The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSWP272899(10) CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: September 10, 2001 To: Gary Schimek/Surface Water Utility From: Elizabeth Higgins/Development Plannin Subject: Maplewood Golf Course Regrade Project No. LUA-01-105,ECF,SM This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit(SM)will be issued separately. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425)430-7382. Enclosure: Advisory Notes FINAL CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-01-105,SM,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton/Surface Water Utility PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Golf Course Regrade DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: This City of Renton project is to regrade approximately 6,000 square yards (300 yards by 20 yards) of rough and fairway of the Maplewood Golf Course near the Cedar River. The purpose of the work is to create a berm (sloped area) to provide protection from potential floods that would be in excess of the 100-year flow, as measured by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The graded area would be landscaped following construction. Due to the proximity of the project to the Cedar River, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit will be required. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: At the Maplewood Golf Course hole number 3, adjacent to State Route 169 (Maple Valley Highway), in tax lots 222305 9009 and 2223059010. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. The following will be required per City code: 1. Erosion control measures during and immediately after construction including: a) Install and maintain temporary erosion control measures for unpaved road, parking, or disturbed areas. b) Minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. c) Place silt fencing along areas abutting the Cedar River for the duration of the project. d) Sweeping haul route as necessary. e) Following construction, revegetate disturbed sloped areas. 1. Soil on site shall be kept moist, as necessary, during the period of the project implementation to reduce airborne dust. advisorynotes CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: August 22, 2001 To: Gary Schimek/Surface Water Utility From: Elizabeth Higgins/Development Planning Subject: Maplewood Golf Course Regrade Project No. LUA-01-105,ECF,SM This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on August 21, 2001, decided that your project will be issued a Determination of Non- Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on September 7, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425)430-7382. Enclosure: Advisory Notes ACCEPTANCE CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-01-105,SM,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton/Surface Water Utility PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Golf Course Regrade DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: This City of Renton project is to regrade approximately 6,000 square yards (300 yards by 20 yards) of rough and fairway of the Maplewood Golf Course near the Cedar River. The purpose of the work is to create a berm (sloped area) to provide protection from potential floods that would be in excess of the 100-year flow, as measured by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The graded area would be landscaped following construction. Due to the proximity of the project to the Cedar River, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit will be required. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: At the Maplewood Golf Course hole number 3, adjacent to State Route 169 (Maple Valley Highway), in tax lots 222305 9009 and 2223059010. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. The following will be required per City code: 1. Erosion control measures during and immediately after construction including: a) Install and maintain temporary erosion control measures for unpaved road, parking, or disturbed areas. b) Minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. c) Place silt fencing along areas abutting the Cedar River for the duration of the project. d) Sweeping haul route as necessary. e) Following construction, revegetate disturbed sloped areas. 2. Soil on site shall be kept moist, as necessary, during the period of the project implementation to reduce airborne dust. advisorynotes CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-01-105,SM,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton/Surface Water Utility PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Golf Course Regrade DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: This City of Renton project is to regrade approximately 6,000 square yards (300 yards by 20 yards) of rough and fairway of the Maplewood Golf Course near the Cedar River. The purpose of the work is to create a berm (sloped area) to provide protection from potential floods that would be in excess of the 100-year flow, as measured by the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). The graded area would be landscaped following construction. Due to the proximity of the project to the Cedar River, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit will be required. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: At the Maplewood Golf Course hole number 3, adjacent to State Route 169 (Maple Valley Highway), in tax lots 222305 9009 and 2223059010. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on September 7, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: August 24, 2001 DATE OF DECISION: August 21, 2001 SIGNATURES: Gregg Zimm m n, Ad i is t r DATE Department P nnkg/Building/Public Works Jim Sheph6rd, Adfifiinistrator _ DATE Community Services Department zz Lee e-i Fire ief DATE Renton Fire Department Documend 4; g CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 22, 2001 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on August 21, 2001: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MAPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE REGRADE LUA-01-105,SM,ECF This City of Renton project is to regrade approximately 6,000 square yards (300 yards by 20 yards) of rough and fairway of the Maplewood Golf Course near the Cedar River. The purpose of the work is to create a berm (sloped area)to provide protection from potential floods that would be in excess of the 100-year flow, as measured by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The graded area would be landscaped following construction. Due to the proximity of the project to the Cedar River, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit will be required. Location: At the Maplewood Golf Course hole number 3, adjacent to State Route 169 (Maple Valley Highway), in tax lots 222305 9009 and 2223059010. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on September 7, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7382. For the Environmental Review Committee, Elizabeth Higgins, AICP Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers EnclosureI1tQ UM Washington state 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-01-105,SM,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton/Surface Water Utility PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Golf Course Regrade DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: This City of Renton project is to regrade approximately 6,000 square yards (300 yards by 20 yards) of rough and fairway of the Maplewood Golf Course near the Cedar River. The purpose of the work is to create a berm (sloped area) to provide protection from potential floods that would be in excess of the 100-year flow, as measured by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The graded area would be landscaped following construction. Due to the proximity of the project to the Cedar River, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit will be required. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: At the Maplewood Golf Course hole number 3, adjacent to State Route 169 (Maple Valley Highway), in tax lots 222305 9009 and 22230590`10. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information,provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. The following will be required per City code: 1. Erosion control measures during and immediately after construction including: a) Install and maintain temporary erosion control measures for unpaved road, parking, or disturbed areas. b) Minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. c) Place silt fencing along areas abutting the Cedar River for the duration of the project. d) Sweeping haul route as necessary. e) Following construction, revegetate disturbed sloped areas. 2. Soil on site shall be kept moist, as necessary, during the period of the project implementation to reduce airborne dust. advisorynotes fs%—/� 61V 7 / Have you seen this f, 142".'e- Pao, rr Man u Estee 20C ( tic-, r Learn to identify salmon in your local stream! Help us to learn more about our local salmon and what they need to thrive. Where do salmon spawn? How far are they able to swim up the small streams that drain into Lake Washington? How are salmon faring in the small streams that drain directly to Puget Sound. These are the types of questions we need answered to allow us to help Salmon populations in the greater Lake Washington watershed. No prior experience is needed to become a volunteer salmon watcher. Individuals, teams, schools, clubs — all are welcome to help with this important project. How can you help? First, come to one of the training workshops listed below. Learn to identify salmon, sign up for observation locations, and get your data forms. After training, you will watch for fish from a bridge crossing, public footpath, or your backyard at least two times each week during the salmon-spawning season — September through December. (You will not be walking in streams.) There will be training workshops conducted by fish and wildlife biologists. All workshops meet from 7 to 9 PM. Training will occur in Renton • Wed. Aug. 29 • Renton City Hall, 7th FI. • 1055 S Grady Way CITY OF"RENTON"" DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT COMPLETE APPLICATION REQUIRED: The City will not accept an application that does not have all of the required items. In order to accept your application, each of the following must be submitted at the same time. If you have received a prior, written waiver of a submittal item(s)during a preapplication meeting, please provide this form in lieu of any submittal item not provided. APPLICATION TIMES: All applicants are encouraged to bring in one copy of the application package for informal review by staff prior to formal application and fee payment in order to ensure the application is complete. This should be done prior to making the requested number of copies. Applications will be accepted at the 6th floor counter of the Renton Municipal Building, 1055 South Grady Way, between 8:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. Monday through Friday. No appointment is necessary. Please allow for 20 to 30 minutes for application screening. Due to the screening time required, applications delivered by messenger cannot be accepted. EARLY CONSULTATION: Prior to submitting an application, the applicant should informally discuss the proposed development with the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division will provide assistance and detailed information on the City's land use requirements and standards. For further information on this project, see the instruction sheet entitled "Submittal Requirements for Preliminary Project Review." PURPOSE: The purpose of shoreline permit application review is to ensure that proposed shorelines development is consistent with the goals and policies of the Shoreline Master Program. NOTE: The State d#:VI/ashin'gton Depa triierit of Fisheries acid/or the Arrhyt orpsVEng nee�rs<i iay also require permits for your project. You should contact these agencies directly to determine their requirements and development standards- APPLICATION MATERIALS: �d S x ostdfage ., 1 � , �, _ u�._. 1. Land Use Permit Master Application: Please provide the original plus eleven (11) copies (12 total)of the COMPLETED Master Application form. Application must have notarized signatures of ALL current property owners listed on the Title Report. The legal description of the property must be listed on the application form. If the legal description references any other recorded documents (i.e. easements, public use dedications, restrictive covenants)five (5) copies of the referenced recorded documents must also be provided. 2. Environmental Checklist: Please provide twelve (12)copies of the Environmental Checklist. If a particular question on the checklist does not apply, please do not leave it blank. Fill in the space with "Not Applicable". A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 3. Mailing Labels: Please submit two (2)sets of self-adhesive mailing labels including the name, mailing address, and King County Assessor's account numbers for all property owners within three hundred feet(300')of the boundaries of the subject site. DO NOT provide envelopes, metered postage or stamps. The Development Services Division will provide these items, although postage is paid by the applicant. 4. List of Surrounding Property Owners: Please submit two (2) copies of a signed and notarized City of Renton Development Services Division "List of Surrounding Property Owners"form listing all current property owners and their mailing addresses and King County Assessor's account numbers within three hundred feet (300')of the boundaries of the subject site as obtained from a Title Company or the King County Assessor's Office. The list shall include a notarized statement attesting that the ownership information provided is current and accurate. Current shall mean obtained within the past thirty (30)days unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. 5. Fees: The application must be accompanied by the required application fee(see Fee Schedule) and first class postage rate per mailing label. Please DO NOT provide metered postage or stamps. Please call (425)430-7294 to verify the exact amount required. We cannot accept checks for over the total fee amount. r .,. M Nv- . 6. Preapplication Meeting Summary(if applicable): If the application was review at a 11preapplication meeting"and a written summary was provided to you, please provide five (5) copies of the summary. 7. Project Narrative: Please provide twelve (12)copies of a clear and concise description and summary of the proposed project, including the following: • Project name, size and location of site; • Zoning designation of the site and adjacent properties; • Current use of the site and any existing improvements; • Special site features (i.e.wetlands,water bodies, steep slopes); • Statement addressing soil type and drainage conditions; • Proposed use of the property and scope of the proposed development(i.e. height, square footage, lot coverage, parking, access, etc.); • Proposed off-site improvements (i.e. installation of sidewalks, fire hydrants, sewer main, etc.); • Total estimated construction cost and estimated fair market value of the proposed project; • Estimated quantities and type of materials involved if any fill or excavation is proposed; • Number, type and size of trees to be removed; • Explanation of any land to be dedicated to the City; • Any proposed job shacks, sales trailers, and/or model homes; • Name of water area and/or wetlands within which development is proposed; • Nature of the existing shoreline. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp,flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any.); • In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty- five feet(35')above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view; and, • If the application involves a conditional use or variance, set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, in the case of variance, from which the variance is being sought. 2 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 8. Construction Mitigation Description (if applicable): Please provide five (5) copies of a written narrative addressing each of the following: • Proposed construction dates (begin and end dates); • Hours of operation; • Proposed hauling/transportation routes; • Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics; • Any specialty hours proposed for construction or hauling (i.e.weekends, fate nights); and, • Preliminary traffic control plan. 9. Neighborhood Detail Map: Please provide twelve (12)copies of a map drawn at a scale of one inch equals one hundred feet(1" = 100')or one inch equals two hundred feet(1" =200') (or other scale approved by the Development Services Division Director). This map shall show the location of the subject site relative to the property boundaries of the surrounding parcels within approximately one thousand feet(1,000'), or approximately two thousand five hundred feet (2,500')for properties over five (5)acres, and identifying the subject site with a darker perimeter line than that of surrounding properties. This map will be used to identify the site location on public notices and to review compatibility with surrounding land uses. The map shall also show: the property's lot lines, existing land uses, building outlines, boundaries of the City of Renton (if applicable), north arrow(oriented to the top of the plan sheet), graphic scale used for the map, and City of Renton (not King County) street names for all streets shown. Kroll Map Company (206 448-6277) produces maps that may serve this purpose or you may use the King County Assessor's maps as a base for the Neighborhood Detail Map. Additional information (i.e. land uses and building outlines for adjacent sites)will need to be added by the applicant. 10. Site Plan: Please provide eleven (11) copies of a fully dimensioned plan sheet drawn at a scale of one inch equals twenty feet(1" =20') (or other scale approved by the Development Services Division Director). We prefer that the site plan be drawn on ONE sheet of paper unless the size of the site requires that several plan sheets be used. If you are using more than a single plan sheet, please indicate connecting points on each sheet. The Site Plan should show the following: • Name of proposed project; • Date, scale, and north arrow (oriented to the top of the paper/plan sheet); • Drawing of the subject property with all property lines dimensioned and names of adjacent streets; • Widths of all adjacent streets and alleys; • Location of all existing public improvements including, but not limited to, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, median islands, street trees, fire hydrants, utility poles, etc., along the full property frontage; • Location and dimensions of existing and proposed structures, parking and loading areas, driveways, existing on-site trees, existing or proposed fencing or retaining walls, free- standing signs, easements, refuse and recycling areas,free-standing lighting fixtures, utility junction boxes, public utility transformers, storage areas,job shacks/sales trailers/model homes, buffer areas, open spaces, and landscaped areas; • The location and dimensions of natural features such as streams, lakes, marshes and wetlands; • Ordinary high water mark, existing and proposed; 3 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 10. Site Plan (continued): • Name of water body; and, • For wireless communication facilities, indicate type and locations of existing and new plant materials used to screen facility components and the proposed color(s)for the facili . " • Total square footage of the site; • Square footage (by floor and overall total) of each individual building and/or use; • Total square footage of all buildings (footprint or each building); • Total impervious surfacing (pavement, etc.). List the square footage of both existing impervious to remain plus new impervious to be installed, and total square footage of parking areas; • Percentage of lot coverage; • Square footage of all landscaping (total, parking lot, and existing wildlife habitat/undeveloped area); • Square footage of any on-site wetlands and/or slopes greater than 40 percent; • Allowable and proposed building height, • Building setbacks required by Code(N,S,E,W); • Proposed building setbacks (N,S,E,W); • Parking analysis, including: • Number of stalls required by Code(if more than one use/ratio show required number for each use); • Total number of stalls proposed (if less or more than total number required by Code, also attach a request for a parking modification to the application package); • Size of various types of stalls proposed; • Angles of stalls (if other than 90 degree); • Location and number of"ADA accessible", compact, employee and/or guest parking stalls, and parking space dimensions; • Location and size of curb cuts; • Traffic and flow within the parking, loading, and maneuvering areas and ingress and egress; • Location of wheel stops; • Loading space(s)—Location and dimensions; • Number of stacking space(s)for any drive-up windows; and, • Location and dimensions of bicycle racks, bus shelters, carpool parking spaces, and other facilities designed to accommodate access to the site. e�tW.a �E.' E31 S1Zk .oA 11. Architectural Elevations: Please provide, for each building elevation (N,S,E,W), twelve (12) copies of a twenty four inch by thirty six inch (24"x 36")fully dimensioned architectural elevation plan drawn at a scale of one-fourth inch equals one foot(1/4" = V)or one-eighth inch equals one foot(1/8" = V) (or other size or scale approved by the Development Services Division). The plans must clearly indicate the information required by the"Permits" section of the currently adopted Uniform Building Code and RCW 19.27 (State Building Code Act, Statewide amendments), including, but not limited to the following: • Identify building elevations by street name (if applicable) and orientation i.e. Burnett Ave. (west) elevations; • Existing and proposed ground elevations; • Existing average grade level underneath proposed structure; 4 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit • Height of existing and proposed structures showing finished roof top elevations based upon site elevations for proposed structures and any existing/abutting structures; • Building materials and colors including roof, walls, any wireless communication facilities, and enclosures; • Fence or retaining wall materials, colors, and architectural design; • Architectural design of on-site lighting fixtures; and, • Cross section of roof showing location and height of roof-top equipment(include air conditioners, compressors, etc.)and proposed screening. :fin O N �� ,��, © N., 12. Grading Elevations: Please provide twelve (12)copies of a topography map showing existing contours and proposed changes in elevations. Plans shall be required if the grades on site exceed twenty percent (20%)or in the amount of earth to be disturbed exceeds five hundred (500)cubic yards. The plan shall detail the type of materials comprising the proposed fill or extraction (in tons and cubic yards). For extractions, identify the disposal site. 13. Utilities Plan, Generalized (sewer,water, stormwater,transportation improvements): Please provide five (5) copies of a plan drawn on twenty two inch by thirty four inch (22"x 34") plan sheets using a graphic scale of one inch equals forty feet (1" =40') (or other size or scale approved by the Development Services Division Plan Review Supervisor) clearly showing all existing (to remain)and proposed public or private improvements to be dedicated or sold to the public including, but not limited to, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, median islands, street trees, fire hydrants, utility poles, refuse areas, free-standing lighting fixtures, utility junction boxes, public utility transformers, etc., along the full property frontage. The finished floor elevations for each floor of proposed and existing (to remain)structures shall be shown. 14. Drainage Control Plan (except when waived by Plan Review Section): Please provide five (5) copies of a plan drawn to scale and stamped by a Washington State licensed engineer complying with the requirements of Renton Municipal Code, Section 4-6-030 and the King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton. 15. Drainage Report(except when waived or modified by Plan Review Section): Please provide four (4)copies of a report complying with the requirements of the City of Renton Drafting Standards, Section 4-6-030 of the City of Renton Municipal Code and the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), 1990 edition, as adopted by the City of Renton. The report must contain the following: • The stamp and signature of a Washington State licensed professional engineer; • Complete Technical Information Report(TIR)Worksheet; • A description of the existing and proposed on-site drainage features and the construction required; • Core and Special Requirements: • Show that Core Requirements 1 - 5 in Section 1.2 of KCSWDM are addressed; • Show that all Special Requirements in Section 1.3 of KCSWDM, that are applicable to this project, are addressed; • Use the SBUH/SCS hydrograph method to compute required on-site detention using 2, 10, and 100 24-hour design storm events for pre-developed and post-developed conditions (6 separate peak flows); • Biofiltration preliminary and conceptual design calculations (per Section 4.6), if for project site sub-basins with more than 5000 square feet of new impervious area subject to vehicular use or storage of chemicals; 5 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit • Wet pond sizing preliminary and conceptual design calculations (if there is more than one (1) acre of new paved impervious area and meets other conditions of Special Requirement#5); and, • A Level 1 Off-Site Analysis, as described in Core Requirement#2. (Level 2 or 3 analysis may be requested later if a downstream problem is found or anticipated from review of the initial submittal of the Drainage report). 16. Geotechnical Report(except when waived by Plan Review Section): Please provide five (5) copies of a study prepared and stamped by a licensed professional engineer including soils and slope stability analysis, boring and test pit logs, and recommendations on slope setbacks, foundation design, retaining wall design, material selection, and all other pertinent elements. 17. Fill Source Statement: (Required only for projects located within an Aquifer Protection Area): Unless exempt by RMC 4-8-120f, if the project will involve stockpiling or grading of imported fill at the project site in excess or 50 cubic yards in APA Zone 1 or 100 cubic yards in APA Zone 2, please provide five (5)copies of a"source statement"certified by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington. A source statement, as defined in RMC 4-8-120D19, shall be required for each source location from which imported fill will be obtained. If the project is located within an Aquifer Protection Area but no fill is planned for the site, please state this in the"Project Narrative". However, if you do not know the source of the fill at this stage, you will be required to provide this information at the time of building or construction permit application. 18. Flood Plain Map(if applicable): Please provide twelve (12)copies. 19. Wetlands Delineation Map and Wetlands Classification Study: (Required if ANY wetlands are located on the subject property or within 100' feet of the subject property.) Please provide twelve (12)copies of the map and five (5)copies of the study. The study shall include an analysis of the type and extent of wetlands prepared by a wetland specialist based upon a field investigation using the procedures found in the 1987 Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands or later adopted identification and delineation methodology. 20. Landscaping Plan, Conceptual: Please provide five (5)copies of a fully dimensioned plan drawn at the same scale as the project site plan (or other scale approved by the Development Services Division), clearly indicating the following: • Date, graphic scale, and north arrow; • Location of proposed buildings, parking areas, and access and existing buildings to remain; • Names and locations of abutting streets and public improvements, including easements; • Existing and proposed contours at five foot(6) intervals or less; • Location and size of planting areas; • Location and height of proposed berming; • Location and elevations for any proposed landscape-related structures such as arbors, gazebos, fencing, etc.; and, • Location, size, spacing and names of existing and proposed shrubs, trees, ground covers, and decorative rockery or like landscape improvements in relationship to proposed and existing utilities. le Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 21. Floor Plans: Please provide five (5)copies of a basic line drawing plan of the general building layout showing walls, exits and designated uses indicating the proposed locations of kitchens, baths and floor drains, with sufficient detail for City staff to determine if an oil/water separator or grease interceptor is required and to determine sizing of side sewer. Floor plans are not required for speculative construction projects. If you do not provide floor plans, your project narrative must state that the project is a "speculative" project. 22. Tree Cutting/Land Clearing (tree inventory) Plan: This is required if ANY trees or vegetation are to be removed or altered (if no trees or vegetation will be altered, please state so in your project narrative). Please provide four(4)copies of a plan, based on finished grade, drawn to scale with the northern property line at the top of the paper clearly showing the following: • All property boundaries and adjacent streets; • Location of all areas proposed to be cleared; • Types and sizes of vegetation to be removed, altered or retained. This requirement applies only to trees, six inch (6")caliper, "at chest level", and larger; • Future building sites and drip lines of any trees which will overhang/overlap a construction line; • Location and dimensions of rights-of-way, utility lines, and easements; and, • Any trees on neighboring properties which are within 25 feet of the subject property and which may be impacted by excavation, grading or other improvements. tfr €� M-9perfnttt �pta� laitr s)oien 11 01 t'permit has been suet r, N: 23. Traffic Study: Please provide five (5)copies of a report prepared by a State of Washington licensed engineer containing the elements and information identified in the City of Renton "Policy Guidelines for Traffic Impact Analysis of New Development" in sufficient detail to define potential problems related to the proposed development and identify the improvements necessary to accommodate the development in a safe and efficient manner. 24. Screening Detail, Refuse/Recycling (Elevation): Please provide twelve (12)copies of a detailed plan drawing, prepared to scale, showing heights, elevations and building materials of proposed screening and/or of proposed plantings. 25. Plan Reductions: For the application to be accepted, it must include one(1)eight and one-half inch by eleven inch (8 Y2"x 11") PMT reduction of all required full size plan sheets but not limited to landscape plans, conceptual utility plans, site plan, neighborhood detail map, topography map, tree cutting/land clearing plan,grading plan,and preliminary plat plan (or similar). Because these reductions are used to prepare public notice posters and to provide the public with information about the project,they need to be legible photocopies. A PMT reduction is an original white/opaque(NOT TRANSPARENT) photographic reduction;. Xerox reductions or plotted reductions cannot be accepted. Please ensure that the reduced Neighborhood Detail Map is legible and will provide enough cross streets'to easily identify,the project location when cropped to fin in a (4"by 6")public notice space. Once the PMT reductions have been made, please also provide one 8%r by 11"photocopy of each PMT sheet. Royal Reprographics(425-251-8230),-, Ford Graphics-(206-622-5517, 206-443-6900,or 253-383-6363), and Kestrel Blueprint (425-883-1110)`are a few of the printing companies that provide thlsoservlce y F: 7 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 26. Colored Display Maps: (Folded to 8 1/2" by 11".) DO NOT MOUNT ON FOAM-CORE OR OTHER BACKING. Please color one (1)copy of each of the following full size plan (24"x 36"or other size approved)sheets with a wide (1/4"or larger)felt tip marker for use in presenting your project to the Environmental Review Committee and Hearing Examiner: • Neighborhood Detail Map; • Site Plan; and, • Landscaping Plan. The following colors are recommended: Red North Arrow, outer property boundary. Proposed new lot lines (dashed). Do not color existing lot lines which are to be eliminated or relocated. Black Street names identified with lettering of at least one inch (1") in height. Street names must be legible at a distance of fifteen feet(15'). Tan Existing buildings (Please do not color buildings which will be demolished or removed.) Yellow Proposed buildings Lt. Green Landscaped areas Dk. Green Areas of undisturbed vegetation 27. Conditional Use/Variance Requirements: If the application requires a conditional use permit or variance, you must also attach the additional submittals required for these applications (see the submittal requirement instruction sheets for shoreline variances conditional uses available at the Development Services counter and Sections 8.01 through 8.04 of the City Shoreline Management Program). Additional review fees are also required (see fee schedule). If applying for a shoreline variance, please list the code sections from which you wish to vary. REVIEW PROCEDURE FOR SHORELINE DEVELOPMENTS NOT INVOLVING VARIANCES OR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS: Once the City has mailed out notices to property owners within 300'of the site and puts up posters, interested parties have fourteen (14)days to comment on the proposed development. During this time City staff reviews the proposal. Once the initial fourteen (14)day comment period has passed, the Development Services Division will schedule the project for Environmental Review Committee. After the environmental determination is made and the fourteen to twenty nine (14-29)day comment/appeal period(s)have expired, the Planning/Building/Public Works Department will issue a decision to approve or deny the permit. The decision will be mailed to the State of Washington Department of Ecology. After receipt of the decision, the Department of Ecology commences a twenty one (21)day review period during which appeals can be made. If no appeals are filed during this twenty one (21)day period, the project is eligible to receive a building permit (provided the plans and application are acceptable to the Building Section). 8 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit REVIEW PROCEDURE FOR SHORELINE DEVELOPMENTS WHICH REQUIRE VARIANCES AND/OR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS: A shoreline substantial development permit application requiring a variance and/or conditional use permit follows the same process as a normal shoreline substantial development permit up through the environmental determination stage. However, the application is then forwarded on the City Hearing Examiner for public hearing and a final determination instead of receiving an administrative decision from Development Services staff. The determination of the Examiner is then forwarded to the State Attorney General's State Department of Ecology for final approval or denial. If the Department of Ecology and/or Attorney General do not object to the Examiner's determination within thirty (30) days, the Examiner's decision will become final. APPEAL PROCESS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS ON SHORELINE DEVELOPMENTS NOT INVOLVING VARIANCES OR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS: Any person, including the applicant, aggrieved by the granting or denial of a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit has fourteen (14)days to appeal the decision (in writing)to the City Hearing Examiner. The appeal must be submitted in accordance with Section 4-8-110 of the Renton Municipal Code. APPEAL PROCESS FOR HEARING EXAMINER DECISIONS ON SHORELINE VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS OR APPEALS OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS: Any person, including the applicant, aggrieved by the granting or denial of a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit/Conditional Use/Variance may appeal the decision within thirty(30) days to the State Shorelines Hearings Board (as provided by Section 18(1)of the State Shorelines Management Act of 1971). The applicant must concurrently file copies of the appeal with the State Department of Ecology, the State Attorney General's office, the City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department and the City Clerk. Either the Department of Ecology or the Attorney General must certify the appeal request as valid in order for the review to continue. Certification must be given within thirty (30) days. If the request is certified, the Hearings Board conducts a review and sustains or overturns the decision of the City of Renton. Any party who fails to obtain certification or is aggrieved by the decision of the Hearings Board may appeal to the Superior Court. DEFERRAL OF IMPROVEMENTS: If a developer wishes to defer certain on-site improvements, written application shall be made to the Board of Public Works stating the reasons why such delay is necessary. If approval is granted, a performance bond or certified check shall be furnished to the City in an amount equal to a minimum of 150 percent of the estimated cost of the required improvements. EXPIRATION OF SHORELINE PERMIT: An approved Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and/or Shoreline Conditional Use Permit and/or Shoreline Variance shall expire, becoming null and void, two (2)years from the effective date of the Shoreline Permit/Conditional Use/Variance unless construction activities have commenced. Where no construction activities are involved, the use or activity shall be commenced within two (2)years of the effective date of a substantial development permit. The effective date of a substantial development permit shall be the date of the last action required on the substantial development permit and all other government permits and approvals for the development that authorize the development to proceed, including all administrative and legal actions on any permits or approvals. 9 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit A greater length of time may be approved by the City at the time of permit issuance upon finding of good cause. However, actual construction of the project must be completed within five (5)years of the effective date of the Shoreline Permit approval. EXTENSION OF SHORELINE PERMIT APPROVAL: The City of Renton may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed one (1)year based on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record on the substantial development permit and to the State Department of Ecology. EXPIRATION OF BUILDING PERMIT: Authorization to conduct construction activities shall terminate five (5)years after the effective date of a substantial development permit. However, the City may authorize single extension for a period not to exceed one (1)year based on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record and to the department. SHORAPP.DOC REVISED 12/00 10 CITY OF RENTON OEVEL.UPME;. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION CITY OF LAND USE PERMIT JUL MASTER APPLICATION RECEk PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION Note: If there is more than on legal owner,please attach an additional notarized Master application to each owner. NAME: CITY OF "NTON PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:Maplewood Golf Course Regrade ADDRESS: 1055 South Grady Way PROPERTY/PROJECr/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION and Zip Code: Portions of golf course Hole Number 3 located adjacent to north of City: Renton ZIP: 98055 Maple Valley Highway(SR 169) t .f 'i! G) ZZ, T;2 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER:N/A TELEPHONENUMBER 425-430-7200 n . - G EXISTING LAND USE(S):Golf course APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: CITY OF RENTON PROPOSED LAND USE(S):Golf course Surface Water Utility Number of Employees: (estimated):N/A COMPANY(if applicable): N/A EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: Same as Above PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: City: ZIP: (if applicable)No changes proposed. TELEPHONE NUMBER Same as Above EXISTING ZONING: CONTACT PERSON ��' C'rn^sb� 7 E�� ✓} PROPOSED ZONING:(if applicable)No changes proposed. NAME: Gary Schimek, P.E. COMPANY(if applicable): City Of Renton SITE AREA in SQ.FT:Approximately 27,300 SQ.FT ADDRESS:- 1055 South Grady Way PROJECT VALUE: S196,000 City: Renton ZIP: 98055 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? Yes TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS:(425)430-7205 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF GSchimek@ci.renton.wa.us ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? The Cedar River is located adjacent to the project. Masterap 3/00 LEGAL DESC- TPTION OF PROPERTY (Attacr parate sheet if needed) - TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees. _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION:N/A —REZONE $ —SPECIAL PERMIT $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT $ _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ X SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT $ X GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ _FINAL PLAT $ (No. Cu.Yds: 4,400) _VARIANCE $ (from Section: ) $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ N/A _WAIVER $ _PRELIMINARY _ROUTINE VEGETATION _FINAL MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN MOBILE HOME PARKS:N/A $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: X SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ _EXEMPTION $ X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 1,(Print Name) Gafy declare that I am(please check one) the owner of the property involved in this application, the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are.in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that CY 11 this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluryts .-I- purposes mentioned in the instrument. a i I►'1 e k Q .C.t C- �':p`�t.10TAR),m ��ter N( of wner/Re r ntati a pL ,C P ) Notary Public in and for the State of Washi g n � � �CSLc i Notary(Print) 1-100 C FE 2 ,/-I Nl�ST D S s;�Q _ (Signatur Owner/Representative) My appointment expires: 20 0 11� �//�$�_:- (THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY STAFF.) City File Number: ECF SA R SHPL CU LLA PP FP TP SP RVMP V AAD W FPUD SM SME MHP BSP A CPA TOTAL FEES: $ TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED:$ Masterap 3/00 NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Notice is hereby given that: City of Renton has filed an application for a substantial development permit for the construction or development of: A flood protection berm adjacent to the Cedar River to protect the Maplewood Golf Course and residential and commercial areas west of the golf course from floods exceeding the current 100-year flood. located at: 4050 Maple Valley Highway within Sections(s) 22 of Township /288� N, Range 5 E , W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Said development is proposed to be within Cedar River and/or its associated wetlands. Any person desiring to express his views or to be notified of the action taken on this application should notify the City of Renton Development Services Division, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way., Renton, Washington 98055 in writing of his interest within thirty (30) days of the last publications of this notice. Publication dates of this notice are and Masterap 3/00 WASHINGTON JOINT AQUATIC RESOURCE PERMITS APPLICATION (JARPA) —INSTRUCTIONS — This Joint Application can be used to apply for Hydraulic Project Approvals, Shoreline Management Permits,Approvals for Exceedance of Water Quality Standards,Water Quality Certifications, Coast Guard Bridge Permits, Department of Natural Resources Use Authorization, and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. You must submit readable copies of the completed application form together with detailed drawings,prepared in accordance with the drawing guidance in Appendix A to the appropriate agencies. You do not need to send the example drawings, the instructions, or the Appendices. Remember, depending on the type of project you are proposing, other permits may be required that are not covered by this application. Use the following checklist to determine which permits to apply for. Your project may require some or all of these permits. If you have trouble deciding which permits you need, please contact the appropriate agency for questions. Agency telephone numbers are in Appendix B. IF YOU CHECK ANY BOX UNDER A PERMIT TITLE,THEN YOU MUST APPLY FOR THAT PERMIT. Complete Sections A&C for any of the permits listed below. Also complete Section B for Shoreline and Army Corps of Engineers permits. Detailed drawings are required for any of these permits(see Appendix A for drawing requirements). ♦ Hydraulic Proiect Approval from the Department of Fish and Wildlife under 75.20 RCW is required if your project includes construction or other work,that: ❑will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any fresh or salt water of the state. This includes all construction or other work waterward and over the ordinary high water line, including dry channels, and may include projects landward of the ordinary high water line(e.g., activities outside the ordinary high water line that will directly impact fish life and habitat, falling trees into streams or lakes, etc.). c k WASHINGTON _ Oy� J!M JOINT AQUATIC RESOURCE PERMITS APPLICATION (JARPA) — INSTRUCTIONS— This Joint Application can be used to apply for Hydraulic Project Approvals, Shoreline Management Permits, Approvals for Exceedance of Water Quality Standards, Water Quality Certifications, Coast Guard Bridge Permits, Department of Natural Resources Use Authorization, and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. You must submit readable copies of the completed application form together with detailed drawings,prepared in accordance with the drawing guidance in Appendix A to the appropriate agencies. You do not need to send the example drawings, the instructions, or the Appendices. Remember, depending on the type of project you are proposing, other permits may be required that are not covered by this application. Use the following checklist to determine which permits to apply for. Your project may require some or all of these permits. If you have trouble deciding which permits you need, please contact the appropriate agency for questions. Agency telephone numbers are in Appendix B. IF YOU CHECK ANY BOX UNDER A PERMIT TITLE,THEN YOU MUST APPLY FOR THAT PERMIT. Complete Sections A&C for any of the permits listed below. Also complete Section B for Shoreline and Army Corps of Engineers permits. Detailed drawings are required for any of these permits(see Appendix A for drawing requirements). ♦ Hydraulic Proiect Approval from the Department of Fish and Wildlife under 75.20 RCW is required if your project includes construction or other work, that: ❑will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any fresh or salt water of the state. This includes all construction or other work waterward and over the ordinary high water line, including dry channels, and may include projects landward of the ordinary high water line(e.g., activities outside the ordinary high water line that will directly impact fish life and habitat, falling trees into streams or lakes, etc.). ♦ Shoreline Substantial Development,Conditional Use,Variance Permit,or Exemption from Local Government(under the Shoreline Management Act, 90.58 RCW;) required for work or activity in the 100-year floodplain, or within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of certain waters; and which includes any one of the following: ❑ dumping; ❑ drilling; ❑ dredging; ❑ filling; ❑ placement or alteration of structures(whether temporary or permanent); or ❑ any activity which substantially interferes with normal public use of the waters regardless of cost. ♦ Floodplain Management permits and/or Critical Areas Ordinances review by Local Government for: ❑work in frequently flooded areas, geologically unstable areas, wildlife habitats, aquifer recharge areas, and wetlands. ♦ Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the Department of Ecology under 33 USC§ 1341 is needed when a federal approval is required for a project, including the following: ❑ Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit—Send to Ecology's Environmental Review Section; ❑ FERC hydropower license—Attach FERC exhibit E and send to Ecology's Water Resources Program; and ❑ A Corps of Engineers individual permit—Send only to Corps of Engineers; the Corps will notify Ecology. ♦ Approval to Allow Temporary Exceedance of Water Quality Standards from the Department of Ecology, under 90.48 RCW, if your project results in: ❑ a temporary exceedance of water quality criteria established by WAC 173-201A for in water work(e.g., changes in turbidity from sediment disturbances and pH changes from concrete curing)—send to Ecology's regional office. NOTE:Application of aquatic herbicides and pesticides are covered by a separate application). ♦ Aquatic Resources Use Authorization Notification from the Department of Natural Resources is required if your project: ❑ is on, crosses, or impacts the bedlands, tidelands or shorelands of a navigable water. Form#JAR-PA Revised Date 12/96 Instruction Page 1 of 2 ♦ Section 404 Permit from the Corps of Engineer under 33 USC§ 1344 is required if your project includes: ❑ discharge or excavation of dredged or fill material waterward of the ordinary high water mark, or the mean higher high tide line in tidal areas, in waters of the United States, including wetlands; ❑ mechanized land clearing in waters of the United States, including wetlands. ♦ Section 10 Permit from the Corps of Engineer is required for: ❑ any work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States (e.g., floats, piers, docks, dredging, piles, buoys, overhead power lines, etc.). ♦ Section 9 Permit from the Coast Guard is required for: ❑ construction of a new bridge or modification to an existing bridge over a navigable waterway. USEFUL DEFINITIONS The following definitions are presented to help applicants In completing the JARPA. They may not necessarily represent specific language from the laws Implemented through JARPA. Ordinary High Water Mark or Line means the visible line on the banks where the presence and action of waters are so common as to leave a mark upon the soil or vegetation:Provided,that In any area where the ordinary high water Ilse cannot be found the ordinary high water line adjoining saltwater shall be the line of mean higher high water and the ordinary high water line adjoining freshwater shall be the elevation of the mean annual flood. Mean Lower Low is the 0.0 tidal elevation,determined by averaging each day's lowest tide at a particular location over a period of 19 years. It is the tidal datum for vertical tidal references in the salt water area. Mean High Water and Mean Higher High Water Tidal Elevations at any specific location can be found in tidal benchmark data compiled by the United States Department of Commerce, Environmental Science Services Administration, Coast and Geodetic Survey, dated January 24, 1979. This information can be obtained from the Corps of Engineers at(206)764-3495. The determination of tidal elevation is obtained by averaging each day's highest tide at a particular location over a period of 19 years, measured from mean lower low water, which equals 0.0 tidal elevation. Shorelands or shoreland areas means those lands extending landward for two hundred feet in all directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark; floodways and contiguous floodplain areas landward two hundred feet from such floodways; and all wetlands and river deltas associated with the streams, lakes, and tidal waters which are subject to the provisions of 90.58 RCW. Shorelines means all water areas of the state, including reservoirs, and their associated wetlands, together with the lands underlying them, except stream segments upstream of the point where mean annual flow is less than 20 cubic feet per second, and lakes less than 20 acres in size. Wetlands means areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Bridge means any structure including pipelines and conveyor belts,which transports traffic or materials across a navigable water. Instruction Page 2 of 2 ..:;.,.;.,. , ::: .::. .: ::: .. . �<......... :::::> ::::::::. .........date I t . l r :':':..::: :> Y.:::::::::::::.: :. . �:e.::::::::: .... : :.:........ :.;:.;:.;;;::.;:.;::.;:::.;:.:.. .:... .::: ...... ;:.::. JARPA FORM (tor use in Washington State) s Yo PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN BLUE OR BLACK INK Based on the preceding checklist,I am sending copies of this application to the following: (check all that apply) ❑ Local Government for shoreline: ❑Substantial Development ❑Conditional Use ❑Variance ❑ Exemption;or,if applicable ❑ Floodplain Management ❑Critical Areas Ordinance ❑ Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for HPA ❑ Washington Department of Ecology for: ❑Approval to Allow Temporary Exceedance of Water Quality Standards ❑401 Water Quality Certification Nationwide Permits ❑ Washington Department of Natural Resources for:❑Aquatic Resources Use Authorization Notification ❑ Corps Engineers for:❑Section 404 ❑Section 10 permit ❑ Coast Guard for: ❑Section 9 Bridge Permit SECTION A -Use for all permits covered by this application. Be sure to also complete Section C(Signature Bloch for all permit appllcat/ons. 1.APPLICANT MAILING ADDRESS WORK PHONE HOME PHONE FAX# If an agent Is acting for the applicant during the permit process,complete#2. 2.AUTHORIZED AGENT MAILING ADDRESS WORK PHONE HOME PHONE FAX# 3.RELATIONSHIP OF APPLICANT TO PROPERTY: ❑OWNER O PURCHASER ❑LESSEE ❑OTHER: 4.NAME,ADDRESS,AND PHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER(S),IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT: 5.LOCATION(STREET ADDRESS,INCLUDING CITY,COUNTY AND ZIP CODE,WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY EXISTS OR WILL OCCUR) WATERBODY TRIBUTARY OF 1/4 SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE GOVERNMENT LOT SHORELINE DESIGNATION ZONING DESIGNATION TAX PARCEL NO.: DNR STREAM TYPE,IF KNOWN Application Page 1 of 4 6. DESCRIBE THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY,AND STRUCTURES EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY. IF ANY PORTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY IS ALREADY COMPLETED ON THIS PROPERTY,INDICATE MONTH AND YEAR OF COMPLETION. IS THE PROPERTY AGRICULTURAL LAND?❑YES❑NO ARE YOU A USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANT? ❑YES❑NO 7a. DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED WORK COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR ALL WORK WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR 7b.DESCRIBE THE PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED WORK 7c. DESCRIBE THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO CHARACTERISTIC USES OF THE WATER BODY. THESE USES MAY INCLUDE FISH AND AQUATIC LIFE,WATER QUALITY,WATER SUPPLY,RECREATION,and AESTHETICS. IDENTIFY PROPOSED ACTIONS TO AVOID,MINIMIZE,AND MITIGATE DETRIMENTAL IMPACTS,AND PROVIDE PROPER PROTECTION PREPARATION OF DRAWINGS: SEE APPENDIX A-SAMPLE DRAWINGS AND CHECKLIST FOR COMPLETING THE DRAWINGS. ONE SET OF ORIGINAL OR GOOD QUALITY REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS MUST BE ATTACHED. NOTE: APPLICANTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROJECT SITE,BUT THESE DO NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR DRAWINGS. THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND COAST GUARD REQUIRE DRAWINGS ON 8.112 X 11 INCH SHEETS. LARGER DRAWINGS MAYBE REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES 8.WILL THE PROJECT BE CONSTRUCTED IN STAGES? ❑YES ❑NO PROPOSED STARTING DATE: ESTIMATED DURATION OF ACTIVITY: Application Page 2 of 4 9.CHECK IF ANY STRUCTURES WILL BE PLACED: ❑WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE FOR FRESH OR TIDAL WATERS;AND/OR ❑WATERWARD OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE IN TIDAL WATERS 10.WILL FILL MATERIAL(ROCK,FILL,BULKHEAD,PILINGS OR OTHER MATERIAL)BE PLACED: ❑WATERWARD OF THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OR LINE FOR FRESH WATERS? IF YES,VOLUME(CUBIC YARDS) /AREA (ACRES ❑WATERWARD OF THE MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER FOR TIDAL WATERS? IF YES,VOLUME(CUBIC YARDS) !AREA (ACRES) 11.WILL MATERIAL BE PLACED IN WETLANDS? ❑YES ❑NO IF YES: A.IMPACTED AREA IN ACRES: B.HAS A DELINEATION BEEN COMPLETED? IF YES,PLEASE SUBMIT WITH APPLICATION. ❑YES ❑NO C.HAS A WETLAND REPORT BEEN PREPARED? IF YES,PLEASE SUBMIT WITH APPLICATION. ❑YES ❑NO D.TYPE AND COMPOSITION OF FILL MATERIAL(E.G.,SAND,ETC.): E.MATERIAL SOURCE: F.LIST ALL SOIL SERIES(TYPE OF SOIL)LOCATED AT THE PROJECT SITE,S INDICATE IF THEY ARE ON THE COUNTYS LIST OF HYDRIC SOILS. SOILS INFORMATION CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE(MRCS): 12.WILL PROPOSED ACTIVITY CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS? ❑YES ❑NO IF YES,IMPACTED AREA IS _ACRES 13.WILL EXCAVATION OR DREDGING BE REQUIRED IN WATER OR WETLANDS? ❑YES ❑NO IF YES: A.VOLUME:_(CUBIC YARDS)/AREA_(ACRES) B.COMPOSITION OF MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED: C.DISPOSAL SITE FOR EXCAVATED MATERIAL: D.METHOD OF DREDGING: 14.LIST OTHER APPLICATIONS,APPROVALS,OR CERTIFICATIONS FROM OTHER FEDERAL,STATE OR LOCAL AGENCIES FOR ANY STRUCTURES,CONSTRUCTION,DISCHARGES, OR OTHER ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED IN THE APPLICATION Q.E.,PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL,HEALTH DISTRICT APPROVAL,BUILDING PERMIT,SEPA REVIEW,FERC LICENSE, FOREST PRACTICES APPLICATION,ETC.)ALSO INDICATE WHETHER WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND INDICATE ALL EXISTING WORK ON DRAWINGS. TYPE OF APPROVAL ISSUING AGENCY IDENTIFICATION NO. DATE OF APPLICATION DATE APPROVED COMPLETED? SEPA LEAD AGENCY SEPA DECISION: SEPA DECISION DATE: 15. HAS ANY AGENCY DENIED APPROVAL FOR THE ACTIVITY DESCRIBED HEREIN OR FOR ANY ACTIVITY DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE ACTIVITY DESCRIBED HEREIN?❑YES ❑NO IF YES,EXPLAIN: Application Page 3 of 4 A SECTION B-Use for Shoreline and Corps of Engineers permits only: 16. TOTAL COST OF PROJECT. THIS MEANS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE PROJECT,INCLUDING MATERIALS,LABOR,MACHINE RENTALS,ETC. 17. LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH JURISDICTION: 18. FOR CORPS,COAST GUARD,AND DNR PERMITS,PROVIDE NAMES,ADDRESSES,AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS,LESSEES,ETC.PLEASE NOTE: SHORELINE MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL NOTICE—CONSULT YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER SECTION C -This section MUST be completed for any permit covered by this application. 19. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR A PERMIT OR PERMITS TO AUTHORIZE THE ACTIVITIES DESCRIBED HEREIN. I CERTIFY THAT I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION,AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF,SUCH INFORMATION IS TRUE,COMPLETE,AND ACCURATE. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I POSSESS THE AUTHORITY TO UNDERTAKE THE PROPOSED ACTIVITIES::I HEREBY GRANT OTHE AGENCIES TO WHICH THIS APPLICATION IS MADE,THE RIGHT TO ENTER THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED LOCATION TO INSPECT THE PROPOSED IN-PROGRESS OR COMPLETED WORK I AGREE TO START WORK ONLY AFTER ALL NECESSARY PERMITS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT DATE I HEREBY DESIGNATE TO ACT AS MY AGENT IN MATTERS RELATED TO THIS APPLICATION FOR PERMIT(S). I UNDERSTAND THAT IF A FEDERAL PERMIT IS ISSUED,I MUST SIGN THE PERMIT. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER(EXCEPT PUBLIC ENTITY LANDOWNERS,E.G.DNR) DATE THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SIGNED BY THE APPLICANT AND THE AGENT,IF AN AUTHORIZED AGENT IS DESIGNATED. 18 U.S.0§1001 provides that Whoever,in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies,conceals,or covers up by any trick,scheme,or device a material fact or makes any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false,fictitious,or fraudulent statement or entry,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. CQMPLETE0 9 LDCAL�0.FF10 ;::. ..,.....::.::..::::;::....;.; ,...:. ., in ;:stich:as: IfilYlr>: :talEe':te rtt.;marsl ' ►...''= tr i `.:> oa . fit:;:>:.Nature o€ti l�>e..... f7or irle ; :Q............. :>. :::..: : tlor.. €.....,................................,.. ± rr ::.::::::.::::.g::::.::.......... ........ ...:.:;:::::::p.::::.......... Mir°<:I10 dwa::>::c1 to: e::.0,6eat<>a cc or :::erasion,; i n..:':; tr k:car E#Ik .mate at such a s�Ir d, ra el,.: �.: d mud #ki,"aa......y.�},. .. :::::::.�:::::::::::::.:.�:::: .;;..,........................................................:.:..:::::::.:.:::::::::::::.:.:.:...........................................:. v..eryi:thlat:an :: t e .o f33ed uiltl t� s cr..;stta s#res:.vu t: tceed;a::.n , ltt . f trtj!fi eet above# iv�srage radi.. " > :#tt:t ............................ .........:: .t ::. ..........:::.:.:::::.::.g........................................:..:.::.::::::::::.::.:... .:::::::::::::::......::.....................:::..:::...:..:::.:.:....::::::.: ... ....:. .......... ::::.::::::.::.::::.:.::.:::::.::::::.:.:::: ..:::::<:.:..:.:::.:::.::: :::.::. .:.::::::.:::::::::..:::::::::.:::::::.:.:::: ... ;.:.... .::.:::. :.. : ... ...:... ............ ... ii l t :a.`....... o ation and+gum rest r,t a ws s,a €sti#s nd potential .that yvltl have an.> bs r ted p�. e that. :::::::>: :.>::>::::>::::::::>::::::>:.::: : : .::::.. :...... .:lf#he::a 1ic�::tt +al :: t id usenaroe,st;>`ork :in full iha porX. # .: :.prugram;w#t; #�ro <>.s ::.;;:ihe o .tase .0 e::rne a cond>ticna .�.pr*i>..the oase;cf avartance, from v ice# a is ........::.;:.;;1 :.;:p:.;:.;;... Y;:::.::..:.: .:::. ;:.;:.;:.; ::.;:.:.:.; These Agencies are Equal Opportunity and Atf n naUve Action employers. For special accommodation needs,please contact the appropriate agency from Appendix S. Application Page 4 of 4 APPENDIX A: GUIDANCE CHECKLIST FOR COMPLETION OF DRAWINGS General Information. Three types of illustrations are needed to properly depict the proposed activity: Vicinity Map, Plan View, and Cross-Sectional View. Drawings to scale should be prepared using clear printing, black ink, and the fewest number of sheets possible. Include the scale. The importance of clear accurate drawings cannot be overstated. At a minimum, drawings must contain the following information; other information may be required depending on project type. If you have questions regarding completing the drawings, call the appropriate agency. 1. Vicinity Map. A copy of a county or city road map, or a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map may be used. Include: ( ) a. North arrow. ( ) b. Name of waterbody(and river mile if appropriate). ( ) C. Location of the proposed activity(indicate with a circle, arrow, X, or similar symbol). ( ) d. Provide latitude and longitude of the site to the nearest second. ( ) e. Provide directions to the site. 2. Plan View. This drawing illustrates the proposed project area as if you were looking down at the site from overhead. ( ) a. North arrow. ( ) b. Name of waterbody and direction of water flow. ( ) C. Location of existing shoreline. Tidal Waters: Show the Ordinary High, Mean High, Mean Low, Mean Higher High, and Mean Lower Low Water Marks or Lines, and/or wetland boundaries. Indicate elevation above datum. Non-tidal waters: Show the Ordinary High Water Mark or Line, Meander Line, and/or wetland boundary. ( ) d. Dimensions of the activity or structure and impervious surfaces, distance from property lines, and the distance it extends into the waterbody beyond the Ordinary High, Mean High, Mean Higher High, and Mean Low Water Mark or Line, and/or wetland boundaries, as appropriate. ( ) e. For Corps permits, indicate the distance to Federal projects and/or navigation channels(if applicable). To ascertain, call the Corps Regulatory Branch Office at(206)764-3495. ( ) f. Show existing structures on subject and adjoining properties. ( ) g. Indicate adjoining property ownership. ( ) h. If fill material is to be placed, identify the type of material, amount of material (cubic yards), and area to be filled (acres). ( ) i. If project involves dredging, identify the type of material, amount of material(cubic yards), area to be dredged, method of dredging, and location of disposal site. Dredging in areas shallower than -10 feet needs to be clearly identified on drawings. ( ) j. Identify any part of the activity that has been completed. ( ) k. Indicate types and location of aquatic, wetland, and riparian vegetation. ( ) I. Erosion control measures, stabilization of disturbed areas, etc. ( ) M. Utilities, including water, sanitary sewer, power and stormwater conveyance systems(e.g., bioswales). ( ) n. Indicate stormwater discharge points. 3. Cross-Sectional View. This drawing illustrates the proposed activity as if it were cut from the side and/or front. Include: ( ) a. Location of water lines. Tidal Waters: Show the Ordinary High, Mean High, Mean Higher High, and Mean Lower Low Water Marks or Lines, and/or wetland boundary. Non-tidal waters: Show the Ordinary High Water Mark or Line, and/or wetland boundary. ( ) b. Water depth or tidal elevation at waterward face of project. ( ) C. Dimensions of the activity or structure, and the distance it extends into the waterbody beyond the Ordinary High, the Mean High, the Mean Higher High and Mean Low Water Mark or Line, and/or wetland boundaries. ( ) d. Indicate dredge and/or fill grades as appropriate. ( ) e. Indicate existing and proposed contours and elevations. ( ) f. Indicate types and location of aquatic, wetland, and riparian vegetation present on site. ( ) g. Indicate type and location of material used in construction and method of construction. O h. Indicate height of structure. 4. Clearance and Elevations. Applies to Coast Guard Bridge Permits only. ( ) a. Vertical clearance measured from Mean Higher(tidal waters)or Ordinary High (non-tidal water). ( ) b. Horizontal clearance between piers or pilings. ( ) C. Bottom elevation of the waterway at the bridge. Appendix A-1 • 1 PIES . \`• \ t ,PFCPOSS � P64CT CN \ LDE OF O.H.Y. AT `\`.0� \ \%,,FACE OF SAJN D co 3 E)QSTINB PRR TO BE FIENVED \ \ Y PFa"m • pI13i �\ •\ �� PfIGP'Q9ED 1 37-0'0' FLOAT �C \ ' PFCPOSED SLR . . L:OWBOAT PIATFU:M ` 3D - 4' 1EIa13OEtS PFQPOSE0 6' .` I PIER ADDITION \` rr EXISTm --------------J PnR PLAN VIEW 0 20 40 60 00 100 . ~ NOTE: EaSTINB PIER TO BE FEMM I/ WV PIER TO BE LOCATED ON SOUV 92DE OF N � TO MEDINA BELLEVUE � �. Q N L LL' LAT: 4r3544' LEGAL DESCRIPTION LON:122°14'44' GX LOT-8 BLD - PUTT-Fa AIM ADO Toe � N M� FiOAIM ADO SItl: _ SS ON 8 LN 194.55 FT Y OF SE CDR TR TH N 18 DES 53 MlN CO SEE E 30 FT TH 72 DES 55 )UN 00 SEC r TO LK YASli TH SLY ALB Lx TO S LN OF 8 TH E TO BEB I - 90 MElKER LOT-7-8 BLOCK- PLAT-RDAFCKE ADO POR BB SE COR 8 THY ALB S LH LAKE ISLAND 194.56 FT TH N 18 DM 53 MIH 00 SS E WASHINGTON �4' 30 FT TO TP08 TH Cage N 18 CS 53 MIN 00 SE: E 50 FT TH N 63 DEB 18 MIN 00 SEC r TO LK WASH TH SLY ALB LK.TO PT x.72 DEG 55 MIN 00 SEC Y OF c o, w TRUE EES THTO 7PCB �S� 56 MI11 00 SSE 4J;� VICINITY MAP NO SCALE 4� PIFl"COE:PHOYIDE PRIYATE BUT MOORAGE PROPOSES: FEWYE AND REPLACE EXISTING PIER Y/ WW PIER DATUK: C.O.E. 0.0' EST 1919 AT NEW LOCATION ZTAC&a PROPERTY OVH31S: 96 NAP£: Ix:U40: YASKMTON V;Okt FW%*" 70B ADORE SS: M544 5 3ut AT: MMCM I9LAFD 1152- 5"t$r,Aera lr Ittr. - Altratf XUA---d COUNTY OF•KIND STATE:YASHDOTON �t iR2 59 Mugu I�1 1 KkILIN3 ADDRESS: Am. BY:Tohn^y.7u rr.�-Up PAGE- I OF 3 DATE- 8/29/89 P�/CIN� �,,�APMJ � A-2 1 1 / LO*OJT PLAT}( E' W FLOAT z ' 38'- t0' 4'- o" i 2 i 79'- 2 yr 1 i PIER PLAN o to t EXISTING PIETA TO BE F@10YED 1V NEW � PD31 TO BE LOCATED ON SOUTH SIDE of PACPE3TY. EXISTI►3 rOOD BUL*EAD TO BE FBOYED AND EEPLACED ttCER SEPARATE PGfKIT. t 1 PFCPOSED DJJQEAD ►EPtJCE?£3(T UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT i 79 - 2' LIE OF O.H.v. AT , 1 2'- 0' 23.85' EXISTM BUJQEQ . LAX J BOTTOM ELEVATION VIEW PROPOSED:REMOVE AND FEPUCc o ►o i EXISTING PIER V/ NEW PIER AT NEW LOCATION D1:LAM VASKINGTON AT:M3M ISLN0 � 11 CDXrf OF:KD0 STATE:VASKMTON `�-� P LE' rj t TE PLAN MR-'BY: .bkpjgi -up PAGE DATE: 6/2g/d9 a-� • bn� �AJOAO) ZioA;41j. � Ttt-d-V RW:DV cc� /Q /I T \ s brki -:?-Us 3ld W V 9 4 ��► ?1�sbrn s ��. ��`Y� � a • O 31 �4 WO a Nlbo � 3 �N C I t � V Oo ) Sft.tov5' STOsQ./d1 W�C(7s� L�o I .. t L rj SVJAt-G WATL-r, MARS C p OSS 36CF7"S ! O' THURSTON COUNTY - - -- — - - - . LEWIS COUNTY -------� eau: CREEK J V.1 0 x C E N T R A L I A }- i�'Se G C R�Qp Y l T� gig G0eli �Z e HATCHERY CHEHALIS E . a ® �oea SOUTH WELL FIELD NAPAVINE 4� MC)SSYRUCK z MARY'S CORNER �k� /�• , r ETHEL SAINT URBAN ~ J v cr- '� MAYFIELD w WINLOCK ~ z RIVER MAYFIELD DAM 0 Z. HATCHERY SIT£ TOLEDO LAT: S+b° a,4' 3(,~ LEWIS COUNTY COWLITZ COUNTY STATUTE MILES 5 0 S i �rlCrlJ17*`-I - t- OCATIONNICINITY MAP FIGURE D A-(-) r r t.OG4Tlo ti1� 1 1/7 4 � ,a7 wETt_ANp Fit.►. (1J•3 Ac� � 2 a,i N 3D wETLaJ�7 E�ccavATicSN (3.7Ac� t ( / 1 ADTi2cEN` �R.o'�ER7y Ow.J6.�5; IN 1J.5. ��oai AT S�HN PVA�S COUNTY OF STATE APPLICATION BY SHEET OF DATE A L tza � Ott ♦` G¢A 13E \ N N w p cteT o9� n FILL • OuDA71'a�_ ` s \ at oAlDtlr,g 4Dila»6-� to pri 10 Seri r" •N on on u• 4" •Y &M H• 4• w N • M W WO •+• w •e0 ♦a• woe SECTION A—A 3. ' ``'��' fiX�ST..�G /'�0:10tttig Mtlttartd '. ��-Genfle G,'tprcpo®a t�elvnslo„ �Ret�SED \ - 6Ralg » •.4 rxv 040 SY KO 4" 420 •ea 000 240 "a R• Y • •• M N• to DN CD OIO SECT=B-tS 6RPOH Dr*:Cocsd 18 ' •0 40 i Z•➢osFb t ras AMA 7tlatlflp n•tl"d rC to �exlST-i.w) •9i •ii KO 7N ,}0 NO •0• NO t00 •20 3.1 ae'! •N tFf Vi N • �! t99 )W 3a0 •e• De• O2• SECTION C-C PROPOSM FILL N AT COLNry ar £TAM WA M1llcAnox vy .. /p �-b .ram � nLao tL '~ R�Wrdth ,�- 3,d i _—_Pfmo-Y-11rr .._ � Df DQSLNrt1C ` Pev�ide77ar r`a��sdtq: � . 1. L.ocafkm of OM CFJ llff 4-/ Onfh=OCC4,HC4 rx PXl!!WIq �cm f°Ratir4krn ,C1LLVY- o to — 'r-� _ _ _ _ —•j-- • O.V ro asfe, _ �?zr7 Tz�4� CA r p Ys Z, 77--Tjpe of i'loidion . TCf d Lovfh �. Pe=,fagc Of Or Plod?W Wkv&Cvnd Oaf t&17 the - - Pcoch Ar=(&o;,c Cdn,-&LcwWde,) TheTrpe and Lordr..,or h. Aq,dk erg/crWcff,-d Vcgd dion S. N b n,crd rypt or Poi,q. FWff WNFARRAMN COUNTY OF TNiAN EXAA9� IS AN OF.THE INFORMATION R'£QUIRED APFUCATiON VY ...�.. P OYME' DiUMSiONS.DETAU & SPECMICATIOPiS t'r�pJF.C'P ADDRESS: -- As Avrmp n FoR Pnofosz® PRojzcT. SHEET OF DATE wArEP I ' Na+urc! i FirTroc to �I • I P WI r=o'e tlr� Ndurd oarx�tlr� TlddCkvdlon/t+Toe \ o(Wdcroo,d Face CT7LLW-ODPtJ Nu4xd ocach S Grc.Jc Dc h a(®anc P.cc# o Nc�u�d . ProvideThc Fo(Jaorrx�: oca- adc Dl�tancz FroriWdcrward Fax L of om t titio V on occo, To Toc of Ndvrd oo•4tirc ®an{or Csl�tlrkj oork Prded" 7YPC P AA-IV WNFA5WArION D4 r4--,r. ,� COUNTY OF ^_ THIS IS M EXAS,IPLE OF THE [f;FOR@.{.OTION REQUIRED APPLICATION QY PROJECT ADDRESS: PROVIDE DIWENSIONS.DETAILS & SPECIFICATI IS AS APPROPRIATE M0 PROPOSED PROJECT. SHEET OF DOTE F'+ APPENDIX B: AGENCY CONTACTS Below is a list of agencies to which a copy of the Joint Application may be sent, and which permit each agency issues. Technical assistance and information is also available from these offices. Department of the Army Permit(Section 404 or Section 10) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Telephone(206)764-3495 Seattle District FAX(206)764-6602 Regulatory Branch Post Office Box 3755 Seattle, WA 98124-2255 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone(509)238-4570 Eastern Washington Information FAX(509)238-4570 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone(509)682-7010 Central Washington Information FAX(509)682-7710 Department of Ecology Permits(401 and Approval to Exceed Water Quality Standards) Washington State Department of Ecology Telephone(360)407-7037 300 Desmond Drive FAX(360)407-6904 Post Office Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Central Region Telephone(509)558-2800 FAX(509)550-2809 Eastern Region Telephone(509)545-2926 FAX(509) 595-6175 Northwest Region Telephone(206)354-7000 FAX(206)354-7098 Southwest Region Telephone(360)407-6300 FAX(360)407-6305 Department of Fish and Wildlife(Hydraulic Project Approval)-Submit all HPA applications to Headquarters. Contact regional offices for questions or assistance. Headquarters Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone(360)902-2534 600 Capitol Way North TDD(360)902-2207 Olympia, Washington 98501-1091 FAX(360)902-2946 Region 1 (Pend Oreille, Ferry, Stevens, Spokane, Lincoln, Whitman, Columbia, Garfield, Asotin, and Walla Walla Counties) Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone(509)456-4082 Region 1 FAX(509)456-4071 8702 North Division Street Spokane, WA 99218-1199 Region 2(Okanogan, Douglas, Grant, Adams, and Franklin Counties) Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone(509)7544624 Region 2 FAX(509)754-5257 1550 Alder Street NW Ephrata, WA 98823-9652 Appendix B-1 Region 3(Chelan, Kittitas, Yakima, and Benton Counties) Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone(509)575-2740 Region 3 FAX(509)575-2474 1701 South 24th Avenue Yakima, WA 98902-5720 Region 4(Whatcom, Skagit, Snohomish, King, Pierce, Island, and San Juan Counties) Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone(206)775-311 Region 4 FAX(206)338-1066 16019 Mill Creek Boulevard Mill Creek, WA 98012-1296 Region 5(Lewis,Wahkiakum, Cowlitz, Skamania, Clark, and Klickitat Counties) Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone(306)696-6211 Region 5 FAX(360)690-7238 5404 NE Hazel Dell Ave. Vancouver, WA 98663-1299 Region 6(Pacific, Thurston, Grays Harbor, Mason, Jefferson, Clallam, and Kitsap Counties) Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone(360)249-6522 Region 6 FAX(360)664-0689 48 Devonshire Road Montesano, WA 98563-9618 Local Government(Shoreline Management Act Approval) Appropriate City or County Planning, Building, or Community Development Department Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS), formerly Soil Conservation Service(SCS)for information regarding activities on agricultural land) NRCS Telephone(509)353-2335 Suite 450 Rock Point Tower Two West 316 Boone Avenue Spokane, WA 99201-2348 Coast Guard (Section 9 Bridge Permit) Commander 13th Coast Guard District(OAN) Telephone(206)220-7282 915 Second Avenue Seattle,WA 98174-1067 Attn: Austin Pratt Department of Natural Resources Aquatic Resources regarding authorization to use bedlands,tidelands, or shorelands of navigable waters. Central Region Telephone(360)748-2383 Northwest Region Telephone(360)856-3500 Southwest Region Telephone(360)577-2025 South Puget Sound Region Telephone(360)825-1631 Northeast Region Telephone(590) 925-8510 Southeast Region Telephone(509)925-8510 Olympic Region Telephone(360)374-6131 Headquarters Telephone(360)902-1100 Appendix B-2 LLAA INTERFUND TRANSFER Transfer Number: Date: 7y 2 V, Z0,0 If General Descri ,ion• / /� / Q /1iaJJ,��/� a�oh �Ou�l c C'-+0'f f A' -(N bzrnj Department To Be Charged (Transfer Out-From) Lec Description Account Number WO/Function Amount f n/✓l,t oNrjEN rML CAC4(kI 1 S T �I/.OUD60O,OJT S9bO.Gb38.6 q`yb '.�� Shovel;Ne F:l iN Fee- 4,?10"00.018,590-038.0 F.R / o00 o �{4 Department Authorization: / y her t�;3 ur pfojrf# )lumber. Department To Be Credited (Transfer In - To) V),)n,,OM t-4 Description Account Number WO/Function Amount Up r 2S v d o 1 Distribution: White: Finance Department Yellow: Department to be Charged Pink: Department to be Credited CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Printed: 07-26-2001 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA01-105 Payment Made: 07/26/2001 12:51 PMReceipt Number: R0104357 Total Payment: 1,522.44 Payee: INTERFUND TRANSFER Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount ------ ------------------ ------------------------------ ---------------- 5010 000.345. 81.00 .0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 1, 000 . 00 5955 000.05.519.90 .42 . 1 Postage 22 .44 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount ---------- -------- --------------------------- --------------- Payment Other 1,522 .44 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due -- --= ------------------ ------------------------------ --------------- 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.345. 81.00.0002 Annexation Fees .00 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers .00 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat .00 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees . 00 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review . 00 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat .00 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat . 00 5013 000.345.81.00.0010 PUD . 00 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees . 00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment .00 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks . 00 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone . 00 5018 000.345 .81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt . 00 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev . 00 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval . 00 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Special Permit Fees . 00 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees . 00 5023 000.345.81.00.0020 Other Misc Planning/Zone . 00 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee . 00 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend . 00 5909 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies . 00 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) . 00 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits . 00 5955 000.05.519.90.42 .1 Postage . 00 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax . 00 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: August 1, 2001 RECEIVED To: Gary Schimek/SurfaceWster Utility AUG - 2 2001CITY OF RENTON From: Elizabeth Higgins/Development Planning i( k UTILITY SYSTEMS Subject: Maplewood Golf Course Regrade Project No. LUA-01-105,ECF,SM The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has received the above-referenced application for environmental review. A presentation of the proposed amendment to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) is scheduled for August 21, 2001. Following the ERC meeting, I will send you copies of the ERC determination along with the timeframes for the public comment and appeal periods for your files. Please provide a charge number for the publication of the environmental determination. ACCEPTANCE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL AND SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REVIEW Total Processing Determination of Time Approximately Complete 16 weeks Application & Mailing& Posting of Notice of Public Environmental Local Decision DOE Application& Threshold Decision Published Government Sent to Appeal Comment Review Receipt of Optional DNS* Period Environmental & Notices Mailed Shoreline Dept.of Period Period Application Ends Determination and Posted Decision Ecology Ends PP DOE Ends Appeal Staff Review/ Period Report Appeal Period** Appeal to SHB*** Due Approx. 7 Days before ** Approx. 21 Days 21 Days 14 Days Y 7 Days 14 Days 3' Y 7- Days Environmental ]] 7 Days JJJ 27 Tetermination Au/ Thu r� Fri City staff or other agencies may request ' * For projects not requiring an FiZi additional information during the review environmental impact statement and decision making process. It is important that the applicant submit the ** If the Threshold Environmental requested material quickly to avoid delays /L Determination contains different mitigation in the process. Any time spent gathering conditions than those included in the optional data and/or additional city review period is Y DNS notice, this time is increased to 29 days to not included in the above chart and will accommodate an additional 15-day period in increase the time required to process the advance of the appeal period. application. *** Shoreline Hearing Board forms/pw/ds/procedure/0034.abc/bh 09/2000 R()W LG ¢- f a/'.SL//sf W� en yov aie STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project: y2_O q Q ' o-, v Maplewood Golf Course Regrade / �'C 2. Name of applicant: psi City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: City of Renton Engine Administration—Fifth Floor Gray& Osborne, Inc. 1055 South Grady Way 701 Dexter Ave. N. #200 Renton, WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98109 Gary Schimek,P.E. Roger Kuykendall,P.E. Surface Water Utility Project Engineer Project Engineer (206)284-0860 (425)430-7205 4. Date checklist prepared: July 6, 2001 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Washington 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable): Construction is expected to begin in September 2001 and be complete by October 31, 2001. 7. Plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal: No plans for future additions. 8. Environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal: No known previous environmental information. Page 1 of 12 9. Applications that are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal: None known 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for the proposal: City of RentonJLarufUse Master Pent A�plication 11. Brief, complete description of the proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site: The purpose of this project is to regrade approximately 300 lineal yards of rough and fairway area on the Maplewood Golf Course. The regraded area will serve as a berm to protect against the floods in excess of the current 100-year flow as determined by FEMA. The berm will also be used as a cart path for Hole Number 3 of the golf course. Landscaping will be included to soften the visual appearance of the berm and provide golf course feature. 12. Location of the proposal,including street address, if any, and section, township, and range: Provide a legal description, site plan,vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. Portions of Maplewood Golf Course Hole Number 3 located adjacent to the Cedar River and north of Maple Valley Highway(SR 169). A vicinity map is attached to this document and a site plan will be provided under Part 10 of the City of Renton's Environmental Review Application. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling,hilly,steep slopes, mountainous, other Hole Number 3 is relatively flat. The banks of the Cedar River are steep slopes. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? The steepest slopes on the site within the project boundary are approximately 25% and are located at the bank of the Cedar River. - 1,L ww V- Is o- gar of + f c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Puyallup fine sandy loam is the native soil. Soil amendments have probably occurred as part of the golf course construction. Page 2 of 12 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There is no evidence of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity. Sluffing of riverbanks has occurred on several occasions during high water events, in areas upstream of the project site. In 1998 the riverbank immediately adjacent to the project site was repaired after significant erosion occurred during a high flow event. e. Describe the purpose,type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Construction of the berm will require approximately 3,500 cubic yards of free- draining structural fill. Topsoil and quarry spalls will be used in addition to the structural fill. The City of Renton will approve all fill material prior to placement. Fill will be 100% imported. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction,or use? There is potential for erosion to occur during of construction. Erosion will be controlled utilizing Best Management Practices(BMPs)in accordance with City of Renton standards. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No new impervious surface area will be added to the project site after construction. The existing cart path (asphalt)will be replaced in kind. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The Contractor shall employ Best Management Practices to minimize the effects of erosion. The continual use of straw bales, silt fencing, etc. shall be required during construction, as required by the contract. In addition,the project may be temporarily"shut down"during times of inclement weather conditions. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. Normal exhaust emissions from construction equipment,both diesel and gas operated equipment, is expected during construction. Dust may be emitted during Page 3of12 the construction of the project. Methods shall be employed on-site as needed to control any fugitive dust problems. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: The construction contract will include provisions for dust control during construction. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Cedar River is located within 100 feet of the project site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. Construction of the berm will be located just beyond the top of bank of the Cedar River. See the attached site plan for further details. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of rill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No Page 4 of 12 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None proposed. The contractor shall employ the necessary measures to ensure that no construction runoff enters the Cedar River. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. Some dewatering is anticipated due to groundwater seepage to the areas being excavated. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any; describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None anticipated C. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Runoff from the project area will be controlled using City of Renton Best Management Practices to ensure that no construction runoff enters the Cedar River. Storm water will be the only source of runoff. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Even with the use of BMPs, some sediment originating from erosion could enter the watercourses downstream from the project. With proper erosion controls this should not occur. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Methods to minimize and mitigate construction related erosion will be provided in design and within the contract documents. Methods include the use of silt fence and straw bales to entrap migrating silt on site and the placing of filter fabric over catch basins to restrict silt from entering the existing storm system. All exposed areas shall be seeded and mulched upon completion. 4. Plants Page 5 of 12 a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen,other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other(not within construction limits) X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass,milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some turf and landscaping will be removed or altered as part of the construction. It is possible that a few large maples may be removed as part of the construction. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known � d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: All areas exposed will be landscaped per the architect's landscaping plan. 5. Animals a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No known species C. Iss the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not known d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The proposed project will not significantly alter the existing conditions of the site. 6. Energy and Natural Resources Page 6 of 12 a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas, oil,wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Oil, gas, and diesel fuel will be consumed by machinery during construction. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: No C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Yes. Oil, gas, and diesel fuel leaks from machinery during construction. The contractor shall implement the necessary measures to clean-up any spills or leaks. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation,other)? Traffic on Maple Valley Highway(SR 169). 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term noise from machinery during working hours will occur during the course of construction. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Page 7 of 12 Working hours will be established by the contract limiting working hours to those set by ordinance. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently used as a public golf course. Land uses adjacent to the project site are residential or commercial. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? Is so, describe. No C. Describe any structures on the site. Underground utilities consist of storm drainage pipes and catch basins and irrigation pipes. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Recreational Open Space f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? City of Renton Recreational Open Space g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Page 8 of 12 None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Not applicable 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not applicable b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The berm will be landscaped following construction. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None Page 9 of 12 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Maplewood Golf Course, Cedar River b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national,state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable 14. Transportation Page 10 of 12 a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. Maple Valley Highway(SR 169) b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No change in parking would occur. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No additional traffic generation is anticipated. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Construction will take place in a timely manner to minimize disturbance to traffic flow through the various street corridor(s). Traffic control through the construction area will be required by contract. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increase need for public services (for example, fire protection, police protection, health care,schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The contract documents will include provisions for maintaining existing utility service. The Contractor shall be required to locate all existing utilities and Page 11 of 12 coordinate all construction activities with all affected utility companies during the construction phase. 16. Utilities a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas, water, refuse service,telephone, sanitary sewer, television cable, septic system, other. Storm drainage, golf course irrigation b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: Page 12 of 12 STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning /Building /Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 Project Name: Maplewood Golf Course Regrade Applicant: City of Renton Surface Water Utility Contact: Gary Schimek, PE File Number: LUA--01-105, AM, EC Reviewing Planner: Elizabeth Higgins Project Description: The purpose of this project is to regrade a section of the Maplewood Golf Course to provide protection from potential Cedar River flood flows that would be in excess of the 100 year flow (i.e. 1 in 100 chance of occurring any given year) as adopted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The proposed project includes grading and landscaping along Hole Number 3. A section of the existing cart path will be demolished and subsequently replaced along the top of the regraded area. The berm has been designed to match left bank (facing downstream) river bank elevations prior to the November 1995 and February 1996 flood events. As a result of these flood events, the right bank elevation was lowered by about 3.5 feet. This project will restore the pre-existing level of flood protection to the Maplewood Golf Course and adjacent Maplewood Neighborhood. Due to the proximity of the project to the Cedar River, a Shoreline Substantial Development permit will be required. Project Location: Maplewood Golf Course, Hole Number 3 Site Area Hole Number 3 of the Maplewood Golf Course is adjacent to the right bank (facing downstream) of the Cedar River. All construction will occur within the rough area between the river bank and fairway. The project footprint is about 500 feet long by 18 feet wide. No construction work will take place on the banks of the Cedar River. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: Project Location Map report-ERC.doc City of /B/PW Department nvirun al v� �o e a port Ced ♦ nookSalmon Spawning Gravel Supplementation C ITY V �l`�41 ECF REIMCH la, z000 Planning/Building/Public Works Departm6ntof 2 Jesse Tanner,kQETERMINATION OF L �I�ify90'1�� •�Administrator l Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES: The City of Renton Development Services Division proposes the following mitigation measures: 1. The following erosion control measures will be required annually during and following construction: a. Install and maintain temporary erosion control measures for unpaved road, parking, or disturbed areas. b. Minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. c. Place silt fencing along areas abutting the Cedar River for the duration of the project. d. Following construction, contractor will revegetate disturbed sloped areas. 2. Soil on site shall be kept moist, as necessary, during the period of the project implementation to reduce airborne dust. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following note is supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. The SEPA determination is for placement of spawning gravel located as described in the project proposal submitted. If the location for the work changes substantially beyond the location as described, a new application must be made. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: Construction of the berm will require approximately 4,400 cubic yards of free-draining structural fill. Topsoil will be used in addition to the structural fill. Mitigation Measures: The following erosion control measures will be required during and following construction: a. Install and maintain temporary erosion control measures for unpaved road, parking, or disturbed areas. b. Minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. c. Place silt fencing along downslope areas abutting the Cedar River for the duration of the project. d. Following construction, contractor will revegetate disturbed sloped areas. pntG Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations reps— 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 1ti ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer }��L eiA City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Cedar River Chinook Salmon Spawning Gravel Supplementation LUA-00-022,ECF REPORT OF MARCH 14, 2000 Page3 of 3 2. Air Impacts: During the project, dust and emissions from trucks and equipment are anticipated. Dirt on construction vehicle tires may be carried off site and thereby increase air pollution at local roads. Watering of unpaved areas or areas where vegetation has been disturbed may be necessary to reduce impacts of dust. Mitigation Measures: Soil on site shall be kept moist, as necessary, during the period of the project implementation to reduce airborne dust. Nexus: Environmental (SEPA) Ordinance 4. Stormwater Impacts: Erosion control measures will be implemented to control stormwater run-off adjacent to the Cedar River where staging for construction will take place (see Earth section, above). Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. report-ERC.doc CITY OF RENTON ,.LLR Planning/Building/Public Works Department 7 e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator ant° 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 0 This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer en tenri1� CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: JUL,, 3 TO: E((Z' FROM: Karen SUBJECT: New Land Use File Set-Up Please complete the following information to facilitate routing of file and application acceptance. If you have special form requirements or instructions, please write them in the "Comments" section. frwrw.w,w.w.w.wrw�irwiirw,wrw,wrw,uw.w.w.�rwrwiw.w.wrw.w,w,w,w,wrwrw.w,.iwrwsrw.iiw.wrw,wrwrw,w,wrwriwrwrwrwrw.w.wrw.w,wrwrw.w.wrsw.w.w,wrw,w,wrwrirw.wrw..rw..�rw� Project Name: Project Manager: i1Ae ICLCJIMd Cho(-f &U6C I)�g�� ss LUA (File) Number: LUA-01- 16S . SIYI I'( Applicant: Acceptance Date: Gl u t / Zoo / Date Circulation Requested: / , Z o o / Date Comments Due: Work Order Number: �o 3 Function Number: Project Description: e-k rW Kz-t. 2ii a d e- a ro x pye �v o j 11 h 01 lc u�d� Cro/ Crc sue- oSr- wvriG �s �c e•c�c� a-/�i,,,� (�/off a�u�.� �v v�.�c vTe ri r� I-At tea` ��' !�o GjGa,, de,� Site Location: �/at n rn 27-2305Iad17 2 Z Z3o.5,7,o, 0 Afi )1Z-I- tom-,..'sue Site Area: 27 ,30O SG Building Area (gross): e Estimated ERC Date: 21 Zoo i HEX Date: DOT Notification Required: Yes ❑ No A-< Boeing Notification: Yes ❑ Now School District Letter. Yes ❑ No,-W- (Lori Pitzer) i Renton School ❑ Issaquah School ❑ Airport Notification: Yes ElNo� I Comments: i e r /iwiriwiwisieiii�sisiwiiiwioiavoiwiwi®imiei..aieioiviariiii�iirsisiii�-iiiaiiimiiwiwiwi.►iiiii.�iiiwiei.�iiieiwisiwuioisisvwii-iwiwiwiwiwisisiwisiwioriiriiioi�-isisrriwrwiir� Setup �,. teary .�chimek- MaplewoodRegrade A.. i-905 s - ... age1 From: Elizabeth Higgins To: Schimek, Gary Date: Wed, Aug 1, 2001 8:29 AM Subject: Maplewood Regrade LUA01-105 1 received the application yesterday afternoon and deemed it a complete application today. I will be sending you some notations from your application that can be incorporated into the staff report to the Environmental Review Committee. Attached to this memo is the ERC report for the Landsburg project that you can use as a template for the Maplewood project. The comment period ends Aug 15 (2 weeks from today, as required). Jennifer needs review the report. The ERC report is due to Sandi Seeger at noon on 8/16 (which means Jennifer needs to see it before then). The ERC meeting is scheduled for 8/21. 1 will be on vacation after today, until Aug 15th when I will be back in the office. If you have questions, I suggust you speak to Jennifer. Good luck! STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning /Building /Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: March 14, 2000 Project Name: Cedar River Chinook Salmon Spawning Gravel Supplementation Applicant: City of Renton Surface Water Utility Contact: Gary Schimek, PE File Number. LUA-00-022, ECF Reviewing Planner: Elizabeth Higgins Project Location Map ercrpc.doc City of /B/PW Department Envir nmental Review Committee to R ort Ced 'nook Salmon Spawning Gravel Supplementation CITY 6F REIN I ECF RE !!l cx ta, 2000 Planning/Building/Public Works Deparn nt°f 2 Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Project escrtp ton: 1 he proposed project woulci allow placement ot 1,UUU cubic yards ot clean spawning gravel in the Cedar River between river mile 20 and 21, directly downstream of the Landsburg bridge each year for ten (10) to fifteen (15) years. The proposed activit�r would be performed for a duration of approximately three weeks, between June 16 h and August 15th each year. The project would occur outside of the Renton city limits, however Renton, as proponent of the project, is acting as Lead Agency for the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) review of the proposed project, with agreement by King County and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The gravel placement is required mitigation by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 Flood Damage Reduction Project near the mouth of the Cedar River. Permits and approvals required for this project include: • King County Grading Permit with Sensitive Areas review • King County Shorelines Permit • Washington State Fish and Wildlife Hydraulic Project Approval • Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality Certification • Washington State Department of Natural Resources Application for Authorization to Use State-Owned Aquatic Lands • National Marine Fisheries Service/ USFW Section 7 Consultation • USACE Public Notification To access the mitigation area, a narrow ramp would be constructed down the north bank of the Cedar River to the river. The gravel would be placed in a long berm near the center of the river. Due to the limitation on access, actual placement of the gravel would utilize either specialized gravel placement equipment to deliver the gravel to the desired location, or equipment such as a BobcatTM tracked vehicle to form a berm in the river channel. The project proposal includes a monitoring program as follows: Water Quality During placement of the gravel in the channel, water quality readings will be taken downstream of the gravel berm with a turbidity meter to ensure the project is in full compliance with the Department of Ecology Water Quality Certification. Ambient conditions will be monitored at the same frequency and with the same type of meter immediately upstream of the gravel berm. The readings will be taken three times daily during construction activities. The readings will be recorded and submitted to King County Department of Development and Environmental Services and the Department of Ecology for review after completion of the project each year. If, at any time, during implementation the readings exceed 5 NTU over background when the background is 50 NTU or less, or if there is a ten percent increase when the background is 50 NTU or greater(WAC 173-201A), the project will stop immediately, and the source of the turbidity determined. If the turbidity source is from the gravel, either a new gravel source will be located or construction techniques will be altered to reduce turbidity (ie slowing down gravel placement). If the turbidity source is coming from the equipment and/or ramp, the project will stop until proper steps can be taken to ensure sediment control (ie sediment fencing). Presence of Adult Fish Immediately prior to initiating construction, the site will be snorkeled from Landsburg Bridge to approximately 0.5 mile downstream for pre o on or bull trout. If adult fish are located, they will be removed or c prior to initiating the project. The fish may be removed by a bi t erupt.doe 105FN&M fir L itf,NV&MrVffin 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer 70te l {, of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Cedar River Chinook Salmon Spawning Gravel Supplementation LUA-00-022,ECF REPORT OF MARCH 14, 2000 Page3 of 3 Project Location: Cedar River between river mile 20 and 21, directly downstream of the Landsburg bridge Site Area Mid-channel of the Cedar River, in a berm approximately 500 feet long by 18 feet wide by 4 feet high. Approximately 2 feet of the berm will be exposed above the surface of the river(during low flow periods). Slide slopes would be approximately 1:1 horizontal to vertical. Total area would be approximately 0.21 acre. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated(DNS- M) B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. vo Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES: The City of Renton Development Services Division proposes the following mitigation measures: 1. The following erosion control measures will be required annually during and following construction: a. Install and maintain temporary erosion control measures for unpaved road, parking, or disturbed areas. b. Minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. c. Place silt fencing along downslope areas abutting the Cedar River for the duration of the project. d. Following construction, annually, revegetate disturbed sloped areas. 2. Soil on site shall be kept moist, as necessary, during the period of the project implementation to reduce airborne dust. 3. The recommendations of the Draft Biological Assessment(U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, February 14, 2000), or subsequent Final Biological Assessment as approved by the National Marine Fisheries Service, shall be followed prior to, during, and following construction. ercrpt.doc City of Rento P/B/PW Department Environmental Review Committee Staff Re.Ao,-t - Cedif4gMhook Salmon Spawning Gravel Supplententation CITY OF RF, I ECF RE CH 14, 2000 Pa e4 of 4 !!I Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following note is supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. The SEPA determination is for placement of spawning gravel located as described in the project proposal submitted, that is, mid-channel of the Cedar River, between River Mile 20 and River Mile 21. If the location for the work changes substantially beyond the location as described, a new application must be made. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The proposed project will take place primarily in the Cedar River. The amount of material proposed to be placed in the Cedar River over a period of ten to fifteen years is 1,000 cubic yards per year. Trucks and other construction equipment will access the project area from an existing parking lot located west of the Landsburg bridge, on the north side of the Cedar River. A ramp will be constructed from which the mid-channel of the river will be accessed for placement of gravel to form the berm. Due to the proximity of the Cedar River and the sloped river bank, potential for erosion exists near the project site. Therefore, mitigation related to erosion control will be required. Mitigation Measures: The following erosion control measures will be required annually during and following construction: a. Install and maintain temporary erosion control measures for unpaved road, parking, or disturbed areas. b. Minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. c. Place silt fencing along downslope areas abutting the Cedar River for the duration of the project. d. Following construction, annually, revegetate disturbed sloped areas. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 2. Air Impacts: During the project, dust and emissions from trucks and equipment are anticipated. Dirt on construction vehicle tires may be carried off site and thereby increase air pollution at local roads. Watering of unpaved areas or areas where vegetation has been disturbed may be necessary to reduce impacts of dust. Mitigation Measures: Soil on site shall be kept moist, as necessary, during the period of the project implementation to reduce airborne dust. Nexus: Environmental (SEPA) Ordinance 3. Water Impacts: The project site is proposed as mid-channel of the Cedar River, immediately downstream oft urg bridge (between River Mile 20 and River Mile 21) for a distance of approximately 500 feet. The berm would be approximately 500 feet by 25 feet, with a 4 foot high berm having 2 feet of the b ercrpt.doe ---- 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer `"l teii • t ily of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Cedar River Chinook Salmon Spawning Gravel Supplementation LUA-00-022,ECF REPORT OF MARCH 14, 2000 Page5 of 5 surface of the river(during low flow periods). The side slopes of the berm would be 1:1. The total area is approximately 0.21 acre. During construction, water quality monitoring will be conducted upstream and downstream of the gravel placement site to ensure the project is fully compliant with the conditions of the Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality Certification required for the project. Because of the proximity of the Cedar River to the staging area for this project, the following methods of gravel placement in the river have been proposed in the Draft Biological Assessment(U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, February 14, 2000): 1. Trucks dump down access ramp, gravel is moved and placed by bulldozer(driving above water on gravel berm). 2. A gravel "shooter" is placed at the top of the access ramp, gravel is shot into the channel and subsequently moved and placed by bulldozer(driving above the water on gravel berm). 3. A conveyor belt system is placed on access ramp, gravel is moved and placed by bulldozer(driving above the water on gravel berm). Refueling of vehicles and equipment may take place near the project site, but not within 100 feet of the Cedar River. Due to concerns that supplanted gravels distributed downstream could negatively impact the 100-year floodplain, a study, "Zero Rise Floodplain Analysis for Cedar River near Landsburg, Washington," February 11, 2000, was completed by Golder Associates, Inc. In this study, the annual material to be supplanted, 1,000 cubic yards of gravel, were shown to transport from the study reach after five days in an eleven day long 100-year flood hydrograph. Therefore, the supplementation of 1,000 cy of gravel each year over a ten to fifteen year period would not have an impact on flood levels in the Cedar River. Mitigation Measures: The recommendations of the Draft Biological Assessment (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, February 14, 2000), or subsequent Final Biological Assessment as approved by the National Marine Fisheries Service, shall be followed prior to, during, and following construction. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 4. Stormwater Impacts: Erosion control measures will be implemented to control stormwater run-off adjacent to the Cedar River where staging for construction will take place (see Earth section, above). Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. ercrpt.doc City of R /B/PW Department Environmental v o e to I,ao�t Ced nook Salmon Spawning Gravel Supplementation C I TV V� R CF RE cH ia, 2000 Planning/Building/Public Works Departrn n f 6 J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Environmental e ermina ion Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. gent° ercr 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer e.I1 tenn1� 4 a STAFF City of Renton NO":�000000v�_.av REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 Project Name: Maplewood Golf Course Regrade Applicant: City of Renton Surface Water Utility Contact: Gary Schimek, PE File Number: LUA--01-105„� EC Reviewing Planner: Elizabeth Higgins fM Project Description: The purpose of this project is to regrade a section of the Maplewood Golf Course to Z41rovide protection from potential Cedar River flood flows that would be in excess of \\0 the 100 year flow(i.e. 1 in 100 chance of occurring any given year) as adopted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). The proposed project includes \oo}� � gradin and landsca in long Hole Number 3. A section of the existing cart path will r N e olis ed and subsequently replaced along the top of the regraded area. a !� Th berm,has been designed to match left bank (facing downstream) river bank elev Lions prior to the November 1995 and February 1996 flood events. As a result of these flood events, the right bank elevation was lowered by about 3.5 feet. This project will restore the pre-existing level of flood protection to the Maplewood Golf Course and adjacent Maplewood Neighborhood. Due to the proximity of the project to the Cedar River, a Shoreline Substantial Development permit will be required. Project Location: Maplewood Golf Course, Hole Number 3 Area `��, Ho�Numberf the Maplewood Golf Course is adjacent to the right bank am)of the Cedar River. All construction will occur within the rough area between the river bank and fairway. The project footprint is about 500 feet long by 18 feet wide. No construction work will take place on the banks of the Cedar River. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: Project Location Map report-ERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Maplewood Golf Course Regrade LUA-01-105,SM,ECF REPORT OFAUGUST 21, 2001 Paget of 3 DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE f NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Z. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES: 7ef_oLllo�winggerosion contro�m2easu�res ll a required annually during and following construction: �-^ a. Install and maintain temporary erosion control measures for unpaved road, parking, or disturbed areas. yb. Minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. c. Place silt fencing along areas abutting the Cedar River for the duration of the project. �— d. Following construction, contractor will revegetate disturbed sloped areas. Soil on site shall be kept moist, as necessary, during the period of the project implementation to reduce airborne dust. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following note is supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. The SEPA determination is for placement of spawning gravel located as described in the project proposal submitted. If th cation for the work changes substantially beyond the location as described, a new application must be made. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: Construction of the berm will require approximatel' 4,400 cubic yards of free-draining structural fill. Topsoil will be used in addition to the structural fill. K `� INN A,��,p`� Mitigation Measures: The following erosion control measures will be required during and following construction: a. Install and maintain temporary erosion control measures for unpaved road, parking, or disturbed areas. b. Minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. c. Place silt fencing along downslope areas abutting the Cedar River for the duration of the project. d. Following construction, contractor will revegetate disturbed sloped areas. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations report-ERC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Maplewood Golf Course Regrade LUA-01-105,SM,ECF REPORT OFA UGUST21, 2001 Page3of3 2. Air Impacts: During the project, dust and emissions from trucks and equip ent are anticipated. Dirt on construction vehicle tires may be carried off site and thereby increase air pollution" flocal roads. Watering of unpaved areas or areas where vegetation has been disturbed may be necessary to reduve impacts of dust. Mitigation Measures: Soil on site shall be kept moist, as necessary, during the period of the project implementation to reduce airborne dust. Nexus: Environmental (SEPA) Ordinance 4. Stormwater Impacts: Erosion control measures will be implemented to control stormwater run-off adjacent to the Cedar River where staging for construction will take place (see Earth section, above). Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. report-ERC Pq,nald Straka- report-ERC.doc age City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmenta�w Committee Staff Report Maplewood Golf Course Regrade LU.4-01-105,SM,ECF RL'PORTOFAugust'I. '00I Pagel of STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 Project Name: Maplewood Golf Course Regrade Applicant City of Renton Surface Water Utility Contact: Gary Schimek, PE File Number: LUA--01-105,AM, EC Reviewing Planner. Elizabeth Higgins Project Description The purpose of this project is to regrade a section of the Maplewood Golf Course to provide protection from potential Cedar River flood flows that would be in excess of the 100 year flow(i.e. 1 in 100 chance of occurring any given year) as adopted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The proposed project includes grading and landscaping along Hole Number 3. A section of the existing cart path will be demolished and subsequently replaced along the top of the regraded area. The berm has been designed to match left bank(facing downstream) river bank elevations prior to the November 1995 and February 1996 flood events. As a result of these flood events, the right bank elevation was lowered by about 3.5 feet. This project will restore the pre-existing level of flood protection to the Maplewood Golf Course and adjacent Maplewood Neighborhood. Due to the proximity of the project to the Cedar River, a Shoreline Substantial Development permit will be required. Project Location: Maplewood Golf Course, Hole Number 3 Site Area Hole Number 3 of the Maplewood Golf Course is adjacent to the right bank (facing downstream)of the Cedar River. All construction will occur within the rough area between the river bank and fairway. The project footprint is about 500 feet long by08 feet wide. No construction work will take place on the banks of the Cedar River. C(, ek qot- ¢o'r✓�.L- RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials kq�d"OAp.ud6on Map report-ERC.doc Ronald Straka - report-ERC.doc T Page 2 City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Revieiv Committee Staff Report Maplewood Golf Course Regrade LUA-01-105,SM,ECF REPORTOFAugusr2l, 2001 Puge2of3 make the following Environmental Determination: Determination of Determination of Non-Significance Non-Significance-Mitigated. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures: t The City of Renton Development Services Division proposes the following mitigation measures 1. The following erosion control measures will be required annually during and following construction: a. Install and maintain temporary erosion control measures for unpaved road, parking, or disturbed areas. b. Minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. c. Place silt fencing along areas abutting the Cedar River for the duration of the project. d. Following construction, contractor will revegetate disturbed sloped areas. r, 2. Soil on site shall be kept moist, as necessary, during the period of the project implementation to reduce airborne dust. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following note is supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. tSEPA determination is for placement of spawning gravel located as described in the project proposal submitted. If location for the work changes substantially beyond the location as described, a new application must be made. 7f�ed iheS ►tat rry D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: Construction of the berm will require approximately 4 400 cubic yards of free-draining structural fill. Topsoil —1 q pP Y Y 9 P will be used in addition to the structural fill. Mitigation Measures: The following erosion control measures will be required during and following construction: a. Install and maintain temporary erosion control measures for unpaved road, parking, or disturbed areas. L s+ r�� yQ9O C- 7 It�C_ �v cc�rK to utcd b. Minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. report-ERC.doc Ronald Straka - report-ERC.doc _ Page3. City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Maplewood Golf Course Regrade LUA-01-105,SM,ECF REPORT OF August 21, 2001 Page3 of 3 c. Place silt fencing along downslope areas abutting the Cedar River for the duration of the project. d. Following construction, contractor will revegetate disturbed sloped areas. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 2. Air Impacts: During the project, dust and emissions from trucks and equipment are anticipated. Dirt on construction vehicle tires may be carried off site and thereby increase air pollution at local roads.Watering of unpaved areas or areas where vegetation has been disturbed may be necessary to reduce impacts of dust. Mitigation Measures: Soil on site shall be kept moist, as necessary, during the period of the project implementation to reduce airborne dust. l Nexus: Environmental (SEPA)Ordinance 4. Stormwater Impacts: Erosion control measures will be implemented to control stormwater run-off adjacent to the Cedar River where staging for construction will take place(see Earth section, above). Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X_ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal ProCeSS Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 3,2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. report-ERC.doc r + CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: 12/07/00 TO: Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Division Director FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Director STAFF CONTACT: Jennifer Henning, (x7286) SUBJECT: Request for Emergency SEPA and Shoreline Permit Exemption -Installation of Temporary Flood Protection Structure Along Cedar River at Maplewood Golf Course You have requested that Emergency Exemptions from the State Environmental Policy Act and the Shoreline Master Program be granted for the installation of a temporary flood protection structure along the Cedar River. According to your memo of December 1, immediate flood protection is needed for the Maplewood neighborhood and the City's Maplewood Golf Course. The necessity of a temporary flood protection measure was identified during recent mapping of the Cedar River Floodplain by the Surface Water Utility. Mapping of the flood plain revealed that the golf course and the Maplewood neighborhood presently lie within the floodplain. Historically, this area was protected by an earth berm located along the Cedar River at the Maplewood Golf Course. However, the loss of this berm was not identified as increasing the flood hazard in the area until the recent Floodplain Mapping project. The affected area includes an estimated 163 residences and businesses in the Maplewood Neighborhood. The mapping study shows that the affected area may experience significant flooding if flows in the Cedar River increase over 9,000 c.f.s. Since this corresponds to the 25- year flood event, there is a four percent(4%) chance of this occurring in any given year. In order to prevent inundation of the Maplewood neighborhood and the golf course, a temporary flood protection structure would need to be installed immediately. The proposed temporary structure is an inflatable rubber dam, approximately 500 to 600 feet in length, 12 feet wide, and 4 feet high. The structure would be filled with 125,000 to 150,000 gallons of water,taken from a fire hydrant. This "Aquadam" structure would be installed along the banks of the Cedar River, in a location on Renton Municipal Golf Course,where the river could breach the bank. Generally, a proposal within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark of the Cedar River would require a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and SEPA environmental review. However, Renton Municipal Code provides for exemptions from Shoreline permitting for "Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements." According to RMC 4-9-190C.5: a. An "emergency"is an unanticipated and imminent threat to public health, safety, or the environment which requires immediate action within a time too short to allow for full compliance with the program. H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\JTH\cedar river emergency flood.doc\cor t r b. Emergency construction does not include development of new permanent protective structures where none previously existed. Whenever new protective structures are deemed to be appropriate means to address the emergency situation, upon abatement of the emergency situation, the new structure shall be removed or any permit which would have been required, absent an emergency,pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW, chapter 17-27 WAC or this Shoreline Program shall be obtained. c. All emergency construction shall be consistent with the policies of chapter 90.58 RCW and this Program. d. In general,flooding or other seasonal events that can be anticipated and may occur, but that are not imminent are not an emergency. Furthermore,RMC Section 4-9-190C3 exempts projects from Shoreline regulations for normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements. The temporary protective structure proposed would provide the same protection that the berm along the Cedar River provided prior to being damaged in the November 1995 flood. In addition, installation of the temporary structure is needed to avoid imminent threat to public safety. For these reasons, the proposal is exempt from regulation under the City's Shoreline Master Program. However, should the structure remain beyond 6 months time from the date of installation, application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit will be required. A copy of the Shoreline Exemption is attached to this memo. Washington Administrative Code Section 197-11-880,projects that are considered to be an emergency are exempt from SEPA review. "Actions that must be undertaken immediately or within a time too short to allow full compliance with this chapter, to avoid an imminent threat to public health or safety, to prevent an imminent danger to public or private property, or to prevent an imminent threat of serious environmental degradation, shall be exempt. " Based on the information provided to me via your memo of December 1,2000, it is clear that an imminent threat to public safety is present. Therefore, the installation of a temporary Aquadam structure to prevent flooding in the Maplewood neighborhood and on the Maplewood Golf Course is exempt from requirements of SEPA environmental review. cc: Gregg Zimmerman Jim Shepard Jack Crumley Ron Straka Jennifer Henning Leslie Betlach Randy Leifer Gary Schimek attachment: Shoreline Exemption H:\D[VISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\JTH\cedar river emergency flood.doc\cor CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT December 7, 2000 EXEMPTION FILE NO.: LUA-00-158, SME PROJECT NAME: Temporary Flood Protection Structure Along Cedar River at Maplewood Golf Course. APPLICANT: City of Renton OWNER: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Ron Straka, 425 430-7248 PROPOSAL: Temporary flood protection structure consisting of an inflatable rubber dam that will have a total length of 500-600 feet that will be 12 feet wide and four feet high. The structure will be filled with 125,000 to 150,000 gallons of water. PROJECT LOCATION: In Cedar River, near the Maplewood Golf Course. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N/A SEC-TW N-R: 22-23-05E WATER BODY/WETLAND: Cedar River An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted on the proposed project described on the attached form for the following reason(s): XX Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements. 1. An "emergency" is an unanticipated and imminent threat to public health, safety, or the environment which requires immediate action within a time too short to allow for full compliance with this Program. 2. Emergency construction does not include development of new permanent protective structures where none previously existed. Where new protective structures are deemed to be the appropriate means to address the emergency situation, upon abatement of the emergency situation, the new structure shall be removed or any permit which would have been required, absent an emergency, pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW, chapter 17-27 WAC or this Shoreline Program shall be obtained. 3. All emergency construction shall be consistent with the policies of chapter 90.58 RCW and this Program. 4. In general, flooding or other seasonal events that can be anticipated and may occur, but that are not imminent are not an emergency. cedar flood protection master doc.dot The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with (check one): CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT XX Policies of the Shoreline Management Act. XX The guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adapted by the Department. XX The Master Program. ^Gc '/7 6/0 Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division CONDITION OF APPROVAL: 1. If the flood prevention structure remains beyond 6 months from the date of this permit, the applicant shall be required to apply for and obtain a City of Renton Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Attachments: Utility Systems Division Memo Development Services Memo cedar flood protection master doc.dot bG (S) Slfo a/�/� �•�/sKG��Y Ca,vSi'�Z✓c�Zen 1=X �r�TlU/f C EXEMPTIONS FROM PERMIT SYSTEM: The following shall not be considered substantial developments for the purpose of this Master Program. 1. Any project with a certification from the Governor pursuant to chapter 80.50 RCW. 2. Any development of which the total cost or fair market value does not exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00), if such development does not materially interfere with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the State. 3. Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements. a. "Normal maintenance" includes those usual acts to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established condition. b. "Normal repair" means to restore a development to a state comparable to its original condition, including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance, within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction, except where repair causes substantial adverse effects to the shoreline resource or environment. c. Replacement of a structure or development may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the common method of repair for the type of structure or development and the replacement structure or development is comparable to the original structure or development including, but not limited to, its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance and the replacement does not cause substantial adverse effects to shoreline resources or environment. 4. Construction of the normal protective bulkhead common to single family residences. A "normal protective" bulkhead includes those structural and nonstructural developments installed at or near, and parallel to, the ordinary high water mark for the sole purpose of protecting an existing single family residence and appurtenant structures from loss or damage by erosion. A normal protective bulkhead is not exempt if it is constructed for the purpose of creating additional dry land. Additional construction requirements are found in WAC 173-27-040(2)(c). 5. Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements. a. An "emergency" is an unanticipated and imminent threat to public health, safety, or the environment which requiresimmediate action within a time too short to allow for full compliance with this program. b. Emergency construction does not include development of new permanent protective structures where none previously existed. Where new protective structures are deemed to be the appropriate means to address the emergency situation, upon abatement of the emergency situation, the new structure shall be removed or any permit which would have been required, ©1998 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 1 absent an emergency, pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW, chapter 17-27 WAC or this Shoreline Program shall be obtained. c. All emergency construction shall be consistent with the policies of chapter 90.58 RCW and this Program. d. In general, flooding or other seasonal events that can be anticipated and may occur, but that are not imminent are not an emergency. 6. Construction and practices normal or necessary for farming, irrigation, and ranching activities, including agricultural service roads and utilities on shorelands, and the construction and maintenance of irrigation structures, including, but not limited to, head gates, pumping facilities, and irrigation channels. A feedlot of any size, all processing plants, other activities of a commercial nature, alteration of the contour of the shorelands by leveling or filling, other than that which results from normal cultivation, shall not be considered normal or necessary farming or ranching activities. A feedlot shall be an enclosure or facility used or capable of being used for feeding livestock hay, grain, silage, or other livestock feed, but shall not include land for growing crops or vegetation for livestock feeding and/or grazing, nor shall it include normal livestock wintering operations. 7. Construction on shorelands by an owner, lessee or contract purchaser of a single family residence for his own use or for the use of his family, which residence does not exceed a height of thirty five feet (35) above average grade level and which meets all requirements of the State agency or local government having jurisdiction thereof, other than requirements imposed pursuant to this Section. a. "Single family" residence means a detached dwelling designed for and occupied by one family including those structures and developments within a contiguous ownership which are a normal appurtenance. An "appurtenance" is necessarily connected to the use and enjoyment of a single family residence and is located landward of the ordinary high water mark and the perimeter of a wetland. b. Construction authorized under this exemption shall be located landward of the ordinary high water mark. 8. Construction of a dock including a community dock designed for pleasure craft only, for the private noncommercial use of the owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of single and multi-family residences. a. This exception applies if either: i. In salt waters, the fair market value of the dock does not exceed two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00). ii. In fresh waters, the fair market value of the dock does not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00); however, if subsequent construction having a fair market value exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00) occurs within five (5) years of completion of the prior construction, the subsequent construction shall be considered a substantial development permit. ©1998 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 2 STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building /Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: August 21, 2001 Project Name: Maplewood Golf Course Regrade Applicant. City of Renton Surface Water Utility Contact: Gary Schimek, PE File Number LUA--01-105, AM, EC Reviewing Planner. Elizabeth Higgins Project Description. The purpose of this project is to regrade a section of the Maplewood Golf Course to provide protection from potential Cedar River flood flows that would be in excess of the 100 year flow (i.e. 1 in 100 chance of occurring any given year) as adopted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The proposed project includes grading and landscaping along Hole Number 3. A section of the existing cart path will be demolished and subsequently replaced along the top of the regraded area. The berm has been designed to match left bank (facing downstream) river bank elevations prior to the November 1995 and February 1996 flood events. As a result of these flood events, the right bank elevation was lowered by about 3.5 feet. This project will restore the pre-existing level of flood protection to the Maplewood Golf Course and adjacent Maplewood Neighborhood. Due to the proximity of the project to the Cedar River, a Shoreline Substantial Development permit will be required. Project Location: Maplewood Golf Course, Hole Number 3 Site Area Hole Number 3 of the Maplewood Golf Course is adjacent to the right bank (facing downstream) of the Cedar River. All construction will occur within the rough area between the river bank and fairway. The project footprint is about 500 feet long by 18 feet wide. No construction work will take place on the banks of the Cedar River. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: Project Location Map report-ERCdoc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Maplewood Gotf Course Regrade LUA-01-105,SM,ECF REPORTOFAUGUST21, 2001 Page2of2 DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. �I Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES: The City of Renton Development Services Division proposes the following mitigation measures: 1. The following erosion control measures will be required annually during and following construction: a. Install and maintain temporary erosion control measures for unpaved road, parking, or disturbed areas. b. Minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. c. Place silt fencing along areas abutting the Cedar River for the duration of the project. d. Following construction, contractor will revegetate disturbed sloped areas. 2. Soil on site shall be kept moist, as necessary, during the period of the project implementation to reduce airborne dust. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following note is supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. The SEPA determination is for placement of spawning gravel located as described in the project proposal submitted. If the location for the work changes substantially beyond the location as described, a new application must be made. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: Construction of the berm will require approximately 4,400 cubic yards of free-draining structural fill. Topsoil will be used in addition to the structural fill. Mitigation Measures: The following erosion control measures will be required during and following construction: a. Install and maintain temporary erosion control measures for unpaved road, parking, or disturbed areas. b. Minimize disturbance of existing vegetation. c. Place silt fencing along downslope areas abutting the Cedar River for the duration of the project. d. Following construction, contractor will revegetate disturbed sloped areas. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations report-ERC.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Maplewood Golf Course Regrade LUA-01-105,SM,ECF REPORTOFAUGUST21, 2001 Page3of3 2. Air Impacts: During the project, dust and emissions from trucks and equipment are anticipated. Dirt on construction vehicle tires may be carried off site and thereby increase air pollution at local roads. Watering of unpaved areas or areas where vegetation has been disturbed may be necessary to reduce impacts of dust. Mitigation Measures: Soil on site shall be kept moist, as necessary, during the period of the project implementation to reduce airborne dust. Nexus: Environmental (SEPA) Ordinance 4. Stormwater Impacts: Erosion control measures will be implemented to control stormwater run-off adjacent to the Cedar River where staging for construction will take place (see Earth section, above). Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation is required. Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 3, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. report-ERC.doc � r CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION Note: If there is more than on legal owner,please attach an additional notarized Master application to each owner. NAME: CITY OF RENTON PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Maplewood Golf Course Regrade ADDRESS: 1055 South Grady Way PROPERTY/PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION and Zip Code: Portions of golf course Hole Number 3 located adjacent to north of City: Renton ZIP: 98055 Maple Valley Highway(SR 169) TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-430-7200 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: N/A EXISTING LAND USE(S): Golf course APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: CITY OF RENTON PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Golf course Surface Water Utility Number of Employees: (estimated): N/A COMPANY(if applicable): N/A EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: ADDRESS: Same as Above City of Renton Recreational Open Space City: ZIP: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: (if applicable)No changes proposed. TELEPHONE NUMBER Same as Above EXISTING ZONING: Recreational open space CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING:(if applicable)No changes proposed. NAME: Gary Schimek, P.E. COMPANY(if applicable): City Of Renton SITE AREA in SQ. FT: Approximately 27,300 SQ. FT ADDRESS: 1055 South Grady Way PROJECT VALUE: $196,000 City: Renton ZIP: 98055 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? Yes TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS:(425)430-7205 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF GSchimek wci.renton.wa.us ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? The Cedar River is located adjacent to the project. Masterap 3/00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach separate sheet if needed) TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES Check all application types that apply--City staff will determine fees. _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: N/A —REZONE $ _SPECIAL PERMIT $ _LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT $ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ X SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _PRELIMINARY PLAT $ X GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ _FINAL PLAT $ (No. Cu.Yds: 4,400) _VARIANCE $ (from Section: ) $ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ N/A WAIVER $ _PRELIMINARY _ROUTINE VEGETATION _FINAL MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN MOBILE HOME PARKS: N/A $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: X SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $ X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ REVISION AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I,(Print Name) ,declare that I am(please check one) _the owner of the property involved in this application, the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are.in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. (Name of Owner/Representative) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) (Signature of Owner/Representative) My appointment expires: (THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY STAFF.) City File Number: ECF SA R SHPL CU LLA PP FP TP SP RVMP V AAD W FPUD SM SME MHP BSP A CPA TOTAL FEES: $ TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED:$ Masterap 3/00 NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Notice is hereby given that: City of Renton has filed an application for a substantial development permit for the construction or development of: A flood protection berm adjacent to the Cedar River to protect the Maplewood Golf Course and residential and commercial areas west of the golf course from floods exceeding the current 100-year flood located at: 4050 Maple Valley Highway within Sections(s) 22 of Township 28 N, Range 5 E W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Said development is proposed to be within Cedar River and/or its associated wetlands. Any person desiring to express his views or to be notified of the action taken on this application should notify the City of Renton Development Services Division, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way., Renton, Washington 98055 in writing of his interest within thirty (30) days of the last publications of this notice. Publication dates of this notice are and Masterap 3100 From: Elizabeth Higgins To: Sohimak, Gary Date: 0/13/01 7:57AM Subject: Re: Fax from DOE Hopefully, a letter that addresses the issues raised, point by point would suffice. | spoke with Marcia Geide| about it and she did not seemed too concerned. | suspect she gets similar letters from these folks ona fairly regular basis. I expressed alarm, sadness, etc. that the Tribe failed to respond within either the initial notification period nr the DNS appeal period. |f you email me the letter you put together | will oomp|aba it, including these points, return it for your raviaw, than send it to all the appropriate parties. Do you know if you need anHPAor any nf the other permibs/apprnva|s? |f not, vve can just send ittnDOE. Regarding the Shoreline permit date, vve actually sent the package nnTuesday. VVe resent itnn Wednesday because the person who sent it on Tues did not have the required legal description. | explained this toMarcia. They may have gotten it yesterday, or they may get ittoday. | asked if| could fax it and the two people I spoke with were unsure if a permit received by fax would meet the legal submittal requirement. They will send us a letter with the date it was received, which is the start date for the review period. To further complicate things, Marcia is going on vacation starting Monday and said that she will be out of the office or otherwise unable to look ot the permit before she leaves. She said the 21-day period starts when the permit is received (it is date stamped when the mail is opened) and she assured me that there would be someone or two people perhaps, doing the review in her absence. For the future, is thane something we could provide you (we have printed timelines) that could be used to ovoid this stressful situation on projects proposed? It is critical that the many stops of the required prooedunabafo||owedortheentirepermitdngpnooessoou|dberu|ed ''notincomp|ionce'' andtheprooess started over from the beginning. |n addition, there are countless unfoxseen issues that can arise tndelay the process. It is distressing on our part to be in the position of not providing our in-house colleagues with what they need todo their job. Thanks in advance for any ideas you might have.