Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA78-222BEIph1Ii& 1 OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED pF RFC. o THE CITY OF RENTON ao Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 z o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER p Q L. RICK BEELER . 235- 2593 1E0 SE Pity November 3, 1978 Mr. Jirgil Gooden 18703 S.E. May Valley Issa3uah, WA 98027 RE: File No. SA-222-78; Virgil Gooden Request for Site Approval. Dear Mr. Gooden: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was apprpved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of October 19, 1978, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sincer_ely, L. R.ck Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 19thday of October 19 78 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this '\ day of O C Q( 19 IS . kN_KN,IC Lri\ . 019/r Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case : Virgil Gooden, SA-222-78 The. minutes contain a Uot o6 the panti.eA o6 necond) October 19, 1978 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION . APPLICANT: Virgil Gooden FILE NO. SA-222-78 LOCATION: Vicinity of 1550 Union Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests site approval for a modular duplex dwelling in an R-2, Residential Two-Family District. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on October 12, 1978. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on October 17, 1978 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reporte3 that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: Robert C. Jackson Short Plat Map Exhibit #3: Plot Plan The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Virgil Gooden 18703 S.E. May Valley Issaquah, WA 98027 Mr. Gooden indicated concurrence in Exhibit #1, and entered a proposed landscape plan for the project in compliance with recommendations denoted in Section P.3 of Exhibit #1. The plan was labeled as follows by the Examiner: Exhibit #4: Landscape Plan The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the request. There was no response. The Examiner referenced Section 0.4 of Exhibit #1 which pertains to previously established restrictive covenants imposed during short plat approval of the site in 1976, and requested a copy of the covenants to enter as an exhibit in the subject hearing. Mr. Clemens indicated that a copy would be provided and the covenants, dated May 26, 1978, were labeled as Exhibit #5 by the Examiner. The Examiner inquired if determination could be made to establish whether the landscape plan conforms to requirements stipulated in the covenants. Mr. Clemens indicated that the plan establishes the first twenty-five feet adjacent to the northern property line to be maintained as a landscape buffer, denotes retention of existing vegetation on the site, designates that no structure or building is located within twenty-five feet of the northern property line and no more than two duplex units will be constructed on the site in conformance with Exhibit #5, restrictive covenants. Therefore, he indicated Planning Department approval of the landscape plan as submitted. The Examiner requested an extension from 14 to 21 days for issuance of a decision on the subject application due to an existing backlog in the Examiner's office. There was no objection. T e-Ekaminer requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. SA-222-78 Page Two SA-222-78 was closed by the Examiner at 9:25 a.m. FIND NGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Exa 'ner now makes and enters the following: FIN NGS: 1. he request is for approval of the site plan and landscape plan for a duplex as equired by restrictive covenants (Exhibit #5) and rezone Ordinance No. 2939, my 7, 1975. 2. he Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and rovisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, is contested, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report y reference as set forth in full therein. 3. ursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition expressed to the proposal. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity, except sanitary sewers. The King County Division of Environmental Health Services has approved a septic tank permit for this proposal. 7. The proposal is compatible with the required lot coverage, height requirements and setbacks (except for the real yard setback) of Section 4-708 (R-2) , Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. Section 4-708. (4) . (b) requires a minimum 25-foot rear yard setback. The site plan (Exhibit #3) shows a rear yard of only 20 feet. 8. Existing restrictive covenants (Exhibit #5) require: a. Submittal of a landscape plan for approval by the Planning Department. b. Construction of only one duplex on the lot. c. Approval of the site plan and landscape plan by the Hearing Examiner. 9. The subject site was segregated on January 23, 1976 (Exhibit #2) . 10. A landscape plan (Exhibit #4) was submitted. This plan appeared not to be of scale and in conformance with the site plan (Exhibit #3) . 11. Off-site improvements have not been installed and are required. 12. Storm drainage plans have not been approved by the Public Works Department. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal conforms to the applicable portions of existing restrictive covenants Exhibit #5) . 3. The site plan requires revision to conform to the 25-foot rear yard setback. This will require revision of the relationship of the carports to the building. Such a revision can be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department for conformance with the required setbacks of Section 4-708. Further review by the Examiner appears unnecessary provided revisions to the site plan are not sufficiently major to constitute a substantially different site plan. 4. Exhibit #4, Landscape Plan, requires revision to accurately coincide with the plot plan (Exhibit #3) as revised per Conclusion No. 3. The landscape plan must indicate the size of material to be planted. Otherwise, the concept of the landscape plan appears acceptable. Final approval of the revised landscape plan can be given by the Planning Department. SA-222-78 Page Three 5. Storm dra-nage plans must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department. DECISION: Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the Examiner's decision to approve the proposal subject to: 1. Revision of the site plan (Exhibit #3) to provide for a 25-foot rear yard setback per Section 4-708. (4) . (b) . The Planning Department is to review and approve this revised p:Lan for conformance with the setback requirements of Section 4-708; except if the revised plan is substantially different from Exhibit #3 the Examiner will review and approve the revised plan. 2. Revision of the landscape plan (Exhibit #4) to conform to the revised site plan and state the sizes of the proposed plant material. The Planning Department is to review and approve this revised landscape plan. 3. Submittal of the storm drainage plan to the Public Works Department for approval. 4. Compliance with all other applicable ordinances and regulations of the City of Renton. ORDERED THIS 19th day of October, 1978. j L. ick Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of October, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Virgil Gooden, 18703 S.E. May Valley, Issaquah, WA 98027 TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of October, 1978 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in waiting on or before November 2, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision c,f the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCT 1 71978 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER AM PM 7,Rt9,10,1L12,1,2,3,4,5,6 OCTOBER 17 , 1978 APPLICANT : VIRGIL GOODEN EXHIBIT NO. FILE NO : SA-222-78 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: ITEM NO x0 g The applicant requests site approval for a modular duplex dwelling in an R-2 , Residential Two Family District. B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : VIRGIL GOODEN 2 . Applicant : VIRGIL GOODEN 3. Location :Vicinity of 1550 Union Ave . N . E . 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : 9 , 130 square feet 6 . Access : Via Union Avenue N . E. 7 . Existing Zoning : R-2 , Residential Two Family ; Medium lot size of 7200 square feet. 8 . Existing Zoning in the G-7200, Residential Single area :Family; R-2 , Residential Two Family ; R-3 , Residential Multiple Family ; B-1 , Business Use . 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Medium Density Multiple Family 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST : To allow construction of a modular duplex building on the site. D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No . 2472 dated March 28, 1969 . It was subsequently rezoned to R-2 by Ordinance No . 2939 dated July 7 , 1975 , and short-platted as of recording date on January 23 , 1976. E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level with a slight rise to the east at approximately a 3 . 5% slope . 2 . . Soils : Arents Alderwood material , 6-15% slopes (AmC ) . Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is moderate to severe. This soil is used for urban development. PLANN:[NG DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : VIRGIL GOODEN , FILE NO. SA-222-78 OCTOBER 17 , 1978 PAGE TWO 3 . Vegetation : Ground cover consists principally of short grass with some minor shrubs . Numerous evergreens are located throughout the property. 4 . Wildlife : Existing vegetation may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water: No water was observed on the subject site. 6 . Land Use : The site itself is undeveloped. A single family residence is located on the property adjacent to the east . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding properties are either undeveloped or contain single family residences . This is the general pattern observed in the area . G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: An existing 12" water main extends north- south along Union Avenue adjacent to the subject site. Eight inch sanitary sewers are located on Sunset Boulevard N . E . approximately 700 feet south of the site. However , the applicant ha's received a septic tank permit from King County to handle sewage disposal . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance . 3 . Transit: Metro Transit Route 107 operates along Union Avenue S . E . within 1 /4 mile to the south of the subject site . 4. Schools : Sierra Heights Elementary School is approximately 1 /2 mile north of the subject site and McKnight Junior High School is within one mile to the west while Hazen High School is approximately 3/4 mile to the southeast. 5 . Parks : Kiwanis Park located within 3/4 mile to the south of the subject site while North Highlands Park is approximately 1 1 /4 miles to the west. H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-708 , R-2 , Residence Two Family I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Subdivision Ordinance, Section 9-1105 ; Short Subdivisions 2 . Comprehensive Plan , 1965 , Land Use Report, Objective 6 , page 18 . J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : None . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : None . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : VIRGIL GOODEN , FILE NO . SA-222-78 OCTOBER 17 , 1978 PAGE THREE L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and a site map are attached . N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2. City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . 0 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site as medium density multiple family and the R-2 zoning of the site. 2 . The existing lot also exceeds the minimum size requirement for the R-2 zone . 3 . Water service is available on Union Avenue although no sewer line is . Drainage plans will need approval of the Public Works Department . 4 . Restrictive covenants as follows were made part of the Short Plat approval in 1976 to protect adjoining single family homes located primarily to the north . This lot does not adjoin any single family homes . a ) Submittal and approval of detailed landscape plan showing a suitable combination of trees , shrubs and ground cover . b ) The owners agree and covenant that not more than 2 duplex units may be constructed and maintained on the said premises for the duration of the covenants . c ) The site plans including landscape plans for any new buildings or structures shall be reviewed and approved by the Hearing Examiner . d ) The covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 1999 . 5 . The applicant has yet to provide a landscaping plan for this development . P . PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval of the site plans subject to : 1 . Providing the off-site improvements of curb , gutter , side- walk , and paving as required by the Engineering Department . 2 . Final Public Works Department approval of utilities and storm drainage plans . 3 . Compliance with the restrictive covenants made a part of the Short Plat approval in 1976 including final approval of landscaping plans by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit . 4. Final approval of the building plans by the Building Division . ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department OPolice Department 01) Public Works Department '--)-e-4.-er-41:?2t!tg-- 4) Building Div . 0 Engineering Div. (Please verify legal description it Traffic Engineering Div . 49) Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) VAv( i l /,1,ii1 DATE : 0b PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : REZONE MAJOR PLAT V SITE APPROVAL -ASHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT C //)J6WITHANYCOMMENTSYOUMIGHTHAVE , BEFORE i REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : RE.4")' ApprovedNot Approved Comments or conditions : p- zd'- a Signature o irector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : -/ C' m Approved Q NotApprove Comments or conditions : yam Signature f Director or uthori ed Representative ate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : E:;.< p Approved LJ Not Approved Comments or conditions : n e = Tt:. /h7r 7 P.7 S 1"f tt /"'ref G l! '" YJ/C.1s.c H•. /7'CJ j ILCAt4 <1 t4 s : t J .'- l. j p z. t,< / ".e} S d-,...„ i 1 - Z - Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Dies tment : L TIL. , Approved En Not Approved Comments or conditions : 1 O l a--/ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : D.e ems ,partment : Approved d Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department III Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department QPublic Works Department 8 Building Div. Engineering Div . 2) Traffic Engineering Div. Q Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee) VAX r &ofitta 1107176 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- M Ad1;12 ; Application No . : 24.1.'' Action Name :r0 I ul& Uk/lnAJ 4Ut1 Nb , leovai Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : atr & ) 9?? Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 4!=1) ti Approved I [ Not Approved Comments : G- '- 66-- -- ----AC - 4'e'r — / fe---01---Z--- 232-----)„,) Signature of Direc r or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1//e_ CoommentsppAroved Li Not Approved r-- Th Signature of Directo( 777 F Authorized Rep esentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : i?e/,%ter,4„ 0 Approved Not Appro/d Comments :t Ak) '5,711 A e-pt T /n')pdtiT eli o- 2 - 7C Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : r/ -- 7-,2 7/1); C .c c' r i `'`1 0 Approved 11 Not Approved Comments : A,/c • _ (9 ,7/ /.: v - 2 , -_-'(-le,eSignatureofDirectororAuthorizedRepresentatiaDate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C Approved Wl Not Approved Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : J Approved 1JJ of Approved Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date att.. L..... 1 `.....,1 1 _) .._•7-1•, O...'I _-.. ri..6 0 fearoici,t.,,,i,[...1.zilt. 4.), 6••••lb: t a I ''`•-_-.. . ..i 1 . .Pip ,...,. ./..-vi,,-. 7•.•MI 7/.6 AD 7 c i ' ' t J I 1 : t r__y,i . ' ! It '••wEyize© f» tt't.,e j, 6 2 P•W a 1 w 11 I 1 ra• Lt;.I _Z ! 4 S G•7•'gl,n • :.,•.i14.a1„i.• 113 G . 1 r Apili." ;n ---- 1------------ ii— vifip B4 G1 7 Ait.,S r--, . . R-3 o R-3 46 rl •i. 1t• ` s2 r 3 ( s 1. „~ •1 • ors, 1 .......... ... .`. .4.- F_-^4.. o' T la V.5 --1 ..........."" ".1•r a 111 a +l Z .,r.: • r to :1 a s.=^ i_ mac. •; ( t .. i • o • /,• • S. -'-;+!••'r • •.... . r . i III• 1.,_. pe%.%eft tt 7 i tit •2: 1; :.":1 n i ems: y... ...p. ,J.L. t.J•7 I ii J '-' l .0 ' R_1 , 'Ys";a r_ z •' I if. J 11`T .. r..• • ilk, `J.,•Ilf: N—•r••••.• f r... • ,.• f _ r: 10. Wit. t- • t,.y 1.1....11 . "''."'• 4:'_- jr-lt-!311 ;1/-""" Li..! ,j,12 1,6 ,, ..! • , 0.,C _.us A,.•-tIM- v,o1,•..m.ma, : r,.-..-.. 3-.- 7...•-.• 7. . _ ,..• 1/....... Y 1.-..2..4L-A7f- I,, L..-„..„,'.'-. -.: ., . -. . G-7200 lam; 7711 1 SA-222-78 VIRGIL GOODEN : Application for site approval in an R-2 zone ; property located in the vicinity of 1550 Union Avenue N . E . APPLICANT VIRGIL GOODEN TOTAL AREA9130+ square feet PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Union Avenue N . E . EX! SLING ZONING R-2 , Residential Two Family EXISTING USE Vacant PROPOSED USE Duplex COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Low Density Multiple Family COMMENTS Site Approval required by restrictive covenants of prior Short Plat . PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No .SA-222'78 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 388-78 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal The applicant requests site approval for a modular duplex dwelling in an R-2 , Residential Two Family District . Proponent VIRGIL GOODEN Location of Proposal VICINITY OF 1550 Union Avenue N . E . Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision wasmadeafterreviewbytheleadagencyofacompletedenvironmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental Non-Reasons Minimum disturbance of the site and surrounding area . The declaration is based upon preservation of any significant trees on the subject property without prior consideration and approval by the Planning Department . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency wouldwithdrawitsdeclarationofsignificanceandissuea (proposed/final )declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Michael L . Smith (For Gordon Y . Ericksen ) Title Senior lanner (f P a ning Dir. ) Date October 12 , 1978 Signature ich,ael L . Smit City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 DECLARATION OF RESTR I CT I Vl CUVLi,r u,T,S WHEREAS, Robert C. Jackson and Kay L . Jackson , his wife , are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington , des - cribed as follows : i the N . 255 ft . of the E . 342 ft . of the W. 372 ft . of the SW'4 of the SW of Sec . 3 , T23N , R5E W . P . in King County Washington , except the E . 125 ft . thereof . WHEREAS, the owners of said described property desire to impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the above des- cribed real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish , grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs , and assigns , as follows : LANDSCAPED BUFFER AREAS The first twenty-five ( 25 ) feet adjacent to the northern property line shall he maintained as a landscaped buffer area . The existing natural vegetation shall be maintained and incorporated with additional trees , shrubs and groundccver throughout the site as necessary to provide an effective screen and retain the natural character of the site . A landscape plan for the site designating existing and proposed plant material shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department . Any changes in landscaping shall be subject to the review and approval of the City of Renton Planning Department . An installation and three year maintenance bond shall he provided to the City in the amount of 15U`%, of the cost of installation and maintenance . SETBACKS No structure of building shall be permitted or located within twenty-five (25 ) feet of the northern property line . RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER OCT 171978 EXHIBIT NO. S AM PM 71Rt9t10111s121112r314 e516 ITEM NO. ,5/y- z - 7s. SLILhIVI SIGN The property shall be subdivided 11110 no Nore thdn three ( 3 ) legal lots . BUILDINGS The owners further agree and covenant that not more than two duplex units be constructed and maintained on the above described premises for the duration of these covenants . v SITE PLAN APPROVAL The site plans including landscape plans for any new buildings or structures shall be reviewed and approved by the Renton Planning Commission . d-At+ U:rz-- DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 1999 . These covenants shall remain in full force and effect , unless otherwise changed or amended by all parties in writing , with the approval of the City Council of the City of Renton . Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by such breach . t i/ Robert •A .! Jackson z t)Iy I_ v',racksoit STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING On this 26 r/,, day of 7,' l 975 , before me personally appeared i) ,.'f74" C. Nl,«r.,/.s„,-/ anda , • T Ini the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument , and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed o.f said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year firs;t. bove written . t+ Notary Public i C- for Th.9 State of Washington , L - , r•,.c_____ CITY OF RENTON RECEDED 2APPLICATION SEP 14 1978 SITE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 41 G N PR File No. SA- a( 7d Filing Date G OEi,,/ Application Fee $ /G'/• i 6 Receipt No . 6 /3 Environmental Review Fee $e% /D APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 • 1" 1i AL), 2 2 5 7 77r' 1. Name MA-, r 0OQ , Phone -Z Address 1703 Se' A24/ imxi-EY /S%, / 2 . Property location l j..CO Jit) t 0rU 47/ 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) r)/f f', Xv se() iy s// ¢3 a Tie ,r a 7/J P.s' s k, c 6 Lv Za-kr i 4 . Number of acres or square feet 7 6 7t Present zoning 4— 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? J 4- i 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan . . . . 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. Rev. 1-77 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM RECEIVED )6 SEP 14 1978- 16 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 9 Application No. 70 NG DEPPe Environmental Checklist No. ,4:77 PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: 0 Declaration of Significance 0 Declaration of Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, oith- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on t) the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 527 0 -3 s4 "it i9, 4/Z ;7: -7/57 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist 5. Name of proposal , if ap licable: 11"- 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of i s scope and nature) : 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal . as well as try ± extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any ocher information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : 41; 41..-....eig?".• 441.4 elfIC'-44. •-et#12--r-A0--e-0 4.--e-or -rti----).----,---4` 1 i 8. Estir ,ted date for completion of the p oposal : J Y ? 9. List if all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposalfede •al , stat and local --including rezones) : 10. Do o , have any ans for future additions , expansion, or further activity re at ,d to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: N d 11. Do yo know of any plans byothers which mayaffectafeet the property covered byyourroposal ? If yes , explain: rip 12. Attac any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posa if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some futuredatedescribethenatureofsuchapplicationform: II . ENVIRONME AL IMPACTS Expi. nations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Eartt Will the proposal result in: a) instable earth conditions or in changes in geologic ubstructures? YES MAYBE 4<c b) lisruptions, displacements , compaction or over- vering of the soil ? YES MAYBE 0 ` c) ; gange in topography or ground surface relief iaatures? PEA I >r N1 . d) lie destruction, covering or modification of any clique geologic or physical features? TES-- MAYBE `NS e) I ,y increase in wind or water erosion of soils , Either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO f) Clanges in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which a ,y modify the channel of a river or stream or the Gad of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Expla-, ition: Pam— MAYBE NO 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MTrBE n b) The creation of objectionable odors? C Y MAYBE `a c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or Any change in climate, either locally or regionally? V MAYBE )g47 Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements. in either marine or fresh waters? Y MA BE N b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? Y MAYBE c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE h d) Change 1n the amount of surface water in any water body? YET— MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE N f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? VET MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE h, Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? VT MAYBE NO i Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Yl MAYBE It:‘ Explanation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass, crops . microflora and aquatic plants)? M b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? Yam' MAYBE FZ1 c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area. or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Yl:s- air my- d) Reduction In acreage of any agricultural crop? q YT R U Explanation: O J K-Q. i42-11-tr4- 7_ 4- 5) F« ,na. Will the proposal result in: a ) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? 1 YES MAYBE NO k ) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MBE 0 C . Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? PEA MAYBE N d Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? fYEE— WAYNE NO E. )lanation: 6) Nc, se. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Ex ,lanation: 7) Ll iht and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or gl .re? YES MAYBE fg— EA lanation: 8) L d Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the pr sent or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE N E, lanation: 9) N, ural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO t, Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE N Ex lanation: 10) Ri k of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an ex Tosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, bu not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE N Ex lanation: 11) Pc ulation. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bu ion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Pam— MAYBE Ex lanation: 5- 12) H ,using. Will the proposal affect existing housing. or c •eate a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO E .planation: 13) T ansportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NOEffectsonexistingparkingfacilities , or demand for new parking? YES M YBE NO Impact upon existing transportation systems? Y3- MAYBE N0— Alterations to present patterns of circulation er movement of people and/or goods? . YE gully NO f ) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Yam- MAYBE 4 Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE N E. planation: 14) Plulic Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or r, suTt in a need for new or altered governmental services it any of the following areas : Fire protection? YEY— MAYBE N I ) Police protection? YES MAYBE r I Schools? YES MAYBE NO r ) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO t ) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO t ) lther governmental services? YES MAYBE NO` E„lanation: 15) ErLat. Will the proposal result in: a Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require he development of new sources of energy? Tr T- MAYBE NO Ex .lanation: 16) Ut lities. Will the proposal result in a need for new sy tems, or alterations to the following utilities : a Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE N b Communications systems? YES WAITE NO c Water? YES MAYBE NO. T.. 6- d Sewer or septic tanks? YE MAYBE 0 e Storm water drainage?YE RATTE" Nb— f Solid waste and disposal ? YES MAYBE NO Exl lanation: 17) Huran Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of an health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mer tal health)? YE MAY6t Exi lanation: 18) Ae thetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of an_ scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive xsieopentopublicview? YES MAYBE NO Ex lanation: 19) Re reation. Will the proposal result in an 4mpact upon the qu lity or quantity of existing recreational ,opportunities? YES MAYBE Ex lanation: 20) P.r heological Historical . Will the proposal result in an aT eration of a significant archeological or historical si e, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Ex lanation: III. S16NATUr E I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration rf non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there b, any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of f sclosure on my part. Proponent: signed lK/T' i 2Oo 47 / name Printed City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 OF R E/V. o AFFIDAVIT U 4 191% 1- SEp1lVt, 1, l 44, G Q® being duly sworri,Vicitctll that I am the owner of the property involved in this application acid-t-hat` the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this day of 19 N tary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Name of Notary Public) Signa ure of Owner Address) Zdress?O S S6 4i, y(, 4y sS (4 /7 /'t _ City) State) Z Z -- 4!7.s 7Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has bee:. found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing tie filing of such application . Date Receivc d 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 c. ,.. ., o• :., r Si . .. 1-1(1‘. . C 't. , • C.. :•:. •t•. : •.• r P. n \ i.„1-.. z.- `c,' -`• tU • 1()1Z, DIVISION OF ENVk, •,. i,F1N1+.4E AI. HEALTH SERVICES E APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTFM liv, : '. „:.,•,• r•I; . ',i1.•• T. •,.--/y!,,• 1•1:1,7,,,,./...riIi?,:ily",u;icsing Dorrnit divi,... 0..„, If. '. i•.• •,•: .rori,..,,t, t:. •,"4, isstia.fi 44 e,, thp Indivicludi Sewvai,.• D,yr,osa: C. :•,-......- 2'.---- SCUTHT.::::.," - r.f,.,4. - ,-. ..... c;- if til,. prop,•rty ;s wohin fl-: LhAiria,itt.,,, (.1 0,. .:; , r..; .,,,; .,..A., -1.,,tri, • or • Mt?! sower my dutticiitt‘,",-M'Art.04-45;rikiies- I.‘ to °worn written rogn:ISSIOn r()."r: tk. 11 .1•.ttlio,: . ..I•,v,r.. no .0;.• (It if! ,I1r :...i(hal sPwage disposal systPm. l_txsiri.,r- (a Prc )ort,,e-Street Addrvss i_17-57.2. .k;AiZelli) • i'_.k:A:. Addticio or Sie,Olvision C4g5 4. _ -4 ....:!:: .,i......1.2..•I!..).L4'-' - Lot Block 111dCr. '"gal description) t• ,,t 13,-1,r,ii• r•Jew ,....,„.-k.; .. i 0-I.% P.,-,,,10,1,-.• iN.o. 94-tdrc:Dins ‘'Y I. ' ' l.:.1...t..ip r *0°7!>: •C.:'. 1600 N.E '5.•1‘) --1)->1'.,:• 363-4765 i .,• ". ,:!.• 15607 N.E Aol iv...A.-is...0-,.:".: ; •.! r;.•: - 1.:.•• :),1,-.',1.4 885-127 or 747-1 76r. 1,! 3001 N.E. 4th Street, 4en!,••;-. lei":,!.., 228-26?1. f.• 10821 8th S.W .s>'.111f.) r.• 21211 1 st N.A 1,*. 14..1 -i 583.4.1.1"2 pi-;r!' #1) e-e Yr t:" : 4,1'1"-• .- 1-.4---.4.-----.1-1-.J..e.. ..C_Z..i..2_ r ,•••____.10. G rei P:1d.Z.d li t?../.12/.1 . I ,t v-Zit, , -,1. Phone 1 2:3_,.."X__ ;.i..4:-..::_s`17- 1.,.•7__ L_ct_14:.t"e)4 _4.-)1ia_zi-e:::: _.._ 11r7.. ..Z..''*..4.1-_________ P.•or- -%--Sr Si ',.•,':.: .1...,”... .....••• itit.soils 44,;,.01.1.ter..ii pretprdhly,:-, i •,,•'!. , ,iii,, rm -..":11 ....15•;..f ,it1r ,..ST.:^' hil.rlIrldr," fi'l't1 •Ii.5 irw:r•f25 c,.•• ..t" .! _. _ .12___ ..::-..7_,-.1 el_ , 4 c_l i. 1.-...,..-,,•: t-14;i.• .‘, , !_j_a____...—t....f ..._,..,L 1iv ,i..••:•t• or W-,to fable. o ei,..•.,019-a. ,.i. 01• ;:a.....• r• . , ..,.4.. - ,,• I:.•• .2.,,,,, L 1;c•..---• i• th.;"••-•;:le Water Supti!y—.-,... k 1:I.. 4.::: .. •f,...),..1 "ti - ..)--- 4., . ::.,, •••.,::.., .1,1; in miliu:os :Jr" 1 r•.,I', .o,..t;,:1* .., •.,. .•, •' ?1 ,: ' , • 710;1•11 , 4....".1.7.:_l•-•ist!.• LonClIti (if tin'' Sod....(1, I . I I2--- -----4---- - -- :pi. it)i d/i I-1 1.2-4e e._...:„:_r_r it. !. ...i.. 4 • 7, : - --..a.-- C._ -.- ..... . 4 ,t• 7:<\ .. 1.,..-__ . :: e_•;42-21_4_,_ ,.... f..._.:_t_- .-.—._ ir - -- - I . . i • : • ., .., r.a, .,,,i0, or . 0...!ht 1..., att../ ., '••!•-• ' .1.....•••.. 'Pti....', ar•:,o.1 drdo,i•.,; o, •evers4) side c•• i.,::, . •• ..• . i. . 41 z D• '..... .%,•'.!- P.'-',..-;i'. T :t; , .\;. . I.. 1•i• 4. - : ,• '; •• • " -,• • c! • ' 211.:!,1, • .,.,t..,i. .',... Z?9, 7-Z.41._. le.-Ze_ti..4e-41,41-44/teeettle 106,14Aceice . _C.X.173Z. IP:te..."-O' '-‘4''e_ ---- 7- 7 / t• A of Rk-4,k'------- „rn 11,- % fla,n11 tb r() sEP 1 4 1978 i.. 11/4.„. 1.4.-........................4.....+,, z. v G DEPt.+ 4 77-7,17:7...-7.4.Z. 7,17-...7,74:'''...•,,,:e.•,‘,-0.....•4.,‘;„.,;..,;.-,7• -1.Es.f.".f0:A.. ,.. .....,•, 24...t.iL-.4..±Itiv.e.F.•.!)1..,....;.•,„-.4.....i,,.... i:„,-: :.-;....•-•,-. 7*.,7'-,-.;??E.•;.-,..V-76;•7,, '•7••&...1,!:•lIgi- A,.. 4/1 5.4t.I rl•V...'-',Atie,"44••::'4.4.0• ..d':• 124!;.i'.:44%,'!"l'A71t-r'Ill:i4:41 e''......,•14." •' ...•'...'4 '-'...'1,; '''.ts-4-i'I'' ..., ....• -•-• ' - .4 r----•‘a.%•*-V%•441‘4,-"forl-' 1•- •.',*-:...^-4e;t4: • Ast-:.07,4"-_,. ..."•••4•C"-'1:6;iFV•f*"• *'• .-t-4.‘4:41 1' -k•.-......-:I., .,\.. •1"11k• • .C.,..' - 1.' '4 ,4••• ..• .sr,:.-....•.• i . • - „AA-ft...46 `• .. 4'..-4.4 ii„,- * •• ' ' -- 1-*a,.!4.4 '-,--.:-', . -.Ai,.A e 4.4 c.44y..P1• ••-, ,"54 1.,-,,. .C. •' 4 4'..Z.• : 1. - .• 41i-•••••• t14, -;•:.'1'14-•....._'....4,;•"'IV,:., f" ‘ '.;',. S.' i i•••‘‘..',;• ;:li-{:.;'',..:Z4.e%Ci.• ..:f';';'''' -'''••• . 7' It'.; . Cl;.... '-• -..''.."--* {..1.''.?".‘.'.E67'.'..'';$;-:.:** •.,• " " ':WC;;•.*•er:114-1, _,•-...i,t• 7z,p,-:at>) • t4,2 .;..- . _ t-.. ..,.: :.....i. i„ •:,:,... ....v: . -7*Tfli7. .. 7:, '. ' .: ::.:,.-,t .i... • •. , ,,,,,,_.• • _ . ?. ,,, A.,t„..0..,..,,,,,,•,,..........-4s..4,.,;,?..)...,,,e.14,-.‘„0",„.t.1„,....v,,-.:11.,4,‘ iors. 14•4 4; -'' • : ''• . •,. ir••''.'".• s''''''''.. 4 'Ct.': i'41-. 4 4:4•N•..‘'. 14-4`!4:-...41•/*„..•••e4.1.:Stii;rvi'' • • il-".if...... .1•',..•....•.;,•'4'..5:4' t' ;"' i • --"Z.‘• ,, •.' '.:'•-'4 ...4. -...Z.:-.1;1- t_.•:‘..,..14.:fre-f.t.i.;:etrli. 46?...,2itil.4. 2,-,' ' ... ,..' 4•4:X.4r •4 9, m"X'-' . - --. - ,!- - -: - 4,... --:.-.-..:!...- ,•-•:,.0„il.',.-e!---....,..;71,:x.:4t„....,:iiilt.--4'15'41,t-pa• Af.-,,,: k. 4..i,,b• ce.i.4. ..-!73 .7' -4.-.•-•;;A:•„,•••••. - ,.-, . .-7,••• 3. -4 *g.:01.":„:-...t imi •*•-•11.'A,./im,•:•••?.7' .- ...,-• ,, 2,--..,- :•!• ..-- --4.---••••••• :.,.. 7 . . ,it' ,.,...._' ..,•-="e, -?41 "'1 ..qt,,,it,,,. ,,,•-4.:-.•.1.!°1(:...e ...;:,••41.".:!•••' 00.,,k. .." • ... ..,. ,.- •4 t....,.... ', : •.....',.. , ' `• . , • 4 . I4, -,..-^..14-.,-'.i.- •7.4id:.Thlt. '.-Air!.fig.-,:di,. / ''. - ,. .. ...4314.14:114 .. r ''''. 4•.' -• 4' ;;. 4\ '... " .. ......-•;-,"4.,i;;;;.7r.-f-.-.T..-i--.7F-;;;-'4.:".17.:,. ;el-0-'4'4.7'.5.; is _,:fitilt,..4.4rilif42/17 p; r. ,.• --4t-,-,-''*- .*:. .-'i....irfl- ''.f--,--,?irifiti;i-- -*it-4i- z -:. . -.-.", . .., .. . , - - : . - .,. .,/ a' . ' • --•" '---'.%-*-'.1 • N-' . N. a'?'i : - y,r-•.• i..„. I•',",•,'•.•.'..'...',.. ".:,'.‘-'.- 6.•.: 7:,.::"'. 4,.';. S:s 1r,!':.''..'.'',.,.;, ..• it,;irl.'.-to s' o•' ,,' i'A4sti r'.& 4A-,i. 7 1i l* 0 t- 1." 4% ) ... ;, :*...; .! s1,P.-.1...-.:','-:..-. 9.-1-'.•%. a..:*.-.":-•. Z.',:.- N.- t...k*..:;:: t 1--.:.' P- s't.y",•,,'-,'..'.A'!, s',s4W.,h,-. t.:•.- lu: s. i'..itt, i..._',w'/'' S1.',.;.,tr',.-i'..'. W:,._r1,.,.,?.''_'g_.'.,i.,.:,.. 1,.W-.- 4. 44,,k--.-,411%: Ass. s, l,,. it..i• -., f,': ss1kfe / Thi4 l • f ‘ ii M I11 g,.;-..: . . ,..r':-' •-.' •:ti,,_•.?:-.1', ,Z17"A., ;(,g.'li-A- V,6-..75'.'1'-ig„i..W,-7%-:i7. 2;W a) -.•!'4."' r r4 .*.sAi' 7:1'1, 1s:i r..4 . 4 14.1,1 p P.Tig-,,-....-.•7‘••••:- --',,,W,:t4..e•,':;•,,r,...;;4:- ...r:.4. .;.•!".,,,, ,c.. 474,,:,,,,,--:.7,,,,,:-.*:•,..•,,f'_ttsa,..,.4.7i.,,,:•..t.• ., - .,-...,--L--..•r,. -a.: 1.A:se.-.,s., ,,,,1/4-...,--e.- - it/A 5:er/ .L#'.-:',$) 11 it.rf..- ,.(' :--, ,i , ..•,, 1.,7 3.' .-.,.. .1*-i.,:""i# "::, ',',",'-••.... 1%."7-4-'+- elri-.' „;.?,''''':.1:. -",.;_',f:4' t4 i),...,... .. • .,... . ••,- •- 1.--.• . 4.4 f.t„, btatst, 4,'• -• ..,:af:0-ilfilitt-*r.,1't.,.--!-,:•,...: . 4.).0,4.-i'e.-:. , .77,,,ve... .-.,- %....‘_.. r .-o..."+••• .-. 1,.•, ,,:-. 1:..A.,14a..r.,,pge,• _ _ ..4 .,,, . *.1...... .,,,,;.!4;;.:ita. ..;A...0,e-. ,-...'.•.,• n-• -, t•„•; D-. 1.- 4.-' oT.-ft... I.• 4'-..;•';7.'.' 5..1o. i. rd?4t, '.,,"../..i4..,.......;,....,,",.,4...,::: I.•.';...-.-.7-. 77::,f. .‘:. d,..‘. 1:A1::,., 4:'--''.,!;•9..?;;,..-• t. 0,-: 2,:-, 7•. S.., k. 1:. 4.,--;.%. i,27..e1N.- 0r4,. r„. 1....",. xi,;... w4...--•k.-.-,=.';-.,-.•,;.,440 4t, 4..:•': 2.4... o"., N: f-...t i, 4; h . e 3 Fi 4t-4 4..,:';''44,:•:41,..:...-*I141f. Ali. - ,,,-- - - -* .( i:','•7 . ''. -`--4.•-'•-• - - . . I* '4:4 1-.-.2., .;',54:.". -•Y:faZi*.f*44.-f''-';',It.!•'..._•-•t, 1,10.r!.:40.1...4-_, !•••$•-.-ii.,..._ ,..-.:.;.-•••_i.o, .0...e.-:.;;!... T.:....-a •-..tio-tc...F....-c*.:......6111--....1.•., t,lit•-;-.-' -'''', 4 t .,,.:,,,t• • . f."'-'• .•••i.,-1--- "4',4.•;IA.'t.: :,-.‘4.•• - '--.•.'''s zi-,-.1.4••-foel;t..V`-•r. i- .' '' --- . •• 1•'.*-:- ' •-• ''.!' r.I'''''.',- cl'-' `.;74,...7.1 - 7...:_‘•,,.; I:" • -.. 1 ....., :..'. .!'.: , -'. `' . , - .;..,-''..1 :,.. :'• r.,...- .,:••., ,'%--f3;PkV.Y.fl, ,Zr-:-:, ''TC, '•••,-5C '' ' :1..1'..: ::'/.4'. ' .7- ; %."....?. •1;;Z%1 i ' --%;.;:$ 7^1.t.:1‘•••.*1.''..:."Z.P.r.t&L'''-i.... I"''..".- Vt:.' 4 -..if-oi-•. • ..",;:t• -.:'-','-',;.---.;.;. :-.!' ''.,. .;. -,;.•''-‘-,,: ...., t,.., ..,..,.,-....,1-,,,:....;;,..e„- s,„4,--.03.,- .; -;,-.:TT. .:. .-_-z'- ; ••••,, .".;--.. -a:: •;,;.,: -.:: i;44,,.... =-: ".:,.1.1--,..::.4z,-T.~44.-.;:r): 17-----,.' e.r..1.•:::;-.-`,"'r, 4'' ' i .. - "-', Lt,.;,,_,,,_t-:;',...r."t)444.T.,, ..„,„. ,:...:-.,.....--._r...,..4...,..4. .-2,..„,...,......,.::..., ,.... 4''''`' '''' - RE.,pq cT ' - s 'H.ET . 4 .."/..1-1.-4•• "::4,Y..47-4-4,....,,....104..i;',.1'..."4.,2:,':.742',T..... .1:- ., '... .,, •,. ".," '''.''' I....7,-. .•' ..;•;:4, .•-•i..,.„.t•.1.4.v.a'ALI,..4.01'i.04 v 1....,: N.,.•i. A •,f,„..e. 44 ....t.o-rt4--;i...: ,;,,,, .ii.,1.4,1.1, x-. t,•,:.•••••••t ,...:\•,•••1, •!•: : Ii...-_ V.',••••_...3.:" iv. ki......,;,..,...4,,i.1-.1.,r43-..1".•,.,r....3/,•-•41114,••: L i..... INI .A 7-SCAt:E ':-.---:.'57.-.:,‘,.---'-- T' . =••••: -".4' i'21 .•'-. ;V7''' '1....,•.:'•'.2•-...-'': e• 4 felt' .' Z. 4.4:14.-.. 4.0.....“-..4."^".•'•4...... ..., " :4 • . 4•'.•1.'11'4'4,-1.rc,..f.:- •• .-"....e.-?••I 4--*..•1 • . ••3---....il,.. .,‘ &;.1 or 4 kev 41 THE CITY OF RENTON V 0` 4 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 n F ` CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT Q. 235- 2550 fo SEP1 O Mr . Virgil Gooden 18703 S . E . May Valley Road Issaquah . Washington 98027 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL IN THE R-2 ZONE : property located in the vicinity of 1550 Union Avenue N . E . File No . SA-222-78 Dear Mr . Gooden : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on September 14 , 1978 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set. for October 17 , 1978 at 9 : 00 a .m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235- 2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Pl anni ny'Di rector 7? BY : ( 7:7"Yati(e:141idR . tlem ns Associate Planner NU I I LL UI I'UHL I L I ILllk I N( RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HLLD BY THE RENTON l AND USE HEARING EXAMINER Al HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON OCTOBER 17 19 78 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . VIRGIL GOODEN , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL IN AN R-2 ZONE ; File No . SA-222-78 ; property located in the vicinity of 1550 Union Avenue N . E . 2 . PUGET WESTERN , INC . , APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF 101 -LOT SUBDIVISION ; File No . PP-223-78 , property located near Royal Hills Drive S . E . and Lake Youngs Way S . E . 3 . DEVELOPMENT COORDINATORS , INC . , TIFFANY PARK DIVISION NO . 3 ; FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR 34 LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SUBDIVISION ; File No . FP-233-78 ; property located 1 /2 mile east of east end of Puget Drive S . E . , just north of Seattle ' s Cedar River Pipeline Right-of-Way , directly east of park (Tiffany Park ) . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT IIIS PUBLIC HEARING ON OCTOBER 17 , 1978 AT 9 : 00 A . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED October 6 , 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , on the 'Al day of ( c-p`,n_ 19 I1 SIGNED 21/(44_4_ell PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER OCTOBER 17 , 1978 APPLICANT : VIRGIL GOODEN FILE NO : SA-222-78 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST : The applicant requests site approval for a modular duplex dwelling in an R-2 , Residential Two Family District. B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : VIRGIL GOODEN 2 . Applicant : VIRGIL GOODEN 3. Location :Vicinity of 1550 Union Ave. N . E. 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property: 9 , 130 square feet 6. Access : Via Union Avenue N . E . 7 . Existing Zoning : R-2 , Residential Two Family ; Medium lot size of 7200 square feet. 8 . Existing Zoning in the G-7200 , Residential Single area :Family; R-2 , Residential Two Family; R-3 , Residential Multiple Family ; B-1 , Business Use . 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Medium Density Multiple Family 10. Notification :The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST : To allow construction of a modular duplex building on the site. D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No . 2472 dated March 28, 1969 . It was subsequently rezoned to R-2 by Ordinance No . 2939 dated July 7 , 1975 , and short-platted as of recording date on January 23 , 1976 . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level with a slight rise to the east at approximately a 3 . 5% slope . 2. . Soils : Arents Alderwood material , 6-15% slopes (AmC ) . Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is moderate to severe. This soil is used for urban development. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : VIRGIL GOODEN , FILE NO. SA-222-78 OCTOBER 17 , 1978 PAGE TWO 3 . Vegetation: Ground cover consists principally of short grass with some minor shrubs . Numerous evergreens are located throughout the property. 4 . Wildlife : Existing vegetation may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: No water was observed on the subject site . 6 . Land Use : The site itself is undeveloped . A single family residence is located on the property adjacent to the east . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are either undeveloped or contain single family residences . This is the general pattern observed in the area . G. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: An existing 12" water main extends north- south along Union Avenue adjacent to the subject site. Eight inch sanitary sewers are located on Sunset Boulevard N . E . approximately 700 feet south of the site. However , the applicant ha's received a septic tank permit from King County to handle sewage disposal . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance . 3 . Transit: Metro Transit Route 107 operates along Union Avenue S . E . within 1 /4 mile to the south of the subject site . 4 .. Schools : Sierra Heights Elementary School is approximately 1 /2 mile north of the subject site and McKnight Junior High School is within one mile to the west while Hazen High School is approximately 3/4 mile to the southeast. 5 . Parks : Kiwanis Park located within 3/4 mile to the south of the subject site while North Highlands Park is approximately 1 1 /4 miles to the west. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-708 , R-2 , Residence Two Family I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105 ; Short Subdivisions 2 . Comprehensive Plan , 1965 , Land Use Report , Objective 6 , page 18 . J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : None . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : None . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : VIRGIL GOODEN , FILE NO . SA-222-78 OCTOBER 17 , 1978 PAGE THREE L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and a site map are attached . N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site as medium density multiple family and the R-2 zoning of the site. 2 . The existing lot also exceeds the minimum size requirement for the R-2 zone . 3 . Water service is available on Union Avenue although no sewer line is . Drainage plans will need approval of the Public Works Department. 4 . Restrictive covenants as follows were made part of the Short Plat approval in 1976 to protect adjoining single family homes located primarily to the north . This lot does not adjoin any single family homes . a ) Submittal and approval of detailed landscape plan showing a suitable combination of trees , shrubs and ground cover. b ) The owners agree and covenant that not more than 2 duplex units may be constructed and maintained on the said premises for the duration of the covenants . c ) The site plans including landscape plans for any new buildings or structures shall be reviewed and approved by the Hearing Examiner . d ) The covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 1999 . 5 . The applicant has yet to provide a landscaping plan for this development . P . PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval of the site plans subject to : 1 . Providing the off-site improvements of curb , gutter, side- walk , and paving as required by the Engineering Department . 2 . Final Public Works Department approval of utilities and storm drainage plans . 3 . Compliance with the restrictive covenants made a part of the Short Plat approval in 1976 including final approval of landscaping plans by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit . 4 . Final approval of the building plans by the Building Division . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : a Department : E< // . Q Approved OM Not Approved Comments or conditions : 8/7' / ! 1,1-) c, l!e .7 f5 f^f'/ Lt /-?%. G' ic; " A.-) Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Dep rtment : Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : 1 O Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Jic 11 " t I -t ( i Approved p Not Approved Comments or conditions : A;0 •.fl < %c Lct 7 1 tZ.(79.:2 f- 1, • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C Approved O Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : O Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department OPublic Works Department 8 Building Div. Engineering Div. OTraffic Engineering Div. 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) vAvit) r 2(giffa Vo7/76 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- W--.6 ; Application No . : 22 -?13 Action Name : OP,X - iw t1(,fee. (NlaAJ 14,11 . ,XJ . Please review the attached. Review requested by (date ) : eC t f010?7 Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Z-7) i Approved f INot Approved Comments : C()"-- 66-L- (----4ce.jc- aL.....___ Signature of Direc r or Authorized Representative Date c REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1 I/C Comm Approved 0 Not Approved ents : 1 7 , 6t___77 / 7/7 /1 Signature of Directo o4' Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : iii e-ii-1.- B Approved JrNot Approj d Comments : o- 2 - 7c Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :2 / ); e- Q Approved fJ Not ApprovedComments : LvZ D /D Signature of Director or Authorized Representati a Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : D_tpartment : 1. 1 Approved FI Not Approved Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Approved F-1 Not Approved Commen s : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date KIM' V;,.il '.., ' "q'.--.'...•4,0','. ..1:-.7i7.-4 e *, iir-...I w G 00J I Ott/ I I 1 4iff o feoro.Av 41 1.1 i ed..11.. V V 5 T 1 i a . 7 K pgr 1 t, - , 1 i'•r i / mime •m i..' 4_..riy s GAT s's e. , ••• •' SIP Yi lND Qs re Q 1 rsr wv.R3 R-2 3 W t R 3 I 'f ah ,. R_3, 00 . N E 11+>.V.L . • { • .- 3-1 nay -• r'....'.._.• i.IYL.•+'' J(O a•'.[y• 0`r V• - f isj,x a. r.ry . Y ; 4or 4 IIJo. • t • i® 5 f W.' 0_ +_•';Vt.'1'•....` f!' -If •.1 •I I. 1. 4 Y 1 N I aG 1 '* t f.,•.• r .•••••_1 2- ' r I.•.'.f4.er: M....r.ma[t . i A . fT _ 1• Z Y. w 1-12,k-.4- "--*--•r--•'- .-f . •g----t GE1531Q • • , _.......4 _. . , rii.y_..4 2• _'- 5. ,.I ate _ __. .-T--. w- •'-,- L• ,•,. -.1 R i C'=lt i> LIMi- •< _ li'" F- • 1• .`._- •_ ` e. .. I GS_Oft till, ST s s:.! in Sj 2 rF SA-222-78 VIRGIL GOODEN : Application for site approval in an R-2 zone ; property located in the vicinity of 1550 Union Avenue N . E . APPLI ;ANT VIRGIL GOODEN TOTAL AREA9130+ square feet r PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Union Avenue N . E . EXISTING ZONING R-2 , Residential Two Family EXISTING USE Vacant PROPOSED USE Duplex COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Low Density Multiple Family COMMENTS Site Approval required by restrictive covenants of prior Short Plat . 3 , : 0 ii 1 0 1 Li ) k...,7- z E - ii 1 N.e.M1 52;_\..... p. t 4E.lq HsT. 1 it Oi. i, --. L7 4IIIII01 A Nue • W R 5 III• i i a CL IUcoE Iilk a r.E L 14It ST• isi•---_I V f}Nib CokT6t AIDE. Ne: II 10.3 1 D D D D 5 ri. , '-;-- _ -6q•_ e% % 74; A• S' c'• r1S-_1*4-4`. MD 411) 1604 1Sbo 2„,,,,a7un,c), i i i1a: I7.4747 lSS4 t,i i. n uisifi Mit J---iSII 1Soo =- ., _ TissbuETPoDigo9 i9r W t44b I4s o oX T/o tk CD1'33 CD c:% f : Das gs' y36 DI`Ioq 61):1- 1 , :1i6 i; a 310 t....".. 0., r. LV.N.e. SU sEr +B r SC44E /"=,ZOO° C1P SUQJecT SITE c:=1 I'IR6/L 600D6/V Sire/,PVR oV#L4*SR-222 78 I PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No .SA-222-78 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . 388-78 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal The applicant requests site approval for a modular duplex dwelling in an R-2 , Residential Two Family District . Proponent VIRGIL GOODEN Location of Proposal VICINITY OF 1550 Union Avenue N . E . Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON This proposal has been determined to have ® not have asinificantadverseimpactupontheenvironment . An EIS 0 isisnotrequiredunderRCW43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision wasmaaafterreviewbytheleadagencyofacompletedenvironmentalchecklistandotherinformationonfilewiththeleadagency . Reasons for declaration of environmental Non-Reasons Minimum disturbance of the site and surrounding area . The declaration is based upon preservation of any significant trees on the subject property without prior consideration and approval by the Planning Department. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate theenvironmentalimpactstosuchanextentthattheleadagencywouldwithdrawitsdeclarationofsignificanceandissuea (proposed/final )declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Michael L . Smith ( For Gordon Y . Ericksen ) Title Senior Tanner (f9r19la Wing Dir. ) October 12 , 1978 7/ Date Signature ichael L . Smit City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 a r 47 v OF FILE FILE TITLE 40) 2 ._ 78