No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA77-021BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED 0 1 7 7 Pk i l l NOTICE OFR - ` PUBLIC HEARING fir y ([' /` RENTON LAND USE Pi.`, 1 i i_D Li HEARING EXAMINER Affidavit ®f Puibirca `Ib n RENTON,.WASHINGTON J f A PUBLIC HEARING MAr-i 16 1G-17 I WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE STATE OF WASHINGTON HEARING EXAMINER AT COUNTY OF KING ss• HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAM-94, t i BERS, CITY HALL, RE- NTON,WASHINGTON,ONNGDEVAR/MARCH 15,.1977, AT 9:00w ~-- A.M. TO CONSIDER THEBarbanabeingfirstdulyswornonCa" pagrTr FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. APPLICATION FORoath,deposes and says that s.h.e..is the c•h•ie•f•••Ci.erk of TWO LOT SHORT THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) PLAT APPROVAL; times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and fileNo.• 018 77hasbeenformorethansixmonthspriortothedateofpublicationreferredpropertylocat1Mt.to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- View Ave. of3011 Mt. paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, View e. No. and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained 2. APPLICATION., TO•„ at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton EXCEPTION': TO tRecord-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the SUBDIVISION;'.OR-Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, DINANCE; 'file Nor• E-019-77;" property locaWashington.That the annexed is a ::ii?. .7.C.e...0.f.....D.b 1, c 3011ed . View of 3011 Mt:.View Ave. :, 112.a.riag 3. WAIVER' OF OFF- ; SITE IMPROVE- MENTS FOR TWO as it was published in regular issues(and LOT SHORT PLAT; not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period file No. W- property locatedated i;n. vicinity of 3011 Mt. View Ave. No.of one consecutive issues,commencing on the 4. REZONE FROM G- 6000 TO R-3;file No. • 4.t. .....day of march 7 R-022-77; proper197 ,and ending the located betweenty Lake Washington and Ripley •Lane ' dayof 19 both dates North adjacent to inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- and north of- of Misty scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee Cove Apartments. 5. SITE APPROVAL IN M-P I E; file No. charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $..:3.2...24vhich A-021- .ropertyhasbeenpaidinfullattherateofperfolioofonehundredwordsforther• a = on north side •first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent S.W.west j insertion. of of Hormel Co.facility and east of the7th. St. Ear-. Iington Golf CourseC`" Via" _-)a -2.cL../and railroad spur track. Legal descriptions of ap- plications noted above on file in Renton Planning De- Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9 th day of partment. ALL INTERESTED PER-.. SONS TO SAID PETITIONS Na r C.1 19....7.7 ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- ENTEARINGATONTTHEMARCHPUBLIC15.Hal'i( 1077 AT 9:00 A.M.TO EXNotaryPublic ' and for the State ongton, PRESS THEIR OPINIONS. residing at Kent, County. GORDON Y. ERICKSNE" RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective JuneRecoPublird-ChroniclehThe r hto, 9th, 1955. Record- rni March 4, 1977. R4224 Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. pF V o THE CITY OF RENTON f MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 Y o o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER o sbq" JAMES L. MAGSTADT 235 - 2 593 glFD SEP1t"' April 6 , 1977 Richard Rockwood RE: File No. SA-021-77 912 2nd Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Mr. Rockwood: This is to notify you that the above referenced request which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner' s report of March 21, 1977 , has not been appealed within the time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sincerely, 2Games LIagstadt Hearing Examiner JLM:mg cc: /Del Mead, City Clerk a C. March 21 , 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. APPLICANT: Associated Stationers, FILE NO. SA-021-77 Inc./Robert D. Gibb LOCATION,: Property located on the north side of S.W. 7th Street, west of Hormel Company facility and east of the Earlington Golf Course and railroad spur track. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests site plan approval to construct an office/warehouse complex in an M-P zone within Earlington Industrial Park. The proposed building will consist of approximately 52 , 000 feet of .office area. A total of 52 parking stalls and loading area, together with a site landscaping plan, are proposed for the subject development. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to RECOMMENDATION: conditions. Hearing Examiner: Approval subject to conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received REPORT: by the Examiner on March 8 , 1977 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 15 , 1977 , at 11 :20 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the representative for the applicant, Mr. Rich Rockwood, had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1 , and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2 : Site Survey Map. Exhibit #3 : Site Plan Map with Elevation Drawings. The Examiner reported that in his former capacity as Assistant Planning Director he had met Mr. Rockwood at a meeting with the Mayor and a representative of Burlington Northern. At that time Mr. Rockwood indicated his intent to construct a building at the above location. The zoning requirements and ordinance restrictions were discussed, but designs or details of the building were not mentioned. Mr. Rockwood was referred to the Planning Department and the Engineering Department for review of detailed ordinance requirements. SA-021-77 Page Two The Examiner stated that he did not feel that this prior contact would influence or result in a conflict of interest in hearing or making a decision on this application. He asked that if any member of the audience felt there was a conflict that they should so state at this time. There was no response, and the hearing was continued. The Examiner asked Mr. Rockwood, representative for the applicant', if he' concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Rich Rockwood 912 2nd Avenue Seattle, Washington Mr. Rockwood indicated concurrence in the report , with the exception of Item P. 2 . , page 4 , and questioned if storm drainage retention and oil water separation facilities would be required in the form of catch basins. Mr. Smith indicated that the Public Works Department has required storm drainage retention facilities in all recent development requests , and suggested the applicant contact that department for plans for devices which can be incorporated into catch' basins. The Examiner noted that because of building setbacks and landscaping requirements, Earlington Industrial Park has become a desirable location, and was pleased that the applicant had indicated a willingness to continue with improvement of the area. The hearing on Item #SA-021-77 was closed by the Examiner at 11 : 35 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS : 1. Applicant requests site plan approval to construct an office/ warehouse complex in an M-P zone within Earlington Industrial Park. The proposed building will consist of approximately 52 , 000 square feet of warehouse space and 1,200 feet of office area. A total of 52 parking stalls and loading areas together with the site landscaping plan are proposed 'for the subject property.' 2 . construction in an M-P zone requires site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner. 3. The property has recently been short platted by Burlington Northern. 4 . The surrounding properties consist of similar warehouses with' accompanying office complexes. The contemplated use is compatible with surrounding uses. 5. Gordon Y. Ericksen, designated official, has issued a Declaration of Non-Significance for the proposal. 6 . City of Renton departments and divisions have been contacted and they have approved the application. The departments consist of the following: a. City of Renton Building Division. b. City of Renton Engineering Division. c. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. d. City of Renton Utilities Division. e. City of Renton Fire Department. It was noted by the Utilities Division that the storm water retention and oil water separation facilities will be required SA-021-77 Page Three as well as a 1 per square foot latecomers charge for water services and a 1 per square foot latecomers charge for sewer services. 7. The proposed development meets the M-P setbacks and landscape requirements. The parking plan designates a number of parking spaces which exceed the required number of 40 stalls. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The application meets all requirements specified in a Manufacturing Park zone. 2 . The proposed plan is in harmony with the intent of the Manufacturing Park zone. All department agencies involved in the application have been contacted and have concurred in the development. 3. The development of this building is not considered a major action having significant environmental impact. RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to the recommendations imposed by the Planning Department. ORDERED THIS 21st day of March, 1977 . J es . gst Land Use; earing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of March, 1 77 by certified mail to the parties of record: Oliver W. Olson Richard N. Rockwood Drew Miller TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of March, 1977 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Don J. Smith, Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3071, Section 4-3015 , request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must. be filed in writing on or before March 29 , 1977 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedures, errors or law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days- of the conclusion of the hearing. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT PSIAR 151977' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER AM PM' PUBLIC HEARING 7,819',1®,llrl211o2,3141516- MARCH 15 , 1977 Ex.THIBIT NO 7 APPLICANT: ASSOCIATED STATIONERS, INC./RCTRV'D: GIB " S _ o?/_> FILE NO: ' SA-02.1-77 ; SITE PLAN APPROVAL IN AN M-P ZONE A. SUMMARY OF REPUEST: Applicant requests site plan approval to construct an office/ warehouse complex in a M-P zone within Earlington Industrial Park. The proposed building will consist of approximately 52 ,000 square feet of warehouse space and 1200 square feet of office area . A total of 52 parking stalls and loading area , together with a site landscaping plan , are proposed for the subject development. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : ROBERT D. GI.BB 2 . Applicant : ASSOCIATED STATIONERS , INC . AND ROBERT D . GIBB 3 . Location : Property located on the north side of S . W . 7th St . , west of Hormel Co . facility and east of the Earlington Golf Course and railroad spur track . 4 . Legal Description : A portion of the S . W. 1/4 of Section 18 , Township 23 , Range 5 East , W. M . , in Renton , King County , Washington . Detailed legal description is avail - able on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property: Approximately 2. 2 acres . 6 . Access : S . W . 7th Street 7 . Existing Zone : M-P Manufacturing Park 8. Existing Zoning M-P , G General Classification in Area : 9 . Comprehensive Manufacturing Park Land Use Plan : 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chron- icle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To review plans and design for construction of an office/warehouse facility in Earlington Industrial Park . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was rezoned from G to M-P by Ordinance No . 2205 on ,lanuary 17., 1966 . However, it was not made part of the original Earlington Industrial Park plat developed by Burlington Northern Railroad . Therefore , the property has recently been short platted from .the remaining Burlington Northern property . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 15 , 1977 PAGE TWO RE : ASSOCIATED STATIONERS , INC. /ROBERT D . GIBB E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . topography : The subject site is relatively level . 2 . Soils : Woodinville (Wo ) - poorly drained soil used for row crops , pasture , and urban development. 3 . Vegetation : The site consists primarily of scrub grasses and blackberry groundcover with a stand of large evergreen trees and maple trees located approximately in the center of the property . There is also an existing large cottonwood tree at the southeast corner of the site . 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site provided suit- able habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: Surface water or streams are not apparent on the sub- ject site . 6 . Land Use.: The site. is presently undeveloped . The Hormel Company facility is located east of the site . Manufacturing park type uses are also located south of the site . Earling- ton. golf‘ course is west of the site and the Chicago Milwaukee Railroad tracks and right-of-way to the north . A sparsely developed residential area exists farther north up the hill . Fa NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area consists primarily of manufacturing park uses and golf course/open space . G. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer : An 8" sanitary sewer main , a 12" water main , and a 60" storm sewer main are available to the site . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirement. Any site development will be subject to City of Renton standards for fire protection . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route No. 161 and Route No . 240 oper- ate along S .W . Grady Way, and Route No . 155 operates along Rainier Ave . So . 4 . Schools : The subject site is not in proximity to schools . 5 . Parks : The site is not in proximity to any parks . It is , however, adjacent to Earlington Golf Course . H. APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-730 , Manufacturing Park District 2 . Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , June 1976 , Site Objectives , pages 7 and 8. 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 15 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : ASSOCIATED STATIONERS , INC. /ROBERT D. GIBB J . IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS : Development of the property will cause the removal of the existing vegetation and trees from the site , increase storm water runoff , and Cause an increase in traffic . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : A new business may create a certain amount of additional jobs in the community. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 as amended (RCW 43 . 21C ) , a..Declaration of Non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal (see attached) . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and site map are attached . N . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department All divisions and departments approved the application . It was noted that storm water retention and oil water separation facili - ties will be required , as well as a one cent per square foot late comers charge for water service and a one cent per square foot late comers charge for sewer service . O. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposed use is permitted within the M-P zone . 2 . The proposed development plan meets the M-P setbacks and landscaping requirements . 3 . The plan exceeds the number of parking spaces required provided = 52 stalls ; required = 40 stalls ) . 4 . The loading area does not appear to present any significant conflicts with parking and circulation . 5 . There will be a need to provide alternate plant types , addi - tional plant material , and better sized and spaced material within the proposed landscape areas to provide proper screen- ing and aesthetic relief to the development. 6 . Additional landscaped area should be included around and adja- cent to the proposed office area ,, and driveway entrances . 7 . It appears that the existing trees at the center of the property cannot be retained , given the building configuration as proposed. It is hoped that the existing tree at the south- east corner of the site , together with a well planned land- scape scheme , can somewhat off-set the loss of the existing stand of trees . PLANNING1 DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 15 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : ASSiOCIATED STATIONERS , INC . /ROBERT D . GIBB 8. ; A four foot landscape strip can be installed in the parking 1 area at the north side of the building . This can be pro- vided between the stalls facing each other by substituting a continuous curb for the wheel stops . This together with the planter areas indicated on the plans should reduce the visual impact of the rear of the facility from the residential hillside area to the north. P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Approval of the site plans subject to : 1 . Final Planning Department approval of detailed landscape plans including the comments noted in numbers five through eight of the department analysis . 2 . Final Public Works Department approval of suitable storm drainage retention and oil water separation facilities . 3 . Final Planning Department approval of location and screening plan for refuse dumpster. N:r ilift, A , Z IO GS UN 0 0 a AOP0,-, ii(wai ,. ,.4f..-. i....0 iii 1.0p% t 44-i144QQ.' 4144.N ti kr•.C.-.,t/rZ•:e'.* 4. r8''.?,_,oAZ.• il"ilt-*n•! a•••-' 7'" I' 1. 1• 0•." e..t K...._' ila.ai t, lii-tni t-r.at' tslali 2i1 il*. Ce-.', W. ? 1i: .. •..,.,._.•..-- . -,--.-;...SUBJECT ?ROPER'iy t._ i* ••r-'•-.•...,••.: .', G J _.... -5. W ._.-77H — 1c{ 1IIN B—I y I 3 ' • __,•__ 1 I w 7ti m L_ r li._ ice'• ' III I`:•: Y WI a U o r rI a. ii a. I PAc,A` l III 1111 I t t ' eI1 1• 0 ..1ilhil rai 3 C iA"IHIIt O. R_3 1 1 / i1 h' iliII1111i1II .+,I li- III""I fnItt, I: olii -appu:,- IU- fR , e ' i 1 - ., II I Pol :to wI I` - 1 "' I , aIIII6.1 , 1001 a 71, Pir;.. t 0iti mil. el I IIIII IllllIlIlIlIlIlllIlIi-l !• I 11-14111111-_-- -_ -_:_,_=._.,, j'`- x- -- -. -- . ' -. 1.- 4?"' eQPL711 4 r 6.-xiii\ 1 i\ ____, i 1 u m.IIL C, 1 1 S BL1 • M!''I'M ;Iu,IIL f.isoIf r Kit al 3 a 7 . "I III Illrll, illlll,II//I yyI _.. {__ _r _.., . - t. _ ' to.1 a 4 V_I 1 ILI_ IJ,Lill lilil W-1 .,- I l j _lWl_ -' 1" n t• 60 7_,.-.-c:--rItal. -.F1.7!:•",-:.4.;!:11-1-4050.I w. ile!'l *.Li .".:" --21-- • * v, r-Ir 1 i .i ¶1 'Q ti SITE PLAN APPROVAL : ASSOCIATED STATIONERS , INC . ; file No. SA-021-77 ; property located on north side of S . W. 7th St. west of Hormel Co . facility and: east of the Earlington Golf Course and railroad spur track . APPLICANT ASSOCIATED STATIONERS , INC .TOTAL .AREA ±2 , 22 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS S . W. 7th St. EXIS- ING ZONING Manufacturing Park EXISTING USE Vacant Property PROPOSED' USE Warehouse and Office COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN ' Manufacturing. Park COMMENTS 0••• 00.000.0,0000. 001000040}11\0-46"9 'Pi----'-\"--- ' i At ki INA____)„..-t---/ . .J.-3- let 414a- 0 Of 1 , 0 s Ida/1 a-17o-VS '®W tIvIA g4J9 itwoIW.Lc da.t- 'I oc4V -.p-imtddy. EM ail .03P9ny d oaz-,„I .31V E,. W 1 I li Q Z II AI"P p i fit TR y jai o rn L1.9 N I 'NI, 'c 1 5:.,„•••'0 4 bipiii.o.. ._:!. z1 sros, , ,,g; 0_4,,.; 1 4 1. ak t7.3wdOH 4: 2.:,p;. ..., I s ifiriiihrahr htlllliili111111114t s. PROPOSED/FINAL DE LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/...,,J-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SA-021-77 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-202-77 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests site approval for warehouse and office facility in Manufacturing Park zone . Proponent ASSOCIATED STATIONERS , INC. /ROBERT D. GIBB Property located on N. side of S.W. 7th St. , W of Hormel Co. Location of Proposal facility and E of the Earlington Golf Course and R.R. spur track. Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma-de after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Plann ' n Directo Date March 3 , 1977 Signature City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 DESCRIPTIO N : THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, R NGE 5 EAST, W .M. , KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED E-OEL-O'U7S : GINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER D SECTION 18; THENCE SOUTH 89° 10 ' 18 AST ALONG SOUTH LIN AID SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 20 FEET, THENCE NORTH 1° 2 ' 5" E 40 F 0 THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTHWEST 7TH STREET AND THE TRUE POINT G NG; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 1° 2 ' 5" WEST 120 . 70 FEET; THENCE ON RVE TO THE R ITH A RADIUS OF 363. 06 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF R . FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°49 ' 4 466 . 25 FEET TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF S ID SOUTHWEST 7TH STREET; THENCE NORTH 89 WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN 256 . 32 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING . P. SURVEYOR ' S DESCRIPTION : AiR I v THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUA-TER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W .M. , IN RENTON, KING COUNTY, ':WASHINGTON_,. . DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 'SECTION 18; THENCE SOUTH 89° 10 ' 18' EAST ALONG" THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION ''18, A DISTANCE OF 275 . 74 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY PROJECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF A PARCEL DEEDED TO GEORGE "A. HORMEL AND COMPANY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY AUDITOR ' S FILE NO. 73.05240389; THENCE NORTH 0°49 ' 42" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY PROJECTION 40 . 00 FEET TO THE SOUTH4E3T CCR- NER OF SAID PARCEL AND 'THE TRUE POINT OF - BEGINNING, . SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTH 1 MARGIN OF SOUTHWEST 7TH STREET; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 0°49 ' 42" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 464 . 54 FEET TO A POINT ON A 363 . 06 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CON- CAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST, A RADIAL AT SAID POINT BEARING SOUTH 15° 37 ' 21" EAST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AN ARC DISTANCE OF 430 . 46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1° 14 ' 35' WEST 151. 88 FEET TO SAID NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTHWEST 7TH STREET; THENCE SOUTH 8J° 13 ' 18" EAST ALONG , SAID NORTH MARGIN 259 . 60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING . CITY OF RENTON Rk- APPLICATION. RECEIVE 7® SITE APPROVAL FEB 7 ion FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 9 File No . SA- 16Li Pao— Filing Dat +/ ccyft //-z i L=Cr; --wad(' ill F tP, APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name „Leos 6:2r-t-r% od j)i,..hie:Phone 6` - 2, - 1 0 00 Address 9 `2- PP g g I 0 2 . Property location_ (J A i NA 6 • b i ,.i6T°A 3 . Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) s 0 4 . Number of acres or sq. ft. Present zoning I1.340L -TVU AL-Mc 5 . What do you .propose_to develop on this property? 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application: Scale A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , existing structures , easements, and other factors limiting development) 1"=10 ' or 20 ° B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan. . 1"=10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1"= 200 ' - 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7 . PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Date approved Date denied Date appealed Appeal action Remarks Planning Dept. 2-73 AFFIDAVIT ROBERT D. GIBBI, being duly sworn, declare that I am thetmnexxof the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.Contract Purchaser Subscribed and sworn before me this 14th day of December , 19 76 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle Name of Notary Public) ig ature of Owner) 912 2nd Avenue Address) Address) Seattle, Washington City) State) 622-9000 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received ;I f+rI^ti rN k',V\ , 19 By: c tiLLJ _i f,'!`Ll ifi DEC 1f 7g7Q ° e 1 --AL—m ' Renton Planning Dept . r 4; 2 7 3 ems— _ ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Ili Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department 2 Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . 6 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Plrannind Dr-fl_aartment , ( signed by r,e ponsihle official or his des I cjner ) r/ 1' I . r SUBJEC1 : Revi ew o i [Cl - 07_ 17 ; Application No . : .. ,_01,1 — 77 A c t, i o n Name :--- ,S.R.5_.0 C.9.kr-F, --STA:` /at/ .O-', —s'1 d0:_ g V; 4, Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : 2 s REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 2- 8/e iL ./ ,-,. r/% Comments : c-- He ' I I--, / %C"eh, A I' - f2 a c 14 1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : a.,y ,,-,: ",IC,7,,,,,, 7 C..m e n t s : s /. ::a c rrn v7 /c;4/z m- i ej,f/ • ,/ a/ry'l.;Y'7 Y6-,?4 G ,i.///r c' /2 y c-,/f'f'ci Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 6 -76 OVER ) REVIEW BY OTHER CITY iEPARTMENTS : Department :1 (•l C Comments . 747' ///./7 4". ie-L FirejC:r'.:6 , L U irt. ; kU'U. Jt6G ;CeiL-u4 Y F f Vi Signature of Di rector or Authorized Representative • Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : e_ jj . Comments : i Signature o `irector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department . ` v^ Comments : 1 signature• of Di rector or Authorized Represen La is i vc Date t<.t•:'i LW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTh1F.N i S Department : Comments : signature of Director or Authorized Representative c— Date CITY OF RENTON, WASH I NGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM c orF PLCFIIIED \. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY$ 4 v ICr y W Application No. J.5%;/-7/ /`7 37-77' SA - / - ' 7 ll+ rS w Environmental Checklist No. PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: 0 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are; aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help,all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM BACKGROUNDI . 1 1. Name of Proponent 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 6 Z 9 oo 3. Date Checklist ,submitted 1 4- , ) (17 h 4. Agency requiring Checklist 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal. (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : r2- 14.0i.ifs 48 000 e p Ft iz cc, Ca- rorZ g 2- 7. ' Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed- to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : 1 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Jov s 1117 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and Vocal --including. rezones) : 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: NC () 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: r C 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X YE MAYBE 0— d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,SgC either on or off the site? YET— MAYBE , NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YE- RATITE NU— Explanation: 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in : a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? RATEEE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? YES MMAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES M YBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? 4 YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE 0— f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE N.O g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE N Explanation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? DES MAYBE Th c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MABE NO d) , Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? vrs MAY B E NO Explanation: 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE WO— b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES- MAYBE 0 d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X . YES MAYBE NO Explanation: _ 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? C YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YET- MAYBE NO Explanation: • 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: ' 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? SC YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES MAYBE WU— Explanation: 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YE MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? G YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES M YBYBE NO Explanation: 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? k YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities?x YES MAYBE— NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental, services? X YES MAY E NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MMBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES— MAYBE NO Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? IC YES MAYBE NO' 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES Ml YBE NO e) Storm water drainage? x YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding xmentalhealth)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation:• 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the xqualityorquantityofexistingrecreationalopportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack full disclosure on my part. Proponent:G f r signe ) L ; t —,- "' pia L name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 t ' At : A 1 ESE ' iilli t• 1. ".,, J., v, i•: 4........• ....; V - vi • g - 0i- tlfin . \ ,.-:- 0. 1. , .. r ` 411'' 4., 4, '::. rz 44. 7-:;•- • zi-.--- i 4. /. t v.. ,, i.• a t , i; aiTT I,. ij y --' f „ i f , r 1= mac:;, ,• 1 ,, y" IAA. a. r: S. s1.... .• i. • .... LINO A\• i s. ,. aW I rp rf^, e•• , 4 if' v • Cr) ilir- R 1,,,. ..., . fi,,,., 2sii, A 1..: 1-. 4,......: 1S s , , , IT I., . i \ 1 A 1 A I( D \ t=-.; lk !' ilx, 0, ) ,. .. . . t 1 4 1\ 1. y; c alai l al . iii. ui wzr . ,., i , . f. i i 11 1 ' l Igl..: O!!!- 11' 1111.- I E r`• 1 I li. 1 j I i. Y ill 4 1\ \ Ilti t-: "":' fr y It I:,.„, ,, li pi i le - i, i . illad 1Mi. wtwa I, - AV ka tJ1M I 1 iR i i' 1 A' IF r i . mar• ( 1.'. nw• f I 4.• I i P- Ilk, INlur renal 11 , i,! 1 1F I BUR AVE $ KO 5 u. t • >.. a All i ` der it7S ail. GYiiiiiili CI r r- w Rl Al l ly II. ee; RV" L`• 1•)) Y ! 14 s •_. I t T ,'' n; il f• o. i ii' iPi rCN ' ii11 1 - f= ` jy< i. `. L I Era I: I ' aais. „ 41 i Fr, 1. _ i! IIgq•',[ 1, 1 it ' i 1 -- 1C : wroiioi ,, i ,* o• ai ' i . Ail litil tool W e, 1 , :: La 1 11 5!. r • 1 / 1. Ai 1 11111)._r ' ii... 1 GfiGO'` iGi1 r.. `, ' i' i I e! , Ph1ri !!!, . AIAAA! JI IA! I' li!' J yd F . ,• gyps pliw, i, a i ii . Y i. i.,. ,.,,,,„„?..,,,,,..,1170a ° ' C; ; '' A' 4 O" VF_) k-RiNN j ira ilt . REI, EI S JIIP 0.—. z,,, 1 cn 34 k, 017 T hO19 a CITY OF RLie1Q1 TON4,— 2 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 LA o CHARLES J: DELAURENTI , MAYOR © PLANNING DEPARTMENT OP O(<, 235- 2550 grFDSFP1 - ' February 25 , 1977 Robert D . Gibb Associated Stationers , Inc. 912 - 2nd Ave . Seattle , WA 98104 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR AP_P_l ICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL_ FILE NO . SA-021-77 Gentlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on February 17 , 1977_ _ A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for March 15 , 1977 Representatives of the applicant are asked to be pre- sent . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director. A By : M ' chael L . Smith Associate Planner wr cc : Oliver W. Olson , AIA trot •• -. sir:-- r. -i6?1 ibi s, t' Rates`- Ave~ 1' j r tot! 16- OC/ r M MEl i ` Tillwilli 9UR ,I s WMOlESALER y- 4/4, eiv i ', ki),, ••# - ' 0. , taga _ 4. ; dwa 1f.`-'• r Z r T - y' IP e yam j, o s -Ile Z• t- 247-70-BN NW to SE Renton, Washington - 200 ac. BN Earlington Industrial Park. Bounded on the North by BN trackage and on the south by Grady Way. Intersection of State fiwy #167 and Interstate '405 in upper right hand corner of photo. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON MARCH 15 1977 , AT 9 : 00 A .M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . APPLICATION FOR TWO LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL ; file No . 018-77 ; property located in vicinity of 3011 Mt . View Ave . No . 2 . APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE ; file No . E-019-77 ; property located in vicinity of 3011 Mt . View Ave . No . 3 . WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No . W-020-77 ; property located in vicinity of 3011 Mt . View Ave . No . 4 . REZONE FROM G-6000 TO R-3 ; file No . R-022-77 ; • property located between Lake Washington and Ripley Lane North adjacent to and north of Misty Cove Apartments . 5 . SITE APPROVAL IN M-P ZONE ; file No . SA-021-77 ; property located on north side of S . W. 7th St . west of Hormel Co . facility and east of the Earlington Golf Course and railroad spur track . Legal descriptions of applications noted above on file in Renton. Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 15 , 1977 AT 9 : 00 A . M . TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR PUBLISHED March 4 , 1977 CERTIFICATION - I , Michael L . Smith HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn 7 to before me , a Notary Public , r on the 1st day of Parch 19 77 , SIGNED o rl/\ ` ,) I- R y I li/ ROUTE SCHEDULE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED_ ( ;;. PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REZONE MAJOR PLAT ITE APPROV99,, ASS , sixtunk SHORT PLAT • SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION _ AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT f WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE //. '74 SIGNATURE OR INITA/L DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL ' DATE 7, '/" BUILDING pia RAFFI C 2W77 111, N G I NR I'N c J riA ..-)/// 1lrt 4 (A? / HEALTH 72 REVIEWER ' S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : PLEASE SIGN THE E . I . W . : z ilL YC' i 1. Ir. Rj'.-., t r..,, try" fY. rys/'.:".Z ii fl:tJ 1':ln...l_ a.. I:fir;;r,.,_:i`a``;'',_:,a\,,.9 M-t' r 4 Clu t ,i 7.t. il; flfiY rah„ ' i'h, r+,/.., > v... n,, rti:.1. f r' "L'f ra'r. • r,. r, I if:ate:. a ' J sq•, t•. 3S'.;?n' ;.'w 14' - ,i•t-.,:11y,- ac. L. •4 cJ b.:.,._. a... I 1y 1„"•=+L i a: , 1 .`y / s I sl fla 1 CD4/ tgs1: k V 0 1.:: i \1/4'... l' ''' 'I1 II t//: 1 JI s . -anv F+iSln 1 r' I i. il,1 iel, W...•o ~•""'.... ', i.. n Si rraa I N • ' N, fa I I N + r 1,'""_ 2I' I / • f 1ItI1µT, { .11y r ,_ ' 1 "a r'h d—" 1 I! f i j ti 1r-r4L^: i/ _-1 1` 1I I ^=1 .:prf c, ' ^ i t Id r ' 1' ./ -t • _, r, z,1..1,...-i I-..._..... etFF S f I' 1 A.+ V' l r^ • L7 !1 `, • 'i -I. l' -r.• .oa9 - e n4 ' I ^ 9 f / {a Q.E_._-- — 9nV l l / Ift .I It3I r do r r i !!tp •t i_ r r k- J f 1 '•L-1 o JPL-.1l LflD, 1^^ 101 L • rr-r..f-' r' t" I t y. +w'ni. i s 1 . •'f' ;l•I 1 d \ Iiirth: i.,:Ng-•,r; 4,, ? Qn _ • —`'gy 77 p p lk 1 '41111 1 .9 la }iiii 1,3I..- 'r •I• Ill =_Li r ^7. ( 1.1.1 I .)13Lam_ I • L j 4F,f ' rdfli; I -- f r I _ Ana•i •, 1 11 l`'1 N '" :,,-d - - i 1 11- I. 1, T, I ti s,,il,ice 1.9 - .i dyti' l. 91 T.,. yt !p[!'''"" 1*Tp,I1 p,u Ipt'P?, A , aII1r" c. Tr4T-,=1''1 T.ii,ltti1 tTf '11 d1!Aglglow; a0 IJU d 1Jf L.1_I L L1•: 311-..'_ 9N 1(. :.A = •ii- .l_'. , e-- -.I• r N 1 11,• ) It ' w A S 3' 113t•U 1 _ i '''1.S U!1 1 74741 cep'1- 1 !j.«J It' : c T S l , L _ , t .,.. b'` .IL -C, y 4 i .IL n•, <, C na.. t II.1, . ._ _ \'r uT \• \yam\ rya r,e",.__7 f J I i f+ "J i I > ` arrs/ws^l ,I 1 I • \ L 1 l 1. {' /TrAri'ir' r e b ; t.I.r . ",i'• =111.1-1-i 1VN,.`k'1' 1.1-1.!1., 1.., ;91 i-'-{aa•1•1••1 i - \`\\\. V. I t' I6. _ , ,1:k-, ,j 4:7; 'v. 7 O S_ • ,„V c OIY I f .f1 A r r'i tm 1 'i"ji.fa(,xl• 1, 11•l•1 i1I yq} p I \, ‘ 1t`,, al I77"' a, F I71 11I i,I _ sw yf, 1 r;,.....,, .I 1, 1 rC/ !. 111 in :I'.: l •` i t _I 1 •\I . i I I i. II I'1. i 1 i @ c,'',c-.'"ta+;I:o,r . J I / f a l inIg1 I a °;:i-1,a,f. [ ;'1 7= l aa.'I.Cm d A 7 •• -iq Iry _a. ,, ;SI, t1K 7 4' .I^I IX I ryt f•.,r=y ; + i ._S 1 _ [L.?: ...1 fi '', 1 I`It•1'j'_1_l . . l l i11,,,.... 4 S l1yr; a 4 .. .'- -!-I^,1,,,l •-,,. 1 I•111.1-i-1•; I//1-!.1 4..1•;• 'I' .'Tjl+ rp'`._'"'.iif 1 i 1 a J..'" r' ant+ JnI1VN5' 1 t I"li :,07"„"l 4 1' • Imo+ a Q ]ij I . , ill g• l :' --- 1-- - -t !III, t"1 1 ..-- 1 1 C" ,i• 4 I; 'l4'::: ' 1 11 3 _'___-- -/ I; I'1(, ':,1.1 r•_ CO a± i l•' , t ,1 v ,.k,, y', ' P - i I. \ i r S 1 s flFy': r l,a` 1` F 1 Fu 11 r J f fR1 ur' IVV i Q I(1 I' i _ l V:',' \ - '. 7\-\'\\'' 0( '7:'' ''' f 1." cc PV"` \ z-.;;•,,>,:•z:i.' r'-''\ - p d t.-.0 \.,,. v,,, \ i1V 4 m., l s:J P 1 .1 s::.W-•,....: 1 1' Cfr., }li Il j/ J l mm7, bi. J q III4 ii V,1-\V VI:f 1 i co i. •- --k .1.; ;- ;-:,\;%_A''',7%1,71.i.J,. , -, , _. _ 1 ,•,•: •-.../ r. 1 1 t C'es•D • 8 . .h` a 1/1 M- 9 /y, ,}/ r] u f` akji(.j -:-1 (n 1 j•_ I fl , waur. A•ttyRyq r n is CJ Er fi S i J\ v C° ,; 1(4 w c ly' ar`' r r J``} ri1 'PI 0 ins"vi traS ,1 oi tt °> __ F1s l/,' ," C-- a fir-- -1 t + D' ` - '• • ,tip E, -1;/./ ,tT cr orv_. 't1 3'' 1 f'j r• a+' tl=. •:; ` -' C 1?:/ t•n n-I r a. l E ' ." yl 1,., ` " ,,' t C'' r ur W- CfiL„ 'm 4 -‘ ,.. v, _.x-rti." -.: :y `n 7 y. W d, r. a F•1{ 0 I, 6 1,, r ® ! i tctoo,>A.s' i, J 1 ' 1•` 4 "`b 'I ins i 1_\ IA- i y". 1/4....) It : '..;•-..--t.t:14.7E'.,--:••._Lf ....,.,_,.. 1.1 i.(17 I \ Vill, ...I• I' IrIL'•'. i i'It' ' vp y WT f 1 t IT N,5,,,: :.,',.•....,,`,..1.:„...; t• f.ri. f., FILE TITLE 1.. S ','::. ':-.,.'.:.. e......... „, .,,11 41. t