Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSWP272149(13) DESIGN FOLDER P- 1 CHANNEL EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER W.P.P. 'STA 670+ 31 - 680 +26 .37 i RENTON PROJECT OFFICE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE U . S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FINAL l]ESIGN REPORT SITE : P-1 Channel , Sta 670+76 to Sta 680+26 . 37 WATERSHED: East Side Green River LOCATION: City of Renton, King County, Washington AUTHORITY: Small Watershed Program, Public Law 566 June 1993 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE RENTON, WASHINGTON • Final Design Report Page 1 • ESGR P-1 Channel , Sta 670+76 to Sta 680+26. 37 June 1993 SUMMARY The East Side Green River Watershed Plan was approved in 1966 , modified by supplement several times , and revised in 1978. An adequacy determination of the 1979 Final Environmental Impact Statement for the ESGR project was completed for the City of Renton in 1989 which concluded that the 1979 Final EIS was not adequate to continue the project without a supplemental EIS . As of this date the required supplement to the EIS has not been completed. As a part of the supplemental EIS the hydrology and hydraulics for the channel is being re-analyzed using the Hydrologic Simulation Program - Fortran (HSPF) and HEC1 hydrologic models and the FEQ hydraulic model . Although the design peak flows for the project will probably change , the channel configuration in this reach will not . The new channel bottom width will be 60 ft . due to the size of the existing structural components immediately upstream, downstream and in the middle of the reach being considered in this design. The existing channel , upstream of the Grady Way box culvert • is not of adequate size to contain the design flood flows and the channel immediately downstream of the SR405 bridge is actively eroding and depositing material downstream of the Grady Way box culvert . Components of the project which have been completed to date are as follows: COMPONENT YR. COMPLETED Black River pump station 1973 Outlet channel 1981 Storage pond upstream of the pump plant 1984 Grady Way Box Culvert 1985 2600 ' of channel between the storage pond and 1986 Grady Way. E . wall of the channel-Grady Way to S .W. 16th 1988 SR405 Box Culvert 1989 S .W. 16th St . Bridge Replacement 1991 Final Design Report Page 2 ESGR P-1 Channel , Sta 670+76 to Sta 680+26 . 37 June 1993 DESCRIPTION OF JOB The original East Side Green River Project consist of a system of improved channels about 11 miles long to convey flood water from flood plain areas in Renton, Kent , and Tukwila to a 3 ,000cfs pump plant in Renton which was intended to pump the flood flows into the Green River . Since the original project was planned the City of Kent has indicated ( informally) that they are no longer interested in participating in the project . This will significantly reduce the length of the channels in the system. The design for this reach of the P-1 channel will consist of a 175 ft . reach between Grady and SR405 and 430 ft . between SR405 and S .W. 16th. There now exist a concrete retaining wall ( constructed in 1988 ) which will compromise the east side of the channel . This job will consist of a 60 ft bottom channel with a trapezoidal low flow channel for base flow conveyance and fish passage, three concrete wing walls , approximately 80 foot of wire mesh gabion wall and Large Organic Debris (LOD) for fish habitat . At the completion of this phase the P-1 channel will be complete between SW 16th and the Green River. Also, incorporated into this job at the City of Renton ' s request , is an impervious membrane which will be laid flat approximately five feet below the proposed channel . This membrane is for the City of Renton ' s benefit in order to provide a greater flow path for ground and runoff water which would flow into the drainage system under Oaksdale Ave which is located 20 ft . away from and parallel to the P-1 channel . DESIGN OBJECTIVE The purpose of this design is to convey the design flood flows safely between S .W. 16th St . and Grady Way in Renton. This section of channel , as is true with all of the P-1 channel will be designed to provide fish passage and fish habitat during periods of low flow as well as riparian zone enhancement . BASIS FOR DESIGN 1 . Revised Watershed Work Plan, East Side Green Watershed, King County, Washington, June 1978 . 2 . National Engineering Manual . 3 . NEH 20 , Standard Material and Construction Specifications 4 . Hydrology studies by SCS during planning and subsequent revisions , followed by design hydrology. Final Design Report Page 3 ESGR P-1 Channel , Sta 670+76 to Sta 680+26 . 37 June 1993 �i 5 . SCS TR61 WSP2 Computer Program. 6 . Design hydraulics for the whole project of which this job is a component . 7 . The mitigation agreement signed by sponsors , Washington Department of Fisheries , Washington Department of Game, U. S . Fish and Wildlife Service and SCS is the basis for design of the low flow channel , bank vegetation and other features which will improve the environment for man and wildlife 8 . SCS Design Note No. 6 . 9 . SCS Soil Mechanic Note No. 1 10. Geologic Reports by various consultants . DESIGN NARRATIVE 1 . LOCATION AND LAYOUT • This phase of the P-1 channel is located just West of Oaksdale Ave . between Grady Way and S .W. 16th St . in the City of Renton. The charnel is approximately 600 feet long extending upstream from the end of the Grady Way box culvert to just South of the S .W. 16th St . Bridge . The location is the same as indicated in the work plan. 2 . HYDROLOGY Hydrology for the work plan was revised by Keith Busch in 1980 during design of the storage pond. All calculations and summaries are located in the design folder for the P-1 Channel Floodwater Storage Pond. The hydrology for this watershed is currently being refined by Renton using the HSPF model but has not been accepted by the SCS . 3 . HYDRAULICS Preliminary hydraulics were run in 1983 for the revised East Side Green River Work Plan. That hydraulic criteria is still in effect . In order to provide a more • environmentally desirable project the existing channel under the SR405 Bridge will be left open. t Final Design Report Page 4 .y! ESGR P-1 Channel , Sta 670+76 to Sta 680+26 . 37 June 1993 This channel configuration required hydraulic analysis of split flow. The split flow was analyzed using WSP2 by rating each branch of flow, plotting water surface elevation vs . channel cross sectional area then matching the elevations and finding the corresponding areas and determining the discharge from the area. WSP2 was then run using the predetermined discharge to determine the velocity in each branch. To provide cross sectional area for in-channel conveyance and room for fish habitat large organic debris (LOD ) the bottom width of the low flow channel has been changed from eight to 12 feet and the channel bottom raised 0. 5 ft . This will also help establish channel invert grass growth by preventing channel invert inundation during low flow conditions . 4 . SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION The foundation investigation and soil mechanics recommendations were made using geologic reports by Hong Consulting Engineers , GeoEngineers Inc . and Ch2M Hill . The applicable geologic report and test results are located in the Geology section of the design folder . The design narrative for the structural design also discusses the soil mechanics values used. Slope stability programs were run for the gabion channel wall and is included in the design report under Geology. The slope stability of the soils at design hydraulic velocities was evaluated and it was determined that protection was needed. However , an early seeding of the channel in addition to the placement of an excelsior blanket should provide the necessary protection. So that vegetation can be established prior to winter , a time limit has been established in the specifications for the seeding. Also, raising the channel bottom 0 . 5 ft . will provide a relatively dry seed bed for the establishment of protective grass . The area under the SW 16th St . bridge will be rock riprapped. After construction of the P-1 storage pond in 1984 it was discovered that toxic sediments are being transported by Springbrook Creek. In order to address the sediment and water quality of Springbrook Creek the City of Renton contracted to have the Black River Basin Water Quality Management Plan prepared in 1993 . This report included data from sediment quality tests at several locations along Springbrook Creek, including a location just • upstream of S .W. 16th St . Final Design Report Page 5 3 ESGR P-1 Channel , Sta 670+76 to Sta 680+26 . 37 June 1993 The sediment quality results at this single location indicate, generally, that off site sediment disposal will not be required for this reach of channel . In order to further investigate sediment quality and substantiate this one test site, sediment will be tested at other locations within this channel reach . At this time , the additional testing has not been performed. Pending additional study results , no provision for sediment off site removal was included in this design. If need be the design can be modified to include a drawings, specifications and a separate bid item for off site disposal of Springbrook Creek sediment . 5 . STRUCTURAL DESIGN The Grady Way box culvert wingwall design which was approved of , and used in the Pond to Grady Way project was used for this project . The box culvert wingwalls were designed as cantilever retaining walls using the ultimate strength method as outlined in TR 67 . The design narrative discussing the procedures and values used is located with the design calculations in the STRUCTURAL section of the Pond to Grady Way design folder . 6 . DEWATERING Due to the buried PVC membrane under the channel the City of Renton has requested that the site be dewatered to elevation -10.0. This will take a substantial dewatering effort due to the large amount of ground water in the vicinity of the site . Also, the timing of the construction will be important to insure ground water levels are at seasonally low level . 7 . SPECIFICATIONS Specifications are based on NEH 20 Construction Specifications with items of work written for specific items . The specification for dewatering was written to allow for specific partial payments based on what part of the work was completed. The specification for vegetation of the channel has specific dates for seeding. The PVC liner specifications were written for the City of Renton by CH2M Hill . Final Design Report Page 6 ESGR P-1 Channel , Sta 670+76 to Sta 680+26 . 37 June 1993 8. COST ESTIMATE Costs were based on experience, previous bids , cost estimating references and an estimated schedule of work and sequence of operation. 9 . INSPECTION A 90" METRO Sanitary Sewer pipeline which comes close the channel at approximate station 672+50 will require special attention and inspection during construction. A representative of METRO will be on the site during all excavation near the pipeline . 10. APPURTENANCES , SPECIAL FEATURES In order to increase the head loss from the P-1 channel to the adjacent Oaksdale Ave . underdrain system the City of Renton has requested the installation of a 30 mil . • PVC impervious membrane under the channel . The membrane would be placed at elevation -5.0 and extend from the East P-1 retaining wall to the toe of the West slope ( 60 ft . ) . CH2M Hill has designed the membrane and written the specifications for it . 11 . OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE A copy to the P-1 Channel Operation and Maintenance plan is included with this report . 12 . CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE The work on this project will be controlled by the requirement to have the channel excavated by Sept 15 for adequate grass growth prior to the rainy season. The work on the box culvert wingwalls is best performed in the dry season, however if adequate dewatering is done it can be done during the wet season. The dewatering for the PVC membrane will be easier during the late summer months . The channel work will require diverting Springbrook Creek. All construction that requires equipment to be in the creek must be completed by September 15th to comply with Washington Dept of Fisheries Hydraulic Project Approval permit . • Final Design Report Page 7 ESGR P-1 Channel , Sta 670+76 to Sta 680+26. 37 June 1993 PREPARED BY: Date: DAVID R. DISHMAN Civil Engineer RECOMMENDED BY: Date : KEITH E . BUSCH State Design Engineer APPROVED BY: Date : • JULIAN L . MEUER State Conservation Engineer • J C a r re sari J Vf= 935 Powell Ave SW United States Soil Renton, WA 98055 Department of Conservation Agriculture Service September 29, 1992 Mr. Joe Robe Habitat Ma gement Division Washingt Dept of Fisheries PO Box 3155 Olym la, Washington 98504-3155 Re: East Side Green River, P-1 Channel Connecting Channel, Grady to SW 16th Dear Joe: Enclosed are meeting notes and concept drawings based on discussions at our recent meeting on September 22, 1992. In addition are notes from a May 24, 1989 meeting in which we agreed to use gabions for the west bank of Springbrook Creek as it goes between I405 and the adjacent roads. Note that we have a problem at the NW corner of the SW 16th bridge to fit the excavation in the space available between the 72" sewer and side of channel, therefor may have to use rock wall, gabions or some other slope protection. Please review at your earliest convenience and give us any additional comments and/or concerns you may have. I am also including a copy of Ivan Line's assessment of this area for biologic value and function. We will have him review and update after we have firmed up some decisions on the final configuration of the creek re-alignment. Thank you for your input and if you have any questions feel free to call me at 764-3325. Sincerely, Roderick L. Den-Herder, P.E. Project Manager attachments cc: Ron Straka, City of Renton Julian Meuer, SCS, Spokane SO Ivan Lines, SCS, Spokane SO Dave Dishman, SCS, Renton WSPO O The Sod Conservation Service `J is en agency of the Department of Agriculture 1 NOTES TO FILE Date: September 22, 1992 �J What: ESGR, P-1 channel, SW16th to Grady Way Connecting Channel PARTICIPANTS: Ron Straka , Stormwater Utility, City of Renton Joe Robel, Habitat Mgmt, .WDOF, Olympia Don Haring, Asst Chief, Habitat Mgmt Div, WDOF, Olympia Dave Dishman, SCS, Renton Brant Dallas, SCS, Renton Rod DenHerder, SCS, Renton Participants reviewed construction drawings of proposed P-1 channel between Grady Way and SW 16th Street that were prepared by SCS, based on agreement made during May 1989 meeting. The drawings were of an excavated channel, with a 60 ft bottom underlain with an impervious lining a minimum of 5 feet below the lowest part of the channel. This channel would be excavated between the Grady Way box culvert and the I-405 box culvert and then between the I-405 box and the SW 16th Street bridge. A rock-lined low flow channel would be built and gabions used as the west wall. Willows and other native plantings would be planted along this side. The existing creek bed under the I-405 bridge would be filled in. Joe had "major problems" with the gabion walls and filling in the old channel under the I-405 bridge because of high cost and filling of old channel (wetland). Joe reasoned that leaving the existing channel open would decrease velocity, provide more flood storage and make it easier to get a permit. Ron agreed with him that permits would be easier to obtain permits without blocking off the old channel and filling it in. Discussions covered erosion of existing west bank N of I-405, potential erosion at I-405 bridge piers, erosion of old channel inlet and outlet, and types of vegetation with which to replant the channel. It was also discussed about cutting trees and excavating sediment deposits in low flow channel downstream of Grady Way. Joe said he had no problem with some thinning of the larger Alders so that other woody vegetation could come in but did not want the channel banks cleared. Dave assured him that because of the thousands of dollars we had spent replanting the channel, that we would not be cutting all plant growth - only the Alders. Joe was against excavating any sediments out of channel. He indicated a desire to replace blackberries with other vegetation along the channel. Page 2 9-22-92 The following were agreed to by participants: 1 . Construct excavated portion of channel as shown on drawings, i.e. 60 foot bottom with low flow channel. 2. Do not block off flow to existing channel under I-405 bridge and do not fill in old channel. 3. May use rock to protect and stabalize I-405 bridge piers and abutments. 4. May use rock or other means to prevent head cut and erosion at entrance and exit to existing stream channel. 5. May stabalize eroded area of existing channel NW of I-405 bridge. 6. Must re-establish native vegetation, willows, etc on excavated banks as part of the project. 7. Must determine wetland delineation, values and function of channel using both 1987 and 1989 manuals. 8. SCS would develop conceptual drawings for participants to review. Any changes or addition sh d be submitted to Rod DenHerder at 764- 3325. it/ q A MEETING MINUTES DATE OF MEETING: May 24, 1989 PRESENT: Joe Robel WSDOF Rod Den—Herder SCS Dave Dishman SCS COPIES TO: Joe Robel Rod Den—Herder Dave Dishman Ivan Lines PROJECT: P-1 Channel — Station 671+94 to 678+30 ITEMS: Rod and Dave went over the drawings for the P-1 channel between Grady Way and SW 16th with Joe . We all discussed the fact that CH2M Hill is considering lowering the impervious membrane in the vicinity of the low flow channel but that the liner would be no higher than elev . —3.0 at any place along the channel . Joe didn ' t have a problem with that as long as there was at least 5 ft. of earth above the membrane . We discussed the _transition wall slab and Joe was not opposed to its ' construction . Joe was shown the drawings of the proposed fish habitat components and their locations in the low flow channel . Joe indicated that the components as shown on the drawings were satisfactory . The wildlife habitat planting plan was discussed . Joe ' s understanding was that willows would be planted between the gabion blocks but these were not a part of the planting plan . SCS said they would look into placing willows between he gabion blocks . Clean—out of the low flow channel in the vicinity of the Metro pipeline crossing downstream of the Grady box culvert was discussed . It was pointed out by SCS that in order to have the base flow contained in the low flow channel and not inundate the entire channel bottom between Grady Way and SW 16th we could not afford the 0.5 ft of head loss that the clogged low flow was causing , and clean—out would be needed . Because it isn ' t certain when the channel will be constructed Joe decided to wait on the issuance of a permit for channel clean—out because the extent of deposition in the low flow channel might change . For additions deletions or changes to these minutes please contact Dave Dishman . Submitted by : David R. Dishman UNITED STATES SOIL W. 920 R i v o r s i d e, Rm. 360 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Spokane, Wa. 99201-1080 �J AGRICULTURE SERVICE DATE: 6/1/89 SUBJ: BIOL-Assessment of Springbrook Creek Re-alignment SW 16th to Grady Way TO: Rod DenHerder, Renton cc-Tibke m e u e r- Easter This assessment compares the existing and future function and value of Spr i ngbrook Creek from SW 16th street to Grady Way within the city of Renton. The creek will be nearly -totally realigned as a component of the East Side Green River flood control project. The following narrative describes the condition of the creek as observed on foot on May 25, 1989. Also refer to attached pictures of each reach . A. SW 16th to I-405 (approximately 400 feet) Right Bank-The lower bank in this reach is dominated by a • mixture of grasses and forbs , with approximately 50% of the lineai distance dominated by alder and cottonwood saplings and blackberry vines . The top of the bank has been recently disturoad by construction activities and is about 50% herbaceous plants and 50% bare soil that has been recently hydro-seeded . Left Bank-This bank is nearly totally covered with cottonwood and alder saplings and blackberry vines. Function and Va I uo- Fish-This reach provides an essential transportation corridor for anadromous fish. The charnel bottom is largely silt and provides no spawning areas . The creek has a trapezoidal configuration and lacks instream cover due to periodiQ channelization for flood control purposes . A lack of suitable in—stream structure coo led with severely chair- i or.sated water qua I i ty l arge l '.Y PrnQlujus use of the area by rearing salrmonids. Wildlife-The area contains a small ,amount of woody and herbaceous vegetations which provides fair- to poor cover and Feeding areas for songbirds and sma l I mammals that are not sensitive to a high degree of urban disturbance . The open water is occasionally used by waterfowl , such as mallards, that are tolerant of frequent human disturbance. Because of frequent mechanical disturbance within the creek banks there is a lack of species and age diversity in the existing plant community . All of the wood plants are relative )Y Y p y young e saplings because of the periodic mowing that has taken place in the past . Wetlands-Approximately 15 to 20 feet of open water in the channel and 2 to 3 feet of woody and herbaceous vegetation on each side of the channel can be classified as a lower perennial riverine wetland with an unconsolidated bottom. Hydrology-The well defined creek channel serves as an essential conveyance system for- water and sedinfrent from a 25 square mile watershed . B. Under I-405 Bridge (approximately 2"00 feet) Right and Lett Banks-This reach is a trapezoidal , rock lined channel under the I-405 bridge . There is no vegetation and the only diversity is provided by a series of vertical concrete pilings which support the bridge. Function and Value- Fish-This reach provides essential transportation water for salinonids , no spawning and very limited rearing habitat. Wildlife-This reach provides practically no wildlife habitat. Sorne swallows and pigeons perch and nest on ledges on the underside of the bridge . Wetlands-There are no hydrophytes bordering the channel within this reach because of the shady from the bridge and the angular rock rip-rip that lines the channel . Approximately 15 to 20 feet of open water- within the channel can be classified as a lower perennial riverine wetland with and unconsolidated bottom. Hydrology-Serves as essential conveyance of water and sediment under I-405 from a 25 square mile wptershed . C. I-405 Bridge to Grady Way (approximately 150 feet) Right bank-The right bank in the lower end of this reach is dominated by grasses and (orbs with a few alder saplings at the edge of the water. Approximately 220 to 30 feet of the bank within this reach is dominated by blackberry vines and approximately 50 to GO feet , immediately below the I-405 bridge, is a bare , actively eroding bank with very little vegetative cover. The top of the bank is presently covered with piles of wood , steel and other miscellaneous debris from nearby road and bridge construction activities . Left Bank-There is a 2 to 3 foot wide strip of reed-canary grass along the edge of the creek . The upper bank has been recently covered with rock rip-rap and there is no vegetation . Function and Value- Fish-This reach is morphologically similar to those immediately upstream. It provides a key transportation corridor for anadromous fish, no spawning habitat and little rearing habitat. Wildlife-Limited herbaceous and woody vegetation has very little diversity and provides low quality habitat for small birds and mammals that are tolerant of a high degree of human disturbance . The creek receives limited use from waterfowl such as mallards. Wetlands-Approximately 15 to 20 feet of open water and 2 to S feet of herbaceous vegetation on each side of the channel can be classified as a lower perennial riverine wetland with and unconsolidated bottom. Hydrology-Hydrologic functions of this reach are the same as those immediately upstream . The existing man-altered channel will be replaced with a man-constructed channel between SW 16th and I-405 and between 1-405 and Grady Way . Water will flow in rectangular, concrete tubes under I-405 (see attached photos) . The right bank of the creel: wi I 1 be replaced with a vertical concrete wall , to prevent flooding of Oakesdale Avenue which is immediately adjacent the creek . The constructed channel will contain a low flow channel lined with gravel and cobbles, and approximately eight in- stream habitat structures such as anchored tree tops and root wads , rock deflectors and cluster of three to four large boulders . Approximately 520 shrubby-type willows will be planted along the edge of the water on each side of the �+ channel . The upper left bank will be planted with about 440 ser-vicaDerry , tail Oregon grape , chokecherry and red-osier dogwood . Woody vegetation wil'I be infrequently disturbed as required by maintenance activities . Function and Value— Fish-The constructed channel will not hinder the asovement of anadromous fish. In-stream habitat structures will provide resting areas for migrating fish . It is unlikely that spawning or rearing conditions will improve because of the silt lined bottom and poor water quality . Woody vegetation on the banks and overhanging the water will provide unproved shade and cover for fish . Wildlife-Plantings of willows and other woody species Will provide habitat for sma I I birds and rnarrrrna I s at least equal to existing habitat quality . Woody plants within the constructed channel will be subject to less mechanical disturoance than occurs presently . Wetlands-The quantity of open water and woody and herbaceous hydrophytes bordering the channel will equal existing conditions . Hydrology-The constructed channel and box culverts and components of a large flood control project that is designed to lessen the degree and frequency of flooding in the Springbrook Creek floodplain . The constructed channel is designed -to convey water thru this reach in a more hydr-auI ir--al I aft iC. ient. manner, especial dut- in:3 times of flooding . < Ivan Lines , C.W.B. State Biologist United States Soil '$ Department of Conservation Agriculture Service June 7 , 1993 1 Julian Meuer State Conservation Engineer W 316 Boone Suite 450 Spokane , WA. 99201 Re: ESGR P-1 Channel Design - Sta. 670+76 to 678+26 . 37 Dear Julian, -- Enclosed please find the P-1 Channel , Sta. 670+76 to 678+26 . 37 preliminary drawings and design for your review. Please call if you have a question or comment on this design. Sincerely, hLi)r Ie44kw-� David R. Dishman P.E. Civil Engineer cc : Rod DenHerder PE Keith Busch SDE • O United States Soil 935 Powell Ave SW Department of Conservation Renton,WA 88065 Agriculture Service (206) 764-3325 May 25, 1993 Scott Woodbury Storm Water Utility City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. S . Renton. WA. 98055 Re: P-1 Channel Dewatering Costs . Dear Scott , Enclosed please find for your peruse a copy of the P-1 Channel - Station 670+00 to 678+30. 37 Construction Dewatering Well Hydraulics and Cost Estimate. Please call if you have a question or comment concerning this analysis. Sincerely, David R. Dishman P.E. Civil Engineer cc : Rod DenHerder , PE Julian Meuer SCE Keith Busch, SDE OThe Sod Conservation Service is en agency of the Department of Agriculture CITY OF RENTON "LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator April 26, 1993 David R. Dishman, P.E. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service 935 Powell Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: P-1 CHANNEL PVC MEMBRANE Dear Mr. Dishman: We have reviewed your letter dated April 20, 1993 regarding a possible reduction in the dewatering requirements for membrane installation. We, however, request that you continue your design to include dewatering to 5 feet below the PVC membrane in accordance with the CH2M Hill report dated October 14, 1987. We do agree that someone knowledgeable with membrane installation be on-site during membrane installation. We, like SCS, do not have the expertise to perform quality. control services for this portion of the construction. We request that you include in your plans and specification, a provision which requires the contractor to retain the services of a qualified membrane installer who shall be on-site throughout membrane • installation. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at (206) 277-5547. Sincerely,, �C-eq WfU: J Scott Woodbury, Project Manager Surface Water Utility C:DOCS:93-420:SSW:ps CC: Ron Straka 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 THIS PAPER CONTAINS 50%RECYCLED MATERIAL,10%POST CONSUMER r`. �� United States Soil 935 Powell Ave SW Departrnent of Conservation Renton.WA 913056 \ j Agriculture Service (206)764-3326 April 20, 1993 Ron Straka Storm Water Utility City of Renton 200 Mill Ave . S . Renton WA. 98055 Re : P-1 Channel PVC membrane . Dear Ron, In a letter dated October 14, 1987 from Chris Sundberg of CH2M Hill to Bob Bergstrom of the City of Renton Mr. Sundberg states on page five that foundation preparation recommended for the PVC liner is to "Dewater to 5 feet below the excavation to remove water influence on subgrade materials" . This would require lowering the water table to elevation -10 in places . I recently had occasion to talk with Ms . Beth Woodward , the geomembrane "expert " at CH2M Hill and mentioned the dewatering requirement as set forth by Mr . Sundberg. Ms . Woodward was very involved with the original design of the P-1 channel PVC membrane and she felt that it would not be necessary to dewater a full five feet below membrane subgrade . Her concern in this area was to have a dry surface with which to work on so that sharp objects could be • identified and removed and so that the PVC seams could be properly joined . I suggested a dewatering requirement of one foot below subgrade and Ms . Woodward did not have a problem with that . In these days of high construction costs , dewatering to one foot vs . five feet below PVC subgrade could constitute a substantial cost savings for the City. Ms . Woodward also recommended that there be a person knowledgeable in geomembrane installation on site during installation. The SCS does not have the expertise to perform quality control services for this portion of the construction . Please let me know as soon as possible as to your decision on the extent of dewatering required for the membrane so that I can incorporate the information into the construction drawings and specifications . Sincerely, W141'e- David R. Dishman P.E. Civil Engineer cc : Rod DenHerder , PE Keith Busch, SDE 0 The Sod Conservation Service is an agency of the Oeparuneni of Agocullure Soil 935 Powdl Avea SW �. United States Rent Conservation rn.WA 98055 f 81 Department of (206)764-3325 Agriculture Service April 19 , 1993 John Malek Environmental Protection Agency Mail Stop WD-128 1200 6th Ave . Seattle , WA. 98101 Re: Green River Valley Flood Control Channel . Enclosed please find for your peruse , sediment quality data from Springbrook Creek in Renton WA. Also included are preliminary plans of the proposed enhancement of Springbrook Creek and a location map showing monitoring stations and the project location. According to the Draft Black River Basin Water Quality Management Plan there are contaminates present in the Springbrook Creek bottom sediments . In order to deal with these sediments in a responsible manner the SCS and the City of Renton would like to know what criteria the EPA uses in dealing with contaminated sediment . Specifically we would be interested in knowing: 1 . If the sediment quality data included in the Draft Black River _Basin Water Quality Management Plan would suffice for documentation of the existing condition of Springbrook Cr? 2 . What standard does the EPA use to determine acceptable levels of sediment contaminates? 3 . If sediments do require excavation and disposal , what type of disposal would be required? Rod DenHerder or myself will contact you the week of April 26 to discuss these question. In the meantime please call Rod DenHerder or myself at (206 ) 764-3325 if you have a question or comment . David Dishman P.E . Civil Engineer Soil Conservation Service • cc :Rod DenHerder ; SCS , PE O The Soil Conaervelion Service is an agency of the Department of Agriculture (f ')))) United States Soil 935 Powell Ava SW Department of Conservation Renton,WA 98055 Agriculture Service (206) 764-3325 April 19, 1993 Dr . David Kendall Seattle Dist . Corps . of Engineers Dredged Material Mgmt . Office P.O. Box 3755 Seattle , WA. 98124 Re: Green River Valley Flood Control Channel . Enclosed please find for your peruse, sediment quality data from Springbrook Creek in Renton WA. Also included are preliminary plans of the proposed enhancement of Springbrook Creek and a location map showing monitoring stations and the project location. According to the Draft Black River Basin Water Quality Management Plan there are contaminates present: in the Springbrook Creek bottom sediments . In order to deal with these sediments in a responsible manner the SCS and the City of Renton would like to know what criteria the COE uses in dealing with contaminated sediment . Specifically we would be interested in knowing: • 1 . If the sediment quality data included in the Draft Black River Basin Water Quality Management Plan would suffice for documentation of the existing condition of Springbrook Cr? 2 . What standard does the COE use to determine acceptable levels of sediment contaminates? 3 . If sediments do require excavation and disposal , what type of disposal would be required? Rod DenHerder or myself will contact you the week of April 26 to discuss these question. In the meantime please call Rod DenHerder or myself at ( 206 ) 764-3325 if you have a question or comment . David Dishman P . E . Civil Engineer Soil Conservation Service cc : Rod DenHerder ; SCS , PE O The Soil Conservation Service Uis an agency of the Department of Agriculture TELEPHONE CONVERSATION RECORD 'ROJECT: ESIa 2 Co n�e�f i�q CGia n n l 6�e 5� FROM: Dde� f�i5 h,-na rI T'O: Be �,lloocj'r�v� rd; Gh�Z J✓1 rl r t_�— ( So 3� z35 - SaZ Z SUBJECT:- ,le t X Gh.-�s - �r.��/✓-�r� . r4� 775� /S- /rryo✓ ,f /iI /�?.f{ 112��02� D fdG 1�•�r N i vt q s . United States Soil 935 Powell Ava SW Department of Conservation Renton.WA 98055 ` l Agriculture service (206) 764-3325 February 16 , 1993 Ron Straka Surface Water Utility City of Renton 200 Mill Ave . S. Renton WA. 98055 Re : P-1 Channel Design ; Sta. 670+31 to 678+30 Dear Ron , Enclosed please find for your review a preliminary design for the P-1 Channel between Grady Way and S.W. 16th St . Please review and provide comments to the SCS as soon as possible so that we may continue the design process to its completion . Because this design does not include the filling of the old channel there will not be enough area in the immediate vicinity of the project for spoils disposal . We would therefore like to spread spoils on the Puget Western property to the west of Springbrook Creek and south of SR405 . Because of this and the fact that there is very little room around the site for a project staging area it would be desirable to ac quire a construction easement for the property from Springbrook Cr. to the Westerly property line of the Drainage Dist . #1 (see attached map) . I will be contacting Joe Robel from the Dept . of Fisheries and Bob Winters from The Dept . of Transportation to get their reaction to this design concept during the week of Feb . 22 . Also enclosed please find a letter from Chris Sundberg of CH2M Hill to former City of Renton employee Bob Bergstrom concerning the impervious membrane which CH2M Hill has recommended be installed under the P-1 Channel . Hopefully this will help explain the necessity of the membrane to the current engineering staff at the City. Sincerely, David R. Dishman P. E. Civil Engineer Soil Conservation Service • cc: Julian Meuer, SCE The sod 6a,d,,,P,pxALJ"d e r, PE `.Jis an agency of the Department of Agriculture United Stales soil 935 Powell Ave. S. V. J E`� Department of Conservation Renton, WA. 98055 roriculture Sdrvice (206)764-3325 May 3, 1989 Don Monaghan , P.E. Eng . Supervisor City of Renton Sept. of Public Works 200 Mill Ave . South Renton, WA. 98055 Re : Oaksdale Ave . Seepage Control From P-1 Channel The Soil Conservation Service is in the process of designing the P-1 channel reach between Grady Way and SW 16th . As part of this project, Renton has requested that a 30 mil PVC impervious membrane be installed under the channel to control groundwater seepage to the Oaksdale Ave . under-drain system. In a letter dated Oct 14, 1987 (copy enclosed) from Chris Sundberg to Bob Bergstrom, some details of the liner are called out. We have incorporated these requirements in the channel design . We would like you to provide specifications for materials and installation of the liner. These will than be incorporated in our specifications for the project. We have preliminary drawings showing the channel design which we would be happy to provide to you . Sincerely , 4L 4aalo( DAVE DISHMAN , P.E. Civil Engineer Enclosure Tr1u Sod Consurvalion Survicn to arl uJu11cy OI Ihu Cl-VW1111n10 ul Ag1,cu11uru MEETING MINUTES DATE OF MEETING: May 24, 1989 PRESENT: Joe Robel WSDOF Rod Den—Herder SCS Dave Dishman SCS COPIES TO: Joe Robel Rod Den—Herder Dave Dishman Ivan Lines PROJECT: P-1 Channel — Station 671+94 to 678+30 ITEMS: Rod and Dave went over the drawings for the P-1 channel between Grady Way and SW 16th with Joe . We all discussed the fact that CH2M Hill is considering ► owering the impervious membrane in the vicinity of the low flow channel but that the liner would be no higher than elev . —3.0 at any place along the channel . Joe didn ' t have a problem with that as long as there was at least 5 ft. of earth above the membrane . We discussed the transition wall slab and Joe was not opposed to its ' construction . Joe was shown the drawings of the proposed fish habitat components and their locations in the low flow channel . Joe indicated that the components as shown on the drawings were satisfactory . The wildlife habitat planting plan was discussed . Joe ' s understanding was that willows would be planted between the gabion blocks but these were not a part of the planting plan . SCS said they would look into placing willows between *he gabion blocks . Clean—out of the low flow channel in the vicinity of the Metro pipeline crossing downstream of the Grady box culvert was discussed . It was pointed out by SCS that in order to have the base flow contained in the low flow channel and not inundate the entire channel bottom between Grady Way and SW 16th we could not afford the 0.5 ft of head loss that the clogged low flow was causing , and clean—out would be needed . Because it isn ' t certain when the channel will be constructed Joe decided to wait on the issuance of a permit for channel clean—out because the extent of deposition in the low flow channel might change . For additions deletions or changes to these minutes please contact Dave Dishman . Submitted by : David R . Dishman United Stales Sol 935 Powell Ave. S.W. Departmdn► of Conservation Renton WA. 9ttU55 aoricuhure survlce + (206)764-3325 J May 3, 1989 Don Monaghan , P.E. Eng . Supervisor City of Renton Sept. of Public Works 200 Mill Ave . South Renton , WA. 98055 Re : Oaksdale Ave . Seepage Control From P-1 Channel The Soil Conservation Service is in the process of designing the P-1 channel reach between Grady Way and SW 16th . As part of this project, Renton has requested that a 30 mil PVC impervious membrane be installed under the channel to control groundwater seepage to the Oaksdale Ave . underdrain system. In a fetter dated Oct 14, 1987 (copy enclosed) from Chris Sundberg to Bob Bergstrom, some details of the liner are called out. We have incorporated these requirements in the channel design. We would like you to provide specifications for materials and installation of the liner. These will than be incorporated in our specifications for the project. We have preliminary drawings showing the channel design which we would be happy to provide to you . Sincerely , 16W 4adllo( DAVE DISHMAN , P.E. Civil Engineer Enclosure Tnu Sall ConsYlvul an Sul.cn J\� •Yll a j.111:y 4I IIIY UYllallul.10 YI Al�rw YllWn United States Soil Department of Conservation tNNatioa1 �echnial C5er Agriculture Service rod way, oom Portland, Oregon 97209-3489 ( -Dro �� Subject: Cate: MGT - Trip Report, Direct Assistance, April 25, 1989 Renton, Washington, April 13-14, 1989 To: File Code: Lynn Brown, State Conservationist, SCS, 330 Spokane, Washington Purpose. Evaluate proposed environmental features for the P-1 Channel between Grady Way and S.W. 16th Street and establish acceptable design and analysis criteria. Participants. David Dishman, Civil Engineer, SCS, Renton, Washington Keith Busch, State Design Engineer, SCS, Spokane, Washington Leland Saele, Design Engineer, SCS, WNTC Background. This reach of the P-1 channel consists of two short sections between Grady Way and I-405, and I-405 and S.W. 16th Street. The channel layout is similar to the reach downstream of Grady Way except for the right and left banks. The right side of the channel is formed by a retaining wall constructed as part of the Oaksdale Street project and the left side is proposed as a gabion wall to contain the channel within the right-of-way and to improve visual resource. The Washington Department of Fisheries is requiring that fish habitat measures also be incorporated into the design. Findings/Recommendations. 1 . The design discharges are based on the 1980 amended work plan. These values are consistent with the design flows used for the reach immediatley below the Grady Way Box. The WSP2 computer program has been used for determining water surface profiles. 2. Channel design and stability analysis has been determined in accrodance with Practice Standard 582 and TR-25. The allowable velocities da,4.1 3fi7/,S8 established for the downstream reach (reference:Te p Pkp&+ C nex,C)�-to Evans^) will be satisfactory for this reach. Where flow velocity exceeds the allowable, gravel or rock lining will be provided. Channel roughness values were reviewed and appear consistent with the anticipated conditions for the "as built" and "aged" channel. 3. Fish habitat - Large organic debris (LOD) , such as logs and boulders will be anchored into the low flow channel to improve fish habitat. Designs similar to those developed for streambank jobs in western Washington are satisfactory. The low flow channel will be lined with nine inches of gravel to prevent local scour that might otherwise result because of turbulence around LOD. The channel roughness should be increased in the low flow channel to account for the LOD. O Lynn Brown 2 April 25, 1989 4. Gabion wall - The proposed design of the gabion wall, based on the Forest Service Design Manual procedures, appears satisfactory. The WNTC will review the design and check stability and inform Dave Dishman if there are any concerns. (A copy of our stability analysis is attached to this report. ) Feasibility of establishing vegetative plantings along the gabions should be discussed with the state agronomist and plan material specialist so that any special details can ben included in the design and on the drawings. 5. Three wingwalls are required on the job. Two on the left side up and downstream of the I-405 box and one on the left upstream side of the Grady Way box. The geologic reports indicate similar soil and foundation conditions at these locations. The desgin developed by Keith Busch for the Grady Way box wingwall can be used for these three wingwalls provided the dimensions of the wingwall and height of earthfill are essentially the same. 6. The WNTC should anticipate receiving the landscape plan for review in mid-May. The anticipated date for sending the final design to the WNTC for review is June 1 , 1989. The state is looking for final WNTC co-approval by June 15. I appreciated having this opportunity to work with Keith Busch and Dave Dishman. The design computations prepared by Dave for this project are well supported and documented. The preliminary drawings appear to be of excellent quality. This will help facilitate a timely review. LELAND SAELE Design Engineer Concurred: Enclosure _ REMARKS I' ' COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME QUAN. PLANT KEY prE� t e 6-1" Kr 1 pub • R ntMoDl cx - rr 1 Sslver Maple � Acor circi��lo 1-V• �4— _6•D - Rfd Pid•r 1 i/._[tea-. C� g lj A A4w fot:horinym Whit•Birch_- Fly., ,j to A Alm-----ruDra p•p ARfndul0 London PloneTH �c -.pip { , BaIL Blod Cotto^•oed_ G:e. op onv ocirif�a - 5 P>at �ofcoro_, -o nt hkhocorpo Stcghorn_Sumoc G_erM� p•, 11 _ Rhortvl+f purthlon0 Pocil,c MiUcr c pt RP pt,,jot p ,c -W„i�rn R�ds�dor — s'� i ,•ti. 'i+i' 'ts i+ Y� 10, J RT a 1di!o^ a Yltstern.Hfmloct -- 1 —____------_- 4 TP •u�f t,N•ro�Z _�----- - ---- -4'HT Ca l a r+c SHRUBS t / _ _Sc _ ca,n�rsx Paa Tv+ceberr s� 1N-.•!C 3 p_G Darr�. Ira. - ilerida G V1siNCf,d.'OG f adr•2 1Z utvf rn -- -1` �ourntr�/C, -Pacific Wati,rnTrilf._-- S •�- G01JIN-1CIC�'GG L r — � to - h frr Comm ?I� 7rtco tali anlco _ i++we�4oc. - - ed fb.re rinp Cunont G yf vrr� iniona a r^ wori Willow CC'"'1'�J�A d•� n•uflt get _C�'t.•_ ri7NTn n..t-:f�•. 3GC. sanqu' - r-- ovq s .Drrato__ -1 cr+_--- R ry- - 142.' r4oatdai4lO�--�---'— — ,rfr b- -HuckleDmY 2 l mpharcorpuf e! u_, E 4 oc ` Voccinum_owtum_ ------- 1 Vo __ --- WETLAND PLANTS W it — I rrf T.0 acoruf �I "r+T rc"'e+rnc+r^w _..r_ `� ,ram Tp d►ar 5r-cf� 4 4 ' • , ;�GTi� B-E! �jCGTtOJ A-A ?kyfe�a.so..s..tS.Wa.s.ktr)di<s..k6 . -4+9yF<rlc9 - _ �3 1 • • (• • • r . �r=r�ca ,1 i �� �� o�o •S •O •O •0 1 0—Iw. .,It -- 3 Y AtA.U1 ,l APR 1 3 ------ r, rip rr k,�" .t �✓ _ r. i MY, i�•F ���y'j" � �j'.�\Fl<.f v �S7c�+'✓ � ,, �^I�'y`Ivtt � `.,,,r vWV.,vuFC 1% t � 6 RPs+cYR.t_f�'1v '.P.t P is v�ri0� s U.S. DF.T'A it�'viF.NT OF �tr i` SOILCONSE .............. _ J !� ,�-,ji (•1 Q J Cp a T1C CIC�� a't+sr fr4K its RM _-� —te �" WILT �t `; .i �r'.`t,1�IRt;k f t r p ti PRELIMINARY SUBJECT TO REVISION ELEV. 15 0 -� 3 x3 GABIGN BASKET 3 x 4,5 GABIGN BASKET ' % LOW FLOW CH14NNEL DOTTOM 3 x. 6 GABIGN BASKET �0. WASTE SEWER 1.4 { r 2.5 E 1 LEV, 2.5 4 _ ELEV, 2,6 S,�3 REND MATT VARIES VARIES -� 1 1 - 3 w .' -- -- � - 12,0 7.5 2.9 60:0 INV. ELEV. -5.72 7:3 P - 1 CHANNAL CROSS SECTI ❑ N STA , 672 + 50 ( APPROK ) U.S.DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SPEED MEMO PART NUMBER DATE ` ! r q TO Sc D * Lo YYl�e rt 2 3 2 P�3 i SUBJECT � 6 OM �aC�P, ��-`�f�7G'rI MESSAGE , �r�c lc�sc�1 /��se �rr�r Prof m�nef ry + SQ ` 6 0 ,-A rt f t t l� f pled i'l1 t v4�kt •MATUxyevw REPLY NATURE DATE (DESTROY THIS PART 2 UPON RECEIPT OF REPLY.) FORM AD-311 (REV. 3/81) \ ccmncQ+c nnav MEMORANDUM OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION #1 Subject: Clean out of P-1 L.F. Chan Date : 3/17/89 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: Dave Dishman : To : Joe Robel W.D.O.F ----------------------------------- ------------------------------------ In order to design the Connecting ' channel portion of the P-1 channel : with a defined Low Flow channel it will be necessary to clean out the Low Flow portion of the P-1 just down stream of the Grady Way Box where a gravel deposition has occured . This will eliminate the 0.5 ' loss of head in this area and insure that the invert of the channel between Grady Way and S.W. 16th is in the dry under normal low flow conditions . : Joe is skeptical that this will : work but is willing to give permission : to clean it out. This would be : incorporated into the hydraulics : permit for the connecting channel : job . } s OiUNITED STATES SOIL W. =20 Riverside , Rm. 361_z DEPARTMENT GE CONSERVATION Spokane, Na. 99201-1 t0=:0 AGRICULTURE SERVICE ------------------------------------------------------------ BATE: /16/&—` SU i . BIi_iL-Tr i p Report-Renton iAlr'_•r !.if f i ce-:/13- 4/is}9 TO: Gary T i b k e , SRC: cc-Henry, Renton DenHerder , Renton Lj i sl-!man,y Renton Easter , i::i ; •,mpia Meuer ., Spokane Lambert . Spokane Fisher , Olympia Purpose: ( 1 ) To evaluate wildlife habitat plantings an Spr i n2brr,r_'k: Creed; in the last Side Green River W3 y (2) To develop a conceptual channel design , incorporating fish and wi l d i i fe hab i,fat,. f.eatiure:s, From Grady ihay to SW 16tht . Accomp l i shlments •ac9tt- Lambert , Greg i=i s_hler` and i reviewed as-bu i It AraQVNgs, Qf f Psh and w i l d l i fe habitat s i a.nt i n s on Springbr-c'r+i•:: Cheek: from River Green to Grady Way. Wealso wa l l••,er Most ofthe creek nt-+t i no the survival and density of woody plantings . Green River to Monster Ro a Br- i acie-common ! y referred to as the "outlet channel " . This area was planted following construction in ! •- _"_ with about 115 trees and 1000-1 _00) shrubs . Less than 1% of this material survived for a variety of reasons including grass competition and no follow-up maintenance , fire , and several construction activities i nc i ud i ng p i pe l i ne installations and railroad bridge removal . This area should be totally replanted-approximately 100 1 feet 4n the eit bank: aitd appr'tX imate i `{ 250 feet ( below the railroad bridge ) on the right bank. . Ali p t ar!t • r'gs ai•t'+u i d be below the top of the bank and above the rip-rap in three rt'°.s in a 3 ' spacing . ppri-ximate y 1200 pIisnt;s are needed . The p i ant i n?_:i site for each tree and shrub shout o we prepared by scalping i:•t'f the duff and ve yezat i on on a. minimum of a _`: ' :. ' area.. Su i tao l e species i nc i ude red-osier dogwood , chokecherry, v : .-•_- li%aip i ie ( i'n .t4ie top row only) , 'ho ,, i rE ; , service-Derry and ra.4 myrtle . r_+e n._ vegetation must be controlied around each p i a.nt a minimum A twice a year for minimum+ of two This e e ..� 'f ._. CiY t C i Ll.it .. ".�wt_ years .c r"= t _ can rt either{':e; C+ . done manually or withherbicides . The estimatea '� cost i 11 ,>_00 for plants and planting , and ,f0 for air!'l:erii'.'nce . s Monster Road_ Bi- i d'7e to P-'1 Pump F'' i <ty -• 1 E{ t :a area wasC+:constructed in -tile early ._1 ,�1 0 i s artCi never i-t i anted Wit i t cic,tjy ii'iater i a i . 1t Is present I ywe i I yi? e'<<.te 1 W 4 D a C i'f ll p I ants arl+_I We i I as 1 nvad i ng spec i EYs 1i3t:it s i tarsi rta:» and blackberries . xVege-tat i i3ri on •th i S react"! ;7ir"i?Se:'tt i '4' _ir"0`✓ Ci.ie_, fa ? r" to food + i sI-i and w i I d 1 ! 1' e 1'iaJ i i'a. , i`Io {:i ! ci..:t j l_+r s are recommenced is i (7 1 is reat::l-I .. _ P-1 For r-L!a`d-!ite i eI t .+art1•:; t1-If t;h 1 s -Voi'ebav ani-J i4 .'s 1 art+_I CC+msi i ex W',:,S In i :ari ::et_ w i tit wi»i{ti.3V m..a'!:ier i a.l t C. 1 1 C.kV I ri'`t i CitrtS'i ruCt ? i»ir! ni '=��::i t»ir" .i. '�i= ti i-1t ! S 3h"f?a :t prec;e.r: o C C it p i e d b y 4' F i'F:'*i r t i t e n s ? -'r ++'1 p 1 a in't e iS a rt(J i rl''y!1 Q i rt 3 w 0 0 a y p i arttS . T r!e t_tr ? '-.+ i tta : p i art t. ? iigs w e r a 1I1it uavtse eri it t(•:t In provide good' "t and i t t;t i . 'i'e habitat andGi'1ti'V !Ia'Ve s U t f e r_oil a iv t t .t to i' -. , -... ... + i'S �+pit t; t t i a i t: ? I<.. t 11!i.+r t::.;. ! "v i ..In c��:rn i -t ? n w i t 1'{ 1{er1!a.Cerjus +'i i :7Ln'.:'s ani-: sa i ! -aCl'; ci v` ':fia i !1 Zki?11anIne r1 I S area snoui +,•t tie inter--:7i .rc=:erl ion, file ef'._jG the 4ia'1:et' aRrl itrt ::rte S I tl(i;� '.L(iC,Vle ti11(? (i la. i ri'rErta?1re b e r Ttl. A p p r i:+x, ? rina1.e i y -=+i!1% o7' the *2*5 0 T e't toj ._':iir.e ? ( rie srtisiCi i d r._e r'e(:+ 1 an-(.ed w i tit a S i rt q I e r i»F w, r wi i I { ,-i k j G1 i': i i-+ i i i"i Y f is i is t s i:. C i rF g F1 1:1 tj r +;: i 1'fc mac.'i= i rJ 5'`' I ' rt I a r' r" ) h+: it i _l �rr5 1 a t'"':a l? �i-} �?rl.. i i� i i� %F C+i rt M -i=4a j•-.:, r. + i tie 11 l .1('i t e d, i rt .Jt'i»+i1C»i'o JT _ i;i:+ :ii F ? xii"JCiF u.='iiVe u1tf: k'R .ir!':erlctrtCe aeh'((i t:+ 'Y i i i t rl 1 a t"! E::' ct.r e ci.S +:+r a'_.i N(1 L- i y { i.C K: i ri'=t t:j t;i t:;t t_I y V­3 e'i;ri[; I o! :. l�l i I o s Can b? f_i i ?.rIted us 4 n9 wh i its w i tit riCi s i �ce 7t" 17at"a'G i +_+1l -- ior" r•1=(1i^isegIS� ?'!ta t !:?:erta,ni` e necessary. CCir{ i P ei s t!_+ __=! i ! >_in i-+r g F`t" YP t ::a.t I'% :+:i I rt't i»i a i. _ r'a: ?:J s; i i,e a fe d j.:;e�'i't r e e 5 t C:: e y e•:..i" i. r 'a,t i e a.S•:. ;»+ 's3;;�r..., . ,7 t l I 4 isr,ef i is 7 1.ustr : Sri i t»+dgelm.% I e , ',-3-Co.tch. and [tilfli3er'i:i5d. i:+ i ri e t i{fi•`t. e i [i i 5 i '.:; d.ti{i i j 1; 152500 i t t t" -s i a rt L= c:.i'i•-i tJ 1 ;.r!'t 1 ri'_I r i� -:r- (- .� i•i: ,-i i+ - cons .f [ t_t`_i i. a i rt;: I .e it itI . �.r. _ . dl rnai ri e!"iancr, 1r after p i ant: i rt s 0,her"W i se r?-jai rtterlar{Ce nay f+e s i .]rt i + t_a v (; i ':t r.._. "w Il i ._ r a a i 'is a ? rt 3 i rt e 01 s e::+a t--El e i _i_ ..-: '.. .. 1 r ,Y i�\:' > " tit ! S �Y i''e Fa. w3�.t I�+ 1 ii i"t'r,e it ti+4 '1:i'! -(-I. e i­ i .. it ! ','t j _ ti:c.� ale rnFk..r ! a ( r ite . t.a a!i fir• t`.••�r!t'•:S ''i±.` �: i"' 'r 9 i:i .-:r Y":r . - 'O W i i I'� S-a it: +�i;. . '"t r_ _ ( r L.iirf is?'d.t. +.itt" S ir st ? ._r .t t _. _ }..{':1 Ci is :: l::_I 7a.;' I V :+ '.S 3 +:1 t3+ :»+;�t-r`. %'ri+_i wi:1 1 t.. 'c : i.' , 3 _ ;::1 cy .. ... _e i'_. i ! �'+`'+.i i^+;-: r; .. . .:..;.. :f l ;,e I -. : :^<:r::•t ..+. .i i_i - r' :. i-,•r;ri +a s t :r e; �1 i i s{:,-I r e ,,ar ci ., 5 ..,. ? ci +a ..1 r i ,..I;.. i-.1 1` + O L4 ..t.:i?!!{"• .. t.: r ._ _ _. .. + is t ix. .. _. _. _ _ C+ :. -•i i i_ a.' :i .. i i..i 73. i ., i ;lt, + +: 1`1 C t' I.?a_: .. +: ;, :... t.:; .- i.,..i r: ' ti ._:+ i S. 1.... .=1_tl t ! _ . \ ^ ^ red-osier dogwood , sumac , ptLoti_nia`, and rose . Both sioes of the low f } ow channel should be replanted with three rows of willow whips on a 343' spacing . However , we � i The estimated cost of planting this reach is about s10,000 . for the wi ( | ows , $11r000 for toe shrubs and $2000 for two years maintenance. In addition we recommend the Following conditions for a ! ( future vegetative contracts : ( 1 ) The vegetative contract shou | d be ' et as a separave contract from the construction contract . This wK \ a | | ow us to deal directly with a primp contractor that has the interest and expertise to do a Sood Job . (2> Approximately 30% of the total contrict money snouid be withheld until tne contractor compietes any requ . red replacement p / anvinSs after ti`e first growing season . (3) All plantings shouid oe covered oy a maintenance contract during the estab | ishmeot 9e, ioo--at . east two years--to control comPetinS vegezat / on , re-stake , etc . (4) The Area Foreste' of State Piano i"nteriuis 1pecia | ist should be designated as too government 'epres"ntanive for the vegetative c:ntracts and be present to n,amine ail plant materials oefore they are planted , ourmq toe actual planting , and to f0iow t|`rou8h with z.`e maintenance contractor . (5) Ail trees aon qo/�:s n . aP+po on con upppr tanks should ne pianted in�o a sv � . Ypn `' / n'ri �? nrea. now base of the piant n,n�ewad ' . ^'^ '�QR,; § ' '. . A � — � su / rabi * otastic tub ioS , and toe nnr ' Aa siv+ i';?r ^'pp«-fy on 'or a x ; nimum of two yeurv . (6) Bare root anu cwn` v / "~r 17oc/ shu / , be p / anteo on trat ai : toe ro,"s 0~0 , r^ ~'e'� 'Y sail � `y-r of `nr/ nuich 2- Wcrns inicx , in . p`. Wu —Cunx r, + Oaso oe eacm Ylact , bieter eaci p ,; r : v ­ W.' 7 z57 ' "o . A Us n . ~ 'equ / red ar:una en�� - s.`; ;o Ania watpr fron a win ^.u^. of o.�e irrigat ' o^ Y-r +nch " 'on au'/e '.Kru Spnvemher of t`� first growing ;ea, :x . (7) Piaoted s�oc/ s^a ! o , A-\niion i . re oJ apnroximn�e ' v � to 4 feet taii . --'' ;.-In Tuesuay Rod Denk*r' e' ' ?Ave 04oma` , 5'`b MAdoen , 37nnc '-amoert aou 1 met w; ,o Jo^ Ronal T~om ^:`e Was: insron ^ . ' " Department of Fisheries regarding the design of the channel from Grady Way to SW 16th. We discussed severa \ alternatives for incorporating fish and wi ( Kife habitat mitigation features . We agreed on tKe fo ) | owin3 : ( 1 ) We will create one meanoer in one tow fiow channe . between SW 16tn and I-+05 with a strai2ho ctao'e ; bezweeo Grady Way znd 1-405 because of toe | imited space in the latter reach . ' (2) We will add groups of > arSa 02-2 ' diameter ) boulders anu logs and root-wads tied into the bank every 10 to 20 \ inea \ feet of channel . (3) Tne | ow fiow coaooei - iji be 11r *ri 4 | th ^^cK 6... sufficient size to prevent it from erown2 and shifting position. ' (4) The bench immeoiaze / ' aysve aoe in, f / ow oKanne | will be designed to oe 6 to 12 ipcnes out vQ nA water from Aprii � thru October 1 to * ro, o ^�e a Eu . vAb ! s . / �ov ' pq s : te for shrubby willows alon, NO ease O` t^* 0- Vi ., apy:nn ! .^ (3) The right sank of tne coanne , is a vert | ca | concrete wa | | . The low Tiow cnan:et wi | ) be �=,t a or , ` o 'o tn . s waii as possib ' e to 1 . iow adequotr Foac * + ii Vj plantings. (6) The left oaok wi ' | oe Lui ` n with 1 341 s : ope and toppec witn approximateQ woree ofMer rows of Sas . 00s , Cho eart - s ( ope wi { | be 0iotod to adapted shruos . An atve.^*c wi | : 6e made to estab | / sh a horizonvai �nlrnt ' n8 of wi ` | ows oerween the ~ow of gab ( ons . �- - ��'�{�L� ( 1 ) Pot Deovorder w / \ | Mk to the pump p . a..t operator n,o jar',ai / y notify Ki ''3 pointy of the ngrae,- ,o Y,r ± �, wo p� ,vp / s . T ' toe c:unwy will not agree to onArRoe ohe ?u:n n ' aot as ves ' 3nec we shou : d either s,spe,d fii,rc : a 'Ina 711 �r / cai ass / stnocy oo who rroject or .eclsrp n '*s ..c , / A ' Onny nau reouiii ;Te nenc'' aians T''e . �k ,''w , Scort Lambert wi ' | vr*rn.' = rinn i ieo �a4nt , ..3 p ; ars on s �ecir � cation� for x `'emt, njv + when cequestod to '-1 -0 . nc^vt .a`"p'n - r 0re1 ,- js"sr w ! n h» ine ivsi . ' , ''jo � `v ,` ..'`" `� � ��e�'�s�r. ta� . /� �o ; `,:QC :* nursery stocz aAd Q ~e` . 9e �:� ; . a^ ^' ns .a' v ; s . 11 / 7 , ; ' 17 �^'A w ' VA J,.We 5 . s.'oAA Rcott Lambert avi woe ",Doi ;. lpiete voe Jpj ' un j t,!, 70ann* / ,'' x. .' ` 0} `'ax `.S � ' i6;^ . �t��e Bio � ^� ist Engineers - Planners Economists - Scientists April 19, 1989 SEA21810 .K2 Mr. Don Monaghan City Engineer City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98005 Dear Don: Subject: Oakesdale Avenue Roadway Springbrook Creek/P-1 Box Culvert Construction Modification The following is a followup to our letters dated December 5, 1988 , to you, and our letter dated December 8 , 1988 , to Joel Robel/State of Washington, Department of Fisheries, on the above-referenced subject. Enclosed you will find a proposed plan and sections for a reinforced concrete slab to be cast at a future date between the invert of the SR 405 box culvert structure, currently being constructed by the Washington State Department of Transportation, and north transition wall, which was incorrectly located approximately 9 feet north of the box culvert structure. This modification to the channel would be constructed at a future date when SCS receives funding for the remaining P-1 channel improvements. We estimate the total cost for the concrete slab to be approx- imately $6, 100. (See attached cost estimate. ) As stated in our December 5 letter to you, we have deducted $4 ,430 on our October 24 , 1988 , invoice (invoice No. 904118) and consider this matter to be closed. We have requested written approval for this modification from both SCS and Fisheries and will forward copies of their approval letters to you upon receipt. CH2M HILL Seattle Office 777108th Avenue,N.E.,Bellevue,Washington 206.453.5000 P.O.Box 91500,Bellevue,Washington 98009-2050 Mr. Don Monaghan Page 2 � j April 19 , 1989 SEA21810 .K2 Please call me if you have any further questions. Si erely Sun P.E. Resident Engineer pla/seSE5/008 Enclosure cc: Ken Glasby/CH2M HILL Mike Mariano/CH2M HILL Linda Korbus/CH2M HILL +-David-Dishman/SCS' • United States Soil t 935 Powell Ave SW Department of Conservation Renton W A 98055 Agriculture Service May 9 , 1989 i Mr . Chris Sundberg , P. E. CH2M HILL 777- 108th Avenue P. O. Box 91500 Bellevue , Washington 98009-2050 Dear Chris : Re : ESGR P-1 Channel , Impervious Membrane Renton , Washington Enclosed is a copy of relevant specifications and drawings relating to placing the impervious lining under the P-1 Channel. With your input we will write the excavation and fill specification for the impervious liner. We would , however , prefer that CH2M HILL write the spec for the impermeable lining itself . I have discussed the rooting of willows with our Plant Material Specialist (an expert on willows ) at the Oregon Plant Material Center . He indicated that these bushy type willows have fibrous roots (no tap root ) and would not go through the lining if they • went that deep . Because of the shallow depth to water it is highly unlikely that the willow roots will extend to the depth of the lining . If there is any way that we can help or if you need additional information , please call Dave Dishman or me at 764-3325 . Sincerely, 10 Roderick L . Den-Herder , P.E. Project Engineer cc : Charles Price , City of Renton Dave Dishman , SCS , Renton l O The Soil Conservation Service Vis an agency of the Department of Agriculture I, I, t f 1 i i 4 C f v I' i t AGREEMENT AND EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE. CHANNEL 6 THIS AGREEMENT made this day of between PUGET WESTERN, INC. , ate]-'as-h-'i-ngton c .oration 1988, Western" herein) , and CITY OF RENTON, ( "Grantp Puget ee" herein) ,• WHEREAS, Puget Western is the owner of a parcel of land in the Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , King County, Washington; and WHEREAS, Grantee desires an easement for a drainage channel across Puget Western ' s land at a location more described herein below; specifically NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10. 00) and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in consideration of the performance by Grantee of the covenants, terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, Puget Western hereby quitclaims to Grantee the following easement9rants , conveys and A. A nonexclusive perpetual easement over, across, along, in, upon and under that portion of described in Exhibit "C Pugct ' s Western ' s land " attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof for the purposes of installing, operating, maintaining, removing, repairing, la constructing, using a drainage channel , together with the nonexclusive rightcingand of ingress to and egress from said portion of Puget West-ern ' s foregoi:zg purposes ; land for the • The terms "Easement" and "Easement Area" in this ins trument refer to the easement herein granted on Puget Western ' s Property described in Exhibit "Cl, . This Easement is granted subject to and conditioned following terms, conditions and upon the covenants which Grantee hereby promises to faithfully and fully observe and perform. 1 . Cost of Construction and Maintenance . Grantee bear and promptly pay all co shall sts and expenses of construction and maintenance of the drainage channel . 2• Compliance with Laws and Rules . The Grantee shall construct , maintaln and use the drainage channel in accordance with any statute, order, rule or regulation of any public authority having jurisdiction . 3 . Use of the Easement Area by Puget Western. Puget Western reserves the rights to develop and use the lands encumbered by this easement for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights granted herein . Puget Western reserves the right to construct improvements, such as buildings, parking and landscaping, over portions of the Easement Area upon consent of Grantee, which consent Grantee agrees shall enot lbe the unresonably withheld, having due regard to Grantee ' s facilities . tIn no event shall Puget Western be allowed to construct a build ' at grade over the box culvert . building Puget Western shall not be liable for any loss or damages to Grantee ' s facilities resulting from Puget Western' s use of the lands encumbered by this easement unless such loss or damage is due to negligent acts or omissions Western acyree, to ,uc„ of Puget Western . Puget reasonable. care. 4. Termination for Cessation of Use. In the event Grantee ceases to use the drainage channel for its intended use for a period of five (5 ) successive years , this ll Grantee ' s rights hereunder shall terminateAanderevertment ntoapuget Western. s -1 of 3- 2-DC-5867 .,vnc,cri[,tv� AND EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE CHANNEL P(JGET WESTERN, INC. - CITY OF RENTON 5• Release of Draina a Channel on Termina termination of this tion. No Agreement shall release Grantee from any liability or obligation with respect to any matter Occurring to such termination, nor shall such termination release Grantee lor from its obligation and liability to remove the drainage channel facilities from Puget Western' s parcel and restore the ground . 6. Removal of Drainage Channel on Termination . Upon any termination of this Agreement, Grantee shall promptly remove the Easement Area its drainage channel from facilities and restore the ground to the condition now existing or, in the alternative, take such other mutually agreeable measures to minimize the impact of the drainage channel on Puget Western ' s Property. Such work, removal and restoration shall be done at the sole cost and expense Of Grantee and in a manner satisfactory to Puget Western. In case Of failure of Grantee to so remove the drainage channel facilities , restore the ground or take such other mutually agreed upon measures , Puget Western may, after reasonable notice to Grantee , remove the drainage channel facilities , restore the ground or take such measures at the expense of Grantee , and Puget Western shall not be liable therefor . 7 • Third Party Rights . Puget Western reserves all rights with respect to its property including,right to grant easements, licenses and without limitation, the to the rights granted in this AgreementPermits to others subject 8• Release and Indemnity. indemnify and promise to defend and rsave e aress does hereby release, from and against any and all liability, lossml costpu damag�stern expense, actions and claims, including costs and reasonable attorney' s fees incurred by Puget Western in defense thereof, asserted or arising directly or indirectly on account of or out of ( 1 ) acts or omissions of Grantee and Grantee ' s servants, agents employees, and contractors in the exercise of the rights herein, or 2 9 granted ) acts and omissions of Puget Western in its use of Puget ' s Property which affect Grantee ' s employees, agents, contractors , and other parties benefiting from said drainage channel ; provided, however, this paragraph does not purport to indemnify Puget Western against liability for damages arising out Of bodily injury to persons or damage to property caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of Puget Western or Puget Western ' s agents or employees . 9• Title . The rights granted ubject to permits , leases, licenses andeasements, if any, sheretoforre granted by Puget Western affecting the property subject to this Agreement . Puget Western does not warrant title to its property and shall not be liable for defects thereto or failure thereof . 10. Notices . Unless otherwise required ttices o be In writing under this Agrreement provided h shall�beogiven as r"'�follows �l If to Puget 9 Western: Puget Western, Inc. One Bellevue Center, Suite 1100 411 - 108th Avenue N.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 If to Grantee: City ^f per.tc:. 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, WA 98055 ATTN: ' Director Public Works Notices shall be deemed effective, if mailed, upon the second day following deposit thereof in the United States Mail , postage prepaid, certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, -2 of 3- 2-DC-5867 ^,UAr.GMLNT AND EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PUGET WESTERN, INC. • - CITY OF RENTON or upon delivery thereof if otherwise given. Either change the address to which notices Party may may be given b as above provided . y giving notice il . Successors . The rights and obligations of the partie shall inure to the b penefit of and be binding upon their res ectsive successors and assigns . 12. Liability. In the event of any assignment o hereunder, the liability of Grantee and its assigneesfs the hallrbghts joint and several . EXECUTED as of the date hereinabove set forth. ACCEPTED: CIT OF RENTON PUGET WESTERN, INC. By Ear Cl mer, a or By ay or President ATTEST: L�4/�.a�✓ Maxine L. Motor, CMC, City Clerk STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) SS. On this V undersigned } day of �'L�,�c'y 1988, before me, the Personally appeared W.the President of PUGET WESTERN, INC. ,E. WATSON, to me known to be he executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledgedlon saidhinstrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation f the uses and Purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument . or WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written. Notary Public 1n and or the .,State o Washington, residing at �; •� My commission expires -3 of 3- 2-DC-5867 CITY OF RENTON PUGET WESTERN TARGET SURVEYORS, INC. Job No. 86-16B •.` January 28, 1988 (Puget Western Property) (PARCEL "C") LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of said puthwest quarter (SW4) of the ortheast quarter NE4 and northwest quarter (NW ) of the southeast quarter (SE ) of Section 24, Townshi 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. described as follows: p Commencing at a concrete monument in case which marks the east quarter corner of said section; Thence north 0035153" east along the east line of said section 245.37 feet to the southerly margin of State Route 405 as approveddistance 1961 ; Thence south 86019151" west along said margin a distance of 130 intersection with the east line of said subdivision and the TRUE POINTeOFto an BEGINNING; Thence continuing south 86019'51" west along said margin a distance feet, a point which is 140.98 feet southwesterly of the centerline o of oppose Oakesdale Avenue S.W. as measured at right angles f Proposed shown on the 1 �� thereto,plans entitled Oakesdale Avenue S.W. improvements, 16thlstreet to S.W. Grady Way", dated September 25, 1987, as prepared by CH M Hill City of Renton; 2 for the Thence south 28045131" east parallel to said cent rline, a distance to the easterly line of the northwest quarter (NW4) of the southeastofua ter fE Of said section; quarter (SE ) Thence north 0055153" east along said subdivision line a distance of the northeast corner of said subdivision; 78.60 feet to Thence north 0053149" east al section a distance of 104ong the easterly line of the southw POINT OF BEGINNING. est 4 of the northeast quarter (NE ) of said .36 feet ter ) to thhee The bearings and distances herein refer to the certain survey entitle Avenue Southwest Control and Topographic Survey' for the City of Renton through three dated April 20, 1986 under Job No. 86-16 and al on Exhibit d "Oakesdale Map No. 1 which by this reference is made a part hereof. so shown sheets one p��TRIC.7 ►.lQ I DRAIN AGE ;4. 32'I2 j 24 19 up , 20 ' 20 � ` `v\ R�45.ods�' �1:54'4 SWW4NE4 OF L�4).o�. a 0 12,411 SQ.Ft I 0.2649 A C. In U) o Cv a' 31,1O4 �s. „• 54. FT. y . m 0.7291 AL. `Y ' in r,Poe - -✓—_ - 0► 1 cl-IoRD�.S.8(c• 'Sf�W.134.D� NBc.' I�•51' �... � 13�9,58 � ./ I CASEp MON U. N 0l+_ I 1'C '1� 305 12 Mr (TYPICAL) 191Co.lb4 IQ , l0 1 Est VOO ks'92C10,O'_ -4 05 5 R. I 'r 1 O p,O fib ` \ Ld 7 p \ I ✓5.bc.'1�''S1•W. \Ir � 134o.Lj -� l� C~ ui FU 0.2094 AC. o d b z N,87'3g��� 133g,po� 9 CORN f_R ,6 n. NW4 SP_4 0 l Wdksy, Cf, EAST LINE OF NW45 A } c ---,.I C�y �s cp sS�AFC/STEREO � -- oNq� LAND S.W. (oM� ST. i _.X H I I T M a P ° 5T7 JOB NC ,.... �i��:1 PU GET U N 16 I w A L THIS SI'ACF.RLSERVED FOR RPCORDER USL WESTERN, INC. • Filed for Record at Request of: NAME CITY OF RENTON ADDRESS 200 MILL AVENUE S0. CITY AND STATE RENTON WA 98055 Quit Claim Deed THE GRANTOR, PUGET WESTERN, INC., a Washington corporation, for and in consid TEN and NO 100 DOLLAR 1 cration of nd r quit claims to CITY OF RENTON a munici al cor oration the following described real estate, situated in the County of Kin State of Washington: • See Attached EXHIBIT "A-1" SUBJECT TO: Easements, restrictions, covenants and reservations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this instrument to be executed b i day of 1L1,, �� 19 y is proper officer this Approved and Accepted by: CITY OF RENTON PUGET WESTERN IN . By By ✓ �� c �t, � �/, , PRESIDENT By STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY 01= �j i��y ss. CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT On this _-z day of AA' )^ , the undersigned, personal! appeared PPeared W. E. WATSON ' 19 BLE ---, before me. to me known to be the Is Ihecorporationthatexecuted�theforre going instrument,and acknowled acknowledged act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that g the said instrument to be the free and voluntary authorized to execute the said instrument. *'NESS my hand and official seal he reto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the-StC of Washington•, residing at V/) - MY commission explres QUIT CLAIM DEED PUGET WESTERN, ' INC. TO CITY OF RENTON • EXHIBIT PARCEL A That portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East , W.M. , Washington, described as follows : in King County, Commencing at the Southwest corner of Tract B, Washington Technical Center as recorded in Volume 122 of Plats, pages 98 along the southerly line thereof 112 . 08 feet to a po through 102, records of said county; thence North 77 27 30 ast int ,on"aLcurve having a radius of 740. 00 feet, the radius South 86°56 ' 16" West thence southerly alongosaidocurvec71 . 45rs feet ; thence South 2 28 ' 12 " West 5. 39 feet to a line parallel with and 75 . 00 feet southerly, when measured at right angles from the southerly line of Tract B, and the True Point of Beginning North 77027 ' 30" East along said parallel line 54. 91 feet ; thencece South 18 57 ' 05" East 55. 55 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 40. 00 feet and being tangent to the northerly right-of-way line of Grady Way, said curve an arc length of 65 . 64 feet to saidcnortherlye to the llineeft aof Grad Way; f Y y; thence South 67 01 ' 39" West along said northerly right-of-way line 78. 14 feet to the beginning of a curve to t he right having a radius of 40. 00 feet ; thence along said curve an arc length of 80. 59 feet ; thence North 2 28 ' 12" East 56. 45 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing 7, 498 square feet, more or less . • �niti�s 4 DC 5852 021288 QUIT CLAIM DEED PUGET WESTERN, INC. TO CITY OF RENTON E X 11 I BIT "A-1" PARCEL "B" That portion of the southwest Section 24, Township 23 North, Rangee 4 East), of H.M h des northeast quarter (NE4) of monument in case described as follows: Commencing at a concrete said Section; a which marks the East Quarter corner of Thence North 0035153" East along the East line of said Section a 445.93 feet to the Northerly margin of state route 405 as approved October of 1961 ; PP October 31, Thence south 86019151u west along said margin a distance of 1339 intersection with the east line of said subdivision; •58 feet to an Thence continuing along said northerly margin a distance of 10. which is 39.00 feet northeasterly of the centerline of proposed Oa planS.H., as measured at right angles thereto, as said center 88 feet to a point plans entitled "Oakesdale Avenue S.W. improvements, S.W. kesdale Avenue , dated September 25, Avenue as prepared b line it Street t on the the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Y CH Hill forhtherCitytof Renton, Thence north 2804531" west fe a point of curvature of aptangent curve to the rigarallel to ht ha distance of 156.95 feet feet; 9 Ong a radius of 45.00 • Thence northerly along the arc of said curve, throw 54°4J'59", a distance of 43.04 feet to a 9h a central angle of Grady Nay right of way, which point bears 63057132he utrly margin of S.H. centerpoint of said curve; West from the Thence south 66058102" west along said margin a distance Of easterly margin of Drainage District No. 1 right of way as es abli feet to, the County Superior Court Cause No. 32912; shed in King Thence in a southerly direction in along said easterly mar110031591, distance of 23.30 feet; 9 south west a Thence south 290031591, west a distance of 58.33 feet; Thence south 7018,59" west a distance of 60.55 feet to the north margin of said S.R. 405 right of way; Thence northeasterly along said margin, on a centerline 20001, curve to the right, an ar distance of 134.90 feet to a point 200.00 feet spiral highway station of 147+220, from which the previouslyde Sint of tangent having a 86 01158" West a distance of 134.89 feet; described point bears South Thence continuing along said margin north 86°19'51" east to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. a distance of 130.36 feet The bearings and distances herein refer to the certain Avenue Southwest Control and Topographic Survey" for th through three dated April 20, 1986 under Job Nu survey entitled "sheetson P 1 which by this reference is e City of Renton sheets one Exhibit Ma No. tuber 86-16 and also shown on The intent of this legal description i_ made a part hereof. establshed in ac.'.ior, 9n SuYe , to Moir;;;ic;_ 1Yith the r resolved to the meri or Coult Causc No. 32912 the bearingsOf way beas en dian as stated upon said Target Surveyors Survey. • ��iti�s 66-DC-5854 021288 CT:tg FROPOSED NO. 8 7 -- 7 7 J I MOTION NO. '7 0 2 8 2 A MOTION providing for subrogation of certain easements for flood control and related purposes to the City of Renton for those portions of the Green River 4 Eastside Watershed Project known as the 5 P-1 Drainage Channel. 6 WHEREAS, King County owns certain property intended for use in 7 constructing those portions of the Project known as the P-1 Drainage 8 Channel, and 9 WHEREAS, the City of Renton passed Resolution No. 1443 in connection 10 with the Green River Eastside Watershed Project of which the City of Renton 11 is one of the original sponsoring organizations, and 12 WHEREAS, the City of Renton Resolution authorized King County, as its 13 representative, to act as a contracting agent with other governmental agencies for the earlier pump station phase of the Eastside Watershed 15 Project, including the Soil Conservation Service of the United States, and 16 WHEREAS, said pump station phase of this project has been completed 17 under contracts issued by King County acting in its own behalf and as the 18 authorized representative of the City of Renton, and 19 WHEREAS, the City of Renton remains the sole local sponsoring 20 organization for construction of the P-1 Drainage Channel portions of the I 21 Eastside Watershed Project, and 22 WHEREAS, the City of Renton has passed a Resolution in connection with 23 the Green River Eastside Watershed Project to act as a contracting agency 24 for the P-1 Drainage Channel, Phase 1 and 2, and 25 WHEREAS, the City of Renton has requested that certain King County easements and rights of way in, connection with said P-1 Drainage Channel 0 portions of the Eastside Watershed Project be in the name of the 28 contracting agency, namely the City of Renton; 29 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT MOVED y the Council of King County: 30 A. King County hereby subrry,-- tes in favor of the City of Renter., irl 31 I connection with the heretofore describer] project, all of its easements and 32 rights thereunder for right of way for the P-1 Drainage Channel, Phase 1 33 and 2, and more particularly described as follows: -1- 7028 1 Parcel 1 - That portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 24 'VOwp 9 23 North, * Range 4 East, W.M., in Kin Cou ,Washington, more particularly described as follows: nty, 3 Commencing at the North 1/4 corner of said Sec. 24, being 4 identified by Washington State Lambert Grid Coordinates (North Zone) N.176.063.50 and E.1,652,845.10; thence 5 S.00°55'30" W., along the North-South centerline of said Sec. 24, 159.12 ft. to a point on the Sly line of a tract 6 of land recorded under Auditor's File No. 7301180480; thence 5.89°04130" E. along said Sly line 439.00 ft; 7 thence S.00°55'30" W. 300.00 ft. to a point on the Nly margin of a parcel of land owned by the Municipality of e Metropolitan Seattle (METRO), which is the true point of beginning, also being a point on a curve, the center of 9 said curve being 5.00°55'30" W. 9.15 ft. ; SEly along said curve 12.67 ft. ; thence S.11°34'46thence h E ce 1.39 ft. ; thence N.78025'14" E. 311.39 10 E. 783.48 ft. , to a 10.00 ft. ; thence S-11034'46" ft. ; thence N.11°34'461nW. 11749.46efte ola°Poin0t of•curve, 11 the center of said curve being S.78025114" W. 307.00 ft. ; 12 thence NWly along said curve 329.53 ft. ; thence N.73004'46" W. 89.03 ft. to a point on the Nly margin of 13 land owned by the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle; thence S.89°04'30" E. 238.60 ft. along said North margin � 4 to the point of beginning. 15 Parcel 2 - That portion of said Sec. 24, described as fol _-j 16 Commencing at the above mentioned Point S.18°39'08" E. ��A"' thence 1? 318.94 ft. to the true point of beginning; thence N.78°25114" E. 30.74 ft. to the Wly margin of a 18 parcel of land owned by Burlington Northern, Inc. ; thence S.11034'46" E. 29.75 ft. ; thence S.12048136" E. 64.02 ft. to the Sly margin of land owned b 19 Metropolitan Seattle (METRO) ; y the Municipality of MET said Sly ( ) ; thence 5.77 25 43 W. , along Z0 y margin 20.43 ft. ; thence N.18039108" W. 94.83 ft. �I to the true point of beginning. 21 Parcel 3 - Lots 11 through 19, inclusive, in Block 35 of 22 C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition Division No. 1, as recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, records of �3 King County, Washington. 24 B. This grant and subrogation in favor of the City of Renton is made �5 for the purpose of authorizing said city to act as contracting party with the federal agency which is funding all or a portion of said Green River 27 Eastside Watershed Project. 28 PASSED this ? 1-t,_ day of Q�,Q�� 29 190 . 30 ;(ING CO" NTY POUNCTL 31 KIN OUNTy, W NGTON 32 Chair _ 33 ATTEST: - Clerx of tAou�ncil� -2- i z1t5' Q 0 I N /1�, 3Z/. Do Grndy I � `` r• 0 Way F3o� r f A-1 173� 772, 700 ((( 4 A! 173,_544, • o I X z i Scale 1•'=40, y a� Vi X/ i73, 6,55, 1s4.4 — %� -155 E !� GSA, o00 2 /�3r SS3. 46 7-9 i 73, 5s3.3 0 X � � G3�, O�l�•2µSL 9 6 /DO DS41 !po AAA I } ! IT N 73, 38/. 4t&7/ h2 I X + 15 /. Lsy '� - - x 3 DI:iT1=161.427? 23.4531E - - 2S ` E3=1,654.044.235 I ll/ /73 259. 0744 I l05 44, Zog, LOCAT-low =-1+0s BOX H yJ rau SEE SEPARATE HYDRAULICS SECTION S"jy8ic... f7'r- • • CHANNEL STABILITY Four separate soils reports have been developed for the project area due to a number of structural measures in the vicinity such as the Grady Way box culvert , the SR405 box culvert , Oaksdale Ave and SW 16th St . bridge . Soils reports by Hong Consulting Engineers , Geo Engineers , CH2M Hill and the SCS generally agree on the soil profile in the vicinity of the P-1 connecting channel . These reports indicate an SP/SM layer at channel bottom elevation overlain by an SM layer at some elevation between 5 and 10 feet . As-built channel conditions WSP2 computer runs indicate an as-built velocity of 3 . 4 fps at station 677+55 which is just downstream, of the channel confluence , 3 . 2 fps at station 672+75 which is just upstream of the channel split area and a velocity of 2 . 5 fps at station 673+75 just downstream of the split . Tractive stress analysis was used to aid in determining channel stability under as-built conditions which gives an allowable tractive stress of 0 . 031 psf . Channel bottom tractive stress at station 673+75 ( 2 . 5 fps ) was calculated at 0 . 022 psf which is less than allowable . Channel bottom tractive stress at station 677+55 ( 3 . 4 fps ) was calculated at 0 . 042 psf which is greater than allowable . Approximately 50% of the 60 foot bottom width channel will be compromised of rock riprap due to the 12 foot bottom, 3 : 1 •, side slope trapezoidal low flow channel . Also , most of the channel slope will be compromised of gabion basket walls . The remaining channel bottom and disturbed side slopes will be covered with an erosion control blanket similar to that used successfully on the Pond to Grady Way section of the P-1 channel just downstream of this section. The erosion control blanket in conjunction with the rapid rate of grass growth in Western Washington and prompt seeding after disturbance will provide protection from as-built condition channel erosion. Aged channel conditions WSP2 predicts a maximum aged channel velocity of 4 . 9 fps immedietly upstream of the Grady Way box culvert ( station 678+15 ) . A maximum permissible velocity of 5 fps was established by Washington State Design Engineer , Keith Busch during the original East Side Green River , P-1 channel design hydraulics in 1983 and is assumed to still be valid for this reach of channel . COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev. 8-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE PROJECT �SLa/Z. GUV1�3E'Gf!/1' GGJ�JrJrtc� BY DAT CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT 1 1 • -- CGlQrldre� �lzt�l�!/�/ SHEET OF z 4 -fua/ anel Sri � GL o�v �Ie �ra�ti / �fr�4g ! 61 7' �21a4,e5 a`DN9 noe/ anS G'%fi��rer�f Ve�dGef�es J`calc�io� �aCGftd� s/ress ���d a5 dut/�n�' !.� Trzzs ioylz QsT �Iv Q= /Zg� cfs pis $o *ow SP �o� ( I{ohlC7 �C�T�TNt*l 35r>7� Et_FEE V. +3' maximao-i rklc h-uc on fr,1P Ghame/ Ae bo lfo� v f Cha tihe I .'. h'�5u.�re tr�p Char�ne/ �or cc Ha/ys�;s 5ed�rv►.en�' Load- �I.e�.r . Z'Z7 �rD 5e' , eoo3g Z L - (Z,/ z)z. �5f COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev. 8--69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE V/119 PROJECT BY l > DAT47 CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. � l5/93 • SUBJECT Gha4n4l s{z 5z /'1Y SHEET Z OF z Tizzy a l/ .o3/af r2y ✓= Z.5{Ps Sri 5e I. SS X �O$ z, 5 (3z.z. z�, o«azZ)''z y v _ 0ZZPs� 0, 03 � �sf bl� i COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE �1 SCS-ENG-523 Rev. "9 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE PROJECT BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT // l` 30�� �L P Q�f flef SHEET / OF T" rGtaW'i;vl veal( 30"o izGQ 1 Pip2. in�uL e.l¢v. �f,Z' 4 �l Ght+nOZi bDA W1 t/er Z j �7trrL'tt OtJ 005 VJ 6 L.F 64�rk�u// = e%v Z 7 1��te.^•,�ena: �1�� moo/ d�.�,e r����,� and ps 0 t a�l a_t5lP .D2 gr�n rote �o. Q ia.9 �ga5)'/Z- (32•7_(Z.S)5�t/Z '+Q Z. Vo ' -tT D -Tr C Z 5)z 3. V h = vo Got,5 sm-' 5) 51,1 005 \/h s I. v� = [Cva s )� 7-1 (Ef, + D/Z C05 6s1,7-15 ) )] (P,f. q / 1 c, + 2 S/L ens (s t�'� ,or�5��� \/V = 13.3 fPs COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS—ENG-523 Rov. "9 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE PROJECT 5 BY DATE i� CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT /I SHEET Z OF T 181 tG,n �P = N,Z+ v�Z� 13 •`4 gyp, J 1- 81 Xp 4 �P 5 P 15. Lf FA Z .lol COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev. 8-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE n PROJECT ESL7�' y—/ BY lip Yt DAT CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT SHEET 3 OF _o.tv CFd-Z) (o. �.c, CZ.toI-Z) , 5 f + ZS yi Q x1n &n d 75 S-75 rnl _ 1. 7 ft, 10. Floole- fool c lmco6,i ovl de.�fi>1 @ ee,rt der o. 8 �m �l/��'�'t �e imPerv�o�g Rlembran� G��- etev, - 3.r� e lei/ L ou ld its �S /PSr 74�lail 71-he Z .4f o f -�a Md �dj li f 4/so slZe 76 reed COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev. 8-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE )q PROJECT BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT /I .30 GP co -E-r SHEET_ OF T Lla. FA _ ),,Z F� = Z-t5 &n 7SCZS� � i - e I 1 -,15 C•t5q) • Std 1s bs '/ �bOl - z � , s ft. wAu a 'l�.�r►�l Sr�T�orJ . UJA FE S T 5/0 e- G2EEN /2/ UE-2 !� E 3 9lz/F� � /0/�-/y,c 572UCTue/' L- GCADY tP4,( (3OX CUCvcr2T('Gw6c) LUjN6-V14LL I l9 z. GWEN ; A. As s V m e C ross Se c.--iov\ a-k- max i mu v , Wall H e- � h fi MaJv)lreno-,nce- or Const-ruc.-?,-co , CAP. UIprne-7t l0 of Wall . � of ena•x t µ,�'T�_"� � L�b� C3crm �O► i, 1 � w P, ,U �ror � IU z = v E Xc a vo- -io vt �Z p N4 = tfC6z.4� 1 - i C P5s (3-tf.) Z.-4) »� G U3 i r'� o�A►N W I n FILL 3 u RLi LL7'� C4,t 5 C.oMP TED I I �I F w3 �, e-,+y df 1 Gw c=ouN OA710 l wbfi w N P FOUhlDF}7/ON • L B. MATC2IAL PV-cPE27'JES (7eoEn�ineer5� I. 5P $ACKFILL: �mi = loo�cf� =30� :y,C. Gwp,C- — Cr-es�lo� Z. GLJ DQAINF/LL : Jynfz = llopc-F j � 3So 3. GW FOUNDATION: 1'im3 =JZoPcf� ys,+3= 13op,-F,' Y-1 LB/oct` 40,0 . T, 3-1 2ciz��„J�j 4 SP FOUNDATIaq e Me-j "un, Sgr,d w16-riavf1 j N=ls Wal 16,U A-de = 3 SPcf 3 Ys-.t4 = 127Pcf SCS-cw& -353 5'. CONC2ETC : �c� ��oPcf �c�= 4,000 ps E,=S,7-:r�V71-7 � =(PO,O'ooPs; 31 E�s =24,ecc,000 ,) 6'c =3,�oS,000 ,' (.tJJ� �AsT s/oE G2�� 2�v�2 KER 9/z,/ SC, STQVCTuQ,AL - G-raJ j WAy CA 1 Z 14 C. REFE2ENCE5 �• � E1-� -� STRvcTvQAL. IJESIG/V Z. Te-(-7 ee.inforc,eJ Co "r- y-e+'e STrevo -k Desr�h � . ENGLNCE'21NG' 0C-5)GN STANDA,2OS -- F6oS 4. GEoENG-INEEe,S :TNC. * Geo1oyy e�Port -GWbC 5'. Re Y)IY,\3 W X 1)esr8r) Gu )-cl-e - LJ5FS �. FEND : Des )fin a S- G,b Cqn V`cr IU vwal� A. �.xTe(z/VAL 57,gC31I-lTY - 5 LI D) There ogre +wo robgble {•uiluwc PI ones +o be G he.c►ce.j - -o r 5 ► i d v��. 1) 51 �d 1nj qlo r%� +-k1c base • a f t-ke cohC-r--fc Foo-( ikA Z) sl Id 0� ck1o"t +�L.e C t b u.S,P o f h 2 (r ltl Pu5 s i v e res i sf-a,n c�-_ Pre ssu J--e vtJ i 1 Io.0 Vl e$ I G cf 4, /. Pw-ss,,ite res IS-t-ghce_ P r�cssu rr c.u/'A/ be ccsec( for Cone r'4-rb pi wZ) b Lct w "{ 1 b,e �r'm"f-c/ �o glvr Iy d-er t✓�s � reaf- r t-ka rt d r ed / fo 3 See S K.e+-c,k 1 v, Z A. -r� r- I a y c u+ c t^ Ve r+eb- 1-1orizoh fq( 'o r'CeS 0. S sumecl -�or Cor� ifroh #/ Foi lure Co rw� J-Son I LAT�2A3(- E�92TH P,QCSSU,e� ( As Skawv� a n 5kee.t #/� CL, C1Aec)c w a l l st),�,-rneS S -�-w/N c O-oF5 =� L�iu►"-tX = 0.03S'(131) Z'Vfr) = 1-3.-3 �i f 3 / wq 1 I tk S ►'s max. �,-o r r�sS� re a SS cc k-)-v A-ro►-t , U5 e Z�w = / Z b, Loy-�cra`I �ar-i-l-� }�res Sc,t ,(� Co c��rc ►���5' �e 3, F�. 2.�� 1• SP C3acK�;1I : = 30 °� = 5� k�a/ =D. 3 � GW Drain-ril ( : �= 3s°� =s; Ka = 0. 3i 5u+^C""►-7.e 3. GW Fouv-JoL4-vo =40' z =S 2.4 �1o�e 4. SP FduodCZL7•0,'7 : �= 30�� �z5 J Kay = o. 3Sfj }{Q =3•0 W/� SAS]� 5 1 D � G2EEN ,QI vE2 leE13 91z/ S� S7QUCTU2/!}'L - GW(3C W�tNGwALL- 3 19 C. To+o t Try L-r =z t = IZ "� LH = ((14,tN2) �►+,, -/U,-I►,+Z) I��,, + �a + �,t z ((81:5-t7')(loopc) -o-oyO.38) t t-a = 3Z7,P 2. l< Z) Mo 2 t M, t u Z +-ato = ZG7Rrf 3. dN3 Ymt - AJs) Kaz.+P3= ZOspsf =((I-4.+Pz) Y,,,, + H-SY".,Z—/1�iur"Nj) )C43 +I,J,+P,tM3 = ((8/s-t7')(too) tG(llo> -o-o-O��p.Zy) f-o +oi-V = 3 G5 ps-F t f Kai t,u� = Cl.oB)C��sP�f�'o.z�)+ I.oxC6z•�) • I = 8 5'Psf J. Ve r-F I'CA I Fo rc e s I. WA, , Cl3'XI '��Isapcf� = 19So Ibs 2. w-F = ( II'CI. Sopcf� = 17 $Z 16S 3. W, _ Pcf) _ (040 Ibs 4. tt1Z= C? 'x8 ')Cioo�cf) = S 4,co lbs P��)= s^c6s U= CI-Tt�w+�'H�Ct�)CfoZ SAP ) ( I I ')(I.03 )C6z.y)= 74/ /b.s <3. 2, :5- Uj u = 1s,2S'Z - 751/= 14, srr )bs e, Noe1Z.oNrA4-. FORCES CW if-ln 1,Pl �rf) -c- I F� = Z. (Nr r 11z)0 � = Z(g.G)(3z?) = 140 l bs Co-nc,re+-c e W% Z. }7Z ; 43 6—H z = 1(0o Z- l bS Ca«r-s e ✓or-Ic 3. P3 = Z WZ d►+3 I S 1 bs 1'S �bocA1- +-1►e 4. Pj 9(365) = 394 16s Same as 014 5, Ps= Y?-t f6-1-4, kZ (I•o8')(�s) . C.ovtc•e-to 6r1 G. s:'P= 4,O&316s S: l+y 60,,xl 7. Pr Sw tam Z6° = 7077 /6s 260 WA CAST 5 ) 0G G2eG 21 VC,2 ICEa 9 /z/R. S72UCTU[?A L- — GW(3C. W INC-WA LL- 4 14 -F. SLIDING : £ Fx = c -P-tr Fs.s = FF /S P = 7077/4063 = 1. 74 > 2. Fal � LA Yc Ccn J ,'4-oh ' z •Tkis C.oVicAi +ion c o m p ae�-ec. G W F O U N D�}T10/1 a•�J Co h e►� e Sf-Y'uc.'I-kV'e Wi f f /51 jJE . •T1JQ pre SSu ire S CL foo�e. + �e o P O +-IA e tY o 4-1'yi q t v i l � be e�e m- ems! 5aYrie aS Cen {-tdr ' �dCxc•ePt T k e 4 c 4-d" P ,ems s u y+e.s b ee f c-W i--L,.e 4-v P o �o4-;►� w 1 b`e �'ro nA 4--h e q-�u,r�-u 5 P �urtc��.-��a►-� So ► � S. The r�slst-tn� j�gss�` ve Press u,re 1`S cz.ssu k"ir-cl fo d e �e IaP fro r�, +-lie Sci ra� ec� S FUuKc� F ,� n so �'/S eUevj j-kc� • +ke-,-e w %l1 be z ' of rr,p ✓CL/O cL r-%/�-cr ct -i o S P 4o ArcJ ex4-44 n So ;1. wI N,=l I +�2 i a I� I P I -a- • I I 6K K4 =o 3l �W3 I i I4 Z i�K I wbfi c �WbYz -��L F / ' d'µ 4 � a -�,r2 �=4,3$ '�U • WA EA ST S I D E G 2cEW 0 VE2 K2r3 9 /z/ F� — STP.uCTU2AL- - GUJOC WiNGwALL- Ct. To -0. 1 Hori zoh+0. l PressLk re I. ( -H _ .9)(100)(0.3S) Z. O-H? 5x1o0)(0.31) = Z7 s 4• ��� = �(R.9 (Ida) + 4010)x0.38) = 589105-F 5: CH � 3 C�s)Co.38� +- 3 C�z,4-� = Zcr- ► p Sf b. ve r h ca.l Forces 1. Uivi = 1950 16S 2. Ujr = 17 $ Z 16S 3. \4j1 = Cio)C /Z = 950 16S 4. Wz = 7000 l 6s w !o _ � 11, 3 6, wb�r1 = -7(3)030) = 2730 Lbs 7. wbfz = IICz)030)= 286O lbs B. Wbf3 = 3CZ)(130� _78o IbS = . ;i4,652- 1 b.s 10. U = — 1 6s 1 (. R= 20)?08 I b5 C. Farces OL kvu�� 0 P3= k2-�()(zo5) = CIS Ibs Pt = 3 C509) = 1767 16s P5 = !z C3)Cz = 3 9 z 16s �_; P►, - = 5,9 3 4 1 2 fah( — 20,90 s a S 8. PP = %Z(3')t3(4.5)C3) + 3 1 ► 5'8 Ibs Sq ,F S s = Fp. +-PP R, = (10,t9 9+ f I S-'?)1573 4 0 < • wR RAT sioc- G2eL=N )Z K—' STRL)c 7U(?-A L - (rw 13C. WING-W A.LL- 6 ( 9 Q. EX Tt✓R/LEA L S7i9(3 ( LIT`� �G3EA21rlG- �2ESSv2e=� C k ecic {-o r Qe�a,rr P r�s u►-� a t t'h e Sa.,, e 4, s l• ��1�� Co�d:-�an l - w UPI rf-r- �f /'s assumed f'ha-t tl e Confac,t p rrss u r- c� iai7rv-w w0,Il be ccS sl�awH 6e /aw: wSZ � i ? r • C � 0 A 7 r wlS Wsr P2 nn Lof T3 0 li 2•Sfww V. 7l`lltpTl Vcri^;cal C-vrce �� d-� •3�' IHd�c�d c ass Mcr►�eht s r "-''t U �-B Ihduced S�rss sa►, ens , 3 CSp - -fFv/L e F mcme4{-s u bo-u F o W Y i IQ."C 0-3 ya. = �Mc� /!� �`Cz.s w +s�swF d- 7(Wsz f-wS3)4 g.3(WS,) P2 - 3.o 8 P3 —- S--q - •3��- -S,S"U��1�f�s7/ 7 S l,U►44)r'� v�7���/e �3 :. U IL 3 G 1 -'' 7.3 3) • cvA EAST S /,OE' 62EEIV R VE2 9/z/s� STRUGTUPIAL GW (3c. WING-W.c L-L 7 /9 The Y'eS �` �-an�' S1-t'eSs c� ;Sf-�; bc,�-l-�o►-� �' S f'tien _ 1319-51$ Q-T= LA rd-b 80 P s f = 1315+Sl Y = 18 37Ps� ,AIIowgble C3�,ri�� Pressuv�e : F5 =3 #3 B = 1 ► ,3 Na = 1 � � a� = NeCjk+ o� Lo-,.+er L4, to1e Qbave bwSe = I.O8 i 1-4 _ 7-L-l5445 �/� N = 7•5 +6.5 NQ = 7.5'-f0.5�1�� = �S. S USc /S � =33` J 7-L-IS4g57 3/5' gai = l ( T5� Sg2 = o.z2s DE = o.zzs 0 = 3. TsF� t-KzY4L = o.F(.I .I) + 0.99(3.6) = 4. 1 TS F orB`` = 4 , 1T5F (Z000 ZOOPs� CONCLUSIoN e Si ►ice +ke Max ;r.,uw. be.grrin.9 Pressure CL337ps4--) J`S /css e //owQble D£'Ari✓�� �reSSUre �$ZOO�S�� �-�e 5f-r'uc,+-c..�e 1`5 J'}�-�O le �O 1" b Pam.ri►�y `J r'cS S c.� rP � r ra i � -�,re Co vicl 1'+J'o Yl l we- -I j uP !,'fit' p r e s s u r-e co k?s cl e rm W�4 EA5T 510 i G2EEN P-I vE(P- 1�ci3 9/z/ $ 6 STeUCTu2A-L Gt,,)Gc UJINGWALL 8 /9 Z. Fa► 1�..i re G o r.� �-}--t d n � I c,v�-f-l�� u,t' c...�P 1 ��i- 6A = Rl[ = 15, 25Z 13 37 osF yp- = �Mo%e r[.s( ►9so) + S'.s(178z)+ ,(scovtszgo� + - 1.9 J'(/4o(.) - 10. 5-4(394) - 0 (4(- 1 /ls,zSZ = 4.8Z �r 6i = 1387 +s15 = I QoZ p-s F d'� = 138? - s l5 = 87Z ps SihCe CT L gZOO S� f �e.� spa bye . 1' �. Failure Card .+J,(z , 02 w,'4-41 from 0,-4 _ (Z/ L = 20, 9o8/a 0 = 1045 ps f W ! rVDmpy `J• y(Z = -EM. /1` _ CZ.,S(155O) +- 5,5C178Z) + 9.(c.,? N!570) + S(7000+6(voo) — 3,57(.2 730) t 5.S C28Gd) + 12(780) lo•0 (I50q)- - 4.03C1 - 3.o q-a (17G7) -�- 0.9 Z(39 2> 3 (3,7 4 4.�j 12 0)9 0 8 = S. 4.7 -Ft 6.67 Wk.l l w �-4-V,i h M d d le %3 o 6-Lo f-o u mJ c --la n(-o.3 3 �-o 7•c, 9 - e = 1 o. O - S� �(zp�Z 6b.b7 d _ Qe�S = 2D,908(-�•4�)���.c�7 - - 775ps Ig2o 270Ps F ►8zo psf • WA L-"A57 sio� G2EEN R� vE2 K E a 5TR.VG-'UeAL -GWf3C WiNC�W/�LI_ 9 � 9 4 . E-ai1urr Conti 4-lo►7 w fAa LA.t L4P ) Tf is obvious + kqt Wi II b-c nc, P r`o tole,-►-) w t�� f✓G,i'S Go h d.'f-f'a� u�o rr c�7d h o f 7-4.e o f-A Q r- caYrcl, C a I C,.,(,I ,-f-•e C( . CDNCL�S/oN e The Sf-✓uc4-u. re /� we11 L,(j r 1- i ✓t ck Fac,A ►- o to Sq,ice +L e rrLc 90 re co f S /-/le mac/ c C. CX7E-ZZ AL STAS3 CITY — OVER.TU2N(N G- • Tke- o �i ( w ovevrurhivt Gacr? aCcc p- f 5 ro/�a 4-i cL b o u 1- -f-o e o-{ f--A e 4o ozl-vl. a i- e la a S e • Ufa I t o i'l l c&ki4 ,to of i-o o \.e r +-uvh i'vi; The ,rces cle�-er r, �'rtegl �o r Fa i' l�.i r'e (fCa,-c.c.l f-i a ✓7 u"O/i w r I ( be u l-e-d - �Se P S Li e�tS 3 6�• . Res es-k- na Momevlf-S M Q = 2. S (1500) ++ 5'.5" <c7Sz) + 7(5-400t5'027o) + 6"40) = 9�� 14-8 /6s MO =. q.9S(14o�) + 4,0$�16oZ) + 3.08�6�s� + p. S4(394 O + S.S(-741) lv'6 = 2 G)7 Z 5 41-4l .S • 3_ Fq c.4-o r o f S�,Fci--7,e FSo FSo Mrz= Mo = 9� l4� G ' . 60 • � � /L � Z 5 = 3 7 >1.5• . Ol WA GAST SIDE G2ER-N eIVE1? C3 G/2/ ?-(" ST2UCTUQ4L- G W (3C• W INGWALL lO 19 D. EXTC-fZNAL S7A3) L1 ETTLE MENT 7-L- /51 9 Zi'S Q= I I '� �1 = S P= /.3 Pa = 0-5-Cl ) = 0. GSTS F oO)o.sf Sett bev► ,eo t. More i-l�a�n Iof Setflerleht Gavi be eApec.fec I +tie �-ouv,dec! oh 4-Aie VI -tferal So ( Bowe\1erJ f�ke wall -ffouv(ded orl 0. GoarSe CW �'ouvtdCt. ion 11 t'�N re e -P�Ie t _,; (A g? e s 14-e d b{y 2e-�. ''4 QY\C w(1iG� ! S t�eec� 2c� f-o CQ ► Cl vl Pl�lG1IvL �auVLd�,{- o� T5F 1<� z O. 5 s = Ki a = ,?,y�a, s--) - 1.2TsF o-►- 24(DO F s� Since �S =ZS/-oops > P��x - /g02Psf and the . Suv'ckar e of 19 %5 > g + ken Dii-Ferenfja.I Seff jevrrer?- -- w i l I be )esS �. SLOPE STA [3) LIT`c -- 1%,1AS5 MaU T- SING! the will ►io-F be excava�- ► n� tt-, e Gkanvle,l any 4eeper t 11a►-1 was doh P or -+ )A e b o x C c,l,I ve r t o r m u c 1-7 do r 7 4a C k a v,v►e ( a kj c/ the 511, , e.s Lrc nocU +sa (o a c. lc 0k, /ooL4+ , I s (de.e /S /,ff-/e /rice Good e XCcn w ; I I C mez s s rn�vevy, �- r'r) s I-ot b � r' I Y c o n d -ce s Gas Q'IJ cG,aKnel bclb'O " f u-"-,Ci ►'c C-IL r P t c w �!� r�G�eve n1ost hy�n,sr4z�i'c w lvroes 4rc;"-1 +h e W a }- r Ta b Iv! a r rcLto r CI cl m uu d-o-t cyst C o n d r'4--ro ns f--h e P Ck'ne Z-- �tJ A EAST SIDE- G 2Ej=-N 21 VE2 ST2vc�-v2�� - Gwf3C. wiNGw/�L� 1 / Iq CONCL () S10r4 - CATERNgL 57Ar3 ( L �T`� The Wo,H wl+h rJ irrien, ) fcns Selec.+c-J t.c ' Il be ex +-crngHl stable . The sele�Icd 8 mevisi'ons Crecy+e +he worst loa(�i'rj9 CohdI'�-r'ohS on +A -e WOW. `r' tle wct // le I t, -f-- w (1 / t, q Ir X J 3 ' +-a I '. T k c e_ 41 11 a I so be 5o i I bcacir-4, 11 a o cl rock r ipp -Ap Pt4cecf o n f-�te Sf r^,caP-, 5 r`c/e of (,(j a 1 f as c ct q l/ t'Gt-e \_ T k e s e a c4 ci t,4-,'o vices I c o yr s ,-c1 e r -q 4-7-o ci s w vlc rec s e i-l-ce (-ac,+o rs o F Sa�e-�y hey ohc/ t� 0 S�e Ca ( Gu (afcCI. F. I TEPX)C. 57ABILIT"C 1, - vi e. w ca ► I l o ad �,�� w � I I b-e +-k e S a. vrr e ct S 5 (moo w v\ o VI �� e ( a.�d {0.-ces I--tt e IF cj & eo Street 3 . Z, De.},ernn i vie Mod,k o C!4S �-,'c r'�y a f ccjHcv-e.�`C r 31 �OO�QOp PS i O r in' 14 xro$ PSIr- 3, De-{ ermihe Mo►-►,e,�ts� 5 �ear� a"J cLa Net C ors ac.'� i�9 ova i--he wall . THeSP were CAI r-q, cltrcf to iv, p ro r-Q. i n t ke 14 PA I CX 5 f rt4 c.f-u rm I a PAq y s I'S �r,c WA EAST SIDE GRF—F—N RIVEZ S i 2vcTU2�4L GW(3c WING-WALL /2 /q �[-N PO T D4TA a vT PU T i) TA SEC,tanl DATA - X=t�,0ft L=13.OR MX=c,,,a0 9 R►! X=1.00 y@= • d 0,,N NX=-35.03 = it �t Rir 'f. ci M.=-17".6" We=-2 fi0. E t-RIr v=7.9@ 4_ dry � �MX1=4.00 •r-. t Tt ti'! • ... ') ilk=-`J',']3,55 "4 MU"ACNT PLOT 04t Y.I wuE! X=7.09 Li u wx �RE'=1,i1 to j!`4, �.�Z- 1•�' MX=-or'1f�.:'a luiNHt A"II_. 14 r.tC . t9.9 x M,Y=-14,59Y.14 CENTROIt; AUS At V A �1 • ` _ F'RIN'iF'0p;^;Ic �f� �4X• Mov►vonf }7.9 ►IS tr ft+ D cG, • wA EAST 5/DE' G2EEl�/ 2i vE2 S'IQUGi o(2P�I.-. - GLdec- W ► NG-W/3LL- I3 I9 514EA2. (Li35) 54EAZ PLOT DGFLE(--:TI0NS DEFLac.Tcoi\4 PLOT PLOT OF BEE r - 1b5 ; <UN IT�= 1.; Y <UHITS= E 3.` a Y <UHITl= E-2.i X=1,AA8E0 -3.58 -1.53 8.0^ X=1.888E8 A [�tj V=-49.80E0 . i------------------! i------------------I X=2.880E8 9.0 = X=2.898E0 0.0 = V=-193.0E0 2.8 �•8 = X=3.888E8 3.0 X=:s.808 y E' V=-354.8E8 4.0 Y=-18.79E-3 4•�' 5.8 J. = X=4.800E8 6.8 V--54.0;.0E0 7'0 = Y=-9.291E-1 7.0 = X=5.008E0 9.0 X=5.P-,88E0 18,0 Y=-7.°1°E-3 10.0 11.0 8 X=6 X=6.080E8 i2. .888E8 12.8 V=-t.H '•s 13.8 = Y=-6.301E--3 13.8 � �`Pr ' X=7.800E8 - IOOE X4.800E8 .;. IEO V=-1.642E3 Y=-3.708E-3 X=9.000E0 X=9.a00E0 X=18.88E0 X=19.88E8 V=-2.71?E? I Y=-1.`24E-3 X=11.00E0 V=-10 F09E? Y=-723.3E-n X=12.00R X=12.00E8 V=-3.128E3 Y=-193.4E-6 V-17 00co _ - . Min. Sheer = 3, 5 7S 16s Man. Defl -G. 01s 4t- i =-O. l S i fiches 0 Y- 3.ra ICiPS NOTL : These c(e-F/ec-�Tans 0.r'e -For q C o nc_ref e b e-mr" W i•i--k d-L+ S tee.I . T-hA--X Q►^e rq--p V'ese"4-- H've of +-kie mV vim' 1ude o f il-Ae �eFlec-/-rbvrS. pef(ecf►o�s W; • l.V /} EAST EIVEe wA 9V2/ F6. STZUC_TUP-AL C UJ 3CC 19 I 4. 17 e�e r m ;n e �e i v� �c� rc i v►9 Steel area fez C4 V= IBD-l-I��C Mn = l 8Mu /o.9 = Z.OMu Vh = I.$ VL�10"36= r?• / Vu U = ►.8c 44 Mn Vn [3qr Sire a ticJ T2'{o7 •r-O 4-Ki S Pac i n Sc(cc.+r-J 4 =0.9 35.7 75 1.S3 O•IS O•Z�{ 0.43 6 � �'� CAs= I.33) 29.0 (o-(� I .Oq Z 23.2 5.7 O.S5 c� = 1z" 3.Y-8..5ri 3 1B.z 4.9 0.66 4 13.9 4. 1 0•51 �5 < A�stiy S 10.3 3.4 0. 37 -7. 3 2.9 o. 2._.�, � erC '�CAs=o.33) AS t-re m 7 g-.9 2. Z o. 17 �S-ZZo 3/s S 3. 1 1- 0- It 9 l • 8 I - • la O. 9 0.,7 0•r 5 Il 0.3 0.4 12 0. 1 i0. 2. 1 a. 1v- 13 0. 0 o • a' 6.is Un•��. L.cpasa( Llnerp. -1ne�`P• J-Qce pri nc��a 1 a nc1 Facc l=0.ce Fticc i�or�z• , Tem�er'afu►^-e Vert'• Tc.+.p� I-EoriZ. LIvi cc Pri►+,-;44 Tr,"p, vcrr,talT. �acc CVe-r 4-icc. l S 14 EA-PL S T 2E"N G-T I4 CIF CO NC R E T E �/c = Z Fes` bw A 1:iWo (IZ)(9,5) = 1•q,4 Zo I S S iv)ce i-ke r 5f-r'e t-'h ProUi'cle-,/ by f--A Concv�•f� �'S � rCa-{-••ter �'�ar� -f-l� e SLi •ear 5 f rr✓n� f r c4/✓ecl -f' e�t r1 o S /7 r 1S Y!•e ed ecl. (VOTE : AS scicc.4-cd 4f- ct I ( Ac i,� At-S r'S 1csS +�ta �s i WA• �A-ST SIDE 2iuE2 .5 T Quc.ru�eA L — G w t3 c. w G w�.L I S 19 �: Determine +ke. bar sizcs tihd sPgc i$n t-�E Ur�exPose� �ace �Pri'hc��al strel�— Ver`fr� ( Sct )5 `�� OIZcPr�sents bars selecfrd. TQ-�7 ES-2Z� �j I .Qb �Gn'd e loop /31� Use class B s�iZc,S � I • _ _ _ -��-� (3ar- Cu+off lint (ZQb 0 •� f•O I"fihirr,urn As (�e� a�'r c4 n i nZ (. C. )ec K crack C-o n+ro l ; Si►�Ce S C Sr -A- Crack Con �r-bI Cr,'ferla iS Vhet. 7 C �ecIC c�ef �cC. '{-�on Gon � ro � Cri } erI'c� 1I l3Ciz) YmaX 0. 7 s�`Kce YHtaxa ) yr►t.►.c the., c9- 8. �e�erm,he Te�nP�rafGi Sf-ee/ i'h tie Un CAP oset/ -(;q c-e 4. As= o.21 l'mZ j Use 'Y e /Z" A=o.3I WA EAST s�o� G2�EN 21v�2 57P2Vc7UZ4 _— Gw (3 1NGWALL. IG 19 9. Determine Tev"perai-tire Steel ih +ke eApased face Q=o.00-3 Gl. 4 o r i z o►,A-a I - As = 0.4-3 i r)Z: 1JS e #6�'�Z '� A =o.4 .1,ni e= o.00Z b. ve, -ic,, I -- As = O. Z9j,, Z ; Lis 4S(g/Z ", A=0.33,'tiz G. IN7ERNAL STA131LIT`< - FEEL of FoaTING 1. Deferrnine +-ke loacl.,vig oh e heel . -The u Jo rs t Co Nd i-ro n + r Ci e4 r rH� r�.0 u ✓� woq s rq I u ire co v,.d. �`�--�o L '*L / L +-heee 4:�) re Ltse �-ke con+CLc+ p r^e-ssuv.rs Or-7 pages 8. Noweved'� cl,ecic thece,,d11-io✓i W�I•h UpII'Fr-. Ose;l b= g�-144oP� M - +v4 I - Dr.+t1 -- Ibo2Psf $72�s 87Z Psf =Cz (19oZ-87Zj=74?pf J'Ij Toil = I(oZ Ipsf �. Dcie-rm i oe +he 4Pac.4-,3+'ed I o Qc(S : W I'Mou'{' DeC4 load redLkces +ke e w-ev 0� +-he Cornba,P ec4 100-CL I• N ex+ 4-n S�,fpa r t wu = 0.9(-Ir,,oZ) +- 147(ps 2. of Eod : W4 = o.9(-16oz) +- 1.�(v-72 pS� b. Wy = 18 Wd + 1.$LAJC _ W3(told i-WG) 2. A+ Cr)d:. Wu= 1.2;(-Ic:;ozf-772)� - � 314 psF w,q �/45T Sioc G2EEh! )eIVE2 kLt3 5/Z/86 STRUC-fUQAL GWBC- WINGWALL / 7 / 9 3, 17e.+e.rm i vle i-ke Cnc 6 eed Loads cv r ALA u10 1-'AL Wk =a.9 W'd P;. 1. At- Support ; W L,-to.9(166z) + 1.8C15S4) 13 55 p s �(►837-gc, 7S3 8bi073 = 1554. 2• At Encj : Wu = 0.y(-14101� + 1-3(801� = 0:20Psf b. w(A = I•$(UL)j+Ui I. A Suppoef ' UJLL = l.$(-I 1554) =-86psF Z. 4f �FpfW. Wu = j, g 6/caz �-90 I) -/44Z Psi 4, De�ermirie +-he mci-x mLkm moment u.ti. ozr- -r-o r eac, o\ j o o-d �-o �! e�t r..►�,,e e rnaz ►-1L4," Ioad ,-o� cond,'�io�-, W►THour LPL-IF i W►,►i UP1;Lt XPAM ' •,.. , VJLk-D.4 Wd+1.8 We 8. RUN Wu=o.clWa+►�$WG, RM-1 4DY A-i P.DY A-I 0. ENTEI 0. ENTER' 128. EHTEI 0. ENTER" B. ENTE; 8. ENTER" 1,476. XEP 1,355. XEQ d XEP 8. XER C Mgt_ -18,475. ** MW_ -14,453. **+ 8. XEP 8. XEA V4 = -6,416. ** Vk= -5,420. **+ XRO!1 "CANT XROM 'CANT' _? L=? W,� LAJ z I.StWd{W UY A-I RDY A-I 0. ENTER' 0, ENTEP' -1,314. ENTEP-! 1,442. ENTER 8. ENTER' S. ENTER* 34. XEP d -86, XEGi d S. XEC. MIA 27,66- _ Mu = - Vtuz 5,12- V,4 MkXil►lu►rl Moyne•^; = 31.7 �t--KrPs MaX�wt�wi 5 bear Z '6�4 �CiPS w,Q EAS7- S/o,6 C-2eaAV 2ivE2 STIZvcTUtZ4L- Gwr3C. W INGw-i9LL- 18 19 SIYNCC t-ke maXl M LA.v►'l Morrre.nt is PO.sI'l-,'Ve TIne keel wr1l bend c/oWvlwcnrJS Uj ►'I-A fe.is(b7 jh f-ke IC + C-e. TV1ere I"S cL So cc Vlear))/ e urQ I n Q�a 4-1`v`e vno m e•l t /8 5r-� -i--.i-os) S o -f-o b e S"V'e fLki- 4-ke Same lDur-S +-Ae boffc.-n {•ece �zs 5. e�-erm i ne 4-k e m r'n i m u vn S }-eer( ►"e�u v�r„e . Q. �owie ✓rf` ('F��, �c ,�ti� 5}-�el� Tcp � .96-kw maces c�. = 13-3.5= 4.s-' -4-ra�S vie rre �-o u.t a l (• 31.7 FS -zzo 3/s- AS = 1. !8 ,'� �' ASP `�'-7 @ 6 "C,C o%H z As <, Aeswr b. (Top �' �3ol�om ,,y�(le� ib wa//) C Es-Zia 3/s- e= o.00z 3 As -- O,zy e / C. 6HEA2 STEEL ; Vu ; -7 Y A' s 4 Skeo r Sf-ren;+-k c f Gohc�,ct-e wi44tou.f S ee/: _I3 L 3.5 =9.s-" V= z ,'-7 b"d - A V/-f�CI ')/00 0 = 15 ic.q�S. S Ncmc .V > V'h +-kQ0 ha stleu.r S/-ee/ "'s n'ecc(eci . INTEONAL STAJSILIT4 — ToE or FoarllyG iv,spec+-,,or, i-�Q Toe w a ue I�ss �orr,e.,r Lt vl.c( S h ec,r 0.C.1-r",/ m h /'f f-''c Lt--'--/. Co"4-Inure }'L.e �ri vtc ilo`' I S I of +ham heel into b, Oeferm 'ite t ke Tewiper,tJ tnv- j'►i t-tie Toe 5lglo pcLmlle( f-s wull - �. toP ce s l=X� Pos c e { � e oO3 � �s-o, 3►h U,5 A = 0.4-q LvA 0 6 5 T S!DC G2CEN ,e/!/19'-2 A/ZTS 112 U c T v 2 R-C. Cr w b C- l.(J f N F w / Z, Boti-orn Face L Un ex(oosed ooZ. Z S i o Z J U S e '`'�S C I Z`G C. J A = SKETCH STEEL LAYOUT 2 i�o,v,r Cc.t�oF� a�+erha�'e �6� nl @ 4�, th t17P 6 �f PdCO 6-2.5-94` W 6fi sP 5 p $r K(L= !ev{I � wbf3 ulbf4 �vs-. vIL Ph a w�= 12, 1 � gs _ ,6s, PGA z 3000 165. Ka- w Z Fv o = Wo + Wb- � f wbf 4- LUb�3 _> R = RI 00+ 1798 4-64�) f LD.4 fgPl- 3000 = tS, qDg 16s, E,-Side- 6 �-�� R ►v�-f— x w X4 y 3 res iS{i,KO W. w 4- WbfZ' xaa2 4- whfs Xbf3 + (6400)() zS?7$2 -F-•I .S , ZSj 71 o ve r'hc rK, .� 90$ N r P-1 C1�►�► � �.54 ��-r— �� �700C /s •G�-r�k �H�_f�_�,h�-ems u �a �n�5 S��r✓( _irl kb;— wb;- = (, 'fOo f /FSa f33000 X b� _ �, Wbf'� ' Xb ��40) 33) 4-(646d)(7) r _ 7, 03 � !� P—► C�K n e�� � Si c{ �i�-�-� dQ�v-� t�s 8C-D 6 zS Tl- A* IZ,oZ°# `i'03 ' Wd 8' Max, No m e kt-FA-- kee� 2(/Gz� C �61- Y 5, 1 P l J ,w ¢o fit- G s, r Nanf35 13* 9-0 Kit' -� _6 �l b .Y G5 2-�iivt Z y f� b C� 62-q b5 , > 6'90 2 )h Q1� • • �:t��-- p- I C�IR.Vt.►,�.�. C� ,S►dp G r ee � R �`v�P��S • ttX 7,1111.- de5lo:i V= i 16 �-36 r gzq = 3 9S8 16s, V L�(3 qSg� = S, 38Z vG _ -i,, K 0 7 ioosQ pe:� 3 K =30° Awl 3 ,( 3 17, z-37 e - /6s L F 7, ZI or,FV) 35, -7 3,�t- 5 2 SLOPE STABILITY DESIGN NARRATIVE ESGR - SW 16th to Grady Way Channel PROPOSED : A gabion wall is proposed for the West side of the P-1 channel between SW Grady Way and SW 16th Street . The gabion wall will tie into wingwalls proposed for the ends of the box culverts or bridges and will have plantings on top of each step back layer . An impervious membrane is to be installed at the bottom of the channel to reduce seepage of stream water into the drainage system of Oakesdale Avenue adjacent to the channel . GEOLOGY: The soils in the area consist of silts , fine to coarse sands , and sandy gravels layered by stream deposition . Data from five geotechnical reports for adjacent construction was reviewed to develop the soils parameters listed below that are used in this analysis . dry wet sat buo tan Unified Depth Wt Wt Wt Wt 0 0 c --------------------------------------------------------------------- • In-place material A ML/SM 0 - 7 75 90 110 48 28 . 532 0 B SP 7 -17 100 115 125 63 34 . 674 0 C SP/GW 17-27 110 125 131 69 37 . 753 0 H SW/GW 27 + 140 45 1 . 0 0 Fill D ML/SM 100 116 124 62 28 0 . 532 0 E SP 110 120 128 65 34 0. 674 0 F Gravel 130 37 0 .753 0 G Gabions 130 45 1 .000 572 ANALYSIS : A slope stability analysis was run using a computer program based on the New York Highway Dept 's NYSLOP . This program uses the method of slices to determine and search for a minimum factor of safety. The program was modified by SCS in Montana to include seismic coefficients to simulate static seismic analysis . The program has been run numerous times and checked by hand calculations . The program can model consolidation or seepage effects on the slope , as well as the effects of earthquake loadings . s RESULTS : The slope stability analysis of the gabion wall indicated a favorable factor of safety of 1 . 2+ without earthquake effects for the final configuration. An assumed seepage condition (greatest failure potential ) was used in the analysis . This is the condition that could occur when the pumps draw down the pond level during a storm. The ground will be saturated at some level (assumed at elev. 10) with the seepage zone sloping to the channel . Soil mechanics values are conservative and the cross— section used was the most critical . • a Aw De�2vv��nt CoLtas�o� � {-�� �� �sZc1o� Qh lyl�rwt ,n�°s a71 ►', Adx m • 2.a /65 /1C- /c y Z=Z / cj Q /L9 -5-7-? �cFU. 2oy3 , 87 �s� L PROJECT: esgr DATE: 5-1-89 -SST SEQUENCE NUMBER: 1 'Rnit. X coord. center of failure arc (ft.) 25.00 Init. Y coord. center of failure arc (ft.) 20.00 Init. radius of failure arc (ft.) 37.00 Init. X and Y increment (ft.) 5.00 Init. radius increment (ft.) 5.00 Init. seismic factor .15 WASHINGTON MODIFIED NYSLOP X1 Yl X2 Y2 W F C U 1 -100.0 .0 .0 .0 90.00 .532 0. 1.000 2 .0 .0 4.5 -1.5 90.00 .532 0. 1.000 3 4.5 -1.5 7.5 -1.2 130.00 1.000 0. 1.000 4 7.5 -1.2 7.8 -4.2 130.00 1.000 0. 1.000 5 7.8 -4.2 9.3 -4.0 130.00 1.000 0. 1.000 6 9.3 -4.0 9.6 -7.0 130.00 1.000 0. 1.000 7 9.6 -7.0 11.1 -6.8 130.00 1.000 0. 1.000 8 11.1 -6.8 11.2 -9.1 130.00 1.000 0. 1.000 9 11.1 -9.1 20.1 -12.1 -125.00 .674 0. .504 10 20.1 -12.1 24.1 -12.1 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 11 24.1 -12.1 51.1 -12.1 62.40 .010 0. 1.000 12 24.1 -12.1 31.6 -14.6 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 i 13 31.6 -14.6 43.6 -14.6 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 14 43.6 -14.6 51.1 -12.1 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 15 51.1 -12.1 200.0 -12.1 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 16 2.5 -1.5 4.5 -1.5 130.00 .753 0. 1.000 17 4.5 -1.5 5.5 -11.0 130.00 .753 0. 1.000 18 2.5 -1.5 3.2 -7.0 90.00 .532 0. 1.000 19 -100.0 -5.0 3.2 -7.0 -125.00 .674 0. .504 20 3.2 -7.0 3.5 -11.0 -125.00 .674 0. .504 21 3.5 -11.0 5.5 -11.0 -125.00 .674 0. .504 22 11.1 -9.1 11.5 -10.1 130.00 .674 0. 1.000 23 5.5 -11.0 11.5 -10.1 -125.00 1.000 0. .504 24 -100.0 -12.0 20.1 -12.1 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 25 20.1 -12.1 21.4 -16.0 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 26 21.4 -16.0 200.0 -16.0 65.00 .674 0. 1.000 27 21.4 -16.0 21.5 -17.0 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 28 -100.0 -17.0 21.5 -17.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 29 21 .5 -17.0 21.7 -18.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 30 21.7 -18.0 200.0 -18.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 31 -100.0 -27.0 200.0 -27.0 140.00 1.000 0. 1.000 COHESIVE NORMAL OVERTURN HORIZ VERT RADIUS S.F. D.S.F. .0 19920.2 8111 .9 25. 20. 37. 1.597 1.198 .0 42592.0 13351.6 25. 20. 42. 2.303 1.771 .0 14143.0 5209.9 30. 20. 37. 1.987 1.534 .0 35694.4 10537.3 30. 20. 42. 2.428 1.930 .0 25158.8 9860.7 20. 20. 37. 1.662 1.212 .0 47326.3 14497.8 20. 20. 42. 2.361 1.775 .0 22722.5 8738.7 25. 25. 42. 1.679 1.237 .0 46010.9 13677.9 25. 25. 47. 2.425 1.848 .0 17074.3 6225.1 30. 25. 42. 1.989 1.508 n tncn� i1-7,r,A Q 9S A7 9 A77 1 . 046 WOJECT: esgr DATE: 5-1-89 TEST SEQUENCE NUMBER: 2 Init. X coord. center of failure arc (ft.) 14.00 Init. Y coord. center of failure arc (ft.) 3.00 Init. radius of failure arc (ft.) 18.00 Init. X and Y increment (ft.) 2.00 Init. radius increment (ft.) 2.00 Init. seismic factor .15 WASHINGTON MODIFIED NYSLOP X1 Y1 X2 Y2 W F C U 1 -100.0 .0 .0 .0 90.00 .532 0. 1.000 2 .0 .0 4.5 -1.5 90.00 .532 0. 1.000 3 4.5 -1.5 7.5 -1.2 130.00 1.000 0. 1.000 4 7.5 -1.2 7.8 -4.2 130.00 1.000 0. 1.000 5 7.8 -4.2 9.3 -4.0 130.00 1.000 0. 1.000 6 9.3 -4.0 9.6 -7.0 130.00 1.000 0. 1.000 7 9.6 -7.0 11.1 -6.8 130.00 1.000 0. 1.000 8 11.1 -6.8 11.2 -9.1 130.00 1.000 0. 1.000 9 11.1 -9.1 20.1 -12.1 -125.00 .674 0. .504 0 20.1 -12.1 24.1 -12.1 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 11 24.1 -12.1 51.1 -12.1 62.40 .010 0. 1.000 12 24.1 -12.1 31.6 -14.6 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 13 31.6 -14.6 43.6 -14.6 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 14 43.6 -14.6 51.1 -12.1 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 15 51.1 -12.1 200.0 -12.1 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 16 2.5 -1.5 4.5 -1.5 130.00 .753 0. 1.000 17 4.5 -1.5 5.5 -11.0 130.00 .753 0. 1.000 18 2.5 -1.5 3.2 -7.0 90.00 .532 0. 1.000 19 -100.0 -5.0 3.2 -7.0 -125.00 .674 0. .504 20 3.2 -7.0 3.5 -11.0 -125.00 .674 0. .504 21 3.5 -11.0 5.5 -11.0 -125.00 .674 0. .504 22 11.1 -9.1 11.5 -10.1 130.00 .674 0. 1.000 23 5.5 -11.0 11.5 -10.1 -125.00 1.000 0. .504 24 -100.0 -12.0 20.1 -12.1 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 25 20.1 -12.1 21.4 -16.0 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 26 21.4 -16.0 200.0 -16.0 65.00 .674 0. 1.000 27 21.4 -16.0 21.5 -17.0 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 28 -100.0 -17.0 21.5 -17.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 29 21.5 -17.0 21.7 -18.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 30 21.7 -18.0 200.0 -18.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 31 -100.0 -27.0 200.0 -27.0 140.00 1.000 0. 1.000 COHESIVE NORMAL OVERTURN HORIZ VERT RADIUS S.F. D.S.F. .0 14605.8 7266.3 14. 3. 18. 1.343 1.001 .0 19847.1 8898.2 14. 3. 20. 1.487 1.132 .0 12498.7 6782.5 16. 3. 18. 1.237 .926 .0 18034.9 8728.4 16. 3. 20. 1.370 1.034 .0 10317.7 6021.7 18. 3. 18. 1.279 .960 .0 16086.1 8144.2 18. 3. 20. 1.306 .990 .0 11870.1 6536.3 18. 5. 20. 1.325 .990 .0 17133.5 8384.2 18. 5. 22. 1.346 1.017 ohs td L L FE 15 0 L d C 10 Pc_ lcl `co LOW FLOW CHANNEL bC Zo !t 1 s 2,5 cv L LF L F5 �.251 og - �o^ -�1 plc✓ — 2.v 2 - _,,,_ _ 1 • ID 071 LJ —ieCD ^_l �.�e' -Iti 31 c� `y° P -- 1 CHANNAL CROSS SECTI ❑ N L Q NOT T6 sc.&A-E . ti� do to 0 130 J` o.`,l t !V 6•"�"'1 va 1.:� I ::.��1 - t `. 1l ;,l e%-� h• , �` LAW FLOW CHANNEL B❑ 2,5 Gib 4�3 / :... ` ✓.�i 34- 3 J v 0 s W,�,+° P - 1 CHANNAL�o CROSS SECTION PROJECT: ESGR - Connecting Channel DATE: 5-2-89 TEST SEQUENCE NUMBER: 1 Init. X coord. center of failure are (ft.) 25.00 iit. Y coord* center of failure arc (ft.) 20.00 nit. radius of failure arc (ft.) 35.00 nit. X and Y increment (ft.) 4.00 Init. radius increment (ft.) 4.00 Init. seismic factor .15 WASHINGTON MODIFIED NYSLOP X1 Y1 X2 Y2 W F C U 1 -10.7 .0 .0 .0 116.00 .532 0. 1.000 2 -100.0 .0 -10.7 .0 90.00 .532 0. 1.000 3 .0 .0 4.5 -1.5 116.00 .532 0. 1.000 4 4.5 -1.5 7.5 -1.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 5 7.5 -1.5 7.6 -4.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 6 7.6 -4.5 9.1 -4.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 7 9.1 -4.5 9.2 -7.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 8 9.2 -7.5 10.7 -7.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 9 10.7 -7.5 10.8 -9.4 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 10 10.8 -9.4 19.8 -12.4 -124.00 .532 0. .508 11 19.8 -12.4 23.8 -12.4 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 12 23.8 -12.4 50.8 -12.4 62.40 .010 0. 1.000 13 23.8 -12.4 31.3 -14.9 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 14 31.3 -14.9 43.3 -14.9 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 15 43.3 -14.9 50.8 -12.4 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 &6 50.8 -12.4 200.0 -12.4 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 17 1.0 -1.5 4.5 -1.5 130.00 .753 0. 1.000 18 4.5 -1.5 4.6 -7.5 130.00 .753 0. 1.000 19 1.0 -1.5 1.1 -7.0 116.00 .532 0. 1.000 20 -10.7 .0 -3.7 -7.0 90.00 .532 0. 1.000 21 -100.0 -5.0 -3.7 -7.0 -125.00 .674 0. .504 22 -3.7 -7.0 1.1 -7.0 -124.00 .532 0. .504 23 1.1 -7.0 1.2 -9.5 -124.00 .532 0. .504 24 3.0 -7.5 4.6 -7.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 25 3.0 -7.5 3.2 -9.5 130.00 .753 0. 1.000 26 1 .2 -9.5 3.2 -9.5 -124.00 .532 0. .500 27 3.2 -9.5 3.3 -11.9 -124.00 .532 0. .500 28 -3.7 -7.0 3.3 -11.9 -125.00 .674 0. .504 29 10.8 -9.4 10.9 -11.0 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 30 6.2 -11.0 10.9 -11.0 -128.00 .674 0. .516 31 6.2 -11.0 6.3 -11.9 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 32 3.3 -11.9 6.3 -11.9 -128.00 .674 0. .516 33 -100.0 -12.0 19.8 -12.4 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 34 19.8 -12.4 20.5 -16.0 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 35 20.5 -16.0 200.0 -16.0 65.00 .674 0. 1.000 36 20.5 -16.0 20.6 -17.0 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 37 -100.0 -17.0 20.6 -17.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 38 20.6 -17.0 20.8 -18.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 39 20.8 -18.0 200.0 -18.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 40 -100.0 -27.0 200.0 -27.0 140.00 1.000 0. 1.000 16 COHESIVE NORMAL OVERTURN HORIZ VERT RADIUS S.F. D.S.F. 3687.2 11685.1 5998.4 25. 20. 35. 2.049 1.564 .0 27920.9 11191.2 25. 20. 39. 1.693 1.283 .0 46709.0 14996.5 25. 20. 43. 2.258 1.747 L C L n /_ /_Cn 7 n 7nC0 n -in \ nn O L I$ On 7 n I1nc .0 41615.3 13095.5 29. 20. 43. 2.290 1.812 1975.3 17337.9 8267.4 21. 20. 35. 1.668 1.232 .0 32785.6 12694.8 21. 20. 39. 1.775 1.314 .0 21649.0 9467.4 17. 20. 35. 1.494 1.064 .0 37816.8 13497.2 17. 20. 39. 1.951 1.411 .0 27221.5 9952.8 13. 20. 35. 1.816 1.247 .0 43350.8 13878.9 13. 20. 39. 2.203 1.561 . .0 24796.2 9868.3 17. 24. 39. 1.645 1.149 .0 41111.6 13834.4 17. 24. 43. 2.071 1.478 1585.5 19869.0 8847.7 21. 24. 39. 1.637 1.190 .0 35751.2 13024.4 21. 24. 43. 1.888 1.380 � 1 PROJECT: esgr - connecting channel DATE: 5-2-89 WIST SEQUENCE NUMBER: 2 Init. X coord. center of failure arc (ft.) 12.00 Init. Y coord. center of failure arc (ft.) 8.00 Init. radius of faIlure arc (ft.) 22.00 Init. X and Y increment (ft. ) 2.00 Init. radius increment (ft.) 2.00 WASHINGTON MODIFIED NYSLOP X1 Yl X2 Y2 W F C U 1 -10.7 .0 .0 .0 116.00 .532 0. 1.000 2 -100.0 .0 -10.7 .0 90.00 .532 0. 1.000 i3 .0 .0 4.5 -1.5 116.00 .532 0. 1.000 4 4.5 -1 .5 7.5 -1.5 130.00 1 .000 572. 1 .000 5 7.5 -1.5 7.6 -4.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 6 7.6 -4.5 9.1 -4.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 7 9.1 -4.5 9.2 -7.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 8 9.2 -7.5 10.7 -7.5 130.00 1 .000 572. 1.000 9 10.7 -7.5 10.8 -9.4 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 10 10.8 -9.4 19.8 -12.4 -124.00 .532 0. .508 11 19.8 -12.4 23.8 -12.4 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 12 23.8 -12.4 50.8 -12.4 62.40 .010 0. 1.000 13 23.8 -12.4 31.3 -14.9 62.00 .532 0. 1 .000 14 31.3 -14.9 43.3 -14.9 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 15 43.3 -14.9 50.8 -12.4 62.00 .532 0. 1 .000 16 50.8 -12.4 200.0 -12.4 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 17 1.0 -1.5 4.5 -1.5 130.00 .753 0. 1.000 18 4.5 -1.5 4.6 -7.5 130.00 .753 0. 1.000 19 1.0 -1.5 1.1 -7.0 116.00 .532 0. 1.000 20 -10.7 .0 -3.7 -7.0 90.00 .532 0. 1.000 21 -100.0 -5.0 -3.7 -7.0 -125.00 .674 0. .504 22 -3.7 -7.0 1.1 -7.0 -124.00 .532 0. .504 23 1.1 -7.0 1.2 -9.5 -124.00 .532 0. .504 24 3.0 -7.5 4.6 -7.5 130.00 1 .000 572. 1 .000 25 3.0 -7.5 3.2 -9.5 130.00 .753 0. 1.000 26 1.2 -9.5 3.2 -9.5 -124.00 .532 0. .500 27 3.2 -9.5 3.3 -11.9 -124.00 .532 0. .500 •28 -3.7 -7.0 3.3 -11.9 -125.00 .674 0. .504 29 10.8 -9.4 10.9 -11.0 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 30 6.2 -11.0 10.9 -11.0 -128.00 .674 0. .516 31 6.2 -11.0 6.3 -11.9 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 32 3.3 -11.9 6.3 -11.9 -128.00 .674 0. .516 33 -100.0 -12.0 19.8 -12.4 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 34 19.8 -12.4 20.5 -16.0 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 35 20.5 -16.0 200.0 -16.0 65.00 .674 0. 1.000 36 20.5 -16.0 20.6 -17.0 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 37 -100.0 -17.0 20.6 -17.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 38 20.6 -17.0 20.8 -18.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 39 20.8 -18.0 200.0 -18.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 40 -100.0 -27.0 200.0 -27.0 140.00 1.000 0. 1.000 COHESIVE NORMAL OVERTURN HORIZ VERT RADIUS S.F. D.S.F. .0 17981.7 8335.6 12. 8. 22. 1.434 1.047 .0 24610.6 10355.7 12. 8. 24. 1.586 1.158 867.5 16049.1 8001.8 14. 8. 22. 1.426 1.052 .0 21418.8 10144.9 14. 8. 24. 1.401 1.026 .0 28683.6 12062.7 14. 8. 26. 1.649 1.226 2044.8 13613.0 7431.3 16. 8. 22. 1.615 1.208 .0 18701.3 9544.2 16. 8. 24. 1.276 .957 .0 25912.1 11795.7 16. 8. 26. 1.504 1.125 2741.1 10815.9 6488.5 18. 8. 22. 1.702 1.292 935.5 17129.0 8970.7 18. 8. 24. 1.362 1.031 .0 22879.0 10979.2 18. 8. 26. 1.408 1.065 1913.7 14790.5 7707.8 16. 10. 24. 1.613 1.197 .0 21293.7 10226.4 16. 10. 26. 1.370 .999 .0 27425.4 11993.7 M. 10. 28. 1.563 1.163 2232.6 12124.5 6904.7 18. 10. 24. 1.628 1.223 • ROJECT: esgr connecting channel .ATE: 5-2-89 TEST SEQUENCE NUMBER: 3 Init. X coord. Cen t e r of failure arc (ft.) 14.00 Init. X and Y increment (ft. ) 2.00 Init. radius increment (ft.) 2.00 Init. seismic factor .15 WASHINGTON MODIFIED NYSLOP X1 Y1 X2 Y2 W F C U 1 -10.7 .0 .0 .0 116.00 .532 0. 1.000 2 -100.0 .0 -10.7 .0 90.00 .532 0. 1.000 3 .0 .0 4.5 -1.5 116.00 .532 0. 1.000 4 4.5 -1.5 7.5 -1.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 5 7.5 -1.5 7.6 -4.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 6 7.6 -4.5 9.1 -4.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 7 9.1 -4.5 9.2 -7.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 8 9.2 -7.5 10.7 -7.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 9 10.7 -7.5 10.8 -9.4 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 10 10.8 -9.4 19.8 -12.4 -124.00 .532 0. .508 11 19.8 -12.4 23.8 -12.4 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 12 23.8 -12.4 50.8 -12.4 62.40 .010 0. 1.000 13 23.8 -12.4 31.3 -14.9 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 14 31.3 -14.9 43.3 -14.9 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 15 43.3 -14.9 50.8 -12.4 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 16 50.8 -12.4 200.0 -12.4 62.00 .532 0. 1.000 17 1.0 -1.5 4.5 -1.5 130.00 .753 0. 1.000 18 4.5 -1.5 4.6 -7.5 130.00 .753 0. 1.000 19 1.0 -1.5 1. 1 -7.0 116.00 .532 0. 1.000 20 -10.7 .0 -3.7 -7.0 90.00 .532 0. 1.000 21 -100.0 -5.0 -3.7 -7.0 -125.00 .674 0. .504 22 -3.7 -7.0 1.1 -7.0 -124.00 .532 0. .504 23 1.1 -7.0 1.2 -9.5 -124.00 .532 0. .504 `24 3.0 -7.5 4.6 -7.5 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 25 3.0 -7.5 3.2 -9.5 130.00 .753 0. 1.000 26 1.2 -9.5 3.2 -9.5 -124.00 .532 0. .500 27 3.2 -9.5 3.3 -11.9 -124.00 .532 0. .500 28 -3.7 -7.0 3.3 -11.9 -125.00 .674 0. .504 29 10.8 -9.4 10.9 -11.0 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 30 6.2 -11.0 10.9 -11.0 -128.00 .674 0. .516 31 6.2 -11.0 6.3 -11.9 130.00 1.000 572. 1.000 32 3.3 -11.9 6.3 -11.9 -128.00 .674 0. .516 33 -100.0 -12.0 19.8 -12.4 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 34 19.8 -12.4 20.5 -16.0 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 35 20.5 -16.0 200.0 -16.0 65.00 .674 0. 1.000 36 20.5 -16.0 20.6 -17.0 63.00 .674 0. 1.000 37 -100.0 -17.0 20.6 -17.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 38 20.6 -17.0 20.8 -18.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 39 20.8 -18.0 200.0 -18.0 69.00 .753 0. 1.000 40 -100.0 -27.0 200.0 -27.0 140.00 1.000 0. 1.000 COHESIVE NORMAL OVERTURN HORIZ VERT RADIUS S.F. D.S.F. 434.3 15278.2 8197.1 14. 3. 18. 1.269 .959 .0 20165.8 10068.7 14. 3. 20. 1.331 .994 2006.5 12766.7 7473.8 16. 3. 18. 1.523 1.163 .0 17620.9 9408.1 16. 3. 20. 1.221 .936 .0 23665.9 11275.4 16. 3. 22. 1.473 1.123 2762.3 9661.5 6100.8 18. 3. 18. 1.639 1.272 1140.7 16038.2 8780.9 18. 3. 20. 1.377 1.064 .0 21304.8 10479.8 18. 3. 22. 1.406 1.082 1462.4 13997.2 7855.5 16. 5. 20. 1.435 1.089 .0 20237.8 10228.6 M. 5. 22. 1.301 .987 .0 26926.8 12216.1 16. 5. 24. 1.549 1.168 O L7L A i »no 9 coiv 10 c D 2y120 �SvV2- Cohl/(t�i�Kq C�laVth+z,' KA i CASE 2 - ��wtL- �1`a Iv �i��\�� LAW FLOW CHANNELb` 2.5 LT , ID �s= 1.7 . w' 690 s-7 W _ '�� C6 - P -- 1 CHANNAL CROSS SECTION y S' 1 1 NOT TO SG4L-E to : David Dishman , SCS, Renton, Wa. Subjr Stability analysis of Gabion Wall , P-1 Channel Date: 4/25/89 Attached are the computations for slope stability, overturning , and sliding analysis of the gabion wall . A computer- program was used to fac i I i tate the slope stab i I i ty analysis. Our first analysis considered 4 layers of baskets ( 12 foot high wall ) as being the most critical section . This resulted in factors of safety (FS) less than 1 .0 for a sliding wedge type failure and ,just over 1 .0 for a circle failure . A summary of the results is shown on sheets 19 to 1 . Following our telephone conversation last week , when you indicated that the sponsors were going after- more land rights, we redid the analysis using 3 layers of baskets similar- to your original proposal . I still had a problem with sliding , FS = 1 . 1+, which is considerably less than the • 1 .5 normally recommended ( no computations attached for this analysis ) . Therefore we changed the layout to increase the base width by 1 .5 foot and included a key ( see sheet 1 for layout ) . This resulted in FS = 1 .c-"'+( sheet 3) for sliding . The slope analysis for this configuration was also favorable with factors of safety of 1 .2 and 1 .3 ( sheet 12) for the water- table at 8 feet and 5 feet from the bank surface respectively. I assumed the gabions weighed 150 Ibs/cu. ft . for the sliding and overturning analysis which might be high but even if less the FS are adequate to allow for some variance. 160 Ibs/cu. ft . was assumed for the slope analysis but if you look: at the failure circle ( sheet 12) and the failure wedge ( sheet 18) it is evident that the added weight increases the driving farce and therefore possibly makes the analysis conservative. I suggest that you look over the layout, assumptions and analysis and if any problems give me a call . C �vLQ"�^'12 Leland M. Saele COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev. "9 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE t� PROJECT n I a BY DATE GV CHECKED BY DATE e J JOB NO. G rrI S 4 zo e SUBJECT �. . // CTvbio7'! W d�l SHEET OF l---r-'- I ---- -; - _- i i -$ 1► '' i _ 1, ba aC • YN i yv I F r--- -- --- ---- r - -- rl c, _ -rX . I F , • 11 I o N M o. -$CS—ENG-523 Rw. B--69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE PROJECT BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. L SUBJECT SHEET OF --{ -a-- j { p If i i 1 - i � � .- 1 • iA Ica W r r 'b' It , W _,A to p_ 1 COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev_ 8-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE ft�n1 PROJECT Gc/ry. - BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO_ LDS q�z 8 SUB✓ECT OF ,.� i ---'i ---' '--- -- � �� cen e- rs. - - -- - _ of/ 4r22r "'�' c �r- ' Aas ell h'e Ne -le Sit �tr /vad as r�s s� _ S�� ' le 3�.4 5 = is-o-'6el 3 - ---- -- --- ,�-- � rt��-�ressu<-�e._ . % _ _ _. --- � _ ,�•1_ z: - rbu� off.',bask�r��s- '� _ _W4 le.- re.: — Ykcl I.;W� . /o!'e ssjere. m/?: 6oyLi S;o�s . o}'key. s= _ - - -- - - s 1 3-S i Saf ��S•ufe� ,� / �t o>rQ �o� lOZ,4�C3,5� �i3o-6Z.gX b) _ _ C.oriSiderea� .only COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev. 8-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE PROJECT BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. zo� SUBJECT SHEET_,j_ OF Drer7�u� 7 �• ' � 0.3 3 = is 23p � - - 4 T F - (� y �- - 7 — t Lo7G" Lo,utC.}�rt , ----3 --------- Lo wec_ ate. A. 5 SL 39 • _ .. O Z3c�- 5e�1 On. -4430 -,'Pfi Qlodle Th.iul ell 3 Zo S.o)05 9 CW �itL ,�FriCT•�C71 c (8� •/\�i1; = 'Y O �7 rt/l So:/_6��pt ls�,¢/= t;•5�C¢.$)(G7),(.Yb) _ 4 tessive 60,1 tcW+ = (67,)(3.5� C•5,�z _ 71 3 ✓ Via.,-J af�ve 50 z9 /6s lot . , i ; I - I 5 Or �5'�Z — = o1�9 olio 000i — --- S i - \ OF � y 5 �(1 \ PROF IL Gabion protected channel slope File lsgab3. in 16 8 0. 10. 6. 10. 2 10. 14. 12.67 2 111- 14. 12.67 16. 13.2 1 16. 13.2 21 . 21 . 1 21 . 21 . 22. 21 . 1 22. 21 . 26.5 22.5 2 26.5 22.5 33. 22.5 2 33. 22.5 40. 22.5 3 22. 21 . 23. 15. 1 23. 15. 23.5 10.5 1 14. 12'67 20.5 10.5 2 20.5 10.5 23.5 10.5 2 30. 15. 33. 22.5 3 24. 9. 30. 15. 3 16. 5. 24. 9. 3 0. 5. 16. 5. 3 SOIL 3 161 .0 163. 1 1000. 50. 0. 0. 1 125.0 130.0 0. 34. 0. 0. 1 120.0 125.0 0. 30. 0, 0, 1 WATER 1 62.4 7 0. 10. 6. 10. 16. 13.2 ���N ;3. 13.2 ' �� 25. 15. 30. 15. 40. 15. CIRCL2 10 10 1 . 14. 27. 40. 1 . 4. 0. 0. . \ +# RCSTABLS +# by Purdue University --Slope Stability Analysis-- Simplified Janbu, Simplified Bishop or Spencer s Method of Slices Run Date: . 4-21-89 Time of Run: 11 :00 am Run By: p nl Input Data Filename: lsgab3. ln Output Filename: lsgab3.out Plotted Output Filename: n PROBLEM DESCRIPTION eabion protected channel slope File lsgab3. 0n BOUNDARY COORDINATES 8 Top Boundaries y 16 Total Boundaries Boundary X-Left Y-Left X-Right Y-Right Soil Type No . (ft ) (ft ) (ft ) (ft ) Below end 1 .00 10.00 6.00 10.00 2 2 6.00 10.00 14.00 12.67 E 3 14.00 12.67 16.00 13.20 1 R 16.00 13.20 21 .00 21 .00 1 2I .00 21 .00 22.00 21 .00 / 6 22.O0 21 .O0 26.5O 22.50 e . 26.50 22.50 33.00 22.50 2 e 33 X0 22.50 40.00 22.50 8 9 22.00 21 .00 23.0O 15.00 1 10 23.00 15.00 23.50 10.50 1 11 14.00 12.67 20.50 10.50 2 12 20.50 10.50 23.5O 10.50 2 13 30.00 15.00 33.O0 22.50 3 14 24.00 9.O6 30.00 . 15.00 8 15 16.00 5.00 24.00 9.00 5 16 .00 5.00 16.00 5.00 3 1 ISOTROPIC SOIL PARAMETERS �.. 3 Type(s) of Soil Soil Total Saturated cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Piet . Type Unit Wt . Unit Wt . Intercept Angle pressure Constant Surface . 1 161 .0 163. 1 1000.0 50.0 .00 2 125.0 130.0 .0 34.0 .00 .0 1 3 120.0 125.0 .0 30.0 .00 .0 1 1 ' 1 PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE(S) HAVE BEEN SPECIFIED Unit Weight of Water = 62.40 Piezrmetric Surface No . 1 Specified by 7 Coordinate Points Point X-Water Y-Water No . (ft ) (ft ) 1 .00 10.00 2 6.00 10.00 3 16.00 13.20 4 23.00 13.20 5 25.00 15.00 6 30.00 15.00 7 40.00 15.00 1 A Critical Failure Surface Searching Method , Using A Random _ Technique For Generating Circular Surfaces, Has Been Specified . - 100 Trial Surfaces Have Been Generated . 10 Surfaces Initiate From Each Of 10 Points Equally Spaced Along The Ground Surface Between X = 1 .00 ft . and X = 14.00 ft . Each Surface Terminates Between X = 27.00 ft . and X = 40.00 ft . Unless Further Limitations Were Imposed , The Minimum Elevation At Which A Surface Extends Is Y = 1 .00 ft . 4.00 ft . Line Segments Define Each Trial Failure Surface. 1 Following Are Displayed The Ten Most Critical Of The Trial Failure Surfaces Examined . They Are Ordered - Most Critical First . * * Safety Factors Are Calculated By The Modified Bishop Method * * Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points ' ` ' No . (ft ) (ft ) 1 2.44 10.00 2 5.98 8. 13 3 9.84 7.06 _ / 4 13.83 6.86 5 17.77 7.52 . 6 21 .48 9.03 7 24.78 11 .29 8 27.50 14.22 9 29.53 17.67 10 30.77 21 .47 11 30.87 22.50 Circle Center At X = 12.8 ; Y = 25.2 and Radius, 18.4 *** 1 .309 *** Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No . (ft ) (ft) 1 2.44 10.00 2 5.99 8. 14 3 9.85 7. 10 4 13.85 6.94 5 ' 1 .7.78 7 67 �~ 6 21 .46 9.24 7 24.70 11 .59 8 27.34 14.59 9 29.26 18. 10 10 30.35 21 .95 11 30.38 22.50 Circle Center At X = 12.6 ; Y = 24 .9 and Radius, 18.0 *** 1 ' 331 *** 1 Failure Surface Specified By 12 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No . (ft ) (ft) 1 1 .00 10.00 2 4.46 7.99 3 8.23 6.65 4 12. 18 6.04 5 16. 18 6. 17 6 20.09 7.03 7 23.76 8.60 8 27.09 10.83 9 29.94 13.63 10 32.23 16.91 11 33.87 20.56 Circle Center At X = 13.5 ; Y = 27.5 and Radius~ 21 .5 � *** 1 . 344 *** Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No . (ft ) (ft ) 1 2.44 10.00 2 5.65 7.61 3 9.32 6.02 4 13.26 5.33 5 17.26 5.58 6 21 .08 6.75 7 24.53 8.77 ' 8 27.42 11 .54 9 29.58 14.91 10 30.90 18.69 11 31 .29 22.50 Circle Center At X = 14.2 ; Y = 22.4 and Radius, 17. 1 *** 1 .372 *** ���� . �� Failure Surface Specified By 10 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No. (ft ) (ft ) 1 5.33 10.00 2 9.05 8.52 3 12.99 7.83 4 16.99 7.98 5 20.87 8.95 6 24.46 10.70 7 27.62 13. 16 8 30.20 16.22 9 32.09 19.75 10 32.89 22.50 Circle Center At X = 14.3 ; Y = 27 .0 and Radius, 19.2 *** 1 .381 *** Failure Surface Specified By 10 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No . (ft ) (ft) «» \ . 4 16.84 7.47 5 20.70 8.50 6 24.22 10.40 7 27. 19 13.08 _ 8 29.45 16.38 9 30.87 20. 12 10 31 . 17 22.50 Circle Center At X = 14.5 ; Y = 24.2 and Radius, 16.9 *** 1 .382 *** ` 1 Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No . (ft ) (ft ) 1 5.33 10.00 2 8.73 7.89 3 12.52 6.61 4 16.50 6.22 5 20.47 6.75 6 24.20 8. 18 7 27.52 10.42 8 30.23 13.35 ` 9 32.21 16.83 10 ' 33.34 20.67 11 33.44 22.50 Circle Center At X = 16. 2 ; Y 23.6 and Radius, 17.4 *** 1 .459 *** Failure Surface Specified By 12 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No . (ft ) (ft ) 1 3.89 10.00 2 7.31 7.93 3 11 .07 6.57 4 15.03 5.99 5 19.03 6.20 6 22.90 7. 19 7 26.50 8.93 8 29.69 11 .35 9 32.33 14.35 10 34.33 17 81 . . 11 35.61 21 .61 12 35.72 22.50 Circle Center At X = 16.0 ; Y = 26. 1 and Radius , 20. 1 *** 1 .472 *** \ ' 1 Failure Surface Specified By 11 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No . (ft ) (ft ) � 3.89 10.00 2 7.76 8.99 3 11 .73 8.51 4 15.73 8.56 5 19.69 9. 14 6 23.54 10.24 7 27.20 11 .84 8 30.62 13.91 9 33.74 16.42 10 36.49 19.32 11 38.80 22.50 Circle Center At X = 13.4 ; Y = 38. 5 and Radius, 30 . 1 *** 1 .481 *** Failure Surface Specified By 12 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No. ` (ft ) (ft ) l 3.89 10.00 2 7.66 8.66 3 11 .58 7.90 4 15.58 7.75 5 19.56 8.20 6 23.42 9.26 7 27.07 10.88 8 30.44 13.04 9 33.44 15.69 ' 10 36.00 18.76 11 38.07 22. 18 12 38.20 22.50 Circle Center At X 14.6 ; Y = 34'0 and Radius, 26.3 *** 1 .481 *** 1 Y A X I S F T .00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 X .00 +--------- --------- ---------+---------+---------+ _ - } q _ � � 5.00 41 . f . . .1809. s a 3. .7 sQ� j .4 65. A 10.00 + . 7 . . �� . . . .8 . . . . 109. . . . 37 6 . . . . . . 4. 5 . . . . . -'- X 15.00 + . . . .8 . . . . . . - 3 10.9. . . . . . . 7 165 I 20 .00 + .� 9. . . . . . . . 8 . - . . . . . . ' .0� . . . . 73 S 25.00 + . . . . . . . ��. . - . . . . .8 0 . . . . . . 734 . 5 ',21 . . . • � . . . - . . . . .8 3• 5. . . . . . . . . .0.9. . . . 4 6:-1 . . . . . I . - . . . . .8 . .3. ff .5. . F 35.00 + .9. . . . . . . . • . . . . . .0 T 40.00 + I I . . . . . . . * * - Illegal Command Legal Commands - PROFIL ' � LOADS I I I y�aT E R SURFAC ro EXECUT `^ b EQ UA[:::E SOIL S p RANDOM CIRCLE C I RCL2 SLOU.: Q f E.I_O C E:::2 r I TM._Tc; /'� ' /�_/ ** PCSTABL5 ** by Purdue University --Slope Stability Analysis-- Simplified Janbu, Simplified Bishop or Spencer ` s Method of Slices Run Date: 4-21-89 Time of Run: 12: 15 pm Run By: pnj Input Data Filename: lsgab4. in Output Filename: lsgab4.out Plotted Output Filename: n PROBLEM DESCRIPTION Gabion protected channel slope File lsgab4. in BOUNDARY COORDINATES 8 Top Boundaries 16 Total Boundaries Boundary X-Left Y-Left X-Right Y-Right Soil Type No . (ft ) (ft ) (ft ) (ft ) Below Bnd 1 .00 10.00 6.00 10.00 2 2 6.00 10.00 14.00 12.67 2 3 14.00 12.67 16.00 13.20 1 4 16.00 13.20 21 .00 21 .00 1 5 21 .00 21 .00 22.00 21 .00 1 6 22.00 21 .00 26.50 22.50 2 7 26.50 22.50 33.00 22.50 2 8 33.00 22.50 40.00 22.50 3 9 22.00 21 .00 23.00 15.00 1 10 23 .00 15.00 23.50 10.50 1 11 14.00 12.67 20.50 10.50 2 12 20.50 10.50 23.50 10.50 2 13 30.00 15.00 33.00 22.50 3 14 24.00 9.00 30.00 15.00 3 15 16.00 5.00 24.00 9.00 3 16 .00 5.00 16.00 5.00 3 1 ISOTROPIC SOIL PARAMETERS 3 Type(s) of Soil Soil Total Saturated Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Piez . Tvoe Unit Wt . Unit Wt , 7ntnrrmn+ Annl = r""=+An+ q..,TA,= ' 1 161 .0 163. 1 1000.0 50.0 .00 2 125.0 130.0 .0 34.0 .00 .0 1 3 120.0 125.0 .0 30.0 .00 .0 l 1 1 PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE(S) HAVE BEEN SPECIFIED Unit Weight of Water = 62.40 Piezometric Surface No . 1 Specified by 7 Coordinate Points Point X-Water Y-Water No . (ft ) (ft ) 1 .00 10.00 2 6.00 10.00 3 16.00 13.20 4 23.00 13.20 5 25.00 15.00 6 30.00 15.00 7 40.00 15.00 1 A Critical Failure Surface Searching Method, Using A Random Technique For Generating Sliding Block Surfaces, Has Been Specified . The Active And Passive Portions Of The Sliding Surfaces Are Generated According To The Rankine Theory. 30 Trial Surfaces Have Been Generated . 3 Boxes Specified For Generation Of Central Block Base Length Of Line Segments For Active And Passive Portions Of Sliding Block Is 4.0 Box X-Left Y-Left X-Right Y-Right Height No . (ft ) (ft ) (ft ) (ft ) (ft ) 1 14.00 11 .50 16.00 11 .50 1 .00 2 19.00 9.50 21 .00 9.50 1 .00 3 23.50 9.50 26.50 9.50 1 .00 1 Following Are Displayed The Ten Most Critical Of The Trial Failure Surfaces Examined . They Are Ordered - Most Critical First . * * Safety Factors Are Calculated By The Modified Janbu Method * * Point X-Surf Y-Surf, No . (ft ) (ft ) 1 12.33 12. 11 t .2 14.22 11 . 11 = 19.01 9. 22 4 24.08 9.51 . S 25.96 13.04 6 27:84 16.57 7 29.71 E0. 10 3 30.99 22.50 **+ 1 .661 +++ Failure Surface Specified By 8 Coordinate Points Point X-Serf Y-Surf No . (ft ) (ft ) 1 13.02 1.e.34 2 14.50 11 .56 8 19.68 . 9.45 4 23.60 9.59 5 25.48 13. 1E 6 27.36 16.66 7 29.24 20. 19 \ _ " 50.47 22.50 +++ 1 .75E +# . 1 Failure Surface Specified By 8 Coordinate Points Point .-Surf . Y-Surf No . (ft ) . (ft ) 1 12.86 12 .29 E 14.59 11 .37 8 20.57 9.e0 4 2#.44 9.96 26 .32 13.49 6 26.20 17. 0E 7 80.08 20.55 8 31 . 11 2E.50 ++* 1 . 756 *** �.. Faileee Surface Specified By 8 Coordinate Points Point X-Serf Y-Surf Qo . <ffl rff > \ ' 2 14 .30 11 .57 3 20.26 9.05 4 24.52 9.89 5 26.40 13.42 6 28.28 16.96 ' 7 30 16 20 49 � . . 8 31 .23 22.50 *** 1 .760 *** 1 Failure Surface Specified By 8 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No . (ft ) (ft ) 1 12.85 12.29 2 14.77 11 .27 3 19.96 9.3+ 4 23.75 9.44 5 25.63 12.97 6 27.51 16.50 7 29.38 20.03 8 30.70 22.50 *** 1 .774 *** Failure Surface Specified By 8 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No . (ft ) (ft ) 1 12.85 12.29 2 15. 16 11 .06 3 20.97 9. 19 4 24.71 9.85 5 26.59 13.38 6 28.47 16.92 7 30.35 20.45 8 31 .44 22.50 *** 1 .8O9 *** 1 Failure Surface Specified By 8 Coordinate Points point X-Surf Y-Surf No. (ft ) (ft ) 1 12 .64 12.22 2 14.49 11 .23 \ 5 26.0/1 12.89 6 27.88 16.42 7 29.76 19.95 8 31 . 12 22.50 *** 1 .814 *** Failure Surface Specified By 8 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No . (ft ) (ft ) 1 13,20 12.40 2 14.98 11 .45 3 20.54 9.79 4 23.95 9.87 5 25.83 13.40 6 27.71 16.93 7 29.59 20.46 8 30.67 22.50 *** 1 .824 *** 1 -' Failure Surface Specified By 8 Coordinate Points o��N �� Point X-Surf Y-Surf No . (ft ) (ft ) 1 12.40 12. 13 2 14.48 11 .03 3 20.22 9.58 4 26.01 9.63 5 27'89 12.89 6 29.76 16.42 7 31 .64 19.95 8 33.00 22.50 *** 1 .860 *** Failure Surface Specified By 8 Coordinate Points Point X-Surf Y-Surf No . (ft ) (ft ) 1 13.41 12 47 . . 2 14.99 11 .63 3 20.36 9.74 4 24. 15 9.85 5 26.03 13.39 6 27.91 16.92 7 29.79 20.45 P. qo pp pp 4o l D Y A X I S F T .00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 X .00 +--------- -------- ---------+---------+---------+ - I 5.00 + A 10.00 + 3 - 12. X 15.00 + '63. . 17. I 20.00 + \` 42. I �\ J.9 S 25.00 + .9. .3 - �9 • •� .3 \ \ 2 30.00 + 9. �1- 9 _ 1 I o F 35.00 + _ I T 40.00 i I t x - I 1 iega l Command �*•3C#iEx ELEV. 15,0 7 3 x 3 GABION BASKET ' A 3 x 4,5 GABIGN BASKET 3 x 6 GABIO BASKET 'A,STE SEWER ` l ELEV. 2.5 _ ELEV, 2.6� 2,5 I 5.8 RENO MATT VARIES 3 / ELEV, -5,72 I 2.9 1 7.3 P - 1 CHANNAL CROSS S STA , 672 + 50 ( APPR i Y A X I S F T .00 5.00 10 .00 15.00 20.00 25.00 X .00 +---------+---- ----+---------+---------+---------+ 7 5.00 + • 7• .4. A 10.00 + .3. 4. 403,. . . . X 15.00 + • . 412. . . \ 7.!4 . . . . 043. . . . I 20.00 + .9 `2. 87 S 25.00 + , • . • � • I .4 I . . 30.00 + . . . . . .9. 5 . . • E3.7 . .63 •�� I 12 . . 1 _ . . . . .0. .4. . 5 . .7.0� . 9 5 F 35.00 + . • . • . . . . . . . � . . . : .7. T 40.00 + T . . . . . 1 *-*-��-�jc-�-��-���-sic-*x-�-►��-�*-►��c--x-��-�-*��-�x--���c--x--��ic-�t-� (, - Illegal Command Legal Commands - PROFIL r nnnc Y A x I S F T o2l .00 5.00 10 .00 15.00 20.00 25.00 x . 00 +---------+---- ----+---------+---------+---------+ l - 5.00 + A 10.00 + _ I x 15.00 + 61 . 7 I4 I 20.00 S 25.00 . 7 . . 6\ 7 30.00 + \ \�� 4 f7 F 35.00 + _ N _ I J T 40.00 + (J� Illegal Command * * Legal Commands - PROFIL LOADS TIES WATER sP 2 to ,�a sus Q � �� DS ' el 5 P ao�v in lD�x 2AA`�l5 y � G �� �k� a ofi�; �D,1 dP g��nat'►o✓15 a1" /, o �, (/'' channel Inver+ ?-1Gt/. v U3 o Q VIP t 3 O � �'1`kx�gi°sky d. SLAB 4ii=4p� TEST HOLE LOCATIONS CONNEC71 NG CHANNEL DESLGN CNANNE STABLLIT�Y i EAST 51DE GREEN T ivec WArezZ HE,D 5vj �=Izho�b Q=i��fs �E►,Koca W►�TEIZS�ED Pfja?CLT aFF1GE v: 3,ofP5 V=3.ZfPy MAR-4-H 1993 Engineers Planners ♦ s Economists Scientists October 14, 1987 S21810.ElN Mr. Bob Bergstrom Engineering Supervisor City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Bergstrom: Subject: Oakesdale Avenue Connection Analysis of Seepage Cutoff Requirements Along Oakesdale Adjacent to the P-1 Channel Design Criteria Supplement No. 6 This letter contains a summary of the design elements for seepage cutoffs along Oakesdale Avenue. Most of the cutoff elements will be constructed as part of the present contract work; however, because it is not possible to construct a portion of the cutoff systems at the same time as the con- struction of Oakesdale Avenue, this work must be included in later contract work. This design information and criteria must be conveyed to those who will be designing, detailing, and preparing the contract documents for the excavation and diversion of Springbrook Creek-to the new P-1 Channel loca- tion. The cutoff system is required prior to diversion of the flow in the P-1 Channel adjacent to Oakesdale Avenue. The present contract for construction of Oakesdale Avenue and the Washington State Department of Transportation high- occupancy vehicle (WSDOT HOV) contract for the widening of SR 405 provides for all of the elements of the seepage con- trol and cutoffs except for the following: o Grading and excavation for the new relocated P-1 Channel along Oakesdale Avenue upstream from the SR 405 box culvert to the SW 16th Avenue box cul- vert and downstream from the SR 405 box culvert to the SW Grady Way box culvert. o Preparation of the subgrade for the geomembrane liner. t CH2M HILL Seattle Office 777108th Avenue,N.E.Bellevue,Washington 206.453.5000 P.O.Box 91500,Bellevue,Washington 98009-2050 a ' Mr. Bob Bergstrom Page 2 October 14, 1987 S21810.E1 o Construction of an approximately 60-foot-wide geo- membrane liner along the Oakesdale Avenue retain- ing wall from SW 16th Avenue to the SR 405 box culvert and from the SR 405 box culvert to SW Grady Way. o Placement of sand cover materials over the liner and P-1 channel erosion protection. Figure 1 shows an overview of the project area. A discus- sion of the project elements noted above follows. BACKGROUND In order to meet vertical clearance requirements beneath the SR 405 overcrossing, Oakesdale Avenue must dip below SR 405 with a finish grade at the roadway low point at approxi- mately elevation 4. This elevation is below observed groundwater levels at the site and over one-half of the proj- ect roadway is below the design 100-year flood elevation (elevation 12) for the project. Thus, to remain serviceable to traffic, Oakesdale Avenue requires a permanent, pumped underdrain system to remove groundwater and surface water from the pavement section. Unconfined groundwater exists in pervious, coarse-grained materials encountered onsite. Material gradations indicate that a lower dense sand and gravel (existing below an ap- proximate elevation of -15) may be more permeable than an overlying fine-to-medium sand layer. Permeability coeffi- cients for these coarse-grained materials are estimated to be in the range of 1 x 10 to 1 x 10 cm/s . These esti- mates are based on the material gradations and permeability tests on representative samples of native materials per- formed by Hong Consulting Engineers for the P-1 box culvert at SR 405. The seepage into the Oakesdale Avenue roadway was estimated using flow net construction techniques at critical sections of the roadway. From the flow net analysis, a design con- sisting of a series of perforated underdrain "laterals" in- stalled in conjunction with a continuous drainage blanket was established. The drainage blanket collects and conveys groundwater from the roadway subgrade to the roadway "low point, " where groundwater and surface water are combined and i_ pumped to the P-1 Channel. Mr. Bob Bergstrom `i Page 3 October 14, 1987 S21810.E1 The P-1 Channel is only about 20 feet from the edge of the Oakesdale roadway. This proximity, and the elevation dif- ference of the respective finished grades, means a major retaining wall is required to separate the P-1 Channel from Oakesdale Avenue. This wall has a top elevation of 14 and a variable height soil backfill ranging from approximately elevation 13 at the north and south ends of the Oakesdale Avenue project (at SW Grady Way and SW 16th Street) to ap- proximately elevation 9 (where the wall ties into the P-1 Channel box culvert at SR 405) . Figure 1 shows the relative location of the P-1 Channel to Oakesdale Avenue. SEEPAGE CONTROL Control of seepage from the P-1 Channel is necessary for satisfactory performance and operation of the Oakesdale un- derdrain system. Effective seepage control is required to guard against piping of subsurface materials into the Oakesdale underdrain system. Such piping could create a "short circuit" in the seepage flow path between the roadway f and the channel. The retaining wall provides an adequate seepage barrier within the upper elevations along the P-1 Channel. However, seepage flow nets and head loss calcula- tions for seepage paths under the retaining wall from the P-1 Channel to Oakesdale Avenue indicate a piping problem will exist if proper measures are not taken. This is be- cause of the magnitude of the differential head and the proximity of the two facilities. The calculations indicate a critical need to provide a good filter zone around the underdrain gravel of Oakesdale Avenue and to improve the head loss characteristics of the subsurface soils between the P-1 Channel and Oakesdale Avenue. Because of the grada- tion of the native soils, it is essential that a geotextile fabric be placed to separate the roadway drainage materials from the native soil in order to control piping. Also, the fabric will prevent migration of fines into the gravel col- lection system and thus reduce the possibility of clogging. This work will be accomplished in the Oakesdale roadway con- tract. A seepage barrier is also required between Oakesdale and the P-1 channel to increase the seepage path and reduce seepage flows. A sheet-pile cutoff and low-permeability foundation material for the box culvert have been specified as a seepage barrier at the P-1 Channel box culvert at SR 405. These provisions Mr. Bob Bergstrom Page 4 October 14, 1987 S21810.E1 were selected because they required minimal change to the existing box culvert design and WSDOT HOV contract documents. Beyond the box culvert along the P-1 channel, however, two seepage barrier alternatives were evaluated for relative cost and effectiveness. The alternatives were a vertical sheet-pile cutoff wall and a horizontal geomembrane liner. Both systems have comparable installation costs. However, the geomembrane liner has the following advantages: o Improves seepage reduction by increasing the flow path between the channel and the roadway o Reduces potential of material "piping" into the underdrain system The sheet-pile cutoff is less effective than the liner be- cause of the relatively short depth to penetration refusal expected in the dense lower sand and gravel. The geomem- brane liner by comparison, will provide a much longer seepage path and, thus, a much more effective seepage bar- rier. Care must be exercised, however, in specifying bedding materials and allowable construction procedures to assure the integrity of the liner system. Several types of liners were considered, including various types of synthetic liners, such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC) , hypolon, and high-density polyethylene as well as a natural clay liner. The synthetic geomembrane liner was selected because of its ease of construction (discussed below) and its ability to provide a better seal along the P-1 Channel retaining wall and box culvert. A 30-mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC) geomembrane liner is recom- mended for the following reasons: o Readily available material o Low cost compared to other synthetic geomembrane types o Easily installed compared to other geomembrane types, i.e. , seaming in the field is much easier Mr. Bob Bergstrom Page 5 October 14, 1987 S21810.E1 than other types and is more tolerant of difficult construction conditions o Easier to repair because of its ability to seam in the field. LINER INSTALLATION Foundation preparation recommendations for the liner are as follows: o Dewater to 5 feet below the excavation to remove water influence on subgrade materials o Grade the subgrade smooth and proof roll or in- spect to ensure firm, compact subgrade to support liner and construction equipment without rutting o Remove any pockets of organics or open-graded gravels to improve liner effectiveness - It is essential that the design and specifications for con- struction minimize the potential for damage to the liner system during construction. This should be accomplished by specifying the types and adequate thicknesses of construc- tion materials used, compaction effort and equipment to pre- vent excessive loads and rutting, and use of proper moisture contents in the materials being placed. A minimum of 2 feet of native sand should be placed over the liner to protect it from construction equipment. A total of at least 5 feet of final cover (including the minimum 2-foot sand protection layer) should be provided over the liner to further protect it from hydrostatic uplift. The liner should extend the full width of the channel (approximately 60 feet) and should not be brought up the other side to create a "bath tub" ef- fect. This reduces the potential for hydrostatic uplift of the liner. Proper attachment of the geomembrane to the P-1 Channel re- taining walls and box culvert is critical to the effective- ness of the barrier. The liner should be connected to the top face of the footing using a continuous anchor plate, which will seal the geomembrane to the wall foundation. A large fold of excess PVC liner should be laid along the ver- tical toe of the retaining wall footing during liner insula- tion to allow for differential movement between the retaining Mr. Bob Bergstrom Page 6 October 14, 1987 y, S21810.E1 wall foundation and the liner system. An example of this type of connection is shown in the attached figure. Careful design of the anchor details is required to ensure proper connection to the wall footing without leakage. L-shaped transition walls (cutoff walls) will be constructed at the inlet and outlet of the, P-1 Channel box culvert at SR 405, which will provide a surface to which the liner can be connected. These transition walls will tie into the P-1 Channel box culvert with water stops to provide a continuous water barrier (refer to Figure 1) . Proper connection to the transition wall is important to minimize leakage. The geomembrane liner should be attached in a watertight manner as illustrated in the attached figure to both the SR 405 box culvert and to the Oakesdale Avenue retaining walls. A smooth rounded corner has been provided along the edge of the retaining wall footing for addition of the liner. The liner should attach to the horizontal face of — \ the cutoff walls along the upstream and downstream ends of the SR 405 box culvert. The liner does not need to be at- tached to the SW 16th Avenue or SW Grady Way box culverts, but the liner should extend to within 25 feet of these culverts. Because of the importance of providing an effective seepage barrier between the P-1 Channel and Oakesdale Avenue, we recommend that you forward this information to the P-1 Chan- nel designers- If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, rr -- Chris Sundberg, P.E. ' Project Manager tlm/se6015/114 Attachment cc: Chris Sundberg/CH2M Hill Ken Green/ CH2M Hill Frank Jenes/CH2M Hill CLAMPING 1'V�%"RAO/US COiPNEF�S S F"OL O BACK L.1NEiP COA fFPRESS/ON STR/P�S 7A/NL ESS S T�EL� - ROUNo co�P/vEF� CAUL K/NG G,EOTEAT/L E CAUL A//VG . 01A 9T4//VLE55 STEEL • FOL.O AS Sh/OW/\/ 3O M/L oVC LINER J NO TE'S: M/N /. T/GNTE^/ NUTS /N S7;QGES AS h",ECOi1�1MENOEQ 43 Y L//V//VG M�q/1/U�AC TUR'ER. DO NOT OVER T/GN TAN 0. OR•4 WING NOT TO SC.4L E_ 3. CAf?EF'UL O/S/G N O F' 'THE' CUMPRE S S/O/V STR/P, CLA/1i1f�//VG STi�'/P ANO ANCHORS /S REQU/REO TO . ENSURE �q PRp,oER SEAL TO -7WE' WALL. OIMENS/OHS Sh/OWN A/?E' A�PROXI 11�1.4 TE. EXAMPLE ATTACHMENT DETAIL NTS !Y d 20~ .o o rcFs SW loth St. t �� �� Box'Culy'dr t' j \ �`_ W 7Ul9 AA siCOA47^ ._a" w�srls .aR.x (co�.ce:,.^.� i 5NOmma Naas.Tull sw&l .r m+r Cue vxr r / n (WSDOT HOV Contract) _GEOMEMBRANE 0D-7 ATTACH GEOMEMBRANC 70 p -- / LINED AREA �`,� �-- XETAIN/Na.•WALL f`.p-I ? CHANNEL,7RAhS177ON WAS- OAKESDALE AVE. �o_a ;.� . �rL �~-"1.��� , - _ - - - - - _ - --- -- --' a,z'a- .- ' ,� • • �V6 PUMP CEOMEMBRANE LIAFED AREA - vI2 PfC^`�TL',J • �"�T>� __ ___f••� WALLS AS XE= :J IWMT.*I G�"_iVIT.GN. -�_ — —7 r t , .. L 25 ^xsd�T�r -S:ts 7 T ATTACH GEOMEMBRANE TO RETAINING WALL j F-1 - I l !of 1 %� ,iO /wed T CHA NNEL TRAN.5/,/ WA! / r / rylsTIAA5 `� SW Grady Way Box Culvert A. p Contr ct) l a � �' � b-4 i � ' •/ / // / � •� _ '--�- \ ' t r I � 1 i NG P-f CawM�l. _J - r /QAKESDALE AVE- ! i J O� l 4_// / FIGURE 1 - Oakesdale Ave. _ J r / I ! i CSCHEDULE A (3 y� c BEE C CITY OF RENTON c>a 7Fave-3r+avG. i ry ��r� \\ \\ O eerwwTrwNt or ►uOtIc woww• ' ! �� - RETAINING WALL PLAN- / AV � �/./� / t ;%,� o ,• A / ` `� OAKESDALE ENUE SW //A /-• SIP i 11 I I _ I9nr REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BOX CULVERT SOUTHWEST GRADY WAY RENTON, WASHINGTON FOR THE CITY OF RENTON GeoEngineers Incorporated Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists 77 , END OF HIGHWAY BRIDGE NORTH c+ A Y y 7i t SpR�NG8RO0K CRC6 r REVISED LOCATION CULVERT BOX // KEY: B-* B-1 BORING LOCATION AND NUMBER r SCALE: ORIGINAL PROPOSED PIDNEDW � LOCATION BOX CULVER T 0 5(. 100 FEET 3 ajar GeoEngineers Inc. S I Tr: PLAN BORING NO. 1 APPROXIMATE ELEVATION: 14 FEET ( i *GRAPHIC �y. 0 *TEST DATA LOG DESCRIPTION ML LIGHT BROWN VERY FINE SANDY SILT WITH A TRACE OF ORGANIC MATTER ( MEDIUM STIFF, DAMP) 7 5 . 1% 90 N 11'sp DARK BROWN VERY FINE SAND WITH A TRACE OF SILT (LOOSE, DAMP) w 5 u- 22 . 5% 89 Z'A7 0 w 8 o SP BLACK FINE SAND WITH A TRACE OF SILT (LOOSE, SATURATED) � �115 16 BLACK FINE SAND (LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE, SP SATURATED) BORING COMPLETED AT 19 . 5 FEET ON 10/8/84 I *SEE KEY FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS I GeoEngineers Inc. LOG OF EXPLORATION - DEPTH G 0t L MOISTURE CONTENT IN PER CENT 0 10 20 30 40 SO 60 140 PROJECT -O9 SAMPLE 130 SOIL TYPE tytv_�1WC, METHOD ID �SS7 OPTIMUM MOISTURE 1(671 MAXIMUM DENSITY Io(o 120 t t H 110 I ILIL f SPECIFIC GRAVITY 2.TO U i to 100 .40 J S Z • 9 Z W SPECIFIC GRAVITY E. O } cc } 8o i TO A i 60 1 ` 1 SO f f GeoEngineers Inc. COMPACTION TEST DATA r GEOLOGY REPORT EAST GREEN RIVER. STORAGE BASIN TO STATION 669:00 (SECTION 1) WASHINGTON STATE OCTOBER 1981 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE U.S.D.A. ! 'kip. .ry' �'•' a �( Y � �- `•':�• i �t• r Lr�'i'��` r,. .x; qi���«y`���,N` s �' r .5�� ,i r:at a r y ��••3. '*4�`x ,i,• rd•.t��-_: } a :.., r' � Er .ti ty •� •�' -.� �,,,a`ir�,y�; a�3yi ,f ?A t ids� '�"� ` ^ X a•'- :4 .�, 'r :, f ;3 'a, �.' i• . � �2��a>�:���t� d r�r y�l,. 'i �r{'•t,.. �4?F� t. 4 y y+1 y,Y }n r,•. �! y �saGt �{! '1'� r'.S �{r•S1 r. �'� .'S. 7.'' ,t r : a 4. }•.r T' l"< ✓'N �rx.. 'tX_ayr� }• �v 44 �-'y1'kh t,}_��Pr�'y`.�'�� ''�'i .t'• `.e ',aF Y;Rj<4/ �,�ti�d*t[di.T �(fs+k•j'`Y't'.y- -~.i.� 'i+o } t'.t,� rift {a a (> fit f7'+ l `' "'t'4 L'•y..•4i t�._•�-Y�4 y 1:' i , F->^ � ' 1� ytl.'t,�`'y'`l!T � �xyT � "•ay � " � , t> +`M���'a„� �. +`� y Y, f..Y{ •�+rT'ri i r.. r r "V...r,:� t r � 't -•IF r,7 1 F�!r .j yt dr . �r} .j , -'1t'• t n t'"� yti�1s r}:E fJx �tttl,; +v�•�1.�ti<p.t r> x $[ 5` ` 1 } '� E i• -•rk 4'2a''��'"'ir Nl jai 1 , t s''�pttpar ati F�6"�•Sad{.• �t� .t +} (�. •,L ♦x i N�' ,+ r ;�•� �4 r�;}'� as. .i N Isu4�' n,i 1'tr?>+iM., e `t�'"r..{ 'yam _ 4 1 f •tl' ji'�„ `�'' ! '� �° r^,r� 4r., `�,';;•:i y • -v � '1�; �' s,•q tax. Ii� :�ftrsrz M1,b �a.1F r�'i^.r BAR' l I�a� '#"� 2i � �,�.� ti•TF�+l � � � .� }r�� a- � P f 4ti` rr krt�p(fr ? � 1 (�'�F � ..?4>� /('> Y �f 1 ry. 1 t l.•• �� • '� } _ ::�4 +..♦ +Ly, at'I:S ' ;{'*'r td►` t- c n e a r.+; af+ rt 'yY 1 a•.9'ItY{i+ � p,Sf tr'. � o .�' o. '4•, 1 n'• � r.,.. •`ril�,. ✓ 7 t; 'fir„ t r Sy°� [ '� : .3.s• * � �'•, ,. ' ". t jr`d 4•) y (c'i r}77i} ) R, rx fP F' +'n1 y ' r' EE► 1�. •i! �.�N K t� :�v ry� I ':: �' ,a•- [.- rs � 4 t k• t-.. � ,� Y-. ♦vwr� + a�y fx {.,�t', �. 'r• r... ,a�y¢� .'� w., �' tt`.: � - r�, ,, -�f Erik d i''hx7�t �. ,r 1ti� i ".t i-V � 'f, � 1� 'n. '.�•� r adi.��+��i.i�5r Al pt S 't r :ss rl ' i+ rr•. }+M- r r � i a. Y•4'as i ° .,A �- 3•� ir6_ay y'iFTts ,rN+,ty�,• t ,1, tt •i�-"r, r(7 fo- .i ,ri.(. w!, A i� N �• r Rom•. s`s � �' "�•!/. + �r3���#+:t• � r'.: 5c.� P �y�..•S i, L$:t FM.� K ! .� a e�,.,�v� t[-v. 4 �� a r � vpi•' �tiit + {: t rI 4? t i� 11rra� •t .+ r 7 � � a- C '•i�, ila y�r d•* .�'�r4 -�.t�~` ( .;a� �•;��7��r Jt�rr _ a 4..:M !r<• 3r�>'•�'����✓nit' -'•��. T ` u.'r t i w{.-�•�rr�d �vre a Q}�,y,� -,ii�i/ ' bi.3 tr• � tr rpg�st �... i 9 '.' "y�'.v�J� � �!'ea�*"<'v}r 3 ` u.� i k71" t `t a�" '^ yr. {. t trtr �£�?A i•'.'kINK' .QK x� x qq r�t+ 4 a .Pi�.vt� .� ,r r F 'tr- �� k 1� e �. i, � '�ri• - i't . ra1E '�rf-• �r ���}� .+�r'��-'!.' ; � -`�1i• '�. r,:• � � ';( i 5 � t�;4,Mr bb�1`}� .: i.ws4 r?;S> 9r dr .t t �.• � - .��.t. {�},' .a i?� /a�nf '! t4!: `n r 1 r � t� 1f i`-r �} .- �: 'd�,M. � '� v• �.�./� iYF ,-�.t. r r 'i.. 9.it�%c{x;t,�^.'a?) s�`Srrk`� °- � t` �' /�i,. f, ,f , , �'+r'i;�� IEI� ��''v• r^r k: by 7.I' L ? >. f "� 1< •4 7? 12. • � ', {• iL a>r ,afsk 'a �1r � ro` �"+ .z ! -' <� :lR,r I '� i�5� T! _;; 4 ray rt�'t. 4r�� �'•r, r M ai�t•k y A �r Qr l �q'•E�' rid- W ` � F tx Mtis a i i.3,. {� +, � ;r; f �, ,4 •s ; ' r , =�; ti ' <�q �w ir �.•O-V '+w»4ip •,_ "�,�.a�. s''fit'. �r .�, fr �,e. ��i`,r�s K � ,ya'R �'. [t-•'.�'' aM1 r Y 1 , P4 f� i yV�'Y � �� �. ..i�••�'tK�'�d -^� WIN l . .` `s ,� t 4.' a• yt..�y�: r• '• of ��f r # f4 rrpr s� ri'4a. a . i� S�a .,- ti`"i r yyi> r M -r ff•p i� • �''� "; -..r x'F-r'��`�}'r,•�'� �. •� •to r WEI !4•�;3�' F. � 1� ��-��t'i4i-. r i ziK f ty a tr +`y4`.tt '? K �".-• ! i;. , i .t�rt 7Y.!k fir•/`� t'> (• �+ t I k, , ��i �.• r r F S a g, T` �:/i r �'p {..�� � - - rt a �N�1 .,-� �; y c• ,<�. na ,, y r- 6�.�.•GcSr�ic�'�t °r,�t. 'e .r r .9 �'• , > .#• af�+r<•- t} ''r'yv ..a `� :. '�� -i�,�r• v �^"Jti"4 �, �� r r atp .+ � Rt a �)iv S f��7 rta •h.`x '��`y�_ �iy ��;i +.}�N, ' . ,•` 333 �t'.:�tt.,ff•,'v� ''�+aF,r;:fl� ,,�. a, .�i. Jj '�::• .y1at': 1.� r s .. rr• r�Mr}.r }:. n - ..�a{{,,���� ,C.k :� b ;°•� #e 'i{J.:.1� d`�r i'(` t�'ate.- N .s 11 �r "'`� d a(4" 'if ,�Y S i !j'��' ,,yS. i�. f _ f. 'Ic Ilr` IFf1•rR.( t{+I4'� � F �� k� fM'�1 d1•rd >i f � ' c� T�67kf �l k x '� K � :bin R z � � ,x � � 'Cr �'l�•. �� 1 S'�.' 101E CONSE RVA T ERVICE ._ LOG OF TEST LES r_v .i e NATERSHED Ea' JSide Green River Su , 'j ERSHEo IS, I NO. — - \ "'t STATE OCATION OWNER WA Kin2 County _OGGED BY DATE PROJECT: John A.- Wilson1 15 81 WP-07 WP-06 X FP-03 P,L.-46 DRILLING EQUIPMENT LOCATION OF HOLES Track Mounted Ri P-1 Channel HOLE U SAMPLES STA. & DEPTH S TYPE 2 3 HOLE SURFACE FROM TO DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS N C BIT NO. TYPE FROM TO CSE. REM. REC. MIN. yb NO. ELEVATION FT. FT. S USED FT. I FT. % DIAM. 400 ���% 0 3.5 Silt, lastic, dk. ry. org. H 3.5 4.0 ( 2 p 4.014.5 ( 3 3.5I10. Silt non-plastic, brn. or . odor, soft — L .S S.0 3 S 10 10.5I 13 Sand, silty, VF, brn. W.T. @ 12.51 M 0,511. 1 _ S .0 . 13I21.E Sand, poorly graded, F-M, dk. gry. wet TD-21.5 Ft. 6.0 6.E 3 20 O-E 2 1. 3 16 _._ 0 3.5I 4 ( 1 401 0 4.0 Silt, plastic, dk. gry. org. H 4 4.5 0 41 17 Silt, brn non-plastic, or . odor, soft L 4 55.0 1 S g — I 50 17.2 17 .21. Sand poorlygraded, F-M dk. i . wet M . I E I W.T. @ 13.0" L B TD-21.5 Ft. Y 10 10. 1 0.511. 2 -- - -- 1.512. 2 I _ 15 115. ( 1 -- I 5.516. ( 1 6. 16. 2 20 20.5 1. DISTURBED-UNDISTURBED-ROCK CORE 2. COARSE MATERIAL REMOVED 3. PERCENT SAMPLE RECOVERY 20.5 21 3 21.021.5 5 Sheet 1 of Sheets U.S. SYO;DAkD SIEVE wa';;l i( ii., ii:Cli`ty --U.S, $TANDARD SIEVE NUMK 3 — - — - "yW. Z ENA �1 6 4 3 2 11h t '+ y4 ij 3 4 6 d 10 1416 20 3A 40 So 70 100 1-40 260 0 100 -r --1 10 90 r3 t0 30 70 i 4' 40 s 3 ao Y W 50 oc Z S0 O ir - u 60 i u 40 u 70 30 80 20 ! i 90 10 100 0 1 O.S 0.1 O.OS 0.01 0.005 0.001 S00 100 SO 10 S GRAIN SIZE MILLIMETERS CCKIILES GRAVEL SANG SILT OR CLAY COAII3E FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE SAMILE NO. Elie OR DIMH CIASSPICATON w"T W% u Pt M PROJECT EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER 1 20.0-21. 5 Si. SAND SM1 King rnlinty, Washington AREA "R r,No. TH-201 GRADATION CURVES NPD DATE 16 March 1981 81-S-293 V.{.{Otll{q�llfi NIff11N OI/IC{ IN{0/-1N'1{{ ENO FOWVI 2�87 ,U LACU wES FORM NO. 1241,SEI 11162.WHICH IS 06SCILM. 1 MAY 63 2 _ -. - � mmm'm Cm o 'CMCI�"_'C"Como MENEM 111 CmMCm C m M EEM " ■' . C ■. m. CE m MES CME .NCCECo ....0 E.so "m C C'm■E■m■■■■M■O■■■N■■OCma N■EC'C C■■M■. C■■ ■C■ ' ME'm 8 ■■■ ■■■■9■■■■■■■■■ ■■■r ■ ■ ■■ ■■■ CC m mCN C ■■ ■ In Zii.� . . .... ■■■■■■c.■■O■■...E■O■.. ■m.N■■m ON m EC m m ..t�..C.■■■..■..C........■.......SEEN .. .... ......... . . ■■. ..... mm m'm mmm mC . mmmm: am®mmCmmmonsommCmmmmommmCmmmNmmhmmmmaimmmmmoss mmmm:'mmCmMC E=C EE E■E■M N mE.■_. :i i■■■. MmE.■m■o■■■�■m!'■a■aeNel ■,a■■ ■ .EN■ m N■E■■MM o■■m m_ mnmn m■■.C=.■.■E.mm■' ■■■■ w ■■■E■ ■ ■■ ■ N■. N■ ■■■.■■N ■■■■■■■ ! it!■ m■smog Nmm CNoNI u■N ■E■■■ ■ENN■■ ■ ■E■■N. mN ■■EN ■ E.■■NN ■ ■N■■■■■■■■■■■ om ■■ mN ■ OMEN■ Mmomm�:mmomommmm �mmmiss OMENS ME m ommmmm momm ::CaEE■ C ■ NEE■■ . ■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■.■■■■■■■ ■■■ ■ NONE E■ ■■ .■OO■ ■ .n■■■ ■..■■ ■ ! E■EN■■ ■N■■■■■N . CoE ■■ ■■■■N ■■■NEON■ .■m mME mErM■mm�a'E Eo■E ■■.■ ■'■_ _ ■ ■=■■■mCmmom�.mCCm�.CCCmmmm�. '■CmmMEMNC::mmCmCoCOC :CmmmmC:m�:CCmCCmCm mo :mm:mmmm::�■■' EmE a ' ■m. ■■.. ■■■■■■■ON■■■EN■E■■■■rt"o"Noomoomo'■CIIoJ■�I:mommmllmm'■■'ommmmWm:.momommmm:M�mmmmommommCM ■■■■■■■.■N■■■■u■■■ EE■ E E■NmN■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■CEO■■■!■■■■■E■"!""�"'omim�■CCiClx-icimmmmC� so ■■C■.■N■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�.■■■■o�■■■.■■N■■■■■■N�■O■ -M MCN■ ■■■N■■■■■■N■■■■N■O■ONO■■■■is■.O■.■■■n■►■■■■■■■■■n■■■.■z.■■i�,N■■E■■■.■■■■.nNN�iN■..a■.■■■ E ■ r ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■E■E■■■E■,■""u"MMMMM l;'■nor'.%M owCCCiimmmmr3liE`.im mom. ..■. .Cm■■■E.O■O■N..........R,.■........ h■■■. ■■■■■■N.■N■N■■■■■■.ann■■■■■■■■■■.■ta■n■�a��■■■■■n■n■■■■■■i�+r�■■N■N■.N■■•�nmmCCCCCi�iCiC n i■.■■i�■■N■■■■■N MEMO N■■■ ■■�Oa�■N■te■■E■■■■E:�.n■N�.■■■■EO>tN■NON■■N►�r.■N■■N■N.■Ns. ca■■■■■.■■■ENEN■MOON N.■■m■■r�■■■■ENO■■■N■■sa■■■Ea■■■■E■a■.■■■■N■.GN.■E■O■■■■ma�■■N.■■.NCm■s ":'::m'mmmmmmmmmiimmmO�'ILMmom: Cmmm.�Cmu■ui■imimmmamiimmmmmmiiimmmmmimmmC■�mCmiiC�::u . m ..nm■■■■■■.■■..•::'m m::::m:m0000moC :m:m MMON::mmm:::::mmm=::::::::.� :::_�m::m�: 0 ON ME■ E■■■■■OMEN■■■ ■E�'"""'CCMENEM CimmNEESE 'i■'YooCCmmmmu'i■mmC'C'mo:l� o' �■ mmomomE • C, ■ ■■■■■NEON■■C►■tr OMEN■■N E■NE�E■■N�■H E mm�.S■m■■■■■ENNENNriR■ ■■.■NO■.■mom■r:,■.Nr�NN■■.■■■OCiCmOCCC�eiCmmmCECCCm�C�NNN ■ a ■■ - T 9 ■ ■N En■■■■��.■■r,.■HMO■■N■�n■■N■■■■■ns�■�+■■MENNENN■n EIN URN E "'•mmommmmmmmm'■mmmmmmmCmmmm0000'■'mmom mo'■mommmmomoom' '�EEE EMmE L''1M ■ ■ �C■�i CN■a ■■■■E_ ■■■n■■.■■■■Nn■■nN■ON■■■■■■ ■■ ■■ C ■■N■■N■■E.�' MEC C.. .E...��C M ■C■■EmN■NN f/■■■■■n000��.;omoomom'RiClRlml'IDmm111 MsimCEiC■ �■CC'CC'CCC'iAmMC'io m.■EN■■.N■■NC■■■■■■r■ .■■.O■■ ■ ►,■ Nm■■o■EE■�r �■m • •••• •■••••••mC:CmmCC:lCmmC�::mmm;on NomoN■■�■■.'m .� .m■■■ .... �m E • Em.. .m. ■.............1�.■.. .....�.... ,:m. . . . m ..�..M........ m Em . mmEBm EEE C.m.C=...... R■.■.■■........>....■..�.. .....■..E�� ... . ■NmCEC C■■■■■■■■'�Iyw■■■E■■w=■N■Alm Cmom m■■■N■WEVIONS �'■E�"C■'�`•,; C■mm ■CEC, '! . Em: mmmmmm�lNoomml;■:EN:o.l�CComom i mmom■mm. CCm Ca . E............■„N■.E..�m■.....E�. ....�, .. ....me,.... ... ... m..m... C m C m IN �1m .�mmEEm.EE �E C mm ■M ,E EM ■sN ■mN■■Nm muse muse meows sC.fatCCCN�IN■Nw■ N■■C■N■■pNp�N� C YC■■ =��p ■ nC\,muMCC■NNE■muCs N N■%,IrNJC1�■f N■M�I■N/�NIIM = • N■■.■■■N.N■■qC.�'N C'/i�Ci��jC,'viCtr��Ci�i'�'1'■ /■■Nat■■/■N■/■N■■ muse■■■NM■wasom�,■p�..•,■ muse�MmoinN om mNNs■Nm■N■mllboil on .1 WOOL • so ■Nan N■■■i■ • ■ IMEMO MPJN:1■■a�/■msese L.:L_� ,muse■■■ ■ C • t■■liiir■■■■■omanOsamu anN mN ■N■■■ m■ ■ /■m�i■Ns/,mNNm■a■■ ■Npmmmmla■■mN■aNm muse ■/1►.�■■■Nmm//■■N ■■■N .. ■t.MN■■t/C■CN�o■■ 081018Me■■sM�Na■■ must �,■ t■ �C�_ Ell /�iN/muN■■■muNm/NN muse■ • a11NsaNm/■Mmumu=Nmua mass mN t■N/ 11'�mmma�smamM� ■mmN Nsm mCCCCCmC■■�11 l CC /,semu■/■Ntmu/■se■/ ■■mumFNN mms■m■ ■ /■ ■ • I�i/m■/a■Nmsm■NV No muse■■■/ ■ ■ musem • !:• wassu�mnmmmmmm •'�i:::�:.":..".:•'�•".L::_y�� .........iI ■ MPI �'����C C CC C CCCCCCCCCC 1/rr�_h'•.'=:�Yi::mriiN■/I _rl■ S:iiscasemum i ■ El IF>r���1pmT.//JOI.Pe•�►�O/.:.' ir.rlm,■�m■■fs �■■N se am ■ ■ I �lLYN■N••Y01/YW3LCYL CCCCCCCCCCCCNmise'amamma m■m■al m■sniummo mm■ . emus in manomw::Nm comma■■aa/amm Nm.ar:-. /muse■■/■■M■■■mam•c� .•.• content assesses we muss■■cow■■wlc'-- �7i! ®® 1 swamp,W7.2 �r.sg?:Jlmssts ■■ ase Water content f+�tiA N NNC 1 • 1 CCCpsMolose■ weem ssos o 1 1 1 ■om■■aN■mu/a■mumu/mu■■■ '-Yl-nal back-pre sure. T Water content Void ratio 1 L Time to failure, min ®®®®.� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Type Of specimen Undisturbed Remarks Test • 3: Tan, mois Project EAST SIDE sand.very firm silty • • Test • moist, = sandy silt. 1 , Depth 5.0 7.0 1 Date 13 April 1981 . 1TRI&XIAL COMPRESSIONREPORT WATERSHED _,._._-_. . "- East Side Green River OWNER STATE iVA LOCATION King County PROJECT: LOGGED BY John A. Wilson DAT61/16/81 WP-07 WP-08 X FP-03 P.L.-46 LOCATION OF HOLES p-1 Channel DRILLING EQUIPNTl Track Mounted t5 bb U SAMPLES HOLE STA. & DEPTH S TYPE 2 3 DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS N C BIT NO. TYPE FROM TO CSE. REM. R 96 HOLE SURFACE FROM TO —�IN. NO. ELEVATION FT. FT. S USED F T. I FT. % DIAM. M BLW /FT 402 7, ,V 0 5.5 Silt, brn. , soft org. L S 5 5.5 ( 2 5.526.E Sand, F-M, loose, brn-dk. gry. few p .5 16.0 S. gravels, M-C @ 10 Ft. , few layers of I .0 6.5 6 F. sds @ 11.0 Ft. , silty sand layers 0 (10. 2 @ 26.0 Ft. , W.T. @ 8.0 Ft. TD-26.5 Ft. 1. 11. 3 15 15. 3 5. 16 I 6.d1.6. 9 O.d20. 3 0. 21 1 21. 9 I 5 25. 4 5.926. 5 I Ll I 26 126. 9 3. PERCENT SAMPLE RECOVERY SHEET 2 OF SHEETS 1. DISTURBED-UNDISTURBED-ROCK CORE 2. COARSE MATERIAL REMOVED AOL U.S. STANDAW SIEVE 0;r7,7Z, iI'.L Ii:IrHi-z--- U.S. 3TAkZAW WINE NIJMZa Z4 NY6::OR�iicG 6 4 3 2 11� 1 �4 Si ii 3 A b 6 10 1416 20 30 40 50 70 100 1-40 260 0 1 rm 90 10 !0 'sib 30 a- 70 x 3 60 \ 40 0 � W �+ 30 50 < Z O s u I u 40 60 u 30 70 60 10 90 0 1 0.5 0.1 0.05 0.01 0.005 0.00010 SOO 100 SO 10 5 GRAIN SIZE MILLIMETERS COMES GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY COARSE FINE COARSE tittD1UM FINE SAMPLE NO. My OR DEPTH "SWICATION NAT W% u FL M PROIKT EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER 1 15.0-16.5 SAND (SP) 2 25.0-26. 5 SAND (SP) Kin Count Washington AREA "LNG NO. TH-102 GRADATK)N CURVES NPD DATE 16 March 1981 81—S-293 Y.�.tovlurtrt rartlr�41I1G{.. MJ OI-7N- N ENG CORM 2087 RLA E► Cti wE5 Foam No. 1241,St► 1962,WHICH 1:Oi3OLM. I MAY 6 ""�r SERVICE ON LOG ST HOLES REV.3-67_ SOIL 1- VA , WATERSFiM.__,-' A� SUB-WATERSHED SITE NO. East Side Green River LOCATION OWNER STATE WA � King County LOGGED BY DATE PROJECT: John A. Wilson X 1/16/81 WP•07 WP-08 FP-03 P.L.-46 DRILLING EQUW. 6TTTrack Mounted LOCATION OF HOLES p-1 Channel HOLE U SAMPLES STA. & DEPTH S TYPE 2 3 HOLE SURFACE FROM TO DESCRIPTION OF MATERIALS 1 FROM TO CSE. REM. REC. N C BIT NO. TYPE MIN. % NO. ELEVATION FT. FT. S USED FT. FT. `% DIAM. 0 BL /F . S� r 0 5 15.5 1 5�5i12 Silt, non plastic, org. soft 11 1 5.516.0 1 I S 6.0 6.5 1 12121. 1 Sand, VF, dk gry. F-M , W.T. @*12.5' P Loose TD-21 .5 Ft. 10 }11 . 1 * W.T. raised to 6.5 in. 1 hr. 115 116. � 1/ 1II 16.J16. 3 20 120. 20.521. 4 0 404 ,1,5,q1e67 0 2.5 Silt non plastic, solft brn. L 21.021 . 15 M S 2.51 8 Silt, v. sdy, F. loose, brn. , strat. L H 51 7. S E - 8I 20 Sand, V-M, poorly graded, dk. gry. P L I B 3.514.0 2 W.T. @ 8.0' Y .0 4.5 12 4.5 15.0 3 TD-20.0 Ft. 110.Q10. 3 111. 11 . 4 1- 15 15. 3 I 15 .416. 6 16.916. I12 1. DISTURBED-UNDISTURBED-ROCK CORE 2. COARSE MATERIAL REMOVED 3. PERCENT SAMPLE RECOVERY SHEET 3 OF SHEETS -- U.S. SWIDAW SIEVE CPr`Y,iii:l; W, it 4016 U.S. ST..RSC`,kk0 SIEVE NU&Q4 iL;S liY�::�`S>1EIti1t -- 100 a 4 3 2_1'i4 1"4 4 3 4 a d 10 ld 16 20 40 SO 7'0 100 1-40 'dad 0 90 -- 10 i0 24 1 70 30 i 40 .ao 0 W W 50 50 Z 0 40 60 7:T 30 70 eo 20 i 10 90 0 \, . 100 Soo 100 SO 10 5 1 0.5 0.1 0.05 0.01 0.005 0.001 GRAIN SIZE MILLII IFTERS GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY CO6iLES COARSE fI/Jf COARSE MEDIUM FINE SAMPLE NO. ELIV Oft NPTH CLASSIPICATK)#4 HAT W% u n M ,,,afcr EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER �. 1 8.0 - 9. 5 Si. SAND (SP-SM) King County, Washington AAfA "*4G No. TH 404 GRADATION CURVES NPD DATE 16 March 1981 (81-S-293) Y.{.{pY[■11�[M1 NI�T111{pII1C[.1{{i 0/-7N•1i{ ENG ft�i1M 2087 RERACES HIES FORM NO. 1241. SIP 1962,WHICH I$OiSOLM. 1 MAY 03 EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER y; King County, Washington : Sample No. TH-A4 Depth, ft 5.0 - 7.8 "R" Triaxial Back Prssure & Pore Pressure Test Data 7/ � 000 L ; 20 i i 17— R r t t 'ten c womiM■n■M/tYCls 1LmsmN`,'IN�rY.T. 1■M� �N/N� ■//M•Nen NN■�■�■ • /■t/•M`ttit■/■/■�p� �p NMa/t■/�/�■■/Mmm■■MOR �N■%/•iM�on1�I/•/��II!/MMl��■/NN ■ mN/aaNN11lrl.■■ MtiitM/i I•aF/■NIt■M ■■/MMMt■M■■rM•/ tMNNtlt■tNNM�t/N■■ ■/aN•MMsrral•»no�uw /snow tN■ ■/ e■ M • NN■M/N�wC�JwiiL'/V�) : trr■tt■/tltMNt�/t sm■■tO�i■■N■monsoon rNNinn�e■N■■ N■ • ■ss/'•� =eMn■■■ ■• ■■■msNmmYt/Mt/•N■N ■ ■a/ra■/■/■■■//a■■=■■ ■nNIS 11 s� ��H/// � s■/1■M■st■mmsmm■■N amaaNN■ N ■as•AaeNpt/at=Monson am owomNMasmmnmamNs now m EMtiiMiii�siiii•i mm���Nmlz mMm �' orj Rime■ om"n a•e'!M •■/ i ■,mmtmNMtm■/mtMm,7 a"mmNpso ■V.� nneme/nrs��■■'iiiem■e■ mom/•• onih ■■ ■ ■ MEN Mae Ilaa•et1Y•wdi•/Nanent mmsans■ %MFAEs■ ■ aa■ fi� Ry J ONE � Cfin OU'Somm"m AI%%�\/■■:i 11111 /1 M a nnNa■name Callat�'am■1���f=■■/t�=■��� � �■a����� � :.sansma■ams man sNunn �aaaa■■a■aa■a■a■■■a � ■wnattm//a■/■/aaaNm i=i�iiiniiii■iiiii�i= Test No. ©_ ems0:00:88C Void ratio /mat/1,■/emame an umoMwMM2 water Content 11100128 ■■N/N�n!/'-rlla./lM:�► �® 1 1 1 • : _ as Suftwo mnmy rm+mmmasmanmmmn ♦ • ao■§11/a■ ■aNmNaYa■ e■aM■pnenn■MaalYo • emmp emnemmape napm '' 1 1 11 1 1 • . � a®® ft Water content 0■®®®■■ 1 . or. ft Rate of � • . _ Time to failure, min • � rain,•- stress, TWI Initial diameter, i 1 1 1 1 1 1 , Ult deviator ■ .. . . R-narks Test No. I—Light +e■m� . . �■■■ �■■■■■■ brown EAST SIDE damp, soft clean sand. King C unty, Washington Test ►• g• -moist, soft, silty sand. Boring No. LH- 1 4 ■ Depth .,,,. 5.0 . April 1981 ./ TRIAXLkL COMPRESSIONa. REPORT ' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION FOR P-1 CHANNEL - SR405 BOX CULVERT ' RENTON, WASHINGTON ' Job No. 8638ABKJ ' July 17, 1986 Prepared for Andersen, Bjornstad, Kane, Jacobs, Inc. 220 W. Harrison St. Seattle, Washington 98119 t 1 HONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 206-743-4774 R 3 ] � z SR405 ° y PLAN MAP w a � � RENTON BOX z r CULVERT w $1p• 5 o A53Y 16 16 20 24 22 518 i� 14 18 LEGEND (j TH-1 THIS INVESTIGATI( 90p• TP- TH-TEST BORIC 1 00 148 ® TP-TEST PIT z .�— PREVIOUS ? INVESTIGATION > w o W H-TEST BORING 6 w 12 SR405 STN.147+67.69 25005'22' R-I STN. 6 \ 0 PREPARED BY 14 I 8 HONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. \ TP-I ,, 1 12 O* CI,P-1 TH-2 11 f SCALE 1'-20' TEST PILE N2 H-2 ! \ 10 H-4 00 SP�f NCBROOg S4�V�C1105 FIGURE 1 CR4k i �: rt -r-» r[ 'z!.t"1"'.F _ T ;' "•'f„ +aRv,,4'f("';rstrls'.: :f-{;'.+e rrr+P.s7.:r,,.. ..� • y i �� �h it � ,u' Y _ - \ �„ v'- SY`•"�.' i` _T.., y�'.',-`'p� �'+.t£+, i':iy ...$.., N S w w ELEVATION ELEVATION IN FEET Y Y IN FEET SMOf 30 4 30 i OUTLINE OF PROPOSED 20 PIT RUN SAND AND GRAVEL flll BOX CULVERT Tp N1 TP-T ci•ri[w1rN N-T TP-1 TH-3 TEST PILE♦T TN-1 T . Wnt[0.1.tanw a�S�Rw[t.e[.raa --a-Re °«Mll GLL♦ Lpm(3Y 3aOwM, uC°ORa OYila •.Me.OTTa[. ywae 3 T { 10 Iooa[To•[0.eWC a� 0- • WHO 1.c..rai rR LOOSE.RUST BROWN.SILTY SAND I uoTn'Y'u{n s•n. 10 uq n r.ro 3 iT T 1] rorT[fR i io�rcl w ui' 9 iva i.u° ao.rL T���T f loon[To m swi 11 or oac•..c Guru 11 o aat^,a•T M.DENSE GRAY SAND WITH GRAVCl I.Tocuwe loos eca•r. ma sunCc�•r _ 1`,*a . umail[r �Cr°� [wt �i.GurY y WATER LEVEL Q _ r.Torf.un I c[• ma Yi.curaL •.•.t r.cuvu csus... ca.r.r. t ....,..». iT • ......� I.GYVY �•.�..... a / !0 _ 7 S:Nn i�To c1 tf u[n.n[nsC eio•� --_ T wn.n aao. uci Nan, 11 20 T T C a[MC aC iiA-1.V 1. m a[w•C it ua riv iO c t•nC.00° cca.r 4 mC T T rYtp�A Il /.TOC{.aa,iR.a r T { T if v.InG3C tc cur. I.G[•vY 15 T �► mrr s•�w W.a nauC 7 -!0 4° 7 T C / -10 caAl.i.�.aCa i..a. {{ 7 1{ ,Ts;YrNaa.r V.LOOOSE SR(.ANIC,SILT SAAO I{►f LENSES O/ ss m.[aoC OC ro.•"iii.ui 4 r u T TRRRRRM Tci711, )2 7 36 aaeua.aC cur w oo.tc�a•r.mry r.roc Yna, rnRi ca..0 _Tp {oan cuvu -TO TS /S Sl f V.DENSE.GRAY SAND AND GRAVEL WLaL cur 30 WLGci•, n, 69 l.ao6C Ga•rvirR io*Yaa, TS r.curu /S i.Trovtcuru a•wa ca•ru M -TO tT auet -I G[Ar ca•r,iun.I.TR uan l..A.a if cYuar r.curtY EE I.ro C Gau4•n T • 36 100 100 K BEARING.TONS /7 w Ill ca•r �0 r.To c iuv�y° so ' Sr it nn r.ci.rY {7 t0 -50 BOREHOLELEGEND 'S0 . r mna•w SO STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE.BLOWS/FOOT SOIL DESCRIPTION p 10 TO w SO PENETRATION INTERVAL 10 F[!T gENTON BOX CULVERT-I/Uf -f0 1 SOIL PROFILE ' NONO CONSULTING ENGINE[R3,INC.. —"'—'—'— Figure BOREHOLE LOG � GROUND MOISTURE CONTENT•/, 9 DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION a. WATER sPT RESISTANCE e (feet) a CONDITION vs 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Very dense, gray, medium to 36 coarse sand, some fine to coarse 14 gravel , trace of silt in lenses 38 15 40 I 16 42 17 44 46 Very dense, gray, fine to coarse sand, some fine to coarse gravel , • 48 trace wood debris 8 50 52 19 54 56 Very dense, gray, medium to 20 58 coarse sand and fine gravel 60 END OF HOLE PROJECT DATE 6-12-86 HOLE NO. RENTON BOX CULVERT LOGGED BY SHE TH - 1 l' Figure 3a A.B.K.J. 220 W. HARRISON ST. ELEVATION 15' SHEET SEATTLE, WA. 98119 DEPTH 58.5' 2 of 2 IBOREHOLE LOG ( 1 a GROUND MOISTURE CONTENT 0 DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION WATER (feet) x SPT RESISTANCE A N CONDITION IO 20 30 40 so 60 70 Very loose, red brown, mottled silty sand 2 • (native material ) 1 4 6 2 g Loose to medium dense, gray, 3 fine to coarse sand, little 10 fine gravel ' � - 4 — 12 14 — 16 b Medium ense, dark gray, 18 fine to coarse sand 7 20 Very loose to loose, dark gray, Aw 22 fine silty sand with lenses of I wood and peaty material F1 1 24 Medium dense to dense, dark gray 1 26 fine to coarse sand, some fine 1 to coarse gravel 28 11 Note: No recover 30 Ll 32 34 PROJECT DATE 6-12-86 HOLE NO. RENTON BOX CULVERT LOGGED BY SHE TH-1 Figure 3 A.B.K.J. 220 W. Harrison St. ELEVATION 15' SHEET Seattle, WA. 98119 DEPTH 58.5' 1 or 2 BOREHOLE LOG DEPTH a GROUND MOISTURE CONTENT % 0 ... SOIL DESCRIPTION R W T (feet) a WATER SPT RESISTANCE A CONDITION 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Loose, red brown , fine to 2 medium sand 4 1 6 2 8 Medium dense, gray, fine to coarse sand and fine gravel 3 10 4 12 14 5 - 16 6 ap Medium dense, dark gray, 18 fine to medium sand 7 20 END OF HOLE i 1 PROJECT DATE HOLE NO. RENTON BOX CULVERT LOGGED BY SHE TH-2 I� Figure 4 A.B.K.J. 220 W. HARRISON ST. ELEVATION 14' SHEET DEPTH 19' 1 of 1 HONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. .;✓) • GeotvchnkmJ Englrmwing • Mt*rW Testing • Conanxikxt Quoky Control inspection • GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION project:.......Renton Box Culvert .........-• Test Hole Number:..TH,-.1.p..S-4 . ............... ........................... ...................................................-......................................................... Depth:........1 ............................................................. .. :. Project Number..._........8638-......I. Sample Description .............................. Date Tested:.........6/24/86.............................................I.......... Gravel:........71....... Remarks: D15....-...0.12... mm_.. _..................... ............ Sand .....87. ... .. 85 2. .......... Silt ..... ......6 D = 10 MM .100 ........ ..........._ ......................................... Clay:.._ _. ..... . .. . .............__ ._ ........................... ... ' CLAY SILT I AND GRAVEL FINE I MEDIUM I CRSE I FINE COARSE SIEVE SIZES 100 200 100 60 4030 20 16 108 4 ag '-2 3-4 1 1'-2 2 3 90 80 .. .... Cr 70 W J C 60 _ ... ....... .. .. 50 _:, ... . ....... ....... Z W U0 ...... ... ....... ....... .. ....................... cc a .... .4...y. O - 0 _ .0005 .001 .002 .005 .01 .02 .05 .1 .2 .5 1 2 5 10 20 50 GRAIN SIZE-MILLIMETRES Reviewed By: ..........5-HE........................................ I� All tests performed in accordance with ASTM IFIGURE 9 ' HONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. • Geotechnlcal Engineering • Material Testing is Corwructlon Quajky Control Inspection • } GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Renton Box Culvert TH-1, S-4 Project:...... .. _. ........._.............................I Test Hole Number: ............................................................................................................... Depth;...........12 ..............................................................:.................. in Project Number ..........8638 ....... .............."...."........ Sample Description Date Tested:.....................6/24/86. .......:..._.... ..............._ ....................... Gravel:- 37 % ............ Remarks D15 ...0.25.......mm _ . __. _ . __ _........... Sand:-....61 ....... _ D85... Silt ............2 ..._ .2 0 D = 18 rim_...........100 ...... _ ................................. Clay... .............. CLAY SILT SAND T GRAVEL FINE MEDIUM CRSE I COARSE I SIEVE SIZES 100 200 100 60 4030 20 16 108 4 3-4 1 1'-2 2 3 90 80 Cr 70 _ ..... ... . W J J Q 60 50 __ ...................' ............ .. ....... . Z W U40 ........... .."..:.,..�:.:...:. .... :. W .. ....".. .. ............ .... .... ........ ...... .. .. t1 30 20 _.:..... . .... 10 ...._.....,..;............:.. ..__.........;.,.................... . .... O 0005 .001 002 .005 .01 02 .05 .1 .2 .5 1 2 5 10 20 50 GRAIN SIZE-MILLIMETRES Reviewed By _ ................................... All tests performed in accordance with ASTM FIGURE 10 HONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 9 Cmeote6rdcoil Engineering * Material T*3tlN * Construcuon Quality Control Irtapectlon • GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Renton Box Culvert TH-1, S-6 Project:...........I................................................................................. Test Hole Number:..............1.............. ....... ........ , Depth:. .....15 ........... 1-1-11-................ ....... ............ ............. .............. ............. ......-.... 8638 Project Number!.............................................................................. Sample Description 6/24/86 DateTested:..................... .. ............ ......... ............................ Gravel. ...... .............. D - 0.23 m Remarks; . .. .........15..................... ... .. ....................... ... .. ... Sand:. .99 �........... ....0,8.......I....MM.................. .......... silt: -.......I I...... D 5.0 mm ........ ....... .. ...... Clay! - AVEL CLAY SILT FINE I SAN �p MEDIUM I CR E I FINE COARSE SIEVE SIZES 100 200 100 60 4030 20 16 108 4 ag '-2 3% 1 1-2 2 3 90 ... . ... ................ ........ ....... 80 ................ .... .. ......... .. . ........... ....... . ........................... ...... . cr 70 ..... .... ........... ...... ................ .. .... ....... ................... .............. .. .... .. ..... LLJ <_J 60 ..... .....­­­-.1. ..... . ...... ...... ........ ­1.................... ............ 50 ............................. ........ .......I.. ..... ..... .................. ..................... ....... ...... z LLJ ...........*.......... ...... .......... ................... 40 ... ...... ........... ......... CC LIJ ............................................... .......... 30 ....... ...... .................. ............................ ..... 20 ... ..................... .............. .. .......... .......... ......... ........ --- .................... ........ 10 ...................... ....... ...... . ........ . ............. ...... 0 DDO 5 001 .002 .005 '01 .02 -05 .1 .2 .5 1 2 5 10 20 50 GRAIN SIZE-MILLIMETRES Reviewed By: . .....5tta.......... ............. All tests performed in accordance with ASTM FIGURE 12 ' HONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. O " C ; • GeotechnicoJ Engineering • MatwW Ttasting * Conatruction Quality Control Inspection • GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION f Renton Box Culvert TH-1, S-9 Project .............................................. Test Hole Number.............:...................... ....................... .. .................................. ......................................................................... Depth:..........22.5.'........................... .......................................... . Project Number: . 8638 ...... ............................................. Sample Description 6/27/86 DateTested: _................. ......... .__ ................... ....................... Gravel.........._ . ....... Remarks . ... ....... . ........... . ... .......................... Sands.......76 %! _ D15.. .....0 05..._...MM .__..... ................................ Silt: ....... .24 ro D = 0.25 MM . . ..85.. .. ........ .... Clay..... D100 0.45 MM ............... ...... ND I CLAY SILT FINE AM MEDIUM CRSE FINE RAV COARSE SIEVE SIZES 100 200 100 60 40 30 20 16 108 4 3% 1 1'-2 2 3 90 I80 CC 70 W Q 60 i/) 50 _ .. . ....... _. ... W U 40 _. ............... .......... W d 30 :..;.;. .... ._.. ........ ... 20 . : .....:.....a....s........ ...........:....:,. 10 0 r .0005 .001 .002 .005 .01 .02 .05 .1 .2 .5 t 2 5 10 20 50 GRAIN SIZE-MILLIMETRES Reviewed By: .....1­1­ 82F................ All tests performed in accordance with ASTM FIGURE 16 DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS ...........:.......:...:.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .:. .:. .:. . :. .:. i ......:�..:.........»............ t - i t . (n ..... Z N . . . Q . Q W _ T-7.. ` . 1000 .......:.......:...»..:......................._.....»« :..... ._.. »...: . i . ' . . . ... ..x_gQ.. . : ' : :' ': 0 1000 2000 NORMAL STRESS IN PSF TEST HOLE DEPTH WATER 'DRY PCF) NORMAL No. N0, (FT) CONTENT% �DENSITY PRE SURE STRESS SF STRESS CLASSIFICATION PSF SOIL T-7 TH-1 10 1625 1125.6 sandy silt T-8 TH-1 10 368 328.0 it T-9 TH-1 12 1311 791.1 to T-10 TH-1 12 683 495.3 " I - - - T HONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS FTCTIRR 37 i DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS _.. .............................. ... ... .:. ... ... _ -'- . 21000 ........:......:_....:........_...:......: : : ' " : . a . . . . . _.. N . LLI . . . ................'................... ..._.. . . . _ : : : : : : : : : : : : : �T_1 : : : _ : : : : :.i.: : : : : : . : . : . . :. _.._......__.._..................._._.... : . : . : : : : : .V : ........... : : : : : . . Q . . . : -..T4 6 : : : --_ . : : : : ................ . ... ... . ... .. .. . _.. . :.:.:.:. ...... ... : : : . : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ;. _. 3 • '• : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :' ': : : : :'I':' : : . ... ... ... ... . ' '_' ' 0 1000 2000 NORMAL STRESS IN PSF 1 TEST HOLE DEPTH WATER DRY (PCF) NORMAL PS YIELD PS PEA F K P SF SOIL No. NO. (FT) CONTENT%DENSITY PRESSURE STRESS STRESS CLASSIFICATION T-1 TH-1 24.5 2096 1125.6 silty sand with organics T-2 TH-1 22.5 2096 1331.3 " ( T-3 TH-1 24.5 2096 1331.3 " T-4 24.5 997 720.4 " T-5 TH-1 23.5 1468 913.3 " 06 TH-1 23.5 525 385.9 " HONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS FIGURE 38 BOREHOLE LOG �y DEPTH -j GROUND MOISTURE CONTENT % (feet) SOIL DESCRIPTION a WATER g SPT RESISTANCE A 0 CONDITION ID 20 10 ao 50 Fo 70 Loose, red brown , fine to 2 medium sand 4 1 • 6 2 Medium dense, gray, fine to 8 coarse sand and fine gravel 3 10 4 12 5 14 �• 166 Medium dense, dark gray, 18 fine to medium sand 7 20 END OF HOLE PROJECT DATE MOLE NO. RENTON BOX CULVERT LOGGED BY SHE Figure 4 A.B.K.J. 220 W. HARRISON ST. TH-2 E L E NATION 141 SHEET DEPTH ' 19, 1 of 1 I , HONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. • Geotechnkd Engineering RlatsrloJ Tooting • Conatrtxtlon QudRy Control Inspection • GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project......Renton Box Culvert .................. ......... Test Hole Number:....TH-2.,....5-4 .................................................................................................... Depth:........!P"....-- 11.5................................................................ Project Number:....I.....8638.....11. . Sample Description Date Tested: ......6/25/86............ . . ..... __...... ..... .. Gravel: ....28......%....... Remarks: _D1S_. ......�4._ . rr>m Sand ....70 %........ rryrn ........... __.... _......D85... ...7. ...... . ... . ..... .......... .. ....__... Silt: ..........2... p...... MM _. .... ..D.100 20....... .................................. ..... Clay:................ CLAY SILT AND GRAVEL FINE I MEDIUM I CRSE I FINE I COARSE SIEVE SIZES <a 100 200 100 60 4030 20 16 108 4 t� 34 1 11 2 2 3 90 :. ....... _._.:. .................>. __. 80 Q70 _.. ..... ....... .... ... ..... .. _. . ... W J Q60 ;. .. . . .: .._......•y...........L................... .. .. ........ .. ... lA 50 ;......:. _ ._..... . Z W a 30 ....... ... .. 20 .... 10 .... ..... ....... ... • 0 .0005 .opt 002 .005 .01 .02 OS 1 .2 .5 1 2 5 10 20 50 GRAIN SIZE-MILLIMETRES Reviewed By: ........ .................................. All tests performed in accordance with ASTM FIGURE 30 HONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. • GsotechrllccJ EngIrAwIN • Materlol Testing • Construction Quollty Control Inapectlon • GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Renton Box Culvert Project ............................................................................................... Test Hole Number...TH-2 S-6 ................................................. i ................................................................................................ Depth...15.0.'....'...16.5�.......................................................... Project Number_._._ .8638.......... .. .. ..... . ............................ Sample Description Date Tested: .... 6/23/86 -...... ._....I... Gravel _ _..34. % .. D = 0.6 mm ......... . Remarks D15 .......lo......... .... _ .................... . .. Sand ........64 %...._ 85 mm .............. _ .. .. _ .. ......... .. ...... Silt: ...... .....2 % D100= 20 mm _._ . ... Clay................... CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL I "'" I FINE I MEDIUM 1, CRSE I FINE I COARSE SIEVE SIZES 100 200 100 60 4030 20 16 108 4 1'12 2 3 90 _ __..: 1 80 . ...... ... . C 70 W ccQ60 .. .. .:.. .. .. .-. ... .. .... ....... ... . Vl 50 ....... .. ......... .. .. ......:......:.....:... Z W 40 ....... ...... .....n..... .... ....... ....... .. .. CC ..d.. i W d 30 20 ...... .. ....... ....... .. 10 _ _ 0 .0005 .001 002 .005 .01 .02 .05 .1 .2 .5 1 2 5 10 20 50 GRAIN SIZE-MILLIMETRES 1 , Reviewed By $1.7 e....................................... . All tests performed in accordance with ASTM FIGURE 31 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT I OAKESDALE AVENUE Submitted to THE CITY OF RENTON Prepared by CH2M HILL Bellevue, Washington September 1987 N N ' r� I , t •n Fri STD' I IMto it � f ,,`•�,Xy� A"r �q�s s �"` * ��' � ��.T' .r ���': � way,• -.t'1�` _ _ _ � �� �A , ; °:s,a� `p F ��'�`(���.y shy " fTa a�` �` t •i oo 0 ^ � _ R w���-� ,��" �i�• �� � i�Sr,D � .'t�i�a fir. Y t k Iwo ♦r s r � i1,'a� ���,. ..� ry £ate "� •�,g,,;yf�-R V � .,'k �S':�.Rzi'�.. a � ��•,� A .k, k•. .%' �.•. � R .r�. ``•� 3. �`' A. , .� '"' R �� �I""' J � . :;$ „ , �';°r� '� kr. ,,fir. . . . y1 ,. r •., ;� �_ i�' 'y.,� , �� '� ",��.►x}` , � �.� ,�„ ,�to,�y ;��:f.: a� R .+- ;ii a, .�4• af» +a° �{"� �,. *'� iY�'" .�".+ ='°il aty r , • t .:w.' '�"�.•+!a�F,iC .i) ";�, €' ;:r : ., �� .� R• :r �a < lsry � � 1. •"• `'s. �y7." '�.ry`` t: �i�.p',-i f�� r ,'i„�" �, ;✓. '$k:, ;nj: -r y,.�`• +� ,,��;�` a�: 'K����g ' '`,�(' r,'6�.1 �.t �.$•x9 A?"�,�, �;t 3 ,�•# Y r (fie i A+ k r R i t •- Aj�i �' "� .�3 �" .y.,. :� +C 4a yam,{{' � •�' Y^gts,1"7 ;'}{ IJ 1 y t..r....t.....L.:.:c...r.,, .... ...x..t..x.,..am r...;t.a._a...e. .t`_s....a. a..'.x. `' !._ ..w..,�#''._�"—..e. L..L.1.•_.t_: r... � M :�:/' PA.i .,4 .Rd a6r,z LO I-405 ... ri ED to co a� �.� .. ,...... .. ..:'o.<..... .,. ,..,..,.�...•,c,..a..<.ro.:�4�tr'%fR"i°'Aw ...<:Wn'r....r», aR..q:e • . • ��O t �, .�•r.rw..ry .V v^.�..N^•r.•w•v^1"••rw r�.'r•rrr � � f���.< � "•�"+ra s`.t 'b., `"i�A ",At'R�x �R �y W Y' •ti �0 � kip,-,f 1A6�.kJnf'R. S t'��*^ "Sl •�i •."� N. • � �\ r �a ,�'.,�1',a+� "tr ra �.` � aCk.�� e ale: >,...� ' ZHwy �' VJ �`" S'� ,;r• � 8 r/ � ,fit �' i NOTE: LEGEND. The depth and thickness of the subsurface strata indicated on the section (profile) were GRAVEL WITH SILT AND SAND, VERY WELL GRADED TO POORLY GRADED and interpolated between test borings. Information on actual subsurface DENSE, PIT RUN FILL SAND WITH SCATTERED GRAVEL generalized from a DENSE TO VERY DENSE. conditions exists only at the specific locations and dates indicated. Soil (rock) conditions and NON-ENGINEERED FILL WITH water levels at other locations may differ from conditions occurring at the boring locations. CONCRETE RUBBLE. B-1(1 5'W) BORING NUMBER W/OFFSET FROM Also, the passage of time may result in a change in the conditions at these boring locations. OAKESDALE AVE. CENTERLINE. GENERALLY SILTY SAND AND SILT, GEOLOGIC CONTACT. OCCASIONALLY SAND OR CLAY, MEDIUM STIFF AND LOOSE. WATER LEVEL OBSERVED DURING DRILLING. WELL GRADED TO POORLY GRADED GENERALIZED WATER LEVEL 7-21-87. SAND, WITH SCATTERED GRAVEL AND OCCASIONAL THIN SILT AND PEAT. MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE—. /&"Lao .... ... .................... ........ ........ ......... .............. .......... .......... .. .. ..... ... ..... ..... ......... 122 L'L L L L L LLLL L, LLLL L L L L,6 L L L L L L L LLL -�L LL L L L L L L, L'LL LL LLL L L L L . . . L L L L L L-L L L L L L L L L L I L L L L L L L L L L-L L L L L L LLL_LL'LLL -L L LLL'* L L L L�LLI. . . . LL� L L L L L L .L L L LLL L L L L 'L L L L L LLLL-LL L L L LLL L L L L L, L s L L L L L LLI'L'L'L L L L L LLL LL A LL L L L -L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L - L L LLLLk L L L LLLL L L L L LLLL LLL L LLLLLLLL� L L L L L LLLLLL L L L LLL' L 1, L LLL LL L L L L L -L L L -LL L L L L L LLL�, L L L,L L L L-L L L, L LLLL1L1,1L L LL L L L L L L L L L I L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L t L L 'L L'L L L L L L L'.LLL L L LLL L I U L L.L L L L L L L L L I L L L L L L L L L L L L L LL L L L L L L LL L L L LL _L LLL L L L L L LLLLL L L L L L.L L L L L L L L L LLLLL L LLLLLLL L L ' L L L L L LLL L L L L L. L L L, L L L . L& L� L L L L L L LLL L LL LL I. LLLLL LLL L _ L L L L L L ' L L L :LILL-LLLLLLLLLLLL LLL L L L L L L t.�'L L L , L L L L L,L LL L L I L LL.LLL L U L L1:0 L L L L LLL L L L L L I L LLL L L L L L L L L L LLL L L I L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L I L I L 0 L L L L. L L L L L L " L L L L L L L - . L L L L L -L L L L L '_LL LLL L L I I I I LLL L L L L L L L L, 1:e6 L L'_'LL' L,L LL :LL L L L L L L L LLL L, L L LL,.L, , L L LL L L L L , L L L I L L L L. LLLLLLL L L L L L L_ L L I L L I L L L L 1?L L -L_L L L L L :L, L L L L u LLL�L'L LL L L L L L L L L L L .L L ' ' ' L L L L�. LL L L L I LL L 6LL-LLLLLLLLLLLLLL_1LLLLL::� L L • A LL 'L L'UULLL�LL L L L LLLLLLLL - L L L L LL L 4 1 L L L L L L L L L' L L_L_ L I L L' L L L L L _ L L L L L ,LLLf- LLIL L L L L L L L. L L L L , L-L LLLLL L L L l,L,- L LLL L L L L ♦ L L L L L ' L L :LLLL L L L L L L L*:L L L L LLLLLLLLLLLL• L L LL L L L L L LLL L L L L L -LLLL"L L L �LLLL LLLLL,-LLLL-,LLLL L L L L L L L L L LLLL-LL'T'j '.L'L L L L L L L L L L LL'LLLL . L L L _ L L L L L I L L L L L'K L�se L L L L L L L L I L -LL LL-'11�j L L L -..% L L L L L,L L L L 6 L♦L L L LL L L L L L L L L L L�l LL L L L L L L L L LLL L LL L L L L LLL,.LLLLL'_�LLL_LLLLL L , , Lt. L�LLLLLL L L L L L L LLL' L &�ILL I L L L L L L L , '. L L.L -14,2 LL-'L-L'L% LL,-ILLLILI�CR-L L L L L. L L L L L LL L.1%,LLLL,L. L L L L L L L L L L L L t. L �LLLL '- LL-LLLLL1LLLLL L LLLLLLL L L L L�LLUIL�LL�LLLL 1,.LL 6 'L.Lph.L. L LL LLLLL LLL L L L L L L L LLL --LL L L . L L L I. L %�� L L L"L L . ' L L L L L L L L IL LLLLLL. LLLLL. L . L L -L LLL-,-,-,-LLL L'L'- L�LL L�ILL L L11%'.L L L L L L L LL LLLL IL.LLL,LLLLLL LLL L LLLLL L L - 6-4. L L L L'LLLLLL_LLL -'_1 L_1_LL,-, L L, , , L , LILL - L L LLL . . . LL LL.L,L.LLL L - - - - - - - - - - 7 M 42 r/_17 2 V_ owTA 7- _5 FIGURE 4 20 I SITE SUBSURFACE PROFILE OAKESDALE AVENUE _ jS21810.J1 Table 4 (( GRAIN-SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST RESULTS Moisture Boring Sample Sample ASTM Percent Percent Percent Content No. No. Depth Class. Gravel Sand Fines (percent) B1 S4 17.5-19.0 SM - - 21 33.4 Bl S5 22.5-24.0 SP-SM 3 91 6 22.4 B2 S5 22.5-24.0 SP 1 96 3 22.0 B2 S12 57.5-58.5 SM - - 18 18.1 B2 S15 72.5-73.8 SW-SM 38 55 7 13.5 B3 S1 5.5-7.0 GW-GM 57 35 8 6.4 B3 S5 23.0-24.5 SW-SM 39 56 5 9.6 B3 S7 33.0-34.5 ML 65 39.5 B3 S11 53.0-54.5 SP-SM 7 86 7 21.4 B4 S3 13.0-14.5 ML - - 73 31.5 B4 S15 68.0-69.5 GW-GM 52 41 7 7.6 B5 ST1 12.5-14.5 ML 0 4 96 51.9 B5 S4 17.5-19.0 SM 0 87 13 28.0 B6 S1 2.5-4.0 ML - - 52 34.3 B6 S3 12.5-14.0 SW to GW 49 49 2 11.1 B6 S5 22.5-24.0 SW 28 72 0 14.5 B7 S1 2.5-4.0 ML - - 81 29.6 B7 S3 12.5-14.0 SW 36 61 3 11.9 B7 S5 22.5-24.0 SW 16 82 2 16.3 B8 S1 2.5-4.0 SM 0 54 46 20.7 B8 S3 12.5-14.0 SW 39 59 2 10.0 B8 S4 17.5-19.0 SP 5 92 3 20.8 B9 S1 2.5-4.0 (SW-SM) 11 22.2 B9 S2 7.5-9.0 SP 3 95 2 24.1 B9 S3 12.5-14.0 SW 23 73 4 16.2 B9 S4 22.5-24.0 (SW) - - 6 12.3 B10 S1 2.5-4.0 (SM to ML) - - 50 29.2 B10 S2 7.5-9.0 SP-SM 15 80 5 21.8 B10 S3 12.5-14.0 SP 7 90 3 23.3 B10 S5 22.5-24.0 SM 0 62 38 34.2 Bll S1 7.5-9.0 CL 0 15 85 36.1 Bll S4 22.5-24.0 SP-SM 5 90 5 20.7 Bll S5 27.5-29.0 SP-SM - 92 8 19.7 B12 S1 2.5-4.0 SM - 28 21.7 _ B12 S2 7.5-9.0 SM 17 12.0 B12 S3 12.5-14.0 SP-SM 1 92 7 23.1 B12 S4 17.5-19.0 (SW) - - 4 12.5 B13 S1 2.5-4.0 SM - - 29 11.3 B13 S2 7.5-9.0 SP 4 93 3 13.8 B13 S4 17.5-19.0 SP-SM 8 86 6 22.7 B14 S1 2.5-4.0 SM - - 35 18.4 B14 S2 7.5-9.0 SP-SM 4 90 6 43.9 B14 S4 17.5-19.0 SP 5 91 4 20.6 B14 S5 22.5-24.0 ML - - 56 34.8 B17 ST2 4.0-6.0 SP-SM 0 86 14 12.3 Note: Parentheses around ASTM classification indicate sufficient laboratory data were not Leavailable to refine field visual classification, which is approximate. J 17 ® PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER _� + S21810.J1 B4 SHEET 1 OF 3 SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT Oakesdale Avenue Penton North Bound Shoulder I-405 24 LOCATION —A�pp . Sta. 14414 App3Er .35' Co., 2€€set 33'b ELEVATION DRILLING CONTRACTOR Kring Drilling Co., Inc. DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT 3 3/4" H.S. Auger Mobile B61 15' 28 Jun 87 1:00 JG Dehner WATER LEVEL AND DATE START FINISH LOGGER SAMPLE STANDARD PENETRATION SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS Z TEST O w a 0 Q RESULTS NAME, GRADATION OR PLASTICITY, U DEPTH OF CASING. F U w PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION. COLOR. OJ DRILLING RATE. � �-0 LL 2 a m 0 6"-6"-6" MOISTURE CONTENT,RELATIVE DENSITY w O m DRILLING FLUID LOSS. w O m v�i ~ a Z w (Ni OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE. O TESTS AND ? M MINERALOGY,USCS GROUP SYMBOL H INSTRUMENTATION Sandy gravel, 3 1 5" 1-24-35 Well graded gravel with silt and sand 2" Asphalt (59) Well graded gravels up to 6" cobbles, I S-1 Embankment Pit Run Well graded sand with 5-10% np silt Materials, rounded Brown, moist, very dense (GW-GM) 5 Gravelly sand, S2 10" 10-43-19 Well Graded sand with silt and gravel (62) With gravels to 3/4" 10-15% np silt, 10 Brown, moist, dense (SW-SM) to (SM) S3 18" 2-3-4 Sandy Silt, low plast silt with 35-45% (7) very fine sand, zones of (SM) also Gray, wet, soft (ML) 20%S 15 J. Mixed mud to minimize heave. S4 18" 2-3-4 Silty sand, fine grained poorly graded (7) sand with 25-35% np silt, S4 cleaner sand in tip Gray, wet, loose (SM) at (SP) 20 S5 13 1-1-1 Poorly graded sand, fine to medium grain 13:;;:; 4" heave - spun (2) with 4 5% np silt out before sampling Gray, wet, loose (SP) 25 f/ S7 16" 15-15-14 Well graded sand with silt and gravel (29) Well graded sand coarse to fine with 30 fine gravels(subrounded) and 5-10% np silt, gray, wet, dense (SW-SM) RF\/ 111R� cnAn•nisRF - PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER - S21810.J1 B4 SHEET 2 OF 3 A SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT Oakesdale Avenue ELEVATION 24.35' LOCATION Renton North Bound Shoulder I-405 DRILLING CONTRACTOR Krin g Drilling Co.,Inc. DRILLING METHOD AND EOUIPMENT 3 3/4" H.S. Auger Mobile WATER LEVEL AND DATE 15' 28 Jun 87 START 1:00 FINISH LOGGER JG Dehner SAMPLE STANDARD PENETRATION SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS z TEST O cWi a ¢ w RESULTS NAME. GRADATION OR PLASTICITY. _U DEPTH OF CASING, Q =3< > ¢w > PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION.COLOR. DRILLING RATE. Cr m 6"-6"-6" O w a U. w a INI MOISTURE CONTENT,RELATIVE m DRILLING FLUID LOSS. w w 7 �' > w OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE. 2 v TESTS AND w O Z ¢ MINERALOGY.USCS GROUP SYMBOL H INSTRUMENTATION 33 S8 1 " - - 3 13 19 24 Well graded sand coarse to fine, 10-15% (43) fine gravel, occasional 1/4" piece(sub- rounded) Gray, wet, dense (SW) 35 Trace np silt S9 14" 3-3-5 Poorly graded sand, predominantly Gravel in tip (8) medium, gray,wet,loose (SP) Trace np silt 40 O'. D.D. Si" 15" 27-33-37 Well graded ' g gravel with sand, coarse to 0 (70) fine in well graded sand matrix coarse t .'�:• fine, trace np silt, o. 45 (GW) Gray, wet, dense �., •O•.•o. 0: •o. 40. S11 13" graded O' g 24-24-26 Well r. gravel with sand, as above, (50) coarse to fine 1/2" maximum, subrounded ;•.0 O. in well graded sand matrix, 5% np silt 50 Gray, wet, dense (GW) :p;a S12 13" 16-25-36 Well graded sand with gravel, coarse to (61) fine with fine to medium gravels, 1/2" maximum, subrounded, trace np silt ..'. 55 Gray, wet, very dense (SW) .: S13 18"+ 50/6" Poorly graded sand, fine to medium Heave in S13 Gray, wet, dense }� Full sampler NHILL SOILS CLASSIFICATION AND TEST SUMMAR y PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tvpe np MArsn/xLs LABORATORY:.------------------------' - '------'----- --��� Reference:ASTM D 3080 ;_j ,.._ �. rCL o W�/� ' X w - i CC go CO - WK TT • }F i _ t U) , U) - Q + _ Q w 3.0 -- _ I-o d• 3 0 y o U) — t z-e NORMAL STRESS(psf x 1000) TEST TYPE:Consolidated/Drained Controlled PHYSICAL TEST NO. - - CONDITIONS A B C Height(in) D,gq'L 6.9q-L HORIZONTAL a Water Content(%) 15.0 15. 6 V� DEFORMATION (in.) o.� P Void Ratio - yz J ,3rB Saturation qq,6 Dry Density(pcf) 1 t1.8 z . . Time for 50% co w Consolidation (min) w Time for 95% _.. o Consolidation(min.) w u- Void Ratio after Z ..: _ m Dry Density(pcf) Y _ Q Water Content(%) 15. U _ _ . z Void Ratio .Flo,5 Yo ~0,1 1 `- Saturation(%) Normal Stress(psf) 2y 1'i•8 HORIZONTAL 3y�8'O DEFORMATION (in.) Maximum Shear(psf) Time to Failure(min) Sample Source 8-q C,_ Classification 6W) Gs Z c8 Eif Ma►diny Lawson Assoalatss Direct Shea) Test Report PLATE Engineers,Geologists a &Geophysicists R � JOB NUMBER APPROVED DAT REVISED DATE i y4� o �S P - PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER ® S21810.J1 B5 SHEET 1 OF 2 SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT Oakesdale Avenue 24.37' LOCATION Appx. Sta. 13+80 Appx. Offset 29,R ELEVATION DRILLING CONTRACTOR Kring Drilling Co., Inc. DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT 3 3/4" H.S. Auger Mobile B61 WATER LEVEL AND DATE 19' 28 Jun 87 START 0110 28 Jun 87FINISH 0600 28 Jun $?LOGGER GWA SAMPLE STANDARD SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS PENETRATION Z TEST U Q ZO a: RESULTS RESULTS NAME. GRADATION OR PLASTICITY. U DEPTH OF CASING. PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION,COLOR. -j DRILLING RATE. F p U. W w w m 0 6"-6"-6" MOISTURE CONTENT.RELATIVE DENSITY m DRILLING FLUID LOSS. w w 7 Z y w f NI OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL STRUCTURE, 2 0 TESTS AND w O m h _ r z Ir MINERALOGY.USCS GROUP SYMBOL m INSTRUMENTATION 2" AsFh Concrete 4" minus Gr in cuttings 2.5 S1 18" 23-44-35 Silty Gravel with sand (GM)- (79) 15% Silt 25% Sand 60% Gravel Tan, Moist, very dense 5 S2 2 ' 50/1" Same as above (GM) Bouncing Refusal Redrill .r 10 ST1 24' Plastic Silt 15 16 3-7-15 Silt, Gray, moist, very stiff (ML) MH (22) Sand in tip of sampler FS416" 10-10-17 Well graded sand with silt (SW) (27) 10% Silt 90% Medium to fine sand SM Gray, medium dense, and wet. 20 S5 18" 5-17-24 Well graded sand, medium to Coarse (SW) (41) Gray, wet, dense 25 S6 18 9-23 25 Well graded sand, medium to coarse (SW) (48) gray, wet, dense 30 - PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER S21810.J1 B5 • SHEET 2 OF 2 SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT Oakesdale Avenue LOCATION Annx_ Sta 13+8O AnnX nvc et 74 R ELEVATION 24.37' DRILLING CONTRACTOR _ Kring Drilling Co., Inc DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT 3 3/4" H.S. Auger Mobile B61 WATER LEVEL AND DATE 19' 28 Jun 87 START 0110 28 June 8WINISH 0600 28 Jun 8 ZOGGER GWA SAMPLE STANDARD PENETRATION SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS Z TEST O W J O RESULTS NAME. GRADATION OR PLASTICITY, _U DEPTH OF CASING. =3 a > <w PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION. COLOR. DRILLING RATE. p LL ¢ m 6"-6"-6" p w a-i¢ w a (Ni MOISTURECONTENT,RELATIVEDENSITY m DRILLING FLUID LOSS. w w p w OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL STRUCTURE. .1 O TESTS AND Z > �w m y Z cc MINERALOGY,USCS GROUP SYMBOL t i JO INSTRUMENTATION 32.5 S7 8" 15-50/5" Well Graded sand, medium to fine (SW) (100+) Gray, wet, very dense 35 21-47-42 Well Graded sand with gravel (SW) (89) 20% 3/4" gravel, medium to fine sand Gray, wet, dense 40 S9 4" 27-50/5" Well graded sand with gravel (SW) (100+) 40% 1" gravel 60% medium to fine sand Gray, wet, very dense •:: 45 S10 4" 50/5" Well graded sand with gravel (SW) (100+) 400 1/2" gravel 60% medium to fine sand Gray, wet, very dense "P: 50 S11 50-50/1" Well graded sand with gravel (SW) '•(100+) 15% 1/2" p ' .� . H 53 gravel 85� medium to coarse sand, gray, wet, dense 55 Ark, - Iim PROJECT NUMBER SOILS CLASSIFICATION AND TEST SUMMARY ASTM 02487 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: MATERIALS LABORATORY: TYPE OF SAMPLE: SAMPLE LOCATION: i _— SAMPLE NO: DEPTH ASTM MOISTURE GRADATION,%PASSING Dr1 SAMPLE INTERVAL CLASSIFI- P.L. I W L.L. SAMPLE LOCATION NUMBER ( I / DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL CATION (%) 1°'°1 M 3" 1'/1" #4 #1200 3r^�- / 1'L - !4 / 1,� �,c %. N (i S1.9 5/ IoD ivo 100 S 5 -S 7 Z 3.7.5 /( 6-roc/r cl �co ci V' 5 3- 37.5--3 P r r,j P'/ ter- . c/ cc /,=n:v-� Stv JG Z.S 3tv I va rd `GG'r•/ 5/v 47.5-4E- t4 CcJ // G s�c�t�f ;` G k/ ✓/�ti 5 S3 / S CJ II _ lY / 4ilc/ �•� �<ovi Spa /cO S 2 ,54 REMARKS. __.._�.....___ TESTED BY: DATE: COMPUTED BY: DATE: CHECKED BY: DATE: I AR FORM D24P7P 2178 Reference:ASTM D 3080 cQ7 , a - - x D. • - �i LL �•5 /•a _ Tw -i •° to 6.5 U) -- - cc w r,f NORMAL STRESS(psf x 1000) I.0 as -- TEST TYPE:Consolidated/Drained Controlled _ PHYSICAL TEST NO. - - _ CONDITIONS A B C °"/ °'3' °•3 Height(in) o,16t l I.000 0•�fg5 HORIZONTAL a Water Content(%) �I L4II:- (L/7,4 DEFORMATION (in.) P Void Ratio I.33g 31-14 .,jq ---- ? Saturation(%) 9_1•q Dry Density(pcf) z. i a�•S ��•S w -- C7 N Time for 50% W Consolidation (min) w Time for 95% _7 o Consolidation(min.) wu- Void Ratio after Z m Dry Density(pcf) v - - - a Water Content(%) 41, 8 u 5•L Ll5. 8 _ z_ Void Ratio i. e i f .l 3 r I•�S o ~ a,r w Saturation(%) 100.6 qq.3 99,5 Normal Stress(psf) '?-q 1,,y 1 y eti•df ';'u i 3,1 HORIZONTAL Maximum Shear(psf) 5 �, p i b6o 155L( DEFORMATION (in.) Time to Failure(min) Sample Source 5-5 yt�-t Q i�»S- ►4.S' — Classification 5,rpr 6"o Gs z.:Po C' Harding Lawson Associates Direct Shear Test Report PLATE Engineers,Geologists CI N941/0*ts,p*V Rvl &Geophysicists DR JOB NUMBER APPROVED DA3E REVISED DATE i %4 - PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER S21810.J1 B9 SHEET 1 OF 1 • t SOIL BORING LOG �.. PROJECT Oakesdale Avenue LOCATION Appx. Sta. 13+34 Appx. Offset 29'L ELEVATION 10.0' DRILLING CONTRACTOR Kring Drilling Co., Inc. DRILLING METHOD AND EOUIPMENT 3 3/4" H.S. Auger Mobile B61 WATER LEVEL AND DATE 7 1600 1 JUL 87 1655 1 JUL 87 GWA 1 JUL 87 START FINISH LOGGER SAMPLE STANDARD PENETRATION SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS Z TEST O U < O¢ w NAME. GRADATION OR PLASTICITY, _U DEPTH OF CASING. ¢ RESULTS ¢ 2 3 a > a w PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION,COLOR, DRILLING RATE. ¢ w m O 6"-6"-6" MOISTURE CONTENT,RELATIVE DENSITY O w a S¢ w a U !N1 m DRILLING FLUID LOSS. w w w OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL STRUCTURE. O TESTS AND w O m rn ? Z ¢ MINERALOGY,USCS GROUP SYMBOL y JO INSTRUMENTATION 2.5 S1 12" 2-2-3 Top 6" Silty Sand (SM) (5) Brown Bottom 6" Well graded sand (SW) Medium to fine, tan, very loose Gravel at 4' 5 S2 12" 1-4-20 Well ra g ded sand (SW) SP (24) Medium to fine gray, medium dense 10 S3 10" 14-50/3" Well graded sand, fine to coarse (SW) Gray, very dense 1/4" silt layer at 13 15 S4 12" 8-11-50/5" Well graded sand with silt (SW) SW-SM (61+) 100 low plast silt, sand fine to coarse Gray, Wet, Very Dense 20 S5 16-17-24 Well Graded Sand, fine to coarse (SW) (41) Gray, Wet, Dense 24,0' 25 j/ 30 PROJECT NUMBER �BNG NUMBER 521810.J1 B13 ~M� SHEET 1 OF 1 SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT Oakesdale Avenue LOCATION Appx. Sta. 15+92 Appx. Offset 30'L ELEVATION __ 15 0' DRILLING CONTRACTOR Kring Drilling Co., Inc. DRILLING METHOD AND EOUIPMENT 3 3/4" H.S. Auger Mobile B61 WATER LEVEL AND DATE 11' 2 JUL 87 1145 2 JUL 87 START FINISH 1230 2 JUL 87 LOGGER GWA SAMPLE STANDARD PENETRATION SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS Z TEST O W J U ¢ RESULTS NAME, GRADATION OR PLASTICITY. U W _ DEPTH OF CASING. Q S 3 Q cl:> Q w W PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION. COLOR. -+ DRILLING RATE. > rO W W U 6"-6"-6- MOISTURE CONTENT.RELATIVE DENSITY W a0¢ W O d U (Ni m DRILLING FLUID LOSS W O m Z W OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL STRUCTURE. 2 0 TESTS AND ¢ MINERALOGY,USCS GROUP SYMBOL y INSTRUMENTATION Gravelly silt (ML) 2.5 S1 12 3-3-5 Silty sand (SM) (8) 25% Silt, fine to medium sand Tan, Dry, Loose 5 S2 -4- 11 Well graded sand (SW) Sp (15) Medium to coarse Tan, Moist, Medium Dense 10 S3 14" 10-15-3 Well Graded Sand (SW) (18) Layers of medium to coarse and medium to fine Tan and gray, wet, dense 15 S4 16 6-13-13 Well graded sand (26) Fine to coarse (SW) Heave Gray, Wet, medium dense SP-SM. 20 S5 8" 26-50/2" Well graded sand (SW) medium to fine Gray, Wet, Dense 25 30 - rPROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER 21810.E1 B-17 SHEET 1 OF 2 SOIL BORING LOG il PROJECT Oakesdale Avenue LOCATION see map ELEVATION 1' 16' ± 1 2' Drilling Unlimited DRILLING CONTRACTOR � DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT Mobile R-61 4"ID Hol 1 owstem Auger 6 1/2 feet WATER LEVEL AND DATE START 14:10 FINISH 16:O0 LOGGER AEE SAMPLE STANDARD PENETRATION SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS Z TEST O w O Q RESULTS NAME. GRADATION OR PLASTICITY, _U V a Z¢ w DEPTH OF CASING a =;< > Q w > PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION.COLOR. DRILLING RATE > H O LL ¢ m 6'-6`-6' O w a S¢ w a O (N1 MOISTURE CONTENT.RELATIVE DENSITY m DRILLING FLUID LOSS, w wQ mw y Z > O W OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE. TESTS AND - Z ¢ MINERALOGY.USCS GROUP SYMBOL V) j INSTRUMENTATION S-1 16" 6-5-5 Silty sand--Sandy silt, no to low (10) plasticity, fine sand, 50/50 sand/fines 5 ST-2 24" PUSH brown, slightly moist, medium s (SM-ML) S-3 18 2-2-4 Sand with silt, poorly graded fine sand (6) 0 to 10% fines, red brown, moist, loose, :;V?k ' Coarse sand and fine gravel in tip (Sp10 ;H20 level 9S-4 18 8-17-31 Sand, well graded coarse to minus, 0 to �• •• (48) 5% fine gravel, 0 to 5% fines 15 • •••• 1 gray,wet,dense (SW) S-5 0 7-10-16 No Recovery. Water flushed sample out. (26) (No catcher). 20 S-6 6" 11-3-3 Top 6" sand, poorly graded coarse to 2" Heave (6) medium, with 3/8" gravel , 2 to 10%, 2" —— — — — — -- —— silt in tip harder again at bottom of 25 'T-7 0 driving. 00 psi PUSH, 22" refusal __ ------ --- - --- No Recovery Ito PUSH at 22", tip bent n gravel. S-8 17-19-23 Sand, poorly graded, medium to fine, Shelby tube sample create (42) 0 to 6% fines occasional wood, •i ::',high heave, Wash hole 5 gray, wet, dense. (SP) ,;;minutes, fine sand washes 30 : out. 10 blows to seat w PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER S21810.E1 B-17 SHEET 2 OF 2 • r SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT Oakesdale Avenue LOCATION see map ELEVATION 1' 16' ± 1/2' DRILLING CONTRACTOR Drilling Unlimited Mobile B-61 4"ID Hollowstem Auger DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT WATER LEVEL AND DATE 6 1/2 feet START 14:10 16:00 AEE FINISH LOGGER SAMPLE STANDARD PENETRATION SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS Z TEST O W O 2 RESULTS NAME. GRADATION OR PLASTICITY. U DEPTH OF CASING U < Z¢ w PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION, COLOR, DRILLING RATE. �0 LL ¢ w m 6 -6'-6 MOISTURE CONTENT.RELATIVE DENSITY O w m DRILLING FLUID LOSS J W W 7 �' > j w !N1 OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL STRUCTURE. 2 O TESTS AND w O m of ? f Z Q MINERALOGY.USCS GROUP SYMBOL vTinn0 INSTRUMENTATION -9 4" 50/4" Sandy Gravel , poorly graded Auger cuttings very medium to fine gravel 20 to 40% c: gravelly 1/2" minus to �:. . P#4, clean gray, wet, very dense (GP) O:D' 1/4" 35 - 0 6" 32-50/6" Gravelly sand, well graded, 1" minus Hammer assembly cracked. 0 to 5% fines gray, wet, very dense 40 O . o: ;e a S-11 3" 48-42/5 Sandy gravel , 1" minus, 8 blows to seat, stop clean, gray, wet, very dense (GP) pv^ penetration due to hammer TOTAL DEPTH = 44' breaking, sample may not 45 be representative, looks like washed by auger. i i i i i i i M WWI AN i M An AN AN CH2M PROJECT NUMBER :CHILL 5Z-Iklo .,It SOILS CLASSIFICATION AND TEST SUMMARY ASTM D2487 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: w"N P MATERIALS LABORATORY: TYPE OF SAMPLE: SAMPLE LOCATION: Bomar - SAMPLE N0: DEPTH ASTM MOISTURE GRADATION,%PASSING Dlr SAMPLE INTERVAL CLASSIFI- P.L. w L.L. SAMPLE LOCATION NUMBER ( I DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL CATION (%1 (%1 (%) 3" tY:" $r4 #200 �Ati 131T 51 2.S- S - T 2 - .PC IOU loo l oo 13 = 3`F 0 5 Sp 5 iz,3-� Sw '-i ✓ N 5� I Z1. %L4 5 ST7 2 -Z(, 58 Z 5.-2 SP S 3t.:-34 p SIo Pl:r_ 39 5 S - REMARKS: TESTED BY: DATE: COMPUTED BY: DATE: CHECKED BY: DATE: LAB FORM D24R7P 7/7P Reference:ASTM D 3080 1.0 - x ae �. . I o a S W 0,6 Xcri H - rn N acc a8to to -- --- _ cc W o-b N 6-6 o•y - NORMAL STRESS(psf x 1000) I o•� TEST TYPE:Consolidated/Drained Controlled PHYSICAL TEST NO. CONDITIONS A B C o ► o•} 0•3 Height(in) 0.4913 o.g95 HORIZONTAL a Water Content o t • DEFORMATION (in.) ~ Void Ratio 1, t98 �. z�, ,,Z.e y __ �. z Saturation(%) }.�. z&,g W Dry Density(pcfl fi5•L ��. ro s•S U ..._..._�. F' Time for 50% z _. N Q ____ ._ __:.�__ . W Consolidation (min) W Time for 95% U O.oc f 0 Consolidation(min.) - W Void Ratio after Z _ _..__ __ _.- m Dry Density(pcf) a Water Content(%) z Void Ratio I, (N b , o-r z ~00) o-f 0-7- 013 u' Saturation(%) 85.5 �L4• $S-5 Normal Stress(psf) HORIZONTAL Maximum Shear(psf) I Bo.o y u 0.o 1-+b-0 DEFORMATION(in.) Time to Failure(min) Sample Source 131,+ 5T-�- Classification fm r./lAuro 4D-w $ o (09 Gs Z. A C+�= „�/hen+ -F)A~ scvr ES+— Hording Lawson Associates Direct Shear Test Report PLATE i 7• Engineers.Geologists att h,M i4Z,, /04*-AD*%9 #vf &Geophysicists N JOB LU1u�ER 6G� APPROVED q „I TE e REVISED DATE 1 (l�(if� uG i - PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER 521810.J1 � PB4 SHEET 1 OF 3 SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT Oakesdale Avenue 15' N/O Fence corner, 40' S/O pil ' 12 LOCATION ELEVATION DRILLING CONTRACTOR Kring Drilling Co., Inc. line (Far E DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT 3 3/4" H.S. Auger Mobile B61 ridge 1' m 6/3/87 8:15 a. . WATER LEVEL AND DATE START FINISH 9.30 a.m, J. Dehner LOGGER SAMPLE STANDARD PENETRATION SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS Z TEST w < O ¢ RESULTS NAME. GRADATION OR PLASTICITY, U < U < Z¢ w J DEPTH OF CASING. a =;< > <w > PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION. COLOR. w DRILLING RATE. a 3 U. W n v0 6 fN16 MOISTURE CONTENT,RELATIVE DENSITY m DRILLING FLUID LOSS. J w w D OR CONSISTENCY, SOIL STRUCTURE, a 0 w o m v� ? TESTS AND Z ¢ MINERALOGY.USCS GROUP SYMBOL H JO INSTRUMENTATION Upper 2": Sand, poorly graded fine to medium sand with 5-10%no medPtl;msdenset. lt, gray/black, wet, S-1 18„ 6-10-11 (SP-SM) 21 Lower 1611: Sand with silt, well graded sand with 5-10% no plast. 5 silt, occasional small gravels, brown with rust mottle, wet, Road Grade medium dense. (SW-SM Upper 6": Sand, well graded with S-2 12" 3-3-20 occasional small gravels,r 5$ S-2 sampled (SP-SM) (j3) no plast. silt, gray, wet, loose Sample coarser in 10 to low-medium dense. (SW-SM) tip of S-2. Lower 6": Sand, poorly graded fine sand with 5%-10% no plast. Silt, gray, wet, dense. (SP-SM) S-3 -25-24 Interlayered: Sand, fine graine (49) poorly graded with trace no plast. silt, gray, wet, dense 10" heave in S-3 15 (SP) with sand fine to medium grained, poorly graded with S-3 mixed SP layers. small gravels, trace no plast. silt, gray, wet, dense (SP) Two 1" thick woodchip layers noted in top t tip of sample. S-4 10" 7-16-21 Gravelly sand, well graded sand (37) with well graded small to mediuff 20 gravels, subrounded to }", gray, wet, dense (SW) with 3-5% no plast silt to (SW-SM) S-5 9" 9-13-43 Sandy gravel, well graded sub- Layer y of woodchips & (56) rounded gravels to 1"+ in well silt noted in mid 25 graded sand matrix 65%G, 30% S, sample. silt at 5-15%, gray, wet, dens . (GW-GM) : z S21810.J1 PB4 SHEET2 OF 3 SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT Oakesdale Avenue LOCATION 15' N/0 FFnrp rnrnpr, d0' glo T-); 1e 3LEVATION �' 12 DRILLING CONTRACTOR Kring Drilling Co. , Inc. line (Far East DRILLING METHOD AND EOUIPM ENT- H -cZ_ nngpr Mnhil a TkA1 S/bridge WATER LEVEL AND DATE 1 6/3/87 START 9:30 a.m. FINISH 10:50 a.m. LOGGER J. Dehner SAMPLE STANDARD SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS PENETRATION TEST O w O ¢ RESULTS NAME. GRADATION OR PLASTICITY. U DEPTH OF CASING, U <w w PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION. COLOR. DRILLING RATE. a S 3 a 2 m > 6"6"-6" MOISTURE CONTENT.RELATIVE DENSITY O > O IL w w O m DRILLING FLUID LOSS. � w w 7 >> w (Ni OR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE, T TESTS AND w O m y ? Z Q MINERALOGY•USCS GROUP SYMBOL y INSTRUMENTATION 25 Sandy gravel with silt, well 1' heave in S-7 s S-6 12" 39-50/6" graded gravels subrounded to 3/4" it out, sample OK,pun in well graded sand matrix, with 10-15% no plast. silt, wet, gray, 30 dense. (GW-GM) S-7 4" 50/4" Sandy gravel (as above) , well S-7 fairly mud graded gravels, subrounded to 1", contaminated well graded sand leaning toward medium sized, 5-10% no plast. 35 silt, gray, wet, dense. (GW-GM) Sand, fine to medium (predomin- S-8 11" 33-50/5" antly) poorly graded sand with trace no plast. silt, gray, wet, dense. (SP) 40 S-9 6" 50/6" Silty sand with gravel, fine to 15" heave - spun out medium grained poorly graded in S-9. Sample OK. sand, with 15-25% low plast. silt , 10-20% small subrounded gravels, 45 gray, wet, very dense. (SM) Gravels at 46 S-1 0" 41-50/5" No recovery. Suspect gravels (GW) as below. Slight heave noted, spun out. Sample OK. 50 RED' 11 82 FORM D1586 t .t}�*L>k'�,T �4 r;+� "a�a� y'�••. _�.'"Gr+' r'�,rr• *s?.. 4 rri:.'�r; ��t�'�_a�.fiti r.f .,�q; .3�3,�_,• $��� �'�',;�:,; �.y 4r 3' dp[x i rrt•r'�;� .a�'tz - r•.,•�. '�` �its:. +.•r�'6�,1 �q:t3•: �.+"'���'S' �� a:l•, a o,'��.�` � �uyr., -' T rXM!`i4t•�+"`t•i r�' ti„��''"��[s$�•J�; Y{.Y ,� r' ap.7; t'6� r .l '�• '��-.b`fy y�• .Te,. I ..r—�s w�y�•� w;�'M °1,�i �M�'" '�b"r+; o)''6�'i t� i'o r ri '�i.�vt�f � r� ,a. •-''�btPY �.•�: e �'y'� Y mot- -�`:^,,����.� „r '�,�,-^ ��4 iTcib'b'"r "F,��'-t� ,,:. +.. � r "" ,,4 S +y .r.K .�, . ::-x"' �'.`.��1 Y.,M3 :.`'fi! ,w„'�'� �` r' �•'��• ;��?' � Kzr�Y'� >' r..r`'r, ` �+ '�,'kr�y�; •y � -�j t '6:T�,`^.a�'! +�. a i° h � 'q��,".��„�i,i�GYA•+1:�' '�"�^�• S y[�`�.,,,,s��; v ��4- � �' '^t�� ' �d�� .:.Y � � �i �"�.':k�a'S^4,t..l�e§,� Y .t�{�`",C•,�S ��'�r-" �lj^ r"��.�%ri„�,�e`. ���' iJ -y�. t,r. ;;�,1' :=ft y '.i^$ }�e�if.Y-Y ri_•.:55`` ,C�`}?5;:+1. 'a'i [Se�A�fr ar, i�at"'���3��{,�'� r. � -"h r4 ': r r>}.s��`i`F � � fb'` a 3M:+ � + A M � •,r.,,t �i"^YNr t ✓Q}ff'` �:r'4 t E•- r}� i C �, t lR } ne?st F M Y -..a - ,, 112, 11"'Mal �r-".r"c. c5:9`sil�'^•�a ' �s''+ .t.', ,"vi t •['b 5�:^ y'w.'.�'yhT� F9b`.4'+" ry .�. n`s`+t"!i'1+i - .�k:' .✓�iv(, < r Y•Zy1 ,rit ,..,c:. -�^r5 c' �e[.rw-, '•'? -" �'; r •r * .� 7�' as.r'`4 E].:tF'� r _.;y fir- , - a`•. PON v ca d�J�.;,.��q � r c `wvS�• -Cs'"'�caft�a.c +•r-y � e r r'k r r �` . '��C�y,3`t R r �T•- f v'.'� {• `.�+f,'.:. '1•' �,.'��=�•c {` . i}[ T , ka �ti=a fir:Y'ft •a wt�s v . B r '� e+ •..-y,� ..� tt r�� � �, } r� r w�v'�rtPCrli`th+k s]tE{IXP*Ts�" to 4.si:w�rF.p :w•'vs�.v � 4 t - et¢'''t' �'"Sr , r-�'',, #' . �' i"T` �i".t�� �,_�' - ' r"4.rr u�,f�i �.•� .. k 'xr �ro, rV�r? s�.''k ` �••,.x�`b. 4,['�� �+����<����,w�idMrt y"s •L a r , °a"" 4! i a'7a„`'�'��µ•g�+��',�•iv° �;M'r�e '�' K'm�s ,�; ; r- �xt:t`�t ,r�. r `� b Y. IT' l t t "'Sr �` j�F'- ! '1 rdi,+TY'ly'e 'r1,r ')•. w,4] -! l N� s i 'y'J! m x��•+..y7 ��' ?.1 �'i.���'. ",�'����� �±� ��' l Sf `kxrl`.�,�i-:.� •X �r `F'�'Y14.Wa}..`i ��t a•� '�{ �•� '4)•�� }+���. �+� ��+'V.�' ��ri 1�"-.. QQ 3 Leo ►.,jRrnm r x a ��r r a �-s�A�k r•`9' •r �: i �;'t� ( �S�.C�x��;�.���F �'.3. 7k,e�J i. � REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED BOX CULVERT � SOU THI,TEST 16 ST REET TREET Wti,� 4b w M t ^ � YI 1+F a F, RENTON, WASHINGTONNMI a " , � .taYlt t7 r .•kjf-{iVlr•N, s b /Y/'�" .+�`•`�a_- .j � •ATae%.., k�� S(♦ j�3 t FOR f T xr ? s r r 'r+ CITY OF RENTON ' --.t +:�,yti ' ,rN',ae^"'ri:Y'y;'°r+• .s'`'�'• y• Fi 1.:� ,e�i„. �r4 �a.�i , '+/.�v.•1 ,"'i'i-3�T>s��F•�a4rw y� (���n...Jl',.,y-dic:r'�' �� >. '- � �'��+ �a k'rl• .rar_., r 'vYti:-K'+�jif"S'� -r�,'r"'tr ,v�y?, 'S�x7S� t>ti9 -. ti :t+t"vy�''1'�aC�r'n � lty`;}+ �!"} "f� •-�..;- +u �' 1.,"��"��"7�����.M�•14 ° r��`�1r�'f 'r...e¢a t"''p' K, ±t,zR_ i r, ..k r,} rc. ya _ + `�{'�1><t'•. ;�„a?E' Y to•�sy.,a ••_--- > >_: ' ? f r ..;,t ��pp,� �'�F 4�.� T��s�7r7 •� �`,�c Y 1T 7��. rr�h r]3xa� G+ Y n e ,i7x r l�.ryY t s*Rr�,, Nil � �''I 4 '.� rr��_y', 'i6'c5•e,.�t ��t�.�i L'I!����if,j iT'r.tia ti��i r l: y .�4�.b'� � - <4'b�'`�' 4 ",- •p"vim` C;:_ r r F: c -;w• `4,t..K+^y,...ry t��4 " 71 rjr. ,., A. t, Prn>Y5• 'trr k't! yr .+ty. ..I,i�, aa,.•G" r �y/,� l j`': i� f f '4 '�f ft•�"#a` LrH n ah,. I Y •1 ., Y :• 'r i. r��+-r,nr p• 7 i'P' 7•±:,; `• >. !r I.ri, k Y.:lY r t a .1•ah r. , .'£-h7'M`"JJ vinir` `}'+yp, ) �f ,r, + y+ � r w,' •a( `4 Yr ��.Yr�}� ]. :.'6•v.��t u�_ 't`-�'�''r�j ;ic r1f�}r�,^ =bay .7� s �+ T'r-tf.�'�' MtY�f•7�r ?.:.*. a,'s's�'�.,7 VYs'!;F' 7 +.14ySr 4r•°�ti � ;r. t j- �� ..��. s'q`' 6 Tw .Ri �a� 4 i�tc' i"i� t r�q^r� y ��k3, �f' k� 3• '�'-J• i� 4Ai��'1 r.fC�[y i s4��`y .1,4° �+"K�„�1, �Sr Yri� Z.� �... .Y�' y N .Tr u t r v,,q� .. + y€ y`�fjpyd�•'s� �fi 4'� �' r ti= t.,:, fV�Tdfs, •� � c'.„. •� �5•"th���, h�rr �iy'�bY:. rJ i.' t.� , .,.n - f�,C �e w --����,Y1 ��`�� A, �tJP• �,r ^ 'Yt .` � } � t •y.���J ��`�]Nf• `r.•CSC ..l,.f.,'1,�`>ti " '�•�{.1�`+ q'' + � �.r�:F X M *'*..;t�'"�T+yr-+t ;M+t ... sY.• v.2' E,. q`tJ u�i,•S ;r '.Y �1`` a rl `� _ ,:1 5•+''�;131t1`*�`�'.f � ✓f ...,.�W l'y±a i ya ,� h! w•.,=Y'rl„ r A ,•. �:Y.�• f Y � T x D M � +�'F• i,y'R t t r,� '& G� �r S� v . \:)r.J.•,7( '�i^]f ^•W�iy','e[�•x', `'� C r >a.s ji' � g4 j' 4, ;�^. dyL r- a.S,- v'.v y*h4 1: 2Y v Hh ^. c" ^f• ♦r "'f,h�' ';jj��f¢;ry}}�;;; rR��: 't 1�. .u,,�., � y � 7` •T�- t,�"..;r�+t�.1r a r t`^` r .rr F +�,t 4 a.: GX'`�'Y5'i�ry�'��'' t ����4�Q Y�� w �� �4L'�t�•V' � T r,T ,t, �k ) 1 h"i.. is 2 �1 - r' ,. 1"1.�.,;•,x. +••�� '�.'1, ., Yr'ff��-`.Ft��� t�i��s t {.,..�,g j tli pp '�,�{*z��3r,.dC ��`�` � `•;`t- � _Y. .�. � ;}'y,��� _ � >,• t' '!r`; = a ;� E war��•s 4�t S � �. ,r P'}'.,;r�a"', � •�K�'` .. '� r.�,�, , imp, : t a F''�'1�+'#�•rf,F.✓»«c13te4f�siprttLasiF W�r iYby�, '�'+ a't t 'r � i •�"�:} �'` .uf . 7R7 �7 ' .r YLia.,y yv y t...�L''#@ . t+r ,t�.. �i �,d'."S• Y'i ! .3.r..r• +�.� ' ,+'� rM Y' ' S� � ,�^a�''} "5'Y .�. �e"Y �:,t�OF w �r X�"'l�,�yrp a,i • :ysa i� 3 �,.c•..I? .i � y. .+ rr,e,' ...,:n 4�' �t R�y,.1umSSr '� y'"�r �1a ';�r r���+ Kati r ''<t .y1 ram: 7 •: r=:}a'�y.} �C� »�s�T���� '� �• r., is .i r•: �� ; � � j � j K /A-.;4' :� �r;2 .1,T 1�', .. + r a'`"�}-ti .. �e ...• � ,^ A- tank '' T ✓�tCF%°� i��i r� s;2� r ,[fr`'✓`��'^l6 of kt ��y{_� >`•a Su , .,. N.Y � �;. �„/t: ,�Irt��fi�l��� ^fir r,� a 'A,Nr„n ra'y., ,�, ba t.C'tt'"� �4i.�'. Z. .;ir`rr, yfN,._6 t}I„ �•,��! � 'O� �,,�..-.fir ant^ ,:o •e ? 1.t•� ... '3�,_�F t h -z...efir"y,Y.s.•.:i',a,g, tti +Y"trtti{'' •'"'+^kY.y'•yj,�1.c ',:�. 4 �'r� t cY } ,,ti• y,•G. .yZ xLv. ,RUa, r :•� li., ".r ` s.. '�s a .r^s,:bra u• t.'+,ny� .rc �.�A .. t �' r �"atr�4"`� rx''r�' .•4 4 ✓ *�`"y i-ti Y.:` .•!4~ -'.,.. o w x ".3 ..pry],�. ct :v, ,•t i n�,`t s^' e 47.?.I„ �aiy�A •.�y by: �Y� t7 �i y�" '� ,�, r L•ssr��'�' T'- a� � ,RY S'•+�'��i���' i(h_':.'r�f•{{t'S. � •t'. Pt s a ° L,, ���� .1 _� .V ..t .. f �., `��:�y,_ s -. �+�,*'•i •e�-tt . 'f r- : �"��" � r'��`s�•`^`'cYt"s r .`. :,: ,r.;,.." ><" w .rt�,��t«. �� ,'#� . '.�•th�;- .rca,. a :t»;tif rJli .+i,t ri �. .. �.il r l , Cc a 2 KEY: c BORING LOCATION AND NUMBER 3 q ' PROPOSED S.W. 16th STREET P-1 BOX w i Bridge i • �sr 9r 0 40 80 ` SCALE IN FEET i 1 . ' REFERENCE: DRAWING ENTITLED "CONTROL AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY - OAKESDALE AVE. S.W.", BY TARGET SURVEYORS, INC., FOR CITY OF RENTON - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DATED �'\,/�GeoEn$Ineers SITE PLAN APR[L 20, 1986. `� Incorporated FIGURE 1 TEST DATA BORING NO. 1 r� 3 E DESCRIPTION 00 W 0 0 0 Group _ 20 oo mU w Symbol Surface Elevation: Approximately 15 0 . GRASS AND SOD ML BROWNISH-ORANGE MOTTLED FINE SANDY SILT AND SM SILTY FINE SAND WITH OCCASIONAL ROOTS (SOFT, LOOSE, MOIST) DS 32.6 86 5 ■ 5 SP BROWNISH-ORANGF MOTTLED FINE SAND WITH OCCASIONAL SILT (LOOSE, WET) M 30.8% 3 ■ 10 CS, 35.8 82 12 • GRADES TO GRAY IN COLOR DS 15 SW GRAY FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, WET) w � 15 ■ 20 BORING COMPLETED AT 20 FFET ON 1/23/87 �t F- a m w 0 25 i 30 i 35 40 Note: See Figure A-2 for Explanation of Symbols GeoEngineers LOG OF BORING �P Incorporated FIGURE A-3 TEST DATA BORING NO. 2 r ro CL a coc o m o o Group DESCRIPTION _� 20 1313 mu co Symbol Surface Elevation: Approximately 15 0 GRASS, SOD ML BROWNISH-ORANGE MOTTLED FINE SANDY SILT AND SM SILTY FINE SAND WITH OCCASIONAL ROOTS (SOFT T LOOSE, MOIST) MD 30.7% 87 5 ■ 5 SP— BROWNISH—GRAY FINL- SAND WITH SILT (LOOSE, WET) SM DS 27.30 89 4 ■ 10 SW GRAY FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH GRAVEL AND OCCASIONAL SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, WET) 17 15 Lu w � MD 10.8 127 19 ■ ?20 BORING COMPLETED AT 20 FEET ON 1/23/87 H a w 0 25 0. h J � 30 x 35 40 Note: See Figure A-2 for Explanation of Symbols 01-AS-4110'st- LOG OF BORING GeoEngineers �/ Incorporated FIGURE A-4 TEST DATA BORING NO. 3 mCL e 3 M c m a ce `o o m o 3 E Group DESCRIPTION Cd 20 oo EQ co Symbol Surface Elevation: Approximately 15 0 �utl GRASS, SOD SM BROWN AND BLACK SILTY FINE SAND WITH GRAVEL, WOODY ORGANIC MATTER, AND OCCASIONAL ASPHALT (LOOSE, MOIST) (FILL) MD 14.80 112 11 ■ 5 SM GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH OCCASIONAL GRAVEL (LOOSE, WET) DS 16.8% 116 5 ■ j 10 1 SW- GRAY FINE TO COARSE SAND AND GRAVEL (LOOSE TO GW MEDIUM DENSE, WET) 5 15 K Lu w MD 22. 1% 104 6 ■ OCCASIONAL LENSES AND POCKETS OF SILT AND U. FINE SAND 20 a w 0 u MD 22.3% 100 15 ■ n25 35 ■ GRADES TO DENSE 30 1 55 35 54 ■ BORING COMPLETED AT 36 FEET OH 1/23/87 OBSERVATION WELL INSTALLED TO 36 FEET ON 1123187 WATER LEVEL OBSERVED AT 7.8 FEET ON 2/6/87 40 Note: See Figure A-2 for Explanation of Symbols % GeoEn ineers LOG OF BORING �� Incorporated FIGURE A-5 KSK : KGB : EL 693-07 r 87 ' DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS* 3 � n SAMPLE MOISTURE DRY NORMAL PEAK SHEAR PEAK BORING DEPTH SAMPLE CONTENT DENSITY PRESSURE STRENGTH FRICTION NUMBER (FT) DESCRIPTION (PSF) (�) (') (PCF) (PSF) 1 3.5 Brown sandy silt with 32.6 86 500 220 -23 silty fine sand (ML/SM) 1 13.5 Gray silty fine sand 35.8 82 1500 700 25 (SM) 2 8.5 Brown fine sand with 27.3 89 1200 930 37 silt (SM) 2 8.5 Brown fine sand with 27.3 86 800 560 35 silt (SM) 3 8.5 Gray silty sand with 16.8 116 1000 825 39 gravel (SM) C m a *All tests performed on submerged samples at a shear rate of 0.05 inches per minute. i , . r ; : y' :�ti� 1 y t� • �`j �(�� ij i U -� !� A COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev. $49 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE PROJECT R L:�'56TL P/ Chanel 57 ) 6,71+q4 to �7g� 30 BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT 1� _w6l J t/ Ma e-r1QI SHEET / OF J hot r�.?*kerrt_ ouch- G ' �7! �f U5C 5 i ; I /Cole: Jw u,xs- +C t +ca M >q -.a ,R . -r;.. Ch•I�, IrYZL —/ : I t _firiQV /J' Z7,s Dss = /la rnrr► --- — t- --- --- s 3 Y 71 t A, 7mm 7 m n Tom JT MA D _ r -- t I I , T' _ SCS-ENG-353(REV. 3-70) LABORATORY N0. FILE CODE ENG-22 MATERIALS U. S. DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE SOIL CLASSIFICATION TESTING REPORT SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 6 "'ROJECT and STATE SAMPLE LOCATION 3� 1 -5719 b l + o 8 FIELD SAMPLE NO. DEPTH GEOLOGIC ORIGIN TYPE OF SAMPLE TESTED AT APPROVED BY DATES/g / SYMBOL DESCRIPTION u F o 0 p Z 8 o 0 $ + n « o Z 2 A DOD* O W a0m ~ (►►O 21 p z Z � 0o0z p w (Z29) p 0 ooa m 0 (IOU C ui ix aOS U) MUG) Z 0 y 00► U J(120 I Z 0 . ODE j (► a 10" t o�z ° (L 21) Usd ap Z _ _ m J OS (t) t9isd ►s ar J U) �- as m J .._Z (9SZ) Y s 02 h nag) 0111 fa (61l) 91� O1 J 2 F- (nsa 0zs 0 a O W 0 K6S 0) O£, S0 W O 0 ►0 N w 10200 0►, N J W O U620) O" Z �_ J nG2"U 09, Z 20 Q _ J U a KOIC1 0►1- �0 cc w (Wool ooze co 0 to 0 W ►00 ~ J F- S00 Q zoo a O W � N 100 W N < J E W J ,1i2 �i 9000 Z KQQ two W O E000 N n 0 z (� 4p 0 N zoo 0 U- >- W ryj V fA 7 w liti� 3 ona ]L� o c� Q 1HO13M A80 AB 83NI3 1N3083d + � W 2 0 COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev. "9 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE n PROJECT BY -D DAT CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. yi SUBJECT SHEET 3 OF —r- i t L i It, O o - 5 56 I �; 3y 4 Y y. ;s , -a;ha alc r•aKv I ' i I -- ---� - - - d BOREHOLE LOG DEPTH GROUND MOISTURE CONTENT% • SOIL DESCRIPTION WATER sPT RESISTANCE • (feet) a CONDITION N IO 20 30 40 50 6070 Loose, red brown, fine to 2 medium sand 4 1 • 6 2 41 Medium dense, gray, fine to Le1 s coarse sand and fine gravel 3 10— ' 4 12 5 ' 14 i 16 6 ^a Medium dense, dark gray, � a 18 fi.ne to medium sand H/7 20 END OF HOLE 1 PROJECT DATE 6-12-86 HOLE NO. RENTON BOX CULVERT LOGGED BY SHE TH-2 Figure 4 A.B.K.J. 220 W. HARRISON ST. ELEVATION 14' SHEET I�) DEPTH - 19' 1 of 1 HONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. �F • Geotechnlcol Engineering • MchtwW Testing • Construdlon Quwlty Control Inspection • GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project:.....Renton Box Culvert .... Test Hole Number:.. TH-2 S-4 ................................. a......................... 11 ..................................................... Depth:........1��--...............5............. Project Number:-,.......8638 Sample Description .......................................... Date Tested:-.....6/25/86 .... Gravel:..,28......%........ D ............... .... Remarks:..................1................ ........................... Sandi.....70..... = 7 mm 2 ....................1-1... . ..2......................................-,................ Silt % .100...................................... Clay:................... .................................................................................... SAND CLAY SILT FINE MEDIUM CRSE FINE RAV ARSE SIEVE SIZES 100 200 100 60 4030 20 16 108 4 44 1 11- 2 3 90 ... ........... ... ....... .. .... . 80 ........ .. ....... ..... ... Er 70 J . . Q60 ........................;,..........., .... 50 : >........... ....... .... W U 40 . . .. ....... .. ...... ry• ... t1 30 ....... .. ... ... ..... 20 10 . . ....... 0 .0005 .001 .002 .005 .01 .02 .05 .1 .2 .5 1 2 5 10 20 50; GRAIN SIZE-MILLIMETRES ............ All tests performed in accordance with ASTM FIGURE 30 BOREHOLE LOG DEPTH a GROUND MOISTURE CONTENT% 0 (feet) SOIL DESCRIPTION X WATER SPT RESISTANCE s N CONDITION 10 20 30 40 so 60 70 Very loose, red brown, mottled silty sand • 2 � (native material ) 1 4 u 6 2 g Loose to medium dense, gray, lb 3 fine to coarse sand, little 10 ' fine gravel 0 � 12 �v 14 16 e ium dense, dark gray, 18 fine to coarse sand t' 20 Very loose to loose, dark gray, t 22 fine silty sand with lenses of wood and peaty material 24 Medium dense to dense, dark gray 26 fine to coarse sand, some fine 1 to coarse gravel 28 l� Note: No recovery 30 12 � 32 —LLL 13 PROJECT DATE 6-12-86 HOLE NO. RENTON BOX CULVERT LOGGED 9Y SHE TH-1 ' Figure 3 A.B.K.J. 220 W. Harrison St. ELEVATION 15' ,SHEET Seattle, WA. 98119 DEPTH 58-5' 1 or 2 HONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. -_ Geotechnicol Engineering • MckterW Testing • Conatructlon Quo fty Control Inspealon • GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project:.......Renton Box Culvert Test Hole Number=�-1, S-2 ....................................................................... ............................................................ ...............-.......-......................................................................... Depth=...5..0"......6.5.1................................................................... Project Number:..........8638.......................................,,,,,•.,,,,........ Sample Description Date Tested:......6/26/86 Gravel= 1 % ........................................................... .......................... Remarks.........D 1.5.... .0.035 I rant ................................................. Sand=..........64%........ D5....=...9.,17.....tfAl1............................................... Silt:.............35%........ .............10.0. ...1....�..................................................... Clay............................. ....................................................................................... CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL FINE I MEDIUM I CRSE I FINE I COARSE SIEVE SIZES 200 100 60 40 3Q 20 16 108 -4 1 1't 2 3 100 777 90 ; .. . ..........:..:........... ...............,......,.....,............;.......; • ........... ........ .. ....... ....... ....... .... .... ....... ....... ..4..... ....... ............. ....... .............. . .. .. ....... ........ ...... cc . .. 70 . . .. Q60 ......, .. .... ... 50 ........ ....... .. W U 40 ... ....... ....... ....... .. ; . 30 ....... .... 20 ................... ,.... ....... ....... 0 .0005 .001 .002 .005 .01 .02 .05 .1 .2 .5 1 2 5 10 20 50 GRAIN SIZE-MILLIMETRES ReviewedBy: .......!1................................................. All tests performed in accordance with ASTM FIGURE 7 1 s PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER 521810.E1 B-17 SHEET I OF 2 I SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT Oakesdale Avenue LOCATION see map ELEVATION l' 16' ± 1/2' DRILLING CONTRACTOR Drilling Unlimited DRILLING METHOD AND EOUIPMENT Mobile B-61 4"ID Hol 1 owstem Auger WATER LEVEL AND DATE 6 1/2 feet START 14:1O FINISH 16:OO LOGGER AEE SAMPLE STANDARD SOIL DESCRIPTION COMMENTS PENETRATION Z TEST O w a o Cr 2 RESULTS NAME_ GRADATION OR PLASTICITY. _U DEPTH OF CASING. f U ) C w w PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION COLOR -' DRILLING RATE j F 0 LL w w m p 6 -6 -6' MOISTURE CONTENT.RELATIVE DENSITY Om DRILLING FLUID LOSS Uj w w m a w INI OR CONSISTENCY SOIL STRUCTURE. �00 TESTS AND Z Q MINERALOGY USCS GROUP SYMBOL rn_j INSTRUMENTATION i 1 S-1 16" 6-5-5 Silty sand--Sandy silt, no to low (10) plasticity, fine sand, 50/50 sand/fines 5 ST-2 24" PUSH brown, slightly moist, medium (SM-ML) ~ S-3 18 2-2-4 Sand with silt, poorly graded fine sand •�� �t�. (6) 0 to 10% fines, red brown, moist, loose, �•1•�•• Coarse sand and fine gravel in tip (Sp) 10 ;H20 level S-4 18 8-17-31 Sand. well graded coarse to minus, 0 to (48) 5% fine gravel , 0 to 5% fines gray,wet,dense (SW) :. 15 1 S-5 0 7-10-16 No Recovery. Water flushed sample out. (26) (No catcher). 20 ' S-6 6" 11-3-3 Top 6" sand, poorly graded coarse to '• 2" Heave (6) medium, with 3/8" gravel , 2 to 10%, 2" —— — — —— — -- —— silt in tip harder again at bottom of 25 ST-7 0 driving. • •:� 00 psi PUSH, 22" refusal ------ --- - --- No Recovery :1�,:;.to PUSH at 22", tip bent n gravel . S-8 17-19-23 Sand, poorly graded, medium to fine, ::Shelby tube sample create (42) 0 to 6% fines occasional wood, high heave, Wash hole 5 I gray, wet, dense. (SP) :minutes, fine sand washes 30 : out. 10 blows to seat U.S.Standard Sieve Size(in.) U.S.Standard Sieve Numbers Hydrometer 3 V/2 3/4 3/s 4 8 16 3040 50 100 200 100 1 IT Reference ASTM D 422 !-T T1 , go- 7-� 80- :1 1 n4r it 70 - 0 4-1 4;' 1 .1 k I I i 60- a) a: 50— IT Z Z 40 LLI 0 d: J w 30- 7 20- 10 IF 0 100 50 10 5 1 0.5 0.1 0.05 0.01 0.00­5 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES COARSE FINE COARS MEDIUM GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY Symbol Sample Source Classification 5T-3 1-;1-5 - -rfu*" <eo 44, D Applied Geotechnology Inc. Particle SI e Analysis PLATE Geologyncal Engineering Geo & Hydrogeology otv-c- 7 RAWN JOB NUMBER APPROVED ATE REVISED DATE n GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBI JN '—�' � < m GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION __ _ m 0 c` D10 D15 D3o O50 Oho Des DMAx. D. 0� 0so D� 085 DMAx. D. 0O 3 t �— FINES I SANDS GRAVELS _ m m ` z gg o SIEVE, OPENING,(mm) o o e �N 8 s °' US STANDARD SIEVE SIZE 1 o .oi R N m o o ,.. „�. - _ ,�, ;., I t t I O sa 'f 100 00 v cn 90 m 4 - 90 n _ :D p BO BO I Z - 70 ~ TO41 r, m w 60 3 0 r 60 o 0 . r So m 50cr z w o 40 m 0 r 40 m z < w U cc — 30 W o_ 30 i 20 20 I- Io b I I_ I 0 0 cg s $ � 0 o o ao o d ao o N •o 00 Q & g o $ 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS SPECIFIC ATTERBERG LIMITS SOLUBLEISHRINKAGE UNDISTURB ATTERBERG LIMITS SOLUBLE•SHRINKAGE UNDISTURBED CONDITION11. GRAVITY (G ) SALTS LIMIT SALTS LIMIT _ MOISTURE DP.Y UNIT WEIGHT m S NATURAL MOISTURE AIR DRY OVEN DRY MOISTURE ORAL MOISTURE AIR DRY OVEN DRY 4/cc (-)*q (+)*4 LL PI LL PI LL PI Pi LL PI LL % % p c PI %% DID ` - REMARKS �,C/SDOT Ltg�t Lo05� ��Pral Zo `/� )a (81C _ 3� u �So = In laf��0�4T►ant ��oi°�45`�/tl —_I'r�-4-0 n (eo aOro lo" If3 II 3" �- Engineers t Planners Economists - Scientists March 27, 1989 SEA21810 .K2 Mr. Don Monaghan City Engineer City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98005 Dear Don: Subject: Oakesdale Avenue Roadway Springbrook Creek/P-1 Box Culvert Construction � - Modification The following is a followup to our letters dated December 5, 1988, to you, and our letter dated December 8, 1988, to Joe Robel/State of Washington, Department of Fisheries, on the above-referenced subject. Enclosed you will find a proposed plan and sections for a reinf6rced concrete slab to be cast at a future date between the invert of the SR 405 box culvert structure, currently being constructed by the Washington State Department of Transportation, and north transition wall, which was incorrectly located approximately 9 feet north of the box culvert structure. This modification to the channel would be constructed at a future date when SCS receives funding for the remaining P-1 channel improvements. We estimate the total cost for the concrete slab to be approx- imately $6, 100. (See attached cost estimate. ) As stated in our December 5 letter to you, we have deducted $4 , 430 on our October 24, 1988 , invoice (invoice No. 904118) and consider this matter to be closed. CaAU5/0 4dtile Office 777108th Avenue,N.E.,Bellevue, Washington 206.453.5000 P.O.Box 91500,Bellevue,Washington 98009-2050 7 Mr. Don Monaghan Page 2 March 24, 1989 SEA21810 .K2 Please call me if you have any further questions. ince y, L C ris Sundberg, Resident Engineer ch/seSE5/008 Enclosure cc: Ken Glasby/CH2M HILL Mike Mariano/CH2M HILL Linda Korbus/CH2M HILL David Dishman/SCS Joe Roebel/State of Washington Department of Fisheries seSE5/008/2 CHzM • . W-1I11 FACILITY SUMMARY n � _/ PROJECT NO. J-�/1��� -_n���--� SHEET--=OF. PROJECT NAME GZ_r n_!•LLC� Lam_ - _---. ._.-..- ---------.--.._- PREPARED BY: FACILITY_ -Tj��1L f� /iG`�J- " C2 - EXTENDED BY: M D \ SPEC SECTION _._---. -- CHECKED BY:-- --- .-.--- I_�-I-�__1_ MATERIALS LABOR SUBCONTRACT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UN- UNIT AMOUNT UNIT TOTAL RATE AMOUNT UNIT AMOUNT UNIT TOTAL PRICE COST I 7( r, 7 < CF 1 I I I I I 1 171 i S I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I i i I I I , I I I I 1 I I I i I I I I I 1 I I I � I , I - I I I I I i I I 1 1 I I ! I I 1 , - I I I I . . . . . . . .I. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 . . . . . . . . . . 1. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . DO NOT WRITE ON THIS LINE: : : : : : : : : . . . . . . 1 - SUBJECT------- ----------- BY-L► aa1- DATE- • a ------ --------------------- SHEET---OF + ----------------- ---- PROJECT NO.--------------- lei, SWr 2 a'F 3 ia,u C WN-L-i- - - ® Gl-�.►JtJ� Z•rZ o,l 0,12 0./2 ' Z•l2 Illy _ — — — S t.A g • SUBJECT------------------------- BY—lit /��—.CI��S — DATE—�LI�� • a ------ ---------------------- SHEET—` OF—,-5 ———————————————————————— PROJECT NO.--------------- �e-►2 EW TV, P-1 ctkc�f��2 • f�OX GJUJ�T cv, Gw�s1� hoc Gu�v�r' ��oP�EU -T�?c��s1�'► a� S �� Ott w1 oTR OF- 5 �Ro Poste N6t� N E �C3o�c 1-71 D h� 1 EL 2-.1212- EL 0.12, `- --- Ex 1ST l►J G -1'P-.�r�1st Tf UJ l�-c�C.. �o�.lL No Tt✓ 1 : �RoJ� D�c gWt�u.S'"� '�pE Z - �L✓ �S Nt A,aJ�P�-cVP� ff-AC) RED{ KYum, U-*,U SUBJECT----- -------------------- BY_LI-�LazaZxa) DATE- 7L�� � � ----- - ---------------------- SHEET-3 OF� - � � ------ --- -------------------- F'ROJECTNO.--------------- o ►T. 3� c" C �L 2 12 �P OF t;C ism�SG _ ��`t�tfJ�►sta ww�u. -4 2-O TWce-,-:� J. 't.t c cy-- -s(-Ab To Top 2. Z m k--rGAA W►D TL-A Cle ivoX , w r � i GEOTECHNICAL REPORT OAKhSDALE AVENUE St bmitted to THE 6ITY OF RENTON J� Prepared by CH2M HILL Bellevue, Washington September 1987 1 Table 9 • EQUIVALENT FLUID PRES URES (EFP) AND SOIL WEIGHTS FOR DESIGN OF -1 CHANNEL RETAINING WALL ABOVE/BELOW D SIGN GROUNDWATER LEVELS Active At-Rest Passive Soil Unit Soil Unit Soil Unit EFP Weight EFP Weight EFP Weight (PSF) (PCF) (PSF) (PCF) (PSF) (PCF) 43/21 130/68 57/30 130/68 459/239 130/68 Passive pressure will develop at the toe of the wall as dis- cussed previously for the Oakesdale Avenue retaining walls , however, only limited passive resistance should be included for sizing structural eleme is of the wall and checking the overall stability. Passive pressures should be applied over or be limited to the thickn ss of the wall footing for de- sign of the wall under norm 1 loading or flood loading con- ditions and should be negle ted entire]_y for construction loading conditions . Seepage Control Control of seepage out of P-1 Channel is a major concern for the long-term performance a d operation of the Oakesdale underdrain system. Effectile control of seepage is required to guard against piping of $ubsurface materials into the Oakesdale underdrain system and develop a "short circuit" in the seepage flow path between the roadway and the channel . Seepage flow nets and head loss calculations for seepage paths from the P-1 Channel to Oakesdale Avenue indicate a piping problem exists because of the close proximity of the two facilities . These cal c lations indicate a critical need to provide a good filter zo e around the underd.rain gravel of Oakesdale Avenue and to mprove the head loss charac- teristics of the subsurface between the P-1 Channel and Oakesdale Avenue . The unde drain filter zone will be pro- vided by the geotextile blanket which was previously recom- mended to be placed between underdrain materials and native materials for the Oakesdale Avenue underdrain system. A seepage barrier is also recommended to increase the head loss between the facilities. At the P-1 Channel box culvert at SR 405 , a sheet pile cut- off and low permeability foundation material for the box culvert have been recommended as a seepage barrier. These provisions were selected since they required minimal change 45 i e to the existing box culv rt design and WSDOT contract docu- ments . However, beyond he box culvert along the open chan- nel, two seepage barrier alternatives were evaluated on the basis of relative cost and effectiveness as a seepage barrier. The evaluated alternatives were a vertical sheet pile cutoff wall and a horizontal geomembrane liner. Both systems were found to have comparable installation costs. However, for the same relative cost, he geomembrane liner provides: o Improved head loss characteristics between the two facilities by increasing the flow path o Reduced piping potential of material into the underdrain sys em as compared to the sheet pile cutoff wall. This is because the very dense nature of the lower sand and gravel materials and the observed variability of the interface between the lower dense sand and gra el and the upper medium dense sand compromise the construct bility and therefore the effective- ness of the sheet pile c toff wall. In addition, the geo- membrane liner was consi eyed the more constructable of the two alternatives in terms of providing an effective seepage barrier, since .the integrity of the system can be monitored during installation. A 5eomembrane liner was selected over a natural liner (clay) material because of ease of con- struction and it is believed to provide a better seal along the P-1 Channel retaining wall and box culvert. A 30-mil PVC geomembrane liner is recommended on the basis of the following: o Readily available material o Low cost compared to other geomembrane types o Easily installed compared to other- geomembrane types , i .e. , seaming in the field is much easier than other t,,),pes and is more tolerable to diffi- cult construction conditions o Easier to repair due to its ease of field seaming Foundation preparation recommendations for the liner are as follows : o Dewater to 5 feet below the excavation to remove water influence on subgrade materials o Grade the subgrade smooth and proof roll or in- spect to ensure firm, compact subgrade to support liner and construction equipment without rutting. Remove any pockets of organics or open-graded gravels to improve liner effectiveness 46 The liner is recommended #o extend the full width of the channel (approximately 60 feet) and should not be brought up the other side to create et "bath tub" effect. This is to reduce the potential for hydrostatic uplift lifting the liner. Place a minimum of 2 feet of native sand over the liner to protect it against construction equipment. Provide a mini- mum of 5 feet of final cover over the liner to protect against hydrostatic uplift . Proper attachment of the geomembrane to the P-1 Channel retaining walls and box culvert is critical to the effectiveness of t e barrier. The liner should be connected to the top face of the footing using a continuous anchor plate, which would seal the geomembrane to the wall foundation. An L-shaped transition wall will be placed at the inlet and outlet of the SR 405 , P-1 Channel box culvert, which will provide a surface to which the liner can be connected. This transition wall will tie into the P-1 box culvert with a water stop. • 47 - QvA�1TIT�S�Ce�STS �� - -- ENGINEERS ESTIMATE EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER P-1 CHANNEL STA. 670+76 -680+26.3'7 ITEM TOTAL RENTON NO. ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT RENTON COST SCHEDULE A 1. Mobilization 1 Job L.S. $38,676.95 $38,676.95 27.5% $10,647.02 2. Clearing and Grubbing 1 Job. L.S. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.0% $0.00 3. Structure Removal 1 Job L.S. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.00/' $0.00 4. Grass Seeding 2.7 Acre $1,000.00 $2,700.00 0.0% $0.00 5. Removal of Water 1 Job L.S. $130,000.00 $130,000.00 20.0% $26,000.00 6. Exc., P-1 Channel, Common 9451.0 C.Y. $5.50 $51,985.45 0.0% $0.00 7. Exc., Structure 11051 C.Y. $6.50 $7,182.50 0.0°' $0.00 8. Shoring & Cribbing 1 Job L.S. $30,000.00 $30,000.00 0.0% $0.00 9. Backfill, Structure 648.1 C.Y. $5.00 $3,240.50 0.0% $0.00 10. Topsoiling 5406 S.Y. $1.50 $8,109.00 0.0% $0.00 11. Concrete, Wingwall, Cl. 4000 82.6 C.Y. $325.00 $26,845.00 0.0% $0.00 12. Steel Reinforcement 18,420 Lb. $0.50 $9,210.00 0.0% $0.00 13. Corrugated Steel Pipe 60 Ft. $35.00 $2,100.00 0.0% $0.00 Rock Riprap 1,596 Ton $20.00 $31,920.00 0.0% $0.00 Filter Material 689 C.Y. $17.00 $11,713.00 0.0% $0.00 16. Wire Mesh Gabions 156 C.Y. $100.00 $15,6C0.00 0.0% $0.00 17. Fish Habitat Structures 1 Jo L.S. $5,000.00 $5,0W.00 0.0°i $0.00 18. Erosion Control Blanket 5759.0 S.Y. $1.25 $7,198.75 0.0% $0.00 Subtotal A $391,481.15 SCHEDULE B 1. Salix cotteti 520 EA. $3.50 $1,820.00 0.0% $0.00 2. Amelanchier florida 75 EA. $40.00 $3,000.00 0.0`/ $0.00 3. Cornus stononirera 75 EA. $30.00 $2,250.00 0.0% $0.00 4. Prunus virginiana 75 EA. $30.00 $2,250.00 0.0% $0.00 5. Mohonia aquafolium 75 EA. $30.00 $2,250.00 0.0% $0.00 Subtotal B $11,570.00 Subtotals A+B $403,051.15 SCHEDULE C 1. PVC Membrane 2,589 S.Y. $9.50 $24,595.50 100.00°/ $24,595.50 2. Concrete,Tran.Wall & Slab, Cl. 4000 68.9 C.Y. $325.00 $22,392.50 100.00% $22,392.50 3. Steel Reinforcement 8,-. , Lb. $0.50 $4,305.50 100.00% $4,305.50 4. Exc., PVC Membrane 5,072.2 C.Y. $5.50 $27,897.10 100.00°r' $27,897.10 Fill., PVC Membrane 5,072. C.Y. $5.50 $27,897.10 100.00°/ $27,897.10 Pedestrian Trail 1 Jo: L.S. $12,000.00 $12,000.00 100.00% $12,000.00 Subtotal C $119,087.70 TOTAL $522,138.85 $155,734.72 - :ut. WAS HINGTON 5SaR CONNECTING C.HA%NI+Jr=L CUB SHEET t HIND SWZPACE �RR-A o;= Tt] i3F_ _ STEEDED. - - _ -- ST--- IE �T-TP�c�i-i D SN Et✓TS �OiZ . LP�$�l.rD �AtS tIJO_TE LP E'ELED AR.E.PRS N o-r -ro sc -�o�. �E�E2E►�G ON�--y CALCU Lb%-T l OWC, Q-V-- S Up T_�F_ AR.E�AS (SEE PG ®,"--SSUMa - SLOPE =O ,�.LAN14G-5 G?PS_ E-D OT_ir_R� Y :� r ;t ® SLOPE _ 3 : I �' F-AC,T op_ t 3 3 3 3.o00 PL?�NI t��TEt2 \Jl inZC4p 3►3� ,7o r-Tz !Yv (5. �� irn2)( 4o-Ft 12 = g240 F-72- 1nJ ?52 �T� z in _ D aIZEA = (O. ©�oZin21( 40 f t��- = C19,20 FT2- E SLOPE ��C,To�,= i • CS 4 06 Vl '�nz )(�40 2�*T OG SC-4,uE, so 4'1 WAS H )NC7TaN ESGf2 �.bNN�G�" fNG GH/�1�1N�L GG H 6-2-93 QUANTITIES - SEp !_NCr___. of �l c�LGUI.P�T�ONS OF SU�F�{�G� A�IZ�A Fop- SE F- A-T7AC,' H C-D SHEETS N Se--ALE 50. 1 1 , 0002 - 400 4 r-T 0A = (2 . 64 �r,2-)�_4Of �-._r 4zz.4 , 00 FTzI O A��,� = (3. 3 p ► r�Z- 4v �in�Z _5 200. 00 FTZ771 _�—�- -- - s+.�a%au t6+ '�rp c:+,�vA'C� �P � �N 'l J V r`u urah+t .,,.;�• 40 2-5-7 .S 2 �TZ © AREA = 1.04 ��,2 (L4c>f 1 Y,I AREA 00 F:7-- \vASH ING-- TON CIHA..NN EL C.G-H �tU{�tJ71-T e5- F-I LC�-P�Z _PtS- SHEET - - - -- f 14�7-El'&KS Wela-e r-OuNfl 3y ►MSTEP, ON -TOPCX7?.�PH k c ►^Ps A T:--r ER F 1 L L 1N U GSE-E MAPs S L o p�E = o r-O P- 20l GON To L kR- ONL.., _ e'Lo T �c ._0 o b n 13' �S•3S ir,�-� c}Q�� `? - 4544 t bS4 = 423Z. 8� FTC C 1n E !G' [(-7.GG 4Dft z - Ss60 � 1.OS4= 38113.g5F-T� <<fi' I(D ,(0►n2 + 1.63in2) 40ft1Z1 )k- 1.C)g4 = 37160. E-7 �F--TZ �h J a� F-I U-6 D SAME P�cX�Dc tP� PAS f�B Dv� GUNTDLkR, C.tN E ARE�?K r� ►8' C3. ►z in2) f 40 � t z � �-may - 5261 . 5? �TZ -05 4 = 24bz. . i 4 FT 2 �vAs H 1 N,GTO N �SCT� �D N N 1�-T ►tJ G �.11�N N�-�- CG H o VA1-M 17 1 e S _F-I DI NC-7 - - - - - -'- -_C.� _ - -- _ He'ET t AF TOTAL S l tjzr-ALE AIZE-f&, I N 3 I C,1 U g 240 -00 .75 2 .00 25T7,6, 52 _ 4Z24.00 S2 S ,00 ro . 1664. 00 ��Ra,00 se:!at;%:�:,vt2�,Tc-JY ty�t.ti�sy�et�etK.y{�r.,+�,'s��r�t%°i(,t�L�G•• �/ .{..cur•'s�`t�,+��...s:c:�.+c�';',t'-- tn.�.✓'.:%F:*t. ..�.>;, tt �rf � y.✓x Yo:}S.G•..�j• •� .:y�•• �, ,.�.4r� 3g95, � 376 0. b-1 1244 a,0n- 5 2G 1 .S-7 2�62.. 14 92 .1� 023 . 2-0 PT 12 , 1 j A C Ze S l �135b0 �TZ� POINT /NAME /�'OR-THIN G EASTI/VG CUr ,fI DATA CUR VE#2 DATA / �Y> N CHAI'/NEL �c LOW fZOW �.✓ MG.'✓UMENT(SW 167}✓ST.) 17J,156.66 67 2374'10" = ?J7470 f STA 670t31 1479?6' D - 19D535" . 1,654,103?6 Fr STA 671 t 44.35 17J,157.1J 1,654,792..68 400.00' R = JOO.00' PC CURVt-f1 STA 672t1J87 77J226.J5 1,6541B6.19 82.85' T= 62.1J' PT CU.4Y/1 STA 67J+ , 77.25 17J,J81.47 1,654,136.60 1 16J JB' L = 117.54' ¢ STA 674491.37 7J,481.50 1,654 06J.70 / PC CUk✓Ej2 STA 671,17751 17 790.41 1,654,201.E1 / PT LURPE�t,? STA 67J+00 GS 17J,J06.74 1,654,16.5.92 \ / MONUMENT \ .°p ti�• \� \ \ ado MMPOi / L���/ MAY Bi 48"PIPE \ \\ \ 1rr i�'FGE, /' 71�/S'A, 7RANS/7101✓ 54OPE2 -� � �� \ �� E�Sn��/ I y,�. ,.••; ,. .• ''•, _ cM END dF I" .t 1 _ ......... - S 6 t •.B E 9 '•i .. Wes:— CniAVVEL �i _ _ .1 .STA�6; N' 16th B.4iDG£ ;�. - _ C A ?✓L )0 NOT DISTURB C StA 7. . SE£DETAIL A L TnANS/170N WALL SHEET T 1 n SEE SHEET 12 EX/ST7/✓G 1?"PIPE +� 1 1 1 r EX/STiNG RETAIMNG WALL 1 SEE D_7A/L B SHEET _ DO NOT DISTURB (F ExiSTI/✓G 30'PIPE NOTE: No representctic public or private _ these drowin9S T 1 '�� ��.� utilities o snth re e- �, '( \ ` n ore ow , the J — C t opprcximcte. 7h, . r' �BL�NO FROM . :� � • EX/STING SLOPE . . . . a A - rso, • : l Pi�. G& PT CURh 3 R ; TRANS1770N SLOPE t_ 74.28 �O rO END OF WINGWALL Q�• TRANSI RON �a Q RE yy7�`✓GrYAL CU SLOPE _ L SEE SHEET 10. rf�TO TEMPORARY SHCRINGA.M.Y SE NEE0,D IN a � 15. PT' CURTHIS AREA )J C Rt JG..00MNGWALL . ..g W C8ANN-rL STA: 578+JG. FLO • W rn .:. LO 2� DO d (� 0I � Nz �I cLE PcINT. .r- r•l SEE DETAIL A THIS SHEET I I EEXIS77NG 18' PIPE a EXISAvG TRA ✓51170N WALL EXISTING RETAINING WALL N01 ,AB 00 NOT DISTURB DO NOT DIS7UR9 r No rd - EX/STING RETAINING WALL DO NOT DISTURB \ �2 • a� Is lz� I N etc ` clFF� opt- ROCK POWER POLE P N S. rQ.ELEV. .8.0' a 1/0�y ROCK RIPRA/? TO._ELEV. 8.0' NO CHANNEL TO FXIS771V/ ! GROUND FROM EDGE OF S W. 76th STREET BRIDGE TO STA. 670-k 76 '� 16 J H HD A��� -- �� S W. 16TH STREET i D.D. , 1 NRIGHT OF WA Y RIGHT F WA Y HO SE 1 M W II Lu S) i e ti � LL r � � �� 8,6� � ti 7-0 - _ EX/STING 1 �S 46 COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DKPAH7MENT OF AGRICULTURE trvG-.i:'rA P. 9-09 5t3IL_CONSERVATION SERVICE fYROJtC"f WA5}JLNGTON --- ' -i -: -R GO N N E"7 t NJ - - - t,y D s T 7CHtCK1= 3Y J(DATE rJ08 NO. GCT H- P ILL .. ... ... .._ -- - 1 I __ -_-- _4 L J 17 I , I 1 I— ' ! I f _I I �t I I ! . f 1 , � . _r T , I i V T�,vtPoR92Y CONSTRUCI70N Maw LIMITS I Fi5R �' E���r .� t\o rs S.R. 405 \ BRIDGE C a Nam, e� /• '- \ c� N 55.-96 i ---- or-�� E 1,65,E 987.96 D o H TCHED AZv— , % IL LFD4\:PFATvB � sE Eon #1,J0TE AREA To, BE FILLF-D AT 3: COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRJCUILTURE SOIL C,-JY3ENVATj0,Iv SEHvICE IPJ4 OJE T IES,6rP, C-or-INF—C-ToNGr CJ y _IQWEi:kklS_Fjy ._. - - JOB No. CG-H *F- ILL- ;:S HEET OF- _ _7 7 171 L4 _V t ( i 1 � i j - -- - _r. _�- I i � � t - i . t A_ ............ A t r .1 IL 17 �f j Cl5 ) t U 5) = z7� 2 T / 2,D f Z f 1g ► 1ST- - 4 . +Z, Ac . EARTHWORK COMPUTATION SHEET JOB : ESGR Connect. channel COMPUTED : B. DALLAs STATE : WASHINGTON DATE : 05/18/93 COUNTY : RING CHECKED : SPONSOR : DATE : ITEM : CHANNEL EXCAVATION SHEET : 1 AREA AVE OF DIST. VOL VOL STATION SO FT END AREA FT CU FT CU YD REMARKS 67076.00 0.00 67115.24 362.08 181.04 9.24 7104.01 263.11 67173.24 272.96 317.52 S8.00 18416.16 682.08 67190.32 257.60 265.28 17.08 4530.98 167.81 67198.46 326.75 292.18 8.14 2378.30 88.09 67198.46 266.43 296.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 67240.90 334.61 300.52 2.44 12754.07 472.37 67270.56 188.38 261.50 :9.66 7755.94 287.26 67291.10 405.57 296.98 20.54 6099.87 225.92 67316.28 596.49 501.03 25.18 12615.94 467.26 67342.85 608.43 602.46 26.57 16007.36 592.87 67465.93 648.54 628.49 123.08 77353.93 2864.96 67476.04 329.02 488.78 0.11 4941.57 183.02 67476.04 363.27 346.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 67484.68 168.84 266.06 8.64 2298.72 85.14 67499.53 561.44 365.14 �4.85 5422.33 200.83 67507.18 0.00 280.72 �7.65 2147.51 79.54 67659.15 0.00 0.00 1�1.97 0.00 0.00 67673.18 308.24 154.12 �4.03 2162.30 80.09 67680.84 430.21 369.23 7.66 2828.26 104.75 67698.65 606.53 518.37 17.81 9232.17 341.93 67712.68 423.56 515.05 14.03 7226.08 267.63 67762.90 368.30 395.93 S0.22 19883.60 736.43 67762.90 477.77 423.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 67805.37 526.62 502.20 2.47 21328.22 789.93 67809.87 529.77 528.20 4.50 2376.88 88.03 67824.72 262.67 396.22 14.85 5883.87 217.92 67830.72 405.58 334.13 6.00 2004.75 74.25 67842.80 0.00 202.79 12.08 2449.70 L 90.73 ............ ...... TOTAL = <9451.95 CUBIC YARDS ................... .......... ........ i EARTHWORK COMPUTATION SHEET JOB : ESGR Connect. Channel COMPUTED : B. DALLAS STATE : WASHINGTON DATE : 05/18/93 COUNTY : RING CHECKED : SPONSOR : DATE : ITEM : STRUCTURE EXCAVATION SHEET: 1 AREA AVE OF DIST. VOL VOL STATION SO FT END AREA FT CU FT CU YD REMARKS 67190.32 0.00 67190.32 171.82 85.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 67198.46 168.62 170.22 8.14 1385.59 51.32 67198.46 175.81 172.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 67240.90 169.69 172.75 42.44 7331.51 271.54 67270.56 161.02 165.36 29.66 4904.43 181.65 67270.56 0.00 80.51 �0.00 0.00 0.00 67673.18 0.00 0.00 4 2.62 0.00 0.00 67673.18 308.24 154.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 67680.84 423.32 365.78 7.66 2801.87 103.77 67698.65 0.00 211.66 7.81 3769.66 139.62 67809.87 0.00 0.00 111.22 0.00 0.00 67824.72 573.21 286.61 14.85 4256.08 157.63 67830.72 405.58 489.40 �26..08167842.80 0.00 202.79 2449.70 ................... TOTAL = 11.. ._:0..;> CUBIC YARDS COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev. 8--69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE n PROJECT ' BY ID DATE 93 CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT SHEET OF - _ 9 .._-�_ w.._�-__ �r_.Wr... �Y`� lJ��� J 1^l ����./�_....Y.f__�`1 �� J ✓�i� /�Pr/� �0 �o>aowaY ti PtrA� WIS,�/4 TP2 C moo/ t'a iZGt `��' QSo/ �S 5rz41 Z4 /Db is►� Sam U � 0.7 �57/ji,A/G rfEQ t? COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS—ENG-523 Rev. "9 SOUL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE KIP PROJECT 47�SG BY DAT�/ 3 CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT SHEET 4 OF 3 aSe ZS {o/ tau 2hd Zs �� nort er�d `s'. •.ryW�t',eW+ b v. i} � � b � ,.� 'it�kte,S,f>` am �iii: :�4,•r F i9 I w .. • 4Z,gZ5 �' G�9KSp4l,9 �QJ� ) ( �o3Co-oo�70 z—,7 3 F,0 l DAY 5 c--/z2 - 5 1'oa'f- 4-or�fzs 3 �narJ cre�J 3 40 4,Zoo, o0 Z?o 9:1Z- ' 7bo ��t�5 /' 000 °o ora rt e wry 1,4 - / COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev. 8-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE Wq PROJECT BY Z3) 1 DATE/ CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT SHEET OF-3- 3 _ ZZdp o0 lA e 13/ue �a�C _� X y =� 5� da 700`m %o T��- �u(� � LSD• o0 i - -�5JB -ro `- /3, 10� 0 4 Z,o o O Zz , z7 8 Ed3:: t4r1-a tr �t:.+ .•3" E 1 J` K �. e:s' Wt t � c6nt. o 'rro t i i -0s574 %�TAc. 27) 57 Z -�— SAFETY STANDARDS for CONSTRUCTION WORK Chapter 296-155 WAC �,ou�a�•w,:,yam SAFMAM►*WN i Division of Industrial Safety & Health DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES STgr�O � 6 � a' > a F414-033-000 (printed 12-90) t'-' V�� j Figure B-2 Slope Configuration for Type d Soil Stinnort or Shield System i 1 e� 20'Maximum 18"Minimum Total Height of Vertical Side Vertically Sided Lower Portion Excavations 20 feet or less in depth which have vertically sided lower portions shall be shielded or sup- ported to a height at least 18 inches above the lop of the vertical side. All such excavations shall have a maximum allowable slope of 1:1. Figure C-1 Slope Configuration for Type C Soil 20'Maximum -- 1 1 112 Simple Slope 1. Simple slope excavations 20 feet or less in depth shall have a maximum allowable slope of 1 IR:I. • -12- �` � IZT t , (iv) The soil is part of a sloped, layered system where the layers dip into the excavation on a slope of 4 horizontal to 1 vertical (4H.1V) or greater; or , (v) The material is subject to other factors that would require it to be classified as a less stable matenai. (n) Type B. (i) Cohesive soil with an unconfined compressive strength greater than 0.5 tsf. but less than 1.5 tfs: or (ii) Granular cohesionless soils including angular gravel (similar to crusned rock), silt, silt loam, sand loan and, sometimes, silty clay loam and sandy clay loam. (Ili) Previously disturbed soils except those that would otherwise be classified as Type C soil. (iv) Soil that meets the unconfined compressive strength or cementation requirements for Type A. but is fissured or subject to vibration: or (v) Dry rock that is not stable: or (vi) A sloped, layered system where the layers dip into the excavation on a slope less than 4 horizontal to I vertical (4H.1 V), but only if the material would otherwise be classified as Type B. (o) Type C. �- (1) Granular soils including gravel, sand, and loamy sand: or (ii) Granular soils including gravel, sand, and loamy sand: or (Ili) Submerged soil or soil from which water is freely seeping: or (iv) Submerged rock that is not stable, or (v) Material in a sloped, layered system where the layers dip into the excavation or a slope of 4 honzontal to 1 vertical (41-1.1V) or steeper. (p) Unconfined compressive strength. The load per unit area at which a soil will fail in compression. It can be determined by laboratory testing, or estimated in the field using a pocket penetrometer, by thumb penetration tests, and other methods. (q) Wet soil. Soil that contains significantly more moisture than moist soil, but to such a range of values that cohesive material will slump or begin to flow when vibrated. Granular material that would exhibit cohesive properties when moist will lose those cohesive properties when wet. -26- �' EARTHWORK COMPUTATION SHEET JOB : ESGR Connect. Channel COMPUTED : B. DALLAS STATE : WASHINGTON DATE : 05/18/93 COUNTY : RING CHECKED : SPONSOR : DATE : ITEM : STRUCTURE FILL SHEET: 1 AREA AVE OF DIST. VOL VOL STATION SO FT END AREA FT CU FT CU YD REMARKS 67190.32 0.00 67190.32 97.34 48.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 67198.46 81.90 89.62 8.14 729.51 27.02 67198.46 89.71 85.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 67240.90 82.62 86.17 42.44 3656.84 135.44 67270.56 86.12 84.37 29.66 2502.41 92.68 67270.56 0.00 43.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 67673.18 0.00 0.00 402.62 0.00 0.00 67673.18 233.47 116.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 67680.84 176.96 205.22 7.66 1571.95 58.22 67698.65 0.00 88.48 17.81 1575.83 58.36 67809.87 0.00 0.00 111.22 0.00 0.00 67824.72 403.26 201.63 14.85 2994.21 110.90 67830.72 360.45 381.86 I 6.00 2291.13 84.86 67842.80 0.00 180.23 12.08 2177.12 80.63 TOTAL = 58 J:1::: CUBIC YARDS • l.. r. Ltr'.1til�.dct/�lYLC .�......�y:..l�s:.:. ' (riiGJc C't WAr�,H INO-TQ.N 1,,-lNEr,7iN NNEL GV H J I�r:.iCr:k• si' 1:�.;r:- I .i�:i �J�.i. : OUAtNT I T IFS TOPS IL . I IND TOPSOIL : � 1 - C-ALC a LN't 10 tiJ OF: SLtZ FACa , ��. ,a+ A. ► I {. ! . ! . � -1 c f I t AREp,�.-,.. .�tiM_II 4 flt i I 9 'D�t ir--r f F� AN 2 . f. 1 r�).. 1__ �_ 2 0 _ -- F l_pP.F I_ :y I.t. t•8Q ( I' 2f3' l 1 r ;'FACT' _ __�_ _aQ -_ 19 1. ._ i ) 153 6. 43 F-T� . IT � , 2N7 TI U. ::. ✓!i �.n l"Pfr JV7 Qr'A�ler�:UL r'aea LCilL Ciih:.tft✓A7"ibN �::hVita' wA��HINUTON I ESG-TZ CoNiNECT/NCr_..C.1-f/�NNtL C CT{-I Tor S[] w QUANTiTI�S ` �V I L . .I C-ALGVL�AT1Ot�1S tdF ' i�.� � �_�- -- -• -- - - .� ro1Z. TOPSoI � �� _ ( c�7 ;�_ AP 480. 77 6 F T? i T71 O _ - 11 �.. A�II --;C . , - 4t. 1. �. t�� ( I� _ - �- =�. �3. 38 FTZ , TOTAL S.1,1 Z,F-NC,E5--t-- , 0-14 I r ys`z.00l.. ; 1 - ,1 ' t I,20.oo. - - �3q2 2 _� ; .. 351aO, . .. ;....� ! �\ MONUMENT (SW 16TN ST) 17J 156.66 25.67 �' ( \ \ STA 670t3/ 17.J,044.28 1,554,20326 D \\ ¢' STA E71 t 44.35 17.7 157.13 1,654,192.68 R PC CUR I EEjl STA 672t 13.87 173,226 35 1,654,186.1.9 \ PT CURVE11 STA 673+77.25 173,381.47 1,654,138.60 L l ¢ STA 674t.91.37 7�481.50 1 654,083 70 \ �sy PC CUR tiEt2 STA 671 t 77.51 17.,190.41 1,654,201.61 PT CURVEt2 STA 673t 00.05: 173,306.74 1,654,165 92 tl. £X/SPAIC RETAINING WALL DO NOT DISTURB \ MCNUMENT V ►o / \\ / W''�' POWER POLE \� = 'ROCK RIPRAP \ /� F�„ • \ \ r /SAGE�iN 61 '? �} �. ', \ `✓/ An ,BLEND.TO 6. \ x { E'XISTWG td X- , ROCK'P/PRAP N S ?�'7�• Z ) PE S.W."CABIONS (o.CHAN/✓EL.......... FO ELEV. 8.0' STA 672-1.13 87 Q FEET 9 ;VEL TO fX7577NG- - M EDGE OF S.W A ` g BR/DGE TO STA. S.W. 16th BRIDGE 00 NOT DISTURB 7 '�' .�, \► : PT CUR x VO SEE DETAIL A {E LOW F W. , � SHEET STA 67 0.05� V / �q EXIS77NG 12•P/PE V 1 � �' 1 SEE DETAIL 6 SHEET (N EX/SANG 30'P/r'£ TO ••�j"y�... {, �. .,, - - -; � „n _ -�.:. .fit,. ram. ... � . .c �.. - -`"'f�±."`•-r�'ir�'}�;-���-�.. .."�aL� ;ri^.... �.YF'•+`"'�y ... .. ,�' ... '- <3,+1-._ �f...> :s;,�iQ.r yi ►•..�'� �,i45! ... ., �•-d• Yr•L..Y`ua_ '3. �••. '.1. •+• , .. ....�..—r.. 1 OA TA CURVE #2 OA TA CHANNEL it LOW FLOW 1J74.10' n — 1J74'10' 147916' O - 19V555' 400.00' R - J02 00' 8285' T- 62.IJ' / /.•' 16JJ8 L - 122.54' RINGBRod` • // SP CREEK / q• IEX/POR e MAY BE 1FtANS(710iV SLOPE.W 15• ^,` Y IPW ENO.dF ;�! WI WALL � .4'• .;tip}'••. __� ,W_CHA EL N'1 5' CHANNEL t�i F d 1 t+••" �STA'6i nD _ PT CURD 1 :5a C/ ED �. CHANNEL - 7.15 •• con +. � ..... STA 67Jh7 12' 0 1 tJ t v 7RANS/7701V WALL SEE SHEET 11 -To Sv l 00 At NC RETAINING WALL T 00 NOT O/SR/RB NOTE No representatA KSOA ,5; W. thepubse ar w;7gs LE A t/E. o these dmwinys QA utilities are p- are shown, the approximate. Ih O c &CNO FROM £XISDNG SLOPE :••. \� ' s.. . -HA PT CL/R',F J v,`•ti TRANS/DON SLOPE TOPS O y Rt_ 7s 18 '' TO END OF ►HNGWALL _ �. N � s '. SH££T 0 7FMPOR,4RY SHORING . - MA.Y BE N££OED /N 0 C i 7H,S AREA WItJGW ..- ••. '•.•. ' ''SEE 10 ': ' x. ' "� W OHNN AN STA: 67•tJO. LOW od• W +' N J3.2O 6 0 .WZ GC£POINT N �• ZO, 6 I v6+9 , • ('.CHANNEL.. 5 lO.. CHAN.NEL STA 676t90.J7. _ S££OETA/L A 1 THIS 51JEET �� I EA7S771VG 18'PIPE EXIS171VG 1RANS/770N WALL EX/SDNG RETAINING WALL NQ� �B 00 NOT OIS7UR6 00 NOT OiS7uRB NO re " pub/ic . nn --------- -------- ---._-._-_---- -- these V' �� � ` �� /O�of � �1.��/�o`�-�• �� C.IYI�/G�' f�/'«��' � � � l f- � x � 13�¢S �fz _ �ds� �� i cOMPU7ATION SHEE7 L'. S. DEPA.RTINIENT OF AGRICULTURE SCtL CONSERVATION SERVICE arc "f S TA TE F C _WASH_jN6rT'ort _ ��CTR coNN�C.7INCT GHA. NNlr--IL -------- BY JF.TE CHECKED BY ;SATE SOB NQ SU&JEC' , GONGR.�TE QVIANT IT1ES - SHEEJ _1__ OF_ �O i I i I I i , I .0 ' 442 Jr 35' XI 1 1 i 0.973 2- L�•R�� w�NCrwALL.s � ;� SkC.TI.Oi�I71 t L 023) $ 349. 42.5 , I ' i O'S, ' 1 G . 5, O FT CT it r •n I "1 . 33 0 os A k f, s tit 3 I U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE rc SOr1_ CONSERVATIC'w SERVICE 7 F ;£ PRO—'EC -- WA�SktNC�Td � . S- G. R CoNN�GTING Gi- AWNE'L ;DATE CNFC'KE BY if�ATE • GGH i 5-24-93 ---- u Go►vrTF--_ _-a-UaN.T► t)a - ------- --- --- - NEST OF, tqt t t: I ;--4 SEG.T I ON I 1- -- 4t i' -- -�-- $1 2�.4' 14,0033'x. ! . 1 ' 1 i 33�._ T 1 I vl+ii+�+:!tyi,syaya, 'aS?i++.ef?! !Ss �: �.• �" .+.� ''�'�' :: T s 6 _�_ -Y-•- -'�--f__-.- t_- I _- 7-1 V . i i REINFORCING STEEL COMPUTATION SHEET JOB : P-1 CONNECTING CHANNEL COMPUTED BY : C.HOUSTON STATE: WASHINGTON DATE : 05/25/93 COUNTY : fQNG CHECKED BY : B.DALLAS STRUCTURE : 20'WINGWALL DATE : os/01/93 REFERENCE: SHEET; 1 OF 1 A B C LENGTH TOTAL LOCATION MAR QUAN SIZE TYP FT IN FT IN FT IN FT IN FT IN POUNDS UNEXP.&BTM 1 15 6 21 13 7 2 0 15 7 233 9 351.09 UNEXP 2 14 5 ST 19 1 19 1 267 2 278.65 UNEXP.&BTM 3 14 6 21 6 0 2 O 8 O 112 0 168.22 UNEXP.&BTIVI 4 29 5 21 3 0 2 0 5 0 145 0 151.24 TOP 5 9 6 ST 18 11 181 11 170 3 255.72 EXP 6 21 5 21 13 7 2 0 15 7 327 3 341.32 TOP 7 2 6 ST 19 8 19 8 39 4 59.08 TOP 8 15 6 ST 19 6 19 6 292 a 439.34 BTM 9 9 5 ST 18 11 18 11 170 3 177.57 BTM&TOP 10 2 7 ST l 9 1 9 3 6 7.15 BTM&TOP 11 2 7 ST 2 5 2 5 4 10 9.88 BTM 12 2 5 ST 19 8 19 8 39 4 41.02 BTM 13 1 5 ST 19 6 19 6 19 6 20.34 BTM&TOP 14 78 7 ST 10 8 10 8 832 0 1700.61 ..................... ..................... . TOTAL- .......... .. R R ft REINFORCING STEEL COMPUTATION SHEET JOB STATE DATE COMPUTED BY OWNER COUNTY DATE CHECKED BY STRUCTURE PLAN REFERENCE NO. SHEET B C L G —TOTAL MARK LOCATION QUAN SIZJTYPE-FT IN FT IN FT IN FT IN FT IN POUNDS !. UNEXP. T. K�-LXJ2 15 1 2 O - I 235 O 52.��0 _ 14 5 i� -7 �1 _ d 2 5 CI S3 I N�XP. / -T F _ �o 2- b 1 2 22 4 U N�x P /-Fo-r. rx' Z z l 3 0 0 14 s` t 0 C x . /-r F Loo P- 6 S T I q 6� ;->-P / T 1=�OC) .- - 5 zl 13 8 IS =3 3 3 �t �r 807 ExP. ToP F K 2 (o ST 9 7 t ci 7 39 Z 9.13 2 8 ExP /T P �--LOOV I S T I D I f r3 i Q 2 qo q a>e,P ToP U)"''yA ; -T I Pi ST " j 1" a 3S F, Gol -tops!INcX'P/ - a -I S T' I I 7 sT 2) ExP-%T +� utiiEx? /BoT 2 ST q 3 2 0 5 113 UN xP. goT. pro ST 10 l 0, l !O a i • TOTAL- REINFORCING STEEL COMPUTATION SHEET is JOB : P-1 CONNECTING CHANNEL COMPUTED BY: C.HOUSTON STATE: WASHINGTON DATE: 05/25/93 COUNTY: 19NG CHECKED BY: B.DALLAS STRUCTURE: 40'WINGWALL DATE : os/01/93 REFERENCE : SHEET: 1 OF 1 A B C LENGTH TOTAL LOCATION MAR QUAN SIZE TYP FT IN FT IN FT IN FT IN FT IN POUNDS UNEXP.&BTM 1 30 6 21 13 7 2 0 15 7 467 6 70219 UNEXP 2 14 5 ST 39 1 39 1 547 2 570.69 UNEXP.&BTM 3 29 6 21 6 0 2 0 8 0 232 0 348.46 UNEXP.&BTM 4 59 5 21 3 0 2 0 5 0 295 0 307.69 TOP 5 9 6 ST 38 11 38 11 350 3 526.06 EXP 6 41 5 21 13 7 2 0 15 7 638 11 666.39 TOP 7 2 6 ST 39 8 39 8 79 4 119.16 TOP 8 15 8 ST 39 6 39 6 592 8 889.94 BTM 9 9 5 ST 38 11 38 11 350 3 365.31 BTM&TOP 10 2 7 ST 1 9 1 9 3 6 7.15 BTM&TOP 11 2 7 ST 2 5 2 5 4 10 9.88 BTM 12 2 5 ST 39 8 39 8 79 4 8274 STM 13 1 5 ST 39 6 39 6 39 6 41.20 BTM&TOP 14 118 7 ST 10 8 10 8 1258 8 257271 ..................... TOTAL— 72Q9:v9 : RE_ INFORC_I_N_ STEEL COMPUTATION SHEET JOB STATE DATE COMPUTED BY ESGR CONNEGTIPE� CNAW , L WAISHItJ&TONI CG�-1 OWNER COUNTY DATE CHECKED BY STRUCTURE i� PLAN REFERENCE NO. SHEET �vleJ Uwat_�- - 40 A 1 C LENGl'H TOTAL MARK LOCATION QUA_N SIZE TYPE FT IN FT_ IN F_T IN FT IN FT IN POUNDS ExP E�CF i/80T. FLOG^ .2 F 2 I 13 8 1 O IS �5�1 4-7-7. qSR s U N 7. F-LODR I Lf5 ST q a U N ESP./> r Long_ 6 I O Z 3 4< < 4 XP /. OT" + OR. 5 6 2 D 5 c P/To Ft ooF 6 ST . 1" 20. ExP/�pp 5 2 1 i Z. 6 EX? TD 2 3 a-7 qO 8 ExP TON/v NE-c BtlT I O 5 30 VE—A L1 X �T !8UNEK�30T 7r o OT -7 ST I T-ro 1 S q l 3 t 3 . TOTAL- - �t0'-O w►r�I �WA,LLS COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev- 8-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE VIA PROJECT BY T DATE CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. • SUBJECT L�L�NT GG�s� L(Ar,JTt T� SHEET / OF All h t "7, (7,)( .AT= 3Co•co lb.o a7 a i �-.+!5e+:r.>rs�;rM:•n . a;' �+r<L?il' : +S q' ate,+ ' +'' .v '"t._?tii?' ? 4 �+�'17(.,: • :3 % e �7y� 27 - 1 3 9, d Ilt G�kLk 139.n � t42 •� = ZSt. 9 �� I COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGR/CUL7URE- SC5-ENG-523A Rem. 9-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE BY DATE 6 CHECKED BY `DArE JOB NO. - -- 3: SUBJECT oph I�TCYZ SHEET OF F'i�-rEYZ I I , i , i I ---------- - 3 i — -� -+- - - pt IDS ''-- - r- +IRy''. '+f Ii .h'. K c •i+`+ �'*t .�. .•t�. .t �'✓ -2nt tYi?'rJ'�2 S SRC +,>;>fG � P ,i� �.. , r , 4 -•_ �4- YD3 R►�t?a + : : c� - t— i l � -, —s ---L---�� —4 i EARTHWORK COMPUTATION SHEET JOB : ESGR Connect. Channel COMPUTED : B. DALLAS STATE : WASHINGTON DATE : 05/18/93 COUNTY: RING CHECKED : SPONSOR : DATE : ITEM : RIPRAP 11.► Lu pEs F 1 LTea-_ SHEET: 1 AREA AVE OF DIST. VOL VOL STATION SO FT END AREA FT CU FT CU YD REMARKS 67076.00 0.00 67076.00 56.86 28.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 67115.24 91.22 74.04 �i9.24 2905.33 107.60 67173.24 91.22 91.22 8.00 5290.76 195.95 67190.32 109.43 100.33 17.08 1713.55 63.46 67198.46 109.43 109.43 8.14 890.76 32.99 67198.46 49.11 79.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 67240.90 49.20 49.16 2.44 2086.14 77.26 67270.56 44.44 46.82 9.66 1388.68 51.43 67291.10 44.82 44.63 20.54 916.70 33.95 67316.28 46.67 45.75 25.18 1151.86 42.66 67342.85 49.17 47.92 26.57 1273.23 47.16 67465.93 49.16 49.17 123.08 6051.23 224.12 67476.04 49.16 49.16 10.11 497.01 18.41 67476.04 83.23 66.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 67484.68 69.58 76.41 18.64 660.14 24.45 67499.53 7.51 38.55 14.85 572.39 21.20 67507.18 0.00 3.76 7.65 28.73 1.06 67659.15 0.00 0.00 1�1.97 0.00 0.00 67673.18 0.00 0.00 14.03 0.00 0.00 67680.84 36.62 18.31 7.66 140.25 5.19 67698.65 59.28 47.95 17.81 853.99 31.63 67712.68 49.53 54.41 14.03 763.30 28.27 67762.90 49.19 49.36 50.22 2478.86 91.81 67762.90 158.66 103.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 67805.37 159.80 159.23 �2.47 6762.50 250.46 67809.87 160.15 159.98 4.50 719.89 26.66 67824.72 68.37 114.26 ;4.85 1696.76 62.84 67830.72 0.00 34.19 6.00 205.11 7.60 ................... TOTAL = 14.4:6: 19 : CUBIC YARDS ................... ................... 113 l � ' z (D3 Arz A Oil► 1Nwt- HA F-L. Z1 l 8 t {p o L i EARTHWORK COMPUTATION SHEET JOB : ESGR CONNECTING CHANNEL COMPUTED : C. HOUSTON STATE : WASHINGTON DATE : 06/01/93 COUNTY : RING CHECKED : SPONSOR : DATE : _ ITEM : FILTER QUANTITIES SHEET: 1_ AREA AVE OF DIST. VOL VOL STATION SO FT END AREA FT CU FT CU YD REMARKS 67076.00 21.70 67115.24 34.87 28.29 39.24 1109.90 41.11 67173.24 34.87 34.87 58.00 2022.46 74.91 67190.32 35.65 35.26 17.08 602.24 22.31 67190.32 35.65 35.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 67198.46 35.65 35.65 8.14 290.19 10.75 67198.46 21.70 28.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 67240.90 20.15 20.93 42.44 888.06 32.89 67270.56 17.82 18.99 29.66 563.10 20.86 67291.10 17.05 17.44 20.54 358.11 13.26 67316.28 18.60 17.83 25.18 448.83 16.62 67342.85 20.93 19.77 26.57 525.16 19.45 67465.93 19.76 20.35 123.08 2504.06 92.74 67476.04 19.76 19.76 10.11 199.77 7.40 67476.04 40.30 30.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 67484.68 24.80 32.55 8.64 281.23 10.42 67499.53 1.55 13.18 14.85 195.65 7.25 67507.18 0.00 0.78 7.65 5.93 0.22 67673.18 12.40 6.20 166.00 1029.20 38.12 67680.84 10.85 11.63 7.66 89.05 3.30 67698.65 18.60 14.73 17.81 262.25 9.71 67712.68 19.12 18.86 14.03 264.61 9.80 67762.90 18.60 18.86 50.22 947.15 35.08 67762.90 60.45 39.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 67805.37 58.90 59.68 42.47 2534.40 93.87 67805.37 58.90 58.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 67809.87 60.45 59.68 4.50 268.54 9.95 67824.72 25.19 42.82 14.85 635.88 23.55 67830.72 0.00 12.60 6.00 75.57 2.80 .................. TOTAL = 5St6: 5: CUBIC YARDS ................... COMPUTAT/ON SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CS--ENG-523A Re•: >-69 SOIL CONSERV_gTION SERVICE - -- - - - �R Jc T By DATE �9 CHECK D BY 'DATE JOB NO. _ _ _---- -- SUBJECT� //,,„ �S{QN_G-tj 1ST'{T1E3 SHEET OF 77 -- - '- - - �A^✓s4+f�l�'. .rti. f�1- 'A'1; •� ., 1 i s.i C:. J 4M �,Oipr,�.,fir, , a i �---r- f I � • - _ L i : _ - _ - r- I WA,SHING-ToN F-S&-R- CEONN—=GTl,,tC-r c GGN -- - '°� UprNTxGELStd2 Bt..At1�1K1'_ _ or F1NID : St,IQ. G� P�ZSAQ To ELEVA, � L O►� FOR. EXCE-A S I OR- Bt_A,,Nt-eT -X S�E KT`rA�c�HF-D 5Ht e-rs r-OIZ A-?-F,As LA BELS D © THRU(9) GAL C U LP-.-T I ONs 4 5LOPE 3= 1 - AREA 097AINEP ��,�-Toc�-_ �•c�s4 By us1N G 1 .86 i r,2 3. 16 Z3 1,054 3 3 O ':VM/�/i{!�►LLfh•: -'.Y'M�+�.. h' ...i. .. _{'•._ 2.,. •�:> 1. j. .- 1 .4vK� 't ��.-:-Y.':kt..e�l:r�r • ® SLO P'E = O � 4._f->` �TZ O CP�.SSUME SLOPE = O 4* SGALC = 1"-. 40' UNLESS S7,&,TeD OrTH vvtSe) (0,4, ih2) ( 4o -752,0fT2- ® SLOPE = 3: 1 (3.53 2) ft Z1.OS4) = 5953.o w--TZ 05 4 (40 r� \ th! ® SLOPE = S O: I 0002-) • _ ( th 50 5o.o t = I, 000Z F-T z '5 0 SNINCTTT)I\J ES&R rl- ONNIECT6M'7- ONANNF--L �ulZ��c..� ��-E� �-��Gv��T►DNS CCot�JT� ® SLOPE = Sp• I _ f���A = �1�Sp ►'ri� �� 2 � � O�D2 = Z40a.4� �TZ ►nr 2.641 40ftJ2 I� 3.30 iv, 4p-�# Z = 52 30 PT2- ® 5Lopa - sO= l �1 . �I tn2VLO Z l � 00O2� 'v3'jiy�t!{!�G,i?tiCti ¢e -~�h�+�'��iftiyitS�sa�.Li� if^!`WrJ:r:{.:.MGM".r�etab:f�(+t.i.(I:Anti{i.S�,S.,¢rea�•a'. ja-vc�w'ii�WG.°'!"�'R Y4i+t4tw;i.-r c .n.+t��:r.cr n:u .+ •.. 2-576. SI mil'z 3► 311 . 00 424b, 00 - 52.00 qq. 2.0 sg53. 00 I b 2 2. .00 2400. 4-2 42 4 - o0 52 O •00 S1 �St0 , 10 �7-T2 _ / POINT NAME NORTHING EA577NG CU ,yl DATA CUR{F 3' 2 DATA j (Y> N HANNEL jE LOW FLOW MONUMENT(SW 16TH STJ 17,,156.66 1,654,125.67 2J24 10` ° = 2J74'10" C STA 670t31 173,044.28 1,654,20J.26 147926' 0 — 79i7555' f STA 671 t 44.J5 173,157.11 1,654,192.68 400.00' R = J00 00' / PC CURhEZ1 STA 671+13.87 173,226.35 1,654,186.19 82.85 T= 62.13' PT CURVE/1 STA 673+77.25 17JJ81.47 1,654,1J8.60 1 16JJ8' L = 122.54' l C STA 674*91.37 7J,481.50 1,654,O8J.70 PC CUR hTf2 STA 671 t 77.51 �17.i 190.41 1,654,201.by / / PT CURVE,y2 STA 67J+00 05 17J J06.74 1,654,165 92 MONUMENT 10 ' BROOK SPRI REEK \ v f 'aG 0 8.6' .TEMP /�f,ti!• \ ,� \ �� /E SIN 48 / a MAY, "PIPE \ \ \ (fr �V1Ap P, 0,/ o TRANS/710N SLOPE. 15 W1NCWALL* I -10 d .................... ............. :...... ... .' .' STA:" ' }CHANNEL Mj f T : SW 16th BRIDGE 00 NOT DISTURB SEE DETAIL A R SHEET L \ TRANS/7101V WALL SEE SHEET 12 EX/STING 12`PIPE 1 EX/S77NC RETAIN/NC WALL SEE DETAIL B PDO NOT D157URB (g EX/S7WO 30`PIPE SHEET NOTE.' No represents public or privy LOGATI C'►J 5 These dra p SHADEp T'[ utilities aree pr T �/ 11 'Q� /� re shorn, the / Q� l�G� S 1 PL.�'11 V f�� PProximcte_/� ..- ..i vJ _.....A......_.�-times..-... -w..-� ..♦ __.- w.Y��.\........ .v...__.-. .�.-.r. -. _ ... _.....�......._ �I II _ s l7 �� z c BLEND FROM EX/STING SLOPE : . - ;- • 'rho;:. •. � .. PC CURVE J '� Rt. .d5.05 Pr CG'RVE J 7RANS1770N SLOPE 1 ' ••'' ...• Rt. 74.2E •. • •' FO END OF WNGWALL ...., ANS1770 _ A' -.PC.CU/?�E SLOPE - WPIGW SEE SHEET. p• 5� �/ `D�D >�1`� TEMPORARY SHORING A!A-Y 8E NEEDED IN H .• 15.0` G•V 1N/S AREA Rt.'JO•,00 .�r0� .� WINGWALL g SEE SHEET 10 o� CN�NN�, 5rA see+7o. ems. W p N 33 Z o c r. . GLE Po/NT. — N 33 ,�•. a .. Law - W 0' 1T 67 t9 .J7 SEE DETAIL A ' 0' 1 1N/S SHEET 1 �EX/SANG 18'PIPE EXIS IG 7RAN511101V WAL EXIS77NG RETAINING WALL N01 '_A9 DO O r OlS7UR9 OO NOT DISTUR9 No ra Q public these COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE "SCS-ENG-523A Rey. 9-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE +00 196Y O--J61iJY STATE PROJECT WA5gttJGTON _ SGR, GON NEGT t N& CHANNEL a Gv ---rDA E _w :CHECKS BY DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT y f 0";9 F { L L SHEET ` OIF -� 4 , ! j AL ; ;; 1 1 lZ. • .� f 1 Yl j_ � I 1- j FT% 1- L Z = -SW6 !AZ Z r 771 i i 1/ 3 ; 1 32 t --+- 4 - - i- COMPUTAT;ON SHEET U- S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE sa SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE •�po 1969 0—364-'00 ETA r� PROJEcr G4 N NEC.T IN fr CHAtO NE g y rD T CHECKED 8Y i DATE JOB NO_ _ GCs H '1 SUBJ t L SHEET OF 1 ' I 1 I ' 1 � I i , 1. 4 � i r , r I , i 1 i i , •I r i 1111 • r r II , r i I T j ' 1 : I i I I - - - i � -�- • COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE WAS HINFO0 l- ---- -- --'-- ESGR GONNE.GTiNG CA4ANNEL.-----'--- ar GGH D''5-26-93 CFlsc 3y DATE —JOB NO. SUSJEC wlr;' ILL. - - THEET---.�- OF r A ` t � -- YO 1 s�Nt ' - --- ►yobLi- -- - ` —` — i Zo 12 - ; -t--�-, � DTA '`3 1 - 1 I 1 r ' +��- • • ✓ ' —� —�--.ram._ M V V� 1 + ' e� r ; 1 Y � .1 n, i 'tm c•. •sR .r K .+r i •. .>•e. �:�• .,rtv w;.Y s�. 1 a F'� fi `T Z . 2 Z . �1 I � I r �q2b 4- 4 p 1 r ir ' I r , f . f r ' — T t f I i i �— t t , ' i 4 , COMPUTATION .SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CO-43EQv4T10rV SEP!/ICE STA TE 'Eat - — - PFtO� -1LvS�t I NGT(7N �_SGR, GoN N E GT r N BY G G H i D 6j E CHECK D BY --- DA T.- - JO -. . - .. _ JOB NO. - SUBJECT -- -_--_ SHEET 4 OF 'T + y , ... .4rtt'.,� •r OEir li":n:. •"� �r( �'� �' tdt .t E{' i+t: �'r$. %r^a E!4�f"4t'S'AA+rT4ii r 1 t I f i i { I j : - - - _ r , I r COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS—ENG-523 Rev. "9 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE � PROJECT ./�. Chi I1✓rcQ BY DA� CHECKED BY DATE JO NO.ID SUBJECT SHEET / OF R1 d Me w!►or a vi'e.. : i fie+ k:.;>✓> -:t. ,t:.>w;q., h>.;rn t, .;tC.;. .:.,st.•,�:t,.L;3�. t�.yaDs'i,. lYtit.} t'�y av� c`. �+♦ !�t i (�ts4w,c4 '��i}'LL•*rj�LaYL'Rh'N1voFt`�'T� kL�fn1�Strts* a , ` I38 (/-(-7`)= Zoo f 4 biz- 40,) _ 13► + �o-7 T ta2 a = 7ZZcP'f4-- 803 s7 Aree4. not ov, storms �ofi;rt9 + s}�,p - zgc> ' C 1,4-7') = 467 f+- - _ �Z sY COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rw. 8--69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE PROJECT A 9�Z P-l nnee, BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE B NO. ` SUBJECT SHEET Z OF QZ Z14 B�Z7�) t �� C 98z� t �� 98Z�r�1 az 35to4 + 41! 8 f Y 75 Z SLC�PED A(Z.Eh - _ a'3 ' /Z (o / C 3o Z2:5. -f- 17 Z. 4 `— a3 -ro��G -r'' i"^..r.:.i:%ZT:"{.jc's�+J* ''.4'..'�2*'.v''Ezf;3x'ad•.'d•3v`kL'?n!`it'rR?ez{J��tnl`fri•';•`*.+a 'k 'Ye:�Y`.'"_"Pc.:s. b 57.• --t.- 14 aTA L 7 )ti!E f p\/� L 1Z. CEI�K iN i rH Pc.a�/r N1�?r,rZ 7Z Do{�z. Sav 500 i EXISTING BOX CULVERT - E ISTING B ERT --_- 25 IMPERVI US A ------ EXISTING P-1 I --- --- ATTACH IMPERVIOUS MEMBRANE TO RAETAINING WALL AND TRANSITION WALL EXISTING TRANSITION WALL w / II EXISTING S.W. 16TH AVE BRIDGE 4titi TRANSITION WALL I 31tool\e9 fit {rJPERVIOU MEMBRANE / I ATTAC IMPERViOUS MEMBRANE TO EXISTING P-1 RE AIMING WALL RETAIN :G WALL AND TRANSITION IV;ALL I i I � COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPAR'r.MENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523A Re, 9-59 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE ;PROJECT YVAS H i N &T ON__ _ _ SSGr R- tom!N EGT t W& G u A N N E.L. BY �D ^� CHECKED BY �DAT- ------ ;OB NO. SUBJECT �mayy( ., G©NGR�TE UCLAAN�. -. SHEET_ --- t T i -. - I A T o Pq ' + ! a I ' Sq$ '= 378) 3 -r,A rl l 0 - - — Dt •�lait`•*'r' ".1. 1 -jar - '..al �� •) 1�� a•:y.i. Y •_ .. u .1•�4 K. O'ittl{L�tj c2llkA L , . t - - - - 2 _ 14. Ll Its 2 C + to d _ - ". T , f 1 4.5 I x- �q T w j t , COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-52.3A Rev 9-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE PROJECT _ WkSHN&TON -- _ �SGR GONNEGrtiNCr C.HANNj=-L _ BY Gu DAT� f�� CHECKED BY !DATE JOB NO. -- --- SUBJECT ` GONG 2E�E U A,"T T 1 -S I SHEET_ of . i , I '.�•,+c, •c•a�t fc°S yt•i Mai• �f'4 'Y�• !�'.�;sK: 'Pi M 4•Y:1 h^S•. 's4 Z '> �t' ;i'..�'a•tK.,,;,�v,;w ,l� i•i Y' `�•. ',. t•.1�• �lekiasi�',eSilt+!Lt 1 , - t f- . oll- s n r a 1 l . � I v i - , (_ X-- Tr _ ! ! r _ i ! p I r- � w WRSHIN&TON E5, G-IZ CO N ECT fN & 7-7 i -f �N i f i Cn { i s t t �— VI } i i i WASNIN&TON R COWNF_r,7rNG C -WN NEL G6N 6-l--g3 C-ONGRETE Q,(/ANTITiES-__7tZ4q4_I rloN S� s��Fr__ a -- - ------=-ram—=_.�--_ --- 2. 2 3. 1 z G 158 3 = 05. -T-1 FT' Z 4A 1, ZS 0- G,�;783 = 2-3 . q6 FT3 5 (� L 25 q 5x s 3 6 -7. 08 !r—T 3 - i i 2 ► 2 - .583 Zb 35 z I-b7) CS13]_ 44 2- rT3 Z ��• a s' 3. 12 fir- R.58 3) _ &S T7 ToTA� q02, 2I �:V w w w oo w oo °° v m m w W, m w ao of rr m c 0 m000 mmmvo 0,0 A !J N -W' O (0 W V N A W N O cp OD V O/ On A W N O t0 00 V W On A W N m n' O N z ZAS r L7 Ut (T (Ji Cr 07 L7 Ln Oa W L7 L7 (T 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 � L r � W A Q) N N A too L7 V w V O O (T 0 O 0 0 O y A A V O W N V W V A O 0 A O 0 A O Z ` O O O O — O N O N A �{ � O O) (» W CO OJ W 0) O O tp W Z N G n = 0 Of W A A N� n C (0 W OD N N A N V W 0 = m D v D v O v r V 01 O A (0 (T Qf N W OI N O W N N A 0'f 0 O O A 0 0 W O N O S 0 O O V O 0 O N A O W O O O N W O A 0 O A OD O Z O y�y Nv tNp tNp pffi p ' W (Np NN�' to p oo ro p ��ii a So S� qNq ��p o.pp,, �o Appo qoq REINFORCING STEEL COMPUTATION SHEET JOB : P-1 CONNECTING CHANNEL COMPUTED BY : B.DALLAs STATE : WASHINGTON DATE : o4/14/93 COUNTY: KING CHECKED BY: C?-r, STRUCTURE : TRANSITION SLAB DATE : 6 - 1 -13 REFERENCE : SHEET 13 OF DRAWINGS SHEET: 1 OF 1 A B C LENGTH TOTAL LOCATION MARK QUAN SIZE TYP FT IN FT IN FT IN FT IN FT IN POUNDS _ BTM 50 10 6 ST 12 10 12 10 128 4 19276 LOW FLOW 51 10 6 3 12 10 7 6 3 O 23 4 233 4 350.47 BTM 52 30 6 ST 20 0 20 0 600 0 901.20 BTM&TOP 53 10 6 ST 4 4 4 4 43 4 65.09 BTM&TOP 54 129 6 ST 9 2 9 2 1182 8 1776.12 BTM&TOP 55 2 6 ST 9 3 9 3 18 6 27.79 TOP 56 2 6 ST 9 7 9 7 19 2 28.79 TOP 57 to 6 21 12 10 2 9 15 7 155 10 234.06 TOP 58 10 6 ST 7 3 7 3 72 6 108.90 TOP 59 10 6 21 17 3 2 9 20 0 200 0 300.40 TOP 60 10 6 ST 7 1 7 1 70 10 106.39 TOP 61 40 6 17 2 8 2 9 5 5 54 2 81.36 ..................... TOTAL- :.:. 41� :3i:: EARTHWORK COMPUTATION SHEET JOB : ESGR Connect. Channel COMPUTED : B. DALLAS STATE : WASHINGTON DATE : 05/18/93 COUNTY : ICING CHECKED : SPONSOR : DATE : ITEM : PVC EXCAVATION AND EARTHFILL SHEET: 1 AREA AVE OF DIST. VOL VOL STATION SO FT END AREA FT CU FT CU YD REMARKS 67198.46 0.00 67198.46 333.60 166.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 67240.90 330.27 331.94 42.44 14087.32 521.75 67270.56 331.22 330.75 29.66 9809.90 363.33 67291.10 324.72 327.97 20.54 6736.50 249.50 67316.28 312.72 316 .72 25.18 8025.37 297.24 67342.85 319.53 316 .13 26.57 8399.44 311.09 67465.93 334.98 327.26 123.08 40278.55 1491.80 67476.04 296.49 315.74 10.11 3192.08 118.23 67476.04 284.90 29C.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 67484.68 147.11 216 .01 8.64 1866.28 69.12 67499.53 0.00 73 .56 14.85 1092.29 40.46 67507.18 0.00 0 .00 7.65 0.00 0.00 67659.15 0.00 C.00 151.97 0.00 0.00 67673.18 108.78 54.39 14.03 763.09 28.26 67680.84 162.63 135.71 7.66 1039.50 38.50 . 67698.65 356.81 259 .72 17.81 4625.61 171.32 67712.68 346.96 351 .89 14.03 4936.95 182.85 67762.90 373.30 36C .13 50.22 18085.73 669.84 67762.90 330.16 351 .73 0.00 0.00 0.00 67805.37 329.65 329 .91 42.47 14011.07 518.93 67805.37 0.00 164.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 ................... TOTAL = 507 : :2_]:`.:':CUBIC YARDS ................... ................... COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS—ENG-523 Rev. 8-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE PROJECT BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT S SHEET OF �xc,a rla�iQrl � Commoh uJ�i f cost Pox& /-t Grady IA/,t/ Gon 7'1e e 1.40 )1u5� �. SolejJ// — f t+w'i!:i r � �- ' c c ti c �4�i. ..4 +'-�Ctis :Af�c stibp �•i � � +na .s a r �1.•. ti, ,�`I! �,� ... s - �oc� Ave, GoSf = Zl• 07 IT Gl 5e �Z o . oo IT COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS—ENG-523 Rev. "9 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE n PROJECT T7 56fZ Cam I� G l4A ram, BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. 5�93 SUBJECT p/ vL ��/7 er O � SHEET OF u�1)7- �o sT3 �o ,�� / P✓G 1��� o. 30 l ft 11 I Qvp�r�r)Es _ � N6�c:,.w:aR�.�±;S�:p,.y.,r �+,�,.,�.ti:k�ai,t' ��=��i+nis+r+'�i4.� �3���'��c.�.r'S���,+f?� s�e'�i'' ' _ :� .e:i��•• h cs.•t• �'r tati'sK.+.i:rw ,¢tfQt�Gl,n��t/����ll = 51O0 ff cows 2-0) Z- -3 = 8, 09l0. Do 5(o D><f l 7) �Szv,00 (�enerac.e - 3, 000 ,no ZS O Ca/?ti 4cfor 0/7/ Z� ]7D, o 0 ZS' 7 7O/27 7-4 s r = � r ` COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS—ENG-523 Rev. "g SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE PROJECT WIQ E5e7/r- Gonncc fry Lhanllc/ BY DATE 54 CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. mz r' SUBJECT GOIj SHEET OF Go k?po yie n 7' .8 0 i �G110 Zg il,� /•l7C�5 � /DD �� /46r�y Zd hr5 rk:�:•i�ic�+.U:Ljyi;ic.S.c:iLtKioS:v.✓,.hi�t�47.i►Lc*�r+t.�-:ziSii',,..(tr�<i�tao.�+..:,�:`.:- a<.t.�ei:+i�t�' •StWKK'!S� .,, ,aw+c�• t3- n n•t> .>..^. .•r ti•,*.• Ga.bl� t�t�5� Gianduid�'� = `�vo ad T Tg ` l 9 b o e�c D x Z fiucl� _ Z q Zo eanf f=' ot-/ , �v� 3�5a SC,I�EDJ�-�- `- 1►.1St'�rtowl 1�i_-►'s+.� a • .��__ _._._._._.v.�..,...�..�......�...�..._....._.......,.r f _...___...... .. SEE SEPARATE SPECIFICATION SECTION c�— v���",'t,., �. .,, �1 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER WATERSHED P-1 CHANNEL, STATION 670+31 to TO STATION 678+30.37 SCOPE This operation and maintenance plan is written for the P-1 channel from Sta 670+31 to Sta 678+30.37 as shown on sheet 3 & 4, Drawing No . ESGR-10. FUNDING Operation and maintenance of this segment of the P-1 channel will be performed by the City of Renton . They have been designated to perform all the required tasks and duties necessary for the operation and maintenance. Monies for operation and maintenance will be obtained as specified by RCW 8615. An annual budget for operation and maintenance of this segment is estimated at $ 500.00 per year. A contingency fund will be set aside to meet emergency or unusual expenditures . OPERATIONS PROGRAM The operations program for this segment of the P-1 channel shall consist of passing the flow of P-1 channel to the Green River in a non—erosive manner so that there is no threat or hazard to public health , safety , and/or property . MAINTENANCE PROGRAM The maintenance program for this segment of P-1 channel shall consist of performing such work that is necessary to be sure the works of improvement continue to function in the same manner as it does at the time of construction completion . This maintenance work shall be performed promptly, orderly , and in a regularly scheduled fashion . The following highlight specific items needing annual maintenance attention : 1 . Vegetation a. Replant, resod , or reseed trees , shrubs , and vegetative cover in areas containing poor stands or where erosion has taken place . Restoration of grass seeding areas over rock riprapped slopes need to be performed . ( If necessary restore eroded areas before revegetating .) b . Fertilize trees , shrubs , and vegetative areas as required to maintain a vigorous healthy stand . c . Remove noxious weeds from vegetative areas as required . Obseve local ordinances regarding spraying and burning. d . Prune , trim, and/or cut trees and shrubs as required to maintain the required hydraulic channel capacity and to prevent potential hazards . O&M PLAN Page 2 . y 2. P-1 Channel a. Remove sediment within the channel cross—sections and properly dispose of it outside the channel perimeter. Special attention will be given to the low—flow channel which is to be maintained clear of sediment and or other debris to insure a concentrated flow for fish passage . b . Remove and properly dispose of all extraneous debris . Repair erosion damage to channel banks . c . Replace , reinforce , or extend gabions where needed. d . Replace, reinforce , or extend riprap where needed . e . Keep access for maintenance and maintain travelways in useable condition . f . Rehabilitate damaged side inlets to channel . g . Inspect channel banks for flowing sand conditions and if found cover with graded filter and rock riprap in accordance with SCS requirements . PERMITS AND REGULATIONS All operations and maintenance work shall be performed in accordance with federal , state , county and /or local laws , requirements and ordinances . INSPECTIONS A timely inspection system will be established by the City of Renton for the works of improvement included in the segment. The inspection shall consist of a field review by one or more representatives of the City of Renton . The SCS will assist in making this inspection for the first 3 years after completion of construction . After each inspection a report will be prepared indicating , (1) findings of the inspection , (2) recommendations for corrective action , and (3) a schedule for corrective work . A followup report will be prepared when corrective work is completed . A copy of these reports will be forwarded by the city to the Soil Conservation Service , King County Field Office . Corrective action found necessary to be performed shall be completed in a timely fashion . The first inspection shall be performed three months after completion of this project segment. After the first inspection , they shall be performed at six months after completion and then annually thereafter. The annual inspection shall be performed during the first week in September. Additional inspections shall be made following storms producing unusually high runoff . LIFE OF PLAN This plan shall remain in effect for a period of 50 years from date of the 0&M agreeement. • �� s n f •d FINAL DESIGN REPORT - HYDRAULICS ESGR P- 1 CHANNEL STATION 670+76 TO 680+26 . 37 JUNE 1993 Final Design Report - Hydraulics Page 1 ESGR P-1 Channel , Sta 670+76 to Sta 680+26 . 37 June 1993 The basic hydraulic criteria for the P-1 channel as outlined in September 1983 was used for the hydraulics portion of this design. Currently the hydrology for this watershed is being studied by an engineering firm retained by the City of Renton. At the time of the writing of this report that hydrology has not been approved by the SCS and therefor will not be used as a hydraulic parameter . Several features of this design have changed from the original design. These changes were incorporated into the design hydraulics to determine their impact on the project . Changes to this reach of channel which are included in the P-1 channel hydraulics are as follows : 1 . Leave original channel under SR405 bridge . The Washington State Department of Fisheries (WDOF ) is responsible for issuing the Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) permit for the project and, as such, have recommended some of the features which have been incorporated into the design. The existing channel which runs to the west of the SR405 bridge will be left open. This will provide additional resident fish habitat and additional flood water storage . volume . Also , it will eliminate an area of wetland that would have been filled. Final Design Report - Hydraulics Page 2 ESGR P-1 Channel , Sta 670+76 to Sta 680+26 . 37 June 1993 In order to model this split flow condition using the WSP2 program each branch of the split channel was rated separately using identical cross sections for each run at that cross section where the two channels split . Discharge vs . area was plotted at the split cross section and those two discharges which correspond to an equal cross sectional area (and therefor equal water surface elevation) at the split section were the discharges for each branch. WSP2 was then ran again using the determined discharges to determine a velocity for each branch of the split (see hydraulic summaries for results ) . 2 . Change in the low flow channel depth and bottom width. In order to protect the channel invert from scour during a flood event and to maintain a concentrated flow in the low flow channel for fish passage as required by the ESGR Environmental Mitigation Program it was necessary to raise the channel invert 0. 5 feet and widen the low flow channel bottom width from 8 ' to 12 ' . Downstream of the Grady Way box culvert it has been observed that the channel bottom is inundated during low flows even while the pump plant is operating according to the operation and maintenance plan. Because of this channel bottom inundation it is impossible to establish willows at both sides of the low flow channel and grass growth on the channel invert . Final Design Report - Hydraulics Page 3 ESGR P-1 Channel , Sta 670+76 to Sta 680+26 . 37 June 1993 A water surface profile (TR61 ) run was made for the low flow channel using starting elevations of 0 . 0 ' and 2 .0 ' at the storage pond. These elevations are outlined in the operation and maintenance manual for the P-1 pump plant with elevation 0.0 ' being maintained 6 . 5 months and elevation 2.0 ' for 5 . 5 months . The WSP2 run indicates out of bank flow beginning just downstream of the Oaksdale bridge when the pond is at elevation 2 .0 ' ( see summary sheet ) . These computed water levels are consistent with observed water levels . With a change in the low flow channel bottom width from 8 ' to 12 ' and a change in the depth from 2 . 0 ' to 2 . 5 ' the channel cross sectional area is increased from 28. 0 square feet to 47 . 8 square feet . Another feature recommended by the WDOF is the incorporation of Large Organic Debris (LOD ) . LOD for this project consist of exposed logs , exposed root wads , rock clusters and small groins . To provide enough room for the installation of this fish habitat structure without choking the low flow channel a low flow bottom width of 12 ' is needed with the requirement that each • LOD component not extend past the low flow channel center line. Final Design Report - Hydraulics Page 4 ESGR P-1 Channel , Sta 670+76 to Sta 680+26 . 37 June 1993 According to the WSP2 runs this increase in channel cross section will contain the flows within the low flow channel banks allowing for concentrated low flows , willow planting on both sides of the LF channel , a good grass establishment on the channel invert and the incorporation of large organic debris . 3 . Gabon walls used for the channel bank. According to geology reports a channel side slope of 3 : 1 is needed on these soils . Because of right-of way, utility and hydraulic restrictions a 3: 1 slope in not feasible in ithe area just north of S.W. 16th St . To satisfy the above restrictions and provide an environmentally acceptable channel bank, a rock gabion wall will be used. The gabion wall will be "softened" in its appearance by offsetting the blocks , and topsoiling and seeding the flat offset areas . 4 . Effect of project on upstream water surface elevations . WSP2 was used to model base flows using with and without project conditions. These runs indicate no difference in the water surface elevation during base flow conditions upstream of the project with and without project . 5 . Water surface elevation at S . 180th ( S .W. 43rd) is predicted to be 13 . 5 feet during a 100 year storm event . • 5260000m N :j. �E Tql�'. B m At w hiett p hiett tc,r BM G, 313 Park PIT f L.Mari, Sc C-01 4A F, d ch MAP Lack. 5258 'o Golf Course Fr I? wage Stt Ld (0 t- 16 z 5257 V A neo�i Yl Track OR —�w T, �BM 129',7. 7- 27'30" x so Reservoir \i- w ! \ f / iN. 1� � I I l"� j 11 !I 5256 am Z I--T ♦ I 8 IL II BM aJ"i" Ip IGO 25 im'-ft 203 E/TS i S 1 D p- G z4=aW !c I V012 `pc"L) • K•E: �. q- ..o--g 3 (AYCIZAULICS SLAmmar•y a Pro Ge.aures I 3 T he 5C S Co ntP 4 is r Frog r4 m W i--e r 5 Lt r(Q ce Pro tC,'Jcs - 72 -(o/ WSP-Z eot,--,pt.&4-csr Pm,3roLn't w45 t.eLec� �o f-he c4annel. Cov�di'4-,cnS n -' he Ckctnnel was d esl'J ned based on t-tie. �r 1 O ea r- D isc cL L4,l t CoticJ�',Lrv.z Z. 25 year Dr'scActrrye Samx4ull - A5 ed Conrj,'�-I'cn C3. IQCrar L. iSekarcre - A3ect Cor,di+-ro �t ' W i+ C, �- a�a' r1' l ( 0. vId vt wart" o f� ►r'ee baar4S Them werc 4-wo caned rK,N c n ecr-cl, c f-Jie Ct tooV-4" des ron Cc era (Foss ')'r7 o de �,-emine +Its Ca rn 4-ro 1 I t h q C o tigr /'/-i o r c�i S 1►t f-ed be/o w �s Pta r D ISc,1.,a.rcie ?r o :.i t+-c, Q urneS 0�en2�:+dq u pIcek, 2. Oct C14 WO, t-(--,- Pror•les w ,'f-1, 01- +he r,�--d 'kc.ecl caps cr'�-y of 400 e.FS (,T4tcr +-ke Greer 2i���f reaGl~es caPac, {y. O i"1,4�,1r C o ri T i C1 c`✓mot'*'r C1 tom+S -Two o4-ker pro s were rug, as �7nIlow S ; t , C3ase Flow �ro��I� -b cAe- errn,'oe fhe d f-A occ ofi bu.�rc 4 � fir /crw �/Qw �fsG► Cl�a•,ae% (S-0 cis) 2, LatA.) Flow dur,',n4- Seq sah, gor deSr n o � r �-k P f_A «., C/O U.1 4, -G.! C/,q.,r/f' / rZ 0 cy, S� �A• r=7A•ST 510LT GI2Ee'N !2!t/e �t�a 'iQ�• C (-�y d r a tt E i c S — S u vr>m ct r o 4 Pro c e d ee rez z a.u. . X r A n q 4--i o ►~4 c C l c!o Sff a/ G a r►7z u l4b r c7 C, f'4 5 c C•)�$ . E"kc-Iasecl c( f C c 5•t/:� a rR f-e Ca rnlo cr 1-a r ru n S Q S l is fecl 6 ,r- w 1, ! C y ar- A-S - G ue• It — Pro C,• J�e No. f o h Rct �-,:�� Z P u-4-q r`e A 3 e d— Co pi c/ �o pi car `f-lr Zlro )4/.e s - - _-_ _ . �{.S 1�`sl�d j� � Q/r ��►/arc/ I _ �a{rngiQ�! p►:��a�y� O�s�� � Cd�d�'f-►ar Frew f fcy Nc. (y4eq�� 1 /Oa (yea K D iSGG,a✓9C Z a Pro r"% S 3 zs S- o s S 6 � 7 too �aclCw�{-ter 8 so P e-s Cr zs /7_ Z 13 Prey;IcS 1y — Fis� cl�Q��el ocs,�n -V k e C k a r n e � tn1 a S des _rn cl �v r rn g x , 1 n u ✓n a,r t-1. � ��q�+.�e i - � •o �ja s ��z� - �c� � i- Co,x��{.b.�� 2. VeJC4�-Cj C1ncks-11'et - ^.0 r-;,QS !o. D T i e vi ei e ! trra c 4 wog dc �� ifeo S Z cvA. K. �• 9 /sc1�'� I-�ydrcL4f,cs — uWM4r`f caf Pro ced44rt-s .� 3 Y �'tiE Wa�,r Sur�c� t�rw �,'(.� s from *'6�� <r✓�e� ,'der nf- UP.�{►'cgm � ✓C S. LtI. / a0 t'� Fr hnvC bc:;ah i�c I tc �acl i�vi rtport 1 Since *-i,d cjesrJ« Yes i--v,cC 4--row S Gvc u �-yrc�►rt v f-kf duoncal. The hydra� k�c Calc� tq �-,arcs eu�✓� rev �w�J by klenje// 5 i-Y r,e r 1'rt 15 9 t r i a r i-v re lca s t- o IC t'-s-j er g,ho! r3 v I`r,)tart an iLa / z i rnp q t -T e con4-fie o►zci ,'-/-iOns were -'o he-/ Cr crCc1 - E Ug. (--►'v)II df=� t '•O j up 4-o ! So t-h e) c, ti itA cv4S fhc Ie ve/ c { f-he Qc{,'Q c c•? t /a.,doc.,// A rc4 S and fHe level e r c e e cl-S f-hR 7kc I'e Year- A�. - G•� !t Ca nd ,'{ corat�a//Ec� }-G,e Cl�cxhn�cE cles ►6: r b��sed oh ��rtrtiSsib�e'_ 4leto�,` r'�c 4� r- Vary t%A4 a �ri 52 600w-N f! W7— T )S A a Ji )Ilrh—lefic ub BA u G. L j 11 V 0 01 RA PIT % 32 S r'oW IS MN FWE d _7 52 4 58 aa B Gol f Course z:1 I �ewage 7 in 01-1 Ilk 'K IY3� SS Op ,SS 6 1 LongacreS CO) T nk rack K k Ii;BM I. 41i 4 7 6C .2730" Reservoir Sim 5256 < z XI !r M. I Sim i ABM % IGO tat 25 x3 0 29 Cb x 203 �K IIAO \\ : \* , . _j: (A "DRAvLiCS — u,rr,mar�/ o �roGedur�M 3 T. PkoseDu2d 1JS�D The 5CS Compu �ar Pr-o� ram W -Lf-er SL( r �Qce Pro g','/�S - T2 -!o( 1 UJSP-2, eom�t,4,ar ?M,3 o-rn was kleci /-o -:Iesl�ei f le GAanne/, v �'ti�. GG��tnne. l was 0 c� e.st'cred bRsed en f'tie Ct1d �{-r'ov. S A-s -S to r f t• Co 4d., 7L�P•z �. 25 year Ba,144ud - A5ed i �- 0.vti d -t- l' t ( Gt el ct v I 3 o w�rr-- a coed r'i-roi,, S rKn o r-t ectcL. o a �oV des n Co,•rSidlEro t-ipO5 .� Order fo de- �,O-em:ne `f'l.�� CaM 4-ro t I i Yl Coyd /�t-io � S ��t f Cd below : n � uS M P1Gtr, . 2. r � cicwat �r Pro �� le5 w ,'f-1, pL4k!,05 olzerrR�-is:� 07- } Me r`edkcecl eapacr' �-y 61C 400 GFS- a4�-cr +-1,� Grier 2i�1or reaG(~es CaPac�' �y. Two oi-ker pro were run as { /lows ; C4� 1 �fi buhK aw /ow >Cr'S� Gl�<t•risC /� Flow cl �A r i,,,q -}-i 5 �+ S CQ ,S O h f o c S �a? n o TL �'�tP f_ /� �:.► t- C/,gs�rJrF' � �2o G7'S) (-(ydraLktiCS — Suv»rnayry Proccclu✓es z 3 a Ckrlckr)CL4--ion c 1� vsCl0Sr t--/a t'4 Sl�eC1�'S . E l-\c l a n ect c( r f 4v AS li'sfed 6e/aw : t t c y tQr A-s - 2 u,• P.*A, ie /Vo. i o i lZQ � Fu.4-ire /a3�d— Ca.id `f-/f Proms/,Ps q s 1 I's 1-ed 14 'i-s b _ - �a(('►1a iQ�l 0�s�t,a.y� O�s,� H C��d,'�-.ar Nc . (y �grs� 1 /oa �eaK DiSGhar9C 2 o /Ora r,% S 3 z5 • 4 to C s 5 z 7 /00 8gckw�}-ter 8 S'0 P r a q zs- /C1 10 /7 Z /� A�nuq( �j �tsc�l�W Pro��1CS �SN Des, n �e5i4 h VetQC1 �`,� , 7 ke cka.,l ne.t was dcs � _n�c! vr- mctx ; mum P-ermt':ts b )c- On /0wS : C (i►Ca tit n e( — ^•c7 PS C��ec! Ca rc{�'�rDn� ti • 3 ► r-q'� c:.lna r p — !D. Des Tate ctl^a6ioel rectc.4 Sfa f'o fit,4 dr S..4hea1 ZS (1 rI'p,rnr� lvA. rCL i,'c s - u en ry7a r�� o Prn C,ed k re t .� 3 MI. �t'ti E �t�ta�r �u r �c� ��ro�i'�a s �.-o,-r, �►�'6►� Gr�e� �t t"h A✓C have f ah iv1C ��� ca� i�Ft �-11r`i r`r�4rt' � Ce *-.he Cjes1% res A-ir CC 4--t'o►i S ce Y e uF S iyectnq o { t-k-e d-'on e/. The hydraKk -C (: 4Pklci4lQ4 -,akj5 were rev,• ewed by Wendel/ 51-fir r e r r'11 15 $ ( ) J'r r"o r 7'a re!c4 s t- o IC e �= tZ�✓r`r`rJ t°1 n'F e h tl'�'t � .i vr°f}�4 G 7� ��rl-�rri e r1�. ._ Zee ccw%4-Cb jliNq Cone`r'�-iOHs Were 4-0 ho'f CX cr f'G1G El�v� � r'vn df=�' t�'• O 'uP �v J8o t-t, /� ve� cry rt/, cugS fhc Hie ad,'ac 14Hdoci`// 0rec, Is ahcl fie /eve/ P1 a r7 lAtivrr� t^econ�mr�ncfnd- T Ise �1acs<w�l er Fro r-,'!e eo,i f-ra tt vi f-,'/ u s f ctdwr►.sI-ro-Q � o f 1 80 f� /�J C i W t��.r e t-fin� � �4.IG c� c`�c k a�9 r pro�.'/e • r �� CeeCl CxWA >- ✓oir fc. C Tic Ic Year J�� _ C�r' lfi Cand ,'f�q.� co�fro/%cl f G,e Cl��xhn� c� es r'6: r bctsed ov► ermiS�i b!� �le.�ocr`�r'�c c r N EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER WATERSHED ICE.B. 25-Mar-93 P-1 PUMPING PLANT PUMP ROUTING-100 YEAR-8 DAY RUNOFF FUTURE WITH PROJECT CONDITION Pump Pond Storage Indication Time Discharge Inflow Outflow Pumps Control Storage Pond S.1.1 S.1.2 Limiting Static Qo1 Qo2 Qo3 Qo4 Qo5 Elevation Q Q turned Elev. Elev. Storage Q Head hours feet cfs cfs on feet feet AF cfs cfs cfs feet cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 0.0 7.3 50.0 0.0 0 4.0 4.000 0.0 0 0 6500.0 -3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 7.3 50.0 0.0 0 4.0 4.047 2.1 50 50 65W.0 -3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 7.3 50.0 0.0 0 4.0 4.094 4.1 100 100 6500.0 -3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 7.3 50.0 0.0 0 4.0 4.141 6.2 150 150 65W.0 -3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 7.3 50.1 0.0 0 4.0 4.188 8.3 200 200 6500.0 -3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 75 7.3 54.6 95.0 1 4.2 4.193 8.5 253 253 6500.0 -3.1 95.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 7.4 66.2 95.1 1 4.2 4.160 7.0 218 218 6500.0 -3.2 95.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 7.5 81.7 95.3 1 4.2 4.140 6.2 197 197 6500.0 -3.3 95.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 7.6 110.8 95.4 1 4.2 4.141 6.2 198 198 6500.0 -3.4 95.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 7.7 151.5 95.5 1 4.2 4.175 7.7 234 234 6500.0 -3.5 95.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 7.8 204.0 279.7 2 4.4 4.165 7.3 316 316 6500.0 -3.5 95.5 184.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 &0 276.6 280.3 2 4.4 4.214 9.4 276 368 6500.0 -3.7 95.8 184.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 i6.0 8.1 376.4 280.4 2 4.4 4.343 15.1 414 506 6500.0 -3.7 95.8 184.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 8.3 497.1 280.9 2 4.4 4.490 21.6 662 662 6500.0 -3.9 96.0 184.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 8.5 649.1 465.9 3 4.6 4.677 29.8 954 954 6500.0 -3.9 96.0 184.9 184.9 0.0 0.0 7.5 9.1 905.7 1069.2 4 4.8 4.686 30.2 1265 1265 6500.0 -4.4 96.7 186.0 186.0 600.5 0.0 8.0 9.8 1387.0 1077.1 4 4.8 4.755 33.2 1342 1342 6500.0 -5.0 97.5 187.5 187.5 604.6 0.0 8.5 12.1 1728.5 1718.9 5 5.0 4.905 39.8 1823 1823 6500.0 -7.1 100.2 191.9 191.9 617.4 617.4 9.0 12.8 1849.1 1730.4 5 5.0 4.965 42.5 1893 1893 6500.0 -7.8 101.1 193.3 193.3 621.4 621.4 9.5 13.4 2008.1 1739.3 5 5.0 5.122 50.5 2091 2091 6500.0 43 101.7 194.4 194.4 624.5 624.5 10.0 14.1 2256.8 2376.8 6 5.2 5.180 53.5 2484 2484 6500.0 -8.9 102.4 195.5 195.5 627.8 627.8 10.5 14.5 2537.3 2385.8 6 5.2 5.192 54.2 2504 2504 6500.0 -9.3 102-9 196.3 196.3 630.1 630.1 11.0 15.0 2774.6 2394.7 6 5.2 5.399 65.1 2774 2774 6500.0 -9.7 103.3 197.0 197.0 632.4 632.4 11.5 15.0 2924.7 3022.7 7 5.4 5.509 71.0 3229 3229 6500.0 -9.5 103.1 196.7 196.7 631.5 631.5 12.0 15.0 2985.2 3023.5 7 5.4 5.456 68.2 3161 3161 6500.0 -9.6 103.2 196.8 196.8 631.7 631.7 12.5 15.0 2980.5 3023.9 7 5.4 5.424 66.5 3121 3121 6500.0 -9.6 103.2 196.8 196.8 631.8 631.8 13.0 15.1 2939.0 3027.5 7 5.4 5.372 63.7 3056 3056 65000 -9.7 103.3 197.0 197.0 632.5 632.5 13.5 15.1 2874.3 3028.9 7 5.4 5.277 58.7 2935 2935 6500.0 -9.8 103.4 197.1 197.1 632.8 632.8 14.0 15.2 2799.1 2399.5 6 5.2 5.372 63.7 2742 2742 6500.0 -9.9 103.6 197.4 197.4 633.7 633.7 14.5 15.0 2721.4 3024.2 7 5.4 5.409 65.7 3102 3102 6500.0 -9.6 103.2 196.8 196.8 631.8 631.8 15.0 14.9 2644.3 2392.5 6 5.2 5.390 64.7 2761 2761 6500.0 -9.6 103.2 196.8 196.8 631.9 631.9 15.5 15.0 2569.5 3025.6 7 5.4 5.311 60.5 2976 2976 6500.0 -9.6 103.3 196.9 196.9 632.1 6321 16.0 15.1 2496.3 2399.5 6 5.2 5.171 53.1 2494 2494 6500.0 -9.9 103.6 197.4 197.4 633.7 633.7 16.5 15.3 2426.4 2403.5 6 5.2 5.218 55.6 2546 2546 6500.0 -10.1 103.8 197.8 197.8 634.7 634.7 17.0 15.5 2357.4 2408.0 6 5.2 5.207 55.0 2535 2535 6500.0 -10.3 104.0 198.2 198.2 635.9 635.9 17.5 15.8 2289.6 2415.5 6 5.2 5.138 51.3 2450 2450 6500.0 -10.6 104.4 198.8 198.8 637.8 637.9 1&0 16.1 2224.1 2423.5 6 5.2 5.011 44.6 2291 2291 5850.0 -11.0 104.8 199.5 199.5 639.9 639.9 18.5 16.7 2161.7 2436.0 6 5.2 5.076 48.0 2060 2380 5075.0 -11.6 105.5 200.5 200.5 643.2 643.2 19.0 17.4 2101.4 2451.3 6 5.2 5.083 48.4 2076 2397 4300.0 -123 106.2 201.8 201.8 647.2 647.2 19.5 18.1 2044.1 1817.2 5 5.0 5.035 45.9 2018 2018 3475.0 -13.1 107.1 203.2 203.2 651.8 651.8 20.0 18.9 1990.1 1828.7 5 5.0 5.186 53.9 2218 2218 2650.0 -13.8 107.9 204.5 204.5 655.9 65S.9 20.5 19.1 1929.1 1825.0 5 5.0 5.290 59.4 2349 2349 1825.0 -14.0 108.0 204.7 204.7 656.7 656.7 21.0 19.4 18622 1000.0 4 4.8 5.666 79.3 2420 2420 1000.0 -14.2 108.3 205.1 205.1 657.9 0.0 21.5 19.6 1795.5 400.0 3 4.6 6.526 125.9 3248 3248 400.0 -14.0 108.1 204.9 204.9 0.0 0.0 220 19.6 1731.6 400.0 3 4.6 7.488 182.3 4611 4611 400.0 -13.6 107.6 204.1 204.1 0.0 0.0 22-5 19.6 1676.3 400.0 3 4.6 8.341 236.2 5915 5915 400.0 -13.1 107.2 203.3 203.3 0.0 0.0 23.0 19.6 1630.6 400.0 3 4.6 9.119 288.0 7169 7169 400.0 -12-7 106.7 2026 202.6 0.0 0.0 23.5 19.6 1570.2 400.0 3 4.6 9.781 337.6 8369 8369 400.0 -124 106.4 2020 2020 0.0 0.0 24.0 19.6 1470.6 400.0 3 4.6 10.364 383.9 9490 9490 400.0 -121 106.1 201.5 201.5 0.0 0.0 24.5 19.6 1376.9 400.0 3 4.6 10.880 426.2 10514 10514 400.0 -11.9 105.8 201.1 201.1 0.0 0.0 25.0 19.6 1298.2 400.0 3 4.6 11.318 464.9 11451 11451 400.0 -11.6 105.5 200.7 200.7 0.0 0.0 25.5 19.6 1207.1 400.0 3 4.6 11.705 500.2 12304 M04 400.0 -11.4 105.3 200.3 200.3 0.0 0.0 26.0 19.6 1096.5 400.0 3 4.6 12-033 531.2 13056 13056 400.0 -11.3 105.1 200.0 200.0 0.0 0.0 26.5 19.6 9729 400.0 3 4.6 12234 557.4 13690 13690 400.0 -11.2 105.0 199.8 199.8 0.0 0.0 27.0 19.6 817.9 400.0 3 4.6 12-391 577.9 14185 14185 400.0 -11.1 104.9 199.7 199.7 0.0 0.0 27.5 19.6 7320 400.0 3 4.6 12511 593.4 14560 14560 400.0 -11.0 104.9 199.6 199.6 0.0 0.0 28.0 19.6 630.3 400.0 3 4.6 12600 605.0 14841 14841 400.0 -11.0 104.8 199.5 199.5 0.0 0.0 28.5 19.6 544.0 400.0 3 4.6 12691 616.9 15028 15128 400.0 -11.0 104.8 199.4 199.4 0.0 0.0 29.0 19.6 525.0 400.0 3 4.6 12-734 622-4 15262 15262 400.0 -10.9 104.7 199.4 199.4 0.0 0.0 29.5 19.6 508.0 400.0 3 4.6 12771 627.2 15378 15378 400.0 -10.9 104.7 199.3 199.3 0.0 0.0 30.0 19.6 496.0 400.0 3 4.6 12803 631.4 15480 15480 400.0 -10.9 104.7 199.3 199.3 0.0 0.0 30.5 19.6 487.0 400.0 3 4.6 12-832 635.2 15571 15571 400.0 -10.9 104.7 199.3 1993 0.0 0.0 31.0 19.6 478.0 400.0 3 4.6 12-858 638.5 15653 15653 400.0 -10.9 104.7 199.2 199.2 0.0 0.0 31.5 19.6 472-0 400.0 3 4.6 12.882 641.7 15728 15728 400.0 -10.9 104.7 199.2 199.2 0.0 0.0 320 19.6 466.0 400.0 3 4.6 12.904 644.5 15797 15797 400.0 -10.8 104.6 199.2 199.2 0.0 0.0 325 19.6 461.0 400.0 3 4.6 12924 647.1 15861 15861 400.0 -10.8 104.6 199.2 199.2 0.0 0.0 33.0 19.6 454.0 400.0 3 4.6 12.942 649.5 15918 15918 400.0 -10.8 104.6 199.2 199.2 0.0 0.0 33.5 19.6 450.0 400.0 3 4.6 12959 651.7 15970 15970 400.0 -10.8 104.6 199.1 199.1 0.0 0.0 34.0 19.6 444.0 400.0 3 4.6 12.974 653.6 16017 16017 400.0 -10.8 104.6 199.1 199.1 0.0 0.0 34.5 19.6 439.0 400.0 3 4.6 12-987 655.3 16058 16057 400.0 -10.8 104.6 199.1 199.1 0.0 0.0 35.0 19.6 433.0 400.0 3 4.6 12.998 656.7 16093 16093 400.0 -10.8 104.6 199.1 199.1 0.0 0.0 35.5 19.6 428.0 400.0 3 4.6 13.007 658.0 16124 16124 400.0 -10.8 104.6 199.1 199.1 0.0 0.0 36.0 19.6 421.0 400.0 3 4.6 13.013 659.0 16148 16148 400.0 -10.8 104.6 199.1 199.1 0.0 0.0 42-0 19.6 379.0 400.0 3 4.6 13.012 658.8 1529 1529 400.0 -10.8 104.6 199.1 199.1 0.0 0.0 48.0 19.6 341.0 400.0 3 4.6 12864 639.3 1489 1489 400.0 -10.9 104.7 199.2 199.2 0.0 0.0 54.0 19.6 311.0 400.0 3 4.6 12580 602-4 1415 1415 400.0 -11.0 104.8 199.5 199.5 0.0 0.0 60.0 19.6 287.0 400.0 3 4.6 12.197 552-6 1314 1314 400.0 -11.2 105.0 199.9 199.9 0.0 0.0 66.0 19.6 278.0 400.0 3 4.6 11.639 494.1 1197 1197 400.0 -11.5 105.4 200.4 200.4 0.0 0.0 MO 19.6 2520 400.0 3 4.6 10.894 427.3 1062 1062 400.0 -11.9 105.8 201.0 201.0 0.0 0.0 78.0 19.6 237.0 400.0 3 4.6 9.947 350.0 906 906 400.0 -12.3 106.3 201.9 201.9 0.0 0.0 84.0 19.6 224.0 400.0 3 4.6 8.800 266.0 736 736 400.0 -129 106.9 2029 202.9 0.0 0.0 90.0 19.6 213.0 400.0 3 4.6 7.384 175.E 555 555 400.0 -13.6 107.7 204.2 204.2 0.0 0.0 96.0 19.6 205.0 400.0 3 4.6 5.700 81.1 364 364 400.0 -14.5 109.5 205.6 205.6 0.0 0.0 102-0 19.6 195.0 109.0 1 4.2 5.190 54.1 164 164 400.0 -14.9 109.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 108.0 19.6 187.0 400.0 3 4.6 4.520 225 246 246 400.0 -15.0 109.1 206.6 206.6 0.0 0.0 114.0 19.6 180.0 0.0 0 4.0 4.340 15.0 30 30 400.0 -15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 120.0 19.6 174.0 315.9 2 4.4 4.550 24.2 207 207 400.0 -15.1 109.2 206.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.0 19.6 169.0 109.6 1 4.2 4.080 3.5 62 62 400.0 -15.5 109.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 132.0 19.6 1610 109.2 1 4.2 4.710 31.2 118 118 400.0 -15.1 109.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 138.0 19.6 159.0 316.5 2 4.4 4.116 5.1 169 169 400.0 -15.3 109.4 207.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 144.0 19.6 153.0 0.0 0 4.0 4.094 4.1 8 8 400.0 -15.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 150.0 19.6 149.0 109.0 1 4.2 5.150 52-0 159 159 400.0 -14.9 109.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 156.0 19.6 144.0 316.1 2 4.4 4.440 19.4 197 197 400.0 -15.2 109.3 206.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 162-0 19.6 140.0 0.0 0 4.0 4.260 11.4 23 23 400.0 -15.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 163.0 19.6 137.0 109.0 1 4.2 5.174 53.2 162 162 400.0 -14.9 109.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 174.0 19.6 133.0 316.2 2 4.4 4.334 14.7 188 188 400.0 -15.2 109.3 206.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 180.0 19.6 130.0 0.0 0 4.0 4.030 1.3 3 3 400.0 -15.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 186.0 19.6 125.0 109.2 1 4.2 4.846 37.2 130 130 400.0 -15.1 109.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1920 19.6 120.0 316.7 2 4.4 4.000 0.0 143 158 400.0 -15.4 109.5 207.2 0.0 00 0.0 198.0 19.6 0.0 0.0 0 4.0 4.000 0.0 -98 0 400.0 -15.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • • INPUT DATA TABLES TAGE-STORAGE CURVE STATIC HEAD-PUMP DISCHARGE CURVES Elev. Storage Storage Elev. Static Pump Pump Pump Pump#4 Pump Pump Pump Pump#8 Head Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q feet acre feet cfs-hrs feet feet cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 -15.0 110.0 206.0 206.0 664.0 664.0 664.0 664.0 664.0 5.0 44.0 532-4 5.0 -10.0 103.2 198.0 198.0 633.0 633.0 633.0 633.0 633.0 6.0 97.0 1173.7 6.0 -5.0 96.5 188.0 188.0 603.0 603.0 603.0 603.0 603.0 7.0 152.0 1839.2 7.0 0.0 89.7 176.0 176.0 599.5 599.5 599.5 599.5 599.5 &0 214.0 2589.4 8.0 5.0 82.8 1625 1625 542.0 5420 542-0 5420 542-0 9.0 279.0 3375.9 9.0 10.0 75.0 148.5 148.5 508.0 508.0 508.0 508.0 508.0 10.0 354.0 4283.4 10.0 15.0 66.3 134.0 134.0 4720 472-0 472.0 4720 4720 11.0 436.0 5275.6 11.0 20.0 56.3 118.3 118.3 434.5 434.5 434.5 434.5 434.5 120 527.0 6376.7 120 25.0 43.5 100.0 100.0 397.0 397.0 397.0 397.0 397.0 13.0 657.0 7949.7 13.0 14.0 810.0 9801.0 14.0 15.0 981.0 11870.1 15.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 16.0 1370.0 16577.0 16.0 Pump On Elev.'s 4.0 4.20 4.40 4.60 4.80 5.00 5.20 5.40 5.6 • 17.0 1770.0 21417.0 17.0 Pump Off Elev.'s 4.0 4.00 4.20 4.40 4.60 4.80 5.00 5.20 5.40 18.0 2250.0 27225.0 18.0 19.0 2820.0 341220 19.0 20.0 3469.0 41974.9 20.0 21.0 4400.0 5324C.0 21.0 220 5500.0 66550.0 220 23.0 7100.0 85910.0 23.0 24.0 9200.0 111320.0 24.0 25.0 12043.0 145720.3 25.0 � 1 w 0 11 � Z X / 0 � O x` G � alv X h yao v ti 5v�1 l tv`h St X-5ECTION LOCATIONS CONNECTING CHWNEL'DE51v1•) ��Zx,S DESivN H`CDR,�J�i�s 6�1+95 SST S►pE C,t�E��1 Rl\/F K yVATFC5HED �e�-I'T04 WATEtZ.SHED Pf�D7E[.T oFF1Gr r . ��. AGED CONDITION ,' . i - • WSP2 SUMMARY SHEET March. 1993 LSGR Connecting Channel Design iGED CONDITION TOTAL Q=2,770cfs X-SECT. W.S. MAIN SIDE Q-MAIN Q-SIDE VELOCITY VELOCITY COMMENTS ELEV. AREA AREA MAIN SIDE GRADd 10.7 499 --- 2770 --- 5.5 --- GRADu 10.8 501 --- 2770 --- 5.5 --- 67815 10.9 560 --- 2770 --- 4.9 --- 67755 11.0 620 --- 2770 --- 4.6 --- 67710 11.2 887 --- 2770 --- 3. 1 --- CONFLUENCE I405d 10.8 499 378 1910 860 3.8 2 .9 SPLIT FLOW I405 10.8 498 211 1910 860 3.8 4.4 SPLIT FLOW •I405u 10.8 499 264 1910 860 3.8 4.7 SPLIT FLOW 67445 10.9 624 337 1910 860 3.1 2 .6 SPLIT FLOW 67375 11.0 835 --- 2770 --- 2 .5 --- 67275 11.2 630 --- 2770 --- 4.6 --- 67185 11. 3 656 --- 2770 --- 4.2 --- SW16d I 11. 1 555 --- 2770 --- 5.6 --- SW16u 11.2 556 --- 2770 --- 5.6 --- COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS—ENG-523 Rev. 8-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE PROJECT v1�A � SGIZ. Gon✓le�flYi �?An✓IP� BY TF—) DA �3 CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT SHEET OF IF tj NIG 1�Y I•'• `N *.;i i \ `A.. - .r...:,.,�5a: ' '= =cS+�?tr z._dt.�,•,•�S�!•. :3�'_*__* y�� 1�'�° 'eahF +-'�S: yys1{*Gt4�SP'= �'�iS 'i�k�?tii%w }F a I S � � m 0 a D v Z N rn S J xm 0 I WSP2 XE9 03/24/93 14:18:20 WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: 1 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- WSP2 30. TITLE ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WTITLE _=_-> SIDE CHANNEL ONLY TITLE POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** DISCHARGE -24.8 .42238 .3502 .27798 .20578 DISCHARGE -24.8 .31047 STARTE SIDE1 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 STARTE SIDE1 10.1 OUTPUT S COMMENT ********* * SIDE CHANNEL OPEN *****$*** ***** COMMENT ****SR405 AND GRADY BOXES AS OPEN CHANNELS**** COMMENT -----DISCHARGES FROM 1980 ESGR HYDROLOGY------ REACHSIDE1 2770.0 0.0 0.0 REACH SIDE2 2770.0 110.0 110.0 REACH SIDES 2770.0 90.0 90.0 REACH SIDE4 2770.0 100.0 100.0 REACH SIDE5 2770.0 70.0 70.0 SECTION SIDE1 0.0 14.0 32.0 2.0 58.0 2.0 74.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SIDE1 1.0 C 32.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT SIDE1 2.0 C 58.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SIDE1 3.0 C 74.0 NVALUE 0.050 ;ECTION SIDE2 0.0 14.0 31.0 2.0 40.0 2.0 52.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SIDE2 1.0 C 40.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SIDE2 2.0 C 52.0 NVALUE 0.040 SECTION SIDE3 0.0 14.0 24.0 2.0 37.0 2.0 62.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SIDE3 1.0 C 24.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT SIDE3 2.0 C 37.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SIDE3 3.0 C 62.0 NVALUE 0.050 1 WSP2 XEA 03/24/93 14:18:20 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS _-__ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 1 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SECTION SIDE4 0.0 10.0 19.0 2.0 37.0 2.0 962.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SIDE4 1.0 C 37.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT SIDE4 2.0 C 62.0 NVALUE 0.040 SECTION SIDE5 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.68 29.0 2.68 60.0 2.68 66.0 2.0 83.0 2.0 109.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SIDE5 1.0 C 0.1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT SIDE5 2.0 C 29.0 SVALUE 0.035 EGMENT SIDE5 3.0 C 53.0 NVALUE 0.40 SEGMENT SIDE5 4.0 C 83.0 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT SIDE5 5.0 C 109.0 NVALUE 0.50 COMPUTE SIDEI SIDE5 SIDEI ------------------------------END OF DATA LISTING------------------------------ - 1 COMPUTE SIDEI SIDE5 SIDEI ------------------------------STARTING DATA FROM GIVEN ELEVATION------------------------------ 1 WSP2 XEA 03/24/93 14:18:20 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 2 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION ST.DE1 DA: 2770.0 SA MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA 9 ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SA FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 • BANK FULL 2.0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** i 10.7 378.0 1170.0 .00 .00 .00 .42 5.6 .00030 60.8 2 10.7 378.0 970.1 .00 .00 .00 .35 5.2 .00020 60.8 3 10.7 378.0 770.0 .00 .00 .00 .28 4.8 .00013 60.8 4 10.7 378.0 570.0 .00 .00 .00 .21 4.3 .00007 60.8 5 10.7 378.0 860.0 .00 .00 .00 .31 5.0 .00016 60.8 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SIDE1 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 1170. 132. 978. 59. 0. VELOCITY FPS 3.99 1.31 4.33 1.18 2 DISCHARGE CFS 970. 110. 811. 49. 0. VELOCITY FPS 3.31 1.08 3.59 .97 3 DISCHARGE CFS 770. 87. 644. 39. 0. VELOCITY FPS 2.63 .86 2.85 .77 4 DISCHARGE CFS 570. 64. 477. 29, 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.95 .64 2.11 .57 5 DISCHARGE CFS 860. 97. 719. 44. • 0. VELOCITY FPS 2.94 .96 3.18 .86 1 ELEV 10.7 KD 68014. 7653. 56916. 3445. 2 ELEV 10.7 KD 68014. 7653. 56916. 3445. 3 ELEV 10.7 KD 68014. 7653. 56916. 3445. 4 ELEV 10.7 KD 68014. 7653. 56916. 3445. 5 ELEV 10.7 KD 68014. 7653. 56916. 3445. 1 WSDl) YFO 1R•q() FCGR ---- 6f:Fn rnNnTTTnN /---- V 08CF RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SIDE2 DA: 2770.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA 9 ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SA FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 10.5 207.3 1170.0 .00 .10 .10 .42 7.6 .00123 39.5 2 10.6 209.6 970.1 .00 .10 .10 .35 7.1 .00082 39.8 3 10.6 211.5 770.0 .00 .10 .10 .28 6.5 .00050 39.9 4 10.7 212.8 570.0 .00 .10 .10 .21 5.8 .00027 40.0 5 10.6 210.8 860.0 .00 .10 .10 .31 6.8 .00063 39.9 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SIDE2 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 1170. 1071. 99. 0. VELOCITY FPS 6.06 6.27 2.72 2 DISCHARGE CFS 970. 888. 82. 0. VELOCITY FPS 4.97 5.14 2.23 3 DISCHARGE CFS 770. 704. 66. 0. VELOCITY FPS 3.91 4.04 1.76 4 DISCHARGE CFS 570. 521. 49. 0. VELOCITY FPS 2.88 2.98 1.29 5 DISCHARGE CFS 860. 787. 73. 0. VELOCITY FPS 4.38 4.53 1.97 1 ELEV 10.5 KD 33391. 30574. 2816. 2 ELEV 10.6 KD 33882. 31014. 2868. 3 ELEV 10.6 KD 34290. 31379. 2911. 4 ELEV 10.7 KD 34563. 31623. 2940. 5 ELEV 10.6 KD 34141. 31246. 2895. 1 WSP2 XEA 03/24/93 14:18:20 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 4 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SIDES DA: 2770.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA 9 ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 10.5 259.2 1170.0 .00 .10 .10 .42 6.9 .00094 47.8 2 10.6 262.1 970.1 .00 .10 .10 .35 6.4 .00063 48.0 • 3 10.6 264.4 770.0 .00 .10 .10 .28 5.9 .00039 48.2 4 10.7 266.1 570.0 .00 .10 .10 .21 5.3 .00021 48.4 5 10.6 263.6 860.0 .00 .10 .10 .31 6.1 .00049 48.1 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SIDE3 SFr. Nn blbL ➢O➢ c cS1Y1 um u I AJIJ c '£bZ8 MLZ '6LbS£ ON T'Ii A313 I 6F'Z T9'Z 95'Z Sd3 AII0013A '0 86I Z99 '098 SAO 39MOSIO S Z9'T 9L'T FL'T Sd3 AII3013A '0 '0£T Otiti OLS SAO 39M OSIO t . ST'Z SF'Z TF'Z Sd3 AII3013A '0 'LLT '26S 'OLL SAO 35M OSIO F 99'Z Tb'Z 98'Z Sd3 AIIOO13A '0 ,tzz 9tt 'OL6 SAO 398VHOSIG Z bi'F W 2 8£'2 Sd3 AII3013A '0 'ZLZ 868 'OLTT SAO 39adHOSIO T ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0 Z T 1tl101 WSO ON 93S tHIS NOI103S 80A 318VI 1N3W93S *x*xx*x*t*S1NIOd ON3 30 NOISN31X3 lVOIla3A NO 03Sd8 N0I1VIAdWOO '13 b' A8 VIVO ARM S0333X3 S ON 31I308d**ttxt***x9NINbVM *x***tt***S1NIOd ON3 30 NOISN31X3 1VDI183A NO 03Stl8 NOIIVIndWOO '13 8' AB VIVO ARM S033OX3 t ON 31I30ad*t**x$xx*t9NIN8VM s:tt******S1NIOd ON3 30 NOISN31X3 1VOI183A NO 03Stl8 NOIlVIndWOO '13 6' A8 VIVO A3AdnS S033OX3 F ON 31I30ad*tttttt*t*9NINHVM **x*xt**x*S1NIOd ON3 30 NOISN31X3 1VOIMA NO 03SVB NOIIVIndWOO '13 O'T A8 VIVO AUHS SO330X3 Z ON 31I30ad*tt*xtx**x9NINdVM *xsts:txt*SINIOd ON3 30 NOISN31X3 IVOI183A NO 03SH8 NOlIVIndWOO '13 T'T A8 VIVO ARM SO333X3 T ON 31I308d#:*x*xx***9NINHM 9'SS b9000' S'S iF' £T' £I' 00' 0'098 8'922 COT S F'SS 02000' 8'b TZ' FT' FT' 00' O'OLS 0'0££ 8'OT 6 S'SS 2S000' £'S 8Z' FT' FT' 00' O'OLt 4'ti££ COT F L'SS 08000' 8'S SF' FT' FT' 00' I'OL6 O,M 0'TT Z 0'9S 60T00' Z'9 Zt, £T' FT' 00' O'OLTT L'LbF I'TT T ***$*W01108 13NNVHO WOa3 AlSV3NI1 031VIOdKINI M013 '31I308d 1SdI3 0,0138 A313 -39VSS3Wt**xx L'FS ZT' Zl' 00' 9'b96 L'98Z O'OT ON89 MO1 x**x*W01108 13NNVHO W08J AIMNI1 O31dlOd831NI M013 '31I308d ISM M0139 A313 -39USS3W*s*xt 0' 00' 00' 00' 0' 0' 0'Z 11f13 XNd8 O'0 0'0 0'Z 0 13 13/13 13 13NNVHO 39VWVO HlOIM 3dO1S A313 WSO ICU NId1d00013 SAO 13 BS 13 d01 M013 NOIlOIa3 H80 9NI HIS -------030001A SH 3d------ B V38d A313 ON ------------------------------- 00' =3301 1NOO 00' =3300 dX3 IW BS O'OLLZ :VO V30IS NOI133S d03 318d1 9NIIV8 :lld *09IS30 13NNVHO 9NI133NN03*t Nnd H191 MS 01 ONOd 0'Z NOIS83A 06/10/TT A36 39tld SM ----> NOIlI0NOO 030U <---- HS3 OZ:8I:tT £6/bZ/20 63X U SM T '299S '9b6LZ 809 ti06F ON 9'OT A313 S '95LS 02Zsz '96tS 'ZD62 ON COT A313 t 5695 9b08Z '62K '08T62 ON 9'OT A313 F '8095 9LLLZ SSFS 'OtL82 ON 9'OT A313 Z 'SOSS 95bLZ 'LSZS 'BIZ82 ON S'01 A313 1 Z9'1 OS'S i9'T W t Sd3 AIIOO13A '0 'SZT 'ST9 'OZT '098 SAO 3MUSI0 S 90'T Z9'F 90'T TT'F Sd3 AII0013A '0 '£8 'LOt OB 'OLS SAO 398VHOSIO t W T W t W T FZ'ti Sd3 AII3013A '0 'ZTT OSS 'LOT OLL SAO 39adH3SI0 F 28'T 2Z'9 £8'1 LF'S Sd3 AII3013A '0 'ItT 4b9 S£i 'OL6 SAO 39abHOSIO Z £Z'Z BS'L ZZ'Z is*9 Sd3 A1I3013A '0 '69T '628 Z91 'OLTT SAO 398VHOSIO i ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0 0 4 ELEV 10.8 KD 32834. 25339. 7495. 5 ELEV 10.9 KD 33866. 26084. 7782. *****WARNING - SECT. SIDES KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE *****WARNING - SECT. SIDES KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:18:20 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 6 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SIDES DA: 2770.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.0 29.8 40.5 .00 .03 .03 20.7 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 11.2 860.3 1170.0 .00 .17 .17 .42 3.8 .00014 103.0 2 11.1 842.9 970.1 .00 .16 .16 .35 3.6 .00010 102.6 3 10.9 829.3 770.0 .00 .16 .16 .28 3.4 .00007 102.3 4 10.8 Bl&7 570.0 .00 .16 .16 .21 3.1 .00004 102.1 5 11.0 835.3 860.0 .00 .16 .16 .31 3.5 .00008 102.4 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SIDES SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 C C C C C � --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . -1 DISCHARGE CFS 1170. 0. 521. 51. 589. 9. 0. VELOCITY FPS 2.10 .00 2.11 .20 2.18 .09 2 DISCHARGE CFS 970. 0. 432. 43. 489. 7. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.77 .00 1.78 .17 1.84 .08 3 DISCHARGE CFS 770. 0. 342. 34. 388, 5. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.43 .00 1.44 .14 1.49 .06 4 DISCHARGE CFS 570. 0. 253. 25. 287. 4. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.07 .00 1.08 .11 1.11 .05 5 DISCHARGE CFS 860. 0. 383. 38. 433. 6. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.58 .00 1.59 .16 1.65 .07 1 ELEV 11.2 KD 98484. 14. 43853. 4319. 49586. 713. 2 ELEV 11.1 KD 95342. 13. 42411. 4202. 48038. 678. 3 ELEV 10.9 KD 92925. 13. 41302. 4112. 46845. 652. 4 ELEV 10.8 KD 91051. 13. 40443. 4042. 45920. 632. 5 ELEV 11.0 KD 93974. 13. 41783. 4152. 47363. 663. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:18:20 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 7 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- TITLE P-1 CHANNEL PROFILE - SIDE CHANNEL ENDJOB • ***********x*************x****NORMAL END OF JOB------------------------------ 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:18:20 WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: -___ 1 ENDP.UN SCS WSP2 VERSION 11/01/90 FILE SUMMARY y' INPUT : age-side.dat OUTPUT : age-side.run DATED 03/24/93 14:18:20 I WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 �f'�� " ' WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: 1 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- WSP2 30. TITLE ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION t S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd TITLE P-1 TRIPLE TRAP, CHANNEL * 60-8OFt * DESIGN RUN DISCHARGE -24.8 1.000 STARTE SW16u 11.2 OUTPUT COMMENT $$ # BRIDGE AT SW 27TH ST. $ $ $* $ COMMENT ---DISCHARGES FROM 1980 REVISED TR20 RUN----- REACHSW16u 2770.0 70.0 70.0 REACH 67018 2740.0 100.0 100.0 REACH 66000 2740.0 1018.0 1018.0 REACH 65000 2740.0 1000.0 1000.0 REACH 64300 2740.0 700.0 700.0 REACH 64000 2340.0 300.0 300.0 REACH 63200 2340.0 800.0 800.0 ROAD SW-27 2.1 100.0 100.0 REACH 63000 2330.0 100.0 100.0 REACH 62000 2320.0 1000.000 01000.000 REACH 60000 2300.0 2000.000 02000.000 REACH 59000 2290.0 1000.000 01000.000 REACH 58000 2280.0 1000.000 01000.000 REACH 57100 2270.0 900.000 00900.000 REACH 56800 2270.0 300.000 00300.000 REACH 56500 2270.0 300.000 00300.000 REACH 56000 2250.0 500.000 00500.000 SECTION SW16u 0.00 14.00 0.01 2.72 10.0 2.72 17.5 0.22 29.5 0.22 37.0 2.72 60.0 2.72 60.01 14.00 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SW16u 1.0 N .01 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT SW16u 2.0 N 10.0 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT SW16u 3.0 N 37.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT SW16u 4.0 N 60.00 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT SW16u 5.0 N 60.01 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION 67018 0.00 14.00 14.30 9.24 34.3 9.24 53.80 2.74 61.30 0.24 73.30 0.74 80.80 2.74 135.8 2.74 169.60 14.00 ENDTABLE 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED AGED CONDITION $ S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS _ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-80Ft DESIGN RUN ALT: 1 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT 67018 1.0 N 14.30 NVALUE 0.10 • SEGMENT 67018 2.0 N 34.30 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 67018 3.0 N 53.80 NVALUE 0.10 SEGMENT 67018 4.0 N 80.80 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67018 5.0 N 135.80 NVAIl1F n Ms NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 66000 00000.000 00014.000 00013.800 00009.500 00033.800 00009.500 00053.300 00003.000 00060.800 00000.500 00072.800 00000.500 00080.300 00003.000 00136.300 00003.000 00169.300 00014.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 66000 00001.00ON 00013.800 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 66000 00002.00ON 00033.800 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 66000 00003.00ON 00053.300 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 66000 00004.00ON 00080.300 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 66000 00005.00ON 00136.300 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 66000 00006.00ON 00169.300 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 65000 00000.000 00014.000 00013.200 00009.700 00033.200 00009.700 00052.700 00003.200 00060.200 00000.700 00072.200 00000.700 00079.700 00002.700 00135.700 00003.200 00168.100 00014.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 65000 00001.00ON 00013.200 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 65000 00002.00ON 00033.200 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 65000 00003.00ON 00052.700 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 65000 00004.00ON 00079.700 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 65000 00005.00ON 00135.700 iNVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 65000 00006.00ON 00168.100 1 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED AGED CONDITION S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL a 60-8OFt DESIGN RUN ALT: 2 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 64300 00000.000 00014.000 00012.900 00009.800 00032.900 00009.800 00052.400 00003.300 00059.900 00000.800 00071.900 00000.800 00079.400 00003.300 00135,400 00003.300 00167.500 00014.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 64300 00001.00ON 00012.900 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 64300 00002.00ON 00032.900 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 64300 00003.00ON 00052.400 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 64300 00004.00ON 00079.400 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 64300 00005.00ON 00135.400 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 64300 00006.00ON 00167.500 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 64000 00000.000 00014.000 00012.600 00009.900 00032.600 00009.900 00052.100 00003,400 00059.600 00000.900 00071.900 00000.900 00079.100 00003.400 00135.400 00003.400 00166.900 00014.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 64000 00001.00ON 00012.600 NVALUE 0.100 �qFr,,MFNT WOO noon? OOON MOT? inn SEGMENT 64000 00003.00ON 00052.100 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 64000 00004.00ON 00079.100 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 64000 00005.00ON 00135.400 NVALUE 0.035 'SEGMENT 64000 00006.00ON 00166.900 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 63200 00000.000 00021.000 00012.600 00010.000 00032.600 00010.000 00052.100 00003.500 00059.600 00001.000 00071.600 00001.000 00079.100 00003.500 00135.100 00003.500 00169.600 00014.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 63200 00001.00ON 00012.600 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 63200 00002.00ON 00032.600 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 63200 00003.00ON 00052.100 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt # DESIGN RUN ALT: 3 - ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 63200 00004.00ON 00079.100 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 63200 00005.00ON 00135.100 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 63200 00006.00ON 00169.600 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION SW-27 -5.00 00021.000 00000.000 0021.000 00000.000 00014.000 00012.60 00010.050 00032.600 00010.050 00059.600 00001.050 67.60 00001.050 0073.600 00003.050 00123.600 0003.0500 000157.2 00014.000 00157.20 00021.000 00160.000 0021.2000 ENDTABLE BPR SW-27 B 1. 3. PIER 4.00 1.50 3.05 1.50 GIRDER 19.00 18.00 0.00 0.80 2.7 0.00 21.00 0.00 18.00 157.20 18.00 157.20 21.00 ENDTABLE SECTION 63000 00000.000 00016.000 00018.000 00010.100 00038.000 00010.100 00057.500 00003.600 00065.000 00001.100 00077.000 00001.100 00084.500 00003.600 00140.500 00003.100 00171.700 00014.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 63000 00001.00ON 00018,000 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 63000 00002.00ON 00038.000 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 63000 00003.00ON 00057.500 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 63000 00004.00ON 00084.500 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 63000 00005.00ON 00140.500 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 63000 00006.00ON 00171.700 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 62000 00000.000 00016.000 00017.400 00010.300 00037.400 00010.300 00056.900 00003.800 00064.400 00001.300 00076.400 00001.300 00083.900 00003.800 00139.900 00003.800 00173.500 00015.000 ENDTABLE SFr.MPHT 41)nnn nnnn+ nnnti Anti Ann SEGMENT 62000 00002.00ON 00037.400 NVALUE 0.050 1 WSP2 XEG 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt * DESIGN RUN ALT: 4 ----------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT 62000 00003.00ON 00056.900 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 62000 00004.000N 00083.900 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 62000 00005.000N 00139,900 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 62000 00006.00ON 00173.500 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 60000 00000.000 00016.000 00016.200 00010.700 00036.200 00010.700 00055.700 00004.200 00063.200 00001.700 00075.200 00001.700 00082.700 00004.200 00138.700 00004.200 00171.100 00015.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 60000 00001.00ON 00016.200 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 60000 00002.00ON 00036.200 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 60000 00003.00ON 00055.700 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 60000 00004.00ON 00082.700 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 60000 00005.00ON 00138.700 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 60000 00006.00ON 00171.100 NVALUE 0.100 ,SECTION 59000 00000.000 00016.000 00015.600 00010.900 00035.600 00010.900 00055.100 00004.400 00062.600 00001.900 00074.600 00001.900 00082.100 00004.400 00138.100 00004.400 00169.900 00015.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 59000 00001.00ON 00015.600 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 59000 00002.00ON 00035.600 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 59000 00003.00ON 00055.100 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 59000 00004.00ON 00082.100 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 59000 00005.00ON 00138.100 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 59000 00006.00ON 00169.900 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 58000 00000.000 00016.000 00015.000 00011.000 00035.000 00011.000 00054.500 00004.500 00062.000 00002.000 00074.0 00002.000 1 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-80Ft * DESIGN RUN ALT: 5 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 00081.500 00004.500 00137.500 00004.500 00169.000 00015.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 58000 00001.00ON 00015.000 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 58000 00002.00 N 00035.000 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 58000 00003.000N 00054.500 04;1IF n inn NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 58000 00005.00ON 00137.500 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 58000 00006.00ON 00169.000 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 57100 00000.000 00016.000 00014.400 00011.300 00034.400 00011.300 00053.900 00004.800 00061.400 00002.300 00073.400 00002.300 00080.900 00004.800 00136.900 00004.800 00167.500 00015.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 57100 00001.00ON 00014.400 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 57100 00002.00ON 00034.400 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 57100 00003.00ON 00053.900 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 57100 00004.00ON 00080.900 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 57100 00005.00ON 00136.900 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 57100 00006.00ON 00167.500 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 56800 00000.000 00016.000 00014.100 00011.300 00034.100 00011.300 00053.600 00004.800 00061.100 00002.300 00073.100 00002.300 00080.600 00004.800 00096.600 00004.800 00136.200 00015.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 56800 00001.00ON 00014.100 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 56800 00002.00ON 00034.100 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 56800 00003.00ON 00053.600 ;NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 56800 00004.00ON 00080.600 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 56800 00005.00ON 00096.600 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED AGED CONDITION S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS ---- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL $ 60-8OFt DESIGN RUN ALT: 6 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 56800 00006.00ON 00136.200 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 56500 00000.000 00016.000 00035.100 00004.400 00042.600 00002,400 00054,600 00002.400 00062.100 00004.400 00075.100 00004.400 00110.200 00016.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 56500 00001.00ON 00035.100 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 56500 00002.00ON 00062.100 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 56500 00003.000N 00075.100 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 56500 00004.00ON 00110.200 NVALUE 0.100 • SECTION 56000 00000.000 00016.000 00034.800 00004.500 00042.300 00002.500 00054.300 00002.500 00061.800 00004.500 00074.800 00004.500 00109.600 00016.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 56000 00001.00ON 00034.800 NVALUE 0.100 SF&MFNT WAn nnnnl MON WAI ann SEGMENT 56000 00003.00ON 00074.800 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 56000 00004.00ON 00109.600 NVALUE 0.100 COMPUTE SW16u 56000 SW16u ------------------------------END OF DATA LISTING------------------------------ COMPUTE SW16u 56000 SW16u ------------------------------STARTING DATA FROM GIVEN ELEVATION------------------------------ 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED $ AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL $ 60-80Ft x DESIGN RUN ALT: ____ 7 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SW16u DA: 2770.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .2 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 11.2 557.5 2770.0 .00 .00 .10 1.00 5.9 .00100 60.0 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS : __- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt * DESIGN RUN ALT: __- 8 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67018 DA: 2740.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 i ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .2 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 11.4 1027.3 2740.0 .00 .00 .35 1.00 5.4 .00025 154.2 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED $ AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS : __- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL $ 60-8OFt * DESIGN RUN ALT: _-_ 9 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 66000 DA: 2740.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .5 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .5 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 11.7 1039.5 2740.0 .00 .00 3.63 1.00 5.6 .00024 N 155.2 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL $ 60-80Ft * DESIGN RUN ALT: ___ 10 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 65000 DA: 2740.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- Nn FI FV AAFA 0 ------arRFc Fi nnnFn------- CT84TTNc rPTT UTrTT0Kj Ginty Tno DAMAGE CHANNEL ri FT/FT FT 0 .7 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .7 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 11.9 1060.8 2740.0 .00 .00 3.57 1.00 5.6 .00022 155.4 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS PAGE �N REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt * DESIGN RUN ALT: Y 11 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 64300 DA: 2740.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .8 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .8 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 12.1 1053.8 2740.0 .00 .00 2.50 1.00 5.9 .00023 155.8 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS : ___ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt * DESIGN RUN ALT: �- 12 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 64000 DA: 2340.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT •+ 0 .9 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .9 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 12.2 1055.5 2340.0 .00 .00 1.07 1.00 5.7 .00017 155.8 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-80Ft * DESIGN RUN ALT: 13 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 63200 DA: 2340.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 1.0 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 12.3 1064.7 2340.0 .00 .00 2.83 1.00 5.8 .00016 154.1 1 TABLE OF VALUES FOR BPR EQUATION IF AN * SYMBOL APPEARS BESIDE A VARIABLE IN THIS TABLE,IT IS EXTRAPOLATED FROM FIGURES 6,7,10, OR 34 OF THE BPR MANUAL. NO. M AKB DLTAK SIGMA DKS COEFK VN2 ALPHA ALPHA2 ALPHA3 AEXIT APPAR DCRIT CRIT • FPS SQ FT SQ FT FT COEF 1 1.00 .00 .08 1.00 .00 .08 2.37 1.73 1.73 1.75 1059.33 1078.16 5.86 .00 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS : _-__ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt * DESIGN RUN ALT: ____ 14B onOn UPTTnU CW-17 STARTING BRIDGE BRIDGE CULVERT CULVERT WEIR WEIR WEIR NO. HW CFS HL TW CSM CFS AREA CFS AREA CFS AREA TOP WIDTH FT FT FT SQ FT SQ FT SQ FT FT 0 1.05 0.0 0.00 1.05 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 12.34 2330.0 .02 12.32 1.00 2330.0 983.4 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 MIN ROAD ELEVATION : 21.00 FT BRIDGE TYPE : BPR GIRDER BOTTOM ELEVATION : 18.00 FT OPENING NO.: 1 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt $ DESIGN RUN ALT: 15 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 63000 DA: 2330.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 1.1 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.1 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 12.4 1072.6 2330.0 .00 .00 .72 1.00 5.7 .00016 155.9 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED $ AGED CONDITION $ S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS : N PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt * DESIGN RUN ALT: 16 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 62000 DA: 2320.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 1.3 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.3 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 12.5 1045.2 2320.0 .00 .00 3.57 1.00 6.1 .00017 155.4 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS : _- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt $ DESIGN RUN ALT: �__ 17 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 60000 DA: 2300.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 1.7 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.7 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 12.9 1036.2 2300.0 .00 .00 7.12 1.00 6.5 .00017 155.1 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION t S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS : __- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt $ DESIGN RUN ALT: ____ 18 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 59000 DA: 2290.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- 140. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 1.9 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.9 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 13.0 1031.7 2290.0 .00 .00 3.56 1.00 6.6 .00017 154.9 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-80Ft * DESIGN RUN ALT: _w 19 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 58000 DA: 2280.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 13.2 1042.4 2280.0 .00 .00 3.56 1.00 6.7 .00016 155.2 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS : �_ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt * DESIGN RUN ALT: 20 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 57100 DA: 2270.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.3 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.3 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 13.4 1019.3 2270.0 .00 .00 3.19 1.00 7.0 .00017 154.4 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS : ___ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt * DESIGN RUN ALT: 21 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 56800 DA: 2270.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.3 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.3 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 13.2 695.1 2270.0 .00 .00 .83 1.00 7.9 .00042 121.0 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt * DESIGN RUN ALT: 22 • RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 56500 DA: 2270.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT S9 FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT n o A n n n n $*P0MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 13.3 636.2 2270.0 .00 .00 .65 1.00 7.9 .00044 93.9 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 OB:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED t AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt x DESIGN RUN ALT: 23 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 56000 DA: 2250.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.5 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.5 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 13.5 647.7 2250.0 .00 .00 1.09 1.00 7.9 .00041 94.7 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * S.W. 16th TO S.W. 43rd WS : _ _ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60-8OFt $ DESIGN RUN ALT: 24 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- TITLE P-1 CHANNEL PROFILE - S016th TO SW43rd ENDJOB ****x****************x********NORMAL END OF JOB------------------------------ 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 08:00:53 WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: 1 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- ENDRUN SCS WSP2 VERSION 11/01/90 FILE SUMMARY INPUT : 16-43age.dat OUTPUT : 16-43age.run DATED 03/25/93 08:00:53 ` 1 4 WSP2 XEA 03/24/93 14:17:56 "'" ''r'" WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: 1 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- WSP2 30. TITLE ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- ITLE GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN *$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGNO DISCHARGE -24.8 1.00 .7942 .722 .64982 DISCHARGE -24.8 .68953 .57762 STARTE 68076 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 STARTE 68076 10.7 10.7 OUTPUT S COMMENT $###SR405 AND GRADY BOXES AS OPEN CHANNELS**** COMMENT -----DISCHARGES FROM 1980 ESGR HYDROLOGY------ COMMENT ----FUTURE WITH PROJECT CONDITION HYDROLOGY--- REACH 68076 2770.0 0. 0. REACH GRADd 2770.0 50.0 50.0 REACH GRADu 2770.0 196.0 196.0 REACH 67815 2770.0 15.0 15.0 REACH 67755 2770.0 60.0 60.0 REACH 67710 2770.0 45.0 45.0 REACH I405d 2770.0 49.0 49.0 REACH I405 2770.0 85.0 85.0 REACH I405u 2770.0 85.0 85.0 REACH 67445 2770.0 45.0 45.0 REACH 67375 2770.0 70.0 70.0 REACH 67275 2770.0 100.0 100.0 REACH 67185 2770.0 90.0 90.0 REACH SW16d 2770.0 12. 12. REACH SW16u 2770.0 58.0 58.0 SECTION 68016 0.0 14.0 14.7 9.1 32.7 9.1 53.7 2.1 59.7 0.1 67.7 0.1 73.7 2.1 93.4 2.1 129.4 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 68076 1.0 C 14.7 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68076 2.0 C 32.7 NVALUE 0.034 SEGMENT 68076 3.0 C 53.7 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68076 4.0 C 73.7 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68076 5.0 C 93.4 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 68076 6.0 C 129.4 NVALUE 0.045 SECTION GRADd 0.0 13.090 0.0 2.05 11.00 2.05 1 WSP2 XEA 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS --_- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 1 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 11.00 13.09 12.00 13.09 12.00 0.05 23.00 0.05 23.00 13.09 24.00 13.09 24.00 2.05 35.00 2.05 35.00 13.09 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.05 47.00 2.05 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.05 59.00 2.05 59.00 13.09 ENDTABLE SEGMENT GRADd 1.0 C 59.0 13.09 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION GRADu i1.00 13.09 12.00 13.09 12.00 0.09 23.00 0.09 23.00 13.09 24.00 13.09 24.00 2.09 35.00 2.09 35.00 13.09 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.09 47.00 2.09 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.09 59.00 2.09 59.00 13.09 ENDTABLE SEGMENT GRADu 1.0 C 59.0 13.09 IM NVALUE 0.012 SECTION 67815 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.21 29. 2.21 35.4 .09 47.4 .09 53.8 2.21 60. 2.21 60.1 14. ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67315 1.0 C 0.1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT 67815 2.0 C 60. NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67815 3.0 C 60.1 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION 67755 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.59 29. 2.59 35. 0.1 47. .1 53. 2.59 60. 2.59 83. 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67755 1.0 C .1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT 67755 2.0 C 29. NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 67755 3.0 C 53. NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67755 4.0 C 83. i.;VALUE 0.035 SECTION 67710 1 WSP2 XEA 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN 000NNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN* ALT: 2 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.62 27. 2.62 35. 0.12 47. .12 56. 2.62 60.0 2.62 90.0 2.0 106.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67710 1.0 C .1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT 67710 2.0 C 27.0 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 67710 3.0 C 56.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67710 4.0 C 106.0 NVALUE 0.035 SECTION I405d 0.0 13.09 0.0 2.12 11.00 2.12 11.00 13.09 12.00 13.09 12.00 0.12 23.00 0.12 23.00 13.09 24.00 13.09 24.00 2.12 35.00 2.12 35.00 13.09 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.12 47.00 2.12 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.12 59.00 2.12 59.00 13.09 ENDTABLE SEGMENT I405d 1.0 C 59.0 13.09 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION I405 0.0 13.09 0.0 2.16 11.00 2.16 it on 11 09 19 on 13 n9 19 nn n 1� 24.00 2.16 35.00 2.16 35.00 13.09 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.16 47.00 2.16 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.16 59.00 2.16 59.00 13.09 ENDTABLE SEGMENT I405 1.0 C 59.0 13.09 ;NVALUE 0.012 .&SECTION I405u 0.0 13.09 0.0 2.16 11.00 2.16 11.00 13.09 12.00 13.09 12.00 0.16 23.00 0.06 23.00 13.09 24.00 13.09 24.00 2.16 35.00 2.16 35.00 13.09 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.16 47.00 2.16 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.16 59.00 2.16 59.00 13.09 ENDTABLE SEGMENT I405u 1.0 C 59.0 NVALUE 0.012 1 WSP2 XEA 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN $$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN#* ALT: 3 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SECTION 67445 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.66 29. 2.66 35. .16 47. 0.16 53. 2.66 60. 2.66 75.0 7.9 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67445 1.0 C 0.1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT 67445 2.0 C 29. NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 67445 3.0 C 53. NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67445 4.0 C 75. NVALUE 0.035 SECTION 67375 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.68 29. 2.68 35. .18 47. 0.18 53. 2.68 60.0 2.68 66.0 2.0 83.0 2.0 109.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67375 1.0 C 0.1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT 67375 2.0 C 29. NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 67375 3.0 C 53. NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67375 4.0 C 83. NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 67375 5.0 C 109.0 NVALUE 0.080 SECTION 67275 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.69 16. 2.69 23. .19 35. 0.19 43. 2.69 60. 2.69 69.0 5.0 69.1 8.0 70. 8.0 70.1 11.0 71.0 11.0 71.1 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67275 1.0 C 0.1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT 67275 2.0 C 43.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67275 3.0 C 60.0 NVAI 11F , 0 OAS NVALUE 0.060 SECTION 67185 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN #$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 4 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.7 0.1 2.7 16. 2.7 23. .2 35. 0.2 43. 2.7 60. 2.7 72. 5.0 72.1 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67185 1.0 C 0.1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT 67185 2.0 C 72.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67185 3.0 C 72.1 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION SW16d 0.0 14.0 0.01 2.71 10.0 2.71 17.5 0.21 29.5 0.21 37.0 2.71 60.0 2.71 60.01 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SW16d 1.0 C 0.01 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT SW16d 2.0 C 10.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16d 3.0 C 37.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT SW16d 4.0 C 60.0 NVALUE 0.025 �SEGMENT SW16d 5.0 C 60.01 AVALUE 0.012 SECTION SW16u 0.0 14.0 0.01 2.72 10.0 2.72 17.5 0.22 29.5 0.22 37.0 2.72 60.0 2.72 60.01 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SW16u 1.0 C 0.01 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT SW16u 2.0 C 10.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16u 3.0 C 37.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT SW16u 4.0 C 60.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16u 5.0 C 60.01 NVALUE 0.012 COMPUTE 68076 SW16u 68076 ------------------------------END OF DATA LISTING------------------------------ I COMPUTE 68076 SW16u 68076 ------------------------------STARTING DATA FROM GIVEN ELEVATION------------------------------ I WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS 4N PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN $$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 5 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68076 DA: 2770.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP PT Qn FT !`GQ GI nnnoI 8Tu TnT81 nCM CI GV QI nor WTnTW a 1 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.1 28.0 124.8 .00 .00 .00 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 10.7 621.6 2770.0 .00 .00 .00 1.00 6.3 .00081 109.5 2 10.7 621.6 2199.9 .00 .00 .00 .79 5.7 .00051 109.5 3 10.7 621.6 1999.9 .00 .00 .00 .72 5.5 .00042 109.5 4 10.7 621.6 1800.0 .00 .00 .00 .65 5.2 .00034 109.5 5 10.7 621.6 1910.0 .00 .00 .00 .69 5.3 .00038 109.5 6 10.7 621.6 1600.0 .00 .00 .00 .58 4.9 .00027 109.5 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 68076 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 C C C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 2770. 3. 51. 288. 958. 1200. 269. 1. VELOCITY FPS 5.59 .83 1.77 2.69 4.79 7.08 2.40 2 DISCHARGE CFS 2200. 3. 41. 229. 761. 953. 214. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.44 .66 1.41 2.14 3.81 5.63 1.90 3 DISCHARGE CFS 2000. 2. 37. 208. 692. 867. 194. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.03 .60 1.28 1.94 3.46 5.11 1.73 4 DISCHARGE CFS 1800. 2. 33. 187. 623. 780. 175. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.63 .54 1.15 1.75 3.11 4.60 1.56 5 DISCHARGE CFS 1910. 2. 35. 199. 661. 828. 186. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.85 .57 1.22 1.85 3.30 4.88 1.65 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1600. 2. 29. 166. 553. 693. 155. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.23 .48 1.02 1.55 2.77 4.09 1.39 1 ELEV 10.7 KD 97241. 91. 1567. 10084. 33783. 42282. 9434. 2 ELEV 10.7 KD 97241. 91. 1567. 10084. 33783. 42282. 9434. 3 ELEV 10.7 KD 97241. 91. 1567, 10084. 33783. 42282. 9434. 4 ELEV 10.7 KD 97241. 91. 1567. 10084. 33783. 42282. 9434. 5 ELEV 10.7 KD 97241. 91. 1567. 10084. 33783. 42282. 9434. 6 ELEV 10.7 KD 97241. 91. 1567. 10084, 33783. 42282. 9434. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS __- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN $*CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 6 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION GRADd DA: 2770.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 1 10.7 499.0 2770.0 .00 .06 .06 1.00 5.9 .00039 55.0 2 10.7 498.5 2199.9 .00 .06 .06 .79 5.3 .00025 55.0 3 10.7 498.4 1999.9 .00 .06 .06 .72 5.1 .00020 55.0 4 10.7 498.3 1800.0 .00 .06 .06 .65 4.9 .00017 55.0 5 10.7 498.3 1910.0 .00 .06 .06 .69 5.0 .00019 55.0 6 10.7 498.2 1600.0 .00 .06 .06 .58 4.6 .00013 55.0 iSEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION GRADd SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 2770, 2770. 1. VFLOCTTY FPS 5 5h 5 55 1. VELCciTy FPS 4.42 4.41 3 DISCHARGE CFS 2000. 2000. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.02 4.01 4 DISCHARGE CFS 1800. 1800. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.62 3.61 5 DISCHARGE CFS 1910. 1910. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.84 3.83 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1600. 1600. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.21 3.21 1 ELEV 10.7 KD 140373. 140373. 2 ELEV 10.7 KD 140210. 140210. 3 ELEV 10.7 KD 140161. 140161. 4 ELEV 10.7 KD 140117. 140117. 5 ELEV 10.7 KD 140141. 140141. 6 ELEV 10.7 KD 140078. 140078. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 7 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION GRADu DA: 2770.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 1 10.8 500.8 2770.0 .00 .25 .25 1.00 6.0 .00039 55.0 2 10.8 498.9 2199.9 .00 .25 .25 .79 5.4 .00025 55.0 3 10.7 498.3 1999.9 .00 .25 .25 .72 5.1 .00020 55.0 4 10.7 497.8 1800.0 .00 .25 .25 .65 4.9 .00017 55.0 5 10.7 498.1 1910.0 .00 .25 .25 .69 5.0 .00019 55.0 6 10.7 497.3 1600.0 .00 .25 .25 .58 4.7 .00013 55.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION GRADu SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 2770. 2770. 1. VELOCITY FPS 5.53 5.53 2 DISCHARGE CFS 2200. 2200. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.41 4.41 3 DISCHARGE CFS 2000. 2000. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.02 4.01 4 DISCHARGE CFS 1800. 1800. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.62 3.62 5 DISCHARGE CFS 1910. 1910, 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.84 3.83 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1600. 1600. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.22 3.22 1 ELEV 10.8 KD 141015. 141015. 2 ELEV 10.8 KD 140328. 140328. • 3 ELEV 10.7 KD 140125. 140125. 4 ELEV 10.7 KD 139940. 139940. 5 ELEV 10.7 KD 140039. 140039. 6 ELEV 10.7 KD 139775. 139775. *****WARNING - SECT. 67815 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 2 AT ELEVATION 2.41 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ***** *****W4PNTNG - SFCT OR!; Kn VAI IIFR RFVFRSFn nN CFGMFNT i AT FI FV8TTnN 1 d 90 V6I IIC nNONGrn Tn Foni QQFVTnuc Va lic tt*tt x#***WARNING - SECT. 67815 KD VALUES REVERSEL, 2" SEGMENT 3 AT ELEVATION 14.20 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE *$#**WARNING - SECT. 67815 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE # M UWARNING - SECT. 67815 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 3 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ##$ *#$$WARNING - SECT. 67815 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $ $****WARNING - SECT. 67815 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 3 AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $# $ 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN $*CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN## ALT: 8 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67815 DA: 2770.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.2 39.0 192.9 .00 .01 .01 24.8 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOMMo 1 10.9 560.2 2770.0 .00 .02 .02 1.00 5.6 .00091 60.0 2 10.8 555.6 2199.9 .00 .02 .02 .79 5.0 .00059 60.0 3 10.8 554.3 1999.9 .00 .02 .02 .72 4.8 .00049 60.0 4 10.8 553.2 1800.0 .00 .02 .02 .65 4.6 .00040 60.0 5 10.8 553.8 1910.0 .00 .02 .02 .69 4.7 .00045 60.0 6 10.8 552.1 1600.0 .00 .02 .02 .58 4.4 .00032 60.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67815 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 2770. 0. 2770. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.95 .00 4.95 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 2200. 0. 2200. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.97 .00 3.96 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 2000. 0. 2000. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.61 .00 3.61 .00 4 DISCHARGE CFS 1800. 0. 1800. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.26 .00 3.26 .00 5 DISCHARGE CFS 1910. 0. 1910. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.46 .00 3.45 .00 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1600. 0. 1600. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.90 .00 2.90 .00 1 ELEV 10.9 KD 91577. 13. 91550. 13. 2 ELEV 10.8 KD 90340. 13. 90313. 13. 3 ELEV 10.8 KD 89994. 13. 89968. 13. 4 ELEV 10.8 KD 89681. 13. 89655. 13. 5 ELEV 10.8 KD 89849, 13. 89823. 13. 6 ELEV 10.8 KO 89401. 13. 89374. 13. MWARNING - SECT. 67755 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 14.20 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ### *****WARNING - SECT. 67755 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $$ $ tx*t#WARNING - SECT. 67755 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS : __-_ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 9 k RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67755 DA: 2710.0 SQ\iiI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0,0 BANK FULL 2.6 44.8 200.2 .00 .03 .03 24.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 11.0 620.3 2770.0 .00 .11 .11 1.00 5.8 .00075 76.9 2 10.9 611.7 2199.9 .00 .11 .11 .79 5.3 .00049 76.7 3 10.9 609.3 1999.9 .00 .11 .11 .72 5.1 .00041 76.6 4 10.8 607.1 1800.0 .00 .11 .11 .65 4.9 .00034 76.6 5 10.8 608.3 1910.0 .00 .11 .11 .69 5.0 .00038 76.6 6 10.8 605.1 1600.0 .00 .11 .11 .58 4.6 .00027 76.5 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67755 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 2770. 0. 1170. 1155. 446. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.57 .00 4.81 4.68 3.42 2 DISCHARGE CFS 2200. 0. 928. 920. 352. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.68 .00 3.87 3.77 2.75 3 DISCHARGE CFS 2000. 0. 844. 337. 319. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.36 .00 3.53 3.44 2.51 4 DISCHARGE CFS 1800. 0. 759. 754. 287. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.03 .00 3.19 3.11 2.27 5 DISCHARGE CFS 1910. 0. 806. 800. 304. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.21 .00 3.38 3.29 2.40 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1600. 0. 675. 671. 254. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.70 .00 2.84 2.77 2.02 1 ELEV 11.0 KD 101000. 14. 42634. 42163. 16189. 2 ELEV 10.9 KD 98868. 13. 41702. 41407. 15746. 3 ELEV 10.9 KD 98261. 13. 41436. 41192. 15620. 4 ELEV 10.8 KD 97710. 13. 41195. 40996. 15506. 5 ELEV 10.8 KD 98006. 13. 41324. 41101. 15567. 6 ELEV 10.8 KD 97217. 13. 40979. 40820. 15404. *****WARNING - SECT. 67710 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 14.20 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE #$ # *****WARNING - SECT. 67710 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $$$$# *****WARNING - SECT. 67710 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ** 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS : �_ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: �- 10 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67710 DA: 2770.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.6 60.8 189.9 .00 .06 .06 59.8 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 11.2 886.9 2770.0 .00 .11 .11 1.00 5.0 .00034 102.2 1) 11 n a4a a Liao a nn ii 11 '10 e 4 nnnoz 11)1) n 4 10.9 858.8 1800.0 .00 .11 .11 .65 4.2 .00016 l'u-2 5 10.9 861.3 1910.0 .00 .11 .11 .69 4.3 .00018 101.9 6 10.9 854.4 1600.0 .00 .11 .11 .58 4.1 .00013 101.8 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67710 r SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 2770. 0. 759. 962. 1050. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.14 .00 3.29 3.21 2.94 2 DISCHARGE CFS 2200. 0. 601. 767. 832. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.55 .00 2.67 2.60 2.39 3 DISCHARGE CFS 2000. 0. 546. 698. 756. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.33 .00 2.44 2.38 2.18 4 DISCHARGE CFS 1800. 0. 491. 629. 680. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.11 .00 2.20 2.16 1.98 5 DISCHARGE CFS 1910. 0. 521. 667. 722. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.23 .00 2.33 2.28 2.09 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1600. 0. 436. 559. 604. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.88 .00 1.97 1.93 1.77 1 ELEV 11.2 KD 149479. 14. 40909. 51943. 56613. 2 ELEV 11.0 KD 144690. 13. 39512. 50473. 54692. 3 ELEV 11.0 KD 143270. 13. 39098. 50036. 54123. 4 ELEV 10.9 KD 142014. 13. 38732. 49649. 53620. 5 ELEV 10.9 KD 142689. 13. 38929. 49857. 53891. 6 ELEV 10.9 KD 140886. 13. 38403. 49301. 53169. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN $$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN## ALT: 11 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION I405d DA: 2770.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 1 10.9 504.3 2770.0 .00 .06 .06 1.00 6.0 .00038 55.0 2 10.8 500.6 2199.9 .00 .06 .06 .79 5.4 .00024 55.0 3 10.8 499.4 1999.9 .00 .06 .06 .72 5.2 .00020 55.0 4 10.8 498.4 1800.0 .00 .06 .06 .65 4.9 .00016 55.0 5 10.8 498.9 1910.0 .00 .06 .06 .69 5.1 .00019 55.0 6 10.8 497.5 1600.0 .00 .06 .06 .58 4.7 .00013 55.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION I405d SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 2770. 2770. • 1. VELOCITY FPS 5.50 5.49 2 DISCHARGE CFS 2200. 2200. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.40 4.39 3 DISCHARGE CFS 2000. 2000. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.01 4.00 4 DISCHARGE CFS 1800. 1800. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.61 3.61 S nTgrHAPPF rFC iQln 1Qin 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1600, 1600. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.22 3.22 1 ELEV 10.9 KD 142249. 142249. 2 ELEV 10.8 KD 140937. 140937. 3 ELEV 10.8 KD 140511. 140511. 4 ELEV 10.8 KD 140149. 140149. 5 ELEV 10.8 KD 140344. 140344. 6 ELEV 10.8 KD 139859. 139859. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS v PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$ ALT: _! 12 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION I405 DA: 2770.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 1 10.9 504.3 2770.0 .00 .11 .11 1.00 6.0 .00038 55.0 2 10.8 500.0 2199.9 .00 .11 .11 .79 5.4 .00024 55.0 3 10.8 498.6 1999.9 .00 .11 .11 .72 5.2 .00020 55.0 4 10.8 497.4 1800.0 .00 .11 .11 .65 5.0 .00017 55.0 5 10.8 498.1 1910.0 .00 .11 .11 .69 5.1 .00019 55.0 6 10.8 496.5 1600.0 .00 .11 .11 .58 4.7 .00013 55.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION I405 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 2770. 2770. 1. VELOCITY FPS 5.50 5.49 2 DISCHARGE CFS 2200, 2200. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.40 4.40 3 DISCHARGE CFS 2000. 2000. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.01 4.01 4 DISCHARGE CFS 1800. 1800. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.62 3.62 5 DISCHARGE CFS 1910. 1910. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.84 3.83 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1600. 1600. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.23 3.22 1 ELEV 10.9 KD 142252. 142252. 2 ELEV 10.8 KD 140731. 140731. 3 ELEV 10.8 KD 140241. 140241. 4 ELEV 10.8 KD 139821. 139821. 5 ELEV 10.8 KD 140047. 140047. 6 ELEV 10.8 KD 139480. 139480. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 13 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION I405u DA: 2770.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT **********SiNIOd UN3 SO NOISN31X3 IVJIIdjA NO U3SV8 NUI1VlfldWOJ IJ V-F A8 VIVO A3WIS SUj3JXj 9 ON 3113Odd**********JNINaVM **********SINIOd ON3 30 NOISN3IX3 1VOI183A NO 03SVB NOIIVIndWOO 'I3 0'£ A8 VIVO A3A8nS S0333X3 S ON 31I308d**********9NIN8VM **********SINIOd ON3 30 NOISN3IX3 IVOII83A NO 03SVO NOIIVIndWOO '13 0'2 A8 VIVO A3A8AS S033OX3 4 ON 31I3Oad**********9NINaVM **********S1NIOd ON3 30 NOISN3IX3 1VOI183A NO 03SVB NOIIVIndWOO 'I3 0'2 A8 VIVO A3Hns S03333 £ ON 31I308d**********9NIN8VM **********SINIOd ON3 30 NOISN3IX3 1VOIMA NO 03SVO NOIIVIndWOO 'I3 T'£ A8 VIVO ARM S033OX3 Z ON 31IJO8d**********9NINHM **********SINIOd ON3 30 NOISN3IX3 1VOIIM NO 03SV8 NOIIVIndWOO '13 Z'£ A8 VIVO Alms S033OX3 T ON 31I30ad**********9NIN8VM 0'SL 9Z000' L't 85' 80' 80' 00' 0'0091 9'6I9 COT 9 0'SL 92000' O'S 69' 80' 80' 00' O'OT6T T,tz9 COT S 0'SL Z2000' 6'b S9' 80' 80' 00' O'008T 2'ZZ9 COT b O'SL 6£000' F S ZC 80' 90' 00' 6'666T 9'SZ9 COT £ O'SL MOO, F'S 6L' 80' 80' 00' 6'66TZ ti'6Z9 O'TT Z O'SL 89000' 6'S 00'T 80' 80' 00' O'OLLZ ti'T49 T'IT I *****WOI108 13NNVHO W08J AldV3NI1 03IVlOdH INI MO11 '31I30ad ISKA M0139 A313 -39VSS3W***** CtL 80' 80' 00' T'OZLI 2'86£ 6'L ONa9 MO1 ****001108 13NNVHO WOa3 AIMNI1 031V10dd31NI M013 '31I10ad ISNI3 M0138 A313 -39VSS3W***** 0'6Z ZO' ZO' 00' F MT O'Sb L'Z 11f13 me 0'0 0'0 Z' 0 1j 13/I3 13 13NNVHO 39VWVO HIOIM RO1S A313 WSO 1V101 NIV1dOOO13 SAO 13 DS I3 d0l M013 NOII M IIaO 9NIMIS -------030001J S380V------ 0 V3UV A313 ON ------------------------------- 00' =3300 INOO 00' =3300 dX3 IW DS O'OLLZ =VO SW9 NOI103S M 31SUI 9NIIH ti :11V *09IS30 13NNVHO 9NIi33NNO3** Nnb H19T MS 01 ARH O'Z NOISN3A 06/TO/TT AR 39Vd : SM ----> NOIIIONO3 039V <---- PS3 99:LI:tiT 26/tiZ/£0 03X ZdSM I ***** DIVA SflOIA38d 1Vf1D3 OI 039NVH0 3f11VA 08'9T NOIIVA313 IV I IN3W93S NO 03SH A36 SHIVA ON SbVL9 '103S - 9NINNVM***** ***** 3nlVA Sf10IA38d IM03 01 039NVHO 3nlVA OV'ST NOIIVA313 IV T IN3W93S NO 03SH3A38 SHIVA ON SW9 'I03S - 9NINaVM***** '86962T '86962T ON 8'0T A313 9 • 9S£O�I 9S2OVT ON 8'OT A313 S '9600tT '96001 ON 8'01 A313 t '6LSOPT '6LSOVT ON 8'OT A313 F 'LFITtT 'LFTTtT ON COT A313 Z 588Ztii S88Ztl ON 0'11 A313 T ZZ'F ZZ'F Sd3 AIIOO13A 'I '009T 009T SAO 39dVHOSIO 9 28'2 28'2 Sd3 AII0013A 'I 'OT6T 'OT61 SAO RMOSIO S T9'2 Z9'£ Sd3 AII3013A 'I '008T '0081 SAO 39M OSIO b 00,# TO't Sd3 AIIOO13A 'T OOOZ 'OOOZ SAO 39MOSIO £ 62't 6£'t Sd3 AII0013A 'I 'OOZZ 'OOZZ SAO 39M OSIO Z Ws et'S Sd3 AII3013A 'T 'OLLZ 'OLLZ SAO 39NVHOSIO T ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ O T 1V101 WSO ON 93S n906I NOI103S 80J 319VI IN3W93S O'SS 2T000' L't 85' IT' IT' 00' 0'009T T'L0 8'OT 9 O'SS 6T000' I'S 69' TT' IT' 00' O'OT61 6'866 8'OT S 0'SS LI000' O'S S9' TT' TT' 00' O'OOST U ht 8'OT t O'SS OZ000' Z'S ZL' TT' IT' 00' 6'666T 9'66b 8'OT £ O'SS tZ000' t'S 6L' IT' IT' 00' 6'66TZ T'TOS COT Z 0'SS HOW 0'9 001 IT' IT' 00' O'OLLZ 0'90S FIT I SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67445 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 C C C C ----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I DISCHARGE CFS 2770. 0. 1134. 1118. 519. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.39 .00 4.62 4.50 3.52 2 DISCHARGE CFS 2200. 0. 899. 891. 410. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.55 .00 3.74 3.64 2.85 3 DISCHARGE CFS 2000. 0. 817. 811. 372. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.25 .00 3.42 3.33 2.60 4 DISCHARGE CFS 1800. 0. 735. 731. 334. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.94 .00 3.09 3.02 2.36 5 DISCHARGE CFS 1910. 0. 780. 775, 355. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.11 .00 3.27 3.19 2.49 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1600. 0. 653. 651. 296. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.63 .00 2.76 2.69 2.10 1 ELEV 11.1 KD 105851. 14, 43305. 42735. 19797. 2 ELEV 11.0 KD 102670. 14. 41941. 41641. 19074. 3 ELEV 10.9 KD 101654. 14. 41506. 41290. 18844, 4 ELEV 10.9 KD 100807. 14. 41143. 40997. 18653. 5 ELEV 10.9 KD 101262. 14. 41338. 41155, 18756. 6 ELEV 10.9 KD 100082. 14. 40833. 40746. 18490. MUWARNING - SECT. 67375 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $ $# $*MWARNING - SECT. 67375 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE # $ 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN* ALT: 15 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67375 DA; 2770.0 SO MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.0 29.8 95.3 .00 .03 .03 20.7 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 11.3 865.9 2770.0 .00 .17 .17 1.00 5.2 .00038 103.1 2 11.1 844.4 2199.9 .00 .16 .16, .79 4.7 .00026 102.6 3 11.0 837.6 1999.9 .00 .16 .16 .72 4.6 .00022 102.5 4 11.0 831.8 1800.0 .00 .16 .16 .65 4.4 .00018 102.4 5 11.0 834.9 1910.0 .00 .16 .16 .69 4.5 .00020 102.4 6 10.9 826.7 1600.0 .00 .16 .16 .58 4.2 .00015 102.3 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67375 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 C C C C C - --------- --- ----- -- ---- ---- ---- --- - ----- -------------------- 1 DISCHARGE- -------- CFS 2170.-----------0.---------862.---------846.---------474.----------88. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.43 .00 3.47 3.36 3.58 .94 2 DISCHARGE CFS 2200. 0. 683. 675. 773. 69. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.79 .00 2.81 2.74 2.91 .77 3 DISCHARGE CFS 2000. 0. 620. 615. 703. 62. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.56 .00 2.58 2.51 2.67 .70 4 nTCrNARrF rFC IRnn r ;;a cqh Ail 5� 5 DISCHARGE CFS - 1910. 0. 592. 588. 671. 59. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.45 .00 2.47 2.41 2.55 .67 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1600. 0. 496. 493. 562. 49. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.07 .00 2.09 2.04 2.16 .57 1 ELEV 11.3 KD 142518. 14. 44323. 43567. 50090. 4524. 2 ELEV 11.1 KD 137102. 14. 42535. 42126. 48171. 4257. ' 3 ELEV 11.0 KD 135410. 13. 41977. 41674. 47572. 4174. 4 ELEV 11.0 KD 133466. 13. 41501. 41287 47060. 4104. 5 ELEV 11.0 KD 134743. 13. 41757. 41495. 47335. 4142. 6 ELEV 10.9 KD 132710. 13. 41087. 40951. 46615. 4044. $****WARNING - SECT. 67275 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 2 AT ELEVATION 2.89 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $ $ **$$$WARNING - SECT. 67275 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE # $$$$$WARNING - SECT. 67275 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $ $ 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS : ___ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN $$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$ ALT: �- 16 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67275 DA: 2770.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.7 48.7 214.4 .00 .06 .06 27.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 11.2 629.8 2770.0 .00 .16 .16 1.00 5.8 .00078 70.6 2 11.0 616.9 2199.9 .00 .16 .16 .79 5.3 .00053 70.5 3 11.0 612.7 1999.9 .00 .16 .16 .72 5.1 .00044 70.4 4 10.9 609.2 1800.0 .00 .16 .16 .65 4.9 .00037 70.4 5 10.9 611.1 1910.0 .00 .16 .16 .69 5.0 .00041 70.4 6 10.9 606.2 1600.0 .00 .16 .16 .58 4.7 .00029 70.4 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67275 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 2770. 0. 1927, 718. 125. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.65 .00 4.65 4.95 1.78 2 DISCHARGE CFS 2200. 0. 1532. 568. 99. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.77 .00 3.77 4.01 1.45 3 DISCHARGE CFS 2000. 0. 1394. 516. 90. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.45 .00 3.45 3.67 1.33 4 DISCHARGE CFS 1800. 0. 1255. 464. 81. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.12 .00 3.12 3.32 1.21 5 DISCHARGE CFS 1910. 0. 1331. 493. 86. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.30 .00 3.30 3.51 1.28 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1600. 0. 1116. 412. 72. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.79 .00 2.79 2.96 1.08 • 1 ELEV 11.2 KD 99122. 14. 68972. 25660. 4477. 2 ELEV 11.0 KD 95890. 13. 66804. 24746. 4326. 3 ELEV 11.0 KD 94870. 13. 66120. 24458. 4279. 4 ELEV 10.9 KD 94005. 13. 65539. 24214. 4238. 5 ELEV 10.9 KD 94471. 13. 65852. 24346. 4260. 6 ELEV 10.9 KD 93255. 13. 65035. 24003. 4203. *****WARNING - SECT. 67185 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $ $ $ MOWARNING - SECT. 67185 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 3 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE �$ $ $***$WARNING - SECT. 67185 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $$# WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS PAGE ~' REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN $*CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGNU ALT: 17 �y RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67185 DA: 2770.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.7 48.8 205.8 .00 .06 .06 27.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 11.3 656.1 2770.0 .00 .15 .15 1.00 5.8 .00069 72.0 2 11.1 639.9 2199.9 .00 .15 .15 .79 5.3 .00047 72.0 3 11.0 634.8 1999.9 .00 .15 .15 .72 5.1 .00040 72.0 4 11.0 630.4 1800.0 .00 .15 .15 .65 4.9 .00033 72.0 5 11.0 632.7 1910.0 .00 .15 .15 .69 5.0 .00037 72.0 6 10.9 626.5 1600.0 .00 .15 .15 .58 4.7 .00027 72.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67185 SEG NC CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 2770. 0. 2770. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.23 .00 4.23 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 2200. 0. 2200. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.44 .00 3.44 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 2000. 0. 2000. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.16 .00 3.15 .00 4 DISCHARGE CFS 1800. 0. 1800. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.86 .00 2.86 .00 5 DISCHARGE CFS 1910. 0. 1910. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.02 .00 3.02 .00 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1600. 0. 1600. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.56 .00 2.56 .00 1 ELEV 11.3 KD 105344. 13. 105322. 8. 2 ELEV 11.1 KD 101053. 13. 101033. 8. 3 ELEV 11.0 KD 99703. 13. 99682. B. 4 ELEV 11.0 KD 98540. 13. 98519. 8. 5 ELEV 11.0 KD 99166. 13. 99146. 8. 6 ELEV 10.9 KD 97522. 13. 97501. 8. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN* ALT: ____ 18 • RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SW16d DA: 2770.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT n � nn nn *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 11.1 554.7 2770.0 .00 .02 .02 1.00 5.9 .00068 60.0 2 11.0 545.2 2199.9 .00 .02 .02 .79 5.4 .00045 60.0 3 10.9 542.4 1999.9 .00 .02 .02 .72 5.2 .00038 60.0 4 10.9 539.8 1800.0 .00 .02 .02 .65 4.9 .00031 60.0 5 10.9 541.2 1910.0 .00 .02 .02 .69 5.1 .00035 60.0 6 10.9 537.5 1600.0 .00 .02 .02 .58 4.7 .00025 60.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SW16d SEG NO 4 CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 C C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 2770. 0. 540. 987. 1243. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 5.57 .00 6.41 3.57 6.41 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 2200. 0. 428. 787. 985. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.50 .00 5.18 2.89 5.18 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 2000. 0. 389. 716. 895. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.11 .00 4.73 2.64 4.73 .00 4 DISCHARGE CFS 1800. 0. 350. 645. 805. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.72 .00 4.28 2.39 4.28 .00 5 DISCHARGE CFS 1910. 0. 371. 684. 854. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.93 .00 4.53 2.53 4.53 .00 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1600. 0. 311. 574. 715. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.32 .00 3.82 2.14 3.82 .00 1 ELEV 11.1 KD 106513. 15. 20739. 37999. 47746. 15. 2 ELEV 11.0 KD 103420. 14. 20096. 37028. 46267. 14. 3 ELEV 10.9 KD 102506. 14. 19906. 36741. 45830. 14. 4 ELEV 10.9 KD 101665. 14. 19732. 36476. 45429. 14. 5 ELEV 10.9 KD 102118. 14. 19826. 36618. 45645. 14. 6 ELEV 10.9 KD 100940. 14. 19582. 36247. 45083. 14. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 19 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SW16u DA: 2770.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.7 48.8 242.7 .00 .04 .04 27.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 11.2 556.4 2770.0 .00 .08 .08 1.00 5.9 .00067 60.0 2 11.0 546.1 2199.9 .00 .08 .08 .79 5.4 .00045 60.0 3 11.0 543.1 1999.9 .00 .08 .08 .72 5.2 .00038 60.0 4 10.9 540.2 1800.0 .00 .08 .08 .65 4.9 .00031 60.0 5 10.9 541.8 1910.0 .00 .08 .08 .69 5.1 .00035 60.0 6 10.9 537.8 1600.0 .00 .08 .08 .58 4.7 .00025 60.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SW16u SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 C C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 2770. 0. 540. 987. 1243. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 5.56 .00 6.39 3.56 6.39 .00 n TOrnnnnr nrO 00nn n 410 701 noc A 3 DISCHARGE CFS 2000. 0. 389. 716. 895. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.11 .00 4.72 2.64 4.72 .00 4 DISCHARGE CFS 1800. 0. 350, 645. 805. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.71 .00 4.27 2.39 4.27 .00 5 DISCHARGE CFS 1910. 0. 371. 684. 855. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.93 .00 4.52 2.53 4.52 .00 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1600. 0. 311. 574. 715. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.32 .00 3.82 2.14 3.82 .00 1 ELEV 11.2 KD 107074. 15. 20855. 38175. 48015. 15. 2 ELEV 11.0 KD 103725. 14. 20159. 37124. 46413. 14. 3 ELEV 11.0 KD 102731. 14. 19953, 36811. 45938. 14. 4 ELEV 10.9 KD 101815. 14. 19763. 36523. 45501. 14. 5 ELEV 10.9 KD 102309. 14. 19865. 36678. 45736. 14, 6 ELEV 10.9 KD 101022. 14. 19599, 36273. 45122. 14. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 ESGR ----> AGED CONDITION <---- WS _ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 20 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- TITLE P-1 CHANNEL PROFILE - PUMP PLANT TO 16TH AVE. ENDJOB ******************************NORMAL END OF JOB------------------------------ 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/24/93 14:17:56 WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: _� 1 ---------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- NDRUN *************************************************************************** SCS WSP2 VERSION 11/01/90 FILE SUMMARY INPUT = age-main.dat OUTPUT = age-main.run DATED 03/24/93 14:17:56 *************************************************************************** i WSP2 XEQ 03/07/88 0;:17:28 WS . PAGE REV 03/14/88 ALT. i * WSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ** *# ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- TITLE ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 TITLE P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft L'W * DESIGN RUN DISCHARGE -2�4.8 i.000 .858 ,7670 ,588 .4521 DISCHARGE -24.8 .2871 .13333 STARTE 72963 5.600 5.4 5.3 5.0 4.8 STARTE 72963 4.4 i3.0 OUTPUT C.Ol M M E N T *********** FRIDGE AT 7TH ST. *************** COMMENT ********# BRIDGE AT OAKSDALE ST• ****#******* CCIMMENT --------DISCHARGES FROM 19s0 TR-20 ---------- REACH 7Z963 3000.0 00000.000 00000.000 REACH 728"=0 lJo00.0 0007J.000 00073.000 'EACH 72700 3000.0 00190.000 00,190.000 REACH 72515 3,000.0 00185,('00j 00185,000 REACH 72300 :'on .0 00215.(K1U 00215.000 REACH 72230 3000.0 00070.0(.'0 00070.000 BEACH 72150 3000.0 00165.000 00080.000 REACH 72/000 3Go0,() 00153.000 00 150.600 REACH 71850 3000.0 00142.000 00150.000 REACH 71750 3000.0 00092.000 00100.000 BEACH 71643 3000,0 0010 3.000 00107.000 REACT. 7i500 3000.0 (10140.000 00143.000 REACH 71385 3,000.0 006:tl,000 00115.000 2`a0.0 u(%75,C;(;(; Oi}135.000 REACH 71250 'EACH 71150 21990.0 Of1,{,()00 0i;i(;u.000 REACH 71050 2990.0 000.35.000 00100.000 REACH 70900 2991020 10.0 150.0 F.EEA:.H 70800 _;i`?.0 100,0 =EACH 70638 299J,0 162.0 162.0 ROAD O-A1;SDL LJ 42.0 4t.O ^EACH 70553 2990.0 43.00 43.00 REACH 7t;. -- ito , ,r 214 .0 1,..0 :,� REACH 70000 28�40.0 440.::'• 440.0 EA:=H 6"790 2840.0 Z10.0 2i0.(; ROAD SEVEN 2.7 67.0 _7.0 ACH f 1655 2 8 40.0 6`Y.0 6',0 REACH 69500 2840.0 155.0 15.0 REACH 6,23500 2840 0 51.0.0 500.0 REACH 68076 2840.0 424.0 424.0 SECTION 7 963 00000.000 000114.000 00000.000-00008.000 00165.0001-00008.000 001c:,5.000 00014.000 ENDTALi WSP2 XEQ 03/0(/88 03:17:28 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 63076 W rAGE REV 03/14/eq P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft RW * DESIGN RUN ALT: 1 9"J ***** WSPZ MICROCOMPUT�R TEST VRSL'N ***** ------------------------------80/1_1,0 LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT 7296;-S 00001,000N 00165.00014.0 `:AL UE :;0000.035 '_i02tj9."tj(j-Oill----i-0 '. .o 0.0 14.0 END TABLE SEGMENT 728 0 00001.000N 28.0 NVALUE 00000.100 SEGMD,i 7:_'890 00002.C 0ON 2Z5, i NVALUE 00000.01, ,,,-3tGMElNT 72890 00003.000N 253.0 NVALUE 00000.1(i0 SECTION 72.700 0.0 14.0 4..0 0a0 �'7y Z17.E; -;__ 22C�.6 0,(i 270.6 14.0 ENDTAFLE SEGMENT 72700 00001.00ON 00042.000 NVALUE 00000.100 SEGMENT 72700 00002.00ON CXJ228.600 NVALL'E tkRj00.035 SEGMENT 7 700 00003.CftN 00270.6001 :VALUE 00000.100 SECTION 72515 00000.V)0 000114.000 00007.500 00011.500 00027.500 00011.500 Otj056.000.00002.000 00064.400-00000.600 00229.400-00000.800 00237.800 00002.000 27::.8 14.0 ENDTAKE SEGM64T 72515 00001.000N 00007.500 NVALUE 00<j00.100 SEGMENT 72515 000412.00ON 00027.500 NVALUE 00000.050 SEGMENT 72515 00003.000N (X,056.(100 NVALUE 00000.100 SEGMENT 72515 00004.00ON 00237.800 NVALUE 00000.035 SEGMENT 7r 515 00005.00ON 00273. 06 P'VALUE 00000.100 SECTION T-' i 00000.ON 06014.060 00017.400 00068,200 00037.400 00008.200 0C;056.000 00002.000 O(j0�4.400-00000.8O0 00072.400-00000.800 (i007 ,400 00002.000 002:38.400 Chi 002.000 00274.400 0 014.txX) EP?DTAPLr SEGM NT '-:,(}1 00Cicil.F tj(iN 0 017.400 .IVALUE 00000.100 SEGMENT 72.30tj 00002.00ON 000 37.400 i WSr_ ;,EQ 0��/O,i;}"3 0:17:28 ESGn WATERSHED AGED CONDIiIiiP1 # PUMP PLANT TO 68076 W3 P'AIGc REV 03/14/9'3 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 6OF+ FW * DESIGN RUN ?ELT: WSPt R'I_.,i1CLM,-UTci TEST rER>}i!t,1 ***** -----------------------------=-101 Ir?ca DATA R i ,.t 0 LIST 'OF JT ------------------------------ NVALUf t100,0.t t T: r� �i r7 �v' F �_�7.4tttil ;tj_i (iti 03".()OON 000•_6a000 NVALUE C000.100 SEGMENT 712,300 06on4.0cf i 00078.400 NVALUE 00000.040 SEGMENT 72.-3 00(xj5,0CiC>y 110233.4Citj NVALUE 00000.100 SEGMENT -` '00 (;i006.000N 00274.400 NV.LUE 00000.100 ECTION 72_,'H0 00000.000 00014.000 00017.400 00008.200 00037.400 00008.200 0tj056.000 00CH02.000 00064.400-00000.800 00072.'toO-0O00O.8tj0 . 00078,400 00002.000 00292.000 00002.000 00326.000 00014.000 EPPDTAFLE SEGMENT f2230 (P:00i.CJ ON CiCfC?1,a40 NVALUE 00000.It' . S�GMENT 7223 U, 00;J03.000N 00056.O00 ` . ' NVALUE 0000.100 SEGMENT 7223V 00004.00ON 00078.400 NVALUE 00000.040 . ^ SEGMENT 72230 00005.O00N 00292.000 _-. NVALUE 00O00.1OV 4JSEGMENT T223O VV006.VV0N 0O326.0O0 NVALUE 0O000.\O0 SECTION 72190 00000.ChX, 00014.000 00017.1100 (008.300 00037.100 00008.300 00058.100 00001.300 00064.100-00000.700 00072.100-000V0.700 00078.100 00001.300 00419.000 O000 .30O 00448.600 00014.000 ENDAKE SEGMENT 72150 00001,O00N 00017.100 NVALUE 00000,100 SEGMENT 721150 00002.0O0N 00037.00 NVALUE 00000,050 SEGMENT 72150 00003.00ON 00058.100 NIVALUE V00OV,100 SEGMENT 72150 0O004.0OON 00078.100 NYALUE 00000.040 SEGMENT 72150 00005.000N 00419.00 NVALUE 0000t).1 1110 SEGMENT 72150 OV0c�6.0(04 00448.600 NVALUE 00000,100 SECTION 72000 0OOOO.0OV VOO14.0OO 000�7.100 O0008.3OO O0O3T.1OO OOOO8.3N) 1 NSP2 XEQ 03/07/88 03:17:28 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 WS : PAGE 00 03/\4/88 P'1 TRlPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft DN * DESIGN RUN ALT- 3 WSR? MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ***** � -��-, ---------------8O/8V LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 00058.100 V0001.300 VOO64.\V*'V000O.700 00072.100-00000.700 000T8.100 00001.300 00448,100 00001.300 00475.100 O0014.000 ENDAK[ SEGMBNT 7210--o' 00001.0001N 00017.100 NVALUE 00000.100 SEGMENT 72000 00002.000N 00037.100 NVALUE 00000.050 SEGMENT 72000 000V3.00ON 00058.1V0 NVALUE V6100O.1N) SEGMENT 72000, 00004.00VN 00078.100 NVALUE 00000.040 SEGMENT 720OO 00005.0O0N 00448.100 NVALUE 00000.00 SEGMENT 72NW 0*06,0OON 00475.100 NVALUE N000.1N) SECTION 7185V 00000.O0O 00014.CWO 00017.100 00008.3O0 00037.100 00OO8,300 00058.100 VV001,3O0 00064.100-00OV0.700 00072.100-00000.700 00078.100 00001.300 00358.100 00001.300 00406.100 00014.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 718-55Q 00001.000N 00017.100 NVALUE 00000.10,0 SEGMENT- 71;850 0002.000N 00037.100 `NALUE 00000.050 -^5EGMENT 711850 00008.00ON 00058.100 NVALUE O100V .100 SEGMENT 71850 00004.VV0N 00078.180 NVALUE 00000.040 SEGMENT 71850 00005.00ON 00358.100 NVALUE 00000,100 OOOOO.NN �0l4.0V0 OV017.�0 000V8.�0 VO037.100 OOV08,3VO 0V058.100 00001,300 00064,100-00000.700 0Nff2.100-00000.700 VVOT8.1-00 00001.300 00256.200 0000 .300 00308.260 00014.000 ' ENUTkBLE cc'GME0T 71�15 ol 0VOO1.00ON 000l7.10O NVALUE 00000,00 SEGMENT 71750 00002.00ON O0O37.1OO -- NVALUE 00000.0-50 SEGMENT 71750 001,103.000N 06058.100 NVALUE CH.10001.100 SEGMENT 71750 00004.00ON 00078.100 NVALUE 00N0O.01,40 1 WSP2 XE4 08/O7/88 03:17:28 ES8R WATERSHED * AGED C0NDlTl0N * PUMP PLANT TU 68076 NS : PA8E REV 03/14/88 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft BW * DESIGN RUN N'T: 4 NlCR011-OMPUTE8 TEST VERSION ***** - ' - ------------'80/80 LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 1 71750 00005.00ON 00256.200 INIVALUE 00000,100 SEGMENT 71750 000O6.0O0N 00308.200 NVAL� 0Of,)OO,100 SECTl0N 71643 00000.000 60014.000 00016.800 00008.400 V0036.800 00008.400 O��.800MO1.4(* N063,800-000V0,600N0T11.800-04000O.600 O00T7.800 000011.400 00210.800 O0001.400 00250.800 00014.000 ENDTABLE SEGNENT 71643 OOWO1.OV0N 00016.800 NVALUE 00000,1W `SE G MENT 71643 00002.O0ON 06036.800 �NV�LUE OVOOO'�� SEGMENT 71643 VO003.00ON 00057.8O0 NVALUE 00000.100 SEUT,iENT 71643 OVOO4,00ON 0007T.8O0 NVALUE 00000.�� SEGMENT T�643 OV0O5,O0ON O0210.80O NVALUE �0C0.1OO SEG�ENT Ti643 0O0V6,O0ON 0025O.80V NVALUE O00VV.1O0 SECTl0N T15O0 OVOVO.*N 00014.000 00016.800 00008.400 00036.800 00008.400 00057.800 NNO1.400 00063.300-00000.600 00071.8*0-OO000,60O 0W7.� V�1.�N ��.� V�1.� ��.� �14.� ENDTA8LE S[GMENT 715OO 000O1.000N 16.80V WALUE N0000.l� SBMENT 715OO VO010-7.VO0N 00036.8O0 NVALUE V0O00.050 SBGMENT 71�0 00003.OV0N 00057.800 NVAILUE 00000. 00 SBGMENT 7150V O00O4.0OON 00077.800 NVALUE 00000.040 SEGMENT 71500 00005.000N N�63.8O0 NVALUE 00O00.1O0 .SE��T 71�O ��6.�0N 00-79 .8� 1V8LUE OVOVO.1O0 ECTl0N 71385 000O0.NJC 00014.000 06V16.8O0 00008.400 00036.800 00008.400 00O57.3 O,0 0V0O .4O0 00063.800-0O000.600 00071.800-00000.600 0007T.0N VOOO1.4VO 00397.800 00001.400 004201.800 60014.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 7�15 VO0O1.V00N 000 6.8V0 RE v .),}f 14i•S6 P'1 tllf•''S i:,Al". .. AFir3CL # r-<<i!E 4 IBU uE511iiti huN ?{i:. .� **# WSP3 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION # * -----------------------------=a0/:;) LIST !iF INPUT DATA------------------------------ rr(•�pC�r f�•nc r y( (� ,7�1 !y(�� _y r ,1L41'If!'�1 7s_�t?:J �j(1f}t!�aLr1.J!Y (006 NVALUE (}C)v00.05U SEGMENT 71.385 00003.00ON 0t1C}F7,E")0 NVALUE OtHM.100 SEGMENT 7i:K5 00004.00 N 00077.800 NVALUE CXJ000.040 SEGMENT 71385 00005.000N C1397.8W NVALUE 00000.100 SEGMENT 71335 000016.000N 00429.c((j0 NVALUE 00000.100 SECTION 71250 OC600.000 00014.000 00016 _C.'0 0060 .400 00023E,,(3C)O 00008.400 00057,800 UflC1�`11.4U0 0006:,3,80()-00{}00,6.00 OV077. 00 60001,400 400 00457.800 00001.40C) t`)4S'a._;C, 060114.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 71250 00001.00ON C)00 i of.300 NVALUE 00000,1(j0 SEGMENT 71L50 0000�.WON 0000,800 NVALUE 00000.050 SEGMENT 71,250 00003.000N 00057.800 NVALUE C0000.100 SEGM-2dT 71250 00604.00ON W07T.8(h1 N';ALUE 00000.040 SEGMENT 71150 00(105.000N 0(?4:57.a00 NVALUE 00000.1fl0 EGi Etdi 71250 00006.000N 0048='.C(00 N7.VALUE 00000.100 SECTION 71150 0(000.000 00014.000 0001b.500 00608.5-0(0 00036.500 00008.500 00057.500 57.5u 00001.500 500 0 f 063 F!t 0 j0 00 0,e)71.500-00000.5C 0 (10017,.00 0il061,500 00455.500 01=001,_r(}(j 06487.50:} 060j.«,(00 ENI,T AF"LL E_ SEGMENT 71150 (10001,OOON 0001 r,5i)i} NVALUE OC1000.100 r- r cr c's'! ,trbtENi 71150 0(}00 .c1U(j,� C))i13 ,_rt ! NVALUE 00000.050 3EGME'T 71150 00003.0-00N 00057,50*0 INVALUE 00000.100 SEGMENT 71150 00004.0001 00077.510 NV-LUE 00000.C40 SEGMENT 71150 00005. r)i) t)C>'iKl -Al NVALUE 00000.100 SEGMENT 71150 00006,000N 064°7,5VO NVALUE 00000.100 f ram.: r: 7 n,+ •i� C -C�r! �. :,TT1 i n� r rr. r• C C:. i War2, XEQ 0310r/_wI 0_, 17;Z_ =SGR WATERSHED AGE, -ONDI1 vN * PUM;' r�ANI 1+r ftt)7 W, PAGE REV 03/141(K3 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 4,Ft BW * DESIGN RUN ALT• . �* 'rr ES. Ti�?Ur�� �:4i=�__I'iin 1C� Ie: _?t.ra N � 1 =-----------------------------`0/30 LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ "d 00000.000 00014.000 00016.500 0(OOQJ.Sj;(1 (jii(36.500 00008'.500 0057.500 00001.500 00063.500'00C)v0.500 00071.500-00000.500 0007 7.5-JO C,?111.5Q0 00352..500 10001,500 103,04,5+0 00O .fli} ENDIABLE SE(ii+EcPIT 71(150 (')(j()C}l,:.C)O 0C)(11r ,Eno ;"VALUE 00000,10[a �... .. 'aEG:�ENT 7 11 050 CjC)0031.C}C.i 4, OC%1b7.50C) NVALUE O(Y)OO.100 SEGMENT 71CJ50 00004.00ON 00677.500 NVALUE A)00.040 Sra M 10�d C5C 00 0)5.00 N )015t5 NVALUE 70 000,100 �y (y SEGMENT f 1!J50 00006.tiWN V0�iV4.F�ti1 NVALUE W. )OO.100 SECTION 70900 00000.Caf)O 00014.000 06016.500 W1008-.E 0 000:36,500 00008.506 00057.,%0 00001.500 -0063.500-000),500 (W71.5:E10-00000.500 00077.500 00001.500 00249.9100 00001.500 00280.500 00014.000 ENDTABIF SEGMENT 7 0900 00001.O(X N 0,0016.5W NVALUE WOO.100 SEGMENT 70900 00002.000N 00036.560 NVALUE OCA)00.050 SEGMENT 7,')Y_t) 00003.000N 00057.500 NVALUE 00000.100 SEGMENT 70900 00004.060N 00077.500 NVALUE 00000.040 SEGMENT 70900 00005.000N WZ_49.50Ca NVALUE (11"at700.0:35 SEGMENT 70900 C iC 001 .0010N. C)OZ810.500 NVALUE 00000.100 SECTION 70��)0 00000.COO 00014.000 00016.500 00008.5)0 00)=)3 .510 00008.560 00057.500 00001.500 000 3.500-00000.500 000 1.500-00000.500 00077.560 00001.5000018 500 00,001.500 Yt 216.500 00014.000 ENDTA°LE SEGMENT 70800 00001.00ON 00016.tu) NVALUE F10tit?0.100 :nESSC �rT .81,0 l) ' OCION f((.n,coo NVALUE 0000 a.050 i=.lM NT 7's} ij�i C)(_i(}�i_i.(�fjC i'y f'ItiF7, tiifj vAi f i= ijf1Ci00.100 SEGMENT ?t)00. 00,004.00ON 09077.500 +r ui t7q N PUMP FLAti- ;C 62,: /r .LNSt_ u 03/0 /U 1411f _ 0 ,17.�� aut �ATtK . 13E0 Ck REV 03/14/88 F-1 TFIFLE TFsA`, C:A!PEL # _0r` BW # DESIGN RUN ALT: 7 n -,,r� 7rn7 r n7- ##### WSP2 MICROC1MPUTEi; Ica! VERSION -------------- ----u0/ C1 LIST C!F INPUT DATA------------------- ------------ ----------- NVALLE 00000.040 SE`Gi I_NT 70800 OOtj_,,1j.F,. 0.184,.,{._ NVALUE 00000.035 SEGMENT 70.80.1 00iN).3.00CIN 00-216.51J0 NVALUE 00000.100 SECTION T0632 0000O.ClL_0 00014.000 00016.5-00 00008. 0003i;,500 C}{jfifk^_s.6.0 0005E 7.Y!O 00001.600 0C1063.500-C10f)E1CJ.6t jij 0007 `C O- 0 00077.EA)O 00001.600 00117.500 00001.600 00154.5j(4) 00014.,fj00 ENDTAELE SEGMENT 706;,3 00061 0001A.500 NVALUE 00000.100 SEGMENT 70638 00002 00O I),'3 :+tii P.VALUE 00000.050 SEGMENT 70638' 00003".00ON 00057.500 NVALUE 00000.100 SEGMENT 70638 00004.000N 00077.500 NVALUE 00000.035 SEGMENT 7063u 00005.000N 00117.500 NVALUE 00000.035 -_1:'4 r",IT 7Nf"j'! F; , SECTION 0AKSDL ` ^ ' -10.0 19.00 0.00 1Y.0O 18.0 8.6 36.0 8.6 54.0 -0.54 V -0.54 68.0 1.8 10.0 1.8 158.0 19.0 ` 168.0 19.1 E~.�^^ 0� OAKSDL D 1. 7. PIER 1.6 3.5 4.6 1.5 -- GI R,DBR 19.5 19.0 0.0 0.8 2.7 0.0 19.0 0.0 16.5 158.0 16.5 158.0 19.0 8NIDTADLE SECTION 70553 00000.000 00014.000 00016.500 00608.500 00034.500 00008.500 00055.500 00001.500 00061.500-00000,500 00069.500-00000,500 00075.5O0 00001.500 0115.5000 00001.5100 00153.500 00014.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70553 00001.000N 00016.500 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 70553 ' 00002.V0ON 00034.500 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70553 00003,000N 0055.500 NVALUE 0.100 1 WSP2 XBQ 03/07/88 O3:17:28 ESGR kATE SHED * AGBU CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68-076 WS PAGE REV 03/14/88 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP, CHANNEL * 60Ft 8W * DESIGN RUN ALT. 8 ***** NSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION **e* ---------------80/80 LIST OF INPUT DATk--------------- SEGMENT 70553 V0004.VOON 0005.i00 NVALUE 0.035 0553 06605.000N �115.5� NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 70553 00006.VOON 00153.500 NVALUE 0.100 SEC! WOW.�4� 0OV0O.0O0 00014.000 00016.200 00008.600 00O034.200 00008.600 00055,200 00001,60 00061.200-00000.400 00069.200-00000.400 O0OT5.200 00001.6V0 00115.2OO 00011. ( 00152.400 00014.000 BNDTABLE SEGMENT 70440 O0OO1.O0ON 00016,2VO NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 764-46 O0OO2.VOON 06634.200 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 7044V O�03.O00N �055.20O NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 70440 00064.000N 06075,�0 NVALUE O.035 SEGMENT 70440 00005.000N 00115.200 NVALUE 0,035 SEGMENT 70440 000O6.000N OO152.�0 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 700CI0 00000.000 00014.000 00015.900 00008.700 00033.0100 00008'.700 O0V54,9O0 00001.700 0066.900-00000,300 00068.900-00000.300 O��.�O OOOO�.TOO 00114.900 OCKJO1.7flo 00151.8*0 06014.000 �0DTABLE �SEGMENTI 70000 00001.000N 0V015.7KN NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 70000 00002.0,00N NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70000 00003.000N 00054.900 NVALUE 0.100 r�Few FIN T ro^o^ 0000»�oo^w 000�� vo^ ES ENi T0000 0000b.000N (0114.`0_0 \ NVALUE 0.035 SEC+*ENT 70000 00006.00ON 00151.800 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 69790 _ 0.00 14.00 15.90 8.70 33.90 8.70 54.90 1.70 60.90 -0.30 62.90 -0.30 74.90 1.70 114.90 1.70 151.80 14.00 ErITABLE 1 WSPZ XEQ 03/07/k3 03:17:28 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION PUMP PLANT TO 60076 WS : PAGE REV 03/14/88 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft LBW * DESIGN RUN ALT: 9 #* WSPZ MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ****# ------------------------------80/80 LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT 69790 l.()C1 N 15.90 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 69790 'L,.0) N 33.90 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 69790 3.00 N 54.90 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 697'X) 4.00 N 7 4.9 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 69790 5.00 N 114.90 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 69790 6.00 N IF"I 0 NVALUE 0.04 SECTION SEVEN -1.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 13.00 0.70 25.00 8.70 33.00 6.00 5Z.00 -0.,-!o F 60.00 -0.30 66.00 1.74 106.00 1.74 125.00 8.(10 133.00 19.00 135.00 - END1ABLr j BPR SEVEN B 1. 3. PIER 3.76 1.50 1.76 1.50 =RDER 18.(Y. 16.50 0.00 0.80 2.7 0.00 4.0.00 0.00 17.00 133.00 16.00 133.00 19.00 EDTARLE CTION 69655 0.00 14.00 I L 90 0.70 3190 o.70 54.90 1.70 60.90 030 68.90 -1 30 74.90 1.70 114.90 1.70 151.80 14.00 ENDTAFI_E SEGMENT 691655 1.00 N 15.90 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 69655 L.0() N 33.90 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 69655 3.00 N 54.90 NVALUE 0.100 3tcMEiIT 69655 4.00" N i 4.90 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT �G}55 F j' 0 �.r}.t J..�tj N 114.rG NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 69655 6.00 N 151.80 NVALUE 0.1().0 TION 69500 1111JE.Y 00015.900 f 9 � f� l�f l' CKJ00�J.0�J0 t)t)t114.()�)() (..i(}15..,j�� l,(ill,�)U,�(:..) ()i)()�,3,9(){) 00008,300 00054.9()0 00001.300 00060.900-00000.200 00068.900-00000.Z00 00074.90�3 00061.800 00114.900 C�)001.800 00150.800 00014.000 =•SPZ XEQ ON07f L8 03:17:3S ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 -AS . PAGE rv. r c Ft ,i r r RUN i REV (t3/,4-`0o r-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * �,+.)�:. bN * DESIGN �,Uy AST: 10 * WSP2 "ICROCOMPU ER TEST VEnSIUN ------------------------------80180, LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ NDTABLE SEGMENT 69500 00'001.000N Cti)015.900 NVALUE 0.100 fir, SEGM ENT NT6=500 0000�.000N C1')033.9CxO NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 69500 00003.00ON :K J54.1YU NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 69500 00004.OOi�N (0074.900 NVALUE 0.0'a5 SEGMENT 69500 00005.000N 00114.900 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 695E%0 00006.CIOC44 00150.B00 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 69000 00000.000 00014.000 00015.600 00003.900 WO 3.600 00005.900 00054.6('Q 00001.900 00060.600-00000.100 0006-3.600-00000.900 WO71_'.600 00001."00 00114.600 W001.9,)C1 00151.200 00014.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 69000 00001.00ON W015.600 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 69000 00002.000N 00033.600 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 69000 0000 3.000N 00054.600 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 69000 00004.000N 0007Z.600 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 69000 00005.00ON 00114.600 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 69000 00006.O N 00151.2.00 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 6,8500 00000.000 00014.000 00015.-WO 00009.000 00033.300 00009.000 00064.300 00002.000 00060.300 0.000 00068.300 0.100 000F4.300 00002.000 00114.300 00002.060 00150.600 00014.000 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 6.500 00001. r00N 00015.300 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 68500 00002:.000N 00033.a00 NVALUE 0.050 SE GriMc�'N T 03500 0000.:.0001v C= 1_4.10 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 68-OO 00004.000N 0007,.2�10 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 6300 00005.000N 00f NVALUE 0.0-,5 1 WSP2 %EQ 03/07/383 03:17:97-'8 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 Z WAGE REV 031141r88 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft BW * DESIGN RUN ALT: 11 ** WSP MICROCOMPUTER ',EST VERSION ***** ------------------------------801W LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT 68500 00006.000N 00150.600 SVALU'E 0.100 -' ECTION 68076 00000.000 00014.000 00014.700 OW09.100 00032.700 00009.100 00053.700 000'02.100 00059.700 00000.100 00067.700 00000.100 00073.700 00002.100 00093.400 00002.100 00129.400 00014.000 NDTABLE SEGMENT 68'O76 OCnX7i.000N 00014.700 auAt UE O.ltirt ^.AL"c v.v:v ' SEGMENT 68076 60003.0001N O0053.T00 NYALUE O.iO0 SEGMENT 68076 V0004.000N 00073.700 ` NVALUE 0.035 _ SEGMENT 68076 011005.00ON 00943.4000 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 6076 00006.00ON 00129.400 NVA0E 0.100 COMPUTE 72963 68076 T2960 ------------'---------END OF DATA LISTING------------------------ 1 0MPUTE 71Z963 68076 7*11963 -- --- -----'----��RTlNG DATA F�� GIVBN BL'VAT ION--------------- 1 WSP2 XEQ 01,07/88 03:17:28 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 WS : PAGE REV 03/14/88 P'1 TRlPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft 8N * DESIGN RUN ALT: 12 ***** WSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION �*** RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72963 DA=3000.V SQ MI ------------------------------- NO. EL[V AREA Q -----ACRES FLOODED-'---- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLON T0P FT SO FT CFS FL00DPLAlN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT O -8,0 0,0 0.0 ' LOW 8RND -8.O .V .O ,OO .00 .00 ,O .�*****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 5.6 2244.0 3000.0 .00 .00 .00 1.00 -5,8 .00004 165.0 2 5.4 22\1.O 2574.0 .00 .00 .00 .86 -6,0 .00003 165.0 J 5.3 2194,5 2301.0 .00 .00 .00 .77 '6.2 ,00002 165.0 4 5.0 2145.0 17164.0 .00 .00 .04) .59 -6,5 .VOOV\ 1 65.0 5 4.8 2112.0 1356.3 .00 .00 .00 .45 -6.7 .O0OV1 165.0 6 4.4 2V46.V 861.3 ,O0 .00 .O0 ,29 -7.� .000OV 165.0 T 13.0 3485).0 400.0 ,OO .00 .00 .13 -17.4 .00000 165.V 1 �� X� 0/�� �:17:� B� ���� * �� 0�lTl� * �� �� 0 �7 6 WS : PAGE REV 03/14/08 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft LRW * DESIGN RUN ALT: 13 *me* NSP2 MICR000MPUTEK TEST VERSION ***** RATlNG TABLE FOR SECTI8N 728YO DA=3O00.0 SO MI ---------------'------ NO. EL[Y AREA Q ''---XC8[S FLOODED-'--- STARTING CRlT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FL0UDPLAlN TOTAL CSM ELEY SL0PE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL F T FT/FT R O -8.0 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND -8,0 .V .V .00 .00 .00 .O *****MESSAGE- EL[V 8EL0W FlRST PK0FILE. FL0W lN�BPOLATED LINEARLY FR0M CH8NNBL B0TT0M***** 1 5.6 2616.4 3000.0 .00 .00 .37 1.00 '5.9 .00003 219.4 ` 2 5.4 2.571,9 2574.0 ,00 .00 ,37 .86 -6.1 ,00002 218.6 3 5.3 2549.6 2301.0 .00 .00 .37 .77 -6.2 .0OOV2 218,2 4 5.0 2484.1 \764,O .VO .00 .36 .59 -6,5 ,00001 2D.V 5 4.8 244O.7 1356.3 .00 ,OV ,36 .45 -6.7 .0000 216.2 6 4.4 2354.3 861.3 ,00 .00 .36 .2Y -7.1 ,00000 214.6 7 C].0 4347.0 "Ito 0.V .00 .00 .42 .13 -T.4 0OVOO '249.0 1 �� � �� �;1T:� B� WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * �� P� 0 �� � : PAGE IV �/1A inr, P'1 �l� �P, �� * (-',(,Ft � * �l� RUN At Tg 14 GATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72700 DA=3000.0 SQ MI • ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES F_VJDC ------- STARTING '_fFT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DP,IMIAGE CHANNEL FT F T fFT FT LOW GRIND -3. ' fll, .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 ****MESSAC•E- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 5.6 177Z,2 3000.0 .00 ,00 .96 1.0 -1.5 .00009 220.2 2 5.4 17217.9 2574.0 .00 .00 .96 ,86 -1.7 .00007 219.0 5.3 170 3 2 301.0 .00 .00 .95 .77 -1. J �'a'J 8 .0000 -;°.4 v J.•1 4 5.0 1641.5 1764.0 .00 .00 .94 .59 -2.1 .00004 216.6 5 4.3 159E'.4 1356.3 .00 .00 .94 .45 -2.3 .00003 215.4 6. 4.4 1512.0 861.3 .00 .00 .93 .29 -2.7 .Ot)001 213.0 7 13.0 3566,3 400.0 .00 .00 1.15 .13 -3.0 ,00000 264.6 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/07/88 03:17:28 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * POMP PLANT TO 68076 WS : PAGE REV 03/14/88 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft BW * DESIGN RUN ALT: 15 WSPZ Ot'M UT EUR TESVcRSDON RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72515 DA=3000.0 SQ MI ------------------------------- Nip. EELEV AREA i�a ------ACRES FLOODED------ STARTING GRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP LLL± FT SQ, FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0.0 LOW ORND -A .0 .0 .00 .00 ,00 .0 r• .- .•F ram- r s r r-: r i i- BOTTOM***** *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 5.6 1179.4 3000.0 .00 .00 .86 1.00 1.3 .000,3.: 203.4 5.4 11.39.4 2574.0 .00-0 .00 .86 .86 1.1 XOOZ7 2023 5.3 1119.3 2'an.0 .00 .00 .86 .77 1.0 .00023 201.6 4 5.0 1059.0 1764.0 .00 .00 ..6Z. .59 .7 .00016 :99.11-11 5 4.8 1=7 1356.3 .00 .00 .84 .45 .5 .00011 198.6 6 4.4 90.0 861.3 .00 .00 .83 .29 .1 .O()OO6 1962 7 13.111 2379.4 400.0 .00 .00 1.14 .13 -.2 X0000 267.8 1 WSP2 ;EFL 03/07/83 011713 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 WS . PAGE REV 03n4M8 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft BW * DESIGN RUN ALT: 16 ,..,.. WF`:: MICROCOMPUTER TEST L'LRbl_tN �•=�#** RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72300 D;=300 .0 SQ Mi ------------------------------- N!. ELEV ?;!':L' Q ACRES FLOODED STARTING{S14 L•it=1 FRICTION FLOW !1' FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 0.E` 0.0 LOW GRND .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 6. ?' ; OO ' .Cu 0 11.03 1.00 3.'3 .00453 207.9 0 °1 re,2 2574.0 .00 .00 1.02 .86 3.6 .00407 206.3 5.8 787.1 2301.0 .00 .00 1.01 .77 3.5 .00364 205.4 4 5.4 707.6 1764.0 .00 .00 1.00 .59 3.2 .00293 203.1 5 5.2 648;0 1356.3 .00 .00 .99 .45 2.9 . 0224 201.3 6 4._ 545.3 861.3 .00 .00 .913 .29 2.6 .00149 198.2 7 13.0 2509.1 400.0 .00 .00 1.32 .13 2.3 .':0000 268.4 i bqDT "Ci! itgm7op n1 17 1P t-"f_n• 1.!iT_`J^4CP. 8 ci=_n P.1'aMT'r M 4 4WD N AW Tn 4=74 up . ='K_ +� WSPZ MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION r FO T 3 DA=30 M1 . RATING TABLE rC�,��, SECTION a�G•_�.1 tF�-:Cx�C%.fi E;t ------------------------------- ir 1 NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING GRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT Sty FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSN ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DANACE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.8 0.0 0.0 LOW CRND -.8 .0 .0 ,tki .00 .00 .0 �***MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL CB'TTu-iM***** 1 6.6 1202.2 3000.0 .00 .00 .42 1.00 3=5 .0.'-41 263.1 6.3 1120.8 2574.0 .Ctrs .00 .42 .86 3.4 XOZ19 Z61.3 3 6.1 1071.3 2301.0 .00 .00 .42 .77 3.2 .04ZO2 2600.2 4 5.7 953.0 1764.0 .00 .00 .41 .59 3.0 .C E01.8 257.5 5 5.3 N2.0 1356.3 .00 .00 .41 .45 Z.8 .00135 255.4 6 4.8 715.1 861.3 .00 .00 :41 .29 12.5 .00094 :25Z.1 7 13.0 3082.8 400.0 .00 .00 .51 .13 2.3 .00000 320.2 WSPZ XEQ ONO 88 03:17.28 ESCR WATERSHED * ACED CONDITION.* PUMP PLANT TO 68076 ,2 : FACE FEY 03143:� t-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL NANx e * h t FW DESIGN RUN ALT: 18 #*** WSPZ MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION s**#* RATING TABLE FOR S':'.TIOF1 72150 LA=3000.0 St, MI ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING GRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CF5 FLOODPI LAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DA Pill AG_ CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.( 0.0 (110 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOWINTERPOLATED LINEARLY Y t� CHANNEL BOTTOM*'M ***$* 1 _.- Z12 .3 3000.0 .00 .00 a_ 1.0= 2.5 .OD036 390,:4 6.5 1991.5 2574.0 .00 .00 .71 .86 2.4 .00033 388.8 - 6.3 1909.7 2301.0 .00 .00 .71 .77 2.- .O00 0 387.7 4 5.8 1718.8 1764.0 .00 .00 .71 19 :..1 .00025 335.1 �:. 5 .:5.:. 156 1.�!}9,i�. i.=�rh,} }Cf .00.00 ..tJ .'t:' . i%. 0 01 383.0 .= INC4 =61.2 .00 .00 .N 19 i.8 .00013 379.7 13.0 4710.8 mk.0 .00 .00 .01 .13 1.5 .t)f)OOO 443.1 1 WSt 2 A ON07M@ =:17:2,_ ESGR WATERSHED AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT c,_:.r WS PAGE - t o n t TOP. E t q N - ... qr F;EJ C;_�11�+('_, P-1 TRIPLE Trr+;-. CHANNEL * b!%F _�1 * DESIti: *,Lt'# ;.�T: 19 WSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ***** RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 7 000 DA=3000.? SQ MI ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AR=A Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT 5Q CT 'FS CLCfDPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH H DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.7 0.0 0.0 LOW CRNID .7 .0 .C% .00 .Uri .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.0 2326.Z 3000.0 .00 .00 1.44 1.00 Z.4 -00061 419.1 6.6 2181.2 2574.0 .00 .00 1.44 ,C 00 55 417.3 - 6.4 2089.6 6 2301.0 .00 .00 1.43 .77 212 X0050 416._ q =r 1878 � 1764.0 ,+00 .00 1. Z .59 2.1 00041 413't `� S�Ji�-vi 1 - 1�3n- \ 503T.4 4VV.O .O0 .00 L62 .000V0 47V.O ' *****WARNING - SECT. 71050 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT! 1 TEL T O 9,3 V0E CA - 0 EQUAL PREVIOUS 'VALUEme� 1 WSK XEQ 03/0T/38 0:17:2.8 BGR WA��� * �� 0�lTl� * �� P� � &� � ; �� ' K� 0/\4/88 P-1 �lPB ��. ��N� * 6�t � * �SI� R� A�: 0 - WSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSl0N ***** RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71850 UA=3O0V.O SQ MI -----'- --'--------'------- NO. ELEV AREA q ---'-ACRBS FL000[0---- STARTING C8lT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FL90DPLAIN T8TAL CSM ELEV SL0PE NlUTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 ',7 0.0 0.0 LOW GRNU .7 .O .O .00 .0O .00 .O *****MESSAGE- EL[V BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LlN AKLY FROM CHANNBL KTTOM***** 1 T.1 l877.8 30OO.O .00 .OV 1.17 1.00 2.6 ,OOO94 339.2 2 6.7 1757,9 2574.0 ,00 ,0V 1.16 .86 2,5 .0VO85 336.8 3 6.5 1682.1 2301.0 ,00 .00 1.15 .77 2.4 .0O078 335,3 4 6.0 1507.7 1764,0 .00 .00 1.14 .5Y 2,Z .V0O65 331.7 5 5.6 1369.1 1356.J ,00 .00 1.13 .45 2.O .0O052 328.Y 6 4,9 1155.1 861.3 .00 .00 \.1Z .2Y 1.8 .0N�5 ��.5 7 13.O 4O97.8 4VO.O .00 .V0 l,38 .�3 1.5 .0000O 3YY.3 eeW�NlNG - SECT. 717� � VALUES ��R�DON ���T 1 ATE�VATI0N 9.30 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ��* 1 WSP2 XEQ V3/07/88 03�17:28 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CUNDlTlUN * PUMP PLANT T0 68076 NS : PAGE REV 03/14/8.8 P-1 TRlP� TRAP. CHANNEL * 60;:t ESW * DESIGN RUN &LT/ 21 ` MICR0C0MPUTEB TEST VERSION ***** RATING TABLE FOR SECTlON 71�0 DA=3000.0 SQ MI ------'-- --'-'-' '----'- - NO. �£V AREA Q -'---ACRES FLOODED-'-' -- STARTING CRlT FRICTION FL0W TOP FT SQ FT CFS FL00DPLAIN TOTAL C M ELEY SL0PE WIDTH DAMAGiE CHANNEL R FT/FT R 0.0 LON GRND '.7 .O .V .00 .00 .00 .V ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERP0LATED LINE- FROM CHANNBL D0T��***** 1 7.2 1310.4 3O0O.0 .00 .00 .55 1.00 3.1 .00180 239.7 2 6.8 1225.6 25T4,0 ,0V .00 .54 ,86 2.9 .00162 ��.1 3 6.6 1171.6 230L0 .00 .O0 .54 .77 2.7 .00148 235.5 4 6.0 1048.0 1764,0 .00 .00 .53 .5Y 2.5 ,0O123 C. 5 5.6 Y49.2 1356.3 .0V .00 .53 .45 2.3 .00OY8 228.7 6 4.9 798.1 ��.3 ,00 ,00 ,51 .2Y 2.V ,00O67 �4.V 7 13.0 2927,V 4VO.V .00 .00 .69 .13 1.6 .00000 301.1 *****WARNING - SECT. 716� � VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 � E��Tll-N 9.46 VALUE CHANGED 70 EQUAL PREVl0U'S VALUE *�* I NISP2 XEQ0/07/� ��17:� B� ��� * �� 0�ITl� * �� �� 0 �� � / �� R V 03/14/8-:30 P-1 TRIPLE T AP. CHANNEL Ft B41i * DESIGN RUN ALT: 12 �P2." MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ee* RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71643 DA=3006.0 SQ M{ ---------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q --'-ACRES FL08DED---- START NG OBT FR�Tl0N FL0N TOP CTS FT CF ����lN ��L C� �� ��E NI 00 LOW GRAD .rt .0 .i}rJ .(J.) ,.)i_) ,() **MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPC+LATER LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.3 1038.6 3000.0 .00 .00 .47 1.00 3.5 .00249 139.4 2 6.9 970.3 25714.0 .0() .00 .Y� .3• 3.� .00225 18.7.� 6.71 946.2 2301.0 .00 ,60 .46 .77 3.1 .0012 6 135.f i 4 6.2 326.1 1764.0 .00 .00 .45 .5' 27-.3 .00171 1E,2.4 5 5.7 745.5 1356.3 .(H7 .00 .44 .4❑5 2.5 .00133 lf9.6 6 5.0 622.3 861.3 .t10 .00 .43 .29 Z.L .00095 175.3 7 13.0 2311.6 4(6.0 ,Oc) .00 .+3i) ,13 1.8 ,060111) 44.6 *****WARNING - SECT. 71500 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT i AT ELEVATION 9.40 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE #**** 1 WSP- XEQ 03/07/38 03:17:23 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 63076 WS : PAGE REV 0:3/14/8-3 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 6OFt BW # DESIGN RUN ALT: 23 ***** WSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ****# RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71500 L,A=?i;f C.+3 =0 `°1I ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRiT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT FT CFS FLOODFAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV ;LOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.6 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND -.6 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.6 1�116.9 30v0.0 .00 .00 ._10 1.11(t 3.1 .00I:33 244.2 2 7.2 1320.9 2574.0 .00 .00 .73 .36 2.9 .00122 1237.4 3 7.0 I253.3 2301.r0� .00 .00 .f7 .77 2.3 .0011'c� 4 6.4 1119.4 i764.0 .00 .fin .7• .59 2.6 .l)00?5 �s3 :'F ,:i ,0i} .00 .76 .45 2.4 .00073 230.1 5 5.9 1005.3 1 6 5.1 334.9 361.3 .00 .00 .74 .2'9 2:.1 .000=16 _:_6.1 7 13.0 23711 460.0 ,00 .00 .95 .i 3 1.7 .00000 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/07/its 03:17:23 ESGR WATER`HED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO o307, WS : PAGE REV 0:3/14/-'3 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * r=--(+Ft BW * DESIGN RIUN ALT: 24 *_*** WSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ***** RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 7`05 DA=30(K).0 SQ MI ------------------------------- i ELEV h .ter ,-. �r �.=r �f. .7 T i -P NO. ELLV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- S A�,itNG GRIT FzITCTDOIN FLOW TO FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT LOW GRND -.6 .0 .? .00 ­0 ,06 n****MESSA+ - ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.3 2314.L :jl)()iJ, ?{) 1.:%1 l.0(,i .'J(i1Q1 2 7.4 2156.2 2514.0 .00 .00 .93 .26 .__ .()+i0''l 373.i 3 7.i 20F3,9 301.0 .00 .00 .93 .77 _.4 .C)037 :371.5 4 6.5 1824,E 1764.0 .00 .00 .97 .59 2.2 .00074 368.1 5 6,0 16314 I - 1356.3 .00 .00 .96 .45 2.1 .00062 365.3 6 5.2 1355.6 ;61.:'• .00 .O0 .95 .29 1.9 .O004o 351.O 7 13.0 4438.8 400.() .00 .00 1.12 .13 1.6 .-:J000 424.3 *****WARNING - SECT. 71250 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 9.40 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/07/':K3 03:17:23 rSGR. WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 WS . PAGE REV 0:3/14/88 P-1 TRIPE TRAP, CHANNEL * 60Ft BW * DESIGN RUN ALT: 25 #4-44= i,IlF`;% tt?! 'I I�'I I ITh TC^T 1 PPL UIN RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71250 ` DA=2990.0 SQ 01I ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACMES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLO(DPLA%P� TOTAL CSM =-_. SLOPE 'WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT11FT FT i LOW GRND -.6 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 n**#*MESSAGE- ELtV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.9 272?.1 Zj30.0 .00 .00 1.38 1.00 2.5 .00069 444.9 2 7.4 2540.9 2565.4 .00 .00 1.35 .86 2.4 .00064 4.3.4.0 7,2' 42420.0 Lc9..3 .00 .00 1.34 .77 2.3 .00059 *,1.9 4 6.5 21149.3 1758.1 .00 .00 1.33 .59 2.1 .0O,'51 0.4 5 6.0 1927.7 1351.8 .00 .00 1.32 .45 2.0 .00043 425.5 6 5.2 1594.7 8.58.4 00 .00 1.31 .c9 1.8 .00032 421.1 7 13.0 5135.0 398.7 .00 .00 1.50 .13 1.6 .00000 484.3 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/OT/88 03:17:28 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 WS : PAGE REV 03/14/88 P-1 TRIFLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft BW * DESIGN RUN ALT: N ***** WSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ***** RATING, TABLE FOR SECTION 71150 DA=2990.0 SQ MI ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.5 {:.tr 0.0 LOW GPNnD -.5 .0 .0 .0(1 .00 .00 .0 �Y . *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.9 268'°. 2990.C} .00 .00 1.00 S.00i 2.6 .001C18 433.6 7.5 2501.7 2565.4 .00 .00 .99 .ro'6 Z.5 .00100 4:il.c T.2 2380.5 2293,3 .Ci0 .0�i ."_ .7? 2.4 .00094 0094 429.E 4 6.6 2109.4 1758.1 .00 .00 .9,3 .59 2.2 .00081 42r.; 5 6.0 1886.8 1351.8 .00 .00 .97 .45 2.1 .(Y)068 423.2 F F r.F. ,('t( Cih 29 .0 F i i; n 5.2 1v 3.0 ro'58.4 .00 _ .�, l.ri v1 �1_.•i T 13.0 5064.9 398.7 .00 .00 1.11 .13 1.17 .00004) 482.0 i WSP2 XEQ 03/07/88 0-3;17:23 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 WS PAGE REV 03/14/.'{3 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 6O t BW * DESIGN RUN ALT: 27 *** WSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ***** n T TAn3 r r-.r rC r�- �� nA+ING +r:e�� r«t SECTION 71'"J5U DA=2�.�1,Ci u MI ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW T 0 P FT SQ FT C'.FS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.5 ".0 0.0 LCfW GRND -.5 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 =****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.9 ZO41.(; 2990.0 .Oo .Of') .76 1.00 2.9 .00187 330.8 ^- F 89 F F F 8 `• ` ?.� ic:yd.9 2.�6..�.4 .00 .00 .7� .e+� .? .00172 �Z8,4 ? 1606.42- o ^ ( ,Ciii 77 ?,r ,t}Cih ' •',,�i 7.t Li9J.•: .00 .? .r 1.1 _ 4 6.6 1599.5 1758.1 .00 .00 .74 .59 2.4 .00139 323.3 5 6.1 1429.7 1351.8 .00 .00 .74 .45 2.2 .00117 320,3 6 5.3 1175.6 858.4 .00 .Cii) .T3 .2'' ?.i} .Ci00=7 315." 7 13.0 388Ci,1 ."191-j.7 .00 .00 .87 .13 1.7 .00C1C10 37rr.O WSP2 `� i 0 `) 3 03: 28 rWATERSHED * D C.OP ITTT t ION * PU`�P PLANT TO 6a T6 W� r,A'GE { E 3f�Tl�_ i7: ESGR AGED dLT+,._. +t C. F fir }i/t l"D p-I TPTG!C Tr SD rLIAMAJIP x Gf`L -- # � WSPZ MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION *# RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 709M DA=2990.0 SQ Mi ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA rt ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP ir FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.5 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND -.5 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7, 1.81.1 L990.0 .�''0 .001 .7 1.tx? _ .(025 _G 7.3 L 7.5 1283.3 2565.4 .00 .00 .77 .86 3.1 .00023 225.0 3 7.2 1220.1 2293.3 .00 .00 .77 .77 3.0 .00022 Z23.4 4 6.6 1079.0 1758.1 .00 .04 .59 L.7 .0U<?19 220.0 5 6.1 963.6 1351.8 .00 .00 .75 .45 2.5 .00016 217.1 6 5.3 791.5 852.4 .00 .s'?0 .73 .29 2.2 .00012 2712.7 7 13.0 2.89.9 398.7 .00 .00 .95 .13 1.8 .000 0 275.0 1 WSPZ XEQ 03/07/88 03:17:28 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 60.076 Wo' : PAGE REV 03/14/88 P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 65t BW * DESIGN RUN ALT: 29 ***** WSPZ MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION #**** RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70800 DA=Z990.0 SQ MI ------------------------------- NBA. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL GSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.5 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND -.5 .0 .0 ,00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.9 956.7 2990.0 .00 .00 .37 1.00 3.8 .00056 162.6 T 5 Ai. ! •2565 s..t 8��.,.� ���h.4 .00 .00 .37 .86 3.e• .040051 160.3 7.2 844.7 y 27-c.3 .010 .00 .36 .77 3.4 .C*048 1rt'.8 4 6.6 746.5 1753.1 .00 .00 .36 .59 3.1 .00041 15-55.3 5 6.1 666.5 135i.8 .00 .00 .35 .45 Z.8 .00034 152.4 6 5.3 547..E ES53.4 .00 .00 .34 .29 Z.4 .00026 148.0 7 13.0 1947.5 39 .7 00 .00 .48 .13 1.9 .00000 Zii.0 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/07/_°8 03:17:28 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 WS . PAGE REV 03/14/ _' P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft BW * DESIGN RUN ALT: 30 *'*** WSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ***** RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70638 DA=2990.0 SQ MI ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.6 0.0 0.0 LOW GPND -.6 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.7 509.4 2990.0 .00 .00 .36 1.00 5.2 .002Z' 96.5 2 7.3 474.2 2565.4 loo .00 .35 .86 4.8 .00204 94.4 3 7.1 451.7 2293.3 .00�0 .00 .35 .77 4.5 .00187 ' _ 4 6.5 399.9 1758.1 .00 .00 .33 .59 4.0 .00154 2-30.5 5 6.1 357.5 1351.8 .00 .00R .32 .45 3.6 •001• _• '_ 'i nLjE:, .`nth; L<R EQUATION IF AN * BOWL APPEARS BESIDE A VARIABLE IN THIS iABLE,IT IS EXTRAPI.L ATED FROM FIGURES 6,7,10, OR 34 OF THE BPR MANUAL. NO. M AKB DLT'AK SIGMA DKS COEFK VN2 ALPHA ALPHA2 ALPHAS AENIT AP'PAR DCRIT GRIT FPS SQ FT SQ FT FT COEF i f ...100 00 12 .00 .00 .12 5.76 1.44 1.44 1.42 511.68 547.34 5.22 .00 i 1.00 ,00 .11 s�.00 ._?0 .i1 5.•.,0 1.41 s.41 1.39 4.5.56 506.43 4.86 NO K oo .00 ,it 1,0i i .00 .11 4.97 1.40 1.40 1.33 452.49 Q0.55 4.63 .00 4 1.00 .00 .11 1.00 .00 .11 4.30 1.36 1.36 1.34 319.64 424.66 4.12 .00 5 1.00 .00 .10 1.00 .00 .10 3.70 1.3.3 1.33 1.32 356.33 376.90 3.6 .00 6 1.00 .00 .09 i.OO .00 .09 2.87 118 1.26 1.28 291.23 303.72 3.07 .00 }0 7 1.00 .00 .11 1.00 .00 .11 .35 1.79 1.79 1.78 1184.36 1208.37 2.38 .00 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/07/38 0 :17:28 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 WS : PAGE REV 03/14/, P-1 TRIP_E TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft BW * DESIGN RUN ALT: 31B ** WSP2 MIC:4OCOMPUTE91 TEST VERSION t**** WOAD SECTION OAKSDL ------------------- 'STARTING BRIDGE BRIDGE CULVERT CULVERT WEIR WEIR WEIR NO. HW CFS HL TW cSM CFS AREA CFS AREA CFS AREA TOP WIDTH FT FT FT SQ FT SQ FT Sri FT FT 0 -.54 0.0 0.00 -.54 OwOO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ON 0.0 10 1 7.97 2990.0 .18 7.79 1.00 2990.0 519.1 .0 .0 .0 ,0 .0 2 7.56 2565.4 .14 7.42 .86 2565 A QC 3 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 7.29 2293.3 .2 7.17 .77 2293.3 461.3 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 4 6.69 1758.1 .10 6 Z9 59 1758.1 409.2 =`' .0 .0 .0 .t} 5 6.16 1351.8 .06 6.10 1351.8 365.6 It .0 .0 .0 ,0 ] r 'I 65.36 'J50s4 .�.+4 }.-.JL ,29 L�I.1. 299.6 =:i .0 .0 ,0 .0 13 AZ 398.7 .02 1100 .13 398.7 1146,0 .0 .0 . .0 .0 MIN ROAD ELEVATION = 19.00 FT BRIDGE TYPE = BFR GIRDER BOTTOM ELEVATION = 19.00 FT OPENING NO.= 1 s WSP2 XEQ 03/07i=8 03:17:28 ERR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * POP PLANT TO 68076 WS . PAGE REV 03/i4 88 P-1 TRIFLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft BW * DESIGN RUN ALT: 32 **�*•* WSrZ MICROCOMPUTER BEST VERSION ***** EATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70553 DA=2990.0 SQ MI ------------------------------- MO, ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLtOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW KIP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.5 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND -.5 .0 .0 .00 NO .00 .0 *x** ESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM..**** 1 8.0 55f).c 2990.0 .00 .00 .19 1.00 5.1 .00186 99.5 7.6 t}r,2 '565.4 ,00 .00 .19 ,:;F. 4.7 .001?0 97,0 7,4 4:'2.7 ::2`-3.3 .00 .00t .19 .77 4.5 .00157 95.3 6.7 4'25.3 1758.1 .00 .00 is .59 3,9 .Cttll_.t} 91.7 5 6.2 377.2 ----•- .tit) .t:=: .17 .45 3.5 .=.0109 .;,-_,Y � w�rz xcq �Vo//VV o��u�uu �um� wx|cxunu/ * «uc.0 comuiuun k runr m mm/o »m : ra3t REV 0/14/8,'-', P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft BW * DESIGN RUN ALT: � NSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ***** .'` RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70440 DA=2640,0SQMl ___-____________- N0. ELEV AREA Q --''-8CRFS FLOODED ----- STARTING CRlT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT S0 FT CFS FL0ODPLAlN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT V -.4 0.0 0.0 LOW G8ND -.4 .V .V .00 .00 .00 .O *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 1913 566.2 2840,0 .00 .00 .26 1.00 5,1 .00155 100.3 2 7,9 521.3 2436.7 .00 .VV ,25 .86 4.7 ,00143 97.5 3 7.6 492.2 2178.3 .00 .00 .25 .77 4.5 .00134 95,8 4 6.9 431.6 1669,9 .00 .VV .24 .59 3,9 .00113 91.9 5 6,3 380.0 1284.0 .00 .*) .23 .45 15 .O0OY6 88.4 6 5.5 3O7.2 05.4 ,OO .OV ,22 .29 2,9 .00071 83.3 7 13.0 105.O y8,7 .00 .00 .38 .13 2.2 .00OOO 146.5 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/07/39, 03,17:28 BGR WATERSHED * AMD 0NDlTMN * PUMP RLANIT TO 6807-6, WS : PAGE REV 03/14/88 P'1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft BW * DESWN RUN ALTZ 34 *ee WSPZ MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ee* RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70000 DA=Z340,0SIQM[ ________________ N0. [LEY AREA Q ---ACRES FLOODED----'- S7ART}NG 0RlT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FL00DPLAlN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 '.3 0.0 0.O LOW GRN8 -.3 .V .0 .00 .OV .00 .O *****MESSAGE- ELEV DELUW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 8.9 623.9 3V,0 ,00 .00 1.23 1.0V 5.2 .00121 121.4 2 8.4 568.1 2436.7 .00 ,OO 1.15 .86 4.8 .00113 113.5 3 8.1 534.9 2178.3 .00 .OV 1.07 ,TT 4.6 .00107 105.4 4 7.4 464,5 IM19 .00 ,00 .95 .59 4,0 .00092 94.0 5 6.7 405.1 1ZS4.0 .00 .00 .91 ,45 3.6 .00080 910.1 6 5,8 323.6 815.4 .00 .00 .85 .29 3.0 .0N0,1 84.5 T 13.0 11T0.4 W81 ,00 .00 1,47 .\3 2.3 .00000 145.9 \ W7ZXEQ O /O7R8 03q718 BGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 WS - PAGE REV ONi4� P'l TORE TOP. CHANNEL * 6OFt � * DESIGN RUN ALT: 35 ***** NSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION **e* RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 69790 DX`2844.).0 SQ NI ------------------------------- NO. 8-EV AREA Q ' '- 'ACKES FLOODED------- STARTING C8lT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT Sq FT CFS FL0ODPLAlN TOTAL CSN ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT O -.3 0.0 0.0 LOW 6RND '.3 .O .0 .00 .0V .OV .V *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FL0W- lNTERP0LATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 9.2 660.0 2840.0 .00 .00 .59 1.00 5.2 .00096 123.2 2 8.7 594.4 2436.7 .00 ,OO .58 ,86 4.8 .00091 119.9 5 6.Y *20.+ USX .oV .v0 .++ .1 o .00vo/ wl.2 ' ` ^ 6 5,9 334.3 815.4 .00 .00 .41 ,29 3,0 .00053 85.3 7 13.0 117O.6 378.T .00 .00 .70 .13 2.3 .00000 145.9 � TABLE OF VALUES FOR 8PREQUATION ,-_ IF AN * SYMBOL APPEARS BESI0E A VARIABLE IN THIS TA8L[,lT IS EXTRAPOLATED FROM FIGURES 6,7,10, OR 34 OF THE BPR MANUAL, -- NO. M AKB DLTAK SIGMA UKS C0EFK YN2 ALPHA ALPHA2 ALPHA3 AEX[T APPAR DCRlT CRIT FPS SQ FT S0 FT FT CLEF 1 1.00 .VV .OY 1,00 .00 ,09 4.30 1.54 1.54 1.35 667.91 670.37 5.25 .00 Z 1,00 .00 .09 1.00 ,00 .09 4.0 1.48 1,48 1.31 601.81 604,27 4.88 .00 3 1.00 .00 .09 1.00 .00 .09 3,87 1,45 1,45 1.30 564.94 566.92 4.63 .00 4 1.00 .00 ,09 1,00 ,00 .09 3.43 1.40 1.40 1.27 488.46 490.33 4.10 .00 5 1.00 .00 .09 1.00 .00 .09 3.04 1.36 1.36 1.24 424.61 426.48 3.67 .00 6 1,00 .00 .00 1.00 ,00 .08 2.43 1.3* 1.30 1,22 337.23 "MI Y1 3.05 ,00 7 .99 .00 .08 1.00 .00 .08 ,35 1.78 1.77 1.49 117012 lR310 213 .00 \ WSP2 XEQ 031071'K5 03:17:28 BGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 '14!6 : PAGE REV OW1488' P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft BW * DESIGN RUN ALT. 36B **e* WSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ***** ROAD SECTION SEVEN ------------------- STARTING BRIDGE BRIDGE CULVERT CULVERT WEIR WEIR WEIR. NO. HW CFS HL TW CSM CFS AREA CFS AREA CFS AREA 0P WIDTH FT FT FT SQ FT SQ FT SQ FT FT ' O -.3* 0.0 0.00 -.30 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 9.31 2840.0 32 919 1,00 2840.0 660.2 .0 .0 .0 .V .0 -- 2 8.78 2436.7 .02 8,76 .86 2436.7 599.4 .V .O .O .0 .0 3 8.42 2178.3 .02 8.4V .T7 2178,3 562.8 .V .O .V .O .O 4 7,64 1669.9 .02 7.62 ,59 1669.9 486.9 ,V .V .V .0 .0 5 6.96 1284.0 .02 6.94 .45 1284.V CIO .O ,0 .0 .O .0 6 5.97 05,4 .02 555 .29 815.4 335.3 .V ,V .O .0 .0 7 13.05 378.7 .02 13.03 .13 378J 1OYT.4 .O ,V .O .O .0 ` MIN ROAD ELEVATION = \YAO R BRINE TYPE = WR GIRDER BOTTOM ELEVATION = 16.50 FT OPENING N0.` 1 l ISP2 XEQ 08/07/88 03:17:28 ESGK WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 WS : PAGE REV 03/14/88 P'\ TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 60Ft BW * DESIGN RUN ALT: 37 *e** WSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ***** RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 69655 DA=2840.0 SQ Ml - --' --- --------''----- NO. BLEV AREA Q -----ACRES FLOODED ---- STARTING CRlT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FL00DPLAlN TOTAL CSN EUEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.3 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND '.3 .0 .O .00 .OV .00 ,O *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL E:',0TT0M***** I Y.4 678.9 2840.0 .VO .00 ,38 1.00 5.2 .00099 124.1 2 8.8 612.3 2436.7 .00 .00 .37 .86 4.8 .00093 120.8 � ^ ` 5 �.� 430.Y l284.O .00 .0V .28 ,45 3.6 ,OVV67 Y1,8 ' ^ 6 6.O 342.0 8\5.4 .00 .0V .27 .2Y 3.O .0N�2 85.8 ` 7 13.O 1D3,6 378,7 .00 .00 .45 .\3 2.3 .00VVV 146.0 1 WSRZXEQ 03/0/0.8 03":17:26 BGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 68076 WS : PAGE '^^ REV �X14/88 P-1 �DPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * 6OFt BW * DESIGN RUN ALT. 38 - WSP2 NICR0C0MPUTER TEST VERSl0N ***** RATINIG TABLE FOR SECTION 69500 �=21-lltn.V SQ NIT ----'---------------- N0. ELEY AREA Q -'-'-ACRES FLOODED--''--- STARTING CRlT FRICTION FLOW T0P FT SQ FT CFS FL00DPLAlN TOTAL CSM EL[V SLOPE NlDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 LOW G8ND .0 .0O .00 .00 .0 *****MlESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROMCHANNEL BOTTOM***** i 9.5 683.5 2840.0 .*0 .00 .44 1,00 5.3 .00097 124.0 2 9.0 616.1 2436.T -CO .00 ,43 ,86 4.9 .00091 12O.7 3 8.6 575.2 2178.3 .00 .00 .41 .77 4,7 .00087 115.1 4 7.8 496.1 1669.9 .00 .VV .34 ,59 4,1 .00076 95.9 5 7.1 430.4 1284.V .00 .0O .33 .45 J.7 .0O067 91.5 6 6.1 339,8 815.4 .VV ,00 ,30 .29 3.1 .00053 85.5 7 13.V ���.7 3T8.T .OV ,OO .52 ,i3 2.4 .00000 115,0 1 �� � �� �:�T�� �� �� * �� 0�ITI� * �� �� � &� � � �� R V 0/l4/8 0j P-1 TRIPLE TRAP, CHANNEL * 6OFt BW * DESIGN RUN ALT. 39 ***** NSP2 MICROC8MPUTER TEST VERSION ***** RATING TABLE FOR SECT I0N 69000 DA`2840.0 SQ MI - --- _-'_--'--_- --------- NO. [L[Y A0EA Q ------ACRES FLOODED---'--- STARTlNG CRlT FRICTION FL0W I U� FT SQ FT CFS FL00�LAIN TOTAL CSM BLEV SL0PE NlDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 '.Y 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND '.Y .0 .O ,80 .VO .00 .O *****MESS�GE- BLEV 8ELOW Fl8ST P��[LE. FL UN lNTERP0LATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL B0TT0M***** 1 1O.0 733.Y 2840.0 ,OO .00 1.46 \.VV 5.3 .00O82 126.8 2 Y.4 661.Y 2436.T 0O .00 1,42 .86 5.O .O0O78 123.3 3 9.0 614.7 2178.3 .00 .00 1.37 .77 4.7 .00074 1lY.6 4 8.2 525.9 1669.9 no .OV 1.14 .5Y 4.2 .0OO66 YY.O 5 7.4 5 1284.0 CO. .00 1.07 .45 3.8 .000�n Y3,3 6 6.3 �".3 815.4 .00 .00 1.00 ,2Y 3.2 .0OV46 86.7 7 C].V 1150.4 378.T .00 .00 l.67 .13 2.4 .00OOV l`.4 \ �P,7� X� V�QK� ��17�2O B� ���H� * �� 0�Dl� * �� ��TT0 ��6 � � �� REV 01114/818 P-1 �lR� T�. �� * 6C)Ft Elvi * DESIGN RUINI ALT 40 ***** NSP2 MICRUC0MPUTER TEST VERSION ***** RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 6-8500 DA`Zu"t .V Q Ml - ------------------------------- ^ NO. [LEY AREA Q ----ACRES FLOODED --- STARTING CKIT FIR ICTI0N FLOW TOP R SQR �� ����lN �� C� �� ��E WlD� DAMAGE CHANNEL R FT/FT FT 0 ,O 0.0 O.V LOW GRND .0 .V ~ � 10.4 768.4 2840.0 .°"� .00 1.4O 1.00 5.5 .00073 128.6 ^ . ^ 2 9.8 692.1 2436.7 .00 .00 1.39 ,86 5.1 .00070 121.2 3 9,4 641.7 2178.3 .00 .00 1.28 .77 4.9 .00067 Ul.3 4 8.5 543,9 1669.9 .00 ,00 1.14 .59 4,4 .00060 99.1 5 7,7 467.8 1284.0 .00 .O0 1.08 .45 3.Y ,O0054 94,4 6 6,6 364.4 815.4 .00 .00 1.00 .2Y 3.3 .00044 O7.5 7 13.1 1�Z.2 378.7 .0O .00 1.66 .%] 2.6 .00000 144,8 1 NSP2 XEQ 0V17/88 03:17:20 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PL�NT T0 68076 WS : PAGE R� 0/14/� P-1 TR[PLETRAP, CHANNEL * 6tvt8W * DESIGN RUN &LT: 41 ***** WSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ***** RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68076 DA=277O.O SQ Nl '--'--------------'---' N0. ELEV AREA Q ----ACRES FLOODED---'-'- STARTING CRlT FRICTION FLOW 0P FT SQ FT CFS FL000PLkIN TOTAL CSN ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT O .1 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .1 .O .O .00 .00 .00 ,O e*0MIE'�23AGE- ELEV FLOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW 114TERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL KTTOM***** 1 10.7~ 618.3 2770.0 .00 .00 1.06 1.00 6.3 .00125 109.3 2 10.1 553.3 2376.7 ,00 ,00 i.O2 ,86 5.9 .00119 105.2 3 Y.7° 51L\ 2��.6 .00 .VO .Y3 ,77 �,� .O0�4 Y5.3 4 8.8° 426.6 1628.8 .0O .00 ,78 .59 5.0 .0002 79.8 5 8.O 364.9 1252.3 .00 .00 .73 .45 4.4 .00090 75.1 6 6.8 �1.7 795.3 .00 .00 .66 .29 3.T .00072 68.0 7 13.1~ 896.1 3369.3 .CIO .0O 1.20 .113 2.8 .00001 1 WSP26 XEQ 0/07/88 03:17:28 ESGR WATERSHED * AGED CONDITION * PUMP PLANT TO 6-8076 WS : PAGE REV �14/� P-1 TRIPLE TRAP. CHANNEL * �t � * �l� RUN �: � ***** WSP2 MICROCOMPUTER TEST VERSION ***** ------------ LlST OF INPUT DATA WITH LlMlTED EDlTING------------ TlTLE P-1 CHANNEL PR0FlLE - PUMP PLANT T0 68O76 EN00 rb END OF JOB----'---'---''--'-- -'--- ` 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/07/238 03;117:28 WS : PAGE - REV 03V14/D88 ALT: � ***** WSP2 MICRUC8MPUTER TEST VERSION ***** ----'------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING-----------' ENDRUN ■ ■■C ' ■ a��' ■■ eoG�. , • , • aye:::":: • . IN0 alms . . :■"■,� eg all s " saaaaGees:= r sa , ■ 2 ■■ ■■ :e , ■Gaa ■=n � ■ . ..e :N ■ _ ::e:1:: : ::. ; :. .■ ONO ■ts . Ga�m��■ . IBM II�■� mum a:s�G s ■:mm:eeso(111taC il.'ll/■a .I�i soils .■�i a::mass s:'::::/ ' �11^°. .;;;;; ■■s; r■ e e ■ : /■■sonNo G■ mossommmmom 'ram ■■■ ■_ m��m •.�1■/■ ■■■■ ■■■:mw ■�■m:am■■fit■■■■/■ ■■■■■■ ■■sl+��I' ■� ■■■■■■■■ ■■■ ■ ■ ■r■/■■■■■■�I■■■MEN a■■■■■■:/t;/►'i�l'ag m■s■r■amr:s■mm:; ' m I:s:e:eGGGGCeG:G:GGGGGGaeGG►!G�'�1 � :: ::G:e:aGG::■ ■ ■ ■ n :a ■ MEN■■■■/■■■�aa■■N■■■■mm■//s■■■■■■■■/■A`■a■►.■■Il 11■� a■�■■mmrss■mm■a _:: '� =gig': :: �:� :..;=8::: E ::: : �_� Swum "a :::_ aaw■m ■/� ■ a�a soss■ ■ :sw■s/� a/:s ■s:■im ■ sim■s■m+m ■ sms■so■ ■MINNG■a as mms■a ■m ■ ■__ ■■ ■ asmmm/.ammmw:m ■ s:Gm .ON ■ ■ OEM III .a ■loom . ■ semw mmm�ime'■sa mem■mmmwm■mms■a: me::a::�� a:e'�G ' �G:0 a a::: a a isCa':a'■:"ie■■:: ::CCC�i'iCC:::': m■mNa ■ ■e wm: s■ ::rm■ : mom ■n .a-- . . ::i . ......I�r■■...a..■/■mm. :.a..: �: . . . s. ■a■: ■sa■ .soon: . as ee ■sme* :a� sa:srmm■s■■1�m.........■m.,�.s......I�... .■■■■s.am.. s> a:a:m: i■ am ■ rm■■m mm■m■N C.i N. o : N. .......I ............!i......w.... . .. ........... ;■ ■ : ■ ; sam■ ; !! /m■ ::■aNmwal►■;sa■■■■■/as■■s■■■■■m■amm:;Gmme■s/m■aa;■■■ ems n a ■ ■ ■ ■■■Haal�m mmNmm■Hmmm■Hmm■ammmmm mo■sommo■a■ ■■■ ■m■;e ■ ;■ : w■mm■mlls■■amm■■s■■■ISO;asi i snommo si'e"'::::' : ■m asm N es : ■ ■ mm is"Eno 0::::::: ::amGGmm :aammasam�■mma'summsrm:n met mm:meaass ■w: ■ s :mmm a ■arw■ mmmm■■mm ■■nseem In eemaBos■msGmmmmommsssom■ssm■ arm: ■/as■■m■rm■■am all a a .� ... . .so■■►i■w:■■a■■aw■a............................... ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■sr■/■■■■■ ■ see ■/ a :H■es■■■■■■■/■■■■■■■■■■as■■t.■■■■■■■■■■■■■■N■■■■■■■■■■■■ .ama■aa■■ss■m;amoasis amw glop 'G:::C/'G:::'I:i■sa:::% s:a:asm�:e:::::e::s::::::::::: :::ss:::a:::: emmmm=m'smml e:o�s mm; mom ; mum;■ ;m;;;s::::r :��■a::::::N:G:Gas:Goss:sG:GG oesGGG:eemGGm ':as■oNimmommams■me■■■o■ :::'=:�rmaesaa:::'G:::i■eea:::s: o■:: ms alin ■e ii1 ■■: s■m�■■msm■m;�� :; o:■ s■ ■N eG/a■m■Go■mGm■ae m■sm m1s1u■■mI■1�■■■o■■em■m■■■■s■■o■m■■m■■m■■m■■a■■w:�eesm■■■ms:r^:a:■■:■m:■mNa■w■m■:■m:■■■s:■■mm■■■/saG:■/w:■sa:■■s:■msa■mmo■s:■mm:■■ma■■ms■■w:■/■■■s■■■o■■m:■■m:■.Gm■■o ;■;;;all■ ■ ;ma �aiiQa:::ease::es:' a: m ::u■ a:e::■ am �Is a ■as■r amasses s■sse■:a ■ ■Na ■ ■ sssmasm : " am MINIMUMS ::_ mm■ G � '.::: mso mm■ � � aG Eno:■■sal■war■a Ma■a■■■■■ ■■■■ ■a■■■■mmo■sr ■■ Man ■ Sam ■ ■ ■ �■ mosmmm ■m■s■mmammm■om■rsommoomm :asom■oomm■m■:s■ alma oNan..w'a:sa s/r �: a•%!a 'eooso� 'Iass:'�i'■::::::aas:s:m:Gs no Norm ME 9 wammmmmnummmmmo in asson ON NMI OEM sC;■;/ ;■: ;s e ■sa aeama'me::m'mG� ';a: mmmmmswmm;H�eml11 s: MEMBER;; / am:sarm/oa:e a ; ;N;■mM o■ ■ C■■: : aosa. m ■ "m ■m ■m sm■Nm■mem: a■C::a ■ . ■■ ;m; mm ;;;. ;;;.; aI=:a: ::; a : sis:eaem a■e ■am■earm■ ■■re■ ■ Oman OEMsommoso e: ma ae : ' ■ ■ : ■G'a a '■'■ ■aaaNN■agar/:"�/smmmGawa■■■■Gaaaam ■wa'mN■■' aroom �Gm'm■is::mii::::o:m■■ . ::G Gmso; '=i' '� 'lea's . ' _ ':G ' :' 'mmse:::Gs:GG::'mm' :m::::: all as a::I■a: un :a s eke:$$e='saCsaeesesGee=esosees:seas::seaoos:sswassoases■om■moomos Si111 Ns� : C ■i■I��:�Hism"�'iso omman:C:ia:m:m■C: .C■::C:::Gee:a::::::G::GGs:: . . _ sssa�ss: nil ME soaoo i a Nao ■Ca ■ :■MENi al as aweooss ■s ■ ■ come ols■:sososms sasooi , • ■ -VERNON� ■ ■a now son laws■ ■ C .so■ mmm Ca.am ,ms■ii � loom ■=C.■iM■N ■�'Jaas l ass ■ ■ ■ . ► ass■ me =■s11 a■ s �� ■ CMMal �M■MCM ■ as Emma■NINE milLismilmismosso 0ooeMslssaIN 0ma o• .mc■■� .. ■ ■ as I ' ■ ■ 'maslsmsem111111 OI ■■ �n aM ■ ' as sM.■Moon omm■.M■■ ■ Emailoe`�■■■ _■ �i ■ .■moms. ammo■■.■■M ■. ■■.■ ■ CCC Ce s. mMmMMMMMMwRs me so mmuses■=.. E■M■ a■ ■ sa■.H.am. e ■■ mma mmmsaoioCa"=a■■■ Ciia■=`rs■ Ci=,Iiii ius=siisii■� e■■■ ■ a=o = aas=moaod::a=aoaooa:os:s=a: o=�a' �":=solssa000ao=: son .oe'� Boss ■�Ma �=�=�=eon isiiisCssssiCsis■■iisNisiiii�iass■.■a■1�■■■■■ ■ .. ■.■.. ae.■■ ■■■NONN oam ■ ■ ■.. .. .■=.■■Enammmmmnm■nm■ms.�r�■ ;a.R�n��.■....■ONES .■■ ...■ ■� . C Cia�l■CCo.■=CC=s. ■■e..■.■.alma■. ■ d■/■a.:ui.m■.■.....■■ Cams CSC% 0000 sss �sssss/■�■.■■Na.a�. ■.■■ ■ MEMO.■.a a Z = 11 MARM o....C■ommommomms me■■!!..■M ap.■s . now . ■ . n �, :iii s : : ■.Mires■r ::::::ii=:::IMMEM i::ISO ass ■ - / ii■iiiiniiiss••la■■i..isms■..■ mms soon■MMMM■MM ■ MMMMHan ■MMM■MWq MlMM■■CM■NEM ma sa�.slssssassaassls sa%� .� C .� ■ ■■la00000'�.oCo'Cloaolo:so.�./..... ■■.■/..■■■■■■... on ■ C ■ ■ .M..v..■.■_■■ .. to a■ .■=■ 0 ■ mass_ ■ _ '�"' 'a�assoa.■■►��1■■■■■m.mN.■■l■Oe...■mE■■■..■■■/.■.■■.■.■■..■ .. O.a■Ma son■ ■ ■ ■ ■ BUSINESSES ■.■■m■■■..■■■■■ IIMMMM■MMMMsnnoes.s■■■■""�■■■s ■■■■■■oamoosossossas%�CCCossssssssssoNosammsslssssssssssssssCsosl mommoomm■ no so ■ ■ ISMC■■me■■■■■■■■■M.■.■■■..■■■■..M.■M..■■■e■■■.■.■■ aCIN■ ■E.EaE ■ • ■e •• • ■ ' m a1isaff aa soma aas■'MCiaslaa:: ao.aasaaaaaoassssaaaasosa MEN sa■m■ss1 ■.s . C. , ■ H■��................■O■leseM.■..■■■MM■M...M■Mee..■■ aoo.aaoloaMMaa■� a la s s :ls=wlmmmmmmmalaasmmmmmELC••••■■M■M..■ MMM■■■ ■e■.M... NNEM. on Na ■ ■n.s. .sM■ Cam■ !!l ingo .��� .gR1.■■.■■ ■ EH.■■■.■.■.M. ..E■■..■.e.e■Ml.MeeM■ ■■ ./ss ■ ■ s ■ ■ ■ : .� ■MN■ ■ MMMM!/ ..e ■ .■...Moe.■/M..Eeae.ge■ aeo O '1 .ia _ aalim�ai iMri'■M■. .CC■'CsM.■�■a.■■■.■E■■MHMe■ueelM■ sm�mssa■ a es m ii �sla sa.Imaasaom■mmm ■■e.M■■■■■..M/.MMMMMMMm.MMMe■ s m a=Mgo a■ W.Ms.s ./MMME ■■Ea■■aa.■■...Mg/.M.■Ma■M.M.e■M■.M...■■aa■gm■ .H mono SON ■.. O ■ OW ■ENE .Oma■■.■aam■■ ■■.�mm■■■a■■..■■pmN/■.■■■oaN■a ■■ . ■M ■ ■.an ma o • ■ ae�OgME M■ms•.. ■Mannesmann Emom sa■r■■■■■■.■■■■■/.■.son■aaN■■M.■ ■ .n ■■ Nunn ■ s.m■ommo■■no■o lasemmmmmm mmmmm ■MM■M■MMN■ _ ■ m■ ■Mmm..ONEs ■■ ■me■Mmass■■Mm■■■■ m. ■mane _ Cam i s = M■■M. M.■..oee.■■■ee. = eaneee■e.■■■■M.■No so MENE■ Ca ■ ■ ■ ■ mmaa s'=i '=i� C masao�i ssassssommon■''im�Nssssssslsummin■e■MMMEN■■■e H.M� ■ M. s ■ ■ qm Eso een o■ mom■ em■.aaIN ■� = M=Nsass ■■■■M..e ■■■Ms.■■■■.e■■e.■Me■a■■■MCC/MEMO■ ■ s nm ■ ms la m aaoasosCmmossemM: os m asamso'ssoosasmmasa■.%o••so ; mmussul ..=Co= Ho s ■oaamal ��o�aa�m■===■.mmN■!.■ammo■ I� SEES an Monsoon NOUNmom EC ■ • m�■■; ■=M==■=Meg■u■■■mme■ ■'ommma■■ma.■■a■in OMEiMmRONNiMsiiiiCiiii■ ■ M sass s P4 ■ /a ■ sr■ ONEsmon"Mm s■ONss■Eses■. Mes C s so CC. ss■ Means 0 No■ ■gsi ■•o ■ aM■ sCMM■MCEC/Mon■ssonM■■C0� oneE■mommos s M■M ..s ..s . ■....... ...■ CC C. CO■.s■mm■■ ■a a as■ ■■ ■ CumMmmosommow■_ .mom■ ■ o■. ■ ■Nam aaa: o' mmoaCCaa'� a■ : = = aa o s .emon oni on munum son a Hmen ■s■■ mo■ nesommossM m■!■■■■■ .sommosMee■n : � ��.. .ee■■'I: : aH Ila: n3: ' • : ■ ■E asan s.. a= =n I l ■ . on soon am ■ ■N�:s a a:s ki■/ as .aM ■ �.■ /■ . ■ C ■ F . SNN ao .■ ■no ■M ■ :;;: :aa �11 ■ a NEI am . ■ . . ■ ■UM /.. on a III..s■ :::a=�,Ca�a s== asom ■ �■ a.: Y ' ■ :as:1'1�NN mom..M..on: a.r. ::N■�� ■ a■a:E■■ _■ S i �■" sass':: !N.■J■■:mall=-■ ■.R ■.:�:■■/sass■ ■�....■. on BO soon ■■■! ..... _ ■ ■■ aE■. ■ ■ ■ .Eon ''i■=.■ ■ ■.Milan = �i■ ■■:� u■■ ■ ■ Cs■�::=C ■ ■ ■ ■.:/ aalloM■ ■ ■Mnaa .. ■ ■ S : ■■Moslemaoa.■t1a.a■ ■:_.. ■■.(!■ ■ ■.E■■..o■■ ■ ■ ■ saaun ■MM■■■■11.■■osa ■nM■M■ :saaM■■■....Mao. as ■ ■ sass::ss::ss:::all:ass=: sl�s:s :sss:s::: Coss:: a■■ ■ J/ a ■ .M.M■NOM■N■EM■■lls .. ■..sJ.■sirs■■■/o■.o■.■ono■!■ ■ ■ S� 1 ' ■■ME sas.s.aall. o a. J.■:�::s: s::s::::::s:■ s : ■ ::s1010-8 s1Sa■ :■■osso.Nosso■ ■ . ■ ■ a■as■s■o■ao.■11 ■.■ as.■■■off■/.: Sasso■M■■.a■■ ��. ■ s „ :: sass■Ess■n■a■■U:��■s�saoo■moscono■as■anosooaona■■ _■ ■ i .�.�aaaaalaoaM.aa11� as o■a//! ".■■nos.. ■oossoEon g : ■ M ■ ■ aaaa ■/■ ENS IIa _■ ■■.. " ■aM=■=■■=■aM■■s■■ Saaa ■.sass■ IIa moss 1 E.■ ■ ■■ ■■■■a..■ :■.■:.:. ...C. s a . ....■■.M■■..■t1■.a..�.t1...................... Sa ■■. ■ a.aa ■ ■ ■■■ Maa ■o�a.S.W■ �aaE■SM■Ea■a..n.■aIl.aSASE.■P,7a..■..■.la.a■/aa■.■aaa ■11111111 :snnsas:ana■ ■ !1 ■M ■ s11 EE ■ !!. C`■a ■■.n..nE.■...■11■■■..■aH■■■■.■■■■■■..■..■■■■■.. ■ a ■ ■ SNJ = =11 ■ ^'■E=rE. /:assaa■aaaaaall■ aaaa■.a■aaE■E■aan.MEaaa.an■.N a: sa ►� 1 ■ ■ ■ r:■i:.;n■.■s■■M.....■■tIn a■o■sos■o■■M.son.■os■n■sonoo■■ MIME=j= a ' : s : s sssaM�J.ssss:: sommoso■■o■■! 11 s a:a� ■ .f .l1a■■■n..■ M.■■■...■UM..■.n.■■■■■n..■oo■no.MMosass■ ■ ■osss'�: � a Moo:.:a �Ea ■ aa■aa SMS■SNEa ■o■Ma ■■■aanaaSuaa mass :0 .... a .. . �� I C ..a .■4. IEsM....:...... .=C.....Cana■M■sMoa■s■a■Mano■. ■M. aM■M■:■IM■� M�M.■a I.tl' .:s �sM, ■S. CM.■M..■■MMM...■=■r�M.■n..M.M1:��...■.....M.e■M■■■sC■.. ■oo■asasa uE ■ ■ ■loa HSs MIN■E■L':aan■..■■■M■.■aaa■. 'Iaa■M■SaaaC�a!■o.■.■M■...o■■Moms■■ as■a/■ana� ■ ■ :� .�a.■■n==a.sail■aa■agaaa■MMa■aaaan!/aa■anaa■■aaaa■■aaa! ME■somas MMMES saso■aoommis■a.■ ■M.■.M...■. ■.....a/■/.moms . .. : n. E..E.■n■ln.tt► ... .:C.... ......:............... u :■■:o■C■.■!.a■..,s.. I mommonsorn onesg■■soon no :n..aH..Na.n.aa■M■aa.■ a■■in am a a.o r/os ■ :s ■ .Man■.:aooM.aNSosaaaEa ■■ on me 0 a a C:swoom::aamsmsommmusso 11011:= ::::ME a = M:Ign■: ...._., ..... ■M■.Maa■as :os.:: • . E_■ us .au a I�=: an::MaM.■■■aMEoo■■■M■■ 'j= ■ , ■ ■ a�so: Baas:.% ss o:■::s::sso■::o■:s:::MEMO jl asN! mammon ■. ■ a_ ■ ■■..■ a.. ■ ■ _■'E�E ■oa■.o.li.■o'=■■.■No wasom OEM .■/.■■as■■sl:�laM.aa�■■.oMn■....M..n■ 'n: s : ■ ■ anon■■Ca%s MEN MHasa■Es saas�a .S■Sam Ma ■ /: sa ■ ■. a■a■oar/man■naa■oM■M■asnaaaMaanaa■a■ ■■M■■■■oso■s so man I.n. . .: H . .....n.. .r,............ ..■......... ■■■aaMss■■.o.00: aaas:a s a. as=a■ I'maaa � .. almingsNunn Sass:::a:sss:nNo me wall.on : Mii :M'::'Now a■C■C■ tr. ON q ■ `' so an �.E ■ as/::EEao.E.■asaa.a■SE■Es.aa■■�■oss■osso■!s ■si■■:aa. SEEN ■ ago* OFon MN some ME a■rlM.a/..■■■an�■HSa.aS .osommossommu=■/■■.moms an ■SaoIa wassesr sass: ' p �:�� ' s: ■ s :UNESENINNN E:sl:s:saso:'a::::\s soasno■mass: ■�' MENNEN 11�/a■ ::■ .: .: Ii�:::s:i::��:: ':s■■iir'.i:::ii�:i Ca::::..':: rIM■:■.M■M■ttltttu. ■ won a so 0 - SOME I:.s=:sass::::::s*n::III OMEN 11 : Na ! JIM, ::a:= : ;EONE annuli 0 Sol ■ BEENon ■: ■ ■ sisal 1► .;:: ■ ■■ 11:. ■ ■ ■ ■.\ ■ n.s mom.■ ■.� rim=� R .J x Jilin a a • Usisa sass ::: 3L:" JIM" * 11111 ::: ::11117 a Ir no no on ■ ■ 11■. ■ ■ ■ On ■ ■ ■- r = rill ■ ■ ■ a IIO : ■ ■.\ ■■ ::a. n : ■ will 111E;.:;■...�: ■.. ■■ :a■a;A '� Ill Iowans ■ ■o■ soli■ o. ■OnOno ■M��s.■.n.w I�.M , A .. ■rn.En.s " ■ : : ;. I�.so ■s■■s■llossr■Mssr NONE■ ■\■ ■.�r.■ al ■N■■■■r■■ ■\s; : ■ :NNE ruMN\■■ N■rs..■n■ ia\mr.- R ■ :sJ1n ■on■■s: ■ :s;.■■r::O 1■■■■■arnnrNME ■■. ■■ .r.'MN Eli Ma■■sso■■ \�. ..!!r�M;■N'1■■■.■O■N..ME■:s.NC..'1.r;._r�..:�r',ur;;.....■.■�■■ NON umon ; ■ E.■ .p■■11■MEs■MM.NMENE;\■M;momm• .. .�Il1 ■■r Isom son so ■ • �.. • moso SE iiim 1111ll■■■ snr..milommummom EENEM.■■■.■►4 ii ,. ■i!1111n■■...MN■■n■ s = ■ o� iii"iiiiiiiiiii-nommosi■ l:: NONMN■N■ ■.■MsrN�E�t►�u�■N:\JIII■rsENOE: ■ ■ ■ \.N■ ■■ . NONE ■ so \oEOsso\s■s r■�JM;■■■Nti\�` ■■\OWN N;; s.■. Sol a ; ; ■� G. ; :: N ■::�� : E:r: :s:-MM:mo"NN :::::.nom IN s o■ : ■ ■ : ■ c ■. .:..snrus::::•;Monty■ MONO SON \. ■ ■■ ■ Nty.■ ■ ■sNNs:a:r\\..■.. .: :■ ; ■ ;. qmmmml)ammr■;:N ;MEASURE O:: l:�. :::n:a:::M::::r: . a ■. lssM man :■\ ■ ■os■ar■■nn■NE■M ONE Nn�. s�ss:O..E■s■M■sNs.s.N:ssM. mossonsom mom onsommommom ommonsommem : :■� ■ ; r : ■■.■.:.:■i.r}�sl.:.:.:■::.:.N:■:■:■::■:suty■\a:■:.�r:..::sNi:N■:■:■::.■i■ :\r::.:.:.:..:iNi■:r:s:.:N.:: :■ Is s■ono �■■■.■■oss■os■ N os■:r so ■ • N O■■as :l ■ :Nors■sr ■■ IL ; : ONE n .nty■N ■ ■.■■ %am MENEM s■Na■aIllon ME so Our.:•:s ■sas s ■ :;MnsOtytyE..M■ME.Etn.rtys■.■M.E.sns.■ .■MN■M■n..■.M■.MrnnM■■Ety...O■N■n MN NN oty■orsNMI Er.■ ■ � ; IN■uMMNs■■\s.sENty■ ■Noo■.. H .o : n■ a ss■ni ■En.0rm a ■■No■Mons\■r.■N■N.■.NMN■■.■E.s■■■so■s\or■soE; � sN ■■■ rr::so .oNN■M■otyN MMO:s..M■sos■■o■.\■■NEN■uN■■rO■.rNO.ON■K■Ety■.■.N\■E■■■NNoMns■.NO■MNOu■■■N:■.r■MsM.NEO.r■NMN■■rNrN■Ety■E.N: : ::=: ss:li::s:s MONN. loll l :: :■ .r..tyr.ty■t:1■....■......■s.o..so:■noosOM ■ ar .■ ■■■ nr.:a:s l■■�\;■■■ ors■■■■■■n■v ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■;■;■■■■■■Ion ■ i :: ■:::::: ':■■: :;om annamommom :;sa ss:: .■ ■■ ■mom;■■ ■ ■ ■ ■so■;■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ in :: ::NM■:a:M: : : ::::s:O:a■N�■•;■■ ■om.oN■ s.M . . .I..... .... aO Isli "sass::'':= ■.;:.�� ■■MN.■■M:ommuroar;�. .Sam on . ■\son ■ . sM oonsr■■tys■mons .. ... MN soN■s......s. :■11:...............■MO ME■s :so N ■ s■nraM .■ENEM ■►r■nnn■N■■ sro\■tyO■ s.OMMM.On l ■ NM :.us■■ ss ■\■■son■uM:MMM.■ty■E::■Mn■■ ■ ■:■■: .o■r■aoE: ■on. ■on■■EON on moo' : .: mmumm■ ■N■■■EE.s■:;■owaM■nosso■so;EN.■N;Ea.1.; ■ ; ■ \now■union MORON N.MONES■ sM■ .■■■ntys■ MN ■\.■N No ■ NNN■■\MMMMM■oM■ENO■ osM■ ■M■\.■. .■nno ■■urn:.:■ Er ■ Nos: ::�::::::::\::iNty: ■::�N:ii::a::�■ommu emmommsu Na ■ ���. :sass D:s :sass:%: sMonslo: M:■on■Nos..■ ■NnM■:orNNs■:�:■ .O■Mn■.sn■s.NMMN.M■ussnmen ;am 0■■.■; .;moos M.os.N■lo;Otyu■■u■..■■■.......M....■■......■.\... ..;. ;... .■ moomms Mom . .so 4 no■No■sty/■■o\■Mmmummum wool■■.■.■..■mme ■ masons rM. ■■ ■ ■ _ ■ r:O :N�:N:N::moos a:::n::::a s::=aa:::::aa:ass::::a:0 isomass •_ •■ ■ ■. ; a�i:;. s.M.M:mom.;Nno■■■s■.■■s■.�r■Nr■..E...N...Nr.ss■..■n:MENNEN =r. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■owamosommusinoor\■soo.Mouros\■:: ■.■ s: .:.■.■ ■rr�; i■■■■\N■\■rrn■■■ .s.NNr.o■■.s;n■■■r■■.■Nrs\■■s■n ss:' ■ iNC:a�: :.' : sass::: sss:sani:i:sss:sa011111111111111108M■ ■s.ss.u■ ■tyO■Es■nr.En.00EM■ ro ■omm _.�..\...................... M EE ■■ ■:::::::r:N:::::::::::::E:::::::::M::..:sass:::: ::::u:a ■sE\■■� r ,._, r Esman\\.\■:.■s■\■n■■\■nE monsoons\ MEN a �� A S -B U I L T C O N D I T I O N � � WSP2 SUMMARY SHEET March. 1993 ESGR Connecting Channel Design �'AS-BUILT CONDITION TOTAL Q=1,240cfs X-SECT. W.S. MAIN SIDE Q-MAIN Q-SIDE VELOCITY VELOCITY COMMENTS ELEV. AREA AREA MAIN SIDE GRADd 7.5 322 --- 1240 --- 3.8 --- GRADu 7.4 321 --- 1240 --- 3.8 --- 67815 7.7 367 --- 1240 --- 3.4 --- 67755 7.7 378 --- 1240 --- 3.4 --- 67710 7.8 550 --- 1240 --- 2 .3 --- CONFLUENCE I405d 7.5 323 204 880 360 2.7 2 . 1 SPLIT FLOW I405 7.6 322 103 880 360 2 .7 3.5 SPLIT FLOW • I405u 7.6 323 131 880 360 2 .7 4. 1 SPLIT FLOW 67445 7.7 380 172 880 360 2 .4 2 .3 SPLIT FLOW 67375 7.9 527 --- 1240 --- 2 .5 --- 67275 7.8 374 --- 1240 --- 3.2 --- 67185 7.9 412 --- 1240 --- 3.0 --- SW16d 7.9 359 --- 1240 --- 3.8 --- SW16u 7.9 340 --- 1240 --- 3.8 --- COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev. 8-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE w� PROJECT� � /On��1/n 'lhQ n I l BY T DATE `�3 CHECKED BY DC-ATE / JOB NO.G/ t SUBJECT l LL �t5-b�►l+ h dr&AI SHEET OF t ' I ---� .-- r_ —�_.r_ cj ra 0 _ o l -!-- -4- - - -!— -- - I w � i o � I h�b�i te�t�"�x:?ff�•":•'• i'N„b_'a :.•' _:° ;•G'�•: 't. ,•.;: -+c '7.`..'£A•� b :hh t i' wtt� 1 :•, �{.. o-`.• T`Z _�"' �tN'��V���! U a I v I A z A � I o � o � 0 1� COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev. "9 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE PROJECTVJA F S/_ BY DAT'3E/93 CHECKED BYC% DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT ""'� l zi �� dr�c//L 3 SHEET-1- OF i -Are,o- z�3 ; �2 r l 5,1 I l o 604(01 -2 34' - �' ?to Z4o5. $_1 Z Z 2.n (05, z4- = -- Z '�9- --�--!L•S� �;3Zs_ t_--I ZZIto 2.� _ (p�-�6 3.3 Z -508 5 ZZS 3•l0 (oQ�.ro�j ' 4.0� - -- _ Z.�3 ' .'_�95.g_� Z9/v z&3 778. S 517 9 Z 4-53 --__. z:14 - _r �8. �o 338 -t5 10.5(0 479 Z.Sq s9 - 3taa Ib(oZ .D 8 (o • _744 9 o7,73X i i i O o Zov 4o0 Lis e(000 oo 6000 IZA30 Az. COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS—ENG-523 Rev. 8-69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE PROJECT BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. �1 SUBJECT SHEET OF Z' i d�termr�e Gr✓! e ,✓a/��lf /"auc rrte55 Gocf 15 S n = 75�MrE d= 5 D 17_ -f I- i f� z/3 71, 5 ....y kS�����I;;{bar -•.,�i�}"�; fi�r�`i�i:.,e�::•'-f�'' ��°'" �"K.�,k's,N,i�K�o�..s;ii.rt'.�°'Ss.';'rk:Jt'�"„�tt�'•i°�`*��.� _ � .���c�+t.4 �it fin r, ✓5 A tz2�3 Cu ry 7�Y d=9 8' S,✓t c e S, 7 > -5� 5` r n Y L cv�!IGLI 4= /caooups a fro.. �lsvz �r�t�Jl1oc.�f7 C u r t/�, rNn� yu Cyror.J �/ow �r'o file !.5 MZ . _- �q. ZZ3,ZZs i I WZIPZ Xtb' 1)4r t4/YJ VY:fl:7J ` REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: 1 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- WSP2 30. TITLE ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- 41,)ITITLE POND TO SW 16TH RUN $*CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** TITLE :::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: DISCHARGE -24.8 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.70968 DISCHARGE -24.8 1.0 STARTE 68076 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 STARTE 68076 7.5 OUTPUT S COMMENT $ $ BRIDGE AT SW 16TH $ $ $ $$ COMMENT ****SR405 AND GRADY BOXES AS OPEN CHANNELS**** REACH 68076 1240.0 0. 0. REACH GRADd 1240.0 50.0 50.0 REACH GRADu 1240.0 196.0 196.0 REACH 67815 1240.0 15.0 15.0 REACH 67755 1240.0 60.0 60.0 REACH 67710 1240.0 45.0 45.0 REACH I405d 1240.0 49.0 49.0 REACH I405 1240.0 85.0 85.0 REACH I405u 1240.0 85.0 85.0 REACH 67445 1240.0 45. 45. REACH 67375 1240.0 70. 70. REACH 67275 1240.0 100.0 100.0 REACH 67185 1240.0 90.0 90.0 REACH SW16d 1240.0 12. 12. REACH SW16u 1240.0 58.0 58.0 SECTION 68076 0.0 14.0 14.7 9.1 32.7 9.1 53.7 2.1 59.7 0.1 67.7 0.1 73.7 2.1 93.4 2.1 129.4 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 68076 1.0 C 14.7 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68076 2.0 C 32.7 NVALUE 0.034 SEGMENT 68076 3.0 C 53.7 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68076 4.0 C 73.7 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68076 5.0 C 93.4 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 68076 6.0 C 129.4 NVALUE 0.045 SECTION GRADd 0.0 13.090 0.0 2.05 11.00 2.05 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGP, ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS ___- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ::::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: 1 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 11.00 13.09 12.00 13.09 12.00 0.05 23.00 0.05 23.00 13.09 24.00 13.09 24.00 2.05 35.00 2.05 35.00 13.09 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.05 47.00 2.05 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.05 59.00 2.05 59.00 13.09 ENDTABLE SEGMENT GRADd 1.0 C 59.0 13.09 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION GRADu 11.vv 1J.V7 14.vV 1J.V7`, 14.VV V.V7 23.00 0.09 23.00 13.09 24.00 13.09 24.00 2.09 35.00 2.09 35.00 13.09 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.09 47.00 2.09 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.09 59.00 2.09 59.00 13.09 ENDTABLE SEGMENT GRADu 1.0 C 59.0 13.09 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION 67815 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.21 29. 2.21 35.4 .09 47.4 .09 53.8 2.21 60. 2.21 60.1 14. ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67815 1.0 C 0.1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT 67815 2.0 C 60. NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67815 3.0 C 60.1 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION 67755 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.59 29. 2.59 35. 0.1 47. .1 53. 2.59 60. 2.59 83. 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67755 1.0 C 1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT 67755 2.0 C 29. NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67755 3.0 C 53. NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67755 4.0 C 83. NVALUE 0.025 ,SECTION 67710 1 WSP2 XEA 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ::::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: 2 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.62 27. 2.62 35. 0.12 47. .12 56. 2.62 60.0 2.62 90.0 2.0 106.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67710 1.0 C .1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT 67710 2.0 C 27.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67710 3.0 C 56.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67710 4.0 C 106.0 NVALUE 0.025 SECTION I405d 0.0 13.09 0.0 2.12 11.00 2.12 11.00 13.09 12.00 13.09 12.00 0.12 23.00 0.12 23.00 13.09 24.00 13.09 24.00 2.12 35.00 2.12 35.00 13.09 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.12 47.00 2.12 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.12 59.00 2.12 59.00 13.09 ENDTABLE SEGMENT I405d 1.0 C 59.0 13.09 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION I405 0.0 13.09 0.0 2.16 11.00 2.16 11.00 13.09 12.00 13.09 12.00 0.16 L4.UV Z.10 J7.Vu L.10 SD.VV 11).ul) 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.16 47.00 2.16 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.16 59.00 2.16 59.00 13.09 ENDTABLE SEGMENT I405 1.0 C 59.0 13.09 NVALUE 0.012 4� SECTION I405u . 0.0 13.09 0.0 2.16 11.00 2.16 11.00 13.09 12.00 13.09 12.00 0.16 23.00 0.06 23.00 13.09 24.00 13.09 24.00 2.16 35.00 2.16 35.00 13.09 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.16 47.00 2.16 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.16 59.00 2.16 59.00 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT I405u 1.0 C 59.0 NVALUE 0.012 1 WSP2 XEA 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS �r PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ::::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: 3 -------------------------------LIST OF INPUT D4TA------------------------------ SECTION 67445 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.66 29. 2.66 35. .16 47. 0.16 53. 2.66 60. 2.66 75.0 7.9 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67445 1.0 C 0.1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT 67445 2.0 C 29. NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67445 3.0 C 53. -,;NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67445 4.0 C 75. NVALUE 0.025 SECTION 67375 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.68 29. 2.68 35. .18 47. 0.18 53. 2.68 60.0 2.68 66.0 2.0 83.0 2.0 109.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67375 1.0 C 0.1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT 67375 2.0 C 29. NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67375 3.0 C 53. NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67375 4.0 C 83. NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67375 5.0 C 109.0 NVALUE 0.040 SECTION 67275 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.69 16. 2.69 23. .19 35. 0.19 43. 2.69 60. 2.69 69.0 5.0 69.1 8.0 70. 8.0 70.1 11.0 71.0 11.0 71.1 14.0 i ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67275 1.0 C 0.1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT 67275 2.0 C 23.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67275 3.0 C 43.0 NVALUE 0.040 it YHLUC V.VLJ StGMENT 67275 5.0 C 69.0 1 WSP2 XEA 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ::::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: 4 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ ' NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67275 6.0 C 71.1 NVALUE 0.040 SECTION 67185 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.7 0.1 2.7 16. 2.7 23. .2 35. 0.2 43. 2.7 60. 2.7 72. 5.0 72.1 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67185 1.0 C 0.1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT 67185 2.0 C 72.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67185 3.0 C 72.1 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION SW16d 0.0 14.0 0.01 2.71 10.0 2.71 17.5 0.21 29.5 0.21 37.0 2.71 60.0 2.71 60.01 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SW16d 1.0 C 0.01 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT SW16d 2.0 C 10.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16d 3.0 C 37.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT SW16d 4.0 C 60.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16d 5.0 C 60.01 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION SW16u 0.0 14.0 0.01 2.72 10.0 2.72 17.5 0.22 29.5 0.22 37.0 2.72 60.0 2.72 60.01 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SW16u 1.0 C 0.01 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT SW16u 2.0 C 10.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16u 3.0 C 37.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT SW16u 4.0 C 60.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16u 5.0 C 60.01 NVALUE 0.012 1 WSP2 XEA 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ::::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: 5 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ • COMPUTE 68076 SW16u 68076 ------------------------------END OF DATA LISTING------------------------------ I COMPUTE 68076 SW16u 68076 ------------------------------STARTING DATA FROM GIVEN ELEVATION------------------------------ KtV 11/V1/YV `LKJLUN [.0 MHO 'UIHHMILL JLI.i.UM c==== HL1 0 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68076 DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOOOPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH �( DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.1 28.0 42.0 .00 .00 .00 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PP.OFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.5 330.7 496.0 .00 .00 .00 .40 3.1 .00014 72.2 2 7.5 330.7 620.0 .00 .00 .00 .50 3.3 .00021 72.2 3 7.5 330.7 744.0 .00 .00 .00 .60 3.6 .00030 72.2 4 7.5 330.7 868.0 .00 .00 .00 .70 3.8 .00041 72.2 5 7.5 330.7 880.0 .00 .00 .00 .71 3.8 .00043 72.2 6 7.5 330.7 1240.0 .00 .00 .00 1.00 4.4 .00085 72.2 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 68076 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 C C C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 496. 0. 0. 32. 206. 226. 32. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.76 .00 .00 .72 1.52 2.13 .72 2 DISCHARGE CFS 620. 0. 0. 40. 258. 283. 40. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.20 .00 .00 .90 1.89 2.66 .90 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744, 0. 0. 48. 309. 339. 48. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.64 .00 .00 1.08 2.27 3.19 1.08 4 DISCHARGE CFS 868. 0. 0. 56. 361. 396. 56. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.08 .00 .00 1.26 2.65 3.72 1.26 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880. 0. 0. 56. 366. 401. 57. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.12 .00 .00 1.28 2.69 3.77 1.28 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 0. 0. 79. 515. 565. 80. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.40 .00 .00 1.80 3.79 5.32 1.80 1 ELEV 7.5 KD 42637. 1. 1. 2700. 17760. 19451. 2724. 2 ELEV 7.5 KD 42637. 1. 1. 2700. 17760. 19451. 2724. 3 ELEV 7.5 KD 42637. 1. 1. 2700. 17760. 19451. 2724. 4 ELEV 7.5 KD 42637. 1. 1. 2700. 17760. 19451. 2724. 5 ELEV 7.5 KD 42637. 1. 1. 2700. 17760. 19451. 2724. 6 ELEV 7.5 KD 42637. 1. 1. 2700. 17760, 19451. 2724. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : _--_ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 :=_=> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <=::: ALT: -__- 7 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION GRADd DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT • 0 .1 0.0 0.0 1 7.5 322.5 496.0 .00 .06 .06 .40 3.0 .00004 55.0 2 7.5 322.9 620.0 .00 .06 .06 .50 3.2 .00006 55.0 3 7.5 323.4 744.0 .00 .06 .06 .60 3.4 .00009 55.0 4 7.5 324.0 868.0 .00 .06 .06 .70 3.6 .00012 55.0 5 7.5 324.0 880.0 .00 .06 .06 .71 3.6 .00012 55.0 6 7.6 326.2 1240.0 .00 .06 .06 1.00 4.2 .00023 55.0 atUritni 1HOLt rU,% atGuun U11Hu0 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 496. 496. 4 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.54 1.54 2 DISCHARGE CFS 620. 620. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.92 1.92 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744, 744. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.30 2.30 4 DISCHARGE CFS 868. 868. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.68 2.68 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880. 880. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.72 2.72 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 1240. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.80 3.80 1 ELEV 7.5 KO 79999. 79999, 2 ELEV 7.5 KD 80131. 80131. 3 ELEV 7.5 KD 80292. 80292. 4 ELEV 7.5 KD 30483, 80483. 5 ELEV 7.5 KD 80503. 80503. 6 ELEV 7.6 KD 81234. 81234. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 -:::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: _-_ 8 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION GRADu DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- N0. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 1 7.5 320.7 496.0 .00 .25 .25 .40 3.0 .00004 55.0 2 7.5 321.3 620.0 .00 .25 .25 .50 3.3 .00006 55.0 3 7.5 322.0 744.0 .00 .25 .25 .60 3.5 .00009 55.0 4 7.6 322.9 868.0 .00 .25 .25 .70 3.7 .00012 55.0 5 7.6 323.0 880.0 .00 .25 .25 .71 3.7 .00012 55.0 6 7.6 326.4 1240.0 .00 .25 .25 1,00 4.2 .00023 55.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION GRADu SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 496. 496, 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.55 1.55 2 DISCHARGE CFS 620. 620. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.93 1.93 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744. 744. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.31 2.31 4 DISCHARGE CFS 868. 868. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.69 2.69 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880. 880. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.73 2.72 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 1240. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.80 3.80 1 ELEV 7.5 KD 79411. 79411. J tLtV /.a nU i'iGbz. /yooL. 4 ELEV 7.6 KD 80154. 80154. 5 ELEV 7.6 KD 80185. 80185. 6 ELEV 7.6 KD 81296. 81296. *****WARNING - SECT. 67815 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 2 AT ELEVATION 2.41 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $ * *****WARNING - SECT. 67815 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 14.20 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $* # *****WARNING - SECT. 67815 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 3 AT ELEVATION 14.20 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ***** *****WARNING - SECT. 67815 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ***** *****WARNING - SECT. 67815 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 3 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ***** *****WARNING - SECT. 67815 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ***** *****WARNING - SECT. 67815 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 3 AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ***** 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ::::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: ____ 9 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67815 DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.2 39.0 54.1 .00 .01 .01 24.8 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.5 357.9 496.0 .00 .02 .02 .40 2.8 .00013 60.0 2 7.5 358.9 620.0 .00 .02 .02 .50 3.0 .00020 60.0 3 7.6 360.1 744.0 .00 .02 .02 .60 3.2 .00029 60.0 4 7.6 361.5 868.0 .00 .02 .02 .70 3.4 .00039 60.0 5 7.6 361.6 880.0 .00 .02 .02 .71 3.4 .00040 60.0 6 7.7 366.9 1240.0 .00 .02 .02 i.00 3.9 .00075 60.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67815 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 496, 0. 496. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.39 .00 1.39 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 620. 0. 620. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.73 .00 1.73 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744. 0. 744. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.07 .00 2.07 .00 4 DISCHARGE CFS 868. 0. 868. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.40 .00 2.40 .00 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880. 0. 880. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.44 .00 2.44 .00 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 0. 1240. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.38 .00 3.38 .00 i ELEV 7.5 KD 43427. 10. 43407. 10. 2 ELEV 7.5 KD 43630. 10. 43610. 10, 3 ELEV 7.6 KD 43877. 10. 43857. 10. 4 ELEV 7.6 KD 44169. 10. 44149, 10. 5 ELEV 7.6 KD 44200. 10. 44180. 10. 6 ELEV 7.7 KD 45278, 10. 45258. 10. .+**"HKnINb - J[L,I. 0`, JD NU VHLUtJ KCYLKJLU UN J[bPiuri i HI CLLYHllUi1 14.LV YHLVC UnmlluCV I LWVML rRLYlUUJ YnwL •* *****WARNING - SECT. 67755 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $ *****WARNING - SECT. 67755 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ***** 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : _--- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 =_:-> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <__== ALT: ____ i0 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67755 DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.6 44.8 60.8 .00 .03 .03 24.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.5 365.9 496.0 .00 .10 .10 .40 3.1 .00009 69.9 2 7.6 367.3 620.0 .00 i0 .10 .50 3.3 .00013 69.9 3 7.6 368.9 744.0 .00 .10 .10 .60 3.5 .00019 70.0 4 7.6 370.8 868.0 .00 .10 .10 .70 3.1 .00025 70.0 5 7.6 371.0 880.0 .00 .10 .10 .71 3.7 .00026 70.1 6 7.7 378.1 1240.0 .00 .10 .10 1.00 4.2 .00048 70.3 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67755 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 C C C C ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DISCHARGE CFS 496. 0. 228. 196. 72. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.40 .00 1.60 1.20 1.21 2 DISCHARGE CFS 620. 0. 285. 245. 90. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.74 .00 1.99 1.49 1.51 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744. 0. 342. 293. 108. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.09 .00 2.38 1.78 1.80 4 DISCHARGE CFS 868. 0. 400. 341. 127. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.42 .00 2.76 2.07 2.09 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880. 0. 405. 346, 129. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.45 .00 2.80 2.10 2.12 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 0. 573. 485, 183. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.39 .00 3.87 2.89 2.93 1 ELEV 7.5 KD 53602, 10. 24600. 21247. 7745. 2 ELEV 7.6 KD 53915. 10. 24756. 21346. 7803. 3 ELEV 7.6 KD 54296. 10. 24946. 21466. 7873. 4 ELEV 7.6 KD 54744. 10. 25171. 21607. 7957. 5 ELEV 7.6 KD 54791. 10. 25194. 21621. 7965. 6 ELEV 7.7 KD 56494. 11. 26047. 22154. 8283. *****WARNING - SECT. 67710 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 14.20 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ***** *****WARNING - SECT. 67710 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE #*#** *****WARNING - SECT. 67710 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT I AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ***** �1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ---_ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 :::=> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:_:: ALT: -_-- 11 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67710 DA: 1240,0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- 1 rl Ja rl Lr1 rLUUUeLHIN� IuIHL G)l9 tLLV )LUet Wiuld DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.6 60.8 57.5 .00 .06 .06 59.8 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.6 524.7 496.0 .00 .10 .10 .40 2.9 .00004 97.3 2 7.6 527.5 620.0 .00 .10 .10 .50 3.1 .00006 97.4 3 7.6 530.9 744.0 .00 .10 .10 .60 3.2 .00008 97.4 4 7.7 534.8 868.0 .00 .10 .10 .70 3.4 .00011 97.5 5 7.7 535.2 880.0 .00 .10 .10 .71 3.4 .00011 97.5 6 7.8 550.0 1240.0 .00 .10 .10 1.00 3.7 .00020 97.7 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67710 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 496. 0. 141. 155. 199. 0. VELOCITY FPS .97 .00 1.06 .80 1.01 2 DISCHARGE CFS 620. 0. 177. 194. 249. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.20 .00 1.32 .99 1.25 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744. 0. 212. 232. 300. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.44 .00 1.58 1.18 1.50 4 DISCHARGE CFS 868. 0. 248. 270. 350. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.66 .00 1.83 1.37 1.73 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880. 0. 251. 274. 355. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.68 .00 1.85 1.39 1.75 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 0. 356. 383. 501. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.31 .00 2.55 1.90 2.40 1 ELEV 7.6 KD 80316. 10. 22802. 25235, 32270. 2 ELEV 7.6 KD 81013. 10. 23021. 25414. 32567. 3 ELEV 7.6 KD 81860. 10. 23288. 25632. 32930. 4 ELEV 7.7 KD 82857. 10. 23602. 25888. 33356. 5 ELEV 7.7 KD 82961. 10. 23635. 25915. 33400. 6 ELEV 7.8 KD 86758. 11. 24836. 26885. 35026. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ::::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: _-_- 12 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION I405d DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 1 7.5 319.6 496.0 .00 .06 .06 .40 3.1 .00004 55.0 2 7.5 320.5 620.0 .00 .06 .06 .50 3.3 .00006 55.0 3 7.6 321.7 744.0 .00 .06 .06 .60 3.5 .00009 55.0 4 7.6 323.1 868.0 .00 .06 .06 .70 3.7 .00012 55.0 5 7.6 323.2 880.0 .00 .06 .06 .71 3.7 .00012 55.0 6 7.7 328.2 1240.0 .00 .06 .06 1.00 4.2 .00023 55.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION I405d SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ U. YLLUU1It rrJ 1,30 1.Do \ 2 DISCHARGE CFS 620, 620. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.94 1.93 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744. 744. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.31 2.31 4 DISCHARGE CFS 868. 868. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.69 2.69 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880. 880. ' 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.73 2.72 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 1240. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.78 3.78 1 ELEV 7.5 KD 79064. 79064. 2 ELEV 7.5 KD 79372. 79372. 3 ELEV 7.6 KD 79747. 79747. 4 ELEV 7.6 KD 80190. 80190. 5 ELEV 7.6 KD 80237. 80237, 6 ELEV 7.7 KD 81864. 81864. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ::::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: 13 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION I405 DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ..------------------------------ NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 1 7.5 318.1 496.0 .00 .11 .11 .40 3.1 .00004 55.0 2 7.6 319.1 620.0 .00 .11 .11 .50 3.3 .00006 55.0 • 3 7.6 320.4 744.0 .00 .11 .11 .60 3.5 .00009 55.0 4 7.6 321.9 868.0 .00 .11 .11 .70 3.7 .00012 55.0 5 7.6 322.1 880.0 .00 .11 .11 .71 3.7 .00012 55.0 6 7.7 327.5 1240.0 .00 .11 .11 1.00 4.3 .00023 55.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION I405 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 496. 496. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.56 1.56 2 DISCHARGE CFS 620. 620. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.94 1.94 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744. 744. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.32 2.32 4 DISCHARGE CFS 868. 868. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.70 2.70 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880. 880. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.74 2.73 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 1240. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.79 3.79 1 ELEV 7.5 KD 78563. 78563. 2 ELEV 7.6 KD 78901. 78901. 3 ELEV 7.6 KD 79313. 79313. 4 ELEV 7.6 KD 79799. 79799. 5 ELEV 7.6 KD 79850. 79850. 6 ELEV 7.7 KD 81634. 81634. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11J01/90 VERSION 2.0 __::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: 14 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION I405u DA: 1240.0 SA MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 1 7.5 318.3 496.0 .00 .11 .11 .40 3.1 .00004 55.0 2 7.6 319.4 620.0 .00 .11 .11 .50 3.3 .00006 55.0 3 7.6 320.8 744.0 .00 .11 .11 .60 3.5 .00009 55.0 4 7.6 322.5 868.0 .00 .11 .11 .70 3.7 .00012 55.0 5 7.6 322.6 880.0 .00 .11 .11 .71 3.7 .00012 55.0 6 7.7 328.6 1240.0 .00 .11 .11 1.00 4.3 .00023 55.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION I405u SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- 1 DISCHARGE CFS 496. 496. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.56 1.56 2 DISCHARGE CFS 620. 620. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.94 1.94 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744. 744. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.32 2.32 4 DISCHARGE CFS 868. 868. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.69 2.69 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880. 880. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.73 2.73 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 1240. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.78 3.77 1 ELEV 7.5 KD 78623. 78623. 2 ELEV 7.6 KD 78995. 78995, 3 ELEV 7.6 KD 79448. 79448. 4 ELEV 7.6 KD 79980. 79980, 5 ELEV 7.6 KD 80036. 80036. 6 ELEV 7.7 KD 81990. 81990. *****WARNING - SECT. 67445 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 15.40 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ***** *****WARNING - SECT. 67445 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 16.80 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ***** 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : --__ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ::::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: --__ 15 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67445 DA: 1240.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- N0. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.7 45.0 59.9 .00 .02 .02 24.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.5 372.3 496.0 .00 .08 .08 .40 3.2 .00008 73.9 2 7.6 374.4 620.0 .00 .08 .08 .50 3.4 .00013 74.0 3 7.6 376.8 744.0 .00 .08 .08 .60 3.6 .00018 74.1 4 1.6 379.7 868.0 .00 .08 .08 .70 3.8 .00024 74.2 5 7.7 380.0 880.0 .00 .08 .08 .71 3.8 .00025 74.2 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67445 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 C C C C ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 DISCHARGE CFS 496. 0. 223. 193. 80. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.38 .00 1.58 1.19 1.17 2 DISCHARGE CFS 620. 0. 278. 241. 101. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.71 .00 1.96 1.48 1.46 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744. 0. 334. 288. 121. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.04 .00 2.34 1.76 1.74 4 DISCHARGE CFS 868. 0. 391. 335. 142. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.36 .00 2.71 2.04 2.01 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880, 0. 396. 340, 144. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.39 .00 2.74 2.06 2.04 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 0. 560. 475. 206. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.28 .00 3.77 2.82 2.79 1 ELEV 7.5 KD 53902. 10. 24179. 21002. 8711, 2 ELEV 7.6 KD 54371. 10. 24405. 21144. 8811. 3 ELEV 7.6 KD 54943. 11. 2468i. 21317. 8934. 4 ELEV 7.6 KD 55617. 11. 25007. 21520. 9079. 5 ELEV 7.7 KD 55687. 11. 25041. 21541. 9094. 6 ELEV 7.8 KD 58190. 11. 26252. 22290. 9638. *****WARNING - SECT. 67375 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE *****WARNING - SECT. 67375 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $$$ # 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : -___ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ::::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: ___ 16 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67375 DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.0 29.8 29.7 .00 .03 .03 20.7 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.6 497.4 496.0 .00 .15 .15 .40 3.0 .00004 95.0 2 7.6 500.8 620.0 .00 .15 .15 .50 3.2 .00006 95.1 3 7.6 504.8 744.0 .00 .15 .15 .60 3.3 .00009 95.2 4 7.7 509.6 868.0 .00 .15 .15 .70 3.5 .00012 95.3 5 7.7 510.1 880.0 .00 .15 .15 .71 3.5 .00012 95.3 6 7.9 527.3 1240.0 .00 .15 .15 1.00 3.9 .00022 95.7 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67375 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 CC C C C------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 496. 0. 157. 136. 188. 15. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.06 .00 1.11 .84 1.18 .45 2 DISCHARGE CFS 620. 0. 196. 169. 235. 19. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.31 .00 1.38 1.04 1.46 .56 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744. 0. 236. 203. 283. 23. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.56 .00 1.64 1.23 1.74 .66 i. YLLUU111 tNJ l.al JO i.lu 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880. 0. 279. 239, 334. 28. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.83 ,00 1.93 1.44 2.04 .78 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 0, 396. 333. 471. 40. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.50 ,00 2.63 1.96 2.78 1.06 l 1 ELEV 7.6 KO 76415. 10. 24111. 20972. 29015. 2307. 2 ELEV 7.6 KD 77248. 10. 24400. 21156. 29335. 2346. 3 ELEV 7.6 KD 78259. 10. 24753. 21379. 29724. 2394. 4 ELEV 7.7 KD 79447. 10. 25167. 21639, 30180. 2451. 5 ELEV 7.7 KD 79571. 10. 25210. 21666. 30227. 2457, 6 ELEV 7.9 KD 83956. it. 26744. 22621, 31911. 2670. M O WARNING - SECT. 67275 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 2 AT ELEVATION 2.89 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $$#$ $****WARNING - SECT. 67275 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT i AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $$$ O M WARNING - SECT. 67275 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT I AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ##$$ 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : �__ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ::::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: _-_ i7 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67275 DA: 1240,0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRI1 FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL .2 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.6 374.2 496.0 ,00 .16 .16 40 3.2 .00007 69.4 2 7.6 376.5 620.0 .00 .16 .16 .50 3.4 ,00011 69.4 3 7.6 379.2 744.0 .00 .16 .16 .60 3.6 .00016 69.4 4 7.7 382.4 868.0 .00 .16 .16 .70 3.7 .00021 69.5 5 7.7 382.8 880.0 ,00 .16 .16 .71 3.8 .00021 69.3 6 7,9 394.3 1240.0 .00 .16 .16 1.00 4.2 .00038 69,6 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67275 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 C C C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 496. 0. 181. 155. 120. 40. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.36 .00 1.51 1.12 1.45 1.19 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 620. 0. 227. 193. 150. 50. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.70 ,00 1,87 1.40 1.81 1.48 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744, 0. 272. 231. 181. 60. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.02 .00 2.23 1.66 2.15 1.77 .00 4 DISCHARGE CFS 868. 0. 318, 268. 211. 71. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.34 .00 2.58 1.92 2.49 2.05 ,00 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880. 0. 322. 272. 214. 72, O: 1. VELOCITY FPS 2,37 .00 2.62 1.94 2.52 2.08 .00 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 0. 454. 379. 303. 103, 0, 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.24 .00 3.58 2.65 3.46 2.87 ,00 1 ELEV 7.6 KD 58286. 11. 21302, 18222. 14108. 4638. 4. 2 ELEV 7.6 KD 58883. 11, 21525. 18368, 14267, 4706. 4. 3 ELEV 7.6 KD 59608. 11. 21796. 18546. 14461. 4789. 4. 4 ELEV 7.7 KD 60457. 11. 22113. 18753. 14687. 4887. 4. 5 ELEV 7.7 KD 60545. it. 22147. 18774. 14711. 4898. 4. 6 ELEV 7.9 KD 63666. 12. 23312. 19529. 15546. 5263, 5. *+"HKII11YU JCU I. 0110J NU YMLVCJ ILY CIIJLU Ull JLOIt Cif: L ni uLLvni_un L.-V rn­ $****WARNING - SECT. 67185 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $* *****WARNING - SECT. 67185 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 3 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $ *****WARNING - SECT. 11111 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 11.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE jjjo,� WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ==_=> MAIN CHANNEL SEC'fION <::=: ALT: ____ 18 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67185 DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.7 48.8 62.7 .00 .06 .OS 27.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.6 385.6 496.0 .00 .15 .15 .40 3.2 .00013 72.0 2 7.6 3G8.5 620.0 .00 .15 .15 .50 3.4 .00020 72.0 3 7.7 392.1 744.0 .00 .15 .15 .60 3.6 .00028 72.0 4 7.7 396.2 868.0 .00 .15 .15 .70 3.7 .00037 72.0 5 7.7 396.6 880.0 .00 .15 .15 .71 3.8 .00037 72.0 6 7.9 411.2 1240.0 .00 .15 .15 1.00 4.2 .00066 72.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67185 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 496. 0. 496. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.29 .00 1.29 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 620. 0. 620. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.60 .00 1.60 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744. 0. 744. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.90 .00 1.90 .00 4 DISCHARGE CFS 868. 0. 868. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.20 .00 2.19 .00 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880. 0. 880, 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.23 .00 2.22 .00 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 0. 1240. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.02 .00 3.02 .00 1 ELEV 7.6 KD 43396. 10. 43382. 5. 2 ELEV 7.6 KD 43954. 10. 43940. 5. 3 ELEV 7.7 KD 44629. 10, 44614. 5. 4 ELEV 7.7 KD 45416. 10. 45402. 5. 5 ELEV 7.7 KD 45498. 10. 45484. 5. 6 ELEV 7.9 KD 48374. 10. 48359. 5. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ::::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: ____ 19 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SW16d DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT bHNN LULL Z./ 4b.b� 11.1 VV V1 .U1 cr.v �*$**MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.6 339.9 496.0 .00 .02 .02 .40 3.2 .00012 60.0 2 7.6 341.9 620.0 .00 .02 .02 .50 3.4 .00018 60.0 3 7.6 344.4 744.0 .00 .02 .02 .60 3.6 .00025 60.0 4 7.7 347.3 868.0 .00 .02 .02 .70 3.8 .00033 60.0 5 7.7 347.6 880.0 .00 .02 .02 .71 3.8 .00034 60.0 6 7.9 357.7 1240.0 .00 .02 .02 1.00 4.3 .00061 60.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SW16d SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 C C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 496. 0. 90. 200. 206. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.60 .00 1.85 1.11 1.85 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 620. 0. 112. 250. 258. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.98 .00 2.29 1.38 2.29 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744. 0. 135. 299. 310. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.36 .00 2.73 1.65 2.73 .00 4 DISCHARGE CFS 868. 0. 157, 348. 362. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.74 .00 3.17 1.90 3.17 .00 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880. 0. 160. 353. 367. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.77 .00 3.21 1.93 3.21 .00 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 0. 226. 493. 520. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.80 .00 4.39 2.63 4.39 .00 1 ELEV 7.6 KD 45773. 11. 8239. 18543. 18969. 11. 2 ELEV 7.6 KD 46254. 11. 8336. 18702, 19193. 11. 3 ELEV 7.6 KD 46836. 12. 8454. 18895. 19464. 12. 4 ELEV 7.7 KD 47514. 12. 8592. 19118. 19780. 12. 5 ELEV 7.7 KD 47584. 12. 8606. 19142. 19813, 12. 6 ELEV 7.9 KD 50044. 12. 9107. 19948. 20966. 12. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ::::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: -___ 20 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SW16u DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: 00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOOOPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.7 48.8 71.2 .00 .04 .04 27.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.6 339.7 496.0 .00 .08 .08 .40 3.2 .00012 60.0 2 7.6 342.0 620.0 .00 .08 .08 .50 3.4 .00018 60.0 3 7.7 344.7 744.0 .00 .08 .08 .60 3.6 .00025 60.0 4 7.7 347.8 868.0 .00 .08 .08 .70 3.8 .00033 60.0 5 7.7 348.1 880.0 .00 .08 .08 .71 3.8 .00034 60.0 6 7.9 359.2 1240.0 .00 .08 .08 1.00 4.3 .00060 60.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SW16u SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 C C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 496. 0. 90. 200. 206. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.60 .00 1.85 1.12 1.85 .00 I. VtLUG111 rP) I.9tl .00 2.29 t ;8 2.29 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 744. 0. 135, 299. 310. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2,36 .00 2.73 1.65 2.73 .00 4 DISCHARGE CFS 868. 0. 157. 348. 362. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.73 .00 3.16 1.90 3.16 .00 5 DISCHARGE CFS 880. 0. 160. 353. 367. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.77 .00 3.20 1.92 3.20 .00 1}9 6 DISCHARGE CFS 1240. 0. 226. 493. 521. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.78 .00 4.38 2.61 4.38 .00 1 ELEV 7.6 KD 45727. 11. 8230. 18527. 18947. 11. 2 ELEV 7.6 KD 46258. 11. 8337. 18704. 19195. 11. 3 ELEV 7.7 KD 46899. 12. 8467. 18915. 19493. 12. 4 ELEV 7.7 KD 47643. 12. 8618. 19161. 19841. 12. 5 ELEV 7.7 KD 47721. 12. 8634. 19187. 19877. 12. 6 ELEV 7.9 KD 50413, 12. 9182. 20068. 21140. 12. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS _ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ::::> MAIN CHANNEL SECTION <:::: ALT: 21 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- TITLE P-1 CHANNEL PROFILE - PUMP PLANT TO 16TH AVE. ENDJOB .tt*********:$*****$***********NORMAL END OF JOB------------------------------ 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/14/93 09:19:55 WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: 1 ---------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- ENDRUN SCS WSP2 VERSION 11/01/90 FILE SUMMARY INPUT : AB-MAIN.DAT OUTPUT : AB-MAIN.RUN DATED 04/14/93 09:19:55 • WSP 'E" 03/25/93 12:17:58 GN : An YF'-laK. L,;�H"1 WS ; PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: i ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- WSP2 30. f` TITLE ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- �TITLE POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** DISCHARGE -24.8 1.00 STARTE 72963 5.0 OUTPUT COMMENT ************ BRIDGE AT 7TH ST. *************** COMMENT ************ BRIDGE AT OAKSDALE ************** COMMENT -----DISCHARGES FROM 1980 ESGR HYDROLOGY------ REACH72963 1288.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 REACH 72890 1288.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 REACH 72700 1288.0 190.0 190.0 190.0 190.0 REACH 72515 1288.0 185.0 185.0 185.0 185.0 REACH 72300 1288.0 215.0 215.0 215.0 215.0 REACH 72230 1288.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 REACH 72150 1288.0 165.0 80.0 165.0 165.0 REACH 72000 1288.0 153.0 150.0 153.0 153.0 REACH 71850 1288.0 142.0 150.0 142.0 142.0 REACH 71750 1288.0 92.0 92.0 92.0 92.0 REACH 71643 1288.0 103.0 107.0 103.0 103.0 REACH 71500 1288.0 140.0 143.0 140.0 140.0 REACH 71385 1288.0 60.0 115.0 60.0 60.0 REACH 71250 1288.0 75.0 135.0 75.0 75.0 REACH 71150 1288.0 37.0 100.0 37.0 37.0 REACH 71050 1288.0 35.0 100.0 35.0 35.0 REACH 70900 1288.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 REACH 70800 1288.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 EACH 70735 1288.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 REACH 70655 1288.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 REACH 70440 1260.0 215.0 215.0 215.0 215.0 REACH 70406 1260.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 ROAD OAKSDL 2.7 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 REACH 70375 1260.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 REACH 70076 1260.0 269.0 269.0 269.0 269.0 REACH 69746 1260.0 330.0 330.0 330.0 330.0 ROAD SEVEN 2.7 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 REACH 69686 1260.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 REACH 69495 1260.0 1191.0 1191.0 1191.0 1191.0 REACH 68368 1260.0 1127.0 1127.0 1127.0 1127.0 REACH 68325 1260.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 REACH 68247 1260.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 REACH 68148 1260.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 REACH 68115 1260.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 REACH 68076 1260.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 SECTION 72963 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 1 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 0.0 14.0 0.0 -8.0 165.0 -8.0 165.0 14.0 NDTABLE SEGMENT 72963 1.0 C 165.0 14.0 NVALUE 0.035 SECTION 72890 0.0 14.0 28.0 0.0 44.0 -8.0 209.0 -8.0 225.0 0.0 235.0 14.0 ENDTABLE 9FGMFNT 72R90 1.0 N 28-0 - - ,SEGMENT, 72890 2.0 C 225�.D NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 72890 3.0 N 235.0 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 72700 0.0 14.0 42.0 0.0 52.8 -3.6 217.8 -3.6 228.6 0.0 270.6 14.0 �LLYENDTABLE SEGMENT 72700 1.0 N 42.0 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72700 2.0 C 228.6 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 72700 3.0 N 270.6 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 72515 0.0 14.0 7.5 11.5 27.5 11.5 56.0 2.0 64.4 -0.8 229.4 -0.8 237.8 2.0 273.8 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 72515 1.0 D 7.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72515 2.0 D 27.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 72515 3.0 N 56.0 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72515 4.0 C 237.8 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 72515 5.0 N 273.8 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 72300 0.0 14.0 17.4 8.2 37.4 8.2 56.0 2.0 64.4 -0.8 72.4 -0.8 78.4 2.0 238.4 2.0 274.4 14.0 _ ENDTABLE 1 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY $CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$* ALT: 2 ------------------------------LIST Of INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT 72300 1.0 D 17.4 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72300 2.0 D 37.4 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 72300 3.0 N 56.0 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72300 4.0 C 78.4 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 72300 5.0 N 238.4 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72300 6.0 N 274.4 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 72230 0.0 14.0 17.4 8.2 37.4 8.2 56.0 2.0 64.4 -0.8 72.4 -0.8 78.4 2.0 292.0 2.0 326.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 72230 1.0 D 17.4 i !VALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72230 2.0 D 37.4 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 72230 3.0 N 56.0 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72230 4.0 C 78.4 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 72230 5.0 N 292.0 .SEGMENT , 72230 6.0 N 326.0 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 72150 0.0 14.0 17.1 8.3 37.1 8.3 58.1 1.3 64.1 -0.7 72.1 -0.7 78.1 1.3 419.0 1.3 448.6 14.0 ENDTABLE 'SEGMENT 72150 1.0 D 17.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72150 2.0 D 37.1 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 72150 3.0 N 58.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72150 4.0 C 78.1 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 72150 5.0 N 419.0 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72150 6.0 N 448.6 1 WSP2 %EG 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY 000NNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN* ALT: 3 -------------------------------LIST Of INPUT DATA------------------------------ NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 72000 0.0 14.0 17.1 8.3 37.1 8.3 58.1 1.3 64.1 -0.7 72.1 -0.7 78.1 1.3 448.1 1.3 475.1 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 72000 1.0 D 17.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72000 2.0 D 37.1 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 72000 3.0 N 58.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72000 4.0 C 78.1 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 72000 5.0 N 448.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72000 6.0 N 475.1 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71850 0.0 14.0 17.1 8.3 37.1 8.3 58.1 1.3 64.1 -0.7 72.1 -0.7 78.1 1.3 358.1 1.3 406.1 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 71850 1.0 D 17.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71850 2.0 D 37.1 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 71850 3.0 N 58.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71850 4.0 C 78.1 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 71850 5.0 N 358.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71850 6.0 N 406.1 IVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71750 0.0 14.0 17.1 8.3 37.1 8.3 58.1 1.3 64.1 -0.7 72.1 -0.7 78.1 1.3 256.2 1.3 308.2 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 71750 1.0 D 17.1 NV41 OF olno ,NVALUE , 0.050 SEGMENT 71750 3.0 N 58.1 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 4 ( ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ &.NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71750 4.0 C 78.1 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 71750 5.0 N 256.2 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71750 6.0 N 308.2 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71643 0.0 14.0 16.8 8.4 36.8 8.4 57.8 1.4 63.8 -0.6 71.8 -0.6 77.8 1.4 210.8 1.4 250.8 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 71643 1.0 D 16.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71643 2.0 D 36.8 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 71643 3.0 N 57.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71643 4.0 C 77.8 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 71643 5.0 N 210.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71643 6.0 N 250.8 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71500 0.0 14.0 16.8 8.4 36.8 8.4 57.8 1.4 63.8 -0.6 71.8 -0.6 77.8 1.4 263.8 1.4 293.8 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 71500 1.0 D 16.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71500 2.0 D 36.8 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 71500 3.0 N 57.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71500 4.0 C 77.8 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 71500 5.0 N 263.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71500 6.0 N 293.8 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71385 0.0 14.0 16.8 8.4 36.8 8.4 57.8 1.4 63.8 -0.6 71.8 -0.6 77.8 1.4 397.8 1.4 429.8 14.0 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 5 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 7NDTABLE SEGMENT 71385 1.0 D 16.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71385 2.0 D 36.8 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 71385 3.0 N 57.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71385 4.0 C 77.8 ,SEGMENT. 71385 5.0 N 391.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71385 6.0 N 429.8 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71250 0.0 14.0 16.8 8.4 36.8 8.4 f' 57.8 1.4 63.8 -0.6 71.8 -0.6 �ENDTABLE 77.8 1.4 457.8 1.4 489.8 14.0 SEGMENT 71250 1.0 D 16.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71250 2.0 D 36.8 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 71250 3.0 N 57.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71250 4.0 C 77.8 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 71250 5.0 N 457.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71250 6.0 N 489.8 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71150 0.0 14.0 16.5 8.5 36.5 8.5 57.5 1.5 63.5 -0.5 71.5 -0.5 77.5 1.5 455.5 1.5 487.5 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 71150 1.0 D 16.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71150 2.0 D 36.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 71150 3.0 N 57.5 NVALUE 0.100 1EGMENT 71150 4.0 C 77.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 71150 - 5.0 N 455.5 NVALUE 0.100 1 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 6 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT 71150 6.0 N 487.5 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71050 0.0 14.0 16.5 8.5 36.5 8.5 57.5 1.5 63.5 -0.5 71.5 -0.5 77.5 1.5 352.5 1.5 384.5 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 71050 1.0 D 16.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71050 2.0 D 36.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 71050 3.0 N 57.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71050 4.0 C 77.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 71050 5.0 N 352.5 (VALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71050 6.0 N 384.5 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 70900 0.0 14.0 16.5 8.5 36.5 8.5 57.5 1.5 63.5 -0.5 71.5 -0.5 77.5 1.5 249.5 1.5 280.5 14.0 ENOTARLF ,NVALUE , 0.100 SEGMENT 70900 2.0 D 36.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70900 3.0 N 57.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 70900 4.0 C 77.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70900 5.0 N 249.5 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 70900 6.0 N 280.5 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 70800 0.0 14.0 16.5 8.5 36.5 8.5 57.5 1.5 63.5 -0.5 71.5 -0.3 77.5 1.5 184.5 1.5 216.5 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70800 1.0 D 16.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 70800 2.0 D 36.5 NVALUE 0.050 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNEC,TING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 7 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT 70800 3.0 N 57.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 70800 4.0 C 77.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70800 5.0 N 184.5 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 70800 6.0 N 216.5 !VALUE 0.100 SECTION 70735 0.0 14.0 16.2 8.6 34.5 8.5 55.5 1.6 61.5 -0.4 69.5 -0.4 75.5 1.6 115.5 1.6 152.7 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70735 1.0 D 16.2 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 70735 2.0 D 34.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70735 3.0 N 55.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 70735 4.0 C 75.5 NVALUE 0.030 SEGMENT 70735 5.0 N 115.5 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 70735 6.0 N 152.7 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION 70655 0.0 14.0 16.2 8.6 34.5 8.5 55.5 1.6 61.5 -0.4 69.5 -0.4 75.5 1.6 115.5 1.6 152.7 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70655 1.0 D 16.2 NVALUE 0.045 !EGMENT 70655 2.0 D 34.5 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 70655 3.0 N 55.5 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 70655 4.0 C 75.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70655 5.0 N 115.5 NVALUE 0.025 . NVALUE . 0.045 SECTION 70440 0.0 14.0 16.2 8.6 34.5 8.6 55.5 1.6 61.5 -0.4 69.5 -0.4 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 8 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 75.5 1.6 115.5 1.6 152.7 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70440 1.0 D 16.2 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 70440 2.0 0 34.5 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 70440 3.0 N 55.5 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 70440 4.0 C 75.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70440 5.0 N 115.5 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 70440 6.0 N 152.7 NVALUE 0.045 SECTION 70406 0.0 14.0 16.5 8.6 34.5 8.5 55.5 1.6 61.5 -0.4 69.5 -0.4 75.5 1.6 115.5 1.6 152.7 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70406 1.0 D 16.5 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 70406 2.0 D 34.5 ,0,NVALUE 0.035 EGMENT 70406 3.0 N 55.5 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 70406 4.0 C 75.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70406 5.0 N 115.5 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 70406 6.0 N 152.7 NVALUE 0.045 SECTION OAKSDL -10.0 19.00 0.00 19.00 18.0 8.6 36.0 8.6 54.0 -0.54 62.0 -0.54 68.0 1.8 118.0 1.8 158.0 19.0 168.0 19.1 ENDTABLE BPR OAKSDL 8 1. 7. PIER 1.6 3.5 4.6 3.5 GIRDER 19.5 19.0 0.0 0.8 2.7 0.0 19.0 0.0 16.5 158.0 16.5 158.0 19.0 ENDTABLE SECTION 70375 0.0 14.0 16.2 8.6 34.5 8.6 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY $*CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 9 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 55.5 1.6 61.5 -0.4 69.5 -0.4 75.5 1.6 115.5 1.6 152.7 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70375 1.0 D 16.2 NVALUE 0.045 gFr,MFNT 70175 ? 0 n zd 5 SEGMENT. 70375 C N 55.5 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 70375 4.0 C 75.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70375 5.0 N 115.5 NVALUE 0.025 �.: EGMENT 70375 6.0 N 152.7 NVALUE 0.045 SECTION 70076 0.0 14.0 15.9 8.7 33.9 8.7 54.9 1.7 60.9 -0.3 68.9 -0.3 74.9 1.7 114.9 1.7 151.8 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70076 1.0 D 15.9 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 70076 2.0 D 33.9 NVALUE 0.034 SEGMENT 70076 3.0 N 54.9 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 70076 4.0 C 74.9 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70076 5.0 N 114.9 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 70076 6.0 N 151.8 NVALUE 0.045 SECTION 69746 0.0 14.0 15.9 8.7 33.9 8.7 54.9 1.7 60.9 -0.3 68.9 -0.3 74.9 1.7 114.9 1.7 151.8 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 69746 1.0 D 15.9 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 69746 2.0 D 33.9 NVALUE 0.034 SEGMENT 69746 3.0 N 54.9 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 69746 4.0 C 74.9 NVALUE 0.040 1 WSP2 XEO 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY $$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 10 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT 69746 5.0 N 114.9 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 69746 6.0 N 151.8 NVALUE 0.045 SECTION SEVEN -1.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 13.0 8.7 25.0 8.7 33.0 6.0 52.0 -0.3 60.0 -0.3 66.0 1.74 106.0 1.74 125.0 8.0 133.0 19.0 135.0 20.0 ENDTABLE BPR SEVEN 8 1.0 3.0 PIER 3.76 1.50 1.76 1.50 GIRDER 18.0 16.50 0.0 0.80 2.7 0.0 20.0 0.0 17.0 133.0 16.0 133.0 19.0 ENDTABLE SECTION 69686 0.0 14.0 15.9 8.8 33.9 8.8 42.9 5.8 60.9 -0.2 68.9 -0.2 74.9 1.8 114.9 1.8 150.8 14.0 ENDTABLE SFPMFNT 69686 1.0 0 15.9 SEGMENT• 69686 2.0 D 33.9 NVALUE 0.034 SEGMENT 69686 3.0 N 42.9 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 69686 4.0 C 74.9 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 69686 5.0 N 114.9 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 69686 6.0 N 150.8 NVALUE 0.045 SECTION 69495 0.0 14.0 15.3 8.9 33.3 8.9 42.3 1.9 63.3 -0.1 71.3 -0.1 77.3 1.9 117.3 1.9 153.6 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 69495 1.0 D 15.3 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 69495 2.0 D 33.3 NVALUE 0.034 SEGMENT 69495 3.0 N 42.3 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 69495 4.0 C 77.3 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS _W PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY $$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN#$ ALT: 11 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 69495 5.0 N 117.3 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 69495 6.0 N 153.6 NVALUE 0.045 ECTION 68368 0.0 14.0 15.0 9.0 33.0 9.0 54.0 2.0 60.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 74.0 2.0 114.0 2.0 150.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 68368 1.0 D 15.0 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68368 2.0 D 33.0 NVALUE 0.034 SEGMENT 68368 3.0 N 54.0 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68368 4.0 C 74.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68368 5.0 N 114.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 68368 6.0 N 150.0 NVALUE 0.045 SECTION 68325 0.0 14.0 15.0 9.0 33.0 9.0 54.0 2.0 60.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 74.0 2.0 114.0 2.0 150.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 68325 1.0 D 15.0 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68325 2.0 D 33.0 !VALUE 0.034 SEGMENT 68325 3.0 N 54.0 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68325 4.0 C 74.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68325 5.0 N 114.0 NVALUE 0.025 gPPMPNT /RTIS n N ISn n SECTION 68247 0.0 14.0 15.0 9.0 33.0 9.0 54.0 2.0 60.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 74.0 2.0 114.0 2.0 150.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 68247 1.0 D 15.0 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE 'y REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGNO ALT: 12 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68247 2.0 D 33.0 NVALUE 0.034 SEGMENT 68247 3.0 N 54.0 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68247 4.0 C 74.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68247 5.0 N 114.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 68247 6.0 N 150.0 NVALUE 0.045 SECTION 68148 0.0 14.0 14.7 9.1 32.7 9.1 53.7 2.1 59.7 0.1 67.7 0.1 73.7 2.1 113.7 2.1 149.4 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 68148 1.0 D 14.7 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68148 2.0 D 32.7 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 68148 3.0 N 53.7 (VALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68148 4.0 C 73.7 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68148 . 5.0 N 113.7 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 68148 6.0 N 149.4 NVALUE 0.045 SECTION 68115 0.0 14.0 14.7 9.1 32.7 9.1 53.7 2.1 59.7 0.1 67.7 0.1 73.7 2.1 103.7 2.1 139.4 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 68115 1.0 D 14.7 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68115 2.0 D 32.7 NVALUE 0.034 SEGMENT 68115 3.0 N 53.7 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68115 4.0 C 73.7 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68115 5.0 N 103.7 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 68115 6.0 N 139.4 NVALUE 0.045 1 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$ ALT: 13 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SECTION 68076 0.0 14.0 14.7 9.1 32.7 9.1 53.7 2.1 59.7 0.1 67.7 0.1 73.7 2.1 93.4 2.1 129.4 14.0 SEGMENT. 68076 1.0 D 14.7 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68076 2.0 D 32.7 NVALUE 0.034 SEGMENT 68076 3.0 N 53.7 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 68076 4.0 C 73.7 WVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68076 5.0 N 93.4 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 68076 6.0 N 129.4 NVALUE 0.045 COMPUTE 72963 68076 72963 ------------------------------END OF DATA LISTING------------------------------ 1 COMPUTE 72963 68076 72963 ------------------------------STARTING DATA FROM GIVEN ELEVATION------------------------------ 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 14 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72963 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -8.0 0.0 0.0 1 5.0 2145.0 1288.0 .00 .00 .00 1.00 -6.8 .00001 165.0 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 15 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72890 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT ****$ MESSAGE REACH 72890 HAS A DAMAGE LENGTH BUT NO DAMAGE SEGMENT CHECK INPUT DATA ***** 0 -8.0 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .0 1448.0 755.8 .00 .33 .33 197.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL .0 1448.0 755.8 .00 .33 .33 197.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 5.0 2467.6 1288.0 .00 .33 .35 1.00 -6.8 .00001 210.6 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 16 • RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72700 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ---------------------------- -- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -3.6 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .0 632.9 496.6 .00 .81 .81 186.6 . *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL .0 632.9 496.6 .00 .81 .81 186.6 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 5.0 1641.6 1288.0 .00 .81 .94 1.00 -2.4 .00002 216.6 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : PAGE 1 REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 17 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72515 DA: 1288.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- 140. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CS" ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.8 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.0 485.5 590.6 .00 .77 .77 181.8 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 2.0 48.5.5 590.6 .00 .77 .77 181.8 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 5.0 1058.8 1288.0 .00 .77 .85 1.00 .4 .00009 199.8 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 18 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72300 DA: 1268.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.8 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.0 42.6 81.4 .00 .11 .11 22.4 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 2.0 42.6 81.4 .00 .11 .11 22.4 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 5.3 673.5 1288.0 .00 .11 1.00 1.00 2.9 .00180 202.1 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : _M PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 19 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72230 DA: 1288.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.8 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.0 42.6 61.9 .00 .04 .04 22.4 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 2.0 42.6 61.9 .00 .04 .04 22.4 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 5.4 885.6 1288.0 .00 .04 .41 1.00 2.8 .00112 256.0 ***** MESSAGE DAMAGE LENGTH GREATER THAN FLOODPLAIN LENGTH FOR REACH 72150 ***** 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 20 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.7 0.0 0.0 3 LOW GRND 1.3 28.0 22.5 .00 .08 .08 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.3 28.0 22.5 .00 .08 .08 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 5.5 1602.5 1288.0 .00 .08 .70 1.00 1.9 .00018 383.4 ## MESSAGE DAMAGE LENGTH GREATER THAN FLOODPLAIN LENGTH FOR REACH 72000 # $ $ 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 21 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72000 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.7 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.3 28.0 20.7 .00 .07 .07 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.3 28.0 20.7 .00 .07 .07 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 5.6 1740.7 1288.0 .00 .07 1.42 1.00 1.9 .00028 411.9 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : _M PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: �r 22 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71850 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.7 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.3 28.0 26.0 .00 .07 .07 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.3 28.0 . 26.0 .00 .07 .07 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 5.6 1388.7 1288.0 .00 .07 1.13 1.00 2.0 .00044 329.3 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: -__ 23 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71750 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP �. FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.7 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.3 28.0 37.6 .00 .04 .04 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.3 28.0 37.6 .00 .04 .04 20.0 *****MFSSA6F- FI FV RFI nW FTRST PRf1FTI F Flu TNTFPP01 ATFD I TNFAPI Y FPf1M f HANNFI RnTTnM***** WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 24 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71643 DA: 1288.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.6 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.4 28.0 48.0 .00 .05 .05 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.4 28.0 48.0 .00 .05 .05 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 1 5.7 750.9 1288.0 .00 .05 .44 1.00 2.5 .00120 179.8 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : _- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 25 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71500 DA: 1288.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.6 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.4 28.0 35.8 .00 .06 .07 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.4 28.0 35.8 .00 .06 .07 20.0 ****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 5.9 1008.4 1288.0 .00 .06 .76 1.00 2.3 .00070 230.2 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ,- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 26 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71385 DA: 1288.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.6 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.4 28.0 22.1 .00 .03 .05 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.4 28.0 22.1 .00 .03 .05 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 5.9 1631.9 1288.0 .00 .03 .96 1.00 2.1 .00049 365.2 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : _,_ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 27 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71250 DA: 1288.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.6 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.4 28.0 18.8 .00 .03 .06 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFTIF. FLOW TNTFRPOIATFn ITNFARIY FanM rNANNFI RnTTgM***** *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST' ?On"ILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 6,0 1920.8 1288.0 .00 .03 1.32 1.00 2.0 .00035 425.4 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ___ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: �__ 28 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71150- DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------ NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.5 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.5 28.0 19.3 .00 .02 .05 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.5 28.0 19.3 .00 .02 .05 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 6.0 1873.0 1288.0 .00 .02 .97 1.00 2.1 .00052 423.0 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ___ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 29 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71050 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.5 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.5 28.0 25.6 .00 .02 .05 20.0 ****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.5 28.0 25.6 .00 .02 .05 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 6.0 1409.4 1288.0 .00 .02 .73 1.00 2.2 .00084 320.0 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: _-_ 30 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70900 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.5 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.5 28.0 37.7 .00 .07 .07 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.5 28.0 37.7 .00 .07 .07 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 6.0 957.7 1288.0 .00 .07 .75 1.00 2.5 .00015 216.9 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : __- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 31 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70800 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 *****hESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEAk,Y FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.5 28.0 54.4 .00 .05 .05 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 6.0 662.4 1288.0 .00 .05 .35 1.00 2.7 .00032 152.3 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : __ PAGE REY 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 32 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70735 DA: 1288.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.4 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.6 28.0 105.7 .00 .03 .03 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.6 28.0 105.7 .00 .03 .03 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 5.9 341.0 1288.0 .00 .03 .13 1.00 3.5 .00077 85.9 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 33 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70655 DA: 1288.0 SO M1 EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT • 's 0 -.4 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.6 28.0 103.8 .00 .04 .04 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.6 28.0 103.8 .00 .04 .04 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 6.0 347.6 1288.0 .00 .04 .16 1.00 3.5 .00085 86.4 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : -^ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: _ - 34 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70440 DA: 1260.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.4 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.6 28.0 97.2 .00 .10 .10 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.6 28.0 97.2 .00 .10 .10 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 6.1 362.9 1260.0 .00 .10 .43 1.00 3.5 .00071 87.3 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 35 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70406 DA: 1260.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/PT cT 0 -.4 0.0 0.0 \ LOW GRND 1.6 28.0 96.5 .00 .02 .02 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.6 28.0 96.5 .00 .02 .02 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 6.2 365.5 1260.0 .00 .02 .07 1.00 3.5 .00070 87.6 TABLE OF VALUES FOR BPR EQUATION j IF AN $ SYMBOL APPEARS BESIDE A VARIABLE IN THIS TABLE,IT IS EXTRAPOLATED FROM FIGURES 6,7,10, OR 34 OF THE BPR MANUAL. NO. M AKB DLTAK SIGMA DKS COEFK VN2 ALPHA ALPHA2 ALPHA3 AEXIT APPAR DCRIT CRIT FPS SQ FT SQ FT FT COEF 1 1.00 .00 .10 1.00 .00 .10 3.35 1.26 1.26 1.27 381.61 384.72 3.57 .00 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : �r PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$* ALT: 36B ROAD SECTION OAKSDL ------------------- STARTING BRIDGE BRIDGE CULVERT CULVERT WEIR WEIR WEIR NO. HW CFS HL TW CSM CFS AREA CFS AREA CFS AREA TOP WIDTH FT FT FT SQ FT SQ FT SQ FT FT 0 -.54 0.0 0.00 -.54 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 6.25 1260.0 .04 6.21 1.00 1260.0 375.6 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 MIN ROAD ELEVATION = 19.00 FT BRIDGE TYPE = BPR GIRDER BOTTOM ELEVATION = 19.00 FT OPENING NO.: 1 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY $*CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 37 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70375 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.4 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.6 28.0 94.6 .00 .03 .03 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.6 28.0 94.6 .00 .03 .03 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 6.3 372.8 1260.0 .00 .03 .15 1.00 3.5 .00066 88.0 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ___ 38 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70076 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.3 0.0 0.0 Inw r,RNn 1 7 9R n Q9 Q no n n SANK FULL 1.7 28.0 92.9 .00 .12 .12 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 6.4 379.6 1260.0 .00 .12 .55 1.00 3.6 .00062 88.4 •1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : �__ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: -___ 39 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 69746 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.3 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.7 28.0 88.7 .00 .15 .15 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.7 28.0 88.7 .00 .15 .15 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 6.6 397.6 1260.0 .00 .15 .68 1.00 3.6 .00054 89.6 1 TABLE OF VALUES FOR BPR EQUATION IF AN * SYMBOL APPEARS BESIDE A VARIABLE IN THIS TABLE,IT IS EXTRAPOLATED FROM FIGURES 6,7,10, OR 34 OF THE BPR MANUAL. NO. M AKB DLTAK SIGMA DKS COEFK VN2 ALPHA ALPHA2 ALPHA3 AEXIT APPAR DCRIT CRIT FPS SQ FT SQ FT FT COEF 1 1.00 .00 .09 1.00 .00 .09 3.17 1.26 1.26 1.28 399.05 401.80 3.64 .00 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 40B • ROAD SECTION SEVEN ------------------- STARTING BRIDGE BRIDGE CULVERT CULVERT WEIR WEIR WEIR NO. HW CFS HL TW CSM CFS AREA CFS AREA CFS AREA TOP WIDTH FT FT FT SQ FT SQ FT SQ FT FT 0 -.30 0.0 0.00 -.30 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 6.69 1260.0 .04 6.65 1.00 1260.0 397.1 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 MIN ROAD ELEVATION : 19.00 FT BRIDGE TYPE : BPR GIRDER BOTTOM ELEVATION : 16.50 FT OPENING NO.: 1 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 41 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 69686 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.2 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.8 28.0 89.6 .00 .03 .03 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.8 28.0 89.6 .00 .03 .03 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV RELOW FTRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOIATFO I_TNFARIY FROM CHANNFI ROTTOM***** I WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 42 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 69495 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.1 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.9 43.0 108.9 .00 .96 .96 35.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 1.9 43.0 108.9 .00 .96 .96 35.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.2 497.6 1260.0 .00 .96 2.67 1.00 3.4 .00032 97.6 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 43 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68368 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOOOPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .0 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.0 28.0 77.7 .00 .52 .52 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 2.0 28.0 77.7 .00 .52 .52 20.0 ****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.6 454.1 1260.0 .00 .52 2.41 1.00 3.9 .00037 93.3 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 44 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68325 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .0 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.0 28.0 77.4 .00 .02 .02 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 2.0 28.0 77.4 .00 .02 .02 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.6 455.6 1260.0 .00 .02 .09 1.00 3.9 .00036 93.4 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : �__ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: __- 45 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68247 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .0 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.0 28.0 77.0 .00 .04 .04 20.0 tttttMGQ(ZAf C_ FI GV RLI nW LT"T 00nrT1 G GI nig TUTF00l11 AM) I TUA01 V Gonm rw ANNCI Pn TTn Mttttt *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 00 .04 .17 1.00 3.9 .00036 93.6 1 7.6 458.3 1260.0 WS ; -_-- PAGE 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: --__ 46 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68148 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- o NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 20.0 LOW GRND 2.1 28.0 73.1 .00 .05 .05 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 20.0 BANK FULL 2.1 28.0 78.1 .00 .05 .05 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.6 451.8 1260.0 .00 .05 .21 1.00 4.0 .00037 93.2PAGE 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ---_ 47 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68115 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV FTOPE FT WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT 0 ,1 0.0 0.0 20.0 LOW GRND 2.1 28.0 89.7 .00 .02 .02 ***** i ****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM 20.0 BANK FULL 2.1 28.0 89.7 .00 .02 .02 ***** *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM 1 7.6 393.5 1260.0 .00 .02 .06 1.00 4.2 WS0054 83.0PAGE 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- `- 48 REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ___- RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68076 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- N0. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV FTOFT PE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL 0 .1 0.0 0.0 20.0 LOW GRND 2.1 28.0 105.9 .00 .02 .02 ***** *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM 20.0 BANK FULL 2.1 28.0 105.9 .00 .02 .02 ***** *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM 1 7.5 333.2 1260.0 .00 .02 .06 1.00 4.4 .00085 72.5 Wg ; PAGE 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 12:17:58 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- -- _ 49 REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO GRADY WAY **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ----------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- TITLE P-1 CHANNEL PROFILE - PUMP PLANT TO GRADY WAY ENDJOB ******************************NORMAL END OF JOB------------------------------ �«'J 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: °---------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- ENDRUN SCS WSP2 VERSION 11/01/90 FILE SUMMARY INPUT = abpp-gr.dat OUTPUT = abpp-gr.run DATED 03/25/93 12:17:58 * i WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 13:47:25 .r WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: I ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- WSP2 30. ITLE ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WITLE ===> SIDE CHANNEL ONLY TITLE POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** DISCHARGE -24.8 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 STARTE SIDEI 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 OUTPUT S COMMENT * * SIDE CHANNEL OPEN ## $ $## COMMENT ****SR405 AND GRADY BOXES AS OPEN CHANNELS**** COMMENT -----DISCHARGES FROM 1980 ESGR HYDROLOGY------ REACHSIDEI 600.0 0. 0. REACH SIDE2 600.0 110.0 110.0 REACH SIDE3 600.0 90.0 90.0 REACH SIDE4 600.0 100.0 100.0 REACH SIDES 600.0 70.0 70.0 SECTION SIDE1 0.0 14.0 32.0 2.0 58.0 2.0 74.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SIDEI 1.0 C 32.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT SIDEI 2.0 C 58.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SIDEI 3.0 C 74.0 NVALUE 0.040 SECTION SIDE2 0.0 14.0 31.0 2.0 40.0 2.0 52.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SIDE2 1.0 C 52.0 NVALUE 0.025 SECTION SIDE3 0.0 14.0 24.0 2.0 37.0 2.0 62.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SIDE3 1.0 C 24.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT SIDE3 2.0 C 37.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SIDE3 3.0 C 62.0 NVALUE 0.40 SECTION SIDE4 0.0 10.0 19.0 2.0 37.0 2.0 62.0 14.0 ENDTABLE 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 13:47:25 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 1 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT SIDE4 1.0 C 37.0 NVALUE 0.025 • EGMENT SIDE4 2.0 C 62.0 NVALUE 0.040 SECTION SIDES 0.0 14.0 0.1 2.68 29.0 2.68 35.0 0.18 47.0 0.18 53.0 2.68 60.0 2.68 66.0 2.0 83.0 2.0 109.0 14.0 ENDTABLE t NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT SIDE5 2.0 C 29.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SIDE5 3.0 C 53.0 NVALUE 0.40 SEGMENT SIDE5 4.0 C 83.0 �IVALUE 0.025 ?`il'SEGMENT SIDE5 5.0 C 109.0 NVALUE 0.40 COMPUTE SIDEI SIDE5 SIDEI ------------------------------END OF DATA LISTING------------------------------ I COMPUTE SIDEI SIDE5 SIDEI I ------------------------------STARTING DATA FROM GIVEN ELEVATION------------------------------ 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 13:47:25 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN ##CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$ ALT: ___ 2 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SIDEI DA: 600.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.5 203.6 600.0 .00 .00 .00 1.00 4.4 .00038 48.0 2 7.5 203.6 480.0 .00 .00 .00 .80 4.1 .00025 48.0 3 7.5 203.6 360.0 .00 .00 .00 .60 3.7 .00014 48.0 4 7.5 203.6 240.0 .00 .00 .00 .40 3.3 .00006 48.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SIDEI SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 600. 55. 520. 25. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.42 1.37 3.63 1.23 2 DISCHARGE CFS 480. 44. 416. 20. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.74 1.10 2.91 .99 3 DISCHARGE CFS 360. 33. 312. 15. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.05 .82 2.18 .74 4 DISCHARGE CFS 240. 22. 208. 10. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.37 .55 1.45 .49 1 ELEV 7.5 KD 30583. 2816. 26499. 1268. 2 ELEV 7.5 KD 30583. 2816. 26499. 1268. 3 ELEV 7.5 KD 30583. 2816. 26499. 1268. 4 ELEV 7.5 KD 30583. 2816. 26499, 1268. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 13:47:25 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS ____ PAGE • REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGNO ALT: 3 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SIDE2 DA: 600.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- N0. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP CT Cr) CT PCQ CI nnnni Arlo rnrni you 11- 11- ..­ 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1 7.4 100.2 600.0 .00 .07 .07 1.00 6.0 .00218 28.2 2 7.4 101.7 480.0 .00 .07 .07 .80 5.5 .00134 28.4 3 7.5 102.6 360.0 .00 .07 .07 .60 5.0 .00073 28.6 4 7.5 103.3 240.0 .00 .07 .07 .40 4.4 .00032 28.6 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SIDE2 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 C ---------------------------------------------------•--------------------------------------------------------------------- e 1 DISCHARGE CFS 600. 600. 1. VELOCITY FPS 6.00 5.99 2 DISCHARGE CFS 480. 480. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.73 4.72 3 DISCHARGE CFS 360. 360. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.51 3.51 4 DISCHARGE CFS 240. 240. 0. VELOCITY FPS 2.33 2.32 1 ELEV 7.4 KD 12857. 12857. 2 ELEV 7.4 KD 13117. 13117. 3 ELEV 7.5 KD 13286. 13286. 4 ELEV 7.5 KD 13407. 13407. 1 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 13:47:25 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN'l� ALT: 4 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SIDE3 DA: 600.0 SA MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA A ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SA FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.3 127.9 600.0 .00 .07 .07 1.00 5.4 .00167 34.8 2 7.4 130.0 480.0 .00 .07 .07 .80 5.0 .00102 35.0 3 7.4 131.4 360.0 .00 .07 .07 .60 4.5 .00056 35.2 4 7.5 132.5 240.0 .00 .07 .07 .40 4.0 .00024 35.4 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SIDE3 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 600. 78. 514. 8. 1. VELOCITY FPS 6.94 2.72 7.41 .27 2 DISCHARGE CFS 480. 63. 411, 7. 1. VELOCITY FPS 5.48 2.14 5.85 .22 • 3 DISCHARGE CFS 360. 47. 308. 5. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.07 1.59 4.35 .16 4 DISCHARGE CFS 240. 32. 205. 3. 0. VELOCITY FPS 2.69 1.05 2.88 .11 I ELEV 7.3 KD 14694. 1891. 12605. 198. 2 ELEV 7.4 KD 15003. 1950. 12848. 204. 3 ELEV 7.4 KD 15220. 1992. 13020. 209. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 13:47:25 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ___ 5 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SIDE4 DA: 600.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** ` 1 7.9 186.2 600:0 .00 .10 .10 1.00 4.9 .00050 44.5 2 7.8 178.2 480.0 .00 .10 .10 .80 4.5 .00036 43.7 3 7.6 172.6 360.0 .00 .10 .10 .60 4.1 .00022 43.2 4 7.6 169.1 240.0 .00 .10 .10 .40 3.6 .00010 42.8 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SIDE4 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 600. 540. 60, 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.48 3.62 1.61 2 DISCHARGE CFS 480. 433. 47. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.91 3.02 1.34 3 DISCHARGE CFS 360. 326. 34. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.25 2.34 1.03 4 DISCHARGE CFS 240. 217. 23. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.53 1.59 .70 1 ELEV 7.9 KD 26700. 24060. 2640. 2 ELEV 7.8 KD 25194. 22759. 2435. 3 ELEV 7.6 KD 24148 21853. 2295. 4 ELEV 7.6 KD 23491. 21283. 2208. *****WARNING - SECT. SIDES KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 15.60 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE *M* *****WARNING - SECT. SIDES KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 1 AT ELEVATION 17.00 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ***** 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 13:47:25 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 6 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SIDES DA: 600.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.0 29.8 32.6 .00 .03 .03 20.7 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** • 1 8.1 548.0 600.0 .00 .15 .15 1.00 3.1 .00008 96.2 2 7.9 526.7 480.0 .00 .15 .15 .80 3.0 .00006 95.7 3 7.7 510.7 360.0 .00 .15 .15 .60 2.7 .00004 95.3 4 7.6 499.7 240.0 .00 .15 .15 .40 2.3 .00002 95.1 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SIDES • CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 C C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 600. 0. 263. 22. 312. 3. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.70 .00 1.68 .12 1.77 .07 2 DISCHARGE CFS 480. 0. 210. 18. 250. 2. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.42 .00 1.40 .10 1.48 .06 3 DISCHARGE CFS 360. 0. 157. 13. 188. 2. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.10 .00 1.08 .08 1.14 .04 4 DISCHARGE CFS 240. 0. 104. 9. 125. 1. 0. VELOCITY FPS .75 .00 .74 .06 .78 .03 1 ELEV 8.1 KD 65326. 11. 28649. 2379. 33993. 294. 2 ELEV 7.9 KD 61074. 11. 26688. 2259. 31850. 266. 3 ELEV 7.7 KD 57967, 10. 25259. 2170. 30282. 246. 4 ELEV 7.6 KD 55903. 10. 24312. 2110. 29238. 233. 1 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 13:47:25 ESGR ----> AS-BUILT CONDITION <---- WS _-__ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 7 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- TITLE P-1 CHANNEL PROFILE - SIDE CHANNEL ENDJOB ******************************NORMAL END OF JOB------------------------------ 1 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 13:47:25 WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: 1 . ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- ENDRUN *************************************************************************** SCS WSP2 VERSION 11/01/90 FILE SUMMARY INPUT = ab-side.dat OUTPUT = ab-side.run DATED 03/25/93 13:47:25 *************************************************************************** ■ t :■ s■ a:■ + : SS1 1 ■■ S u�: � : S i as _■ ■ =ii '� ■ IN so ■ �. t•■ . :■m .. an ■■ ..a win ■ 0 INN ON 0 INN IF man mom III It S �/ s::::Smmmommosson 0 :■�S:iitt.�a�:::i'��Il attttt■tton ■■ulmmmmmm5mm■mmosmm ■■ S7SII1Sj■•■o■ooEms ■ so■ smsommmonsao0HHOUR 11■ t■■■O■s■■E ■ sso■maaa m■mmo■s/■ ■m■mmxmnwmmtCMlli.■■■mmmmm■mmnm S ��■■j�� ■ ■■:■■tot■ ■ttt•■•■•■■:t■ •t�■r�tttl�ili�■ttttt■■■none =:=■m■=iiNi��i�s: � :■� _ ■.■..■S■■t:oaosoommmms■tC:to�Sio/.Si�lli.mmatstmemmeSs ■■■■■ ■■■■ma ■ ■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■��i ■u� ■!J/■ ■■Nib■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ Ono ■ ■■e�o� ■� moot :SN■ SSi:E : mom•otaS■s■..a■ist■t■t..etS�ttteLYiJtt:mmassom:as ■ a ■ ■ N/■■■a ante//■■ t■ritttttt ■■■a1�11�// N■■■/■ /e S 0 on ■ S ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■tit■■■■//■//■■■■■mo■aos■ ■/11 ■■/■Sass■■■■ ■ so: ■ ■n■:■ ■ :: ■■ : ■■Sotsetaiotasst■is■oN■e■•■■■t:was S•■sso■■■so•■Sa ■ ■ tN■ ■ ■:�■tm ■■t■ Sts = amtt=a:■ ■s::: : m ■ ■ rmlS SSS: we NONEmom st■tmt■tali ■ostooSt■ mttsts■ttt■m ■ ■s■ Nto■ ■ 0 amosomms Oman am so . . .... . . ...■.NEON NOON■■mammom nomormonamemong same eamamm■■m■■asomo■■■■mamsma■ ./.. o ■q a ::S:Si:S: = _:■t :S:S S ■oommo■t<s•s■m net■ . ' SSS=■S_s■ ■ nos i ■ ami ■am :soommSS:::mi' es■omm/■■■seem a � :n _ g ' u: lSS MENEm liessommommosesm im S m � iiiomi memo SSCSmSSSSS SSSSSSSSSoSS:Sn :■ mmmmmmo Sm l iomu ■ ill■otmomm■m■ none• •t ■ ■■■sss■■on"tsomme■■ ■■s/.ammmmssmmso■■mmm■■:ioss■m■■sssmmtmom/tmmmmmmmaaa ii . ■ :■■Bi_■N•■_�i mm as■smmsmuaa ....�1•...........�1......■........t....................■ ■oom■o■o ttC.��a .. sm■■■■■■■■m ■soon■ ■■■■mm■■■■mm■e■smmmmss■mmm•■a =mttta=a::■ atatmmmlgmmosntt st�tmmtm■.mmm■tt:mtmmt•tmattmmnttt■tm■ m■ IFIll ommtomm■mm■m:o:■:/:m■■m■■mm ■ ■mat:m:ammm ■ a ■ ■ on so mom 1k.88INIIIIII ■H■ Im■■m■■s■mosso■mos■arvs■E■mmmmEms■:■oommommose:ass nett N msi:s■sm/mmto■amm■ ■ ■ io■mommano■mssen mo onsom■ ms Mason ■oto 111 somSomme■•SN�aaS M■SmoH:•mmomtmaamm/a IN :S�S =ONE memo NEON ::S SSSSSSSSS::SS=■••Sammosommomm m.. ■t n �i ■ :e �1iSa�i:sue:i :::s:::Si:::::_:::::s:iii::::s:::::::s::w::s:::::::_ �iii ■ =■tt■t■ttttmt■ t■mmt■at■ttt�1 •■a■mm■•'tt■ ante onto= :a S mme of:m o:Sooi:mlti�iSN/ m �momS■ ■ nets of■aaatttm■■■ttsttttt■ mmmstt■■setmm■■tmst■Smmos:mmmom■ i� t:at■ : : eu::�:SS:SS:�■it:S:SS:manom S:S in ■ tSs:=ON SS■ :: SSSSS=SSi=S:S:Siiiiii�iii:Sss:SiSSSSSSSS:SSSSS1asomommonomsii a I::s:::::■nilm a s:•mi:sa::t:i�iil� C a ■--own■■■■ n:= ■ ■ PAN ■ ■■ut� .■■■■■■■�.•■.•.■■ .■■:nsmm:••■mmonneo•emm tnmams m ■ 'on Mo ■ d e:■mss■s■■mmnmms■/mmmmMmS•e..■mm ■mesNasmmmmm■ ■tenses •�S o N•S s s■ : ■t ■ ■ ms:=:SS::::sons::::sonommomm s: mots.. st:• . . .. . .................Smmammm■sS■ssmtmt000mtmmsmmoo■emt■ssmmS•o ■•■••■ ■one N S s• N■Ns■t•t000■tottntttoot•tmo Smstmatt■ott■■ttt■ttto•tnt■= �:'�ii='■M :stm� Ss:mm■■a 0lei==SimiossommmmommosoiOman wasommsmommoi . .. .... C:::S::i:::::::se on ■ oil an ago MEN a N ' ■ ■a 0No a ' a■ alms:aan MEN • ■ ■ ■ at. ONE me all 0 ■N1 �11.:.■■.lHr V a: alms■ ■ :: :■ ' ' Is ell MisMB � ' ::"a � :I ■ 1: :■■:mm: e■ ■ :: 1■ .I ■.■ .. ■■■ : ! ::� : ■ : alum■ ■ ■ :■ ■:menn n■sm mN en �rra I■ ■ : ■ / ■ ■ INS: :elu■�g.eose: E 1 I :..E . :��:::::: ::mod :■ 11: h L"11 an ■ ■ ■ ■ memo■■■ ■Em.m�e■.Rom■■meE R ■■ e■:: end ■ A ■ ■.alms. a '�: Mom moosmoo'N:'■esolonoloominionsims ..■.= :1�:.■::..�3:..:,:o l! I is:■...■� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ anN ■■ MEMO ■ ..ale ►�mmm�■■ . I : em■mmosom : " I : :: BanmN .. 11 mmsEo■R11O■ �■ ■ Nu /Mee.■■ ■Hm11111101111711111■Em II ..■■ an ■R ■ NE ■ ■ ■ ■■ .o.N►1eRN■.■r■■■.■.■■■■.Mal ■■116 ■emmm mums ■ ■ ■ Em ■ :ale ■■Ent■■■ ale■nN■.■.■ meel� : ':Iu■LO11 ammo:m■■■ : : .■ : ■o��I� :/ Sam ou■■mane■� om■■uomn_ .tam.e 11 ■anomie■■ ■ :::. :. : .e :g low ■mammo mmummoso 161541:Huai elf■NI II' :::■:.:an ::gels:::::::::� ::::: '� '� lolll MEN ■ ■■ JWI■n■ ■ ■■ale■■■.■ ME ale a RE 1 .■■ ■ ■ ■ e■me■■s■■■■nm.■■nomNo.mo MEN mosommemsoso a■IN ono 11 �1 No __ . . ■zommossomsommossoemom■■o ON msooass g`1 :� me so ■ ■ : ■ ri'i1'ili7:::::::'�'m:■c=: :: :::o::'=i'.ENRON.::INS:. : ■ ■ Oe M.■ ■ � oemMm■sm�nriem ale■■■■ WIN ■■ : ■ :: o.:■ _■ ..■.o■WIeo■ �..:..Mal■ :■i .omems.M ■mosom : rm _= ono�rim:■■■■memomm:sonom=oso:massNoseNnowEaleslosimmesomm all 9 .o =�.■eWI.mo■■■■.■.N■■■ ■■Mosome INNWI ■ om om OEM oommommmuselamn :::::gig a ". : :o::::i: : ::is "':i�■■:o■::MMmlllM mMM MMMmm :::::::::::■:::NMI a =OME ■ ■:. MEN NomaC'::: ii i i■ :EOM_ ■■MmO ■OR■EMEmm■e�nm■emmR■emO■Emmu■■ON■■.■■■■m�aWIoo■M■■■nm■es■n■■■::::.iMEE ...:E:■MM11 ':■.. : ... �i�ii:■WIN■ .momm■nommoossomm■m■ ■u.N.oN.■o■■...m■.......................moimmmommm ... Oil m MIN mn ■■mme■ ■ NM: e■ IN Er mu WINNER■SON mosommen ON :n■Minm■ ■um■■:■:Hal■ ■ ■um.m■m■■mmemo■en■■n ■s::=Rom=no" m■ee ale lgal= mmummonow�::: :mo: ==:':'N�::■ " ■ eE ' :NNm: NENN■■N■E.mNE.e■en:Nmn■■m.■■■.m■WIMNm■ ■■■■Neale :::goal::u : �a ::SSW 11,11WI ::.'�i'.?i::ii:::::::::1=1'i:::r�.::::::::::::1'r::1='i:nommossam ■eoo■ ■..mOne me o ■ ■ Mne,- aleale■/HHm■nsomemememmem o _MM 0:■nn omens:emoommssommo on mmo■ ■■ ■ ■/,m■E ennenom ammo ■ ■ ann■WINR emm■nsom on ■ ■ Nei : ■ i 'm�Iusii::EoM:::'mumm 0 :n':allummummus : ....... ....■"am:........o: ..........E...woman ' ME Sami1�'I�'on :�'m"1�: on ME gills 10 1::::::::: : ■ m■em■mn�MEgsm Mom mmogsom ■ ■ ■■seem■mm�O■ MM soon MEMO Now mE goal. :: .: : M n:: : : :::::::::::so::::::::::::::::::::::::lI::::::1::l ■g ::g _ . :o :: 'a Man::: :: _:_�::::: : ::::::: ::::: :::: ::: ::::::_:a so ■ ■ ::� mommomosoms ' : :: ':: Rome■:■■■.N■.N■.■.mWINRingso■WI.:emon oHM■■■� eon:':� : as N:p■ ■ so ■ ■ ■ ■ ■mu0 so : :t��a1cJ■:M ■ ■ e.WI:■/ ■nmmonsom: :■m■ ■Nmmu■ EN■ . :so a : ■ ..Noma■:■ ■ ■ ■ .■:■n mas.=i■■■.■..m■■.e ■:■:memo a1"ME■:Ease:a.N■NN�:�N■NE■..: ■ ■ ■ :goal ■ ■ ' ' E' '� ' ■•■ �■�':::N: :::�sglimp N. : m :E:N:::m■/■■WIN:.WIN■::ems■�E::�mE■E■M:.m:eEEEeme:■■Em:e:m::o L O W F L O W C H A N N E L WSP2 LOW FLOW CHANNEL SUMMARY SHEET ESGR Connecting Channel Design Q=20cfs at the pump plant W.S ELEV AT W.S ELEV AT POND=0.0 POND=2 .0 STATION Q(cfs) TOP OF TOP OF WATER X-SECT WATER X-SECT COMMENTS BANK BANK SURF. AREA SURF. AREA ELEV AREA ELEV. ELEV. 706+55 20.0 1.6 28.0 1.3 22.9 2 .1 55.9 Begin L.F. Channel b=8, d=2, z=3 704+40 19.6 1.6 28.0 1.4 24.6 2 .1 56 .6 Out of bank flow with pond WS @ 2 ' 704+06 19.6 1.6 28.0 1.4 24.8 2 . 1 56 .7 OAKSDALE 703+75 19 .6 1.6 28.0 1.5 25.2 2. 1 58.2 " 697+46 19 .6 1.7 28.0 1.6 25.0 2 .1 54.2 " SEVENTH 696+86 19 .6 1.8 28.0 1.7 25.2 2 .2 49 .6 " •c694+95 19.6 1.9 28.0 1.9 30.9 2 .2 52 .5 Out of bank flow Pond WS @ 0 & 2 ' 683+68 19 .6 2 .0 I 28.0 2 . 1 33.6 2 .3 48.2 IS 683+25 19 .6 2.0 28.0 I 2 . 1 34.1 2 .3 48 .4 18 682+47 19.6 2 .0 28.0 I 2 . 1 34.9 2 .3 48.8 to 681+48 19.6 2 . 1 28.0 2 . 1 30.0 2 .4 43.2 of 681+15 19 .6 2 . 1 28.0 2 . 1 30. 1 2 .4 40.9 " 680+76 19.6 2 . 1 28.0 2 . 1 30.0 2 .4 38.5 " GRADd 19 .6 --- --- 2 . 1 27.4 2 .4 39 .0 Be 677+80 19.3 2 .6 47.8 2 .2 37.8 2 .4 43.0 In bank flow b=121 , d=2 .5 ' 677+10 19 .3 2 .6 47.8 2 .2 37.6 2 .4 42.8 " • 674+48 19.3 2 .7 47.8 2 .2 36 .3 2 .4 41.4 " 672+38 19 .3 2 .7 47.8 2 .2 35.6 2 .4 40.6 " COMPUTATION SHEET U. a. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-323 Rev. "9 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE Pr PROJECT fQ / -I+�,L — �7k�,t 30 By DATE/i3 I CHECKED BY DATE f� JOB 0. SUBJECT G,=I dG/ SHEET OF t�'cmtinv = �QSe "�Ivv1 I►1 l0,j �1ocJ G�7un11� fbr input 117 P�/SPz ern last /'ecord� /rI�/lc cl`G Ma ZZ fY'p.r! JU�2 I f 7 s �• L4 Nis. z 1, 1 r,o S /day F ; �, S87 , ton� cflGl y i COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev. "9 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE WA PROJECT E SaZ- P I G���hQ' _ S� l lo w tU BY DAT 7 CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT �` ���CL �rQLIIiC.S SHEET OF �OSlew� L��Ct,Yi„�v y ,.r 1��j0 loyr °Q' fvr I�Fud 198o yye�.�� Car fv� �iydro/�y Q,o= o ioe-fs ftS n�G 7rld All 19941 y E ,e wa Errs/od i 5 'iz wa y ) 9 P-)o a✓3 4-44 e. �u .r� CArd, { o✓� /o is = Z73 e-f6 /O io f 27� = iz88 c{s s COMPUTATION SHEET U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SCS-ENG-523 Rev. B--69 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE STATE PROJECT ltil� C ha n n el BY DATE? 89 CHECKED BY DATE JOB NO. SUBJECT r )clz SHEET OF .i`•' .t'i F C�ive✓� Tapa�r•�a�._��s�t�_i._ , r ; i z oy- _ t -1-- - 2`eritl- - --,_ , , h t„8/3 5t'L I Zg/3 ooDZ�v •. .Aiti•: ti rwi ,;r1s-id 1,. w-. 7ah '••,,p--w r r'rt•aK1�,s ' —r- -r k •i.t av w v r: +ta +rg FS-55 Operation General Operation The facility is arranged for fully automatic pumping of stream flows up to 375 cfs. Above this capacity it will be necessary to manually start the large diesel driven pumps as required. They each have a capacity +� of 514 cfs. The upstream and downstream water levels are recorded on a Foxboro chart recorder in the main control panel. Readout of the upstream level is also telemetered over a telephone line to King County Flood Control office. When the water level reaches 4.0 feet it is necessary to man the station and start the large pumps. With the main panel switch on "auto" these pumps will automatically stop as the water level falls to +3.75 feet. The manual part of the facility is omitted from the following operational sequences. For operation of these pumps see elsewhere in this book. The upstream water level operates level controllers LC1 and LC3. The downstream water level operates LC2. These level controllers are used to automatically operate flood control pumps Pl, (electric drive) and P2 & P4, (diesel drive), false weir pump P9, gear cooling pump P12, diesel fuel pump P13, and the airlift blower C2. The operational sequences are manually programmed to fit four basic programs: A. Upstream fish migration - Aug. 15 to Feb. 1 _Fie 4 p o B. Non-cropping season - Nov. 1 - May 1. C. Downstream fish migration - April 1 - June 15. D. Cropping season - May 1 - Nov. 1. For ease of comprehension the following operational procedures are written around the four seasonal subtitles stressing the fish migration periods and -26- ignoring the overlapping time zones. Instructions are included within the texts to cover the change between the cropping and non-cropping seasons. Upstream Fish Migration (Aug. 15 to Feb. l) (See Appendix) On August 15 the control for the upstream fish migration system should be turned to automatic where it will stay until February 1 when it is turned off. This will permit automatic operation of the false weir pump (p9) and the fishway gate SG2 solenoid valve (SV10) . The controls for the flood control pumps (Pl, P2 & P4) , gear cooling pump (P12) and the diesel fuel 1 pump (P13) should all be turned to the automatic position. ' The first 2 1/2 months of this 5 1/2 month period will be during the cropping season; therefore, level controller LCl should be in the lower setting and the pool elevation will be nominally 0.0 feet. Sequence of Operation 1. Assume the water level, downstream, is below +12.0 feet and the upstream pool elevation is above +0.25 feet. Level control switch LC1-a and LC2-a are open and relay R3 is de-energized. R3 contact in the upstream migration system is closed and as the switch was turned to "auto" the false weir pump (P9) and the fishway gate SG-2 solenoid valve (SV10) were energized. This opened the fishway gate and provided 2,700 gpm (6 cfs) to the false weir. The 2,700 gpm is divided between the fishway chute (approximately 450 gpm, 1 cfs) and the Denil flume (approximately 2,250 gpm, 5 cfs) using the adjustable vane to achieve the desired water balance. If the water downstream reaches +12'0" normally open contact LC2-a closes, energizing R3, thereby shutting down the system. This prevents water from backing up through the facility. -27- 1� If the water in the upstream pool drops below 0.0 feet LCl.ra closes. } energizing R3, thereby shutting down the system. Indicating lights are provided on the control panel to show the pump status and the solenoid valve operation position. 2. When the pool elevation rises to 0.50 feet level switch LC1-b closes, energizing R8. R8 starts P12 (gear cooling water pump) and starts a permissive circuit in the control circuit of Pl (flood control and fish attraction. pump) . When the desired gear cooling water flow is achieved FS-2 energizes Rl completing the permissive circuit and Pl starts. Pl. provides 75 cfs of fish attraction water in the fish ladder entrance channel. Pumps P9 and Pl should be adequate to control the level of the pool during this period. If the pool level drops to +0.25 feet level LC1-b opens shutting down Pl and P12 and if the level continues to drop to 0.0 feet LC1-a opens, shutting down P9 and closing SG-2. If the water level continues to rise (after Pl and P9 are running) the first diesel pump will be called upon to assist in controlling the flow. 3. As the pool level reaches +1.0 feet, level LC1-c closes energizing R4, the toggle relay (RT) and timing relay (T) . These relays combine with Rl (previously energized by the gear cooling water flow switch) and start either P2 or P4 depending upon the action of the toggle relay. This relay automatically alternates P2 and P4 to become the lead pump for the / -28 the next sequence of operation. R4 also starts the diesel fuel pump. Either P2 or P4 provides 150 cfs of flood control pumping. 4. If the pool level continues to rise to +1.5 feet LCl-d closes and starts P2 or P4 (backup pump from Step 3 above) . This will provide an additional 150 cfs of pumping capacity. 5. If additional pumping is required it will be necessary to man the station and manually start the cooling water pump P11 and flood pumps. P3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 as required. Once started these pumps will automatically stop when water drops to +3.75 feet when the main panel switch is on "Auto." 6. As the pool level falls to 0.25 feet LCl-c and d open dropping out relays R4 and R5. This in turn shuts down P2, P4 and P13. Any time Pl, P2 or P4 is running, should the gear cooling water supply fail, relay R1 will drop out and shut down the pumps. At the end of the cropping season (Nov. 1) the pool elevation will be raised 2.0 feet. This is accomplished by moving level control LC1 to the upper setting. This adjustment will not change the above described sequences except that the level switch LC-1 contacts will operate at +2.0 feet above the levels indicated. Non-Cropping Season: (Feb. 1 - April 1) At the end of the upstream migration season Feb. 1 the false weir pump (P9) and the fishway gate SG2 solenoid valve (SV10) are not required; therefore -29- 1 the upstream fish migration facility control should be turned to "off." Flood control pumps (Pl, P2 and P4) , gear cooling pump (P12) and the diesel fuel pump (P13) should be left in the automatic position. The level controller LC1 should be left in the upper setting thereby holding a nominal upstream pool elevation of +2.0 feet. Sequence of Operation 1. As water rises to +2.50 feet LCl-b closes energizing R8 relay. R8 starts P12 (gear cooling water pump) and starts a permissive circuit in - the controls of Pl. When the gear cooling flow is established flow switch FS-2 closes and energizes Rl, thereby completing the circuit to start Pl. Pl provides 75 cfs of flood control pumping. 2. If the pool level continues to rise to 3.0 feet LC1-c closes operating R4, the toggle relay (Rt) and timing relay (T) . These relays combine with R1 (previously energized by the gear cooling water flow switch) to start either P2 or P4, the selection depending upon the action of the toggle relay. This relay automatically alternates P2 or P4 to become the lead pump for the next operation. Most toggle relay coils are not continuous duty rates, therefore the timing relay (T) is added to de-energize the coil after a 2 second delay. R4 also starts the diesel fuel pump, P13. This second step provides 150 cfs of flood control pumping. 3. As the pool level rises to 3.5 feet LCl-d closes energizing R5• R5 relay starts the backup pump (P2 or P4) not caused to operate as described in Step 2 above. This step provides an additional 150 cfs of flood control. -30- Operation 4. Should the water level continue to rise to +4.0 feet the cooling water pump Pll and flood control pumps P3, 5, 6, 7 and 8 as required must be manually started to provide additional pumping. Once started, these pumps will stop automatically as water drops to +3.75 feet , with the main panel switch on "Auto. " 5. When the pool level falls to +2.25 feet LCl-b, c, and d open, dropping out relays R4, R5, and R8. These in turn shut down P2, P4 & P13 and P1 & P12. Downstream Fish Migration: (April 1 to dune 15) The start of this migration will be in the non-cropping season. The level controller LCl should be left in the upper setting, thus maintaining a nominal upstream pool elevation of +2.0 feet. The control for the downstream fish migration system should be turned to "automatic ." This will permit automatic operation of the airlift compressor (C2) , Roto-Valve (SG-1) driven by solenoid (SV-9) and the airlift diverter solenoid valve (SV-8) . The controls for Pl, P2, P4, P12 and P13 should be left in automatic . Sequence of Operation (See Appendix regarding C-2) 1. Assume the water level downstream is below +12.0 feet and the upstream elevation is at the nominal 2.0 feet. LC2-b is open, LC3-a is open and LC3-c is open; therefore R9 and R10 are de-energized. The R10 contact in the upstream migration system is closed and as the switch was turned to automatic the airlift compressor C2 and the Roto Valve solenoid valve SV-9 were energized. LC3-b is open; therefore, the sluice gate opened and air was provided to the sparge ring of the airlift pipe for the lower fish ports (elevation - 2.0 feet) . If the -31- upstream water level rises to +2.5 feet LC3-b closes, energizing R-7 and in turn SV-8. This transfers the air supply to the airlift pipe for the upper fish ports (el. +2.0 feet). If the upstream pool elevation drops to -2.0 feet or the downstream channel raises to 12.0 feet LC3-a or LC2-b closes, energizing R10 which shuts this system down. If the upstream pool elevation rises to +4.0 feet LC3-c closes energizing R9 which in turn energizes R10, thereby shutting this system down. Indicator lights are provided on the control panel to show the compressor status and solenoid valves positions. 2. The flood control during this time period is accomplished by use of the pumps P1, P2 and P4 and the support pumps P12 (gear cooling water) and P13 (diesel fuel). See Non-Cropping Season for detailed operation of this system. 3. Additional flood control is accomplished by using the manually operated pumps P3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and the support pump P11. If it is necessary to start P3 the fish screens must be raised. On May 1 it will be necessary to change from the non-cropping to the cropping season. To do this, level controller LC1 must be changed from the upper to the lower setting. This will change the nominal upstream pool elevation from 2.0 to 0.0 feet. This will change the operating levels of the fish migration and automatic pumping facilities. Cropping Season (June 15 to Aug. 15) At the end of the downstream fish migration season, June 15, the airlift compressor (C2) Roto-Valve (SG-1) solenoid valve (SV-9) and the airlift -32- diverter solenoid valve (Sv-8) are no longer required; therefore, the ;J control for the downstream fish migration system should be turned to off and the screens raised. The level controller LC1 is already set at the lower setting which establishes a pool elevation of 0.0 feet. The controls for Pl, P2, P4, P12 and P13 should be left in automatic. Sequence of Operation 1. Primary river flow is accomplished using flood control pumps P1, P2 and P4 and the support pumps P12 (gear cooling water) and P13 (diesel fuel) . For detailed sequential operation of these pumps see Non- Cropping Season. 2. Additional water flow is accomplished using the manually controlled flood pumps P3, P5, 6, 7 and 8 and the cooling water pump P11. Fish Screen Maintenance Notation (See Appendix) For removal of the fish screens from their slots it will first be necessary to disconnect the ground wires from the channel supporting the screen hoist. The bolt securing the grounding lugs to the channel is a captive bolt held to the underneath lug. Remove the nut on the top end of this bolt--do not unscrew the clamping set screw holding the wire in the lug. -33- I a P2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 "r WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: 1 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- WSP2 30. TITLE ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- OITLE POND TO SW 16TH RUN $*CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN#* DISCHARGE -24.8 0.01553 0.01553 0.01553 STARTE 72963 0.0 1.0 2.0 OUTPUT S COMMENT ******SR405 AND GRADY BOXES AS OPEN CHANNELSOM* COMMENT $#$$ # $ $$ $$$ BRIDGE AT SW 16TN $ $#$ $ COMMENT BRIDGE AT 7TH ST. # $ $ $ COMMENT #$$# ##$# $ # BRIDGE AT OAKSDALE $$ ##$#$#$## COMMENT 20 CFS BASE FLOW FROM PUMP PLANT DISCHARGE RECORDS REACH 72963 1288.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 REACH 72890 1288.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 REACH 72700 1288.0 190.0 190.0 190.0 190.0 REACH 72515 1288.0 185.0 185.0 185.0 185.0 REACH 72300 1288.0 215.0 215.0 215.0 215.0 REACH 72230 1283.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 REACH 72150 1288.0 165.0 80.0 165.0 165.0 REACH `000 1288.0 153.0 150.0 153.0 153.0 REACH 11850 1288.0 142.0 150.0 142.0 142.0 REACH 71750 1288.0 92.0 92.0 92.0 92.0 REACH 71643 1288.0 103.0 107.0 103.0 103.0 REACH 71500 1288.0 140.0 143.0 140.0 140.0 REACH 71385 1288.0 60.0 115.0 60.0 60.0 REACH 71250 1288.0 75.0 135.0 75.0 75.0 REACH 71150 1288.0 37.0 100.0 37.0 37.0 REACH 71050 1288.0 35.0 100.0 35.0 35.0 40,EACH 70900 1288.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 REACH 70800 1288.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 REACH 70735 1288.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 REACH 70655 1288.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 REACH 70440 1260.0 215.0 215.0 215.0 215.0 REACH 70406 1260.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 ROAD OAKSDL 2.7 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 REACH 70375 1260.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 REACH 70076 1260.0 269.0 269.0 269.0 269.0 REACH 69746 1260.0 330.0 330.0 330.0 330.0 ROAD SEVEN 2.7 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 REACH 69686 1260.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 REACH 69495 1260.0 1191.0 1191.0 1191.0 1191.0 REACH 68368 1260.0 1127.0 1127.0 1127.0 1127.0 REACH 68325 1260.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 REACH 68247 1260.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 REACH 68148 1260.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 99.0 REACH 68115 1260.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN $$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN#$ ALT: 1 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ REACH 68076 1260.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 REACH GRADd 1240.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 'EACH GRADu 1240.0 196.0 196.0 196.0 196.0 EACH 67780 1240.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 REACH 67710 1240.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 REACH I405d 1240.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 REACH I405u 1240.0 170.0 170.0 170.0 170.0 REACH 67448 1240.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 REACH 67238 1240.0 210.0 210.0 210.0 210.0 op8ru SWlAd 1940 0 90 0 50 0 50.0 50 6 SECTION 72963 { ' 0.0 14.0 0.0 -8.0 165.0 -8.0 165.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 72963 1.0 C 165.0 14.0 NVALUE 0.035 �iECTION 72890 0.0 14.0 28.0 0.0 44.0 -8.0 209.0 -8.0 225.0 0.0 235.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 72890 1.0 N 28.0 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72890 2.0 C 225.0 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 72890 3.0 N 235.0 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 72700 0.0 14.0 42.0 0.0 52.8 -3.6 217.8 -3.6 228.6 0.0 270.6 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 72700 1.0 N 42.0 r NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72700 2.0 C 228.6 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 72700 3.0 N 270.6 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 72515 0.0 14.0 7.5 11.5 27.5 11.5 56.0 2.0 64.4 -0.8 229.4 -0.8 237.8 2.0 273.8 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 72515 1.0 D 7.5 �IVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72515 2.0 D 27.5 1 WSP2 XEG 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN $CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$ ALT: 2 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 72515 3.0 N 56.0 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72515 4.0 C 237.8 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 72515 5.0 N 273.8 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 72300 0.0 14.0 17.4 8.2 37.4 8.2 56.0 2.0 64.4 -0.8 72.4 -0.8 78.4 2.0 238.4 2.0 274.4 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 72300 1.0 D 17.4 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72300 2.0 D 37.4 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 72300 3.0 N 56.0 NVALUE 0.100 �iEGMENT 72300 4.0 C 78.4 VALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 72300 5.0 N 238.4 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72300 6.0 N 274.4 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 72230 0.0 14.0 17.4 8.2 37.4 8.2 ENbTABLE 78.4 2.0 292.0 2.0 326.0 14.0 f SEGMENT 72230 1.0 D 17.4 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72230 2.0 D 37.4 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 72230 3.0 N 56.0 ONVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72230 4.0 C 78.4 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 72230 5.0 N 292.0 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72230 6.0 N 326.0 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 72150 0.0 14.0 17.1 8.3 37.1 8.3 58.1 1.3 64.1 -0.7 72.1 -0.7 78.1 1.3 419.0 1.3 448.6 14.0 1 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$$ ALT: 3 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ FNDTABLE SEGMENT 72150 1.0 D 17.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72150 2.0 D 37.1 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 72150 3.0 N 58.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72150 4.0 C 78.1 NVALUE 0.040 • SEGMENT 72150 5.0 N 419.0 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72150 6.0 N 448.6 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 72000 0.0 14.0 17.1 8.3 37.1 8.3 58.1 1.3 64.1 -0.7 72.1 -0.7 78.1 1.3 448.1 1.3 475.1 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 72000 1.0 D 17.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72000 2.0 D 37.1 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 72000 3.0 N 58.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72000 4.0 C 78.1 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 72000 5.0 N 448.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 72000 6.0 N 475.1 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71850 0.0 14.0 17.1 8.3 37.1 8.3 58.1 1.3 64.1 -0.7 72.1 -0.7 78.1 1.3 358.1 1.3 406.1 14.0 NDTABLE SEGMENT 71850 1.0 D 17.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71850 2.0 D 37.1 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 71850 3.0 N 58.1 NVALUE 0.100 RFGMFNT 71R50 d 0 f. 7R 1 i SEGMENT 71850 \ .: N 358.1 NVALUE 0.100 1 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$# ALT: 4 �- -----------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT 71850 6.0 N 406.1 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71750 0.0 14.0 17.1 8.3 37.1 8.3 58.1 1.3 64.1 -0.7 72.1 -0.7 78.1 1.3 256.2 1.3 308.2 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 71750 1.0 D 17.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71750 2.0 D 37.1 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 71750 3.0 N 58.1 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71750 4.0 C 78.1 r NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 71750 5.0 N 256.2 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71750 6.0 N 308.2 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71643 0.0 14.0 16.8 8.4 36.8 8.4 57.8 1.4 63.8 -0.6 71.8 -0.6 77.8 1.4 210.8 1.4 250.8 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 71643 1.0 D 16.8 .IVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71643 2.0 D 36.8 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 71643 3.0 N 57.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71643 4.0 C 77.8 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 71643 5.0 N 210.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71643 6.0 N 250.8 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71500 0.0 14.0 16.8 8.4 36.8 8.4 57.8 1.4 63.8 -0.6 71.8 -0.6 77.8 1.4 263.8 1.4 293.8 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 71500 1.0 D 16.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71500 2.0 D 36.8 NVALUE 0.050 1 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 5 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ •!EGMENT 71500 3.0 N 57.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71500 4.0 C 77.8 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 71500 5.0 N 263.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71500 6.0 N 293.8 NVALUE 0.100 0.0 14.0 16.8 8.4 36.`6 8.4 51.8 1.4 63.8 -0.6 71.8 -0.6 77.8 1.4 397.8 1.4 429.8 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 71385 1.0 D 16.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71385 2.0 D 36.8 VALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 71385 3.0 N 57.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71385 4.0 C 77.8 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 71385 5.0 N 397.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71385 6.0 N 429.8 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71250 0.0 14.0 16.8 8.4 36.8 8.4 57.8 1.4 63.8 -0.6 71.8 -0.6 77.8 1.4 457.8 1.4 489.8 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 71250 1.0 D 16.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71250 2.0 D 36.8 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 71250 3.0 N 57.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71250 4.0 C 77.8 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 71250 5.0 N 457.8 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71250 6.0 N 489.8 •iVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71150 0.0 14.0 16.5 8.5 36.5 8.5 57.5 1.5 63.5 -0.5 71.5 -0.5 1 WSP2 XEG 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN 000NNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 6 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 77.5 1.5 455.5 1.5 487.5 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 71150 1.0 D 16.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71150 2.0 D 36.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 71150 3.0 N 57.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71150 4.0 C 77.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 71150 5.0 N 455.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71150 6.0 N 487.5 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 71050 0.0 14.0 16.5 8.5 36.5 8.5 57.5 1.5 63.5 -0.5 71.5 -0.5 77.5 1.5 352.5 1.5 384.5 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 71050 1.0 D 16.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71050 2.0 D 36.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 71050 3.0 N 57.5 SEGMENT 71050 4.0 C 77.5 NVALUE 0.'040 SEGMENT 71050 5.0 N 352.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 71050 6.0 N 384.5 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 10900 0.0 14.0 16.5 8.5 36.5 8.5 57.5 1.5 63.5 -0.5 71.5 -0.5 77.5 1.5 249.5 1.5 280.5 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70900 1.0 D 16.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 70900 2.0 D 36.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70900 3.0 N 57.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 70900 4.0 C 77.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70900 5.0 N 249.5 1 WSP2 XEG 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN 000NNECTING CHANNEL DESIGNO ALT: 7 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 70900 6.0 N 280.5 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 70800 0.0 14.0 16.5 8.5 36.5 8.5 57.5 1.5 63.5 -0.5 71.5 -0.5 77.5 1.5 184.5 1.5 216.5 14.0 SNDTABLE EGMENT 70800 1.0 D 16.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 70800 2.0 D 36.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70800 3.0 N 57.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 70800 4.0 C 77.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70800 5.0 N 184.5 NVALUE 0.035 SEGMENT 70800 6.0 N 216.5 NVALUE 0.100 SECTION 70735 0.0 14.0 16.2 8.6 34.5 8.5 55.5 1.6 61.5 -0.4 69.5 -0.4 75.5 1.6 115.5 1.6 152.7 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70735 1.0 D 16.2 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 70735 2.0 D 34.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70735 3.0 N 55.5 NVALUE 0.100 SEGMENT 70735 4.0 C 75.5 (VALUE 0.030 EGMENT 70735 5.0 N 115.5 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 70735 6.0 N 152.7 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION 70655 0.0 14.0 16.2 8.6 34.5 8.5 55.5 1.6 61.5 -0.4 69.5 -0.4 { ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70655 1.0 D 16.2 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70655 2.0 D 34.5 1 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN *$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$ ALT: 8 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ MVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70655 3.0 N 55.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70655 4.0 C 75.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70655 5.0 N 115.5 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 70655 6.0 N 152.7 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION 70440 0.0 14.0 16.2 8.6 34.5 8.6 55.5 1.6 61.5 -0.4 69.5 -0.4 75.5 1.6 115.5 1.6 152.7 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70440 1.0 D 16.2 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70440 2.0 D 34.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70440 3.0 N 55.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70440 4.0 C 75.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70440 5.0 N 115.5 .'VALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 70440 6.0 N 152.7 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION 70406 0.0 14.0 16.5 8.6 34.5 8.5 55.5 1.6 61.5 -0.4 69.5 -0.4 75.5 1.6 115.5 1.6 152.7 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70406 1.0 D 16.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70406 2.0 D 34.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70406 3.0 N 55.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70406 4.0 C 75.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70406 5.0 N 115.5 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 70406 6.0 N 152.7 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION OAKSDL -10.0 19.00 0.00 19.00 18.0 8.6 1 WSP2 XEO 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN## ALT: 9 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 36.0 8.6 54.0 -0.54 62.0 -0.54 68.0 1.8 118.0 1.8 158.0 19.0 168.0 19.1 ENDTABLE BPR OAKSDL 8 1. 7. PTFP i F 35 4A Z5 0.0 19.0 0.0 16.5 158.0 16.5 158.0 19.0 ENDTABLE SECTION 70375 0.0 14.0 16.2 8.6 34.5 8.6 55.5 1.6 11.5 -0.4 69.5 -0.4 75.5 1.6 115.5 1.6 152.1 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70375 1.0 D 16.2 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70375 2.0 D 34.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70375 3.0 N 55.5 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70375 4.0 C 75.5 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70375 5.0 N 115.5 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 70375 6.0 N 152.7 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION 70076 0.0 14.0 15.9 8.7 33.9 8.7 54.9 1.7 60.9 -0.3 68.9 -0.3 74.9 1.7 114.9 1.7 151.8 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 70076 1.0 D 15.9 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70076 2.0 D 33.9 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70076 3.0 N 54.9 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 70076 4.0 C 74.9 .IVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 70076 5.0 N 114.9 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 70076 6.0 N 151.8 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION 69746 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN ##CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$ ALT: 10 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 0.0 14.0 15.9 8.7 33.9 8.7 54.9 1.7 60.9 -0.3 68.9 -0.3 74.9 1.7 114.9 1.7 151.8 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 69746 1.0 D 15.9 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 69746 2.0 D 33.9 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 69746 3.0 N 54.9 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 69746 4.0 C 74.9 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 69746 5.0 N 114.9 NVALUE 0.025 ,EGMENT 69746 6.0 N 151.8 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION SEVEN -1.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 13.0 8.7 25.0 8.7' 33.0 6.0 52.0 -0.3 60.0 -0.3 66.0 1.74 106.0 1.74 125.0 8.0 133.0 19.0 135.0 20.0 FNnTARI F PIER 3.76 1.50 1.76 1.50 GIRDER 18.0 16.50 0.0 0.80 2.7 0.0 20.0 0.0 17.0 133.0 16.0 133.0 19.0 ENDTABLE SECTION 69686 0.0 14.0 15.9 8.8 33.9 8.8 ` 42.9 5.8 60.9 -0.2 68.9 -0.2 74.9 1.8 114.9 1.8 150.8 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 69686 1.0 D 15.9 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 69686 2.0 D 33.9 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 69686 3.0 N 42.9 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 69686 4.0 C 74.9 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 69686 5.0 N 114.9 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 69686 6.0 N 150.8 NVALUE 0.050 1 WSP2 XEO 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- NS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN 000NNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$# ALT: 11 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SECTION 69495 0.0 14.0 15.3 8.9 33.3 8.9 y 1.9 63.3 -0.1 71.3 -0.1 77.3 1.9 117.3 1.9 153.6 14.0 ENDTABLE WEGMENT 69495 1.0 D 15.3 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 69495 2.0 D 33.3 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 69495 3.0 N 42.3 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 69495 4.0 C 77.3 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 69495 5.0 N 117.3 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 69495 6.0 N 153.6 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION 68368 0.0 14.0 15.0 9.0 33.0 9.0 54.0 2.0 60.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 74.0 2.0 114.0 2.0 150.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 68368 1.0 D 15.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 68368 2.0 D 33.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68368 3.0 N 54.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 68368 4.0 C 74.0 NVALUE 0.040 ,EGMENT 68368 5.0 N 114.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 68368 6.0 N 150.0 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION 68325 0.0 14.0 15.0 9.0 33.0 9.0 54.0 2.0 60.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 7d n 9 n 114 n 7 n 15n n 14 n SEGMENT 68325 1.0 D 15.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 68325 2.0 D 33.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68325 3.0 N 54.0 NVALUE 0.050 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN *$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$* ALT: 12 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT 68325 4.0 C 74.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68325 5.0 N 114.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 68325 6.0 N 150.0 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION 68247 0.0 14.0 15.0 9.0 33.0 9.0 54.0 2.0 60.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 74.0 2.0 114.0 2.0 150.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 68247 1.0 D 15.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 68247 2.0 D 33.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68247 3.0 N 54.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 68247 4.0 C 74.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68247 5.0 N 114.0 NVALUE 0.025 •SEGMENT 68247 6.0 N 150.0 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION 68148 0.0 14.0 14.7 9.1 32.7 9.1 53.7 2.1 59.7 0.1 67.7 0.1 73.7 2.1 113.7 2.1 149.4 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 68148 1.0 D 14.7 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 68148 2.0 D 32.7 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68148 3.0 N 53.7 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 68148 4.0 C 73.7 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68148 5.0 N 113.7 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 68148 6.0 N 149.4 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION 68115 0.0 14.0 14.7 9.1 32.7 9.1 53.7 2.1 59.7 0.1 67.7 0.1 73.7 2.1 103.7 2.1 139.4 14.0 ENDTABLE 1 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$$ ALT: 13 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT 68115 1.0 D 14.7 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 68115 2.0 D 32.7 NVALIIF 6.046 t NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 68115 4.0 C 73.7 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68115 5.0 N 103.7 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 68115 6.0 N 139.4 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION 68076 0.0 14.0 14.7 9.1 32.7 9.1 53.7 2.1 59.7 0.1 67.7 0.1 73.7 2.1 93.4 2.1 129.4 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 68076 1.0 D 14.7 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 68076 2.0 D 32.7 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68076 3.0 N 53.7 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 68076 4.0 C 73.7 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 68076 5.0 N 93.4 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 68076 6.0 N 129.4 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION GRADd 0.0 13.090 0.0 2.05 11.00 2.05 11.00 13.09 12.00 13.09 12.00 0.05 23.00 0.05 23.00 13.09 24.00 13.09 24.00 2.05 35.00 2.05 35.00 13.09 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.05 47.00 2.05 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.05 59.00 2.05 59.00 13.09 NOTABLE SEGMENT GRADd 1.0 N 59.0 13.09 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION GRADu 0.0 13.09 0.0 2.09 11.00 2.09 11.00 13.09 12.00 13.09 12.00 0.09 23.00 0.09 23.00 13.09 24.00 13.09 24.00 2.09 35.00 2.09 35.00 13.09 1 WSP2 XEG 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN 000NNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN## ALT: 14 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.09 47.00 2.09 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.09 59.00 2.09 59.00 13.09 ENDTABLE SEGMENT GRADu 1.0 N 59.0 13.09 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION 67780 0.0 14.0 0.00 11.0 1.00 11.0 1.00 8.00 2.00 8.00 2.00 5.59 14.00 2.59 24.0 2.59 31.5 0.09 43.5 0.09 51.0 2.59 74.0 2.59 74.01 14.0 NDTABLE SEGMENT 67780 1.0 D 24.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 67780 2.0 C 74.00 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67780 3.0 N 74.01 NVALUE 0.012 QCPTTnM 11771 n 1.00 8.00 2.00 8.00 2.00 5.6� 14.00 2.60 24.0 2.60 31.5 0.10 43.5 0.10 51.0 2.60 74.0 2.60 74.01 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67710 1.0 D 24.0 ".NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 67710 2.0 C 74.00 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67710 3.0 N 74.01 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION I405d 0.0 13.09 0.0 2.12 11.00 2.12 11.00 13.09 12.00 13.09 12.00 0.12 23.00 0.12 23.00 13.09 24.00 13.09 24.00 2.12 35.00 2.12 35.00 13.09 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.12 47.00 2.12 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.12 59.00 2.12 59.00 13.09 ENDTABLE SEGMENT I405d 1.0 N 59.0 13.09 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION I405u 0.0 13.09 0.0 2.16 11.00 2.16 1 WSP2 XEO 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN ##CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 15 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 11.00 13.09 12.00 13.09 12.00 0.16 23.00 0.06 23.00 13.09 24.00 13.09 24.00 2.16 35.00 2.16 35.00 13.09 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.16 47.00 2.16 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.16 59.00 2.16 59.00 13.09 ENDTABLE SEGMENT I405u 1.0 N 59.0 13.09 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION 67448 0.0 14.0 0.00 11.0 1.00 11.0 1.00 8.00 2.00 8.00 2.00 5.60 14.00 2.66 24.0 2.66 31.5 0.16 43.5 0.16 51.0 2.66 74.0 2.66 74.01 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67448 1.0 D 24.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 67448 2.0 C 74.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67448 3.0 N 74.01 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION 67238 0.0 14.0 0.00 11.0 1.00 11.0 1.00 8.00 2.00 8.00 2.00 5.60 14.00 2.70 24.0 2.70 31.5 0.20 43.5 0.20 51.0 2.70 74.0 2.70 74.01 14.0 NDTABLE SEGMENT 67238 1.0 D 24.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT 67238 2.0 C 74.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67238 3.0 N 74.01 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION SW16d r 17.5 0.21 29.5 0.21 37.0 2.71 \ 60.0 2.71 60.01 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SW16d 1.0 C 0.01 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT SW16d 2.0 C 10.0 •4VALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16d 3.0 C 37.0 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL (------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN $$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN* ALT: 16 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT SW16d 4.0 C 60.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16d 5.0 C 60.01 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION SW16u 0.0 14.0 0.01 2.72 10.0 2.72 17.5 0.22 29.5 0.22 37.0 2.72 60.0 2.72 60.01 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SW16u 1.0 C 0.01 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT SW16u 2.0 C 10.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16u 3.0 C 37.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT SW16u 4.0 C 60.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16u 5.0 C 60.01 •.iVALUE 0.012 COMPUTE 72963 SW16u 72963 ------------------------------END OF DATA LISTING------------------------------ I COMPUTE 72963 SW16u 72963 ------------------------------STARTING DATA FROM GIVEN ELEVATION------------------------------ 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$$ ALT: 17 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72963 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -8.0 0.0 0.0 1 .0 1320.0 20.0 .00 .00 .00 .02 -8.0 .00000 165.0 2 1.0 1485.0 20.0 .00 .00 .00 .02 -8.0 .00000 165.0 3 2.0 1650.0 20.0 .00 .00 .00 .02 -8.0 .00000 165.0 • SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 72963 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I nTgrH4arF rFS 9n 1)n DISCHARGE CFS 20. 20. 0. VELOCITY FPS .01 .01 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 20. 0. VELOCITY FPS .01 .01 I ELEV .0 KD 210900. 210900. 2 ELEV 1.0 KD 254779. 254779. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 301504. 301504. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN* ALT: 18 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72890 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT #*$ MESSAGE REACH 72890 HAS A DAMAGE LENGTH BUT NO DAMAGE SEGMENT CHECK INPUT DATA #$#$ 0 -8.0 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .0 1448.0 20.0 .00 .33 .33 197.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL .0 1448.0 20.0 .00 .33 .33 197.0 *t*t*MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 .0 1448.0 20.0 .00 .33 .33 .02 -8.0 .00000 197.0 2 1.0 1646.7 20.0 .00 .33 .33 .02 -8.0 .00000 199.7 3 2.0 1847.8 20.0 .00 .33 .34 .02 -8.0 .00000 202.4 • SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 72890 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 N C N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 20. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .01 .00 .01 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 20. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .01 .00 .01 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 20. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .01 .00 .01 .00 1 ELEV .0 KD 229639. 1. 229637. 1. 2 ELEV 1.0 KD 284000. 10. 283986. 4. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 343001. 51, 342935. 14. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 19 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72700 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT ##$$$ MESSAGE REACH 72700 HAS A DAMAGE LENGTH BUT NO DAMAGE SEGMENT CHECK INPUT DATA $$ 0 -3.6 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .0 632.9 20.0 .00 .81 .81 186.6 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL ROTTOM***** ****,*MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 .0 632.9 20.0 .00 .81 .81 .02 -3.6 .00000 186.6 2 1.0 822.8 20.0 .00 .81 .84 .02 -3.6 .00000 192.6 3 2.0 1018.1 20.0 .00 .81 .87 .02 -3.6 .00000 198.6 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 72700 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 N C N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 20. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .03 .00 .03 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 20. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .02 .00 .02 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 20. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .02 .00 .02 .00 1 ELEV .0 KD 60432. 1. 60430. 1. 2 ELEV 1.0 KD 92968. 14. 92940. 14. 3 ELEV 2.0 KO 131040. 86. 130868. 86. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------) LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGNO ALT: 20 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72515 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT �i 0 -.8 0.0 0.0 1 .0 134.4 20.0 .00 .72 .72 .02 -.8 .00002 169.8 2 1.0 306.9 20.0 .00 .75 .75 .02 -.8 .00000 175.6 LOW GRND 2.0 485.5 20.0 .00 .77 .77 181.8 BANK FULL 2.0 485.5 20.0 .00 .77 .77 181.8 3 2.0 485.5 20.0 .00 .77 .77 .02 -.8 .00000 181.8 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 72515 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 D D N C N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .15 .00 .00 .00 .15 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .07 .00 .00 .00 .07 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .04 .00 .00 .00 .04 .00 1 ELEV .0 KD 4881, 1. 1. 1. 4877. 1. 2 ELEV 1.0 KD 18843. 1. 1. 1. 18839. 1. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 39565. 1. 1. 1. 39561. 1. WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN *$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGNO ALT: 21 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72300 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- Nn FIFV 4AFA 0 ------OCRFS FInnnFn------- RTOPTTNr CRTT FRTrTTnN FIN TAD DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.8 0.0 0.0 1 .3 12.4 20.0 .00 .07 .07 .02 -.3 .00223 13.8 2 1.1 24.1 20.0 .00 .09 .09 .02 -.3 .00035 17.6 LOW GRND 2.0 42.6 20.0 .00 .11 .11 22.4 �a BANK FULL 2.0 42.6 20.0 .00 .11 .11 22.4 3 2.0 44.8 20.0 .00 .11 .16 .02 -.3 .00007 32.2 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 72300 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.60 .00 .00 .00 1.61 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .83 .00 .00 .00 .83 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .46 .00 .00 .00 .46 .05 .00 1 ELEV .3 KD 424. 1. 1. 1. 419. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 1.1 KD 1075. 1. 1. 1. 1070. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 2381. 1. 1. 1. 2376. 1. 1. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN $$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$* ALT: �r 22 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72230 DA: 1288.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.8 0.0 0.0 1 .5 14.2 20.0 .00 .02 .02 .02 -.3 .00153 14.5 2 1.1 24.5 20.0 .00 .03 .03 .02 -.3 .00033 17.8 LOW GRND 2.0 42.6 20.0 .00 .04 .04 22.4 BANK FULL 2.0 42.6 20.0 .00 .04 .04 22.4 3 2.0 46.6 20.0 .00 .04 .07 .02 -.3 .00007 40.7 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 72230 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.40 .00 .00 .00 1.41 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .81 .00 .00 .00 .81 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .46 .00 .00 .00 .46 .04 .00 1 ELEV .5 KD 511. 1. 1. 1. 506. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 1.1 KD 1102. 1. 1. 1. 1097. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 2392. 1. 1. 1. 2386. 2. 1. * $#$ MESSAGE DAMAGE LENGTH GREATER THAN FLOODPLAIN LENGTH FOR REACH 72150 *#$ 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGF RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72150 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP J FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.7 0.0 0.0 1 .6 16.3 20.0 .00 .06 .06 .02 -.2 .00110 16.1 2 1.2 25.4 20.0 .00 .07 .07 .02 -.2 .00032 19.2 LOW GRND 1.3 28.0 20.0 .00 .08 .08 20.0 BANK FULL 1.3 28,.0 20.0 .00 .08 .08 20.0 3 2.0 290.1 20.0 .00 .08 .67 .02 -.2 .00001 364.7 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 72150 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•---------- 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.22 .00 .00 .00 1.22 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .79 .00 .00 .00 .79 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 7. 13. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .12 .00 .00 .04 .17 .05 .04 1 ELEV .6 KD 604. 1. 1. 1. 597. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 1.2 KD 1113. 1. 1. 1. 1106. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 6295. 1. 1. 9. 2539. 3736. 8. * $ MESSAGE DAMAGE LENGTH GREATER THAN FLOODPLAIN LENGTH FOR REACH 72000 $ 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL c------- WS ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN* ALT: 24 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 72000 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: ,00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.7 0.0 0.0 1 .8 18.5 20.0 .00 .06 .06 .02 -.2 .00078 16.9 2 1.2 26.3 20.0 .00 .07 .07 .02 -.2 .00029 19.5 LOW GRND 1.3 28.0 20.0 .00 .07 .07 20.0 BANK FULL 1.3 28.0 20.0 .00 .07 .07 20.0 3 2.0 311.7 20.0 .00 .07 1.36 .02 -.2 .00001 393.7 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 72000 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.08 .00 .00 .00 1.08 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. n uFi nrTTY FOS 7� 06 nn nn 7F, on 00 t 0. VELOCITY FPS .15 .00 .00 .03 .20 .04 .03 1 ELEV .8 KD 718, 1. 1. 1. 712. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 1.2 KD 1169. 1. 1. 1. 1164. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 5422. 1. 1. 7. 2543. 2865. 6. 1 WSP2 XEO 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN $*CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 25 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71850 DA: 1288.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA A ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.7 0.0 0.0 1 .9 20.0 20.0 .00' .06 .06 .02 -.2 .00058 17.4 2 1.2 27.0 20.0 .00 .06 .07 .02 -.2 .00026 19.7 LOW GRND 1.3 28.0 20.0 .00 .07 .07 20.0 BANK FULL 1.3 28.0 20.0 .00 .07 .07 20.0 3 2.0 247.8 20.0 .00 .07 1.05 .02 -.2 .00002 304.9 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 71850 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .96 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .72 .00 .00 .00 .74 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 10. 10. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .18 .00 .00 .05 .23 .05 .05 1 ELEV .9 KD 832. 7. 7. 7. 797, 7. 7. 2 ELEV 1.2 KD 1251. 8. 8. 8. 1212. B. 8. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 4694. 11. 11. 12. 2547. 2100. 13, 1 WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN $$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$ ALT: ____ 26 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71750 DA: 1288.0 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA O ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.7 0.0 0.0 1 .9 20.9 20.0 .00 .04 .04 .02 -.2 .00051 17.7 2 1.3 27.5 20.0 .00 .04 .04 .02 -.2 .00024 19.8 LOW GRND 1.3 28.0 20.0 .00 .04 .04 20.0 BANK FULL 1.3 28.0 20.0 .00 .04 .04 20.0 3 2.0 174.3 20.0 .00 .04 .43 .02 -.2 .00002 203.3 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 71750 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0. VELOCITY FPS .92 .00 .00 .00 .96 .00 .00 2� DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .71 .00 .00 .00 .73 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 12. 8. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .24 .00 .00 .06 .28 .06 .05 1 ELEV .9 KD 885. 7. 7. 7. 850. 7. 7. 2 ELEV 1.3 KD 1280. 8. 8. 8. 1240. 8. B. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 3977. 11. 11. 12. 2551. 1379, 14. 1 WSP2 XE9 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 27 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71643 DA: 1288.0 SO MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA 9 ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT S9 FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.6 0.0 0.0 1 1.0 20.3 20.0 .00 .04 .04 .02 -.1 .00056 17.5 2 1.3 26.2 20.0 .00 .05 .05 .02 -.1 .00028 19.4 LOW GRND 1.4 28.0 20.0 .00 .05 .05 20.0 BANK FULL 1.4 28.0 20.0 .00 .05 .05 20.0 3 2.0 126.0 20.0 .00 .05 .39 .02 -.1 .00004 156.9 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 71643 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .95 .00 .00 .00 .99 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .74 .00 .00 .00 .76 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 14. 6. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .31 .00 .00 .09 .34 .07 .09 1 ELEV 1.0 KD 849. 7. 7. 7. 814. 7. 7. 2 ELEV 1.3 KD 1194. 8. 8. B. 1156. 8. 8. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 3194. 10. 10, 11. 2361. 789. 12. 1 WSP2 XE9 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: �__ 28 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71500 DA: 1288.0 S9 MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA 9 ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT S9 FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.6 0.0 0.0 1 1.1 21.7 20.0 .00 .06 .06 .02 -.1 .00046 18.0 2 1.3 26.9 20.0 .00 .06 .06 .02 -.1 .00026 19.6 LOW GRND 1.4 28.0 20.0 .00 .06 .07 20.0 BANK FULL 1.4 28.0 20.0 .00 .06 .07 20.0 3 2.0 160.2 20.0 .00 .06 .69 .02 -.1 .00003 209.4 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 71500 .CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .89 .00 .00 .00 .92 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .72 .00 .00 .00 .74 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 12. 7. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .26 .00 .00 .08 .31 .06 .09 1 ELEV 1.1 KD 929. 7. 7. 7. 893. 7. 7. 2 ELEV 1.3 KD 1242. 8. 8. 8. 1202. 8. 8. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 3539. 10. 10. 11. 2369. 1127. 10. i WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGNO ALT: 29 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71385 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NC. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.6 0.0 0.0 1 1.1 22.2 20.0 .00 .03 .05 .02 -.1 .00044 18.2 2 1.4 27.2 20.0 .00 .03 .05 .02 -.1 .00025 19.7 LOW GRND 1.4 28.0 20.0 .00 .03 .05 20.0 BANK FULL 1.4 28.0 20.0 .00 .03 .05 20.0 3 2.0 246.0 20.0 .00 .03 .91 .02 -.1 .00003 343.5 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 71385 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20, 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .87 .00 .00 .00 .90 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .71 .00 .00 .00 .74 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20, 0. 0. 0. 11. 9. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .23 .00 .00 .07 .28 .04 .08 1 ELEV 1.1 KD 958. 7. 7. 7. 922. 7. 7. 2 ELEV 1.4 KD 1261. 8. 8. 8. 1221, B. 8. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 3836. 10. 10. 10. 2373. 1422. 10. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN ##CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 30 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71250 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.6 0.0 0.0 1 1.1 22.9 20.0 .00 .03 .06 .02 -.1 .00040 18.4 2 1.4 27.5 20.0 .00 .03 .06 .02 -.1 .00024 19.9 LOW GRND 1.4 28.0 20.0 .00 .03 .06 20.0 BANK FULL 1.4 28.0 20.0 .00 .03 .06 20.0 3 2.0 285.0 20.0 .00 .03 1.25 .02 -.1 .00002 403.5 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 71250 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ---I-------------------------------------------0-------------0-------------0--------------------------0--------------------- ' 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. Z0. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .85 .00 .00 .00 .88 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .70 .00 .00 .00 .73 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 10. 10. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .20 .00 .00 .06 .25 .04 .07 1 ELEV 1.1 KD 994. 7. 7. 7. 957. 7. 7. 2 ELEV 1.4 KD 1284. B. 8. 8. 1244. 8. 8. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 4168. 10. 10. 10. 2376. 1750. 10. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS ; PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN #$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 31. RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71150 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.5 0.0 0.0 1 1.1 21.3 20.0 .00 .02 .04 .02 .0 .00049 17.9 2 1.4 25.8 20.0 .00 .02 .04 .02 .0 .00029 19.3 LOW GRND 1.5 28.0 20.0 .00 .02 .05 20.0 BANK FULL 1.5 28.0 20.0 .00 .02 .05 20.0 3 2.0 243.9 20.0 .00 .02 .92 .02 .0 .00003 401.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 71150 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .90 .00 .00 .00 .94 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .75 .00 .00 .00 .77 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 12. 8. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .27 .00 .00 .11 .32 .04 .00 1 ELEV 1.1 KD 905. 7. 7. 7. 869. 7. 7. 2 ELEV 1.4 KD 1175. 8, 8. B. 1136. 8. 8. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 3323. 10. 10. 10. 2189. 1093. 10. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL (------- WS _W PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN $CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 32 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 71050 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 40 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.5 0.0 0.0 > 1 1) 91 4 n n nn 01 N m n nnne7 is 0 LOW GRND. 1.5 28.0 20.0 .00 .02 .05 20.0 BANK FULL 1.5 28.0 20.0 .00 .02 .05 20.0 3 2.0 188.6 20.0 .00 .02 .68 .02 .0 .00004 298.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 71050 �) SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .89 .00 .00 .00 .93 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .75 .00 .00 .00 .77 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 14. 6. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .31 .00 .00 .12 .36 .04 .00 1 ELEV 1.2 KD 923. 7. 7. 7. 887. 7. 7. 2 ELEV 1.4 KD 1187. 8. 8. 8. 1148. B. 8. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 3007. 10. 10. 10. 2191. 776. 10. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN #$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 33 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70900 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.5 0.0 0.0 1 1.2 23.0 20.0 .00 .06 .06 .02 .0 .00042 18.4 2 1.4 26.9 20.0 .00 .07 .07 .02 .0 .00027 19.6 LOW GRND 1.5 28.0 20.0 .00 .07 .07 20.0 BANK FULL 1.5 28.0 20.0 .00 .07 .07 20.0 3 2.0 133.6 20.0 .00 .07 .67 .02 .0 .00002 195.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 70900 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .87 .00 .00 .00 .87 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .74 .00 .00 .00 .74 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 9. 11. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .19 .00 .00 .04 .22 .12 .00 1 ELEV 1.2 KD 971. 1. 1. 1. 966. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 1.4 KD 1206. 1. 1. 1. 1201. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 4575. 1. 1. 4. 2197. 2367. 4. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE • REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN 000NNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 34 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70800 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ---------------------- -------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT US F1000PI_ATN TOTAI CSM FI_EV SLOPF WTDTH 0 -.5 0.0 0.0 1 1.3 23.8 20.0 .00 .04 .04 .02 .0 .00039 18.7 2 1.5 27.4 20.0 .00 .05 .05 .02 .0 .00026 19.8 LOW GRND 1.5 28.0 20.0 .00 .05 .05 20.0 BANK FULL 1.5 28.0 20.0 .00 .05 .05 20.0 3 2.0 98.5 20.0 .00 .05 .30 .02 .0 .00003 130.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 70800 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .84 .00 .00 .00 .84 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .73 .00 .00 .00 .73 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 11. 9. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .25 .00 .00 .05 .28 .16 .00 1 ELEV 1.3 KD 1018. 1. 1. 1. 1013. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 1.5 KD 1240. 1. 1. 1. 1235. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 3695. 1. 1. 4. 2202. 1482. 4. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$$ ALT: 35 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70735 DA: 1288.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.4 0.0 0.0 1 1.3 22.2 20.0 .00 .03 .03 .02 .1 .00026 18.2 2 1.5 25.7 20.0 .00 .03 .03 .02 .1 .00018 19.3 LOW GRND 1.6 28.0 20.0 .00 .03 .03 20.0 BANK FULL 1.6 28.0 20.0 .00 .03 .03 20.0 3 2.0 55.6 20.0 .00 .03 .09 .02 .1 .00004 62.7 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 70735 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .90 .00 .00 .00 .90 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .78 .00 .00 .00 .78 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 16. 4. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .41 .00 .00 .00 .43 .22 .00 i ELEV 1.3 KD 1234. 1. 1. 1. 1229, 1. 1. 2 ELEV 1.5 KD 1508. 1. 1. 1. 1503. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.0 KD 3295. 1. 1. 3. 2696. 591. 3. i WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$* ALT: 36 R4TTNG TARIF Fno CFrTTnu 7u;; na- iryaa n cn MT rvo rncc- nn rnuT rnrc- nn NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.4 0.0 0.0 1 1.3 22.9 20.0 .00 .03 .03 .02 .1 .00043 18.4 2 1.5 26.2 20.0 .00 .04 .04 .02 .1 .00030 19.4 LOW GRND 1.6 28.0 20.0 .00 .04 .04 20.0 BANK FULL 1.6 28.0 20.0 .00 .04 .04 20.0 3 2.1 55.9 20.0 .00 .04 .12 .02 .1 .00006 62.7 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 70655 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .87 .00 .00 .00 .87 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .76 .00 .00 .00 .76 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 15. 5. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .38 .00 .00 .00 .41 .28 .00 1 ELEV 1.3 KD 966. 1. 1. 1. 961. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 1.5 KD 1162. 1. 1. 1. 1157. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.1 KD 2637. 1. 1. 3. 2030. 599. 3. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN $$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 37 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70440 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.4 0.0 0.0 1 1.4 24.6 19.6 .00 .09 .09 .02 .1 .00034 18.9 2 1.6 27.3 19.6 .00 .10 .10 .02 .1 .00025 19.8 LOW GRND 1.6 28.0 19.6 .00 .10 .10 20.0 BANK FULL 1.6 28.0 19.6 .00 .10 .10 20.0 3 2.1 56.6 19.6 .00 .10 .31 .02 .1 .00005 62.8 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 70440 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .80 .00 .00 .00 .80 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. • 0. VELOCITY FPS .71 .00 .00 .00 .72 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 15. 5. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .37 .00 .00 .00 .39 .27 .00 1 ELEV 1.4 KD 1064. 1. 1. 1. 1059. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 1.6 KD 1236. 1. 1. 1. 1231. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.1 KD 2678. 1. 1. 3. 2051. 619. 3. 1 WSP2 XFQ 03/25/93 16-06-42 FSPR -------> IOW FIOW CHANNFI <------- We ogr,F RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70406 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.4 0.0 0.0 1 1.4 24.8 19.6 .00 .02 .02 .02 .1 .00033 19.0 2 1.6 27.5 19.6 .00 .02 .02 .02 .1 .00025 19.8 LOW GRND 1.6 28.0 19.6 .00 .02 .02 20.0 BANK FULL 1.6 28.0 19.6 .00 .02 .02 20.0 3 2.1 56.7 19.6 .00 .02 .05 .02 .1 .00005 62.8 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 70406 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .79 .00 .00 .00 .79 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .71 .00 .00 .00 .71 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 15. 5. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .37 .00 .00 .00 .39 .27 .00 1 ELEV 1.4 KD 1078. 1. 1. 1. 1073. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 1.6 KD 1246. 1. 1. 1. 1241. 1. 1. i 3 ELEV 2.1 KD 2685. 1. 1. 3. 2054. 622. 3. 1 TABLE OF VALUES FOR BPR EQUATION IF AN # SYMBOL APPEARS BESIDE A VARIABLE IN THIS TABLE,IT IS EXTRAPOLATED FROM FIGURES 6,7,10, OR 34 OF THE BPR MANUAL. NO. M AKB DLTAK SIGMA DKS COEFK VN2 ALPHA ALPHA2 ALPHA3 AEXIT APPAR DCRIT CRIT FPS SQ FT SQ FT FT COEF 1 NO HEAD LOSS FROM BPR PROCEDURE (M > 0.98 AND PIER AREA RATIO < 0.01) 2 .95 .03 .00 .00 .00 .03 .72 1.13 1.12 1.13 35.40 36.61 -.01 .00 3 1.00 .00 .05 1.00 .00 .05 .39 1.04 1.04 1.17 65.86 67.13 -.01 .00 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : �r PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN $*CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$$ ALT: 398 ROAD SECTION OAKSDL ------------------- STARTING BRIDGE BRIDGE CULVERT CULVERT WEIR WEIR WEIR NO. HW CFS HL TW CSM CFS AREA CFS AREA CFS AREA TOP WIDTH FT FT FT SQ FT SQ FT SQ FT FT 0 -.54 0.0 0.00 -.54 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1.44 19.6 .00 1.44 .02 ----- 24.8 ----- .0 ----- .0 .0 2 1.60 19.6 .02 1.58 .02 19.6 27.2 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 3 2.09 19.6 .02 2.07 .02 19.6 49.7 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 MIN ROAD ELEVATION : 19.00 FT RRTDPF TYPF : RPR GTRDFR RDTTDM FIFVATTDN : 19 00 FT OPFNTNP N0 : 1 t I .-WSP2 XEA 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN* ALT: 40 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70375 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- 1 NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.4 0.0 0.0 1 1.5 25.2 19.6 .00 .03 .03 .02 .1 .00032 19.1 LOW GRND 1.6 28.0 19.6 .00 .03 .03 20.0 BANK FULL 1.6 28.0 19.6 .00 .03 .03 20.0 2 1.6 28.4 19.6 .00 .03 .04 .02 .1 .00023 21.4 3 2.1 58.2 19.6 .00 .03 .10 .02 .1 .00005 62.9 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 70375 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .78 .00 .00 .00 .78 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .69 .00 .00 .00 .70 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 14. S. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .36 .00 .00 .00 .38 .27 .00 �.; 1 ELEV 1.5 KD 1101. 1. 1. 1. 1096. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 1.6 KO 1290. 1. 1. 1. 1284. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.1 KD 2767. 1. 1. 4. 2096. 663. 4. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN $*CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 41 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 70076 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.3 0.0 0.0 1 1.5 25.0 19.6 .00 .12 .12 .02 .2 .00032 19.1 2 1.7 27.6 19.6 .00 .12 .12 .02 .2 .00024 19,9 LOW GRND 1.7 28.0 19.6 .00 .12 .12 20.0 BANK FULL 1.7 28.0 19.6 .00 .12 .12 20.0 3 2.1 52.9 19.6 .00 .12 .39 .02 .2 .00006 62.4 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 70076 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .78 .00 .00 .00 .78 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .71 .00 .00 .00 .71 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 15, 4. 0. t I ELEV 1.5 KD 1091. 1. 1. 1. 1086. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 1.7 KO 1256. 1. 1. 1. 1251. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.1 KD 2481. 1. 1. 2. 1949. 525. 2. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN $$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN* ALT: 42 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 69746 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- N0. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.3 0.0 0.0 1 1.6 26.8 19.6 .00 .15 .15 .02 .2 .00027 19.6 LOW GRND 1.7 28.0 19.6 .00 .15 .15 20.0 BANK FULL 1.7 28.0 19.6 .00 .15 .15 20.0 2 1.8 31.7 19.6 .00 .15 .25 .02 .2 .00019 32.6 3 2.1 54.2 19.6 .00 .15 .47 .02 .2 .00006 62.6 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 69746 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .73 .00 .00 .00 .73 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 19. 1. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .64 .00 .00 .00 .65 .28 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 15. 5. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .39 .00 .00 .00 .41 .27 .00 i ELEV 1.6 KD 1201. 1. 1. 1. 1196. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 1.8 KD 1377. 1. 1. 1. 1368, 5, 1. 3 ELEV 2.1 KD 2549. 1. 1. 3. 1984. 557. 3. 1 TABLE OF VALUES FOR BPR EQUATION IF AN SYMBOL APPEARS BESIDE A VARIABLE IN THIS TABLE,IT IS EXTRAPOLATED FROM FIGURES 6,7,10, OR 34 OF THE BPR MANUAL. NO. M AKB DLTAK SIGMA DKS COEFK VN2 ALPHA ALPHA2 ALPHA3 AEXIT APPAR DCRIT CRIT FPS SQ FT SQ FT FT COEF 1 NO HEAD LOSS FROM BPR PROCEDURE (M > 0.98 AND PIER AREA RATIO < 0.01) 2 NO HEAD LOSS FROM BPR PROCEDURE (M > 0.98 AND PIER AREA RATIO < 0.01) 3 1.00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .37 1.03 1.03 1.15 54.31 55.77 .22 .00 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/25/93 16:06:42 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 438 ROAD SECTION SEVEN ------------------- STARTING BRIDGE BRIDGE CULVERT CULVERT WEIR WEIR WEIR NO. HW CFS HL TW CSM CFS AREA CFS AREA CFS AREA TOP WIDTH FT FT FT SQ FT SQ FT SQ FT FT 0 -.30 0.0 0.00 -.30 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 1.64 19.6 .00 1.64 .02 ----- 26.8 ----- .0 ----- .0 .0 2 1.77 19.6 .00 1.77 .02 ----- 30.3 ----- .0 ----- .0 .0 7 17 1c 10 A M ? I n1) 10 A 5? 5 n n n n n MIN ROAD ELEVATION : 19.00 FT BRIDGE TYPE : BPR GIRDER BOTTOM ELEVATION : 16.50 FT OPENING NO.: 1 �y 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 44 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 69686 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.2 0.0 0.0 1 1.7 25.2 19.6 .00 .03 .03 .02 .3 .00031 19.1 2 1.8 27.5 19.6 .00 .03 .03 .02 .3 .00025 19.8 LOW GRND 1.8 28.0 19.6 .00 .03 .03 20.0 BANK FULL 1.8 28.0 19.6 .00 .03 .03 20.0 3 2.2 49.6 19.6 .00 .03 .09 .02 .3 .00008 62.1 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 69686 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 ------D------------D------------N------------C------------N------------N----------- 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .78 .00 .00 .00 .78 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .71 .00 .00 .00 .71 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 15. 4. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .43 .00 .00 .00 .43 .32 .00 1 ELEV 1.7 KD 1103. 1. 1. 1. 1098. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 1.8 KD 1246. 1. 1. 1. 1241. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.2 KD 2111. 1. 1. 1. 1798. 306. 3. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS w_ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 45 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 69495 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- N0. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 -.1 0.0 0.0 1 1.9 30.9 19.6 .00 .63 .63 .02 .4 .00020 23.0 LOW GRND 1.9 31.0 19.6 .00 .63 .63 23.0 BANK FULL 1.9 31.0 19.6 .00 .63 .63 23.0 2 2.0 35.5 19.6 .00 .63 1.03 .02 .4 .00016 37.6 3 2.2 52.5 19.6 .00 .63 1.78 .02 .4 .00007 65.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 69495 ecc mn D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 20. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .63 .00 .00 .00 .63 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 19. 1. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .57 .00 .00 .00 .58 .26 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 16. 3. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .40 .00 .00 .00 .42 .24 .00 1 ELEV 1.9 KD 1382. 1. 1. 1. 1377. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 2.0 KD 1516. 1. 1. 1. 1505. 6. 1. 3 ELEV 2.2 KD 2370. 1. 1. 2. 2003. 360. 2. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN## ALT: ____ 46 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68368 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .0 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.0 28.0 16.3 .00 .52 .52 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM um BANK FULL 2.0 28.0 16.3 .00 .52 .52 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 2.1 33.6 19.6 .00 .52 1.01 .02 .5 .00017 39.1 2 2.1 36.5 19.6 .00 .52 1.26 .02 .5 .00015 48.9 3 2.3 48.2 19.6 .00 .52 1.60 .02 .5 .00008 62.0 i SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 68368 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 19. 1. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .61 .00 .00 .00 .62 .27 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 18. 1. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .57 .00 .00 .00 .59 .25 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 16. 3. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .44 .00 .00 .00 .46 .26 .00 1 ELEV 2.1 KD 1433. 1. 1. 1. 1417. 11. 1. 2 ELEV 2.1 KD 1535. 1. 1. 2. 1493. 37. 2. 3 ELEV 2.3 KD 2172. 1. 1. 2. 1815. 351. 2. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 47 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68325 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CDNT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .0 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.0 28.0 16.1 .00 .02 .02 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM*t*** BANK FULL 2.0 28.0 16.1 .00 .02 .02 20.0 *****MFggUF- FI FV RFI nW FTPRT PRnFTI F FI nW TNTFPPnt OTM 1 TNP801 V FPnM PH8WI PnTTnMtt*** .� 2 2.1 36.9 19.6 .00 .02 .05 .02 .5 .00015 50.2 3 2.3 48.4 19.6 .00 .02 .06 .02 .5 .00008 62.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 68325 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 19. 1. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .61 .00 .00 .00 .62 .26 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 18. 1. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .57 .00 .00 .00 .59 .24 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 16. 4. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .44 .00 .00 .00 .46 .26 .00 1 ELEV 2.1 KD 1447. 1. 1. 1. 1429. 14. 1. 2 ELEV 2.1 KD 1552. 1. 1. 2. 1503. 44. 2. 3 ELEV 2.3 KD 2185. 1. 1. 2. 1821. 358. 2. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN $CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 48 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68247 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .0 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.0 28.0 15.7 .00 .04 .04 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 2.0 28.0 15.7 .00 .04 .04 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 2.1 34.9 19.6 .00 .04 .08 .02 .5 .00016 43.4 2 2.2 37.6 19.6 .00 .04 .09 .02 .5 .00014 52.5 3 2.3 48.8 19.6 .00 .04 .11 .02 .5 .00008 62.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 68247 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 18. 1. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .60 .00 .00 .00 .61 .26 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 18. 2. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .56 .00 .00 .00 .58 .24 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20, 0. 0. 0. 16. 4. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .43 .00 .00 .00 .46 .26 .00 1 ELEV 2.1 KD 1474. 1. 1. 1. 1450. 19. 1. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 1585. 1. 1. 2. 1522. 58. 2. 3 ELEV 2.3 KD 2208. 1. 1. 2. 1831. 370. 2. WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN $*CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 49 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68148 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- Nn Ff FU APFA 0 ------Arf7FS FI nnf)pf)------- STARTTMC roTT GQTPTTnN FI MW Tito DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT tT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.1 28.0 18.2 .00 .05 .05 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 2.1 28.0 18.2 .00 .05 .05 20.0 ****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 2.1 30.0 19.6 .00 .05 .06 .02 .6 .00021 27.0 2 2.2 32.6 19.6 .00 .05 .08 .02 .6 .00018 35.6 3 2.4 43.2 19.6 .00 .05 .14 .02 .6 .00010 61.5 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 68148 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 19. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .66 .00 .00 .00 .67 .30 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 19. 1. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .63 .00 .00 .00 .63 .28 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 17. 3. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .49 .00 .00 .00 .52 .25 .00 1 ELEV 2.1 KD 1332. 1. 1. 1. 1325. 2. 1. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 1402. 1. 1. 1. 1390. 7. 1. 3 ELEV 2.4 KD 1901. 1. 1. 2. 1676. 220. 2. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 50 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68115 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= '.00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.1 28.0 18.2 .00 .02 .02 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 2.1 28.0 18.2 .00 .02 .02 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 2.1 30.1 19.6 .00 .02 .02 .02 .6 .00021 26.3 2 2.2 32.1 19.6 .00 .02 .02 .02 .6 .00018 32.7 3 2.4 40.9 19.6 .00 .02 .04 .02 .6 .00011 51.5 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 68115 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 19, 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .66 .00 .00 .00 .67 .30 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 19. 1. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .63 .00 .00 .00 .64 .28 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 18. 2: 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .51 .00 .00 .00 .53 .26 .00 1 ELEV 2.1 KD 1343. 1. 1. 1. 1336. 3. 1. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 1411. 1. 1. 1. 1399. 7. 1. 3 FI_FV ?.4 KO 1855. 1. 1 ?. 16R1 . 168 ? REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONN-CTT_MG CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 68076 DA: 1260.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.1 28.0 18.3 .00 .02 .02 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** BANK FULL 2.1 28.0 18.3 .00 .02 .02 20.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 2.1 30.0 19.6 .00 .02 .02 .02 .6 .00020 25.1 2 2.2 31.6 19.6 .00 .02 .03 .02 .6 .00018 29.3 3 2.4 38.5 19.6 .00 .02 .04 .02 .6 .00012 41.3 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 68076 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 D D N C N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 19. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .66 .00 .00 .00 .67 .30 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 19. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .64 .00 .00 .00 .64 .28 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 20. 0. 0. 0. 18. 1. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .53 .00 .00 .00 .55 .28 .00 1 ELEV 2.1 KO 1356. 1. 1. 1. 1348. 3. 1. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 1422. 1. 1. 1. 1410. 7. 1. 3 ELEV 2.4 KD 1807. 1. 1. 2. 1688. 113. 2. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 52 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION GRADd DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT ***** MESSAGE REACH GRADd HAS A DAMAGE LENGTH BUT NO DAMAGE SEGMENT CHECK INPUT DATA ***** 0 .1 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .1 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 2.1 27.4 19.3 .00 .00 .02 .02 .5 .00003 21.8 2 2.2 29.6 19.3 .00 .00 .03 .02 .5 .00003 26.2 3 2.4 39.0 19.3 .00 .00 .05 .02 .5 .00002 45.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION GRADd SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ i MCHARPF US 19. 19_ i DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19. 0. VELOCITY FPS .72 .65 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19. 0. VELOCITY FPS .54 .49 1 ELEV 2.1 KD 3705. 3705. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 3782. 3782. !� 3 ELEV 2.4 KD 4112. 4112. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: - 53 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION GRADu DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT ***** MESSAGE REACH GRADu HAS A DAMAGE LENGTH BUT NO DAMAGE SEGMENT CHECK INPUT DATA *** * 0 .1 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .1 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 2.2 25.4 19.3 .00 .00 .08 .02 .5 .00003 17.8 2 2.2 27.6 19.3 .00 .00 .10 .02 .5 00003 22.3 3 2.4 37.0 19.3 .00 .00 .18 .02 .5 .00002 41.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION GRAOu 0. SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19. 0. VELOCITY FPS .80 .76 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19. 0. VELOCITY FPS .76 .70 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19. 0. VELOCITY FPS .58 .52 1 ELEV 2.2 KD 3636. 3636. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 3713. 3713. 3 ELEV 2.4 KD 4042. 4042. *****WARNING - SECT. 67780 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 2 AT ELEVATION 2.79 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE ***** I WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : _- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: __ 54 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67780 DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP • FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 1 2.2 37.8 19.3 .00 .03 .03 .02 .5 .00004 24.4 2 2.2 38.8 19.3 .00 .03 .03 .02 .5 .00004 24.7 3 2.4 43.0 19.3 .00 .03 .03 .02 .5 .00003 25.7 L SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 D C N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .51 .00 .51 .00 Wjl 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .50 .00 .50 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .45 .00 .45 .00 1 ELEV 2.2 KD 2944. 1. 2942. 1. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 3050. 1. 3048. 1. 3 ELEV 2.4 KD 3524. 1. 3522. 1. *****WARNING - SECT. 67710 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 2 AT ELEVATION 2.80 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE #$*** 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : _- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 55 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67710 DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 0.0 0.0 1 2.2 37.6 19.3 .00 .04 .04 .02 .5 .00004 24.4 2 2.2 38.6 19.3 .00 .04 .04 .02 .5 .00004 24.6 3 2.4 42.8 19.3 .00 .04 .04 .02 .5 .00003 25.6 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67710 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 D C N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .51 .00 .51 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .50 .00 .50 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .45 .00 .45 .00 1 ELEV 2.2 KD 2925. 1. 2923. 1. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 3031. 1. 3029. 1. 3 ELEV 2.4 KD 3501. 1. 3499. 1. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 56 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION I405d DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- • NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT ***** MESSAGE REACH I405d HAS A DAMAGE LENGTH BUT NO DAMAGE SEGMENT CHECK INPUT DATA ***** 0 1 00 00 **** MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 2.2 24.1 19.3 .00 .00 .02 .02 .6 .00003 15.2 2 2.2 26.3 19.3 .00 .00 .02 .02 .6 .00003 19.6 3 2.4 35.6 19.3 .00 .00 .04 .02 .6 .00002 38.2 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION I405d SEG NO CSM TOTAL I N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19. 0. VELOCITY FPS .83 .80 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19. 0. VELOCITY FPS .79 .73 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19. 0. VELOCITY FPS .60 .54 1 ELEV 2.2 KD 3590, 3590. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 3667. 3667. 3 ELEV 2.4 KD 3992. 3992. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN $$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGNO ALT: 57 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION I405u DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT MESSAGE REACH I405u HAS A DAMAGE LENGTH BUT NO DAMAGE SEGMENT CHECK INPUT DATA $$$## 0 .1 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .1 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***t* 1 2.2 26.0 19.3 .00 .00 .09 .02 .6 .00003 22.5 2 2.2 27.8 19.3 .00 .00 .10 .02 .6 .00003 26.8 3 2.4 35.2 19.3 .00 .00 .18 .02 .6 .00003 45.3 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION I405u SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19. 0. VELOCITY FPS .81 .74 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19, 0. VELOCITY FPS .77 .69 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19. 0. VELOCITY FPS .60 .55 1 ELEV 2.2 KD 3431. 3431. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 3448, 3448. 3 ELEV 2.4 KD 3515. 3515. tt#**WARNING - SECT. 67448 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 2 AT ELEVATION 2.86 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE *$ # i WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : _-_- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: -_-_ 58 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67448 DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 1 2.2 36.3 19.3 .00 .02 .02 .02 .6 .00005 24.1 2 2.2 37.3 19.3 .00 .02 .02 .02 .6 .00004 24.3 3 2.4 41.4 19.3 .00 .02 .02 .02 .6 .00003 25.3 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67448 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 D C N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .53 .00 .53 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .52 .00 .52 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .47 .00 .46 .00 i ELEV 2.2 KD 2788. 1. 2786. 1. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 2891. 1. 2889. 1. 3 ELEV 2.4 KD 3348. 1, 3346. 1. *****WARNING - SECT. 67238 KD VALUES REVERSED ON SEGMENT 2 AT ELEVATION 2.90 VALUE CHANGED TO EQUAL PREVIOUS VALUE $ $ ' WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS : _� PAGE: REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: �~ 59 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67238 DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 1 2.2 35.6 19.3 .00 .12 .12 .02 .6 .00005 23.9 2 2.2 36.5 19.3 .00 .12 .12 .02 .6 .00005 24.1 3 2.4 40.6 19.3 .00 .12 .12 .02 .6 .00004 25.1 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67238 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 D C N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .54 .00 .54 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. • 0. VELOCITY FPS .53 .00 .53 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .48 .00 .47 .00 1 ELEV 2.2 KD 2712. 1. 2710. 1. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 2810. 1. 2808. 1. 3 ELEV 2.4 KD 3255. 1. 3253. 1. 1 wqp? XFQ 01/.10/9.1 09-SA•91 FSGR -------> I nw FI nW fHANNFI <------- WR • PAGE RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SW16d DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH f DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT MESSAGE REACH SW16d HAS A DAMAGE LENGTH BUT NO DAMAGE SEGMENT CHECK INPUT DATA #$#$ 0 .2 0.0 0.0 1 2.2 35.6 19.3 .00 .03 .03 .02 .6 .00020 23.9 2 2.2 36.5 19.3 .00 .03 .03 .02 .6 .00019 24.1 3 2.4 40.5 19.3 .00 .03 .03 .02 .6 .00014 25.1 + SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SW16d SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 C C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 0. 19, 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .54 .00 .00 .54 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 0. 19. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .53 .00 .00 .53 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 0. 19. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .48 .00 .00 .48 .00 .00 1 ELEV 2.2 KD 1359. 1. 1. 1355. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 1407. 1. 1. 1403. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.4 KD 1626. 1. 1. 1622. 1. 1. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$* ALT: 61 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SW16u DA: 1240.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT $ MESSAGE REACH SW16u HAS A DAMAGE LENGTH BUT NO DAMAGE SEGMENT CHECK INPUT DATA * # 0 .2 0.0 0.0 1 2.2 35.8 19.3 .00 .05 .05 .02 .6 .00020 23.9 2 2.2 36.7 19.3 .00 .05 .05 .02 .6 .00018 24.2 3 2.4 40.6 19.3 .00 .05 .05 .02 .6 .00014 25.1 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SW16u • SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 C C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 0. 19. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .54 .00 .00 .54 .00 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 0. 19. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .52 .00 .00 .53 .00 .00 n TCrUADCC rCC 10 n n 10 n n I ELEV 2.2 KD 1370. 1. 1. 1366. 1. 1. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 1417. 1. 1. 1413. 1. i. 3 ELEV 2.4 KD 1630. 1. 1. 1626. 1. 1. 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 ESGR -------> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <------- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 POND TO SW 16TH RUN ##CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 62 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- TITLE P-1 CHANNEL PROFILE - PUMP PLANT TO 16TH AVE. ENDJ08 ********x**x********t***$*****NORMAL END OF JOB------------------------------ 1 WSP2 XEQ 03/30/93 09:58:51 WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: ,M 1 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- • ENDRUN SCS WSP2 VERSION 11/01/90 FILE SUMMARY INPUT : CON-LF12.DAT OUTPUT : CON-LF12.RUN DATED 03/30/93 09:58:51 -- I WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 r UqT WS : PAGE � . t REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: 1 -- ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- WSP2 30. 10 TITLE ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- ,TITLE ::::> LOW FLOW CHANNEL <::::: TITLE GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** DISCHARGE -24.8 1.0 1.0 STARTE GRADu 2.1 2.4 OUTPUT S COMMENT *$ * $$ $ SIDE CHANNEL OPEN $ $ $#$ COMMENT ****SR405 AND GRADY BOXES AS OPEN CHANNELS**** COMMENT ------DISCHARGE FROM PUMP PLANT RECORDS------- REACHGRADu 19.3 0.0 0.0 REACH LFCHI 19.3 30.0 30.0 REACH LFCH2 19.3 110.0 110.0 REACH LFCH3 19.3 110.0 110.0 REACH LFCH4 19.3 90.0 90.0 REACH LFCH5 19.3 100.0 100.0 REACH LFCH6 19.3 70.0 70.0 REACH LFCH7 19.3 130.0 130.0 REACH SW16d 19.3 40.0 40.0 REACH SW16u 19.3 60.0 60.0 REACH 67081 19.3 36.0 36.0 REACH 67056 19.3 25.0 25.0 REACH 67031 19.3 25.0 25.0 REACH 66957 19.3 74.0 74.0 SECTION GRADu 0.0 13.090 0.0 2.05 11.00 2.05 11.00 13.09 12.00 13.09 12.00 0.05 23.00 0.05 23.00 13.09 24.00 13.09 24.00 2.05 35.00 2.05 35.00 13.09 36.00 13.09 36.00 2.05 47.00 2.05 47.00 13.09 48.00 13.09 48.00 2.05 59.00 2.05 59.00 13.09 ENDTABLE SEGMENT GRADu 1.0 C 59.0 13.09 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION LFCHI 0.0 12.0 4.0 10.0 8.0 8.0 10.0 6.0 15.0 4.0 18.0 2.0 36.2 2.0 41.0 4.0 44.0 6.0 47.0 8.0 50.0 10.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT LFCHI 1.0 C 15.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT LFCHI 2.0 C 41.0 NVALUE 0.025 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 1 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT LFCHI 3.0 C 50.0 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION LFCH2 0.0 14.0 32.0 2.0 58.0 2.0 74.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT LFCH2 1.0 C 32.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT LFCH2 2.0 C 58.0 NVAIOF 0-095 NVALUE 0.050 . SECTIC4 LFCH3 0.0 14.0 31.0 2.0 40.0 2.0 52.0 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT LFCH3 1.0 C 31.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT LFCH3 2.0 C 52.0 NVALUE 0.040 SECTION LFCH4 0.0 8.0 4.0 6.0 10.0 4.0 12.0 2.0 25.0 2.0 35.0 4.0 41.0 6.0 46.0 8.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT LFCH4 1.0 C 12.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT LFCH4 2.0 C 25.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT LFCH4 3.0 C 46.0 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION LFCH5 0.0 10.0 6.0 8.0 11.0 6.0 17.0 4.0 22.0 2.0 41.0 2.0 45.0 4.0 49.0 6.0 53.0 8.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT LFCH5 1.0 C 17.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT LFCH5 2.0 C 45.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT LFCH5 3.0 C 53.0 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION LFCH6 0.0 8.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 4.0 13.0 2.0 23.0 2.0 32.0 4.0 1 WSP2 %EQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS ---_ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$* ALT: 2 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 36.0 6.0 40.0 8.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT LFCH6 1.0 C 8.0 NVALUE 0.05 SEGMENT LFCH6 2.0 C 32.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT LFCH6 3.0 C 40.0 NVALUE 0.05 SECTION LFCH7 0.0 14.0 0.1 8.0 5.0 6.0 10.0 4.0 25.0 2.1 40.0 4.0 44.0 6.0 47.0 8.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT LFCH7 1.0 C 0.1 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT LFCH7 2.0 C 40.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT LFCH7 3.0 C 47.0 NVALUE 0.050 SECTION SW16d 0.0 14.0 0.01 2.71 10.0 2.71 17.5 0.21 29.5 0.21 37.0 2.71 60.0 2.71 60.01 14.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SW16d 1.0 C 0.01 NVALUE 0.012 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16d 3.0 C 37.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT SW16d 4.0 C 60.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16d 5.0 C 60.01 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION SW16u 0.00 14.00 0.01 2.72 10.0 2.72 17.5 0.22 29.5 0.22 37.00 2.72 60.0 2.72 60.01 14.00 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SW16u 1.0 N 0.01 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT SW16u 2.0 N 10,0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16u 3.0 N 37.0 NVALUE 0.050 1 WSP2 XEA 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR --)AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS ---_ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 3 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ SEGMENT SW16u 4.0 N 60.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16u 5.0 N 60.01 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION 67081 0.0 17.0 43.0 2.7 68.0 2.7 71.0 1.7 83.0 1.7 86.0 2.7 129.0 17.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67081 1.0 N 68.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67081 2.0 N 86.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67081 3.0 N 129.0 NVALUE 0.025 SECTION 67056 0.0 16.1 4.0 16.0 7.0 15.9 44.0 2.8 75.0 2.8 110.0 17.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67056 1.0 N 44.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67056 2.0 N 75.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67056 3.0 N 110.0 NVALUE 0.040 SECTION 67031 0.0 16.2 8.0 16.0 19.0 13.0 27.0 12.0 42.0 9.0 44.0 7.0 46.0 6.0 49.0 5.0 58.0 2.5 67.0 5.0 71.0 7.0 76.0 8.0 83.0 11.0 97.0 16.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67031 1.0 N 49.0 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 67031 2.0 N 67.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67031 3.0 N 97.0 NVALUE 0.045 SECTION 66957 0.0 12.0 6.0 10.0 10.0 8.0 12.0 6.00 13.0 5.0 25.0 3.4 77 A S 0 id 0 ( A Al A 0 A - l ENDTABLE - SEGMENT 66957 1.0 N 13.0 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 4 � ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ -' NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 66957 2.0 N 33.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 66957 3.0 N 53.0 NVALUE 0.045 COMPUTE GRADu 66957 GRADu ------------------------------END OF DATA LISTING------------------------------ 1 COMPUTE GRADu 66957 GRADu ------------------------------STARTING DATA FROM GIVEN ELEVATION------------------------------ I WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 5 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION GRADu DA: 19.3 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .1 .0 0.0 1 2.1 24.7 199.3 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .5 .00003 16.5 2 2.4 41.3 19.3 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .5 .00002 49.5 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION GRADu SEG NO CSM TOTAL I C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19. 1. VELOCITY FPS .82 .78 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19. 1. VELOCITY FPS .49 .47 1 ELEV 2.1 KD 3613. 3613. 2 ELEV 2.4 KD 4192. 4192. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: -___ 6 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION LFCH1 DA: 19.3 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP • FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1 2.4 7.2 19.3 .00 .01 .01 1.00 2.3 .00779 19.7 2 2.5 8.6 19.3 .00 .01 .01 1.00 2.3 .00434 20.0 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 C C C - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.67 .00 2.68 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. i9. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 2.23 .00 2.23 .00 1 ELEV 2.4 KD 219. 1. 217. 1. 2 ELEV 2.5 KD 293. 1. 291. 1. I WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS : PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$ ALT: 7 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION LFCH2 DA: 19.3 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 2.6 15.3 19.3 .00 .07 .07 1.00 2.2 .00102 28.3 2 2.6 16.1 19.3 .00 .07 .07 1.00 2.2 .00087 28.4 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION LFCH2 • SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19, 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.29 .00 1.32 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19, 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.23 .00 1.25 .00 1 ELEV 2.6 KD 604. 5. 595. 4. 2 ELEV 2.6 KD 654. 6. 644. 4. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS _ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN $*CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$* ALT: 8 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION LFCH3 DA: 19.3 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** • 1 3.0 10.3 19.3 .00 .03 .03 1.00 2.5 .00305 12.4 2 3.0 10.3 19.3 .00 .03 .03 1.00 2.5 .00304 12.4 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION LFCH3 SEG NO CSM TnTAI 1 7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 • DISCHARGE CFS 19. 2. 17. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.89 1.95 1.86 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19, 2. 17. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.89 1.95 1.86 1 ELEV 3.0 KD 349. 41. 308. 2 ELEV 3.0 KD 349. 41. 308. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR --)AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN *$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 9 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION LFCH4 DA: 19.3 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.0 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 3.0 16.8 19.3 .00 .04 .04 1.00 2.4 .00048 19.2 2 3.0 16.8 19.3 .00 .04 .04 1.00 2.4 .00048 19.2 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION LFCH4 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 18. 1. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.30 .34 1.33 .42 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 18. 1. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.30 .34 1.33 .42 1 ELEV 3.0 KD 880. 8. 821. 51. 2 ELEV 3.0 KD 881. 8. 822. 51, 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION(-- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN $*CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 10 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION LFCH5 DA- 19.3 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1 3.1 23.1 19.3 .00 .05 .05 1.00 2.3 .00021 23.8 2 3.1 23.1 19.3 .00 .05 .05 1.00 2.3 .00021 23.8 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION LFCH5 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS .84 .00 .84 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCTTY FPS 24 .00 U AA I ELEV 3.1 KD 1324. 1. 1322. 1. 2 .ELEV 3.1 KD 1326. 1. 1324. 1. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS : -___ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 11 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION LFCH6 DA-- 19,3 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ii ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1 3.1 15.4 19.3 .00 .03 .03 1.00 2.5 .00056 17.7 2 3.1 15.4 19.3 .00 .03 .03 1.00 2,5 .00056 17.7 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION LFCH6 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 C C C ----------------------------------------------------------•------------------------------------------------------------- I DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.26 .00 1.25 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.26 .00 1.25 .00 1 ELEV 3.1 KD 817. 1. 815. 1. 2 ELEV 3.1 KD 818. 1. 816. 1. �1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS ___= PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN *$CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$# ALT: 12 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION LFCH7 DA: 19.3 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.1 0.0 0.0 1 3.3 11.3 19.3 .00 .06 .06 1.00 2.9 .00165 18.9 2 3.3 11.3 19.3 .00 .06 .06 1.00 2.9 .00165 18.9 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION LFCH7 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.71 .00 1.71 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.71 .00 1.71 .00 • 1 ELEV 3.3 KD 474. 1. 472. 1. 2 ELEV 3.3 KD 475. 1. 473. 1. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN$$ ALT: ~� 13 PATTNG TARIF Pnp cFrTTnN Cwlft4 no- 10 7 en MT cvD rncc- nn rnklT rncc- nn NO. ELEV AREA A ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 BANK FULL 2.7 48.8 10.9 .00 .02 .02 27.0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 3.3 86.5 19.3 .00 .06 .06 1.00 .6 .00002 60.0 2 3.3 86.6 19.3 .00 .06 .06 1.00 .6 .00002 60.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SW16d SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 C C C C C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 1. 15, 3. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS .22 .00 .19 .23 .19 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 1. 15. 3. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS .22 .00 .19 .23 .19 .00 1 ELEV 3.3 KO 4378. 4. 273. 3469. 628. 4. 2 ELEV 3.3 KD 4379. 4. 273. 3470. 628. 4. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION— WS : ---- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: -__- 14 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SW16u DA: 19.3 SA MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- N0. ELEV AREA A ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0,0 LOW GRND .2 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 3.3 86.0 19.3 .00 .00 .08 1.00 .6 .00002 60.0 2 3.3 86,0 19.3 .00 .00 .08 1.00 .6 .00002 60.0 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SW16u SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 N N N N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 1. 15. 3. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS .23 .00 .20 .23 .20 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 1. 15. 3. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS .23 .00 .20 .23 .20 .00 1 ELEV 3.3 KD 4269. 2. 249. 3443, 573. 2. 2 ELEV 3.3 KD 4270. 2. 249. 3443. 573. 2. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS : --_- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: --__ 15 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67081 DA: 19.3 SO MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------ ------------ NO. ELEV AREA O ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SO FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM FLEV SLOPE WIDTH 0 1.7 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.7 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 3.3 43.9 19.3 .00 .00 .04 1.00 2.1 .00009 46.9 2 3.3 43.9 19.3 .00 .00 .04 1.00 2.1 .00009 46.9 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67081 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 N N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 7. 12. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS .45 .42 .46 .27 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 7. 12. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS .45 .42 .46 .27 1 ELEV 3.3 KD 1988. 708. 1263. 16. 2 ELEV 3.3 KD 1988. 709. 1264. 16. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION(-- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 16 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67056 DA-- 19.3 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.8 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.8 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 3.3 17.7 19.3 .00 .00 .02 1.00 3.0 .00080 33.9 2 3.3 17.7 19.3 .00 .00 .02 1.00 3.0 .00080 33.9 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67056 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 N N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.12 .00 1.14 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 1.12 .00 1.14 .00 1 ELEV 3.3 KD 684. 6. 672. 5. 2 ELEV 3.3 KD 684. 6. 672. 5, I WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR --)AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: 17 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67031 DA: 19.3 SQ MI EXP COEF= .00 CONT COEF= .00 • ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.5 0.0 0.0 I.OW GRND 7.5 0 0 oo 0.? on n 1 3.6 4.5 19.3 .00 .00 1.00 C 3.6 .01239 1.9 2 3.6 4.5 19.3 .00 .00 .00 1.00 C 3.6 .01239 7,9 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67031 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 N N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.36 .00 4.30 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 4.36 .00 4.30 .00 1 ELEV 3.6 KD 173. 1. 171. 1. 2 ELEV 3.6 KD 173. 1. 171. 1. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ^__ 18 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 66957 DA- 19.3 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 3.4 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 3.4 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 4.3 5.3 19.3 .00 .00 .02 1.00 4.3 .01167 11.3 2 4.3 5.3 19.3 .00 .00 .02 1.00 4.3 .01167 11.3 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 66957 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 N N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.76 .00 3.65 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.76 .00 3.65 .00 1 ELEV 4.3 KD 178. 1. 176. 1. 2 ELEV 4.3 KD 178. 1. 176, 1. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 ESGR -->AGED WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITION<-- WS : _--_ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 GRADY TO 669+57 RUN **CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN** ALT: ____ 19 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- TITLE P-1 CHANNEL PROFILE - SIDE CHANNEL ENDJOB ****************t*************NORMAL END OF JOB------------------------------ 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 08:59:19 WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: 1 ----------------------- ITST OF TWIT UTA WTTH ITMTTF'D FnTTTNr--------------- SCS WSP2 VERSION 11/01/90 FILE SUMMARY INPUT = Ifexist.dat OUTPUT = Ifexist.run DATED 04/13/93 08:59:19 1 V: XEQ 04/13/93 09:05:43 " " � AS : PAGE ' REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 ALT: ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- WSP2 30. TITLE ESGR WATERSHED AS-BUILT CONDITION ,'TITLE P-1 CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN X CHANNEL TRANSITION DISCHARGE -24.8 1.000 .01911 .01911 STARTE SW16d 7.6 2.2 2.4 OUTPUT S COMMENT DISCHARGES FROM 1980 REVISED TR-20 REACH SW16d 1010.0 0.0 0.0 REACH SW16u 1010.0 70.0 70.0 REACH 67081 1010.0 36.0 36.0 REACH 67056 1010.0 25.0 25.0 REACH 67031 1010.0 25.0 25.0 REACH 66957 1010.0 74.0 74.0 SECTION SW16d 0.00 14.00 0.01 2.71 10.0 2.71 17.5 0.21 29.5 0.21 37.00 2.71 60.0 2.71 60.01 14.00 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SW16d 1.0 N 0.01 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT SW16d 2.0 N 10.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16d 3.0 N 37.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT SW16d 4.0 N 60.00 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16d 5.0 N 60.01 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION SW16u 0.00 14.00 0.01 2.72 10.0 2.72 17.5 0.22 29.5 0.22 37.00 2.72 60.0 2.72 60.01 14.00 ENDTABLE SEGMENT SW16u 1.0 N 0.01 NVALUE 0.012 SEGMENT SW16u 2.0 N 10.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16u 3.0 N 37.0 NVALUE 0.050 SEGMENT SW16u 4.0 N 60.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT SW16u 5.0 N 60.01 NVALUE 0.012 SECTION 67081 0.0 17.0 43.0 2.7 68.0 2.7 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 09:05:43 ESGR WATERSHED AS-BUILT CONDITION WS ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN CHANNEL TRANSITION ALT: 1 ------------------------------LIST OF INPUT DATA------------------------------ 71.0 1.7 83.0 1.7 86.0 2.7 129.0 17.0 isENDTABLE SEGMENT 67081 1.0 N 68.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67081 2.0 N 86.0 NVALUE 0.040 SEGMENT 67081 3.0 N 129.0 NVALUE 0.025 CUTTnN S70;5, 44.0 2.8 75.0 \ '.8 110.0 17.0 'ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67056 1.0 N 110.0 NVALUE 0.025 SECTION 67031 0.0 16.2 8.0 16.0 19.0 13.0 27.0 12.0 42.0 9.0 44.0 7.0 46.0 6.0 49.0 5.0 58.0 2.5 67.0 5.0 71.0 7.0 76.0 8.0 83.0 11.0 97.0 16.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 67031 1.0 N 49.0 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 67031 2.0 N 67.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 67031 3.0 N 97.0 NVALUE 0.045 SECTION 66957 0.0 12.0 6.0 10.0 10.0 8.0 12.0 6.00 13.0 5.0 25.0 3.4 33.0 5.0 34.0 6.0 42.0 8.0 44.0 10.0 53.0 12.0 ENDTABLE SEGMENT 66957 1.0 N 13.0 NVALUE 0.045 SEGMENT 66957 2.0 N 33.0 NVALUE 0.025 SEGMENT 66957 3.0 N 53.0 NVALUE 0.045 COMPUTE SW16d 66957 SW16d ------------------------------END OF DATA LISTING------------------------------ 1 COMPUTE SW16d 66957 SW16d ------------------------------STARTING DATA FROM GIVEN ELEVATION------------------------------ 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 09:05:43 ESGR WATERSHED AS-BUILT CONDITION WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN * CHANNEL TRANSITION ALT: Y 2 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SW16d DA: 1010.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .2 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.6 342.1 1010.0 .00 .00 .00 1.00 4.0 .00039 60.0 2 2.2 35.8 19.3 .00 .00 .00 .02 .6 .00013 23.9 3 2.4 40.8 19.3 .00 .00 .00 .02 .6 .00009 25.1 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SW16d SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 N N N N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 1010. 0. 166, 463. 381. 0, 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.04 .00 3.39 2.56 3.39 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 0. o r n 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 0. U. U. 0. VELOCITY FPS .47 .00 .00 .47 .00 .00 1 ELEV 7.6 KD 51023. 8. 8359. 23402. 19245. 8. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 1710. 1. 1. 1706. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.4 KD 2050, 1. 1. 2046. 1. 1. t WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 09:05:43 ESGR WATERSHED AS-BUILT CONDITION WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN * CHANNEL TRANSITION ALT: ___- 3 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION SW16u DA: 1010.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 .2 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND .2 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.6 342.4 1010.0 .00 .00 .10 1.00 4.0 .00047 60.0 2 2.2 35.9 19.3 .00 .00 .04 .02 .6 .00020 24.0 3 2.4 40.8 19.3 .00 .00 .04 .02 .6 .00014 25.1 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION SW16u SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 N N N N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 1010. 0. 182. 407. 420. 0. 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.22 .00 3.73 2.25 3.73 .00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19, 0. 0. 19. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .54 .00 .00 .54 .00 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19, 0. 0. 19. 0. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS .47 .00 .00 .47 .00 .00 1 ELEV 7.6 KD 46417. 8. 8374. 18746. 19280. B. 2 ELEV 2.2 KD 1374. 1. 1. 1370. 1. 1. 3 ELEV 2.4 KD 1640. 1. 1. 1636. 1. 1. 1 WSP2 XEQ 04/13/93 09:05:43 ESGR WATERSHED AS-BUILT CONDITION WS : ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN * CHANNEL TRANSITION ALT: 4 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67081 DA: 1010.0 SQ MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA Q ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT SQ FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 1.7 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 1.7 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.6 299.3 1010.0 .00 .00 .06 1.00 4.9 .00065 72.6 2 2.4 9.5 19.3 .00 .00 .01 .02 2.1 .00613 16.0 . 3 2.5 11.5 19.3 .00 .00 .01 .02 2.1 .00344 16.9 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67081 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 N N N i DISCHARGE CFS 1010. 001. 311. 98. - 1. VELOCITY FPS 3.47 3.77 3.00 2.68 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19, 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 2.03 .00 2.04 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 1.67 .00 1.68 .00 1 ELEV 7.6 KD 39504. 23525. 12189. 3789. 2 ELEV 2.4 KD 246. 1. 244. 1. 3 ELEV 2.5 KD 329. 1. 327. 1. 1 WSP2 XE9 04/13/93 09:05:43 ESGR WATERSHED AS-BUILT CONDITION WS ; ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN * CHANNEL TRANSITION ALT: -___ 5 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67056 DA: 1010.0 SA MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- N0. ELEV AREA 9 ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT S9 FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.8 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.8 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 7.5 201.9 1010.0 .00 .00 .03 1.00 5.7 .00132 55.6 2 3.0 7.1 19.3 .00 .00 .02 .02 C 3.0 .01609 32.2 3 3.0 7.1 19.3 .00 .00 .02 .02 C 3.0 .01609 32.2 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 67056 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 1010. 1010. 1. VELOCITY FPS 5.01 5.00 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19. 0. VELOCITY FPS 2.75 2.73 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 19. 0. VELOCITY FPS 2.75 2.73 1 ELEV 7.5 KD 27751. 27751. 2 ELEV 3.0 KD 152. 152. 3 ELEV 3.0 KD 152. 152, 1 WSP2 XE9 04/13/93 09:05:43 ESGR WATERSHED AS-BUILT CONDITION WS _-_- PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN * CHANNEL TRANSITION ALT: __- 6 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 67031 DA: 1010.0 S9 MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA 9 ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT S9 FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 2.5 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 2.5 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 8.1 101.9 1010.0 .00 .00 .02 1.00 C 8.1 .00590 33.4 ***** WARNING - VELOCITY EXCEEDS 8 FT/SEC. PROFILE MAY BE IRREGULAR DUE TO VELOCITY HEAD CHANGES ***** 2 3.6 4.5 19.3 .00 .00 .00 .02 C 3.6 .01239 7.9 3 3.6 4.5 19.3 .00 .00 .00 .02 C 3.6 .01239 7.9 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 N N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 101O. 42. 935. 33, 1. VELOCITY FPS 11.50 3.58 11.90 2.83 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 4.36 .00 4.30 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 4.36 .00 4.30 .00 1 ELEV 8.1 KD 13146, 545. 12177. 423. 2 ELEV 3.6 KD 173, 1. 171, 1. 3 ELEV 3.6 KD 173. 1. 171. 1. 1 WSP2 XE9 04/13/93 09:05:43 ESGR WATERSHED AS-BUILT CONDITION WS PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN * CHANNEL TRANSITION ALT: 7 RATING TABLE FOR SECTION 66957 DA: 1010.0 S9 MI EXP COEF: .00 CONT COEF: .00 ------------------------------- NO. ELEV AREA 9 ------ACRES FLOODED------- STARTING CRIT FRICTION FLOW TOP FT S9 FT CFS FLOODPLAIN TOTAL CSM ELEV SLOPE WIDTH DAMAGE CHANNEL FT FT/FT FT 0 3.4 0.0 0.0 LOW GRND 3,4 .0 .0 .00 .00 .00 .0 *****MESSAGE- ELEV BELOW FIRST PROFILE. FLOW INTERPOLATED LINEARLY FROM CHANNEL BOTTOM***** 1 9.0 124.9 1010.0 .00 .00 .06 1.00 8.3 .00334 35.0 ***** WARNING - VELOCITY EXCEEDS 8 FT/SEC. PROFILE MAY BE IRREGULAR DUE TO VELOCITY HEAD CHANGES ***** 2 4.3 5.3 19.3 .10 .00 02 .02 4.3 .01167 11.3 3 4.3 5.3 19.3 .00 .00 .02 .02 4.3 .01167 11.3 SEGMENT TABLE FOR SECTION 66957 SEG NO CSM TOTAL 1 2 3 N N N ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 DISCHARGE CFS 1010. 20. 933. 57. 1. VELOCITY FPS 9.36 2.29 9.70 2.84 2 DISCHARGE CFS 19. 0. 19, 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 3.76 .00 3.65 .00 3 DISCHARGE CFS 19, 0. 19. 0. 0. VELOCITY FPS 3.76 .00 3.65 .00 1 ELEV 9.0 KD 17483. 339. 16158. 986. 2 ELEV 4.3 KD 178. 1. 176. 1. 3 ELEV 4.3 KD 178. 1, 176. 1. 1 WSP2 XE9 04/13/93 09:05:43 ESGR WATERSHED AS-BUILT CONDITION WS ____ PAGE REV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 P-1 CONNECTING CHANNEL DESIGN * CHANNEL TRANSITION ALT: -_-_ 8 ----------------------- LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING----------------------- IITLE P-1 CHANNEL PROFILE - TRANSITION SECTION ENDJOB ******************************NORMAL END OF JOB------------------------------ 1 WSP2 XE9 04/13/93 09:05:43 WS _ _ PAGE RFV 11/01/90 VERSION 2.0 AI_T� ! ------ LIST OF INPUT DATA WITH LIMITED EDITING-------------------- -- ----------------- - ENDRUN JOY SCS WSP2 VERSION 11/01/90 FILE SUMMARY INPUT : chantran.dat OUTPUT : chantran.run DATED 04/13/93 09:05:43 of .- U� riro �4'FEW 3 Lo W FLOW 'I— \ OS ,t \46 � j 4 C r {k. 2 + f 6 Z + 2 9 + V I) r K HOUSE / 1 T32pp '� i / ro +IFy/ ry o • w I �O I S T *� CUL �. ZVI / Y Low ro + pP — _ ro 1T32QQ / 73400 to / 17 i EXISTING S.W. 16TH BRIDGE / 1 112 4. HYDRAULICS IV HYDRAULICS OUTLET CONTROL See Fig.4-22 for Standard Corrugated Metal Pipe Culverts Flowing Full,and 100 Fig.4-23 Standard CS Pipe-Arch Culverts Flowing Full. See Figs.4-24 and 90 4-25 for Structural Plate Pipe and Pipe-Arch Culverts Flowing Full. -8O 72.7 (�t 70 le- t: �= 1 L7 �55urv1e- C7ELt��� Gon}vb� C 60 6S: Ke- - r�.Zr7 so S B'7 2000 t1 40-_ s�7. y 24 �4— LL G-•'i — 1 U a 50'; .4 c 30 - _�0 1000 z W Hw —� Ao - 5 43'7 z w J y N 800 sloe. so-+ .6 °G SUBMERGED OUTLET CULVERT ROWING FULL L 20 x 600 120 HW• _ p 500 108 Fo, ouu.1 cro..nm wem..a.B,umPul HW eF -8 ✓_ai 36'7 mN wC• J.•OIMC r 1M only. you 4:1. w 400 ~ 96 1'0 i7 300 84 O�a 10 25: J yp 7 2 9 1200 � 8 25', 6 6 �19 �O° 2 7 60 li 7 c 6 LL 54 U 100 p 3 5 4 8 �°/ -p 80 L �.•�p9 00 °w - 4 c 42 /� = 4 60 c O° 5 3 L SO 36 / 2 40 v 33 �° - 6 _0.33`y —' E EXAMPLE N•T3 Bureau of Public Roods 30 � p° 3o o 0 21 _ a Fig.4-23.Head for cot 27 400 ing full. 20 10 4p0 soo See Figs. 4-27 a 21 Sp0 Structural Plate Pil (All charts,Figs.4-1 1° 1 e Bureau of Public RI Pipe 20 For a culvert floe 6 15 of barrel are used it it is necessary to us, 5 find the headwater. 4 12 3 Velocity of Culver 2 is expressed as discl- HEAD FOR ft, of the barrel. STANDARD C. S. PIPE CULVERTS FLOWING FULL Outlet Velocity fo BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROADS AN,1963 n-0.024 by (computing the ning's equation. Fig. 4-22. Head for corrugated steel pipe culvert with submerged outlet and culvert flowing full. Manufacturers recommend keeping outlet crown not submerged. See note under sketch at top. 1 ''To Provide Faster Service INCLUDE /sev aoY�2 at Lower Cost" ` MAIL STOPS FILE a f 6J?0,5 AIFI- G�rP ��5� I.�a.•— l�✓zt r K 4 -e cS C S Poke l 1jr-e. S PLEASE REPLY J. RE❑ REPLY B7: ❑ REQUIRED ca s 6�,l�jls res c2w�J II► SIG URE _ PHONE NO. DATE -2 — SIGNATURE PHONE NO. DATE FORM S.F.1(5/92) ORIGINATOR: SFND WHITF AN(1 YFI IO\Al(-CW[rc Tr) PPr IPICKIT Pr-('IPIrKIT. V-1011 VC,1n 1 r—DV 1r n DrD,v Ic 11,11,17 s rd4� A Co sfvorEd J xl ±I - S - 37 f —� MA rr A6 ilk �G G7 35 � � 3 .7 6 l9 2t 29 10 II 15 1 IB 2 430 1 33 I i L.)IW Z1Z -!A IUI Cm1Cm Sn�tn// /2�Oriiv Rpe n de{au�s{cge 7. ��C Pluy/Z"Drain Pipc Af Jn/et Fr U/fiord}z Consfrvefion 1 I 50 30 100 50 100 150 2 I i'3�.`._. Scae m Feet 1 t STATE FEO.Ai D PROD.N . .... DIVISION Of HIGHWAYS - 1D WASH -IR-405-3(692) Amok, Washington State SR405 k - � TUKWIL Department of Transportation A TO SOUTH RENTON JOB :!UMBER HOV,L.ANES B7W045 MLGJ r_-�.t, CONTRACT M0. 1 DATE - REvsoN BYAPPD APPROVED GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS • u.P.R.R. 5 e SL.ec4,G9 For dd{� r r ' 1 6 .0 For Ralno.,snmerc cn r� .� " B�W� B.;e �a w sn•c E; � m -7 zl T y 3 FUR GY -3 —_ C T — — \�f,a—_____ )2 P SP _ L"pwr tkOj —�_— i� —•--'�--+---�--•-r-- — _� ——�__,— __ _ _ - ___ mot' RCbr/ l2"Rc.s.P10 12'P.C.S-P. 4 1-3 17 O K+RD/ 5 (e I I 12 14 —OP F— F Consrecn r+av F?rnrf F F vp o.a. QPo Cat+, __ For Rel...v�ahmnrrt co � OP OP -OP op the City of R—'c - back lion a SCole in Feet '^ STATE FED.AID PROJ.NO.*„o.' ,' DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Io WASH ® Washington State SR 44CS .. a aEp I-IR-4c5-s(a9z) K-E 87WO45 w7w Department of Transportation TUKWILA TO SOUTH RENTON —Till Ho. - -HOV LANES DATE REVISION, "APVR V 3OG RrAPPo GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS .704 zz1-oH T.23N. RAE. W.M. For Reln��shmenG Go e y en on sr DIP—+ i:' b�oFFwrs See sheet P-9* o-P• _ (p 9 lo I FM Sw ceWY way - 2 T r Q. 8 ... G P G T-i —— l r•" To 6s repo ed S14o S L-LINE y _ F 17 _Z aqN �{ 77 asro04 to It For RefinquwhmerR t: ` \ t C. V e+" / 2 4, Z7 t gz- o ay z� csScale in Feet ""ISTATE FED.AID PROD.No.s.m s.; 'DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ID WASN �► Washington State SR40S E ,oe .—BEA f-flt-ao5-s(ee2) ® TUKWILA TO SOUTH RENTON K 87WO45 Department of Transportation Co Te T n HOV LANE8 30` _. .555..,1— Rnnlvr nr.ln na`nlnlnriF o� nnl� .,•'.`, rid c A. h-- rzr7 20 z3 v+ c ry V F t 37 40 39 \�— F —F F 7�� f F g-_f _\ 1 35 34 3 19 I 8 W 22 II 13 15 - 18 ZI , 3 30I r I I �r-1 WIW ZIZ AIUi Snsfo// /2"A-in Rpa n de/aur s�ogc). mlm P/uy J2"Drei F3pa Al Tn/et Fo-U/li�nXt,Consfry cfion I 1 50 30 100 50 700 750 200 SCOe in Feet STATE FED.AID PROD.NO.—f I DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 10 WASH Washington' I-IR-40S-3(692) State SR 405 e7wo45 oR Ru CAP Departmentof Transportation TUKWILA TO SOUTH RENTON TE Ca TRAcr Rn - HOV LANES _ REVISION gy gppD -- APPROVE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS P,� L. O I ----i--+.._. ld I R.cf - -- - - I E�ITCH 'ARL-E A - - - --- - - -- - - wN.1 .:' .. •L t3T.$O(yp R4)ip:Ctei0.t55 -.--___.._._. s . S 2tL a� --- — -- SP CIAL CHALWEL PROFILE 5 -- i- --+ - - SI +aO {s73'R1)t,LIG3.Iz(as'Rt) I r ---- EE I � I - 6.67°� --- -- ID 1 ✓ K T-- - '- - + s� b , SPC�IA !- DITCH PRDF`f LE Du(9;1t364'^9)42+00:(�47.'L{.}4o l.•Ltnt I95iCf.16( __:'' t$--22Q—ta0- -rZc+fie i i r -- _, • ::. -Match 6ciat'r -.: ;. � JL---' � '� .. I .:. -� :I r I.: Mairly.FJcis�' . I - :: I Imo. - i ��.02 1 u ( LL SPECIAL DITCH P'ROFfLE E-C.D 74+05(28'L)to ALZ T J , - 8+pg - - SPECIAL DITCH PROFILE i L87+fo(B2•Lt)'fa L 99+75 STATE FED.AID PROD.NO. HIGHWAY DIVISION TB w G I-R-405-3(e92) ® Washington State 87w045 sn 4O6 4 BATE . .REVISION . W/Ag Department of'7ransportatlon sur mu M SO� roa BY APY wo + _ shear/on fb,u ;;, NarnJ I E�,a r,n9 Grown _ -��� Si/fafibn pow , i � Canstruct+oN Gsotect,le For S,ft F�oce I `'� 'H i Inv E/(.S�c ToeR A) M Drirct n of A PLAN - 5 /•� .• /ii,,, �a i E�nLartmret TABLE A SECTION A-A I -roe ofL:nQcrtRaenfsA>a Strvct. Sta. A Note Sta B Inv. E1. g 3p//r�.,y ' RPprnr.G'x 6"2ht:Yr crate.;or sact/:rr 4- PL L/yy+33/B2'XY. L/45iA0 B2 !°Y. 79p 0 Agwns+ 9Q°F[X�,le. Alejo'or S/ic/Pe3>'J-rYar Her/iorrfo/ SILTATION POND DETAILS \ k Sec ca s�rvcon 6eer�'/ems SP.e,o/Pro vi piers (TJP) SILT FENCE DETAIL SECTION B-B S ' v v o ;�; B'OuaryQoeY , B"OYyPuf v ycJ q. fLoy(K9-ZZ) -0 Hone .Io ed Rprap 4LElt�ri.y Graved Lust/ny o r _ i _ �-..a i/�a:y r END VIEW sofran,a Di(ch EL.Co E f'n o, d , ;► SIDE VIEW --� — � ROCK DAM DE TAIL(ty .) B EL.5.0 9 C/A DITCH 5 T/ON �RIPRAP SPILLWAY SECTION L1-45 t-1146+70 L 149+l3(OGgt)r+L/l9+i3/C63'RfJ CIO 3 R/W Cnavn�/ q/Y/ rK Di r<rr �� II Nrty Ret.rniny W>// r 1}:, 7yoico/. Erirtfny Grwn\o ,... TTmP(cn/ ,#:,mAl,(As Rrquired) — --— __1 -�,}` /` Nott Sn Sic rid+ Turin B• 1or cAl- arct[on A'ECIAL DITCH SECTION A f�uelalm L/71•70.. ' / 3O('� ) ro L/44+55(78.5'RtJ SPECIAL CHANNEL SECTION B SPECIAL DITCH SECTION B 4. L/3/+11(8L3A'/) ID L 169•J2(63Rc) L/7I-05(92"L rJ t. AL= 7g+OS(IS'Lt� i� STATE FED.AID PROD.NO ..... ro DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS lO WASH! ® Washington State � LIR-403-3(692) wur�r. M-5 W STW045 Department of Transportation T"�TO SOUTH RENTON tTE conriuct un WN LANES .• REVfSlO>: 8Y PPD SEC.z4 T 23 N. RA E. W M. COMSTMYCTIUM SEIULMC1 GENERAL NOTES Abe STAGE-7 YIDfM SOU TX SIDE Of NMI 8WN1 MIOGF ALL ARTERIAL AND PORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDAIKE WITH THE REW IRFRENTS Of N-/N 2?/f-3 a-e ok/ [aee r ee.woj -Idenf/I'es 4i'e/d aTAU I YIDEN MLRIM SIDE OF SOUIN BUDND RMIDIN THECSTATE F WASHRINGTON.BRIDGE.AND N TRANS�TATIOCONSTNUCTI DATED 19B1.R test ho%s-A•t!er mva,untd I -1,other ftet,s,-d 1. INSTAL, hHFRANY MEOIAM BARRIERS fa 0r9/AO/p' d-menfronl Rho-✓ 41 42-a.//,- /roz T:IE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SERVICE LOAD // 10-76 far orR'�ne/ brRd'"/.Mee- 2, REMOVE EXISTING CURB,RAIL AND WING WALLS AT 18UTKRNTS. DESIGN. 1977 AASHTO 5PECIFICAT IONS, AND INTERIM SPECIFICATION THROUGH IM42f/ME, J. CONSTRUCT THE NEW FOUN'ATIONS,PIERS AND CROSS BEAMS AND SLAY R/W 0. EACEFT THE IE YSTONE CLOSURE PORN FOR CMOSS REAMS AND SLAB. ALL PILES SHALL BE DRIVER TO A DEPTH SUFFICIENT TO DEVELOP A MINI" C\nt\'R�[�[��Rein f. Exf 90• r,CR�[�et, , •�• - A. RELEASE THE FSEYORK UNDER CROSS B: A SLAB AFTER CONCRETE LOAD BLARING CAPACITY Of sE TONS. R�CRR[� GrFe.Aktro fro - N MD ATTAINS STREWTX. - - p Pl 5iwer Ppe tf}\, J} K1 �aa S. CdIFLFTE THE KEYSTONE CLOSME POUR FOR CROSS BEAMS AND SLAB, Z "\ Z'. �N-4 6. INSTALL NEW DRAINS AND KM THE EXISTING DRAINS WITH CLASS AA All CAST_IN-PLACE CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS AA. COMCNEELEYATIOIIS AND OIKMS(ONS SHOWN SHALL BE VCR If RED IN THE ilEl Exist 6•W T. CONSTRUCT THE TRAFFIC b1RRiER1 AK CORPLE iE MCINIMING IiFMS. P. Toe et 7<V STAGE- 1 MEDIAN FILL IN SLAB FALSCWORK SMALL BE CAREFULLY RELEASED 10 PREVENT IMPACT OR UNDUE STRESSES Exist firehydrent to Nl Q Tae e/ / fo be removed IN THE STRUCTURE. THE CLOS NE POUR AND TRAFFIC BARRIER SHALL MDT BE b</C/OCafed,nos in '\\S/apN�N-7 /lOtonduif \ \ �7 0 (� S/� I. REMOVE AND RELOCATE THE TEMPORARY CONCRETE BARRIER 70 NEW PONEO INTIL fALSEWdIR FOR THE ADJACENT STRUCTURES HAS BEEN RELEASED. C AT F s I ION Of I SUPPORTED Lac ION OR STAGE. CONSTRUC ION 2. ■ENJYC EXISTING CMB,RAIL,AM Y B COROUIT. FROM THEKEXIISTING STRUCTTURE. brdge quantities tin ME RDIAN nasueE SLAB LULL u swirl E ,\ SR 405 D. CONSTRUCT THE NEW PAVEMENT SEATS BETWEEN MIDGES AT ABUTMENTS. UML SS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLUS, ONCR ETE COVER MEASUREDE FROM THE ACE Of THE CONCRETE TO THE FACE Of ANY REINFORCING BAN SMALL BE 2'AT THE TDP a Connect erisf slobs A- FORM FOR MEDIAN FILL SLAB,SUPPORT OFF EXISTING STRUCTURE. ROADWAY SLAB.1'AT THE BOTTOM Of THE AGAINST SLABS,'2-1/2'AT ME BOTTOM _D.ck of p _ _ \\evY.S \. 4 instal/Ste d S. CONSTRUCT MEDIAN FILL SLAB. of FaoTI 201'S j'Dad f0 AND ALL DIPPER LOCATIONS 1-Uz'. eats ! PPc \ median barrier 6. REHOYE EMIR AFTER COHCRETI ATTAINS STRENGTH. -THE NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING STRUCTURE.' ELEVATIONS AND DIMENSIONS SHALL E VERIFIED BY THE 7�,i/e \1.1 ,31:Ce S/CO" �L 32'G" CONSTRUCT MEDIANBARRIER AM COMPLETE REMAINING ITEMS. ONTAACTOR IN THE FIELD FOR COMP A' TIBILITY WITH THE `- ` \ i It Sent SMA/47•/S.SO 7z_ ¢R9tAFf \ �+R\ LExiat.Sd.bidgs CCCCCC \, 8. REMOVE THE TEMPORARY MEDUN BARRIERS. u1STING STRUCTURE PRIOR TO FABRICATION. CaveFtd newcaEArN \1\ \ I Dk.of PYv't.StetS.P 405 -�' tv"ist.se.ead \ %\ \ sf /47./6.6/ Cefeb'8asin NdC/9Y9-1 p• 3d=O'Exi9. POadwo Q= �3=0"Exis�.Rosdwa /2-'O"/✓Isets �SR405 _�-�' _ E-_ ---- _ _ \ - =-F== \ _-_--_ (Ion eM -- 9 Stop 6=0" Z t=O�Roodwo /O=0" d 7fk 5fa t Bk.of PsvY.3Re.f �4Sr7Ftf7h\ /.St.#12'/CRaaduif/ `� h-Z Caost. S ogRe C Cyst P0.1. , z-3"0 CAMNdAvt \l 1 45NdyT f TIE 5-145•16.00 O' FZEA"..-5.;F7 /<\ <» 5k<w 2G2900 tnOX. CFrb Ehv. ) / +\ RemalK Brat.2' Canduif oft0rhsd\ To Ton ent CT ) S>`nae 3 Re7rteFE iNy existing nsTM///'d conduit info \\ to br/dp roil CN..d Dr/dgt) 9 YP LOYiA1a drains/remove Iumimire pro/e,-Jocvft � 7YP- junction \ !w \ o C ) exist.jtion box \R' -Exist. dwn ALB.&,Jdge \ EAisf curb and ro//to be sPo \ 405113E 3/ypdifiei Grote lnL•t o, _ _--- - -- _ -------- ----- Nos, 'ed ^emm'ed(1jy.boM AL{fl{I .Remove exlsL 2'j corAtviY �T Ar /}'I CaBduit oTewPR CO7A6• BonrAier I Tem CanC. BOrr'%e." NTc -___-H-3 \\--- / - -- ` N-5 -- \�--------- ��---- \ 16ries Rv IJt L14Rtet R 2"m Camh/if SAW oA) far&Stage emst(Typ) Varies Tvminete a•Ff c cmduif/8'be/aw % AR' - o \ A I ( I wr/es I (Nifcbin cap Toe of 5/ope /4'/9' o ..r-Toe of 5/ape - - _ ----- ) grade md outside preeast I Y F} }-/ -C} - _ barrio 4/:cations Exist curb rail 1" CMduit Install C.LP 7roffic I I F I I I I _F -v-� Sl-Es-Ja_r ( ) 0 $ 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I T 1 I I I r 1} L1-4-tL f i SR 405 fo be removed(Typ.) i\ Barrier(Typ.) I I 11 1 1 I I '1 11 1 1 I I I R 1 i t I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 11 I I 1 1 1 1 I I E e o I I I I I 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I M i t I I I I U U I I 1 1 1 1 Deck RVE DATA SPIRAL DATA P L A N \ LJ u u Lu u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u U Tun Coelr.Be7B1er exist eortb e%r keystone tlas," /4N2445 a / scALe�1••zo' R/w „WP• see&me ShevAh/ 4f `..\1\1 ����\\\\\\\� •� 3tgoe C ft5tr-fidF Pour(7yp) -6 20'0046"Rt DE 2*00'✓0' .�>` -VV J11•�����•"�• •`•••��-•�•::•\�V\�•��•���•" V11v111\ EJ MC Dva✓O over median /G•0o 46 L3 200' Neh Bter ofe//bents is Nso•0!'3/"W SOUTH BOUND ct-r tco.,e 0,/y.y NORTH BOUND etrucr�re On/ (f00" h- ir7c/udedAe Note: eAW ;7e*d,0d.i7 Y• brad t aet/tiex. _ brilgt R�EAut/fiex. TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION .AT MID-SPAN R 286E 79' g � 7 405.57' -L 80064' LOOKING AHEAD ON STATIONING ve'•M1D'. fD® p� p g SCALER I/s'•I•-O' S Q05%ft la.e AB 3•q.Bk.N66.18'4JE IFa ' ,KA A, IfM EXIST.PROFILE GRADE ELEVATIONS b-jIAM N81,'/9'29"E t Ih� ly g In i AT CURB LINES(FROM WEST END) �� b }��►I'V DIALONGSTANCE SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND LEGEND �ih G 5 2 y y Ws ai�h CURB LINE N CURB S.CURB N CURB S CURB Bk.Pav'tS 26.31 Zf.43 2f.77 23.03 An Rn 2IvI Identifies Se fim,Ylew or Defy//. /0.0 F7� 26.26 2f.40 24.77 23.10 B etf V a0 y �,✓�i m W°f Rp y Fixfuicd Fen - 20.0 26,Z4 Z4.37 24,76 23.17 Taken ar.5honv7c ao dr'id e Shed No./5 -0.00%_ Surface Treatment 30.0 2G.25 Z4.41 24 75. 23.14 - g 40.0 2610 I 2f.45 2+.7e 23.57 Exist 6r0ald Lin. T,, 50.0 26.14 2f.47 24.74 23.46 r K6 KQ 3a ¢ 7Y_ -- -- E57"_ --- 0.0 Lf.49 247s 13. 6 Ust dash where Sect/on, Yew or DeRi/-t = . 07 •f/929 ----------- 70.0 25.97 2f.52 2474 23-64 --- k $0.0 25.87 2+.6z 24.75 23.70 is taken 0174(ShO1M7 On the same sheet - N � t L n '/00 Yr NRI LL 30.0 25.70 Zf.49 2+.71 25.80 Norma/M Bent '' Exist Akfro Scwrr 55 T Cont.Plrs Jia Q•1105 C.FS.r 100.0 25.69 Z+.5o 2f.G7 11/ide/P/A'J/eI Ea.�,d �� 23. 90"Cart.Pipe CTYP) //O.0 25.62 2f.51 2f.67 23.90 r Ref.E/ev-/0.00FLAT SLAB BRIDGE-WIDENING � y •7LHC QverAey /20.0 25.5G 2f53 24.G7 23.96 e Dato acquired tram FE.NA Flood Insurance Sfudy, 130.0 25.47 2f.55 2+.67 Z3.93 -•N •'�•� City of Renton"November 511380. 140.0 25.39 Zf.57 24.Gs 24.05 150.0 25.23 Zf.s4 2+1.4 24.o6 LOADING HS-20 /60.0 25.21 2t52 24.Gs 24o! -1 <t/ ti s r E L E V A T 1 0 N /70.0 25.17 2+50 2+� 2+// OR /1=.1.yjWtABW1 A!�B�Y�� SCALE:1'•20' /8" 15.03 Z+.49 2f.to 24./Z I K F7 FVATIr�V^9 AB S7VI1 T 1•- - D 3'd ro w Isao 24.s9 2+.50 24.60 2+.15 TWO 24K AXLES dw 4 C TRS.. - I•-2Q_0' ��^ Dk./BrY.Sed 24.96 2+.52 2f.62 211.10 --• `No p1p" STATE FED.AID PROJ.NO. .. ANq�ER8E9V SR 405 3: WASHi Y �.., ��� �� ® Washington State TUKWILA TO SOUTH RENTON