Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSWP273272(1) 1 � v" ca �n wot,ld b,- clh as!s i �w�d�.vice-a-. Ep�►J/t.�wC��.� erv�u�1 �K�D-St�ico.., f V Member Jurisdiction y .,y & WRIA Forum Grant Program Final Report King Conservation District Grantee: City of Renton WRIA Forum: 8 Forum (Cedar River & Lake Washington Watershed) Project Name: May Creek Action Plan Implementation Project Contact: Steve Lee, City of Renton Address: 1055 Grady Way S. City/State: Renton, WA 98057 Phone: (425) 430-7205 Final Report November 12, 2009 Date: Instructions: In narrative format, summarize the project accomplishments, successes, regional benefits, obstacles, challenges, lessons learned, and recommendations for future comparable projects. Explain how KCD was acknowledged and attach copies of web pages, newsletter articles, photos of signs, etc. to document compliance with acknowledgement requirement. • Project Accomplishments and Successes The May Creek Action Plan grant funding provided solutions to habitat enhancement planting, water quality, stream enhancement, and water resource protection as identified in the May Creek Basin Action Plan. Project accomplishments include completion of the Edmonds Avenue Outfall Project, completion of the May Creek Large Woody Debris (LWD) Placement and Riparian Plantings, and completion of the May Creek River Mile 1.9 at Jones Road Project. These projects have improved May Creek's ecological health through enhancement of habitat, improvement of water quality, and implementation of erosion control measures described within the Action Plan. The LWD and planting of conifers was implemented by the City of Renton, City of Newcastle, and King County Water and Land Resources Division with plantings and LWDs distributed throughout the riparian area in May Creek Canyon. The stabilization of slopes at the most significant erosion sites in May Creek Canyon prevents additional sediment laden runoff from filling in the stream gravels with fines. • Regional Benefits Benefits to the May Creek watershed include habitat improvements for resident and migratory fish which use the creek extensively. Coho, Chinook and sockeye salmon, as well as steelhead and cutthroat trout are all supported by the May Creek system that today still retains high quality natural resources and attributes in the basin that is worthy of protection Email:jurisdiction wria grants@kingcd.org Page 1 of 2 Mail: King Conservation District Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Grants Program 1107 SW Grady Way,Suite 130 Renton,WA 98057 and enhancement. The projects implemented by Renton was completed in addition to efforst by the City of Newcastle and King County to regionally provide water quality, habitat enhancements, and restorations for all of May Creek through an interlocal agreement implemented between all jurisdictions located within the watershed. • Obstacles and Challenges Challenges encountered throughout the successfully completed projects included planning and agreement through all jurisdictions with all shareholders contributing to the Plan's success. Cost shares were established with certain projects as well as projects being the sole responsibility of their individual jurisdiction. Billings and invoices agreement was established for joint projects with staff time recorded and logged as contributing costs. Permitting was a challenge due to work conducted in stream requiring hydraulic permits as well as temporary easements obtained in time to prevent project scheduling issues. Technical difficulties with a loose sub-layer of soils below the layer of topsoil and duff posed additional problems requiring use of alternative pipe anchoring and pipe laying methods along steep slopes for the outfall projects. • Lessons Learned and Recommendations for Future Projects The projects completed by the City of Renton provided lessons learned including scheduling longer lead times for access difficulties and easement acquisition across privately owned lands with limited available access to the project locations. In addition,the loss of multiple project managers by all jurisdictions resulted in longer project durations than originally anticipated. Recommendations for similar future projects should include continuing multi jurisdictional and multi-partner funding to continue collaboration,joint decision making and regional cooperation among jurisdictions. Partnering better provides pooled staff and funding resources to benefit all. • Acknowledgement of KCD Funding The City of Renton acknowledges that the funding provided through the transfer of the City of Renton's $1 per parcel share of the $5 per parcel King Conservation District Assessment of parcels within Renton has been usefully applied in assisting with completion of solutions to habitat enhancement planting,water quality, stream enhancement, and water resource protection projects. Acknowledgement of KCD involvement is listed within the May Creek Action Plan that has been adopted by the City of Renton. In addition, during the LWD and planting project in May Creek, KCD was acknowledged as a funding source within the King County Council presentation and to the Renton Council as a key funding source. Email:jurisdiction wria grants@kin cd.org Page 2 of 2 Mail:King Conservation District Member Jurisdiction&WRIA Forum Grants Program 1107 SW Grady Way,Suite 130 Renton,WA 98057 paTran Project Expense Transaction Detail Report Page: 1 6/16/2008 4:22PM City of Renton 1/1/2005 through 12/31/2008 Project At u65370 SW 34TH CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT Date Reference Description Account# Materials Other Function# f010 Construction Services 1/23/2008 Pay Est#9 SW 34th St Culvert Replacement E 427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.00( 1,050.40 007600 BANK OF AMERICA 1/23/2008 Pay Est#9 SW 34th St Culvert Replacement E 427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.00( 19,957.60 068487 R L ALIA COMPANY 2/21/2008 Pay Est#10 CAG 07-027 SW 34th St Culvert E 427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.00( 358.93 007600 BANK OF AMERICA 2/21/2008 Pay Est#10 SW 34th St Culvert Replacement E 427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.00( 6,819.76 068487 R L ALIA COMPANY 3/21/2008 Pay Est#11 SW 34th St Culvert Replacement E 427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.00( 3,044.51 068487 R L ALIA COMPANY 3/21/2008 Pay Est#11 R L Alia Co.CAG07-027 SW 34th E 427.000000.01&5950.0038.63.00( 160.24 007600 BANK OF AMERICA 5/13/2008 Pay Est#12/Final CAG 07-027 R.L.Alisa Co.-SW E 427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.00( 80.00 007600 BANK OF AMERICA 5/13/2008 Pay Est#12/Final SW 34th St Culvert Replacement E 427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.00( 1,520.00 068487 R L ALIA COMPANY Function Total:f010 Construction Services 0.00 32,991.44 Function# f042 Financial Activities 1/31/2008 TR08-01-008 DEC 2007 SOFT CIP E 427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.00( 737.94 1/31/2008 TR08-01-008 DEC 2007 SOFT CIP E 427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.00C 2,796.69 1/31/2008 TR08-01-008 DEC 2007 SOFT CIP R 000.000000.000.3490.0032.20.00( -737.94 1/31/2008 TR08-01-008 DEC 2007 SOFT CIP R 407.000000.000.3490.0038.30.00( -2,796.69 2/29/2008 TR08-02-007 Jan 08 Soft CIP E 427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.00( 571.64 2/29/2008 TR08-02-007 Jan 08 Soft CIP R 407.000000.000.3490.0038.30.00( -571.64 3/25/2008 TR08-03-003 February 2008 Soft CIP E 427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.00( 98.85 3/25/2008 TR08-03-003 February 2008 Soft CIP E 427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.00( 1,247.31 3/25/2008 TR08-03-003 February 2008 Soft CIP R 000.000000.000.3490.0032.20.00( -98.85 3/25/2008 TR08-03-003 February 2008 Soft CIP R 407.000000.000.3490.0038.30.00( -1,247.31 4/21/2008 TR08-04-005 March 2008 Soft CIP E 427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.00C 868.10 4/21/2008 TR08-04-005 March 2008 Soft CIP R 407.000000.000.3490.0038.30.00C -868.10 5/22/2008 TR08-05-006 April 2008 Soft CIP E 427.000000.018.5950.0038.63.00( 178.19 5/22/2008 TRO8-05-006 April 2008 Soft CIP R 407.000000.000.3490.0038.30.00( -178.19 Function Total:f042 Financial Activities 0.00 0.00 Project Total: u65370 SW 34TH CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT 0.00 32,991.44 Page: 1 revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page: 1 09/23/2008 3:31 PM City of Renton Periods: 5 through 5 05/01/2006 through 5/31/2006 427 SURFACE WATER CIP FUND Adjusted Year-to-date Prct Account Number Estimate Revenues Revenues Balance Rcvd 000000.000.3080.0000.00.000000 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3310.0097.04.065287 FEMA SPRINGBROOK FLOODPLAIN MAI 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00 000000.000.3410.0050.00.000029 SPEC&PLAN CHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3610.0011.00.000000 INVESTMENT INTEREST 19,949.00 4,869.85 19,322.91 626.09 96.86 000000.000.3690.0090.00.000018 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3820.0020.00.000000 REVENUE BOND PROCEEDS 929,051.00 0.00 0.00 929,051.00 0.00 000000.000.3870.0000.00.000000 RES EQUITY TRANS/W/S 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3870.0000.00.000001 RESIDUAL EQUITY TRANSFER IN/FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3880.0010.00.000000 LID/DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3880.0010.00.000040 SURFACE WATER CONN CHARGES 371,000.00 26,565.00 86,223.71 284,776.29 23.24 000000.000.3970.0000.00.000000 TRNSF IN/401/SPRINGBROOK SPRINGS 0.00 79,333.00 396,669.00 -396,669.00 0.00 000000.000.3970.0000.00.000100 RESIDUAL EQUITY TRANSFER FROM 4( 952,000.00 0.00 0.00 952,000.00 0.00 000000.000.3970.0000.00.000103 TRANSF IN FROM 103 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3970.0000.00.000481 TRANSFER IN FROM 481 2004 W/S BON 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3990.0000.00.000000 USE OF PRIOR YR REVENUE 1,545,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,545,000.00 0.00 000600.000.3320.0000.00.065185 REIMB ARMY CORP OF ENG/CEDAR RV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000600.000.3340.0007.00.065350 MAY CREEK BASIN PLAN IMPLEMENTA" 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000600.000.3370.0007.00.065350 KING CO CONSERVATION DISTRICT GR 13,000.00 0.00 55,084.85 -42,084.85 423.73 000600.000.3370.0007.00.065370 KING COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRI( 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000600.000.3670.0000.00.065095 LOWR CEDAR RIV SEDIMT/BOEING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000600.000.3690.0010.00.065095 SALE OF GRAVEL FIRM CEDR R DREDG 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000600.000.3830.0000.00.065095 CEDAR RIV SEC 205 FLD CNTL/KC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000600.000.3830.0004.20.065045 PWTF LOAN DCD/NE27-ABERDN STM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000600.000.3950.0020.00.065230 REIMB FROM INSURANCE FUND/FEMA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total SURFACE WATER CIP FUND 3,845,000.00 110,767.85 557,300.47 3,287,699.53 14.49 Page: 1 revstat.rpt Revenue Status Report Page: 1 09/23/2008 3:32PM City of Renton Periods: 1 through 12 01/01/2006 through 12/31/2006 427 SURFACE WATER CIP FUND Adjusted Year-to-date Prct Account Number Estimate Revenues Revenues Balance Rcvd 000000.000.3080.0000.00.000000 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3310.0097.04.065287 FEMA SPRINGBROOK FLOODPLAIN MAI 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00 000000.000.3410.0050.00.000029 SPEC&PLAN CHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3610.0011.00.000000 INVESTMENT INTEREST 19,949.00 76,439.09 76,439.09 -56,490.09 383.17 000000.000.3690.0090.00.000018 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 0.00 39,334.00 39,334.00 -39,334.00 0.00 000000.000.3820.0020.00.000000 REVENUE BOND PROCEEDS 929,051.00 0.00 0.00 929,051.00 0.00 000000.000.3870.0000.00.000000 RES EQUITY TRANS/W/S 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3870.0000.00.000001 RESIDUAL EQUITY TRANSFER IN/FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3880.0010.00.000000 LID/DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3880.0010.00.000040 SURFACE WATER CONN CHARGES 371,000.00 380,477.21 380,477.21 -9,477.21 102.55 000000.000.3970.0000.00.000000 TRNSF IN/401/SPRINGBROOK SPRINGS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3970.0000.00.000100 RESIDUAL EQUITY TRANSFER FROM 4( 981,793.00 952,000.00 952,000.00 29,793.00 96.97 000000.000.3970.0000.00.000103 TRANSF IN FROM 103 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3970.0000.00.000481 TRANSFER IN FROM 481 2004 W/S BON 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000000.000.3990.0000.00.000000 USE OF PRIOR YR REVENUE 1,545,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,545,000.00 0.00 000600.000.3320.0000.00.065185 REIMB ARMY CORP OF ENG/CEDAR RV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000600.000.3340.0007.00.065350 MAY CREEK BASIN PLAN IMPLEMENTA" 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000600.000.3370.0007.00.065350 KING CO CONSERVATION DISTRICT GR 13,000.00 55,084.85 55,084.85 -42,084.85 423.73 000600.000.3370.0007.00.065370 KING COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRI( 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000600.000.3670.0000.00.065095 LOWR CEDAR RIV SEDIMT/BOEING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000600.000.3690.0010.00.065095 SALE OF GRAVEL FRM CEDR R DREDG 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000600.000.3830.0000.00.065095 CEDAR RIV SEC 205 FLD CNTL/KC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000600.000.3830.0004.20.065045 PWTF LOAN DCD/NE27-ABERDN STM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000600.000.3950.0020.00.065230 REIMB FROM INSURANCE FUND/FEMA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total SURFACE WATER CIP FUND 3,874,793.00 1,503,335.15 1,503,335.15 2,371,457.85 38.80 Page: 1 glAlnq Account Information Page: 1 9/24/2008 8:41:25AM City of Renton Account No: R 427.000600.000.3370.0007.00.065350 Title: KING CO CONSERVATION DISTRICT GRANT Fiscal Year: 2006 Debit/Credit: C Account Class: J6 Capital Grnts & Cont-VA Budgeted: Y Year End Estimate: 0.00 Status Code: 0 Allotment: N JC Required: N Locked: N Standard Acct: Y Budget Account: Account History Year Total Budget Revenues Balance 2008 0.00 0.00 0.00 2007 13,000.00 0.00 13,000.00 2006 13,000.00 55,084.85 42,084.85- 2005 0.00 0.00 0.00 Account Activity Period Total Budget Revenues Balance 1 13,000.00 0.00 13,000.00 3 0.00 55,084.85 42,084.85- Totals : 13,000.00 55,084.85 42,084.85- Transaction Detail Period Jrnal Doc Type Doc Date Post Date Group Reference Description Amount D/C 3 GJ GJ revday 3/1/2006 3/2/2006 cr03/01/06 01-47331 KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT 55,084.85 C Budget Adjustments: 0.00 Activity: 55,084.85 Page: 1 King Conservation District 935 Powell Avenue SW,Ste.D•Renton,WA 98057•Phone(425)277-5581•Fax(425)277-5588•E-mail district@kingcd.org x11a lua September 12,2007 RECEIVED Allen Quynn SEP 1 4 2007 City of Renton CITY OF REN i ON 1055 S. Grady Way UTILITY SYSTEMS Renton,WA 98057 Dear Allen, Enclosed,for your records,is a signed Agreement for award of a King Conservation District Member Jurisdiction&WRIA Forum Grant for the Upper Springbrook Creek Restoration Project project. This grant is funded with King Conservation District Special Assessment funds allocated to the Green- Duwamish-CPS Watershed Forum. Additional enclosures include a check in the amount of$45,000.00,forms for use when submitting progress reports and expense reports,and forms for use when requesting a revision to your grant agreement. I will forward electronic copies of these forms for your records. I'd like to call attention to a number of paragraphs in the Agreement. Detailed in paragraph 2.5 are guidelines on submitting biannual financial and progress reports on the grant. Detailed in paragraphs 2.6 through 2.7 are instructions on accounting for the expenditure of the grant funds. Detailed in paragraph 2.12 are guidelines on acknowledging the District as a source of funding for the project. You will receive by email several file formats for the KCD logo to be used when recognizing the District as a contributor of funding to your project. I am available to answer any questions you may have about these requirements. Additionally,Marla Hamilton Lucas,District Financial Manager,is also available to answer questions concerning accounting and financial reporting. Please do not hesitate to contact us at any time. Sincerely, 9sica Saavedra Member Jurisdiction&WRIA Forum Grant Program Lead Enclosures (7) Cc: KCD Ref 07-174 check Itrs Stewardship Partners,City of Renton 1L6j&zDJ Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Grant Expense Report King conservation District WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: Project Contact: Address: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Instructions: Complete this form and attach accounting system reports to document expenses. Use Expense Report Detail when accounting system reports are not available and attach copies of receipts. Return electronic and hard copies. Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining TOTAL $ $ $ $ Email:jurisdiction wria grants@kingcd.org Page 1 of 2 Mail: King Conservation District Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Grants 935 Powell Ave SW Ste D Renton,WA 98057 Expense Report Detail Project Name: Report No.: Instructions: use this form when accounting system reports are not available. Attach copies of receipts for all expenses. Number each piece of documentation and note each number by budget line item in table below. It is not necessary to use this form or provide receipts when accounting system reports that include grant budget line item subtotals are provided. Budget Line Item (specify, e.g Salaries/Wages, Contracted Services): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount TOTAL $ Email: iurisdiction wria grants@kingcd.org Mail: King Conservation District, Member Jurisdiction&WRIA Forum Grants Program,935 Powell Ave SW Ste D, Renton,WA 98057 Page 2 of 2 Member Juridiction & WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report King Conservation District WRIA Forum: Project Name: G ra ntee: Attention: Address: I C City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Municipality & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: Project Name: G ra ntee: Project Contact: Address: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining TOTAL $ $ $ $ Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Member Juridiction & WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report King Conservation District WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: Attention: Ad d ress: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Municipality & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: Project Contact: Address: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining TOTAL $ $ $ $ Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Member Juridiction & WRIA Forum x Grant Progress Report King Conservation District WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: Attention: Ad d ress: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity Return to: I-ing Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Municipality & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: Project Contact: Address: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining TOTAL $ $ $ $ Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 November 29, 2007 Brandy Reed King Conservation District 935 Powell Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: SW 34TH STREET CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT BIANNUAL FINANCIAL AND PROGRESS REPORT NO.4 Dear Ms. Reed: As required under Section 2.5 of the Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grant between the City and the King Conservation District,the Municipal and WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Ex ense Report, and the Member Jurisdiction&WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report for the SW 34 Street Culvert Replacement Project for the reporting period ending November 30,2007, is enclosed. The project is substantially complete with only the installation of the guardrail,handrail,road stripping and sidewalk remaining to be completed. Please call me at 425-430-7247, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Allen Quynn, Project Manager Surface Water Utility Enclosures HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\Biannual Report 4.doc\AQmd Municipality & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: Project Contact: Address: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining TOTAL $ $ $ $ Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Municipality & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: Project Contact: Address: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining TOTAL $ $ $ $ Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Municipality & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: Project Contact: Address: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining TOTAL $ $ $ $ Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Municipality & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: Project Contact: Add ress: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining TOTAL $ $ $ $ Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Expense Report Detail Project Name: Report No.: Budget Line Item (specify, e.g. Salaries/Wages, Contracted Services): Date Payee Description Documentation' Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation' Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation' Amount TOTAL $ 'Attach copies of all receipts documenting costs. Number each piece of documentation and note each number in the applicable column. Receipts are not needed when providing accounting system documentation. It is not necessary to use this form when accounting system documents are provided that include grant budget line item subtotals. Page 2 of 2 I ix[(�j�awD Member Juridiction & WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report g p King Conservation District WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: 1--- Attention: Address: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Municipality & WRIA Forum 11( ?D Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: Project Contact: Address: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining TOTAL $ $ $ $ Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Grant I L�La=Dj Program Checklist of Grant Award Requirements King Conservation District 1-1 Submit Progress Reports using the form titled Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report for period of grant agreement bi- annually Due June 30th and November 30th of each year ❑ Submit Expense Report using the form titled Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Grant Expense Report for period of grant agreement bi- annually Due June 30th and November 30th of each year. ❑ Keep track of the project completion date, if necessary submit Amendment to extend the completion date using the form titled Grant Amendment Request Submit project documentation such as technical reports or publications as produced or upon completion of the project. Submit final narrative report using the form titled Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Grant Final Report and final expense reports upon completion of project, preferably prior to completion date CAG-07-158 AGREEMENT FOR AWARD OF KING CONSERVTION DISTRICT WRIA FORUM GRANT Green-Duwamish-CPS Watershed Forum(WRIA 9) City of Renton This Agreement is made between the King Conservation District Number 9, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 935 Powell Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 (referred to herein as "District"), and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 (referred to herein as "Recipient"), for the purposes set forth herein. SECTION 1. RECITALS- 1.1 Whereas, the District is a special purpose district organized and existing under authority of Chapter 89.08 RCW which engages in certain activities and programs to conserve natural resources, including soil and water, which activities are declared to be of special benefit to lands; and 1.2 Whereas, pursuant to RCW 89.08.400, King County has authorized and imposed a system of assessments to finance the activities and programs of the District; and 1.3 Whereas, pursuant to RCW 89.08.220, RCW 89.08.341 and/or Chapter 39.34 RCW, the District is authorized to enter into agreements with municipal entities and agencies (governmental or otherwise), or their designees, in order to carry out and facilitate the activities and programs of the District to conserve natural resources; and 1.4 Whereas, certain Watershed Forums were established by King County and through the voluntary association of agencies and entities situated within the particular watershed basins or areas (i.e., Snoqualmie Watershed Forum; Cedar/Lake Washington/Sammamish Watershed Forum; Green/Duwamish/Central Puget Sound Watershed Forum) for the purpose of addressing and responding to environmental needs within their respective watershed basins and in the region by cooperative efforts; and 1.5 Whereas, the Watershed Forums include representatives of jurisdictions that are located within or have a major interest in the management of Water Resources Inventory Areas (WRIA) 7, 8 and 9; and 1.6 Whereas, the District has reviewed the grant application submitted by Recipient and has determined that the application meets the requirements of Chapter 89.08 RCW, the District's policies and procedures for awarding grants and the funding principles established by King County's Regional Water Quality Committee; and 1.7 Whereas, the District and Recipient desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of establishing the terms and conditions relating to the District's award of a grant to Recipient. - 1 - a l SECTION 2. AGREEMENT 2.1 The District agrees to award Recipient a grant in the total amount of fifty thousand Dollars ($50,000 from 2006 Assessments). Grant funds shall be used by Recipient solely for the performance of the work described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The District shall pay the grant funds to Recipient in accordance with the District's standard procedures, provided that such funds have been collected and received by the District. 2.2 Recipient represents and warrants that it will only use the grant funds for the work described in Exhibit A, which may be amended by the parties pursuant to Paragraph 3.3 of the Agreement. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized work. Further, Recipient agrees to return to the District any grant funds that are not expended or remain after completion of the work covered by this Agreement. 2.3 Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the grant funds may only be expended on work which shall be entirely within the District's jurisdictional boundaries. The following municipal entities are not within the District's jurisdictional boundaries: Enumclaw, Federal Way, Milton, Pacific, and Skykomish. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for work performed outside the District's jurisdictional boundaries. 2.4 In the event the scope of work authorized,b_y this,Agreement:includes the use of grant funds to purchase houses located on real property within a flood hazard area, Recipient acknowledges and agrees that grant funds may only be used for such purposes if the houses to be purchased were constructed before floodplain mapping or sensitive areas regulations were in place for that area. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized purposes. 2.5 Recipient shall be required to provide the District with biannual financial and project progress reports, along with an annual summary report. Financial and project reports shall be due May 31 and November 30 each year. The Recipient shall also be required to submit to the District a final report which documents the Recipient's completion of the work in conformance with this Agreement within thirty (30) days after the completion of the work. The final report shall, among other things, summarize the project's successes and shall address the regional benefits accomplished by the work. The final report shall also identify any obstacles or challenges which were encountered during the work, along with general recommendations regarding ways to avoid such obstacles or challenges in the future. If requested, Recipient agrees to provide the District with additional financial or progress reports from time to time, at reasonable intervals. 2.6 Recipient's expenditures of grant funds shall be separately identified in the Recipient's accounting records. If requested, Recipient shall comply with other reasonable requests made by the District with respect to the manner in which project expenditures are - 2 - r tracked and accounted for in Recipient's accounting books and records. Recipient shall maintain such records of expenditures as may be necessary to conform to generally accepted accounting principals and to meet the requirements of all applicable state and federal laws. 2.7 Recipient shall be required to track project expenses using the Budget Accounting and Reporting System for the State of Washington("BARS"). 2.8 The District or its representative shall have the right from time to time, at reasonable intervals, to audit the Recipient's books and records in order to verify compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Recipient shall cooperate with the District in any such audit. 2.9 Recipient shall retain all accounting records and project files relating to this Agreement in accordance with criteria established in the Revised Code of Washington and the Washington State Archivist. 2.10 Recipient shall ensure that all work performed by Recipient or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors is performed in a manner which protects and safeguards the environment and natural resources and which is in compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations. Recipient shall implement an appropriate monitoring system or program to ensure compliance with this provision. 2.11 Recipient agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, its elected or appointed officials, employees and agents,,from all claims, alleged liability, damages, losses to or death of peg on o 'd�}age to ro ' e resulting from the negligent or intentional acts of the Recipient or any of its-'emp oyyees, agents`,contractors or subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. 2.12 Recipient agrees to acknowledge the District as a source of funding for this project on all literature, signage or press releases related to said project. SECTION 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 3.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No prior or contemporaneous representation, inducement, promise or agreement between or among the parties which relate to the subject matter hereof which are not embodied in this Agreement shall be of any force or effect. 3.3 No amendment to this Agreement shall be binding on any of the parties to this Agreement unless such amendment is in writing and is executed by the parties. The parties contemplate that this Agreement.may from time to time be modified by written amendment which shall be executed by duly authorized representatives of the parties and attached to this Agreement. - 3 - 3.4 Each party warrants and represents that such party has full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement and each person executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents that he/she has been fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and that such party is bound by the signature of such representative. DISTRICT: RECIPIENT: Y Y Mayor Kath Keolker Name U.-,e- evrA Attest: ` Title Deputy City Clerk Michele Neumann Date Date Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form: DISTRICT LEGAL COUNSEL: RECIPIENT'S ATTORNEY: By Byol� _ 7 L- Name t. $" , t _; Name Lawrence J. Warren Date! Date - 4 - n Exhibit A Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive . King Conservation District competitive Grant Application Project Title: Upper Springbrook Creek Restoration Project A licant: City of Renton Contact: Allen Qu nn Principal Partners (if any): US Army Corps Title: Surface Water Engineer of Engineers Total Project Cost: $1,100,000 Address: 1055 S. Grady Way Renton,WA 98057 KCD Funding Requested: $50,000 Phone: 425-430-7247 Project Start Date: Aril 2007 Fax: 425-430-7241 Project End Date: December 2008 E-mail: aquynn@ci.renton.wa.us 1. Project Description-provide a brief description of the project that summarizes what you will do,how you will do it, and why you will do it. Consider the following in the answer to this question: what pressing need will be addressed by the project or what promising opportunity will be capitalized on?Who or what will benefit or be positively and negatively affected? The purpose of this grant request is to support the City of Renton in the design and permitting phase of the Upper Springbrook Creek Restoration project, as part of the Green/Duwamish River Basin Ecosystem Restoration Program. The project was first identified and documented within the Green/Duwamish River Basin Ecosystem Restoration Study Final Feasibility Report published in October 2000. The City may consider applying for a separate grant in the future to offset project construction costs. The goal of the project is to replace an existing roadside ditch with a natural,meandering stream channel with spawning,rearing, and storm refuge habitat for migrating salmon. Proposed project elements include adding spawning gravel,large woody debris,riparian plantings,evaluating and implementing methods for sediment removal,and replacing existing culvert with a new fish-passable culvert under S. 55th Street in Renton,Washington. In its current state,Upper Springbrook Creek is confined to a roadside ditch approximately 900 feet in length between SR-167 and S. 55th street. The ditch is degraded, lacking native riparian vegetation, dominated by invasive reed canary grass and blackberry shrubs, and has degraded stream habitat. In addition, sediment from upstream erosion runoff periodically fills in the ditch. A sediment trap with maintenance access constructed downstream of the culvert will facilitate sediment removal. H .I ile Svs'•.5WI' - Surface eater Projects'.SWP-27- Surface Water Projects (CIP)'27-3023 Ecosysten3 Restoration Proiects,Upper Springbrook Creek`•,Grants`KC;D - Upper Springbrook Creek Grant Application..do'c Page I of 4 As one of the recommended projects identified in the Green/Duwamish Ecosystem ' Restoration Program,the City will partner with the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to complete the project. 2. Natural Resource Improvement Actions- describe how the project will address a minimum of one of the natural resource improvement actions described on page 1 of the application instructions. Consider the following in your answer to this question: What natural resources will be improved? What are the known needs,gaps or deficits that will be addressed? What are the known benefits to soil, water, air,plants,fish and wildlife, landowners? Through a sequence of design,permitting,and construction,the project will address the following natural resource improvement action: Direct Improvement of Natural Resource Conditions -to improve landscape and natural resource conditions as a result of direct action. The Upper Springbrook Creek Restoration Project will implement appropriate natural resource improvement actions to improve water quality and riparian habitat by removing invasive plant species, introducing native vegetation to provide shade,constructing a sediment trap to minimize sediment loading,relocating the existing ditch alignment into a meandering stream separated from the road,placing large,woody debris for in-stream shade and protection from predators for salmon, and replacement of existing culvert with fish friendly culvert. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results -list specific project activities to be completed, the timetable for the activities, and the deliverables associated with those activities. Consider the following in your answer to this question: What actions, interventions, programs, services will be deployed? 1. Conduct topographic and utility survey of project area-2nd Quarter 2007- Completed base survey 2. Conduct geotechnical investigation-2nd Quarter 2007- Completed geotechnical report. 3. Prepare and submit JARPA applications -3rd Quarter 2007- Completed applications. 4. Produce 95%complete design plans,including planting plan and specifications-4th Quarter 2007. 5. Begin construction-3rd Quarter 2008. 6. Complete project-4th Quarter 2008. 7. Implement project and Plant Monitoring plan-Time period not established at this time. 4. Effectiveness (see page 2 of application instructions for definition) - describe how the project will effectively implement the natural resource improvement measures identified in question No. 2 above. Consider the following in your answer to this question: Why is the primary applicant the best entihj to deliver the proposed program/service/intervention? What is the capacity of the primary applicant to deliver the proposed program/service/intervention? What tools, services and partners will be brought to bear? }l ;File Svs'SWP- Surface Water Projects'SWP-27- Surface Water Projects(C IP)12?-3023 Ecosystem Restoration Projects\upper Springbrook Creek'%Gra its`.KCD- tipper Sprhigbrook Creek Grant Applicatim.doc Page 2 of 4 • This project is one of the recommended projects to be implemented as part of the Green/Duwamish River Basin Ecosystem Restoration Study Feasibility Report dated October 2000. The Ecosystem Restoration Program is a collaborative effort between 17 Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 9 member jurisdictions and the Corps to identify and improve salmon habitat throughout the Green/Duwamish River Basin. The Upper Springbrook Creek Restoration project is located within the City of Renton and the City has already secured a 100'wide easement along S. 55th Street. The City has experienced staff available to assist the Corps with the engineering design and management of the project. 5. Efficiency(see page 2 of application instructions for definition) -describe how the project will efficiently implement the natural resource improvement measures identified in question No. 2 above. Consider the following in your answer to this question: How will the proposed program/service/intervention engage in conjunction with related efforts?How does your strategy best leverage resources? The project is part of a comprehensive plan to improve habitat through the GreerVDuwamish River Basin. This project will be the first of several projects on Springbrook Creek that will eventually extend all the way down to the Black River Pump Station. Also,by partnering with the Corps,the City will be able to obtain federal matching funds to complete the project. 6. Equity (see page 2 of application instructions for definition) -describe how the project will equitably implement the natural resource improvement measures identified in question No. 2 above. Consider the following in your answer to this question: In what part of the District will the proposed program/service/intervention occur? Who is the target audience and what demographic section of the community will he affected? The City of Renton has a number of projects proposed for implementation through the Green/Duwamish River Basin Ecosystem Restoration Study, and has supported the program for more than a decade through both staff participation and local funds. As the first project scheduled for implementation within the City of Renton,the Upper Springbrook Creek Restoration project is geographically important. Although the target audience for the project are the citizens of Renton,the project will also benefit the lower portions of the stream in the city of Kent with significantly improved water quality and habitat for diverse populations of fish,wildlife,and the people of the region. 7. Evaluation of Intended Results - describe the evaluation mechanisms you will use to track, document,and report that the project has achieved the intended results described in questions 1-3. The City of Renton (and its contractors) will work in partnership with the Corps (and its contractors) on a program of monitoring and maintenance of the project,consistent with both the requirements of this grant and local permits. The completed project will be evaluated and documented for water quality and both in-stream and riparian habitat improvements,as well as control of invasive plant species and the appropriate survival of native plants. At the conclusion of this project, an Operations and Maintenance Manual will be developed by the City of Renton for continued maintenance, with the objective of a sustainable stream restoration. }1 111e Svs'SWP-Surface Water Proiects,SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects(CIP)' 7-3023 Ecosystem Restoration ProjecTs�[1ppe.r Springbrook C �ek`1Gmnts`.1{CB- Uppor Spriitgbrook Creel:Gram Application.doc Page 3 of 4 r The appropriate evaluation and analysis of this project will help guide other projects with similar elements proposed for implementation in the GreerVDuwamish River Basin Ecosystem Restoration Program and in the broader region. 8. Project Budget &Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Total (City of Renton or ACOE Salaries and Benefits Travel/Meals/Mileage Office/Field Supplies Contracted/Professional $30,000 $150,000 $180,000 Services Land Acquisition $50,000 $50,000 Permits $20,000 $20,000 Construction $850,000 $850,000 TOTAL $50,000 $1,050,000 $1,100,000 9. KCD Acknowledgement-describe how the KCD will be acknowledged as a source of funding for the proposed program/service/intervention (see page 3 of application instructions for requirements). The City will acknowledge KCD through the City's web site and press releases through local newspapers. KCD will be invited,and recognized as a project sponsor,at a construction ground breaking ceremony. Other possibilities include interpretive signs installed near the stream acknowledging KCD as a sponsor of the project. 4 ;� Jdx�-7 Au orized ijnat# Dat y o� CITY OF RENTON ♦ ♦ Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator INTO November 29,2007 Brandy Reed King Conservation District 935 Powell Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: UPPER SPRINGBROOK CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT BIANNUAL FINANCIAL AND PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1 Dear Ms.Reed: As required under Section 2.5 of the Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grant between the City and the King Conservation District,the Municipal and WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Expense Report, and the Member Jurisdiction&WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report for the Upper Springbrook Creek Restoration Project for the reporting period ending November 30, 2007,are enclosed. Please call me at 425-430-7247, if you have any questions. Sincerely, /rility Allen QuySurface W Engineer Enclosures HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA l 1-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation;!is�tficffilUpper Springbrook Creek Reports\Biannual Report Ldoc\AQgd 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98057 R E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer Member Juridiction & WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report g p King Conservation District WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: Upper Springbrook Creek Restoration Project Grantee: City of Renton Attention: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 S Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: 1 Reporting Period: June 1 , 2007 - November 30 , 2 0 0 7/ �Pc 6ey ( � ;LJO7 - ),AA� 3li av� � Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity Conduct topographic and No activity completed to date. Utility Survey of project area. Conduct geotechnical No activity completed to date. investigation. Prepare and submit JARPA No activity completed to date. application. Produce 95% complete design No activity completed to date. plans and specifications . Begin construction. No activity completed to date. Complete construction. No activity completed to date. Implement project and plant No activity completed to date. monitoring plan. Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Municipality & WRIA Forum 11( ?D Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: Upper Springbrook Creek Restoration Project Grantee: City of Renton Project Contact: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 S Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: 1 / Reporting Period: June 1 , 2007 - November 30 , 2007 v (,J C Ct PA b"- dou7 - Ma y ?l) aoUB Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining Contracted/ $30 , 000 -0. -0- $3-G-,-"-O Professional 3v, vuv �u uuv Services Permit $20 , 000 -0- -0 $20-,..0-40 2v, dIV au Su) vim, TOTAL $ 50 ,000 $ -0- $ -0- Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 11(�aqvqww'D Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report g p King Conservation District WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: Attention: Address: City/State: Phone: Report No.: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5E] #6 F1 #7 Final Report Reporting Period: Instructions: In the left column below, list the project activities detailed in answer to question 3 of the Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Grant Application; and in the right column below, describe the progress to date on each of those project activity. Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity Email: jurisdiction wria grants@kingcd org page 1 of 2 Mail: King Conservation District Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Grant Program 935 Powell Ave SW Renton WA 98057 H ?D Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report g p King Conservation District WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: Attention: Address: City/State: Phone: Report No.: #1 n #2 n #3 #4 n #5n #6 #7 Final Report Reporting Period: Instructions: In the left column below, list the project activities detailed in answer to question 3 of the Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Grant Application; and in the right column below, describe the progress to date on each of those project activity. Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity Email:jurisdiction wria grants@kingcd.org page 1 of 2 Mail: King Conservation District Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Grant Program 935 Powell Ave SW Renton WA 98057 Expense Report Detail Project Name: Report No.: Instructions: Use this form when accounting system reports are not available. Attach copies of receipts for all expenses. Number each piece of documentation and note each number by budget line item in table below. It is not necessary to use this form or provide receipts when accounting system reports that include grant budget line item subtotals are provided. Budget Line Item (specify, e.g. Salaries/Wages, Contracted Services): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount TOTAL $ Email:jurisdiction wria grants@kingcd.org Mail: King Conservation District, Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Grants Program,935 Powell Ave SW Ste D, Renton,WA 98057 Page 2 of 2 Expense Report Detail Project Name: Report No.: Instructions: use this form when accounting system reports are not available. Attach copies of receipts for all expenses. Number each piece of documentation and note each number by budget line item in table below. It is not necessary to use this form or provide receipts when accounting system reports that include grant budget line item subtotals are provided. Budget Line Item (specify, e.g. Salaries/Wages, Contracted Services): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount TOTAL $ Email:jurisdiction wria grants@kingcd.org Mail: King Conservation District, Member Jurisdiction&WRIA Forum Grants Program,935 Powell Ave SW Ste D, Renton,WA 98057 Page 2 of 2 Expense Report Detail Project Name: Report No.: Instructions: Use this form when accounting system reports are not available. Attach copies of receipts for all expenses. Number each piece of documentation and note each number by budget line item in table below. It is not necessary to use this form or provide receipts when accounting system reports that include grant budget line item subtotals are provided. Budget Line Item (specify, e.g. Salaries/Wages, Contracted Services): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount TOTAL $ Email:jurisdiction wria grants@kingcd.org Mail: King Conservation District, Member Jurisdiction&WRIA Forum Grants Program,935 Powell Ave SW Ste D, Renton,WA 98057 Page 2 of 2 Expense Report Detail Project Name: Report No.: Instructions: Use this form when accounting system reports are not available. Attach copies of receipts for all expenses. Number each piece of documentation and note each number by budget line item in table below. It is not necessary to use this form or provide receipts when accounting system reports that include grant budget line item subtotals are provided. Budget Line Item (specify, e.g. Salaries/Wages, Contracted Services): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount TOTAL $ Email:jurisdiction wria✓grants@kingcd.org Mail: King Conservation District, Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Grants Program,935 Powell Ave SW Ste D, Renton,WA 98057 Page 2 of 2 Expense Report Detail Project Name: Report No.: Instructions: Use this form when accounting system reports are not available. Attach copies of receipts for all expenses. Number each piece of documentation and note each number by budget line item in table below. It is not necessary to use this form or provide receipts when accounting system reports that include grant budget line item subtotals are provided. Budget Line Item (specify, e.g. Salaries/Wages, Contracted Services): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount TOTAL $ Email:jurisdiction wria grants@kingcd.org Mail: King Conservation District, Member Jurisdiction&WRIA Forum Grants Program,935 Powell Ave SW Ste D, Renton,WA 98057 Page 2 of 2 Expense Report Detail Project Name: Report No.: Instructions: Use this form when accounting system reports are not available. Attach copies of receipts for all expenses. Number each piece of documentation and note each number by budget line item in table below. It is not necessary to use this form or provide receipts when accounting system reports that include grant budget line item subtotals are provided. Budget Line Item (specify, e.g. Salaries/Wages, Contracted Services): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount Budget Line Item (specify): Date Payee Description Documentation Amount TOTAL $ Email:jurisdiction wria grants@kingcd.org Mail: King Conservation District, Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Grants Program,935 Powell Ave SW Ste D, Renton,WA 98057 Page 2 of 2 Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Grant Expense Report King Conservation District WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: Project Contact: Address: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Instructions: Complete this form and attach accounting system reports to document expenses. Use Expense Report Detail when accounting system reports are not available and attach copies of receipts. Return electronic and hard copies. Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining TOTAL $ $ $ $ Email:jurisdiction wria grants@kingcd org Page 1 of 2 Mail: King Conservation District Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Grants 935 Powell Ave SW Ste D Renton, WA 98057 Ilia S r 11("qqN?WID Member Juridiction & WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report King Conservation District WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project Grantee: City of Renton Attention: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 S Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: Reporting Period: Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity * Replace existing undersized - No activities completed to culvert with a new box date culvert. * Construct stream bypass and No activities completed to provide dewatering of date groundwater during construction. * Relocate utilities . No activities completed to date * Provide a more natural and No activities completed to better-lined streambed date including adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert to enhance fish passage. * Provide riparian habitat INo activities completed to planting including a mix date of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 H ?D Member Juridiction & WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report King Conservation District WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project Grantee: City of Renton Attention: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 S Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: Reporting Period: Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity * Replace exitting undersized ' 'No activities completed to culvert with a new box date culvert. * Construct stream bypass and No activities completed to provide dewatering of date groundwater during construction. * Relocate utilities. No activities completed to date * Provide a more natural and No activities completed to better--lined streambed date including adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert to enhance fish passage. * Provide riparian habitat INo activities completed to planting including a mix date of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Municipality & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project Grantee: City of Renton Project Contact: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 South Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: 1 Reporting Period: February 17 , 2006 - May, 31 , 2006 Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining Contracted/ $55 ,084 . 85 -0- -0- $55 , 084 . 85 Professiona Services TOTAL $ 55 ,084 . 85 $ -0- $ -0- $ 55 ,084 . 85 Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity Page 2 CITY OF RENTON + � + Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 16, 2007 Brandy Reed King Conservation District 935 Powell Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: SW 34'"STREET CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT BIANNUAL FINANCIAL AND PROGRESS REPORT NO.3 Dear Ms. Reed: As required under Section 2.5 of the Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grant between the City and the King Conservation District,the Municipal and WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Ex ense Report,and the Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report for the SW 34 Street Culvert Replacement Project for the reporting period ending May 31,2007, is enclosed. The project is scheduled for construction in the summer of 2007. Therefore,no grant funds have been expended and there are no project activities or measurable results to report. Please call me at 425-430-7247, if you have any questions. ;l Sincerely, /1 Allen Qtiyn Project Manager Surface,rW er Utility 1 Enclosures HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservatio ffstrictTiannua Report 3.doc\AQmd 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98057 R E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer Municipality & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project Grantee: city of Renton Project Contact: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 S Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: Reporting Period: Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining Contracted/ $55 ,084 . 85 -0- -0- $55 ,084 .85 Professional Services TOTAL $ 55 ,084 . 85 $ -0- $ -0- $ 55 ,084 .85 Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Member Juridiction & WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report King Conservation District WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project Grantee: City of Renton Attention: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 S Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: Reporting Period: Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity * Replace exitting undersized -No activities completed to culvert with a new box date culvert. * Construct stream bypass and No activities completed to provide dewatering of date groundwater during construction. * Relocate utilities . No activities completed to date * Provide a more natural and No activities completed to better-lined streambed date including adding new spawning gravel substrate within thh culvert to enhance fish passage. * Provide riparian habitat No activities completed to planting including a mix date of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Municipality&WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project .Grantee: City of Renton Project Contact: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 South Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: 1 - Reporting Period: February 17 , 2006 - May, 31 , 2006 Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current 'Balance (specify) Amount- Expenditure- expenditure) Remaining Contracted/ $55 ,084 .85 -0- -0- $55 ,084 .85 Profossiona Services TOTAL $ 55 ,084 .85 $ -0- $ -0- $ 55 ,084 .85 Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 n�*O� '4 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator NT May 26, 2006 Brandy Reed King Conservation District 935 Powell Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: SW 34T1 STREET CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT BIANNUAL FINANCIAL AND PROGRESS REPORT NO.,1�Z Dear Ms. Reed: As required under Section 2.5 of the Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grant between the City and the King Conservation District,the Municipal and VIM Forum Noncompetitive Grant Expense Repo jfor the SW.34`h_Street Culvert Replacement Project for the reporting period ending May 31 2IIIIb_,is enclosed. ' i'"• d w1L rA Ksl aYp�.r The project is scheduled for construction in the summer of 2007. Therefore,no grant funds have been expended and there are no project activities or measurable results to report. Please call me at 425-430-7247, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Allen Quynn roj t Manager Surface Wat r Ut' ty Enclosure H:�File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\ICing Conservation DistrictU3iannual Report I.doc\AQtp 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This pacer contains 50%recvGed material.30%cost consumer ]K�avwD Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum King Conservation District Grant Progress Report WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project Grantee: City of Renton Attention: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 S. Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: 1 Reporting Period: February 17, 2006 - May 31, 2006 �VNt_ I� a dVG— ^/��rnrl�t7z 3p 2U'JL Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity • Replace existing undersized culvert with a No activities completed to date new box culvert. • Construct stream bypass and provide No activities completed to date dewatering of groundwater during construction. • Relocate utilities. No activities completed to date • Provide a more natural and better-lined No activities completed to date streambed including adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert to enhance fish passage. • Provide riparian habitat planting including a No activities completed to date mix of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Return to: King Conservation District,Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98055 Page 1 y o� CITY OF RENTON ♦ A4 '} ♦ Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator NT May 31,2006 Brandy Reed King Conservation District 935 Powell Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: SW 34TH STREET CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT BIANNUAL GRANT PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1 Dear Ms. Reed: As required under Section 2.5 of the Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grant between the City and the King Conservation District,the Member Jurisdiction& WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report for the SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project for the reporting period ending May 31, 2006, is enclosed. Please call me at 425-430-7247, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Allen Q n Project Manager Surface ater Utility Enclosure HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\Biannual Report la.doc\AQtp R E N T O N 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE Member Juridiction & WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report King Conservation District WRIA Forum: Project Name: Grantee: Attention: Address: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 4 y Municipality & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: Project Name: G ra ntee: Project Contact: Add ress: City/State: Phone: Report No.: Reporting Period: Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining TOTAL $ $ $ $ Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Municipality & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project Grantee. City of Renton Project Contact: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 S Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: Reporting Period: Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining Contracted/ $55 ,084 . 85 -0- -0- $55 ,084 . 85 Professional Services TOTAL $ 55 ,084 .85 $ -0- $ -0- $ 55 ,084 . 85 Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 Municipality & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project Grantee: City of Renton Project Contact: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 S Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: Reporting Period: Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining Contracted/ $55 ,084 .85 -0- -0- $55 ,084 .85 Professional Services TOTAL $ 55 ,084 .85 $ -0- $ -0- $ 55 , 084 .85 Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 F Y O� CITY OF RENTON ♦ � ♦ Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator November 29, 2007 Brandy Reed King Conservation District 935 Powell Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: SW 34'H STREET CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT BIANNUAL FINANCIAL AND PROGRESS REPORT NO.4 Dear Ms. Reed: As required under Section 2.5 of the Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grant between the City and the King Conservation District,the Municipal and WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant ExFense Report, and the Member Jurisdiction&WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report for the SW 34' Street Culvert Replacement Project for the reporting period ending November 30, 2007, are enclosed. The project is substantially complete with only the installation of the guardrail,handrail,road stripping and sidewalk remaining to be completed. Please call me at 425-430-7247, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Allen Quynn,ktity Surface Wategineer Enclosures HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation tstrict\Biannual Report 4.doc\AQgd 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98057 R E N T O N ®This contains 50%recycled material,30% AHEAD OF THE CURVE paper cY post consumer Municipality &WRIA Forum 11( ?D Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project Grantee: City of Renton Project Contact: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 S Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA 98057 Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: 4 Reporting Period: June 1 , 2007 - November 30 , 2007 Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining Contracted/ $55 ,084 .85 $55 ,084 . 85 $55 ,084 .85 0 rofessional ervices TOTAL $55 ,084 .85 $55 ,084 . 85 $55 , 084 . 85 $ 0 Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 raD Member Juridiction & WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report King Conservation District WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project Grantee: City of Renton Attention: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 S Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: 4 Reporting Period: June 1 , 2007 - November 30 , 2007 Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity * Replace exitting undersized ' Completed. culvert with a new box culvert. * Construct stream bypass and Completed. provide dewatering of groundwater during construction. * Relocate utilities . Completed. * Provide a more natural and Completed. better-lined streambed including adding new spawning gravel substrate within thb culvert to enhance fish passage. * Provide riparian habitat Completed. planting including a mix of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 CITY OF RENTON ♦ ♦ Planning/Buildin&ublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator NT November 30, 2006 Brandy Reed King Conservation District 935 Powell Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: SW 34TH STREET CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT BIANNUAL FINANCIAL AND PROGRESS REPORT NO.2 Dear Ms. Reed: As required under Section 2.5 of the Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grant between the City and the King Conservation District,the Municipal and WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant ExFense Report, and the Member Jurisdiction&WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report for the SW 34' Street Culvert Replacement Project for the reporting period ending November 30,2006, is enclosed. The project is scheduled for construction in the summer of 2007. Therefore,no grant funds have been expended and there are no project activities or measurable results to report. Please call me at 425-430-7247, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Allen Quy*. Pr ,ect Manager Surface Water: tility Enclosure HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation DiSt—fi&Biann.al Report 2.docWQtp R E N T O N 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE Municipality & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Expense Report WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project Grantee: City of Renton Project Contact: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 S Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: 2 Reporting Period: June 1 , 2006 - November 30 , 2006 Budget Summary Budget Year to Date Line Item Budget Current (include current Balance (specify) Amount Expenditure expenditure) Remaining Contracted/ $55 ,084 .85 -0- -0- $55 ,084 . 85 Professional Services TOTAL $ 55 ,084 .85 $ -0- $ -0- $ 55 ,084 .85 Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 11( ?D Member Juridiction & WRIA Forum Grant Progress Report King Conservation District WRIA Forum: WRIA 9 Project Name: SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project Grantee: City of Renton Attention: Allen Quynn Address: 1055 S Grady Way City/State: Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7247 Report No.: 2 Reporting Period: June 1 , 2006 - November 30 , 2006 Approved Grant Activities Progress by Approved Grant Activity * Replace exitting undersized ' 'No activities completed to culvert with a new box date culvert. * Construct stream bypass and No activities completed to provide dewatering of date groundwater during construction. * Relocate utilities. No activities dompleted to date * Provide a more natural and No activities completed to better-lined streambed date including adding new spawning gravel substrate within thh culvert to enhance fish passage. * Provide riparian habitat No activities completed to planting including a mix date of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert . Return to: King Conservation District, Brandy Reed 935 Powell Avenue SW, Renton WA 98055 Page 1 ti�Y o City of Renton PLANNING/BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Utility Systems - Fifth Floor 1055 South Grady Way Date: 11/28/2005 Renton, WA 98055 TO: Larry Warren FROM: Libby Parker Secretary II Phone: (425) 255-8678 Phone: (425) 430-7234 Fax Phone: (425) 255-5474 Fax Phone: (425) 430-7241 ISUBJECT: Agenda Bill & Resolution I Number of pages including cover sheet 39 REMARKS: ❑ Original to ❑ Urgent ❑ Reply ❑ Please ❑ For your be mailed ASAP Comment review l� (zt�,' l RENTON aiu:au or 'rH E CUxvt_ Y O� PLANNING/BUILDING/ , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IN M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 5, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor Allen Quynn, Surface Water Engineer SUBJECT: 2002-2005 King Conservation District Agreement for Noncompetitive Grants ISSUE: Should the Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to (1) execute an agreement with the King Conservation District(KCD) to accept the City of Renton annual share of the approved King Conservation District assessment, and (2) approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance? RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department staff recommends that Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King County Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservation District fund allocation from 2002 to 2005. In addition, staff also requests that the Council approve using a portion($4,869) of Renton's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The City of Renton became a member of the King Conservation District in March 1992, upon the passage of Resolution No. 2885. At that time, the King County Council approved a $1.25 per parcel assessment against all properties within jurisdictions that are members of the King Conservation District on August 16, 1993. Subsequently, K.C. Ordinance 12959, approved by the King County Council in December 1997, adopted the Regional Water Quality Committee's recommendation to raise the Conservation District annual assessment from $1.25 per parcel to $5 per parcel. The $1.25 per parcel assessment had been in place since the King County Council adopted Ordinance 10981 in Terri Briere December 5,2005 Page 2 of 2 August 1993 and was renewed in 1995 by Ordinance 12095. The Ordinances provide that the generated revenues be distributed as follows: • $3 distributed equally to each of the five watershed forums • $1 per parcel to the County and each city in the District from which the funds were collected • $1 per parcel to the District for implementation of its approved work program. The District will either spend the funds in cities by providing services, or will transfer the funding to the cities to be used as financial assistance for stream restoration, fish habitat, and/or water quality projects. Based on the assessment collected in 2004 by the King Conservation District, the annual share available to Renton is approximately$16,393 per year. The grant funds could be used to pay the District for specific additional services or could be transferred to the City for use on eligible projects. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of a total KCD assessment from 2002 through 2005 estimated at $65,936. The amount of the agreement does not match the total estimated assessment due to the fact that the agreement amount is based on the approved grant application submitted in July of this year. The amount requested in the application was based on the estimated 2005 assessment at the time the application was prepared. Since that time, the estimated 2005 assessment has been revised by KCD to include an additional $6,000.15. Although the balance of$6,000.15 cannot be used under the 2005 agreement, it will be available for the City to use for future projects covered under a separate grant application and subsequent agreement. The KCD assessment will be used to fund the City sponsored SW 34 h Street Drainage Improvement Project ($55,084.85) and the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored the Black River Watershed Alliance ($4,869). Both of these projects will help to restore fish habitat as well as improve water quality in the Springbrook Creek Basin. Attached is a brief description of projects that are being requested for funding by the district for this year. Also attached is a copy of an agreement to allow the transfer of funds from the King Conservation District to the City along with a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. CONCLUSION: Council approves a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with the King Conservation District to accept the City of Renton share of the approved King Conservation District assessment and approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. HA\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\Issue Paper.docAQlp CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Flu#: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of- Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division/ Surface December 5, 2005 Water Utility Staff Contact...... Ron Straka (ext. 7248) Allen Quynn (ext. 7247) Agenda Status Consent.............. X Subject: Public Hearing.. 2002-2005 king Conservation District Agreement for Correspondence.. Noncompetitive Grants Ordinance............. Resolution............ Old Business........ Exhibits: New Business....... Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Resolution Information......... Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grants Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other............... X Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $0 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... $59,953.85 (requested fund allocation for 2002-2005) Total Project Budget... City Share Total Project... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The King Conservation District(KCD) agreement allows the transfer of the City of Renton's $1 per parcel share of the $5 per parcel KCD Assessment of parcels within Renton. The grant funding can be used on projects that are approved by KCD such as water quality, habitat enhancement, water and fisheries resource protection projects and programs. The current estimated balance of the grant funding available to the City from 2002 through 2005 is approximately$65,936.00. This includes the yearly accrued assessment from prior years (2002-2004) of$49,178.20 plus the estimated 2005 allocation of$16,757.80. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of the total 2002-2005 estimated assessment to fund the following projects: (1) The City sponsored SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project, and (2) the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department staff recommends that Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King County Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservation District fund allocation from 2002 to 2005. In addition, staff also requests that the Council approve using a portion ($4,869) of Renton's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1 1-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\AgenBill-grant funds.doc\AQlp CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR AWARD OF A NON- COMPETITIVE GRANT. WHEREAS, King Conservation District No. 9 has funds available to it to assist the City of Renton in providing certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has applied for and received a grant to perform such activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions relating to the award of the grant to the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement for award of non-competitive grant to the City of Renton from King Conservation District No. 9. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of December, 2005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk H:\Fi1e Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\reso l ution.doc RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of December, 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 2 Project Name: SW 34"' Street Culvert Contact: Allen Quynn Re lace_ment Project _ Applicant. CitLof Renton Title: Project Manager Principal Partners (if any): Address: 1055 S. Grady Way City of Renton Renton, WA 98055 Total Project Cost: $900,000 (estimated) Phone: 425-430-7247 KCD Funding Requested: $55,084.85 Fax: 425-430-7247 Project Start Date: April 2005 E-mail: aquynn@ci.renton.wa.us Project End Date: Fall 2007 1. Brief Project Description (---200 words): The purpose of this project is to replace the existing Springbrook Creek culvert crossing of SW 34`h Street in Renton, Washington. The crossing consists of 4 existing, undersized corrugated metal (CMP) culverts that will be replaced with a new box culvert. Springbrook Creek is the main drainage channel for the 24-square mile Black River Basin that includes portions of the Cities of Renton, Kent, Tukwila and unincorporated King County. Springbrook Creek drains to the Black River Pump Station where flows are pumped into the Green River(see attached figures 6-1 and 6-2). The fisheries resources within Springbrook Creek include Chinook and Coho salmon, steelhead and cutthroat trout. The existing culverts were constructed in 1980 and are a major restriction of flows that contribute to the flooding problems in portions of the south valley during storm events. The project consists of the following elements: • Construction of a new box culvert including stream bypass. • Placement of spawning gravel in the bottom of the culvert. • Placement of woody debris on the sides of the channel. • Planting of riparian trees and shrubs along channel bank. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts,provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): The project will accomplish the following objectives: • Eliminate flooding of the SW 34`h Street/Springbrook Creek crossing during the I00-yr storm event. • Lower upstream water levels,which will increase the capacity of local storm systems in Lind Avenue and SW 34`h Street. • Upsizing the SW 341h Street culvert in conjunction with future pipe system improvements will help the City meet flood protection goals in the valley. • Provide improved fish passage and riparian habitat for salmonid migration. The following provides a brief description of how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.01: "To prepare and keep current a comprehensive long-range program recommending the conservation of all the renewable natural resources of the District. Such King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application programs shall be directed toward the best use of renewable natural resources and in a manner that will best meet the needs of the District and the state, taking into consideration, where appropriate, such uses as farming, grazing,timber supply, forest, parks,outdoor recreation, potable water supplies for urban and rural areas, water for agriculture, minimal flow, and industrial uses,watershed stabilization, control of soil erosion,retardation of water run-off, flood prevention and control, reservoirs and other water storage, restriction of developments of flood plains, protection of open space and scenery, preservation of natural beauty, protection of fish and wildlife, preservation of wilderness areas and wild rivers,the prevention or reduction of sedimentation and other pollution in rivers and other waters, and such location of highways, schools, housing developments, industries,airports and other facilities and structures as will fit the needs of the state and be consistent with the best uses of the renewable natural resources of the state. The program shall include an inventory of all renewable natural resources in the District, a compilation of current resource needs, projections of future resource requirements, priorities for various resource activities, projected timetables,descriptions of available alternatives, and provisions for coordination with other resource programs. Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project meets the above criteria by reducing flooding of SW 34`h Street as well as upstream storm systems that discharge to Springbrook Creek. The new culvert will be designed to prevent flooding of the SW 34'h Street crossing during the 100-yr stone event and lower tail water conditions for outfalls discharging upstream. The project will also help protect fish by lowering stream velocities during storm events through the new culvert to facilitate fish passage. KCD Strategic Plan Initiate: This proposal meets the strategic plan element 2,d(111)Support for Regional Conservation Initiatives, which states: "The District will join in regional conservation initiatives,lending its leadership and expertise on issues such as major river flooding,preserving and restoring fish habitat,protecting and restoring water quality in watersheds and general public conservation education programs in the region". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is one element of a series of projects recommended in the City of Renton's 1997 East Side Green River Watershed Plan and EIS (ESGRWP),which was a basin wide planning level study to identify projects that would help reduce the flooding in the Renton valley area. The ESGRWP identified the replacement of the SW 34'h Street crossing of Springbrook Creek to reduce upstream water levels and improve fish passage. As discussed under the previous criteria,the proposed project will eliminate flooding of SW 34`h Street during the 100-yr storm as well as reduce flooding in local storm systems upstream that discharge to the creek. The project will also improve water quality and provide wildlife habitat with the addition of riparian plantings such as native shrubs and trees along the channel bank. In-stream woody debris will also be added to provide fish rearing and refuge habitat. Springbrook Creek is within Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA)9. The draft WR1A 9 Salmon Habitat Plan identifies the need for improving fish passage riparian habitat and water quality to benefit Chinook salmon and other salmonids. HAFile Sys\.SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\.SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.do6AQtp King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Regional Funding Principles Established by the Kin County Regional Task Force: The project satisfies regional task force funding principles criteria 3,1(11), which states: "Habitat restoration which enhances ecological significant fish runs". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is located on Springbrook Creek, which historically has poor water quality, particularly low dissolved oxygen due to high water temperatures. The basin,especially the valley floor has become highly urbanized with large commercial and industrial areas that directly discharge to Springbrook Creek. This project will address water quality by planting plants and trees along the channel bank that will help provide shade and help cool the creek during the summer months. Woody debris will also be incorporated into the project to provide channel rearing and refuge habitat for salmon. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Project activities include the following: • Replace existing undersized culverts with a new box culvert to increase conveyance capacity and reduce flooding of SW 34`h Street and upstream storm pipe systems. • Construct stream bypass during provide dewatering of groundwater during construction. • Relocate utilities. • Provide a more natural and better-lined streambed to enhance fish passage. This includes adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert. • Provide riparian habitat planting including a mix of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Measurable Results include: • After project construction, observe lower water surface elevations in the channel upstream of SW 34 h Street during high flow events. • A year after construction complete, observe the establishment of native riparian plants in areas planted as part of project restoration. 4. Budget Expenses FBudgetm KCD Funds Other Funds Total id Benefits als/Milea e d Supplies Contracted/Professional $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 Services Land Acquisition Permits Other TOTAL $55,084.85 $844,915.15 J $900,000 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. H_Tile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1 I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD GrantsA 003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application_doc\AQtp King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Funding will be acknowledged,reported and tracked using the State of Washington Accounting and Reporting System or"BARS". The use of taxpayer funds provided through the King Conservation District for the above-described projects will be acknowledged through newspaper articles, websites or other information released during project implementation. Attachments Gregg Zi rman Date PBPW Ad str nor HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA l 1-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Cortespondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 1 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Project Name: Black River Channel Native Contact: Doris Yepez Plant Restoration Project Applicant: Doris Yepez Title: Project Coordinator Phase 1 Fiscal Agent: Seattle Audubon Society Phase 2 Fiscal Agent: Duwamish Tribe Principal Partners (if any): Address: 16444 SE 1351h St. City of Renton Renton,WA 98059 Friends of Black River Herons Forever Duwamish Tribe Total Project Cost: $53,559.00 Phone: 425 891-0730 KCD Funding Requested: $4,869.00 Fax: 425 917-0872 Project Start Date: 9/29/2004 E-mail: dorisdandelion ahoo.com Project End Date: Spring 2008 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): There are two phases to the Black River Channel Restoration Project, Phase 1 and Phase 2, and the funding requested covers both Phases. The goals for both Phases are to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, and develop community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. Phase 1 began September 29, 2004,and concludes in Spring 2007 with a commitment to maintain and monitor the restoration site for two years. The restoration area for Phase 1 is .83 of an acre in size and located on the south bank of the Black River Channel, off of Monster Road SW, adjacent and immediately downstream from the DNRP Black River Pump Station and upstream from the Monster Road Bridge. Much of the work has been completed to date and included: 1. The removal of invasive plants on the top 20 ft. of the riverbank and in the adjoining field. 2. The removal of 11 ecology blocks left on the property. 3. Scarification of the soil to loosen the gravelly soil on half of the field area. 4_ Digging planting holes with an auger. 5. Soil amendments. 6. The planting of 613 native trees,shrubs and forbs. 7. Installation of a drip irrigation system to increase the survival rate of the newly planted native vegetation. What remains is the monitoring and maintenance of the restoration site for the two year committed period. Phase 2 will begin in Fall 2005 and will conclude Spring 2008. Phase 2 is on the south bank as well, but immediately upstream from, and adjacent to,the DNRP Black River Pump Station. The restoration area is approximately ''/z acre in size. As in Phase 1,the goal is to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, as well as expand community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. The new site will also be monitored and maintained for two years. 2. Project Objectives(Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts,provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The project objectives are: • Provide shade, food sources and habitat improvements for the fish and wildlife through the removal of invasive weeds and the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs. • Acquaint the community and students with the Black River. • Educate the community and students about the Black River Channel Restoration Project and the Black River watershed, forest and channel ecosystem. • Involve the community and students in the restoration work. The following provides a brief description of specifically how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.450: "Watershed restoration projects--Intent. The legislature.declares that it is the goal of the state of Washington to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular, fish and wildlife and their habitat. It is further the policy of the state insofar as possible to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals." Description of how this project meets the first part of the criteria"to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular, fish and wildlife and their habitat": This project restores the riparian habitat along the Black River Channel and adjoining field, and improves the fish and wildlife habitat. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs restores the area to its more natural state. In addition,the native trees planted along the riverbank will provide shade that will keep the temperatures of the water at a more desirable level for salmonids. The debris from the trees and shrubs, leaves falling, will also provide a source of food for the fish; and fallen trees will act as LWD,(Large Woody Debris), which give salmon areas to rest and spawn. The field area, with the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs, will provide a buffer from the noise and pollution of the street, as well as provide a diversity of food sources for the other wildlife, producing berries and flowers at different times of year. Also, once grown in,the vegetation will provide more habitat areas for the wildlife. Description of how this project meets the second part of the criteria"to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals": During Phase 1, there were four community events: one day for planting,two others for mulching and weeding, and the last was the installation of the drip irrigation system.Numerous groups helped with these tasks including Renton Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, Campfire Girls, Herons Forever members,Friends of Black River, Duwamish tribal members, Sierra Club members,Boeing volunteers and the Briarwood Student Leadership Group. The same volunteer organizations will be asked to help with Phase 2 in order to increase the groups' sense of connection and commitment to the Black River and to give them the opportunity to see the growth and progress made through their participation in the restoration tasks during Phase 1. KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria As stated in the KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria, Section b ii): "Promoting Natural Habitat Restoration. The District will provide information and assistance to landowners, businesses, and other HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA l l-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application citizens in rural and urban areas on the preservation and restoration of natural habitats including the creation of low-maintenance native plant habitats that conserve water and are friendly to wildlife, eco- landscaping, establishing naturescaping demonstration sites, intrusive species management and community stewardship". Description of how this project meets this criteria: The restoration work included, in Phase 1, the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field area, as well as the removal of other invasive shrubs such as the Butterfly bush. Maintenance of the restoration site includes weeding, specifically focusing on removing the new growth of Himalayan blackberries and Butterfly bush, and removing other weeds on the site that are on the Washington State and/or King County Noxious Weed List, namely, Tansy ragwort, Bull thistle and Oxeye daisy. Other invasive weeds will be removed as needed. Phase 2 also calls for the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field areas, and the removal of other noxious weeds present, which include Japanese knotweed. During Phase 1, community stewardship has been developed through the involvement of the different volunteer organizations in the restoration tasks and in the presentation of the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to four different groups. As stated in the KCD Strategic Initiative Section d, i): "Population Growth and Increased Urbanization. The District will actively promote workable solutions that help minimize the effects of population growth and increased urbanization on the natural environment." Description of how this project meets these criteria: When the planted native trees get larger,they will create a dense wooded area, a small forest, in a highly urbanized setting. The planting of trees in urban areas is very beneficial to the environment. Trees absorb contaminants, control erosion,reduce storm- water run-off by absorbing water through their roots, clean the air, and as stated above, are beneficial to the fish and wildlife by providing more shade, additional food sources and habitat. The trees, with the falling of large wooded debris, also enhance our stream systems. The grassy, field area that was part of the restoration site in Phase 1 was under laid with gravel to accommodate the trucks when the Black River Pump Station was built. One of the restoration tasks, during Phase 1, included ripping up the gravelly field and planting native trees, shrubs and forbs. Mulch was also added throughout the field area. The addition of mulch, and the decomposition of native vegetation in the future, will enrich the soil and help rebuild it. KCD Regional Funding Principles As stated in the # 3 KCD Regional Funding Principles, iv), "Water quality and watershed restoration and protection support services such as coordination of monitoring(data collection, studies, evaluation)and public education programs". Description of how this project meets this criterion: During Phase 2, community involvement will expand to include the Renton schools and other local schools. Presently, there are two Renton schools, Lindbergh High School and Black River High School, which have provided written commitments to involve their students in hands-on learning at the Black River, as well as introducing a Black River component into their science curriculum. The Black River Riparian Forest, Channel and restoration areas will be used as a living laboratory for students to learn about scientific methods and concepts and to learn about the Black River and its components. HA\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application1doc King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The Black River Restoration Project will also be included as an option in a tour sponsored by the King County Waste Treatment program, Wheels to Water. A visit to the South Treatment Plant will include a tour of the Black River and the opportunity to participate in restoration tasks or learn about the history and components of the Black River through a walking tour of the Forest, Channel and restoration sites. In addition to the above, the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation shown to different groups during Phase 1, helped educate the public about the restoration work and the Black River. The PowerPoint presentations will also be shown to new groups participating in Phase 2. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Phase 1: 1. Removal of invasive weeds: Himalayan blackberries were rampant on the riverbank and on a small vegetation island in the middle of the field. There were a few other invasives such as the Butterfly bush, but the Himalayan blackberry was the predominant invasive weed with a 50- 60%ground cover on the riverbank and a 3 5% ground cover on the island. Most of the invasive blackberries on the restoration site have been eradicated through the cutting and grubbing of the blackberries. Earthcorps was hired to cut and grub the blackberries on the top 20 ft. of the bank. Volunteers and salaried crew have removed the remainder of the blackberries on the island, and have been tackling the new growth of the Himalayan blackberry that is popping up throughout the site. A salaried person has also been cutting blackberries on the lower part of the bank, beyond the 20 ft., and throughout the site. 2. Removal of ecology blocks: There were I 1 ecology blocks on the site before the project began. These have all been removed with the help of King County roads crew. 3. Ripping up of the gravelly field: Before the restoration work, the entire field area was grown over with grass and under laid with gravel that was deposited when the Black River Pump Station was built. It was almost impossible to dig into the field to plant native vegetation since the ground was so compacted. Half of the gravelly field was ripped up with the use of a backhoe,to allow for planting, and now the soil is looser. Thrushes were observed, on at least two different occasions, pecking at the soil since it has been loosened. The backhoe also removed the other invasive shrubs that were in the island. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger: In the other half of the gravelly field, 20 rows of planting holes were dug with an auger. The field area is being used as a test site to see which side produces better results,the augured field area or the area where the backhoe ripped up the gravel and grass. 5. Soil amendments: Approximately 60 cubic yards of mulch was spread throughout the field area of the restoration site beginning January 2005 through May 2005. The mulch helps with weed control; helps keep some moisture close to the newly planted native vegetation,and will enhance the soil as it decays. The soil in the field area is nutrient poor, and some plants are in need of fertilizer. Biosolids are in the process of being purchased from the South Waste Treatment Plant to place around the plants that need some fertilizing. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs: Most of the native plants were planted in January 2005. Some were planted in February 2005, and approximately 10 more were donated and planted in May 2005. There has been less than a 2% mortality rate, and those were mostly the Pacific madrones, which have the reputation of being difficult to plant. 7. Installation of the drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system was installed in April 2005. A drip system is crucial at this site, especially in the field area, since the soil is very well-drained and does not retain water. A few of the native plants had yellowed a little with the early heat spell in February/March, but once the drip irrigation system was running, the plants regained their healthy, green look. The drip irrigation system is attached to the faucet at the Pump Station HAFile Sys1SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1 I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 5 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application and is turned on at least 4 times a week by the Pump Station crew, and occasionally on hot and dry weekends, by the restoration project coordinator. 8. Community involvement: The community has shown interest and support, evidenced with the large numbers of participants. For rivo of the community activity days, there were over 50 volunteers helping on each of those days. 9. Monitoring and maintenance: The project is being monitored and maintained at least twice a month. Partners to the grant, Herons Forever and Friends of Black River members,are helping with the maintenance and monitoring. Monitoring includes tracking the condition of the native vegetation, the growth of the invasive weeds, checking the drip irrigation system and noting any wildlife in the area. Maintenance includes protecting the native vegetation from being eaten, if necessary; removing the invasive weeds by either weed whacking, or manually cutting then grubbing, as in the case of the blackberries; replacing dead native vegetation and repairing, if necessary, the drip irrigation system. Monitoring and maintenance is very important in helping the native plants thrive as well as ensuring that they will not be out competed by the invasive weeds or eaten by wildlife. The project activities and measurable results for Phase 2 include: 1. Planning and organizing: A Scope of Work Budget for King County needs to be completed before December 2005. Dates for the different restoration tasks need to be set, vendors need to be contacted, materials need to be purchased, subcontractors need to be lined up, requests for payments and other paperwork need to be submitted to King County throughout the project. Other grant paperwork needs to be completed including a report to KCD. Reports are submitted to partners on a regular basis. Media will be solicited for the various community events. Planning and organizing is critical for the project to run smoothly and to get the needed tasks done. 2. Contacting different volunteer organizations: Different volunteer organizations will be contacted to help with the native planting, mulching and installation of the drip irrigation system. Involving the community will develop community stewardship of the Black River. We will attempt to involve the same organizations as last year, to strengthen community stewardship, and contact new groups as well. The new groups will be shown the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to acquaint them with the Black River and to build some desire and enthusiasm to help with the restoration tasks. 3. Contacting Lindbergh and Black River High Schools to set up dates for student participation in the restoration project and discuss the specifics of the addition of the Black River into the science curriculum. 4. Developing a tour schedule with the Wheels to Water Program and writing up an oral presentation for the tour. 5. Removing invasive weeds: The invasive weeds account for at least 90%of the present groundcover, and most of the weeds are Himalayan blackberry. The weeds need to be removed in order to plant native vegetation. The roots of the weeds will be removed to inhibit the return growth of the weeds. The abundant Himalayan blackberries create a monoculture with a food source that has limited value since it is not eaten by much of the wildlife. 6. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs: Approximately 500 trees, shrubs and forbs will be planted with numerous species of each.Native vegetation will enhance the area by providing food sources, shade and habitat for the wildlife; and a diversity of native vegetation will provide a variety of food and habitat sources.Native trees will also control erosion, storm-water run-off, clean the air and absorb contaminants in the soil. 7. Soil amendments: Mulch will be added around the areas where the native vegetation is planted. Mulch will help retain the moisture in the soil, control weeds as well as enrich the soil as it decays. A natural fertilizer, such as biosolids, will be added as necessary. H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 6 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 8. Installing a drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system will keep the native vegetation hydrated and increase their chance of survival. Watering is critical especially during the area's dry summer months. 9. Maintenance and monitoring of the restoration site: Monitoring includes checking and recording the condition of the native plants, the drip irrigation system, the growth of the invasive weeds and wildlife activity. Maintenance involves repairing the drip irrigation system, removing the growing weeds, replacing dead native plants and protecting the native plants from being eaten by wildlife. Frequent maintenance and monitoring will help keep the invasive growth from getting out of control and help insure the successful growth of the native vegetation as well as catch any other problems that come up. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Other Total King County Funds Waterworks (specify) Grant Salaries and Benefits $1,034 $14,000 $15,034 Travel/Meals/Mileage $253 $2,043 $2,296 Office/Field Supplies $3,489 $12,728 $16,217 Contracted/Professional $15,138 $15,138 Services Land Acquisition Permits $93 97 190 Other(Fiscal Agents) $4,684 $4,684 TOTAL $4,869 1 $48,690 $53,559 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. The KCD contribution will be noted on the signs that will be placed at the two restoration sites upon the termination of the project. King County has been advised that KCD funds will potentially be the source of the cash match for the project for both phases. Any newspaper articles or photos will acknowledge KCD as a contributor to the project. KCD will be acknowledged as a contributor and partner in the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation. KCD will also be mentioned and acknowledged in other correspondence related to the project. Oar, &-zX, :V&e regg Zi r Date PBPW Ad strator HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1 l-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc RENTON SHOPPING 4"." AV 4)86 S H bkh s ENTER M 4e,,o RD ORRIS AV S HILLS CREEK --R%U VALLEY -------- pANTHER CREEK WEILAND GENCRAL HO -L.Ay U �e4 136*x48*BOX 36* I . -.-. I —---------- ♦ ji, f .................. RD 8" ...... E VALLEY VALLEY !jr .Lv�iVvnl L I 4r jJ-1 405 ID-11 LIND 6Cr AV S --------- AV SW 34 Street Culvert ji. 31.. ............... Replacement P zs -T - Iz- NECA roject 3L 21- ow SCALE i'=i NE is THOMAS AV SW "i ............ P(WELL AV SW CONNECTING i r i Al ! CHANNEL PROJECT Z 1 (COMUTED 60' 1995) -7� OAKESDALE AV SW LEGEND 36 cw VNM AREA ' 36r XIy (STUDY AREA) 36" DIAMETER STORM DRAIN — ------► STREAM/DRAINAGE CHANNEL >----< CULVERT(S) aj JACKSON sw PUMP STATION -3,\ ILL CREEK FLOOD WATER RR- POND TUKWILA STORAGE RENTON CITY LIMITS ---72"d AV., EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER BLACk\\ ...... WATERSHED PROJECT RR X\ WEST VALLCY RIVER HWY FIGURE 6-2 PUMP STATION RENTON VALLEY AREA EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO GREEN-DUWAMISH RIVER t Black River ',..-� East Side C�en River King County 1 Watershed l3undar Water Quality `'"� y Management Plan r Study Arearj ` �'f eew ,r''•' ,� � 7 Panther Lake 0 1 I j \ � 405 r LKing Count Garrison r I jRenton, Creek 1 j j { Renton j j i 1 1 U er J King County r-j _ Sprirj Valley Area N 167 Kent — Lr Springbrook Creek East Valle Rood (✓/��, Springbrook 1 N Creek Renton fvl;ll O ukwila 167 Block River een Kent U) Pump Station Tukwila i 181 1 181 1 .i i j ..... j I ^l N Tukwila N Kent Kent Lagoons .77 — s i 1 A � I-5 `� �'%�e� EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER $ WATERSHED PROJECT —— FIGURE 6-1 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET E— t PROJECT AREA E AGREEMENT FOR AWARD OF NONCOMPETITIVE GRANT City of Renton This Agreement is made between the King Conservation District Number 9, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 935 Powell Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 (referred to herein as "District"), and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 1055 South Grady Way, Renton Washington 98055 (referred to herein as "Recipient"), for the purposes set forth herein. SECTION 1. RECITALS 1.1 Whereas, the District is a special purpose district organized and existing under authority of Chapter 89.08 RCW. The District engages in and provides certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and 1.2 Whereas, on December 15, 2000, the Metropolitan King County Council enacted King County Ordinance No. 14016 which, among other things,provides for the distribution of noncompetitive grant funds from a portion of the special assessments imposed by King County Ordinance No. 14016 and collected by the District pursuant to Chapter 89.08 RCW; and 1.3 Whereas, on November 19, 1998, the District adopted Resolution No. 98-20 relating to the policy and procedures governing the District's award of any noncompetitive grants authorized by King County; and 1.4 Whereas, the District has reviewed the grant application submitted by Recipient and has determined that the application meets the requirements of Chapter 89.08 RCW and the District's policy and procedures for awarding noncompetitive grants; and 1.5 Whereas, the District and Recipient desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of establishing the terms and conditions relating to the District's award of a noncompetitive grant to Recipient. SECTION 2. AGREEMENT 2.1 The District agrees to award Recipient a grant in the total amount of Fifty-five thousand eighty-four dollars and 85 cents ($55,084.85) ($10,618.51 from 2002 Assessments, $16,271.58 from 2003 Assessments, $16,656.05 from 2004 Assessments, and $11,538.71 from 2005 Assessments). Grant funds shall be used by Recipient solely for the performance of the work described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The District shall pay the grant funds to Recipient in accordance with the following paragraphs. 2.1.1 Grant funds from 2002, 2003, and 2004 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient within five (5) business days after District's receipt of a fully executed Agreement. - 1 - 2.1.2 Grant funds from 2005 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient on or before January 31, 2005, provided that such funds have been collected and received by the District and thereafter in quarterly installments as funds are received. 2.2 Recipient represents and warrants that it will only use the grant funds for the work described in Exhibit A, which may be amended by the parties pursuant to Paragraph 3.3 of the Agreement. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized work. Further, Recipient agrees to return to the District any grant funds that are not expended and/or remain after completion of the work covered by this Agreement. 2.3 Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the grant funds may only be expended on work which shall be entirely within the District's jurisdictional boundaries. The following municipal entities are not within the District's jurisdictional boundaries: Enumclaw, Federal Way, Milton, Pacific, and Skykomish. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for work performed outside the District's jurisdictional boundaries. 2.4 In the event the scope of work authorized by this Agreement includes the use of grant funds to purchase houses located on real property within a flood hazard area, Recipient acknowledges and agrees that grant funds may only be used for such purposes if the houses to be purchased were constructed before floodplain mapping or sensitive areas regulations were in place for that area. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized purposes. 2.5 Recipient shall be required to provide the District with biannual financial and project progress reports, along with an annual summary report. Financial and project reports shall be due May 31 and November 30 each year. The Recipient shall also be required to submit to the District a final report which documents the Recipient's completion of the work in conformance with this Agreement within thirty(30) days after the completion of the work. The final report shall, among other things, summarize the project's successes and shall address the regional benefits accomplished by the work. The final report shall also identify any obstacles or challenges which were encountered during the work, along with general recommendations regarding ways to avoid such obstacles or challenges in the future. If requested, Recipient agrees to provide the District with additional financial or progress reports from time to time, at reasonable intervals. 2.6 Recipient's expenditures of grant funds shall be separately identified in the Recipient's accounting records. If requested, Recipient shall comply with other reasonable requests made by the District with respect to the manner in which project expenditures are tracked and accounted for in Recipient's accounting books and records. Recipient shall maintain such records of expenditures as may be necessary to conform to generally accepted accounting principals and to meet the requirements of all applicable state and federal laws. - 2 - 2.7 Recipient shall be required to track project expenses using the Budget Accounting and Reporting System for the State of Washington("BARS"). 2.8 The District or its representative shall have the right from time to time, at reasonable intervals, to audit the Recipient's books and records in order to verify compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Recipient shall cooperate with the District in any such audit. 2.9 Recipient shall retain all accounting records and project files relating to this Agreement in accordance with criteria established in the Revised Code of Washington and the Washington State Archivist. 2.10 Recipient shall ensure that all work performed by Recipient or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors is performed in a manner which protects and safeguards the environment and natural resources and which is in compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations. Recipient shall implement an appropriate monitoring system or program to ensure compliance with this provision. 2.11 Recipient agrees that in the event a court of competent jurisdiction finds that the imposition or collection of the special assessments authorized by King County Ordinance No. 14016 are unlawful and orders the repayment of such assessments, Recipient agrees to reimburse the District for the full amount of the grant award, including any interest which may be awarded by the court. 2.12 Recipient agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, its agents, officers, officials and employees from all claims, alleged liability, damages, losses to or death of person or damage to property allegedly resulting from the acts of the Recipient or any of its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. 2.13 Recipient agrees to acknowledge the District as a source of funding for this project on all literature, signage or press releases related to said project. SECTION 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 3.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No prior or contemporaneous representation, inducement, promise or agreement between or among the parties which relate to the subject matter hereof which are not embodied in this Agreement shall be of any force or effect. 3.3 No amendment to this Agreement shall be binding on any of the parties to this Agreement unless such amendment is in writing and is executed by the parties. The parties - 3 - contemplate that this Agreement may from time to time be modified by written amendment which shall be executed by duly authorized representatives of the parties and attached to this Agreement. 3.4 Each party warrants and represents that such party has full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement and each person executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents that he/she has been fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and that such party is bound by the signature of such representative. 3.5 Expenditure of grant funds shall be subject to appropriation by the Metropolitan King County Council. DISTRICT: RECIPIENT: By By Name Name Title Title Date Date Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form: DISTRICT LEGAL COUNSEL: RECIPIENT'S ATTORNEY: By By Name ( i �. ; �al1a � Name Date ) ". I c S Date - 4 - Exhibit A Project Name: SW 341h Street Culvert Contact: Allen Quynn Replacement Project Applicant: City of Renton Title: Project Manager Principal Partners (if any): Address: 1055 S.Grady Way City of Renton Renton,WA 98055 Total Project Cost: $900,000 estimated Phone: 425-430-7247 KCD Funding Requested: $55,084.85 Fax: 425-430-7247 Project Start Date: April 2005 E-mail: a u nn ci.renton.wa.us Project End Date: Fall 2007 1. Brief Project Description(—200 words): The purpose of this project is to replace the existing Springbrook Creek culvert crossing of SW 341h Street in Renton, Washington. The crossing consists of 4 existing, undersized corrugated metal (CMP) culverts that will be replaced with a new box culvert. Springbrook Creek is the main drainage channel for the 24-square mile Black River Basin that includes portions of the Cities of Renton, Kent, Tukwila and unincorporated King County. Springbrook Creek drains to the Black River Pump Station where flows are pumped into the Green River(see attached figures 6-1 and 6-2). The fisheries resources within Springbrook Creek include Chinook and Coho salmon, steelhead and cutthroat trout. The existing culverts were constructed in 1980 and are a major restriction of flows that contribute to the flooding problems in portions of the south valley during storm events. The project consists of the following elements: • Construction of a new box culvert including stream bypass. • Placement of spawning gravel in the bottom of the culvert. • Placement of woody debris on the sides of the channel. • Planting of riparian trees and shrubs along channel bank. 2. Project Objectives(Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts,provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): The project will accomplish the following objectives: • Eliminate flooding of the SW 34`h Street/Springbrook Creek crossing during the 100-yr storm event. • Lower upstream water levels, which will increase the capacity of local storm systems in Lind Avenue and SW 34`h Street. • Upsizing the SW 34`h Street culvert in conjunction with future pipe system improvements will help the City meet flood protection goals in the valley. • Provide improved fish passage and riparian habitat for salmonid migration. The following provides a brief description of how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.01: "To prepare and keep current a comprehensive long-range program recommending the conservation of all the renewable natural resources of the District. Such King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application programs shall be directed toward the best use of renewable natural resources and in a manner that will best meet the needs of the District and the state, taking into consideration, where appropriate, such uses as farming, grazing,timber supply, forest, parks, outdoor recreation, potable water supplies for urban and rural areas, water for agriculture, minimal flow,and industrial uses, watershed stabilization, control of soil erosion,retardation of water run-off, flood prevention and control, reservoirs and other water storage, restriction of developments of flood plains, protection of open space and scenery, preservation of natural beauty, protection of fish and wildlife, preservation of wilderness areas and wild rivers,the prevention or reduction of sedimentation and other pollution in rivers and other waters, and such location of highways, schools, housing developments, industries, airports and other facilities and structures as will fit the needs of the state and be consistent with the best uses of the renewable natural resources of the state. The program shall include an inventory of all renewable natural resources in the District, a compilation of current resource needs, projections of future resource requirements, priorities for various resource activities, projected timetables, descriptions of available alternatives, and provisions for coordination with other resource programs. Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project meets the above criteria by reducing flooding of SW 34`h Street as well as upstream storm systems that discharge to Springbrook Creek. The new culvert will be designed to prevent flooding of the SW 34`h Street crossing during the 100-yr storm event and lower tail water conditions for outfalls discharging upstream. The project will also help protect fish by lowering stream velocities during storm events through the new culvert to facilitate fish passage. KCD Strategic Plan Initiate: This proposal meets the strategic plan element 2,d(iii)Support for Regional Conservation Initiatives, which states: "The District will join in regional conservation initiatives,lending its leadership and expertise on issues such as major river flooding,preserving and restoring fish habitat,protecting and restoring water quality in watersheds and general public conservation education programs in the region". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is one element of a series of projects recommended in the City of Renton's 1997 East Side Green River Watershed Plan and EIS (ESGRWP), which was a basin wide planning level study to identify projects that would help reduce the flooding in the Renton valley area. The ESGRWP identified the replacement of the SW 346 Street crossing of Springbrook Creek to reduce upstream water levels and improve fish passage. As discussed under the previous criteria,the proposed project will eliminate flooding of SW 30 Street during the 100-yr storm as well as reduce flooding in local storm systems upstream that discharge to the creek. The project will also improve water quality and provide wildlife habitat with the addition of riparian plantings such as native shrubs and trees along the channel bank. In-stream woody debris will also be added to provide fish rearing and refuge habitat. Springbrook Creek is within Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA)9. The draft WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan identifies the need for improving fish passage riparian habitat and water quality to benefit Chinook salmon and other salmonids. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Regional Funding Principles Established by the King County Regional Task Force The project satisfies regional task force funding principles criteria 3,1(ii),which states: "Habitat restoration which enhances ecological significant fish runs". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is located on Springbrook Creek, which historically has poor water quality,particularly low dissolved oxygen due to high water temperatures. The basin, especially the valley floor has become highly urbanized with large commercial and industrial areas that directly discharge to Springbrook Creek. This project will address water quality by planting plants and trees along the channel bank that will help provide shade and help cool the creek during the summer months. Woody debris will also be incorporated into the project to provide channel rearing and refuge habitat for salmon. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Project activities include the following: • Replace existing undersized culverts with a new box culvert to increase conveyance capacity and reduce flooding of SW 34`h Street and upstream storm pipe systems. • Construct stream bypass during provide dewatering of groundwater during construction. • Relocate utilities. • Provide a more natural and better-lined streambed to enhance fish passage. This includes adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert. • Provide riparian habitat planting including a mix of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Measurable Results include: • After project construction, observe lower water surface elevations in the channel upstream of SW 34`h Street during high flow events. • A year after construction complete, observe the establishment of native riparian plants in areas planted as part of project restoration. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Total City of Renton Salaries and Benefits Travel/Meals/Mileage Office/Field Su lies Contracted/Professional $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 Services Land Acquisition Permits Other TOTAL $55,084.85 $844,915.15 1 $900,000 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Funding will be acknowledged, reported and tracked using the State of Washington Accounting and Reporting System or"BARS". The use of taxpayer funds provided through the King Conservation District for the above-described projects will be acknowledged through newspaper articles,websites or other information released during project implementation. Attachments L Gregg Z rman Date PBPW Ad 'str �or HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp NEE N€ R�\5 , .SidiTHER E k S' i" -0 , - .. .. REN TON1. f =z' SHOPPING a E _ - -- , , = --------__-- 9 CENTER ! __._....• B` _ p\� b' 4 I � ...__.: �i MORRIS AV S O - -- - Q� ._...... ....._._......._._ ... - .. T - HILLS CREEKs ,' WHIT V„ �.. Z RO LINGE Rp' oKO: Co r- - ......_..._ _..._. 9_ --- .... L' > , , SHATTUCK :: ; •; E_,., f - _-, __.._.._ _ - SHATTUCK 1' -- —�_ L:..~;••:N ;t ,.. '� o oOfi _- A ��- n --; -- ; - VAL EY S B i 5, L __ --� ___ i TAL'' 6R ANTHER CREEK LAND QQ GENERAL --- -- ==- P - - - - HOSPITAL , , "S� - - s --r E \� 167 ............. �.� i Rp\ --- f Y Vol _.._._... •---._____.-------_.. . - 36x48 BOX 6 LLJ — -SR — 60 36 �\;�. ,,.•/>� C- PJ N: : oa,: ;; := �g ;:: ,' 3 18 � - :_� . = c> - -....................... ---�- ....... D _..._..-E VALLEY RD VALLEY Ra _.... ,. , Ak ,`� •Z ,'s •� ---- i_ y€ cD "—'+�' N? , Op ..'.`..•,i j'1' ! 'at% `�...._— t/� > (/�,:: ! 2 N: i I N i N' - _ E _ sE p __......-- - - ;; 14 _ LIN AV S -'-...... .._-.--- ...._ - -- - - } i t: -min AV.. sw ; t.. , v - - ..... , j: Street Culvert t ` �s eet -' -' { i SW 34 SENECA N: , ! placement Project , _ s 21 -------------- to i All Ns , SCALE 1 w-1000 THOMAS AV SWbi + ------ :N j - ' -— - , : , / POWELL AV SW ' n' ::_.. € M a CONNECTING %` o CHANNEL PROJECT ' (COMPLETEDEn 5' 60 --- ' _.... ..._............._...__...__.. __. -'-- -._... .................. ....... E ; 1995) KESDALE AV SW ... =t R �, 36 LEGEND VALLEY AREA 36" I g • <e I: (STUDY AREA) 36 DIAMETER STORM DRAIN �p E `E1I m f w >: i M Z ' °O --► STREAM/DRAINAGE CHANNEL ! 3E !fir a > < CULVERT(S) � # E � ` • JACKS oN sw V PUMP STATION t; - --`_ - <•-' — t' CREEK �E MI LL FLOOD WATER .___.._r......... ,��.,�_ __, TUKWILA STORAGE POND ,; �� .,,��;�• - ------- �'-�--- RENTON CITY - --------- -- -- - - -- , , , r� �� i - EAST SIDE ,. i � d AV_.. LIMITS WATERSHED GREEN RIVER s ' 5 K= zf� = -- '�, - WEST VALLEY ---- RIVER R _ FIGURE 6-2 _ -- PUMP �� -- =3 { �`�., RENTON VALLEY AREA STATION \ j , 1 t EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM 3 \. €. TO GREEN-DUWAMISH 'E RIVER 5 _ East Side GE�n River Black River King Ca ounty - Watershed undary Water Quality ,•' Management Plan ,.•es,.' ��,.•^-�� r__.s_+ Study Area ••.� / �. •, ��.,, I .�' � [.. �''�• t eel /� •.•�'- �`� •.G ,�', L.-�t�• .�'• ,•'� �... -� ( ire Panther Lake �•, 405 L LKing Count Garrison 1 .•'�� 1 05 �rj Rent°n-! Creek { •' Renton rj _ .� i ._.J •� King County r-j1 ��. r•f rj �. SI,>ringbrook•fir. C._.-._ �.-.-.-.j ��''_.`'� rj Valley Area _ 167 Kent L Springbrook Creek f-ast Valle Road Springbrook Creek j `- Renton l� Cr 167 Tukwila i -ems ••••'• % - � { Black River i� een Kent co i TUk 181 181 � -- --•--- - -•1 j Pump Station i wit° N Kent � Tukwila Kent ,...-..-� ,•- Lagoons ;A,-' 11, r..i EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER 1-5 WATERSHED PROJECT s J 0 3000 6000 a, > x FIGURE 6-1 0 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET �\ x � PROJECT AREA x AGREEMENT FOR AWARD OF NONCOMPETITIVE GRANT Black River Watershed Alliance This Agreement is made between the King Conservation District Number 9, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 935 Powell Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 (referred to herein as "District"), and the Black River Watershed Alliance, a non-profit organization in King County, Washington, located at 16444 SE 135" Street, Renton Washington 98059 (referred to herein as "Recipient"), for the purposes set forth herein. SECTION 1. RECITALS 1.1 Whereas, the District is a special purpose district organized and existing under authority of Chapter 89.08 RCW. The District engages in and provides certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and 1.2 Whereas, on December 15, 2000, the Metropolitan King County Council enacted King County Ordinance No. 14016 which, among other things,provides for the distribution of noncompetitive grant funds from a portion of the special assessments imposed by King County Ordinance No. 14016 and collected by the District pursuant to Chapter 89.08 RCW; and 1.3 Whereas, on November 19, 1998, the District adopted Resolution No. 98-20 relating to the policy and procedures governing the District's award of any noncompetitive grants authorized by King County; and 1.4 Whereas, the District has reviewed the grant application submitted by Recipient and has determined that the application meets the requirements of Chapter 89.08 RCW and the District's policy and procedures for awarding noncompetitive grants; and 1.5 Whereas, the District and Recipient desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of establishing the terms and conditions relating to the District's award of a noncompetitive grant to Recipient. SECTION 2. AGREEMENT 2.1 The District agrees to award Recipient a grant in the total amount of Four thousand eight-hundred sixty-nine Dollars ($4,869) from 2002 Assessments. Grant funds shall be used by Recipient solely for the performance of the work described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Grant funds from 2002 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient within five (5)business days after District's receipt of a fully executed Agreement. 2.2 Recipient represents and warrants that it will only use the grant funds for the work described in Exhibit A, which may be amended by the parties pursuant to Paragraph 3.3 of the - 1 - Agreement. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized work. Further, Recipient agrees to return to the District any grant funds that are not expended and/or remain after completion of the work covered by this Agreement. 2.3 Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the grant funds may only be expended on work which shall be entirely within the District's jurisdictional boundaries. The following municipal entities are not within the District's jurisdictional boundaries: Enumclaw, Federal Way, Milton, Pacific, and Skykomish. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for work performed outside the District's jurisdictional boundaries. 2.4 In the event the scope of work authorized by this Agreement includes the use of grant funds to purchase houses located on real property within a flood hazard area, Recipient acknowledges and agrees that grant funds may only be used for such purposes if the houses to be purchased were constructed before floodplain mapping or sensitive areas regulations were in place for that area. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized purposes. 2.5 Recipient shall be required to provide the District with biannual financial and project progress reports, along with an annual summary report. Financial and project reports shall be due May 31 and November 30 each year. The Recipient shall also be required to submit to the District a final report which documents the Recipient's completion of the work in conformance with this Agreement within thirty(30) days after the completion of the work. The final report shall, among other things, summarize the project's successes and shall address the regional benefits accomplished by the work. The final report shall also identify any obstacles or challenges which were encountered during the work, along with general recommendations regarding ways to avoid such obstacles or challenges in the future. If requested, Recipient agrees to provide the District with additional financial or progress reports from time to time, at reasonable intervals. 2.6 Recipient's expenditures of grant funds shall be separately identified in the Recipient's accounting records. If requested, Recipient shall comply with other reasonable requests made by the District with respect to the manner in which project expenditures are tracked and accounted for in Recipient's accounting books and records. Recipient shall maintain such records of expenditures as may be necessary to conform to generally accepted accounting principals and to meet the requirements of all applicable state and federal laws. 2.7 Recipient shall be required to track project expenses using the Budget Accounting and Reporting System for the State of Washington ("BARS"). 2.8 The District or its representative shall have the right from time to time, at reasonable intervals, to audit the Recipient's books and records in order to verify compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Recipient shall cooperate with the District in any such audit. 2.9 Recipient shall retain all accounting records and project files relating to this Agreement in accordance with criteria established in the Revised Code of Washington and the Washington State Archivist. - 2 - 2.10 Recipient shall ensure that all work performed by Recipient or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors is performed in a manner which protects and safeguards the environment and natural resources and which is in compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations. Recipient shall implement an appropriate monitoring system or program to ensure compliance with this provision. 2.11 Recipient agrees that in the event a court of competent jurisdiction finds that the imposition or collection of the special assessments authorized by King County Ordinance No. 14016 are unlawful and orders the repayment of such assessments, Recipient agrees to reimburse the District for the full amount of the grant award, including any interest which may be awarded by the court. 2.12 Recipient agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, its agents, officers, officials and employees from all claims, alleged liability, damages, losses to or death of person or damage to property allegedly resulting from the acts of the Recipient or any of its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. 2.13 Recipient agrees to acknowledge the District as a source of funding for this project on all literature, signage or press releases related to said project. SECTION 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 3.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No prior or contemporaneous representation, inducement, promise or agreement between or among the parties which relate to the subject matter hereof which are not embodied in this Agreement shall be of any force or effect. 3.3 No amendment to this Agreement shall be binding on any of the parties to this Agreement unless such amendment is in writing and is executed by the parties. The parties contemplate that this Agreement may from time to time be modified by written amendment which shall be executed by duly authorized representatives of the parties and attached to this Agreement. 3.4 Each party warrants and represents that such party has full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement and each person executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents that he/she has been fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and that such party is bound by the signature of such representative. 3.5 Expenditure of grant funds shall be subject to appropriation by the Metropolitan King County Council. - 3 - DISTRICT: RECIPIENT: By By Name Name Title Title Date Date Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form: DISTRICT LEGAL COUNSEL: RECIPIENT'S ATTORNEY: By l ilrc. � �i�t By Name �r Fr M Name Date 1 l S 1 c Date -4 - Exhibit A King Conservation District 1 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Project Name: Black River Channel Native Contact: Doris Yepez Plant Restoration Project Applicant: Doris Yepez Title: Project Coordinator Phase 1 Fiscal Agent: Seattle Audubon Society Phase 2 Fiscal Agent: D Principal Partners (if any): Address: 16444 SE 135`h St. City of Renton Renton,WA 98059 Friends of Black River Herons Forever Duwamish Tribe Total Project Cost: $53,559.00 Phone: 425 891-0730 KCD Funding Requested: $4,869.00 Fax: 425 917-0872 Project Start Date: 9/29/2004 E-mail: dorisdandelion ahoo.com Project End Date: Spring 2008 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): There are two phases to the Black River Channel Restoration Project, Phase I and Phase 2, and the funding requested covers both Phases. The goals for both Phases are to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, and develop community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. Phase 1 began September 29, 2004, and concludes in Spring 2007 with a commitment to maintain and monitor the restoration site for two years. The restoration area for Phase 1 is .83 of an acre in size and located on the south bank of the Black River Channel, off of Monster Road SW, adjacent and immediately downstream from the DNRP Black River Pump Station and upstream from the Monster Road Bridge. Much of the work has been completed to date and included: 1. The removal of invasive plants on the top 20 ft. of the riverbank and in the adjoining field. 2. The removal of 11 ecology blocks left on the property. 3. Scarification of the soil to loosen the gravelly soil on half of the field area. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger. 5. Soil amendments. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs. T Installation of a drip irrigation system to increase the survival rate of the newly planted native vegetation. What remains is the monitoring and maintenance of the restoration site for the two year committed period. Phase 2 will begin in Fall 2005 and will conclude Spring 2008. Phase 2 is on the south bank as well, but immediately upstream from, and adjacent to,the DNRP Black River Pump Station. The restoration area is approximately '/2 acre in size. As in Phase 1,the goal is to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, as well as expand community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. The new site will also be monitored and maintained for two years. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts,provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The project objectives are: • Provide shade, food sources and habitat improvements for the fish and wildlife through the removal of invasive weeds and the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs. • Acquaint the community and students with the Black River. • Educate the community and students about the Black River Channel Restoration Project and the Black River watershed, forest and channel ecosystem. • Involve the community and students in the restoration work. The following provides a brief description of specifically how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.450: "Watershed restoration projects--Intent. The legislature declares that it is the goal of the state of Washington to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular,fish and wildlife and their habitat. It is further the policy of the state insofar as possible to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals." Description of how this project meets the first part of the criteria"to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular,fish and wildlife and their habitat": This project restores the riparian habitat along the Black River Channel and adjoining field, and improves the fish and wildlife habitat. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs restores the area to its more natural state. In addition,the native trees planted along the riverbank will provide shade that will keep the temperatures of the water at a more desirable level for salmonids. The debris from the trees and shrubs, leaves falling, will also provide a source of food for the fish; and fallen trees will act as LWD,(Large Woody Debris),which give salmon areas to rest and spawn. The field area,with the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs, will provide a buffer from the noise and pollution of the street, as well as provide a diversity of food sources for the other wildlife,producing berries and flowers at different times of year. Also, once grown in,the vegetation will provide more habitat areas for the wildlife. Description of how this project meets the second part of the criteria"to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals": During Phase 1,there were four community events: one day for planting,two others for mulching and weeding, and the last was the installation of the drip irrigation system.Numerous groups helped with these tasks including Renton Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, Campfire Girls,Herons Forever members,Friends of Black River,Duwamish tribal members, Sierra Club members, Boeing volunteers and the Briarwood Student Leadership Group. The same volunteer organizations will be asked to help with Phase 2 in order to increase the groups' sense of connection and commitment to the Black River and to give them the opportunity to see the growth and progress made through their participation in the restoration tasks during Phase 1. KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria As stated in the KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria, Section b ii): "Promoting Natural Habitat Restoration. The District will provide information and assistance to landowners, businesses, and other HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application citizens in rural and urban areas on the preservation and restoration of natural habitats including the creation of low-maintenance native plant habitats that conserve water and are friendly to wildlife, eco- landscaping, establishing naturescaping demonstration sites, intrusive species management and community stewardship". Description of how this project meets this criteria: The restoration work included, in Phase 1,the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field area, as well as the removal of other invasive shrubs such as the Butterfly bush. Maintenance of the restoration site includes weeding, specifically focusing on removing the new growth of Himalayan blackberries and Butterfly bush, and removing other weeds on the site that are on the Washington State and/or King County Noxious Weed List, namely, Tansy ragwort, Bull thistle and Oxeye daisy. Other invasive weeds will be removed as needed. Phase 2 also calls for the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field areas, and the removal of other noxious weeds present,which include Japanese knotweed. During Phase 1, community stewardship has been developed through the involvement of the different volunteer organizations in the restoration tasks and in the presentation of the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to four different groups. As stated in the KCD Strategic Initiative Section d, i): "Population Growth and Increased Urbanization. The District will actively promote workable solutions that help minimize the effects of population growth and increased urbanization on the natural environment." Description of how this project meets these criteria: When the planted native trees get larger,they will create a dense wooded area, a small forest, in a highly urbanized setting. The planting of trees in urban areas is very beneficial to the environment. Trees absorb contaminants, control erosion, reduce storm- water run-off by absorbing water through their roots, clean the air, and as stated above, are beneficial to the fish and wildlife by providing more shade, additional food sources and habitat. The trees,with the falling of large wooded debris, also enhance our stream systems. The grassy, field area that was part of the restoration site in Phase 1 was under laid with gravel to accommodate the trucks when the Black River Pump Station was built. One of the restoration tasks, during Phase 1, included ripping up the gravelly field and planting native trees, shrubs and forbs. Mulch was also added throughout the field area. The addition of mulch, and the decomposition of native vegetation in the future, will enrich the soil and help rebuild it. KCD Regional Funding Principles As stated in the#3 KCD Regional Funding Principles, iv), "Water quality and watershed restoration and protection support services such as coordination of monitoring(data collection, studies, evaluation)and public education programs". Description of how this project meets this criterion: During Phase 2, community involvement will expand to include the Renton schools and other local schools. Presently,there are two Renton schools, Lindbergh High School and Black River High School,which have provided written commitments to involve their students in hands-on learning at the Black River, as well as introducing a Black River component into their science curriculum. The Black River Riparian Forest,Channel and restoration areas will be used as a living laboratory for students to learn about scientific methods and concepts and to learn about the Black River and its components. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The Black River Restoration Project will also be included as an option in a tour sponsored by the King County Waste Treatment program, Wheels to Water. A visit to the South Treatment Plant will include a tour of the Black River and the opportunity to participate in restoration tasks or learn about the history and components of the Black River through a walking tour of the Forest, Channel and restoration sites. In addition to the above,the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation shown to different groups during Phase 1, helped educate the public about the restoration work and the Black River. The PowerPoint presentations will also be shown to new groups participating in Phase 2. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Phase 1: 1. Removal of invasive weeds: Himalayan blackberries were rampant on the riverbank and on a small vegetation island in the middle of the field. There were a few other invasives such as the Butterfly bush, but the Himalayan blackberry was the predominant invasive weed with a 50- 60% ground cover on the riverbank and a 35%ground cover on the island. Most of the invasive blackberries on the restoration site have been eradicated through the cutting and grubbing of the blackberries. Earthcorps was hired to cut and grub the blackberries on the top 20 ft. of the bank. Volunteers and salaried crew have removed the remainder of the blackberries on the island, and have been tackling the new growth of the Himalayan blackberry that is popping up throughout the site. A salaried person has also been cutting blackberries on the lower part of the bank, beyond the 20 ft., and throughout the site. 2. Removal of ecology blocks: There were 11 ecology blocks on the site before the project began. These have all been removed with the help of King County roads crew. 3. Ripping up of the gravelly field: Before the restoration work, the entire field area was grown over with grass and under laid with gravel that was deposited when the Black River Pump Station was built. It was almost impossible to dig into the field to plant native vegetation since the ground was so compacted. Half of the gravelly field was ripped up with the use of a backhoe,to allow for planting, and now the soil is looser. Thrushes were observed, on at least two different occasions, pecking at the soil since it has been loosened. The backhoe also removed the other invasive shrubs that were in the island. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger: In the other half of the gravelly field, 20 rows of planting holes were dug with an auger. The field area is being used as a test site to see which side produces better results, the augured field area or the area where the backhoe ripped up the gravel and grass. 5. Soil amendments: Approximately 60 cubic yards of mulch was spread throughout the field area of the restoration site beginning January 2005 through May 2005. The mulch helps with weed control; helps keep some moisture close to the newly planted native vegetation, and will enhance the soil as it decays. The soil in the field area is nutrient poor, and some plants are in need of fertilizer. Biosolids are in the process of being purchased from the South Waste Treatment Plant to place around the plants that need some fertilizing. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs: Most of the native plants were planted in January 2005. Some were planted in February 2005, and approximately 10 more were donated and planted in May 2005. There has been less than a 2% mortality rate, and those were mostly the Pacific madrones, which have the reputation of being difficult to plant. 7. Installation of the drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system was installed in April 2005. A drip system is crucial at this site, especially in the field area, since the soil is very well-drained and does not retain water. A few of the native plants had yellowed a little with the early heat spell in February/March, but once the drip irrigation system was running,the plants regained their healthy, green look. The drip irrigation system is attached to the faucet at the Pump Station HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 5 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application and is turned on at least 4 times a week by the Pump Station crew, and occasionally on hot and dry weekends, by the restoration project coordinator. 8. Community involvement: The community has shown interest and support, evidenced with the large numbers of participants. For two of the community activity days, there were over 50 volunteers helping on each of those days. 9. Monitoring and maintenance: The project is being monitored and maintained at least twice a month. Partners to the grant, Herons Forever and Friends of Black River members, are helping with the maintenance and monitoring. Monitoring includes tracking the condition of the native vegetation, the growth of the invasive weeds, checking the drip irrigation system and noting any wildlife in the area. Maintenance includes protecting the native vegetation from being eaten, if necessary; removing the invasive weeds by either weed whacking, or manually cutting then grubbing, as in the case of the blackberries; replacing dead native vegetation and repairing, if necessary,the drip irrigation system. Monitoring and maintenance is very important in helping the native plants thrive as well as ensuring that they will not be out competed by the invasive weeds or eaten by wildlife. The project activities and measurable results for Phase 2 include: 1. Planning and organizing: A Scope of Work Budget for King County needs to be completed before December 2005. Dates for the different restoration tasks need to be set, vendors need to be contacted, materials need to be purchased, subcontractors need to be lined up, requests for payments and other paperwork need to be submitted to King County throughout the project. Other grant paperwork needs to be completed including a report to KCD. Reports are submitted to partners on a regular basis. Media will be solicited for the various community events. Planning and organizing is critical for the project to run smoothly and to get the needed tasks done. 2. Contacting different volunteer organizations: Different volunteer organizations will be contacted to help with the native planting, mulching and installation of the drip irrigation system. Involving the community will develop community stewardship of the Black River. We will attempt to involve the same organizations as last year,to strengthen community stewardship, and contact new groups as well. The new groups will be shown the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to acquaint them with the Black River and to build some desire and enthusiasm to help with the restoration tasks. 3. Contacting Lindbergh and Black River High Schools to set up dates for student participation in the restoration project and discuss the specifics of the addition of the Black River into the science curriculum. 4. Developing a tour schedule with the Wheels to Water Program and writing up an oral presentation for the tour. 5. Removing invasive weeds: The invasive weeds account for at least 90%of the present groundcover, and most of the weeds are Himalayan blackberry. The weeds need to be removed in order to plant native vegetation. The roots of the weeds will be removed to inhibit the return growth of the weeds. The abundant Himalayan blackberries create a monoculture with a food source that has limited value since it is not eaten by much of the wildlife. 6. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs: Approximately 500 trees, shrubs and forbs will be planted with numerous species of each.Native vegetation will enhance the area by providing food sources, shade and habitat for the wildlife; and a diversity of native vegetation will provide a variety of food and habitat sources.Native trees will also control erosion, storm-water run-off, clean the air and absorb contaminants in the soil. 7. Soil amendments: Mulch will be added around the areas where the native vegetation is planted. Mulch will help retain the moisture in the soil, control weeds as well as enrich the soil as it decays. A natural fertilizer, such as biosolids, will be added as necessary. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 6 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 8. Installing a drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system will keep the native vegetation hydrated and increase their chance of survival. Watering is critical especially during the area's dry summer months. 9. Maintenance and monitoring of the restoration site: Monitoring includes checking and recording the condition of the native plants,the drip irrigation system, the growth of the invasive weeds and wildlife activity. Maintenance involves repairing the drip irrigation system, removing the growing weeds, replacing dead native plants and protecting the native plants from being eaten by wildlife. Frequent maintenance and monitoring will help keep the invasive growth from getting out of control and help insure the successful growth of the native vegetation as well as catch any other problems that come up. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Other Total King County Funds Waterworks (specify) Grant Salaries and Benefits $1,034 $14,000 $15,034 Travel/Meals/Mileage $253 $2,043 $2,296 Office/Field Supplies $3,489 $12,728 $16,217 Contracted/Professional $15,138 $15,138 Services Land Acquisition Permits $93 97 190 Other(Fiscal Agents) $4,684 $4,684 TOTAL 1 $4,869 1 $48,690 $53,559 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. The KCD contribution will be noted on the signs that will be placed at the two restoration sites upon the termination of the project. King County has been advised that KCD funds will potentially be the source of the cash match for the project for both phases. Any newspaper articles or photos will acknowledge KCD as a contributor to the project. KCD will be acknowledged as a contributor and partner in the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation. KCD will also be mentioned and acknowledged in other correspondence related to the project. L ; regg Zi er n, P. . Date PBPW Ad nistrator HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 935 Powell Avenue SW.Renton,WA 98055•Phone(206)764-3410•Fax(206)764-6677.E-mail district®kingcd.org February 27, 2006 Allen Quynn FEB 2 8 20C' City of Renton CITY OF RENT t,. 1055 S Grady Way UTI!_ITY SYSl .:;tr,;: Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Quynn, Enclosed, for your records,is a signed Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grant for the Cih1 of Renton SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project. This grant is funded with King Conservation District Special Assessment funds allocated for projects prioritized by the City of Renton. Additional enclosures include a check in the amount of$55,084.85, forms for use when submitting biannual reports on project expenses related to the grant, and forms for use when requesting a revision to your grant agreement. I'd like to call attention to a number of paragraphs in the Agreement. Detailed in paragraph 2.5 are guidelines on submitting biannual financial and progress reports on the grant. Detailed in paragraphs 2.6 through 2.7 are instructions on accounting for the expenditure of the grant funds. Detailed in paragraph 2.13 are guidelines on acknowledging the District as a source of funding for the project. I am available to answer any questions you may have about these details. Marla Hamilton Lucas, District Financial Manager, is also available to answer questions concerning accounting and financial reporting. Please do not hesitate to contact us at any time. Sincerely, Brandy Reed District Co-Coordinator Enclosures (4) KCD Ref: KCD Ref 06-031 Allen Quynn, City of Renton AprilDRAFT- 2006 d Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Application Packet The King Conservation District noncompetitive grant program supports natural resource improvement projects in partnerships with 34 King County jurisdictions that are members of the District and the WRIA 7,8 and 9 watershed forums. The King Conservation District awards noncompetitive grants for projects that are consistent with the mandates of the District as established by Chapter 89.08 RCW. The purpose of this document is to convey the grant application process,and describe the eligibility criteria and grant policies and procedures for noncompetitive grants. OVERVIEW The King Conservation District noncompetitive grant program awards grants for natural resource improvement projects within the boundary of the District. See Eligible Natural Resource Improvement Actions on page 2 for details about eligible activities and Grant Budget Policies on page 4 for eligible expenses. Applicants seeking noncompetitive grants shall submit a grant application using the form titled Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Application. This form can be obtained from the King Conservation District or by visiting the District web page at www.kingcd.org/pro_gra.htm. See Grant Application Submittal Procedures detailed on page 6 for instructions on submitting a grant application. Grant applications will be accepted and approved by the King Conservation District Board of Supervisors at regularly scheduled Board meetings between the months of February and October during calendar years 2006 through 2007. Grant applicants will be notified of an award or denial by email or letter within.A. week of as rcvularly 4€'lat=c:laaled board in efi.ng,<at which dwir grant a plication -,%aas coz i;i erc d. Wifliin flia°ee �,%cf,ks of award of a noncompetitive grant,the District will draft a grant agreement and forward it to the grantee for review and signature. t%"itia ai five, weeks of receiving an aawa.e.r ient sig,ra d l ra wru_ratee, the District�- i(1 remit tfie (tall) executed agrcernent and c fiec1,�to the grantee as detailed in General Grant Program Policies on page 3. The amount of time required to complete this entire process varies,but generally takes a minimum of 3 months and a maximum of 7 months. Grant recipients shall submit biannual progress and financial reports,as well as a final narrative and financial report upon completion of the grant project. All documents submitted will be posted on the District web site. See Grant Administration,Accounting&Reporting on page 5 for details on reporting requirements. ELIGIBLE NATURAL RESOURCE IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS Grant proposals shall address a minimum of one of the natural resource improvement actions detailed in this section. These actions have been established consistent with RCW 89.08 and the King Conservation District Strategic Plan,and are intended to direct District natural resource K[taj (`c)aIS r :;1t? C€>C t1[1CC?Illt?tF1 IS'E I..7taaI11 SS l,t aCk C 0 MtIrCIS,2006 age I of 8 118 Al Fill- -2-1,111101, 2006 management activities to improve natural resource conditions within the boundary of the District. Chapter 89.08 RCW outlines the duties of conservation districts in Washington State. Among these,conservation districts are charged with promoting the implementation of Best Management Practices that conserve soils,protect and enhance water quality,and protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat through education and technical assistance programs,and by leveraging local,state and federal sources of funding. The King Conservation District Strategic Plan identifies the District's priority natural resource conservation initiatives,priority geographic areas,and 2-year and 4-year natural resource management goals and objectives. The current District strategic plan focuses on protecting water quality and quantity;promoting economically viable agriculture;protecting and enhancing wildlife habitat and open-spaces;and encouraging behavior changes in King County residents and organizations. Applicants shall present their proposed project using the appropriate form to summarize a proposed project,outline project outcomes, and identify how the project will achieve performance of at least one of the 4 natural resource improvement actions listed below. Applicants are asked to evaluate their proposals based upon the degree to which their project efficiently,effectively and equitably implements these natural resource improvement actions. Efficiency will be demonstrated by a direct and cost-effective approach,effectiveness will be the degree to which the proposed project produces or achieves the intended results,and equity will be fairness in the geographic and demographic distribution of effects and/or benefits of the proposed project. The District Board of Supervisors shall determine the degree grant applications are consistent with these eligibility criteria. Natural Resource Improvement Actions Education and Outreach-to raise awareness,deepen knowledge,and change behaviors Desired Outcomes-residents,landowners, other land managers,and organizations within the boundary of the District have the knowledge,skills and attitudes needed to practice exemplary stewardship of natural resources. Capacity Building-to enhance the ability of organizations,agencies,residents, landowners and other land managers to implement best management practices and deliver natural resource management actions on the ground Desired Outcomes-organizations,agencies,residents,landowners and other land managers within the boundary of the District have knowledge,skills,tools,support systems and technical resources to employ exemplary natural resource stewardship practices Pilot and Demonstration Projects-to test and/or improve concepts and/or approaches in natural resource management that can be replicated by others Desired Outcomes-demonstrate exemplary practices that,when replicated,contribute to natural resource conservation and from which others can learn;demonstrate novel approaches to natural resources improvement and share this information and extend it to others. Direct Improvement of Natural Resource Conditions-to improve landscape and natural resource conditions as a result of direct action hiiig Cortsc ro':s- �)ktrict Nmiconipet€tive Cirarit,AppIi;a E o Packet • M arch,2006 lla ge 2 of 8 Desired Outcomes-implement conservation practices to protect and enhance water quality; protect and conserve soils;implement ecosystem restoration and preservation projects;and purchase conservation easements and environmentally significant properties. POLICIES General Grant Program Policies 1) Project activities proposed for funding shall be implemented entirely within the boundary of the King Conservation District. 2) Projects shall demonstrate direct on-the-ground improvements to natural resources or result in a product that will lead to direct on-the-ground improvements to natural resources within 3 years of completing the awarded grant project. �a�\�•� 3) Eligible Applicants shall include the 34 jurisdictions located in King County that are members of the King Conservation District or their designee;and the designees of the WRIA 7,8 and 9 Watershed Forums. Member jurisdictions include unincorporated King County and all incorporated areas of King County,excluding Enumclaw,Federal Way,Pacific,Milton,and Skykomish. Designees of Watershed Forums and member jurisdictions can include 501 (c)3 non-profit organizations. / 4) The District shall remit grant awards as follows:90% of the grant award shall be �5 remitted at the time a fully signed agreement is forwarded to a grant recipient;10% of the grant award shall be held until the grant project is completed,all required documentation has been submitted to the District,and the District has issued grant close-out documentation. 5) Grantees shall conduct maintenance on installed projects and i Cltide inai t(.r: ri; nce report. in tl're.ir biannijal hr0k'TeSs wi?o its and final wport. Maintenance activities on planting projects shall be conducted a minimum of 5 years following project implementation regardless of the apl�ro ed project conipletion date,and sha elude weeding and watering installed plants and replacement planting to achieve 90° survival-Maintenance on installed roads,bridges,and in-stream structures-shall_ -include annual inspectio s for the life of the installed structure.-- M .G — . �^ 6) Grant recipients shall acknowledge the King Conservation-lstrict as a source of funding for awarded grant activities on all printed,web based,and electronic documents;audio-visual materials;signs;or any other materials produced in association with an awarded grant. ,/7) Applicants are encouraged to involve community members from their respective communities in the prioritization and selection of proposed projects. 8) Acquisition of real property is permitted for purchase of properties or easements that will protect critical habitat for fish and wildlife and protect or improve water quality, provided the applicant can demonstrate a capacity to maintain the property toward natural resource protection. To the extent possible the properties or easements purchased using the special assessment funds shall have signs indicating that King Conservation District Funds were used in the purchase of property. hire Corts�r�zetit: 3 :s� !r4,.tear�ccnrpet`rtiv�tar�trtl '�(�(?li�_< . , ,a vt • March,'l{)t)t� tr=.e 3 of 8 r DRAFT Grant Application Policies LX 9) Applications submitted by member jurisdiction shall first be reviewed and approved by the legislative authority of those jurisdictions. Applications submitted by Watershed Forums shall first be reviewed and approved by the relevant Watershed Forum. /10) The District shall provide member jurisdictions and Watershed Forums with an estimate of the grant funds available by March 31st of each year. /11) Member jurisdictions,their designees,and the designees of Watershed Forums shall ✓ apply for noncompetitive grants using the application forms titled King Conservation District Member Jurisdiction Noncompetitive Grant Application and King Conservation District Watershed Forum Noncompetitive Grant Application respectively. ✓ 12) Applications must be received a minimum of three weeks prior to a board meeting scheduled to take place during the months of February through October. Applications received outside this schedule will be reviewed at the next available District board meeting during the months of February through October. 13) Member jurisdiction and Watershed Forum designees may be federal,state or local agencies;other municipal corporations,non-profit organizations, Native American Tribes,and private sector companies that provide services within the boundary of the District. Watershed Forums are required to designate an outside agency or party to apply for a noncompetitive grant with the District. 14) When a primary applicant is a non-profit organization or private sector company, individual applications are limited to a maximum of$50,000,and total awards in a calendar year are limited to a maximum of$150,000. ✓15) Recommendation of a proposed project by a member jurisdiction or Watershed Forum shall be submitted in the form of a letter from the relevant entity. /16) The King Conservation District Board of Supervisors shall determine whether proposed projects are consistent with the policies and funding criteria of this noncompetitive grant program. Grant Budget Policies 17) Eligible expenditures include direct project costs. Indirect project costs that do not exceed 25% of salaries and benefits are also allowed. 18) Ineligible expenses include management of existing recreation facilities,Watershed Forum Inter Local Agreement fees,and activities that ensure compliance with existing regulations,such as floodplain management regulations and storm-water management regulations. 19) Doc aa men tation of matching;fonds is oncoiii agk�J f,m al grant a pp]ications. Matc1) funds Shull im lude donated services,s, labor,, e=:lctipn:a€tat and supplies that an., prw,iced to the project trom the date it nriutt is uratd the project completion d,lte identihed in tlao,application. 20) Volunteer participation on grant projects shall be valued at a rate consistent with the Washington State minimum wage for individuals under 18 years of age,a rate of$18 King Conservation \(mcoiiipetitive Grtarit M irch,2€06 0 � 4 of 8 per hour for individuals over 18 years of age,and a rate consistent with an applicable profession for specialists and professionals. 21) Contracted services over'.`),..._.....__...shal l require 3 bids to establish reasonable costs for services to be provided. Applicants shall provide documentation of a bid solicitation process with a submitted application.When 3 bids cannot be obtained,an applicant should submit an explanation for the reduced number of bids. Grant Administration,Accounting,&Reporting Policies 22) Expenditures associated with an awarded grant shall be segregated in the accounting records of the grant recipient. Accounting records shall identify expenditures assigned to a job title or job code consistent with the awarded grant,shall identify income and expenses by line items consistent with the awarded grant budget,and shall be consistent with the Washington State BARS Code System. Accounting records along with a project file must be maintained by the grant recipient for a minimum of three years after the calendar year in which the grant agreement with the District is closed. 23) Progress reports and expense reports shall be submitted 2 times per year,the first due Ma 3oi'A June 30th and the second due November 30th. Progress reports will detail the grantee's progress on completing approved grant tasks using the form titled Member f rtrisdic:ticon &VJR.IA.Fort m 1'i.ricont pch'ti )e(want Progress I;c-q.?art. Expense reports will detail project expenses using the form titled Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Expense Report. Progress and expense reports shall be submitted in hard copy and electronic formats and will be posted on the District's web page for public access. 24) Upon completion of the project, grant recipients will submit a final project report and final financial report to document compliance with the awarded project proposal; provide before and after photos when applicable;and identify project successes, project difficulties,and lessons learned. Final narrative and expense reports shall be submitted 30 days after completing a grant project using the form titled i lc:rnber t ft;°isdictionz &1 Ri Fol ir3r" trtJ?c;titir.�e Chant' Vinai Report and the form titled Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Expense Report respectively. Final reports shall be submitted in hard copy and electronic formats and will be posted on the District's web page for public access. 25) The District shall conduct implementation audits of awarded grants at its discretion. Grant recipients shall facilitate the audit process,including but not limited to review of financial records and inspection of on-the-ground activities associated with an awarded grant. 26) A grant will be closed once the District has closed a grant and released all remaining awarded grant funds. Grant Revision Policies 27) Requests to revise an awarded scope of work,budget,and project timeline may be submitted for approval by the Board of Supervisors using the revision request forms titled Member Jurisdiction&WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Amendment Request, Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Scope of Work Revision Detail, and Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Budget Revision Detail. .. � <<ft5ervat�ior� t:)istri4t Narrcb,rr r�; �„rrt: t�plic<3tior� Packet • �. err;tr;2006 • fa-e 5 of 8 DRAFT-April , 0 t/28) Revision requests must be received a minimum of three weeks prior to the District board meeting at which they will be reviewed. Revision requests received outside this schedule will be reviewed at a regularly scheduled board meeting in a following month. 29) Scope of work,budget,and project timeline revision requests shall be accompanied by a letter from the applicable member jurisdiction or watershed forum recommending the proposed revision(e.g.,a scope of work revision request for a grant funded in partnership with the Snoqualmie Watershed Forum requires documented concurrence by that entity). SELECTION AND AWARD PROCESS District staff and the District Board of Supervisors will review noncompetitive grant applications prior to an award determination. District staff will review applications to determine if all requested information has been provided. Applications determined to be incomplete will be returned to applicants with an explanation. Applications determined to be complete will be forwarded for review by the Board of Supervisors noncompetitive grant subcommittee. The subcommittee will evaluate proposed projects for their need and feasibility of implementation. District staff will contact applicants when the subcommittee requires additional information to complete its review. The subcommittee will forward applications to the Board of Supervisors for consideration at regularly scheduled board meeting(see Grant Application Policies on pa,,,,, 4). Board review of grant applications will lead to one of three outcomes: an awarded grant,a denied application,or a request for additional information. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES Applicants will submit 6 hard copies of the grant application, one with an original signature, and one electronic copy to the District. Applications must be forwarded to the District by and an applicable municipality or Watershed Forum documenting that entity's recommendation of the project for funding by the District. Applications should be sent to the following address: King Conservation District Noncompetitive Grant Program 935 Powell Ave SW,Ste.D Renton,WA 98055 Electronic copies of applications should be submitted to noncompetitivegrants@kingcd.org Bing Conservhi�ion Grani Application • March,2006 1�e`,'6 of 8 ORA111- ,2006 Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Application King Conservation District Project Title: Applicant: Contact: Principal Partners (if any): Title: Total Project Cost: Address: KCD Funding Requested: Phone: Project Start Date: Fax: Project End Date: E-mail: 1. Project Description-provide a brief description of the project that summarizes what you will do,how you will do it, and why you will do it. Consider the following in the answer to this question:what pressing need will be addressed by the project or what promising opportunity will be capitalized on?Who or what will benefit or be positively and negatively affected? 2. Natural Resource Improvement Actions-describe how the project will address a minimum of one of the natural resource improvement actions described on page 1 of the application instructions. Consider the following in your answer to this question:What natural resources will be improved?What are the known needs,gaps or deficits that will be addressed? What are the known benefits to soil,water,air,plants,fish and wildlife, landowners? 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results-list specific project activities to be completed, the timetable for the activities,and the deliverables associated with those activities. Consider the following in your answer to this question: What actions, interventions,programs, services will be deployed? 4. Effectiveness(see page 2 of application instructions for definition)-describe how the project will effectively implement the natural resource improvement measures identified in question No.2 above. Consider the following in your answer to this question: Why is the primary applicant the best entity to deliver the proposed program/service/intervention?What is the capacity of the primary applicant to deliver the proposed program/service/intervention?What tools, services and partners will be brought to bear? Kim (ors ,r% akm DkIric,t for€corn€petitiv C,rmt Packet • %la ch, .; , « Pmzyc 7 of 8 DRAFT-April 00 , .t. 5. Efficiency(see page 2 of application instructions for definition)-describe how the project will efficiently implement the natural resource improvement measures identified in question No. 2 above. Consider the following in your answer to this question: How will the proposed program/service/intervention engage in conjunction with related efforts?How does your strategy best leverage resources? 6. Equity(see page 2 of application instructions for definition) -describe how the project will equitably implement the natural resource improvement measures identified in question No. 2 above. Consider the following in your answer to this question:In what part of the District will the proposed program/service/intervention occur?What geographic area will be affected?Who is the target audience and what demographic section of the community will be affected? 7. Evaluation of Intended Results-describe the evaluation mechanisms you will use to track, document,and report that the project has achieved the intended results described in questions 1-3. 8. Project Budget&Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Other Funds Total 3ecify (4_ecifv) Salaries and Benefits Travel/Meals/Mileage Office/Field Supplies Contracted/Professional Services Land Acquisition Permits Other(specify) Other(specify) Other(specify) TOTAL 9. KCD Acknowledgement-describe how the KCD will be acknowledged as a source of funding for the proposed program/service/intervention (see page 3 of application instructions for requirements). Authorized Signature Date K in-Consemition Distric.i Non Grant Application Nickel Maivl7, 2006 « I'L� 8 of 8 4 Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum I,, 14 Noncompetitive Grant Rating Form King Conservation District Grant Title: Grant Applicant: Date Reviewed: PERFORMANCE MEASURE POINTS SCORE Pr6ect Description & Activities (minimum threshold points) a. what pressing need will be addressed by the project or what promising opportunity will be capitalized on? _points possible a. b. Who or what will benefit or be positively and negatively affected? _points possible b. c. What actions, interventions, programs, services will be deployed? _points possible C. Subtotal Natural Resource Improvement Action (minimum threshold points) a. What natural resources will be improved? _points possible a. b. What are the known needs, gaps or deficits that will be addressed? _points possible C. c What are the known benefits to soil, water, air, plants, fish and wildlife, landowners? _points possible d. Subtotal Effectiveness: the degree to which the proposed protect produces or achieves the intended results (minimum threshold points) a. Why is the primary applicant the best entity to deliver the proposed program/service/intervention? _points possible a. b. What is the capacity of the primary applicant to deliver the proposed program/services/intervention? _points possible b. c. What tools, services and partners will be brought to bear? _points possible C. Subtotal Efficiency: the direct and cost-effective approach (minimum threshold points) a. How will the proposed program/service/intervention engage in conjunction with related efforts? _points possible a. b. How does your strategy best leverage resources? _points possible b. Subtotal Equity: the fairness in distribution of effects and/or benefits of the proposed project (minimum threshold points) a. In what part of the District will the proposed program/service/intervention occur? _points possible a. b. What geographic area will be affected? _points possible b. C. Who is the target audience and what demographic section of the community will be affected? _points possible C. S u btota I Evaluation (minimum threshold points) a. What mechanisms will be used to track, document, and report that the program/service/intervention achieved the intended results? _points possible a. Subtotal Total Points/Rating Directions To the King Conservation District From Seattle South on 1-5 to Martin Luther King Jr. Way exit (south end of Boeing Field). Take Right on 681h Ave S (second traffic light). Take left onto 7th Ave (first traffic light). Turn right onto Powell Ave SW (1st intersection). Our office is in the Washington Technical Center business park. Take the second driveway on the right and go around the left side of the building to the southwest corner of the building. Our building is labeled 935. The front door is on the corner of the building, with a sign posted on the front lawn. From Tacoma North on 1-5 to 1-405. North on 1-405 to exit 1 . Take exit 1 . Turn left at end of off-ramp (onto Interurban Ave/West Valley Hwy.). Get into right lane. Turn right onto Grady Way (first traffic light). Turn left onto Powell (second traffic light). Turn left into the fourth driveway and follow the remainder of the directions detailed above. From Bellevue South on 1-405 to exit 2. Take exit 2 and merge onto Rainier Ave (north bound). Get into left lane and turn left onto Grady Way (first traffic light). Turn right onto Powell Ave SW. Turn left into the fourth driveway and follow the remainder of directions detailed above. Our Office Our office is located in Renton, off of Grady Way, on Powell Ave 7th Ave SW, in the Washington Q 0 o Technical Center KCD Office business park > ■ CD D Gradv Wa 935 Powell Ave SW, Ste D 1405 Renton, WA 98055 (425) 277-5581 ext. 105 Q Fax: (425) 277-5588 J= a www.kingcd.org 1 TY OF RE T Oir Planning/BuildingftblicWorks Department COPY Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator �t it nog July 25, 2005 t �� MS Ms. Brandy Reed Noncompetitive Grants Program Manager King Conservation District 935 Powell Avenue SW, Suite D Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT GRANT APPLICATIONS Dear Ms.Reed: Enclosed please find our 2005 King Conservation District Noncompetitive Grant Applications. These two applications are to cover the King Conservation District Special Assessment fund allocated to the City for 2002-2005,per King County Ordinance#12959. The first application is for the City sponsored SW 341h Street Culvert Replacement Project. The second application is for the Black River Channel Restoration Project, sponsored by Doris Yepez. The City requests the District allocate a portion of Renton's assessment fund for the Black River Channel Restoration Project. We also request any shortfall or surplus of funds,as a result of uncertainties in the 2004 and 2005 estimated allocation,be applied to the SW 34'h Street Culvert Replacement Project. Please submit our grant applications to the King Conservation District Board of Supervisors for review and approval. If you have any questions or concerns regarding these applications, please call Allen Quynn, Project Manager, Surface Water Utility at 425-430-7247. Sincerely, 01 Gregg Zim an, E. PBPW Administrator Enclosures cc: Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director Ron Straka,Surface Water Utility Supervisor Allen Quynn,Surface Water Utility Engineer H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA'l 1-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation r ct\2002-2005 OS Sout Gra y Way-Renton,Was in gton 98055 E N T O N ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE VY 5 fvr7T Project Name: SW 341h Street Culvert Contact: Allen Quynn Replacement Project Applicant: City of Renton Title: Project Manager Principal Partners (if any): Address: 1055 S. Grady Way City of Renton Renton,WA 98055 Total Project Cost: $900,000 estimated Phone: 425-430-7247 KCD Funding Requested: $55,084.85 Fax: 425-430-7247 Project Start Date: April 2005 E-mail: a u nn ci.renton.wa.us Project End Date: Fall 2007 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): The purpose of this project is to replace the existing Springbrook Creek culvert crossing of SW 341h Street in Renton, Washington. The crossing consists of 4 existing, undersized corrugated metal (CMP)culverts that will be replaced with a new box culvert. Springbrook Creek is the main drainage channel for the 24-square mile Black River Basin that includes portions of the Cities of Renton, Kent,Tukwila and unincorporated King County. Springbrook Creek drains to the Black River Pump Station where flows are pumped into the Green River(see attached figures 6-1 and 6-2). The fisheries resources within Springbrook Creek include Chinook and Coho salmon, steelhead and cutthroat trout. The existing culverts were constructed in 1980 and are a major restriction of flows that contribute to the flooding problems in portions of the south valley during storm events. The project consists of the following elements: • Construction of a new box culvert including stream bypass. • Placement of spawning gravel in the bottom of the culvert. • Placement of woody debris on the sides of the channel. • Planting of riparian trees and shrubs along channel bank. 2. Project Objectives(Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts, provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): The project will accomplish the following objectives: • Eliminate flooding of the SW 341h Street/Springbrook Creek crossing during the 100-yr storm event. • Lower upstream water levels,which will increase the capacity of local storm systems in Lind Avenue and SW 34`h Street. • Upsizing the SW 341h Street culvert in conjunction with future pipe system improvements will help the City meet flood protection goals in the valley. • Provide improved fish passage and riparian habitat for salmonid migration. The following provides a brief description of how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.01: "To prepare and keep current a comprehensive long-range program recommending the conservation of all the renewable natural resources of the District. Such King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application programs shall be directed toward the best use of renewable natural resources and in a manner that will best meet the needs of the District and the state,taking into consideration, where appropriate, such uses as farming, grazing,timber supply, forest, parks, outdoor recreation, potable water supplies for urban and rural areas, water for agriculture, minimal flow, and industrial uses, watershed stabilization, control of soil erosion, retardation of water run-off, flood prevention and control, reservoirs and other water storage, restriction of developments of flood plains, protection of open space and scenery, preservation of natural beauty, protection of fish and wildlife, preservation of wilderness areas and wild rivers, the prevention or reduction of sedimentation and other pollution in rivers and other waters, and such location of highways, schools, housing developments, industries, airports and other facilities and structures as will fit the needs of the state and be consistent with the best uses of the renewable natural resources of the state. The program shall include an inventory of all renewable natural resources in the District, a compilation of current resource needs, projections of future resource requirements, priorities for various resource activities, projected timetables,descriptions of available alternatives, and provisions for coordination with other resource programs. Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project meets the above criteria by reducing flooding of SW 34`h Street as well as upstream storm systems that discharge to Springbrook Creek. The new culvert will be designed to prevent flooding of the SW 34`h Street crossing during the 100-yr storm event and lower tail water conditions for outfalls discharging upstream. The project will also help protect fish by lowering stream velocities during storm events through the new culvert to facilitate fish passage. KCD Strategic Plan Initiate: This proposal meets the strategic plan element 2,d(iii)Support for Regional Conservation Initiatives, which states: "The District will join in regional conservation initiatives,lending its leadership and expertise on issues such as major river flooding,preserving and restoring fish habitat, protecting and restoring water quality in watersheds and general public conservation education programs in the region". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is one element of a series of projects recommended in the City of Renton's 1997 East Side Green River Watershed Plan and EIS (ESGRWP), which was a basin wide planning level study to identify projects that would help reduce the flooding in the Renton valley area. The ESGRWP identified the replacement of the SW 341h Street crossing of Springbrook Creek to reduce upstream water levels and improve fish passage. As discussed under the previous criteria,the proposed project will eliminate flooding of SW 30 Street during the 100-yr storm as well as reduce flooding in local storm systems upstream that discharge to the creek. The project will also improve water quality and provide wildlife habitat with the addition of riparian plantings such as native shrubs and trees along the channel bank. In-stream woody debris will also be added to provide fish rearing and refuge habitat. Springbrook Creek is within Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA)9. The draft WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan identifies the need for improving fish passage riparian habitat and water quality to benefit Chinook salmon and other salmonids. HA\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doMQtp King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Regional Funding Principles Established by the King County Regional Task Force: The project satisfies regional task force funding principles criteria 3,1(ii), which states: "Habitat restoration which enhances ecological significant fish runs". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is located on Springbrook Creek, which historically has poor water quality, particularly low dissolved oxygen due to high water temperatures. The basin, especially the valley floor has become highly urbanized with large commercial and industrial areas that directly discharge to Springbrook Creek. This project will address water quality by planting plants and trees along the channel bank that will help provide shade and help cool the creek during the summer months. Woody debris will also be incorporated into the project to provide channel rearing and refuge habitat for salmon. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Project activities include the following: • Replace existing undersized culverts with a new box culvert to increase conveyance capacity and reduce flooding of SW 34th Street and upstream storm pipe systems. • Construct stream bypass during provide dewatering of groundwater during construction. • Relocate utilities. • Provide a more natural and better-lined streambed to enhance fish passage. This includes adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert. • Provide riparian habitat planting including a mix of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Measurable Results include: • After project construction, observe lower water surface elevations in the channel upstream of SW 34th Street during high flow events. • A year after construction complete, observe the establishment of native riparian plants in areas planted as part of project restoration. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Total City of Renton Salaries and Benefits Travel/Meals/Mileage Office/Field Su lies Contracted/Professional $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 Services Land Acquisition Permits Other TOTAL $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Funding will be acknowledged, reported and tracked using the State of Washington Accounting and Reporting System or"BARS". The use of taxpayer funds provided through the King Conservation District for the above-described projects will be acknowledged through newspaper articles, websites or other information released during project implementation. Attachments Gregg Zi rman Date PBPW Ad 'str or HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1 I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp -- East Side G-'en River Black River King County Water Quality g y ; , I Watershed Bundary Management Plan .� •••'" • � ••ems. •. ,��.� `� -s-•. Study Area •vim• / , OWN � f � , L. � � ,• eel � �,• tr � •�{� .� . �. .�. .•'� L � -� . • '•'•� j ire Panther Lake I .' 405 i LKing Count Garrison I .• ' �rj -1 Creek I i Renton I Renton ' r; 1 .1 King County �• r- �. Springbrook•7r. C.—.—.—.f �.—._.—.J .�--� rj Valley Area co - m ® 167 Kent Springbrook Creek East Valle Road i Springbrook — Creek j Renton 167 Tukwila _ Creed ' , �.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—•'-� ♦ — woo •s•- ' — K cn j Black River 00� een ent 181 181 tau-- / Pump Station � rukw��a I � - ----• - � N Kent Tukwila Kent Lagoons 1 1_5 ` Riker EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER �. WATERSHED PROJECT o `._•_._.1 0 3000 6000 FIGURE 6-1 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET PROJECT AREA ,- - - -_ - cn ::::. = ' ''(ZR\S ------ :: : _ - -- f RENTON f � . ; _ HOPPING S c �. . RD �: AV* CENTER -, MORRIS AV S TglooT S WHIT- `: `:. ''. �„ �,� z - ROLL..ING HILLS CREEK RO 0 --- — ... .. . cLo f; -. ..... ._ - f- - .. .. - z . SHATT + :_.- = = SHATTU - S VV :: y\ GENERAL , TALBOT ~ TL VALLEY N P AN H CREE _ _ _ ...._ ......... HOSPITAL L V —' 167 60 - i 36"x48" BOX SR-167 36" :. - - _ p .. --— „k' 36* _ o: E VALLEY RD - --; :: - VALLEY 6 f- ..:RD ,. , . _ _ Q C .' Oi f- ''' 4p 4 cn o ! Y `\ A i i �i i : 2 f-- a Cn , , - a a : a. i v : : x� LI a, y : y°` s' ND _ - .---------- ------ - -- - � , : ; - 60* - I `i AV S }`1 5 y AV Q - .• .: - >--_--.._-._. v,;; ! Street Culvert f%L --. : 34` LW lacement Pro ec N SENECA �: . N`. v>=: fn�_ � � t I 1 Lj 21' 3 ..-----._..._.-------------- SCALE -------------= 1" - -- _ � ` � THOMAS AV •`- � _ �- , , a ; s s� I: e U a ! N ' . € : , , a ;4 i t' w' ---:- POWELL AV SW r`�, r' 1 CONNECTING b` I CHANNEL PROJECT -�x -- ; -- : 18' S, YTS; _. - -- - 60` , COMPLETED :. _..-- —..--.._..._.. _ _....:........ _..... -- :_.- - - -- ....- G /' ._. .i _. In f OAKESDALE AV SW :t -.::.: „j LEGEND f ,\ VALLEY AREA 36" ,> ` • I S ' r. (STUDY AREA) 36 DIAMETER STORM DRAIN ` { , m +r co STREAM/DRAINAGE CHANNEL ' z CULVERT(S)Of �' =f JACKSON SW I I Y :f i _ PUMP STATION �• �-=� �- -==��- 77 MILL - J FLOOD WATER — �—_.-�. /'•'i'�. � --------- --..._._. __ .. .__...__. .._._:....- ---'� � -^�•.--�t-.�� �_L 1 RR�_.\_.y\...� __._. a STORAGE POND -- , ' _ -- TUKWILA CREEK 1/ RENTON CITY LIMITS R -- —- WATERSHED PROJECT - -- BLACK` \� ,,� r - ----- --_ .......__. _..__ _- 8 i _ _ -- - -- \ \ _ .���r i"�%' _ ......--- - --`.`5 WEST LEY - RIVER - HWY a- - o , PUMP -_._ •.._- .' f= �� RENTON AREA ._. _....... STATION ; EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM 'ki TO GREEN-DUWAMISH i`\°�� \��� RIVER N ' King Conservation District 1 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Project Name: Black River Channel Native Contact: Doris Yepez Plant Restoration Project Applicant: Doris-Yepez 6)(Oc /Lw�r;�✓• SIv.�G�� �Title: Project Coordinator Phase 1 Fiscal Agent: Se Wad,-- 4',,,, her Phase 2 Fiscal Agent: Duwamish Tribe Principal Partners (if any): Address: 16444 SE 1351h St. City of Renton Renton,WA 98059 Friends of Black River Herons Forever Duwamish Tribe Total Project Cost: $53,559.00 Phone: 425 891-0730 KCD Funding Requested: $4,869.00 Fax: 425 917-0872 Project Start Date: 9/29/2004 E-mail: dorisdandelion@yahoo.com Project End Date: Spring200)f 7 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): There are two phases to the Black River Channel Restoration Project, Phase I and Phase 2, and the funding requested covers both Phases. The goals for both Phases are to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, and develop community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. Phase I began September 29, 2004, and concludes in Spring 2007 with a commitment to maintain and monitor the restoration site for two years. The restoration area for Phase I is .83 of an acre in size and located on the south bank of the Black River Channel, off of Monster Road SW,adjacent and immediately downstream from the DNRP Black River Pump Station and upstream from the Monster Road Bridge. Much of the work has been completed to date and included: I. The removal of invasive plants on the top 20 ft. of the riverbank and in the adjoining field. 2. The removal of 11 ecology blocks left on the property. 3. Scarification of the soil to loosen the gravelly soil on half of the field area. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger. 5. Soil amendments. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs. 7. Installation of a drip irrigation system to increase the survival rate of the newly planted native vegetation. What remains is the monitoring and maintenance of the restoration site for the two year committed period. Phase 2 will begin in Fall 2005 and will conclude Spring 2008. Phase 2 is on the south bank as well, but immediately upstream from,and adjacent to,the DNRP Black River Pump Station. The restoration area is approximately ''/2 acre in size. As in Phase 1,the goal is to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, as well as expand community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. The new site will also be monitored and maintained for two years. 2. Project Objectives(Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts,provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The project objectives are: • Provide shade, food sources and habitat improvements for the fish and wildlife through the removal of invasive weeds and the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs. • Acquaint the community and students with the Black River. • Educate the community and students about the Black River Channel Restoration Project and the Black River watershed, forest and channel ecosystem. • Involve the community and students in the restoration work. The following provides a brief description of specifically how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.450: "Watershed restoration projects--Intent. The legislature declares that it is the goal of the state of Washington to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular,fish and wildlife and their habitat. It is further the policy of the state insofar as possible to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals." Description of how this project meets the first part of the criteria"to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular,fish and wildlife and their habitat": This project restores the riparian habitat along the Black River Channel and adjoining field, and improves the fish and wildlife habitat. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs restores the area to its more natural state. In addition,the native trees planted along the riverbank will provide shade that will keep the temperatures of the water at a more desirable level for salmonids. The debris from the trees and shrubs, leaves falling,will also provide a source of food for the fish; and fallen trees will act as LWD, (Large Woody Debris),which give salmon areas to rest and spawn. The field area,with the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs, will provide a buffer from the noise and pollution of the street,as well as provide a diversity of food sources for the other wildlife,producing berries and flowers at different times of year. Also, once grown in,the vegetation will provide more habitat areas for the wildlife. Description of how this project meets the second part of the criteria"to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals": During Phase 1,there were four community events: one day for planting,two others for mulching and weeding, and the last was the installation of the drip irrigation system.Numerous groups helped with these tasks including Renton Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, Campfire Girls,Herons Forever members,Friends of Black River, Duwamish tribal members, Sierra Club members,Boeing volunteers and the Briarwood Student Leadership Group. The same volunteer organizations will be asked to help with Phase 2 in order to increase the groups' sense of connection and commitment to the Black River and to give them the opportunity to see the growth and progress made through their participation in the restoration tasks during Phase 1. KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria As stated in the KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria, Section b ii): "Promoting Natural Habitat Restoration.The District will provide information and assistance to landowners, businesses,and other HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application citizens in rural and urban areas on the preservation and restoration of natural habitats including the creation of low-maintenance native plant habitats that conserve water and are friendly to wildlife, eco- landscaping, establishing naturescaping demonstration sites, intrusive species management and community stewardship". Description of how this project meets this criteria: The restoration work included, in Phase 1,the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field area,as well as the removal of other invasive shrubs such as the Butterfly bush. Maintenance of the restoration site includes weeding, specifically focusing on removing the new growth of Himalayan blackberries and Butterfly bush, and removing other weeds on the site that are on the Washington State and/or King County Noxious Weed List,namely,Tansy ragwort, Bull thistle and Oxeye daisy. Other invasive weeds will be removed as needed. Phase 2 also calls for the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field areas,and the removal of other noxious weeds present,which include Japanese knotweed. During Phase 1, community stewardship has been developed through the involvement of the different volunteer organizations in the restoration tasks and in the presentation of the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to four different groups. As stated in the KCD Strategic Initiative Section d, i): "Population Growth and Increased Urbanization. The District will actively promote workable solutions that help minimize the effects of population growth and increased urbanization on the natural environment." Description of how this project meets these criteria: When the planted native trees get larger,they will create a dense wooded area, a small forest, in a highly urbanized setting. The planting of trees in urban areas is very beneficial to the environment. Trees absorb contaminants, control erosion,reduce storm- water run-off by absorbing water through their roots,clean the air, and as stated above, are beneficial to the fish and wildlife by providing more shade, additional food sources and habitat. The trees,with the falling of large wooded debris, also enhance our stream systems. The grassy, field area that was part of the restoration site in Phase I was under laid with gravel to accommodate the trucks when the Black River Pump Station was built. One of the restoration tasks, during Phase 1, included ripping up the gravelly field and planting native trees, shrubs and forbs.Mulch was also added throughout the field area.The addition of mulch, and the decomposition of native vegetation in the future,will enrich the soil and help rebuild it. KCD Regional FundingPrinciples rinciples As stated in the# 3 KCD Regional Funding Principles, iv),"Water quality and watershed restoration and protection support services such as coordination of monitoring(data collection, studies,evaluation)and public education programs". Description of how this project meets this criterion: During Phase 2, community involvement will expand to include the Renton schools and other local schools. Presently,there are two Renton schools,Lindbergh High School and Black River High School,which have provided written commitments to involve their students in hands-on learning at the Black River, as well as introducing a Black River component into their science curriculum. The Black River Riparian Forest,Channel and restoration areas will be used as a living laboratory for students to learn about scientific methods and concepts and to learn about the Black River and its components. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The Black River Restoration Project will also be included as an option in a tour sponsored by the King County Waste Treatment program, Wheels to Water. A visit to the South Treatment Plant will include a tour of the Black River and the opportunity to participate in restoration tasks or learn about the history and components of the Black River through a walking tour of the Forest, Channel and restoration sites. In addition to the above,the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation shown to different groups during Phase 1, helped educate the public about the restoration work and the Black River. The PowerPoint presentations will also be shown to new groups participating in Phase 2. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Phase 1: 1. Removal of invasive weeds: Himalayan blackberries were rampant on the riverbank and on a small vegetation island in the middle of the field. There were a few other invasives such as the Butterfly bush,but the Himalayan blackberry was the predominant invasive weed with a 50- 60% ground cover on the riverbank and a 35%ground cover on the island. Most of the invasive blackberries on the restoration site have been eradicated through the cutting and grubbing of the blackberries. Earthcorps was hired to cut and grub the blackberries on the top 20 ft. of the bank. Volunteers and salaried crew have removed the remainder of the blackberries on the island, and have been tackling the new growth of the Himalayan blackberry that is popping up throughout the site. A salaried person has also been cutting blackberries on the lower part of the bank, beyond the 20 ft., and throughout the site. 2. Removal of ecology blocks: There were 11 ecology blocks on the site before the project began. These have all been removed with the help of King County roads crew. 3. Ripping up of the gravelly field: Before the restoration work,the entire field area was grown over with grass and under laid with gravel that was deposited when the Black River Pump Station was built. It was almost impossible to dig into the field to plant native vegetation since the ground was so compacted. Half of the gravelly field was ripped up with the use of a backhoe,to allow for planting, and now the soil is looser. Thrushes were observed, on at least two different occasions, pecking at the soil since it has been loosened. The backhoe also removed the other invasive shrubs that were in the island. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger: In the other half of the gravelly field,20 rows of planting holes were dug with an auger.The field area is being used as a test site to see which side produces better results,the augured field area or the area where the backhoe ripped up the gravel and grass. 5. Soil amendments: Approximately 60 cubic yards of mulch was spread throughout the field area of the restoration site beginning January 2005 through May 2005. The mulch helps with weed control;helps keep some moisture close to the newly planted native vegetation,and will enhance the soil as it decays. The soil in the field area is nutrient poor, and some plants are in need of fertilizer. Biosolids are in the process of being purchased from the South Waste Treatment Plant to place around the plants that need some fertilizing. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs: Most of the native plants were planted in January 2005. Some were planted in February 2005, and approximately 10 more were donated and planted in May 2005. There has been less than a 2%mortality rate,and those were mostly the Pacific madrones, which have the reputation of being difficult to plant. 7. Installation of the drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system was installed in April 2005. A drip system is crucial at this site,especially in the field area, since the soil is very well-drained and does not retain water. A few of the native plants had yellowed a little with the early heat spell in February/March,but once the drip irrigation system was running,the plants regained their healthy, green look.The drip irrigation system is attached to the faucet at the Pump Station HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\I003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 5 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application and is turned on at least 4 times a week by the Pump Station crew, and occasionally on hot and dry weekends, by the restoration project coordinator. 8. Community involvement: The community has shown interest and support, evidenced with the large numbers of participants. For two of the community activity days, there were over 50 volunteers helping on each of those days. 9. Monitoring and maintenance: The project is being monitored and maintained at least twice a month. Partners to the grant,Herons Forever and Friends of Black River members, are helping with the maintenance and monitoring. Monitoring includes tracking the condition of the native vegetation,the growth of the invasive weeds,checking the drip irrigation system and noting any wildlife in the area. Maintenance includes protecting the native vegetation from being eaten, if necessary; removing the invasive weeds by either weed whacking, or manually cutting then grubbing, as in the case of the blackberries; replacing dead native vegetation and repairing, if necessary,the drip irrigation system. Monitoring and maintenance is very important in helping the native plants thrive as well as ensuring that they will not be out competed by the invasive weeds or eaten by wildlife. The project activities and measurable results for Phase 2 include: 1. Planning and organizing: A Scope of Work Budget for King County needs to be completed before December 2005. Dates for the different restoration tasks need-to be set,vendors need to be contacted, materials need to be purchased, subcontractors need to be lined up, requests for payments and other paperwork need to be submitted to King County throughout the project. Other grant paperwork needs to be completed including a report to KCD. Reports are submitted to partners on a regular basis. Media will be solicited for the various community events. Planning and organizing is critical for the project to run smoothly and to get the needed tasks done. 2. Contacting different volunteer organizations: Different volunteer organizations will be contacted to help with the native planting,mulching and installation of the drip irrigation system. Involving the community will develop community stewardship of the Black River. We will attempt to involve the same organizations as last year,to strengthen community stewardship, and contact new groups as well. The new groups will be shown the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to acquaint them with the Black River and to build some desire and enthusiasm to help with the restoration tasks. 3. Contacting Lindbergh and Black River High Schools to set up dates for student participation in the restoration project and discuss the specifics of the addition of the Black River into the science curriculum. 4. Developing a tour schedule with the Wheels to Water Program and writing up an oral presentation for the tour. 5. Removing invasive weeds: The invasive weeds account for at least 90%of the present groundcover, and most of the weeds are Himalayan blackberry. The weeds need to be removed in order to plant native vegetation.The roots of the weeds will be removed to inhibit the return growth of the weeds.The abundant Himalayan blackberries create a monoculture with a food source that has limited value since it is not eaten by much of the wildlife. 6. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs: Approximately 500 trees, shrubs and forbs will be planted with numerous species of each.Native vegetation will enhance the area by providing food sources, shade and habitat for the wildlife; and a diversity of native vegetation will provide a variety of food and habitat sources.Native trees will also control erosion,storm-water run-off, clean the air and absorb contaminants in the soil. 7. Soil amendments: Mulch will be added around the areas where the native vegetation is planted. Mulch will help retain the moisture in the soil, control weeds as well as enrich the soil as it decays. A natural fertilizer, such as biosolids,will be added as necessary. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\]003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc I I King Conservation District 6 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 8. Installing a drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system will keep the native vegetation hydrated and increase their chance of survival. Watering is critical especially during the area's dry summer months. 9. Maintenance and monitoring of the restoration site: Monitoring includes checking and recording the condition of the native plants,the drip irrigation system,the growth of the invasive weeds and wildlife activity. Maintenance involves repairing the drip irrigation system, removing the growing weeds, replacing dead native plants and protecting the native plants from being eaten by wildlife. Frequent maintenance and monitoring will help keep the invasive growth from getting out of control and help insure the successful growth of the native vegetation as well as catch any other problems that come up. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Other Total King County Funds Waterworks (specify) Grant Salaries and Benefits $1,034 $15,034 Travel/Meals/Mileage $253 $2,043 $2,296 Office/Field Supplies $3,489 $12,728 $16,217 Contracted/Professional $15,13 8 $15,13 8 Services �1) Land Acquisition Permits $93 97 190 Other(Fiscal Agents) $4,684 $4,684 TOTAL $4,869 $48,690 $53,559 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. The KCD contribution will be noted on the signs that will be placed at the two restoration sites upon the termination of the project. King County has been advised that KCD funds will potentially be the source of the cash match for the project for both phases. Any newspaper articles or photos will acknowledge KCD as a contributor to the project. KCD will be acknowledged as a contributor and partner in the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation. KCD will also be mentioned and acknowledged in other correspondence related to the project. regg Zinff r n, P. Date PBPW Ad strator HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1 I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc �ti`SY O� PLANNINGBUILDING/ + _ ♦ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IN M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 5, 2005 s COf4CURRENCE_o, TO: Terri Briere, Council President DATE If ,2- —C-5 Members of the City Council NAME INITIALS ?ATE I vS" VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor i -z-aT FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator ��� l' S STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor Allen Quynn, Surface Water Engineer SUBJECT: 2002-2005 King Conservation District Agreement for Noncompetitive Grants ISSUE: Should the Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to (1) execute an agreement with the King Conservation District(KCD)to accept the City of Renton annual share of the approved King Conservation District assessment, and(2) approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance? RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department staff recommends that Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King County Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservation District fund allocation from 2002 to 2005. In addition, staff also requests that the Council approve using a portion ($4,869) of Renton's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The City of Renton became a member of the King Conservation District in March 1992, upon the passage of Resolution No. 2885. At that time, the King County Council approved a$1.25 per parcel assessment against all properties within jurisdictions that are members of the King Conservation District on August 16, 1993. Subsequently, K.C. Ordinance 12959, approved by the King County Council in December 1997, adopted the Regional Water Quality Committee's recommendation to raise the Conservation District annual assessment from $1.25 per parcel to $5 per parcel. The $1.25 per parcel assessment had been in place since the King County Council adopted Ordinance 10981 in Terri Briere December 5,2005 Page 2 of 2 August 1993 and was renewed in 1995 by Ordinance 12095. The Ordinances provide that the generated revenues be distributed as follows: • $3 distributed equally to each of the five watershed forums • $1 per parcel to the County and each city in the District from which the funds were collected • $1 per parcel to the District for implementation of its approved work program. The District will either spend the funds in cities by providing services, or will transfer the funding to the cities to be used as financial assistance for stream restoration, fish habitat, and/or water quality projects. Based on the assessment collected in 2004 by the King Conservation District, the annual share available to Renton is approximately $16,393 per year. The grant funds could be used to pay the District for specific additional services or could be transferred to the City for use on eligible projects. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of a total KCD assessment from 2002 through 2005 estimated at$65,936. The amount of the agreement does not match the total estimated assessment due to the fact that the agreement amount is based on the approved grant application submitted in July of this year. The amount requested in the application was based on the estimated 2005 assessment at the time the application was prepared. Since that time, the estimated 2005 assessment has been revised by KCD to include an additional $6,000.15. Although the balance of$6,000.15 cannot be used under the 2005 agreement, it will be available for the City to use for future projects covered under a separate grant application and subsequent agreement. The KCD assessment will be used to fund the City sponsored SW 341' Street Drainage Improvement Project ($55,084.85) and the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored the Black River Watershed Alliance ($4,869). Both of these projects will help to restore fish habitat as well as improve water quality in the Springbrook Creek Basin. Attached is a brief description of projects that are being requested for funding by the district for this year. Also attached is a copy of an agreement to allow the transfer of funds from the King Conservation District to the City along with a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. CONCLUSION: Council approves a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with the King Conservation District to accept the City of Renton share of the approved King Conservation District assessment and approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\Issue Paper.docAQlp CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR AWARD OF A NON- COMPETITIVE GRANT. WHEREAS, King Conservation District No. 9 has funds available to it to assist the City of Renton in providing certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has applied for and received a grant to perform such activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions relating to the award of the grant to the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION Il. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement for award of non-competitive grant to the City of Renton from King Conservation District No. 9. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of December, 2005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk H:AFile Sys\SWA- Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation DistrictWesolution.doc RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of December, 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 2 Project Name: SW 34`h Street Culvert Contact: Allen Quynn Re lacement Project Applicant: Ci_ - of Renton Title: Project Manager Principal Partners (if any): Address: 1055 S. Grady Way City of Renton Renton, WA 98055 Total Project Cost: $900,000 estimated Phone: 425-430-7247 KCD Fundin Re nested: $55,084.85 Fax: 425-430-7247 Project Start Date: April 2005 E-mail: a u nn ci.renton.wa.us Project End Date: Fall 2007 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): The purpose of this project is to replace the existing Springbrook Creek culvert crossing of SW 341h Street in Renton, Washington. The crossing consists of 4 existing, undersized corrugated metal (CMP) culverts that will be replaced with a new box culvert. Springbrook Creek is the main drainage channel for the 24-square mile Black River Basin that includes portions of the Cities of Renton, Kent, Tukwila and unincorporated King County. Springbrook Creek drains to the Black River Pump Station where flows are pumped into the Green River(see attached figures 6-1 and 6-2). The fisheries resources within Springbrook Creek include Chinook and Coho salmon, steelhead and cutthroat trout. The existing culverts were constructed in 1980 and are a major restriction of flows that contribute to the flooding problems in portions of the south valley during storm events. The project consists of the following elements: • Construction of a new box culvert including stream bypass. • Placement of spawning gravel in the bottom of the culvert. • Placement of woody debris on the sides of the channel. • Planting of riparian trees and shrubs along channel bank. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts,provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): The project will accomplish the following objectives: • Eliminate flooding of the SW 34'h Street/Springbrook Creek crossing during the I00-yr storm event. • Lower upstream water levels,which will increase the capacity of local storm systems in Lind Avenue and SW 34`h Street. • Upsizing the SW 34`h Street culvert in conjunction with future pipe system improvements will help the City meet flood protection goals in the valley. • Provide improved fish passage and riparian habitat for salmonid migration. The following provides a brief description of how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.01: "To prepare and keep current a comprehensive long-range program recommending the conservation of all the renewable natural resources of the District. Such King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application programs shall be directed toward the best use of renewable natural resources and in a manner that will best meet the needs of the District and the state, taking into consideration, where appropriate, such uses as farming, grazing, timber supply, forest, parks, outdoor recreation, potable water supplies for urban and rural areas, water for agriculture, minimal flow, and industrial uses, watershed stabilization, control of soil erosion, retardation of water run-off, flood prevention and control, reservoirs and other water storage, restriction of developments of flood plains, protection of open space and scenery, preservation of natural beauty, protection of fish and wildlife, preservation of wilderness areas and wild rivers, the prevention or reduction of sedimentation and other pollution in rivers and other waters, and such location of highways, schools, housing developments, industries, airports and other facilities and structures as will fit the needs of the state and be consistent with the best uses of the renewable natural resources of the state. The program shall include an inventory of all renewable natural resources in the District, a compilation of current resource needs, projections of future resource requirements, priorities for various resource activities, projected timetables, descriptions of available alternatives, and provisions for coordination with other resource programs. Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project meets the above criteria by reducing flooding of SW 34`h Street as well as upstream storm systems that discharge to Springbrook Creek. The new culvert will be designed to prevent flooding of the SW 34`h Street crossing during the 100-yr storm event and lower tail water conditions for outfalls discharging upstream. The project will also help protect fish by lowering stream velocities during storm events through the new culvert to facilitate fish passage. KCD Strategic Plan Initiate.- This proposal meets the strategic plan element 2,d(111)Support for Regional Conservation Initiatives, which states: "The District will join in regional conservation initiatives, lending its leadership and expertise on issues such as major river flooding,preserving and restoring fish habitat,protecting and restoring water quality in watersheds and general public conservation education programs in the region". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is one element of a series of projects recommended in the City of Renton's 1997 East Side Green River Watershed Plan and EIS (ESGRWP),which was a basin wide planning level study to identify projects that would help reduce the flooding in the Renton valley area. The ESGRWP identified the replacement of the SW 34`h Street crossing of Springbrook Creek to reduce upstream water levels and improve fish passage. As discussed under the previous criteria,the proposed project will eliminate flooding of SW 34`h Street during the 100-yr storm as well as reduce flooding in local storm systems upstream that discharge to the creek. The project will also improve water quality and provide wildlife habitat with the addition of riparian plantings such as native shrubs and trees along the channel bank. In-stream woody debris will also be added to provide fish rearing and refuge habitat. Springbrook Creek is within Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA)9. The draft WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan identifies the need for improving fish passage riparian habitat and water quality to benefit Chinook salmon and other salmonids. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doclAQtp King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncoinpetitive Grant Application Regional Funding Principles Established by the King County Regional Task Force The project satisfies regional task force funding principles criteria 3,1(11), which states: "Habitat restoration which enhances ecological significant fish runs". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is located on Springbrook Creek, which historically has poor water quality, particularly low dissolved oxygen due to high water temperatures. The basin, especially the valley floor has become highly urbanized with large commercial and industrial areas that directly discharge to Springbrook Creek. This project will address water quality by planting plants and trees along the channel bank that will help provide shade and help cool the creek during the summer months. Woody debris will also be incorporated into the project to provide channel rearing and refuge habitat for salmon. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Project activities include the following: • Replace existing undersized culverts with a new box culvert to increase conveyance capacity and reduce flooding of SW 340' Street and upstream storm pipe systems. • Construct stream bypass during provide dewatering of groundwater during construction. • Relocate utilities. • Provide a more natural and better-lined streambed to enhance fish passage. This includes adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert. • Provide riparian habitat planting including a mix of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Measurable Results include: • After project construction, observe lower water surface elevations in the channel upstream of SW 34`I' Street during high flow events. • A year after construction complete, observe the establishment of native riparian plants in areas planted as part of project restoration. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Total (fit ;of Renton Salaries and Benefits Travel/Meals/Mileage Office/Field Supplies Contracted/Professional $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 Services Land Acquisition Permits Other TOTAL $55,084.85 $844,915.15 J $900,000 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City CorrespondencelCity KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Funding will be acknowledged, reported and tracked using the State of Washington Accounting and Reporting System or"BARS". The use of taxpayer funds provided through the King Conservation District for the above-described projects will be acknowledged through newspaper articles, websites or other information released during project implementation. Attachments _�/It, zz. Gregg Zi rman Date PBPW Ad str or HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1]-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 1 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Project Name: Black River Channel Native Contact: Doris Yepez Plant Restoration Project Applicant: Doris Yepez Title: Project Coordinator Phase 1 Fiscal Agent: Seattle Audubon Society Phase 2 Fiscal Agent: Duwamish Tribe Principal Partners (if any): Address: 16444 SE 135"'St. City of Renton Renton,WA 98059 Friends of Black River Herons Forever Duwamish Tribe Total Project Cost: $53,559.00 Phone: 425 891-0730 KCD Funding Requested: $4,869.00 Fax: 425 917-0872 Project Start Date: 9/29/2004 E-mail: dorisdandelion ahoo.com Project End Date: Spring 2008 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): There are two phases to the Black River Channel Restoration Project,Phase I and Phase 2,and the funding requested covers both Phases. The goals for both Phases are to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, and develop community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. Phase 1 began September 29, 2004,and concludes in Spring 2007 with a commitment to maintain and monitor the restoration site for two years. The restoration area for Phase 1 is .83 of an acre in size and located on the south bank of the Black River Channel, off of Monster Road SW, adjacent and immediately downstream from the DNRP Black River Pump Station and upstream from the Monster Road Bridge_ Much of the work has been completed to date and included: 1. The removal of invasive plants on the top 20 ft. of the riverbank and in the adjoining field. 2. The removal of 11 ecology blocks left on the property. 3. Scarification of the soil to loosen the gravelly soil on half of the field area. 4_ Digging planting holes with an auger. 5. Soil amendments. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs. 7. Installation of a drip irrigation system to increase the survival rate of the newly planted native vegetation. What remains is the monitoring and maintenance of the restoration site for the two year committed period. Phase 2 will begin in Fall 2005 and will conclude Spring 2008. Phase 2 is on the south bank as well, but immediately upstream from, and adjacent to,the DNRP Black River Pump Station. The restoration area is approximately''/z acre in size. As in Phase 1,the goal is to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, as well as expand community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. The new site will also be monitored and maintained for two years. 2. Project Objectives(Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts,provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\]003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The project objectives are: • Provide shade, food sources and habitat improvements for the fish and wildlife through the removal of invasive weeds and the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs. • Acquaint the community and students with the Black River. • Educate the community and students about the Black River Channel Restoration Project and the Black River watershed, forest and channel ecosystem. • Involve the community and students in the restoration work. The following provides a brief description of specifically how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.450: "Watershed restoration projects--Intent. The legislature.declares that it is the goal of the state of Washington to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular, fish and wildlife and their habitat. It is further the policy of the state insofar as possible to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals." Description of how this project meets the first part of the criteria"to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular, fish and wildlife and their habitat": This project restores the riparian habitat along the Black River Channel and adjoining field, and improves the fish and wildlife habitat. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs restores the area to its more natural state. In addition,the native trees planted along the riverbank will provide shade that will keep the temperatures of the water at a more desirable level for salmonids. The debris from the trees and shrubs, leaves falling, will also provide a source of food for the fish; and fallen trees will act as LWD, (Large Woody Debris), which give salmon areas to rest and spawn. The field area, with the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs, will provide a buffer from the noise and pollution of the street, as well as provide a diversity of food sources for the other wildlife, producing berries and flowers at different times of year. Also, once grown in,the vegetation will provide more habitat areas for the wildlife. Description of how this project meets the second part of the criteria"to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals": During Phase 1, there were four community events: one day for planting,two others for mulching and weeding, and the last was the installation of the drip irrigation system. Numerous groups helped with these tasks including Renton Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, Campfire Girls, Herons Forever members,Friends of Black River, Duwamish tribal members, Sierra Club members, Boeing volunteers and the Briarwood Student Leadership Group. The same volunteer organizations will be asked to help with Phase 2 in order to increase the groups' sense of connection and commitment to the Black River and to give them the opportunity to see the growth and progress made through their participation in the restoration tasks during Phase 1. KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria As stated in the KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria, Section b ii): "Promoting Natural Habitat Restoration. The District will provide information and assistance to landowners, businesses, and other HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1 I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application citizens in rural and urban areas on the preservation and restoration of natural habitats including the creation of low-maintenance native plant habitats that conserve water and are friendly to wildlife, eco- landscaping, establishing naturescaping demonstration sites, intrusive species management and community stewardship". Description of how this project meets this criteria: The restoration work included, in Phase 1, the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field area, as well as the removal of other invasive shrubs such as the Butterfly bush. Maintenance of the restoration site includes weeding, specifically focusing on removing the new growth of Himalayan blackberries and Butterfly bush, and removing other weeds on the site that are on the Washington State and/or King County Noxious Weed List, namely, Tansy ragwort, Bull thistle and Oxeye daisy. Other invasive weeds will be removed as needed. Phase 2 also calls for the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field areas, and the removal of other noxious weeds present, which include Japanese knotweed. During Phase 1, community stewardship has been developed through the involvement of the different volunteer organizations in the restoration tasks and in the presentation of the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to four different groups. As stated in the KCD Strategic Initiative Section d, i): "Population Growth and Increased Urbanization. The District will actively promote workable solutions that help minimize the effects of population growth and increased urbanization on the natural environment." Description of how this project meets these criteria: When the planted native trees get larger, they will create a dense wooded area, a small forest, in a highly urbanized setting. The planting of trees in urban areas is very beneficial to the environment. Trees absorb contaminants, control erosion,reduce storm- water run-off by absorbing water through their roots, clean the air, and as stated above,are beneficial to the fish and wildlife by providing more shade, additional food sources and habitat. The trees, with the falling of large wooded debris, also enhance our stream systems. The grassy, field area that was part of the restoration site in Phase 1 was under laid with gravel to accommodate the trucks when the Black River Pump Station was built. One of the restoration tasks, during Phase 1, included ripping up the gravelly field and planting native trees, shrubs and forbs. Mulch was also added throughout the field area. The addition of mulch, and the decomposition of native vegetation in the future,will enrich the soil and help rebuild it. KCD Regional FundingPrinciples rinciples As stated in the # 3 KCD Regional Funding Principles, iv), "Water quality and watershed restoration and protection support services such as coordination of monitoring(data collection, studies,evaluation) and public education programs". Description of how this project meets this criterion: During Phase 2, community involvement will expand to include the Renton schools and other local schools. Presently,there are two Renton schools, Lindbergh High School and Black River High School,which have provided written commitments to involve their students in hands-on learning at the Black River, as well as introducing a Black River component into their science curriculum. The Black River Riparian Forest, Channel and restoration areas will be used as a living laboratory for students to learn about scientific methods and concepts and to learn about the Black River and its components. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD GrantsA 003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The Black River Restoration Project will also be included as an option in a tour sponsored by the King County Waste Treatment program, Wheels to Water. A visit to the South Treatment Plant will include a tour of the Black River and the opportunity to participate in restoration tasks or learn about the history and components of the Black River through a walking tour of the Forest, Channel and restoration sites. In addition to the above, the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation shown to different groups during Phase 1, helped educate the public about the restoration work and the Black River. The PowerPoint presentations will also be shown to new groups participating in Phase 2. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Phase 1: I. Removal of invasive weeds: Himalayan blackberries were rampant on the riverbank and on a small vegetation island in the middle of the field. There were a few other invasives such as the Butterfly bush, but the Himalayan blackberry was the predominant invasive weed with a 50- 60%ground cover on the riverbank and a 35% ground cover on the island. Most of the invasive blackberries on the restoration site have been eradicated through the cutting and grubbing of the blackberries. Earthcorps was hired to cut and grub the blackberries on the top 20 ft. of the bank. Volunteers and salaried crew have removed the remainder of the blackberries on the island,and have been tackling the new growth of the Himalayan blackberry that is popping up throughout the site_ A salaried person has also been cutting blackberries on the lower part of the bank, beyond the 20 ft., and throughout the site. 2. Removal of ecology blocks: There were I I ecology blocks on the site before the project began. These have all been removed with the help of King County roads crew. 3. Ripping up of the gravelly field: Before the restoration work, the entire field area was grown over with grass and under laid with gravel that was deposited when the Black River Pump Station was built. It was almost impossible to dig into the field to plant native vegetation since the ground was so compacted. Half of the gravelly field was ripped up with the use of a backhoe,to allow for planting, and now the soil is looser. Thrushes were observed, on at least two different occasions, pecking at the soil since it has been loosened. The backhoe also removed the other invasive shrubs that were in the island. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger: In the other half of the gravelly field,20 rows of planting holes were dug with an auger. The field area is being used as a test site to see which side produces better results,the augured field area or the area where the backhoe ripped up the gravel and grass. 5. Soil amendments: Approximately 60 cubic yards of mulch was spread throughout the field area of the restoration site beginning January 2005 through May 2005. The mulch helps with weed control; helps keep some moisture close to the newly planted native vegetation,and will enhance the soil as it decays. The soil in the field area is nutrient poor, and some plants are in need of fertilizer. Biosolids are in the process of being purchased from the South Waste Treatment Plant to place around the plants that need some fertilizing. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs: Most of the native plants were planted in January 2005. Some were planted in February 2005, and approximately 10 more were donated and planted in May 2005. There has been less than a 2% mortality rate, and those were mostly the Pacific madrones, which have the reputation of being difficult to plant. 7. Installation of the drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system was installed in April 2005. A drip system is crucial at this site,especially in the field area, since the soil is very well-drained and does not retain water. A few of the native plants had yellowed a little with the early heat spell in February/March, but once the drip irrigation system was running, the plants regained their healthy, green look. The drip irrigation system is attached to the faucet at the Pump Station HAFile Sys\,SWA-Surface Water Section Administration4SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants11003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 5 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application and is turned on at least 4 times a week by the Pump Station crew, and occasionally on hot and dry weekends, by the restoration project coordinator. 8. Community involvement: The community has shown interest and support, evidenced with the large numbers of participants. For two of the community activity days, there were over 50 volunteers helping on each of those days. 9. Monitoring and maintenance: The project is being monitored and maintained at least twice a month. Partners to the grant, Herons Forever and Friends of Black River members,are helping with the maintenance and monitoring. Monitoring includes tracking the condition of the native vegetation, the growth of the invasive weeds,checking the drip irrigation system and noting any wildlife in the area. Maintenance includes protecting the native vegetation from being eaten, if necessary; removing the invasive weeds by either weed whacking, or manually cutting then grubbing, as in the case of the blackberries; replacing dead native vegetation and repairing, if necessary, the drip irrigation system. Monitoring and maintenance is very important in helping the native plants thrive as well as ensuring that they will not be out competed by the invasive weeds or eaten by wildlife. The project activities and measurable results for Phase 2 include: 1. Planning and organizing: A Scope of Work Budget for King County needs to be completed before December 2005. Dates for the different restoration tasks need to be set, vendors need to be contacted, materials need to be purchased, subcontractors need to be lined up, requests for payments and other paperwork need to be submitted to King County throughout the project. Other grant paperwork needs to be completed including a report to KCD. Reports are submitted to partners on a regular basis. Media will be solicited for the various community events. Planning and organizing is critical for the project to run smoothly and to get the needed tasks done. 2. Contacting different volunteer organizations: Different volunteer organizations will be contacted to help with the native planting, mulching and installation of the drip irrigation system. Involving the community will develop community stewardship of the Black River. We will attempt to involve the same organizations as last year, to strengthen community stewardship, and contact new groups as well. The new groups will be shown the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to acquaint them with the Black River and to build some desire and enthusiasm to help with the restoration tasks. 3. Contacting Lindbergh and Black River High Schools to set up dates for student participation in the restoration project and discuss the specifics of the addition of the Black River into the science curriculum. 4. Developing a tour schedule with the Wheels to Water Program and writing up an oral presentation for the tour. 5. Removing invasive weeds: The invasive weeds account for at least 90%of the present groundcover, and most of the weeds are Himalayan blackberry. The weeds need to be removed in order to plant native vegetation. The roots of the weeds will be removed to inhibit the return growth of the weeds. The abundant Himalayan blackberries create a monoculture with a food source that has limited value since it is not eaten by much of the wildlife. 6. Planting native trees, shrubs and fortis: Approximately 500 trees, shrubs and forbs will be planted with numerous species of each. Native vegetation will enhance the area by providing food sources, shade and habitat for the wildlife; and a diversity of native vegetation will provide a variety of food and habitat sources. Native trees will also control erosion, storm-water run-off, clean the air and absorb contaminants in the soil. 7. Soil amendments: Mulch will be added around the areas where the native vegetation is planted. Mulch will help retain the moisture in the soil,control weeds as well as enrich the soil as it decays. A natural fertilizer, such as biosolids, will be added as necessary. HAFile Sys\.SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD GrantsU 003 City Correspondence0oris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 6 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 8. Installing a drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system will keep the native vegetation hydrated and increase their chance of survival. Watering is critical especially during the area's dry summer months. 9. Maintenance and monitoring of the restoration site: Monitoring includes checking and recording the condition of the native plants, the drip irrigation system, the growth of the invasive weeds and wildlife activity. Maintenance involves repairing the drip irrigation system, removing the growing weeds,replacing dead native plants and protecting the native plants from being eaten by wildlife. Frequent maintenance and monitoring will help keep the invasive growth from getting out of control and help insure the successful growth of the native vegetation as well as catch any other problems that come up. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Other Total King County Funds Watenvorks (specify) Grant Salaries and Benefits $1,034 $14,000 $15,034 Travel/Meals/Mileage $253 $2,043 $2,296 Office/Field Supplies $3,489 $12,728 $16,217 Contracted/Professional $l 5,138 $15,138 Services Land Acquisition Permits $93 97 190 Other(Fiscal Agents) $4,684 $4,684 TOTAL $4,869 $48,690 $53,559 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. The KCD contribution will be noted on the signs that will be placed at the two restoration sites upon the termination of the project. King County has been advised that KCD funds will potentially be the source of the cash match for the project for both phases. Any newspaper articles or photos will acknowledge KCD as a contributor to the project. KCD will be acknowledged as a contributor and partner in the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation. KCD will also be mentioned and acknowledged in other correspondence related to the project. regg Zit2trator n,P. Date PBPW Ad HAFife Sys\S WA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc J, RENTON Q3 SHOPPING % Gil • V S i AV RQ.IU�4 HILL 60 S CREEK at ................ -,-- SHATTUCK ............. .......... !2i TALBOT VALLEY PANTHER CREEK W"ANO Q. GENERAL HOSPI T F ................... AL nr NZ L-2�, ------- C> 36*x48*BOX 60• SR-167-- 36* . ............ i Syr --------------- E LEY RD V) L Y A ',V 4fr tj if -CIND j 1 LIND AV S AV ---------- 7,7 Lac Ell p 21' "A' j 11 A 34' Street Culv rt S P SENECA Ni [Rep cmentPr ow SCALE 1-=Iow THOMAS AV SW 0 -T CONNECTING PO LL AV SW :I:if OW44EL PROJECT 15%1 (COMPLETED -------- ------ ' 54 OAKESDALE AV SW -Ts LEGEND VALLEY AREA Z (STUDY AREA) 36" DIAMETER STORM DRAIN STREAM/DRAINAGE CHANNEL CULVERT(S) if SW STATION Pump S 11 MILL FLOOD WATER \77-17TT-17-;Zn�� CREEK 9 RR STORAGE POND 'I T KWILA R RENTON CITY LIMITS -7- EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER BLACk,�\,,\, WATERSHED PROJECT RIVER WEST y V FIGURE 6-2 PUMP T STATION RENTON VALLEY AREA EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO GREEN-DUWAMISH �` \ BEN�\1FR + RIVER Black River r,�_.�—East Side 4en River Water Quality King County Watershedaundary Management Plan j JL Study Area - 1. , �— �- Panther Loke 405 j \ rr LKing Count Garrison I j I Renton, Creek Renton ; j i L- I - •� Kin Count r _—Upper J g y rJ�.1 _..1 d rj �.�.� Springbroor•C'r Valley Area in 167 Kent ! Springbrook Creek Ja East Valle Road ���'�•, 3 Springbrook 1 N Creek. i Renton mill O j i kwilo u crPPk 167 '�� 1 Black River i� een Kent in Pump Station�i � Tukwila1 181 181 .—•---•_._._._._.,� 1 N Kent N Tukwila i 0 Kent Lagoons ., 1-5 EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER $ `•.-._._.J 0 3000 6000 WATERSHED PROJECT � 's APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET nGURE 6-1 � t PROJECT AREA E 1 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of- Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division/ Surface December 5, 2005 Water Utility Staff Contact...... Ron Straka (ext. 7248) Allen Quynn (ext. 7247) Agenda Status Consent.............. X Subject: Public Hearing.. 2002-2005 king Conservation District Agreement for Correspondence.. Noncompetitive Grants Ordinance............. Resolution............ Old Business........ Exhibits: New Business....... Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Resolution Information......... Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grants Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other............... X Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $0 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... $59,953.85 (requested fund allocation for 2002-2005) Total Project Budget... City Share Total Project... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The King Conservation District (KCD) agreement allows the transfer of the City of Renton's $1 per parcel share of the $5 per parcel KCD Assessment of parcels within Renton. The grant funding can be used on projects that are approved by KCD such as water quality, habitat enhancement, water and fisheries resource protection projects and programs. The current estimated balance of the grant funding available to the City from 2002 through 2005 is approximately$65,936.00. This includes the yearly accrued assessment from prior years (2002-2004) of$49,178.20 plus the estimated 2005 allocation of$16,757.80. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of the total 2002-2005 estimated assessment to fund the following projects: (1) The City sponsored SW 34t1i Street Culvert Replacement Project, and (2) the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department staff recommends that Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King County Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservation District fund allocation from 2002 to 2005. In addition, staff also requests that the Council approve using a portion ($4,869) of Renton's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1 I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\AgenBill-grant funds.doc\AQlp a AGREEMENT FOR AWARD OF NONCOMPETITIVE GRANT City of Renton This Agreement is made between the King Conservation District Number 9, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 935 Powell Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 (referred to herein as "District"), and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 1055 South Grady Way, Renton Washington 98055 (referred to herein as "Recipient"), for the purposes set forth herein. SECTION 1. RECITALS 1.1 Whereas, the District is a special purpose district organized and existing under authority of Chapter 89.08 RCW. The District engages in and provides certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and 1.2 Whereas, on December 15, 2000, the Metropolitan King County Council enacted King County Ordinance No. 14016 which, among other things,provides for the distribution of noncompetitive grant funds from a portion of the special assessments imposed by King County Ordinance No. 14016 and collected by the District pursuant to Chapter 89.08 RCW; and 1.3 Whereas, on November 19, 1998, the District adopted Resolution No. 98-20 relating to the policy and procedures governing the District's award of any noncompetitive grants authorized by King County; and 1.4 Whereas, the District has reviewed the grant application submitted by Recipient and has determined that the application meets the requirements of Chapter 89.08 RCW and the District's policy and procedures for awarding noncompetitive grants; and 1.5 Whereas, the District and Recipient desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of establishing the terms and conditions relating to the District's award of a noncompetitive grant to Recipient. SECTION 2. AGREEMENT 2.1 The District agrees to award Recipient a grant in the total amount of Fifty-five thousand eighty-four dollars and 85 cents ($55,084.85) ($10,618.51 from 2002 Assessments, $16,271.58 from 2003 Assessments, $16,656.05 from 2004 Assessments, and $11,538.71 from 2005 Assessments). Grant funds shall be used by Recipient solely for the performance of the work described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The District shall pay the grant funds to Recipient in accordance with the following paragraphs. 2.1.1 Grant funds from 2002, 2003, and 2004 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient within five (5) business days after District's receipt of a fully executed Agreement. - 1 - 2.1.2 Grant funds from 2005 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient on or before January 31, 2005, provided that such funds have been collected and received by the District and thereafter in quarterly installments as funds are received. 2.2 Recipient represents and warrants that it will only use the grant funds for the work described in Exhibit A, which may be amended by the parties pursuant to Paragraph 3.3 of the Agreement. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized work. Further, Recipient agrees to return to the District any grant funds that are not expended and/or remain after completion of the work covered by this Agreement. 2.3 Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the grant funds may only be expended on work which shall be entirely within the District's jurisdictional boundaries. The following municipal entities are not within the District's jurisdictional boundaries: Enumclaw, Federal Way, Milton, Pacific, and Skykomish. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for work performed outside the District's jurisdictional boundaries. 2.4 In the event the scope of work authorized by this Agreement includes the use of grant funds to purchase houses located on real property within a flood hazard area, Recipient acknowledges and agrees that grant funds may only be used for such purposes if the houses to be purchased were constructed before floodplain mapping or sensitive areas regulations were in place for that area. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized purposes. 2.5 Recipient shall be required to provide the District with biannual financial and project progress reports, along with an annual summary report. Financial and project reports shall be due May 31 and November 30 each year. The Recipient shall also be required to submit to the District a final report which documents the Recipient's completion of the work in conformance with this Agreement within thirty(30) days after the completion of the work. The final report shall, among other things, summarize the project's successes and shall address the regional benefits accomplished by the work. The final report shall also identify any obstacles or challenges which were encountered during the work, along with general recommendations regarding ways to avoid such obstacles or challenges in the future. If requested, Recipient agrees to provide the District with additional financial or progress reports from time to time, at reasonable intervals. 2.6 Recipient's expenditures of grant funds shall be separately identified in the Recipient's accounting records. If requested, Recipient shall comply with other reasonable requests made by the District with respect to the manner in which project expenditures are tracked and accounted for in Recipient's accounting books and records. Recipient shall maintain such records of expenditures as may be necessary to conform to generally accepted accounting principals and to meet the requirements of all applicable state and federal laws. - 2 - 2.7 Recipient shall be required to track project expenses using the Budget Accounting and Reporting System for the State of Washington ("BARS"). 2.8 The District or its representative shall have the right from time to time, at reasonable intervals, to audit the Recipient's books and records in order to verify compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Recipient shall cooperate with the District in any such audit. 2.9 Recipient shall retain all accounting records and project files relating to this Agreement in accordance with criteria established in the Revised Code of Washington and the Washington State Archivist. 2.10 Recipient shall ensure that all work performed by Recipient or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors is performed in a manner which protects and safeguards the environment and natural resources and which is in compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations. Recipient shall implement an appropriate monitoring system or program to ensure compliance with this provision. 2.11 Recipient agrees that in the event a court of competent jurisdiction finds that the imposition or collection of the special assessments authorized by King County Ordinance No. 14016 are unlawful and orders the repayment of such assessments, Recipient agrees to reimburse the District for the full amount of the grant award, including any interest which may be awarded by the court. 2.12 Recipient agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, its agents, officers, officials and employees from all claims, alleged liability, damages, losses to or death of person or damage to property allegedly resulting from the acts of the Recipient or any of its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. 2.13 Recipient agrees to acknowledge the District as a source of funding for this project on all literature, signage or press releases related to said project. SECTION 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 3.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No prior or contemporaneous representation, inducement, promise or agreement between or among the parties which relate to the subject matter hereof which are not embodied in this Agreement shall be of any force or effect. 3.3 No amendment to this Agreement shall be binding on any of the parties to this Agreement unless such amendment is in writing and is executed by the parties. The parties - 3 - contemplate that this Agreement may from time to time be modified by written amendment which shall be executed by duly authorized representatives of the parties and attached to this Agreement. 3.4 Each party warrants and represents that such party has full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement and each person executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents that he/she has been fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and that such party is bound by the signature of such representative. 3.5 Expenditure of grant funds shall be subject to appropriation by the Metropolitan King County Council. DISTRICT: RECIPIENT: By By Name Name Title Title Date Date Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form: DISTRICT LEGAL COUNSEL: RECIPIENT'S ATTORNEY: � w By C,ti� /l,l, By Name f C C ,�YN CXJ� Name Date C 13 G Date - 4 - Exhibit A Project Name: SW 341h Street Culvert Contact: Allen Quynn Replacement Project Applicant: City of Renton Title: Project Manager Principal Partners (if any): Address: 1055 S. Grady Way City of Renton Renton, WA 98055 Total Project Cost: $900,000 estimated Phone: 425-430-7247 KCD Funding Requested: $55,084.85 Fax: 425-430-7247 Project Start Date: April 2005 E-mail: a u nn ci.renton.wa.us Project End Date: Fall 2007 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): The purpose of this project is to replace the existing Springbrook Creek culvert crossing of SW 34`h Street in Renton, Washington. The crossing consists of 4 existing, undersized corrugated metal (CMP) culverts that will be replaced with a new box culvert. Springbrook Creek is the main drainage channel for the 24-square mile Black River Basin that includes portions of the Cities of Renton, Kent, Tukwila and unincorporated King County. Springbrook Creek drains to the Black River Pump Station where flows are pumped into the Green River(see attached figures 6-1 and 6-2). The fisheries resources within Springbrook Creek include Chinook and Coho salmon, steelhead and cutthroat trout. The existing culverts were constructed in 1980 and are a major restriction of flows that contribute to the flooding problems in portions of the south valley during storm events. The project consists of the following elements: • Construction of a new box culvert including stream bypass. • Placement of spawning gravel in the bottom of the culvert. • Placement of woody debris on the sides of the channel. • Planting of riparian trees and shrubs along channel bank. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts, provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): The project will accomplish the following objectives: • Eliminate flooding of the SW 34`b Street/Springbrook Creek crossing during the 100-yr storm event. • Lower upstream water levels,which will increase the capacity of local storm systems in Lind Avenue and SW 34`h Street. • Upsizing the SW 34`h Street culvert in conjunction with future pipe system improvements will help the City meet flood protection goals in the valley. • Provide improved fish passage and riparian habitat for salmonid migration. The following provides a brief description of how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.01: "To prepare and keep current a comprehensive long-range program recommending the conservation of all the renewable natural resources of the District. Such King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application programs shall be directed toward the best use of renewable natural resources and in a manner that will best meet the needs of the District and the state, taking into consideration, where appropriate, such uses as farming, grazing,timber supply, forest, parks, outdoor recreation, potable water supplies for urban and rural areas, water for agriculture, minimal flow, and industrial uses, watershed stabilization, control of soil erosion, retardation of water run-off, flood prevention and control, reservoirs and other water storage, restriction of developments of flood plains, protection of open space and scenery, preservation of natural beauty, protection of fish and wildlife, preservation of wilderness areas and wild rivers,the prevention or reduction of sedimentation and other pollution in rivers and other waters, and such location of highways, schools, housing developments, industries, airports and other facilities and structures as will fit the needs of the state and be consistent with the best uses of the renewable natural resources of the state. The program shall include an inventory of all renewable natural resources in the District, a compilation of current resource needs, projections of future resource requirements, priorities for various resource activities,projected timetables, descriptions of available alternatives, and provisions for coordination with other resource programs. Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project meets the above criteria by reducing flooding of SW 341h Street as well as upstream storm systems that discharge to Springbrook Creek. The new culvert will be designed to prevent flooding of the SW 341h Street crossing during the 100-yr storm event and lower tail water conditions for outfalls discharging upstream. The project will also help protect fish by lowering stream velocities during storm events through the new culvert to facilitate fish passage. KCD Strategic Plan Initiate.- This proposal meets the strategic plan element 2,d(Ili)Support for Regional Conservation Initiatives, which states: "The District will join in regional conservation initiatives,lending its leadership and expertise on issues such as major river flooding, preserving and restoring fish habitat, protecting and restoring water quality in watersheds and general public conservation education programs in the region". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is one element of a series of projects recommended in the City of Renton's 1997 East Side Green River Watershed Plan and EIS (ESGRWP), which was a basin wide planning level study to identify projects that would help reduce the flooding in the Renton valley area. The ESGRWP identified the replacement of the SW 341h Street crossing of Springbrook Creek to reduce upstream water levels and improve fish passage. As discussed under the previous criteria, the proposed project will eliminate flooding of SW 34" Street during the 100-yr storm as well as reduce flooding in local storm systems upstream that discharge to the creek. The project will also improve water quality and provide wildlife habitat with the addition of riparian plantings such as native shrubs and trees along the channel bank. In-stream woody debris will also be added to provide fish rearing and refuge habitat. Springbrook Creek is within Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA)9. The draft WR1A 9 Salmon Habitat Plan identifies the need for improving fish passage riparian habitat and water quality to benefit Chinook salmon and other salmonids. HA1File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I l-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant appli cation.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Regional Funding Principles Established by the King County Regional Task Force The project satisfies regional task force funding principles criteria 3,1(ii), which states: "Habitat restoration which enhances ecological significant fish runs". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is located on Springbrook Creek, which historically has poor water quality, particularly low dissolved oxygen due to high water temperatures. The basin, especially the valley floor has become highly urbanized with large commercial and industrial areas that directly discharge to Springbrook Creek. This project will address water quality by planting plants and trees along the channel bank that will help provide shade and help cool the creek during the summer months. Woody debris will also be incorporated into the project to provide channel rearing and refuge habitat for salmon. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Project activities include the following: • Replace existing undersized culverts with a new box culvert to increase conveyance capacity and reduce flooding of SW 34`h Street and upstream storm pipe systems. • Construct stream bypass during provide dewatering of groundwater during construction. • Relocate utilities. • Provide a more natural and better-lined streambed to enhance fish passage. This includes adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert. • Provide riparian habitat planting including a mix of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Measurable Results include: • After project construction, observe lower water surface elevations in the channel upstream of SW 34`h Street during high flow events. • A year after construction complete, observe the establishment of native riparian plants in areas planted as part of project restoration. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Total City of Renton Salaries and Benefits Travel/Meals/Mileage Office/Field Supplies Contracted/Professional $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 Services Land Acquisition Permits Other TOTAL $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. H1File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Funding will be acknowledged, reported and tracked using the State of Washington Accounting and Reporting System or"BARS". The use of taxpayer funds provided through the King Conservation District for the above-described projects will be acknowledged through newspaper articles,websites or other information released during project implementation. Attachments Gregg Z' rman Date PBPW Ad 'str 2 or HAFile Svs\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Chants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp _ East Side Gtf n River Black River King County �.• - I Watershed Bundary Water Quality Management Plan s.•� Study Area ,,.i'' ` -'' `'�' �, ,• , •• ...-.-...-r _ , ._. r � ,•'' L � ••����' Gee �-----• '� -t � r - -Z..J '``-' � ':� o L. .� ••' ,�,�e Panther Lake i I �,•' o ••• ! ~ Qom 1 I I 1 �• LKing Count Garrison 405 I I I 1 Renton Creek Renton King County rJ I �•��r' U er .J '� fJ _.—Sp.r ngbrook•fir. C._._._.f �._._._..i �'..f ♦,N.,• Valley Area � _ ` 167 Kent �� r : Springbrook Creek East Valley Road �� 1 Springbrook Creek f Renton n/iil� 167 ��.i Tukwila Black River~'� i� een i T 181 181 Pump Station i ukwi/o N f L._.J N Kent Tukwila ; C Kent Lagoons t—' ♦. 1 —� 1 EAST SIDE GREEN RrVER 1 1-5 Ri��r WATERSHED PROJECT b 1 � � 0 3000 6000 > FIGURE 6-1 0 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET ` PROJECT AREA < - An Am I Y I (y) RCS SMITHERS I i RENTON LLj ---------------------------....... cz, 9. SHOPPING < I - ; ---:: .......... AV 4IR6- ............. RD S .............. 'L......... mo 10, ....... ---------- ............- - ENTER RRIS AV S . ...........- .............. 41 '5- CREEK WHI T- ROLLING V); 0 ........... .............................. ....................... .............. f-T.7..... ——------------ LU SHATTUCK pffis Ln B VALLEY ......... TA OT GENERAL 4. ........ WE P HOSPITAL ------------ S i ............. ............. SR- 36"x48* BOX 60" 67.. 36' .......... x U ................... E E VALLEY RD VALLEY ca RD iz! IV C4 k Co 4 0 ov;yj .......... V) D. ............ 11-1405 LIN AV S LIND AV sw ....... ............... SW 3TStreet Culvert 72: 1 Replacement Project : Ln 21" V) -4 LL- 0........... ----------- SCALE 1"=1000 THOMAS AV SW V)f -C Q7-j vlk. C,4 POWELL AV SW V) CONNECTING CHANNEL PROJECT 7;� 4 (COMPLETED • -------------------------- 60" OAKESDALE AV SW 36 1995) LEGEND Co %r VALLEY AREA 36" 36" DIAMETER STORM DRAIN (STUDY AREA) CIO- STREAM/DRAINAGE CHANNEL CULVERT(S) JACKSON SW V MILL F PUMP ............ ............. ............ ......... CREEK STATION FLOOD WATER R� RR STORAGE POND TIJKWII A RENTON CITY LIMITS 0 EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER --------- WATERSHED PROJECT RR HWY E3LACi�-,,\\\\ Ley FIGURE 6-2 z F A NVER .......... PUMP RENTON VALLEY AREA STATION % EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM 'o C� TO GREEN—DUWAMISH RIVER AGREEMENT FOR AWARD OF NONCOMPETITIVE GRANT Black River Watershed Alliance This Agreement is made between the King Conservation District Number 9, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 935 Powell Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 (referred to herein as "District"), and the Black River Watershed Alliance, a non-profit organization in King County, Washington, located at 16444 SE 135" Street, Renton Washington 98059 (referred to herein as "Recipient"), for the purposes set forth herein. SECTION 1. RECITALS 1.1 Whereas, the District is a special purpose district organized and existing under authority of Chapter 89.08 RCW. The District engages in and provides certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and 1.2 Whereas, on December 15, 2000, the Metropolitan King County Council enacted King County Ordinance No. 14016 which, among other things,provides for the distribution of noncompetitive grant funds from a portion of the special assessments imposed by King County Ordinance No. 14016 and collected by the District pursuant to Chapter 89.08 RCW; and 1.3 Whereas, on November 19, 1998, the District adopted Resolution No. 98-20 relating to the policy and procedures governing the District's award of any noncompetitive grants authorized by King County; and 1.4 Whereas, the District has reviewed the grant application submitted by Recipient and has determined that the application meets the requirements of Chapter 89.08 RCW and the District's policy and procedures for awarding noncompetitive grants; and 1.5 Whereas, the District and Recipient desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of establishing the terms and conditions relating to the District's award of a noncompetitive grant to Recipient. SECTION 2. AGREEMENT 2.1 The District agrees to award Recipient a grant in the total amount of Four thousand eight-hundred sixty-nine Dollars ($4,869) from 2002 Assessments. Grant funds shall be used by Recipient solely for the performance of the work described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Grant funds from 2002 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient within five (5) business days after District's receipt of a fully executed Agreement. 2.2 Recipient represents and warrants that it will only use the grant funds for the work described in Exhibit A, which may be amended by the parties pursuant to Paragraph 3.3 of the - 1 - Agreement. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized work. Further, Recipient agrees to return to the District any grant funds that are not expended and/or remain after completion of the work covered by this Agreement. 2.3 Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the grant funds may only be expended on work which shall be entirely within the District's jurisdictional boundaries. The following municipal entities are not within the District's jurisdictional boundaries: Enumclaw, Federal Way, Milton, Pacific, and Skykomish. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for work performed outside the District's jurisdictional boundaries. 2.4 In the event the scope of work authorized by this Agreement includes the use of grant funds to purchase houses located on real property within a flood hazard area, Recipient acknowledges and agrees that grant funds may only be used for such purposes if the houses to be purchased were constructed before floodplain mapping or sensitive areas regulations were in place for that area. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized purposes. 2.5 Recipient shall be required to provide the District with biannual financial and project progress reports, along with an annual summary report. Financial and project reports shall be due May 31 and November 30 each year. The Recipient shall also be required to submit to the District a final report which documents the Recipient's completion of the work in conformance with this Agreement within thirty(30) days after the completion of the work. The final report shall, among other things, summarize the project's successes and shall address the regional benefits accomplished by the work. The final report shall also identify any obstacles or challenges which were encountered during the work, along with general recommendations regarding ways to avoid such obstacles or challenges in the future. If requested, Recipient agrees to provide the District with additional financial or progress reports from time to time, at reasonable intervals. 2.6 Recipient's expenditures of grant funds shall be separately identified in the Recipient's accounting records. If requested, Recipient shall comply with other reasonable requests made by the District with respect to the manner in which project expenditures are tracked and accounted for in Recipient's accounting books and records. Recipient shall maintain such records of expenditures as may be necessary to conform to generally accepted accounting principals and to meet the requirements of all applicable state and federal laws. 2.7 Recipient shall be required to track project expenses using the Budget Accounting and Reporting System for the State of Washington ("BARS"). 2.8 The District or its representative shall have the right from time to time, at reasonable intervals, to audit the Recipient's books and records in order to verify compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Recipient shall cooperate with the District in any such audit. 2.9 Recipient shall retain all accounting records and project files relating to this Agreement in accordance with criteria established in the Revised Code of Washington and the Washington State Archivist. - 2 - 2.10 Recipient shall ensure that all work performed by Recipient or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors is performed in a manner which protects and safeguards the environment and natural resources and which is in compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations. Recipient shall implement an appropriate monitoring system or program to ensure compliance with this provision. 2.11 Recipient agrees that in the event a court of competent jurisdiction finds that the imposition or collection of the special assessments authorized by King County Ordinance No. 14016 are unlawful and orders the repayment of such assessments, Recipient agrees to reimburse the District for the full amount of the grant award, including any interest which may be awarded by the court. 2.12 Recipient agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, its agents, officers, officials and employees from all claims, alleged liability, damages, losses to or death of person or damage to property allegedly resulting from the acts of the Recipient or any of its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. 2.13 Recipient agrees to acknowledge the District as a source of funding for this project on all literature, signage or press releases related to said project. SECTION 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 3.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No prior or contemporaneous representation, inducement, promise or agreement between or among the parties which relate to the subject matter hereof which are not embodied in this Agreement shall be of any force or effect. 3.3 No amendment to this Agreement shall be binding on any of the parties to this Agreement unless such amendment is in writing and is executed by the parties. The parties contemplate that this Agreement may from time to time be modified by written amendment which shall be executed by duly authorized representatives of the parties and attached to this Agreement. 3.4 Each party warrants and represents that such party has full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement and each person executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents that he/she has been fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and that such party is bound by the signature of such representative. 3.5 Expenditure of grant funds shall be subject to appropriation by the Metropolitan King County Council. - 3 - DISTRICT: RECIPIENT: By By Name Name Title Title Date Date Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form: DISTRICT LEGAL COUNSEL: RECIPIENT'S ATTORNEY: By A-c- C- By Name 0 dl Name Date Date - 4 - Exhibit A King Conservation District 1 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Project Name: Black River Channel Native Contact: Doris Yepez Plant Restoration Project Applicant: Doris Yepez Title: Project Coordinator Phase 1 Fiscal Agent: Seattle Audubon Society Phase 2 Fiscal Agent: D Principal Partners (if any): Address: 16444 SE 135`h St. City of Renton Renton,WA 98059 Friends of Black River Herons Forever Duwamish Tribe Total Project Cost: $53,559.00 Phone: 425 891-0730 KCD Funding Requested: $4,869.00 Fax: 425 917-0872 Project Start Date: 9/29/2004 E-mail: dorisdandelion ahoo.com Project End Date: Spring 2008 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): There are two phases to the Black River Channel Restoration Project, Phase 1 and Phase 2, and the funding requested covers both Phases. The goals for both Phases are to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, and develop community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. Phase 1 began September 29, 2004, and concludes in Spring 2007 with a commitment to maintain and monitor the restoration site for two years. The restoration area for Phase 1 is .83 of an acre in size and located on the south bank of the Black River Channel, off of Monster Road SW, adjacent and immediately downstream from the DNRP Black River Pump Station and upstream from the Monster Road Bridge. Much of the work has been completed to date and included: 1. The removal of invasive plants on the top 20 ft. of the riverbank and in the adjoining field. 2. The removal of 11 ecology blocks left on the property. 3. Scarification of the soil to loosen the gravelly soil on half of the field area. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger. 5. Soil amendments. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs. 7. Installation of a drip irrigation system to increase the survival rate of the newly planted native vegetation. What remains is the monitoring and maintenance of the restoration site for the two year committed period. Phase 2 will begin in Fall 2005 and will conclude Spring 2008. Phase 2 is on the south bank as well,but immediately upstream from, and adjacent to,the DNRP Black River Pump Station. The restoration area is approximately '/z acre in size. As in Phase 1,the goal is to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, as well as expand community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. The new site will also be monitored and maintained for two years. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts, provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The project objectives are: • Provide shade, food sources and habitat improvements for the fish and wildlife through the removal of invasive weeds and the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs. • Acquaint the community and students with the Black River. • Educate the community and students about the Black River Channel Restoration Project and the Black River watershed, forest and channel ecosystem. • Involve the community and students in the restoration work. The following provides a brief description of specifically how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.450: "Watershed restoration projects--Intent. The legislature declares that it is the goal of the state of Washington to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular, fish and wildlife and their habitat. It is further the policy of the state insofar as possible to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals." Description of how this project meets the first part of the criteria "to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and, in particular, fish and wildlife and their habitat": This project restores the riparian habitat along the Black River Channel and adjoining field, and improves the fish and wildlife habitat. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs restores the area to its more natural state. In addition,the native trees planted along the riverbank will provide shade that will keep the temperatures of the water at a more desirable level for salmonids. The debris from the trees and shrubs, leaves falling, will also provide a source of food for the fish; and fallen trees will act as LWD, (Large Woody Debris),which give salmon areas to rest and spawn. The field area, with the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs, will provide a buffer from the noise and pollution of the street, as well as provide a diversity of food sources for the other wildlife, producing berries and flowers at different times of year. Also, once grown in,the vegetation will provide more habitat areas for the wildlife. Description of how this project meets the second part of the criteria"to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals": During Phase 1, there were four community events: one day for planting, two others for mulching and weeding, and the last was the installation of the drip irrigation system.Numerous groups helped with these tasks including Renton Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, Campfire Girls, Herons Forever members,Friends of Black River, Duwamish tribal members, Sierra Club members,Boeing volunteers and the Briarwood Student Leadership Group. The same volunteer organizations will be asked to help with Phase 2 in order to increase the groups' sense of connection and commitment to the Black River and to give them the opportunity to see the growth and progress made through their participation in the restoration tasks during Phase 1. KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria As stated in the KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria, Section b ii): "Promoting Natural Habitat Restoration. The District will provide information and assistance to landowners, businesses, and other HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application citizens in rural and urban areas on the preservation and restoration of natural habitats including the creation of low-maintenance native plant habitats that conserve water and are friendly to wildlife, eco- landscaping, establishing naturescaping demonstration sites, intrusive species management and community stewardship". Description of how this project meets this criteria: The restoration work included, in Phase 1,the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field area, as well as the removal of other invasive shrubs such as the Butterfly bush. Maintenance of the restoration site includes weeding, specifically focusing on removing the new growth of Himalayan blackberries and Butterfly bush, and removing other weeds on the site that are on the Washington State and/or King County Noxious Weed List, namely, Tansy ragwort, Bull thistle and Oxeye daisy. Other invasive weeds will be removed as needed. Phase 2 also calls for the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field areas, and the removal of other noxious weeds present,which include Japanese knotweed. During Phase 1, community stewardship has been developed through the involvement of the different volunteer organizations in the restoration tasks and in the presentation of the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to four different groups. As stated in the KCD Strategic Initiative Section d, i): "Population Growth and Increased Urbanization. The District will actively promote workable solutions that help minimize the effects of population growth and increased urbanization on the natural environment." Description of how this project meets these criteria: When the planted native trees get larger,they will create a dense wooded area, a small forest, in a highly urbanized setting. The planting of trees in urban areas is very beneficial to the environment. Trees absorb contaminants, control erosion, reduce storm- water run-off by absorbing water through their roots,clean the air, and as stated above, are beneficial to the fish and wildlife by providing more shade, additional food sources and habitat. The trees, with the falling of large wooded debris, also enhance our stream systems. The grassy, field area that was part of the restoration site in Phase 1 was under laid with gravel to accommodate the trucks when the Black River Pump Station was built. One of the restoration tasks, during Phase 1, included ripping up the gravelly field and planting native trees, shrubs and forbs. Mulch was also added throughout the field area. The addition of mulch, and the decomposition of native vegetation in the future, will enrich the soil and help rebuild it. KCD Regional FundingPrinciples rinci lames As stated in the# 3 KCD Regional Funding Principles, iv), "Water quality and watershed restoration and protection support services such as coordination of monitoring(data collection, studies, evaluation) and public education programs". Description of how this project meets this criterion: During Phase 2, community involvement will expand to include the Renton schools and other local schools. Presently, there are two Renton schools,Lindbergh High School and Black River High School,which have provided written commitments to involve their students in hands-on learning at the Black River, as well as introducing a Black River component into their science curriculum. The Black River Riparian Forest, Channel and restoration areas will be used as a living laboratory for students to learn about scientific methods and concepts and to learn about the Black River and its components. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The Black River Restoration Project will also be included as an option in a tour sponsored by the King County Waste Treatment program, Wheels to Water.A visit to the South Treatment Plant will include a tour of the Black River and the opportunity to participate in restoration tasks or learn about the history and components of the Black River through a walking tour of the Forest, Channel and restoration sites. In addition to the above, the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation shown to different groups during Phase 1, helped educate the public about the restoration work and the Black River. The PowerPoint presentations will also be shown to new groups participating in Phase 2. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Phase 1: 1. Removal of invasive weeds: Himalayan blackberries were rampant on the riverbank and on a small vegetation island in the middle of the field. There were a few other invasives such as the Butterfly bush, but the Himalayan blackberry was the predominant invasive weed with a 50- 60% ground cover on the riverbank and a 35% ground cover on the island. Most of the invasive blackberries on the restoration site have been eradicated through the cutting and grubbing of the blackberries. Earthcorps was hired to cut and grub the blackberries on the top 20 ft. of the bank. Volunteers and salaried crew have removed the remainder of the blackberries on the island,and have been tackling the new growth of the Himalayan blackberry that is popping up throughout the site. A salaried person has also been cutting blackberries on the lower part of the bank, beyond the 20 ft., and throughout the site. 2. Removal of ecology blocks: There were 11 ecology blocks on the site before the project began. These have all been removed with the help of King County roads crew. 3. Ripping up of the gravelly field: Before the restoration work, the entire field area was grown over with grass and under laid with gravel that was deposited when the Black River Pump Station was built. It was almost impossible to dig into the field to plant native vegetation since the ground was so compacted. Half of the gravelly field was ripped up with the use of a backhoe,to allow for planting, and now the soil is looser. Thrushes were observed, on at least two different occasions, pecking at the soil since it has been loosened. The backhoe also removed the other invasive shrubs that were in the island. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger: In the other half of the gravelly field, 20 rows of planting holes were dug with an auger. The field area is being used as a test site to see which side produces better results, the augured field area or the area where the backhoe ripped up the gravel and grass. 5. Soil amendments: Approximately 60 cubic yards of mulch was spread throughout the field area of the restoration site beginning January 2005 through May 2005. The mulch helps with weed control; helps keep some moisture close to the newly planted native vegetation, and will enhance the soil as it decays. The soil in the field area is nutrient poor, and some plants are in need of fertilizer. Biosolids are in the process of being purchased from the South Waste Treatment Plant to place around the plants that need some fertilizing. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs: Most of the native plants were planted in January 2005. Some were planted in February 2005, and approximately 10 more were donated and planted in May 2005. There has been less than a 2% mortality rate, and those were mostly the Pacific madrones, which have the reputation of being difficult to plant. 7. Installation of the drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system was installed in April 2005. A drip system is crucial at this site, especially in the field area, since the soil is very well-drained and does not retain water. A few of the native plants had yellowed a little with the early heat spell in February/March, but once the drip irrigation system was running,the plants regained their healthy, green look. The drip irrigation system is attached to the faucet at the Pump Station HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 5 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application and is turned on at least 4 times a week by the Pump Station crew, and occasionally on hot and dry weekends, by the restoration project coordinator. 8. Community involvement: The community has shown interest and support, evidenced with the large numbers of participants. For two of the community activity days, there were over 50 volunteers helping on each of those days. 9. Monitoring and maintenance: The project is being monitored and maintained at least twice a month. Partners to the grant, Herons Forever and Friends of Black River members, are helping with the maintenance and monitoring. Monitoring includes tracking the condition of the native vegetation,the growth of the invasive weeds, checking the drip irrigation system and noting any wildlife in the area. Maintenance includes protecting the native vegetation from being eaten, if necessary; removing the invasive weeds by either weed whacking, or manually cutting then grubbing, as in the case of the blackberries; replacing dead native vegetation and repairing, if necessary, the drip irrigation system. Monitoring and maintenance is very important in helping the native plants thrive as well as ensuring that they will not be out competed by the invasive weeds or eaten by wildlife. The project activities and measurable results for Phase 2 include: 1. Planning and organizing: A Scope of Work Budget for King County needs to be completed before December 2005. Dates for the different restoration tasks need to be set, vendors need to be contacted, materials need to be purchased, subcontractors need to be lined up, requests for payments and other paperwork need to be submitted to King County throughout the project. Other grant paperwork needs to be completed including a report to KCD. Reports are submitted to partners on a regular basis. Media will be solicited for the various community events. Planning and organizing is critical for the project to run smoothly and to get the needed tasks done. 2. Contacting different volunteer organizations: Different volunteer organizations will be contacted to help with the native planting,mulching and installation of the drip irrigation system. Involving the community will develop community stewardship of the Black River. We will attempt to involve the same organizations as last year,to strengthen community stewardship, and contact new groups as well. The new groups will be shown the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to acquaint them with the Black River and to build some desire and enthusiasm to help with the restoration tasks. 3. Contacting Lindbergh and Black River High Schools to set up dates for student participation in the restoration project and discuss the specifics of the addition of the Black River into the science curriculum. 4. Developing a tour schedule with the Wheels to Water Program and writing up an oral presentation for the tour. 5. Removing invasive weeds: The invasive weeds account for at least 90% of the present groundcover, and most of the weeds are Himalayan blackberry. The weeds need to be removed in order to plant native vegetation. The roots of the weeds will be removed to inhibit the return growth of the weeds. The abundant Himalayan blackberries create a monoculture with a food source that has limited value since it is not eaten by much of the wildlife. 6. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs: Approximately 500 trees, shrubs and forbs will be planted with numerous species of each.Native vegetation will enhance the area by providing food sources, shade and habitat for the wildlife; and a diversity of native vegetation will provide a variety of food and habitat sources.Native trees will also control erosion, storm-water run-off, clean the air and absorb contaminants in the soil. 7. Sol] amendments: Mulch will be added around the areas where the native vegetation is planted. Mulch will help retain the moisture in the soil, control weeds as well as enrich the soil as it decays. A natural fertilizer, such as biosolids, will be added as necessary. HAF'ile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 6 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 8. Installing a drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system will keep the native vegetation hydrated and increase their chance of survival. Watering is critical especially during the area's dry summer months. 9. Maintenance and monitoring of the restoration site: Monitoring includes checking and recording the condition of the native plants, the drip irrigation system, the growth of the invasive weeds and wildlife activity. Maintenance involves repairing the drip irrigation system, removing the growing weeds, replacing dead native plants and protecting the native plants from being eaten by wildlife. Frequent maintenance and monitoring will help keep the invasive growth from getting out of control and help insure the successful growth of the native vegetation as well as catch any other problems that come up. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Other Total King County Funds Waterworks (specify) Grant Salaries and Benefits $1,034 $14,000 $15,034 Travel/Meals/Mileage $253 $2,043 $2,296 Office/Field Supplies $3,489 $12,728 $16,217 Contracted/Professional $15,138 $15,138 Services Land Acquisition Permits $93 97 190 Other( <isca.l Agents) $4,684 $4,684 TOTAL $4,869 $48,690 $53,559 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. The KCD contribution will be noted on the signs that will be placed at the two restoration sites upon the termination of the project. King County has been advised that KCD funds will potentially be the source of the cash match for the project for both phases. Any newspaper articles or photos will acknowledge KCD as a contributor to the project. KCD will be acknowledged as a contributor and partner in the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation. KCD will also be mentioned and acknowledged in other correspondence related to the project. I regg Zi r n,P.L Date PBPW Ad ' 'strator HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division/ Surface December 5, 2005 Water Utility Staff Contact...... Ron Straka (ext. 7248) Allen Quynn (ext. 7247) Agenda Status Consent.............. X Subject: Public Hearing.. 2002-2 05,sing onservation District Agreement for Corresprck,,c .. Nonco Grants Ordinan .... Resoluti ... A' Old Bus .... c v'V . Exhibits: New Bu .....Issue Paper Study S .....Resolution Informa ... 6� Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grants Recommended Action: Approv s: Council Concur Legal D t......... X Finance t...... Other............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $0 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... $59,953.85 (requested fund allocation for 2002-2005) Total Project Budget... City Share Total Project... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The King Consery ' n trict (KCD) agreement allows the transfer of the City of Renton' $In'p� parcel share oft $5.pede arcel KCD Assessment of parcels within Renton. The grant fun be used on proj is approved by KCD such as water quality, habitat enhancement, water and fisheries resource protection projects and programs. The current estimated balance of the grant funding available to the City from 2002 through 2005 is approximately$65,936.00. This includes the yearly accrued assessment from prior years (2002-2004) of$49,178.20 plus the estimated 2005 allocation of$16,757.80. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of the total 2002-2005 estimated assessment to fund the following projects: (1) The City sponsored SW 34'' Street Culvert Replacement Project, and (2) the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department staff recommends that Council rove a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the n Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservatio trict allocation from 2002 to 2005. In addition, staff also requests that the Council approve using a portion ($4,869) of Renton's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\AgenBill-grant funds.doc\AQlp Y O PLANNING/BUILDING/ e, , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 5, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor Allen Quynn, Surface Water Engineer SUBJECT: 2002-2005 King Conservation District Agreement for Noncompetitive Grants ISSUE: Should the Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to (1) execute an agreement with the King Conservation District(KCD)to accept the City of Renton annual share of the approved King Conservation District assessment, and (2) approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance? RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department staff recommends that Council a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the n County Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservation ii allocation from 2002 to 2005. In addition, staff also requests that the Council approve using a portion($4,869) of Renton's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The City of Renton became a member of the King Conservation District in March 1992, upon the passage of Resolution No. 2885. At that time, the King County Council approved a $1.25 per parcel assessment against all properties within jurisdictions that are members of the King Conservation District on August 16, 1993. PAAA �" Subsequently, rdinance 12959, approved by the King my Council in December 1997, adopted the Regional Water Quality Committee's reco menda 'on to raise the Conservation District annual assessment from $1.25 per parcel t $5.per arcel. The $1.25 per parcel assessment had been in place since the King County Co cil ted Ordinance 10981 in Terri Briere December 5,2005 Page 2 of 2 August 1993 and was renewed in 1995 by Ordinance 12095. The rdinances provide that the generated revenues be distributed as follows: J$L'Ver r' uted equally to each of the five watershed forums p cel to the County and each city in the District from which the funds were collected cel to the District for implementation of its approved work program. The District will either spend the funds in cities by providing services, or will transfer the funding to the cities to be used as financial assistance for stream restoration, fish habitat, and/or water quality projects. Based on the assessment collected in 2004 by the King Conservation District, the annual share available to Renton is approximately$16,393 per year. The grant funds could be used to pay the District for specific additional services or could be transferred to the City for use on eligible projects. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of a total KCD assessment from 2002 through 2005 estimated at$65,936. The amount of the agreement does not match the total estimated assessment due to the fact that the agreement amount is based on the approved grant application submitted in July of this year. The amount requested in the application was based on the estimated 2005 assessment at the time the application was prepared. Since that time,the estimated 2005 assessment has been revised by KCD to include an additional $6,000.15. Although the balance of$6,000.15 cannot be used under the 2005 agreement, it will be available for the City to use for future projects covered under a separate grant application and subsequent agreement. The KCD assessment will be used to fund the City sponsored SW 34th Street Drainage Improvement Project($55,084.85) and the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored the Black River Watershed Alliance ($4,869). Both of these projects will help to restore fish habitat as well as improve water quality in the Springbrook Creek Basin. Attac dais brief descripti of projects that are being requested for funding by the district for thi Also attach d[)is copy of an agreement to allow the transfer of funds from the King Conservation Distri e City along with a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. CONCLUSION: Council approves a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with the King Conservation District to accept the City of Renton share of the approved King Conservation District assessment and approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. HA\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1 I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation DistrictUssue Paper.docAQlp CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: ' Cao"'` TO: Terri Briere,Wresident ounci em er 6 - VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler," &I FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator tic Wor-lfs-Departtment STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, tu4Qr-W;- Allen Quynri�� �jsli° E►.r�� 7' SUBJECT: 2002-2005 King Conservation District Agreement for Noncompetitive Grants ISSUE: v rrv�- Should the Council 4#6via resolution authorizin the M r ity Clerk t execute an agreement with the King Conservation District (KCD), au' he City of Rentoi$annual share of the approved King Conservation District assessmer n pprove the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoratio roject sponsored by the Black River Watershe y Alliance? a fun E placed in a S ater tility co elp j rojects v AJ rids. rant-funding will be use Ovate uality, On / plantinVnd habitat enh nt p cts. RECOMMENDATION: fc«w rn �..:, e U ifit Systems`Diyision a�n3gfB srles I3epartrrie recommends the of ing: • Council ap ovVof a resoluti uthorizing the Mayo nd City Clerk t�execute an agreement with the King nsery District accepting a portion o e City of Renton's share of the approved King C ervation District assessment. • Coun ' pprovIthe use o portion ($4,869) of Renton's share of KC rids for the Black er Channel Restoration Pro* ct sponsored by the Black River,,Watershed 'ance. v�S e 5 6 C6w.� �. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of- Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division/ Surface December 5, 2005 Water Utility Staff Contact...... Ron Straka (ext. 7248) Agenda Status Allen Quynn (ext. 7247) ; Consent.............. X Subject: Public Hearing.. KhTg-reservation--District Agreement For Correspondence.. Noncompetitive Grants Ordinance............. Resolution............ F� Old Business........ Exhibits: New Business....... Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Resolution t Information......... Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grants Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... X Other............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $0 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... $59,953.85 (requested fund allocation for 2002-2005) Total Project Budget... City Share Total Project... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The King Conservation District (KCD) agreement allows the transfer of the City of Renton's $1 per parcel share of the $5 per parcel KCD Assessment of parcels within Renton. The grant funding can be used on projects that are approved by KCD such as water quality, habitat enhancement, water and fisheries resource protection projects and programs. The current estimated balance of the grant funding available to the City from 2002 through 2005 is approximately$65,936.00. This includes the yearly accrued assessment from prior years (2002-2004) of$49,178.20 plus the estimated 2005 allocation of$16,757.80. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of the total�002=2005'estimated assessment o fund the following projects0fhe City sponsored SW 34tn Street Culvert Replacement Project anhie Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Departmedi ecommends Councilkapprov:l a rXin / authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King County ConsDistrict to accept the City of ton's share of the King Conservation District fund allm 2002 to 2005. In addition �so request4that the Council approve using a portion of Rentons assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project. 5�a����t�� by i-- H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\AgenBill-grant funds.doc\AQtp ,-i ,) November-22,-2005 Page 2 . ' �; BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The City of Renton became a member of the King Conservation District in March 1992, upon the passage of Resolution No. 2885. At that tim he King County Council approved a $1.25 per parcel assessment against all properties within jurisVtions that are members of the King Conservation District on August 16, 1993. Subsequently, K.C. Ordinance 12959, approved by the King County Council in December 1997, adopted the Regional Water Quality Committee's recommendation to raise the Conservation District annual assessment from $1.25 per parcel to $5 per parcel. The $1.25 per parcel assessment had been in place since the King County Council adopted Ordinance 10981 in August 1993 and was renewed in 1995 by Ordinance 12095. The Ordinances provide that the generated revenues be distributed as follows: • $3 distributed equally to each of the five watershed forums • $1 per parcel to the County and each city in the District from which the funds were collectedxaFA-- • $1 per parcel to the District for implementation of its approved work program The District wilApend the funds in cities by-providing service vItransfer the funding to the cities to be used as financial assistance for stream restoration, fish habitat, and/or water quality projects. Based on the assessment collected in 2004 by the King Conservation District, the annual share available to Renton is approximately $16,393 per year. The grant funds could be used to pay the District for specific additional services or could be transferred to the City for use onXeligible project sj. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of a total estimated-KCD assessment from 2002 through 2005 65,936. The amount of the agreement does not match the total estimated assessment due to the fact that the agreement amount is based on the approved grant application submitted in July of this year. The amount requested in the application wasrn-based on the estimated 2005 assessment at the time the application was prepared. Since that time, the estimated 2005 assessment has been revised by KC:D to include an additional $6,000.15. Although the balance of$6,000.15 cannot be used under the 2005 agreement, it will be available for the City to use for future projects covered under a separate grant application and subsequent agreement. Attached is a brief description of projects that are being requested for funding by the district for this year. Also attached is a draft copy of an agreement to allow the transfer of funds from the King Conservation District to the City along with a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. The agreement will be executed when the District approves the specific projects for funding. CONCLUSION: Council aLi�a resoluti n authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with the King Conservation DistriceFcceptititthe City of Renton share of the approved King Conservation District assessment and approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\Issue Paper.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR AWARD OF A NON- COMPETITIVE GRANT. WHEREAS, King Conservation District No. 9 has funds available to it to assist the City of Renton in providing certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has applied for and received a grant to perform such activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions relating to the award of the grant to the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement for award of non-competitive grant to the City of Renton from King Conservation District No. 9. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of Now; 2005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\resolution.doc RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of act, ember, 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 2 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of- Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division/ Surface December 5, 2005 Water Utility Staff Contact...... Ron Straka (ext. 7248) Allen Quynn (ext. 7247) Agenda Status Consent.............. X Subject: Public Hearing.. 2002-2005 King Conservation District Agreement for Correspondence.. Noncompetitive Grants Ordinance............. Resolution............ Old Business........ Exhibits: New Business....... Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Resolution Information......... Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grants Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other............... X Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $0 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... $59,953.85 (requested fund allocation for 2002-2005) Total Project Budget... City Share Total Project... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The King Conservation District (KCD) agreement allows the transfer of the City of Renton's $1.00 per parcel share of the $5.00 per parcel KCD Assessment of parcels within Renton. The grant funding can be used on projects that are approved by KCD such as water quality, habitat enhancement, water and fisheries resource protection projects and programs. The current estimated balance of the grant funding available to the City from 2002 through 2005 is approximately $65,936.00. This includes the yearly accrued assessment from prior years (2002-2004) of $49,178.20 plus the estimated 2005 allocation of$16,757.80. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of the total 2002-2005 estimated assessment to fund the following projects: (1) The City sponsored SW 341h Street Culvert Replacement Project, and (2) the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservation District fund allocation from 2002 to 2005. In addition, staff also requests that the Council approve using a portion ($4,869) of Renton's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\AgenBill-grant funds.doc\AQlp f CITY CLERK DIVISION Send Copies To: Rom$ 3 -78 T Date: CITY ATTORNEY CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES/PARKS EDNSP/ECONOMIC DEVELOP. FINANCE/INFO SERVICES FIRE DEPT/FIRE PREVENTION HEARING EXAMINER HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MGMT HUMAN SERVICES LIBRARIES MAYOR/EXECUTIVE MUNICIPAL COURT PLANNING COMMISSION POLICE CODIFIER NEWSPAPER PARTIES OF RECORD PlanningBuilding/Public Works: ADMINISTRATION GY��9 Z%m AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSPORTATION SERVICES UTILITIES&TECH SERVICES A(f S t�rn S 105/ en (fJc�ynrt e - CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3784 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR AWARD OF A NON- COMPETITIVE GRANT. WHEREAS, King Conservation District No. 9 has funds available to it to assist the City of Renton in providing certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has applied for and received a grant to perform such activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions relating to the award of the grant to the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement for the award of a non-competitive grant to the City of Renton from King Conservation District No. 9. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 5 t h day of December , 2005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk I RESOLUTION NO. 3784 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 5 t h day o f December , 2005. - � Kathy Ke ker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warre City Attorney RE S:1145:I 1/2 3/05:ma 2 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of- Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division/ Surface December 5, 2005 Water Utility Staff Contact...... Ron Straka (ext. 7248) Allen Quynn (ext. 7247) Agenda Status Consent.............. X Subject: Public Hearing.. 2002-2005 King Conservation District Agreement for Correspondence.. Noncompetitive Grants Ordinance............. Resolution............ Old Business........ Exhibits: New Business....... Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Resolution Information......... Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grants Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other............... X Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $0 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... $59,953.85 (requested fund allocation for 2002-2005) Total Project Budget... City Share Total Project... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The King Conservation District(KCD) agreement allows the transfer of the City of Renton's $1.00 per parcel share of the $5.00 per parcel KCD Assessment of parcels within Renton. The grant funding can be used on projects that are approved by KCD such as water quality,habitat enhancement, water and fisheries resource protection projects and programs. The current estimated balance of the grant funding available to the City from 2002 through 2005 is approximately $65,936.00. This includes the yearly accrued assessment from prior years (2002-2004) of $49,178.20 plus the estimated 2005 allocation of$16,757.80. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of the total 2002-2005 estimated assessment to fund the following projects: (1) The City sponsored SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project, and (2)the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department staff recommends that Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservation District fund allocation from 2002 to 2005. In addition, staff also requests that the Council approve using a portion($4,869) of Renton's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\AgenBiII-grant funds.doc\AQlp O� PLANNING/BUILDING/ r; ♦ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 5, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler,,,Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmermak-6idministrator STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor Allen Quynn, Surface Water Engineer SUBJECT: 2002-2005 King Conservation District Agreement for Noncompetitive Grants ISSUE: Should the Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to (1) execute an agreement with the King Conservation District (KCD) to accept the City of Renton annual share of the approved King Conservation District assessment, and(2) approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance? RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department staff recommends that Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservation District fund allocation from 2002 to 2005. In addition, staff also requests that the Council approve using a portion($4,869) of Renton's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The City of Renton became a member of the King Conservation District in March 1992, upon the passage of Resolution No. 2885. At that time, the King County Council approved a $1.25 per parcel assessment against all properties within jurisdictions that are members of the King Conservation District on August 16, 1993. Subsequently, King County Ordinance 12959, approved by the King County Council in December 1997, adopted the Regional Water Quality Committee's recommendation to raise the Conservation District annual assessment from $1.25 per parcel to $5.00 per parcel. The $1.25 per parcel assessment had been in place since the King County Council adopted Ordinance 10981 in Terri Briere December 5,2005 Page 2 of 2 August 1993 and was renewed in 1995 by Ordinance 12095. The ordinances provide that the generated revenues be distributed as follows: • $3.00 distributed equally to each of the five watershed forums • $1.00 per parcel to the County and each city in the District from which the funds were collected • $1.00 per parcel to the District for implementation of its approved work program. The District will either spend the funds in cities by providing services, or will transfer the funding to the cities to be used as financial assistance for stream restoration, fish habitat, and/or water quality projects. Based on the assessment collected in 2004 by the King Conservation District,the annual share available to Renton is approximately$16,393 per year. The grant funds could be used to pay the District for specific additional services or could be transferred to the City for use on eligible projects. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of a total KCD assessment from 2002 through 2005 estimated at $65,936. The amount of the agreement does not match the total estimated assessment due to the fact that the agreement amount is based on the approved grant application submitted in July of this year. The amount requested in the application was based on the estimated 2005 assessment at the time the application was prepared. Since that time, the estimated 2005 assessment has been revised by KCD to include an additional $6,000.15. Although the balance of$6,000.15 cannot be used under the 2005 agreement, it will be available for the City to use for future projects covered under a separate grant application and subsequent agreement. The KCD assessment will be used to fund the City sponsored SW 34`h Street Drainage Improvement Project ($55,084.85) and the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored the Black River Watershed Alliance ($4,869). Both of these projects will help to restore fish habitat as well as improve water quality in the Springbrook Creek Basin. Attached, is a brief description of projects that are being requested for funding by the District for this year. Also attached, is a copy of an agreement to allow the transfer of funds from the King Conservation District to the City along with a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. CONCLUSION: Council approves a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with the King Conservation District to accept the City of Renton share of the approved King Conservation District assessment and approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. HA\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\Issue Paper.docAQIp CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR AWARD OF A NON- COMPETITIVE GRANT. WHEREAS, King Conservation District No. 9 has funds available to it to assist the City of Renton in providing certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has applied for and received a grant to perform such activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions relating to the award of the grant to the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION IL The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement for award of non-competitive grant to the City of Renton from King Conservation District No. 9. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of December, 2005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\resol ution.doc RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of December, 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 2 Project Name: SW 34"'Street Culvert Contact: Allen Quynn Re lacement Project A licant: Ci -of Renton Title: Project Mana er Principal Partners(if any): Address: 1055 S. Grady Way City of Renton Renton, WA 98055 Total Project Cost: $900,000 estimated Phone: 425-430-7247 KCD Fundin Requested: $55,084.85 Fax: 425-430-7247 Project Start Date: A ril 2005 E-mail: a u nn ci.renton.wa.us Project End Date: Fall 2007 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): The purpose of this project is to replace the existing Springbrook Creek culvert crossing of SW 30 Street in Renton, Washington. The crossing consists of 4 existing, undersized corrugated metal(CMP)culverts that will be replaced with a new box culvert. Springbrook Creek is the main drainage channel for the 24-square mile Black River Basin that includes portions of the Cities of Renton, Kent, Tukwila and unincorporated King County. Springbrook Creek drains to the Black River Pump Station where flows are pumped into the Green River(see attached figures 6-1 and 6-2). The fisheries resources within Springbrook Creek include Chinook and Coho salmon, steelhead and cutthroat trout. The existing culverts were constructed in 1980 and are a major restriction of flows that contribute to the flooding problems in portions of the south valley during storm events_ The project consists of the following elements: • Construction of a new box culvert including stream bypass. • Placement of spawning gravel in the bottom of the culvert. • Placement of woody debris on the sides of the channel. • Planting of riparian trees and shrubs along channel bank. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts,provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): The project will accomplish the following objectives: • Eliminate flooding of the SW 34`h Street/Springbrook Creek crossing during the 100-yr storm event. • Lower upstream water levels, which will increase the capacity of local storm systems in Lind Avenue and SW 34d' Street. • Upsizing the SW 34 h Street culvert in conjunction with future pipe system improvements will help the City meet flood protection goals in the valley. • Provide improved fish passage and riparian habitat for salmonid migration. The following provides a brief description of how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.01: "To prepare and keep current a comprehensive long-range program recommending the conservation of all the renewable natural resources of the District. Such King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application programs shall be directed toward the best use of renewable natural resources and in a manner that will best meet the needs of the District and the state, taking into consideration, where appropriate, such uses as farming, grazing,timber supply, forest, parks, outdoor recreation. potable water supplies for urban and rural areas, water for agriculture, minimal flow.and industrial uses, watershed stabilization, control of soil erosion, retardation of water run-off, flood prevention and control, reservoirs and other water storage, restriction of developments of flood plains, protection of open space and scenery, preservation of natural beauty, protection of fish and wildlife, preservation of wilderness areas and wild rivers,the prevention or reduction of sedimentation and other pollution in rivers and other waters, and such location of highways, schools, housing developments, industries,airports and other facilities and structures as will fit the needs of the state and be consistent with the best uses of the renewable natural resources of the state. The program shall include an inventory of all renewable natural resources in the District, a compilation of current resource needs, projections of future resource requirements, priorities for various resource activities, projected timetables, descriptions of available alternatives,and provisions for coordination with other resource programs. Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project meets the above criteria by reducing flooding of SW 34'h Street as well as upstream storm systems that discharge to Springbrook Creek. The new culvert will be designed to prevent flooding of the SW 34'h Street crossing during the 100-yr storm event and lower tail water conditions for outfalls discharging upstream. The project will also help protect fish by lowering stream velocities during storm events through the new culvert to facilitate fish passage. KCD Strategic Plan Initiate This proposal meets the strategic plan element 2,d(111)Support for Regional Conservation Initiatives, which states: "The District will join in regional conservation initiatives, lending its leadership and expertise on issues such as major river flooding,preserving and restoring fish habitat,protecting and restoring water quality in watersheds and general public conservation education programs in the region". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is one element of a series of projects recommended in the City of Renton's 1997 East Side Green River Watershed Plan and EIS (ESGRWP),which was a basin wide planning level study to identify projects that would help reduce the flooding in the Renton valley area_ The ESGRWP identified the replacement of the SW 34'h Street crossing of Springbrook Creek to reduce upstream water levels and improve fish passage. As discussed under the previous criteria,the proposed project will eliminate flooding of SW 34'h Street during the 100-yr storm as well as reduce flooding in local storm systems upstream that discharge to the creek. The project will also improve water quality and provide wildlife habitat with the addition of riparian plantings such as native shrubs and trees along the channel bank. In-stream woody debris will also be added to provide fish rearing and refuge habitat. Springbrook Creek is within Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA)9. The draft WR1A 9 Salmon Habitat Plan identifies the need for improving fish passage riparian habitat and water quality to benefit Chinook salmon and other salmonids. H_1File Sys1.SWA-Surface Water Section AdministrationtS WA 11-Interagency CooperationTing Conservation DistricA2002-2005 KCD Grants11003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doclAQtp King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Regional Funding Principles Established by the Kiqg County Regional Task Force The project satisfies regional task force funding principles criteria 3,1(10, which states: "Habitat restoration which enhances ecological significant fish runs". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is located on Springbrook Creek, which historically has poor water quality, particularly low dissolved oxygen due to high water temperatures. The basin,especially the valley floor has become highly urbanized with large commercial and industrial areas that directly discharge to Springbrook Creek. This project will address water quality by planting plants and trees along the channel bank that will help provide shade and help cool the creek during the summer months. Woody debris will also be incorporated into the project to provide channel rearing and refuge habitat for salmon. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Project activities include the following: • Replace existing undersized culverts with a new box culvert to increase conveyance capacity and reduce flooding of SW 30 Street and upstream storm pipe systems. • Construct stream bypass during provide dewatering of groundwater during construction. • Relocate utilities. • Provide a more natural and better-lined streambed to enhance fish passage. This includes adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert. • Provide riparian habitat planting including a mix of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Measurable Results include: • After project construction, observe lower water surface elevations in the channel upstream of SW 34'"Street during high flow events. • A year after construction complete, observe the establishment of native riparian plants in areas planted as part of project restoration. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Total Ci t r of Renton Salaries and Benefits Travel/Meals/Mileage Office/Field Supplies Contracted/Professional $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 Services Land Ac uisition Permits Other TOTAL $55,084.85 $844,915-15 $900,000 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\S WA I I-Interagency CooperationWing Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City CorrespondencelCity KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Funding will be acknowledged, reported and tracked using the State of Washington Accounting and Reporting System or"BARS". The use of taxpayer funds provided through the King Conservation District for the above-described projects will be acknowledged through newspaper articles, websites or other information released during project implementation. Attachments Gregg Zi rinan Date PBPW Ad "str nor H:\Fife.Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I]-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District12002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City CorrespondenceWity KCD grant application.docWQtp King Conservation District 1 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Fn Name: Black River Channel Native Contact: Doris Yepez estoration Project nt: Doris Yepez Title: Project Coordinator Fiscal Agent: Seattle Audubon Society Fiscal Agent: Duwamish TriTRe al Partners(if any): 444 SE 135`h St. enton 98059 of Black River Forever Duwamish Tribe Total Project Cost: $53,559.00891-0730 KCD Funding Requested: $4,869.00 Fax: 425 917-0872 Project Start Date: 9/29/2004 E-mail: dorisdandelion ahoo.com Project End Date: Spring 2008 1. Brief Project Description(—200 words): There are two phases to the Black River Channel Restoration Project,Phase I and Phase 2,and the funding requested covers both Phases. The goals for both Phases are to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, and develop community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. Phase 1 began September 29,2004,and concludes in Spring 2007 with a commitment to maintain and monitor the restoration site for two years. The restoration area for Phase 1 is.83 of an acre in size and located on the south bank of the Black River Channel, off of Monster Road SW, adjacent and immediately downstream from the DNRP Black River Pump Station and upstream from the Monster Road Bridge. Much of the work has been completed to date and included: 1. The removal of invasive plants on the top 20 ft.of the riverbank and in the adjoining field. 2. The removal of 11 ecology blocks left on the property. 3. Scarification of the soil to loosen the gravelly soil on half of the field area. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger. 5. Soil amendments. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs. 7. Installation of a drip irrigation system to increase the survival rate of the newly planted native vegetation. What remains is the monitoring and maintenance of the restoration site for the two year committed period. Phase 2 will begin in Fall 2005 and will conclude Spring 2008. Phase 2 is on the south bank as well, but immediately upstream from, and adjacent to, the DNRP Black River Pump Station. The restoration area is approximately%acre in size. As in Phase 1,the goal is to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, as well as expand community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. The new site will also be monitored and maintained for two years. 2. Project Objectives(Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts,provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency CooperationlKing Conservation District12002-2005 KCD GrantsU 003 City Correspondence0oris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The project objectives are: • Provide shade, food sources and habitat improvements for the fish and wildlife through the removal of invasive weeds and the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs. • Acquaint the community and students with the Black River. • Educate the community and students about the Black River Channel Restoration Project and the Black River watershed, forest and channel ecosystem. • Involve the community and students in the restoration work. The following provides a brief description of specifically how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.450: "Watershed restoration projects—Intent. The legislature.declares that it is the goal of the state of Washington to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular, fish and wildlife and their habitat. It is further the policy of the state insofar as possible to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals." Description of how this project meets the first part of the criteria"to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular, fish and wildlife and their habitat": This project restores the riparian habitat along the Black River Channel and adjoining field,and improves the fish and wildlife habitat. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs restores the area to its more natural state. In addition,the native trees planted along the riverbank will provide shade that will keep the temperatures of the water at a more desirable level for salmonids. The debris from the trees and shrubs, leaves falling, will also provide a source of food for the fish; and fallen trees will act as LWD,(Large Woody Debris), which give salmon areas to rest and spawn.The field area, with the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs, will provide a buffer from the noise and pollution of the street, as well as provide a diversity of food sources for the other wildlife,producing berries and flowers at different times of year. Also,once grown in, the vegetation will provide more habitat areas for the wildlife. Description of how this project meets the second part of the criteria"to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals": During Phase 1,there were four community events: one day for planting, two others for mulching and weeding, and the last was the installation of the drip irrigation system.Numerous groups helped with these tasks including Renton Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, Campfire Girls,Herons Forever members,Friends of Black River, Duwamish tribal members, Sierra Club members,Boeing volunteers and the Briarwood Student Leadership Group. The same volunteer organizations will be asked to help with Phase 2 in order to increase the groups' sense of connection and commitment to the Black River and to give them the opportunity to see the growth and progress made through their participation in the restoration tasks during Phase 1. KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria As stated in the KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria, Section b ii):"Promoting Natural Habitat Restoration. The District will provide information and assistance to landowners, businesses, and other H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1 I-Interagency CooperationTing Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant appfication3.doc King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application citizens in rural and urban areas on the preservation and restoration of natural habitats including the creation of low-maintenance native plant habitats that conserve water and are friendly to wildlife, eco- landscaping, establishing naturescaping demonstration sites, intrusive species management and community stewardship". Description of how this project meets this criteria: The restoration work included, in Phase 1, the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field area,as well as the removal of other invasive shrubs such as the Butterfly bush. Maintenance of the restoration site includes weeding, specifically focusing on removing the new growth of Himalayan blackberries and Butterfly bush, and removing other weeds on the site that are on the Washington State and/or King County Noxious Weed List, namely, Tansy ragwort, Bull thistle and Oxeye daisy. Other invasive weeds will be removed as needed. Phase 2 also calls for the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field areas, and the removal of other noxious weeds present, which include Japanese knotweed. During Phase 1,community stewardship has been developed through the involvement of the different volunteer organizations in the restoration tasks and in the presentation of the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to four different groups. As stated in the KCD Strategic Initiative Section d, 1): "Population Growth and Increased Urbanization. The District will actively promote workable solutions that help minimize the effects of population growth and increased urbanization on the natural environment." Description of how this project meets these criteria: When the planted native trees get larger,they will create a dense wooded area, a small forest, in a highly urbanized setting. The planting of trees in urban areas is very beneficial to the environment. Trees absorb contaminants,control erosion,reduce storm- water run-off by absorbing water through their roots, clean the air, and as stated above, are beneficial to the fish and wildlife by providing more shade, additional food sources and habitat. The trees, with the falling of large wooded debris,also enhance our stream systems. The grassy, field area that was part of the restoration site in Phase 1 was under laid with gravel to accommodate the trucks when the Black River Pump Station was built. One of the restoration tasks, during Phase 1, included ripping up the gravelly field and planting native trees, shrubs and forbs. Mulch was also added throughout the field area.The addition of mulch,and the decomposition of native vegetation in the future, will enrich the soil and help rebuild it. KCD Regional Funding Principles As stated in the#3 KCD Regional Funding Principles, iv), "Water quality and watershed restoration and protection support services such as coordination of monitoring(data collection,studies, evaluation)and public education programs". Description of how this project meets this criterion: During Phase 2, community involvement will expand to include the Renton schools and other local schools. Presently, there are two Renton schools, Lindbergh High School and Black River High School, which have provided written commitments to involve their students in hands-on learning at the Black River,as well as introducing a Black River component into their science curriculum. The Black River Riparian Forest, Channel and restoration areas will be used as a living laboratory for students to learn about scientific methods and concepts and to learn about the Black River and its components. H:\FileSys\SWA-Surface Water Section AdministrationlSWA It-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\]003 City CorrespondenceOoris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The Black River Restoration Project will also be included as an option in a tour sponsored by the King County Waste Treatment program, Wheels to Water. A visit to the South Treatment Plant will include a tour of the Black River and the opportunity to participate in restoration tasks or learn about the history and components of the Black River through a walking tour of the Forest, Channel and restoration sites. In addition to the above,the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation shown to different groups during Phase 1, helped educate the public about the restoration work and the Black River. The PowerPoint presentations will also be shown to new groups participating in Phase 2. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Phase 1: I. Removal of invasive weeds: Himalayan blackberries were rampant on the riverbank and on a small vegetation island in the middle of the field. There were a few other invasives such as the Butterfly bush, but the Himalayan blackberry was the predominant invasive weed with a 50- 60%ground cover on the riverbank and a 35% ground cover on the island. Most of the invasive blackberries on the restoration site have been eradicated through the cutting and grubbing of the blackberries. Earthcorps was hired to cut and grub the blackberries on the top 20 ft. of the bank. Volunteers and salaried crew have removed the remainder of the blackberries on the island,and have been tackling the new growth of the Himalayan blackberry that is popping up throughout the site. A salaried person has also been cutting blackberries on the lower part of the bank, beyond the 20 ft_, and throughout the site. 2. Removal of ecology blocks: There were 11 ecology blocks on the site before the project began. These have all been removed with the help of King County roads crew. 3. Ripping up of the gravelly field: Before the restoration work,the entire field area was grown over with grass and under laid with gravel that was deposited when the Black River Pump Station was built. It was almost impossible to dig into the field to plant native vegetation since the ground was so compacted. Half of the gravelly field was ripped up with the use of a backhoe,to allow for planting, and now the soil is looser. Thrushes were observed,on at least two different occasions,pecking at the soil since it has been loosened. The backhoe also removed the other invasive shrubs that were in the island. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger: In the other half of the gravelly field,20 rows of planting holes were dug with an auger. The field area is being used as a test site to see which side produces better results, the augured field area or the area where the backhoe ripped up the gravel and grass. 5. Soil amendments: Approximately 60 cubic yards of mulch was spread throughout the field area of the restoration site beginning January 2005 through May 2005. The mulch helps with weed control; helps keep some moisture close to the newly planted native vegetation, and will enhance the soil as it decays. The soil in the field area is nutrient poor, and some plants are in need of fertilizer. Biosolids are in the process of being purchased from the South Waste Treatment Plant to place around the plants that need some fertilizing. 6. The planting of 613 native trees,shrubs and forbs: Most of the native plants were planted in January 2005. Some were planted in February 2005, and approximately 10 more were donated and planted in May 2005. There has been less than a 2%mortality rate,and those were mostly the Pacific madrones, which have the reputation of being difficult to plant. 7. Installation of the drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system was installed in April 2005. A drip system is crucial at this site,especially in the field area, since the soil is very well-drained and does not retain water.A few of the native plants had yellowed a little with the early heat spell in February/March, but once the drip irrigation system was running,the plants regained their healthy, green look. The drip irrigation system is attached to the faucet at the Pump Station HAFile Sys1SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants11003 City CorrespondencelDoris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 5 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application and is turned on at least 4 times a week by the Pump Station crew, and occasionally on hot and dry weekends, by the restoration project coordinator. 8. Community involvement: The community has shown interest and support,evidenced with the large numbers of participants. For two of the community activity days, there were over 50 volunteers helping on each of those days. 9. Monitoring and maintenance: The project is being monitored and maintained at least twice a month. Partners to the grant, Herons Forever and Friends of Black River members, are helping with the maintenance and monitoring_ Monitoring includes tracking the condition of the native vegetation, the growth of the invasive weeds, checking the drip irrigation system and noting any wildlife in the area. Maintenance includes protecting the native vegetation from being eaten, if necessary; removing the invasive weeds by either weed whacking,or manually cutting then grubbing, as in the case of the blackberries; replacing dead native vegetation and repairing, if necessary, the drip irrigation system. Monitoring and maintenance is very important in helping the native plants thrive as well as ensuring that they will not be out competed by the invasive weeds or eaten by wildlife. The project activities and measurable results for Phase 2 include: 1. Planning and organizing: A Scope of Work Budget for King County needs to be completed before December 2005_ Dates for the different restoration tasks need to be set, vendors need to be contacted, materials need to be purchased, subcontractors need to be lined up, requests for payments and other paperwork need to be submitted to King County throughout the project. Other grant paperwork needs to be completed including a report to KCD. Reports are submitted to partners on a regular basis. Media will be solicited for the various community events. Planning and organizing is critical for the project to run smoothly and to get the needed tasks done. 2. Contacting different volunteer organizations: Different volunteer organizations will be contacted to help with the native planting,mulching and installation of the drip irrigation system. Involving the community will develop community stewardship of the Black River. We will attempt to involve the same organizations as last year, to strengthen community stewardship, and contact new groups as well. The new groups will be shown the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to acquaint them with the Black River and to build some desire and enthusiasm to help with the restoration tasks. 3. Contacting Lindbergh and Black River High Schools to set up dates for student participation in the restoration project and discuss the specifics of the addition of the Black River into the science curriculum. 4. Developing a tour schedule with the Wheels to Water Program and writing up an oral presentation for the tour. 5. Removing invasive weeds: The invasive weeds account for at least 90%of the present groundcover, and most of the weeds are Himalayan blackberry. The weeds need to be removed in order to plant native vegetation.The roots of the weeds will be removed to inhibit the return growth of the weeds. The abundant Himalayan blackberries create a monoculture with a food source that has limited value since it is not eaten by much of the wildlife. 6. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs: Approximately 500 trees, shrubs and forbs will be planted with numerous species of each.Native vegetation will enhance the area by providing food sources, shade and habitat for the wildlife; and a diversity of native vegetation will provide a variety of food and habitat sources.Native trees will also control erosion, storm-water run-off, clean the air and absorb contaminants in the soil. 7. Soil amendments: Mulch will be added around the areas where the native vegetation is planted. Mulch will help retain the moisture in the soil, control weeds as well as enrich the soil as it decays. A natural fertilizer, such as biosolids,will be added as necessary. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA It-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District12002-2005 KCD GrantsU 003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3_doc King Conservation District 6 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 8. Installing a drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system will keep the native vegetation hydrated and increase their chance of survival. Watering is critical especially during the area's dry summer months. 9. Maintenance and monitoring of the restoration site: Monitoring includes checking and recording the condition of the native plants, the drip irrigation system, the growth of the invasive weeds and wildlife activity. Maintenance involves repairing the drip irrigation system, removing the growing weeds, replacing dead native plants and protecting the native plants from being eaten by wildlife. Frequent maintenance and monitoring will help keep the invasive growth from getting out of control and help insure the successful growth of the native vegetation as well as catch any other problems that come up. 4. Budget Expenses Budget=ItemKCDFunds Other Funds Other Total King County Funds Waterworks (specify) Grant Salaries and Benefits $1,034 $14,000 $15,034 Travel/Meals/Mileage $253 $2,043 $2,296 Office/Field Supplies $3,489 $12,728 $16,217 Contracted/Professional $15,138 $15,138 Services Land Acquisition Permits $93 97 190 Other(Fiscal Agents) $4,684 $4,684 TOTAL $4,869 $48,690 IS53,559 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. The KCD contribution will be noted on the signs that will be placed at the two restoration sites upon the termination of the project. King County has been advised that KCD funds will potentially be the source of the cash match for the project for both phases. Any newspaper articles or photos will acknowledge KCD as a contributor to the project. KCD will be acknowledged as a contributor and partner in the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation. KCD will also be mentioned and acknowledged in other correspondence related to the project. � Z regg Zi r n, P. Date PBPW Ad trator HAFi1e Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency CooperatioMKing Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application1doc REN TON t51pTHERS o r I; ?�: I r SHOPPING 1 ` ^ CENTER s; MORRIS AV$ CBOT /4~ RD S AV 4)86 WRIT N �, RAILING HILLS CREEK Rpm �A�8�1 's a SHAiTUCK t T...SNATTUCK C ' N N TALBOT WETIANO VALLEY PANTHER CREEK Q�j '�` GENERAL f11 : _J HOSPITAL .�V �;,+ ,�\ \ tit I � ��•� ?it _ _ .__. ._--._ -"_ �YAllBY F'R�Y __-- ..�:J-._� _ •�/ t I`_ ��� _ 1 36'z18'BOX - 60' SR 167 36' E VALLEY RD 8' E __ 1 t .. �a.,.u,..%�f.`� f .� i ,t :: `,r VALLEY -- - - `- - t•::ti.. IN rn I RU ft I' t / _. 41, ........ P Pg- LIND 14 SW 34 SereePCulSENECA ve n: S I i v+, �• Re lacem n ro'ect 3i II f." X. jig - vi Y 3 1 I k SCALE 1'=1000' ,; i _..— _. --.i+'� ' i• _�..� w j 1; h)} n+oAlas A v Q•i i i % POWELL AV SW CONNECTING i .4 o+i CHANNEL PROD CT ; v+ I (COMPLETED 1995) 54- — �Npl LEGEND OAKESD ALE AV SW --''- �- , VALLEY AREA V. L (STUDY AREA) —36" 36" DIAMETER STORM DRAIN STREAM DRAINAGE CHANNEL �\ >—< CULVERT(S) j V.`___LaCK50N SW PUMP STATION \ l\ J FLOOD WATER __..__;; __- � .' J STORAGE POND -- RR— - - rt 'C^�TUK �_ -1 r.1. �K i ,"'` -- — --- -- RENTON CITY LIMITS "s BLACk\ .ice -- ---- — ------ ---- --—_-- = EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER RR WATERSHED RSH PROJECT RIVER �•�:.'> �' �,_ ^\ ' ^J',_. — - WE TS �E '— PUMP _ _ _ § STATION \, i ,.:.. �.� � .-L--- -'^. 1 V �- E 6 RENTON VALLEY AREA Y EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM ! TO GREEN-DUWAMISH RIVER s Black River King County East Side en River Water Quality ���� Watershedundary Management Plan t Study Area —tir Panther Lake 405 i r LKing Count Garrison j Renton I Renton, Creek I 1 Ln i J King County r-� Valley Area —Sp E._._._..r L.—•_,_.i L�•1 r 167 Kent rj Springbrook Creek v East Valley Road v 3 Springbrook 1 vi Renton Creek Mill 1 i ukwlla C,. 167 Black River i i een Ker)t j Pump Station • � 181 —•---•—•—•—.— Tukwila j w 181 I i N f -•, i M Tukwila N Kent `'.-.J 1 Kent r.."'."` l.�✓ Lagoons -7 r C j 1 I-5 EAST SIDE GREEN RNER `•—•_._.J Oi 3000 6000 > WATERSHED PROJECT ' APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET FIGURE 6-1 S \ a PROJECT AREA i AGREEMENT FOR AWARD OF NONCOMPETITIVE GRANT Black River Watershed Alliance This Agreement is made between the King Conservation District Number 9, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 935 Powell Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 (referred to herein as "District"), and the Black River Watershed Alliance, a non-profit organization in King County, Washington, located at 16444 SE 135 h Street, Renton Washington 98059 (referred to herein as"Recipient'), for the purposes set forth herein. SECTION 1. RECITALS 1.1 Whereas, the District is a special purpose district organized and existing under authority of Chapter 89.08 RCW. The District engages in and provides certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and 1.2 Whereas, on December 15, 2000, the Metropolitan King County Council enacted King County Ordinance No. 14016 which, among other things,provides for the distribution of noncompetitive grant funds from a portion of the special assessments imposed by King County Ordinance No. 14016 and collected by the District pursuant to Chapter 89.08 RCW; and 1.3 Whereas, on November 19, 1998, the District adopted Resolution No. 98-20 relating to the policy and procedures governing the District's award of any noncompetitive grants authorized by King County, and 1.4 Whereas, the District has reviewed the grant application submitted by Recipient and has determined that the application meets the requirements of Chapter 89.08 RCW and the District's policy and procedures for awarding noncompetitive grants; and 1.5 Whereas, the District and Recipient desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of establishing the terms and conditions relating to the District's award of a noncompetitive grant to Recipient. SECTION 2. AGREEMENT 2.1 The District agrees to award Recipient a grant in the total amount of Four thousand eight-hundred sixty-nine Dollars ($4,869) from 2002 Assessments. Grant funds shall be used by Recipient solely for the performance of the work described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Grant funds from 2002 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient within five(5) business days after District's receipt of a fully executed Agreement. 2.2 Recipient represents and warrants that it will only use the grant funds for the work described in Exhibit A, which may be amended by the parties pursuant to Paragraph 3.3 of the - 1 - Agreement. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized work. Further, Recipient agrees to return to the District any grant funds that are not expended and/or remain after completion of the work covered by this Agreement. 2.3 Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the grant funds may only be expended on work which shall be entirely within the District's jurisdictional boundaries. The following municipal entities are not within the District's jurisdictional boundaries: Enumclaw, Federal Way, Milton,Pacific, and Skykomish. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for work performed outside the District's jurisdictional boundaries. 2.4 In the event the scope of work authorized by this Agreement includes the use of grant funds to purchase houses located on real property within a flood hazard area, Recipient acknowledges and agrees that grant funds may only be used for such purposes if the houses to be purchased were constructed before floodplain mapping or sensitive areas regulations were in place for that area. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized purposes. 2.5 Recipient shall be required to provide the District with biannual financial and project progress reports,along with an annual summary report. Financial and project reports shall be due May 31 and November 30 each year. The Recipient shall also be required to submit to the District a final report which documents the Recipient's completion of the work in conformance with this Agreement within thirty(30) days after the completion of the work. The final report shall, among other things, summarize the project's successes and shall address the regional benefits accomplished by the work. The final report shall also identify any obstacles or challenges which were encountered during the work, along with general recommendations regarding ways to avoid such obstacles or challenges in the future. If requested, Recipient agrees to provide the District with additional financial or progress reports from time to time, at reasonable intervals. 2.6 Recipient's expenditures of grant funds shall be separately identified in the Recipient's accounting records. If requested, Recipient shall comply with other reasonable requests made by the District with respect to the manner in which project expenditures.are tracked and accounted for in Recipient's accounting books and records. Recipient shall maintain such records of expenditures as may be necessary to conform to generally accepted accounting principals and to meet the requirements of all applicable state and federal laws. 2.7 Recipient shall be required to track project expenses using the Budget Accounting and Reporting System for the State of Washington("BARS"). 2.8 The District or its representative shall have the right from time to time, at reasonable intervals, to audit the Recipient's books and records in order to verify compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Recipient shall cooperate with the District in any such audit. 2.9 Recipient shall retain all accounting records and project files relating to this Agreement in accordance with criteria established in the Revised Code of Washington and the Washington State Archivist. - 2 - 2.10 Recipient shall ensure that all work performed by Recipient or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors is performed in a manner which protects and safeguards the environment and natural resources and which is in compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations. Recipient shall implement an appropriate monitoring system or program to ensure compliance with this provision. 2.11 Recipient agrees that in the event a court of competent jurisdiction finds that the imposition or collection of the special assessments authorized by King County Ordinance No. 14016 are unlawful and orders the repayment of such assessments, Recipient agrees to reimburse the District for the full amount of the grant award, including any interest which may be awarded by the court. 2.12 Recipient agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, its agents, officers, officials and employees from all claims, alleged liability, damages, losses to or death of person or damage to property allegedly resulting from the acts of the Recipient or any of its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. 2.13 Recipient agrees to acknowledge the District as a source of funding for this project on all literature, signage or press releases related to said project. SECTION 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 3.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No prior or contemporaneous representation, inducement,promise or agreement between or among the parties which relate to the subject matter hereof which are not embodied in this Agreement shall be of any force or effect. 3.3 No amendment to this Agreement shall be binding on any of the parties to this Agreement unless such amendment is in writing and is executed by the parties. The parties contemplate that this Agreement may from time to time be modified by written amendment which shall be executed by duly authorized representatives of the parties and attached to this Agreement. 3.4 Each party warrants and represents that such party has full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement and each person executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents that he/she has been fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and that such party is bound by the signature of such representative. 3.5 Expenditure of grant funds shall be subject to appropriation by the Metropolitan King County Council. - 3 - DISTRICT: RECIPIENT: By By Name Name Title Title Date Date Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form: DISTRICT LEGAL COUNSEL: RECIPIENT'S ATTORNEY: By (z( - c-Imwif BY Name C �—f t'rn o dT Name Date—id �� Q S Date -4 - Exhibit A King Conservation District 1 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Project Name: Black River Channel Native Contact: Doris Yepez Plant Restoration Project Applicant: Doris Yepez Title: Project Coordinator Phase 1 Fiscal Agent: Seattle Audubon Society Phase 2 Fiscal Agent: Principal Partners (if any): Address: 16444 SE 135`"St. City of Renton Renton,WA 98059 Friends of Black River Herons Forever Duwamish Tribe Total Project Cost: $53,559.00 Phone: 425 891-0730 KCD Funding Requested: $4,869.00 Fax: 425 917-0872 Project Start Date: 9/29/2004 E-mail: dorisdandelion@yahoo.com Project End Date: Spring 2008 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): There are two phases to the Black River Channel Restoration Project, Phase 1 and Phase 2,and the funding requested covers both Phases. The goals for both Phases are to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, and develop community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. Phase 1 began September 29, 2004, and concludes in Spring 2007 with a commitment to maintain and monitor the restoration site for two years. The restoration area for Phase 1 is .83 of an acre in size and located on the south bank of the Black River Channel, off of Monster Road SW, adjacent and immediately downstream from the DNRP Black River Pump Station and upstream from the Monster Road Bridge. Much of the work has been completed to date and included: 1. The removal of invasive plants on the top 20 ft. of the riverbank and in the adjoining field. 2. The removal of 11 ecology blocks left on the property. 3. Scarification of the soil to loosen the gravelly soil on half of the field area. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger. 5. Soil amendments. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs. 7. Installation of a drip irrigation system to increase the survival rate of the newly planted native vegetation. What remains is the monitoring and maintenance of the restoration site for the two year committed period. Phase 2 will begin in Fall 2005 and will conclude Spring 2008. Phase 2 is on the south bank as well, but immediately upstream from,and adjacent to,the DNRP Black River Pump Station. The restoration area is approximately''/z acre in size. As in Phase 1,the goal is to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, as well as expand community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. The new site will also be monitored and maintained for two years. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts, provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperafion\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The project objectives are: • Provide shade, food sources and habitat improvements for the fish and wildlife through the removal of invasive weeds and the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs. • Acquaint the community and students with the Black River. • Educate the community and students about the Black River Channel Restoration Project and the Black River watershed, forest and channel ecosystem. • Involve the community and students in the restoration work. The following provides a brief description of specifically how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.450: "Watershed restoration projects--Intent. The legislature declares that it is the goal of the state of Washington to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular,fish and wildlife and their habitat. It is further the policy of the state insofar as possible to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals." Description of how this project meets the first part of the criteria "to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular,fish and wildlife and their habitat": This project restores the riparian habitat along the Black River Channel and adjoining field,and improves the fish and wildlife habitat. Planting native trees,shrubs and forbs restores the area to its more natural state. In addition,the native trees planted along the riverbank will provide shade that will keep the temperatures of the water at a more desirable level for salmonids. The debris from the trees and shrubs, leaves falling, will also provide a source of food for the fish; and fallen trees will act as LWD, (Large Woody Debris), which give salmon areas to rest and spawn. The field area, with the planting of native trees,shrubs and forbs, will provide a buffer from the noise and pollution of the street, as well as provide a diversity of food sources for the other wildlife, producing berries and flowers at different times of year. Also, once grown in,the vegetation will provide more habitat areas for the wildlife. Description of how this project meets the second part of the criteria"to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals": During Phase 1, there were four community events: one day for planting, two others for mulching and weeding, and the last was the installation of the drip irrigation system.Numerous groups helped with these tasks including Renton Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, Campfire Girls,Herons Forever members,Friends of Black River, Duwamish tribal members, Sierra Club members,Boeing volunteers and the Briarwood Student Leadership Group. The same volunteer organizations will be asked to help with Phase 2 in order to increase the groups' sense of connection and commitment to the Black River and to give them the opportunity to see the growth and progress made through their participation in the restoration tasks during Phase 1. KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria As stated in the KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria, Section b ii): "Promoting Natural Habitat Restoration. The District will provide information and assistance to landowners,businesses,and other HAFi1e Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application citizens in rural and urban areas on the preservation and restoration of natural habitats including the creation of low-maintenance native plant habitats that conserve water and are friendly to wildlife, eco- landscaping, establishing naturescaping demonstration sites, intrusive species management and community stewardship". Description of how this project meets this criteria: The restoration work included, in Phase 1, the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field area, as well as the removal of other invasive shrubs such as the Butterfly bush. Maintenance of the restoration site includes weeding, specifically focusing on removing the new growth of Himalayan blackberries and Butterfly bush, and removing other weeds on the site that are on the Washington State and/or King County Noxious Weed List, namely, Tansy ragwort, Bull thistle and Oxeye daisy. Other invasive weeds will be removed as needed. Phase 2 also calls for the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field areas, and the removal of other noxious weeds present, which include Japanese knotweed. During Phase 1, community stewardship has been developed through the involvement of the different volunteer organizations in the restoration tasks and in the presentation of the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to four different groups. As stated in the KCD Strategic Initiative Section d, i): "Population Growth and Increased Urbanization. The District will actively promote workable solutions that help minimize the effects of population growth and increased urbanization on the natural environment." Description of how this project meets these criteria: When the planted native trees get larger,they will create a dense wooded area, a small forest, in a highly urbanized setting. The planting of trees in urban areas is very beneficial to the environment. Trees absorb contaminants, control erosion, reduce storm- water run-off by absorbing water through their roots, clean the air, and as stated above,are beneficial to the fish and wildlife by providing more shade, additional food sources and habitat. The trees,with the falling of large wooded debris, also enhance our stream systems. The grassy, field area that was part of the restoration site in Phase 1 was under laid with gravel to accommodate the trucks when the Black River Pump Station was built. One of the restoration tasks, during Phase 1, included ripping up the gravelly field and planting native trees, shrubs and forbs. Mulch was also added throughout the field area. The addition of mulch, and the decomposition of native vegetation in the future, will enrich the soil and help rebuild it. KCD Regional Funding Principles As stated in the#3 KCD Regional Funding Principles, iv), "Water quality and watershed restoration and protection support services such as coordination of monitoring(data collection, studies, evaluation) and public education programs". Description of how this project meets this criterion: During Phase 2, community involvement will expand to include the Renton schools and other local schools. Presently, there are two Renton schools,Lindbergh High School and Black River High School,which have provided written commitments to involve their students in hands-on learning at the Black River, as well as introducing a Black River component into their science curriculum. The Black River Riparian Forest,Channel and restoration areas will be used as a living laboratory for students to learn about scientific methods and concepts and to learn about the Black River and its components. HAFile Sys\.SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\]003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The Black River Restoration Project will also be included as an option in a tour sponsored by the King County Waste Treatment program, Wheels to Water. A visit to the South Treatment Plant will include a tour of the Black River and the opportunity to participate in restoration tasks or learn about the history and components of the Black River through a walking tour of the Forest, Channel and restoration sites. In addition to the above, the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation shown to different groups during Phase 1, helped educate the public about the restoration work and the Black River. The PowerPoint presentations will also be shown to new groups participating in Phase 2. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Phase 1: 1. Removal of invasive weeds: Himalayan blackberries were rampant on the riverbank and on a small vegetation island in the middle of the field. There were a few other invasives such as the Butterfly bush, but the Himalayan blackberry was the predominant invasive weed with a 50- 60%ground cover on the riverbank and a 35%ground cover on the island. Most of the invasive blackberries on the restoration site have been eradicated through the cutting and grubbing of the blackberries. Earthcorps was hired to cut and grub the blackberries on the top 20 ft. of the bank. Volunteers and salaried crew have removed the remainder of the blackberries on the island,and have been tackling the new growth of the Himalayan blackberry that is popping up throughout the site. A salaried person has also been cutting blackberries on the lower part of the bank, beyond the 20 ft.,and throughout the site. 2. Removal of ecology blocks: There were 11 ecology blocks on the site before the project began. These have all been removed with the help of King County roads crew. 3. Ripping up of the gravelly field: Before the restoration work, the entire field area was grown over with grass and under laid with gravel that was deposited when the Black River Pump Station was built. It was almost impossible to dig into the field to plant native vegetation since the ground was so compacted. Half of the gravelly field was ripped up with the use of a backhoe,to allow for planting, and now the soil is looser. Thrushes were observed, on at least two different occasions, pecking at the soil since it has been loosened.The backhoe also removed the other invasive shrubs that were in the island. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger: In the other half of the gravelly field,20 rows of planting holes were dug with an auger. The field area is being used as a test site to see which side produces better results, the augured field area or the area where the backhoe ripped up the gravel and grass. S. Soil amendments: Approximately 60 cubic yards of mulch was spread throughout the field area of the restoration site beginning January 2005 through May 2005. The mulch helps with weed control; helps keep some moisture close to the newly planted native vegetation, and will enhance the soil as it decays. The soil in the field area is nutrient poor, and some plants are in need of fertilizer. Biosolids are in the process of being purchased from the South Waste Treatment Plant to place around the plants that need some fertilizing. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs: Most of the native plants were planted in January 2005. Some were planted in February 2005, and approximately 10 more were donated and planted in May 2005. There has been less than a 2%mortality rate,and those were mostly the Pacific madrones, which have the reputation of being difficult to plant. 7. Installation of the drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system was installed in April 2005. A drip system is crucial at this site,especially in the field area, since the soil is very well-drained and does not retain water. A few of the native plants had yellowed a little with the early heat spell in February/March, but once the drip irrigation system was running,the plants regained their healthy, green look. The drip irrigation system is attached to the faucet at the Pump Station HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 5 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application and is turned on at least 4 times a week by the Pump Station crew,and occasionally on hot and dry weekends, by the restoration project coordinator. 8. Community involvement: The community has shown interest and support, evidenced with the large numbers of participants. For two of the community activity days,there were over 50 volunteers helping on each of those days. 9. Monitoring and maintenance: The project is being monitored and maintained at least twice a month. Partners to the grant, Herons Forever and Friends of Black River members, are helping with the maintenance and monitoring. Monitoring includes tracking the condition of the native vegetation,the growth of the invasive weeds,checking the drip irrigation system and noting any wildlife in the area. Maintenance includes protecting the native vegetation from being eaten, if necessary; removing the invasive weeds by either weed whacking,or manually cutting then grubbing, as in the case of the blackberries; replacing dead native vegetation and repairing, if necessary, the drip irrigation system. Monitoring and maintenance is very important in helping the native plants thrive as well as ensuring that they will not be out competed by the invasive weeds or eaten by wildlife. The project activities and measurable results for Phase 2 include: 1. Planning and organizing: A Scope of Work Budget for King County needs to be completed before December 2005. Dates for the different restoration tasks need to be set,vendors need to be contacted, materials need to be purchased, subcontractors need to be lined up, requests for payments and other paperwork need to be submitted to King County throughout the project. Other grant paperwork needs to be completed including a report to KCD. Reports are submitted to partners on a regular basis. Media will be solicited for the various community events. Planning and organizing is critical for the project to run smoothly and to get the needed tasks done. 2. Contacting different volunteer organizations: Different volunteer organizations will be contacted to help with the native planting, mulching and installation of the drip irrigation system.Involving the community will develop community stewardship of the Black River. We will attempt to involve the same organizations as last year,to strengthen community stewardship, and contact new groups as well. The new groups will be shown the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to acquaint them with the Black River and to build some desire and enthusiasm to help with the restoration tasks. 3. Contacting Lindbergh and Black River High Schools to set up dates for student participation in the restoration project and discuss the specifics of the addition of the Black River into the science curriculum. 4. Developing a tour schedule with the Wheels to Water Program and writing up an oral presentation for the tour. 5. Removing invasive weeds: The invasive weeds account for at least 90%of the present groundcover, and most of the weeds are Himalayan blackberry. The weeds need to be removed in order to plant native vegetation. The roots of the weeds will be removed to inhibit the return growth of the weeds. The abundant Himalayan blackberries create a monoculture with a food source that has limited value since it is not eaten by much of the wildlife. 6. Planting native trees,shrubs and forbs: Approximately 500 trees, shrubs and forbs will be planted with numerous species of each.Native vegetation will enhance the area by providing food sources, shade and habitat for the wildlife; and a diversity of native vegetation will provide a variety of food and habitat sources. Native trees will also control erosion, storm-water run-off, clean the air and absorb contaminants in the soil. 7. Soil amendments: Mulch will be added around the areas where the native vegetation is planted. Mulch will help retain the moisture in the soil, control weeds as well as enrich the soil as it decays. A natural fertilizer, such as biosolids, will be added as necessary. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 6 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 8. Installing a drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system will keep the native vegetation hydrated and increase their chance of survival. Watering is critical especially during the area's dry summer months. 9. Maintenance and monitoring of the restoration site: Monitoring includes checking and recording the condition of the native plants,the drip irrigation system, the growth of the invasive weeds and wildlife activity. Maintenance involves repairing the drip irrigation system, removing the growing weeds, replacing dead native plants and protecting the native plants from being eaten by wildlife. Frequent maintenance and monitoring will help keep the invasive growth from getting out of control and help insure the successful growth of the native vegetation as well as catch any other problems that come up. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Other Total King County Funds Waterworks (specify) Grant Salaries and Benefits $1,034 $14,000 $15,034 Travel/Meals/Mileage $253 $2,043 $2,296 Office/Field Supplies $3,489 $12,728 $16,217 Contracted/Professional $15,138 $15,138 Services Land Acquisition Permits $93 97 190 Other(Fiscal Agents) $4,684 $4,684 TOTAL 1 $4,869 1 $48,690 1 1 $53,559 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. The KCD contribution will be noted on the signs that will be placed at the two restoration sites upon the termination of the project. King County has been advised that KCD funds will potentially be the source of the cash match for the project for both phases. Any newspaper articles or photos will acknowledge KCD as a contributor to the project. KCD will be acknowledged as a contributor and partner in the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation. KCD will also be mentioned and acknowledged in other correspondence related to the project. regg Z r ,P. Date PBPW A trator H:\FileSys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\[003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc d AGREEMENT FOR AWARD OF NONCOMPETITIVE GRANT City of Renton This Agreement is made between the King Conservation District Number 9, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 935 Powell Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 (referred to herein as "District"), and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 1055 South Grady Way, Renton Washington 98055 (referred to herein as "Recipient"), for the purposes set forth herein. SECTION 1. RECITALS 1.1 Whereas, the District is a special purpose district organized and existing under authority of Chapter 89.08 RCW. The District engages in and provides certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and 1.2 Whereas, on December 15, 2000, the Metropolitan King County Council enacted King County Ordinance No. 14016 which, among other things, provides for the distribution of noncompetitive grant funds from a portion of the special assessments imposed by King County Ordinance No. 14016 and collected by the District pursuant to Chapter 89.08 RCW; and 1.3 Whereas, on November 19, 1998, the District adopted Resolution No. 98-20 relating to the policy and procedures governing the District's award of any noncompetitive grants authorized by King County; and 1.4 Whereas, the District has reviewed the grant application submitted by Recipient and has determined that the application meets the requirements of Chapter 89.08 RCW and the District's policy and procedures for awarding noncompetitive grants; and 1.5 Whereas, the District and Recipient desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of establishing the terms and conditions relating to the District's award of a noncompetitive grant to Recipient. SECTION 2. AGREEMENT 2.1 The District agrees to award Recipient a grant in the total amount of Fifty-five thousand eighty-four dollars and 85 cents ($55,084.85) ($10,618.51 from 2002 Assessments, $16,271.58 from 2003 Assessments, $16,656.05 from 2004 Assessments, and $11,538.71 from 2005 Assessments). Grant funds shall be used by Recipient solely for the performance of the work described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The District shall pay the grant funds to Recipient in accordance with the following paragraphs. 2.1.1 Grant funds from 2002, 2003, and 2004 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient within five(5) business days after District's receipt of a fully executed Agreement. - 1 - Y 2.1.2 Grant funds from 2005 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient on or before January 31, 2005, provided that such funds have been collected and received by the District and thereafter in quarterly installments as funds are received. 2.2 Recipient represents and warrants that it will only use the grant funds for the work described in Exhibit A, which may be amended by the parties pursuant to Paragraph 3.3 of the Agreement. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized work. Further, Recipient agrees to return to the District any grant funds that are not expended and/or remain after completion of the work covered by this Agreement. 2.3 Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the grant funds may only be expended on work which shall be entirely within the District's jurisdictional boundaries. The following municipal entities are not within the District's jurisdictional boundaries: Enumclaw, Federal Way, Milton, Pacific, and Skykomish. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for work performed outside the District's jurisdictional boundaries. 2.4 In the event the scope of work authorized by this Agreement includes the use of grant funds to purchase houses located on real property within a flood hazard area, Recipient acknowledges and agrees that grant funds may only be used for such purposes if the houses to be purchased were constructed before floodplam mapping or sensitive areas regulations were in place for that area. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized purposes. 2.5 Recipient shall be required to provide the District with biannual financial and project progress reports, along with an annual summary report. Financial and project reports shall be due May 31 and November 30 each year. The Recipient shall also be required to submit to the District a final report which documents the Recipient's completion of the work in conformance with this Agreement within thirty(30) days after the completion of the work. The final report shall, among other things, summarize the project's successes and shall address the regional benefits accomplished by the work. The final report shall also identify any obstacles or challenges which were encountered during the work, along with general recommendations regarding ways to avoid such obstacles or challenges in the future. If requested, Recipient agrees to provide the District with additional financial or progress reports from time to time, at reasonable intervals. 2.6 Recipient's expenditures of grant funds shall be separately identified in the Recipient's accounting records. If requested, Recipient shall comply with other reasonable requests made by the District with respect to the manner in which project expenditures are tracked and accounted for in Recipient's accounting books and records. Recipient shall maintain such records of expenditures as may be necessary to conform to generally accepted accounting principals and to meet the requirements of all applicable state and federal laws. - 2 - 2.7 Recipient shall be required to track project expenses using the Budget Accounting and Reporting System for the State of Washington("BARS"). 2.8 The District or its representative shall have the right from time to time, at reasonable intervals, to audit the Recipient's books and records in order to verify compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Recipient shall cooperate with the District in any such audit. 2.9 Recipient shall retain all accounting records and project files relating to this Agreement in accordance with criteria established in the Revised Code of Washington and the Washington State Archivist. 2.10 Recipient shall ensure that all work performed by Recipient or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors is performed in a manner which protects and safeguards the environment and natural resources and which is in compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations. Recipient shall implement an appropriate monitoring system or program to ensure compliance with this provision. 2.11 Recipient agrees that in the event a court of competent jurisdiction finds that the imposition or collection of the special assessments authorized by King County Ordinance No. 14016 are unlawful and orders the repayment of such assessments, Recipient agrees to reimburse the District for the full amount of the grant award, including any interest which may be awarded by the court. 2.12 Recipient agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, its agents, officers, officials and employees from all claims, alleged liability, damages, losses to or death of person or damage to property allegedly resulting from the acts of the Recipient or any of its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. 2.13 Recipient agrees to acknowledge the District as a source of funding for this project on all literature, signage or press releases related to said project. SECTION 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 3.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No prior or contemporaneous representation, inducement, promise or agreement between or among the parties which relate to the subject matter hereof which are not embodied in this Agreement shall be of any force or effect. 3.3 No amendment to this Agreement shall be binding on any of the parties to this Agreement unless such amendment is in writing and is executed by the parties. The parties - 3 - contemplate that this Agreement may from time to time be modified by written amendment which shall be executed by duly authorized representatives of the parties and attached to this Agreement. 3.4 Each party warrants and represents that such party has full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement and each person executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents that he/she has been fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and that such party is bound by the signature of such representative. 3.5 Expenditure of grant funds shall be subject to appropriation by the Metropolitan King County Council. DISTRICT: RECIPIENT: By By Name Name Title Title Date Date Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form: DISTRICT LEGAL COUNSEL: RECIPIENT'S ATTORNEY: c By - By Name f C. C° Name Date ! 3 0-sr Date - 4 - Exhibit A Project Name: SW 34`h Street Culvert Contact: Allen Quynn Re lacement Project A licant: City of Renton Title: Project Manager Principal Partners (if any): Address: 1055 S. Grady Way City of Renton Renton, WA 98055 Total Pro'ect Cost: $900,000 estimated Phone: 425-430-7247 KCD Funding Requested: $55,084.85 Fax: 425-430-7247 Project Start Date: April 2005 E-mail: aguynn@ci.renton.wa.us Project End Date: Fall 2007 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): The purpose of this project is to replace the existing Springbrook Creek culvert crossing of SW 341h Street in Renton, Washington. The crossing consists of 4 existing, undersized corrugated metal (CMP)culverts that will be replaced with a new box culvert. Springbrook Creek is the main drainage channel for the 24-square mile Black River Basin that includes portions of the Cities of Renton, Kent, Tukwila and unincorporated King County. Springbrook Creek drains to the Black River Pump Station where flows are pumped into the Green River(see attached figures 6-1 and 6-2). The fisheries resources within Springbrook Creek include Chinook and Coho salmon, steelhead and cutthroat trout. The existing culverts were constructed in 1980 and are a major restriction of flows that contribute to the flooding problems in portions of the south valley during storm events. The project consists of the following elements: • Construction of a new box culvert including stream bypass. • Placement of spawning gravel in the bottom of the culvert. • Placement of woody debris on the sides of the channel. • Planting of riparian trees and shrubs along channel bank. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts, provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): The project will accomplish the following objectives: • Eliminate flooding of the SW 30 Street/Springbrook Creek crossing during the 100-yr storm event. • Lower upstream water levels, which will increase the capacity of local storm systems in Lind Avenue and SW 30 Street. • Upsizing the SW 34`h Street culvert in conjunction with future pipe system improvements will help the City meet flood protection goals in the valley. • Provide improved fish passage and riparian habitat for salmonid migration. The following provides a brief description of how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.01: "To prepare and keep current a comprehensive long-range program recommending the conservation of all the renewable natural resources of the District. Such King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application programs shall be directed toward the best use of renewable natural resources and in a manner that will best meet the needs of the District and the state, taking into consideration,where appropriate,such uses as farming, grazing,timber supply, forest, parks, outdoor recreation, potable water supplies for urban and rural areas, water for agriculture, minimal flow, and industrial uses, watershed stabilization, control of soil erosion, retardation of water run-off, flood prevention and control,reservoirs and other water storage, restriction of developments of flood plains, protection of open space and scenery, preservation of natural beauty, protection of fish and wildlife, preservation of wilderness areas and wild rivers,the prevention or reduction of sedimentation and other pollution in rivers and other waters, and such location of highways, schools, housing developments, industries, airports and other facilities and structures as will fit the needs of the state and be consistent with the best uses of the renewable natural resources of the state. The program shall include an inventory of all renewable natural resources in the District, a compilation of current resource needs, projections of future resource requirements, priorities for various resource activities, projected timetables, descriptions of available alternatives,and provisions for coordination with other resource programs. Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project meets the above criteria by reducing flooding of SW 34`" Street as well as upstream storm systems that discharge to Springbrook Creek. The new culvert will be designed to prevent flooding of the SW 34" Street crossing during the 100-yr storm event and lower tail water conditions for outfalls discharging upstream. The project will also help protect fish by lowering stream velocities during storm events through the new culvert to facilitate fish passage. KCD Strategic Plan Initiate: This proposal meets the strategic plan element 2,d (ill)Support for Regional Conservation Initiatives, which states: "The District will join in regional conservation initiatives,lending its leadership and expertise on issues such as major river flooding, preserving and restoring fish habitat,protecting and restoring water quality in watersheds and general public conservation education programs in the region". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is one element of a series of projects recommended in the City of Renton's 1997 East Side Green River Watershed Plan and EIS (ESGRWP), which was a basin wide planning level study to identify projects that would help reduce the flooding in the Renton valley area. The ESGRWP identified the replacement of the SW 30 Street crossing of Springbrook Creek to reduce upstream water levels and improve fish passage. As discussed under the previous criteria,the proposed project will eliminate flooding of SW 34`" Street during the 100-yr storm as well as reduce flooding in local storm systems upstream that discharge to the creek. The project will also improve water quality and provide wildlife habitat with the addition of riparian plantings such as native shrubs and trees along the channel bank. In-stream woody debris will also be added to provide fish rearing and refuge habitat. Springbrook Creek is within Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA) 9. The draft WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan identifies the need for improving fish passage riparian habitat and water quality to benefit Chinook salmon and other salmonids. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\I003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Regional Funding Principles Established by the King CountERegional Task Force The project satisfies regional task force funding principles criteria 3,1(ii), which states: "Habitat restoration which enhances ecological significant fish runs". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is located on Springbrook Creek, which historically has poor water quality, particularly low dissolved oxygen due to high water temperatures. The basin, especially the valley floor has become highly urbanized with large commercial and industrial areas that directly discharge to Springbrook Creek. This project will address water quality by planting plants and trees along the channel bank that will help provide shade and help cool the creek during the summer months. Woody debris will also be incorporated into the project to provide channel rearing and refuge habitat for salmon. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Project activities include the following: • Replace existing undersized culverts with a new box culvert to increase conveyance capacity and reduce flooding of SW 34`h Street and upstream storm pipe systems. • Construct stream bypass during provide dewatering of groundwater during construction. • Relocate utilities. • Provide a more natural and better-lined streambed to enhance fish passage. This includes adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert. • Provide riparian habitat planting including a mix of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Measurable Results include: • After project construction,observe lower water surface elevations in the channel upstream of SW 34th Street during high flow events. • A year after construction complete, observe the establishment of native riparian plants in areas planted as part of project restoration. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Total Salaries and Benefits ('it , of Renton Travel/Mea IS/Mileage Office/Field Supplies Contracted/Professional $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 Services Land Ac uisition Permits Other TOTAL $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,p0- 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. H:Tile Sys\S WA-Surface Water Section Administration\S WA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Funding will be acknowledged,reported and tracked using the State of Washington Accounting and Reporting System or"BARS". The use of taxpayer funds provided through the King Conservation District for the above-described projects will be acknowledged through newspaper articles,websites or other information released during project implementation. Attachments 7 ' Gregg Z' Mtr Date PBPW Ad //or HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp .�---- East Side Gen River Black River �,.••' a Watershed 6undary - King �;ounty '' Water Quality � Management Plan •' Study Area000* -•'� I • •-... ,i ,I • ,.•� L. ••'"•'� I ,�e Panther Lake LKing Count Garrison 405 i I .•'� Renton / Creek j I I � Renton -1 King County _ I • Springbrook •C'r. C._._._. '�•♦. rj Valley Area co 167 Kent L Springbrook Creek L' 1 Fast Valle Road i Springbrook r— — -� Creak Renton Mill C 167 Tukwila Black River `«'' ice' een i 181 -- 181 ruk - -- ---- - Pump Station i wiia N N Kent Tukwila Vj� Kent Lagoons I i � EAST SIDE GREEN RNER x 1-5 er WATERSHED PROJECT b s ' 0 3000 6000 o t..._.._.._.J > FIGURE 6-1 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET \ PROJECT AREA Y s I Ir a ML W... IL IL - J.A.W.K--NWQ1\RA001002 5-13-9$0 0&,09 ............................................ ............ -D X co cl -,o M 0 —A, c:1 SHOPPING II 10, P4 ...... ig CENTER 40 S SW ........... r ........... ............ .................. Z..... ............. .......... .......... f m 600 ---........ .. ...... sw ........... .................... .................. ..................... 48*' X (A 1--.....). .... ��L 11 $W 7t jST mi r.-.......................... .. ................ m 00 z 3) 0 ......... P- D. 0 G ........... o I C) i rT, ::� (A Pork Ride A% C-) r- >. I J1 > > 1/ 01110 z ;0 If 0 'N m rn z cp,N� -�D Q S RENTON VILLAGE PL ........... 12kh ........... ........ ..... ...................... 51 ........... cl�A 'A RR . .... lie.......... ........ U ....................... Z I ................ .......... ........ R C-n ............... .............. ;of s 15(h to I SW 16th ST S STM..J............ .................. L. ........ V�-1........... i� 16th v 11-11111111.11.1 V. ............ .............. ............................. ................................ .................. $ 16th 1 10 1:`. ..... ... 9t�_ST. sw ....... ....... .......... ............. ........ ............. 600 "N, ;�y sw 1st ST If N • 23rd SW 23rd ST ................... i ,� .W. -f i� ` :w�' :1,/„/f I m C4 C"t 7\- SIN 27th ST sw 2,7t.h-....S.T................... ............ . ........11 'N'1 , -.................... .................. J> c: m r 24' m m m > 0 z to M SW..29th (A ....... ............... ...................... m z I I eD > cr) 0 z m PO. vcp z Ln z m > 30- Z A r SW 34th ST sw .......... .. . ..... 34th ST . ........... ......... ........ .......... ............................................... 36'm .......... 37th .1 SW 39th ST ....................................................... It ....... .................RR ..................... ........................... "i m ............................ ..... ........... ......... ... .............. ....................... 04 .......... ............................................... z > ......... 00 1 moist SW 41st.................j) I.................. ................. ST az ....... ............. �, i / n LIP . ............ ..................... r rn 12" < c m t Gam. m Q kF m sw 36" 43rd .......... ............................. I ST 54' SW 43rd 48" ST.... ------- ............. .............. :..... ...... ..... ....... ......... .......... .................. J. . ....... ..�n CITY OF KEN T .6th Y-T -4 th PL I ..... ...... .......................... R CITY OF RENTON Office of the City Attorney Lawrence J.Warren Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Senior Assistant City Attorneys Mark Barber Zanetta L.Fontes NOV 2 8 2M0d Assistant City Attorneys Ann S. Nielsen OF R- f�TOR, Garmon Newsom II :,- , Sasha P. Alessi MEMORANDUM TO: Allen Quynn, Utilities FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney DATE: November 23, 2005 RE: Resolution authorizing interlocal cooperative agreement with King Conservation Dist. No. 9 A copy of the above-mentioned legislation is attached; the original has been sent to the City Clerk. G71 Lawrence jarren LJW:ma Enc. cc: Bonnie Walton Post Office Box 626-Renton,Washington 98057-(425)255-8678/FAX(425)255-5474 R E N T O N ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR AWARD OF A NON- COMPETITIVE GRANT. WHEREAS, King Conservation District No. 9 has funds available to it to assist the City of Renton in providing certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has applied for and received a grant to perform such activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions relating to the award of the grant to the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement for the award of a non-competitive grant to the City of Renton from King Conservation District No. 9. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 72005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk 1 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES:1145:11/23/05:ma 2 ► CITY OF RENTON Office of the City Attorney Lawrence J.Warren Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Senior Assistant City Attorneys Mark Barber Zanetta L.Fontes Assistant City Attorneys Ann S. Nielsen Garmon Newsom II Sasha P. Alessi MEMORANDUM TO: Libby Parker, PBPW FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney DATE: December 1, 2005 RE: Resolution for SW 3e Street Culvert Replacement Project grant The Agreement for the grant for the SW 3e Street Culvert Replacement Project with King Conservation District Number 9, is approved as to legal form. The original of the authorizing resolution has been sent to the City Clerk and a copy is attached. awrence J.�Warr LJW:ma Enc. cc: Bonnie Walton Allen Quynn Post Office Box 626-Renton,Washington 98057-(425)255-8678/FAX(425)255-5474 RE N T O N ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR AWARD OF A NON- COMPETITIVE GRANT FOR THE SW 34TH STREET CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT. WHEREAS, King Conservation District No. 9 has funds available to it to assist the City of Renton in providing certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has applied for and received a grant to perform such activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions relating to the award of the grant to the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION 11 The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement for the award of a non-competitive grant to the City of Renton from King Conservation District No. 9, for the SW 34'h Street Culvert Replacement Project. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 72005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk 1 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES:1145:12/1/05:ma 2 ti`sY O� PLANNING/BUILDING/ �- - ♦ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 5, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor Allen Quynn, Surface Water Engineer SUBJECT: 2002-2005 King Conservation District Agreement for Noncompetitive Grants ISSUE: Should the Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to (1)execute an agreement with the King Conservation District(KCD)to accept the City of Renton annual share of the approved King Conservation District assessment, and(2) approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance? RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department staff recommends that Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King County Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservation District fund allocation from 2002 to 2005. In addition, staff also requests that the Council approve using a portion($4,869) of Renton's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The City of Renton became a member of the King Conservation District in March 1992, upon the passage of Resolution No. 2885. At that time, the King County Council approved a$1.25 per parcel assessment against all properties within jurisdictions that are members of the King Conservation District on August 16, 1993. Subsequently, K.C. Ordinance 12959, approved by the King County Council in December 1997, adopted the Regional Water Quality Committee's recommendation to raise the Conservation District annual assessment from $1.25 per parcel to $5 per parcel. The $1.25 per parcel assessment had been in place since the King County Council adopted Ordinance 10981 in Terri Briere December 5,2005 Page 2 of 2 August 1993 and was renewed in 1995 by Ordinance 12095. The Ordinances provide that the generated revenues be distributed as follows: • $3 distributed equally to each of the five watershed forums • $1 per parcel to the County and each city in the District from which the funds were collected • $1 per parcel to the District for implementation of its approved work program. The District will either spend the funds in cities by providing services, or will transfer the funding to the cities to be used as financial assistance for stream restoration, fish habitat, and/or water quality projects. Based on the assessment collected in 2004 by the King Conservation District, the annual share available to Renton is approximately $16,393 per year. The grant funds could be used to pay the District for specific additional services or could be transferred to the City for use on eligible projects. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of a total KCD assessment from 2002 through 2005 estimated at $65,936. The amount of the agreement does not match the total estimated assessment due to the fact that the agreement amount is based on the approved grant application submitted in July of this year. The amount requested in the application was based on the estimated 2005 assessment at the time the application was prepared. Since that time, the estimated 2005 assessment has been revised by KCD to include an additional $6,000.15. Although the balance of$6,000.15 cannot be used under the 2005 agreement, it will be available for the City to use for future projects covered under a separate grant application and subsequent agreement. The KCD assessment will be used to fund the City sponsored SW 34`, Street Drainage Improvement Project ($55,084.85) and the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored b� the Black River Watershed Alliance ($4,869). Both of these projects will help to restore fish habitat as well as improve water quality in the Springbrook Creek Basin. Attached is a brief description of projects that are being requested for funding by the district for this year. Also attached is a copy of an agreement to allow the transfer of funds from the King Conservation District to the City along with a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. CONCLUSION: Council approvev a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with the King Conservation District to accept the City of Renton share of the approved King Conservation District assessment and approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\Issue Paper.docAQlp CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of- Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division/ Surface December 5, 2005 Water Utility Staff Contact...... Ron Straka(ext. 7248) Allen Quynn (ext. 7247) Agenda Status Consent.............. X Subject: Public Hearing.. 2002-2005 king Conservation District Agreement for Correspondence.. Noncompetitive Grants Ordinance............. Resolution............ Old Business........ Exhibits: New Business....... Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Resolution Information......... Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grants Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other............... X Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $0 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... $59,953.85 (requested fund allocation for 2002-2005) Total Project Budget... City Share Total Project... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The King Conservation District (KCD) agreement allows the transfer of the City of Renton's $1 per parcel share of the $5 per parcel KCD Assessment of parcels within Renton. The grant funding can be used on projects that are approved by KCD such as water quality, habitat enhancement, water and fisheries resource protection projects and programs. The current estimated balance of the grant funding available to the City from 2002 through 2005 is approximately$65,936.00. This includes the yearly accrued assessment from prior years (2002-2004) of$49,178.20 plus the estimated 2005 allocation of$16,757.80. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of the total 2002-2005 estimated assessment to fund the following projects: (1) The City sponsored SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project, and (2) the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1 hprove a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King County Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservation District fund allocation from 2002 to 2005. In addition, staff also requests that the Council approve using a portion ($4,869) of Renton's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1 I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\AgenBill-grant funds.doc\AQlp CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR AWARD OF A NON- COMPETITIVE GRANT. WHEREAS, King Conservation District No. 9 has funds available to it to assist the City of Renton in providing certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has applied for and received a grant to perform such activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions relating to the award of the grant to the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement for award of non-competitive grant to the City of Renton from King Conservation District No. 9. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of December, 2005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\reso(ution.doc RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of December, 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 2 Project Name: SW 34'h Street Culvert Contact: Allen Quynn Replacement Project Applicant: City of Renton Title: Project Manager Principal Partners (if any): Address: 1055 S. Grady Way City of Renton Renton, WA 98055 Total Project Cost: $900,000 estimated Phone: 425-430-7247 KCD Funding Requested: $55,084.85 Fax: 425-430-7247 Project Start Date: April 2005 E-mail: a u nn ci.renton.wa.us Project End Date: Fall 2007 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): The purpose of this project is to replace the existing Springbrook Creek culvert crossing of SW 341h Street in Renton, Washington. The crossing consists of 4 existing, undersized corrugated metal (CMP)culverts that will be replaced with a new box culvert. Springbrook Creek is the main drainage channel for the 24-square mile Black River Basin that includes portions of the Cities of Renton, Kent, Tukwila and unincorporated King County. Springbrook Creek drains to the Black River Pump Station where flows are pumped into the Green River(see attached figures 6-1 and 6-2). The fisheries resources within Springbrook Creek include Chinook and Coho salmon, steelhead and cutthroat trout. The existing culverts were constructed in 1980 and are a major restriction of flows that contribute to the flooding problems in portions of the south valley during storm events. The project consists of the following elements: • Construction of a new box culvert including stream bypass. • Placement of spawning gravel in the bottom of the culvert. • Placement of woody debris on the sides of the channel. • Planting of riparian trees and shrubs along channel bank. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts,provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): The project will accomplish the following objectives: • Eliminate flooding of the SW 34`1'Street/Springbrook Creek crossing during the 100-yr storm event. • Lower upstream water levels,which will increase the capacity of local storm systems in Lind Avenue and SW 34`h Street. • Upsizing the SW 34`h Street culvert in conjunction with future pipe system improvements will help the City meet flood protection goals in the valley. • Provide improved fish passage and riparian habitat for salmonid migration. The following provides a brief description of how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.01: "To prepare and keep current a comprehensive long-range program recommending the conservation of all the renewable natural resources of the District. Such King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application programs shall be directed toward the best use of renewable natural resources and in a manner that will best meet the needs of the District and the state, taking into consideration, where appropriate, such uses as farming, grazing,timber supply, forest, parks, outdoor recreation, potable water supplies for urban and rural areas, water for agriculture, minimal flow, and industrial uses, watershed stabilization, control of soil erosion,retardation of water run-off, flood prevention and control, reservoirs and other water storage, restriction of developments of flood plains, protection of open space and scenery, preservation of natural beauty, protection of fish and wildlife, preservation of wilderness areas and wild rivers,the prevention or reduction of sedimentation and other pollution in rivers and other waters, and such location of highways, schools, housing developments, industries, airports and other facilities and structures as will fit the needs of the state and be consistent with the best uses of the renewable natural resources of the state. The program shall include an inventory of all renewable natural resources in the District, a compilation of current resource needs, projections of future resource requirements, priorities for various resource activities,projected timetables, descriptions of available alternatives, and provisions for coordination with other resource programs. Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project meets the above criteria by reducing flooding of SW 34`h Street as well as upstream storm systems that discharge to Springbrook Creek. The new culvert will be designed to prevent flooding of the SW 34`h Street crossing during the 100-yr storm event and lower tail water conditions for outfalls discharging upstream. The project will also help protect fish by lowering stream velocities during storm events through the new culvert to facilitate fish passage. KCD Strategic Plan Initiate: This proposal meets the strategic plan element 2,d (111)Support for Regional Conservation Initiatives, which states: "The District will join in regional conservation initiatives,lending its leadership and expertise on issues such as major river flooding,preserving and restoring fish habitat,protecting and restoring water quality in watersheds and general public conservation education programs in the region". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is one element of a series of projects recommended in the City of Renton's 1997 East Side Green River Watershed Plan and EIS(ESGRWP),which was a basin wide planning level study to identify projects that would help reduce the flooding in the Renton valley area. The ESGRWP identified the replacement of the SW 34`h Street crossing of Springbrook Creek to reduce upstream water levels and improve fish passage. As discussed under the previous criteria,the proposed project will eliminate flooding of SW 34th Street during the 100-yr storm as well as reduce flooding in local storm systems upstream that discharge to the creek. The project will also improve water quality and provide wildlife habitat with the addition of riparian plantings such as native shrubs and trees along the channel bank. In-stream woody debris will also be added to provide fish rearing and refuge habitat. Springbrook Creek is within Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA)9. The draft WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan identifies the need for improving fish passage riparian habitat and water quality to benefit Chinook salmon and other salmonids. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Regional Funding Principles Established by the King County Regional Task Force The project satisfies regional task force funding principles criteria 3,1(11), which states: "Habitat restoration which enhances ecological significant fish runs". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is located on Springbrook Creek, which historically has poor water quality, particularly low dissolved oxygen due to high water temperatures. The basin, especially the valley floor has become highly urbanized with large commercial and industrial areas that directly discharge to Springbrook Creek. This project will address water quality by planting plants and trees along the channel bank that will help provide shade and help cool the creek during the summer months. Woody debris will also be incorporated into the project to provide channel rearing and refuge habitat for salmon. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Project activities include the following: • Replace existing undersized culverts with a new box culvert to increase conveyance capacity and reduce flooding of SW 34`" Street and upstream storm pipe systems. • Construct stream bypass during provide dewatering of groundwater during construction. • Relocate utilities. • Provide a more natural and better-lined streambed to enhance fish passage. This includes adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert. • Provide riparian habitat planting including a mix of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Measurable Results include: • After project construction, observe lower water surface elevations in the channel upstream of SW 34`h Street during high flow events. • A year after construction complete, observe the establishment of native riparian plants in areas planted as part of project restoration. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Total City of Renton Salaries and Benefits Travel/Meals/Mileage Office/Field Supplies Contracted/Professional $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 Services Land Acquisition Permits Other TOTAL $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Funding will be acknowledged, reported and tracked using the State of Washington Accounting and Reporting System or"BARS". The use of taxpayer funds provided through the King Conservation District for the above-described projects will be acknowledged through newspaper articles, websites or other information released during project implementation. Attachments Gregg Zi I Date PBPW Ad str 2or HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\]003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 1 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Project Name: Black River Channel Native Contact: Doris Yepez Plant Restoration Project Applicant: Doris Yepez Title: Project Coordinator Phase 1 Fiscal Agent: Seattle Audubon Society Phase 2 Fiscal Agent: Duwamish Tribe Principal Partners (if any): Address: 16444 SE 135`" St. City of Renton Renton,WA 98059 Friends of Black River Herons Forever Duwamish Tribe Total Project Cost: $53,559.00 Phone: 425 891-0730 KCD Funding Requested: $4,869.00 Fax: 425 917-0872 Project Start Date: 9/29/2004 E-mail: dorisd and elion ahoo.coIn Project End Date: S rin 2008 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): There are two phases to the Black River Channel Restoration Project, Phase I and Phase 2, and the funding requested covers both Phases. The goals for both Phases are to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, and develop community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. Phase 1 began September 29, 2004,and concludes in Spring 2007 with a commitment to maintain and monitor the restoration site for two years. The restoration area for Phase I is .83 of an acre in size and located on the south bank of the Black River Channel, off of Monster Road SW, adjacent and immediately downstream from the DNRP Black River Pump Station and upstream from the Monster Road Bridge. Much of the work has been completed to date and included: 1. The removal of invasive plants on the top 20 ft. of the riverbank and in the adjoining field. 2_ The removal of 11 ecology blocks left on the property. 3. Scarification of the soil to loosen the gravelly soil on half of the field area. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger. 5. Sol] amendments. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs. 7. Installation of a drip irrigation system to increase the survival rate of the newly planted native vegetation. What remains is the monitoring and maintenance of the restoration site for the two year committed period. Phase 2 will begin in Fall 2005 and will conclude Spring 2008. Phase 2 is on the south bank as well, but immediately upstream from, and adjacent to,the DNRP Black River Pump Station. The restoration area is approximately ''/z acre in size. As in Phase 1, the goal is to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, as well as expand community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. The new site will also be monitored and maintained for two years. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts, provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): HA\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The project objectives are: • Provide shade, food sources and habitat improvements for the fish and wildlife through the removal of invasive weeds and the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs. • Acquaint the community and students with the Black River. • Educate the community and students about the Black River Channel Restoration Project and the Black River watershed, forest and channel ecosystem. • Involve the community and students in the restoration work. The following provides a brief description of specifically how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.450: "Watershed restoration projects--Intent. The legislature.declares that it is the goal of the state of Washington to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular,fish and wildlife and their habitat. It is further the policy of the state insofar as possible to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals." Description of how this project meets the first part of the criteria"to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular,fish and wildlife and their habitat": This project restores the riparian habitat along the Black River Channel and adjoining field, and improves the fish and wildlife habitat. Planting native trees,shrubs and forbs restores the area to its more natural state. In addition,the native trees planted along the riverbank will provide shade that will keep the temperatures of the water at a more desirable level for salmonids. The debris from the trees and shrubs, leaves falling, will also provide a source of food for the fish; and fallen trees will act as LWD,(Large Woody Debris), which give salmon areas to rest and spawn. The field area, with the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs, will provide a buffer from the noise and pollution of the street, as well as provide a diversity of food sources for the other wildlife,producing berries and flowers at different times of year. Also,once grown in,the vegetation will provide more habitat areas for the wildlife. Description of how this project meets the second part of the criteria"to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals": During Phase 1,there were four community events: one day for planting,two others for mulching and weeding, and the last was the installation of the drip irrigation system.Numerous groups helped with these tasks including Renton Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts,Campfire Girls,Herons Forever members,Friends of Black River, Duwamish tribal members, Sierra Club members,Boeing volunteers and the Briarwood Student Leadership Group. The same volunteer organizations will be asked to help with Phase 2 in order to increase the groups' sense of connection and commitment to the Black River and to give them the opportunity to see the growth and progress made through their participation in the restoration tasks during Phase 1. KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria As stated in the KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria, Section b ii):"Promoting Natural Habitat Restoration. The District will provide information and assistance to landowners, businesses, and other H:Tile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application citizens in rural and urban areas on the preservation and restoration of natural habitats including the creation of low-maintenance native plant habitats that conserve water and are friendly to wildlife, eco- landscaping, establishing naturescaping demonstration sites, intrusive species management and community stewardship". Description of how this project meets this criteria: The restoration work included, in Phase 1,the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field area, as well as the removal of other invasive shrubs such as the Butterfly bush. Maintenance of the restoration site includes weeding, specifically focusing on removing the new growth of Himalayan blackberries and Butterfly bush, and removing other weeds on the site that are on the Washington State and/or King County Noxious Weed List, namely,Tansy ragwort, Bull thistle and Oxeye daisy. Other invasive weeds will be removed as needed. Phase 2 also calls for the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field areas, and the removal of other noxious weeds present, which include Japanese knotweed. During Phase 1,community stewardship has been developed through the involvement of the different volunteer organizations in the restoration tasks and in the presentation of the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to four different groups. As stated in the KCD Strategic Initiative Section d, i): "Population Growth and Increased Urbanization. The District will actively promote workable solutions that help minimize the effects of population growth and increased urbanization on the natural environment." Description of how this project meets these criteria: When the planted native trees get larger,they will create a dense wooded area,a small forest, in a highly urbanized setting. The planting of trees in urban areas is very beneficial to the environment. Trees absorb contaminants, control erosion,reduce storm- water run-off by absorbing water through their roots, clean the air, and as stated above, are beneficial to the fish and wildlife by providing more shade, additional food sources and habitat. The trees,with the falling of large wooded debris,also enhance our stream systems. The grassy, field area that was part of the restoration site in Phase I was under laid with gravel to accommodate the trucks when the Black River Pump Station was built. One of the restoration tasks, during Phase 1, included ripping up the gravelly field and planting native trees,shrubs and forbs. Mulch was also added throughout the field area. The addition of mulch,and the decomposition of native vegetation in the future,will enrich the soil and help rebuild it. KCD Regional Funding Principles As stated in the#3 KCD Regional Funding Principles, iv),"Water quality and watershed restoration and protection support services such as coordination of monitoring(data collection,studies,evaluation)and public education programs". Description of how this project meets this criterion: During Phase 2, community involvement will expand to include the Renton schools and other local schools.Presently,there are two Renton schools,Lindbergh High School and Black River High School,which have provided written commitments to involve their students in hands-on learning at the Black River, as well as introducing a Black River component into their science curriculum. The Black River Riparian Forest, Channel and restoration areas will be used as a living laboratory for students to learn about scientific methods and concepts and to learn about the Black River and its components. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency CooperationWing Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The Black River Restoration Project will also be included as an option in a tour sponsored by the King County Waste Treatment program, Wheels to Water.A visit to the South Treatment Plant will include a tour of the Black River and the opportunity to participate in restoration tasks or learn about the history and components of the Black River through a walking tour of the Forest, Channel and restoration sites. In addition to the above,the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation shown to different groups during Phase 1, helped educate the public about the restoration work and the Black River. The PowerPoint presentations will also be shown to new groups participating in Phase 2. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Phase 1: I. Removal of invasive weeds: Himalayan blackberries were rampant on the riverbank and on a small vegetation island in the middle of the field. There were a few other invasives such as the Butterfly bush, but the Himalayan blackberry was the predominant invasive weed with a 50- 60%ground cover on the riverbank and a 35%ground cover on the island. Most of the invasive blackberries on the restoration site have been eradicated through the cutting and grubbing of the blackberries. Earthcorps was hired to cut and grub the blackberries on the top 20 ft. of the bank. Volunteers and salaried crew have removed the remainder of the blackberries on the island,and have been tackling the new growth of the Himalayan blackberry that is popping up throughout the site. A salaried person has also been cutting blackberries on the lower part of the bank, beyond the 20 ft., and throughout the site. 2. Removal of ecology blocks: There were 11 ecology blocks on the site before the project began. These have all been removed with the help of King County roads crew. 3. Ripping up of the gravelly field: Before the restoration work,the entire field area was grown over with grass and under laid with gravel that was deposited when the Black River Pump Station was built. It was almost impossible to dig into the field to plant native vegetation since the ground was so compacted. Half of the gravelly field was ripped up with the use of a backhoe,to allow for planting, and now the soil is looser. Thrushes were observed,on at least two different occasions,pecking at the soil since it has been loosened. The backhoe also removed the other invasive shrubs that were in the island. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger: In the other half of the gravelly field,20 rows of planting holes were dug with an auger. The field area is being used as a test site to see which side produces better results,the augured field area or the area where the backhoe ripped up the gravel and grass. 5. Soil amendments: Approximately 60 cubic yards of mulch was spread throughout the field area of the restoration site beginning January 2005 through May 2005. The mulch helps with weed control; helps keep some moisture close to the newly planted native vegetation,and will enhance the soil as it decays. The soil in the field area is nutrient poor, and some plants are in need of fertilizer.Biosolids are in the process of being purchased from the South Waste Treatment Plant to place around the plants that need some fertilizing. 6. The planting of 613 native trees,shrubs and forbs: Most of the native plants were planted in January 2005. Some were planted in February 2005, and approximately 10 more were donated and planted in May 2005. There has been less than a 2%mortality rate,and those were mostly the Pacific madrones, which have the reputation of being difficult to plant. 7. Installation of the drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system was installed in April 2005. A drip system is crucial at this site,especially in the field area, since the soil is very well-drained and does not retain water.A few of the native plants had yellowed a little with the early heat spell in February/March,but once the drip irrigation system was running,the plants regained their healthy, green look. The drip irrigation system is attached to the faucet at the Pump Station HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 5 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application and is turned on at least 4 times a week by the Pump Station crew, and occasionally on hot and dry weekends,by the restoration project coordinator. 8. Community involvement: The community has shown interest and support,evidenced with the large numbers of participants. For two of the community activity days,there were over 50 volunteers helping on each of those days. 9. Monitoring and maintenance: The project is being monitored and maintained at least twice a month. Partners to the grant, Herons Forever and Friends of Black River members,are helping with the maintenance and monitoring. Monitoring includes tracking the condition of the native vegetation,the growth of the invasive weeds,checking the drip irrigation system and noting any wildlife in the area. Maintenance includes protecting the native vegetation from being eaten, if necessary; removing the invasive weeds by either weed whacking, or manually cutting then grubbing, as in the case of the blackberries; replacing dead native vegetation and repairing, if necessary, the drip irrigation system. Monitoring and maintenance is very important in helping the native plants thrive as well as ensuring that they will not be out competed by the invasive weeds or eaten by wildlife. The project activities and measurable results for Phase 2 include: 1. Planning and organizing: A Scope of Work Budget for King County needs to be completed before December 2005. Dates for the different restoration tasks need to be set,vendors need to be contacted, materials need to be purchased,subcontractors need to be lined up,requests for payments and other paperwork need to be submitted to King County throughout the project. Other grant paperwork needs to be completed including a report to KCD. Reports are submitted to partners on a regular basis. Media will be solicited for the various community events. Planning and organizing is critical for the project to run smoothly and to get the needed tasks done. 2. Contacting different volunteer organizations: Different volunteer organizations will be contacted to help with the native planting,mulching and installation of the drip irrigation system. Involving the community will develop community stewardship of the Black River. We will attempt to involve the same organizations as last year,to strengthen community stewardship,and contact new groups as well. The new groups will be shown the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to acquaint them with the Black River and to build some desire and enthusiasm to help with the restoration tasks. 3. Contacting Lindbergh and Black River High Schools to set up dates for student participation in the restoration project and discuss the specifics of the addition of the Black River into the science curriculum. 4. Developing a tour schedule with the Wheels to Water Program and writing up an oral presentation for the tour. 5. Removing invasive weeds: The invasive weeds account for at least 90%of the present groundcover,and most of the weeds are Himalayan blackberry. The weeds need to be removed in order to plant native vegetation. The roots of the weeds will be removed to inhibit the return growth of the weeds. The abundant Himalayan blackberries create a monoculture with a food source that has limited value since it is not eaten by much of the wildlife. 6. Planting native trees,shrubs and forbs: Approximately 500 trees, shrubs and forbs will be planted with numerous species of each.Native vegetation will enhance the area by providing food sources, shade and habitat for the wildlife; and a diversity of native vegetation will provide a variety of food and habitat sources.Native trees will also control erosion, storm-water run-off, clean the air and absorb contaminants in the soil. 7. Soil amendments: Mulch will be added around the areas where the native vegetation is planted. Mulch will help retain the moisture in the soil,control weeds as well as enrich the soil as it decays. A natural fertilizer, such as biosolids,will be added as necessary. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\]003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 6 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 8. Installing a drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system will keep the native vegetation hydrated and increase their chance of survival. Watering is critical especially during the area's dry summer months. 9. Maintenance and monitoring of the restoration site: Monitoring includes checking and recording the condition of the native plants, the drip irrigation system,the growth of the invasive weeds and wildlife activity. Maintenance involves repairing the drip irrigation system, removing the growing weeds, replacing dead native plants and protecting the native plants from being eaten by wildlife. Frequent maintenance and monitoring will help keep the invasive growth from getting out of control and help insure the successful growth of the native vegetation as well as catch any other problems that come up. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Other Total King County Funds Waterworks (specify) Grant Salaries and Benefits $1,034 $14,000 $15,034 Travel/Meals/Mileage $253 $2,043 $2,296 Office/Field Supplies $3,489 $12,728 $16,217 Contracted/Professional $15,138 $15,138 Services Land Acquisition Permits $93 97 190 Other(Fiscal Agents) $4,684 $4,684 TOTAL 1 $4,869 $48,690 1 $53,559 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. The KCD contribution will be noted on the signs that will be placed at the two restoration sites upon the termination of the project. King County has been advised that KCD funds will potentially be the source of the cash match for the project for both phases. Any newspaper articles or photos will acknowledge KCD as a contributor to the project. KCD will be acknowledged as a contributor and partner in the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation. KCD will also be mentioned and acknowledged in other correspondence related to the project. m regg Zi r n,P. Date PBPW Ad trator HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc - RENTON 'CENT J i i rA( i t RD S V 4186 ��s s;l F MORRIS AV S B0T`- �j p� 4 /� n t v 4 1. ROLLING HILLS CREEK g ^ J} O 0 AT LICK Y`o i pV SHATTUCK:.:.`! ` 2 ` -- -..__ , =\VALLEY TALBOT CREEK W1LA ND GENERA LPATHER HOSPITAL - `O \ - a ---- ------\ ` Cal W % 136 x48 BOX----�• - SR.167_ -- - - — -- --- -- -r v{AV`;a_ in oQ tt E VALLEY RD fVALLEY Of $i;�'`,14 UND --- AV S LIND -- I ----- ---- 3 �'1 10 405 � Sw � , pla34cement' Street CUT P vert N' ' Replacement .o i $ENECA� ait t:n. ✓+- :n 3:.� rni: •-, z H r• Nii .: - W SCALE 1'=1000' THOMAS AV SW I € o Q ......... CONNECTING o CHANNEL PROJECT r -- - _ - - -- _ -- (COMPLETED _ 15'.—__—� 54' ?tf- L 1$- / f' 1995) AKESO` -r-- -— 3 ALE AV SW CJ? LEGEND VALLEY AREA " (STUDY AREA) 36" 36" DIAMETER STORM DRAIN 1 STREAM/DRAINAGE CHANNEL �• �` >—< CULVERT(S) ° Hi}� 1SIN !'.'-PUMP is PUMP STATION _ `•;; !� FRR LOOD WATER CREEK STORAGE POND TUKWILA — — ` —R�t RE RENTON CITY LIMITS EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER BLACk\�\ ,/ ;/ --.' !�_/_=—--— — __------- — WATERSHED PROJECT RIVER \ Y ;l�/ + _ WEST VALLEY HWY FIGURE 6-2 § PUMP ^� \� , RENTON VALLEY AREA STATION \\,., i \Q r" 4p i: EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO RIVER GREEN—DUWAMISH l� �NR\kR 1 �s�Fi— i grass nr =�a �nr.r `�Y O CITY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIAL AND �� ' '� " 'T" + 6 , LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 16, 2005 TO: Allen Quynn, Civil Engineer/Uti11ties FROM: Debbie Evans, Records Management Specialist/City Clerk Div. SUBJECT: CAG-05-203, King Conservation District 9 Grant - SW 341h St Culvert Replacement Project The attached original documents have been signed by City officials and are being returned to you for execution by other parties. When you receive the fully executed document, please forward a signed original to the City Clerk's office for our permanent record file. This matter will be on a periodic call-up schedule to remind you of this requirement, until our office receives the fully executed document. Thank you. Attachments King Conservation District 935 Powell Avenue SW•Renton,WA 98055•Phone(206)764-3410•Fax(206)764-6677•E-mail district@kingcd.org November 23,2005 Allen Quynn City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Dear Mr. Quynn, Enclosed are two copies each of two agreements for award of noncompetitive grant for the City of Renton Southwest 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project and the Black River Watershed Alliance Black River Channel Native Plant Restoration Project. These grants are funded with King Conservation District Special Assessment funds allocated to the City of Renton. Please forward both copies of the agreement for the Black River Watershed Alliance Black River Channel Native Plant Restoration Project to Doris Yepez after obtaining City Council approval for the project. After obtaining signatures from City of Renton representatives on the City of Renton Southwest 341h Street Culvert Replacement Project,return both copies of that Agreement to me. I will obtain the needed signatures from King Conservation District representatives and forward a signed original for your records. At that time, I will also forward a check for the amount of the grant. I am available to answer any questions you may have. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Brandy Reed District Co-Coordinator Enclosures V & ai KCD Ref:KCD Ref 05-156 Allen Quynn,City of Renton King Conservation District 935 Powell Avenue SW•Renton,WA 98055•Phone(206)764-3410•Fax(206)764-6677•E-mail district(@kingcd.org November 23,2005 Doris Yepez O Q Black River Watershed Alliance 16444 SE 135th Street Renton,WA 98055 Dear Doris, Two copies of an Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grant for the Black River Channel Native Plant Restoration Project have been forwarded to the City of Renton for approval. Once the City has approved the allocation of District grant funds for your project,they will forward the agreements to you for signature. After obtaining signatures from Black River Watershed Alliance representatives, return both copies of the Agreement to me. I will obtain the required signatures from King Conservation District representatives and forward a signed original for your records. At that time, I will also forward a check for the amount of the grant. I am available to answer any questions you may have. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Brandy Reed District Co-Coordinator KCD Ref: KCD Ref 05-157 Doris Yepez,Black River Watershed Alliance "R CITY OF RENTON PlanningBuilding/PublicWorks Department Kathy KeolkerWheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 20, 2005 Brandy Reed District Co-Coordinator 935 Powell Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT 9 GRANT-SW 34TH STREET CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT Dear Ms. Reed, Enclosed please find two original agreements, signed by the Mayor, for award of noncompetitive grant for the City of Renton Southwest 34`h Street Culvert Replacement Project. Please forward to me the signed original once the King Conservation District representatives have signed it. If you have any questions,please call me at 425-430-7247. Sincerely, Ae Allen Qiatn, TC Surfaceer Utility Project Manager Enclosures HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\signed agreement letter.docAQlp T O ' 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 N N 9 This paper contains 50%recycled material,30 post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CONCUFtRER— g DATE NAME AL/DA E ------------ ,.� December 20, 2005 Brandy Reed District Co-Coordinator 935 Powell Ave. SW Renton,WA 98055 SUBJECT: KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT 9 GRANT-SW 34T11 STREET CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT Dear Ms. Reed, Enclosed please find two original agreements, signed by the Mayor,for award of noncompetitive grant for the City of Renton Southwest 34t' Street Culvert Replacement Project. Please forward to me the signed original once the King Conservation District representatives have signed it. If you have any questions,please call me at 425-430-7247. Sincerely, Allen Quynn,P.E. Surface Water Utility Project Manager Enclosures HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\signed agreement letter.docAQlp CITY OF RENTON Planninouilding/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 20,2005 Doris Yepez Black River Watershed Alliance 16444 SE 135" St. Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT 9 GRANT -BLACK RIVER CHANNEL NATIVE PLANT RESTORATION PROJECT Dear Ms. Yepez, Enclosed please find two original agreements for award of noncompetitive grant for the Black River Channel Native Plant Restoration Project. The City Council has approved the use of the City's grant funds to be used toward your project. As specified in the enclosed letter from the King Conservation District, please sign both copies of the agreement and forward the signed originals to Brandy Reed. If you have any questions, please call me at 425-430-7247. Sincerely, Allen Quynn 'Project Manager,P.E. City of Renton Surface Water Utility Enclosures istrict\2002-2005 HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation D KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\letter to Doris Yepez.docAQlp 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 _ 111 ` O ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CONCVRRENCE -- DATE_L,°� a U `L1-5 AME NI 1A /D TE 20 � 0 4 December 20, 2005 _---_._. ._.. _.. Doris Yepez Black River Watershed Alliance 16444 SE 135`l' St. Renton,WA 98055 SUBJECT: KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT 9 GRANT -BLACK RIVER CHANNEL NATIVE PLANT RESTORATION PROJECT Dear Ms. Yepez, Enclosed please find two original agreements for award of noncompetitive grant for the Black River Channel Native Plant Restoration Project. The City Council has approved the use of the City's grant funds to be used toward your project. As specified in the enclosed letter from the King Conservation District,please sign both copies of the agreement and forward the signed originals to Brandy Reed. If you have any questions,please call me at 425-430-7247. Sincerely, Allen Quynn,Project Manager,P.E. City of Renton Surface Water Utility Enclosures HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City CorrespondenceUetter to Doris Yepez.docAQlp - RENTON �,! _ /SE I t S -SIAlTH R �E S� -----....._: _ .. ._ ..._.... _ _ cn SHOPPING Q> ........... _ ' i V .. _ - 'i yIg 9i ... J. ._.......... `\ 1N RD.. 6 9 ....... ._.- :. CENTER < ,, p� -� MORRIS AV � B0�- O� Tq� � S A V WHIT- t„ N Z ROLLING HILLS CREEK ----- t- - ..----...-........... ..... -- - : SHATTUCK w ? _ - € SHATTUCK \ _ _ - --�__--_. ...- D s 1 - pANs TAlBOT6R �- VALLEY _ �- \ _ _ _ PAN E CREEK Q� GENERAL ... _.. - : - _ _... .... _ �` _....... ---- - -- L `L. i v : i : P OSPI TA N\ _ P� ,< — Oq LLJ 167 - 1 1 \ 36 SR t_ BOX Z w _ ..z._ cry ...I.. - o' ' s E VALLEY RD - \ : : ; ' t LLEY 18 �- • .3 s •:.�;4L Via, - ;-•--- ,,;4 ---_- a,: " t! �; ElEN CN dd 60* i _. _ __ .........i s; IIND AV - - - - -_- -_ - - -- ' N ; € ;, r:• i :: co< AV i} �. �,. I SW - I v t Q 3 s 'Street - Ci 1v _. -- Replacement iw Re�I � t ;o : SENECA3€ :� t -.. Y t cn€ SCALE 1'=1000' - ------•-------- r -_ TNOMAS SW AV o' N (% c — te GO N i { L N POWELL AV SW u� 1 :Ai N40 CONNECTING o€ = CHANNEL PROJECT _, }— `D �$• `" �I (COMPLETED --- 54' ;, 'T'- : - 60 � 1995) moo:, 4 LE AV SW t 36' r- �' LEGEND VALLEY AREA 36" 36' . (STUDY AREA) DIAMETER STORM DRAIN m f ` 1• Ito < i r --. STREAM/DRAINAGE CHANNEL CULVERT(S) Cr JACKSON SW ( }Y PUMP STATION i I L • �FLOOD WATER -- CREEK a STORAGE POND - RR - -TUKWIIA \ RE NTON ---CITY LIMIT , , EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER WATE BLACK•-'�` SHED PROJECT WEST — g f �/f _ -_ -- VALLEY RIVER - -- _- - , PUMP HwY FIGURE 6 2 STATION � `: '' . RENTON VALLEY AREA x ` %< EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM RO E REEN DUWAMISH �\ � GREEN R .r--'-^•..� �. IV __ East Side Goen River Black River King bounty '� y Water Quality i ,� Watershed Bundar Management Plan •,.. � Study Area i•' / � �--" ' . �- ,�,. '� �- �, • -' { ��,�Z Panther Lake I 1 I j �• 4,1 405 j LKing Count Garrison 1 j �.• . 1 Creek 1 1 j Renton j � Renton I ' Kin Count � 1 •' r"J I g Y SpriIr ngbrook Mr. Valley Area rj V) 167 Kent L 0 Springbrook Creek East Valle Road Springbrook Creek Renton" Mill Cr 167 •�� / Tukwila eek �.• �1r • een �� Ken I Black River �/ r�k t j181 181 1 L.... I Pump Station wila t // I N 17114 Kent Tukwila " Kent —-� �� /• Lagoons 1-5 ` R��'er EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER n I WATERSHED PROJECT s 0 3000 6000 l FIGURE 6-1 s APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET PROJECT AREA CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR AWARD OF A NON- COMPETITIVE GRANT. WHEREAS, King Conservation District No. 9 has funds available to it to assist the City of Renton in providing certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has applied for and received a grant to perform such activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions relating to the award of the grant to the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement for award of non-competitive grant to the City of Renton from King Conservation District No. 9. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of November, 2005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk HAFi1e Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1 I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\resolution.doc RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of November, 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 2 KCD Special Assessment Funds Accounting of Collections and Projects Funded Summary: Collections 1994 — 2004 $128,454.04S�� S3. 5— Amount Utilized to Date $79,275.84 Amount Available Today $49,178.20 Estimated Collection 2005 $16,757.80 Amount Available Dec 2005 $65,936.00 Detail: Collections 1994 5,394.72 Collections 1995 5,591.18 Collections 1996 5,643.33 Collections 1997 5,737.96 Collections 1998 14,340.71 Collections 1999 13,641.31 Collections 2000 14,484.72 Collections 2001 15,204.97 Collections 2002 15,487.51 Collections 2003 16,271.58 Collections 2004 16,656.05 Estimated Collections 2005 16,757.80 Projects Funded to Date by KCD Assessments in Partnership with City of Renton: • Check, 1995 —Wetland Mitigation Bank and Springbrook Creek Improvements • Check, 1996 —Wetland Mitigation Bank and Springbrook Creek Improvements • Check, 1998 —Wetland Mitigation Bank and Springbrook Creek Improvements • KCD Contract, 2001/2002 — Black River Riparian Forest Wetland Buffer Restoration Project • Check 2002 — May Creek Action Plan Implementation • Check 2002 — Edmonds Avenue Pocket Park Services Donated by KCD to City of Renton in Partnership with Renton Park and Friends of the Black River: • 2003 — Black River Riparian Forest Wetland Buffer Restoration Project • 2004 — Black River Riparian Forest Wetland Buffer Restoration Project 0 2005 — Black River Riparian Forest Wetland Buffer Restoration Project m m King Conservation District Special Assessment Allocations to King County and Local Jurisdictions within the WRIA 9 Watershed As of 12/31/04 Allocation ESTIMATED ESTIMATED Total Estimated Allocation 94.97 Allocation Allocation Allocadon Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Allocation Jurisdiction 1994-97 Collected 1999 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 1994-2004 2005 o Algona 1,622.89. 997.00 938.08 1,030.55 991.59 1,018.70 1,088.40 1,088.40 8,775.61 1,011,30 LL Z Auburn 15,033.38 - 9,845.71 9,234.13 10,370.31 10,644.00 10.972.36 10,375.03 10,375.03 87,049.95 10,584,86 Black Diamond 1,348.94 - 966.16 1,559.31 1,623.89 1,595.11 1,650.16 1,690.47 1,690.47 12,124.50 1,619.20 W Burien 15,623.89 - 9,621.90 9,089.73 10,519.49 10,445.33 10,299.99 10,029.31 10,029,31 85,658.95 9,926.30 � Covington - - 4,506.57 4,376.96 4,754.67 4,395.20 4,886.06 5,006.12 5,006.12 32,931.70 4,776.93 Des Moines 10,544.59 - 8,737.90 8,223.73 8,935.63 8,846.31 8,903.33 9,234.60 9,234,60 72,660.69 8,617.62 ? Kent 18,886.70 16,184.47 17,680.48 18,991.05 19,327.15 19,495.32 18,660.77 18,660.77 147,886,71 18,928.55 King County 296,337.72 2,112.48 156,031.75 140,376,14 135,965.60 136,882.29 138,280.20 140,225.93 140,225.93 1,286,438.04 129,859,95 Maple Valley - - 4,650.76 4,692.74 4,941.48 4,892.40 5,307.37 5,802.64 5,802,64 36,090.03 5,153,12 Normandy Park 4,028.32 - 2,483.30 2,352.24 2,578.10 2,564.83 2,492.72 2,381.67 2,381.67 21,262.85 2,358.45 Renton 22,367.19 - 14,340.71 13,641.31 14,484.72 15,204.97 15,487.51 16,271.58 16,271.58 128,069.57 14,916.19 SeaTac 11,706.04 - 6,758.62 6,398.36 7,009.34 7,150.17 6,754,94 6,351.12 6,351.12 58,479.71 6,618.47 Seattle 287,981.96 3,850,45 173,362.64 167,568,23 178,805.76 178,195,56 178,829.12 178,160.25 178,160.25 1,524,914.42 172,720.07 Tukwila 4,897.43 4,897.43 9,794.86 4,897.43 3,512,137,59 391,988.44 D D a D D 9 V n v n i n fl 9 V V N m King Conservation District Special Assessment Status Report Restricted Fund.Balances for Local Jurisdictions within WRIA 9, including King County As of December 31, 20t?4 Total Amount Remitted Estimated Estimated Allocation or Contracted Amount Allocation 2005 0 Jurisdiction 1994-2004' as of 12/31/04 Amount Pending Remaining Available 12/31/05 U. Algona 8,775.61 - 8,775,61 1,011.30 wo Auburn 87,049.95 8,398.96 - 78,650.99 10,584,86 Black Diamond 12,124.50 - 10,434.03 1,690.47 1,619.20 Burien 85,658.95 - 30,000.00 55,658.95 9,926.30 zv Covington 32,931.70 - 7,800.00 25,131.70 4776,93 Des Moines 72,660.09 1,802.00 - 70,858.69 8,617.62 Q Kent 147,886.71 76,714.17 2,342.87 68 829.67 18,928.55 LO iGng County 1,286,438.04 1,280,248.26 - 6,189.78 129,859.95 Maple Valley 36,090.03 2,000.00 - 34,090.03 5,153.12 r Normandy Park 21,262.85 - - 21,262,85 2,358,45 Renton 128,069.57 83,031.91 - 45,037.66 14,916.19 'S`�,y�1 8s' SeaTac 58,479.71 19,314.19 - 39,165.52 6,618.47 Seattle 1,524,914.42 1,010,942.90 286,558.00 227,413.52 172,720.07 Tukwila 9.794.86 7,500.00 2,294.86 4,897.43 3,512,137,59 2,489,952.39 337,134,90 686,050.30 391,988.44 Lo L LD 2004 allocation estimated. Final allocation figures will be available February 2005 L N m N LO r-1 Ln CO m N m N Ronald Straka----Issue paper Page 1 From: Bonnie Walton To: Allen Quynn; Ronald Straka Date: 11/29/2005 8:49:29 AM Subject: Issue paper With your King Conservation District agenda bill: The following changes were requested to the Issue Paper: 1) p. 2 -the amounts $16,393 & $59,953.85: explain is accrued over 2002-2005. 2) p. 2 -2nd line of 2nd to last paragraph: insert the word "by" after the word "sponsored". 3) p. 2 -Conclusion: remove the "s"from approves so it reads "Council approve..." The following change is requested to the Agenda Bill: 1) Change Staff Recommendation wording so it reads: "Approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King Conservation District to accept the City's share of 2002-2005 fund allocation in the amount of$59,953.85, and approve use of$4,859 of the funds for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance." Bring the revised copy to the agenda bill meeting, or to me ahead of time. Thanks. Bonnie, x6502 CC: Linda Moschetti; Teresa Phelan Y PLANNINGBUILDING/ , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 5, 2005 CONCURRENCE_-, f TO: Terri Briere, Council President DATE —CS Members of the City Council NAME INITIAL :DATE VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 1 1y 1.eV i It FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator ; S STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor AQ _ Allen Quynn, Surface Water Engineer SUBJECT: 2002-2005 King Conservation District Agreement for Noncompetitive Grants ISSUE: Should the Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to (1) execute an agreement with the King Conservation District(KCD)to accept the City of Renton annual share of the approved King Conservation District assessment, and (2) approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance? RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department staff recommends that Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King County Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservation District fund allocation from 2002 to 2005. In addition, staff also requests that the Council approve using a portion ($4,869) of Renton's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The City of Renton became a member of the King Conservation District in March 1992, upon the passage of Resolution No. 2885. At that time, the King County Council approved a $1.25 per parcel assessment against all properties within jurisdictions that are members of the King Conservation District on August 16, 1993. Subsequently, K.C. Ordinance 12959, approved by the King County Council in December 1997, adopted the Regional Water Quality Committee's recommendation to raise the Conservation District annual assessment from $1.25 per parcel to $5 per parcel. The $1.25 per parcel assessment had been in place since the King County Council adopted Ordinance 10981 in 1 Terri Briere December 5,2005 Page 2 of 2 August 1993 and was renewed in 1995 by Ordinance 12095. The ordinances provide that the generated revenues be distributed as follows: • $3.00 distributed equally to each of the five watershed forums • $1.00 per parcel to the County and each city in the District from which the funds were collected • $1.00 per parcel to the District for implementation of its approved work program. The District will either spend the funds in cities by providing services, or will transfer the funding to the cities to be used as financial assistance for stream restoration, fish habitat, and/or water quality projects. Based on the assessment collected in 2004 by the King Conservation District, the annual share available to Renton is approximately $16,393 per year. The grant funds could be used to pay the District for specific additional services or could be transferred to the City for use on eligible projects. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of a total KCD assessment from 2002 through 2005 estimated at $65,936. The amount of the agreement does not match the total estimated assessment due to the fact that the agreement amount is based on the approved grant application submitted in July of this year. The amount requested in the application was based on the estimated 2005 assessment at the time the application was prepared. Since that time, the estimated 2005 assessment has been revised by KCD to include an additional $6,000.15. Although the balance of$6,000.15 cannot be used under the 2005 agreement, it will be available for the City to use for future projects covered under a separate grant application and subsequent agreement. The KCD assessment will be used to fund the City sponsored SW 34`h Street Drainage Improvement Project ($55,084.85) and the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance ($4,869). Both of these projects will help to restore fish habitat as well as improve water quality in the Springbrook Creek Basin. Attached, is a brief description of projects that are being requested for funding by the District for this year. Also attached, is a copy of an agreement to allow the transfer of funds from the King Conservation District to the City along with a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. CONCLUSION: Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with the King Conservation District to accept the City of Renton share of the approved King Conservation District assessment and approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\Issue PapendocAQlp �► CITY OF REN I O cOPY r Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator HECEIVED July 25, 2005 JUL 2 6 2005 CITY OF PEIVToM Ms. Brandy Reed UTILITY SYSTEMS Noncompetitive Grants Program Manager King Conservation District 935 Powell Avenue SW, Suite D Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT GRANT APPLICATIONS Dear Ms. Reed: Enclosed please find our 2005 King Conservation District Noncompetitive Grant Applications. These two applications are to cover the King Conservation District Special Assessment fund allocated to the City for 2002-2005,per King County Ordinance#12959. The first application is for the City sponsored SW 34`h Street Culvert Replacement Project. The second application is for the Black River Channel Restoration Project,sponsored by Doris Yepez. The.City requests the District allocate a portion of Renton's assessment fund for the Black River Channel Restoration Project. We also request any shortfall or surplus of funds,as a result of uncertainties in the 2004 and 2005 estimated allocation, be applied to the SW 34`h Street Culvert Replacement Project. Please submit our grant applications to the King Conservation District Board of Supervisors for review and approval. If you have any questions or concerns regarding these applications,please call Allen Quynn, Project Manager, Surface Water Utility at 425-430-7247. Sincerely, Gregg Zim man, E. PBPW Administrator Enclosures cc: Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director Ron Straka,Surface Water Utility Supervisor Allen Quynn,Surface Water Utility Engineer H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA'I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation i ct\20 02-2005 t Wgton 980550 oW , tn REN T O N This paper contains 50%recycled material,301%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE t Project Name: SW 34"'Street Culvert Contact: Allen Quynn Replacement Project Applicant: City of Renton Title: Project Manager Principal Partners (if any): Address: 1055 S. Grady Way City of Renton Renton, WA 98055 Total Project Cost: $900,000 estimated Phone: 425-430-7247 KCD Funding Requested: $55,084.85 Fax: 425-430-7247 Project Start Date: April 2005 E-mail: a u nn ci.renton.wa.us Project End Date: Fall 2007 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): The purpose of this project is to replace the existing Springbrook Creek culvert crossing of SW 341h Street in Renton, Washington. The crossing consists of 4 existing,undersized corrugated metal (CMP)culverts that will be replaced with a new box culvert. Springbrook Creek is the main drainage channel for the 24-square mile Black River Basin that includes portions of the Cities of Renton, Kent,Tukwila and unincorporated King County. Springbrook Creek drains to the Black River Pump Station where flows are pumped into the Green River(see attached figures 6-1 and 6-2). The fisheries resources within Springbrook Creek include Chinook and Coho salmon, steelhead and cutthroat trout. The existing culverts were constructed in 1980 and are a major restriction of flows that contribute to the flooding problems in portions of the south valley during storm events. The project consists of the following elements: • Construction of a new box culvert including stream bypass. • Placement of spawning gravel in the bottom of the culvert. • Placement of woody debris on the sides of the channel. • Planting of riparian trees and shrubs along channel bank. 2. Project Objectives(Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts, provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): The project will accomplish the following objectives: • Eliminate flooding of the SW 34`h Street/Springbrook Creek crossing during the 100-yr storm event. • Lower upstream water levels,which will increase the capacity of local storm systems in Lind Avenue and SW 34`h Street. • Upsizing the SW 34`h Street culvert in conjunction with future pipe system improvements will help the City meet flood protection goals in the valley. • Provide improved fish passage and riparian habitat for salmonid migration. The following provides a brief description of how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.01: "To prepare and keep current a comprehensive long-range program recommending the conservation of all the renewable natural resources of the District. Such King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application programs shall be directed toward the best use of renewable natural resources and in a manner that will best meet the needs of the District and the state, taking into consideration, where appropriate, such uses as farming, grazing,timber supply, forest, parks, outdoor recreation, potable water supplies for urban and rural areas, water for agriculture, minimal flow, and industrial uses, watershed stabilization, control of soil erosion, retardation of water run-off, flood prevention and control, reservoirs and other water storage, restriction of developments of flood plains, protection of open space and scenery, preservation of natural beauty, protection of fish and wildlife, preservation of wilderness areas and wild rivers,the prevention or reduction of sedimentation and other pollution in rivers and other waters, and such location of highways, schools, housing developments, industries,airports and other facilities and structures as will fit the needs of the state and be consistent with the best uses of the renewable natural resources of the state. The program shall include an inventory of all renewable natural resources in the District, a compilation of current resource needs,projections of future resource requirements, priorities for various resource activities,projected timetables, descriptions of available alternatives, and provisions for coordination with other resource programs. Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project meets the above criteria by reducing flooding of SW 341h Street as well as upstream storm systems that discharge to Springbrook Creek. The new culvert will be designed to prevent flooding of the SW 341h Street crossing during the 100-yr storm event and lower tail water conditions for outfalls discharging upstream. The project will also help protect fish by lowering stream velocities during storm events through the new culvert to facilitate fish passage. KCD Strategic Plan Initiate: This proposal meets the strategic plan element 2,d (111)Support for Regional Conservation Initiatives, which states: "The District will join in regional conservation initiatives, lending its leadership and expertise on issues such as major river flooding,preserving and restoring fish habitat,protecting and restoring water quality in watersheds and general public conservation education programs in the region". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is one element of a series of projects recommended in the City of Renton's 1997 East Side Green River Watershed Plan and EIS (ESGRWP),which was a basin wide planning level study to identify projects that would help reduce the flooding in the Renton valley area. The ESGRWP identified the replacement of the SW 34`h Street crossing of Springbrook Creek to reduce upstream water levels and improve fish passage. As discussed under the previous criteria,the proposed project will eliminate flooding of SW 34th Street during the 100-yr storm as well as reduce flooding in local storm systems upstream that discharge to the creek. The project will also improve water quality and provide wildlife habitat with the addition of riparian plantings such as native shrubs and trees along the channel bank. In-stream woody debris will also be added to provide fish rearing and refuge habitat. Springbrook Creek is within Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA)9. The draft WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan identifies the need for improving fish passage riparian habitat and water quality to benefit Chinook salmon and other salmonids. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1 I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQt p King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Regional Funding Principles Established by the King County Regional Task Force: The project satisfies regional task force funding principles criteria 3,1(ii), which states: "Habitat restoration which enhances ecological significant fish runs". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is located on Springbrook Creek, which historically has poor water quality, particularly low dissolved oxygen due to high water temperatures. The basin, especially the valley floor has become highly urbanized with large commercial and industrial areas that directly discharge to Springbrook Creek. This project will address water quality by planting plants and trees along the channel bank that will help provide shade and help cool the creek during the summer months. Woody debris will also be incorporated into the project to provide channel rearing and refuge habitat for salmon. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Project activities include the following: • Replace existing undersized culverts with a new box culvert to increase conveyance capacity and reduce flooding of SW 34"' Street and upstream storm pipe systems. • Construct stream bypass during provide dewatering of groundwater during construction. • Relocate utilities. • Provide a more natural and better-lined streambed to enhance fish passage. This includes adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert. • Provide riparian habitat planting including a mix of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Measurable Results include: • After project construction, observe lower water surface elevations in the channel upstream of SW 34`h Street during high flow events. • A year after construction complete,observe the establishment of native riparian plants in areas planted as part of project restoration. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Total Cit I of Renton Salaries and Benefits Travel/Meals/Mileage Office/Field Supplies Contracted/Professional $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 Services Land Acquisition Permits Other TOTAL $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. H:Tile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.docWQtp King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Funding will be acknowledged, reported and tracked using the State of Washington Accounting and Reporting System or"BARS". The use of taxpayer funds provided through the King Conservation District for the above-described projects will be acknowledged through newspaper articles,websites or other information released during project implementation. Attachments Gregg Zi rman Date PBPW Ad str �or HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA]]-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\]003 City Correspondencc\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 1 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Project Name: Black River Channel Native Contact: Doris Yepez Plant Restoration Project _ Applicant: Doris Yepez Title: Project Coordinator Phase 1 Fiscal Agent: Seattle Audubon Society Phase 2 Fiscal Agent: Duwamish Tribe Principal Partners (if any): Address: 16444 SE 135th St. City of Renton Renton,WA 98059 Friends of Black River Herons Forever Duwamish Tribe Total Project Cost: $53,559.00 Phone: 425 891-0730 KCD Funding Requested: $4,869.00 Fax: 425 917-0872 Project Start Date: 9/29/2004 E-mail: dorisdandeliongyahoo.com Project End Date: Spring 2008 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): There are two phases to the Black River Channel Restoration Project, Phase I and Phase 2, and the funding requested covers both Phases. The goals for both Phases are to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, and develop community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. Phase 1 began September 29,2004,and concludes in Spring 2007 with a commitment to maintain and monitor the restoration site for two years. The restoration area for Phase I is .83 of an acre in size and located on the south bank of the Black River Channel, off of Monster Road SW, adjacent and immediately downstream from the DNRP Black River Pump Station and upstream from the Monster Road Bridge. Much of the work has been completed to date and included: 1. The removal of invasive plants on the top 20 ft. of the riverbank and in the adjoining field. 2. The removal of 11 ecology blocks left on the property. 3. Scarification of the soil to loosen the gravelly soil on half of the field area. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger. 5. Soil amendments. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs. 7. Installation of a drip irrigation system to increase the survival rate of the newly planted native vegetation. What remains is the monitoring and maintenance of the restoration site for the two year committed period. Phase 2 will begin in Fall 2005 and will conclude Spring 2008. Phase 2 is on the south bank as well,but immediately upstream from, and adjacent to,the DNRP Black River Pump Station. The restoration area is approximately 'h acre in size. As in Phase 1,the goal is to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington,as well as expand community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. The new site will also be monitored and maintained for two years. 2. Project Objectives(Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts,provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\]003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The project objectives are: • Provide shade, food sources and habitat improvements for the fish and wildlife through the removal of invasive weeds and the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs. • Acquaint the community and students with the Black River. • Educate the community and students about the Black River Channel Restoration Project and the Black River watershed, forest and channel ecosystem. • Involve the community and students in the restoration work. The following provides a brief description of specifically how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.450: "Watershed restoration projects--Intent. The legislature.declares that it is the goal of the state of Washington to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular,fish and wildlife and their habitat. It is further the policy of the state insofar as possible to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals." Description of how this project meets the first part of the criteria"to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and,in particular,fish and wildlife and their habitat": This project restores the riparian habitat along the Black River Channel and adjoining field, and improves the fish and wildlife habitat. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs restores the area to its more natural state. In addition,the native trees planted along the riverbank will provide shade that will keep the temperatures of the water at a more desirable level for salmonids. The debris from the trees and shrubs, leaves falling,will also provide a source of food for the fish; and fallen trees will act as LWD, (Large Woody Debris),which give salmon areas to rest and spawn.The field area,with the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs, will provide a buffer from the noise and pollution of the street,as well as provide a diversity of food sources for the other wildlife, producing berries and flowers at different times of year. Also, once grown in,the vegetation will provide more habitat areas for the wildlife. Description of how this project meets the second part of the criteria"to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals": During Phase 1,there were four community events: one day for planting,two others for mulching and weeding,and the last was the installation of the drip irrigation system.Numerous groups helped with these tasks including Renton Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, Campfire Girls,Herons Forever members,Friends of Black River,Duwamish tribal members, Sierra Club members,Boeing volunteers and the Briarwood Student Leadership Group. The same volunteer organizations will be asked to help with Phase 2 in order to increase the groups' sense of connection and commitment to the Black River and to give them the opportunity to see the growth and progress made through their participation in the restoration tasks during Phase 1. KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria As stated in the KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria, Section b ii): "Promoting Natural Habitat Restoration. The District will provide information and assistance to landowners, businesses, and other H:\File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application citizens in rural and urban areas on the preservation and restoration of natural habitats including the creation of low-maintenance native plant habitats that conserve water and are friendly to wildlife, eco- landscaping, establishing naturescaping demonstration sites, intrusive species management and community stewardship". Description of how this project meets this criteria: The restoration work included, in Phase 1,the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field area,as well as the removal of other invasive shrubs such as the Butterfly bush. Maintenance of the restoration site includes weeding, specifically focusing on removing the new growth of Himalayan blackberries and Butterfly bush, and removing other weeds on the site that are on the Washington State and/or King County Noxious Weed List, namely,Tansy ragwort, Bull thistle and Oxeye daisy. Other invasive weeds will be removed as needed. Phase 2 also calls for the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field areas, and the removal of other noxious weeds present,which include Japanese knotweed. During Phase 1,community stewardship has been developed through the involvement of the different volunteer organizations in the restoration tasks and in the presentation of the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to four different groups. As stated in the KCD Strategic Initiative Section d, i): "Population Growth and Increased Urbanization. The District will actively promote workable solutions that help minimize the effects of population growth and increased urbanization on the natural environment." Description of how this project meets these criteria: When the planted native trees get larger,they will create a dense wooded area, a small forest, in a highly urbanized setting. The planting of trees in urban areas is very beneficial to the environment. Trees absorb contaminants, control erosion,reduce storm- water run-off by absorbing water through their roots,clean the air, and as stated above, are beneficial to the fish and wildlife by providing more shade, additional food sources and habitat. The trees,with the falling of large wooded debris, also enhance our stream systems. The grassy, field area that was part of the restoration site in Phase I was under laid with gravel to accommodate the trucks when the Black River Pump Station was built. One of the restoration tasks, during Phase 1, included ripping up the gravelly field and planting native trees, shrubs and forbs. Mulch was also added throughout the field area. The addition of mulch, and the decomposition of native vegetation in the future,will enrich the soil and help rebuild it. KCD Regional Funding Principles As stated in the#3 KCD Regional Funding Principles, iv),"Water quality and watershed restoration and protection support services such as coordination of monitoring(data collection, studies,evaluation)and public education programs". Description of how this project meets this criterion: During Phase 2,community involvement will expand to include the Renton schools and other local schools. Presently,there are two Renton schools,Lindbergh High School and Black River High School,which have provided written commitments to involve their students in hands-on learning at the Black River, as well as introducing a Black River component into their science curriculum.The Black River Riparian Forest,Channel and restoration areas will be used as a living laboratory for students to learn about scientific methods and concepts and to learn about the Black River and its components. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The Black River Restoration Project will also be included as an option in a tour sponsored by the King County Waste Treatment program, Wheels to Water. A visit to the South Treatment Plant will include a tour of the Black River and the opportunity to participate in restoration tasks or learn about the history and components of the Black River through a walking tour of the Forest,Channel and restoration sites. In addition to the above,the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation shown to different groups during Phase 1, helped educate the public about the restoration work and the Black River. The PowerPoint presentations will also be shown to new groups participating in Phase 2. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Phase 1: 1. Removal of invasive weeds: Himalayan blackberries were rampant on the riverbank and on a small vegetation island in the middle of the field. There were a few other invasives such as the Butterfly bush, but the Himalayan blackberry was the predominant invasive weed with a 50- 60%ground cover on the riverbank and a 35%ground cover on the island. Most of the invasive blackberries on the restoration site have been eradicated through the cutting and grubbing of the blackberries. Earthcorps was hired to cut and grub the blackberries on the top 20 ft. of the bank. Volunteers and salaried crew have removed the remainder of the blackberries on the island, and have been tackling the new growth of the Himalayan blackberry that is popping up throughout the site. A salaried person has also been cutting blackberries on the lower part of the bank, beyond the 20 ft., and throughout the site. 2. Removal of ecology blocks: There were 11 ecology blocks on the site before the project began. These have all been removed with the help of King County roads crew. 3. Ripping up of the gravelly field: Before the restoration work,the entire field area was grown over with grass and under laid with gravel that was deposited when the Black River Pump Station was built. It was almost impossible to dig into the field to plant native vegetation since the ground was so compacted. Half of the gravelly field was ripped up with the use of a backhoe,to allow for planting,and now the soil is looser. Thrushes were observed, on at least two different occasions,pecking at the soil since it has been loosened. The backhoe also removed the other invasive shrubs that were in the island. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger: In the other half of the gravelly field,20 rows of planting holes were dug with an auger. The field area is being used as a test site to see which side produces better results,the augured field area or the area where the backhoe ripped up the gravel and grass. 5. Soil amendments: Approximately 60 cubic yards of mulch was spread throughout the field area of the restoration site beginning January 2005 through May 2005. The mulch helps with weed control; helps keep some moisture close to the newly planted native vegetation,and will enhance the soil as it decays. The soil in the field area is nutrient poor, and some plants are in need of fertilizer. Biosolids are in the process of being purchased from the South Waste Treatment Plant to place around the plants that need some fertilizing. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs: Most of the native plants were planted in January 2005. Some were planted in February 2005, and approximately 10 more were donated and planted in May 2005. There has been less than a 2%mortality rate,and those were mostly the Pacific madrones,which have the reputation of being difficult to plant. 7. Installation of the drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system was installed in April 2005. A drip system is crucial at this site,especially in the field area,since the soil is very well-drained and does not retain water.A few of the native plants had yellowed a little with the early heat spell in February/March,but once the drip irrigation system was running,the plants regained their healthy, green look. The drip irrigation system is attached to the faucet at the Pump Station HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 5 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application and is turned on at least 4 times a week by the Pump Station crew, and occasionally on hot and dry weekends, by the restoration project coordinator. 8. Community involvement: The community has shown interest and support,evidenced with the large numbers of participants. For two of the community activity days, there were over 50 volunteers helping on each of those days. 9. Monitoring and maintenance: The project is being monitored and maintained at least twice a month. Partners to the grant, Herons Forever and Friends of Black River members, are helping with the maintenance and monitoring. Monitoring includes tracking the condition of the native vegetation,the growth of the invasive weeds,checking the drip irrigation system and noting any wildlife in the area. Maintenance includes protecting the native vegetation from being eaten, if necessary; removing the invasive weeds by either weed whacking,or manually cutting then grubbing, as in the case of the blackberries; replacing dead native vegetation and repairing, if necessary, the drip irrigation system.Monitoring and maintenance is very important in helping the native plants thrive as well as ensuring that they will not be out competed by the invasive weeds or eaten by wildlife. The project activities and measurable results for Phase 2 include: 1. Planning and organizing: A Scope of Work Budget for King County needs to be completed before December 2005. Dates for the different restoration tasks need to be set, vendors need to be contacted, materials need to be purchased, subcontractors need to be lined up, requests for payments and other paperwork need to be submitted to King County throughout the project. Other grant paperwork needs to be completed including a report to KCD. Reports are submitted to partners on a regular basis. Media will be solicited for the various community events. Planning and organizing is critical for the project to run smoothly and to get the needed tasks done. 2. Contacting different volunteer organizations: Different volunteer organizations will be contacted to help with the native planting,mulching and installation of the drip irrigation system. Involving the community will develop community stewardship of the Black River. We will attempt to involve the same organizations as last year,to strengthen community stewardship,and contact new groups as well. The new groups will be shown the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to acquaint them with the Black River and to build some desire and enthusiasm to help with the restoration tasks. 3. Contacting Lindbergh and Black River High Schools to set up dates for student participation in the restoration project and discuss the specifics of the addition of the Black River into the science curriculum. 4. Developing a tour schedule with the Wheels to Water Program and writing up an oral presentation for the tour. 5. Removing invasive weeds: The invasive weeds account for at least 90%of the present groundcover, and most of the weeds are Himalayan blackberry. The weeds need to be removed in order to plant native vegetation.The roots of the weeds will be removed to inhibit the return growth of the weeds. The abundant Himalayan blackberries create a monoculture with a food source that has limited value since it is not eaten by much of the wildlife. 6. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs: Approximately 500 trees, shrubs and forbs will be planted with numerous species of each.Native vegetation will enhance the area by providing food sources, shade and habitat for the wildlife; and a diversity of native vegetation will provide a variety of food and habitat sources.Native trees will also control erosion, storm-water run-off, clean the air and absorb contaminants in the soil. 7. Soil amendments: Mulch will be added around the areas where the native vegetation is planted. Mulch will help retain the moisture in the soil,control weeds as well as enrich the soil as it decays. A natural fertilizer, such as biosolids,will be added as necessary. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants0003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 6 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 8. Installing a drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system will keep the native vegetation hydrated and increase their chance of survival. Watering is critical especially during the area's dry summer months. 9. Maintenance and monitoring of the restoration site: Monitoring includes checking and recording the condition of the native plants, the drip irrigation system,the growth of the invasive weeds and wildlife activity. Maintenance involves repairing the drip irrigation system,removing the growing weeds, replacing dead native plants and protecting the native plants from being eaten by wildlife. Frequent maintenance and monitoring will help keep the invasive growth from getting out of control and help insure the successful growth of the native vegetation as well as catch any other problems that come up. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Other Total King County Funds Waterworks (specify) Grant Salaries and Benefits $1,034 $14,000 $15,034 Travel/Meals/Mileage $253 $25043 $2,296 Office/Field Supplies $3,489 $12,728 $16,217 Contracted/Professional $15,13 8 $15,13 8 Services Land Acquisition Permits $93 97 190 Other(Fiscal Agents) $4,684 $4,684 TOTAL 1 $4,869 1 $48,690 1 $53,559 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. The KCD contribution will be noted on the signs that will be placed at the two restoration sites upon the termination of the project. King County has been advised that KCD funds will potentially be the source of the cash match for the project for both phases. Any newspaper articles or photos will acknowledge KCD as a contributor to the project. KCD will be acknowledged as a contributor and partner in the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation. KCD will also be mentioned and acknowledged in other correspondence related to the project. me�- , regg Zi er n,P. Date PBPW Ad .strator HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc _ _�--- East Side Goen River Water C�uality Black River King Chounty - Watershed Bundary � •,.' Management Plan —t Study Area ••• �•' �/ Ole.�' "" ; �• , 00, rj- ee ,•'� L. -� • •••• � ire Panther Lake I I •.' •, _ Q o� I I I I •• 405 L r LKing Count Garrison i I .•••• t°Ren n, Creek I i ' I I � Renton rj King County J • r�• Springbrook•fir. L.—. —.-J �•''- rj Valley Area Cn _ 167 Kent f: Springbrook Creek East __Valley Road f � ' 1 Springbrook Creel,: j ,♦ `- Renton Mill 167 Sri �--•—•—•- -•—•---'� Tukwila - ee Black River ` , i een Kent co j L---- 1 I .00e TUk 181 — 181 � - - - --- _._.A_. Pump Station i wi/° ; � • N �. L._.J N Kent Tukwila , Kent � —� � ✓,• �. ` Lagoons a � rj l I 1 _5 Riper EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER WATERSHED PROJECT s _ j`• 0 3000 6000 l FIGURE 6-1 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET \ Y , PROJECT AREA t r - _ x . , RR�S s= 1 a SIAITHE ,. T - _ RS � /- -----..... :- - ri E M - -- - ----- RE N ON ..,> -------------- .-- .......... p� s SHOPPING Q ` i� g8 , r S g , . . -- RD 6 �t '.CENTER �Bo MORRIS AV :- N �' ROLLING R 'I"-- -- \ �P WHIT- - It NG HI S } HIT L - CREEK 0 _. oCo - z _ . �': SHATTUCK SHATTUCK / - - D-:�S Av "'' VALLEY �= _... I - A N; TALBOT C( R WETLAND Q .... iq7 } ER CREEK Q GENERAL . _ GL _ _ ___ ...._..__...--_-_:.:_- - .... _... - HOSPITAL � _� .......... -_- - s--�i y V. E. _Uj ALLB z d - - -\ - x48BOX gpw -167 - -- - - --- _ w rrryry , O ♦:' -. o E VALLEY RD $ - - VALLEY --...._..... _ N w ,4 x ::a :----- ------ _ -— N - , ,a a- A t- t i ; - • y , .v as LIND 60* ` , S --- - - - y -D: 5 i �< V SW Q v • -- _ - - ---- € Ivert cn SW 3_ 4 Street Cu Replacement Projectlb SENECA N=_' N -co . , Y 1 21 w N- SCALE 1w=1000' THOMAS - SW- -- ..._.... �., AV , : ':• � N i Ott F.r �: 1'— f , ,i f- _ 1— L- , :w ..--.......__.__.__- _.._. P _ ....: ?i N DWELL AV SW � •�°: = .. �€ - � > �N CONNECTING N : a : o: I CHANNEL PROJECT - � (COMPLETED . -- _ -- _... . _ _......---- - - - f _.].8......_. N : : 15, ,. 95) ;- _ °4 OAKESDALE AV SW e. . , 54 ,- t' Fz y N LEGEND 36 `�'+ VALLEY AREA 36 (STUDY AREA) 36' DIAMETER STORM DRAIN m g t� C, co --► STREAM/DRAINAGE CHANNEL F � CULVERT(S) 1 : \ _ _ JACKSON SW # 'Y r _ _ --- __ -__ __ - PUMP `STATION : - - - _ _ CREEK t L FLOOD WATER _ _ STORAGE POND -- `> __..._. R - ----- _... - \ ."._., N CITY ,. RR ♦ t TUKWILA ♦„ a �'+ -• ENTO LIMITS \ k �/ f f f/ i�R R� � ` - a �. .:,-__...____-----------• _ f .y- . .� + _.._. ------- ------ ._—_--- EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER -t BLACK•, �\ _ ---- g WEST ------ `+ WATERSHED PROJECT , VALLEY RIVER � HINY --.,�•�.� - r • LJ PUMP \ - �;"• \i;; /, RENTON VALLEY AREA x STATION t EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO GREEN-DUWAMISH4__ RIVER " wn King Conservation District — City of Auburn Partnership Assessment Funds and Projects Summary of Assessment Funds 1994 — 2006 Assessments $121,471.83 2007 Assessments Collected (6/30/07) 12,853.88 Amount Utilized to Date 8,398.96 Amount Available Today $ 125,926.75 Additional Estimated 2007 Assessments 9,750.55 Amount Available 12/31/07 $ 135,677.30 Assessment Funded Grants Awarded through City Partnership • Grant, December 1995 - North Central Storm Drainage Improvement ($2,714.74) • Grant, May 1996 - North Central Storm Drainage Improvement ($3,644.62) Assessment Funded Grants Awarded through WRIA 9 Partnership • Grant, June 2005, Olson Creek Habitat Restoration ($32,000.00) • Grant, June 2007, Mill Creek Restoration ($20,000.00) Assessment Funded KCD Contracts • Services Contract, 1994, Fish-Friendly Car Washing Brochure, Native Plants for Wildlife Enhancement Brochure, W. Auburn HS EE Event ($2,040.00) King Conservation District — City of Bellevue Partnership Assessment Funds and Projects Summary of Assessment Funds 1994 — 2006 Assessments $ 438,537.68 2007 Assessments Collected (6/30/07) 64,093.00 Amount Utilized to Date 444,222.17 Amount Available Today $ 58,408.51 Additional Estimated 2007 Assessments 12,212.60 Amount Available 12/31/07 $ 70,621 .11 Assessment Funded Grants Awarded through City Partnership • Grant, 1994-1995, Stream Team ($13,389.83) • Grant, 1996, Stream Team ($13,900.39) • Grant,1997-1998, Stream Team ($14,294.37) • Grant,1999-2000, Stream Team ($49,430.17) • Grant, 2003, Salmon Spawner Surveys ($25,000.00) • Grant, 2005, Pollution Source Control Program ($16,000.00) • Grant, 2005, Pollution Source Control Incentive Program ($50,000.00) • Grant, 2005, Bellevue LID Pilot Project Manual ($70,000.00) • Grant, 2005, Riparian Restoration Incentive Program ($50,000.00) • Grant, 2005, Beaver Management Program ($48,000.00) • Grant, 2007, Beaver Management Implementation ($48,000.00) • Grant, 2007, Salmon Surveys ($30,375.00) • Grant, 2007, Maintenance Standards for New Water Quality BMPs ($38,000.00) Assessment Funded Grants Awarded through WRIA 8 Partnership • Grant, 2000, Kelsey Creek Fish Ladder ($50,000.00) • Grant, 2006, Kelsey Creek Stream Restoration ($94,000.00) King Conservation District — City of Renton Partnership Assessment Funds and Projects Summary of Assessment Funds 1994 — 2006 Assessments $180,681.45 2007 Assessments Collected (6/30/07) 21,492.63 Amount Utilized to Date 137,054.69 Amount Available Today $ 65,119.39 Additional Estimated 2007 Assessments 16,595.45 Amount Available 12/31/07 $ 81,714.84 Assessment Funded Grants Awarded through City Partnership • Grant, 1998, Springbrook Creek Channel Improvement, Wetland Mitigation Bank Project ($11,549.19) • Grant, 2002, Edmonds Ave. Pocket Park ($5,000) • Grant, 2002, May Creek Project ($45,978) • Grant, 2006, SW 34th St Culvert Replacement Project ($55,084.85) • Grant, January 2006, Black River Watershed Alliance Channel Native Plant Restoration ($4,869.00) Assessment Funded Grants Awarded through WRIA 9 Partnership • Grant, 2007, Upper Springbrook Creek Restoration ($50,000.00) Assessment Funded KCD Contracts • Contract, 1995-1996 ($11,021.65) • Contract, 2001-2002, Black River Riparian Forest Buffer Enhancement Plan ($3,552) KCD Operating Budget Applied to Projects in City of Renton • Service, 2002-2004 Black River Riparian Forest Buffer Enhancement Projects ($12,000) King Conservation District Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Grant Program Grants Awarded to Projects in Partnership with Member Jurisdictions 1994 through October 4, 2007 Entity Funded Project Name Amount City of Algona Acquisition of Parcel No.362104-9002 12,000.00 City of Auburn North Central Storm Drainage Improvement,PI 2,714.34 City of Auburn North Central Storm Drainage Improvement,PII 3,644.62 City of Beaux Arts Storm Drain Stenciling _49.41 City of Beaux-Arts Storm Drain Stenciling 49.20 City of Beaux Arts Storm Drain Stenciling — 275.00 City of Beaux Arts Milfoil Control Project 181.23 City of Bellevue Stream Team 1994-1995 13,389.83 City of Bellevue Stream Team 1996 13,900.39 City of Bellevue Stream Team 1997-1998 _ 14,294.37 City of Bellevue Stream Team 1999-2000 37,924.65 City of Bellevue Maintenance Standards for New Water Quality BMPs 38,000.00 City of Bellevue Salmon Survey 30,375.00 City of Bellevue Beaver Management Implementation 48,000.00 City of Bellevue 2003 Spawner Surveys 25,000.00 City of Bellevue Beaver Management 37,337.93 City of Bellevue LID Pilot Project Manual 70,000.00 City of Bellevue Pollution Source Control Education Program 16,000.00 City of Bellevue Pollution Source Control Incentive Program 50,000.00 City of Bellevue Riparian Restoration Incentive Program 50,000.00 City of Black Diamond-King CD Rock Creek Culvert Replacement Project 13,759.51 City of Bothell 1998 Sammamish Releaf Project 7,630.90 City of Burien Eagle Landing Park Interpretation&Reforestation 30,000.00 City of Burien Seahurst Nearshore Revegetation Project 30,000.00 City of Carnation Carnation Farmers Market 4,650.00 City of Clyde Hill __ 1995 Arbor Day Native Plants 418.95 City of Clyde Hill 1996 Arbor Day Native Plants 490.00 City of Clyde Hill 1998 Arbor Day Native Plants 446.25 City of Clyde Hill 1999 Arbor Day Celebration 905.00 City of Clyde Hill 2000 Arbor Day Celebration 905.00 City of Clyde Hill _ 2001 Arbor Day Celebration 905.00 City of Clyde Hill 2002 Arbor Day Celebration 1,300.00 City of Clyde Hill 2003 Arbor Day Celebration 1,300.00 City of Clyde Hill 2004 Arbor Day Celebration 1,500.00 City of Clyde Hill 2005 Arbor Day Celebration 1,400.00 City of Clyde Hill 2006 Arbor Day Celebration 1,300.00 City of Clyde Hill _ 2007 Arbor Day Celebration _ _ 1,500.00 City of Covington Jenkins Creek Park Tree Restoration 7,800.00 City of Des Moines Beach Park Stream Restoration 1,802.00 City of Duvall-King CD _Coe Clemmons Creek Beaver Baffle Project _ 952.00 City of Duvall-King CD _Bare Root Plant 661.46 City of Duvall Coe Clemmons Creek Restoration Project 8,000.00 City of Federal Way-King CD Brook Lake Community Club Stream Restoration Project PI _ _ _ 10,649.13 City of Federal Way Brook Lake Community Club Stream Restoration Project Pil 6,807.31 City of Federal Way-King CD Hylebose Creek Stream&Buffer Enhancement Project 15,203.15 City of Federal Way Hylebose Creek Public Outreach&Monitoring Program 23,791.00 City of Issaquah-King CID Bare Root Plants 1,200.25 City of Issaquah Issaquah Habitat Restoration-2006 _ _ 15,199.00 City of Issaquah Issaquah Restoration Program-2002 7,875.93 City of Issaquah _ Issaquah Habitat Restoration Monitoring and Maintenance _ 9,200.00 City of Issaquah Issaquah Restoration Stewardship Program-2004 19,250.00 City of Kenmore Wildcliffe Shores Sammamish River Restoration Project 12,500.00 City of Kent-King CD 1998 Wetland Plants 11,560.25 City of Kent-King CD 1999 Bareroot Plants 1,629.00 - - - - _ _. - -- - - --- - - City of Kent-King CD Green River Natural Area Wetland Monitoring Protocol&Surveys 16,655.88 City of Kent-King CD 2000 Wetland Plants 445.26 City of Kent-King CD 2000 Bareroot Plants 1,623.57 City of Kent-King CID 2001 Bareroot Plants 4,466.72 City of Kent-King CD 2002 Bareroot Plants 2,822.27 City of Kent-King CD 2003 Bareroot Plants 2,709.12 City of Kent-King CD 2004 Bareroot Plants 5,141.89 City of Kent-King CD 2005 Bareroot Plants 5,629.31 City of Kent Campus Park Reforestation Project 950.00 City of Kent Canterbury Retention Pond Planting 10,170.58 City of Kent Clark Lake Forest Management Plan 3,360.00 City of Kent Clark Lake Inlet Restoration PI 8,581.61 City of Kent Clark Lake Inlet Restoration PH 16,707.50 City of Kent _ East Hill Retention Pond _ 2,383.88 City of Kent Glenn Nelson Forest Management 5,230.00 City of Kent Green River Greenbelt Planting Ph 1 3,373.33 City of Kent Green River Greenbelt Planting Ph II 2,342.87 City of Kent Green River Trailhead Improvement Project at Boeing Rock 697.29 City of Kent Green River Trailhead Improvement Project _ 1,993.94 City of Kent Scenic Hill Park Urban Forestry Plan 3,710.00 City of Kent Service Club Ballfields Retention Pond Planting 11,339.91 City of Kent-King CD 2006 Bareroot Plants 5,022.21 City of Kent-Kin_g CD 2007 Bareroot Plants _ _4,636.69 City of Kirkland Surface Water Utility Survey Team Assistance 1,283.59 City of Kirkland Quincosis Stream Restoration 2,312.00 City of Kirkland Bridle Trails Neighborhood Horses for Clean Water Program 4,000.00 Ci of Kirkland Everest Creek Restoration 10,000.00 City of Kirkland Green Kirkland 38,260.00 City of Kirkland Kirkland Youth Work Program 32,039.00 City of Kirkland NE 63rd Street Ravine Stabilization Project -- 52,000.00 City of Lake Forest Park Blue Heron Park Phase 2 3,369.46 City of Lake Forest Park Hillside Creek Restoration Project 469.40 City of Lake Forest Park Hillside Creek Restoration Project 1,017.10 City of Lake Forest Park-King CD Heron Park PI Knotweed Control Project 4,482.15 City of Lake Forest Park McAleer Creek Project 9,431.00 City of Maple Valley Resource Documentation 2,000.00 City of Medina Fairweather Nature Preserve 506.97 City of Medina Fairweather Nature Preserve 1995-96 518.18 City of Mercer Island-King CD 1994-1995 Project 3,353.48 City of Mercer Island-King CD Ellis Park Pond Enhancement 7,811.04 City of Mercer Island Mercer View Community Center Demonstration Project 45,000.00 City of Redmond-King CD Peters Creek Restoration Project 1998 15,172.63 City of Redmond-King CD Grasslawn Park Enhancement Plan 1999 412.22 City of Redmond Salmon Friendly Water Conservation Demo Garden App II 139,000.00 City of Renton 1994 Wetland Mitigation,Springbrook Creek,Future Stream Enhancement Proj 5,456.17 City of Renton 1995 Wetland Mitigation,Springbrook Creek,Future Stream Enhancement Proj 5,565.48 City of Renton Springbrook Creek Channel Improvement and Wetland Mitigation Project 11,549.19 City of Renton-King CD Black River Riparian Forest Buffer Enhancement Plan 3,552.00 City of Renton Edmonds Avenue Pocket Park 5,000.00 City of Renton May Creek Basin Action Plan Implementation 45,978.00 City of Renton SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project 55,084.85 City of Renton-Black River Watershed Black River Channel Native Plant Restoration Project PI&PH 4,869.00 City of Sammamish Zaccuse Creek Daylighting 30,000.00 City of Sea Tac 188th Street Landscaping Project 23,000.00 City of Seattle Bathymetric LiDAR 40,000.00 City of Seattle Duwamish Source Control Program Database Design 30,365.00 City of Seattle Green Roof Demonstration Project 50,000.00 City of Seattle In stream Flows Science and Management Conference 25,000.00 City of Seattle Lower Duwamish Outfall Survey 29,967.00 City of Seattle Luna Park Beach Restoration 70,000.00 City of Seattle Salmon Bay Natural Area Restoration Phase 2 102,300.00 City of Seattle Research Framework for Juvenile Salmonid Survival in WRIA 9 25,000.00 City of Seattle Chinook Salmon Distribution&Habitat Productivity Study 41,506.94 City of Seattle Seattle/W RIA 9 Marine Nearshore Inventory(Seattle Portion) 20,000.00 City of Seattle STEP 1995 72,244.38 City of Seattle _ STEP 1996 __ __ 72,726.86 City of Seattle STEP 1997 71,329.10 City of Seattle STEP 1998 73,362.84 City of Seattle GCS 1999 73,362.84 City of Seattle GCS 2001-2002 89,097.50 City of Seattle GCS 2000 78,805.76 City of Seattle ESA ED 100,000.00 City of Seattle SCAP 1994 71,681.62 City of Seattle Olympic Sculpture Park Post Construction Monitoring 43,827.00 City of Seattle Salmonid Pre-Spawn Mortality Investigation 40,000.00 City of Seattle-Fauntleroy Community Fauntleroy Creek Restoration 19,300.00 City of Seattle Dept of Transportation 1st Ave South Duwamish Boat Ramp Bank Improvement 19,688.00 -- - -- - -— City of Seattle Parks&Recreation Forest Stewards Training Program 63,000.00 City of Seattle PUD Wetland Assessment&Management Program Ph 1 21,870.00 City of Seattle,Parks&Recreation Luna Park Seawall Replacement 43,000.00 City of Seattle,Seattle Public Utilities 2002/2003 Grant Central Station 98,000.00 City of Seattle,Seattle Public Utilities 2003 Grant Central Station 100,000.00 -City of Seattle,Seattle Public Utilities 2004 Grant Central Station 100,000.00 City of Seattle,Seattle Public Utilities 2005 Grant Central Station 100,000.00 City of Seattle,Seattle Public Utilities Grants Central Station 1999 _ _ _ 73,362.84 City of Seattle,Seattle Public Utilities Grants Central Station 2000 78,805.76 City of Seattle,Seattle Public Utilities Grants Central Station 2001 89,097.50 City of Seattle,Seattle Public Utilities Maple Leaf Reach Restoration 35,000.00 City of Shoreline Stream Inventory and Assessment 61,600.00 City of Tukwila Grandmother's Hill Acquisition Project 7,500.00 City of Woodinville Wetland Delineation Study 14,000.00 King County 1995 Agriculture Program _ _ 77,384.00 King County 1996 Agriculture Program 65,000.00 King County-King CD King CD Farm Planning Services 83,474.00 King County 1997 Agriculture Program 70,206.53 King County 1998 Agriculture Program 152,711.17 King County_ 1999 King County Ag Program 145,809,20 King County 2000 King County Ag Program 152,711.00 King County 2001 King County Ag Program 110,000.00 King County 2002 King County Ag Program 144,000.00 King County _ 2003 King County Ag Program 148,545.00 King County 2004 King County Ag Program 130,407.36 King Count __ _ 2005 King County Ag Program 134,000.00 King County 2006 King County Ag Program 280,000.00 5,237,163.00 � 7 i CAG-05-203 AGREEMENT FOR AWARD OF NONCOMPETITIVE GRANT City of Renton This Agreement is made between the King Conservation District Number 9, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 935 Powell Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 (referred to herein as "District"), and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 1055 South Grady Way, Renton Washington 98055 (referred to herein as "Recipient"), for the purposes set forth herein. SECTION 1. RECITALS 1.1 Whereas, the District is a special purpose district organized and existing under authority of Chapter 89.08 RCW. The District engages in and provides certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and 1.2 Whereas, on December 15, 2000, the Metropolitan King County Council enacted King County Ordinance No. 14016 which, among other things, provides for the distribution of noncompetitive grant funds from a portion of the special assessments imposed by King County Ordinance No. 14016 and collected by the District pursuant to Chapter 89.08 RCW; and 1.3 Whereas, on November 19, 1998, the District adopted Resolution No. 98-20 relating to the policy and procedures governing the District's award of any noncompetitive grants authorized by King County; and 1.4 Whereas, the District has reviewed the grant application submitted by Recipient and has determined that the application meets the requirements of Chapter 89.08 RCW and the District's policy and procedures for awarding noncompetitive grants; and 1.5 Whereas, the District and Recipient desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of establishing the terms and conditions relating to the District's award of a noncompetitive grant to Recipient. SECTION 2. AGREEMENT 2.1 The District agrees to award Recipient a grant in the total amount of Fifty-five thousand eighty-four dollars and 85 cents ($55,084.85) ($10,618.51 from 2002 Assessments, $16,271.58 from 2003 Assessments, $16,656.05 from 2004 Assessments, and $11,538.71 from 2005 Assessments). Grant funds shall be used by Recipient solely for the performance of the work described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The District shall pay the grant funds to Recipient in accordance with the following paragraphs. 2.1.1 Grant funds from 2002, 2003, and 2004 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient within five (5) business days after District's receipt of a fully executed Agreement. - 1 - 2.1.2 Grant funds from 2005 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient on or before January 31, 2005, provided that such funds have been collected and received by the District and thereafter in quarterly installments as funds are received. 2.2 Recipient represents and warrants that it will only use the grant funds for the work described in Exhibit A, which may be amended by the parties pursuant to Paragraph 3.3 of the Agreement. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized work. Further,Recipient agrees to return to the District any grant funds that are not expended and/or remain after completion of the work covered by this Agreement. 2.3 Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the grant funds may only be expended on work which shall be entirely within the District's jurisdictional boundaries. The following municipal entities are not within the District's jurisdictional boundaries: Enumclaw, Federal Way, Milton, Pacific, and Skykomish. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for work performed outside the District's jurisdictional boundaries. 2.4 In the event the scope of work authorized by this Agreement includes the use of grant funds to purchase houses located on real property within a flood hazard area, Recipient acknowledges and agrees that grant funds may only be used for such purposes if the houses to be purchased were constructed before floodplain mapping or sensitive areas regulations were in place for that area. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized purposes. 2.5 Recipient shall be required to provide the District with biannual financial and project progress reports, along with an annual summary report. Financial and project reports shall be due May 31 and November 30 each year. The Recipient shall also be required to submit to the District a final report which documents the Recipient's completion of the work in conformance with this Agreement within thirty(30) days after the completion of the work. The final report shall, among other things, summarize the project's successes and shall address the regional benefits accomplished by the work. The final report shall also identify any obstacles or challenges which were encountered during the work, along with general recommendations regarding ways to avoid such obstacles or challenges in the future. If requested, Recipient agrees to provide the District with additional financial or progress reports from time to time, at reasonable intervals. 2.6 Recipient's expenditures of grant funds shall be separately identified in the Recipient's accounting records. If requested, Recipient shall comply with other reasonable requests made by the District with respect to the manner in which project expenditures are tracked and accounted for in Recipient's accounting books and records. Recipient shall maintain such records of expenditures as may be necessary to conform to generally accepted accounting principals and to meet the requirements of all applicable state and federal laws. - 2 - 2.7 Recipient shall be required to track project expenses using the Budget Accounting and Reporting System for the State of Washington ("BARS"). 2.8 The District or its representative shall have the right from time to time, at reasonable intervals, to audit the Recipient's books and records in order to verify compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Recipient shall cooperate with the District in any such audit. 2.9 Recipient shall retain all accounting records and project files relating to this Agreement in accordance with criteria established in the Revised Code of Washington and the Washington State Archivist. 2.10 Recipient shall ensure that all work performed by Recipient or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors is performed in a manner which protects and safeguards the environment and natural resources and which is in compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations. Recipient shall implement an appropriate monitoring system or program to ensure compliance with this provision. 2.11 Recipient agrees that in the event a court of competent jurisdiction finds that the imposition or collection of the special assessments authorized by King County Ordinance No. 14016 are unlawful and orders the repayment of such assessments, Recipient agrees to reimburse the District for the full amount of the grant award, including any interest which may be awarded by the court. 2.12 Recipient agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, its agents, officers, officials and employees from all claims, alleged liability, damages, losses to or death of person or damage to property allegedly resulting from the acts of the Recipient or any of its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. 2.13 Recipient agrees to acknowledge the District as a source of funding for this project on all literature, signage or press releases related to said project. SECTION 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 3.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No prior or contemporaneous representation, inducement, promise or agreement between or among the parties which relate to the subject matter hereof which are not embodied in this Agreement shall be of any force or effect. 3.3 No amendment to this Agreement shall be binding on any of the parties to this Agreement unless such amendment is in writing and is executed by the parties. The parties - 3 - contemplate that this Agreement may from time to time be modified by written amendment which shall be executed by duly authorized representatives of the parties and attached to this Agreement. 3.4 Each party warrants and represents that such party has full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement and each person executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents that he/she has been fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and that such party is bound by the signature of such representative. 3.5 Expenditure of grant funds shall be subject to appropriation by the Metropolitan King County Council. DISTRICT: RECIPIENT: By "� '��� zc ti,a�,�� By Name Kath Keolker—Wheeler ��i� x �, �� ti s ef, Name Y —_ Title � � z�� � .�.� _ Title Mayor Date / . cc 6 Date 'C 16, &OS Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form: DISTRICT LEGAL COUNSEL: RECIPIENT'S ATTORNEY: By By—a� e Name L C �- Name Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date ( I 2 3 Q Date l�, ows— ATTEST: Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk - 4 - CAG-05-203 Exhibit A CAG-05-203 Project Name: SW 34`h Street Culvert Contact: Allen Quynn Replacement Project Applicant: City of Renton Title: Project Manager Principal Partners (if any): Address: 1055 S. Grady Way City of Renton Renton,WA 98055 Total Project Cost: $900,000 estimated Phone: 425-430-7247 KCD Funding Requested: $55,084.85 Fax: 425-430-7247 Project Start Date: April 2005 E-mail: a u nn ci.renton.wa.us Project End Date: Fall 2007 1. Brief Project Description (—200 words): The purpose of this project is to replace the existing Springbrook Creek culvert crossing of SW 341h Street in Renton, Washington. The crossing consists of 4 existing, undersized corrugated metal (CMP) culverts that will be replaced with a new box culvert. Springbrook Creek is the main drainage channel for the 24-square mile Black River Basin that includes portions of the Cities of Renton, Kent, Tukwila and unincorporated King County. Springbrook Creek drains to the Black River Pump Station where flows are pumped into the Green River(see attached figures 6-1 and 6-2). The fisheries resources within Springbrook Creek include Chinook and Coho salmon, steelhead and cutthroat trout. The existing culverts were constructed in 1980 and are a major restriction of flows that contribute to the flooding problems in portions of the south valley during storm events. The project consists of the following elements: • Construction of a new box culvert including stream bypass. • Placement of spawning gravel in the bottom of the culvert. • Placement of woody debris on the sides of the channel. • Planting of riparian trees and shrubs along channel bank. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts, provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): The project will accomplish the following objectives: • Eliminate flooding of the SW 30 Street/Springbrook Creek crossing during the 100-yr storm event. • Lower upstream water levels, which will increase the capacity of local storm systems in Lind Avenue and SW 34`h Street. • Upsizing the SW 341h Street culvert in conjunction with future pipe system improvements will help the City meet flood protection goals in the valley. • Provide improved fish passage and riparian habitat for salmonid migration. The following provides a brief description of how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.01: "To prepare and keep current a comprehensive long-range program recommending the conservation of all the renewable natural resources of the District. Such King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application programs shall be directed toward the best use of renewable natural resources and in a manner that will best meet the needs of the District and the state,taking into consideration, where appropriate, such uses as farming, grazing,timber supply, forest, parks, outdoor recreation, potable water supplies for urban and rural areas, water for agriculture, minimal flow, and industrial uses, watershed stabilization, control of soil erosion, retardation of water run-off, flood prevention and control, reservoirs and other water storage, restriction of developments of flood plains, protection of open space and scenery, preservation of natural beauty, protection of fish and wildlife, preservation of wilderness areas and wild rivers,the prevention or reduction of sedimentation and other pollution in rivers and other waters, and such location of highways, schools, housing developments, industries, airports and other facilities and structures as will fit the needs of the state and be consistent with the best uses of the renewable natural resources of the state. The program shall include an inventory of all renewable natural resources in the District, a compilation of current resource needs, projections of future resource requirements, priorities for various resource activities, projected timetables, descriptions of available alternatives, and provisions for coordination with other resource programs. Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project meets the above criteria by reducing flooding of SW 34`h Street as well as upstream storm systems that discharge to Springbrook Creek. The new culvert will be designed to prevent flooding of the SW 34`h Street crossing during the 100-yr storm event and lower tail water conditions for outfalls discharging upstream. The project will also help protect fish by lowering stream velocities during storm events through the new culvert to facilitate fish passage. KCD Strategic Plan Initiate: This proposal meets the strategic plan element 2,d(iii)Support for Regional Conservation Initiatives, which states: "The District will join in regional conservation initiatives, lending its leadership and expertise on issues such as major river flooding, preserving and restoring fish habitat,protecting and restoring water quality in watersheds and general public conservation education programs in the region". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is one element of a series of projects recommended in the City of Renton's 1997 East Side Green River Watershed Plan and EIS (ESGRWP), which was a basin wide planning level Study to identify projects that would help reduce the flooding in the Renton valley area. The ESGRWP identified the replacement of the SW 34th Street crossing of Springbrook Creek to reduce upstream water levels and improve fish passage. As discussed under the previous criteria, the proposed project will eliminate flooding of SW 34"' Street during the 100-yr storm as well as reduce flooding in local storm systems upstream that discharge to the creek. The project will also improve water quality and provide wildlife habitat with the addition of riparian plantings such as native shrubs and trees along the channel bank. In-stream woody debris will also be added to provide fish rearing and refuge habitat. Springbrook Creek is within Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA) 9. The draft WR1A 9 Salmon Habitat Plan identifies the need for improving fish passage riparian habitat and water quality to benefit Chinook salmon and other salmonids. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant appli cation.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Regional Funding Principles Established by the King County Regional Task Force The project satisfies regional task force funding principles criteria 3,1(ii), which states: "Habitat restoration which enhances ecological significant fish runs". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is located on Springbrook Creek, which historically has poor water quality, particularly low dissolved oxygen due to high water temperatures. The basin, especially the valley floor has become highly urbanized with large commercial and industrial areas that directly discharge to Springbrook Creek. This project will address water quality by planting plants and trees along the channel bank that will help provide shade and help cool the creek during the summer months. Woody debris will also be incorporated into the project to provide channel rearing and refuge habitat for salmon. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Project activities include the following: • Replace existing undersized culverts with a new box culvert to increase conveyance capacity and reduce flooding of SW 34th Street and upstream storm pipe systems. • Construct stream bypass during provide dewatering of groundwater during construction. • Relocate utilities. • Provide a more natural and better-lined streambed to enhance fish passage. This includes adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert. • Provide riparian habitat planting including a mix of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Measurable Results include: • After project construction, observe lower water surface elevations in the channel upstream of SW 34`h Street during high flow events. • A year after construction complete, observe the establishment of native riparian plants in areas planted as part of project restoration. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Total (."it y of Renton Salaries and Benefits Travel/Meals/Mileage Office/Field Supplies Contracted/Professional $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 Services Land Acquisition Permits Other TOTAL $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. HAFile Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 4 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Funding will be acknowledged, reported and tracked using the State of Washington Accounting and Reporting System or"BARS". The use of taxpayer funds provided through the King Conservation District for the above-described projects will be acknowledged through newspaper articles, websites or other information released during project implementation. Attachments Gregg Z rman Date PBPW Ad str 11 or H1File Sys\SWA-Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I-Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp j • j CAG-05-203 East Side Go'en River Black River King County !.. ; Watershed Bundary Water Ouality ,o Management Plan 0-0 Study Area �• •" ''''' •' `� — — O '• ♦ rrr • i ♦/' ♦ ' rrrrrrrrrrrr ♦� � ♦ , - ...� � ,` I ,,,, ♦ parr. e� .',•• ---' ,,, � L G e t — — i r,— i ) .� � � ••'''�� e Panther Lake Z.J .• . �'-'"1 •' King_ Count Garrison 405 �tJ Renton Creek � i Renton e ' ! •--'r'� R n , '� s King County > j #O r Upper rj fj Springbrook Lr. C L'—'_""� 'r" rj • Valley Area Cn 167 Kent L Springbrook Creek r� East Valley Road .� Springbrook ; r Creek Renton Mill 167 Tukwila `. , .• i een Kent j _ �..._.. Black River i� T k 181 181 —.—•— -- --� j Pump Station i uwtto i L.—.J - % ' " � Kent N Tukwila 1 C/' Kent Lagoons 7 . 8 EAST SIDE GREEN RrVER 1-5 Riper WATERSHED PROJECT 0 3000 6000 FIGURE 6-1 o _ 0 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET PROJECT AREA Y 3 ' r rAp,il Alexa.ider- Fwd: WRIA 9: Comment on Draft Revised KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT Nonco mpetitive Grant Appl ml From: April Alexander To: Alexander, April Date: 4/11/2006 2:53:32 PM Subject: Fwd-. WRIA 9: Comment on Draft Revised KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT N nco mpetitive Grant Application Polici >>> "Grob, Linda" <Linda.Grob@METRO KC.GOV> 04/11/06 2:43 PM >>> WRIA 9 Forum members, staff, and other interested participants: Elf CE'NJED APR 14 2006 ' As you know, WRIA 9 relies greatly on our partnership with the King CITY OF RENTON Conservation District(KCD) to help protect and restore our aquatic UTILITY SYSTEMS ecosystems for people and salmon. J KCD is currently proposing revisions to its noncompetitive grant process and 5 16 le soliciting comments. The resulting changes would affect cities and other entities when they apply for non-competitive grants in the future. W� I At KCD's request, we are forwarding a draft of these revisions in the form 4-4 m 1 of a PDF titled "Draft Revised Application Packet April 10 2006". r C i�ty r KCD will take written comments on the proposed revisions until close of ,-uc d �, kQ business Friday, April 21 st. The District will also hold a meeting on Thursday April 20th from 2:00 pm to 3:00 pm where members of the Board of ��ry)'J 1 Supervisors will take comments directly from stakeholders. This meeting will be held at the KCD office in Renton. Driving directions are attached. f For further information and to submit comments, please contact: Brandy Reed King Conservation District 935 Powell Ave SW, Ste. D Renton, WA 98055 brandy.reed(a.kingcd.org <mailto:brandy.reed(aMngcd.org> Phone (425) 277-5581 ext. 120 FAX (425) 277-5588 [p;il Alexander- Fwd: WRIA 9: Comment on Draft Revised KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT Nonco mpetitive Grant Aplal#m9 Please send comments directly to Brandy at KCD by Friday, April 21. Dennis Clark Public Outreach/Stewardship Coordinator Salmon Habitat Recovery Team Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed (WRIA 9) 206-296-1909 Toll free 800-325-6165 TTY 711 <B LOCKED::http://dnr.metrokc.gov/Wrias/9/index.htm> http://dnr.metrokc.gov/Wrias/9/index.htm Service provided under contract by the King County Water and Land Resources Division Member Jurisdiction & WRIA I[( D Forum Noncompetitive Grant King Conservation District Application Packet The King Conservation District noncompetitive grant program supports natural resource improvement projects in partnerships with 34 King County jurisdictions that are members of the District and the WRIA 7, 8 and 9 watershed forums. The King Conservation District awards noncompetitive grants for projects that are consistent with the mandates of the District as established by Chapter 89.08 RCW. The purpose of this document is to convey the grant application process, and describe the eligibility criteria and grant policies and procedures for noncompetitive grants. OVERVIEW The King Conservation District noncompetitive grant program awards grants for natural resource improvement projects within the boundary of the District. See Eligible Natural Resource Improvement Actions on page 2 for details about eligible activities and Grant Budget Policies on page 4 for eligible expenses. Applicants seeking noncompetitive grants shall submit a grant application using the form titled Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Application. This form can be obtained from the King Conservation District or by visiting the District web page at www.kingcd.org/pro—gra.htm. See Grant Application Submittal Procedures detailed on page 6 for instructions on submitting a grant application. Grant applications will be accepted and approved by the King Conservation District Board of Supervisors at regularly scheduled Board meetings between the months of February and October during calendar years 2006 through 2007. Grant applicants will be notified of an award or denial by email or letter within 1 week of a regularly scheduled board meeting at which their grant application was considered. Within three weeks of award of a noncompetitive grant, the District will draft a grant agreement and forward it to the grantee for review and signature. Within five weeks of receiving an agreement signed by a grantee, the District will remit the fully executed agreement and check to the grantee as detailed in General Grant Program Policies on page 3. The amount of time required to complete this entire process varies,but generally takes a minimum of 3 months and a maximum of 7 months. Grant recipients shall submit biannual progress and financial reports, as well as a final narrative and financial report upon completion of the grant project. All documents submitted will be posted on the District web site. See Grant Administration, Accounting&Reporting on page 5 for details on reporting requirements. ELIGIBLE NATURAL RESOURCE IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS Grant proposals shall address a minimum of one of the natural resource improvement actions detailed in this section. These actions have been established consistent with RCW 89.08 and the King Conservation District Strategic Plan, and are intended to direct District natural resource Kin"l{ onserva6loll District Noncr,mmtitive Girant Application t1acket 0 11<trcl�.,2i}t)(i llau)e 1 of 8 management activities to improve natural resource conditions within the boundary of the District. Chapter 89.08 RCW outlines the duties of conservation districts in Washington State. Among these, conservation districts are charged with promoting the implementation of Best Management Practices that conserve soils, protect and enhance water quality, and protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat through education and technical assistance programs, and by leveraging local, state and federal sources of funding. The King Conservation District Strategic Plan identifies the District's priority natural resource conservation initiatives, priority geographic areas, and 2-year and 4-year natural resource management goals and objectives. The current District strategic plan focuses on protecting water quality and quantity; promoting economically viable agriculture; protecting and enhancing wildlife habitat and open-spaces; and encouraging behavior changes in King County residents and organizations. Applicants shall present their proposed project using the appropriate form to summarize a proposed project, outline project outcomes, and identify how the project will achieve performance of at least one of the 4 natural resource improvement actions listed below. Applicants are asked to evaluate their proposals based upon the degree to which their project efficiently, effectively and equitably implements these natural resource improvement actions. Efficiency will be demonstrated by a direct and cost-effective approach, effectiveness will be the degree to which the proposed project produces or achieves the intended results, and equity will be fairness in the geographic and demographic distribution of effects and/or benefits of the proposed project. The District Board of Supervisors shall determine the degree grant applications are consistent with these eligibility criteria. Natural Resource Improvement Actions Education and Outreach- to raise awareness, deepen knowledge, and change behaviors Desired Outcomes- residents, landowners, other land managers, and organizations within the boundary of the District have the knowledge, skills and attitudes needed to practice exemplary stewardship of natural resources. Capacity Building- to enhance the ability of organizations, agencies, residents,landowners and other land managers to implement best management practices and deliver natural resource management actions on the ground Desired Outcomes- organizations, agencies, residents,landowners and other land managers within the boundary of the District have knowledge, skills, tools, support systems and technical resources to employ exemplary natural resource stewardship practices Pilot and Demonstration Projects - to test and/or improve concepts and/or approaches in natural resource management that can be replicated by others Desired Outcomes- demonstrate exemplary practices that,when replicated, contribute to natural resource conservation and from which others can learn; demonstrate novel approaches to natural resources improvement and share this information and extend it to others. Direct Improvement of Natural Resource Conditions - to improve landscape and natural resource conditions as a result of direct action tr7?t. ¢.nset-v,,Itiol,) District Noncompetitive(Jrint.4ppiic:,II r 3 Packet ilia,__2 of 8 r_33 3% Y33 Desired Outcomes-implement conservation practices to protect and enhance water quality; protect and conserve soils;implement ecosystem restoration and preservation projects;and purchase conservation easements and environmentally significant properties. POLICIES General Grant Program Policies 1) Project activities proposed for funding shall be implemented entirely within the boundary of the King Conservation District. 2) Projects shall demonstrate direct on-the-ground improvements to natural resources or result in a product that will lead to direct on-the-ground improvements to natural resources within 3 years of completing the awarded grant project. 3) Eligible Applicants shall include the 34 jurisdictions located in King County that are members of the King Conservation District or their designee; and the designees of the WRIA 7,8 and 9 Watershed Forums. Member jurisdictions include unincorporated King County and all incorporated areas of King County, excluding Enumclaw,Federal Way,Pacific,Milton, and Skykomish. Designees of Watershed Forums and member jurisdictions can include 501 (c) 3 non-profit organizations. 4) The District shall remit grant awards as follows: 90% of the grant award shall be remitted at the time a fully signed agreement is forwarded to a grant recipient; 10% of the grant award shall be held until the grant project is completed, all required documentation has been submitted to the District,and the District has issued grant close-out documentation. 5) Grantees shall conduct maintenance on installed projects and include maintenance reports in their biannual progress reports and final report. Maintenance activities on planting projects shall be conducted a minimum of 5 years following project implementation regardless of the approved project completion.date,and shall include weeding and watering installed plants and replacement planting to achieve 90% survival. Maintenance on installed roads,bridges,and in-stream structures shall include annual inspections for the life of the installed structure. 6) Grant recipients shall acknowledge the King Conservation District as a source of funding for awarded grant activities on all printed,web based, and electronic documents; audio-visual materials; signs; or any other materials produced in association with an awarded grant. 7) Applicants are encouraged to involve community members from their respective communities in the prioritization and selection of proposed projects. 8) Acquisition of real property is permitted for purchase of properties or easements that will protect critical habitat for fish and wildlife and protect or improve water quality, provided the applicant can demonstrate a capacity to maintain the property toward natural resource protection. To the extent possible the properties or easements purchased using the special assessment funds shall have signs indicating that King Conservation District Funds were used in the purchase of property. KjnT,,`.Conservation Oi,trio? '\€3(scwr; ,,66—"�(€r uit:`lppk aiti ip tc:: i'e 0 di<tC'Et,2006 3 of 8 Grant Application Policies 9) Applications submitted by member jurisdiction shall first be reviewed and approved by the legislative authority of those jurisdictions. Applications submitted by Watershed Forums shall first be reviewed and approved by the relevant Watershed Forum. 10) The District shall provide member jurisdictions and Watershed Forums with an estimate of the grant funds available by March 31st of each year. 11) Member jurisdictions, their designees, and the designees of Watershed Forums shall apply for noncompetitive grants using the application forms titled King Conservation District Member Jurisdiction Noncompetitive Grant Application and King Conservation District Watershed Forum Noncompetitive Grant Application respectively. 12) Applications must be received a minimum of three weeks prior to a board meeting scheduled to take place during the months of February through October. Applications received outside this schedule will be reviewed at the next available District board meeting during the months of February through October. 13) Member jurisdiction and Watershed Forum designees may be federal, state or local agencies; other municipal corporations,non-profit organizations, Native American Tribes, and private sector companies that provide services within the boundary of the District. Watershed Forums are required to designate an outside agency or party to apply for a noncompetitive grant with the District. 14) When a primary applicant is a non-profit organization or private sector company, individual applications are limited to a maximum of$50,000, and total awards in a calendar year are limited to a maximum of$150,000. 15) Recommendation of a proposed project by a member jurisdiction or Watershed Forum shall be submitted in the form of a letter from the relevant entity. 16) The King Conservation District Board of Supervisors shall determine whether proposed projects are consistent with the policies and funding criteria of this noncompetitive grant program. Grant Budget Policies 17) Eligible expenditures include direct project costs. Indirect project costs that do not exceed 25% of salaries and benefits are also allowed. 18) Ineligible expenses include management of existing recreation facilities, Watershed Forum Inter Local Agreement fees, and activities that ensure compliance with existing regulations, such as floodplain management regulations and storm-water management regulations. 1.9) Documentation of matching funds is encouraged on all grant applications. Match funds shall include donated services, labor, equipment and supplies that are provided to the project from the date a grant is awarded until. the project completion date identified in the application. 20) Volunteer participation on grant projects shall be valued at a rate consistent with the Washington State minimum wage for individuals under 18 years of age, a rate of$18 4 of 8 e per hour for individuals over 18 years of age,and a rate consistent with an applicable profession for specialists and professionals. 21) Contracted services over$ shall require 3 bids to establish reasonable costs for services to be provided. Applicants shall provide documentation of a bid solicitation process with a submitted application. When 3 bids cannot be obtained, an applicant should submit an explanation for the reduced number of bids. Grant Administration,Accounting, &Reporting Policies 22) Expenditures associated with an awarded grant shall be segregated in the accounting records of the grant recipient. Accounting records shall identify expenditures assigned to a job title or job code consistent with the awarded grant,shall identify income and expenses by line items consistent with the awarded grant budget,and shall be consistent with the Washington State BARS Code System. Accounting records along with a project file must be maintained by the grant recipient for a minimum of three years after the calendar year in which the grant agreement with the District is closed. 23) Progress reports and expense reports shall be submitted 2 times per year,the first due June 30th and the second due November 30th. Progress reports will detail the grantee's progress on completing approved grant tasks using the form titled Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Progress Report. Expense reports will detail project expenses using the form titled Member Jurisdiction &MIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Expense Report. Progress and expense reports shall be submitted in hard copy and electronic formats and will be posted on the District's web page for public access. 24) Upon completion of the project, grant recipients will submit a final project report and final financial report to document compliance with the awarded project proposal; provide before and after photos when applicable; and identify project successes, project difficulties, and lessons learned. Final narrative and expense reports shall be submitted 30 days after completing a grant project using the form titled.Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Final Report and the form titled Member Jurisdiction &MIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Expense Report respectively. Final reports shall be submitted in hard copy and electronic formats and will be posted on the District's web page for public access. 25) The District shall conduct implementation audits of awarded grants at its discretion. Grant recipients shall facilitate the audit process, including but not limited to review of financial records and inspection of on-the-ground activities associated with an awarded grant. 26) A grant will be closed once the District has closed a grant and released all remaining awarded grant funds. Grant Revision Policies 27) Requests to revise an awarded scope of work,budget, and project timeline may be submitted for approval by the Board of Supervisors using the revision request forms titled Member Jurisdiction&MIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Amendment Request, Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Scope of Work Revision Detail, and Member Jurisdiction &WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Budget Revision Detail. Kim-, Ccmservatiari Distrtic"Notic€}I melitisvu(JrIfflt ApplicatioT," l2-ic of March,2006 5 of 8 11 28) Revision requests must be received a minimum of three weeks prior to the District board meeting at which they will be reviewed. Revision requests received outside this schedule will be reviewed at a regularly scheduled board meeting in a following month. 29) Scope of work,budget, and project timeline revision requests shall be accompanied by a letter from the applicable member jurisdiction or watershed forum recommending the proposed revision (e.g., a scope of work revision request for a grant funded in partnership with the Snoqualmie Watershed Forum requires documented concurrence by that entity). SELECTION AND AWARD PROCESS District staff and the District Board of Supervisors will review noncompetitive grant applications prior to an award determination. District staff will review applications to determine if all requested information has been provided. Applications determined to be incomplete will be returned to applicants with an explanation. Applications determined to be complete will be forwarded for review by the Board of Supervisors noncompetitive grant subcommittee. The subcommittee will evaluate proposed projects for their need and feasibility of implementation. District staff will contact applicants when the subcommittee requires additional information to complete its review. The subcommittee will forward applications to the Board of Supervisors for consideration at regularly scheduled board meeting (see Grant Application Policies on page 4). Board review of grant applications will lead to one of three outcomes: an awarded grant, a denied application, or a request for additional information. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES Applicants will submit 6 hard copies of the grant application, one with an original signature, and one electronic copy to the District. Applications must be forwarded to the District by and an applicable municipality or Watershed Forum documenting that entity's recommendation of the project for funding by the District. Applications should be sent to the following address: King Conservation District Noncompetitive Grant Program 935 Powell Ave SW,Ste. D Renton, WA 98055 Electronic copies of applications should be submitted to noncompetitivegrants@kingcd.org ki'.. t i3iiscrvation Dktrict No nc{)m;Oeti'€ve t irxut.t1pp(c. ,.tion 1--ick-et 1W !Nlar(:h, 2006 • hi,-oZ 6 of 8 11 eCl MF v Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum I[( D Noncompetitive Grant Application King Conservation District Project Title: Applicant: Contact: Principal Partners (if any): Title: Total Project Cost: Address: KCD Funding Requested- Phone: Project Start Date: Fax: Project End Date: E-mail: 1. Project Description-provide a brief description of the project that summarizes what you will do,how you will do it, and why you will do it. Consider the following in the answer to this question: what pressing need will be addressed by the project or what promising opportunity will be capitalized on?Who or what will benefit or be positively and negatively affected? 2. Natural Resource Improvement Actions -describe how the project will address a minimum of one of the natural resource improvement actions described on page 1 of the application instructions. Consider the following in your answer to this question: What natural resources will be improved?What are the known needs,gaps or deficits that will be addressed? What are the known benefits to soil, water, air,plants,fish and wildlife, landowners? 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results-list specific project activities to be completed, the timetable for the activities, and the deliverables associated with those activities. Consider the following in your answer to this question: What actions, interventions, programs, services will be deployed? 4. Effectiveness (see page 2 of application instructions for definition) -describe how the project will effectively implement the natural resource improvement measures identified in question No. 2 above. Consider the following in your answer to this question: Why is the primary applicant the best entity to deliver the proposed program/service/intervention?What is the capacity of the primary applicant to deliver the proposed program/service/intervention? What tools, services and partners will be brought to bear? i€li;OmwTvation Dist.o, Noncornp-"titivc Grant Apphcaitio n 1'ItAct N'larch-1 2006 1'1rrge 7 of 8 5. Efficiency (see page 2 of application instructions for definition) - describe how the project will efficiently implement the natural resource improvement measures identified in question No. 2 above. Consider the following in your answer to this question: How will the proposed program/service/intervention engage in conjunction with related efforts?How does your strategy best leverage resources? 6. Equity (see page 2 of application instructions for definition) - describe how the project will equitably implement the natural resource improvement measures identified in question No. 2 above. Consider the following in your answer to this question: In what part of the District will the proposed program/service/intervention occur? Mat geographic area will be affected?Who is the target audience and what demographic section of the community will be affected? 7. Evaluation of Intended Results - describe the evaluation mechanisms you will use to track, document, and report that the project has achieved the intended results described in questions 1-3. 8. Project Budget &Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds Other Funds Total Salaries and Benefits Travel/Meals/Mileage Office/Field Supplies Contracted/Professional Services Land Acquisition Permits Other Other Other TOTAL 9. KCD Acknowledgement-describe how the KCD will be acknowledged as a source of funding for the proposed program/service/intervention (see page 3 of application instructions for requirements). Authorized Signature Date ing€ onwrv<inkm Di:trm ;tioni;mnpktiovc Urant Application Packet M,,irch, 2006 8 of 8 K D Member Jurisdiction & WRIA Forum Noncompetitive Grant Rating Form King conservation District Grant Title: Grant Applicant: Date Reviewed: PERFORMANCE MEASURE POINTS SCORE Project Description & Activities (minimum threshold points) a. what pressing need will be addressed by the project or what promising opportunity will be capitalized on? _points possible a. b. Who or what will benefit or be positively and negatively affected? _points possible b. c. What actions, interventions, programs, services will be deployed? _ points possible C. Subtotal Natural Resource Improvement Action (minimum threshold points) a. What natural resources will be improved? _points possible a. b. What are the known needs, gaps or deficits that will be addressed? _points possible C. c What are the known benefits to soil, water, air, plants, fish and wildlife, landowners? _points possible d. Subtotal Effectiveness: the degree to which the proposed project produces or achieves the intended results (minimum threshold points) a. Why is the primary applicant the best entity to deliver the proposed program/service/intervention? _points possible a. b. What is the capacity of the primary applicant to deliver the proposed program/services/intervention? _points possible b. c. What tools, services and partners will be brought to bear? _points possible C. Subtotal Efficiency: the direct and cost-effective approach (minimum threshold points) a. How will the proposed program/service/intervention engage in conjunction with related efforts? _ points possible a. b. How does your strategy best leverage resources? _points possible b. Subtotal Equity: the fairness in distribution of effects and/or benefits of the proposed project (minimum threshold points) a. In what part of the District will the proposed program/service/intervention occur? _points possible a. b. What geographic area will be affected? _points possible b. c. Who is the target audience and what demographic section of the community will be affected? _points possible C. Subtotal Evaluation (minimum threshold points) a. What mechanisms will be used to track, document, and report that the program/service/intervention achieved the intended results? _points possible a. Subtotal Total Points/Rating Directions To the King Conservation District From Seattle South on 1-5 to Martin Luther King Jr. Way exit (south end of Boeing Field). Take Right on 68th Ave S (second traffic light). Take left onto 7t" Ave (first traffic light). Turn right onto Powell Ave SW (1st intersection). Our office is in the Washington Technical Center business park. Take the second driveway on the right and go around the left side of the building to the southwest corner of the building. Our building is labeled 935. The front door is on the corner of the building, with a sign posted on the front lawn. From Tacoma North on 1-5 to 1-405. North on 1-405 to exit 1 . Take exit 1 . Turn left at end of off-ramp (onto Interurban Ave/West Valley Hwy.). Get into right lane. Turn right onto Grady Way (first traffic light). Turn left onto Powell (second traffic light). Turn left into the fourth driveway and follow the remainder of the directions detailed above. From Bellevue South on 1-405 to exit 2. Take exit 2 and merge onto Rainier Ave (north bound). Get into left lane and turn left onto Grady Way (first traffic light). Turn right onto Powell Ave SW. Turn left into the fourth driveway and follow the remainder of directions detailed above. Our Office Our office is located in Renton, off of Grady 7fh Ave Way, on Powell Ave 0 SW, in the Washington a o Technical Center Q (D KCD Office business park ■ Gradv Wa 935 Powell Ave SW, Ste D 1405 Renton, WA 98055 m (425) 277-5581 ext. 105 Q Fax: (425) 277-5588 P www.kingcd.org 1 6R CITY OF nENTON .,u Office of the City Attorney Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Lawrence I Warren Senior Assistant City Attorneys Mark Barber Zanetta L. Fontes Assistant City Attorneys Ann S. Nielsen Garmon Newsom II MEMORANDUM Sasha P. Alessi TO: Libby Parker, PBPW FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney DATE: December 1, 2005 RE: Resolution for SW 34`h Street Culvert Replacement Project grant The Agreement for the grant for the SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project with King Conservation District Number 9, is approved as to legal form. The original of the authorizing resolution has been sent to the City Clerk and a copy is attached. awrence J. Warr n LJW:ma Enc. cc: Bo nR lien Quynn 6 Post Office Box 626-Renton,Washington 98057-(425)255-8678/FAX(425)255-5474 7RE N T O N ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE I CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR AWARD OF A NON- COMPETITIVE GRANT FOR THE SW 34TH STREET CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT. WHEREAS, King Conservation District No. 9 has funds available to it to assist the City of Renton in providing certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has applied for and received a grant to perform such activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions relating to the award of the grant to the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION IL The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement for the award of a non-competitive grant to the City of Renton from King Conservation District No. 9, for the SW 34'h Street Culvert Replacement Project. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 72005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk 1 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES:1145:12/1/05:ma 2 CONTRACT CHECKLIST s STAFF NAME & EXTENSION NUMBER: Mike Dotson X-7392 DIVISION/DEPARTMENT: Surface Water P/B/PW CONTRACT NUMBER: CA G _U Z, 0 21 - ( /fit c —O Z G -2,L TASK ORDER NUMBER (if applicable): N/A CONTRACTOR: King Conservation District N 'JA PURPOSE OF CONTRACT: To receive grant funds from the King _ Ir-L r,F 1 C E Conservation District. 1. LEGAL REVIEW: (Attached) 2. RISK MANAGEMENT REVIEW FOR INSURANCE: N/A 3. RESPONSE TO LEGAL OR RISK MGMT CONCERNS: (See Attached) 4. INSURANCE CERTIFICATE AND/OR POLICY: N/A 5. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE NUMBER: _N/A_ (Call Finance Dept.) 6. ATTACHED CONTRACTS ARE SIGNED BY CONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT: The King Conservation District will sign the contracts when we return the signed documents. Please return original to Mike Dotson. 7. FISCAL IMPACT: r�L -�5 ���� s A. AMOUNT BUDGETED: (LINE ITEM) (See 8.b)* B. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: 8. COUNCIL APPROVAL REQUIRED: Attached A. CONTRACT OR TASK ORDER IS $50,000 OR OVER: N/A B. *FUND TRANSFER REQUIRED IF CONTRACT EXPENDITURE EXCEEDS AMOUNT BUDGETED. N/A C. SOLE SOURCE CONTRACTS. N/A 9. DATE OF COUNCIL APPROVAL (if applicable): 10/15/02 10, RESOLUTION NUMBER (If applicable): Resolution 3535 11. KEY WORDS FOR CITY CLERK'S INDEX: A. King Conservation District 2001 Grant Agreements B. Edmonds Ave Pocket Park C. May Creek Basin Plan Implementation 2002-043.doc\bh Rev:3/97 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 18,2002 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk FROM: Mike Dotson, Surface Water Engineering Specialist SUBJECT: King Conservation District Grant Agreements for CAG 02-022 C.A4.e2. Please find attached hereto the original signed agreements for the subject grant away 1 02.1 �dTy p��E�+Ta If you have any questions please call me at X-7392. MAR 1 8 ZflOz OFFICE cc: H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2002\2002-154.doc a ,_ ♦ bA CITY OF RENTON CITY CLERK DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: January 31, 2002 TO: Mike Dotson FROM: Suzann Lombard x6521 SUBJECT: King Conservation Dist. #9 May Creek Basin Action Plan Implementation—CAG-02-021 Edmonds Ave Pocket Park—CAG-02-022 As requested in your memorandum, the attached documents have been signed by City officials and are being returned to you for execution by other parties. When fully executed and received by you, please forward a signed copy of the document to the Clerk's office for our permanent record file. Thank you. Enclosures: (4) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3535 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR AWARD OF A NON- COMPETITIVE GRANT. WHEREAS, King Conservation District No. 9 has funds available to it to assist the City of Renton in providing certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has applied for and received a grant to perform such activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions relating to the award of the grant to the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement for award of non-competitive grant to the City of Renton from King Conservation District No. 9. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 15th day of October , 2001. i Marilyn J. etUen, City Clerk 1 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: January 28, 2002 TO: Bonnie Walton,City Clerk's Office FROM: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility SUBJECT: Response to Legal Review Concerns to King Conservation District Interlocal Agreement The city attorney approved the interlocal agreement as to legal form on September 14, 2001, (see attached memo). There are two notes on the legal review that have been addressed. Note 1: The agreement date has expired. Response 1: The date(s) have been changed. Note 2: Check with Finance Department about the use of BARS accounting system. Response 2: Finance Department currently uses the BARS accounting system. If you have any further questions please call Mike Dotson at X-7392. cc: Mike Dotson H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2002\2002-033.doc\N4DD\tb CITY OF RENTON i Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor Lawrence J.Warren MEMORANDUM RECEIVE® SEP 18 2001 CITY OF RENTON To: Ron Straka,PBPW UTILITY SYSTEMS From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date: September 14, 2001 Subject: Resolution authorizing King Conservation District Agreement form. The agreement is approved as to legal form with the following notes: 1) This agreement is out of date (See section 2.1.2 about payments on or before January 31, 2001.) I presume sections 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 will be updated. 2) Check with Finance to see that we satisfy section 2.7 about using the BARS accounting system. A copy of the authorizing resolution is attached. The original has been sent to the City Clerk. Lawrence J. W en LJW:ma. Enc. cc: Jay Covington Marilyn etersen T10 . 31 :55 Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street Renton, Washington 98057 - (425) 255-8678 ®This paper contains 60%recycled material,20%post consumer October 15,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 367 ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3534 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Transit Signal agreement between King County and the City of Renton to implement a Transit Priority Project Funding, King Signal Priority Project in the City of Renton. MOVED BY CLAWSON, County SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3535 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Utility: King Conservation interlocal cooperative agreement with King Conservation District Number 9 for District Grant (' award of a non-competitive grant to be used for conservation activities. l� MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and h� adoption: Ordinance#4918 An ordinance was read annexing approximately 12 acres located east of Annexation: Lee, Hoquiam Hoquiam Ave. NE, north of NE 9th St. (if extended)and west of 144th Ave. SE Ave NE&NE 9th St (if extended);Lee Annexation. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4919 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification for the Lee Annexation: Lee, R-8 Zoning Annexation area from R-4(Urban Residential; four dwelling units per acre, King County zoning)to R-8 (Residential Single Family;eight dwelling units per acre). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4920 An ordinance was read establishing an assessment district for sanitary sewer Special Assessment District: service for properties adjacent to Blaine Ave. NE,and establishing the amount Blaine Ave NE of the charge upon connection to the facilities. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4921 An ordinance was read establishing an assessment district for sanitary sewer Special Assessment District: service for properties adjacent to Aberdeen Ave. NE, from NE 12th St. to NE Aberdeen Ave NE 27th St.,and establishing the amount of the charge upon connection to the facilities. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. The following added ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 10/22/2001 for second and final reading: Special Assessment District: An ordinance was read amending Chapter 9-16, Special Assessment Districts, Time Payments for Sewer of Title 9 (Public Ways)of City Code by adding a new Section 9-16-10, Connection(Alder Request) revising policies pertaining to payment and administration of special assessment charges, and renumbering Sections 9-16-8 through 9-16-12. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PARKER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 10/22/2001. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Reporting that King County Executive Ron Sims presented his budget to the King County: Budget King County Council today, Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler noted that the October 15,2001 Renton City Council Minutes Page 365 Plat: Vineyards,Union Ave Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions,of The Vineyards NE(PP-00-029) preliminary plat;42 single-family lots on 7.32 acres located on Union Ave. NE, between NE 5th St. and NE 7th St. (PP-00-029). Council concur. CAG: 00-099,East Valley Transportation Systems Division requested an additional$110,000 to fund the Road Rehabilitation Project East Valley Road Rehabilitation Project(CAG-00-099)due to changes in the Additional Funding contract requirements as a result of unforeseen conditions. Funds could be taken from the NE 44th Street Project, which is currently on hold. Refer to Transportation Committee. CAG: 00-119,Highlands Transportation Systems Division submitted CAG-00-119,Highlands Neighborhood Walkway& Neighborhood Walkways and Curb Ramps Project; and requested approval of Curb Ramps,GMT Inc the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$322,822.48, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $16,990.66 to GMT,Inc.,contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Authorization was also requested to transfer$25,000 from the Walkways Program to fund additional work needed for this project. Council concur. Transportation: Transit Signal Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with Priority Project Funding,King King County for$270,000 in matching funds towards the Transit Signal County Priority Project. Council concur. (See page 367 for resolution.) Utility: King Conservation Utility Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with the King District Grant C�(t.QVV Conservation District Number 9 to accept the City's share of the King Conservation District's assessment in the amount of$55,466 for use on water quality,habitat and water resource protection projects. Council concur. (See age 367 for resolution.) Utility: Maplewood Water Utility Systems Division recommended acceptance of a five-year Public Works Treatment Improvements Trust Fund Pre-Construction Loan in the amount of$567,831 for the Design,PWTF Loan Maplewood Water Treatment Improvements design. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Transportation(Aviation)Committee Chair Persson presented a report Transportation(Aviation) regarding the installation of security improvements at the Renton Municipal Committee Airport. Because of the events of September 11, 2001, there is a need to move Airport: Security forward, in cooperation with the Boeing Company,other airport tenants and the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA), with the implementation of security improvements at the airport. The Committee concurred with the staff recommendation that the City Council authorize an expenditure of up to $300,000 to identify and install needed security improvements. There is sufficient funding available in the Airport Capital Reserves to pay for these improvements without causing a negative impact to ongoing airport operations or capital projects. The Committee likewise recommended that Council endorse the administration's efforts to obtain funding from such potential partners in these efforts as the Boeing Company, the FAA, and others. The Committee expects periodic progress reports from the administration regarding specific capital improvements and costs as this program progresses. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. CI1 Y OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al N: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: October 15, 2001 Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division - Surface Water Staff Contact...... Gregg Zimmerman, Lys Hornsby, Ron Straka Agenda Status (x-7248) Consent.............. X Subject: Public Hearing.. King Conservation District Agreement For Noncompetitive Correspondence.. Ordinance............. Grants Resolution............ Old Business........ Exhibits: New Business....... Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Information......... Resolution Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grants Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $0 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted.......... Revenue Generated......... $55,466 (1996-2001 approx.) $13,000/yr. Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The King Conservation District (KCD) agreement allows the transfer of the City of Renton's $1- per parcel share of the $5-per parcel King Conservation District Assessment of parcels within Renton. The grant funding can be used on projects that are approved by the KCD such as water quality, habitat enhancement, and water resource protection projects and programs. The current annual amount of grant funding available to the City is approximately $13,000. The agreement for 2001 will allow the City to receive its share of the assessment from 1996 through 2000, which totals $42,466, and the 2001 KCD assessment of approximately $13,000. A total of approximately $55,466 is available to the City through 2001 due to the accrued assessment from prior years. The 1996 - 2001 grant funds will be used to fund the following projects: The Edmonds Ave & Puget Drive Community Pocket Park beautification; The Black River Riparian Forest Planting Project; The May Creek Basin Plan Implementation Bank Stabilization and Habitat Enhancement Projects and other Surface Water Utility projects that are eligible. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends Council approval of a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservation District Assessment annually. The grant funding must be used for water quality, habitat and water resource protection projects that are approved by the King Conservation District. \\CENTRAL\SYS2\DEPTS\PBPW\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-597.doc/RJS\tb CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: October 5, 2001 TO: Dan Clawson, President City Council Members v VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator G Planning/Building/Public Works Department STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka (x-7248) SUBJECT: King Conservation District Agreement for Noncompetitive Grants ISSUE: The Utility Systems Division of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department requests Council approval of a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with the King Conservation District accepting the City of Renton annual share of the approved King Conservation District assessment. The funds received will be placed in a Surface Water Utility account to help fund projects that are eligible for use of the funds. Some of the projects that the funds will be used for include the improvement of water quality, wetland planting, and future stream enhancement and improvement projects as identified by the Cedar River Basin, May Creek Basin, East Side Green River Watershed Plans and the Green River Ecosystem Restoration Program. RECOMMENDATION: The Utility Systems Division of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends the following: • Council approval of a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with the King Conservation District accepting the City of Renton share of the approved King Conservation District assessment. • The approximate total amount of the King Conservation District grant in the agreement, which covers 1996-2001, is $55,466. • The amount of grant funds that will be available in future years on an annual basis is approximately $13,000. • The funds will be used to fund eligible projects that are approved by the King Conservation District. October 5, 2001 Page 2 BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The City of Renton became a member of the King Conservation District in March 1992, upon the passage of Resolution No. 2885. At that time the King County Council approved a $1.25 per parcel assessment against all properties within jurisdictions that are members of the King Conservation District on August 16, 1993. Subsequently, K.C. Ordinance 12959, approved by the King County Council in December 1997, adopted the Regional Water Quality Committee's recommendation to raise the Conservation District annual assessment from $1.25 per parcel to $5 per parcel. The $1.25 per parcel assessment had been in place since the King County Council adopted Ordinance 10981 in August 1993 and was renewed in 1995 by Ordinance 12095. The Ordinances provide that the generated revenues be distributed as follows: • $3 of the assessment is distributed equally to each of the five watershed forums; • $1 per parcel to the County and each city in the District from which the funds were collected; and • $1 per parcel to the District for implementation of its approved work program. The District will spend the funds in cities by providing services or transfer the funding to the cities to be used as financial assistance for stream restoration, fish habitat, and/or water quality types of projects. The current estimated annual share of the King Conservation District assessment, which is available to Renton, is $13,000 per year. The grant funds could be used to pay the District for specific additional services or could be transferred to the City for use on an eligible project(s). The agreement for 2001 will allow the City to receive its share of the assessment from 1996 through 2000, which totals $42,466, and the 2001 KCD assessment of approximately $13,000. A total of approximately $55,466 is available to the City through 2001 due to the accrued assessment from prior years. Attached is a brief description of projects that are being requested for funding by the district for this year. Also attached is a draft copy of an agreement to allow the transfer of funds from the King Conservation District to the City along with a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. The agreement will be executed when the District approves the specific projects for funding. CONCLUSION: A resolution approved by the Council is needed to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King Conservation District to receive the City's share of the King Conservation Districts assessment for use on projects that are approved by the District. \\CENTRAL\SYS2\DEPTS\PBP W\DI VISIONS\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-567.doc\RJS\tb PROPOSED Projects for King Conservation District Funding Requests (1996-2001) • Edmonds Ave and Puget Drive—Seattle Public Utility(SPU)Community Pocket Park Planting and beautification of a Seattle Public Utilities-owned lot: This project would remove areas of impervious surfaces (asphalt and gravel — see attached photos) and replace it with landscape and tree plantings. The lot has previously been a harbor for abandoned vehicles, which has consumed significant amount of City code enforcement and Police resources. As a dumping ground the site offers a serious potential for pollutants to enter the watershed. The primary purpose of this project would be to eliminate the potential for pollutants to enter the watershed through the planting and development of a community pocket park for public use. The park will be signed with Kiosks that describe the watershed and the impact that activities within the watershed have on the aquatic environment. The project is strongly supported by the a neighborhood group (Renton Neighborhood Council), which requested that this project be considered for King Conservation District funding. • May Creek Basin Slope Stabilization and Habitat Enhancement Projects A program of erosion-control measures targeted at the most significant storm water runoff-induced erosion sites in the lower May Creek Basin. This project will focus on the erosion caused by storm systems discharging runoff at the top of steep slopes and implement control measures described in the recommendations made by the May Creek Basin Plan. The May Creek Basin Action Plan also identifies several habitat enhancement projects that the King Conservation District grant funds will be used to implement. The City of Renton, King County and the City of Newcastle have adopted the May Creek Basin Action Plan. • Planting of Black River Riparian Forest The District will design a wetland buffer-planting plan for the City of Renton Black River Riparian Forest. The buffer will be designed as a linear hedgerow varying in width from 10 feet to 30 feet. Once planted, the buffer of native trees and shrubs will provide improved wildlife habitat in the forested wetland and will screen the heron rookery associated with the forested wetland from a nearby development. The District will install a 1,250 square foot section of the planting plan. The City of Renton will be responsible for the installation of the remainder of the plan. • Watershed Forum Plan implementation District funds will be used to fund all or portions of the Watershed Forum plans. These projects will be recommendations from the consensus of the forum jurisdictions. The funding could be used to implement projects that are being developed resulting from the Green River Ecosystem Restoration Program in cooperation with the jurisdictions in the WRIA 9 Forum and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Projects identified as part of the watershed planning to develop a Salmon Conservation Plan for WRIA's 8 & 9 may also be eligible for the King Conservation District grants. \\CENTRAL\SYS2\DEPTS\PBPW\DI V ISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-568.doc\RJS\tb CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR AWARD OF A NON- COMPETITIVE GRANT. WHEREAS, King Conservation District No. 9 has funds available to it to assist the City of Renton in providing certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has applied for and received a grant to perform such activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions relating to the award of the grant to the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement for award of non-competitive grant to the City of Renton from King Conservation District No. 9. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2001. Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk 1 ` RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2001. Jesse Tanner, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.874:9/13/01:ma 2 AGREEMENT FOR AWARD OF NONCOMPETITIVE GRANT City of This Agreement is made between the King Conservation District Number 9, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 935 Powell Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 (referred to herein as "District"), and a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at (referred to herein as "Recipient"), for the purposes set forth herein. SECTION 1. RECITALS 1.1 Whereas,the District is a special purpose district organized and existing under authority of Chapter 89.08 RCW. The District engages in and provides certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and 1.2 Whereas,on December 15, 1997,the Metropolitan King County Council enacted King County Ordinance No. 12959 which, among other things,provides for the distribution of noncompetitive grant funds from a portion of the special assessments imposed by King County Ordinance No. 12959 and collected by the District pursuant to Chapter 89.08 RCW; and 1.3 Whereas,on November 19, 1998,the District adopted Resolution No. 98-20 relating to the policy and procedures governing the District's award of any noncompetitive grants authorized by King County Ordinance No. 12959; and 1.4 Whereas,King County's Regional Water Quality Committee which was formed for the purpose of addressing and responding to regional environmental needs has established regional funding principles to be considered during the process of awarding noncompetitive grants; and 1.5 Whereas,the District has reviewed the grant application submitted by Recipient and has determined that the application meets the requirements of Chapter 89.08 RCW and the District's policy and procedures for awarding noncompetitive grants; and 1.6 Whereas,the District and Recipient desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of establishing the terms and conditions relating to the District's award of a noncompetitive grant to Recipient. SECTION 2. AGREEMENT 2.1 The District agrees to award Recipient a grant in the total amount of Dollars($ from 2000 Assessments and $ from 19_Assessments). Grant funds shall be used by Recipient solely for the performance of the work described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto - 1 - and incorporated herein by this reference. The District shall pay the grant funds to Recipient in accordance with the following paragraphs. 2.1.1 Grant funds from 1998 or 1999 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient within five(5)business days after District's receipt of a fully executed Agreement. 2.1.2 Grant funds from 2000 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient on or before January 31,2001,provided that such funds have been collected and received by the District and thereafter in quarterly installments as funds are received. 2.2 Recipient represents and warrants that it will only use the grant funds for the work described in Exhibit A. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized work. 2.3 Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the grant funds may only be expended on work which shall be entirely within the District's jurisdictional boundaries. The following municipal entities are not within the District's jurisdictional boundaries: Enumclaw,Federal Way, Milton,Pacific, Skykomish and Tukwila. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for work performed outside the District's jurisdictional boundaries. 2.4 In the event the scope of work authorized by this Agreement includes the use of grant funds to purchase houses located on real property within a flood hazard area,Recipient acknowledges and agrees that grant funds may only be used for such purposes if the houses to be purchased were constructed before floodplain mapping or sensitive areas regulations were in place for that area. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized purposes. 2.5 Recipient shall be required to provide the District with biannual financial and project progress reports, along with an annual summary report. Financial and project reports shall be due May 31 and November 30 each year. The Recipient shall also be required to submit to the District a final report which documents the Recipient's completion of the work in conformance with this Agreement within thirty (30) days after the completion of the work. The final report shall, among other things, summarize the project's successes and shall address the regional benefits accomplished by the work. The final report shall also identify any obstacles or challenges which were encountered during the work, along with general recommendations regarding ways to avoid such obstacles or challenges in the future. If requested,Recipient agrees to provide the District with additional financial or progress reports from time to time, at reasonable intervals. 2.6 Recipient's expenditures of grant funds shall be separately identified in the Recipient's accounting records. If requested, Recipient shall comply with other reasonable requests made by the District with respect to the manner in which project expenditures are tracked and accounted for in Recipient's accounting books and records. Recipient shall maintain such records of expenditures as may be necessary to conform to generally accepted accounting principals and to meet the requirements of all applicable state and federal laws. - 2 - 2.7 Recipient shall be required to track project expenses using the Budget Accounting and Reporting System for the State of Washington("BARS"). 2.8 The District or its representative shall have the right from time to time,at reasonable intervals,to audit the Recipient's books and records in order to verify compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Recipient shall cooperate with the District in any such audit. 2.9 Recipient shall retain all accounting records and project files relating to this Agreement in accordance with criteria established in the Revised Code of Washington and the Washington State Archivist. 2.10 Recipient shall ensure that all work performed by Recipient or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors is performed in a manner which protects and safeguards the environment and natural resources and which is in compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations. Recipient shall implement an appropriate monitoring system or program to ensure compliance with this provision. 2.11 Recipient agrees that in the event a court of competent jurisdiction finds that the imposition or collection of the special assessments authorized by King County Ordinance No. 12959 is unlawful and orders the repayment of such assessments, Recipient agrees to reimburse the District for the full amount of the grant award,including any interest which may be awarded by the court. 2.12 Recipient agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, its agents, officers,officials and employees from all claims, alleged liability, damages,losses to or death of person or damage to property allegedly resulting from the acts of the Recipient or any of its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. 2.13 Recipient agrees to acknowledge the District as a source of funding for this project on all literature, signage or press releases related to said project. SECTION 3. GENERAL PROVISIONg 3.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to�he benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 3.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No prior or contemporaneous representation, inducement,promise or agreement between or among the parties which relate to the subject matter hereof which are not embodied in this Agreement shall be of any force or effect. 3.3 No amendment to this Agreement shall be binding on any of the parties to this Agreement unless such amendment is in writing and is executed by the parties. - 3 - 3.4 Each party warrants and represents that such party has full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement and each person executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents that he/she has been fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and that such party is bound by the signature of such representative. 3.5 Expenditure of grant funds shall be subject to appropriation by the Metropolitan King County Council. DISTRICT: RECIPIENT: By By Name Name Title Title Date Date Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form: DISTRICT LEGAL COUNSEL: RECIPIENT'S ATTORNEY: By By Name Name Date Date - 4 - CAG-02-021 AGREEMENT FOR AWARD OF NONCOMPETITIVE GRANT City of Renton This Agreement is made between the King Conservation District Number 9, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 935 Powell Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 (referred to herein as "District"), and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 1055 South Grady Way, Fifth Floor, Renton Washington 98055 (referred to herein as "Recipient"), for the purposes set forth herein. SECTION 1. RECITALS 1.1 Whereas, the District is a special purpose district organized and existing under authority of Chapter 89.08 RCW. The District engages in and provides certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and 1.2 Whereas, on December 15, 1997, the Metropolitan King County Council enacted King County Ordinance No. 12959 which, among other things, provides for the distribution of noncompetitive grant funds from a portion of the special assessments imposed by King County Ordinance No. 12959 and collected by the District pursuant to Chapter 89.08 RCW; and 1.3 Whereas, on December 15, 2000, the Metropolitan King County Council enacted King County Ordinance No. 14016 which, among other things, provides for the distribution of noncompetitive grant funds from a portion of the special assessments imposed by King County Ordinance No. 14016 and collected by the District pursuant to Chapter 89.08 RCW; and 1.4 Whereas, on November 19, 1998, the District adopted Resolution No. 98-20 relating to the policy and procedures governing the District's award of any noncompetitive grants authorized by King County; and 1.5 Whereas, King County's Regional Water Quality Committee which was formed for the purpose of addressing and responding to regional environmental needs has established regional funding principles to be considered during the process of awarding noncompetitive grants; and 1.6 Whereas, the District has reviewed the grant application submitted by Recipient and has determined that the application meets the requirements of Chapter 89.08 RCW and the District's policy and procedures for awarding noncompetitive grants; and 1.7 Whereas, the District and Recipient desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of establishing the terms and conditions relating to the District's award of a noncompetitive grant to Recipient. - 1 - r r SECTION 2. AGREEMENT 2.1 The District agrees to award Recipient a grant in the total amount of Forty-five thousand nine-hundred seventy-eight Dollars ($8,511.26 from 2001 Assessments, $14, 484.72 from 2000 Assessments, $13, 641.31 from 1999 Assessments, and $9,340.71 from 1998 Assessments). Grant funds shall be used by Recipient solely for the performance of the work described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The District shall pay the grant funds to Recipient in accordance with the following paragraphs. 2.1.1 Grant funds from 1998, 1999 and/or 2000 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient within five (5)business days after District's receipt of a fully executed Agreement. 2.1.2 Grant funds from 2001 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient on or before January 31, 2002, provided that such funds have been collected and received by the District and thereafter in quarterly installments as funds are received. 2.2 Recipient represents and warrants that it will only use the grant funds for the work described in Exhibit A. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized work. 2.3 Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the grant funds may only be expended on work which shall be entirely within the District's jurisdictional boundaries. The following municipal entities are not within the District's jurisdictional boundaries: Enumclaw, Federal Way, Milton, Pacific, Skykomish and Tukwila. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for work performed outside the District's jurisdictional boundaries. 2.4 In the event the scope of work authorized by this Agreement includes the use of grant funds to purchase houses located on real property within a flood hazard area, Recipient acknowledges and agrees that grant funds may only be used for such purposes if the houses to be purchased were constructed before floodplain mapping or sensitive areas regulations were in place for that area. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized purposes. 2.5 Recipient shall be required to provide the District with biannual financial and project progress reports, along with an annual summary report. Financial and project reports shall be due May 31 and November 30 each year. The Recipient shall also be required to submit to the District a final report which documents the Recipient's completion of the work in conformance with this Agreement within thirty(30) days after the completion of the work. The final report shall, among other things, summarize the project's successes and shall address the regional benefits accomplished by the work. The final report shall also identify any obstacles or challenges which were encountered during the work, along with general recommendations regarding ways to avoid such obstacles or challenges in the future. If requested, Recipient agrees to provide the District with additional financial or progress reports from time to time, at reasonable intervals. - 2 - 2.6 Recipient's expenditures of grant funds shall be separately identified in the Recipient's accounting records. If requested, Recipient shall comply with other reasonable requests made by the District with respect to the manner in which project expenditures are tracked and accounted for in Recipient's accounting books and records. Recipient shall maintain such records of expenditures as may be necessary to conform to generally accepted accounting principals and to meet the requirements of all applicable state and federal laws. 2.7 Recipient shall be required to track project expenses using the Budget Accounting and Reporting System for the State of Washington("BARS"). 2.8 The District or its representative shall have the right from time to time, at reasonable intervals, to audit the Recipient's books and records in order to verify compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Recipient shall cooperate with the District in any such audit. 2.9 Recipient shall retain all accounting records and project files relating to this Agreement in accordance with criteria established in the Revised Code of Washington and the Washington State Archivist. 2.10 Recipient shall ensure that all work performed by Recipient or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors is performed in a manner which protects and safeguards the environment and natural resources and which is in compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations. Recipient shall implement an appropriate monitoring system or program to ensure compliance with this provision. 2.11 Recipient agrees that in the event a court of competent jurisdiction finds that the imposition or collection of the special assessments authorized by King County Ordinance No. 12959 is unlawful and orders the repayment of such assessments, Recipient agrees to reimburse the District for the full amount of the grant award, including any interest which may be awarded by the court. 2.12 Recipient agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, its agents, officers, officials and employees from all claims, alleged liability, damages, losses to or death of person or damage to property allegedly resulting from the acts of the Recipient or any of its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. 2.13 Recipient agrees to acknowledge the District as a source of funding for this project on all literature, signage or press releases related to said project. SECTION 3. GE1XF"L PROVISIONS 3.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 3.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No prior or contemporaneous representation, inducement,promise or - 3 - r agreement between or among the parties which relate to the subject matter hereof which are not embodied in this Agreement shall be of any force or effect. 3.3 No amendment to this Agreement shall be binding on any of the parties to this Agreement unless such amendment is in writing and is executed by the parties. 3.4 Each party warrants and represents that such party has full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement and each person executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents that he/she has been fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and that such party is bound by the signature of such representative. 3.5 Expenditure of grant funds shall be subject to appropriation by the Metropolitan King County Council. DISTRICT: RECIPIENT: By f a By tr` t- _ f Name Name Jesse Tanner Title y r Title Mayor Date —0 U 7i Date Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form: DISTRICT LEGAL COUNSEL: RECIPIENT'S ATTORNEY: By Name E( (, C. F(i\Vy of Name Lawrence J. Warren Date `1 0 J. Date 3/- ft r L Vhb^CkyCleric Now - 4 - Exhibit A City of Renton King Conservation District Watershed Forum and Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Project Name: May Creek Basin Action Plan Contact(s): Mike Dotson Implementation Applicant: City of Renton Title: Engineer Specialist IIl, Surface Water Utility Principal City of Renton,King County Address: 1055 South Grady Way, Partners: Water and Land Resources 51h Floor, Renton WA, Division, City of Newcastle 98055 Total Project Phone: 425-430-7392 Cost: $805,000 KCD Funding Email: mdotson@ci.renton.wa.us Requested: $45,978 Project Start Fax: 425-430-7241 Date: September 2001 Project End Date: December 2005 Project Funds Requested from King Conservation District: $45,978 (The actual amount is dependant upon the actual grant funds available to Renton from the KCD assessment since the last time Renton received its share of the KCD assessment, less grant funds requested on the other 2001 grant applications.) 1. Project Description: The May Creek Basin Action Plan identifies actions to reduce flooding, erosion and improves water quality and fish habitat. The Actions that the King Conservation District funding will be used to supplement City funds to implement include the following: • Recommendation#11: Stabilize the slopes at the most significant erosion sites in the May Creek Canyon related to surface water runoff. A program of erosion-control measures targeted at the most significant surface runoff-induced erosion sites in the lower May Creek basin to prevent erosion and protect water quality and fish habitat. • Recommendation#12: Placement of large woody debris in May Creek Canyon to provide increased stream channel protection to prevent stream bank erosion and improve aquatic habitat. • Recommendation#13: Plant Conifers throughout the Riparian Area in the May Creek Canyon to improve bank stability and reduce erosion and repair stream habitat in the lower 3.9 miles of the stream. The above actions described in this application are a part of the recommendations made by the May Creek Basin Action`Plan. The City of Renton, King County and the City of Newcastle Council's have adopted the May Creek Action Plan. Page 1 H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-359.doc/MDD/tb City of Renton King Conservation District Watershed Forum and Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Project Objectives: • Recommendation#11: To develop and implement a plan to identify and design solutions for the most appropriate sites for stabilization. The objective will be to implement measures to limit the impact of surface-water runoff on these slopes and to reduce existing erosion to improve water quality and protect fish habitat. • Recommendation#12: To provide increased stream channel protection to prevent stream bank erosion,reduce downstream flooding due to sediment deposition and improve aquatic habitat. • Recommendation#13: To improve bank stability,reduce bank erosion and repair stream riparian habitat in the lower 3.9 miles of the stream. The following provides a brief description of specifically how the project meets one criterion and the objectives as set forth in each of the three required categories(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08: It is stated in the RCW 89.08.01 Preamble section 3: "That to conserve soil resources and control and prevent soil erosion and prevent flood water and sediment damages... it is necessary that land-use practices contributing to soil wastage and soil erosion be discouraged and discontinued, and appropriate soil-conserving land-use practices, and works of improvement for flood prevention of agricultural and nonagricultural phases of the conservation,development,utilization, and disposal of water be adopted and carried out;that among the procedures necessary for widespread adoption, are the carrying on of engineering operations such as the construction of terraces,terrace outlets, check-dams, desilting basins,flood water retarding structures,channel floodways, dikes, ponds, ditches,and the like;the utilization of strip cropping,contour cultivating, and contour furrowing; land irrigation; seeding and planting of waste,sloping,abandoned,or eroded lands to water-conserving and erosion-preventing plants,trees,and grasses; forestation and reforestation; rotation of crops;soil stabilizations with trees,grasses, legumes,and other thick-growing,soil-holding crops,retardation of run-off by increasing absorption of rainfall; and retirement from cultivation of steep,highly erosive areas and areas now badly gullied or otherwise eroded." Description of how this project meets these criteria: This project meets the criteria as set forth in the above text,through the prevention of erosion and deposition of fine sediments into May Creek and reforestation of the riparian area. The project will focus on stabilizing stream banks from erosion,reforestation and reducing erosion from existing stormwater outfalls that are discharging at the top of steep slopes. Page 2 H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-359.doc/MDD/tb City of Renton King Conservation District Watershed Forum and Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application KCD Strategic Plan Initiative: This proposal meets the strategic plan elements in multiple categories. It specifically addresses the criteria set forth in section 3,a(iii)which states; To carry out preventative and control measures and works of improvement for the conservation of renewable natural resources,within the district including,but not limited to,engineering operations, methods of cultivation,the growing of vegetation,changes in use of lands,and the measures listed in RCW 89.08.010,on any lands within the district upon obtaining the consent of the occupier of such lands and such necessary rights or interests in such lands as may be required; This goal will be carried out by several stream restoration projects designed to improve degraded conditions or provide additional habitat throughout the basin. The May Creek Basin Plan recommends improvements in the May Creek delta; improve fish habitat and stream stability by introducing additional large woody debris in May Creek Canyon; provide slope-stabilization measures to limit erosion and sediment delivery to the creek; and provide small conifer plantings throughout the basin to improve streambank stability,moderate stream temperatures, and become a source for vital organic inputs(e.g. large woody debris)to the stream over the long tern. In key locations,projects proposed in the plan would eliminate fish-passage barriers in order to improve upstream access for species using May Creek and its tributaries. Regional Task Force Funding Principles The regional task force funding principles satisfied by this proposal are as follows: RTF Funding Principle 1. b) "habitat restoration which enhances ecologically significant fish runs." Description of how this project meets these criteria: This project lies within the May Creek Basin. There has been an historic run of Chinook in May Creek, and the system does provide habitat elements,which still support coho salmon and sockeye salmon in addition to sea-run cutthroat trout and rainbow trout. Control of erosion and sedimentation and stream bank stabilization in this watershed will improve water quality and therefore enhance the fish runs within the May Creek Basin. 2. Project Activities and Measurable Results: • Recommendation #11: Stabilize the slopes at the most significant erosion sites in the May Creek Canyon related to surface water runoff. Phase I—Identify the most appropriate sites for stabilization. Identification of these sites would be based upon their size, amount of contribution to the May and Honey Creek sediment problem, expected costs,feasibility of stabilization, and the cause of the erosion problem. Phase 11—Project Design&Permitting. Design solutions are most likely to involve measures to limit the impact of surface-water runoff on these slopes to prevent aggravation of existing problems. Examples of slope problems and possible solutions include the following: Page 3 H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\200I\2001-359.doc/MDD/tb City of Renton King Conservation District Watershed Forum and Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application (Note: Given the high cost of stabilizing these sites and the significant changes in the canyon's ravine walls due to storms during the winter of 1996-97, prioritization among several identified candidate sites will be necessary before design of these measures is begun. The highest priority sites identified at this time include Honey Creek at River Mile 0.5, and May Creek at River Mile 1.2 and River Mile 1.9.) • Active erosion of canyon walls at River Mile 1.2 of May Creek,where drainage and stormflow from an apartment complex have been concentrated. Chronic erosion and deposition of fine sediments into May Creek is occurring with resultant delivery of sediment to the May Creek LSRA and the mouth of May Creek. In addition, approximately 6 to 8 feet of fill is encroaching upon the edge of the canyon wall, and revegetation of the fill is inhibited by the steepness and looseness of the material. A solution at this site could involve diverting the runoff,which currently flows over the valley wall, into storm drains.If diversion is not possible, directing flows into a new flexible plastic pipe down the valley wall could be attempted. A small energy dissipater and detention pond on the floodplain at the foot of the hill might be necessary as well. The slope itself could require installation of backfilled slope breakers across the face of the eroding slide, with subsequent revegetation. • ,At River Mile 1.9 of May Creek,an 18-inch corrugated metal pipe has separated at the joint, resulting in two slope failures that deposit sediment into the May Creek LSRA and the delta. Repair work at this site could include measures such as installing plastic pipe down the slope; slope breaks to hold soil on the steep, eroded face;and revegetation. Measures such as these would prevent future erosion and avoid delivery of coarse sediment to the creek from additional slumps,thereby improving water quality and aquatic habitat. Phase III: Construction: Upon the selection and design of the sites construction of appropriate, cost-effective measures will be undertaken. • Recommendation#12: Placement of large woody debris in May Creek Canyon. Phase I: In coordination with King County and the City of Newcastle,develop and identify reaches where large woody debris will be placed,prepare a construction plan, secure the required permits and land rights to allow construction. Phase II: Construction of the approved plan,which may be done in phases over more than one year. • Recommendation#13: Plant Conifers throughout the Riparian Area in the May Creek Canyon. Phase I: In coordination with King County and the City of Newcastle, develop and identify areas where the planting of conifers would be done in the May Creek Canyon and,prepare a construction (planting)plan, secure the required permits and land rights to allow construction. Page 4 H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-359.doe/MDD/tb City of Renton King Conservation District Watershed Forum and Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Phase II: Construction of the approved plan,which may be done in phases over more than one year. The planting may be done as part of volunteer planting projects or by hired contractors. 1. Budget Expenses: Budget Item KCD Funds King County City of City of Total Renton Newcastle Salaries and Amounts of each budget item to be Benefits proportioned according to Interlocal Travel/Meals Agreement(See attached Exh. B) Mileage Office/Field Supplies Contracted/ Professional Services $45,978 $45,978 Land Acquisition Permits $759,022 $759,022 Total $45,978 $160,000 1 $514,022 95,000 $805,000 Future King Conservation District Grant funds may be requested to assist in funding the implementation of the May Creek Basin Action Plan's recommendations. 2. Describe how the KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. Funding will be acknowledged,reported and tracked through the utilization of the Budget Accounting and Reporting System of the State or Washington("BARS"). It will be acknowledged that tax payer funds provided through the King Conservation District is being used for the implementation of these above described recommendations in any newspaper articles, website or other information released during their implementation. �J 2/&0, 2, K k, Gregg Zi ,Admmistrator Date PlanningB Ilding/Public Works Department Page 5 H:\DI VISION.S\UTILTTIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-359.doc/MDD/tb ' MAY ' 'EEK BASIN PLAN IMPLEMENT TION Exhibit B INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT I This agreement is entered into by and between King County, Washington, 2 hereinafter known as "King County", the City of Renton, hereinafter known as"Renton", 3 and the City of Newcastle, hereinafter known as"Newcastle",collectively referred to as 4 "the Parties", to cooperatively undertake actions to protect and restore the May Creek 5 Basin. These actions are outlined in the 1998 May Creek Basin Action Plan which sets 6 forth policies, programs, regulations, and actions to protect surface waters and natural 7 resources and to address flooding in the May Creek Basin, a sub-basin of the Lake 8 Washington Watershed in central King County. 9 10 WHEREAS,the Parties share jurisdiction within the May Creek Basin("the 11 Basin") and recognize that the Basin's extensive natural resource system of streams, 12 lakes,and wetlands is worthy of restoration and protection to promote water quality,fish 13 habitat,recreation, and flood storage values in the Basin; and 14 WHEREAS, the Parties recognize the importance of protecting and restoring the 15 water resources and habitat quality of Lake Washington by maintaining the water quality 16 of surface waters entering Lake Washington from the May Creek Basin; and 17 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to address existing drainage,flooding, and erosion 18 and sedimentation problems in the May Creek Basin; and 19 WHEREAS, existing and proposed development in the Basin threatens the 20 stability and function of the Basin's natural resource system and is likely to exacerbate 21 flooding,erosion, sedimentation and water quality problems, and to adversely impact the 22 quality of life and habitat in the Basin; and 23 WHEREAS, in 1994, King County and Renton entered into the May Creek Basin 24 Plan Development Interlocal Agreement to develop a comprehensive plan to address 25 surface water concerns in the watershed; and 26 WHEREAS, the City of Newcastle became an incorporated city in 1995 and has 27 shared jurisdiction in the May Creek Basin with Renton and King County since that time; 28 and 29 WHEREAS,The Parties,in consultation with the May Creek Citizens Advisory 30 Committee(CAC), have undertaken basin-wide planning as the most effective means to 31 address surface-water related problems in the Basin and to protect the ecological health 32 and public benefits of the Basin over the long term; and 33 WHEREAS, the Parties have cooperated to complete the May Creek Basin Action 34 Plan ("the Plan"), which outlines recommended programs, policies and actions to protect 35 the Basin's natural resources and water quality and to address flooding; and 36 WHEREAS,The Parties wish to work cooperatively to implement Plan 37 recommendations; and 38 WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 39.34, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the Parties 39 are each authorized to enter into an agreement for cooperative action, 40 41 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows: - 1 06/14/01 1 I. Purpose of the Agreement 2 A. This agreement describes the actions to be undertaken and funded by the Parties 3 for the protection and enhancement of the May Creek Basin,based on the 4 recommendations of the 1998 May.Creek Basin Action Plan. Recommendations 5 presented in the Plan are separated into two categories: 6 1. Primary recommendations are those of highest priority for Basin protection 7 and enhancement and are intended to be implemented, through this agreement, 8 within the first five years following adoption of the Plan. 9 2. Secondary recommendations address issues of secondary priority and will 10 likely involve implementation timelines beyond the initial five year Plan 11 implementation period. Though the Basin Plan identifies probable 12 jurisdictional responsibilities for secondary recommendations,their 13 implementation is beyond the scope of this agreement. 14 Plan recommendations and actions by the Parties to protect and enhance the Basin 15 are outlined in agreement Exhibit One, attached to this agreement and 16 incorporated herein and made a part hereof, and include actions to be conducted 17 cooperatively and individually. Cooperative actions may require additional action 18 of the Councils of each jurisdiction in order to be implemented. 19 This agreement establishes the May Creek Basin Committee,composed of 20 representatives of each of the Parties, to provide overall management and review 21 of Plan implementation activities. 22 23 II. Basin Characteristics 24 The May Creek Basin covers approximately 14 square miles in central King 25 County and drains to the southeast shore of Lake Washington. The western one- 26 third of the Basin,much of it a natural floodplain,is characterized by intensive 27 residential development and significantly reduced forest cover. The eastern two- 28 thirds of the Basin is lightly developed,but land use changes have also resulted in 29 the reduction of forest cover and an increase in impervious ground surface. 30 Development in the region has resulted in the filling of wetlands, increased 31 erosion and sedimentation, and increased threats to ecological and public health. 32 33 Land use changes in the Basin have caused increased stormwater runoff 34 throughout the Basin. Flood flows have also increased, resulting in additional 35 erosion of hillsides above May Valley,flooding and sediment deposition in the 36 valley,erosion in the canyon downstream of the valley and flooding and 37 deposition near the mouth of May Creek. Higher storm flows and lowered 38 floodwater storage capacity in the Basin also decrease dry weather in-stream 39 flows and raise water temperatures,both of which are detrimental to resident and 40 migratory fish. 41 42 Basin land use changes have also affected water quality in-May Creek and its 43 tributaries. Pollution from industrial, agricultural, and residential sources has 2 I reduced the habitat value of local streams and has placed underground drinking 2 water sources,critical to the residents of the Basin and the City of Renton, at risk. 3 4 Although surface water problems exist in the Basin,it retains high quality natural 5 resources and attributes worthy of protection and enhancement. Most of the 6 mainstem of lower May Creek benefits from a moderately well forested riparian 7 area that is protected as park land. May Creek provides habitat to numerous fish 8 and wildlife in both its lower and upland portions. Coho, chinook,and sockeye 9 salmon, as well as steelhead and cutthroat trout are all supported by the May 10 Creek system. In addition to stream habitat, there is an extensive array of 11 wetlands, a critically valuable resource, within the Basin. King County Wetland 12 #11 on tributary 0289 is considered to be a Regionally Significant Resource Area 13 (RSRA), and several of the Basin's wetlands meet the definition for Locally 14 Significant Resource Areas (LSRA). Significant Resource Areas are described in 15 the Plan, and are areas of special ecological significance within the entire 16 watershed. 17 18 III. Basin Plan Goals and Activities to Achieve Goals 19 A. Goals 20 The primary goals of the May Creek Basin Action Plan are to: 21 1. Reduce the threat of flooding of homes where living areas have been 22 adversely affected; 23 2. Make infrastructure improvements that will facilitate stormflow conveyance, 24 stabilize stream banks, and reduce erosion; 25 3. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water quality in the Basin; 26 4. Take reasonable steps to prevent existing habitat degradation, water quality, 27 flooding, and sedimentation and erosion problems from worsening in the 28 future. 29 30 B. Actions to Achieve Goals 31 The May Creek Basin Action Plan identifies eighteen high priority 32 recommendations to address surface water related problems and to protect and 33 enhance resources in the Basin. The specific recommendations are outlined on 34 Exhibit One, and are categorized as follows: 35 1. Regulatory measures for new development to appropriately control surface 36 water runoff and erosion and to protect water quality; 37 2. Education and stewardship activities to involve and educate the public in 38 protecting Basin resources; 39 3. Monitoring activities to gauge the health of Basin resources and the 40 effectiveness of management and Plan implementation activities over time; 41 4. Flood protection and habitat improvement/enhancement measures, including 42 construction projects, vegetation planting, and landowner incentive and 43 assistance programs. 3 1 2 IV. Project Management 3 A. Overall project management and direction for Basin Plan implementation 4 activities will be performed by the May Creek Basin Committee, to be composed 5 of the Newcastle Public Works Director,the Renton Surface Water Utility 6 Engineering Supervisor, and the Basin Steward representing the May Creek 7 watershed for King County,or other representatives from each jurisdiction as 8 designated by each Party. Additional staff persons representing any of the Parties 9 are welcome to attend Basin Committee meetings to support Committee activities. 10 B. The Basin Committee will meet as needed,but at least semi-annually. 11 C. Basin Committee responsibilities are as follows: 12 1. pre-implementation review and approval of project designs for joint projects; 13 2. review and approval of major design and funding modifications for 14 implementation actions,including amendments to project scopes of work for 15 joint projects; 16 3. review and approval of prioritization and scheduling of joint implementation 17 actions; and 18 4. discuss outcomes of completed and on-going implementation actions, 19 including the results of Basin monitoring activities. 20 D. The King County representative shall serve as facilitator_for Basin Committee 21 meetings and will provide meeting-related support including arranging meeting 22 schedules,keeping and distributing meeting minutes, and providing agendas. 23 E. It is the intent of the Parties to continue to involve the public in protecting the 24 Basin's resources and implementing the Plan. The Basin Committee shall 25 consider any input on Basin issues provided by the CAC or other interested 26 citizens. 27 F. The Basin Committee will reach its decisions by consensus. Issues that cannot be 28 resolved by the Basin Committee will be referred as needed to the King County 29 Water and Land Resources Division Manager or his/her designee, the Renton 30 Department of Planning,Building, and Public Works Department Administrator 31 or his/her designee, and the Newcastle City Manager,or his/her designee. 32 33 V. Responsibilities 34 The Parties will undertake Plan implementation activities outlined on Exhibit 35 One, including shared and individual actions. Implementation funding for each 36 plan recommendation whether programmatic or capital project construction, is 37 dependent upon budget appropriation actions to be taken by each participating 38 jurisdiction's legislative(Council)body. Implementation of all capital 39 improvement projects is contingent upon receipt of any required permits before 40 construction. 4 I A. Shared Responsibilities 2 1. Each Party shall provide a representative to serve on the Basin Committee and 3 shall provide any needed support to the Basin Committee member- 4 2. Plan Recommendation 1: Establish and Enforce Requirements for Runoff 5 Retention/Detention, Forest Retention, and Water Quality Facilities for Site 6 Development. Each Party shall work to implement appropriate development 7 standards, as detailed in the Plan,including: 8 (a) Retention/detention standards for all new development; 9 (b) Water Quality Standards at least equivalent to the minimum requirements 10 of either the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual,or other 11 substantially equivalent standards that may be required for compliance 12 with the Endangered Species Act. 13 Establishing new retention/detention standards is an action that may require 14 the amendment of existing code by the Parties' legislative bodies. 15 3. Plan Recommendation 3: Establish a Monitoring Program to Determine the 16 Effectiveness of Implemented Plan Actions. The Parties will provide for a 17 basinwide monitoring program as described in the Plan and in Agreement 18 section V.B.3., and in a scope of work and cost share arrangement to be 19 attached to this agreement as Exhibit Two and included herein. The Basin 20 Committee will review the monitoring program annually, and may revise the 21 scope of work and/or cost share arrangement. 22 4. Plan Recommendation 9: Work Cooperatively to Protect the City of Renton 23 Drinking Water Supply. King County and Newcastle will work with Renton 24 to implement actions to protect water quality in aquifer recharge areas within 25 their jurisdictions. 26 5. Plan Recommendations 12, and 13: Place Large Woody Debris in May Creek 27 in May Creek Canyon; and Plant Conifers Throughout the Riparian Area in 28 May Creek Canyon. The Parties will implement these recommendations as 29 cooperatively conducted capital projects. 30 6. Recommendation 17. Require Full Mitigation for Future In in Zoning 31 Density in Areas Draining to May Valley. Each Party will implement this 32 recommendation in order to minimize stormwater runoff flows from new 33 development. Each Party will notify the other Parties whenever considering a 34 zoning change in an area draining to May Creek. Changing the zoning of a 35 parcel only requires action by the Parties' respective legislative bodies. 36 B. King County Responsibilities 37 1. Plan Recommendation 1:Establish and Enforce Requirements for Runoff 38 Retention/Detention, Forest Retention, and Water Quality Facilities for Site 39 Development. King County will implement Forest Retention Standards, as 40 described in the Plan, for development projects in all rurally zoned lands. 5 1 2. Recommendation 2: Develop Basin Stewardship, Public Involvement, and 2 Education Opportunities for Residents and Stakeholders Through the 3 Creation of a May Creek Basin Steward. Subject to its annual budget 4 process, King County will provide staff to serve as the Basin Steward for the 5 May Creek Basin area. The Steward will provide services as specifically 6 requested by Renton and Newcastle in their incorporated areas and as staff 7 availability allows; costs will be charged to the Cities only for services 8 provided. 9 3. Plan Recommendation 3:Establish a Monitoring Program to Determine the 10 Effectiveness of Implemented Plan Actions. King County will act as lead for 11 implementing the monitoring program. A scope of work and cost share 12 arrangement for a basinwide monitoring program will be approved by the 13 Basin Committee for each year of plan implementation. This scope of work 14 and cost share arrangement between the Parties will be attached to this 15 Agreement as Exhibit Two and included herein. 16 4. Recommendation 10. Facilitate Permitting for May Creek Delta Dredging. 17 King County will work cooperatively with Renton in providing technical 18- assistance for permitting activities as needed and as resources allow. 19 5. Plan Recommendation 14: Improve Lake Boren Water Quality. Newcastle 20 will serve as lead implementing agency. King County will work 21 cooperatively with the City to provide technical assistance for Lake Boren 22 management activities as needed and as resources allow. 23 6. Recommendation 18: Reduce the Potential for Negative Water Quality 24 Impacts Originating at the Basin's Quarry Sites. King County will 25 coordinate implementation of this recommendation in conjunction with other 26 King County and State agencies. 27 7. Recommendation 11: Stabilize the Slopes at the Most Significant Erosion Sites 28 in May Creek Canyon Related to Surface Water Runoff Discharges 29 King County will coordinate with Renton in assisting the development and 30 implementation of Recommendation 11. King County will provide technical 31 support,conceptual and/or final design review as requested by the City of 32 Renton and as staff availability allows. 33 8. King County will implement the following Plan recommendations, including 34 any necessary conceptual analysis,project design,project permitting, and 35 construction: 36 (a) Plan Recommendation 4: Provide Cost-sharing and Technical 37 Assistance for Flood Protection in May Valley; 38 (b) Plan Recommendation S:Remove Flow Obstructions from the Channel of 39 May Creek in May Valley; 40 (c) Recommendation 6: Restore Flows Diverted from Tributary 0294 back 41 into Tibbetts Creek; 42 (d) Recommendation 7: Enlarge the Culvert under S.E. May Valley Road at 43 the E. Fork of May Creek; 6 I (e) Recommendation 8: Protect Habitat at the Confluence of May Creek and 2 Its Tributary Streams within King County. 3 C. Renton Responsibilities 4 I. Plan Recommendation 9: Work"Cooperatively to Protect the City of Renton 5 Drinking Water Supply. Renton will have primary responsibility for 6 establishing a wellhead protection program and other drinking water supply 7 protection activities. 8 2. Plan Recommendation 10: Facilitate Permitting for May Creek Delta 9 Dredging. Renton will expedite processing of any city-required permits 10 related to this activity, and will provide technical assistance to the property I 1 owner as needed and as resources allow. 12 3. Plan Recommendation II:Stabilize the Slopes at the Most Significant Erosion 13 Sites in May Creek Canyon Related to Surface Water Runoff Discharges. 14 Renton will act as lead agency for implementing projects, within Renton, 15 associated with Recommendation 11. Renton will be responsible for any 16 planning,permitting,design and construction of any projects,within Renton, 17 associated with the implementation of Recommendation 11. Renton will 18 coordinate with King County in the implementation of this shared project. 19 D. Newcastle Responsibilities 20 1. Newcastle will implement the following Plan recommendations,including any 21 necessary conceptual analysis,project design,project permitting, and 22 construction: 23 (a) Plan Recommendation 14: Improve Lake Boren Water Quality, 24 (b) Plan Recommendation 1 S: Improve Boren Creek Fish Passage at S.E. 25 89`h Place; 26 (c) Plan Recommendation 16. Improve the Newcastle Railroad Embankment 27 Outlet 28 29 VI. Costs 30 A. May Creek Basin Committee: 31 Each Party will fund its own staffs participation in the Basin Committee, as 32 described in agreement section V.A.I. 33 B. Shared Costs: 34 1. King County and Renton will be responsible for their cost shares incurred 35 through the implementation of Plan Recommendations 10 and 11. Cost shares 36 are listed in agreement Exhibit One. Provision of each jurisdiction's cost share 37 contribution for implementation of Recommendation 11 may be made through 38 "in-kind" staff services, as agreed to by Renton and King County. 39 2. King County,Newcastle, and Renton will be responsible for their individual 40 cost shares through the implementation of Plan Recommendations 12 and 13. 41 Cost shares are listed in agreement Exhibit One. 7 1 3. Should implementation considerations lead to changes to the scope of work 2 for any shared project, the implementing jurisdictions shall review and 3 approve any changes including any changes to project cost or timeline. Each 4 jurisdiction's implementation funding is subject to the budget appropriations 5 process of each jurisdiction's legislative(Council)body. Changes to the scope 6 of work that alter the cost shares shown in Exhibit One will be attached to this 7 agreement and incorporated as amendments hereto. 8 C. Independent Program Costs: 9 1. Implementation costs for Plan Recommendations 4, 5, 6,7, 8, and 18 will be 10 the responsibility of King County and are subject to King County's annual 11 budget process. 12, 2. Implementation costs for Plan Recommendations 14, 15 and 16 will be the 13 responsibility of Newcastle and are subject to the City's annual budget 14 process. 15 D. Plan Recommendations 1, 9, and 17 are recommendations for implementation of 16 regulatory standards to protect water quality in the May Creek Basin which have 17 no direct program cost. 18 E. Cost shares for implementing a May Creek Basin monitoring program under Plan 19 Recommendation 3: A scope of work including jurisdictional cost-shares for 20 implementing a May Creek Basin monitoring program according to Plan 21 Recommendation 3 will be established by mutual agreement of the Parties and 22 attached to this agreement as Exhibit Two. The maximum cost-shares for 23 monitoring are shown in Exhibit One under Recommendation 3. The Basin 24 Committee will review the monitoring program annually, and may revise the 25 scope of work and/or cost share arrangement. However, any proposed revisions 26 to the monitoring program which increase the cost shares to any party beyond the 27 maximum cost shares shown in Exhibit One, will only be implemented through a 28 separate written amendment to this agreement per Agreement section VIII.D. 29 30 VH. Billing and Payment 31 A. For Basin Steward activities requested by Newcastle or Renton under Plan 32 Recommendation 2,King County shall bill the Party requesting Basin Steward 33. services quarterly on itemized invoices for the cost of the requested Basin 34 Steward activities. The Parties shall review and approve the invoices and forward 35 payment to King County within 60 days of receipt of the invoice. 36 B. King County shall bill the Parties according to cost share agreements as shown in 37 agreement Exhibit One related to implementation of Plan Recommendations 3, 38 12, and 13. 39 40 C. . The City of Renton shall bill King County for costs related to the implementation 41 of Recommendation 11. King County will provide documentation for in-kind 42 staff services provided if replacing cash payment for King County's cost share. 43 s I VIII. Duration,Termination,and Amendment 2 The Parties agree to the following: 3 A. This agreement is effective upon signature by the Parties and will remain in effect 4 until December 31,2005,or until all capital improvement project primary 5 recommendations have been completed,whichever is later. 6 B. Participation in this agreement may be terminated by any individual Party with 7 120 days written notice.This agreement may be terminated by written agreement 8 of all the Parties. 9 C. Should any Party choose to terminate its participation in this agreement, said 10 Party will be responsible for all previously agreed upon shared costs for project(s) 11 which have been initiated but which are not complete upon termination. 12 D. This agreement may be amended, altered, clarified, or extended only by the 13 written agreement of the Parties hereto. 14 E. This agreement is not assignable by any Party to this agreement,either in whole 15 or in part. 16 F. This agreement is the complete expression of the terms hereto; and any oral or 17 written representations or understandings not incorporated herein are excluded. 18 The Parties recognize that time is of the essence in the performance of the 19 provisions of this agreement. Waiver of any default shall not be deemed to be 20 waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of this 21 agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach 22 and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of the agreement 23 unless stated to be such through written approval by the Parties which shall be 24 attached to the original agreement. 25 26 IX. Counterparts 27 This agreement may be executed in counterparts. 9 I X. Indemnification and Hold Harmless 2 The Parties agree to the following: 3 Each Party shall protect, defend,indemnify, and save harmless the other Parties, 4 their officers, officials,employees,,and agents,while acting within the scope of 5 their employment as such, from any and all costs,claims,judgments, and/or 6 awards of damages, arising out of or in any way resulting from each Parry's own 7 negligent acts or omissions. Each Party agrees that its obligations under this 8 subparagraph extend to any claim, demand, and/or cause of action brought by, or 9 on behalf of, any of its employees or agents. For this purpose,each Party,by 10 mutual negotiation,hereby waives,with respect to the other Parties only, any 11 - immunity that would otherwise be available against such claims under the 12 Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW. In the event that a Party incurs 13 any judgment, award, and/or cost arising therefrom,including attorneys' fees, to 14 enforce the provisions of this Article, all such fees,expenses, and costs shall be 15 recoverable from the responsible Party to the extent of that Party's culpability. 16 17 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on 18 the_ day of=5 f , 2001. 19 20 21 Approved as to Form: King County: 22 23 24 By: By: 25 26 J�cu 224z-4 x 27 Title: Title: 28 29 30 31 Approved as to Form: City of Newcastle: 32 33 34 By: By: 35 36 37 Title: Title: 38 39 40 Approved as to Form: City of Renton: 41 42 43 By: By: 44 45 46 Title: Title: 47 10 I X: Indemnification and Hold Harmless 2 The Parties agree to the following: 3 Each Party shall protect,defend,indemnify,and save harmless the other Parties, 4 their officers, officials,employees, and agents,while acting within the scope of 5 their employment as such, from any and all costs, claims,judgments,and/or 6 awards of damages, arising out of or in any way resulting from each Parry's own 7 negligent acts or omissions. Each Party agrees that its obligations under this 8 subparagraph extend to any claim,demand, and/or cause of action brought by, or 9 on behalf of, any of its employees or agents. For this purpose, each Party,by 10 mutual negotiation,hereby waives,with respect to the other Parties only, any 11 immunity that would otherwise be available against such claims under the 12 Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW. In the event that a Party incurs 13 any judgment, award, and/or cost arising therefrom,including attorneys' fees, to 14 enforce the provisions of this Article, all such fees, expenses, and costs shall be 15 recoverable from the responsible Party to the extent of that Parry's culpability. 16 17 IN WITNESS WHEREOF; the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on . 18 the 19 day of s'f k--L-e-C 20 21 22 Approved as to Form: King County: 23 24 25 By: By: 26 27- 28 Title: _ Title: _ 29 30 31 32 Approved as to Form: City of Newcastle: 33 34 ' 35 By: 36 37 e i 38 Title: _ Title: C _ 39 40 41 Approved as to Form: City of Renton: 42 43 44 _ By: By: 45 46 47 Title: _ Title: _ 48 - 10 I X. Indemnification and Hold Harmless 2 The Parties agree to the following: 3 Each Party shall protect, defend,indemnify, and save harmless the other Parties, 4 their officers,officials,employees,and agents,while acting within the scope of 5 their employment as such,from any and all costs,claims,judgments, and/or 6 awards of damages, arising out of or in any way resulting from each Party's own 7 negligent acts or omissions. Each Party agrees that its obligations"under this 8 subparagraph extend to any claim, demand, and/or cause of action brought by, or 9 on behalf of, any of its employees or agents. For this purpose,each Party,by 10 mutual negotiation,hereby waives,with respect to the other Parties only, any 11 immunity that would otherwise be available against such claims under the 12 Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW. In the event that a Party incurs 13 any judgment, award, and/or cost arising therefrom,including attorneys' fees,to 14 enforce the provisions of'this Article, all such fees, expenses,and costs shall be 15 recoverable from the responsible Party to the extent of that Party's culpability. 16 17 IN W S WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on 18 the day of gp{�- -r ,2001. 19 20 21 Approved as to Form: King County: 22 23 24 By: By: 25 26 27 Title: Title: 28 29 30 31 Approved as to Form: City of Newcastle: 32 33 34 By: By: 35 36 37 Title: Title: 38 39 40 Approved a orm: City of Renton: 41 42 43 By: By: 44 celsse Tanner 45 46 Title: Renton City Attorney Title: Mayor 47 l ATTEST: .r✓ Marilyn J. tersen, City Clerk 10 Exhibit One May Creek Basin Action Plan Implementation Actions Implementing Total King County Newcastle Renton Cost Basinwide Recommendations Agency Estimated Cost Share Cost Share Share Project Cost 1. Establish and Enforce Requirements for Runoff King Co. WLRD, Not Retention/Detention,Forest Retention,and Water Renton,Newcastle Applicable - - Quality Facilities for Site Development. The Parties will work to: ♦ Establish appropriate retention/detention standards for all new development in the Basin; ♦ Enforce appropriate forest retention standards; and Enact basin-wide water quality standards that are at least equivalent to the minimum requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 2 Develop Basin Stewardship,Public Involvement,and King Co. WLRD, Up to Up to Costs to be Costs to be Education Opportunities for Residents and Renton, Newcastle $300,000 $300,000 paid by paid by Stakeholders Through the Creation of a May Creek (Up to (Will fund Newcastle as Renton as city Basin Steward. $60,000 Steward city requests requests The Basin Steward shall: annually for 5- annually, services, services. ♦ work cooperatively with residents and businesses in years.) subject to May Valley and King County permitting and technical budget staff to implement Plan Recommendations; authority.) ♦ coordinate volunteer and educational activities; and ♦ act as point of contact for basin needs and issues for residents, businesses,and King County,Newcastle, Renton,and other key governments in the Basin. ? Establish a Monitoring Program Focused on King Co. WLRD, Up to Up to Up to$55,000 Up to $55,000 Determining the Effectiveness of Implemented Plan Renton, Newcastle $330,000 $220,000 (Up to (Up to Actions. (Up to (Up to 44,000 $11,000per $11,000 per Develop a monitoring program, including scientific $66,000 per per year for 5- year for 5- year for 5- monitoring of physical, chemical,and biological year for 5- years to be years to be years to be factors of Basin resources to determine Basin health, years to be determined determined determined impacts of activities, and the effectiveness of Plan determined annually.) annually.) annually.) recommendations as they are implemented. annually.) - 1 May Creek Basin Action Plan Implementation Actions Exhibit One Implementing Total King County Newcastle Renton Cost May Valley Subarea Agency Estimated Cost Share Cost Share Share Pro ect Cost 4 Provide Cost-sharing and Technical Assistance for King Co. DNR $600,000+ $600,000 $0 $0 Flood Protection in May Valley. Implement flood-proofing measures in May Valley by conducting projects to protect homes, businesses, Projects to include the following: ♦ Working with landowner to pursue individual flood reduction actions; and Buyout of frequently flooded homes in May Valley wetland where no other remedies can be found; and ♦ Conducting habitat improvement projects in the floodplain to reduce flooding on adjacent property; and ♦ Exploring opportunities to obtain additional state and federal funding for flood buyout projects. 5 Remove Flow Obstructions from the Channel of King Co. WLRD, Up to Up to $0 $0 May Creek hi May Valley. $350,000 $3509000 Working with landowners and permitting agencies, King County will conduct pilot program to remove channel blockages in May Valley. The goal of this recommendation is to remove typical blockages including beaver dams, sediment deposits,and channel blocking vegetation. The pilot program will conduct clearing of the low-flow channel to improve the drawdown of flood waters in May Valley. 6 Restore Flows Diverted from Tributary 0294 back King Co. WLRD Undetermined Undetermined $0 $0 into Tibbetts Creek basin. King County will work with City of Issaquah and the owner of the former Sunset Quarry to pursue relocation of flows from a 200-acre catchment now draining to May Creek which appears to have historically been tributary to Tibbetts Creek,but which has been redirected to May Creek. 2 Exhibit One May Creek Basin Action Plan Implementation Actions Implementing Total King County Newcastle Renton Cost May Valley Subarea Agency Estimated Cost Share Cost Share Share Project Cost 7 Enlarge the Culvert at SE May Valley Road at E. King Co. DOT $50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 Fork May Creek. The new and larger culvert will improve conveyance and fish passage. 9 8 Protect Habitat at the Confluence of May Creek and King Co. WLRD $25,000+ $25,000+ $0 $0 Its Tributary Streams. (likely to cost (likely to cost Protect high quality spawning areas, located at the 50,000-80,000 50,000-80,000 mouths of May Creek tributary streams,from siltation for project of for project of through the placement of large woody debris or rock the complexity the complexity stabilization structures upstream of these areas. This recommended recommended recommendation would begin with a pilot project at one in plan) in plan) site, which could serve as a model for similar projects in the rest of the Basin. Implementing Total King County Newcastle Renton Cost Agency Estimated Cost Share Cost Share Share Lower Basin Subarea Project Cost \ 9 Work cooperatively to protect the City of Renton Renton as lead agency, Within Within Within Within drinking water supply. in cooperation with budgeted staff budgeted staff budgeted staff budgeted staff Establish a Wellhead Protection Program, identify King Co. WLRD and time. time. time. time. pollutant sources, and implement, with the cooperation Newcastle. of adjacent jurisdictions and the private sector, a program to protect the groundwater system. 1v Facilitate Permitting for May Creek Delta Renton as lead agency, Within Within $0 Within Dredging. in cooperation with budgeted staff budgeted staff budgeted staff Assist the property owner at the May Creek Delta in King Co. WLRD. time. time. time. Lake Washington obtain permits needed for future dredging of sediment from the delta. 11 Stabilize the Slopes at the Most Significant Erosion King Co. WLRD, $550,000 $75,000 $0 $475,000 Sites in May Creek Canyon Related to Surface Renton Runoff Discharges. Implement a program of improved surface water conveyance and landslide control measures at sites along May and Honey Creeks to reduce slope failure,erosion,and sedimentation. 3 Exhibit One May Creek Basin Action Plan Implementation Actions Implementing Total King County Newcastle Renton Cost Agency Estimated Cost Share Cost Share Share Lower Basin Subarea Project Cost 12 Place Large Woody Debris in May Creek in May King Co. WLRD, $225,000(an $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 Creek Canyon. Renton, Newcastle additional Large woody debris will provide increased stream grant of channel protection and aquatic habitat and will reduce $50,000 has sediment delivery to the May Creek delta. also been approved by the Lake Washington Watershed Forum and may expand scope of work) 13 Plant Conifers Throughout the Riparian Area in King Co. WLRD, Up to Up to Up to Up to May Creek Canyon. Renton, Newcastle $30,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Improve bank stability and protect and repair stream- side and in-stream habitat along lower portions of the creek,below river mile 3.9 by: ♦ Planting conifers throughout the riparian area ♦ Thinning existing deciduous understory vegetation in places to promote growth of new plantings. 14 Improve Lake Boren Water Quality Newcastle, (in $30,000 $0 $30,000 $0 Expand the citizen-based water quality monitoring and conjunction with Coal stewardship program to collect water quality data for Creek Utility District), the lake, improve public education regarding water King Co. WLRD quality, and begin small-scale improvement actions. 15 Improve Boren Creek Fish Passage at SE 891 Place. Newcastle Up to $0 Up to $0 Improve fish access to upstream areas of Boren Creek $150,000 $150,000 by replacing existing culvert with a bridge or open bottom culvert. 4 Exhibit One May Creek Basin Action Plan Implementation Actions Implementing Total King County Newcastle Renton Cost Agency Estimated Cost Share Cost Share Share Lower Basin Subarea Pro ect Cost 16 Improve the Newcastle Railroad Embankment Newcastle $70,000+ $0 $70,000+ $0 Outlet. maintenance maintenance The embankment currently collects water and poses a costs costs hazard should the embankment fail. Replace the outlet structure, monitor the pond level and establish an emergency plan in case of failure. East Renton Plateau and Implementing Total King County Newcastle Renton Cost Agency Estimated Cost Share Cost Share Share Highlands Subareas Project Cost 17 Require Full Mitigation for Future Increases in King Co., Newcastle, Not applicable Zoning Density in Areas Draining to May Valley. and Renton For areas of the basin draining to May Valley, zoning densities should not be increased,unless a qualified hydrologic analysis demonstrates that their impacts on surface water conditions can be fully mitigated. Density bonuses provided under development incentive programs should not be approved for these areas. 18 Reduce the Potential for Negative Water Quality King Co. WLRD and Included in Included in Not applicable Not Impacts Originating at the Basin's Quarry Sites. DDES, in cooperation proposed proposed applicable Ensure that the Basin's closed quarry sites are with state agencies Basin Steward Basin Steward reclaimed in a technically sound manner that protects activities. activities, resource quality and that any future quarrying activity is undertaken in compliance with existing water quality standards. Develop a strategy to provide improved enforcement, technical assistance, and/or incentives to quarry operators to improve operating practices and reclamation techniques to minimize impacts on surface water quantity and quality. Total estimated cost-shares for all plan recommendations $2,710,000 $390,00 $615,000 Abbreviations: King Co.DDES "King County Department of Development and Environmental Services WLAD "King County Water and Land Resources King Co,DNR "King County Department of Natural Resources Parks "King County Depertnnnt of Parks and Recreation King Co.DOT "King County Department of Transportation 5 I , r Exhibit Two 2001 May Creek Monitoring Plan Scope of Work and Cost-share Arrangement MONITORING PLAN The overall goals of the May Creek Monitoring Plan are:to evaluate the effectiveness of the May Creek Basin Action Plan in protecting human safety,property,and aquatic habitat;to assess the overall health of the watershed,and;to provide information to aid in future management issues. Monitoring activities will focus on evaluating the May Creek Action Plan's key priority projects and management strategies and will be designed to answer the following questions that are directly related to the goals of the May Creek Action Plan: 1. Is water quality staying the same,improving or declining? 2. Are existing problems(e.g.,high flows,erosion and sedimentation)getting better or getting worse? 3. Are streambanks stabilized and erosion/sedimentation reduced? 4. What are the current conditions of fish and wildlife habitat,and are they staying the same,improving or declining? Monitoring data and analysis will determine if recommended strategies have been implemented and have achieved basin plan goals,- and changes,if any,will be recommended.Monitoring activities will be prioritized and evaluated by the May Creek Basin Committee with input from the WRIA forum and citizens within the watershed. Monitoring activities will be undertaken in order of priority,as time and funding allows. These activities may be performed by King County,or may be performed by other agencies involved in the Basin,or by interagency partnerships. CURRENT ACTIVITIES Four categories of monitoring activities are currently carried out in the May Creek Basin and listed in Table 1. The section below the table describes the activities in more detail. Table 1. May Creek monitoring activities and sites. 1.Hydrology M Yes 2,3 Two stream gauges now located at the mouth of May Creek and Coal Creek Parkway continued. 2.Water Quality Yes 1,2,3,4 One current ambient water quality monitoring site(#0440)is located at the mouth of May Creek. 3.Small Lakes Yes 1,2,3,4 Lake Boren and Lake Kathleen are part of Monitoring the King County Volunteer Lake Program. Further assistance available to Newcastle at their request. 4. Fish Surveys Yes 4 Volunteer salmon-program watching provides data on spawning salmon.Data are collected by volunteers on May Creek. Program is separately funded. 1 Exhibit Two 1. HYDROLOGY Purpose Stream gauges are commonly used to gauge the flow in streams in areas where development will or has occurred.. Stream gauges are also located downstream of hydrologic projects such as retention/detention facilities in order to determine if the facility is operating as designed. Information from both stream and rain gauges is used to calibrate hydrologic models such as to: 1)estimate future flows in watersheds based on various development scenarios;2)estimate needed capacity for capital projects and retention/detention facilities;and,3)when combined with water quality data,estimate pollutant loadings to a waterbody. In addition,gauges are used to accumulate flow data to improve computation of flood magnitude return intervals. Examples of specific management questions answered using information from hydrological monitoring include: • What are the magnitudes of flood and base flows in particular streams or tributaries? Are flood magnitudes or frequency- increasing? Is base flow decreasing? • Is increased flooding or decreased base flow correlated to management activities in the basin or tributaries? • What are existing flooding thresholds in a particular area? - • Are Capital Improvement Projects(CIPs)and small habitat restoration projects having cumulative beneficial impact on reducing erosion and flooding? King County currently maintains a network of approximately 140 monitoring gauges throughout King County. Two types of gauges are used to collect information. One type is a flow gauge,which is used to measure and record stream stage to indicate stream flow through the stage-discharge relationship. The second type is a rain gauge,which is used to measure and record precipitation. Two flow gauges and two rain gauges are currently located in the May Creek Basin. • 37A:May Creek flow gauge at Mouth since Nov 1988 • 37B:May Creek flow gauge at Coal Creek Parkway since March 1988 • 37U:Lower May Creek Rain Gauge since Oct 1989 • 37V:Upper May Creek Rain Gauge since Oct 1988 2. WATER QUALITY Purpose Water quality data are used to identify water quality problems resulting from non-point And/or point source pollution. Data can provide insight into the effectiveness of regulations and watershed management actions,as well as a direct measure of environmental indicators(e. g.,miles of King County streams supporting Class A and AA uses). Water quality sampling is conducted in areas where extreme water quality degradation is a concern and where cumulative changes from upstream watershed activities will manifest themselves. Intensive water quality studies will not be proposed unless the initial reconnaissance storm sampling or ambient water quality sampling indicates serious problems exist. The primary sample collection method consists of grab samples taken during storm flow or low flows. Examples of management questions answered by May Creek water quality data are: III • Is urban non-point pollution(sediment,nutrients,toxins,metals,etc.)a significant contribution to water quality degradation in May Creek? • Does May Creek water quality support beneficial uses(e.g.,Class A or AA standards)? Water Quality sampling is conducted by the King County Environmental Lab as part of the ambient water quality monitoring program_ A sampling site near gauge 37A on May Creek has been tested since January 4, 1972 through September 12,2000. Data for this site can be found in the Lab's LIMS database under Locator#0440. 2 Exhibit Two Another site on the Renton-Issaquah Rd before SE May Valley Rd(locator#Y0440)was also sampled from January through December in 1978 generating 13 data sets. - Water and sediment samples are collected as part of thisprogiam.Additional parameters have been added over time. The following data have been collected: Nutrients Total Metals(From ICP scan) Chlorinated Herbicides Total phosphorus(TP) Antimony 2,4,5-T Ortho-Phosphorus(OP) Arsenic 2,4,5-TP(Silvex) Total Nitrogen(TN) Barium 2,4-D Nitrite+Nitrate-Nitrogen(NO2+NO3-N) Beryllium 2,4-DB Ammonia-Nitrogen(NH3-N) Cadmium Calcium Fuel-related Parameters Miscellaneous Parameters Chromium Diesel Hardness Cobalt Gas Total Suspended Sediments(TSS) Copper Lube Oil Turbidity Iron pH Lead Biological Constituents Ambient air temperature Magnesium Fecal Coliform Ambient water temperature Molybdenum Enterococcus Conductivity Nickel E.Coli Dissolved Oxygen(Winkler) Selenium Total Solids Silver Staff height Thallium Discharge Vanadium Pebble Counts Zinc 3. SMALL LAKES MONITORING Purpose Through the Lake Stewardship Program,volunteers collect baseline data on over 45 lakes in King County to assess long-term water quality trends,assess seasonal and water column variability,identify water quality problems and.propose further investigation and/or direct solutions. The program is split into two levels of data collection efforts:Level I and Level U. The Level I program participants measure surface water temperature,precipitation,lake level,color,and Secchi depth(clarity). The Level II program participants measure all Level I parameters,plus nutrients,chlorophyll a,phytoplankton,alkalinity,dissolved oxygen and hardness. Examples of questions answered by.lake volunteer monitoring efforts are: • What is the current trophic(productivity)status of the lake? Has the status changed? • Are land use activities around the lake changing the trophic status of the lake? • Have lake levels changed over time? Do lake levels fluctuate widely? • Is recreational use of the lake affected by algal blooms or aquatic plant growth? • Are basin residents committed to long term stewardship and development of a lake management plan? Both Lake Kathleen and Lake Boren in the May Creek watershed are part of King County's Lake Stewardship Program. 3 Exhibit Two 4. SALMON WATCHER PROGRAM Purpose In 1996,the Bellevue Stream Team,King County Water and Land Resources Division,the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe,the Snohomish County Surface Water Management Division,and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife began a volunteer spawning survey program in the Lake Washington Watershed(all waters draining through the Ballard Locks). In 1997,the program evolved into the Salmon Watcher Program and has been conducted annually since.The purpose of the program is to document the distribution of spawning adult salmon throughout the basin via an active public outreach and education program,and subsequently consolidate all the information into a single resource.These data can be used by resource managers and the public to improve how streams are managed,to protect salmon and trout species,and to enhance their habitat. Examples of questions answered by salmon volunteer monitoring efforts are: Which species of salmon spawn in May Creek? Where and when do salmon spawn in May Creek? This year,two volunteers will observe,identify and count spawning salmon in May Creek. In 1996,three volunteers observed and surveyed salmon in May Creek..A total of 1088 live and 124 dead sockeye were counted; 3 live chinook;8 live coho;and 3 live unidentified fish. In 1997:a pair of volunteers watched for a total of 14 surveys and saw no fish. In 1998 and 1999:no volunteers watched May Creek. Costs of monitoring activities currently carried out in the May Creek Basin and funded by King County are summarized in Table 2. Table 2. Current May Creek monitoring costs. 1. Hydrology $6,489 Current level of activity—two stream gauges and two rain gauges. 2. Water Quality $18,390 Current level of activity—one site. 3.Small Lakes Monitoring $22,397 Current level of activity—two lakes. 4.Salmon Watcher Volunteer Program - N/A(volunteer program data administered separately)Current level of a tivity. CURRENT ANNUAL COST $47,276 4 Exhibit Two ADDITIONAL PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Additional monitoring activities will be necessary to fully implement and evaluate the effectiveness of the May Creek Basin Plan. The additional monitoring activities are intended to answer questions that are directly related to the goals of the May Creek Action Plan but cannot be answered with the current monitoring activities.. All monitoring activities will focus on evaluating the May Creek Action Plan's key priority projects and management strategies. They will be divided up into two categories of activities,"Long term"and"Short term". "Long term"activities will be undertaken on a regular basis every year or every two years,depending on the activity. "Short term or special study activities"may be undertaken at periodic intervals as short-term projects such as CIPs or habitat improvement projects are undertaken. Most of these activities are assumed to occur as components of the capital projects recommended in the May Creek Basin Plan. Table 3 below shows the additional monitoring activities and costs. The section below Table 3 describes the additional monitoring recommendations with rationale. Table 3. May Creek monitoring activities with additional monitoring recommendations and costs 1. Maintain two stream gauges at the 4 $6,489 $15,020 $21,509 $12,309 Hydrology mouth of May Creek and Coal Creek Parkway. Maintain two rain gauges. (fixed costs =$9aft NEW Add two new stream gauges: annual costs at the mouth of Boren Creek,and at =$5,820) the mouth of Country Creek below Licorice Fern development; Long Term 2. One ambient water quality 1,2,3,4, $18,390 $18,390 $18,390 Water monitoring site(#0440)is located at Quality the mouth of May Creek and will be continued. Long Term 3. Maintain at current levels 2,3 $22,397 $22,397 $22,397 Small Lakes Long Term Monitoring 4. Maintain and recruit more May 2,3 - - - Volunteer Creek volunteers. Fish Long Term Surveys 5. Proposed for King Count Habitat 4 - Costs proposed N/A Ravine Pre- Restoration Team(HRT)Prog. to be carried by project Spring 2001 as baseline info for WA state HRT Habitat and LWD projects. funding Fisheries Short Term Surveys TOTAL W-23 6 1 020 $62,296 5$_3 0�6 5 • Exhibit Two HYDROLOGY In order to adequately characterize flows in May Creek,two additional stream gauges are recommended.The gauges would be sited at the mouth of Boren Creek and at the mouth of Country Creek below Licorice Fern development. The gauges would provide data to address the following questions: • What are the magnitudes of flood and base flows in these tributaries to May Creek? Are flood magnitudes or frequency increasing? Is base flow decreasing? • Is increased flooding or decreased base flow correlated to management activities in the tributaries? • What are existing flooding thresholds in these areas? • Are Capital Improvement Projects(CIPs)and small habitat restoration projects having cumulative beneficial impact on reducing erosion and flooding? The data would answer the questions:are flood magnitudes or frequency increasing and are base flows decreasing? WATER QUALITY Past storm sample data will be reviewed to determine if previous sampling and current sampling are adequate to characterize conditions and document problems associated with non-point and/or point source pollution. Additional water quality sampling sites may be recommended for a year of reconnaissance storm sampling to adequately characterize water quality in areas of likely problem areas:May Creek at Coal Creek Pkwy,mouth of Boren Creek,and mouth of Honey Creek.A long-term intensive water quality study will not be proposed unless the initial reconnaissance storm sampling or ambient water quality sampling indicates serious problems exist. LAKE STEWARDSHIP Lake Kathleen and Lake Boren in the May Creek watershed will continue volunteer activities as part of King County's Lake Stewardship Program. SALMON WATCH May Creek volunteers will continue their activities in the Salmon Watch Program. Local jurisdiction may be asked to assist in volunteer recruitment. Salmon Watch data can be used by citizens and local resource managers to manage and protect salmon and trout areas in the May Creek Basin. MAY CREEK RAVINE MONITORING AND ASSESMENT (Project Monitoring and Special Study Monitoring Activities) Monitoring and assessment of particular projects such as CIPs,small habitat projects,woody debris placements,etc.,will be undertaken as priority projects are implemented and funding allows. Project-monitoring activities will be conducted to evaluate the success and effectiveness of a particular project,i.e.,did the project meet intended goals? Some project monitoring will address more specific and geographically localized questions such as: Is the CIP having a cumulative beneficial impact on aquatic habitat and stream function? Are habitat enhancement projects reducing erosion and flooding,improving fish habitat,and preventing further degradation of the aquatic systems? Project monitoring activities will be undertaken in order of priority,as time and funding allows. These activities may not be performed by King County,but may be performed by the cities of Renton and/or Newcastle or other agencies involved in the Basin. 6 Exhibit Two Project monitoring activities usually consist of pre-monitoring and post-monitoring. Pre-monitoring activities are usually carried out before the project to assess the baseline conditions that will be expected to change or improve after the project is implemented. Pre-project monitoring data will be used for project design and permitting. Post-project monitoring activities are usually carved out after tompletion of the project and for a variable number of years depending on the goals of the project and the monitoring as well as permitting requirements.Post-project monitoring data will be analyzed and reported after completion of the project and/or post-project monitoring. The post-monitoring costs are not included here. Habitat enhancement of the lower May Creek ravine has been recommended in the May Creek Basin Action Plan. Pre-project monitoring will be necessary for project design and permitting of the project. Fisheries and habitat surveys would be carried out in the May Creek Ravine to fully characterize the fisheries use(species and life stages)in the ravine,as well as document existing habitat conditions. Project design would utilize the data to determine where and what type of enhancements(e.g.,woody debris placement)would be optimal for which species and life stages of fish. SUMMARY The May Creek Monitoring Plan and all activities carved out in this plan should provide information needed to meet,make,alter, and evaluate watershed management decisions which derive from the actions taken as implementation of the basin plan. Proposed Cost-share Arrangement for May Creek Basin Action Plan Monitoring(recommendation#3): 2001 2002+ 2001 2002+ 2001 2002+ 2001 2002+ Hydrology $9,333 $4,103 $6,088 $4,103 $6,088 $4,103 $21,509 $12,309 Water Quality 12,260 6,130 3,065 6,130 3065 6,130 18,390 18,390 Volunteer Lake Monitors 22,397 22,397 - - - - 22,397 22,397 Salmon Watcher Separately Separately Pro funded funded - - - - - Ravine Separately Separately channel/habitat funded funded survey - - - " Total Cost $43.990 IR 330 9.153 D231 9.153 19233 6$ 2296 This Cost-share Arrangement assumes that: ■ King County will bear all monitoring costs for ongoing monitoring activities through 2°d Quarter 2001,and costs for 3`d and 4`h quarters will be prorated and cost-shared by the three jurisdictions. ■ Additional hydrological monitoring costs will be accrued beginning 7/1/2001 and will be shared evenly among all jurisdictions. • The two additional stream gauges included in these costs are not scoped to include telemetry functions • The scope of monitoring activities and their costs will be subject to regular review and potential change by the May Creek Basin Committee. These changes will be appended to the implementation Interlocal agreement once approved by the Basin Committee,and regarding costs,the parties they represent. 7 % CITY OF RENTON „LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department 10 Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 4,2001 Ms. Brandy Reed King Conservation District 935 Powell Avenue SW Renton,WA 98055 SUBJECT: KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT GRANT APPLICATIONS Dear Ms. Reed, Please find enclosed our revised 2001 King Conservation District Noncompetitive Grant Applications. These are applications for that portion of King Conservation District Special Assessment funds that are allocated to the City of Renton(per K.C.Ord.#12959)for 2001 and prior years. Per your request,we have clarified the budget associated with our previously submitted Grant Application proposals. In addition,we would like the Board to note that, if there is any discrepancy in the funding requested for the two proposed projects and the KCD funds available, (i.e.,due to uncertainties in collection of assessment),then we request that any shortfall or surplus be applied to the May Creek Basin Action Plan Implementation Grant application. Please let us know as soon as possible the results of the Board of Supervisors review. If there are any questions concerning any of the-applications meeting the criteria necessary for district funds to be granted,please contact Mike Dotson, Surface Water Utility Engineering Specialist, at 425-430-7392. Sincerely, ` l�)W re merman G gg Administrator cc: Mike Dotson Ronald Straka into 00 -725.doc\RJS\MDD\tb 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 J� 0 This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer tell(ell City of Renton King Conservation District Watershed Forum and Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Project Name: Edmonds Ave and Puget Drive—Seattle Contact(s): Mike Dotson Public Utility(SPU)Community Pocket Park Applicant: City of Renton Title: Engineer Specialist I11, Surface Water Utility Principal Partners: Seattle Public Utilities(SPU),Renton Address: 1055 South Grady Way, Neighborhood Council,and 51h Floor Treemendous Renton WA, 98055 Total Project Cost: $16, 000 Phone: 425-430-7392 KCD Funding Email: mdotson@ci.renton.wa.us Requested: $5,000 Project Start Date: September 2001 Fax: 425-430-7241 Project End Date: August 2002 1. Project Description: Planting and beautification of a Seattle Public Utilities-owned lot. This project would remove areas of impervious surfaces (asphalt and gravel—see attached photos,Exhibit A)and replace it with landscape and tree plantings. The lot has previously been a harbor for abandoned vehicles. Also, as a dumping ground the site offers a serious potential for pollutants to enter the watershed. The primary purpose of this project would be to eliminate the potential for pollutants to enter the watershed through the planting and development of a community pocket park for public use. The park will be signed with Kiosks that describe the watershed and the impact that activities within the watershed have on the aquatic environment. 2. Project Objectives: With the removal of impervious surface, installation of new landscape and plantings, and the partnering of public agencies and the community,this project will meet the criteria of Municipality and Watershed Forum Noncompetitive Grants. The following provides a brief description of specifically how the project meets one criteria, and the objectives, as set forth in each of the three required categories(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08: It is stated in the RCW 89.08.01 Preamble section 3: "That to conserve soil resources and control and prevent soil erosion and prevent flood water and sediment damages... it is necessary that land-use practices contributing to soil wastage and soil erosion be discouraged and discontinued,and appropriate soil-conserving land-use practices,and works of improvement for flood prevention of agricultural and nonagricultural phases of the conservation,development,utilization,and disposal of water be adopted and carried out; that among the procedures necessary for widespread adoption,are the carrying on of engineering operations such as the construction of terraces,terrace outlets, check-dams, desilting basins, flood water retarding structures, channel floodways, dikes,ponds, ditches, and the like; Page 1 H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-289.docWDD\tb 1 City of Renton . King Conservation District Watershed Forum and Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application the utilization of strip cropping,contour cultivating, and contour furrowing; land irrigation; seeding and planting of waste,sloping,abandoned,or eroded lands to water-conserving and erosion-preventing plants,trees,and grasses; forestation and reforestation; rotation of crops; soil stabilizations with trees,grasses,legumes,and other thick-growing,soil-holding crops,retardation of run-off by increasing absorption of rainfall; and retirement from cultivation of steep,highly erosive areas and areas now badly gullied or otherwise eroded." Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project meets the criteria as set forth in the above text through the restoration of the existing land use(impervious asphalt)to a condition of increased absorption of rainfall. This will be accomplished by the asphalt removal and planting of the impervious area with trees, shrubs and grasses. These actions will reduce runoff and improve water quality. KCD Strategic Plan Initiative: This proposal meets the strategic plan elements in multiple categories. It specifically addresses the criteria set forth in section 3,a(ii)which states; "...to conduct educational and demonstrational projects on any lands within the district upon obtaining the consent of the occupier of such lands and such necessary rights or interruption such lands as may be required in order to demonstrate by example the means,methods,measures,and works of improvement by which the conservation of renewable natural resources may be carried out"; This goal will be carried out by means of the community involvement and educational information located at the site. The educational component may include a description of watershed protection measures and principles, soil conservation practices, and vegetative resource conservation. This project will encourage and provide for community stewardship. Regional Task Force Funding Principles The regional task force funding principles satisfied by this proposal are as follows: RTF Funding Principle 1.b) "habitat restoration which enhances ecologically significant fish runs." Description of how this project meets these criteria: This project lies within the Cedar River Basin. The Cedar River is identified as a Salmon bearing river and is resident to Chinook salmon (listed as a threatened species). The removal of impervious surfaces, and planting of those areas with trees and grasses,will improve water quality within the watershed and,therefore, enhance the fish runs within the Cedar River Basin. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Phase I—Design Charette; Two(2)Evening design charetts for community park design. Treemendous will facilitate and organize two design charettes to gather community and municipal input on desired design elements for the pocket park. Phase II—Site Development: Develop site into a community pocket park based on the outcome of the design charette. This will be accomplished through volunteer labor. Grant monies will supply landscape, educational and plant materials. Page 2 H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-289.doc\MDD\tb :M IN •� e. � � II©`.- r' t, � ° r r.�bl�s "�".�. `i� d�!Ryp�4� �"� lit a;.Y.�tgo e^"44 V c j YFk .. � '.�r( ��y^+ '' •p a.. ,"•4 91 �'5,.1�1��'c. � �u,.� ���' 3 , � �,+,�,�`�.s,P�a f sv� qw k a �" a , 7' aM �•!< �:r:: i� '+�G,��'� t .� ,k �;°�^d,'p r'bK S ♦",. ''' arR J,r p.,yF� ,�zi.;hw" �v. +x /'��'^�k. �.r' .. F, °)".', ^,, 'ks: .•'„<:.v R .�a t 'Y,p ,r "�,•.� ����� ��� wr d'a p�+��.�, , , -�• ..r.Flt k�"y $' ,. to -' ,".,.. .. r�.�, a '`^"fd '", .., .:. . ��'��,... 'rk"F'' A �.w,tiWva � iM " �-�, � aW ` '•. 3 y:; 'i 4± �p �"J,rrRd 3�� F ,q ysv bn . ��k�y�, e .7"fF E a �,�� :,� + ,�".. ,T"A�" �h 4�, c,w} ,k' err r .Yh � ,.{�., X'a is hr * ��. " i•. �a�.x �,�. ,w'` " ,,,, '':c ,r'`':>r` '�" ^,�,,.• ads. ;r*"� � ' '� n,;,., ";��„q n., ^„�•, .{;. r ry Rk ax 4n r ^ � �r W•a � Ic d °•� Ye��. .t�,i k +\t y `(fl ��� M'� �4�i►�\R ��4 �fi 1 r t.��" �f i.. � � � � � sal o � 'u (Aft"�•3.. �a �i �'.' 1�.! �r��t 1 r �-' ����°� /e� g `"°; �d;tt '. i� • lit � s �� err � '"%� - M r R i _.. w P� ' „oG a r � p ! LEM u • � r if� b,•g �.�� �t '.1_ fi�4t��. r..a ,?..,. .,e»,:w»'�", .. ,�.. *�.an,�.s �.:.�e:. `. ' qIN i�h� 6�tP•� '��ai,, '�iy'9 4 P9, .: t2''..fi':+�yr ,�' "�'v:.J r",,Y��� "�F "� F �� , q F ,� � : 'A �z�� � ,xd b•9sxe rY...'w.^'.a'a'" tt, v ,e�',. 6 PAA Wf � tlytlS i �q pptltl p,� l r x " '.5r' SYO�F �4� .. v r - ✓. p Igo 6 q M M 1 A °A d '.a- ... r �""^ s'�'�'�� t', � q d� »,� dn. � �'� ° �✓" 1 SN,�gr?'�� rr��y m`° � ^ �ai1". v i "^,x.,w r� q w � �"X 7xi M' Ntl , y' ' City of Renton King Conservation District Watershed Forum and Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 4. Budget Expenses: Budget Item KCD Funds Treemendous Seattle Public Total Utilities(SPU) Salaries and Breakdown Benefits not available Travel/Meals at time of Grant Mileage application Office/Field Supplies $4,000 $4,000 Contracted/ Professional Services $1,000 $5,000 $6,000 Land Acquisition Permits $6,000 $6,000 Total $5,000 $6,000 $5,000 $16,000 The remaining funding needed for the project will be provided by volunteer labor and potentially matching funds from the Seattle Public Utilities to be secured by Treemendous. 5. Describe how the KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. Funding will be acknowledged and reported through utilization of the State BARS system of fiscal reporting. The Kiosks for the site would include information that funding for the project was provided by the King Conservation District. Gregg ?XeyAh, ministrator Date Planninlng/Public Works Department Page 3 H:\DIVTSION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-289.doc\MDD\tb w City of Renton King Conservation District Watershed Forum and Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Project Name: May Creek Basin Action Plan Contact(s): Mike Dotson Implementation Applicant: City of Renton Title: Engineer Specialist III, Surface Water Utility Principal City of Renton,King County Address: 1055 South Grady Way, Partners: Water and Land Resources 5'h Floor,Renton WA, Division,City of Newcastle 98055 Total Project Phone: 425-430-7392 Cost: $805,000 KCD Funding Email: mdotson@ci.renton.wa.us Requested: $45,978 Project Start Fax: 425-430-7241 Date: September 2001 Project End Date: December 2005 Project Funds Requested from King Conservation District: $45,978(The actual amount is dependant upon the actual grant funds available to Renton from the KCD assessment since the last time Renton received its share of the KCD assessment, less grant funds requested on the other 2001 grant applications.) 1. Project Description: The May Creek Basin Action Plan identifies actions to reduce flooding, erosion and improves water quality and fish habitat. The Actions that the King Conservation District funding will be used to supplement City funds to implement include the following: • Recommendation#11: Stabilize the slopes at the most significant erosion sites in the May Creek Canyon related to surface water runoff. A program of erosion-control measures targeted at the most significant surface runoff-induced erosion sites in the lower May Creek basin to prevent erosion and protect water quality and fish habitat. • Recommendation#12: Placement of large woody debris in May Creek Canyon to provide increased stream channel protection to prevent stream bank erosion and improve aquatic habitat. • Recommendation 413: Plant Conifers throughout the Riparian Area in the May Creek Canyon to improve bank stability and reduce erosion and repair stream habitat in the lower 3.9 miles of the stream. The above actions described in this application are a part of the recommendations made by the May Creek Basin Action Plan. The City of Renton,King County and the City of Newcastle Council's have adopted the May Creek Action Plan. Page I H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-359.doc/MDD/tb City of Renton King Conservation District Watershed Forum and Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Project Objectives: • Recommendation #11: To develop and implement a plan to identify and design solutions for the most appropriate sites for stabilization. The objective will be to implement measures to limit the impact of surface-water runoff on these slopes and to reduce existing erosion to improve water quality and protect fish habitat. • Recommendation #12: To provide increased stream channel protection to prevent stream bank erosion,reduce downstream flooding due to sediment deposition and improve aquatic habitat. • Recommendation #13: To improve bank stability, reduce bank erosion and repair stream riparian habitat in the lower 3.9 miles of the stream. The following provides a brief description of specifically how the project meets one criterion and the objectives as set forth in each of the three required categories(bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08: It is stated in the RCW 89.08.01 Preamble section 3: "That to conserve soil resources and control and prevent soil erosion and prevent flood water and sediment damages... it is necessary that land-use practices contributing to soil wastage and soil erosion be discouraged and discontinued, and appropriate soil-conserving land-use practices, and works of improvement for flood prevention of agricultural and nonagricultural phases of the conservation, development,utilization, and disposal of water be adopted and carried out;that among the procedures necessary for widespread adoption, are the carrying on of engineering operations such as the construction of terraces,terrace outlets, check-dams, desilting basins,flood water retarding structures, channel floodways, dikes, ponds, ditches, and the like;the utilization of strip cropping, contour cultivating, and contour furrowing; land irrigation; seeding and planting of waste,sloping,abandoned,or eroded lands to water-conserving and erosion-preventing plants,trees,and grasses; forestation and reforestation; rotation of crops; soil stabilizations with trees, grasses, legumes,and other thick-growing,soil-holding crops, retardation of run-off by increasing absorption of rainfall; and retirement from cultivation of steep,highly erosive areas and areas now badly gullied or otherwise eroded." Description of how this project meets these criteria: This project meets the criteria as set forth in the above text,through the prevention of erosion and deposition of fine sediments into May Creek and reforestation of the riparian area. The project will focus on stabilizing stream banks from erosion,reforestation and reducing erosion from existing stormwater outfalls that are discharging at the top of steep slopes. Page 2 H:\DI VISIONS\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-359.doc/MDD/tb City of Renton King Conservation District Watershed Forum and Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application KCD Strategic Plan Initiative: This proposal meets the strategic plan elements in multiple categories. It specifically addresses the criteria set forth in section 3,a(iii)which states;To carry out preventative and control measures and works of improvement for the conservation of renewable natural resources,within the district including,but not limited to,engineering operations,methods of cultivation,the growing of vegetation,changes in use of lands,and the measures listed in RCW 89.08.010,on any lands within the district upon obtaining the consent of the occupier of such lands and such necessary rights or interests in such lands as may be required; This goal will be carried out by several stream restoration projects designed to improve degraded conditions or provide additional habitat throughout the basin.The May Creek Basin Plan recommends improvements in the May Creek delta; improve fish habitat and stream stability by introducing additional large woody debris in May Creek Canyon;provide slope-stabilization measures to limit erosion and sediment delivery to the creek; and provide small conifer plantings throughout the basin to improve streambank stability,moderate stream temperatures, and become a source for vital organic inputs(e.g. large woody debris)to the stream over the long term. In key locations,projects proposed in the plan would eliminate fish-passage barriers in order to improve upstream access for species using May Creek and its tributaries. Regional Task Force Funding Principles The regional task force funding principles satisfied by this proposal are as follows: RTF Funding Principle 1.b)"habitat restoration which enhances ecologically significant fish runs." Description of how this project meets these criteria: This project lies within the May Creek Basin. There has been an historic run of Chinook in May Creek, and the system does provide habitat elements,which still support coho salmon and sockeye salmon in addition to sea-run cutthroat trout and rainbow trout. Control of erosion and sedimentation and stream bank stabilization in this watershed will improve water quality and therefore enhance the fish runs within the May Creek Basin. 2. Project Activities and Measurable Results: • Recommendation#11: Stabilize the slopes at the most significant erosion sites in the May Creek Canyon related to surface water runoff. Phase I—Identify the most appropriate sites for stabilization. Identification of these sites would be based upon their size, amount of contribution to the May and Honey Creek sediment problem, expected costs, feasibility of stabilization, and the cause of the erosion problem. Phase II—Project Design& Permitting. Design solutions are most likely to involve measures to limit the impact of surface-water runoff on these slopes to prevent aggravation of existing problems. Examples of slope problems and possible solutions include the following: Page 3 H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-359.doc/MDD/tb City of Renton King Conservation District Watershed Forum and Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application (Note: Given the high cost of stabilizing these sites and the significant changes in the canyon's ravine walls due to storms during the winter of 1996-97,prioritization among several identified candidate sites will be necessary before design of these measures is begun. The highest priority sites identified at this time include Honey Creek at River Mile 0.5, and May Creek at River Mile 1.2 and River Mile 1.9.) • Active erosion of canyon walls at River Mile 1.2 of May Creek,where drainage and stormflow from an apartment complex have been concentrated. Chronic erosion and deposition of fine sediments into May Creek is occurring with resultant delivery of sediment to the May Creek LSRA and the mouth of May Creek.In addition, approximately 6 to 8 feet of fill is encroaching upon the edge of the canyon wall, and revegetation of the fill is inhibited by the steepness and looseness of the material. A solution at this site could involve diverting the runoff,which currently flows over the valley wall, into storm drains. If diversion is not possible,directing flows into a new flexible plastic pipe down the valley wall could be attempted.A small energy dissipater and detention pond on the floodplain at the foot of the hill might be necessary as well. The slope itself could require installation of backfilled slope breakers across the face of the eroding slide,with subsequent revegetation. • At River Mile 1.9 of May Creek, an 18-inch corrugated metal pipe has separated at the joint,resulting in two slope failures that deposit sediment into the May Creek LSRA and the delta. Repair work at this site could include measures such as installing plastic pipe down the slope; slope breaks to hold soil on the steep,eroded face; and revegetation. Measures such as these would prevent future erosion and avoid delivery of coarse sediment to the creek from additional slumps,thereby improving water quality and aquatic habitat. Phase III: Construction: Upon the selection and design of the sites construction of appropriate, cost-effective measures will be undertaken. • Recommendation#12: Placement of large woody debris in May Creek Canyon. Phase I: In coordination with King County and the City of Newcastle, develop and identify reaches where large woody debris will be placed, prepare a construction plan, secure the required permits and land rights to allow construction. Phase 11: Construction of the approved plan,which may be done in phases over more than one year. • Recommendation#13: Plant Conifers throughout the Riparian Area in the May Creek Canyon. Phase I: In coordination with King County and the City of Newcastle, develop and identify areas where the planting of conifers would be done in the May Creek Canyon and,prepare a construction (planting)plan, secure the required permits and land rights to allow construction. Page 4 H:\DIVISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-359.doc/MDD/tb City of Renton King Conservation District Watershed Forum and Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Phase II: Construction of the approved plan,which may be done in phases over more than one year. The planting may be done as part of volunteer planting projects or by hired contractors. 1. Budget Expenses: Budget Item KCD Funds King County City of City of Total Renton INewcastle Salaries and Amounts of each budget item to be Benefits proportioned according to Interlocal Travel/Meals Agreement(See attached Exh. B) Mileage Office/Field Supplies Contracted/ Professional Services $45,978 $45,978 Land Acquisition Permits $759,022 $759,022 Total $45,978 $160,000 1 $514,022 1$85,000 $805,000 Future King Conservation District Grant funds may be requested to assist in funding the implementation of the May Creek Basin Action Plan's recommendations. 2. Describe how the KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. Funding will be acknowledged,reported and tracked through the utilization of the Budget Accounting and Reporting System of the State or Washington("BARS"). It will be acknowledged that tax payer funds provided through the King Conservation District is being used for the implementation of these above described recommendations in any newspaper articles, website or other information released during their implementation. 0�09" / Z 1,,Pdal Gregg Zi ,Administrator Date Planning/B Ilding/Public Works Department Page 5 H:\Dl VISION.S\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-359.doc/MDD/tb MAY CREEK BASIN PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Exhibit B INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT 1 This agreement is entered into by and between King County,Washington, 2 hereinafter known as"King County", the City of Renton,hereinafter known as "Renton", 3 and the City of Newcastle, hereinafter known as "Newcastle",collectively referred to as 4 "the Parties",to cooperatively undertake actions to protect and restore the May Creek 5 Basin. These actions are outlined in the 1998 May Creek Basin Action Plan which sets 6 forth policies, programs,regulations, and actions to protect surface waters and natural 7 resources and to address flooding in the May Creek Basin, a sub-basin of the Lake 8 Washington Watershed in central King County. 9 10 WHEREAS, the Parties share jurisdiction within the May Creek Basin ("the 11 Basin") and recognize that the Basin's extensive natural resource system of streams, 12 lakes, and wetlands is worthy of restoration and protection to promote water quality, fish 13 habitat,recreation, and flood storage values in the Basin; and 14 WHEREAS, the Parties recognize the importance of protecting and restoring the 15 water resources and habitat quality of Lake Washington by maintaining the water quality 16 of surface waters entering Lake Washington from the May Creek Basin; and 17 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to address existing drainage, flooding, and erosion 18 and sedimentation problems in the May Creek Basin; and 19 WHEREAS, existing and proposed development in the Basin threatens the 20 stability and function of the Basin's natural resource system and is likely to exacerbate 21 flooding, erosion, sedimentation and water quality problems, and to adversely impact the 22 quality of life and habitat in the Basin; and 23 WHEREAS, in 1994, King County and Renton entered into the May Creek Basin 24 Plan Development Interlocal Agreement to develop a comprehensive plan to address 25 surface water concerns in the watershed; and 26 WHEREAS, the City of Newcastle became an incorporated city in 1995 and has 27 shared jurisdiction in the May Creek Basin with Renton and King County since that time; 28 and 29 WHEREAS,The Parties, in consultation with the May Creek Citizens Advisory 30 Committee (CAC), have undertaken basin-wide planning as the most effective means to 31 address surface-water related problems in the Basin and to protect the ecological health 32 and public benefits of the Basin over the long term; and 33 WHEREAS, the Parties have cooperated to complete the May Creek Basin Action 34 Plan ("the Plan"), which outlines recommended programs,policies and actions to protect 35 the Basin's natural resources and water quality and to address flooding; and 36 WHEREAS,The Parties wish to work cooperatively to implement Plan 37 recommendations; and 38 WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 39.34,the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the Parties 39 are each authorized to enter into an agreement for cooperative action, 40 41 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows: - 1 06/14/01 1 I. Purpose of the Agreement 2 A. This agreement describes the actions to be undertaken and funded by the Parties 3 for the protection and enhancement of the May Creek Basin,based on the 4 recommendations of the 1998 May Creek Basin Action Plan. Recommendations 5 presented in the Plan are separated into two categories: 6 1. Primary recommendations are those of highest priority for Basin protection 7 and enhancement and are intended to be implemented, through this agreement, 8 within the first five years following adoption of the Plan. 9 2. Secondary recommendations address issues of secondary priority and will 10 likely involve implementation timelines beyond the initial five year Plan 11 implementation period. Though the Basin Plan identifies probable 12 jurisdictional responsibilities for secondary recommendations, their 13 implementation is beyond the scope of this agreement. 14 Plan recommendations and actions by the Parties to protect and enhance the Basin 15 are outlined in agreement Exhibit One, attached to this agreement and 16 incorporated herein and made a part hereof, and include actions to be conducted 17 cooperatively and individually. Cooperative actions may require additional action 18 of the Councils of each jurisdiction in order to be implemented. 19 This agreement establishes the May Creek Basin Committee, composed of 20 representatives of each of the Parties,to provide overall management and review 21 of Plan implementation activities. 22 23 II. Basin Characteristics 24 The May Creek Basin covers approximately 14 square miles in central King 25 County and drains to the southeast shore of Lake Washington. The western one- 26 third of the Basin,much of it a natural floodplain,is characterized by intensive 27 residential development and significantly reduced forest cover. The eastern two- 28 thirds of the Basin is lightly developed,but land use changes have also resulted in 29 the reduction of forest cover and an increase in impervious ground surface. 30 Development in the region has resulted in the filling of wetlands, increased 31 erosion and sedimentation, and increased threats to ecological and public health. 32 33 Land use changes in the Basin have caused increased stormwater runoff 34 throughout the Basin. Flood flows have also increased,resulting in additional 35 erosion of hillsides above May Valley,flooding and sediment deposition in the 36 valley, erosion in the canyon downstream of the valley and flooding and 37 deposition near the mouth of May Creek. Higher storm flows and lowered 38 floodwater storage capacity in the Basin also decrease dry weather in-stream 39 flows and raise water temperatures, both of which are detrimental to resident and 40 migratory fish. 41 42 Basin land use changes have also affected water quality in MayCreek and its 43 tributaries. Pollution from industrial, agricultural, and residential sources has 2 I reduced the habitat value of local streams and has placed underground drinking 2 water sources,critical to the residents of the Basin and the City of Renton, at risk. 3 4 Although surface water problems exist in the Basin,it retains high quality natural 5 resources and attributes worthy of protection and enhancement. Most of the 6 mainstem of lower May Creek benefits from a moderately well forested riparian 7 area that is protected as park land. May Creek provides habitat to numerous fish 8 and wildlife in both its lower and upland portions. Coho, chinook, and sockeye 9 salmon, as well as steelhead and cutthroat trout are all supported by the May 10 Creek system. In addition to stream habitat, there is an extensive array of 11 wetlands, a critically valuable resource, within the Basin. King County Wetland 12 #11 on tributary 0289 is considered to be a Regionally Significant Resource Area 13 (RSRA), and several of the Basin's wetlands meet the definition for Locally 14 Significant Resource Areas (LSRA). Significant Resource Areas are described in 15 the Plan, and are areas of special ecological significance within the entire 16 watershed. 17 18 III. Basin Plan Goals and Activities to Achieve Goals 19 A. Goals 20 The primary goals of the May Creek Basin Action Plan are to: 21 1. Reduce the threat of flooding of homes where living areas have been 22 adversely affected; 23 2. Make infrastructure improvements that will facilitate stormflow conveyance, 24 stabilize stream banks, and reduce erosion; 25 3. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water quality in the Basin; 26 4. Take reasonable steps to prevent existing habitat degradation, water quality, 27 flooding, and sedimentation and erosion problems from worsening in the 28 future. 29 30 B. Actions to Achieve Goals 31 The May Creek Basin Action Plan identifies eighteen high priority 32 recommendations to address surface water related problems and to protect and 33 enhance resources in the Basin.The specific recommendations are outlined on 34 Exhibit One, and are categorized as follows: 35 1. Regulatory measures for new development to appropriately control surface 36 water runoff and erosion and to protect water quality; 37 2. Education and stewardship activities to involve and educate the public in 38 protecting Basin resources; 39 3. Monitoring activities to gauge the health of Basin resources and the 40 effectiveness of management and Plan implementation activities over time; 41 4. Flood protection and habitat improvement/enhancement measures, including 42 construction projects, vegetation planting, and landowner incentive and 43 assistance programs. 3 1 2 IV. Project Management 3 A. Overall project management and direction for Basin Plan implementation 4 activities will be performed by the May Creek Basin Committee, to be composed 5 of the Newcastle Public Works Diiector, the Renton Surface Water Utility 6 Engineering Supervisor, and the Basin Steward representing the May Creek 7 watershed for King County, or other representatives from each jurisdiction as 8 designated by each Party. Additional staff persons representing any of the Parties 9 are welcome to attend Basin Committee meetings to support Committee activities. 10 B. The Basin Committee will meet as needed,but at least semi-annually. I 1 C. Basin Committee responsibilities are as follows: 12 1. pre-implementation review and approval of project designs for joint projects; 13 2. review and approval of major design and funding modifications for 14 implementation actions, including amendments to project scopes of work for 15 joint projects; 16 3. review and approval of prioritization and scheduling of joint implementation 17 actions; and 18 4. discuss outcomes of completed and on-going implementation actions, 19 including the results of Basin monitoring activities. 20 D. The King County representative shall serve as facilitator for Basin Committee 21 meetings and will provide meeting-related support including arranging meeting 22 schedules,keeping and distributing meeting minutes, and providing agendas. 23 E. It is the intent of the Parties to continue to involve the public in protecting the 24 Basin's resources and implementing the Plan. The Basin Committee shall 25 consider any input on Basin issues provided by the CAC or other interested 26 citizens. 27 F. The Basin Committee will reach its decisions by consensus. Issues that cannot be 28 resolved by the Basin Committee will be referred as needed to the King County 29 Water and Land Resources Division Manager or his/her designee, the Renton 30 Department of Planning, Building, and Public Works Department Administrator 31 or his/her designee, and the Newcastle City Manager,or his/her designee. 32 33 V. Responsibilities 34 The Parties will undertake Plan implementation activities outlined on Exhibit 35 One, including shared and individual actions. Implementation funding for each 36 plan recommendation whether programmatic or capital project construction, is 37 dependent upon budget appropriation actions to be taken by each participating 38 jurisdiction's legislative (Council)body. Implementation of all capital 39 improvement projects is contingent upon receipt of any required permits before 40 construction. 4 I A. Shared Responsibilities 2 1. Each Party shall provide a representative to serve on the Basin Committee and 3 shall provide any needed support to the Basin Committee member. 4 2. Plan Recommendation 1: Establish and Enforce Requirements for Runoff 5 Retention/Detention, Forest Retention, and Water Quality Facilities for Site 6 Development. Each Party shall work to implement appropriate development 7 standards, as detailed in the Plan,including: 8 (a) Retention/detention standards for all new development; 9 (b) Water Quality Standards at least equivalent to the minimum requirements 10 of either the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual, or other 11 substantially equivalent standards that may be required for compliance 12 with the Endangered Species Act. 13 Establishing new retention/detention standards is an action that may require 14 the amendment of existing code by the Parties' legislative bodies. 15 3. Plan Recommendation 3: Establish a Monitoring Program to Determine the 16 Effectiveness of Implemented Plan Actions. The Parties will provide for a 17 basinwide monitoring program as described in the Plan and in Agreement 18 section V.13.3., and in a scope of work and cost share arrangement to be 19 attached to this agreement as Exhibit Two and included herein. The Basin 20 Committee will review the monitoring program annually, and may revise the 21 scope of work and/or cost share arrangement. 22 4. Plan Recommendation 9: Work Cooperatively to Protect the City of Renton 23 Drinking Water Supply. King County and Newcastle will work with Renton 24 to implement actions to protect water quality in aquifer recharge areas within 25 their jurisdictions. 26 5. Plan Recommendations 12, and 13: Place Large Woody Debris in May Creek 27 in May Creek Canyon; and Plant Conifers Throughout the Riparian Area in 28 May Creek Canyon. The Parties will implement these recommendations as 29 cooperatively conducted capital projects. 30 6. Recommendation 17: Require Full Mitigation for Future In.creases in Zoning 31 Density in Areas Draining to May Valley. Each Party will implement this 32 recommendation in order to minimize stormwater runoff flows from new 33 development. Each Party will notify the other Parties whenever considering a 34 zoning change in an area draining to May Creek. Changing the zoning of a 35 parcel only requires action by the Parties' respective legislative bodies. 36 B. King County Responsibilities 37 1. Plan Recommendation 1:Establish and Enforce Requirements for Runoff 38 Retention/Detention, Forest Retention, and Water Quality Facilities for Site 39 Development. King County will implement Forest Retention Standards, as 40 described in the Plan, for development projects in all rurally zoned lands. 5 1 2. Recommendation 2: Develop Basin Stewardship, Public Involvement, and 2 Education Opportunities for Residents and Stakeholders Through the 3 Creation of a May Creek Basin Steward. Subject to its annual budget 4 process, King County will provide staff to serve as the Basin Steward for the 5 May Creek Basin area. The Steward will provide services as specifically 6 requested by Renton and Newcastle in their incorporated areas and as staff 7 availability allows; costs will be charged to the Cities only for services 8 provided. 9 3. Plan Recommendation 3:Establish a Monitoring Program to Determine the 10 Effectiveness of Implemented Plan Actions. King County will act as lead for 11 implementing the monitoring program. A scope of work and cost share 12 arrangement for a basinwide monitoring program will be approved by the 13 Basin Committee for each year of plan implementation. This scope of work 14 and cost share arrangement between the Parties will be attached to this 15 Agreement as Exhibit Two and included herein. 16 4. Recommendation 10: Facilitate Permitting for May Creek Delta Dredging. 17 King County will work cooperatively with Renton in providing technical 18 assistance for permitting activities as needed and as resources allow. 19 5. Plan Recommendation 14: Improve Lake Boren Water Quality. Newcastle 20 will serve as lead implementing agency. King County will work 21 cooperatively with the City to provide technical assistance for Lake Boren 22 management activities as needed and as resources allow. 23 6. Recommendation 18: Reduce the Potential for Negative Water Quality 24 Impacts Originating at the Basin's Quarry Sites. King County will 25 coordinate implementation of this recommendation in conjunction with other 26 King County and State agencies. 27 7. Recommendation 11: Stabilize the Slopes at the Most Significant Erosion Sites 28 in May Creek Canyon Related to Surface Water Runoff Discharges 29 King County will coordinate with Renton in assisting the development and 30 implementation of Recommendation 11. King County will provide technical 31 support,conceptual and/or final design review as requested by the City of 32 Renton and as staff availability allows. 33 8. King County will implement the following Plan recommendations,including 34 any necessary conceptual analysis,project design,project permitting,and 35 construction: 36 (a) Plan Recommendation 4: Provide Cost-sharing and Technical 37 Assistance for Flood Protection in May Valley; 38 (b) Plan Recommendation S: Remove Flow Obstructions from the Channel of 39 May Creek in May Valley; 40 (c) Recommendation 6:Restore Flows Diverted from Tributary 0294 back 41 into Tibbetts Creek; 42 (d) Recommendation 7: Enlarge the Culvert under S.E. May Valley Road at 43 the E. Fork of May Creek; 6 I (e) Recommendation 8: Protect Habitat at the Confluence of May Creek and 2 Its Tributary Streams within King County. 3 C. Renton Responsibilities 4 1. Plan Recommendation 9: Work Cooperatively to Protect the City of Renton 5 Drinking Water Supply. Renton will have primary responsibility for 6 establishing a wellhead protection program and other drinking water supply 7 protection activities. 8 2. Plan Recommendation 10. Facilitate Permitting for May Creek Delta 9 Dredging. Renton will expedite processing of any city-required permits 10 related to this activity, and will provide technical assistance to the property 11 owner as needed and as resources allow. 12 3. Plan Recommendation 11:Stabilize the Slopes at the Most Significant Erosion 13 Sites in May Creek Canyon Related to Surface Water Runoff Discharges. 14 Renton will act as lead agency for implementing projects, within Renton, 15 associated with Recommendation 11. Renton will be responsible for any 16 planning,permitting, design and construction of any projects, within Renton, 17 associated with the implementation of Recommendation 11. Renton will 18 coordinate with King County in the implementation of this shared project. 19 D. Newcastle Responsibilities 20 1. Newcastle will implement the following Plan recommendations, including any 21 necessary conceptual analysis, project design, project permitting, and 22 construction: 23 (a) Plan Recommendation 14: Improve Lake Boren Water Quality, 24 (b) Plan Recommendation 1 S: Improve Boren Creek Fish Passage at S.E. 25 8Vh Place; 26 (c) Plan Recommendation 16. Improve the Newcastle Railroad Embankment 27 Outlet 28 29 VI. Costs 30 A. May Creek Basin Committee: 31 Each Party will fund its own staff's participation in the Basin Committee, as 32 described in agreement section V.A.1. 33 B. Shared Costs: 34 1. King County and Renton will be responsible for their cost shares incurred 35 through the implementation of Plan Recommendations 10 and 11. Cost shares 36 are listed in agreement Exhibit One. Provision of each jurisdiction's cost share 37 contribution for implementation of Recommendation 11 may be made through 38 "in-kind" staff services, as agreed to by Renton and King County. 39 2. King County, Newcastle, and Renton will be responsible for their individual 40 cost shares through the implementation of Plan Recommendations 12 and 13. 41 Cost shares are listed in agreement Exhibit One. 7 1 3. Should implementation considerations lead to changes to the scope of work 2 for any shared project, the implementing jurisdictions shall review and 3 approve any changes including any changes to project cost or timeline. Each 4 jurisdiction's implementation funding is subject to the budget appropriations 5 process of each jurisdiction's legislative (Council)body. Changes to the scope 6 of work that alter the cost shares shown in Exhibit One will be attached to this 7 agreement and incorporated as amendments hereto. 8 C. Independent Program Costs: 9 1. Implementation costs for Plan Recommendations 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 18 will be 10 the responsibility of King County and are subject to King County's annual 11 budget process. 12, 2. Implementation costs for Plan Recommendations 14, 15 and 16 will be the 13 responsibility of Newcastle and are subject to the City's annual budget 14 process. 15 D. Plan Recommendations 1, 9, and 17 are recommendations for implementation of 16 regulatory standards to protect water quality in the May Creek Basin which have 17 no direct program cost. 18 E. Cost shares for implementing a May Creek Basin monitoring program under Plan 19 Recommendation 3: A scope of work including jurisdictional cost-shares for 20 implementing a May Creek Basin monitoring program according to Plan 21 Recommendation 3 will be established by mutual agreement of the Parties and 22 attached to this agreement as Exhibit Two. The maximum cost-shares for 23 monitoring are shown in Exhibit One under Recommendation 3. The Basin 24 Committee will review the monitoring program annually, and may revise the 25 scope of work and/or cost share arrangement. However, any proposed revisions 26 to the monitoring program which increase the cost shares to any party beyond the 27 maximum cost shares shown in Exhibit One, will only be implemented through a 28 separate written amendment to this agreement per Agreement section VIH.D_ 29 30 VH. Billing and Payment 31 A. For Basin Steward activities requested by Newcastle or Renton under Plan 32 Recommendation 2,King County shall bill the Party requesting Basin Steward 33 services quarterly on itemized invoices for the cost of the requested Basin 34 Steward activities. The Parties shall review and approve the invoices and forward 35 payment to King County within 60 days of receipt of the invoice. 36 B. King County shall bill the Parties according to cost share agreements as shown in 37 agreement Exhibit One related to implementation of Plan Recommendations 3, 38 12, and 13. 39 40 C. The City of Renton shall bill King County for costs related to the implementation 41 of Recommendation 11. King County will provide documentation for in-kind 42 staff services provided if replacing cash payment for King County's cost share. 43 8 I VIII. Duration,Termination,and Amendment 2 The Parties agree to the following: 3 A. This agreement is effective upon signature by the Parties and will remain in effect 4 until December 31, 2005, or until all capital improvement project primary 5 recommendations have been completed,whichever is later. 6 B. Participation in this agreement may be terminated by any individual Party with 7 120 days written notice.This agreement may be terminated by written agreement 8 of all the Parties. 9 C. Should any Party choose to terminate its participation in this agreement, said 10 Party will be responsible for all previously agreed upon shared costs for project(s) 11 which have been initiated but which are not complete upon termination. 12 D. This agreement may be amended, altered, clarified, or extended only by the 13 written agreement of the Parties hereto. 14 E. This agreement is not assignable by any Party to this agreement, either in whole 15 or in part. 16 F. This agreement is the complete expression of the terms hereto, and any oral or 17 written representations or understandings not incorporated herein are excluded. 18 The Parties recognize that time is of the essence in the performance of the 19 provisions of this agreement. Waiver of any default shall not be deemed to be 20 waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of this 21 agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach 22 and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of the agreement 23 unless stated to be such through written approval by the Parties which shall be 24 attached to the original agreement. 25 26 IX. Counterparts 27 This agreement may be executed in counterparts. 9 I X. Indemnification and Hold Harmless 2 The Parties agree to the following: 3 Each Party shall protect, defend,indemnify, and save harmless the other Parties, 4 their officers, officials,employees, and agents,while acting within the scope of 5 their employment as such, from any and all costs,claims,judgments, and/or 6 awards of damages, arising out of or in any way resulting from each Party's own 7 negligent acts or omissions. Each Party agrees that its obligations under this 8 subparagraph extend to any claim, demand, and/or cause of action brought by,or 9 on behalf of, any of its employees or agents. For this purpose,each Party,by 10 mutual negotiation,hereby waives,with respect to the other Parties only, any I 1 immunity that would otherwise be available against such claims under the 12 Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW. In the event that a Party incurs 13 any judgment, award, and/or cost arising therefrom,including attorneys' fees, to 14 enforce the provisions of this Article, all such fees, expenses, and costs shall be 15 recoverable from the responsible Party to the extent of that Party's culpability. 16 17 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on 18 the_ day of ,S !Kr , 2001. 19 20 21 Approved as to Form: King County: 22 23 24 By: _ By: 25 26 27 Title-- Title: 28 29 30 31 Approved as to Form: City of Newcastle: 32 33 34 By: By: 35 36 37 Title: Title: 38 39 40 Approved as to Form: City of Renton: 41 42 43 By: By: 44 45 46 Title: Title: 47 10 I X: Indemnification and Hold Harmless 2 The Parties agree to the following: 3 Each Party shall protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless the other Parties, 4 their officers, officials, employees, and agents,while acting within the scope of 5 their employment as such, from any and all costs, claims,judgments, and/or 6 awards of damages, arising out of or in any way resulting from each Party's own 7 negligent acts or omissions. Each Party agrees that its obligations under this 8 subparagraph extend to any claim,demand, and/or cause of action brought by, or 9 on behalf of, any of its employees or agents. For this purpose, each Party,by 10 mutual negotiation,hereby waives,with respect to the other Parties only, any I immunity that would otherwise be available against such claims under the 12 Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW. In the event that a Party incurs 13 any judgment, award, and/or cost arising therefrom, including attorneys'fees, to 14 enforce the provisions of this Article, all such fees, expenses, and costs shall be 15 recoverable from the responsible Party to the extent of that Parry's culpability. 16 17 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on . 18 the 19 -70\ day of 20 21 22 Approved as to Form: King County: 23 24 25 By- By: 26 27 28 Title: _ Title: _ 29 30 31 32 Approved as to Form: City of Newcastle: 33 34 tK-Co 35 By:3637C�A�,c 38 Title: Suv _ Title: _ 39 40 41 Approved as to Form: City of Renton: 42 43 44 - By: By: 45 46 47 Title: _ Title: _ 48 10 I X. Indemnification and Hold Harmless 2 The Parties agree to the following: 3 Each Party shall protect, defend,indemnify, and save harmless the other Parties, 4 their officers,officials, employees, and agents,while acting within the scope of 5 their employment as such, from any and all costs, claims,judgments, and/or 6 awards of damages, arising out of or in any way resulting from each Party's own 7 negligent acts or omissions. Each Party agrees that its obligations under this 8 subparagraph extend to any claim, demand, and/or cause of action brought by, or 9 on behalf of, any of its employees or agents. For this purpose, each Party,by 10 mutual negotiation,hereby waives,with respect to the other Parties only, any 11 immunity that would otherwise be available against such claims under the 12 Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW. In the event that a Party incurs 13 any judgment, award, and/or cost arising therefrom,including attorneys' fees,to 14 enforce the provisions of"this Article, all such fees, expenses, and costs shall be 15 recoverable from the responsible Party to the extent of that Party's culpability. 16 17 IN WITNEySS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on 18 the day of J 116�- , 2001. 19 20 21 Approved as to Form: King County: 22 23 24 By: By: 25 26 27 Title: Title: 28 29 30 31 Approved as to Form: City of Newcastle: 32 33 34 By: By: 35 36 37 Title: Title: 38 39 40 Approved a orm: City of Renton: 41 42 43 By: By: 44 L41rSse Tanner 45 46 Title: Renton City Attorney Title: Mayor 47 1 ATTEST o .r✓ Marilyn J. tersen, City Clerk 10 Exhibit One May Creek Basin Action Plan Implementation Actions Implementing Total King County Newcastle Renton Cost Basinwide Recommendations Agency Estimated Cost Share Cost Share Share Project Cost 1. Establish and Enforce Requirements for Runoff King Co. WLRD, Not Retention/Detention,Forest Retention,and Water Renton, Newcastle Applicable Quality Facilities for Site Development. The Parties will work to: ♦ Establish appropriate retention/detention standards for all new development in the Basin; ♦ Enforce appropriate forest retention standards; and ♦ Enact basin-wide water quality standards that are at least equivalent to the minimum requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 2 Develop Basin Stewardship,Public Involvement,and King Co. WLRD, Up to Up to Costs to be Costs to be Education Opportunities for Residents and Renton, Newcastle $300,000 $300,000 paid by paid by Stakeholders Through the Creation of a May Creek (Up to (Will fund Newcastle as Renton as city Basin Steward. $60,000 Steward city requests requests The Basin Steward shall: annually for 5- annually, services. services. ♦ work cooperatively with residents and businesses in years.) subject to May Valley and King County permitting and technical budget staff to implement Plan Recommendations; authority.) ♦ coordinate volunteer and educational activities; and ♦ act as point of contact for basin needs and issues for residents, businesses,and King County,Newcastle, Renton, and other key governments in the Basin. 3 Establish a Monitoring Program Focused on King Co. WLRD, Up to Up to Up to$55,000 Up to$55,000 Determining the Effectiveness of Implemented Plan Renton, Newcastle $330,000 $220,000 (Up to (Up to Actions. (Up to (Up to 44,000 $11,000per $11,000 per Develop a monitoring program, including scientific $66,000 per per year for 5- year for 5- year for 5- monitoring of physical, chemical,and biological year for 5- years to be years to be years to be factors of Basin resources to determine Basin health, years to be determined determined determined impacts of activities, and the effectiveness of Plan determined annually.) annually.) annually.) recommendations as they are implemented. annually.) 1 Exhibit One May Creek Basin Action Plan Implementation Actions Implementing Total King County Newcastle Renton Cost May Valley Subarea Agency Estimated Cost Share Cost Share Share Project Cost 4 Provide Cost-sharing and Technical Assistance for King Co. DNR $600,000+ $600,000 $0 $0 Flood Protection in May Valley. Implement flood-proofing measures in May Valley by conducting projects to protect homes,businesses. q Projects to include the following: ♦ Working with landowner to pursue individual flood reduction actions; and ♦ Buyout of frequently flooded homes in May Valley wetland where no other remedies can be found; and ♦ Conducting habitat improvement projects in the floodplain to reduce flooding on adjacent property; and ♦ Exploring opportunities to obtain additional state and federal funding for flood buyout projects. 5 Remove Flow Obstructions from the Channel of King Co. WLRD, Up to Up to $0 $0 May Creek in May Valley. $350,000 $350,000 Working with landowners and permitting agencies, King County will conduct pilot program to remove channel blockages in May Valley. The goal of this recommendation is to remove typical blockages including beaver dams, sediment deposits, and channel blocking vegetation. The pilot program will conduct clearing of the low-flow channel to improve the drawdown of flood waters in May Valley. 6 Restore Flows Diverted from Tributary 0294 back King Co. WLRD Undetermined Undetermined $0 $0 into Tibbetts Creek basin. King County will work with City of Issaquah and the owner of the former Sunset Quarry to pursue relocation of flows from a 200-acre catchment now draining to May Creek which appears to have historically been tributary to Tibbetts Creek,but which has been redirected to May Creek. 2 Exhibit One May Creek Basin Action Plan Implementation Actions Implementing Total King County Newcastle Renton Cost May Valley Subarea Agency Estimated Cost Share Cost Share Share Project Cost 7 Enlarge the Culvert at SE May Valley Road at E. King Co. DOT $50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 Fork May Creek. The new and larger culvert will improve conveyance and fish passage. 8 Protect Habitat at the Confluence of May Creek and King Co. WLRD $25,000+ $25,000+ $0 $0 Its Tributary Streams. (likely to cost (likely to cost Protect high quality spawning areas, located at the 50,000-80,000 50,000-80,000 mouths of May Creek tributary streams, from siltation for project of for project of through the placement of large woody debris or rock the complexity the complexity stabilization structures upstream of these areas. This recommended recommended recommendation would begin with a pilot project at one in plan) in plan) site, which could serve as a model for similar projects in the rest of the Basin. Implementing Total King County Newcastle Renton Cost Agency Estimated Cost Share Cost Share Share Lower Basin Subarea Project cost \ 9 Work cooperatively to protect the City of Renton Renton as lead agency, Within Within Within Within drinking water supply. in cooperation with budgeted staff budgeted staff budgeted staff budgeted staff Establish a Wellhead Protection Program, identify King Co. WLRD and time. time. time. time. pollutant sources, and implement, with the cooperation Newcastle. of adjacent jurisdictions and the private sector, a program to protect the groundwater system. 10 Facilitate Permitting for May Creek Delta Renton as lead agency, Within Within $0 Within Dredging. in cooperation with budgeted staff budgeted staff budgeted staff Assist the property owner at the May Creek Delta in King Co. WLRD. time. time. time. Lake Washington obtain permits needed for future dredging of sediment from the delta. 11 Stabilize the Slopes at the Most Significant Erosion King Co. WLRD, $550,000 $75,000 $0 $475,000 Sites in May Creek Canyon Related to Surface Renton Runoff Discharges. Implement a program of improved surface water conveyance and landslide control measures at sites along May and Honey Creeks to reduce slope failure,erosion,and sedimentation. 3 Exhibit One May Creek Basin Action Plan Implementation Actions Implementing Total King County Newcastle Renton Cost Agency Estimated Cost Share Cost Share Share Lower Basin Subarea Project Cost 12 Place Large Woody Debris in May Creek in May King Co. WLRD, $225,000(an $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 Creek Canyon. Renton,Newcastle additional Large woody debris will provide increased stream grant of channel protection and aquatic habitat and will reduce $50,000 has sediment delivery to the May Creek delta. also been approved by the Lake Washington Watershed Forum and may expand scope of work) 13 Plant Conifers Throughout the Riparian Area in King Co. WLRD, Up to Up to Up to Up to May Creek Canyon. Renton,Newcastle $30,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Improve bank stability and protect and repair stream- side and in-stream habitat along lower portions of the creek,below river mile 3.9 by: ♦ Planting conifers throughout the riparian area ♦ Thinning existing deciduous understory vegetation in places to promote growth of new plantings. 14 Improve Lake Boren Water Quality Newcastle, (in $30,000 $0 $30,000 $0 Expand the citizen-based water quality monitoring and conjunction with Coal stewardship program to collect water quality data for Creek Utility District), the lake, improve public education regarding water King Co. WLRD quality, and begin small-scale improvement actions. 15 Improve Boren Creek Fish Passage at SE 89thPlace. Newcastle Up to $0 Up to $0 Improve fish access to upstream areas of Boren Creek $150,000 $150,000 by replacing existing culvert with a bridge or open bottom culvert. 4 Exhibit One May Creek Basin Action Plan Implementation Actions Implementing Total King County Newcastle Renton Cost Agency Estimated Cost Share Cost Share Share Lower Basin Subarea Project Cost 16 Improve the Newcastle Railroad Embankment Newcastle $70,000+ $0 $70,000+ $0 Outlet. maintenance maintenance The embankment currently collects water and poses a costs costs hazard should the embankment fail. Replace the outlet structure, monitor the pond level and establish an emergency plan in case of failure. East Renton Plateau and Implementing Total King County Newcastle Renton Cost Agency Estimated Cost Share Cost Share Share Highlands Subareas Project Cost 17 Require Full Mitigation for Future Increases in King Co., Newcastle, Not applicable - - Zoning Density in Areas Draining to May Valley. and Renton For areas of the basin draining to May Valley, zoning densities should not be increased,unless a qualified hydrologic analysis demonstrates that their impacts on surface water conditions can be fully mitigated. Density bonuses provided under development incentive programs should not be approved for these areas. 18 Reduce the Potential for Negative Water Quality King Co. WLRD and Included in Included in Not applicable Not Impacts Originating at the Basin's Quarry Sites. DDES, in cooperation proposed proposed applicable Ensure that the Basin's closed quarry sites are with state agencies Basin Steward Basin Steward reclaimed in a technically sound manner that protects activities. activities, resource quality and that any future quarrying activity is undertaken in compliance with existing water quality standards. Develop a strategy to provide improved enforcement,technical assistance, and/or incentives to quarry operators to improve operating practices and reclamation techniques to minimize impacts on surface water quantity and quality. Total estimated cost-shares for all plan recommendations $1710.000 $1,70 $390.000 $615,00n Abbreviations: King Co,DDES -*King County Department of Development and Environmental Services WLRD wKing County Water and Land Resources King Co,DNR a King County Department of Natural Resources Parks -*King County Department of Parks and Recreation King Co,DOT -*King County Department of Transportation 5 Exhibit Two 2001 May Creek Monitoring Plan Scope of Work and Cost-share Arrangement ' MONITORING PLAN The overall goals of the May Creek Monitoring Plan are:to evaluate the effectiveness of the May Creek Basin Action Plan in protecting human safety,property,and aquatic habitat;to assess the overall health of the watershed,and;to provide information to aid in future management issues. Monitoring activities will focus on evaluating the May Creek Action Plan's key priority projects and management strategies and will be designed to answer the following questions that are directly related to the goals of the May Creek Action Plan: 1. Is water quality staying the same,improving or declining? 2. Are existing problems(e.g.,high flows,erosion and sedimentation)getting better or getting worse? 3. Are streambanks stabilized and erosion/sedimentation reduced? 4. What are the current conditions of fish and wildlife habitat,and are they staying the same,improving or declining? Monitoring data and analysis will determine if recommended strategies have been implemented and have achieved basin plan goals, and changes,if any,will be recommended.Monitoring activities will be prioritized and evaluated by the May Creek Basin Committee with input from the WRIA forum and citizens within the watershed. Monitoring activities will be undertaken in order of priority,as time and funding allows. These activities may be performed by King County,or may be performed by other agencies involved in the Basin,or by interagency partnerships. CURRENT ACTIVITIES Four categories of monitoring activities are currently carried out in the May Creek Basin and listed in Table 1. The section below the table describes the activities in more detail. Table 1. May Creek monitoring activities and sites. I NEW, _ T � 1.Hydrology Yes 2,3 Two stream gauges now located at the mouth of May Creek and Coal Creek Parkway continued. 2.Water Quality Yes 1,2,3,4 One current ambient water quality monitoring site(#0440)is located at the mouth of May Creek. 3.Small Lakes Yes 1,2,3,4 Lake Boren and Lake Kathleen are part of Monitoring the King County Volunteer Lake Program. Further assistance available to Newcastle at their request. 4. Fish Surveys Yes 4 Volunteer salmon-program watching provides data on spawning salmon.Data are collected by volunteers on May Creek. Program is separately funded. 1 Exhibit Two 1. HYDROLOGY Purpose Stream gauges are commonly used to gauge the flow in streams in areas where development will or has occurred. Stream gauges are also located downstream of hydrologic projects such as retention/detention facilities in order to determine if the facility is operating as designed. Information from both stream and rain gauges is used to calibrate hydrologic models such as to: 1)estimate future flows in watersheds based on various development scenarios;2)estimate needed capacity for capital projects and retention/detention facilities;and,3)when combined with water quality data,estimate pollutant loadings to a waterbody. In addition,gauges are used to accumulate flow data to improve computation of flood magnitude return intervals. Examples of specific management questions answered using information from hydrological monitoring include: • What are the magnitudes of flood and base flows in particular streams or tributaries? Are flood magnitudes or frequency increasing? Is base flow decreasing? • Is increased flooding or decreased base flow correlated to management activities in the basin or tributaries? • What are existing flooding thresholds in a particular area? • Are Capital Improvement Projects(CIPs)and small habitat restoration projects having cumulative beneficial impact on reducing erosion and flooding? King County currently maintains a network of approximately 140 monitoring gauges throughout King County. Two types of gauges are used to collect information. One type is a flow gauge,which is used to measure and record stream stage to indicate stream flow through the stage-discharge relationship. The second type is a rain gauge,which is used to measure and record precipitation. Two flow gauges and two rain gauges are currently located in the May Creek Basin. • 37A:May Creek flow gauge at Mouth since Nov 1988 • 37B:May Creek flow gauge at Coal Creek Parkway since March 1988 • 37U:Lower May Creek Rain Gauge since Oct 1989 • 37V:Upper May Creek Rain Gauge since Oct 1988 2. WATER QUALITY Purpose Water quality data are used to identify water quality problems resulting from non-point and/or point source pollution. Data can provide insight into the effectiveness of regulations and watershed management actions,`as well as a direct measure of environmental indicators(e.g.,miles of King County streams supporting Class A and AA uses). Water quality sampling is conducted in areas where extreme water quality degradation is a concern and where cumulative changes from upstream watershed activities will manifest themselves. Intensive water quality studies will not be proposed unless the initial reconnaissance storm sampling or ambient water quality sampling indicates serious problems exist. The primary sample collection method consists of grab samples taken during storm flow or low flows. Examples of management questions answered by May Creek water quality data are: • Is urban non-point pollution(sediment,nutrients,toxins,metals,etc.)a significant contribution to water quality degradation in May Creek? • Does May Creek water quality support beneficial uses(e.g.,Class A or AA standards)? Water Quality sampling is conducted by the King County Environmental Lab as part of the ambient water quality monitoring program. A sampling site near gauge 37A on May Creek has been tested since January 4, 1972 through September 12,2000. Data for this site can be found in the Lab's LIMS database under Locator#0440. 2 Exhibit Two Another site on the Renton-Issaquah Rd before SE May Valley Rd(locator#Y0440)was also sampled from January through December in 1978 generating 13 data sets. Water and sediment samples are collected as part of this program.Additional parameters have been added over time. The following data have been collected: Nutrients Total Metals(from ICP scan) Chlorinated Herbicides Total phosphorus(TP) Antimony 2,4,5-T Ortho-Phosphorus(OP) Arsenic 2,4,5-TP(Silvex) Total Nitrogen(TN) Barium 2,4-D Nitrite+Nitrate-Nitrogen(NO2+NO3-N) Beryllium 2,4-DB Ammonia-Nitrogen(NH3-N) Cadmium Calcium Fuel-related Parameters Miscellaneous Parameters Chromium Diesel Hardness Cobalt Gas Total Suspended Sediments(TSS) Copper Lube Oil Turbidity Iron pH Lead Biological Constituents Ambient air temperature Magnesium Fecal Coliform Ambient water temperature Molybdenum Enterococcus Conductivity Nickel E.Coli Dissolved Oxygen(Winkler) Selenium Total Solids Silver Staff height Thallium Discharge Vanadium Pebble Counts Zinc 3. SMALL LAKES MONITORING Purpose Through the Lake Stewardship Program,volunteers collect baseline data on over 45 lakes in King County to assess long-term water quality trends,assess seasonal and water column variability,identify water quality problems and propose further investigation and/or direct solutions. The program is split into two levels of data collection efforts:Level I and Level II. The Level I program participants measure surface water temperature,precipitation,lake level,color,and Secchi depth(clarity). The Level II program participants measure all Level I parameters,plus nutrients,chlorophyll a,phytoplankton,alkalinity,dissolved oxygen and hardness. Examples of questions answered by lake volunteer monitoring efforts are: • What is the current trophic(productivity)status of the lake? Has the status changed? • Are land use activities around the lake changing the trophic status of the lake? • Have lake levels changed over time? Do lake levels fluctuate widely? • Is recreational use of the lake affected by algal blooms or aquatic plant growth? • Are basin residents committed to long term stewardship and development of a lake management plan? Both Lake Kathleen and Lake Boren in the May Creek watershed are part of King County's Lake Stewardship Program. Exhibit Two 4. SALMON WATCHER PROGRAM Purpose In 1996,the Bellevue Stream Team,King County Water and Land Resources Division,the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe,the Snohomish County Surface Water Management Division,and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife began a volunteer spawning survey program in the Lake Washington Watershed(all waters draining through the Ballard Locks). In 1997,the program evolved into the Salmon Watcher Program and has been conducted annually since.The purpose of the program is to document the distribution of spawning adult salmon throughout the basin via an active public outreach and education program,and subsequently consolidate all the information into a single resource.These data can be used by resource managers and the public to improve how streams are managed,to protect salmon and trout species,and to enhance their habitat. Examples of questions answered by salmon volunteer monitoring efforts are: Which species of salmon spawn in May Creek? Where and when do salmon spawn in May Creek? This year,two volunteers will observe,identify and count spawning salmon in May Creek. In 1996,three volunteers observed and surveyed salmon in May Creek..A total of 1088 live and 124 dead sockeye were counted; 3 live chinook;8 live coho;and 3 live unidentified fish. In 1997:a pair of volunteers watched for a total of 14 surveys and saw no fish. In 1998 and 1999:no volunteers watched May Creek. Costs of monitoring activities currently carried out in the May Creek Basin and funded by King County are summarized in Table 2. Table 2. Current May Creek monitoring costs. 1. Hydrology $6,489 Current level of activity—two stream gauges and two rain gauges. 2. Water Quality $18,390 Current level of activity—one site. 3.Small Lakes Monitoring $22,397 Current level of activity—two lakes. 4.Salmon Watcher Volunteer Program - N/A(volunteer program data administered separately)Current level of activity. CURRENT ANNUAL COST $47,276 4 Exhibit Two ADDITIONAL PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Additional monitoring activities will be necessary to fully implement and evaluate the effectiveness of the May Creek Basin Plan. The additional monitoring activities are intended to answer questions that are directly related to the goals of the May Creek Action Plan but cannot be answered with the current monitoring activities.. All monitoring activities will focus on evaluating the May Creek Action Plan's key priority projects and management strategies. They will be divided up into two categories of activities,"Long term"and"Short term". "Long term"activities will be undertaken on a regular basis every year or every two years,depending on the activity. "Short term or special study activities"may be undertaken at periodic intervals as short-term projects such as CIPs or habitat improvement projects are undertaken. Most of these activities are assumed to occur as components of the capital projects recommended in the May Creek Basin Plan. Table 3 below shows the additional monitoring activities and costs. The section below Table 3 describes the additional monitoring recommendations with rationale. Table 3. May Creek monitoring activities with additional monitoring recommendations and costs Elm 'u Des iron fAetYi a µ. 1. Maintain two stream gauges at the 4 $6,489 $15,020 $21,509 $12,309 Hydrology mouth of May Creek and Coal Creek Parkway. Maintain two rain gauges. (fixed costs $9,200; NEW Add two new stream gauges: annual costs at the mouth of Boren Creek,and at =$5,820) the mouth of Country Creek below Licorice Fern development. Long Term 2. One ambient water quality 1,2,3,4, $18,390 $18,390 $18,390 Water monitoring site(#0440)is located at Quality the mouth of May Creek and will be continued. Long Term 3. Maintain at current levels 2,3 $22,397 $22,397 $22,397 Small Lakes Long Term Monitoring 4. Maintain and recruit more May 2,3 - - - - Volunteer Creek volunteers. Fish Long Term Surveys 5. Proposed for King Count Habitat 4 - Costs proposed N/A - Ravine Pre- Restoration Team(HRT)Prog. to be carried by project Spring 2001 as baseline info for WA state HRT Habitat and LWD projects. funding Fisheries Short Term Surveys TOTAL 47 2 6 15 O20 62 2 $�3 Q96 5 Exhibit Two HYDROLOGY In order to adequately characterize flows in May Creek,two additional stream gauges are recommended.The gauges would be sited at the mouth of Boren Creek and at the mouth of Country Creek below Licorice Fern development. The gauges would provide data to address the following questions: • What are the magnitudes of flood and base flows in these tributaries to May Creek? Are flood magnitudes or frequency increasing? Is base flow decreasing? • Is increased flooding or decreased base flow correlated to management activities in the tributaries? • What are existing flooding thresholds in these areas? • Are Capital Improvement Projects(CIPs)and small habitat restoration projects having cumulative beneficial impact on reducing erosion and flooding? The data would answer the questions:are flood magnitudes or frequency increasing and are base flows decreasing? WATER QUALITY Past storm sample data will be reviewed to determine if previous sampling and current sampling are adequate to characterize conditions and document problems associated with non-point and/or point source pollution. Additional water quality sampling sites may be recommended for a year of reconnaissance storm sampling to adequately characterize water quality in areas of likely problem areas:May Creek at Coal Creek Pkwy,mouth of Boren Creek,and mouth of Honey Creek.A long-term intensive water quality study will not be proposed unless the initial reconnaissance storm sampling or ambient water quality sampling indicates serious problems exist. LAKE STEWARDSHIP Lake Kathleen and Lake Boren in the May Creek watershed will continue volunteer activities as part of King County's Lake Stewardship Program. SALMON WATCH May Creek volunteers will continue their activities in the Salmon Watch Program. Local jurisdiction may be asked to assist in volunteer recruitment. Salmon Watch data can be used by citizens and local resource managers to manage and protect salmon and trout areas in the May Creek Basin. MAY CREEK RAVINE MONITORING AND ASSESMENT (Project Monitoring and Special Study Monitoring Activities) Monitoring and assessment of particular projects such as CIPs,small habitat projects,woody debris placements,etc.,will be undertaken as priority projects are implemented and funding allows. Project-monitoring activities will be conducted to evaluate the success and effectiveness of a particular project,i.e.,did the project meet intended goals? Some project monitoring will address more specific and geographically localized questions such as: Is the CIP having a cumulative beneficial impact on aquatic habitat and stream function? Are habitat enhancement projects reducing erosion and flooding,improving fish habitat,and preventing further degradation of the aquatic systems? Project monitoring activities will be undertaken in order of priority,as time and funding allows. These activities may not be performed by King County, but may be performed by the cities of Renton and/or Newcastle or other agencies involved in the Basin. 6 Exhibit Two Project monitoring activities usually consist of pre-monitoring and post-monitoring. Pre-monitoring activities are usually carried out before the project to assess the baseline conditions that will be expected to change or improve after the project is implemented. Pre-project monitoring data will be used for project design and permitting. Post-project monitoring activities are usually carried out after dompletion of the project and for a variable number of years depending on the goals of the project and the monitoring as well as permitting requirements.Post-project monitoring data will be analyzed and reported after completion of the project and/or post-project monitoring. The post-monitoring costs are not included here. Habitat enhancement of the lower May Creek ravine has been recommended in the May Creek Basin Action Plan. Pre-project monitoring will be necessary for project design and permitting of the project. Fisheries and habitat surveys would be carried out in the May Creek Ravine to fully characterize the fisheries use(species and life stages)in the ravine,as well as document existing habitat conditions. Project design would utilize the data to determine where and what type of enhancements(e.g.,woody debris placement)would be optimal for which species and life stages of fish. SUMMARY The May Creek Monitoring Plan and all activities carried out in this plan should provide information needed to meet,make,alter, and evaluate watershed management decisions which derive from the actions taken as implementation of the basin plan. Proposed Cost-share Arrangement for May Creek Basin Action Plan Monitoring(recommendation#3): o rm n __+4 ti 2001rym ~2002+ 2001 2002+ 2001v 2002+ 2001 - 2002+ Hydrology $9,333 $4,103 $6,088 $4,103 $6,088 $4,103 $21,509 $12,309 Water Quality12,260 6,130 3,065 6,130 3065 6,130 18,390 18,390 Volunteer Lake Monitors 22,397 22,397 - - - - 22,397 22,397 Salmon Watcher Separately Separately Program funded funded - - - - - - Ravine Separately Separately channel/habitat funded funded survey - - - - - Total Cost 43 0 32 630 9.153 10 233 9.153 10 233 62 2 6 026 This Cost-share Arrangement assumes that: ■ King County will bear all monitoring costs for ongoing monitoring activities through 2°d Quarter 2001,and costs for 3`d and 4 h quarters will be prorated and cost-shared by the three jurisdictions. ■ Additional hydrological monitoring costs will be accrued beginning 7/1/2001 and will be shared evenly among all jurisdictions. ■ The two additional stream gauges included in these costs are not scoped to include telemetry functions ■ The scope of monitoring activities and their costs will be subject to regular review and potential change by the May Creek Basin Committee. These changes will be appended to the implementation Interlocal agreement once approved by the Basin Committee,and regarding costs,the parties they represent. 7 PROJECTEQUST '021YI P ING/BUILDING/PhBLIC 0RKS SOME SECTIONS APPLY TO CIP AND SOME APPLY TO DEVELOPER PROJECTS FILE STATUS EXISTING OR NE FILE CODE(PR1-xx-xxxx): LOCATION My Work Space: File Bay Shelf#: Other: OF Rf3JEG`TIAME # �« '� � � eIIl�e.tine) Allbvaliloldec;file( IC3NsSEfA1 IA1"CHLJ iv � o rie tWo) x DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Gr("Y5�oy,c' e Ed c FT' K,'r24 6,, r",h,,., t)sti'L'` ADDRESS/STREET NAME(S): / � f DEV/CN'TR/OWN/CNSLT: OTHER ALIASES: Circle Size of Waterlline: 8" 10" 12" Circle One: New/Replace/Extension Circle Size of Sewerline: 8" 10" 12" Circle One: New/Replace/Extension Circle Size of Stormline: 12" 18" 24" Circle One New/Replace/Extension c y .tea t �;u kw `ems H> Ic � TED(roadway/dfainage) (off site improvements) (include TESL) TRO (Signalization,Channelization,Lighting) WWP(wastewater) (sanitary sewer main) WTR(water) (Mains,Valves,Hydrants) (inc.composite&HorizontalCtrl) SWP(surface water imp.) (CIP only)(mclude basin name) PLR(plan review) (Neccessary for developer files) = (letter only) FOR FILE MAINTAINANCE USE ONLY File Codes: Date Entered and Labels Made: RgtformNEWPROJ.doc r