HomeMy WebLinkAboutSWP272960(1) c /US
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RENTON AND
KING COUNTY
SECTION 1 . RECITALS
1 . 1 The City of Renton (the "City") is an optional municipal code
city of the State of Washington. The City has responsibility
for, among other things, the regulation of development
through its shoreline, land use, building and other codes,
and the management of its parks, streets and municipal
utilities within its jurisdiction.
1.2 King County (the "County") is a political subdivision of the
State of Washington and a "Home Rule" Charter county created
pursuant to Article 11, Section 4 of the Washington
Constitution. Pursuant to a public vote, the County assumed
the rights, powers and obligations of the former Municipality
of Metropolitan Seattle ("METRO") effective January 1, 1994 .
As a result, the County now performs the function of water
pollution abatement pursuant to RCW 35 . 58 . 050 (1) .
1 . 3 By Resolution No. 23, adopted April 22, 1959 the former METRO
Council adopted a Comprehensive Sewage Disposal Plan for the
Seattle-King County Metropolitan area. In accordance with the
authority granted by RCW 35 . 58 . 200, this plan as been re-
designated the Comprehensive Water Pollution Abatement Plan.
The Comprehensive Water Pollution Abatement Plan has been
supplemented and amended from time to time.
1 . 4 The County is responsible for constructing and operating all
regional wastewater conveyance facilities in King County.
1. 5 In order to restore capacity in the Eastside Interceptor
Section 1, the County must construct a new 72-inch diameter
bypass pipeline from the intersection of Burnett Avenue South
and Houser Way South, along Houser Way South to the
intersection of Morris Avenue South, along Morris Avenue
South to the intersection of South 7tn Street, all in the City
of Renton.
1 . 6 With the support of County funding, the City wishes to
undertake certain mitigation and neighborhood projects
described herein as full and complete mitigation for any
adverse impacts associated with the County' s contemplated
improvements to the Eastside Interceptor Section 1 .
1 . 7 The City is willing to design, construct, operate and
maintain the mitigation and neighborhood projects, provided
they are funded by the County as set forth herein. In
addition to its funding commitments regarding the City' s
mitigation and neighborhood projects, the County is willing
to design, construct, operate and maintain an upgraded
Eastside Interceptor Section 1 as set forth herein.
1 . 8 As a second primary purpose of this Agreement, therefore, the
County and the City agree to work collaboratively to resolve
11/08/00 2 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
all City permitting and approval requirements in order to
expedite the construction of the contemplated improvements to
the Eastside Interceptor Section 1 . In particular, the City
agrees to expedite to the fullest degree possible in
complying with all state and local laws including SEPA, the
processing of all City permits and approvals associated with
the Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration
Project.
1. 9 Execution of this Agreement has been duly authorized by the
the City and the County.
SECTION 2 . DEFINITIONS
For purposes of this Agreement, the terms underlined below shall
have the following meanings:
2 . 1 Agreement - this Agreement.
2 .2 City — the City of Renton, Washington, a municipal
corporation and an optional municipal code city of the State
of Washington.
2. 3 Administrator (City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works
Administrator) or his/her designee - that individual or
his/her designated representative (s) responsible for
coordinating and facilitating City personnel, private
contractors and consultants, and financing matters in
connection with the City' s Mitigation and Neighborhood
Projects and for overseeing City land use and regulatory
11/08/00 3 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
approval processes related to the County' s Eastside
Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration Project.
2 . 4 City Project Manager - that individual or his/her designated
representative (s) appointed by the Administrator to carry out
the specific project-related responsibilities set forth in
this Agreement.
2 . 5 Compensate or Compensation - the County' s activities to
design, fund, construct, own, operate, maintain or manage or
take actions to offset impacts associated with the Eastside
Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration Project by
replacing, enhancing or providing substitute resources or
environments, as allowed under WAC 197-11-768 (5) and which
meets the following:
— Mitigate or fund mitigation projects related to the
direct and indirect impacts of construction and
operation of the Project;
— Compensate for unavoidable impacts on residential
neighborhoods, private property and the urban
environment associated with the Project;
— Direct mitigation toward actions taken;
— Relate the cost of mitigating measures to the impacts;
— Where possible foster coincident benefits with other
projects; and
11/08/00 4 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
Base mitigation on facility performance and site
characteristics, and not on a uniform technology-based
standard.
2 . 6 County - King County, Washington, a political subdivision of the
State of Washington and Home Rule Charter county created pursuant
to Article 11, Section 4 of the Washington Constitution.
2 . 7 County Project Manager - that individual appointed by the
Manager of the Wastewater Treatment Division, King County
Department of Natural Resources to carry out coordinating
responsibilities as set forth in this Agreement .
2 . 8 Disbursement - any moneys transferred to the City by the
County pursuant to this Agreement.
2 . 9 Disbursement Date - any date on which the County pays
Disbursements to the City.
2 . 10 Implement or Implementation -- activities to plan, design,
fund, construct, own, operate, maintain, mitigate or
otherwise manage or take action to carry out Mitigation and
Neighborhood Project or the Eastside Interceptor Section 1
Project.
2 . 11 Include or Including - including but not limited to.
2 . 12 Initial Disbursement - the first Disbursement under this
Agreement.
2 . 13 Initial Disbursement Date - the date of the Initial
Disbursement.
11/08/00 5 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
2 . 14 Mitigation and Neighborhood Projects - projects designed and
constructed by the City and financed in whole or part with
King County funds under Section 4 of this Agreement .
2 . 16 Permitting, Permit Review, Permit Processing - the procedures
or process of analyzing or deciding upon any license, permit,
approval or concurrence by the City with respect to the
System Improvement Projects.
2 . 17 Project Managers - the City Project Manager and the County
Project Manager.
2 . 18 Project Schedule - the schedule recognized by the City and
County for permitting and constructing the System Improvement
Projects .
SECTION 3. PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
3. 1 Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project Schedule. As set forth
in Exhibit A-1, the County' s permitting work for the project
began in August 2000 and is scheduled to be completed by
January 2001 . The City agrees to use its best efforts to
assist the County in meeting the Project Schedule for the
Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project. The SEPA checklist
and determination for this project is attached as Exhibit A-
2 .
3. 2 The City shall in good faith exercise its best efforts,
including the use of all legal and practicable means, to
facilitate and not hinder the County' s ability to begin and
complete construction and implementation of the Eastside
11/08/00 6 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
Interceptor Section 1 Project in accordance with their
respective Projects Schedule, including the following:
(a) To use its best efforts to expeditiously process
all project permits required from the City to allow
timely commencement of site preparation work in
accordance with applicable Project Schedules;
(b) Ensuring that City review of all County permit
applications is timely completed and that notices
for all public hearings are timely issued;
(c) Devoting staff time and other resources reasonably
necessary to process permits as described in
subsection (b) above;
(d) Supporting the mitigation measures described herein
before the public and other regulatory agencies
reviewing and approving the mitigation measures, and not
recommending or seeking additional mitigation or
compensation in connection with the Eastside Interceptor
Section 1 Project;
(e) Acknowledging that the mitigation measures described
herein are adequate to mitigate all environmental
impacts associated with the Eastside Interceptor Section
1 Project and that no additional mitigation is necessary
or appropriate;
11/08/00 7 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
(f) Assisting the County in avoiding or defending any
appeals of Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project
permits or other approvals required for the Project; and
(g) Agreeing not to encourage other individuals or entities
to oppose, appeal, or otherwise delay the beginning of
construction work being scheduled.
3. 3 The County will take reasonable steps to secure its necessary
permits and approvals, including timely submission of related
applications.
SECTION 4 . MITIGATION AND COMPENSATION
4 . 1 General . In consideration for (a) adverse construction and
other impacts on the City of Renton associated with the
Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project; and (b) the City' s
best efforts to expeditiously process all necessary City of
Renton permits and approvals associated with the Project, the
County shall pay Disbursements to the City to support the
design and construction of the Mitigation and Neighborhood
Projects in accordance with subsections 4 . 2, 4 . 3, 4 . 4, 4 . 5,
and 4 . 6 below. Payment for the review of land use
applications associated with the County' s Eastside
Interceptor Section 1 Project, including all permit review
and processing services provided by the City, shall be paid
pursuant to a City Ordinance No.
4 .2 County Funding in Support of Mitigation and Neighborhood
Projects . The County shall fund $ in support of City
11/08/00 8 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
designed and constructed Mitigation and Neighborhood Projects
in accordance with the terms and conditions of this
Agreement. Such Projects shall consist primarily of community
improvements within the City designed to mitigate impacts on
the City of Renton associated with the County' s Eastside
Interceptor Section 1 Project. Subject to subsection 4 . 6
below, the County shall pay to the City one Disbursement as
follows:
-- Within 30 days of the City' s issuance of
permits necessary for the County to begin
construction of the Eastside Interceptor
Section 1 Project - $
4 .3 City Funding of Storm Sewer and Water Line Work Along Morris Avenue
South. The City shall reimburse the County for associated
engineering and construction costs for the storm sewer and water
line work along Morris Avenue South in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this agreement. Subject to subsection 4 . 6 below,
the City shall pay the County the following Disbursements :
- all associated engineering costs within 30 days after the
Notice to Proceed of construction of the Eastside
Interceptor Section 1 Project. These costs shall include
the Design Consultant' s costs related to the storm sewer
and water line work during design.
- All associated construction costs 30 days after the
Substantial Completion of the construction of the Eastside
Interceptor Section 1 Project. These costs include the
Contractor' s costs, Design Consultant' s costs, and
Construction Management Consultant' s costs related to the
storm sewer and water line work during construction.
4 .4 Waterline Extension Work. In consideration for limiting
construction impacts to the local neighborhood, the
County will install a waterline extension under the
Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad tracks at the
intersection of Houser Way South and Morris Avenue
South. The County will pay for all design, permitting,
11/08/00 9 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
and construction costs for this work. The City agrees
to provide technical support for this portion of work
4 . 5 Storm Sewer/Water Line Work along Morris Avenue South. In
consideration for limiting construction impacts to the local
neighborhood, the County will install a new 12 inch to 18 inch
storm sewer line along Morris Avenue South from Houser way South
to South 7th Streetand a new 12 inch water line along Morris Avenue
South from South 5th Street to South 7th Street. The City agrees
to reimburse the County for all costs associated with engineering
and construction of the new storm sewer and water line. The City
will provide technical assistance during the design process. King
County staff time will not be reimbursed by the City.
4 . 6 Conditions of Payment. It shall be a condition precedent to
any Disbursement or County expenditure of funds under
subsection 4 . 2, 4 . 3, 4 . 4, and 4 . 5 above that the County has
received all City permits necessary to proceed with
construction (provided that King County and the City have
taken reasonable steps to secure such permits) . If the City
permits are appealed, the Disbursement will not occur until
all such appeals have been resolved, allowing construction to
begin.
SECTION 5. RESPONSIBILITIES
5 . 1 City Responsibilities . The City shall have full
responsibility for design, permitting, construction, operation
and maintenance of the Mitigation and Neighborhood Project
improvements .
(a) The City shall be responsible for the following project
related activities in connection with Mitigation and
Neighborhood Projects :
11/08/00 10 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
1 . Performing all aspects of project design.
2 . Obtaining all necessary permits .
3. Performing all aspects of construction.
4 . Providing final acceptance of all facilities
from the construction contractor.
5 . Operating and maintaining all facilities .
(b) The City shall also provide the County with progress
reports according to the following schedule:
1 . Annual progress report
2 . Provide annual reports for seven years from
the date of the agreement.
(c) Ownership of all facilities constructed under this
section shall be with the City; all operation and
maintenance responsibilities and costs shall similarly
be the obligation of the City.
(d) The City shall assume all liability for the design,
construction, operation and maintenance of all
facilities constructed under this section.
5 . 2 County Responsibilities . The County shall:
(a) Submit to the City all notices from the County of award
of a contract for the construction of the Eastside
Interceptor Section 1 Project.
SECTION 6. CITY USE OF DISBURSEMENTS
6. 1 Conditions of Disbursement . Subject to the conditions
established by subsection 4 . 2, the Disbursement to the City
shall be conditioned upon compliance by the City with the
terms of this Agreement and the issuance of a Notice to
11/08/00 11 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
Proceed to a Contractor for construction and implementation
by the County of the Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project .
6. 2 Maximum Disbursement Amount . In no event shall the total
amount of Disbursement to the City pursuant to this Agreement
exceed $ for the Mitigation and Neighborhood Projects.
In no event shall the total amount of Disbursement to the
County pursuant to this Agreement exceed $ for the
Storm Sewer and Water Line.
6. 3 City Expenditure of Disbursement. The City shall deposit,
invest, and expend all moneys received from the County
pursuant to this Agreement consistent with the terms of this
Agreement. Subject to subsection 6. 4, the City agrees to the
following:
(a) The money shall be expended for public purposes on
capital improvements to, or acquisition of, real
property.
(b) During construction of all Mitigation and Neighborhood
Projects, the City will include the County as a funding
source for any project for which the City would provide
signing.
(c) Mitigation and Neighborhood Projects acquired,
developed, constructed or improved by the City in whole
or in part from Disbursement made pursuant to this
11/08/00 12 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
Agreement shall not be transferred or conveyed except by
the City' s standard method.
(d) All Disbursements received by the City and interest
thereon shall be expended solely on the Mitigation and
Neighborhood Projects contemplated by this Agreement.
(e) The City shall invest all Disbursements pending
expenditure. Investment earnings on such moneys shall be
applied to uses permitted for Disbursements under this
Agreement.
6. 4 Permanent Maintenance Fund. Notwithstanding subsection 6. 3 (a) ,
the City may set aside up to 0 of Disbursements in a
permanent trust fund. Interest earned on moneys invested in
this trust fund shall be used for operation and maintenance
of the capital improvements constructed with Disbursements .
Moneys in the fund shall be invested in a manner that permits
interest income thereon to be spent regularly for such
purposes. The Disbursements contributed to the fund shall be
retained therein as a permanent source of income for
maintenance and operation of such capital improvements .
6. 5 Annual Reports. The City shall submit Annual Reports to the
County. The first Annual Report shall be submitted on or
before the first anniversary of the Disbursement Date.
Subsequent Annual Reports shall be submitted not later than
the anniversary each year of the Disbursement Date, and
11/08/00 13 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
continuing until all funds subject to this Agreement have
been expended. Each Annual Report shall include:
(a) An accounting for any Disbursement received during the
prior years including the amount of funds expended
within that year, total funds expended to date, interest
accrued, and a list of project for which funds were
expended. Expenditure reports shall establish that all
Disbursements have been expended in the manner
contemplated by this Agreement.
SECTION 7 . ALLOCATION AND ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES
7 . 1 Common Overall Responsibilities . The County' s Wastewater
Treatment Division Manager and the Administrator shall:
(a) Serve as the point of contact and liaison during
Mitigation and Neighborhood Project and Eastside
Interceptor Section 1 Project implementation (to each
agency and to other governmental agencies) . This
responsibility may be delegated to other staff members
of each agency for particular functions or purposes by
mutual consent of the Administrator and the County' s
Wastewater Treatment Division Manager. This
responsibility does not abridge statutory or certain
permit issuance responsibilities of other City
officials, boards or commissions .
(b) Use collaborative problem solving and negotiation
11/08/00 14 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
techniques to review and attempt to resolve perceived
conflicts that cannot be resolved by the Project
Managers .
(c) Review and revise, as necessary, the Project Schedules
contained in Exhibit
7 . 2 Common Project Manager Responsibilities . The County Project
Manager shall have responsibility for the Eastside
Interceptor Section 1 Project. The City Project Manager shall
have responsibility for the Mitigation and Neighborhood
Projects. The Project Managers shall:
(a) Provide each other, within a reasonable amount of time,
with current and necessary information as requested that
pertains to their respective responsibilities under the
Agreement, in order to expedite review.
(b) Use collaborative problem solving and negotiation
techniques to identify and attempt to resolve issues
related to implementation of all Projects contemplated
under this Agreement.
(c) Convene meetings as necessary with the County Wastewater
Treatment Division Manager and the Administrator to
discuss substantive issues, the project schedules, and
activities related to the design, construction and
implementation of all Projects contemplated under this
Agreement.
11/08/00 15 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
(d) Meet with the City and County technical, interagency and
citizen advisory committees and other interested persons
as needed to carry out the purposes of this Agreement .
(e) Be given, upon request, reasonable opportunities to
brief the City Council and/or County Executive and
County Council on the status of all Projects
contemplated under this Agreement.
(f) The City Project Manager shall coordinate and facilitate
plans and permit processing by the City so as to
expedite the City' s review and approval of any plans,
reviews, and permits related to the Eastside Interceptor
Section 1 Project .
SECTION 8 . DISPUTE RESOLUTION
8 . 1 Resolution of Disputes by Project Managers . The Project
Managers shall use their best efforts to resolve disputes and
issues arising out of or related to the Projects contemplated
under this Agreement.
8 . 2 Resolution of Disputes by County Wastewater Treatment
Division Manager and Administrator. In the event that
disputes cannot be resolved by Project Managers the County
Wastewater Treatment Division Manager and Administrator will
apply their best efforts to resolve disputes and other
matters between the County and the City arising out of or
related to the Projects contemplated by this Agreement. Each
will consult with responsible agency staff members and
11/08/00 16 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
officials regarding existing requirements or other policies
and procedures before attempting to resolve disputes .
8 . 3 Resolution of Disputes by Administrator and County Executive.
If the Wastewater Treatment Division and Administrator are
unable to resolve a matter within fifteen (15) days of the
time such matter is properly referred to them, the City Mayor
and County Executive shall be asked to resolve the dispute,
subject to applicable statutory permit requirements, policies
or procedures. In the event of an emergency, either Manager
may (after notifying the other Manager) refer a Project-
related dispute immediately to the City Mayor and Executive
for resolution. The City Mayor and Executive may call upon
their staff for assistance.
8 . 4 Exhaustion of Procedural Steps. The County and the City
agree to exhaust each of these procedural steps before
seeking to resolve disputes in formal mediation, arbitration
or court of law or other tribunal, except to the extent that
these procedures may conflict with formal administrative
appeal procedures.
SECTION 9. INDEMNIFICATION; TERM OF AGREEMENT
9. 1 Indemnification. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable
law, the City and the County shall each protect, indemnify,
defend and hold harmless the other, respectively, including
its employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors, officers,
directors, attorneys, successors and assigns, from and
11/08/00 17 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
against any and all liabilities, damages, claims, demands,
judgments, losses, harm, costs, expenses, suits or actions,
including but not limited to appeals, caused by the negligent
acts or omissions of the indemnifying party, including its
agents, employees, contractors, subcontractors, officers,
directors, attorneys, successors or assigns, arising out of
or in connection with or as a result of this Agreement or the
performance by the indemnifying party of any of its
obligations hereunder.
9. 2 Term. This Agreement shall be effective commencing on the first
date when it has been duly authorized and executed by both
the County and the City. Except as otherwise specifically
provided herein, this Agreement shall expire upon the
completion of all Projects contemplated hereunder; provided
that the Agreement may be terminated at an earlier or later
date by mutual written agreement of the Parties .
SECTION 10 . MISCELLANEOUS
10. 1 Notices to King County. Until the County notifies the City in
writing otherwise, all notices to the County required under
the terms of this Agreement shall be given in writing,
addressed as follows :
Don Theiler
Wastewater Treatment Division Manager
King County Department of Natural Resources
201 South Jackson Street, M.S. KSC-NR-0503
11/08/00 18 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
Seattle, Washington 98104-3855
Notices by facsimile or e-mail, if receipt is confirmed, may
be used to expedite, but not replace, the above procedure.
The County' s facsimile number is 206-684-1741 . The e-mail
address is donald.theiler@metrokc.gov
10 . 2 Notices to the City. Until the City notifies the County in
writing otherwise, all notices to the City required under the
terms of this Agreement shall be given in writing, addressed
as follows :
Gregg Zimmerman, P.E.
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator
The City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, Washington 98055
Notices by facsimile or e-mail, if receipt is confirmed, may
also be used to expedite, but not replace, the above
procedure. The City' s facsimile number is 425-430-7241 . The
e-mail address is gzimmerman@ci . renton.wa.us
10. 3 Timing of Notices. All written notices required under this
Agreement shall be deemed received three (3) business days
after the day they were mailed, or eight (8) regular business
hours after they were sent out for hand delivery to the
addressee. Transmitted and confirmed delivery of written
notices via telephone facsimile, while expediting reviews and
11/08/00 19 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
possible responses, will not be considered official
notification.
10 . 4 Assignment . This Agreement may not be assigned by either
party without the prior written consent or the other party.
10. 5 Relationship of the Parties. Nothing in this Agreement is
intended to create a partnership or constitute a joint
venture between the City and the County. No party to this
Agreement shall have any responsibility to perform services
or to assume contractual obligations which are the obligation
of the other party. Nothing herein shall make either party an
agent or representative of the other party, or create any
fiduciary relationship between them.
10 . 6 Waiver. Unless otherwise specifically provided by the terms
of this Agreement, no delay or failure to exercise a right
resulting from any breach of this Agreement shall impair such
right or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but such
right may be exercised from time to time and as often as may
be deemed expedient. Any waiver shall be in writing and
signed by the party granting such waiver. If any
representation, warranty or covenant contained in this
Agreement is breached by either party and thereafter waived
by the other party, such waiver shall be limited to the
particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive
any other breach under this Agreement.
11/08/00 20 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
10 . 7 Effect of Recitals . The recitals set forth in Section 1 above
are a material part of this Agreement and are fully
incorporated in its terms.
10. 8 Section Captions, References . The section headings and
captions contained herein are included for convenience only
and shall not be considered a part hereof or affect in any
manner the construction or interpretation hereof. Except as
otherwise indicated, all references herein to sections and
subsections are to sections and subsections of this
Agreement .
10 . 9 Severability. In the event that any provision of this
Agreement shall, for any reason, be determined to be invalid,
illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the parties hereto
shall negotiate in good faith and agree to such amendments,
modifications or supplements of or to this Agreement or such
other actions as shall, to the maximum extent practicable in
light of such determination, implement and give effect to the
intentions of the parties as reflected herein. The other
provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.
10. 10 Amendment . This document may not be amended except by a
written agreement signed by the parties .
10. 11 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
11/08/00 21 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
Washington. The venue for any actions hereunder shall be the
King County Superior Court.
10. 12 No Other Agreements . All negotiations, proposals and
agreements prior to the date of this Agreement with respect
to the subject matter hereof are merged herein and superseded
hereby.
10 . 13 Limitation of Liability. The obligations of the County under
this Agreement are payable solely from King County' s Water
Quality Operating Account . This Agreement is not intended
as, nor shall it be construed as, a debt or general
obligation of King County. The execution or performance of
this Agreement shall not impose any personal liability on any
member, officers employee, agent, advisor, or consultant of
either the County or the City.
10. 14 Successors and Assigns . This Agreement shall be binding on
both parties and their successors and assigns .
10 . 15 Execution of Documents. This Agreement may be executed in
duplicate originals, and any such duplicate original shall be
regarded for all purposes as an original and all of which
shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
10. 16 No Third-Party Beneficiaries . In promising performance to
one another under this Agreement, the Parties intend to
create binding legal obligations to and rights of enforcement
in (i) one another, and (ii) one anther' s permitted assignees
or successors in interest . The parties expressly do not
11/08/00 22 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
intend to create any obligation or liability, or promise any
performance to, any third party. The parties have not created
for any third party any right to enforce this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and County have caused this Agreement
to be executed in their respective names, have caused their
respective seals to be hereto affixed, and have caused this
Agreement to be attested, all by their duly authorized
officers, and the City and the County have caused this
Agreement to be dated as of the date and year first written
above.
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON CITY OF RENTON
By By
Its Its
Date: Date:
Approved as to form: Approved as to form:
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney City Attorney
11/08/00 23 MOA Renton rev 100600.doc
t ;
King County
Wastewater Treatment Division
Department of Natural Resources
King County Department Of Natural Resources
Wastewater Treatment Division
Eastside Interceptor Project
Section Capacity Restoration Project
Contract C03070C
Preconstruction Conference
November 7, 2001 1:00 PM
This Contract consists of furnishing and installing approximately 1,820 linear feet of 72-inch
sanitary sewer and two junction structures for King County. In addition, the contract consists of
furnishing materials and labor required to install other appurtenant structures and perform
excavation, spoils removal, backfill, dewatering, trench support system, utility relocation and
replacement, special bedding, miscellaneous site work and paving, and other work required to
properly complete the project in accordance with the Contract Documents.
A secondary portion of the contract is the installation of approximately 1,300 LF of 12-inch
watermain, reconnection of lateral watermains and existing domestic services, including meters;
550 LF of 18-inch and 650 LF of 12-inch storm sewer, new catch basins and manholes.
Location: Renton, Washington
Contract Number: C03070C
Contractor: Frank Coluccio Construction Company
Contract Amount: $ 4,493,000.00
Notice To Proceed: November 12, 2001
Contract Time : 412 Calendar Days
King County DNRIWTD-Mail Stop RNC-NR-0100 ♦'*
Eastside Interceptor Section I Field Office
South Treatment Plant
1200 Monster Road SW
Renton, WA 98055
Phone 206-263-5432
Fax 206-263-5437
F \
J
.
� l
A7'T�CKAVE:S:_ _
w WHITWORTH:AVE
® � y \\\INCtQ..\\'N'O.RRK\\Mi\\'ICP'�R\!\'R1\\W •.rt�=: - ._—x__-_.__ ___..__..._..._.._.. .._._
ltt FR,S�AVEiSy
�;. ..
tt
7,NjT-T.AVE:S...(t
_ 1
c�
� � � �� - --_•� :__.--_-�::-:::_•_:�__:.ter:.:-• -y_:�,_.
1 ► �
� 0 1
t ■ ■ ® � o 0000
D I xx Jim 5 9
to � g
14
�- > s € IRA €
7q o _
O .rFMI SIZE,V MOT ONE
INCH SC4[ICCOPdNCIY
King County
Wastewater Treatment Division
Department of Natural Resources
King County Department Of Natural Resources
Wastewater Treatment Division
Eastside Interceptor Project
Section Capacity Restoration Project
Contract C03070C
Preconstruction Conference
November 7, 2001 1:00 PM
AGENDA
1. Project Review- Glen Hiraki
2. Introductions and Responsibilities- Glen Hiraki
• King County
• Construction Management Consultant (CIVIC)
• Design Consultants
• Contractor
• City of Renton
• Utility owners
• BNSF Railroad
• Public Relations
3. Project Schedule- Don Bergman
4. Coordination and Communication - Scott Clemons
• Communication
• Project Hours
• Traffic
• Permits
• Inspection and Testing
• Project Phases
.*r
5. Community Concerns- Kathy Albert
6. Construction Issues- Bill Cranston
7. Closing Comments- Glen Hiraki
Break
8. Site Safety -Wyatt Wood
9. Apprenticeship - Bob Forgie
10.Contract Administration- Scott Clemons
• Submittals, RFI's
• Materials sampling and testing
• Notifications
• Inspections
• Record drawings
11.Contract Administration- Sholi Oiye
• Retainage
• Schedule of values
• Taxes
• Payments
• Change Orders
12.Meetings- Scott Clemons
• Weekly progress/Coordination
• Pre-activity for major phases of work
13.Closing Comments- Scott Clemons
King County
Eastside Interceptor Project - Contract C03070C
CONTACT LIST
ESI Project Office
Mailing address:
King County
Eastside Interceptor Project Office
1200 Monster Road SW
Renton,WA 98055
responsibility phone fax e-mail
PROJECT HOTLINE Public Relations Pager 206-205-9283
Glen Hiraki Project Representative 206-684-2442 206-684-2488 glen.hiraki@metrokc.gov
Scott Clemons Office Engineer 206-263-5428 206-263-5437 clemons@kbacm.com
Shoji Oiye Project Controls 206-684-2430 206-263-5437 shoji.oiye@vanir.com
Angela Beckman Document Controls 206-263-5432 206-263-5437 angela.beckman@vanir.com
Stan Burns Inspector (� � �J�g- v jy 206-263-3203 206-684-2091 stan.bums@metrokc.gov
Kim Staheli Louch Tunneling 206-297-8152 206-297-8150 kstaheli@msn.com
Troy Pyles CM Support 425-577-0095 425-451-8971 troy.pyles@vanir.com
Kristen Betty CM Support 425455-9720 425-455-9732 kbetty@kbacm.com
Frank Coluccio Construction Co.
Mailing address:
Frank Coluccio Construction Co.
9600 M L King Way South
Seattle,WA 98118-5693
responsibility phone fax e-mail
Don Bergman Project Manager 206-722-5306 206-725-4764 isdonthere@yahoo.com
Kathleen Kasparik Document Control 206-722-5306 206-7254764 Kathleen@caluccio.com
Tetra Tech/KCM,Inc.
Mailing address:
Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc
1917 First Avenue
Seattle,WA 98101-1027
responsibility phone fax e-mail
Bill Cranston Design Engineer 206-443-2540 206-443-5372 wcranston@kcminc.com
Page 1 of 3
King County
Eastside Interceptor Project - Contract C03070C
CONTACT LIST
King Countv
responsibility phone fax e-mail
Arnaud Girard Industrial Waste Program 206-263-3012
Bob Forgie Apprenticeship Coordinator 206-263-4591
Christy Sanders-Meena Construction Manager 206-684-1825 christy.sanders-meena@metrokc.gov
Dave Dittmar Project Manager 206-684-1813 206-684-1710 dave.dittmar@metrokc.gov
Doug Nine Community Relations 206-296-8228
Rod Boyd Permits 206-296-7815
Ron Kohler WWTD Offsite Supervisor 206-684-2403
Wyatt Wood Safety 206-684-1319
City of Renton
Mailing address:
City of Renton
1055 S Grady Way
Renton,WA 98055
responsibility phone fax e-mail
Dave Christensen Head of Sewer Engineering 425-430-7212 425-430-7241
Fire Department Fire Department 425-430-7000
Karl Hamilton Transportation Systems 425-430-7220
Kayren Kittrick Engineering Manager 425-430-7299 425-430-7300
Ron Straka Head of Stormwater Engineering 425-430-7248
Abdoul Gafour Head of Water Engineering 425-430-7210
Water Maintenance Water Maintenance 425-430-7400
Page 2 of 3
King County
Eastside Interceptor Project - Contract C03070C
CONTACT LIST
Others
Company responsibility phone fax e-mail
Kathy Albert Enviro Issues Public Relations 206-296-5041 206-269-5046 kalbert@enviroissues.com
Eric Andersen HWA GeoSciences Inc. Geotechnical Eng 425-774-0106 425-774-2714 endersen@hwageo.com
Ralph Boirum HWA GeoSciences Inc. Geotechnical Eng. PE 425-774-0106 425-774-2714 rboirum@hongwest.com
Doug Bacon Spirit of WA. Dinner Train General Manager 425 277-8408
Jimmy Pang BNSF Railroad Roadmaster 206-625-6462 jimmy.pang@bnsf.com
Ken Jennison BNSF Railroad Shoring submittal review 913-551-4164
Utility Companies
Company responsibility phone fax e-mail
Eric Clayton Electric Lightwave Underground Utilities 216-812-2338 eclayton@eli.net
Michael Fulmer MCl/Worldcomm Underground Utilities 253-872-4005 michael.fulmer@wcom.com
Joe Jainga Puget Sound Energy Power Utilities 425462-3807 jjaing@puget.com
Al Dillbeck Starcom/AT&T Canada Underground Utilities 888-904-0400
Frank Forest US West Aboveground Utilities 206-345-2968
Art Netters AT&T Aboveground Utilities 253-437-6920 anettles@broadband.att.com
Page 3 of 3
King County
Wastewater Treatment Division �'m'OF
Department of Natural Resources RE �
NI)V __
MEMORANDUM "U'Ltjijy ; vIVIS1ON
DATE: November 13, 2001
TO: Christy Sanders Meena—King County ESC-NR-0100
Bob Williams—King County KSC-NR-0600
David Dittmar—King County KSC-NR-0501
Bob Fergie— King County EXC-FL-0355 RECEIVED
Stan Burns—King County NSJ-NR-0100 NOV 5
Bill Cranston —Tetra Tech /KCM 2001
Eric Andersen—Geo-Technical Engineer CITY OF RENTON
Kristen Betty - Kristen Betty & Associates, Inc. UTILITY SYSTEMS
R. Scott Clemons—Kristen Betty & Associates, Inc.
Shoji Oiye—Vanir Construction Management
Troy Piles—Vanir Construction Management
Alecia Cline - Vanir Construction Management
Kim Staheli Louch—Bennett Staheli Engineers
Kathy Albert - EnviroIssues
Devon Brown—EnviroIssues
Kayren Kittrick—City of Renton
Jan Illian —City of Renton
Allen Quynn —City of Renton
Joe Coluccio—Frank Coluccio Construction Company
Don Bergman —Frank Coluccio Construction Company
Heather Meeds— Frank Coluccio Construction Company
FROM: Glen Hiraki
SUBJECT: Preconstruction Conference Meeting Minutes
Attached are the Minutes for the Preconstruction Conference for the Eastside Interceptor Project-
003070C held November 71", 2001 at 1:00 pm at the Renton Treatment Plant. We would appreciate any
comments or corrections.
Glen
K:I Correspondence lForms WC Memo.doc �441W
King County
EASTSIDE INTERCEPTOR PROJECT
C03070C
Preconstruction Conference Meeting Minutes
Date: November 7, 2001
Time: 1:00 PM.
Location: Renton Treatment Plant Conference Room
Item 1- Proiect Review—Glen Hiraki
• Glen welcomed everyone, and handed out the preconstruction packet that included:
description of the contract, mailing address for the field office,a map of the project site, the
preconstruction conference agenda, and the current contact list for this project. Handout "A"
(available upon request).
• Those in attendance introduced themselves, their company and their project role.
Introductions and Responsibilities—all
King County EnviroIssues
Rod Boyd—Permits Kathy Albert—Community Relations
Glen Hiraki—Project Representative Devon Brown—Community Relations
Bill Williams—Treatment Plant City of Renton
David Dittmar—Project Manager Kayren Kittrick—Engineering Manager
Bob Forgie—Business Development—Apprenticeship Jan Illian—Project Manager
Stan Burns—Inspector Allen Quynn—Water Maintenance
KBA Team FCCC
Kristen Betty—Project Support Joe Coluccio—Project Manager
R. Scott Clemons—Office Engineer Don Bergman—Project Manager
Shoji Oiye—Project Controls (Vanir) Heather Meeds— Safety Coordinator
Troy Pyles—Project Support (Vanir) PSE
Alecia Cline—Document Controls (Vanir) Jeff McMeekin—Planner
Kim Staheli Louch—Tunneling Consultant(Bennett-Staheli Eng) Joe Jainga—Planner
TT/KC M AT&T
Bill Cranston—Design Project Manager Art Netters—Project Manager
HWA GeoSciences
Erik Anderson—Geo-Technical Engineer
Proiect Schedule—Don Bergman
• Don Bergman of FCCC first stated that they would like to make a request to extend the NTP
date to January 2, 2002. He stated there is a concern by the local residents and the City of
Renton regarding starting the construction during the Holiday Season. The NTP date was a
surprise and FCCC felt that an agreement could be reached that would be acceptable to the
Contractor and the County. This would promote a spirit of cooperation to start this project.
• Don passed out a DRAFT construction schedule. Handout `B" (Included with this Packet).
• Don reviewed his draft construction schedule that had a start date of Jan. 2, 2002 and showed
one month of float at the end of the job. He stated on several occasions that the constraints
that were placed in the contract were going to make the job difficult to complete in the given
widows of time for the various stages of work. He highlighted the street closure requirements
of 8 months for the Intermediate Access Shaft and the 4 and 5 month street closures for the
Bifurcation and Junction Structures.
Preconstruction Conference Meeting Minutes—Page 1 of 4
• Don stated that he would like to take the time from now until the NTP, if it is extended to
after the holidays, to get submittals in and approved. He placed emphasis on the amount of
time that was needed to get submittals approved.
• Don was asked about the possibility of completing the potholing before the holidays. He
responded that it would be difficult to get the traffic control permits from the City of Renton.
The potholing operation will cause a mess and an inconvenience to the local residence.
• Kayren Kittrick from the City of Renton stated that she was not concerned with the disruption
that the potholing operation would create with the local residents.
• Don reminded her that the potholing required deep excavations.
Coordination and Communication—Scott Clemons
• Communication: all correspondence is to be addressed to Glen Hiraki and sent to the ESI field
office (Address is shown on the initial handout from Glen Hiraki).
• Project Hours: the constraints to the work hours are stated in the contract and it is important
that these constraints are adhered.
• Traffic: traffic control plans must be approved by the City of Renton as well as the
coordination of street closures.
• Permits: the CMC will continually be reviewing the conditions of the various permits and
verify that they are being adhered to.
• Inspection and Testing: the CMC will be coordinating all of the inspection and testing of the
work. We will have onsite inspection at all times as well as scheduling of the testing lab for
concrete and soils, etc.
• Project Phases—There will be several phases of the work: potholing, utility relocations, shaft
excavation, tunneling, surface utilities and restoration. The CMC team will coordinate
meetings for each phase to review the operation and review concerns by all agencies.
Community Relations—EnviroIssues Kathy Albert
• Kathy handed out and discussed a packet of flyers that have been distributed to the community,
an outline of the public outreach intended during construction and a list of specific concerns
that local residents have. Handout"C" (available upon request).
• Kayren stated that local residences are the most concerned about parking.
• She also stated there is a large amount of concern regarding settlement of the homes in the
area.
• Erik Hansen from HWA stated that they have done extensive photographing of the roads,
sidewalks near the project. Most to the homes received photo documentation of the existing
conditions both inside and out.
• Kathy and Devon stated have been working on this project since 1998 working closely with
businesses and residents. They have informed the local residence that construction will start
next year.
• David Dittmar of King County stated that Public Relations was to be a topic that will be
discussed every week at the weekly at the project coordination meeting.
Construction Issues—.Bill Cranston
• Bill passed out two drawings G1 and P2 that were for information purposes only. These
drawings were from the construction of the first interceptor that is now being replaced. They
show where shoring and piles might have been and the repair of the invert. See Handout "D"
(available upon request).
• Bill stated that there is a large concern regarding the existing interceptor. It is the only way the
sewage can be sent to the plant. There is no alternate route and there are no valves or gates
that can be used to shut off the flow.
• Bill also passed out and discussed a detailed list of Design and Construction Issues. See
Handout"E"(available upon request).
• Rod Boyd stated that the insurance agreement with the BNSF railroad was still being
negotiated. He would contact FCCC and confirm the final decision.
Preconstruction Conference Meeting Minutes—Page 2 of 4
• Kayren from City of Renton submitted a document that highlights pertinent information for the
City of Renton. See Handout"F"(available upon request).
Closing Comments—all
• Bill Williams of King County stated that he is concerned that if the contract slips that FCCC
will be making the tie-in to the existing interceptor during the high flow season.
• Rod Boyd King County stated that it is imperative that the specific conditions of each permit
be adhered to. Please review them carefully. For example, the flow in the existing interceptor
could be forced out of any upstream structures including tie-in structures being constructed
under this contract, should the power in the plant go down.
• Joe Jainga from PSE stated that they have an existing wrought iron gas line that will need to be
removed in order to relocate the line around the shaft. They will not be able to make a simple
relocation around the structure the complete line will need to be replaced. He will know more
when he sees the shoring drawings.
Break
• King County, FCCC,and the CMC team remained after the break.
Site Safety—Wyatt Wood
• Wyatt gave FCCC an example draft of the submittal he is expecting to receive under contract
specification 01063. See Handout"G". Which describes the submission of the FCCC
company safety plan and a site-specific safety plan.
Apprenticeship—Bob Forgie
• Bob informed FCCC that they would need to keep records of their apprenticeship utilization
and report it to King County when submitting their pay request. FCCC may submit it
electronically because signatures are not required. A copy should go to Bob and one copy to
go to Scott Clemons for verification of contract compliance.
• Bob also stated that they were to submit an Apprentice Utilization Plan one week prior to the
Pre-Con. This was not done.
Contract Administration—Scott Clemons
• Submittals and RFI's are to be addressed to Glen Hiraki, but all should be submitted to the
field office. From there they will be distributed to the appropriate parties. The CMC will
track the submittals to expedite their approval.
• Materials sampling and testing will be handled through the CMC Team. The testing lab under
contract is Otto Rossenau and Associates.
• CMC will monitor the permit requirements to verify contractor compliance. CMC will utilize
the contractor's updated schedule to keep City of Renton, King County and other parties
current with the project progress.
• CMC Inspectors on this project are Stan Burns and Kim Staheli Louch.
• Record Drawings will be reviewed on a monthly basis as a part of monthly approval of the
application for payment.
Contract Administration—Shoji Oiye
• Shoji handed out a letter on behalf of Christi Sanders-Meena that highlights 14 points that will
assist in the administration of this contract. It also included the Submittal, Substitution
Request, Certification of wages paid by the contractor, and Certification of payment to
subcontractors and suppliers forms. See Handout"H" (available upon request).
• Shoji asked how the contractor or their sub would be updating the master schedule. FCCC will
be using"Suretrak Software". Shoji requested it weekly.
Preconstruction Conference Meeting Minutes—Page 3 of 4
• Shoji asked how FCCC would be handling the retainage. FCCC has obtained a bond. Shoji
reminded them that if a change orders increases, the contract amount for then the retainage
bond would need to be increased also.
• Schedules of Values and project schedule are required within 14 days after NTP.
• Taxes on this project are 8.8%
• Monthly Payments need to include: Monthly Narrative, Statement of Intent to Pay Prevailing
Wages (from both the prime and subs), and an updated construction schedule. The final
payment should contain a final affidavit of amounts paid.
• Change Orders need to be accompanied by the appropriate back up paper work.
• Retainage will not be released until all affidavits have been submitted, all claims are resolved
and release letters from the State of Washington (Dept L&I, Depart of revenue, and Employ
Sec) have been received.
Meetings—Scott Clemons
• Weekly Progress meetings, preferably Thursdays, will be held at the field office once
construction starts.
• King County asked if they could attend FCCC's weekly safety meetings. FCCC agreed.
• Pre-Activity Meetings—King County will be scheduling separate meetings to discuss the
major phases of work and will invite other parties (i.e., City of Renton)that may be directly
effected by that phase of work.
Closing Comments
• Troy Pyles asked FCCC if they would be open to a type of NTP that stated submittal
requirements and other items that could be worked on prior to construction commencing.
• Scott asked FCCC whom the Superintendent was scheduled to be. FCCC stated that it would
most likely vary depending on the type of work being done at the time and who on their
available staff was available at the time. Most likely Jim Burke or Greg Hines.
• Kim asked FCCC whom they had planned for the tunnel operator; they stated most likely Greg
Gaines.
Preconstruction Conference Meeting Minutes—Page 4 of 4
EASTSIDE INTERCEPTOR PROJECT
C03070C
Preconstruction Conference
Handout B
FCCC Project Preliminary Construction Schedule
November December Januay February March Aril Me
ID Task Name Durati Start Finish 1115 1/1 1/1 1/2 12/3 2/1 2/1 2/2 2/3 117 1/141/211/28 2/4 11 182/25 3/4 13111 18 5 4/1 4/8 15 5/6 1
1 submit safety,traffic,sched 30d Thu 11/22/01 Wed 1/2/02
submit safety,traffic,sch
2 NTP Od Wed 1/2/02 Wed 1/2/02 NTP
AO
3 mob 22d Wed 1/2/02 Thu 1/31/02
mob
4 pothole utilities 15d Mon V7102 Fri 1/25/02
pothole uti
5 utility relocates at shafts 200d Mon 128/02 Fri 11/1/02
utilit relocates at shafts
6 tunnel shoring drwgs submittal Od Fri 2/8/02 Fri 2/8/02
tunnel shoring drwgs submittal
7 return shoring submittal Od Fri 3rM02 Fri 322/02
return shoring submittal 3/22
8 order time for shoring steel 22d Mon 325/02 Tue 423/02
order ime for
9 build interm access shaft 22d. Wed 424/02 Thu 523/02
10 build rec shaft(bifurcation) 20d Fri 524/02 Thu 620/02
11 tunnel 1 20d Fri 621102 Thu 7/18/02
12 build rec shaft at 7th/Morris 22d Fri 621/02 Mon 722/02
build re
13 tunnel 2 33d Tue 723/02 Thu 9/5102
14 backfill/rest inter shaft 10d Fri 9/6102 Thu 9/19/02 '
DRAFT ONLY
15 perm utilities/rerstoration 100d Fri 9/6102 Thu 123/03
16 build bifurcation struct 34d Fri 726/02 Wed 9/11/02
17 backfilitrestore bifurca struct 10d Thu 9/12/02 Wed 925/02
18 build junction struct 40d Fri 9/13102 Thu 11f7/02
19 backfililrestore junct strut 10d Fri 11/8/02 Thu 1121/02
20 punch list/demob 5d Fri 124/03 Thu 1/30/03
21 412 days after NTP Od Mon 2/17/03 Mon 2/17/03
Task Summary Roiled Up Progress
Project:eastside interceptor blank Progress project:
Date:Wed 11l7/01 og Rolled Up Task
Milestone Roped Up Milestone 0 Date:A
Page 1
t
M June Ju Au ust Se tember October�O/2
November .
5/6 13 SJ27 6/3 10 17 4 7/1 7/8 /15 /22 /29 8/5 12 /19 9/2 9/9 9/16 /23 /3010/7 0/1 01/4 ua
1/1 1/1 1/2 12/2 2/9 2/1�2/2 2/3 1/61/131/201/27 2/3 eb Oa 17 4 f
DRAFT ONLY
►rder ime for shoring steel
build Interm access shaft
build rec shaft(bifurcation)
unnel 1
build rec shaft at 7th/Morris
nnel 2
backfilllrest inter shaft
pe utilities/rerstoration
build bifurcation struct
backflll/restore bifurca struct
build junction struct
backfiWrestore junct strut
punch IisUdemob
412 days after NTP om
Task Summary Rolled Up Progress
Project:eastside interceptor blank
Date:Wed 11f7/01 Progress Rolled Up Task
Milestone ♦ Rolled Up Milestone 0
Page 2
T � 1m,
e"R LEI
HWAGEOSCIENCES INC.
19730-64TH AVE_ W., SUITE 200
September 22 2000 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036-5957
TEL. 425-774-0106
HWA Project No. 98148-550 FAX.425-774-2714
E-MAIL hwa@hongwest.com
Tetra Tech/KCM Inc.
1917 First Avenue IBIS PROS.#:
Seattle, Washington 98101-1027 Sub#-
Index #:
Index #:
Attention: Mr. William Cranston, P.E. Index P
LOG #;
Subject: GROUND WATER QUALITY DATA ANALYSIS ROUTE TO:
East Side Interceptor(ESI) Section 1
Capacity Upgrade Project
Renton,Washington
Dear Mr. Cranston:
As currently envisioned, ground water in the vicinity of planned excavations for
jacking/receiving pits for the ESI Section 1 Capacity Restoration Project will be
dewatered and disposed of in the King County Metro sanitary sewer system under permit.
To ensure the groundwater does not contain contaminants that might exceed the sanitary
sewer discharge limits, ground water samples were collected and analyzed for total
metals,petroleum hydrocarbons, and volatile organic compounds. This report is a
summary of the water quality data obtained for the ground water samples which are
intended to be representative of the water that will be disposed of during the dewatering
activity.
On September 5`b and 6t'2000,three sets of groundwater samples were collected from
monitoring wells BH-1, BH-7, and BH-11, located in the areas scheduled for excavation.
The locations of these monitoring wells are indicated on the attached Site and
Exploration Plan. The samples were packaged and delivered to OnSite Environmental,
Inc., of Redmond, Washington for water quality testing. The purpose of these tests was
to analytically screen the samples for the analytes listed above.
The following tables list the anal es and contaminant levels for an
y y compound detected
above its practical quanitation level (PQL). Also listed are the King County Metro sewer
discharge standards for comparison. The complete analytical laboratory test results are
appended to this report.
GEOLOGY
GEOENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
HYDROGEOLOGY
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
TESTING & INSPECTION
September 22,2000
P
HWA Project No.98148-550
DATA
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE BH-1
(Intersection of Houser and Morris)
ANALYTE TEST RESULT KING COUNTY METRO
DISCHARGE LIMIT 1 °�`�
Acetone 5.6 None
Chromium 11
2,750
Y^
Copper 15 3,000
Lead 16 2,000
All values reported in µiter. =
PPS
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE BH-7
(Intersection of Morris and South 7t6)
ANALYTE TEST RESULT KING COUNTY METRO
DISCHARGE LUMT
Acetone 5.6 None
(cis)1,2-Dichloroethene 0.29 None
Chloroform 1.6 None
Bromodichloromethane 1.12 None
Tetrachloroethene 1.7 None
Dibromochloromethane 0.86 None
All values reported in µg/liter.
ESI Water Quality Letdoc.dot 2 HWA GEoSCtENCES INC.
September 22,2000
HWA Project No.98148-550
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE BH-11
(Intersection of Houser and Burnett)
ANALYTE TEST RESULT KING COUNTY METRO
DISCHARGE LIMIT
Carbon Disulfide 0.52 None
Chromium 130 2,750
Copper 54 3,000
Lead 30 2,000
Nickel 110 2,500
Zinc 370 5,000
All values reported in µg/liter.
RESULTS
The ground water sample collected from BH-7 showed low-level hits for six organic
compounds although the concentrations were well below regulated levels.
Tetrachloroethene was detected at about one third of the MTCA Method A MCL, but this
should not be an issue for sanitary sewer discharge.
Samples collected from BH-1 and BH-11 revealed low levels of total metals at one to two
orders of magnitude below the sanitary sewer discharge limits. Although the metals
concentrations were well below the Metro discharge standards, it was observed during
sampling that the water was turbid which may account for the higher levels than would
otherwise be expected. The water produced during dewatering is not anticipated to
contain the sediment load associated with the test samples and therefore should contain a
lower concentration of total metals.
All laboratory QA/QC results for this data set were within EPA criteria and no flags were
assigned to any of the results reported.
ESI Water Quality Let.doc.dot 3 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
September 22,2000
HWA Project No.98148-550
CONCLUSION
The analytical test results for the three samples collected indicate that all parameters are
well within the King County discharge limits set for sanitary sewer discharge. It is
anticipated that the construction dewatering wells will produce water that is less turbid
than the samples reported above, resulting in even lower or non-detectable levels of total
metals.
ADDITIONAL DEWATERING CONSIDERATIONS
We anticipate that each pit will likely have 1 or 2 dewatering wells installed to keep the
excavation bottoms dewatered. No more than two pits are likely to be in operation at any
given time. The dewatering discharge from each pit is likely to be 25,000 gallons per day
(gpd), however it could be twice or even three times this amount. The jacking pit at
Houser and Morris(BH-1) will likely be in use for 4 to 6 months. The two receiving pits
(BH-7 and BH-11) will likely be open for t/Z this time.
In addition, sumps and pumps will likely be used to collect surface water and leakage
through the pit walls that collects in the pit bottoms. We expect this leakage to be less
than 25,000 gpd; however, this water will likely be relatively turbid. We anticipate the
sump/pump water will be cleaned by settling or filtering.
O.O
Sincerely, .y4�oZ V'''�►i,���
h G
HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
�naES 7/25✓ 01 c�
John Macpherson Ralph N. Boirum, P.E.
Senior Water Quality Specialist Vice President
JM:RNB:jm/eoa
Attachments: Figure 1 — Site and Exploration Plan
OnSite Environmental, Inc.,Analytical Data Report
ESI Water Quality L.etdoc.dot 4 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
F T r
11 I n;ilii
�1 4i -
t
1 I—
I
lI!
�i ... L.._.-.
1 � �
IL
I I 1
TH-S+-
i s t
(niN
I
r__.._..
1 1 1 I >
Q I _. W I
-
_.J I..-
Ip I I NI I —
7 ._._.. •• _jA 1 I I I 1 -
i4-.._.._.._..-1
8H-2 _- ---__
T i -../
1i
II1I maWZ'IlI
- I
I
I
_
_-
_
SCALE 1 150
LEGEND
6TH tjjI
}-
BH-1 BORING DESIGNATION AND
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
I I I I 1 1 I I I I •� I I r /
ME81-1 DESIGNATION AND APPROXIMATE
LOCATION OF PREVIOUS BORING
r 1 3+� i -"- (METROPOLITAN ENGINEERS, 1961
l i i i 13H-3 CROSS SECTION
I I I 1
I 1 1 I I 11 11 1
PROPOSED GRAVITY LINE
I 1 1 1 1 Z+k O
7/
1+i
I I i I I I I 1 1 Ib I
p]{ " ESI SECTION 1 " " HC_
i ! I I I I I •- Il i l l 1 I I
u ' ' CAPACITY RESTORATION =•�o �a`-' `----- J L____J L_J.__J _ _T -- , PROJECT EXPLORATION PLAN
REFERENCE: Bose mo rovided D KCM Ina �- BH-7 �- HWAGEOSQENCES INC. RENTON,WASHINGTON 6.27.00 98148
G11P iRmE.N 41YS�a07lIYlUBOOI.pwe
`pa e 1
[Allen Quynn - ESI Groundwater Discharge 9
From: "Cranston, William A." <wcranston@KCMINC.com>
To: <aquynn@ci.renton.wa.us>
Date: 12/6/00 2:33PM
Subject: ESI Groundwater Discharge
Alan:
Following up on our conversation last week, I looked into the surface water
discharge standards, and discussed further the situation with both King
County and our geotechnical consultant.
The geotechnical consultant noted that the groundwater samples taken for
testing were turbid samples, while the groundwater discharge wells, once
developed, will yield clear discharges. They pointed out that the turbid
samples could be expected to give higher metals readings than clear samples.
While our samples were adequate for testing for discharge to the King Co.
system (where allowable discharge levels are much higher than for surface
water discharge), they would yield a prediction of metals levels that were
higher than would come from a developed well at the same point. Thus, the
test results we forwarded to you do not accurately characterize the
anticipated flows for the groundwater wells in the three access shafts once
the wells are developed.
In discussion with King Co., they have made clear that, should approval be
given to discharge to the Renton storm water system, the discharges will
meet the discharge limitation contained in State regulations. This
compliance will be monitored at intervals during construction. Flows that
do not meet the discharge limitations will be disposed of by alternative
means.
Please feel free to call me if you should have any questions.
--Bill--
------e-mail: wcranston@kcminc.com
------Phone: (206)443-2540
------Fax: (206)443-5372
CC: "Dittmar, Dave" <david.dittmar@metrokc.gov>, "Boyd, Rod" <rod.boyd@metrokc.gov>,
"Ball, Bruce" <BBall@KCMINC.com>
TETRA TECH/KCM, INC.
1917 First Avenue, Seattle,WA 98101-1027
(206) 443-5300 • FAX (206) 443-5372
April 18, 2001
Mr. David Dittmar
King County, Wastewater Treatment Division
201 South Jackson Street, M.S. KSC-NR-0507
Seattle, Washington 98104-3855
Subject: Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration Project
Contract No. E83010E
Final Review Contract Documents
Dear Dave:
Enclosed are five sets of Volumes 2 and 3 of the contract documents for the Eastside
Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration project for final review. The review
comments have been incorporated, and the list of comments and their disposition is
being assembled now. It will be forwarded within a day. One set of the documents,
along with a full-sized set of the utility drawings, is being forwarded to Dave Chris-
tensen.
As noted, Volume 1 (Division 0) is not included, since a revised set of Division 0
documents was not received. Please refer to the 90% documents for the Division 0
sections.
In these documents, all previous tracked changes have been accepted, and the
changes made since the 90% documents are tracked and marked.
Particular attention is directed to the following:
• Those sections related to City of Renton work have been extensively rewritten,
and now based upon the 1997 Renton and 1996 WSDOT specifications. The re-
vised sections are 02500 (Paving Restoration), 02580 (Pavement Marking),
02610 (Gravity Sanitary Sewers), 02666 (Potable Water System), and 02720
(Storm Drainage System). Please ask Glen Hiraki and Christy Sanders-Meena
review these sections carefully, along with the attached referenced sections from
the Renton and WSDOT specifications, to make sure that they are suitably writ-
ten for their use.
• Section 01014 has a number of rewritten provisions. One of these, related to the
flows in the existing interceptor, needs further revision related to the use of
King County equipment by the contractor, as we have discussed.
Mr. David Dittmar
April 18, 2001
Page 2
• The final permit documents for the BNSF Temporary Occupancy Permit were
not received in time for inclusion in this draft. I have them, and they will be in-
serted in the final documents. The BNSF permit for the water line crossing has
not yet been received. If it is not received in time, the appropriate portion of
Section 01062 will be revised as necessary.
• Section 01520, Project Representative Field Office, has been deleted, as re-
quested by Christy Sanders-Meena. Glen Hiraki and the inspection staff will be
headquartered at the East Plant. The paragraph in Section 01062 (1.03.A) that
noted the permit requirements for this temporary building has been deleted.
• The Geotechnical Report has been deleted from the contract documents.
Obviously, as the review of the proposed street closures and detours by the Renton
City Council proceeds, revisions may become necessary to some of the documents.
These will be taken care of in the final documents.
Please call me if there are any questions.
Sincerely,
TETRA TECHIKCM, INC.
17 ff4u
William A. Cranston, P.E.
Project Manager
c--!) 'Christensen
Attachments
#2830046-207
TETRA TECH/KCM, INC.
1917 First Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101-1027
(206)443-5300 • FAX(206) 443-5372
Ivl ti 1 ���GY
51 6W_
April 18, 2001
Mr. David Dittmar
King County, Wastewater Treatment Division
201 South Jackson Street, M.S. KSC-NR-0507
Seattle, Washington 98104-3855
Subject: Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration Project
Contract No. E83010E
Final Review Contract Documents
Dear Dave:
Enclosed are five sets of Volumes 2 and 3 of the contract documents for the Eastside
Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration project for final review. The review
comments have been incorporated, and the list of comments and their disposition is
being assembled now. It will be forwarded within a day. One set of the documents,
along with a full-sized set of the utility drawings, is being forwarded to Dave Chris-
tensen.
As noted, Volume 1 (Division 0) is not included, since a revised set of Division 0
documents was not received. Please refer to the 90% documents for the Division 0
sections.
In these documents, all previous tracked changes have been accepted, and the
changes made since the 90% documents are tracked and marked.
Particular attention is directed to the following:
• Those sections related to City of Renton work have been extensively rewritten,
and now based upon the 1997 Renton and 1996 WSDOT specifications. The re-
vised sections are 02500 (Paving Restoration), 02580 (Pavement Marking),
02610 (Gravity Sanitary Sewers), 02666 (Potable Water System), and 02720
(Storm Drainage System). Please ask Glen Hiraki and Christy Sanders-Meena
review these sections carefully, along with the attached referenced sections from
the Renton and WSDOT specifications, to make sure that they are suitably writ-
ten for their use.
• Section 01014 has a number of rewritten provisions. One of these, related to the
flows in the existing interceptor, needs further revision related to the use of
King County equipment by the contractor, as we have discussed.
Mr. David Dittmar
April 18, 2001
Page 2
• The final permit documents for the BNSF Temporary Occupancy Permit were
not received in time for inclusion in this draft. I have them, and they will be in-
serted in the final documents. The BNSF permit for the water line crossing has
not yet been received. If it is not received in time, the appropriate portion of
Section 01062 will be revised as necessary.
• Section 01520, Project Representative Field Office, has been deleted, as re-
quested by Christy Sanders-Meena. Glen Hiraki and the inspection staff will be
headquartered at the East Plant. The paragraph in Section 01062 (1.03.A) that
noted the permit requirements for this temporary building has been deleted.
• The Geotechnical Report has been deleted from the contract documents.
Obviously, as the review of the proposed street closures and detours by the Renton
City Council proceeds, revisions may become necessary to some of the documents.
These will be taken care of in the final documents.
Please call me if there are any questions.
Sincerely,
TE RA TECHIKCM, INC.
William A. Cranston, P.E.
Project Manager
c Dave Christensen
Attachments
#2830046-207
f
King County
Department of Natural Resources
Industrial Waste Program
130 Nickerson Street,Suite 200
Seattle,WA 98109-1658
(206)263-3000
(206)263-3001 FAX
December 7, 2000 RECEIVE
CERTIFIED MAIL DEC 1 1 2000
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
CITY OF RENTON
Rod Boyd OTLITY SYSTEMS
Real Estate Agent
King County
201 South Jackson Street, Suite 600
Seattle, Washington 98102-3855
Issuance of Wastewater Discharge Authorization No. 673-01 to King County CIP for the Eastside
Interceptor Rehabilitation Project
Dear Mr. Boyd:
The King County Industrial Waste Program has reviewed your application to discharge industrial
wastewater to the sewer system from the King County CIP -Eastside Interceptor construction project
located at Houser Way South& Burnett Avenue South in Renton and has issued the enclosed Major
Discharge Authorization.
This authorization permits you to discharge limited amounts of industrial wastewater into King
County's sewer system in accordance with the effluent limitations and other requirements and
conditions set forth in the document and the regulations outlined in King County Code 28.84.060
(enclosed). The formal requirements and fees of a full wastewater permit will not be required as long
as you maintain good compliance and do not change the nature and volume of your discharge.
If you propose to increase the volume of your discharge or change the type or quantities of substances
discharged, you must contact King County at least 60 days before making these changes.
If at any time you have questions about this discharge authorization, or other questions about your
discharge, please feel free to call me at (206) 263-3012.
Sincerely,
5-i2L
Arnaud Girard
Investigator
Industrial Waste Program
Enclosures
cc: David Christensen, City of Renton
Doug Hilderbrand, King County
dakccipesi.dac
King County
Wastewater Treatment Division
Department of Natural Resources
King Street Center
201 South Jackson Street
Seattle,WA 98104-3856 RECEIVED
November 20, 2000 NOV 2 i 2000
CITY OF RENTON
UTILITY SYSTEMS
Mr. Alan Quynn, Project Manager
Renton Surface Water Utility
1055 S Grady Way
Renton, WA 98029
Eastside Interceptor Section 1
Capacity Restoration Project
Groundwater Discharge
Dear Mr. Quynn:
Following up on your discussion with Bill Cranston of Tetra Tech/KCM, I am requesting
that the City of Renton Surface Water Utility, grant permission to King County for
discharge of clean groundwater into the storm water system.
The groundwater discharge is the result of construction of three shafts that will provide
access to a tunnel being constructed to bypass a damaged portion of King County's
Eastside Interceptor. This 1800-foot long tunnel bypass will be constructed in the area
immediately south of the Burlington Northern Sante Fe Railroad and west of Burnett
Avenue S. Each of the three access shafts will be approximately 30 feet deep, and will
penetrate up to 25 feet below the water table in the area. The attached Drawing G3 shows
the proposed bypass and the access shaft locations.
The specifics of the discharge request are as follows:
Purpose: To dispose of clean groundwater generated in the construction of three
tunnel access shafts.
Discharge Points: Near the intersections of Burnett Avenue S/Houser Way S, Houser
Way S/Morris Avenue S, and Morris Avenue S/S 7"' Street.
Quantities: Estimated at up to 57,600 gallons per day per access shaft, with up to,
three shafts open at one time (for a total of 172,800 gallons per day).
Water Quality: Water quality well within state standards for discharge. A copy of the
water quality test program results is attached.
Schedule: Construction of the access shafts is expected to begin by August 2000,
and to be completed by April 2002.
CLEAN WATER —A SOUND INVESTMENT
Mr. Alan Quynn
November 20, 2000
Page 2
Contractor: To be.determined. The bid process will commence in March 2000.
If you have questions, please call me t (206) 684-1813 or Bill Cranston at (206)443-
2540.
nce ely,
David Dittmar, P.E.
Conveyance Program Manager
DD/lm
Attachments
cc: Bill Cranston,Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc.
Rt & — t C)V c Short Plat (SHPL# )
Prelim.Plat (PP#
REQUEST FOR PROJECT# )
CAG# )
To: Technical Services Date p WO# c S 3 ` C-' Green#
From: Plan Review/Project Manager
Project Name —` GS A c� T✓t fi-erc(,2k1 a ar�i S Y h�► Z►Sri�ti c�r� arc fti
�1,�
J1 (70c max)Description of Project: T h 5f „ 5+G� �� vl l-f 4'V yt'S "4Vr K1 i?�f,�J�i i��1W-5
V GI L1 C('Yt L S(,J 7 J
Circle Size of Waterline: 8" 10" 12" Circle One: New or Extension
Circle Size of Sewerline: 8" 10" 12" Circle One: New or Extension
Circle Size of Stormline: 12" 15" 18" Nit Circle One: New or Extension
Address or Street Name(s) Oofn'5 Ve S �E'�vt��ti �jvuS�+ GJra,S. 4�z� S G) 7 14� Sy'.
Dvlpr/Contractor/Owner/Cnslt::
(70 characters max)
Check each discipline involved in Project Ltr Drwg #of sheets per discipline
✓ ✓
❑ Trans-Storm ❑ ❑
(Roadway/Drainage) (Off site improvements)(include basin name) (include TESC sheets)
❑ Transportation (Signalization,Channelization,Lighting) Cl ❑
❑ Wastewater ❑ ❑
Sanitary Sewer Main(include basin name)
❑ Water (Mains,Valves,Hydrants) ❑ ❑
(Include composite&Horizontal Chi Sheets)
Suface Water ❑ ❑
Improvements ( IP ONLY)(include basin name)
TS Use Only
7 tat
Approved by TSM Date:
H:forms/utility/92-090.DOC/CD/bh
CIP FILE OUTLINE
1000 CORRESPONDENCE
General Correspondence
Consultant Correspondence
1003 City Correspondence
1004 Other Agencies Correspondence
<1:66S= Contractor Correspondence
1006 Grants/Loans -Correspondence
1100 DESIGN/PLANNING
1101 Design
1102 Consultant Selection
1103 Contracts
1104 Reports/Studies/Calculations
1105 Consultant Payments
1200 AGREEMENTS
1300 SEPA
1400 PERMITS/PLAN REVIEW
1500 EASEMENTS/DEEDS
1600 CONSTRUCTION
<IW' Construction Bid Information ,o /
1602 Construction Contract Irtsurance & Legal Review �''` CA 5 Gl f(
Ono Construction Contract Document J
Construction Submittals
4 z
hop Drawings
Sche
Traffic Control Plan
1 0 Construction Pay Estimates
Prevailing Wages
Construction Change Orders
1607 Construction Inspection/Progress Reports
Photos, Site Condition Reports
1609 Construction Management Services(Consultant)
Contract
Invoices
1610 Operations&Maintenance
General Information
Manual
As-Built/Survey Notes
1700 LITIGATION
1800 LID
1801 LID Public Notification
1802 LID Public Meetings
1803 LID Final Assessment Roll
1804 LID Miscellaneous
1900 SAD
1901 SAD Public Notification
1902 SAD Public Meetings
1903 SAD Final Assessment Roll
1904 SAD Miscellaneous
H/DIV/UTIL/FI LEOTLA.DOC\If
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al#:
For Agenda of: February 26, 2001
Dept/DivBoard.. Planning/Building/Public Works
Staff contact...... Dave Christensen X-7212 Agenda Status
Consent.............. X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Memorandum of Agreement By and Between the City of Correspondence..
Ordinance.............
Renton and King County for the ESI Section I Capacity Resolution............
Restoration Agreement Old Business........
Exhibits: New Business.......
Memorandum of Agreement Study Sessions......
Information.........
City Attorney Approval
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Refer to Utilities Committee - March 1, 2001 Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept......
Other...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted.......... Revenue Generated......... $500,000
Total Project Budget -0_ City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The King County Wastewater Treatment Division needs to construct an additional facility to restore
capacity lost within the existing Eastside Interceptor located in the vicinity of Burnett Avenue South
and South 7' Street. The County is proposing a supplemental pipeline be constructed in Houser Way
South and Morris Avenue South to restore the lost capacity. As part of this work, the City and County
have developed a Memorandum of Agreement to establish the criterion by which the project will meet
its overall objectives, including permitting issues, mitigation, and coordinated project work for the City
by the County.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Administration that the City Council approve the Memorandum
of Agreement By and Between the City and King County for the ESI Section I Capacity
Restoration Project and that the Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the
agreement.
H:DIV/UTIL/WW/DAV EC/MOA-AB/DMC:lf
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 20, 2001
TO: Dan Clawson, President
City Council Members
VIA: �C�Mayor Jesse Tanner
(0-Z
FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT: Dave Christensen x-7212
SUBJECT: Memorandum of Agreement By and Between the City of Renton and
King County for the ESI Section I Capacity Restoration Agreement
ISSUE:
The King County Wastewater Treatment Division needs to construct an additional facility to restore
capacity lost within the existing Eastside Interceptor located in the vicinity of Burnett Avenue South
and South 7" Street. The County is proposing a supplemental pipeline be constructed in Houser Way
South and Morris Avenue South to restore the lost capacity. As part of this work, the City and
County have developed a Memorandum of Agreement to establish the criterion by which the project
will meet its overall objectives, including permitting issues, mitigation, and coordinated project work
for the City by the County.
RECOMMENDATION:
• It is Staff's recommendation that the City Council approve the Memorandum of Agreement By
and Between the City and King County for the ESI Section I Capacity Restoration Project and that
the Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
In the early days of the initial formation of what was Metro (1963-64) and is now King County
Wastewater Treatment Division. Metro constructed its Eastside Interceptor Section I. In 1965, the
Seattle area experienced a significant eanhquake that caused a section of the new interceptor to lift-up
approximately 3-feet. This condition resulted in significant deposits of solid materials collecting
behind this up-lifted section. To resolve this problem, Metro installed a concrete paved invert
approximately 3,000 feet in length to overcome the lost slope. The result of this action was that the
capacity of this facility was reduced from its original design of 224 million gallons per day (mod) to
approximately 173 mgd. This lost capacity was not critical in 1965 and has not been a significant
issue until this current time as flows from the service area are more closely meeting or exceeding the
current reduced capacity.
February 20, 2001
Page 2
King County anticipates that the current facility will be at capacity by 2003. With this in mind, the
County conducted a pre-design effort to evaluate various options to restore the lost capacity in the
interceptor. Options ranged from replacement in-line of the existing facility, major re-routes of
greater than 7,000-feet in length, and pumping alternatives. As the pre-design effort progressed, an
option that minimized the routing of an additional facility was determined. This alternative ultimately
has become the route they intend to construct. This route minimizes impacts to the downtown area,
while restoring the actual lost capacity that resulted from the 1965 earthquake. In-line options proved
to be far more complex than anticipated, specifically in trying to determine ways to temporarily
bypass flows in the existing interceptor. Alternatives that included full re-routing of the facility
resulted in far greater impacts, especially to portions of Downtown in the process of redevelopment.
With an alternative selected, the County and the City worked to put together a project that best met
each of our needs. The result of this team effort is included within the Memorandum of Agreement.
This agreement covers all issues related to the project including permitting, project scope,joint
project work, and mitigation. The City agreed to expedite and assist the County in its permitting
effort for the project. The City and County have agreed to include City water and storm
improvements as part of their project in order to minimize the total impact to the neighborhood.
Mitigation measures include payment of$500,000 to the City for its use on capital improvements, as
well as installation of a water main crossing at Houser Way South and South Morris Street. It is
Staff's intent to use the $500,000 mitigation fund to supplement the City's Street Overlay Program,
including some of the roadways currently being disrupted within the South Renton Neighborhoods.
The current schedule for this project is for construction bidding to begin in April of this year.
Construction is expected to begin in June of 2001 and be completed in August of 2002. In order to
minimize construction impacts, the County will install a new 72-inch pipeline by tunneling. This
methodology will allow the County to construct the new facility, but only have three excavation points
along the route to install the pipeline. In addition to the County work, the contractor will also install a
new 12-inch water line and a new 18-inch storm line from South 5`h Street to South 7`I' Street in
Morris Avenue South. By constructing these facilities at the same time as the County's facility, we
minimize the overall impact to this neighborhood.
CONCLUSION:
The County needs to install an additional pipeline in order to facilitate future flows anticipated for its
Eastside Interceptor. The City and the County have negotiated a Memorandum of Agreement that
identifies and addresses key issues associated with this project. As such, Staff recommends that
Council approve the Memorandum of Agreement.
H.D1V/UTIL:W%% 'DAVEC NIOA ISSUErDNIC:It,'
' IN,
CAG-01-108
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RENTON AND
KING COUNTY
SECTION 1. RECITALS
1.1 The City of Renton(the."City") is an optional municipal code city of the State of
Washington. The City has responsibility for, among other things, the regulation of
development through its shoreline, land use, building and other codes, and the
management of its parks, streets and municipal utilities within its jurisdiction.
1.2 King County (the "County") is a political subdivision of the State of Washington and a
"Home Rule" Charter county created pursuant to Article 11, Section 4 of the Washington
Constitution. Pursuant to a public vote, the County assumed the rights, powers and
obligations of the former Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle ("METRO") effective
January 1, 1994. As a result, the County now performs the function of water pollution
abatement pursuant to RCW 35.58.050(1).
1.3 By Resolution No. 23, adopted April 22, 1959 the former METRO Council adopted a
Comprehensive Sewage Disposal Plan for the Seattle-King County Metropolitan area. In
accordance with the authority granted by RCW 35.58.200,this plan as been re-designated
the Comprehensive Water Pollution Abatement Plan. The Comprehensive Water
Pollution Abatement Plan has been supplemented and amended from time to time.
1.4 The County is responsible for constructing and operating all regional wastewater
conveyance facilities in King County.
1.5 In order to restore capacity in the Eastside Interceptor Section 1, the County must
construct a new 72-inch diameter bypass pipeline from the intersection of Burnett
Avenue South and Houser Way South, along Houser Way South to the intersection of
Morris Avenue South, along Moms Avenue South to the intersection of South 71h Street,
all in the City of Renton.
01/31/01 1 MOA January 30, 2001.doc
x
1.6 With the support of County funding,the City wishes to undertake certain mitigation and
neighborhood projects described herein as full and complete mitigation for any adverse
impacts associated with the County's contemplated improvements to the Eastside
Interceptor Section 1.
1.7 The City is willing to design, construct, operate and maintain the mitigation and
neighborhood projects, provided they are funded by the County as set forth herein. In
addition to its funding commitments regarding the City's mitigation and neighborhood
projects,the County is willing to design, construct, operate and maintain an upgraded
Eastside Interceptor Section 1 as set forth herein.
1.8 A second primary purpose of this Agreement is to provide a means for the County and
City to work collaboratively to satisfy all City permitting and approval requirements in
order to expedite the construction of the contemplated improvements to the Eastside
-Interceptor Section 1. In particular, the City agrees to expedite to the fullest degree
possible in complying with all state and local laws including SEPA, the processing of all
City permits and approvals associated with the Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Capacity
Restoration Project.
1.9 Execution of this Agreement has been duly authorized by the the City and the County.
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS
For purposes of this Agreement, the terms underlined below shall have the following
meanings:
2.1 Agreement - this Agreement.
2.2 City - the City of Renton, Washington, a municipal corporation and an optional
municipal code city of the State of Washington.
2.3 Administrator(Ci1y of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator) or his/her-
desi nee-that individual or his/her designated representative(s) responsible for
coordinating and facilitating City personnel,private contractors and consultants, and
financing matters in connection with the City's Mitigation and Neighborhood Projects and
01/31/01 2 MOA January 30, 2001 .doc
for overseeing City land.use and regulatory approval processes related to the County's
Eastside Interceptor Section I Capacity Restoration Project.
2.4 Cily Project Manager-that individual or his/her designated representative(s) appointed
by the Administrator to carry out the specific project-related responsibilities set forth in
this Agreement.
2.5 Compensate or Compensation-the County's activities to design, fund, construct, own,
operate, maintain or manage, or take actions to offset impacts associated with the
Eastside Interceptor Section I Capacity Restoration Project by replacing, enhancing or
providing substitute resources or environments, as allowed under WAC 197-11-768(5)
and which meets the following:
Mitigate or fund mitigation projects related to the direct and indirect impacts of
construction and operation of the Project;
Compensate for unavoidable impacts on residential neighborhoods,private
property and the urban environment associated with the Project;
— Direct mitigation toward actions taken;
— Relate the cost of mitigating measures to the impacts;
Where possible foster coincident benefits with other projects; and
Base mitigation on facility performance and site characteristics.
2.6 Coun - King County, Washington, a political subdivision of the State of Washington
and Home Rule Charter county created pursuant to Article 11, Section 4 of the
Washington Constitution.
2.7 County Project Manager- that individual appointed by the Manager of the Wastewater
Treatment Division, King County Department of Natural Resources to carry out
coordinating responsibilities as set forth in this Agreement.
2.8 Disbursement - any moneys transferred to the City by the County pursuant to this
Agreement.
2.9 Disbursement Date - any date on which the County pays Disbursements to the City.
f
O1/31/O1 3 MOA January 30, 2001.doc
2.10 Implement or Implementation- activities to plan,design, fund, construct, own, operate,
maintain, mitigate or otherwise manage or take action to carry out Mitigation and
Neighborhood Project or the Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project.
2.11 Include or Including-including but not limited to.
2.12 Initial Disbursement- the first Disbursement under this Agreement.
2.13 Initial Disbursement Date -the date of the Initial Disbursement.
2.14 Mitigation and Neighborhood Projects-projects designed and constructed by the City
and financed in whole or part with King County funds under Section 4 of this Agreement.
2.16 Permittiniz, Permit Review, Permit Processing-the procedures or process of analyzing or
deciding upon any license, permit, approval or concurrence by the City with respect to
the System Improvement Projects.
2.17 Project Managers - the City Project Manager and the County Project Manager.
2.18 Project Schedule -the schedule recognized by the City and County for permitting and
constructing the System Improvement Projects.
SECTION 3. PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
3.1 Eastside Interceptor Section I Project Schedule. As set forth in Exhibit A-1,the
County's permitting work for the project began in August 2000 and is scheduled to be
completed by January 2001. The City agrees to use its best efforts to assist the County
in meeting the Project Schedule for the Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project. The SEPA
checklist and determination for this project is attached as Exhibit A-2.
3.2 The City shall in good faith exercise its best efforts, including the use of all legal and
_ practicable means,to facilitate and not hinder the County's ability to begin and complete
construction and implementation of the Eastside Interceptor Section I Project in
accordance with their respective Project Schedules, including the following:
(a) To use its best efforts to expeditiously process all project permits required from
the City to allow timely commencement of site preparation work in accordance
with applicable Project Schedules;
01/31/01 4 MOA January 30, 2001.doc
(b)- Ensuring that City review of all County permit applications is timely completed
and that notices for all public hearings are timely issued;
(c) Devoting staff time and other resources reasonably necessary to process permits
as described in Subsection(b)above;
(d) Supporting the mitigation measures described herein before the public and other
regulatory agencies reviewing and approving the mitigation measures, and not
recommending or seeking additional mitigation or compensation in connection with
_ the Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project;
(e) Acknowledging that the mitigation measures described herein are adequate to
mitigate all environmental impacts associated with the Eastside Interceptor
Section 1 Project and that no additional mitigation is necessary or appropriate;
(f) Assisting.the County in avoiding or defending any appeals of Eastside Interceptor
Section I Project permits or other approvals required for the Project; and
(g) Agreeing not to encourage other individuals or entities to oppose, appeal or
_ otherwise delay the beginning of construction work being scheduled.
3.3 The County will take reasonable steps to secure its necessary permits and approvals,
including, but not limited to, providing adequate preliminary information and studies,
staff,.funding and timely submission of related applications.
SECTION 4. MITIGATION AND COMPENSATION
4.1 General. In order to (a) mitigation of adverse construction and other impacts on the City
of Renton associated with the Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project; and (b)providing
the City with the necessary assets to assist the City in providing the resources to
expeditiously process all necessary City of Renton permits and approvals associated
_ with the Project, the County shall pay Disbursements to the City to support the design
and construction of the Mitigation and Neighborhood Projects in accordance with
Subsections 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.6 below. Payment for the review of land use
applications associated with the County's Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project,
01/31/01 5 MOA January 30, 2001 .doc
including all permit review and processing services provided by the City,shall be paid
pursuant to Title 4 of Renton City Code.
4.2 County Funding in Support of Mitigation and Neighborhood Projects. The County shall
_ fund $500,000 in support of City designed and constructed Mitigation and Neighborhood
Projects in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Such Projects
shall consist primarily of community improvements within the City designed to mitigate
impacts on the City of Renton associated with the County's Eastside Interceptor Section
1 Project. Subject to Subsection 4.6 below,the County shall pay to the City one
Disbursement as follows:
Within 30 days of the City's issuance of permits necessary for the County to
begin construction of the Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project - $500,000.
4.3 City Funding of Storm Sewer and Water Line Work Along Morris Avenue South. The
City shall reimburse the County for associated engineering and construction costs for the
storm sewer and water line work along Morris Avenue South in accordance with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement. Subject to Subsection 4.6 below, the City shall
pay the County the following Disbursements:
All associated engineering costs within 30 days after the Notice to Proceed of
construction of the Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project. These costs shall
include the Design Consultant's costs related to the storm sewer and water line
work during design.
All associated construction costs 30 days after the Substantial Completion of the
_ construction of the Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project. These costs include the
Contractor's costs, Design Consultant's costs and Construction Management
Consultant's costs related to the storm sewer and waterline work during
construction.
4.4 Waterline Extension Work. In order to limit construction impacts to the local
neighborhoods, the County will install a waterline extension under the Burlington
Northern Santa Fe railroad tracks at the intersection of Houser Way South and Morris
01/31/01 6 MOA January 30, 2001 .doc
Avenue South. The County will pay for all design, permitting and construction costs for
_ this work. The City agrees to provide technical support for this portion of work.
4.5 Storm Sewer/Waterline Work Along Morris Avenue.South. In order to limit construction
impacts to the local neighborhoods,the County will install a new 12 inch to 18 inch storm
sewer line along Morris Avenue South from Houser way South to South 71' Street and a
new 12 inch waterline along Morris Avenue South from South 5'h Street to South 7ffi
Street. The City agrees to reimburse the County for all costs associated with engineering
and construction of the new storm sewer and waterline. The City will provide technical
assistance during the design process. King County staff time will not be reimbursed by
the City.
4.6 Conditions of Payment. It shall be a condition precedent to any Disbursement or County
_ expenditure of funds under Subsection 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 above that the County has
received all City permits necessary to proceed with construction (provided that King
County and the City have taken reasonable steps to secure such permits). If the City
permits are appealed, the Disbursement will not occur until all such appeals have been
resolved, allowing construction to begin.
SECTION 5. RESPONSIBILITIES
. 5.1 City Responsibilities. The City shall have full responsibility for the Mitigation and
Neighborhood Project improvements.
(a) The City shall be responsible for the following project related activities in
connection with Mitigation and Neighborhood Projects:
1. Performing all aspects of project design.
2. Obtaining all necessary permits.
3. Performing all aspects of construction.
4. Providing final acceptance of all facilities from the construction contractor.
5. Operating and maintaining all facilities.
01/31/01 7 MOA January 30, 2001.doc
(b) The City shall also provide the County with progress reports according to the
following schedule:
1. Annual progress report.
2. Provide annual reports until all mitigation funds have been expended, but
not to exceed seven years from the date of the Agreement.
_ (c) Ownership of all facilities constructed under this Section shall be with the City; all
_ operation and maintenance responsibilities and costs shall similarly be the
obligation of the City.
(d) The City shall assume all liability for the design, construction, operation and
maintenance of all facilities constructed under this Section.
5.2 County Responsibilities. The County shall:
(a) Submit to the City, all notices from the County of award of a contract for the
construction of the Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project.
(b) The County shall make payment of the mitigation monies to the City on a timely
basis.
(c) The County shall also use its' best efforts to minimize impacts on the City, its'
neighborhoods and citizens, cooperating with the City to resolve problems,
communicating with the City about problems and upcoming events, and providing
adequate budget and funding to see that the project is constructed in a timely and
efficient manner.
SECTION 6. CITY USE OF DISBURSEMENTS
6.1 Conditions of Disbursement. Subject to the conditions established by Subsection 4.2, the
Disbursement to the City shall be conditioned upon compliance by the City with the
terms of this Agreement and the issuance of a Notice to Proceed to a Contractor for
construction and implementation by the County of the Eastside Interceptor Section 1
Project.
X
01/31/01 8 MOA January 30, 2001.doc
6.2 Maximum Disbursement Amount. In no event shall the total amount of Disbursement to
the City pursuant to this Agreement exceed $500,000 for the Mitigation and
Neighborhood Projects. In no event shall the total amount of Disbursement to the
_ County pursuant to this Agreement exceed$46,351 for engineering services and the
construction bid amount plus all change orders, as approved by the City, for the Storm
Sewer and Waterline.
6.3 City Expenditure of Disbursement. The City shall deposit, invest and expend all monies
received from the County pursuant to this Agreement consistent with the terms of this
Agreement. Subject to Subsection 6.4,the City agrees to the following:
(a) The money shall be expended on capital improvements to,or acquisition of, real
property.
(b) During construction of all Mitigation and Neighborhood Projects,the City will
include the County as a funding source for any project for which the City would
provide signage.
(c) Mitigation and Neighborhood Projects acquired, developed, constructed or
improved by the City in whole or in part from Disbursement made pursuant to
this Agreement shall not be transferred or conveyed except by the City's standard
method.
(d) All Disbursements received by the City and interest thereon shall be expended
solely on the Mitigation and Neighborhood Projects contemplated by this
Agreement.
(e) The City shall invest all Disbursements pending expenditure. Investment earnings
on such monies shall be applied to uses permitted for Disbursements under this
Agreement.
6.4 Annual Reports. The City shall submit Annual Reports to the County. The first Annual
Report shall be submitted on or before the first anniversary of the Disbursement Date.
Subsequent Annual Reports shall be submitted not later than the anniversary each year of
01/31/01 9 MOA January 30, 2001.doc
_ the Disbursement Date, and continuing until all funds subject to this Agreement have been
expended. Each Annual Report shall include:
An accounting for any Disbursement received during the prior years including the
amount of funds expended within that year,total funds expended to date, interest
_ accrued and a list of projects for which funds were expended. Expenditure reports
shall establish that all Disbursements have been expended in the manner
contemplated by this Agreement.
SECTION 7. ALLOCATION AND ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES
7.1 Common Overall Responsibilities. The County's Wastewater Treatment Division
_ Manager and the Administrator shall:
_ (a) Serve as the point of contact and liaison during Mitigation and Neighborhood
Project and Eastside Interceptor Section I Project implementation (to each agency
and to other governmental agencies). This responsibility may be delegated to
other staff members of each agency for particular functions or purposes by mutual
consent of the Administrator and the County's Wastewater Treatment Division
Manager. This responsibility does not abridge statutory or certain permit
issuance responsibilities of other City officials, boards or commissions.
(b) Use collaborative problem solving and negotiation techniques to review and
attempt to resolve perceived conflicts that cannot be resolved by the Project
Managers.
(c) Review and revise, as necessary,the Project Schedules contained in Exhibit A-l.
7.2 Common Project Manager Responsibilities. The County Project Manager shall have
responsibility for the Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Project. The City Project Manager
shall have responsibility for the Mitigation and Neighborhood Projects. The Project
Managers shall:
01/31/01 10 MOA January 30, 2001.doc
(a) Provide each other,within a reasonable amount of time,with current and
necessary information as requested that pertains to their respective
responsibilities under the Agreement in order to expedite review.
(b) Use collaborative problem solving and negotiation techniques to identify and
_ attempt to resolve issues related to implementation of all Projects contemplated
under this Agreement.
(c) Convene meetings as necessary with the County Wastewater Treatment Division
_ Manager and the Administrator to discuss substantive issues, the project
_ schedules and activities related to the design, construction and implementation of
all Projects contemplated under this Agreement.
(d) Meet with the City and County technical, interagency and citizen advisory
committees and other interested persons as needed to carry out the purposes of
this Agreement.
(e) Be given,upon request,reasonable opportunities to brief the City Council and/or
County Executive and County Council on the status of all Projects contemplated
under this Agreement.
(f) The City Project Manager shall coordinate and facilitate plans and permit
processing by the City so as to expedite the City's review and approval of any
plans, reviews and permits related to the Eastside Interceptor Section I Project.
SECTION 8. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
8.1 Resolution of Disputes by Project Managers. The Project Managers shall use their best
_ efforts to resolve disputes and issues arising out of or related to the Projects
_ contemplated under this Agreement.
8.2 Resolution of Disputes by County Wastewater Treatment Division Manager and
Administrator. In the event that disputes cannot be resolved by Project Managers, the
_ County Wastewater Treatment Division Manager and Administrator will apply their best
efforts to resolve disputes and other matters between the County and the City arising out
01/31/01 11 MOA January 30, 2001.doc
of or related to the Projects contemplated by this Agreement. Each will consult with
responsible agency staff members and officials regarding existing requirements or other
policies and procedures before attempting to resolve disputes.
8.3 Resolution of Disputes by Administrator-and County Executive. If the Wastewater
Treatment Division and Administrator are unable to resolve a matter within fifteen(15)
days of the time such matter is properly referred to them, the City Mayor and County
Executive shall be asked to resolve the dispute, subject to applicable statutory permit
requirements,policies or procedures. In the event of an emergency, either Manager may
(after notifying the other Manager), refer a Project-related dispute immediately to the
City Mayor and Executive for resolution. The City Mayor and Executive may call upon x
their staff for assistance.
8.4 Exhaustion of Procedural Steps. The County and the City agree to exhaust each of these
procedural steps before seeking to resolve disputes in formal mediation, arbitration or
court of law or other tribunal, except to the extent that these procedures may conflict
with formal administrative appeal procedures.
SECTION 9. INDEMNIFICATION; TERMS OF AGREEMENT
9.1 Indemnification. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, the City and the
County shall each protect, indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other, respectively,
_ including its employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors, officers, directors, attorneys,
successors and assigns, from and against any and all liabilities, damages, claims,demands,
judgments, losses, harm, costs, expenses, suits or actions, including but not limited to
appeals, caused by the negligent acts or omissions of the indemnifying party, including its
agents, employees, contractors, subcontractors, officers, directors, attorneys, successors
or assigns, arising out of or in connection with or as a result of this Agreement or the
performance by the indemnifying party of any of its obligations hereunder.
9.2 Term. This Agreement shall be effective commencing on the first date when it has been
duly authorized and executed, by both the County and the City. Except as otherwise
01/31/01 12 MOA January 30, 2001.doc
specifically provided herein,this Agreement shall expire upon the completion of all
Projects contemplated hereunder;provided that the Agreement may be terminated at an
earlier or later date by mutual written agreement of the Parties.
SECTION 10. MISCELLANEOUS
10.1 Notices to King County. Until the County notifies the City in writing otherwise, all
_ notices to the County required under the terms of this Agreement shall be given in
writing, addressed as follows:
Don Theiler
Wastewater Treatment Division Manager
King County Department of Natural Resources
201 South Jackson Street, M.S. KSC-NR-0503
Seattle, Washington 98104-3855
Notices by facsimile or e-mail, if receipt is confirmed,may be used to expedite,but not
replace, the above procedure. The County's facsimile number is 206-684-1741. The e-
mail address is donald.theiler@metrokc.gov.
10.2 Notices to the City. Until the City notifies the County in writing otherwise, all notices
to the.City required under the terms of this Agreement shall be given in writing, addressed
as follows
Gregg Zimmerman,P.E.
_ Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator
The City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, Washington 98055
_ Notices by facsimile or e-mail, if receipt is confirmed,may also be used to expedite, but
not replace, the above procedure. The City's facsimile number is 425-430-7241. The e-
mail address is gzimmerman@ci.renton.wa.us.
01/31/01 13 MOA January 30, 2001.doc
10.3 Timing of Notices. All written notices required under this Agreement shall be deemed
received three (3)business days after the day they were mailed, or eight(8)regular
business hours after they were sent out for hand delivery to the addressee. Transmitted
and confirmed delivery of written notices via telephone facsimile,while expediting
reviews and possible responses, will not be considered official notification.
10.4 Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by either party without the prior
_ written consent of the other party.
10.5 Relationship of the Parties. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to create a partnership
or constitute a joint venture between the City and the County. No party to this
Agreement shall have any responsibility to perform services or to assume contractual
obligations which are the obligation of the other party. Nothing herein shall make either
party an agent or representative of the other party, or create any fiduciary relationship
between them.
10.6 Waiver. Unless otherwise specifically provided by the terms of this Agreement, no delay
or failure to exercise a right resulting from any breach of this Agreement shall impair such
right or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but such right may be exercised from
time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. Any waiver shall be in writing and
signed by the party granting such waiver. If any representation, warranty or covenant
contained in this Agreement is breached by either party and thereafter waived by the
other party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not
be deemed to waive any other breach under this Agreement.
10.7 Effect of Recitals. The recitals set forth in Section 1 above are a material part of this
Agreement and are fully incorporated in its terms.
10.8 Section Captions, References. The section headings and captions contained herein are
included for convenience only and shall not be considered a part hereof or affect in any
_ manner the construction or interpretation hereof. Except as otherwise indicated, all
references herein to sections and subsections are to sections and subsections of this
Agreement.
01/31/01 14 MOA January 30, 2001 .doc `�
10.9 Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall, for any reason,be
determined to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect,the parties hereto shall
negotiate in good faith and agree to such amendments,modifications or supplements of or
to this Agreement or such other actions as shall,to the maximum extent practicable in
light of such determination, implement and give effect to the intentions of the parties as
reflected herein. The other provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.
10.10 Amendment. This document may not be amended except by a written agreement signed
by the parties.
10.11 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of Washington. The venue for any actions hereunder shall be the
King County Superior Court.
10.12 No Other Agreements. All negotiations,proposals and agreements prior to the date of
this Agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof are merged herein and
superseded hereby.
10.13 Limitation of Liability. The obligations of the County under this Agreement are payable
solely from King County's Water Quality Operating Account. This Agreement is not
intended as, nor shall it be construed as, a debt or general obligation of King County. The
execution or performance of this Agreement shall not impose any personal liability on
any member, officers employee, agent, advisor or consultant of either the County or the
City.
10.14 Successors and Assiqns. This Agreement shall be binding on both parties and their
successors and assigns.
10.15 Execution of Documents. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate originals, and any
such duplicate original shall be regarded for all purposes as an original and all of which
shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
10.16 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. In promising performance to one another under this
Agreement,the Parties intend to create binding legal obligations to and rights of
X
01/31/01 15 MOA January 30, 2001.doc
enforcement in (i)one another, and (ii) one anther's permitted assignees or successors in
interest. The parties expressly do not intend to create any obligation or liability, or
promise any performance to, any third party. The parties have not created for any third
party, any right to enforce this Agreement.
_ IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the City and County have caused this Agreement to be
_ executed in their respective names,have caused their respective seals to be hereto affixed, and
have caused this Agreement to be attested, all by their duly authorized officers, and the City and
the County have caused this Agreement to be dated as of the date and year first written above.
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON CITY OF RENTON
B yl = ! L�y` B Y
Q,--
Je6ATanner
Its Its Mayor
Date �/ l9 Date oZO�
Approved as to form: Attes
Marilyn JVPe6hsen
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney City Clerk
Approved as to form:
i
Lawrence_J. Warren J
City Attorney
01/31/01 16 MOA January 30, 2001.doc
CITY OF RENTON
..I� Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department
Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
October 28, 2002
Glen Hiraki, Project Manager
King County
Eastside Interceptor Project Office
1200 Monster Road SW
Renton, WA 98055
SUBJECT: VERTICAL ADJUSTMENT FOR NEW 12-INCH WATERLINE
Dear Glen:
Per our field meeting this morning, October 28, 2002,we request the following changes to the
construction of the waterline:
1. Plan sheet C-401: Install two 12-inch 22-1/4 degree vertical bends with shackle rods and
concrete blocking north of the new valve at Sta.—0+13, so that the water line can cross
under the existing 36-inch storm line. A minimum vertical separation of
6-inches will be required at the crossing. This change is needed because the existing
18-inch water line is shallower than it is shown on the plan.
2. Plan sheets C-403 and C-405 Detail A: We request changing the two"Romac or
Dresser" 12-inch transition couplings at Sta. 11+64 and at Sta. 12+90 for the connections
of the HDPE to the DI pipes to 2-12-inch long body ductile iron solid sleeves with
mechanical joints. This change is needed to allow a stronger connection between the
HDPE and DI pipes, since they have a same outside diameter measurement.
Please request a cost proposal for the above changes from the contractor and forward it to me for
approval at your earliest convenience. The contractor's surveyor shall record the as-built vertical
and horizontal locations of the bends and submit them to the County and City. I understand the
contractor has already done the above work at the City inspector's direction. In accordance to our
inter-local agreement,we will make sure that any further request for changes from the City will
be forwarded to the County for review first.
Please call me at 425-430-7210 or e-mail: a afourkci.renton.wa.us if you have any questions
regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
60(kv l4kkurl,1�
Abdoul Gafour
Water Utility Supervisor
cc: Bill Helin,P.E.,Kristen Betty&Assoc.
Mark Wetherbee/Jan Illian—City of Renton Development Services
H/HesyVW M-27-2960-Moms Ave S /Correspandence with Kong Cnun waterline-changes-01 dne\AC:-If R E N T O N
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055
®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE
CITY OF RENTON
..tL Planninouilding/PublicWorks Department
J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
October 28, 2002 2-
William Cranston,P.E.
Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc.
1917— 1"Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101-1027
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR FULL-SIZE PLANS FOR WATER AND STORMWATER LINES IN
MORRIS AVE S. IN CONJUNCTION WITH KING COUNTY ESI PROJECT
Dear Bill:
Could you please provide us with one set of full-size construction plans for the new water line
and storm sewer line replacement in Morris Avenue South?
We would like a copy of the following:
• Sheets C 401 to C 406—Plan and profile of new water line and
• Sheets C 501 to C 505—Plan and profile for new storm line
Please invoice us for the printing and mailing of the above plans and call me at 425-7210 if you
have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
6W 6A-(0V1
Abdoul Gafour
Water Utility Supervisor
ft'fiiesys/'Wtit-27-2�bO-fvloijis Ave ufor plat s.doc
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 9 055 R E N T O N
®This paper contains 50%recycled material.30%post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE
0;!21/2001 10: 41 2066841959 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PAGE 02
12,0 lot
Eastside Interceptor Section 1
Capacity Restoration Project Z�►�' ���
Request for Additional Budget
for %rt•-� %{
Storm Sewer Design
The original scope of work was based on the instruction from the Renton
Stormwater Utility that they would provide the design parameters (pipe sizes and
alignments, inverts, and catch basins) for the consultant to incorporate into the
County contract documents. The budget was based both on this assumed level of
consultant participation and anticipation of providing design detail and form
consistent with the County documents. At the startup meeting in Renton in
December, we learned that the City had not yet prepared the storm system design
but expected to complete the design in 2 or 3 weeks. General design approach was
discussed at that time.
It was our understanding at that meeting that we would show installation of storm
drain lines along Morris Ave. between 5th St. and 7th St., including new catch basins
at typical intervals between 6th and 7th, as well as re-connection of several existing
catch basins between 51h and 6th. We agreed to provide a preliminary design by
January 15, 2001 for City review. To meet this schedule, we prepared a preliminary
design and subsequent revisions designed to resolve potential conflicts during
construction. The 90% documents, which contained subsequent design development
work, were submitted on January 30, 2001. Considerable design effort was
expended to accommodate existing sewer laterals for which the City was unable to
determine the location.
Upon receiving the comments on the preliminary design and the 90% drawings, we
found that the alignments had changed at the intersection of 71b and Morris, that
the inverts and pipe sizes had changed, and that additional catch basins had been
added. In addition, there was a new requirement that the existing catch basins and
,mil, the-connect' lines would have to be replaced. For the specifications, the pipe
�j terial was changed at this point ll. These changes were made and the
"991);. review ument were submitted.
In the 99% comments, the utility made further changes. More catch basins were
added, additional details were added, and a requirement for drawing the probtles of
the pipes connecting the replacement catch basins with the new interceptor was
added.
As noted above, the various iterations of design included re-sizing, re-elevating and
horizontally shifting the main storm sewer and adding additional catch basins. In
addition, increasing amounts of information and detail were requested at each
review, requiring increasing levels of effort beyond the standard set in the County
documents. We were essentially preparing drawings to a of detail level suited to
06/.21/2001 10: 41 2066@41959 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PAGE 03
unit price bidding, while our understanding had been that the work was to be
included as lump sum bid items in the County documents.
The changes can be summarized as follows:
? Why gyp, s�a�s rz�
1. Revised pipeline sizin and inverts, requiring redrawing of the plan and profile
drawings
?, 2. Revised pipe alignments in the Th/Morris intersection, requiring redrawing of
the intersection plans
3. Existing catch basins were replaced with new, requiring redrawing of the catch No
basins and connecting pipes
4. New catch basins were added, requiring additional design work and additional
drawing time to revise the plan and profile sheets
5. A requirement for profiles for the existing catch basin connections was added, 67-
requiring added drawing time for development of the profile detail drawings
Summary of budget changes:
Senior
Work Description Engineer Engineer CAD .
1. Revise pipeline inverts and sizes 1 2 6 "' J/
3 drawings)
2. Revise pipe alignments 2 4 6
-� IReplace catch basins (4,11 Nit `�`''"�`"� �5
✓ 4. Added catch basins 1 6 12
5. Catch basin profiles 1 6 12 (P,
Total Hours 5 20 40
Salary Rate $125.66 $72.85 $34.16
Subtotal $628 $1467 $1,366
Total Wage Cost $3 451
Professional Fee @ 10% $345
Total Additional Budget $3,796
CITY OF RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
Jesse Tanner,Mayor
May 1, 2001
William Cranston, P.E.
Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc.
1917 First Ave.
Seattle, WA 98101-1027
SUBJECT: EASTSIDE INTERCEPTOR SECTION 1 RESTORATION PROJECT
CONTRACT NO. E83010E—FINAL REVIEW
Dear Mr. Cranston:
Enclosed please find the plan set for water and storm with City comments in red. I'm also
returning the specs and half size drawings to you with some minor comments. Included are
copies of the standard City of Renton storm drain details that are to be included in the half size
plan set.
Please call me at 425-430-7247 if you have any questions related to the storm. Please contact the
Water Supervisor, Abdoul Gafour at 425-430-7210 for any water related issues.
Thanks.
Sincerely, l
1
Allen Quynn, oje Manager
Surface Water tility
cc: J.D.Wilson
-into
H:\DI VISIONS\UTILITIE.S\DOCS\2001\2001-228.doc\AQ\tb
1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055
9 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer en ten�1
Allen tuynn - ESI - Meeting on Renton Utility Design Page 1
From: "Cranston, William A." <wcranston@KCMINC.com>
To: "Christiansen, Dave" <dchristen@ci.renton.wa.us>, "Ball, Bruce"
<BBall@KCMINC.com>, "Dittmar, Dave" <d avid.dittmar@metrokc.gov>, "O'Neal, Mike"
<moneal@herrerainc.com>, <charris@herrerainc.com>, <rstraka@ci.renton.wa.us>,
<agafour@ci.renton.wa.us>, <aquynn@ci.renton.wa.us>
Date: 1/5/01 1:37PM
Subject: ESI - Meeting on Renton Utility Design
Attached are minutes of the Jan. 4 meeting between Renton staff and the ESI
design team. Action items are noted. Please review and comment as
appropriate. Thank you.
<<Renton Utilities 010401.doc>>
--Bill--
------e-mail: wcranston@kcminc.com
------Phone: (206) 443-2540
------Fax: (206)443-5372
Meeting Minutes Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc.
Date of Meeting: January 4, 2001
Project No.: 2830046-207
Project Name: Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration
Subject: Renton Utilities
In Attendance: Dave Christensen, Renton Sanitary
Abdoul Gafour, Renton Water
Ron Straka, Renton Storm Water
Allen Quynn, Renton Storm Water
Mike O'Neal, HEC
Court Harris, HEC
Bill Cranston, TT/KCM
Minutes Prepared by: Bill Cranston
Copies To: Dave Dittmar, KCDNR
Bruce Ball, TT/KCM
Central Files
Item Action
1. Water Line Under Railroad:
- HDPE pipe is acceptable to Renton Water for the line
under the railroad. 12" line is desired, but can reduce to
10" if clearance through the dip is a problem.
- Dave suggested that we consider Insituform for lining the
sewer pipe, since that would eliminate leaks and would
give a smooth lining for pulling the new pipe.
- Dave will get the side sewer card for the Dinner Train Christensen
connection to this sewer to clarify the location and size.
- Dave proposed that we connect the existing Dinner Train
sewer directly to the manhole structure at Morris and
Houser.
- North of the tracks, Abdoul wants the line to run to the
existing manhole at the ROW line. The manhole will be
removed and a connection made to the existing 4" line in
Morris. We will provide a tee for future connection to a
new 12" line that Renton will install.
- Renton will request a locate for the existing 4" line north Gafour
of the tracks.
- Dave will get us the information on the age of the existing Christensen
sewer pipe.
- The City has mapping prepared by PACE for the portion of
Morris north of the tracks. Dave will get us an electronic Christensen
copy of this map.
2. New Water Line in Morris:
- Pipe will be Class 52 DI, except for line under the railroad
Item Action
Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. • 1917 First Avenue • Seattle, WA 98101-1027 • Tel 206 443-5300 • Fax 206
443-5372
Eastside Interceptor Section I Capacity Restoration MEETING MINUTES(continued)
Job No.: 2830046-207 Page 2 January 4, 2001
(see note above).
- Services along Morris will be switched to the new 12" line.
- The existing 4" water line will be abandoned in place.
Abdoul requested that MJ plugs be used to close the
abandoned pipe off.
- Connection to the existing 18" water in line in 7th will be
made. The new line in Morris will be connected to the new
line under the railroad.
- The connection to the hydrant on Morris at 7th will be
revised for the new pipe size.
- Stubs for the connections at the cross streets will be run
past the intersections. 12" pipe will be used for these
stubs. The new 12" stubs should be a close as possible to
the existing 4" lines in the cross streets.
Provide 4 to 6 feet of cover over the water lines.
The water connections along Morris will extend at least to
the meters. The meters may be replaced; Abdoul will let Gafour
us know if the water meters along Morris will be replaced.
3. New Storm Sewer in Morris:
- A new 12" line will be run north from 7th to three pairs on
new catch basins between 6th and 7th. This line will
connect to the new storm line already being provided at
7th. The catch basins will be spaced at a maximum of 150
feet apart, starting about 150 feet south of 6th.
- The existing line between 5th and 6th will be replaced with
a new line. The size will be tentatively shown as an 18"
line. Allen will be preparing an analysis to determine the Quynn
final size. This should be complete in 2 or 3 weeks.
- The new line will replace the existing (i.e., the existing line
will not be abandoned in place).
- The catch basins will be on side sewers, not the main line.
The catch basin connections will be 12" pipe.
- Type 1 catch basins will be used. Manhole will be Type 2,
48" dia.
- As with the new water line, the new storm sewer will be
stubbed out beyond the intersection at each cross street
connection. The pipe sizes for the stubs will be 12" or as
defined by Renton.
- The invert of the line at the connection at 6th and Morris
will be the reference. The new line will be run a minimum
slope upstream from this point. The DOE criteria for
minimum slope will be used.
- The new storm sewer will be extended north of 5th to the
intersection of Houser and Morris. A new catch basin will
be placed on the southeast corner of the intersection. A
catch
Item Action
Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. • 1917 First Avenue • Seattle, WA 98101-1027 • Tel 206 443-5300 • Fax 206
443-5372
Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration MEETING MINUTES(continued)
Job No.:2830046-207 Page 3 January 4, 2001
basin will not be placed on the southwest corner at this
time since there is no curb. This extended line will be a
12" pipe.
- In wet weather, the contractor will have to contend with
bypassing of the storm flows.
4. Miscellaneous:
- Dave has sent TT/KCM a disk with the complete library of Cranston
Renton details. Bill will have Bruce Ball contact Mike
regarding the transfer of that information.
- The design team will work to have the preliminary design
plan and profile to the city staff by the end of next week
(Jan. 12). Our goal is to have completed documents for
the 90% review by the end of January.
As noted above, the hydraulic design for the storm water line will be complete
in 2 or 3 weeks. This may mean that the final documents would require
change after the 90% submittal if the storm water pipe size changes.
Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. • 1917 First Avenue • Seattle, WA 98101-1027 • Tel 206 443-5300 • Fax 206
443-5372
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 25, 2001
TO: Court Harris
FROM: Allen Quynn
SUBJECT: ESI—Storm Im rovements Along Morris Ave. between Houser
Way and SW 7th
The following are my comments to the preliminary design as well as design criteria for pipe size,
slope and invert elevations:
• Eliminate one of the manholes between 6`n and 71n. Beginning with the new bypass manhole
at 7`n (sta 0+23), space two Type II CBs 150 feet apart.
• Lower the invert of the proposed 12" pipe connecting into the bypass manhole at 71n to match
the invert of the proposed 36" pipe running west (El. 116.48 — King County Datum). Hopefully
this will allow the storm pipe to clear the sewer laterals. Maintain the same slope of 0.22%.
• Shift the pipe west 2-ft to allow additional horizontal clearance from the 8" sewer. Maintain
at least 5-foot separation between storm and water line. This can be accomplished by either
shifting the manholes along the alignment including the bypass manhole at 71n or leaving the
bypass manhole where it is, offsetting the next manhole to the north and angling the pipe to the
northwest.
I'm not sure a CB is necessary on the southwest corner of the intersections at 6`n and 51n. It
appears to me that there is very little runoff draining to those locations. Most of the runoff from
Morris Ave., SW 51n and 6`n will be intercepted at the other three corners of those intersections.
What do you think?
• Eliminate the manhole stub outs east and west of Morris Ave. and 61n and the stub out
manhole east of Morris Ave. and 5`n.
• The new storm pipe along Morris Ave. between 51n and 6`n will be a 24" CPEP set at a slope
of 0.48%. The north invert for the new Type II CB at Morris and 6`n will be set at El. 22.44
(NAVD 88). The south invert for the new Type II CB at Morris and 5`n will be set at the existing
invert El. 25.10 (NAVD 88). Match inverts with the existing 12" pipes east and west at Morris
Ave. and 61n and west at Morris Ave. and 51n
0 There appears to be a conflict with a 4" water line and the proposed CBs on the south side of
the intersection of Morris Ave. and 5`n
• Show all lateral profiles for Type I CBs.
If you have any questions, please call me at 425-430-7247.
Thanks.
cc: Ron Straka
\\TS_SERVER\SYS2\t1SR\AQUYNN\2001\S._Renton\Morris_Ave\reviewcomments.doc\a
t
12/12/00
_1/ 'NO. E83010E
Y5 —5 ' 1dil CEPTOR SECTION 1
JRATION PROJECT
iE AND STORM SEWER
OF WORK
;ultant prepare drawings and technical specifica-
15 ine to replace existing 4" and 6" lines and a new
orris Avenue South above the new bypass tunnel.
Interceptor Section I Capacity Restoration(ESI)
ultant responsibilities for the water line and storm
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The objective of the project is to prepare construction drawings and technical specifications for
the water line and storm sewer in Morris Ave. S. between S. 5th St. and S. 7th St. in Renton.
RENTON RESPONSIBILITIES
The City of Renton will provide the following as input to the preparation of the construction
documents:
• Sizing and routing of the water and storm sewer lines !aL
• Standard Renton water and storm sewer details .-
• Standard Renton technical specifications for water and storm sewer projects
• Record information, including drawings and condition surveys, for the existing water and
storm sewer lines
• Record drawings for other city-owned street utilities. - `7c.4,r, "14A
TASK 220-WATER LINE DESIGN
1. Preliminary Design
Based upon Renton-supplied information and survey information developed under Task
206, Surveying,Consultant will prepare preliminary plan and profile drawings for the wa-
ter line. These drawings will be prepared using the base maps developed under Task 206,
but will be separate drawings from those developed for the tunnel construction.
Deliverable:
1. Preliminary plan and profile water line drawings for review(5 half-sized and 6 fiill size
copies)
-1-
r
7
Eastside Interceptor Section 1 12/12/00
Capacity Restoration Project
Renton Water Line and Storm Sewer
2. Final Design
Following the receipt of comments on the preliminary design drawings from King County
and Renton, Consultant will prepare final water line drawings and technical specifications
for incorporation into the ESI contract documents. Drawings will include plan and profile
drawings and detail sheets, including details of the connection of the new water line to the
existing water lines.
The drawings and technical specifications will be submitted for review at the 90% design
stage. Following receipt of review comments from King County and Renton,Consultant
will prepare final drawings and technical specifications for incorporation into the contact
documents.
Deliverables:
1. 90%final design drawings and technical specifications for the water line for review(5
copies of half-sized drawings,6 copies of full sized drawings,and technical specifica-
tions)
2. 100%final design drawings and technical specifications for the water line(1 repro-
ducible full size copy, 5 half size sets,and 1 electronic copy,all submitted with the ESI
contract documents)
3. Cost Estimate
At the 90% stage of design,Consultant will prepare an opinion of probable cost of con-
struction for the water line. Upon submittal of the final contract documents,this opinion of
probable cost of construction will be updated and included with the Engineers Bid Estimate
prepared for the ESI contract as a separate line item.
Deliverables:
l.Opinion of probable cost of construction for the water line for review at 90%(5 copies)
2.Engineers Bid Estimate for the water line, included with the Engineers Bid Estimate for
the ESI project(5 copies)
TASK 221 -STORM SEWER DESIGN
1. Preliminary Design
Based upon Renton-supplied information and survey information developed under Task
206, Surveying, Consultant will prepare preliminary plan and profile drawings for the
storm sewer. These drawings will be prepared using the base maps developed under Task
206, but will be separate drawings from those developed for the tunnel construction.
-2-
t '
Eastside Interceptor Section 1 12/12/00
Capacity Restoration Project
Renton Water Line and Storm Sewer
Deliverable:
1. Preliminary plan and profile storm sewer drawings for review(5 half-sized and 6 full
sized copies)
2. Final Design
Following the receipt of comments on the preliminary design drawings from King County
and Renton, Consultant will prepare final storm sewer drawings and technical specifica-
tions for incorporation into the ESI contract documents. The drawings will include plan
profile drawings and detail sheets.
The drawings and technical specifications will be submitted for review at the 90%design
stage. Following receipt of review comments from King County and Renton,Consultant
will prepare final drawings and technical specifications for incorporation into the contact
documents.
Deliverables:
1. 90%final design drawings and technical specifications for the storm sewer for review
(5 copies of half-sized drawings, 6 copies of full sized drawings,and technical specifi-
cations)
2. 100%final design drawings and technical specifications for the storm sewer(1 repro-
ducible full size copy, 5 half size sets, and 1 electronic copy,all submitted with the ESI
contract documents)
3. Cost Estimate
At the 90% stage of design,Consultant will prepare an opinion of probable cost of con-
struction for the storm sewer. Upon submittal of the final contract documents,this opinion
of probable cost of construction will be updated and included with the Engineers Bid Esti-
mate prepared for the ESI contract as a separate line item.
Deliverables:
1. Opinion of probable cost of construction for the storm sewer for review at 90%(5
copies)
2. Engineers Bid Estimate for the storm sewer, included with the Engineers Bid Estimate
for the ESI project(5 copies)
7
Eastside Interceptor Section 1 12/12/00
Capacity Restoration Project
Renton Water Line and Storm Sewer
TASK 320-WATER LINE CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE
Provide limited construction assistance services for the water line construction, including sub-
mittal review, design clarifications, and change request reviews, as requested by the King County
Project Representative. As requested by the King County Project Representative, attend site
meetings with the water line contractor and make site visits to observe the construction work. If
requested by the King County Project Representative, attend pre-final inspection and final in-
spection and make observations to determine if the final work is acceptable. Record drawings
will be prepared by King County's CM consultant.
Deliverables:
1. Meeting minutes,as required
2. Site observation reports,as required
3. Pre-final and final inspection reports,as requested.
TASK 321-STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE
Provide limited construction assistance services for the storm sewer construction, including sub-
mittal review,design clarifications,and change request reviews,as requested by the King County
Project Representative. As requested by the King County Project Representative,attend site
meetings with the storm sewer contractor and make site visits to observe the construction work.
If requested by the King County Project Representative,attend pre-final inspection and final in-
spection and make observations to determine if the final work is acceptable. Record drawings
will be prepared by King County's CM consultant.
Deliverables:
1. Meeting minutes,as required
2. Site observation reports,as required
3. Pre-final and final inspection reports, as requested.
-4-
Printed:12/14/00,9:02 AM Page 1
Eastside Interceptor (b)_% Project
Section 1 Capacity Lifetime Labor
Restoration Project E83010E Rate Escalation Task 220:Water Line Design
Consultant Firm: Phone: Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration Project
Tetra Tech/KCM,Inc. (206)443-5300 (c)_%OH Rate Tetra Tech/KCM,Inc.
1917 First Ave. F 158,57% E83010E
Seattle, WA 98101 Fax: (d)_%Fee
(206)443-5372 r 12.00%
ODC;
-- _ _ +h _d,t -t+J (nt -(o)=ODC
Direct Labor Costs (a) Escalation (� La(or ) Direct Labor Labor&OF (/)-Fee Subtotals Units Subtotals
e Labor-Rate- ) Dlre1 hr-OH o (i)"Dlrect (k)-DLC- No.of
Position: Raw Labor Rate ) a`b Hours -f` a+e c'g g T =m"n
Bill Cranston $42.64 8 $341.12 $540.91 $882.03 $105.84 $987.87
- -
Bruce Ball $37.98 12 $455.76 $722.70 $1,178.46 $141.42 $1,319,88
Jeff Wicke $32.64 4 $130.56 $207.03 $337.59 $40.51 $378.10
JeffFullner $23.55 8 $188.40 $298.75 $487.15 $58.46 $545.61
Clerical $19.78 3 $59.34 $94.10 $153.44 $18.41 $171.85
III
i
� I
i
Subtotals 35 $1,175.18 $1,863.49 $3,038.67 $364.64 $3,403.31'!.
i
i
Other Direct Costs Units Unit Costs
Items (I) (M) - --
Photocopies Page $0.10 1001 $10 00
Long Distance Phone Actual Cost $1.00
Mileage Mile $0.325 100, $32.50
Large Copies S FFt $0.20 50 $10.00
Computer CADD Hour $12.00 12 $144.00
Computer Micro Hour $4.00 20 $80.00
Computer Publishing Hour $8 00 10 $80.00
Color Printing(8.5xl1) Each $1.50 10 $15.00
22x34 Plots Bond Each $4 00 40 $160 00
ODC Totals $531.50
Renton Utilities Change-Nov 2000.xis,TT-KCM Water Design
Printed:12114/00,9:04 AM
Eastside Interceptor (b)=% Project
Section 1 Capacity Lifetime Labor
Restoration Project E83010E Rate Escalation Task 220:Water Line Design
Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration Project
Consultant Firm: Phone:
Herrera Environmental (206)441-9080 (c)=%OH Rate Herrera Environmental
2200 Sixth Ave.,Suite 601 1 108.44% E83010E
Seattle,Wa 98121 Fax: (d)=%Fee
(206)441-9108 f 10.00%
-- red=LaborRate-=Hu, .
i )'=OF#o r=Olre�t- -- -(k)-=DLC-j-No-of ODC-1-(o)-=ODC--
Direct Labor Costs (a) Escalation r Direct Labor labor&OH Q)=Fee Subtotals j Units ; Subtotals
Position: Raw Labor Rate =a"b +e) =c`g =g+h =d`i =i+1 (n) =m"n
Mike O'Neal $45.23 14 $633.22 $1,066.60 $1.699.82 $169.96 $1,869.80
Andy Behnke $26.81 24 $643.44 $1,083.81 $1,727.25 $172.73 $1,899.98
Court Harris $25.85 24 $620.40 $1,045.00 $1,665.40 $166.54 $1,831.94
Paul Chiechlowski $28.85 44 $1,269.40 $2.138.18 $3,407.58 $340.76 $3.748.34
Laura Costanzo $19.50 24 $468.00 $788.30 $1,256.30 $125.63 $1,381.93
Kevin Houck $12.00 24 $288.00 $485.11 $773.11 $77.31 $850.42
Sue Dunigan $18.03 8 $144.24 $242.96 $387.20 $38.72 $425.92
Theresa Wood $29.55 4 $118.20 $199.10 $317.30 $31.73 $349.03
Subtotals 166 $4,184.90 $7,049.06 $11,233.96 $1,123.40 $12,367.36
Other Direct Costs Units Unit Costs
Items (Q _ (m) - -
Copies Page $0.15 j 50 _$7.50
Mileage Mile $0.325 _ 75 $24.38
Facsimile Transmission Copy $1.00 _ __ 50 _ $50 Do
Computer CADD hour $12.00 68 $816.00
$897.88
CDC Totals
Renton Utilities Change•Nov 2000.x1s,HEC Water Design
Printed:12/14/00,9:05 AM Page 1
Eastside Interceptor (b)=% Project
Section 1 Capacity Lifetime Labor
Restoration Project E83010E Rate Escalation Task,320-Water Line Construction Assistance
Consultant Firm: Phone: F 10.25% Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration Project
Tetra Tech/KCM,Inc. (206)443-5300 (c)=%OH Rate Tetra Tech/KCM,Inc.
1917 First Ave. F 1-58,57% E83010E
Seattle,WA 98101 Fax: (d)=%Fee
(206)443-5372 F 12.00% i1i1
Escalation _ Labor Direct Labor Labor 6,OH Fe� Subtotals Units (oJ=ODC
Direct Labor Costs (a) e--LaborRate- - g)--Direc h OH-onT(f)=Direct (J)_ (k)-DLC No.of CDC! Subtotals
Position: Raw Labor Rate )_a'b Hours -f'(a+e c'g g h =d'i I J (n) =m"n
4.57 _
Bill Cranston $42.64 $4.37 4 $188.04 $298.18 $486.22 $58.35 $54
Bruce Ball $37.98 $3.89 4 $167.48 $265.57 $433.05 $51.97 $485.02
Jeff Wicke $32.64 $3.35
Jeff Fullner $23.55 $2.41 4 $103.84 $164.66 $268.50 $32.22 $300.72
Clerical $19.78 $2.03 3 $65.43 $103.75 $169.18 $20.30 $189.48
I
i
i I
Subtotals 15 $524.79 $832.16 $1,356.95 $162.84 $1,519.79i
Other Direct Costs Units Unit Costs
Items (1) (m) __-'
Photocopies Page $0.10 100. $10.00
Long Distance Phone Actual Cost $1.00
Mileage Mile $0.325 150 $48.75
Large Copies Sq Ft $0.20 25 $5.00
Computer CADD Hour $12.00 4 $48.00
Computer Micro Hour $4.00 10 $40.00
Computer Publishing Hour $8.00
Color Printing(8.5x11) Each _ $1.50 - -_ --_,-!-----__
22x34 Plots Bond Each $4.00 25 $100,00
DOC Totals $251.75
Renton Utilities Change-Nov 2000.xls,TT-KCM Water Costt.
Page 1
Prieted:12114100,9:05 AM
Eastside Interceptor (b)=% Project
Section 1 Capacity Lifetime Labor v
Restoration Project E83010E Rate Escalation Task d20-Water Line Construction Assistance
Consultant Firm: Phone: F 10.25% Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration Project
Herrera Environmental (206)441-9080 (c)=%OH Rate Herrera Environmental
2200 Sixth Ave.,Suite 601 F 1-68,44% E83010E
Seattle,Wa 98121 Fax: (d)=%Fee
(206)441-9108 10.00%
- - --- - - --- -(e)=-LaborRate (g)-=Direct (h)-=OH on -(i)=Direct - (k)=DLC No.of ODC (0)=ODC
Direct Labor Costs7Rw
a) Escalation (t) Labor Direct Labor Labor&OH �)-Fee Subtotals Units Subtotals
Position. bor Rate =a'b Hours =f•(a+e) =c"g =a+h =d'i =i+j (n) =m_n
Mike O'Neal $45.23 $4.64 4 $199.48 $336.00 $535.48 $53.55 $589.03
Andy Behnke $26.81 $2.75 12 $354.72 $597.49 $952.21 $95.22 $1,047.43
Court Harris $25.85 $2.65 8 $228.00 $384.04 $612.04 $61.20 $673.24
Paul Chiechlowski $28.85 $2.96 4 $127.24 $214.32 $341.56 $34.16 $375.72
Laura Costanzo $19.50 $2.00 8 $172.00 $289.72 $461.72 $46.17 $507.89
Kevin Houck $12.00 $1.23
Sue Dunigan $18.03 $1.85 8 $159.04 $267.89 $426.93 $42.69 $469.62
Theresa Wood $29.55 $3.03 2 $65.16 $109.76 $174.92 $17.49 $192.41
I
CADD
Peter Sparhawk
Subtotals 46 $1,305.64 $2,199.22 $3,504.86 $350.48 $3,855.34
Other Direct Costs Units Unit Costs
Items (I) (m)
Copies -- Page $0.15 50_ $7.50
Mileage Mile $0.325 75 $24.38
Facsimile Transmission Copy $1.00 __ 25 $25.00
Computer CADD hour $12.00 __12 $144.00
ODC Totals $200.88
Renton Utilities Change-Nov 2000.xls,HEC Water Const.
Printed:12/14100,9:04 AM Page 1
Eastside Interceptor (b)_% Project
Section 1 Capacity Lifetime Labor
Restoration Project E83010E Rate Escalation Task 221:Storm Sewer Design
Consultant Firm: Phone: Eastside Interceptor Section i Capacity Restoration Project
Tetra Tech/KCM,Inc. (206)443-5300 (c)_%OH Rate Tetra Tech/KCM,Inc.
1917 First Ave. F 158.57% E83010E
Seattle, WA 98101 Fax: (d)_%Fee
(206)443-5372 F 1-2.00%
--- --- e)-=tabor Rate- (g)-=Direct (h) OH-on (i)-=Direct --- (k)=DLC i No.of CDC (o)=ODC
Direct Labor Costs (a) Escalation (� labor 1 Direct Labor Labor&OH 6)=Fee Subtotals Units Subtotals
Position: Raw Labor Rate_ =a'b Hours =f'(a+e)I =c'g =g+h =d'i =i+J (n) =m'n
Bill Cranston $42.64 8 $341.12 $540.91 $882.03 $105.84 $987.8 -1
Bruce Ball $37.98 12 $455.76 $722.70 $1,178.46 $141.42 $1,319.88
Jeff Wkke $32.64 4 $130.56 $207.03 $337.59 $40.51 $378.10
JeffFullner $23.55 8 $188.40 $298.75 $487.15 $58.46 $545.61
Clerical $19.78 3 $59.34 $94.10 $153.44 $18.41 $171.85
I
I
I
!, I
i
i
Subtotals 35 $1,175.18 $1,863.49 $3,038.67 $364.64 $3,403.31
Other Direct Costs Units Unit Costs
i
Items (I) (m) -_---
Photocopies Page $0.10 100 $10.00
Long Distance Phone Actual Cost $1.00 -
Mileage Mile $0.325 100 $32.50
Large Copies Sq Ft $0.20 50 $10.0o
Computer CADD Hour $12.00 12 $144.00
Computer Micro Hour $4.00 20. $80.00
Computer Publishing Hour $8.00 $80.00
- -- --- - --- -- __, -- - 10
Color Printing(8.5xl1) Each $1.50 $60.00
22x34 Plots Bond Each $4.00 40 $160.00
ODC Totals $531.50
Renton Utilities Change-Nov 2000.xis,TT-KCM Sewer Design
Page 1
Printed:12/14/00,9:05 AM
Eastside Interceptor (b)=% Project
Section 1 Capacity Lifetime Labor
Restoration Project E83010E Rate Escalation Task 221:Storm Sewer Design
Consultant Firm: Phone: Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration Project
Herrera Environmental (206)441-9060 (c)=%OH Rate Herrera Environmental
2200 Sixth Ave.,Suite 601 F 188.44% E83010E
Seattle, Wa 98121 Fax: (d)=%Fee
(206)441-9108 10.00%
-�(et=taborRate - - - k)-=Dt No-of ODC (o)=-ODC--
Direct labor Costs (a) Escalation (1) labor Direct Labor Labor&OH E=d
ee Subtotal Units Subtotals
Position: Raw Labor Rate =a"b [Hours =f'(a+e) =c'g =g+h 'i =i+j (n) =m'n
-- --- -- -
Mike O'Neal $45.23 10 $452.30 $761.85 $1.214.15 $121.42 $1,335.57
Andy Behnke $26.81 16 $428.96 $722.54 $1,151.50 $115.15 $1.266.65
Court Harris $25.85 16 $413.60 $696.67 $1,110.27 $111.03 $1,221.30
Paul Chiechlowski $28.85 36 $1,038.60 $1.749.42 $2,788.02 $278.80 $3.066.82
Laura Costanzo $19.50 16 $312.00 $525.53 $837.53 $83.75 $921.28
Kevin Houck $12.00 16 $192.00 $323.40 $515.40 $51.54 $566.94
Sue Dungan $18.03 8 $144.24 $242.96 $387.20 $38.72 $425.92
Theresa Wood $29.55 4 $118.20 $199.10 $317.30 $31.73 $349.03
Subtotals 122 $3,099.90 $5,221.47 $8,321.37 $832.14 $9,153.51
Other Direct Costs Units Unit Costs
Items (I) (m)
Copies Page $0.15 50 $7.50
Mileage Mile $0.325 75 $24.38
Facsimile Transmission Copy $1.00 50 _$50.00
Computer CADD hour $12.00 52 $624.00
CDC Totals $705.88
Renton Utilities Change-Nov 2000.xis,HEC Sewer Design
Printed.12/14100,9:05 AM Page 1
Eastside Interceptor (b)=% Project
Section 1 Capacity Lifetime Labor
Restoration Project E83010E Rate Escalation Task 321-Storm Sewer Construction Assistance
Consultant Firm: Phone: F 10.25% Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration Project
Tetra Tech/KCM,Inc. (206)443-5300 (c)=%OH Rate Tetra Tech/KCM,Inc.
1917 First Ave. F 158,57% E83010E
Seattle, WA 98101 Fax: (d)=%Fee
(206)443-5372 12.00%
-- ------ =LaborR.te
e)=tabor-Rate -�(gJ=Direc h)=OWon (i -Direct 7 (k)=DLC- No.of ODC (o)=CDC
Direct Labor Costs Escalation (>) Labor Direct Labor�Labor&OH p)-Fee Subtotals Units Subtotals
Position: Raw =a'b Hours =f'(a+e) =C'g =g+h d'i =t+J (n) =m'n
Bill Cranston $42.64 $4.37 4 $188.04 $298.18 $486.22 $58.35 $544.571
Bruce Ball $37.98 $3.89 4 $167.48 $265.57 $433.05 $51.97 $485.02I
Jeff Iicke $32.64 $3.35
Jeff Fullner $23.55 $2.41 4 $103.84 $164.66 $268.50 $32.22 $300.72
Clerical $19.78 $2.03 3 $65.43 $103.75 $169.18 $20.30 $189.481
Subtotals 15 $524,79 $832.16 $1,356,95 $162.84 $1,519.79
Other Direct Costs Units Unit Costs
Items (I) (m)
Photocopies Page $0.10 100 $10.00
Long Distance Phone Actual Cost $1.00
Mileage Mile $0.325 1501 $48.75
Large Copies Sq Ft $0.20 25 $5.00
Computer CADD Hour $12.00 $48.00
--- -- ---- - ------- - _ -_ 10.
Computer Micro Hour $4.00 $40.00
Computer Publishing Hour $8.00 _ ------
Color Printing(8.5x11) Each $1.50
22x34 Plots Bond Each $4.00 25 $100.00
CDC Totals $251.75
Renton Utilities Change-Nov 2000.xis,TT-KCM Sewer Contt.
Page 1
Printed:12/14100,9:05 AM
Eastside Interceptor (b)=% Project
Section 1 Capacity Lifetime Labor
Restoration Protect E83010E Rate Escalation Task 321-Storm Sewer Construction Assistance
Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration Project
Consultant Firm: Phone: 10.25%
Herrera Environmental (206)441-9080 (c)=%OH Rate Herrera Environmental
2200 Sixth Ave.,Suite 601 F 168.44% E83010E
Seattle,Wa 96121 Fax: (d)=%Fee
(206)441-9108 10.00%
-- er LaborT,ate- -Dues trr=OW-on (Ij=Dtrect- --�-(k)=DLC�No.o/ODC (o)=ODC
Direct Labor Costs (a) Escalation (f) Labor Direct Labor Labor 6 OH �)=Fee Subtotals Units Subtotals
Position: Raw Labor Rate =a•b Hours =f"(a+e) =c•g =g+h -d•i =i+j (n) =m"n
___ _-_.__ -- -----
Mike O'Neal $45.23 $4.64 4 $199.48 $336.00 $535A8 $53.55 $589.03
Andy Behnke $26.81 $2.75 12 $354.72 $597.49 $952.21 $95.22 $1,047.43
Court Harris $25.85 $2.65 8 $228.00 $384.04 $612.04 $61.20 $673.24
Paul Chiechlowski $28.85 $2.96 4 $127.24 $214.32 $341.56 $34.16 $375.72
Laura Costanzo $19.50 $2,00 8 $172.00 $289.72 $461.72 $46.17 $507.89
Kevin Houck $12.00 $1.23
Sue Dunigan $18.03 $1.85 8 $159.04 $267.89 $426.93 $42.69 $469.62
Theresa Wood $29.55 $3.03 2 $65.16 $109.76 $174.92 $17.49 $192.41
CADD
Peter Sparhawk
i
Subtotals 46 $1,305.64 $2,199.22 $3.504.86 $350.48 $3,856.34
Other Direct Costs Units Unit Costs
Items (1) (m)
Copies Page $0.15 50 $7.50
Mileage Mile $0.325 75 $24.38
Facsimile Transmission Copy $1.00 _ 25 $25_00
Computer CADD hour $12.00 12 $144.00
ODC Totals $200.88
Renton Utilities Change•Nov 2000.x/s,HEC Sewer Const.
Printed: 12/14/00, 9:05 AM Page 1
Eastside Interceptor Section 1 Capacity Restoration Project
E83010E
Water and Storm Sewer Design and Construction Services
Summary of Estimated Costs
Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc.
Other Direct
Task Task Budget Fee Hours Costs
220 Water Line Design $3,934.81 $364.64 35 $531.50
221 Storm Sewer Design $3,934.81 $364.64 35 $531.50 �,Z3 •7j
3;K0 Water Line Construction Assistance $1,771.54 $162.84 15 $251,75
321 Storm Sewer Construction Assistance $1,771.54 $162.84 15 $251.75
Firm Totals $11,412.70 $1,054.96 100 $1,566.50
Herrera Environmental Consultants
Other Direct
Task Task Budget Fee Hours Costs
220 Water Line Design $13,255.24 $1,123.40 166 $897.88
221 Storm Sewer Design $9,859.39 $832.14 122 $705.88 1(� 311.`l�
3�20 Water Line Construction Assistance $4,056.22 $350.48 46 $200.88
321 Storm Sewer Construction Assistance $4,056.22 $350.48 46 $200.88
Firm Totals $31,227.05 $2,656.50 380 $2,005.50
ZD tit
2-orb2
—47
Renton Utilities Change-Nov ZOOO.xIs, Summary