peterson Engineering Consulting page 1 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS 2, 25 AND 100-YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS. STAGE STORAGE TABLE TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. POND1 Description: DETENTION POND - SOUTH Length: 15 . 00 ft. Width: 10 . 00 ft. Side Slope 1 : 2 Side Slope 3 : 2 Side Slope 2 : 2 Side Slope 4 : 2 Infiltration Rate: 0 . 00 min/inch STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Pt- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Pt- 13.00 0.0000 0.0000 13.80 154.73 0.0036 14.60 389.85 0.0089 15.40 721.73 0.0166 13.10 15.505 0.0004 13.90 179.39 0.0041 14.70 425.70 0.0098 15.50 770.83 0.0177 13.20 32.043 0.0007 14.00 205.33 0.0047 14.80 463.10 0.0106 15.60 821.74 0.0189 13.30 49.644 0.0011 14.10 232.60 0.0053 14.90 502.08 0.0115 15.70 874.48 0.0201 13.40 68.341 0.0016 14.20 261.22 0.0060 15.00 542.67 0.0125 15.80 929.08 0.0213 13.50 88.167 0.0020 14.30 291.22 0.0067 15.10 584.89 0.0134 15.90 985.57 0.0226 13.60 109.15 0.0025 14.40 322.63 0.0074 15.20 628.79 0.0144 16.00 1044 0.0240 13.70 131.33 0.0030 14.50 355.50 0.0082 15.30 674.39 0.0155 10/8/97 9 :32 : 9 am Peterson Engineering Consulting page 2 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS 2, 25 AND 100-YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS STAGE STORAGE TABLE TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. POND2 Description: DETENTION POND - NORTH Length: 20 . 00 ft . Width: 10 . 00 ft . Side Slope 1: 2. Side Slope 3 : 2 Side Slope 2 : 2 Side Slope 4 : 2 Infiltration Rate: 0 . 00 min/inch STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE -----STORAGE----> STAGE <----STORAGE----> (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Pt- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Ft- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Pt- (ft) ---cf--- --Ac-Pt- 13.00 0.0000 0.0000 14.10 299.70 0.0069 15.20 787.19 0.0181 16.30 1505 0.0346 13.10 20.605 0.0005 14.20 335.62 0.0077 15.30 842.29 0.0193 16.40 1583 0.0363 12.20 42.443 0.0010 14.30 373.12 0.0086 15.40 899.33 0.0206 16.50 1664 0.0382 13.30 65.544 0.0015 14.40 412.23 0.0095 15.50 958.33 0.0220 16.60 1746 0.0401 13.40 89.941 0.0021 14.50 453.00 0.0104 15.60 1019 0.0234 16.70 1832 0.0420 13.50 115.67 0.0027 14.60 495.45 0.0114 15.70 1082 0.0248 16.80 1919 0.0441 13.60 142.75 0.0033 14.70 539.60 0.0124 15.8p 1147 0.0263 16.90 2009 0.0461 13.70 171.23 0.0039 14.80 585.50 0.0134 15.90 1215 0.0279 17.00 2101 0.0482 13.80 201.13 0.0046 14.90 633.18 0.0145 16.00 1284 0.0295 13.90 232.49 0.0053 15.00 682.67 0.0157 16.10 1355 0.0311 14.00 265.33 0.0061 15.10 733.99 0.0169 16.20 1429 0.0328 10/8/97 9 :32 :9 am Peterson Engineering Consulting page 3 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS 2, 25 AND. 100-YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS STAGE DISCHARGE, TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. Orifice2 Description: POND1 AND POND2 OUTLET Outlet Elev: 13 . 00 Elev: 11. 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 2 .1387 in. Elev: 14.80 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 2 .5840 in. Elev: 15 .40 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 2 .7422 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> . STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfe (ft) ---cfa (ft) ---cfa (ft) ---cfa 13.00 0.0000 14.10 0.1302 15.20 0.2987 16.30 0.6410 13.10 0.0393 14.20 0.1360 15.30 0.3164 16.40 0.6621 13.20 0.0555 14.30 0.1415 15.40 0.3326 16.50 0.6825 13.30 0.0680 14.40 0,.1469 15.50 0.4124 16.60 0.7021 13.40 0.0785 14.50 0.1520 15.60 0.4535 16.70 0.7212 13.50 0.0878 14.60 0.1570 15.70 0.4876 16.80 0.7397 13.60 0.0961 14.70 0.1618 15.80 0.5179 16.90 0.7576 13.70 0.1038 14.80 0.1665 15.90 0.5457 17.00 0.7751 13.80 0.1110 14.90 0.2284 16.00 0.5715 13.90 0.1178 15.00 0.2566 16.10 0.5959 14.00 0.1241 15.10 0.2791 16.20 0.6189 _ 10/8/97 9 :32 :9 am Peterson Engineering Consulting page 4 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS 2, 25 AND 100-YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. Orifice3 Description: POND2 OUTLET Outlet Elev: 13 . 00 Elev: 11 . 00 ft Orifice Diameter: 3 .5332 in. Elev: 15 .50 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 4 .1953 in. Elev: 16 .40 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: 4 .5469 in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs (ft) ---cfs 13.00 0.0000 14.10 0.3553 15.20 0.5025 16.30 1.0426 13.10 0.1071 14.20 0.3711 15.30 0.5138 16.40 1.0778 13.20 0.1515 14.30 0.3863 15.40 0.5248 16.50 1.2888 13.30 0.1855 14.40 0.4008 15.50 0.5356 16.60 1.3946 13.40 0.2143 14.50 0.4149 15.60 0.6973 16.70 1.4821 13.50 0.2395 14.60 0.4285 15.70 0.7703 16.80 1.5598 13.60 0.2624 14.70 0.4417 15.80 0.8285 16.90 1.6309 13.70 0.2834 14.80 0.4545 15.90 0.8790 17.00 1.6971 13.80 0.3030 14.90 0.4670 16.00 0.9245 13.90 0.3214 15.00 0.4791 16.10 0.9664 14.00 0.3388 15.10 0.4909 16.20 1.0056 APPENDIX III BIOFILTRATION SWALE CALCULATIONS 9/24/97 4: 6 :42 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 1' COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY BIOSWALE CALCULATIONS 2 AND 100-YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: BIO'-1 NAME: PAVED AREAS WITHIN ONDEV-A SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 .57 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 1.95 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres 0 .57 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN 0 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 0 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 .0500 p2yr: 1 . 95 s: 0 . 0150 TcReach - Shallow L: 190 . 00 ks :13 . 00 s : 0 . 0200 impTcReach, = Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns: 0 . 0110 p2yr: 1 . 95 s; 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Shallow L: 200 . 00 ks :27 . 00 s : 0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 0 .24 cfs VOL: 0 . 08 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min BASIN ID: BIO-1A NAME: PAVED AREAS, ONDEV-A (100-YR) SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 .57 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 . 90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres 0 .57 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min ' CN - 0 . 00 98 . 00 TC. . . . : 0 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0500 p2yr: 1 . 95 s : 0 . 0150 TcReach - Shallow L: 190 . 00, ks :13 . 00 s: 0 . 0200 impTcReach - Sheet L:. 100 . 00 ns: 0 . 0110 p2yr: 1. 95 s : 0 . 0100 impTcReach - Shallow L: 200 . 00 ks:27 . 00 s :0 . 0200 PEAK RATE: 0 .50 cfs VOL: 0 .17 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min BASIN ID: BIO-2 NAME: PAVED AREAS WITHIN ONDEV-B • SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 .64 Acres BASEFLOWS : 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A ' • PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 1. 95 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres 0 .64 Acres TIME INTERVAL • 10 . 00 min. CN 0 . 00 98 . 00 TC 0 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0500 p2yr: 1 .95 s : 0 . 0150 TcReach - Shallow L: 190 . 00 ks:13 . 00 s: 0 . 0200 impTcReach - Shallow L: 250 . 00 ks:27 . 00 s: 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE: 0 .27 cfs VOL: 0 . 09 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min 9/24/97 4 :6 :42 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 2 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY BIOSWALE CALCULATIONS 2 AND 100-YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: BIO-2A NAME: PAVED AREAS, ONDEV-B (100-YR) SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • 0 . 64 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0 . 00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE • TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION • 3 .90 inches AREA. . : 0 . 00 Acres 0 .64 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10 . 00 min CN • 0 . 00 98 . 00 TC • 0 . 00 min 5 . 00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0 .20 TcReach - Sheet L: 100 . 00 ns : 0 . 0500 p2yr: 1. 95 s:0 . 0150 TcReach - Shallow L: 190 . 00 ks :13 . 00 s : 0 . 0200 impTcReach - Shallow L: 250 . 00 ks :27 .00 s : 0 . 0100 PEAK RATE: 0 .56 cfs VOL: 0 . 19 Ac-ft TIME: 500 min 9/24/97 4 : 6 :42 pm Peterson Engineering Consulting page 7 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY BIOSWALE CALCULATIONS 2 AND 100-YEAR, 24 HOUR STORM EVENTS REACH SUMMARY DITCH REACH ID No. BSWALE1 Ditch Length: 100 . 00 ft Ditch Width: 5 . 00 ft Side Slopel : 3 . 00 Ditch Slope: 0 . 0100 ft/ft Side Slope2 : 3 . 00 Contrib Bas: Mannings n : 0 .3500 Dn Invert 100 . 00 ft Dn W.S . Elev:100 .2500 Num Steps : 10 Trib Area: 0 .57 Ac. Design Flow : 0 .23 cfs Depth 0 .25 ft Vel 0 .16 fps Upstream W.S . Elev: 0 . 00 ft . DITCH REACH ID No. BSWALE1A Ditch Length: 100 . 00 ft Ditch Width: 5 . 00 ft Side Slopel : 3 . 00 Ditch Slope: 0 . 0100 ft/ft Side Slope2 : 3 . 00 Contrib Bas : Mannings n : 0 . 0250 Dn Invert 100 . 00 ft Dn W.S . Elev: 100 .2500 Num Steps : 10 Trib Area: 0 .57 Ac. Design Flow : 0 .50 cfs Depth 0 . 08 ft Vel 1 . 11 fps Upstream W.S . Elev: 0 .00 ft. DITCH REACH ID No. BSWALE2 Ditch Length: 100 . 00 ft Ditch Width: 6 . 00 ft Side Slopel : 3 . 00 Ditch Slope: 0 . 0100 ft/ft Side Slope2 : 3 . 00 Contrib Bas: Mannings n : 0 . 3500 Dn Invert 100 . 00 ft Dn W.S . Elev:100 .2500 Num Steps : 10 Trib Area: 0 . 64 Ac. Design Flow : 0 .26 cfs Depth 0 .25 ft Vel 0 .15 fps Upstream W.S. Elev: 0 . 00 ft. DITCH REACH ID No. BSWALE2A Ditch Length: 100 . 00 ft Ditch Width: 6 . 00 ft Side Slopel : 3 . 00 Ditch Slope: 0 . 0100 ft/ft Side Slope2 : 3 . 00 Contrib Bas : Mannings n : 0 . 0250 Dn Invert 100 . 00 ft Dn W.S. Elev:100 .2500 Num Steps : 10 Trib Area: 0 . 64 Ac . Design Flow : 0 .56 cfs Depth 0 . 08 ft Vel • 1 . 09 fps Upstream W.S . Elev: 0 . 00 ft . APPENDIX IV OFFSITE BACKWATER ANALYSIS Beginnir :alculation Cycle Discharge: 0.32 cfs at noc ET-1 ,Discharge: 0.32 cfs at node J-1 'Discharge: 0.32 cfs at node Outlet-1 Beginning iteration 1 Discharge: 0.32 cfs at node DET-1 Discharge: 0.32 cfs at node J-1 • Discharge: 0.32 cfs at node Outlet-1 Discharge Convergence Achieved in 1 iterations: relative error: 0.0 ** Warning: Design constraints not met. ** Problem: Flooding in system Information: Outlet-1 Known flow propogated from upstream junctions. Violation: P-2 does not meet minimum velocity constraint. Information: J-1 Known flow propogated from upstream junctions. Violation: P-1 does not meet minimum cover constraint at upstream end. Information: DET-1 Flooding condition. Calculations Complete ** Analysis Options ** • Friction method: Manning's Formula HGL Convergence Test: 0.001000 Maximum Network Traversals: 5 Number of Pipe Profile Steps: 5 Discharge Convergence Test: 0.001000 Maximum Design Passes: 3 . Network Quick View Hydraulic Grade Label I Length 1 Size I Discharge I Upstream I Downstream 1 P-1 40.00 12 inch 0.32 14.53 11.63 P-2 78 .00 24 inch 0.32 11. 63 11. 63 Elevations Label I Discharge I Ground . 1 Upstream HGL I Downstream HGL I DET-1 • 0.32 14.30 14 .30 14.30 J-1 0.32 16. 90 11. 63 11. 63 Outlet-1 0.32 16. 94 11. 63 11. 63 Elapsed: 0 minute (s) 3 second (s) Project Title:Unifirst Commercial Laundry Facility Project Engineer:Harold Peterson d:\data4projects\trec0004Wnifirst.stm StormCAD v1.0 10I01197"04:39:49 PM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06706 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 • Outlet- 1 • • P-2 • •, H - i i1 I P- 1 / DET- 1 Project Title:Unifirst Commercial Laundry Facility Project Engineer:Harold Peterson d:data\projects\trec0004\unifirst.stm StormCAD v1.0 10/02/97 07:48:07 AM Haestad Methods.Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 067013 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 • 1:ombined Pipe/Node Report • Pipe Upstream Downstream Length Inlet Inlet Inlet .Total Inlet Section Capacity Average Upstream Downstream Constructed Node Node (ft) Area C CA CA Discharge Size (cfs) Velocity Invert Invert Slope (acres) (acres) (acres) (cfs) (ft/s) Elevation Elevation (ft/ft) (ft) (ft) P-1 DET-1 J-1 40.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12 inch 11.27 1.35 14.30 10.30 0.100000 P-2 J-1 Outlet-1 78.00 N/A N/A N/A 0.00 N/A 24 inch 16.00 0.13 10.30 9.91 0.005000 • Project Title:Unifirst Commercial Laundry Facility Project Engineer:Harold Peterson d:data\projects\trec0004\unifirst.stm StormCAD v1.0 10/02/97 07:47:24 AM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755.1666 Page 1 of 1 • Beginnir 7alculation Cycle Discharge: 0.89 cfs at noc )ET-2 Discharge: 0.89 cfs at node J-2 Discharge: 0.89 cfs at node J-3 Discharge: 0.89 cfs at node J-4 Discharge: 0.89 cfs at node Outlet Beginning iteration 1 Discharge: 0.89 cfs at node DET-2 Discharge: 0.89 cfs at node J-2 Discharge: 0.89 cfs at node J-3 Discharge: 0.89 cfs at node J-4 Discharge: 0.89 cfs at node Outlet Discharge Convergence Achieved in 1 iterations: relative error: 0.0 ** Warning: Design constraints not met. ** Problem: Flooding in system Warning: No Duration data exists in IDF Table Information: Outlet Known flow propogated from upstream junctions. Information: P-7 Surcharged condition Violation: P-7 does not meet minimum velocity constraint. Information: J-4 Known flow propogated from upstream junctions. Information: P-5 Surcharged condition Violation: P-5 does not meet minimum velocity constraint. Information: J-3 Known flow propogated from upstream junctions. Violation: P-4 does not meet minimum cover constraint at upstream end. Information: J-2 Known flow propagated from upstream junctions. Violation: P-3 does not meet minimum cover constraint at downstream end. Information: DET-2 Flooding condition. Calculations Complete • ** Analysis Options ** Friction method: Manning's Formula HGL Convergence Test: 0.001000 Maximum Network Traversals: 5 Number of Pipe Profile Steps: 5 Discharge Convergence Test: 0.001000 Maximum Design Passes: 3 Network Quick View Hydraulic Grade I • Label I Length I Size I Discharge I Upstream I Downstream I P-3 155.00 12 inch 0.89 15.40 12.48 P-4 100.00 12 inch 0.89 12.48 11.54 P-5 18 .00 12 inch 0.89 11.54 11.53 P-7 60.00 15 inch 0.89 11.53 11.52 Elevations Label I Discharge I Ground I Upstream HGL I Downstream HGL I DET-2 0.89 15.00 15.00 15.00 J-2 0.89 16.50 12.48 12.48 J-3 0.89 16.10 11.54 11.54 Outlet 0.89 16. 94 11:52 11.52 J-4 • 0.89 16.14 11.53 11.53 Elapsed: 0 minute (s) 4 second(s) Project Title:Unifirst Project Engineer:Harold Peterson d:\haestadlstmc uni.stm StormCAD v1.0 10101f97 05:11:09 PM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06706 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 o Outlet P-7 J-4 k4, P-5 J-3 P-4 P-3 DET-2 Project Title:Unifirst Project Engineer:Harold Peterson d:lhaestadlstmthini.stm StormCAD v1.0 10/02/97 07:46:06 AM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 ;ombined Pipe/Node Report Pipe Upstream Downstream Length Inlet Inlet Inlet Total Inlet Section Capacity Average Upstream Downstream Constructed Node Node (ft) Area C CA CA Discharge Size (cfs) Velocity Invert Invert Slope (acres) (acres) (acres) (cfs) (ft/s) Elevation Elevation (Mt) P-3 DET-2 J-2 155.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12 inch 4.89 3.08 15.00 12.08 0.018839 P-4 J-2 J-3 100.00 N/A N/A N/A 0.00 N/A 12 inch 4.90 2.11 12.08 10.19 0.018900 P-5 J-3 J-4 18.00 N/A N/A N/A 0.00 N/A 12 inch 2.52 1.13 10.19 10.10 0.005000 P-7 J-4 Outlet 60.00 N/A N/A NIA 0.00 N/A 15 inch 4.57 0.73 10.10 9.80 0.005000 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Project Title:Unifirst Project Engineer:Harold Peterson dAhaestad\stmc uni.stm StormCAD v1.0 10/02197 07:44:47 AM Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 O **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9706732 Amount: 2, 003 .52 10/21/97 14 : 04 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #8810 POWELL DEV Init: LMN Project # : LUA97-159 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Total Fees: 2 , 003 .52 This Payment 2 , 003 . 52 Total ALL Pmts : 2 , 003 . 52 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81. 00 . 0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 1, 000 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 . 345 . 81. 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 500 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 3 .52 \ q� - ISgS � GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Commercial Laundry Facility 3600 Block of Lind Avenue Renton, Washington Project No. T-3707 Terra Associates, Inc. Prepared for: UniFirst Corporation cio Treece and Company Kirkland, Washington August 15, 1997 RECEIVE! OCT 2 ? 1997 JEV1 L. r ivr „wiVlfVi CITY OF RENTON ` '` TERRA ASSOCIATES. 45 .. Consultants in GeotechnicalGeology''Engineering,Geolo ' I ........,.., 'a°'�. . . Environmental Earth Sciences ' August 15;'1997 { • Project No.T-3.707 = • Ili Mr. Gar.),Bigelow, • UniFirst Corporation , , , c/o Mr. Bart Treece Treece and Company 320-2nd Avenue'South_ Kirkland, Washington. 98.033, - Subject: .Geotechnical Report ; • `Commercial Laundry Facility; • • • 3600 Block of Lind Avenue • . • Renton, Washington- Dear Mr. Bigelow: • . As'requested, we have conducted_a-geotechnical.:engineering'study.for. 'th'e subject project' The site i,s'. • • underlain by foui and one-half to seven feet of loose to medium dense granular fill .overlying three to : five feet of organic clayey:silt'or silty clay: The silty clay stratum is underlain by medium dense to idense; alluvial sands.'. We observed groundwater at•depth's ranging from 2.5 .to. 6.5 feet below site ' • (grades. ,Building sites in the Green River valley'are.often surcharged•with fill, additional to that required for , raising site grades to preconsolidate compressible soils, and limit post,'construction'building settlement. Based on soil conditions we observed, we recommendsurcharging:•the building site with an additional fill.thickness of two feet above that required to achieve planned building elevations.'" Once monitoring,' . • indicates settlements are completed under'.the weight' of the surcharge fill, ,the building'may; be constructed using a conventional 'spread footing foundation placed on competent fill soils. • , II_ • - 12525 Willows Road,Suite 101,:Ki"rkland,,Washington.98034 • Phone (425) 821-7777 ' Mr. Gary Bigelow August 15, 1997 II , The:attached report describes our exploration and explains our recommendations in,greater detail. We trust this information is sufficient for your present needs. Please call if you have any questions or need ' additional information. Sincerely yours, • TERRA ASSOCIATES,,INC. 11m18Kevin P. Roberts,P..,'' 4 �-c ,.' ,, •. Project E ,ineer " ,1 a : 1 ----)/ i P-;Z'i .., •• 1:.. • tri .' ,-- Q , , heodore J. Sche ,e`- �`;oo 4v' ', Principal Engineer „,. ��orl KPR/TJS:ts 'EXPIRES 6:18J i`°►C 1 I _ I j �I . I ' - _ , I . Project No. T-3707 Page No. ii , • l. TABLE.OF CONTENTS % ' . .. •- . .. . . , ' Page = • 1.0. Project Description -1 2.0 Scope'of Work:' 1 3.0 Site Conditions . . 2 • - • 3.1 Surface' . 2 3.2 Soils 2 . 3.3 Groundwater 2 3`.4 Seismic Considerations ' • • 3 4.0 • Discussion and Recommendations - • 4 �,. . 4.1 General 4 _ 4.2.,' Site preparation and Grading, 4 4.3 Surcharge" 5 414 Spread Footing Foundations - 6 iL • . 4:5 Slab-on-grade Floors • 6 4.6 Excavations 4:7 Utilities ' = 7. , .4.8 ,Lateral Earth Pressures, ,. 8 -4.9 Drainage 8 4.10 Pavements 9. 5.0- . Additional Services ... 9' • 6,.0 Limitations , 10' . ,.� Figures, , .. .. . _ - „ - •f. .. Vicinity Map Figure 1 , Exploration Location Plan Figure'2 Typical.Settlement Marker Detail • Figure 3 Appendix „ , Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing Appendix A. • ' Geotechnical Report Commercial Laundry Facility ; 3600 Block of.Lind Avenue Renton; Washington shin ton 1.0 - PROJECT.DESCRIPTION. The project will consist of the'construction of a laundry facility in Renton,Washington. The location of II the project site is shown on the Vicinity Map,Figure'1. `Review of a site plan Sheet SP1,•dated June,.6,•,1997', prepared by J. Raymond Berry;Architect, shows the construction of a;40,000 square-foot building within the central portion of the property. Parking - 11, areas will.be located adjacent to the northern'and southern margins of the facility. The;building._and -- I,parking areas will be accessed from entrances off of Lind Avenue,and an ingress arid'egress easement located along the:northern property line. Wetland and stormwater detention areas"will'be constructed :"along the eastern and southern property margins, and at the northeastern corner of the Site grades ' ,, will be raised two to four feet in building and parking areas. . ' The structure will be of metal frame construction; with slab-on-grade floors:..Though building loads are not available to us at this time, we expect theywill be two tothree.ki sper lineal footalon walls, and . P P along i 50 to 80 kips for interior;columns:..Floor loads of approximately.150 pounds per square foot (psf:),are:. also anticipated: We understand'heavier concentrated floor loads•may be transferred through.the .,framing of the structure to the foundation system..:.'" I The recommendations in the following sections of this report are based,on our understanding of the' project's design features. We should review,final'design drawings and specifications to verify that our r recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated into project:design and construction: . , 12.0 SCOPE OF WORK • !On July 17, 1'997, we,drilled three test borings at the site, each to a depth'of 29 feet below existing site I grades. g the information obtained from the subsurface.exp loration we -. erformed analyses to b Using . . P p Y 'develo ',geotechnical recommendations;for project design and construction.. Specifically, this report '~ iaddresses the following: : • Soil•and,groundwater conditions. , • Site preparation and grading• Surcharge fill and settlements. ,• - Spread footing foundations ' • Soil liquefaction', ill. - •J r August.12;'1997 Project No.T-3707 • Lateral earth pressures. . " • Slab-on-grade floors" _ Excavations • II` • Utilities Pavements • Drainage . • it 3.0 , SITE CONDITIONS • If_ 3.1 Surface I The subject site is located on the.eastern side of the 3600 block of Lind Avenue.in Renton,"Washington. This location is shown,on.Figure.1. The site;is bounded to the south by_undeveloped.property.and Lind Avenue to the west. At the time of our visit, a machinery rental facility was under construction.adjacent 11 to the northern site boundary. A Home Base retail store bounds the site to the east.: The site and vicinity are flat. An,existing railroad spur track-extends along the northern property:line, • within a 30-foot wide railroad easement. ,We noted that the track was raised slightly above'surrounding grades. It appeared that recent grading consisting of the placement of a thin 'layer of;newer-fill' over. - older fill had occurred over some portions of the,site. The maximum thickness•of the newer fill was approximately.12 to 18 inches where placed within a small area located�at the northeastern portion of - II the site. An existing stormwater detention facility lies-Within a wetland and detention easement at the property's eastern.margin: No'standing water was noted within the detention area at the time; of our site visit. Storthwater drainage'from adjacent Lind Avenue is directed to storm drains along curbs and gutters: 'The majority'of,the site,•,within its central 'portion, contained no vegetation. Cattails; reeds;' arid'tall ' grasses were',growing in:the:eastern detention facility area. Small shrubs and berry brambles were located along the western margin of site adjacent to Lind Avenue.•. .3.2 ,• Soil's' • { Each boring showed fill soil comprised of silty medium sand,'.and medium sand with silt to depths ' ranging from 4.5 feet in.Test Boring B-2 to seven feet in Test Boring B-1. This material was medium I dense in its upper portion and became loose with depth. Compressible'native soils consisting of very soft to medium stiff organic clayey silt and silty,'clay were found underlying the fill soils ' These soils I contained varying amounts'..of organics comprised mainly'of wood fragments and Peat:; The organic silty clay layer was approximately three feet thick at the location,of Test Boring B-i, increasing to five-. ' . ., I:feet in thickness at the_location of Test Boring Page No:2 August 12, 1997. ` Project No.•T-3701 Interbeds of dark brown to black fine to Medium- rained sand, sand with silt, and silty sand were found ' underlying the organic silty; clay'and clayey silt layers. The sands..and silty sands' were generally medium dense and became dense to very dense with depth. Each of the borings were terminated within I dense to very dense horizons of sand or sand with silt: ' - • The Geologic Map'of the Renton Quadrangle,..King County, Washington, by D.R. Mullineaux (1965), - shows that the soils are mapped as peat.(Qlp). The native soils underlying the fill'•appear to correlate , I better with the published description of alluvium,(Qaw), mapped approximately one-half mile west of the site'. The map indicates this soil unit is up to 50 feet thick and primarily consists of clayey silt arid - fine sand within its upper portion. .: • Figures A-2 through A-4 in Appendix,A present more detailed descriptions of the=subsurface conditions encountered in the test.borings. The approximate test boring locations are shown on Figure 2. . . • 3.3 Groundwater, • ' .. We encountered groundwater in each of.the test borings at:depths.ranging'from 2:5 feet in Test Boring B-3 to 6.5-feet in Test Boring B-2. Groundwater levels observed during our investigation'are indicative of'mid-summer hydrogeologic conditions. Increased precipitation levels will result in higher groundwater levels.-during the winter and early spring months. Seismic,,Considerations 'The Puget Sound area falls withinSeism'ic Zone 3 as Classified'by the Uniform Building Code (UBC):. - IBased on the soil encountered and the local geology, Table 16-J of the 1994 UBCindicates.a . . , (site coefficient of 1.5 should be used in design of the structure. , Soil Liquefaction Ve reviewed the;results•of our field and._laboratory testing and assessed the potential,for liquefaction of , the,site's soils during an earthquake We conducted our analysis using methods outlined-in Ground Motions, and Soil Liquefaction During'Earthquakes,''by Seed and' Idr.iss (1982), Liquefaction is:.a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of Soil strength due to an:increase in pore.water. , ` pressure induced by vibrations from a seismic event. r Analysis indicates an approximately five-foot thick layer of'medium dense silty sand, observed in Test • Boring B-2 at a depth,,of 12 feet, would,probably liquefy under severe earthquake ground motions`and . moderate ground:shaking of significant duration. We do not believe building,foundations would be subject to a bearing capacity failure. However, building settlements of up-.to 1.5 inches may result upon. • dissipation of excess pore pressures generated during the seismic event: -- August 12, 1997.. Project No. T-3707 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 General ' '.. Based on our study, there are no "geotechnical constraints that would preclude construction of the proposed facility. The test borings indicate that a three to five-foot thick layer of organic clayey silt and , silty clay underlies existing surface fills at the site.The thickest portions of the compressible stratum are located in the southeastern corner•of the, building location.' The organic silty 'clay.is underlain by," competent silty sands and sands deposited by the Green River., , At a minimum, the site should be surcharged with two feet of additional ,fill:above that, placed and compacted to achieve final construction grade. The surcharge will;compress the organic.silty clay layer - and reduce potential,post construction'settlements;that could impact the structure., ,Construction of the building may commence once monitoring shows that primary settlements are completed under the `weight of the.surcharge.. Due to'the relatively light expected building loads; and relatively settlement , tolerant metal-frame construction, we believe the structure may be supported on a conventional.spread footing foundation placed on competent fill soils: , The following .sections provide detailed recommendations regarding the above issue's and other geotechnical design considerations. These recommendations should be incorporated into the final -- design drawings and construction specifications.' . 4.2 Site Preparation and Grading Following clearing, the fill surface should be proofrolled'with heavy construction equipment,prior to placement of.additional fill., Soft yielding areas should be overexcavated to firm bearing soil arid replaced with structural, fill. :Where excavations to achieve' firm conditions are excessive, use, of-a : ' geotextile fabric such as Mirafi 500X'in,conjunction with limited overexcavation and replacement.with ' - ,a structural fill may be considered. Typically, 18 inches-of clean granularstructural fill over the fabric , ` will achieve a stable'subgrade. , Our laboratory test,results show'that the,existing fill was a few percentage points above its optimum moisture content at the time of our investigation; and that some of,the fill contains up to 13 percent .., fines. These soils may be difficult to compact if the moisture conditions cannot be Carefully controlled. • Care should be taken to ensure that exposed surfaces"of-the on-site fill do not..become disturbed by construction traffic during wet weather conditions. • . Because of their,moisture sensitivity, the ability to use these soils as structural fill will depend on their moisture content and the prevailing'weather conditions at the time of construction: It will be difficult to ' achieve proper compaction of these soils when their:moisture content is above optimum: When the , Moisture is excessive, the soil-can be dried by aeration to a moisture content which will,allow for proper . ' " compaction. When properly moisture c'onditioned, it is our opinion that"the existing fills can be'used for, - fill below footings, pavements,and building floor slabs. -Page No.4 • August 12,:.1`997' Project No.T=3707 We recommend that imported structural fill required to achieve site,grades consist of inorganic granular , ! 'soil meeting the•following:grading,requirements:'- - -, - - ,Maximum Aggregate Size '3 inches Maximum passing the No:4;Sieve, 75 percent : Maximum Passing :,the " No. '200 ..Sieve. ; . 25.percent r (Based"on the Minus 3/4-inch Fraction) (see following narrative),: If fill placement takes place:during wet weather or if the'moisture conditions-of the fill material.cannot , be controlled,we recommend importing,fill soil-that conforms with the above gradation, but-with the maximum passing the::No. 200'sieve'reduced to five percent. - • - Structural 'fill materials should be -placed in 'uniform loose layers not.exceeding'12. inches. and compacted to' a minimum of 95, percent of the soil's maximum density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-698 (Standard`Proctor). The moisture content of the soil at the time of,compaction should be within about two percent of its optimum;as determined by_this ASTM.method. . • •- '!Prior to constructing foundations'and floor slabs, we recommend'probing or'proofroliing the subgrade' • to determine if.any:-isolated soft, and yielding areas are present. Soft 'Or yielding areas•should be overexcavated and filled to,grade with structural fill or crushed rock. - , - 4.3Surcharge ,We 'recommend implementing 'a surcharge, program at the site to induce .primary settlements in the compressible stratum:; This'will involve placing an additional two feet of fill across the building pad 1 above that required to achieve desired grades.' The surcharge fill:should extend a minimum,distance of five.feet beyond the building perimeter: The surcharge fill does not need:to meet.the recommendations for structural fill as discussed.above, but should be'compacted to exhibit a minimum unit:.weight of-120; _ pounds per cubic foot"(pcf). It is advisable, however, to use a material of structural fill quality so that it can be'used,for grading in other areas of the'site,wh• en removed.' A:monitoring program shOuld be implemented to verify completion'of expected settlements..Building: construction nay begin when monitoring,.indicates that fill:and surcharge-induced settlements are ' completed: Analysis indicates.total primary settlements of about three-to five inches are expected;to occur. within'_ - approYimately si'x:to eight weeks following fill placement. Post' construction building settlements' • - should be less than one inch total and one half inch differential. • • • Page No. 5' ; _ - August 12, 1997 Project No;T-3707. is • To-verify the amount of settlement and the rate of movement,.the surcharge program should 'be monitored,by installing settlement markers: A-typical settlement marker installation is shown on Figure 3. The'settlement.markers should:be installed on the existing grade before placing any building fill. Once installed,,elevations 'of both the,,fill height and marker should be.recorded daily:until the. full height of the surcharge is in place: Once filled to grade, readings should continue weekly until the , anticipated settlements have occurred. • It is critical that the grading contractor recognizes the importance:of the settlement marker installations. ! All efforts must be made'to protect;the'markers from damage during fill placement.` This difficult,'if not ` impossible, to evaluate the progress of the surcharge program if the markers are damaged or destroyed, • i by construction equipment. -'Therefore, it may be necessary to install new markers and to,extend_.the ' _monitoring time to ensure that settlements have ceased and building construction can begin:. 4.4 Spread.Footing Foundations`. _ a on . be u� orted " surcharge program, the -buildin•, ma` '� s ,. Followingthe successful ;com letion of the ,,.. , y- _ � P. P b gPP I conventional spread footing-foundations bearing on the existing fill,-or pew'structural fill placed and compacted as recommended in.the Site`Grading and Preparation-section. A minimum thickness of three feet of existing.compacted fill or .structural -fill should -be present below the footing construction. • . Perimeter foundations exposed to the weather should be at a ''minimum depth of 1,5 feet below final exterior grades.: We.recommend designing foundations,for,a net allowable bearing capacity of 2,500 psf, For short-term : 1 Toads, such as wind"and seismic,.a 113 increase in this allowable.capacity can be used., For designing,foundations to resist lateral loads, abase friction coefficient of 0.4 can be used'in,design of the structures: Passive earth pressures acting on the:side of the footing and buried portion of the - foundation stem wall cap.also be considered for resisting lateral loads. We recommend calculating this lateral' resistance using an equivalent fluid weight,'of 350.pcf., Atperimeter- locations, we recommend not including the upper 12.inches.of soil in this computation because they can be affected by weather or , disturbed by future grading activity.:This value assumes:the foundation will be constructed neat against competent fill soil or backfilled with structural fill as described in the Site Preparation and.Grading :section. The recommended lateral resistance-,value.includes a safety factor of 1.5'. . ' 4.5 Slab-on-grade.Floors With site preparation completed as.described in the Site Preparation.and Grading section, new structural fill soils should,be suitable for.supporting;slab-on-grade.construction. For slab thickness, design with 'respect to floor deflection'due to point loadings; a subgrade modulus of300 pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used: Page No. 6 , August 12, 1997. Project No.•T-3707 An allowance should be'made,immediately below the floor slabs.for. placing.a capillary break, layer,: ' consisting of,four-inches of clean, free-draining sand.or,gravel which has less'than three percent,by weight of material passing the No.200 sieve. This layer will guard against:wetting of the floor slab due , to the underlying soil conditions. ; . Where moisture via vapor transmission is not desired, a polyethylene vapor barrier should be placed on , the capillary`break layer: To aid in uniform curing of the concrete, we recommend placing two inches. of clean,uniform sand on,the vapor barrier. Some post-construction primary:settlements will occur as the building floor loads'further;coinpress the organic silty clay, layer. Based on an assumed slab loading of 150 psf, we estimate that slab settlements • of about one half inch may occur: 4.6 ,Excavations • Excavations greater than four-feet deep will'need to.be-completed in accordance with local, state, or • , federal regulations. According to the Occupational. Safety :and_ Health Administration .'(OSHA), inorganic,soils encountered at the site would be classifies as GroupC:soils. Accordingly, excavations - made within the native soils or fill at the site that are greater than four feet, but'not exceeding 20 feet deep,will need to be laid back with side slope gradients of 1.5:1., As another option,•a trench shoring box to'support excavations throughout the lower depth may be used in conjunction with sloping of the .upper-portion-of•the excavation as outlined above., -Because of, " groundwater seepage within the upper:fills, temporary dewatering of the excavation may.need to be • 1 considered where excavation depths exceed two to three feet below existing site:grade. .Excavations below depths.of seven feet.will likely encounter the regional groundwater table and require more I intensive dewatering efforts to maintain trench stability. - - • • ' The above information'is provided solely for the benefit of the owner and other design consultants, and should not be construed to imply that Terra Associates,Inc. assumes responsibility for job site safety. it is understood that job site safety is-the sole responsibility of the projectcontractor:, 14.7 ' Utilities • We recommend that,all site utilities be bedded'and.backfilled in-accordance with applicable American • . •Public Works Association (APWA) specifications. For site utilities within City right-of-way, bedding and backfill should be,completed-in accordance with City of Renton specifications. „At a-minimum, • Futility',trench,backfill:should be placed and compacted in accordance with recommendations presented • the Site Preparation and Grading section. :Where utilities occur below unimproved areas, the degree 'of compaction can be reduced to a minimum:of 90 percent of the soil's maximum density as determined by the referenced ASTM standard. Because of the potential for lon term settlements, utility pipe joints and:connections should be flexible, allowing for'up to one.inch of differential movement.. Page No. 7 August 12,'1997 Project No.T-3707 • 4.8 Lateral Pressures The magnitude of earth pressure development on retaining walls.will partly depend on the.quality of backfill: Where fill is'placed behind retaining walls, we recommend placing and compacting it as structural fill: To guard against the buildup of hydrostatic:pressure,wall drainage must also be installed as_discussed in the Drainage section. With granular backfill placed and compacted as recommended sand drainage properly installed, we recommend designing restrained walls for an at-rest earth pressure equivalent to•a fluid'weighing 50 pcf. A value of 35:pcf'may be used where the wall is unrestrained. These values do not include other , surcharge,loading such as from fill.backslopes or‘adjacent'.footings that may act on the.wall._',If such ' ; conditions will exist;'the imposed loading must be included;in the wall design. :Friction at the base of : i foundations and;passive earth pressure will provide resistance to these lateral loads.. Values for these • -_ parameters are provided in the Foundations section: .. 4.9 Drainage . Surface. • Final exterior grades should'promote-free and positive drainage away from,the building'areas at all. times.- Water must not be allowed to.,pond or collect adjacent to foundations'or within the immediate building area. We recommend:providing a gradient of at least three percent for a minimum distance of ten feet from the building perimeter, except.in paved locations. In paved locations, a minimum gradient of one percent should.be provided,unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structure. ; • L.Subsurface Provided final exterior grades promote free and positive drainage away from the building.perimeter, we [do not believe it will be necessary to install foundation drains where pavements will be constructed,up • Ito the'building. : We recommend installing a continuous drain'along the outside'lower edge of the, buildings' perimeter foundations in landscape areas. The foundation drains and:roof,downspouts. (should be tightlined separately to an approved discharge facility'. Subsurface'drains rtnist be laid•with a' gradient sufficient to promote positive flow to a controlled point of approved discharge. To guard against hydrostatic pressure development on retaining walls, drainage must.,be installed. .We _ • recommend that wall drainage-consist of a minimum, 12-inch thick layer'of washed rock or pea gravel placed adjacent to the wall. A four-.inch diameter perforated pipe should be placed on a bed of gravel at the base of the-wall footing and gravel drainage cohimn. The pipe;should be directed;toga suitable . outlet. Page No. 8 .. August 122, 1997 ' • Project No. T-3707 • 4.10 Pavements:.. , With subgrade soils prepared'as described in the Site Preparation and,Grading section, suitable:support for pavement construction should be provided. However, regardless of the compaction results obtained, s"ubgrades must be in a stable non-yielding condition'prior to'.paving. .Immediately prior to paving, the : area of the subgrade should:be proofrolled"with heavy construction equipment to verify this condition. The required pavement thickness is not only dependent upon the supporting capability of the subgrade, , . • soils, but also on the traffic loading,conditions which will be applied. For light commercial vehicles and , , typical passenger vehicle traffic;'the following pavement sections are recommended:.: • , •, Two inches of asphalt concrete(AC)over six,inches of crushed rock base(CRB) • Two inches of AC over four inches,of asphalt treated base(ATB) For heavy truck traffic.areas,we.recomniend the following pavement sections: • • is • Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB- . • I. • Three inches of AC over four,inches of ATB • 1 If there-`is'.a potential that pavement construction will be delayed until the wet winter months, :.the subgrade soils must consist of a clean granular material as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section. 'In addition, we strongly.suggest that the subgrade be further-protected by placing a'.layer of ATB, on:which construction'traffic could access the project without excessively disturbing the subgrade soils. The ATB thickness.:for this purpose should be four inches. Repair of failed ATB areas should be ianticipated prior to final-paving: However, the, overall integrity of, the subgrade soils Will be , - iconsiderably lessimpacted if this protection is provided. - . ' : . Over time,some longitudinal_and transverse cracking of the pavement should be expected. Cracks in, , the pavement should be sealed i'n.a timely fashion to prevent excessive surface water infiltration into the - subgrade sails and degrading,their supporting capabilities. II 5.0.0 ADDITLONAL SERVICES " Terra Associates;Inc. should review the final design and specifications in order to verify that earthwork .' and foundation recommendations have been'"properly interpreted and incorporated into the. project ;design and'construction. We;should also provide,geotechnical services during construction in order to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications, and recommendations: This will:also'- ' allow for design changes if subsurface conditions'differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction.. Page No. g August,l2, 1997 - " Project No:.T-3707 • 6.0_ LIMITATIONS . We preparedthis report in accordance with generally accepted.geotechnical engineering practices:. This report is, the property. of Terra Associates, Inc and:is intended fore specific applications to the. _ ' _ Commercial Laundry Facility project Renton, Washington.. This report is-for'the,exclusive use of UniFirst Corporation, Treece.and Company, and their authorized representatives. No other warranty, • j expressed or implied, is made. .: : ' • i .The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based upon data obtained from'the test borings drilled on-site Variations in soil conditions can occur,:the nature-and"extent of which may not • become',evident',until construction. :If variations. appear evident, Terra,A'ssociates,. Inc. should be requested to reevaluate'the recommendations in this report prior to,proceeding With:construction: • is - - •, , • ' Page No. 10 . ; • • _ _ , o,,T—f . _ ss n..mn t 'c.u'.,uut r`�1`�1-u/.�. 22t_I .rd;,' —-- ---- - - O -4 IIr o -�::n. - 4y '1i.:.` ^/iu�.•1"" �•a io,a. ">S AY•GHltll lnxu',r, `gi n Alf,uul lii�„ ,.,-1 '- �r n6T• -...- • - �i. Nall , --a G �' 5 ssir`iin _ - - - W i 1'�tr, •' '^�' ...n; �� ,'�n j_ ! „I5 'a �CZ G: . f- � FM6 '.S - ksl 155, ' � �l5'rxsoll' x d!1 • luoll ' •3S YA H160I "tearJlf� i y. J .,.,., F. - - _ O> ,J AaS,Ty{ ..'t'.:.N,,: L. �•' NI j�- lsnrlucol •� d ��der ',If r,!„ ", 4, :SE •.,, _ ..S 1!SSeor', '1flu - 3S AV G' , .1 - - 1IwIA'P 0, W S .0 o-3s 4Y iuoi `,.t.± . ',11 Vr �I.a+ gi,,.P 1'siS a ,L+' ,n ,n _,n.QQIt� N Q Li_ •57101'- ` i; ,'t�aE'• Y'ri �;.,-I 1 M• o. _ w • ���rrr .. • S is:.' OpgPi:..•.a }4r I e{] N e 3S i G '�' N'AVW HL8 - HO1H•• 100 •{t'l�,7,'M1;,%111W9 t�:)•rii.:, I';,:iK _ _ b` y is der 00 ' -� 7S AY II1S0l-w- i` .0 _ 7S 7d Ill-1,� xuol - .,I� '.1('1 ,.f,r,,�,.,'_':.' `'4i.f.:r''f'•'.:;•:r l .,.,N - ,\• J1:13.=, 75 1d ----- is ,5C s I •'•, ' h :: T,.::: .'. '�_� �^ 7. P� d xlsol • W 1'.i:,-Ti i',"•S,. `s ^- ,-,9 W 3$ "AY = Hist I _ H1501 •L - ),-1p610 s -T,-'A:Nnrool-„"-„v; 15 n lu ni - z • . .,. ^'sLTI:�/��',~t 8.. _ _ _ ,I N is;.,nrnlso, t; .N.- L:� r p - Q. 1 I YOI -35 AY tl1977 - — - ,n'✓ s` '� -.-'-7S-AV-H1501 -____ _ _ - C +'.•'�'' 1' - -d®:,..^�lp - .x,2'•:'t',n,/ p ti 'S - ••dd' -- -- - • �I •,•-1r1_ qI IS AY xliu --- L 1 ..,y ,/". - j�7.'-,0 ,,� AV - 't. 3S I -J- 1 NI,, JS LI III>UI Q. D<c f, 4• ;:'� ti•: w/(rrr .. G. `G ::�.�: •• AY IIIN' SAY�7I� v�ao�`` N i .1" Q ENSONjai s'1'tis;-+S' • 'S n h' S173A i _ r 3S'lid mci,i Q B v ' I� N a � -- 'G o i 1,�Y.i s- • -fg1' - _ i 3s• nv[�.. I;?`. '4 "I __3S -aid - u ezol of _ E' S AV I11IA She $ : Y.i! ,.',' - ',., . I. ..•f _ K - (1 (. a 1^ 1J .Z a ,t1 !!:t S r' ti'J�' rn 1.11H. . d `J,.•rfs r1'�:. 4Q^•` ''Sa., - I ';o .. _ I N n' - 'is e, • — _ .V' ., ,i� la +y, t.l.� � 1`V. 911x.�'SY''.. - _ .I I- -- __ 'CO _ U Z .,_. t 1. ^in. '�c6J.- ,:; bl,� ~' ' THEN$• s_id n A� -- . — rr32�� 01 > Q_ "� t..w. ,\' 1fn. -f c.I .re • nY, 'f. 'i,,.�'"I G �''I,YS I >„I Q, a 3' "TM y'� *ry! A ''itch i5; i7s •• ;'N d r/' S.v.S�+ �i'�I n .:was\_-��'�a r@• • JL. i' �e r • _._� 'd ^l� U�" /+.���/ .S% AY.,SIMUW"M 's',l I� . , !' $' I' r• - _ d i _-'i -,. f2 . X.V^ ';.r..,u, 1f1�}inH Jr�' •, .mo w'..f',; S.1�i /1pp l•7 < - S_'.•••• • r • ,,,WA.•/ r---- , ±AY 11,"6 P A') 1� •11_�. ^:,, :Q;,.' rAp IIISTi� .e7._ h._1... Si VN,• ,!t. t:; �• ��ti. '.," . •n W V '� M� N ", _ 1' c ice.%- �-AVv'S..°„t t .:9af"i"` a,: ".4t',,tt:. ',:s.?. :v`�a 4. .k..,'1,,,•43;` a41-• $` l.f, _-- i- �,:qj �Pj, _I- 4. ^• �y;•"'1 1 ... S .L }`7i:� fZ`•H '�' ` -{%.•L'4:i f,frs,] }f A ,n; i ON.. n , 'S A' 'I,v, �:: :A °. 3x t„.. ts^'!` )' ;t7i: ,■ .�. 1081V1 a�o x . - 1� y��tA j�}; ...0.,:.FRWY,.,q, .b;& ,s.: > ,'<. r ,s,Z' . . Nx 1.. o 's,,i, yi.' g 1. ---..z..._;1:`•41f�t.4z4 }6,.4-...m s' -_S-_ •m._'_r.—',•`,�),:?,.b 14,-.,y ,ii�t:f 5 ..4,... 2� fi:i. 'i. i'-' - v¢: 1;:,[1 ,.�7 �- .- s r _ `s'.:lo r4n,to..1-Q�" ::•.^,w' ,'.. - . �sy• ••.x'.: g - ( 'T'7 . r� �� trl \...x ae[c z �S. 1 _ tJ%. :rY �-:?;'t:• ,••E;"•S�t'ii: li:;zi,,,. �I .. r - ..•r. r. .t' d•i c . v:1',t jYn 3v° � 'r't= P A3llVA i:.+,-s,.;'.=ryri. ;�•,;,,a^ 17f� ,,L..•bN Z • rr® rC �;,;,>'. t}izi ;itt'"i! .`i t to tc.4,;.?,: `' 1 ife s �.r F- t` , :;y- Yw``t• ,:.,`1:A i:;d "q \'ti s':!r: !M:tr: ? ; `°' ii. cliff O .'1. ' � `~..A- r,(d;'!- iil Ih il,f!I,i`' :+..,.,y 11•i.. ' 11r� ?,,;i. 4.•.- _a,.?(,i, 1� d' . a:, l� - Z 7. 1 t.. D06i .:,;.LI MS, ., nv ,� L -.. ",,.�® .^-I AV — 7,i� .=�. —��1V,1--=: --- - ----- - CO . ,G • 2SISAY Q tabk '" •!yr.l;;c3;.+, i': �, ., , •.; IONII 1b -\ y \(yS '•I :x":i-:r, b :rh .i s ;.. i ,. f �. .,. t' ,n .s, J)!., W CI,.t ..yi i+:Ky y, ..• tF:i::Ffn:i•. 1. ,,, ' $__ __ ,.. ,I ,nl S AY HISf I _ •,, ?�:,;-,• j4..S "i57^' ;kylh. i q;te•J?'},::F.i'1'., Is r-�rd'';` ov: I j r, ,l.YI..<"r;ri:i. •>`' y„ p,,R•zi 4- .•; c+,�} :r'';,,,,• ..„,e 1 --Tva.. S - ( , Z co ��_ - 'Sit .•,'."' .,1: •{ir. !� 4'Aflf,+..�! ;AJ. rAt-;?, ;rff • W •r<"�ii•� '.r.' - 'I v -ti - v: ,� AV - NLb_ - . -. V. c iY.r.i tii�';"R �' "s`� 71`:ri R { .�;':.• .r •i;:• /•� 'C 31Od :v dv s�.4}ry J[�,p*.\5{ 't,. Zi Y. ,Y• _ ,;tl> i:l;...,t'.i`;f'' '�N �- '.F r LU . - - + i'. `�:itif��f i r}?/,--;i:2 1.�y. d•$r!•Q,m .S } 'l;•'"" t' ' 6 - C� 1, ' O' 'i. ` :A' 1 0 .y`-},,Pr f'04.t ;'Y1 f 4'•••'�" ', ti>7 4=,n ✓ ;i;.., •.• r-• " ,),- 63 _ , W '''' 1+ _-r- + ,,.tfi,._+'j.� ;�a`,Caxl;',V:42i- r� 9, .t,':::as' ,}, - ' H' - •" 's1�, �.f5, • I .. .. i:�f.��. .j,; :::' ''}.n'' ,,,,,r;i' _ ,y:..:Y.t�. -.,'-1,.-.-.0-`i;1 N N s�nv is{e - C7 �.._ yY gat' :.rr:; :'.tt::S t; :nr,?;c;:ina `.;rRi� n,.. 1 �p_w�a.:.. :;r+t S' .nr Hlo[ _ a .1 1 Z cn •�.- '1i 1:,„.f:,v..,'l::i•,.,,..(,1 , :.,. ,'I :.,..,.'- .nrr". L.I . ._ d I _ Y _ ra'.' .SAY. ;:,re r -,.::f4.a.I''i �I.�x�..i,_.Ze(•- .T„ I n '. I •:ti t N • s`Av N Ijipg � t - — .O IIR t , ��--,- ,'`-' ri` r.}.r,i ;r? , -.4.4 r:=;fls©,, • .,r'-- ;lip,,F ,s Y'�. t 01. •G • •.t ,, s AY ,{ U = ,''y �.Ati'tawt._-11:44 3 ,I 1x '.A.,•_,,e/ S±y:.AY,�;+.H7zipe1r,�' .I,. , .1 1 ems.. . rT-' •. '1 I •i W ,mil .C) a• �e} +�,, `y`' ? t 1 `�`''i*1 s lust W •,2 a'� 'Ttc�.tFX.s.viC 5'r+5�`ti;I ��;,;.) -.., �+yv.. ''^, fs-"° �' a `8 g '. - '�_ r1/ ^ Q -s q--;',,.,.vac.,-zl,,,epolk•t '.A;tI•l L''g. v , 4,, '4`,?t., ,,,,, F �pR�' R LL .V tz.4R •.t} @'i 3,.,. :l;.(5•., 1.,3'3^f• 'r1S-r_� N' •-` jv,' ,i.-e••FilN�5r s" n� �:Y', • ld Hl(( - $ AY H19( �, V .:1' Z'C,t7 y, L• {F•}Ab 1,•I..'i?v5, r. [W CI 'f!' ft l0 �/� c • �A.\� NOSl17YP'?. 7. . R•MtGaRt F41g �p1IfC: N . 'AV 111 . W V/ U !e=• :Z,- `•,t' r, i } - .ia -nisi s__ _r __i ✓-� 761i1 s J6 $.k ? � �, ?S1''•7A/_':tYe • ''t:/.k,--iti:.LL .• 'i . • ..�� s •Q - _ d` (-•: • , 4•r \{. i;e+-i .':f:f l4,y:ar�µY�_i -._f-._.__�-r_ f - - (y-.-+r a�.' ._.-. 0_ N > � L "...i'llairmilir ::73' •EST : li! _ � itg'i\;_ °h' ➢\ n.; '�� i} ' "� • �aAY.:I.. A<-_y� �[1 SAr ':AV GAOL S - AY Z[ • — 's .;i\ Y§:®:I®}:j.13.f' '.,1 N '.:'1,. $ l'.r E'b;`; J,:-. 31 F (.� • _I ___ , $ W 4`�,1 � y' \ , ;,�:t_7�.1' •'� ';::�• .,.� iS ZRY,�- r',t `f,�^r, .s :.' N"_-..� Mi ,n� rif 1 s- -• - ~ • r:..Y!-.�,f... \• �•�\ f ����, ,,� ':e'..r: • pp v ' [ E1 b9 .. - - i-it Riot &, _ /. f .. t 1,.. SHAY rr � 1 PO'ifii �+ �X fi�s#1� - 3' , I ;, :: -o f�:3�; q= t- [:x``�. • >, 'ae •d'u?,'- Iar•o2 I A331 ss 3< �) r;• s+, I :... f % �� �: /� � ----Ivh 1S3M z , TjIn Ir 1 =T . it'}'; • < •Poi.t,i% '`—,L Sys"C #, nrt`1 .�.3�. . o� S m ' 4Ii, &S.� 1� W �✓ �� F o il5 f+ ,iraAQ + 5 :IliaS4,= -3:z,;,'; .� +s� t c#'S Y AV J1 v j • II :`1 w 0 ] jw, :L,1� ��' `'-s. 4S}�>"'• Y • W?S-�y, .. -.., i.....Fn:/...... T N I - I W ,��11 ` �' ip-,.5 '�? �" f:"' - ,sr.7'r. .. .__ \'rl I ._- � T . . J - IJ- ya'� :32;4 §lt �+)AIYd - .$3AOOW' ' .' A'3AI '•_' 5 env„ I W • LIND AVENUE h00''.k•2 .g, ?,63.E4' _ ae- NO2'09'37"E 381;46 's' - -- --- - — _ Et'` 19,4 _ - - - -- ,: �10' TELEPHONE. LANDSCAPE'& JTIUTY'EA St e1EN? - -_T—•_-- 4• I' I 1 o- I'I APPROXIMATE SCALE • - . - � 1 ' � n i1.81' m' a • B - 1 , o LOT 7 _ I I. - �= L Dm I \, - 'LOT • LEGEND:' - , - Q. r11 U.S.RENTALS • 'BSP NO:014 92 i � Z � APPRO iMA1E BORING LOCATION I, ' a �I•r� e l .f I pp I I' I a I 17 \. I` p • \ i \ REFERENCE:_ • , I , , . 1 _ r' \ - SI-T-E='P-L'AAI�PBEeARED BY G.;',RAYMOND. BERRY,;SHEET . • I: N0. SP1,-:DATED.JUNE, 6, .1997. _ B3 I = • �i. WETLAND'AND DE.TENT.ON - _ ir . ,,, i -EL-,,, \ Ni • •L, - EAS M NT , E m r 1 ' . ,. _.''__.,: .... .__ .-.:' - --- N09'S0'09"E '7d5.93'1` - _� ..-- - _ '- •-..- - - - - - .. '�.� � - 1 n \ ^IVETLANDAND . I' . STORMWATER'- ., z'I - - � � - - � , AREA' DETENTIONE 'I 1 , o I (. z ° v i \�. 1 Q I LOT 2 1 1 �: >FARWEST'STEEL BSR NO.014 92 I ` 1 EXISTING HOME BASE ` 1\ i1,640 S.F. III I'. .1 1 - , TERRA COMMERCIAL FACILITY EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN. ' -.--,:- .1.-( ',::' .. . COMM '-RC LAUNDRY "FAO TY. ���\\� RENTON, WASHINGTON ���� ASSOCIATES • ' ' •' otechnical. Consultants, . - Proj. No.3707 iDate AUG. 1997. Figure 2 • 1.' STEEL ROD OTECTIVE SLEEVE._ , . `'HEIGHT-.VARIES .. , - „ - .SURCHARGE (SEE NOTES) ' - .�� .•, - SURCHARGE I •OR .FILL: :'. , " • OR FILL, ' 1i. i• 1... . , - '' N•OT ::TO ' -• . '• . . : ,SCALE NOTES: 1`;° BASE CONSISTS ;OF 1./2" THICK",,; x2 2' •: PLYWOOD,WITH CENTER DRILLED :5/8": DIAMETER .:HOLE: .. 2., BEDDING'MATERIAL,./ ",REQUIRED; SHOULD'.CONSIST• OFf'CLEAN •COARSE �SAND . 3. ;MARKER -ROD•IS'`.1/2.'..DIAMETER-.STEEL ROD TREADED-AT BOTH.'ENDS:. • . . _ - -- '4..;MARKER.,..ROD'IS ATTACHED',IQ 'BASE, BY NUTc'AND WASHER`ON EACH SIDE'OF. "BASE: ,; .. , • . .,'` .. . 5 PROTECTIVE .SLEEVE. SURROUNDING ;MARKER R0)•-SHOULD. CONSIST OF . "2 DIAMETER ,, .:PLASTIC.-PLASTIC-,TUBING: ' -SLEEVE IS-.NOT,ATTACHED 'TO ROD OR,;BASE: ' .' ._- . • • ''•.6. ADDITIONAL. SECTIONS 'OF .STEEL .ROD---.CAN BE CONNECTED. WITH THREADED-COUPLINGS:•'. .;' ; , .., - .7•.- ADDITIONAL .SECTIONS OF ;PLASTIC ,PROTECTIVE : L'EEVE-CAN;`BE CONNECTED•-WITH:'PRESS-•FIT :' ,, PLASTIC 'COUPLINGS.:I 8.;- STEEL.-MARKER' ROD,:SHOULD EXTEND;'AT'LEAST•6"'MOVE-TOP;OF PLASTIC PROTECTIVE SLEEVE: _ , - '9,. :STEEL MARKER ROD:SHOULD, `EXTEND AT_,LEAST 1" .ABOVE•TOP OF_•FILL••SURFACE:-. . .; . TYPICAL. -SETTLEMENT•. MARKER DETAIL„ . • ` ��� TERRA - .COMM.ERCIAL-, LAUNDRY.-•FACILITY . �aQ . • _. '. • RENTON;- WASHINGTON. .:ASSOCIATES . . • , .. . . . . • __ Ge.otechnical Consultants` T.roj. No..'3707 ;.Date :'AUG.. _1997 Figure . .3• APPENDIX'A , FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING - • Commercial Laundry Facility:. Renton,Washington On July 17, 1997, we performed our field exploration using a truck-mounted hollow stem auger. drill • ,;rig. • We explored subsurface'soil arid_groundwater conditions at the site by drilling;three hollow'stem auger test.borings each-to a depth.of 29 feetbelow existing grade,:The test boring locations are shown, • on Figure.2.-The Boring Logs are presented on.Figures A-2 through-A-4. An engineer-from Our office maintained log of each test boring as it'was drilled, classified the,soil conditions encountered,.. and'.obtained ;representative'soil samples, All soil samples,were visually • classified in accordance with.the.Unified Soil Classification System shown.on Figure A-1, Representative soil samples were obtained from the test borings using sampling‘procedures outlined in ' -'- ASTM Test Designation D-1586. The samples were placed iri jars or tubes(ring samples) and taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. 'Dry unit weight determinations,werre made on two. ' of the samples of fine-grained soils: The dry unit weight values are reported on the boring:logs. The• moisture contents of each sample were measured and are also-reported`on the Boring'Logs; 'Grain size. • analyses were'-performed on three of the:samples. The results of the.grain size analyses are presented as Figures A-5 and A=6. • • • • • • • • Project No. T=3707 - , ; LETTER ', ; MAJOR DIVISIONS. • SYMBOL' TYPICAL<DESCRIPTION Clean • . Well-graded'gravels gravel=sand::mixtures, little or.no ` , = GRAVELS, GraVels • GW fines. •., J rn - (less than Poorl r g " g • 5 _ N '•. � ` � 5%`'fines � .,GP° Y-graded ravels, ravel-sand;mixture's, or- co More than• •) no .tines.. • .. ., "" , .' _ • m: Silty gravels,"gravel-sand-silt mixtures,.non-plastic, fraction is GM - � •� > � larger than:'No: z .• ' • 4 sieve • With fines . , E :GC •• Clayey gravels :gravel-sand-clay mixtures, plastic fines. _� D .Sands SW Well=:•,:. = � '. . . . . Clean::, , . :- - • '. . ;(� graded sands,•,gravelly sands, little or no fines: • . `11.1 'z ; , .. less'than:,, _ . , ca , ( ° Poorly-graded:sands•.or gravelly sands, little or no c More than'"' �'S/°'-fines) `:SP , fines.; ' Q 50% of,'coarse': : O. ;. SM Silty sands,. sand-silt mixtures,'non-plastic.:fines, U: 2.... smaller, than • Sands, No. 4 sieve with.:fines SC Clayey,.sands; sand-clay mixtures;'plastic fines, Inorganic silts, rock flour; 'clayey silts with slight 2 o SILTS -AND. CLAYS ML :plasticity..: tea ; — O. •..N , ' CL Inorganicy P Y ( Y) �" c�. clay s of low to medium;" lasticit lean. cla E z N. Liquid limit is less than;50%: W: •o, : ;OL ,• Organic silts-and organic clays of low plasticity. , c ' m , ' ,MH Inorganic silts •elastic a :SILTS AND CLAYS_ LLI 0 CH Inorganic clays`of high plasticity;- fat;clays.` • o 'u) ,Liquid limit is.greater than 50% - : • Organic clays of high plasticity,-` HIGHLY ORGANIC :S"OILS', : PT. • Peat. :. 'DEFINITION 'OF. TERMS AND SYMBOLS . w StandardPen.etration•:' 2 "OUTSLDE DIAMETER S.PL"IT DensityResistance in B . �. lows/Foot I . . . ,. ,. ` '' SPOON SAMPLER . ':.., Very. loose'. :. ", ,0-4' • 2.4":INSIDE.'DIAMETER..:RING. SAMPLER Loose- ' - 4-10: •OR:SHELBY TUBE•SAMPLER : o . . Medium.dense. 10-30;, ; z Dense-.. 30 50 ® WATER'LEVEL (DATE) • • • , • Ti• ''.TORVANE ,READINGS,`.tsf P' ,PENETROETER READING; tsf Standard Penetration ' ' . • P. Consistency Resistance N p DD- DRYDESITY, pounds er cubic foot U Very_ soft, ' '.0=2 _LL,. LIQUID LIMIT,'percent o- Soft 2-4 Medium stiff " _ •4-8 PI' PLASTIC,;INDEX ' • � Stiff` . . =16- • � - cn - N STANDARD•PENETRATION', blows per foot •• - I-'.• , '.,Very stiff'"". ' • Hard. >32 % UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION; SYSTEM ``'�� "TERRA - °,:COMMERCIAL; LAUNDRY .FACILITY - .. RENTO.N WASHINGTON ASSOCIATES ' GeotechnlcalConsulta'nts Proj: No: T-37.07` :',Date'.AUG 1997 Figure A-1 - -Boeing: :No. .B-1 Logged by: `KPR , ` bate: 7/17/97 ' :Approximate Elev. . consistency/' . • • • �: (N) Moisture Soil,'Description,. Relative Depth. .E. Blows/ Content Notes Density. (ft:) in' ft., (%o) , • • Fill;':gray=brown silty,.medium 1Sampled.cuttings' some gravel;•moist: ,(SM) Medium dense , Fill; brown medium.SAND with silt,and some. 18 5.6 gravel, medium dense; moist. ,(SP-SM) - , Becomes water-bearing at 4:5'feet : _ 5 ' Loose - 4. 9.0 Gray organic clayey SILT with peat fibers, _ V soft < 2 . P 0.2b tsf�Y ,72. saturated' low plasticity: �ON ' 0 P Y ( ) - _ - �� PL='32:. Black silty fine.SAND;saturated. (SM) Medium dense PI =23 10 28:1 Black fine.SAND with silt,water-bearing. ' 20 27 0: (SP-SM). Medium dense. _ Black silty fine SAND with interbeds of fine - ' black sand,.water-bearing: (SM/SP) Medium dense 23 20 Black silty fine SAND interbedded with ) , ,layers of black fine to medium sand,water- bense - bearin SM/SP 30 32:0, -25 Three feet of.sand' Black fine to medium SAND,water-bearing. ',heave at,27feet. (SP) Dense 3.5: 26.6 ;Flushed with water. Test boring terminated at 29.feet'. 'Groundwater seepage,encountered at=4.5 feet. Hole,'plugged with,two"bags,of bentonite, _ , , chips mixed with cuttings. , . BORING: LOG. COMMERCIAL:.LAUNDRY.FACILITY' • ;.� TERRA' RENTON, WASHINGTON • ASSOCIATES . ,Geotechnical Consultants : Pto No: :;T3707, Date' AUG':1997 , . 1•, . .Figure A-2 . Boring No. B-2: r. { :Logged by: KPR ; . D'ate: .7/17/97 = Approximate, Elev: Consistency/ • (N) - .Moisture Soil' Description Relative_ . Depth . :E '•. Blows/ .Content- Density (ft ) in ft;' (%) < , Fill;brown fine to,rnedium'SAND with silt and gravel fill cuttings at surface,'moisti - - :Fill'; brown fine to medium SAND'.with:silt• Medium dense - I 24 8.5 . and,some ravel moist'to wet.; SP-SM _ - ' 9 ( ) Dark 'ra brown organic' CLAY — 9 X- silty i 5 •. • �. . - Pp'= 1.0.tsf fractured to 5:5 feet,wet,'low.plasticity.'. Medium stiff 5; 0:25,tsf Gray organic clayey SILT with,peat•fibers, DD=70.5 pcf' saturated; low plasticity (OL) Soft . • LL.=41 , Black silty fine SAND;'saturated. (SM) ' Loose 5 67.3' PL.=,31: _ Dark brown=gray silty very fine-SAND with , — 10 interbeds of non-plastic sandy silt,saturated. _.Medium dense. . 10 27•8 . - (SM/Kr :) ; Dark brown-gray silty,very fine SAND,. saturated. (SM) Medium dense _ • Black•silty fine;SAND, saturated. (SM) Medium dense--_ . . 15 32.5 . ', . , '_- • . _2.O . , , .. ' ,': . ; Drills denser Black-fine•to medium SAND interbedded With layers of.dark gray brown non plastic' Very dense. 53.:.': 27.3 , , .. .sandy;SILT,water-.bearing.':(SP/SM) - _25 Black fine SAND With Silt,-wood fragment.at; - 1.5 feet of sand - 28 feet,wafer=bearing. (SP-SM). :, Dense. - ,''r heave at:27'feet • 4.6 26:7 ,Test boring terminated at 29 feet.,;°Groundwaterseepage,encounter'ed at 6.,5 feet: Hole'plugged.with.two,bags of bentonite chips-mixed with cuttings, ;., BORING LOG_ ' TERRA ' COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY ,4 \ • • RENTON; WASHINGTON: , ASSOCIATES.. Geotechnical.Consultants Proj:. No:':T-3707 Date .AUG '1997 Figure A-3 . Boring .=No. B-3,' _- Logged by: I<PR Date: 7/.1:7/97 , . -Approximate Elev.,,,, Consistency/ n. N ‘.Moisture " ' Soil Description Relative Depth , :E. Blows ws/ .Content' Notes Fill* brown silty fine'SAND with gravel, - _' cuttings at surface;moist.:(SM): , Fill;,,gray silty medium sand with:gravel, . ' Medium.dense _ _. saturated. (SM).;. 17. 14.4. Fill; gray medium SAND with silt and gravel, water-bearing. (SP-SM)" Loose-• 5 _ 8 52.0 • • ' 'Dark brown organic:clayey SILT with peat' Medium stiff : fibers,fractured, saturated:- (OL),' Pp<0.25 tsf Brown, organic"SILT With wood • Very soft 1 94.1 DD. 27.8 pcf fragments'and peat"fibers,wet,low _ ` • plasticity., (OL) , c • As above; but non-plastic. (OL) • Very soft _ 10 == 5 22:6 , Black;silty,fine to medium SAND, saturated (SM).00se _ , Black medium SAND;water bearing. (SP) Dense 34 25:1. • _ Sand heave into • - _:. •auger-at 17 feet: .. _ ... 62 29.4 Flushed with water.' Black'"medium SAND,water-bearing: (SP) ,'. Very dense •. , As above. (SP) Very dense' : ? 10 .. 12.8' ' As above: (SP) Dense :.40... ;32.8'• :.. Test'boring"terminated at 29 feet, Groundwater.seepage encountered:at 2.5•feet: Hole plugged with 2,bags of bentonite chips mixed with cuttings. • .Erroneously high value due:to-heave filling sampler"prior to drive:. BORING :LOG, �:. TERRA COMMERCIAL.LAUNDRY FACILITY: . � RENTON, UVASHINGTON' ; ASSOCIATES`, Geotechn'cal Consultants Proj:. No. -T-3707 Date `AUG .1997• _ .. , , . . _ . Figure A-4` ; 1 : 1 - _ SIEVE; ANALYSIS. -': - HYDROMETER .ANALYSIS, , - SIZE OF OPENING IN• INCHES= 9. NUMBER-OF MESH PER•INCH, U.S. STANDARD GRAIN'SIZE IN' MM _ ,. �\ \\\\ \- - - N - _ pf p pO O' O O' - 'O OOO O O O 'N. O1• 4+ w N- -NA ?Cb'N.CO Oft -la - -O __ -8 _ ,t O. 'O .O Of .p .w _N-- '_ ..r8 W ? :w N`. 2 . 0 _ • 90" 10 cn rn - , _ o C7.: D: c� z . - - ---1!- 60 40 .n o ,m r Z77 m 50. .Z7 . 40 k 60 �-< . . 30 = ' 70' m _ , - ., - - • 80 - J � � _ - m 10 90 ZED p 0 Via;. I ' 1 1 1 l 1 -- rlm 1 '-.i -r I _ =.11 1 1 1 i 1 : .1 •-I- ,•11 11 ..W _:N. ' CO O) '� CA ••N-' -.CO 0 -P w . :N': - �"` " . -' N Y o oo �'w b� i,+ '.•ii., moo• o:.-oo. .o' 000: o 0 0' o'. �:• ,- . � - - -_ - ' w,rn .a. w;..N. -,.. -�o 0 0 0' -,o•_` . .o - _ *.� r?1 oo rn 4' w .N' .GRAIN SIZE IN � MILLIMETERS- •` . • -_ _ Z, COARSE = FINE, COARSE I MEDIUM I.. - FINE• • - - •—7) D. COBBLES LL FINES__ � GRAVEL: SAND ••' _ . . " _ ,-2_ 'ODD , . c_ — Key Boring, or. `Depth USCS. Description . Moisture:.= LL- PL _ r_ Test Pit - (ft.) _ - , Content.- (%) _ 1 `0- - B-1 .. 10:0 SM silty SAND, -' 0 B-2 2.5 SP-SM SAND with..silt and gravel . ' " - ...: SIEVE ANALYSIS r "= : - --„ . , ' .;HYDROMETER: ANALYSIS: ._- ' "" __ - '- SIZE OF'OPENING-IN;INCHES " '-I' NUMBER OF MESH PPER INCH, .U.S.' STANDARD.--. -._ :GRAIN-SIZE IN .MM-... - ' ' , -_p� .N Of •? -cm t1.•, N? 00 N OD 4- :A. " " . eS 0- '- W _'N. 00 - ` - — ..- - -.- - ''i . - - ' -,.- -0-:-...-; -,' -, --:-..-,-.- ' 'fti 90 • 10 30 rrTl Z _ 00: = _ . _ ,r 1 , . 60 yW n m : �• ' _ 30 : 70"GT O ` 20 _ ' . 80.., ' , - -, o .100.. - - �'"� �,� � O. O ... O .-" � - -OD-Off. �.W_ N - �O O •'O O`': _'." p -- GRAIN -:°:SIZE -IN ,MIL"LIMETERS,,,,. =, - _ . , ' - W N,-. ' , . .".COARSE :z :D COBBLES:. GRA�IEL SAND' FINES : z n.cn Key Boring;or .Depth USCS • Description, , ' Maisfuc( LL= PL- ' r- Test;Pit "(ft.)`- .. -- _ - . - ' .- • • .. Content'(%) of - ,, , 0 - ' - ..B=3 - '2:5: - SM _ , silty SAND`with gravel; - • _ _ " • COMMITMENT FOR C' ) ISSUED B� • TITLE INSURANCE T1 Ns &1'IoN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANYTransnation Transnation Title Insurance Company, an Arizona Corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the exceptions and conditions and stipulations shown herein, the Exclusions from Coverage, the Schedule B exceptions, and the conditions and stipulations of the policy or policies requested. (See reverse side of this cover and inside of back cover for printed Exclusions from Coverage and Schedule B exceptions contained in various policy forms.) This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsements and is subject to the Conditions and Stipulations on the back of this cover. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. NOTE: THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THE COMMITMENT, AND A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM (OR FORMS) REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WILL BE FURNISHED PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST. cove TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 91 ,\1\E 4 INSp�y(� By: , CORP0,4 4+ Z. �N f0 President ?1' 014 a SEPT la 1991 ?� Oe\le• OF RAN e ' Attest: / Ck gB110Na 1 Secretary Commitment-WA Cover COMMITMENT CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS • 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien,encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such know- ledge. If the proposed insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien,encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter,the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pur- suant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed insured and such parties included under the definition of insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith, (a)to comply with the requirements hereof, or(b)to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c)to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions,the Conditions and Stipulations,and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The matters listed below each policy form are expressly excluded from the coverage of that policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys'fees or expenses which arise by reason thereof: AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY(10-17-92) and AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD LOAN POLICY(10-17-92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created fees or expenses which arise by reason of: subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) statutory lien for services, labor or material); or(e) resulting in loss or restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy, use, damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of had paid value for the insured mortgage. any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a situated. notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above, except to protection or truth in lending law. the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, 6.Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work Policy. related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7.Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgage insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination;or (c) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not transfer results from the failure: excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date (i)to timely record the instrument of transfer;or of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value (ii)of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value without knowledge. or a judgment or lien creditor. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured c' ,ant prior to the date the a • • . TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ' 14450. N.E. 29TH PLACE BELLEVUE, WA 98007 Prepared for: Transnation No. 866800 Customer Reference : 97-180694 TRANSNATION NAT'L SERVICES Escrow No. . . Seller . . Powell-Orillia ' 1200 6TH AVE. , STE. 1910 Buyer/Borr• er --- . SEATTLE, WA 98101 Ittn: DAVE THOMPSON By t_44,.... For - i• - 4n •t is or•er ca • . • (206 - 6 : :9/1-800-441-7701 JO I Jai ,. , DAVID P. CAMPBELL . or S. lIKLASON • (FAX - (206) 646-8593) • SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: August• 14 , 1997 .at 8 : 00 A.M. 1 . Policy or policies to be issued: Amount • ALTA Owner' s Policy TO BE DETERMINED Premium (SEE. NOTE 2) Standard Policy Tax . Proposed Insured: . TO BE DETERMINED (SEE NOTE 1) • 2 . Title to fee simple estate or interest In said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: .P•OWELL-ORILLIA L.L.C. , a Washington limited liability company ' 3 . . The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows : LOT 7 OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN, A BINDING SITE PLAN, ACCORDING ' TO THE CITY OF RENTON BINDING SITE PLAN RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9206302696,. AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 161 OF PLATS, PAGES 8' THROUGH 11, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,. COUNTY OF KING, STATE .OF . WASHINGTON. . • Order No. 866800 SCHEDULE B REQUIREMENTS. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. EXCEPTIONS . Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Defects; liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment . B . Standard exceptions ..set forth in inside of back cover. Special exceptions: . . 1 . Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW_ Chapter 82 .45 and subsequent amendments thereto. As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is . 0178 . 2 . General Taxes, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent May 1; 2nd half delinquent November 1) Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance 125360-0060-06 1996. $25, 859 . 02 $0 . 00 $25, 859 . 02 1997 $25,497 . 92 $0 . 00 . $25, 497 . 92 The levy code for the property herein described is 2110 for "' 1997 . 3 . Special Taxes - Drainage, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any,, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent May 1; 2nd half delinquent November 1) Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance 125360-0060-06 1996 $164 .35 $0 . 00 $164 . 35 . 1997T - $167. 08 $0 . 00 $167 . 08 4 . Conservation (CON) Service Charge, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any,. after delinquency: (1st half delinquent May 1; 2nd half delinquent November 1) Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance 125360-0060-06 1996 $1.25 • $0 . 00 $1 .25 1997 $1 .25 $0 . 00 ' $1 . 25 Page 2 ' I r-- Order No. 866800 5 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Pacific Northwet Bell Telephone Company PURPOSE: Underground communication cable AREA AFFECTED: Portion of Lots 6, 7 and 12 in block 1; and Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8 in block 2 of Burlington Northern Orilla Industrial Park of Renton I Division I RECORDING NO. : 7905090844 6 . Restrictive covenants imposed by instrument recorded on May 4, 1981, under Recording No. 8105040070 .— 71. ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS, OR OTHER SERVITUDES, if any, disclosed by recorded binding site plan of Burlington Northern, recorded under . Recording. No. 9206302696 ... RIGHTS OR BENEFITS, IF ANY, WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY THE RECORDED DOCUMENT (S) ABOVE AFFECTING LAND OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARY DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A. 8 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation PURPOSE : Railroad purposes AREA AFFECTED: Railroad right-of-way located within the plat RECORDING NO. : 8110210541 (Partial release of easement recorded under Recording No. 9203200273) ---- . . ... i 9 . � EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE : The City of Renton, a municipal corporation PURPOSE : Traffic signal operations and maintenance AREA AFFECTED: as described therein , RECORDING NO. : 9206302701✓ 10 . RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH COVENANTS,. CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: jBETWEEN: Powell-Orillia Associates, a Washington general partnership AND: HCWA Realty Corp. , a Washington corporation IDATED: June 30, 1992 RECORDED: June 30, 1992 ,RECORDING NO. : 9206302702 '- REGARDING: Reciprocal easements and covenants, conditions and restrictions Page 3 • Order No. 866800 First Amendment recorded February 8, 1996 under Recording No. 9602081399 . 11 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: Access over and certain utility • rights AREA AFFECTED: as described therein RECORDING NO. : 9603291895 12 . AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: July 3 , 1996 RECORDING NO. : 9607030996 REGARDING: Indemnification NOTE 1 : Title will be vested in parties yet undisclosed. When title is vested, their title will be subject to matters of record against their names . NOTE 2 : The Company has been asked to issue an owner' s policy without . disclosure of the liability amount . This commitment shall. be effective only when the amount of the policy committed for has been inserted in Schedule A hereof . The forthcoming policy must be issued in an amount at least equal to the full value of the estate insured in accordance with our rating schedule on file in the office of the Washington State Insurance Commissioner. The Company may have further requirements if the undisclosed amount to be insured exceeds the current assessed valuation. NOTE 3 : We are informed that Powell-Orillia L.L. C. is a Limited Liability Company (LLC) . A copy of the duplicate original of the filed LLC Certificate of Formation, the LLC agreement, and all subsequent modifications or amendments must be submitted to the Company for review. NOTE 4 : There may be Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Security interests filed with the Department of Licensing in Olympia affecting personal property, crops or agricultural facilities which are not covered by the policy to issue. NOTE 5 : The above captioned description may be incorrect, because the application for title insurance contained only an address and/or Parcel Number. Prior to closing, all parties to the transaction must verify the legal description. If further changes are necessary, notify the Company well before closing so that those changes can be reviewed. Closing instructions must indicate that the legal description has been reviewed and approved by all parties . Page 4 • Order No. 866800 END OF EXCEPTIONS Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, or electricity. In- the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule . CLE/amh ENCLOSURES : Sketch Vesting Deed . Paragraphs 5-12 Page 5 , N T. I a O In J m I i i o / Lae /, n°"fA ° LOT 8 / LOT I st i e 13 / 12 1 __I - yr L— I3 7t /�PCL. A 4,4 % / . e/ 00 no • - 0 At�� - , ` pD Ir, �� ,R.Oal 87 / . „.•T'.,., t , DO• ••Ne7• 4.7w , e ,, "•- lla.f' --- • E' .cS V 2 ° T C n ^ • (0 " ~' i:.LOT2 r ,O ,1 C 2 h c• Q a�� It IL�0, } L LOT 7 3oa x C.... N A c°Zp Lt 3 NO 'vl _ . '1.^G S W ovs au....a !3/7f O . .l 4, 3 I \.� y ,•4:: W u b �4. ; 1 . r• g. 8 I ,e\ LOT 3 y f ps \\.\ \ 0 0 �p 0.eta'1° �'r4 � = ii `0 w.111 \4�\ \ \ \ •\ . °°tw /.1•'!r�f0 1 S 8 Iw M of- SO !o . (>NB9-OS-OBM + .644 4 4 .4 Jn•:"; NW 31-23-5 This sketch is provided, without charge; for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, easements, en- croachments, or location of boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the commitment or policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. References should be made to an accurate survey for further information. • CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE LOAN POLICY 1990- • The foloowing matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage,costs,attorneys'fees or expenses which arise by reason of: - . 1. (a)Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building or zoning laws,ordinances,.or regulations)restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy,use,'or enjoyment of the land;(ii)the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;(iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the • dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part;or(iv)environmental protection,or the effect of any violation of these laws;ordinances or governmental ulations,except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect;lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recordedc in the public records at Date of Policy. . (b)Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. - 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy;but not excluding from_coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. . 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters: • (a)whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; • (b)not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the.Company by the insured claimant . prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; • (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of.Policy;or • (e)resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. -Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy,,or the inability orfailure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness,to Comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. - • . 5. !Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage,or claim thereof,which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any • consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim,which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender,by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy,state insolvency or similar creditors'rights laws. , • ' AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY(10-17-92) . • and . AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD OWNER'S POLICY(10-17-92) • The tollowing matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage,costs,attorneys'fees or expenses which arise by reason of: • • 1. (a)Any law,ordinance or governmental regulation(including but not limited to building and zoning laws,ordinances,or regulations)restricting,regulating,prohibiting or relating to(i)the occupancy,use,or enjoyment-of the land;(ii)the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;(iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land Is or was a part;or(iv)environmental protection,or the affect of any violation of these laws,ordinances or governmental regulations,except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date.of Policy.(b)Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. • 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. • •• . 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other natters: (a)created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;;(b)not known to the Company,not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but known to the insured claimant • and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c)resulting in no loss or damage to the - - insured claimant; (d)attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy;or(e)resulting in lose or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. . 4. 'Any claim,which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy,by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy,state Insolvency,or similar creditors'rights laws,that is based on: (a)the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer,or • '._ (b)the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (i)to timely record the instrument of transfer;or (ii)of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. ' • SCHEDULE B STANDARD EXCEPTIONS - • SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY--STANDARD COVERAGE AND CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE LOAN POLICY . • 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the • public records;proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments,or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the • • public records. . 2. Any facts,rights,interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in ., • possession,or claiming to be in possession thereof. . 3. Easements,liens or encumbrances,or claims thereof,which are not shown by the public records. . 4. Discrepancies,conflicts in boundary lines,shortage in area,encroachments,or any other facts which a correct survey of the land would disclose,and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Any lien,or right to a lien,for labor,material,services or equipment,or for contributions to employee benefit plans,or liens under workmen's compensation acts,not disclosed by the public records. 6. (a)Unpatented mining claims;(b)reservations or exc frptions in patents or In Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;(c)bean treaty or aboriginal rights,including,but not limited to,easements or equitable servitudes;or,(d)water rights,claims or title to water,whether or not the matters excepted under(a),(b),(c)or(d)are shown by the public records. 7. Right of use,control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation;any prohthition or limitation on the use,occupancy or improvement of the land - resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may format(have been covered by water. 8. Any service,installation,connection,maintenance or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity or garbage collection or disposal,or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY-EXTENDED COVERAGE 1.Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or •. assessments on real property or by the public records;proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments,or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2.Underground easements,servitudes or installations which are not disclosed by the public records. 3 (a)Unpatented mining claims;(b)reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;(c)Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, . including,but not limited to,easements or equitable servitudes;or,(d)water rights,claims or title to water,whether or not the matters excepted under(a),(b), (c)or(d)are shown by the public records. • N.Right of use,control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation;any prohibition or limitation on the use, • occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 5.Any service,installation,connection,maintenance or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity,or garbage collection or disposal,or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. • 10I04-252A • . - . . . • Northwest Region Park Place NORTHWEST REGION Sixth Avenue at University Street • • Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)628-2800 Benton-Franklin Counties 5211 W.Clearwater Avenue,Kennewick,WA (509)783-0660 • • Chelan-Douglas Counties Agency Operations 700 N.Mission Street,Wenatchee,WA Park Place (509)66274721 Sixth Avenue at University Street • - Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)628-2725 Clark County 501'S.E.,Columbia Shores Boulevard Suite 500,Vancouver,WA (206)695-1301 • King County • COMMITMENT FOR 320 108th Avenue N.E.,Bellevue,WA • TITLE AGENTS TITLE INSURANCE • (206)451-7301 Clallam • Cowlitz • Jefferson • King • !Cheap County Lewis • Pacific • W• hatcom • Yakima 9619 Levin Road N.W.,Silverdale,WA (360)692-4556 • Okanogan County 700 Okoma Drive,Omak,WA (509)422-3490 • Pierce County • • 8111 100th Street S.W. Tacoma,Washington (206)589-1488 • • • Snohomish County 2939 Colby Avenue,Everett,WA ISSUED BY (206)252-1156 T RANSNATION TITLE E INSURANCE COMPANY • 9 Spokane County Tra11s118tI011 North 720 Argonne Road,Spokane,WA (509)922-9999 • HOME OFFICE: 1700 Market Street I Philadelphia,PA 19103-3990 Thurston County 2825 Martin Way,Olympia,WA (206)943-4150 j B 1004-252A r?6- �J L �.J e ' I WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: 1 - ALSr N COURTNAGE MACA I .,AY&PROCTOR LLP ' 1000„ECOND AVENUE,SUITE 3900 • 1 SFATTLE,WA 90104-1045 • O • ATTN: J.PARKER MASON O r 1 n. • .-. . Docum• a rifle: Quit Claim Deed a • • Grantor. Powell-Orillia Associates e • Grantee: Powell-Orillia L.L.C. Lettial Dc criptlon: c' Abbreviated Legal Description: Lots 4,F.and i of Burlington Northern, a r.El •r cn binding site plan,according to the City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded Y under King County Recording No. 9206302696, in Volume 161 of Plats, W Page 8 through 11,Records of King County • Full Legal Description: See below Assessor's Tax Parcel Nos.: 125360-0040-01; 125360-0050-08; 125360-0060-06 Reference Nos.of Documents Released or Assigned: Not applicable CI • O QUIT CLAIM DEED • • f THE GRANTOR, POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, a Washington general C7 partnership, pursuant to the dissolution of the partnership, conveys and quit claims to POWELL-ORILLIA L.L.C:, a Washington limited liability company, the following described real estate, situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, • together with e't appurtenances thereto: ••• Lots 4,6 and 7 of Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, according to the City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded under King County Recording'No. 9206302696, in Volume 161 of Plats, Page 8 through II, Records of King County. DATED this the 23rd day of April, 1997. POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, 8 a Washin ton general partnership r 4 By (.r._J . • loyd owell,General Partner By et-----Q2Lefe • Pe W.Powell,General Partner • rid it lE mt 1366%061:3n1197 •1• QUITCLAIM r 1MASOMP'OWF:t.I URlu.IA I,.. "It c1 1 t. ...ii.:• . . VESTING (-^ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTYOF, 'LL _ )ss. , On this day of �, ,1997,before me,the undersigned,a !'Wray • P'Ibl.:in and cur the State of Wv-'iington,duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared Lloyd W. Powell, known to me to be the General Partner of POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES,the partnership that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged th, said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership,for the purposes there,::mentioned,and on oath stated that he was authorized to :xx•ire said instrument. I certify that I know or have satisfactory c.:der:-e that the person appearing be&bre me • and making this acknowledgment is the person when,,true signature appears on this document. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the uay and year in the 4:crt:ticate above written. ! . ------ • l.1Q nl APJ behrninAer. NOTARYPUBUC 1'rintName sTATE OE WASNINGTON r JANICf TCCHMACHER • NOTARY PUBLIC in and fo the Stat f ►+N Anoanm.nl Em:a JUL 10.I99E Washington,residing at __ My commission expires 7• /PD• ,Q In . n (CP STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • p '/ )ss. Cr) COUNTY OF �� ) • On this g day ofii1 ,1997,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared Peter W. Powell, known to me to be the General Partner of POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES,the partnership that executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership,for the purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument. 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing before me and making this acknowledgment is the person whose true signaturcappears on this document. • WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate above written. -. . Li JJL4fl &) i. • SIn re , NOTARY PUl1UC STATE OF WASHINGTON Print Name JANICE Me:MAUCH/it NOTARY PUBLIC in an r e State f • MY AA... amen,Elvis*.JUL 10.1905 Washington,residing at My commission expires • D• . D • I J66iLMX.J/J I N7 -2- QI IITCI.A I M JMASUN'POW11.1.u1RlI.I.I A • t Q . ------,-------------1. . .. . . 7 _ . . . . . • , . 1 • PN8 ?.cr` M• /1J-1 /o f � Lsr. 2.-yc44— Ir,AY 9 ?9 7O ' EASEMENT _r \ FU53•1:)SU rantor, GLACIER PARK COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter 1 t called Grantor, for and in consideration of Ten and No/100 Dollars (S10.00) to it ▪ paid, and the agreements heroin contained, does hereby grant to PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, s Washington corporation, hereinafter called Grantee, an n • ▪ easement for underground communication cable through, under and along the follow- ing described premises situated in King County, Washington: 0 • A strip of land 10 feet wide located in Section 10, Township 23 r^ North, Range S East, W.M., lying parallel with, a d=Ijacent to an K o. easterly of the east line of the new alignment cf Lind Avenue and being more particularly indicated in green on print marked Exhibit "A" and attached hereto. This easement is made subject to and upon the following express con- dltions: I The Grantor, for itself and its successors and assigns, reserves all • rights to use the property hereinbefore described for any and all purposes what- soever not inconsistent with the easement hereby granted when deemed necessary or expedient to the Grantor. Rights reserved shall be so exercised as not to • . deluge or interfere with the easement as above defined. This easement is subject to all existing interests of third parties in said property of any kind or nature whatsoever and any and all extensions or renewals thereof. . I1 • This instrument does not grant or convey unto the Grantee any rights or title to the surface of the soil along the route of said permanent utility ease- ment except for the purpose of laying down, inspecting, restoring and replacing utilities; provided that any such work which shall disturh the surface of the soil • shall he subject to the granting of ■ temporary construction permit granted by the • Grantor. • • III • The Grantee shall protect and save harmless the Grantor from any and all claims, demands, loss, damage expense and liability of every kind and description • including personal injury and for any damage to or loss or destruction of property whatsoever suffered by the Grantor, its heirs, successors and assigns, or by any persons, firms o• corporations, because of the construction and/or maintenance of said facilities. Iv • In The event that said property ths11 at any time cease to be usw.i for utllItt pnrposea. or shall by operation of law or otherwise hec^tie vacated or abandoned, the easement herein granted shall immediately cease end terminate with. out notice or other proceedings on the part of the Grantor and the Grantee, it, successor. or .seagn., shall Immediately reconvey said property to tnc Grantor. i'.ae I of . ',AU.. ' IT I • . ,, .. . I t r • • • • •.••• --- 77) 7 11111 .1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed by its proper officers and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed • this 27th day of November , 1978. II GLACIER Pi-RR COMPANY. � By Vice s d t OD CD Attest et— CD Asst. Secretary CN ACCEPTED: PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELENE COMPANY By Divie n Fsssi l to de Plant Attest: t C ni • Tres Assistant ecretary 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. • County of Ramsey ) . I On this 27th day of November , 1978, before me personally appeared J, C. Kenady and G. F. Steinhibel to me known to be Vice President and Assistant Secretary of the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and on oath stated that they were authorised to execute the raid Instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed ey official seal the day and year first above written. •- II �/�j ,L.._ • , otary u c in an or t o a o Mlunesota, residing ; ' St. Paul. si %, rage 1 of 2 pages 4. 11 F.--------------------7---------7-------------i I 1 . . . . ; 1 I - ___J - L -----,-----,--,—.,..._______________ i 880' -•1 i// / 1 ! I • '1 1 I . s 1 r 345 275 27 5�—' 250 I j 80 r, I 1' I i i 1 i •�`` I I 1 • • 50D • ;25840om ������ ..�I, 191600$ i 2788COa c Cs v1 'r %16,, ';‘:2-) 1 : i m • 11 • o \ 1 • ! c \1 345 I 190 r 1 �' 170 I S.W. 29th St.I 53 I 1 2 80 I - 1 i. ) 34 5 1 190 1 \a'' _.,. 4 ,c i tn I • I / // 0 n n 'n 2 �. i0� �� �/ C,\ // In in I 19250 • 0 24 225043 `°i I° 16960 00 ' 1688 I / / 1 I 1 1 // / 1 I . J I - / +'/ • / r I - 1 .:W. 3Ott St I 1 • 380 I 265 r 265 ��___�280 ' •— - 38 0 J/ 7 265 - I ' 265 F 1 280 •)00 I i I • S' I 1 . I I 1 5.1`i �n v� v� I ;4\ ,;\ m i ,.----.6i-----to�..n 5i ----c� cv i4 1 N I ,c1. NI J 31Gt.,00'� " • m 2I8601m�,.cc 2186000 m' \2383009 : 1 i \ \\ 1 . \1 i 1 `. • �J � i 1 \ • 1 I • \ \ • \ 1n I ' \\ • I 1 • \ \ \ , \ \ I • 1 . . I 1 \ ••1 I ., I ' I ` . . -- _- -- , ...WI V' I 1 O I \ ! !1 I A 34f I i 265 I 265 \\ell ?• 24& 1 ��1 1 I i 10d i �� in 9 IJ \ \\ 1 . I 1 o en • i5DC00"� 27c1�S]S I moo►, co \ 1600004)\\ i • 16.5 3 j I \ !Q i f p j /. \\ ;W . Z 400 • v % -_� 4 590 \ Iii 1 • 655 — I 565 \ ' m 1 \ ' R I .`` `` IO I �. ` � Lr) > •c ��/ I \%/�b r .\ • r . O O „ • a 7 385000[� i I: 445400� l� , L----_____ • 68� -16.5•--- 965 1 _ 680 —/j i15— ��� i' Tl���j�� // , O / 0 11�I 5(�' y o•'/ /// 1895000 \q' a W ,e ---- 715 '// I '' _ 6. _ -- —_-- 725 /T— ,/ - • _ 0// // 2I4000rb �� oo I72500c' • M lk• /' /' / • -- i 7 -- // ,/ / ( 700 (' - '/ 6 • I I m SW: 4/s/ St. i I- 12bb -- '7 I / I'�_� I / - I Ro ORI L-I_I A. 1;I . -:NDU ora 1L. e"�K , I —I RFNTC! , WA.$0 �. .I T � ,, a N.I . J M. M.M. TTL // - At.TS:1": L��• r ,,, . . /� / /� �l / / / . i / �, I I 0 / i • I . / ' ' • 1 .• / ,...•.' — .I. • • -• •. _ .. - =. ::• Si x.'. ,_... •• -" Mil a+ IN;: RES:iII'f1YC COVENANT • 0 THIS INDENTURE entered into between (tAl'IFR PARK COMPANY, a Minnesota iicorporation, hereinafter called 'Owner', end Brad Cunningham, an individual. C hereinafter called 'Purchaser', it WHEREAS. Owner presently owns Lots 4 and 6, Block 2, Burlington Northern 1:. Orillia Industrial Part of Renton Division I, according to plat recorded under • At,di;ores No. I809250902, King County, Washington; and WHEREAS, Purchaser desires to expand a building on Lot 5 of said ' Block 2, and the parties, es . r:tult thereof, desire to establish setback ,: = requirements with respect to future building or buildings to be constructed on t said Lots 4, 5. and 6, Block 2, of said recorded plat; I , — • NOW THEREFDRE, for ;_od and vsluat'le consideration, the parties agree tt `�.:' as follows: ? OEM t 1. No building cr structure shall be constructed or maintainer un Lt,e sn„th 74 f.et of Int 6, anti the ..not 3'1 feet of Lot 4. Block 2, of said recorded plat. , {: — LV ' 1 Z. No building or structure shall be constructed or maintained on A he �." -- m:j V:t .,/• re.. of _. 5 R1nct 7, .f tiid retore.i plat. . ' . i _ T, n`Is agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors and t ...,Ir. qn of these covenants or any changes In sari d�t7•)n5 3f ;he ;Jr....es. .[TT '1..,.1 e M1 i must be approved by the Lity of Kenton. I. OA'Cn this 22rsc ley at 1,21:1: 19RI• I. Nmcn i F GLACIER PARK CC PAHt j v1 \� By, er.• . l l tl`(rn /. � 1 • . Attest: f /: .,'•,_y-- LSBISTiosm secretary . .. • • . it ,.,. ... .. MIT 5 C :7 >~H '�i ::vim loc.!W I ' . . • .;:. _D.. iza.t.ic.(ci.1. ;..,.-_-..... •,I 6 . • al..4 i : Tr , STATE Of NINNt OT.. ) . ) Ss. • Milt County ut Ramsey I r••i 'On this 22nd day of April , 081, before we Personally appearea j y ���+ 1t. Fittrin known to be Vice President and Aeetj tent Secretary, respectively of i 7. G.ACIER PARK COMPANY. the corporation that executed the within and foreyoln9 t instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary . J act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. J and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrurwit. ! [... .r .: -ffl. wTT __ .;ucocnc Awe. h.r.,,ntn get my hand and affixed my off`clal 1 1 J seal the day and year first above written. x uu....... -i aeg. • 1 - J w rrurtm - Notary P. is in and, •r the WI tiM K•Y a�lsoT► r P.wu•cc,,a'Y State o Minnesota, siding t . 1'Y,c�0.4•..(.•.,.a. 17,/sty at St- Pwul x A / : . My Commission expires T Nevrrbe.r 17. 19e5 .. • • • j STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF Uk.j6 ) ' n- this day personally Vp;..ir.n hafnr. - f't'A11 r''i«lNiaKr1aH MI ~ to -e known to ha the individual described in aawito executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that 1 - signed tho saline as iik Li' free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioner--- n( 1.L - ! GpIEN under 'i0' hand and offilcial seal this .-- day of ` •/ ,C tl r 19 _. . 1^r i 4 7 /^ • ' a�,/1(a .ia.• ; &�Cr� 4 . Notary Public in and for tE t r . State 1{a n n, residing at .< ) , i ;;i I / •i 1M !I hi 1 J. • ; u.ti b I• 1 i... VII I . . . . . ri . h,r-•,.0 np .'-• MOTO NECaNOS �oL. IQ PALE— 8 KRCL.L IJA.P COMPANY,INC. - SEATTLE . • 161 • 8 • BURLINGTON NORTHERN • L.ra-'7Z . FILE NO. BSP - 014-_92 A BINDING SITE PLAN_ ,�.1I,.y SIGNATURE PAGE i:••.-`•"%i!•J SECTION 30, TWP. 23 N. AGE.5 E, W M. s';: '' SECTION 31 , TWP. 23 N. , RGE. 5 E. W.A.. ) �T. DEDI CATID'B: • CITY CF•NEWTON KING COUNTY WASNINGTON ,'•,.,,M..,.:••� KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS T1UT WE. THE UNDERSIGNED. OWNERS ��• «•N 71 IN PEE SIMPLE or THE LAND HEREBY PLATTED, HEREBY DECLARE TNIS PLAT AND DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC FOREVER,-ALL ROADS. EASEMENTS AND . WAYS SHOWN HEREON WITH THE RIGHT TO RASE ALL NECESSARY SLOPES TOR . CUTS AND TILLS, AND THE RIGHT TO CONTINUE TO DRAIN SAID ROADS`AND • WAYS OVER AND ACROSS ANY LOT OR LOTS. -WHERE WATER MIGHT TAKE A E,Q2L3I . NATURAL COURSE, IN THE ORIGINAL REASOMARLL GRADING Or THE ROADS AND WAYS SHOWN HEREON. • DEVELOPMENT OR CONSTRUCTION Or ANT INPROVEMLRTI UPON THE REAL ' PROPERTY HEREIN O[SCRIRED SMALL SE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BINDING WALINGTp1 MORTNENN RAILROAD PRNS(NTIL3.IIC CLACIER IAMB COWPANY • SITE PLAN APPROVED ST THE CITY Or RENTON OM % , 11 , AND A LE LAwARC mPPOMATH7M A CELAWWRE (ENP04ATKIM THE (FINAL PLAT) (►INAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) APPROVED—IT TIC )4.,c5. • CITY o► 'Imre* ON Nph , lf- By: ./ 7Z ByI /,! •A/•74'. THIN BINDING SITE PLAN AND ALL 0► ITS RLOUIRLMLNTI !MALL ■L' It.: Vic' Pn. w1 Its: Ylid /!J LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE OW ANY PURCHASE)OR OTHER PERSON ACQUIRING AN INTEREST IN TML WITHIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY AND ALL PORTIONS or THE PROPERTY IN THIS BINDING SITE PLAN ARE SUBJECT TO SETBACK STATE Or WASHINGTOM) - REOUIREMENTS or CITT OF RENTON SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. IRS COUNTN Or KING ) - . • T IS IS TO CERTIFY THAT OM THIS ld CBE- DAY OF - JANp lVRYTYDR'! rTMIT2rATFt l/ _ • __ , 1112. BEFORE PIE ►Ei SoMALLY APPEARED A' -I MEREST CERTIFY THAT THIS BINDING SITE PLAN I! BASLO ON TML • • TO H[ KNOWN TO B MC �y 0 DUAL MGTON NORTHERN PROPERTY SURVEY AS PREPARED BY BUSH. ROED AND HITCHING!, INC.. RAILROAD PROPERTIES INC.• THE CORPORA ION THAT EXECUTED THE AND RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. HIOSSYf003, THAT INC WITHIN AND FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED SAID INSTRUMENT • REARING! AND DISTANCES ARL SHOWN CORRECTLY. AND THAT THE LOT TO BE THE TREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED Or SAID CORPORATION,'. CORNERS SMALL DI SET ON THE GROUND. ' /o5 THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN HLNTIONED, AND ON OATH STATED - THAT i_..lE i/ AUTHORISED J�7 - TO EXECUTE SAID INSTRUMENT. ' �J L VV j 6NAWe 440*$4+ IN WITNESS WHEREOF. SAID CORPORATION WAS CAUSED THIS INSTRUMENT .1L►fRLT .t• NGMMUj, P.L.11.2S02 Tq�BL EILCVT[O BT ITS IRONER OFFICER THIS yY" DAT 07 • ` - • IM WITNESS tomato', I KAYE NEREUMrTO RET MY NAND AND AFFIXED MY EXAMINED AND A►►ROvED THIS 2.4 . DAY O/1 ,�, 1197 A.D. OIFICIAL SEAL THE DAT AND TEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTER. n1 �7 . •.•. • //l ADM N1 RAT'O Or PLANHINclW1LD1NG/►USLIC WOAXI ( '�� CQ.1(' ep u� CITY e! QIMT•N . M AST ►UREIC IN AND -FDA 114;STATE - Qj/WASIIINCTOM. RESIDING AT -pYYY/., r STATE o► YAYNINCTONI / •R ,3 �//p/. ASSFISOR't CFRTYTIrATFI COUNTY OF KING � - EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS 3 O DAY OF..)."Ai . 115E A.D. • • T S If TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS ' * DAY OF -/O dy,p f R�ks I ,uZ,;.•� • I - --- 2A� BEroR[ HE ►ETlibaiLL4 A/l7susoA etr1JFY MILSIOA • TO HE ANOWN TO BL TM r GLACIER PARR COMPA- NY. THE CORPORATION THAT SECUTED THE WITHIN AND FOREGOING 1N- ,. , STRUMENT• AND ACBMOWLEDCED SAID INSTRUMENT TO SE THE FREE AND . • VOLUNTARY ACT AND GEED OF SAID CORPORATION, FOR THE USES AND iNAHCL MIRTrTDR'S rTRTTTfr�T1I • r PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. AND ON OATH STATED THAT T `•f„ • J• AU IIORS LED TO THAT THERE ARE EXECUTE SAID 1NSTR Ir�. I MEREST CERTIFY THAT ALL PROPERTY TAXIES ANE PAID. • NO-DELINQUENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CERTIFIED TO THIS OFFICE FOR IM WITNESS WHEREOF, SAID CORPORATION HAS CAUSED THIS INSTRUMENT COLLECTION, AND THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, CERTIFIED TO THIS IER et EXECUTED ST ITS PROPER OIFICER THIS ..7 41 AI.- DAT O/ OFFICE /OR LOLL[CTIOHION ANT OI THE PROPERTY HEREIN CONTAINED, [/�/-�,•�__', DEDICATED AS STREETS, ALLLTI, OR ►OR O'1'HO< PUBLIC USE. ARL PAID l lf�. IN FULL THIS .?r DAY O► T._, . lfil. ,p..n.�.. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MT NAND AND AFFIXED KT e+'`13t 1I).J, Of FICIAL SEAL THE DAT AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. OFFICE OI FINANCE • I f`r•✓OMiIC„I ;' .. =t 1 ., /• ,tt ...Pis . iR A. TOR, LNG COUNTY i. _ •• MOT Y PURLlC IN AND / R NTr STATE DIRECTOR."RING COUNTY OLPUTT.KING COUNT! • ` Or SMINGTOM, RESIDING AT/I•�11� OIIICE OF FINANCE /LS OFFICE 07 FINANCE , P e . /3�9 4N1 ROC I.�' LLW '3 DIRECTOR Or /IMAMCi �`-.++.. ' I1T1{'R IPTTOlMI I MEREST CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE NO DELINQUENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS D R-CEL Al D AND THAT ALL SPECIAL ASSCSSMITS CERTIFIED TO THE CITT TREASURER THAT PORTION 0/ BURLINGTON NORTHERN GRILLER INDUSTRIAL PARR Of FOR COLLECTION ON ANT PROPERTY HEREIN CONTAINED DEDICATED FOR RENTON DIVISION I, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IM VOLUME 105-OF PLATE.• STREETS. ALLEYS, OR ER PUSLIC.USE ARE PAID IN FULL. PACES I7 AND 13, RECORDS Of XING COUNTY. DESCRIBED AS FOLLONSI • •BLOCS 2: LOTS 1, 7, I. S, 7 AND IT AND LOT 2 OF CITT OF NEWTON ��/(//JJ,. •. • - LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. Zia-014-SS, RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY //// •V�^.r - - - G,/2G/Q� . RECORDING NO. !{0717fO01L b1RECTOR• CITY O/ RENTON . OFFICE OF FINANCE , TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF RAILROAD SICMT-Or-WAY LYING . - _ ADJACENT TO LOTS I. 2, 1, S. 7, I AND f IN BLOC* 7, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT O/ BURLINGTOM NORTHERN ORILJSA INDUSTRIAL TARE OF RENTON . IICORDTNC rTPTYFTr1TTI 9.10£.30.7 49 6 . DIVISION I, AS PLR PLAT RECORDED IN TOWNS 105 OI PLATS, PAGES 12 • ' AND 13, RECORDS OF XING COUNTY) FILED FOR RECORD AT THE.REQUEST O/ THE CITT OF RENTON THIS JO DAY Or.7,,..... IHJ, AT Y• MINUTES PAST J'Pe SITUATE IN THE CITY O► RENTON. COUNTY O► RING, STATE OT WASHING- AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 0► P�U' PAGES S;�i ' RE TON. CORDS Or KING COUNTY, WASHINCIO IAMrTL H1 - DIVISION OI RECORDS AND ELECTIONS ' PARCEL B Or SHORT PLAT NO. I74-71, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PUT, - RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 710424,001p - SITUATE IX THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OI KING, STATE OF WASHING- Tangy Ate e.,e ' SUPERINT • • TOM. • MANAGER M • -. - MIkL.• L.LVLI.W I I • • _ HOTO 1LECOtLOS • • VOL. 161 PAGE . • K11CLL MAP COMPANY.INC. I ' SCATTLE 161 NORTHERN . i.r.I, FILE NO. BSP - 014-92 ?J ,I. !% A �Id.QING SITE PLAN _ NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS �• ,• SECTION 30, TWP. 23 N. , RGE.S E, W.M. i��� • SECTION 31 TWP. 23 N. aGE. S E, w:M. ,;.:• .•"''• :� • CITY Cf aENTON KING COUNTY .WASNI NGTON •+• 0••• Tj LaI.l1 Lail. ...CIL•OF cmT1./■1TT0.• ON PLAT N. 111.111. Al NCO10Y TTAI Mon.N•ton t or M[Iuf OfI.ILIocTM.e.FO•Y OOtL- MOU SIOO cowTT ■ITONIN M. LII 1MUCTCILL PA./of 110.10•AA rno.ltl 11 T0.A*O 106 OI PLAIT. 'ply.„{, • .PY11 IS AM 1). O.10N0 Of 11110 MINT, NNIICYM, 0IK.1.03.. • TOLLMS. o/Ylw llt Of TO:00NOtAR OWN OI tOT•Of SLDO 1 N TO[PAT tT/�MIN at TOt .OTT tOMTO t1 AT \ ./ lalO OI.C. ): N•Lt ICM• •MI•/•AILaIA IIN.ft NL PASS or SIrTN AS N.C.WRIT 1•111•0.••1R NAN t.t YR L_•a Of 1011 I NI I O DUNN 1l TWY1l IN Or PLAN. INN 11 AM 1), SOWN taw. LO00N7?T,. a N K t•1KTM1 MOPC■LOOTS 1•N SS M OASTL. •I.•Wt{T•LOO OAST tilt LCI S •.I ROM■Of 111O.N FIST,NON,ONTO•0•N••1• . LI.[OI ID L •A ONTA1 Of1•.11 M PA IC n 10 A TS NON TO Wilt 10.11 I■R TO Vol ONM PW l■•I 1NTNOtT 1ST STOOKS Y • • log•O•TNIR 0ATIN A WIN Or1•f.11 ION: T.M[ NOT.l1LT MOM[WM N NO NAM..•11••1•1.11 ALA -SAID MAM.. 101.01 IIR . a.0•MMOR•tTLT ANSI MIS MOM AN It&TYCI OF 1.O.N FIR TO Mt TN[INN or 0i 1wIM1 TOMS ONTO 1.0I•Il• LA.,JII.M • T.11K. •TINSAL ANY Or /4.41.40• TO A POI..Or MO• IIRI •)1•II• OMIT YY•II It R! 1.••C 1.■O1IT C0..11 T•ACt INT AN • TOR[ LATIN A LA010{ Of 0/ 1•f O•l)• POST III IlR TO Too OMTO PNI•I Ion /T N1.11 I Y AN WOWS N II.N FOR NNW A COMM A"•• to 100 TO(K1 IPA./0.11•.F•WT AIIN YIO LAN.. 10..•1"TTor ••11•11•1 NON NoT1 2•0.•1.• WIT NL.11 FOR TO Tot 0o0TY. TO TOS TMS PAIR Or.(CININ. K,. or OOfTW.NT )111 N..N! Noes, 0O1T1 ......l1• LAST • LOT lOITAII/ II.IN•0u.■MM. 414.0O NTT ANN SAID NTT WWI.TO TOO S0[INOM. • LOT Tow,414. 1.0.0.1 .ONAI FOOT. - ♦L1LL. • IOC. ' - , TWAT~FIN N SLOPS I M TOO PAT It.OLLI.O.OI 00MOfw all.. TNT PMTIM M.SAPS I or MO PLAT M t1d10.1O..OOITTOI MIS- . L1A I0.RSIAL Pin O/WPM Al SAWN IP NUNS 104 or PLAN. L14 I.SO.NWILL PAY Of••f1P Y a•O.Mob 11 Nu1.I IN OF PLAIT. FNA 11 AM II. A.t!•MS 0/YN 0,1I11, IAD110ORr. 11100110 Y • 'AAA,11 No. L1M 11„ 010 Y AIN11I• tR1,WIl O•TM NM, 10M..1 O.IT Mt 1NTOtIR MPtl•I LIT 1 t/ PAID SUMO /1 CO..0011.4 AT TOO ..NOLA.T MM O S/1.•T 1 OF •Atl DWI II . MOWS W 411•00•M MA• N..0.1. FOR AMPS Of W. LIP[ NEMO•. S 1•N A TO LOTS WIN AL . I WV LSII LI I APO 1 M ' M YID 01 1 A Ot N•ICS M CO/.IO POST TO A C11TS COMMIS TO TOO Y1O YIO I A WOW.SI 1314.41 MAT/TOOOM mom.....•4.• MOTI.OST 141,11.4 • SYMO OF S1.14 FORS TO00CI 0841112 LT. NM 19.11 FOOT TO IMO 5OOTO YM00 M OwT0011T IIR ITOtSTI 0400MORtl_T. Y...NOW MAN YID!WON Al AN 910T•NI N NO M I0411 0041/•01•144I1 MAN WO NNW 0111410 111.01 TOR/ 06.04,91111 11.01.11111 YLNY 4/1A NOT • 11•40•11•TO TOl MOLt SOV T1M M • C[NNW 1.00•11• IAN 110.00 IIRI TOW(0101 I0•31.4• •YNI■OfONT11IR LOLL STOMP NOON NMI 41•00.71• VIM NOT 104.41 TONI MONO NNW 1.04.11•WON 110.44 FIST TO MS I GALSGALSYI YO 1/1.N POST TO TM SONNI OP CONN Of LIT•M • ONTO OA0t11,M OORNYO FIST 0CR T'I IO1 MS N0M 40•11.01. •. .Is FS.NOM II MOKt ONTO 01•04•1 I O.OT MAN T10,LA A.Y N TO R UPI N. GIN MID 0AN11 1•. VON T TOW NR OfN 1 •ICS1.1 . /AIO LOT S A OISTYST OF 00.11 TINT TO A MOTO MCAT.TO TOO _ 'MONO INTO 1.10.11• ■A.0 110.00/tnl TOM M S OIT I NTrotr•YTIN A NNW OI 4.1,11 NIT/ MOM I•TTIOLT APO .[R 144.41 ISM MONO•oul 1•N•1I•PAT 110.42. I/R T1 OAF• O 0N 1M•Alt[LBWS II AN ti N1ICl./N•.l• TM? N ro NO41.1 TWOCI NAM I4•)1•04•SAM 146.01 ION TO MO TOUT TO 0 A CO .• •I11.9. A iN OF CY01• CNN, M w•. t• * ' I •f.Il N. I.1• NY NAM TO .1 Coo.. N.IN A WIN OF 400..1 0I111 MOIL. ANN .AI• • • ' MT. Y AK SIN•M OF 4I.10 ISO MO••0.A c•eTTAL AMA 01 Ottt/O1.1.1 11.I40 SOWS ION. • 41.40•11.2 MOCI OPAL 11•114•11• YR/11.1. ISM MOM NUN ' 4J•.0.11•TOOT 10,II FIST/ T1MCO t•1RO 11•10•41• INT TO TITS 11111IwIM. • ' LOT No/kV. 1•4.41A OOgrl IIR. , Le11 . TNT 0900144 Of ALMA I Or TOO PLAT M twL1.OTO0 NIMN•MIL. ' LIA 1NUR.1AL ITN OF SOTO.AA./C1Ntl A MINI 100./FLATS. PIi59 11 AM LI. MIN..If 01N OS1•1.ormro fl.Nam1.O Y • FOLLOWS. • �1, I1OCIN tO AT TOO 1MRIOAST OWN M AN I OF SAID SLOPS IJ • T1OCt own 1•N•0.•I.R AL/I0 TOO us?LMO or LIT 1 Of YID MACS 1 A 11I1MoC0 II 014.64 IIRI NSW mom 44•01.N•PAT MAT PO.T140 O/OLIO/N Mt PLAT M OI•ILIONM.ONTO•MIL. I/I.N IfR1 MO.[f••N• 1•N•410•WV 11.11 I[RI TOfM IONS LIA IwOMITO LL TAM 01 NON.Y P1.00a141.A INNS 100 Of PLATS. I PYA .I II. MOWN 0/NO C01YR. •.AMI.CIW., NNW..A. N•00•.I• ItST 10/.0• MIITI TOWS MOTS 1.00•MI• ONT •SOLO MYAS, TONI MOM MOM?I•41•01•MAT SILO\tier TO TOO NIT1101 OI TO[ONE S11.11 ION OF NIS•LSO 1 AM TOf NM MIN O/ORI.- •INI\LIMO SOON 1•N•00•MOT 4/1.01 row TO TII P0119 LINO OP MI lONOfNT CON[!11 MT I OF Int,MAW IJ • LIT/OF•AIO SLITS /1 NINO see..41•41•I/•NIT ALI10 OW 11.110.1 1011111 1•141441•SST•LAN TO.MOT LIPS Of FOR 1 OF 441■ • O.N.LOBO APO IPA 1(RAL[NOLOMAT14. 111.11 FOR TO TWO Ion •OACO 1 A•141•01.1 Or 114.44 FOSTI TO.00...N1 14•01•11•!1ST NMI.OI LI MINI ONTO 1•0.1•111•NIT 101.44 11171 111.04 Il.J TOOLS IMM 1.1I•M R WN OAS •MST 11.01 III TOW.WM MOM 0I SAID MOLT.LN11 SOON 04•11•Il.MST Il1,N • .1•N•11• [SF 1./.60 FOOT' MONO NOM 1•11O.00• MAT II.IS • FOR TO 111 11113111011.1 M A OY.OMAN CNN TOMATO TO TOO.OR • • /tIT. TtOKS IONS 10449•51•NOT 1.1.00 ION TO MI OBIT LIPS OF . • 1Wf sow 411.011 /WW1 NNW I•.O•M•MR ass owe' WIN LIPS NTIM•/♦YIN N .1 0 I Ll YOB 000 Lt l.t 11 0.T1 L L101 1f1.4I 11R TO TWO a01RW LI It•I AT 0./YI.OLM ll MINCE - • N0..00 FOOT A�Tttaf./SAID OAITOLLt YNIP 1.ONNL LII■ worn•FITT O WT OWN YID soon T LIN OAIO MIT TO•MTt •• ML 0IYO•(1ST ALN4 WS ONTO•NOON.21 OASTINN�NL'Or COK•Wt T.To[T.ON Y.iN A NOON M NM..,MINI 111.11•14•TO TN SY101.101 OI A COMMON CMTI CO.CAWI TO/N• • NOT SATINS A MANS Of 100.11 I1R1 11Oct S.011O0LT OS...IIR MNCl LANNLF •L.N OAN C0•T• Y AOC SISTA/CO 110.11 FIN ALON LASS NSW.MOM■A C8NYL AIOLA O/•6•10.11•1 'NW.A1• A 0/ •16.11..NOVI .41.14. .UN SOOT. 11.10•11• .MIT 110.81 MIN T1 MID LAST I.011. Ulm•r • lll.t. F1RI NORM NAM 3•01•11••IPT 1I.44 MIRI MOM OMW T.001 YD TNN 0..1O.NO OF A 011.TAI.0O COTS COIt4T,TO TOO .1•14•41•MAT 141.44 MR TO TWO SMiw11.4. WI SATIN A WIN M 1101.10 051.1 IA WOBL LI.[19114KI1 SA1O ' • LOT WOWS 4•5.111 OPYII FOR. {•10•CVO[II M I •OCOMS TOWS L f/OK[O/ •0 O A0V 5 SOT TO 0TILISII w/ LOT 0 OF SAID SLOG. 1)M1NO 0N11 01•00•I0• NOT OL000 SAID • • NWT.LIN 001.00 FOR,TOMS W111 1•04•94• OA01 110.00 I1111 TOOTCS N*TO II•)1•11• OAST 315./0 IIR/ MACS OW. 1.14.01• ' YN 111.11 Fen TO TOt 11M MIN M DO1M1M. r LOT CONA11.111.111 000M/In. .. TWA▪ T P ol,M Or SIOO 7 Or 191 PLAT Or SNL1•L M.(13N1[Y MIL. •- ' LIA taltrli•L OW OF OCITM AS SR000O IS.OWNS 101 01 PLATS. Lai11 PACTS IW 11 AM 11. P00 OF.IN COUNT.OW M.I.c1 . 041C11.0 AI ' ML1AS. • TWAT 04N110 Sr MOO I M TOO MAT M SNLININ PONONA MIL. • LI.IPMfTOILL PW Of SOIOI Al ILIORO tl IS NINO III Of PLATS. . N1/OCIOL AT MI 1.OTOIOAST MIS. Of LOT 1 01 •ASS SLOPS 11 PYA 11 YD II. SEWN OF NM COORT..•MULL\\. 00IC11OO Y MYCt NR. 1.11•N•wen own*M[OAST Lire Or LOT 1 N.11 IWaAO1 •L.C.I A DIRYIR Of OLIO\.IIR W[M KMM1 TO Mt TOW OII MAc1 IO•.TINSM SOWN•1•f••N•NOV •11.0. ITN, MOP[ONTO ' • • 1I•.0•.1•T1.T 11.11 FOOT TO TOO MOT NOc1■OI•OVNIYT 11R ......i Pt AT TI■S.OTOtIST COO1O•I FOR• 1■ S•I•OIOCI ll -ROfR/ M.00[ NOVO 0,11.01•WMOT AL111 SAID NK1■ SO1.1I TOSPC[NfT1 N•SO•.l•NOT AWN TOO OfRtlLT PM......M 0/ I[RI 614•1/• OAST SLO.•A IIRI TON[ INM SAID 0OWA LIMO 111.41 ION TO TOO PRIMA P10N.01-••T...CIO !0.11•N•TIST NO.tf NM TOTOC[INN 1•t•'U• NIT 71•.N O/Liw AWOOU NW.WT 00.Y••11.OAR 401.01 MST TO A CMS {R TO TOI•I•TO I•KI■OP S 41015 •IN 0TO(RI TOItKI a•.M COWAN TO TOO 0O11YR SATIN A WIN OF S1.00 MOT. TOMt • OMIT AMMO {ASS SA•LI■ \ION FC[T/ \.•MOLT• .ONI ARIWLT. PM OAOTOLO 51 SAID CMTO Y Ala 1•1••11• [AST III.00/[RI TOMS IM111 MI•1f••/• WEST 1N.11 DIRK••ION/1ST M•.I.L.1 A cOfYL AMY N.••NIN•TO TIN /SST, MCOCO .O.T. 1.1•.I.• LAST •1.1f /t0T1 TOtfCO to■Tr • OON1tlL1 01481111041,OOIRwO 70TO.OWN,WPM soon,OLIO•/l• 01.01•1)• NIT 0..01 ITT?M Mt.OSMCA.T CONtI Of LOT 1 Or LAUSTAIAC YM rM1.•MI.lI•.Il f00 TO TWONNMIIT IOwO . ea.*MOM II Newt WM•t•0.•1/• AST LI0[ 10.00 FEN TO TM OfI•IO AR II TOOT.•OYi1 l.1r•M• .R MOM TOt AT All OI •OVTOA*T rooms OF LOT I O/YID OI.C1 11 MUM WWII•.•01•)1• SASS AT•l DiST•M.I 1.000 MN TO•MITI WWII TO TOO •NIN• A.M M Y 000TN1IT NTIN A •A.10.O/ Deg.'. IIRI MtPC■ ONT.ISLT. w est AWN/AID t N Nod.), NCR: •ORM.RALT. A. LLI AL1•Co..,AAAIC 111104C1 OF R 1050 FAST I16.00 F[ I Mfse.'DOM 3••11•N. LAN'.1..7I Iron.TO 191 •PIT Ll1[01 TO[OAST 411.18 I[R Of 6110 OW.l! OO/M .11..1 TIN 11..w1 A COTOAL AMA Of/0•N•f0•TO TOO•fLi.- • 1.1:•0.• CAB,ALO.0 YID PAT LII! 1.1.11 FEET! OOTC ■IM. •••00•ll• NST IOI.Sa TNT, Mt.c[ OO1T• 1.1••M• FIST •).)1 I[CT! T•[•CC .OVTW .••••'11• [AAT 11..00 N.T: T.1.CI a00TC SOT COINAIMO 101.111 NOW FtR. 1.10•N'•CR 11..1 I/R1 TOTWCI 005.I70 4..89.11• LAST III.,.flCT • TO Mt TOW[MITT 01 AILI.IIN. LOT COFT•11.1114.111 A001•I F[R. VOL , , _I_wur CC • suT• 16 • BURLINGTON NORTHERN . -z• • FILE NO. 8SP - 014-92 - A BJNDING SITE PLAN _ =, ,. UTILITIES - ORIGINAL PLAT - OVERLAY •�: • SECTION 30• TWP. 23 N. • RGE.S E• WM. . SECTION 31 • TWP. 23 N. , RGE. 5 E E. WM. �•,,:: N • CITY Or tTENTON KING COUNTY WAS••INGTON `__ o- • • r0 CAMS COY a .0 M .r••c•.•stab• `. I I c•°� \ S.W. 34TH ST.. I/ .- i .1. 11•T•0'•r' r.:.' '.• sacs •-.. ..°.iv •_ 1 "G. .-. ..•..lo rT/ �. ._ ... ..r• .r10F' •.•.1. 1 •al nl t.. ..9•.w • __ i .w.. •'.A..0.0000. 1: . ' •1 ST"]0 l!.---- • -...r:as . I r . •.f100 I O 1•WICJ.t•son par', - _-_-' -t• , .0 1r. a.M1. I A E 4Pi.SIM ,I.o•1aU M.R•T : �r. t•ttm°1-••••: �fl- I I an.rb•• N•o. 1.1 I I•IN Or 1 �a.r I �•t a SP-378-79 :I I ...f1.......a1 i .I 1 8 I w PARCEL 8 1 ^'• I LOT I ! I / 1 i3 11• I 8 ; %-• LOT • p f I 10 • 8 ' / LOT I Ir .01,tl•0 I/ -1 i I a rl•C•If ` 'p No.O.l W.H II . yr•ra!^S . /I �C i ;f lac.K•CI M.NI Do Ir ,-i SCALE ' I. • 120 d6i ( 0 D0 120 • I.0 240 // r- I'• �i� .to MMf �:Q guar - . .-. - _ I _ /1 • �r `v_ ./ . : • I tr ttJCT.T.•1•arlT //.4P I I p•`4 J�/ I r• rut••••an I I • ••o a' ' `o'vaa.ir Ct.Y 10 q I u LICIT ova... •V •a / a.c•rm II••Oa. fr 9 am .11J.♦.awls..Y. I I .dam-( •••f ex...c•r. -J I •PICSMal ■W 1••Y.p11• ••Cf / •.. •.4T•y••••.a4 1 (•''.l a\' j 88 ' . ••a. UNIT..apt••Yro1J • r IS.Y'�/ . , ,�.'■'� • / ' T•. 1..I..•t•••.oL . -I- •tr_.L..•=_. + 41 be I • I,,II' I 4w •wt0 it �.� _ .. Tu TYITT.alas n••.ar 1,ry-, •�/C-j-t.1�to.Ctom �N • Ct T. 'Marl IC•I.ra. ♦ - -�--L �-. TSB 'Marl IC Signal MI 'U I to'•••l M.{f tY't A�r O'41Y �r t•I• r• .f1.......°... 0•f•tDO f•AN fDC11■1fff. J ••loos. fo'.ul•D.•.r,0,ea, I.• ur. .a.tac•w•.was•aYY W I l0'.flllr•me,A.[ l.1CJl'•�•'•- Mlnr..•.4..o00N..r • w .`.•e•un f ~: 1°�.i mo.~.rc�Nem1r•.v . I'� MONO:o..n.•■1.•COST • I C='9 > :i =r \.. l]�J. 4 I I = .•,r- . •• • a 11U +.��,y 2 ...SOS to IT •'. t•., • OM KM r7 Z ..r•. 1 oY IT 2 r J I. • •alt a•a f..•e.r'H:.11 �S h - 1 1 • • wm r-�"'•w l•+O.(Yr• fl..l••O.1 • w f M•o.Y t - T.1•■' *Kam. 00 C•aa.tt•.c a./� 1 •• - See Y I f.�J• I'- . 1 r.ai rRa•~au I me tt. 24a J L� ' • I W . . ICON 11••I •M• TO M MO.•RO•O • !b V•.11T•I■.f•Mt••W.VIO A I • i 1 a=••. .lC.MCfT{O. �_ tIOCYr[RT.I I, MOC••..m I Y . F...•�` 7 '_ _-• • _ _ 1• Ter. n.e.•w'lT'.-' IL I • l:;w'N.••• .�. p LOT 1. - . r •' \J leas..••.{ �i' I I 3 i • - I'l1 +��•Ctn laid rt•1 71..111 .If • 1 ..• qfn •c•n ' 1 II,... • /� 3 o -� % . 1 t\ . ...n.un rya•0•t: - r L . . • I I.of•or•of- ; . a.•no.T tm.a� v S �. I i.�w,� `\�`. p o n.t mcw..•. I Q • to'••n.o.o•s.r CO'.••• _8 • 'a L• 517....... Asa a WWII TOM CO MC.n I C C . ' sass t w I - ]c. 7p. I n w:_ ttc �p __T • • I frc N - ---■tc 1. - .' PO•{..o.•.o CO•••I.•^••. =a LOT 2 L.L.A-0L6-85 I I • f••.Mfr sass ... N••K I N'•WIMi ft.f•d .0.g.p.•plpamq •WS,Or•• .Y Tr., •ROt•u r•._rI•T NH=-+l L N•I • • V aaK...('ti. • a•Vr..ID•0..♦oI•-.t•m., �r.r,vr 5 LOT oAi i ? LOT .►. . :1 '. I.• I\, 8;. t';IQR8fstMn1.r.•c.o'rnur• taa.t•r ill sa6a1' I 4 . 1„]ice to°ra "e]l.omo.t�~a oqf •CMa •I -o.m.CMf a ::: fN{�L•- '.1 l t..'7r Or f •..�"'r.. .t••vs.% .I•('\il S.W. :1ST ST. •`•:.'.s�.zr'M'.7.111.. I . I 000101001 . - PICTD RECORDS • • VOL_ ® PAC,E C IOiOLL IA/? COMPANY,INC • SEATTLE • ."Gas' 161 BURLINGTON NORTHERN .aat.•fta`.•w: YCa 4011.100~ma. • OKI Ytty.t•..- ' ..r • Wf•Yr••.e• • 1"'�•04. FILE NO. BSP - 014-92 _ A- BIND• ING SITE PI AN : , 1.01116 U•.•r •l•If[a•taaa • PARCEL CONFIGURATIONS ^' runic•" ' SECTION 30, TW P. 23 N. , RGE.S E, W.AL ..". r••rralw'��1•aw ra SECTION 3I TWP. 23 N. ,. RGE. S E, W.II "' ••'r Y•a • _-- Yra111 C.•tr.. - N CITY OF RENTON KING COUNTY WASMINGTON • I .o CAMS CC.o I OS..• rwo..•.. •.. .r.K,•IN.r.o` I uxomc rc \ S.W.• 34 TH ST •T_,f••¢ra • • C 9 • /..•rf•••os. ,•,•o .eom' I e: 9 r... ::y�O0 T . r I -a...sou"r--�- !1 —�•r-aosl .--- w' •..«fi ;I b'a•.••rA.a.un lrl ; �.•r.p st'+�, t: I ft E I I .00 S KSr.drrc K•Q.1 ••f oo 1 'i . II t.nr..¢••..w :jl I i !b I •o• Ii � i :1 I an.r.•TWA { • LOT I `: 8 ! j ..111 . LOT I I . 61: .:;11 w „ a - : 6 �� LOT ...C•1• / J •••e.o.r 1e. I. y ' +/ I - SCALE , I'-. 120' . Z E i o `� f o•.t•a y.� 01.•t•a rr has • o eo to ieo rlol � � I 1•. •n •.c•u -,IZ . It i IS' •• o • f; ,_1L -r • •f• .4. courts in warmerCr•_ /.rt.S° .f lie �i', -Z -ur 1•L -6 • ' =I to'Yr.witirl w.t 2 ••errre4—�---- --•�..i — --�,--••.-so•r a-. Q '= w I I aura••nr CrCY•.141. �- ••tos..1 - I I alirori.SSA?.o0 I Ia••4a.•• _ • et: Z I Y .... coo...m. o I I I • Z Y w • .�:; I I . i = • • Y - Q 1 ji! • e : a LOT \III -f " I g`fa - L • v- 1 • --I::J Zo o€ : i u LOT i r— I a —+ _U i I =. • > 1 Wk.,'fair a•1 I . laaM 10 .t. I L——-.es!=-—i I. S ot.v•..•rto.ar I -.Y•q M [ - In Ii •♦. '' I 6 • I w = a•„ DETAIL �• I I I W I-.>0 I. I f I 1 • o ... I '..+r•i • LOT L-tR-9C Ts'N if, `\i:•yi r'• �-�vC -.eefu •t ar.III se rr �:d•""%'?7 A \` ' .\� 1•x.[•n r r ..ir• 'CO ��`•••• � •. • z k ,_4,•� ,..x. ;4. 1 44` - (Ail/ 4d . d q N.Ur•13.1 p.t • N L a.sr woe\ R$ I •p u.c.,lo n..®ar it �a �'twn. A.,ommemer. _Ai u�^: 1 IQY10.0•.4.1Of•••K•w.1_ -may bj I 1 I� A. I_ �w—•.rpm•. . I ••waMr .trYa K•f6•O.•.0.0•OOre —••••••'••• •', . h' _ �l.a .ecru.vrnm ux.f•r r••r•-••� '••r. —• 1 0 f • m�.otN..77.6..ata WO.•f10.0..•CO r..•C01Y1X1 —. ''�'� aK.r,..1.• •10 1wt• sf� I ILOT 8'1 I LOT 1 rM K•••r CO.sec.. • R I IS 6 "II•7 If? 4 s`R r • h.- r• . .;�L•__ r.,Virtu, rl,•t'l.t.•Y•fel • •••.1 .••q:.; _-.•••Y�.-.(. _rf.Y •.'•I�•r .r l`Q I - _ 01. Ol•. • we61,0•.,..••. ••.^.m .,,.' ; • •.or1••, m..1....0 CO..... S.W. 41 ST ST .cu.x o mass.o r.1 �..a usm m.c.a . i I ...0.•.•..C/. 61.0 00•e o a,w..[n •,•.1 f.•+rw M.Kr.o I.. & 7 1 •CL O..0 u. C.•C MC.a •.O•.t•001 ravlo•m•I Ifr...C.A. r R.Ctfl 1 W EASthsFrll . The Gxentor, GLACIER PARE: COMP"NY, o Minnesota corporation; herein- after coiled Grantor, for Gild in consideration of Ten and no''100 Dollars (S10.03) to it paid, and the ogreernents herein contained, does hereby grant to BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter called Granter, ur. ruse/he..I . for rouirood purposes upon the following described premiss situated in King County, Washington: Parcel 1 - All that part of the SEi SW21 of Section 25, Township 23 North, .• , Ronge 4 East W.M., lying east of the,100 foot right of way of . Burlington'Northern Inc., north of the :.,uth line of said section, west of a line parallel to and 267 feet east of the east line of . ;\; said,100 foot right of way and southwesterly of o line lying 20 .� - feet northeasterly measured parallel and rodioily and all That part of Lot 7, Block 9, Burlington Nor Ind Pk Renton II recorded -0 in King County records July 24, 1979, under 17907240890 lyii,g southwesterly o.' line lying 20 feet northeasterly measured parallel and rodiolly.from the following described centerline: - Beginning at headblock of No. 16 turnout at Engineer Survey Station 997+37.7 = 0+00; thence southerly through said No. 16 - . turnout to the left of Stemco Spur Track to beginning of curve at 'Station 1.61.5; thence•along a 6° curve to'the left•through an -.angle of 2° 24' to a point of reverse curve at Station 2+01; thence along o 6° 00' curve to the right through an angle of 5° 59' to Station 3+00.7 to end of curve and point of tangent; thence . sn!'theriy along said t=gent to point of curve at Station 6 '65.4; • thence along 7° 30' curve to the left through on angle of 6° 22' to Station'7+50.3 to end of curve and pair' of tangent; thence olong said tangent to beginning of curve at Station 7+67.6;'thence southeasterly along 13° 14' curve to the left through an angle of . 40° 04' to end of curve ot Station 10-770.4; thence along o tangent to heodblock at Station 10-96.6 = 0-00 of leod trnck to Orillio . Industrial Pork; thence along a No. 9 turnout to the left to heel of frog and beginning of curve ot Station 0-81 .9; thence southeasterly an-1 easterly along a 12° 30' curve to the left thrr.ugh on angle of ` 36° 48' 35" to end of curve and point of tangency at Station 3.76.4; . thence easterly 100 feet along said tangent parallel to one; disloi.ce 35 feet from the south line of Section 25, Township 23 North. Range 4 East W.M. and end of centerline and description. Parcel 2 - Railroad r:3hts of way situated in Sections 30 and 31, Township 23 North, Range 5 Eost W.M., located all within the plat of Burlington Northern Orillia Industr:ol Pork of Renton Division I, recorded in King County records 9-25-78 under 17809250902. • Parcel 3 .. Railroad rights of way situated in Section 30, Township 23 North, _ Flange 5 East W.M. and Section 25, Township 23 North, Konge 4 East W.M., located all within said plat of Burlington Nor'Ind ?k Renton I1. ' . . '.',.� - • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has corned this instrumelo Pa be executt\l b) its proper officers and its cor;sorute seal to be hereunto allixed this 13th out of October , 1981 .3LACIER PARK COMPANY By • 'ram , 1 :� ene/:".,_ President • Attest: Jo' - "-' •' c Asistont Secretory CV STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 ss. County of Ramsey On this 13th day of October , 1981, before me personally appeared J. C. Kenody and IL J: Morin tame known to be President and Assistant Secretary-of the corporation that executed the within and foreooing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my officio; seal the day and year first above written. -. r Notary Public in and for the State of Minnesota, residing o; St. Paul. Retutc to: Mr. R.D. Larson, Manager a t1DC .ofproperty Management, Burlington Northern R.R. �LED tr ?� at RQQ� Roost 720 Central Building . . Seattle, Washington 98104 avti.1. a • • • • • �•S t • • St • w . • ( S 1 T t ..0 PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT L. 1 THIS INDENTURE,made this 9rd day of March, 1992, by and between the BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY(formerly Burlington Northern Inc.),a Delaware corporation,GRANTOR,and BURIINGTON 8 • NORTHERN RAILROAD PROPERTIES INC.,a Delaware corporation ,of 1011 Western Avenue,Seattle,Washington 98104,GRANTEE, •. .. I WHEREAS,by Easement recorded in King County as Document No. 8110210541,Glacier Park Compaq ',a Minnesota corporation'(predecessor in 1 i interest to Burlington Northern Railroad Properties Inc).granted unto Burlington - Northern Railroad Company an easement for railroad purposes including the right to ,` construct,maintain and improve railroad trackage over certain property located in _•. the Orillia Industrial Park of Renton,Division 1,Ring County,Washington; (1�{ WHEREAS,GRANTOR no longer requires.a portion of said easement far . _ _ _M ._ D . _ railroad purposes and is willing to release unto GRANTEE all of its right,title and ,, interest in and to that portion of said easement; o NOW THEREFORE,the GRANTOR,for and in consideration of the sum of g C,—= One and No/100 Doll Irs($1.00),to it in hand paid,the receipt of which is hereby ,. �NN acknowledged,does hereby gUITCLAIM and RELEASE unto the GRANTEE,all • O of its right.,title and interest in and to a portion of said easement shown shaded on the ! 2 : NO attached Exhibit'B",which said portion of easement shown on said Exhibit'B" encumbers the real property legally described on the attached Exhibit"A",both —1. 0 attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; . O) IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said GRANTOR has caused this instrument to be signed by its Director Operations,attested by its Assistant Secretary,and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed on the day and year first above written. . I BURLINGTON NORTHERN i RAILROAD COMPANY 1i BY . X, At'iJ? - Ii B.L.Nic o s Director Operations ! 1 ATTE 'I': , ,q • BY . asquez Assistant Secretary . . EXCISE TAX NOT RE(' •kED • -X1',Co Records 's..i. n _ / • 7/"P -. _ - -- * I ( . InfielniveS • 1. . • W 1 1 .,.., • 1 „ ,,,,_ J. ,. . STATE OF TEXAS ) i ..., )ss. ' i ! ►. COUNTY OFTARRANT ) 4 • •. ~ 9 On this 3rd day of March,1992,before me personally came B.L.Nichols, rx Director Operations,and V.H.Vasquez,Assistant Secretary,of the above named J,_ + corporation,Burlington Northern Railroad Company,who art to me known to be �'w such Director Operations and Assistant Secretary of said corporation and II - N= acknowled • ged that they executed the foregoing instrument as such officers and as J o the free act and deed of said corporation by its authority. 0 ...,...., L.:,.. 14_,_u '' a W I- n •; '1 o• Notary Public. ,' an►-- My commission expires: l Zf 24 /4__ ,.t. :y. Q ARUM t�CilOi.t _.. ._ :I '''. • r t z= r— • Mao Who«r.... W MyOr.r r,'aim Ws 10.4M J W p 70 ^1 I..,J V) • am..1--, Cr- .+ Q) 'i g F j.• i •, t • !r • . . 4 1 i I 1 • .4 ti J ' • • • EXHIBIT A z ' • J 1--- J L.•.1 M .J U • J � C PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN ORILLIA INDUSTRIAL PARK OF RENTON DIVISION c)' I, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 108 OF PLATS, PAGES 12 AND 13, RECORDS•OF • r ! KING COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • -� - •LOTS 1, 2, 3,. 8, 7 AND 8 1N.BLOCK 2:• z a -. - TOGETHER WITH LOT 2 OP CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA-016-85 RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 860213900] : C\J . O AND TOGETHER WITH ALL OF THE RAILROAD RIGHTS-OP-WAY LYING ADJACENT TO LOTS 1, CV 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 AND 9 IN SAID BLOCK 2 AND ADJACENT TO LOTS I AND 2 OF CITY Cr) OP RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LIJI-016-85 RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY NO RECORDING NO. 8602139001: AND ADJACENT TO PARCELS A AND B OF SHORT PLAT NO. • C) 378-79, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7909249003: '-' SITUATE IN THE CITY OP RENTON. COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. • PARCEL 8: PARCEL B OF SHORT PLAT NO. 378-79, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY NECORDING NO. 7909249001; SITUATE IN THE CITY UF RENTON. COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. I _ • • • -.. _ — 3 ; NOTICE: IF THE DL�UMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE -••• I IT IS OJE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. .�. ,,' I 9203200273 • r-______•� LI1JO AVE),IUE` • . , El I \ I I I I q A p II r o itli k..I • D . .... U1 m• A• I I. 111 x I '" • N - _ � �\ CO IV 1lill'i . . CI \\:4t U .� tit- m r r IN) tk 5 ) . 8 rioi g) . . [1'. Z 1 D I . / I, n CAST •VALLI�Y •H1�9\NAY & :3Fm.___ • : - Basigailliiillgam 11 - it - i 1 . 1 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: • 1 ! Office of the City Clerk Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 I • $ABEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL N OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE k N_ For and in consideration of Ten Dollars and other good and ! valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, C the GRANTOR, POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, a Washington general I • partnership, hereby conveys and quitclaims to the GRANTEE, THE CITY I OF RENTON, a municipal corporation of King County, Washington, a N5 perpetual, non-exclusive easement for traffic signal operations and i. 03 w4 maintenance over, upon and under the surface of the real property CD located in King County, Washington, more particularly described in i ' attached exhibit A, incorporated herein by this reference (the 04 "Easement Property") . ! Sc . The Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right, Ca without prior notice or proceeding at law, at such times as may be I C CD necessary, to enter upon the Easement Property for the purpose of • 04 constructing, maintaining, repairing, or altering, or making any I � connections with the traffic signal system to be located on the I Easement Property,' without incurring any legal obligations or liability therefore; provided, that any such construction, maintenance, repairs or alterations shall be accomplished in such I a manner that the private improvements existing on the Easement Property or any other property of Grantor shall not be disturbed or ! _ damaged, and if disturbed or damaged will be replaced in as good a condition as they were immediately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. I a Grantor shall have the right to fully use and enjoy the o Easement Property, including the right to use the surface of the Easement Property if such use does not 'interfere with the installation, use and maintenance of the traffic signal system on the Easement Property. The Grantor may construct a road over the Easement Property but shall not erect any buildings or structures I over, under or across the Easement Property as long as the traffic 12 system on the Easement Property is in existence. This Easement I x shall terminate if the traffic signal system on the Easement Property is ever permanently abandoned by the Grantee. I0 0 UTSI' OF 175<,/005:6/29/92:D4f516 IRAFOR RECORD AT REQ�•:CECO. —1— F11�D INSL'r u NEg]CATITZE e. NE Pow-CMtl.E.t 320 108th A P.O. BOX 1493 J L_- Bellevue, WA `� m ? EY: ( ?� J.. a.. TIE 1 If';f'M 1009 _ . . . . 0 • This Easement is a covenant running with the land and shall be binding on Grantor, its successors and assigns. Grantor covenants that it is the lawful owner of the Easement Property and has the good and lawful right to execute this Easement. DATED this c7‘, day of June, 1992 POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership By 1 . Powe 1, r 1 Partner X By P ter W. Powell, General Partner • • • • GO -2- 1754/005:6/23/92:061516 Pow-Orl L.En. • Ffl ) BB: • RANalaa Triii • • • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF RING • On this ...2(.0 day of 94,e--'41----1 , 1992, before me, a Notary • Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Lloyd W. Powell, to me known to be the General Partner of Powell-Orillia Associates, a Washington general partnership, the partnership named in and which executed the foregoing instrument; and he acknowledged to me that he signed the same as the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing before me and making this acknowledgment is the person whose true signature appears on this document. WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and year in' this certificate above written. 1ANICE TSCHMACHER Notary SH NOT PUBLIC in and for e e f STATE rnrriMoo wAwcbr a • at Washington, residing at July My commission expires: 7•//2•4, CD t'7 ' CD O C�2 • I � -3- 1754/005:6/23/92:DM516 Pow-Orll.EW _ f'i' g: 72 ,°l"4 TEE , 1 dr 411P .i . . , , . . .,,_ 1 , . . _. . . . .. . . . . EXHIBIT A BUSH. ROED& HITCHINGS, INC. Legal Description for Traffic Signal Easement • SIGNALIZATION EASEMENT DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF LOT 7 OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN, A��C��C//ORDOINGBTO ODING BINDING SITE PLAN THEREOF RECORDED INRVOLUMES / KING CODIN, SITE PLANS, PAGES Q THROUGH )�__, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBE6 FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTH 01°50 ' 09" EAST 18.00 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING RADIUS � "ET (A WEST) ; ADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID BEGINNING BEARS SOUTH 0054 '35 THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY 109 . 33 FE THENCE NORTH 1D 6°53'17E" WESTOUGH A 173.08 FEET AL TO ANGLE T ALONG TO THEBEGIN- 52 12 12 09 ; NING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 100 FEET;H O•UGH A CENTRALN ANGLE NORTHWESTERLY W12 22f'37"2 TO9 THE2 E ALONGET TRUE P INT OF BEGINS THRO • NING; • THENCE SOUTH 40°44'07" WEST 19.96 FEET ALONG A LINE RADIAL TO THE PRECEDING CURVE TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT A CURVE RAD CONCAALVE VE TO THE SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 35. 19 FEET THROUGH SAID BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 15°34'21" EAST) ; SAIDC CURVET THROUGH OAI CENTRAL LANGLE OFY AND U93°44 /10" TO A 5 .57 E ALONGET POINT OF CUSP ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7; O THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES: THENCE NORTH 11°50' 11" EAST 43.34 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A • L- CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 806.74 FEET; N THENCE NORTHERLY 65.87 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL O ANGLE OF 04°40'41" TO A POINT OF CUSP WITH A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE C7 NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH • CD SAID POINT OF CUSP BEARS NORTH 82°50'29" WEST) ; CD .i C1j THENCE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY 43.16 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE Q' THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 70°39 '02" TO THE BEGINNING OF A RE- VERSE CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 135.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 33.52 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CEN- TRAL ANGLE OF 14°13 '38" TO A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE WHICH BEARS NORTH 40°44 '07" EAST; . THENCE SOUTH 40°44 ' 07" WEST 15. 00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. . SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 2,376 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. 01.11 A.1i1C, ./ pwtisy� �O POWELL DEVELOPMENT 3 ADO �g BURLINGTON NORTHERN BSP , IT WILLIAM A. HICKOX, P.L.S. BRH JOB NO. 91407.08/SUR54B 6 L zs-9z JUNE 25, 1992 ' Fla n ,r II IiN n innA • . . . , ,.. . air . Aiii4._._ . • ! . . , . . . .. , • . . . . • , . _ . . .. • • . •. . SIGNALIZATION EASEMENT SKETCH PREPARED FOR POWELL DEVELOPMENT CO. , 1:e°111):11- A' 70-39'oz• m SEALPI Q' 4.3 798 9 O� d° 14`13'38" .1S'ING-C i Q \�\ R=/35' 1 A'04o40, " L,33.52' R' 806.74' 5 40'44'07'W(R) /5.00' L' 65.87' d '12'22'37• tz' i20' i L 25.92' D hi m / ......,,,....._ ..,.... : =s40'44'07^W(R) /9.96' It T.P, 0.2. 1••50' r\ 4'93'44'10" \z.%?'„ \' R' 35./9' •` L' 57.57' v LOT - • o Burling/on Northern %\\LN).. 7 Site Plan j61 VoL , Pgs. _ 44,1 . 1 ".?p. <./,.9 • pR. R. R.D.W. 11.1 Os, JI,M A.Iv o C7 IP ��• e wtisy\'�p� N s i, - ' - 0% i_ ..: BUSH,ROED&HITCHINGS,INC. ., - 1 CIVIL ENGINEERS&LAND SURVEYORS �j, 2Q77 -t;�S-1Z morns.,Mf►MOIOM 321d1N . �!J '�L� LAP CLC rr.l 4M07. a .AIE ffi,1�2 44VAL urn) 1 f dill EXPIRES yni.1 Fla EY: . °V r Sk. .P,1:A TITI� . IIM 1q4) • ^TICS: Ii THE DOCUh.-, Tom; . T. IS r::.I1.E IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE • 1 . i DUE TO is _ -JLiTY LF Tir: COCI~�:E�iT. . -.4-1--- • . . __ 7. _-r.....u.--.....- . .„.- . . t,„ , . 9:Z06302702 • a , 80 r l'. . • ,i) S8 [a.< . c �. �p� Oo �n� c ►ate ;i, OC7 m ►�+rtYC 9 CO F+ 9s� 7" S. aI. p� a Pl'A 5 1 -I . i i : . . I c' r l I y .. ti D al VI j 8 q.r a fix; is,..! - f 1 Yt WA ! i • ! ...n)' . I r, ti • I �. 1 1 1 / ! • _ • RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS �` 1 TABLE 07 CONTENT8 Page _ 1 ' RECITALS 1 . A. �iC Property 1 - B. Powell Property 1 C. Ehoubina Center 1 N D. Qmier 1 E. purpose W ARTICLE 1 - DETIXITION O! EXCLUSIVE BUILDING AREA AND COMMON 2 1 _ _AREA .. .. ,. - li ;.-'•-• 1 . 1.1 gxclusive Building Are&. . 2 Z • 1.2 Common Are& 2 /n . . 1.3 Conversion to-Common Are 2 It 1 ARTICLE 2 - USE 2 2.1 prohibited Uses 2 ►- I ; 2.2 Further Restrictions 3 2.3 permitted Uses 3 W •, CD 1v W ARTICLE BUILDINGS 4 �,eation. 4 /., (� 3.1 7 5 �' � O 3.2 Fire Protection 1.1 1, J•D f ,, 3.3 Dasaaae or Destruction 5 w 1` ARTICLE 4 - COMMON AREA USE = ..I 5 J�u.lt VL Ya Qi'WVT140 ® : ., 4.2 DI& 65 4,-,;'- 4.3 access 6 _i; (a) pc Barriers (b) Staaina for Construction 6 6 4.4 Limitations on Usfl ,, (a) Cuatomerfl 6 „•.i (b) Employees 7 7 (c) General c�-, (d) �_I�_gS� 7 4.5 Utility and Service Easement 7 7 _ 4.6 Scans 4.7 Qyt•eide Merchandising 8 ^' ARTICLE S - COMMON ARIA DEVELOPMENT S.1 peveloDment Timing 9 r • 1 ' y -i- . 11cw-•�..e.t 1Tr/00S1A/17/q:DY11• • • • . •. • • ' "r( '� _• i , , acessme ik--T'a'ri\.1Y�`",E_, *-A.' :v:::,;(4?!,1.'le`.g-!-v'.i`.r,v•;. -9t•y� ?:. !•17:;, �•„!,'+�.:....`.>: . .. - .. {"' 1 ARTICLE i - COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE 9 - 6.1 Naintenanc�aD�iard 9 6.2 Maintenance by Agent 10 ARTICLE 7 - INDEMNIFICATION, TUSURANCE 10 7.1 Owner's Indemnification . . 10 7.2 insurance 10 y 1: ARTICLE 8 - REALTY TAXES AND A88E88)E T8 11 8.1 Real Estate Taxes and Assessments '• ARTICLE 9 - EMINENT DOMAIN 11 9.1 Owner's Right to Award 11 9.2 Collateral Claims 11 • 9.3 Restoration of Common Areas 12 ; . IC-3 ARTICLE 10 - CANCELLATION, )CODIFICATION, DURATION 12 10.1 cancellation or Modification ' - - - ' 12• . - - - 10.2 Duration _.. ._ 12 4i ARTICLE 11 - RELEASE PROM LIABILITY 12 10- 11.1 Release from Liability - 12 • l'c •-• • ARTICLE 12 - DEPAULT 12 Incc 12.1 Default 12 • 12.2 Remedies for Default 12 • • ii:Vil 12.3 attorneys' Fees 14 ;N . 12.4 Governing Law 14 in :.1(.11 J� � ARTICLE 13 - NOTICES 14 is ir•'••11 13.1 Notices 14 -' • ' �SP.'PICL! 14 - L•Exnlese pg()T! Tzoli 5 I '' 14.1 Lender Protection 15 15 . 15 '-, p ARTICLE 15 - GENERAL PROVISIONS N 15.1 No Covenant to Overate . • D� 15.2 Running of Benefits and Servitudes. Rights of successors 15 15.3 Not a Public Dedication 15 t of 15.4 Document Execution and Chance 16 N. W1 15.5 po Joint Venture 16 call 15.6 Reasonableness p1_4G..`ent 16 • E"1' 15.7 Lot 1 • • 16 _I 15.8 c.Q u3t9iparla 16 . . 15.9 No Consents 17 15.10 Wetlands "'' 15.11 Lot 7 - 17 1'. -ii- 1 n</0u5 1e/t//97:aA 16 row-A9r•rr1 I 1 Jr �:.,," ti 1 ommpur .y=: w�::. : --: a-Ry,,�y7.4.4. a;r" ji , Yon#5 't-71 i":4.e:•. •',:: !''.:-.7 . Ilr....:.'yr...W:v�i.t=&3�i. •1Slk-�ti.'»: .({L?�r:4Y""fC !'rf+l r. RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT WIT$ • COVENANTS. CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS . l This Reciprocal Easement Agreement with Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions ("Agreement") is made this 30th day of June, 1992, between ECAA Realty Corp., a Washington corporation ("HC") and • i Powell-orillia Associates, a Washington,,.. general partnership ("Powell") . RECITALS: .,) A. $C Pro>,srtY. HC is the fee owner of Lots 2 and 3 as legally described on Exhibit A'to this Agreement ("HC Property") and as shown on the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit $ ("Site Plan") . Such Lots may be referred to in this Agreement separately - - _ as "Lot 2" and !'Lot..3".. . _ _ _ _ F- _ - . i • B. Powell Property. Powell is the fee owner of Lots 1, 4, - • 6 and 7 as legally described on Exhibit C to this Agreement i i ("Powell Property") and as shown on the Site Plan .att'ched hereto as Exhibit B. Such -lots may be referred to in this Agreement 5 separately as "Lot 1", "Lot 4", "Lot 6" and "Lot 7". The reference ►- in this Agreement to any "lot" in the Shopping Center shall refer cc N to each of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7. O u i C. $hopoina Center. The HC Property and the Powell Property ✓I`'': shall be referred to collectively as the "Shopping Center" in this 4/1ID O .I o c Agreement. i 1- 1 CD D. Owner. The term "Owner" as used herein shall mean and • ` ,F refer to each person or entity which holds fee title to any portion 1 Cr, of the Shopping Centpr' rnd any successor of such person or entity i • ' acquj.ring said fee title from such person or entity. The term ;, ,, "Owner", unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, shall not 3 include any lender, trust deed beneficiary or mortgagee, nor any i lessee, tenant or occupant of space in the Shopping Center. - E. purpose. HC and Powell desire that the HC Property and the Powell Property be developeu subject to the easements and the covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth in this Agreement. c AGREEMIIT$ • W In consideration that- the following encumbrances shall be - binding upon the parties hereto and shall attach to and run with the HC Property and the Powell Property, and shall be for the • .� benefit of and shall be limitations upon all future Owners of the HC Property and the Powell Property and that all easements herein set forth shall be appurtenant to the dominant estates, and in : + consideration of the promises, covenants, conditions, restrictions, 1 • -1- • 1r,4/OOSIA/17/4ntDvf1A OKLA-Apr,rrl i 1 • q./,.. .;:: . .l:.;1 .,�,.1;j�/ � a}•�;!sir•?': .)••--ti 1 '?72.tf.P.. ... --;-,,;-.7,l .0 A. .l( In • easements and encumbrances contained herein, HC and Powell do • hereby agree as follows: , • t TERNS 1 1 • ARTICLE 1 -.DEFINITION OP EXCLUSIVE BUILDING AREA AND CONNON AREA I 1.1 exclusive Buildina Area. "Exclusive Building Area" as used - herein shall mean those portions of the HC Property and the Powell Property devoted from time to time to building improvements , (including canopies, roof overhangs, supports and other tououtward ard 1 extensions not exceeding twelve (12) feet in depth) , may change from time to time, as provided in this Agreement. "Building Service Areas" as used herein shall mean truck•docks, compactor pads, utilities pads, pallet storage areas and receiving jv • - _ .areas_and similar 'service areas and•facilities constructed solely I�- for_.the use of the building located within the Exclusive Building - 11 = • Area. j v, • • 1= 1.2 Common Area. "Common Area" shall be all of the Shopping . ~ Center except the Exclusive Building Area, Building Service Areas, is •and outdoor sales areas (as described and permitted in Section 4.7 r=- of this Agreement) as the same may change from time to time as 1< • provided in this Agreement. JW J CD 1.3 Conversion to Common Areg. Subject to the rights of Owners ® ,,, under this Agreement, those portions of the Exclusive Building Area 1..,� G and Building Service Areas on the HC Property and the Powell • -'' C', Property which are not from time to time used or cannot.under the I--" terms of this Agreement be used for buildings shall become part of • I""' p the Common Area for the uses permitted hereunder. An area N converted to .Common Area may be converted back -to Exclusive • 1�.: On Building Area by its development as Exclusive Building Area, if, at ' .' the time of conversion back to Exclusive Building Area, it does not violate any of the terms of this Agreement. i . .' ARTICLE 2 - USE 2.1 prohibited Uses. The Owners recognize their respective • customers' need for adequate parking facilities in close proximity I �,., to their premised and the importance of protecting such parking a o facilities against unreasonable or undue encroachment which is i _1,1 likely to result from long term parking by patrons or employees of tta` certain types of business establishments. As a consequence -; . . thereof, the Owners covenant and agree that no part of the Powell Property shall be devcte.a to the use or operation of a mortuary, theater, carnival, bowling alley, 'skating rink, amusement center, .1k , ., • electronic .or mechanical games arcade, pool or billiard hall, . • betting parlor, bingo parlor or health club, and no part of the - { Shopping Center shall be devoted to the use or operation of a • . -2- NCVA•A�r.,w1 175</OOS,♦/ff/V2tOVS1A 1 l 1 /, -;) . .1 1-•1 r-^ • • pornographic shop, adult book store, nightclub, or dance hall, or a tavern, cocktail lounge or any facility for the on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages except as an incidental part of the operation of a restaurant or other food-related estab Ishment. Each owner agrees to maintain on its own property' parking of five • stalls for each 1,000 square feet of Floor eAr iced ea on such Owner's property, or the number of parking spacesrequired by applicable law, whichever is greater. 'Floor Areaw...as used herein shall mean the total number of square feet of floor area in the building, except that Floor Area of outside sales areas and of mezzanines and basements not open to customers and incidental to ground floor i retail operations shall not be counted. The Floor Area of any building shall be measured from the outside face of all exterior walls and the center line of party or common walls. During any 1 period of rebuilding, repairing, replacement or reconstruction of ,,, a building, the Floor Area of that building shall be deemed to be t, . - the same as existed immediately prior to that period. o • = 2.2 yurther Restrictions. Except for the HC Property, ho bu ld-.ng of any size on Lot 1, and no building on Lots 4, 6 and 7 which has . .� less than twenty thousand .(20,000) square feet of floor Area, or • 1 any portion of a , building which has been segregated for a i= • particular user and which contains less than twenty thousand • il- (20,000) square feet of Floor Area, shall be used for the purpose oc of selling home improvement, items, including without limitation Jt2 N lumber, hardware items, decor, fashion electrics, fashion plumbing, ""), . • O floor coverings, millwork, window coverings, plumbing supplies, +, :-' electrical supplies, paint, wallpaper, siding, ceiling fans, ,In �)J 04 gardening supplies and patio lurniturer provided that the CD restrictions in this Section 2.2 shall. not apply to sales of such i , i CI items where such sales are incidental to other nonprohibited uses �►=a O and the gross receipts to the user from such prohibited uses, individually or in the aggregate, do not exceed ten percent (101) ® ! « of the total gross receipts for all sales by such user on an annual •�1-- basis. Each user's sales shall be calculated separately. p.' :7otwithstanding the foregoing, the restrictions in this Section 2.2 shall not apply to (a) the following users: Best; Smith's Hume Furnishings; Krause's; Office Club; Office Depot; PetSmart; Pacific Linen; Circuit City; Future Shop; Magnolia Hi-Fit' Pier 1, or (b) to a. CD any other user which sells a product mix substantially similar to 7,6-- the product mix sold by any of the foregoing listed entities as of o W G the. date oi' this Agreement. Gl _ 2.3 permitted Uses. 'Subject to the terms of this Agreement, t. . • typical shopping center retail, office and service uses shall ne permitted, including without limitation fast food restaurants (with drive-through windows) and banks or other financial institutions (with drive-through lanes) . - II -3- i1754/007:6/17/92t0oI516 - _ %CVA &gr.trl • • a • 717tTICLE 3 - BUILDINGS 3.1 Location. Notwithstanding the general depiction on the Site Plan attached as Exhibit b of building areas on some of the lots in the Shopping Center, no Owner shall have any restrictions under • this Agreement on where a building may be located on an Owner's property or where Common Area shall be, except for the following: (a) Any building on Lot 7 may only be located within • that portion of Lot 7 which is crosshatched and designated "Lot 7 Building Area" on the Site Plan attached as Exhibit B. (b) Any building on Lot 3 must be more than twenty (20) feet from the north property lines of Lots 4 and 6 and twenty (20) feet from the east property line of Lot 4. • W (c) Any building on_Lots 4 or 6 of the Powall Property • must be at•least twenty (20) fest-from the north property lines of - - Lots 4 and 6 and twenty (20) 'feet from the east•property line of • 1= Lot4. i = (d) The first buildings constructed for long-term use on each of Lots 2 and 3 must be located substantially to the west of i' • the north-south drive aisle line designated as "Initial Building {< Area" on the Site Plan attached as Exhibit B. HC and Powell agree (`�� N that after the first such buildings are so constructed, any ".J p replacement buildings or expansion of existing buildings may be r. located anywhere on such Lots 2 and 3 so long as such buildings .:; (�j otherwise comply with any restrictions set forth in this Agreement. O (e) Any building on Lot 1 must be located on the • "- O northerly half of Lot 1. • CD 01 (f) All improvements in the Shoppin7 Center must comply • with applicable governmental requirements. (g) The curb cuts and access areas on the north property lines of Lots 4 and 6 and the east property line of Lot 4 as drawn on the Site Plan attached as Exhibit E cannot be relocated, o diminished or impaired. 1- u • g (h) No change can be made to the access driveway along . the the north property line of Lot 2 or the access driveway between • ? "' Lots 4 and 6, all as drawn on the Site Plan attached as Exhibit D. • (i) HC shall at all times provide reasonable access from the driveway markod as "Access Driveway" at the north of Lot 2 to the access driveway between Lots 4 and 6 also marked "Access Driveway" as shown on the Site Plan attached as Exhibit E and • generally in a north-south direction, provided such general north- • • _4_ 1/54/00516/17/O7:D1h1A 111044-Agr.rr1 . • Larrigrnagi_nliammimpripapt rr 1 iormutsur south access may be reasonably located upon any portion of the HC Property. t 3.2 Fire Protection. Any building constructed on the Shopping Center with a gross building area, including mezzanines and basements, of twenty thousand square feet (20,000) or more, must be constructed with an automatic sprinkler system for fil'a protection. _All other buildings. in the Shopping Center must be constructed, L? maintained and used in a manner which will preserve the sprinklered insurance rate obtained on any building required to have an automatic sprinkler system. 1 3.3 pamace or Destruction. In the event of any damage to or destruction of any building in the Shopping Center, the Owner of the parcel upon which such building is located, at its election, at its "sole cost and risk and with al: due diligence, shall either (i) • u . _ restore or replace such building, subject to the provisions of this - - Agreement,. or (ii) raze and remove all parts of said -damaged or ' - 1;:: = destroyed building then ' remaining and- the' • debris resulting 4.13 ' ' -therefrom and ,othervise clean and restore the Exclusive Building Area affected by such casualty to a level and clean condition; 1*: provided that all parking and access on such parcel shall be a restored to its pre-casualty condition. lx 'c'44 ARTICLE 4 - CO)O(ON AREA USE IJ i N, ' 4., SrAnt of Easements. Each Owner, as grantor, hereby grants ' "' r solely to the other Owners only for the benefit of said other JJ ( Ownera and their respective tenants, and such Owners' and tenants' :I p customers, invitees and employees, a nonexclusive easement for '"'1_. c roadways, walkways, ingress and egress, access, the parking of � Jlyl-• Cd motor vehicles and use of facilities installed for the comfort and O convenience of customers, invitees and employees on the Common Area 1 C4 of the HC Property and the Powell Property, as more particularly • �>>— located and described on the attached Site Flan, as the same may �� grant of easement is not . � change from time to time. The foregoing •'- 't effective as to any lot which is part of the Shopping Center until construction is commenced on such lot. 4.2. jjla. Subject to existing easements of record and the terms of - this Agreement, the Common Area shall be used for roadways, 4, walkways, ingress and egress, access, parking of motor vehicles, n loading and unloading of commercial and other delivery vehicles, • _,^. for driveway purposes, and for the comfort and convenience of customers, invitees and employees of all businesses ane occupants of the buildings constructed on the Exclusive Building Area. No 1i . long-term parking, park-and-ride, or storage of motor vehicles is 1 .� permitted. - ' 1 1 . —5— ucvn-Mr.n.t . 1754/02516/17/v21DYl16 • .. . :._. .. :' i'• , .Q , : ;�.•,., -. • - '7r% x I.ni.- ikliMrITIN • . • i 4.3 Access. (a) , • No walls, fences, or barriers of any kind I shall be constructed or maintained on the Common Area, the auny portion thereof, by any party which shall prevent or impairfreee or exercise of any of the easNenitsut anteddation in, or,edestrian and access and movement, including Powell Property; _ - : ' i vehicular traffic between the.HC Property and the Powe ll provided, however, reasonable traffic controls, as maytall necessary to guide and control the orderly flow of traffic, may be .l so long as access driveways to the parking areas in the Common Area are not closed or blocked. The only exception to this provision shall be (i) for changes to the Exclusive Building Area and Common • Area permitted by this Agreement, and (ii) for incidental encroach- ments by an Owner upon the Common niArArea mayof an�nuOOwnr ner'srprope of,tor as provided d this Agreement, storefont barricades and similar . . ; use of the ladders, .scaffoldir. _ o ..facilities resulting in temporary obstruction of the Common Area, Z all of which are permitted hereunder so Tong as•their•use is kept �+ within reasonable requirements of - construction work being . • = expeditiously pursued by an Owner on its property, or as provided �Z in this Agreement. i- (b) ptagina for Constructi411• Powell agrees that HC may temporarily use Lot 1 for HC's staging during the initial W construction of the building on Lot 2. HC agrees that Powell may i CD temporarily use that portion of Lot 3 to the east of the Site • �, 4 as `.' CV crosshatched and designated as "Powell initial Staging construction of the `•, c, O Plan attached as nibibit 5 duringI ''"' on Lot 6. HC may-relocate the J J � � building on Lot 4 and the building rt to a reasonable =: CD staging area for Lots 4 or 6 of the Powell Props y ,y N alternate location so long as such staging area is of substantially 17 t,. the same size and is not significantly more inconvenient to Powell I ! "' than where the staging area was previously located. lanes pan rty using a staging area (i) shall t obstruct es�are eay access in a neat and clean . .J Common Area; (ii) shall keep 9 g ' condition during its use; (iii) shall leave the staging area in a neat and clean condition at the end of its use; (iv) shall use the stagingarea only fory minimum claim to the mother e necessary party the . construction; and (v) shall '-..� T benefitted party'• rights under this Section 4.3(b) staginge o W construction is completed on the property o area is provided. W 4.4 imitations on Use. (a) Customers. Customers and invitees shall not be permitted to pperk on the Common Area except while shopping or transacting business in the Shopping Center. •• r /'i , -6- • • 17)4 00514/17/07:O 516 IICW•Aer..vi• • i ii i n (b) Employeed. Employees shall not be permitted to park on • t',.a Common Area, except in the Common Area on an Ovnes.'a property where the Owner has designated such as "employee parking". The 1 Owners from time to time may mutually designate and approve "employee parking areas", however, if they do not, each Owner may • formally or informally designate "employee parking areas" un its • own parcel for use by sue!: Owner's employees or the employees of . such Owner's tenar_ts. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no employee parking for the HC Property shall be permitted in the area which represents generally the row of parking immediately adjacent to the j north property lines of Lots 4 and 6 or in the area which repre- sents generally the first four spaces of the six rows of parking immediately adjacent to the east property line .of Lot 4, all • : 1 • crosshatched and designated as "No HC Employee Parking" on the Site IPlan attached as Exhibit D. :� (c) General. All of the uses permitted within the Common Area shall be used with-reason and judgment so as not to interfere z with the primary purpose of •the Coamon.Area which•is to.provide for .N parking for the customers, invitees and employees of those = businesses conducted within the Exclusive Building Area and for the • •- servicing and supplying of such businesses. Public telephones are . 5 permitted within the Common Area. • . (d) NO Use Fee. Persons using the Common Area in accordance with this Agreement shall not be charged any fee for such use -J1— 02 without the written consent of the Owners unless such fee shall be CD ordered by a governmental authority. If a governmental authority :W ;'^,,, imposes a surcharge or regulatory fee on customer or employee �'` ..JiJ CD04 parking or based on the number of parking spaces within the • " Shopping Center or any other similar fee or charge, then the Owners •: { CI by mutual agreement shall use their best efforts to institute a � , Q uniform fee collection parking system for. the Shopping Center. al 4.5 -Utility and Service Easements. The Owners shall cooperate in the granting of appropriate and proper easements for the installation, repair and replacement of storm drains, sewers, utilities and other proper services in the locations generally as . set forth in the plans attached hereto as Exibit D necessary for I. the orderly development. and operation of the Common Area and -o buildings to be erected upon the Exclusive Building Area. The ,", owners will use their best efforts to cause the installation of c such utility and service lines prior to any paving of the Common _ ,, Area. Any Owner may relocate, at such Owner's sole cost and • '-- ' expense, such utility and service lines so long as there is minimal : interruption in service to any other property in the Shopping Center and there is the same or better utility service to the other I.J property in the Shopping Center after the relocation. • . 4.6 S1gee. Except for directional signs fur guidance upon the ` Common Area, no signs shall be located on the Common Area on the HC t Property or,the Powell Property except signs advertising buoinasees - -7- 1r,1/DC'S:6/17/o2:D xQ 16 W•Agr.nel ' 1 1 • MIIMmma conducted thereon. No signs shall obstruct the access, ingress and egress points shown on the Site Plan, as the same may be changed from time to time only in accordance with the terms of this. 1 Agreement. All signs shall comply with any governmental regula- tions. Any pylon sign on the Shopping Center must be of a quality comparable to pylon signs typically used by national retail tenants. 1 - . One sign may be located on each of Lots 2 and 3 in the i locations designated on the attached Site Plan, as the sign locations may be changed from tims to time by the Owner of the lot upon which such sign is located. The Owner of the HC Property shall be responsible for the cost and muintenance. of any sign on the HC Property. , i ' Lai_ Lots 1, 4 and 6 may each have a sign in the locations ' - -. designated_ on the Site Plan attached as EXhibit T , as the sign • c. - locations may be changed from tine to time -by the Dwner'of the lot !- Z t upon which such sign is located, and thErOvner•of the property upon - - - which the sign is located shall be responsible for the cost and - • 1_• maintenance of such sign. = One sign may be located on Lot 7 in the location designated on �- the attached Site Plan, .which sign shall be constructed by HC. Such sign shall be divided into three equal blocks, one on top of the other. Powell agrees that HC may designate the users for the !W= top two blocks of the -sign (which users must have businesses I�)�J' conducted on Lots 2 or 3) . Powell may designate the user for the � n bottom block of the sign, which user must be a business conducted J`� on Lot 7. • HC shall pay two-thirds of the construction cost and iv 0 maintenance for such sign on Lot 7. Powell shall pay one-third of j the construction cost and maintenance of such sign. A party's ;1 share of the construction cost for the sign shall not be due, and ,• pi ' CD such party's obligation to pay maintenance costs for the sign shall i-,- C') not commence until that party actually urer the allocated apace on '-- LID the sign. • CV CD Except for HC's use of the sign on Lot 7 as described in this Section 4.6, no Owner of any of the lots in the Shopping Center �_ o shall have the right to use any sign on any other lot in the =,I-- Shopping Center, except with the consent of the Owner of such other lot, which consent may be withheld in such Owner's sole discretion. m,n 4.7 Outside Nerchendiainq. Except as provided in this Agreement, the selling, displaying or merchandising of goods shall not be conducted upon the Common Area. Each Owner or Owner's tenants may use the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the Exclusive Building • Area on such Owner's property to the extent allowed by law for the placement of shopping carts and for the display of merchandise being sold from the building on such property and for the sale of i food and nonalcoholic beverages from outdoor vending carts, - . -e- ' • • • • ... . .. . s , .,.... . . . . .7 . . . . . • . ... ... .,...„ provided the pedestrian use of the sidewalk shall not be .;'.-`:• : unreasonably impeded by any such use. • Notwithstanding the ,.•_.,; • foregoing and so long as not prohibited by applicable law, any .;:. i Owner shall have the right to conduct occasional sales or may sell _: ;• Christmas trees within the Common Area located upon such Owner's parcel, provided that such activities shall not be conducted within : fifty (50) feet of the property line of any property owned by any • 1 Owner without the consent of such Owner, which consent may be '-7': withheld in such Owner's sole discretion, and such activities shall ' I not interfere with the ingress and egress and traffic flow/drive '.i,' areas of the Common Area as the same may change from time to time. %', ARTICLE 5 - COMMON AREA DEVELOPMENT 5.1 Develotment Timing. When any building is constructed on a L., parcel, the Common Area on that parcel shall be developed at the . �u _ expense of the_Owner of said parcel. z - - -. .. ARTICLE )O(4 - COON AREA MAINTEXANCE N -- 6.1 Maintenance Standards. Following completion of` the Common )Z Area improvements on an Owner's property, that Owner, at its sole = cost and expense, shall maintain the Common Area on its parcel in • i2' first class condition and repair and in compliance with all E, applicable laws. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, • ,_ N the maintenance shall include the following: 1 DI O • Iu-, (i) Maintaining and repairing the surfaces in a level, smooth .T.o and evenly covered condition with, the type of surfacing • ,, L) CD, material and striping originally installed or such • -,,.' V, substitute therefor as shall in all respects be equal in .''►= LID quality, use and durability; ' I;; (ii) Removing all papers, debris, filth and refuse and washing ' I.,.if. ' a or thoroughly sweeping the area tl the extent reasonably , 1.-: necessary to keep the area in a neat, clean 'and orderly ' condition, and free of snow and ice; 'I. (iii) Placing, keeping in repair and replacing any necessary o appropriate directional signs, markers and lines; I....• §Q (iv) Operating, keeping in repair and replacing when 41 necessary, such artificial lighting facilities as shall m be reasonably required; - .:; (v) Maintaining any perimeter walls in a good condition and • state of repair; and • (vi) Maintaining all landscaped areas and making such replacement of shrubs and other landscaping as is • ;! necessary. • -9- .. . v. • I . 1754/00916/17/02:WM NCW•Ap-.hal • I i i . in 6.2 tlaintenance by Agent. Subject to the revocable mutual agreement of the Owners, a third party may be appointed as an agent of the Owners to maintain the Common Area in the manner as outlined 1 in Section 6.1. Said third party may receive a fee for sucn agency which fee is mutually acceptable to the owners to cover supervision, management, accounting and similar services and which fee is to be allocated among the Owners based on their mutual agreement. ARTICLE 7 - INDE>CIlICATIOW, INSURANCE 7.1 Owner's Indemnification. Each Owner ("Indemnifying Owner") 11 4 hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other Owners and other Owner's tenants from and against all demands, { claims, causes of action or judgments, and all expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in investigating or resisting �.: ! � the -same, for. bodily injury to person, loss of life or damage to 8 - property (i).. occurring_.on the Indemnifying Owners parcel,, except 0 z to the extent caused by the negligence or willfdl�act or omission • 4..+ - in whole or in part of any other Owner or the tenants of such other 1E1- = Ownert or the employees, occurring o °rs or anothergents of Owner's parcel ifrcOa Owner ~ or tenants, or (ii) ,= by the negligence, willful act or omission of the Indemnifying 1111 1~ Owner or the tenants of the Indemnifying Owner or the employees, contractors or agents of such Indemnifying Owner or tenants. To �` (N4 the extent the Indemnifying Owner is liable with another person or i U W G entityfor anydemand, claim, cause of action or judgment, the r. foreging indenity shall only apply to the Indemnifying Owner's N U (j1 (� portion thereof. J (�'1 7.2 Irlaurance. Each Owner shall obtain and maintain comprehensive �.�f= CG general liability insurance during the term of this Agreement. The limits of liability of such insurance shall be not less than Two !;•: '• Cel Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) combined single limit coverage for 1,,, . injury to person, loss of life and damage to property arising out of any single occurrence. The dollar limit set forth above shall .. . be increased on the commencement of the sixth (6th) year after e date of this Agreement and at five (5) year intervals thereafter by '.- • agreement of the Owners who shall mutually agree by using commercially reasonable limits with reference to the limits of =I- insurance !or similar shopping centers in King County, Washington. o= MC may self insure for its obligations under this Section 7.2 c provided that it maintains a net worth of at least $75,000,000 at _., all times during such self-insurance and provides any other Owner with satisfactory evidence of such net worth within ten (10) •- - • calendar dayc of such Owner's written request therefor. Upon request, each Owner shall provide the other owners with a copy of a certificate of insurance evidencing such insurance. All Owners :hall esme each other al duringdany period ofrcds on their respective onstruction) and shall r policies (including Y Pe obtain contractual liability insurance for their Odemnification -10- . 17$4,0OSW17/92I04.61' - - MQM`-,y,.n.t ill i ' jf J n_ i ' • . . • obligations under this Agreement. No policies nay be canceled --:I • • without thirty (30) days notice to the other Owners, subject to any nail i lesser period of time or other agreement by applicable insurance .; I companies. • v ARTICLE 8 REALTY TAXES AND AZSESWLENTs I :- 8.1 Real_ Estate Taxes and Assessments. It is intended that all ' real estate taxes and assessments relating to any portion of the Shopping Center or:improvements thereon, or .the ownership thereof, shall be paid prior to delinquency by the respective Owners • thereof, including Without limitation those taxes and assessments which are laviod'against that part of the Common Area owned by each Owner. 4, In the event any Owner fails at any time to pay before delinquency r -its taxes or assessments on any portion of its parcel or parcels, o and which..may become• a lien on any of the Common Area, then except _ while the validity thereof 'is Laing conteMted by judicial or - v$ . - • administrative proceedings, any other Owner may pay such taxes P. ,. ' and/or assessments together with interest, penalties and cost, and ix 1 in any such event the defaulting Owner obligated to pay such taxes lialg = and/or assessments shall promptly reimburse such other Owner for 1~ all such taxes and/or assessments, interest, penalties, and cost i eq aid other charges and until such reimbursement has been made the ti p amount thereof shall constitute a lien and charge on the defaulting " . - p` Owner's parcel, subject and subordinate, however, to any bona fide 1 "' mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value then l��, O outstanding against said parcel. If allowed by the assessing fps ,,''; cn agency, assessments may be paid in installments for the longest $ ;' period permitted so long as no delinquency .occurs. .• O ial �� larrTet.n 9 - WLIwEmT DOMAIN ' • g :":~ 9.1 goner's Right to'Award. Nothing herein shall be construed to give any Owner any interest in any award or payments made to another Owner in connection with any exercise of eminent domain or • ',,,I transfer in lieu thereof affecting said other Owner's parcel or construed to give the public or any gcvernment any rights in the ;�o Shopping Center. In the event of any exercise of eminent domain or �i • transfer in lieu thereof of any part of the Common Area, the award ® o attributable to the land and improvements ,of such portion of the 1 o Common Area shall be'payable only to the Owner in tee thereof and _'" no claims thereon shall be made by the Owners of any other portion . , of the Common Area. 9.2 Collated Claims. All other. Owners of the Common Area may " file collateral claims with the _condemning authority for their louses which are separate and bpart from the value of the land area and improvements taken from another Owner. . -ll.- 1ni1o',:6/17/97:Wf1A . MC1M•Aar.,w1 - • , I • I sass: . 9.3 Restoration of Common Areas. The Owner of the fee of each portion of the Common Area so condemned shall promptly repair and • restore the remaining portion of the Common Area owned by it as i nearly as practicable to the condition of the same immediately prior to such condemnation or transfer without contribution from any other Owner. • 1 ARTICLE 10 - CANCELLATION, l[ODIYICATION, DURATION I ; Ii 10.1 Cancellation or Modification. This Agreement may be cancelled or modified only by the written agreement of all Owners of the Shopping Center, which cancellation or modification agreement shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the county in which the Shopping Center is located. No Owner shall unreasonably withhold or delay its consent to a proposed modification to this Agreement. Without specifying other reasonable grounds for W _ withholding. consent, an Owner may withhold consent based on - �z - material adverse financial impacts to an Owner's parcel in the Shopping Center as a result of the requested'modification. iv') 11' 10.2 Duration. Unless otherwise cancelled and terminated as +`- permitted herein, this Agreement shall continue for sixty (60) �� years from the date of this Agreement and shall be renewed for an �-. • unlimited number of successive terms of ten (10) years, unless all 1.1 Oers agree otherwise; however, all the easements granted in this • oOwn CD Agreement shall continue in perpetuity. . jJ� V7 ''' ARTICLE 11 - RELEASE YROX LIABILITY IJJ CD CD leasehold title to any portion of the Shopping Center shall be • i_•2� N bound by this Agreement only as to the parcel or portion thereof • acwired by such person or entity. Such person or entity shall be Ci bound by ibis Agreement only during the period such person or k . - - entity is the fee or leasehold owner of si.ch parcel or portion that accrue ortare based ona aevents which as-to oigtions, looccur during responsibilitiesties or said period. Although persons or entitles may be released under this section, the easements, covenants and restrictions in this Agreement shall continue to be benefits and burdens upon the. Shopping Center '3� running with the land. 1 . R n ARTICLE 12 - DLYAULT n ton I 12.1 a.- . In the" event of default or threatened default under this Agreement, only the Owners shall be entitled to institute • proceedings for full and adequate relief from the consequences of said default. - • 12.2 Remedies for Default. If the Owner of any parcel , during the term of this Agreement defaults in the full, faithful and punctual , -12- , . 1714/0054/11/92rtM16 %C -Aar.riiI 1 !1 I y _ - _ :rl . meargar • . performance of any obligation required hereunder and if upon the expiration of thirty (3o) days after written notice from any other ; :4 owner stating with particularity the nature and extent of such default, the defaulting Owner has failed to cure such default, and if a diligent effort is not then being made to cure such default, then any other Owner ("Performing Owner") , in addition to all other remedies it may have at law or in equity, shall have the right to . 1 • perform such obligation of this Agreement on behalf... of such defaulting Owner and to be reimbursed by such, defaulting Owner .• within ten (10) business days of demand therefor for the cost thereof with interest at eighteen percent (18%) per annum on the maximum rate allowed by law. Any such claim for reimbursement, together with interest as aforesaid, shall be a secured right and a lien shall attach and take effect upon recordation of a proper claim of lien by the claimant in the office of the County Recorder �, of the county in which the Shopping Center is located. The claim I_ • • of lien shall include the following: (i) ,the name of the claimant; z • (ii) a statement concerning the basis of the claim'of the lien; (iii) the last known name and address•o! th'e Owner or'a description. of the parcel against which the lien is claimed; (iv) p • ? of the property against which the lien is claimed; (v) a . z description of the work performed or payment made which has given m rise to the claim of lien hereunder and a statement itemizing the amount thereof; and (vi) a statement that the lien is claimed c4 pursuant to the provision•of the Agreement reciting the date, book ';� and page of the recordation hereof. The claim of lien shall be W CD duly verified, acknowledged and contain a certificate that a copy mil :-: thereof has been served upon the Owner against whoa the lien is I�L ' c2 O claimed, either by personal service or by mailing to the defaulting .1 co Owner as provided in Article 13. The lien so claimed shall attach CO from the date of recordation solely in the amount claimed thereby f ,- O and it may be enforced by suit, or under power of sale (which power l 17. N is hereby granted) , judicial foreclosure or in any other manner • al allowed, by law for the foreclosure of liens. A Performing Owner is hereby granted the right to enter upon the parcel of the defaulting ` - owner for the limited purpose of curing a default as provided under • this Agreement. Any exercise of the power of sale or foreclosure - shall be conducted in accordance with the laws of he, S te of o or •. - • Washington applicable to the exercise of p'r+ ers o foreclosures of mortgages and deeds of trust. If appropriate, a •- Performing Owner is hereby appointed the trustee for purposes of W exercising sich .powur of sale, with Tull right of substitution. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such liens shall be subordinate to x any mortgage or deed of trust given in good faith and for value now or hereafter encumbering the property subjected to the lien, which mortgage or deed of trust was recorded prior to the recording of �:; the lien, and any purchaser at any foreclosure or trustee's sale (as well as any grantee by deed in lieu of foreclosure or trustee's sale) under any first mortgage or deed of trust shall take free and clear from any such then existing lien, but otherwise subject to 1 . y -11- 1ri OS G/Oib/11/o2i0J51A MCW-A*n rr l MAMOCM ` the provisions of this Agreement. The failureof t to e Owner or in c \ Owners of any of the parcels subject to this Agreement of any insist then any one or more cases upon the strict performance 1 promises, covenants, conditions, restrictions or agreements herein, shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment for the future breach of the provision, hereof. - 12.3 Attorneys' Fees. In the event that suit is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement or as a result of any alleged default hereunder, the prevailing party or parties to such suit shall be entitled to be paid reasonable attorneys' fees oand costs by n appsal and he non-prevailing party or parties, including judgment or decree rendered shall include an award therefor. • 12.4 Governina Law. This Agreement shall be governed and enforced W by, and construed in accordance with the lawn of the State of - - Washington. - _ - . • - _ ARTICLE 13 - POZICEE . pursuant hereto may be ►--- 13.1 oticen. Notices made by the Owners = served personally or via overnight courier or mayst a®e wed prepaid, 3 depositing the name in the United States mail, spo as follows: mail, return-receipt requested, vi I If to Powell: Powell-Orillia Associates W 737 Market Street O Kirkland, WA 98033 n '� Attn: Peter U. Powell vi- " CD Robert C. MacAulay {_„` CO With a copy to: Alston, Courtnage, MacAulay i Proctor .. O� 1000 Second Ave., Ste. 3900 CAI Seattle, WA 98104 i- ... If to HC: c/o Waban Inc. �- -•. 140 Ora�.gefair Mall, Suite 100 • ' Fullerton, CA 92632 i1_•., Attni Vice Preaident, Real Estate S o With a copy to: c/o WabanM Inc. g Natick, MA 01760 =., Attn: Executive Vice rresidvnt, Finance y Notice shall be deemed given when served personally upon or delivered by overnight courier to a dpe s after s uitable depositedage and discretion, or if mailed, three (3) Y «=. U.S. mail. c 1 ` -14-• KW-Apr.no1 I TWQOS:6/17/12 0016 • 1 1 ,•ti�'t.'t•: .-`•� •"•. -•'', ._: .i.f�' aLf' .rti.�'? •3:' ''.t:-:r: '.fi r :,. _`.s,.,..y 91a:.+-r'•:►.0_, .'••Y• f • • The foregoing addresses may be changed by written notice given pursuant to the provisions of this Section: il ' , ARTICLE 14 - LinDER PROTECTION 14.1 Lender Protection. This Agreement and the rights, privileges, covenants, agreements and easements hereunder with respect to each Owner and all parcels, shall be superior and senior to any lien placed upon any parcel, including the lien of any mortgage or deed • of trust. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no braach hereof shall • defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value, but all of the covenants and restrictions, easements and conditions and other provisions, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and effective against any person or entity iligi - (including any mortgagee or beneficiary under a deed of trust) who i � acquires title to any parcel or any portion thereof by foreclosure, _ - o trustee's sale,,.deed in lieu of foreclosure of otherwise. _ jARTICLE 15 - MISSAL PROVISIONS,� (U 15.1 No Covenant to Overate. Not!-ing either expressed or implied, contained in this Agreement shall obligate any Owner or any Owner'stenants to continuously operate any type of business on its parcel.15.2 Bunning of Benefits and Servitud8. Rights of Sucessors. The"~ CO easements, restrictions, benefits, and obligations hereunder shall Iv,y'• r. create mutual benefits and burdens upon all the parcels of the - i" Cs/ Shopping Center running with the land. This Agreement shall bind ., O and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their respective j-- �•.i VI heirs, personal representatives, tenants, successors, and/or I.•n CD assigns. The singular number includes the plural and any gender CD includes all other genders. n::' 15.3 Hot a Public Dedication. Nothing Heri en contained of the Commonhall be be III to be a gift or dedication of any portion to the general public or for the general public or for any public purposes whatsoever, it being the intention of the parties hereto • that this Agreement shall be strictly limited to and for the purposes herein expressed. The right of the public or any person e- o to make any use whatsoever of the Common Area or the parcels herein 111 L. L.: affected, or any portion thereof (other than any use expressly m allowed by . a written or recorded map, agreement, deed or i., dedication) is by permission, and subject to the control of the Owners.. Notwithstanding any other provisions herein to the 1 — - contrary, the Owners by mutual agreement may periodically restrict t ingress and egress from the Common Area in order to prevent a AM W prescriptive easement from arising by reason of continued public • use. Any restriction on ingr.us and egrsss shall be limited to the minimum period necessary to prevent the creation of a prescriptive I17�/0O I6/Il/o7.OVS16 K1Y-►4r.rM1 1 i _ - - , -. 'tiL, v , _1 1 - .. easement and shall occur at such a time as to have a minimum effect on the operation of the Shopping Center. • 15.4 Document Execution and Chanae. It is understood and agreed I that, until this document is fully executed and delivered by the authorized corporate officers of the parties hereto, there is not and shall not be an agreement of any kind between the parties hereto upon which any commitment, undertaking or obligation can be • I founded. It is further agreed that, once this document is fully . executed and delivered, it contains -he entire agreement between the parties hereto and that, in execatina it, the parties do not ( ' rely upon any statement, promise or representation not herein, expressed and, except as permitted by Section 10.1 of this 1 Agreement, this document, once executed and delivered, shall not be . ( modified, changed or altered in any respect except by a written document executed and delivered in the same manner as required for 1.., this document. I' . . . _ _ _ _ - 15.5 No*Joint ,Venture. It- is not intended• by this Agreement to,. and nothing contained in this Agreement shall, create any partnership, joint venture or other joint or equity type agreement between the Owners. 15.6 Reasonableness of Consent. Unless otherwise provided herein, I'' whenever. an Owner's agreement or approval is required under this IIIfc Agreement, such Owner shall not unreasonably withhold or delay such II '_.1,-: agreement or approval. f 7 S O ," • 15.7 yet 1. Powell intends to develop Lots 1 and' 7 in the future, — f✓I i�J CQ although there are no current plans for such development. Other ,,,,f� C than the terms of this Agreement, no Owner may place any 11 I-".' r, restrictions on the development of Lot 7. Powell agrees to not ' J !'- Ca,:', ,,. commence the processing of any governmental entitlements for" CD construction on Lot 1 until the earlier of (a) that date upon which i'' HC has commenced construction of improvements on Lots 2 and 3; or :"; - CI (b) that date which is two (2) years from the date of this -' Agreement. Prior to any development of Lot 1, Powell will he required to obtain applicable governmental approvals. Powell's development of Lot 1 shall be subject to site plan approval, by the ' Owner of Lot 2, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld or j m delayed. In connection with any development on Lot 1, Powell agrees to not disrupt the traffic flow on Lot 2, not diminish any lito utility services provided to Lot 2 and not provide any off-site amenities to obtain approval for development vn Lot 1. HC agreep i __ '^ that in connection with any development on Lot 1, Powell may make curb cuts directly opposite and to match the curb cuts on Lot 2 •- __ which are directly opposite the south border of Lot 1, as ,.; designated on the attached Site Plan and as the, same may change from time to time, all such work at Powell's sole cost and expense. r 15.8 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in any number of tounterparts, all of which together shall constitute one document. -16- ' lil1- manes t6/17•/fl1D'd 6 •AQr.rr1 mink . ;-'= . ••. a•:f"' :.;•.....:r':•.,':fi__' . _. !!! Only the original counterpart signature and notary pages need be recorded with one copy of this Agreement. ♦ 15.9 po Consents. Except as provided in this Agreement, development on any property covered by this Agreement is not . subject to any consent from or to HC or Powell. All lot development ent will be subject to satisfaction of applicable coverage, density, parking and other zoning and land use requirements of any governmental authority with jurisdiction. t - 15.10 ylet.e.nds. As part of the governmental approval for develop- 1 ment of the HC Property, the Owner of Lot 7 must provide and agrees to provide to the City of Renton one or more easements for wetlands preservation of approximately 65 feet in width, or such greater area as required by the City of Renton for the development of the HC Property as such development is currently approved by the City ,,,1 of Renton. Powell understands that the legal description for the � � wet.'.ands preservation easement is as currently set forth in ~ • attached •Exhibit F. Such easement will be recorded separately. _ _ All costs associated with the maintenance of the wetlands ..: "' `ipreservation area on Lot 7, except real property taxes, shall be Paid by Lots -2 and 3. The wetlands easement area shall, be f 1,� maintained to a standard designated by HC. {! 15.11 Lot 7. Powell, as Owner of Lot 7, hereby conveys and �w C) quitclaims to the other Owners in the Shopping Center for the benefit of the Shopping Center a perpetual, non-exclusive easement 1Z-.1)W- for ingress and egress, and access over and across that portion of V J p Lot 7 legally described in attached p,EJiibit E ("Driveway Easement I'L; O. Property") . The costs to maintain the Driveway Easement Property Iv,'•' CC shall be shared prorata by all the property in the Shopping Center, I-"i provided that no lot is obligated to contribute to maintenance 1s. costs for the Driveway Easement Area until construction commences . . �; on such lot, and then only for such lot's prorate share of mainte- nance costs thereafter. The prorata share shall be the percentage ' - which the square footage of a lot upon which construction has J commenced bears to the total square footage of all lots ill the • Shopping Center upon which construction has commenced,- except • Lot 7, which square footage shall be deemed to be 30,000, and '— Lot 1, for which the lot square footage.shall be determined based on the buildable area of the lot, excluding property dedicated to • wetlands preservation and similar to the method used by Powell to o determine the buildable area, for Lot 7. The following square W footages for lot size shall be used for purposes of thin Section ' 1- - 15.10: Lot Square id?S Footage Lot 2 445,311 '. Lot 3 586,312 ' . - Lot 4 35,000 - Lot 6 35,000 • Lot 7 30,000 -17- MINA•A�r.�1 ,�115�/04S, ,17/V71DVf1A ..... 1 • 1 .. tip, :w%.'Fa►J' . i.;A ifti fist >If. : .•: _ . . .._ tip'".. -2.5.. . 1 ' -- • MOM _ .> .46 •.':'' '�•'F'= .r7 ��w car •r r1'• Y ^ _ e+�1- a,� fTo .. c•+'• �'•if:•• i'• • ' BC shall maintain the Dri'sway Easement Area to a standard as . ‘ designated by BC in its reasonable discretion. If an Owner obligated to pay a prorate share of such maintenance costs fails to do so within ton (10) business days of written demand therefor z accompanied by substantiating invoices, then interest on the unpaid _ amount shall bear interest at eighteen percent (18%) per annum until paid and the other Owners shall have the rights and remedies provided in Section 12 of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement. • j i POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, a HCWA REALTY CORP., a Washington i ' Washi,�j• on sne .1 pa .ership corporation 1.•Al..,l. •t....f� By .• W�. o . . Powell Nso l G: Partner Its z i ~ By `/ A . .�. By I-- Peter W. Powell.t Its General Partner 5 EIEIBIT8 ,La • tj A - Legal Description of HC Property J~ 0 B - Site Plan C 7 W ,,, C - Legal Description of Powell Property ... D - Utility. Plan J`� E - Driveway Easement Area V„.,,, '. F - Wetlands Preservation Easement Area w'— O 'x ,L N r Q) J r 1.I r • • W • S n lJ • J C , 1 • 1 . -18- I Twoos lu»m mows u . . one•Mr....t • i. ; I. ..•.• •'!T..' . , •' �•'�:'-�,,,:�,:,�+Ty,i'Mom••• ,:H.r a.y1'i.. `:: A. ,.y. _ . Nr , I '�: ►_-___ - , no • • .1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) sa. COUNTY OF r-Lg1 J ) I! On this A71i day of 6 - , 1992, before me, a Notary c.- Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and • $ sworn, personally appeared Lloyd W. Powell and Peter W. Powell, to me known to be the general partners of POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, .- the partnership named in and which executed the foregoing instrument; and they acknowledged to me that they signed the came - as the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the , persona appearing before se and making this acknowledgment are the • • - . .persons whose true signatures appear on this document. WITNESS my hand and official seal the day and-year in this - (certificate above written. ,`SSSS.��uq,i�, NOTARY PUBLIC in and for e S e of \, iO.YY1� ,,, Washington, residing at J . .°�• T •'�.� My commission expires: Aft-4 • r- : fie' ps N,• L ,s W 7 - I • O ,Z.) w, J J 1 \,[ •. .Phi' .. • a .'.4.CFWP� ,<. L ^ ,'Intel:llt.\\ ., V n W •-J 0, •^ a, '1 • 7.- I.J m =7 . m W W •.J 7j/jtf . -19- 1 r 4.NOS,11/1 r/12,®VS 14 NOM-Mir.rv1 - t t ,_I..- 1 • } 41.0.110 • STATE OF WAN ) ) ss. COUNTY OF OYm 0c ) • On this 23'� day of Jun-e , 1992, before as, a Notary • Public in and for tb+ State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Jahn F. ►..�evy and , to me, known to be the Prrs i d ram+- and [ -respect-4w4y, of HCWA REALTY CORP., the corporation named in and , • which oxezuted the foregoing instrument; and they ac)nlovledged to me that they signed the same as.the free and voluntary act and dead r i of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. 1 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the • • persons appearing before me and making this acknowledgment are the v • • persons whose true signatures appear on this document. z WITNESS my—hand and ..official seal the day and year in this a„ certificate above written �.� �d _ . z NOT PUBLIC in and for the State of '744-Iles-A-P•4-[,.J •Waekine ten, residing at 'h•/-2s,:h*-• .0'+. ce ` My commission expires: 9—i0-r:S' W • J U W V, MIA HANSEN `� N , i, "••c i Nary Pok—caseni. 1 , .-.[.[ 0 , fir.-A� MANN COUNTY , L wc_MIaww IBw.IIOS • ., 0 •.- N ! . s O ` W O W w y _20- ` 1 1714/00S[4/11/I?IOUS14 IK1M•Ar.no 1 • 1 1 • 'TICE: THE DOCUP : • T. IS F '.KE IS L=SS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE ' • .i ..i DUE TO 'i: _ ".:1-LiTY C.,?' TFE COCUM HT. I . • • • 92065302702 . , 4/ tol 1 i i . LI, g 0, i.' • 6; h. ro N g VI D. ; F. i r;y t' T:J yyl I )...4 1 • . ';',.:,;: :- THE DOC •. - : T 1.,I; ..-.!.1 .: IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NCTICE • I , ,.. _I- MJE TO . •i ; '..:7? ,;•' T,..:_ LNENT. J . , . • ... • 1 - I .. . . ,, .... ___.......,....._ ___ • ... - . _ • _. _ ... _ _ • . , . •••••• •• •• . . . . . . . . . 920.6302702 ... . ... ......_ __-) k,_ , , . r-: - ---.----- -t6 -- - - -- LICO • . . .. • ; . vo • •, -.7- •- -- - - --- - . r --::. . e • a i . • ,. . t i 101:111111i111 • -.411 Wiii11111111 2 li:riiii i• 1 ---oi , 1 • , : u ....4 ,•-• t 111114.iiii, . . 1=-4 - 411111, IIIIIIII *3 IIIIII'lk I\ . - ' ..,-• I I I I . .31.rri i. 1 I 1 i 1 1,111 I 1 p I 1 .• ...• 11 Ili. Y: ! . .• i , - • , LS) ! 1 1• 13-111. ,. li/ • -r- .1PU-711! Ao. 111;-"J"ItIl It' : Cl\\\\ \:\s\.\Nss..............N............ • I • . . . . 1 E. i i .z II.• : ! • •• st Z . • I • . • ! 1 1 . ; , , . i i • .. , .• 1 , I S. LP' 1 • 1 . i 6 i e) 1 ' . ! . . I , - . I •1Iit• -.....:.. . i I ' i 1 ) I ! • (../) I : 1 1 I ! I 7 - 1. .1. .- • - . .. I 11 1. • . - 614Str."'''/ ... ! •••••• in : 1 • • P .• I i I j . P- l• I ! . ••••• . 11 k.••.gift. g it 1: I 1 gl •--...- minsicom fassualri ,....:.z...... . .....-. ............... --. : '= --••L I i . k , .2-7- ;F- . fru.' 15 (I) I -—1 - , . § I 1 MINK 4• I • ;Hid 1.11716112=1 .""lior " '1 / • Id • ___, . . . i - I' P k ,. 1 - il e...1 ' • 1 M % t 274 C IS ,• I , ,(....4. • . alk 40 i '. . .kV ... i...\ . ' -12='• .--I i s-t- I 1 . Mel ..,-.-. . , '. . I k . Wr• • . . • . —1 . . i -1- I !7i-2•• Ei 1 1....... ,, . G1 • • . mi ., p • —......„.. .-••• -----171—Th .__. I . I N1111 .: lir t ). 1 I 1 1 L .11 1 I 1 I . 1 a I E I • . . ;, i• . • i , 4 • i AZ 4W 41=11•1•1 .. . . .1111:=11.r A...../bi IMIS 21=011111101.a 0 I . ' •1KONMOOMBEINIMIEBSISIBIll . II • ' . - =x.... .a.--,:r...-- .. .tr.... .... ,, 1 • • . ) -_-.i,.. _ r. , iii , • . . . - -6 11 1 i -- •' f • . .:-. E. ,1 ! • . , . _. ., • . •!.22 I 1 frim .,.; a 4; : .4:3 ::. :;;.• •ii ..i.. I .1 41 pl :i: :it 11r. Eli. i-I i 1.k.540 • - - . Illi I . I = - = a _ 1 --,- :.. :-, b:., :••• .• Ni iii iii .i'L :1 1.1 7 1- e. ._ . .z . .. ;: _ ,„:„:,........„...„....„,.. , , , , . : . , :: , .., 7•T AL T 1 - 11 - - - -- -- imt: 1 --I- -- -- _i_ ri . • _ E I w : ' E. 1 E.:. 3:111 '11.1:' ' L ..„.huvrti ___-, . f_.,/,/ . i ,.. ...:,..„:• t•PILO ......"7-.... .. 11 remr turv-try_, ..__. i' .it r• illiol . ..141 At'7441/11/: 4 . .. !V ' • - _...../ i - .-1,- ............,- . .- -,-. ..____.. ...- ..-, .. . . . .. • - i , -- i -- _ . / ____ I r___ .4L-- i r ) ( 1 I r."--.) — . - — . . . . . .--• . . ........ .. . . . „ 1- • 4 f "1- % / AI I r \./ I III I%A I A \/ ----.----........... aismiclacciviensurdiusummi•itrovamml SA110111111MINSIMINISiri .......... .. — _.. . ....._ . • . . . _ • i • • . Ili • . ' • •. - • S-.W.3 4 T H S - . _�- -- . TWEET : I - - --.-'.�{ ------ -T-- - �.� li � . I ) .. ete° . I i 11111/1--- . � -7� i . �:�L-.- _r ! r • r:c- '4 IN : wirmmm ... , i , I S.W.M.unem) . . !'�.i O _ = — �tl"RU WPM: iant!! t� It�M i .. • i I int,.nrCs fiii 0 + .. i Y . 4, ►uwwo' iwM+wl� j .• .. O I .rr uml r ._r .., 1Iil � �111111 II f1 [ I lU1La,wl�Ut T �La 'SITE PLAN I Cr; I t•g0'-o" ! A� IRIA A." _r�l.illltl. • • I I I • . � ' Io _ 4/1 . I - _ • _ - ate • ; III I I ' • - • � I �1IIII ti .H „2.. ......... ! • . . L.-. Imo► • or... 1 . .. ! ! • ' 1 i±: � . i j,,, rim. -_ ( �mm�u7;alnum �TRlir• ; ,- ; : 1' itk \ . ......... al arkeittyliviia •�r {II fl i . .- r, , glul . I _ _: -' 1114141. i. ;WI IIliiTIfi�p,• I i I •r . '�. IP I /A �Am, ' it a •6.0 •liL.• -... "\ c • S.W. 41S T S1 �E,ET SITE PLA 1 • • 3.1 h,' vr' �� I hatV �•3 b . - • .. rT - • - .. l - • -- - ;nE _,•,! . - : : ... : iS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE -- ._r.. — 9206302 i02• , • 1 • ,; 1 o _N ������ ,i���; ' Iff�iSi;l Q— • , I , I iiil tii . 11111 11� , 1 b ' u ' '1l�1'''i11' ► 11i����',Is, ' i1 �'1111 j ! ` - ttIhi �� .IIIIl••'-{^!tt1 IO> i�Ip '':\\kki.s.4..,„..„ ! ;sU.'itu1 ill: e Z ., , . (.,-) , q z 1 .1 .. . • . . .. ..„.:... , .. i ..z.:._ , r I • r -, f----::tion......r... 1 _______.-----. --I ... 11,......,111.11,1161.......- - _Alait.., 1 I • U) .'call ! , 11 '1 i r r \ , ... s .. . ....i 3 11‘ , \ . 314 g . ''''''''''-----7--- _.-_-_-,(i.j. t1 • - =(" - I 'TO ; � 1 , is ' x - ~ Pi I I� . ; lig r7 j ' t t'iF —II - sgz 1� _ —t` , ? 'I... 1!1[ 11 1 M 111 i . I n IoI l • j • "01`. ga A. a E :1!! III & 1:iwt---��' _ _ t. i A-. , . g- I ll, I -fr. 2 :ij I �'i: �::I •i: 'i' ill 1 : I :: I I . - .....,..,::, E . e ilt I 1 p> I1 j �illi "' iii ' I . ditir, : -- is _ - _ "1 lid. d.. - i�'. :?•� I•. =Z I j II-. ��r �r 'IA •;z�..1 _ . �II �1{�' 1 ri,.. . i - * t 7. % ~, - -�• . . . .:...1,-�- -- --1 --� . r- . -1-- 1 I A I 1 r N./r I II/sI I1 A/ A \./ 1 y-. ,' • . • -- --' — •i;•fir: :,E �.��!•:• - : T : '1.E ! L_SS CLEAR THAN THIS.NOTICE I It r .i U iY T. _ CG:L.:i T. - _ .. • k .j , i _wry, • . 9206302702 : ....... a Os if i :ri }: • aEg . in 1 Of HI •••....PI a j; •:...::::;a.:::•':;;;I:v.,!4....if.:•.,F14'.1:.:T::.:::;:;,:,::........ .. i! 1i.kti .l 1.: �:. • . 1 i 8 ' • • . 1 �, a• I • ' • - • . . .„ C S.W .3.4IH STRUT .1 MI 1 ...,----__Iinill • i . I ham- I • I V . ) crl 1fJill I I ' ii V . 7 \I , 1 . , , -x8w , 6±4 ( •• I - , I I i i , a I i I . NOT A PART fror..,..... .......... .ill if I i i 6 - • al V i 4 I ..dir .41.1g•••• f• .g. .j. N A ...J 2 inimmainw., mow.... ...... .....77.--:.:-----=.........- - -- ....................:- ,. . . w• W • .- -.•• 1 ..., a a wpm e;'0167..Vii111110i=ltilf _MIAINIIMIN 1 li I 0 . - 4 Fl ic; .. .1 i, • t717 1 I Br.r......••••••••• airtv. Hi . ...juaw ii I I I :ta kr " llrl 1 IELS0011.• .11.04N 11,1 • ! • ill [......,,,,, wmirmw 0 . ..„ , .., /, .k. . 1114 /Are A.... RI .4 ...All!, .. 1. IIIKAW&gar :.;1. filln7m.P411M: ri I I( WZ.4.P X......... ir.m....Ilii,....._ .1 I 1 immtuaawr 1 A. fil I , •... 19'PM L.- • .= tx 2 1, VIITITithuk01. II. .".40. 1111 .1119;. iN ,I :7., 7 INIL.4111EVOIli`MIN I A1121=all ) LI ijIll— ler 7 . Ai , • \PRELIMINARY GRADING & UTILITY\PLA- N'"--f --. Pillet 4" I qq . Y , _ A _........ ....• • Z01.20C90Z6 - . - ...• • • 1 '111..n:T.- -i 'l ;!:', -. 1 oi 3110 5.- ... • -I, • r I"SI C.f.,I 11164111 S.Mrl'I'N re..., '7 1.i ': e, , V - . • allnn lwi J! :1-.11 ...--. , • • • . • • . , . • • • -... . .-_. - . -.4 . ; i 1 I I . P . J._ . ..--.-._ •i- . . ! t 1N7. . .• . • . . . .. 0 • ! . • • . ; . . . . •'i : . . N \ t I I 0 7 : i . Cl M r gui, . 1 1 . &fin-- 6. --=.,--- --- --- __ .. .• • . . . %am, knmit,c TIL IK7 ,—. '''.....-* 1 Ak• . ..._ _ C7) . - I irl • ' . '... '3. •.. , -< >, . . kik j Jr• f . ,. • . i t til I 01 - li . 0 . . , • „: > e .1 ii -'1 • , .c. CD 1 . 1 . . , ; (_. ...... . i I r) ! ' Wilif .i — I • . .4 p T / •••••••I IV* I '•;° h.r-1 •. . ., —. maw•. ..! . 1 --1 \ ;' mi 1 , 1 t n i „me.; . •IhIl. ;. .... -911 "..../.•‘ •••:•1. i< \ Ismmi. vt 't , --‹ I -0 •.. . migo "N.t‘ -Ase•• • n .:-•.(11.:Ph.L, WO. . 'UM/ V ,.... I. ;''':•.:11 . .7 r- ir . Iiii.......i.7.1.—,„ . > ' - ' ' 1 I .: . Asi 4:i - = ia _• I. ... .... •:r. .tr -.F 'v. --i.7: ...- : 1 '• I e I i i 1 i I E: li .`-. . i • L NIP"it%I I P:Il ...... .." :. •16. 71 :: 7 '.*-' ..i i . V-- ......11r--firr .v ! , , (4._„:,.„.% 'ij 1MIN• : . 4:6 .r. ilk ., bdilltheilkh.A. .. dike be 110,4i404-41, PI . . . oulim -i-u-_-_-.6, ----........ ..--.-...---;ii.r.1 ......-.7=- ...-ii.i..- - - ----2 • ,;.,:I - . ni,.—-.——. —.--.=_.. —.— . ----:-.W.B..? al•._.. . II .... — .—•-• .--..I.--.- . J--r i I I \ 5 I • • : . EAS1 VALLEY HCAIA AY WI it!I . • , --- . . . I -.1' T,51c1^ 1 TURNER & ASSOCOATES PACE MERIBERSH:IP WAREHOUSE Jr• .'"di it I ao nrrri f 1..8 w.....orn. . , , goo ir D. 1 . . • • i • _ _ • • BU;H. ROED c} HITCHINGS. INC. • EXHIBIT-E • ACCESS' EASEMENT DESCRIPTION. THAT PORTION OF LOT 7 OF DUPLINGTON NORTHERN, ACCORDING TO THE • BINDING SITE PLAN THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME /C/ _ OF BINDING SITE PLANS;• PAGES c THROUGH ,, , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, • ) WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 30.00 FEET IN WIDTH, • HAVING 15.00 FEET OF SUCH 'WIDTH ON ZACH SIDE OF AN EASEMENT CEN • - TERLINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: S COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT '; THENCE NORTH O1°50.'09" EAST 18.00 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF TO .THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID EASEMENT CENTERLINE AND THE BEGINNING • OF ANON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS ' OF 120.00 FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID BEGINNING BEARS SOUTH , 00°54'35" WEST) ; THENCE ALONG. SAID CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING THREE • o , - - COURSES: - - - - . - . - • . i - I ,,, THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY 109.33 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE _ ' THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°12'09"; THENCE NORTH 36'53'17" WEST '- 173.08 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST t • HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY • = 83.40 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39'49'13" = TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7 AND THE TERMINUS OF SAID Q EASEMENT CENTERLINE, AND FROM SAID TERMINUS SAID r.INT OF BEGIN- • i NING BEARS SOUTH 49°02'54" EAST, 352:66 FEET DISTANT. I . W ',",( TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 7 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . J iJ "• BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF THE I I. W ' STRIP DESCRIBED ABOVE AND SAIn WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 7, SAID POINT . = • OF BEGINNING BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST p • HAVING A RADIUS OF 2043.79 FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID r„) N. BEGINNING BEARS SOUTH 83°06'18" EAST) ; THENCE NORTHERLY 25.85 - J 0 FEET 'ALONG SAID CURVE AND WESTERLY LINE AS SHOWN ON SURVEY '- •, I. RECORDED IN VOLUME 80 OF SURVEYS PAGE 156, RECORDS OF SAID KING I • N. COUNTY, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°43 '29"; THENCE SOUTH 1 0 82°49 '47" EAST 8.80 FEET ALONG A LINE RADIAL TO THE PRECEDING 1 • VO CURVE .TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE O 0 NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET .(A RADIAL LINE THROUGH _'-- CDu SAID BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 82°50'29" WEST) ; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND • 0 0 O) SOUTHEASTERLY 43.16 FEET ALONG SAID CURC11VE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE i•-, OF 70°39'02" TO SAID NORTHERLY MARGIN OF THE STRIP DESCRIBED ABOVE AND A POINT OF CUSP WITH A CURVE CONCAVE. TO THE SOUTH • L. _ _ HAv1NG A RADIUS OF 135.00 .FEET (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT OF CUSP BEARS NORTH 26°30'29" EAST) ; THENCE WESTERLY 12.76 FEET W ALONG SAID CURVE AND NORTHERLY MARGIN THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF u . - 13°54 '21" TO THE' POINT OF BEGINNING; ' 1/2 i 1 • _ .. _ _ • . BUSH, ROED& HITCHINGS, .Ih 1 • ALSO TOGETHER WITH THAT •PORTION OF SAID LOT 7 DESCRIBED AS FOL- . LOWS: . BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF THE STRIP DESCRIBED ABOVE AND SAID WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 7, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH- WEST-HAVING A RADIUS OF. 105.00 FEET .(A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID . BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 14°07'06" EAST) ; THENCE EASTERLY AND SOUTH- EASTERLY 71.46 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN ' THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 38°59 '37" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY ON SAID SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN AND A POINT OF CUSP WITH A CURVE CON- CAVE TO- THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.19 FEET . (A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT OF CUSP BEARS NORTH 53°06'43" EAST) ; • THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, WESTERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY 80.63 • . . • . FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 131°16'32" TO • T11E EASTERLY PROLONGATION OF A RADIAL'LINE TO SAID WESTERLY. LINE. . ' OF LOT 7 WHICH BEARS SOUTH 80°46154" EAST; THENCE NORTH-80646'54" WEST -2.60 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 7 AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2043.79 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 52.70 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE AND ' WESTERLY LINE 0 F LOT 7 AS SHOWN ON SURVEY RECORDED IN VOLUME 80 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 156, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLF OF O1°28'39" TO THE ' POINT OF BEGINNING. • ,;, 0 THE SIDELINES OF THIS EASEMENT SHALL BE SO SHORTENED- OR LENGTH- EKED SO AS TO TERMINATE IN SAID EAST LINE AND SAID•WESTERLY LINE . � OF LOT 7.- :-,. p ' ' C SITUATE IN:THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON • I• CD THE PARCEL. DESCP.IBE BC 'E C TTNe12, 372 SQUARE FEET (O -)0ACRES), MORE OR LESS. POWELL DEVELOPMENT BURLINGTON NORTHERN BSP 1ICKOX, P.L.S. �oo�p 4L�Cp BRHLJOB NO.IkM A. H91407.08/SUR54B 1. �" o • JUNE 23, 1992 't:• REVISED JUNE 26, 1992 i . . 1 • 4*T. •.:. 'i b Zb-9z 'a'+4L1„rm . ' i • 2/2 • i !y ' .\�) • maim - BUSH. ROED& HITCHINGS, INC. e EXHIBIT F I • . r. • • SOUTH WETLAND DESCRIPTION • THAT PORTION OF LOT 7 OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN, ACCORDING TO THE ' BINDING SITE PLAN TfiREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME /4/ OF BINDING SITE PLANS, PAGES - // , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: iz BEGINNING AT THE CORNER COMMON TO SAID LOT 7 AND LOTS 2 AND 3 OF f SAID BINDING SITE PLAN; THENCE NORTH 88.09 '51" WEST 75.00 FEET; • - THENCE SOUTH 01.50'09 ' WEST 383.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 55.26'54" EAST 3.99 FEET TO SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 7; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST 1 LINE THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES: w THENCE NORTH 28.33 '51" EAST 159.29; THENCE NORTH O1.50'09" EAST � , 2,43.51 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. . - - . - . • o Z SITUATE IN THE' CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY; WASHINGTON. - . 'n - ' �'• - �_. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 23,833 SQUT.RE FEET (0.55 ▪ • ACRES) , MORE OR LESS. ~ POWELL DEI. LOPMENT • g • BURLINGTON "ORTHERN BSP WILLIAM A. HICKOX, P.L.S. N< C �I A H JUNE 2, 1992 (01=J J ;. t �`•1�• c•WA3 O+ • 91407.08/SUR54B • u. C) : A:r rlichc* 5 • ,,-)i•-• C.) 1. ''4%.;;ILIkiiltio ! . m . - • • .� O 1-- �) , O W x ,n w • L _ C-- f ' • • • • _ - . . w.1'iu.iP +riai�b`au:�►3..;....._..�� Q 1 - , 0• • amines: • 1 1 • , I • , , ,..‘ 1 h 1 1-4141 ... t •.,1 -:. tui.....gal 40 Rol/rood Ricyyt a hby i., •..t.J. •• i• . r•.' : 1 Vi.1.....1 . . J r••i .•1 t .....• . r..••••• .• 1• ••• I , IN'. ..• • :••• i 1 t. . 1 ....I. • •• :;•.Z.: . t '‘ •• I :1.1• :%.•.-t.:•. % l't '•.' ........, . . f 1 7/ ..-: • . •.,..6:-..- .1. t•0 ,-,..,...-.• - ...,.....r.s.:. •.. 1 . '..) --.. ,.. ; ..,- ; ... , • ' ,::, , .: . .,-,..-. , -.. •• . f? 0/3. No Scale 1 .•!:::4./.. i . I, :•••1 • A,ele•oswi•tr• ..1.•.. . • .. -....... . 1 ; . C4 •••.: .• •• • :.•••.; • :• 0 :',.:.,;•_".:. ,.. , , IN. CV I i, ( .:; : ;-.4 . IP ' ' •-•,7"- .:-.t •• ...; . ..f... f...•: ,_; ... -.... II - •_ ,T, -C,t .. . - I .• . co .1-• -1- • - . .. . LC ........... , - ' 4•,) d t4 • • . -•:: .4 . cv . • - ,s . •• 7 cr) k . .. • i -C • II 1 •.••1•• I I:: 1 ‘ -• a 2 • . . ...• I x I . i$ cp.4'). . -.. c n - *. -7-*• I 5 . . Q I S 55•26:54'e---,..\\... 4 , • ,1 1 . ..., p up I'2,`,2 ,1,1 I1.a..!I— . 1.'• 4f,0• I s (fL1 3 99' • :i....••.\.•;* 1 1 • .- .. : 1 1 SOUTH WETLAND' SKETCH i i • • ._ . m I— POWELL DEVELOPMENT §LJ . rz, • • BLRLINGTON NORTHERN BINDR4G SITE PLAN , I . '" ,,. ..e.i..„4_,.... ...„,.,.. ._, . Ill , I. ••‘' 'CO wAsii;4. •qi- ? , k ...r,/,‘,,, . 0,. ! bbill'Ciii., la i 1 Z • W .4_, cp..— --v, • , .2 ; • ‘.., if,''. cre.P°R-1,.. % • PlIEPARED IT: if 1 co r . •?. ,• • '...: t .-- -• BUSH,ROED&HITCHINGS INC. . . / i. 4,•/2.17. ,,..., , iIII I I .14/ Z SO SEAL t, - CIVIL ENGINEERS&LANG SURVEYORS a • • f 1 \.!I... .•1:,•-r.1011'.,4' ;. • ,, ,,.•r,,l'..:/ •.:rr--.-:,...6":-.,.-:7.0.=... . 16sAti N GI° vmssitreavom JOG 1.43 IA407.013 64192 CLC veAH • • ‘ _ _ _ _ -- .. . . . . ' • -- - . • • sl • • .__....�va8r•-h+wtt'`•L: ia::t._.u5+:-._ti...s.;+...::w..•a --.--_��__,. ..._...�. • • BUSH,•ROED a HITCHINGS, 1•tc. EXHIBIT F. NORTH WETLAND DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION. OF LOT 7 OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN, ACCORDING. TO THE BINDING SITE FLAN THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME / / OF BINDING l SITE PLANS, PAGES S-_/1 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, , WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING A1' THE CORNER, COMMON :'O SAID LOT 7 AND LOTS 2 AND 3 OF SAID BINDING SITE PLAN; THENCE NORTH 88°09 '51" WEST 70. 00 .FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'50'09" EAST 472.81 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE CF SAID LOT 7;` THENCE SOUTH 87°50'47" EAST 70.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE. OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE SOUTH. 01.50'09" WEST i ,•,, 472.42 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. v_ SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. •. Le., • -"THE •PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE •-CONTAINS '33,083 SQUARE FEET (0.76 - i ,-- ACRES) , MORE OR LESS. d • ~ (v POWELL DEVF:OPMENT - 4 O ce BURLINGTON NORTHERN BSP ``' WILLIAM A. 3ICKOX, P.L.S. J F— W A JUNE 2, 1992. 1 N `� �v'w NiCf- 91407.08/SUR54B • ILI LJ (D /.C' OI, f . • JIJF— , CV 1 1 v t } if b —4i ii \Z3'0271.5$1.117 , •'" •- e:PME3 3/17/ . • O W O W • f 1 • • • I __ • _. -. • • • ''....L ' .. 67.5d 47 E-.• + 7aar •-r. J 1 r1y N • Q #�`Y_ ry 1 w .,, . -,1-3- 3 c.c.f7' .r;• , A 1 . I T:1. P0.B 'NoScale .••NCO•:: N B8•O9'5P.r O I N00'09'5/'Y/ • • O I _ t ''�' 1 ti.,� ! A.: ,/ t) .. 'L.) 1 . � J 49 i . i 1 I / .•••••''‘ / r J 7.5 // • U 2 W . 1A� • lJ l7 1.1ct ;'I-, I •L ! • - - ' - NORTH WETLAND.- SKETCH ,,_ O POWELL DEVELOPMENT= BjRLINGTON NORTHERN BINDIt4G SITE PLAN 0 /� (,� -1i-92 bWTCH/y r MIMED Dr. 1 r- o: :,,, �)E`�+ BUSH,ROED b HITCHINGS,INC. • , .. .,. f0. CC 1 i CIVIL lNGIN[[RS A LAND SURVIVORS I 1111 I \`,/,J�Y�I.iJll•fl) t m • f.A1 y+ SIATTLII,WWNMOTON 323111. . I I L Joe No.t)NQlAB 6.8.97 Clc wax I. ..�n,s 11„14_ 19e9 O� .SHINGI ,- - 1 • 1 . . r _ - -• • • • • FIRST AMENDMENT TO ,g ` ALCIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEr1 $ j, This Amendment is made and entered into by.and among i HCWA Realty Corp., a Washington corporation ("f") , Powell- Orillia Associates, a Washington general partnership ("Powell") , :1I9 ' .Eastgatte Theatre, Inc. , an Oregon corporation ("Pastgate" ) , Peter W. Powell ("P, Powell") and Lloyd W. Powell ("L. Powell") • M RECITALS HC and Powell previously have entered into a Reciprocal &Easement Agreement with Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated June 30, 1992, and recorded in the Official Records of King County, Washington, under Fee No. 9206302702 (the "Agreement") . A Powell subsequently conveyed Lot 1 (defined in the Agreement) to P. Powell and L. Powell who own Lot 1 as equal tenants in common. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Amendment, Eastgate is acquiring Lot 3 (defined in the Agreement as modified 8 by the lot line adjustment mentioned below) from HC. In 1 conjunction with that acquisition, the parties hereto (singly, an "Owner", and collectively, the "Owners") desire to clarify and restate certain provisions of the Agreement. l� AGREEMENT • Therefore, in consideration of the premises and other --1._ valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby l ' acknowledged, the Owners agree as .follows (unless otherwise indicated, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as are attributed to them in the Agreement) : 1. Each of the Owners warrants and represents to the other Owners that the warranting Owner owns fee title to the CI portion of the Shopping Center listed below and that the 0I warranting Owner has not created, assumed, or acquiesced to any indebtedness secured by liens encumbering the portion of the Shopping Center owned by such owner : S O • . 04 OMB • L C L. Powell and P. Powell Lot 1 C!'l CI HC Lot 2 Eastgate Lot 3 • Powell Lots 4, 6 I and 7 ' .The Owners also acknowledge and agree that the common boundary between Lot 2 and Lot 3 has been modified by Lot line adjustment reflected in Lot Line Adjustment Map recorded in the Official Records of King County, Washington, under Fee No. 4511299006. i 1 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCA FUI) FOR RECORD AT REQUEST. OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT • f RANSAMt ,� R CO. :gmtom AVE. NE P.O. HOX len • f : . FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEWEa I I 8• This Amendment is made and entered into by and among HCWA Realty Corp., a Washington corporation ("HQ") , Powell- • � Orillia Associates, a Washington general partnership ("Powell") , 3' Eastgate Theatre, Inc., an Oregon corporation ("Bastaate") , Peter W. Powell (" . Powell") and Lloyd W. Powell ("L. Powell") .. M P • RECITALS 1A . HC and Powell previously have entered into a Reciprocal i , Easement Agreement with Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions dated June 30, 1992, and recorded in the Official Records of King County, Washington, under Fee No. 9206302702 (the "Agreement") . Powell subsequently conveyed Lot 1 (defined in the Agreement) to P. Powell and L. Powell who own Lot 1 as equal tenants in common. • Contemporaneously with the execution of this Amendment, Eastgate is acquiring Lot 3 (defined in the Agreement as modified B by the lot line adjustment mentioned below) from HC. In M conjunction with that acquisition, the parties hereto (singly, an "Owner", and collectively, the "Owners") desire to clarify and restate certain provisions of the Agreement. AGREEMENT Therefore, in consideration of the premises and other J valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Owners agree as follows (unless otherwise indicated, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as are attributed to them in the Agreement) : 1. Each of the Owners warrants and represents to the other Owners that the warranting Owner owns fee title to the 01 ' portion of the Shopping Center listed below and that the 07 warranting Owner has not created, assumed, or acquiesced to any r, indebtedness secured by liens encumbering the portion of the r4 ' Shopping Center owned by such Ownei : O 04 � LR1 j CD QC L. Powell and P. Powell Lot 1 1 CI HC Lot 2 j Eastgate Lot 3 • • Powell Lots 4, -6 • and 7 III • 4 The Owners also acknowledge and agree that the common boundary between Lot 2 and Lot 3 has been modified by Lot line adjustment reflected in Lot Line Adjustment Map recorded in the Official Records of King County, Washington, under Fee No. 9511299006. 1 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL TILED FOR R:CORD AT REQUEST OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT lxnxslc1a CO. rro 141TH AVE. NE P.O. HUX14u $ELLEVUE,WA MID • • -. . !. . - ti Q. . I' _ 1 I .iJ 2. The third senten^e of Section 2.1 of the Agreement • is deleted and the following substituted in lieu thereof: • The Owner of each Lot agrees to construct and maintain parking on its Lot to serve the improvements erected from time to time on • such Lot equal to the greater of (i) the • - number of parking spaces required by applicable law at the time that building permits are issued for the improvements to be constructed, or (ii) the following ratio: L.Q parking Ratio Lots 1, 2 & 3 4.1 stalls for each 1,000 1 . square feet of Floor Area Lots 4, 6 & 7 5.0 stalls for each 1,000 ! .• 1 square feet of Floor Area . Crj Notwithstanding the foregoing parking requirements, if • any portion of Lot 3 is developed for the purpose of C7 operating a cinema, then such portion of Lot 3 shall be served by parking stalls equal to the greater of (x, U% the.number of parking stalls required by applicable law O with respect to theatre use at the time that building CV permits are issued for the improvements to be constructed, or (y) one (1) parking stall for every CZ • four (4) seats in the movie theatres erected on Lot 3; • provided, however, that if applicable law permits less intense parking for cinema use (i.e., one (1) parking • stall is allowed to serve more than four (4) seats in a '-inema) after January 1, 2n06, then the parking within such portion of Lot 3 that is used for the operation of a cinema may be reduced to the level permitted by applicable law so long as such reduction in parking does not materially and adversely affect the parking • within, or use of, Lots 4 and 6. 3. Sectior 3.1(d) is amended by adding the following • • sentences thereto: • Notwithstanding anything to th' contrary ! contained herein, the Owners acknowledge and f agree that Lot 3 may include del.elopment of up to three (3) outlot pads (the "Lot 3 Fads") , each containing up to 6,000 square feet of Floor Area, and such Lot 3 Pads may be situated anywhere within Lot 3 as the Owner thereof may designate from time to time • so long as the s; me do not (i) encroach upon - the building setback lines created by Section 3.1(b) of the Agreement, and (ii) lie I • west of the north-south line dividing the . portion of Lot 3 which is currently zonsd 2 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL • EASEMENT AGREEMENT owwiawuitm»uuu►wmervm • J • , j • -I a 0 - - , '`. •" . . • commercial arterial from the portion zoned medium industrial, such line being s approximately 140 feet west of the west right-of-way line of East Valley Highway and coinciding with the eastern boundary of Lot 4: provided, however, that such east-west limitation regarding the location of the Lot 3 Pads (x) shall not be applicable if Eastgate is precluded from constructing a cinema on Lot 3 and opening the same for business, and (y) shall not apply to any Pad lying south of a line coinciding with the northerly boundary of Lot 4. The Exclusive Building Area for Lot 3 shall be deemed to include the Lot 3 Pads. One of the Lot 3 Pads currently is expected to be developed in the portion of Lot 3 that lies near the intersection of Southwest 41st Street and East Valley Highway (the "south Pad") . If a cinema is erected on Lot 3 by Eastgate and opened for business, then Eastgate agrees, • solely for the benefit of the Owner of Lot 4, not to erect any improvements on the South Pad prior to January 1, 1999, other than such improvements as may be necessary to use the South Pad area for parking purposes; this covenant of Eastgate is solely for the benefit of Lot 4 and may be enforced only by the Owner of Lot 4. 01 CO 4. Section 4.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and G GO the following substituted in lieu thereof: O 04 4.1 Grant of Easements. Subject to the O provisions of section 15.13, each Owner, as 40 grantor, hereby grants to the other Owners, :n for the benefit of said other Owners and their respective tenants and such Owners' and tenants' customers, invitees and employees, a nonexclusive easement to use, for the purposes of obtr''ning access to and from the Shopping Center, she zoaavays and walkways situated in the Common Area and any facilities which min, be erected in the Common Area for the general 'se of customers of the Shopping Center (such as mass transit shelters) , all as more particularly located and described on the attached Site Plan, as the same may change from time to time. The III • foregoing grants of easements are not effective as to any Lot which is part of the Shopping Center until construction is commenced on such Lot. 3 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT arm,m inaluovwuwwm7.7 • 6 • • .• • . f _ " „. . , : . y mne effect o_ this amendment of Section 4.1 is to eliminate the cross-parking easements formerly contained therein which created cross-parking easements among all Lots in the Shopping Center. The Owners acknowledge and agree that the parking areas contained within their respective Lots shall be' sufficient to service all parking needs of the improvements to be constructed therein and that they do not require parking easements over the Lots of the 'other Owners. To give effect to the foregoing, each Owner hereby • quitclaims to the other Owners the parking easements which were created by Section 4.1 of the Agreement. Each Owner agrees to execute such additional documents and to give such rui.her i assurances as may be necessary to properly document the • agreements of the Owners set forth herein from time to time. The Owners agree to use their reasonable efforts to prevent their respective tenants and customers, and the customers of their respective tenants, from using the parking facilities serving • another Lot. 5. The second and third sentences of Section 4.3(b) of the Agreement are deleted and the following substituted in " lieu thereof: Eastgate agrees that Powell may temporarily • use a portion of Lot 3 situated to the east • • C of Lot 4 (out of and a part of the area I • C") cross-hatched and designated as the "powell . w-i ,taginq Area" on the Site Plan attached as Exhibit B to the Agreement) during the C) initial construction of the building on Lot 4 N and the building on Lot 6, provided that: • COO (iy Eastgate has not constructed or commenced • 01 the construction of building improvements on the Lot 3 Pad situated in the Powell Staging Area at the time that Powell requests use of the Powell Staging Area for the purposes permitted herein; (ii) the other Lot (Lot 4 • or 6, as the case may be) previously has been developed to the end that it is not available - to serve as a sta'ling area (each of Lots 4 • and 6 to.serve as staging areas for the other Lot ur...il they are developed) ; (iii) the portion of the Powell Staging Area to be used is no more than 10,000 squrre feet in size and is bounded on the west, south and east by the west, south and east boundaries of the • Powell Staging Area; (iv) Powell obtains all permits required to be obtained from • • applicable governmental authorities to allow it to use the designated staging area; and (v) Powell holds Eastgate harmless from all claims, causes of action and liabilities which may be asserted against Eastgate by • reason of Powell's use of the staging area. • 4 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT tswwuwnaiwmrwAutascmr.n 1-1 .J •''4"' tti.-a . • •:r *;.�.L'" !.1.to • �. ." "e'+. 1114. .r.`•.• .. _1 •i • • r c _ .. ..a;.: ro.:.6. •. - • 6. The fourth paragraph Of section 4.6 is deleted and the following substituted in lieu thereof: One sign may be located on Lot 7 in the location designated on the attached Site Plan. Such sign shall be divided into three ' equal blocks, one on top of the other. Any of the Owners of Lots 2, 3 or.7 initially may elect to construct such sign at the sole expense of the Owner electing to initiate such construction. The Owners who do not undertake the initial construction of such ', sign (Powell, HC or Eastgate, as the 'case may be) shall be entitled to use one of the sign . blocks to advertise their respective businesses by reimbursing the constructing Owner for one-third of the cost of construction of the sign. The constructing • Owner shall have sole control and use of each . sign block until such time as an Owner entitled to use a sign block elects to • contribute its one-third share of construction costs and use the sign block ' allocated to it. If HC elects to participate in the use of such' sign, HC shall be entitled 1 • to use the top block of such sign to C' advertise its business on Lot 2; if Eastgate elects to participate in the use of such w4 sign, then Eastgate shall be entitled to use • Crthe middle block to advertise its business on ' GCDLot 3; and if Powell elects to participate in I the use of the sign, then Powell shall be o CAD entitled to use the bottom block of the sign to advertise its businesses on Lot 7. The . Owners participating in the use of the sign • shall be obligated to share in the cost of i maintaining the sign in proportion to the • • number of sign blocks utilized by them. An i Owner shall have no obligation to pay any construction or maintenance costs with ' respect to such sign unless and until such Owner elects to , .,e the pace on the sign allocated to it. No businesses may be j advertised on such sign other than the businesses conducted on Lots 2, 3 and 7. . 7. Section 13.1 is amended by changing HC's address I i to: BomeBase, 3345 Michelson, Irvine, California 92715, Attn: f Vice President Real Est..te; and adding thereto Eastgate's 111 • address: 919 SW Taylor, Suite 900, Portland, Oregon 97205. ! 8. Section 15.10 of the Agreement is deleted and the • following substituted in lieu thereof: , 5 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL . I . 1. EASEMENT AGREEMENT awwoons,immani.. as. nm . s t 1 I- • 1 . v •• • . . • . . , , . 15.1' Wetlands. (a) sement Grants. Subject to_ the reservation set forth in Eection 15.10(bl , Powell hereby grants to HC • , a perpetual easement appurtenant to Lot 2 (the "BC Easement") over and across the portion of Lot 7 described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Subject to the reservation set forth in Section 15.10(bl , Powell also grants and conveys to Eastgate a perpetual ' easement appurtenant to Lot 3 (the "Eastgate Easement") over and across the portion o� Lot ' 7 described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto. Subject to the reservation set forth in Section 15.10(bl , Eastgate hereby grants to Powell a perpetual easement appurtenant to. Lots 4 and 6 (the "powell Easement") over and across the portion of Lot 3 described in Exhibit "C" attached hereto. The HC, Eastgate and Powell Easements (the "Easements") may be used by the Owners of the Lots .benefitted thereby (Lots 2, 3, 4 and 6, respectively) to provide wetlands mitigation., • storm drainage and storm water retention to . ,� serve Lots 2, 3, 4 and 6, respectively, in !. 1 9.4 . compliance with the requirements of the City f of Renton and any other governmental O authorities with .jurisdiction over the 04 development and use of Lots 2, 3, 4 and 6. O The improvements which have been erected or • (d may be.erected by such grantees .in, on and under the land encumbered by the Easements f - (the "Easement Arens") may include (without limitation) bioswales, retention ponds, filtration systems, storm sewers, storm drains, and similar facilities. The HC • Easement'shall be appurtenant to and for the I • benefit of Lot 2 and shall run with title to Lot 2, regardless of whether any subsequent instruments of con,..tyance covering Lot .: specifically identify the HC Easement therein. The Eastgate Easement shall be appurtenant to and for the benefit of Lot 3 and shall run with title to hot 3, regardless of whether any instrument of conveyance • covering Lot 3 specifically identifies the - f{ Eastgate Easement. The Powell Easement shall be appurtenant to and for the benefit of ' Lots 4 and 6 and shall run with title to , Lots 4 and 6, regardless of whether any instrument of conveyance covering Lot 4 or Lot 6 specifically identifies the Powell Easement. The respective grantees of the . Easements (the "Grantees") shall be responsible for maintaining any drainage, 6 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL . ••• EASEMENT AGREEMENT mswwuoos ,iw,vwuwaccn _ �1-1 ,� • - i i . .,' t A . ` . is t . . • Seattle metropolitan area (the "Second Engineers") selected by the Owners of Lots 2 and 3 and engaged at the expense of the Owner of Lot 7; (ii) the use of the Drainage Facilities by the Owner of Lot 7 must be implemented in a fashion that will not interfere with the ongoing use and operation of the Drainage Facilities or reduce the capability . of the Drainage Facilities to serve Lots 2 and 3; (iii) the Drainage Facilities to be used to serve any portion of Lot 7 situated north of the Driveway Easement Property (the Eastgate cr HC Drainage Facilities, as the case may be) shall be i determined by the Engineers and the Second j Engineers; (iv) the Drainage Facilities will not be used to provide storm water retention and drainage services to the portion of Lot 7 situated south of the Driveway Easement Property (" out Lot 7") ; (v) no use may be made of Lot 7 which involves the manufacture, use or release of Hazardous Substances other than the operation of a gasoline service station on South Lot 7 (no Q) . gasoline service station being permitted on North Lot 7) and customary use of cleaning solvents and • C) the like in compliance with Environmental Laws (as ,1"4 used herein, .the phrase "Hazardous Substances" • • X,' shall mean all hazardous, toxic, infectious or radioactive substances, wastes or materials CD N listed, defined or regulated by any Environmental Law and specifically also shall include petroleum, Cr) oil and its fractions, asbestos, urea- formaldehyde, and polychloribiphenyls; as used herein, the phrase "Envjrc,nmental Law" shall mean all Federal, state.and local statutes, regulations and decrees pertaining to the protection of any I aspect of human health or the environment that are f now or hereafter applicable to the Shopping j Center) ; (vi) should any of South Lot 7 be used for the purposes of operating a gasoline station, then, in addition to complying with the . requirements of applicable laws, the Owner proposing ,.o construct such gasoline station shall i • require that such service station facility be operated by, or licensed by, one of the major oil companies, and shall obtain from the operator of the service station either an indemnity or insurance policy from such operator for the . benefit of the Owners of Lots 2 and 3 (and subject to their advance written approval, which will not be unreasonably withheld) which protects them from • loss, damage, liability or expense resulting from the operation of such service station facility and any Hazardous Substances which may be released or emanate therefrom; and (vii) the Owner of Lot 7 ' • shall pay, in advance of its use of the applicable 8 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT iswwiroonsnonsinumiamarim • . 1. • . , Drainage Facility, its proportionate share of the original cost of constructing the porti,n of the Detention Facility used for outfall purpc-,a `.ased on its projected use of the Detention Facility. f To the extent that any of the obligations of the Owner of Lot 7 set forth in subparagraphs (i) through (vii) above contemplate continuing or ongoing performance, the Owner of Lot 7 shall be obligated to comply with such obligations so long as it uses the Easement Areas. If the Owner of + Lot 7 elects to use the Drainage Facilities, then the Owner of Lot 7 also shall be obligated to ! construct, at its sole cost and expense, any improvements to or enlargements of the Drainage • Facilities required to accommodate its use thereof. All costs of maintaining and repairing the Drainage Facilities other than repair costs resulting from the negligence of an Owner or its agents or employees (which shall be paid for solely by such Owner) shall be paid by the Owners sharing the use of such Drainage Facilities in 0) proportion to the gross number of square feet of CIland owned by each Owner which is served by the 4.0 Drainage Facilities. If, as and when the (,' conditions set forth herein are satisfied, the p Owners of Lots 2 and 3, as applicable, shall grant N easements to the Owner of Lot 7 over and across O the Lot 2 and 3 Easement Areas, consistent in form CD and substance to the grants made in figgtion CI ;5.10(a) and the terms of this Section 15.10(b) . i (c) Additional provisions Regarding Lots 4 and 6. 1 To facilitate Powell's use of the Eastgate Drainage Facilities to provide drainage services tc Lots 4 and 6, the su-face drainage system to be installed in Lot 3 will be designed and constructed to accommodate those drainage needs according to the design requirements of the Engineers. Powell shall arrange and pay for the design and construction of a storm water collection sr-tem to serve Lots 4 and 6 running from a catch e..sin mituated on Lot 3 to a boundary of Lot 4 or 6, such work to be done simultaneously with the installation of a drainage system on Lot 3. No other d •ainage work may be undertaken on Lot 3 for the benefit of Lots 4 and 6 after completion of the initial drainage system. The bioswale and outfall components of the Eastgate IIIDrainage Facilities shall be sized to serve Lots 4 and 6 and Powell shall pay Eastgate the • incremental cost of increasing the size of such facilities to serve Lots 4 and 6 (as determined by the Engineers) as and when such work is completed. Lots 4 and 6 shall be subject to the use 9 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL uaoaa�m �a .� EASEMENT AGREEMENT • I. t J i— t sill • 1.. — ' rectrictions bet forth in Section 35.10(b) (v) and (vi) - 9. Section, 15.11 of the Agreement is amended by deleting the square footages of each Lot shown therein for • purposes of calculating proportionate shares of the maintenance costs of the Driveway Easement Area, and substituting the following in lieu thereof: lei: SQUARE FUO1 E Lot 1 to be determined* j Lot 2 486,190 . Lot 3 535,094 • • Lot 4 35,000 Lot 6 35,000 Lot 7 30,000 *The square footage of Lot 1 for purposes of this i provision shall be determined in accordance with r) the provisions of Section 15,11• • • T, . O 10. The first sentence of the second paragraph of CSection 15.11 is deleted and the following substituted in lieu thereof: C7 The Owner of Lot 3 shall construct a private roadway within the Driveway Easement Property in accordance with the requirements of the City of Renton. The Owner of Lot. 3 shall maintain the Driveway Easement Area to a reasonable standard as designated by such Owner in its reasonable • discretion, and the other Owners shall be obligated to • contribute their proportionate share of maintenance costs as set forth herein. 11. The Agreement is amended by addirg the followinc, provisions thereto: 15.12. i.:latel Agreement. Contemporaneously with the . execution of this Agreement, Eastgate and HC have joined in the execution of a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions end Restrictions and Grant of Easements and Quit Claim of Certain Parking Easements which is to be filed for record in • the Official Records of King County, Washington (the "yeclaration") • As between the Owner of Lot 2 and the Owner . of Lot 3, the terms and provisions of the Declaration shall • supersede and prevail over the terms and provisions of this Agreement to the extent of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of the Declaration and the provisions • of this Agreement or to the extent that any provisions of the Declaration are more burdensome than the provisions of • 10 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL • EASEMENT AGREEMENT owwuoom"m»vmuw4. .7) 1 N _J :.4'. ' 6 4 ' • • • this Agreement. Lots 1, 4, 6 and 7 are not encumbered by any provision cf the Declaration. 15.13 Expansion of Lot 7 Building Area. The Owner of Lot 7 may develop the portion of Lot 7 lying north of the Driveway Easement Property ("North Lot 7") provided that the following covenants and conditions are satisfied: (i) if access to North Lot 7 shall be obtained via the Driveway Easement Property, then the square footage of Lot 7 to be used for purposes of calculating shares of maintenance costs • under Section 15.11 shall be modified accordingly; (ii) notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in section 2.1 of the Agreement, all parking required by applicable law to serve any improvements constructed on North Lot 7 shall be contained wholly within North Lot 7 and shall be deemed sufficient if in compliance with applicable law; (iii) the Owner of North Lot 7 shall construct and maintain a fence or other barrier along the western boundary of the Easement Areas to prevent the customers and invitees of the Owner of North Lot 7 from crossing or entering upon 0) the Master Easement Areas; (iv) in addition to the other C) uses prohibited by the Agreement, no use may be made of m North Lot 7 which would involve the manufacture, release, ''4 disposal or use of Hazardous Substances; (v) any development 'r' undertaken upon North Lot 7 shall be completed in compliance O04 with all applicable laws, including (without limitation) the requirements of the Army Corps of Engineers; (vi) no LID improvements to be constructed on North Lot 7 shall exceed cl 45 feet in height; and (vii) no part of the Common Area - other than the Driveway Easement Property may be used to provide access to North Lot 7 and the Owner of North Lot 7 hereby quitclaims to the Owners of Lots 2 and 3 all easements created by section 4.1 to the extent that they encumber Lots 2 and 3. The consent of the Owners of Lots 2 and 3 with respect to development of North Lot 7. set forth herein shall not constitute a waiver of.any rights which those Owners may be entitled to assert with respect tc future development of North Lot 7 in their capacities as the owners of adjoining property. • l0.14 Exchange of Lotr. Eastgate and Powell may elect I to exchange the South Pad ark.a tor Lot 6. The Owners of Lots 1 and 2 hereby approve of such exchange and , agree that Eastgate and Powell may enter into and consummate an agreement to teat effect without the necessity of obtaining any further consent of the Owners of Lots 1 and 2 with respect thereto provided J that any improvements to be constructed upon the South Pad after completion of such exchange shall not exceed • 22 feet in height, the building envelope on the South Pad shall be generally in the configuration shown on Exhibit "F" attached hereto and any signage erected on the South Pad shall not materially impair the visibility of the MC Building from ground level at the 11 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT ow iconsnmwvwmwtren.7 _ .. _.._ — I f a '3 . .intersection of South:'est 41st Street and East Valley .a Highway. If, as and when such exchange is consum:,.ited, the land acquired by Eastgate shall be subjected to the terms of the Declaration and the land acquired by . Powell shall be released from the terms of the Declaration and the Owners shall execute such documents as may be necessary to evidence the foregoing. Notwithstanding such exchange, the lot designations • used herein shall be transferred such that the South Pad thereafter shall be referred to as _''j,ot 6" f;,1 rut poses of this Agreement and the land formerly • designated as Lot 6.shall be referred to as part of Lot 3. i 15.15 Utility Easement. Powell, as Owner of Lot 7, I hereby grants and conveys to the other Owners, for the benefit of the Shopping Center, a perpetual, non- • exclusive easement over and across the Driveway • 0) Easement Property for the purpose of installing, E operating, maintaining and replacing, from time to ` time, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, electrical, gas, E telephc•ne, cable and other utility line3 to serve improvements to be constructed in the Shopping Center. ` t • 4 Any work undertaken in .the Driveway Easement Property � at the behest of an Owner to install or replace any (D utility lines shall be done in a good and workmanlike • n manner at the sole expense of such Owner and in a ` manner that will not unreasonably interfere with the use of the Driveway Easement Property' by the other Owners. • 15.16 Pv.e Restrictins. No purLion or the Shopping Center . shall be used for any of the following uses or purposes: a. Any use which would constitute a public or private nuisance. b. Any.use which generates noise or sot•nd that is 'objectionable due to intermittence, beat, frequency, • shrillness or loudness (other than noises typically associated •-:t:, a 'home improvement store or theatre/cinema) . . c. Any use which would generate excessive quantity of dust, dirt or fly ash. i_ d. . Any use involving a heightened risk of fire, explc-sion or other damaging or dangerous hazard, including i the storage, display or sale of explosives or fireworks. e. Any distillation, refinin r or mining, operations. 9, smelting, agriculture - • 12 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL 44 �; EASEMENT AGREEMENT com����� Z . y , .0 � E ,6 t 'a. f. For the purpose of operating a mobile home or trailer court, labor camp, junkyard, stock yazd raising business. g. Any drilling for and/or removal of subsurface substances. h. Any dumping of garbage or refuse, other than in enclosed, covered receptacles intended for such purpose. i. Any mortuary or similar service, establishment. j. Any commercial laundry or dry-cleaning plant; provided, however, this prohibition shall not be applicable to any premises if oriented to pick up and delivery by the '► ultimate consumer and there are only nominal on-site supporting facilities. k. Any automobile body and fender repair work. 1. Any flea market, swap meet, "second hand" store or • "s.tplus" store. a. Any adult book store or any so-called "sin" uses 7 including (without limitation) nude dancing, pornographic displays, displays of "X-rated" materials or films, massage parlor or off-track betting facility. 15.17 Additional North Lot 7 Use@. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Sections 2.1 or 2.3 of the Agreement, North Lot 7 may be used for the purposes of operating a bowling alley, skating rink, health club or bingo parlor or for industrial, warehouse or light manufacturing uses, if permitted by applicable law. No other amendment or modification is made or intended to be made to the Agreement and the Agreement, as modified hereby, shall remain in full force and effect as therein written. III • • • L:. r 12A- FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT awumam mrvww� oon.� E•• ++' • • • ' • • • 'Executed in multip:.e courterparts to be effective as of the 8th day of February, 1996. 1 FOWELL: Eastga atre, Inc., n Powell-Orillia Associates, a Oreg poration Washington General Partnership By: ! :lame: i Title: By: _ Lloyd W. Powell, .General Partner . HCWA Realty Corp. , a Washington By: corporation Peter W. Powell, General Partner By: P. POWELL C•) Name: Title: • "r Peter W. Powell • By:CD L. POWr CD Name • C) Title: i Lloyd W. Powell EXHIBITS: "A" - HC Easement • "B" - Eastgate Easement "C" - Powell Easement "D" - Lot 2 Easement Area "E" - Lot 3 Easement Area "F" - South Pad Envelope STATE OF OREGON ) County of µVS �) se. ,! This instrument was ack ow ed•e• before me thi= day of r.y I_ • ,.. , 1996, by of Eas gate Theatre, Inc— • as i the corpora ion. • an O -g. '1 �-ti n./ v.�1! of ,-:;.:i J4GK!E WILKES NI wi/v.-,M MAW 09 k ` .;., C71.0 v+,NO C.,:! O• PU:LiC FOR OREGON -_ -.,,.:;:..�,: ur:.`4.tSi E�=� a. ,. ,�„ My �•mmission Expirer: - ' 13 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCA • ti.' EASEMENT AGREEMENT ;f- '_ 7. • . i ..ii • • Execu in multiple counterparts to bs ef1'c:�.`__Y•v as of day of G , 1996. ?DWELL: tat. Theatre, Inc., an Powell-Orillia Associates, a ►gon corporation Washington General Partnership By: Lloyd W. Powell, General Partner RealtyCorp. , Washington B : P4 Y poration Peter W. Powell, General Partner r. PowELL • and J Wei her�Qr nior Vice regi ent Peter W. Powell • k L. POWELL Annur T. , Jr. • AutnonzeQ Signatory Lloyd W. Powell HC Easement Eastgate Easement Powell Easement Lot 2 Easement Area Lot 3 Easement Area • South Pad Envelope OF OREGON . ) ) es. [ • : or This instrument was ackno.ledged before as this _ day , 1996, by , es :tgata Theatre, Inc., an Oregon corporation, on behalf of • Irpvration. III • NOTARY PUBLIC FOR OREGON My Commission Expires: IRST AMEJ/OMEET TO RECIPROCAL • ASEKENT AGREEMENT owwvieny,uenseeuemmonn a • • • • • • I Executed In mu'.tiple counterparts the 8th day of. February, p to be effective as of •. Y, 1996. xE: POWELr,: . Eastgate Theatre, Inc, , an Powell-orillia Associates,, a Oregon corporation Washington • gton General i ' Pa rt nnee Lip • Title•__`'— - By: / , / tom` r, Llol W. Powelk, , General \ ; Par�nor A Realty • I HCcorpurationorp a Washington By: • Pater Pore 1 1, ---- P.�rtner General l ' dy• �� -.ItL C; Name: _ o% T1tler-- - } C7 -. T. Peter U. Powell ` - • I C Name: • ____.. f CEO Title: CV i r' v' I W. owall i ET:• I i "A" -' HC Easement "B" - East ate • "C" 4 Easement Powell Easement "D" - Lot 2 Easement Area ��£� - Lot 3 I Easement Area t "F" - South Pad Envelope t STATE OF OREGON ) • County of ) es. This instrument w of 1996, by was acknowledged before of Enctgntq Theatre no this day • ' the corporation. Inc. , a`n Oon rccperation, on eha 0 NOTARY PUBLIC FOR `oR�y;ON 1` My Commission Lxpires: ''"•• _ 13 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL �� EASEMENT AGREEMENT -� awry m►tf.�wm+au :.,-- Lloyd L, �MQ7J1 •?ate; ;•� .. • }'1i'r•'' J !.!'•i ' •B..1.yr • 4 '-':;i1:72-':::-:.- • • , . • ct1 ' 3 , . . . • , ; , . • COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. ) ) OB. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX ) ' . On 6k4a2/ 1,17b. before me, /.Lt,4.M..�c.J• e/4.41, a Notary Public in ardor said state, personally appeared ' Edward J.Weis ger , personally known to me (or provedn,,,, to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence', to b.v t:a person EY . '•• whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and P-..-........ . J • acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in his/hee;/ 41;•,•i :. authorised capacity, and that by his/her signature on the J 1 ' •k 'J':'_ - instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf of whicVItd! „ i a : person acted, executed the instrument. c.\ . , d u►�`*•�r WITNESS my hand and official seal. • .(Y ;• (7i C),ulU SZ. 1 i c) .. Notary Public in and fo said State y C) CO 4 4.4 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ;L ) us. • CD COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX ) N CD on F4/ 1 /fib, before me, Lf �s./lcf, a Notary a* C) Public „ig,anc .S s 'state, personally appeared f . 1% I 1K JJJ , personally known to me! (or proved . to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in his/h. ......Ey authorised capacity, and that by his/her signature on tho •p."... . instrument, the person, or the entity upon behalf of whit the 'i .� • parson acted, executed the instrument. ....- W ` _1 �• u. WITNESS my hand and official seal. 1141 •,'.. en a.--, . ` Notary Public in and for s id seat** . ( �' , 1 1.1I/Cc... .... L/..• ...__• •.J. 1�.) -....,MM......' . • I 1 11 14 - FIRST AMENDMEN" 1'O RECIPROCAL • ' _ EASEMENT AGREEMENT awwumnvnta lummanainm - F • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) es. County of ) f On this day of , 1996, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public-in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Peter W. Powell, 1 known to be the person who executed this instrument in his individual capacity and as General Partner of Powell-Orillia Associates, a Washington general partnership, the partnership that executed the foregoing instrument, aid acknowledged the instrument to be his free and voluntary a':t and the free and voluntary act and deed of that partnership for the uses and . purposes therein mentioned, and on oath s•:ated that he was authorized to execute the instrument on b.thalf of the partnership. WITNESS my hand and official se31 hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at . My Commission Expires: STATE OF ARIZONA ) k es. County of•)/i.,r/;re•,c/-, ) On this 1 day of i- ft'}� 1:96, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and fdk tte State of Arizona, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Lloyd W. Powell, known to be the person who executed this instrument in his individual capacity and as General Partner of Powell-Orillia Associates, a Washington general partnership, the partnership that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the instrument to be his free and voluntary act and the free and voluntary act and deed of the- partnership for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, aaa on oath stated that ho was • authorized to execute the instrument on behalf of the partnership. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. • I F.w==•a-�.+n�: NOTAR PUBLIC in and for :the State t.• =��--- •- �^"""" of Ar zone, residing at My Commission Expires: el? �S'` I91/ - 15 - FIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL - EASEMENT AGREEMENT MANIRtIUH1mY /1“144f40p7,N i. 1 M • ' FEJ a7-•56 :S:Bo ID: -WILLIFIISON 1EL NO:503-196-29M 111,3 P15 ..--..,........ 1 • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. • County of / ) • On this /L day of 2, 1996, before me, the • . undersigned, a Notary Publio in and fbr the State of Washington, . duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Peter W. Powell, known to be the person who executed this instrument in his • • individual capacity and as General Partner of• Pov.11-Orillia Azsor!-t..a, a Washington general partnership, the partners:ip that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the instrument to be his free and voluntary act and the free and voluntary act and deed of that partnership for the uses and • purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument on behalf of the partnership. • WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the • 1 day and year first above written. C.) i r 1 NOL AAUC r I SIA1fOFefeeeMe r `� I y�,,,,C1nfge4ACta�a , N ARY PUBL IC in and for the S ate n '-1 ' t,A,A000r++'rtf +SM16WM ' of Washington, residing at •c / O ; ' •Ply Commission Expires: •/ • • N . O . CD STATE OF ARIZONA ) C) ) ss. County of ) On this day of , 1996, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Arizona, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Lloyd W. Powell, i. known to be the person who executed this Instrument in his individual capacity and as General Partner of Powell-Orillia Associates, a Washington general partnership, the partnership that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the instrument to be his free and voluntary act and the free and voluntary act and d nd of that partnership for the uses and ' purposes therein. 4centinned, and on oath stated that he was I • authorized to execute the instrument on buhalf of the ! I partnership. I WITNESS my band and official seal hereto affixed the ! • day and year first above written. j: I I tF NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Arizona, residing at _ ! . My Commission Expires: I . __ 15 - TIRST AMENDMENT TO RECIPROCAL • EASEMENT AGREEMENT .7) I 4� • 6 f • 06/1896 16:57 2868228758 H D A PAGE 82 Horton Dennis&Associates,Inc. HDA Consulting Engineers,Planners&Surveyors EXHIBIT "A" -HC EASEMENT • THAT PORTION OF LOT 7, BURLINGTON NORTHERN BINDING SITE PLAN • (BSP-014-92). PER MAP RECORDED IN VOLUME 161 OF PLATS, PAGES 8 THROUGH 11 INCLUSIVE, UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9206302696, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SITUATE IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTH 87.50'47' WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 70.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01'50'09' WEST PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7 A DISTANCE OF 553.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88.09'51' EAST 70.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTH 01'50'09* EAST ALONG SAID LINE 553.30 FEET TO i HE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 38,744 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS. akie • • • • • Second Avenue South, 1Hr*Lmsd Washington 98039, Pone (700 122-2525, Fax (206) g224758 ikkisse • IlwwcAes • Swim • �.• r - t • .• _: •. . , ' •a_ • a+ 02/06/19' i6'°' 2.366228758 H D A PAGE 03 • Horton Dennis&Associates,Inc. H DA Cn- g Engineers,Planners&Surveyors • EXHIBIT "B"-EASTGATE E'A.rFMEFJT THAT POP .ION OF LOT 7, BURLINGTON NORTHERN BINDING SITE PLAN ! (BSP-014 ;), PER MAP RECORDED IN VOLUME 161 OF PLATS. PAGES 8 THROUGH • 11 INCL►.SIVE, UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9206302696, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SITUATE IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE • S EAST, '. M., BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE SOUTH 01'50'09' WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF 553.30 FEET TO THE POINT OF Cr) BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST LINE SOUTH 01'50'09" • r) ! WEST 162.63 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 28'33'51' s I WEST 155.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'50'09" EAST 301.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88.09'51' EAST 70.00 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 16,249 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS. CD n • a�u \thu. • wows .iot►17 • • • • - _ • .• ' '; ";' $20 Second Avenue South, Kirtiand Washington 911033. Phone (206) 122-2525, Fax(206)8224758 't• ,1 I 12*athL • Msase••.hos • Barka • • • • a2/06/1996 16:57 2060228750 H D A PAGE 04 Horton Dennis&Associates,Inc. HDA Consulting Engineers,Planners&Surveyors EXHIBIT "C" -POWELL EASEMENT • THAT PORTION OF LOT 3, CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 106 OF SURVEYS,PAGE 180, UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9511299006. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SITUATE IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH 88'09'S1' EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 113.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01'50'09'WEST 426.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'05'25'WEST 211.54 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE NORTH 01°50'09' .4 EAST 71.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28'33'51'EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE 218.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'50'09' EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE 162.63 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. • CONTAINING 64,976 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS. ae,.<40,S. "„. A » fait I • 20 Second'OVUM South, Kirkland, Washington 98033, Phone(2od)dl2-Jns, Fax (106) 822-8758 .. Kithiand • Wea ee • Defies a r r2/06/1 10:::' 2068228758 H D A PAGE es I II Horton Denis&Associates,Inc. .H DA . Consulting Engineers,Planners Surveyors ,, . EXIT"D" -LOT 2 EASEMENT AREA i I� THAT PORTION OF LOT 2, CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AS • RECORDED IN VOLUME 106 OF SURVEYS,PAGE 180, UNDER RECORDING NUMBER • 9511299006, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SITUATE IN SECTION 30. ' I TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST. W.M., BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH ,.) 87.50'47'EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 83.38 FEET TO THE BEGINNING I c*; . OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 605.87 FEET: E c', I THENCE IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, PASSING J 1 THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°48'55' A DISTANCE OF 29.77 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01'50'09'WEST 553.40 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2: THENCE N NORTH 88'09'51' WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 113.15 FEET TO THE WEST LINE- O I OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTH 01'50'09" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 553.30 I CD FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 62,577 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS. �s . t 1 i Mai I LA ,tee, •,,.,r • • E I. l . 1-11f20 Second A.ew ,South, lir#lLw4 w�}/ • toil.,. w 98033, Fume R06)822-2525, Far (706) 82247Sd . r1• ' Cili.. • We ratio' • Burke I • • • a. 02/.06/1996 16:57 2068228758 H D A PAGE 06 \ . Horton Dennis&Associates,Inc. \ - HDA Consulting Engineers,Planners&Surveyors . r IEXHIBIT "E"-LOT 3 EASEMENT AREA ' ITHAT PORTION OF LOT 3, CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AS ' RECORDED IN VOLUME 106 OF SURVEYS,PAGE 180,UNDER RECORDING NUMBER ' 9511299006. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON, SITUATE IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., BEING MORE PARTICULARLY IDESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: I BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH 01 ' 88'09'51' EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF 113.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH Cr) ' 01'50'09"WEST 426.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'05'25'WEST 211.54 FEET TO THE ' WEST LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE NORTH 01'50'09" x EAST 71.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28'33'51'EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE O ' 218.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'50'09" EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE [`.i 162.63 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. O Ca C7 CONTAINING 64,476 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS. t afip O.....,. �elipio J u►r� ' • sings sliest? • I • 310 Second Avenue South, larkta.d, Washington 98033, Phone (206) 822-2525, Far(206) d22-8758 {' •' 1 • • 1 f N0150'12E - 20.00' !1LIt1_1_i_L _ -- (:r -i— I = ha �yI I .o 3 N89'0V2S'W -68.03' = C 1 I I 1-" I N013o'12-E - 96.77' — -.., -1I1 fi al _.JI1IIl7 IIIIIIII IIIIII1111 s1 • w '° - S , . T , . r.„, ct ' 1T _ • ✓ is f I . , 1 69. - o LO ~ � No15o'12t - 210.00• z '� V� (1 — — '� - = air • . i,..- , uw `It ikit74013012-E - 210.00' • 01.-a I I C ..� - ' M .l COV' ( 31 —, fa••-• 4 E.1' I [ •� N 1 z N01 WO4"E - 210.00' _ 'Imel lam oar ps' " ' "r•"' - t 1 4 I I I V a - - —1g 1 �� • i r�«. Illllflllllllllll11�I1111(lilll�llllllll� •.► In �Ii1WII '.: • I 4 Ail • Ir gL�left: 111ln 1 ' • I -N68'49'45'E - 39.11' N01'S0.09\E - 768.04' 1 8,wivo,r f 6cETSOZO9G EAST VALLEY HIGHWi ; .-' ` • a 1 ..b V• •./{ • h • 1 • • .AFTER.RECORDING RETURN TO PETER POWELL 737 MARKET ST o KIRKLAND, WA. 98033 e.BEKENT AGREEMENT i - This Easement Agreement ("Agreement") is made on this / day , • of March, 1996 by and between POWELL-GRILL/A ASSOCIATES, a s3 ;,;� Washington general partnership ("Grantor") and JARWEBT BT3EL fi CORPORATION, a.. O .�n corporation ("Grantee") . Grantor,and :. Grantee agree to of the following terms and conditions, including the recitals. i DECTIOI 11 RECITALS 1.1 Grantor owns that certain real property (the "Servient r '1 • Estate") described as follows: ": Lot 7, Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, according to City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded C-.' June 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 8 through 11, .:h`.^ Z inclusive, under King County Recording No. 9206302696. •-1 '; Cl 1.2 Grantee owns that certain real property (the "Dominant ,.4 ( . r) Estate") described as follows: \ Lot B, Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, ^ -:' according to City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded • r ; June 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plate, Pages 8 through 11, "'!;,`.. inclusive, under King County Recording No. 9206302696; .;�;",, and • •,e • Parcel A of Short Plat No. 378-79, according to the short ; - ,• plat recorded under King County Recording No. 7909249001. :. 1.3 Attached hereto as exhibit h is a description of what • shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Easement Property". The fix" Easement Property is a portion of the Servient Estate. Attached • •ai'; •,:- hereto as exhibit A-1 is a drawing showing the Easement Property - 'i<: -crosshatching. ' 1.4 Grantee wishes to have access over and certain utility .11.! ' rights under the Easement Property. Grantor is willing to grant .,'o- 'i.:.:' ,: such rights to G) .ntee on the terms and conditions contained in - this Agreement. ? ' • sECTION 21 GRAIIT 0P EA5ENEJT •/ _ � '' • : 2.1 Subject to the other terms and conditions outlined in t �� •. this Agreement, Grantor hereby grrnts to Grantee a non-exclusive ▪ . easement easement over and under the Easement Property for purposes of (1) =. ;• • obtaining pedestrian and/or vehicular ingress to and egress fros .}▪ r1' % I • S the 'Dominant Estate and (2) fros time to time installing and •: PSI.: ': ' maintaining in the subsurface of the Easement Property store sewer, 1364/053 1/zaI% -1- FILED FOR RECORD AT REOUE3T16Rs4 - I owuavreetvrneaEss EXCl:E la NOT REQU1RE1IRA ATlON 7171E INSURANCE CO. t•' Kn�r,Cc.Records Waco 320106TH AVE NE By \ \ L\XL1prq.D BELLEVUE.A 98009 , ,IlIl . _ • • c . . . .,..1.. • sanitary sewer, electrical, gas, telephone, cable and other utility systems serving the Dominant Estate. Such easement rights shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as the "Easements". 2.2 Grantor represents and warrants that Grantor is the owner of the Servient Estate and has the right to grant the Easements, • • and that, subject to the terms of this Agreement, Grantee has the right to quietly enjoy the Easements. „(";=:,w 3: DURATION Vr_Eha g . The Easements granted in .this Agreement shall be perpetual in duration. BEC'PION 4: CONSTRUCTION Or ROAD . 4.1 Inconsideration for the above grant of the Easements, Grantee hereby agrees that it will commence on or before that day which is ninety (90) days after receipt of the requisite building • permit(s) or removal of the required surcharge, whichever is later, and complete (subject to force majeure delays beyond Grantee's reasonable control) on or before that date which is one (1) year after the commencement date, at Grantee's sole expense, the road improvements depicted on Exhibit D, which is attached hereto and • • `, incorporated herein by this reference (such road improvement rork shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Road Work") . Grantee • ,L shall pursue diligently and in good faith the requisite permit(s) riand the commencement and completion of the required surcharge work „4 so as to yield a commencement date for the Road Work that isas rl close to the date of this Agreement as is reasonably possible. Grantee shall cause the Road Work to be completed in a good and J; workmanlike manner, in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations .and without undue delay once the Road Work has commenced. In addition, Grantee agrees to keep the Servient Estate free of any liens arising out of or related to the Road Work, and if a lien is nonetheless filed against the Servient Estate arising • out of or relating to the Road Work, Grantee ag-eeR to pi'omotlr post a bond at Grantee's expense in accordance with the terms of RCW 60.04.141, as the same may be amended, so as to release the • Servient Estate 'rom such lien. Before signing any construction contracts- for nll or any portion of the Road Work, Grantee shall submit the name of the proposed contractor or contractors to Grantor, together with copies of the proposed construction contract(s) and schedule(s) , all of which shall be subject to the review and approval of Grantor, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. • 4.2 HCWA Realty Corp,. a Washington corporation ("HCWA") is • the current owner of Lot 2, Burlington Northern, a binding site • ' plan, according to City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded June 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 8 through 11, inclusive, • 1366/063:3/211/% -z- uWOIT4 . ss rau/PO ELL/rAsr • • • • under King County Recording No. 9206302696. A port'.:+, of the roar' described in E7chibit B will. cross over an existing underground storm water retention outfall pipe installed by HCWA. Grantee and Grantor hereby jointly and severally agree to indemnify and hold HCWA and its successors, assigns, agents, employees and invitees ' harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, liabilities, ' losses and expenses (including attorneys' fees incurred with or without litigation or on appeal) . arising out of or in any way . related to any damage to or interference with the functioning of • such pipe caused by the Road Work, use of the road or any utility installation or maintenance work undertaken 'by on 'or on behalf of Grantee or Grantor. Grantor and Grantee hereby agree that HCWA has • given sufficient consideration for this indemnity and that HCWA may rely on this indemnity even though it is not a party to this Agreement. SECTION 5: UTILITIES 5.1 Except as provided in Section 5.2, any utilities j installed under the Easement Property for the benefit of the Dominant Estate shall be installed at the sole expense of Grantee 1. and shall be maintained in a good condition at the sole expense of Grantee. Similarly, of course, if Grantor elects to install any utilities under (or above) the Easement Property, such shall be ;,; installed and maintained in a good condition at Grantor's sole expense. Prior to commencing any utility installation or repair work and prior to Grantor connecting to any utility system (t installed by Grantee pursuant to Section 5.2, the party wishing to rt perform the installation, repair or connection work (hereinafter 1 c? referred to as the "Working Party) shall (1) provide the other uo party with a written description of the work' in question (including, but not limited ' to, information regarding location/layout, sizing. and invert) , as well as the proposed time ' frames within which the work will be done and (2) .use reasonable good faith efforts to accommodate reasonable timing revisions proposed by the other party (the Working Party shall agree to conduct the work in question after normal business hours if the work will materially interfere with either access or the provision of utility services to the other party's parcel). In all events, the Working Party shall (1) take reasonable steps to minimize any • disruption to the .;::her party caused by the work in question and • • (2) complete the work in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. Moreover, if Grantee is the Working Party, Grantee shall not allow any liens to be filed against the Servient Estate arising out of or related to the work in question, and if such a lien is nonetheless filed against the Servient Estate, Grantee shall, at Grantee's sole expense, post a bond in accordance with the terms of RCN 60.04.161 so as to remove the lien from the Servient Estate. If the utility • • work in question will damage any of the Road Work improvements, the 111 Working Party shall, promptly after completion of the work in 1366/053:3122616 -3- EASON14 wu auirafi OAMdFSr . i f'2,: _' • ,1 ..'T t• j j r question and at the Working Party's sole expense, repair and replace the Road Work improvements to the condition they were in prior to the commencement of the work in question. 5.2 Grantor, at Grantor's expense, shall at all times be entitled to tap into or otherwise connect to any utility system1 . installed by Grantee' or for the benefit of the Dominant Estate • without paying any latecomer's charge, hook-up fee or other reimbursement payment, provided that (1) Grantor does not over1:_1. 1-1 he utility system in question or materi:._' 3 diminish its service to Grantee and (2) any maintenance expenses incurred in connection with any shared utility system shall be split between • Grantor and Grantee in proportion to their respective amounts of usage of the system in question (however, if the maintenance work is required due to the negligence or intentional misconduct of either party, that party shall bear all repair expenses and if the • maintenance is required at a point in the utility line in question , that no longer serves one of the parties, the party not served shall not be required to participate in the repair or maintenance expenses) . Moreover, Grantor shall be entitled to require Grantee i • to increase the capacity of one, some or all of the utility systems • :..1 being installed by Grantee to accommodate Grantor's use, provided Zthat (a) Grantor pays for all additional expenses relating to such , .i oversizing and (b) Grantor advises Grantee of its election to oversize a given utility system prior to the commencement by' • Grantee of the installation of such system (in other words, once • the system has been installed, Grantor shall no longer have the • sright to require oversizing) . k UECTION 6 L_MAINTENANCE OF ROAD WORE IMPROVEMENTS I • 6.1 The Road Work improvements shall be maintained by the • parties in a good, safe, clean and presentable condition and all costs incurred in such maintenance shall be split between the parties on a pro rata basis based on the ratio of the total floor I area in all buildings located on a party's parcel to the total - ' floor area in all buildings located on both the Dominant Eststn and • the Servient Estate. Until such time as a building is located on the Servient Estate, Grantee, at Grantee's expense, shall have the ' f • right to undertakk any required maintenance work without any notice to or consent f.om Grantor. After a building is located on the • Servient Estate, either party shall have tha right to undertake any required maintenance work, but no party shall do so without first advising the other party of the -work in question, the proposed timing for such work, the proposed contractor or contractors who . • will perform the work and the estimated cost thereof. If the other party reasonably objects to the proposed timing, 'cost (including • allocation thereof -- ace Section 6.2 below) or contractor or the need for the maintenance work in question, the parties shall I endeavor in good faith to settle their differences before the work ! is commenced, and if they are unable to do so, they will implement 1366/O53:3/7A% -i / - u1tIUT4 L. . , , RWltALIIP tiELL/FARCE ST t. I . • procedure described below in Section 6.< to i thedetermine arbitration P in question is reasonable. If the that the objection is reasonable, it shalom determine whether the objection ;.e.g. , it ma'1 enternrther determinesappropriate order under the circumstancesa in bidng commencement of the wo , achange in order bidding, a delay in the cow of costs pursuant contractor, he e a disproportionate sharoirn it may order that the work terms of Sectiondone at all) . . need not be 6.2 Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, any maintenance work required by the negligence n or intant , ention or inviteuc es st of a l party, or a party's employees, be paid for solely by such party. 6.3 With regard to maintenance work done in accordance instigating party Bill thev terms otherons .2 for i above,r 6.1 s of share the complecost tion such work f such work . nvoine the party days after comp withinn one hundred eighty (180) such invoices shall be and, if the party being invoiced is Grantor, from the accompanied by a full lien release general contractor who tion The invoiced party shall _n was responsible for the work in question. within fifteen (15) x pay its pro rats share of the cost c implies with the terms of the 1 r4 days after the instigating Party If the invoiced party fails to • ') immediately preceding sentence- lied, the sum in question r make such payment within such 15 day pe rate of shall begin to accrue interest at the r e of the prime Firstf at the time in questionr ensue, from al Nton a chargedplus five percent (5%) pe In Nathtional,end of such Bain dayBra period through the date of payment. add io 15 day the invoicing party, . addition, any such claim for reimbursement by together with the above-described interest, shall be a secured right and a lien shall attach and take effect upon recordation ofthe invoicing party in the the below-described claim of lien by i King County Recorder's Office. The claim of lien shall ainclude the • following: (i) the name of the claimant; (ii)the last ]newt concerning the basis of the claim of the lien; (iii) known name and address of the owner or reputed owner of the parcel (iv) a description �f real against which the lien is claimed; Cred; a on descriptionfthe ofl .property against which the �ses claioe has given rise to the the work performed or paymenta statement itemizing the amount claim of lien hereunder tatment that the lien is claimed pursuant to thereof; and ( Agreement reciting the recordation number of fathis the terms of this Aqr acknowledged m the Agreement.' The claim of thatlia copy thereofhas been serveL upon containwr a certificatehom either by personal service owner against whom the. lien is claimed, either mail sent from 1�n9 or by mailing to such owner by n. The lien so claimed shall attach from the date o rey, Washingto t claimed thereby and it may be of recordation by on suit,t under n the ater f sale (which power is hereby enfo granted), by poweranyother manner allowed by granted), judicial foreclosure or in r�sosta -s- t0wfsr n1 /"1 _• . L 1 _ law for the foreclosure of liens. Any exercise of the power of .(.' sale or foreclosure shall be conducted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington applicable to the exercise of powers of sale in or foreclosures of mortgages and deeds of trust. If • appropriate, the invoicing party is hereby appointed the trustee • for purposes of exercising such power of sale, with full right of substitution. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such liens shall be subordinate to any mortgage or deed of trust given in good faith and for value now or hereafter encumbering the property subjected • t^ '..he lien, provided such mortgage or deed o' t.7.-”rt was recorded prior to the recording of the lien, and any purchaser at any foreclosure or trustee's sale (as well as any grantee by deed in lieu of foreclosure or trustee's sale) under any prior mortgage or . deed of trust shall take free and clear from any such then existing • lien, but otherwise subject to the provisions of this Agreement. 6.4 If the parties are unable to resolve their differences as to an issue arising out of Sections 5.2, 6.1 or 6.2, the dispute shall be resolved by single-arbitrator arbitration before the ;,.n American Arbitration Association under the Commercial Arbitration Rules modified as follows: (i) the total time from date of demand x' for arbitration to final award shall not exceed thirty (30) days; C. (ii) the Arbitrator shall be chosen by the American Arbitration c4 Association without submittal of lists and subject to challenge r/- only for good cause shown; (iii) all notices may be by telephone or O other electronic communication with later confirmation in writing; CI (iv) the time, date and place of the hearing shall be sat by thc Arbitrator in his or her sole discretion, provided that there shall be at least five (5) days prior notice of the hearing; (v) there - shall be no post-hearing briefs; (vi) there shall be no discovery except by order of the Arbitrator; and (vii) the Arbitrator snall iesue nis or her award within seven (7) days after the clone of the hearing. Any of the above provisions may be modified by stipulation of the parties. The decision of the Arbitrator shall be final and non-appealable and enforceable in any coui' of competent jurisdiction. The partied hereby release the Arbitrator from any and all claims or possi'.le claims against the ?sbitritor based on the decision of the Arbitrator. The prevailing part../ .n the proceeding shall be ...warded reasonable attorneys' fees, expert and non-expe:•+. witness costs and expenses, and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with the arbitration, unless the Arbitrator for good cause determines otherwise. The costs and fees • of the Arbitrator shall be born by the non-prevailing party, unless the Arbitrator for good cause determines otherwise. paCTlo$ 7: CRO88-INN:MlITT Each party to this Agreement hereby agrees to indemnify and • hold the other party harmless from and against any and all claims, damages; liabilities and expenses (including attorneys' fees incurred with or without litigation or on appeal) arising out of or 1366/053:3/211/96 -,- EAX T4 ommuPOELL/FM SI • IMMO ' r - } t Property by the in any way related to the use of the Eaten Pr a invitees. its employees, tenants, g iiniitees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the claims, d >s, liaLilit es and expenses so arising are caused by the concurrent both parties, their employees, tenants, agents or invitees shalleach , indemnify the other only to ' the extent of the party party's own negligence or that of its agents, tenants, indemnifying pn Y oin indemnity is specifically and employees or invitees. The foregoing rt ,s immunity expressly intended to constitute a waiver toof a the edaparxtent necessary toy underpri Industrial Insuranceifiedp rTitlevitRa complete indemnity for the egige the indemnified fyiny rt 's employees, to the extent of negligence of the indemnifying path Y subject of specific negotiation their negligence, and has been the subj • between the parties. Notwithstanding the joint and several liability language vis a vis HCWA, as outlined in Section 4.2 above, any claims made by HCWA under the Section 4.2 indemnity shall be allocated between Grantor and Grantee in accordance with the terms of this Section 7. .OD 'algalgig-21--Uallg5211521""ignill r) Grantor hereby reserves the right to use the Easement Property • c4 however it wishes (including the right to construct improvements ccl on, under and above the Easement Property) provided such use does not materially or unreasonably interfere with Grantee's ror abovve- T . granted rights under the.Easements. In addition, notb reserves all other rights in and to the Easement Property • specifically granted to Grantee herein. x rT7ex 2BIIa anta f mYl'f 7186IOlE ' All of the terms and" conditions of this Agreement shall rein with the land and shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the successors and assigns, personal representatives and heirs of the parties hereto including without limitation all ' subsequent owners ofthrough Dominant r them Servient Estates and all persons claiming firar/QP-111---laliCIRIBMCI 10.1 If eithf party to this Agreement consults an attorney in order to erforct. y v' : the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement by the non-prevailing party of the prevailing party's reasonably costs and attorneys' fees, whether such costs and attorneys' fees are incurred wi'-h or without litigation or on appeal (to the extent inconsistent with • the foregoing, the terms of Section 6.4 shall govern over the foregoing with regard to the arbitration procedure described in Section 6.4). • • Ill tAf9etT< -7- PAICALVIVIELLfAlsEfT • • . __ . • • • 10.2 This event ' parties with xrq re constitutes ass relying on anyPeet to the grease the entire a Party or the oral or written re rat Property. Neither of the ai4 other party Principals, agents, employees wade b affiliates party e in this A arty n l ess such representateiioon o s a or seedntheit °der • agreements between This Agreement su is expressed in �rri ri the par'tieThis sgre�ent may be amendthe ed onlypertaining to y a ►ritirgi elersedes any ment Property,n 10.3g signed by both No claim o to any provision of waiver, consent party y unless suchf this Agreement shal acquiescence with respect acquiescedtunless in writing. rts a as expressly be ived aconsen either quiescence shall not apply latter event, the waiver, rated or 10.4• Y future action consent ..' ' between This Agreement the or inaction- .;- bet eon an yd input js from both parties It of air rntial Con T the Pair Agreement and their rea nag°tiations intent o shall be cons pective counsel. not for or t the language containedthere in acco • .y mechanical against herein rdatice with ..� function of draaftiY, thisreg A le a of as a whole, and �� 10.5drafting Agreement• who performed the party may If either Party defaults . or tear exercise anor all rightsunder this Agreement, e or in parties including the right tosue remediesp available °ther .7) Both s party haveacknowledge and a for specificat law for specific available to it as a.agree that it is necessary performance. • I remedies, each performance. However, beforel remedy them that each the defaultparty shall However, exercisingright to sue and five give the other.party written lights or thirty �3 and idays (5) business monetary to days to cU1e notice of • 1 t defaulting nsonebnon-monetary detault perta monetary default cure d, theeed thata ng party shall be cured wipers of a non- , riod and is thereafter the cure is have a longer Period o t�' day the ismonetaryrdiligently pursue@ to cmenced ompletion) .etion) 30thin ths day T vent default at of expense ofa non-monetary default ) In t*.. the non-defaultingaton party non-defaulting part event agree obligation, Y (the that is cured expense ion, the re non-mc netry defau ahall latseofftehe the, but ty ies hereby the ot cured within t`.e required time if shall have frame) defaultinge other Partin}' at the extent the a jo rights outlined ), the nondefaultingy apais e f this Section 10.a5�are in Section 6.3 (to the inconsistent with the • • • • 1366/O53:3/Za/% MUCw/P4FlVfAI EST LAMM • Ni '1 R' - ,3• .Rr, _ .'tea �, r. ' r•�_�.,.�umt- y•;2I .~�`' " w:'�" ��� ' � �` r - _ • • • • • • • terms of Section 6 above, the terms of Section 6 s&.�l?. govern wi1L respect to the matters dealt with in Section 6). - EsMIME* aPoWiLL-ORI Washington A ASSOCIATES, 1Rtfs8S STssL CORPORATION, paw al. O rel... corporation, • By:1 .C� Its: C;ti.,c.rh,C /��r,.�.� Its: U. ! . . C) • • iimaiuncawFAINEST 4 .• .� ^f-` �':K Imo':.... OMWMGC • • 1j ; • • r STATE Or WASHINGTON ) ) ss. . COUNTY OF KING ) • I On this e2 8 day of , 1996, before ae, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared J , known to as to be the ./l .,,/ of POWELL-ORILLIA ASSOCIATES, the partnership that executed the fr-egoing instrument,' and ac]mowlydgt? th's Raid 'nstruaent to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, for the ' purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the . person appearing before as and caking this acknowledgment is the person whose true signature appears on this document. j WITNESS ay hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate above written. ' C�v4--fo/kel�L1.4-,-t-, • mputtr. MIntinn ao NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the Statotof.' ..1 Washington, residing at My commission expires ,3 ,o/ o-7,s ,,,„ % .,�; '.Jf.,.i«ys ..'.' l i ' 1366/C63:3/24/96 -10- LUIEN0T4 _ 5IACM wrAW1 •'�,£�+l �!'•- irq ��:.. .«.f;s.,• t-e:i /�s,2I . , r..�'. .y •... .... #tit - .. .".. .Iy. .. . ass. . alll • i STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this 28 day of --r , 1996, before se, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, • duly commissioned and sworn personally appearedrrr ELT-' known to se to be the //.L11 ��,a.-/-e_y - 1 of FARWEST STEEL CORPORATION, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be • the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she vas I authorized to execute said instrument. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the • person appearing before se and caking this acknowledgment is the . person whose true signature appears on this document. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate above writ�teen., Q • �7 sl..rar+ } moo/ I. �F4/ k x, Print Naas CnCl NOTARY PUBLIC in and for a State of C.) Washington, residing at i My commission expires ./ie 7 • . T L i '.z d :l.';D.V .•g Uo�d' I • MOMS 3a1/96 -11- EAfafTI .MCXyEp1E11/..e6T — r - + - • , .•••, / •. • -c r ' i EXHIBIT A THE EASEMENT AREA_IS DESCRIBED AS 'A PORTION OF LOT 7 ACCORDING • TO THE BURUNGTON NORTHERN BINDING SITE PLAN AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 161 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 8 THROUGH 11. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 1, COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7, T:VENCE CO 'T7.1 87'50'47' EACV ALONG THE NORTH UNE THEREOF 268.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 87'50'47" EAST 42.37 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46'34'27" WEST 2239 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37'09'39" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 84.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83'44'08"WEST 224.17 FEET TO THE WEST UNE OF SAID LOT 7 AND THE EAST MARGIN OF UND AVENUE;THENCE NORTH 02'09'37'EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 30.33 FEET;THENCE NORTH 83'44'06"EAST 219.73 FEET TO THE BEGINNING ' OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32'59'28"AN ARC DISTANCE OF 67.58 FEET TO THE NORTH UNE OF SAID LOT 7 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. I CONTAINING 9,126 SQUARE FEET OR 0.21 ACRES MORE OR LESS. . I x C) Cs.) E c� E I . .. I I X. i 1 I ' i • ;. •• 4 4 sl I tau 13 • 1—i1ruxru 10111.01:r3 ma..WwuJaua•3 II 'AM Al s3 I Lu •1.0 YovY,r.a OMRkl \ _� rivalry ATUMI OW OW •SK!urUn Al to '+.'' ---- --NMOLL +�� �� S��I I►—` ;. 1 imr lig Sri,.Yip+.R...'- ...--' WM= SLei ••• - • a - _ ow �� i.e- ,}YroGZ ' ..I .,— gyp iT1' CO • 1` 7 j * rt•li • a a Mt— •••• // In.x zwl.ns i I . y ooyl -yw In�ccvn / �1 I.... II-N'Ol hn,w. ./ oN�ruor►n/lovrots IOLLlouo q I j t��+11 /' ,, / ICJ�YAr3U 111 6l VANIm fi ,,.. .J ill , rim!cis,��+�1Ij.�u /�----.�.. /WI WOO FM.11 01t0.1011.1 �• ii rim! 11�1 Glom , - / .',.- I 1TTT - t• // v..., 1 • . . • • • ' • • • . 1 I • . v 'ti.. ' :�,: .. • '"l'' ': '..' ';• ::,- . • , . .. , . ..... . ... . . .. --..-. I . .. . • .i. . • • . .. • • .. . •. • . ' . .. .. • .: • . •• I 1 .. ........ . . .!. 'I'.IN.:1.7•*Sitii•...' •• ..• . . I .... • 4 71" ..) . ' .I , ........0402:, •t CAI 14i .,. . 1-1 CA Xf-a• It • ' . 1 • i I,f.. o .. \ \--2-MM.COMPARED CP3.14 ASPHALT COACKTE.CLASS V' D 'A- s--r um.ccMPAC1LD DOP'M CRUSHED INCOI Lase OR 4 t -MM. D COAPACEED EP114 ASIMALT DILATED DADE .. TYPICAL SECTION ,.. ACCESS DRIVEWAY ON LOT 7 `N. TO FARWEST STEEL 4) NO SCALE ( c6gT6ZC(196 4 •-47, • - 2 . . I.,;•" lb.: . , • . . . . .1 ' . 1 .4 • ‹: ..- l'A.. • • 1 1 I ' ' . .,. . .,... .. 4 • • . . •• .... • • • • "...010+ i. I :.• Whcn rwoded return to • ' R,,ha C MacAulay.Esy Alston.Cruruuge.MacAulay ai I'ru.tur 1,1.1' \ I UM Sct:und Awilue.Suite 390n • rill, g Svatlie,WA 98104-IO4S l , ` ' • INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMEir � v 1 ' This Indemnification Agreement ("Agreement") is made effective § as of the 28th day of May, 1996 by and between POWELL-ORILLIA $ ASSCCIATEZ, a Washington general partnership ("POA") , and FARWEBT = STEEL CORPORATION,. an Oregon corporation ("FSC") (individually, an " "Indemnitor" and collectively "Indemnitors") , on.the one hand, .and , HCWA REALTY CORP. , a Washington , corporation ("HCWA" or "Indemnitee") , on the other hand. Indemnitors and.Indemnitee agree to all of 'the following terms and conditions, including the - recitals.. 9; SECTION 1: RECITALS. R . 1.1 The Indemnitors entered into an Easement Agreement in March, 1996, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A ("Easement Agreement") , under which Easement Agreement POA grants an easement to FSC over that certain real property (the "Servient Estate") described as follows: 8 • "Lot 7, Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, ' according to City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded , June 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 8 through 11, inclusive, under King County Recording No. 9206302696. " tl) which easement ("Easement") is for the benefit of the land owned by • FSC (the "Domina'nt Estate") described as fn?lows: O• "Lot B. Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, . C7 according to the City of Renton Binding Site Plan • 4 C) recorded June 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 8 1 . p. through 11, inclusive, under King County Recording No. 9206302696; and • Parcel A of Short Plat No. 378-79, according to short plat‘ recorded under King County Recording No. • 7909249001. " 1.2 The Easement Agreement runs with the land and grantb certain indemnities to HCWA '•>nder Section 4 .2 of the Easement Agreement coverin'' certain cl .ims, damages, liability, losses and • expenses arising out of or in any way related to any damage through i interference with the functioning of an existing underground storm } water retention out fall pipe ("Pipe") installed by HCWA across the Ir Servient Estate for the benefit of that certain real property (the "Benefited Estate") owned by HCWA currently and described as . i • follows: • "Lot 2, Burlington Northern, a binding site plan, according to ti.a City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded June 30, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages 8 • Page 1--INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT F72 .as . ..n qi:: .. • thr-ugh 11, inclusiv.?, under King County Record:ng ham'. 32U6302696. " 1.3 As HCWA wants its indemnity righ .s ur,ler Section 4 .2 of the Easement' Agreement set forth in a separate indemnification agreement and the Indemnitors are willing to set . forth such agreement, the parties are entering into this Indemnification Agreement to reflect the terms and •conditions of such . Indemnification Agreement. I SECTION 2: GRANT OF INDEMNIFICATION RIGHTS. 2.-1 The Indemnitors, hereby jointly and severally agree to t • indemnify and hold HCWA harmless from and against any and all. claims, damages, liabilities, losses and expenses (including attorneys' fees incurred with or without litigation or on appeal) arising out of or in any way related to any damage to or interference with the functioning of the "Pipe" caused by the Road • Work, use of the road or any utility installation or maintenance work undertaken by on or behalf of either Indemnitor. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Road Work" shall have the meaning given it in the Easement Agreement. 2.2 The indemnity granted in this Agreement shall be :z perpetual in duration. Further, all the terms and conditions of • m this Agreement shall run with the land and shall inure to the . ' , ,cn benefit of, be binding upon, the successors and assigns, personal Q representatives and heirs of the parties hereto, including without C'') limitation all subsequent owners of the Benefited, Dominant and 0 Servient Estates and all persons claiming through or ender them. iN - SECTION 3. MISCELLANEOUS. . W `I 3.1 If either party to this Agreement consults an attorney in order to enforce any of the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement by the non-prevailing party of the prevailing party's reasonable costs and attorneys' fees, whether such costs and attorneys' fees are incurred with or without litigation or on appeal. ' 3.2 Except for the Easement Agreement, this Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the indemnification rights Of CWA. Neither party is relying on any oral or written representation made by the other party or the / , principals, agents, employees or affiliates of the other party: unless such representation is expressed in writing in this Agreement. Except for the Easement Agreement, this Agreement supersedes any prior written agreements between the parties pertaining to such indemnification rl •hts. This Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by both parties. Nothing . contained herein shall affect an Indemnitor's rights to seek Page 2--INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT 1 • Oil j payment reimbur^4_ment or contribution from the other Indemr.iti : . under tha pr ,:event Agreement. 3.3 No claim of waiver, consent or acquiesce: c:e vith reupect to any provision of this Agreement shall be made against either . party unless such party has' expressly waived, consented or acquiesced in writing. In such latter event, the waiver, consent or acquiercencct shall not apply to any future action or inaction. 3.4 Any demand, or notice given under or in connection with this Agreement shall be in writing and served either personally or sent by registered or certified sail, postage prepaid, addressed as . . • follows: To: FSC Farwest Steel Corporation Attn: David Forester P.O. Box 889 Eugene, OR 97440 • With a copy to: Robert A. Stout Hershner, Hunter, Andrews, • • Neill & Smith, LLP .• P.O. Box 1475 • Eugene, OR 97440 2 1 . r (D To POA: Powell-Orillia Associates 1 p) Attn: Peter Powell I C) 737 Market Street T� Kirkland, WA 98033 • ) S C' With a copy to: Robert MacAulay GAlston, Courtnage, CD MacAulay & Proctor, LLP • 1000 2nd Avenue, Suite 3900 1 Seattle, WA 98104-1045 i t To HCWA: HCWA Realty Corp. c/o Home Base ` 3345 Michelson i . Irvine, CA 92715 f Attn: Vice President, Real Estateli [ With a copy to: . Waban Inc. One Mercer Road Natick, MA 01760 r Attn: Vice President - General i 6 Coui.3el • [:. Page 3--INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT ' ff. Or to suc► other address as the parties may dia-ectmail:-r', the demand or notice shall be deemed deliver n wT its 2 • If :ftai it 1a placed in the mail. d S wO � ) .inys i A IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this greement as of the date above written. pONELL-JK+j.LZA 11880C2]►?E8, a Washin on general !ARREST CORPORATION, partnership an Oregon corporation By Its: arrt By• 4- — Its: ECRA REALTY CORP. , a Washington corporation By: � ; �- Its: u onze I BY 1 Its: • d I z i f i i f i I f 'age 4--INDEMEIFICATION AGREE • • STATE OF WAS+':NGTon ) _ COr�.'TY u? ZING ) ss. • On this '7 day of May, 1996, before MR, - • Notary Public in—and for the State of Washington, ul�commi commis •sioned ` to and se sworn personally appeared - . .•- RILLIA ASSOCIATES, the 4 , known and acknowledged the said instrumenner p at t te tobe of � �-Oument e foregoing instrument, act and deed of said ;partnership, the freethe u and voluntary mentioned, and on oath stated that hshe was authorizedeto etxherein said instrument. utw • I Certify that I' know or have satisfactory person 'appearing before me and making this acknnowledgementhis the person ,whose true signature appears on this document. • WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed theand /ear in, the certificate above written. day • • • • mouoipuem LANCE TISC► HEp A°PI O""'^"'rEa JTat io.iva1 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of • ashin , re.iding at My come ss on exp res • • II • • • • ► S--INDEMNIF:CATION AGREEMENT • coro4oswE LTli or MassacsusTrrs ) ss. Y OF MIDDLESEX ) ?wat • On this t day of Ney, 1996, before ae., the undersigned, a Notary Public in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts , duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared known to me to be e�� A j. tha corporation execu ed the 9i gm' ef�Strument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing before me and making this acknowledgement is the person whose true signature appears on this document. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate above written. CD NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the cos„onwe th Of a ach sett 4444,�,�,�j residing atVaf2 My coo, i>ts o expire URIC f. RrLn rramry Public mri3 egminewreiVreslinaixt 30. 1999 O i N ' ► c) , • • Page 6--INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT • • f !IS. ST7rE OF OREGON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LANE ) • I- . r, On this oi-W day of May, 1996, before me, the undersigned, a 1 - Notary Publicinand for the Stat of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared la�y i Pr. Fprrs•r , known to me to be the /{eG `Qr?Sid of FARWEST STEEL CORPORATION, the corporation ttthhhat executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the purpores i therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorize," execute said instrument. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that the person appearing before me and making this acknowledgement is the iperson whose true signature appears on this document. F WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in the certificate above written. t �' OFFIGAL SEAL 3prr+ 7 AIM' WEAVER NcrrMY trpyM13510�/plplq�itAY p,17Yo r R C.) NOTARY UBLIC in and for the State jostlyf �O o`,i��,, residing at l � My o sa n mires �-9•y/ • O �' c :! Page 7-.-INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT s •. • , • ••••y.�r ae afrVAe Tv .�^T.l r i4t>aT . . • ua, 4A. 18077 Jl .(ram'; • �IrL . ." Shia L Agreement + _ t,.;'='•r o=''14se11. Ilse by rvld bsty L7 is anal' �a this • dad tL- .rr �;�1� �� � J 71dI00S'J CS, 1 i .•: general partnerahl`lp '■Or..rtars) e d runs? t' EL) '' �`'. brut*: aw O«a,.�y • oorpor: t;n, :■9tmnt.a-) Grantor and acmes to [11 of the following tarps and conditions, M 1 • :, inoludiaq the recitals. I. i •' I = 1T =sctr {I SI • 1.1 Grantor coat that certain real " ' tstntee) described as follows: ProWrtY ( e sarvi•nt s j I •. Lot '7, Burlington Northam, • binding site plan, a 1 ` ;� according to city of Ronton Binding Bite Plan racerd.d i 1 } C1 June 30, 1992 in Voltiaa 161 of Plats, Pages 6 through 11 •� inclusive, under Xing County Recording No. 9206702696.E 01 i .' ! Grantee owns that certain real property (the •rumit a 1.2 nan( :State") deaoribed as follows! I •. • Lo m c t B Burlington Northern, a binding site plan �O according to City of Manton Binding site Plan recorded 1 - Jun. 30, 1992 in Vol.. 161 of Plate, page, 6 through 11, inclusive, under King County Raoording Mo. 9206302696; and • Parcal•A of.Short Plat No. 37s-79, a000rdin9 to the short . plat recorded under Xing County Recording No. 7909219001; I I • 1.3 Attached hereto as jrhibit A is a description of what• snail hereinafter be referred to as the •sasaeant•property", . 211a i Basement Property 1s a portion of thm Servient tat.t.. Attached 1- 7 Property • hereto as rrhibit A-1 is • droving shoring the Basement P O with croaahatcbinq. • . - •1.4 Grantee viah.s to have a000es over. and certain utility C rights under the Basement Property. •Grantor. i+ Pilling to grant' A furh.rights to Grantee on the terse and conditions contained In • • • 1 I. - this Agreement. OSLQTIox 21 ait12R Orn 2.1 sub mot to the rther terms end conditions outlined In .this Agrsasan ,.Crantor hereby grants to Grantse a noh-uxcjueiv. i eaasaent over and under the iaa want Property for purposes of (1) I obtaining pedestrian and/or vehicular ingress to and egress from the Dominant rat.t. end (2) from times to tiee installing and maintaining in the subsurface of the Basement property storm •rya', ummalanam4 .1. FLED uu uir.ac a EXCISE 7AX NOT REOtL �ATkhoy IOr71�E thT0�11bvU+cE u c..,nma trwer 372 NM AVE Ni • k �"'1 rYA T /G BOAC 1A7 SCLLLYUL WA MCP 4 • • • • • • • Tralessoiss 6 .• _ _ Page 1_of • —__•___ . • , • . % I . . • . . . • . - • ' , _. • '17)-444,),...•••,e',. .. . .... ............ • . .....\ -A-r• .vit:.•:':-,;- ' • • • . . • . : ii.&.).itl 2__,. ..-••'''•." . 'VW-a-sanatory ftirlY: electrical, gas, telaphons, cable and other It_...14y, :'• . • :. :•••mystams sarvin6 the' Coeincnt trite. Ouch alin io ement rlitz sh...11 . • . •......,te ilareinafter be oollect4vely reforrad to as the 'teas...or-'-.i,• % ,, . - • • ' '' . . . :.1. j,I...... -• .. ' “.....X.:' '•.• 2.2 Grantor reprasentsendtarrant. that Grant or lathe wner. . • .:-.1:4;of tb• sal-vie:It setste. and has the righl-. to grant the Lasrma-14. that, subject to the terml of th: s airoessnt, grantee has the . • •,....ii.:1•Aright.to quietly enjoy the dasasents. .-. • • . • e.,-:il - • : • • dm-rroltil worlov CY laglamtms . . , . .•;,.et..7.:. - ...' ,::. Tbd tasiments•graotod in this agreement shall be perpetual in A • :?..leatrition. ': ,-. . i; • •‘... - 1. • -:-:•paRritet 41 SOWNTIOCTIc. or 210A2 • I' a : ..!7 * ..4.1 In consideration for the above grant of the Remanent., P • ..i ' • • :Grantss hareby egress that it will oammanoe on or befoze that eny 1 . ....:1,2-vhich'is ninety (90) days attar receipt of therequisitd.building . I 1 , .-;parait(a) or ranoval of the requiredeurobarge, whichevar is latst.' • ' : end oomplsts (suldsct to fora* majeure delays beyond Grantmele .,i.v.reasonabla control) on or before that date which is one (1) year . - • altar tho commencesent data, at Grantee'. sole expens., the road,improvezents dspictad on rvtihlt_P which is whi is attachedhmrsto and "':jiMoorpoiated herein by this referenoe (such road improvemant work . 1 shall hereiraftar be referred to as the 'Road eork0). Orantoe ..1? shall pursue diligaosnoma.:;t!y andAnlfpih the rosite perli (m)and d iarthe rW : ..1: ork • so as•to yield a ocsomnceisatt date for the Road Work that is as El • close to the data of this Junaessant Cl is reasonably possible. . R •:- Grantas shalloauss the Road Work to be completed in a good and • • i ' X %, workmanlike mannar in accordanos with all applicable laws and ' • ...regulations and without undue delay once the Road work his coommnoed. In additiom crantaa acir.adi to )umipthe fervient rotate 1. i • f . i • frog of any liens arising out of or related to the Road work and , CI • • ' if • lien is nonethelass riled against the aervient Estate arising ' D 1 1 C • '. out of. or relating to the Road Work, Grantee agrees to promptly .•e) . • ' post a band at Grantee's expanse in accordance with the term. of • C1 ' RCW 60.04.141, as the salad rarbe amended( so as to release the ) dorvient tatate fro. such lien. before signing'any construction ro -. contracts for all or any portion of the Road Wo: :, Grantee shall CD .. submit tn. nerve of the proposed contractor or contractors to . 1 . r, • Grantor, together with copies of the proposed construction 1 • oontraot(s) and sohodule(s), all of which shall be subject to the CD • . review and approval of Grantor, Which approval shall not be • . unreasonably withheld or delayed.. :1 _ . . , . . . • 4..2 NW. Realty Carp,•a Washington corporation (aNCWA•ris ' II 114 . . :' • :. the currant owner of Lot 2, .Burlington Northern, a binding mita plan, s000rding to City of Renton Binding Site Plan recorded June . • .. . , • . " ? IC, 1992 in Volume 161 of Plats, Pages a 'through 11, inclusive, Is • . • .. . . , . • . -. :! Ineialarral4 .1- Wing . . apotawraau.s MOW . .• ' I . . . . . •. •' . . 1 . . . . . . . . . ' . • . . . . • . . . . ... . . • • .. . ' • , • • • • . • . . . . . I • , . . . I . . . ' . • . a • - . . . , . • • . . .. . - fritt ' • . -, • •• :; . . i....._,, ' . . •.' _. _.•(:_:t • ri - ...1 •••.: .- ga . • I.:. •• EXHIBIT 1 -. . • 1111 111"17111---- '- IL-cw-I-L7Adjk .. • • • • n • • ender Xing.rty.Record:. An. !=C+iSo]696. A under Xing in l Yhl portion o� the road _:.:stcrr water rat ntii�tfall pipe iasta:l.1 by4 *oar ECKr�g r ,tee and -:. Grantor hereby jointly and severallya e Grantee and 'lICiT11 and its sacoessors, assigns, tg, to lades/lily and Arid Landau' from and against a 6 T'"ts` damages and imritaas 1 losses and • g ny and all. c•:se, dana�ges lidbilitiae, menses (including_attorra e. fees incurred with or a without litigation or on appeal) wising out of or in • :.-related to any damage to or iatarfer'anat with the functioning of • aim pipe canoed by the Road York, we of the road or any utility installation or maintenance work undertaken by on or on behalf of Cram or Granter. Ortntar and Grantee 1, ereby• • . ''given tufficient oonsideratian for this t and that !ICU has rely on this indemnity even 4h 7 and that 8CSt71 may ,Agreement. Y thou it is eat a parts •to thin I!CSIcI St D ILSTIZI • installed Evtir the lasaaeat p ided in 6aotion 5.2, any utilities • Dominant'Zetate shall be Installed the or rty f �fof of the and shall be aaiatitaed in a good aooditioa at the e of Grant,, f :.4 grants.. similarly, of course, if Creator elects to.ins�tall anse ny ...ntilities,under (or above) th. Easement Property, ouch shall be V! lastalled and aaintaiaed in a o sole • f: expense. Prior to commencing angood util tytinnstallationion at tor�repalr ,y•,..work and prior to Grantor connecting to any utility systsa initali.d by Grants. pursuant to section 5.2, too parlors the installation, repair or commotion work party + wishing nattaz- ,.ps;•referrad to as the 'Working Party) shall 1 • •to • party- with a written description of the• vrk provide n the etior . . • tn.". (inolUding; but • not limited to, information• ccrdian • • r;.'s location/layout,, siting and invart), as well as the proposed os4dstine : fram/s within .high the work vill'bt done and (2) ue reiasonobl� • • •�.•.: good 'faith of cza to acooacodate reasonable timing revisions • ' .propoe..d by t other patty (the Working Party shall agree to • conduct the work in question attar normal bosinaaa hours if•.tbt work Will notarially interfare with either aooess or tbs.provision •. • Q ..of utility service, to the other ('� the'1lozkinq Part shall PertY�s parcel). In ,1 avant,, • Y (1) take reasonablwetepe to mini/di/pony. •:" disruption to the other party caused by the work in question and • j\ • • (2) complete the work in a good and vorkmanlika canner and in • CDaccordanC. with all epPlicabla yews mad r gulations. xotsovar, if ! . .. .... Grantee is the Working Party, Grantee shell not alloy any liens to . be filed against the Servimit Estate arising out of or related to .) .the votx in question, end if such • lien is nonetheless filed • igainat the aervient Istate, Grant** shall at Grantee's sole'',.'.ttpens•i post a bond in a000rdano. with the tares of Xcw 60.04.141 • so is to remove the lien trot the 6aryi.nt Estate. If the utility work in question will damage any of the Road Work isprov.santa, the • Working Party sb-ll, promptly after completion of the work in , r.06.mthuun+ 3. • • j • I. II• • • • t . I • . , i • rI • :� ice:•_ .� • I y�` 7 :I; • •-r A:tr.= EXHIBIT . .:;e•''y+,. 1.' t te 4 •, Page Hof•41'7 .. i �. -- —_...1 r and zweesragilleM4In :. .__...__._..,�__' . • ■.. ...'.� _.r. •; . •utirKnansan�sAe�nr+raeea'�a�s�t • • I . .• quea ' and at tee Working pa_ty'a to can1en13 t i�c i t nay vxa is laps the Road work isrprov ants to ,'�%' s+r� sti--. •= I ,. prior to the 000aeroo.ant,ot tie work in Qua � . ;r • .' i:7 Grantor, at Grantor's caponK ^�l a autility es. he sotti�sd to tap into of otherwise czar any ' installed by Grant's or for the bertatlt of the Dominant fits , 1 an ;late omer's daarga. boon-up Lee or •vthar :•a without pal y d .t provided that V.) os ca■ ant •Yecasath pty�t , ) ar*rt D "location c • ratariall listrinb • ..`o�ntdsr, the utility system in qmc ice to Grant .:•,;• • • • its Is *. Gad (2) sir maintenance axparaas red in • "‘Connegtion with any shared utility systas shall be split between 'Grantor and Crsntse in proportion to thiir rsspeativs amounts of wage of the system in gosstioa (tovev+sr, if the �* worst . is required dun to the segligenoe or. intentional ai if tof ; either party, that party shall tsar all repair expana ta and aaiataranoe Is required at a point in the utility lips in question that no longer serve one of the parties, the Dry not served •shall not be raquirad to Darticipsta in the repair, or maintananoa expanses). Moreover, Grantor shall be entitled to require Grants* .to increase the capacity of one, some or all of the utility systems . DI beinq•inatalled by Grants* to soccamodate Grantor's usa, provided that (a) Grantor pays for all additional .menses relating to auah ' oversixing and (b) Grantor advises Grantee of its election to • C) oversise a given utility system prior to the ooesencm*nt by Grant...of the installation of swab systema (in other words; once ' . ' o the states has been installed, Grantor shall no longer have the • co right to require over■izinq). • of /11012011 at ICAzxi5WAXCi or Rd1D WORK Irmo—zr,:tnTK. • 6.1 711a Road work ieprovenanto shall ba aaintaSned by the ! parties in a good, safe, clean and presantabls condition and all i coati incurred in' such .saintwt&noe shall be split between the pestles on a pro rota basis bused on .the ra.io o t�tal floor ') •area it all buildings located on a party pa floor area in all building■ located oa both the-Ominaat !atat* and the sarvient istat*: Until each tins as a building is located on • tba ®srviant istate, Grants*, at Grantaa!s expanse, shall have the ` j 7 . right to undertake any required ssintenanoe work without nay notice • : D to or oonsant from Grantor. After a building is locatad•on the r a : iarvient Zutate, either party shall have the right to andertaka any ' ; ) required saintananc• work, but no party shall do so.:i•hout first • .advising the other party of the work in question, tetra .proposed timing for-such work, the proposed contractor ar oontractore trio e will perform the work and the estimated cost thereof. If t'ha othry ! • party reasonably objects,to the proposed timing, coat (including ; •, allocation thereof -- aea Section' 6.2 ►elow) or contract.,or or the' I need for the na:intanaaos work in quaation, the partial shall endeavor in good faith to settle their diffarances before the work • _ ;;• is ooaaanoed, and if they are unable to do so, they will iaplasent • I• �•I .-4: .. -'::. . .... . : ..•W•niCu _ • .-7.;.:::.. .. r,. • rid:.: • - f:. DCHIB ry_At rall7,A LI Pa2e oil • • • CP prbo.dure describe.: below in rection 6.4 to Lire arbitration ' •de*arnine whether the objection in question is reasonable. If the •u .atrator determines that the objection is reasuo.:ble, it shall enter the appropriate order ender the airavastances (..g.1 it may • or.:ar bidding, s delay in the ooaarswasant of the work, a change •_ ' mat:motor, a disproportionate sharing of coma- pursn.�.rt tc tho term of Section 6.2 below, etc., or it say crd.r ti it the work ;.need net be done at all). • 6.2 letvirs,at.nding the foregoing, however, say maintenance ' �:'rk ragnirsd by the negligence or intentional misconduct 'of a .party, or a party's employees, tenants, agents or invitee., shall • ns paid for solely by such pasty. 6.3 With regard to maintenance Work done in accordance with . • • ':`.the terser .f Sections 5.2 or 6.1 above, the inatigating party shall ••.' invoice the other party for its share of the coat of arch work • • • ,:.within one hundred eighty (110) days after ccipletion of such work . -: and, if the party being invoiced is Grantor, each invoices shall be . L ! .:-'.a000aaanisd by a full lien release firma terra general contractor Who I n -;.was responsible for the work in question. 7te invoiced party shall j .0 •;::psy its pro rata &hers of the coot in question within fifteen (1.S) ' 0.1 •;'..•days attar the instigating party ootmplies with the term of the • ttyy imm ediately preceding sentence. If the invoiced party fells to - :s✓: : �=sake•svcb payment within such 15 day period, the sta in question " . O .'.:shall begin to accrue interest at time rate of the•pries rat. of aj .'interest as charged at the tits in question by .Seattle:Tiret • • •:Yatianal Sank, With .ranch, plus five, percent (St) par areas, ;roe . ,' the and of such 1S day period throogb the date of. payment. In • • '�;•addition, any such•cla.lmi for rsiebursanent by the invoicing,party • • } together with the above-described interest, ■ball be a secured ' right and a lien shall attach and take effect upon recordation of ' . • ' _,'the belrv-described claim of.lien by the invoicing party in the' •• :•Yinq County Recorder'■ office. The claim of lien shall include the .":-following: (1) the name of the claimant: (ii) .a statement . , : conoerninq,the basis of the clap of the lien: (iii) the last known'• •• •. • • Haas and address of the 'owner or reputed owner of the.parcel • • , 'against which .the lien la claimed; (iv) a description o; the reel • ' • •proparty against which the lien is claimed; (v) a deacription•of • . • .` the work performed. or payment made which has given rim. to the : .• oleis of lien hereunder and .a statement itaaiting the a.,ocnt .r•: thereof; end (vi) a statement that the lien is claimed pursuant to •• • • ''' the terms of this Jkgreesent reciting the recordation number of this ' . • .agreement. The claim of lien shall be duly acknowledged and shall . . ' contain a certificate that a copy thereof ban :,ran served upon the . owner against whom the lien is claimed, aithc: by personal service • •'• or by sailing to such owner by certified tall sent from Ting . . ' Oounty; sraehington.• The lien so claimed shall attach from the date • • . of recordation solely in the amount clainad thereby amid it.nay be • enforced -by snit, under power of sale (which power is hereby , granted), judicial f..raclosure or in any other tanner allowed by ux.,anAmmnt •s• MOM I . NAM • j; • . . • • • .F • . !D JL - i• • • . ExHIBrT r _. > •�• Psi �� • • '*lkw for the foreclosure of liens. Any aneroid* of the povvc of • :"tale or foreolocu m shall be oondnoted is oncosts-Is Y''.h the laws . • ' of the State of Mashingtoo applicable to the axercas. cf r- _Iv as sale in or foracl.o.t:ae of soragagas and deeds of trust.. Ix •� `' appsopriata,.the invoicing party !e ber.0:y aa,ointad this trustsa for sae of axercirinq swab powrs of sale, with full rigtt .-. • i • sabstitution. itoteithstaadinq this tangoing, much liens sb,.11 b. . ▪ eubaxdinata to any mortgage or dead of trust gins in goo: .earth • ' and for value now ar fumes/tar eaooabarin4 tfts ireopcirty aubj.x t.d • • to the lien, provldad aaeb sortgags or deed r' tsu•t wee renamed . Ill. ' prior to the recording of the lien, and any putoaa.ar at any . ' • forsolownra or trustee's sale (ao well as any grants* by diked in lien of foreclosure or trust.,'• sale) under any prior sortgaga or deed of trust aball'take free and clear from any such than existing . • • lien, but otharvisa subject to the provisions of this Agresaant. 6.4 If the parties are unable to resolve their difference. as to an issue arising out of Sections 6.2, 6.1 or 6.2, the disputa • shall be sysolved by mingle-arbitrator arbitration before this v' American Arbitration Association under the cox:martial Arbitration •,sales sodifi.d as follows: (i) tba total time from data of.dsa:nd • for arbitration to final award shall not arded thirty (30) days! c! . (ii) the Arbitrator shall be chosen by the American Arbitration • CY •` Association without suboittal of lists and subject to challancj. .-'only for good can.. shown; (iii) all notices maybe by telephone or other slectronio oo:auaicatian with later confirmation in writing; - ' of •• (iv) the time, data end place of the Deming shall be sat by this • . Arbitrator in his or her sole discetion, provided that there shall ' • hi at least five (5) days prior notica of the bearing; (v) there t shall be no post-hearing briefs! (v1) theirs shall be no discovery sru.pt by order of the Arbitrator; and (vii) tan Arbitrator shall • • !ssua his or her aVard within seven (7) days after the close of the • i • bearin'1. •Any of the above provisions may be modified by 'stipulation of the partial'. the decision of the Arbitrator shall •-• b. final end non-appealable and enforosabls in any court of , oor•etsnt jurisdiction. The parties hereby release the Arbitrator •• from any end all claims or possible claimi against the Arbitrator T) based on the decision of the Arbitrator. 'lam prevailing petty in . 7 ' the proceeding shall be awarded reasonable attorneys' fees, avert r • and non-expert witness. costa and expenses, and other costs and • 7 '-• expenses incurred in connection with the arbitration,:unleal the: . • 'Arbitrator for good cacao det.rzlni■ otherwise. •This coat. and.f.is • , of the Arbitrator shall be borne by the non-prevail4"^, partyi• • unless the•Arbitrator for good cause dateraines othervia.r. i 's,•P07101 7L aslmsl-I10inOl?Z . • S. tact) party to this lgreesant hereby egra.■ 'to indemnify and' . • bold the other party harmless from and against any and all claims,'• -- damage., liabilities and expanses (including attorneys' faeo • incurred with or without litigation or on appeal) arising out of or:. _ •• - -.rl , . . i s :1fL Val"at31�t1 `4' n ..• .. . • 1 , • . . • . . . •• • • •• • . . t . , • . . . . . • 1 • . . . . . i • • . • . . . . ..,. • . . . . • . . • • EXH IB Peps o, • • • • 'i-is any Vey related to the na t of the Resonant Prcparty 1, .1, ,.. i party; its anployoas, tainnts,.s euta or i.svits.s. • Notr! ndinq the forsgo.Dg, If t`.•. L:earn., damages, liab 11,!..+s and-aspens.. so arising are eausod b' the oonaarrantnq li!aaoa os • botk parties, their .aployeos, tenants, agents or i.nvitc:., each .party shall indemnify the other only cc tha actant of the 1. ! ' . • indemnifying'p Y's own negligence or tb3t f iu agents, ta.Knts, .esploraaa Or 101itaas. The foregoing itadeffisi:' as :pacifically and expressly int.odaA;to constitute a wain.:of each perty'e immunity • under Industrial Iasoranca Title Si RCW, totha extent necessary to :'.Provide the indemnified party with a eoapleta indemnity for the • negligence of the indaaaeityinq party's employees, to the extant of their megliganos, And has base the sobi.ct of specific negotiation • batman the parties. Motoitbstand rrg the joint and several • liability labguaga via a via ECU, as outlined in section 1.2 above) any cle ilas sada by Fora under the $act!on' .2 indeatig .•r shall be allocated between creator and oranto. in accord.zios Pith •.the taros of this auction 7. 1SSOhI a r Zltafttya!'fnr n. .larm . Orentor hereby re.erwap the right to use the rs..aent Property bouover it wisher (including the right to oonstroot is onj ands and above the Yes �' _ use usesdoss not materially or unreasonably interfere fi with ° antes,. above- grantad right. under the Easements. lo addition, Grantor hereby :• • reserve. all other rights in and to the taaeaent Property not • .. specifically !ranted to Grants herein. gaorzox 11 esocar50ia 1.172_f$alawQ . • A11 of the.tiaras and conditions of this Agraasont shall run with the land and shall inure to tba benefit of, and ba binding • duo, the successors and assigns, personal repre►entatiy.s and _ parties hereto including without limitation all • Deraeuu.htowner of the Dominant cad asry ant Zstatae and.a 1 • claiming through or under tbea. 1 . i IIlg?ZIIS{ Sor YI6CESg»rwan■ . i 10.1 It either party to this Agreement oonsulta a- •"torn.y in order to enforce any of the terns of this Agrssaant, the prevailing patty shall be entitled to reimbursement by the non-prevail'party of the prevailing party's reasonable coats. and attorney.' Seam, whether sack oosts and attorney.' fea..aro incurred with or without litigation or on appeal (to the extant'inconsistent with the foregoing, the torsa of faction 6.4 shall foregoi .<ng rsg with era to the arbitration pr000dure described in ) • 11uweelarnAg . eocei.tiechclomen •T' worm G . aawa 4. . • `, 1C.1 5r'.ia Agreement constituter' the entire agrewhant party is with respect to this tas.aaat Tzcparty alyioq eo say oral, or vrittnn iapxwntation Made.' ' C-. other patty of the prineipais, agst►ta, .spinyers or aSSi tLs of •.bw tstiaa is caarensed in vritir, is �sr pazt. ramma. Ibis j��t j.�arosdas any prig vr:t�.uo �g►Tltaa bebl.en the partly pert.i a tie the ra.s.rint Tropnrt7. • S�! llgsraaaat sly bd aasod.dy )h a vzitittq sigasd by both • • parties. 10.3 Xo claim of waiver, comsat or avquisaoaace with reapsnt_ to any prosiaien of this Agreement shall be made against either party noises soak party has exps ssiy valved, oonsemtad or aognisaoad L vritioa. In such latter future Doti aiver,.o or t or .oquiasc000s shall aot apply to any ntn ' • • 10.s thin •reamant is the result of substantial negotiations • between and i from both parties and their r.sp.ctivc counsel. Compliantly, Igraaaaat shall be construed is accordance with .I the fair intact of language contained herein as a whole, and • in not for or against any party, r.qazdlmea of who performed the .i •'ascbanioal function of drafting this Agreaaant. • Cl 10.5 If either party defaults under this Ag .saint, the other p • pu*y say � any or all rights andm r .dies available at law so or in equity, including the right to sue for sp.cifio perforsanoa. a1 both parties acknowledge and agree that it is o.osasary that each party have available to it ■• a potential remedy the right to sus • • for specific parforsanoe. howv.r before exercising any rights or S res.dies, each party shall give tie other party vrittan notice of • the default and five (5) b1sin.ae days to cure a **notary default •• and thirty (30) days to cure a non-monetary default (if a ooa- •sonetary default cannot reasonably be cured within such 30 day . • •'•r period, the defaulting party shall bay, a longer period of time to • • our*'provided that tb. core is ooaanced within the 30 day period , L ., and is th.reaftar diligently pureaad to completion). In the event 1 non-sanatory:' of a sonatary.default or • non-sanatory default that is cured at • the avpanw cc the noo-defaulting party (the parties hereby agree a .� that the non-defaulting party shall have the right, hat not the . ; CD •:• obligation, to cure non-sonetIry defaults of the other party at the , m • aspens of the defaulting party if ties defaulting .arty has not 0 .. ::,•cured within the required time frame), the non-d.Ysultin; Tarty N aball have the lien right's outlined above in section s.3 (to the 0extant the terse of this &action 10.5 are irwonsiatent with the II , 1>"mtanux •� • :•err . ✓'...,i,...I `• .- . ME •ZZ. ..Y`, l ..�("{IB(J Page o+ r _. ■ a • • . • • :, 7. T ~ tat of i.cLion i above, Ma tarsal of gm tioa i Tall yv..r. ' • •sreepoOt to the smatters d.alt with in section i). gtairfai, • I zt„ �N xt., 6).r10,a 9- . • • n so cn • .. O • O N • O ` • . s • • 7 I • i 1 . ' - d a • ' . ••' •• l ' ..lt :i :7.. • , •• n EXHIBU Pepe �1 . • . 3UTZ Or nis�arO5 ) . ) s . WWI cr Us o ) • • . s• On thii: .1 . day of 11f6, 6t::ra se, do • 1 ail Po 1ioLa ate u.r Atata of t.shingtsr, . II dul ,innad sworn perranal_r p7ac. mi , )Quoin to se to L.A. Loa • ' o! AsseXSaSEt, the p l umasahip e*saatad the ; ; ;of instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to ba , .- ::-th• tray and volantary act and dead of said partnsrdhip, for the " tnsrain saotioaed, and on oath stated that.he/she was ' . a+athoviand to sesouts said instrument. . I I oartify that I know or have satiafactory evidanos that the -. i•ereon appearing before is and baking this acknowledgment la the • ' • • : cum Parson Whose true signature appears on this document. • VIl9Qs9 my hand and official real hareto affixed the day and • ':.year in the oertilicata above' vritttan. . • . cy • C+4,"/ .0 ,�-�,t- -••• .••• . .Ip • limn PoOLio Li and for • et tato!'",; I r1 Washington, residing at - r.�'� n Fry ooaieaioo expires !D.C.. ', ., • ` {7 t4 :rj�rt� ~ • . tom !' �7 . C)) 1 C p • • • • ' t4f/eG.1/i1dM •N• y� • esN�'Oall/IIACS7 • . ANA " • . •�•.I - IMO •'---- _ .. ' . • , .. • r • .. . ... • .--.., . • . • . • • .STA= 0? IC.SIEtonow ) •id . . . ) as. 1. • • 0=1W 07 KTJOG . ) • •• • ,•: • cc tkas Z7 day et _., , 1016, tv,fora s.. the i .• . , II.'. ''' • :... 0) r°) N (.0 • 0) . • • . .. ' . . .''.... ...s. • . . • 1- .undersigned, a notary Ihiblic— 1 .7.--iFdi ataW.washlrgtao, , " •'•duly oosaiesioned end warn pareecall.y &maimed ---4/7'AZ—• • Icemen to se ,c• t-e vha of 11JX3srf tittaf. ccePORATION, Us* corporation that • ' 1-, foragoing instrument, and acknowledged tha said inatrement to Ss Visa tree and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, tor tha therain mentioned, and on oath stated that he/aba was . ri) ..="origgsled to execute said instrusent. . . I oartify that X homy or hay& satisfm0t4ry evidence that the . .90 posecel appearing before as and making this acknowledgeant is the person trus aignatnre appears on this document. TTTSZS$ my hand and official seal barato affirood the day lld • ,.4 yaar in tha oertificats above written. t) c%1 ri 0 tt. cn .• • • . • • . . . . . . . . ; 1:114,11:135.11/4% illicallifmillu.nroint ...:: , Rovine 'riot aaa 4eZt4-/A Ji4teldi 1.4 vat/ 4 NOTARY PCnILIO in and for •a Stara of Washington, residing at . . Xy oonniasion expire. AMA, .•.••- •••:• • -Is.• . .. j...-4••• -..., ',.% . 1 .i• . I • 1 1 ,•'•?... ••i!.,:' 3'. 11; 7..' .• • ' ii -js .%1 •'t : , A " 40 • . • .: .JP ,"zi.r..0 • . .•.1'01,4 • • - -0 itiOr& o i .• .11' i .. .4 . ... . .: 4 • • ' . . ' . ' . • • • • . . , . • . . . . , . — • . " . ' .. . • . . . . . . ' . • • . . • • • • • • . • . • . .. • . • . • • •. . . _ 114 . • . 1 . ' . TiqTetieji5i Tide. . • . • ' 1 • • . i • I .., .. .4 9 '' • . . , • .. .. ... • ... . • -.• . . II , , -" - • • . . . • . . •.: ., ,1 . .. • . . . , .. . - • • - -- - • • : • -•-• . ,. .,.......„,.:... ..- •-i'i.:•.-4 kr.•:.. ....--...---, •:. •. " '' .- . - •.• .• .. f.XrilBITA - Page 00.t.J1 • ,^ • ___. •,. s ( • ..• .. • : • : r•••••• i--..„ . _. . . ... . . . Pg• . 1_,' PM . . tun rz I."... 7- .. mos.sasiacarr.mac Si rocsatuso At 1.'POPTIoN Of LIT 7 ACColtour .1. 10 142 IIENE/43TON NORTHERN Mobs)sus PLAN Al NE00f.:10D F.V0U?'. 161 04 susvEYS AT ?AO ES S THROUGH I I. MICONOs Of DID ColloTT. wASHINOTO.1 DillOssiD NE FoLLOwS, • C014148401100 AT TX!PENIXWEST CO riFilF OF SAD LOT 7.THEN=SOttTI4 S7•50•47" • as:AWED THE NORTH MI MEMO,2.611.31 PEET TO THI IT OP SICIFINFFI: • ' 1 IfhICE CONTIKUPS)SOUTH 1171047 LAST 42.37 FEET:THENCE SOUTH 441417' WEST 21711 FEET TO OW SIOPOINO OF A CURVE TO THE fOSKT HAW A MINUS OF *JOAO PELT THROUGH A COITNAL ANCAR Of irons°AN MC SISTAHCE Of FE.= • • FEET/THBOOS SOUTH 13'4410r WEST 224.17 PEET TO THE WEST UHE OF SAD LOT 7 . . AMID THE EAST MARGIN OF UM AsIFJ4U4 THENCE NORTH cO•Ofrzr LAST ALONo sAto WLST Lir 3042 Mtn THENCE MOUTH 11'441306 FAST 210.73 LEFT TO THE StOFIMNS . . OF A CURVE TO THE LIFT RAMC A MODS Or 10400 FEET TOCUGH A Ct#MIL.41.AleJLE .1, . . or al•srar AN AAC DISTANCE OF 17.is FUT TO THE MONTH upg OF sAio LOT 7 040 •Itit pow OF SIONOENCI. . 1 COKTAINNO LILO SOuAAI FEET Oft 0.21*CMS NOM OR Les$. . • . . • ! • R. . . . . t, • i . c-> e c-) ... . . . ro . ..•• . .; • . c.) . :. • . N . . . . . • • i • • CZ , . . 1-,• • .. . . . - CI ) • • . . • it . . • .... . . ..• . .. . 3 :. .• ., •, . . . 6.4•. - ..1.04 . • . . ..,, • •. • .. •., . • . ,. ;-- • . . . • .• 1 • s - : ., . . . . . . . . . . • • •• • . . . • • .• • • • • • . • . , . • • • .I . • • . • . . . . . • •. ID i •••. • te144.1,8#8.111. • •• . . • •' • • . • •• ... •.•8 • 714. . ........a..- . /• . • . . EXHIBIT Page _Lk of , . . . . . . . . . . ..."-.-- ••.:.*.:•:', ,•••••O. . P... : •- ' . .,:., : : .. '..:.7; ..?..:•: ,•-: . .•. .r.:...:...*:.$:.:.?..')',.''.:.%. . . . . I • . -.'...'•..'•'.. _ • N•.. . .• 1 • . . • 79; ' . I s• • • • • I : ) 1•• . . , ._ . . . . . . ijltl. . . !. . ....., 1 il _. ..._., .._.._ . • • F . ,.: i .1 iii er •1� ~ • 1, ir 11 /; •fit\ \ �' • . .. 11 4 . . . N . . I. . i . 1 .41i —iq . . �►1 i1 : I!I' j!J; hR Cf) .In I 44b‘. il5 ill -r• . 1 01 .4 . ., .k..41.; . ‘ i • . 0 . . . . r, • I f • !ft, : Ili \ 11 .1 . . . . . E . , Al ti; ♦ , tii cr) ..:.; tii.4N:. - . -1 • :. .. . . . • 4: 4r4dt\\• S . . .. , • iiiiii °1444\1.\.. • 's \:..t ..:7 . . INSIlik ' •... • \ Ii • / • .. - wrf a1f/f� , [. • - • 6 r • / • • j • r • I r •� ri. . • • • Q(HIBIT Papa d . ft. .✓;lcaii...th... i • �ti lOIMXB ' 1 b. ,. 7 . . • "271;7" 1-; :..-:.•": • - -• ;s::oP� i•i 5.. •: •:;...•".:.,2'-1') ji:*i r'J.F.-• ..`'.•" • • • • • • •• • • 0 I 11.11.1110011111111........1111.1111111..111111111...1.11.11.111.111111111111111111111111.1.1111.11111111.11111.11.111.11.11111.10 • • . •. - WIN ....•w pee •.. w •1 it • •• , I. •• ' 1 �C�•O•• 1 • - 1 • V/ • • F O • • J', • • 0 1 • . 2 •4 � 1 • r . • • • .1, • • . • i , •i131rO" ▪ b 1• • . t•t I • • r I . • • l •• • 1 • • l t •. • .. ii ✓ .!_ ,