Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA78-168CO CITY F RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division February 7 , 1990 Betty K. Kuechler Star Industries P.O. Box 3595 Seattle, Washington 98124 Subject: Star Machinery 17900 West Valley Highway,Tukwila formerly 4202 West Valley Road,Renton) File No.SA-168-78 Dear Ms Kuechler, The Planning Division of the Renton Community Development Department is in receipt of your letter dated January 19, 1990 regarding a request to release a landscaping bond that has been in place for the above referenced project (Landscaping bond No. C-635 4308) . At the time the building received occupancy, the applicant, Star Machinery, was required to post a bond to assure completion of landscaping along the east and south property lines of the subject site. Further, the City's bulk storage ordinance required a bond to be posted three years for maintenance. As you may be aware of, the project was constructed on property that formerly was within the jurisdiction of the City limits of Renton. With the changing of the boundaries between Renton and Tukwila in April of 1987 by Ordinance No. 4058, the building's address changed to Tukwila. Because this project is no longer within the jurisdiction of the City of Renton, and the fact that the three year landscaping maintenance period has since expired, the landscaping bond may be released. Sincerely, Jerry F. L.nd Land Use In e tor/Landscape Planner cc: City Clerk's Office 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 yTAR STAR 0MACHINERY rH1N PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON January 19, 1990 JAN 2 31990 Mr. Jerry Lind RECEIVE®City of Renton Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Landscaping Bond No. C-635 4308 17900 West Valley Highway, Tukwila Formerly 4202 West Valley Road, Renton Dear Jerry: In follow-up to our phone conversation today, we request that you send us a letter releasing the above bond. This plat bond was issued to the City of Renton. Our property is no longer a part of the City of Renton due to the boundary change annexing it to Tukwila. Since the above bond is non-cancellable, I need a release authorization letter from you which I can forward to our insurance carrier to close the matter. Since this property is no longer under your jurisdiction, I would appreciate your prompt reply. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, Betty 1 ch er Assistant Secretary mys STAR MACHINERY * 8631 So. 212th Street * Kent, WA 98031 P.O. Box 3595, Seattle, WA 98124 * Telephone (206) 872-8600 FAX 206-872-3510 BEGINNINU OF FILE FILE TITLE P11CR0F11MED SA 4, 0 ioa,(Q,. 68 - 78 INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date TO: FROM: Delores A. Mead, City Clerk SUBJECT: LJ We return herewith fully executed document (s) , as above-captioned, copy of which we have retained for our official public records . Copy should be forwarded to Star. 'Machinery Company and the other for your file. Pursuant to your memo of we return LJ herewith document (s) , as above-captioned, which have been signed by City Officials and need to be forwarded for further execution by Please file a fully executed copy with the City Clerk' s office for our permanent records when received. Thank you. DAM/mc cc: may. DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Star Machinery Company is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Legal Description attached) WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land 'as to use, present and future, of the property in order to obtain a permit to fill the described property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose CD restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, n CD heirs and assigns, as follows: C- f`" LANDFILL OPERATIONS Erosion control measures such as hydroseeding, if necessary, shall be approved by the Planning and Public Works Departments, City of Renton, to afford maximum protection from siltation of adjacent properties and drainage ways. Appropriate dust and mud control measures shall be taken as required by the Public Works Department. Coordination of the final elevation of the landfill with the northerly adjacent properties per approval of the Public Works Department shall be required. Landfill operations shall be completed within one year. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES Traffic control devices as required by the Public Works Department shall be provided. FINAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Final approval of the uses and site plan for the property shall be required by the Hearing Examiner after conducting a public hearing. Submittal of rehabilitation plans with the special permit application for development of the site shall be required. OTHER APPROVALS Final approval of the proposal by the King County Department of Hydraulics Division of the Flood Zone Control Permit shall be required. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in said action. ATTACHMENT Legal Description for Star Machinery Company: The following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: That portion of Government Lot 2 AND the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, Nlying Easterly of West Valley Road and Westerly of Puget Sound Electric Railway 0 right of way and lying between lines 150 feet and 480 feet North of measured at right angles thereto and parallel to the North line of Henry Adams Donation D Land Claim No. 43; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying within State Highway No. fl SR 181. ALSO that portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, CO Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point 30 feet North and 735.75 feet West of the Northeast corner of Henry Adams Donation Land Claim No. 43; thence North 120 feet to a line which is 150 feet North of and parallel with said North line; thence West along said parallel line 60 feet; thence South 120 feet; thence East 60 feet to the point of beginning. Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. SUBJECT TO: Assessments which the grantee herein agrees to assume and pay according to terms and conditions therein, said assessments are as follows: LID No. 269, Parcel 15 dated October 13, 1971; LID No. 285, Parcel 6 dated February 17, 1975; and LID No. 269, Parcel 34, all to the City of Renton. SUBJECT TO: Easement to City of Renton for public utilities dated November 4, 1970 and recorded December 23, 1970 under Auditor's File No. 6726577; Easement to City of Renton for public utilities dated November 4, 1970 and recorded December 23, 1970 under Auditor's File No. 6726578; Easement to City of Renton for public utilities dated September 24, 1971 and recorded October 5, 1971 under. Recording No. 7110050389. 1 tttfffrrrC/ John B. Rabel, Star Machinery Company STATE OF WASHINGTON) NCOUNTY OF KING CD COn this 'S day of 11 ,1978, before me personally appeared CO SO\A„ the person who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in cZt.4-o;, r1 ,, pF REJL 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U ` 2 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH 98055 2 p CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co- 0 L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 ED SEP-E- 0 June 2, 1978 Mr. Lance Mueller 130 Lakeside Seattle, WA 98122 RE: File No. SA-168-78; Star Machinery Co. Dear Mr. Mueller: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of May 19, 1978, has not been appealed within the time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sinc 1 ick eeler Hearing Examiner cc: City Clerk Planning Department AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 19th day of May 19 7s , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this /9' day of -7 1971 . Not ry Pu lic in and for tie *State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: Star Machinery Co. . SJ-16R-7R The minutee conta.ui a ei4 t o6 the panfii.e4 o6 necond) SA-168-78 Page Four 11. Planning Department approval of refuse dumpster locations and screening. 12. Compliance with all applicable city ordinances and regulations. ORDERED THIS 19th day of May, 1978. 01111:--e L. - reeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of May, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the Parties of Record: Lance Mueller, 130 Lakeside, Seattle, WA 98122 TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of May, 1978 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before June 2, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. r SA-168-/b Page Three CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal is compatible with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan providedlcertain conditions are met. i 2. The conditions of the special permit (SP-178-78) should be extended to the enlarged landfill.ng occurring in the proposal. These conditions would insure that erosion control is maximized and rehabilitation occurs, among other accomplishments of the conditions. 3. Improvem nt of the alternative access road to S.W. 43rd Street should be coordinated with the existing S.W. 43rd Street improvement project. Off-site improvements and roadway lignment should be compatible with the improvement project per the approval of the P lic Works Department. In addition, the 24-foot proposed roadway should be evalu ted by the Public Works Department for adaquacy for circulation of the landfillIland sales and service operations on the site and compliance with applicable city ordinances. 4. A landscape plan should be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval of the landscaping and conformance with Resolution No. 1923. On Exhibit #2 some comments were made by staff which should be incorporated into the submitted landscape plan. Also included in the plan should be the landscaping that may be eventually installed along the easterly fence of the large outside storage area. The area along West Valley Road should be landscaped similar to the Hill-Rowe Investment Company development to the north (File No. SA-075-77) . Landscaping on the north and south perimeter of the site should constitute an effective landscape buffer. 5. A storm rainage plan has not been finally approved for the development by the Public Works De artment; however, it appears that the system utilized during the landfill operatio may be used for the development also. The final drainage plan should be approvediby the department. 6. The proposed sign is within the jurisdiction of the normal staff review and approval process. l, DECISION: Based upon t e record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the Examiner's decision to approve t e proposed development (Exhibit #2) subject to: 1. Complian e with the conditions of the special permit (SP-178-78) and rehabilitation of areas wh re landfill occurs per approval of the Planning Department. 2. Improvement of the access road to S.W. 43rd Street and off-site improvements thereto per review and approval of the Public Works Department for compliance with applicable city ordinances and compatibility with the S.W. 43rd Street improvement project. 3. Submitta of a landscape plan including fencing per staff comments on Exhibit #2 for revi w and approval by the Planning Department for conformance with the Comprehe sive Plan, Resolution No. 1923 and Conclusion No. 4. 4. Submitta of a final drainage plan for review and approval by the Public Works Departme t. 5. Addition of 32 parking spaces to Exhibit #2 per review and approval of the Planning Departme t. 6. Approval of the State Flood Zone Control Permit and the Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit. 7. Submitta of an agreement to participate in an L.I.D. on an equitable, fair-share basis fo construction of a two-way left turn lane in the West Valley Road (SR-181) per requ rements of the Public Works Department and other applicable agencies. 8. Uses con fined to the areas designated on Exhibit #2. 9. Preserva ion of the easterly approximate one-third of the site in its existing state, except f*r storm drainage provisions. 10. Installa ion of landscaping along the easterly fence of the outside storage area upon dev- lopment of the easterly one-third of the site. The Planning Department shall re iew and approve the landscape plan for this area and require a performance bond or *ther method as deemed necessary to guarantee compliance with this condition. f ' I SA-1E 8 Page Two FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a site plan for an office, maintenance building and outside storage areas for the sale and service of construction equipment. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, is uncontested, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1, and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the required setback, use, lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-730 (M-P) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 8. A special permit for a landfill operation within the limits of the proposed building was approved by the Examiner on May 1, 1978 (SP-178-78) . Since the applicant testified that a building permit application would be submitted consecutively with spreading the landfill to other portions of the site, a special permit is not required for the proposed enlarged area of landfill. The conditions of the special permit continue to apply to the proposal. 9. Primary access is to be from the West Valley Road (SR-181) . In order to accommodate left turn movements on the road, the applicant is required to participate in the L.I.D. being formed for necessary improvements. Off-site improvements are required as well. Secondary access is proposed via a 60-foot strip of property abutting S.W. 43rd Street. Pavement of 24 feet is proposed at this point, which is apparently acceptable to the Public Works Department. Off-site improvements are required along this portion of S.W. 43rd Street. 10. The easterly approximate one-third of the site is to remain in its natural state and include a storm drainage retention pond. This area and the landscaping for the proposal will more than meet the 2% wildlife habitat mitigation specified per Resolution No. 1923 and the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan. 11. Parking for 50 cars is proposed on the site. The requirements of Section 4-2208.3 Parking and Loading Ordinance) specify an additional 32 parking spaces. It was indicated in the testimony that these additional spaces could be accommodated within the proposal. 12. The proposed outdoor storage and display areas meet the standards of Section 4-730.030.5 (M-P) and objectives of the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan provided sufficient landscape screening is included. A landscape plan was not submitted; however, general areas of landscaping were shown on the site plan Exhibit #2) . The 20-foot landscape strip at the most easterly boundary of the proposal and for screening the outdoor storage area is to be implemented when the easterly one-third of the site is developed. 13. The building design is compatible with the Manufacturing Park character and existing development. 14. A State Flood Zone Control Permit and Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit are required prior to construction. t + r R May 19; 1978 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARIRG EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION , APPLICANT: Star Machinery Company FILE NO. SA-168-78 LOCATION: East side of the West Valley Road approximately 120 feet north of Southwest 43rd Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site approval of a facility for office sales and maintenance of construction equipment, and the outside storage thereof. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on May 10, 1978. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on May 16, 1978 at 9:45 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: Site Plan with staff comments Exhibit #3: Site Plan as submitted The Examiner asked the representative for the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Lance Mueller 130 Lakeside Seattle, WA 98122 Mr. Mueller indicated his concurrence in the report. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the request. There was no response. Regarding the 20-foot landscaping area between the easterly portion of the outside storage area and the access roadway to S.W. 43rd Street for which landscaping is not proposed at this time, the Examiner inquired if the area would be required to be landscaped if the access road were developed into a public street. Mr. Smith responded affirmatively, and advised that review of the 220 to 240-foot area on the easterly side of the site would occur if subsequent subdivision or future development occurred on the site. The Examiner requested confirmation that the previous special permit for landfill activity, File No. SP-178-78, would not include the parking areas and outside storage areas in the building envelope, and that the landfill activity for the site plan will be done in connection with the building permit. Mr. Smith confirmed the Examiner's comment and noted that the applicant had so testified at the prior hearing. The Examiner advised that a subsequent special permit must be acquired if all landfill was not accomplished concurrently with the building permit. Mr. Mueller indicated his concurrence in the matter. The Examiner asked for further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. SA-168-78 was closed by the Examiner at 10:10 a.m. RECEIVED a _. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Cm( OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER MAY 16 1978 PUBLIC HEARING AM PM 7,8,9,10,11,12,1,213,4,5,6 MAY 16, 1978 di EXHIBITN . APPLICANT: STAR MACHINERY COMPANY FILE NO: SA-168-78, SITE APPRO A E4 NO. 6 x- 7 S` A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site approval of a facility for office sales and maintenance of construction equipment and the outside storage thereof. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 .. Owner of Record: JOHN RABEL 2. Applicant: STAR MACHINERY COMPANY 3. Location: East side of the West Valley Road approximately 120 feet north of Southwest 43rd Street. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: Approximately 7 acres. 6. Access:Via West Valley Road and Southwest 43rd Street. 7. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park. 8. Existing Zoning in Area: M-P, Manufacturing Park B-1 , Business Use G, General Classification H-1 , Heavy Industry 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three 3) places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance. C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To permit the building of structures for office sales and maintenance of construction equipment and outside storage of the same. D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City of Renton on April 14, 1959 by Ordinance Number 1745. The site was rezoned to M-P, Manufacturing Park on May 9, 1977. by Ordinance Number 3134. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: STAR MACHINERY COMPANY, FILE NO. SA-168-78, SITE APPROVAL MAY 16, 1973 PAGE TWO E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The site is relatively level . 2. Soils: Puyallup fine sand loam (Py), permeability is moderately rapid, runoff is slow, and erosion hazard is slight. Seasonal high water table. Soil is used for row crops, pasture and urban development. Newberg silt loam (Ng), permeability is moderate, runoff is slow, erosion hazard is slight. Seasonal high water table. Soil used for pasture row crops. Woodinville silt loam (Wo) , permeability is moderately slow, runoff is slow, hazard of erosion is slight. This soil used for pasture, row crops and urban development. 3. Vegetation: Scrub grass and brush. 4,. Wildlife: Existing vegetation may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: No streams were apparent on the subject site. The site is subject to seasonal high water table. 6. Land Use: The property directly north of the subject site is filled but presently undeveloped. Existing homes and businesses are located south of the subject site along Southwest 43rd Street. The Puget Power right-of-way and railroad mainline tracks are located directly east of the subject site. F. NIEHGBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The general area is experiencing a transition from undeveloped land to commercial/ industrial uses. G. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: An eight inch sanitary sewer is located along the Puget Power right-of-way, a twelve inch water main is located along West Valley Road, and a storm drainage ditch is located along the Puget Power right-of-way. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per Ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro Transit route 155 operates along Southwest 43rd Street. 4. Schools: Not applicable. 5. Parks: Not applicable. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-Y30, Manufacturing Park. I. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June 1976. J. IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS: Fill and development of the subject site will disturb existing soil and vegetation, increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. However, these can be mitigated by proper development controls and procedures. K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: Not applicable. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: STAR MACHINERY COMPANY, FILE NO. SA-168-78, SITE APPROVAL MAY 16, 1978 PAGE THREE L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43.21C, a Declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal . This declaration is based on the provision of suitable developmental standards which will screen and buffer outdoor storage and provide compatibility with the M-P zone and Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan objectives. M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map and a site map are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 , City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering. 4, City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department. 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposed development is consistent with the existing M-P zoning of the site, and the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June 1976. 2. Suitable areas around the outdoor storage areas have been designated for screening and landscaping as part of the proposal , to provide consistency with the M-P zone concept and purpose, and the Comprehensive Plan site objective, Page 8, which states that "less aesthetic uses, such as loading areas and outdoor storage areas, should be adequately screened and landscaped and placed so they are not visable from adjacent public rights of way." The screening and landscaping requirements of the bulk storage standards were utilized together with the site design and layout to achieve such an objective. 3. Detailed plans of the proposed landscaping and screening areas should be approved by the Planning Department at the time of building permit application. The types of material shall provide suitable evergreen screening around outside storage and work areas and parking areas as well providing suitable wildlife food and/or habitat per the SCS Valley Drainage Agreement (adopted by Resolution Number 1923, City of Renton; and Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan Objectives Pages 5-8. ) 4. The amount of planting area also is consistent with the 2% of site area requirements of Resolution Number 1923. 5. Earth berms, minimum of 3 to 4 feet in height, shall be provided in landscape areas around the open storage areas, Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, Objectives Pages 5-8. 6. The feature equipment display area is consistent with the M-P 60 foot setback. If properly landscaped and maintained such display for a maximum of two pieces of equipment at any one time is compatible with M-P standards and Valley Comprehensive Plan site objectives. However, all other outside storage of equipment shall be located in the designated area behind the building, except for the landscaped/ screened new equipment storage area near the northwesterly portion of the site. 7. The proposed development is consistent with the other requirements of the M-P zone as well as the requirements of the parking and loading ordinance. However, the parking requirement for the maintenance area is 10 instead of 7 and the uncovered storage area requires 29 stalls. These additional 32 spaces can be provided along the southerly portion of the site. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: STAR MACHINERY COMPANY, FILE NO. SA-168-78, SITE APPROVAL MAY 16, 1978 PAGE FOUR 8. The proposed access to West Valley Highway will be contingent upon creation of a left-turn lane. This has been initiated in the form of an LID for the general area south of the Scarsella property to Southwest 43rd Street. The proposed access road to Southwest 43rd Street appears acceptable on an interim alternate access basis. Its improvements and location relative to the Southwest 43rd Street improvement project should be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. All areas not utilized for developed access roadway shall be re- habilitated and/or landscaped per Planning Department approval . In the event that the undeveloped portion of the site is developed to a different use than that proposed, such access to 43rd Street may be required to be dedicated and improved to city street standards. 9. A preload for the building area was approved as a Special Permit by the Hearing Examiner on 5/i /7'. The remainder of the site shall be filled as part of on- site construction and a valid building permit. If fill is proposed prior to this, another special permit for such fill will be required. 10. The subject site is within the jurisdiction of the State Shoreline Management Act. A substantial development permit, pursuant to the city's shoreline master program and the state act has been submitted to the Planning Department for review and process. 11 . A State Flood Zone Contract Permit is also required for the proposed development. 12. The 20 foot landscape strip along the easterly edge of the storage area shall be landscaped at the time of further development of the easterly portion of the site and the access road. Depending on future circumstances, setbacks and landscaping requirements may vary from that indicated on the plans (i .e. , if the easterly portion of the site is sold and/or developed as a separate use and a public road provided). The "future development area" should be maintained in its natural state until it is specifically developed. 13. The proposed ground sign should be compatible with the manufacturing park concept and Valley Comprehensive Plan objectives and subject to approval of the Planning Department. 14. Drainage has been a problem in the area. To prevent further problems as a result of the proposed development, the applicant has proposed drainage to a retention pond at the northeast corner of the site which would then flow at a controlled rate into a drainage ditch flowing north to a point where it would then flow east into the established greenbelt area between the railroad tracks. Final specific drainage design should be approved by the Public Works Department as part of the building permit process. 15. Off-site improvements (curb, gutter, sidewall , street planting) will be required along the portions of the site adjacent to West Valley Highway and Southwest 43rd Street as part of development per Public Works Department comments. 16. Utilities are available to the subject site. P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the site plan subject to: 1 . Final. Planning Department approval of detailed landscape and screening plans for the entire site development with emphasis on suitable landscaping and berming to reduce visual impacts of outside storage and parking areas, together with material suitable for wildlife food and habitat. An 8' screening fence shall be provided around the storage area. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PREL' IMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: STAR MACHINERY COMPANY, FILE NO. SA-168-78, SITE APPROVAL MAY 16, 1978 PAGE FIVE 2. No outside storage except as designated in the feature display area and new equipment display area shall be permitted closer to West Valley Highway than the rear (east end) of the proposed building. 3. Parking spaces shall be provided per ordinance requirements and Planning Department approval . 4. The easterly portion of the site shall be preserved in its natural state until future specific site development occurs. Such development shall be subject to City of Renton development standards, including possible subdivision requirements. 5. The landscaping along the easterly portion of the site shall be installed per ordinance requirements and Planning Department approval at the time of future site development of the easterly portion of the site. Such requirements and setbacks may vary depending upon future ownership, access, and development alternatives. 6, The proposed access to West Valley Highway shall be improved and coordinated per Public Works Department approval with the requirement for a left-turn lane provision along the portion of SR 181 fronting the subject site. The Public Works Department shall also approve the access to Southwest 43rd Street and improvements as an interim measure. Further access improvements and possible dedication may be required as part of future site development. Access must be coordinated with Southwest 43rd Street improvement project. All area not utilized for access im- provements shall be rehabilitated and/or landscaped per Planning Department approval . 7. Public Works Department approval of final detailed drainage plans which will provide suitable on-site retention and off-site handling so as not to impact adjacent properties. 8. Approval of Shoreline Management and Flood Zone Control permits. 9. Planning Department approval of refuse dumpster location and screening methods. 10. Fire Department requirements for fire flow, fire hydrant location, and other applicable fire code standards. 11 . Planning Department approval of a ground sign or monument sign. 12. Final design and approval by Public Works Department of utilities plans together with any charges which apply. I W I I I H ill_y 1 y tfty Vim I o IIJ r Ilr'i B F1. i b II I N. N.::. ..., ` 1,,, . „,i;.•410 111,1”.••••••••011-.10.M.0 ei•4M.MID..1M.........•.i.• r i— - -M MD' p I , I, 1._. L ra I` 1 1 I M( l'H ..." 5, • p ° i I Mr I I, G I ti. L3' 1 its + 4. 1 ../- •..•.O.....I•. . •••r..j'.•W.W..0..OR.OD.OD.I.i1.MAit1.4111.......•........ 4 n_ i 1 ti i IIW1I tliill I1I7 r Y1 I lb) t STAR MACHINERY COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL IN AN M-P ZONE , File No . SA- 168-78 ; property located 120 feet north of S . W . 43rd Street along the west side of West Valley Road . x. APPLICANT STAR MACHINERY TOTAL AREA ±7 acres . PRINCIPAL ACCESS West Valley Road and S . W . 43rd Street EXIS-1ING ZONING M-P , Manufacturing Park EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Office Sales and Maintenance of Construction Equipment COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park COMMENTS I 1I If I 1 e, 11 ) I L•, M I TS IllM .. 4 -o =F.. ,ill 880' 1\ i rn U:< 1 \ M is r.r" : 1 ,\ la t 11 an< 1 1 1111111111/ 11111Y I a. 4. 41 1 ;" 0 I 0- Nt it t 1... La. ei __. 44 c. s.rsv‘r\zrccv, iodic 5. 3 Rb tss' Sitrei% v 1 i ' 1: I mar lei rsr. • imam ma ie/ sr 4:: mem , siegt., . . 6164... MIMI • . au, Lj Ii t w_ li I El .„,,,.> II NA A T N t I I ii / 1 SCALj I'', Zoo' SUBJECf S17E IMI STAR 11 CHINfltY aITr RPPROvAL N . SA- 1078 POU7_1: S r,l,F fl PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED 4/z,s-hy PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: R``'0. MAJOR PLAT s4-J(4- 7e SITE APPROVA' S1A e, 1 IACY SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SECRELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENTWITHANYCOMMENTSYOUNIGHTHAVE , BEFORE 0//ley SIGNATURE OR IN : 7 " DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE / J ))1o )1 TRAFFIC TEN' ENGINEERI" HEALTH Y 41 1 , 7( REV: E ER 'S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W. : ROUyING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS IT Finance Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department 2 Building Div. Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) SUBJECT : Review of ECF-Application No . : 3A- -IU'7T Action Name :AIZ,_ ILA - 14WalySr- RI LA1J Aw20 J,&t Please review the attached . Review ,requested by ( date) : 5 z. 7? REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ' 3L7 C o m m e n t s : 1\ ai a ' tea t 6 V))_ Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEU BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 5 C o m m e n i s : /1-4 J-i /i&-J. S.D. /'EC-7- %— 4--6 C."777 \-I ems/T `r/Q-7 fiY,oiork)i-5^ ?4,-, irsee- Dr, Sw p0"z 1' 7// ,Law. /xccss 4s re-eruJ 'CQ 4 Fri = Ci-1IC`r_ ma's . rze a ,v/14, .1 %i. 7` C10/dC r'CI C/2:7 -7-./ dr c' Pt; o% C,c-c-'6 e_ CC i 4(17 Signature of Director or Aut iori d Repre; n ati vc Date 1 t, - /O OV!.!' ) RE1I1.1; BY 01111.R C11 Y DEPARTMENTS : Department : 7 /1 • 21 :J Comments : s/ y wry.)i 7`— 7th.3) Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : v Comments : s _.At; r. urr .'T,, g c GS Ta /'n/f/f r rx L. S ' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date - REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : 17Ln?rend dra;r ,:< : . C 7411/ 71 el 4,( ,- c. n o ac(vc r:,c. '0%1. td 4. 1 7ere7 rti pt.S/ 742 1!r.,, Q Jj 4., ,. ] / 'cap c!J- / 7 Ar I SrG, e_ 4. . eYQ h D;/ fS a S-I f b J frl,4 7 C. p d le.., , r"rove iM e7z. Jf /1 1 f' w r r r'C- c.a,.c. 7 4- 1— Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date i,LVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments :• S i ynature of Di rector or Authori zed Repro;nn tat i 're PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCEi .._N-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SA-168-78 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 340-78 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Site plan approval to construct office, rental , and maintenance facility for construction equipment. Proponent Star Machinery Company Location of Proposal East side of West Valley Highway approximately 120 feet north of Southwest 43rd Street. Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to have XQ not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : This declaration is based on the provision of suitable developmental standards which will screen and buffer outdoor storage and provide compatibility with the M-P zone and Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan objectives. Measures , if any , that .could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title P11 g I recto Date May 9, 1978 Signature /iu.,.t,./ L c,.,r r'• City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING Affidavit of Publication IN THE COUNCIL CHAMB- ER, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MAY 16, 1978, AT 9:00 A.M.TO STATE OF WASHINGTON CONSIDER THE FOLLOW- COUNTY OF KING ss. ING PETITIONS: 1. NANCY A. KRAFT, application for two-lot short plat approval, File is ro.a r e t Ha rb a u g h No. 140 78, application being first duly sworn on for waiver of off-site im- provements, File No.W- she Chief Clerk 141-78, and applicationoath,deposes and says that is the of for application for excep- THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and Lion to subdivision ordi-has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred nance regarding pipes-to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- tern lots, File No.E-157-paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, 78; property located inanditisnowandduringallofsaidtimewasprintedinanofficemaintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton the vicinity of 1911 Union A -Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of theSuperiorCourtoftheCountyinwhichitispublished,to-wit,King County,TAR MACHINERY COMPANY --- ' -,.n Notice of Public a, itWashington.That the annexed is aM-P , dA No. SA-Washington. e - ed Hearing r eet north of S.W. 43rd Street along the west side of West Valley Road. as it was published in regular issues(and 3. DEAN W. BITNEYnotinsupplementformofsaidnewspaper) once each issue for a period LEISURES ESTATES), application for prelimi- nary mobile home,park of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the approval for addition of 18 lots to existing mobile home park,File No.WI-C.) day of May 19 78 ,and ending the 164-78;property located adjacent to and northerly of existing Leisures Es- tates Mobile Home Park.day of 19 both dates Legal descriptions of filesinclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- noted above on file in thescribersduringallofsaidperiod. That the full amount of the fee Renton Planning Depart- ment. 2 9 7 All interested persons tochargedfortheforegoingpublicationisthesumof $ which said petitions are invited tohasbeenpaidinfullattherateofperfolioofonehundredwordsforthebepresentatthepublicfirstinsertionandperfolioofonehundredwordsforeachsubsequenthearingonMay16, 1978 atinsertion. 9:00 A.M. to express their opinions. incl. Cx..c.e(. j-/ ..e,lt. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN RENTON PLANNING DIRECTORChiefClerkPublishedinTheRenton Record-Chronicle May 5, 1978. R4933. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 5 day of May 19 78 REN roN Notary Public ' anfor the State of Washingt n, O D residing at Kent, King Cou ty. cv v OJ1 WHr Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June V j 9th, 1955. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, f adopted b) the newspapers of the State. A ANNING O 4 0 OFFCITYOFRENTONRi/ , APPLICATION 44? • 18 Z`SITE APPROVAL 974 t ni M" I " Z-CA0 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY s2 ',•,-\ , File No . SA- / -2X Filing Date ACjjEPARI— Application Fee $ Receipt No. -4/7‘)-5 Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS1104, ,A 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name 4..,, VVAL r QO • Phone 0 3'd7(O0 Address r C'• -vleitA 'S Sazts- .2•LeAa'-o Lt' iJ • `181a4 2 . Property location W ' 3005 120 cr NDt5kF. go• tSO fir--. c .ui . 41124. 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) 4. Number of acres or square feet 1 10e ± Present zoning POP' 5 . What do you propose to evelop on this property? LV 3 Act W!. ,1,dIVC e L l ate Zic-c..e i o tC.te- rr ('CBI -o virkoptvre,r. c ocitt trow w I t0 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Deft. Rev, 1-77 ikiLEGALDESCRIPTION — STAR MACHINERY PROPERTY G OF Adescribed_real estate, ituated in the County of atatr :''a :nntun Zj ' 7/+R portion of Governmen L ttfe Northeast 1;4 of the Northwest Sec Sv: 36, To.::: s11D 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying 't . of tZ s, `Jai ley Road and Westerly of Puget Sound Electric Railway right of ..ay and ng _` en line 150 feet and 480 feet North of measured at right angles thereto and parall Gto it .e of Henry Adams Donation Land Claim No. 43; EXCEPT that portion the _of lfinj High.;av ';o. SR 181 . ALSO. that portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the North'.;est 1/4 of Section 25, _ - 23^^J'':^, b:nce 4 East, .T': , in King County, 'Wash ngton, desara.bad as fol1ews : ^egi nir; a: a port North and 735.75 f West of artheast corner of Han. . .._a s yo u _ , _an i No. 43; Lhui:ce north 120 feet to a line ' :ch is 1 50 feet ,,ai th o" and oral l _i s.. ... ..3[ tf line; thence 'West along said parallel 1 ine 60 feet; thence South 120 feet; last 47, feet to the point of beginning. Situate in the City Of Renton, County of King , State of Washington. SUBJECTagrees accorcing to termsTO: Assessments which the grantee herein ayre..s to assume and pay acc:;. 9 and condtions therein, said assessments are as follows : LID No . 2E9 , Parcel 15 dated October 13, 1971 ; LID No. 285, Parcel 6 dated February 17, 197E; and 2&9, Parcel 34, all .o City of Renton; SUBJECT TO: Easement to City of Renton for public utilities dated November 4, T970 and recorded December 23, 1970 under Auditor's File No. 6726577; Easement to City of Renton for public utilties dated November 4, 1970 and recorded December 23, 1970 under Auditor's File No. 6726578; Easement to City of Renton for public utilities dated September 24, 1971 and recorded October 5, 1971 under Recording No. 7110050389. 71 3_ G 1p t. -7.:4;; . F /Pe 114 AFFIDAVIT A O lam N. 6Fla RTMs K f/ '. r,'Zl nbeing duly sworn, declare that I am the owner, of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 51 day of Milit.b0-- 191 f) Notary Public in and for t -StaLIte of p Washingtpn, residing at_ . cam t. % Iv"a.ne of Notary Public) Signature of Owner) WA. D . 3 S61S Address) Address) i City)State) TTelephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON, WASH 1 NGTON j\Oic7 0- ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1' 17 4pR F o 2 • 18" 949 Z FOR uFfICE USE ONLY D PARI Application No.. j__ ./ti- fo Environmental Checklist No. ,EEC'/= PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date : l ! Declaration of Significance O Declaration of Significance QDeclaration ofNon-Significance n Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : t • Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared -for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a ' proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided , or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are ,rele- . vant to the answers you provide . complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which. you are ,currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, , even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future . NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the•State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may, not apply to your proposal . If a question does r,ot apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the r.. next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM BACKGROUND 1 . Name of Proponent tNT ll'/ Address and phone number f Proponent : 3. Date Checklist submitted ifil_r) 4. Agency requiring Checklist e t i"tr L 5. Name of proposal , if applicable : Z-a654 • 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : St-tv Mtn* ek- 1914,10. NVI.K \ rib 1,)S-f1W U`t iI- OnAto 2 f g•W(C OE elmStiliMi0u ry610 ROKelt. _ tAv 1 A Srte r a V 1 it1. Location of pos (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as wellastheextentofthelandareaaffectedbyanyenvironmentalimpacts , includinganyotherinformationneededtogiveanaccurateunderstandingoftheenviron- mental setting of the proposal ) : a SOV ill?_.. c LN_ 11-1,6t- jl1 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : rr O 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposalfederal , state and local --including rezones) : St:ntPr rt `f Sao e t A- - (1 b L. orri9r cam 5aLococi KtP :> o. i ( r U 3.)-_ P o wc0G MAIM-. tzeiktto_. su peolArt— 1C. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activityrelatedtoorconnectedwiththisproposal? If yes , explain: u _pu s- ,ttti 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered byyour' proposal ? If yes , explain : Lyo • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-posal ; it none has been 'completed , but is expected to be filed at some futuredate, describe the nature of such application form: 106.05 I1 . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1 ) Earth. Will the proposal result in : a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MA £ NU b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? YES MAYBE HL c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? MAYBT d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features?' YES MAYBE NO' e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YES MAYBE. NO • f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation:YES MAYBE Nb— take tiotiL e©t ooer (7t oe/L ojt 5o (OIL, _ AA19wit_ 0 ci3(O kt p • . e r wow s-no s t uti go ettt} a 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: Ni•) a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE f b) The creation of objectionable odors? Vt MAYBE NU . c) Alteration of air movement , moisture or temperature. or any' change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES WATITE NO Explanation: 4.f PaU14,44 'l. jaasx I 13.3(o VIU41443 -'- 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X. YES M YBE NOd) • Change in the amount of surface water in any waterbody? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE N' f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or throughinterceptionofanaquiferbycutsorexcavations? X YES MAYBE NO h)- Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NQ i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise availableforpublicwatersupplies? 1 Y!- MAYBE AO Explanation: 4 t 3't'1013_ -tJ t -1 r efom4A £O A'+ 1t egocp 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of anyspeciesofflora ( including trees , shrubs, grass , crops, 4 . microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE, AU- b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE. N c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area. or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existingspecies? Yam— MAYBE N0 d), Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YET- MAYBE W57 Explanation: 1 5) fauna. Will the NfoNosal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of 7`fit' any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,t -,'•. insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE h) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna?p YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in .a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE ' NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: I) N•S"f'V0011u _ ! f i H.s eemes Ao'iui Oubitc ld- IMA1 Piteu1 g c o- _*nit aitorck.. itMACC- 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?Q YE MAYBE NO Explanation: ei__-_ eikosno flitkpRc V Ems-• 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE NO- E x_p 1 a n a t i o n: f"1-V!/l,(DVI. U f!pt4'f'1)&O ts,L,_. 64= 0944 C) Land .Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MTYBE !p` Explanation : 9) Natural Resources . Will the proposal result in : a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? its— MAYYBBt N b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve' a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous si.bstances (including. but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? y ES MAYBE N Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal- alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES MAYBE Explanation: Yvu^`+ LItyt, It) 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE N6 Explanation: r 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? 7144 WAYIT NZ? b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? YES TafgE N ig c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? Yam' MAYBE No` d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? Y MAYBE— NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? VET— MAYBE NO' f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?YES MAYBE Explanation: 6!)p Rix '3o -f-p k3 o VoutluActse fen, to Vvit 6-1- SE4(pM t .fic iv -}o (2 UPS fJf2. O uOt tVC 14) Public Services. Will the' proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE b) Police protection?YES MAYBE c) Schools? YES MAYBE N S d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES UM f) Other governmental services? YES AvR Nir Explanation: tOA L-(2j 610(.111 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? E - MAYBE Nb b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES ,, MAYBE N Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? fr§— MAYBE 6— b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO V . •. • f hl 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE iitL e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE NT f) Solid waste and disposal? YES M71YBE NO clAtUllOr-80. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal .`esult in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excludingmentalhealth)? grV17— KM Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYB Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES RATITEMO' Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that- the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure' on my part. de Proponent: 5tkf name printed) t72_ VI/1Aetw,,n-lj ;+D • City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON LOB IC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER kIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , A I NGTON , ON MAY 16 19 78 , AT 9 : 00 A . M . TO CONSIDER of FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . NANCY A. KRAFT , APPLICATION FOR TWO-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL, File No . 140-78, APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS , File No . W- 141-78, AND APPLICATION FOR APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS , File No. E- 157-78 ; property located in the vicinity of 1911 Union Avenue N . E . 2 . STAR MACHINERY COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL IN AN M-P ZONE , File No . SA- 168-78 ; property located 120 feet north of S . W . 43rd Street along the west side of West Valley Road. 3 . DEAN W. BITNEY ( LEISURES ESTATES ) , APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY MOBILE HOME PARK APPROVAL FOR ADDITION OF 18 LOTS TO EXISTING MOBILE HOME PARK, File No . MH- 164-78; property located adjacent to and northerly of existing Leisures Estates Mobile Home Park . Legal descriptions of files noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SFID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT IHE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 16 , 1978 AT 9 : 00 A . M . TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED May 5 ; ' 1978 RENTON PLANNING DiIRECTOR CERTIFICATION 1 , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMEtTWERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DES. R';IBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . I ATTEST : Subscribedjand sworn to before me , a Notbry Public , on the 3rd day of WO 7819 SIGNED ov RAN d THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055JLo pQ "' on. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI• MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENTO9238-2SSalfOSEP1LwO May 3, 1978 Star Machinery Post Office Box 3595 Seattle , Washington 98124 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCEANDPUBLICHEARINGDATEFORAPPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVALINANM-P ZONE , FILE NUMBER SA- 168-78 ; PROPERTY LOCATED120FEETNORTHOFSOUTHWEST43rdSTREETALONGTHEWESTSIDEOFWESTVALLEYROAD Dear Applicant : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the abovementionedapplicationonApril18, 1978 blichearingbeforetheCityofRentonHearingExaminerhasbeensetforMay16 , 197a at 9 : 00 AM Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present .All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing .If you have any further questions , please call the RentonPlanningDepartment , 235- 2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director By : Michael L. Srt. th , Associate Planner mlk cc : Lance Mueller and Associates 130 Lakeside Seattle , Washington 98122 George Wannamaker State of WashingtonDivisionofHydraulicsDepartmentofEcologyKingCountyGovernmentNorthwestRegionalOfficeRoom976KingCountyAdministration4350 - 150th NortheastSeattle , Washington 98104 Redmond , Washington 98052 ROUE SCHEDULE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED 0..V7Y PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REZONE MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL Nry1T r' WAIVER PERMIT R E X E M P T L STAre MAUF"c4..Agc, AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENTWITHANYCOMMENTSYOUMIGHTHAVE , BEFORE 5 7W SIGNATURE OR INI hL pEPAR iMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE BUILDI 1 iRAiFiC E' G . 1 r ENGINEERI,' ie 4101110 1/47/4d HEALTH ups 1n I =;•:ER 'S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : PLE =.SE SIGN THE E . I .W. : PROPOSED/FINA )ECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANL.L., NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SA-168-78 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 340-78 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Site plan approval to construct office, rental , and maintenance facility for construction equipment. Proponent Star Machinery Company Location of Proposal East side of West Valley Highway approximately 120 feetof Lead Agency Renton PlanninghDepartmentest 43rd Street. This proposal has been determined to have Q not have asignificantadverseimpactupontheenvironment . An EIS 0 isisnotrequiredunderRCW43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision wasmaeafterreviewbytheleadagencyofacompletedenvironmentalchecklistandotherinformationonfilewiththeleadagency . nonReasonsfordeclarationofenvironmental /significance : This declaration is based on the provision of suitable developmental standards which will screen and buffer outdoor storage and provide compatibility with the M-P zone and Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan objectives. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate theenvironmentalimpactstosuchanextentthattheleadagencywouldwithdrawitsdeclarationofsignificanceandissuea ( proposed/final )declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Plat . g I ectot J- V Date May 9, 1978 PORSignature 1 :r`r City of Renton Planning Department 5-76