HomeMy WebLinkAboutSWP272710(2) CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 23, 1998
TO: Lin Wilson
FROM: Ron Straka
SUBJECT: Memo of Understanding
Use of Surface Water Utility Property for the Oakesdale Project
The Transportation Division needs to use Surface Water Utility (SWU) properties for the proposed
Oakesdale Extension Project. The properties, which are shown in the attached drawings, will be used for
wetland mitigation, stormwater treatment, and roadway right-of-way. Since the properties were
purchased with SWU enterprise funds, the SWU is to be reimbursed by the Transportation Division for
the use of the properties. The purpose of this memo is to summarize our understanding of what was
agreed upon at our recent meeting regarding the proposed use and the amount to be reimbursed. The
memo also summarizes our proposal to use a portion of the wetland area to be created by Phase 1 of the
Oakesdale Project to satisfy the City's obligation to provide 16,700 square feet of wetland mitigation for
the Benaroya's SW 16th Street Technical Center project.
USE OF SURFACE WATER UTILITY PROPERTY
Amount of Reimbursement
P-1 Channel property adjacent to and north of SW 27th Street(see Figure 1)
The property in question was purchased by the SWU in 1992 for the purpose of constructing a large
flood control channel known as the P-1 Channel as identified in the East Side Green River Watershed
Plan of 1979. The East Side Green River Watershed Plan has recently been updated and the P-1 Channel
alignment that would have utilized the property was abandoned in favor of widening selected reaches of
the existing Springbrook Creek channel. Since the property is no longer needed for the P-1 Channel it
could have been surplused and sold at market value since there is developable land on the property.
However, since the property is needed for the Oakesdale Project the Transportation Division will
reimburse the SWU for only an amount equal to what the SWU paid for the property.
Reimburse SWU purchase price
Cost per acre' $3,425.49
Area used for Oakesdale (see Figure 1) 4.26 acres
Total Reimbursement $14,600
'The SWU paid$294,250 to purchase these and other properties totaling 85.9 acres in a package deal from the Glacier Park Company in 1992.
The cost per acre is determined from by dividing the amount the SWU contributed by the total acreage acquired. Adjacent Boeing properties
were recently appraised at about$8.20 per square foot. Based on this unit cost, the area of P-1 Channel property to be used for Oakesdale
could have cost the City$1,500,000 had the property not been purchased in 1992.
r �
Lin Wilson
Memo of Understanding
Page 2
It was originally thought that a credit would be given for excess floodplain compensatory storage created
by excavation of the water quality ponds and wetland mitigation. However, because the volume to be
created is less than the total volume needed for the Phase 1 and 2 Oakesdale projects, no excess storage
is being created.
Sorinebrook Creek property adjacent to and south of SW 16th Street(see Figure 2)
The property along the creek was recently purchased by the SWU for use in widening the channel. The
Transportation Division will reimburse the SWU for only an amount equal to what the SWU paid for the
property.
Reimburse SWU purchase price
Cost per square foot` $1.09
Area used for Oakesdale 9,402 sq. ft
Total Reimbursement $10,200
'The SWU paid$102,605 to purchase 94,473 square feet of property along the east side of Springbrook Creek from Benaroya in 1996. The
cost per square foot is determined from by dividing the amount the SWU paid by the total area acquired. The$102,605 is based on$72,776 in
surface water and$29,829.02 in water/wastewater system development charges not collected from Benaroya in exchange for the property along
the creek per agreement with Benaroya(City file CAG-96-092). The $102,605 does not include other provisions of the agreement with
Benaroya that have a future cost impact(fence along the Benaroya property,provide floodplain compensatory for Benaroya,and install raptor
perch poles when the creek is widened).
Reimbursement Process
The total property reimbursement is $24,800 and is to transferred in early 1998 between the following
accounts:
DEBIT: ? ? ? ? $24,800
Transportation account
CREDIT: 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065285 $24,800
Surface Water Utility account
The transfer is interdepartmental and may be authorized by Gregg Zimmerman. A memo to Gregg will
be prepared requesting approval of the interfund transfer for the property reimbursement. SWU will take
the lead in preparing the memo with Transportation providing review assistance.
The SWU will reimburse Transportation for the cost of the channel design and survey work that is being
completed under Transportation's contracts with Kato & Warren and W&H Pacific. Joe Armstrong will
identify these costs. To provide a clear audit trail, the design reimbursement will be handled separate
from the property reimbursement. Following are the accounts to be used for the design reimbursement:
DEBIT: 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065285 $
Surface Water Utility account
CREDIT: ? ? ? ? $
Transportation account
The reimbursement will be accomplished in 1997, if possible.
Lin Wilson
Memo of Understanding
Page 3
Only the portion of the P-1 Channel property within the roadway will be formally identified as right-of-
way. Tom Boyns will prepare the necessary documents to establish the right-of-way. The remainder of
the P-1 Channel area used by the Oakesdale project will remain SWU property. Consistent with current
procedure, the SWU will take over maintenance of the storm water facilities following their completion.
Transportation will be responsible for all monitoring and maintenance of the wetland mitigation.
USE OF PORTION OF OAKESDALE WETLAND AREA TO SATISFY BENAROYA
MITIGATION OBLIGATION
The City is obligated to provide 16,700 square feet(0.38 acres) of wetland mitigation for the Benaroya's
SW 16th Street Technical Center project. In exchange Benaroya paid the City $50,100 in lieu of having
to construct the mitigation on their development site. The intent of the City was to use the money to
construct the mitigation as part of the City's mitigation bank construction project.
Under current design plans,the Oakesdale Phase IA project will create about 2 acres of wetland. This is
about 1.5 acres in excess of what is required for the Phase IA wetland impact. The excess 1.5 acres was
intended to be reserved in partial satisfaction of the approximately 3 acres of mitigation needed for Phase
2, with the remaining 1.5 acres of Phase 2 mitigation being accomplished on the south mitigation site at
the time Phase 2 is implemented. However, the current plan for the south mitigation site proposes to
create not 1.5 acres, but about 2 acres of new wetland. This is 0.5 acre more than would be needed if all
the mitigation created as part of Phase 1A is applied as mitigation for the Phase 2 project.
Since there is currently a shortage of funds for construction of the Phase IA project, it was agreed that
the Benaroya mitigation money should be transferred to the Oakesdale project in exchange for use of
0.38 acres of the excess wetland to be created under Phase IA. Thusdthe Benaroya mitigation
requirement is satisfied and the cost of the Oakesdale project is reduced by $50,100. The Benaroya
mitigation would also be completed 2 years earlier than if the mitigation was accomplished under the
City's mitigation bank construction project, currently scheduled in the SWU Capital Improvement
Program for the year 2000.
The total transfer is $50,100 and is to transferred in 1997 between the following accounts:
DEBIT: 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065119 $50,100
Surface Water Utility account
CREDIT: ? ? ? ? $50,100
Transportation account
SUMMARY OF WORK ITEMS
Transportation will transfer$24,800 in January 1998 to reimburse the SWU for use of property that was
purchased with SWU enterprise funds. A memo will be sent to Gregg Zimmerman for approval of the
transfer. SWU will take the lead in preparing the memo with Transportation providing review
assistance.
Tom Boyns will prepare the necessary documents to establish the right-of-way.
Joe Armstrong will identify the channel widening design and survey costs. SWU will reimburse
Transportation for these costs separate from the property use reimbursement. The reimbursement will be
accomplished in 1997 if possible.
. e
Lin Wilson
Memo of Understanding
Page 4
The SWU will transfer the $50,100 that the City collected for the Benaroya wetland mitigation to the
appropriate Transportation account for the Oakesdale project. The transfer will be accomplished in
1997.
0'
attachment
cc: Ron Olsen
Sandra Meyer
Bob Mahn
Joe Armstrong
Lee Haro
Tom Boyns
Scott Woodbury
F16uRE
TOTAL UPLAND AREA, INCLU IN THE
ALL ROADWAY
UPLAND AREA W BE USED
TOTAL AREA 0 THE BY THE OAKESDALE PROJECT 0 WETLAND
ROADWAY TAK IS 1.37 ACRES MITIGATION, STORMWATER TREA AND
ROADWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
m - - - - - - - - - - .
m . - - - . . . . . . .
ZN
L
n
N '
TOTAL AREA OF P-1 CHANNEL THE AREA OF WETLANDS, INCLUDING
PARCELS SHOWN IS 7.89 ACRES 25' BUFFER, IS 3.63 ACRES . . . _
r.2-
bd
( IN rgrr)
� f
FIGURE' Z
EXHIBIT W
OAKESDALE AVE.
ROW TAKE lISJ
FREE. 0O121
SW. 16TH ST. -
� I T S B9'34'l9' W
I (6) 1165.86 b
n
(5)
(4)
45' I 45'
ITANGENTS '
I (8r T .
/O1 v
Nj
� 2
N
inr 34
I CD HILLMANS
EARUNGTON GARDE V S
? DIV. NO. I
\ ,\ VOL. 17, .'G. 74
TANGENTS
!l THRU 3J
��` �• P.O.B.
ROW TAKE AREA - 9402s.f. !12 THRU 14)
I
TANGENT TABLE \ «lJ
NO. BEARING DISTANCE
l N 30'5542' W 22.58
2 N 20'05'22- W 36.12
3 N 19.25'50' W 13.95
4 N 89'34'18' E 10.03 - P A R C E L
5 N 00 25'41' W 40.00 f^v_ 12
6 N 89'34'19' E 6.54
7 S 00'36'57' W 141.97 ---
6 S 18'02'08' E 50.76 0
9 S 2439'05' E 55.48
l0 S 33'2545' E 17.91
11 S 15'40'0Y W 65.54
12 N 30'06'08' W 3.29
/3 N 39'53'46' W 32.49
14 N 30'55'421 W 21.82
15 N 00'47'43' W 133.04 �i�,G. Y
16 S 15'40'00' W 29.89 `G�( Of WAXy o�
CURVE TABLE
NO. RADIUS DELTA ARC
Cl 700.00 02'28'OY 30.14
C2 745'00 20'5'407' I fQ
19651
C38 745.00 00'/5'40' 3.39 'rAOn,.�LIJ�219
C39 655.00 !4'S3'SY /70.3I
NOTE, THIS MAP DOES NOT REPRESENT A PROPERTY 2 19191
SURVEY AND 1S PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
E N T R A N C O PARCEL NO.
�
EKNELRS Y]EN//5T5 P/AY,rf% SUM[Tp'ts
W GT �Q�� p 12
10900 N.L.OTN SI RffI SU/T[ SUO H(L(EVUC vA,9000!
rtoa,taa,9eoo
Sean S. Woodbury
From: Ronald J. Straka
To: Sandra L. Meyer
Cc: Gregg A. Zimmerman; Sean S. Woodbury
Subject: RE: Oakesdale Purchase of City SWU Property
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 1997 1:50PM
The property in question was purchased by the Surface Water Utility with Enterprise Fund money. We are
meeting with Lin Wilson next week to discuss this subject.
From: Sandra L. Meyer
To: Lee E. Haro; Ronald J. Straka
Cc: Lin Wilson; Ronald L. Olsen
Subject: RE: Oakesdale Purchase of City SWU Property
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 1997 1:20PM
My assumption is that we are trying to stay within a fixed budet. Given that fact, and since we are over
budget by $400,000-600,000 (unanticipated actual costs not including any reimbursement to Surface
Water) it is all a mute point. We probably won't have money to pay back anyway.
Also, some of the other points below suggest that it is a non-issue.
From: Gregg A. Zimmerman
To: Lee E. Haro; Ronald J. Straka
Cc: Lin Wilson; Ronald L. Olsen; Sandra L. Meyer
Subject: RE: Oakesdale Purchase of City SWU Property
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 1997 12:54PM
I would like this to be discussed between Transportation and Utilities. If I am needed, I will get involved,
but this should be able to be resolved without me.
From: Lee E. Haro
To: Gregg A. Zimmerman
Cc: Lin Wilson; Sandra L. Meyer
Subject: Oakesdale Purchase of City SWU Property
Date: Tuesday, October 21, 1997 1 1:19AM
The estimates for right-of-way and construction are coming in high and causing potential budget problems
on the Oakesdale project.
One thing that would help a little would be a final determination as to whether transportation has to buy
the Surface Water Utility property.
At our meeting with Larry Warren a few weeks ago, you will recall that there was a general agreement that
the property was purchased with General Fund money and there would be no reason to pay SWU for the
property. Another reason not to pay the SWU is that the facilities to be put on the property are SWU
improvements, therefore, these facilities, although paid for and built by transportation, will be turned over
for SWU ownership when the project is completed, anyway. Therefore, it seems to make no sense to pay
them for property that we will improve and then give back to them.
When might we get a determination on this matter?
Page 1
7
w
Transfer of Surface Water Utility Properties to the '7 7 r01
Transportation Division for the Oakesdale Extension Pr
oject
The Transportation Division needs to use Surface Water Utility (SWU) properties for the proposed
Oakesdale Extension Project. The properties, which are shown in the attached drawings, will be u
p p sed
for wetland mitigation, stormwater treatment, and roadway right-of-wa used
purchased with SWU enterprise funds, the SWU should be paid by the Transportation Division for the
y. Since the properties were
use of the properties. Following are some options for determining the amount and method of
reimbursement.
AMOUNT OF REIMBURSEMENT
P-1 Channel property adjacent to and north of SW 27th Street(see Figure 1)
The property in question was purchased by the SWU in 1992 for the purpose of constructinga
flood control channel known as the P-1 Channel as identified to the East Side Green River Water
Plan of 1979. large
The East Side Green River Watershed Plan has recently been updated and the sped
Channel alignment that would have utilized the property was abandoned in favor of wideningselected
reaches of the existing Springbrook Creek channel. Since the property is no longer needed for the P-
Channel it could be surplused and sold at market value if the roe cted
Oakesdale project. The following two options for the amount of reimbursement it 1
property rty was not needed for the
variance in what the SWU paid for the property and what it could potentially have recovered had wide
property been surplused. he
Option 1 - Reimburse SWU purchase price
Cost per acre'
Area used for Oakesdale $3,425.49
Total Reimbursement 4.26 acres
$14,592.61
The SWU paid$294,250 to purchase these and other properties totaling 85.9 acres in a package deal from the Glacier Park Company in
1992. The cost per acre is determined from by dividing the amount the SWU contributed by the total acreage acquired.
Option 2 -Reimburse SWIJ based on assessed value of adjacent Boeingproperty
P p rty
Cost per acre'
Area used for Oakesdale $357,192
Total Reimbursement 4.26 acres
$1,521,638
The cost per acre is $8.2 per square foot based on Boeing's appraisal. The final appraised value is expected to be slightly b
City's appraisal determined a value of$l 0 per square foot.
higher since the
Springbrook Creek property adjacent to and south of SW 16th Street(see Figure 2)
Only one option is shown since the property was recently purchased and could not have been
surplused and sold as developable property.
Reimburse SWU purchase price
Cost per square foot' $1.09
Area used for Oakesdale 9,402 sq. ft
Total Reimbursement $10,248.18
'The SWU paid$102,605 to purchase 94,473 square feet of property along the east side of Springbrook Creek from Benaroya in 1996.
The cost per square foot is determined from by dividing the amount the SWU paid by the total area acquired. The$102,605 is based on
$72,776 in surface water and$29,829.02 in water/wastewater system development charges not collected from Benaroya in exchange for
the property along the creek per agreement with Benaroya(City file CAG-96-092). The$102,605 does not include other provisions of the
agreement with Benaroya that have a future cost impact (fence along the Benaroya property, provide floodplain compensatory for
Benaroya,and install raptor perch poles when the creek is widened).
METHOD OF REIMBURSEMENT
We suggest that the reimbursement be made by programming the agreed upon amount as a line item
in the 1999 Transportation Improvement Program to provide funding assistance for the SWU's
planned SW 27th Street Road Crossing Improvement Project over Springbrook Creek. The amount is
to considered separate from the amount necessary to widening the SW 27th Street road crossing for
the planned SW 27th Street HOV lane widening project.
Alternatively, the Transportation Division could pay for Springbrook channel widening design and/or
construction costs in the amount agreed upon.
F/&uRE
TOTAL UPLAND AREA, INCLU IN THE
AALL�OF THE UPLAND AREA W BE USED
TOTAL AREA 0 THE BY THE OAKESDALE PROJECT 0 WETLAND
ROADWAY TAK IS 1.37 ACRES MITIGATION, STORMWATER TREA AND
ROADWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
m . . . . . . . . . .
N . . . . . .
L .
n
N Z '
TOTAL AREA OF P-1 CHANNEL THE AREA OF WETLANDS, INCLUDING
PARCELS SHOWN IS 7.89 ACRES 25' BUFFER, IS 3.63 ACRES . . . .
W
( IN Mu)
�/&UkE Z
EXHIBIT "B"
OAKESDALE AVE.
ROW TAKE (15)
(REF. D012)
SW 16TH Sr.
e9
T______s '34'19'w
I !6J '� 1165.86 b
(5) '
(4)
1 45' I 45'
(7)1
I TANGENTS '
1 ' (811 THRU /0)
Zt
N LOT 34
J I CD HILLMANS
EARUNGTOI+' GARDE,+'S
DIV. N0. l
\:\ VOL l7, PG. 74
I
TANGENTS
(I THRU 3) � S
P.O.B.
i !:�: I F- -ROW TAKE AREA - 9402s.f. (12 THRU 14)� �
I
TANGENT TABLE \ rN1
N0. BEARING DISTANCE
l N 30'5542' W 22.58
2 N 20'05'22' W 36.12
3 N 19'25'S0' W 13.95 -
4 N 89'34'18' E 10.03 P A R C E L
5 N 00'2541' W 40.00 r^v_ 12
6 N 89'34'19' E 6.54
7 S 00'3657' W /4/.97 --
6 S PrO2'08' E 50.76 Zo
9 S 24'39'05' E 55.48
l0 S 33'25'45' E 17.91
!l S 1540'00' W 65.54
12 N 30'06'08' W 3.29
13 N 39'53'46' W 32.49
14 N 30'5542' W 21.82
15 N O0'47'43' W I33.04
/6 S l540'00' W 29.89 `G��"fig W OD
CURVE TABLE
NO. RADIUS DELTA ARC
CI 700.00 O2'28'02' 30.14
C2 700.00 2024'37' 249.36 1'w �
C3B 745.00 00'15'40' 3.39 sAb y^L
C39 655.00 !4'S3'S2' /7p,31
NOTE, THIS MAP DOES NOT REPRESENT A PROPERTY RES 2
SURVEY AND 1S PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
® E N T R A N C O PARCEL NO.EASME T SAERTTS Z PiAYN£RS ylM(7Ly6
w��T� MQ�A m� 12
;0900 N.E.6TH STRf ET SU/Tf 300 BELLEVUE ✓A.96004
f t06,454-5600
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/ BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 2, 1998
TO: Ron Straka
Lin Wilson
FROM: Scott Woodbury
Bob Mahn
SUBJECT: Reimbursement for Springbrook Creek Channel Widening Design and Construction
Management
Springbrook Creek Channel Widening Design Reimbursement
The engineering consultant team for the Oakesdale Avenue S.W. Extension Project prepared the design plans
and specifications for the Springbrook Creek channel widening from S.W. 16th Street to the new Oakesdale
bridge crossing under their contract with the Transportation Division. Based upon the attached calculations,
Surface Water Utility's (SWU) total cost for this channel widening design work has been determined to be
$44,200.
In December, 1997, SWU made an initial payment of $25,000 to the Transportation Division through an
interfund transfer; thus, leaving a remaining balance of $19,200. If you concur with the channel widening
design cost of $44,200, it is recommended that a transfer of $19,200 be processed from SWU's 421 account to
Transportation Division's 317 account.
Springbrook Creek Channel Widening Construction Management Reimbursement
The engineering consultant team for the Oakesdale Extension Project will also be providing construction
management services for the roadway construction as well as the channel widening work under a contract with
the Transportation Division. In addition, construction management of the channel widening work will be
provided by the Development Services staff as part of their inspection of the roadway project, with some
coordination involvement by Transportation Division staff. Based on the attached calculations, Surface Water
Utility's share of the construction management cost related to the channel widening has been estimated to be
$14,500.
Because the consultant's construction management contract includes on-call services which may not be needed,
the actual cost may be less than the $14,500 estimate. Therefore, it is recommended that all construction
management costs (consultant and Inspection and Transportation Division staff) related to the channel widening
be charged directly to an account/work order number provided by Surface Water Utility.
Attachment: Cost Analysis
cc: Lee Haro
Creek.doc
Oakesdale Avenue S.W. Extension Project
S.W. 16th to S.W. 27th
1. Oakesdale / Springbrook Creek Channel Widening
Design Cost Share Determination
Project Design Cost
Consultant Design Contract Billings: $ 791,175
Design Billings Included in Consultant Contract Supplement #2*: 94,828
Subtotal = $ 886,003
Less Consultant Predesign Billings in Design Contract: - 10,176
Less Consultant ROW Tasks Billings in Design Contract: - 26,457
Less Consultant Sewer Stub Design (estimated) - 3,000
Total Design Cost = $846,370
* Finalize Bid Package, Bid Period and Construction Management
Oakesdale Roadway Design Cost Share = 3,418,275 x $846,370 = $802,139
3,418,275 + 188,479
where: Oakesdale Roadway Contractor Bid (Schedule A) _ $3,418,275
Channel Widening Contractor Bid (Schedule B) = 188,479
Channel Widening Design Cost Share = 188,479 x $846,370 = $ 44,230
3,418,275 + 188,479
Say: $ 44,200
Less Previous Interfund Transfer (12/97): - 25,000
Balance Remaining = $ 19,200
2. Oakesdale / Springbrook Creek Channel Widening
Construction Management Cost Share Estimate Determination
Consultant Contract Supplement No. 2* Fee Estimate: $ 327,491
City Inspection and Transp. Div. Staff Cost Estimate: 44,327
Contractor Supplied Surveying (Schedule A) 60,000
Total Construction Management Estimate Cost = $ 431,818
Less Consultant Design Billings included in Supp. No. 2: - 94,828
Less Consultant Supplied Surveying: - 60,000
Total Construction Management Estimate Cost = $ 276,990
* Finalize Bid Package, Bid Period and Construction Management
Oakesdale Roadway (Schedule A) = 3,418,275 x $276,990 = $ 262,515
3,418,275+188,479
Oakesdale Roadway (Schedule B) = 188,479 x $276,990 = $ 14,475
3,418,275+188,479
Say: $ 14,500
Total Channel Widening Design and Construction Management Cost Share= $44,200+$14,500 (est): $ 58,700
Cr ek.dm
fir Qp ISz&
cc : ✓
CITY OF RENTON 9"; C,4,
Jpe A
PLANNING/ BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 2, 1998
.J- C3I1C�'r/
TO: Ron Straka
Lin Wilson
FROM: Scott Woodbury/ UJ
Bob Mahn
SUBJECT: Reimbursement for Springbrook Creek Channel Widening Design and Construction
Management
Springbrook Creek Channel Widening Design Reimbursement
The engineering consultant team for the Oakesdale Avenue S.W. Extension Project prepared the design plans
and specifications for the Springbrook Creek channel widening from S.W. 16th Street to the new Oakesdale
bridge crossing under their contract with the Transportation Division. Based upon the attached calculations,
Surface Water Utility's (SWU) total cost for this channel widening design work has been determined to be
$44,200.
In December, 1997, SWU made an initial payment of $25,000 to the Transportation Division through an
interfund transfer; thus, leaving a remaining balance of $19,200. If you concur with the channel widening
design cost of $44,200, it is recommended that a transfer of $19,200 be processed from SWU's 421 account to
Transportation Division's 317 account.
Springbrook Creek Channel Widening Construction Management Reimbursement
The engineering consultant team for the Oakesdale Extension Project will also be providing construction
management services for the roadway construction as well as the channel widening work under a contract with
the Transportation Division. In addition, construction management of the channel widening work will be
provided by the Development Services staff as part of their inspection of the roadway project, with some
coordination involvement by Transportation Division staff. Based on the attached calculations, Surface Water
Utility's share of the construction management cost related to the channel widening has been estimated to be
$14,500.
Because the consultant's construction management contract includes on-call services which may not be needed,
the actual cost may be less than the $14,500 estimate. Therefore, it is recommended that all construction
management costs (consultant and Inspection and Transportation Division staff) related to the channel widening
be charged directly to an account/work order number provided by Surface Water Utility.
Attachment: Cost Analysis
cc: Lee Haro
i
Crmk.dm
Oakesdale Avenue S.W. Extension Project
S.W. 16th to S.W. 27th
1. Oakesdale / Springbrook Creek Channel Widening
Design Cost Share Determination
Project Design Cost
Consultant Design Contract Billings: $ 791,175
Design Billings Included in Consultant Contract Supplement #2*: 94,828
Subtotal = $ 886,003
Less Consultant Predesign Billings in Design Contract: - 10,176
Less Consultant ROW Tasks Billings in Design Contract: - 26,457
Less Consultant Sewer Stub Design (estimated) - 3,000
Total Design Cost = $846,370
* Finalize Bid Package, Bid Period and Construction Management
Oakesdale Roadway Design Cost Share = 3,418,275 x $846,370 = $802,139
3,418,275 + 188,479
where: Oakesdale Roadway Contractor Bid (Schedule A) _ $3,418,275
Channel Widening Contractor Bid (Schedule B) = 188,479
Channel Widening Design Cost Share = 188,479
3,418,275 + 188,479 x $846,370 = $ 44,230
Say: $ 44,200
Less Previous Interfund Transfer (12/97): - 25,000
Balance Remaining = $ 19,200
2. Oakesdale / Springbrook Creek Channel Widening
Construction Management Cost Share Estimate Determination
Consultant Contract Supplement No. 2* Fee Estimate: $ 327,491
City Inspection and Transp. Div. Staff Cost Estimate: 44,327
Contractor Supplied Surveying (Schedule A) 60,000
Total Construction Management Estimate Cost = $ 431,818
Less Consultant Design Billings included in Supp. No. 2: - 94,828
Less Consultant Supplied Surveying: - 60,000
Total Construction Management Estimate Cost = $ 276,990
* Finalize Bid Package, Bid Period and Construction Management
Oakesdale Roadway (Schedule A) = 3,418,275 x $276,990 = $ 262,515
3,418,275+188,479
Oakesdale Roadway (Schedule B) = 188,479 x $276,990 = $ 14,475
3,418,275+188,479
Say: $ 14,500
Total Channel Widening Design and Construction Management Cost Share= $44,200+$14,500 (est): $ 58,700
Cruk.do
a-44, ,Ie/ ( 6/4 ut"r- 114") 101
r �r roc (J&ru(5 13/ g/y I �� GP r�. sel 3, z3',LN
nnArtaL q e c& . 9y 1 '73
St/ 78Y o,cJ— 1a 9923 = /57 x c> ,i2,1 5-7 Z. 7 7(�
LAWA r Z 9� g 2-9, 62—
tea' l otrlovi5/G.+S 0 r l a cqG i Si h�r
�Y �c..Yt-��"� I'T�'fA lJ'�rf+ 41�t�t/�-� �{,�"( l✓hJ�OLG7 /h!J'1Y�C�
54,
r
l
�tr G�a.Qe �t rc
AreA k';rU ra s s Ll. 2t
Z)576 5 9) 30
A .eJ 9YI 1 '73
5fI ie�- Cec aCCf 7eY *-v— 14 99z3= /57 x d .M, G 7Z 7 7�
IUZ!
p6tj /let l.,oe ofi
4,ret- Ot lw-sa�Ljc J (5-0- 4,�, r"
l7 al
444 � sAIMAV be.- 9'Io 16 .oI Z `f16J zYho. (S
CITY OF RFANTON
MEMI ORANDUM
DATE: April9, 1992
TO: City Coun '
`�'`
FROM: y n, uttrn P/� /PW Administrator
i �
STAFF CONTACT: Mary Lynne Myer, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: Wetlands Mitigation Bank and Property Purchase
SUMMARY:
Glacier Park Company, a subsidiary of Burlington Northern, owns a number of
undeveloped parcels in the Renton Green River Valley. Due to decisions made by their
patent company, Glacier Park will liquidate their land holdings by May 1992. The
City of Renton could benefit by: 1) working with the Corporation to establish a
wetland mitigation bank on two parcels dedicated to the City and allowing other parcels
to be filled and developed, and 2) purchasing other Glacier Park property.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE GLACIER PARK PLAT
In the mid-1970s, Burlington Northern applied for permits to fill almost 60 acres of
land in the Green River Valley. They concurrently petitioned the City for a rezone of
much of that land from G-1 to M-P and H-1. During review of the fill and grade
application and the rezone request, numerous concerns were raised about the impacts of
these actions on wetlands, wildlife habitat and flood drainage plans in the Green River
Valley.
Responding to these concerns, Burlington Northern donated 20 acres of wetland to the
City of Renton. The City was also given a one year option to purchase an additional
37 acres of adjacent wetlands. The fill and grade permits and the rezone were granted
in 1976 and Burlington Northern subsequently submitted a preliminary plat proposal for
the area.
During the same time, several flood drainage alternatives were being evaluated for the
East Side Green River Valley Watershed Plan. One of the alternative which was being
evaluated included construction of the P-1 Channel. Another alternative which was
being considered included expansion of Springbrook Creek.
ATTACHMENT D
Property Public Purpose(s) Probable Sources of #of Prior Obligations Costs -
(Lot#) Ultimate Funding acres
Performance Bond TBZ&SUCC fees Purchase(asking) LID Assessment Total
Group A
(1) Flood control, Surface water funds 25 Owed: waived, if parcel Original
wetland functions, SCS funds $16,327 not developed $100,000 $530,094.75 $100,000
water quality, Metro mitigation funds Property owner is 244,720
valley park land TCIP funds responsible for this Owed $344,720
possible SW 27th HOV LID funds cost. $244,716.78
arterial improvement park mitigation fees ! �/ SCS 3,4 park land TCIP funds 14.4 Owed: waived, if parcel included in 0 $0
flood control traffic mitigation funds $3,111 not developed purchase price for
wetland functions park mitigation fees Property owner is parcel 1
water quality responsible for this
possible Oakesdale cost.
extension
Group B
13 P-1 channel alignment Surface water utility 46.5 Owed: waived, if parcel $100,000 Original $100,000
Wetland mitigation bank rates or revenue bonds $7,777 not developed $19,147.80
commuter rail corridor park mitigation fees Property owner is
Valley park land SCS funds(?) responsible for this Owed $0 LID 285
cost.
Site 1 Mitigation bank If donated, no $ needed 31 Owed: waived, if parcel $0 owed $0
[141 flood control $6,216 not developed $0
Valley parks&recreation Property owner is Paid in full
responsible for this
cost-
Site 2 Mitigation bank If donated, no $ needed. 14 Owed: waived, if parcel $0 No LID assessment $0
part of flood control $9,722 not developed $0
parcel# Parks&recreation Property owner is
resonsible for this
cost.
Total Owed Total
$43,153 444,720
92-250.D0C/Mf2YS/bh
EXPENDITURE DETAIL
FUND 421: WATERWORKS UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
1993 1994 1994` 1995 1996 %Chg %Chg
_ ,!Noi/P>md421. Account Title Actual> Budget Actual 8udgct Budget 94-9.5 95-96
000500.018.5%0.0034.65.055170 STEEL WATERMAIN REPL 248,137 275,000 197,887 350,000 125,000 24.3# -59.1#
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055175 AC PIPE REPLACEMENT 194,624 109,000 99,302 310,000 125,000 184.IA 100.7#
000500.018.,%O.0034.65.055180 196/490 ZONE PUMP REPLMT 8,053 0 323 10,000 0 N/A -100.O#
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055193 CITY DATA LOGGER
12,119 0 3,023 0 0 N/A N/A
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055198 LAB EQUIPMENT 1,912 0 4,109 0 0 N/A N/A
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055200 WTR CONSERVA PROGRAM IMPLEME 2,524 15,000 862 50,000 50,000 233.3# 0.0$
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055205 1-405/MILL AVE
329 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055210 UPDATE FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS 36,291 0 1,514 14,000 0 N/A -100.Of
000500.016.5960.0034.65.055225 WELL 5 QUALITY REMEDIATION 11,258 0 15,444 0 0 N/A N/A
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055230 GMA PLANNING 7,568 20,000 20,309 16,000 0 -20.0# -100.0#
000500,018.5960.0034.65.055235 HIGHLANDS 565 ZONE STORAGE 0 54,0100 0 0 0 -100.0# N/A
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055240 ROLLING HILLS 490 ZONE RESERVO 0 200,000 59 0 300,000 -100.0# N/A
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055245 PARK AVE WATERMAIN REPLACEMEN 15,574 250,000 467,311 0 0 -100.O# N/A
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055255 WATER RATE STUDY 38,494 0 20,737 0 0 N/A N/A
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055260 RESERVOIR RECOATING 0 0 287 0 0 N/A N/A
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055265 EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROJECTS 20,305 20,000 23,077 150,000 50,000 650.Of -66.71
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055270 APO SEWER STUDY 9,370 0 630 0 0 N/A N/A
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055275 TALBOT 12/24-WATER MAIN- 92,881 100,000 59,122 200,000 0 100.0# -100.Of
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055280 LARGE METER REPLACEMENT 0 0 0 0 50,000 N/A N/A
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055285 AQUIFER PROTECT BUSINESS RELOC 0 200,000 0 0 100,000 -100.0# N/A
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055290 DOWNTOWN CORE REHAB 0 0 501 500,000 1,000,000 N/A 100.Of
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055300 WTR PERMITS ON SIERRA DATABASE 0 0 0 30,000 0 N/A -100.Of
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055310 WATER QUALITY MONITORING 0 0 0 20,000 20,000 N/A 0.Of
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055320 CATHODIC PROTECTION MONITOR]N 0 0 0 12,000 12,000 N/A 0.Of
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055330 565 REG RECOAT 0 0 0 215,000 0 N/A -100.0#
n00500.018.5960.0034.65.055340 CROSS CONNECTION DATABASE 0 0 0 25,000 0 N/A -100.0#
0500.018.5960.0034.65.055350 GUI MONITORING 0 0 0 35,000 0 N/A -100.04
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055360 GUI COMPLIANCE PLANNING 0 0 0 75,000 75,000 N/A 0.Of
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055370 UPDATE CONSERVATION PLAN 0 0 0 35,000 0 N/A -100.Of
000500.018.5960.0034.65.05S380 GIS DATA-BASE AND CONVERSION 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 N/A 0.Of
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055390 OPERATING PLAN 0 0 0 55,000 0 N/A -100.Of
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055400 WELL 3 ELECTRICAL REHAB 0 0 0 200,000 450,000 N/A 125.0#
000500,018,5960,0034,65,055410 AQUIFER ARTIFICIAL RECHG STUDY 0 0 0 0 40,000 N/A N/A
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055430 CORROSION CONTROL FACILITIES 0 0 0 200,000 350,000 N/A 75.0#
000500.018.59,60.0034.65,055440 MT OLIVET WATER QUALITY 0 0 0 20,000 20,000 N/A 0.04
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055450 PHOTOGRAMMETIC MAPPING OF CITY 0 0 0 0 25,000 N/A N/A
000500.018.5960.0034.65.055460 12 MAIN GRANT AV S-EAGLE PT' 0 0 0 0 175,000 N/A N/A
IA
000500.0 1 8.5960.0034.65.055470 REUSE PILOT PROJECTS 0 0 0 0 100,000 .2# N/A
WATER UTILITY UNCAPITAUZED EXPENSE 5,093,483 3,203,000 2,989,721 4,169,500 3,314,500 302# -20.5#
000600.018.5960.0038.65.065000 SPRINGBROOK REGINAL POND 1,756 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A
000600.018.5960.0038.6 5.06 500 5 STORM SEWER COMPREHENSIVE PLA 85,160 13,000 129,018 125,000 0 861.5# -100.0#
000600.018.5960.0038.65.065015 SMALL DRAINAGE PROBLEMS 121,881 182,600 226,898 300,000 100,000 64.1# -66.7#
' 000600.018.5960.0038.65.065020 WETLANDS MOSQUITO ABATEMT PRO 40,468 0 0 25,000 25,000 N/A 0.O#
000600.018.5960.0038.65.065025 VALLEY STUDY PROJECT 48,913 50,000 77,953 0 0 -100.0# N/A
000600.018.5960.0038.65.065030 BRONSON&HOUSER STORM REHAB 404 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A
000600.018.5960.0038.65.065045 NE 27TH-ABERDEEN CONTROL 1,620 55,000 3,799 373,500 0 579.1# -100.0#
000600.018.5960.0038.65.065055 CEDAR RVR FLOOD CONTROL STUDY 2,132 7,425 2,731 7,750 8,000 4.4# 3.21
000600.0 1 8.5960.0038.65.065060 PANTHER CREEK P-9 DESIGN 107 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A
000600.018.5960.0038.65.065065 BLK RIV WATER QUALITY MGT 26,621 0 2,636 0 0 N/A N/A
000600.018.5960.003,8.65.0,65072 P-1 HABITAT PLANTING 447 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A
000600.018.5960.0038.65.065076 PANTHER CK WETLAND ACQUISITION 633 0 1,530 0 0 N/A N/A
000600.018.5960.0038.65.065080 STREAM FLOW MONITORING 31,961 5,250 3,965 5,500 5,775 4.8# 5.O#
00600.018.5960.0038.65.065085 UOWR CEDR RIV NONPT ACTN PLAN 7,625 0 5,408 0 0 N/A N/A
000600.018.5960.0038.65.065090 LOWR CEDAR RIV BASIN PLAN 8,979 36,000 114,002 0 0 -100.0# N/A
000600.018.5960.0038.65.065095 LOWR CEDR RIV SEDIMENT MGT 1,282,065 210,000 137,495 600,000 300,000 185.7# -50.0#
000600.018.5960.0038.65.065100 LK WA POLLUTION CONTROL 101,766 0 27,274 0 0 N/A N/A
000600,018,51160,0038,65,065115 P-I WETLANDS ACQUISITION 101,000 193,250 193,250 0 0 -100.0# N/A
CITY OF RENTON 3.121
rtajAk Lh�i L50 1995-1996 BUDGET
CITY OF RENTON 1994 BUDGET
EXPENDITURE DETAIL
FUND: WATER & SEWER CONSTRUCTION
1992 1993 1993 1993 - 1994 %
ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ADOPTED BUDGET ADJ BUDGET YTD BUDGET CHANGE
ACCT: 421 000600 018 596 038 DIV: STORM SEWER UNCAPITALIZ EXT
PERSON RESPONSIBLE: RON STRAKA TITLE: STORM UTILITY SYSTEMS SUPERVISOR
65_42010 SW 16TH BRIDGE/P-.11OAKESDALE _ 45,45.0.00 .00 .... .00 .OQ . 0 0
65_..65000..SPRLNGBROOK..REGLNAL...POND.......................247.221.66............................00.. .. ..SQ,.877,87 ....1,755-69 ...................0.. . ..0...._.
65....65005...STORM..SEWER..COMP.REHhNSI.VE.PLAN............73.9..49.82.............23,000.00............196,.849..92 85,159..90..............1.3.0.00... 43.57.......
65....65015...SMALL..DRAINAGE..PROS.LEMS............................1.0.45.3..15.............74,.100,00............17.1.,.793...93 :...1.21,.880...81............18Z.800....1.4¢...Z.....
6.5....65020-WET.LAND.S..MOSQU.I.TO..ARATEMT..P.ROG,..........24,8.70,25.............28,.60.0.00..............40,.817.55 40,4k7...7.8.........................0....10Q..0-..
45 65025 VALLEY STUDY PROJECT 112.147.53 116,000.00 180,102.38 _.48,913.09 50,000 _56.9-
65 65030 BRONSON & HOUSER STORM REHAB ,OQ ,00 404.09 403.92 _. 0 .0
65 65037 I-4051RENTON VILLAGE 132" CULT 1,700.38 .00 3,751.24 .00 _. .. _. 0 .0
65 65042 I-405/P-1 .CULVERT/CHANNEL 98,.835.86 .00 5,555.36 .00 _ 0 _ .0
65 ..65045 NE..27TH..-..ABERDEEN..COXTRDL. _. ...............00 ...........15,0.00..Do_ 15.00.0.0.0_ ...........1,.6.1.9.85.............55.,.000....26k.7_
65.....6505.0 GYPSY...CREEK/I.-.405...CUL.VER.T. ......._ _..............66...36......................._...00............................0.0.._._.....................00.........................0.............0.
65...6505.5..C.EOAR...RYR...F.LOOD..C.ONTR.OL..S.TUDY................1_0.85...30...............Z,.1.50...00.............2b.651. 88............2,.132..34................7,.425.........3..8_.
¢5...650.k0..PANTHER..G.REER .GUALIES.LGN. .....5.,.¢21 57... .1,208,.QOQ...QO............171.6.22,3.8 ._.........106.,6..7........................0....100,.0-.
65 650¢5 BLK RLV WATER OUALITY..MGT 196,064,40 20,000.00 _ 39,159.28 _26,¢20.67 0 100,0-
65 65072 P-I HABITAT PLANTING 788.01 .00 447.39 447,38 ...... .. 0 ,0.
65 65076 PANTHER .CK.WETLAND ACQUISITION ..1.0,349.6¢ .00 310,.087.33 633.05. _ 0. .0
65 65080 STREAM FLOW MONLiORING _ _ _ 2,767 06 20,000 00 34,241.91 31,980.51 5.250 73.8-
65....65085...LOWR..CEDR..RI.V..N.ONPT..ACTX.PLAN .......7..948 .8.......... . .6,000.00_. 51,.136.13 7,625...1.3.........................0.....1.00.A.-
65....b5090...LOWR..CEDAR..RIV..8ASIX..PLAN.... .............3...423.24...........16.0,.000.00... ......18.4.,.07b...76..............8,.97.8...75.............3.6.0.0.0.......77..5-.
65...65095...LOWR..CEDR..R.LK..SEDIM.ENT..MGT...................4.1.k.9.1.3.29...........10.0,.00.0,.00........1.,.423,.452..31.......1,.282,Ok5...1.1...........21.Q.0.0Q.....1.10...0...__.
6S....b5100..LK..11A..POL LU.T ION...GON.TROL..............................4.72k.4.1................2.00.Q.00............125...23b...93............1.01,.7.kb...09.........................0.....1.Q0...Q-....
65 6511 P-I..WETLAN ACQUISITION ..19¢.11 1011000.00. 101.1000.00. _101,000..QO...........193.250.. 91..3._
�5 65119 WETLAND MITIGATION BANK PLAN QO_ 45,000.00 45,000.00 25,7�0.72.........................0 100.0-
65 65120 MAPLE'%?OD_CK..SEDIMENT.POND/F I S_ . .. .41,000.00 _41,000.00 .........3155.0.42..........200,.000.....387.8
65 65125 MAY_CREEK .BASIN PLAN .._. _ ...00 175,5.00.OQ__..... .1.75.5.00.00 ..... ....8,.485.74...........150.,.000.......1.4.5-._.
65.....65.130..UTIL.I.LY..DEVELOP.ER:S..MANUAL....................................00............20,000.A.0.............20,0.00.0.0............................00.........................0.....10.0.0-...
65.....65.135-WIADSOR-11.I.LL...STORM/.STREE.T...IMPR...........................00..............30,000.00....... ....3.0.0.00.0.0................1.,406.6.4............57.0.,.000...180.0,.0..... .
45.....65.140..RTG..S.TORM..SYS.T.EM..VP.GRADE.........................................00..............50,.000...00............150.0.00.0.0.............3&,.084..88.............8.1.,.000.......62..0...........
k5.....k5.145..MI.SS.I.ON..H.I.LLS...(NE...MIR)..STORM.............................00..............50,000...00.............S.Q.00.0 0.0......................3.1...2Q...........10Q.,.N....10.0..0............
45 4515Q.SW 7TH...CAPAC.IT.Y..P.ROBLEMS. _._ _._... .... .... ..00.........._.25,000.00 25,000.00 __.. ...00...._-..213.,000...752.0
45. ¢5155.PACCAR..72.::..ST.ORM._INTERCEPT.QR .............. ..00. . 1.00,000,00 .100,000.00 ...100A00,.OQ .........10Q.,000_. . . ,0
65 65160 LAKE WASHIN.GTON..BLVDINE..447H.E................ .. .0.0 . ...75.,00.0.00. 23,.260..32 __. 137...00 ._.125,0.00.... 66.7
65 65165 BASIN/SUB,BASIN...HYDROLOGIC ANA_...... .....__.0.0__..._........._....00 _............_.00....._.................00 ..._....1.00,0.00...........0 . .
65....65200...P-.1...CHANNELARADY WY TO SW 16 00 00 50 QOO 00 234...86 615 000 0
***** STORM SEWER UNCAPITALIZ EXT 1,172,122.82 2 4929350.00 3,872 024 96 2 041,208.29 3,006,725 22 3-
SUB-TOTAL ENDING BALANCE 8,701,894.62 2,980.00 697 602.58 9,711,203.33 - 92,617 86.7-
SUB-TOTAL'EXPENDITURES 4,199,025.24 10,090,323.00 22,253,577.35 10,232,163.62 7,837,725 64.8-
SUB-TOTAL NON-EXPENDITURES .00 .00 .00 00 0 0
SUBTOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES 10 247.05 .00 .AO 00 0 .0
•***** WATER & SEWER CONSTRUCTION 12,911 166.91 10 093,303.00 22,951 179.93 19 943 366.95 7,930,342 65 4-
I
3-164 I�
CITY OF RENTON 1993 - 1994 BUDGET
EXPENDITURE DETAIL
FUND: WATER & SEVER CONSTRUCTION
1991 1992 1992 1993 X 1994 X
ACCT. DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ADJ BUDGET YTD BUDGET CHANGE BUDGET CHANGE
ACCT: 421 000600 018 596 038 DIV: STORM SEWER UNCAPITALIZ EXT
PERSON RESPONSIBLE: RON STRAKA TITLE: STORM UTILITY SYSTEMS SUPERVISOR
65._.65.060...SIORM_SEWER..UNCAPI TALI Z EXT __._......___.-.48.95. _.. ..169,243.95...............5.,621...57......1,208,000.. ........0_- .._....... 0__100.0-
65....65065...BLK..RIV..WATER..QUALI.TY..MGT. .._..............37.,.124.06...........2.18,1.13.69............196,.06.4...40.............20..000.....233..,3.........................0.....1.00...0-
65....65.072..P.-I...HAB.I.TAT...PLANTI N.G..................................75.U1.65...............b,386.37....................7.88.01-.......................0.....100...0-.......................0...........A..
65....05.07.6..PAILT.HER..CK..1dEETLMO..ACQU.I.SIT.I.QN.............3.849 3.0...........320.43.6..99..............10...344..66.........................0..............0.........................0...........A...
65....65080...SIB M...E.LOW.00N.I.T.ORI.NG................................1..4.18.15.............1.7..00&.97...............2..7.67...06..............204000..............0................ .25.0.......7.3..0-.
6.5....65.085...LOW..CEAR..RI.V..NONPT..ACT.N..PLAN................4.830.09.............53,.Q84..9.1...........----..7...948...78................b.000..............0.........................0.....1.00..0
65....65.090...LOW.R..CEDAR..RIV..0AS.IN..PLAN.....................................00.............27...50.0.00................3...423...24...........1.60,000..............0.............36.0.00......77..5.
65....b5D9.5..LOWR... EDR..RIV..SED.IMEN.T..M6T.....................4&,.807...04.......1;562,.1.93...04...........4.1.6,9.13.29...........100,00.0............0...........210.,.000-...1.10.0...
65.....651.00..LK..WA..POLLUTI ON..CONIROL.............................1.,.036...66........1.27,963..34................4,726.4.1................2.00.0............0.........................0.....100.047.
65.....651.1.5..P.-.I.,WET LARD S.ACQUISITION. ............................. .00.. .... -0.0 .... 196.1.1...........10.1..00.0............0............19.3...250.......9.1..3...
««.« STORM SEWER UNCAPITALIZ EXT l 588f338.81 3,582,401.57 1,172,122.82 2,492,350 >30.4- 2,5731185 3.2
SUH rIQTA1 lIOING MANCE 4 933,224.30 .00 BT01,894.62 2 980 ,.0 1 931 35.2-
SUB TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,359,332.05 14,845,051.87 4:199,025.24 10,090,323 32.0- 8,618,209 14.6-
SU8=TOTAL:IION-EXPEND ITURES .00 .00 c00 0 .0 0 .0
SUB-TOTA1 OTHER FINANCING USES 00 00 10.24745 0 10 0 0
****** WATER & SEWER CONSTRUCTION 10,292,556.35 14,845,051.87 12,911,166.91 10,093r303 32.0- ;89620,140 14.6-
342
o_actprt Account Information Page: 35
10/22/1997 13:44:36 City of Renton
Account No: E 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065115 Title: P-I WETLANDS ACQUISITION Fiscal Year: 1997
Debit/Credit D Account Class: Budgeted? Y Year End Estimate: 0.00
Status Code 0 Allotment? N
JC Required? Y Locked? N
Standard Acct?: N Budget Acct:
-------------------------------------------Account History-------------------------------------------
Year Orig. Budget Adjustments Encumbrances Expenditures Balance
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1995 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1994 193,250.00 0.00 0.00 193,250.00 0.00
1993 101,000.00 0.00 0.00 101,000.00 0.00
1992 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------------------------------Account Activity-------------------------------------------
Per Orig. Budget Adjustments Encumbrances Expenditures Balance
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Totals: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page: 35
..LL
POLICY & PROCEDURE
Subject: Index: Administration
Surplus Real Property
Number: 100-12
Effective Date Supersedes Page Staff Contact Approved By
7/1/95 N/A 1 of 2 G. Zimmerman
1.0 PURPOSE:
To ensure realizing the disposal of surplus real property at fair market value in a cost effective manner,
and to establish procedures for real property sales.
2.0 ORGANIZATIONS AFFECTED:
All departments/divisions.
3.0 REFERENCES:
3.1 Policy&Procedure 250-10.
3.2 Guide to Purchasing, September 1980.
3.3 RCW 35A.80.010 "Public Utilities, General laws applicable."
3.4 RCW 35.94.040 "Lease or sale of land or property originally acquired for public utility purposes."
3.5 RCW 39.33.010 "Sale, exchange,transfer, lease of public property authorized- Section deemed
alternative."
3.6 RCW 39.33.020 "Disposal of surplus property-Hearing-Notice."
4.0 POLICY.•
It is the policy of the City of Renton that surplus real property shall be sold at fair market value to restore
project funds to the division account which acquired the property originally.
5.0 DEFINITIONS:
5.1 "Administrative Costs" are those costs incurred by the City of Renton during the processing of
property for sale. Such costs include but are not limited to salaries, supplies, advertising, and other
costs required to produce a sale.
5.2 "Assessed Value" is the dollar amount assigned by the King County Assessor as the valuation of the
land and improvements for taxation purposes.
5.3 "Fair Market Value" is the price that a willing buyer would pay to a willing seller for the purchase of
property in an open and competitive market.
Surplus Real Propert}
Page 2
5.4 "Surplus Real Property" is property acquired by a division which is no longer needed to fulfill the
original or an alternate need within the same division.
6.0 PROCEDURE:
6.1 Any department or division having surplus real property shall request Council approval of declaring
the property surplus.
6.2 If approved,the Council shall authorize the Property Services Division to order an appraisal to
determine the fair market value of the property.
6.3 Council shall set a date for a public hearing, as nearly as possible to 60 days from original approval.
6.4 At least 10 days but not more than 25 days prior to the hearing,the City Clerk shall cause to be
published a public notice setting forth the date,time and place of the hearing, at least once in a
newspaper of general circulation in the area where the property is located. This notice shall identify
the property using a description which can be easily understood by the public, and shall describe the
proposed use of the lands involved.
6.5 At the conclusion of the hearing and approval of the matter,the Council shall adopt a resolution
declaring the property surplus.
6.6 Property Services Division shall offer the subject property to other City departments, other local
agencies,the abutting property owners,and any parties having expressed an interest in the property;
and advertise for bids for one week following the public hearing. For the following two weeks,
sealed bids may be received, time and date stamped, and the highest and best offer within 10%of, or
over,the appraised value shall be accepted.
6.7 Transfer of parcels to other City departments shall be handled through an interdepartmental transfer
process. Sales of parcels shall be handled through independent escrow.
6.8 In the event no acceptable offer is received within the bid period,the property shall continue to be
marketed by Property Services Division on a first come first served basis, using all resources
common to the marketing of such property, including but not limited to installing signs, distributing
offering information to local real estate firms, and publishing offering information monthly in a
neighborhood newspaper.
6.9 Property Services Supervisor shall be authorized to negotiate with prospective purchasers and accept
reasonable offers on behalf of the City after ensuring concurrence from the proprietary department in
the terms of the sale.
6.10 Costs of maintaining the property pending sale shall continue to be the responsibility of the
proprietary department.
6.11 The administrative costs of this procedure shall be reimbursed to Property Services from the
proceeds of the sale. The balance of the proceeds shall be credited to the appropriate account of the
proprietary department.
7.0 APPLICABILITY:
7.1 This policy shall be applicable in all cases except those wherein the City has prior contractual or
legal obligations for disposal of the property.
i
r
000590 -v°J°1 3 a lay !g"7/ 7'1'f 6, !6
Z5Z3ey9001 Sys Qva 290/ of0Sp
- 1
...c-� \��'�•/' } �`•,,,*,�,...{L--i��E r�:.����•-�'-! i{11
.v � I � 5 Rsttar
N ,A rr,�'
/�wn
\�= to
f 1 � y�� �• {y QW-6��L,�J
� � �"�....... ..?i _ 7
W-13Nd t L-4 $ ,, a
W-13Nc` f€ .«.»`.... W-4� t .=
-49
» k
f/ Yt _k .0,W-13Sd
ly-
1Y I W-13sn,�' 1
Os
I W-
W*45L-•
i
Project Boundory
Wetland --� —.
'.•...•wt« "� -3
�Gtigation Wetland
(.':��_�'# � i�.�rxr�• �T�aa%� i�..............
r++.i.�!a� r r"»' i 1�.••-�
,. W—
,' 1: : W-1
w
EXHIBIT"A"
ENTRANCO
MICHAEL G.YEOMAN,PLS
P (7027.21
akesdale Ave. i t-of-Way
August,1997
RIGHT-OF-WAY TAKE
ref.D012
(continued form page I of 2)
thence North 89'34' 18"East a distance of 10.03 feet;thence North 00°25' 41"
West a distance of 40.00 feet to the north line of said parcel;thence North 89°34'
19"East,along said north line,a distance of 6.54 feet; thence South 00° 36' 57"
West,along the easterly line of said parcel,a distance of 141.97 feet;thence South
18' 02' 08" East, continuing along said easterly line, a distance of 50.76 feet;
thence South 24°39' 05" East,continuing along said easterly line, a distance of
55.48 feet; thence South 33°25' 45" East,continuing along said easterly line, a
distance of 17.91 feet to the point of curvature of a 745.00 foot radius non-tangent
curve to the right, the center of which bears North 74° 35' 40"West 455.00 feet
distant; thence southwesterly along the arc of said 455.00 foot radius curve,
through a central angle of 00° 15'40",an arc distance of 3.39 feet;thence South
15° 40' 00" West a distance of 65.54 feet to the westerly line of said parcel;
thence along said westerly line North 30° 06' 08" West a distance of 3.29 feet;
thence North 39°53'46"West a distance of 32.49 feet;thence North 30°55,42"
West a distance of 21.82 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing an area of 9,402 square feet,more or less.
�k
.2
O
19651
OVAL L+Ijfl
EXPIRES 02 / 19 /9t
G / 177
EXHIBIT "B"
OAKESDALE AVE.
ROW TAKE (15)
(REF. DO12)
_ ______SW. l6TH ST. _
•-- --T-------;-------- ---
i T S 89'34'19' W
I (6) '6 1165.86 b
Iop
(5) '
45 I 45'
Lu
1
ITANGENTS
11 + (8�THRU l0)
N ', \ e' LOT 34
�� ` I CD H/LLMANS
3s`7` EARLINGTON GARDENS
DIV. NO. I
\` VOL. 17, PG. 74
TANGENTS
(! THRU 3) S
� `• � P.O.B.
ROW TAKE AREA - 9402e.f. (12 THRU 14)
TANGENT TABLE ul)
NO. BEARING DISTANCE
! N 30'55'42' W 22.58 :<
2 N 20'05'22' W 36.12
3 N 19'25'50' W 13.95 PARCEL
4 N 89'34'l8' E 10.03 0
5 N 00'25'41' W 40.00 JTr 12
6 N 89'34'19' E 6.54
7 S 00'3657' W 141.97 ---
8 S /8'02'08' E 50.76 �?
9 S 24'39'05' E 55.48
/0 S 33'2545' E 17.91
11 S /5'40'00' W 65.54
12 N 30'O6'08' W 3.29
l3 N 39'53'46' W 32.49
14 N 30'5542' W 21.82
15 N 00.4743' W /33.04
16 S l5.40o' W 29.89 ~G �WAS DO
CURVE TABLE
70. RADIUS DELTA ARC
CI 700.00 02'28'02" 30.14 �j,
v C2 T00.00 20'2437' 249.36 �J 1�P 9 �
C38 745.00 00'15'40' 3.39 s7biy^�
C39 555.00 /4'5352' 170.31
NOTE: THIS MAP DOES NOT REPRESENT A PROPERTY os+�Ea 2 19/9f
SURVEY AND IS PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
® SFfIE N T R A N C O PARCEL NO.
ENGMEERS • RYEATISTS P(M'MERS SV/
WACTON ARQONA loMo IDAHO
10900 M.£.QTH STREET SUITE 300 BELLEVUE WA.90001 12
I£OQ1 BSI-S000
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 20, 1997
TO: Lin Wilson
FROM: Ron Straka
STAFF CONTACT: Scott Woodbury
SUBJECT: Acquisition of Surface Water Utility property for the Oakesdale Extension
Project
The Oakesdale Extension project needs to use Surface Water Utility property for the proposed roadway
and related stormwater treatment and wetland mitigation facilities. Now that we have preliminary
appraisals for adjoining parcels I would like meet with you to discuss the process whereby the Oakesdale
project is transferred the rights to the land from the Surface Water Utility.
I have attached for your review a preliminary drawing of the P-1 Channel property north of SW 27th
Street showing the area that will used for the Oakesdale project. We will be using this drawing for
reference in our meeting.
Though Microsoft Schedule, we have tentatively reserved Tuesday, October 28, at 9:00 am. If it okay
with you, we will come to your your office where there is more space as Scott Woodbury will also
attend.
cc: Tom Boyns
f
TOTAL UPLAND AREA, INCLU IN THE
ROADWAY TAKE, IS 4.26 ACR S.
ALL OF THE UPLAND AREA W L BE USED
TOTAL AREA 0 THE BY THE OAK ES DALE PROJECT 0 WETLAND
ROADWAY TAKE' IS 1 .37 ACRES MITIGATION, STORMWATER TREA M T, AND
ROADWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
l� . . . . _ . . . . .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THE AREA OF WETLANDS, INCLUDING
TOTAL AREA OF P- 1 CHANNEL - -
PARCELS SHOWN IS 7.89 ACRES 25' BUFFER, IS 3.63 ACRES - _ - - -
0 1"=100' 100
( IN FEET )
�� `%7��, S� ��� � .� �-�� � U�c��` �� ��� G►���-, �� , Sao���� "�S ��+��Q,- � - �, �
4c, Gr
Y-7
f
y �
Jdirla w/ ?S �a.(ft z 3, 3 ac
! - G �c� /41cOI S �' , 91 4i,
o t"=too' 100
( IN FEET )
O
O W
z
0