Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA97-094 UPDATES
• FOR FILE :
cu .1 7 094
CRIFILMEc
\ /
Izt1?ToM.AvN � g�
?WIT KINAKANHIK-AErPN-+-',Er r-EraNIW LW-1- _P
/.FCbryµs.FANI-DrAPAE - =/�C>:fl¢Pa_Xt1,N-Y A INNNIK•.. 4'li'�h14Hf'-DfiL4PNNk LLC�!F-fuKP sL L.F. 'p w p
[EKED D.L.AT.j e,-,F_ 5_C.G.WYA4 : PERSTE,.
pGSTN+4I^LL • ...ire...?5141-IDSGPE MaRcl i
•
.I (�® �� A.A.
r Hv a RN JIW
•
�I" , ,-- �` r rTwR• - .:SWd'eaI•RA—.-- _ __ E� :4 -'-
unl:l I'
FrIl
•
��r onlTAY u,' fru^b 1-'b` l '}�` 4.,.4 4T�Tt1:I•mul--1Ylam 1` I••••"`n` � K...•w.' '. i ti 4� �r 11.... '
"44,21, -- vw--]v��y p' 1^ � '� ��n�YaacSr �'.2 _ ... -.1 *'�'MO1 © i�=�i( M .»,N �.T,a.n
7 ). AIZ IvdasE I' 0 � `'I'b ii~ b- PA. 9
L_ �, Tw v
it
•
•
I Il . l ...I. '� '�'rf SHIRK P j
" mICJI 1 .. L-i @ PLANTING DETAIL. ,A.�• S _ 1
7I. I da "PJ • _. r., I'tys . '. :a, ME �• A • �ii.72 ,,p p '''`
•�, ' �i ,••• - ,•� �;1 ' sx'macnu< v _ ICJ lei � ., _
•
•
•
•
.I. pm. TI '. , .._. : r 4,:hsE;i• a • •E• • • • a, /,1Drw
( _•4, . • I h f✓:r' QN�iG�-T' • "TIN Y f raaE RSEAst9 AND
I'�~'_' 0' .i�h� �: ;� INS •
• __ BROKEN NRAND. i
Io I '�" `r- NfarEw_ -�+tA11* N � r f'^,r_ ,P "T nw7u.'1e"vntuF sii DRwv`.e.i4 )
gRBcAVIITC itw' .F� ' : • — ' ,'7 "I- • �'`... c.TAP? • +�1: pr rmsmarm,TREE
awMEAD)""' . 1.r cpf=5s:exrr' \ ll
1EIi POR_0.2Y PGHIL.ENA 4 PA9J 4'Iba 704�3' - FD.f�EL P�OU,JD - . .. _ I I�r�.�\urzRnc Asp 1
P.caV,JD 6UIE_PH.14 G• - T0- I cuHPsTa�' AAA GRADE _ �I�/ 2 SETREO xn°�iulcu .W.R
,S'' • RED j q% s'Ecnm N.Ram evJanl _ I
I •
4 ,t><Iv)t" ...NN 1 ,XN aJ' wR w E LD YD x
WA
RDD DM WICT L�
CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING AND STAKING DETAIL '
"PTA"Is d•N)E[�vP -Ai?A-r I Y,5z5 sF - • SCALE,D Ic �((y�ry�
PLANI SCNNDI N E
POW,.NYR MAW... Ott .ig RM4i5 .. .. Z �.
ISLES - -- - s4'141 Z
= _ knENd ] BRo'N NNMf \ LANDSCAPE gq�p S,u�� 1NR5OTNE�S�'ryR� TREE • 3
��• ✓vaw�rueF .4•.-..'•..M NTsvu if tD I.I>"rl /JNM+Nvq 1.LC.B.NI ORPW TO STOAINi 0 U.NDSWC ING TiEYSELVES M"TH ALL OTHER 91EJVPROhLENis N10
•
I[ y:.,,'r",d: v,a,..Jw,n a1 s+aH N.aMad.., •
01 "'oA". II�� I
li�I >� l Pn...t.wsYmigai W,.abMP.e 3 b-TK NNMwdeq 2 6 iC0 0 PRµapV',.,..gE OWI�R'fRi o N(�i'°I�1TM RA S'�(t°LD a SFRNLE PNONC'N1-6irili�-5559)RAC,OR ` \,��� CP NxR fLA O i
��. L.ula.a T,MefW.a.gD.y.wp T N Mu.H .]..mx,iW.•TOR WALL YANTAN AND WATER Alt TAM WTEXAL FOR 1 YFIR OR MIL EBYL INSPECTION NO ACCEPTANCE ILI
40 ^� P n�ti. A..sl-YiO.,Pr.n 9 l.'-7•It Tull>.�t'IaG1.:G BY OWNER } V11�/ nG w/le�'wne°[ivs n D- uV
5 SA�(D(ANOCOJER E RESPONSIBLE FOR< NG SPECIFIC OWNTMES Or GROUND COVERS AND MANE WTEP145 ll.`14
. IQ?j r- a .,„ red.Ti.-.o-;.DG.....,7 A]Sy.). &l...I VIA8.X., SPECIA NE°D BELOW q MESE M.S.RUNTS AS STATED on n¢uwosunE PLw AND MINIMUM PLANTING°mAvcEs As +\ _ z
Wm,T' f..t'0 b 5 IM iJad AIVJAN S.GROUND COVERS SAIL BE PUNTED w AN WHEREEOULLATERAL TRIANGULAR SPACING PAIIEAN AT THE ON-CENTER ORTANC6 SHOWN
' - -0^Vae,Mn4 ONA NN' PakjJ 1. 5 DM EJNHii.y ON TES OR W ME PWl SCHEDULE WHERE GROUND COVER ADDS CURBING.SIDEWPII6.SINS OR PoUS. PRONE EASE AND Z .
• I-•r-I u.W'i.+. 'WJIG.vi nHac TTA Y-5.1, N.d Mf AN,[18..t.1.}"A,.., DISEtlaS SHu11 RE,2'ERW CENTER OP PUNT TO CURB.SIOEWNIS ETC.DI.Uti%AYI. BROWN a6
• ,.,��CsJ i.J- DIS ANLE SHALL BC 50 PLOY CGi1E0.OP 00.10 ANO SHRUBS `I I�
V q.o4e. s' NB, 2s41 H W ad Y2A5 "0.CONDUCTOR SALL BE RESPOUBIE FOR PROVIDING TIE MAXIMS DE PLAIN THAT ARE REPRESENTED UT SADO.ON
SP[CIFlm TREE 001STN OR
�E• >
!ie'fu.I•,P.Ik' NB, 9 1AJ TJadY Jry THE DRA'mNGi T.BOOf OR OCTAIl Asa£ '� Z a
HTx>+w,a+WAW'WIvR2 HP4 5 1oi NNMJd.Fl ),SUBGRAOE 6 TO BE WIT1w 1/IO,R µ,0 sE E�OOi AS PRPAJFD�'OTiEl6.011 PWIIING AREAS TO BE CLEWED WALL • -�MWRGWO'w WWI AREAS. REMOVE BINDNG WANE k MP
•
©®Y�mPMfllm' Dva Pp b bN PJNWd..I CO,6iRUCTON WTFIdI1 ANO ROCKS IARGtR,PAN 2 GAYDEM1 /O OF M.P. ZO•
Q..,.., 4-2,.2Pd . IJNIEADA _ . EN BED"'anal
AS$NPAN ON 114 TINS. fr RE r 6 N Y°F io .]-wnY T O'i N•_ q M I.2-5000
©e O,*K ADDO.E4.1W!u' am,YdOwGr 5M rjNMwd,T 0 1HEN ROTOIN£1S TO A DEPTI OE B.THEN NI IOOITONAL A M UM O P E w ALL NEW BED LAGS 2"SETTLED DEPTH AA SPECIFIED YULW /
9.♦IL l3Ds TO RELINE A IYftlYUU OG 2'NNE EYt MRJC GRAD -S)
OUu,L,.Nwm...04.W AM B 21-2M'H Id W AYid.R 1 1,W ,FAG. BE FOTNR IDLED IMM AGRO TMNSPLAVr RERTERER♦-2-2 PER WATER.ROM + A-E1 G t TABLETS ''=
FnuWaa.u.'GLLIu{<m' p.m IM NNAVday U YPNUROGNREIiS RmSOIYyvM� �� _
AJu.ul'' !.cLLo D:1 IN N•dM,Idm • FNOAT Ll�
v Owe k.L,p.'Rurb!,a,d A.. ) 9"-2MN F8ealAl.q 1•µLLPLANT MATERIAL REPLACEMENTS WOE A ONCE.T" .co fORII TO AN1 STANDARDS FON NURSCRR STOCK.UIEST EDMON.ANY • •
OyJs4 L."
Iu wyk<WA!»mw • R.AM A. PMi9D'csb _ �F61fIE0 PUNTING 5O4�" �' � 9v .
touA GENERAU ALL PUNT WIEAOLS NWl4xm SHALL¢HEALINY REPREBGIuiNES,TYPICAL G'THEIR SPECKS �. PUNRNG TT
„�, Pwn p,M,:D"`P '� i OF VAMP.'AND SHALL wvE A NORMAL HABIT a CROWD..ME,SHALL BE Puu.wEu-RwNG®WELL- `�', ^• •Ii SIDES A.Iartou
• RNnit PROPORTIONED. VFaROUs,WI'IL-DEVELOPED ROOT SYSTEM.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE HAkDI UNDISTURBED GNUnT e- - '
.uv's.r Y ��' ,44 ".I UNDER CLIMATIC AND
0NBM TO THOSE w THE LOCAL DV OF THE PROJECT. `� tii'::a;at: SOLL v04vp wTNE
STAKE'DT-PCR 0 , '�^Iss •
, R"MOM SHRUB,
THE PLAIAIMN ULAN RANTS
OmM BE HEALTHY.VIGOROUS.WL-1.1.-FOLNTED WHECNN IN LAAE MEE or Yr:!lorS,I�... ,i�
V` "��.T.uai H+efW IVd RrtaM'omvm ! DISEASE.MNWIR' DECAY.HARMFUL BE
DEFECTS.AND
OR O'A'iio suBSTMION[KIWI - IN W SSOK.S.OR AAGW S-.6.Rl
U 6.n. TB INRN • PdNMefq IL
�C.+._-vu JL".nin'P.mo-bn' LxR.gl'nev, R l8 2ol Pot 21"o.u✓ • Il CONTRACTOR 14000 i0 PRWIDE A ONE-TEAR WARRANTY ON Ill 111 0 MATERIAL. NTO,a D NOCK.GRAY 000D -
NNYIAN IS MPIOMATC IRMOADSI SYSSIJ SHALL BE BICKER DES.NIM AN AS-BUTT PROroED TO OWNER/IWRtJR PIANIItL
• ...A._.i... -9..Ani� 1 IJ .. ,M..
Sow.p1.eb...f:,ar......-14 betrvu.Ud,yh WR 51.A. M' .. --. _. _. ._-_._ ._ _ '
-- - -• - — TREE PLANTING & STAKING DETAIL ' •
. : .: ..
W
, . ... . t
• . . .
. -
a. . .
.?.. `" '
, ,,,STATEcCfroN .z tu 1,1 t.„9. 4
i •
. . , .
. , LAMOSt.A.PC NitaalcCi, g„.,Ex ,
. , • . -4,,Z PI./e4.1..)_ n 2-
' .
CS...7!....... '.Z.,
_
NZellr.fL11,11 Ave 1-w- . . .
; ,
: a _
. ., - •
•,-,
, . • :
. ,
. .
4 iirvittr!_-,....-repuoin i.p•if:Fuic.e. . I. .. ,„
• • ' . .....
.-
., .
. • •
11°11111111111111101 II .
.: .
. • .
7,77-7."1„ IN
-
_ •t— Pr.wr.4,-rr Lam
_ ,,: _.......... __. _ L---ri.„,e1Arilti.i.4....- • AO.I,.aaut aos 1
.
1-gr-141",eti Perv- --.--,..---7 =--:-.-- _ _-•__. ' .• • ••
• • '• 1,rry.a,i.t..1-t.,..:7- 7,,,eggallint,gii,•., ,-.,,:.:'- ,.,...."I'i.;1;."..;..rpgr,.., F4.1"‘'f-r-w-- . :::;,-.--1,77
• , .• re-n.44,6.14 r-r4-ica,......04.-roP oF re.rIc.r...
. .
• .
. '-'•, ,601=10E- , . ... ,Viclo....r,!.erit.in..-,:roti.ic. 7:'::: IINI. li
• ,
m ,.. tii .'2.Z'-....•
.,•crr t,..,.,
•
I
t • _ e,.._ ..-- ' '-'2!: KRIM• '.0..TE:14.1.,14 em`...le....,1-0..;UND VbAPOYsi
leo.,..... 1111Zi., 7:.. Ind..., 17::Ei...-"i-ija.1=.1-..:-. 1',4(..'y- .„ ' , . ; .
- _ „..._...........,..aunt.sat • .
".,. z"' • ,i,• .... r74,E),,•.1 .-WK.ICI t7-7Z•se: P • '"
1 t...-----.......=.0.........,,.._,,,,.IMI II..:,
. 4-1m02
.....
, --
IFIN9 51"Ait WOOP FeNic_ 1 i .: rag:F.E.,1c,g ly1/1!:1YL,,,.A.0,1Th.C. ..1-1.01 t-INK.Fr-Se-g.WIT ii G4.7 t. '• , -
HT vimn.-ex4s4D,--4-0,13 utiY-F, -''.. ? .. .....—... ,.../ riar 11,SCAM
. , . ...... ... .. 1 ......
.I -7,, .. ...', '--.-. ::;?540,t4'.1-7:'-'1L* 1'-..i '- i . . -• . !
F-Ii..T1..14 1.1-6T,4119 L.==a '
‘,....f ' : •
" I •
. - • .
• •
, • •
" 1,‘..4'1 .•-•I , ,, , ,;
. : r-_-=•-.-. •
. r71-176-,. ' . ' :'; :di ' l• :',6;t1:17Z.,'A.:, :' ':-.. : 1: . - . .. . . ,
. , .
- . ..
•. .
. " . .
... • ; ''L-4,,L.
•.. .
_ . . _ • . : . ...
. . ,_ _ •
, .
Or,
,..
• ' '! U ' 1 '
-
IIIIIIIINIINI
. .
. . 0
• C-) < .. '
. • ,
...,
. ,. , : : < < ,--°,5 ,-•
, .. ---....I
• . . ,
•
' .
. .
: • .
. . .
. • I 6
• - •
. ; . . • ,
N. • -. oa..__ . ; • ,
,..".••,- ..**--\ --\ In-.? 1,-1:P'-, .
. . . .• , , n
, .
• .-.-.2 L,'51-7 • ...• TV:7ce .o •( ,V',fl-',YU-hr6 " : .
- , Y:
° 11-1 2
,
-'1*-,:-..; , .
r'''''''''''''''• ' - '.1,___vr• I-- ._: ' -"- lie.....0..,c4 - LI 11-_,. • :'.
_._„. . . . . 0 41.L. z • 2
• , • . n ,„0 ,,.3 ;
. .
. .
..• , :0 u, L.
1 FL.AY1:-.:LIRP•im.. .1.16s-rr-P--1Ast_ P-e_TA.11.- • , . ;= In v •
, . . .. , . •
• - 11,T..se.P.,..e. , • . •
• . . 5. ,
: . • : .
. ' .
• .
• ' ,
. .
•.
...'. 5 .
'
20F1
, .
- - - -- • •
• A....i
,
p. CIT�c )F RENTON .
Plannin uildin blicWorks Department
athy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
October 26, 2005
•
Susan Camerer •
YisionHouse
501 Union Ave NE
1enton, WA 98056
•
Subject: Approval of Modification of Site Plan for Vision House,501 Union Avenue NE;
Renton,City Land Use File No:LUA97-094
•
Dear Ms. Camerer:
•
We have reviewed your proposed revisions to the Vision Rouse site plan for the group home ,
• ocated at 501/507 Union Avenue NE The Vision:House site Plan;was approved by the City on
September 22, 1997. The approved'site plan was granted,for a 5,000 square foot,two-unit
structure; a 9,200 square foot,two-unit structure,.`and associated open.space and parking facilities. -
r• ,
you propose to add`>a two-story,2,070 square foot addition onto the.existing building on the south
• you
The addition would add 830square feet to the foo print of the buildin The structure
q. �. . g
Would contain areas for play, study and.counseling: Additional living would not be added and.
the capacity for housing residents on the site would not be increased:
• The Site Plan regulations define a minor adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as
hhanges which do not involve more than a 10%increase in area or scale of the development, do not
ave a significantly greater impact on the environment and facilities, and do not change the
boundaries of the originally approved plan(RMC 4-9-200.H). The addition would not constitute "
more than a 10%.increase in the scale of the development,.and would not have a significantly
greater impact on the environment. There will be,no increase in the.number of people served by the •
complex. The proposal would not change the boundaries"of the project. The structure would
Comply with the City's setback,height and lot coverage requirements. The lot coverage for the site
after the modification would be 24%.
�The proposed changes, as depicted on the site plan and landscape plan received-by the City on
• lOctober. 17,2005;.are hereby approved as a minor modification to the previously,approved '
site plan,provided all applicable codes are complied with.
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 P.. ENT'O N
CoHEAD OF THE CURVE
: This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer
This decision to approve the proposed revisions as a minor modification is subject tti a fourteen(14)
day appeal'period from the date of this letter.. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be •
1 led.with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 p.m.,November 9, 2005. Appeals to the
Examiner are governed by.the City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional
information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,
425) 43.0-6510. Appeals must be filed in writing together"with the required'$75:00 application fee,
to: Hearing Examiner;"City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton, WA 98055: Any-
construction undertaken before the expiration of the appeal period will he at the applicant's risk. If
}.Fou.have questions regarding this correspondence,feel free to contact Valerie Kinast at(425)430= -
7289. ..
Sincerely, ,
iicc4
ennifer.Henning.
Principal Planner - , ;
{
CO: . :Merwyn Haneberg
Damn Walton,All CAD ` - r; . . .
Mary Cahill, Smart`Spaces`jy� `' - :t` .
.,.w / y�� >- - v - a,� 'loci v-<r, .--- --------_
z.
a `lam i_\w ,
I irt
v Vision
�"i i' �( ii�'
Phase II Building Phase II Building �� \ i-10USS
_.<,_ __ i• �=4 -°rl 1 �LBn • ChiIdren's
CrateyOVER "� _ -4‘..., ( + Center
r. out_ 1 }1 itiL r � '- - ' - - 01 Union Avenue NE.
1 PIIII1101i a -__ -me . \
; 3.
; I-' ,F'has€lrParklag RENTON,WA 93056
in
*1_.
o. r't ,ql�� 1 -, �+ 1111111111m�•
r�BMpD PL.A4TBVC.RJ SLOPES - [ �Gi � � � ��• `y, � I ������\
IZ ,e> .�l,Y-!q \ ./\E..,��1i'1t\, 1 - -"_� '1- (>Y- - _- _ - -�. �\ .: �-° )1 ' \1. \\�`>vo�vav�vu�v�yy\
5.1SRA14-1
Cf-
PLAY u_ W011dt �.-/ ./� s.�i- -l'_ y -ly ._ - S , --- �� .
Dlemord P I Ed In to eontein wood 1-:// - • �� 1 r'' __,Poly Edging le chips P• I Work n- '.7l `l-':r.,-r: \ * _ I �'�'"' '�-4- '�- •� - �; • ,''i
......j
existing play m adjacent
Ensure ate, ,�� I \e _ -
} _ _ j`}/�Y ,i I mot, ! � ,F .-`:I..,.,:.• �`�—= �? ,\• �' i
Relocate 1'r
f.,'.;L t-
dequate d play
from a rOvid t eon etc. �`_ _ \ ` �� _ l yri cl fence,end play house le provided for cote � I - •, f " \��� ,�\• _� �`�.:.;
•
play. _ - 1� V`d °.,(/) ----..-2—.,-.. .-. . ._, :-..... ..7 -- .i 1 I .a.ppleLe..lr�
P 9 Pe
red of din to be I 1 EW LONG
Sub ads le area to ellow 5 Min y P,e, I_-__ ,__ i _;_. Id nyy�.++IiSCd�,7e
depth woodlay chips.adjacent
"Min 1' - _____-__� `,� ;�1, .. ':_:�' arCr7ltetaUre
febrne onnier bepLweerl subsoil and la ' j'm i �.•p'_ \ � _.- eve
din e.PI i^g ` / c_ ,•.- - t` : 1
fl pp with n I ado of e t la SZa• I _ I5¢o5 9E mist
uB}I a eh WALK \\ '/ Oil' i Renton,DU 96.8
•
•
Revise grades west id of building ;' `") I�� EXisting , \ '� gr - / (425>155-5136
as Indleated 9cenM1j all planting areas '.�' yI 4 I y 1 ' - /' (4lv Mewand,o
lc a minimum depth 0,12 Inches. 395 Phase I Building _ - Phase ( Parking - .i
Incorporate 7°or Ceder Grove Compost i I IJ ''• u • lI • ''` '.'):; /
into scanned planting a prior to tv 396 u96 To Remain
installation of plant materials. tell Y" ryj L `/ `1I \ a✓fraLL %%
Medlun Fine Berk Mulch over all planting � �� Nee -�t r -- , _T'\r'�! \ _ fi•. \ t1 6 arose after pleming le complete i IBUi lding --�I -•i_ e j-- - �' /+ `, �`, _ �--� / ',,0
'aim SP 1,
install plantings In locations shown ,Y�• J>y��, 391 • I ``1_ •' JI \ '
planting details. Stake trees ee lig�`(/%� JJ 1:. "ttlp���.�j� I \ .•.- Le /
Indicated.Refer to plant legend for �/� / 1 +-i r { 1.OWN(
i, \
v oI e lee end sizes - J
spec'.
�'r\� ,� r I "`�; \ - / Yy. =f e,<,eo.wBp.,.w
Bark Mulch pethue - Il \ i— - __ - - `,% 11r\ i7 ��
T _ _-�% PROJECT NUMBERII20.00
II i;�i„y j 'i i Cs\au�,L\ '\ Y` ����`�� YL_____J/
\� i ..':I DATE: 10-13-7005
n
I \ •� _ — . ___ _-`` ` ` DRALLN.GE CHECKED.ME
__,..---1,-- i� //\ '�� ( \\ - �� E. �a Pans,I a -�-�� -` '-� _ - REv 5IQJ5
�--'---/--
I- Jr \��i - Symbol gvan'tlty__ Scientlilc Npnt-� LSnwpp Nane -�__Plantin8 Sixe -
/ \</____S i/1-�.8 P�usyedoenels'AccolSNn6 accolade rlo Cherry 3'-CUI--�_ �
Ile E/Iting adea Int-':'_th detion -_/ - ('( 2 Cornus kousn'Sotomr Saeonlflo.ering .3'Cal _- ___ ^o
waling new building „iv:. 66 6otystichun nunitvn Western Sword fern 2-Gd1-
_— i � alil
` 4 Canellla Japonica lion Knudsen- Tan Knudsen Camellia 5-Gal
Op ® 36 Rhododendron'Blue Dlonond' Blue Diamond Rhododendron 5-Gal �m�®
Q ll Rhododendron'J.M.deMantegue' Jean Marie Rhododendron 5-Gen
Relocate existing Chain Lids Gate,fence poets end fabric.Tie in to • 12 Rhododendron'Unique' Unique Rhododendron 5-Gal s
11
existing building on abet side of office window_ a 0 20 Rhododendron'occidentale' Western Azalea 2-Gal •
. Construction
ikit �� 4 hiatus'KIeM's Improved Bechtel' KIeM's Bechtel Crabapple 2'-Cal
0 Il Tagus sYlvoti[o'➢owyck' Dawy[k Beech 1'-Cal —
O 5 Magnolia vlr6lniana Sweet Bay Magnolia 2•-Calill Doements
--WAIL..
._
. Sr Gaultherla s a on Salal 1-Gal 24.GC Tri
2 A[er[Ircinatun Vine Maple 8'HL.
Pro feet-Narrative of Landscape Work 8 Popvlus trenWoldes'Kalbala' Kebab Gucking Aspen 1'-Cal em ,.,. II� °
I. Remove,store and/or replace 5 Trees,14 S4'rube and groundcover q S[e.artia nonadelpna Tall rte.artia 3•-cal w.....
to facilitate construction or Children's Center. All plant material that .) © 1 nagnmm grondiflora Southern Magnoliaz•cal. 13 nem maxi,.-`eRricaL onto
is not saved and re-used shall be Identical species of equal or Symbol aa ontity Scientific Name cannon Name Planting Sitelarger size at time of planting. 5L s moo.heterophyua Western neriaSk 6-B•Ht
Y.Area of groundcover to be removed Is 4-15 SF. Area to be
replaced is 550 SF Broadleaf Deciduous Plantinci
3.Relocate existing play structure and provide wood play chip Symbol ovantity Scientific Name Common None Pmnting Sire
surface beneath 0 2 Ayer palnatan Japanese maple 11/2•-Can a Plan
4.Revise existing Irrigation system to provide 100 9 uniform coverage B
to all new planting areas. Note: Full stele plant eymbole to left of tine legend symbolize the epeclee to be replanted ea io
30
part or tale project Gaantltle•shown In title legend Include the entire eta taantitiee few D lw zw
purpose or replacement are as Indicated by plant symbols within the Ilmit of sort line for title Scale 1' = 10'
project. ' L I /�
—2.0
Apia v /140Nh"e ms __ - .
' Architectural
Drafting 4 Design By,
4-
- � -I
Lyme by Dsign LLC
20b371�9T1`
Ik NARRATIVE OF WORK: , E - ••
LEARE AA<1NG FOR A 91-E P...4V h10D1='CAT ON OF TIE Shutt�aJSpiffs
PROF-1c1.0 r LOCATED AT 501 UNION AVENUE N.E.'N REN ON by lesln
•
, LAA-IINGTON.
6
_ _- _ __ \= ___ _- ___ __� THIS PROJEC-IS'O P¢OVDE A MULTI LSE AREA 1\1 ADDITION FOR THE VISON kOJSE RESIDENTS AS SHOWN IN
f,---_ s-�___ - .' THESE P._ANS.
/ I I THE AREA WILL It.tTJ FOR,g`Lm"AREA,GAME AREA,
i I CRAFTS,1 COUNSELING.
r // i T
r ' �. '�� r / I - g I LE PROPOSE 4'TATCFPNG TO THE EXISTING BUILDING AN
( ill ' > Y ` ADDITION OF XJ35 SLE1.4RE FEET.
�• _ 1 ' LA WILL BE MOVING'TREE AHD A-tteUX'HA-LY A VARIOUS
/� /,—,/
�/ ? / \ \�f� v F,I ISHFS.FOR A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF T'II5 S• TIE
_-.-"/
\\�J/ ,.w„c. �•J ' " - , I �.4NDFCA PLAN.
/r ,.
\� z A ' THE A..�vtU LOT COVERAGE EOUALS 1030 SCIJARE I-Etl OF •
ti — ' tw- If ¢05.
—__ __ [� --�� _ ..,. __-_ y<. __`\, ___ y� THE STORK LATER DRAINAGE IS DIREC-ED TO TI-E EXISTING
iJ/ ��\, << - i ��\�� y I\ I DOWN SPOUTS SO-•IA-THE EXIST NG DRAINAGE PLAN LULL
i.. ,I% �; \ g NO-BE ALTERED AND WU.BEA,L.L'••UTILIZED.
DAY .�. i E '
CARE ,�-, r /• / / n1\a I h — _.-
:.l.Q,.� -- �� M I' , 'It-; m VISION HOUSE
I
` t/ }� / /li ADDITION
7
MY
---N."....j1L"....
ue jr I t - — � a. -
s
/. Tr Plen I _ -
lJ f°.2p•.p•
I Fr,AI DESCRIPTION•
I \
I E171.. .. SITE PLAN
5I7°LA\—__O -00 o 0 _ 0 0
1 I I 447 aaMro
e.wou.....law
Alf
I 0r0nm 230 n,
•
1 1 O ; E \ 1
17 11 o h
I� i . 1
nba I I
h�A I lb
O . 1 mX
2 , il
I nil
hh
0 . i•NIN------. 1
1 I
I, ki kk tin
to
1 e
T h
I AFr ON
I a C p o II
1
p n
°e o�
1
` g 1
8 S.4Z1u \ 4
II
C O
. `iq' ;r I
1` ` '
�� .W � i
>,fie'. IIQ
1 r y I•• Q
1 ,44
I '
.0.f''S).4Z'I ' — -- BS] fir 4t10,.11I" .� -Et::t •
� © SIttlN�} �z, : UNION _AVENUE_ N.E. — _ __
a. 3 ABERDEEN AY'
X . '• '. 14C A a<4t
n Yip► �� _. _ .-.... .... _ - ---
®°ll
• -� r� ,�.� eat ..� P��^
t ZI1 j�.ff. 1„W
;8a 3 01 ,,.a
Fb Ghent. 1 Bruce S.MacVei;h,P.E. - Civil Engineer Project Drawn. ssn
\1 U/J/ON SP9-f-/ NEEDS NOUJ%NG T,PEE /N!/ENTD,PY!lnnrEvrvAc cnock,�d:
P.`D. BOX 79S/ 14245 59th Ave.S. WS/ON SPE/'/AL NEEDS NODS/NG G-UNi7
0, PENTON� WA 9aOSG-295/ //OUS//VG PPGSELT Scale./'=20
� Tukwila,WA 981G8
Po/NT ar!'ONTAC T: SXX UN/ON AUE., QEN70N, WA pate:/sJ�/L 77
tlit S VISA N 4.9//EEE,e Tel:(206)242-7665 Fax: Salle-call first. SE 9-7-23 N-,PS'E, W.H.
CZL7GJ Z2e-6 3'5-6 Job No. 772./
tn ; ij �r3ryr' iiu .
z, Fn
i
R
. - ,..„..,,,inetetip.,,,,,,•:..f.•:.???,f,,,40: ::.:-..,.•,,...•,„:••••••,••••,,,„.f.„„;... „ igh,,,:, ,iii•T,pt..,f.z,,1.,,A,,,....,,.'- ;,:,(';'',"',.;;! , i..4.,, -L-',z.';Cf":''.;,,''.,,,.;-',.":,,r''t
e,, r
r"?irr",4r,;1.1_::,;44,..K.'ik-rk':.?? i,-.:',AW•1:,.;•,,,,,,- •. - • ,,,• -,#,N-,,,•.•,,,...•,•......-,,,,4 , :: •,...„,,,,...:;.,,,,,„..-,---_,„,:t,-,,,,, .:..,... .,,:. . . ' • ,t,,A . .'. , • 4 t••' --, 4- ':', . , ••
',- -:..ps„-,•.•-,.,„',;-.-' • " , ' ---",,.-•-••. -'-'-'!''?"'-',',':::::-.''' '',-. ' , • -• ''-- ' ''' '' • ' • 1:--'-'''''. '''''''''''-' . ';'''.". ,': '''."1°'',...','...''''''',.. '' ''''''4. ' 1:::::' 1'. '-'...
,„,,,,,,,_,....„.„. . .uiiiOt: . N . ,
. , ,
t" , ,
' , .
. ., ..,. .
„.... ..,
• , s
_,
...
t,„ a� t •
k ,
F i'
•
1 III s .
S 1 spa - +F4 `<:- - 1
4
' r p
, 3 c 7'
yy� it a # g . t i
s€ 3' ; ! 'fir fay i .y , 4.--I-•;.,,,,,,, ,,-:::,,..„-,.,,,,, ,, •":„: ,,,,,,-,4.,-.--1-1.:.,-.-'„ - .. ...,-,v:,, ..„...,,. ...,.„. -;.;:if--1-11'.' 1:7;.-t;• i.,. .,r-:'','.• ir'.
+!'
4
•
k4, 3 a y y ti
�' 3 nt ' 4r+'.`a..a `� y 4 yY r �;: ,o,,, § Pt.,
J 'e • 1,3.i.
�^ ('V t�` r+,gd • 5 �:.? $Pj ' k r' r a 4
t <n' 'S :t'. `K�y t tr s� ' . .r rz' 4, v y
6 ' a/ p :r` a,• �a >i p } a1 .
.',,-,i.1;:..t.'.,'.':,-
.z. t`-' °3.•�k x .. Z . +; i; t �.. k
� q
Tip f ! y 3 b :� �Fik§' F' �y • s x �.F 4
s r v 'i"srx'Y'd h it fi .i 1 • ••t �, y:
Pr4,
.„,,,,,,_,,,„,•,,:„,,,.„,„,, A.,...-....,•.-ii
•
4.. '33�+tWx kxrt ? p7 a r t Y t .J
F
c .
;C$ fi >r�, +s 4 ),.
S
K ti""
'r'FS3 i
i;r,x
,.., .., \\ "..... .., .....,_
%1,•,,i .„ ,,
I t . ,,,
,:'.1::.:
.. Yy • q t f s!S�9
•.H I I I ....„...u •
;fyZ„4 4. N,.
am 1
rrr fi' r
�"k.ta P p t
�Ai. w ' �' t e
'
y :EiS ,' N 'zT' .,T"w tay i p y
? <a - i i., 4A s >'y
.. no • „..., ,,_ . .,.,,,i.
M' 1
,..„ —,„„..,..„,,,J,„,.,.-:n.; fi ...,,. "....• ...;:.-,j,::-.. '
3 l. ' 1
'
•
...: tipk FA 7
.
•
,. ..r. p ,� - >
„ ry
1111 4
.. a H, L '
, _ ' t1110.11.' - s
9 55
;
J
.0 €
4� . '� i d R Q
p s I ...
5
`: a wr .? r'"N'4r t .
t Y t e;h 44
)I'zr - x t 1d
t � h3. •
;
y
• •
5590 REGSTERED
Y WALLACE
N.E. 5TH STREET TE Of WASHINGTON
- - - 1207 NORTH 33RD STREET
I
REN10N,WA 98056
A (206)254-1862
Y
/ I Y
J0CD
F • QZEC
OW C'D
I M CO
=06
N
Z co N
I O 0 ro-
111 ` -W cv
-- -- -- — — - - - - S. 5Zv
210.86 b PROPERTY LINE
I I— o �I,
i��7..rs._ol>�.I II L f •4.1 I
i v•NEN■ �:�. II cow oN Lam io. sa..p --1 SETBACK
a I. 9tw- _ o 0
li couuoN.��II ��NR.A►�S\\ I .1
��YY4". \
COw10N II \
/ DINING arkiI I L_, COMMON` womb"6
II II�nII DINING `\ii/ ^I LEGEND:
`ND" , L
�Q - WRY I TOTAL SITE: 34,680 SF
�. %r11=1 , `�•, �� \ PHASE 1
--._-/ =i`vi I FIRST FLOOR: 2,825 SF
��I)pl \I== V ill I w SECOND FLOOR: 2,175 SF $
C60EEM- All t TOTAL: 5,000 SF
1 IIIIF7�1151 SEY •
L J MOAN I *I z PHASE 2
p� L J �1 FIRST FLOOR: 4,600 SF
�sE eacK — J a L�I I SECOND FLOOR: 4,600 SF
TOTAL: 9,200 SF
f'...�._.PROPERTY LINE - 1 w TOTAL FOOT PRINT: 7,425 SF
-- -- - -- -- -- -- --RAY GROUND �•
• > PERCENT COVERAGE: 21%
I PARKING REQUIRED W
— — 1 � STANDARD: 7 Z
r • Z COMPACT: 5 O 0
20._A _ 1 I f 0 ACCESSIBLE: 1 I O
a l PARKING PROVIDED 0 O Z
II IIQQ'I s0Y- I I I I STANDARD: 7 Z W CC_
1 COMMON.la GAYYON I. L. I �I ACCESSIBLE: 1 < CO W
- a `t PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE: NONE a O=Q
I .I ^ ' -.1�• 0 ALL OTHER LANDSCAPE: 22,000 SF F d 0
d�� �l aNWc ® �ullll� �I add�� � I ALLOW BUILDING HEIGHT: 2 STORY-30' CC M
la j L�o +� r ���.y; ,, I PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT: 2 STORY-25' d LJJ 0
L-1 mom s- 11111EA r_, r\.,s! l�i' 101 i ALLOW BUILDING SETBACK J I-
I 1 'Y `\\II FRONT: 20' C'3 Z
/ SET cKl \y I SIDE: 10' Z CC
�sEIBACK J_ — I REAR: 20' CO
L t - i1U;,' '��\ . PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK
ek'>-
PROPERTY UNE - 213.14
FRONT: 48'
-- -- - -- -- — - SIDE: 10'
25-- - REAR: 48'
a I
20'-0•• 30•-0• INDEX:
SHEET NO. DESCRIPTIONS1 SITE PLAN *
SITE P LAN (2) I L1 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN •$
El• GENERALIZED ELEVATIONS DATES 174•-0'
SCALE: 1"=20' O" P1 CONCEPTUALFLOOR PERSPECTIVE VIEW �^RAwN o7-ta-
Ft PLANS ( HASE I CHECKED HIS
-- - F2 FLOOR PLANS (PPHASE II3 SHEET
I D1 DRAINAGE PLAN 1
Ti TREE INVENTORY PLAN S 1 0'
• 4 4
Pork 'I''__
, ,..
LR'''
.. c•-•%•••• ,:,, ;,,,... .- -f....: I I!: ------(2)-----
.. ilfggalalitORIN.1'.5 '-ff-lin
•''' "
oVII • !I act-iv,mnitin! . .,,,Mm:
`044,11 ii 1 ,"
iro:T H „re.:' CHAR
...„-,
ll,4
si.
it.. . IF LI•1,14 '' :•014Yelt .' ':VP'
11171 WV_.; ..,,:. 0' .',':mit 46„,,,. I crell 670, ,;i',44,S, '''''''-...,
H-Itat. Own V.:::""" '"" ...,,;,...,‘
'm 1.4 q1;,- ,. °
: • Deti .,IIII:2F,a doCV-4;,,,,,,v'ct-P4 6 13' '. I
.-.•,, ..,r, ,,,iel,•.,..,•tr-w.,„..:•Q .. .•
..,,,.. •• ,.1 ma gichivici w rasiEst,. z- 0 I-1:10,•In 0..•
:. r-
3''l rAgliCliC31 'nu , .
tilt jfiru, mgrgigni.4 .6
;i5fori Y.sALn.EuElIvalw.. GI v'ET D. "'416-45111k -1
...„.....-
..., ...
H
,
" - 1 • •''' . "
12 I ii ';; p. •
a Fa t eac 0
1 -1,14..U1 E.,..En?•. 1E1 ; ' N !..
II E;3
!I
. I 7. 40.7 rt,,i, writ,: 18ft&lH
il, ; r •— . , matzo .,, , , ,
A„
EL EL.. A RN,.
I ',. ' . I
ELtE rl!-, .-,,,..!:
La . a-- h LI, li•
1: 1
'g I
I ,II' 1.VE:3',11,' .,,Ela'4,t, 'I Er, ..1 p,.!r; r t. 0,..:,
- _ 82.�2' 0 __ --
7—
o
-
0 14
I
17 i � g11 I 1._.!,) i .
WI
I I am w ! I I I' i' a A
I _19© L_ I , ' 1
- . I
\ . 1, j 2
?",%.' ) \ \ ' 11
ly —. �bill I m
C1- 1 V\ _ i/ A �A I
-- .-- sroiart
r L. __—_ . S'•P4L s7"y� tiv. .ate , /10 ' V ®;
1 N III < �� Gd •10..0E
I ' r--- 4 i--_-*W I1 ts o 41 �Mtl ./- I k I ..... _Li\,e, i 1 , ..\,,,,o. ' 4,4 b ‘
N` �.czi1��" .,.(.ry' I `� 8"PYC ST D 9 .
vg v ma's• ti ••j: ...., .t / ,, __ �I:� *I� L•►�.
a @L{2'
P N ( �j w
�Z - : \} .* ^ N4`'ti' i
^a `. r �»> y+ yt l�T • ( �EX.STD_ -+r lEA M
r;is, „4 - �����'`� =a -" � UNION _AVENUE 11 N.E. - _ __ .
�E) - ; Y b till x
....• b k v •
%(..,. • ' 1 N'''. -_:_....,..-Imii i • • r 4 ..
.11
a.
..sue. � a
ii
X_ '- .4 K. `
tD^ 1
I DO '_ _ ". si,
if
t:l i Ili,-• ....-.) • ii 0 trig ...111 oily,
. t 0?':'• ! ,,,,L, . A '.. - .:.......;iip
38;at ;:,,,. La.. , ... Av' .- — .
": [. . t " . *• '•'r. .i.
I• 1
•
Client- m 1roject UT/L/TY AND Drx�n Qsn
•
Rl Bruce S.MacVciah,P.E. - Civil Engineer
'II//S/ON SPEC•/AL .YEEo- NOUS�N6 •
D.P.9//PAGE /'LA/V t^[HNCFPTUIDL] Checked,To.Be, 29S/ 14215 59th S. V/S/ON SPEC NEEDS IAL NO//S/N6 6-UN/7
NI REN73oN. WA 9BdSGZ9S/ Ave. Stale./'•=ZO'
Tukwila,WA 98168 NONS/N6 P.POTECT
Sxx VN/ON AVE..RENTON. WA Date./T:INL 97
It SvS4./• of Lre.e.e L•T: Tel:(206)242-7665 Far: Same-call first. sE 9-TZ3N-ES-E. W.M. •
SVS.ON C.3-4_73E Job No. 9721
(ZO4) Z28-6356
•
9990 RECC STEREOT
i
Y WALLACE
Sf TE OF WASHINGTON
r
'- 1207 NORTH 33R09 STREET
r J R(205) 54 9862
�� �� - ^' (206)Z54-1862 Y
'i BED BED SEMI-
SEMI- COMMON
BED I
COMMON 1 COMMON �IT �7 ..i
�
_,CD CD
¢Z EA
BATH I 2 N
0 ' So°0 r BED Z c0 N
L 0 CI En
BED DINING DINING KITCHEN �� �_ i 4 _ W N
W d
J I � f - r Z.r
1
i
9 9
SECOND FLOOR PLAN ,f ,
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" v
1 1 I \ \ 1 I
,
t- -- . ==-T {
F--11 1 1 1 1I
IL_-1 1 r I
T , ter_,
1 W Z
w
1 - — ,../-- __._..... BED BED I SEMI- ¢ w O O
II 1 SEMI- COMMON o 1 CO o co Z
COMMON BED COMMON '` ' I ° w w x
z O1¢
_� :S. �— r- - p O
cc m
o
41
�(�,, �l ¢ BED O —W'O
BED DINING r8S0i- L I �m z
LL Zw
BATH' KIT r� -F- i 1 l co cr
/L1 1 1L_-; 4 r
r
L-___1 - . "--' 1 I I I I 1 I I 0 -J
%
)-1 1
1 T ENTRY -
WAIT
OFFICE OFFICE \ - _ SCALE /9-1
'-0 $
\ J DATE 07-14-97
DRAWN BY JOW r
.� 1 ".,_� CHECKED B10
SHEET
L J f—F+RST—FLOOR PLAN r' ( F1 G8�\ ��� SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" `• _
•
9
5500 RA SfERED
C
Y WALLACE
TE OF WASHINOTON
4
1207 NORTH 33RD STREET
RENTON,WA 98056
(206)254-1862 V
J co
Q Z to
M
CD
1
CO2cV
Z co
ci
Fa W N
>Z
IU it
_ I /
in in ED IMI , .,0
i I
i
48.-0" 37' 0" 1 58'-3" 1
1 - - � W
Z
EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS n o 00
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" E1 T- _
Z
w W es=
0 d1-Q
w
z �wO
w C7 Z
CD Z
C
$ $
SCALE 1/B'=1'-O'
DATE 07-14-97
DRAWN BY JSW
CHECKED BTS
SHEET
El °8
5590 REG STE ED
C
Y .WALLACE
ST TE OF WASHINGTON
F / / 01l116= I D II M' L 1207 NORTH}}R0 STREET
REMON,WA 98056
> I M II[]0 BED SEMI— -- I �i�—ag (zoal 254-1e62
KITCHEN COMMON Ci IIaI cc
NI^V ■ SEMI- BED �I flj
COMMON KITCHENS
N _ _.C3cc
¢zLr�
COMMON •` 04> v M
�� BED BED r ` a 0 CO
DINING 1 L IICOMMON I co N
— BED BED DINING \. o-�
Ni, , fq W CM
II ENTRY J i -- ,� L.
1 BED Q
� \ ENTRY / I�
tom A . =7i � / � / rp1 •
BATH BED ��
/
SEMI- _ -
COMMON BED I 1 i' I SEMI-
`""`L' = I BED
J / COMMON
I
7
;. I
j/ %\' FIRST FLOOR PLAN` SECOND FLOOR SIMILAR wz
\ s\ , , SCALE: 1/8°=1.-0" �� -aW 2~
((J) < Da)Z
a WCC2
PLAY GROUND u' O=
6 d
-1p0
�-_____----------' \ a CC M
o TWO
O J F-
Li_ Z W
Lg
* *
SCALE 1/8'=1'-0'
DATE 07-14-97
DRAWN BY JSW
CHECKED BTS
SHEET
F 2 D8
$ • •
II
,?
1 ri y d 1. \i.
S
1, ig i, ' I I : a ,!, :I
I ,.
. i ti.r o ,' I
I, 1 , ; I :
t �� � `w anti �-1 1 ��� ,
'
I I -- ' tY I:, .1
:: 1,I
,`gyp ^j . ..f.•' . 1 „tt
•.
T t .i." 1.• 1 r {
lY '' t is w ' 1t..'' S I .I ' } ra
,1.,..,._ •R• t �' 4 r 4 a "" merit i e.. r.
•
s: , 1 ty s . 'I-1
. ,1fir 111,' ,z f I rM,R
# S
{ f 1 X.• 1 II ,1 , I r
5�75` , I , I III•1, ,1 a'f 1 I I1 ,1,1 1' I'r I ' •.4,
• I , I l'I I ,: ,,, I, 11. ilalf 111 11 I'i /E Ettaw
4. I 1, .ta,' 'II- ,,,{a 1 .4:1 I. .,,�r`t,� i t 1 .,',. �'0."
'1 1, '''1 (i. ? Y �t f
�`: 11 1 .' < qa air
01
t' �I1'I 1i' 1� 1 1�t.�'II -. II,, t� f }r I
1 f .
I. I I I I , YI1 .,INJ I I I I �1 1 l . eit _ .
,.
{
a 34 I 11 1 li r y r'' ,1,
,,. ,._..,,,..,.-._::,
!1 a
'1 , -1II;. ;1 Lr, i ( t`1 ', ! III { ;, ,#'
' f x
}y 4F t1R1�1111157 '� ��'1.i"�..
g11 • s I� Aw '}�1-r`.l'
a _..: it l ..t'k...„, ._(-3 D- IP,, ,, ''.1:'::
SUBTITLE
CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE VIEW OWNER
TITLE PROPOSED J i3
VISION SPECIAL Pl'm q.
SINGLE MOTHERS HOME NEEDS HOUSING E a- =�
RENTON, WASHINGTON �m —o
�oA J m (4251 228-6356 ti 9 2 m 0
$ � * $
•
5590 REGCSTE ED
7 ..WALIACE
N.E. 5TH STREET ST TE OF WASHINGTON
4
1207 NORTH 77RD STREET
RENTON,WA 98056
(206)254-1862
/ [ <Z(..0
I
JC�3�p
M
CO
co 2 N
Z_
I 5WCV
\ -W`T
EVERGREENS&SHADE PLANTS h�\\II
ea
DOUG FlRNTREES t - I DOUGx FIR V
'I COSTIG
° ERA° 1
J ® 0.., t1db�IR;l \II`\ , $ $
IIIIII GARDEN
1,4 I L�I
unm, S • Z
S .910)) \LAWN #I
--LAWN PEA GRAVEL`, ROSES I �' �I
—— — W
L�- —— — r tl" ` DETENTIONlI Q
lik LAWN j,01.: tom_. .' �. POND AREA I I < Z
1y( lC _ Z W
z O
a
HRU oy# ;, SHRU: `-i-7� I CD a =C3
\Ir TREESRUR �� I • 1 • t�'I 2 U 0 Z
�'� el l I o W CC 2
,vi 'i
r I O M Q
MI 0z� / e�cpr4'+'sIAd
cc
`, SHRUBS :�� E4• 5+ ,�I I W J O
I / e� f 3�� �4Z Z ILI
2
- •.c- I U co
—
�� ` i� \� i T1�i nRf� %,.,.44...5.7314111,231
E• 5
a
L=
9
•
LANDSCAPE PLAN �' ' • SALE 1'=
DATE 07-14-97 20'-D'
DRAWN BY 20W
SCALE: 1"=20'-0" I
CHECKED BTS
SHEET
L 1 GE
4, 4 4,
., r CITY :F RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
ORDER TO CORRECT
DATE: 04/12/99 Violation Index No. C99-0132
Location of Violation: 501 UNION AV NE
Owner(tax-payer) : CAMERER SUSAN(VISION HOUSE)
Issued To: SEAN STEWART DBA JDI NORTHWEST
Address: 23837 108TH AVE SE STE .220
KENT, WA
98031
An inspection .of the above premises revealed violation(s) of The City of Renton
codes and ordinances listed, below. Compliance or corrective action must be
completed by: 05/13/1999 or a .CIVIL INFRACTION CITATION may be issued, and you
may be assessed a civil penalty in the amount ; noted below for each violation,
for each and every day or portion of a day. in which the violation continues
following the date and time set for correction.
First Three Days. of Violation $100.00, per day.
Second Three Days of Violation $200.00, per day
Third Three Days of Violation $300. 00, per day
Each Additional Day of Violation $500. 00, per day
CODE SECTION CITED: R.M.C. SECTION 4-4-130E
DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION: ILLEGAL REMOVAL OF ELEVEN (11) TREES
CORRECTIVE ACTION: YOU WILL BE REQUIRED TO REPLACE
THREE TREES FOR EVERY ONE TREE ILLEGALLY REMOVED.
THIS WILL BE A TOTAL OF THIRTY-THREE (33) TREES
PROVIDE DOCUMENTS TO THE CITY AGREEING TO THIS.
Issued By: ROBERT L. ARTHUR
Land Use Compliance Inspector
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Development Services Division
Phone No. : 425-430-7269
DELIVERY METHOD [ ] hand delivered 5.4 certified mail [ ]_ posted at site
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055
4-4-140C
•
greater of the following areas: (1)the place the lost tree(s) or a minimum of three
area defined by the drip line of the tree,or inches (3") in caliper.
(2) an area around the tree equal to one
foot (1')in diameter for each one inch 5. Stop Work: For any parcel on which
(1") of tree caliper. trees and/or ground cover are improperly re-
moved and subject to penalties under this
d. The applicant shall prune branches Section,the City shall stop work on any exist-
and roots,fertilize, and water as appro- ing permits and halt the issuance of any or all
priate for any trees and ground cover future permits or approvals until the property
which are to be retained. is fully restored in compliance with this Sec-
tion and all penalties are paid. (Ord. 4219,
L. VARIANCE PROCEDURES: 6-5-1989)
The Hearing Examiner shall have the authority to
grant variances from the provisions of this Sec-
tion pursuant to RMC 4-1-050F1q and 4-9-250. 4-4-140 WIRELESS
COMMUNICATION FACILITIES:
M. VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES:
A. PURPOSE:
1. Penalties: Penalties for any violation of The purpose of this Section is to establish general
any of the provisions of this Section shall be guidelines for the siting of wireless communica-
in accord with RMC 1-3-2, Civil Penalties. In tions facilities, including towers and antennas.
a prosecution under this Section, each tree
removed, damaged or destroyed will consti- B. GOALS:
tute a separate violation. (Ord.4351, The goals of this Section are to:
5-4-1992)
1. Encourage the location of towers in non-
2. Liability for Damage: Any person who residential areas and minimize the total num-
violates any provision of this Section or of a ber of towers throughout the community;
permit issued pursuant thereto shall be liable
for all damages to public or private property 2. Encourage strongly the joint use of new
arising from such violation,including the cost and existing tower sites;
of restoring the affected area to its condition
prior to such violation. 3. Encourage users of towers and antennas
to locate them,to the extent possible, in ar-
3. Restoration: Restoration shall include eas where the adverse impact on the commu-
the replacement of all improperly removed nity is minimal;
ground cover with species similar to those
which were removed or other approved spe- 4. Encourage users of towers and antennas
cies such that the biological and habitat val- to configure them in a way that minimizes the
ues will be replaced.Restoration shall include adverse visual impact of the towers and an-
installation and maintenance of interim and tennas; and
emergency erosion control measures until
such time as the restored ground cover and 5. Enhance the ability of the providers of
trees reach sufficient maturation to function in telecommunications services to provide such
compliance with the performance standards services to the community quickly,effectively,
identified in subsection E of this Section, Reg- and efficiently.
ulations for Land Clearing and Tree Cutting _
and the Development of Property; and C. EXEMPTION FOR AMATEUR RADIO,
RECEIVE ONLY ANTENNAS:
4. Replacement: For each tree which was This Section shall not govern any tower,or instal-
improperly cut and/or removed, replacement lation of any antenna, that is under seventy (70)
planting of a tree of equal size, quality and feet in height and is owned and operated by a fed-
species or up to three (3) trees of the same erally licensed amateur radio station operator or
species in the immediate vicinity of the tree(s) is used exclusively for receive only antennas.
which was removed. The replacement trees
will be of sufficient caliper to adequately re-
4-89
4-4-13.0K
•
3. Restrictions for Sensitive Areas: upon application by the property owner or man-
ager. Application for such an extension must be
a. Steep Slopes and Erosion Hazard made at least thirty (30) days in advance of the
Areas: For all properties, no land clear- expiration of the original permit and shall include
ing, tree cutting, or ground cover man- a statement of justification for the extension.
agement activities except enhancement
activities are permitted in areas with K. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR
slopes over forty percent (40%), slopes LAND DEVELOPMENT PERMITS:
over twenty five percent(25%)with Class
II or Class Ill landslide hazards, and 1. Prohibition Against Clear Cutting of
slopes over twenty five percent (25%) Trees:There shall be no clear cutting of trees
with Class II or Class Ill erosion hazards, on a site for the purpose of preparing that site
as identified by the King County Soils for future development. Trees may be re-
Survey, King County Sensitive Areas moved pursuant to a development permit
Map Folio or the City Environmentally which has been approved by the City.
• Sensitive Areas Maps.
2. Tree Preservation:Trees shall be main-
b. Wetlands,Shorelines,Creeks and tained to the maximum extent feasible on the
Streams: For all properties, no land property where they are growing.
clearing,tree cutting or ground cover
management activities except enhance- a. Tree Cutting Plan:Where it is not
ment activities are permitted in wetlands practicable to retain all trees on site due
including a minimum buffer area of to a proposed development, a plot plan
twenty five feet(25'), riparian corridors in- shall be submitted identifying those trees
cluding a minimum buffer area of twenty . which are proposed for removal.The City
five feet(25')from the high water mark of may require a modification of the land
the creek or stream, and in the two hun- clearing and tree cutting plan or the asso-
dred foot(200') State shoreline area. ciated land development plan to ensure
the retention of the maximum number of
I. ROUTINE VEGETATION trees.
MANAGEMENT PERMIT CONDITIONS:
The routine vegetation management permit may b. Plan Content:The plot plan shall
be denied or conditioned by the City to restrict the identify the location of all areas proposed
timing and extent of activities in order to further to be cleared including building sites,
the intent of this Section including: rights-of-way, utility lines, and ease-
ments.Clearing should not occur outside
1. Preserve and enhance the City's aes- of these areas or more than fifteen feet
thetic character and maintain visual screen- (15')from the foundation line of proposed
ing and buffering. buildings.
2. Preserve habitat to the greatest extent 3. Native Growth Protection Easements:
feasible.
a. Where Established: Native growth
3. Prevent landslides, accelerated soil protection easements may be estab-
creep, settlement and subsidence hazards. lished through the subdivision process in
environmentally sensitive areas including
4. Minimize the potential for flooding, ero- _but not limited to the following areas:
sion, or increased turbidity, siltation or other
form of pollution in a watercourse. i. A buffer area from the annual
high water mark of creeks, streams,
J. TIME LIMITS FOR PERMITS: lakes and other shoreline areas or
Any permit for routine vegetation management from the top of the bank of same,
shall be valid for one year from the date of issu- whichever provides good resource
ance.An extension may be granted by the Devel- protection.
opment Services Division for a period of one year
4 -87
4-4-130E
•
tree removal for public and private utilities, d. Land clearing and tree cutting shall
road rights-of-way and easements, and be conducted so as to expose the small-
parks. est practical area of soil to erosion for the
least possible time,consistent with an
4. Public or Private Utilities:Installation of approved build-out schedule.
distribution lines by public and private utilities
provided that such activities are categorically e. Land clearing and tree cutting shall,
exempt from the provisions of the State Envi- be conducted so as to preserve habitat
ronmental Policy Act and RMC 4-9-070, Envi- consistent with reasonable use of the
ronmental Review Procedures. property.
E. REGULATIONS FOR LAND F. ROUTINE VEGETATION
CLEARING AND TREE CUTTING AND MANAGEMENT PERMIT REVIEW
THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY: PROCESS:
•
. Permits for routine vegetation management shall
' 1. Plan Required:When a development be processed in accordance with the purposes
permit is submitted to the City it shall be ac- and criteria of this Section as follows:
companied by a land clearing and tree cutting
plan. This plan shall be reviewed as part of 1. Submittal: An application for a routine
the environmental review process pursuant vegetation management permit shall be sub-
to the State Environmental Policy Act and mitted to the Development Services Division
RMC 4-9-070, Environmental Review Proce- together with any necessary fees.
dures.
2. Time:The permit shall be reviewed ad-
2. Standards:All land clearing and tree ministratively within a reasonable period of
cutting activities shall conform to the perfor- time.
mance standards set forth in subsection K of
this Section and listed below unless other- G. APPLICATION FOR ROUTINE
wise recommended in an approved soil engi- VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT:
neering, engineering geology, hydrology or A routine vegetation management permit applica-
forest management plan and where the alter- tion shall contain the information requested in
nate procedures will be equal to or superior in RMC 4-8-120, Submittal Requirements.
achieving the policies of this Section.All land
clearing and tree cutting activities shall be H. REGULATIONS FOR ROUTINE
conditioned by the City to ensure that the fol- VEGETATION MANAGEMENT:
lowing performance standards are met.
1. Permit Required for Routine Vegeta-
a. The land clearing and tree cutting will tion Management on Undeveloped Prop-
not create or contribute to landslides, ac- erties: Any routine vegetation management
celerated soil creep, settlement and sub- on undeveloped property requires a permit
sidence or hazards associated with pursuant to this Section. Permitted activities
strong ground motion and soil liquefac- may include the use of mechanized equip-
tion. ment except as provided in subsection H3 of
this Section.
b. The land clearing and tree cutting will
not create or significantly contribute to 2. Permit Required to Use Mechanical
flooding, erosion, or increased turbidity, Equipment: The use of mechanical equip-
siltation or other form of pollution in a wa- ment for routine vegetation management,
tercourse. land clearing, tree cutting, landscaping, or
c. Land clearingand tree cuttingwill be gardening on developed, partially developed
or undeveloped property requires a permit
undertaken in such a manner as to pre- pursuant to this Section.
serve and enhance the City's aesthetic
character and maintain visual screening
and buffering.
4-86
) CITY JF RENTON
Hearing Examiner
Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman
October 9, 1997
Susan Camerer
2301 Vashon Avenue NE
Renton, WA 98056
Re: VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME
FILE No. LUA97-094,CU-H
Dear Ms. Camerer:
•
The Examiner's Report and Decision on the above referenced matter, which was issued on
September 22, 1997, was not appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance.
Therefore,this matter is considered final by this office and the file on your application is being
transmitted to the City Clerk as of this date.
Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required.
Sincerely,
Marilyn Moses
Hearing Examiner's Secretary
mm
cc: Jennifer Henning
Sandi Seeger, Development Services
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
County of King )
MARILYN MOSES , being first duly sworn,upon oath, deposes
and states:
That on the 22nd day of September ,1997, affiant deposited in the mail of the
United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage
prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition.
Signature: O A_f 1A
U
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this Fa day of S , 1997.
4/Meth\ ,):A /O.n(O'L
Notary PubU i i and jor t e State of Washington,
residing at ,(/a ,therein.
Application, Petition, or Case-No.: Vision Special Needs Housing
LUA-97-094, CU
The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record.
LAAMTNF Re PO rt
HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT
September 22, 1997
OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND DECISION
APPLICANT: Susan Camerer
Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home
File No.: LUA-97-094,CU-H
LOCATION: South of NE 5th Street and Union Avenue NE
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To construct a group home for homeless women and children
consisting of a 5,000 square foot two-unit structure and 9,200
square foot four-unit structure.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with
conditions
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the
Examiner on September 3, 1997.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining
available information on file with the application,field
checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner
conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows:
MINUTES
The following minutes are a summary of the September 9, 1997 hearing.
The legal record is recorded on tape.
The hearing opened on Tuesday, September 9, 1997,at 9:03 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor
of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
The following exhibits were entered into the record:
Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Vicinity map
application,proof of posting,proof of publication and
other documentation pertinent to this request.
Exhibit No.3: Site/landscape plan Exhibit No.4: Elevation drawing
Exhibit No. 5: Front view of four-plex Exhibit No. 6: Back view of four-plex
The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by JENNIFER HENNING,Project Manager,
Development Services, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,Washington 98055. The applicant
requests a conditional use permit for a group home located in the R-10(Residential- 10 units per acre)zone in
the Renton Highlands area. This is a request for development of two separate parcels in two phases. In phase
Susan Camerer
Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home
File No.: LUA97-094,CU-H
September 22, 1997
Page 2
one on the south portion of the site a two-unit structure and parking for the entire complex would be developed.
In phase two the parcel on the north portion of the property would be developed with a 4-unit structure. These
buildings would be 25 feet in height,two stories. Each of these units would be able to accommodate up to 10
persons. One would be a 5,000 square foot 2-unit structure located on the south parcel. A 9,200 square foot 4-
unit building would be constructed on the north parcel. This is transitional housing for single mothers that are
homeless. This transitional housing would be expected to serve the residents for up to two years. Each single
mother and her children would share kitchen,dining and living areas of the dwelling unit with another single
mother and her children. There would be shared parking. There would be a common play area in the center of
the parcel. There would be orchard, lawn areas,vegetable and flower gardens,perennial beds and such. The
site is currently vacant and is heavily vegetated with under-story vegetation. There are 11 existing large
Douglas fir trees located on the north portion of the site and,the applicant has stated that they intend to preserve
6 of those existing trees. There would be 2,500 cubic yards of fill material imported to the site. A storm water
detention basin or pond area would be constructed adjacent to Union Avenue NE.
The site is located on the west side of Union just south of NE 5th. It is just north of a Puget Power substation
and it is south of the development called Village on Union. There are apartments and condominiums in the
surrounding area,but primarily the character of the neighborhood is single family residential. To the south on
NE 4th is a commercial corridor with many services such as grocery stores,video stores,gas stations,mini-
marts. South and to the west about half a mile away is Renton Technical College which is important to the
residents of this particular project. The residents of this particular project would be working with each other in
setting up a more traditional home environment where they can depend on each other to help watch each
other's children and such. The residents will be close enough to walk to the services on NE 4th and won't
require as many vehicles. They will also be given bus passes if necessary. They will be encouraged to
complete their education. It is transitional housing with a protected environment. There are a number of rules
that the residents would have to adhere to such as curfews and overnight visitors.
The primary common area is the play area in the center between the two structures. It will have a play structure
and be set in lawn. There will be fences that create a more private area for all the residents to use as a common
feature. About 22,000 square feet of the site would be landscaped. Staff members will not live on site but they
would occupy a 200 square foot office during the daytime.
This project required environmental review and the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)issued a
Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M). The applicant is required to have a temporary
erosion control plan,to pay fire,parks and traffic mitigation fees, and to limit their construction hours to
between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. They would be able to work on
Saturday as arranged with the Development Services Division.
This project meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan plans and goals. It contributes to a sense of
community and neighborhood identity and creates development that takes advantage of a walkable
neighborhood. It is visually attractive, safe and healthy. In terms of the housing policies,one of the objectives
is to increase the supply of special needs housing. This does meet the policies that look for projects which offer
a high level of access to shopping services and other facilities,provides service by public transportation or
provides another means to meet the transportation needs of residents.
In terms of meeting the zoning code,the intent of the R-10 zone is to provide a mix of residential styles
including single family detached, single family attached, duplex,tri-plex and four-plex. While these are not
Susan Camerer
Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home
File No.: LUA97-094,CU-H
September 22, 1997
Page 3
considered duplexes and four-plexes per se, it does meet the intent of the type of buildings intended in that
zone.
In terms of the development standards of the zone,the proposal meets the requirements regarding minimum lot
area, lot width, depth and setback requirements. The lot coverage in this zone is allowed up to 50 percent and
this proposal would result in 16 percent lot coverage for phase 1 and 26 percent for phase 2, so it is well within
lot coverage requirements. The location of the refuse and recyclable collection areas is adjacent to the parking
area on the east side of the two unit structure.
A parking modification to reduce the number of parking spaces has been requested by the applicant. It is
currently being reviewed by the Public Works Administrator. If the modification for fewer spaces is not
granted, applicant would have to meet the requirements and it would result in having the two-unit structure
pushed further to the west.
The proposal sites the buildings in an east-west direction so that the appearance of the building bulk from
Union would be reduced as well;thus it gives the appearance more of a single family character when viewed
from the street. Vehicles will enter and exit the site from Union and the parking area is set back about 40 feet
from Union. The driveway does not hinder pedestrian movement along Union,although the landscaping that is
being proposed adjacent to Union is somewhat of a concern because of a required sight triangle. Staff
recommends that landscaping in the 20 foot sight triangle be modified to eliminate any type of vegetation that
might hinder views of people entering or exiting the site.
The police department has made recommendations for adequate lighting to provide for the security of the
residents, and a lighting plan is required as a condition of approval. The landscaping is exceptionally good for
this project. The parking spaces will also allow for skateboarding,basketball or whatever. Staff has requested
fencing along the west boundary of the site to create more privacy for the residents. There are adequate public
services and utilities to serve this project. The Renton School District has sufficient space in their system to
accommodate the number of persons that may be attending schools.
Staff is recommending that this project be approved subject to the following conditions: (1)compliance with
the ERC mitigation measures; (2)revision of site plan for the landscaping to take care of the vision problem on
Union Avenue; (3)provide a screening fence along the west boundary; (4)revision of site plan to provide
number of parking spaces, if required; (5)site lighting plan be provided.
Susan Camerer,2301 Vashon Avenue NE,Renton,Washington 98056,applicant here, stated that since 1990
Vision Special Needs Housing has provided non-profit privately managed transitional housing environments
that enable interim residents to get back on their feet and break the debilitating cycle of homelessness,poverty
and abuse. In King County last year nearly 38,000 times single mothers and children were refused shelter
because there were no beds available. Children make up the largest population of homeless individuals. A
preliminary look at the 1997 statistics for Washington shows another significant increase in the number of
times single moms and their kids have been refused shelter. The proposed site is ideal for the residents as it is
close to shopping and other services, daycare providers, schools,a college and directly on a bus line.
No state license is required for this project. The play area would be constructed during the first phase.
Neil Watts,Plan Review Supervisor,Development Services Division, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,
Renton,Washington 98055, stated that the initial site plan showed a detention system for drainage which may
Susan Camerer
Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home
File No.: LUA97-094,CU-H
September 22, 1997
Page 4
not be needed. This area has good soils and some method of infiltration may be utilized. This would reduce
the amount of detention required,perhaps reducing that to nothing. That is both a cost savings and provides a
recharge to the aquifer and also limits the amount of runoff coming into the system.
The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and
no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:44 a.m.
FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS&DECISION
Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The applicant, Susan Camerer for Vision Special Needs Housing,filed a request for approval of a
Conditional Use Permit to establish two group homes.
2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation
and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1.
3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official,issued a Declaration of
Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal.
4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter.
5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal.
6. The subject site is located in the 400 block of Union Avenue NE. The site is on the west side of Union
just south of NE 5th Street(if it were extended to the west).
7. The subject site is classified R-10, a classification it received with the adoption of the new Zoning
Code in June 1993.
8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1480 in April 1954.
9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as
suitable for the development of Residential Options including low scale, low density multifamily
residential uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the
Plan.
10. The applicant proposes developing two buildings on two adjoining lots to serve as "transitional"
housing for homeless and/or battered women and children. Residents would have an income that is less
than 30%of the median income. Residents would live in the homes for up to two years while they
acquire the living skills and incomes necessary to find their more permanent living arrangements.
11. The two side-by-side buildings will share their common amenities, some of which will straddle the
common property line while some will be located on one or the other of the lots.
12. The adjoining parcels are each just over 17,000 square feet. Each is approximately 210 feet deep(east
to west)and approximately 80 feet wide(north to south frontage along Union).
Susan Camerer
Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home
File No.: LUA97-094,CU-H
September 22, 1997
Page 5
13. While the lots are fairly level,approximately 2,500 cubic yards of fill materials would be imported to
the site. A detention pond straddling the common property line between the two parcels of the subject
site would be created near Union Avenue NE.
14. The project will be phased. Phase 1 will include the development of a 2-unit 5,000 square foot
residential building on the south parcel along with most of the amenities and necessary infrastructure.
(Staff report has the buildings/phases reversed.) The proposed features that would be developed would
include a centrally located children's play area,lawn and orchard landscaping,parking near Union on
the southern(Phase 2)parcel,the detention system and needed utility lines. A small office component
of approximately 200 square feet in area will be part of the site plan.
15. Phase 2 would involve the construction of a 4-unit 9,200 square foot residence on the northern parcel.
16. Both buildings will be two stories and approximately 25 feet in height. The buildings would contain
peaked intersecting roofs and horizontal siding. The larger,4-unit building,will be U-shaped. The 2-
unit building will have a number of articulations in its facade.
17. The buildings will be secured by fencing that runs between the buildings. Staff has recommended that
additional fencing or landscaping be used to buffer surrounding property from the proposed use.
18. A tree survey showed eleven large Douglas fir trees on the site. The applicant proposes retaining six of
those trees. The retained trees are located in the northwest and northeast corners of the subject site.
19. A fruit tree orchard would be planted along the west portion of the southerly lot. Formal landscape
plantings would be clustered around the proposed entry driveway in the southeast corner of the site. A
small garden would be located east of the 4-plex unit. There would also be accent landscaping around
each of the buildings.
20. Staff has calculated the parking required based on the apparently multiple family nature of the complex
(1.75 stalls per unit)requiring 12 stalls plus the one(1)stall required for the proposed office use.The
applicant has proposed eight(8)stalls. The applicant suggests the residents of this complex will rely
on walking to the nearby commercial uses and mass transit available in the area. The applicant has
requested a parking deviation to provide less than that required.
21. The R-10 zone requires a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet for a duplex unit or 10,000 square feet
for a four-plex, a minimum lot width of 50 feet and a minimum lot depth of 65 feet. The two lots both
exceed these minimum standards. The buildings also comply with setbacks by providing more than the
20 feet required for front and rear yards. Both would maintain a 25 foot rear yard and 488 and 78 foot
front yards(duplex/fourplex respectively). There would be the 10 foot side yard required for both
structures.
22. The area in which the subject site is located represents a transition from commercial uses along NE 4th
to multiple family around the subject site to single family uses north of the site. A power substation is
located south of the site with apartments located west of the site and Village on Union north of the site.
23. Group homes for six unrelated individuals are permitted in the R-10 zone. Group homes for more than
six individuals requires a Conditional Use Permit.
Susan Camerer
Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home
File No.: LUA97-094,CU-H
September 22, 1997
Page 6
CONCLUSIONS:
1 The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest,will
not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria
found in Section 4-31-36(C)which provides in part that:
a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan;
b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location;
c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property;
d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any;
e. Parking,unless otherwise permitted,will not occur in the required yards;
f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project;
g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property;
h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property
where appropriate; and
i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal.
The requested conditional use appears justified.
2'. The outright provision of a multi-faceted,multi-family unit meets the immediate Comprehensive Plan
goal of multiple residential options for the subject site. In addition,the Comprehensive Plan addresses
special needs housing including shelters such as that proposed by this development.
3'. The Comprehensive Plan suggests that such uses are appropriate in the community. In addition,the
applicant notes that approximately 63%of their population in other of their facilities have Renton
mailing addresses. There are no similar complexes in this immediate neighborhood although there are
other low-income and senior housing units in the Highlands and the City in general.
4. The two two-story,relatively low-rise buildings will be heavily landscaped and set back substantially
from the street. They are not excessively bulky and there will be articulations in both their front and
rear facades to distract from their size. They maintain the required yards to rear although this will be
treated as ten(10)foot sideyards due to their orientation inward toward each other. The applicant
should provide a fence to provide privacy for both the onsite residents as well as neighboring uses.
5'. Again,the two-story buildings not exceeding 25 feet tall,will blend with both the multiple family and
single family uses located on adjacent properties.
6. The Administrator had not determined whether the proposed reduction in parking from 13 stalls to 8
stalls was appropriate. This makes some aspects of the site plan problematic and subject to
modification. While there appears to be room for 13 stalls,they would definitely squeeze out some of
the amenities such as the play area or the orchard. It would appear that parking could also be moved
forward or eastward but may not be permitted within the established front yard setback.
Susan Camerer
Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home
File No.: LUA97-094,CU-H
September 22, 1997
Page 7
7. The proposed plan shows all of the parking as well as the driveway on the southerly lot. This could be
a problem in the future if the parcels which are separate legal lots were sold off separately. In order to
assure that segregation of the parcels does not deprive one or the other of the parcels of parking,the
applicant shall be required to create cross access and shared parking easements. In addition,a potential
conversion of the units to "ordinary"housing could create parking problems if the deviation from the
parking standards occurs.
8. The plan demonstrates reasonable vehicular and pedestrian circulation. A sidewalk connects the units
to the street.
9. The residential aspect of the complex should not introduce untoward noise or light into the community.
10. As noted a fence should be included in the design to separate the subject site from its neighbors. There
definitely is adequate landscaping even if some of it is lost to provide additional parking.
11. The area is served by City utilities and is located in an area where such utilities are readily available.
12. In conclusion,the proposed project appears to be a well designed complex which should be a visual
asset to the City as well as providing a much needed community service.
DECISION:
The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall be required to create cross-access and shared parking easements between the two
parcels.
2. The applicant shall record restrictive covenants that require that adequate parking be provided if there
is any conversion of either parcel to normal residential purposes.
3. The applicant shall comply with the mitigation measures which were required by the Environmental
Review Committee prior to issuance of a building permit.
4. The applicant shall be required to revise the site landscape plan to retain a clear vision area(defined as
the area bounded by the street property lines and the driveway,20 feet from the point of intersection.)
5. The applicant shall be required to revise the site plan to include a 6-foot high wood fence or equivalent
screening along the north, south and west property lines in order to screen the project from abutting
properties. The design of the fence shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development
Services Division, and must be accomplished prior to the issuance of any construction/building
permits.
6. The applicant shall be required to revise the site plan to provide the number of parking spaces which
the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator determines is necessary for the site. The revised
site plan is to be submitted to the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any
construction/building permits.
7. The applicant shall be required to submit a site lighting plan which demonstrates that adequate security
lighting is provided that is focused and directed to avoid off-site light spillover. The lighting plan shall
Susan Camerer
Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home
File No.: LUA97-094,CU-H
September 22, 1997
Page 8
be submitted to the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of any construction/building
permits.
ORDERED THIS 22nd day of September, 1997.
<o &
FRED J.KAUF
HEARING EXA ER
TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of September, 1997 to the parties of record:
Jennifer Henning Susan Camerer Neil Watts
200 Mill Avenue S 2301 Vashon Avenue NE 200 Mill Avenue S
Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98055
Dave Wright Jay S.Wallace Stanley Stone
416 2nd Ave.Ext. So. 1207 N 33rd Street 401 Park Place,#220
Seattle,WA 98104 Renton,WA 98056 Kirkland,WA 98033
Arthur Swanson Barbara Schellert Beatrice McNeil
4512 Talbot Road S 3506 Park Avenue N 517 Union Avenue N
Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98059
David Kleiber Shawn Martin
504 Shelton Pl.NE 512 Tacoma Pl.NE
Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98056
TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of September, 1997 to the following:
Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Administrator
Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director
Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical.Services Director
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official
Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant
Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler
South County Journal
Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in
writing on or before 5:00 p.m..October 6. 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the
Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the
discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written
request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This
request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may,
after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper.
Susan Camerer
Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home
File No.: LUA97-094,CU-H
September 22, 1997
Page 9
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal
be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements.
Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City
Hall.
If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the
executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file.
You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants.
The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may
occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not
communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use
process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council.
All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all
interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the
evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court.
The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as
Appeals to the City Council.
Z 0 k:t
----r—=-----!...
11,
0 .A►;.1, 4,,,,e.. •, I � �
� _Lfir l 11 I
40;ii,:i,
E .,.
I $4 I ow.
z I J '
Ca' ©• •`
I - I
Him. 1 S70
/ c o
od a
i ..# }kr, i
..,,,
��li. _ A , :..
...,.....::::: . .,
/", c \ I/
a
-- r p,
fel: .,,! 4.i •
• • - - -— - -
UNION AVENUE N.E. _ — — _ _ — —
z
i-ri
1 •
U,
Project Location: South of NE 5th Street and Union Avenue NE
•o a, `�'t�ct ,off :. y l :t
�: @ats=[a• ;"t. is , .,`
a "R t u— 'f1:•Z. 'fl. •'.',- yam;
ri P,i i!:::r.7i.t .•V ttc c.
'-1>21:Pr ,a'd R'
` of w e „,,
•
1 I 4.%. n ..� 9 Q.
'M
. •: . ® 1 e. sr
. . 5"&m• � IrI •• .• e %4 0 0--4
r. c?p e wan. CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN OWNER s
—1 'o '"`F PROPOSED• VISION SPECIAL -gg'o`. A
SINGLE MOTHERS HOME NEEDS HOUSING o' 'y
RENTON, WASHINGTON
�g m e (425) 228-6356 z A x,, 8
.
i I ';I
`1: !1 ii ; ,;ii
itjit
•�• ti li(
• (� 1 -ta
t,i,L
I :,
Tit
! aLi! •
! ,,.:,
...,„
• l !.i ! ii ;.
• !i f..
ii: i
i II Pi .
• E Ii Iii.
• 'II! is
I!I
'll' i
i.
4
V
iltil,p
ti,4
.t
liNii,1:tii
:` ilillftli;?;
itl:ii!aii
tttiiiiiiiit
LA rn iiiiii:i7;ii
a ' I•:tt.•
X atti!;:ati
;:ti:tgiii•
Fri :tiil!ii:ii!
o�q Z7 'i ,,iviils .
II O it't?q-1 ;i t .
o • ::;i ICE44;
•
FT .i{
Z i tl? izi
Erl
D I: I
illtir�1 4.l
fij! I 3r
'it .rt..
Z ! 0 i 10 I i i! I7?'.
st.
I III liIji
\r' _ 9_6
24.-0"
m x R$> SORTIE GENERALIZED ELEVATIONS OWNER "s
o "'� PROPOSED VISION SPECIAL P!§ e`
SINGLE MOTHERS HOME NEEDS HOUSING m'- i<• N
w N o. • RENTON, WASHINGTON (425) 228-6356 '92 4 o
1►
vF;.,
C ITY� RE NT:O
Planning/Building/Public Woiks.D'epartment:"•''" _
Gre Zimmerman P.E. Administrator',
Jesse Tanner,Mayor • gg . . ..
•
September 18, 1997 0 § @ § Q V 15
1)
Vision Special Needs Housing . SEP 1 8 1gg
PO Box 2951.
Renton;WA 98056 .
Attn: Susan Camerer, • r RfMON
NER
Program Director EXAM
SUBJECT: VISION.SPECIAL NEEDS DOUSING GROUP-HOME PARKING
MODIFICATION REQUEST(FILE.NO.LUA-97-094, CU,ECF)
Dear Ms. Camerer:
We have reviewed your letter requesting modification to the Renton Parking and Loading Code, "
and our response follows.
Background: In your letter youlseek.approvafrom the City of Renton to develop a Group Home
consisting of two structures, a•5,000 square"foot two-unit"structure, and a 9,200 square foot four-
unit building. The Group Home would.serve as transitional,housing for homeless single mothers
(making less than 30%of:the'median income).and;their.children. The housing is expected•to serve
a resident for a period of up:to two years:,- Each single mother and her children:would"share
kitchen, dining, and living areas of the dwelling.unit;;with,one or possibly other single mothers
and her children. 'Units in thegroup home couldaccomnodate a maximum of 10_persons:(two:to
three adults and their children). .However,;it-;is unlikely that the maximum:number. of.persons
would occupy a given unit,:and that-would"'happen in the:rare instance when a pregnant woman and
her children occupied a unit';with other mothers and their children. :
You are proposing a total of 8 sparking spaces for the six-unit group home, or 1.33 parking spaces
per unit. Of these,seven are proposed to be standard parking stalls, while one would be accessible
per ADA standards. The Parking and Loading Ordinance does not specifically.address Group
Homes,but does require two-(2)parking spaces per unit for each single family dwelling, and also
two (2) parking spaces per unit for each two-family dwelling. Multi-family dwellings require 1.5
parking spaces per unit, plus one guest parking space for every four units in developments with
more than five units. There are several ways to interpret the Parking and Loading Ordinance for
the six-unit group home,the Code could be interpreted to require either:
1) A total of 12 parking spaces — 1.5 parking spaces per each unit(6 units
x 1.5 parking stalls=9 stalls),plus one guest parking space for each four
units in developments with five or more units(6 units x 0.25 guest parking
spaces = 1.5 spaces),.plus one space for an employee occupying the 200
square foot.office (9 resident spaces +' 1.5 guest spaces + 1 employee
space= 12 parking spaces);or,
2) A-total of 12 to 12.5 parking spaces — 2 parking spaces:for each two-
unit dwelling'(two units x.2 parking stalls = 4 stalls);plus 1.75:resident
and guest parking spaces for each unit in the four-unit structure(4 units x
Document2
200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055
e
m r8 • ,
".Se�to tie 1 1997-
P .
__•__-,__ _ __ _Al � - _ —_ _ _ _ _ -
'- V,,. ', QL •„ '}175 parking stalls-.7 stalls),plus one:employee.space,,.ani poss bl 0 5
..-:,s=`'y '` - - '••;additional;....guest.:space- for-:the •two-unit structure (depending. `� .:.� •" :. upon=. -
• : ' interpretation•of the'guest.parking requirement.(4 resident spaces for'the
. .. '..two-unit structure+7 resident/guest spaces for the four-unit.structure+.:1 ;.p.
employee:Parking space, +_possibly 0.5 guest spaces for 'the.two•unit
•
-"-- ± .structure•=.12- 12:5
�• "•o .r�w�N`��� parking spaces);or; .. "•
•. 3- .. "A total of 13 parking spaces —2 parkings aces:fora each unit,.and one:::p h P .P .
additional space.for,the'daytime employee(6.units X.2 parking stalls.= 12' - ' •
stalls;plus 1 employee-stall= 13 parking spaces). . . : . -
Justification:..You are seeking a parking.modification:in•order:•to'provide 8,parking spaces, rather, .
' " than the 12 to.,13 parking spaces noted above based•on the interpreted Code requirements,for the .. . `
' •• following reasons: • _
' •1. • Low rate of car ownership. You state"from,.your experience with other similar projects in
the Puget`Sound Region, that�low-income residents,m this•type of transitional housing do , '
not'own as many.cars as.do•higher-income.families.:;;Over the_past.three years,=;only one- •• i
third of the adult•residents in Vision:Special Needs.H• ousing's single mothers program.
owned a car.
2:". Availability of mass transit:...The projectsite at Union:Avenue,NE and NE 5th Street is ,
•located'=directly on a Metro transit bus line.-.Routes 908/9.09.and-_114.travel on"Union'. " I
•
Ave•nue:NE,:.and connect:to:.the 11.1 route:;on the.NE.3rd/NE 4th Street corridor.'Vision
' Special Needs;Housing provides bus;passes'to residents;who need'them.,
3. .Convenience:of:"nearby,; services.' N'The site.'is within,:,wall ngfbicycling",distance .of` I,
•educational,:',commercial,•retail and service .businesses-on the NE,4th Street..corridor._ 1
Renton Technical..College..is?located" approximately.,one-lialf'.mile from;.the:-proposed {
project: :Grocery shopping;\daycare;..beauty salons,-dry;:cleaning and,other,services,are . !1
located:within',one-quarter mile'of-the'site,:along the NE.4th Street commercial corridor.
. Kiwanis:Park'is located approximately;five blocks°north of the site. ••
4.. Availability of,existing on-street.parking. ;Union Avenue NE:provides on-street parking ; ,
. :on the west side-of Union Avenue NE that could be utilized for overflow guest parking if .
needed..However,the-residents of-the.group'home are subject to a curfewirom 10 p.ni:to
• 9 a.m.;and no overnight guests are:allowed. ' Visiting hours are limited to those times (9 .
a.m:to 10 p.m.)when street parking is generally more available. -
5. • • Amenities gained through-;a'reducti_on of.parking. The.-site plan for the_proposed Vision- .,-.. - -
Special Needs'Housing',Group Home.includes"ornamental landscaped gardens, an orchard,
-a vegetable/flower garden, common lawn areas, perennial:.borders and .a common i,
children's-play area.:.,These,communal garden, orchard,..lawn and play areas are possible,.'
in.'part; due to a.reduction,'in ,.parking spaces. : 'These amenities create••the. practical_ , �i
difficulty in providing the required amount of parking: "In:order to have the common lawn,
-garden,orchard.and play;areas,less parking is proposed However,•based on the-historical • - • •
anecdotal'information submitted,by the'applicant,the'amount;of parking provided meets or d ' •
. exceeds the,need of similar projects,and in turn,provides amenities encouraged by policies
of the`City's Comprehensive Plan to:improve quality of life: • - ,
- ..
Page 3
September 18, 1997
Furthermore, while additional parking could be accommodated on the site by moving the
two-unit structure to the west, the ability of residents to monitor their children in the
common play area could be affected. Both the two-unit and four-unit buildings were •
proposed in their respective locations and in relation to the play yard to allow clear line-of-
sight to the play area, so that residents may observe their children from inside the,unit.
Relocation of the structures to provide additional parking could affect the sight lines from
the units to the play area.
Finally,less impervious surface results with the reduced number of parking spaces.
6. Likelihood of conversion to a more traditional multi-family housing project. You state
that it is unlikely that the group home project would convert to another type of residential
housing project in the near future. Vision Special Needs Housing currently has a contract
with the State of Washington to provide transitional housing for 50 years. The units in the
group home are somewhat unique in that each unit has five bedrooms, and shares large
kitchen/dining and common areas. . Conversion to non-traditional housing, such as
partially-assisted or assisted care "senior housing would be more likely than conversion to
traditional multi-family dwellings. In';the case of assisted care or senior housing, the
number of vehicles owned by residents::would be anticipated to be similar to the group
home rather than the number of vehicles owned by residents in traditional multi-family
developments. In the.case of conversion to six units of multi-family housing, the required
amount of parking would be 11 spaces,(6 units.x 1.75 parking spaces per unit = 10.5
parking spaces). A restrictive covenant could be recorded on the property to alert future
potential purchasers of the need to'_ineetparking requirements if the use as a group home
maws.
7. Reduced parking:requirements for'subsidized housing=supporting information. The
reduction of parking,is requested for a group home situation. As noted in the March 12,
1997 parking modification decision for the Jefferson Avenue Family Housing project,
information from the American Planning:Association indicates that several cities recognize
a lower need for parking spaces for subsidized housing tenants (Bay City, Michigan
requires one space for each two dwelling units; and, Gainsville, Florida requires one space
per dwelling unit). You have provided anecdotal information from other single mother's
housing projects operated by Vision.Special Needs Housing that states only one-third of
the adult residents own automobiles. It is expected that two or three unrelated adults and
their children would occupy each unit.. This would result in at most 12 to 18 adults
occupying the proposed six units. If one-third of the adult residents owned vehicles as has
been the case in the past,then it would be expected that four to six parking spaces would
be needed for the residents.
Previously, the Jefferson Avenue Family Housing project (LUA-97-088, SA, ECF) and
Burnett Avenue Family Housing (LUA-97-070, SA, ECF) were granted modifications
from the required number of parking stalls.. In the case of the 18-unit Jefferson Avenue
Family Housing apartment project, a reduction of two parking spaces, from 32 spaces to
30 spaces was approved. This proposal featured four two-bedroom and 14 three-bedroom
units in five buildings. The Burnett Avenue Family Housing project was for a six-unit
multi-family development,with the six units all in one structure. In that case, a reduction
of two parking spaces,from 11 spaces to 9 spaces was ultimately approved.
Page 4 ;,.. .
September 18, 1997•
Discussion. According to the City Code, approval for the deviation from parking standards is -=- -
justified when there are practical difficulties in carrying out the provisions of the Parking and
Loading chapter of the City Code, provided that such modifications: conform to the intent and
purpose of the Code; can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended;
will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity; and, can be made.prior-to
detailed engineering and design.
!p
The applicant has provided supporting data to indicate that a reduction in the number of required •
parking spaces is warranted to meet the use and situation intended; since fewer than one-third of
the adult residents in this type of program own vehicles; and because of limitations on guest
visiting, the proximity of the project to schools, parks, and services (grocery, daycare, etc.),
availability of transit and provision of bus passes for residents. However, reducing the amount of
parking stalls from the required 12 or 13 parking places to eight parking stalls represents a
reduction in the requirement by at least one-third. This reduction is significant, in that it could
introduce an average of 4 to 5 vehicles to occupy street parking spaces, or other off site parking 1{i
options. This imposes an undue impact on the neighborhood and absorbs an excessive amount of
street parking capacity. It also creates'an inconvenience factor for the tenants and their guests.
It appears that with some minor site plan modifications, it would be possible to provide 10 parking
stalls for the project. With~'this more modest modification to the Parking and Loading Code, j
adverse impacts to other properties,in the vicinity would not be expected, especially in the near
future, as guests could be accommodated in thel•paiking lot,or by using.two or three street parking
spaces along Union Avenue NE fronting the project:.: .. .
The request is being made as part of the project application,well.;in advance of detailed engineering
and design. It is possible for you to revise thesite plan at this stage in order to provide additional
parking spaces on the site,however,the on-site amenities would-be reduced, potentially resulting in
the loss of a portion of the orchard, .reduction in the area.devoted to perennial beds and/or
perimeter landscaping which screens the site from Union Avenue NE: The greatest impact to on- '
site amenities would occur if you were required to•provide:13 parking spaces. It appears that the
addition of two parking places to your proposal{for a total of-10)would create minor impact to the '
site plan,and minimize the loss of amenities.
Considering your supporting information it appears that a reduction in the parking requirement is
justified. However, the requested reduction of five spaces is not supported. It appears that two
additional parking spaces could be accommodated between the proposed parking area and Union
Avenue NE without impacting the site plan substantially. It also appears that a portion of the
landscaped area could be placed in reserve and converted to parking if actual use demonstrates a
need for added parking stalls.
Decision. The City approves a slight reduction in the amount of parking required by Code for the
Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home, such that a minimum of 10 off-street parking spaces
are provided,and that certain conditions are met. These conditions are proposed as follows:
1: The applicant shall be required to revise the site plan to provide 10 off-street
parking spaces on the site,with no more than 30%of the spaces compact spaces. j
f9
Page 5
September 18, 1997
2. The applicant shall be required to provide a diagram illustrating how 12 to 13
parking spaces could be accommodated on the project site, in the event that the
buildings are sold and converted to a more traditional use.
3. The applicant shall be required to record a restrictive covenant on the property to
provide additional parking per City Code requirements in the event that the
property is sold and converted to a residential use other than a group home.
4. The applicant shall be required to revise the parking lot configuration illustrated
on the site plan to meet current Code standards for parking stall size and aisle
width (minimum 9 foot wide by 20 foot long stalls, minimum aisle width of 24
feet).
Sincerely,
r�eTg
Gregg Zimnrman,Administrator
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
cc: Fred Kaufman,Hearing Examiner
Jennifer Toth Henning
PARKING MODIFICATION REQUEST
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING
Vision Special Needs Housing is requesting a Deviation from Standards for required number of parking
spaces for the proposed project.
Our proposal is to build a duplex and a fourplex totaling six dwelling units of transitional housing for
homeless single mothers and their children making less than 30%of the median income. The duplex
would also have an attached 200 square foot office area to service the residents. The requirements would
require 13 spaces. We propose to provide seven spaces and one accessible space totaling eight spaces. We
put forth as evidence to support our case that the amount of parking we propose will be sufficient to serve
the residents of this project:
1. Low rate of car ownership- Our experience with very,low income residents of this type of housing do
not own as many cars as would higher income families. Over the past three years,it was found that only
one-third of the adult residents in our current single mothers program owned a car. The proposed project
would house only female head of household families.
2. Mass-transit service- The site is located directly on a metro busline. Vision Special Needs Housing
provides bus passes to residents who need them.
3. Nearby services- The site is within walking distance of grocery shopping, daycare and services.
4. On street parking available on project's street frontage- The project fronts on a street for a total of 160
feet. This frontage could provide on-street parking for five cars and could serve as overflow visitor
parking for the proposed project on unusual occasions of extreme parking need.
Vision Special Needs Housing is committed long term to owning and operating transitional housing. We
currently have a contract with the State of Washington for 50 years. Also,the design of the home is
specific to the population we propose to house in the units. For these reasons,it is highly unlikely that the
proposed facility would change to market rate housing in the future.
We hope these points are satisfactory evidence to support our case for eight parking spaces instead of the
required 13.
Thank you for considering this request.
Sincerely,
Susan M.Camerer
Program Directors
;,. r.
RENT ON.
•
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING
PROJECT NARRATIVE •
VSNH proposes to build a small complex to house homeless single mothers and their children for up to
two years. The proposed site is located at 5xx Union Ave.NE,.in the Renton Highlands. It is made up of
two nearly identical lots. Both lots are 82.42 X 210.86. The site has no current usage, improvements or
special features. There are no existing structures that might have views obstructed as a result of the
proposed project.
VSNH plans to build two buildings in two phases. The first phase consists of a two story duplex with an
office area on the south lot.The duplex will house four to six families and be approximately 5,000 square
feet.The building will be a maximum of 25 feet high. The south lot will also contain eight parking spaces
for both buildings. Completion date of the proposed project will be January 1999.
The second phase will consist of building a 9,200 square foot fourplex on the north lot to house eight to
twelve female head of household families with two families sharing one unit. Both buildings will wrap
around a large secure play area for the resident children.
Access to both properties will be from Union Ave.NE to the south lot..,Lot coverage for the proposed
buildings is 21%. Total proposed impervious surface is 39%.
Proposed off site improvements are a sewer extension and manhole. Existing curb cutouts will be utilized.
E C,171Vrr
1 6 1997
O VELU:h.1,_z;tT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
.
•
.4 - •r ,.• J �:i:•./'q7,. _ _.-.,gel "i'_ ... a.:.i��
•
.,Jc „? •, 8 0 W9 '1 •. ° 64 s'.63 d 62
61 . 60 a9 sil M 4.'�'s°,+�� 39 - 38 Y -37 Y., �..33 ;
• N e.s.vr T-5 . 70.11 6154 60.04 6664 1 16 L1256 \\\��
• t e :-` 2�,., -`68.rc..;.\ , 300.21 321.25 'F 973-s5• •
EO 60 �68.324�;�I DIM
�.`�'' ,il3oN . : „� 6THECT. • I '\��
. �, ,..„ UNION 670'" 29 30E.
31 34
1 '' uS V4" B' V_N C•, .1�' •'�:r- -cz • - CONDOM I N I U M ti Steve Harris ti 1'J• = 32.' vnz
• 1. Ile .41T Z,4 . I : i'. 6 UNITS
,I• 3 1.09 Ac.- • i B �• m 33
�, � C2 1 ® 28 f\ 3832 t - is
r N Iij
„ c�s 40�10 rT�•M 9�, e�� 37 �Irt �2 13 30� 252 aa.B7 s 1J{t
1T �„ I , W N;E -6TH- P
oN E 17. Sj F. 36 59 j .,, ., co N c 3y 39.45 60'o i6.9"S
In e 6 o - I y .n Ill _' r- 60 '9 v� I
s4.a 6TH PL. IX $ 65 i 0.56Ac. 1.IS Ad_6 - 5/ •,
35©c , � _ nn ',,
1.Vas.% • 5. a ;' s _`` 6 23 • lit 'S°P .IE°J 15448 ® -;�' 7/ s 26 25 24 �/2�3� 22 1 -
. - -r �- l.
• $O IS.l$'73T.11 71 lelL - / .55. 5.3.n.N. gQ. •i l• , IZ.,
L.� 7 '.. - z' 355.11• -••• 265.34 - ••• 113 104.66� 5552 60 '+ 49.55 '
r
761(B� ••' � W " e AR y o 30 12 13 _ 14 'I5 16
4. z 2 A 12 Iso.i LJ i 33 P_ �.� = 0.67At. r �6',_ '� _ `'I
6� a3 lai 1b •25 `tJ 3® •
s II 16 szp -_
ICI-
r I I - 13 .. 10 .85. .3 31 .k . ;' d I FT
ti,
'ISe Q //I.,. b 35 4 60 •r5396
w 1 1r1 ,�a. FBI •PJ Pj3
CO .so `� 10 6' Q P. I.Il6_•
• 9:: 1': r Earl Sm9}h eo '
E' 7 .. l Co en 2.67 Ad. - 61 0.61 Ac. W s 10 a N N.E; 69) 416 -
9Q :\;:
• 4• s 5• I0935 T . .A7 ,67.Cfi 41.5C'
60 120 4 �70.os - , ab4.3�-�'r 'o4D ESMT. `A[. ®Lp N•G 240
.! LAJI
erg ' 1 , a w1dj. ':' 08.85 61.0
r.L.2z /20 :: C.•Willioms 237C:
Llo V. I-ldze.IC..c T1.266 .~'T.L./7C
360 +
I
Weber :y
a •MI
a
T.c.z `
N. W. WEATHERS 'SR. oEj .- i
I
,o/ = • 3o.ez -. .'... . ,-W .:... _�•, _ `cls. ®$gC.•Willisms
•
` N• ® 0;59Ac: 30,:. . IOW' •
140 5N 6 b 80 •
9 13(
WARD.L. WARE- ° 7'L./i- ® �;W� ,4I Lb`$. -
,34.ez , • T.2.214._•-.:: �• loc. IA% A%00NU._ '•. IsuN1r$ .
a ./2s•.'. .I �-•, 61D6 77.19 i•1 77-N! e4 •
`'. I.oi 4._•;A �;'a �; . :g - '. ` E-', ::_ 5T ST. R •269.62 T.L./ •.•- T.L./33,-m .�..;.:f• , _ _-yA
'•',45:54- -- Z L--..n-W�40.. �_. l .'-�;y -•
420. • :i,�. -. , IfPI i 1. HERITAG4 �,_
• - • ^ . _. . - : FOREST ' E
• / / ,T.L./o6.. - W • T2 -.a:.. LA CONDO _1 co -!
• ailla,Millh' !Zt.:": ‘: . - • .• '''.-14) -
_ tam
/e ./4 7: 2°4 "Al, `�3 4 SP 06 9-83; . 4'•'••,'� -• , ° 1 12.89 Ac.
• :, i 343.02 1
k4.04 Ac. . I Pees,PiR.K... 1 .:. '".:W - i J..�44'44 ''Q:4Q AC ® 324.01,, I
7 L.//O a . P. 6I.. P.&-L. Go I - .
� � •�Lc. III
I
,..s. 1
I.03 -sue. sririo,G .: b..._..
W
• r-:-.,
- 6.1T.e.„‘..‘
300 ^' Jc, ... •
i Oavid Jens••• : . en `�'
200 69 O° y
- � - . 0.86'Ac •
RY C. Y: WU (I) $ Z '• - 4.90 AC. 25o Q a
• [. .141 175 75 N y 98 II
as 200.7.5 I co 11140,t
W
o I i • N , .„(0 v- :o
g ��
1�I ...
TL:/9 r, I y o ' �0.3$A
J I • .,.... .. .
� ' N N
c 1 'c m
9A '� ,, o Q Ho
• T.L./°J t- �) E j�t1. •-7 �- s. }o
. . . . ` .> �' a j
b
HI
1l (�-,
. �I ! 0 1 ."I Y W
Q {1
j1 011E3 -0-5 pr h II Q Q p ��
- !1 _ _ ►1 - .. N `'• ,� 1I ,i 071Ac
`'f - t 14di f 142 214.43 �y /,175 7$• 175 ®zs. zs148.Z2-•r ,;..
-.1 0m ter: /(/ i `- - / r .:.<:1i :„;a' J t ^3 '':
• >2 ..---,.-. Al-P-- -dTI-11 c •K- .1 •
= t4:: = :
- _
.
, i •
_ eie. 1 ,,, i vifP ---•* :— ...E 1
.4 p i
g ��` G k
I,� /1 , L - • - -
z I J •
`�€• I o ,,.1
1 :7
I I11* J I c:: I
ii
C,
O
kr.
Y '/�1`: ^? L iy _ , Cif
•
I . ...4:::. I Ilipp, ... ...:NO/ ,
.."...=. AT ,
-.i...?:v ,t444;;;.. , . . !. .tii.:, . 1 p, '-'
.._... gg. 1
, .,, -----,
jt i I ,Nita I. ..loft• _ _ - -
- - -- -- / \ i \-.� \
A
_UNION _AVENUE_ N.E. _ _ _ _ - - --
I '
I,. .. .--•-•\ i.,,. \ / ?' '.., I zI, r
cn
1 r-3.
• .
\ .
, . .
. .... . ._. .
. . . .
•
0—��$ 4 4 0---�.0
r E E 5'a U sis mt CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN own
j b� "� PROPOSED VISION SPECIAL �` g
SINGLE MOTHERS HOME NEEDS HOUSING
co'N 3 RENTON, WASHINGTON (425) 228-6356 El
Y WALLACE
ii
N.E. 5TH STREET o<%Da°
?$ F - - 1207 NORM 33R0 SWUT
s I $ (206)N204-1502
•
I
I J C7
;1 I. ¢Zi
•
0 CO CO
Q I titED
1cAco
SN
3 ZUN
cu
;3 I OpLn
4 sio.a6 ti, PROPERTY LINE 0
r— J. _ I
rT '►�" em 5 Stw ._ SE1&CK
•..1 1 I: ca.n< i ti.. • •• 1 I I
•
;� . r r
;I I On G I I.
si 1 I _ ---� 1 � .� I I LEGEND:
la' L--- m I TOTAL SITE: 34,680 SF
a 1 I 7�r l •
�, iviblirfp, PHASE 1
} V-VLF v�� ��� ✓ `. ` �I I FIRST FLOOR: 2,825 SF $
50.- . J - Iv V I I w SECOND FLOOR: 2,175 SF
I I c" I \ + TOTAL: 5,000 SF
III�It 0.
1---- - /' �`. I I `m°" I ,1 j Z PHASE 2
; 1 >' L _• , � I FIRST FLOOR: 4,600 SF
:}y -- ✓\,� J ; Z I TOTAL:SECOND FLOOR: 4,600 SF
9,200 SF
:j PROPERTY UNE /`
7 t
- -_ _ _ - - i; WI TOTAL FOOT PRINT: 7,425 SF
nu moo / , \ • 011 Q PERCENT COVERAGE: 21%
I - •�ti�� � * 1 PARKING REQUIRED W
:IASTANDARD: 7 m Z
I 41/11111.1 '.. ---- .Y i w. O COMPACT: 5 OED
20'-d r — I I a z ACCESSIBLE: 1 2'O
i --- m. I I I PARKING PROVIDED p co Z
ND MM 1. •1 I STANDARD: 7 W CC S
I CON .m cma J� �L, I L I ACCESSIBLE: 1 W
>i 5 _ j V PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE: NO 4 _
i 1M• v �' i 7 • ALL OTHER LANDSCAPE: 22,000 SF ED O
j I I em �� °i0 lc' E ^ 44� �4, •:I I ALLOW BUILDING HEIGHT: 2 STORY-30' a) Erg
L_ _ {i._ R I PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT: 2 STORY-25'
I 1 , I 1 �j _ ALLOW BUILDING SETBACK _I♦-
.M FRONT: 20' C}Z
I 1 I ° arrt I _ / A% • SIDELJrJs1j.• 1 REAIOSEDBUILDING SETBACK
NT2 w•-d I INDEX:
SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION
•
SITE PLANS I SITE PLAN
•
N' I LI CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN $ScuE t..�_d$
• EI GENERALIZED ELEVATIONS
SCALE' 1 =20-O" •
P1 CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE NEW MTE OT-ths)
FI FLOOR PLANS (PHASE I) °R""" )
F2 FLOOR PLANS (PHASE 11) D e SHOOT rs
I • DI DRAINAGE PLAN
TI TREE INVENTORY PLAN 1 a$
$ $ $
I
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of
the
SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL
600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032
a daily newspaper published seven (7) times a week. Said newspaper is a legal
newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months Le g a I s
prior to the date ofpublication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language project file and the mitigation measures
gimposed by the City of Rer '>
continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County Environmental Review Committee
Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL availableion, ath the Development Se d__,
DETERMINATION Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building,
State of Washington for King County. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-
The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County RENTON,WASHINGTON 2550. Appeal procedures are available in
The Environmental Review Committee the City Clerk's office,First Floor,Municipal
Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- Building.A Public Hearing will be held by
during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Significance - Mitigated for the following the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regu-
project under the authority of the Renton lar meeting in the Council Chambers on
Municipal Code. the second floor of City Hall, Renton,
Notice of Public Hearing - File#LUA-97-094, ECF, CU, H VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING Washington,on September 9, 1997 at 9:00
LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H AM to consider the proposed Conditional
Envias published on: 8/18/97 development offal groupew for home consisting ng of d Use Permit. If the Environmental
P9 P 9 Determination is appealed,the appeal will
two structures.South of NE 5th Street,and be heard as part of this public hearing.
The full amount of the fee charged for said for oing publication is the sum of$56.15 West of Union Avenue NE. Interested parties are invited to attend the
Legal Number 3495 The 15 day comment and appeal period public hearing.
for this project will run concurrently. The Published in the South County Journal
comment/appeal periods for this project will August 18,1997.3495
end at 5:00 PM on September 01, 1997.
Written comments shall be forwarded to
the Development Services Division Land
L al lark, South aunty Journal Use Review Supervisor. Information on the
/ /Subscribed and sworn before me on this AZday of G t, 19 li
•
�,�E"..".'..FFy Notary Public of the State of Washington
�,.••Nr �, residing in Renton
:mac ''r=u' King County, Washington
,.J��\�
Lr
AUG-14-97 04 :57 AM P. 01
is
•
CITY OF RE7% TON
AUG •i 2
���r'v 11 Y'�.4 vI V1997ISION
Facsimile Cover Sheet
To: Kayren Kittrick
Company: City of Renton
Phone: 277-4499
Fax: 277-4455
From: Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E.
Company: Civil Engineer
Phone: (206) 242-7665
Fax: Same - call first.
Date: 08/13/97
Pages including this
cover page: 7
Comments: Kayren - This is very basic, but should meet the
inaccuracy needed for a preliminary plan. Thanks.
Bruce
AUG-14-97 04 :58 AM P . 02
•
• Brute S. MacVeigh, P.E.
Civil Engineer
14245 59th Avenue South •
Tukwila,WA 98168
Office: (206)242-7665 FAX: Same-call first.
-_ 13 August, 1997
Subject: Drainage Report, Vision Special Needs Housing,6-Unit Complex, Union
Avenue N.E., Renton, WA
The site is located on the west side of Union Avenue N.E. Surrounding uses are single
family, multi-family and light commercial. The total area of the site is 34,545 SF or 0.79
acres. The site will have upon completion two multi-family buildings and an eight car
parking lot with access drive. The site will have surrounding lawn with landscaping.
The existing cover is heavy brush,with a topography of generally flat,with a depression
of one to three feet in the central portion of the site. Union Avenue N.E. fronts the site
along its east side and has curb, gutter and underground drainage system. The concept
for the site's drainage system is to collect runoff from all impervious areas, treat runoff
from vehicular traffic areas,and detain and release all runoff to the public system. A pre-
developed 100-year storm release rate will be used, as prescribed in the King County
manual.
Based on a preliminary review of the neighborhood topography,relatively little runoff
enters or leaves the site at present. For conceptual purposes,this will be assumed to be
the case for this preliminary report.
Based on attached calculations, the pre-development 100-year storm runoff is 0.35 CFS.
Assuming a detention pond with 3:1 sideslopes and a live depth of 1.5 feet,a volume of
695 CF is required, giving a pond with an area at 1.5 foot depth of 600 SF, per attached
calculations.
Final design calculations will provide a more complex analysis of the proposed system.
Questions relating to this matter may be referred to this office.
ffra„,
S. Mack
Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. . �G of WASi4,�r
•
Civil Engineer
44+
"10070G
EXPIRES: 4/24/ /
AUG-14-97 04 :59 AM -. P. 03
Vision Special Needs Housing
Union Avenue NE, Renton, WA
Total Site Area=34,545 SF
Total Existing Impervious Surface =0 SF
New Building Area= 7,685 SF approx.
New Driveways and Parking Area=3,800 SF aprox.
New Sidewalk Area= 1,500 SF aprox.
Total New Impervious Area= 12,985 SF approx.
Storm Development Fee= 12,985 Sf @$0.129/SF=$1,675.07
AUG-14-97 04 :59 AM P. 04
I I
Tel/"7//v.Uf 1),eAli--64,4"E (/4!. eve 7ioi s
1//5 i t / e-r i)S f�vs/�.•�
S 10( Pi': A/ 1 ..r'7-Orr- 1.444i
, 7 ? / c.
Pi?E'- -7 C
la V!VI A o ( 4 // ) 3, q
WI"
W W W
Mee
******************** S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION ********************
********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.90" TOTAL PRECIP. *********
ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1
.79 86 0 0 30
DATA PRINT-OUT:
AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES)
A CN A CN
.8 .8 86.0 .0 .0 30.0
PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT)
.35 7.83 6998
I , A!/G4.?AG C r 771,5' - f[ is z. PA 7 - = 0,, 35. F S,
Pc, AJY,t)„9C 6-i, C = /0
AR e/9 r. 3 o A
PcP fA D , 45Ac
******************** S.C.S. TYPE-1A DISTRIBUTION ********************
********* 100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.90" TOTAL PRECIP. *********
ENTER: A(PERV) , CN(PERV) , A(IMPERV) , CN(IMPERV) , TC FOR BASIN NO. 1
.49 90 .3 98 10
DATA PRINT-OUT;
AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES)
A CN A CN
.8 .5 90.0 .3 98.0 10.0
PEAK-O(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT)
AUG-14-97 05 :00 AM - P. 05
/ Cis Aide) / 'c— .
/ O S' /z "
1�F /, S` I
ENTER: NUMBER OF ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft) , RISER-DIAMETER(in)
1
1.5
12
RISER OVERFLOW DEPTH FOR PRIMARY PEAK INFLOW = .16 FT
SPECIFY: R - REVIEW/REVISE INPUT, C - CONTINUE
C
INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 2901 CU-FT
SINGLE ORIFICE RESTRICTOR: DIA= 3.25"
PERFORMANCE: INFLOW TARGET-OUTFLOW ACTUAL-OUTFLOW PK-STAGE STORAGE
DESIGN HYD: .63 .35 .35 1.50 695
TEST HYD 1: .63 .35 .35 1.50 690
45,4 s o.Y yy/s Pa,
,41y A/P ~/) f /Z' v .o?zy ) o f- /9 PPh? k .
A , 4 Marx 3v '
AUG-'14-97 05 :01 AM P• 06
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
TABLE 3.5.2B SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS
SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SOS in 1982)
Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural, suburban and urban land use for Type IA
rainfall distribution, 24-hour storm duration.
CURVE,NUMBERS BY
HYDROLOGIC SOIL G P
LAND USE DESCRIPTION A B C R D
Cultivated land(1): winter condition 86 91 94 95
Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92
Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89
Wood or forest land: undisturbed 42 64 76 tiWood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 72 81Orchard: with cover crop 81 88 92
Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses,cemeteries,
landscaping.
good condition: grass cover on 75% �—
or more of the area 68 80 86
fair condition: grass cover on 50%
to 75%of the area 77 85 90 92 :..�
Gravel roads and parking lots 76 85 89 91
Dirt roads and parking lots 72 82 87 89
Impervious surfaces, pavement, roofs, etc. 98 98 98 0
Open water bodies: lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100
Single Family Residential (2)
Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3)
1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number
1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected
2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and
2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious portion
3.0 DU/GA 34 of the site or basin
3.5 DU/GA 38
4.0 DU/GA 42
4.5 DU/GA 46
5.0 DU/GA 48 .
5.5 DU/GA 50
6.0 DU/GA 52
6.5 DU/GA 54
7.0 DU/GA 56
Planned unit developments, % Impervious
condominiums, apartments, must be computed
commercial business and
industrial areas.
(1) For a more detailed description of agricultural!and use curve numbers refer to National Engineering
Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972.
(2) Assumes roof and driveway runoff Is directed into street/storm system.
(3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers.
AUG-14-97 05 :02 AM P- 07
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
FIGURE 3.5.1H 100-YEAR 24-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS •'-'-1
•
I 3./t Sell OA' „,,,,,,e, , , .._, , , ,:. I
p il 4...*:70,41.....-v- ,1:,, .,,,,__AR, , %.
a.
4 i/ 1611$140VAPN 411Wallittlitli 1 ,
// Ift-011ticir Villika 113V
ak I MigitirdAM *101 11- tilet L47"-N
acY.9 .. '7ttigiiN.PratiVilitill I ilw''''1 t 4L40.4
4.7 . Nz*4?:441:aelgic Pl"'1110 \ s•..,
, -,:,\,„.,,,,ii$Ar ogifoiL
‘ , fo /
tiilal
43 , �. �_ "'"��;...,�IL►. .wRl�'.�►,lio
� it I
4,q. i , `:sir r �!�L� ��i�',in ��1r/�� �O• ,
,ipe.0000... _ -.•• .046
,I 4 .- L; ICI, Tli* j illt a�`i'► 4t ft
II
% 1i i Ii,k l
o„P.s,,,,P
ti4k -4.,„...-maimroppoi -A
/ TAI'll .., ,m.),.., ciei ..elimmir
46 . ,.- •A „JINN 6 --/.00.01, A P. (IN" '-‘411,54Viiiiii --
I - .." tat ilc vi.i;, 44egithi)1114' 'FIF -\ .:_*74,:.,Tr ''- ‘,
i tfp .
/ 1,- mil I 4, , ,e,i',. ,
/ i 1iir a i,K.I.Apie.ii... 721kAt. salk*glkit ippir
• IA . . tirikpil 4111p0WV., -OF Ilk „jet li .-- _ — , \ ...
Mil ts--- - iwit .s4,4gillivit Q=4„\,"‘Np 1 ,- 1 =1,
, j frit '...e... - Ili, ;fill 'IL 11 um ti -- 1.I\ itrA41 .
/ I ciPills.. leilicellifillipakobotk,„1111
r.,-,‘ kfigille � ���r... �-; �=.fir `��
W* tW
rek 11 i I"I 1 I NIRO
._._., __� / Is; irr�.,.. ��= ,ram Ik.104*Ir
. ,
�' lrA r J//lfuarlR � / i r
• titVitO it 1 11'74116-Vp.PIAM!. ) -
•gib iv , i ;oft ,. ... 71,,,,,ekitiri .0 Ar ,
-)...4
- 1 /-,- A .v. _ Ntwirfre,if v lir - , •‘..
, ,
tiP - ---- - ---- ---- VFAIN Ali
O near. .; '_.
O`' eye •4741 FA TAMPI . ..: _
100-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION 4 liZWAI RWi�i1limii 6.5 M
fv
i 3.4 ---iSOPLUVIALS OF 100-YEAR 24-HOUR telt �� 4/41114iiiiNut ¢A
TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES 0��4:--iralliAlir„. 5.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 NM -
CITY OF RENTON
CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
On the 5 : day of Sep Mber" , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United
States, a sealed envelope contaihing
RePor� ttearlt%5 EX1LVA hV%e '
documents. This information was sent to:
Name Representing
ShswvN W oar��v%
(Signature of Sender) a0. K• ttr'
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence thatb,P4 K- SCE / signed this
instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument.
Dated: CJ 6—/`/ ') `(6�
Notary Pub!' in and f r the State of Washingto ‘
ARGARET 4.i.RULtAR
Notary (Print) COMMISSION EX(11e. /91�
My appointment expires: �c
Project Name: •
V1SI8In Siberclak Deeds kiC1ASN*‘O
Project Number: WPt. 91 „094. CU-t1 , Et-1
NOTARY.DOC
CITY )F RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
September 5, 1997
Ms. Susan Camerer
Vision Special Needs Housing
PO Box 2951
Renton, WA 98056
SUBJECT: Vision Special Needs Housing
LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
Dear Ms. Camerer:
This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental
Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced
project.
No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation
Measures and Conditions of approval.
As you know, a Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the
Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on September 9, 1997 at 9:00
AM to consider the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The applicant or representative(s) of the
applicant is required to be present at the public hearing.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-6186.
For the Environmental Review Committee,
Ud\ k,e/vv
nifer oth Henning
Project Manager
FINAL.DOC
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055
This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%post consumer
11- O' 4,GU-H
" r. CIT' _ 3F RENTON
LL 7 Planning/Building/Public Works Department.
Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P E.,Administrator
August-21, 1997. •
RECEIVEr)
AUG 2 6 '97 . ,
OFFICE •!F f n..
Superintendent's Office SUPERINTENDENT
Renton School District#403 •
435 Main Avenue South ,
Renton, WA 98055
The City of Renton Development Services Division has received,an application for a 6-unit Group Home
to be located on a vacant approximate 0.80 acre parcel that is zoned R-10 (Residential s 10 dwelling
units per acre). The property,is located on the west side of Union Avenue NE, south of NE 5th Street.
Up to two female heads of household and their children would live in each unit of the Group Home,which
' would serve as transitional housing for the families for up to two years. A total of 12 - 18 families
(homeless mother and children)would be housed within the project.
In order to process this application, the Development Services Division needs to know which Renton
,schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Would you
please fill in the appropriate schools on the list below and return this letter to the Development Services
Division;City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055. •
I
Elementary School: Highlands
Middle School: McKnight. ' •
High School: Hazen
Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to
come from the proposed development? Yes - X No..
Any Comments:
o
Thank you for providing this important information.
Sincerely; . ,
. i( .
Jennifer Toth Henning ,
Project Manager „
schcolljth/ac ' • 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 - .
' This naoer contains 50%recycled material.20%nost consumer. •
I �
•
L<.N IG.D V ION`'::>` '<<€ `< `>'<> >`> `< gm.<> »ii. `: _> �`ENTONMEEMBENMEMBEEEtinitieffiglegiaga
<' C INT a► S
•
On the alCd day of Se a Mier" • , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United
States, a sealed envelope containing
documents. This information was sent to: •
•
Name Representing
iBencvtce. Mc nti 1
I •
•
arl av0. Scle0der1' •
•
It►Y# ubr Swaansovl
grav‘kei stbwc •
tlavid •
•
klei,etr
•
•
•
•
(Signature of Sender) .3Jmiho.. e,de"
•
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS
• COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ,SAndKt4 k- ee e/z- signed this
instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fore uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument.
1.142.4 3, c' ( J
• Notary Publi and fort
e State of ington
' + - Notary(Print) MARILYN KAMCHEFF
!, :. , •`. ►• My appointment expires:
- .. ES 6129V139
a e• Vtswn Special Aceds ttoustat
P •
roj •ect lumber:' ILA -91 - 094 cU-W o GGp
.NOTARY.DOC
..... .. ................. ..............................:..:..:.:.:.::.....
:::: . . .. . . :. :
.......................................................................
... ::..>:.....:... catrroti s `liste are i .order.o ..a ication n ►m er..onl ..and rio#..nec . sa �. ..#h.e..a d:.:r::ir :which::
PROJECT NAME: VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to develop a Group Home II consisting of two
structures, each located on a separate lot. A 5,000 square foot two-story duplex would be developed
during Phase 1, and a 9,200 square foot 2-story fourplex would be constructed as part of Phase 2.
Buildings would be approximately 25 feet in height. Access would be from Union Avenue NE. Shared
parking for 8 vehicles would be provided in a lot constructed on the south parcel. A parking modification
request has been applied for to provide five fewer spaces than the Code requires. A private playground
would be installed between the two structures for use by the residents. Location: South of NE 5th Street,
and West of Union Avenue NE.
•
AGNDA.DOC
1'• 1
City of Renton
PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
Public Hearing Date: September 9, 1997
Project Name: Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home
•
Applicant/ Susan Camerer(Vision Special Needs Housing)
Address: PO Box 2951
Renton, WA 98056
Owner/ Stanley Stone Arthur Swanson Barbara Schellert
Address: 401 Park Place, Suite 220 4512 Talbot Road South 3506 Park Ave North
Kirkland, WA 98033 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056
Beatrice McNeil
517 Union Ave North
Renton, WA 98059
File Number: LUA-097-094, CU-H, ECF- Project Manager:
Jennifer Toth Henning
Project•
' Descri Description:P The applicant seeks approval from the City of Renton to develop a Group Home
consisting of two structures, a 5,000 square foot two-unit structure, and a 9,200
square foot four-unit building. Each structure would be built on its own parcel, with
the two-unit building developed on the north parcel during Phase 1, and the four-unit
structure built on the south parcel in Phase 2.
The buildings would be two-stories and 25 feet in height. The project would include
shared parking for eight vehicles, a common playground area located between the
two parcels, and several common garden/yard areas. An orchard, lawn, and garden
area are proposed on the site.
Since the project could accommodate up to 10 persons per unit, a Conditional Use
Permit is being sought to exceed the maximum number of six unrelated individuals
occupying a Group Home II.
Project Location: South of NE_ 5th Street and Union Avenue NE• ______
rr yy•o .�� CI.C.� °Y.�; D n•O14` _.Nu �G :
. aa,il■ W u• T-+S'J• L ►-C.° o ° •` X[.:ei 'Pf'
�� .:�� !'=� � .r2:� ,� �;;,'o'�1�..
•
I " 7""Ifia
® I kar ,K , e N
City of Renton P/B/PW Departmem_ - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 Page 2 of 12
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner of Record:: Stanley Stone, Arthur Swanson, Barbara Schellert, Beatrice McNeil
2. Zoning Designation: Residential-10 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-10)
3. Comprehensive Plan Residential Options (RO)
:Land Use Designation
4. Existing Site Use: Vacant
5. Neighborhood Characteristics:
North: Single Family Residential Neighborhood
East: Single Family Residential Neighborhoods
South: Commercial district-- NE 4th Street corridor
West: Single Family Residential Neighborhoods
6 Access: via Union Avenue NE
7. Site Area: 0.79 acres
8. Project Data: area comments
Existing Building Area: N/A
New Building Area: 14,200 sq. ft. in two structures
Total Building Area: 14,200 sq. ft.
C. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND:
Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date
Annexation N/A 1480 4/20/54
Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 2/20/95
Zoning Code N/A 4404 6/7/93
D. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Utilities:
Water: Existing 12-inch diameter water main in Union Avenue NE;
two fire hydrants near site-- one at the intersection of NE 5th
Street and Union Avenue NE, and one to the south of the
project site. A City of Seattle 36-inch diameter water line also
existing in an easement/right-of-way that Union Ave. NE is
built over.
Sewer: Existing 8-inch diameter sewer line located at the southeast
corner of Union Avenue NE and NE 5th Street
HEx2.DOC
City of Renton PB/PW Departme:. - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 Page 3 of 12
Surface Water/Storm Water: Existing 24-inch storm line in Union Avenue NE
2. Fire Protection: provided per City of Renton
3. Transit: Metro Transit Routes 908/909 and 114 travel on Union, and
connect to the 111 route on the NE 3rd/NE 4th Street
corridor.
4. Schools: Honeydew Elementary, Hazen High School, Highlands
Elementary, McKnight Middle School, Renton Technical
College
5. Recreation: Kiwanis Park within approximately five blocks
6 Other: Project site is located within Aquifer Protection Area Zone 2
E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE:
1. Section 4-9: Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance
2. Section 4-14: Parking and Loading Ordinance
3. Section 4-31-6: Residential 10/Units per Acre (R-10) Zone
4. Section 4-31-36: Conditional Use Permit
F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
1. Section 1: Land Use Element-- Residential Options Policies
2. Section 3: Housing Element-- Special Populations Policies
G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND
The applicant seeks approval from the City of Renton to develop a Group Home consisting of
two structures, a 5,000 square foot two-unit structure, and a 9,200 square foot four-unit building.
Each structure would be built on its own parcel, with the two-unit structure developed on the
north parcel during Phase 1, and the four-unit building constructed on the south parcel in Phase
2. The Group Home would serve as transitional housing for homeless single mothers (making
less than 30% of the median income) and their children. Each single mother and her children
would share kitchen, dining and living areas of the dwelling unit with another single mother and
her children. Since the project could accommodate up to 10 persons per unit, a Conditional Use
Permit is being sought to exceed the maximum number of six unrelated individuals occupying a
Group Home.
The buildings would be two-stories and 25 feet in height. The project would include shared
parking for eight vehicles, a common playground area located between the two parcels, and
several common garden/yard areas. An orchard, lawn, and garden area are proposed on the
site. Six of the 11 existing Douglas fir trees located on the north lot would be retained as part of
HEX2.DOC
•
City of Renton P/B/PW Departmer.. Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 Page 4 of 12
the site landscaping. Existing understory vegetation and five existing trees would be cleared as
part of the proposal.
For the six-unit group home project, a total of 8 parking spaces, or 1.33 parking spaces per unit,
are proposed. Since the Parking and Loading Ordinance has been interpreted to require 13
parking spaces, a modification has been requested from the City's Parking and Loading
Ordinance. A decision is pending for this request. •
Approximately 2,500 cubic yards of fill material would be imported to the site during construction
of the project. A 600 square foot stormwater detention pond would be constructed adjacent to
Union Avenue NE, on the northeast portion of the site.
2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as
amended), on August 12, 1997 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of
Non-Significance- Mitigated.
3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES
1. The applicant shall install and maintain Temporary Erosion Control to the satisfaction of
the representative of the Development Services Division(inspector/engineer)prior to the
commencement, and for the duration of the project.
Compliance: The applicant shall be required to submit a Temporary Erosion Control
Plan and Temporary Stormwater Control Plan prior to issuance of any construction or
building permits for the project.
2. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$488.00 for the duplex building and
$388.00 per unit for each of the four units in the fourplex. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due
prior to the issuance of the building permits.
Compliance: The applicant will be required to pay the Fire Mitigation Fee prior to the
issuance of any building permits for the site.
3. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per average daily trip.
The fee per building is$300 for the duplex, and$600 for the fourplex payable with the
building permits. This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits.
Compliance: The applicant shall be required to pay the Transportation Mitigation Fee
prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project.
4. The applicant shall submit the Parks Mitigation Fee of$354.51 per unit(6 units x$354.51
=$2,127.06)prior to the issuance of building permits.
Compliance: The applicant shall be required to pay the Parks Mitigation Fee prior to
the issuance of any building permits for the project.
5. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through
Friday, and Saturday as arranged with the Development Services Division, but no hours
in excess of weekday hours, and no site construction/utilities installation on Sunday(e.g.,
operation of heavy equipment).
HEX2.DOC
•
City of Renton P/B/PW Departmen. Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 Page 5 of 12
Compliance: The applicant has stated that volunteer labor will be the primary means of
constructing the proposed project. The applicant has inquired as to the possibility of
extending the hours, particularly on weekends. As of the time of preparation of this
report, no appeal had been filed with the regard to construction hours.
4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to
identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are
contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the
appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the
report.
5 CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA
Section 4-31-36 lists 11 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider, along with all
other relevant information, in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include
the following:
(5A) CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMP. PLAN, ZONING CODE& OTHER ORDINANCES:
The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and
standard of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program,
map or ordinance of the City of Renton.
(1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT
The project site is designated Residential Options (RO) on the Land Use Element Map of
the Comprehensive Plan. These areas are intended to be new planned residential
neighborhoods which include a variety of unit types designed to incorporate features
from both single family and multi-family developments, and to support cost efficient
housing, infill development, transit service, and the efficient use of urban services and
infrastructure.
The proposal is consistent with goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan as listed
below in that it would increase the number and type of housing opportunities in the
community, would be compatible with existing neighborhood development; would allow
residents to walk to services, school, recreation, and work opportunities; and would
increase the amount of special needs housing in Renton.
Land Use Element Goal 2a: contribute to a strong sense of community and
neighborhood identity;
Goal 2b: are walkable places where people can: shop, play and get to work without
always having to drive;
Goal 2c: are developed at densities sufficient to support public transportation and make
efficient use of urban services and infrastructure;
Goal 2d: offer a variety of housing types for a population diverse in age, income and
lifestyle;
Goal 2e: are varied or unique in character;
Goal 2g: are visually attractive, safe, and healthy environments in which to live;
Goal 2h: offer connection to the community instead of isolations; and
HEX2.DOC
City of Renton P/B/PW Departmen. Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 Page 6 of 12
Goal 21: provide a sense of home.
Objective LU-K: Create new planned residential neighborhoods in areas mapped as
Residential Options (RO) and Residential Planned Neighborhood (RPN) which include a
variety of unit types designed to incorporate features from both single family and multi-
family developments, and to support cost efficient housing, infill development, transit
service, and the efficient use of urban services and infrastructure.
Policy LU-41: Provision of small lot single family detached unit types, townhouses and
small scale multi-family structures should be encouraged provided that density standards
can be met.
Policy LU-46: Specific design standards should be developed for residential structures
and building clusters based on the following criteria:
a) heights, width and length of structures should be designed to resemble single family
housing,with similar setbacks from the street as single family'
b) parking should be located on lots to ensure adequate light and air, and views if any,
are preserved between lots;
c) structures should be located on lots to ensure adequate light and air, and views if
any, are preserved between lots;
d) buildings should be massed in a manner that promotes a pedestrian scale with a
small neighborhood feeling;
e) units and entrances of each dwelling unit should be individually distinctive and front
on streets rather than courtyards and parking lots.
f) fences may be constructed if they contribute to an open spacious feeling between
units and structures; and
g) streetscapes should include green, open space for each unit.
Policy LU-51: Detached single family housing, attached townhouses, duplexes,
triplexes, and fourplexes should be allowed in Residential Options.
Policy LU-53: Development in Residential Options should be compatible with existing
development patterns and be sensitive to unique features and differences among
established neighborhoods. Development standards should reflect single family
neighborhood characteristics such as ground related orientation, coordinated structural
design, and private yards.
Objective H-H: Increase the supply of Special Needs Housing.
Policy H-61: Support social service organizations including the Housing Authority, which
provide housing for special needs populations.
Policy H-62: Support establishment and operation of emergency shelters.
Policy H-64: Consider how a proposed site for special needs housing meets the needs
of prospective residents, promotes diversity in neighborhoods and integrates assisted
housing within the community. The following goals are desired:
1. Offers a high level of access to shopping, services, and other facilities needed by the
residents.
2. Provide service by public transportation or the development provides another means
to meet the transportation needs or residents.
3. Provide an opportunity to diversify a neighborhood economically, ethnically/racially,
or with persons with disabilities.
4. Helps to preserve low-income and special needs housing opportunities in a
neighborhood where those opportunities are being lost.
HEX2.DOC
City of Renton P/B/PW Deparfinen%_ Preliminary Report to the Hewing Examiner
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 Page 7 of 12
(2) ZONING CODE
'The project site is zoned Residential-10 Dwelling Units/Acre (R-10). The purpose of the
R-10 Zone is to provide a mix of residential styles including single family detached
dwellings, single family attached, duplex, tri-plex, and fourplex dwellings. It is designed
to encourage residential areas with better use of common and private open space,
greater privacy and more energy and resource efficient homes. The intent of the R-10
Zone is two-fold: 1) to create new residential neighborhoods on large parcels of land,
and, 2) to create high quality infill development that increases density while maintaining
energy and resource efficient homes. The intent of the R-10 Zone is two-fold: 1) to
create new residential neighborhoods on large parcels of land, and, 2) to create high
quality infill development that increases density while maintaining the single family
character of the existing neighborhood.
Group Home II (Protective Residence)with a maximum of 6 residents are permitted as a
primary use in the R-10 Zone. Group Home II for seven or more residents are permitted
with a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit.
The proposal for a Group Home II with a maximum of 10 residents per unit is permitted
with a Conditional Use Permit.
(3) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
(a) Number of Residential Structures Per Lot: Only one residential building with a
maximum of four residential units and associated accessory structures for that building
are permitted on a legal lot. The proposal is for two residential buildings, a two-unit and
a four-unit building, each on their own legal lot.
(b) Dwelling Unit Mix: Parcels greater than 0.5 acre must achieve a specific
residential mix. The proposal is for two parcels, each less than 0.5 acres in size,
therefore, the requirement for a mix of detached, semi-attached and attached units is not
required.
(c) Lot Area: Minimum lot area in the R-10 Zone is determined by the type of
dwellings being developed. For a duplex, the minimum lot areas is 5,000 square feet.
For a four-plex, the minimum lot area is 10,000 square feet. During Phase 1, the four-
unit building on the north parcel would be developed on a parcel that is 17,191 square
feet in size. Phase 2 development of a two-unit structure would occur on a parcel that is
17,354 square feet in size.
(d) Lot Width/Depth: The proposal meets the minimum lot width of 50 feet, in the
that the parcels are each 81+ feet in width. A minimum depth of 65 feet is required, and
each of the lots are 210 to 213 feet in depth.
(e) Setbacks: Minimum required setbacks are 20 feet for the front yard, 20 feet for
the rear yard, and 10 feet for the unattached sideyard on attached structures. The
proposal complies in that the four-unit building would be setback about 48 feet from the
front property line, and the two-unit structure would be setback approximately 78 feet
from the front property line. The structures would be setback at least 25 feet from the
rear property line, and minimum 10 foot sideyard setback is being maintained for both
structures. Projections of eaves into the sideyard setback are permitted provided that
the projection is not greater than 24 inches. Both structures would have eaves that
project 24 inches into the side yard setback.
(f) Height: The proposed structures would be two-stories and a maximum of 25 feet
in height. The R-10 Zone permits two-story structures up to 30 feet in height.
HEX2.DOC
City of Renton P/B/PW Departmer..-- Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 Page 8 of 12
(g) Lot Coverage: The R-10 Zone permits lot coverage up to 50% of the total lot
area. The proposal would result in lot coverage of 16% for Phase 1 (two-unit structure)
and 26%for Phase 2 (four-unit building).
(h) Refuse and Recyclable Collection & Storage: The garbage and recycling
receptacles would be located on the southern lot abutting the east facade of the two-unit
structure and adjacent to the proposed parking area. Access would be readily available
from Union Avenue NE for garbage and recycling trucks. A pathway from the four-unit
building on the north lot would provide access from the north.
(4) PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS:
The Parking and Loading Ordinance does not specifically address Group Homes, but
does require two parking spaces per unit for each single family dwelling, and also for
each two-family dwelling. Multi-family dwellings require 1.5 parking spaces per unit, plus
one guest parking space for every four units in developments with more than five units.
For the six-unit group home (two-unit structure and four-unit building),the Code would be
interpreted to require 1.75 parking spaces per unit, or a total of 12 parking spaces for the
residents. Since the Visions Special Needs Housing proposal also includes 200 square
feet devoted to office use, an additional parking space would be required for the office
use. Therefore, a total of 13 parking spaces would be required under strict interpretation
of the Code.
The applicant has requested a modification from the requirements of the Parking and
Loading Ordinance. Staff has prepared a report and recommendation to the City's
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator recommending approval of the request. A
response is forthcoming and the status of the request will be reported on as part of the
public hearing.
(58) COMMUNITY NEED:
There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the
determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors,
among all other relevant information:
(a) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration
of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed
use.
There is not another single mother's home in the immediate vicinity of the proposal.
Other subsidized housing that has been approved in the downtown area (Burnett Avenue
Family Housing) and elsewhere in the Renton Highlands (Jefferson Avenue Family
Housing). The applicant has provided statistics to document the need for this type of
housing facility. In terms of need in this community, Visions figures indicate that 63% of
the residents in other Vision Special Needs Housing "transitional" housing projects have
Renton mailing addresses, and 88% of the residents come from south King County.
(2) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use.
The proposal is appropriately zoned and meets the intent of the land use and housing
policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The neighborhood is typically residential, while
being in close proximity to shopping, services, schools, recreation, and bus
transportation. Since the residents of this facility would be transitioning to a more stable
lifestyle, they would be likely to utilize the daycare, shopping, and Technical College, all
within walking distance. The ability to walk to the Technical College, shopping, and
daycare is of particular importance, given that only one-third of the adult residents would
likely own automobiles.
HEX2.DOC
City of Renton P/B/PW Departmen Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 Page 9 of 12
The applicant has provided a site plan illustrating the landscaping, open areas, common
spaces, gardens, play areas, and other shared facilities that would serve as focal points
within the development. The buildings would be oriented to reduce the impression of
building bulk when viewed from Union Avenue NE and the two-story 25-foot height
would help to blend into the neighborhood with the existing single family and multi-family
structures.
(5C) EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES:
The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse
effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required:
(1) Lot Coverage: Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of zone in which
the proposed use is to be located.
Lot coverage is limited to 50% in the R-10 Zone. Phase 1 development would result in
16% lot coverage, while Phase 2 would achieve 26% lot coverage. The average lot
coverage for both parcels would be 21%.
(2) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the
proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in
any required yard.
The proposal meets the prescribed setback requirements for front, rear, and sideyard
areas. Roof eaves would project 24 inches into the sideyard, as permitted under the R-
10 Zone.
(3) Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the
zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility
antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of
a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to
allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from
adjacent structures.
The building heights would meet the height limits of the R-10 Zone which allow two
stories or 30 feet height. The proposal would result in structures that are two stories and
a maximum height of 25 feet.
(5D) COMPATIBILITY:
The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the
neighborhood. (Ord 3599, 1-11-82)
Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-46 provides specific design standards addressing the height,
width, and length of the residential structures; location of the buildings on the lot for adequate
light and air; location of parking; design of dwelling unit entrances, and landscaping. The
proposal meets the intent of Policy LU-46 in the height, width, and location of structures on the
lot, as well as the location of parking, and the landscape design proposed.
The east/west orientation of the proposed structures would effectively reduce the impression of
bulk as viewed from the west and east. Union Avenue NE is a primary travel corridor in this
neighborhood, and the only public views would be from Union. The R-10 Zone permits
structures that are attached and detached, and of the type proposed. Traditional single family
residential character is reflected in the pitched roofs proposed for the structures. Proposed
landscaping would be residential in scale and character. The parking area would be set back
from the street also strengthen compatibility within the neighborhood.
HEX2.DOC
City of Renton P/B/PW Depa►tmen_ - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 Page 10 of 12
Staff will recommend as a condition of approval that the applicant be required to construct a
fence around the north, south, and west perimeter of the project site in order to provide a
separation from surrounding development.
(5E) PARKING:
Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to
as much as seventy-five percent(75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the
proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. (Ord.
3903, 4-22-85)
As previously mentioned, the proposal is providing 8 parking spaces, rather than the 13 required
under strict interpretation of the Code. A modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance
has been applied for by the applicant. This request is in process, and staff will report on the
status of the request during the public hearing.
Proposed parking would be provided in a common parking lot, available to residents in either
structure, and to staff working at the site during daytime hours.
(5F) TRAFFIC:
Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and
surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the
surrounding area.
Vehicles will enter and exit the site from Union Avenue NE. The parking area will be set back
from the street approximately 40 feet. The driveway would not hinder pedestrian movement
along the sidewalk any more than a driveway for a single family home. Landscaping treatment
bordering the driveway at its intersection with Union would need to be modified so that trees or
other plantings do not interfere with the sight lines of drivers, bicyclists or pedestrians entering,
exiting or traveling on Union Avenue NE. Staff will recommend that the applicant revise the
landscape plan to provide appropriate ornamental landscape materials in the clear vision area,
where the driveway intersects Union Avenue NE.
(5G) NOISE, GLARE:
Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed
use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse
storage areas.
The common areas which would be expected to generate noise include the parking area, trash
receptacle area, and play area. The parking and trash/recycling area are located on the east
side of the project, adjacent to Union Avenue NE, and the play area is proposed to be located in
the center of the site between the two structures. Noise impacts would not be expected to be
occur off-site, beyond those of a traditional housing development. In addition, residents would
be subject to a curfew that would limit guests to the hours of 9:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. Staff will
recommend as a condition of approval that the applicant be required to install a fence on the
north, south and west perimeter of the site, in order to diminish noise and spillover light impacts.
Security lighting has been encouraged by the Police Department for the common areas and staff
will recommend that this lighting be designed to avoid spillover light impacts.
(5H) LANDSCAPING:
Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing
Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially
adverse effects of the proposed use.
HEX2.DOC
• City of Renton P/B/PW Department• - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 Page 11 of 12
Sufficient and diverse native and ornamental landscaping has been proposed including the
retention of five existing large Douglas fir trees, an orchard, garden areas, perennial beds, and
lawn areas. Proposed landscaped areas account for 22,000 square feet (approximately one-half
acre) of the overall two-lot site. If the applicant's request for a modification from the Parking and
Loading Ordinance is denied, the applicant would need to revise the site plan and eliminate
landscaped areas in order to accommodate additional parking.
(5/) ACCESSORY USES:
Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport
activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a
similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of
the use district in which they are located.
Not Applicable
(5J) CONVERSION:
No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or
structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter.
Not Applicable
(5K) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS:
The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden
on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit
may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public
improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services.
Staff have indicated that adequate public improvements and services exist to accommodate the
proposal. No undue burden on public facilities, utilities and services would be anticipated to
occur as a result of the project.
H. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home, Project File No. LUA-97-
094, CU-H, ECF subject to the following conditions:
(1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the
Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold
Determination prior to the issuance of a building permit.
(2) Revisions to Site Landscape Plan: The applicant shall be required to revise the site
landscape plan to retain a clear vision area (defined as the area bounded by the street property
lines and the driveway, 20 feet from the point of intersection). The landscape plan shall be
submitted to and approved by the Development Services Division staff project manager prior to
the issuance of any construction/building permits.
(3) Provision of a Screening Fence: The applicant shall be required to revise the site plan to
include a 6-foot high wood fence or equivalent screening along the north, south and west
property lines in order to screen the project from abutting properties. The design of the fence
shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division staff project
manager, and must be accomplished prior to the issuance of any construction/building permits.
(4) Provision of Parking OR Approval of Parking Modification Request: The applicant shall be
required to revise the site plan to provide the minimum number of 13 parking spaces, or,
HEX2.DOC
• City of Renton P/B/PW Departmen_ Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
SEPTEMBER 9, 1997 Page 12 of 12
successfully obtain a parking modification from the Planning/Building/Public Works
Administrator. If the parking modification is not approved,the applicant would need to submit
the revised site plan to the Development Services Division staff project manager prior to the
issuance of any construction/building permits.
(5) Provision of a Site Lighting Plan: The applicant shall be required to submit a site lighting plan
which demonstrates that adequate security lighting is provided that is focused and directed so as
to avoid off-site light spillover. The lighting plan shall be submitted to the Development Services
Division staff project manager and approved prior to the issuance of any construction/building
permits.
HEX2.DOC
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)
MITIGATION MEASURES
•
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
• APPLICANT: Vision Special Needs Housing
PROJECT NAME: Vision Special Needs Housing
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop a Group Home II
consisting of two structures, each located on a separate lot. A 5,000 square foot two-story
duplex would be developed during Phase 1, and a 9,200 square foot 2-story fourplex would be
constructed as part of Phase 2. Buildings would be approximately 25 feet in height; Access
would be from Union Avenue NE. Shared parking:for.8vehicles would be provided in a lot
constructed on the south parcel. A parking modification request has been applied for to provide
five fewer spaces than the Code requires. A private playground would be installed between the
two structures for use by the residents.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL ' _.' South of NE 5th Street, and West of Union Avenue NE
MITIGATION MEASURES:
•
rvt
1. The applicant shall install and maintain Temporary Erosion Control to the satisfaction of the
representative of the Development Services Division(inspector/engineer)prior to the
commencement,and for the duration of the project.
2. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$488.00 for the duplex building and$388.00
per unit for each of the four units in the fourplex. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the
issuance of the building permits.
3. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per average daily trip. The fee
per building is$300 for the duplex,and$600 for the fourplex payable with the building permits. •
This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits.
4. The applicant shall submit the Parks Mitigation Fee of$354.51 per unit(6 units x$354.51=
$2,127.06)prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM,.Monday through Friday,
and Saturday as arranged with the Development Services Division,but no hours in excess of • .
weekday hours,and no site construction/utilities installation on Sunday(e.g.,operation of heavy
equipment). .
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)
ADVISORY.NOTES
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
• APPLICANT: Vision Special Needs Housing
PROJECT NAME: Vision Special Needs Housing
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop a Group Home II consisting
of two structures, each located on a separate lot. A 5,000 square foot two-story duplex would be
developed during Phase 1, and a 9,200 square foot 2-story fourplex would be constructed as part of
Phase 2. Buildings would be approximately 25 feet in height. Access would be from Union Avenue NE.
Shared parking for 8 vehicles would be provided in'a lot constructed on the south parcel. A parking
modification request has been applied.for to provide five fewer spaces than the Code requires. A private
playground would be installed between the two structures for use by the residents:
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: -. South'of NE 5th Street, and West of Union Avenue NE
Advisory Notes to Applicant:
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the
environmental determination.- Because these notes are provided as Information only, they are
not subject to the appeal process,for environmental determinations.".- -
1. PLAN REVIEW
WATER-There is an existing 12-inch diameter water main in Union Ave NE. Two hydrants exist in the
vicinity of the site. One at the intersection of NE 5th Street and Union Avenue NE, and one to
the south of the project site. A City of Seattle 36-inch diameter water line also exists in a City of
Seattle water line easement%right-of-way that Union Avenue NE is built over. •
1. The System Development Charge shall_be at the current rate of$510 per multifamily unit,
payable with the construction permit.
2. Separate water meters for each building is required. A separate sewer-exempt meter for
landscape irrigation are required. •
SEWER-There is an 8-inch diameter sewer line at the southeast corner of Union Avenue NE and NE
5th Street. There is also an 8-inch diameter sewer on the west side of Union Avenue NE to the
south of the proposed project.
1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$350 per multifamily unit which,
is payable with the construction permit.
2. A sanitary sewer extension to this site from across the street is required. The proposed force
main plan will only be considered if the sewer extension is physically impossible to construct due
to the presence of the City of Seattle water main. An easement or permit from the City of
• • Seattle to cross the water line and their easement will be required. If the request for crossing is
rejected,the proposed force main will be considered for review.
•
•
Vision Special Needs Housing/LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
Advisory Notes(Continued)
STORM -There is a 24-inch storm line in Union Avenue NE.
1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$385 per single family site.
2. Plans and calculations for surface water facilities shall be in accordance with the King County
Surface Water Design Manual are required.
TRANSPORTATION & PARKING
1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. Calculations of this
fee are based on the minimal trip generation for the use found in the ITE manual. The fee per
building is$300 for the duplex, and $600.for the fourplex payable with the building permits.
2. Based on the City Code Parking and Loading Ordinance, it appears that 13 parking spaces are
required for the proposal. In order to vary from the Code,the applicant will need to obtain a
modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance. If the modification is not granted,then
the site plan would need to be modified to provide the appropriate number of parking spaces.
PLAN REVIEW-GENERAL
1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards.
2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,two
copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be
submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is in the project file and will be forwarded
to the applicant. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by
the permit system prior to issuing a check::::: ••
FIRE PREVENTION
1. . The preliminary fire flow is3250 GPM,which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the
buildings and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of the buildings. This is based on the
larger building with type 5 non-rated construction: Variation of the construction type may lower
• fire flow requirements.
2. If these homes are to be Licensed Care.facilities under the State Licensed Group Care
requirements,there may be additional fire requirements imposed by the State Regulations.
3. The required fire mitigation fee for the duplex is$488.00,and $388.00/unit for the fourlex, as
discussed in the mitigation measures for the proposal.
POLICE
1. Police estimate approximately 5.52 calls for services annually.
2. Security lighting and fencing of the site is recommended during construction.
3. During operation, coded access entry to the main building is recommended. Each unit should
have solid core doors with dead bolts and peep holes. Sliding windows and doors should have
-additional locks. Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. Stairways should be
constructed of lattice or metal railing so visibility is possible through the stairway. Fencing
should be of slated wood and/or lattice. Extra security lighting should be installed in the parking
lot, along sidewalks, in the playground area, and in the stairways. Lighting should also extend to
the refuse disposal area. Each unit should have individual numbers clearly visible,with the
number at least six inches high and of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and
placed under a light. Landscaping should not be too dense or high.
COMMUNITY SERVICES —PARKS
1. The Parks Mitigation Fee is$354.51 per each multi-family residential unit, as stated in the
Mitigation Measures and is payable with the Building Permit. .
BUILDING DEPARTMENT .
1. Accessible parking and bathrooms shall be provided per WAC 51-30. . .
2 Plans for building permits will be reviewed per the Uniform Building Code 1994. . •
-
3. Structural design must be accomplished by an engineer.
4. A soils report will be required at the time of building permit review. '
PROJECT LUA-97-094, ECF, CU-H
Vision Special Needs Housing
City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
(Continuation)
POLICE RELATED COMMENTS
5.52 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually
" CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To
protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked
up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and should also be completely
fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and
psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private
property.
COMPLETED BUILDING
It is recommended that a coded access entry to the main building be installed to prevent
trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property.
Each unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood with
peepholes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2"in length
when extended and installed with 3"wood screws.
Sliding windows, including the glass patio doors, will need additional locks;these locks
will need to secure the windows from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means
the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any
lock that limits horizontal movement.
Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. The stairways at the complex should be
constructed of lattice or metal railing so visibility is possible through the stairway. There
should not be any solid walls in any stairway that would serve to limit the visibility up and
down the stairs and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a homeowner
to return home. This also holds true for the fencing surrounding the home: it should be of
slated wood panels and/or lattice material.
Extra security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lot, along the sidewalks, in the
children's playground area, and in the stairways. This lighting also needs to be extended
to the garbage disposal site. Proper lighting will provide the extra security needed when
residents are walking to this area in the hours of darkness. Each unit should have their
individual numbers listed clearly,with the number at least 6"in height of a color that
• Page 1 of 2
PROJECT LUA-97-094, ECF, CU-H
Vision Special Needs Housing
City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
(Continuation)
contrasts with the color of the building and placed under a light. This will aid police or
medics who respond to a call in finding the unit they need to go to.
Landscaping around the exterior of the property should not be too dense or high. It is
important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a
fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary
sufficient coverage to break into a unit.
Page 2 of 2
(
City isr,canton Department of Planning/Building/Pt- Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1997
APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED:. JULY 28, 1997
APPLICANT: VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING(VSNH) _ PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING
PROJECT TITLE: VSNH GROUP HOME WORK ORDER NO: 78245
LOCATION: SOUTH OF NE 5TH STREET AND WEST OF UNION AVENUE NE
1
SITE AREA 0.79 ACRE BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures, each on a separate lot. A duplex
would be developed during Phase I, and a fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The proposal requires environmental review,
a conditional use permit is also required in order to exceed the maximum number of six(6)residents.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS
1
Element of the Probable Probable ' More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
• Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Alr Aesthetics
Water Ught/Gla►e
Plants ' Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
`71 a- rX ® vim eV2/64)
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ,
1
rt,r__ C,�l/l�— G�� � GCS
sl'V/? Is t
43S4, sl p . eacA -f2"1 .1y
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
i
„v_i
- if..)17
,�� C 4L `20 O ."--,%, ,.-04
We have reviewed this apptcaflon with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas
where additional Information Is needed petty assess this proposal.
z?")
)4/34/,1;
utho' Re resentat� ir Date
atUf if tor or A p DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93
(�_
•
O.S. O'et)
+ CITY OF RENTON
N.P'NTOe
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 30, 1997
TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Planner
FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal 4
SUBJECT: Vision Special Needs Housing, NE th and Union St.
Fire Department Comments:
1. The preliminary fire flow is 3250 GPM, which requires one hydrant
within 150 feet of the buildings and three additional hydrants within 300
feet of the buildings. This is based on the larger building with type 5 non-
rated construction. Variation of the construction type may lower fire flow
requirements.
2. If these homes are to be Licensed Care facilities under the State
Licensed Group Care requirements, there may be additional fire
requirements imposed by the State Regulations.
3. The required fire mitigation fee for the duplex is $488.00 and
$1552.00 for the fourplex.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
•
_ I
City or Renton Department of Planning/Building/l-Uus Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:a 4dvt s evutu,p COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1997
APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997
APPLICANT: VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING(VSNH) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING
PROJECT TITLE: VSNH GROUP HOME WORK ORDER NO: 78245
LOCATION: SOUTH OF NE 5TH STREET AND WEST OF UNION AVENUE NE CITY OF RENTON
PVrFtVED
SITE AREA: 0.79 ACRE BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A JUL 2 9 1997
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures, each,► as gralq ►t., 0�dialex
would be developed during Phase I, and a fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The proposal requires en 1rolt�har w,
a conditional use permit is also required in order to exceed the maximum number of six(6)residents.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS
Element of tho Probable Probablo More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Intonation Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth) Housing
Air 1 Aesthetics
Water Ught/Glare
Planta. Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities -
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Histork/Cultural
- Natural Resources . Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS A /
I rl G L S s r ; e / b a4-I rcro
G- b — - S v
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas
where,addiitionallnformation Is needed to property assess this proposal.
C'g 8
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date /
DEVAT.DOC Rev.10/93
Y /
•
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 7, 1997
To: Jennifer Toth Henning
From: Kayren K. Kittrick, Plan Review
Subject: Vision Special Needs Housing
LUA-97-094, ECF, CU-H
EXISTING CONDITIONS
WATER - There is an existing 12-inch diameter water main in Union Ave NE. Two hydrants
exist in the vicinity of the site. One at the intersection of NE 5th Street and Union Avenue
NE, and one to the south of the project site. A City of Seattle 36-inch diameter water line
also exists in a City of Seattle water line easement/right of way that Union Avenue NE is
built over.
SEWER - There is an 8-inch diameter sewer line at the southeast corner of Union Avenue NE
and NE 5th Street. There is also an 8-inch diameter sewer on the west side of Union
Avenue NE to the south of the proposed project.
STORM -There is a 24-inch storm line in Union Avenue NE.
STREETS - Union Avenue NE is paved with some amenities.
CODE REQUIREMENTS
WATER
1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $510 per multifamily unit,
payable with the construction permit.
2. Separate water meters for each building is required. A separate sewer-exempt meter for
landscape irrigation is required.
SANITARY SEWER
1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $350 per multifamily unit.
Payable with the construction permit.
2. A sanitary sewer extension to this site from across the street is required. The proposed
force main plan will only be considered if the sewer extension is physically impossible to
construct due to the presence of the City of Seattle water main. An easement or permit
from the City of Seattle to cross the water line and their easement will be required. If the
request for crossing is rejected, the proposed force main will be considered for review.
SURFACE WATER
1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $385 per single family
site.
2. Plans and calculations for surface water facilities in accordance with the King County
Surface Water Design Manual are required.
VISIOI.DOC
TRANSPORTATION
1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. Calculations
of this fee are based on the minimal trip generation for the use found in the ITE manual.
The fee per building is $300 for the duplex, and $600 for the fourplex payable with the
building permits
PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL
1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards.
2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,
two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee
shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use.
However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit
system prior to issuing a check.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the
representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project.
2. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the
Development Services Division.
3. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no
Sunday construction.
CC: Neil Watts
•
VISIOMDOC
it
•
• O
..1111R
I':swaa.• .. •c!�71nre+eC^bi'v:ooay».
kfrk< <Y ..7!1'Y•7'IO�tN'1C1X AGKY MNM a .. . "l-,�f;..�M �N 'C.;�. •. •.. ... S ...wilW' wu0'P%7 T'JYHIivQNMCA9� �� O<� T^3
v
Project Name V5 N N
Project Address 500 vvl iuvt 4,/ !JE
•
Contact Person S u su C_c<w,i P✓e.V
Address ' US NE-) P 0. Box ZqS I Rtmto"i tOA g895%
Phone Number W 2-5 - 22 g - C 3 5 6 • •
Permit Number L O A - 617- o a +-
Project Description. Grotty, -Ho 4twi . I l — du flw at.t. d lou✓fol <
Land Use ype: • Method,_.,of,Calculation: 'p�z Lie �7' C2Z0')
Residential Ll' ITE Trip Generation Manual p ie 3I
0 Retail 0 Traffic Study Ka.Z. — ,ecw.-ccit, `U
0 Non-retail ❑ Other 2.60 -to 11.g I pv, ccia
•
Calculation: ProJeGt ?esci/p(I<;ii su?ges7s , a"--61, �, y.4,v!,yi,teci.
Yip ye evutroil o ve,6vkW144,Atd (<>u..eji cv,( ✓cct,eeie
Tin h - cz) (2.o) _ Lk() «v tv,ps -
Fv� Fcu, : (µ)C 2.0) = V.0 vi ps A-E $75/-e/i r'/'
Dufa,Cey : $.300.00 Tote( I = g00.00
Foul, : 160D•00
Tr1ansportation Mitigation Fee: rvD.. G/
Calculated by: IVY Date: / 50 A 7
Account Number:
Date of Payment
:`•::? 'PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEW 97-
•
. • . DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET . ❑ PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP • •
❑. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET - 0 . ' . . . . • •
��'' OTHER 3 S
APPLICANT: • Ui to/t) ` J?�cl 4-L _/(// J •• c in1Cy RECEIVED FROM !� •
._ ... .JOB ADDRESS: .
NATURE OF WORK:- ..6 gO GREEN it •
• ■ . SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED • NEED MORE INFORMATION: El LEGAL DESCRIPTION
'❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED • . . , 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑ VICINITY MAP
❑ .NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES • . • .• . ' 0 • FRONT FOOTAGE 0 OTHER
❑ VESTED ❑ NOT VESTED • '. . .
• ❑ ' This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# • dated
• - ,,.�y, G ••
0 PARENT PID#(subject to change)_
:•SUBJECT PROPERTY PID#VI3Os—WO . 9/ b 9 ❑ King Co.Tax Acctl(new)
It.is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon
• development of the property:-All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site
.and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances
and determined by the applicable Utility Section. - _ - '
Please note that these fee&are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit
application.
The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT_ - . • 'DISTRICT . PARCEL, METHOD OF: ' ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
DISTRICTS : ..• . • - • NO. • •". 'NO. . ASSESSMENT . .UNITS OR FEE
Latecomer Agreement(pit)WATER - .•_ . . • • . .
: Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER • = - r. , - • . ' . . , . .
..Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER' :: • 0 .'---
' Special Assessment District/WATER -• . . .: .. - . . _ ,
•Special,Assessuientbistrict/WASTEWATER' . • '0002- - . . 67.5(04�S - 3 . acP la/C �les4.
:,'Joint.Use Agreement(METRO) . : .-. .. • . _ ..•-. , a �6
SAY:
.:'Local Improliementbistrict'. -:- - i' •- . , .. .•. -: *.: . .
: Traffic`Benefit Zones '.`-. . :"• -:'::• •. . $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION :
FUTURE OBLIGATIONS. 1. :2:-::r•:•.:::='',: ' ?:•' ...°'. I ;,:'...=::: :,,:.-.1 -,.. .. . . .
'SYSTEM
. M DEVELOPMENT.CHARGE-WATER -:_�;.;:': •:.:�: `:::• :`::":,..?
. .. . . •_. . . . .. . � '�: #OF UNITS/ ' .SDC FEE :.. '.:
0 -Pd Frey:� ❑ ,Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) -•$1 .-Never Pd ;=..:"•;::-::.•'• SQ:FIG.':' ': ` .
Single family residential$850/unit x . - . ' . .. . -. . . = -, - :-. • -:. . , '
:Mobile hone dwelling unit$680/unit in.park - .':.. : ` ' .
'Apartment;Condo$510/unitnot in CD or COR zones x.. . . . .' ' . (p - 30(o•O �nO• •.. : •
• Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq ft.`of property (not less-than$850.00)x - . • ._ : •_ .•
. • Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter a,soo Gear thrishotd) . ._ . • . • . - - .. -
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE=WASTEWATER •.. ••• ;CI Pd Pd Prev: ❑ Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) :::111 Never Pd . - . - • •• ' . .: -•
' Single family residential dwelling unit$585/unit is : . •. .: . • ' 2 . - '
• Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x ... :' . . ' . . . .
• Apartment, Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x • .• (z '$' 1.-(D 0 • OD '
Cominereial/Industrial,$0.078/sq. ft. of property (not less than S585.00)x • • .. . • . . • • • . . .' ' • . : •
REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees. - •. - • : ' . '
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT.CHARGE-SURFACEWATER • -. ` .-. ' ,•. '
❑ Pd Prev.''-.• 'C 'Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption)`• ® :=Never Pd ..::'•: -. . - . . . ' : • .. .
. :Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x .. . . : . •: :,- . : -• - ..
'''..All other properties$0.129/sq ft of new impervious area of property z • . •- :: ', - '
-(not less••t an$3 0) : .. .•. _` :/.:2 30b.:..; P(S$lo'.,?'O
t: g
PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ ..`j L L 3,90 .
s
Si IF!t?"a.f Revieivrn A otit :DATE �y • rj. v
_ 4.
nl'.
If sub ect',ro rt'-is ivithin'a` de��
ri LID it is'd to rs ies' nsi6''t•'
p, pe, y pe• po, >li yto check with tht;'Finance Dt�t:'for paid%un-paid status.-
** ;:
The s�uare'foota�e fi ui�es��used•are�taken`from tlie�Ku �'Count�Assessor's iris'g y, p'arid are'approzirnate only. W
cc%tcmplate/fccapp7 b, ,EFFECTIVE July 16,1995/Ord:`Nos:4506,`4507,-4508 •4525 and`4526 _ • - : ;Di
.r$ f f
d '
9 9
5590 REG STEREO
•
' Y WALIACE
N.E. 5TH STREET "°°W`SHNCTON
- 1207RN W33AR S
E•
I (206)254-1862
•
I 9
I
Q Z En
I wi=CV
I O W N
EVERGREENS&SHADE RAMS \ 1 W
Li
EXISTING ii EXISTING 1 ' , ce
DOUG FlR TREES A\ �\ DOUG AR TREES \ I .
�� o up, As. —ik - •\\ I , . I
IIIIII GARDEN
I W I
Do 111111C Z
c `LAWN I
t «W` PEA GRAVEL`, I W I
`LAWN ROSES I, i
PSG O Z .
�"��� —— — �— ,rl7.�` DETENTION 1 Q W
i, LAWNS �i„�N? �. '^i`• aoND nREA IiVF z
R
TREES
Ilj
I iaa w(n Z fFRUIT i': , 6 I. I < 02<T ff. I 0I—f�' `y o ;' r
II •e . ,.., /
•
a.
a� �..c. ..t., Z Z w
_....III
_ U (A cc
--ar.,.- )1.0,...,6: .......11_,,,--; A fio, , I
c
.
LANDSCAPE PLAN ® 1 �R •
j SCALE 20'0
SCALE: 1"=20'-0" I DATE 07-14-97
DRAWN BY JSW
CHECKED FITS
SHEET
•
L 1 OF
• 9
• `I •
lo REGISTERED A$tCR{T TY .INAUACEN.E. 5TH STREET E 0E WASHINGTON
— — - 1207 NORTH 1360 SINUS
RENION.HA 98056
A (206)254-1862
I ii
I J0cp
QZLO
U CO
co
i CO=N
•
I Za)"
I 5 ci IF)
W c'\1
>"W
_ - - `-——_II .--
PROPERUNEA� oc i. _—'�SETBACK 'I o
Amor . � I -C WON ` �_ ••.
A�L �. "7' '_� MIRO` ^jay ,J• NBC ��I
IlUkkk...11l
CJIdON WC BC�BCD r L �• coNtlN i ,I ,�I I I
EN Ry .� I BET:-
1 T I I i� LEGEND:
1 sED L___ OI‘II °O I TOTAL SITE: 34,680 SF
8,1 _r I - °"� •I���e II PHASE 1
/ `AI' 1I `_`------ ,1 ¢_ ni I t, II I FIRST FLOOR: 2,825 SF
v son- � 'ir= r ''1 I1 �j II SECOND FLOOR: 2,175 SF 9
NI
Z� TOTAL: 5,000 SF
COLON 1, ea ' '1 PHASE 2
L_.__ - I l FIRST FLOOR: 4,600 SF
� - - - — -V'I — L - — —J _- -- -I II w I j SECOND FLOOR: 4,600 SF
ET&MX 1. --r I I I• •
TOTAL: 9,200 SF
�-PROPERTY UNE -'7 —- I _-_ --_ -- -- -- 1'. 11
_oh w TOTAL FOOT PRINT: 7,425 SF
PLO cRa o III >I
II ! PERCENT COVERAGE: 217
I PARKING REQUIRED W
1 r - • - I STANDARD: 7 Z
I ' 'jt4 !',� Z COMPACT: 5 O F-
za_o' I 1i1 '` -I I I 4 I I ACCESSIBLE: 1 =
[:-:'-II rt. 1 1 I I Z I PARKING PROVIDED p Z
< aEn �D I i I I I I STANDARD: 7 z W CC_
I GOWN BED mW10N 1-_ I .-La 1.1 I I I I, _ I • ACCESSIBLE: 1 J f!J W fn
I- 4 Z,J 1 I PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE: NONE d 0=<
Pa 0 ALL OTHER LANDSCAPE: 22,000 SF I_ O O
II mmm ® 1 RED J 3 �+ I ALLOW BUILDING HEIGHT: 2 STORY-30' CO _M
L- • ,_ 111 n o r dam$-• 1'6'1I I PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT: 2 STORY-25' d WO
1 - _-j} r r ! ` Y " I ALLOW BUILDING SETBACK J 1-
I I IXm I i 1 °> •• 1 FRONT: 20' C7 Z
""R ,� I SIDE: 10' Z W
amcE amu .J i I SET&CK ' �_ I REAR: 20' _
�sEraACK I L _ _ _ Jy _ i PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK
( FRONT: 48'
b.
PROPERtt LINE 213.14 �� _ I I I SIDE: 10'
1 ——
REAR: 25'
I I
I
zo-o' 30'-0' -{I II INDEX:
SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION N
SITE PLAN I S, SITE PLAN $
Lt CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
SCALE r=20•-0"
"=20'-0" N III • El GENERALIZED ELEVATIONS DATE oz-la-a7
SCALE: 1
P1 CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE VIEW ORAwN dsw
Ft FLOOR PLANS PHASE I CHECKED BIS
F2 FLOOR PLANS CHASE II SHEET
D1 -- - DRAINAGE PLAN- -- 1
Ti TREE INVENTORY PLAN 0$
9. $ $
IL 1!Illi!�I l,lk;
I.
' I.I
II 'I
111[1
1
•' l lII 1' ' lill I I III
i.l il' ' I � I' i; -L I
I , :
E
fIt®lI . i
!ii ' i I
i
A i 1 ill 'I l
1
•
f II•,,1, ,of •
•
OI _____ ,i1r1 I !I 111_ ; 1 I l !II 1 I
_: Ii1l ' I 1 :,
„f II( i I I '
' , 111 . ,1 1I 1111 1,
1 I I l: i il' ' I. Ii ii li! .
l ;I . I I
I i ,' , I !
I f I I 1I
I •1. i1 : I ' If 11 I
=l
r
i
V ——<,. _,----,---)
ii I
II
l
II;II I 410
,'t
I # ' e
it lI+`ili
I. I I II. i gil
'I t 111
1 'i: :. 11 i Il`i'Ii,,
Frl 'I•';I E 111
X I ! i t i i
m .� I'I ! i li tit 4411,41
' I1 i i it
..
I ; II I I7 q
II I li I i:.p ' IC , i�1�!�I ` Ihlg
' : .I' I ,. 1 i .m . I�I'll 11 I i III Ii � iw . _1 II 1.
1 1-- T D':!11 1 ; .
iliiiil b;
m iRLIRa
D
I O I' 1 I ' 1 - -''I:I ',s �:
I y� III -, I
z ilk` I
il, l r,'.
II;;1 1!. ........!1i1Ill t
1 III 11 111 11111111111 'I'l
(21) - -9-6 -
24'-0"
0, m. ..,0 0.•MIIMINEMMI0 a o SuennE ( GENERALIZED ELEVATIONS OWNER
nl TILE PROPOSED ti N
o m SINGLE MOTHERS HOME VISION SPECIAL w2 -g. a
NEEDS HOUSING ti RENTON, WASHINGTON ' E f ""
CO CO (425) 228-6356 Pri m
0 $ 0®0 4
00
$ • 9 9
5590 REG STE ED
C T
Y .•WALIACE
ST 7E OF WASHINGTON
' _ - -- - - - - - I I 1207 NORM 33RD STREET
I RENTON•WA 98056__ - _ - -)
(206)254-1862
BED BED d •
SEMI-
SEMI- COMMON
COMMON BED
COMMON
L] ¢ZLo
1" H -
-
, ••."1 BATH Ud 2 CV
0 n rill 1 BED I Z CO CV
LL 1
BED _BATH DINING KITCHEN �-TL e- f _ W N
I 5Zw
3
Y O 4
L
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/8"=1•-0"
■
•
•
•
LU
� �7 BED BED I SEMI- a ji = o 0
. SEMI- COMMON jo < =CZ
COMMON BED"t. 1COMMON "'
_ , .
,---1 ..--_--, . .._\., _...,„ ,._ ,, ,, ,
n. CW ID LLI CO
o W O
0
BED DINING g°� ' []gym BED z w
BATH KIT r-1 c C
Ai ' -I... . .° /h... )1 II . --.--. .
I„
ENTRY - L'
WAIT 4" $
OFFICE OFFICE jSDATE CALE v0B=1-o
7-14-97
DRAWN BY JSW
_ CHECKED BTS
- — - - --— - - - - - _ _ _ SHEET
FIRST FLOOR PLANv� - 5
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" 4 I F 1 of
4- r 8
4
5590 REC STEREO
C
Y WALLACE
_. ._ -IST TE Of WASNRlOTON
(��,-p�-�j� II ` 1207 NORTH 3YRI STREET
F i�.1 L-- D \ L RENTON,WA 98056
y v) 2 00 BED • / SEMI- 1 - ( - _ (206)TN-18fi7 h
• NT>KITCHEN �1 !m _ ` COMMON SEMI- ` BED " II°I Y
�- 1 � � �a II M I •
Oo �/'� COMMON y'mr KITCHENS _lc,
O
�� fr, l .� 1 U L� .� • ¢z
/COMMON7. M
U Co-
• DINING .ly. BED BED 1 L BED.._ COMMON =N
BED :rL DINING 0z co
‘ , ' _ ____, 1 1
w N
ENTRY - • 1 - e
BED L
LTBATH� _ _ - ENTRY
• 1 BED
0 IA �, = BATH
V a _—__ __ I g I O
SEMI- V-
BED
COMMON
•
- 1 BED SEMI $
• I COMMON
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
•
JSECOND FLOOR SIMILAR :FE,z• t SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" 4 =(i7) Q zfn
PLAY GROUND z 0=a
o w0
0 J H
Z W
CC
• • $
SCALE 1/8'=1'-0-
• DATE 07-14-97
DRAWN BY JSW
CHECKED BTS
. F2 or:
• 4
� Washington State Northwest Region
�I/ Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North
Sid Morrison •
P.O. Box 330310
Secretary of Transportation Seattle,WA 98133-9710 R
ECFIVEn
• (206)440-4000
AUG 2 5 1997
DATE: August 21, 1997 .•'DEVELOrn,,EN..PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
TO: Ms. Jennifer Toth Henning
Project Manager
City of Renton Environmental Review Committee •
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
SUBJECT: I-405 MP 4.19 CS 1743
Determination of Nonsignificance
Vision Special Need Group Home
crn V4At ie)-7 File#LUA-97-094, ECF, CU-H.
FROM: Robert A. Josephson, PE, Manager of Planning &Local Coordination
Washington State Department of Transportation •
Northwest Region
15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122
P.O. Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133-9710 •
•
Dear Ms. Toth Henning:
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the Vision Special Needs Housing.
The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system and we have no
further comments.
If you have any questions,please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Chad Hancock at
440-4914 of my Developer Services section.
CH:ch
c:\chad\renton\visnhome.doc
4
> `<At.P.ib.VIT<; ::R,;>,>;:E::VI::; : ::2:R> m"-.AI` N:?BI MI j ` +4 Mii MVMI'7>' > `'>' .
>:<:;::>:::::>::>::;::::»:::;::;:<:;:>:;::>�:>::>::>::>::::::>:<:>:>::»::><::::::>::::>::>::;::>::;:>:;;::<:>::>::: F DAVtT:. .F.. ER�'I.CE..BY.1VIAfUN. . ...
1 •
On the 156 day of /l uL , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United
States, a sealed envelope containing
ERC. dctevw tind1Cvv
documents. This information was sent to:
Name Representing
Department of Ecology
Don Hurter WSDOT
KC Wastewater Treatment Division
Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries
David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources
Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities
Duwamish Indian Tribe •
Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
•
•
Rita Perstac Puget Power
•
•
(Signature of Sender) SOMA
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) •
) SS
COUNTY OF KING )
•
I:certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that .rnc12A k L. Seeerox signed this
instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for thd uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument.
•
atA.8
Dated: /r' 11/i
Notary Publi and of r he State of :1.hin ton
; K A`f %. Notary(Print)
%or• : _____*AmeNitedvienem,
My appointment ex •
'r+ ` •n COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99
•
`.Pr41ecf`w' G
,., . e $,�-°Vi5tmv• Spectal needs tioustI� Cirou p 4iowmc
•
Pro ec �lurr :�' L AM'S I1 O°I41! Cl)-tt I E Grp
•
NOTARY.DOC •
„ CITE _DF RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
August 14, 1997-
Washington State
Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
PO Box 47703
Olympia,WA 98504-7703
Subject: Environmental Determinations
Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by
the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on August 12, 1997:
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME •,
PROJECT NO. LUA-97-094,CU-H,ECF
.The applicant proposes to develop a Group Home II consisting of two structures, each located on a separate lot. A 5,000
square foot two-story duplex would be developed during Phase 1, and a 9,200 square foot 2-story fourplex would be
constructed as part of Phase 2. Buildings would be approximately 25 feet in height. Access would be from Union Avenue NE.
Shared parking for 8 vehicles would be provided in a lot constructed on the south parcel. A parking modification request has
been applied for to provide five fewer spaces than the Code.requires. A private playground would be installed between the two
structures for use by the residents: Location: South of NE 5th Street, and West of Union Avenue NE.
•Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 01, 1997.
Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous
procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the
time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments, if Environmental Review Committee finds
there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will no further extension of the appeal period. Any
person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must
be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South,
Renton,WA 98055. If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day
comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant
will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify the
appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental Review
Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in
writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 01, 1997. Appeals must
be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South,
Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional
information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501
If you have questions, please call me at(425)277-6186.
For the Environmental Review Committee,
Jennifer Toth Henning .
Project Manager
cc: . King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro
Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries
David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources
Don Hurter, Department of Transportation
Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities
Duwamish Tribal Office :
Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance)
Rita Perstac, Puget Power
• 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055
This moor contains 50%racvclad malarial_90.nnst reins(mar
•
�., CITE OF RENTON
•
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
August 13, 1997
•
•
Ms. Susan Camerer
Vision Special Needs Housing
PO Box 2951
Renton, WA 98056
SUBJECT: Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home,
Project No. LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
Dear Ms. Camerer:
'This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review .Committee.(ERC) and is to inform you that they have
completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on August 12,
1997 issued a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with conditions. See the enclosed Mitigation
Measures document.
Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September
01, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is -
based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not
be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if
Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there
will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal ;
appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review
Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of-
the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then
the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be
notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify
the appellant/person requesting reconsideration,and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental
Review Committee's final 'determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the
Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 01, 1997.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,
200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code
Section 4-8-11 B. 'Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the'Renton City Clerk's
Office, (425)-235-2501
WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for mitigation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the
extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action.:Since an environmental impact statement
has not been prepared for this project, any mitigation measures established by the ERC not directly attributable to an
identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. . •
•
DNSMLTR nnc
200 Mill Avenue South-Renton, Washington 98055
_ I
Ms. Susan CamererNision Special Needs Housing
Project No. LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
Page-2- - •
I
•
Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g., the Public Works Division) as soon as
possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation measures for this project, if you have specific
questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise
your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so.
A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the
second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on September 9. 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Conditional
Use. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the
staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal
will be heard as part of this public hearing.
If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)277-6186.
For the Environmental Review Committee,'- • ""
Aid
ennifer Toth Henning
Project Manager . . •
cc: Property Owners: Mr. Stanley Stone, Mr.Arthur Swanson,
Ms. Barbara Schellert, Ms. Beatrice McNeil
Enclosure
•
•
•
•
dnsmltr - ..
A
•
CITY OF RENTON
•
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)
MITIGATION MEASURES
APPLICATION NO(S): .LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
APPLICANT:. Vision Special Needs Housing
PROJECT NAME: Vision Special Needs Housing
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: . The applicant proposes to develop a Group Home II
consisting of two structures, each located on a separate lot. A 5,000 square foot two-story
duplex would be developed during Phase,1, and a 9,200 square foot 2-story fourplex would be
constructed as part of Phase 2. Buildings would be approximately 25 feet in height. Access
would be from Union Avenue NE. . Shared parking•for.8 vehicles would be provided in a lot
- constructed on the south parcel. A; parking,modification'request has been applied for to provide
five fewer spaces than the Code requires. A private playground would be installed between the
.two structures for use by the.residents:
=LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: j,." South of NE 5thStreet,and West of Union Avenue NE
MITIGATION MEASURES: :
1. The applicant shall install and maintain Temporary Erosion Control to the satisfaction of the
. representative of the Development Services Division(inspector/engineer)prior to the
commencement,and for the duration of the project
2. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation tee Of$488.00 for the duplex building and$388.00 •
per unit for each of the four units in the'fourplex. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the
issuance of the building permits. •
: :: i..=
3. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per average daily trip. The fee
per building is$300 for the duplex,and$600 for the fourplex payable with the building permits:
This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits.
4, The applicant shall submit the Parks Mitigation Fee of$354.51 per unit(6 units x$354.51=
$2,127.06)prior to the issuance of building permits.
•
5. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM,Monday through Friday,
and Saturday as arranged with the Development Services Division but no hours in excess of -.
weekday hours,and no site installation-on Sunday(e.g.,operation of heavy :
equipment). .:
I
CITY OF R ENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)
ADVISORY NOTES
Ill
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
• I
APPLICANT: Vision Special Needs Housing
PROJECT NAME: Vision Special Needs Housing " p
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop a Group Home II consisting •
of two structures, each located on a separate lot. A 5,000 square foot two-story duplex would be
developed during Phase 1, and a 9,200 square foot 2-story fourplex would be constructed as part of
Phase 2. Buildings would be approximately 25 feet in height. Access would be from Union Avenue NE.
Shared parking for 8 vehicles would be provided;in a lot constructed on the south parcel. A parking
modification request has been applied for to provide five fewer'spaces than the Code requires. A private
• playground would be installed between the two structures for use bythe residents.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: South of NE 5th Street, and West of Union Avenue NE
Advisory Notes to Applicant:
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the
environmental determination.`°Because these;notes are provided as information only, they are
not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations.
1. PLAN REVIEW
WATER-There is an existing 12-inch"diaineter water main in Union Ave NE Two hydrants exist in the .
vicinity of the site..One at the intersection of NE 5th Street and Union Avenue NE, and one to
the south of the project site.' A City of Beattie36-inch diameter water line also exists in a City of
Seattle water line easement/right-of way that Union Avenue NE is built over.
1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$510 per multifamily unit,
payable with the construction permit.
2. Separate water meters for each building is required. A separate sewer-exempt meter for
landscape irrigation are required.. : . .
SEWER There is an 8-inch diameter sewer line at the southeast corner of Union Avenue NE and NE
5th Street. There is also an 8-inch diameter sewer on the west side of Union Avenue NE to the
south of the proposed project.
1. •The System Development Charge shall be,at the current rate of$350 per multifamily unit which
• is payable with the construction.permit.
2. A sanitary sewer extension to this site from across the street is required. The proposed force .
main plan will only be considered if the sewer extension is physically impossible to construct due
to the presence of the City of Seattle water main. An easement or permit from the City of
Seattle to cross the water line and their easement will be required. If the request for crossing is
rejected,the proposed force main will be considered for review.
Vision Special Needs Housing/LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
Advisory Notes(Continued)
STORM-There is a 24-inch storm line in Union Avenue NE.
1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$385 per single family site.
2. Plans and calculations for surface water facilities shall be in accordance with the King County
Surface Water Design Manual are required.
TRANSPORTATION&PARKING
1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. Calculations of this
fee are based on the minimal trip generation for the use found in the ITE manual. The fee per
building is$300 for the duplex, and $600 for the fourplex payable with the building permits.
2. Based on the City Code Parking and Loading Ordinance, it appears that 13 parking spaces are
required for the proposal. In order to vary from the Code,the applicant will need to obtain a
modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance. If the modification is not granted,then
the site plan would need to be modified to provide the appropriate number of parking spaces.
PLAN REVIEW-GENERAL
1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. :,..
2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,two
copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be
submitted to the fourth floor counter.'A fee worksheet is in the project file and will be forwarded
to the applicant. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by
the permit system prior to issuing a check.
FIRE PREVENTION
1.. The preliminary fire"flow is 3250 GPM,which-requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the
buildings and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of the buildings. This is based on the
larger building with type 5 non-rated construction. Variation of the construction type may lower
• fire flow requirements:
2. If these homes are to be Licensed Care facilities under the State Licensed Group Care
requirements,there maybe additional fire requirements imposed by the State Regulations.
3. The required fire mitigation fee for the duplex is$488.00 and $388.00/unit for the fourlex, as
discussed in the mitigation measures for the proposal.
POLICE
1. Police estimate approximately 5.52 calls for services annually.
2. Security lighting and fencing of the site is recommended during construction.
3. During operation, coded access entry to the main building is recommended. Each unit should
have solid core doors with dead bolts and peep holes. Sliding windows and doors should have
additional locks. Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. Stairways should be '
constructed of lattice or metal railing so visibility is possible through the stairway. Fencing
should be of slated wood and/or lattice. Extra security lighting should be installed in the parking
lot, along sidewalks, in the playground area, and in the stairways. Lighting should also extend to
the refuse disposal area. Each unit should have individual numbers clearly visible,with the
number at least six inches high and of a:color that contrasts with the color of the building and
placed under a light. Landscaping should not be too dense or high. '
COMMUNITY SERVICES-PARKS
1. The Parks Mitigation Fee is$354.51 per each multi-family residential unit, as stated in the
Mitigation Measures and is payable with the Building Permit.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1. Accessible parking and bathrooms shall be provided per WAC 51-30. .
2 Plans for building permits will be reviewed per the Uniform Building Code 1994.
3. Structural design must be accomplished by an engineer.
" 4. A soils report will be required at the time of building permit review.
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
APPLICANT: Vision Special Needs Housing
PROJECT NAME: Vision Special Needs Housing
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop a Group Home II consisting of two structures,
each located on a separate lot. A 5,000 square foot two-story duplex would be developed during Phase 1, and a 9,200
square foot 2-story fourplex would be constructed as part of Phase 2. Buildings would be approximately 25 feet in height.
Access would be from Union Avenue NE. Shared parking for 8 vehicles would be provided in a lot constructed on the
south parcel. A parking modification request has been applied for to provide five fewer spaces than the Code requires.
A private playground would be installed between the two structures for use by the residents.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: South of NE 5th Street, and West of Union Avenue NE
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
Development Planning Section
The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their
authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts
identified during the environmental review process.
Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September
01, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is
based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not
be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if
Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there
will no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal
appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review
Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. If an appeal of
the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day comment period, then
the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and the appellant will be
notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request. The City will notify
the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of the Environmental
Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the appellant notifies the
Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal.
Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 01, 1997.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,
200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code
Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's
Office, (425)-235-2501
PUBLICATION DATE: August 18, 1997
DATE OF DECISION: August 12, 1997
SIG ATURES:
feka06,." 41/2/q7 ,
Gre g Zim r a Administrator DAT
i
Depart ht of annin /Buildin /Public Works
P, 9 9
Sa Chastai ,Administrat DATE
Co unit Servic De a ,ent
,/ ,%(/ , ..,...._,_..., e= 4 - P7
Le eela, Fire Chief DATE
Renton Fire Department
Document2 ,.
•
•
•
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)..
MITIGATION MEASURES
•
APPLICATIONNO(S): LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
APPLICANT: Vision Special Needs Housing
PROJECT NAME: Vision Special Needs Housing _ ..
DESCRIPTION OFPROPOSAL': The applicant proposes to develop a Group Home II
consisting of two structures, each located on a separate lot. A 5,000 square foot two-story
duplex would be developed during Phase 1, and a 9,200 square foot 2-story fourplex would be
constructed as part of Phase 2. Buildings would ,be approximately 25 feet in height; Access
would be from Union Avenue NE: Shared parking for 8 vehicles would be provided in a lot
constructed on the south parcel. A parking modification request has been applied for to provide
five fewer spaces than the Coderequiresh A private playground_would be installed between the
two structures for use by the residents. r.,
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL ' South of NE 5th Street, and West of Union Avenue NE
MITIGATION MEASURES:
1. The applicant shall install and maintain Temporary Erosion Control to the satisfaction of the
representative of the Development Services Division(inspector/engineer)prior to the -
commencement,and for the duration of the project. •
2. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$488 00 for�the duplex building and$388.00
. per unit for each of the four Units in the fourplex. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the .
issuance of the building permits."
•
3. The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per average daily trip. The fee
per building is$300 for the duplex,and$600 for the fourplex payable with the building permits.
This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. .
4. The applicant shall submit the Parks Mitigation Fee of$354.51 per unit(6 units x$354.51=
$2,127.06)prior to the issuance of building permits. •
•
5. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM,.Monday through Friday,
and Saturday as arranged with the Development Services Division,but no hours in excess of. -
weekday hours,and no site construction/utilities installation on Sunday(e.g.,operation of heavy
•equipment). :
•
•
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
(MITIGATED)
• ADVISORY NOTES
•
APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
APPLICANT: Vision Special Needs Housing
PROJECT NAME: Vision Special Needs Housing
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to develop a Group Home II consisting
of two structures, each located on a separate lot. 'A 5,000 square foot two-story duplex would be
developed during Phase 1, and a 9,200 square foot 2-story'fourplex would be constructed as part of
Phase 2. Buildings would be approximately 25 feet in height. Access would be from Union Avenue NE.
Shared parking for 8 vehicles would be provided in 'a'lot constructed on the south parcel. A parking
modification request has been applied,for to provide five fewer spaces than the Code requires. A private
playground would be installed between the two structures for use by the residents:
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: :South of NE 5th Street,and West of Union Avenue NE
Advisory Notes to Applicant:
-. The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the
environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are
• not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations.A;; -
1. PLAN REVIEW
WATER-There is an existing 12-inch diameter water main in Union Ave NE. Two hydrants exist in the
vicinity of the site. One at the intersection of NE 5th Street and Union Avenue NE, and one to
the south of the project site.. A City of Seattle 36-inch diameter water line also exists in a City of
Seattle water line easement/right-of-way that Union Avenue NE is built over.
1. The System Development Charge'shall be at the current rate of$510 per multifamily unit,
payable,with the construction permit. -
2. Separate water meters for each building is required. 'A separate sewer-exempt meter for
landscape irrigation are required.
SEWER.There is an 8-inch diameter sewer line at the southeast corner of Union Avenue NE and NE
5th Street. There is also an 8-inch diameter sewer on the west side of Union Avenue NE to the
south of the proposed project.
1. . The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$350 per multifamily unit which
is payable with the construction permit
2. A sanitary sewer extension to this site from across the street is required.:The proposed force
main plan will only be considered if the sewer extension is physically impossible to construct due
to the presence of the City of Seattle water main: 'An easement or permit from the City of
Seattle to cross the water line and their easement will be required. If the request for crossing is
rejected, the proposed force main.will be considered for review.
•
Vision Special Needs HousinglLUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
Advisory Notes(Continued)
STORM-There is a 24-inch storm line in Union Avenue NE.
1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$385 per single family site.
2. Plans and calculations for surface water facilities shall be in accordance with the King County
Surface Water Design Manual are required.
TRANSPORTATION& PARKING
1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. Calculations of this
- fee are based on the minimal trip generation for the use found in the ITE manual. .The fee per
building is$300 for the duplex, and $600.for the fourplex payable with the building permits.
2. Based on the City Code Parking and Loading Ordinance, it appears that 13 parking spaces are
required for the proposal. In order to vary from the Code,the applicant will need to obtain a
modification from the Parking and Loading Ordinance: If the modification is not granted,then
the site plan would need to be modified to provide the appropriate number of parking spaces.
PLAN REVIEW-GENERAL
1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards.
2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings',two
copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be
submitted to the fourth floor counter.,A fee worksheet is in the project file and will be forwarded
to the applicant. However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by
the permit system prior to issuing a check: - •
FIRE PREVENTION
1. The preliminary fire flow is 3250 GPM,which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the
• buildings and three additional hydrants within 300 feet of the buildings. This is based on the
larger building with type 5 non-rated Construction.‘Variation of the construction type may lower
fire flow requirements.
2. If these homes are to be Licensed Care facilities under the State Licensed Group Care
requirements,there may be additional fire requirements imposed by the State Regulations.
3. The required fire mitigation fee for the duplex is$488.00 and $388.00/unit for the fourlex, as
discussed in the mitigation measures for the proposal.
POLICE •
1. Police estimate approximately 5.52 calls for services annually.
2. Security lighting and fencing of the site is recommended during construction.
3. During operation, coded access entry to the main building is recommended. Each unit should
have solid core doors with dead bolts and peep holes. Sliding windows and doors should have
additional locks. Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. Stairways should be
constructed of lattice or metal railing so visibility is possible through the stairway.. Fencing
should be of slated wood and/or lattice. Extra security lighting should be installed in the parking
lot, along sidewalks, in the playground area, and in the stairways. Lighting should also extend to
the refuse disposal area. Each unit should have individual numbers clearly visible,with the
number at least six inches high and of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and
placed under a light. Landscaping should not be too dense or high.
COMMUNITY SERVICES —PARKS
1. The Parks Mitigation Fee is$354.51 per each multi-family residential unit, as stated in the •
Mitigation Measures and is payable with the Building Permit.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1. Accessible parking and bathrooms shall be provided per WAC 51-30.
2 : Plans for building permits will be reviewed per the Uniform Building Code 1994. -
3. Structural design must be accomplished by an engineer.
4. A soils report will be required at the time of building permit review: • .
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance -
Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code.
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING
LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
Environmental review for proposed development of a group home consisting of two
structures. South of NE 5th Street, and West of Union Avenue NE.
The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal
periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on September 01, 1997. Written comments shall be
forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the
project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review
Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton,
Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First
Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular
meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on September
9, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the proposed Conditional Use Permit. If the Environmental
Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested
parties are invited to attend the public hearing.
Publication Date: AUGUST 18, 1997
Account No. 51067
dnsmpub.dot
• ,
It rI •
itil
t 4
•
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION ,
' PROJECT NAME: VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME
- PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
• The applicant proposes to develop a Group Home II consisting of two structures,each located on a '
separate lot. A 5.000 square foot two-story duplex would be developed during Phase 1,and a 9,200
square foot 2-story fourplex would be constructed as part of Phase 2. Buildings'would be
approximately 25 feet In height. Access would be from Union Avenue NE. Shared parking for 8 .
vehicles would be provided in a lot constructed on the south parcel. A parking modification request '
has been applied for to provide five fewer spaces than the Code requires.A private playground would
be installed between the two structures for use by the residents. Location:South of NE 5th Street,
and West of Union Avenue NE. i
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED.
THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE '
ENVIRONMENT. I
•
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. '
E=I YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 01,1997 OR •
APPEAL.THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,SEPTEMBER 01.1997. THE COMMENT AND •
APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY.
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR '
MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL•RENTON,
WASHINGTON, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, I '
RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 09, 1997 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE i
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED,THE ,
APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARINNG. I
1,11 at;fd
`, . ;I: :g at;; ,: :- _- ,
li fnJO,t E .,,diry$;u f ly:-.• ,f�.,r ,x� ;7-1
'1 11 Il^ w I c
i S RR ):: ti. j,`_,,!i.•' ':;::::: . .
0 .
. - i4:4; a1,114' . ....° :.0 .�
..
'.
'!}- i --_ -tps rn t-
It i r• o.. " �. • .
itt, II ."° i•
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
1 For-proper Identification,please Include the project NUMBER when calling,!:,',.
— CERTIFICATION
Ir • Hirri/C/A✓f 17 , hereby certify that .3 copies of the above document
were posted by me in .7 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on
•
" Signed: : % �I�
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS
COUNTY OF KING ) •
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that rn � f1 rl_, t7�Tl,
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volu.Ei� „��y� �'�fc `e• uses
: etP0seZm
the instrument •d: q,3/ -/ . w ---�'" .
. Notary Publ• n and f i e State.df�ll� s o tan` .
. 4J , C tS'
Notary (Print) MARGARET"J. PULLAR
My appointment exp'
NOTARY.DOC
t
A FY.4 ;lc
, .0 ,
OF . .
' ••
f {.
, A4
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
PROJECT NAME: VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME
PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
The applicant proposes to develop a Group Home II consisting of two structures, each located on a
separate lot. A 5,000 square foot two-story duplex would be developed during Phase 1, and a 9,200
square foot 2-story fourplex would be constructed as part of Phase 2. Buildings would be
approximately 25 feet in height. Access would be from Union Avenue NE. Shared parking for 8
vehicles would be provided in a lot constructed on the south parcel. A parking modification request
has been applied for to provide five fewer spaces than the Code requires. A private playground would
be installed between the two structures for use by the residents. Location: South of NE 5th Street,
and West of Union Avenue NE. .
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED
THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED.
xxx YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 01, 1997 OR
APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, SEPTEMBER 01, 1997. THE COMMENT AND
APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY.
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR
MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON,
WASHINGTON, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL,
RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 09, 1997 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE
APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING.
:Sy,10 , 1 i 11-
O:L�`,l' 1: ,4o ,x ,r .I is,•, '':,T R:..F:1 1? c R A R
a!4a •T yap {.}r' 1 '61{r I ., ,
ems `
;.f
f'. i s lv o6. .nag`.t.,n-„,- .
W.
t f,3 o pl i' r;r .�g1n,.7 1' ,.." fig,a%o,
I —
Pn sI ...,..' „? © La., 'p'— '� � 1' f p T./� R t .4 4'�
I_1 ® ' '' ,ice °,
la;.: i is a: PI '�
:: 1 l! '-:,,,k' j.4 rr 4 , l�I °v ell 4.
_—. -- .. vto v_� __,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. •
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
;::,;:::< . fc do le se.rnclu e>the': ro'ect=NUMBER':when calli <„ :o; ;<<;::i,
Frrr.proper. dent„ .:.a .n,:p:.: ::::..:.:.. ::. h;:.1:;: ..... .::.,:.:.::>..::::- ;:g,::.>.::.:::::::.::. .::.
STAFF City of Renton
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
REPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
A. BACKGROUND
ERC MEETING DATE August 12, 1997
Project Name Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home
Applicant Vision Special Needs Housing
File Number LUA-097-094,CU,ECF Project Manager Jennifer Toth
Henning
Project Description The applicant proposes to develop a Group Home II consisting of two structures, each
located on a separate lot. A 5,000 square foot two-story duplex would be developed on
the north parcel during Phase 1, and a 9,200 square foot 2-story fourplex would be
constructed on the south parcel in Phase 2. Buildings would be approximately 25 feet
in height. A private playground would be installed between the two structures for use
by the residents. Access to the site would be from Union Avenue NE.
Shared parking for 8 vehicles would be provided in a lot constructed on the south
parcel. A parking modification has been requested to allow the applicant to provide
five fewer parking spaces than.the 13 required by City Code. Documentation
submitted by the applicant states that only one-third of the adult residents in this type
of program own a car. Furthermore, public bus transportation is located on the street
adjoining the project site, grocery shopping, daycare, and other services are within
walking distance, and on-street parking is available. The parking modification request
will be considered separately and a decision issued by the Planning/Building/Public
Works Department Administrator.
The project would include several garden areas, an orchard, lawns, and perennial
borders. Six of the 11 large existing Douglas fir trees located on the north lot would be
retained as part of the site landscaping. Existing understory vegetation, and five
existing trees would be cleared as part of the proposal.
Approximately 2,500 cubic yards of fill material would be imported to the site for
construction of the project. A 600 square foot stormwater detention pond would be
constructed adjacent to Union Avenue NE on the northeast portion of the site. The
proposal requires environmental review, and a conditional use permit in order to exceed
the maximum number of six (6) residents in a group home. Each unit would be able to
accommodate up to 10 persons.
Project Location South of NE 5th Street,and West of Union Avenue NE
Exist. Bldg.Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg.Area gsf 14,200 sq. ft.
Project Location Map ERCRPT.DOC
City of Renton PB/Department 1 'mental Review Committee Staff Report
Vision Special Needs Housing LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
REPORT AND DECISION OF August 12,1997 Page2 of 7
Site Area 0.79 acre Total Building Area gsf 14,200 sq. ft.
RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of
Non-Significance-Mitigated
B. RECOMMENDATION
Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make
the following Environmental Determination:
' DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF
NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED.
Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with
Concurrent 14 da A eal Period.
Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period
Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period.
C. MITIGATION MEASURES
1. The applicant shall install and maintain Temporary Erosion Control to the satisfaction of the representative of
the Development Services Division (inspector/engineer)prior to the commencement, and for the duration of the
project.
2. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$488.00 for the duplex building and $388.00 per unit for
each of the four units in the fourplex. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building
permits.
3 1 The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per average daily trip. The fee per building
is$300 for the duplex, and$600 for the fourplex payable with the building permits. This fee shall be submitted
prior to the issuance of building permits.
4. The applicant shall submit the Parks Mitigation Fee of$354.51 per unit (6 units x$354.51 = $2,127.06) prior
to the issuance of building permits.
5.1
Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM,Monday through Friday,and Saturday as
arranged with the Development Services Division, but no hours in excess of weekday hours, and no site
construction/utilities installation on Sunday(e.g., operation of heavy equipment).
Advisory Notes to Applicant:
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because
these notes are provided as information only,they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determination&
1. PLAN REVIEW
WATER-There is an existing 12-inch diameter water main in Union Ave NE. Two hydrants exist in the vicinity of the
site. One at the intersection of NE 5th Street and Union Avenue NE, and one to the south of the project site. A
City of Seattle 36-inch diameter water line also exists in a City of Seattle water line easement/right-of-way that
Union Avenue NE is built over.
1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$510 per multifamily unit, payable with the
ERCRPT.DOC
City of Renton P/B/Department ] onmental Review Committee Staff Report
Vision Special Needs Housing - LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
REPORT AND DECISION OFAugust 12,1997 Page3 of 7
construction permit.
2. Separate water meters for each building is required. A separate sewer-exempt meter for landscape irrigation are
required.
SEWER-There is an 8-inch diameter sewer line at the southeast corner of Union Avenue NE and NE 5th Street. There
is also an 8-inch diameter sewer on the west side of Union Avenue NE to the south of the proposed project.
1 The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$350 per multifamily unit which is payable with
the construction permit.
2. A sanitary sewer extension to this site from across the street is required. The proposed force main plan will only
be considered if the sewer extension is physically impossible to construct due to the presence of the City of
Seattle water main. An easement or permit from the City of Seattle to cross the water line and their easement
will be required. If the request for crossing is rejected,the proposed force main will be considered for review.
STORM-There is a 24-inch storm line in Union Avenue NE.
1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of$385 per single family site.
2. Plans and calculations for surface water facilities shall be in accordance with the King County Surface Water
Design Manual are required.
TRANSPORTATION&PARKING
1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. Calculations of this fee are based
on the minimal trip generation for the use found in the ITE manual. The fee per building is $300 for the duplex,
and$600 for the fourplex payable with the building permits.
2L Based on the City Code Parking and Loading Ordinance, it appears that 13 parking spaces are required for the
proposal. In order to vary from the Code,the applicant will need to obtain a modification from the Parking and
Loading Ordinance. If the modification is not granted, then the site plan would need to be modified to provide
the appropriate number of parking spaces.
PLAN REVIEW-GENERAL
1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards.
2. A construction permit is required. When plans,are complete three copies of the drawings, two copies-of the
drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee shall be submitted to the fourth floor
counter. A fee worksheet is in the project file and will be forwarded to the applicant. However, it is
recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit system prior to issuing a check.
FIRE PREVENTION
1. The preliminary fire flow is 3250 GPM, which requires one hydrant within 150 feet of the buildings and three
additional hydrants within 300 feet of the buildings. This is based on the larger building with type 5 non-rated
construction. Variation of the construction type may lower fire flow requirements.
2. If these homes are to be Licensed Care facilities under the State Licensed Group Care requirements, there may
be additional fire requirements imposed by the State Regulations.
3. The required fire mitigation fee for the duplex is $488.00 and $388.00/unit for the fourlex, as discussed in the
mitigation measures for the proposal.
POLICE
1. Police estimate approximately 5.52 calls for services annually.
21. Security lighting and fencing of the site is recommended during construction.
3. During operation, coded access entry to the main building is recommended. Each unit should have solid core
doors with dead bolts and peep holes. Sliding windows and doors should have additional locks. Alarm systems
are recommended for each unit. Stairways should be constructed of lattice or metal railing so visibility is
possible through the stairway. Fencing should be of slated wood and/or lattice. Extra security lighting should
be installed in the parking lot, along sidewalks, in the playground area, and in the stairways. Lighting should
ERCRPT.DOC
Cily of Renton P/B/Department onmental Review Committee Staff Report
Vision Special Needs Housing - LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
REPORT AND DECISION OF August 12,1997 Page4 of 7
also extend to the refuse disposal area. Each unit should have individual numbers clearly visible, with the
number at least six inches high and of a color that contrasts with the color of the building and placed under a
light. Landscaping should not be too dense or high.
COMMUNITY SERVICES--PARKS
1. The Parks Mitigation Fee is $354.51 per each multi-family residential unit, as stated in the Mitigation Measures
and is payable with the Building Permit.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1. Accessible parking and bathrooms shall be provided per WAC 51-30.
2 Plans for building permits will be reviewed per the Uniform Building Code 1994.
3., Structural design must be accomplished by an engineer.
4. A soils report will be required at the time of building permit review.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed
development?
1., Earth
Impacts: The proposed project would require import of approximately 2,500 cubic yards of fill material during the
construction phase. Access to the site would be from Union Avenue NE and the number of truck trips would increase as
hauling occurs during construction.
The Building Department will require that a soils report be submitted during review of the building plans. The applicant
will also need a temporary erosion control plan for this project. This plan will detail how the applicant intends to
mitigate for the impacts of wind erosion (dust) and water erosion during the construction phase of the project. The site
will be landscaped at the conclusion of construction of each of the two project phases.
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall install and maintain Temporary Erosion Control to the satisfaction of the
representative of the Development Services Division (inspector/engineer) prior to the commencement, and for the
duration of the project.
Nexus: Mining,Excavation, Grading Ordinance;Environmental Ordinance(SEPA)
2. Air
Impacts: Adverse air quality impacts could be associated with the construction and operation phase of this development.
Construction impacts would include dust from grading activities and exhaust from construction equipment. Fugitive
dust will be controlled by compliance with the temporary erosion control measures. The exhaust from construction
equipment is controlled by state and federal regulations. No further mitigation is required for this specific project.
Operational phase impacts include the heat source for the proposed buildings and exhaust from the vehicles used by the
residents. These impacts are controlled by state and federal regulations. No further mitigation is required for this
specific project.
Mitigation Measures:No mitigation required.
Nexus: N/A
ERCRPT.DOC
City of Renton PM/Department onmental Review Committee Staff Report
Vision Special Needs Housing LUA-97-094,CU-H,ECF
REPORT AND DECISION OF August12,1997 Page5 of 7
3. Water
Impacts: This project is located within Zone 2 of the City of Renton's Aquifer Protection Area. An on-site surface
water detention pond is proposed. The construction of the Surface Water system is subject to the requirements of the
King County Surface Water Design Manual.
Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is required.
Nexus: N/A
4. Police and Fire Services
Impacts: Police Department staff have estimated that they would anticipate 5.52 calls for service annually, and have
noted several areas with regard to safety and security of the site both during construction and operation. Theft from
construction sites is a common problem during construction and Police have advised that proper securing of equipment
and materials, and adequate security lighting have been shown to deter theft. Police have recommended that coded
access entry be installed to prevent trespassing into the building during occupancy. In addition, proper locks and alarm
systems are recommended. Outdoor areas including lighting in the parking lot, along sidewalks, in the play area is
recommended. Landscaping on the exterior of the buildings should not be too dense or high for safe visibility.
Fire Department staff note the with Code-required improvements, sufficient resources are available to respond to the
level of service required for the two buildings. The applicant is required to provide a Fire Mitigation Fee of$488 for the
duplex building,and$388 per unit for the fourplex.
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$488.00 for the duplex building and$388.00
per unit for each of the four units in the fourplex. The Fire Mitigation Fee is due prior to the issuance of the building
permits.
Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution,Environmental Ordinance(SEPA)
5.: Transportation
Impacts: The proposed development would add to the total number of traffic trips generated in the City which impacts
the traffic circulation system. In order to mitigate the impact on the existing City circulation system, the City has
adopted a Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75 per new average daily trip. Calculations of this fee are based on the
minimal trip generation for the use as found in the ITE (International Transportation Engineers) Manual. The fee per
building is $300 for the duplex, and$600 for the fourplex,payable with the building permits.
Union Avenue is the access point for the project during construction and operation. In order to mitigate the impact on
the existing traffic flows by the proposed construction, the applicant should limit construction vehicle movements and
traffic revisions to the hours between 8:30 AM and 3:30 PM.
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per average daily trip. The
fee per building is $300 for the duplex, and$600 for the fourplex payable with the building permits. This fee shall be
submitted prior to the issuance of building permits.
Nexus: Mining, Excavation, and Grading Ordinance, Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental
Ordinance(SEPA).
ERCRPT.DOC
Ciiy of Renton P/B/Department ,onmental Review Committee Staff Report
Vision Special Needs Housing LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
REPORT AND DECISION OF August 12,1997 Page6 of 7
6. Community Services
Impacts: The proposed 6 unit residential development will increase the need for the park and recreation services that are
offered by the City of Renton. To mitigate the impacts of this development the City has adopted a Parks Mitigation Fee
of$354.51 per unit. The mitigation fee for this project is$2,127.06 (6 units x$354.51 =$2,127.06).
Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit the Parks Mitigation Fee of$354.51 per unit (6 units x $354.51 =
$2,127.06)prior to the issuance of building permits.
Nexus: Parks Mitigation Fee,Environmental Ordinance
7. Noise
Impacts: The project site is located adjacent to an existing single family residential neighborhood. Construction noise
can generate an impact on neighbors unless it is limited to the hours of normal activity in a residential neighborhood.
City staff recommend that the construction hours be limited to 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Monday through Friday, Saturdays
as arranged with the City, but no hours in excess of the weekday hours and no site construction with heavy equipment
allowed on Sundays.
Mitigation Measures: Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday,
and Saturday as arranged with the Development Services Division,but no hours in excess of weekday hours, and no site
construction/utilities installation on Sunday(e.g., operation of heavy equipment).
Nexus: Noise Ordinance,Environmental Ordinance
E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS
The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable,these comments have been incorporated into
the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant
X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File
Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report
Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination
must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 1, 1997.
Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on
erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be
reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if
Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there
will no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal
appeal within the original 15-day timeframe.
Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development
Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055.
If an appeal of the environmental determination is also filed with the Hearing Examiner during the same 15-day
comment period,then the Environmental Review Committee will first take action on the request for reconsideration and
the appellant will be notified that the appeal is on hold pending the Committee's decision on the reconsideration request.
The City will notify the appellant/person requesting reconsideration and parties of record and the Hearing Examiner of
ERCRPT.DOC
,City of Renton P/B/Department ronmental Review Committee Staff Report
' Vision Special Needs Housing LUA-97-094, CU-H,ECF
REPORT AND DECISION OF August 12,1997 Page7 of 7
the Environmental Review Committee's final determination. The appeal process will then be continued unless the
appellant notifies the Hearing Examiner in writing that he wishes to withdraw the appeal.
Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in
writing on or before 5:00 PM on September 1, 1997.
Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of
Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton
Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the
Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501.
ERCRPT.DOC
a 0 CITY OF RENTON
..u. . Planning/Building/Public VVorksjff
f.E ih
200 Mill Avenue South -Renton,Washington 98055 fr 4 ;• - 4
M 6 ( -
211
0' :4..4.#140 " - • ,
. *
**as-04 -9,71gtsau01 0 Fcn ;1plgygg
r 7158116 U.S. POSTAGE I' •
--, ,, ,= • ,_,,,, , , i
, , ,,,, •___, ,
LeCatheri
Lot 86 r,-(,-. L
AUG - 8 1997
Renton. WA 98056
'iygzil 75- 0 giv° _
CITY OF RENTON
Engineering Dept
I ADDRESS ‹:"
urbaliiim-ii-i1 ,111i-1.1,111111,1111111111-Av;n1111
x.
+ 7411R4
+
'N,vo�
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: July 31, 1997
An Environmental Checklist Review (ECF) and Conditional Use Permit (CU) Application has been filed and accepted
with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the
necessary Public Approvals.
PROJECT I NUMBEFUNAME: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H/VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME
DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures, each on a
separate lot. A duplex would be developed during Phase I, and a fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The
proposal requires 'environmental'review; a conditional use permit is also required in order to exceed the maximum
number of six(6)residents.
GENERAL LOCATION: South of NE 5th Street and West Of Union Avenue NE
STUDIES REQUIRED/OR
AVAILABLE: Project Application File
PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review
Conditional Use Permit
• Building Permit
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager,
Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 1,1997. This
matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on September 9,1997 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor
Munlcipal;Building,200 Mill Ave.South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development
Services Division,277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in
writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal
before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and '
receive additional information by mail,contact Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager,at 277-6186. Anyone who
submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project.
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION.
DATE OF APPLICATION: •
July 16,1997
I
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 29,1997
DATE OF NOTICE OF.APPLICATION: July 31,1997
Ra..0 ,' a N'Po r^4" _—__.___.... ...- -1-_—_
'
�C0F7�0�4' io.,q' •,,,.�.zi. l o it •... $,�•
C 9 ‘ ELL fr8. =f-%,"4"'• r7:N'F,'•1•. 00 M a H
L.
•
.,
r.. P ..li ' .
_ .. " • •me' µ I •
' . I, 1S' Zia: •a F�. ° tiiI•.j '
' A
.. _ .r• .1 t- m' ... "9- om:
'#" {- Ar. �'`I • °-1 . , 1.
GENMALOT.DOC u; j {b
1 '' f
n, r `Ijo fi 1 1
�,V
© CITY OF RENTON --
Planning/Building/Public Works f . a' 7"--- I" ,del
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ►� ,,,° .
,-- L 31,91 �cd,• Z U 9 ;
`< A u P4EITH •
i
`, 71u��m6 u.S. POSTAGE
GAUG - 81997
C't Kevin & ' . istine Gould
4858 156th eve NE #116 CITY Y OF RENTON
Redmond WA 98^52 Engineering Dept.
©//2/o O
R-ETURN <=-3,,:--7:-.7.41
TO WRITER
1r.r S/ .. .'1:r. :.l i:- -:LI...t i...:t= - j i:.v]- t 91 :
Ar rpic5 UNKNOWN
•
U��Y 0
A
• ♦ ru ♦ .
•
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
• DATE: July 31, 1997
An Environmental Checklist Review(ECF) and Conditional Use Permit (CU) Application has been filed and accepted
with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the
necessary Public Approvals.
*PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H/VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME
• DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures, each on a
'�separate lot. A duplex would be developed during Phase I,.and a fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The
roposai requires environmental review; a conditional use permit is also required In order to exceed the maximum
number i of six(6)residents.
GENERAL LOCATION: South of NE 5th Street and West of Union Avenue NE
STUDIES REQUIRED/OR
AVAILABLE: Project Application File
PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review . , •
Conditional Use.Permit ' - '- -
•Building Permit ,
•
Comments on the above application must be submitted in•writing to Jennifer:Toth Henning,Project Manager,
Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 1,1997. This
matter Is also scheduled for a.public hearing on September 9,1997 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor
Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.,South. If you are interested In attending the hearing,please contact the Development
ServiceslDivision,277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled: If comments cannot be submitted in
writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal
before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and.
receive additional information by mail,contact Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager,at 277-6186. Anyone who
submits II itten comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. •
' •
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF\APPLICATION: ' - July 16,1997
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 29,1997
DATE OF(NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 31,1997
- -.f ' -- -
� -,......-. .-.
,.n o, I 'i.xlo ..a
. .,,i, ..1.,.• ` I o,.I .:y-tom _• .,, <,
E .ti1 .Q Ct :• + t k. •o••' C H A R
- r car( !i Ic�i° •.. .ia i.: '" , $
#�;�# l III:wC -PA'le, 61o:'! .11 ~,tl °:. - • -
ii
V.
.Qy:is11@l'�'F.e Fr�',,!�7�ryfla°eL•) xr,,.. ." •t•
1 —b- 1•;,n2L4: i e::7 B b • N -
14..1.t-I -,14•-' - - t "E3
GENMALOT.DOC � !—.-
a� ;-Y •• 1 •: p1 -.1 'l,I _ ap..:.; i t •i ,� _. •'l Hi
.
© CITY OF RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works ,
9n0 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055
•
MER
, fie
re
/� 6t6 U.S. POSTAGE
•
Yen Thi Ho
686 Shelton 98056 NE
Renton s;.
ZLI'�ERABLE
J : . p ' 111_1,11111;11,,,�1�1 11, 1�1>>.,111.�.�1�I�1�,'lls.l.,11���� llil
He
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: July 31, 1997
I
An Environmental Checklist Review(ECF) and Conditional Use Permit (CU) Application has been filed and accepted
with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the
necessary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H/VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME
.
DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II In two structures, each on a
separate'lot. A duplex would be developed during Phase I,.and a,fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The.
proposal requires environmental review; a conditional use permit is also required in order to exceed the maximum I
number o�six(6)residents.
GENERAL LOCATION: South of NE 5th Street and West of Union Avenue NE
STUDIES REQUIRED/OR
AVAILABLE: Project Application File
PUBLIC APPROVALS: ' Environmental Review:-t
- •- :.Conditional Use Permit '
Building Permit- '
Comments on the above application must be Submitted In writing to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager,
Development Services Division;'200.MillAvende South,Renton,WA 98055 by'5:00 PM on September 1,1997. This
matter ISalso scheduled fora public.hearing on September 9,1997 at 9:00.AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor
Municipal Building,200 Mill:Ave:South.-.If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development
Services'Division,277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in
wilting by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal
before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and
receive additional information by mail,contact Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager,at 277-6186. Anyone who
submits Written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project.
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION: July 16,1997
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 29,1997
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 31,1997
Fr, E,a, .. atr 1 Oal ., •.A S. .
ill1:1 I`
� ! I9 [ ."I
,r:. �.. .� T x '1'.'0 CHAR
e +
l,fry` A -.)-g ",&I :lr °-', :. ;.}-
.. ,
J mo ,f ,q,;1;: . ,7a.^ ;.....:.. q
,. . i 1 . ... ,. 4: •..Rz ;ir g _ tP-n `t1:.� a :f1-.'- .0,,i:�.�.,^.: . ,; r, ... .. .. ....,.. ,
1 f:/,'- �•.. q,e IRS -;S'..: •'
ii ;tp
i.
.. ^i' - . ,. JS.„'C� .1•. ri i_ I : tl •G a :.:701:?„,,, e1-i0 ., , ,. . . •''.Q�I a 5 9r:b y. _
V I , I -,-,i i,A;'. ©,:0 ,• o.del, . h..
-:,xf F.:,�a�".i
' eau' ;b N
,_ I :-.I dal •,_-, o i_
1.' ,r,,o „ :.Y.—; l 1 ' ,aim R:
GENMALOT.DOC I IQ,^ "2.0 lI I ,f— i
© CITY OF RENTON ,.,,_, „�
1,- y it
Planning/Building/Public Works ..ur. ' � � '�
_J Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 t- � - $ •
,. : 02 9 2
_JttL3t9T : , , •
ip
cc m
G. tp
. • ,.=- 718316 U.S. POSTAGE
Kenneth Stahl
14891 Interurban Ave S
--$#19
Tukwila WA 98168
oz_i.2( ro 0,b2G 5
iL S/
r;;..r t.o )1 /-
K AS ADDRESSED .� 1 cl ;4' J v
_ i i i�.... .i i 1 .i t iii [ I i If ii ii i
i.14n1i li011iA! ;J @ E'V V r1 ='1 _/4CU sJtf i in 1"
.f 1. !! �� pp Uzia pGS,f ,�'.. i :15:ii:)i...... :iii i:ii::i:i:::iii::::::e oj.....i•. /
Yi61.<1 51'J TO SENDER A i���/ l—�1 � � i /
+DINIFRY fl+
- NT
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: July 31, 1997
An Environmental Checklist Review(ECF) and Conditional Use Permit (CU) Application has been filed and accepted
with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the
necessary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H/VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME
DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures, each on a
separate lot. A duplex would be developed during Phase I, and a fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The
proposal requires environmental review; a conditional use permit is also required In order to exceed the maximum
number of six(6)residents.,
GENERAL LOCATION: South of NE 5th Street and West of Union Avenue NE
STUDIES REQUIRED/OR
AVAILABLE: Project Application File
PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review
Conditional Use Permit
Building Permit
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing,to.Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager,
Development Services Division;200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 1,1997. This
matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on September 9,1997 at9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor
Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South. If you are Interested In attending the hearing,please contact the Development
Services Division,277-5582,to-enure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted In
writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal
before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and
receive additional information by mail,contact Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager,at 277-6186. Anyone who
sub its written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project.
PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION: July 16,1997
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 29,1997
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 31,1997
-,.•.
• l' %;d' I,
..,,c,:,..4,:kk ! , i
. ..,:_riml, i!i
y J •I, O , :.r
ba'' iiY° �ea o .G.. I a7 ... .,
\itiC 19 , M I Cd ,TAl E-i•.•0. CHAR
q�p 4'� i� 1H'��� .4,,:1.�'^,I 1a.i�N .'li' 11r $
4rpi
. .. ,1 e:II Ico-i 4,W,�l,�'•+.3;�is,4F•I"•.TI .F}, .
.�. . •.::/i° ; Se'II�i`-'1'_.iaM.l' 0- -'.1�1.,11
.0�'.I^•1r: 'I ,..
",7GLa5 f Y..-�( Cj 6 t
C' �I c :1"•1
-:I , I - , .1# 6,%d giliii o f • �'Q
.4 I .M—'''P.''�4t a .i'i .•; i." ' '•-
1T. _tt...;._ -,.3q: %' .-.T;t LK f- . . '
I -I � '- -�r---
,L,,w F(l `, ::..Q 'r- • f.. •
3. 1
GENMALOT.DOC I. .17:-- ��3.�,:1 I nl �,:,, '3,..,_� - %I
© CITY OF RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works 1,4 .., $' ------ate
;`I Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 ft
_ Eg di #
,,' <:` 11, 3 Y9? • -1 : � Z 0 2 9 IN
5 :
`71$3i6 U.S. POSTAGE
JK INC YLE HOMES
500 108 h Ave NE #740
Bellevue WA 98004
1"
l..66/ \\\7 ("'
F____.....,_____--H
DELBVEPABLE = _ �;1v no i1C[-r�ar�-v_ ,mpt -'-i'a AJ's 'i i ie ii f 3 1
ci,H 3'S�rii - coCJ. s.__._.i3.s,. a. -..:. ..._.i: ,...._:x: ........
'., ilii 111111111i 1111111 Mil ii il 1 11111 1 I Mill iii i .
llii IIIIIIi! it !!!Is:, II!!! E! 1! ! !Oil ! ! ISSI! ill 1
7—
..- .
• , ,44... -4, :4, .
---—---- -
- -— _
1 f
e ,
o )
..'
U1fY 0
4. IRA +
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: July 31, 1997
An Enyironmental Checklist Review(ECF) and Conditional Use Permit (CU) Application has been filed and accepted
with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the.
necessary Public Approvals.
PROJ CT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H/VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME
DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures, each on a
separate lot. A duplex would be developed during Phase I,.and a fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The
propos01 requires environmental review; a conditional use permit is also required in order to exceed the maximum
number of six(6)residents.•
I
GENERAL LOCATION: South of NE 5th Street and West of Union Avenue NE
STUDIES REQUIRED/OR
AVAILABLE: Project Application File
PUBLIC APPROVALS: '- Environmental Review :
Conditional:Use Permit:. • „ . '
.. 1 Building;Permit ,• - '
Comments on the above application'must be submitted in writing to;JenniferToth'Henning,Project Manager,
Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 1,1997. This
matter is also scheduled fora public hearing'on September'.9,1997 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor
Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development
Services Division,277-5582;to ensure.that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in
writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal
before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and
receive',additional information by mail,contact Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager,at 277-6186. Anyone who
submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project.
1 PLEAE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I
1
DATE i OF APPLICATION: July 16,1997
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 29,1997
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 31,1997
a
°CFL•- .' I1,' rr..'� . •-y,-..-' .,.T:M:n�i-1'•.0 CMAR
ry g'T ?C.➢r 1,1¢ �, • r r. .:t lip. s •
i:'• ' T.': i •1•;'.•.,r.,::'''', .: ';•'..•,,- ;,gi p..,' ::,:,.!::: i .0;..,; , :Ji;:...,7.,,[.,:..„:,,i-;:o...1:,.;. , ,,,„:;,,, : „: , :i ,, - ,
7 .f. 1 �m ip3 .. ', -_•
© .• • . fin a. .o;,�p • .-.
1, .gI<a�li a fi
is 1":0�:._ . _ ,,. •
may.°,~ — _°�" H
. I TI
� `GENMALOT.DOC I I i i„� )I:I
CITE=OF RENTON
*INC`� ;., Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
July 31, 1997 •
•
• Ms. Susan Camerer
Vision Special Needs Housing
PO Box 3951
Renton, WA 98056
•
SUBJECT: Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home
Project No. LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H
Dear Ms. Camerer:
The Development Planning Section of the City,,of.Renton has determined that the
subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is
accepted for review.;'It is tentatively scheduled for consideration`by the Environmental
Review Committee on August 12, 1997. Prior to that review,you will be notified if any
additional information is required to continue processing your application.
A revised date of Tuesday, September 9, 1997, at 9:00 AM, has been set for a public
hearing to review the requested Conditional Use Permit. The date has been changed to
comply with required comment and appeal periods for the environmental determination.
The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the
Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant
or representative(s) of the applicant is required to-be present at the public hearing. A
copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing.
Please contact me, at 277-6186 , if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
fil •
Jennifer Toth Henning
Project Manager
cc: Property Owners: Mr. Stanley Stone, Mr.Arthur Swanson,
Ms.Barbara Schellert, Ms. Beatrice McNeil
200 Mill Avenue South-Renton, Washington 98055
•
4®* •
NI
NOTICE OF APPLICATION a
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: July 31,1997
An Environmental Checklist Review(ECF)and Conditional Use Permit(CU)Application has been filed and accepted
with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the
necessary Public Approvals.
PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H/VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME
DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures,each on a
separate lot. A duplex would be developed during Phase I,and a fourplex would be constructed In Phase 2. The
•
proposal requires environmental review;a conditional use permit Is also required In order to exceed the maximum
number of six(6)residents.
GENERAL LOCATION: South of NE 5th Street and West of Union Avenue NE
STUDIES REQUIRED/OR
AVAILABLE: Project Application File
PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review
Conditional Use Permit
Building Permit
I •
Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager,
Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 500 PM an September 1,1997,This
molter is also scheduled fore public hearing en September 9,1997 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor
Municipal Building,200 Mill Ave.South.If you ere Interested In attending the hearing,please contact the Development
Services Division,277-5582,10 ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled.If comments cannot be submitted in
writing by the date Indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal
' before the Hearing Examiner.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and
receive additional information by mail,contact Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager.e1277.6186.Anyone who
submits written comments will automatically become a party of record end will be notified of any decision on this project.
•
IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I
• DATE OF APPLICATION: , July 16,1997
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 29,1997 •
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION:q July 31,1997
• qT3 yf�; �I.- .. a l..7 I I.0 ,...;__
i 'i'( rvti I j:. dl t' l .. .. . II
I��tq:_!331 T L " e 7777ff '_
id.
-:.i rh;° e'.;elm
-•(:.••
p.4,,ae i a Hhhr4n,•,,„,J1 \r t
C t o-'
1 .;Ir IL.;_ \
•
.
GEtacLOT.oOC I m I r 0, nI n I fel I.I
CERTIFICATION
I, O,fJIJjf; I• ENN/4/E hereby certify that copies of the above document
were ost d by me in __ conspicuous places on or nearby the descr tied property on
�C airTq'
Siglv
1.4e •
Nilly
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) .
•
• ) SS
COUNTY OF KING ) IIrr--
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that JLnI�IFEd'` i�T I Al A)/'16.'
signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntaryl,, �+tr�fojhe uses
and purposes mentioned in the instrument. • `':•;�6��:.� . ,
Dated: 12/ 1 I 3 r 0.0 Gay\ .I
State df°alVra :Ion;'
Notary Pu in and f he St l- o . ,� E 9 r ;
Notary (Print) MARGARE�T:J:cp LLAR
My appointment expire I$$SL9N EXPIRES 6/9198
INOTARY,OOC
0. iiiIR .
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: July 31, 1997
An Environmental Checklist Review(ECF) and Conditional Use Permit (CU) Application has been filed and accepted
with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the
necessary Public Approvals.
PROJ CT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H/VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING GROUP HOME
DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures, each on a
separate lot. A duplex would be developed during Phase I, and a fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The
proposal requires environmental review; a conditional use permit is also required in order to exceed the maximum .
number of six(6)residents.
GENERAL LOCATION: South of NE 5th Street and West of Union Avenue NE
STUDIES REQUIRED/OR
AVAILABLE: Project Application File
PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review
Conditional Use Permit
Building Permit
Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager,
Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 1,1997. This
matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on September 9,1997 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor
Municial Building,200 Mill Ave.South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development
Services Division,277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in
writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal
before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and
receive additional information by mail,contact Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager,at 277-6186. Anyone who
submith written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project.
I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF APPLICATION: July 16,1997
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 29,1997
DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: July 31,1997
COn- V�, q c T;M:nF,"�'''0 C N A fl
!Ia"`R'j i` ,��87'"''. oi'/.�g� 1 'Y1
Y1 J• ' ;I. :'4
�r jai:701". .�R A_:-• -'a.....tl .•.a.'1',.µ;4 1
•¢'- ,11 �.' ar ." I. •-
..-j.„4.....,.1. ..:.. .. ..,,,
7 I_T
•
f`i - ..,.. , fpa o: •a o,.ap w
— :I r I — .. •.^ni { �A' klCd'C4� - 'art ?—
..°TQ_�' _ _I.
GEN LOT.DOC / / ^3:b 1 4, ! 1 ! .,, " :i'n
CityC. .:_nton Department of Planning/ /PC____ Works
PBuilding
" ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: toelice COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1997
AP
PLICATION NO: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997
APPLICANT: VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING(VSNH) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING
PROJECT TITLE: VSNH GROUP HOME WORK ORDER NO: 78245
LOCATION: SOUTH OF NE 5TH STREET AND WEST OF UNION AVENUE NE
SITE AREA: 0.79 ACRE BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures, each on a separate lot. A duplex
woLild be developed during Phase I, and a fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The proposal requires environmental review;
a conditional use permit is also required in order to exceed the maximum number of six(6)residents.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable ' More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information
impacts impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Ught/Giare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services ii .
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
/ 0 Came,/"--,& uda. - 76 podfic
6 5,e e Mut, ,
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas
where add" nal information is needed to property asse is proposal.
Signature ig Director or Authorized Representative Date
DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93
PROJECT LUA-97-094, ECF, CC-H
Vision Special Needs Housing
City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
(Continuation)
POLICE RELATED COMMENTS
5.52 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Theft from construction sites is one of the most common reported crimes in the city. To
protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked
up when not in use. The site will need security lighting and should also be completely
fenced in with portable chain-link fencing. The fence will provide both a physical and
psychological barrier to any prospective thief and will demonstrate that this area is private
property.
COMPLETED BUILDING
It is recommended that a coded access entry to the main building be installed to prevent
trespassing of individuals who have no right to be on the property.
Each unit should have solid core doors, preferably metal or metal over solid wood with
peepholes and heavy-duty dead bolt locks. The bolts need to be at least 1-1/2" in length
when extended and installed with 3"wood screws.
Sliding windows, including the glass patio doors, will need additional locks;these locks
will need to secure the windows from being pried out of the frames vertically. This means
the locks will need to be placed into the top or bottom of the frames, in addition to any
lock that limits horizontal movement.
Alarm systems are recommended for each unit. The stairways at the complex should be
constructed of lattice or metal railing so visibility is possible through the stairway. There
should not be any solid walls in any stairway that would serve to limit the visibility up and
down the stairs and provide a place for a criminal to hide while waiting for a homeowner
to return home. This also holds true for the fencing surrounding the home: it should be of
slated wood panels and/or lattice material.
Extra security lighting needs to be installed in the parking lot, along the sidewalks, in the
children's playground area, and in the stairways. This lighting also needs to be extended
to the garbage disposal site. Proper lighting will provide the extra security needed when
residents are walking to this area in the hours of darkness. Each unit should have their
individual numbers listed clearly, with the number at least 6" in height of a color that
Page 1 of 2
•
PROJECT LUA-97-094, ECF, CU-H
Vision Special Needs Housing
City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
(Continuation)
contrasts with the color of the building and placed under a light. This will aid police or.
medics who respond to a call in finding the unit they need to go to.
Landscaping around the exterior of the property should not be too dense or high. It is
important to allow visibility. Too much landscaping will give the property the look of a
fortress and make the residents feel isolated, and could also possibly give a burglary
sufficient coverage to break into a unit.
Page 2 of 2
City vt r enton Department of Planning/Building/ Works
ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1997
APIPLICATION NO: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997
APPLICANT: VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING(VSNH) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING
PROJECT TITLE: VSNH GROUP HOME WORK ORDER NO: 78245
LOICATION: SOUTH OF NE 5TH STREET AND WEST OF UNION AVENUE NE
I
SITE AREA: 0.79 ACRE BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures, each on a separate lot. A duplex
would be developed during Phase I, and a fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The proposal requires environmental review;
a conditional use permit is also required in order to exceed the maximum number of six(6)residents.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable ' More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
eV2760
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 10
rr211)re..71Z7A.,
1;918'
S / �eacG� oY �ly
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
oey�
WE;have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas
where additional information is needed < •petty assess this proposal.
45,„ )1/ 4/,1,,>
atur it for or Autho Representative Date
DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93
• City or-Kenton Department of Planning/Building/PUorrc Works �� TO FI DE PT
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEPW�� r�l� U
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1 JUL 2 u u8er
Fvr, '�1�VlAn�tcy1 COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1997
APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997 t l VE[
APPLICANT: VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING(VSNH) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING
PROJECT TITLE: VSNH GROUP HOME WORK ORDER NO: 78245
LOCATION: SOUTH OF NE 5TH STREET AND WEST OF UNION AVENUE NE
I
SITE AREA: 0.79 ACRE BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures, each on a separate lot. A duplex
would be developed during Phase I, and a fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The proposal requires environmental review;
a conditional use permit is also required in order to exceed the maximum number of six(6)residents.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable - More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment - Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Histodc/Cuitural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
4\1 0 r l.704,c16 Vole
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
/0 4
•
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /�
Ql4C/+` D k?oriP.fl g
•
We have re awed this ap• c-tion with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
whe a add-onal informs%• needed to properly assess this proposal.
PAlf • ,
-7 3 /7.1/
Sign tur of Director or A orized •epresentative Date
DEV P Rev.10/93
TY
O
CITY OF RENTON
4, N2o� FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
• MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 30, 1997
TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Planner
"
SUBJECT: Vision Special Needs Housing, NE
FROM: Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal .gh and Union St.
Fire Department Comments:
1. The preliminary fire flow is 3250 GPM, which requires one hydrant
within 150 feet of the buildings and three additional hydrants within 300
feet of the buildings. This is based on the larger building with type 5 non-
rated construction. Variation of the construction type may lower fire flow
requirements.
2. If these homes are to be Licensed Care facilities under the State
Licensed Group Care requirements, there may be additional fire
requirements imposed by the State Regulations.
3. The required fire mitigation fee for the duplex is $488.00 and
$1552.00 for the fourplex.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
City or kenton Department of Planning/Building/P,__ Works
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
RIEVIEWING DEPARTMENT:ahSt t
�'R(M Se�tic:to COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1997
I
APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997
APPLICANT: VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING(VSNH) _ PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING
I
PROJECT TITLE: VSNH GROUP HOME WORK ORDER NO: 78245
LOCATION: SOUTH OF NE 5TH STREET AND WEST OF UNION AVENUE NE CITY OF RENTON
MFCEIVED
SITE AREA: 0.79 ACRE I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A JUL 2 9 1997
I
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures, eacl},QpaungfktU t it•�. .x
would be developed during Phase I, and a fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The proposal requires en '1tbhfih� t� w;
a conditional use permit is also required in order to exceed the maximum number of six(6)residents.
A!. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS
Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information
Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Light/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
Ci CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
v AC-�. ,C 5 ` " / ( -L ( r 14 i IA °`) h
/
14%,e have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /
8 /I
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date /
DEVAPP.DOC / Rev.10/93
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 7, 1997
To: Jennifer Toth Henning
From: Kayren K. Kittrick, Plan Review
Subject: Vision Special Needs Housing
LUA-97-094, ECF, CU-H
EXISTING CONDITIONS
WATER - There is an existing 12-inch diameter water main in Union Ave NE. Two hydrants
exist in the vicinity of the site. One at the intersection of NE 5th Street and Union Avenue
NE, and one to the south of the project site. A City of Seattle 36-inch diameter water line
also exists in a City of Seattle water line easement/right of way that Union Avenue NE is
built over.
SEWER - There is an 8-inch diameter sewer line at the southeast corner of Union Avenue NE
and NE 5th Street. There is also an 8-inch diameter sewer on the west side of Union
Avenue NE to the south of the proposed project.
STORM -There is a 24-inch storm line in Union Avenue NE.
STREETS - Union Avenue NE is paved with some amenities.
CODE REQUIREMENTS
WATER
1.. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $510 per multifamily unit,
payable with the construction permit.
2. Separate water meters for each building is required. A separate sewer-exempt meter for
landscape irrigation is required.
SANITARY SEWER
1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $350 per multifamily unit.
Payable with the construction permit.
2. A sanitary sewer extension to this site from across the street is required. The proposed
force main plan will only be considered if the sewer extension is physically impossible to
construct due to the presence of the City of Seattle water main. An easement or permit
from the City of Seattle to cross the water line and their easement will be required. If the
request for crossing is rejected, the proposed force main will be considered for review.
SURFACE WATER
1. The System Development Charge shall be at the current rate of $385 per single family
site.
2. Plans and calculations for surface water facilities in accordance with the King County
Surface Water Design Manual are required.
VISION.DOC
TRANSPORTATION
1. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. Calculations
of this fee are based on the minimal trip generation for the use found in the ITE manual.
The fee per building is $300 for the duplex, and $600 for the fourplex payable with the
building permits
PLAN REVIEW - GENERAL
1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards.
2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete three copies of the drawings,
two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fee
shall be submitted to the fourth floor counter. A fee worksheet is attached for your use.
However, it is recommended to call 235-2631 to verify the fees as generated by the permit
system prior to issuing a check.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
1. Temporary Erosion Control shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the
representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project.
2. Haul hours shall be restricted to 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. unless approved in advance by the
Development Services Division.
3. Construction hours shall be limited to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, Saturdays as arranged but no hours in excess of the weekday hours, and no
Sunday construction.
CC: Neil Watts
VISION.DOC
•
4-*
(—)1+
r.:%114.
Project Name V5 N F-1
Project Address 500 U vl,o vl 4,/
Contact Person 5 u Su vl (1c<vale✓e V
Address u5 NI-I ) P o. Box 2(5 1 WA 6[g9%
Phone Number ►-1 Z 5 -- 2Z 8 - C 3 5 6 .
Permit Number LvA - R-7- DR q-
Project Description 6rour How e II d''P/' crud fou✓t/
Land Use ype: Method_off Calculation: �p�� � �� CZZD�
er Residential !3" ITE Trip Generation Manual /I
❑ Retail 0 Traffic Study K - Rcv,,ccie.,
❑ Non-retail 0 Other 2,60 -.o 1I.b'I 1.v, a).4(,1
Calculation: Pro)ect suc�gesTS I Itevue.. ,o
t v,p ye vt e v f ivy :0 rr 60 wt wt&it4? (erafel - - d6 dcc,,,„
i=i h : (a) (Z.0) 1.1_ ) 1,1,,-,6v t v Ip S -
Fol Fou, : (4)(2.0) ` rceav Zvrps At $75 -t r+p
i7u 300.0 0 Tota I : qbo.O D
Fouv,o/ . 16)0.00 -
GG
Transportation Mitigation Fee: �(vO.•
Calculated by: IV/ OCe/ZT Date: -2/5o/7
Account Number:
Date of Payment
City or rcenton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT.
� 'SYII.inS ��� COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1997
1
APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997
APPLICANT: VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING(VSNH) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING
PROJECT TITLE: VSNH GROUP HOME WORK ORDER NO: 78245 CITY OF RENTON
LOCATION: SOUTH OF NE 5TH STREET AND WEST OF UNION AVENUE NE
JUL 2 9 1997
SITE AREA: 0.79 ACRE BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A
uvii_ ailitu DIVISION
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:. Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures, each on a separate lot. A duplex
would be developed during Phase I, and a fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The proposal requires environmental review;
a conditional use permit is also required in order to exceed the maximum number of six(6)residents.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS
Element of the Probable ' Probable - More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water LightGlare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
•
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas
where additional Information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
E3/0
Si'natlrre • Director or Authorized Re resentative Date
9 P
DEVAPP.••' Rev.10/93
City ' enton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works
'ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Surfk,e1 U g&-LLY tV COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1997
APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997
APPLICANT: VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING(VSNH) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING
PROJECT TITLE: VSNH GROUP HOME WORK ORDER'NO: 78245
LOCATION: SOUTH OF NE 5TH STREET AND WEST OF UNION AVENUE NE
SITE AREA 0.79 ACRE BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures, each on a separate lot. A duplex
would be developed during Phase I, and a fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The proposal requires environmental review,
a conditional use permit is also required in order to exceed the maximum number of six(6)residents.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS
'Element of the Probable Probable • More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information
Impacts impacts Necessary. Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water Ught/Glare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shon3line Use Utilities
Animals Transportation
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic./Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas
where additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal.
SeI7 k
Signatt�ofof Director or Authorized Representative Dat
DEVAPP. Rev.10/93
/" l;t/4I-6
City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works s e.g. e°'L"'jP -le((.6
ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
iY'N"
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: p'(a,h Review.. wart'ir COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 6, 1997
APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H DATE CIRCULATED: JULY 28, 1997
APPLICANT: VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING(VSNH) PROJECT MANAGER: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING
PROJECT TITLE: VSNH GROUP HOME WORK ORDER NO: 78245
CIiYnr-., nnJOty
LOCATION: SOUTH OF NE 5TH STREET AND WEST OF UNION AVENUE NE
JUL u 7997
SITE AREA: 0.79 ACRE BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A )-, ,
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to develop a group home II in two structures,�� $hiisepArr duplex
would be developed during Phase I, and a fourplex would be constructed in Phase 2. The proposal requires envirafilleital review,
a conditional use permit is also required in order to exceed the maximum number of six(6)residents.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS
Element of the .Probable Probable ' More Element of the Probable Probable More
Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information
' Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary
Earth Housing
Air Aesthetics
Water LIghVGlare
Plants Recreation
Land/Shoreline Use Utilities
Animals - Transportation ,
Environmental Health Public Services
Energy/ Historic/Cultural
Natural Resources Preservation
Airport Environment
10,000 Feet
14,000 Feet
B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS
C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas
where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal.
- � ? 2
Sig at of Director or Authorized Representative Dat
DEVAP - Rev.10/93
PROPERTY SERVICES FEE REVIEV 97- 0 35—d
• . U DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 0 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP
0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ❑
OTHER 3 g
APPLICANT: U'S lo,) .J-'�cl�-,� /(/E g S 1n1(, RECEIVED FROM �,�/'7
. JOB ADDRESS: S /� (,��� 4 4c K _ . WO# (date)
NATURE OF WORK: 6, u,t/p GREEN#
® SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION: ❑ LEGAL DESCRIPTION
❑ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED 0 SQUARE FOOTAGE ❑ VICINITY MAP
❑ NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES ❑ FRONT FOOTAGE 0 OTHER
❑ VESTED 0 NOT VESTED
❑ This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review# dated .
0 PARENT PID#(subject to change)_
SUBJECT PROPERTY PID#092 3O S-5//d 6 f 9/ 45 0 King Co.Tax Acct#(new)
It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice,that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon
development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site
and off-site improvements(i.e.underground utilities,street improvements,etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will be based on current City ordinances
and determined by the applicable Utility Section.
Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Permit
application.
The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees,side sewer permits,r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE
Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WATER
_ Latecomer Agreement(pvt)WASTEWATER _
Latecomer Agreement(pvt)OTHER ,_19 --.
Special Assessment District/WATER v _/
Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER '000 2.. �- (®,6lo9/S.I 1 y(?Q,'Y� e ede l�o.A,4:
Joint Use Agreement(METRO) S' ?-
Local Improvement District *
Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORT
FUTURE OBLIGATIONS Il
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER #OF UNITS/ SDC FEE
O Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) lii Never Pd SQ. FTG.
Single family residential$850/unit x ..
Mobile home dwelling unit$680/unit in park
Apartment, Condo$510/unit not in CD or COR zones x (0 ' '3o(o 0 ,0V
Commercial/Industrial, $0.113/sq. ft. of property (not less than$850.00)X
Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter a,soo GPM threhold)
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WASTEWATER
❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) Lk Never Pd
Single family residential dwelling unit$585/unit x
Mobile home dwelling unit$468/unit x
Apartment, Condo$350/unit not in CD or COR zones x („ $' 2-I 0 0 • OD
Commercial/Industrial, $0.078/sq. ft. of property (not less than$585.00)x
REDEVELOPMENT CREDIT: (New-Old Flow)/New Flow X Above Fees
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SURFACEWATER
❑ Pd Prey. 0 Partially Pd(Ltd Exemption) IN Never Pit —
Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit$385/unit x
All other properties$0.129/sq ft of new impervious area of property x
(not less.Th n$3 0) / 2 300 p (sg6 ,70
2.
v (7 PRELIMINARY TOTAL s$ II/y 3.90 4-�
Signature of Reviewing A ()ray / DATE P4t1s 0� /t �Y v
o
*If subject property is within an LID,it is developers responsibility to check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. a
**The square footage figures used are taken from the King County Assessor's map and are approximate only. (r1
c:/template/feeapp/tgb EFFECTIVE July 16,1995/Ord. Nos.4506,4507,4508,4525,and 4526 1.4.44.
.
E 0 ENT S E& V S O:.::.::.::.:
gun
L I S F...........URR0:.......ND...NG....PROPERTY.•.:.O WNE RS.::........
................................. ....... .. ....................
•
PROJECT NAME: V i5 r 0 c pQ C_ icy( lV QSZ S 4QSI /1
APPLICATION NO: t-vA 9l - 0414 EC.4 CU-�1
The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development
Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development.
NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER •
f Vw 7C .v
N 1IpJ��, .
•I2210\'
•
•
•
•
•
DEVELOPMENT •
CITyO ANNING � , FOli/4
N o
171 tn.
". •
(Attach additional sheets, if necessary)
Y '
•
(Continued)
NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER
•
II
Applicant Certification
/�
I, Sic Sae-R CA-Ytr\i2.4(1L.vf , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property
(Print Name)
. owners and their addresses were obtained from:
❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records
g` . Title Company Records
CC]] King County Assessors Records
SignedL}.21.11)-ev,7206Date , - /7 ' Y
(Applicant)
I '
NOTARY
ATTESTED: ,S bscribed and sworn before me, a No ry Public,Ind nd f2 the State of Wa ton,
residing at on the J ay of " ., , 19 ' /
Signed
-C I (Notary Public)' t I
tv
11
>• �ERTIFI�<�4T10N O .. G :.
er;i y thaE tires of>`,.h•:�' :•:::'r�'`:`;os d '' lca Ion.. .e.e.ma ed to. ...'•��<`h`"�reb a.t a o ces o e o
:��-.•'� �Si ;nec� <> : �<::::::.... . ........ Date.........................
M
•' •. '
:..4....ct`L.ngaat:46.41:§........ ..... ............o0ahe:.i W . tax:<of,...... . ... ............................:.;.;;:1.... . .
. .: .::::::::: .
• .t �•:: ::':/fit. . .';;;:.;;:.:::;;;:;:.:. :>•;.;:::;:: '�:. :;;;:;;;:.;;:.;:.;:.;:.;;:.;:.;::.;:.;:.>;;:.;::.:;:�;:.;;:.;:;.;:.;:.;;:.;;::.::�;:::.:;.;:.;:.::.;::.;:.;:.;:.:<;.;::.;;:.:;;;::.:.;;:;�;:.;;;:.:;.;;;:.;;:.::.;:.>:.;:
•
F ,, `
Iistprop:doc
REvo7/95I ,.YN KAMCHEFF 2
COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99
•For: SUSAN CAMERER
Of : 228-6356
By: Katharine M. Setterfield
206-891-4198 - ° '
Michael & Sandy Arnot Jady Au Edward & Claris Baker
680 Shelton Ave NE 518 Tacoma P1 NE 663 Shelton Ave NE
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056
ozi2icu-- c•ybS %yyy75- oc' 70 c5(/ 7/o6 .- c2.?�
David Bartelds Mark Bashaw Mark & Penny Bunch
675 Shelton Ave NE 505 Shelton P1 NE 651 Shelton Ave NE
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056
C),`17/00 - 0Z SC 75 9yy75• o76 c 6yz /00 -03/0.
Jen Burgess Siu Kit Amelia Chan Pak Tong Cheng
528 Shelton P1 NE 3911 NE 5th P1 5769 Cartier St V6
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Vancouver Bc
ScP-A175- CScc; c/-I q75- Occso Yc'0 /D--ooilC7
James & Ronda Coan Sr. Fred & Judie Crothamel Dan Doan & Thai Hoang
529 Redmond P1 NE PO Box 333 522 Shelton P1 NE
Renton WA 98056 Seahurst WA. 98062 Renton WA 98056
1594/q/75-. 0-zw6 -- 0412 !op_es/0 `/`fy•75 L7rc
Karen Doran Ade & Tammi Franklin Kevin & Kristine Gould
3912 NE 5th P1 3919 NE 5th P1 4858 156th Ave NE #116
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Redmond WA 98052
S-C/4/Z/75- 0 YDv S `/`l k( 7 6- 06 c/ D 09/ o o _:c.:
Charles & Sherry Griggs Deborah Hanson Manuel & Lisa Hernandez
658 Shelton Ave NE 683 Shelton Ave NE 524 Tacoma P1 NE
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Rentonc� WA 98056
0121DO- Cl-lw 6`IL (m•-0270 U 9SIg75. 066a
Yen Thi Ho George & Sheila Houston Larry Howe
686 Shelton Ave NE 667 Shelton Ave NE 145,48 SE 51st St
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Bellevue WA 98006
0142- !CO- C416c (1/ 00 .-tom%0 072- `1133
Mark Hoyos JK INC LYLE HOMES Robert Johnson, Jr.
3913 NE 6th P1 500 108th Ave NE #740 671 SheltonfAve NE,;,,
Renton WA 98056 . Bellevue WA 98004 Renton WA =980;5t
CA2-1 U6 O 67 041Z/00:: 0 V,
William Junjek Sandra Khalife Laura King. ,,
3936 NE 6th P1 3924 NE 5th P1 3919 NE 6th,P1
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA, 98056
' 0`tti l)0_' 0S i c- S61 q if-7 5-- 0� c-) 0 y 2_100-- 06 70
A
David & Erin Kleiber Agnes Koncan Linda Kornegay
504 Shelton P1 NE 670 Shelton Ave NE 534 Shelton P1 NE
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056
eNi-1 75 -0 C-D/7—/eo- °Li 75 ;S -7c, -c> /c_)
Peter & Shui-Hui Ku George Lamb Sally Lamb
3906 NE 5th P1 691 Shelton Ave NE 3619 NE 8th St
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056
`fi 141.7 9 0 cj l 0 -(Z i o C)-- 010 c) f//O -- c:c.O •i 3
LANDBLOOM ROBERT LOUIS L LeCatherine Guo-Yong Liu & Kai-Yi Hu
666 Shelton Ave NE Lot 86 3724 NE 5th P1
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056
O7-100 - c;(-i qyy -76- 0 -b0 "ciy475.-v3.3c
Jeffery & Bonnie Maggs Shawn & Jerilynn Martin Michelle & Neeley Mears
3912 NE 6th P1 512 Tacoma P1 NE 3834 NE 5th P1
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98059 Renton WA 98056
O41 2/co-oLl 7 s— c fLI y 7 S- cY.,%Z �'yy4 75--d-/9L�
Susan Murray William & Shannon Nause Raymond Ng
3901 NE 5th P1 3924 NE 6th P1 6222 S 124th St
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Seattle WA 98178
Cccciq (75-03 D 0412/00--OSo s-- b 7z,305 - Yze/V
Hoang & Rosa Nguyen Lawrence Nieder Guy & Carolyn Noren
3910 NE 5th P1 5363 S Kenyon St 7521 24th Ave NE
Renton WA 98056 Seattle WA 98118 Seattle WA 98115
NORTHWEST PROMPTERS LIMI Vicki Parrish Patrick & Kitty Pau
•
3010 77th Ave SE #201 3918 NE 5th P1 3905 NE 5th P1
Mercer
� Island..{ WA 98040 Renton WA 98056
j�� Renton CW(A� 79805/�6 �'}
0672 ✓05 - ` /�� -' 91 / '" OM Viz % /5- 0 S`/lJ
Long & Chau Huong Pham Sound & Light Puget Kenneth & Kristina Riggs
3904 NE 5th P1 PO Box 90868 3903 NE 5th P1
Renton WA 98056 Bellevue WA 98009 Renton WA 98056
`iL/1f73 'O%Sc0 C.)?l 3ci _- / 74-/L/7s _ c.)/2
David Schellert Debra Schwartz SEATTLE CITY LIGHT
3506 Park Ave N 3902 NE 5th P1 700 5th Ave #2808
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Seattle WA 98104
c34zi0o -0z7 ----- yt/ 7 S - 07zD 01/2106 ._66 YO
Charles Sherrell
1420 NW Gilman Blvd Lai Ngan So Jeffrey & Naomi Solam
#2402 3916 NE 5th P1 516 Shelton P1 NE
Issaquah WA 98027 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056
be-I 2 /oo- G� c=b S' 4-1,1 Is -o:? 0 Vi Lf L/ '7 s-- O ) S 6
J
Kenneth Stahl
Bennett Spencer Jr. 14891 Interurban Ave S T E Stephens
674 Shelton Ave NE #1.9 655 Shelton Ave NE
Renton WA 98056 Tukwila WA 98168 Renton WA 98056
1
;;
VCI11 00:C��-I1 ° Ci4-i i ( °L•-C).2G: L Li 2/w -U u
Barbara Storgel Arthur Swanson Edward Tasca
769 Queen Ave NE 4512 Talbot Rd S 3936 Park Ave N
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98056
`‘ bIIIc= C:;C C(2-3C)5 `j/ C ( C) 1 ZL`• 5- - z _3/
Teddy Ray Thomas Christopher & Lisa Todd John & Eva Torres
682 Shelton Ave NE 3424 NE 7th P1 3828 NE 5th P1
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056
(:) /-(zivQ C,cI60 `n0Ilj o1c , ‘j'c/� 75 -- ��c/ O
p , j�
Laddavanh Vilay James & Heifa Voght William & Kathleen Ward
662 Shelton Ave NE 716 Monroe Ave NE 538 Shelton P1 NE
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056
Ester Weathers Deborah White Donna Whitmire
3905 NE 6th St 659 Shelton Ave NE 533 Redmond P1 NE
Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98056
cC-)C/z3c,5� `r/o/ oz-lz/0o = (-)',5�c.) �,/,y4/ J.S . cc/ina
Geraldine Wilks Elonzo Winston Sr. Robert Wroten
523 Redmond P1 NE 4011 NE 6th St 529 Union Ave NE
Renton WA Renton WA 98056 Renton WA 98059
y11 q75-- v:3v 6ciz 3Dc yz3 . c%Z3 5 io ci
Dori Wysocki Zechun & Chu Sylvia Yang
8418 S 112th St 3922 NE 5th P1
Seattle WA 98178 Renton WA 98056
95GOOl0 CCMg 7S-- oS3 o
CITZ. ,OF RENTON
Planning/Building/Public Works Department
Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator
July 29, 1997
Ms. Susan Camerer
Vision Special Needs Housing
PO Box 3951
Renton, WA 98056
•
SUBJECT: Vision Special Needs Housing Group Home
Project No. LUA-97-094,ECF,CU-H..
Dear Ms. Camerer:
e pment Section t ' Rn.has
subjThectDevelo application is
Planning complete `accordinofghe to City submiofttal requiremento ents and;determined thereforethat ,the is
accepted for review. It is tentatively,scheduled for consideration by the Environmental
Review Committee on August 12, 1997. .Prior to that review, you will be notified if any
additional information is required to continue processing your application.
The date of Tuesday, September 2, 1997, at 9:00 AM, has been set for a public hearing
to review the requested Conditional Use Permit. The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman,
Renton Hearing Examiner, will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of
City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is
required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to
you one week before the hearing.
Please contact me, at 277-6186 , if you have any questions.
Sincerely, __(:)atip\
Jennifer Toth Henning
Project Manager.
cc: ,�Property Owners:. Mr. Stanley Stone, Mr.Arthur Swanson,
Ms. Barbara Schellert, Ms.-Beatrice McNeil
•
ACCPTLTR.DOC
200 Mill Avenue South- Renton,Washington 98055
This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer
. .. :;.;:.;;
.. ::::.................::.........;::<:>:
ii.iii a h:•':,k.>;:.h M:EN;f.. >:;:P::;;;.IC.>:L>:.;:,;;•:.tgli:S.I:0.::,?}?s noini i $ }$ 7 < i$imis o ><
... LL E 5
>:<:;:::;::.;:�:<:>::>::>::;;:.:>:>:>::; :;:;;:;:;::>::>:<:::::>::»:::::>::>><:>::>:>:<:>::::::::::>;»>:::�:: . D V L{�.FM�NT.SERVI.C�S..D.IUI. .. N....... . ...............
::::: ::::::::::::: ::< ::::::: s::i y::::i::i i: i: i i :: :s: :':i:<i:<:: : ::: ::i i::i i'::::„
:r::::: :::: :i:: i:::ii i :lui.i::::::::::::::i i:::::::::::?::
::::::::::::: �nn bb b �+
::::::::::::<:;:::: :::::::::>:::::: .. E ROJECT..INFO . AT.. N
..;.;�:.;:.;:.;:::.: :::.:;•::<•:;:.;:;;,.:.>;;:; .:;::>:�;.:.;:.:.:;<. :::;::�.;:>•;;•.:;:;:::.:.a;.:•. ;:.::.:ad •::;:•.;:�:.
Note>::Itf:there:::is:::mo..re than:>0IJ:e:.egata:.9;wnef4.P..l.eas.e:>atta•ctiia;Ri.i0 tional -
aiotaiized Master:A'pplicatii:ifor.:each:owner PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:
NAME: U S N 1-1- l-OL^'(1 yI•.Q-)z
....S.:_-e_.6,-,i-e-7 = iy,__„' -- .
PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION:
ADDRESS: J ,!`! p 1041
I'1 aU-e- (', E1 I o i- forli. C)(e.e,c_e 14i2. 22
CITY: ,. ZIP:
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
f Ge r;, (4Jraj YTO' - ® 9z36 , S 9/0 6 \
TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S):
C62-7--f/ 6 J -6,"
: ::
:::i€:€>:APP.LI:CN:T`i: if:i:?o`F'er:i h.a. ..o. ...e . ..
?
...:.........:..._::
...
PROPOSED LAND USES:
NAME:
COMPANY(if applicable): • EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
i
ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable):o pL)mc cq.• / .
c__,.....fr,..e .
CITY: ZIP: �l 1!! ii
(c% V EXISTING ZONING:
•
. .
p. ,e_n1-on LdfF .. l (� l ° f997
L), .,.
l'cLOt-'Nrr,�{�-
TELEPHONE NUMBER: Cl r1'OF ' LAlJNir` `
L/2 S r 2 l'-k PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): NTON
CONTACT
..PERS.0 >:i:::::::iii>::::s :::is::'?:::::i::::::::::: •.
SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE):
NAME:
. . . ...,, ,-2.,..;•,..._ (.,t.Scol n. Ca.iyil r s_.(/
COMP-ANY(if applicable,js� PROJECT VALUE:
ADDRESS:',-,, \,.° :- IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA?
F 0 () -.-. (-- ...-..q5 ( . _ .. .
IL) CD
CITY: ZIP:4
p11/ C(-)4 Y O£,61 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY
SENSITIVE AREA?
TELEPHONE NUMBER: IU 0
L/2s — 22-Is- 6356
i
ta. h:>:: e
<::i <:::ne.•c•
TY< Q :::; •�.ee... ..
imi :::.:.:........... ..::::::LEG.,.....::DE.S....: ..O:N:::OF::PROP.....:.............::.:..t..:::::•�::::$..:. ... ......5....:..:::t::::f.::::::.�:::..:..:.........Y..............................:::::.�::
/-49 ° 9
?3°s ,C1� to C� . �yo . Fb S/z cZ%
A-6 iu E q (/z/ • 0.4 s -e. . K4 • cif- - S. •F /* i _v,_, g•.2_ . oi
/.._2 . C.() • k _d._ . l -c4Y�- ,. K �1—S'.. . --
•
:: . I . :. in. ::>:
) ( ..>::: a ::: ha. <: :>:::s t>:>::�:::<::::<><:>:::<:;<:::<:::>:::::>:<::<::>:::»::>::>::: � k:::: II:>: . :�..-.0 to � e .e ee..............:...:.::..:..:.::::::.::.::..C.h.ec.....a.....a. . .�..ca.t..on...t . .. .s..t....x..a . .I. ....:....I.t..::.:..:..:.�::f::w.::.. ±d.:::.:.:::.:::....::.:.:::.::..:.:.g.:..::: m:::.:::::.:.:•..... .:..
_ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION:
_ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT ' ' $
_ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $
. _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ ' _ SHORT PLAT $ 11
_TEMPORARY PERMIT . $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $
_ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ • _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $
— SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $
_ GRADE & FILL PERMIT ' ••$
(NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $
_ VARIANCE $ .
(FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY
WAIVER $
_ _ FINAL
_ WETLAND PERMIT $
ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $
MANAGEMENT PERMIT $
.I
_ BINDING SITE PLAN $
SHORELINE REVIEWS: .
_ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ j
_ CONDITIONAL USE $ !'
_VARIANCE $ F
— EXEMPTION $No Charge _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ' $
— REVISION • $
::<:::>:::«:::>:<:><:: :<:>:<>:>: :>::.«::<:.:;::.::.:::;:.:::.;:<:;::;;;:>:::»><::>::>A»::<<:«<::::»;:: :;»:::QF:F(DAVI.Ti:O.FO:WN.F ..SH.I..:............................................................. . . ...............
evie of 14 8:.''-'' p
I, (Print Name) . G� - k. 5 7.""; declare that I am(please-chuck one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,_the
authorized representativ to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers'herein
contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
• ,I
,-, �TU�' p
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in,
. em id., L' nd
for th Mate of tr./.9..r.Whir"^yi yTir residing at
(Name w resentati Sei "i-e. , on the q day of
2- - -.7M19;TM gliP :c, ,
— w.4!sr, r
(Signature of wner/Representative) / ►i '& /if:- �:,,_
(Signature •iNotary Public) _ j
- 1
'''`>:se> ::: >`>o?>' >' » >` »'gib :><.; t
>>:>:�:»::<>::<�:>»::>:<:>:<:»::>::>:::<:<>>:�:::>:>: ::>:: ::>::::::: »:<:>::<:»:>::>:::<lTb). .. . ...I ...t ... .e..ca.m I. ted.. . � .. ... . ..f.)....
>:::>::<:':><::::::>:: <>i '.::::Files'>IV:urri er'>'::::.:.:::::`<::..:.:::::..: ...:::...:::..<.;::<.; . .:;:<::::: A ::>R <': HP1PO:>;..LL .......pP.......F.P.......T..P.....S.P......0UM.P...:V ...............
>FP D :::S:M';` :. E ': •' ;P :>:»B I?im CP: >€€:<:>€..iii.i':. �> : >[ €> <>s»:.:.m «:o!,..
.. . . .. .......
: ;;<>�::::«:>:>:>::::<>::>;:<:::<::><:::>TOTAL':F:E E.S:::::>:$.»::><:::�::;E<::»:::<.<.:>::;:>:>:::>:::>::::<>:> >::»::>:<T.O:TA L:::.P.O.S..... .. . .. .. . . ... ........ ................................... .......... .
MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96' •
1
J:im{::+r::Gn' :•:':' :G:'::o::`:':::'':'::':':t:u::::: 'v'?:'rif:;:'.. .
�i:';:i:.;:.;:.::.:»:<::: :::?:::>:::::::>::::>:.;:::Yfii:::r.:;:::::::�::.:::.:<;:: :: :::::> :+:>::::;�> ::f:i:::±:::::; ; .: :s..,.i:.:..:.:: ::•:.:::;::;.::>:,:.::•.::•.:'.>::.::::.>:::.::.:�>:.:.::.::...:: ::�::::''?:' 3<'f'si::::::::::i::::::i':::i::::' ::i::�:::::::::: +:: :::::'::::: ::::: ::::::1
=DEVELO:.._:M:ENT SERV;C.;:.;;:.,..;.:...;:.VISION > >> ' € >'>'< >> > »� >><€» »» < >>>` < <:<:>::>::»::::::>>;�;<:::::::::»»»>::>::>::::>::::>:: ::::::<:<:: :�:::>:<::>:::::»::::»': :<::::«:>:<;«:::...... . ... � .PM ..T.S. R...f.CES..D.I.U..I. .. ...... .
><i:>PRO� .:•:.>>:.:<.IN::F.0;RMATto.>:Ri >`<>> <€ <>:`>:
::::'::;:. ;:.>::>::»::::»>;>::>::»;::.:>: P T> :::: � W ER S �><«`:;<::<'�':<';:�:��>:<<�<<�<> : :>::::»:>:<::>:>:>:�::: . N O . MATI.O.N.....
Note :(f tt'ete fs'moretl an:one;le9al;ow.ner :please;attacl:;ar additiopaI
notarized::Master.:Appliction;for..eaci owner." . .. .::. . . >: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT/ p� NAME.::_..
•
NAME: V S IV (+ ."l :D:c4 ( rI:
i? 7,i lit-tA_ St_t3'-o-il-er-N. . .
PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION:
ADDRESS: /?io
4/51 .2 .T6L1-117,--f- gel S. 5 X ni © �,
C ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
• (A) a - ?*d 5� 09Z3o c7 /DL
1 �
TELEPHONE NUMBER: . EXISTING LAND USE(S):
'1' S -.... 2...26 --7 '2D...........
N
>APPL CAT (foiiNertha .owner > >> <
PROPOSED LAND USES:
NAME: .
V 510 4- Fo L� 'V l4-(:
COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
•
V----- °•. ,
ADDRESS: g PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable):
CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: .
r
•
TELEPHONE NUMBER: /
I/25 — ^� 7S_ 6 , CJ 6 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable):
...... ..ON.TA. .....PAR. .. ..111...............:n::::::.:...._:..::. •
SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE):
NAME: y� �lC��
�j 2
COMPANY(if applicable): •
PROJECT VALUE:
• 1 IV ObobI o© e�
ADDRESS: r IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER`^P ROTECTiON AREA?
q 1
CITY: ZIP: ECE _h=• . -.>7 ,',ti .
l) .'11\ IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHrR_TYPEVOF iiNVIRONMENTALLY
�(/1�(7 W/4 � SENSITIVE AREA? i
/ ,11.1L,: 'I 6 199/- .(a f�
TELEPHONE NUMBER: J/ -7 • /,.; / L 0 `-'\��,'
2 S— 22 ' 6 (6 ,0t VELOPMSENTPLANNING ,:i ""'`
. II.
><::<�:><::::>:: ::::>:<:>::>:>«>.>::::>:<:::>:::: . . .«, ; :.:. .N;..O'F:>:P:R.dP.ERTV::>:(.A't.�.::.C...:::::$::::p..
: LEGAL DESK:; : : :.::::: : ::::::: :::. ...:,.............. $.:::.:.:.:....:.........,......,:,..
•
Lam" : 612,3o S_ 1z . .':/0 • . E -//O. ?L PT 4 S •
?..._
6---( sy. . 1 N.:: ,-)'/.. e.1:1 . 4 , g e I,O i s F yg _,&2)_,6 s-. 5:. -.
.. .. c/ .RATS
I
vvi I.Idet a fea§•••:4<> > >>>> iguE
..... .................
.... ......... .......:........:...... :. I[.>:a II. �IQr;I..:$ :e.s:<:�Ia.a.t;::a. :.P:.Y.:::::.::4...Y..,...:..::,...,..::...................,
:::..<;::«:>::«>:>>«:>::>::>::»�<<::::»Ch.e:.c....k.a:.:�::..:p.p.:c.a.:.::,.:.........YR....................... P . . .
_ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION:
_ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $
_ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT . $ •
. _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $
- _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _
_ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $
_ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $
_ GRADE & FILL PERMIT .$ ,
(NO. CU. YDS: 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $
_ VARIANCE $ •
(FROM SECTION: ) — PRELIMINARY
_ WAIVER $ _ FINAL
_WETLAND PERMIT $
— ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $
MANAGEMENT PERMIT $
_ BINDING SITE PLAN $
SHORELINE REVIEWS:
_ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $
_ CONDITIONAL USE $
_ VARIANCE $ '
— —
EXEMPTION $No Charge ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ' $
REVISION • $
•N•••E •R•.S•••H..•....
I, (Print Name)A /A'!/k' D. '4(W/t4 Lclare that I am(please check one)vt)owner of the property involved in this application,_tha
owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers h rein
authorized representative to act for the property
contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
ATTEST: Subscri ed nd sworn to before me, a Notary Public,in and
, �� for Sta a of e" . residing at41
Na e o caner/ eprese .A.te)
19 , on the/C ay of
� C
(Signature of Owner/Representative) ,¢„�
(Signatur of tar Tic)
.,a,-/-1.&71 )(ffitg, iii1-00
::: i!'..::. ..i ..:.: e.. .. .:..::::.. . '::.,.:. .: .::.;:..:.: ;::: ::.::. :::.;. • •.:;:•:.'::::::.:.':;:<;>:::':::::<::> ::, :V M P;'•::•:V::::;:>:::<>::;<:::::•..:
:.: ::::.::::. +• .: :::.:.:.. ... .::.:.:. :..:. :.:.::.:::::.. :.:::;,; . .::::.R::.:. H PL::::.G _ LA...::.P.P.,.....:FP.:::" �'::::S:P. .:R..::.:..: :<.:::;...::::::::..:. .::.::::..
:::.:'.:::.::.::............�'.......•:.::.:.:::::::::::::.;;:•:<•:.::;::.:::::.. . D::::•:' ::....FP.U......;::: .f.V.....S.M.E::: :M.HF::::::>:> . .......................A.................................
':::::.i:i':v:'•:::::::•i}':h^:�v:':.• :C.}'•i'ir.:':.isti•ii:S:4:•i:tii:i::{:.i::i•:i:ti<•:i: i:4:•`:.::...:
is�::..+i:}y:ijii:::i;i}:v:t:i::::iiv:. •. .. i:i';i .;.::tii}�:?`�:}::::;i:;i..:;:`:l•i:'>iisiv::>:.'::::::::'':::•:::::':�;':'.i..:,.
..:::::::: ::..::::::.::.::.�::;;:.;..': .. ::: . ::..$�::.�:.:....:::..':.:.:.::,:..:::.:::.:.::::::,::;;:.�..T..QTALI:�:.O:S:T::.:..:........ ::.. :::: :: . .. .: :...
...::. ....
::.:.. ........ :::::
....... ...............
MASTERAP.DOC- , REVISED 9/96 P
..........
........::::.::
TY ,F :.E.
.:.,:;r,S.tt:..::rE E E'' E E iiiiin EEE E i iiim' E E E yy i > » EEE :.;iio E E ''
':>:;:.:•<::::«.>::>;>;::::>::::::>>:<:>:::>:::;::>::>:::>:>:::<:>::�:>:::>:::>«:::»::::>:::::<::::>:>::;»<:::<:::::>:: :DEVE�:..:I'MENI`<SE.:vICES�:DII/.1. .1.0.N. ........
OJ O . M . .
'.':.;:. :�::;;;:.;::;:.;:.;>;:�:.;;:;.:P:RO PER ..Y..O.....N........ . ........................................ ......... ....................P............ .....................R.....A....I.. .......................:....:..::.:.
ttac.:•; ::•.taddiional .. .. ......
..Note»:if:>there.*:::r:::::[;.e than:o►?.8:1e9a1»a.^':.qe,(#:::..leasatt.:F.h:< rt.::. *t: : ..:.
nota ized::Master:•Application:':for.aa6h:`o.Wner ' ,:._. ::::'>?>>%: :>::> PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:
NAME: V 5'k ilt FOCA-f?iJL V'
•
PROPERTY/PROJECT•ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: •
ADDRESS: i aV e_ IL
350 PcILaJ . X Ll v� rove
CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
• 0
C1C-1(11:43Ne\ /�.�..�A 0 923 O s Rio 6 -.
TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S):
::::>€:::::/.?�PP:LI:CI:�N:T>' if`otlie:riNano:wn:e..:.)..:.:::. Il.:
PROPOSED LAND USES:
NAME:
N . FDw ?'f�) .
.
COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: .
ADDRESS: 0. q G
v C a ( J PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable):
CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): m/ .s 2 Z r G-3 5� •
•
SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE):
NAME: •
*.c�Sce.,n �ica.m.e. r.s- �' • � .y'Z lCa�{© �S�
COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: $.
6 ©nf ©dam •
ADDRESS: •
IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER,PkOT.0TION-AREA7
PCB Cb als / • . EEC D: . J..
CITY: ZIP: • '• - I r ) _-
2 vi.4l� ,(� ?-ci 5 SENSITIVE AREA7 IS THE SITE TED IIN�ANIY RT1 YPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY
TELEPHONE NUMBER: DEVELOPMENT PLANNIIf ' r ‘; '.\`'' `'
S' CI l(OF RE"NTON
;;: ;:n> : _EGAt D ES :,.. IO 1V:.:.:.. E P.R OP.E....R...T...Y....: -A.... fa.:: i:<s`:'e... e...>`5h...:.e....e ii::....::.:......;..<..."...'qe......s.......sa.......yY': >:::...`....>...:>...:?.?.:..i..>.....€:...:..:......:'.....<.:.»
�- arz3°S-- Oa !0 'G , -�o- 6 F-6 y� ...
`�I s'
•
r2,,, al -N_. . k ./;' s . .. )/c6, . 4.. sE /4 e'-J-,6 s- z- --ee •
i4D tZe,/ ' ' ..:)-42--2- cm e6 T S
...................,........................................... .......:...r...........................
...........
:.::.......... ......................................:.:::::::::.:::::::::::::::.•..............T....P.E...O.......�.........:I.GAT.::.:.:....::.........................................................................................................:..,.. .
..... .. .................. ....... .. .....
:W I :: r.m)n. ::f .f .... I.. et ee
::>::::>::::>:<::: »>:::<::<::«:»::»::::>::::«:::>::::: .:;: I ..a.....l is I :n>€::t'. :e a �a .0.t. ...s ta...#........�........ . ...........................s.,..»:>::>:::::>:: ::::>::::>i:>:<:.......�:.. ....
.::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::trhe..c..k...:a..l.:�...: :..::::�..a:t::Q...�..Yp..:s::rt..:�:.:�..:.::pp:.:.Y...:.,...:...:Y.....:.:.....::......:........:.......,.::....:....::::..:::...:..:..:,....:.:..:..... ...,.........:,...:......,
—ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION:
_ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT ' " $ i. •
_ REZONE $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ . 1
_ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT $
_TEMPORARY PERMIT • $ _TENTATIVE PLAT. $
_ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $
_ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ i
_ GRADE & FILL PERMIT • $
(NO. CU. YDS: . 1 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ 1 ,
_ VARIANCE $ •
(FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY
_ WAIVER $ • _ FINAL - 1
_ WETLAND PERMIT $
ROUTINE VEGETATION
— MOBILE HOME PARKS: $
MANAGEMENT PERMIT $
_ BINDING SITE PLAN ' $
SHORELINE REVIEWS:
_ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $
_ CONDITIONAL .USE $
_ VARIANCE $
— EXEMPTION $No Charge _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ' $
REVISION • $
::::AF:FIDpVIT<:.O:F`;OWN
A 964ELI, Kr1 '
I, (Print Name)LJ1 R 'A--F+ ,declare that I am(please check one) the owner of the property involved in this application,_the
authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers Fllerein
contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
I
. I
ATTEST: Subscr'bed a sworn to before me, a Notary Public,in a d
�/� �� q � //� for.," St a of . residing residing at
(Name of Owner/ epresentative) ,9 , on the/o day of ,
/ 7L 1 i 40
(Signature of Owner/Representative) / iArii
i ignature.,of o r u•I' ) U`
Dd
° >:>;::>:;:;.ipiii:<:><>:> ::»<<:;<.>':>::pliiiipiN:>:»:giBii<:1ii.: ::.. Is::s.ectl . ° o::b:e<'co:0 I. to ..py itx§ .ff .:ili :>` i$ > > »' >' ;iii$< ><:.;.;:.;::.:...;:
• :>::LLA>>::>PR:> FP< <TP::s:: P:><:RVIVI.P`:>:<V.::> `» >; :.::::..
.Ei.SP <> ' C.P.'' :.:iiiiEi s;:> »>> <> ' `: <::>:''::' >'`<:;
^.:i•:::::•:::::::4::::v::.:.:::.;T T Y::::. :::: :::... w..:.: :v::".:NI L:h:v+.•i:+:N:vv^:•: { .
: ::::::.::.:::..:..I:OTAL..F.E.E.S....:.5.:::::..:..:.............. :.:.:.�::::..::::::.: TO:TALP.Q.S.T.AG. :.::.:.:4 .:...:E..:..�::5........................:::. : .. ::::::.. . . .
MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96
t
�' W
ITYf
:.;:: .;:.;:;;:.:;;.::.;::::::::::.::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::.:....::.
i >:::::;::.;::»::::>:::>:;:>::>:.<>::::>::::>::::::::::><::::::>:::<::<:»::::>::::<::::::: ::>:<:<:>::::<::::::<:::::>:......... . ogp. m:ENT..S osageoi.oIUI.SI.ON.........
•
•
•
•
•
11:01:lig:1111:11:11:11:11:!...!!!!!:::!!!!mAsTie:RIAppt ;.'` .;I O> `:g ? > >> <<» ''>`'> `f ><"9":
................
::i:i::::::::::.::*::::i:i:i:i:i*,:i:i:x:x:i:i:iti:i*:.:.:::::.:::::::,.::...::.:.„,:.:..:::.::,:.,„.:::,.:::..::::..,::,:.:::::.::::::::::„.....:::::,..::::,:::::::::.:.:.::::.:.....:::.:.::.::::..................:.
:::>:::::>::::>:»::::>::>::::>:::::<<:>:::: :: T:: : . R S <pagio > >€g .::>€<:;>:;:>;::>::€:>::::> ..... OJ ..I.N F.O . M . T . .
.............::.:...:::.:::::: :.PRO.)'.�.RTY::.Q.W.N�.... ...)..............................:....... ..........................:..::.:.P..;..:.... ...G�................�.....A....I.Q• ..N.:::: ::::::. :::. .. .
No.ter;:):f the;re:IS.;more;thon op legal;.owner4 p(eas.Q attacl}:;ar addi;opal
nota ized:Mast'WANjilrcatioriIiiiieach:ownei :.' :••'>: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:
NAME: O SIL)If O t,k- I.e.)C
CQa Vi 11)-
• PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: yy �
ADDRESS: 6'X 2 � I
u - v-C
Si ._— (Lii t' ,� ' n Yue , , s.f- N ,C 5Et.4- 0114 r�,A— i E Fu c�'
CITY: ZIP:
KING COUNT ASS©SSOR StACCOUNT NUMBER(S):
..n1(14) nitd . -- POS7 Q 1 2-3oS- ?if 69._0 -7
TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S):
2/2 S - 2-26--Nyy? I U A
gageminiAPP:ODANNAJE414.0.fithWJEd. .n. .. ......:::.....::..
PROPOSED LAND USES:
NAME: D C.L n/-e
COMPANY (if applicable): • EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION:
•
ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable):
CITY: ZIP:--.. . Q irts(-0 1r\ (dCS Pi- qr 0.c-: 6- EXISTING ZONING: rs
Ki o
. - . .
, . ..
. .
. . .
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
`[ 7 C T &-6?�S4 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): S.4'M4
J ✓>:.>: :,,,. ,Midi ` ini <>'?«< s •.
SO>;>; ;> .>« <><O:O.N:T.A........PAR . ..N..........................................
. .,:.::,:.:::::.::......,:......................... ............................................................
SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): /�t�
NAME: S� • l`\/ arl vp
Jov CO-vn Q 11.
COMPANY(if-applicable): PROJECT VALUE: #LI I '1 r di t�
O CD 0
I o�
USf111+ ''(-.,. 1 61997
• ' OEUELUicl't ::''P Cat,
ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROT21 613,4#ETi�4NNt�IG
P CB k�a� 02 l ` ; =
-
CITY: ZIP: 0, i"
L '1 ��L : IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF`bziviR,OilM (itilktii.fe
R anioni TA V 4- n v SENSITIVE AREAS �iVT0/
TELEPHONE NUMBER: ' 1U a •
`/'5— 22 3 56
: ::<:::><::>::»:<:>:<:::»>::::i:>:><>:>:LEGAL..DE:SP ::O.N<:nF..P.R PER.T..,Yk.! . tt. . :. ..,.. . :::s.:.....e#..................O..:::.:::::::Y...........................:.::........
a
&C Nam; Yq 0,1 a 1 . S 1, 4- ize/ L
. /in . .. .. .
111. _ . .
. .
..........................::.:::..:::...:::: .�:.�:..:..:...:................. ...... . . . .PE..O::..AP:P�,I:CA71.Q.1�...&;....E�.S:...... .. ....................:.:;...:..:....�: :::::.:. ::::.::::..:�::::.:::. :.
:<>>"f:<mw) .. a er .fe.e's''<»>>< :> »> ><,.:.'::.:..::: :
k€al[�a.:.:::..11:<::. ( .. .,,.f::.:.:;e t . � .l. .....G.4t. ...sta..:.f..........l...d. .t ...m.....e.... .. . .......... ..................:. :.... ..
::.:::.::.::::;::::<:::::::::':::.;.::::;:<.:::.:.:h:ec.,:<::;.:.::�<..:P.P..�:c.a.:.::on..:...Yp..:...............;«..;,.pP.:.Y..,.;...,....Y.......:.....:.....::.......,......::.:. : .,::,,. : ..
iii
_ANNEXATION . $ SUBDIVISION:
_ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ j
_ REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $
. _ SPECIAL PERMIT . $ _ SHORT PLAT $
_ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _ TENTATIVE PLAT. $ r
_ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _'PRELIMINARY PLAT $
_ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ — FINAL PLAT $
_ GRADE & FILL PERMIT • .$
(NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ G
_ VARIANCE $
(FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY
_ WAIVER $ _ FINAL
_WETLAND PERMIT . $
ROUTINE VEGETATION
— . MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ i
MANAGEMENT PERMIT $
_ BINDING SITE PLAN $ I
II
SHORELINE REVIEWS:
_ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $
_ CONDITIONAL USE $
_VARIANCE $
_ EXEMPTION $No Charge _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW •• $
REVISION • $ I
—
1.
:>::::::>::>>:::::>:»:::::<:::::>;::><: >:<::<:::><::<::»::>gi:<:<::»:>::::<::::;>::»ii:<::::::::::: ::>:«<:::>:::<:<:::><::AF:F'rDAVI.T»0.N:O:WNER.S . ...............................................................................
I, (Print Name)ep4f/`fCe,.,/eC Q�et l ,declare that I am (please check one)4he owner of the property involved in this application,_the1I
authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein
contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
i
�/� ATTEST: Subscribed and swot vbefore me, a NotaryPublic, in' nd
e 11/C� �-/v L i / for the State of W '`'""'vre iding at Tw 1
(Name of Owner/Representative) •�E ��� ^� , on the ��day of
a,-7,1:-,.,,,._.,4 7 e4-2_,,1
(Signature of Owner/Representative) —ii !
ti\'ASig'rr ture o Notary Public)
,k, r vvL VCR J. /V t C.J.L Al- 1 AD
�::C
:::::::::lT. ..t ... .e..co. I.e�e�::b. . . ... .. ..f.)..................................
:.;:.:::;.;:.;;;:.:.:;.;:Clt:::::FII.�:.:N.umber...::g. :. :. ......... .....:...... ..... :<.;SP.�<::>ki:::< : . •:... .......pP.......F.P.......T.P..... .P.;::;::RUM.P:::::::»U:>::>::>:::>«:::>::::::..
..........................................................................AAD.....W...........U........S.M....M/J.Ec<..:Nl.FkEN...... ..................C...A.......................................................................<........
:.:.::.:::.:.:::::::: . TQTAL,.:F: E.S..: :5. . . .. .. ..:;::;:. .:.:...:.::..:. :. 'O:TA... PO.SlA,G...::...R:Q.1/...IDE. .. :.S..r '... 1'. ".: :..::::.:...::..:::_:::.:: ...:. .
MASTERAP.DOC' REVISED 9..96 ��p,•��.��-
JUSTIFICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING
VSNH is requesting a conditional use permit for the following reasons:
1. Since 1990 Vision Special Needs Housing has provided transitional housing for the homeless. In the past years,
over 150 homeless men,single mothers,and their children benefited from our assistance,yet,in King County
alone,nearly 14,000 single women and their 24,000 children were refused shelter because there were no beds
available. Children make up the largest population of homeless individuals. Daily we receive applications,
referrals and telephone inquiries we are unable to accommodate due to lack of space and our experience working
with the homeless leaves no doubt that we are serving a significant need.VSNH currently runs a program for
homeless single mothers and their children in Renton. Our records show that 63%of our residents have come from
Renton. 88%of our residents have come from South King county. There is a need for housing homeless single
mothers and their children in Renton.
2. An essential part of the VSNH program depends on the accountability that the mothers have with living
with another adult. We believe that this accountability increases safety,effective communication and
problem-solving skills,and decreases the chance for child abuse and/or drug or alcohol abuse. The design
of a shared kitchen,living and dining area allows for the accountability needed to run our program
effectively. Because of this program requirement,it is very likely that sometimes the number of adults and
children living in one unit will exceed the permitted number of six unrelated individuals living in one unit.
For this reason we are asking for a conditional use permit. Any approach to the community that can allow
for as much confidentiality as possible of our program would be greatly appreciated. Many of our
residents are fleeing domestic violence and require low profile living.
3. We believe the proposed location is an excellent site for the proposed facility considering the population
that will be housed in these units. The sites are close to shopping,services,public transportation and
Renton Vocational College.
4. There should be no adverse effects on adjacent properties.
5. VSNH proposes to build a small complex in two phases. The first consists of a duplex. The second
phase consists of a fourplex. The proposed sites are zoned R-10 permitting duplexes and fourplexes.
EnFiVD
cri
oacVELUVML:N T PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
11111)
PARKING MODIFICATION REQUEST
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING
Vision Special Needs Housing is requesting a Deviation from Standards for required number of parking
spaces for the proposed project.
Our proposal is to build.a duplex and a fourplex totaling six dwelling units of transitional housing for
homeless single mothers and their children making less than 30%of the median income. The duplex
would also have an attached 200 square foot office area to service the residents. The requirements would
require 13 spaces. We propose to provide seven spaces and one accessible space totaling eight spaces. We
put forth as evidence to support our case that the amount of parking we propose will be sufficient to serve
the residents of this project:
1. Low rate of car ownership- Our experience with very,low income residents of this type of housing do
not own as many cars as would higher income families. Over the past three years,it was found that only
one-third of the adult residents in our current single mothers program owned a car. The proposed project
would house only female head of household families.
•
2. Mass-transit service- The site is located directly on a metro busline. Vision Special Needs Housing
provides bus passes to residents who need them.
3. Nearby services- The site is within walking distance of grocery shopping,daycare and services.
4. On street parking available on project's street frontage- The project fronts on a street for a total of 160
feet. This frontage could provide on-street parking for five cars and could serve as overflow visitor
parking for the proposed project on unusual occasions of extreme parking need.
Vision Special Needs Housing is committed long term to owning and operating transitional housing. We
currently have a contract with the State of Washington for 50 years. Also,the design of the home is
specific to the population we propose to house in the units. For these reasons,it is highly unlikely that the
proposed facility would change to market rate housing in the future.
We hope these points are satisfactory evidence to support our case for eight parking spaces instead of the
required 13.
Thank you for considering this request.
Sincerely,
Susan M.Camerer R E C F @
Program Directors
Ji. L 1 6 1997
OEVELOPvMcNT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
110 41111
VISION SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING
PROJECT NARRATIVE
VSNH proposes to build a small complex to house homeless single mothers and their children for up to
two years. The proposed site is located at 5xx Union Ave.NE,in the Renton Highlands. It is made up of •
two nearly identical lots. Both lots are 82.42 X 210.86. The site has no current usage, improvements or
special features. There are no existing structures that might have views obstructed as a result of the
proposed project.
VSNH plans to build two buildings in two phases. The first phase consists of a two story duplex with an
office area on the south lot.The duplex will house four to six families and be approximately 5,000 square
feet.The building will be a maximum of 25 feet high. The south lot will also contain eight parking spaces
for both buildings. Completion date of the proposed project will be January 1999.
The second phase will consist of building a 9,200 square foot fourplex on the north lot to house eight to
twelve female head of household families with two families sharing one unit. Both buildings will wrap
around a large secure play area for the resident children.
Access to both properties will be from Union Ave.NE to the south lot. Lot coverage for the proposed
buildings is 21%. Total proposed impervious surface is 39%.
Proposed off site improvements are a sewer extension and manhole. Existing curb cutouts will be utilized.
RECE
JUL 1 6 1997
,.)EVEELOPcViENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
i
IT1('`Q .. . E•
R N
E E .>PM:::•N ER CEISO:.:s i ? ><immai ;>' ;> '' i imi
• �::::>:::>_';:':::::::>>:>::>::><::`:<:>:<`::«:>`><>:::>:> >>:>�::><>:>:�':»DEV LOPIVIENTi'SER..[ ES.DIVISION...........................
ENVIRONMENTAL
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: •
•
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies
to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making'decisions. An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the
quality of the environment. The purpose of this.checklist is to provide information to help you and the
'agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can .
be done) and to help the agency.decide whether an EIS is required.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.
Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of. your
proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most
precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each.question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,
• you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need
to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal,
write"do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary
delays later.
Some, questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark
designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can
assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help _describe your
proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to
explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be
significant adverse impact.
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not
apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
•
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on, policies, plans and programs), the references in
the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal,"
"proposer,"and "affected geographic area," respectively.
• . RECEIVES
JUL 1 6 1997
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
•
l.
1111
I
Environmental Checklist
- A. BACKGROUND
c5 1 5i7t
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: V iS i U �1 P� �'10. (
2. Name of applicant: VI s,0 5? -G l cam` Q,2 �-s 1+0�` 5 t rt
1
contact person: 0 C3 a-,C a `�5�- .
3. Address and phone number of applicant andn p n. P ce v o S
(03 56, •
4. Date checklist prepared:
requesting checklist: C
5. Agency r � , �j_ \2
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including hasing, if applicable): p) x.. J (�
Sa�f.. 1 `� q 9� P. by
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion,or further activity related War connected ' '
with this proposal? If yes, explain. —( � tu,-b p � �P�, /1cx_073-1 ,
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,
directly related to this proposal. N6.t.lE
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals
directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 140.
•
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. •
�E%t/E(L eNc-r- t-mtotl , eOluotJ e -vktT, evt4{otTtot-AL. USA
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of
the project and site. ••
•
Environmental Checklist
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
-range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,'provide the range or boundaries
of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if •
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist. 5 CJYu-�1 CIA-)-e-
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. . General description of the site (circle one rolling, hilly,.steep.slopes,-mountainous,
other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) -1-4 g_ tS A
A. 3'4' PCC 12rAgi t1S E 14- A,-w 14 ' E. STg r
Stu
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,.
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them ,and note any
prime farmland.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe. 1,10
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill. a S o o C y� -�
j21...e. _64 cr<Y\ COYY1-elYLQ--r g'06z,
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally
describe. pc,
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 37 o/D
3
N
Environmental Checklist
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
2. AIR
• a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal
I (i.e.;dust, automobile,
YP P P C
• :.:odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and.when the project is completed? If
..any,-generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. -r-‹vp,c
Nate61 G isstocis ?ct,l.vD 744EN Not-le (d eet-Alkiv-rt
b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that•may•affect yourproposal? If so, •
generally describe. 1.1.0
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: t-1ot-sr
3. WATER
. . a. Surface Water:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,-wetlands)?• If yes, describe type •
• and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. 40.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N•o •
•
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from
• surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material. P4ot-I•E
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
9
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No,
5) • Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan.
4
.. �i
•
11011
Environmental Checklist
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No,
•
•
b. Ground Water:
1) - :.Will.ground water be withdrawn,.or will water be discharged to ground water? Give
- . general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. too.
_ 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other
... sources, if.any (for•example: Domestic sewage;4industrial,•'.containing:.the:following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of1he•system;the-number of .
such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of
. animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. cJat.LE
c. Water Runoff(including storm water):
1) . Describe the source of runoff. (including storm water)'...and.:method'.of.collection and
disposal, if any(includ'e quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?•.Will this water
flow into other waters, If so, describe.n - � -- �,w,� 0._6.( Ca-02.9-CZ"d1 C2-"e t/ d .
{f
2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? .If.sa.,genprall'!describe. NO.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if
any: oft oz
rei-9A
4. PLANTS
N S
•
a. . Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
✓ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other •
✓ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
✓ shrubs •
✓ grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,skunk cabbage, other
water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
✓ other types of vegetation —wer✓t7s •
• '
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
P1-4,4( M t,t. es. t=, 4v tzabovcs 1-1-W Ler'ac 0 F -0203
5
•
Environmental Checklist
•
c. List threatened or endangeredspecies known to be on or near the site.
p
d. . Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measuresc to preserve or enhance
• vegetation on the site, if any: �� /.`�RAw u.-Qrds,
J /1
5. ANIMALS
a. •: • Circle any birds and animals which have been observed.on-or-near.>the.site-or.are known
to be on or near the site: (see next page)
Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, ongbirds other
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
Fish: bass, salmon,trout, herring,shellfish, other
. b. • •List any threatened or endangered species known to be.on ornear the site::
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain
g0
•
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES •
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc. i-ti ry Coat Fo+t--; 1-1 rtt i $t9—k 'vim- ,
C OC ua, � e�`t Er, �-�io ti u rr rt,ta--: P01+41 L L&t L-,m4,1
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,
generally describe. l•
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: R.
GUwL�PNactf2 \.// Ste. GH ao-C- tc , Sl-FAr2-
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH . . .
6
•
Environmental Checklist -
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,
risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this
proposal? If so, describe. a
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. p 2 . •
2) •Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: o n e
b. Noise
• 1) •What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,-
equipment, operation, other)? T n,o---c<< o A Li.- t o i a✓R +N •
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example:_traffic,•:construction;:operation, other)?
Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. s i1.or 4 +1+4- �M c, o n S{- �.c--k oh
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: No A e -
•
•
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? N 0 u-s a— c) S [ +-A-J
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. p p
c. Describe any structures on the site. .0011.e.
•
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? (1 0
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 1 0
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? ( -- 0
7
Environmental Checklist �.
•
•
g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? W A j
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,.
specify. u
i. -Approximately how many people would reside or work in t e completed project?
62-S Q Lf C�
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 0 O A-e -
k. . Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1 4-
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is..compatible with existing:and -projected
land uses and plans, if any: P� c.:a ��(�,y, `2.-Icy �
9. HOUSING
a. Approxima nits would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, low-income housing. c-‘) A _L--
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing. n
Iv
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: /3 crti.st •
•
• 10. AESTHETICS
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Lo
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? cstisZ
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: f.Ar8-r LL^^
•
8
•
•
Environmental Checklist •
•
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
•
b. • Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? /0 6
c. •_What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect.your proposal? ./J. �
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 6 c1.r._.e
12. RECREATION •
a. Wh t� designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. (lu U
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts..on.recreation, including-recreation
opportunities to be provided by he roje or applica t, 'f any. L c -
co cc2a..� c�, S.�3C
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
•
•
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. ,) ci
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or -
cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 10
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to
the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. u 1 - (J
9
Environmental Checklist
• b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the
nearest transit stop?
•
•
spaces would the completedproject have? How manywould the
c. • How many parking sp p
project eliminate? % 40 _ .� ,.� � .
require any new roads or streets -or:im rovements.to.existin .roads or
d. • -Will the proposalreq r y p g
streets, not including driveways? . If so, generally:describe.:(indicate.•whether..public or
private? 6 .
I I�
•
e. Will . the project use (or occur in •the immediate::vicinity--of)a-water,::rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
•
f. . ...How many vehiculartrips per day.would be,generated by..the.completed_project? . If !'
known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. p fA, g,n,p u3 111A"'
U
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: A
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. • Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire 1'
protection, police protection, health care,schools, other)? If so, generally describe. p�
rt It A-tits.
1.
•
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
•
Nam ,
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle u 'lities�c-rently available at the site: TIMED ati.( 1143p17 efuse
se ' e h� sanitary sewer,septic system, other.
10
•
•
Environmental Checklist •
•
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the, general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which
might be needed.
C. SIGNATURE •
• .I,.the:undersigned, state that to the best.of my knowledge-theJabove information.is true and
. . . :: complete. It :is.understood that the.lead agency .may o:withdraw. any:declaration -of non-
- significance that it might.issue in .reliance:upon -this•checklist.should there:be .any willful
misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
(A/At'64
Proponent: .
Name Printed: �t� 5 c� r� r C r'{/}� D�1Z � ��.5u� rq' La(iie
Date:. .. 7- is - / 7 - i`7 .
77
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
11
"!
Environmental Checklist ¢ k
•
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
: :herheets:>sho01.4;onl ::6e:):$0..d: fo644.ions; ink 0ii.ln : dec�sion.#40 6140s°<: 4f.i#i and
R Y g p ,
programs You da:iiotrieed to,fill°iit::these sheett for:protect actions)
. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the
list of the elements of the environment.
. • . .When answering these questions, be aware of the extent.the proposal,•or.the types of activities
; likely to.result from the•proposal; would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a.faster rate
• than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly,and in general terms.
1. . How would the, proposal be likely to increase discharge.to..water,;emissions.to•air;.production,
. ..storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production.of noise? . . .•
•
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
1i
Ili
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish,.or marine life? • • .
•
91,
Proposed measures to protector conserve plants,�animals,fish,.or marineiife are: .. .
3.. How would the proposal•be likely to deplete energy or.natural:resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas
designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness,
wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites,
wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would
allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
•
• 12
r
•J
Environmental Checklist
•
•
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and
utilities?
•
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: •
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and
complete. It is understood that the .lead .agency may withdraw-any.:declaration .of non-
significance that it'might issue in reliance .upon this checklist:should .there..be any willful
misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent:
Name Printed:
Date:
•
• REVISED 9/94
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
13
V -
. ,
. .
•
• . 1
. . . .•
. • ::
. . _
- ,
•.
•
•
41011 410
Page1 of2
King County Building and Land Development Division
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
PART 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PART 2 PROJECT LOCATION
PROJECT ENGINEER • - AND DESCRIPTION
Project Owner Gszo,•rSc --9 v4/f/ eDs fro,sN Project Name 6 Uy/T /-/u11s/w4
Address P O. 13 o X 29S"/ 'A? A'7o„? wig Location
Phone (006)228-63s-6 9803-6 Township Z 3 11/
Project Engineer 3' 4,cE SS /74 e 14/4:4/ Pt' Range S-
Section
Company — Project Size AC
Address Phone /4z2S t g Z. a t
i a/«✓/44a 4a,,4 98/6 8 r{iZ4zZ-74 65"-
Upstream Drainage Basin Size AC
PART 3 TYPE OF:PERMITAPPLICATION`' .; PART 4' OTHER PERMITS •• , •
0 Subdivision 0 DOF/G HPA El Shoreline Management
Short Subdivision 0 COE 404 El Rockery
El Grading El DOE Dam Safety El Structural Vaults
0 Commercial El FEMA Floodplain El Other
P7t Other 1W/Z.7-ieWev/L�� CI COE Wetlands 0 HPA /(2/1,-
PART 5.,SITE COMMUNITY•AND DRAINAGE BASIN• ; ' , •
Community Ofr- RE/y'o
Drainage Basin
.SOv7/-1 ,'/Ne e(O ,
PART 6 'SITE CHARACTERISTICS
El River 0 Floodplain
El Stream El Wetlands
0 Critical Stream Reach 0 Seeps/Springs
I /mot"Depressions/Swales 7+•- SLAT 0 High Groundwater Table
El Lake El Groundwater Recharge
= Steep Slopes El Other
El Lakeside/Erosion Hazard
PART 7''SOILS . ••• , , •
Soil Type Slopes o Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities
/l -Zlo /yl/h/D/� /'mm//eG�
•
0 Additional Sheets Attatched
JUL I 1 1881 1/90
.—..�..n rws 17I AAIIJIM
111101 OD
.0- Page 2 of 2
King County Building and Land Development Division
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET
•ART 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS
•
REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT
•
O .Ch.4-Downstream Analysis i°s 767?S e/y›- o.�• ,��/v74,- �t'S7Bs,-i A 7
O .. S 7 Hear› 5- }/a PowWs712s.SXrn
O Ad'oBoss,-•s /D."i y/f/1s1.) A7 7,11.s 7i••ae,
CI
O
a
fl Additional Sheets Attatched
PART 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS '
MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS
DURING CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION
Osedimentation Facilities I <5,tabilize Exposed Surface
Stabilized Construction Entrance Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities
[T Perimeter Runoff Control O Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris
O Clearing and Grading Restrictions O Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities
E Cover Practices • El Rag Limits of NGPES .
O Construction Sequence O Other
O Other
•
•ART.10 SURFACE WATER SYSTEM . . • •. , . ' - •
I <Grass Lined Channel O Tank El Infiltration Method of Analysis
I��I Pipe System 0 Vault El Depression
1. pen.Channel O Energy Dissapator O Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation •
I "I Dry Pond CI Wetland 0 Waiver of Eliminated Site Storage
O Wet Pond O Stream O Regional Detention
Brief Description of System Operation
Facility Related Site Limitations 1 i Additional Sheets Attatched
Reference Facility Limitation
70 3' 1?)�7 342/`+,// E /P ' ' ,DES/.Cif/•— No ,576r.,/i/CArs 7
G/,'7/7'A 7/ew..-f �a,e.SE',t A/.
PART.11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS . PART 12 EASEMENTS/TRACTS
(May require special structural review) •
• . • rainage Easement 8fT'`'� 7' Z
v7s
O Cast in Place Vault O Other O Access Easement
Cl Retaining Wall ibr., O Native Growth Protection Easement
O Rockery>4'High O Tract •
O Structural on Steep Slope O Other
'ART 14 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ` „ "
I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site.Actual
site conditions as observed were incorporated Into this worksheet and the ` P
attatchments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided / `
here is accurate. syn.ckn.s.
40111 4111
****************************************************************
City of Renton WA Reprinted: 07/16/97 13 : 14 Receipt
****************************************************************
Receipt Number: R9704492 Amount: 2, 524 . 64 07/16/97 13 : 13
Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #3174 VSHN Init: LMN
Project #: LUA97-094 Type: LUA Land Use Actions
Total Fees : 2, 524 . 64
This Payment 2, 524 . 64 Total ALL Pmts : 2, 524 . 64
Balance: . 00
****************************************************************
Account Code Description Amount
000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0006 Conditional Use Fees 2 , 000 . 00
000 . 345 . 81. 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00
000 . 05 .519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 24 . 64