Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SWP273635(1)
Hebe Bernardo Civil Engineer III Public Works Department Utility Systems Division/Surface Water hbernardo@rentonwa.govCity Of Renton City Hall-5th Floor (425)430-7264 1055 South Grady Way Fax(425)430-7241 Renton WA 98057-3232 rentonwa.gov Hebe Bernardo Civil Engineer III Public Works Department Utility Systems Division/Surface Water hbernardo@rentonwa.gov City of O Renton City Hall-5th Floor (425)430-7264 1055 South Grady Way Fax(425)430-7241 Renton WA 98057-3232 rentonwa.gov COUGHLINPORTERLUNDEEN Bart Balko, P.E., LEED A.P. Civil Project Manager bartb@cplinc.com P 206.343.0460 C 206.399.6857 Z " E � Z O o W � U T Ww Q w - 3 Z n Z F Z z Q W U N w F O N O m ✓ W W O N H J � C — n z W � U Z J W Q > 2 � O F Z r o V w O : ti N aD /4D I i .1 R25.00 \ � � % ��� �,� �` `�;-- � �J Ili I � it .� �'•� 3F�. i Lj/ log _ \ `.' _ \ ._ ♦.y\\ I — -� ,/ f � _ yid- � /. LL 1 �5 \\ \\ \ \� � �_ --- 1•. ��\ \ __ \ i di" \ ,jam° ii � i� \ O \\ 4.00 9 � � ���• �16.62 SUNSET PARK BASE MAP FEBRUARY 7,2014 MOWN SOME L� Lj ° r., del i e s j E OF WL T 9- ► y '.ma`s... ` " , r ir yam t Name Infiltratiorl/Bed Bottom Length: 150ft. Bottom Width : 70ft. Trench bottom slope 1: 0.005 To 1 Trench Left side slope 0: 0.1 To 1 Trench right side slope 2: 0.1 To 1 Material thickness of first layer : 3 Pour Space of material for first layer 0.3 Material thickness of second layer : 0 Pour Space of material for second layer 0 Material thickness of third layer : 0 Pour Space of material for third layer 0 Infiltration On Infiltration rate : 1.2 Infiltration saftey factor : 1 Discharge Structure Riser Height: 3.1 ft. Riser Diameter: 18 in. Orifice 1 Diameter: 1.4 in. Elevation: 0.5 ft. Element Flows To: Outlet 1 Outlet 2 Gravel Trench Bed Hydraulic Table Stage(ft) Area(acr) Volume(acr-ft) Dschrg(cfs) Infilt(cfs) 0.000 0.241 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.039 0.241 0.003 0.000 0.292 0.078 0.241 0.006 0.000 0.292 0.117 0.241 0.008 0.000 0.292 0.156 0.241 0.011 0.000 0.292 0.194 0.241 0.014 0.000 0.292 0.233 0.241 0.017 0.000 0.292 0.272 0.241 0.020 0.000 0.292 0.311 0.241 0.023 0.000 0.292 0.350 0.241 0.025 0.000 0.292 0.389 0.241 0.028 0.000 0.292 0.428 0.241 0.031 0.000 0.292 0.467 0.241 0.034 0.000 0.292 0.506 0.241 0.037 0.004 0.292 0.544 0.241 0.039 0.011 0.292 0.583 0.241 0.042 0.015 0.292 0.622 0.241 0.045 0.018 0.292 0.661 0.242 0.048 0.021 0.292 0.700 0.242 0.051 0.023 0.292 0.739 0.242 0.053 0.025 0.292 0.778 0.242 0.056 0.027 0.292 0.817 0.242 0.059 0.029 0.292 0.856 0.242 0.062 0.031 0.292 0.894 0.242 0.065 0.032 0.292 0.933 0.242 0.068 0.034 0.292 0.972 0.242 0.070 0.035 0.292 1.011 0.242 0.073 0.037 0.292 1.050 0.242 0.076 0.038 0.292 1.089 0.242 0.079 0.040 0.292 1.128 0.242 0.082 0.041 0.292 1.167 0.242 0.085 0.042 0.292 1.206 0.242 0.087 0.043 0.292 1.244 0.242 0.090 0.044 0.292 1.283 0.242 0.093 0.046 0.292 1.322 0.242 0.096 0.047 0.292 1.361 0.242 0.099 0.048 0.292 1.400 0.242 0.101 0.049 0.292 1.439 0.242 0.104 0.050 0.292 1.478 0.242 0.107 0.051 0.292 1.517 0.242 0.110 0.052 0.292 1.556 0.242 0.113 0.053 0.292 1.594 0.242 0.116 0.054 0.292 1.633 0.242 0.118 0.055 0.292 1.672 0.242 0.121 0.056 0.292 1.711 0.242 0.124 0.057 0.292 1.750 0.242 0.127 0.058 0.292 1.789 0.242 0.130 0.058 0.292 1.828 0.242 0.133 0.059 0.292 1.867 0.242 0.135 0.060 0.292 1.906 0.242 0.138 0.061 0.292 1.944 0.242 0.141 0.062 0.292 1.983 0.242 0.144 0.063 0:292 2.022 0.242 0.147 0.064 0.292 2.061 0.242 0.149 0.064 0.292 2.100 0.243 0.152 0.065 0.292 2.139 0.243 0.155 0.066 0.292 2.178 0.243 0.158 0.067 0.292 2.217 0.243 0.161 0.067 0.292 2.256 0.243 0.164 0.068 0.292 2.294 0.243 0.166 0.069 0.292 2.333 0.243 0.169 0.070 0.292 2.372 0.243 0.172 0.070 0.292 2.411 0.243 0.175 0.071 0.292 2.450 0.243 0.178 0.072 0.292 2.489 0.243 0.181 0.073 0.292 2.528 0.243 0.183 0.073 0.292 2.567 0.243 0.186 0.074 0.292 2.606 0.243 0.189 0.075 0.292 2.644 . 0.243 0.192 0.075 0.292 2.683 0.243 0.195 0.076 0.292 2.722 0.243 0.198 0.077 0.292 2.761 0.243 0.200 0.077 0.292 2.800 0.243 0.203 0.078 0.292 2.839 0.243 0.206 0.079 0.292 2.878 0.243 0.209 0.079 0.292 2.917 0.243 0.212 0.080 0.292 2.956 0.243 0.215 0.081 0.292 2.994 0.243 0.217 0.081 0.292 3.033 0.243 0.227 0.082 0.292 3.072 0.243 0.236 0.083 0.292 3.111 0.243 0.246 0.100 0.292 3.150 0.243 0.255 0.247 0.292 3.189 0.243 0.265 0.472 0.292 3.228 0.243 0.274 0.752 0.292 3.267 0.243 0.284 1.080 0.292 3.306 0.243 0.293 1.448 0.292 3.344 0.243 0.303 1.852 0.292 3.383 0.243 0.312 2.291 0.292 3.422 0.243 0.322 2.760 0.292 3.461 0.243 0.331 3.259 0.292 3.500 0.244 0.341 3.785 0.292 MITIGATED LAND USE ANALYSIS RESULTS Flow Frequency Return Periods for Predeveloped. POC #1 Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.073005 5 year 0.124077 10 year 0.166614 25 year 0.231264 50 year 0.287981 100 year 0.352582 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Mitigated. POC #1 Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.063809 5 year 0.123443 10 year 0.162299 25 year 0.206948 50 year 0.236238 100 year 0.262094 Yearly Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Year Predeveloped Mitigated 1950 0.085 0.052 1951 0.377 0.048 1952 0.163 0.071 1953 0.053 0.015 1954 0.037 0.014 1955 0.069 0.011 1956 0.097 0.070 1957 0.112 0.043 1958 0.095 0.060 1959 0.060 0.042 1960 0.063 0.017 1961 0.102 0.070 1962 0.087 0.010 1963 0.034 0.000 1964 0.064 0.000 1965 0.073 0.027 1966 0.049 0.018 1967 0.057 0.017 1968 0.136 0.057 1969 0.074 0.037 1970 0.058 0.036 1971 0.060 0.032 1972 0.064 0.020 1973 0.214 0.065 1974 0.050 0.023 1975 0.066 0.000 1976 0.115 0.065 1977 0.065 0.018 1978 0.024 0.010 1979 0.070 0.057 1980 0.030 0.022 1981 0.090 0.052 1982 0.077 0.037 1983 0.163 0.123 1984 0.065 0.053 1985 0.064 0.012 1986 0.034 0.037 1987 0.122 0.082 1988 0.107 0.076 1989 0.041 0.003 1990 0.029 0.000 1991 0.262 0.491 1992 0.204 0.221 1993 0.058 0.034 1994 0.046 0.000 1995 0.022 0.000 1996 0.063 0.034 1997 0.203 0.074 1998 0.141 0.239 1999 0.071 0.024 Ranked Yearly Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Rank Predeveloped Mitigated 1 0.3767 0.4907 2 0.2619 0.2392 3 0.2141 0.2214 4 0.2035 0.1234 5 0.2033 0.0820 6 0.1633 0.0763 7 0.1631 0.0738 8 0.1408 0.0713 9 0.1356 0.0698 10 0.1219 0.0697 11 0.1154 0.0654 12 0.1116 0.0652 13 0.1074 0.0599 14 0.1022 0.0574 15 0.0973 0.0570 16 0.0946 0.0531 17 0.0902 0.0520 18 0.0873 0.0517 19 0.0852 0.0476 20 0.0769 0.0426 21 0.0741 0.0418 22 0.0735 0.0371 23 0.0709 0.0370 24 0.0700 0.0370 25 0.0686 0.0357 26 0.0660 0.0341 27 0.0652 0.0341 28 0.0645 0.0321 29 0.0644 0.0269 30 0.0643 0.0241 31 0.0637 0.0228 32 0.0633 0.0218 33 0.0632 0.0200 34 0.0600 0.0183 35 0.0597 0.0175 36 0.0584 0.0174 37 0.0581 0.0170 38 0.0566 0.0147 39 0.0532 0.0144 40 0.0501 0.0124 41 0.0489 0.0114 42 0.0456 0.0104 43 0.0412 0.0102 44 0.0373 0.0026 45 0.0340 0.0000 46 0.0337 0.0000 47 0.0302 0.0000 48 0.0292 0.0000 49 0.0244 0.0000 50 0.0219 0.0000 POC #1 Facility FAILED duration standard for 1+ flows. Flow(CFS) Predev Dev Percentage Pass/Fail 0.0365 2145 392 18 Pass 0.0390 1734 340 19 Pass 0.0416 1543 312 20 Pass 0.0441 1267 286 22 Pass 0.0467 1065 260 24 Pass 0.0492 955 233 24 Pass 0.0517 807 199 24 Pass 0.0543 690 172 24 Pass 0.0568 618 156 25 Pass 0.0594 512 132 25 Pass 0.0619 467 116 24 Pass 0.0644 393 90 22 Pass 0.0670 339 73 21 Pass 0.0695 312 59 18 Pass 0.0721 274 50 18 Pass 0.0746 240 37 15 Pass 0.0771 223 31 13 Pass 0.0797 182 20 10 Pass 0.0822 157 19 12 Pass 0.0848 137 17 12 Pass 0.0873 116 17 14 Pass 0.0898 107 17 15 Pass 0.0924 94 17 18 Pass 0.0949 86 17 19 Pass 0.0975 77 17 22 Pass 0.1000 67 17 25 Pass 0.1025 63 17 26 Pass 0.1051 58 17 29 Pass 0.1076 54 17 31 Pass 0.1102 49 17 34 Pass 0.1127 40 17 42 Pass 0.1152 38 17 44 Pass 0.1178 37 17 45 Pass 0.1203 36 16 44 Pass 0.1229 35 16 45 Pass 0.1254 33 16 48 Pass 0.1279 32 16 50 Pass 0.1305 32 16 50 Pass 0.1330 30 16 53 Pass 0.1356 26 14 53 Pass 0.1381 24 13 54 Pass 0.1407 18 13 72 Pass 0.1432 16 12 75 Pass 0.1457 16 12 75 Pass 0.1483 16 12 75 Pass 0.1508 16 12 75 Pass 0.1534 16 12 75 Pass 0.1559 16 12 75 Pass - 0.1584 16 10 62 Pass 0.1610 15 9 60 Pass 0.1635 12 9 75 Pass 0.1661 12 9 75 Pass 0.1686 10 9 90 Pass 0.1711 10 9 90 Pass 0.1737 9 8 88 Pass 0.1762 9 8 88 Pass 0.1788 9 8 88 Pass 0.1813 9 8 88 Pass 0.1838 9 8 88 Pass 0.1864 8 7 87 Pass 0.1889 8 7 87 Pass 0.1915 8 7 87 Pass 0.1940 8 7 87 Pass 0.1965 8 7 87 Pass 0.1991 8 7 87 Pass 0.2016 8 7 87 Pass 0.2042 7 7 100 Pass 0.2067 7 6 85 Pass 0.2092 6 6 100 Pass 0.2118 5 6 120 Fail 0.2143 5 5 100 Pass 0.2169 5 5 100 Pass 0.2194 5 4 80 Pass 0.2219 5 3 60 Pass 0.2245 5 3 60 Pass 0.2270 5 3 60 Pass 0.2296 5 3 60 Pass 0.2321 5 3 60 Pass 0.2346 5 3 60 Pass 0.2372 5 3 60 Pass 0.2397 5 3 60 Pass Y 0.2423 5 3 60 Pass 0.2448 5 3 60 Pass 0.2473 4 3 75 Pass 0.2499 3 3 100 Pass 0.2524 3 2 66 Pass 0.2550 3 2 66 Pass 0.2575 3 2 66 Pass 0.2600 2 2 100 Pass 0.2626 2 2 100 Pass 0.2651 2 2 100 Pass 0.2677 1 .2 200 Fail 0.2702 1 2 200 Fail 0.2727 1 2 200 Fail 0.2753 1 2 200 Fail 0.2778 1 2 200 Fail 0.2804 1 2 200 Fail 0.2829 1 2 200 Fail 0.2854 1 2 200 Fail 0.2880 1 2 200 Fail The development has an increase in flow durations from 1/2 predeveloped 2 year flow to the 2 year flow or more than a 10% increase from the 2 year to the 50 year flow. Water Quality BMP Flow and Volume for POC . ��`�y, ��r On-line facility volume: 0.3421 acre-feet `-� On-line facility target flow: 0.01 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0.3682 cfa. Off-line facility target flow: 0.1618 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0.1829 cfs. Perind and Impind Changes No changes have been made. This program and accompanying documentation is provided 'as-is' without warranty of any kind. The entire risk regarding the performance and results of this program is assumed by the user. Clear Creek Solutions and the Washington State Department of Ecology disclaims all warranties, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to implied warranties of program and accompanying documentation. In no event shall Clear Creek Solutions and/or the Washington State Department of Ecology be liable for any damages whatsoever (including without limitation to damages for loss of business profits, loss of business information, business interruption, and the like) arising out of the use of, or inability to use this program even if Clear Creek Solutions or the Washington State Department of Ecology has been advised of the possibility of such damages. Harrington AVE NE Stormwater Green Connections Project. Planned 1st invoice 4th Actual Budget invoice Task Number i 2 n nvoi d 5th invoice ce 01/22/2014 Expense 05I3112013 06/28/2013 000771 Expense Remaining budget 1000 Project Admin $ 27,605.00 $ 7,863.72 $ 2,579.54 $2,373.29 $1,844.24 $7,058.15 $21,718.94 $ 5,886.06 368.9894 2000 Basemap Preparation $ 37,608.00 $ 22,369.49 $ 2,595.00 $271.88 $135.95 $5,431.84 $30,804.16 $ 6,803.84 452.7467 3000 Public Involvement $ 11,165.00 $ 171.49 $ - 343 8040.531 $8,555.02 $ 2,609.98 327.7811 4000 H drolog c Hydraulic Analysis $ 15,956.00 $ - $ 2,807,05 33.23 4541 $7,381.28 $ 8,574.72 86.08188 5000 Finalize Geotechnical Report $0.00 $ - #DIV/ol 6000 Permit Support $ 3,805.00 $ - $ 440.47 $2,468.38 $2,908.85 $ 896.15 324.5941 7000 Final Design,Construciton Documents $ 108,876.00 $ 26,817.07 $ 15,128.52 $5,860.93 $7,211.58 $29,124.00 $84,142.10 $ 24,733.90 340.1894 8000 Service During Bidding $ 7,688.00 $0.00 $ 7,688.00 0 Total Task $ 212,703.00 $ 57,221.77 $ 23,550.58 $ 11,007.71 $ 9,534.77 $ 54,195.52 $155,510.35 $ 57,192.65 73.1115 .ter r r Sunset Regional Facility/Harrington Avenue Check-in Date & Time: Friday, September 12 from 1 1:00- 12:00 pm Location: Renton City Hall - 5th Floor Room 511 Objective: Review Project status, Renton PM hand-off and Next Steps Time Discussion Topic Notes Harrington Phase II 1 1 :00 am - 95%Submittal - Outstanding Items Harrington Phase I - Construction 1 1:15 am - Status - Issues unset Regional Facility - Schedule - Issues 1 1:30 am ® Ecology UIC requirements e RHA property acquisition and demo Coordination with KC Libra 1 1 :50 am Other Items, Next Steps Predecessors Otr 1,2013 tr 1,2015 tr ID Task Name Duration Start Finish tr 3,2013 Qtr 4,2013 Qtr 1,2014 Qtr 2,201, !014 11Qtr 4 2014 IQ 2015 Qtr 3,2 ...... Dec Jan--LEqb I _LJun IQJul I Dec .44P I FebJ Mar Apr MI. AugSep Oct Nov _De Jan Feb.] M Jun Jul .......... 1 Stormwater Facility NTP 0 days 2W13 2/4/13 214 Sunset Terrace Park 447 3/1113 11/17/14 Design days? 3 Park Master Plan Awar 0 days 3/1/13 3/1/13 311 ............4.......... Park master Plan NTP 1 day? 2/4/14 2/4/1416 5 Park Boundary 1 day 12/30/13 12/30/13 Received 6 Park Master Plan 24 days 12/31/13 1/31/14 36,5 Facility Siting 1 7 Park Master Plan 5 days 2/3/14 2/7/146 ...... Kick-off 8 Master Plan Public 24 wks 3/19/14 9/2/144 Process 9 Final design of Park 24 wks 6/3/14 11/17/14 EVIENRAIN ITFX" "A- 11110 ............................. 10 RHA Coordination 182 days 9/18/13 5/29/14 11 Agreement with RHA 65 days 9/18/13 12/17/13 for the use of Regional Stormwater Facility for onsite mitigation ......................... 12 DEMO-DISPO 0 days 10/1/13 10/1/13 10/1 Application 13 DEMO-DISPO 67 days 10/1/13 111/1412 application approval 14 PIHA Site Trib.Area 0 days 11/12113 11/12/13 I1/112 011111111110 Received from SvR —15 RHA pre-application 5 days 1/2114 1/8/1413 NODE and PIHA sites 16 P&SA between RHA 4.6 wks 1/2/14 2/3/1413 ............ ........... and the City for Sunset proper park parcels 17 RHA demo public 23 days 4/29/14 5/29/14 16FS+60 days To wo housing 18 Task 1 Project Managem 18 days? 1/17/13 2/11/13 19 Project Set-up 2 days 2/4/13 2/5/131 20 Project Management P 2 days 2/6/13 2/7/1319 ...........ii.......... Quality Management PI 2 days 2/8/13 2/11/1320 22 Project Close-out 1 day? 1/17/13 1/17/13 23 Task 2 Supplemental Sui 356 days 2/12/13 6/24/14 24 Review Existing Survey 5 days 2/12/13 2/18/1321 25 Basemap Preparation 5 days 2/19/13 2/25/1324 ........................ 26 Develop Potholing Plan 2 days 6/6/14 6/9/14 25,53 %F 27 Workplan Supplementa 2 days 6/10/14 6/11/1426 28 Procure Potholing Cont 5 days 6/12/14 6/18/1427 29 Field Survey 2 days 6/19/14 6/20/1428 .............................. 30 Update Basemap 2 days 6/23/14 6/24/1429 ...........ji........... Task 3 Public Involvemei 6 days 913/14 9/10/14 32 Prepare Open House B 5 days 9/3/14 9/9/14 60FS-21 days 33 Attend Open House 1 day 9/10/14 9/10/1432 ♦ 9110 34 Task 4 Hydrologic Model 467 days 2/26/13 12110114 ................ 35 Delineate Tributary Are 2 days 2/26/13 2/27/1325 36 Preliminary Sizing 15 days 11/12/13 12/2/13 35,14 37 Conveyance System Si 2 days 6/30/14 7/11/1456 38 LID Performance Mode 2 days 10/2/14 110/3/1460 U 39 Draft Drainage Technic 5 days 10/6/14 10/10/1438 40 City Review 2 wks 10/13/14 10/24/14 39,62 41 Final Drainage Technic 5 days 12/4/14 12/10/14 40,67 42 Task 5 Geotechnical Rep 3 days 10/2/14 1016114 43 Finalize Geotechnical F 3 days 10/2/14 10/6/1460 ................................................. ... ................................................... ..............- ................................................... .............. ........... ............ Task Project Summary RIP 9 Inactive Summary Manual Summary # External Milestone Project:Sunset Terrace Regional Faci Split External Tasks Manual Task Start-only Progress Date:9/11/14 Milestone ♦ External Milestone 10 Duration-only Finish-only Deadline Summary W Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup # External Tasks Page 1 ID Task Name Duration 1 Start Finish jPredecessors Ptr 1 2013 �tr 2,2013 Qtr 3,2013 Qtr 4 2013 IQtr 1,2014 tr 2 2014 tr 3 2014 tr 4,2014 Ptr 1,2015 r 2,2015 Qtr 3, _ _.._.._.. _ i Dec Jan _Feb (_Mar _I1 Apr 1__May �..Jun i Jul I Aug I Sep : Oct Nov I Dec ! Jan I Feb Mar A r , may., _JunIJul_ I,Au Sep Oct__�.Nov___i__Dec , Jan,,,,.[,,-Feb Mar t r Mgy Jun Jul i 44 Task 6 Permit Support 107 days 6/6/14 11/3/14 45 Draft SEPA Checklist 5 days 6/6/14 6/12/14 53 46 Final SEPA Checklist 5 days 6/13/14 6/19/14 45 47 Grading Permit Suppor 3 days 10/30/14 11/3/14 66 48 Task 7 Final Design 184 days 5/12/14 1/22/15 49 30%Design 19 days 5/12/14 6/5114 50 Drawings 15 days 5/12/14 5/30/14 36,7 51 Cost Estimate 2 days 6/2/14 6/3/14 50 52 Special Provisions C 2 days 6/4/14 6/5/14 51 F ; 53 ® Submittal 0 days 6/5/14 6/5/1421,24,52 6/5 54 60%Design 88 days 6/6/14 10/7114 55 30%City Review 2 wks 6/6/14 6/19/14 53 56 30%Comment Res( 1 day 6/27/14 6/27/14 55FS+5 days 57 ® Ecology Comments 15 days 7/3/14 7/23/14 56 58 Resolution of 20 days 7/24/14 8/20/14 57 Ecology Comments 59 KC Library 10 days 8/21/14 9/3/14 58 :? Coordination 60 Drawings 30 days 8/21/14 10/1/14 29,3FS+75 days, 61 Cost Estimate 2 days 10/2/14 10/3/14 60 62 Draft Special Provis', 2 days 10/6/14 10/7/14 61 63 ® Submittal 0 days 1017/14 10/7/14 62 10/7 64 90%Design 45 days 10/8/14 12/9114 65 City Review 2 wks 10/8/14 10/21/14 63 66 Comment Resolutio 1 day 10/29/14 10/29/14 65FS+5 days .I 67 Drawings 25 days 10/30/14 12/3/14 66 68 Cost Estimate 2 days 12/4/14 12/5/14 67 F 69 Draft Final Special F 2 days 12/8/14 12/9/14 68 70 90%Submittal 0 days 12/9/14 12/9/14 69 �12/9 71 100%Design 32 days 12/10/14 1/22/15 72 90%City Review 2 wks 12/10/14 12/23/14 70 73 Comment Resolutio 5 days 12/24/14 12/30/14 72 74 Drawings 15 days 12/31/14 1/20/1573 75 Final Special Provis 2 days 1/21/15 1/22/15 74 76 100%Submittal 0 days 1/22/15 1/22/15 75 1129 77 Advertisement for Bid 0 days 2/20/15' 2/20/15 76FS+21 days 20 78 Bid Opening 1 day 3/9115 3/9115 77FS+10 days 79 Construction Award 1 day 3/31/15 3/31/15 78FS+15 days 80 Construction 54 days 4115/15 6/30115 81 Construction Mobilizatic 5 days 4/15/15 4/21/15 79FS+10 days 82 Construction 40 days 4/22/15 6/16/15 81 v 83 ® Planting 5 dam 6/17/15 6/23/15 82 84 Ecology Grant 0 days 6/30/15 6/30/15 6/30 Expiration Task Project Summary V ® Inactive Summary Manual Summary ♦ Extemal Milestone Project:Sunset Terrace Regional Faci Split ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, External Tasks Manual Task Start-only Progress Date:9/11/14 Milestone ♦ Extemal Milestone ♦ Duration-only „ 3 Finish-only Deadline Summary Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup ♦ External Tasks ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors tr 1,2013 tr 2,2013 tr 3,2013 tr 4,2013 tr 1,2014 tr 2,2014 tr 3,2014 tr 4,2014 Qtr 1,2015 Qtr 2,2015 tr 3, Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr may Jun Jul Au Se Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Au Se Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1 Stormwater Facility NTP 0 days 2/4/13 2/4/13 2/4 2 Sunset Terrace Park 447 3/1113 11/17/14 Design days? 3 Park Master Plan Awar 0 days 3/1/13 3/1/13 311 4 Park master Plan NTP 1 day? 2/4/14 2/4/14 16 5 - Park Boundary 1 day 12/30/13 12/30/13 Received 6 Park Master Plan 24 days 12/31/13 1/31/14 36,5 Facility Siting 7 Park Master Plan 5 days 2/3/14 2/7/14 6 Kick-off 8 Master Plan Public 24 wks 3/19/14 9/2/14 4 ] Process 9 Final design of Park 24 wks 6/3/14 11/17/14 [ 10 RHA Coordination 182 days 9118113 5/29/14 G 11 Agreement with RHA 65 days 9/18/13 12/17/13 L for the use of Regional Stormwater Facility for onsite mitigation 12 "' DEMO-DISPO 0 days 10/1/13 10/1/13 ♦ 10/1 Application 13 DEMO-DISPO 67 days 10/1/13 1/1/14 12 application approval 14 PIHA Site Trib.Area 0 days 11/12/13 11/12/13 11112 Received from SvR 15 RHA pre-application 5 days 1/2/14 1/8/14 13 NODE and PIHA sites 16 P&SA between RHA 4.6 wks 1/2/14 2/3/14 13 [ and the City for Sunset proper park parcels 17 RHA demo public 23 days 4/29/14 5/29/14 16FS+60 days [ ] housing 18 Task 1 Project Managem 18 days? 1/17113 2/11113 19 Project Set-up 2 days 2/4/13 2/5/13 1 1 20 Project Management P 2 days 2/6/13 2/7/13 19 21 Quality Management PI 2 days 2/8/13 2/11/13 20 22 Project Close-out 1 day? 1/17/13 1/17/13 j 23 Task 2 Supplemental Sui 356 days 2/12113 6/24114 24 Review Existing Survey 5 days 2/12/13 2/18/13 21 25 Basemap Preparation 5 days 2/19/13 2/25/13 24 26 Develop Potholing Plan 2 days 6/6/14 6/9/14 25,53 27 Workplan Supplementa 2 days 6/10/14 6/11/14 26 28 Procure Potholing Cont 5 days' 6/12/14 6/18/14 27 29 Field Survey 2 days 6/19/14 6/20/14 28 30 Update Basemap 2 days 6/23/14 6/24/14 29 F 31 Task 3 Public Involvemei 6 days 9/3/14 9/10/14 32 Prepare Open House B 5 days 9/3/14 9/9114 60FS-21 days 33 Attend Open House 1 day 9/10/14 9/10/14 32 ♦ 9/10 34 Task 4 Hydrologic Model 467 days 2/26113 12/10/14 35 Delineate Tributary Are 2 days 2/26/13 2/27/13 25 36 Preliminary Sizing 15 days 11/12/13 12/2/13 35,14 37 Conveyance System Si 2 days 6/30/14 7/1/14 56 38 LID Performance Mode 2 days 10/2/14 10/3/14 60 39 Draft Drainage Technic 5 days 1016/14 10/10/14 38 40 City Review 2 wks 10/13/14 10/24/14 3 9,6 2 41 Final Drainage Technic 5 days 12/4/14 12/10/14 40,67 42 Task 5 Geotechnical Rep 3 days 1012/14 1016/14 43 Finalize Geotechnical F 3 days 10/2/14 10/6/14 60 Task Project Summary W Inactive Summary U l t i l i i 1„i l i t i i I Manual Summary 4;, External Milestone Project:Sunset Terrace Regional Faci Split „1„II1111,,,1111 External Tasks Manual Task Start-only Progress Date:9/11/14 Milestone ♦ External Milestone Duration-only Finish-only Deadline Summary Inactive Milestone I Manual Summary Rollup t+ External Tasks ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors tr 1,2013 tr 2,2013 tr 3,2013 tr 4,2013 tr 1,2014 tr 2,2014 tr 3,2014 tr 4,2014 Qtr 1,2015 tr 2,2015 tr 3, Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Mav Jun Jul AugSe Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Mav Jun Jul Aua Se Oct Nov Dec I Jan I Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 44 Task 6 Permit Support 107 days 6/6/14 11/3/14 45 Draft SEPA Checklist 5 days 6/6/14 6/12/14 53 46 Final SEPA Checklist 5 days 6/13/14 6/19/14 45 47 Grading Permit Suppor 3 days 10/30/14 11/3/1466 48 Task 7 Final Design 184 days 5/12/14 1/22/15 49 30%Design 19 days 5/12114 6/5/14 50 q Drawings 15 days 5/12/14 5/30/14 36,7 51 Cost Estimate 2 days 6/2/14 6/3114 50 52 Special Provisions C 2 days 6/4/14 6/5114 51 53 ra Submittal 0 days 6/5/14 6/5/14 21,24,52 6/5 54 60%Design 88 days 6/6/14 10/7/14 55 30%City Review 2 wks 6/6/14 6/19/14 53 56 30%Comment Res( 1 day 6/27/14 6/27/14 55FS+5 days 57 Ecology Comments 15 days 7/3/14 7/23/14 56 58 Resolution of 20 days 7/24/14 8/20/14 57 Ecology Comments 59 KC Library 10 days 8/21/14 9/3/14 58 Coordination 60 Drawings 30 days 8/21/14 10/1/14 29,3FS+75 days, 61 Cost Estimate 2 days 10/2/14 10/3/14 60 62 Draft Special Provis 2 days 10/6/14 10/7/14 61 63 c Submittal 0 days 10/7/14 10/7/14 62 10/ 64 90%Design 45 days 10/8/14 12/9/14 65 City Review 2 wks 10/8/14 10/21/1463 66 Comment Resolutio 1 day 10/29/14 10/29/14 65FS+5 days 67 Drawings 25 days 10/30/14 12/3/14 66 68 Cost Estimate 2 days 12/4/14 12/5114 67 69 Draft Final Special F 2 days 12/8/14 12/9/14 68 70 90%Submittal 0 days 12/9/14 1219/14 69 12/9 71 100%Design 32 days 12/10/14 1/22/15 72 90%City Review 2 wks 12/10/14 12/23/14 70 73 Comment Resolutio 5 days 12/24/14 12/30/14 72 74 Drawings 15 days 12/31/14 1/20/15 73 75 Final Special Provis 2 days 1/21/15 1122115 74 F 76 100%Submittal 0 days 1/22/15 1/22/15 75 p�1/22 77 Advertisement for Bid 0 days 2120/15 2/20/15 76FS+21 days 20 78 Bid Opening 1 day 3/9/15 3/9115 77FS+10 days 79 Construction Award 1 day 3/31/15 3/31/15 78FS+15 days 80 Construction 54 days 4115115 6/30/15 81 Construction Mobilizatic 5 days 4/15/15 4/21/15 79FS+10 days 0 82 Construction 40 days 4/22115 6/16/15 81 .- 83 Planting 5 days 6/17/15 6/23/15 82 84 Ecology Grant 0 days 6/30/15 6/30/15 y 6130 Expiration Task Project Summary W Inactive Summary „it[ItiE Manual Summary External Milestone Project:Sunset Terrace Regional Faci Split ,,, External Tasks Manual Task Start-only Progress Date:9/11/14 Milestone ♦ External Milestone ♦ Duration-only Finish-only Deadline Summary WI Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks CH2MHILL SUBJECT BY --- SHEET NO. of DATE PROJECT NO. fi .....{..... .....:.... ....................... .....;......:......:.. .....d......i......d............d...._......d......i...................._i........ ......l............ .....:..... c.. i i ...........• i € ..-.J......'...._......'..._......'..._i......'........_......... ....d...._i......:...........e......i......a......i_....i.. - - i i i ' i .....e...._......e......:......o.........i..-..j......:.. i :� I f f i i .............'......i..._.'....-i......'..._i...........i.__....!.♦ i i i i i ♦ i i r I e r i i r a •Ell ♦ • a ....._.._..........•...... ......u.._. i e , , e. : : L a. •..v....a.....!. a J. i y� c • r � ... ;y�II eT_e..a i .....:......:.....:......a..........-.s...._:._...s...... :_.........J.....d.....:..._.: i i . i . ! . i r ; .............. r .. a ,.. •_ i . HIM ....d Al d a...........: .d ..d.. ... . ... ° �e .:..` ! d ! i ...........'.....u.....'...._i......'. i ... ...e •.-....... e e e i ° • i e .....:............:.......................!......!......:........_J......:..................r:......'.........'..i i r p ° a , ♦ 1 ..;......d.....;..... . r ..........;...........:......d.. r i a . ........................... i 4' j. ... r-... ... a .,. ..,.. .I. e ala a e... .: ., a ... ... •. ;....e.. :.. . ...... ....:......:......j.. ...., a ..'. e ! i. ...e... ...... .... °......a....j.. .e...,...a p .. I -e. e._ .......... i. • .u. 1. 1.. AlTv .... .d... ..:.... ITT .. .... ........ ..I..... tI -TTf ..........w. ,.a...,...„...,e..�,.....w.. ,...w.„„.„.,,.,a.»�....w .,,-,„,„a.„„..„.„.w...,...... ..........a...,,,,,.,,w..,,.,......, .w. �a,.........<...,.......°,....,,,,...e......w...........w..�... ,..... Hebe Bernardo From: Dustin.Atchison@CH2M.com Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 9:47 AM To: Hebe Bernardo Cc: Raymond.Chung@CH2M.com Subject: RE: Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility - Native Soil Treatment Capacity Hi Hebe, Re-reading the email string below, it seems that Bobb has already approved of this approach? Do you think we need a more formal documentation that they will accept our proposal to design the facility to bypass all excess flows beyond the capacity of the rain gardens and then conduct soil testing during construction to determine if additional untreated flows could be directed to the subsurface facility. We can discuss this morning. Dustin From: Hebe Bernardo [mailto:HBernardo@Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 10:28 AM To:Atchison, Dustin/SEA; Chung, Raymond/SEA Subject: FW: Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility- Native Soil Treatment Capacity Please see response from Bob Nolan below. Since the project is a retrofit, there is no requirement to treat 91-percent of the runoff. However, all untreated runoff will need to be connected to the downstream system and not the infiltration gallery as we have proposed. We will need to revise the facility as to connect the overflow from the rain garden to the downstream system and not the infiltration gallery. With this approach, no additional requirements for testing will be needed. Thank you and please let me know if you have any questions. From: Nolan, Robert (ECY) [mailto:rnol461Ca1ECY.WA.GOV] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 8:53 AM To: Hebe Bernardo Subject: RE: Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility - Native Soil Treatment Capacity Hi Hebe, You only need testing if you put untreated overflow water into the subsurface infiltration facility. If only treated water is going underground, then no additional testing is required. You have it correct. Bobb From: Hebe Bernardo [HBernardo@Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 7:44 AM To: Nolan, Robert (ECY) Subject: RE: Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility - Native Soil Treatment Capacity 1 Bob, Thank you for your email. I'm failing to understand why additional testing is required if all runoff infiltrated will be treated by the rain garden bioretention soils and the overflow from the rain garden will be connected to the downstream system. It is my understanding that the UIC requirements is to treat the runoff prior to infiltration. Can you please confirm that the additional testing is needed and why? From: Nolan, Robert (ECY) [mailto:rno1461@ECY.WA.GOV] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:58 AM To: Hebe Bernardo Subject: RE: Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility - Native Soil Treatment Capacity Hi Hebe, It is most important that overflows from the bioretention cells be diverted away from the subsurface infiltration facility. So, having an overflow at the flow splitter is step one, but you'll also need an overflow at the bioretention cells, so that any water not flowing through the bioretention media is diverted away from subsurface infiltration. Because this is a retrofit project, you are not required to treat to the 91% annual volume. Any amount of treatment you are providing is better than what is provided currently. Treating 50% of the annual volume is okay, as this is a lot more than is currently getting treated. But the UIC facility requires that we ensure all water discharging to groundwater is getting treatment. This approach is protective of groundwater. We would need a report of the subsurface conditions including CEC for my hydrogeo to review and approve before allowing any otherwise untreated flows to go into the UIC. Bobb From: Hebe Bernardo [HBernardo@Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 2:23 PM To: Nolan, Robert (ECY) Subject: FW: Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility - Native Soil Treatment Capacity Bob, Can the design be modified to limit flows at the flow splitter such that the bioretention cells have adequate capacity under the required 1.5 in/hr design bioretention soil infiltration rate to treat flows prior to discharging to the subsurface infiltration facility? In other words, we would plumb the full 7 acres of off-site tributary area to the flow splitter but limit the orifice such that the flows discharging to the regional facility can be infiltrated within the bioretention facility and excess flows will bypass the facility including the subsurface UIC by discharging to the downstream conveyance system. Under this scenario the project would still be "treating" an area in excess of 3 acres as proposed in the grant application but may provide treatment for a smaller percentage of the annual runoff(e.g. 70-80%of the flow rather than 91%). Using most pollutant reduction models, the net benefit of this scenario would be greater than treating a higher annual flow percentage from a smaller area. To maximize the long-term benefit of the project, we would propose to consider modifying the flow splitter design in the future based on the following: 1. CEC testing of the underlying native soils is conducted during construction. If meeting the requirements for groundwater protection, then additional runoff may be directed to the facility in excess of the capacity of the bioretention soil. 2 I wanted to touch base with you on the Sunset Regional Stormwater Facility. Last week, I sent an email that contained clarification regarding native soil properties for regional stormwater facility. I'm sure you are swamped and just catching up with your emails, but It would be great if we could schedule some time this week to talk about the project. Please let me know what time works best for you.Thanks Bobb and please let me know if you have any questions. From: Hebe Bernardo Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 4:01 PM To: rno1461(&ECY.WA.GOV Subject: FW: Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility - Native Soil Treatment Capacity Bobb Attached is a brief memorandum summarized the native soil characteristics from the geotechnical exploration results in comparison to the State UIC and City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual requirements. With the input from our geotechnical Engineer, we believe the existing native soil (silty sand) underneath the stormwater facility meets the vadose zone requirement that the soil will provide additional treatment to the stormwater runoff enters the facility. The bioretention cells will provide adequate pre-treatment prior infiltrate into native soil. Please review and provide comments as to whether or not this satisfy the soil treatment exemption from providing additional treatment Thank you and please let me know if you have any questions. Have a good weekend. From: Raymond.Chung(d�CH2M.com [mailto:Raymond.Chu ng(a)CH2M.com] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 8:56 PM To: Hebe Bernardo Cc: Dustin.Atchison(&CH2M.com; Raymond.Chung(c)CH2M.com Subject: Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility - Native Soil Treatment Capacity Hebe Attached is a brief memorandum summarized the native soil characteristics from the geotechnical exploration results in comparison to the State UIC and City of Renton Surface Water Design Manual requirements. With the input from our geotechnical Engineer, we believe the existing native soil (silty sand) underneath the stormwater facility meets the vadose zone requirement that the soil will provide additional treatment to the stormwater runoff enters the facility. The bioretention cells will provide adequate pre-treatment prior infiltrate into native soil. Let me know if you have any questions. I will be out of the office tomorrow. Have a good weekend. Thanks Raymond 4 2. Verify in-situ infiltration rate of the bioretention soil. If the bioretetention cell drains at a rate higher than the 1.5 inch/hr as allowed in the 2012 Ecology SW Manual, then could more flow be directed to the facility? Would this approach be allowed in lieu of adding a treatment layer to the design? Under the scenario above,would the bioretention facility need to treat 100%of the flow directed to the facility or 91% of the flow? From: Nolan, Robert (ECY) [mailto:rno146 1(&ECY.WA.GOV] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:45 PM To: Hebe Bernardo Subject: RE: Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility - Native Soil Treatment Capacity Hi Hebe, Yes the treatment layer would address all of our concerns related to groundwater protection. It sounds like a great way to go if you have the time and money to install it. Bobb From: Hebe Bernardo [mailto:HBernardo(iRentonwa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:18 PM To: Nolan, Robert (ECY) Subject: RE: Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility - Native Soil Treatment Capacity Thank you Bobb. And as a follow up question, will the treatment layer will also take care of the concern related to the flow treated? CH2MHILL ran the model using the reduced infiltration rate and came up with 84% runoff being treated, not 91 percent. From: Nolan, Robert (ECY) [mailto:rnol461(1ECY.WA.GOV] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 10:09 AM To: Hebe Bernardo Subject: RE: Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility - Native Soil Treatment Capacity Hi Hebe, I returned your voicemail just now but you didn't pick up. I think adding an approved treatment soil layer is a great idea. Our hydrogeo had concerns with the rapid infiltration rate in the native soils and a treatment layer would provide both treatment capacity and a lower infiltration rate. So that is a definite option but would increase costs and construction time a bit. Bobb From: Hebe Bernardo [mailto:HBernardoCd)Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:56 PM To: Nolan, Robert (ECY) Subject: FW: Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility - Native Soil Treatment Capacity Good afternoon Bob, 3 CO C?n ! cam? 5. m _ 7 Ucn � `��. M ACTT 1 .`11I li it 11 �f� `., �� ` a \ CC€p 11 `,� .. M. V � o ��00 3 '•� r h' Can the Library Z ;; ,� \, move the mid z fn structure to inline CD z with our proposed mmm �`�,♦ `ti ''`, o S line? So we w W z pick up the water. I W j oa— Co cYa tp ` \ �♦ `.` ` / ., r" {�` \ 0 w to r u UC30r Co We can move theNI proposed SD outlet J system further ' south to avoid the f waterline. 01 Future Water line alongshifted j ~� Sunset Ln. Library Building ,! t� _, // �- Front ' ,/,•,�,/� J!'// 01 ,r! !' ``. ` J / /!� �✓ ,,, .i �*`'«� v !r00 01 KEY MAP 1 w4L 1•,50• '—/-- "' LEGEND ' ARCHITECTS NOTE ALL STORM PIPE SMALL BE 2: r- -- IF it PVC OR EQUIVALENT APPROVED e all T H A — n PROPOSED * _ BY THE CrtY of RENTON. ) SCALE I I 0 l J ASPNQT PAMIL rowPR _ I beforeyou ;9 _ ... ._ y-'�✓✓•�✓...�•�-�-�-� ,15pWLLT WLiLAY 1EILPNONC LM'F -...- i • �I ® CONCRETE PAVMIO r 2l5 UK _ =.45- k- I - , B-1-1 or Fa Fc C: l 1 _k E. BUILDINGS ® \\ WATER METER/VALVE/TN= T N 47 , 1-8D0-424-5555 CURM STORM CB/MN ._ ■ ® TRUE NORTH � � IUS coNSLx7ANr TREE W/PROTECtgN ��' i-•� SWTA&SEWER MN/CO �= • COUGHLIN '. CONTOUR(NOD) -lx——100— GAS VALVE/METER ;A: E7 N Q /\ PORTER CONTOLA W —9B— 00 LICKmre as �` �� �I LUNDEEN 1 I I WATER UNE TEUIPNONE RISER/MH • li' —idy — � J PROJECT NORTH 901 SUITE 10 SfOR4 DRAINAGE LINE SEATTLE.WA 98104 0 Sunset Bl vd tVE(SR 900�_ sw+�N"s ` P ,7w1� F.261341 S69t A CONLLXTING STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL E14GINEEKNG CORPORATION STAAAP • .._T *�aYAL.� 7jl lli4 I REVISION NO DATE FUW STREET IMPROVEMENTS \�L To Or Ocs"O AMC IN ! I Xt A{n — Of COIJIMS,POST LQ4,VTr _ Y ' IN00. fb A 19♦Lt 1v pp8�9 Sunset Lane NE ' +—I.rW:� ;fit .:1 ■ -. .Nt.70 - T m 7.50 ' 3111 3 ; `3.fi }X y - 1sTA 3t. ot. 91 u 1 Fr S t ✓ 1.T �. . {�.�. � s. �`y ig•J.. .Z i` 'ty 3 ♦ �e,y/'S a ;`y:� �. �• IQ I ySQDDYOd11EG'Iffi t C= /,// .- y. - ; !' T c-` i I I--k.a.t:^ - -_ - t. : t,• $ lu." r r >; LE e' .34t.a e _ 1�J � ,e ,_ a _ / �tt 'Z.,L(svY .zAY N• ?.. .�1 J — t� .F :5 L..'�.sF'R'. '�>�.I t ` �c ,,t 50 0 I.O1G ,;�� CT N tKw� 3 V - OR / Q3 �� \ .\t� ,u T, AUEn o�N '1t A 1 3. / . �� � \ CINSTO SQt w .r� � T • ...._. i �_...._ S f � ��, OD 34.69 �#wl _ M �• ItSTA3+E,43 35Q,�L Renton Highlands �� I IE•3/6711 IT Sw GRIiIE BREAK �- ` - CONTNWT t�f, ;. '. '`tea' 'Z LE 8'PVCI� 31I.71•B N��S Library J---- -------- - -- ----�---` --- --- - -�- _ ------ - - - - RR - ICONNECT4TQ I�w)CB TYPEI /A I SD�33s�J Si NgL�WW • . ` \ 311h .:<y�r.<y'❑<` -\ ♦r" hI rl' r ��'sCOUPER T a 20D R.—VVA \ ` tr 8•�uC INSTALLED 04 SO LINE 7. !RENCH ORAN TO B.SOCO ;'� .,T; I I LPL ^y- ' I SEE OETAL . GATAGE STUFM /e RIM 344 BD 1e1' ✓ '� . URAINA,x , E N239 SEE DETAIL I•� SiA 31H9GB 707 L a %� � � © / FIRST FLOOR FF-3M3J5 ,�' *j �- � aI GARAGE FF=334.75 7 ~ }: l E=342I3 a(gNjSW LOWER LEVEL - �. o `T= PER Cp135N/PI W 200 ISSUANCE taD 5 GARAGEENTRY Nib AREA DRAM '"{ t / VISTALIEO ON EX WLINE BID DOCUMENTS + \\ RIM.344 41. _ I-. ' / meµ! 1 PROJECT Nt1MBER .. �— E•AI57 C731436-01 2'♦2'.INRUICN DRAW W/a DATE ROCK STF➢.PPF AND wA5!IED JULY 11,2014 ( ROCK KED TO BE J BREAR NI \ p ) �nl i 'PMW� W�MW✓ED✓� SCALE As Shown ■,a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ :.,■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Iw ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ; ■ ■ ■ I ■ ■ URAVANG T TLE 7"" „a t GRADING AND DRAINAGE ! MATCHLINE•SEE SHEET C302 - 4 . s �'I PLAN- NORTH Approved By: Dater Approved 8y: Date: G�y� q�31�� Approved ey:_ _ Date: SHEET NUMBER Approved By: �_ Date: C_301 PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN VER�,SION 2 IMP RVIOUS CALCULATIONS tE C RHA Housing RHA Housing k*- 567 sf Total (3.2 Acres) VrA IN, RHA Housing i o -�- Z ru -- / 95,220 sf Pervious (Planting) J-4 A46 Vault Configuration 7,450 sf 50% Pervious t (Rubberized Safety Surfacing) Evergreen Tree, typ LoadlUn(oad Being Revised Interpretive, Sign 12,346 sf 50% Potential Pervious Pavement (interior pathways, Senck, typ 50% pervious assumed) staging Pergola wl Seatwaff j Restrooml 34,449 sf Impervious Pumproom V ROW Line 24.7% Impervious Notice Perfork" 136ards" Potentiat Art Location, typ ance 5eatingl Open Space IN �7 Potentfat I bass [3er\nn\ ManholelCfeanouts (4) NI Planter, tqp , Pergo(a, typ Pta N W/ Genches, C. 11 V'iew4rtg/ Pic\*vc x Market Rate A Z Libre Hous(ng Play / ark Pathway "IN IN water Feature 03ou(4er XN Vlar.ket Rate Wusing/Mixed Use eatwalf, tqp ' N\ / 4 IN 7 0 Market Rate -N Z Housing SUNSET NEIG"113ORHOOD PARK MASTED NORTH SCALE PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN A VERSION 2 0 RHA Housing RHA Housing Z ION CALCULATIONS /--A39,567 sf Total (3.2 Acres) ZIP MW i v 0 0 RHA Housing '5 95,220 sf Pervious (Planting) A 7,450 sf 50% Pervious Evergreen Tree, typ Load/Unload ' Vault Configuration (Rubberized Safety Surfacing) eing Revised 40,622 sf Impervious `� / i j Interpretive Sign 29.1% Impervious Bench, t Staging _qp ` ! ° 'y l _ ml Restroo Pergola wl Seatwa(( Pumproom --ROW Line IJ Notice Potential Art Location, typ W� Boards" 'x -Performance Potential Manko(elCteanouts (4) Open Space _gar en \\ \ \ Planter, typ ass Pergola typ Plagg 0 wl Benches • -VN [3 0 VIC'nic Market` \Zate Libra H o s ing Fle, r ty \,S'-1-2- ark Pa V Pathway\:, water Featu"re, (Boulder u s IY fnglmo(e Use Se4tW411, typ V% o T-k Market Rate Housing 9 4F '4� SUNSET NEIGHBORHOOD PARK MASTER.,PLA SCALE NORTH /`7Oath .1b tv I vat b ydc(a"IC, k PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN. VERSION 2 RNA Housing a = RHA Housing ti pYPi m.� t(Aj, way K ' RHA Housing O $ ^ ��`�' �cr1 an cG a cc-z quad y + 1N Evergreen Tree, typ- Load/Unload Vault Configu fir► �` 1 Being ('JUU b w ` I rve Sign i`J 1 � �- __ t.r� N E • an ,t� staging a suit Sc - 1 ,e tp ixn Pumproonn :` ,, 4 Pergola wl Seatwaff notice i --Potential Art Location, typ ., Performance Beards" _ '1 Seatr'ngl -` Potential ManholelCleanouts (4) open Space ". Ra;ngar � c s Grass Planter, typ 'i Pergola, typ 1 0 � w, r r( .... Viewing/ ,1 Picnic Market Rate Gazebo q ,. . Housing"' t -��. ti �``� Playground Library r " lk 5-12 yr Park Pathway, typ rf O Water ' r Feature ;A ~�{Boulder Channel} � /Market Rate n HausrnglMtxed USE Seatwall, typ �. Market Rate 11 Housing I SUNSET NEIGHBORHOOD PARK MASTER PLA � �'•�'% ,�-� NORTH SCALE 1 �y I I s a=- F t I 3 f 7 APPENDIX B DING TOOLS APPENDIX B: DECISION MAKING TOOLS 2. DESIGN GUIDELINES INTENT These guidelines provide direction for the development and modification of City of Renton parks. For each of the five park classifications the guidelines describe the purpose of the park type along with the features that are appropriate to that purpose.The City of Renton recognizes that development must comply with county, state and federal regulations that may result in conflicts with the guidelines presented in this document. In such a case,the final design of any facility must comply with the existing regulatory requirements. In addition, some parks and facilities that are currently owned and managed by the city may not meet these design guidelines. Parks and facilities that do not meet these new guidelines have been provisionally classified into the closest park category. The intent of the design guidelines is to: • Uphold the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan; • Protect and enhance the City's quality of life and community image; and • Encourage functional, safe and aesthetically pleasing development while maintaining compatibility with the surrounding environment. • Ensure the distribution of park facilities and experiences consistent with the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan. ORGANIZATION The guidelines are organized by park classification. For each park classification, there are five design guidelines categories: • Size and Access:The size of a park, and particularly the developable area, determines the type of park and uses possible at the site. Access addresses the frontages, preferred modes of transportation and entrances to the site. • Recommended Resources:There is a minimum set of park resources needed for a park location to meet the objectives developed from community input and analyzed in the Community Needs Assessment. Items listed in this sub-heading are intended to be required elements for the given park classification. PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN 1 189 APPENDIX B: DECISION MAKING TOOLS • Additional Resources:The park resources identified in this sub-heading are additional resources for consideration. If site size allows, other resources can be incorporated into the park as long as the impacts of the resource do not exceed the capacity of the size and scale of the intended park site classification. • Structures: If a structure is identified for the park site, additional review and standards will come into play.This section also calls out what non-recreation structures need additional consideration before being located within park sites. • Incompatible Resources: In some cases,there are park resources that conflict with the purpose and character of a particular park classification. NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS INTENT Provide close-to-home recreation opportunities for nearby residents,who typically live within walking and bicycling distance (.25-.5miles) of the park in a residential setting. SIZE AND ACCESS • Minimum developable park size: 2 acres • Property faces front facades of adjacent development • Access from local street or trail RECOMMENDED OUTDOOR RECREATION RESOURCES • Children's play area • Trees (for shade and to preserve • At least one picnic table,one bench urban canopy cover) and grill • Park identification sign • Internal pathway system • Site furnishings(trash receptacles, • Perimeter path or sidewalks bike rack, etc.) • Open turf area 190 1 CITY OF RENTON APPENDIX B: DECISION MAKING TOOLS ADDITIONAL RESOURCES • Neighborhood or Recreation scale • Community garden sport fields • Shelter, shade structure or gazebo • Sport courts • Pedestrian-scale lighting • Other small-scale active recreation • Lights resources (skate spot, horseshoe pits, etc.) Kiosks • Natural areas • Signage • Water • Public art or historic element • Court Lights • Limited off street parking COMPATIBLE BUILDINGS • Restroom • Other small building • Buildings and immediate landscaping should follow Low Impact Development practices (EN-31) • Buildings constructed within parks should be built to LEED Silver standard or better(EN-32) INCOMPATIBLE RESOURCES • Destination facilities or resources with community wide draw • Sport field lighting • Sport field complexes • Full-service recreation centers • Swimming pools (indoor or outdoor) PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL AREAS PLAN 1 191 Harrington Avenue NE U �> Green Connection Stormwater Project www.d.renton.wa.us PROJECT OVERVIEW August 2013 Clean Water - Safe Sidewalks - Green Streets Project Summary - • - Harrington Avenue Green Connection is a stormwater management project that will demonstrate how bioretention N. HIGHLANDS PARK stormwater facilities provide enhanced water quality HILLCREST SCHOOL treatment to pollutant generating streets in Renton's Sunset W. Community. The project is funded through a Departmentwr,7Y, of Ecology grant and by the City of Renton Surface Water �> •t � r ;k Utility. Street improvements will also include new pedestrian amenities such as sidewalks, street trees, and crosswalks yo . NE 16TH ST to make this a safer walkable street, ultimately connecting o ►�: :°" .V'-',r - W. r = ` schools, homes, parks, and the library. McKNIGHT r}` � PRG iLU i wi ril ivN Project Goals ' MIDDLE u, 'AT HARRINGTON AVE NE ._ . ■ Capture stormwater runoff and mimic natural hydrology, SCHOOL w .T' '. :i ,,. including aquifer recharge. z ■ Protect Renton's beaches and fish habitats by reducing JY a pollution entering Johns Creek at Coulon Park and 0 EXISTING W Lake Washington. P , . RENTON I z ' ■ i `..- 1. _ . HIGHLANDS o j� Provide improved stormwater conveyance infrastructure. NE 12TH ST, _Z �f PARK LIBRARY u) , Ify ■ Demonstrate best stormwater management practices. ■ Provide these improvements with minimal construction I ` Q .._-. ,. l;' '; impacts to the neighborhood. t _ , r, ? w TEM _f ■ Improve pedestrian safety and provide a walkable route �' �,_`-- between schools, the public library, and parks. •�� R,, ,1 t A�N Project Schedule SUNSET .;� L' 2013 2014 j, i 'TERRACE'�• a Qo F cc �� 40 cc �� w c o� �,c NE SUNSET BLVD ji- DESIGN TO 405 ti4 La . € PERMITTING .rJt CONSTRUCTION HIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, HIGHLANDS PARK, & FUTURE Cityof Renton SUNSET PARK LIBRARY Project Contact:Hebe C.Bernardo,Project Manager Public Works Department,Surface Water Utility •'=i ' ac f wTi` ' 1055 S Grady Way,5th FI,Renton,WA 98057 hbernardo@rentonwa.gov ;�� NORTH ,Y : d 425.430.7264 r City€,r, 7 s Bioretention with Underdrain Example Photos 42nd . Belmont, Portland SIDEWALK HARRINGTON AVE NE j � s 3iec: s WIDTH ;•�� +�( VARIES 6, SE Ankeny St, Portland ! 3 1 SIDE SLOPE "t � 4 l 18°BIORETENTION ' SOIL MIX YCOMPOST UNDERDRAIN PIPE UNDERDRAIN BEDDING North .• County Bioretention Facilities 5 The existing drainage system at Harrington Avenue collects stormwater runoff from the street and discharges it, untreated, directly into Johns Creek and Lake Washington. The bioretention facilities will collect the stormwater runoff from the street and provide water quality treatment to remove pollutants. Bioretention facilities provide a low cost, visually attractive alternative to J. NE 35th PI, Portland conventional stormwater management that can alleviate the problems associated with those systems. ■ Planted swales capture and slow stormwater runoff from the roadway. s ■ Sediment and pollutants are filtered by plants and soil. ■ The filtered stormwater runoff soaks back into the native soil or flows into the city's existing stormwater system. A series of planted bioretention stormwater facilities with underground a 2nd Ave NW, Seattle perforated pipes will be constructed along Harrison Avenue NE to capture stormwater runoff. These installations will provide enhanced basic water quality treatment and will improve street aesthetics. The project was included I��� as part of the Sunset Area Planned Action EIS and Master Drainage Plan that was adopted by the City Council. ' Typical Bioretention Plants Carex stipata Carex obnupta Cornus kelseyi Rudbeckia fulgida Iris douglasiana Juncus patens Spirea japonica n CR Carex stipata Carex obnupta Cornus kelseyi Rudbeckia fulgida Iris douglasiana Juncus patens Spirea japonica ORDINANCE NO. 5693 ILLJ PARCEL 72270108 'PARCEL 7227801.05 PAROEL# � / 72�7aa.las PARCEL PARCEL i; 7227801055 7221801055 PARCEL# :' 1 f AREA OF RIG 7227801055 TO BE VACK ou _ 9 v � �} R25.00 j I / _ r J s '�A v Lj 54 40 J�, A. ` 1 I �t �� f r 0.8 zz `�\�\ �^ •�'k� �\�\� '�� f1. �'T.. Aa. �.. r�\^\C �y � � it 4"r// Y \ ,� 4.00T62 � % i SUNSET PARK BASE MAP �7 FEBRUARY 7,2014 NOWH SCALE �N DESIGN COMPANY STORMWATER MEMORANDUM DATE: November 1, 2013 TO: Hebe Bernardo FROM: Patty Buchanan,PE Robert McCadden EIT RE: Piha Site Stormwater Renton Housing Authority, Sunset Terrace SvR Project No. 13015 Table 1-Stormwater Requirement Summa Flow Control Flow Control BMPs Water Quality COR Section 1.2.3 COR section 1.2.3.3 COR section 1.2.8 Site x x x ROW x x x Attachments • KCRTS Modeling Results • Existing Conditions Sketch with Areas • Proposed Conditions Sketch with Areas References/Assumptions • Pre-application Meeting Minutes prepared by the City of Renton and dated April 9, 2013 • Site Plan sketches by Schemata Workshop dated July 5, 2013. • Geotechnical Report for Kirkland Townhomes Project, Dated July 25,2012: Design infiltration rate of 1.1 inch/hr with the stipulation that all infiltration facilities be located at least 20 feet from all structures. This memo assumes similar sub surface conditions for this preliminary analysis. Site specific geotechnical investigations will be required for design. Overall Piha Site Stormwater • Per the Pre-application Meeting Minutes, the Project is subject to the Peak Rate Flow Control Standard-Matching Existing. • Per Section 1.2.3 of the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual (COR), the Project is not eligible for any flow control exemptions. • Per COR Sections 1.2.3.3 and 1.2.8, Flow control BMPs and water quality treatment are both required. F:\13\13015 Sunset Terrace\Design\Storm\PihaStormMemo_Jess.doc Stormwater Memorandum November 1,2013 Page 2 of 2 40 On-Site Flow Control,Flow Control BMPs and Water Quality • Flow Control Options include: o Flow control may be achieved by installing a traditional detention system. Based on KCRTS modeling, a 7,500 cubic feet of storage would be required to meet flow control re irements. This could be sized in a 43'x43'x4' (LxWxH)vault. o Flow control may also be achieved by installing a combination of low impact development (LID) to the fullest extent allowed by site constraints, likely in conjunction with a traditional detention system. o Meeting the Project's flow control requirements exclusively with LID does not appear feasible given the level of proposed impervious surface coverage needing mitigation, and setbacks. • For the on-site portion of the Project, the proposed 8,600 square feet of pollution generating parking lot/driveway is the only area that would require runoff treatment. Treatment requirements may be met through the use of Catchbasin Stormfilters or infiltrative BMPs if setbacks and soil property design conditions are met. Right of Way Flow Control, Stormwater BMPs and Water Quality • —42,,5 cubic feet of storage volume would be required in order to meet the Project's flow control requirements with a vault. A 14'x8'x4' (LxWxH)vault is one potential configuration that would meet these requirements. • Pervious sidewalk paving and/or raingardens in the planter strip appear to be the most feasible options for meeting right-of-way flow control BMP requirements. • Water quality treatment is required for the pollution generating portions of the ROW improvements(new roadway surfaces). • If raingardens are utilized in the planter strip,they could provide both flow control and water quality treatment for the roadway surface. Runoff not infiltrated can be treated using a Catchbasin Stormfilter or another approved shallow treatment facility. Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture Environmental Restoration Planning 1205 Second Avenue Suite 200 Seattle,WA 98101 Phone: 206.223.0326 Fax: 206.223.0125 svr@svrdeslgn.com FM 3\13015 Sunset Terrace\Design\Storm\PihaStormMemo_Jess.doc Flow Frequency Analysis - Piha Existing All Time Series File:prepihaall.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- FlowRate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0 .148 4 2/09/01 2 :00 0.332 1 100. 00 0.990 0. 091 6 1/05/02 16: 00 0.184 2 25. 00 0 .960 0.184 2 2/27/03 7 : 00 0.153 3 10. 00 0.900 0. 065 8 8/26/04 2 : 00 0 .148 4 5. 00 0.800 0. 085 7 10/28/04 16: 00 0 . 140 5 3 . 00 0.667 0.153 3 1/18/06 16: 00 0 . 091 6 2 . 00 0.500 0 .140 5 11/24/06 3 : 00 0 . 085 7 1. 30 0.231 0.332 1 1/09/08 6: 00 0 . 065 8 1. 10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0 .283 50 . 00 0.980 1 Flow Frequency Analysis - Piha Developed All Time Series File:devpihaall.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- FlowRate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.261 6 2/09/01 2 : 00 0.525 1 100.00 0.990 0.215 8 1/05/02 16 : 00 0.342 2 25.00 0.960 0.313 3 2/27/03 7: 00 0.313 3 10. 00 0.900 0.235 7 8/26/04 2 :00 0.283 4 5.00 0.800 0.283 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.277 5 3 . 00 0.667 0.277 5 1/18/06 16 : 00 0.261 6 2 . 00 0.500 0.342 2 10/26/06 0 : 00 0.235 7 1.30 0.231 0.525 1 1/09/08 6 : 00 0 .215 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0 .464 50.00 0.980 1 Flow Frequency Analysis - Piha Existing Site Time Series File:prepihasite.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- FlowRate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0. 096 4 2/09/01 2 :00 0.226 1 100. 00 0.990 0. 049 7 1/05/02 16: 00 0.121 2 25. 00 0 . 960 0.121 2 2/27/03 7: 00 0.098 3 10. 00 0.900 0. 020 8 8/26/04 2 : 00 0.096 4 5. 00 0.800 0.053 6 1/05/05 8: 00 0.088 5 3 . 00 0 .667 0. 098 3 1/18/06 16: 00 0.053 6 2 . 00 0.500 0 . 088 5 11/24/06 3 : 00 0.049 7 1.30 0.231 0.226 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.020 8 1. 10 0 . 091 Computed Peaks 0.191 50. 00 • 0.980 . 1 Flow Frequency Analysis - Piha Developed Site Time Series File:devpihasite.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- FlowRate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.201 6 2/09/01 2 : 00 0.406 1 100. 00 0.990 0.165 8 1/05/02 16 : 00 0.260 2 25.00 0.960 0.242 3 2/27/03 7 : 00 0.242 3 10. 00 0.900 0. 179 7 8/26/04 2 : 00 0.215 4 5.00 0.800 0.215 4 10/28/04 16: 00 0.213 5 3 .00 0.667 0.213 5 1/18/06 16:00 0 .201 6 2 . 00 0.500 0.260 2 10/26/06 0:00 0 . 179 7 1. 30 0.231 0.406 1 1/09/08 6:00 0 . 165 8 1. 10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0 .358 50 . 00 0.980 1 • Flow Frequency Analysis - Piha Existing ROW Time Series File:prepiharow.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- FlowRate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0. 052 6 2/09/01 2 : 00 0 .106 1 100. 00 0.990 0.042 8 1/05/02 16 : 00 0 . 065 2 25.00 0. 960 0.062 3 2/27/03 7: 00 0 . 062 3 10. 00 0. 900 0. 045 7 8/26/04 2 : 00 0.055 4 5. 00 0 .800 0. 054 5 10/28/04 16 : 00 0.054 5 3 . 00 0 .667 0. 055 4 1/18/06 16: 00 0.052 6 2. 00 0 .500 0. 065 2 10/26/06 0: 00 0.045 7 1.30 0.231 0.106 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.042 8 1.10 0. 091 Computed Peaks 0.092 50. 00 • 0.980 1 Flow Frequency Analysis - Piha Developed ROW Time Series File:devpiharow.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- FlowRate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.058 6 2/09/01 2 : 00 0.114 1 100. 00 0.990 0.049 8 1/05/02 16 : 00 0.080 2 25. 00 0.960 0.069 3 12/08/02 18:00 0.069 3 10 . 00 0.900 0. 055 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.066 4 5 . 00 0.800 0.066 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.062 5 3 . 00 0.667 0. 062 5 1/18/06 16:00 0. 058 6 2 .00 0 .500 0.080 2 10/26/06 0: 00 0 . 055 7 1.30 0.231 0.114 1 1/09/08 6: 00 0 . 049 8 1. 10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.103 50 . 00 0.980 • 1 Retention/Detention Facility - ROW Type of Facility: Detention Vault Facility Length: 10 .32 ft Facility Width: 10 .32 ft Facility Area: 107 . sq. ft Effective Storage Depth: 4 .00 ft Stage 0 Elevation: 0 .00 ft Storage Volume: 426. cu. ft Riser Head: 4 .00 ft Riser Diameter: 18.00 inches Number of orifices: 2 Full Head Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) (in) (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 1.13 0.069 2 3.00 1.17 0.037 4 .0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) 0 .00 0.00 0. 0 .000 0 .000 0.00 0.01 0.01 1. 0 .000 0 .004 0.00 0.02 0.02 2 . 0 .000 0 .005 0.00 0.04 0.04 4 . 0 .000 0 .006 0.00 0 .05 0. 05 5. 0 .000 0 .007 0.00 0 .06 0.06 6. 0 .000 0 .008 0.00 0 .07 0.07 8. 0 .000 0 .009 0.00 0 .08 0.08 9. 0 .000 0 .010 0.00 0 .09 0.09 10. 0 .000 0 .011 0.00 0 .19 0. 19 20. 0 .000 0 .015 0.00 0.29 0.29 31. 0 .001 0 .019 0 .00 0 .39 0.39 42. 0 .001 0 .022 0 .00 0 .49 0.49 52. 0 .001 0 .024 0.00 0 .59 0.59 63. 0 .001 0 .027 0.00 0 .69 0.69 74. 0 .002 0 .029 0.00 0 .79 0.79 84 . 0 .002 0 .031 0.00 0 .89 0.89 95. 0 .002 0.033 0.00 0 .99 0.99 106. 0 .002 0.034 0 .00 1.09 1.09 116. 0 .003 0 .036 0.00 1.19 1.19 127. 0 .003 0 .038 0.00 1.29 1.29 137. 0 .003 0.039 0.00 1.39 1.39 148. 0 .003 0.041 0 .00 1.49 1.49 159. 0 .004 0.042 0.00 1.59 1.59 169. 0 .004 0.044 0.00 1.69 1.69 180. 0 .004 0.045 0.00 1.79 1.79 191. 0 .004 0.046 0.00 1.89 1.89 201. 0 .005 0.047 0.00 1.99 1.99 212. 0 .005 0 .049 0.00 • 2 .09 2.09 223. 0 .005 0.050 0.00 • 2.19 2.19 233. 0.005 0.051 0.00 2.29 2.29 244. 0.006 0.052 0.00 2.39 2.39 255. 0.006 0.053 0.00 2.49 2.49 265. 0.006 0.054 0.00 2.59 2.59 276. 0 .006 0.056 0.00 2.69 2.69 287. 0 .007 0.057 0.00 2.79 2.79 297. 0 .007 0.058 0.00 2.89 2.89 308. 0.007 0.059 0.00 2.99 2.99 319. 0 .007 0 .060 0.00 3.00 3.00 320. 0 .007 0 .060 0.00 3.01 3.01 321. 0 .007 0 .060 0.00 3.02 3.02 322. 0 .007 0 .061 0.00 3.04 3.04 324. 0.007 0.063 0.00 3.05 3.05 325. 0.007 0.065 0 .00 3.06 3.06 326. 0.007 0.067 0 .00 3.07 3.07 327. 0.008 0.071 0.00 3.09 3.09 329. 0.008 0.071 0.00 3.10 3.10 330. 0.008 0.072 0.00 3.20 3.20 341. 0.008 0.078 0.00 3.30 3.30 352. 0.008 0.083 0.00 3.40 3.40 362. 0.008 0.087 0.00 3.50 3.50 373. 0.009 0.091 0.00 3.60 3.60 384. 0.009 0.094 0.00 3.70 3.70 394. 0.009 0.097 0.00 3.80 3.80 405. 0.009 0.100 0.00 3.90 3.90 416. 0.010 0.103 0.00 4.00 4.00 426. 0.010 0.106 0.00 4.10 4.10 437. 0.010 0.571 0.00 4.20 4.20 448. 0.010 1.420 0.00 4.30 4.30 458. 0.011 2.510 0.00 4.40 4.40 469. 0.011 3.810 0.00 4.50 4.50 479. 0.011 5.280 0.00 4.60 4.60 490. 0 .011 6.710 0.00 4.70 4.70 501. 0 .011 7.240 0.00 4.80 4.80 511. 0 .012 7.740 0.00 4.90 4.90 522. 0 .012 8 .200 0.00 5.00 5.00 533. 0.012 8 .640 0.00 5.10 5.10 543. 0.012 9.060 0.00 5.20 5.20 554. 0.013 9.460 0.00 5.30 5.30 565. 0.013 9.840 0.00 5.40 5.40 575. 0 .013 10 .210 0.00 5.50 5.50 586. 0 .013 10 .560 0.00 5.60 5.60 597. 0 .014 10.910 0.00 5.70 5.70 607. 0 .014 11.240 0.00 5.80 5.80 618. 0 .014 11.560 0.00 5.90 5.90 629. 0 .014 11.880 0.00 6.00 6.00 639. 0 .015 12 .180 0.00 Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Storage Target Calc Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 1 0.12 0.11 0.11 4.00 4.00 426. 0 .010 2 0.06 ******* 0.06 2.55 2.55 271. 0 .006 3 0.07 0.06 0.05 2.45 2.45 261. 0 .006 4 0.08 ******* 0.05 2.33 2.33 248. 0.006 • s 5 0.07 ******* 0.05 2.14 2.14 228 . 0 .005 6 0.06 0.05 0 .05 2.01 2.01 214 . 0 .005 7 0.06 ******* 0 .04 1.22 1.22 130 . 0 .003 8 0.05 ******* 0 .04 1.14 1.14 121. 0 .003 • • • Retention/Detention Facility - On-Site Type of Facility: Detention Vault Facility Length: 43.33 ft Facility Width: 43.33 ft Facility Area: 1877. sq. ft Effective Storage Depth: 4.00 ft Stage 0 Elevation: 0.00 ft Storage Volume: 7509. cu. ft Riser Head: 4.00 ft Riser Diameter: 18.00 inches Number of orifices: 2 Full Head Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) (in) (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 1.14 0.071 2 3.90 4.26 0.155 8.0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0. 0 .000 0.000 0.00 0.01 0.01 19. 0 .000 0 .004 0.00 0.02 0.02 38. 0 .001 0 .005 0.00 0.04 0.04 75. 0 .002 0 .007 0.00 0.05 0.05 94. 0 .002 0 .008 0.00 0.06 0.06 113. 0.003 0 .009 0.00 0.07 0.07 131. 0 .003 0 .009 0.00 0.08 0.08 150. 0 .003 0.010 0.00 0.10 0.10 188. 0 .004 0 .011 0.00 0.20 0.20 375. 0 .009 0 .016 0.00 0.30 0.30 563. 0 .013 0.019 0.00 0.40 0.40 751. 0.017 0 .022 0.00 0.50 0.50 939. 0 .022 0 .025 0.00 0.60 0.60 1126. 0 .026 0.027 0.00 0.70 0.70 1314. 0 .030 0 .029 0.00 0.80 0.80 1502. 0 .034 0 .031 0.00 0.90 0.90 1690. 0.039 0.033 0.00 1.00 1.00 1877. 0 .043 0 .035 0.00 1.10 1.10 2065. 0 .047 0 .037 0.00 1.20 1.20 2253. 0 .052 0 .039 0.00 1.30 1.30 2440. 0 .056 0 .040 0.00 1.40 1.40 2628. 0 .060 0.042 0.00 1.50 1.50 2816. 0 .065 0 .043 0.00 1.60 1.60 3004. 0 .069 0 .045 0.00 1.70 1.70 3191. 0 .073 0.046 0.00 1.80 1.80 3379. 0 .078 0 .047 0.00 1.90 1.90 3567. 0 .082 0.049 0.00 2.00 2.00 3754. 0 .086 0.050 0.00 2.10 2.10 3942. 0 .090 0 .051 0.00 • 2.20 2.20 4130. 0 .095 0 .052 0.00 2 .30 2.30 4318. 0 .099 0 .053 0.00 2 .40 2.40 4505. 0.103 0.055 0.00 2.50 2.50 4693. 0.108 0.056 0.00 2.60 2.60 4881. 0 .112 0.057 0.00 2.70 2.70 5068. 0 .116 0 .058 0.00 2.80 2.80 5256. 0 .121 0 .059 0.00 2 .90 2.90 5444. 0 .125 0 .060 0.00 3 .00 3.00 5632. 0.129 0 .061 0.00 3.10 3.10 5819. 0.134 0.062 0.00 3.20 3.20 6007. 0.138 0.063 0.00 3.30 3.30 6195. 0 .142 0 .064 0.00 3.40 3.40 6382. 0 .147 0 .065 0 .00 3 .50 3 .50 6570. 0 .151 0 .066 0.00 3 .60 3.60 6758. 0 .155 0 .067 0.00 3 .70 3.70 6946. 0 .159 0 .068 0.00 3 .80 3.80 7133. 0 .164 0 .069 0.00 3.90 3.90 7321. 0.168 0 .070 0.00 3.94 3.94 7396. 0.170 0 .075 0.00 3.99 3.99 7490. 0 .172 0.092 0.00 4.00 4.00 7509. 0 .172 0 .098 0.00 4 .10 4 .10 7697. 0 .177 0 .639 0.00 4 .20 4 .20 7884. 0 .181 1.610 0.00 4 .30 4.30 8072. 0 .185 2 .780 0.00 4 .40 4.40 8260. 0 .190 4 .120 0.00 • 4 .50 4.50 8447. 0 .194 5.620 0.00 4.60 4.60 8635. 0.198 7.080 0.00 4.70 4.70 8823. 0.203 7.640 0.00 4.80 4.80 9011. 0.207 8.150 0.00 4.90 4.90 9198 . 0.211 8.640 0.00 5.00 5.00 9386. 0 .215 9.100 0.00 5.10 5.10 9574 . 0.220 9.540 0.00 5.20 5.20 9761. 0 .224 9.960 0.00 5.30 5.30 9949. 0 .228 10.370 0.00 5.40 5.40 10137. 0 .233 10 .750 0.00 5.50 5.50 10325. 0 .237 11.130 0.00 5.60 5.60 10512. 0 .241 11.490 0.00 5.70 5.70 10700. 0 .246 11.840 0.00 5.80 5.80 10888. 0 .250 12 .180 0.00 5.90 5.90 11075. 0 .254 12 .510 0.00 6 .00 6.00 11263. 0 .259 12 .830 0.00 Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Storage Target Calc Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 1 0.41 0.23 0.23 4.02 4.02 7553. 0 .173 2 0.20 ******* 0.07 3 .92 3.92 7355. 0 .169 3 0.20 0.10 0.07 3.43 3.43 6446. 0 .148 4 0.21 ******* 0 .06 3.24 3.24 6084 . 0 .140 5 0.24 ******* 0 .06 2.71 2.71 5084 . 0 .117 6 0.13 0.05 0 .05 1.91 1.91 3592 . 0 .082 7 0.16 ******* 0 .04 1.11 1.11 2086. 0.048 8 0.18 ******* 0.04 1.06 1.06 1985. 0 .046 �► SUNSET TERRACE PIHA SITE EXISTING CONDITIONS t' IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ON PARCEL PERVIOUS SURFACE ON PARCEL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE IN ROW I L w I PERVIOUS SURFACE IN ROW CD N NTS ld� . OC Table 1- Pi ha Parcel Areas Surface Coverage Existing Area (acres) Existing Area {SF} Impervious Surface 0.00 0 Pervious Surface 1.07 46597 Total Area {SF} 1.07 46597 Table 2- Piha Right of Way(ROW) Areas DESIGN COMPANY y^ /� c 1205 SECOND AVE. SUITE 200 Surface Coverage Existing Area (acres) Existing Area {SF} 7 206.2 3. WA 98101 T 206.223.0325 Impervious Surface 0.17 7621 E 206.223.0125 � wwwsvrdc<ign.com Pervious Surface 0.12 5331 PROJECT #13015 \ ITotal Area (SF) 0.301 12952 10/31/2013 SUNSET TERRACE PIHA SITE PROPOSED CONDITIONS - IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ON PARCEL PERVIOUS SURFACE ON PARCEL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE IN ROW I PERVIOUS SURFACE IN ROW I � Q • v NTS CD ; Q / Table 1- Piha Parcel Areas IF N41,11 Surface Coverage Proposed Area (acres Proposed Area (SF) Impervious Surface 0.69 30252 / Pervious Surface 0.38 16345 Y Total Area (SF) 1,0 46597 x Y; / ► DESIGN COMPANY e,. Table 2- Piha Right of Way (ROW) Areas 1205 SECOND AVE. SUITE 200 SEATTLE, WA 98101 Surface Coverage Proposed Area (acres Proposed Area (SF) T 206.223.0326 • � i �} �ry IF206.223 0125 Impervious Surface {).22 9491 �w.svrdesign.corn Pervious Surface 0.08 3461 PROJECT #13015 Total Area (SF) 0,301 12952 10/31/2013 • �` DESIGN COMPANY STORMWATER MEMORANDUM DATE: November 1, 2013 TO: Hebe Bernardo FROM: Patty Buchanan,PE Robert McCadden EIT RE: Node Site Stormwater (Buildings 14, 16, & 17) Renton Housing Authority, Sunset Terrace SvR Project No. 13015 Table 1-Stormwater Requirement Summar Flow Control Flow Control BMPs Water Quality COR Section 1.2.3 COR section 1.2.3.3 COR section 1.2.8 Site Not Required x x ® ROW Not Required x x Attachments • KCRTS Modeling Results • Existing Conditions Sketch with Areas • Proposed Conditions Sketch with Areas References • Pre-application Meeting Minutes prepared by the City of Renton and dated April 9, 2013 • Site Plan sketch by Schemata Workshop dated March 21, 2013 • Geotechnical Report for Kirkland Townhomes Project, Dated July 25, 2012: Design infiltration rate of 1.1 inch/hr with the stipulation that all infiltration facilities be located at least 20 feet from all structures. This memo assumes similar sub surface conditions for this preliminary analysis. Site specific geotechnical investigations will be required for design. Overall Node Site Stormwater • Per the Pre-application Meeting Minutes, the Project is subject to the Peak Rate Flow Control Standard-Matching Existing. • Per Section 1.2.3.LA of the City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 King County Stormwater Design Manual (COR) and the current site plan,the flow control facility requirement for the Project is not required as the developed condition will result in less than a 0.1 cfs increase in stormwater flows from the site for the 100 yr storm event(see attached KCRTS calculations for project areas and stormwater flows). FA13\13015 Sunset Terrace\Design\Storm\NodeStormMemo.doc _ Stormwater Memorandum November_1, 2013 Page 2 of 2 • • Per COR Sections 1.2.3.3 and 1.2.8, flow control BMPs and water quality treatment are both required for the Project. • Given the level of proposed impervious surface coverage and the layout depicted on the preliminary site plan, dispersion BMPs are not feasible • condition for this preliminary analysis. Site specific geotechnical recommendations will be required for final design. On-Site Flow Control BMWs and Water Quality • Approximately 1,100 sf of raingarden BMPs and 4,400 sf of permeable pavement BMPs are feasible for the site. • Assuming a 6"ponding depth for the raingarden, the raingarden would be capable of mitigating 550sf of impervious surface • The porous pavement would mitigate for an equivalent area. • Implementing these two BMPs would mitigate for approximately 5,000 sf of the 16,500 sf of impervious surface proposed for the site. • For the on-site portion of the Project,the 5,700 square feet of pollution generating parking lot/driveway is the only area that would require runoff treatment. Treatment requirements may be met through the use of Catchbasin Stormfilters or infiltrative BMPs if setbacks and soil property design conditions are met. . Right of Way Flow Control BMPs and Water Quality • Raingardens in the planter strip and permeable sidewalks appear to be the most feasible options for meeting right-of-way flow control BMP requirements. • Assuming a 6"ponding depth for the planter strip raingarden,4,600 sf of raingarden bottom area would be required to meet the ROW flow control BMP requirements. Our current Proposed Conditions sketch indicates there will be approximately 3,000 sf of planter strip adjacent to the property. • There is 2,100 sf of sidewalk in front of the property which could be mitigated through the use of permeable sidewalk paving. • If raingardens are utilized in the planter strip, they could provide both flow control and water quality treatment for the roadway surface. Runoff that is unable to be treated or infiltrated in the planter raingarden could be treated thought use of Catchbasin Stormfilters or another approved shallow treatment facility. F:\13\13015 Sunset Terrace\Design\Storm\NodeStonnMemo.doc • ExistingNodeAll Flow Frequency Analysis - Existing Node Project Time Series File:existingnodeall .tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- FlowRate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.149 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.302 1 100.00 0.990 0.121 8 1105102 16:00 0.190 2 25.00 0.960 0.179 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.179 3 10.00 0.900 0.131 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.158 4 5.00 0.800 0.157 5 10/28/04 16:00 O.1S7 5 3.00 0.667 0.158 4 1/18/06 16:00 0.149 6 2.00 0. 500 0.190 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.131 7 1.30 0.231 0.302 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.121 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.264 50.00 0.980 • • Page 1 ProposedNodeAll • Flow Frequency Analysis - Proposed Node Project Time Series File:proposednodeall .tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- FlowRate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.106 4 2/09/01 2:00 0.228 1 100.00 0.990 0.074 7 1105102 16:00 0.130 2 25.00 0.960 0.130 2 2/27/03 7:00 0.111 3 10.00 0.900 0.066 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.106 4 5.00 0.800 0.083 6 10/28/04 16:00 0.103 5 3.00 0.667 0.111 3 1/18/06 16:00 0.083 6 2.00 0. 500 0.103 5 11/24/06 3:00 0.074 7 1.30 0.231 0.228 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.066 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.196 50.00 0.980 • Page 1 • w Predeveloped Flow Frequency Analysis - Existing Node Site Time Series File:predeveloped.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- FlowRate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.064 4 2/09/01 2:00 0.140 1 100.00 0.990 0.043 7 1105102 16:00 0.079 2 25.00 0.960 0.079 2 2/27/03 7:00 0.067 3 10.00 0.900 0.035 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.064 4 5.00 0.800 0.045 6 10/28/04 16:00 0.062 5 3.00 0.667 0.067 3 1/18/06 16:00 0.045 6 2.00 0. 500 0.062 5 11/24/06 3:00 0.043 7 1.30 0.231 0.140 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.035 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.119 50.00 0.980 w . Page 1 Developed Flow Frequency Analysis - Proposed Node Site Time Series File:developed.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- FlowRate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.104 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.209 1 100.00 0.990 0.087 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.140 2 25.00 0.960 0.125 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.125 3 10.00 0.900 0.096 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.116 4 5.00 0.800 0.116 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.111 5 3.00 0.667 0.111 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.104 6 2.00 0. 500 0.140 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.096 7 1.30 0.231 0.209 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.087 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.186 50.00 0.980 Page 1 • • Pre ROW Flow Frequency Analysis - Existing Node ROW Time Series File:pre row.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- FlowRate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.054 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.109 1 100.00 0.990 0.045 8 1105102 16:00 0.071 2 25.00 0.960 0.065 3 2127103 7:00 0.065 3 10.00 0.900 0.049 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.059 4 5.00 0.800 0.059 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.057 5 3.00 0.667 0.057 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.054 6 2.00 0. 500 0.071 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.049 7 1.30 0.231 0.109 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.045 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.096 50.00 0.980 Page 1 0 Dev ROW Flow Frequency Analysis - Proposed Node ROW Time series File:dev row.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis------- FlowRate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.057 6 2/09/01 2:00 0.114 1 100.00 0.990 0.048 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.078 2 25.00 0.960 0.068 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.068 3 10.00 0.900 0.053 7 8/26/04 2:00 0.064 4 5.00 0.800 0.064 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.061 5 3.00 0.667 0.061 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.057 6 2.00 0. 500 0.078 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.053 7 1.30 0.231 0.114 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.048 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.102 50.00 0.980 Page 1 i SUNSET TERRACE NODE SITE ( BUILDINGS 14 , 16 , & 17 ) EXISTING CONDITIONS z ' I O O f r ' CD ry- N E 1 STREET TH 0 N Table 1 - Buildings 14, 16, & 17 Land Coverages in Parcel N T S Surface Coverage Existing Area (acres) Existing Area (SF) Impervious Surface 0,12 5227 Pervious Surface (Lawn) 0.41 17860 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ON PARCEL Total Area 0.53 23087 PERVIOUS SURFACE ON PARCEL ► "�` DESIGN C 0 M P A P Table 2- Buildings 14, 16, & 17 Land Coverages in Right of Way (ROW) 1205 SECOND AVE. SUITE ® IMPERVIOUS SURFACE IN ROW Surface Coverage Existing Area (acres} Existing Area (SF} T 206.2 3. WA 9e101 T 206.223.0125 • Impervious Surface 0.19 8276 1 206.223.0,25 www.svrdesign.rom PERVIOUS SURFACE IN ROW Pervious Surface (Lawn) 0.09 3920 PROJECT #130 Total Area 0.28 12197 10/31/2013 SUNSET TERRACE i • NODE SITE ( BUILDINGS 14 , 16 , & 17 ) PROPOSED CONDITIONS w y w Q xti o s�r • 3 t r 1 � . r N NE I OTH STREET N T S Table 1 - Buildings 14, 16, & 17 Land Coverages in Parcel Surface Coverage Proposed Area (acres) Proposed Area (SF) Impervious Surface 0.38 16553 Pervious Surface (Lawn) 0.15 6534 ® IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ON PARCEL Total Area 0.53 23087 PERVIOUS SURFACE ON PARCEL p /^ Right ��) [�{'��At .�;�:: DESIGN COMPANY Table 2- Buildings 14, 16, & 17 Land Coverages to Right of Way (i'l�lVii) 1205 SECOND AVE. SUITE 200 SEATTLE, WA 98101 • IMPERVIOUS SURFACE IN ROW Surface Coverage Proposed Area (acres) Proposed Area (SF) T 206.223.0326 P 206.223.0125 Impervious Surface 0.21 9148 w ww.svrdesign.co m PERVIOUS SURFACE IN ROW Pervious Surface (Lawn) 0.07 3049 PROJECT #13015 10/31/2013 [Total Area 0,28 12197 Hebe Bernardo OlFrorn: Nolan, Robert (ECY) <rnol461@ECY.WA.GOV> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 7:41 AM To: Khan, Heather (ECY); Hebe Bernardo Cc: Mellon, Sean (ECY) Subject: RE: information request- increase in size of Sunset Regional Facility (G1200544) -- RHA improvements Unless the City of Renton has already adopted the 2012 SWMMWW, the 2005 edition is appropriate. If the City has adopted a different manual (say, the King County manual) then you should design to that manual. Bobb From: Khan, Heather (ECY) Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:25 PM To: Hebe Bernardo Cc: Mellon, Sean (ECY); Nolan, Robert (ECY) Subject: RE: information request- increase in size of Sunset Regional Facility (G1200544) -- RHA improvements Hello Hebe, My understanding is that you are okay to move forward as long as you comply with the 4 items I listed below. And,we •just need confirmation from Bobb that the 2005 standards are still adequate (my guess is they are, but it doesn't hurt to confirm). Unfortunately, he is not in the office at the moment. Sean and Bobb, do you have anything else to add? Kindest regards, Heather From: Hebe Bernardo [mailto:HBernardo(a)Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:10 PM To: Khan, Heather (ECY) Cc: Mellon, Sean (ECY); Nolan, Robert (ECY) Subject: RE: information request- increase in size of Sunset Regional Facility (G1200544) -- RHA improvements Good afternoon Heather, So is it ok to move forward with the understanding that we can increase the size of the regional facility to mitigate for HRA's project without jeopardizing the City's grant funding agreement with the Department of Ecology as long as we comply with the 4 items listed in the email below? Thanks you and please let me know if you have any questions. • From: Khan, Heather (ECY) [mailto:HKHA461(abECY.WA.GOV1 Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:55 AM To: Hebe Bernardo i Cc: Mellon, Sean (ECY); Nolan, Robert(ECY) Subject: RE: information request- increase in size of Sunset Regional Facility (G1200544) -- RHA improvements Hello Hebe, • To answer your question, I think the concern on the facility design was more related to whether RHA would want to implement standards contrary to what Ecology would deem acceptable. Bobb—are the 2005 standards still adequate? Thanks! Kindest regards, Heather From: Hebe Bernardo [mailto:HBernardoCcbRentonwa.gov] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 7:45 AM To: Khan, Heather (ECY) Cc: Mellon, Sean (ECY); Nolan, Robert(ECY) Subject: RE: information request- increase in size of Sunset Regional Facility (G1200544) -- RHA improvements Good morning. Thank you for your email and for sharing your concerns so we can try and address them early on. Something to keep in mind is that the regional stormwater facility will be located in the future sunset park. The land where the Sunset Park will be located is currently owned by RHA. The area is currently developed with low income housing. See file attached. Regional facility will be located in the Sunset Park even if area for mitigation of RHA improvements (buildings 13,15,16 and 17) is not routed trough he regional facility. RHA will complete the demo/dispo process for the existing low income housing by 08/31/2014. Land rights will be • transferred to the City prior to construction of the regional facility and Sunset Park. We are scheduled to begin construction right after. Increasing the size of the regional facility will not have any affect in the schedule for construction and project closeout before grant deadline 06/30/2015. SVR is the consultant engineering firm working with RHA for the engineering design and required mitigation improvements for buildings 13,15,16 and 17 as described in the email below. We've been having discussions with SVR and RHA to related to the information that will be needed from them in order to move forward with 30-percent design at their own expense. We should be receiving all that information by next week, and after that we can move forward with 30-percent design. We understand that we will need to have additional discussions with Ecology related to billing, invoices and cost sharing of the regional facility. I will be contacting you later on in the process (as soon as I have more information) for clarification on this matter. The facilities (bioretention facilities and porous concrete) will be designed and constructed per the City adopter 2009 KCSWDM with City Amendments. This manual is equivalent to the Ecology 2005 manual. Is your request that this facilities are designed to be in compliance with the 2012 Ecology manual? An updated pre-design report will be provided to Bob for review and approval. Report will be completed and provided to Ecology once it has been decided that RHA projects will drain to the regional facility, and preliminary sizing is completed. • A copy of the interlocal agreement will be provided to Ecology. 2 w Thanks a lot for all your help in this project and please let me know if you have any questions. • Best regards, ffgv1i C 160=4rdo Civil Engineer II City of Renton I Public Works Department I Surface Water Utility 1055 S. Grady Way 15th Floor I Renton, WA 98057 9: Direct Office 425.430.7264 FEI n: Direct Fax 425.430.7241 ®: hbernardona rentonwa.00v �� (,sly of �J C r r rr From: Khan, Heather (ECY) [mailto:HKHA461(&ECY.WA.GOV] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 10:05 AM To: Hebe Bernardo Cc: Mellon, Sean (ECY); Nolan, Robert(ECY) Subject: RE: information request- increase in size of Sunset Regional Facility (G1200544) -- RHA improvements Hello Hebe, I ran your request by Sean and Bobb. We all agree this is doable with one major concern with the timeline. Please see Bobb's comment below. Would you please address this concern? •"I am also concerned with their ability to construct this facility before the grant deadline—June 30, 2015. Most big projects should have their design approved this winter and go to bid in the spring, with major construction next summer —2014. It is difficult to construct pond projects in the winter and spring and get them complete by June—thus most grant projects should be doing their major construction next summer." They also brought up the following points for your consideration: 1) You will need to break out eligible and ineligible costs prior to billing. 2) Ecology would request that you follow its standards for the porous and bioretention facility installs. ' 3) Bobb will need an updated pre-design report. 4) 1 will need a copy of the interlocal agreement between City of Renton and RHA. Pl�ase let me know if you have any questions and if you decide to move forward with RHA on this plan. Thanks! --------------- Kin sr gards, Heather Heather Khan Stormwater Grants & Restoration Specialist Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190- 160th Ave SE •Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 P: 425-649-7003 3 A • From: Hebe Bernardo [mailto:HBernardoC�Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 2:47 PM To: Khan, Heather (ECY) Subject: information request- increase in size of Sunset Regional Faiclity -- RHA improvements Good morning Heather, As discussed in our phone call last week, Renton Housing Authority (RHA) has decided to explore the wisdom of helping increase the LID facilities to be constructed in the Sunset Park. More specifically, increase the size of the regional stormwater facility to accommodate for the impacts of buildings 13,15,16 and 17. Buildings 13 and 15 will be moved to the PIHA site to free-up the entire land inside of Sunset Lane for the new Sunset Park. Please see file attached. With Ecology's support to increase the scope of the project, we think this could be a great win-win solution. All costs associated with integrating the RHA proposal into the City regional stormwater facility project would be funded by the RHA. This will include design and construction of the regional stormwater facility. The City will require that in order for RHA to increase the size of the regional facility to mitigate for their required project stormwater improvements an agreement between the City and RHA is signed. The agreemen will require RHA to construct bioretention facilities and porous concrete sidewalk along NE 10th St. to mitigate ie for required ROW improvements and increase the LID facilities to be constructed in the Sunset Area; and that costs associated with integrating the RHA proposal into the City regional stormwater facility project would be funded by the RHA. I'm looking for guidance on whether or not the arrangement to increase the size of the facility to mitigate for HRA's project will jeopardize or conflict with the City's grant funding agreement with the Department of Ecology for the design and construction of the Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility. Thank you so much Heather and please let me know if you have any questions. The Sunset Best regards, Hoai C. B�rrdo Civil Engineer II City of Renton I Public Works Department I Surface Water Utility 1055 S. Grady Way 15th Floor I Renton,WA 98057 W: Direct Office 425.430.7264 r�=] : Direct Fax 425.430.7241 ®: hbernardo(ccilrentonwa.gov 4 Hebe Bernardo • From: Hebe Bernardo Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 1:44 PM To: Dustin.Atchison@CH2M.com Cc: Raymond.Chung@CH2M.com Subject: FW: Sunset Regional Stormwater Facility - RHA Coordination Good afternoon Dustin. Please see email from SVR below. I don't see how they trigger detention for the NODE property specially with the information provided, but that is something we will need to discuss with them. Thanks a lot Dustin for all your help. From: Robert McCadden (maiIto:robertm@svrdesign.com] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 1:19 PM To: Hebe Bernardo Cc: Ronald Straka; Dave Rodgers; Patty Buchanan; 'Grace Kim' Subject: RE: Sunset Regional Stormwater Facility - RHA Coordination • Good afternoon Hebe, To reiterate, the following adjustments to our design assumptions can be made at this time: • Elevation drop assumption for on-site treatment facilities may be reduced to 2.3' • Reduction in slope of on-site storm drain pipe to 1% (provided min. scouring velocity is achievable) These two adjustment to our design assumptions will allow us to tie into the regional infiltration facility at the following elevations for each site. • Piha Site—332.5' • Node Site Please see our responses to you questions below in green. Regards, Robert McCadden, E.I.T. I civil designer SvR Design Company 1205 Second Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98101 t. 206.223.0326 ext. 1038 f. 206.223.0125 www.svrdesign.com tw. @svrdesign fb. www.facebook.com/svrdesign •SvR Design Company's Confidentiality Notice and Permitted Use: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential,proprietary and/or privileged information, as well as content subject to copyright and other intellectual property laws. If you are not the 1 intended recipient,you may not disclose, use, copy or distribute this email message or its attachments. if you believe you have received this email message in error,please contact the sender by reply email and immediately delete this email and destroy any copies. Prior to use of this email message or its attachments, the intended recipient agrees to SvR's terms of Use for intellectual property • located at http://www.svrdesign.com/termsofuse.htm/.Any such use indicates recipient's acceptance of the above statements and conditions of permitted use without exception. From: Hebe Bernardo [mailto:HBernardoCa)Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:49 PM To: Robert McCadden Cc: Ronald Straka; Dave Rodgers; Patty Buchanan; 'Grace Kim' Subject: RE: Sunset Regional Stormwater Facility - RHA Coordination Thank you for your email. It seems that a connection to elevation 332.5 is feasible. Great news. We will need the following: 1. Clarification on whether or not Bldg. 14, 16, 17 triggers a flow control facility. Yes, when areas are calculated using the preliminary site plan, Bldg. 14, 16, 17 trigger flow control. The current site plan would create approximately 11,760 sf of new impervious surface and replace approximately 4,800 sf of existing impervious surface. 2. In the event that a flow control facility is not required for Bldg. 14, 16, 17, we will need clarification on whether or RHA will route flows from Bldg. 14, 16, 17 through the regional facility. N/A, flow control is required. 3. Targeted areas for the sizing of flow control facility. We are considering to use the maximum allowed by zoning minus 10-percent (to account for the flow control BMPs) Please see the table below for proposed surfaces coverages based upon the current Site Plan (received 10/2/13). • Impervious Surface (ac) Lawn (ac) Piha Site 0.68 0.42 Node site 0.38 0.15 Thank you and please let me know if you have any questions. From: Robert McCadden [mailto:robertmCdsvrdesign.com] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 7:13 AM To: Hebe Bernardo Cc: Ronald Straka; Dave Rodgers; Patty Buchanan; 'Grace Kim' Subject: RE: Sunset Regional Stormwater Facility - RHA Coordination Hello Hebe, The elevation at the point of connection (POC)to the regional infiltration facility, shown on our coordination sketches, was determined assuming standard design practices for the storm drainage system and using the limited topographical survey and schematic site plans which have been provided. A partial list of the assumptions used to determine the elevation at the POC are as follows: • 5.3' drop from rim to IE out of on-site treatment facilities. This was based on a 4'6" drop requirement for a Contech Stormfilter vault and included an additional 0.8' of drop to take into consideration unforeseen site conditions. • 2% slope of all storm drain service lines and storm mains. . • Service drains have an IE 1'above the crown of the storm main at the Property line. When these assumptions are applied, the resulting IE at the POC to the regional facility is 327.0+/-. 2 You have indicated that IE of 332.5' at the POC is desired by the City. Currently, in order to connect to the regional infiltration facility at this elevation the design assumptions would need to be modified. A summary of the elevation • gains that could be achieved by revising the design assumptions are as follows: • If Catchbasin Stormfilters were utilized on-site for treatment,the drop assumption of 5.3' could be reduced to 2.3' for a net gain of 3' of elevation. • If the slope of the service drains were reduced from 2%to 1%, and elevation gain of 3.5' could be achieved for the Piha Site and an elevation gain of 1.2' could be achieved for the Node Site. • If the IE of the service drain at the property line was reduced from 1' above the crown of the storm main to 0.0' above the storm main, and elevation gain of 1' could be achieved. Additional options for connecting into the regional facility at a higher elevation include only routing non pollution generating surfaces to the regional facility and bypassing treatment or only routing the closest portion of each site to the facility. Utilizing either of these last two options would require a more detailed analysis of how we would provided flow control and treatment for runoff not routed to the regional facility. We looked into providing some small scale infiltration facilities on site in order to infiltration runoff from pollution generating areas; however, if the geotechnical recommendations for infiltration are similar to another project we worked on recently in the vicinity, there will be a 20' setback requirement between all structures and the bottom of infiltration facilities that will greatly reduce the feasibility of this option. We are comfortable reducing the treatment drop from 5.3' down to 2.3' which by itself would bring the IE at the POC up to 330. We are also comfortable reducing the slope of on-site service drains down to 1% (provided minimum scouring velocities may be achieved in the pipes) which would give us an additional 3.5' of elevation on the Piha Site and an additional 1.2' of elevation on the Node Site. If modifying these two design assumptions is feasible, we would be able •to connect the Piha site into the regional facility at 332.5' as desired and we would be able to connect the Node site into the facility at 331.2. Given the schematic state of the current site designs, we have reservations making additional compromises to our design assumptions at this time. As the design progresses we will be in a better position to evaluate raising the POC to the regional facility further. Please let us know you thoughts after you and your consultants have a chance to review this information. Regards, Robert McCadden, E.I.T. I civil designer SvR Design Company 1205 Second Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98101 t. 206.223.0326 ext. 1038 f. 206.223,0125 www.svrdesign.com tw. @svrdesign fb. www.facebook.com/svrdesign SvR Design Company's Confidentiality Notice and Permitted Use: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential,proprietary and/or privileged information, as well as content subject to copyright and other intellectual property laws. If you are not the intended recipient,you may not disclose, use, copy or distribute this email message or its attachments. If you believe you have received this email message in error,please contact the sender by reply email and immediately delete this email and destroy any copies. Prior to use of this email message or its attachments, the intended recipient agrees to SvR's terms of Use for intellectual property .located at http://www.svrdesign.com/termsofuse.htm/.Any such use indicates recipient's acceptance of the above statements and conditions of permitted use without exception. From: Hebe Bernardo [mailto:HBernardo(sj)Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:15 AM 3 To: Robert McCadden; Dave Rodgers; Patty Buchanan Cc: Ronald Straka Subject: RE: Sunset Regional Stormwater Facility - RHA Coordination Good morning, • Attached please see diagram showing preliminary elevations of the Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility. As you can see,the invert bottom of the facility is at 332.00. 1 was looking at the files received on 9/12, and the proposed invert (connecting from the PIHA site to the regional facility) is shown at 327.00. 5-feet lower than the bottom of the regional facility. What we are hoping for, is that if water quality treatment is provided on-site,the project connects to the regional facility to an elevation no lower than 332.5. Can you please provide clarification on whether or not a connection to an elevation no lower than 332.5 can be made? Thank you for all your help in this process and please let me know if you have any questions. From: Hebe Bernardo Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 8:40 AM To: 'Robert McCadden' Cc: Ronald Straka; Dave Rodgers; Patty Buchanan Subject: RE: Sunset Regional Stormwater Facility - RHA Coordination Good morning. Thank you for your email and the information provided. I have a minor question in the area summary provided. On the PIHA site, there is a difference of around 4,000sf increase in areas from the pre-dev to the dev condition (totals are shown equally). Can you please verify the areas and let me • know the outcome? I will very much appreciate it. It seems like this will be a good time to have another conference call (half an hour or so)to discuss whether or not the projects will trigger the flow control facility requirement, and go over the next steps to follow. Below please see Ron's and I availability for the next few days. • September 19,from 9;00-10;00 and from 1;00-2;00 • September 24,from 9;00-11;00 and from 1;00-4;00 • September 25, from 9;00-11;00 and from 1;00-4;00 • September 26,from 9;00-12;00, from 1;00-2;00, and from 2:30-4:00 Please let me know the time that works best for you. Thank you and feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Best regards, ffoa, C 16012Zc`ado Civil Engineer II City of Renton I Public Works Department I Surface Water Utility 1055 S. Grady Way 15th Floor I Renton, WA 98057 V: Direct Office 425.430.7264 L: Direct Fax 425.430.7241 ®: hbernardo(cilrentonwa.00v • 4 • From: Robert McCadden [mailto:robertmCabsvrdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:02 AM To: Hebe Bernardo Cc: Ronald Straka; Dave Rodgers; Patty Buchanan Subject: RE: Sunset Regional Stormwater Facility - RHA Coordination Hi Hebe, Per your request, please lease find the following documents attached: • Project Land Cover for Stormwater Calculations.pdf • SST SD Coordination Sketch 1.pdf • SST SD Coordination Sketch 2.pdf The "Project Land Cover for Stormwater Calculations" document provides areas and land coverages for use in sizing the regional infiltration facility and the SD coordination sketches contain preliminary storm drain routing to the regional infiltration facility from both the Piha and Bldg. 14, 16, 17 sites. The routing shown on the SD coordination sketch result in an invert elevation at the infiltration facility of 327 +/- if 100%of the runoff from both sites is conveyed to the regional facility. In addition to the sketches, we have also evaluated the use of flow control BMPs on-site. When laying out BMP facilities, we assumed a 20' setback requirement between any infiltrating facility and any property line or structure. The •20' setback was a requirement given to us by a geotechnical engineer while working on a similar project in the vicinity. BMPs selected for the proposed sites are as follows: • Piha Site—1,100sf pervious pavement • Bldg. 14, 16, 17—2,275 sf pervious pavement and 200 sf of bioretention planter(raingarden) Please let us know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robert McCadden, E.I.T. I civil designer SvR Design Company 1205 Second Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98101 t. 206.223.0326 ext. 1038 f. 206.223.0125 www.svrdesign.com tw. @svrdesign fb. www.facebook.com/svrdesign SvR Design Company's Confidentiality Notice and Permitted Use: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential,proprietary and/or privileged information, as well as content subject to copyright and other intellectual property laws. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, copy or distribute this email message or its attachments. If you believe you have received this email message in error,please contact the sender by reply email and immediately delete this email and destroy any copies. •Prior to use of this email message or its attachments, the intended recipient agrees to SvR's terms of Use for intellectual property located at ht_tp://www.svrdesign.com/termsofuse.htm/.Any such use indicates recipient's acceptance of the above statements and conditions of permitted use without exception. 5 From: Hebe Bernardo [mai Ito:HBernardoCcbRentonwa.gov] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 3:55 PM To: Dave Rodgers; Robert McCadden; Patty Buchanan Cc: Ronald Straka • Subject: RE: Sunset Regional Stormwater Facility - RHA Coordination Thank you for the call today and for discussing the project with us. I look forward to working with you in the design of this project. Attached please see the pre-design report. The pre-design report includes two projects: Harrington Ave NE Green Connection's Project and Sunset Regional Stormwater Facility. Please contact me if you have any questions. Best regards, floc, C 160=4vdo Civil Engineer II City of Renton I Public Works Department I Surface Water Utility 1055 S. Grady Way 15th Floor Renton, WA 98057 W: Direct Office 425.430.7264 ,: Direct Fax 425.430.7241 ®: hbernardo(cDrentonwa.00v W+R^' From: Dave Rodgers [mailto:daver(cIsvrdesign.com] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 2:41 PM To: Hebe Bernardo Cc: Robert McCadden; Patty Buchanan Subject: RE: Sunset Regional Stormwater Facility - RHA Coordination We can call you if you and Ron will be together. Thanks SvR Design Company's Confidentiality Notice and Permitted Use: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential,proprietary and/or privileged information, as well as content subject to copyright and other intellectual property laws. If you are not the intended recipient you may not disclose, use, copy or distribute this email message or its attachments. If you believe you have received this email message in error,please contact the sender by reply email and immediately delete this email and destroy any copies. Prior to use of this email message or its attachments, the intended recipient agrees to SvR's terms of Use for intellectual property located at http://www.svrdesign.com/termsofuse.htmi.Any such use indicates recipient's acceptance of the above statements and conditions of permitted use without exception. From: Hebe Bernardo [mai Ito:HBernardo(@Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 2:25 PM To: Dave Rodgers Cc: Robert McCadden; Patty Buchanan . Subject: RE: Sunset Regional Stormwater Facility - RHA Coordination Hi my meeting got canceled. I will be available at 2:45. Is there a phone number I can call? I will have Ron Straka join us in the conversation. Thanks a lot. 6 Best regards, •ffohl 6 50=ardo Civil Engineer II City of Renton I Public Works Department I Surface Water Utility 1055 S. Grady Way 15th Floor I Renton, WA 98057 2: Direct Office 425.430.7264 Direct Fax 425.430.7241 ®: hbernardo6a rentonwa.gov ol From: Dave Rodgers [mailto:daver(asvrdesign.com] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 1:37 PM To: Hebe Bernardo Cc: Robert McCadden; Patty Buchanan Subject: RE: Sunset Regional Stormwater Facility - RHA Coordination Hi Hebe, Would 2:45 work for you for a conf. call? Thanks -dave SvR Design Company's Confidentiality Notice and Permitted Use: •This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain confidential,proprietary and/or privileged information, as well as content subject to copyright and other intellectual property laws. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, copy or distribute this email message or its attachments. If you believe you have received this email message in error,please contact the sender by reply email and immediately delete this email and destroy any copies. Prior to use of this email message or its attachments, the intended recipient agrees to SvR's terms of Use for intellectual property located at htto://www.svrdesign.com/termsofuse.htm/.Any such use indicates recipient's acceptance of the above statements and conditions of permitted use without exception. From: Hebe Bernardo [mailto:HBernardo(a)Rentonwa.gov] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 7:45 AM To: Dave Rodgers Subject: Sunset Regional Stormwater Facility - RHA Coordination Good morning. I'm following up with my voicemail. My name is Hebe Bernardo and I am the project manager for the regional infiltration stormwater facility to be constructed in the Sunset Park. It is my understanding that RHA is working with you on the stormwater part of the project. Im interested in having a conversation with you on the drainage requirements for buildings 13-17, , and the possibility of using the regional stormwater facility(if needed)for flow control mitigation and water quality treatment. We need to move forward with the design of this project and I will very much appreciate some of your time to go over some items. I'm available most day today, out of the office on Monday and in the rest of next week. My contact information is below.Thank you so much for all your help in this project and please let me know if you have any questions. Best regards, hro G' Byrn rdo Civil Engineer II City of Renton I Public Works Department I Surface Water Utility 7 1055 S. Grady Way 15th Floor Renton, WA 98057 S: Direct Office 425.430.7264 8: Direct Fax 425.430.7241 ®: hbernardo(cDrentonwa.00v • 8 • "targeted" areas draining to the regional stormwater facility Water quality treatment to be provided on-site? Confirmation (though sizing calculations) that flow control for the NODE property is not needed Confirmation that • • t Hebe Bernardo • From: Ronald Straka Sent: Wednesday,June 05, 2013 7:56 AM To: Hebe Bernardo Subject: FW: RHA alternative location of replacement housing townhomes_ list of conditions/assumptions Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Categories: Red Category FYI—RHA's proposal is to move the housing to the PIHA site and not have them in the park, but the stormwater issues to remain? From: Erika Conkling Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 4:39 PM To: Leslie A Betlach; Terry Higashiyama; Ronald Straka Cc: Chip Vincent; Rocale Timmons; Mark Santos-Johnson Subject: RE: RHA alternative location of replacement housing townhomes _ list of conditions/assumptions I think you misunderstand, Leslie. •The proposal is to move the housing off the park and onto the PIHA lot. This would allow significantly more park space. Erika Conkling, AICP Senior Planner City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development 1055 S. Grady Way — D OUU Renton, WA 98057 D (425)430-6578 voice (425)430-7300 fax l V econkling@rentonwa.gov �D arux!s '[`1v P1 tA 19 — V From: Leslie A Betlach Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 4:38 PM1 h}(— d Q/LQ- c� -{�f, 0-N✓1 To: Terry Higashiyama; Ronald Straka Inv cy- Ae'd Cc: Chip Vincent; Rocale Timmons; Erika Conkling; Mark Santos-Johnson Subject: FW: RHA alternative location of replacement housing townhomes_ list of conditions/assumptions Terry and Ron, I see that you weren't copied on this revised proposal (below). I don't know the size implications/park impacts of the proposal to allow buildings 14, 16, 17 (shown below) and the Piha site to convey stormwater into the new regional stormwater facility planned for under the Sunset Terrace park— assuming that the facility can be expanded, at RHA's expense, to cover the additional capacity. • I also don't know the size implications to the raingardens and the stormwater facility to allow use of stormwater bioretention swales to help convey the surface water from buildings 14, 16, 17 and Piha to the new regional stormwater facility. 1 n The future park is being reduced from all directions and at some point it may be wise to just grass it over. There are policy implications to allow what RHA is requesting for stormwater -which can translate to other projects in • this vicinity. I am hoping we are able to meet on this sooner than later. Our landscape consultant is ready to start and I am holding off on issu eing the Notice to Proceed. Thanks Leslie Ze>4. Eedad Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98057 Ibetlach@rentonwa.gov Phone: 425-430-6619 M From: Mark R. Gropper [mailto:mrg(arentonhousing.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 4:16 PM To: Leslie A Betlach; Rocale Timmons; Erika Conkling; Mark Santos-Johnson Cc: Chip Vincent; graceCabschemataworkshop.com; danl(asheiterresourcesinc.com; Jill Richardson; Bruce Sharpe; Owen Mayfield Subject: RHA alternative location of replacement housing townhomes_ list of conditions/assumptions Leslie, Rocale, Erika, and Mark: Thank you, for meeting with our team last month to further discuss options for the development of the planned Sunset Terrace townhomes which, as you know, are part of the replacement public housing units for Sunset Terrace. After listening to the various perspectives, concerns and suggestions discussed at the meeting, our team worked to identify a more optimal way to proceed for all concerned—to both address RHA's housing needs and to maximize and enhance the space for the new Sunset Park. We have identified an option which, if acceptable to the City, we think will help us move forward with a better housing design and a better and larger park. We have outlined below some guiding principles for our proposal, along with some conditions which we need to work with the City to address to make this alternative plan possible. Guiding principles: The Sunset Terrace replacement housing townhomes, the new Sunset Terrace park, market rate housing, and infrastructure must all be developed to a high-level of compatible proximity, function, esthetics, and cost feasibility. • Not the least of our considerations is the need for privacy and defensible space to be enjoyed by the RHA townhome residents (without feeling impinged upon by users of the park), AND parking (as we heard again last night from 2 councilwoman Marcy Palmer, concerned about the availability of parking for the library and park visitors). We also value the importance of an easily accessible,visible and good-sized neighborhood park. • Therefore, RHA's development team has decided to explore the wisdom in moving the replacement housing townhomes (buildings 13 and 15 shown below and attached) off of the Sunset Terrace property to the adjacent 1.09 acre site owned by RHA on the northeastern side of 10th NE (parcel 7227801785 also shown below and attached). If acceptable to the City and RHA, this would free-up the entire land inside of Sunset Lane for the new Sunset Park. With the City's support to address the conditions related to our proposed alternative (described below),we think this could be a great win-win solution. Informally referred to by staff as the "Piha" site (since RHA purchased the property from the Piha family), this property was the subject of an earlier accord reached by RHA and Providence Health and Services for the development of a HUD funded Section 202 senior housing building. This project was predicated upon the inclusion of a Program for the All- inclusive Care of the Elderly (a PACE Services Center). Unfortunately, federal funding and capital have yet to materialize for this Providence project known as the John Gabriel House. I talked with the Providence housing development director Tim Zaricznyj about the potential of instead locating the senior housing and PACE Center on the RHA-owned 1.28 acre central office property at 2900 NE 10th St. I proposed a partnership whereby RHA offices would occupy approximately 10,000 s.f. of a newly constructed mixed-use building, adjacent to the PACE Center, and 70 units of senior housing above. This plan, positively received by Tim, makes available the Piha lot for the Sunset Terrace replacement townhomes. We will further pursue the John Gabriel House option at 2900 NE 10th with Providence as funds become available in the future. To achieve its housing objectives RHA contemplates for the Piha site one alley loaded row of approximately seven 3-BR townhomes, with a second set of seven 3-BR townhomes backed, by a multifamily low-rise with 1 and 2-1311 flats, where parking could be located at grade under the multifamily flats. As one of RHA's primary conditions to this alternative townhomes location, the agency will need to have a workable site plan for the Piha property confirmed via a pre-application session with the City of Renton. With the City's affirmation that this alternative warrants exploration, RHA will expend the time and money to develop schematic materials sufficient for a pre-application meeting in July 2013. A second condition will be for the City to allow buildings 14, 16, 17 (also shown below) and Pih ite to convey stormwater into the new regional stormwater facility planned for under the Sunset Terrace par —assuming that the facility can be expanded, at RHA's expense, to cover the additional capacity. A third condition will be for the City to allow use of stormwater bioretention swales to help convey the surface water from buildings 14, 16, 17 and Piha to the new regional stormwater facility. We believe the use of bioretention swales is a public benefit that exemplifies the low-impact development our City encourages. Clearly, moving the townhomes off the proposed park site allows for greater park design flexibility,view corridors, street parking along the length of Sunset Lane (if needed or desired), and enjoyment of an expanded park setting by the surrounding residents and patrons. Your thoughtful review and response to our mutually evolving plans is appreciated. Thanks for your collaboration and support. We look forward to discussing this option with the larger group at our Sunset Terrace Community Investment Strategy Implementation meeting next Tuesday. —Mark— Mark Gropper 9(Executive Director . 3 2900 NE 10th Street, PO Box 2316, Renton WA 98056-0316, Phone 425-226-1850 x.223 DISCLAIMER: This message is confidential,intended only for the named recipient(s)and may contain information that is privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.If you • are not the intended recipient(s),you are notified that the dissemination,distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited.If you received this message in error,please notify the sender then delete this message. t�t �1�4—# r Z 4 ` •�^ ���� e'' m ��r "�� � � �� � Via `ins e W ,�F Ally Y a tot Ln two oil 2 lit fM RN GTC04 AVE �k x 3 � •• yjYn�1�� ♦ ,� Y n�' •�0�•» 4 �fi�r` £''"��` � a v, z �p N • VAOIA'i- s- r rn urc <� avL� 4uo J � vv c n<c d �ltn g ���-►��. �b C*w YDv� c a bT?r J AU w 4S 4wn �Aw � i • • 'r 4 Private RC w �aF t w po tiS 4a S NE 1101h N NE 101h St z z NE 9th pi Aly NE 91h P! a 0 Femd Clr NE 3 a«4k,w Ph— ViMi1sA E BuWtiry P1 iB �P2 0 100 200 300 400 �r �s G -Sbeetx Feet iso arrrN '�'""'i�ah+riw,ivcg4, Figure 3.17-1 Fireflow Phasing—Potential Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Area Community Planned Action Final NEPA/SEPA EIS Planned Action Ordinance 67 Attachment B:Mitigation Document schemata workshop 3 % PROGRAM OPTION 3A 57 UNITS TOTAL � - 1 BEDROOM FLAT 25 UNITS ��� _ 2 BEDROOM FLAT o�SF�gsTFCi 16 UNITS � qC,�- 'YF f :f �°�� �~` , 3 BEDROOM TO WNHOME Piha WQ Facility 16UNITS f Y Rim = 345 I E = 339.7 COMMUNITY SPACE o. PARKING Cl) Fo _O no a r Q J Pal i \ 4 I a _ Connect to regional ' g New storm line fromw ` infiltration Facility. bldg. 14,16,17 site. See sketch 2 I +/- • 13015 t , LARGEDSITEPLAN-3A _. _ �13DView-3A SST 9-12-13 0' 30' 60' 90' SUNSET TERRACE REGIONAL INFILTRATION FACILITY COORDINATION SKETCH 1/2 SvR Design Co. schemata wor 12 Copyright Schemata Workshop,Inc. wwwschemata 1 1 .................................................................. GLENWOOD AVE € 9 1qj D / s i _ T _ D I i _� hI D D Bldg. 14, 16, 17 ' WQ Facility I Rim = 343 +/- I IE = 337.7 +/1 1 I I I I I I I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ H R � NGT ON AVE I I 1 I I I I I I 7 New storm line Connect to regional from Piha site. —� infiltration facility. See sketch 1. IE = 327.0 13015 SST 9-12-13 SUNSET TERRACE REGIONAL INFILTRATION FACILITY COORDINATION SKETCH 2/2 SvR Design Co. Sunset Terrace DESIGN COMPANY Project No.13015 Project Land Cover for Stormwater Calculations Designed By:FM Date:9/12/13 Checked By:DR Page 1 of 1 QC By: SCOPE Please find preliminary site coverage take offs for the Renton Housing Authority Sunset Terrace Piha and Building 14, 16, & 17 sites below. The information in the table is provided for use in determining the Project's flow control and water quality requirements and for use in sizing a regional detention facility. RESULTS Piha Site Predeveloped Developed Predeveloped Developed On-Site 'On-Site ROW ROW Pervious Grass 43,317 13,631 3200 3200 s Impervious s 0 33,686 9328 9328 Totals 43, 317 4aIT7 , I 12,528 12,528 PGIS (sf, 0 8,850 4,748 4,748 included in impervious area and total above Buildin 1 Predeveloped Developed Predeveloped Developed On-Site On-Site ROW ROW Pervious Grass 17,138 6,523 7,004 2,807 s Impervious s 5,736 16,351 6,169 10,366 Totals 22,874 22,874 13,173 13,173 PGIS (sf, 975(existing 5,750 6,169 (all 8,316 (all included in driveways) (parking and impervious is pollution impervious area driveway) pollution generating and total above) generating) minus 5' walk around site on 3 sides Coverage areas do not reflect flow control BMP sizing credits for pervious pavement and bioretention facilities. G:\13c\1301Sc SST\Design\Area Takeoff for Storm Model\Coverage Areas for Storm Modeling.doc Analysis to determine if flow control facilities are required for the PIHA site and for Buildings 14,16 &17 PIHA Site predeveloped developed pervious 46517 1.067883379 16831 0.386387 impervious 9328 14 43014 0.987466 Total 55845 1.282024793 59845 1.373852 Peak and flow frequencies 100-year peak .3231 0.544 >0.1 cfs flow control required Diff 0.221 Buildings 14,16&17 , predeveloped developed pervious 24142 0.554224059 9330 0.214187 impervious 11905 0.273301194 26717 0.613338 Total 36047 0.827525253 36047 0.827525 Peak and flow frequencies analysis 100-year peak 0.2461 0.331 <0.1 cfs flow control NOT Diff 708-5-1 required 4a� o - t C 1 r t C C r r l La o z F WOf W o I�" % <� �L N 336•G DX oUER.T-Lo-) u� C f3 ra rrl� A-D -FC S-rRuCTu12 b8 ' U TCIL/T' T'i pi C"1 L. S'uC"T►o-j J - �CCSS MAl 0r )�C N p�cct- �ovs (,�Cor�sf�vc h csr, cam � 60 4D —Wtt C� —���tIG -�J Ccrr�lvucfi� . - U�'YjGr Va'h vC. cw-, 1 Plan View A 'go Q ,�� ° sue ° Block &j.., L�aavel 4. J � ' Section A — A gbck Wire Screen or Filter Fabric Gra+rol I°lactd111-� � Ponding Height F Z , , lro inlet ' Notes: 1. Drop inlet sedi ent barriers are to be used for small,nearly level drainage areas.(less than 5%) 2. Excavate a sin of sufficient size adjacent to the drop inlet. 3.The top of a structure(ponding height)must be well below the ground elevation downslope to prevent runoff from ypassing the inlet. A temporary dike may be necessary on the downslope side of the structure. Figure 4.14—Block and Gravel Filter ' September 2010 Snohomish County Drainage Manual Volume/1-Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 97 • RENTON SUNSET PLAN ACTION EIS PROJECT DATE: 10/10/2012 REGIONAL FACILITIES PROJECT NO.:437060 ORDER OF MAGNITUDE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE BY:C Moore REVIEW BY:R Chung TOTAL UNIT TOTAL DESCRIPTION OTY UNIT COST COST Infiltration Gallery Excavation 2,535 CY $7.68 $19,475 Waste 1,455 CY $14.41 $20,966 Native Backfill 1,080 CY $9.37 $10,125 Bioretention Soil 285 CY $41.41 $11,802 Drain Rock 1,170 CY $39.32 $46,001 Geotextile 2,500 SY $3.00 $7,500 Seeding 1,140 SY $3.76 $4,282 Landscaping 570 SY $25.00 $14,250 8"Perforated Pipe 900 LF $17.83 $16,045 Cleanout 3 EA $350.00 $1,050 CB Type 2,48"dia 2 EA $2,221.59 $4,443 Birdcage Overflow Structure(CB Type 2,48"dia) 1 EA $3,221.72 $3,222 Misc.Detail Allowance 1 LS $15,916.02 $15,916 Infiltration Gallery Subtotal $175,076 Coveyance Line Excavation 924 CY $7.68 $7,095 Waste 924 CY $14,41 $13,308 Pipe Bed and Zone 461 CY $40.98 $18,902 Imported Backfill above Bed and Zone 394 CY $36,66 $14,434 12"RCP Storm Drain 40 LF $43.02 $1,721 18"RCP Storm Drain 1,030 LF $57.29 $59,010 CSBC(6"layer) 99 CY $37.97 $3,766 • Sawcutting 1,260 LF $3.50 $4,410 Asphalt Demo over pipe trench 595 SY $9.15 $5,442 Asphalt Patching over pipe,6"depth 203 TON $120.00 $24,419 CB Type 2,48"dia 7 .EA $2,221.59 $15,551 Flow Control Structure,72"CB Type 2 1 EA $7,812.55 $7,813 CB Type 1 3 EA $763.87 $2,292 Tie into existing line 3 EA $1,253.39 $3,760 Traffic Control for Pipe in Roadway 10 DAY $620.34 $6,203 Misc.Detail Allowance 1 LS $18,192.01 $18,192 Conveyance Line Subtotal $206,715 SUBTOTAL $381,392 MOB,BONDS,INSUR,TEMP.FACIL,DEMOB,ETC 10.0% $38,139 SUBTOTAL $419,531 CONTINGENCY 30.0% $125,859 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL(ROUNDED) $545,000 SALES TAX 9.5% $51,775 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL(ROUNDED) $597,000 Low range -30.0% $420,000 High Range 50.0% $900,000 NOTE: The above cost opinion is in October 2012 dollars and does not include future escalation, financial or O&M costs. The cost opinion shown has been prepared for guidance in project evaluation from the information available at the time of preparation. The final costs of the project will depend on actual labor and material costs,actual site conditions,productivity,competitive market conditions,final project scope,final schedule and other variable factors. As a result,the final project costs will vary from those presented above. Because of these factors,funding needs must be carefully reviewed prior to making specific financial decisions or establishing final budgets. project scope,final schedule and other variable factors. As a result,the final project costs will vary from those presented above. Because of these factors,funding needs must be carefully reviewed . prior to making specific financial decisions or establishing final budgets. t . E1-2012 • CAG-13-021 ENGINEERING ANNUAL CONSULTANT AGREEMENT 22 THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into on this -5t day of by and between the CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON,A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HEREINAFT CALLED THE"CITY," and CH2MHILL Engineers, Inc.whose address is 1100 112th Ave NE Suite 400 Bellevue,WA 98004, at which work will be available for inspection, hereinafter called the"CONSULTANT." PROJECT NAME:Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility WHEREAS, the City has not sufficient qualified engineering employees to provide the engineering within a reasonable time and the City deems it advisable and is desirous of engaging the professional services and assistance of a qualified professional consulting firm to do the necessary engineering work for the project,and WHEREAS,the Consultant has represented and by entering into this Agreement now represents,that it is in full compliance with the statutes of the State of Washington for registration of professional engineers, has a current valid corporate certificate from the State of Washington or has a valid assumed name filing with the Secretary of State and that all personnel to be assigned to the work required under this Agreement are fully qualified to perform the work to which they will be assigned in a competent and professional manner,and that sufficient qualified personnel are on staff or readily available to Consultant to staff this Agreement. • WHEREAS,the Consultant has indicated that it desires to do the work set forth in the Agreement upon the terms and conditions set forth below. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions,covenants and performances contained herein below, the parties hereto agree as follows: I SCOPE OF WORK The Consultant shall furnish,and hereby warrants that it has,the necessary equipment, materials,and professionally trained and experienced personnel to facilitate completion of the work described in Exhibit A,Scope of Work, which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. The Consultant shall perform all work described in this Agreement in accordance with the latest edition and amendments to local and state regulations,guidelines and policies. The Consultant shall prepare such information and studies as it may deem pertinent and necessary,in order to pass judgment in a sound engineering manner on the features of the work. The Consultant shall make such minor changes, amendments or revisions in the detail of the work as may be required by the City. This item does not constitute an "Extra Work" item as related in Section VIII of the Agreement. The work shall be verified for accuracy by a complete check by the Consultant. The Consultant will be held responsible for the accuracy of the work, even though the work has been accepted by the City. 11 • DESIGN CRITERIA The City will designate the basic premises and criteria for the work needed. Reports and plans,to the extent feasible, shall be developed in accordance with the latest edition and amendments of local and State regulations, guidelines, and specifications, including, but not limited to the following: Page 1 of 25 E 1-2012 • 1. Washington State Department of Transportation/American Public Works Association (WSDOT/APWA), "Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction," as amended by Renton Standard Specification. 2. WSDOT/APWA, "Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction." 3. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Highway Design Manual." 4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges." 5. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Bridge Design Manual,Volumes 1 and 2." 6. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Manual of Highways Hydraulics,"except hydrologic analysis as described in item 14. 7. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Materials Laboratory Outline." 8. Transportation Research Board, "Highway Capacity Manual." 9. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways." 10. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Construction Manual." 11. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Local Agency Guidelines." 12. Standard drawings prepared by the City and furnished to the Consultant shall be used as a guide in all cases where they fit design conditions. Renton Design Standards, and Renton Specifications shall be used as they pertain. 13. Metro Transit,design criteria. 14. King County Surface Water Design Manual,Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1, and Chapters 3,4, and 5. 15. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets." I11 ITEMS TO BE FURNISHED TO THE CONSULTANT BY THE CITY The City will furnish the Consultant copies of documents which are available to the City that will facilitate the preparation of the plans, studies, specifications,and estimates within the limits of the assigned work. All other records needed for the study must be obtained by the Consultant. The Consultant will coordinate with other available sources to obtain data or records available to those agencies. The Consultant shall be responsible for this and any other data collection to the extent provided for in the Scope of Work. City will provide to Consultant all data in City's possession relating to Consultants services on the project. Consultant will reasonably rely upon the accuracy,timeliness, and completeness of the information provided by the City. Should field studies be needed,the.Consultant will perform such work to the extent provided for in the Scope of Work. The City will not be obligated to perform any such field studies. Page 2 of 25 • E1-2012 IV OWNERSHIP OF PRODUCTS AND DOCUMENTS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CONSULTANT Documents,exhibits or other presentations for the work covered by this Agreement shall be furnished by the Consultant to the City upon completion of the various phases of the work. All such material, including working documents, notes, maps,drawings, photo, photographic negatives, etc. used in the project, shall become and remain the property of the City and may be used by it without restriction. Any use of such documents by the City not directly related to the project pursuant to which the documents were prepared by the Consultant shall be without any liability whatsoever to the Consultant. All written documents and products shall be printed on recycled paper when practicable. Use of the chasing-arrow symbol identifying the recycled content of the paper shall be used whenever practicable. All documents will be printed on both sides of the recycled paper,as feasible. All reports,drawings,specifications, documents, and other deliverables of Consultant,whether in hard copy or in electronic form, are instruments of service for this project,whether the project is completed or not. City agrees to indemnify Consultant and Consultant's officers,employees,subcontractors,and affiliated corporations from all claims, damages,losses,and costs,including,but not limited to,litigation expenses and attorney's fees arising out of or related to the unauthorized reuse,change or alteration of these project documents. V • TIME OF BEGINNING AND COMPLETION The work detailed in the Scope of Work will be performed according to Exhibit B,Time Schedule of Completion, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. It is agreed that all the Consultant's services are to be completed and all products shall be delivered by the Consultant unless there are delays due to factors that are beyond the control of the Consultant. The Consultant shall not begin work under the terms of this Agreement until authorized in writing by the City. If, after receiving Notice to Proceed,the Consultant is delayed in the performance of its services by factors that are beyond its control,the Consultant shall notify the City of the delay and shall prepare a revised estimate of the time and cost needed to complete the Project and submit the revision to the City for its approval. Time schedules are subject to mutual agreement for any revision unless specifically described as otherwise herein. Delays attributable to or caused by one of the parties hereto amounting to 30 days or more affecting the completion of the work may be considered a cause for renegotiation or termination of this Agreement by the other party. VI PAYMENT The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter as specified in Exhibit C,Cost Estimate. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor,materials, supplies, equipment,and incidentals necessary to complete the work. All billings for compensation for work performed under this Agreement will list actual time (days and/or hours)and dates during which the work was performed and the compensation shall be figured using the rates in Exhibit C. Payment for this work shall.not exceed$179,003 without a written amendment to this • contract, agreed to and signed by both parties. Cost Plus Net Fee Payment for work accomplished shall be on the basis of the Consultant's actual cost plus a net fee. The actual cost includes direct salary cost,overhead,and direct non-salary cost. ,f-)r E1-2012 • 1. The direct salary cost is the salary expense for professional and technical personnel and principals for the time they are productively engaged in the work necessary to fulfill the terms of this Agreement. The direct salary costs are set forth in the attached Exhibit C and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. 2. The overhead costs as identified on Exhibit C are determined as 149.5 percent of the direct salary cost and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. The overhead cost rate is an estimate based on currently available accounting information and shall be used for all progress payments over the period of the contract. 3. The direct non-salary costs are those costs directly incurred in fulfilling the terms of this Agreement, including, but not limited to travel, reproduction,telephone,supplies, and fees of outside consultants. The direct non-salary costs are specified in Exhibit C,Cost Estimate. Billings for any direct non-salary costs shall be supported by copies of original bills or invoices. Reimbursement for outside consultants and services shall be on the basis of times the invoiced amount. 4. The net fee,which represents the Consultants profit shall be 20 percent of direct salary plus overhead costs. This fee is based on the Scope of Work and the estimated labor hours therein. In the event a supplemental agreement is entered into for additional work by the Consultant,the supplemental agreement will include provision for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The net fee will be prorated and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of the project completed as estimated in the Consultant's monthly progress reports and approved by the City. Any portion of the net fee not • previously paid in the monthly payments shall be included in the final payment,subject to the provisions of Section XI entitled TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. 5. Progress payments may be claimed monthly for direct costs actually incurred to date as supported by detailed statements,for overhead costs and for a proportionate amount of the net fee payable to the Consultant based on the estimated percentage of the completion of the services to date. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the gross amount earned will be made promptly upon its verification by the City after completion and acceptance by the City of the work under this Agreement. Acceptance, by the Consultant of final payment shall constitute full and final satisfaction of all amounts due or claimed to be due. Payment for extra work performed under this Agreement shall be paid as agreed to by the parties hereto in writing at the time extra work is authorized. (Section VIII "EXTRA WORK"). A short narrative progress report shall accompany each voucher for progress payment. The report shall include discussion of any problems and potential causes for delay. To provide a means of verifying the invoiced salary costs for consultant employees,the City may conduct employee interviews. Acceptance of such final payment by the Consultant shall constitute a release of all claims of any nature, related to this Agreement,which the Consultant may have against the City unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the City by the Consultant prior to its acceptance. Said final payment shall not, however, be a bar to any claims that the City may have against the Consultant or to any remedies the City may pursue with respect to such claims. • The Consultant and its subconsultants shall keep available for inspection, by the City,for a period of three years after final payment,the cost records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement and all items related to, or bearing upon,these records. If any litigation,claim or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year retention Dn �f l[ E1-2012 period,the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims or audit findings involving the records have been resolved. The three-year retention period starts when the Consultant receives final payment. VII CHANGES IN WORK The Consultant shall make all such revisions and changes in the completed work of this Agreement as are necessary to correct errors appearing therein, when required to do so by the City,without additional compensation. Should the City find it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed work or parts thereof revised,the Consultant shall make such revisions, if requested and as directed by the City in writing. This work shall be considered as Extra Work and will be paid for as provided in Section VIII. VIII EXTRA WORK The City may desire to have the Consultant perform work or render services in connection with the Project in addition to or other than work provided for by the expressed intent of the Scope of Work. Such work will be considered as Extra Work and will be specified in a written supplement which will set forth the nature and scope thereof. Work under a supplement shall not proceed until authorized in writing by the City. Any dispute as to whether work is Extra Work or work already covered under this Agreement shall be resolved before the work is undertaken. Performance of the work by the Consultant prior to resolution of any such dispute shall waive any claim by the Consultant for compensation as Extra Work. IX EMPLOYMENT The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person,other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant,to solicit or secure this contract and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant,any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee,gifts or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty,the City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration or otherwise recover,the full amount of such fee,commission, percentage, brokerage fee,gift or contingent fee. Any and all employees of the Consultant, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the Consultant under this Agreement, shall be considered employees of the Consultant only and not of the City and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workman's Compensation Act on behalf of said employees,while so engaged and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any negligent act or omission on the part of the Consultant's employees,while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the Consultant. The Consultant shall not engage, on a full or part-time basis, or other basis,during the period of the contract,any professional or technical personnel who are,or have been at any time during the period of this contract,in the employ of the City except regularly retired employees,without written consent of the City. If during the time period of this Agreement,the Consultant finds it necessary to increase its professional,technical, or clerical staff as a result of this work,the Consultant will actively solicit minorities through their advertisement and interview process. Paaa 5 of 25 E1-2012 X NONDISCRIMINATION The Consultant agrees not to discriminate against any client,employee or applicant for employment or for services because of race,creed,color, national origin, marital status,sexual orientation,sex,age or handicap except for a bona fide occupational qualification with regard to, but not limited to the following: employment upgrading; demotion or transfer; recruitment or any recruitment advertising; layoff or termination's; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; selection for training; rendition of services. The Consultant understands and agrees that if it violates this Non-Discrimination provision,this Agreement maybe terminated by the City and further that the Consultant shall be barred from performing any services for the City now or in the future, unless a showing is made satisfactory to the City that discriminatory practices have terminated and that recurrence of such action is unlikely. XI TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time upon not less than ten (10)days written notice to the Consultant,subject to the City's obligation to pay Consultant in accordance with subparagraphs C and D below. B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant,or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project,the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if • the City so chooses. In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in the previous paragraph,should the surviving members of the Consultant,with the City's concurrence,desire to terminate this Agreement, payment shall be made as set forth in Subsection C of this section. C. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City other than for fault on the part of the Consultant, a final payment shall be made to the Consultant for actual cost for the work complete at the time of termination of the Agreement, plus the following described portion of the net fee. The portion of the net fee for which the Consultant shall be paid shall be the same ratio to the total net fee as the work complete is to the total work required by the Agreement. In addition,the Consultant shall be paid on the same basis as above for any authorized extra work completed. No payment shall be made for any work completed after ten(10)days following receipt by the Consultant of the Notice to Terminate. If the accumulated payment made to the Consultant prior to Notice of Termination exceeds the total amount that would be due as set forth herein above,then no final payment shall be due and the Consultant shall immediately reimburse the City for any excess paid. D. In the event the services of the Consultant are terminated by the City for fault on the part of the Consultant,the above stated formula for payment shall not apply. In such an event the amount to be paid shall be determined by the City with consideration given to the actual costs incurred by the Consultant in performing the work to the date of termination,the amount of work originally required which was satisfactorily completed to date of termination,whether that work is in a form or of a type which is usable to the City at the time of termination,the cost to the City of employing another firm to complete the work required and the time which may be required to do so, and other factors which affect the value to the City of the work performed at the time of termination. Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsection exceed the amount which would have been made if the formula set forth in subsection C above had been applied. Pa RP A r)f 7S • E1-2012 E. In the event this Agreement is terminated prior to completion of the work,the original copies of all Engineering plans, reports and documents prepared by the Consultant prior to termination shall become the property of the City for its use without restriction. Such unrestricted use not occurring as a part of this project, shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. F. Payment for any part of the work by the City shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any remedies of any type it may have against the Consultant for any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant,or for failure of the Consultant to perform work required of it by the City. Forbearance of any rights under the Agreement will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to any future act or omission by the Consultant. XII DISPUTES Any dispute concerning questions of facts in connection with work not disposed of by agreement between the Consultant and the City shall be referred for determination to the Public Works Administrator or his/her successors and delegees,whose decision in the matter shall be final and conclusive on the parties to this Agreement. In the event that either party is required to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any of its rights in this Agreement, both parties agree that any such action shall be brought in the Superior Court of the State of Washington,situated in King County at the Maleng Regional Justice Center in Kent, Washington. XIII LEGAL RELATIONS The Consultant shall comply with all Federal Government, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be done under this Agreement. This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of Washington. The Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands or suits at law or equity arising in whole or part from the Consultant's errors, omissions, or negligent acts under this Agreement provided that nothing herein shall require the Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims, demands or suits based upon the conduct of the City, its officers or employees and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of(a)the Consultant's agents or employees and (b)the City, its agents, officers and employees,this provision with respect to claims or suits based upon such concurrent negligence shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence or the negligence of the Consultant's agents or employees. To the maximum extent permitted by law,Consultant's liability for City's damages will not, in the aggregate,exceed $1,000,000. This article takes precedence over any conflicting article of this AGREEMENT or any document incorporated into it or referenced by it. This limitation of liability will apply whether Consultant's liability arises under breach of contract or warranty;tort; including negligence;strict liability; statutory liability; or any other cause of action, and shall include Consultant's officers,affiliated corporations,employees, and subcontractors. Insurance E1-2012 • The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types described below: 1. Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned,hired and leased vehicles.Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office(ISO)form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary,the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises,operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City. 3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional Liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession. B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance -- - — Consultant shall maintain the following insurance limits: • 1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than$1,000,000 each occurrence,$2,000,000 general aggregate. 3. Professional Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than$1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. C. Other Insurance Provision The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they shall be primary insurance as respect to the City. Any Insurance,self-insurance,or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. D. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than ANIL E. Verification of Coverage Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including • but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement,evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work. 0 0-477C • E1-2012 F. Notice of Cancellation The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation,within two business days of their receipt of such notice. G. Failure to Maintain Insurance Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith,with any sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand,or at the sole discretion of the City,offset against funds due the Consultant from the City. The limits of said insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of Consultant hereunder. The Consultant shall also submit copies of the declarations pages of relevant insurance policies to the City within 30 days of contract acceptance if requested. The Certification and Declaration page(s) shall be in a form as approved by the City. If the City's Risk Manager has the Declaration page(s) on file from a previous contract and no changes in insurance coverage has occurred,only the Certification Form will be required. The Consultant shall verify,when submitting first payment invoice and annually thereafter, possession of a current City of Renton business license while conducting work for the City. The Consultant shall require,and provide verification upon request,that all subconsultants participating in a City project possess a current City of Renton business license. The Consultant shall provide,and obtain City approval of, a traffic control plan prior to conducting work in City right-of-way. The Consultant's relation to the City shall be at all times as an independent contractor. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitute the Consultant's waiver of immunity under the Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this agreement. XIV SUBLETTING OR ASSIGNING OF CONTRACTS The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the work covered by this Agreement without the express consent of the City. XV ENDORSEMENT OF PLANS The Consultant shall place their certification on all plans, specifications, estimates or any other engineering data furnished by them in accordance with RCW 18.43.070. XVI OPINIONS OF COST In providing opinions of cost, financial analyses, economic feasibility projections, and schedules for the project,the . Consultant has no control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or maintenance costs; competitive bidding procedures and market conditions; time or quality of performance by third parties; quality, type, management, or direction of operating personnel; and other economic and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate project cost or schedule. Therefore, the Consultant makes no warranty that City's actual project costs, financial aspects, Paee 9 of 25 E1-2012 economic feasibility, or schedules will not vary from the Consultant's opinions, analyses, projections, or estimates. If the City wishes greater assurance as to any element of project cost, feasibility, or schedule, the City will employ an independent cost estimator,Consultant, or other appropriate advisor. XVI I COMPLETE AGREEMENT This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants,stipulations, and provisions agreed upon by the parties. Any supplements to this Agreement will be in writing and executed and will become part of this Agreement. No agent, or representative of either party has authority to make,and the parties shall not be bound by or be liable for,any statement, representation, promise,or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments,or modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as an amendment to this Agreement. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision in this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted. XVlll EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an . original having identical legal effect. The Consultant does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the Request for Qualifications,and the supporting materials submitted by the Consultant, and does hereby accept the Agreement and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT CI MN REN4A� TON ` 3 i Zvi 3 Signature Date Mayor Denis Law Date type or print name ATTEST: Title Bonnie I.Walton, City Clerk � t D—an ofIc • E1-2012 EXHIBIT A City of Renton Sunset Community Low Impact Development Retrofit Project— Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility I. Background The City of Renton completed and adopted the Sunset Community Plan and Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement which evaluated potential impacts of redevelopment in the Sunset area and required infrastructure. As part of this effort the City developed and adopted the Sunset Area Surface Water Master Plan which identifies stormwater improvements to convey,treat and infiltrate runoff from the existing and future land cover conditions. Recommended improvements include the following: • New Storm Drainage mains. • Green Connections along Harrington Ave. NE between NE 16th St. and NE 10th St.at locations that fit with existing and planned future land use in the area to provide enhanced basic water quality treatment and flow control. within the right-of-way.The Harrington Ave NE Green Connections will consist of pervious sidewalks and rain gardens. • • A regional storm water infiltration facility consisting construction of an infiltration/flow control facility for flow control mitigation and a rain garden for providing enhanced basic water quality treatment. This scope of work pertains to the design of the proposed Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater facility which will retrofit approximately 3-acres of roadway from the Sunset Boulevard (a high-traffic major arterial) by providing flow control and enhanced and basic water quality treatment prior to discharging into Johns Creek. The regional facility will consist of rain gardens and an infiltration gallery with potential additional detention capacity for attenuation of high flows.The facility is co-located with a proposed new park in the Sunset Terrace area to compliment the park features and serve as a demonstration project to the public using low impact development to treat stormwater runoff. This scope will prepare construction documents(plans, specifications and construction cost estimate)for the Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility.Tasks included in this scope of work include data collection,survey and basemap preparation, permitting support,final design of the facility, preparation of a technical information report, public outreach support,services during bidding, and project management as defined in the tasks below. Services for during construction and construction management are not included in this scope of work and would be included in a separate amendment. II. DESIGN CRITERIA The City will designate the basic premises and criteria for the design. In addition,design reports and plans,to the extent feasible, shall be developed in accordance with the latest edition of the following documents: • 1- Washington State Department of Transportation/American Public Works Association (WSDOT/ APWA),Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge,and Municipal Construction 2010 edition 2. City of Renton Transportation Standard Specifications. ❑� �� .fIS E1-2012 • 3. 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 KCSWDM. 2005 Low Impact Development Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound or current version as applicable. 4. Measurements will be in English units 5.• Drafting Standards: City of Renton. o Vertical Datum: NAVD 88 o Horizontal Datum: NAD 83191 III. Compliance with the FY 2012 Statewide Stormwater Grant Program—Proviso Funding Agreement Design reports and plans,shall be developed in accordance with Task 2,design plans and specifications under Grant Agreement Number G1200544. Task 1. Project Management Perform project management,administration,and coordination of work effort involved in all phases and tasks. This task will continue throughout the duration of the project. It will include the work necessary to develop the project management plan, set up financial accounting including subconsultants, develop and implement quality • management plan(QMP),overall project coordination with the CITY and project team,and project closeout. Invoices and progress reports will be provided to the CITY on a monthly basis. Monthly progress reports will include a summary of work performed by the CONSULTANT for that period and the work anticipated to be completed in the next period. This task includes a project kick-off meeting at the CITY with two (2) CONSULTANT attendees, assuming two (2) hours in length. QA/QC: Consultant shall conduct internal quality control regarding collection of data, surveying, basemap preparation and hydraulic modeling and all other tasks. Task 1 Deliverables • Monthly Invoices and progress reports • Bi-weekly phone call or email check-ins with the City project manager to report project status Task 1 Assumptions • Project duration is assumed to be a 16 month project duration with a 3-month inactive period where no invoices will be prepared. Project Schedule • Notice to Proceed-January 2013 • 0 30%Design-April 2013 • 60%Design—July 2013 • 90%design—October 2013 0 100%Design—November 2013 iE1-2012 Task 2.Supplemental Survey The CONSULTANT will perform Survey as needed to supplement survey conducted under separate contract through Renton Housing Authority. Task 2.1 Supplemental Survey It is assumed that during the design phase,some level of supplemental survey may be necessary as the design progresses.The CONSULTANT will perform supplemental surveys as needed for purposes such as private property match/conforms, locating additional utility features and pothole locations, structures and elevations, or to obtain features requiring more definition for design purposes. For budgeting purposes this task item has been estimated not to exceed 10-field crew hours.Any costs for performing additional survey beyond 10-field crew hours,will require authorization by supplemental agreement. Task 2.2 Utility locations and potholing: The CONSULTANT will utilize a "One-Call Locate Service"to field locate all major utilities including but not limited to TV,gas, power,telephone, storm,water,sewer,fiber optic,and King County wastewater utilities identified in the street prior to field survey so that these locations can be picked up during the field survey.The CONSULTANT will compare available utility record drawings(As-Build's)against surface evidence of utilities obtained during the initial survey. Critical conflicts of identified utilities with proposed design improvements may require potholing to confirm the utility location and elevation. Potholing will be performed by a Sub-contractor(ADS). All utility potholes will be surveyed and a table of potholing results will be prepared.A field worksheet with location, type of utility, type of • material, diameter of utility depth and measurements from fixed pointes will be provided. Photos of each utility will be included in the potholing information. The CONSULTANT has budgeted up to$5000 for utility potholing,which is assumed to occur within the paved road surface. In the event of unavoidable utility conflicts, the CONSULTANT will provide a list of conflicts to the CITY to notify the applicable utility agency to initiate the relocation of their utility prior to construction by the CITY. Coordination with the CITY and potholing Sub-contractor will be provided prior to the 60 percent plan submittal.Work by subcontractor will include right of way permitting,traffic control backfilling and resurfacing per City of Renton standards. Task 2 Deliverables 1. Updated 1"=20' Design Basemapping in AutoCAD 2012 format. 2. Updated INROADS compatible Digital Terrain Model (DTM),saved in AutoCAD drawing(DWG)format. Task 2 Assumptions 1- Potholes will be backfilled with gravel (with 5/8-inch minus gravel compacted at 8 to 12-inch lifts) and the surface will be patched with like material. Depth of patch material shall match thickness of existing asphalt. One exception is that gas lines will initially be backfilled with 12 inches of sand then followed by gravel per PSE requirements. 2• Subcontractor will be responsible for requesting right of way permit. 3. Subcontractor will submit a traffic control plan to the City 4. One call utility locating service will be called 5• Materials removed from potholing with be disposed of at a permitted diposal site. Also it is assumed that materials are contaminant free. Page 13 of 25 E1-2012 i Task 3. Public Involvement The CONSULTANT will provide support to the CITY for agency,stakeholder,and public consultation and coordination required during the design process. It is anticipated that the CITY will provide the lead in coordinating with stakeholders including RHA,and Parks; however,the following forums are anticipated in this scope: • Public Open House: It is anticipated to have an open house for the community to communicate the proposed project elements,goals and impacts to a broader audience. The CONSULTANT will support this effort by providing informational boards developed from products created under other tasks described in this scope of work and presentation by up to two staff members. Task 3 Deliverables • Two (2) 34x22-inch Boards for use at one (1) Public Open House.Assumed up to one (1)CONSULTANT Staff will attend the Public Open House. Task 3 Public Involvment Assumptions • CITY will organize and host public meetings and provide notifications. CONSULTANT will participate in presentations and support preparation of presentation materials. • CITY will separately contract with a Landscape Architecture firm for design of the park and provide Landscape Architecture support for design of the regional facility. The LA firm will lead development of materials for the Public Open Houses and outreach. Task 4-Hydrologic/Hydraulic Modeling 4.1 Modeling of LID facilities 1. Size rain gardens needed for pre-treatment and to reduce pollution from SR 900 and adjacent streets and property.The consultant will delineate the sub basin areas tributary to the rain garden.The drainage area delineation will include tributary roadway as well as sidewalk, driveways,and pervious areas if applicable. 2. Rain Gardens will be sized per the 2005 DOE manual to filter a minimum of 91 percent of the runoff through bioretention media. 3. Conduct modeling in WWHM or approved equivalent models to size each individual rain garden. 4. Pervious sidewalk subgrade depth will be modeled to infiltrate 100 percent of rainfall. 4.2 Modeling of required conveyance improvements Determine the required pipe size to convey runoff to and from the rain gardens. These pipes will be designed at a minimum in accordance with the criteria specified in Section 1.2.4 of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual to accommodate a 25-year storm event. 4.3 Drainage Technical Information Report CONSULTANT will prepare a Draft and Final Drainage Technical Information Report to reflect the hydrological and • hydraulic conditions of the proposed LID improvements. Page 14 of 25 • E1-2012 Task 4 Deliverables 1• Electronic modeling files, including input and output parameters. 2. Documentation of sizing assumptions, methods, and results to be included in the drainage report 3. Brief memo summarizing model input and assumptions for City review to be submitted at the 30% design level. 4. One (1) hard copy (and electronic copy) of the Draft and Final Technical Information Report at the 60 and 90 percent submittals. Task 5—Finalize Geotechnical Report 1. Under Phase 1 a preliminary geotechnical report was prepared that evaluated the geotechnical considerations. Under Phase 2,geotechnical work includes updating the report to include recommendations for backfill and compaction for the new drainage system; In addition,the work will include consulting on various geotechnical considerations in design including a review of the design with respect to geotechnical considerations 2. Provide conclusions and geotechnical considerations for the following: a. Earthwork and site preparation. Include an evaluation of the site soils for use as structural(i.e., • trench backfill)and gradation criteria for imported fill, as appropriate.This will include an evaluation of the effects of construction equipment on the site soils and mitigation of unsuitable soil conditions. b. Review risk and specifications for potential unintended discovery of underground utilities, abandoned septic tanks,fuel tanks or other hazards potentially remaining after RHA demolition of the site and encountered during construction. c. Comments on any anticipated construction difficulties identified from the results of our side studies Task 5 Deliverables 1- Final Geotechnical Report including design conclusions and recommendations together with detailed site plans and supporting information. 2. Review of Plans and Specifications(in terms of geotechnical considerations) Task 5 Assumptions • Contractor will be responsible for developing shoring plan by an engineer for review by the City. • Final Geotechnical Report will also address recommendations and findings related to the Harrington Avenue NE Green Connections project under separate scope. • • Contractor will be responsible for developing dewatering plan by an engineer for review by the City. Page 15 of 25 E1-2012 • Task 6 Permitting Support The CONSULTANT will provide support to the CITY to identify and provide supporting data for permit applications. The City will be responsible for completing the permit application and obtaining the permit.The CONSULTANT will provide up to 40 hours to support preparation of permit documents. In support of State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)compliance,the Consultant will prepare an Environmental Checklist in support of a land use permit from the City.The checklist will include project information on background and environmental elements (earth, air,water, plants, animals, energy and natural resources,environmental health, land and shoreline use, housing, aesthetics, light and glare, recreation, historic and cultural preservation, transportation, public services, and utilities). Potential permits that may be required for the project are: a) SEPA Checklist,and b) Grading permit. Task 6 Assumptions • The project is covered under the Sunset Area Planned Action EIS and will not require a separate Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) ■ Completion of the Environmental Checklist will rely on information contained in other documents prepared for the project and project design elements(e.g.,temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan,traffic plan,storm water pollution prevention plan,etc.) • ' Some environmental elements will not apply to the project(e.g., housing, light and glare) • The City will sign the Environmental Checklist • The Environmental Checklist will be submitted to the City with the Land Use Permit Application Task 6 Deliverables ' Draft SEPA Environmental Checklist for City review--electronic file in Adobe Acrobat(PDF) file format and one hard copy. ' Final SEPA Environmental Checklist--electronic file in Adobe Acrobat(PDF)file format and one hard copy. Task 7. Final Design,Construction Documents and Cost Estimate Based on the result of the pre-design,the CONSULTANT will then prepare draft Construction Drawings,technical special provisions, and cost estimate representing approximately the 30 percent,60 percent,90 percent and 100 percent completion level for the selected improvement.The CONSULTANT will prepare the contract provisions at the 100 percent completion. Half-size (11"x17")drawings will be submitted to the CITY for review at the 30, 60, 90 and 100 percent.stages.The 60 percent drawings can also be used by the CITY to prepare and submit permit packages. No additional drawings will be prepared by the CONSULTANT for use in permit applications. CONSULTANT will prepare a Draft and Final Technical Information Report to reflect the hydrological and hydraulic • conditions of the proposed LID improvements. Page 16 of 25 • E 1-2012 Task 7 Deliverables 1. Three (3) hard copy sets of half size (11"x17" sheets) draft construction drawings will be submitted to the CITY for review and comment at the 30 percent,60 percent and 90 percent completion level. 2. Three (3) hard copy sets of half-size(11"x17" sheets) construction drawings will be submitted to the CITY at the 100 percent completion level. 3. Three (3) sets of engineer's cost estimate and technical specifications outline will be submitted to the CITY for the 30 percent submittal. 4. Three (3) sets of hard copy of specifications, and summary of quantities including an engineer's cost estimate for the construction documents will be submitted to the CITY for the 60, 90 and 100 percent submittals. 5. Electronic files AutoCAD 2012 format at the end of the project. 6. Submittal documents for compliance with the FY 2012 Statewide Stormwater Grant Program — Proviso Funding Agreement number G1200544. Task 7 Meetings • Two (2) meeting with two (2) CONSULTANT staff and with the CITY staff at the CITY offices to receive and discuss the 30 percent and 60 percent review comments. • One (1) meeting with two (2) CONSULTANT staff and with the CITY staff at the CITY offices to resolve and . coordinate any outstanding issues prior to completion of the 100 percent completion construction documents. Task 7 Assumptions • The CONSULTANT will prepare the special provisions using the CITY's format.The CITY uses WSDOT 2012 Standard Specifications, and the 2012 Amendments to the 2012 Standard Specifications,The CITY will be responsible for development of general Div 00 and 01 specifications,supplements, bid form and preparing, printing and distributing to interested bidders the final bid document package. • 100 percent submittal will not require City review and resubmittal. • The CITY will provide review comments on the 30, percent,60 percent and 90 percent submittal within two (2)weeks of receipt of submittal. • The CITY will provide to the CONSULTANT electronic versions of their standard CAD details. • CAD files will be delivered using AutoCAD in 2012 format. • The CITY will be responsible for printing and distributing final contract documents and addendums. • The CONSULTANT will use the Western Washington Hydrological Model, or equivalent, for the hydrologic modeling and facility sizing. Hydrology for conveyance system sizing will be using either the rational method or a single storm event models and utilize Manning's equation for capacity calculations. No tailwater analysis is assumed in this scope. • e Two field visits with 2 consultant staff. G Four(4)meetings with two (2)CONSULTANT staff. Page 17 of 25 E1-2012 • • CITY will separately contract with a Landscape Architecture firm for design of the park and provide Landscape Architecture support for design of the regional facility and preparation of the Planting plans.. • The drawings for the improvements will use a horizontal scale of 1 inch= 20 feet. Drawings for the project will be full size 22"x 34" and will include the following: o Cover sheet,vicinity map, index(1) o Legend and notes(1) o Survey control and notes sheet(1) o Site Preparation and Erosion and sediment control plan (2) o Erosion control details(1) o Civil design plan sheets(3) o Civil design and Low Impact Development details(2) o Grading plan sheets(2) o Grading cross sections and drainage profiles(2) o Roadway Sections (1) Task 8. Services during Bidding This task provides for the following support services by the CONSULTANT: • • Assist CITY in answering bidder questions during bid period as requested by the CITY. • Prepare and provide addenda to CITY for distribution to bidders as requested by the CITY. • Services during construction will be scoped and provided under a contract amendment. Task 8 Services During Bidding • CITY will make all notifications for bid advertisements; CITY will field all calls from bidders with questions during the bidding process. Answering bidder questions, as requested by the CITY, will be limited to the hour estimate identified in Exhibit A2: Budget.Any effort required beyond the hour estimate in the budget shall be paid on a time and material basis unless effort required is due to error or omission by CONSULTANT. Services under this Task are limited to 40 hours by CONSULTANT staff Basis of Scope The following general and task specific assumptions have been made in developing the Scope of Work and Budget for the project.They are listed below. General Assumptions • The AGREEMENT has an anticipated start date of January 2013 and is expected to be completed by March 31't,2014,with an anticipated period of inactivity between final construction documents and bid support of 3 months • The standard of care applicable to CONSULTANT's Services will be the degree of skill and diligence normally • employed by professional engineers or consultants performing the same or similar Services at the time said services are performed. CONSULTANT will reperform any services not meeting this standard without additional compensation. Page 18 of 25 • E1-2012 • The CONSULTANT can reasonably rely on the timeliness, accuracy and completeness of the underground utility locates and any other data necessary to accomplish these tasks in a timely fashion. • The CITY will provide consolidated review comments to draft deliverables. The CONSULTANT will provide a written comment response and summary to the client. • Consultant's deliverables, including record drawings,are limited to the sealed and signed hard copies. Computer-generated drawing files furnished by CONSULTANT are for CITY or others'convenience.Any conclusions or information derived or obtained from these files will be at user's sole risk. • The CONSULTANT's ability to meet the schedule is contingent upon timely receipt of survey and any other information from the CITY and or third parties. • This project will be performed in conjunction with the Harrington Avenue NE Green Connection project. • The NE 10`h Street frontage improvements outside the future King County Library will be designed and constructed by the library project. The CONSULTANT will coordinate with that project for storm drain locations, and the continuity of the frontage improvements along NE 10`h Street. • Services during construction is not included in this scope of work. • • Page 19 of.2S E1-2012 Exhibit B -Time Schedule of Completion Su sazerrace Re" oval Stormwater-Fad - Pro ectSchedple.. Notice to Proceed - lanuary.203. 0%Design April 60Ox Design July-2 = - 90%design = October2013 10MDes4gn = November=201 s= • Page 20 of 25 DiM—/nntn font>r/FnrMd(-itv/(nntrBrtC • E1-2012 ... . Task i7escii tron -LOE Labor Sobs '' Expenses Pnr 1 Project Ma4tag�t 162 23.485 $ - $ 23 zURA 2 Basernap Preparation and Supplemental Survey 12-057 S 3 Public,nvolvement 30 `S -4,494 y 4 rol iq draulic'Modeli 4. 124 ;$ 1 ,9% $ $ ;1_.; _. 5 Finalize Geotechnical Report: 26 :$_ 3,35 :. 6 Permit Support 7 Final Design;Construction Documents",'=and Cost Estimate 828 $ 105,378 S` - . S • '243 , _ 1t15, $ Service During Bidding and Corisi ction 4Q $ 6,62 V Total 13 :•:173,482. 5, 179, EXHIBIT C—Cost Estimate • Page 21 of 25 E1-2012 • EXHIBIT C COST PLUS NET FEE DETERMINATION DIRECT SALARY COST: Hourly Rates of Pay* Personnel Project Delivery $73.54 Senior Engineer $60.40 Senior Geotechnical $59.60 Design Manager $54.94 Task Engineer $48.55 Survey Lead $43.77 Survey Technician $40.47 Survey Technician $32.91 Survey Technician $23.58 Cost Estimator $47.70 Design Engineer $40.75 Design Engineer $34.19 CADD Technician $38.72 Geotechnical Engineer $34.13 Contracts Administration $33.76 Clerical $26.10 Accountant $24.27 *direct salary rates are subject to increase April 1,2013 Net Fee 20%of direct salary cost plus overhead DIRECT NON-SALARY COST: Travel and Per Diem Mileage @ IRS reimbursement rate, currently$.565/mile Per Diem: to be addressed if applicable under subsequent Amendment(s) Outside Reproduction Expenses .............................................................................$cost Subconsultant/Lab Services ....................................................................................$cost+2%markup SurveySupplies .......................................................................................................$cost Health &Safety........................................................................................................$ 1.75/hour for applicable staff • Page 22 of 25 • E1-2012 EXHIBIT C(cont.) SUMMARY OF FEE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BREAKDOWN OF OVERHEAD COST See attached Exhibit C Addendum SUMMARY OF COSTS Project No. Name of Project: Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility DirectSalary Cost...............................................................................................................................$57,937 Overhead Cost(including payroll additives..................................................................................149.50% $86,615 Sub-Total $144,552 NetFee ........................................................................................................... 20% $28,910 Direct Non-Salary Costs: a. Travel and per diem.............................................................. $0 b. Reproduction expenses......................................................$325 c. Survey Supplies...................................................................$923 d. Outside consultants(Potholing)......................................$ 4,238 e. Other(Health &Safety).........................................................$54 Total $ 5,540 Sub Total $ 34,450 GRAND TOTAL $ 179,003 Page 23 of 25 Piazza/Data Center/Forms/City/Contracts r CITY OF RENTON SUMMARY OF FAIR PRACTICES POLICY ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO.. 4085 It is the policy of the City:of Renton to promote and provide equal treatment and service to all citizens and to ensure equal employment opportunity to all persons without regard to their race; religion/creed;.national.origin; ancestry;sex;age over 40;sexual orientation or gender identity; pregnancy- HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis C status; use of a guide dog/service animal; marital status; parental/family status; military status; or veteran's status, or the presence of a physical, sensory,. or mental disability, when the City of Renton can reasonably accommodate the disability, of employees and applicants for employment and fair, non-discriminatory treatment to all citizens. All departments of the 'City of Renton shall adhere to the following guidelines: (1) EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES-The City of Renton will ensure all employment related activities included recruitment, selection, promotion, demotion, training, retention and separation are conducted in a manner which is based on job-related criteria which does not discriminate against women, minorities and other protected classes. Human resources decisions will be I. in accordance with individual performance, staffing requirements, governing.civil service rules,and labor contract agreements. (2) COOPERATION WITH HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS The City of Renton 'will cooperate fully with all organizations and commissions • organized to promote fair practices and equal opportunity in employment. (3) CONTRACTORS' OBLIGATIONS- Contractors, sub-contractors, consultants and suppliers conducting business with the City of Renton shall affirm and. subscribe to the Fair Practices and Non-discrimination policies set forth by the law and by City policy. Copies of this policy shall be distributed to all City employees, shall appear in all operational documentation of the City, including bid calls, and shall be prominently displayed in appropriate city facilities. CONCURRED IN by the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, this7th day of March 12011 , CITY RENTON RENTON CITY COUNCIL Denis Law, Mayor until Pr ident Attest: Bonnie I.Walton, City Clerk =. Page 24 of 25 Piazza/Data CPntP.r/Forms/City/Contracts • E1-2012 CITY OF RENTON FAIR PRACTICES POLICY AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE CH2M HILL Engineers, Inc. hereby confirms and declares that: (Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant) I. It is the policy of the above-named contractor/subcontractor/consultant, to offer equal opportunity to all qualified employees and applicants for employment without regard to their race; religion/creed; national origin; ancestry; sex; the presence of a physical, sensory, or mental disability; age over 40; sexual orientation or gender identity; pregnancy; HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis C status; use of a guide dog/service animal; marital status; parental/family status; military status; or veteran's status. • II. The above-named contractor/subcontractor/consultant complies with all applicable federal, state and local laws governing non-discrimination in employment. III. When applicable,the above-named contractor/subcontractor/consultant will seek out and negotiate with minority and women contractors for the award of subcontracts. /`,1 CA,,jC j �f C/fit�•�(� Print Agent/Representative's Name 9 W o p""h'w s- of q,- Print Agent/Representative's Title ////v Agent/Representative's Signature Date Signed Instructions: This document MUST be completed by each contractor, subcontractor, consultant and/or supplier. Include or attach this document(s) with the contract. Page 25 of 25 Piazza/Data-Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 CAG-13-023 i ENGINEERING ANNUAL CONSULTANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this day of AO/3, by and between the CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HEREINAFTER CALLE THE "CITY," and CH2MHILL Engineers, g , Inc. whose address is 1100 112th Ave NE Suite 400 Bellevue, WA 98004, at which work will be available for inspection, hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT." PROJECT NAME:Sunset Community Plan SSIP-Harrington Avenue NE Green Connections Project WHEREAS,the City has not sufficient qualified engineering employees to provide the engineering within a reasonable time and the City deems it advisable and is desirous of engaging the professional services and assistance of a qualified professional consulting firm to do the necessary engineering work for the project,and WHEREAS,the Consultant has represented and by entering into this Agreement now represents, that it is in full compliance with the statutes of the State of Washington for registration of professional engineers, has a current valid corporate certificate from the State of Washington or has a valid assumed name filing with the Secretary of State and that all personnel to be assigned to the work required under this Agreement are fully qualified to perform the work to which they will be assigned in a competent and professional manner, and that sufficient qualified personnel are on staff or readily available to Consultant to staff this Agreement. WHEREAS,the Consultant has indicated that it desires to do the work set forth in the Agreement upon the terms • and conditions set forth below. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performances contained herein below, the parties hereto agree as follows: I SCOPE OF WORK The Consultant shall furnish, and hereby warrants that it has,the necessary equipment, materials, and professionally trained and experienced personnel to facilitate completion of the work described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. The Consultant shall perform all work described in this Agreement in accordance with the latest edition and amendments to local and state regulations, guidelines and policies. The Consultant shall prepare such information and studies as it may deem pertinent and necessary, in order to pass judgment in a sound engineering manner on the features of the work. The Consultant shall make such minor changes, amendments or revisions in the detail of the work as may be required by the City. This item does not constitute an "Extra Work" item as related in Section VIII of the Agreement. The work shall be verified for accuracy by a complete check by the Consultant. The Consultant will be held responsible for the accuracy of the work, even though the work has been accepted by the City. 11 • DESIGN CRITERIA The City will designate the basic premises and criteria for the work needed. Reports and plans, to the extent feasible, shall be developed in accordance with the latest edition and amendments of local and State regulations, guidelines, and specifications, including, but not limited to the following: Page 1 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 1. Washington State Department of Transportation/American Public Works Association (WSDOT/APWA), "Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction," as amended by Renton Standard Specification. 2. WSDOT/APWA, "Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction." 3. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Highway Design Manual." 4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges." 5. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Bridge Design Manual,Volumes 1 and 2." 6. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Manual of Highways Hydraulics," except hydrologic analysis as described in item 14. 7. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Materials Laboratory Outline." 8. Transportation Research Board, "Highway Capacity Manual." 9. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways." 10. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Construction Manual." 11. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Local Agency Guidelines." 12. Standard drawings prepared by the City and furnished to the Consultant shall be used as a guide in all cases where they fit design conditions. Renton Design Standards, and Renton Specifications shall be used as they pertain. • 13. Metro Transit, design criteria. 14. King County Surface Water Design Manual,Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1, and Chapters 3,4, and 5. 15. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets." III ITEMS TO BE FURNISHED TO THE CONSULTANT BY THE CITY The City will furnish the Consultant copies of documents which are available to the City that will facilitate the preparation of the plans, studies, specifications, and estimates within the limits of the assigned work. All other records needed for the study must be obtained by the Consultant. The Consultant will coordinate with other available sources to obtain data or records available to those agencies. The Consultant shall be responsible for this and any other data collection to the extent provided for in the Scope of Work. City will provide to Consultant all data in City's possession relating to Consultants services on the project. Consultant will reasonably rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the information provided by the City. Should field studies be needed,the Consultant will perform such work to the extent provided for in the Scope of Work. The City will not be obligated to perform any such field studies. • Page 2 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 • IV OWNERSHIP OF PRODUCTS AND DOCUMENTS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CONSULTANT Documents, exhibits or other presentations for the work covered by this Agreement shall be furnished by the Consultant to the City upon completion of the various phases of the work. All such material, including working documents, notes, maps, drawings, photo, photographic negatives, etc. used in the project,shall become and remain the property of the City and may be used by it without restriction. Any use of such documents by the City not directly related to the project pursuant to which the documents were prepared by the Consultant shall be without any liability whatsoever to the Consultant. All written documents and products shall be printed on recycled paper when practicable. Use of the chasing-arrow symbol identifying the recycled content of the paper shall be used whenever practicable. All documents will be printed on both sides of the recycled paper, as feasible. All reports, drawings, specifications, documents, and other deliverables of Consultant,whether in hard copy or in electronic form, are instruments of service for this project,whether the project is completed or not. City agrees to indemnify Consultant and Consultant's officers, employees, subcontractors, and affiliated corporations from all claims, damages, losses, and costs, including,but not limited to, litigation expenses and attorney's fees arising out of or related to the unauthorized reuse, change or alteration of these project documents. V TIME OF BEGINNING AND COMPLETION The work detailed in the Scope of Work will be performed according to Exhibit B,Time Schedule of Completion, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. It is agreed that all the Consultant's services are to be completed and all products shall be delivered by the Consultant unless there are delays due to factors that are beyond the control of the Consultant. The Consultant shall not begin work under the terms of this Agreement until authorized in writing by the City. If, after receiving Notice to Proceed,the Consultant is delayed in the performance of its services by factors that are beyond its control, the Consultant shall notify the City of the delay and shall prepare a revised estimate of the time and cost needed to complete the Project and submit the revision to the City for its approval. Time schedules are subject to mutual agreement for any revision unless specifically described as otherwise herein. Delays attributable to or caused by one of the parties hereto amounting to 30 days or more affecting the completion of the work may be considered a cause for renegotiation or termination of this Agreement by the other pa rty. VI PAYMENT The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter as specified in Exhibit C, Cost Estimate. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work. All billings for compensation for work performed under this Agreement will list actual time (days and/or hours) and dates during which the work was performed and the compensation shall be figured using the rates in Exhibit C. Payment for this work shall not exceed$212,704 without a written amendment to this • contract, agreed to and signed by both parties. Cost Plus Net Fee Payment for work accomplished shall be on the basis of the Consultant's actual cost plus a net fee. The actual cost includes direct salary cost, overhead, and direct non-salary cost. Page 3 of 26 P i azza/Data_Ce me r/Fo rm s/City/Contra cts E1-2012 1. The direct salary cost is the salary expense for professional and technical personnel and principals for 0 the time they are productively engaged in the work necessary to fulfill the terms of this Agreement. The direct salary costs are set forth in the attached Exhibit C and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. 2. The overhead costs as identified on Exhibit C are determined as 149.5 percent of the direct salary cost and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. The overhead cost rate is an estimate based on currently available accounting information and shall be used for all progress payments over the period of the contract. 3. The direct non-salary costs are those costs directly incurred in fulfilling the terms of this Agreement, including, but not limited to travel, reproduction,telephone, supplies, and fees of outside consultants. The direct non-salary costs are specified in Exhibit C, Cost Estimate. Billings for any direct non-salary costs shall be supported by copies of original bills or invoices. Reimbursement for outside consultants and services shall be on the basis of times the invoiced amount. 4. The net fee, which represents the Consultants profit shall be 20 percent of direct salary plus overhead costs. This fee is based on the Scope of Work and the estimated labor hours therein. In the event a supplemental agreement is entered into for additional work by the Consultant,the supplemental agreement will include provision for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The net fee will be prorated and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of the project completed as estimated in the Consultant's monthly progress reports and approved by the City. Any portion of the net fee not previously paid in the monthly payments shall be included in the final payment, subject to the provisions of Section XI entitled TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. • 5. Progress payments may be claimed monthly for direct costs actually incurred to date as supported by detailed statements,for overhead costs and for a proportionate amount of the net fee payable to the Consultant based on the estimated percentage of the completion of the services to date. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the gross amount earned will be made promptly upon its verification by the City after completion and acceptance by the City of the work under this Agreement. Acceptance, by the Consultant of final payment shall constitute full and final satisfaction of all amounts due or claimed to be due. Payment for extra work performed under this Agreement shall be paid as agreed to by the parties hereto in writing at the time extra work is authorized. (Section VIII "EXTRA WORK"). A short narrative progress report shall accompany each voucher for progress payment. The report shall include discussion of any problems and potential causes for delay. To provide a means of verifying the invoiced salary costs for consultant employees,the City may conduct employee interviews. Acceptance of such final payment by the Consultant shall constitute a release of all claims of any nature, related to this Agreement, which the Consultant may have against the City unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the City by the Consultant prior to its acceptance. Said final payment shall not, however, be a bar to any claims that the City may have against the Consultant or to any remedies the City may pursue with respect to such claims. The Consultant and its subconsultants shall keep available for inspection, by the City,for a period of three years after final payment,the cost records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement and all items related to, or bearing upon, these records. If any litigation,claim or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year retention Page 4 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 • period,the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims or audit findings involving the records have been resolved. The three-year retention period starts when the Consultant receives final payment. VII CHANGES IN WORK The Consultant shall make all such revisions and changes in the completed work of this Agreement as are necessary to correct errors appearing therein, when required to do so by the City, without additional compensation. Should the City find it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed work or parts thereof revised,the Consultant shall make such revisions, if requested and as directed by the City in writing. This work shall be considered as Extra Work and will be paid for as provided in Section VIII. VIII EXTRA WORK The City may desire to have the Consultant perform work or render services in connection with the Project in addition to or other than work provided for by the expressed intent of the Scope of Work. Such work will be considered as Extra Work and will be specified in a written supplement which will set forth the nature and scope thereof. Work under a supplement shall not proceed until authorized in writing by the City. Any dispute as to whether work is Extra Work or work already covered under this Agreement shall be resolved before the work is undertaken. Performance of the work by the Consultant prior to resolution of any such dispute shall waive any claim by the Consultant for compensation as Extra Work. IX EMPLOYMENT The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee. Any and all employees of the Consultant, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the Consultant under this Agreement, shall be considered employees of the Consultant only and not of the City and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workman's Compensation Act on behalf of said employees, while so engaged and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any negligent act or omission on the part of the Consultant's employees, while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the Consultant. The Consultant shall not engage, on a full or part-time basis, or other basis, during the period of the contract, any professional or technical personnel who are, or have been at any time during the period of this contract, in the employ of the City except regularly retired employees,without written consent of the City. If during the time period of this Agreement, the Consultant finds it necessary to increase its professional,technical, or clerical staff as a result of this work,the Consultant will actively solicit minorities through their advertisement and interview process. Page 5 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 X • NONDISCRIMINATION The Consultant agrees not to discriminate against any client, employee or applicant for employment or for services because of race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation, sex, age or handicap except for a bona fide occupational qualification with regard to, but not limited to the following: employment upgrading; demotion or transfer; recruitment or any recruitment advertising; layoff or termination's; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; selection for training; rendition of services. The Consultant understands and agrees that if it violates this Non-Discrimination provision,this Agreement may be terminated by the City and further that the Consultant shall be barred from performing any services for the City now or in the future, unless a showing is made satisfactory to the City that discriminatory practices have terminated and that recurrence of such action is unlikely. XI TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time upon not less than ten (10)days written notice to the Consultant, subject to the City's obligation to pay Consultant in accordance with subparagraphs C and D below. B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant,or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses. In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in the previous paragraph, should the surviving members of the Consultant, with the City's concurrence, desire to terminate this Agreement, payment shall be made as set forth in Subsection C of this section. C. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City other than for fault on the part of the Consultant, a final payment shall be made to the Consultant for actual cost for the work complete at the time of termination of the Agreement, plus the following described portion of the net fee. The portion of the net fee for which the Consultant shall be paid shall be the same ratio to the total net fee as the work complete is to the total work required by the Agreement. In addition,the Consultant shall be paid on the same basis as above for any authorized extra work completed. No payment shall be made for any work completed after ten (10)days following receipt by the Consultant of the Notice to Terminate. If the accumulated payment made to the Consultant prior to Notice of Termination exceeds the total amount that would be due as set forth herein above, then no final payment shall be due and the Consultant shall immediately reimburse the City for any excess paid. D. In the event the services of the Consultant are terminated by the City for fault on the part of the Consultant,the above stated formula for payment shall not apply. In such an event the amount to be paid shall be determined by the City with consideration given to the actual costs incurred by the Consultant in performing the work to the date of termination, the amount of work originally required which was satisfactorily completed to date of termination, whether that work is in a form or of a type which is usable to the City at the time of termination,the cost to the City of employing another firm to complete the work required and the time which may be required to do so, and other factors which affect the value to the City of the work performed at the time of termination. Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsection exceed the amount which would have been made if the formula set forth in subsection C above had been applied. Page 6 of 26 Piazza/Data Cemer/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 • E. In the event this Agreement is terminated prior to completion of the work,the original copies of all Engineering plans, reports and documents prepared by the Consultant prior to termination shall become the property of the City for its use without restriction. Such unrestricted use not occurring as a part of this project, shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. F. Payment for any part of the work by the City shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any remedies of any type it may have against the Consultant for any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant, or for failure of the Consultant to perform work required of it by the City. Forbearance of any rights under the Agreement will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to any future act or omission by the Consultant. XII DISPUTES Any dispute concerning questions of facts in connection with work not disposed of by agreement between the Consultant and the City shall be referred for determination to the Public Works Administrator or his/her successors and delegees, whose decision in the matter shall be final and conclusive on the parties to this Agreement. In the event that either party is required to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any of its rights in this Agreement, both parties agree that any such action shall be brought in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, situated in King County at the Maleng Regional Justice Center in Kent,Washington. XIII LEGAL RELATIONS The Consultant shall comply with all Federal Government, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be done under this Agreement. This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of Washington. The Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands or suits at law or equity arising in whole or part from the Consultant's errors, omissions, or negligent acts under this Agreement provided that nothing herein shall require the Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims, demands or suits based upon the conduct of the City, its officers or employees and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of(a)the Consultant's agents or employees and (b)the City, its agents, officers and employees, this provision with respect to claims or suits based upon such concurrent negligence shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence or the negligence of the Consultant's agents or employees. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Consultant's liability for City's damages will not, in the aggregate, exceed $1,000,000. This article takes precedence over any conflicting article of this AGREEMENT or any document incorporated into it or referenced by it. This limitation of liability will apply whether Consultant's liability arises under breach of contract or warranty; tort; including negligence;strict liability; statutory liability; or any other cause of action, and shall include Consultant's officers, affiliated corporations, employees, and subcontractors. i Insurance Page 7 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries • to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types described below: 1. Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned, hired and leased vehicles.Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO)form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary,the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises,operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City. 3. Workers'Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional Liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession. B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance Consultant shall maintain the following insurance limits: 1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than$1,000,000 each occurrence,$2,000,000 general aggregate. 3. Professional Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. C. Other Insurance Provision The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they shall be primary insurance as respect to the City. Any Insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. D. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than ANIL E. Verification of Coverage Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work. Page S of 26 P iazza/Data_Ce me r/Fo rms/City/Co ntracts E1-2012 • F. Notice of Cancellation The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice. G. Failure to Maintain Insurance Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due the Consultant from the City. The limits of said insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of Consultant hereunder. The Consultant shall also submit copies of the declarations pages of relevant insurance policies to the City within 30 days of contract acceptance if requested. The Certification and Declaration page(s) shall be in a form as approved by the City. If the City's Risk Manager has the Declaration page(s) on file from a previous contract and no changes in insurance coverage has occurred, only the Certification Form will be required. The Consultant shall verify, when submitting first payment invoice and annually thereafter, possession of a current City of Renton business license while conducting work for the City. The Consultant shall require, and provide verification upon request, that all subconsultants participating in a City project possess a current City of Renton • business license. The Consultant shall provide, and obtain City approval of, a traffic control plan prior to conducting work in City right-of-way. The Consultant's relation to the City shall be at all times as an independent contractor. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitute the Consultant's waiver of immunity under the Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this agreement. XIV SUBLETTING OR ASSIGNING OF CONTRACTS The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the work covered by this Agreement without the express consent of the City. XV ENDORSEMENT OF PLANS The Consultant shall place their certification on all plans, specifications, estimates or any other engineering data furnished by them in accordance with RCW 18.43.070. XVI OPINIONS OF COST In providing opinions of cost, financial analyses, economic feasibility projections, and schedules for the project, the Consultant has no control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or maintenance costs; competitive bidding procedures and market conditions; time or quality of performance by third parties; quality, type, management, or direction of operating personnel; and other economic and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate project cost or schedule. Therefore, the Consultant makes no warranty that City's actual project costs, financial aspects, Page 9 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Form s/City/Contracts E1-2012 economic feasibility, or schedules will not vary from the Consultant's opinions, analyses, projections, or estimates-* If the City wishes greater assurance as to any element of project cost, feasibility, or schedule, the City will employ an independent cost estimator, Consultant, or other appropriate advisor. XVII COMPLETE AGREEMENT This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants, stipulations, and provisions agreed upon by the parties. Any supplements to this Agreement will be in writing and executed and will become part of this Agreement. No agent, or representative of either party has authority to make,and the parties shall not be bound by or be liable for,any statement, representation, promise, or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments, or modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as an amendment to this Agreement. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision in this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted. XVIII EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original having identical legal effect. The Consultant does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations, . warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the Request for Qualifications, and the supporting materials submitted by the Consultant, and does hereby accept the Agreement and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CONSULT AN CITY OF EN N 9�q 1/2 3/1; 6G�-",r �) Signature //�� /I Date Mayor Denis Law Date I'r►I�Ate/ RlitfVo14 type or print name ATTEST: iVU/ Ili 0 Title Bonnie I.Walton, City Clerk 4 o- _J Page 10 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 Exhibit A City of Renton Sunset Community Low Impact Development Retrofit Project— Green Connection: Harrington Avenue NE 1. Background The City of Renton completed and adopted the Sunset Community Plan and Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement which evaluated potential impacts of redevelopment in the Sunset area and required infrastructure. As part of this effort the City developed and adopted the Sunset Area Surface Water Master Plan which identifies stormwater improvements to convey, treat, detain and infiltrate runoff from the existing and future land cover conditions. Recommended improvements include the following: • New Storm Drainage mains. • Green street improvements (AKA Harrington Ave. NE Green Connections) along Harrington Ave. NE between NE 16`h St. and NE 101h St. at locations that fit with existing and planned future land use in the area to provide enhanced basic water quality treatment and flow control. within the right-of-way .The Harrington Ave NE green connections will consist of permeable sidewalks and rain gardens. • A regional storm water infiltration facility consists of constructing an infiltration/flow control facility for • flow control mitigation and a rain garden for providing enhanced basic water quality treatment. This scope of work pertains to the design of the proposed project which will retrofit pollution generating impervious surface (PGIS) and residential areas in the Sunset Area Community by providing enhanced basic water quality treatment prior to discharging into Johns Creek. The project will install rain gardens and permeable concrete sidewalk improvements along an existing roadway,taking under consideration utility conflicts and possible future uses of the sites.The project will also provide public education on LID. This scope will prepare construction documents (plans, specifications and construction cost estimate)for a portion of the Harrington Avenue Green Connection. Tasks included in this scope of work include data collection, survey and basemap preparation, permitting support,final design of the facility, preparation of a technical information report, public outreach support, services during bidding, and project management as defined in the tasks below. Services for during construction and construction management are not included in this scope of work and would be included in a separate amendment. II. DESIGN CRITERIA The City will designate the basic premises and criteria for the design. In addition, design reports and plans, to the extent feasible, shall be developed in accordance with the latest edition of the following documents: 1. Washington State Department of Transportation/American Public Works Association (WSDOT/ APWA), Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction 2010 edition • 2. City of Renton Transportation Standard Specifications. Page 11 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 3. 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and City of Renton Amendments to the 2009 KCSWDM. 2005 Low Impact Development Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound or current version as applicable. 4. Measurements will be in English units 5. Drafting Standards: City of Renton. o Vertical Datum: NA VD 88 o Horizontal Datum: NAD 83191 111. Compliance with the FY 2012 Statewide Stormwater Grant Program—Proviso Funding Agreement Design reports and plans, shall be developed in accordance with Task 2, design plans and specifications under Grant Agreement Number G1200544. Task 1. Project Management Perform project management, administration, and coordination of work effort involved in all phases and tasks.This task will continue throughout the duration of the project. It will include the work necessary to develop the project management plan, set up financial accounting including subconsultants, develop and implement quality management plan (QMP),overall project coordination with the CITY and project team, and project closeout. Invoices and progress reports will be provided to the CITY on a monthly basis. Monthly progress reports will include a summary of work performed by the CONSULTANT for that period and the work anticipated to be completed in the next period. This task includes a project kick-off meeting at the CITY with two (2) CONSULTANT attendees, assuming Two (2) hours in length. QA/QC: Consultant shall conduct internal quality control regarding collection of data, surveying, basemap preparation and hydraulic modeling and all other tasks. tjc Task 1 Deliverables • Monthly Invoices and progress reports, assuming a 9 month project duration • Bi-weekly phone call or email check-ins with the County project manager to report project status Project Schedule • • Notice to Proceed—February 2013 • 30% Design - March 2013 • 60% Design—June 2013 • 90%?—September 2013 Page 12 of 26 P is zza/Data_Ce me r/Forms/City/Co ntra cts E1-2012 • 0 100% Design—October 2013 a�lA _Feb Task 1 Assumption ;�t b MkA " Aa`� • Project duration is assumed to be a 15 month project duration with a -month inactive period where no invoices will be prepared. Task 2. Survey and Mapping The CONSULTANT will perform a conventional traverse to establish horizontal and vertical control within the project limits, and conduct a terrestrial LiDAR survey to produce a project basemap and Digital Terrain Model (DTM)to be used in final design. Additional survey work will be conducted using conventional survey methods to supplement the basemap and DTM, and to locate existing utilities as needed. 2.1. Survey and Construction Control The CONSULTANT will establish horizontal and vertical control points along the corridor and within the project limits described above. Up to six(6) permanent control points will be established for the rp oject, and made available for the City's use during construction.The CONSULTANT will locate,field survey, and calculate positions for monuments and control points within the project limits, using the Washington State plane coordinate system. Conventional and GPS surveying methods will be used on this project.The Consultant will locate and tie control traverse into 3 City monuments.The Consultant will provide basic traffic control during field survey. • 2.2. Base Mapping Task 2.2.1 estrial LiDAR Survey The CONSULTANT wi rform a terrestrial LiDAR and topographic survey along Harrington Ave. NE from NE 16th St. to NE 10th St. and of su ' ient area to include the intersection of Harrington Ave NE and NE 16th st. and the intersection of Harrington Av E and NE 10th Sti(see Attachment A for survey boundaries). Transfer survey field data to Auto`CAD and prepare a ect basern and DTM sufficient for 1-foot contour intervalsJhe CONSU th?full roadway width and 25-feet outside the existing edge of pavement.The base ma um: i 1 �• Horizontally locate all visibly . entifiable structures and features to include but not limited to building faces/corners, manhtries, vaults, fences, signs, trees (including type) over 4 inches, cables, edges of pavementrb and gutter, sidewalks, culverts, utility poles, ditches, water-valves, fire hydrants, driv gays, gas, power, signal and illumination poles and other surface features (junction boxes ant}-traffic controller service cabinets)within the project limits as describe above. 2. Determine grade, Rim and invert elevations of utility structures that may impact storm pipe design including water valve nuts and sewer and storm measure downs. This will be done in coordination with Task 2.2.1. 3. The CONSULTANT will also locate surface features (valves, manholes;catch basins,junction boxes,vaults)to delineate the utilities to the full extent of the mapping limits. . 4. The CONSULTANT will perform field observations (measure-downs) of existing sto drain catch basins and manholes to determine the approximate size, type (i.e. brick, conc e), and general condition of the structures to confirm suitability for continued use. A measurements will be made from the surface, and no structures or confined spaces will be entered for the purposes of these field observations. Page 13 of 26 Piazza/Data_Ce me r/Forms/City/Contra cts E1-2012 5. The consultant will check base map against record drawings to identify any significant• discrepancies that may require further survey. Graphic illustration of survey tie-in to City monuments will be included in the base map.. Task 2.2.2 Utility locations and potholing: The CONSULTANT will utilize a "One-Call Locate Service"to field locate all major utilities including but not limited to TV,gas, power,telephone, water, sewer,fiber optic, and King County wastewater utilities identified in the street prior to field survey so that these locations can be picked up during the field survey.The CONSULTANT will locate utility paint marks and surface utility features along Harrington Avenue NE within the project limits as described above.The CONSULTANT will compare available utility record drawings(As-Build's) against surface evidence of utilities obtained during the initial survey. Critical conflicts of identified utilities with proposed duign improvements may require pot irm tTie uti ity ocation and elevation.Potholing will be performed by a SiL contractor(APS). All utility potholes will be surveyed and a table of potholing results will be prepared.A field worksheet with location,type of utility,type of material, diameter of utility depth and measurements from fixed pointes will be provided. Photos of each utility will be included in the potholing information. The CONSULTANT has budgeted up to$5000 for utility potholin approximately 10 potholes),`which is assumed to occur within the paved road surface. In the event of unavoidable uti ity con acts, tie CONSULTANT will provide a list of conflicts to the CITY to notify the applicable utility agency to initiate the relocation of their utility prior to construction by the • CITY. Coordination with t TYa -pathnLng_Subwill e provided prior to the 60 percent plan submittal.Work by subcontractor will include right of way permitting,traffic control, backfilling and resurfacing per City of Renton standards. Task 2.2 Deliverables 1. 1" = 20' Design Basemapping in AutoCAD 2012 format using City of Renton standard. INROADS compatible Digital Terrain Model (DTM), saved in AutoCAD drawing(DWG)format. 2. Subsurface utility exploration (Pothole) plan. 3. Draft base map incorporated in 30%design submittal for review and comment. 4. Final basemap will be incorporated in the project construction documents and final AutoCAD submittal. Pothole Assumptions 1 Potholes will be backfilled with gravel (with 5/8-inch minus gravel compacted at 8 to 12-inch lifts) and the surface will be patched with like material. Depth of patch material shall match thickness of existing asphalt. One exception is that gas lines will initially be backfilled with 12 inches of sand then followed by gravel per PSE requirements. 2. Subcontractor will be responsible for requesting right of way permit. 3. Subcontractor will submit a traffic control plan to the City . 4. One call utility locating service will be called 5. Materials removed from potholing with be disposed of at a permitted disposal site. Also it is assumed that materials are contaminant free. Page 14 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 • 2.3. Supleme�ISurvey It is assumed that during the design phase, some level of supplemental survey may be necessary as the design progresses.The CONSULTANT will perform supplemental surveys as needed for purposes such as private property match/conforms, locating additional utility features including pothole locations, structures and elevations,or to obtain features requiring more definition for design purposes. For budgeting purposes this task item has been estimated not to exceed 20-field crew hours Any costs for performing additional survey beyond 20-field crew hours, will be covered by supplemental agreement. Task 2.3 Deliverables 1. Updated V = 20' Design Basemapping in AutoCAD 2012 format. 2. Updated INROADS compatible Digital Terrain Model (DTM), saved in AutoCAD drawing(DWG)format. 2.4. Right of Way Field Surveys 2.4.1 Right of Way Field Surveys The CONS TANT will perform field surveys to locate controlling section corners, plat monuments, street right of way monument , nd property corners to facilitate calculations for street centerline and right of way lines.As this project assumes no p i to parcel impacts, beyond Temporary Construction Easements, individual parcel lines will be shown as of on Ci f Renton GIS sources. Monuments or corners to be located and field surveyed may • include the following: • Section Corners • Side street monuments • Centerline monuments on Harrington Avenue NE. 22.. Records Research and Right of Way Calculations The CON5b'gANT will establish the existing right of way and centerlines within the project limits as described above for Harris n Avenue NE. The CONSULTANT shall calcu and establish right of way lines using recorded plats and surveys, assessor maps, and other available sources of recor ta. Should any private property acquisition and/or permanent easements be deemed necessary for completion of thI oject,The CITY shall provide the CONSULTANT with title reports and supporting documentation. Task 2.4.2 Deliverables • Right of way calculations and supporting documentation • AutoCAD 2012 file of existing right of way lines and centerlines Task 3. Public Involvement The CONSULTANT will provide support to the CITY for agency, stakeholder, and public consultation and coordination required during the design process. It is anticipated that the CITY will provide the lead in coordinating . with stakeholders inc�li RH and Parkc however,the following forums are anticipated in this scope: • Public Open House/Neighborhood Walk: It is anticipated that the project will provide public outreach through a field walk with the community to communicate the proposed project elements, goals and impacts to a broader audience. The CONSULTANT will support this effort by providing flyers developed from products created under other tasks described in this scope of work. Page 15 of 26 Pia zza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 Task 3 Deliverables 1. One (1) Neighborhood walk with the community through the project area. Assumed up to Two (2) CONSULTANT Staff will be present at the community field walk. 2. One (1) page flyer depicting the proposed the location of project improvements including a rendering of up to four (4) photo-realistic simulations of proposed rain gardens Superimposed over photographs of the existing streetscape. Task 3 Assumption • CITY will organize and host public meetings and provide notifications. CONSULTANT will participate in presentations and prepare presentation materials. Task 4-Hydrologic/Hydraulic Modeling 4.1 Modeling of LID facilities 1. Size individual rain gardens needed to mitigate the cumulative water quality impacts from Harington Ave NE.The consultant will delineate the sub basin areas tributary to each rain garden.The drainage area delineation will include tributary roadway as well as sidewalk, driveways, and pervious areas if applicable. 2. Rain Gardens will be sized per the 2005 DOE manual to filter a minimum of 91 percent of the runoff through bioretention media. 3. Conduct modeling in WWHM or approved equivalent models to size each individual rain • garden. 4. Pervious sidewalk subgrade depth will be modeled to infiltrate 100 percent of rainfall. 4.2 Modeling of required conveyance improvements Determine the required pipe size to convey runoff to and from the rain gardens. These pipes will be designed at a minimum in accordance with the criteria specified in Section 1.2.4 of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 4.3 Drainage Technical Information Report CONSULTANT will prepare a Draft and Final Drainage Technical Information Report to reflect the hydrological and hydraulic conditions of the proposed LID improvements. Task 4 Deliverables 1- Electronic modeling files, including input and output parameters. 2. Documentation of sizing assumptions, methods, and results to be included in the drainage report 3. Brief memo summarizing model input and assumptions for City review to be submitted at the 30% design level. 4. One (1) hard copy (and electronic copy) of the Draft and Final Technical Information Report at the 60 and 90 percent submittals. • Page 16 of 26 Piazza/Data_Ce nter/Fo rms/City/Contra cts E1-2012 • Task 5. Permitting Support The CONSULTANT will provide support to the CITY to identify and provide supporting data for permit applications. The CONSULTANT will provide up to 24 hours to support preparation of permit documents.The City will be responsible for completing the permit application and obtaining the permit. In support of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, the Consultant will prepare an Environmental Checklist in support of a land use permit from the City.The checklist will include project information on background and environmental elements (earth, air,water, plants, animals,energy and natural resources, environmental health, land and shoreline use, housing, aesthetics, light and glare, recreation, historic and cultural preservation, transportation, public services, and utilities). Potential permits that may be required for the project are: a) SEPA Checklist, b) NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit; and c) Grading permit. Assumptions 0 The project is covered under the Sunset Area Planned Action EIS and will not require a separate Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) • 0 Completion of the Environmental Checklist will rely on information contained in other documents prepared for the project and project design elements (e.g., temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan,traffic plan, storm water pollution prevention plan, etc.) 0 Some environmental elements will not apply to the project (e.g., housing, light and glare) 0 The City will sign the Environmental Checklist 0 The Environmental Checklist will be submitted to the City with the Land Use Permit Application Deliverables 0 Draft SEPA Environmental Checklist for City review--electronic file in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) file format and one hard copy. 0 Final SEPA Environmental Checklist--electronic file in Adobe Acrobat(PDF)file format and one hard copy. Task 6. Final Design, Construction Documents and Cost Estimate Based on the result of the pre-design,the CONSULTANT will then prepare draft Construction Drawings,technical special provision, and cost estimate representing approximately the 30 percent, 60 percent, 90 and 100 percent completion level for the selected improvements.The CONSULTANT will prepare the contract provisions at the 100 percent completion. Half-size (11"x17") drawings will be submitted to the CITY for review at the 30, 60, and 90 percent stages.The 60 percent drawings can also be used by the CITY to prepare and submit permit packages. No additional drawings will be prepared by the CONSULTANT for use in permit applications. CONSULTANT will prepare a Draft and Final Technical Information Report to reflect the hydrological and hydraulic conditions of the proposed LID improvements as described in Task 4.3. Page 17 of 26 Piazza/Mace nter/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 Task 7 Deliverables 1. Three (3) hard copy sets of half size (11"x17" sheets) draft construction drawings will be submitted to the CITY for review and comment at the 30 percent, 60 and 90 percent completion level. 2. Three (3) hard copy sets of half-size (11"x17" sheets) construction drawings will be submitted to the CITY at the 100 percent completion level. 3. Three (3) sets of engineer's cost estimate and technical specifications outline will be submitted to the CITY for the 30 percent submittal. 4. Three (3) sets of hard copy of specifications, and summary of quantities including an engineer's cost estimate for construction will be submitted to the CITY for the 60, 90 and 100 percent submittals. 5. Electronic files AutoCAD 2012 format at the end of the project. 6. Submittal documents for compliance with the FY 2012 Statewide Stormwater Grant Program — Proviso Funding Agreement number G1200544. Task 7 Meetings • Two (2) meeting with two (2)CONSULTANT staff and with the CITY staff at the CITY offices to receive and discuss the 30 percent and 60 percent review comments. • One (1) meeting with two (2) CONSULTANT staff and with the CITY staff at the CITY offices to resolve and coordinate any outstanding issues prior to completion of the 100 percent completion construction . documents. Task 7 Assumptions • The CONSULTANT will prepare the special provisions using the CITY's format.The CITY uses WSDOT 2012 Standard Specifications, and the 2012 Amendments to the 2012 Standard Specifications.The CITY will be responsible for development of general Div 00 and 01 specifications,supplements, bid form and preparing, printing and distributing to interested bidders the final bid document package. • 100 percent submittal will not required City review and resubmittal. • The CITY will provide review comments on the 30 percent, 60 percent and 90 percent submittal within two (2) weeks of receipt of submittal. • The CITY will provide to the CONSULTANT electronic versions of their standard CAD details. • CAD files will be delivered using AutoCAD in 2012 format. • The CITY will be responsible for printing and distributing final contract documents and addendums. • The CONSULTANT will use the Western Washington Hydrological Model, or equivalent,for the hydrologic modeling and facility sizing. Hydrology for conveyance system sizing will be using either the rational method or a single storm event models and utilize Manning's equation for capacity calculations. No tailwater analysis is assumed in this scope. • Two field visits with 2 consultant staff. • Three (3) meetings with two (2)CONSULTANT staff. Page 18 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 • • Final Geotechnical Report will be prepared under separate contract for the Sunset Regional Facility and will cover recommendations for both projects. • The drawings for the improvements will use a horizontal scale of 1 inch= 20 feet. Drawings for the project will be full size 22"x 34" and will include the following: o Cover sheet,vicinity map, index (1) o Legend and notes(1) o Survey control and notes sheet (1) o Site Preparation and Erosion and sediment control plan (3) o Erosion control details (1) o Typical Roadway Section (1) o Civil design plan sheet (3) o Civil details (3) o Grading plan sheets (3) o Grading cross sections and drainage profiles (2) o Landscape planting plan (3) • o Landscape planting details (2) Task 8. Services during Bidding This task provides for the following support services by the CONSULTANT: • Assist CITY in answering bidder questions during bid period as requested by the CITY. • Prepare and provide addenda to CITY for distribution to bidders as requested by the CITY. • Services during construction will be scoped and provided under a contract amendment. Task 8 Assumptions • CITY will make all notifications for bid advertisements; CITY will field all calls from bidders with questions during the bidding process. Answering bidder questions, as requested by the CITY, will be limited to the hour estimate identified in Exhibit B2. Any effort required beyond the hour estimate in the budget shall be paid on a time and material basis unless effort required is due to error or omission by CONSULTANT. • Services under this Task are limited to 40 hours by CONSULTANT staff. • Services during construction is not included in this scope of work. Basis of Scope The following general and task specific assumptions have been made in developing the Scope of Work and Budget for the project.They are listed below. . General Assumptions • The AGREEMENT has an anticipated start date of February 15, 2013 and is expected to be completed by March 31st, 2014, with an anticipated period of inactivity between final construction documents and bid support of 3 months. Page 19 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 • The standard of care applicable to CONSULTANT's Services will be the degree of skill and diligence normally employed by professional engineers or consultants performing the same or similar Services at the time said services are performed. CONSULTANT will reperform any services not meeting this standard without additional compensation. • The CONSULTANT can reasonably rely on the timeliness, accuracy and completeness of the underground utility locates and any other data necessary to accomplish these tasks in a timely fashion. • The CITY will provide consolidated review comments to draft deliverables. The CONSULTANT will provide a written comment response and summary to the client. • Consultant's deliverables, including record drawings, are limited to the sealed and signed hard copies. Computer-generated drawing files furnished by CONSULTANT are for CITY or others' convenience.Any conclusions or information derived or obtained from these files will be at user's sole risk. • The CONSULTANT's ability to meet the schedule is contingent upon timely receipt of survey and any other information from the CITY and or third parties. • This project will be performed in conjunction with the Sunset stormwater infiltration facility project. • • Page 20 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Form s/City/Contracts E1-2012 Exhibit B - Time Schedule of Completion Harrington Ave NE Green Connections Project-Project Schedule Notice to Proceed February 2013 30% Design March 2013 60% Design June 2013 90%design September 2013 100% Design October 2013 • • Page 21 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 EXHIBIT C—Cost Estimate Task Descri Lion LOE Labor Expenses LA SUB Price 1 Project Management 162 $ 23,713 $ - $ 3,892 $ 27,605 2 Basemap Preparation and Supplemental Survey 256 $ 27,405 $ 10,203 $ 37,608 3 Public Involvement 28 $ 3,973 $ - $ 7,192 $ 11,165 4 H drol i raulic Modeling 124 $ 15,956 $ - $ - $ 15,956 5 Permit Support 24 $ 3,805 $ - $ 3,805 6 Final Design,Construction Documents,and Cost Estimate 749 $ 94,308 $ 260 $ 14,309 $ 108,876 7 Services During Bidding 40 $ 5,787 $ - $ 1,901 $ 7,688 Total 1 1383 $ 174,947 10,4631 $ 27,2931 $ 212,704 • • Page 22 of 26 Pia zza/Data_Center/Form s/City/Contracts E1-2012 • EXHIBIT C COST PLUS NET FEE DETERMINATION DIRECT SALARY COST: Hourly Rates of Pay* Personnel Project Delivery $73.54 Senior Engineer $60.40 Senior Geotechnical $59.60 Design Manager $55.64 Task Engineer $48.55 Survey Lead $44.35 Survey Technician $40.47 Survey Technician $32.91 Survey Technician $23.58 Cost Estimator $47.70 Design Engineer $40.14 Design Engineer $34.19 CADD Technician $38.72 • Geotechnical Engineer $34.13 Contracts Administration $33.76 Clerical $26.10 Accountant $24.97 *direct salary rates are subject to increase April 1,2013 Net Fee 20%of direct salary cost plus overhead DIRECT NON-SALARY COST: Travel and Per Diem Mileage @ IRS reimbursement rate, currently$.565/mile Per Diem: to be addressed if applicable under subsequent Amendment(s) Outside Reproduction Expenses .............................................................................$ cost Subconsultant/Lab Services ....................................................................................$ cost+2%markup SurveySupplies .......................................................................................................$ cost • Health &Safety........................................................................................................$ 1.75/hour for applicable staff Page 23 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 EXHIBIT C(cont.) . SUMMARY OF FEE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES BREAKDOWN OF OVERHEAD COST See attached Exhibit C Addendum SUMMARY OF COSTS Project No. Name of Project: Sunset Community LID Retrofit Project—Green Connection: Harrington Ave NE DirectSalary Cost...............................................................................................................................$58,433 Overhead Cost (including payroll additives................................................................................. 149.50% $87,357 Sub-Total $145,790 NetFee............................................................................................................ 20% $29,158 Direct Non-Salary Costs: a. Travel and per diem........................................................... $ 161 . b. Reproduction expenses..................................................... $ 225 c. Survey Supplies............................................................... $4,843 d. Outside consultants (Potholing) ..................................... $ 5,100 Outside consultants(BRCA)........................................... $27,292 e. Other(Health &Safety)......................................................$135 Total $ 37,756 Sub Total $ 66,914 GRAND TOTAL $ 212,704 • Page 24 of 26 Piazza/Data_Ce nter/Fo rms/City/Contra cts CITY OF RENTON SUMMARY OF FAIR PRACTICES POLICY ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 4085 It is the policy of the City of Renton to promote and provide equal treatment and service to all citizens and to ensure equal employment opportunity to all persons without regard to their race; religion/creed; national origin; ancestry; sex; age over 40; sexual orientation or gender identity; pregnancy; HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis C status; use of a guide dog/service animal; marital status; parental/family status; military status; or veteran's status, or the presence of a physical, sensory, or mental disability, when the City of Renton can reasonably accommodate the disability, of employees and applicants for employment and fair, non-discriminatory treatment to all citizens. All departments of the City of Renton shall adhere to the following guidelines: (1) EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES - The City of Renton will ensure all employment related activities included recruitment, selection, promotion, demotion, training, retention and separation are conducted in a manner which is based on job-related criteria which does not discriminate against women, minorities and other protected classes. Human resources decisions will be in accordance with individual performance, staffing requirements, governing civil service rules, and labor contract agreements. (2) COOPERATION WITH HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS - The City of Renton will cooperate fully with all organizations and commissions organized to promote fair practices and equal opportunity in employment. (3) CONTRACTORS' OBLIGATIONS - Contractors, sub-contractors, consultants and suppliers conducting business with the City of Renton shall affirm and subscribe to the Fair Practices and Non-discrimination policies set forth by the law and by City policy. Copies of this policy shall be distributed to all City employees, shall appear in all operational documentation of the City, including bid calls, and shall be prominently displayed in appropriate city facilities. CONCURRED IN by the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, this 7th day of March , 2011 CITY RENTON RENTON CITY COUNCIL Denis Law, Mayor uncil Pr ident Attest: Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk ' 2 Page 25 of 26 Piazza/Data_Center/Forms/City/Contracts E1-2012 -----_ Cit D Q nm0m .r�`. CITY OF RENTON FAIR PRACTICES POLICY AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE C;412-M -ft i t- t_ 5 1C�i Nt-��S� PVC . hereby confirms and declares that: (Name of contractor/subcontractor/consultant) I. It is the policy of the above-named contractor/subcontractor/consultant,to offer equal opportunity to all qualified employees and applicants for employment without regard to their race; religion/creed; national origin; ancestry; sex;the presence of a physical, sensory, or mental disability; age over 40; sexual orientation or gender identity; pregnancy; HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis C status; use of a guide dog/service animal; marital status; parental/family status; military status; or veteran's status. II. The above-named contractor/subcontractor/consultant complies with all applicable federal, state and local laws governing non-discrimination in employment. III. When applicable,the above-named contractor/subcontractor/consultant will seek out and negotiate with minority and women contractors for the award of subcontracts. yftkjej I?t!k 4.t 4( Print Agent/Representative's Name Al w optfthous utgk Print Agent/Representative's T.tie lwyl�a Agent/Representative's Signature I/L;1 (3 Date Signed Instructions: This document MUST be completed by each contractor, subcontractor, consultant and/or supplier. Include or attach this documents) with the contract. Page 26 of 26 Piazza/Data_Cente r/Form s/City/Co ntra cts • � E, DEPARTMENT OF 0 qmmw E,21" C �no L 0 G Y ' 4F State of Washington FY 2012 STATEWIDE STORMWATER GRANT PROGRAM-PROVISO FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND CITY OF RENTON GRANT AGREEMENT NUMBER G1200544 SUNSET TERRACE REGIONAL STORMWATER FACILITY • TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I. GENERAL INFORMATION........................................................ PART Il. PROJECT SUMMARY.................................................................................................. 3 PART III. PROJECT BUDGET..................................................................................................... 3 PART IV. PROJECT GOALS AND OUTCOMES ....................................................................... 4 PARTV. SCOPE OF WORK......................................................................................................... 4 PART VI. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS...................................................................... 8 PART VII. ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN.................................................................. 8 ATTACHMENT 1: GENERAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FY 2012 STORMWATER GRANT PROGRAM.............................................................................. 10 ARCHEOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES.........................................................................................................10 FUNDING RECOGNITION............................................................................................................................................10 INCREASEDOVERSIGHT.............................................................................................................................................10 INDIRECTRATE..........................................................................................................................................................10 MATCHINGREQUIREMENTS............................................................................................................... MINORITY AND WOMEN'S BUSINESS PARTICIPATION................................................................................................11 PAYMENT REQUEST SUBMITTALS........................................................................................... ....I I ............................... POST PROJECT ASSESSMENT......................................................................................................................................12 • PROCUREMENT..........................................................................................................................................................12 PROGRESSREPORTS..................................................................................................................................................13 1 • REQuamDOCUMENT SUBMITTALS.........................................................................................................................13 ATTACHMENT II: GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS PERTAINING TO GRANT AND LOAN AGREEMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY................................. 14 A.RECIPIENT PERFORMANCE...........................................................................................................................14 B.SUBGRANTEE/CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE.............................................................................................14 C.THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY.........................................................................................................................14 D.CONTRACTING FOR SERVICES(BIDDING).............................................................. .....14 .............................. E.ASSIGNMENTS..................................................................................................................................................14 F.COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS.....................................................................................................................14 G.KICKBACKS.......................................................................................................................................................15 H.AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS...........................................................................................................................15 I.PERFORMANCE REPORTING...........................................................................................................................15 J.COMPENSATION................................................................................................................................................16 K.TERMINATION..................................................................................................................................................17 L.WAIVER..............................................................................................................................................................17 M.PROPERTY RIGHTS..........................................................................................................................................17 N.SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTS...................................................................................................... ..........18 ............. O.RECOVERY OF PAYMENTS TO RECIPIENT.................................................................................................19 P.PROJECT APPROVAL........................................................................................................................................19 Q.DISPUTES...........................................................................................................................................................19 R.CONFLICT OF INTEREST.................................................................................................................................20 S.INDEMNIFICATION...........................................................................................................................................20 T.GOVERNING LAW.............................................................................................................................................20 U.SEVERABILITY.................................................................................................................................................20 V.PRECEDENCE....................................................................................................................................................20 • ii • FY 2012 STATEWIDE STORMWATER GRANT PROGRAM—PROVISO Funding Agreement Between THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AND CITY OF RENTON THIS is a binding agreement between the state of Washington Department of Ecology (DEPARTMENT)and the City of Renton(RECIPIENT). The purpose of this agreement is to provide funds to the RECIPIENT,who will carry out the requirements described in this agreement. PART I. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Title: Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility Grant Number: G1200544 State Fiscal Year: FY 2012 Total Project Cost: $1,310,667 Total Eligible Cost: $1,310,667 DEPARTMENT Share: $983,000 RECIPIENT Share: $327,667 DEPARTMENT Maximum Percentage: 75 % RECIPIENT Information RECIPIENT Name: City of Renton Mailing Address: 1055 S Grady Way Renton,WA 98057 Fax Number: 425-430-7248 Federal Taxpayer ID Number: 91-6001271 PROJECT Manager: Hebd C. Bernardo Email Address: hbernardogrentonwa.gov Phone Number: 425-430-7264 PROJECT Financial Officer: Lori Bevier Email Address: lbevier a rentonwa.gov Phone Number: 425-430-6933 • 1 • DEPARTMENT Contact Information Project Manager: Melisa Snoeberger Email Address: melisa.snoeberizer@ecy.wa.gov Phone Number: 425-649-7047 Project Engineer: Robert Nolan,P.E. Email Address: robert.nolan@ecy.wa.gov Phone Number: 425-649-7197 Address: ®Northwest ❑ Central WA State Department of Ecology WA State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office Central Regional Office 3190 160th Ave SE 15 West Yakima Ave, Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 Yakima, WA 98902-3452 Fax(425) 649-7098 Fax(509) 575-2809 ❑Southwest ❑Eastern • WA State Department of Ecology WA State Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office Eastern Regional Office P.O. Box 47775 N. 4601 Monroe Olympia, WA 98504-7775 Spokane, WA 99205-1295 Fax (360)407-6305 Fax(509)329-3570 ❑Bellingham ❑Headquarters WA State Department of Ecology WA State Department of Ecology Bellingham Field Office P.O. Box 47600 1440 10th Street, Suite 102 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Bellingham,WA 98225 Fax(360)407-6426 Fax (360) 715-5225 Financial Manager: Jennifer Holderman Email Address: jennifer.holderman@ecy.wa.gov Phone Number: 360-407-7196 Fax Number: 360-407-7151 Address: WA State Department of Ecology Water Quality Program, FMS P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 . 2 CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: • FY 2012 Stormwater Grant Funds(state funds): ® Yes Amount: $983,000 Funded with Local Toxics Control Account—State • Prior Authorization Granted: ® Yes If yes, Effective Date: May 1, 2012 • Increased Oversight? ❑Yes ®No The effective date of this agreement is the Prior Authorization date. This agreement expires: June 30,2015. Post Project Assessment date—three years after the expiration date of the agreement(see Post Project Assessment in Attachment I): June 30,2018 PART II. PROJECT SUMMARY This project will address water quality for the state of Washington. This regional stormwater facility will consist of flow control and water quality treatment facilities,providing treatment for stormwater runoff from Sunset Boulevard and adjacent streets. PART III. PROJECT BUDGET • Sunset Terrace Regional Stormwater Facility TASKS/OBJECTS TOTAL **TOTAL PROJECT ELIGIBLE COST COST(TEC) 1 - Project Administration/Management $47,800 $47,800 2 - Design Plans and Specifications $211,867 $211,867 3 - Construction Management $95,000 $95,000 4 - Construction $956,000 $956,000 Totaq $1,310,667 $1,310,667 *Y The DEPARTMENT's Fiscal Office will track to the Total Eligible Cost. • 3 MATCHING REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT Share: maximum 75%of TEC $983,000 RECIPIENT Share: minimum 25%of TEC Cash $327,667 $327,667 Other types of in-kind, such as volunteer work are not eligible PART IV. PROJECT GOALS AND OUTCOMES A. Financial Assistance Water Quality Project Goals: The overall goals of this project are focused on the protection of Johns Creek and include one or more of the following: ® Stormwater System Retrofit ® Low Impact Development Best Management Practices (BMP) ❑ Designated beneficial uses will be restored or protected, 303(d)-Listed water bodies restored to water quality standards,healthy waters prevented from being degraded. B. Water Quality and Environmental Outcomes: The following are the anticipated water quality and environmental improvements from the project. 1. Provide enhanced and basic water quality treatment and flow control for stormwater runoff prior to discharging into Johns Creek. • C. Performance Items and Deliverables: The following are the anticipated action items that will play an integral role in implementation of the project. 1. Install flow control and water quality treatment facilities. PART V. SCOPE OF WORD Task 1 -Project Administration/Management A. The RECIPIENT will administer the project. Responsibilities will include, but not be limited to: maintenance of project records; submittal of payment vouchers, fiscal forms, and progress reports; compliance with applicable procurement, contracting, and interlocal agreement requirements; application for,receipt of, and compliance with all required permits, licenses,easements, or property rights necessary for the project; and submittal of required performance items. B. The RECIPIENT must manage the project. Efforts will include: conducting, coordinating, and scheduling project activities and assuring quality control. Every effort will be made to maintain effective communication with the RECIPIENT's designees;the DEPARTMENT; all affected local, state, or federal jurisdictions; and any interested individuals or groups. The RECIPIENT must carry out this project in accordance with any completion dates outlined in this agreement. 4 • C. The RECIPIENT must ensure this project is completed according to the details of this agreement. The RECIPIENT may elect to use its own forces or it may contract for professional services necessary to perform and complete project-related work. Required Performance: 1. Effective administration and management of this grant project. 2. Timely submittal of all required performance items, progress reports, and financial vouchers. 3. Submit at least three hard copies and one electronic copy of the final project report after a draft has been approved by the DEPARTMENT. 4. Write and submit a one to two page summary of project accomplishments and outcomes at project completion,including pictures,to be published in the DEPARTMENT's Annual Water Quality Financial Assistance Report following the DEPARMENT's water quality stories format. Task 2—Design Plans and Specifications A. The RECIPIENT will submit to the DEPARTMENT's Project Manager, a copy of the State Environmental Review Act(SEPA)Lead Agency's signed and dated SEPA determination. • B. During the planning and design stage and prior to any ground disturbing activities,the RECIPIENT will submit to the DEPARTMENT's Project Manager one of the following: a. If Cultural Resources Review(Executive Order 05-05) is complete, a copy of the letter of concurrence from the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP)and correspondence from any tribes. b. If Cultural Resources Review(Executive Order 05-05) is not complete,the RECIPIENT will submit a DAHP EZ-1 form to the DEPARTMENT's Project Manager to initiate review of project activities by DAHP and tribal governments. C. The RECIPIENT will submit two hard copies and one digital copy of the Pre-design report to the DEPARTMENT for review. At its discretion,the DEPARTMENT may request 60 percent complete design plans for review. Based on receipt of the Pre-design report or the 60 percent complete design plans,the DEPARTMENT will provide comments to the RECIPIENT within 45 days of receipt of the plans. D. Prior to advertising for contractor bids,the RECIPIENT will submit two hard copies and one digital copy of the final plans and specifications to the DEPARTMENT's Project Manager for review. The DEPARTMENT will provide comments to the RECIPIENT within 45 days of receipt of the plans. The DEPARTMENT's Project.Manager will work with the DEPARTMENT's engineer to review the plans and specifications for consistency with the appropriate design criteria and grant requirements. The RECIPIENT must justify significant deviations from the following: 5 • 1. The appropriate guidance manual below depends on the region that your project is conducted: Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington(SWMMWW), or the Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington(SWMMEW), both can be found at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wg/stonnwater/tech.html, or the Low Impact Development Technical Guidance Manual for Puget Sound found at: http://www.psp.wa.gov/downloads/LID/LID manual2005.pdf, or equivalent design manuals,or 2. Equivalent manual as developed by the local jurisdiction and approved by the DEPARTMENT. 3. Good engineering practices and generally recognized engineering standards. 4. The project pre-design report. E. The plans, specifications, construction contract documents, and addenda must be approved by the RECIPIENT prior to submittal to the DEPARTMENT. F. The RECIPIENT will prepare and submit a projected construction schedule to the DEPARTMENT. G. The RECIPIENT will submit to the DEPARTMENT a current,updated construction cost estimate and updated project schedule, along with each plans and specifications • submittal. H. The RECIPIENT will submit all pre-design figures and construction plans to the DEPARTMENT,reduced to 11" x 17" in size. The RECIPIENT may bind them with the specifications or related construction contract documents or bound as a separate document. All reduced drawings must be legible. I. The RECIPIENT will develop and submit an operations and maintenance plan for the stormwater treatment and low impact development(LID)features. The operation and maintenance plan will describe how the RECIPIENT will ensure project success consistent with the design manual used. The operation and maintenance plan must also address long term activities to assure ongoing pollutant removal and flow-control capability of the project. (See the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington Volume 5, Section 4.6.) Required Performance: 1. Submit a copy of the signed and dated SEPA determination to the DEPARTMENT. 2. Submit a copy of either: 1) Letter of Concurrence from DAHP; or,2)the DAHP EZ-1 form,for DEPARTMENT coordination on compliance with Executive Order 05-05. 3. Submit a Pre-design report to the DEPARTMENT. 6 • 4. Submit final plans and specifications to the DEPARTMENT,which include the DEPARTMENT's Bid Specification Clauses Inserts,found at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/l)rograms/w rrttDocs/En /GrantLo anMgmtEngRes.html Task 3—Construction Manalzement A. The RECIPIENT will provide construction oversight and management of the project. B. The RECIPIENT will submit a detailed construction quality assurance plan to the DEPARTMENT before the start of construction. This plan must describe how adequate and competent construction oversight will be performed. C. The RECIPIENT will submit a construction schedule to the DEPARTMENT within 30 days of the start of construction. The construction schedule will be revised and/or updated whenever major changes occur and at a minimum of every three months. The RECIPIENT will submit the construction schedule to the DEPARTMENT with the quarterly report. When changes in the construction schedule affect previous cash flow estimates,revised cash flow projections must also be submitted to the DEPARTMENT. D. Prior to execution,the RECIPIENT will submit eligible change orders that are a significant deviation from the DEPARTMENT reviewed plans and specifications in • writing for DEPARTMENT review and approval for payment. All other change orders must be approved by the DEPARTMENT for technical merit and should be submitted within 30 days after execution. Change orders are to be signed by the contractor,the engineer(if appropriate), and the RECIPIENT prior to submittal to the DEPARTMENT for approval. E. Upon completion of construction,the RECIPIENT will provide to the DEPARTMENT's Project Manager a Stormwater Construction Completion Form signed by a professional engineer, indicating that the project was completed in accordance with the plans and specifications and major change orders approved by the DEPARTMENT's Project Engineer and shown on the Record Drawings. The Stormwater Construction Completion form can be found at: hitp://www.cey.wa.gov/programs/wg/funding/GrantLoanM gmtDocs/Eng/G•antLoanMgmtEngRes.httnl Required Performance: 1. Submit the project construction quality assurance plan to the DEPARTMENT. 2. Submit the construction schedule to the DEPARTMENT. 3. Submit the signed and dated Declaration of Construction Completion Form to the DEPARTMENT. Task 4—Construction A. The RECIPIENT will construct, in accordance with the reviewed plans and specifications, a regional stormwater facility. 7 B. The RECIPIENT will submit to the DEPARTMENT's Project Manager a copy of the construction contract within 30 days of execution. Required Performance: 1. Submit a copy of the bid documents (e.g. bid announcement,bid award,bid tabulations)to the DEPARTMENT. 2. Submit a copy of the construction contract to the DEPARTMENT. 3. Install flow control and water quality treatment facilities. PART VI.SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS A. Adjusted Construction Budget. The construction budget, as reflected in the agreement, will be adjusted once actual construction bids are received. If the low responsive responsible construction bid(s)exceed the engineer's estimate of construction costs,the DEPARTMENT may approve,if funding is available and through formal amendment to this agreement,funding increases for up to ten percent of the engineer's original estimate. If the low responsive responsible construction bid(s)come in lower than the engineer's estimate of construction costs,the DEPARTMENT may reduce the grant amount. B. Change Orders. If funding is available,the DEPARTMENT may approve,through formal amendment to this agreement,funding for change orders for up to five percent of the eligible portion of the low responsive responsible construction bid(s). C. Documents for Review. The plans, specifications,construction contract documents, and addenda must be approved by the RECIPIENT prior to submittal for DEPARTMENT review. D. Failure to Commence Work. In the event the RECIPIENT fails to commence work on the project within four months of the signatory date,the DEPARTMENT reserves the right to terminate this agreement. E. Use of Force Account. In the event the RECIPIENT elects to use its own forces to accomplish eligible project work,the RECIPIENT acknowledges that it has the legal authority to perform the work and adequate and technically qualified staff to perform the work without compromising other government functions. The RECIPIENT must track and report the force account work submitted to the DEPARTMENT for reimbursement. PART VII. ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN The following contain the entire understanding between the parties,and there are no other understandings or representations other than as set forth,or incorporated by reference,herein: • This agreement. 8 • • Attachment I: General Project Management Requirements. • Attachment II: General Terms and Conditions. • The effective edition, at the signing of this agreement,of the DEPARTMENT's "Administrative Requirements for Ecology Grants and Loans" (Yellow Book). • The associated funding guidelines that correspond to the fiscal year in which the project is funded. • The applicable statutes and regulations. No subsequent modifications or amendments of this agreement will be of any force or effect unless signed by authorized representatives of the RECIPIENT and the DEPARTMENT and made a part of this agreement,EXCEPT that in response to"a request from the RECIPIENT,the DEPARTMENT may redistribute the grant budget. The DEPARTMENT or the RECIPIENT may change their respective staff contacts without the concurrence of either parry. The RECIPIENT acknowledges that they have had the opportunity to thoroughly review the terms of this agreement,the attachments, all incorporated or referenced documents, as well as all applicable statutes,rules, and guidelines mentioned in this agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereby sign this agreement: STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF RF,NTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY KELLY SUSEWIND, P.E., P.G. DATE DENIS LAW DATE.,........... WATER QUALITY PROGRAM MANAGER MAYOR ATTEST: BONNIE I. WALTON DATE CITY CLERK Approved As To Form: Office of the Attorney General 9 ATTACHMENT I: GENERAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE FY 2012 STORMWATER GRANT PROGRAM ARCHEOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES The RECIPIENT must comply with all requirements listed in Executive Order 05-05 prior to implementing any project that involves ground disturbing activities. The RECIPIENT must conduct and submit a cultural resources survey or complete and submit an EZ-1 Form to the DEPARTMENT's project manager prior to any ground disturbing activities. The DEPARTMENT will contact the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) and affected tribes regarding the proposed project activities in order to fulfill Executive Order 05-05 requirements. Any prior communication between the RECIPIENT,the DAHP, and the tribes is not sufficient to meet requirements. Any mitigation measures as an outcome of this process will be requirements of this agreement. Another agency's cultural resources review must have prior approval from the DEPARTMENT in order to be adopted to meet Executive Order 05-05 requirements for the project. Any ground disturbing activities that occur prior to the completion of the Executive Order 05-05 process will not be eligible for reimbursement. Activities associated with cultural resources review are grant eligible and reimbursable. http://www.dahp.wa.gov/govemors-executive-order-05-05 FUNDING RECOGNITION The RECIPIENT must inform the public about DEPARTMENT or the Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)funding participation in this project through the use of project signs, acknowledgement in published materials, reports, the news media, or other public announcements. Projects addressing site-specific locations must utilize appropriately sized and weather-resistant signs. Sign logos are available from the DEPARTMENT upon request. INCREASED OVERSIGHT If this project is selected for increased oversight(as indicated on page 3 of this agreement),the RECIPIENT must submit all backup documentation with each payment request submittal. In addition,the DEPARTMENT's Project Manager must establish a schedule for additional site visits to provide technical assistance to the RECIPIENT and verify progress or payment information. INDIRECT RATE To acknowledge overhead costs,the RECIPIENT may charge an indirect rate of up to 25 percent based on employees' direct salary and benefit costs incurred while conducting project-related work. The DEPARTMENT's Financial Manager may require a list of items included in the indirect rate at any time. 10 MATCHING REQUIREMENTS Cash Match Requirement. FY 2011 Stormwater Retrofit and LID Competitive grants and FY 2012 Statewide Stormwater Grant Program require cash match only. Interlocal Match Requirement. The RECIPIENT certifies by signing this agreement that all negotiated interlocal agreements are consistent with all of the following: • Terms of this grant agreement. • The edition of"Administrative Requirements for Ecology Grants and Loans"that is effective at the signing of this agreement. • Chapter 39.34 RCW Interlocal Cooperation Act. MINORITY AND WOMEN'S BUSINESS PARTICIPATION The RECIPIENT agrees to solicit and recruit,to the extent possible, certified minority-owned (MBE) and women-owned(WBE)businesses in purchases and contracts initiated after the effective date of this agreement. Contract awards or rejections cannot be made based on MBE or WBE participation. M/WBE participation is encouraged,however,and the RECIPIENT and all prospective bidders or persons submitting qualifications should take the following steps,when possible, in any procurement initiated after the effective date of this agreement: • a) Include qualified minority and women's businesses on solicitation lists. b) Assure that qualified minority and women's businesses are solicited whenever they are potential sources of services or supplies. c) Divide the total requirements, when economically feasible, into smaller tasks or quantities,to permit maximum participation by qualified minority and women's businesses. d) Establish delivery schedules,where work requirements permit, which will encourage participation of qualified minority and women's businesses. e) Use the services and assistance of the State Office of Minority and Women's Business Enterprises(OMWBE) and the Office of Minority Business Enterprises of the U.S. Department of Commerce, as appropriate. The RECIPIENT must report to the DEPARTMENT at the time of submitting each invoice, on forms provided by the DEPARTMENT(Form D),payments made to qualified firms. Please include the following information: a) Name and state OMWBE certification number(if available) of any qualified firm receiving funds under the invoice, including any sub-and/or sub-subcontractors. b) The total dollar amount paid to qualified firms under this invoice. • PAYMENT REQUEST SUBMITTALS 11 • FrequencX. The RECIPIENT must submit payment requests at least quarterly but no more often than monthly,unless allowed by the DEPARTMENT's Financial Manager. The DEPARTMENT's Financial Manager may require the RECIPIENT to submit regular payment requests to ensure efficient and timely use of funds. Supporting Documentation. The RECIPIENT must submit all payment request vouchers and supportive documentation to the DEPARTMENT's Financial Manager. Payment request voucher submittals are based on match requirements found in the budget. Required Forms. Any Match Combination Cash Only Match Where Applicable Form A19-1A(original signature) Form A19-1A(original signature) Form E(ECY 060-12) Form B1 (ECY 060-3) Form B2 (ECY 060-7) Form F (ECY 060-13) Form C1 (ECY 060-8) Form C2 (ECY 060-9) Form H(F-21) Form D (ECY 060-11) Form D (ECY 060-11) Form I(ECY 060-15) Reporting eligible costs. The RECIPIENT must report all eligible costs incurred on the project, regardless of the source of funding for those costs. This includes costs used as match. All eligible and ineligible project costs must be separate and identifiable. Reimbursements. Payments will be made on a cost-reimbursable basis. • POST PROJECT ASSESSMENT The RECIPIENT agrees to submit a brief survey regarding the key project results or water quality project outcomes and the status of long-term environmental results or goals from the project three years after project completion. The DEPARTMENT's Water Quality Program Performance Measures Lead will contact the RECIPIENT before the Post Project Assessment date to request this data. The DEPARTMENT may also conduct site interviews and inspections, and may otherwise evaluate the Project, as part of this assessment. PROCUREMENT The RECIPIENT certifies by signing this agreement that all applicable requirements have been satisfied in the procurement of any professional services. 12 • PROGRESS REPORTS The RECIPIENT must submit quarterly progress reports to the DEPARTMENT's Financial Manager and Project Manager. Payment requests will not be processed without a progress report. Reporting Periods. • January 1 through March 31 • April 1 through June 30 • July 1 through September 30 • October 1 through December 31 Reporting Due Date. Quarterly progress reports are due 15 days following the end of the quarter. Report Content. At a minimum, all progress reports must contain a comparison of actual accomplishments to the objectives established for the period,the reasons for delay if established objectives were not met, analysis and explanation of any cost overruns, and any additional pertinent information specified in this agreement. REQUIRED DOCUMENT SUBMITTALS • The RECIPIENT must submit the following documents to the DEPARTMENT as requested by the DEPARTMENT's Project Manager or Financial Manager: • Draft project completion reports—one copy • Electronic copy of final project completion report—one copy • Final project completion reports—up to three copies • Final project completion reports of statewide significance—up to 50 copies • Educational products developed under this agreement—up to two copies • Documents that require DEPARTMENT Approval—two copies (one for the DEPARTMENT and one for the RECIPIENT) • Interlocal agreements—one copy for the DEPARTMENT's Financial Manager • Professional services procurement agreements— 1 copy to the DEPARTMENT's Financial Manager • 13 ATTACHMENT II: GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS PERTAINING TO GRANT AND LOAN AGREEMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY A.RECIPIENT PERFORMANCE All activities for which grant/loan funds are to be used shall be accomplished by the RECIPIENT and RECIPIENT's employees. The RECIPIENT shall only use contractor/consultant assistance if that has been included in the agreement's final scope of work and budget. . B. SUBGRANTEE/CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE The RECIPIENT must ensure that all subgrantees and contractors comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement. C.THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY The RECIPIENT shall ensure that in all subcontracts entered into by the RECIPIENT pursuant to this agreement,the state of Washington is named as an express third-party beneficiary of such subcontracts with full rights as such. D. CONTRACTING FOR SERVICES(BIDDING) Contracts for construction,purchase of equipment and professional architectural and engineering services shall be awarded through a competitive process, if required by State law. RECIPIENT shall retain copies of all bids received and contracts awarded, for inspection and use by the • DEPARTMENT. E.ASSIGNMENTS No right or claim of the RECIPIENT arising under this agreement shall be transferred or assigned by the RECIPIENT. F. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS 1. The RECIPIENT shall comply fully with all applicable Federal, State and local laws,orders, regulations and permits. Prior to commencement of any construction,the RECIPIENT shall secure the necessary approvals and permits required by authorities having jurisdiction over the project,provide assurance to the DEPARTMENT that all approvals and permits have been secured,and make copies available to the DEPARTMENT upon request. 2. Discrimination. The DEPARTMENT and the RECIPIENT agree to be bound by all Federal and State laws,regulations,and policies against discrimination. The RECIPIENT further agrees to affirmatively support the program of the Office of Minority and Women's Business Enterprises to the maximum extent possible. If the agreement is federally-funded,the RECIPIENT shall report to the DEPARTMENT the percent of grant/loan funds available to women or minority owned businesses. 3. Wages and Job Safety. The RECIPIENT agrees to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and policies of the United States and the state of Washington which affect wages and job safety. • 14 • 4. Industrial Insurance. The RECIPIENT certifies full compliance with all applicable state industrial insurance requirements. If the RECIPIENT fails to comply with such laws,the DEPARTMENT shall have the right to immediately terminate this agreement for cause as provided in Section K.1,herein. G.KICKBACKS The RECIPIENT is prohibited from inducing by any means any person employed or otherwise involved in this project to give up any part of the compensation to which he/she is otherwise entitled or,receive any fee, commission or gift in return for award of a subcontract hereunder. H.AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS 1. The RECIPIENT shall maintain complete program and financial records relating to this agreement. Such records shall clearly indicate total receipts and expenditures by fund source and task or object. All grant/loan records shall be kept in a manner which provides an audit trail for all expenditures. All records shall be kept in a common file to facilitate audits and inspections. Engineering documentation and field inspection reports of all construction work accomplished under this agreement shall be maintained by the RECIPIENT. 2. All grant/loan records shall be open for audit or inspection by the DEPARTMENT or by any duly authorized audit representative of the state of Washington for a period of at least three years after the final grant payment/loan repayment or any dispute resolution hereunder. If any such audits identify discrepancies in the financial records, the RECIPIENT shall provide clarification and/or make adjustments accordingly. 3. All work performed under this agreement and any equipment purchased, shall be made available to the DEPARTMENT and to any authorized state, federal or local representative for inspection at any time during the course of this agreement and for at least three years following grant/loan termination or dispute resolution hereunder. 4. RECIPIENT shall meet the provisions in OMB Circular A-133 (Audits of States, Local Governments &Non Profit Organizations), including the compliance Supplement to OMB Circular A-133, if the RECIPIENT expends $500,000 or more in a year in Federal funds. The $500,000 threshold for each year is a cumulative total of all federal funding from all sources. The RECIPIENT must forward a copy of the audit along with the RECIPIENT'S response and the final corrective action plan to the DEPARTMENT within 90 days of the date of the audit report. I.PERFORMANCE REPORTING The RECIPIENT shall submit progress reports to the DEPARTMENT with each payment request or such other schedule as set forth in the Special Conditions. The RECIPIENT shall also report in writing to the DEPARTMENT any problems, delays or adverse conditions which will materially affect their ability to meet project.objectives or time schedules. This disclosure shall be accompanied by a statement of the action taken or proposed and any assistance needed from the DEPARTMENT to resolve the situation. Payments may be withheld if required progress reports are not submitted. Quarterly reports shall cover the periods January 1 through March 31, 15 • April 1 through June 30,July 1 through September 30,and October 1 through December 31. Reports shall be due within 30 days following the end of the quarter being reported. J. COMPENSATION 1. Method of compensation. Payment shall normally be made on a reimbursable basis as specified in the grant agreement and no more often than once per month. Each request for payment will be submitted by the RECIPIENT on State voucher request forms provided by the DEPARTMENT along with documentation of the expenses. Payments shall be made for each task/phase of the project,or portion thereof, as set out in the Scope of Work when completed by the RECIPIENT and approved as satisfactory by the Project Officer. The payment request form and supportive documents must itemize all allowable costs by major elements as described in the Scope of Work. Instructions for submitting the payment requests are found in "Administrative Requirements for Ecology Grants and Loans",part IV,published by the DEPARTMENT.A copy of this document shall be furnished to the RECIPIENT. When payment requests are approved by the DEPARTMENT,payments will be made to the mutually agreed upon designee. Payment requests shall be submitted to the DEPARTMENT and directed to the Project Officer assigned to administer this agreement. 2. Period of Compensation.Payments shall only be made for actions of the RECIPIENT pursuant to the grant/loan agreement and performed after the effective date and prior to the expiration date of this agreement,unless those dates are specifically modified in writing as provided herein. • 3. Final Request(s)for Payment. The RECIPIENT should submit final requests for compensation within forty-five (45) days after the expiration date of this agreement and within fifteen(15) days after the end of a fiscal biennium. Failure to comply may result in delayed reimbursement. 4. Performance Guarantee. The DEPARTMENT may withhold an amount not to exceed ten percent(10%)of each reimbursement payment as security for the RECIPIENT's performance. Monies withheld by the DEPARTMENT may be paid to the RECIPIENT when the project(s)described herein,or a portion thereof,have been completed if,in the DEPARTMENT's sole discretion, such payment is reasonable and approved according to this agreement and, as appropriate,upon completion of an audit as specified under section J.6. herein. 5. Unauthorized Expenditures. All payments to the RECIPIENT may be subject to final audit by the DEPARTMENT and any unauthorized expenditure(s) charged to this grant/loan shall be refunded to the DEPARTMENT by the RECIPIENT. 6. Mileage and Per Diem. If mileage and per diem are paid to the employees of the RECIPIENT or other public entities, it shall not exceed the amount allowed under state law for state employees. 7. Overhead Costs. No reimbursement for overhead costs shall be allowed unless provided for in the Scope of Work hereunder. 16 • K.TERMINATION 1. For Cause. The obligation of the DEPARTMENT to the RECIPIENT is contingent upon satisfactory performance by the RECIPIENT of all of its obligations under this agreement. In the event the RECIPIENT unjustifiably fails, in the opinion of the DEPARTMENT,to perform any obligation required of it by this agreement, the DEPARTMENT may refuse to pay any further funds there under and/or terminate this agreement by giving written notice of termination. A written notice of termination shall be given at least five working days prior to the effective date of termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data studies, surveys, drawings,maps,models,photographs, and reports or other materials prepared by the RECIPIENT under this agreement, at the option of the DEPARTMENT, shall become Department property and the RECIPIENT shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials. Despite the above,the RECIPIENT shall not be relieved of any liability to the DEPARTMENT for damages sustained by the DEPARTMENT and/or the State of Washington because of any breach of agreement by the RECIPIENT. The DEPARTMENT may withhold payments for the purpose of setoff until such time as the exact amount of damages due the DEPARTMENT from the RECIPIENT is determined. 2. Insufficient Funds. The obligation of the DEPARTMENT to make payments is contingent on the availability of state and federal funds through legislative appropriation and state • allotment. When this agreement crosses over state fiscal years the obligation of the DEPARTMENT is contingent upon the appropriation of funds during the next fiscal year. The failure to appropriate or allot such funds shall be good cause to terminate-this agreement as provided in paragraph K.1 above. When this agreement crosses the RECIPIENT's fiscal year,the obligation of the RECIPIENT to continue or complete the project described herein shall be contingent upon appropriation of funds by the RECIPIENT's governing body;provided,however,that nothing contained herein shall preclude the DEPARTMENT from demanding repayment of ALL funds paid to the RECIPIENT in accordance with Section O herein. 3. Failure to Commence Work. In the event the RECIPIENT fails to commence work on the project funded herein within four months after the effective date of this agreement, or by any date agreed upon in writing for commencement of work,the DEPARTMENT reserves the right to terminate this agreement. L. WAIVER Waiver of any RECIPIENT default is not a waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver of a breach of any provision of this agreement is not a waiver of any subsequent breach and will not be construed as a modification of the terms of this agreement unless stated as such in writing by the authorized representative of the DEPARTMENT. M.PROPERTY RIGHTS 1. Copyrights and Patents. When the RECIPIENT creates any copyrightable materials or • invents any patentable property, the RECIPIENT may copyright or patent the same but the 17 DEPARTMENT retains a royalty-free,nonexclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish,recover or otherwise use the material(s)or property and to authorize others to use the same for federal, state or local government purposes. Where federal funding is involved,the federal government may have a proprietary interest in patent rights to any inventions that are developed by the RECIPIENT as provided in 35 U.S.C.200-212. 2. Publications. When the RECIPIENT or persons employed by the RECIPIENT use or publish information of the DEPARTMENT;present papers, lectures,or seminars involving information supplied by the DEPARTMENT;use logos,reports,maps or other data, in printed reports, signs,brochures,pamphlets, etc., appropriate credit shall be given to the DEPARTMENT. 3. Tangible Property Rights. The DEPARTMENT's current edition of"Administrative Requirements for Ecology Grants.and Loans",Part V, shall control the use and disposition of all real and personal property purchased wholly or in part with funds furnished by the DEPARTMENT in the absence of state,federal statute(s),regulation(s),or policy(s)to the contrary or upon specific instructions with respect thereto in the Scope of Work. 4. Personal Property Furnished by the DEPARTMENT. When the DEPARTMENT provides personal property directly to the RECIPIENT for use in performance of the project, it shall be returned to the DEPARTMENT prior to final payment by the DEPARTMENT. If said property is lost, stolen or damaged while in the RECIPIENT's possession, the DEPARTMENT shall be reimbursed in cash or by setoff by the RECIPIENT for the fair market value of such property. 5. Acquisition Projects. The following provisions shall apply if the project covered by this • agreement includes funds for the acquisition of land or facilities: a. Prior to disbursement of funds provided for in this agreement,the RECIPIENT shall establish that the cost of land/or facilities is fair and reasonable. b. The RECIPIENT shall provide satisfactory evidence of title or ability to acquire title for each parcel prior to disbursement of funds provided by this agreement. Such evidence may include title insurance policies, Torrens certificates,or abstracts, and attorney's opinions establishing that the land is free from any impediment, lien, or claim which would impair the uses contemplated by this agreement. 6. Conversions. Regardless of the contract termination date shown on the cover sheet,the RECIPIENT shall not at any time convert any equipment,property or facility acquired or developed pursuant to this agreement to uses other than those for which assistance was originally approved without prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT. Such approval may be conditioned upon payment to the DEPARTMENT of that portion of the proceeds of the sale,lease or other conversion or encumbrance which monies granted pursuant to this agreement bear to the total acquisition,purchase or construction costs of such property. N. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTS In order to sustain Washington's natural resources and ecosystems,the RECIPIENT is encouraged to implement sustainable practices where and when possible. These practices include 18 • use of clean energy, and purchase and use of sustainably produced products (e.g .,recycled paper). For more information, see http://www.ecy.wa.gov/sustaiiiabilit . O.RECOVERY OF PAYMENTS TO RECIPIENT The right of the RECIPIENT to retain monies paid to it as reimbursement payments is contingent upon satisfactory performance of this agreement including the satisfactory completion of the project described in the Scope of Work. In the event the RECIPIENT fails, for any reason,to perform obligations required of it by this agreement,the RECIPIENT may, at the DEPARTMENT's sole discretion,be required to repay to the DEPARTMENT all grant/loan funds disbursed to the RECIPIENT for those parts of the project that are rendered worthless in the opinion of the DEPARTMENT by such failure to perform. Interest shall accrue at the rate of twelve percent per year from the time the DEPARTMENT demands repayment of funds. If payments have been discontinued by the DEPARTMENT due to insufficient funds as in Section K.2 above,the RECIPIENT shall not be obligated to repay monies which had been paid to the RECIPIENT prior to such termination. Any property acquired under this agreement, at the option of the DEPARTMENT, may become the DEPARTMENT'S property and the RECIPIENT'S liability to repay monies shall be reduced by an amount reflecting the fair value of such property. P.PROJECT APPROVAL The extent and character of all work and services to be performed under this agreement by the • RECIPIENT shall be subject to the review and approval of the DEPARTMENT through the Project Officer or other designated official to whom the RECIPIENT shall report and be responsible. In the event there is a dispute with regard to the extent and character of the work to be done,the determination of the Project Officer or other designated official as to the extent and character of the work to be done shall govern. The RECIPIENT shall have the right to appeal decisions as provided for below. Q.DISPUTES Except as otherwise provided in this agreement, any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this agreement which is not disposed of in writing shall be decided by the Project Officer or other designated official who shall provide a written statement of decision to the RECIPIENT. The decision of the Project Officer or other designated official shall be final and conclusive unless, within thirty days from the date of receipt of such statement,the RECIPIENT mails or otherwise furnishes to the Director of the DEPARTMENT a written appeal. In connection with appeal of any proceeding under this clause,the RECIPIENT shall have the opportunity to be heard and to offer evidence in support of this appeal. The decision of the Director or duly authorized representative for the determination of such appeals shall be final and conclusive. Appeals from the Director's determination shall be brought in the Superior Court of Thurston County. Review of the decision of the Director will not be sought before either the Pollution Control Hearings Board or the Shoreline Hearings Board. Pending final decision of dispute hereunder, the RECIPIENT shall proceed diligently with the performance of this agreement and in accordance with the decision rendered. • 19 R. CONFLICT OF INTEREST • No officer,member, agent, or employee of either parry to this agreement who exercises any function or responsibility in the review,approval, or carrying out of this agreement, shall participate in any decision which affects his/her personal interest or the interest of any corporation,partnership or association in which he/she is, directly or indirectly interested;nor shall he/she have any personal or pecuniary interest, direct or indirect, in this agreement or the proceeds thereof. S.INDEMNIFICATION 1. The DEPARTMENT shall in no way be held responsible for payment of salaries,consultant's fees, and other costs related to the project described herein,except as provided in the Scope of Work. 2. To the extent that the Constitution and laws of the State of Washington permit,each party shall indemnify and hold the other harmless from and against any liability for any or all injuries to persons or property arising from the negligent act or omission of that party or that party's agents or employees arising out of this agreement. T. GOVERNING LAW This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. U. SEVERABILITY • If any provision of this agreement or any provision of any document incorporated by reference shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this agreement which can be given effect without the invalid provision, and to this end the provisions of this agreement are declared to be severable. V. PRECEDENCE In the event of inconsistency in this agreement, unless otherwise provided herein,the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: (a)applicable Federal and State statutes and regulations; (b) Scope of Work; (c) Special Terms and Conditions; (d)Any terms incorporated herein by reference including the "Administrative Requirements for Ecology Grants and Loans";and(e)the General Terms and Conditions. SS-010 Rev. 04/04 20 ` 1 2 3 4 5 SITE PLAN LEGEND schemata (E) EXISTING z I (ALL PROPOSED UNLESS workshop W 1 I W / U 1 i: ' w OTHERWISE NOTED) JJ p i I Q I i I i i I Q I i/ (E)PROPERTY LINE TO BE REMOVED architect Schemata Workshop,Inc. (E)PROPERTY LINE TO REMAIN D 1720 12th Avenue:k3CD CD Seattle,WA 98122 C� PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE 1 Z I CONTACT Grace Kim,AIA -————— SETBACK LINE v 205)2851589 I ,, . ,", _ _ _ ,SETBAC `: Q / // - DEMOLISHED ELEMENT t12061285.2701 I L7 t (E)BUILDING TO REMAIN owner Renton Housing 9 Authority \�V / P.O.BOX 2316 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 2900 NEW 10TH STREET REON,W OPPER A98056 / PROPOSED PLANTING STRIP CONTACT: � -- l/'. MRG®RENTONHOUSING.ORG V / 425.226 1850 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING ALONG STREET FRONTAGE ml / / RECREATION AREAS AND COMMON OPEN SPACE SITE AREA EASEMENT 17,650 sf / ;.I �� / / _ , i _ ' '�' PAVING . c \ VIEW _ \ \ \ \PLATFORM r _ RHA SUNSET v ° �� �k��y� TERRACE Z—Z 1 t \ �1 PLANNING V\, PRINT DATE 03/19/2013 \ l REVISION SCHEDULE B \ \ \ .\ \ DATE DESCRIPTION 17 \ \ \ PROJECT ISSUE DATES t C3 4/ / 1303 Author_SI&KW Checker:GK A SITE PLAN SITE PLAN �C/t/ A001 1•=50'-0' 1 2 3 4 5 Copyright Schemata Workshop,Inc. Citv of DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: April 2, 2013 TO: Rocale Timmons, Planner FROM: Jan Illian, Plan Review 91, SUBJECT: RHA Sunset Terrace Sunset Lane NE PRE 13-000306 NOTE:The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary is preliminary and non- binding and may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official city decision-makers. Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. • I have completed a preliminary review for the above-referenced proposal. The following comments are based on the pre-application submittal made to the City of Renton by the applicant. Water 1. The maximum available capacity(in GPM) at 20 psi residual pressure from existing City's water mains (6-inch diameter) in the vicinity of development site is 1,500 gpm. The proposed development is currently within the City 435-water pressure zone, which is a low water pressure zone with limited fire flow capacity. In order to increase the water pressure and fire flow capacity to meet demand for development and redevelopment projects in the "Sunset Area Community', new water mains connecting to the higher 565-water pressure zone must be extended through the area. Additional water main improvements will be required to provide the required fire flow demand and additional water pressure for the development. A conceptual layout of the water main extensions is included. 2. Extension of about 360 feet of 12-inch watermain in Glenwood Ave NE from an existing 12-inch watermain along the south property line of Glenwood Townhomes (see City water project plan no. W- 3606) to the proposed NE 10th St roadway. 3. Extension of about 780 feet of 12-inch watermain in Sunset lane NE from the above new water main to Harrington Ave NE, and about 150 feet of 12-inch main in Harrington Ave NE from Sunset Lane NE and connecting to an existing 12-inch water stub at the northeast corner of Sunset Blvd NE and Harrington Ave NE (see City water project W-3179). 4. Extension of about 275 feet of 12-inch watermain in NE 10th St from Glenwood Ave NE to Harrington Ave NE and about 130 feet of 12-inch watermain from NE 10th St to the north property line of buildings • 16/17. Suns?t Lane—PRE 13-000306 Page 2 of 4 April 9,2013 • 5. Installation of fire hydrants (200 feet maximum spacing between hydrants) as required based on final fire flow requirements (one hydrant for every 1,000 gpm of fire flow demand). Location of hydrants shall be determined based on final site plan and access. 6. Backflow prevention assembly (DDCVA) will be required for fire sprinkler system (refer to City Standard Details for external DDCVA in vault or for special requirements for DDCVA inside building). 7. Domestic water meters required (meter sizing per Uniform Plumbing Code). A separate domestic water meter is required for each townhome unit and one large meter for the apartment building. 8. Individual pressure reducing valve required downstream of each domestic water meter since static pressure from the new higher pressure water main will be above 80 psi. 9. Backflow Prevention Assembly (DCVA) will be required behind each domestic water meter for each townhome unit, for townhomes with 3 or more story. 10. A separate water meter and backflow prevention assembly (DCVA) is required for the landscape irrigation system. 11. Water system development charges for new water meters, and fire sprinkler connections will be triggered based on size and number of meters. 12. Redevelopment credit for water system development charges is applicable and will be based on the number and size of the existing water meters to the existing buildings within the subject property to be redeveloped, and the existing meters will be abandoned as part of the redevelopment project. • Sanitary Sewer 1. Installation of an 8-inch sewer main will be required in Sunset Lane and extended into the new future roadway of NE loth. Final design of the sewer main will be determined prior to site plan submittal. 2. Sewer system development fees will be based on the size of the domestic water(s). This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. See fee schedule attached. Storm Drainage 1. There are no storm drainage improvements in Sunset Lane. 2. A drainage plan and drainage report will be required with the site plan application. The report shall comply with the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual and the 2009 City of Renton Amendments to the KCSWM, Chapter 1 and 2. All core and any special requirements shall be contained in the report. Based on the City's flow control map, this site falls within the Peak Rate Flow Control Standard, Existing Site Conditions. The drainage report will need to follow the area specific flow control requirements under Core Requirement#3. 3. The boundary for the development site shall be shown in an exhibit; and shall include the limits of work and development included in this project proposal. Will a lot-line adjustment or plat be recorded to establish the property boundary for the new park as part of this permit application? 4. A geotechnical report for the site is required. Information on the water table and soil permeability with recommendations of appropriate flow control BMP options with typical designs for the site from the geotechnical engineer shall be submitted with the application. • 5. Surface Water System Development fees of $0.448 per square foot of new impervious surface will apply. This is payable prior to issuance of the construction permit. is\preapps\rha sunset terrace 2013.doc Sunset Lane—PRE 13-000306 Page 3 of 4 April 9,2013 • 6. Applicant will be required to submit separate structural plans for review and approval under a building permit for stormwater vault. Special inspection from the building department is required. 7. A Construction Stormwater Permit from Department of Ecology is required if clearing and grading of the site exceeds one acre. 8. Final design of the storm conveyance system will be determined prior to site plan submittal. Transportation/Street 1. Sunset Lane and NE 101h Street are classified as residential access streets. To meet the City's complete street standards, street improvements including a pavement width of 26 feet, curb, gutter, an 8-foot planter strip, 5-foot sidewalk, and storm drainage improvements are required to be constructed in the right of way fronting the site per City code 4-6-060. Street section will be a 52-foot right-of-way. 2. LED street lighting is required on all frontages to meet the lighting requirements specified in RMC 4- 4-0601. 3. Current traffic impact fees are $498.75 per unit for apartments or $435.75 per unit for owner occupied townhomes. Credit will be given for the existing home. These fees are payable prior to issuance of the building permit. General Comments 1. The multi-family project may qualify for a fee waiver. To qualify for waived fees, the project must • meet the following criteria: a. The multi-family housing project is new construction rental housing; and b. The project will be a minimum of eight (8) units if in the RM-F zone or R-14 zone within the Center Village Comprehensive Plan designation; or c. The project will be a minimum of thirty (30) units if in the CV zone within the Center Village Comprehensive Plan designation. Multi-family housing" means one or more new buildings designed for rental housing, each with four(4) or more dwelling units. Fees which may be partially waived include: a. Building permit and plan review fees b. Public Works plan review and inspection fees c. Water, surface water, and wastewater system development charges d. Fire, transportation, and parks impact fees Fifty percent (50%) of the above fees may be waived for eligible market-rate rental housing projects in accordance with Renton Municipal Code 4-1-210, Waived Fees. Request for rental housing incentive fee waivers must be made prior to or by the administrative site plan review period. These fee waivers are • effective for building permits issued after September 5, 2011, and will sunset at the close of business on December 31, 2015, unless extended by City Council action. is\preapps\rha sunset terrace 2013.doc Sunset Lane—PRE 13-000306 Page 4 of 4 April 9,2013 4. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Professional Engineer. 3. When the utility plans are complete, please submit three (3) copies of the drawings, two (2) copies of the drainage report, permit application, and an itemized cost of construction estimate, and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor. • • is\preapps\rha sunset terrace 2013.doc • • I •