HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA77-030BEks1I4G
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
MICROFILED
OF R4,
t$ 0 o THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
NA
o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
Po co-FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593
0/
SEP1
MIT
June 27, 1980
Tri-State Construction
959-108th Avenue N. E.
Bellevue, WA 98004
RE: File No. SP-029-77, SA-030-77; Tri-State Construction;
Requests for Special Permit and Site Approval .
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to the certified letter, dated June 10, 1980, transmitted to
you from the City of Renton Planning Department , regarding inactivity
of the referenced files, the applications are being officially
dismissed by the Hearing Examiner this date, as further response has
not been received by the city.
If we can be of further assistance to you in this matter, please
contact either this office or the Planning Department at 235-2550.
Sincerely,
Fred J . Kau man
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department
City Clerk
OF R4,
o THE CITY OF RENTON
U 40 0 Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT,
co. 235- 2550
4
0 P June 26, 19809
TFD SEPAL-
z
MEMORANDUM
T0: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner
FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
BY: David R. Clemens, Senior Planner
RE: UNPROCESSED APPLICATIONS
The attached applications are more than one year. old. This department
has reviewed the dismissal process with the City Attorney who indicates
that following notice to the applicants, that the Examiner should act
to dismiss the applications.
Pursuant to the Attorney's recommendation, on June 10, 1980 each
applicant was notified by certified mail that the application was
inactive, and would be recommended for dismissal unless camments to
the contrary were received by June 24th. With the exception of the
application for rezone by Chris Palzer (R-832-75) no comments have
been received. Mr. Palzer has not responded to my letter of June 18th
which indicated that he had not provided sufficient information to
reactivate his file.
Therefore, it is recommended that the following applications be dismissed
by the Examiner:
PALZER, CHRIS, R-832-75, rezone from G to MP and H-1
TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO. , SP-029-77., special permit
to construct a maintenance and equipment storage
facility in the MP zone
TRI=STATE CONSTRUCTION CO. , SA-030-77, site approval
for maintenance and equipment storage facility in the MP zone
KELLY, LLOYD W. , R-147-78, rezone fran R-4, R-1, and B-1
to B-1
COOKE, THOMAS, R-279-79, rezone from G-6000 to R-4
KOHL-CHRISTIANSON, PP-335-79, application for preliminary
plat for a seven lot single family subdivision (superceded
by PP-008-80)
DRC:dc FARRELL, GENE 0. , PPUD-355-79 preliminary PUD for 54 unit
condominium development
Attachments
OF RA,
o THE CITY OF RENTON
Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
o9Ao
e
co
June 26, 1980
235- 2550
TFD SEP-C
MEMORANDUM
TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner 1
FROM: . Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director ,a
BY: David R. Clemens, Senior Planner
RE: UNPROCESSED APPLICATIONS
The attached applications are more than one year. old. This department
has reviewed the dismissal process with the City Attorney who indicates
that following notice to the applicants, that the Examiner should act
to dismiss the applications.
Pursuant to the Attorney`s recommendation; an June 10, 1980 each
applicant was notified by certified mail that the application was
inactive, and would be recommended for dismissal unless comments to
the contrary were received by June 24th. With the exception of the
application for rezone by Chris Palzer (R-832-75) no comments have
been received. Mr. Palzer has not responded to my letter of June 18th
which indicated that he had not provided sufficient information to
reactivate his file.
Therefore, it is recommended that the following applications be dismissed
by the Examiner:
PALZER, CHRIS, R-832-75, rezone from G to MP and H-1
TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO. , SP-029-77, special permit
to construct a maintenance and equiputnt storage
facility in the MP zone
TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO. , SA-030-77, site approval
for maintenance and equipment storage facility in the MP zone
KELLY, LLOYD W. , R-147-78, rezone from R-4, R-1, and B-1
to B-1
COOKE, THOMAS, R-279-79, rezone fran G-6000 to R-4
KOHL-CHRISTIANSON, PP-335-79, application for preliminary
plat for a seven lot single family subdivision (superceded
by PP-008-80)
DRC:dc FARRELL, GENE 0. , PPUD-355-79 preliminary PUD for 54 unit
condominium development
Attachments
OF R4,
0 THE CITY OF RENTON
Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
o _BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT9'
Oo9Rr P 235- 2550
0 SEPZ"
CERTIFIED MAIL 733828
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
June 10 , 1980
Tri-State Construction
959-108th Avenue N.E.
Bellevue , Washington 98004
RE: SP-029-77; SA-030-77
Dear Gentlemen :
The above referenced applications have been inactive for
a period of more than six (6) months. In order to clarifyourfiles, we wish to know if you will be proceeding on these
applications. If you propose to proceed with the applications
as submitted, please forward a schedule which you proposetofollowtocompletetheapplications.
If you do not wish to proceed with the applications, or if
we do not receive a response to this letter within fourteen14) days, we will request that the Hearing Examiner dismisstheapplications. If the applications are dismissed, anyrenewalwillrequireanewapplicationandfees .
If you should have any further questions regarding this letter,
please do not hesitate to contact this department.
Very truly yours,
Gerd Y. Ericksen,
1 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
POSTMARK
P1 ning Dir 1 OR DATE
SENT TOTri-State Construction
CO STREET AND NO.
NElt-r't% ,959-108th Ave O
D e v i R . l em e n s, p,o,, STATE AND ZIP CODE
COSeniorPlanner Bellevu-
OPTIONAL SE'YICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES
is.00 t, Showsto whamfnd datedelivered ........•.
DRC:sh
1 "
RETURN
RECEPTp, Shows to whomtdateeandwheredeliveredSERVICESWithrestricteddelivery -- -•-- -S
RESTRICTED DELIVERY......... ...........: ..................................
S
a SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee regwred) See other sid
Z PS Form 3800
N0
NOT FOR INTERNATIONIILOMMI - cvo t s=o 5sr°'
Jan.1976
OF I
i!THE CITY OF RENTON
r 'MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH.98055
o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
4 235- 25500,
9g1'ED
MEMORANDUM
June 3 , 1980
TO: Fred J . Kaufman , Hearing Examiner
FROM: Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director
By: David R. Clemens , Senior Planner
RE : UNPROCESSED APPLICATIONS
The attached applications are more than one year old .
This department would recommend that they be dismissed.
They are
PALZER , CHRIS , R-832-75 , rezone from
from G to M-P and H-1
TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO. , SP-029-77 ,
special permit to construct maintenance
and equipment storage facility in M-P
zone
TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO. , SA-030-77 ,
site approval for maintenance and
equipment storage facility in M-P zone
KELLY , LLOYD W. , R-147-78 , rezone from
R-4 , R-1 , B-1 to B-1
COOKE, THOMAS, R-279-79 , rezone from
G-6000 to R-4
KOHL-CHRISTIANSON , PP-335-79 , application
for preliminary plat approval of 7 lot
single family subdivision
DRC : wr
Attachments
di
0
o THE CITY OF RENTON
J
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH_ 98055
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI ;MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
235-2550
60 S E
e
August 16 , 1977
Mr. David R. Koopmans
Short , Cressman & Cable
30th Floor , Seattle-First National Bank Building
1001 Fourth Avenue
Seattle , Washington 98154
Dear Mr. Koopmans :
rr
RE : TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
SPECIAL PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL
We appreciate your August 10 , 1977 , response to our recent
communication regarding the status of the proposed Tri -State devel -
opment. You mentioned a question regarding the necessary fees
for street vacation . You should check with Arlene Haight of
our Public Works Department regarding any questions relating , _
to such fees . Our records indicate that Mr . Agostino has paid
247 . 00 in fees for the Special Permit , Site Plan Approval ,
and Environmental Checklist review processes . Receipt No . 115
was issued on March 18 , 1977 , for these fees . However , these
do not in any way pertain to any fees related to the street
vacation process .
The storage of materials north of the present M-P zoned site
is not related to acceptance of the plans submitted as this
area is not included in said plans and is presently zoned
G" Residential , which is not the appropriate zoning for such
use . This area must be rezoned to M-P and incorporated into
the overall site development plans , or the materials removed .
If you have any further questions , please do not hesitate to
contact this department .
Very truly yours ,
Gordon . Ericksen ... .
Planning Director
Michael L . Smith
Associate Planner
IL
p .
l
SHORT, CRESSMAN & CABLE KENNETH P.SHORT DAVID R.KOOPMANS
PAUL R.CRESSMAN WILLIAM K.McINERNEY,JR.
30T' FLOOR,SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANR BJJII,D G
DONALD A.CABLE KENNETH L.MYER
l—..., WILLIAM L.HINTZE ROBERT S.JAFFE
1001 FOURTH AVENUE.. -
7'
P/v`: -JOHN-O BURGESS -- - -- JOSEPH-D.-PUCRKTT ---- - -.
DOUGLAS R.HARTWICH STEVEN W.HALE
SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9815 ROBERT E.HEATON ROBERT J.SHAW
f//
JOHN H.STRASBDRGER ROBERT J.HENRY
u1'LN DONALD W.FERRELL CARL B.GOODWIN,JR.
TELEPHONE'1r'-'. ,`t•l)--
L
PHILLIP OFFENBACKER KEITH G.BALDWIN
2O6) 882-333
f
PAUL A.BARRETT PAUL R.CRESSMAN,JR.
1
1 2
t EDWARD R.LANGENBACH,JR. MARK A.GOLDING
1 i JAMES A.OLIVER WESLEY N.EDMUNDS,JR.
l•-•\ .......---""."..
a../
August 10, 1977
Mr. Michael L. Smith
Associate Planner
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue Sputh
Renton, Washington 98055
Re : Tri-State Construction
Dear Mr. Smith:
Upon receiving your letter dated July 14 , 1977, in which you sup-
plied the information we requested in our meeting on July 7 , 1977,
we met with our client and discussed the various matters reviewed
in our meeting.
As you pointed out in our July 7 meeting, the first step to be
taken is to proceed with the petitions to vacate the public ways
bordering the west and south boundaries of Tri-State' s property.
We are presently discussing the petitions for vacation with ad-
joining property owners . In addition, there appears to be some
confusion as to the application that is presently on file with
the City. I have been advised that the petition is not complete.
because the necessary fee was not paid. On the other hand, our
client advises they have a cancelled check for the amount of the
fee . To promptly resolve this question, would you please request
the appropriate department to advise me of the deficiencies in
Tri-State' s petition for vacation.
We shall continue to proceed as rapidly as possible to complete
the petitions for vacating the public ways. As soon as the
vacation has been accomplished, Tri-State will submit its plan in
conformance with all of the requirements that we have previously
discussed in our meetings , conversations , and letters .
I discussed your letter dated July 29 , 1977 with our client per-
taining to the storage of materials adjacent to the subject property.
The storage of these materials is temporary and is necessitated by
the fact that the plans submitted by Tri-State for developing the
j
Mr. Michael L. Smith
August 10, 1977
Page Two
Re: Tri-State Construction
property have not met approval of your department. I will
undertake to determine when these materials may be removed.
If you have any questions regarding these matters, please con-
tact the undersigned.
Very truly yours,
David R. Koopman
DRK:mm
cc: Tri-State Construction
r
2
Of R F
THE CITY OF RENTON
Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
0 =Ms _. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING I)EPARTMSENT
co-
235-2550
41.4D SFP1E
O
June 2 , 1977
Mr. Joe Agostino
Tri -State Construction Company
959 - 108th Avenue . N . E .
Bellevue, Washington 98004
Dear Mr. Agostino :
The Planning Department received your revised site plan
on May 24 , 1977 . Upon, review, we find that the proposed
plan does not meet the minimum standards of the M-P Dis-
trict , Bulk Storage Regulations , and Parking and Loading
Ordinance . The Planning Department will not be able to
further process your application _until anacceptabl e
site landscape plan , and ilevation drawings are
presented .
Therefore, it is requested that a revised plan which is
in compliance with the City of Renton ordinances be
submitted . Attached is a copy of your site plan with
corrections noted in red . A review with King County
Hydraulics ' requirements on the Flood Zone Control
Permit would be desirable . If you have any further
questions , please contact this department. '
Very truly yours ,
Gordon V . Ericks
Pla ning ire -or
G/
Michael L . Smit
Associate Planner
MLS :wr
Enclosure
cc : Building Division
JF RENTON
RiCril/t tx\
APPLICATION b
MAR
S 7TE APPROVAL I 7
4977 ZJ
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 01‘ --DEPAVt
File No . SA- 0 ,70- -Y% FlIing 77
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THFCXk
1.
r- Phorxr., 456. 70Namel:Tfz ;7-)7A-T-F CoN"STPO C-TdOild
ri/
Address y AJE B4F4LE-VaE er6-14
7—
t4.• (3', 1017 "1--
2 Prc.:,-perty 1118LiL?ALI
3 _ Legal description (attacl. sh---,.z.-;t if ces,.:2.ary)
the -14eseriberi on}mow mud ed Xing
Wwhing,n, -
Lott Thru ,nc%us4Nie, Hillman's estr1MtV,:on
Gardena Addition to City Soatz Division No, ?, accnz
to the plat recorded in Volume 17 cz:: pagc 74, ofT, Kim; C,.: .rty, •
wa,nhington: except that portz. n said lots corrmsyee, to. tho
of Washington fox primarylitmie NichweF No,, 5 by dame:, recorded
Auditor's File No. 3911470 and *Wept that portion conveyed to
of washington toe highwey ?hammiest ty dmode NOWeded nndex
01,10 no• 544437V0 end 44404.
4 . Number of or st.7.
A A 1,r
5 . at do you propose tc develop
FA c 11-C-1 ANAL.- EcttPivtr-13
in 'ormatic with
A. acces;i' plan
struct-ar,..?s , eas,•:.7.nenU. ,
development or 7-:!0, '
arxds:aping and screer.inc.:
C . V nitv c:.-c.de land use am,
adj a ce;._ -?ar.77E' 9 200 — 800 '
and existing
7 pi,N .V'S:M 3 I'..)r.Nt 1,7)N!.
Planning Dept
2-73
1
AFFIDAVIT
I,dOE A q05.-rIit)O being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information •
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me'
this old day of jj 19 27 ,
Notary Public in and for the State of
i/
Washington, residing at UG2
2
e.i4 / ---/-
i 7,-
ez_./zi ----
Name of Not y Public)/ Signa ur of Owner)
P...5-
s-
7 2_,f.6, ,lid----• q67.-- mil-71///)5. ,4).C-."
7(Address) Address)
L&VQ 114s,?.
i - City) State)
46-3- - 25-70
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorn -ampp-dam omplete in every particular and to
conform to the rules and reg/ a )irongt he Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of su
V
ap.R c\ D.j
IIf 2
Date Received MAR l2 1977 By :
1\-\
92
N_G DCPR' Renton Planning Dept .
r ,)
r
fr,rri
O•Q,
FrITrOF:RNTIMi WA HI!TON., 4 " 1 ,{
Vri,'•'..?s,..,.,, QQ•I- 9 I ENVIRON TA CHECKLIST F0 7" C ' ' 4C
eD
4.
f
i'! 19 711.
FOR OFFICE USaE ONLY.404, o,a;yyT NG; PREEpAPPlication'No. 036' .y
Environmental Checklist No. • ./-eA• -aa/- 7 y , i ,i
PROPOSED, date. FINAL, date. I '
QDeclaration 'of Significance Declaration 'of Significance
1.
Declaration of Non-Significance ', , ' I Declaration of.Non-Significance
I
COMMENTS:
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of, 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state 'and local governmental .agencies to consider- environmental values both for their
own .actions. and when licensing ,private proposals. The Act also requires that an. EIS be
prepared .for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the'environment.
The purpose of this checklist 'is to' help the agencies involved determine whether or not a .,
proposal,' i•s. such a major 'action.`..-
Please answer the following`questions` as completely" as 'you 'can with the'' informat'ion 'i '
presently available to you. Where explanations. of your' answers. are' required, or''where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision' makers, include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary'. You should
include references to any• reports or studies of which you are aware' and which are .rele-
vant to the answers. you, provide... Complete answers to these questions now will help all .
agencies involved with,,your proposal, to undertake the required:environmental 'review with-
out unnecessary' delay
The following questions 'a 1 ,.,pp y,t'o.•your.total proposal , not ,iust to` the license forwhich
you are currently applying or' the proposal for which approval is' sought.' ' Your' answers . . '
should include the- impacts which ,will be caused by your .proposal when 'At As completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in .the future; . This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their 'environmental , review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue onto the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1. N r--ame of.Proponent i '— STATE Co STT JG-T/OAJ C,
2. Address and phone 'number of Proponent:
76-7 - /0 r net 4v ,12 --*, 7 &EGL I/U , 1h S
3. Date Checklist submitted
4. Agency requiring Checklist
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and,other factors . that will `,give an accurate
understanding of ,its' scope and nature) :
l'l /JTFAJA-?GE' FACILITY ea1P, fri Ija- S-ro/eAce . •
r . . .1r-2.D DNS '5 ' x/Oo ' .Ix 2. -%. iyi xt- ./11,4-Wr ta.0 .
X C I`fA
lE4)cE WL r 1&D V 1DOO •c E-0 1J _off tf&
I
pp
y
I
r.
2-
f(' '.t"•
l `r,•,it
7 L oca'o n:.o f proposal P. P descri be the'i1'(. physical>: setti n 9`of1;th'e',•`}p.,roposelF .:`a's•• wellas, the'extent of 'the . land''area .affected by.::any,:.envi_ronmen'tal'.•impacts',any other".i nformat i on'"needed to' give `an, accurate ',under•standi,nmentalsettingl )g'`of the' enyi ron-of'.the 'proposa
sir 'OR Oi o L Y pile.0. ;`,F21 :
Afpio1x is eb 3/ 4 e. . 1. .
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal':
q7
9. List of all permits,`licenses or r t, government app'robals •required•for the 'proposalfederal , stateand local--including reiones) :
SPPcIAL, Pi7- Ter vn
T" /474i°/l6/Mt
L Ul2D 7L1" -A-L C wcK 21.577
10. Do you have any plans, for future additions, expansion, or further 'activityrelatedtoorconnectedWith 'this proposal? , If yes, explain:,
iO Jg - Co uik/ 47 t r fi2i5oT
11..•. . Do you know of any plans.; by others which may ,affect'.the•`property covered byyour
f
prrooposal ? ' If yes , explain': '
ttach`any';other application form that has' been "completed'regarding the 'proposal ; if none has been;completed, but is 'expected to''be• filedat some''futuredate, des ribe the nature:.of .such application
O latJ(y
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" 'and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic isubstructures? '
MAYBE NO
b) Disruptions, displacements, ' compaction or over-
covering of the soil? J`
YES MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
YES MAYBE Nu-
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
PEA- MAYBE W
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
YET— MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or •
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which '•-.
may modify; the channel of a river or .stream 'or 'the ;. . .bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
J YES MAYBE NOExplanation: lid265 a ,
s
3-
2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or .deterioration of ambient air -
quality?
Y NO .
b) The creation of objectionable odors?
YET— MAYBE, NO
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either locally or '
regionally?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
Y
YES RATITE' NO
d) Change in the amount•of surface water in any water
body? . ,
YES MAYBE ' NO
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to .
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
YES M,Y E , 0—
f) " Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
YES MAYBE ; in
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either i
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
Linterceptionofanaquiferbycutsorexcavations?
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria ,
or other substances into the ground waters?
YES MAYBE NO
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies?
YET— MAYBE WU—
Explanation: &Trfir e- /—LG-z.‘ l>/A O
giPniF r- yrcam- , 1L c 44
wP Semi -7 1, 0/4 5 i'. I*Tc#s At5 , 5• v
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops ,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
YES MAYBE AO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or y
endangered species of flora?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
species?
Y! RATE NO
d) Reduction in acreage of. any agricultural crop?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
4•
5). Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity' of species, or numbers 'of''. .
any species of ,fauna (birds, ,land animals including
reptiles, ,fish and:shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)?
YES- .MAYBE. NO
b) Reduction of the' numbers of *any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? '
AYES MAYBE 'NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,
or result in a barrier, to. the migration or movement • '
of fauna?
Yr MA—,B NO •
d) Deteriorati,on ,toiexisting fish or wildlife habitat? C
YES 'MAYBE NO
Explanation:
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? -
YES • MM BE NO
Exp1anation: DC CAS!ON/q-e- $TA-/aTut' "6", 116/< S i/J 6o•6$77 /G -fc,4J
E cpt 1Pn1 ,u r M.'D j/fe 5'.s,i L rDemir op / o/Sc
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?4-ST MAYBE Fr
Explanation: '1-1 &" WIG 1, Z-lc3/1-rs WIU ` f Lt ! 'c
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the`' -
present or planned land use of an area?
M-Y— E / O
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: 1
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
TES MAYBE NO •
Xb) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 1
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions?
1VES M YBE NO
Explanation: pi E—L . F1'-1- 4- 2.cr,9l2/c4>eurS 40/GI-
gE- tfAitVLEP DA) -Fife Si PR - 4-GE L TT k5
AND Oil_ .S-,4 A Tec J P//6/L/7—/ -3 LJJ/L/-
16.57A -?,A r ' C 04)774441 4-4 i S' 4 c i DmmmA-L 5P/ s,
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-.
bution, density, or growth rate of the human. population '
of an area?
YES . MAYBE. ' NO
Explanation L .• 7i / D 6 G- tick 6.1..44.6. —
dy
5-
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing. or ,
create a demand for additional housing?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: ThiS • I—A-Wary eel tL /06,T 6 sge _ kegLuieE
47VY OF c ( pL JA-r&z 7O Re-GO
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
YES , MAYBE NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand
for new parking? J
YES MAYBE NO
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X
YES- M YBE NO
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or Xmovementofpeopleand/or goods?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , k,
bicyclists or pedestrians? J,
YES MMYBE" N
Explanation: ( Af-wtocs- )7 Op. jreRa6 L uFv1","
LLu /TjG , /F t. S' AffGGGT ex)
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
a) Fire protection?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Police protection? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Schools?
YES MAYBE•
d) Parks or other recreational facilities? J(
YES WEE- NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads?
YES M YBE NO
f) Other governmental services?JC
YES RIMY' 'NO
Explanation: /Vv /(1 ia S oIZ ) ICE c/,'CuiAfl/O.6 Mvar55
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
YES NO
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy?
YES- MAYBE Er •
Explanation:kr 4/ECO 6,2 A /T!c3/0.44. CrF, Ze//4IL
u/LL be- G,e&r1 Zr D.
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas?
YES UTTE NO
b) Communications systems? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Water?
YES MAYBE NO
r
6
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ,
YES MAY NO
e) Storm water drainage?
YES MAYBE N-
f) Solid waste and disposal?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: r.i. -CTk c Qo'.V k 4 T i-eP,/-c Gv/Gt. gyLt REQu c:STD
iertfeilPAP ,4 sTOR1ir ,0,0Mt)4 3t GO/Jr,euG•r o__.c
c if Q7 p or4 T . VS/v
L/rre=p
6 AFFECT o,1) S /D
jr S,,/fp
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
YTS— MAYBE NO
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: rt L1.' P&OCED Gal C1/4i J L.& eruct
L&v i "c> 5e.te& 44,U1)5c4J`) (--01C L e.v 11/DED 7
PJ &9/per 4Ap7J c 0,fc 5e e d 116- F,uc . cc) c/I-
kW-24-J-411---ad alf-Soctie °Artf friecr4t 7;Ye -5-Tetc&T (7041_0)
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: J 1-f p, - AJ) rig S-a/04s' B ed-i L D/44.J6 4
Pc)._ GlotevG s _ / 0 7_ s riii) 5/7"l ,cis G 1-
III . SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the leadrrCy may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in ref-?ante pon-this• che.c list should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willfulck o fi 1 disclosure o my part.
Proponent:
rgned
name printe
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
pF
0 THE CITY OF RENTONZ
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055nc
Off- NME. CHAR LES-1- DELAUR.ENTI-)-MAYOR----a P-U.-NET-ING-DE-PARTM- T-- --
11)4
kQ` 235-2550
lEO SFP1t.
April 5, 1977
Mr. Glen T. Sparrow
Tri-State Construction, Inc.
959 - 108th Avenue Northeast
Bellevue, Washington 98004
Dear Mr. Sparrow:
At our March 2, 1977 meeting, we discussed the various
Manufacturing Park District and Bulk Storage Ordinance
requirements to be incorporated in your site plans anddevelopmentalongEastValleyRoad. These include a
minimum 60 foot setback for fencing and bulk storage
along all public rights-of-way, and a minimum 20 foot
setback along all other property lines . A minimum
20 feet of landscaping suitable for screening andbufferingpurposesisrequiredonallsides . Any addi-
tional setback area may be utilized for parking purposes .
The parking requirement for uncovered storage area is
1 space per 2,000 square feet of area. The requirement
for warehouse area is 1 space per 1,500 square feet of
area.
We also discussed the possibility of vacation of certain
adjacent rights-of-way. You should consult further with
the Public Works Department regarding such possibilities .
Once you have made the necessary revision to your plans,
this department will further process your Site Approval
and Special Permit Applications . You have continued to
operate the subject storage yard without the necessary
permits and approvals , and contrary to established Cityordinancerequirements . it is hoped that this situation
can be rectified without the necessity of referring it to
our City Attorney for legal action. If you have any questions
please do not hesitate to contact this department.
Very truly yours,
Gordon Y. Ericksen
Planning Director
ichael L. Smith
Associate Planner
cc: Building Division
i
41 r-._o THE CITY OF RENTON
j `Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
C
1 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AO4' fie-235-2550
RlFD SFP1
February 23 , 1977
Tri -State Construction Company
959 - 108th N . E .
Bellevue , Washington 98004
RE : City Requirements for Site Plan Approval
in an M-P Zone and Special Permit fora
Bulk Storage . Facility
Gentlemen :
As per the Building Division ' s correspondence to you on
January 21 , 1977 , and several telephone conversations ', we
again are informing you of the City ' s requirements for
development in an M-P zone . It appears that you are con-
tinuing to move equipment onto the subject site on East
Valley Road and that you have constructed a fence contrary
to ordinance requirements without the necessary approvals .
Attached for your information and immediate attention are
application instructions , application forms , and ordinance
requirements for Site Plan Approval in an M-P zone and
Special Permit for bulk storage . We hope that this infor-
mation will assist you in completing your planning and
permit approvals for development of the subject site .
We hope that your development will be a pleasing addition
to our planned Manufacturing Park Area . If you need any
assistance or information, please do not hesitate •to
contact this department .
Very .truly yours ,
Gordon Y . Ericksen
Pl anni P D'ecto.r 2
1—/— <
7
Mi chaeT L . Smith
Associate Planner
MLS : wr
Attachments
r
SP-ccZ.`i— ,<-•--() r77 iki-:14 i-F„- CONs-11d4A.cilU t'SEP .pTM ure to follow Instructions on other side
PLEASE-F I h$e5E t(lCg(S) INDICATED.-IUR'CI RO'inOCK1 .c.,
CDf t d it io.mot;charges required for these services) .. '"..,,,.„, _
I: S w tb W i m,liate and address Deliver ONLY
I I wh e delivered/ II to addressee
z.1.-_ 'RECEIPT
Received the numbered article described below
REGISTERED N0. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE (Must always bs fidcd in)
nCERTIFIEDNt1';, , // / / 1//>Jy /'. (_33 .+ ,5 tC.P &' SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT, IF ANY
INSURED N ,L., ( .,.
D Paz( 2 :,
P as-
l•
DATE DELIVEREKi, OW INHERE DELIVERED (Only if requested,and include ZIP Code)
e
U.S. POSTAL,SE VCC'" `- "-.
OFFICIAL BUSINSSJ1
si 1S '.
Ig; yy+
Z
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE TO AVOID11PAYMENTOFPOSTAGE, $300
3 y q•Postmatl Defverh g Office
o L' . e,.SENQEFt INSTRUCTIONS
m Print initJi.e space below you`hiaq e,address,including ZIP Code. yr, RETURN 1
I?'SA raI services are ccesiied(e'heck block(s)on other side.TOz • Moi•sten gummed etfds a il-attach to back of article.
w
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DPARTMENT
4o CITY IAL_
N R.E:NTON, WASHINGTON 98955
a.
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
0,30 -7 '7
ter S a ,f`
r