The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSWP272744 1 RECEIVED USDA SEP 15 Natural 200� Resources CITY OF RENTON Conservation UTILITY SySTEMq Service MEETING NOTES Date: 9/20/00 Project: ESGR—Springbrook Creek SW 16'hto SW23rd Meeting Date: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 Prepared by: Rod DenHerder To: Attendees and cc's ATTENDEES AGENCY/GROUP Phil Schneider Washington Dept of Fish and Wildlife en Quynn City of Renton Re: Springbrook Creek layout and cross section, permit requirements and on-site review of preliminary layout ITEMS: The following is a summary of the discussion items and comments from the meeting: 1• ONE BANK EXCAVATION: Phil would like to see excavation of one side of bank only. All discussed the width of right of way and the proposed cross-sections required to handle the predicted flood flows. Allen stated that hydraulic modeling being performed by RW Beck will give us better idea if excavation will be required on both sides of the stream channel. 2. PHASED CONSTRUCTION: If excavation is required on both sides, Phil will pursue phased construction, i.e. work on only one bank at a time to allow riparian vegetation to re- establish prior to working on the opposite side of the creek. Phil proposed five (5) years between the construction of the opposite banks. Rod stated that because of NRCS funding and contract requirements, it may be difficult to phase construction under the current PL- 566 funding scenario. This could potentially force Renton to pay for the final phase of construction. All discussed permit ramifications of an extended contract of that length. Phil says that WDFW is not writing HPA permits to extend beyond 2003. Most other permits have a maximum 5 year life. Page 1 Meeting Notes 9-19-OO.doc September 20 2000 3. CONTACTS: Allen agreed that he would make contacts with applicable persons as part of his work on permits. He plans to use consultant to help write JARPA. The contacts are: USF&W—Nancy Brennan-Dubbs NMFS—DeeAnn Kirkpatrick Muckleshoot Tribe—not known 4. WORK WINDOW: Generally May 15 to September 15 depending on weather. 5. WOOD: Phil wants woody debris (LWD) in channel, spaced at approximately 2 channel widths ( about 40 to 50 feet). Use a variety (stacked logs,parallel logs, root wads, mixed root wads and trees, excavated holes with logs, branches,etc), large material, and use clumps - more than 1 log per LWD unit. The logs need to be at edge of or in water during low summer flows. 6. PLANTS: Phil wants existing large trees saved as much as possible and large tree species, including cottonwood and cedar planted, as well as willows, red osier dogwood, ninebark and other shrubs. He wants a good variety of native riparian plant materials. All discussed the necessity of maintenance and watering as needed until the riparian plantings can out- compete with reeds canary grass, blackberries, and other invasive species. 7. STORMWATER PONDS: All discussed stormwater ponds on the East side of the channel at Sta 653+50 to Sta. 655+00. Allen states that because of City of Renton regulations requiring detention it is not possible to open the ponds up to be hydraulically connected to Springbrook Creek. 8. STORM DRAIN: All agreed that the storm drain culvert at approximate Sta. 655+50 should be removed so that there will be backflow from Springbrook into the existing open storm drainage ditch. If there are any additions, deletions, or corrections to these meeting notes,please contact the author within 10 days of receiving these meeting notes. Cc: Larry Johnson,NRCS, Spokane SO Larry Cooke, NRCS, Spokane SO Steve Durgin,NRCS, Spokane SO Page 2 Meeting Notes 9-19-00.doc September 20 2000 Meeting Minutes#1 Date/Time: 9/19/00/9:30 am Location: Springbrook Creek Between SW 23`d and Oakesdale Ave. SW Person(s): Rod DenHerder Phil Schneider Discussion: The following items were discussed: Fish Window—The HPA fish window would most likely be from mid May to mid September. Type of plant species-In general,Phil was not too receptive to the project. He does not like the idea of clearing and grading a 130 foot section of the creek from SW 23rd to the Oakesdale Ave. bridge. He suggested doing the project in phases to minimize the impacts to the vegetative cover that is already well established. The idea was suggested to limit the project to just one side. Allen and the consultant R.W. Beck would have to look at the modeling results to determine if there is sufficient capacity if only one side of the creek was disturbed. Ron will discuss it with NRCS staff to see if it is possible to phase the construction funding over 5 years. Phil wants to see a lot of trees and plant diversity. He wants the usual native species such as willows and dogwoods and recommends using an irrigation system to insure the plants receive sufficient water until they are established. Incorporation of Pedestrian Trail—Phil would prefer not to see the trail in the bench area. Woody Debris—Phil wants to see root wads close together in groups of 2 or 3 spaced every 2 channel widths and staggered to add some variation. Use the Oakesdale Business Park Channel design as an example. Agency Contacts— DeeAnn Kirkpatrick(NMFS)206-526-4452 Nancy Dubs(US Fish and Wildlife) City of Renton Valley Flood Control Related Expenditures for the years 1992-1999 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 Project Name Panther Creek Wetland $11,280 $65,407 $12,380 $42,231 $83,871 $1,530 $633 $10,350 - -U o 0 0 x o ` N Stream Flow Monitoring $7,934 $9,072 $16,335 $10,870 $10,316 $3,965 $31,981 $2,767 ,N CD re w Mitigation Bank $82 $28,433 $52,667 $4,759 $33,370 $20,547 $25,721 $0 r X 4 Z P-1 Channel/Grady to 16th $996 $0 $22,367 $112,933 $592,412 $32,783 $234 $0 m P-1 Wetland Acquisition $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $101,000 $0 I � v Panther Creek/P-9 Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $107 $5,622 SW 43rd Street Drainage Improvements $0 $259,282 $31,315 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 v T T w X p 0� O w SR-1671mprovements3 $93,410 $24,869 $3,419 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 3 $478,864 " �_ Olympic Pipeline Culvert' $126,022 $29,582 $47,935 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1'" C $120,000 Springbrook Creek Widn. (16th to Oakesdale) $0 $296,632 $104,095 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 � m� Springbrook Creek Widn. (Oakesdale to 23rd) $5,364 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n �" ESGRWP Flood Study $0 $0 $91,565 $37,412 $0 $0 $0 $0 r SW 27th Street Culvert Improvement Project $836,485 $80,522 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Valley Study $0 $0 $30,583 $162,449 $122,005 $77,953 $48,913 $112,167 1-405/P-1 Culvert/Channel $0 $0 $0 $0 $627 $0 $0 $98,836 Oakesdale Ave. Box Bridget $3002000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SW 16th St.Bridge/P-1/Oakesdale $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,533 $0 Black River Water Quality Management Plan $0 $0 $205 $0 $0 $2,636 $26,621 $196,064 Total: $1,860,437 $913,799 $412,866 $370,654 $842,601 $139,414 $270,743 $425,806 1.$120,000 is the construction cost for box culvert paid by Olympic Pipeline 2.$300,000 is the construction cost for box bridge funded by the developer of the Oakesdale Business Park 3.$478,864 is WSDOT's portion of the construction costs j\UC� �/ c 4e f[- is n' rev,S ce( CV/ /n;f �1 C� ��S �` >��lJ% S C(%v1 f r-,#"�"41 -Er- fL 512--I L 7 City of Renton Valley Flood Control Related Expenditures for the years 1992-1999 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 Project Name Panther Creek Wetland $0 $11,280 $65,407 $12,380 $42,231 $83,871 $1,530 $633 $10,350 Stream Flow Monitoring $0 $7,934 $9,072 $16,335 $10,870 $10,316 $3,965 $31,981 $2,767 Mitigation Bank $0 $82 $28,433 $52,667 $4,759 $33,370 $20,547 $25,721 $0 P-1 Channel/Grady to 16th $0 $996 $0 $22,367 $112,933 $592,412 $32,783 $234 $0 P-1 Wetland Acquisition $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $101,000 $0 Panther Creek/P-9 Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $107 $5,622 SW 43rd Street Drainage Improvements $0 $0 $259,282 $31,315 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SR-1671mprovements3 $12,511 $93,410 $24,869 $3,419 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $478,864 Olympic Pipeline Culvert' $76,108 $126,022 $29,582 $47,935 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 Springbrook Creek Widn. (16th to Oakesdale) $0 $0 $296,632 $104,095 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Springbrook Creek Widn.(Oakesdale to 23rd) $15,694 $5,364 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ESGRWP Flood Study $0 $0 $0 $91,565 $37,412 $0 $0 $0 $0 SW 27th Street Culvert Improvement Project $160,000 $836,485 $80,522 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Valley Study $0 $0 $0 $30,583 $162,449 $122,005 $77,953 $48,913 $112,167 1-405/P-1 Culvert/Channel $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $627 $0 $0 $98,836 Oakesdale Ave.Box Bridget $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SW 16th St.Bridge/P-1/Oakesdale $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,533 $0 Black River Water Quality Management Plan $0 $0 $0 $205 $0 $0 $2,636 $26,621 $196,064 Total: $264,313 $1,860,437 $913,799 $412,866 $3707654 $842,601 $139,414 $270,743 1 $425,806 1.$120,000 is the construction cost for box culvert paid by Olympic Pipeline 2.$300,000 is the construction cost for box bridge funded by the developer of the Oakesdale Business Park 3.$478,864 is WSDOT's portion of the construction costs