Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-325B Caitvnlli+lra OF FILE FILE TITLE adoioalaAMICROFILMED OF I di 0 THE CITY OF RENTONt$ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 090 Go, CITY CLERK o9gr D SEPT„ t0 September 17 , 1979 rr. Charles Gliege President, Gliege Corporation suite 403 , 155 NE 100th Street Seattle, Wa 98125 Re: Recorded documents restrictive covenants SA 325 79 Dear Sir: Enclosed please find your copy of the document (s) recorded with King County Records and on file with the City Clerk' s Office of Renton. Very truly yours CITY OF RENTON cn rintld, Q. Delores A. Mead City Clerk DAM/db Enc ( ) 5a 3;Zs '79 2 Glieyd ,.orporation File No. SA-325-79 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Gliege Corporation is the owner of the following real property in the 03 City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Lot 4, East Valley Medical Park Short Plat as recorded under Auditor's File No. 7808151009, Records of King County. WHEREAS, the owner of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desires Vto impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present ca 7, and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove N described with respect to the use by the undersigned, his successors, heirs and assigns, rl a:. follows: os PRESERVATION OF EXISTING STREAM & RAVINE The existing stream and ravine area shall be preserved, and no construction, alteration, c:-earing or stream relocation shall occur within 100 feet of the centerline of the existing stream, subject to the possible construction of a walking and hiking trail within the ravine area. The conveyance of a five-foot easement for the public as a hiking trail is required, subject to appropriate access, surfacing and grades, through the ravine on the subject parcel. The location, design, and installation of the easement shall be subject to a)proval of the Planning and Public Works Departments, City of Renton. RESTRICTION OF USE Tie use of this parcel shall be restricted to the plans and designs approved by the decision of the Hearing Examiner contained in File No. SA-325-79, subject to minor modifications, but in no way permitting further expansion of the clinic facility beyond that approved therein. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. F.easonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne ly the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a udgment in such action. Charles W. Gliege, President Gliege Corporation l.! t-eGL I, STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING Page One of Two On this "^ day of^ // ,;, 19/2, before me personally appeared Charles W. Gliege to be known to be the President of the Gliege Corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes M therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument C for said corporation, and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said CD V corporation. co C ON Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notar Public in and 1r= State ofy'i'ngton, residing ina,Q' ). eer6eyt h wcQ„ (,(113 2- OF I o THE CITY OF RENTON Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 a CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9 o FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 P0, 9gTFO SEP1& August 14, 1979 Mr. Charles Gliege President, Gliege Corporation Suite 403, 155 N.E. 100th Street Seattle, WA 98125 RE : File No. SA-325-79; Gliege Corporation Site Approval. Dear Mr. Gliege: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to restrictive covenants as noted on the Examiner's Report of June 11, 1979, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Restrictive covenants will be fil€d by the City Clerk with King County. Sincerely, Frei J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk G1 Corporation Fi ). SA-325-79 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Gliege Corporation is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Lot 4, East Valley Medical Park Short Plat as recorded under Auditor's File No. 7808151009, Records of King County. WHEREAS, the owner of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, his successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: PRESERVATION OF EXISTING STREAM & RAVINE The existing stream and ravine area shall be preserved, and no construction, alteration, clearing or stream relocation shall occur within 100 feet of the centerline of the existing stream, subject to the possible construction of a walking and hiking trail within the ravine area. The conveyance of a five-foot easement for the public as a hiking trail is required, subject to appropriate access, surfacing and grades, through the ravine on the subject parcel. The location, design, and installation of the easement shall be subject to appr)val of the Planning and Public Works Departments, City of Renton. RESTRICTION OF USE The Ise of this parcel shall be restricted to the plans and designs approved by the deci3ion of the Hearing Examiner contained in File No. SA-325-79, subject to minor modifications, but in no way permitting further expansion of the clinic facility beyoid that approved therein. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the cove:iants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the ordiiances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. Charles W. Gliege, President Gliege Corporation STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNYY OF KING Page One of Two 1 . On this day of ,ice 19 , before me personally appeared Charles W. Gliege to be known to be the President of the Gliege Corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument for said corporation, and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above wri ten. Notar Public in and or the State of " ngton, residing in ' .t)- h g ,Lems, V&A, ( 3 2- OF 1, o THE CITY OF RENTON v f > - z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 o FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-25930, 9grEo SEPTE1." August 1, 1979 Mr. Larry Gibson 3713 Talbot Road South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Restrictive Covenants for Gliege Corporation; File No. SA-325-79. Dear Mr. Gibson: As you are aware, the declaration of restrictive covenants required as a condition of approval of the site approval request referenced above must be signed, notarized and filed with King County prior to finalization of the application. We would appreciate transmittal of the document to the office of the Hearing Examiner at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Marilyn 4/Petersen Hearing Adm. Asst. OWNERS L)T #4 EAST VALLEY MEDICAL PARK SHORT PLAT Llei=„q (2• C2--Q‘144t r/-(-0, - j''', 7, 1:„yErrolR. Alden Robert Schimp e ,._ 1_1 A00',/, - R. Ald- Janet L. Schimpf // A..A. e_Q-144*,_NO-, ,,,f David L. BA—ebile Carl E. Stracener Karen H. Burkebile / i----6 anice M. S racener y L IS( 4/ Frederick V. Burkebile J se h . Wearn Violet V. Burkebile Marrianna B. Wearn i; A. nie Danserea Irwin Schille.,r 9e2 e T . DanS'ere Babette Sc 'iller i S"--1-1(1-4.- E ene R. Ekblad. avid J. Z iga Ann B. Ekblad Joseph A. 'MCGe , A/c----:" (C- -- M. fred amm Arlen T.C. Au r 13/i' lr"-g"t 7 A ik_ Sve ranzon Linda Au fin In -Li Jo E. 7 lerson e. ye ,...." le x l.r l iD(Pi) R Vera Anderson Z ems(t;,-- -2/_, !- N01:(/ MafY Lots Newma r -1----,,,i-',--if ..,Y,..61,ty"7,---4.....2—...- ward Sc, efers Vivian Schaefers AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the ilthday of June 1979 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this day of 19 -,a . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: Gliege Corporation; SA-325-79 The minutes contain a £AAt of5 the paAti.ea oti necond) June 11, 1979 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION , APPLICANT: Gliege Corporation FILE NO. SA-325-79 LOCATION: Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests site approval for development of a 34,600 square foot medical office facility in a P-1 zone. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received on REPORT: April 19, 1979, and the addendum was subsequently received on May 22, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on April 24, 1979 at 9:40 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. David Clemens, Senior Planner, indicated that several issues regarding the proposal will require resolution to remove the proposed Declaration of Environmental Impact which would require preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposal. He recommended that the hearing be continued to May 22, 1979, to allow appropriate review of the matter. The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in the proposed continuance. The applicant indicated his concurrence. The Examiner subsequently closed the public hearing at 9:10 a.m. to be continued to May 22, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. CONTINUANCE: The hearing was opened on May 22, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. The Examiner advised receipt just prior to the hearing of a supplementary addendum to the original Planning Department report regarding the subject request although he had not yet reviewed it. He inquired if the applicant objected to continuance of the hearing for an additional oae week period to allow appropriate review by the Examiner and the applicant of the revised Planning Department recommendation. The applicant indicated his concurrence. The Examiner subsequently closed the public hearing at 9:15 a.m. to be continued to May 29, 1979 at 9: 00 a.m. CONTINUANCE: The hearing was opened on May 29, 1979 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report and the subsequent addendum, and the reports were entered into the record as Exhibits #1 and 2, respectively. David Clemens, Senior Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #3: Site Plan with staff comments Exhibit #4: Site Plan as revised Exhibit #5: Overall Site Area Plan with staff comments Exhibit #6: Building Elevations (2 sheets) Mr. Clemens ,advised that the request had been reduced by the applicant to propose development 3f a 35,000 square foot medical office facility and eliminate Phase II from the request. Responding to a reference made by Mr. Clemens during review of Exhibit #1, SA-325-79 Page Two the Examiner inquired regarding existing restrictive covenants running with the subject property. Mr. Clemens advised that covenants were required by the Planning Commission during the rezone process, signed in July of 1975, and include requirements for preservation of the existing ravine and creek, preservation of existing vegetation, provision of landscape buffers along S. 37th Street and Talbot Road South, provision of building setbacks along the north and east property lines, restriction of building height, and limitation of access to Talbot Road South only. Mr. Clemens advised that upon review of Exhibit #4, it was determined that the existing stream meanders in an odd configuration and protrudes into the greenbelt setback area in two locations. He recommended that the proposed boundary of construction in this area constitute the limit of the proposed development area, but the two locations in which the stream approaches development within the 100-foot limit contain transitional landscaping. Mr. Clemens reviewed provisions of the restrictive covenants and indicated that all conditions have been met by the applicant including building height, limited access to Talbot Road South, building setbacks, landscaping and preservation of the existing ravine and creek. He noted that review of an exception by the Examiner will be required at a later date to review the proposed access road of South 38th Street, proposed to be a public street, and plans indicate a 28-foot curb to curb width, a 14-foot entry lane, 10-foot median island and two 10-foot exit lanes adjacent to Talbot Road South, five-foot sidewalks and a 45-foot curb radius at the westerly cul-de-sac bulb to meet requirements of the Fire Department. Mr. Clemens indicated that if the application is approved, specific plans for the roadway including methods to retain natural character of the area woul be required. He also noted that provision of the cul-de-sac turnaround appears to be a problem which will require review at the time the street design is known and will invo ve revisions to the southeast corner of the site and possibly elimination of 8-10 parking spaces. The Examiner inquired regarding proposed access to the parking area in view of severe elevation differences between proposed building location and western portion of the property. Mr. Clemens advised that traffic will enter on S. 38th Street and progress around the building to one of three parking bay areas at the westerly end of the site. He indicated that elevation differences within the 200-foot distance are approximately 10 feet or a five percent slope in parking lot grade, and a series of steps and walkways would provide access to the parking area at the extreme westerly end of the building. The Examiner inquired if the department recommended provision of landscaping for the existing residence on the site, currently being utilized for medical facilities, if conversion to single family use occurs. Mr. Clemens advised that final plans for parking and landscaping are being prepared by the owner, and he noted that previous approval of a special permit to utilize the building was conditioned upon inclusion of those provisions. The Examiner referenced Engineering Division comments attached to Exhibit #1 which refer to alI petition by owners of Lots 1, 2 and 3 for vacation of the access road leaving access to Lbt 4 in question, and requested clarification of the comment. Mr. Clemens indicated that the request is for vacation of the public street right-of-way of S. 38th Street from Talbot Road South. The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibits #1 and 2. Responding was: Charles Gliege President, Gliege Corporation Suite 403, 155 N.E. 100th Street Seattle, WA 98125 Mr. Gliege indicated full concurrence in the report. He advised the existence of unique and restrictive conditions surrounding the application requiring many meetings and input from various staff members, and he expressed his appreciation to those staff representatives involved in the negotiations. The Examiner noted that because specific landscaping plans and other drawings have not been submitted and because of the uncertainty of action regarding the proposed exception to the ordinance for S. 38th Street, the site approval hearing may be premature. Mr. Gliege advised that two to three times the normal amount of detailed plans had been prepared for the ubject application, he felt that the process was at an advanced stage to prepare cons ruction drawings for buildings and service of the site. He indicated that landscaping drawings have been provided which will require only minor amendments since it designates maximum landscaping for a 50,000 square foot building. He advised that survey of the greenbelt area and existing stream had occurred very recently which completed the research necessary for the project. iiiiiti.#,.,.Yvr.tii ..s._4.-.F..iJ....M1-...-P.iw1n:a4iL'.::#3tv.:e,..:r.Aarl.d',.:.; .:.,_,a—*... R': :.-' .a • .. .. r SA-325-79 Page Three Referring to the Examiner's concern regarding the proposed exception request for S. 38th Street, Mr. Clemens advised that development can proceed regardless of whether the exception is granted or not because actual provision of the street will be mandatory, and only the final configuration will be determined by the Examiner. He also indicated that a landscape plan had been submitted designating the general landscaping scheme and style on the northern portion of the property, and although the Planning Department had not yet reviewed it due to anticipated submission of revised drawings, the plan indicates the applicant's good intention and conforms to the proposal set forth. The Examiner inquired if the proposed 100-foot setback is a horizontal distance from the centerline of the stream. Mr. Clemens indicated the Planning Department recommendation to revise the recommended setback at the two points where the stream protrudes into the setback to allow actual construction within the 100-foot distance but require provision of heavier landscaping. The Examiner inquired if public access is planned to the greenbelt or ravine area. Mr. Clemens noted that although no proposal currently exists, the feasibility for access may exist at some future date through agreement between the applicant and the city. The Examiner inquired if the subject site covers the entire ravine containing a 100-foot setback on both sides. Mr. Clemens indicated that the ravine exists on the entire site with the exception of one portion. The Examiner inquired if plans exist for a Phase II second building. Mr. Clemens advised that no plans exist and the intent of revision to the restrictive covenants would disallow a future Phase II building. The Examiner inquired if the covenants can be revised without input from those who are guaranteed rights under the conditions of the covenant which may exist beyond the scope of the city. Mr. Gliege advised that all conditions have been met and no problem will exist in compliance. The Examiner requested testimony in support of the application. Responding was: Larry R. Gibson 3713 Talbot Road South Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Gibson, owner of the property containing the existing residence easterly of the site, indicated his opinion that the proposed development will be an outstanding addition to the area. He advised his intention to provide maximum landscaping and coordinate both developments to provide an attractive addition to the area. The Examiner noted that Exhibit #1 reflects an estimated traffic generation figure of 4,000 vehicle trips per day. Mr. Clemens advised that the figure had been based on a proposed facility containing 50,000 square feet which would be reduced to 2200 estimated vehicle trips based upon the revised application. The Examiner indicated that the figure was high for the single access road, S. 38th Street, and inquired if it would be more appropriate to widen S. 37th Street or develop two accessways to the property. Mr. Clemens advised that prior concern by the Planning Commission that access be restricted from S. 37th Street J.n order to protect single family residential areas had required that the condition be incorporated into restrictive covenants at the time of the rezone approval. He indicated that from an environmental standpoint, a two-lane public street with a three- lane entry at Talbot Road S. could adequately accommodate an estimated 4,000 vehicle trips per day and the roadway could ultimately accommodate up to 10,000 vehicle trips per day. Mr. Gibson advised that one of the reasons he had purchased his property was due to the restriction of access to S. 37th Street and the desire to provide a buffer between the proposed use and the residential area. The Examiner stated that a traffic increase of 65% would be projected onto Talbot Road South which is not a major road. Mr. Clemens noted that a: though the number of turning movements would be substantial, a certain amount of traffic congestion at that point would be preferable to adversely affecting the single family area. Mr. Gliege indicated that traffic counts had been calculated for maximum development potential, but specific floor plans of offices reflect a total of approximately 30 medical offices and one pharmacy, and due to patient turnover ratio at 20 minute intervals, the actual volume of traffic will be approximately one-third of the estimated figure or 800-900 trips per day. The Examiner inquired if floor plans for the development are available for the record. Mr. Gliege indicated that plans are available and they were entered into the record as follows: Exhibit #7: Proposed Landscaping Plans Exhibit #8: Floor Plan of Proposed Medical Facility The Examiner requested a final recommendation from the Planning Department representative. Mr. Clemens advised that the recommendations contained in Exhibits #1 and 2 with clarifications would remain as submitted. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. 111SA-3__ 79 Page Four SA-3 5-79 was closed by the Examiner at 10:10 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDNGS: 1. The request is for approval of a site plan for a medical clinic on ±5.5 acres in 4 P-1 zone. 2. The Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental tie Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has en issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official, subject to conditions imposed by the Planning Department per Exhibit #2. 4. Flans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact cf this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. '11 existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. T e proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height r quirements of Section 4-710 of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General 0 dinances. 8. T e subject site consists of +5.5 acres much of which is covered with heavy vegetation. T ere are many evergreen and deciduous trees on the property and a restrictive covenant designates these significant trees and a large ravine on the property for preservation. 9. The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No. 1743, dated April 15, 1959. AO amendment to the Comprehensive Plan in 1974 designated the site Public and Quasi- Public. The site itself was rezoned to P-1 on July 11, 1975. On July 23, 1975, certain restrictive covenants were executed by the property owner dealing with natural features and site development. The subject parcel is the result of a short plat Short Plat 113-77) approved by the Hearing Examiner on January 31, 1978. 10. The applicant proposes constructing a medical clinic on the subject site. There has been considerable negotiation concerning the site development with the Planning Depart- ment, prime beneficiary of the restrictive covenants. The proposal has been scaled down considerably with a major emphasis on preserving the natural character of the site. The original proposal called for construction of two separate buildings. As modified, the applicant proposes to construct only one building of 34,600 square feet. There will be no Phase 2 structure. Of the approximately 5.5 acres, about 2.6 acres will be used for site development, which includes the building and parking areas and associated landscaping. T'le building is proposed to be about 40 feet in height, with an elevator tower extending below grade to permit access to the parking area which is to be located about 10 feet dlOwn slope of the structure's main level. 11. The main concern expressed by the applicant and the Planning Department, after preservation of the natural features, is the protection of the single family residential neighborhood located north of the subject site. Various protective measures were outlined. The main effort would prevent access to the clinic (other than for emergency vehicles) via S. 37th Street. Also adequate landscaping and buffering would be required along this roadway. The landscaping would include a berm no less than four feet in height and landscaped according to Planning Department recommendations per Exhibit #2. The height of the structure will also be limited so as not to impair the view or present the single family area to the north with an imposing incompatible neighbor. 12. There is an existing single family residence just to the east. This residence, part of the original parcel, is used as a private clinic subject to a special permit which rlquires it to provide its own landscaping and buffering. SA-3z -79 Page Five 13. The proposal appears to meet the requirements of the original restrictive covenants included as Attachment A) and plans call for incorporating preservation of a larger ravine area in the new covenants. Except for emergency access, users of the clinic will enter and exit via S. 38th Street from Talbot Road S. Preservation of the ravine and creek will, except for two areas, extend to 100 feet on either side of the center- line of the creek. The two exceptions are where the creek makes two sharp meanders and the Planning Department proposes heavier landscaping with natural-type vegetation in these areas. 14. There ar,: no present plans to permit public access or use of the ravine area but the Planning Department indicates such use may be possible. 15. The use of S. 38th Street for ingress and egress would require substantial improvement of the right-of-way. A vacation of this right-of-way was denied. The Planning Depart- ment recommendation for this access is development of a 28 foot curb-to-curb roadway with a 45 foot radius cul-de-sac turnaround on the west end. The east end of the roadway at Talbot Road would have provision for a 14 foot entry lane, ten foot landscaped median island, and two ten foot exit lanes. The applicant would also be required to provide five foot concrete sidewalks of meandering design and other easements for pedestrian access. The proposed right-of-way would require an Exception subject to approval by the Hearing Examiner. 16. The Planning Department estimates approximately 2,200 vehicle trips per day. The applicant indicates 900 would be a more realistic estimate. To accommodate these additional vehicle trips, the applicant has agreed to provide the necessary off- site improvements along both Talbot Road S. and the proposed S. 38th Street access. 17. The Fire Department requires a second access which can be developed along S. 37th Street at the Shattuck Ave. S. street end. This requirement, as well as the 45 foot turning radius cil-de-sac, will decrease the amount of available parking which the site plans now indicate. The applicant proposed parking for 174 automobiles while the code requires parking for only 173. The Utilities Department indicated that the area is a difficult one to service with water. They will require prior approval of both water and sewer hookups and the applicant will be subject to the standard regulations and fees. 18. Valley General Hospital is located about 1/8 mile south of the subject site. There are a number of other clinics located south and southeast of the proposed clinic. Across Talbot Road S. to the east, and to the north across S. 37th Street are single family residences. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed clinic appreas to be compatible with the Comprehensive Plan designation of this area as Public and Quasi-Public. The various plans discussed in the above Findings which are aimed at protecting the natural features and environmental ameni- ties of the ravine and creek are compatible with both the Comprehensive Plan and the covenants restricting use of this site. 2. The topographic constraints of the site are unusual and the proposed plans, subject to continuing review by the Planning Department and other affected departments, appear to effectively take this into account. The 100 foot setback from the ravine, which the applicant accepts, will only be breached in two areas and these will be heavily land- scaped. The applicant is proposing a less intense development which will lessen the impact upon both the natural features of the site and the nearby residential areas. The applicant is also proposing protective landscaping for both the ravine area of the subject site and the residential area north of S. 37th Street. 3. The applicant and the Planning Department will still have to address the issue of decreased parking caused by both the required fire access and the proposed cul-de-sac. The space required for such additional parking may be provided by any means which does not jeopardize the 100 foot buffer along the ravine or the berm required along the north property line. 4. The Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan at Page G7 indicates a potential need for walking and hiking opportunities in this area. The ravine and creek area would seem to meet some of these requirements and the Planning Department indicated that future access to the natural area of the subject site was a possibility. Therefore, the applicart should, in addition to the covenants preserving this natural area, grant a rar13t4.attx°=xr.;LL ut"x:AF<_skn 3.s ri.:a.-:.4e"s14rM _ c SA-325-79 Page Six 11 public easement within the ravine area for the development of a walking and hiking trail. The width should not be such as to create a major disturbance to the natural features of the ravine and, therefore, the easement should be five feet wide, subject to appropriate surface and grades, running the length of the subject property's portion of the ravine. The location and design of the easement shall be subject to approval of the Planning Department. 5. The Planning Department, per Exhibit #2, Recommendation 2, indicates the appropriate type of berm and landscaping which the applicant must provide to protect the residential area to the north. There was no opposition to this recommendation and, therefore, since such screening and buffering is necessary to protect the privacy and quietude of the area, it shall be required. 6. The landscaping plans submitted were tentative but indicate the general approach the applicant proposes and, therefore, with final plans subject to review and approval of the Planning Department, the landscaping will be sufficient. 7. IBecause of the expected impact of this proposal on both the proposed access via S. 38th Street and Talbot Road S. , off-site improvements by the applicant are imperative. The forecast by the Planning Department may be somewhat high as was argued by the applicant,Ibut even using the applicant's estimate, the increase would still be in the neighbor- hood of 20%. The off-site improvements were also a condition of approval of the short plat which resulted in the formation of the subject parcel and no change has occurred to cause modification of that decision. 8. There has been no application for an exception and until such time the development of S. 38th Street shall be per ordinance requirements, and the requirements of the short plat approval. DECI ION: Approval of the subject proposal subject to the following conditions: 1. Preservation of the existing stream and ravine area by the execution of restrictive covenants which shall stipulate that no construction, alteration, clearing, or stream relocation shall occur within 100 feet of the centerline of the existing stream, subject to the possible construction of a walking and hiking trail within the ravine area. 2. The conveyance of a five foot easement for the public as a hiking trail, subject to appropriate access, surfacing and grades, through the ravine on the subject parcel. The location, design, and installation of the easement shall be subject to approval pf the Planning and Public Works Departments. 3. The execution of a covenant restricting the use of this parcel to the plans and esigns approved by this decision, subject to minor modifications, but in no way ermitting further expansion of the clinic facility beyond that approved herein. 4. creen landscaping shall be provided along the north property line which landscaping hall consist of a minimum 20 foot wide landscaped area, with a minimum four foot high erm planted with evergreen trees a minimum of ten to twelve feet in height, at not 8 reater than twelve foot center to center spacing, and interspersed with an evergreen hedge of a minimum five gallon (24 to 36 inch height) at five foot center to center spacing, and ground cover. 5. Transitional plantings shall be located between the proposed parking area and the stream/ravine area subject to the approval of the Planning Department. 6. Public access shall be via a right-of-way improved to code standards along S. 38th treet unless an Exception is approved by the Hearing Examiner. Only emergency access hall be permitted via S. 37th Street. 7. All public street improvements required for this proposal and the previously approved Short plat shall be installed prior to occupancy of this building. These improvements shall include but are not necessarily limited to: al. Off-site improvements on Talbot Road S. b. Off-site improvements on S. 38th Street. c. Water, storm drainage, street lighting, traffic signing and sanitary sewers. r SA-325-79 Page Seven 8. Final Public Works Department approval of all plans for all public facilities per code requirements. 9. Fire Department approval of the emergency access via S. 37th Street which shall be designed and landscaped subject to Planning Department approval. 10. Final approval by the Planning Department of detailed landscaping, buffering and screening of the property and structure, including the installation of new parking stalls as the need may arise. 11. Installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drainage, and street paving along S. 37th Street. 12. Storm water retention/detention per code requirements. ORDERED THIS llth day of June, 1979. Fred J. Ka an V4-4.- - Land Use He ing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS llth day of June, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Charles Gleige, Suite 403, 155 N.F. 100th St. , Seattle, WA 98125 Larry R. Gibson, 3713 Talbot Rd. S. , Renton, WA 98055 A. Daniel Dansereau, 11120 N.E. 2nd St. , Bellevue, WA 98004 TRANSMI` TED THIS llth day of June, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Joan Walker, Planning Commission Chairperson Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before June 25, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner' s decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. ft ci4 ACE APAT ION OF RE SIR I(:.l I VI ('(i'/i VAN] S I'iII:I I l i I I i ,lln `) lewd r i Pope .lots I l l ei Wit i ' e Pope , his to i l e , aro I he owner., of the t o l l o0 I ng rt ,1 I property i t th(' City of Renton , (;uunt.y of King , , L.It.e () t !•JaShintlton , described JS Ioi loiS : Ih,it portion of the southea; t. quarter of SeeI for 3(1 , l ('t'inshifr ?.1 North , ramie 5 fast , W . f•l. , in hin(l County Washington : Beginning at the South quarier corner nl said ',ec. Linn 30 ; thence north along the (forth and South center I I Ile of said S I't t. I (III il) , ,1 d i c f,l tl I I, of ?S0 toot ; thence north 89°06 ' O3" east 05(1 feet to the true point of beginning ; thence north parallel to the north and south center line of said section 30 a distance of 421 . 49 feet to the westerly production of the southerly line of a tract. of land sold on tontracl. to Joseph Mame and Betty Mance , ills wife , recorded under Auditor ' s file No . 4687718 ; t hence south 84° 17' 00" east along the southerly boundary of said Manct' tract. and along the southerly boundary o f a tract of land conveyed to Joseph Fiance and hetty Nance , his wife , by deed recorded under Auditor ' s I i Ie No. 46439?6 , '113 . 77 feet. , more or less , to the wes ter l y line of the S1 r i nghcook or Litho! County Road (06t.h ) Avenue Southeast ) ; thence south O0111) 1 ?0" 1.1,'st along the westerly line of said read 521) teed, , mire or ii'ss , to the north line of a tract of land , 1 onvoyed to Ivan G . Ihlhedacht and Phy 11 I .. (Inhedac ht , hip wife , by deed recorded under Auditor ' s file No, 10tth: 49; thence along the northerly line. of said iiehc'dachI tract. north 74o:39 ' 53" west 674 . 52 feet , i1:1)11' or less , to .an angle point in said northE i ly line ; thence ronI, inuing along said northerly line south 9°06 '.O3" west 105 feet to the true point of betiinning . WItLt;LAS, the owner; of said described property desire to impose the following rest.I' icl. ive covenants • running with the land .1 `, to use , $1resent and future , of the above described real property MOHI, THEREFORL, the ator•esaid owners hereby t", lal) I I '.11 , grdlit and impose rt", tI' it troll', a11(I ( (IVe1111t '. running Id11Ii the land hervinabove doserII'nJ with i' to the use by the undersigned , their tilt i (' ,i, and (15', it;i)s , as follows : MA I til AI CII I 1'; I he er i ', i i Igo r,rb i i,r and , i 1'ei, .i(.( i i i t in it ', udinral ', I .IIe , .)1(1 nil II'ut t ,, , ',o,t ! I n', 1. t'llt 1L.I tvithinn the ravine dreg I,tllr t itt i'- Ilcicl' Vi J by the Penton i' I n,I I't'I1 , I i ' •' 1' 1 I. AUIM eAPI ,1t'I A', O ) Ilelaileo lanlstape !, Ian'„ tot hiding 0.\ ISIintf vc''relat ion to remain , shaft be ,,tibi, i I Ie11 to RECEIVED and approved by the kenl.or) I'l ,)iil( ing Ueportiden . CITY OF RENTJN prior to t ul' het' tilevt' Iiiirl.n'lit on the HEARING EXAMINER MAY291979 AM PM 7rt31911011111211 )2131115,6 7 11 h ) Minimum fifteen ( IS ) toot landscape tutfers ,hall he added along South 37th Street and the existing f i f teen ( 1S ) fool huller .long IaIboI Road South ha I l be maintained I O adequa t 1' I V screen (IIi(I reduce impacts to adjacent. residentialial u',es prior to fur- ther development on I.he site . c ) Existing vegetation shall be maintained as much as possible . Existing vegetation shall be removed only by approval of the Renton Planning Department p prior to any further development or clearing on the site . SETBACKS A minimum forty (40 ) foot setback shall he maintained for all structures along the north and east property lines . HEIGHT LIMIT All buildings or structures located within one hun - dred ( IOO ) feet of the north and east property lines shall maintain a maximum height limit of two ( 2 ) stories or twenty- five ( 25 ) feet , whichever is less . ' ACCESS Access shall he limited to tolbot Road South . ( If access i % allowed to Smith 31th Street , there twenty 20 ) feet of additional right -of -way shall he dedi - cated . DEVELOPMENT f'I ANS All site developlient plans , including those of public or quasi -public institutions , ,hall he approved by the Renton Planning Commi ', 5, ion . l)OI;AT I uN these (.uverlants sha I I run with the land and December 31 , 2020 . Any violation or breach of Ih;",r I I ovonaII I,S III(V be 011I t)rl t tI Ily t'r U ,' I I I 1'rl'( I'II'I rt. ' Ili t I f. Superior Court of King t „unI ' either ne ity of t Ir r or any property Owners ,Ill tllill Ing it, Il't I I'I ' I .'FIv v,I',u ate adversely at Iectecl by said l,re,ll h . Wi 11 iarnm Stewart Pope Ellen Phi to Pope SIAll. Of WASHINCION ) COIINIV 01 KINK On this day ut 19 betide n.e per - sonally appeared and the f)er!,ulls who exet ut.0'(1 the wi t.h i ri and foregoing instrument . tiElFCys.r&c:r =eRa-uv a,eYa...ak:5".' 't:;a7,t:Q].j1`.`i.datf5'k'l;s,•-...: *.N ea4'..:.nc?'a a,:§t54is_r+iti=..iiii3taW3'ru::Y9d.'':- '56Y.;ep::.?_.P'V f. .. _k4-1 1^?,_..:.,.. and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act. and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written . Cr)kcV h1 iv\, tiGc Notary Public in and- fpr' xhe•State of Washington , re s td 0 ti) 4417 NJ s' Xy..; i:w:.:.- - .e.....a. di::swac.i-.i:yn e; .ai -± - •mot+..s .42.-,-•e: . .z m"v..`.{Y, lam_....+`....,yiridette,..i^ ' -:1• • . .. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAY 2 91979 SUPPLEMENT TO PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EIMMINER PM MAY 22 , 1979 7,819110111112111213141516 a APPLICANT : GLIEGE CORPORATION FILE NO : SA-325-79 AHIBIT NO. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST :` vEM NO. fir- a - 7`7 The applicant requests site approval for development of a 50 ,000 square foot medical office facility in a P- 1 zone , in two phases . Phase 1 will consist of a three-story building of 34 ,600 square feet to be constructed immediately . The Phase 2 will follow at a later date. B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : A. DANIEL DANSEREAU FOR VALLIS JOINT VENTURE 2 . Applicant : GLIEGE CORPORATION 3. Location : Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South . Vicinity map attached) 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : t5 . 5 acres . C . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The Planning Department staff has met with the applicant and his representatives and have concluded that subject to certain conditions that the proposed declaration of significant impact dated April 18 , 1979 , may be modified to a final declaration of non-significance . The conditions of the declaration of non-significance are listed on the revised declaration . 2 . The previous analysis , items one through five , continue to apply . 3 . The Planning staff in its review with other City departments has concluded that first the stream and ravine area must be preserved in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and cove- nants of the original rezone approval . Secondly , access to the subject site must be a public street in order to meet minimum safety standards and provide for adequate access of emergency vehicles to the site. 4 . The following recommended conditions of approval have been reviewed with the applicant , and he has 'indicated general concurrence with all conditions . D. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION : Based upon the previous analysis , and the foregoing items , recom- mend approval of this site approval application subject to : 1 . Preservation of the existing stream and ravine area shall be insured by the provision of restrictive covenants which shall stipulate that no construction , alteration , vegetation removal or stream relocation shall occur within 100 feet of the centerline of the existing stream. ( Existing covenants to be amended accordingly. ) 2 . Screen landscaping shall be provided along the north property line which shall consist of a minimum 20 foot wide landscaped area , with a minimum 4 foot height berm planted with evergreen trees a minimum of 10 to 12 feet in height, at not greater PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENT TO PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER MAY 22 , 1979 PAGE TWO than 12 foot center to center spacing , and interspersed with an evergreen hedge of a minimum 5 gallon ( 24 to 36 inch height) at 5 foot center to center spacing , and ground cover. 3 . Where required , transitional plantings shall be located between the proposed parking area and the stream/ravine area which shall emphasize native plant materials . 4 . Public street access shall be provided as follows : a . Subject to Hearing Examiner review and approval of specific detailed plans for the access public street to consist of: 1 ) 28 foot curb to curb width with no parking. 2) Adjacent to Talbot Road South , improvements shall consist of a 14 foot entry lane , 10 foot median island , and two 10 foot exit lanes . 3) 5 foot concrete sidewalks of a meandering design shall be utilized . Where required , pedestrian easements shall be granted for sidewalk locations outside of the existing right-of-way. 4) A 45 foot curb radius shall be utilized at the westerly cul -de-sac bulb in accordance with Fire Department requirements . 5 . All public street improvements required for this development and the short plat providing for creation of this lot shall be installed prior to occupancy of this building , including but not necessarily limited to : a . Off-site improvements on Talbot Road South . b. Off-site improvements on the access public street. c . Water , storm drainage, street lighting , traffic signing and sanitary sewers . 6 . Final Public Works Department approval of all plans for all public facilities and improvements in accordance with City codes and ordinances , or as varied by the Hearing Examiner per #4 above. 7 . Fire Department approval of details of access from South 37th Street to consist of 20 foot minimum width such as grasscrete" or similar paving surface compatible with the basic landscaped treatment of the berm separation adjacent to South 37th ( per #2 above) . 8. Final Planning Department approval of detailed landscaping plans , screening of rooftop equipment , and any revisions to the site plan should such revision be required by any of the foregoing conditions of approval . 9 . Installation of curbs , gutters , sidewalk, storm drainage and street paving on South 37th Street in accordance with ordinance provisions . 10. Storm water retention/detention in accordance with appropriate City codes and ordinances . I PROPOSED/FINAL I LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/ 4-SIGNIFICANCE Application No .SA-325-79 - PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-447-79 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Site approval for development of a SO,nnn sq- ft- medical office building facility in a P-1 zone in two phases. Phase 1 to consist of a 3-story building of 34,600 sq. ft. to be constructed immediately; Phase 2 at a later date. Proponent GLIEGE CORPORATION Location of Proposal Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS is x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was ma-de after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of/ environmental significance : subject to the five conditions listed on the attachment. Measure! , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/ final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Pl .j g`q/ect• Date May 22, 1979 Si gnats re i`/ City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 II PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENT TO PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER MAY 22 , "'EXHIBIT NO. 2 ITEM NO. 5 APPLICANT : GL I EGE CORPORATION RECEIVED FILE NO: SA-325-79 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER MAY 2 91979 AM PM 718,9110111112111213141516 D. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION : Based upon the previous analysis , and the foregoing items , recom- mend approval of this site approval application subject to : 1 . Preservation of the existing stream and ravine area shall be insured by the provision of restrictive covenants which shall stipulate that no construction , alteration , vegetation removal or stream relocation shall occur within 100 feet of the centerline of the existing stream. ( Existing covenants to be amended accordingly. ) 2 . Screen landscaping shall be provided along the north property line which shall consist of a minimum 20 foot wide landscaped area , with a minimum 4 foot height berm planted with evergreen trees a minimum of 10 to 12 feet in height , at not greater than 12 foot center to center spacing , and interspersed with an evergreen hedge of a minimum 5 gallon ( 24 to 36 inch height) at 5 foot center to center spacing , and ground cover. 3. Where required , transitional plantings shall be located between the proposed parking area and the stream/ravine area which shall emphasize native plant materials . 4 . Public street access shall be provided as follows : a . Subject to Hearing Examiner review and approval of specific detailed plans for the access public street to consist of: 1 ) 28 foot curb to curb width with no parking. 2) Adjacent to Talbot Road South, improvements shall consist of a 14 foot entry lane , 10 foot median island , and two 10 foot exit lanes . 3) 5 foot concrete sidewalks of a meandering design shall be utilized. Where required , pedestrian easements shall be granted for sidewalk locations outside of the existing right—of-way. 4) A 45 foot curb radius shall be utilized at the westerly cul -de-sac bulb in accordance with Fire Department requirements . 5 . All public street improvements required for this development and the short plat providing for creation of this lot shall be installed prior to occupancy of this building , including but not necessarily limited to : a . Off-site improvements on Talbot Road South. b. Off-site improvements on the access public street . c. Water , storm drainage, street lighting, traffic signing and sanitary sewers . I RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER MAY 2 91979 AM PM PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7,8,91101111121112131415,E PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER e PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 24 , 1979 APPLICANT : GLIEGE CORPORATION EXHIBIT NO, / FILE NO : SA-325-79 ITEM NO. 'fi -3z5 -71 A . SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests site approval for development of a 50 , 000 square foot medical office facility in a P-1 zone , in two phases . Phase 1 will consist of a 3-story building of 34 ,600 square feet to be constructed immediately . The Phase 2 will follow at a later date . (Site development map attached . ) B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : A . DANIEL DANSEREAU FOR VALLIS JOINT VENTURE 2 . Applicant : GLIEGE CORPORATION 3. Location :Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road Vicinity map attached ) South 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : 5 . 5 acres 6 . Access : Via S . 37th Street 7 . Existing Zoning : P-1 , Public Use 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : P- 1 , Public Use District , SR-1 , Single Family Residence ; G-9600 , General Classification District 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Public and Quasi Public 10 . Notification :The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly publised in the Record Chronicle on April 13 , 1979 and posted on three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on April 11 , 1979 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City on April 15 , 1959 , by Ordinance No . 1743 . The Comprehensive Plan in the area was studied and amended on October 22 , 1974 . The subject site was rezoned to P- 1 on July 11 , 1975 , by Ordinance No . 2944 . Certain restrictive covenants dealing with retention of the natural character of the site and ravine area , together with certain developmental requirements , were filed on July 23 , 1975 , and run with the land . The subject parcel was part of Short Plat 113-77 approved by the Hearing Examiner on January 31 , 1978 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : GLIEGE CORPORATION , FILE NO : SA-325-79 APRIL 24, 1979 PAGE TWO D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site slopes downward to the west at approxi - mately a 10% grade . 2 . Soils : A majority of the site consists of Indianola Loamy Fine Sane ( InC ) . This soil has rapid permeability ; available water capacity is moderate ; runoff is slow to medium; and erosion hazard is slight to moderate . This soil is used for timber and for urban development . The ravine area consists of Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC ) . Runoff is medium , and erosion hazard is severe . The slippage potential is moderate . This Alderwood Soil is used mostly for timber. This soil does not appear to be appropriate for urban-type development. 3 . Vegetation : The site is heavily wooded with an abundant cover of evergreen and deciduous trees . Groundcover consists principally of brambles . Restrictive covenants designate the existing significant trees and the ravine area for preservation and incorporation into the development of the site . The ravine area is to be preserved in its natural woodland- type state or enhanced with suitable native-type vegetation . 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : A small stream runs along the southerly boundary of the subject property . 6. Land Use : There is an existing single family residence located to the east of the subject site . There are existing clinics located south and southeast of the subject site . Valley General Hospital is located approximately 1 /8 mile south of the subject site . There are existing single family residences located directly north of the subject site on the north side of South 37th Street and east of the subject site on the east side of Talbot Road South . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is characterized by a mixture of single family residences and public/quasi -public uses in the form of the hospital and supportiv medical clinics . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : There is an existing 20 inch water main located along Talbot Road South and an existing Metro Sewer gravity line located along South 37th Street and Talbot Road South . Storm sewers are not available in the area . There are drainage ditches , however , and any development on the site will be subject to suitable storm water retention and oil /water separation facilities prior to out-flow from the site . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #145 operates along S . W . 43rd Street approximately 1 /4 mile south of the subject site . 4 . Schools : The subject site is not in close proximity to any existing schools , and the proposed project will not have an effect on existing school population except possible indirectly through increased employment opportunities in the area . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : GLIEGE CORPORATION , FILE NO : SA-325-79 APRIL 24, 1979 PAGE THREE 5. Recreation : The subject site is approximately one mile south of Tablot Hill Park . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-710, P-1 , Public District 2 . Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the site will disturb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff , and has an effect on noise levels in the area . However, these can be mitigated by proper development controls and procedures and adherence to the existing restrictive covenants and sound planning principals and practices . 2 . Population/Employment : The nature of the use is such that there isn ' t likely to be any significant effect on population . 3. Schools : Not Applicable . 4 . Social : Changing the use from low density , single family residential to quasi -public , medical clinic , may result in additional social interaction at the site as well as in the surrounding area . 5. Traffic : The proposed medical office facility will generate approximately 3765 additional vehicle trips per day (75 trips per 1000 square feet) between the S . 37th Street and Talbot Road South . This is a 65% traffic increase over the existing 5775 daily traffic trips on Talbot Road South in this vicinity . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended RCW 43-21C , the Planning Director has prepared a proposed declaration of environ- mental significance . Issues of traffic access , impact on the adjoining single family homes , encroachment into the ravine area , and site development master plan remain to be resolved . An EIS may be required to address these issues unless an amended application is submitted . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The applicant ' s two-phased development proposal is generally consistent with the P- 1 zoning for the subject site. However, the restrictive covenants ( copies attached) define more specific development criteria due to the unique features of the site including proximate to single family homes and natural stream/ ravine which crosses the site . The covenants were established at the time of the rezoning of the site to insure compliance with the Comprehensive Plan which clearly designates a portion of the site for preservation of the stream area for permanent greenbelt . The proposed development substantially conflicts with these covenants . A review of the records of previous actions on the subject site indicates that commitments were made by the property owner to provide for development of the site to a P. U. D. master plan approach to insure compatibility of the development to the site. The sr tted application does not provide for this approach . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : GLIEGE CORPORATION , FILE NO : SA-325-79 APRIL 24, 1979 PAGE FOUR 2 . In reviewing this proposal , a substantial number of unresolved questions have been raised related to the environmental impact of this development . These include : 1 ) Public access and improvements : a . To Talbot Road b . On-site c . Street improvements d . Total traffic generated e . Proposed street vacation 2 ) Impacts upon the existing ravine and adjoining single family uses 3 ) Site development intensity , structure types and sizes . Without substantial modification to the proposal , an EIS will be required . The staff and applicant are attempting to resolve these issues , however , a continuance is required . 3 . The Engineering Division advises that storm water retention and detention will be required and that curb , gutter , sidewalk , storm drainage and paving will be required on S . 37th Street . This division also notes that lots 1 , 2 , and 3 have petitioned for the vacation of the access road . This leaves the access to lot 4 in question . 4 . The Fire Department indicates that the project must meet fire flow requirements . Also , fire protection appliance type and number shall be installed as per the requirements of the Fire Chief along with ingress and egress and fire hydrant number . Watermains and hydrants are to be installed prior and previous to any building construction . Also , uniform fire code requirements for occupancy type and use must be met . 5 . Utilities Engineering notes that the subject site is in a location that is complex for water service . Approval , therefore , would be subject to approved water and sewer plans and payment of standard hook-up fees for water and sewer . Additional comments of other departments are attached for consideration . M . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION : Based upon the above analysis , and need for an EIS or amended application , and due to the remaining environmental issues , this public hearing must be continued indefinitely to be readvertised at such time as the issues are addressed in an EIS or modified in the application . L, 7,.'''.."?''''P.. t ,t' 9 t I\ k— - , i o c IL_E I --'111,___ __.- :. 1+/•. f I rs 1 1"--f" d_ . . , y p 11_ , ilt , 1 v fit 1 t 1 G -9600 n, i ... 1. ;71 k ,. ff L U83EcT o y] ITC ze' I S ,w3132 as 1-;) WEl QJ p..1 l 1. rti,. .,;,;,4, 4 I x 4 e is ze / lL—I as I G•97 " i _...... 2 ZONING COR wi I R- 2 i I GLIEGE CORPORATION SA-324-79 i APPLICANT GLIEGE CORPORATION TOTAL AREA ±5.5 acres PR INC I PAL ACCESS Via S, 37th Street F X I S1 I NG ZONING P-1, Public Use EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Medical Office facility in P-1 Zone COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Public and Quasi Public COMMENTS 1 ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department OPark Department O,'Police Department OPublic Works Department O 8oilding Div . Lg¢Engineering Div. (Please verify legal description ) 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his esignee ) dt #'xi6 DATE :G9 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT :41,07de, LOCATION :5f e ,T APPLICATION( S ) : 6:4 - may- 749 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING ( M_ t RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : f i REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1%,/+( , ,,, t,-,., En Approved ED Not Approved Comments or conditions : V L, 1;Zo-i--4 t-, ,2:- e.,_-/.._ _./a/c - L1 . 3) s // C ,,. r 1 j q w hie i S.-4- 7A- i S-4.c w . Cron K«.i . 79/ -, .41.k7 c- 2 ___ _ (/) ,„ . v4, /7, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : A.',/ i=/=1c L ovG iN EeN G Approved C] Not Approved Co ents or conditions : 2 2--yA2/2 c.. 63, c Date cl .....*uv.n of nirprtnr or Authorized Represent ive REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : /j "- Q Approved Not Approved //zs i ,4.= j/krec- /=-40'4_, Comments or conditions : / j,,-741,„4-3 .x4;C- in7.2io/Li fj'/'l/4A/Cg- " A rrK3G 5i'/ £ .T.17-necc O /?J fu,C //flc C/f'cc--.s' ree4r i// ", 3. ac/PGSS '471.40 £ ,eI-SS .c.r'J t-bee //>' /tx..7 /`u/--raee /7S e L;4c Cf//4£17S vt-Yc'e" -`,''t —7 Gr./9 ir2 /'1,9i5 /hvi0 /'i 1 ' -/rl''7',1' Tv At /.t.577?t€G 7 /14."/ r5 /P -4,/_) Fj"L-viur- J 7 .4,-7'C.' C_Q'.t .C7/Z eirsA fa S/ Alf -e a/--C ,eciGNU/'Z-,c-i4s."7,.I 1,./e ce_-cc-//..--i1 t.G'/, -2 v-z- G/7.0 L'Jc Signature o 0 rector or Author ' ed Representative ate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :U TiL171 i" ' Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : ort: ;N,s ,Oat Is ,a cod".PcEx pac-A- FA_ ,,,/,yr62- S%b/tc4) SK0s"c LT ro ,e.- A"le Liz+, SCw(A ALarJ i,;)Cc( ro I / Fri- Li/Aral ci- I V- /Fr i' c ti SY5,7Lr-"'- pN Cr/e26c# . 4/72/71 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :e. < >/_ Approved C] Not Approved Comments or conditions : I Sgnature-u__:.,--,,,---- --,-, a.-7,-, f Di` rector or Authorized Representative Date 1 ROUTING FC.. .tEVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL C'_._ _ KLIST FORMS TO : O Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department OPublic Works Department 8 Building Div . Engineering Div. Traffic Engineering Div . Q Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) 0 /A dilian , ezolopi., SUBJECT : Review of ECF- J! 4 ; Application No . : Action Name : 4/./ 1" rl e 7ff Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : al /* A, Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :e dF1=z_E Nc6J N I- E iv_ I (' C SIGNIFICANT KNON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Y/2/77 Signature of Dir ector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :-- cc.2 -4. SIGNIFICANT u ,K NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized-T ep esentati a ate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : AM.,' -/ SIGNIFICANT 41 NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Lon(1i:N.wiUN7n-L__ Co.40,0v7 Oily 0( 'l .} - 1 ., Ar 1 41-/ 7 y Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da e r ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department OPublic Works Department 8 Building Div . Engineering Div . OTraffic Engineering Div . C / CYUtilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) oMan /e et0la fi fe 7 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 4! 1 7 ; Application No . : l 7 Action Name : 4zioe...-- _ v a/ ,th/zlf Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : N Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 27/ c- SIGNIFICANT IaliON SIGNIFICANT Comments : 2 7/3C-J/7 C/ Signature f Director or Author zed Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 'O. 0 SIGNIFICANT PION SIGNIFICANT Comments : 7 Z_[_ ' /' (- r_— _:--'-yam-- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1 PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANL_. NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SA-325-79 p PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-447-79 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Site approval for development of a 50,000 sq. ft. medical office bldg. facility in a P-1 zone in two phases. Phase 1 to consist of a 3-story building of 34,600 sq. ft. to be constructed immediately; Phase 2 at a later date. Proponent GLIEGE CORPORATION Location of Proposal Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON, PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to ® have not hav a il si nificant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS Ui is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : A substantial number of unresolved questions have been raised related to the environmental impact of this development. These include: (1) Public access and improvements: a. to Talbot Road, b. Un-site, c. Street improvements, d. total trattic generated, e. proposed street vacation; (2) Impacts upon the existing ravine and adjoining single family uses; 3) site development intensity, structure types and sizes. Without subtantial modificatic to the proposal , and EIS will be required. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title PLANNI ';API ' OR Date April 18. 1979 Signature / f City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 vvi 44 -x4g ar-e: DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE CO'JLNANTS WHEREAS, Wi 1 l iam Stewart. Pope and E I ler; White Pope , his wife , are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington , described as follows : That portion of the southeast quarter of Section 30 , Ct' township 23 North , range 5 Last , W . M. , in King County Washington : Beginning at the south quarter corner of said section 30 ; thence north along the north C) and south center line crf said section 30 , a distance I- of 250 feet ; thence north 89°06 ' 03" east 950 feet to the true point of beginning ; thence north parallel to the north and south centerline of said section 30 a distance of 421 . 49 feet to the westerly production of the southerly line of a tract of land sold on contract to Joseph Mance and Betty Mance , his wife , recorded under Auditor ' s file No . 4687718 ; thence South 84° 17 ' 00" east along the southerly boundary of said Mance Tract and along the southerly boundary of a tract of land conveyed to Joseph Mance and Betty Mance , his wife , by deed recorded under Auditor ' s file No . 4643926 , 213 . 77 feet , more or less , to the westerly line of the Springbrook or Talbot County Road (96th ) Avenue Southeast ) ; thence south '6°00 ' 20" west along the westerly line of said road 520 feet , More or less , to the north line of a tract of land , ' conveyed to Ivan G. tlnhedacht and Phyllis Unbedac.ht. , his wife , by deed recorded under Auditor ' s file No., 4696849; thence along the northerly line of said ' IInhedacht. Tract north 74°39 ' 53" west 674 . 52 feet , more or less , to an angle point. in said northerly line ; thence continuing along said northerly line south R9°06 ' 03" west 105 feet to the true point of beginning . WHEREAS, the owners of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the above described real property MOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby est.anl isn , grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land herei nabove described with re , per t. to the use by the undersigned , their sucue',sor', , hei rs , dnd assigns , as follows : NA1t1I.'AL AI,'LAS I he existing ravine and 1. ree'I. ,hat l I hy prest'rvy(I in it.s natural sI.al.e , and no slructnres shall be ailst.rllc. te(I within the ravine area unless other- wise approved by the PourIon Planning Popartoent. . LANDSCAPE ATLAS 1 ) Detailed lands(dpe plans , including existing vegetation to remain , sha i I be submitted to RECEIVED and approved by the Renton Planning Departrlent CITY OF RENION prior to further doveloohlerlt on the site . HEARING EXAMIN_R MAY 2 91979 AM PM 718,9110,11,E21112131 4,5,6 4 l b ) Minimum fifteen ( 15 ) foot landscape buffers shall be added along South 37th Street and the existing fifteen ( 15 ) fool buffer along Talbot Road South shall be maintained • to adequately screen and reduce impacts to adjacent residential uses prior to fur- ther development on the site . c ) Existing vegetation shall be maintained as much as possible . Existing vegetation shall be removed only by approval of the Renton Planning Department 0 prior to any further development or clearing on C71 the site . LA r SETBACKS A minimum forty (40 ) foot setback shall he maintained for all structures along the north and east property lines . HEIGHT LIMIT All buildings or structures located within one hun- dred ( 100 ) feet of the north and east property lines Oall maintain a maximum height limit of two ( 2 ) stories or twenty- five (25 ) feet , whichever is less . ACCESS Access shall be limited to Talbot Road South . ( If access is allowed to South 37th Street , then twenty 20 ) feet: of additional right-of-way shall be dedi - cated. DEVELOPMENT PLANS All Site development plans , including those of pubblic or quasi -public institutions , shall be approved by the Renton Planning Commission . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on tecember 31 , 2020 . Any violation or breach of these rer, tric. t ive covenants may be enforced by pro; or lend ] pruceclrrrw; in the Superior Court of King County by e i t her the ( i t y of I:eritori or any property owners adjoining .,ubtec t piol,erI.y who dre adversely affected by said breath . William Stewart Pope Ellen White Pope STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING On this day of 19 before me per- sonally appeared and the persons who executed the within and foreuoing instrument . 4 and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and a'fixed my official seal the day and year first above written . kSdM `'! J v. Notary Public in and` fpr' jhe • Sa'te of Washington , restd ' + 1C;r411 U") O -14 WJ1V' PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 24 , 1979 APPLICANT : GLIEGE CORPORATION FILE NO : SA-325-79 A . SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests site approval for development of a 50 , 000 square foot medical office facility in a P-1 zone , in two phases . Phase 1 will consist of a 3-story building of 34 , 600 square feet to be constructed immediately . The Phase 2 will follow at a later date . (Site development map attached . ) B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : A . DANIEL DANSEREAU FOR VALLIS JOINT VENTURE 2 . Applicant : GLIEGE CORPORATION 3 . Location :Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road Vicinity map attached ) South 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property :5 . 5 acres 6 . Access : Via S . 37th Street 7 . Existing Zoning : P-1 , Public Use 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : P- 1 , Public Use District , SR-1 , Single Family Residence ; G-9600 , General Classification District 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Public and Quasi Public 10 . Notification :The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly publised in the Record Chronicle on April 13 , 1979 and posted on three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on April 11 , 1979 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City on April 15 , 1959 , by Ordinance No . 1743 . The Comprehensive Plan in the area was studied and amended on October 22 , 1974 . The subject site was rezoned to P-1 on July 11 , 1975 , by Ordinance No . 2944 . Certain restrictive covenants dealing with retention of the natural character of the site and ravine area , together with certain developmental requirements , were filed on July 23 , 1975 , and run with the land . The subject parcel was part of Short Plat 113-77 approved by the Hearing Examiner on January 31 , 1978. LANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : GLIEGE CORPORATION , FILE NO : SA-325-79 APRIL 24 , 1979 PAGE TWO D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site slopes downward to the west at approxi - mately a 10% grade . 2 . Soils : A majority of the site consists of Indianola Loamy Fine Sane ( InC ) . This soil has rapid permeability ; available water capacity is moderate; runoff is slow to medium; and erosion hazard is slight to moderate . This soil is used for timber and for urban development . The ravine area consists of Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC ) , Runoff is medium, and erosion hazard is severe . The slippage potential is moderate . This Alderwood Soil is used mostly for timber . This soil does not appear to be appropriate for urban-type development . 3 . Vegetation : The site is heavily wooded with an abundant cover of evergreen and deciduous trees , Groundcover consists principally of brambles . Restrictive covenants designate the existing significant trees and the ravine area for preservation and incorporation into the development of the site . The ravine area is to be preserved in its natural woodland- type state or enhanced with suitable native-type vegetation . 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : A small stream runs along the southerly boundary of the subject property . 6. Land Use : There is an existing single family residence located to the east of the subject site . There are existing clinics located south and southeast of the subject site . Valley General Hospital is located approximately 1 /8 mile south of the subject site . There are existing single family residences located directly north of the subject site on the north side of South 37th Street and east of the subject site on the east side of Talbot Road South . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is characterized by a mixture of single family residences and public/quasi -public uses in the form of the hospital and supportiv medical clinics . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : There is an existing 20 inch water main located along Talbot Road South and an existing Metro Sewer gravity line located along South 37th Street and Talbot Road South . Storm sewers are not available in the area . There are drainage ditches , however , and any development on the site will be subject to suitable storm water retention and oil /water separation facilities prior to out-flow from the site . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit: Metro Transit Route #145 operates along S . W . 43rd Street approximately 1 /4 mile south of the subject site . 4 . Schools : The subject site is not in close proximity to any existing schools , and the proposed project will not have an effect on existing school population except possible indirectly through increased employment opportunities in the area . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : GLIEGE CORPORATION , FILE NO : SA-325-79 APRIL 24 , 1979 PAGE THREE 5 . Recreation : The subject site is approximately one mile south of Tablot Hill Park . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-710 , P-1 , Public District 2 . Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the site will disturb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff , and has an effect on noise levels in the area . However, these can be mitigated by proper development controls and procedures and adherence to the existing restrictive covenants and sound planning principals and practices . 2 . Population/Employment : The nature of the use is such that there isn ' t likely to be any significant effect on population . 3. Schools : Not Applicable . 4 . Social : Changing the use from low density , single family residential to quasi -public , medical clinic , may result in additional social interaction at the site as well as in the surrounding area . 5. Traffic : The proposed medical office facility will generate approximately 3765 additional vehicle trips per day ( 75 trips per 1000 square feet ) between the S . 37th Street and Talbot Road South . This is a 65% traffic increase over the existing 5775 daily traffic trips on Talbot Road South in this vicinity . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended RCW 43-21C , the Planning Director has prepared a proposed declaration of environ- mental significance . Issues of traffic access , impact on the adjoining single family homes , encroachment into the ravine area , and site development master plan remain to be resolved . An EIS may he required to address these issues unless an amended application is submitted . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The applicant ' s two-phased development proposal is generally consistent with the P-1 zoning for the subject site. However, the restrictive covenants ( copies attached) define more specific development criteria due to the unique features of the site including proximate to single family homes and natural stream/ ravine which crosses the site . The covenants were established at the time of the rezoning of the site to insure compliance with the Comprehensive Plan which clearly designates a portion of the site for preservation of the stream area for permanent greenbelt . The proposed development substantially conflicts with these covenants . A review of the records of previous actions on the subject site indicates that commitments were made by the property owner to provide for development of the site to a P. U . D. master plan approach to insure compatibility of the development to the site. The submitted application does not provide for this approach . PILANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : GLIEGE CORPORATION , FILE NO : SA-325-79 APRIL 24 , 1979 PAGE FOUR 2 . In reviewing this proposal , a substantial number of unresolved questions have been raised related to the environmental impact of this development. These include : 1 ) Public access and improvements : a . To Talbot Road b . On-site c . Street improvements d . Total traffic generated e. Proposed street vacation 2 ) Impacts upon the existing ravine and adjoining single family uses 3 ) Site development intensity , structure types and sizes . Without substantial modification to the proposal , an EIS will be required . The staff and applicant are attempting to resolve these issues , however , a continuance is required . 3 . The Engineering Division advises that storm water retention and detention will be required and that curb , gutter , sidewalk , storm drainage and paving will be required on S . 37th Street . This division also notes that lots 1 , 2 , and 3 have petitioned for the vacation of the access road . This leaves the access to lot 4 in question . 4 . The Fire Department indicates that the project must meet fire flow requirements . Also , fire protection appliance type and number shall be installed as per the requirements of the Fire Chief along with ingress and egress and fire hydrant number . Watermains and hydrants are to be installed prior and previous to any building construction . Also , uniform fire code requirements for occupancy type and use must be met . 5 . Utilities Engineering notes that the subject site is in a location that is complex for water service . Approval , therefore , would be subject to approved water and sewer plans and payment of standard hook-up fees for water and sewer . Additional comments of other departments are attached for consideration . M . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION : Based upon the above analysis , and need for an EIS or amended application , and due to the remaining environmental issues , this public hearing must be continued indefinitely to be readvertised at such time as the issues are addressed in an EIS or modified in the application . fir;I 1 Vr Y \ } 4 le .ist'c''". r: 1 -.S. iljlk . ;"1, 1 _ en fm0199.91•91~9/119 • zI 11 i.ia, 422_ , f I I I r r SR-1r1 1 g , • 31. / .., i i It 7.•4 ., l W I i7VV\V` SIR +•, V I s.`L l SITEir i W Il 29 30 31 32 33 w n a 1 = .i m.T •1 i '1 9..; n " O O/ 11 I 2' 1.. 7 a 2, 1.17 3.r+ _...(.. y..'''}r...1.T L-I 1 ._ Ot-3 ZONING COR i pi, GLIEGE CORPORATION SA-324-79 APPL I CANT GLIEGE CORPORATIQN TOTAL AREA ±5.5 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via S. 37th Street E X I S1 I NG ZONING P-1, Public Use EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Medical Office facility in P-1 Zone COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Public and Quasi Public COMMENTS i ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department OPark Department Oolice Department Public Works Department O ilding Div . Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his esign)) Wai6 DATE : % PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT :41/1/169LOCATION :sf e l APPLICATION( S ) : 6A _ 79 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING M RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : EJ Approved 0 Not Approved Comments or conditions : J i i 1"-/- 7_,f j 1 zJ//'///k-_ t T. , i 4 Mature of Director or Authorized Representat(ve Dite REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1 /- ric l_ d , it,,_ -- /n, (, Approved 0 Not Approved Corrlments or conditions : zi,,,, ,L, , , „ ,s---- Y' 0,V,...1 2., 2 , Sianature of Director or Authorized Represent ive Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : in C- d Approved Not Approved ,,,e,5i ,r-ff-c7 i/ ,-<-4,'4.. Comments or conditions : 4,,j,.-74.-„, . /,rG- oz ,- -7-/o/,, 4, /.04//..vCG iYr /I,u7 .iler/r.-3G/C Sri/ - L 7A-4f`i-ll.« 's lure /mac Cif"c7-71 fee-('u// ".`7j?j. -i'-c SS -4-.1-40 -‘ -C`.S .4.-4 /'J ,i i 7/Y/)/2,fx. i/Lu/--u 1C /I S it- i' f; ' c iliel S xc Cki c -7. Gt-i3 e_ rr/9-.4 5 /FA/ r- r/5'/%AiA, 7 f 7 L /Av.S7 4G /,.Bare is 1 ) !'y-t.,c.. .} - Y /34 VC: C '•cS"712Kc7,s,i cyt,57 AfGe.- "1 f C ie-66;u/JZG flGti IJ /-..,l l:,,r,-.t-A-c"'/i-z G!-A- -, s.,JG= gnature o D rector or uthor ' a Representat ve ate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : LUCK `'I I),Pr C] Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : iiiiiiialIPPrfil(ASLid4Ct (f,,, gyp, ; i ) L c L i t6.)C ::i rL /i..4 A'' 'aci.':%2 L,,, , ,,,, i I i l- i t 17 O-^ i ,;)r CA d.- I ( /t" `-' .. it... j r,r. 1. ,. 0 ° 41"-- /71 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :fxx . t Q Approved 0 Not Approved Comments or conditions : 1 Cir."- /1/6. ' - '4- date /Signature of 6irector or Authorized-Representative ROUTING FOR JIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHE IST FORMS TO : O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department OPublic Works Department Building Div. Engineering Div . raffle Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee )/,/ neJ tom SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 11 1-1/ ; Application No . :_4_40 Action Name : l 4 ( 7 Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :d grzc _L t$,CG I N E€ P.. 1 f\,' SIGNIFICANT INON SIGNIFICANT Comments : y//77 Signature of Director or Authorized Rep esentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : S Co ,NIFICANT ANON GNIFICANT mments : Signature of Director or Authorized. Representat e Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :_ATic.1 `i SIGNIFICANT NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : 1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da e PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANLr./NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SA-325-79 X PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No. ECF-447-79 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Site approval for development of a 50,000 sq. ft. medical office bldg. facility in a P-1 zone in two phases. Phase 1 to consist of a 3-story building of 34,600 sq. ft. to be constructed immediately; Phase 2 at a later date. Proponent GLIEGE CORPORATION Location of Proposal Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON, PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to co have not hav a si nificant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS LJ is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : A substantial number of unresolved questions have been raised related to the environmental impact of this development. These include: (1) Public access and improvements: a. to Talbot Road, b. Un-site, c. street improvements, d. total traftic generated, e. proposed street vacation; (2) Impacts upon the existing ravine and adjoining single family uses; 3) Site development intensity, structure types and sizes. Without subtantial modificatic to the proposal , and EIS will be required. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title PLANNI ( 1I6' OR Date April 18. 1979 Signature //' 00 City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 y j ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : O Finance Department 1 Fire Department.--- Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department Building Div . Engineering Div . OTraffic Engineering Div . 0-Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ) dike _e_1,&A 0/19 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 7 ; Application No . : 440119 Action Name : 44 e (d,e(!__ x/eogf0__________ a Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : i/ /'/ 29 Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 2/fC SIGNIFICANT Id'NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : 7S /3c:4 Signature Director Author zed Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Ti_ .`,) SIGNIFICANT ION SIGNIFICANT Comments : Si,gnat`ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date p p.',7 cA'Afr ,a e/ Y OF f 1 © THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 oamIL CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 35 Aoq April 19, 1979 235- 2550 gTFp SEPT ' O Mr. Larry Gibson 3713 Talbot Road South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: SA-325-79, GLIEGE CORPORATION MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING ON TALBOT ROAD SOUTH Dear Mr. Gibson: The above referenced two-phase project has been reviewed for compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, restrictive covenants, and prior commitments of Vallis Investors regarding development of this property. The proposed development as presently proposed is in conflict with each of these items. The restrictive covenants adopted with the rezoning of the property were intended to implement the significant features of the Comprehensive Plan to preserve the ravine/stream area in a fully natural state, and to protect adjoining sinole family uses from any potentially incompatible uses. The proposed development does not adequately take these restrictions into account. Further, commitments were made on the part of Vallis Investors during pre- application meetings to develop the entire property under a PUD Master Plan approach as referenced in the minutes of the initial development application November 17, 1977) and short plat (January 24, 1978) . Without the PUD approach with its provisions for phased development of the property, and assurances that the development will comply with the covenants and Comprehen- sive Plan, an environmental impact statement would be necessary to address these issues. The areas of specific concern are listed. (Note proposed Declaration of Significance. ) Major revision of the proposed development of the entire 9± acre site under a PUD approach providing for lower intensity structures, improved access, and compliance with the restrictive covenants may be satisfactory as an alternative to an EIS. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact this department. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Erickse Planning Direct. V/ak, ke %- 7 Ba id R.' lemens Associate Planner CC: Gliege Corporation Vallis Joint Venture 4. PROPOSED/FINAL D...,LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/I. .4-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SA-325-79 X) PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-447-79 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Site approval for development of a 50,000 sq. ft. medical office bldg. facility in a P-1 zone in two phases. Phase 1 to consist of a 3-story building of 34,600 sq. ft. to be constructed immediately; Phase 2 at a later date. Proponent GLIEGE CORPORATION Location of Proposal Vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON, PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to ED have ED not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS © is no is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was maTTe after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : A substantial number unresolved questions have been raised related to the environmental impact of this development. These include: (1) Public access and improvements: a. to Talbot Road, b. Un-site, c. street improvements, d. total tratt1c generated, e. proposed street vacation; (2) Impacts upon the existing ravine and adjoining single family uses; 3) Site development intensity, structure types and sizes. without subtantial modificat to the proposal , and EIS will be required. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) ' declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Ti t 1 e PLANNI I I`' OR ‘0Date April 18, 1979 Signature ier i City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 OF R.t, oivimaTHECITYOFRENTON U ti 4 ' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o . R ivi- CHARLES J. DELAURENTI I MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9.o Qom. 235- 2550 o ggTFO SEPt, B April 12 , 1979 Charles Gliege , President Gliege Corporation , for Renton Medical Joint Venture 155 N . E . 100th St . Suite 403- 1 Seattle , Washington 98125 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL IN P- 1 ZONE ; FILE NO : SA- 325-79 ; property located on west side of Talbot Road South of 37th Street , Renton . Dear Mr . Gliege : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 27 , 1979 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for April 24 , 1979 at 9 : 00 a . m Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . Al ' interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550. Very truly yours , Go -don Y . Ericksen Planning Director B y : ( 4 ,/a/' David R . C' emens , Associate Planner cc : A . Daniel Dansereau for Vallis Investors 11120 NE 2nd Street Bellevue , WA 98004 Sh , lter Enterprises Corporation 623 Ivy Avenue Coquitlam , B . C . V3J 2H8 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBL::C HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON APRIL 24 19 79 , AT 9 : 00 ;,. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . CENTRAL PUGET , INC. ; APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING IN M-P ZONE , File SA-324-79 ; property located on S . W . 7th St . , west of Hormel Company , in Earlington Industrial Park . 2 . GLIEGE CORPORATION FOR RENTON MEDICAL JOINT VENTURE ; APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS ( RENTON MEDICAL CENTER) IN P- 1ZONE , File SA-325-79 ; property located in the vicinity of 3713 Talbot Road South immediately south of South 37th Street. Legal descriptions of all applications noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTL;RESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 24 , 1979 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED April 13 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION 1 , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPItS OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , on the_llthday of April l1979 . SIGNED 2 Qilege Corporation Suite 403-4 • Northgate Executive Centre • 155 Northeast 100th • Seattle,Washington 08125 • 1206) 522-8586 Patch 23, 1979 7-6 1V P.Lann_uw Depa/z ttnen t OINEb ° The C,Lttz. o4 Renton 200 IIU LL five. South APR 2e7 1919 Renton, LYa4h. 98055 j,`NGD v U.ten .Lan IUi. Davy 2. C.1Lenen, Re: Renton ,"!edica.L Bu,i.Ld ink D4opodai. Dealt r n. GLe ten4, T t7theA -ta mut -Le:f te't of_ T e&-ttwuty. 19th,, 3 as attaching the 4ert, hint; equ i it.e.d won the 4-t to a.wp4ova.L he.aJan.r ulih n24pect -to can. przopo4ed n dLcat ceii-te,.. fattek.La,L c4 PI orlr4: 1- 4_ Ld.av%.t o.4 at:rne,t4 h- 2- Cight co p.ie 4 o.f. the plot p Lan 3- ELt ht co p Le ei o4 a uiciaity.. nao a i ,te u iite d 4- T hrtee_ co p i..e4 o . a .Lan.d4 ca?.e p-La i, it-Le-Ludt/4 ph.ai e one and two. 5- Mimee cop c,e4 o,4 ba Ud in.ga e,Leua t,Lon4 6- One copy. each 81/2" x 14"- plot t a1., tandacaping plan, e.Leva Uon4. 0o04 you pLca4e a tatt.ie a heatta% date a.4 400n ad po64thLe. Yo urr o .t WJ4, Ch air l.LA C ge. Builders • Engineers • Management Contractors • Mortgage Financing I 4' . a - ' Y' r k tit. l+ lS y' A. s ° t t a1.1i 1MI" t t t Sjt •i ,, f f rl,{ .r;4.1 5.. ;4 a-. itiJ^d 1 f,-- . fCeti ti • i1 i '-'i v , t 91 •ci t X i''; .,_, h' i t .; Ira Rr 4,- air..• t a 2•\;,,07 "...... /....-"...- ---- 0........... H . i f PARKING REQUIRED 173 CARS PROVIDED 174 CARS r•. ®,,., y. SITE AREA 113,440 S.F.F. 2.604 ACRES wl le illarlift ! t der I FINISH GRADE i— i LOT 2 t ot477 lidCt.) I elit r-, f 11MT II 7 lii Au EXISTING HOUSE 4N'',._IINRI q q 1 a Irn t i i ea- I rt/...Ir.,• Ex 4 ip . 4,___. t „..i Wir 11:-.,''' 16 . 0 ACCESS ROADWAY so f 0 N. N. REVISIONS t •-. • f day ,. i k ` r F . ,; t, M ; y'.: y !.. Cf. fit« K4; 1 :•,,..,_. + . f f iJ% t! illa^ I v . I" r Zt c*- 4-------, . 1 . . 1:,.: P.:: 4C. .... .‘.'::://..::::. e:: 11:'.....;•1'‘'..:'‘ 5;: fl::."" I'':• i'.. .:::...:..;' : 7: lb wri 01:: , . 113 CAN' 0 . kf'r I liaf. o 1' um I I 1 I i I CURS 1j I , I y i2 CARS I n r ' 1; w I lit/ miiil' I I I• ao I 0 it i.yF 0 rf I y ` r 9' A 142olc4as I C\ 3 y i I II IZC4AS/ I I 1% I I i 1 xZ 411L... 0V IOW Jy 0f 112 [ ARS I A' h i. ' ' '''' N CARS .'/' I y 4 /•//, 1•ff LIMIT s _ f o 4 4 •o.. t4-- .,;•','.'' y,- , o-i,-A,"v••• .40.•t-,'•,.k w4:•tcP'--. ...... .1.'', If', %,-.146.1.1'' '''''°' r ', • : ' 44*,?. 4.. ' i• tolgt.,:ir 4,.. 4 ; 0 r ilia ,,. , t, ,..1".41*,414• '''...,'..::' e. 11..Vt.X. '''t...'41,,:r.1'14.' ', , *il.offik 4,1 •,,,, .,,: ,*. 4 i,,,Arkt . * , ^..% • 0..44 4%.' g" .;4-tls tt: .1 , '1'•rik .' ' , I • . • ' .I S'4,'ill X.f i1 • ,,, . '.4i' '''.,'''4, . 4'••1•.:A. I. ,. .01yil,• *Wel, i. e,... . 4. .,1,1.- ,fro ;No :.-., - ;,... ••,..‘ I.,. e$,_"vv.4,4c.1vliQr, ii 1st.•,4,..si.14 '. ri, " ....0 '-..nw'r.,Nr y;.4 c4r is,,,....r.. •31 11 r., ': s, ,„,„ 44 .'10,;t:' r .F5';),..lt1 ,..x.. ,...:,.,:k; %., t4„4",„,i .. t..., ,•t.:.,...• , x.• 1 t'; .....: t s.‘'.e*i A .t V. 1:+,'5:1-.*,.%6, e;4::'.-,,,Tuaf: vr.\\ v ,44410.•ff,, , R L. - ...;;...„, lak ., • e e 1. deL4., ,• kr 6.t. 7."-fir".•••,•,........... 1 $ A.,,fki.''' VI * ',*W:tr7' f.' •1 c e,- ,. - ,.,.\,. ic•C,k. ..' IV r' i:vi,, ' t" , ' t,''''1/2-:*••i-"..V...r.7••:, ;-- N, •-".• • 1311e4f.S Ft EET4,ar,••. .. -.. , ."".....'•-•---------__„- litztc.. ---..'-' •, . ,.1 4.4•48,4.P,,,,--,,.,,,,,,.. .. ••_, PRoJecT sounorm-i•-•-•------...„.....Ak,•:.•... . tr. ... , t., r Wief C ,,, • ,,, + Ripl,..tk%le tIN:. •••' 4.6.4•4A.:• r " . 1'. r. . . 7..t."".",".'"......repop„, . v emlftp 1%V.6‘t.f. , • .. - - cm' ' " .",,,- ' • tt4 1r .I1117at 4de 'a iI ‘‘i A SPHALT ROADWAY V P • CiwAr u V 1 I I I Irli4tv. • !I; o r 44 1 1; : Si%':i' 1 1ad It.i.::‘. II Ir‘ti, 1 dey . al1siltoite15 I! V --------------- 5.sww.4Lo---T----------------.---------.-_ I 4" i_______ 1 I 7eyAZ405. :‘.:' r-"*'.........' '“'. ' •-^ -..-... ."••- t''''''-'4:. :3..". 1•61-".''.'.."'-'-' Vfr __,','-• ••....-..1....... _ '• .' ',Av..°i-- --' ...1 IA'11111111111111 tet,o.,:w. rsocix.xs..1.9A-.$, --:= :-.'•.":::".77. ''..--4,..-Is,. - :, ' C ) 17 ''.•-•-•."'. •"'4,t1:-.-11t.::--- e:-A',4......"...›.t A"c.14- -----'•^',4-=-. `4'":,- ...t. 4.......... ckr• r •...- •t- - - --. ,,, -,..., • - • e4:eee‘,...I.L,,,,cri.e.7-..- i 444^.. e->z.-ts". - 2" 122% • V. ..tiji•e4;,...4"... "• kelkiv..?..4f.N 3 P-44" f4. f '''17...-77 -74.:•"'147:::t-....,. --''''''":,',.... i• 1.4:::&; 44..7.----.1%. '?:' r I -; ..- -.-. .-- n---,---.4 ta i!:.:T I d •-•••:---:,' ^-,.,, r' ''..etk*::::?',1r,:'.3t5"1.., v--:-'-.;-- , - 1. 1"."; s -0';": -..' cl'G!`?=. -::--%-- 1ts 4),-- .... -',(1.4o0,.....-.--..-...., N. 7...zs s."...: A. 2 ' ar.. . ••••••-•°4 3,*,...'": 7.7,,,,,.,,,:,.,_:„..,-1-,.,' t4.' ''‘'..--' t'.--. i... ....,•*••• -1:‘,•,--, t..A.,,...,.. .• - ..... .„..--4-..---s -- , -.- •/.. - 1, ......; -,-,a •,k.14"--4,':S.-.-..--- ; .-,..,...4..A.; 4.,:--4.4" ,..4- •,'• 1/4 1111111E1111 g .f_, N.,,___'.•%"' 14'',*1.,414,4,'1 ., t4,t,. ..4.44-.,,,,--•••.,-..,7•_--777,-..;: •"'":7" 5-..,,,,•-4.z w,.. ,l-kw-•,-,- '- ..- . ,: , . ' vs.-'"<'-.5, n -s"--,4*-..,-;,-.....:..;,......,` 7 -, .."-;z-.41:-l'14.:-.:-•.„, 4,z4ie:t.": ig. r ., fta,A,;_,...A,,...i,.-, •-, L.. .." IA_ ,•••.,.. - • . / to. 7.-- ...VW...! -".., - -.v- -...---,..--r..4.....,:"..._ a., < 41" I• IIIII.\.,‘.: 41: 0:1; \1: 1..:;)'. .,.,,..-' 1'1: '':: i 11.'..‘:';': I."'"."'''''' -' 1.: 15111 liI 14.14 IIWla. 14.:T. L:..,:..".1'7:,''4a:'... 4111'1I'L'•..' 74%.:':.:.li::::::::.4''. 1.:' Lt"."1-t41'4: .;: As: PZ::::" l'Il'... 4"'M.- 1411':47.":.*'* 44 4-.'''. 1- 1. 1t4;°.: ... P..:::'...: : 4 i ta,...... rt •4 *1 i. 74.... N. N.. t' • • , ' iNwrillit ED N N\ 1•S F•; 3 E D BOON 7--, _ ....._...."N4E0.ef1/4, 4 1' els" 413 i, f ii Vi 1 I ' iiiiiiil P : "..: 1 r y 1 w \ t4 1 . . 4 ., , fil . r! t, iill( kiliii 4 IliiillOillii tl ' itli' t `; t. t. 4' ii, ' ; •:.! 1 0 - 1. 411[-- 8_" - - a , is ' ' 14' a 1 1. II. 4',• ; . I. • i r ' '' % ' ' t M t . p.... •• 11 1 } Myn.• a ai . NNMN 11 1 0- 7l 1 / • / J 6 r, . . v4 1 ii, 47'; er , . A., y fY - n.'.• „ o oRF1 )\ 1 I iEIiWf a i• 1 i i ...',, l'..,'..-- e 7;;; 10' 61.! 37: 14 lh e:. ... ii . 5.1: 74W '', .- 0.....,: e- T• tv-; ' 47C/ 4 . b ff 9r, h.1 R , 1 _ 0 \ 1 I i anr ti I t v t 3 G I. v. 1 4f,it . i, f. CI 1 •` did tl 1 i 0 1 . -„_ . 1. . lt, 10 io ' ip o 1 1 e ,,,, v u w. .• - t- r : 1? 1 41: 4 1 I 1 F I . I Q l Q a. a., 1 I '- 1' ' , 1 titi 1. o c. l tr; 4 P' / 4 , S r.,„,,,,,, s.,...,__,„,, , . ...,.... . ,.. • 4 1 t‘ ji-C :-: iP-) " 01i i„..........„. 11-• c, 1\ • ^ 1, 0 0 i; 4 f c6,, 1•,',.-•`, ', ,,, 7. ... •, '• '.. ''. , , 71../ Jr: N- 6- ' ' ': 1[.....-.' ''..'';: II'.'• ••'`.• 1. . ' .' .:• ' i e r ,. • • i . 1, . . , , t r., __,...: Z. . ' . • ' 3 41;› . . 7. . . , a f today.. I : t..; ..• -•... I....'-. I ^ 41...3: I I k 46: 4% '' • l' . 1 5 . . i • • . . . 4';. a • 10.. 1 , f, I . il4 i r I i . i • • 1- 7/ i g 2 ' ' II 1. I • 0 f;._,. ......' 2. 1:641, r.,k3...../..... 7............._,...1ar hi, A4* . i.4:0. • z •a - t ei 1114,/ VI. 4 14) 10, 1 ,/ 1.. 0 . . . k.. ... 2:, ..,,,.-.-.. ; . . • • . • a. — 44. .:" 14,,, le • . 0*- • ' : Ail' . . 4V .. . iv 1 a 4IC- ' i, 1,,.. I 7, 7777:- ..-- ... - : s' l • 10t3 0 7, 410, r, 711. 0j. 1 ilt 1 I 1 t '..° ...; i I ,//' % I/// I tri• . .4 7 / ., /<'"--- 4 ' 41, 10 i I 1. 1. 1t le --.. .---... t. t•: lit , X. r_ ._,!.._..,„......... 7,/ I V%.., 1 • N G 0-. 1 . 0----... i it I • .- ' ' 1 Pi.'''‘. 4. D •.___ if/ tis. f.. i, (..,;,-.•,:,-•::.:' : •••• - 11 ..„, it 1,;,!,...;;. 1,!, 41111i):::'; q.: 11 ' Asi. t. 1 st 3414, ---"•-•-•""'-' N'''''' J/. 1 : i.:/..! : '. i`' i• tr::. i t •' i!, 4 t. I / '• Li• • ‘' lig S • 4: e.$$ 1,••,- 1-.• I; Of•, /..,•;(.•,.• : 7 : 1!;!... P... . if C' t. x. ii r ' I / I. 4. I. 4', 3. ;' i:.• ri . 14,.% 4';'$ 1 ', I 4 L, I, A.. I I. 0. 1.•, i14: t . 11,..'': It,' ;• 10. 41' i 1 A . I 1 V • 1,', 41. 511 c•-• ,-• f• . 1,•: fr . i... .'. 44.14.—is 1 _ 1!).,..-••, I. f," ii.' I%:. '• I IP,. . 1, /•,,. R. rg,' , i f', a . i4.!.,;,, i V., i M: 1; 11, 1' I.:• lt,'; tit 1 . . • In, c: 1• 4: 91,/ et, i4:• i , f;'.'' s -.. i'..; I/ 1 / i s;,' '..,,••••:'. . % i lifi,.'. 1tplittj. I.' ,.• t ,• 11I. , ! • ilt'''';" . 1; - :,'- i • ' t. f.:,. 14.. f, 3,•••!••••,,,..,, i:• 41" i.. t., 11N, :,‘, i t• ..;••, '•••: ,.• .,.. — IL,. 4• ,..,. 4.. Vi;,: . s.,... 1 il Aril tii.,: lli' ;••, if:.!. lilt) 1 ‘. t•,/, ii.-,.. 1. : zr I. k, 7 d, , 0 . 11 ..- )• tt ls. i''' i 7111.., t. t. t ,•,, / / I - 4k'', / 4.;.,'.:', ., I :, 0 _.....___ 1 • , i,:!(. 1., Y, ii. 11::•.[ 4:: L. o.: v../ • / I 7 It1- 0 cat , am ft..., ; r j.: 1. ., .•. .. :. : lit."' .• ''. 4., 1---,,,. ‘--- . r. 04! 0/ tti- ag .„„. L'•'' -••' '''..: '''' , It1/.. 1.'• •• • ' '•' . 0, 1, 44? ---'''''"--• i ;' I . 1/.• . - /' .• 010 g, i 14 4 L.. 1 1 ?.. f: le I I tia woe e 1 . 1 , . , I l• ae4--• Oie. ----:- , . V ---"- frl e.? c • 1 i...: . .; ;, :• di", .. . , , • i • 4' 11 '.• . • • p,..• 4!.. t . llefts4 1..,_ I •,,,•:.. t:,. I. 4......_ I______ •1. ,... '!.. 1. • I. • I L.:....., • . i I I I 40 im. Ta.% . itlii . 1 is . • . tfr i is. 4 '• : V. 1/ 1.'' ti.,• -.------,..„ 7&_________ . 15.„‘ sfa 0: 71' I * " 7, 14t, I di f 7 te.', • A ..... H.____ Z-•• fc1 ...____..,______ . 4......_:,./.. ...........,,,,,,, Y V".4•3 I f, • ' c i LI; is......---.-...........• • • ArNs it, , . o,,, .. tli': fZsIli.t.. N".....-_. I 11, L..,,.... t': .,' • I' 6 • I . 2.' 1.-".!•.' " • 1 r?, 11j:`!..•• '` '" 111.. . . . yr r.,w'Air 1,W,(L}r 7sKtif et '' I, l, t A r' O \ r , r'w+,I"-`4'(i'-" n ' J.-j '. , - ' y• / kA - ' P. i ?, ` , ei...„. .„ A ic17•1..4 7 E.r 17m IA 1 4•I :• a is ...±#4 1701 t, / / // 14.....4 I ' • 41 / zs.t.r•-17::: 0:1, i .11i. .?'?/ TT ri_j_T_1_ 4.. 1,,77-T.7 . ' ;.( V / ,, 4.•,. vg..i i iI/ 1 I • .''CO a Ifii V ., rill q i'' —., _ r, 1 .1 / s 0A ,..v . . // cfi' t• .# 0..,.".,. \ "'Alfriiirs r jJye,t. 4, si */ ill Tff i .it:t 41.11!7,: l II 111I f,, Z.-.. 1 \ \l'i QIIiiil 1/ \:,. L.1: 1 5-- it J rI i.-.•— r... it:,,,,: ‘‘ .-itti----; I . 44:4;;;) 4' N' s' s 1----," 5:E),/ -- , ,,IN m 0 c. ti ...,.1 . ..____k :6,— 1I ,P.) 1? 1)y 4•is is , L. ' r-- _--.t. ci.._ ,p i. it,‘:::::::::.t F G 1 TIMERMflKT v 0)0 I 1.7- 2z__-_---- 7 __________ A ROOF 010 fw.., ____ _______,_„_____ ____.___ ______„____ ___..___ ______ =____ il!,,,,,i i.„ ... 1.11.., ,i_ _ f' I'''1 I L it1- - L----'- h11 _ _- --_ -- -- _ ---_ --- —_ - - 11•0.0 RCM MO MONTH EL EVAT I ON ii• - • 1_1—.1- r Fi __— _r -1r ram r- ram- G -"- - PM(ff f rEVIsro!+g i It z4S, nrri'VIVP00,:.'-.„..c7 \ L. f'c.3 s 1. . _r.+ yt,.rrF• T OMOISnu It iT i+'.r - j sr mn-swtw rAwfcror o mfe,e.f 1 1` lei 4.6_,, , I,..: f r J MEDICAL 6UILOiT:G-ELEVATIONS a........r r••-neS'1--r i '•,Z•*"'`Z-4"v'90.*11.`r`•••-,^,Prrtir`sa[^••csz-..-......". i'.I, ri.: !f;II Iii1. I: Ifl {{1il;'III i. ',' • II I I j11 !11,lllllI.I 4 I Ih„ h0 ! - - --- i 111 IIill'{li f 'yllfl i I j I. '__ __ ET _- ii, liltI • I [ Mt[A{ CAST O1Y1Tt0q lil1'iI IIIIL Lf4'II i n t rl rr l .., it t ! III I!tli i, fl' I,i, ' t'1h II1l `11!II I:r 1 I l I!fh i I M,T III I,1 I!, I ,Il li I i t1I1''y,1 ' 1'1 111111111i!,!1, 111 I,I..:,,111 1 i,, , 1 t ItI I IItIlf ' Ilry! l'lli l I 1 1,i 'li I!!Ill'If f1I 111 i 11i ;ill'II:I•! n'': _ I. !iil I l p l III 1,Iui.,l';!' ,.o.d ru I 1/! 1 1I;,1 II' ( f 11 I!,1!11;.uf t n 9111• 11. h! y"Iith l,10 1 1f i11i, {i'I;ill ;', i 01 1I ill ill 1'•,,',1i11111: i` f(,,1,1 1 f,l,IIII!r,i,l„ff ,tIi fall li I III I, , l;iIrlit111: ,f I , ill , I,'P,f 1i111 f 1, , ti;'. I IIII!,i I 11; ,th;;'`l,{;,g1 W hfi;ip I;?;i ihif;!II, ;; : ii!i,ilu;,.Ih0u1 Il fl+'1{''{,if I li fl{t' ' f I! Ill IIII;i!;'(I 111{1 h iflfl 1 t 1 I si. _, 1 IIM I774'1'I IIII P IIllj II';! f1111I f 1:'I,,IIIII I l,II I t!uu 11 1'II!II;ill III; 1 1{Uln•n I ; M q 1- :01 1 1 ' 11. li I ' b'1 1 f I,11, I!,11!I;i. , I1, .t1 s I IIII IFi.'r,,iiii.iitiliii,,,iilf'!I IfI`I `'lllfll I`;a'jihP;i i, ; I'jl!'tl!I P r15roKSr_ 1t1.,, I t ! r4li !lo 1. If!j I,,iiif I,1al;;I C'nle,till.,h 1 t= _ i—t'_' 1:1 I__ ll(ILi i= 1 ;L. I IIf1I-.;,', w.[w s C fi • V \ A-r viTov+asu COP? A M -. iJI,Pb 'Z 'A liy,.;:1 on[..os.aoarnaMs..a.as u Mer YCJICAL BUILDING-[:[NATIONS ,7 I 0 0 OF R4,4 A. w © o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 n o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. w 235- 2550 o P 917- SEPT, f,0 February 22 , 1979 Gliege Corporation 155 N . E . 100th Suite 403- 1 Seattle , Washington 98125 Gentlemen : We have received a partial application for a proposed medical center on the west side of Talbot Road South in the city of Renton . We have reviewed the submitted fees , and they appear to be in conformance with City require- ments . We do not , however , have sufficient plans to proceed with this application at this time . We have enclosed a copy of the materials required for an appli - cation . As soon as we receive the additional copies of the plans , we will be happy to proceed with the processing of your application . Very truly yours , Gor p Y . Ericksen P1 nning Dir, r 7/ /Z(V /(-- (C,Oteit,-'} i c. Vid R. Clemens Associate Planner DRC : wr Enclosures F RENT41100L0LI: )% CITY OF RENTON v APPLICATION FE8 w SITE APPROVAL FOR i(' CE USE NiNG OQ q File No. Z Filing Date 2/ Application Fee $ 3C) Receipt No .SSJ er Environmental Review Fee $ ap - APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name CLLe..cye Confona ti an, -Ica Renton. ',1e.d i.cc-L la-th t Phone 522-8586 Address Swi to 403-1 155 11,6. 100.th St. Uen tu4e. 2 . Property location Seatt.Le,igadh. Wet Side TaLbo. toad, South a.f. 37th Stiee-t, Ren-ton 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) Cot. 4 . £a,.t UcLLLeu (fed i ca L Pa.k P-La t A l'e-zo,</>6^7) c'/3e/./ c oW -c : I/7c., tie,. 4. Number of acres or square feet 5.483 Rc4e4 Present zoning P-1 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Two me cLi.ca L o/,P.i ce 1rwi.l d,Lng4 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. Rev, 1-77 I AFFIDAVIT I, h. Dan.Le.L Daniez.eaa fon Ucr,UUA citrit. Uentwze being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this o2/,Aay of e•19 7 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing a t'Jc d___ I. ' • "- A / / ,A_ ,,/1 ' , ',,,,,,7 ( ///'%,/ILZ' ir' Name of Y t a' y Public) Signature of Owner) >- J o — / C A 4 47 . " . Address) Address) 1 IU/ ,,,, 1 4/924-t? 1( //(1.4a City' State) 7":5-, -7. ,-7111,„„ m„,,,„ 00, Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found tcr' ough and complete in every particular and to conform to the ru dsii Ob tions of the Renton Planning Department governing the fi let O ication . Z Date Received FEB 22 9 By: o y. -- 2,y/ N DEWGEP Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 ir .. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 16-f R E4, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM alp 92 FEB 22 1979 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 92 441/ Applicatior No. 5c1?3/q 4G Dt Environmental Checklist No. 17 73 PROPOSED, Cate: FINAL , date: 0 Declaration of Significance Ei Declaration of Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance o Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to th. answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent ,-1,Le_ Cnlz_a2z tion. Pnh 'nntnn 1.7or irnJ rinin-t ITonti4he 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: Suite 403-1 155 ILE_ 100,th Sprpot, n JJ ', Mn4h 921.5 Te.L. 522-8 586 3. Date Checklist submitted Te,lvutc z.v. 19. P979 4. Agency requiring Checklist 2enton %',lane n.g 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: anfan. lec(i_cat Cen-tcl.:; 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : 7 nos o r}. .i n r rn.!r ro n .f h o r n n 4-44«r tt o— t.4.4 4-4Q-4 6F,--- rdrnnrl Pam m._orl irpJ n 'Dip hi,aa. nn„ }_akQ11„nq 5n, ?01) 4/7ua/e /f?'? rtri h hPan hsl pcuuI Jnq 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The conattuc ti on 4i.te conLp.v4e4 5.483 ache4 -Located wea-t 04 Ta..Uro.t Road and South o 37-th. Stiteet in the c a tty o.f Renton,. The .e tincj 4.4 on. a 4toa ncy .tto with. ext4 Lna ,z.e4-rrdenti,a,L to .the noir th and a ho4n4.t z.L 4tte to the aowth. The we4 te-tn 44-de Li .Go4den.ed ba(yy, an covacuituitat f.La tLand. 8. Estimated date for completion of tile proposal : D ecem lren 1980 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : Renton City .Gwi.Ld.i;n¢ 12eiun i t and 4-i to aapit.o vat. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: The pito.ec t taLL be con tuc ted -t.n. .two phone 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: See C.L Renton appitca Lion Pit 'Ate ap.Nto vat II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures?X YES MAYBE KU— b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ?X YES MAYBE NO E:xcaua Lon and cf./Ladino/ ion paitk u4 c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? Y!— MAYBE la d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE A e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X Yt MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X VT MAYBE au- Explanation: E xcauaaLti.on and if P1 t[ in_lg.i1.L G PPt 1%L pQJtk.ULf 0 11111 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X. VES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? yy VT MAYBE NO' c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YET' MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X TES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? C YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? yy YES MAYBE NO( e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YET— MAYBE U— M Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? ES MAYBE NO` i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO' Explanation: Pcaki,n.ry Wtea4 10,1.1 L he pored and rvateti conduc ted thvtough .tivurt 4 egret, 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs, grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? yrs.— MAYBE NO' b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? VET MAYBE N c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing Xspecies? YES RUNE' O d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X Vt MAYBE NO— Explanation: 11111 4-4 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES Wit' NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? vrc MAY 6 X, d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Y RAYECE 44 Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? y YES MAYBE Nff- Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YET— MAYBE W Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YTS— M a Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? y YES M YBE MO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Yam- MAYBE N Explanation: 41„. 5- 41111 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES M-TYFir NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? YES MBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X Y€T- RATITE WU- d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YE MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X Yt MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE 4- Explanation: The m ed is at a4 f ice4 aj i.l,L a tt za c t .orne new veh.c.wLa t, 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE N b) Police protection? X YES RATTE NO c) Schools?X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE- NO e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE N Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO 4100 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES Wail" NO` e) Storm water drainage? X Y f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X Yam— MAYBE NU— Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES M- 1B NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?X Yam- RWTNE WO-- Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X YES MAYBE Np-- Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Cam' e ConponatLon .f.on Renton. Proponent: go,L..t Upniabtp_ sign nam d Cfur.LLe4 e City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 Qilege airPOra he. Suite 403-4 • Northgate Executive Centre • 155 Northeast 100th • Seattle,Washington 98125 • (206) 522-8586 T e lvtuaA4 10. 1979 pF IRFycut'. 4 ; en ton rrC1`J CQPtanninrttDeryale: 200 724,,LL ;venue. So. FEB 22 197& enton., Lja4htng.ton d -------- 98 055 qti tt^_nti.on CLetlen- e: r4oco4ed . .edi.caL Build ng T L&o t. :;oarf., ; en}on, :'a4h. Deal .h. C-Lezen,, Thank you. .f.o4 yowl ,.er.Lr 4 7anua44 4, 1 c79. e h.w.re Roca coa,2Le ed awl Atet ina44 ;. Lan 4hour ng. -the th.- eroded use a; the iz.e7tatainc, p o-ti Lon o;L Lot 4. s l p Lcut 4hoL Lni' exi4tta¢ con tcm4 o th44 Ae.'La -n g !3o-ttt.on i4 a-Uached. Uuot pito-04a,L would be to con tact 'u i.Ld in.q a4 /hown on out ,vtmen t 44 to p Lan, at th.iA ,tune and to gdtade the -1..to a cco'tcUiw Lj-. S uJ ec.t -to the 4nanctat uLa,G-iL t4, rl, ,,road them cort4tA.wct Baiidtnq B a4 rh .-oe tiro o:? the rtta-j c t at the Location 4hoc,;R on -the attacked . U.e p,L an ihotr-Lrt pha-e two daueLonncn t. E.xca.ua t-i..on. pz.on, Buit6i.nr7. tyro would he used a... a Pl,1.L .to ctea to Bwi,Ld i,nta B a4 .shown on the rha4e two piitl,(rta p/tor.o4at. Builders • Engineers • Management Contractors • Mortgage Financing Pace Two- Renton Lied-LcaL Fi•Ldc r PLea4e note that the da4hed Line 4hourn. on the a.i to plan, way .hown to ed:ta -U.4h the iim i t4 o.4 the phzz e. one con4th ction and was not intended to -L v Lc. that -i t wo uJ..d become a new -LecaL bounda/u4. The Line wa4 4h.oun to a i4-L. .t in, de-teAm Lrz nq the fish4 con4tAuction wLth rte4aec t to Lo ca t-i n q erizt-Ertg. tt ee4. The p o no4 ed deve.Lo n..rcen-t w-i.LL be con4t.tuc ted o4 a a.a t,a o 1,ice hu4i.dina and wLLL not 4equi/r e a Puhth.eit pLat o 1° tot 4. 3 attach a corn.,n..Le-ted env-vtonrzen taL checks i st. LJouLd you k..thc y. -Let me know on what ba4t4 the te.L ag. fee -e,o determined. in, apr.).Lic -::-Lon Pon 4ite aanitouaL - attachPrl. PLea4e aL4an.c e a heattaq date. Stead Pnut th to ugh -ten, wilt be 4a,lrat ed 4horr t.L4.. R taad4caue plan — pite4eatt4 beinq comp-Leted and ijou have n (lade/F.-taking. that ad.L mateA i a•L beLn.a. plte.,n.„ ed wiLL be au brined p Loit to .the date o the A ..e app./tot/at. heatiag. 3 attach owl. cheque in the azo unt o.f two fulnd-ted been. doLLc 74 be m 130.00 ¢'_o4.. the 4ite w n n.o uaL f.2L n c .f.ee and 85.00 .ion -the env-vtonzen taL checat4t Ateu.-ewv }°ee ba4e4, on owe, eat oa-ted buitdin.q co..t o-f. 800, 000.00. /14 4ta ted eattivt cn. .th i4 -Lette,t, we w.L L p uvawtd addl.-Um-tat .wtd i Pt the envutonnen taL fee . .equtted. gou4.4 uew ttuty, c-Li ege OF R4,1 A o THE CITY OF RENTON b Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235- 2550 o P 9-" D SEP-W° January 4 , 1979 Charles Gliege , President Gliege Corporation Suite 403-4 Northeate Executive Center 155 Northeast 100th Seattle , Washington 98125 Dear Mr. Gliege : We have completed review of your medical building proposed to be located on the west side of Talbot Road , south of S . 37th Street . The proposed plans generally conform to City standards and the existing restrictive covenants . Please note the comments indicated on the plans for specific consideration . It should be noted that this site is one of four parcels previously divided by Mr. Dansereau . At the time of that approval , Mr . Dansereau indicated that a master development plan was being considered to assure proper development of the entire property , and to adequately address public access . Although your proposed plans appear to suit the site , no master development plan has been submitted to assist us in evaluating your proposal . Secondly , it appears that a new property line is proposed to extend across the southerly limit of your proposed development . Inclusion of this property line will require a major plat approval as less than five ( 5) years has expired since filing of the previous short plat . A major plat approval will involve a Tentative Plat ( staff review) , Preliminary Plat and Final Plat both require Hearing Examiner and City Council review) approvals prior to issuance of a building permit . Finally , your subject development is located in a P-1 zoning district which requires a Site Plan approval by the Hearing Examiner prior to submittal of plans to the Building Division . Enclosed Letter to Gliege Corporation January 4 , 1979 Page 2 are appropriate forms and applications . As indicated previously , a master development plan for this entire parcel will greatly assist in the approval process for the proposed use . Upon receipt of a complete application and plans , we can schedule a public hearing within four (4 ) weeks . If we can be of further assistance on this matter, please feel free to contact this office at your earliest convenience . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Erick,sen , Planning Uirector David R . Clemens , Associate Planner GYE : DRC : sh QI/egeCorporation Suite 403-4 • Northgate Executive Centre • 155 Northeast 100th • Seattle, Washington 98125 • (206) 522-8586 ilou&.—re,. 27, 1978 OF P Cann ut c. e az.t rtert t fin; f r City. at Renton 200 (!Zi,L.L S.titee:t i !OV 29 -Q t 2 en ton :Jaah.tn g ton. t' P8055 o2r r G DEPP .. . A=.ten t.i_ort. a. David C-Leaen4 2e: P4op.o4ed fl-24 i caL. Buttd i t l) t •.A. C Leaen4, 3 attach a co r4 ci e 4.^.t.ncvuY p Lan4 root a rmed f ca 1. bwi c1 i.n.a. gou toLL Ae ca l.L that a te4tAtct i.ve covenant cane to owt a ttentLon 4wb4eruen- to ow. cry/Lie/I. p te&;t cnahty. n.Lan• rj.ou aunt e4-ted, we have r,.eo'..Ler e.d. the bu:1241w on the site w-Wt a e uLt tna. change .th. the n -tLLr 7 Ltvjou . The 4e4uL.t vs a he-`,et acceA4 two the bcu.Ld inn w-i th the ry a r oii ed_ litW.d ivi. unciwnv ed with the exce.n .i.o n. o.} the ba4 e:>rerr,#. Levet. yh ad i ar/ 44. ,the pa. Li.rtg Lot 44 be`e4 a4 rynaded have b'e.n n(,.dneed. T P-tji-L .L ar the 4 a n.P_ n_tLn b?h pa/Lk-Lac, 4-kat 4. o wLd t o k i .dJ examtae the 4e4/4,4 ed n.,Lan4 and adu4.4e u4 L sou ,Und t h.:.. accen tab-Le 40 that cue ni. h t Nt o ceed w Uh. can 't u:c t i.on. d aIt;trtn4. jot.ur4 ve4ty tu,Ctj, cc ,'-L arv4 e.te cue Ph e.4 .d.=n t Builders • Engineers • Management Contractors • Mortgage Financing NDING. OF FILE FILE TITLE 25ig