Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SWP273227
nald Straka - Renton Village Expansion SDC Payment From: Ronald Straka To: Gregg Zimmerman Date: 08/08/2006813:48AM Subject: Renton Village Expansion SDCPayment | requested Technical Services hn see if the System Development Charge fee had been paid for the Renton Village Expansion project. Based upon the permits that have been issued, noSOCfaa'o (VVahoc 837.744.82 and Storm: $10.703.42) have been paid by the developer of the project. The fee's were calculated last year and were based upon the 2005 SDC fee amounts. The SDCfees were increased in January 2000. The new fee amounts would increase the 3OC fees that need tobe paid, if the new rates were charged upon time ofpayment. I also learned that Technical Services does the SDC fee calculation for projects and provides that to Development Services who is supposed to collect the SDC fee at the time the permit is issued, but no one verifies that the fees have actually been paid. P From: Ronald Straka To: Arneta Henninger Date: 10/12/2005 3:50:20 PM Subject: Fwd-. RE: RENTON VILLAGE The gravel area is not impervious and therefore is subject to the SDC Fee. The site is subject to the Surface Water SDC fee as determined by the Technical Services Division. The SDC fee is due for the net increase in impervious surface that will be added to the site. >>>Arneta Henninger 10/12/05 1:27 PM >>> Hi Ron, Here is the info. you requested on your voice mail to me the other day. Let me know if there is anything else you need. >>> "Hernandez, Nicole" <N H ernandez(a),wh Pacific.com> 10/12/05 1:23 PM >>> Arneta, The existing impervious area at the site was 4.08 acres (gravel and asphalt). The proposed impervious area is 3.83 acres for a decrease of 0.25 acres. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks. Nicole -----Original Message----- From: Arneta Henninger fmailto:Ahenninger(cDci.renton.wa.usl Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 9:48 AM To: Hernandez, Nicole Cc: Ronald Straka Subject: RENTON VILLAGE Good Morning Nicole, Would you please calculate the square footage of new impervious area on this project. We need this for our storm records and also to calculate the fees for the owner/developer. Thank you! Arneta CC: David Christensen; Karen McFarland; Lys Hornsby akc 1 PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW #2005- DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ❑ PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP �( ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ❑ OTHER APPLICANT: jo, IL:zt� TAVA v— RECEIVED FROM&QIZ.I� JOB ADDRESS: 55 5 WO# 7 7 y ZW (date) 3<t YUS NATURE OF WORK: Ccwl< GREEN# ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: ❑ LEGAL DESCRIPTION Cg?� SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑ VICINITY MAP ❑ NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE ❑ OTHER ❑ VESTED ❑ NOT VESTED ❑ This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# dated ❑ PARENT PID#(subject to change)_ SUBJECT PROPERTY PID# 1 l 2 JIU J ' 9 ❑ King Co.Tax Acct#(new) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Perm it/Construction Permit application.The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement ( vt) WATER Latecomer Agreement ( vt)WASTENVATER Latecomer Agreement( vt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER Joint Use Agreement (METRO) Local Im rovement District Traffic Benefit Zones 75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS I I I E SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE- WATER #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE ❑ Pd Prev. ❑ Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) Never Pd SQ. FTG. Sin le'family residential $1,525/ttnit x Mobile home dwelling unit $1220/unit in park Apartment, Condo$915/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.213/sq. ft. of property (not less than$1525.00)x Boeing, by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2,800 GPM threshold) S STEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE- WASTEWATER Pd Prev. ❑ Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) ❑ Never Pd Single family residential dwelling unit $900/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$720/unit x Apartment, Condo$540/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.126/sq. ft. of property(not less than$900.00) x REDT��EL��VIEiTd,CRDZT. era _ `- i £ Does NOT Apply ❑ Nfay APPIY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER ❑ Pd Prev. ❑ Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$715/unit x All other properties $0.249/sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not less than $715.00) 4 PRELIMINARY TOTAL a o a of Reviewing Authority DATE trt * It subject property is within an LID, it is developer's responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. ) m ** If an additional water meter(or hydrant) is being installed for fire protection or an additional water meter is being installed for private m landscape irrigation, please advise as above fees may change. � 7 O ,y 1 V z EFFECTIVE: January 1, 2005 c� C CHARGES FOR EQUITABLE SHARE OF PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES: Owners of properties to which improvements are being proposed that have not been assessed or charged an equitable share of the cost of public works facilities, such as water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and street improvements including signalization and lighting, shall be subject to one or more of the charges listed in the following subsections. Any fees triggered by improvements or development, as detailed in this Section, are due and payable at the first of the following instances: Prior to the issuance of a Public Works Construction Permit; or Prior to the recording of a single family residential plat or single family residential short plat; or Prior to the issuance of a building permit. All of the following charges shall be paid into the waterworks utility construction fund except that any fees collected under a private latecomer's agreement shall be passed on to the holder of the agreement with the appropriate fees paid to the general fund. For the purposes of this Section, the terms "property(ies)"or"parcel(s)"shall mean a lot of record as defined in chapter 4-11 RMC. 1. Private Held Latecomer's Fees and Special Assessment District(Formerly Known as City Held Latecomer's) Fees: a. Applicability of Private Held Latecomer's Fee: The City has the discretionary power, as detailed in chapter 9-5 RMC, to grant latecomer's agreements to developers and owners for the reimbursement of a pro rata portion of public works facilities (water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and street improvements including signalization and lighting)they install and turn over to the City. b. Applicability of Special Assessment District Fee: The special assessment charge is a fee that enables the City to recover a pro rata portion of the original costs of public works improvements (water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and street improvements including signalization and lighting)from the owners of property who would benefit from future connections to, or future users of, improvements to the City's infrastructure that were not installed by LIDs or by a private developer under a latecomer agreement. The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning these charges are detailed in chapter 9-16 RMC, Special Assessment Districts. Interest may be charged pursuant to RMC 9-16-6, Payments to City. c. Exemptions for Latecomer's or Special Assessment District Fees: i. Segregation of Fees: The City may grant segregation of private developer latecomer's fees or special assessment district fees on large parcels of land per subsection (C)(3) of this Section. ii. Relief Due to Two (2) Similar Facilities: The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will consider relieving a parcel of a latecomer's or special assessment district fee/assessment if the property has a benefit from either(but not both) of two (2)similar facilities. The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will make the decision based on engineering and policy decisions as to which facility(ies) benefit and/or are utilized by the parcel. The assessment due would be that associated with the utilized facility. If there are no sound engineering or policy reasons that indicate one facility over the other, the City shall give the applicant the choice of facilities to utilize. iii. Relief Due to Future Subdivision: At the time the latecomer's agreement or special assessment district is formed, and as a condition of the latecomer's agreement or special assessment district, the City may require that the assessment against a parcel be divided such that a single family residential connection will be assessed based upon the size of a typical single family residential lot in that ©2004 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 1 area. The remainder of the cost attributed to said site will be due at such time as the parcel develops further either by subdivision or increased density. In the case of a special assessment district, interest will continue to accrue on the remaining portion of the assessment. iv. Reallocation of Assessment Due to Subdivision of Property: The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will consider reallocation of the latecomer's assessment or the special assessment if a property is subdivided for any purpose other than single family use. Reallocation may be granted based upon front footage, area, or other equitable means. Consideration may be given to adjusting the assessment between the new parcels, based upon value of benefit from the improvements, such that two (2) similar parcels may pay different amounts because one receives more benefit. 2. System Development Charges (SDC)—Water, Wastewater, and Surface Water: The City may hold and charge certain other fees similar to special assessment district charges, which are commonly referred to as "system development charges." a. Applicability of System Development Charge: The system development charge is hereby imposed against properties and, by inference, the owners of said properties which have not been assessed or charged or borne an equitable share of the cost of the City's utility systems. Said property owner(s)shall pay, prior to connection to or benefit from a City utility or utility facility, the system development charge associated with that utility as detailed in the fees table in subsection (C)(2)(b) of this Section. A parcel may benefit from a City utility system during the development or redevelopment of the property with or without a connection to an established facility. Therefore, the system development charge for a utility may be triggered without a physical connection to an existing facility. i. "Development of a utility system" shall mean: Development of the sanitary sewer system, including but not limited to lift stations, force mains, interceptors and other sewer collection mains. Development of the surface water system, including but not limited to retention/detention or water quality facilities, flood hazard reduction improvements, lift stations, force mains, interceptors, and other surface water collection and conveyance systems. Development of the water system, including but not limited to wells, pump stations, reservoirs and transmission mains. ii. The phrase "properties, which have not been assessed or charged or borne an equitable share of the cost of the utility," as used in this Section, shall mean any of the following: First Time Service Connection or Benefit: Any property which has not paid a system development charge for the property based upon the total square footage of the property and which is connecting to or benefiting from a Renton utility system for the first time (including but not limited to new construction, conversion from private well, or conversion from septic system). Further Subdivision: Any property which has not paid a system development charge for the property based upon the total square footage of the property and is served or benefited by the utility and is subdividing further for single family usage shall receive a credit for the existing single family residence(s). For example, a five (5)acre parcel with an existing single family house is being subdivided for single family lots. If the existing house is connected to the City sewer and water systems, the development would get credit for one single family system development charge for sanitary sewer, storm water, and water. If the existing house was not connected to the City sewer system, the development would get credit for one single family system development charge for storm water and water. A property subdividing further for single family usage that receives a credit for existing single family residence(s) shall not qualify for prorating of the system development charge under subsection ©2004 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 2 , f (C)(2)(c)of this Section. Existing Developments—Water and/or Sanitary Sewer: Property that was developed before the effective date of the first development charge ordinances for water and sanitary sewer in 1974 is exempted from the connection charge(s)for water and sanitary sewer. Any rebuilding, change in use or additions to exempted property that does not require additional water usage such that a fire hydrant, additional meter, or larger meter is necessary will not trigger a new system development charge. However, except as provided herein, when property is redeveloped or the use changed or intensified such that larger or additional water meter(s) or the addition of a fire hydrant is necessary, application(s)for these items will trigger the system development charge(s). An application for the installation of a meter(s) solely for the purpose of either irrigation or fire protection or the installation of a fire hydrant will trigger a system development charge for water. An application for an additional or a larger water meter(s)for any purpose other than solely for irrigation or fire protection will trigger a system development charge for both water and sewer. Exceptions: The addition of an irrigation meter only for an existing single family residential dwelling will not trigger a system development charge for water or sewer. If an existing single family residence is being remodeled or rebuilt and remains a single family residence on the same lot(not involved in a new plat, short plat, or lot line adjustment), the addition of a larger or additional meter will not trigger the system development charges for water or sewer. The addition of a second meter to an existing duplex in order to divide consumption for billing purposes will not trigger a system development charge. Existing Developments — Surface Water: Property that was developed before the effective date of the first development charge ordinances for surface (storm) water in 1992 is exempted from the surface water system development charge. The addition of any new impervious surface to exempted properties will require payment of the system development charge for surface water for the additional new impervious area only. If an exempted property is making a connection for the first time to a surface water system, it will require payment of the system development charge for surface water only for the impervious area tributary to the point of connection. Any rebuilding, change in use or additions to exempted property that does not create additional impervious surface area or does not cause a first-time connection to be made will not require payment of the system development charge for surface water. Exceptions: Improvements to existing single family residential units such as additions that are less than five hundred (500)square feet, decks, small sheds and other minor improvements are exempt from the system development charge for surface water unless a new connection to the Renton surface water utility collection system is proposed or required as part of the permit application. b. System Development Charge Table: ©2004 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 3 Type of Land Use: Water Fee Amount: Wastewater Fee Surface Water Amount: Fee Amount: Single family residence $1,956.00 per dwelling $1,017.00 per $759.00 per (including mobile/manufactured unit dwelling unit dwelling unit homes) Multi-family $1,174.00 per dwelling $610.00 per dwelling $0.265 per square (in all zones except CD unit(auxiliary buildings unit(auxiliary foot of new and COR zones) like club houses are buildings like club impervious considered inclusive to houses are surfacing, but not the development and considered inclusive less than $759.00 are not counted as a to the development dwelling unit and are and are not counted thus not included in as a dwelling unit and the calculation of the are thus not included fee) in the calculation of the fee) Mixed use Mixed use buildings Mixed use buildings $0.265 per square (in all zones except CD with over 50%floor with over 50%floor foot of new and COR zones) space used for space used for impervious residential shall be residential shall be surface, but not assessed at the rate of assessed at the rate less than $759.00 $1,174.00 per dwelling of$610.00 per unit dwelling unit CD and COR zones $0.273 per gross $0.142 per gross $0.265 per square square foot of square foot of foot of new property, but not less property, but not less impervious than $1,956.00 than $1,017.00 surface, but not less than $759.00 All other uses $0.273 per gross $0.142 per gross $0.265 per square square foot of square foot of foot of new property, but not less property, but not less impervious than $1,956.00 than $1,017.00 surface, but not less than $759.00 (Amd. Ord. 5040, 11-24-03) c. Prorating the System Development Charge for Redevelopment of Property: An option exists for prorating the system development charge(s)for property which has not previously paid a charge in full. Any parcel that currently has water or sanitary sewer service is eligible for a prorated system development charge for the associated utility. i. Prorating Based upon Meter Sizes: The prorated system development charge will be based upon the capacity of the new meters as compared to the capacity of the existing meters. Meters installed solely for fire protection, either existing or proposed, are not included in the ©2004 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 1 calculation for water or sanitary sewer. If there is an additional or larger meter solely for fire flow or additional hydrants required for the proposed development, please refer also to subsection (C)(2)(d)(i) of this Section. Meters installed solely for irrigation (either existing or proposed)are not included in the calculation for sanitary sewer. This prorated redevelopment charge is calculated using the following formula: [Proposed meter(s)capacity in gallons per minute (GPM)— Existing meter(s) capacity in GPM]/[Proposed meter(s)capacity in GPM]x [SDC Fee] =Amount owed. The City will determine the safe maximum operating capacities of all meter sizes using American Water Works Association tables (see below). The fee paid shall be posted in the City's database and applied to the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. Reduction in meter capacity shall not result in a payment from the City to the applicant. WATER METER EQUIVALENCIES for purposes of calculating redevelopment credit: ©2004 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 2 Meter Size In Inches Safe Maximum Operating Capacity(GPM) 5/8 20 5/8 x 3/4 20 3/4 30 1 50 1-1/2 100 2 160 3 300 4 500 6 1000 8 1600 10 2300 12 3375 20 8250 ii. Prorating the System Development Charge for Fire Protection Improvements Associated with Redevelopment of Property: Installation of a water meter solely for a fire protection system, such as a new hydrant or fire sprinkler system, shall be charged a fee equal to thirty percent(30%)of the system development charge applicable to the portion of the parcel containing the improvements for which the fire protection system is constructed to serve. Thirty percent(30%) is the amount the water utility has expended throughout its system for fire flow protection. This fee shall be posted to the City's database and applied as a partial payment to the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. For the purposes of this Section, "portion of the parcel containing the improvements for which the fire protection system is constructed to serve" shall be described as: The smaller area of either the total square footage of the property or the square footage of the property designated by a line drawn twenty(20)feet around the footprint of the building being served by the meter installed for fire protection. The smaller area of either the total square footage of the property or the square footage of the property designated by a line drawn twenty(20)feet around the footprint of the building(s)which by their construction, reconstruction or improvement triggered the need for the new fire hydrant(s). "Footprint" shall include the primary building plus ancillary structures such as garages, ©2004 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 1 carports, sheds, etc., that are considered by the Fire Department when calculating fire flow requirements. In the case of multiple improvements, overlapping areas shall only be counted once. If the"portion of the parcel containing the improvements for which the fire protection system is constructed to serve" is eighty percent(80%)of the parcel or more, then the thirty percent(30%) shall be calculated on the total square footage of the property. If a project both increases water meter capacity and installs a fire protection system, the total of both prorated system development fees (subsections (C)(2)(c)(i)and (ii)of this Section)would be charged. Payment of said fees would be posted in the City's database and applied to the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. In no case shall the total of the prorated system development charge(s) be more than the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. Installation of a water meter solely for a fire protection system shall not trigger a sewer system development fee. iii. Prorating the System Development Charge for Installation of an Irrigation Meter Only: When a water meter is installed solely for the purpose of providing irrigation water for private landscaping (exempt meter), there will be charged a fee equal to ten percent(10%) of the water system development charge applicable to the property. Said fee shall be nonrefundable and nontransferable (from one portion of the property to another). Payment of said fee would be posted in the City's database and applied to the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. At the applicant's option, the full water system development charge may be paid instead of the ten percent(10%) payment described herein. iv. Examples: Example 1: A redevelopment project that involves a change from a single family home on a ten thousand (10,000)square foot lot with a five-eighths inch by three-quarter inch meter(5/8 "x 3/4" , a standard single family meter)that has a safe operating capacity of twenty(20)gallons per minute (GPM), to a commercial usage with a one and one-half inch (1-1/2 " ) meter with a safe operating capacity of one hundred (100)GPM can apply to pay for the following prorated charges: (100 GPM—20 GPM)/(100 GPM) = 0.8 For water: 0.8 x(10,000 sq.ft. x$0.273/sq. ft.) _$2,184.00 For sewer: 0.8 x(10,000 sq. ft. x$0.142/sq. ft.) _ $1,136.00 Without the redevelopment credit, this project would have paid $0.142/sq. ft. x 10,000 sq.ft. _ $1,420.00 for sewer and paid $0.273/sq. ft. x 10,000 sq. ft. _$2,730.00 for water. Example 2: A property owner is planning to redevelop a half acre parcel that includes a single family home with a five-eighths inch by three-quarter inch meter(5/8"x 3/4 " , a standard single family meter)that has a safe operating capacity of twenty(20) GPM. The new development will be an eight(8) unit multi-family dwelling with a two inch (2 " ) meter with a safe operating capacity of one hundred sixty (160) GPM, a three-quarter inch (3/4 " ) irrigation meter with a safe operating capacity of thirty(30) GPM, and a four inch (4 " ) meter for fire sprinklers. The property owner can apply to pay the following prorated charges: For water: based on meters (160 GPM + 30 GPM—20 GPM)/(160 GPM + 30 GPM) = 89.5% Based on fire service = 30% Total = 119.5% Therefore, 100% of the water system development charge would be due. ©2004 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 2 (8 units x$1,174.00/unit = $9,392.00) For sewer: based on meters— irrigation meter excluded (160 GPM—20 GPM)/(160 GPM) _ 87.5% Therefore, 87.5% of the sewer system development charge would be due. 87.5% x(8 units x$610.00/unit) _ $4,270.00 Without the redevelopment credit, this project would have paid $610.00/unit x 8 units = $4,880.00. (Amd. Ord. 5040, 11-24-03) d. Exemptions to System Development Charge: i. Installation of an Irrigation Meter Solely for the Purpose of Providing Irrigation Water to City Right-of-Way: Installation of a water meter solely for the purpose of providing irrigation water to City right-of-way is exempted from the system development charge. ii. Exemption for City-Owned Property: No system development charge will be collected on City-owned properties. The benefits to the utility from the use of other City properties such as utility easements, lift stations and other benefits offset the amount of the system development charge. iii. Limited Exemptions for Municipal Corporations: A limited exemption to the system development charge will be granted to municipal corporations for portions of property subject to the system development charge to the extent that those specific areas are available and maintained at all times for public use (e.g., ballfields adjacent to a school building)and shall be segregated from the fee determination as herein provided. In applying this exemption to the extent possible, a single straight line shall be drawn across the property separating the exempt property from the property to be charged. If a single straight line would not achieve substantial equity, then additional lines may be drawn to include substantial open space areas in the exemption. For purposes of this exemption, substantial open space areas shall be at least one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet in area. Lines shall not be drawn closer than fifteen feet(15 ' )to any structure. Nonexempt Areas: Parking lots, driveways, walkways, similar areas and required landscape areas shall not be part of the exempt area. Administrative Fees: The applicant shall pay the City's administrative costs for the preparation, processing and recording the segregated fee. At the time of application for system development charge segregation the applicant shall pay the administrative fee of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00). Restrictive Covenants: The exemption must be memorialized by means of a restrictive covenant running with the land. Should the property exempted under this Section later develop, then that property shall pay the system development charge in place at the time of development. Interpretation of Partial Payment: The Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department shall make the final decision on the interpretation of this limited exemption and the achievement of substantial equity. iv. Exemption for Undeveloped Critical Area(s)and Undeveloped Major Easement(s): When calculating the area to be charged the system development charge, undeveloped critical areas (per RMC 4-11-030)and undeveloped major easements within the property shall not be included in the square footage for the calculation of the charge. It is the responsibility of the property owner or applicant to submit a study determining and classifying the critical area. The property owner or applicant shall submit a legal description of any easement(s) or critical area(s) so that these portions of the property can be exempted from the development charge(s). ©2004 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 3 The intent of this exemption is to not charge property that is undevelopable. If the property is used or can be used to satisfy any condition of the development such as parking or landscaping, it shall be considered developed and does not meet the qualifications of this exemption. v. Exemption Credit for Regional Improvements: If an applicant's project proposes to solve a regional drainage problem, over and above the requirements to mitigate their project's impacts, the value of the additional improvement shall be credited toward the surface water system development charges due. The applicant must provide the Administrator of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works with the costs of the drainage improvements and a suggested method of calculating the costs due to the extra work done to solve a regional drainage problem. The Administrator will make the final decision on the amount of the credit. In no instance shall the credit duplicate a latecomer's agreement such that the applicant will be paid twice, nor may the credit against the connection charge exceed the connection charge (i.e., no payment to the applicant under this Section). vi. Surface Water Exemption for Infiltration Facility: Developments which infiltrate or contain on site one hundred percent(100%)of the on-site storm water runoff volume from a one hundred (100) year storm are exempt from the surface water system development charge. For the application of this credit, the owner/developer must use the current design criteria to show that the infiltration facility will infiltrate all of the volume of runoff produced from the site during the one hundred (100)year storm. If a development that is granted an exemption under this Section discharges water off-site during a one hundred (100)year storm or less, the development shall be required to make corrections or improvements to the on-site system such that it will infiltrate up to the one hundred (100)year storm. If, in the future, the development can no longer infiltrate one hundred percent(100%)of the on-site storm water runoff from a one hundred (100)year storm, the system development charge shall be due and payable as a condition of the connection to or utilization of the City's storm water system. Nothing in this Section shall relieve the property owner(s)from complying with the City's current flow control and water quality treatment standards at the time the development converts from one hundred percent(100%) infiltration to use of the City storm system. When a development is converted from one hundred percent (100%) infiltration to use of the City storm system, the storm water management standards used shall consider the existing conditions prior to the property being developed under the one hundred percent(100%) infiltration exemption and the developed conditions at the time the conversion is made. There may be certain areas within the City that partially or completely prohibit the use of infiltration facilities. If a current or future code or standard prohibits or limits the use of infiltration facilities to any level below the one hundred (100)year storm, the development will not qualify for this exemption. 3. Segregation Criteria and Rules: Except for parcels being developed for single family use, the ability exists for the segregation of system development, special assessment district, and latecomer's charges if there is partial development of a large parcel of property. This segregation shall be based on the following criteria and rules: a. Segregation by Plat or Short Plat: Charges shall be determined on the basis of the specific platted properties being developed regardless of the parcel size. Unplatted or large-platted parcels may be platted or short-platted prior to development, in which case the system development charge will be applied to the specific platted lots being developed. b. Segregation by Administrative Determination: For the partial development of a large tract of property, the owner may apply for a segregation of the system development, special assessment district, and latecomer's charge(s)for the specific portion of the property to be developed. The burden of establishing the segregation by legal description, number of units, and map would be on the party owing the fee and not the City. The following criteria shall determine the segregation of fees: ©2004 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 4 i. Provisions: This provision shall apply to all developments with the exception of single family residential home developments. When a parcel is segregated by administrative determination, prorating of the system development charge for redevelopment shall not be allowed. ii. Segregation of Fees: The segregation of fees shall be by formal, written agreement, including a legal description approved by the City, which shall be recorded as a restrictive covenant running with the land. The restrictive covenant shall list the percentage of the system development charge fee that has been paid for the property. The applicant shall also include a detailed plan, drafted to current adopted City standards, of the proposed development, which shall include the proposed boundary line, as described in the legal description, for the system development charge determination. iii. Segregated Areas: Minimum size of area segregated for determination and payment of system development charge(s) shall be two (2)acres. The segregated area shall include, but not be limited to, all contiguous existing developed land for which the system development charge(s) have not been paid; all proposed buildings; driveways and sidewalks; parking areas; grass and landscape areas; public access areas; storm drainage facilities and detention ponds; and improvements required for mitigation of environmental impacts under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). The boundary line for the segregation of system development charge shall be established by survey and legal description and shall not be closer than fifteen feet(15 ' )to any structure. iv. Remnant Parcel: Minimum size of the remnant parcel of undeveloped property for which the system development charge is deferred shall be two (2)acres. Should the property partially paid for under this Section later develop, then that property shall pay the system development charge fee in place at the time of development. Should the property partially paid for under this Section later be subdivided, then the partial payment credit shall run with the subdivided lots. The burden of establishing that the partial payment has been made would be on the party owing the fee and not on the City. v. Determination of Charge: The system development charge shall be determined on the basis of the percentage of a property that is developed (existing development plus proposed development). When a proposed development takes a parcel over the threshold of full development, as described in this Section, one hundred percent(100%) of the system development charge(s) is owed and any balance is due and payable. vi. Full Development: For the purpose of this Code, "full development" is considered to be sixty percent(60%) property coverage for multi-family development and eighty percent(80%) property coverage for commercial, industrial, mixed use, and all other development. "Property coverage" is defined as the portion of the property supporting buildings, driveways and sidewalks, parking areas, grass and landscape areas, public access areas, storm drainage facilities and detention ponds, and improvements required for mitigation of environmental impacts under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). vii. Developed Area: The "developed area"shall include, but not be limited to, all contiguous existing developed land for which the system development charges have not been paid: all existing and proposed buildings, driveways and sidewalks, parking areas, grass and landscape areas, public access areas, storm drainage facilities and detention ponds, and improvements required for mitigation of environmental impacts. viii. Administrative Fees: The applicant shall pay the City's administrative costs for the preparation, processing and recording of the partial payment of the fee(s). At the time of application for system development charge partial payment the applicant shall pay the administrative fee of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00)for each segregation. If the same segregation is used for more than one utility's system development charge, then only one administrative fee is collected. ix. Interpretation: The Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department shall make the final decision on interpretation of the partial payment of system development charges. (Ord. 4205, 2-20-1989; Ord. 4415, 8-16-1993; Ord. 4444, 3-28-1994; Ord. 4505, 4-10-1995; Ord. 4506, ©2004 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 5 4-10-1995; Ord. 4508; Ord. 4525; Ord. 4526, 6-12-1995; Amd. Ord. 4872, 11-20-2000; Ord. 4875, 12-4-2000; Ord. 5000, 1-13-2003; Ord. 5153, 9-26-2005; Ord. 5169, 12-5-05) ©2004 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 6 From the east a culvert carries flow from the south side of Sam's Club, and from a flume that carries runoff from east of 1-405 (from City streets and the east branch of Rolling Hills Creek). From the south a system in Talbot Road S carries flow from a small section of Talbot Road. At the north side of the Renton Village area at least two City storm systems carry runoff from S Grady Way into the storm systems on those properties. There may be other connections from S Grady Way that are not shown on the City inventory system. Flooding Problem Renton Village experiences frequent flooding due to the lack of capacity of the main drainage system running through the complex. The connection of the 72-inch storm system to the 42-inch system (point C) forms a bottleneck when flows exceed the capacity of the 42-inch pipe. In addition, the 48-inch pipe that discharges to the open channel (point B) has a negative slope of —1.2%. The outlet of the 48-inch pipe is about 2.1 feet lower than the inlet. Finally, the west end of the open channel south of Renton Cinema lost capacity by partially filling with sediment and vegetative growth. During intense or prolonged storms the drainage system experiences backwater, and storm water flows out of the lowest manholes and catch basins in Renton Village. Flooding seems to start in the manhole at the bend of the 48-inch pipe on the One Renton property, and at point C where the 42-inch and 72-inch pipes connect. Flooding continues out of the lowest catch basins in the parking lots. In severe events water has flooded the lower sections of the complex parking lots to a depth of 2 feet or more. During prolonged rainfall events the storm systems continue to backwater causing flooding on S Grady Way and Talbot Road S. The Renton Village area is a low area that has probably always been susceptible to flooding. Approximately the west half of the area between Rainier Ave. S and Talbot Road S is shown on the FEMA Flood Maps as a flood area for the 100-year flood (see Figure 3). Even with improvements to the drainage system it is likely that some flooding will continue to occur on the Renton Village area. Drainage System Development and Ownership This section attempts to answer questions on ownership and maintenance responsibility of sections of the existing drainage system starting at the downstream end (Figure 1, Point A). 48-inch Culvert under 1-405— Point A At the downstream end of the main drainage system the 48-inch culvert under 1-405 was probably built by WSDOT. Ownership and maintenance responsibilities are probably WSDOT's. 132-inch Culvert under 1-405— Point A The 132-inch culvert was constructed by WSDOT about 1987-88 as part of the "Tukwila to SR-167 HOV Lanes" project. The City Council passed Resolution 2682 on June 8, 1987 authorizing the Mayor to execute the necessary agreements with WSDOT (CAG-87-041). The Mayor signed Local Agency Participating Agreement Number GC 8164 with the WSODT on June 8, 1987 for upsizing the culvert to 132-inches to make it a 100-year design HAFile Sys\SWP-Surface Water Projects\SWP-27-Surface Water Projects(CIP)\27-2711 Renton Village\2005 CIP Pipe Rplcrnt\1000 Corrspd\041004 Project-outline.doc Page 3 of 13 culvert. The City's share was estimated at 52.43% ($393,924) of the total cost for the culvert. It appears that the City had an agreement with Renton Village to pay $60,000 toward construction of the new culvert. A letter dated October 6, 1987�SDOTs Renton for he project Company to pay $60,000 to the City so the City can pay (Appendix B). I could not find a signed agreement with Renton Village in the Clerk's records or City files. The Local Agency Participating Agreement with WSDOT contains a sections stating "Upon completion of the work outlines the sole all costfuture of theoperations LOCAL AGENCY maintenance and without expense AGENCY's facilities shall be to the STATE". The Agreement does not seem clear about culvert ownership and any future replacement. It appears that the City is responsible for maintenance of the 132-inch culvert. Open Channel South of Renton Cinema— Point A to B The open channel was probably originally constructed as part of the property development, and/or when 1-405 was constructed. Before 1988 the existing drainage system south of the cinema consisted of the 48-inch culvert under 1-405, about 125 feet of open channel, 210 feet of 48-inch culvert, and the remaining open channel heading for point B. In 1988 Renton Village Cinema submitted a plan to enlarge the cinema (City plan number D- 1883). As part of that plan the 210 foot Section of 48-inch pipe was removed and replaced with a new open channel that connected to the existing channel. Since the open channel is located VA Con enemrivate a LLC rapdrties HALt appears Real Estatet parts Those ientities d be owned by RVA Office L would also be responsible for maintenance. 48-inch and 42-inch Pipes— Point B to C These pipes were probably constructed by the property owner(s). Part of the storm system may have been constructed as part of the One Renton building. The City does not have plans for their construction. There appear to be no easements for the pipes on private property. Part of the 42-inch pipe runs across City ROW (S Renton Village Place). Appendix B contains some letters in the SWP-27-1269 file between the City and Renton Village Company. The letters discuss RVC's paying $60,000 for the 132-inch culvert under 1-405. The RVC letter dated April 16, 1986 mentions completing the storm drainage system through their 55 acre tract ete storm Isnstems(72 nndch pipe n plext s from ection) open ditch to the recently constructed concr Y Since the pipes are located on two private properties it appears that parts of it would be owned by RVA Center LLC and HAL Real Estate. Those entities would also be responsible for maintenance. 72-inch and 60-inch Pipes — Point C to E The storm system was built in 1982 by the Renton Village Company and plans are in the City file system (D-1269). The 60-inch pipe on the east side of the site (point D to E) was H.\File Sys\SWP-surf are Water Projects\SWP-27-Surface Water Projects(CIP)\27-2711 Renton Village\2005 CIP Pipe Rplcmt\1000 corrspd\041004 Project-Outline.doc Page 4 of 13 Silo 3LZ1 ti�Y o CITY OF RENTON ♦ .3- ♦ Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator N May 23,2006 Craig R. Koeppler RECEIVED Vice President MAY 2 5 2006 Renton Village Management Corporation 520 Pike Street, Suite 1500 CITY OF RENTON Seattle, WA 98101 UTIUTY SYSTEMS Subject: Special Utility Connection Fees Renton Village Expansion Dear Mr. Koeppler: We are in receipt of your correspondence dated May 11,2006 regarding the System Development Charges (SDC)for the Renton Village expansion project. Your questions on whether the SDC fees are correctly applied,calculated,and credited are clearly detailed. In your letter,citations from City of Renton Code were included for reference as well as a previous letter to staff on this issue. Application of SDC redevelopment credit options to this project have historically-been -- - -- complex due to the complicated utility connections and facilities on and serving the site. Besides various water and sanitary sewer mains, a sizeable storm water system conveying off-site flows through the property to the discharge point in the I-405 surface water facility, are all variously public or private. Utility staff was consulted regarding the questions and claims addressed in your letter and has determined the following conclusions: Surface Water SDC: Aerial photos,the drainage report and the AutoCAD calculations were revisited in early March. The drainage report originally submitted an area of 2.19 acres as the existing pervious surface. The Surface Water Utility maintains that the pre-developed gravel area was not impervious and is subject to the SDC when converted to pavement or roof Taking the area calculations from the aerial photos a figure of 2.29 acres was determined as existing impervious area. That figure subtracted from the post-development impervious area of 3.83 acres leaves 1.54 acres of new impervious area or 67,082 square feet. This results in a fee of $16,703.42 rather than the original calculated$18,468.83. Water SDC: The redevelopment credit was applied to the site through a calculation as mandated by City Code. Credit for a 1-inch and two 5/8-inch meters was granted with minimal proof of previous existence. The resultant fee for the expansion parcel(s)was only $37,744.82. Crediting the water SDC fees with the costs of the sewer main replacement is not allowed as the SDC fees are separately maintained by utility. Request for credit of cost of sewer main replacement: The City agrees that a nominal benefit accrued with the replacement of the main. The primary benefit was and is to the Renton Village expansion, as the previous existing main interfered with the proposed building footprints. The City participated by waiving the fees associated with the work, and allowed it to be performed in an expedited fashion to aid Renton Village in maintaining its construction schedule. 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N ®This contains 50%r AHEAD OF THE CURVE paper recycled material,30%post consumer Craig Koeppler Vice President Renton Village Management Corporation Special Utility Connection Fees May 23, 2006 Page Two Furthermore,the main had to be extended and located to provide direct service for the proposed expansion. For these reasons, staff does not recommend approaching Council for consideration for reimbursement of costs of a sewer main replacement and extension that would have been required in the course of preparing the site and serving the new buildings. Obviously, this is a very complicated site with a long history of development. I look forward to our meeting scheduled for Wednesday,June 7, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. in my office at Renton City Hall. I will also invite various City staff to join us so we can attempt to come to a mutual understanding and determine whether any negotiation space exists in the SDC code and utility determinations. Sincerely, 0 4P� Gregg Zimmerman, P.E., Administrator Planning/Building/Public Works Department GZ:Ism cc: Neil Watts,Development Services Director Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director Dave Christensen,Utility Engineering Supervisor Kayren Kittrick,Development Services Engineering Supervisor Ron Straka,Utility Engineering Supervisor KYO-S PLANNING/BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ( M E M O R A N D U M DATE: March 13, 2006 TO: Arneta Henninger, Development Services Engineering Specialist FROM: AA Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor STAFF CONTACT: Raymond van der Roest, Surface Water Utility Engineer(ext. 7392) SUBJECT: Renton Shopping Village Storm SDC In response to your memo of February 20, 2006, we have re-evaluated the historic impervious area of the Renton Shopping Village property being developed by RVA Center LLC. By studying aerial photographs from 1971-1996, we found that the pre-existing impervious area is 2.29 acres or less, which corresponds within error to the 2.19 acres from the drainage report. We calculated the area by means of AutoCAD poly-line areas that were rather on the large side. We maintain that the pre-developed gravel area was not impervious and therefore is subject to the System Development Charge (SDC) when converted to pavement or roof area. When subtracting 2.29 acres of existing impervious area from the post-developed impervious area of 3.83 acres we arrive at 1.54 acres, which is 67,082 square feet. As a result of this re-evaluation, we are adjusting the Surface Water SDC Fee to $16,703.42, based on 67,082 square feet of new impervious area. The previous Surface Water System Development Charge was calculated to be $18,468.83 for this project. cc: Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director Neil Watts,Development Services Director Kayren Kittrick,Plan Review Supervisor HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 03-Correspondence-General\Development Services\RentonV illageSDC0306.doc\RVtp ra CIO see colasC�imftml awe" •N cow a an b n ra. M Lw seat_ mv .43 r w • � .. as , II1 }.Y l t r ,e I 1 s.neii. _d ,r• z- y _ rtpp Y i � 420 y, fai /35G za •, tow �wS' l3 Y■ � i r N - +. iuu`yY It _i.r • ra fir► .6 -�►\ , i car 'v.Y 1 �k f- -^ it��� v .-kA`..� .�...' I ��` x,.. + � • � , _ r t I 1 r r IF 45 ifs 11� 3�� ��ppt,��,�t ��9 ,�'f �1.� i r _r�rll � %l SI-1 H r`��� `1• �$N�. q 1✓ 71 r I e�.. 111.11J1JJ�ILII��\ Y;� � ,1 f ���¢�`� r M'� � �'•, 1 P I �U�ja 1j ,�.�I.► J C ,JrIr 11,.�11illh►y J it �- "'�ii�-. _...� T•j;�'YET ..._. ''..: „7� � .,� ... a.. v /�1 i t ,�.�. �i'"�l �,. ,I, I Mrl t r�t�� 1.+"t+!.r * t rt\�'.5(/"` '•11\1 � ''i'�r�'�>' ����/ ,M y Renton Shopping Village Renton City Limits Parcelsi ' c. ' Renton Aerial �d SCALE 1 I ' ii a ' .00 200 0 200 400 600 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 10, 2006 TO: Ron S. Arneta Henninger FROM: X7298 O SUBJECT: RENTON VILLAGE STORM SDC INQUIRY Attached are the photos and the data from which the SDC for storm were calculated. Thank you! Cc: Kayren K. I:\memo.doc\cor 4.0 RETENTION/DETENTION ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 9 n The above analysis was used for detention and water quality sizing. The standard Rational Method was used for conveyance sizing, since the drainage basin is less than 25 acres in size. 4.4 Retention/Detention System The design storm for all hydrograph analyses is a 24-hour duration, standard SBUH Type IA rainfall distribution resolved to 10-minute time intervals. Stormshed software was used in the hydrologic analysis of this project. The detention vaults and associated control structures were sized using the following criteria: Inflow Hydrograph Release Rate 2-year/24-hour developed flow 2-year/24-hour existing flow a 10-year/24-hour developed flow 10-yr/24-hour existing flow 100-year/24-hour developed flow 100-yr/24-hour existing flow Based on soils information, the stormwater detention analysis uses hydrologic group "C" soils for the existing and proposed conditions. The existing and developed curve numbers were selected from the SCS methodology and are listed next to the 4 corresponding land condition. The SCS Curve Number chart is included in the Appendix. ' The drainage basin is 4.57 acres in size. The existing basin consists of both gravel parking and an asphalt section currently used for parking. Basin information for existing and developed conditions is found below: Existing Condition Area(acres) CN Gravel Parking 1.89 89 83 - 1, 19) 4 S(o0 = Asphalt 2.19 -z•-A 98 Landscape 0.49 86 �� 3 Developed Condition Area (acres) CN Landscape 0.74 86 Asphalt 3.83 98 The pre-developed peak rates for the target storms are: 2-year: 1.33 cfs 10-year: 2.25 cfs a W&H Pacific,Inc. 77R Renton Village—RVA Lard LLC USeattlellDatalProjectslRVA Land LLCI32272 Renton VillagelOfficelWordltir body 9-26-05.doc August 11,2005 6 r � { a �'y tttY{L . c LL ko 1,4 r• . .. ; � g Ilk ... j �'� ( t';".' � � �i � •■� �, ti. � � yip. t, '�R� ,P I'F �I ter t'• �� �' h���' �.t .§q tq 41, �. ©AEROLIST PHOTOGRAPHERS THIS PHOTO CANNOT BE COPIED SCANNED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY FORD'i> " !T WRITTEN F )F: AEROLiST HERS INC. 14001 57th AVE S,SUITE 150 SEATTLE,WA 98168 (206)246-5900 l800)852-3686 www.aerolistphoto.com WE DATE 55 � -6 -77 I s � �. x 'r•����9 � aN4°> All S. Awl u . � n � :A �� i� r�iir.u.-+Y' y ,.,Y l i Id'�I I" �' ♦ ...` ..• '' 1. . "' ,, ,'' � + I'X � r '�� M�'Ighl� Y� � I 7.'I. ✓ ^t, M e",�R, � � .�`} �- o ��Iy N h s I I,� '• . I. � ,,,lu� �,, rn Y✓� 14,, r' �x"Mn.+ 'O�Yr :n ,.av,�•' h r " �J y •Y ' ° �.,. I., � � a .-. « � ,q%� � Iql 4I� � ��w :.: " �p ` +SX.ydia"blwr. Ow � r a am . IL 711 Art L 4u. r�� 7"i� ',. 'N"�,2 �',� �M ` .•. ����. 'i i� ,w»���, .i:, a���� µ�''�w* w, �+,:, -:.,::�� ,N ": �+ �� Nor—4 Vk F c N a .,rf • �°. 4 . '�„II aa; 11� a► r,y. ,, {a „� ' R '• r r r , • � T u r . t � � I I Y ,� IMr� I�I, I : •. n I .,, w I wn , i �. n ,. � �•i�� NC y � ,. '�wll,, , � .r� 't q- w,lu�'tyh9i"4° Id " � ..:. ,r 00 r t �� I��N'� � � a " w� '4-.,.-.x., d��"' � n •`"� � ���m'°' a ;:I�.I � � � Y �ml�x X �u� � � 14 i ICI 5 xu 4 � Yr pr ., r I„ • ""� �rf c- Aerctphoto.com it CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 6,2006 TO: Ron Straka FROM: Arneta Henninger X7298 SUBJECT: RENTON VILLAGE STORM SDC Please let me know if you need any additional materials or have any questions on the memo I sent on Feb. 20, 2006. Craig Koeppler called me today and I said I would get a status report on your decision regarding the SDC storm fees. Thank you! Cc: Kayren K. Neil W. Cie lAmemo.do6cor CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 20, 2006 TO: Ron Straka FROM: Arneta Henninger X7298 SUBJECT: RENTON VILLAGE STORM SDC Background: RVA Center LLC, signed by Craig Koeppler, recently submitted a letter requesting Lots C2, C3, and C4 be exempt from the storm water connection fee. I forwarded the request to your department and Allen responded requesting permitted plans. I later met with Mr. Koeppler and he submitted the attached ALTA plan. The storm CB is highlighted (in yellow) on the drawing. The edge of asphalt is highlighted in orange. Mr. Koeppler again pointed out his discussion in the letter stating that existing catch basins are evident throughout the sites. He said that catch basins were installed both in the asphalt paved areas and in the compacted gravel surfaced areas, thus all of the areas within Lots C2, C3, and C4 are impervious. Hence the area is impervious; therefore they should not be charged storm fees. He stated that the CB's are in gravel and you don't put CB's in a pervious area. A copy of his letter is attached. Thank you! CC:Neil W. Kayren K Bmemo.dockor RVA CENTER LLC 520 Pike Street, Suite 1500 Seattle, Washington 98101 • 206.682.6868 206.682.1040 (F) RECEIVED 26 January 2006 Ty- �L'� ��p4ns��. s�� ,��� rl� /ems /�-/e �e C_ Ve,f�, JAN 3 0 2006 oJ� �)/& /�y11XIN /X-, ,hr`s',r BUILDING DIVISION Ms. Arneta Henninger City of Renton Public Works 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 r,�v✓ S�F-_ vim-S RE: Special Utility Connection Fee; Dear Ms. Henninger: We are in receipt of the City's invoice regarding Special Utility Connection Fees, associated with the expansion of Renton Village Shopping Center. Following our review of the schedule of fees, we present the comments below. System Development Charge/Special Utility Connection Fee - Storm Water Renton Village Shopping Center, including the expansion area currently under construction has been served by storm water drainage facilities since approximately 1969. For this and other reasons, we believe Lots C2, C3 and C4 (the "Sites") are exempt from the storm water connection fee. The significant points relative to our position follow: 1) City of Renton Ordinance 5169, section 2.a.ii. exempts properties developed prior to 1992 and which create no additional impervious surface area. All Sites are impervious, were developed prior to 1992, and no additional impervious surface is created by the new development. • We have aerial photos dating back to 1972 clearly showing all of Lots C2, C3 and ,�- ku I.. ,- tly n i n ,;Ious surface including s halt v"Y `ll e areas curl Gully under construction' aS a,I ImN2i rivuJ sui iace ii,viudi,iy asphalt and gravel. Typical cross sections for asphalt are 2" asphalt and 6" to 24" of crushed, compacted gravel sub-grade. Other gravel cross sections range from 12" to 24" of compacted material. The cross-sectional information is confirmed by our construction activities on-site. • A portion of the site (near Applebee's and Lot C4) was previously improved in 1969 with a Seattle Trust and Savings Bank, demolished in 1997. The bank was approximately 4,000 SF, not including paved parking areas or the paved drive-up lanes and canopy for drive-up banking. The former bank site included portions of Lots C2, C3, and C4. A stormwater drainage system existed for the purpose of removing stormwater from this improved site. A catchbasin from the former bank site remains visible just west of McDonalds, about 20 feet south of the sidewalk between our property and S Grady Way 26 January 2006 Ms. Arneta Henninger Page 2 of 3 Existing catchbasins are evident throughout the Sites, confirmed by ground inspection and by the Harstad Consultants 1998 ALTA Survey. Catchbasins were installed both in the asphalt paved areas and in the compacted gravel surfaced areas. Thus, all of the areas within Lots C2, C3, and C4 are impervious areas. • The existing shopping center was connected to S. Grady Way by vacated Lake Street and a private, paved service road running east/west between Vacated Lake Street and the parking field for the existing shopping center. The areas in reference are part of our shopping center expansion site. Multiple catchbasins are still evident in vacated Lake Street. The Harstad survey shows the location of other catchbasins, now demolished, on the expansion area. 2) Lots C2, C3 and C4 Are Served by a Private Storm Water Detention System. The System Deveiopment/Connection Fee does not apply. • Ordinance 5169 section 2.a.ii refers to "First Time Service Connection or Benefit" for properties connecting to a Renton utility system. The stormwater detention facility being constructed at Renton Village is a private system constructed by Renton Village and will not be turned over to the City of Renton upon completion, according to our discussions with the City. • According to recent City of Renton correspondence to Renton Village, the drainage ditch into which all Renton Village storm flows, is also a private system. • Ordinance 5169 section 2.d.v. refers to "Exemption Credit for Regional Improvements". Renton Village is continually impacted by offsite sources of surface water. The underground structure to be reconstructed by RVA contributes to the resolution of the regional drainage problem by routing offsite water through the underground surface water detention structure we are constructing. If for no other reason, RVA's credit under this provision for the use of its property and the redevelopment of the storm facility, would exceed the system charges and fees. The foregoing conditions support our position that the System Development Charge/Special Utility (Connection Fee other/ise authorized by ordinance 5169 do not apply to the Renton Village project. System Development Charge/Special Utility Connection Fee -Water Renton Village Shopping Center, including a portion of the area currently under construction, has been served by City of Renton water facilities since approximately 1969. We believe full relief from the water connection charges levied against C2, C3 and C4 (the "Sites") is appropriate. The significant points relative to our position follow: 1) City of Renton Ordinance 5169, section 2.a.ii. exempts properties developed prior to 1974. • Records indicate a building of 4,000 square feet, not including additional sprinklered canopy areas and irrigated landscaping areas were constructed about 1969. The building was sprinklered and was obviously connected to sanitary sewer. The building was demolished in 1997 to improve the appearance of S. Grady Way and Renton Village in general. Unfortunately, records relating • 26 January 2006 Ms. Arneta Henninger Page 3 of 3 to water service are unavailable. We do know however, that one or more portions of the site were served by a 1" water meter #40978619. We believe additional meters were on site to serve the sprinklered canopy for this building's drive- up banking lanes and to serve the irrigated landscape areas. Recently, during construction of new primary power trenches for Puget Sound Energy, just south of Grady Way, the old irrigation lines were uncovered and demolished. • Provisions exist within the Ordinance for pro rating water connection charges based on meter sizes. Although meter information is not available in our records we believe at least three meters were on the site —the 1"meter referenced above and at least two other irrigation meters. Any partial credits, the result of pro rating meter sizes, should be credited to the account of the new Renton Village building, not the accounts of Wells Fargo, Applebee's or Discount Tire, our ground lease tenants. 2) More importantly, the owners of Renton Village appeal to the City of Renton for full relief from the water connection fee for the following reasons: • In May 2005, Renton Village replaced at its cost ($184,000), approximately 700 lineal feet of failing underground sanitary sewer line. Ownership of that sanitary line clearly rests with the City of Renton. Renton Village undertook the replacement and relocation of that sanitary line because: • our need was immediate • we experienced frequent failures of the line due to blockage and cracked pipe, evidenced by in-line video camera on multiple occasions • the City's capital improvement budget could not accommodate reconstruction within the time frame necessary to support our development • timing, in terms of weather was better suited to reconstruction in May 2005 than construction of that line concurrent with our new development. Summary Again, Renton Village seeks full relief from system development/connection charges. In addition, we seek City of Renton's contribution to construction costs incurred by Renton Village for the replacement of the City owned sanitary sewer line, discussed immediately above. We believe relief from the system development/connection charges is warranted under the provisions of Ordinance 5169, and we also believe the City's participation in the replacement of a City owned utility is appropriate. We respectfully request the City's full consideration of our request. We look forward to meeting with you to discuss our position. Sincerely, RVA LA D LC Craig R. Koeppler Creative Solutions...Superior Service PACIFIC 3350 Monte Villa Parkway (425)9514800 Bothell,Washington 98021 •Planning u ying _''�-`_r Fax(425)951-4808 •E g i g Landscape Design n ineer•n w t T _. r � r ; J. �rJ. �/ r a F ...A • E . p�..��+ T f t i Li t t.._+ 1 1 I L.J. _ _ ,. _�. I ! . •_ _ {- i"" E T 1 F f r r { } _ i - Sf ff F � r r I r. - J. { - : -{- -r f '-' ✓..{.. 1 r i-i'-{ E- + I }((• , i f-- ..-# E- �_�.,; 7 i11 4.4 _ I f � I �1 _ �-.... }� _ tt j f 41 r-.t._+-�} 1- r , { f ILL ..._. .r..+ ( T tt r T r.) } I -r -L -t t,.r e. .. -.-ice •' ! Tj , ,.. .`_ ..t. ..._.; ._« i._. : 4 , t ' ]' F i } t ti. t ' : !j { , r - I- .__ I '...t_ j F f... - t_tr.' _t '.. - -t--- - f 11 I } j ! r t `._t_'i' .._..r, y f.-_ 1.,..E_. ...r -. .f.. I i E Y. ..Jam- # n- i_> f z !t E t E + .; } t -i-' �.1.. ...?...E } I.- r .r..{ .i- r.} - t } -�_-i �. -.t..i -r-f--t-r +- I T t. -t -- ---+ J c rp VIE. J iIjt x a I # { T . t r i.."'ttt - - , } + y II 7 ' Fr i i. r } Ll _r �. t - i' fir .. t , * I t ._} + '_ .t I - L L.( t { t I i (3G '74.j_ ..i �.. F... .F --_4 4, , #-`- 4 iI ? � . 4L -4.. }- __f_ _'r.((' ..I r t- -r-t ...i _ y,�.t •} T. 3._. ' t I -(` 1 E-..r._ .r .L.�. l-'---+:,•-�-f` }. .. _ j -} r_ .. -r .( -1- t '__ y 3 {• t-(-,( r r._ i .. T_ _ .. I .T_„_. _ } } '_ i .. r '- t' [ t ' + ' - I . r f t"!-� �JILt t f�E r t f i-, f t t F `# } r i 4- I� t ' ' { } j r { r ?..r d`} Ar rlj y- - t"t i i .}. f T_ .r... JLA t ( 3 3 .# f I L. r f r - r i Er # � F rs... t4 r-i t I. f 1 } 1 E 4 .i.x 4. tftri,f + t _ GIL 4 } i r .;_ .t 1 . ;_ + C J-}. 7 t T. a- f } r � r .r.. t i } f t t +. r I r €{j{jjjjj id ' � 7 , , I Date: Qhn f Nn -4r i PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW #2005- ;'c-VI�b V DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ❑ PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ❑ OTHER � APPLICANT: y � V� � • RECEIVED FROM JOB ADDRESS: 55 5 WO# 7�4ZWt` u (date) JW6S NATURE OF WORK: C_ GREEN# ❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: ❑ LEGAL DESCRIPTION SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED ❑ SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑ VICINITY MAP ❑ NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE ❑ OTHER ❑ VESTED ❑ NOT VESTED ❑ This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# dated ❑ PARENT PID#(subject to change)_ SUBJECT PROPERTY PID# 112 M5— =9 I d2 v� ❑ King Co.Tax Acct#(new) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit application.The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement ( vt) WATER Latecomer Agreement ( vt)WASTEWATER Latecomer Agreement( vt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER Joint Use Agreement(METRO) Local Improvement District Traffic Benefit Zones 75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE ❑ Pd Prev. ❑ Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residential $1,525/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$1220/unit in park Apartment, Condo$915/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.213/sq. ft. of property(not less than$1525.00)X 9 q Id, 11213 Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter(2,800 GPM threshold) STEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER SR Pd Prev. ❑ Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) ❑ Never Pd Single family residential dwelling unit $900/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit$720/unit x Apartment, Condo$540/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial, $0.126/sq. ft. of property.(not less than$900.00) ' : x _ Doe�NOT Apply ❑ rvfay Apply SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER ❑ Pd Prev. ❑ Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) IV Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$715/unit x All other properties $0.249/sq ft of new impervious area of property x � �( (not less than $715.00) P `Y ( � � RELIMINARY TOTAL $ Z N O P� O Jaof Reviewing Authority DATE ry to * If subject property is within an LID, it is developer's responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. n m ** If an additional water meter(or hydrant) is being installed for fire protection or an additional water meter is being installed for private P. landscape irrigation, please advise as above fees may change. s 7 0 7�y EFFECTIVE: January 1, 2005 \�1 V Impervious - Existing 52,820 16,489 24,011 Pervious - Existing 47,436 42,236 16,615 Total - Existing 100,256 58,725 40,626 Impervious - Proposed 84,876 47,340 35,276 Pervious - Proposed 15,380 11,385 5,350 Total - Proposed 100,256 58,725 40,626 New Impervious 32,056 30,851 11,265 74,172 (Proposed-Existing) CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: October 13, 2005 TO: Raymond FROM: Arneta Henninger X7298 4A-1 SUBJECT: RENTON VILLAGE DRAW 3227 Attached and hand delivered for your permanent records is the storm drainage report for the above project. Thank you! Please call if you have any questions. cc: Kayren Kittrick l � z° 3 y /716 � v Bmemo.doc\cor PROJECT REQUEST FORM PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: a, o 5 CONTACT: _I EXT. FILE STATUS ❑ NEW OR ❑ EXISTING: FILE CODE(m-xx-xxxx): LOCATION 1 ❑ My Work Space: ❑ File Bay Shelf#: ❑ Other: PROJECT NAME/FILE TITLE: I/ 1 /111�� - (70 characters ) DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: t- - �J2 oc-�1,�, 01 A) C UTILITY PERMIT# LUA# /---" WO# 3 ADDRESS/STREET NAME(S): ' w DEV: ; CNTR: ; OWN: ; CNSLT/ENG: OTHER ALIASES: Circle Size of Waterline: 8" 10" 12" Circle One: New/Replace/Extension Circle Size of Sewerline: 10" 12" Circle One: �/Replace/Extension Circle Size of Stormline: 12" 18" 24" Circle One New/Replace/Extension CHECK EACH DISCIPLINE INVOLVED IN PROJECT Ltr Drwg #of sheets ❑ TED ❑ ❑ (off site improvements) (include TESC) ❑ TRO ❑ ❑ (Signalization,Channelization,Lighting) 1 L (sanitary sewer main,include basin name) WTR ❑ /` �lJ (Mains,Valves,Hydrants) (inc.composite&HorizontalCtrl) ❑ SWP ❑ ❑ (CIP onlyxinclude basin name) ❑ PLR (For Developer Files Only) ❑ (letter only) PLEASE CIRCLE THE DISCIPLINES WHICH NEED TO SIGN MYLARS WATER WASTEWATER SURFACE WATER TRANSPORTATION FIRE FOR FILE MAINTAINANCE USE ONLY File Codes File Alias Date Entered and Labels Made r S —W7— 3 e! I I i T I T L R E P L R T Q T LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1. NUMBER aF PARSING STALLS LEGEND ! I FULL RELIANCE HAS BEEN PLACED IN THE TITLE REPORT PREPARED BY . SUBJECT TO PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT INCLLiDNti idATs:a DESCRIBED IN , r T 470 REGULAR PARKING STALLS CB- CATCH BASIN T INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING N0. $706091484 AND IS DISCLOSED 25 SUBJECT TO C�ENANT NOT =0 COMPETE AGREEMENT BETWEEN RENTON LOT C OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO 041-88, ACCORQING TO LOT LINE ST MH- STORM MANHOLE ,RANSN0. 19 TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, TITLE ORDER Nd. 867247 DATEQ ,, VILLAGE AND NtCDONALD S DESCRIBED ZN INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING ADJUSTMENT RECORDEfl UNDER KING COUNTY RECORD"NG Nd. 8911139006: DULY 30. l998. FOR LAND DESCAIPTIdN AND ENCUMBRANCES RECORD ON THIS SURVEY- (PARAGRAPH 161 Q N0. 96l031bf 4 AND IS DISCLOSED ON THIS SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH 27) SSMH- SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NO FURTHER SEARCH INTO THE RECORD WAS REUESTED OR PERFORMED. THE T T' T r T 14 VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS � � , FdLLOWING NOTES PERTAIN TO THOSE ENCUMBRANCES AS DISCLOSED BY SCHEQULc 15 SUBJECT TO EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM DESCRIBED IN SITUATE .N THE CITY QF RENTON, COUN; Y OF K.Na SATE QF wASHIti1G,ON CQ- ..L_AN0!✓T 2fi. THE RECORD {}F SURVEY SHOWN IN INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING 'C SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS OF SAID REPORT. INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDIN& NO. 8T08100374 ANO IS DISCLOSED ON N0. 95U5l79fl05 STATES THAT IT IS "NOT THE INTENT dF THIS SURVEY GIT- GREASE INTERCEPTGR TANK E. PARAGRAPHS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 PERTAIN TO REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, GENERAL THIS SURVEY. A PORTION OF EASEMENT WAS MODIFIED BY INSTRUMENT TQ SHOW ALL EASEMENTS dF RECORD. ' Sd NOTHING FROM THIS SURVEY WAS 17 HANDICAPPED PARKING STALLS FH- FIRE HYDRANT 'AXES, SPECIAL TAXES AND CONSERVATION (CON) SERVICE CHARGE. DESCRIBED AS "PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT` UNDER RECORDING DISCLOSED. (PARAGRAPH 28' WV- WATER VALVE N0. 9d07090637 AND I5 NOT LOCATED ON SUBJECT PROPERTY ANo Is NdT THE NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS WAS DETERMINED BY COUNTING WMH- WATER MANHOLE ?. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THE RIGHT TO ERECT, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, REBUILD, DISCLOSED ON THIS SURVEY (PARAGRAPH 17) 27. SUBJECT ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS. THE STALLS WITHIN LOT "C" . IF 50� OF THE STALL LIES FNC- FIRE HOSE CONNECTION OPERATE, AND PATROL ONE OR MORE TRANSMISSION LINES AND APPURTENANCES 16. SUBJECT TO EASEMENT FOR COMMUNICATION LINES (TELEPHONE) DESCRIBED EASEMENTS. OR OTHER SERVITUDES DISCLOSED BY UNRECORDED SHORT WITHIN LOT "C", THE STALL WAS COUNTED, WM- WATER METER OVER, UPON, UNDER, AND ACROSS PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED 1 PLAT BEING JOB NO. 97038 DF HAASTAQ CONSULTANTS: THE ABOVE IF IN INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING N0. 8708200375 AND IS DISCLOSED PI°�- POST ZNDICATOR VALVE IN INSTRUMENTS UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NOS. 3363692, 3158541, 3l65254, LIES WZTHI1�t SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE DISCLOSED ON THIS SURYEY. { 3i7651.4, 3196045, 3171112, USOC 90. AND MODIFIED BY INSTRUMENTS UNDER vN THIS SURYEY (PARAGRAPH 18) (PARAGRAPH 29) DCV- DETECTOR CHECK VALVE 'VAULT I AUDITORS FILE NOS. 3664559 ANO 36645&0 ANO RECORDING NO. 72l0300i17 FVLT- CONCRETE FIRE VAULT AND ARE DISCLOSED QN THIS SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH 5) i? SUBJECT TQ AN EASEMENT ANO RECIPROCAL PARKING EASEMENT OVER 28. SUBJECT TO QE€0 OF TRUST, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND FIXTURE FILLING THE ENTIRE PROPERTY AND ADDITIONAL PROPERTY WEST OF SUBJECT MCP- METAL LIGHT POLE WITH ALIGNMENT OF LEASES b RENTS OVER THE ENTIRE PROPERTY AND 4. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO GUY WIRE TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT DESCRIBED PROPERTY DESCRIBED ZN INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING Nd. 8708210528 SUBJECT TO PARTIAL RELEASE TO RECONYEY A PORTION dF SAID PROPERTY ' L B- UNDERGROUND LIGHT JUNCTION BOX IN INSTRUMENT UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE N0. 33446fi0 AND IS DISCLOSED ON '+.HIS (PARAGRAPH 19) DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING N0. 95i2281784 WHICH I5 T9- LINDERGRQUNd TRAFFIC JUNCTION BC}X SURYEY (PARAGRAPH 6) i8. SUBJECT TO A NON-EXCLUSIVE ACCESS EASEMENT DESCRZ8E0 IN DISCLOSER ON THIS SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH 30) MW- GROUND WATER MONITOR CAPS 5. PROPERTY SUBJECT TRANSMISSION ANp piSTRIBUTION LINE RESERVATION OP EASEMENT INSTRUMENT UNOEA RECORDING N0. 8911l70364 ANO IS DISCLOSED ()[v 29. SUBJECT TO MEMORANDUM OF LEASE DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING TV- TELEPHONE VAULT DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE Nd. 5674305 ANO IS DISCLOSED THIS SURVEY. THE ABOVE DESGAI6E0 EASEMENT MAS MODIFIED BY N0. 9650310B53 AND AMENDED BY INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING Nd. 9705240a15 CP- CONCRETE PAD ON THIS SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH 7) INSTRUMENT RECOROEQ UNDER RECORDING N0. 9508l50477. THE ANO IS DISCLOSED ON THIS SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH 31) " _v�'• LOCATION OF THE MODIFICATION IS ON LOT 2 OF R€NTON VILLAGE �v PV- PONFER VAULT I - 6 PROPERTY SUBJECT TO TERMS AND GONOITIONS OF STREET VACATION ORDINANCE ASSOCIATED BINDING SITE PLAN N0. BSP-026-90 WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 30. SUBJECT TO NON-OZSTURBANGE ATTORNMENT AND SU80RDINATZON AGREEMENT STT- STEEL TRANSMISSIGN TOWER t N0. 2Q5i BEING SUBJECT TO EXISTING SEWER fNSTALLaTIONS WITHIN VACATED 300 FEET WEST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND IS NOT DISCLOSED ON THIS D£SCRiBEp IN INSTRUMENT UNDER RECdROTNG N0. 96i029i520 AND IS TRV- TRANSFORMER VAULT § SHATTUCK STREET AND 9?N AVENUE SOUTH. TO THE BEST QF HARSTAD CONSULTANTS SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH 20) T rp �t� TJB` TELEPHONE JUNGT ION BCX $ KNOWLEDGE, ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINES WITHIN SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE O.SCLOSED Oti THIS SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH 32) � P� ! SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. AND ORDINANCE N0. 2051 IS NOT DISCLOSED ON THIS 19 SUBJECT TO A 14 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC �� ~�1° TP- TELEPHONE PEDESTAL j_l__i 31 . PARAGRAPHS 33 ANO 34 PERTAIN TO UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY: RIGHTS cr Z SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH 8) SYSTEM AS CONSTRUCTED, EXTENDED, OR RELOCATED: AS DESCRIBED IN OF VENDORS AND HOLDERS OF SECURITY INTERESTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY �.> / TM- TELEPHONE MANHOLE ;, � INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING N0. 93d92i1i30. THE LOCATION IS INSTALLED UPON THE LAND; AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS TO REMOVE ?RAGE �9\` PB- POWER PULL 80X { Z 3 7. PROPERTY SUBJECT Tfl A SEATTLE CITY LIGHT CROSSING PERMIT WTTNZN UNDETERMINED AS THE EASEMENT WAS NQT DEFINED ANO IS NOT DISCLOSED I m FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERMS: RIGHTS OF HOLDERS OF 5' ► �j PBX- P{}WER SWI TCH BOX A 350 FOOT WTOE CORRIpOA: THE LOCATION OF SAfO CROSSING PERMIT IS NOT ON THIS SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH 21) r / v D€FINED IN WARRANTY DEED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE N0. 5687517 AND ZS NQT VARIOUS RECORDED AND UNRECORDED FINANCING INSTRUMENTS INCLUDING F s v tG �G,- PJB- POWER JUNCTION BOX tf! ! DISCLOSED QN THIS SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH 9) 2C. SUBJECT TO DECLARATION OF COVENANT FOR FUTURE ROAQWAY DECLARATION MORTGAGES, DEEDS OF TRUST, AND FINANCING STATEMENTS, WHICH ONLY ' ' `� / PM- POWER METER AFFECT AND ENCUMBER MULTIPLE RECORDED AND UNRECORDED LEASEHOLD b I m . Q T AS OESCAIBEp IN INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING NO. 92l0290251 AND IS INTERESTS. WHICH 00 NOT PERTAIN TO MATTERS DISCLOSED BY THIS SURVEY. (, ,/ s_ :0 GV- GAS VALVE 8. PROPERTY SUBJECT Q SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT DISCLOSED ON THIS SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH 22) - l[ * C I l JNQER AUDITOR`S FILE NO. 6631804 AND PARTIALLY RELEASED AS DESCRIBED IN tta� / SP- S I ANDPTPE Q Z INSTRUMENT UNDER R€CORDING N0. 9406130334. TH£ PARTIALLY RELEASED 32. SUBJECT TQ A WATERLINE EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT UNDER AECOROZNG E s 1� J/ f' a, 1 _ } / / P¢ 2! . SUBJECT TO DECLARATION AND ASSIGNMENT OF PARKING EASEMENTS T � O ` EASEMENT AREA EXTENDS FROM THE NORTH EDG€ dF SOUTH RENTON PLACE N0. 9805080744, THIS EASEMENT HAS BEE N REPLACED @Y TF MODIFICATION OF ID*`f EPA Js' r� Q Z Z g AS DESCRIBED iN INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING N0. 9005l7l096 c dF t -_. s NORTHEASTERLY TO THE POINT APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET WEST AND 70 FEET A NEW WATERLINE EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING tcMtzct� �' `'� � CB IsFwEA z p M C AND IS DISCLOSED ON THIS 5U##vEY_ (PARAGRAPH 23) �_,,q�,S_s�s,�pN l• NP' c ' SOUTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE MOST EASTERLY BUILDING QF THE N0. 9808130339 AND IS OISCLdSED $Y THIS SURV€Y. (PARAGRAPH 35) Ws'"Q�mvs e� / I W � ;- I- Z I SUBJECT PROPERTY, THEN NORTH PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY EDGE OF 22 SUBJECT TO AN AGREEMENT REGARDING MANAGEMENT OF COMMON AREAS T -t�SdR�' p e / II ! w '' / �,11 = � Cl- SAID BUILDING, THEN NORTHEASTERLY i30 FEET TO THE END OF THE SANITARY AS DESCRIBER IN INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING N0. 900529i371. 3� SUBJECT TO A IO FOOT WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT v \pt / ! �x {j. a C Lu � C Z SEWER. THE SANITARY SERER WITHIN THIS RELEASE OF EASEMENT APPEARS THE ENTIRE SUBJECT PROPERTY TOGETHER WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY UNDER RECORDING NO. 5292273 ANO IS DISCL05EQ dN THIS SURVEY. L g i^ '; ti t Z ii .-, TO 8E ACTIVE 4Nfl IS DISCLOSED dN THIS SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH 10) TO ?HE WEST IS INCLUOEp WITF+IN SAID AGREEMENT. (PARAGRAPH 24} (PARAGRAPH 3fi) P r. rp��Y� A op `' N�nA ! W> m /( I ,r? O� PROPERTY SUBJECT ?0 WATER LINE EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT 2a. PARAGRAPH 25 DESCRI@ES THE RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EASEMENTS xOIf- ,*F',5403!A IA. m \ \ �1Q goy I 1 gON "� 11 F �!n� ¢ e111_" w FT t EXISTING, FUTURE OR POTENTIAL. FOR ACCESS, LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR, S ,.10 PC fly, C �s � • ZE j� ? , , �1 `� UNDER AUDITOR' ALE NO 66328Q5 AND IS DISCLOSEC ON THIS SURVEY. �' e i i �+ 1� 1. ,'PARAGRAPH 111 AND ALL RIGHTS OF INGRESS. EGRESS. AND REGRESS T0, FROM. AND J\ �pGpO tJp i-� '�' � c _, , - - �C'�p BETWEEN TH£ LAND ANII PRIMARY HIGHWAY N0. i (.SR 405) ANQ TALBQT . ,,tN - -C,' c � / a \ �� / I ¢` I / w ?C pRGPEPTY SUBJECT TO ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT ROAD SOUTH AS D£SCAI@€D UNDER AUDITOR S FILE N0. 5754046. g ! / / \ / • ! , I/'� i,� (; gF' R �- -"� JNDER RECORDING N4 8208270359 AND ZS DISCLOSED ON THIS SURVEY. TALBOT ROAD IS APPROXIMATELY 70b FEET EAST OF THE EAST LINE AND B / I j ,_ 3 `-_ -"` '.PARAGRAPH 12) SR 405 IS APPROXIMATELY 35b FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE 3 zE ` N. /- 0 1 �r, s�. "" SU$JEC7 PROPERTY RESPECT. IVELY AND ZS NOT DISCLOSED ON THIS ��-:5_ i /E p 6 <,s s 5 I Ip�P tIi• /(�/ � f- � i ; � ^_G ppM f is t L ��Q* 1 i Q P i w.J T E ZON .L ' . PROPERTY SUBJECT TC ST.7RM DRAFN SYSTEM EASEMENT Q€SCRIBED SURVEY . (PARAGRAPH 25) , i„� u! ,�� c/,� / fq r ; t Q 11 IN INSTRUMENT 1NDER RECORDING N0 861203i437 AND ZS DISCLOSED W � i _ s• .iG \ �.�. SEE NOTE i2 �. ON THIS SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH 13`) 2d. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS SET =ORTH QtV LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ctc rn S _r-._' c - /_ w F J Q�' FipE i4AIN urp NO. LLA-00!-88 RECORDED JNDER RECORDING NOS 8911!390b6 AND '9a0 / ° / " FAN= P � \ 'HYDRANT SASE NT ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL ZONE (C A I T T T ►(iY ;� �� }� /FDA ;AT" LINE \ \ flEC. NO. 86122213 S O ? Q 12. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO FIRE MaIN AND HYDRANT SYSTEM EASEMENT 9004b99d29. THE EASEMEN S LISTEQ IN SAID LOT LINE ADJUS;MEN + .r, t� '` �� 5 St T r T ; DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING N0. 8612221310 AND IS WHICH LIE WIH?IN SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE DISCLOSED ON THIGl�k t� --`.� II / , ti��� E �r 10 rtnTER`I� _ N �x HE SETBAt,K RE©ItIREMENTS FDA A ZONE :CITY DISCLOSED ON THIS SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH id) SURVEY , (PARAGRAPH 26) 8 \ Ml ti I U -` - --�� �� ORO . NOS . 4404, 4,�93 AND 4649' ARE LISTED AS FOLLOWS. *' , EtVA , ' ✓ _ 84 Jai=\ i Kt— -� C s Wa. ,�BA �� ` t~---� 13 SUBJECT TO ROADWAY AND PARKING EASEMENT QESGRZBED IN INSTRUMENT0 ` I� O S ��I518 / a5 .,'N 1' ! / ` FA ING .. s -A PE "LF' A . FRONT- STREET SETBACK: A MINIMUM SETBACK JNDER RECORDING N0 B6123iIB80 AND AMENDED ROADWAY ANC PARKING L,j P'l E r �- I / \ \ L`S • +a'8+ C T EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT UNDER RECORDING NQ. 9045161048 ( ,. r / ' � � P-r r flF EN FEET I_ REOUTREL� . HE MINIMUM SETBACK I � 1,S I ( \ =�, MAY BE REDUCED DOWN TO ZERO FEET 'p ' ' THROt,�L=~ I ANC IS DiSCi OSEV ON THIS SURVEY. (PARAGRAPH 15) 5'� / I ` ' �'. 1 BUILDING ROOF LINE ! :;°Br ` t j � ""�'' + THE SITE PLAN REVTEW PROCESS PRflViCEO THAT ! -�" `�_ i ¢ /Gg 1 t I i 10 ( BUILDING EDGE j ! ti. / Q / / � '' 1r { i BLANK WALLS ARE NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE RE�JLICED -��-''•" NGQ ;N • Q3 �O / " ` `\� —�.j `' �BiIHTINc i SETBACK . �r F q a J- 3Q 'c r /CC !► t E_G 15 t GPSE -7' 8- m4 / 0 , 'r/ , ` 1 I --- SUILc.kG { %'' tiC 6 \ © A` ,- ; / Z \ �A�1(INu\i { i i CEIGtT 15 a 1 B .. REAR AND SIDE INTERIOR SETBACKS: NONE SHALL �sJ / ^T� •� n.��� , w�L 1t; .: i , Q SE REO��RED Ex�EPT AS �IS i ED IN SPEL�a_ REOUIREME,� . S E r _ tE 0) % z '1 \ \ JJ M 1 PROVISIONS E �� s` �4 `\ `C ; ( ! BELGW IN SUBSECTION r01C - ' / �-.0 M� i;' H ✓,- 9•5> �` 4i'^ •tl N/ ' �� s t t' ..\ ,\\ STl'`S \ \ f 1 3c r W O wN d , '��' PO,��� s1EA 4 • '' �1�0iSeM\.\/` .. \�-'\I' �` j�s 4 �1 'b `. , �� i \ ti ',F'\ \i f ! Ii 7� a �/ I Q C SPE IAL RE©L,IREMENTS: IF A CA LOT ABt.i?•S OR IS _ ri q 3 /e A - `n.. 6 6u. r — 'r"' a / i, _ � . LL C*� i T 1 /QA a S y r Rr.Pi;u Vae ° 8., �- 1 nj �> > o i uLo >E ( r ADJACEN- c a _OT ZONED R- 1, R-5, R-B, R-10, R-14 Q N i+ 0R R, i FtEty TktERE S AL r- / 1 t v c+ + ; e Z t M- I . E ,, { z T 1 T Z 6� H BE A FIF T EEN FOOT (15 , + �� J - �EP"0"E c8 _ ` t �'i+ 'v �, qI <� . ~_j``` = I ' SETBACK TyE SITE ADJACENT ZflNTNG IS T 1 oe gQ ,G Pouf — sTai. sE cc``_`�' �f si 1 s } I,� o -_ rJ 5O TH S - `" I 'rt \PA NG \ \ { S M2 . . Wes; 1Zy '�.� <� ! DOES NOT APP` �1 Y i , ', r 4 Z • Uf f i w. 1 t V I , ;' I p�. — -.._ __ .._.�_.. M... --� � JL±i ,�U Z�r t} \ \ / L� `t J ( [3 ' - c��-- z . I �,. Y c IV v Y 'fc i LB ExTRUDEO CURB \ \ S7A LS ' ' x " Q t ` ;/� a -SING - w & qj'j i i! : \ �� tQy o Z .D I r TrE BOILDINGS APPEAR TG BE I`�I COMPLIANCE WITH SETBACK {C t Jy 1y GOR4 ,, a y \ F t Li i_ I 2 H. G,-6fi I b _.-k / ¢ 1 .� + n i PA. IN \ s Ls ! z `" )COY REGi:�IREMENT ASSUMING ER SGUTH SIDE OF THE TNRIF?WAY rJ v ' c o' MCDOiVALD'S E' IX g U`' \\ \(I�` \ \ T \ {{ Ir`rt -- • "_- 9 y I C T:� Q i �1 n,W T 1N '_�-�_ -,%* -$ T Q 5 P EASEMEN' 10' i ` _ CI ate - , <'�. II ,i- G► ` \ \ \ `. It # z n 3 S �T R Q r t I F at'�: * WLfl 2 ,-'/ R { y1Pg I _ a n r E '�In h g�cc ;� RESTAURANT ] ; %° �`) ( ¢ jilm{ N Q ,av ■ , 0 E IS A REAR SE . BACK i S p 4 '\ C Ge / �� r f T t i SETBACK AREA ---- C �7'-�', g + 3� , • r�►a i i� `��4 1I, r o` P Z ° 4L - { '4 r°' -- 4 /t5` ' / ,� Oh-B' 15 DING t , , o ;_, m ( I : -4 %% o� �� NO. 95.03.0854 BUILDING ! � � � ., � A I; a +.- Q/ �;� E � �e� / R C. < SEE NOTE 25 � P.Y 1 Sw U^: ; t tf +�� o< _� �` � I - .r, K '.Q WF..P ( / 0 / ,••( T 'fr I i_ v i t. o # ! I 1 '� i.9' ",yy u: r` `1 Cfi t / ( { FX.. I r =- Its ' '� c� �t \ f ( 1 cbv I "' T 1. ;NrG M C@ /I f r — / �/ / --t- -T' ---- --- i-- I--'ti — --- �AER 1 B t B P K �`\\ �; 4 i�� f 1 i _/,- OPaflX �. �_ �( t Q �_ P c t $IbE`C pTj � cc C / Q B 8' STORM 0 \\ Iit \ ST LS �B j f/s..� `\ f I � w� - I !� - c aP `l fl _ ` ( / / �``` i {i jl 6`pppoX• C a GB' I ❑ SEkER 1❑ 1 11 ,: - r i ., C Y ,.� -- \ \a� 34 1 tY, j _l` 1 / 1 �' �` l� _ !< ,tm �"' •C0� Q NLP %,ffQ P \ \ 1 o I I ; t m u ` )• 2" �o 1 / m i ":.cr+CA£F ' \ \ {R NG \ \' AS \ `\ !! f { 4 "' '� I e-^ i /` \,"' \� '� '� ti i �tlIt I s ORIYEMA X m i t , �� �� I Bie, I I i / / S 0 I� U -.... m r TRASH i I 1•�- LL 3 MO'`) r — ;---ACCESS- + % it ��i, I j �y��4E *�i4p'� f1� ' " xcaL R►c'DA i J; `1 ; � Q io 1 F 0j'�D E i EASEMENT t NOk-EKC:JSivL ACCESS EASEMEN' t i �' R �/,gs } p I x_-- { C if -p ii ! ! f 8 �� a as GB ;' OOC yiP ENC OSUAE,i a <ix { i I 1 '~ < i E i ww '' ?t.1 '� t EXHIBIT .C. ! _XyIBx' '�F 1 S TS / �%�� 3 t1 ... ( � X Z �a�i ; i '?"1 s TRY? i ({ { W I REC ^+G. i? C / qF* C8 / i ! ! w I F UA i { R£C NO 8G1 -C364 ( n j ( I I 1 r! \ � !' t r - ttt { ( SEE F1DTE fs SEE "+GTE :9 tt ' t ` \�\.C.OC'C h,�qc .�- ` l �� wV fl FA I�fG i /////,�i ¢ .\ �\ P KI�� \\ \`.\ST)h,LS \� T , \\ �j i I ! f f ;\ WN * ` ~ i f P 1 t t ! F G\ F�a�Ge fq 't' E - I ! -,-- i iS A j S i' f \\ \ i �� 1; A G� i < i t + /--- -_ T J / �� pO Al \F I;a03 N ! '`� I ! J ,i i i N \ ,'1, i 'SIDE f `:BEMER i \ r 6- / S i ` I i l I z �I �;/ — -� �( \R s\ \ � i {� X' N 8 9 '2 8 ' 13"E ' 14 4 . C9 \\ \P NZ \�\L- 0 1 I t I 1 C() �� `g s' SEE ATE 12 I o \ f `� �� I I " I i I \ \1 `, \ \. \ \^�! mf ° t - FZAE M4:N ;tlC I JJ III f 1 1I � Ct� j, \\ G Nj i �I 1 fMLP -Q I i �� ZI - fv I \ I u: .Z�i 1J �-� Gin \ I 13 $YDRAN EASEMENT` �-, � �{ W 1��c / ( FLooD zoNE x I REC Ie221_ m / - 11 i �"'s ! I vowE? I#5EmEN?..; t *� r�` I (\{ -- x- ! , ,j r. It ` i 1 p fir- 86 :r, 0 r{ / nE N @ 081003?4 NO 'F � ! tC a.i I - G y I t�I I I yt "" LL 9'0, C' �t cti r- / . I << :� s; \. \ cv SEE GENERAL NOTE 6 ;s + ; � 1- ; t W of F \ Q `� I i i+{ I! m , I 4y Oe F4 '` ( ` 1 In \ =`m �, I x1 �- !' �I I `-I I� I 0001 � i j { I / (1 ' /, ,\ 3>S �Ec�r� �� �', a \ tit I I s a i--- Ku ' ' Tp: , i t-- SEE NdTE �' ± ,, m / "` ( i ill III I �Z ,` .1 � \ \\ 1,., t \\ �. \ _ \`� \ \ I` i ` - HATER LINE t' - _ i ~ (� 18 / I� x , v i ;+I �4�. \ Pa ING\ 4 ' \ \\ ST LS \ CB f_ Pk IN \ STA LS i P Y. - j SURVEYOR S CERTIFICATE W NON-EXCLUSIVE - i w ✓� o `^ LL j z 12' STORM LB �( ' ! ; I I G EA F T It �, i I w _ �� U 4 PARK-N 1 11 /e/, - o ` ! t \ c� o :a g \ 0 1 i T , �cAErE g �- t SEM .N J 1 IR / F o� P o 3. !�+ _1 ` * f r+ \ \ !,� SEKER Cg p � SLAB / I T T r Y T T = „ �a to o ��� v I F-1 2' p m PA I14 ' \ T `- w P 1 5 LS F I 4 k HE UNQERSZGNED, BEING A REG.STERED SERVE QA OF HE STATE Of WASHING,QN, CERTIFIES TO (i) Q O E,<HIBIT E" ;� e,-, r- 1 k� iU 0 \ \ \ \ \ q I 1 + r T-AL> L.P.. A D€LAwARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, (ii) W —REC . ►'0. 8911 7 { � rL00D ONE Af 1 xi . I -'I Q f W � I �e */ } a +I , AMRESGO CAP. t1 X Z ! i �� a ! TRANSNATIdN TITLE INSURANCE ANY AND (1 I i) RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES AS FOLLOWS: 1 0364 I � , / .p Q f' 2 , i tJ1 o _ �'�. I I I ! CB \ \ H /� g {� i; w SEE GENE L NOTE 6 �� t4 irr rn X `� W ! L 0 T _ $ n Ij ► 1 Q 4 ,� iw � 1 — 4 (� y qq / 1 . THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE C� I !! r{ I Q 1 ,T{ !! �T o �q . ,�' I Q I _ ^���e i z MINIMUM STANDARD D€TAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR aLTA/A.CSM LAND TITLE SURVEYS, W i, f � !P ; x It i �� LL, �j )lay = j ITV OF RENTON LOT �` NE ` Iu EI tt; r E /� f i 11 JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND AOOPTEe BY THE AMEflICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION AND THE . /^ ( n: l o' I " F- Qj> &r _ I LL1 t` I 1 I ; L j . [ AMERICaN CONGRESS Qf� SURVEYING ANC MAPPING IN 1997 AND MEETS THE ACCURACY !' / ----may m I C ? p j ApJ SST LENT 0 . 1 \88\ ; �' I i -, 1 / I !00 GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=40 REOUZREMENTS FOR AN JR$AN SURVEY. AS DEFINED THEREIN. CURRENT STATE STANDARDS AND I T T TPA " EASEMEti? ( 4 r, i �`0 o Q \\ \ \ \ 9 o � \ ; Z z \ PA I I II caN; i i ! SPEC IFTCAT F TA A ITEMS 4 7 SEATTLE CITY __GH: { ��` - <L \ ARK `; \ \ N (� G S Ls L� ;yu Jm .:�� IONS OR 8LE I E S 1, 2, 3, , 6, (a, AND (C , B. 9, !0, 11 AND 13 OF I = f `HE AL A/AGSM SURVEYMENTS `2997 . y. { R q Itv 'vC 4 '�:U Lf y^cc ^T j i ( i ;n ! I _ \ \ \ N Y�I ; f wN T ) I ECu D G 5 . 35E 559 356'S6v^ �' 7 A'� '2:0.�Di, 18 ! �' . \ \ \ \ 5T i.S \ Q ( , � /`� m J a SEE NOTE 3 f, sue_ '� • E _ ` t / s , ► ` \ \. \ \ r_ W P R NrG sTA s t j�' GAARSASEE ` I Q' 'ttcn 0 40 a0 120 i 2 'HE SURVEY WAS MADE dN THE GROUND ON SEPTEMBER ib, 1997 ANp FIELD CHECKED DULY 13, 1998 M a ! iZ \ \ z \\ \ �\ _,A 0 Z \ i 4� l ': coFwAcT�i, ; i ! <w AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ZS A TRIjE REPRESENTATION flF THE SITE, BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPER- — -- -'- — — �' i GB ``' \ <- \ \ `\ ', \�• LLs\ \ v w z , �++' i i (� Nw ISION AND CORRECTLY SHOWS THE QESLPIPTIQN AND THE LAND AREA OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE .4 t; < ' ++. 11 � '\ il- O cb ! ¢z ttf ! 1 ! II o `�u� LOCATION AND TYPE QF ALL BUILDINGS STRUCTURES ANO OTHER IMPRdVEMENTS tNNCLUDING \ SEE wo-E :s N89 '28 - ° ' `� I I ` i U) ' •^L f� � } ! I O �a.. m aSv I i SIDEWALKS, CURBS, PARKING AREAS AND SPACES AND FENCES) SITUATED ON THE SUBJECT = �; \ 15 WIDE POWER. EASEME!vT-- * '�T I i ASa�AIT ` i a ROADWAY 11 m I Zc, ��i --.1 I�j ,� i>- j I" >" T, � O � �-I 1 f i = / .. w �7 v I , � �/ �- ! HORIZONTAL DATUM: } PROPERTY, AND ANY OTHER MATTERS SI SATED ON THE SU$JEC? PROPERTY. AEC No 970800374 --\ 7 - ate, + �' 1 i i I , _ ( �c . a Ln c ❑ FLOOD LONE X : I /5` Q r 1 I ,. 9 �\ '�1 f °' f '� ; _ s wEa c8 ca ! w { , -K sO� = i Q c r !E I 1 \ --�— / ' ^ �` `� , 5'c x �' a_ to c SEE GENERAL NOTE 61� i I 6 �� i ; 4 3. EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY, T►�ERE ARE Nn .ISIBLE EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF wAY — C8 . •; __..i I ., -,�- \ i a I., -; CI ; 5 I �; ( ti , r ,� t nF � WEP F - FdER i \ \ i Q t iL v t z WHICH THE L.NDEPSIGNED HAS B£EN ADVISED PC 6 E`E e _ ` =s-- -t I 1 3 [ `Bc�7 1 I,` `\ \ s'� _s\'\ �l \ \ \ i ` I Z KIVt: �iUN ! •� E` iAL S{ �RVEY - f _._ `E/ ¢ Nip,. ;�`\ \_\ z I X''., 't \.\ \ \PA [�,\ \STAL S \% "�! g T �`,Z, D I i = ` / �1G. •` .PAt�'*F: u. } 8` STQQV 'B :6 \ \ i 1 i i ' ( i 4. EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON 'HE SURVEY. THERE ARE NO PARTY WALLS ANC NO OBSERVABLE. ABOVE - � . n iy \ rp, \ \ ; \ ! < N R T V 'H MP V M T T ' Y I 15 x . o N � n +;e \ `\ �.8 1 CB SEWER ❑ �Q ( z,I ! w 3 GROU C ENC QACHMEN S (e) B, E I RO E .EN 5 QN .HE SUBJEC . PROPERT. UPON 40JQINZNG �� I I o t \ ( U c I ` f s T T r l° AL:.a \ i PROPERTIES, STREETS. ALLEYS. EASEMEN,S, OF RIGHTS OF WAY. OR (b1 BY THE IMPROVEMENTS S \. 1 1 ; �� q %�>F \ RKI' z c i \ \ i �l4 T ( 2 m I I I i ON ANY ADJOINING PRdPERTIES. STREETS. OR ALLEYS UPON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY / ' > - �I t 4 B'�r�f,s I \ \ \ \ I \\ \ PA ING \ s �5�, I t, j * c,,.., { I \ Ij ?�- --',} �' I f i m 4z I I !F~,, ,� \ Geld i T ,SEE +1C i E 2E !! t i <'v Q tG f 5 THE LOCATION OF EACH EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY, SERVITUDE, AND OTHER MATTER (ABOVE OR \ - ; *„ 1 'w ``Z' \ �3 'J4F` �`i= ELEASt `X" SIT q` I t , `'$ ' -. Utc M s BELOW GROUND) AFFEC?ING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ANO LISTED IN THE TITLE INSURANCE \ : A = CDk z ( r m i fd ,'� r--�s--- '' ,=�"- I -�- ,�, ; -m ¢`I I I ¢� W"� ` � _ yj (� ` Z c x AUDEG T T T E '1 Z J ` ,, ,- I M n-c r-- '���^ cr -w r , S I S COMMITMENT NO 867247. DATED,ED JULY 30. 1998, ISSUED BY TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE E 'I z i ? t En s'fs.\ I p r---- ?C G i ti �, ti'- _ �S:TL7G I i Z �'!i u, y. SIDE '-'Z 14 C�ae3 COMPANY WITH RESPECT TO T!sE SUBJECT PROPERTY, HAS BEEN SI#OWN DN TH£ SURVEY. TOGETHER \ z ,:,W' . .L,j u+ (( j Iy1 C Al*.l -+I I \ 1 `L \ \ t ` cnfi i "' �Ea -' O i -mot V t �1 i-1 A L {'+1 T E S riI?H APPROPRIATE RECO?DING REFERENCES. TQ TR4E EXTEN'+ THAT SUCH MATTERS CAN BE LOCATER. I ,ry? w i 3 i `n I iQ <y. `� ! P _ K .` \ vI'S \ \ ' A W i ¢ �� ` E �Lj� i / - _rnl .' :J; tl1 `F F '� % 'C� , ,C' i \ S-jy,,�S I \ \ \ ,. < I`' ar�x.k NG T., T ,.., v C T _'i \ < v �F O �S F,,,\• "T $�, r. HE ROPERT �HflwN ON THE 5URYE I.S THE . ROPERTY DESCRIBEQ ZN THAT . ITLE COMMITMENT. 1-+ e ti R \\ \ \ PaR TNG\. \ sTA LS �i�Ili , 1`- ��$ ! WORK PERFORMED IN CON.iUNC .ON Yr:'� HIS SUP�EY IiTIL.ZEL 'µE FGLLOwItvS THE T TMP T TH C P \ c9: `Z t \ I y m i i �3 t �G T'ricq! \I _r, 1 _ •�. _. \ 1 \ �' �` o J}}f ,,� Z_j ' ( i i c PALS TPM NT ^ p c i E LOCATION OF ALL 1. ROVEMEN S ON E SUBJECT R0, ERTY I5 iN ACCORD WITH MINIMUM \ ql f e I • \ \ a i ! z a EQI E AN.. PAOCEOU E. LINES, \ �, y ^ .: g• y m S AGO \ % 4. IF.,, ...Z t i I L Z to 1 ¢ < 0- ' a U1+� i K -CI ' 2i- Sop , SETBACK. SIDE YARD AND REAR YARD iNES, PROVISIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD FOR 4 '� S, X; \ ='; : � : �r '; Pew yy11 .\ \ a, I �m '0 1 .r, _ W E SJBJEC 0 E E ERENCE7 I N SUC Lc ..,MM M N F "' ( -- s ' \ - f ! T TI'R R P T- T TH T R P RTY R F H T T' rn ZT E. T \ \ \1 o I \ s \ \ \ I i i" C— sE R A T I T FT^t T T r Tr r T J < ,p f 9 , - L_$ I \ �., s ! a, �-I i i ip '#'� ` 4 i \ iv \ \ < • w NIKQN OTA� 5 A .N MA,NTA.NED C MAttiiJFA,. E 5 S EC.r:�A IONS i j \ ir' N I t + 5 \ ` i \ PA. ?Nu \ \ 3T�1(LS Y s I a6 0 C IF i, - _ #►• T T RTC T �- R 1 Y T \ `�� z', + �! \ Q .� i Nca'�Et rRNEP \ t i \ ` 1 \ \ \ \ `� I I, sue ' 3�. I iu, PER WAG-332`130'100 5 :HE SU$JEC. PRuPE AS DIREC . ACCESS :L ANQ F QM A QU_, DEDICA EQ AND ACCEPTED 4 I (( • I ! I ` I\ (r 4S <I \ 1 < W i D 1 s f� ga a *tE: 6 5 '?=0+v :3 i _ I 11 - - s PUBLIC STREET \ rr \ 4, ? . �, I Cv' OwER EASEMENT--- '� S I *' 'WP 23N: a 5E . � 1 < y o ;' 'I 31 F I t ENT F T sE �, . BSI : B. IELD TRAVERSE EXCEED NG REOuIR_M S 0 wAC-332-f30-09,. `r' C C. 87 `� t t �i f �) c 1 , I \ 7 Q O x; i RE N c� 1 ..a I T n .�• �` �V / tom. �� >' '\ �� �.. SE£ -E S�CC1374 �! , i iC i i - IS i, .T T T I„� Y t •{ T �T� a EXCEP AS SHOWN ,N 'HE SURVEY, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES +C� SERVE ANY ADJOINING -• \, f o o+ e; sAN TARP SEWER I f ~ / `t , 1 _ It 5 : �-- 2. U.ILI IES OTHER HAN T dSE S+idW�i MA. EX�S: dtv .HIS . . lE ONLY 'WCISE11 R TY F �.t Ft (' 'T� T T� TR !1 {Z I R \ J , Oo I ' ,., A \ \ A I t 91iILC IN i 1 I I .P �N i T , . IP . ^T ••, Tr n ROPER 0 . O AINAGE, U . iLI T IES. S UCTURAL SUPPOR' R ING ESS OR cGRESS � � e 1i 1 ; �� I PA' ,�v \ , � V !� I, � � T G � t „i� � �TILi , ZES W,TH vIDENLE 3F HEi :N�, aL. A'I�v 'v Z��BLE A' �tE G£�Jutav '�y y 1 i ��� � 1 I .,E 1 j _. S L 'CS ( �G '� �\ < <' 1 s < v \ s a �` 'v �A =� n .F_-.� - '' S'o —� \ _� 1 SURFACE AAE SHQwt� HEREON JNDER6ROiiND J?ILITY �OCA'IONS SHOWN ARE ,, e d � �+ 1 C9 A�kIN \ c � IT T r n I f"� �' T r I r C' I \ t i�� V' V �A•v i y H P N PR P R� F a T. T• v F , A - U I' a =x �- roan+ r-� I : - ' � APPR X'MAT N N R-R�` c 4R H, T r T 8 E RECORC DESCRI _0 �F THc SUB�E� d E Y ORMS MA HEMA ..,AL CLOSED IGURE. F' , J _ a ;L: A \ y. ; �M . �, - \ I AEA y ! d i E Q L J Dr G OUD vaNNEC� ION_ E �. . �tN aS S RAIN, I �, , / _ ___ — — — _ t2 - � ..p CE JN ILT 1 LOCATIONS, SO MAY L„1 AIN BENS R 1 �. E \ `\ E t E n' Tow, 4EL !� B.SEMEN' 1 s C I T TTy , T� T V ^'t T SENDS G I i � i \ ,' -_ - y i y SEM R vv P HER? t3C ♦ :r+ _,Y - f� 4/. / V < WV 'y -v — .-._ _._ A� \ ',. A Sr- SEE NDTE91 3.p '� y.. Y` -�� SINES BETwE._N Si�R�A„ ?. THE CJRI-lE` ' ZONING OR^IhA�v\ E JF CA IS AaTEr.aAl COMMERCIAL ZONE T�tE SU CT PR P RTY % " — -- a \ 1 I �URYES NO• SHOWN. SOME UNDDERGROUND LOCATIONS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN 1 MEETS THE URRENT ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMEN S BJE 0 E f - — — — — — — — � ._. _ _ — __ _ __ — ___ — !! — — _ _ BI_. , . T +qr ly \. �.* 18- TORM SENEa I i \ -- .� MA L t i-f f " -1 - 'AKEN FROM PUBLIC REGf1r�DS. *4ARSTAO ONSu' ?ANTS ASSIiME� NQ TA '� I ; f _i y� �� _R,\\� — - _,_; ._ — _ _ _ — — — — ___ _ _ — I t -"Et+- �L f�v— =, - kw --- FOR THE ACCURACY OF P I E S y v Y T C \ i \ / i __ w M a _ _:N c n a _ - _ G POWER I :, es Lr ., _ LiBL i C RECtDRDS 10 XCEPT A SHOWN ON T E S;JRVE , NQ PORTION ur 'H,E PRQPERT SHOWN QN riE SURVEY LIES c� �c. C8 ' ,G E -'�t�' -1I �R CIF:LE N0. 663:805-1 J SIDE IsErEA I ___ — T T -T r WITHIN A SPECIAL HAZARC AREA, AS DESCRIBED 'Oti '.HE FLOOC INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR THE / 1'rF. .1 , - \ / SEE �c:'s s A is xW i i -"i � 7 = �,z ---�--� 3 .4iE SITE IS SNCWN AS St�PvcYEG ON SEP EM$EP 10. 1997 ANC r.E�G �.HECKEC COMMUNITY IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PRPPERTYY IS LOCATED THE SURVEY CORRECTLY INDICATES ?HE I � �� � 0 �� ; � I �l � � WM E�__ r¢ a ' ON DULY i3, 1998 ZONE DESIGNATION OF ANY AREA SHOWN aS BEING WITHIN FLOOD ZONE AH AND x. / r/ \ \ \! P f�-'-- r \T' :", r' t' z_ -�—� 1 � I ,'`r° p °QM I i '*� ,/ `v RooF K >Q 1 ` 9 �e ��" sG_ � i "' / / is ' -- N Yc 4. SUBSURFACE AND ENVZadNMEN"AL CQNGiTZONS WERE NOT EXAMIN€D OR CONSIDEnEC } 'HE PARTIES LISTED AECvE AND ?HEIQ SUCCESSORS ANO ASSIGNS ARE ENTITLED '0 RELY ON THE SuavEY I O I \ \ Os '2 5�* - :�. i - E E ' I \ i <a,. I� / ` i___ _. a AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. AHD 'HIS CERTIFICATE aS BEING 'RUE .aNO ACCURATE. i / �\ \ LL-- 1?� 1N l 9:1i_CS�rG c'DGE ��g w jl \ -' M j f; a I E X U 8 7 i �CX - I,j 0 ,ti ! I \ N " -� e- ., T N F P R 4 T T N �p0~ a ,-emu ��a r ( + _ N �r z� �I / i '; I_.____-�8 5. E NUMBER 0 4 KING STA_L5 INCLUA3ES ANY POR. IQN OF A S,ALL LYING wiTrly / � 'I oA \ C �EQ sty` �y\ 1 I f 1 J 1! n ; z ( I eL _a:NG EDGE I i , i I THE BOUNQARY OF LOT C 1 . 4 �^ - � �[ Aq 5t \ t sue_ � I F; � BUILDING ILI oz v`ui ' BUILDING Rt)OF LINE wv 1 J ( � -- �` A� \ ,I �,�_o.O q \ 11 z t 1 4 ^' ?C.S "+EIGHT 20 6 ' j eta F� M a 6. FLOOD ZQt3E AH AND ZONE X WERE �ETERMZNED BY PLOTTING THE ZONE LINES .a` q G p C) 3 ` I ti; _`� p' I S T F ` O S` (> 9 SF � �, I , < c; u, I I /I a ''N D _'� FROM I HE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMEN Ai,CNCY COMMUNITY MAPS - t' \ \ �_ �sn,y� 9p <"p \ F i I n r o< \ \ \ \ \ J�` h I ;�_ . __ o- NUMBERS 53033C0328D AND 53033C0329G GATED SEP7EMBER 29, i989 t r ry �- j '�O 1 J'+- v x = -- o; s��' i PARKIN C S0 Gj O '<, l 1 11 -`� \ \ $T Ls NG SCALE BEING 1" 50G T. E ZONE LINES ARE APPAGX,MATE j /'- �!� 1'G \ \ 9 I �LG, J 1 I g Z Q n I t i' i \` \ \ P�P �� a i THE DRAW Z • , 2 l \ o C R f I \ y I ,f li i p '\ f i(__._._5, o -- T , T ,�_,_ ____ / r \ y \ 'L c� Q �,W , tr c< I � \ \, F h6 AND HAVE Nd BEEN FIELD SURVEYED FOR vERTFICATION ]EFiNITIONS FOR JEFFREY R BARS.AD \-- I \ O q I 7E 'n I 1 10 O of - Z REGISTRATION NQ 13731 /�.�� r j r' 9�✓ c i C - --�.f I.F \' y pet p j i �:.N BONE x ARE T -� p \ f f ( ZONE AH ANO TAT F R T T I P1{RF I tG ' gtAL s i \ c O I & '><" \9 '9 t !i t S a p ( ` p�. / p��1 g Q I i � ,.ZS.ED BELOW S E 0 aSH.NG On - \ S ti I pEt la`.�. ► FFdy1 Q' p 1u, j u w z j Ce �QQP / �StQJQ 40_'� I , }-- i<*;: ZONE AH \ 1 (' i \ ,� �� , � ` { ��:11: . _. THRIFT v� A Y S T R I' _ i \p 1 cy�i F y __�`� z FL000 pEPTFs OF 1 Tv 3 FEET fl:StiALLY AREAS OF PdNDING) ; BASE ( I G I \ q s�, p+9 1j I m z L.1 ' t -6 I P 0 Q� - I z '� Y FLOOD ELEVATION' DETERMINED I . \ \ F r ! �, FLOOD ZONE x Ins ,�� P <� PARK I ru I I 4T ALilS% I '9 f\ < C'+,1 \ F R 3� 2 ' & 5 �tu} �G / Q,r' ADO I 3�- , DATED: O j ; �- rlbr .r ! ff SEE GENERAL NOTE F � . N `� � ;�. ; \ i I � '� �>- ZONE X PAREAS DETERMINEC BE Qt SIDE THE 500 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. /1 ! s S�F 1 \ ( 'c i o� d0 \ lO \ li4 ' \ I B I � �O , f. / ! �( P�RKi � ��;115� \\ ST LS \ `,.\\ I -i v '��`; I SF l '�,'"� \ 1� ti PVI ( f ExTR D€D cUR6 ,9 /, r/ I _ y F �� \ \ y4r� 1°D O �� ° ►� \ 1 i i 1 I 9�r CB /' y AZ [ j I iy j- ---- - 1 (�� �' S7 \ '9 SEE *4TE 32? LANDSCAPING -l r� PA ING i TAL= `` �) :l� O Y \ l\ \ \ i — BLiLCING I ",(\ r J ��,,\ ���J,G \1r9 f I 9 i !<T aErA m 1 �'�Lr MEIGw- 24 g si'I. G — — — _ — !� C// If ' 4C O 9. 6 9� \ O. \\,t \ ��.�> � ( '+a As�eoef INEs��s�swL�.CrEs CONCRETE LL � I I \ ohs Ib ( c .` — '7` \ _'s, F\' 9 5 5`� NI £c \ �' z-Oti, `� 15 sckir n Efl AEc 2 \ 9\ �02�/ f ! / +IE ?2' STORM SEWER i N� T 9eo I g�",P , �� 17 G \. \ �` \ ��-- �°-c`,�� a'NG c k .. \ �- — �� I ST MH 45 25 T i i 25 Y�`//�� AQ v.� �i� 2C f� 9 \ \ �� -- r uFT :5 �`' J I 25" WIDE 3RAINA6E EASEMEN. r^ C1 �0 1 r,z C �+ 9 �S ........� \ \\) �C` �� Cr3NCRETE OADiNG AREA L I 7. 2 � t L-�_. # SEE',N0� ✓ i1203/437 �� I NP 45 \ r V Sic 2 S 9 \ t7 Q� O P V l `� �`p��1} j� ,a --��\ -_ " 1� !+IGN vuL*AGE / °r ( �` O l��q 7G \ y� P� �2l ' S !A DCV CONCRETE ALA COrrGR kTE — e• MATEp LI FH PIV WATER LINE TAW \ �� O' � � 1��\ ■I P I S LL \ f p tp, PV E3D l +�i ` 1 2 T _ _ — ��, � ' � — 1 i -A 'M O vERHEAO cpwEa G 0 -- l`-----�C .,� PY I /� 9 4 �� GG (, `s, \ i J. 1 t10 f WIDE WATERLINE EASEMENT C j GI7 wM cc ' AewuL, 45' WIDE EL CT IC NSMISSION LI wpp I C` FH JY i� I I S`� fK� \;\ f 10' Q P 5 —�AUD S FILE N0. 663180R :SEE NOTE 43 `fir i W I 1,PP�P VCRs c surTER 3 2 4 2 EASEMENT-REC. NO 020A270359 E NOTE :Ot �_M 3 \ Sl,_, �� i *Ps+ 'S• _41 12• rATER .i7�E — � -- — — W� m j P� G�L� G1AiB 6 GUTTER Wv FEY• i �\ 12' HATER ,iNE GY o �,W NN V O CI]I I �/� E ✓p� \ _-- _ _ I r 4 Y "`�.s-1 N.�` _ — — — -- Z• �� wv O i r i r; W SA T?Agr SEWER �(''�; f - _ _ SKH C ..� s w N 8 9 4 4 l / ASPrtALT Q �o� i R+2� -- �— --- • O 18' SANITARY SEWER .�--- i@ SANITARr SEWER SS MM 19' SA+iITAR� SEWER SS K� 19' SANI?A+7r c �- SEw�R I W I s , EASEMENT- A rF�.TE N0 6631804� 1 •� \ /I- 0 � SOUTH R E N T O N CURB o GUT L L A G E C E ; 2" GA LINE o i 61 �r �0� i I 10' RIDE SANEITARY SErEA S'0 �_ 1 i c . CONCRETE CD IC,��� IDEIMALK DRIVEWAY CONCRE' .DEWALK P �^ �1�( 1 }- J G LEPN ' — - i ___ , M:_ NL DRi'1EF+pv f� AQ �� ��' '� PLO —{ — 1 e0 A Tk n QT I � t {.� G¢ �P ti ') N Br�F�, N o I I 1 1 I i li I. tM as ��Iepl s�� a M ' SOU V �4 !� SFF 90 O" � I PA KIN P ST LL�{'� �( <_ '}' 11 ��'' P I �p� "�- i 1 ,� vo r�s 1�I e7 . s �a� w G� '� �' t 1/ �/f - Y,t,w Po / r fop �� I -1 117 ` / t �---10' wICE TELEPhdNE EASE�#ENT / PS ' O 9 �� / F ! 0 ` EC. NO. 87081003?5 11R I O0 P , A y v e P i TE i G1_ C R SEE NCT # SY �5 p /`�► 'O 0 0 ,� / 11 ,. '', II �� :2 +siG SEWER T 0 ©�AQ`10Z! 900��6 p\ \ � 5� / / / 1 (D i �0- `5 3a, Np \ \\ \ \2 �� y / �� / ' °a""' t BUIL� DI AREAS BUILDI ." ADDRESSES I , �1 1 /� �� ' \ p \ � ��o / / PP�S�' ���,�' ,�'"' / / THRIFTWAY BUILDING 30, 72® SQ . FT . T 50 1 SOUTH GRADY YAY I ( g © IHRIF # WAY . I \ ` '`', \ / . �p (° RETAI sT R 7 S PT . �ENTON, WA 98055 r ! — — — — — , \ kZ -� / �L 0 ESrJ7, B4 �G . : \ z / ,90 ,:�' p / RETAIL STORES 601 SOUTH GRADY WAY . 1 McDONALD F _�' 4 1� � S �, 7�Q SLR . : . / / f a�G' RENTON, WA 98055 10 OWW TOTAL a 4, 204 SG . i=T . ML D0 BALD 1 S 401 SOUTH GRADY WAY i �*ts RENTON WA 98055 1 C ,, ,%� , P. i I� 1 " =600 ' ± IV o- LaT AREA ; 4 _' a E_ _-�_. _'\ R_. tC �3_�CG:- 5 7 Sq 1 taS .r_ +C ' 4. R a.. L _ _ c� 609, 960 s� . FT . F ENTON F GE ASSOCIATES A-E SCAI- _ ',�+ G V-S'=L _ '!'. . "� 1 tit cY SPEC I,T•t E XCE`'I',_i(`: �^- -C�>� :?n+ i-IA T i _ i A >,.a,.- cr M tiG T RS 4D A c^^ 'v �} ^ 6 - _ r� �_ _�c� ~,� ^�ER�IFICA'IO'v 7-?1-58 �`PAkSTAD '"� ,� �� a°'. � � ' ALTA/AGSM LAND TITLE SURVEY �t 6 : ; _ _ s 4 00 A RC�� "� t4-r J.� ;;;_ T `,...^„vEv PG= p�.PI _% _ ."1Q '...s!v5`YA Oti : -y?i ,",r:.'.a.0 , l., •,?` T�- I s �> w _ �. ,C I QF RENTQN _______4__ _ _ 8 L p,DOf+�. }j4(. `(�(��( � ,. .. _.r r..:: _. ✓ .. 'i✓ArA�i C.�J ;1:1':: -?.)_.�� TYi� I Z�� \ _ ��� � .. .. .i.� •� �' Y OT L _ _ _. __ . I _ ACJUSTMENT Nt3 C?0 8S_ _-____�_ . - - _ _��--- -- � E _ _ rLk--. , , NEi/'4 SECTION 19, TWP 23N . RGE . 5 T _ _ -u --- . � — ate." /.' f .— ' _ - U D ING INDEX: CIQ 32171-4IN&C-91EPLAN a� IR9804fiACQ c 9-4 b q a o � b E a) o �, m co ° I I rn LOT Cl ~ ~ - 10 -W to� a LOT LINE 1 a � a f WAIK-IN _ H �I RESTAURANT CooURs 5, 200 SF RETAIL ' 1 9, 000 SF o 52 STALLS REQD © /100 59 PROVIDED x z � 36 STALLS REQ'D @ 4/1000 TR H 11 � � I 59 PROVIDED � z � ZE c r n J 4-0 i V � I N LOT C4 59 PARKING STALLS LOT C2 J 133 PARKING STALL >-- LOT LINE I J W - - 0 o uj DRIVE THRU Q Q o RETAIL 7, 850 SF Q - W Lu IF31 STALLS REQ D © 4 100 Z Q o 1 74 PROVIDED o CL o RETAIL Li Z C� 52000 SF ° zl Lu Q Q 20 STALLS REQ`D © 4/ o Z -�! 1 39 PROVIDED ° w 1 I As J 0- ow 1 LOT C3 1 39 PARKING STALLS ct� cn � � o I VAULT ti 0 o — _ W coCL g SCALE ur o co _p N B 30 0 15 30 60 ����e 5G' W Ln oo�N Q X � 1 � ( FEET ) 1 INCH = 30 FT a� E ~ 00, o Q CI- O U U m m Y O O PARKING AND LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS LOT C2 PARKING AND LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS FOR LOT C3 PARKING AND LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS FOR LOT C4 a: Q m w oTOTAL LOT AREA = 100,256 SF TOTAL LOT AREA = 58,725 SF TOTAL LOT AREA = 40,626 SF Q SF TOTALPERCENT BUILDING SQUARE FOOT BUILDING= 16,850 ,85016.81� TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE = 5,000 SF TOTAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE = 5,2= 2. PERCENT OF LOT COVERED BY BUILDING = 8.51% PERCENT OF LOT COVERLo ED BY BUILDING = 180% LLJ z z EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = 52,820 SF- EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = 16,489 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = 24,011 SF CL= EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA = 47,436 SF EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA = 42,236 SF EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA = 16,615 SF A ,; n , PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 84,876 SF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 47,340 SF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 35,276 SF o co m F�..r�r,,, PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA = 15,380 SF PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA = 11,385 SF PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA = 5,350 SF z z ,r n PARKING SPACE REQUIRED = 67 STALLS PARKING SPACE REQUIRED = 20 STALLS PARKING SPACE REQUIRED = 52 STALLS Q Q ' ' PARKING SPACE PROVIDED = 133 STALLS STANDARD (9'x20') PARKING SPACE PROVIDED = 39 STALLS STANDARD (9'x20') PARKING SPACE PROVIDED = 59 STALLS o o STANDARD ) J (9x20 ADA PARKING STALLS PROVIDED = 2 STALLS ADA PARKING STALLS PROVIDED = 2 STALLS ADA PARKING STALLS PROVIDED = 2 STALLS SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING = 15,380 SF SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING = 11,385 SF SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING = 5,350 SF SHEET c EX-07- 7 J 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 0 1