Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-325B Caitvnlli+lra
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
adoioalaAMICROFILMED
OF I
di 0 THE CITY OF RENTONt$
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
n CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD
090 Go, CITY CLERK
o9gr
D SEPT„
t0
September 17 , 1979
rr. Charles Gliege
President, Gliege Corporation
suite 403 , 155 NE 100th Street
Seattle, Wa 98125
Re: Recorded documents restrictive covenants SA 325 79
Dear Sir:
Enclosed please find your copy of the document (s) recorded
with King County Records and on file with the City Clerk' s
Office of Renton.
Very truly yours
CITY OF RENTON
cn rintld, Q.
Delores A. Mead
City Clerk
DAM/db
Enc ( )
5a 3;Zs '79
2
Glieyd ,.orporation
File No. SA-325-79
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
WHEREAS, Gliege Corporation is the owner of the following real property in the
03 City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows:
Lot 4, East Valley Medical Park Short Plat as recorded under Auditor's
File No. 7808151009, Records of King County.
WHEREAS, the owner of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desires
Vto impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present
ca
7, and future, of the property;
NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose
restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove
N described with respect to the use by the undersigned, his successors, heirs and assigns,
rl
a:. follows:
os PRESERVATION OF EXISTING STREAM & RAVINE
The existing stream and ravine area shall be preserved, and no construction, alteration,
c:-earing or stream relocation shall occur within 100 feet of the centerline of the
existing stream, subject to the possible construction of a walking and hiking trail
within the ravine area.
The conveyance of a five-foot easement for the public as a hiking trail is required,
subject to appropriate access, surfacing and grades, through the ravine on the subject
parcel. The location, design, and installation of the easement shall be subject to
a)proval of the Planning and Public Works Departments, City of Renton.
RESTRICTION OF USE
Tie use of this parcel shall be restricted to the plans and designs approved by the
decision of the Hearing Examiner contained in File No. SA-325-79, subject to minor
modifications, but in no way permitting further expansion of the clinic facility
beyond that approved therein.
DURATION
These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any
time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the
covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the
ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further
documentation.
Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by
either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are
adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants.
F.easonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne
ly the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a
udgment in such action.
Charles W. Gliege, President
Gliege Corporation l.!
t-eGL I,
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
COUNTY OF KING
Page One of Two
On this "^ day of^ // ,;, 19/2, before me personally appeared
Charles W. Gliege to be known to be the President of the Gliege Corporation that
executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be
the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes
M
therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument
C for said corporation, and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said
CD
V corporation.
co
C
ON Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
Notar Public in and 1r= State
ofy'i'ngton, residing ina,Q' ).
eer6eyt h wcQ„ (,(113
2-
OF I
o THE CITY OF RENTON
Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
a CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
9 o FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593
P0,
9gTFO SEP1&
August 14, 1979
Mr. Charles Gliege
President, Gliege Corporation
Suite 403, 155 N.E. 100th Street
Seattle, WA 98125
RE : File No. SA-325-79; Gliege Corporation Site Approval.
Dear Mr. Gliege:
This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was
approved subject to restrictive covenants as noted on the Examiner's
Report of June 11, 1979, has not been appealed within the time
period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is
considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective
this date for permanent filing. Restrictive covenants will be
fil€d by the City Clerk with King County.
Sincerely,
Frei J. Kaufman
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department
City Clerk
G1 Corporation
Fi ). SA-325-79
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
WHEREAS, Gliege Corporation is the owner of the following real property in the
City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows:
Lot 4, East Valley Medical Park Short Plat as recorded under Auditor's
File No. 7808151009, Records of King County.
WHEREAS, the owner of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desires
to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present
and future, of the property;
NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose
restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove
described with respect to the use by the undersigned, his successors, heirs and assigns,
as follows:
PRESERVATION OF EXISTING STREAM & RAVINE
The existing stream and ravine area shall be preserved, and no construction, alteration,
clearing or stream relocation shall occur within 100 feet of the centerline of the
existing stream, subject to the possible construction of a walking and hiking trail
within the ravine area.
The conveyance of a five-foot easement for the public as a hiking trail is required,
subject to appropriate access, surfacing and grades, through the ravine on the subject
parcel. The location, design, and installation of the easement shall be subject to
appr)val of the Planning and Public Works Departments, City of Renton.
RESTRICTION OF USE
The Ise of this parcel shall be restricted to the plans and designs approved by the
deci3ion of the Hearing Examiner contained in File No. SA-325-79, subject to minor
modifications, but in no way permitting further expansion of the clinic facility
beyoid that approved therein.
DURATION
These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any
time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the
cove:iants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the
ordiiances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further
documentation.
Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by
either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are
adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants.
Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne
by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a
judgment in such action.
Charles W. Gliege, President
Gliege Corporation
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
COUNYY OF KING
Page One of Two
1 .
On this day of ,ice 19 , before me personally appeared
Charles W. Gliege to be known to be the President of the Gliege Corporation that
executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be
the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes
therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument
for said corporation, and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said
corporation.
Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above
wri ten.
Notar Public in and or the State
of " ngton, residing in ' .t)-
h g ,Lems, V&A, ( 3
2-
OF
1,
o THE CITY OF RENTON
v f > - z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
90 o
FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-25930,
9grEo SEPTE1."
August 1, 1979
Mr. Larry Gibson
3713 Talbot Road South
Renton, WA 98055
RE: Restrictive Covenants for Gliege Corporation; File No. SA-325-79.
Dear Mr. Gibson:
As you are aware, the declaration of restrictive covenants required
as a condition of approval of the site approval request referenced
above must be signed, notarized and filed with King County prior
to finalization of the application.
We would appreciate transmittal of the document to the office of the
Hearing Examiner at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Marilyn 4/Petersen
Hearing Adm. Asst.
OWNERS
L)T #4 EAST VALLEY MEDICAL PARK SHORT PLAT
Llei=„q (2• C2--Q‘144t r/-(-0, - j''',
7,
1:„yErrolR. Alden Robert Schimp
e ,._ 1_1 A00',/, -
R. Ald- Janet L. Schimpf //
A..A. e_Q-144*,_NO-, ,,,f
David L. BA—ebile Carl E. Stracener
Karen H. Burkebile /
i----6
anice M. S racener
y L IS( 4/
Frederick V. Burkebile J se h . Wearn
Violet V. Burkebile Marrianna B. Wearn
i;
A. nie Danserea Irwin Schille.,r
9e2
e T . DanS'ere Babette Sc 'iller
i
S"--1-1(1-4.-
E ene R. Ekblad. avid J. Z iga
Ann B. Ekblad Joseph A. 'MCGe ,
A/c----:" (C- --
M. fred amm Arlen T.C. Au
r
13/i' lr"-g"t
7 A ik_
Sve ranzon Linda Au
fin
In -Li Jo E. 7 lerson
e. ye ,...."
le
x l.r l iD(Pi)
R Vera Anderson
Z ems(t;,-- -2/_, !- N01:(/
MafY Lots Newma
r -1----,,,i-',--if ..,Y,..61,ty"7,---4.....2—...-
ward Sc, efers
Vivian Schaefers
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King
Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon
oath disposes and states:
That on the ilthday of June 1979 , affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope
containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid,
addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled
application or petition.
Subscribed and sworn this day of
19 -,a .
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing at Renton
Application, Petition or Case: Gliege Corporation; SA-325-79
The minutes contain a £AAt of5 the paAti.ea oti necond)
June 11, 1979
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENION
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ,
APPLICANT: Gliege Corporation FILE NO. SA-325-79
LOCATION: Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests site approval for development of a 34,600
square foot medical office facility in a P-1 zone.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions.
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received on
REPORT: April 19, 1979, and the addendum was subsequently received
on May 22, 1979.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application, and field
checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner
conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on April 24, 1979 at 9:40 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building.
David Clemens, Senior Planner, indicated that several issues regarding the proposal will
require resolution to remove the proposed Declaration of Environmental Impact which would
require preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposal. He recommended
that the hearing be continued to May 22, 1979, to allow appropriate review of the matter.
The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in the proposed continuance. The applicant
indicated his concurrence. The Examiner subsequently closed the public hearing at 9:10 a.m.
to be continued to May 22, 1979 at 9:00 a.m.
CONTINUANCE:
The hearing was opened on May 22, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton
Municipal Building.
The Examiner advised receipt just prior to the hearing of a supplementary addendum to the
original Planning Department report regarding the subject request although he had not yet
reviewed it. He inquired if the applicant objected to continuance of the hearing for an
additional oae week period to allow appropriate review by the Examiner and the applicant
of the revised Planning Department recommendation. The applicant indicated his concurrence.
The Examiner subsequently closed the public hearing at 9:15 a.m. to be continued to May 29,
1979 at 9: 00 a.m.
CONTINUANCE:
The hearing was opened on May 29, 1979 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton
Municipal Building.
Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed
the Planning Department report and the subsequent addendum, and the reports were entered
into the record as Exhibits #1 and 2, respectively.
David Clemens, Senior Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional
exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #3: Site Plan with staff comments
Exhibit #4: Site Plan as revised
Exhibit #5: Overall Site Area Plan with staff comments
Exhibit #6: Building Elevations (2 sheets)
Mr. Clemens ,advised that the request had been reduced by the applicant to propose
development 3f a 35,000 square foot medical office facility and eliminate Phase II from
the request. Responding to a reference made by Mr. Clemens during review of Exhibit #1,
SA-325-79 Page Two
the Examiner inquired regarding existing restrictive covenants running with the subject
property. Mr. Clemens advised that covenants were required by the Planning Commission
during the rezone process, signed in July of 1975, and include requirements for
preservation of the existing ravine and creek, preservation of existing vegetation,
provision of landscape buffers along S. 37th Street and Talbot Road South, provision of
building setbacks along the north and east property lines, restriction of building height,
and limitation of access to Talbot Road South only.
Mr. Clemens advised that upon review of Exhibit #4, it was determined that the existing
stream meanders in an odd configuration and protrudes into the greenbelt setback area in
two locations. He recommended that the proposed boundary of construction in this area
constitute the limit of the proposed development area, but the two locations in which
the stream approaches development within the 100-foot limit contain transitional
landscaping.
Mr. Clemens reviewed provisions of the restrictive covenants and indicated that all
conditions have been met by the applicant including building height, limited access to
Talbot Road South, building setbacks, landscaping and preservation of the existing ravine
and creek. He noted that review of an exception by the Examiner will be required at a
later date to review the proposed access road of South 38th Street, proposed to be a public
street, and plans indicate a 28-foot curb to curb width, a 14-foot entry lane, 10-foot
median island and two 10-foot exit lanes adjacent to Talbot Road South, five-foot
sidewalks and a 45-foot curb radius at the westerly cul-de-sac bulb to meet requirements
of the Fire Department. Mr. Clemens indicated that if the application is approved,
specific plans for the roadway including methods to retain natural character of the area
woul be required. He also noted that provision of the cul-de-sac turnaround appears to
be a problem which will require review at the time the street design is known and will
invo ve revisions to the southeast corner of the site and possibly elimination of 8-10
parking spaces.
The Examiner inquired regarding proposed access to the parking area in view of severe
elevation differences between proposed building location and western portion of the property.
Mr. Clemens advised that traffic will enter on S. 38th Street and progress around the
building to one of three parking bay areas at the westerly end of the site. He indicated
that elevation differences within the 200-foot distance are approximately 10 feet or a
five percent slope in parking lot grade, and a series of steps and walkways would provide
access to the parking area at the extreme westerly end of the building.
The Examiner inquired if the department recommended provision of landscaping for the
existing residence on the site, currently being utilized for medical facilities, if
conversion to single family use occurs. Mr. Clemens advised that final plans for parking
and landscaping are being prepared by the owner, and he noted that previous approval of a
special permit to utilize the building was conditioned upon inclusion of those provisions.
The Examiner referenced Engineering Division comments attached to Exhibit #1 which refer
to alI petition by owners of Lots 1, 2 and 3 for vacation of the access road leaving access
to Lbt 4 in question, and requested clarification of the comment. Mr. Clemens indicated
that the request is for vacation of the public street right-of-way of S. 38th Street from
Talbot Road South.
The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibits #1 and 2. Responding was:
Charles Gliege
President, Gliege Corporation
Suite 403, 155 N.E. 100th Street
Seattle, WA 98125
Mr. Gliege indicated full concurrence in the report. He advised the existence of unique
and restrictive conditions surrounding the application requiring many meetings and input
from various staff members, and he expressed his appreciation to those staff representatives
involved in the negotiations.
The Examiner noted that because specific landscaping plans and other drawings have not been
submitted and because of the uncertainty of action regarding the proposed exception to the
ordinance for S. 38th Street, the site approval hearing may be premature. Mr. Gliege
advised that two to three times the normal amount of detailed plans had been prepared for
the ubject application, he felt that the process was at an advanced stage to prepare
cons ruction drawings for buildings and service of the site. He indicated that landscaping
drawings have been provided which will require only minor amendments since it designates
maximum landscaping for a 50,000 square foot building. He advised that survey of the
greenbelt area and existing stream had occurred very recently which completed the research
necessary for the project.
iiiiiti.#,.,.Yvr.tii ..s._4.-.F..iJ....M1-...-P.iw1n:a4iL'.::#3tv.:e,..:r.Aarl.d',.:.; .:.,_,a—*... R': :.-' .a • .. ..
r
SA-325-79 Page Three
Referring to the Examiner's concern regarding the proposed exception request for S. 38th
Street, Mr. Clemens advised that development can proceed regardless of whether the
exception is granted or not because actual provision of the street will be mandatory, and
only the final configuration will be determined by the Examiner. He also indicated that a
landscape plan had been submitted designating the general landscaping scheme and style on
the northern portion of the property, and although the Planning Department had not yet
reviewed it due to anticipated submission of revised drawings, the plan indicates the
applicant's good intention and conforms to the proposal set forth.
The Examiner inquired if the proposed 100-foot setback is a horizontal distance from the
centerline of the stream. Mr. Clemens indicated the Planning Department recommendation
to revise the recommended setback at the two points where the stream protrudes into the
setback to allow actual construction within the 100-foot distance but require provision
of heavier landscaping. The Examiner inquired if public access is planned to the greenbelt
or ravine area. Mr. Clemens noted that although no proposal currently exists, the
feasibility for access may exist at some future date through agreement between the
applicant and the city.
The Examiner inquired if the subject site covers the entire ravine containing a 100-foot
setback on both sides. Mr. Clemens indicated that the ravine exists on the entire site
with the exception of one portion. The Examiner inquired if plans exist for a Phase II
second building. Mr. Clemens advised that no plans exist and the intent of revision to
the restrictive covenants would disallow a future Phase II building. The Examiner inquired
if the covenants can be revised without input from those who are guaranteed rights under
the conditions of the covenant which may exist beyond the scope of the city. Mr. Gliege
advised that all conditions have been met and no problem will exist in compliance.
The Examiner requested testimony in support of the application. Responding was:
Larry R. Gibson
3713 Talbot Road South
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Gibson, owner of the property containing the existing residence easterly of the site,
indicated his opinion that the proposed development will be an outstanding addition to the
area. He advised his intention to provide maximum landscaping and coordinate both
developments to provide an attractive addition to the area.
The Examiner noted that Exhibit #1 reflects an estimated traffic generation figure of
4,000 vehicle trips per day. Mr. Clemens advised that the figure had been based on a
proposed facility containing 50,000 square feet which would be reduced to 2200 estimated
vehicle trips based upon the revised application. The Examiner indicated that the figure
was high for the single access road, S. 38th Street, and inquired if it would be more
appropriate to widen S. 37th Street or develop two accessways to the property. Mr. Clemens
advised that prior concern by the Planning Commission that access be restricted from S.
37th Street J.n order to protect single family residential areas had required that the
condition be incorporated into restrictive covenants at the time of the rezone approval.
He indicated that from an environmental standpoint, a two-lane public street with a three-
lane entry at Talbot Road S. could adequately accommodate an estimated 4,000 vehicle trips
per day and the roadway could ultimately accommodate up to 10,000 vehicle trips per day.
Mr. Gibson advised that one of the reasons he had purchased his property was due to the
restriction of access to S. 37th Street and the desire to provide a buffer between the
proposed use and the residential area. The Examiner stated that a traffic increase of
65% would be projected onto Talbot Road South which is not a major road. Mr. Clemens
noted that a: though the number of turning movements would be substantial, a certain amount
of traffic congestion at that point would be preferable to adversely affecting the single
family area. Mr. Gliege indicated that traffic counts had been calculated for maximum
development potential, but specific floor plans of offices reflect a total of approximately
30 medical offices and one pharmacy, and due to patient turnover ratio at 20 minute intervals,
the actual volume of traffic will be approximately one-third of the estimated figure or
800-900 trips per day.
The Examiner inquired if floor plans for the development are available for the record.
Mr. Gliege indicated that plans are available and they were entered into the record as
follows:
Exhibit #7: Proposed Landscaping Plans
Exhibit #8: Floor Plan of Proposed Medical Facility
The Examiner requested a final recommendation from the Planning Department representative.
Mr. Clemens advised that the recommendations contained in Exhibits #1 and 2 with
clarifications would remain as submitted.
The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No.
111SA-3__ 79 Page Four
SA-3 5-79 was closed by the Examiner at 10:10 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner
now makes and enters the following:
FINDNGS:
1. The request is for approval of a site plan for a medical clinic on ±5.5 acres in
4 P-1 zone.
2. The Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions,
findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached
as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
tie Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has
en issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official,
subject to conditions imposed by the Planning Department per Exhibit #2.
4. Flans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact
cf this development.
5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed.
6. '11 existing utilities are available and in close proximity.
7. T e proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height
r quirements of Section 4-710 of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General
0 dinances.
8. T e subject site consists of +5.5 acres much of which is covered with heavy vegetation.
T ere are many evergreen and deciduous trees on the property and a restrictive covenant
designates these significant trees and a large ravine on the property for preservation.
9. The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No. 1743, dated April 15, 1959.
AO amendment to the Comprehensive Plan in 1974 designated the site Public and Quasi-
Public. The site itself was rezoned to P-1 on July 11, 1975. On July 23, 1975,
certain restrictive covenants were executed by the property owner dealing with natural
features and site development. The subject parcel is the result of a short plat
Short Plat 113-77) approved by the Hearing Examiner on January 31, 1978.
10. The applicant proposes constructing a medical clinic on the subject site. There has
been considerable negotiation concerning the site development with the Planning Depart-
ment, prime beneficiary of the restrictive covenants. The proposal has been scaled
down considerably with a major emphasis on preserving the natural character of the site.
The original proposal called for construction of two separate buildings. As modified,
the applicant proposes to construct only one building of 34,600 square feet. There will
be no Phase 2 structure. Of the approximately 5.5 acres, about 2.6 acres will be used
for site development, which includes the building and parking areas and associated
landscaping.
T'le building is proposed to be about 40 feet in height, with an elevator tower extending
below grade to permit access to the parking area which is to be located about 10 feet
dlOwn slope of the structure's main level.
11. The main concern expressed by the applicant and the Planning Department, after
preservation of the natural features, is the protection of the single family residential
neighborhood located north of the subject site.
Various protective measures were outlined. The main effort would prevent access to the
clinic (other than for emergency vehicles) via S. 37th Street. Also adequate landscaping
and buffering would be required along this roadway. The landscaping would include a
berm no less than four feet in height and landscaped according to Planning Department
recommendations per Exhibit #2.
The height of the structure will also be limited so as not to impair the view or present
the single family area to the north with an imposing incompatible neighbor.
12. There is an existing single family residence just to the east. This residence, part of
the original parcel, is used as a private clinic subject to a special permit which
rlquires it to provide its own landscaping and buffering.
SA-3z -79 Page Five
13. The proposal appears to meet the requirements of the original restrictive covenants
included as Attachment A) and plans call for incorporating preservation of a larger
ravine area in the new covenants. Except for emergency access, users of the clinic
will enter and exit via S. 38th Street from Talbot Road S. Preservation of the ravine
and creek will, except for two areas, extend to 100 feet on either side of the center-
line of the creek. The two exceptions are where the creek makes two sharp meanders
and the Planning Department proposes heavier landscaping with natural-type vegetation
in these areas.
14. There ar,: no present plans to permit public access or use of the ravine area but the
Planning Department indicates such use may be possible.
15. The use of S. 38th Street for ingress and egress would require substantial improvement
of the right-of-way. A vacation of this right-of-way was denied. The Planning Depart-
ment recommendation for this access is development of a 28 foot curb-to-curb roadway
with a 45 foot radius cul-de-sac turnaround on the west end. The east end of the roadway
at Talbot Road would have provision for a 14 foot entry lane, ten foot landscaped median
island, and two ten foot exit lanes. The applicant would also be required to provide
five foot concrete sidewalks of meandering design and other easements for pedestrian
access. The proposed right-of-way would require an Exception subject to approval by
the Hearing Examiner.
16. The Planning Department estimates approximately 2,200 vehicle trips per day. The
applicant indicates 900 would be a more realistic estimate. To accommodate these
additional vehicle trips, the applicant has agreed to provide the necessary off-
site improvements along both Talbot Road S. and the proposed S. 38th Street access.
17. The Fire Department requires a second access which can be developed along S. 37th Street
at the Shattuck Ave. S. street end. This requirement, as well as the 45 foot turning
radius cil-de-sac, will decrease the amount of available parking which the site plans
now indicate. The applicant proposed parking for 174 automobiles while the code
requires parking for only 173.
The Utilities Department indicated that the area is a difficult one to service with
water. They will require prior approval of both water and sewer hookups and the
applicant will be subject to the standard regulations and fees.
18. Valley General Hospital is located about 1/8 mile south of the subject site. There
are a number of other clinics located south and southeast of the proposed clinic.
Across Talbot Road S. to the east, and to the north across S. 37th Street are single
family residences.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposed clinic appreas to be compatible with the Comprehensive Plan designation
of this area as Public and Quasi-Public. The various plans discussed in the above
Findings which are aimed at protecting the natural features and environmental ameni-
ties of the ravine and creek are compatible with both the Comprehensive Plan and the
covenants restricting use of this site.
2. The topographic constraints of the site are unusual and the proposed plans, subject
to continuing review by the Planning Department and other affected departments, appear
to effectively take this into account. The 100 foot setback from the ravine, which the
applicant accepts, will only be breached in two areas and these will be heavily land-
scaped.
The applicant is proposing a less intense development which will lessen the impact
upon both the natural features of the site and the nearby residential areas. The
applicant is also proposing protective landscaping for both the ravine area of the
subject site and the residential area north of S. 37th Street.
3. The applicant and the Planning Department will still have to address the issue of
decreased parking caused by both the required fire access and the proposed cul-de-sac.
The space required for such additional parking may be provided by any means which does
not jeopardize the 100 foot buffer along the ravine or the berm required along the
north property line.
4. The Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan at Page G7 indicates a potential need for
walking and hiking opportunities in this area. The ravine and creek area would seem
to meet some of these requirements and the Planning Department indicated that future
access to the natural area of the subject site was a possibility. Therefore, the
applicart should, in addition to the covenants preserving this natural area, grant a
rar13t4.attx°=xr.;LL ut"x:AF<_skn 3.s ri.:a.-:.4e"s14rM _
c
SA-325-79 Page Six 11
public easement within the ravine area for the development of a walking and hiking
trail. The width should not be such as to create a major disturbance to the natural
features of the ravine and, therefore, the easement should be five feet wide, subject
to appropriate surface and grades, running the length of the subject property's portion
of the ravine. The location and design of the easement shall be subject to approval
of the Planning Department.
5. The Planning Department, per Exhibit #2, Recommendation 2, indicates the appropriate
type of berm and landscaping which the applicant must provide to protect the residential
area to the north. There was no opposition to this recommendation and, therefore,
since such screening and buffering is necessary to protect the privacy and quietude
of the area, it shall be required.
6. The landscaping plans submitted were tentative but indicate the general approach the
applicant proposes and, therefore, with final plans subject to review and approval of
the Planning Department, the landscaping will be sufficient.
7. IBecause of the expected impact of this proposal on both the proposed access via S. 38th
Street and Talbot Road S. , off-site improvements by the applicant are imperative. The
forecast by the Planning Department may be somewhat high as was argued by the applicant,Ibut even using the applicant's estimate, the increase would still be in the neighbor-
hood of 20%. The off-site improvements were also a condition of approval of the short
plat which resulted in the formation of the subject parcel and no change has occurred
to cause modification of that decision.
8. There has been no application for an exception and until such time the development
of S. 38th Street shall be per ordinance requirements, and the requirements of the
short plat approval.
DECI ION:
Approval of the subject proposal subject to the following conditions:
1. Preservation of the existing stream and ravine area by the execution of restrictive
covenants which shall stipulate that no construction, alteration, clearing, or stream
relocation shall occur within 100 feet of the centerline of the existing stream,
subject to the possible construction of a walking and hiking trail within the ravine
area.
2. The conveyance of a five foot easement for the public as a hiking trail, subject to
appropriate access, surfacing and grades, through the ravine on the subject parcel.
The location, design, and installation of the easement shall be subject to approval
pf the Planning and Public Works Departments.
3. The execution of a covenant restricting the use of this parcel to the plans and
esigns approved by this decision, subject to minor modifications, but in no way
ermitting further expansion of the clinic facility beyond that approved herein.
4. creen landscaping shall be provided along the north property line which landscaping
hall consist of a minimum 20 foot wide landscaped area, with a minimum four foot high
erm planted with evergreen trees a minimum of ten to twelve feet in height, at not
8 reater than twelve foot center to center spacing, and interspersed with an evergreen
hedge of a minimum five gallon (24 to 36 inch height) at five foot center to center
spacing, and ground cover.
5. Transitional plantings shall be located between the proposed parking area and the
stream/ravine area subject to the approval of the Planning Department.
6. Public access shall be via a right-of-way improved to code standards along S. 38th
treet unless an Exception is approved by the Hearing Examiner. Only emergency access
hall be permitted via S. 37th Street.
7. All public street improvements required for this proposal and the previously approved
Short plat shall be installed prior to occupancy of this building. These improvements
shall include but are not necessarily limited to:
al. Off-site improvements on Talbot Road S.
b. Off-site improvements on S. 38th Street.
c. Water, storm drainage, street lighting, traffic signing and sanitary sewers.
r
SA-325-79 Page Seven
8. Final Public Works Department approval of all plans for all public facilities per
code requirements.
9. Fire Department approval of the emergency access via S. 37th Street which shall be
designed and landscaped subject to Planning Department approval.
10. Final approval by the Planning Department of detailed landscaping, buffering and
screening of the property and structure, including the installation of new parking
stalls as the need may arise.
11. Installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drainage, and street paving along
S. 37th Street.
12. Storm water retention/detention per code requirements.
ORDERED THIS llth day of June, 1979.
Fred J. Ka an V4-4.- -
Land Use He ing Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS llth day of June, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties
of record:
Charles Gleige, Suite 403, 155 N.F. 100th St. , Seattle, WA 98125
Larry R. Gibson, 3713 Talbot Rd. S. , Renton, WA 98055
A. Daniel Dansereau, 11120 N.E. 2nd St. , Bellevue, WA 98004
TRANSMI` TED THIS llth day of June, 1979 to the following:
Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Joan Walker, Planning Commission Chairperson
Ron Nelson, Building Division
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before June 25, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error
in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available
at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen
14) days from the date of the Examiner' s decision. This request shall set forth the
specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the
record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires
that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and
meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for
inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased
at cost in said department.
ft
ci4
ACE APAT ION OF RE SIR I(:.l I VI ('(i'/i VAN] S
I'iII:I I l i I I i ,lln `) lewd r i Pope .lots I l l ei Wit i ' e Pope ,
his to i l e , aro I he owner., of the t o l l o0 I ng rt ,1 I property i t
th(' City of Renton , (;uunt.y of King , , L.It.e () t !•JaShintlton ,
described JS Ioi loiS :
Ih,it portion of the southea; t. quarter of SeeI for 3(1 ,
l ('t'inshifr ?.1 North , ramie 5 fast , W . f•l. , in hin(l County
Washington : Beginning at the South quarier corner
nl said ',ec. Linn 30 ; thence north along the (forth
and South center I I Ile of said S I't t. I (III il) , ,1 d i c f,l tl I I,
of ?S0 toot ; thence north 89°06 ' O3" east 05(1 feet
to the true point of beginning ; thence north parallel
to the north and south center line of said section 30
a distance of 421 . 49 feet to the westerly production
of the southerly line of a tract. of land sold on
tontracl. to Joseph Mame and Betty Mance , ills wife ,
recorded under Auditor ' s file No . 4687718 ; t hence
south 84° 17' 00" east along the southerly boundary
of said Manct' tract. and along the southerly boundary
o f a tract of land conveyed to Joseph Fiance and hetty
Nance , his wife , by deed recorded under Auditor ' s
I i Ie No. 46439?6 , '113 . 77 feet. , more or less , to the
wes ter l y line of the S1 r i nghcook or Litho! County
Road (06t.h ) Avenue Southeast ) ; thence south O0111) 1 ?0"
1.1,'st along the westerly line of said read 521) teed, ,
mire or ii'ss , to the north line of a tract of land ,
1 onvoyed to Ivan G . Ihlhedacht and Phy 11 I .. (Inhedac ht ,
hip wife , by deed recorded under Auditor ' s file No,
10tth: 49; thence along the northerly line. of said
iiehc'dachI tract. north 74o:39 ' 53" west 674 . 52 feet ,
i1:1)11' or less , to .an angle point in said northE i ly line ;
thence ronI, inuing along said northerly line south
9°06 '.O3" west 105 feet to the true point of
betiinning .
WItLt;LAS, the owner; of said described property
desire to impose the following rest.I' icl. ive covenants •
running with the land .1 `, to use , $1resent and future , of
the above described real property
MOHI, THEREFORL, the ator•esaid owners hereby
t", lal) I I '.11 , grdlit and impose rt", tI' it troll', a11(I ( (IVe1111t '.
running Id11Ii the land hervinabove doserII'nJ with i'
to the use by the undersigned , their tilt i (' ,i,
and (15', it;i)s , as follows :
MA I til AI CII I 1';
I he er i ', i i Igo r,rb i i,r and , i 1'ei, .i(.( i i i t
in it ', udinral ', I .IIe , .)1(1 nil II'ut t ,, , ',o,t ! I
n', 1. t'llt 1L.I tvithinn the ravine dreg I,tllr t itt i'-
Ilcicl' Vi J by the Penton i' I n,I I't'I1 , I i ' •' 1' 1
I. AUIM eAPI ,1t'I A',
O ) Ilelaileo lanlstape !, Ian'„ tot hiding 0.\ ISIintf
vc''relat ion to remain , shaft be ,,tibi, i I Ie11 to
RECEIVED and approved by the kenl.or) I'l ,)iil( ing Ueportiden .
CITY OF RENTJN prior to t ul' het' tilevt' Iiiirl.n'lit on the
HEARING EXAMINER
MAY291979
AM PM
7rt31911011111211 )2131115,6
7 11
h ) Minimum fifteen ( IS ) toot landscape tutfers ,hall
he added along South 37th Street and the existing
f i f teen ( 1S ) fool huller .long IaIboI Road South
ha I l be maintained I O adequa t 1' I V screen (IIi(I reduce
impacts to adjacent. residentialial u',es prior to fur-
ther development on I.he site .
c ) Existing vegetation shall be maintained as much
as possible . Existing vegetation shall be removed
only by approval of the Renton Planning Department
p prior to any further development or clearing on
the site .
SETBACKS
A minimum forty (40 ) foot setback shall he maintained
for all structures along the north and east property
lines .
HEIGHT LIMIT
All buildings or structures located within one hun -
dred ( IOO ) feet of the north and east property lines
shall maintain a maximum height limit of two ( 2 )
stories or twenty- five ( 25 ) feet , whichever is less . '
ACCESS
Access shall he limited to tolbot Road South . ( If
access i % allowed to Smith 31th Street , there twenty
20 ) feet of additional right -of -way shall he dedi -
cated .
DEVELOPMENT f'I ANS
All site developlient plans , including those of public
or quasi -public institutions , ,hall he approved by the
Renton Planning Commi ', 5, ion .
l)OI;AT I uN
these (.uverlants sha I I run with the land and
December 31 , 2020 .
Any violation or breach of Ih;",r I
I ovonaII I,S III(V be 011I t)rl t tI Ily t'r U ,' I I I 1'rl'( I'II'I rt. ' Ili t I f.
Superior Court of King t „unI ' either ne ity of t Ir r
or any property Owners ,Ill tllill Ing it, Il't I I'I ' I .'FIv v,I',u ate
adversely at Iectecl by said l,re,ll h .
Wi 11 iarnm Stewart Pope Ellen Phi to Pope
SIAll. Of WASHINCION )
COIINIV 01 KINK
On this day ut 19 betide n.e per -
sonally appeared and
the f)er!,ulls who exet ut.0'(1 the wi t.h i ri and
foregoing instrument .
tiElFCys.r&c:r =eRa-uv a,eYa...ak:5".' 't:;a7,t:Q].j1`.`i.datf5'k'l;s,•-...: *.N ea4'..:.nc?'a a,:§t54is_r+iti=..iiii3taW3'ru::Y9d.'':- '56Y.;ep::.?_.P'V f. .. _k4-1 1^?,_..:.,..
and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary
act. and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed my official seal the day and year first above written .
Cr)kcV h1 iv\,
tiGc
Notary Public in and- fpr' xhe•State
of Washington , re s td
0
ti)
4417 NJ s'
Xy..;
i:w:.:.- - .e.....a. di::swac.i-.i:yn e; .ai -± - •mot+..s .42.-,-•e: . .z m"v..`.{Y, lam_....+`....,yiridette,..i^ ' -:1• • . ..
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAY 2 91979
SUPPLEMENT TO PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EIMMINER PM
MAY 22 , 1979 7,819110111112111213141516
a
APPLICANT : GLIEGE CORPORATION
FILE NO : SA-325-79 AHIBIT NO.
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST :`
vEM NO. fir- a - 7`7
The applicant requests site approval for development of a 50 ,000
square foot medical office facility in a P- 1 zone , in two phases .
Phase 1 will consist of a three-story building of 34 ,600 square
feet to be constructed immediately . The Phase 2 will follow at a
later date.
B . GENERAL INFORMATION :
1 . Owner of Record : A. DANIEL DANSEREAU FOR
VALLIS JOINT VENTURE
2 . Applicant : GLIEGE CORPORATION
3. Location : Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South .
Vicinity map attached)
4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available
on file in the Renton Planning Department .
5 . Size of Property : t5 . 5 acres .
C . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS :
1 . The Planning Department staff has met with the applicant and
his representatives and have concluded that subject to certain
conditions that the proposed declaration of significant impact
dated April 18 , 1979 , may be modified to a final declaration
of non-significance . The conditions of the declaration of
non-significance are listed on the revised declaration .
2 . The previous analysis , items one through five , continue to
apply .
3 . The Planning staff in its review with other City departments
has concluded that first the stream and ravine area must be
preserved in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and cove-
nants of the original rezone approval . Secondly , access to
the subject site must be a public street in order to meet
minimum safety standards and provide for adequate access of
emergency vehicles to the site.
4 . The following recommended conditions of approval have been
reviewed with the applicant , and he has 'indicated general
concurrence with all conditions .
D. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION :
Based upon the previous analysis , and the foregoing items , recom-
mend approval of this site approval application subject to :
1 . Preservation of the existing stream and ravine area shall be
insured by the provision of restrictive covenants which shall
stipulate that no construction , alteration , vegetation
removal or stream relocation shall occur within 100 feet of
the centerline of the existing stream. ( Existing covenants
to be amended accordingly. )
2 . Screen landscaping shall be provided along the north property
line which shall consist of a minimum 20 foot wide landscaped
area , with a minimum 4 foot height berm planted with evergreen
trees a minimum of 10 to 12 feet in height, at not greater
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUPPLEMENT TO PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
MAY 22 , 1979
PAGE TWO
than 12 foot center to center spacing , and interspersed with
an evergreen hedge of a minimum 5 gallon ( 24 to 36 inch
height) at 5 foot center to center spacing , and ground cover.
3 . Where required , transitional plantings shall be located between
the proposed parking area and the stream/ravine area which
shall emphasize native plant materials .
4 . Public street access shall be provided as follows :
a . Subject to Hearing Examiner review and approval of
specific detailed plans for the access public street
to consist of:
1 ) 28 foot curb to curb width with no parking.
2) Adjacent to Talbot Road South , improvements shall
consist of a 14 foot entry lane , 10 foot median
island , and two 10 foot exit lanes .
3) 5 foot concrete sidewalks of a meandering design
shall be utilized . Where required , pedestrian
easements shall be granted for sidewalk locations
outside of the existing right-of-way.
4) A 45 foot curb radius shall be utilized at the
westerly cul -de-sac bulb in accordance with Fire
Department requirements .
5 . All public street improvements required for this development
and the short plat providing for creation of this lot shall
be installed prior to occupancy of this building , including
but not necessarily limited to :
a . Off-site improvements on Talbot Road South .
b. Off-site improvements on the access public street.
c . Water , storm drainage, street lighting , traffic signing
and sanitary sewers .
6 . Final Public Works Department approval of all plans for all
public facilities and improvements in accordance with City
codes and ordinances , or as varied by the Hearing Examiner
per #4 above.
7 . Fire Department approval of details of access from South
37th Street to consist of 20 foot minimum width such as
grasscrete" or similar paving surface compatible with the
basic landscaped treatment of the berm separation adjacent
to South 37th ( per #2 above) .
8. Final Planning Department approval of detailed landscaping
plans , screening of rooftop equipment , and any revisions to
the site plan should such revision be required by any of the
foregoing conditions of approval .
9 . Installation of curbs , gutters , sidewalk, storm drainage
and street paving on South 37th Street in accordance with
ordinance provisions .
10. Storm water retention/detention in accordance with appropriate
City codes and ordinances .
I
PROPOSED/FINAL I LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/ 4-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No .SA-325-79 - PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No . ECF-447-79 FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Site approval for development of a SO,nnn sq- ft- medical
office building facility in a P-1 zone in two phases. Phase 1 to consist of a 3-story
building of 34,600 sq. ft. to be constructed immediately; Phase 2 at a later date.
Proponent GLIEGE CORPORATION
Location of Proposal Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South.
Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS is
x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was
ma-de after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
Reasons for declaration of/ environmental significance :
subject to the five conditions listed on the attachment.
Measure! , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/ final )
declaration of non-significance :
Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen
Title Pl .j g`q/ect• Date May 22, 1979
Si gnats re i`/
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
II
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUPPLEMENT TO PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
MAY 22 , "'EXHIBIT NO. 2
ITEM NO. 5
APPLICANT : GL I EGE CORPORATION
RECEIVED
FILE NO: SA-325-79 CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
MAY 2 91979
AM PM
718,9110111112111213141516
D. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION :
Based upon the previous analysis , and the foregoing items , recom-
mend approval of this site approval application subject to :
1 . Preservation of the existing stream and ravine area shall be
insured by the provision of restrictive covenants which shall
stipulate that no construction , alteration , vegetation
removal or stream relocation shall occur within 100 feet of
the centerline of the existing stream. ( Existing covenants
to be amended accordingly. )
2 . Screen landscaping shall be provided along the north property
line which shall consist of a minimum 20 foot wide landscaped
area , with a minimum 4 foot height berm planted with evergreen
trees a minimum of 10 to 12 feet in height , at not greater
than 12 foot center to center spacing , and interspersed with
an evergreen hedge of a minimum 5 gallon ( 24 to 36 inch
height) at 5 foot center to center spacing , and ground cover.
3. Where required , transitional plantings shall be located between
the proposed parking area and the stream/ravine area which
shall emphasize native plant materials .
4 . Public street access shall be provided as follows :
a . Subject to Hearing Examiner review and approval of
specific detailed plans for the access public street
to consist of:
1 ) 28 foot curb to curb width with no parking.
2) Adjacent to Talbot Road South, improvements shall
consist of a 14 foot entry lane , 10 foot median
island , and two 10 foot exit lanes .
3) 5 foot concrete sidewalks of a meandering design
shall be utilized. Where required , pedestrian
easements shall be granted for sidewalk locations
outside of the existing right—of-way.
4) A 45 foot curb radius shall be utilized at the
westerly cul -de-sac bulb in accordance with Fire
Department requirements .
5 . All public street improvements required for this development
and the short plat providing for creation of this lot shall
be installed prior to occupancy of this building , including
but not necessarily limited to :
a . Off-site improvements on Talbot Road South.
b. Off-site improvements on the access public street .
c. Water , storm drainage, street lighting, traffic signing
and sanitary sewers .
I RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
MAY 2 91979
AM PM
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7,8,91101111121112131415,E
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER e
PUBLIC HEARING
APRIL 24 , 1979
APPLICANT : GLIEGE CORPORATION EXHIBIT NO, /
FILE NO : SA-325-79
ITEM NO. 'fi -3z5 -71
A . SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST :
The applicant requests site approval for development of a
50 , 000 square foot medical office facility in a P-1 zone ,
in two phases . Phase 1 will consist of a 3-story building of
34 ,600 square feet to be constructed immediately . The Phase 2
will follow at a later date . (Site development map attached . )
B . GENERAL INFORMATION :
1 . Owner of Record : A . DANIEL DANSEREAU FOR
VALLIS JOINT VENTURE
2 . Applicant : GLIEGE CORPORATION
3. Location :Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road
Vicinity map attached ) South
4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is
available on file in the Renton
Planning Department .
5 . Size of Property : 5 . 5 acres
6 . Access : Via S . 37th Street
7 . Existing Zoning : P-1 , Public Use
8. Existing Zoning in the Area : P- 1 , Public Use District , SR-1 ,
Single Family Residence ; G-9600 ,
General Classification District
9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Public and Quasi Public
10 . Notification :The applicant was notified in
writing of the hearing date .
Notice was properly publised in the
Record Chronicle on April 13 , 1979
and posted on three places on or
near the site as required by City
Ordinance on April 11 , 1979 .
C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND :
The subject site was annexed into the City on April 15 , 1959 ,
by Ordinance No . 1743 . The Comprehensive Plan in the area was
studied and amended on October 22 , 1974 . The subject site was
rezoned to P- 1 on July 11 , 1975 , by Ordinance No . 2944 . Certain
restrictive covenants dealing with retention of the natural character
of the site and ravine area , together with certain developmental
requirements , were filed on July 23 , 1975 , and run with the land .
The subject parcel was part of Short Plat 113-77 approved by the
Hearing Examiner on January 31 , 1978 .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : GLIEGE CORPORATION , FILE NO : SA-325-79
APRIL 24, 1979
PAGE TWO
D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND :
1 . Topography : The site slopes downward to the west at approxi -
mately a 10% grade .
2 . Soils : A majority of the site consists of Indianola Loamy
Fine Sane ( InC ) . This soil has rapid permeability ; available
water capacity is moderate ; runoff is slow to medium; and erosion
hazard is slight to moderate . This soil is used for timber and
for urban development . The ravine area consists of Alderwood
Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC ) . Runoff is medium , and erosion hazard
is severe . The slippage potential is moderate . This Alderwood
Soil is used mostly for timber. This soil does not appear
to be appropriate for urban-type development.
3 . Vegetation : The site is heavily wooded with an abundant
cover of evergreen and deciduous trees . Groundcover consists
principally of brambles . Restrictive covenants designate
the existing significant trees and the ravine area for
preservation and incorporation into the development of the
site . The ravine area is to be preserved in its natural woodland-
type state or enhanced with suitable native-type vegetation .
4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide suitable
habitat for birds and small mammals .
5 . Water : A small stream runs along the southerly boundary of the
subject property .
6. Land Use : There is an existing single family residence located
to the east of the subject site . There are existing clinics
located south and southeast of the subject site . Valley General
Hospital is located approximately 1 /8 mile south of
the subject site . There are existing single family residences
located directly north of the subject site on the north side of
South 37th Street and east of the subject site on the east side
of Talbot Road South .
E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :
The area is characterized by a mixture of single family residences
and public/quasi -public uses in the form of the hospital and supportiv
medical clinics .
F . PUBLIC SERVICES :
1 . Water and Sewer : There is an existing 20 inch water main
located along Talbot Road South and an existing Metro Sewer
gravity line located along South 37th Street and Talbot Road
South . Storm sewers are not available in the area . There are
drainage ditches , however , and any development on the site
will be subject to suitable storm water retention and oil /water
separation facilities prior to out-flow from the site .
2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per
ordinance requirements .
3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #145 operates along S . W . 43rd
Street approximately 1 /4 mile south of the subject site .
4 . Schools : The subject site is not in close proximity to any
existing schools , and the proposed project will not have an
effect on existing school population except possible indirectly
through increased employment opportunities in the area .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : GLIEGE CORPORATION , FILE NO : SA-325-79
APRIL 24, 1979
PAGE THREE
5. Recreation : The subject site is approximately one mile south
of Tablot Hill Park .
H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE :
1 . Section 4-710, P-1 , Public District
2 . Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading
I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT :
1 . Natural Systems : Development of the site will disturb soil
and vegetation , increase storm water runoff , and has an effect
on noise levels in the area . However, these can be mitigated
by proper development controls and procedures and adherence
to the existing restrictive covenants and sound planning principals
and practices .
2 . Population/Employment : The nature of the use is such that
there isn ' t likely to be any significant effect on population .
3. Schools : Not Applicable .
4 . Social : Changing the use from low density , single family
residential to quasi -public , medical clinic , may result in
additional social interaction at the site as well as in the
surrounding area .
5. Traffic : The proposed medical office facility will generate
approximately 3765 additional vehicle trips per day (75 trips
per 1000 square feet) between the S . 37th Street and Talbot Road
South . This is a 65% traffic increase over the existing 5775
daily traffic trips on Talbot Road South in this vicinity .
J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION :
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the
State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended RCW 43-21C ,
the Planning Director has prepared a proposed declaration of environ-
mental significance . Issues of traffic access , impact on the
adjoining single family homes , encroachment into the ravine area ,
and site development master plan remain to be resolved . An EIS
may be required to address these issues unless an amended application
is submitted .
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED :
1 . City of Renton Building Division .
2 . City of Renton Engineering Division .
3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division .
4 . City of Renton Utilities Division .
5 . City of Renton Fire Department.
L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS :
1 . The applicant ' s two-phased development proposal is generally
consistent with the P- 1 zoning for the subject site. However,
the restrictive covenants ( copies attached) define more specific
development criteria due to the unique features of the site
including proximate to single family homes and natural stream/
ravine which crosses the site . The covenants were established
at the time of the rezoning of the site to insure compliance
with the Comprehensive Plan which clearly designates a portion
of the site for preservation of the stream area for permanent
greenbelt . The proposed development substantially conflicts
with these covenants .
A review of the records of previous actions on the subject site
indicates that commitments were made by the property owner to
provide for development of the site to a P. U. D. master plan
approach to insure compatibility of the development to the site.
The sr tted application does not provide for this approach .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : GLIEGE CORPORATION , FILE NO : SA-325-79
APRIL 24, 1979
PAGE FOUR
2 . In reviewing this proposal , a substantial number of unresolved
questions have been raised related to the environmental impact
of this development . These include :
1 ) Public access and improvements :
a . To Talbot Road
b . On-site
c . Street improvements
d . Total traffic generated
e . Proposed street vacation
2 ) Impacts upon the existing ravine and adjoining single
family uses
3 ) Site development intensity , structure types and sizes .
Without substantial modification to the proposal ,
an EIS will be required . The staff and applicant are
attempting to resolve these issues , however , a continuance
is required .
3 . The Engineering Division advises that storm water retention
and detention will be required and that curb , gutter , sidewalk ,
storm drainage and paving will be required on S . 37th Street .
This division also notes that lots 1 , 2 , and 3 have petitioned
for the vacation of the access road . This leaves the access to
lot 4 in question .
4 . The Fire Department indicates that the project must meet fire
flow requirements . Also , fire protection appliance type and
number shall be installed as per the requirements of the Fire
Chief along with ingress and egress and fire hydrant number .
Watermains and hydrants are to be installed prior and previous
to any building construction . Also , uniform fire code requirements
for occupancy type and use must be met .
5 . Utilities Engineering notes that the subject site is
in a location that is complex for water service . Approval ,
therefore , would be subject to approved water and sewer plans
and payment of standard hook-up fees for water and sewer .
Additional comments of other departments are attached for
consideration .
M . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION :
Based upon the above analysis , and need for an EIS or amended
application , and due to the remaining environmental issues , this
public hearing must be continued indefinitely to be readvertised
at such time as the issues are addressed in an EIS or modified in
the application .
L,
7,.'''.."?''''P..
t ,t'
9 t
I\ k— - , i
o
c
IL_E I --'111,___ __.- :.
1+/•. f
I
rs
1 1"--f" d_ . . ,
y
p 11_ , ilt ,
1 v
fit 1
t
1
G -9600
n,
i ... 1. ;71 k ,.
ff
L
U83EcT o
y]
ITC
ze' I S ,w3132 as
1-;)
WEl QJ
p..1
l
1.
rti,. .,;,;,4,
4
I
x 4
e is ze / lL—I
as
I G•97 "
i _......
2 ZONING COR
wi
I R- 2 i
I
GLIEGE CORPORATION
SA-324-79
i
APPLICANT GLIEGE CORPORATION
TOTAL AREA ±5.5 acres
PR INC I PAL ACCESS Via S, 37th Street
F X I S1 I NG ZONING P-1, Public Use
EXISTING USE Undeveloped
PROPOSED USE Medical Office facility in P-1 Zone
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Public and Quasi Public
COMMENTS
1
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO : O Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
OPark Department
O,'Police Department
OPublic Works Department
O 8oilding Div .
Lg¢Engineering Div. (Please verify legal description )
8 Traffic Engineering Div .
Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or
his esignee )
dt #'xi6 DATE :G9
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT :41,07de,
LOCATION :5f e ,T
APPLICATION( S ) :
6:4 - may- 749
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING ( M_ t
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : f i
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : 1%,/+( , ,,, t,-,.,
En Approved ED Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
V
L, 1;Zo-i--4 t-, ,2:- e.,_-/.._ _./a/c - L1 .
3) s // C ,,. r 1
j q w hie i
S.-4- 7A-
i S-4.c w . Cron K«.i .
79/ -, .41.k7 c-
2 ___ _ (/) ,„ . v4, /7,
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : A.',/ i=/=1c L ovG iN EeN G
Approved C] Not Approved
Co ents or conditions :
2 2--yA2/2
c.. 63, c
Date
cl .....*uv.n of nirprtnr or Authorized Represent ive
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : /j "-
Q Approved Not Approved //zs i ,4.= j/krec- /=-40'4_,
Comments or conditions : / j,,-741,„4-3 .x4;C- in7.2io/Li
fj'/'l/4A/Cg- " A rrK3G 5i'/ £ .T.17-necc O /?J fu,C //flc C/f'cc--.s'
ree4r i// ", 3. ac/PGSS '471.40 £ ,eI-SS .c.r'J t-bee //>' /tx..7 /`u/--raee /7S
e L;4c Cf//4£17S vt-Yc'e" -`,''t —7 Gr./9 ir2 /'1,9i5 /hvi0 /'i 1 ' -/rl''7',1' Tv
At /.t.577?t€G 7 /14."/ r5 /P -4,/_) Fj"L-viur- J 7 .4,-7'C.' C_Q'.t .C7/Z eirsA
fa S/ Alf -e a/--C ,eciGNU/'Z-,c-i4s."7,.I 1,./e ce_-cc-//..--i1 t.G'/, -2 v-z- G/7.0 L'Jc
Signature o 0 rector or Author ' ed Representative ate
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :U TiL171 i" '
Approved Q Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
ort: ;N,s ,Oat Is ,a cod".PcEx
pac-A- FA_ ,,,/,yr62- S%b/tc4)
SK0s"c LT ro ,e.- A"le Liz+, SCw(A ALarJ
i,;)Cc( ro I / Fri- Li/Aral ci- I V- /Fr i' c ti SY5,7Lr-"'- pN Cr/e26c# .
4/72/71
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :e. < >/_
Approved C] Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
I
Sgnature-u__:.,--,,,---- --,-,
a.-7,-,
f Di` rector or Authorized Representative Date
1
ROUTING FC.. .tEVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL C'_._ _ KLIST FORMS
TO : O Finance Department
IIIFire
Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
OPublic Works Department
8 Building Div .
Engineering Div.
Traffic Engineering Div .
Q Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designee )
0 /A
dilian , ezolopi.,
SUBJECT : Review of ECF-
J! 4 ; Application No . :
Action Name : 4/./ 1"
rl e 7ff
Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : al /* A,
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :e dF1=z_E Nc6J N I- E iv_ I (' C
SIGNIFICANT KNON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
Y/2/77
Signature of Dir ector or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :-- cc.2 -4.
SIGNIFICANT u ,K NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized-T ep esentati a ate
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : AM.,' -/
SIGNIFICANT 41 NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
Lon(1i:N.wiUN7n-L__ Co.40,0v7 Oily
0( 'l .} - 1 .,
Ar 1 41-/ 7 y
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da e
r
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO : O Finance Department
Fire Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
OPublic Works Department
8 Building Div .
Engineering Div .
OTraffic Engineering Div .
C / CYUtilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designee ) oMan /e et0la fi fe 7
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 4! 1 7 ; Application No . : l 7
Action Name : 4zioe...-- _ v
a/ ,th/zlf
Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : N
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : 27/ c-
SIGNIFICANT IaliON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
2
7/3C-J/7 C/
Signature f Director or Author zed Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : 'O. 0
SIGNIFICANT PION SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
7
Z_[_ ' /' (- r_— _:--'-yam--
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
1
PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANL_. NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No . SA-325-79 p PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No . ECF-447-79 FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Site approval for development of a 50,000 sq. ft. medical
office bldg. facility in a P-1 zone in two phases. Phase 1 to consist of a 3-story
building of 34,600 sq. ft. to be constructed immediately; Phase 2 at a later date.
Proponent GLIEGE CORPORATION
Location of Proposal Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South
Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal has been determined to ® have not hav a
il
si nificant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS Ui is
is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was
ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : A substantial number of
unresolved questions have been raised related to the environmental impact of this
development. These include: (1) Public access and improvements: a. to Talbot Road,
b. Un-site, c. Street improvements, d. total trattic generated, e. proposed street
vacation; (2) Impacts upon the existing ravine and adjoining single family uses;
3) site development intensity, structure types and sizes. Without subtantial modificatic
to the proposal , and EIS will be required.
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final )
declaration of non-significance :
Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN
Title PLANNI ';API ' OR Date April 18. 1979
Signature /
f City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
vvi 44 -x4g ar-e:
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE CO'JLNANTS
WHEREAS, Wi 1 l iam Stewart. Pope and E I ler; White Pope ,
his wife , are the owners of the following real property in
the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington ,
described as follows :
That portion of the southeast quarter of Section 30 ,
Ct' township 23 North , range 5 Last , W . M. , in King County
Washington : Beginning at the south quarter corner
of said section 30 ; thence north along the north
C) and south center line crf said section 30 , a distance
I-
of 250 feet ; thence north 89°06 ' 03" east 950 feet
to the true point of beginning ; thence north parallel
to the north and south centerline of said section 30
a distance of 421 . 49 feet to the westerly production
of the southerly line of a tract of land sold on
contract to Joseph Mance and Betty Mance , his wife ,
recorded under Auditor ' s file No . 4687718 ; thence
South 84° 17 ' 00" east along the southerly boundary
of said Mance Tract and along the southerly boundary
of a tract of land conveyed to Joseph Mance and Betty
Mance , his wife , by deed recorded under Auditor ' s
file No . 4643926 , 213 . 77 feet , more or less , to the
westerly line of the Springbrook or Talbot County
Road (96th ) Avenue Southeast ) ; thence south '6°00 ' 20"
west along the westerly line of said road 520 feet ,
More or less , to the north line of a tract of land , '
conveyed to Ivan G. tlnhedacht and Phyllis Unbedac.ht. ,
his wife , by deed recorded under Auditor ' s file No.,
4696849; thence along the northerly line of said '
IInhedacht. Tract north 74°39 ' 53" west 674 . 52 feet ,
more or less , to an angle point. in said northerly line ;
thence continuing along said northerly line south
R9°06 ' 03" west 105 feet to the true point of
beginning .
WHEREAS, the owners of said described property
desire to impose the following restrictive covenants
running with the land as to use , present and future , of
the above described real property
MOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby
est.anl isn , grant and impose restrictions and covenants
running with the land herei nabove described with re , per t.
to the use by the undersigned , their sucue',sor', , hei rs ,
dnd assigns , as follows :
NA1t1I.'AL AI,'LAS
I he existing ravine and 1. ree'I. ,hat l I hy prest'rvy(I
in it.s natural sI.al.e , and no slructnres shall be
ailst.rllc. te(I within the ravine area unless other-
wise approved by the PourIon Planning Popartoent. .
LANDSCAPE ATLAS
1 ) Detailed lands(dpe plans , including existing
vegetation to remain , sha i I be submitted to
RECEIVED and approved by the Renton Planning Departrlent
CITY OF RENION prior to further doveloohlerlt on the site .
HEARING EXAMIN_R
MAY 2 91979
AM PM
718,9110,11,E21112131 4,5,6
4
l
b ) Minimum fifteen ( 15 ) foot landscape buffers shall
be added along South 37th Street and the existing
fifteen ( 15 ) fool buffer along Talbot Road South
shall be maintained • to adequately screen and reduce
impacts to adjacent residential uses prior to fur-
ther development on the site .
c ) Existing vegetation shall be maintained as much
as possible . Existing vegetation shall be removed
only by approval of the Renton Planning Department
0 prior to any further development or clearing on
C71 the site .
LA r
SETBACKS
A minimum forty (40 ) foot setback shall he maintained
for all structures along the north and east property
lines .
HEIGHT LIMIT
All buildings or structures located within one hun-
dred ( 100 ) feet of the north and east property lines
Oall maintain a maximum height limit of two ( 2 )
stories or twenty- five (25 ) feet , whichever is less .
ACCESS
Access shall be limited to Talbot Road South . ( If
access is allowed to South 37th Street , then twenty
20 ) feet: of additional right-of-way shall be dedi -
cated.
DEVELOPMENT PLANS
All Site development plans , including those of pubblic
or quasi -public institutions , shall be approved by the
Renton Planning Commission .
DURATION
These covenants shall run with the land and expire on
tecember 31 , 2020 .
Any violation or breach of these rer, tric. t ive
covenants may be enforced by pro; or lend ] pruceclrrrw; in the
Superior Court of King County by e i t her the ( i t y of I:eritori
or any property owners adjoining .,ubtec t piol,erI.y who dre
adversely affected by said breath .
William Stewart Pope Ellen White Pope
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
COUNTY OF KING
On this day of 19 before me per-
sonally appeared and
the persons who executed the within and
foreuoing instrument .
4
and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary
act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and
a'fixed my official seal the day and year first above written .
kSdM `'!
J v.
Notary Public in and` fpr' jhe • Sa'te
of Washington , restd ' + 1C;r411
U") O -14 WJ1V'
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
APRIL 24 , 1979
APPLICANT : GLIEGE CORPORATION
FILE NO : SA-325-79
A . SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST :
The applicant requests site approval for development of a
50 , 000 square foot medical office facility in a P-1 zone ,
in two phases . Phase 1 will consist of a 3-story building of
34 , 600 square feet to be constructed immediately . The Phase 2
will follow at a later date . (Site development map attached . )
B . GENERAL INFORMATION :
1 . Owner of Record : A . DANIEL DANSEREAU FOR
VALLIS JOINT VENTURE
2 . Applicant : GLIEGE CORPORATION
3 . Location :Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road
Vicinity map attached ) South
4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is
available on file in the Renton
Planning Department .
5 . Size of Property :5 . 5 acres
6 . Access : Via S . 37th Street
7 . Existing Zoning : P-1 , Public Use
8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : P- 1 , Public Use District , SR-1 ,
Single Family Residence ; G-9600 ,
General Classification District
9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Public and Quasi Public
10 . Notification :The applicant was notified in
writing of the hearing date .
Notice was properly publised in the
Record Chronicle on April 13 , 1979
and posted on three places on or
near the site as required by City
Ordinance on April 11 , 1979 .
C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND :
The subject site was annexed into the City on April 15 , 1959 ,
by Ordinance No . 1743 . The Comprehensive Plan in the area was
studied and amended on October 22 , 1974 . The subject site was
rezoned to P-1 on July 11 , 1975 , by Ordinance No . 2944 . Certain
restrictive covenants dealing with retention of the natural character
of the site and ravine area , together with certain developmental
requirements , were filed on July 23 , 1975 , and run with the land .
The subject parcel was part of Short Plat 113-77 approved by the
Hearing Examiner on January 31 , 1978.
LANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : GLIEGE CORPORATION , FILE NO : SA-325-79
APRIL 24 , 1979
PAGE TWO
D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND :
1 . Topography : The site slopes downward to the west at approxi -
mately a 10% grade .
2 . Soils : A majority of the site consists of Indianola Loamy
Fine Sane ( InC ) . This soil has rapid permeability ; available
water capacity is moderate; runoff is slow to medium; and erosion
hazard is slight to moderate . This soil is used for timber and
for urban development . The ravine area consists of Alderwood
Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC ) , Runoff is medium, and erosion hazard
is severe . The slippage potential is moderate . This Alderwood
Soil is used mostly for timber . This soil does not appear
to be appropriate for urban-type development .
3 . Vegetation : The site is heavily wooded with an abundant
cover of evergreen and deciduous trees , Groundcover consists
principally of brambles . Restrictive covenants designate
the existing significant trees and the ravine area for
preservation and incorporation into the development of the
site . The ravine area is to be preserved in its natural woodland-
type state or enhanced with suitable native-type vegetation .
4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide suitable
habitat for birds and small mammals .
5 . Water : A small stream runs along the southerly boundary of the
subject property .
6. Land Use : There is an existing single family residence located
to the east of the subject site . There are existing clinics
located south and southeast of the subject site . Valley General
Hospital is located approximately 1 /8 mile south of
the subject site . There are existing single family residences
located directly north of the subject site on the north side of
South 37th Street and east of the subject site on the east side
of Talbot Road South .
E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :
The area is characterized by a mixture of single family residences
and public/quasi -public uses in the form of the hospital and supportiv
medical clinics .
F . PUBLIC SERVICES :
1 . Water and Sewer : There is an existing 20 inch water main
located along Talbot Road South and an existing Metro Sewer
gravity line located along South 37th Street and Talbot Road
South . Storm sewers are not available in the area . There are
drainage ditches , however , and any development on the site
will be subject to suitable storm water retention and oil /water
separation facilities prior to out-flow from the site .
2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per
ordinance requirements .
3. Transit: Metro Transit Route #145 operates along S . W . 43rd
Street approximately 1 /4 mile south of the subject site .
4 . Schools : The subject site is not in close proximity to any
existing schools , and the proposed project will not have an
effect on existing school population except possible indirectly
through increased employment opportunities in the area .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : GLIEGE CORPORATION , FILE NO : SA-325-79
APRIL 24 , 1979
PAGE THREE
5 . Recreation : The subject site is approximately one mile south
of Tablot Hill Park .
H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE :
1 . Section 4-710 , P-1 , Public District
2 . Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading
I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT :
1 . Natural Systems : Development of the site will disturb soil
and vegetation , increase storm water runoff , and has an effect
on noise levels in the area . However, these can be mitigated
by proper development controls and procedures and adherence
to the existing restrictive covenants and sound planning principals
and practices .
2 . Population/Employment : The nature of the use is such that
there isn ' t likely to be any significant effect on population .
3. Schools : Not Applicable .
4 . Social : Changing the use from low density , single family
residential to quasi -public , medical clinic , may result in
additional social interaction at the site as well as in the
surrounding area .
5. Traffic : The proposed medical office facility will generate
approximately 3765 additional vehicle trips per day ( 75 trips
per 1000 square feet ) between the S . 37th Street and Talbot Road
South . This is a 65% traffic increase over the existing 5775
daily traffic trips on Talbot Road South in this vicinity .
J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION :
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the
State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended RCW 43-21C ,
the Planning Director has prepared a proposed declaration of environ-
mental significance . Issues of traffic access , impact on the
adjoining single family homes , encroachment into the ravine area ,
and site development master plan remain to be resolved . An EIS
may he required to address these issues unless an amended application
is submitted .
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED :
1 . City of Renton Building Division .
2 . City of Renton Engineering Division .
3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division .
4 . City of Renton Utilities Division .
5 . City of Renton Fire Department.
L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS :
1 . The applicant ' s two-phased development proposal is generally
consistent with the P-1 zoning for the subject site. However,
the restrictive covenants ( copies attached) define more specific
development criteria due to the unique features of the site
including proximate to single family homes and natural stream/
ravine which crosses the site . The covenants were established
at the time of the rezoning of the site to insure compliance
with the Comprehensive Plan which clearly designates a portion
of the site for preservation of the stream area for permanent
greenbelt . The proposed development substantially conflicts
with these covenants .
A review of the records of previous actions on the subject site
indicates that commitments were made by the property owner to
provide for development of the site to a P. U . D. master plan
approach to insure compatibility of the development to the site.
The submitted application does not provide for this approach .
PILANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : GLIEGE CORPORATION , FILE NO : SA-325-79
APRIL 24 , 1979
PAGE FOUR
2 . In reviewing this proposal , a substantial number of unresolved
questions have been raised related to the environmental impact
of this development. These include :
1 ) Public access and improvements :
a . To Talbot Road
b . On-site
c . Street improvements
d . Total traffic generated
e. Proposed street vacation
2 ) Impacts upon the existing ravine and adjoining single
family uses
3 ) Site development intensity , structure types and sizes .
Without substantial modification to the proposal ,
an EIS will be required . The staff and applicant are
attempting to resolve these issues , however , a continuance
is required .
3 . The Engineering Division advises that storm water retention
and detention will be required and that curb , gutter , sidewalk ,
storm drainage and paving will be required on S . 37th Street .
This division also notes that lots 1 , 2 , and 3 have petitioned
for the vacation of the access road . This leaves the access to
lot 4 in question .
4 . The Fire Department indicates that the project must meet fire
flow requirements . Also , fire protection appliance type and
number shall be installed as per the requirements of the Fire
Chief along with ingress and egress and fire hydrant number .
Watermains and hydrants are to be installed prior and previous
to any building construction . Also , uniform fire code requirements
for occupancy type and use must be met .
5 . Utilities Engineering notes that the subject site is
in a location that is complex for water service . Approval ,
therefore , would be subject to approved water and sewer plans
and payment of standard hook-up fees for water and sewer .
Additional comments of other departments are attached for
consideration .
M . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION :
Based upon the above analysis , and need for an EIS or amended
application , and due to the remaining environmental issues , this
public hearing must be continued indefinitely to be readvertised
at such time as the issues are addressed in an EIS or modified in
the application .
fir;I
1 Vr Y \ }
4 le .ist'c''".
r:
1 -.S.
iljlk . ;"1,
1 _
en fm0199.91•91~9/119 •
zI
11
i.ia,
422_ ,
f
I I
I r
r
SR-1r1
1
g , •
31. / .., i
i It 7.•4 .,
l
W I
i7VV\V` SIR +•, V
I s.`L l
SITEir i
W
Il 29 30 31 32 33 w
n a
1 = .i m.T •1
i '1
9..;
n "
O O/ 11
I
2'
1..
7
a
2,
1.17 3.r+ _...(..
y..'''}r...1.T
L-I 1 ._
Ot-3
ZONING COR
i pi,
GLIEGE CORPORATION
SA-324-79
APPL I CANT GLIEGE CORPORATIQN TOTAL AREA ±5.5 acres
PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via S. 37th Street
E X I S1 I NG ZONING P-1, Public Use
EXISTING USE Undeveloped
PROPOSED USE Medical Office facility in P-1 Zone
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Public and Quasi Public
COMMENTS
i
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO : O Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
OPark Department
Oolice Department
Public Works Department
O ilding Div .
Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description )
8 Traffic Engineering Div .
Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or
his esign))
Wai6 DATE : %
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT :41/1/169LOCATION :sf e l
APPLICATION( S ) :
6A _ 79
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING M
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
EJ Approved 0 Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
J
i
i
1"-/-
7_,f j 1
zJ//'///k-_ t T. ,
i 4
Mature of Director or Authorized Representat(ve Dite
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : 1 /- ric l_ d , it,,_ -- /n, (,
Approved 0 Not Approved
Corrlments or conditions :
zi,,,, ,L, , , „ ,s----
Y' 0,V,...1
2.,
2 ,
Sianature of Director or Authorized Represent ive Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : in C-
d Approved Not Approved ,,,e,5i ,r-ff-c7 i/ ,-<-4,'4..
Comments or conditions : 4,,j,.-74.-„, . /,rG- oz ,- -7-/o/,,
4, /.04//..vCG iYr /I,u7 .iler/r.-3G/C Sri/ - L 7A-4f`i-ll.« 's lure /mac Cif"c7-71
fee-('u// ".`7j?j. -i'-c SS -4-.1-40 -‘ -C`.S .4.-4 /'J ,i i 7/Y/)/2,fx. i/Lu/--u 1C /I S
it- i' f; ' c iliel S xc Cki c -7. Gt-i3 e_ rr/9-.4 5 /FA/ r- r/5'/%AiA, 7 f 7
L /Av.S7 4G /,.Bare is 1 ) !'y-t.,c.. .} - Y /34 VC: C '•cS"712Kc7,s,i
cyt,57 AfGe.- "1 f C ie-66;u/JZG flGti IJ /-..,l l:,,r,-.t-A-c"'/i-z G!-A- -, s.,JG=
gnature o D rector or uthor ' a Representat ve ate
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : LUCK `'I I),Pr
C] Approved Q Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
iiiiiiialIPPrfil(ASLid4Ct (f,,, gyp, ; i ) L c L i
t6.)C ::i rL /i..4 A'' 'aci.':%2 L,,, , ,,,,
i
I i l- i t 17 O-^ i ,;)r CA d.- I ( /t" `-' .. it... j r,r. 1. ,.
0 ° 41"-- /71
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :fxx . t
Q Approved 0 Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
1
Cir."- /1/6. ' - '4-
date /Signature of 6irector or Authorized-Representative
ROUTING FOR JIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHE IST FORMS
TO : O Finance Department
Fire Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
OPublic Works Department
Building Div.
Engineering Div .
raffle Engineering Div .
0 Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designee )/,/
neJ tom
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 11 1-1/ ; Application No . :_4_40
Action Name :
l 4 ( 7
Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) :
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :d grzc _L t$,CG I N E€ P.. 1 f\,'
SIGNIFICANT INON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
y//77
Signature of Director or Authorized Rep esentative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
S
Co ,NIFICANT ANON GNIFICANT
mments :
Signature of Director or Authorized. Representat e Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :_ATic.1 `i
SIGNIFICANT NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
1
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da e
PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANLr./NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No . SA-325-79 X PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No. ECF-447-79 FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Site approval for development of a 50,000 sq. ft. medical
office bldg. facility in a P-1 zone in two phases. Phase 1 to consist of a 3-story
building of 34,600 sq. ft. to be constructed immediately; Phase 2 at a later date.
Proponent GLIEGE CORPORATION
Location of Proposal Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South
Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal has been determined to co have not hav a
si nificant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS LJ is
is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was
ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : A substantial number of
unresolved questions have been raised related to the environmental impact of this
development. These include: (1) Public access and improvements: a. to Talbot Road,
b. Un-site, c. street improvements, d. total traftic generated, e. proposed street
vacation; (2) Impacts upon the existing ravine and adjoining single family uses;
3) Site development intensity, structure types and sizes. Without subtantial modificatic
to the proposal , and EIS will be required.
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final )
declaration of non-significance :
Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN
Title PLANNI ( 1I6' OR Date April 18. 1979
Signature //'
00 City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
y
j ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO : O Finance Department
1
Fire Department.---
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
0 Public Works Department
Building Div .
Engineering Div .
OTraffic Engineering Div .
0-Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designee )
dike _e_1,&A 0/19
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 7 ; Application No . : 440119
Action Name : 44 e (d,e(!__ x/eogf0__________
a
Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : i/ /'/ 29
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : 2/fC
SIGNIFICANT Id'NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
7S /3c:4
Signature Director Author zed Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : Ti_ .`,)
SIGNIFICANT ION SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
Si,gnat`ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date
p p.',7 cA'Afr ,a e/
Y
OF f
1 © THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
oamIL CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
35
Aoq April 19, 1979
235- 2550
gTFp SEPT '
O
Mr. Larry Gibson
3713 Talbot Road South
Renton, Washington 98055
RE: SA-325-79, GLIEGE CORPORATION
MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING ON TALBOT ROAD SOUTH
Dear Mr. Gibson:
The above referenced two-phase project has been reviewed for compliance with
the Comprehensive Plan, restrictive covenants, and prior commitments of Vallis
Investors regarding development of this property. The proposed development as
presently proposed is in conflict with each of these items.
The restrictive covenants adopted with the rezoning of the property were
intended to implement the significant features of the Comprehensive Plan to
preserve the ravine/stream area in a fully natural state, and to protect
adjoining sinole family uses from any potentially incompatible uses. The
proposed development does not adequately take these restrictions into account.
Further, commitments were made on the part of Vallis Investors during pre-
application meetings to develop the entire property under a PUD Master Plan
approach as referenced in the minutes of the initial development application
November 17, 1977) and short plat (January 24, 1978) . Without the PUD
approach with its provisions for phased development of the property, and
assurances that the development will comply with the covenants and Comprehen-
sive Plan, an environmental impact statement would be necessary to address
these issues. The areas of specific concern are listed. (Note proposed
Declaration of Significance. )
Major revision of the proposed development of the entire 9± acre site under
a PUD approach providing for lower intensity structures, improved access,
and compliance with the restrictive covenants may be satisfactory as an
alternative to an EIS.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact this department.
Very truly yours,
Gordon Y. Erickse
Planning Direct.
V/ak, ke %-
7
Ba id R.' lemens
Associate Planner
CC: Gliege Corporation
Vallis Joint Venture
4.
PROPOSED/FINAL D...,LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/I. .4-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No . SA-325-79 X) PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No . ECF-447-79 0 FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Site approval for development of a 50,000 sq. ft. medical
office bldg. facility in a P-1 zone in two phases. Phase 1 to consist of a 3-story
building of 34,600 sq. ft. to be constructed immediately; Phase 2 at a later date.
Proponent GLIEGE CORPORATION
Location of Proposal Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South
Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal has been determined to ED have ED not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS © is
no is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was
maTTe after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : A substantial number
unresolved questions have been raised related to the environmental impact of this
development. These include: (1) Public access and improvements: a. to Talbot Road,
b. Un-site, c. street improvements, d. total tratt1c generated, e. proposed street
vacation; (2) Impacts upon the existing ravine and adjoining single family uses;
3) Site development intensity, structure types and sizes. without subtantial modificat
to the proposal , and EIS will be required.
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) '
declaration of non-significance :
Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN
Ti t 1 e PLANNI I I`' OR ‘0Date April 18, 1979
Signature
ier i City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
OF R.t,
oivimaTHECITYOFRENTON
U ti 4 ' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
o . R ivi- CHARLES J. DELAURENTI I
MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
9.o Qom.
235- 2550
o
ggTFO SEPt,
B
April 12 , 1979
Charles Gliege , President
Gliege Corporation , for
Renton Medical Joint Venture
155 N . E . 100th St .
Suite 403- 1
Seattle , Washington 98125
RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE
AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL
IN P- 1 ZONE ; FILE NO : SA- 325-79 ; property located on west
side of Talbot Road South of 37th Street , Renton .
Dear Mr . Gliege :
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on March 27 , 1979 A public
hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been
set for April 24 , 1979 at 9 : 00 a . m
Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present .
Al ' interested persons are invited to attend the hearing .
If you have any further questions , please call the Renton
Planning Department , 235-2550.
Very truly yours ,
Go -don Y . Ericksen
Planning Director
B y : ( 4 ,/a/'
David R . C' emens ,
Associate Planner
cc : A . Daniel Dansereau for
Vallis Investors
11120 NE 2nd Street
Bellevue , WA 98004
Sh , lter Enterprises Corporation
623 Ivy Avenue
Coquitlam , B . C . V3J 2H8
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBL::C HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON ,
WASHINGTON , ON APRIL 24 19 79 , AT 9 : 00 ;,. M. TO CONSIDER
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS :
1 . CENTRAL PUGET , INC. ; APPLICATION FOR SITE
APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING
IN M-P ZONE , File SA-324-79 ; property located on
S . W . 7th St . , west of Hormel Company , in Earlington
Industrial Park .
2 . GLIEGE CORPORATION FOR RENTON MEDICAL JOINT
VENTURE ; APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO
CONSTRUCT TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS ( RENTON
MEDICAL CENTER) IN P- 1ZONE , File SA-325-79 ;
property located in the vicinity of 3713 Talbot
Road South immediately south of South 37th Street.
Legal descriptions of all applications noted above
are on file in the Renton Planning Department.
ALL INTL;RESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 24 , 1979 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO
EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
GORDON Y . ERICKSEN
PUBLISHED April 13 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
1 , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPItS
OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn
to before me, a Notary Public ,
on the_llthday of April
l1979 . SIGNED 2
Qilege Corporation
Suite 403-4 • Northgate Executive Centre • 155 Northeast 100th • Seattle,Washington 08125 • 1206) 522-8586
Patch 23, 1979
7-6 1V
P.Lann_uw Depa/z ttnen t OINEb °
The C,Lttz. o4 Renton
200 IIU LL five. South APR 2e7 1919
Renton, LYa4h. 98055
j,`NGD v
U.ten .Lan IUi. Davy 2. C.1Lenen,
Re: Renton ,"!edica.L Bu,i.Ld ink D4opodai.
Dealt r n. GLe ten4,
T t7theA -ta mut -Le:f te't of_ T e&-ttwuty. 19th,, 3 as
attaching the 4ert, hint; equ i it.e.d won the
4-t to a.wp4ova.L he.aJan.r ulih n24pect -to can. przopo4ed
n dLcat ceii-te,.. fattek.La,L c4 PI orlr4:
1- 4_ Ld.av%.t o.4 at:rne,t4 h-
2- Cight co p.ie 4 o.f. the plot p Lan
3- ELt ht co p Le ei o4 a uiciaity.. nao a i ,te u iite d
4- T hrtee_ co p i..e4 o . a .Lan.d4 ca?.e p-La i, it-Le-Ludt/4 ph.ai e
one and two.
5- Mimee cop c,e4 o,4 ba Ud in.ga e,Leua t,Lon4
6- One copy. each 81/2" x 14"- plot t a1., tandacaping plan,
e.Leva Uon4.
0o04 you pLca4e a tatt.ie a heatta% date a.4 400n ad
po64thLe.
Yo urr o .t WJ4,
Ch air l.LA C ge.
Builders • Engineers • Management Contractors • Mortgage Financing
I 4' . a - '
Y' r
k tit. l+
lS y' A.
s ° t t a1.1i 1MI" t
t
t
Sjt •i ,, f f rl,{ .r;4.1
5.. ;4 a-.
itiJ^d 1 f,-- .
fCeti
ti •
i1
i '-'i v ,
t
91 •ci
t
X i''; .,_,
h'
i t .;
Ira Rr 4,-
air..•
t
a 2•\;,,07 "...... /....-"...- ----
0...........
H .
i f PARKING
REQUIRED 173 CARS
PROVIDED 174 CARS
r•. ®,,., y. SITE AREA 113,440 S.F.F. 2.604 ACRES
wl
le illarlift !
t der I FINISH GRADE i—
i LOT 2 t
ot477
lidCt.) I elit r-,
f 11MT
II
7
lii
Au EXISTING HOUSE
4N'',._IINRI q q
1
a
Irn
t
i
i
ea- I
rt/...Ir.,•
Ex
4
ip .
4,___.
t „..i Wir 11:-.,''' 16 .
0 ACCESS ROADWAY
so
f 0
N.
N.
REVISIONS
t •-. •
f
day ,.
i
k `
r
F . ,;
t,
M ;
y'.:
y !..
Cf.
fit«
K4;
1 :•,,..,_. + .
f
f
iJ%
t!
illa^
I
v .
I"
r
Zt
c*-
4-------, .
1 . .
1:,.:
P.::
4C. .... .‘.'::://..::::.
e::
11:'.....;•1'‘'..:'‘
5;:
fl::.""
I'':•
i'.. .:::...:..;' :
7:
lb
wri
01:: , .
113
CAN'
0 .
kf'r
I
liaf.
o
1'
um
I
I
1
I
i
I
CURS
1j
I ,
I
y
i2
CARS
I
n
r '
1;
w
I
lit/
miiil'
I
I
I•
ao
I
0
it
i.yF
0
rf
I
y `
r
9'
A
142olc4as
I
C\
3
y
i
I
II
IZC4AS/
I
I
1%
I
I
i
1
xZ
411L...
0V
IOW
Jy
0f
112 [
ARS
I
A'
h
i. ' ' ''''
N
CARS .'/'
I
y
4 /•//,
1•ff
LIMIT
s _
f
o
4 4 •o.. t4-- .,;•','.'' y,- ,
o-i,-A,"v••• .40.•t-,'•,.k
w4:•tcP'--. ...... .1.'', If', %,-.146.1.1'' '''''°'
r ', • : ' 44*,?. 4.. '
i•
tolgt.,:ir 4,.. 4 ; 0 r ilia ,,. ,
t, ,..1".41*,414• '''...,'..::' e.
11..Vt.X. '''t...'41,,:r.1'14.' ', , *il.offik 4,1 •,,,, .,,: ,*.
4 i,,,Arkt . * , ^..% •
0..44 4%.' g" .;4-tls tt: .1 , '1'•rik .' ' ,
I • . • ' .I S'4,'ill X.f i1 • ,,, . '.4i' '''.,'''4, .
4'••1•.:A. I. ,. .01yil,• *Wel, i. e,... .
4. .,1,1.- ,fro ;No :.-., - ;,... ••,..‘ I.,. e$,_"vv.4,4c.1vliQr, ii 1st.•,4,..si.14 '. ri, " ....0 '-..nw'r.,Nr y;.4
c4r is,,,....r.. •31 11 r., ':
s, ,„,„
44 .'10,;t:' r .F5';),..lt1 ,..x.. ,...:,.,:k; %.,
t4„4",„,i ..
t..., ,•t.:.,...• ,
x.• 1 t'; .....: t s.‘'.e*i A .t V. 1:+,'5:1-.*,.%6,
e;4::'.-,,,Tuaf:
vr.\\
v ,44410.•ff,, ,
R
L. - ...;;...„,
lak ., •
e e
1. deL4., ,•
kr 6.t.
7."-fir".•••,•,...........
1 $
A.,,fki.''' VI * ',*W:tr7' f.' •1 c e,- ,. - ,.,.\,.
ic•C,k. ..' IV r' i:vi,, '
t" , '
t,''''1/2-:*••i-"..V...r.7••:, ;--
N, •-".• •
1311e4f.S
Ft EET4,ar,••. .. -.. , ."".....'•-•---------__„-
litztc.. ---..'-' •, . ,.1 4.4•48,4.P,,,,--,,.,,,,,,.. .. ••_,
PRoJecT sounorm-i•-•-•------...„.....Ak,•:.•... .
tr. ... ,
t.,
r
Wief C ,,, • ,,, +
Ripl,..tk%le tIN:. •••'
4.6.4•4A.:• r " .
1'.
r. . . 7..t."".",".'"......repop„, .
v
emlftp
1%V.6‘t.f. , • .. - -
cm' ' " .",,,- ' •
tt4 1r .I1117at
4de 'a iI ‘‘i
A SPHALT ROADWAY V P •
CiwAr
u V 1 I I I
Irli4tv. • !I; o
r
44
1 1; :
Si%':i' 1 1ad
It.i.::‘. II Ir‘ti, 1 dey . al1siltoite15
I! V ---------------
5.sww.4Lo---T----------------.---------.-_ I 4" i_______
1
I 7eyAZ405. :‘.:'
r-"*'.........' '“'. ' •-^ -..-... ."••-
t''''''-'4:. :3..".
1•61-".''.'.."'-'-' Vfr __,','-• ••....-..1....... _ '• .' ',Av..°i-- --' ...1 IA'11111111111111 tet,o.,:w. rsocix.xs..1.9A-.$, --:= :-.'•.":::".77. ''..--4,..-Is,. - :, ' C ) 17 ''.•-•-•."'. •"'4,t1:-.-11t.::---
e:-A',4......"...›.t A"c.14- -----'•^',4-=-. `4'":,- ...t. 4..........
ckr• r •...- •t- - - --. ,,, -,..., • - •
e4:eee‘,...I.L,,,,cri.e.7-..- i 444^..
e->z.-ts". -
2" 122% • V. ..tiji•e4;,...4"... "•
kelkiv..?..4f.N 3 P-44"
f4.
f '''17...-77 -74.:•"'147:::t-....,. --''''''":,',....
i• 1.4:::&;
44..7.----.1%. '?:' r
I -; ..- -.-. .--
n---,---.4 ta
i!:.:T I d •-•••:---:,' ^-,.,,
r' ''..etk*::::?',1r,:'.3t5"1..,
v--:-'-.;-- , -
1. 1".";
s -0';": -..'
cl'G!`?=. -::--%--
1ts
4),-- .... -',(1.4o0,.....-.--..-....,
N.
7...zs
s."...:
A.
2 '
ar.. . ••••••-•°4
3,*,...'":
7.7,,,,,.,,,:,.,_:„..,-1-,.,' t4.' ''‘'..--' t'.--.
i... ....,•*••• -1:‘,•,--,
t..A.,,...,.. .• - ..... .„..--4-..---s -- , -.- •/.. -
1, ......; -,-,a •,k.14"--4,':S.-.-..--- ; .-,..,...4..A.; 4.,:--4.4" ,..4- •,'•
1/4 1111111E1111 g .f_, N.,,___'.•%"' 14'',*1.,414,4,'1 .,
t4,t,. ..4.44-.,,,,--•••.,-..,7•_--777,-..;: •"'":7"
5-..,,,,•-4.z w,.. ,l-kw-•,-,- '- ..- . ,: , . '
vs.-'"<'-.5, n -s"--,4*-..,-;,-.....:..;,......,` 7 -, .."-;z-.41:-l'14.:-.:-•.„,
4,z4ie:t.": ig.
r .,
fta,A,;_,...A,,...i,.-, •-,
L.. .." IA_ ,•••.,.. - • . /
to.
7.-- ...VW...! -".., - -.v- -...---,..--r..4.....,:"..._
a., <
41"
I•
IIIII.\.,‘.:
41:
0:1; \1:
1..:;)'. .,.,,..-'
1'1: ''::
i
11.'..‘:';':
I."'"."'''''' -'
1.:
15111
liI 14.14 IIWla.
14.:T.
L:..,:..".1'7:,''4a:'...
4111'1I'L'•..'
74%.:':.:.li::::::::.4''.
1.:'
Lt"."1-t41'4: .;:
As:
PZ::::"
l'Il'...
4"'M.-
1411':47.":.*'*
44 4-.'''.
1-
1.
1t4;°.: ...
P..:::'...: :
4
i
ta,......
rt •4 *1
i. 74....
N.
N.. t' • • , '
iNwrillit ED
N
N\
1•S
F•; 3 E D BOON
7--, _ ....._...."N4E0.ef1/4,
4
1'
els"
413
i,
f
ii
Vi
1
I ' iiiiiiil
P : "..:
1
r
y
1
w \
t4
1 . .
4 ., ,
fil .
r!
t,
iill(
kiliii
4
IliiillOillii
tl '
itli'
t `;
t.
t.
4'
ii, ' ; •:.!
1
0 -
1.
411[--
8_" - -
a ,
is ' '
14'
a
1
1.
II.
4',• ; .
I. •
i
r ' '' % ' '
t
M
t .
p.... ••
11
1 }
Myn.•
a
ai .
NNMN
11
1
0-
7l
1 / • /
J
6
r, . .
v4
1
ii,
47';
er , .
A.,
y
fY -
n.'.• „
o
oRF1 )\
1
I
iEIiWf
a
i•
1
i
i ...',,
l'..,'..--
e
7;;;
10'
61.!
37:
14
lh
e:. ...
ii .
5.1:
74W '', .-
0.....,:
e-
T•
tv-; '
47C/
4 .
b
ff
9r,
h.1
R ,
1 _
0 \
1
I
i
anr
ti
I
t
v
t
3
G
I.
v.
1
4f,it .
i,
f.
CI
1 •`
did
tl
1
i
0
1 . -„_ .
1. .
lt,
10
io '
ip
o
1
1
e ,,,,
v
u
w. .• -
t-
r :
1?
1
41:
4
1
I
1
F
I .
I
Q
l
Q
a.
a.,
1
I '-
1' ' ,
1
titi
1.
o
c.
l
tr;
4
P' /
4 ,
S
r.,„,,,,,,
s.,...,__,„,, , . ...,.... . ,.. •
4
1
t‘
ji-C :-:
iP-) "
01i
i„..........„.
11-•
c,
1\ • ^
1,
0
0
i;
4
f
c6,,
1•,',.-•`, ', ,,,
7. ... •, '• '.. ''. , ,
71../
Jr:
N-
6- ' ' ':
1[.....-.' ''..'';:
II'.'• ••'`.•
1. . ' .' .:• '
i
e
r ,. • •
i .
1, . . , ,
t
r., __,...:
Z. . ' . • '
3
41;› . .
7. . . ,
a
f
today..
I :
t..; ..• -•...
I....'-.
I ^
41...3:
I
I
k
46:
4% '' •
l' .
1
5 . .
i • • . . .
4';.
a •
10..
1 ,
f,
I .
il4
i
r
I
i .
i • •
1-
7/
i
g
2 ' '
II
1.
I •
0
f;._,. ......'
2.
1:641,
r.,k3...../.....
7............._,...1ar
hi,
A4* .
i.4:0. •
z •a -
t
ei
1114,/
VI.
4
14)
10,
1 ,/
1..
0 . . .
k.. ...
2:, ..,,,.-.-.. ; . . • • . •
a. —
44. .:"
14,,,
le • .
0*- • ' :
Ail' . .
4V .. .
iv
1
a
4IC- '
i,
1,,..
I
7,
7777:- ..-- ... - :
s'
l •
10t3
0
7,
410,
r, 711.
0j.
1
ilt
1
I
1
t '..° ...;
i
I ,//' %
I///
I
tri• . .4
7 / ., /<'"---
4 '
41,
10
i
I
1.
1.
1t
le --.. .---...
t.
t•:
lit ,
X.
r_ ._,!.._..,„.........
7,/
I
V%..,
1 •
N
G
0-.
1 .
0----...
i
it
I • .- ' '
1
Pi.'''‘.
4.
D •.___
if/
tis.
f..
i, (..,;,-.•,:,-•::.:' : •••• -
11 ..„,
it
1,;,!,...;;.
1,!,
41111i):::';
q.:
11 '
Asi.
t.
1
st
3414, ---"•-•-•""'-'
N''''''
J/.
1 :
i.:/..! : '.
i`'
i•
tr::.
i
t •'
i!,
4
t.
I / '•
Li• • ‘'
lig
S •
4:
e.$$
1,••,-
1-.•
I;
Of•, /..,•;(.•,.• :
7 :
1!;!...
P... .
if
C'
t.
x.
ii
r '
I /
I.
4.
I.
4',
3. ;'
i:.•
ri .
14,.%
4';'$
1 ',
I
4
L,
I,
A..
I
I.
0.
1.•,
i14:
t .
11,..'':
It,' ;•
10.
41'
i
1
A .
I
1
V •
1,',
41.
511
c•-• ,-•
f• .
1,•:
fr .
i... .'.
44.14.—is
1 _
1!).,..-••,
I.
f,"
ii.'
I%:. '•
I
IP,. .
1, /•,,.
R.
rg,' ,
i
f',
a .
i4.!.,;,,
i
V.,
i
M:
1;
11,
1'
I.:•
lt,';
tit
1 . . •
In,
c:
1•
4:
91,/
et,
i4:•
i ,
f;'.''
s -..
i'..;
I/
1 /
i
s;,' '..,,••••:'. . %
i
lifi,.'.
1tplittj.
I.' ,.•
t ,•
11I. , ! •
ilt'''';" .
1; - :,'-
i • '
t.
f.:,.
14..
f,
3,•••!••••,,,..,,
i:•
41"
i..
t.,
11N, :,‘,
i
t• ..;••, '•••: ,.• .,.. —
IL,.
4• ,..,.
4..
Vi;,: .
s.,...
1
il
Aril
tii.,:
lli' ;••,
if:.!.
lilt)
1 ‘.
t•,/,
ii.-,..
1. :
zr
I.
k,
7
d, ,
0 .
11 ..- )•
tt
ls.
i'''
i
7111..,
t.
t.
t ,•,, / /
I -
4k'', /
4.;.,'.:', .,
I :,
0 _.....___
1 • ,
i,:!(.
1.,
Y,
ii.
11::•.[
4::
L.
o.:
v../ • /
I
7
It1-
0
cat ,
am
ft..., ;
r
j.:
1. ., .•. .. :. :
lit."' .• ''.
4.,
1---,,,. ‘--- .
r.
04!
0/
tti-
ag .„„.
L'•'' -••' '''..: '''' ,
It1/..
1.'• •• • ' '•' .
0,
1,
44? ---'''''"--•
i ;'
I .
1/.• . - /' .•
010
g,
i
14
4
L..
1
1 ?..
f:
le
I
I
tia
woe
e
1 .
1 , . ,
I
l•
ae4--•
Oie. ----:- , .
V ---"-
frl
e.?
c •
1
i...: . .; ;, :•
di", .. . , , •
i •
4'
11 '.• . • •
p,..•
4!..
t .
llefts4
1..,_
I •,,,•:..
t:,.
I.
4......_
I______ •1. ,... '!..
1. •
I. •
I
L.:....., • .
i
I
I
I
40
im. Ta.% .
itlii .
1
is . • .
tfr
i
is.
4 '• :
V.
1/
1.''
ti.,• -.------,..„
7&_________ .
15.„‘
sfa
0:
71'
I * "
7,
14t,
I
di
f
7
te.', •
A .....
H.____
Z-••
fc1 ...____..,______ .
4......_:,./.. ...........,,,,,,,
Y
V".4•3
I
f, • '
c
i
LI;
is......---.-...........• • •
ArNs
it, , .
o,,, ..
tli':
fZsIli.t..
N".....-_.
I
11,
L..,,....
t': .,' •
I'
6 •
I .
2.'
1.-".!•.' " •
1
r?,
11j:`!..•• '` '"
111.. . . .
yr
r.,w'Air 1,W,(L}r 7sKtif
et ''
I,
l,
t A
r'
O \
r ,
r'w+,I"-`4'(i'-" n '
J.-j '. , - '
y• /
kA - ' P. i ?, ` ,
ei...„. .„
A ic17•1..4
7
E.r
17m IA
1 4•I :• a is ...±#4 1701 t, / / //
14.....4 I ' • 41 / zs.t.r•-17:::
0:1, i .11i. .?'?/
TT ri_j_T_1_
4..
1,,77-T.7 . ' ;.(
V / ,,
4.•,.
vg..i
i
iI/
1 I • .''CO a
Ifii
V .,
rill q
i'' —., _
r, 1 .1 /
s
0A ,..v . . // cfi'
t• .#
0..,.".,. \ "'Alfriiirs
r
jJye,t.
4,
si */ ill
Tff i .it:t
41.11!7,:
l
II 111I
f,,
Z.-.. 1 \ \l'i
QIIiiil
1/ \:,. L.1:
1 5--
it J
rI i.-.•—
r...
it:,,,,: ‘‘ .-itti----;
I .
44:4;;;)
4'
N'
s'
s
1----,"
5:E),/ -- , ,,IN m
0 c.
ti ...,.1 . ..____k :6,— 1I ,P.)
1?
1)y
4•is
is ,
L. ' r-- _--.t. ci.._ ,p i.
it,‘:::::::::.t F
G
1
TIMERMflKT v 0)0
I
1.7-
2z__-_----
7 __________
A ROOF 010
fw.., ____ _______,_„_____ ____.___ ______„____ ___..___ ______ =____
il!,,,,,i
i.„ ...
1.11.., ,i_ _
f' I'''1 I L it1- - L----'- h11 _ _- --_ -- -- _ ---_ --- —_ - - 11•0.0 RCM MO
MONTH EL EVAT I ON
ii• - •
1_1—.1- r
Fi __— _r -1r
ram r-
ram-
G -"- -
PM(ff f rEVIsro!+g
i
It z4S, nrri'VIVP00,:.'-.„..c7 \
L. f'c.3
s 1. . _r.+ yt,.rrF• T
OMOISnu It iT
i+'.r - j
sr mn-swtw rAwfcror o mfe,e.f 1
1`
lei
4.6_,, ,
I,..:
f
r J MEDICAL 6UILOiT:G-ELEVATIONS
a........r r••-neS'1--r i '•,Z•*"'`Z-4"v'90.*11.`r`•••-,^,Prrtir`sa[^••csz-..-......".
i'.I,
ri.: !f;II Iii1. I: Ifl {{1il;'III
i. ',' •
II I I j11 !11,lllllI.I
4 I Ih„ h0 ! - - --- i
111
IIill'{li
f 'yllfl i
I
j I. '__ __ ET _- ii, liltI •
I [
Mt[A{
CAST O1Y1Tt0q
lil1'iI IIIIL Lf4'II i n
t
rl
rr l ..,
it t !
III
I!tli i,
fl' I,i, ' t'1h
II1l `11!II
I:r
1 I l I!fh i I M,T III I,1 I!, I ,Il li I i
t1I1''y,1 ' 1'1 111111111i!,!1, 111 I,I..:,,111 1 i,, , 1
t ItI I IItIlf '
Ilry!
l'lli l
I 1 1,i 'li I!!Ill'If f1I 111 i 11i ;ill'II:I•!
n'': _
I. !iil I l p l
III 1,Iui.,l';!' ,.o.d ru
I 1/!
1 1I;,1 II' ( f 11 I!,1!11;.uf t n 9111• 11. h! y"Iith l,10 1 1f i11i, {i'I;ill ;', i 01 1I ill ill 1'•,,',1i11111: i` f(,,1,1
1 f,l,IIII!r,i,l„ff ,tIi fall li I III I, , l;iIrlit111: ,f I , ill , I,'P,f 1i111 f 1, , ti;'. I IIII!,i I
11; ,th;;'`l,{;,g1 W hfi;ip I;?;i ihif;!II, ;; : ii!i,ilu;,.Ih0u1
Il fl+'1{''{,if I li fl{t' ' f I! Ill IIII;i!;'(I 111{1 h iflfl 1 t 1 I si. _,
1 IIM I774'1'I IIII P IIllj II';! f1111I f 1:'I,,IIIII I l,II I t!uu 11 1'II!II;ill III;
1 1{Uln•n I ;
M q 1- :01 1 1 ' 11. li I ' b'1 1 f I,11, I!,11!I;i. , I1, .t1
s I IIII IFi.'r,,iiii.iitiliii,,,iilf'!I IfI`I `'lllfll I`;a'jihP;i
i, ; I'jl!'tl!I
P
r15roKSr_ 1t1.,, I t !
r4li !lo 1. If!j I,,iiif I,1al;;I C'nle,till.,h 1
t= _ i—t'_' 1:1 I__ ll(ILi i= 1 ;L.
I IIf1I-.;,', w.[w s C
fi • V \
A-r viTov+asu COP? A M -. iJI,Pb 'Z 'A
liy,.;:1 on[..os.aoarnaMs..a.as u
Mer YCJICAL BUILDING-[:[NATIONS ,7
I
0 0
OF R4,4
A.
w © o THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
n o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. w 235- 2550
o P
917-
SEPT,
f,0
February 22 , 1979
Gliege Corporation
155 N . E . 100th
Suite 403- 1
Seattle , Washington 98125
Gentlemen :
We have received a partial application for a proposed
medical center on the west side of Talbot Road South in
the city of Renton . We have reviewed the submitted fees ,
and they appear to be in conformance with City require-
ments . We do not , however , have sufficient plans to
proceed with this application at this time . We have
enclosed a copy of the materials required for an appli -
cation . As soon as we receive the additional copies
of the plans , we will be happy to proceed with the
processing of your application .
Very truly yours ,
Gor p Y . Ericksen
P1 nning Dir, r
7/ /Z(V /(-- (C,Oteit,-'}
i c.
Vid R. Clemens
Associate Planner
DRC : wr
Enclosures
F RENT41100L0LI: )% CITY OF RENTON
v APPLICATION
FE8 w SITE APPROVAL
FOR i(' CE USE
NiNG OQ
q
File No. Z Filing Date 2/
Application Fee $ 3C) Receipt No .SSJ
er
Environmental Review Fee $ ap -
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :
1 . Name CLLe..cye Confona ti an, -Ica Renton. ',1e.d i.cc-L la-th t Phone 522-8586
Address Swi to 403-1 155 11,6. 100.th St. Uen tu4e.
2 . Property location
Seatt.Le,igadh.
Wet Side TaLbo. toad, South a.f. 37th Stiee-t, Ren-ton
3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary)
Cot. 4 . £a,.t UcLLLeu (fed i ca L Pa.k P-La t A l'e-zo,</>6^7) c'/3e/./
c oW -c : I/7c., tie,.
4. Number of acres or square feet 5.483 Rc4e4 Present zoning P-1
5 . What do you propose to develop on this property?
Two me cLi.ca L o/,P.i ce 1rwi.l d,Lng4
6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application :
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks ,
Scale
existing structures , easements , and other
factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 '
B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 '
C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning
on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 '
D. Building height and area (existing and proposed)
7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION :
Date Approved
Date Denied
Date Appealed
Appeal Action
Remarks
Planning Dept.
Rev, 1-77
I
AFFIDAVIT
I, h. Dan.Le.L Daniez.eaa fon Ucr,UUA citrit. Uentwze being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me
this o2/,Aay of e•19 7 ,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing a t'Jc
d___ I. ' • "- A / / ,A_ ,,/1 ' , ',,,,,,7 ( ///'%,/ILZ'
ir'
Name of Y t a' y Public) Signature of Owner) >-
J
o — / C A 4 47 . " .
Address) Address)
1
IU/ ,,,, 1
4/924-t? 1( //(1.4a
City' State)
7":5-, -7. ,-7111,„„
m„,,,„
00,
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found tcr' ough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the ru dsii Ob tions of the Renton Planning Department
governing the fi let O
ication .
Z
Date Received FEB 22 9 By:
o
y. --
2,y/
N DEWGEP Renton Planning Dept .
2-73
ir ..
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 16-f R E4,
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM alp 92
FEB 22 1979
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 92 441/
Applicatior No. 5c1?3/q 4G Dt
Environmental Checklist No. 17 73
PROPOSED, Cate: FINAL , date:
0 Declaration of Significance Ei Declaration of Significance
0 Declaration of Non-Significance o Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS :
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to th. answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent ,-1,Le_ Cnlz_a2z tion. Pnh 'nntnn 1.7or irnJ rinin-t ITonti4he
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
Suite 403-1 155 ILE_ 100,th Sprpot, n JJ ', Mn4h 921.5
Te.L. 522-8 586
3. Date Checklist submitted Te,lvutc z.v. 19. P979
4. Agency requiring Checklist 2enton %',lane n.g
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
anfan. lec(i_cat Cen-tcl.:;
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
7 nos o r}. .i n r rn.!r ro n .f h o r n n
4-44«r tt o— t.4.4 4-4Q-4 6F,---
rdrnnrl Pam m._orl irpJ n 'Dip hi,aa. nn„ }_akQ11„nq 5n, ?01) 4/7ua/e /f?'?
rtri h hPan hsl pcuuI Jnq
2-
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal ) :
The conattuc ti on 4i.te conLp.v4e4 5.483 ache4 -Located wea-t 04
Ta..Uro.t Road and South o 37-th. Stiteet in the c a tty o.f Renton,.
The .e tincj 4.4 on. a 4toa ncy .tto with. ext4 Lna ,z.e4-rrdenti,a,L
to .the noir th and a ho4n4.t z.L 4tte to the aowth. The we4 te-tn
44-de Li .Go4den.ed ba(yy, an covacuituitat f.La tLand.
8. Estimated date for completion of tile proposal :
D ecem lren 1980
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local --including rezones) :
Renton City .Gwi.Ld.i;n¢ 12eiun i t and 4-i to aapit.o vat.
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain:
The pito.ec t taLL be con tuc ted -t.n. .two phone
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal ? If yes , explain:
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
See C.L Renton appitca Lion Pit 'Ate ap.Nto vat
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?X
YES MAYBE KU—
b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil ?X
YES MAYBE NO
E:xcaua Lon and cf./Ladino/ ion paitk u4
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
Y!— MAYBE la
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
YES MAYBE A
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site? X
Yt MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
VT MAYBE au-
Explanation:
E xcauaaLti.on and if P1 t[ in_lg.i1.L G PPt 1%L pQJtk.ULf
0 11111
3-
2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? X.
VES MAYBE NO
b) The creation of objectionable odors? yy
VT MAYBE NO'
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either locally or
regionally? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X
YET' MAYBE NO
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X
TES MAYBE NO
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? C
YES MAYBE NO
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body? yy
YES MAYBE NO(
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
YET— MAYBE U—
M Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria,
or other substances into the ground waters?
ES MAYBE NO`
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies?
YES MAYBE NO'
Explanation:
Pcaki,n.ry Wtea4 10,1.1 L he pored and rvateti conduc ted thvtough .tivurt
4 egret,
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees , shrubs, grass , crops ,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
yrs.— MAYBE NO'
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
VET MAYBE N
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing Xspecies?
YES RUNE' O
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X
Vt MAYBE NO—
Explanation:
11111 4-4
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)?
YES MAYBE
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? X
YES Wit' NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna?
vrc MAY 6 X,
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
Y RAYECE 44
Explanation:
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? y
YES MAYBE Nff-
Explanation:
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?
YET— MAYBE W
Explanation:
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area? X
YTS— M a
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? y
YES M YBE MO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area?
Yam- MAYBE N
Explanation:
41„.
5-
41111
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
YES M-TYFir NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand
for new parking?
YES MBE NO
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X
Y€T- RATITE WU-
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
YE MAYBE NO
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X
Yt MAYBE NO
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
YES MAYBE 4-
Explanation:
The m ed is at a4 f ice4 aj i.l,L a tt za c t .orne new veh.c.wLa t,
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
a) Fire protection?
YES MAYBE N
b) Police protection? X
YES RATTE NO
c) Schools?X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
YES MAYBE- NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy?
YES MAYBE N
Explanation:
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Communications systems? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Water?
YES MAYBE NO
4100
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
YES Wail" NO`
e) Storm water drainage? X
Y
f) Solid waste and disposal?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? X
Yam— MAYBE NU—
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view? X
YES M- 1B NO
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?X
Yam- RWTNE WO--
Explanation:
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building? X
YES MAYBE Np--
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Cam' e ConponatLon .f.on Renton.
Proponent: go,L..t Upniabtp_
sign
nam d
Cfur.LLe4 e
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
Qilege airPOra he.
Suite 403-4 • Northgate Executive Centre • 155 Northeast 100th • Seattle,Washington 98125 • (206) 522-8586
T e lvtuaA4 10. 1979
pF IRFycut'. 4 ; en ton
rrC1`J CQPtanninrttDeryale:
200 724,,LL ;venue. So. FEB 22 197&
enton., Lja4htng.ton d --------
98 055 qti
tt^_nti.on CLetlen-
e: r4oco4ed . .edi.caL Build ng
T L&o t. :;oarf., ; en}on, :'a4h.
Deal .h. C-Lezen,,
Thank you. .f.o4 yowl ,.er.Lr 4 7anua44 4, 1 c79.
e h.w.re Roca coa,2Le ed awl Atet ina44 ;. Lan 4hour ng. -the
th.- eroded use a; the iz.e7tatainc, p o-ti Lon o;L Lot 4. s l p Lcut
4hoL Lni' exi4tta¢ con tcm4 o th44 Ae.'La -n g !3o-ttt.on i4
a-Uached. Uuot pito-04a,L would be to con tact 'u i.Ld in.q
a4 /hown on out ,vtmen t 44 to p Lan, at th.iA ,tune and to
gdtade the -1..to a cco'tcUiw Lj-.
S uJ ec.t -to the 4nanctat uLa,G-iL t4, rl, ,,road them
cort4tA.wct Baiidtnq B a4 rh .-oe tiro o:? the rtta-j c t at the
Location 4hoc,;R on -the attacked . U.e p,L an ihotr-Lrt pha-e two
daueLonncn t. E.xca.ua t-i..on. pz.on, Buit6i.nr7. tyro would he used
a... a Pl,1.L .to ctea to Bwi,Ld i,nta B a4 .shown on the
rha4e two piitl,(rta p/tor.o4at.
Builders • Engineers • Management Contractors • Mortgage Financing
Pace Two- Renton Lied-LcaL Fi•Ldc
r
PLea4e note that the da4hed Line 4hourn. on the a.i to
plan, way .hown to ed:ta -U.4h the iim i t4 o.4 the phzz e. one
con4th ction and was not intended to -L v Lc. that -i t wo uJ..d
become a new -LecaL bounda/u4. The Line wa4 4h.oun to a i4-L. .t
in, de-teAm Lrz nq the fish4 con4tAuction wLth rte4aec t to
Lo ca t-i n q erizt-Ertg. tt ee4. The p o no4 ed deve.Lo n..rcen-t w-i.LL
be con4t.tuc ted o4 a a.a t,a o 1,ice hu4i.dina and wLLL not
4equi/r e a Puhth.eit pLat o 1° tot 4.
3 attach a corn.,n..Le-ted env-vtonrzen taL checks i st. LJouLd
you k..thc y. -Let me know on what ba4t4 the te.L ag. fee -e,o
determined.
in, apr.).Lic -::-Lon Pon 4ite aanitouaL - attachPrl. PLea4e
aL4an.c e a heattaq date. Stead Pnut th to ugh -ten, wilt be
4a,lrat ed 4horr t.L4.. R taad4caue plan — pite4eatt4 beinq
comp-Leted and ijou have n (lade/F.-taking. that ad.L mateA i a•L
beLn.a. plte.,n.„ ed wiLL be au brined p Loit to .the date o the
A ..e app./tot/at. heatiag.
3 attach owl. cheque in the azo unt o.f two fulnd-ted been.
doLLc 74 be m 130.00 ¢'_o4.. the 4ite w n n.o uaL f.2L n c .f.ee and
85.00 .ion -the env-vtonzen taL checat4t Ateu.-ewv }°ee ba4e4, on
owe, eat oa-ted buitdin.q co..t o-f. 800, 000.00. /14 4ta ted eattivt
cn. .th i4 -Lette,t, we w.L L p uvawtd addl.-Um-tat .wtd i Pt the
envutonnen taL fee . .equtted.
gou4.4 uew ttuty,
c-Li ege
OF R4,1
A
o THE CITY OF RENTON
b Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH.98055
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT
235- 2550
o P
9-"
D SEP-W°
January 4 , 1979
Charles Gliege , President
Gliege Corporation
Suite 403-4
Northeate Executive Center
155 Northeast 100th
Seattle , Washington 98125
Dear Mr. Gliege :
We have completed review of your medical building proposed
to be located on the west side of Talbot Road , south of S . 37th
Street . The proposed plans generally conform to City standards
and the existing restrictive covenants . Please note the comments
indicated on the plans for specific consideration .
It should be noted that this site is one of four parcels
previously divided by Mr. Dansereau . At the time of that
approval , Mr . Dansereau indicated that a master development plan
was being considered to assure proper development of the entire
property , and to adequately address public access . Although
your proposed plans appear to suit the site , no master development
plan has been submitted to assist us in evaluating your proposal .
Secondly , it appears that a new property line is proposed to
extend across the southerly limit of your proposed development .
Inclusion of this property line will require a major plat
approval as less than five ( 5) years has expired since filing of
the previous short plat . A major plat approval will involve a
Tentative Plat ( staff review) , Preliminary Plat and Final Plat
both require Hearing Examiner and City Council review) approvals
prior to issuance of a building permit .
Finally , your subject development is located in a P-1 zoning
district which requires a Site Plan approval by the Hearing Examiner
prior to submittal of plans to the Building Division . Enclosed
Letter to Gliege Corporation
January 4 , 1979
Page 2
are appropriate forms and applications . As indicated previously ,
a master development plan for this entire parcel will greatly
assist in the approval process for the proposed use . Upon receipt
of a complete application and plans , we can schedule a public
hearing within four (4 ) weeks .
If we can be of further assistance on this matter, please feel free
to contact this office at your earliest convenience .
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y . Erick,sen ,
Planning Uirector
David R . Clemens ,
Associate Planner
GYE : DRC : sh
QI/egeCorporation
Suite 403-4 • Northgate Executive Centre • 155 Northeast 100th • Seattle, Washington 98125 • (206) 522-8586
ilou&.—re,. 27, 1978
OF
P Cann ut c. e az.t rtert t fin; f r
City. at Renton
200 (!Zi,L.L S.titee:t i !OV 29 -Q t
2 en ton :Jaah.tn g ton. t'
P8055 o2r r
G DEPP .. .
A=.ten t.i_ort. a. David C-Leaen4
2e: P4op.o4ed fl-24 i caL. Buttd i t
l) t •.A. C Leaen4,
3 attach a co r4 ci e 4.^.t.ncvuY p Lan4 root a rmed f ca 1.
bwi c1 i.n.a. gou toLL Ae ca l.L that a te4tAtct i.ve covenant cane
to owt a ttentLon 4wb4eruen- to ow. cry/Lie/I. p te&;t cnahty. n.Lan•
rj.ou aunt e4-ted, we have r,.eo'..Ler e.d. the bu:1241w on the
site w-Wt a e uLt tna. change .th. the n -tLLr 7 Ltvjou . The 4e4uL.t
vs a he-`,et acceA4 two the bcu.Ld inn w-i th the ry a r oii ed_ litW.d ivi.
unciwnv ed with the exce.n .i.o n. o.} the ba4 e:>rerr,#. Levet. yh ad i ar/
44. ,the pa. Li.rtg Lot 44 be`e4 a4 rynaded have b'e.n n(,.dneed.
T P-tji-L .L ar the 4 a n.P_ n_tLn b?h pa/Lk-Lac, 4-kat 4.
o wLd t o k i .dJ examtae the 4e4/4,4 ed n.,Lan4 and adu4.4e
u4 L sou ,Und t h.:.. accen tab-Le 40 that cue ni. h t Nt o ceed w Uh.
can 't u:c t i.on. d aIt;trtn4.
jot.ur4 ve4ty tu,Ctj,
cc ,'-L arv4 e.te cue Ph e.4 .d.=n t
Builders • Engineers • Management Contractors • Mortgage Financing
NDING.
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
25ig