Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-446r BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE at& 4 .4679 MICROFILMED OF R4,1 di THE CITY OF RENTONt$z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 oera Sip a' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9A co' FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235 -2593 o P 9 TED SEPjE O Feb:--uary 25, 1980 Mr. Wavman Hamlin 320 Andover Park E. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: File No. SA-446-79; Southland Corporation (7-Eleven Stores) . Dear Mr. Hamlin: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of February 8, 1980, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sincerely, K46.—ifQ .\634"k' fr"4".4"---- Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department. City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 8th day of February 19 80 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, acdressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this day of ` -AD\ a vi 19 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case : Southland Corporation; SA-446-79 The mLnu tea contain a V..4 t o 6 the pan ti.e4 o b necond) February 8, 1980 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION . APPLICANT: Southland Corporation FILE NO. SA-446-79 7-Eleven Stores) LOCATION: Southwest corner of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and N.E. 4th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests site plan approval for the construction of a 7-Eleven grocery store on Lot No. 1 of Tino Cugini Short Plat Number One. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by REPORT: the Examiner on February 4, 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on February 5, 1980 at 9:07 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: Site Plan as submitted Exhibit #3: Landscape Plan as submitted Exhibit #4: Site and Landscape Plan with staff comments Mr. Blaylock added a provision in the Planning Department recommendation for additional landscaping at the northeast corner of the proposed building. The Examiner inquired if landscaping or lawn was proposed between the curb and sidewalk on N.E. 3rd Street. Mr. Blaylock indicated the Planning Department recommendation for low-growing ground cover which would not obscure sight distance for purposes of traffic safety. He also noted that similar sight distance problems on Jefferson Avenue N.E. will preclude planting of trees in that location. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Wayman Hamlin 320 Andover Park E. Tukwila, WA 98188 Mr. Hamlin, representing the applicant, indicated general concurrence with recommendations contained in Exhibit #1, and advised that plans for future building expansion do not exist at this time. However, he expressed objection to a requirement for a five-foot landscape strip on the western property line due to plans for concurrent development of remaining lots in the short plat and a previously executed agreement to provide joint access at that location. He also noted that due to the standard shape of the building which cannot be changed, problems would be caused by provision of an additional five feet of landscaping. Mr. Blaylock advised that the Planning Department would not object to a modification of the requirement for five feet of landscaping upon development of adjacent property to the west when a driveway could be provided and the landscaping removed. The Examiner inquired if the building structure could be shifted five feet to the east. Mr. Blaylock noted that although sufficient space exists to allow a five-foot shift to the east, parking area may not be adequate if future expansion of the building occurs. He also advised a possible alternative to reverse the placement of the building to face in an easterly direction. Mr. Hamlin indicated the applicant's preference to direct the building tc N.E. 3rd Street for advantageous exposure to the bulk of the traffic. SA-446-79 Page Two The Examiner inquired regarding the proposed location of the sign pole. Mr. Hamlin advised that placement would occur towards the northeast corner of the building. He also indicated the applicant's desire to preserve the area in proximity to the sign free from obscuring trees. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the request. There was no response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department. There were no further ccmments. The hearing regarding File No. SA-446-79 was closed by the Examiner at S:37 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a site plan for the Southland Corporation's construction of a 7-Eleven store on the southwest corner of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and N.E. 4th Street. 2. The Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is entered as Exhibit 41. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy A:t of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are in close proximity and may be extended to the subject property. 7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-711 (B-l; Business) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 8. The subject property was annexed into the city in 1966 and was zoned B-1 in 1971. The short plat on the property was filed in October of 1979. 9. The sub-ect property is zoned B-1. The other zoning districts in the area consist of a mixture of zoning types. West of the subject property the land is zoned GS-1 (General; Single Family Residential; minimum lot size 35,000 square feet) . South and east of the subject property is a large G zone (See GS-1, above) . There is an L•-1 (Light Industry) zone just south of the subject property. North of the site are single family residential zones. 10. Land use in the area consists of predominantly single family uses to the north across N.E. 4th Street and developed and developing commercial uses on the south side of N.E. 4th Street. 11. The subject site is level and is covered with scrub grasses. 12. The applicant proposes constructing a 2,400 square foot convenience food store on a lot containing 34,720 square feet. Under the terms of the previously approved short plat any proposal requires site approval by the Hearing Examiner. 13. The applicant's plans indicate that gas pumps may be included in the future, and any alteration of the site would also require site approval under terms of the short plat approval. 14. Through an oversight, the applicant included plans for only eleven parking spaces when tuelve are required pursuant to Section 4-2208.2.F of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. The applicant indicated that the additional space will be provided immediately adjacent to the parking space labeled No. 1 on Exhibit #4. 15. The Parking and Loading Ordinance further requires that unrelieved asphalt parking areas over 10,000 square feet contain internal landscaping of not less than 5% of the area. The applicant, therefore, must provide approximately 1,300 square feet of landscaping for the 26,400 square feet of parking and maneuvering space proposed on the subject property. SA-446-79 Page Three 16. The Planning Department recommended that a five-foot landscape buffer consisting of natural vegetation be required along the eastern property line to provide relief from structures and asphalt paving in this area. 17. The applicant indicated that the subject property and the adjacent property to the west will be developed into an integrated commercial facility, and landscaping of the property line between this lot and the adjacent lot would preclude traffic flow between the properties. 18. The Plann:.ng Department recommended major expansion of the perimeter landscaping along the south and east property lines where the curbs vary from about 25 feet to 60 feet from the property lines. The Plann:Lng Department recommendation recognizes that any landscaping would be jeopardized by street expansion and has generally recommended ground cover and low growing shrubs which could easily be removed. Street trees would be planted between the sidewalk and the property line on the north, east and south. 19. The applicant indicated that the building is constructed from a standard plan and the size and shape is unalterable. The Planning Department indicated that sufficient area exists to enable shifting the structure on the lot about five feet to the east to accomplish the five feet of required landscaping. 20. An eight-foot sidewalk is required in commercial zones pursuant to Section 9-1108. 7.H of the Subdivision Ordinance. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed facility as modified by the Planning Department appears to be a well- designed complex which will serve the residential neighborhood to the north and provide a convenient stopping off point for commuters returning home. 2. The facility will satisfy the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan by providing needed and environmentally sound commercial facilities along major arterials, and convenience for the shopping public. It will also expand the tax base of the city and will enable the subject property to be used for its highest and best use as limited by the subject property's B-1 zoning. 3. The proposed landscaping will be quite extensive and will provide both a pleasing visual appearance to those passing the facility on N.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th Street, and will at the same time serve as an effective buffer for those residences located north of the subject property across N.E. 4th Street. 4. The landscaping should include approximately 17 feet of ground cover on the south of the subject proposal between the curb and the sidewalk and street trees between the sidewalk and the property line. On the east, the landscaping should consist of approximately 22 feet of shrubs and ground cover between the sidewalk and the property line and about 30 feet of ground cover between the sidewalk and the curb. Street trees should be planted in such a manner as not to interfere with sight lines of the turning traffic. The landscaping on the north should consist of a mixture of street trees, shrubs and ground cover between the sidewalk and the property line. The proposed building should be moved approximately five feet to the east and a five-foot landscape buffer should be planted along this property line for the entire distance. A limited amount of landscaping can be removed to permit the construction of a drive upon the completion and occupancy of the adjacent western property to enable the integration of the commercial facilities. The final landscaping plans shall also include additional internal landscaping to meet the requirements of Section 4-2204.8.B(3) . The additional landscaping shall include but not necessarily be limited to landscaping the area east of parking space 6 and south of parking space #5 of Exhibit #4. Pursuant t.o Section 4-2204.8.A, the landscaping shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. 5. The traffic situation in the area may present some problems with left turn maneuvers from N.E. 3rd Street onto Jefferson and into the subject proposal. The future installation of gas pumps would most likely complicate this situation and the Public Works Department should implement traffic control measures commensurate with the developing situation. h SA-446-79 Page Four DECISION: Exhibit #4, the site plan as modified by the Planning Department and as further modified herein is approved subject to the following: 1. The installation of eight-foot sidewalks on the north, east and south perimeter of the subject property. 2. The modification of the site plans to locate the main building five feet from the west property line and the installation of landscape vegetation along this property line; such landscaping may be removed to permit the circulation of traffic from the subject property to the adjacent property to the west, but only insofar as is necessary to permit circulation. The parcels are not to be treated as one large parking lot without internal landscaping. 3. The installation of landscaping along the north, east and south property lines and between the sidewalks and curbs to include trees, shrubs and ground cover and subject to the approval of the Planning Department as outlined in Conclusion No. 4 above and Exhibit #4. 4. The provision of the required 5% internal landscaping as required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance (Section 4-2208.8.B(3) ) . 5. The installation of underground sprinkler systems pursuant to Section 4-2208.8.C. 6. The completion of Conditions No. 1 through 5 to the satisfaction of the Planning Department prior to the issuance of the occupancy permit. 7. Any further modification of the subject property including but not limited to the installation of gasoline pumps shall require site review by the Hearing Examiner. ORDERED THIS 8th day of February, 1980. Fred J. K man Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 8th day of February, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Wayman Hamlin, Southland Corp. , 320 Andover Park E. , Tukwila, WA 98188 TRANSMITTED THIS 8th day of February, 1980 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M, Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before February 22, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER F E B 51980 PLANNING DEPARTMENT AM PM 7,819110,11112,1,213141516 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING EXHIBIT 1'1. / FEBRUARY 5, 1980 ITEM NO. 9 APPLICANT: SOUTHLAND CORPORATION ( 7-11 Stores) FILE NUMBER: Site Plan Approval SA-446-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site plan approval for the construction of a 7-Eleven grocery store on Lot 1 of Tino Cugini Short Plat Number One. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record: TINO CUGINI 2 . Applicant : SOUTHLAND CORPORATION Contract Purchaser 3. Location : (Vicinty Map The southwest corner of Jefferson Attached)Avenue N.E . and N.E . 4th Street . 4. Legal Description: Lot #1 of Tino Cugini Short Plat #1 5. Size of Property: 34, 720 square feet . 6. Access: Via N.E . 3rd and 4th Streets . 7 . Existing Zoning: B-1 , Business Use 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: B-1 , Business Use; R-1 , Residence Single Family; SR-1 , Residence Single Family; L-1 , Light Industrial; G' , General Classification District . 9. Comprehensive Land Commercial Use Plan: 10 . Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on January 23, 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on January 18, 1980. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2249 on June 22 , 1966. It was rezoned from "G" to B-1 by Ordinance #2655 on August 20 , 1971. A short plat of the property was approved by the Hearing Examiner on August 17, 1979. The short plat was filed in early October by the City Clerk. On December 26 , 1979 a Lot Line Adjustment was approved by the City of Renton and has subsequently been filed by the property owner. Application was made for site approval by the Southland Corporation; however, the application was dismissed by the Hearing Examiner on January 10, 1980 as a result of irregularities in the site plan and actual lot dimensions. PLANNING DEPARTME PRELIMINARY REPOR± 20 THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, Site Plan Approval SA-446-79 FEBRUARY 5, 1980 PAGE TWO D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The site is level . 2. Soils: Arents , Everett material (An) . Permeability is rapid, and available water capacity is low. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight . This soil is used for urban development . 3. Vegetation: Scrub grasses exist on the site . At sometime in the past all natural vegetation was removed. 4. Wildlife: Some rodents and small birds undoubtably live on the site. 5. Water : No signs of surface water were present at the time of investigation on January 18, 1980. 6. Land Use: Vacant . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The area is in transition from generally undeveloped and low intensity land uses to a mixture of multiple family, commercial and light industrial. F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1. Water and Sewer: A 16" water main runs along NE 3rd Street in a northeasterly-southwesterly direction and a 3" main runs east west : on NE 4th Street from Jefferson Ave. N.E . to Index Ave. N.E. An 8" sanitary sewer is located on NE 4th Street withing 500 feet to the east of the subject site. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #107 operates along Monroe Avenue NE within 1/4 mile to the east of the subject site. 4. Schools: N/A 5. Recreation : N/A G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-711 , B-1 , Business Use H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: 1. Land Use Report , 1965, Objectives , Pages 17 and 18. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems: Anticipated impacts are minimal . Storm water will be contained within two storage facilities on the site. 2. Population/Employment : Population will not be impacted by the construction of the store. Normally one employee will be working in the store on a 24 hour basis. During the peak demand hours there is the possibility of two or three employees being present . 3. Schools : Normally schools would not be impacted by the location of a grocery store. However, because of the close proximity of the site to Renton Vocational Technical Institute , pedestrian patterns could be modified especially during the noon hour . PLANNING DEPARTME— PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, Site Plan Approval SA-446-79 FEBRUARY 5, 1980 PAGE THREE 4. Social : No significant social impacts are anticipated. 5 . Traffic: A typical 7-Eleven Store generates approximately 750 customers daily. The peak hours are between 6 and 8 A.M. and 5 and 6: 30 P .M. A steady flow of customers patronize the store from 8 P.M. to midnight . Traffic access is addressed in the analysis. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Rention ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43- 21C, a declaration of non-significance has been prepared for the subject proposal. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5. City of Renton Fire Department 6. City of Renton Parks Department L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the B-1 , Business Use zoning of the subject site. 2. The applicant proposes to construct a 2 ,400 square foot convenience grocery store open 24 hours a day on a 34, 720 square foot site. The site plan as submitted anticipates the future construction of gas pumps and the probable expansion of the building to the north. Any future additions should require another site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner. The construction of gas pumps could have dramatic traffic impacts. Both N.E. 3rd and N.E . 4th Streets handle a large volume of traffic. This will be increased with the construction of residences in the Highbury Subdivision and the occupancy of Vantage Point Condominiums. 3. The proposal as submitted complies with the requirements of the B-1 , Business Use Zone; however, it does not comply with the required number of parking spaces of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. Twelve parking spaces are required and only 11 are provided. This can be corrected by adding an additional parking space to the north of parking space designated as #1 on the site plan. Approximately, 26 ,400 square feet of the site of 34 , 720 square feet is covered with asphalt for parking and traffic manuevering. No internal landscaping is provided in the parking area as required by Section 4-2204(8)B( 3) . It appears that the parking lot has been designed for possible expansion of the store. Either the perimeter landscaping areas can be widened to meet the requirement of 5% or two landscaped areas east of the building can be designated as permanent . A total of 131E square feet of landscaped area will have to be added. This would require widening the perimeter landscaping areas by 5 feet or constructing a new landscaping bed of approximately 340 square feet at the southeast corner of the building and preserving the 980 square feet of landscaping at the northeast corner of the building and southwest of the entrance off of NE 4th Street when any expansions of the building are considered. PLANNING DEPARTMElvl PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, Site Plan Approval SA-446-79 FEBRUARY 5, 1980 PAGE FOUR 4. Access to the subject site is provided directly off of both NE 3rd and NE 4th Streets . Access from NE 4th does not pisent any traffic problems. Some traffic congestion could result from traffic traveling east on NE 3rd making a left turn into the site. NE 3rd presently has 5 lanes of traffic adjacent to the site. The 5th lane is a two way left turn lane , but it currently functions solely as a stacking lane for left turns onto Jefferson Avenue N.E . An automobile attempting a left turn into the site could cause traffic to back up beyond the length of the turn lane thus causing some congestion at the top of the long grade on NE 3rd. This is complicated by an automobile attempting a left turn from the site onto NE 3rd going east . In addition the peak hours of demand for the store coincide with the peak traffic hours on NE 3rd. There is the possibility that access to NE 3rd will be limited to right turns only in the future. The Traffic Engineering Division has not recommended this solution at the present time. 5. Neither the site plan nor the landscaping plan addressed the improvements and landscaping of the excess public right- of-way between the present curbing and the property lines . Along NE 3rd there is 25 feet between the curb and the property line. An 8 foot wide sidewalk is required in all commercially zoned areas. This along with the possibility of widening the street with another 11 foot lane would place the back edge of the sidewalk along the property line. The normal placement of street trees would be in the 6 foot wide landscaping strip immediately behind the curb ; however, because of a serious sight clearance problem and the location of a highg power transmission line farther to the west , the street trees should be planted behind the sidewalk. The 5 ' foot wide planting bed is sufficient . The landscaping between the sidewalk and the present curb should be very low ground cover not to obstruct the sight clearance . The use of Ajuga Reptans would be appropriate. It is low, not over 6" , and has a beautiful blue flower. To the east of the site there is over 60 ' of public right- of-way which must be improved with sidewalks and landscaping. The sidewalk must be 8 ' as required by code. If the back edge of the sidewalk is placed 22 ' east of the property line , approximately 30 ' would still be available for widening the intersection if necessary. The number of shurbs shown on the landscape plan east of the property line should be continued out to the sidewalk. Landscaping east of the sidewalk should be limited to the Ajuga Reptans to allow adequate sight clear- ance. The exact location of the sidewalk ties to the existing sidewalks on the other two corners should be reviewed by the Public Works Department when specific detailed improvement plans are submitted by the applicant . Along NE 4th Street the existing pavement is 24 feet from the property line. The street will require widening and the exact location of the curb is unkown at this time. The street trees should be planted in the 6 ' wide strip betweef, the curb and sidewalk. This sidewalk is also 8 ' wide. The building has been setback 50 ' from the property line probably anticipating future expansion. However , the single family residences located on the north side of NE 4th Street are visually impacted by the location of the 7-Eleven Store . To buffer the residences from the subject site it is suggested that an additional row of street trees be placed on the south side of the sidewalk on top of a 2z foot high berm. To assure that there is sufficient width to accomodate the berm, a 10 foot wide landscaping easement should be required. The site plan does not provide any buffering of the adjacent commercial areas. A five foot landscaping strip should be provided adjacent to the western boundary of the site. An additional five feet will be required at the time of the development of the adjacent lot to provide a ten foot buffer PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, Site Plan Approval SA-446-79 FEBRUARY 5, 1980 PAGE FIVE M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the foregoing analysis, the staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve the site plan for the Southland Corporation, File Number SA-446-79 , with the following conditions: 1. Addition of 1 parking space north of the parking space designated as #1 on the site plan. 2 . Addition of a landscaping bed of a minimum of 340 square feet at the southeast corner of the building to fulfill the interior parking lot landscaping requirements of Section 4-2204( 8)B( 3) . C emu. 3, Constrution of 8 foot wide sidewalks along N.E. 3rd and N.E . 4th Streets plus along the east side of the property as stated in L-5 of the analysis. 4. Modification of the landscaping plan as discussed in L-5 of the analysis . Plans to be approved by Planning Department prior to issuance of building permit . 5 . Future development or expansion of the site will require site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner. 6. Modification of the site plan to provide five feet of landscaping along the western boundary of the site. I •/ , f. •• :4:1 u;:J,,'1t•- y 1,SJ• ' . 11 t / 1 ' T L1'JaL. 1•id?' i Jt 4. II T.'° t` 1 I. N, it- •- c ', v,A lY. .c, , ,• -' E-,,,1•.t1u• l• L, r • 4 LJ r'' •1 ems, 41 11. a „ [, • ••' . y .• • ' —.. '-_ I NSi TM pi, ..l y ,mow 1\ 1 sr •.., w • . 'I• ._.• ' , , ..• I N.C. w•Yc M[.V'IPN A i'• joy' i• • Ys' V `••/ t1 1+ 18 {SA 1i.t 11 1. 1 11 . t. 1.1r • T` Li L r1 y.. V t •••• it ° ' =i `K' it4lr., j•IMI,1-.i•._•1• r oln. 1,,,,, I[I>..;• 'al_.'''• r _•y .. `• •',.`-, r`. _- I i SR 1.t_t. • 1 710.iip • i f- { ... t- O? r•.,-1- ! •• - •.0 J•I~ r• ....y ti :,M u.c c • = 2,,• ---• • • - —"..): 10% .t,4;;Nr . " 11. ,..!, . ,..'•''. '.4 : 1 , -I 1 6 ...'" Is.: .i t: :17: ''''1 r-i__ .; t.......,,, tI5 i i Rw : t . . • ti+ . a job I e B oaf n e J" Jtiiiii -- V 1 L 1 d sty ,•. ,.>:. B o a A F G GREENWOOD CEMETERY F'=`' SUBJECT /"SITE B E I c, I li j/ t. jr), ! L c c.) . , ,. i4„, 1 i. i.l' MOryi J = t I •El i as MTOLIVET I I y, giI a A, .;'. idirt I rr-V IF CEMETERY 1 i,i 1 .Iryt I i yyI i I lmr::^a+•caaavura:•r. ." :.,.asmsa anT3 am-0M.' . or.. -.'-4, 3 I I / / 1 1 , , I. I i I OVA\ . 1 ' 1' 1 5O I 1 ' ia.azn-...aaasvrsW, Irmanamslas.............zasr c[a[cxc.:.am.ct'xrr.-cw ress...aaR........ APPLICANT The Southland Corporation TOTAL AREA 34 , 720 Sq. Ft . PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 3rd and N.E. 4th Streets EXISTING ZONING B-1, Business Use EXISTING USE VACANT 4 PROPOSED USE 7-Eleven Convenience Grocery Store 1 Commercial 1 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS 1 r',--L-1,5•21C=536• •••••••aerawc..eme awryc,,,a,--"aor.1,arsaan.x--weezemo6-,..r_evas.--mr—ors,le.o.-A.4, il N X‘,, Landscaping \ 1 4N IPAsphaltN , b:0,1 I j ri4,.1\ k. 4,,,- r, l 7 N40. 41 i I I 0 t z 7 RftonP N\,,,:\ andscaping I 7 0 Landscaping 1 117-sLeVEK1 5ToRE w41.1( 9 Asphalt 44 i 1 0 FAciLiTY 0"-'\ STOrCP1 WATEd i II ST The Southland Corporation File Nullber SA-446-79 mow.--..—x. mear1, — AS SUBMITTED i THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION , 4'ILE NUMBER SA-446-79 30'Landscaping STAFF COMMENTS 60. ih8,Sidewalk to f a' x 22 ' 1 0 M • I Landscaping S. i _,. 1‘ 43 . c) 2 zi - cd r a r,) .ri 1 r11-t- Landscaping 4 I f i • 1,' c1\ r E-, !:- . Asphalt CZ 241 r.i 4-, d' 6408 ' 10-9 t z 3 4 Landsc ping k'' siCi1bAr-I ,-, fl 40 o ,1 s CS , c3 e3 N. A "r 4. jf? r0i f cad a 7 A i 1 4_,) E) N. i S ao. o Ci) 0 h GO NefirluKc Got;Landscaping a c i-5LtVEU STORE Asphal ve;" y 2:I00`10 14 rc/c Picx.cr ' T CM wr11- I1 VI. 0(P 1/ .J mmr 1': / I' "' 1 mimmi I a) r.., i-- i r r / i 44..,..,„.. 0 \---) 0 ( 0 .- 1 ri/ 44.- 1- t Z%./,,./ • ' ii Tr A I CCI Z < 4 E- 4 • i 4/ ' i ! 0 Z 41 ci) Fx1 I PI 1: 4McEni P 55 a -...,...... i' l r; AAR-.-; P ) N, • . i • 0 - 0 i 7 • // / 1 1 l'', k..- 1--- S---- 1 .....„. i i- 4 ck; I. II it 1 / it 1 I] J 1--- 1 ------ .--- , \ • 7 4 r `- t).•. 7 . - 7 L he t o 1., . E- 4p4 pl 0 E-- 1 k-\\\ \ r 2.- u) cn it- Y il ,,,.... o\••) \‘‘, i I.•- r4 xlia.. s. i- e 1 • LAcu 1 00 !.• , C) \ i I r"7", (''-'" r,•—•''''' , '- c• I fr -- 4-, v4 Y)• • a. 7'.'\ I, k'.! to \:‘ t.: , 1 T\ i t Y •/\ 1 o () r, 1 ji .. \ \,„ 4 01 Ott) 1 0 0 n1 ii ,') 1 \ ; .• .. • I., r , 0 I.• (.) I() i i ii c. ii . ., ,. Oft . ] i 0 d 1' I 7.-- e• . , • • •;.. I..; ! ii_. o 04- c,-- cc-- 1 9 II 7 I!! I ; o i• ; fi • !. d!i;NI9entonPlanningDepartment DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application :—e 8tt. 1/,44201.0 t ataf_WAS, ,1f' d r 17•17COA,vevtetrotte Fella .74 g z " 7669 es ar .. Location : rens1 r -f a fz•v c A ppl ic ant . F * aj CO¢ Qiv .e3 __ TO : Parks Departmentp SCHEDULED HEARING DATE 9 Police Department A, R, C. MEETING Public Works Department Engineering Division OF F ,._ Tr,r ffic Engineering IFIVEI) c Building Division 4JV 30 1079 i Utilities Engineering i f.. ' J 1,P^ JJFireDepartmentf`, U DEr q-, I F'I. I IORF I GTNEI I'I'LI C f I P I LV EH I S ,'P.I r..nT Ior nl C)1! () p P -DVII FD ll CO\IF RE.NCE B HELD ON Al 9:0)0 AM IN THE 1HIRD FLOOR COI= =R= r RUD '., E YO IR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ITT ND THE ARC, /PrLE SE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: C 0 PM ON _ ,[, 79 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: t) (' Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved C 7/4 - , , _____ 1 ) ASignatur-e—of- Director or Authorized Re resentative // 2) 2 ) p Date i2 E ti'I.E td I JJ G DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved ignature of Ti rector 01' Utfic»'i zed—Representzyt\i ve Date 4Y16 anRentonPlanningDepartmer DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : 1(W4.e r401,1W A.Vertf Lies Fee.), '4avp-e ` oir e eds_triantoftsdi lolcation : AflejC,atiter r Applicant :5e TO,: Parks Departmentp SCHEDULED HEARING DATE ,_1 9 Police Department A, R, C. MEETING /2/ . /79 Public Works Department Engneerinq Division raffic Engineering Building Division i Utilities Engineering C+ fire Department o C ii =PI S OR SUGGESTInyS RE_GAR.)ING - I .Ia I I IC FOR THE AR LICAT IO lZLVIE:U CONFERE JCE O JJ RC) SHOULD d PROVIDED ONARC) ( _3E La ON j Al 9l a f)f) AM IN THE 1 H I RI) FLOOR CONLLRENCE F YO JR DEPARTMEN 7D I V I S I ON REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TOAITF.ND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE FLANNING DEPARTMENT1ON _ 61 j j,_ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved 7/1- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved Signature oif DDii rector or-7CutTii»-zed-Representative Date 08d ri,4 enton Planning Department DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application -j ` 44 4a41.7 r g.c, 7.17 Location : ` '' 47_1 .e- l_v, es Applicant :aSaDitAbm,J__69_,epiairizedstal______________ TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :Q Police Department A, R. C, MEETING /2/6/79 Public to `ks Department ngineerinq Division Traffic Engineering RN O Building Division Utilities Engineering V r 30 lf. i: Fire Department off QQ T.711. I CPF(S-E-TikinI'e IVI TINS '1(IEIIE J P' RIISME[.. R_DVIDFD IJ Co ARC)T O .3E HELD ON9 _____ Al O:0)O AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCEO1 , Wyk DEPAR T MEN 7D I V I S I ON REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TOATTNTHE_ ARC, PLEASE: PROVIDE 1 HE COMMENTS TO I HE WILL I NG DEPARTMENTBY ): UO PM ON / 7 ter .r_c_:x:='_ -=_--_—=-r:.c_-__=_s.____._.:--r.-_=`==z-'=-..:__.—=•c araswcarar REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved X Approved with condi ions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized I epr .sentativ Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved tom' ignature of Di ;actor or—Autfioi izcT Representative Date ` 114RanRentonNanningDepartmen , DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application . c d ,tee P s5/ fit40"7 1)e l® Cd ye ` vet Cry"-- ',defe ' L o c Lion :4'__Cad e.__af a '° '_ & il r Applicant . T' 0, ,0 -. ® g fia ____ TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : :',/ .f .,'' p Police Department A, R. C, MEETING._f ' /77 Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division tilities Engineering F/ ire Department I Of I I ORFSUGI ES !NS REGARJ)I ff1G H! IS ,11 iI I CAT SONJ SHOULD BE, PROVIDEDALICArJO 'I REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE pump a-Al 9:0() AM IN HE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCER ';, F YO JR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TOATTNQTHEARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENTBY ?: UO PM ON l REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION Approved lei Approved with conditions Not Approved INSTALLATioti ok Nev-) F Ire kL1 t r.can r 1 ' C I . 3 PA ,I.. , e. 77SignatofirectororAut •ize Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ul«iz--( O 7. Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved 5(44.):c TO NSinc.c_,a1iJN•t ciz ( )/97"61L1'lpitir lM In/0e,t' A 6. J " 4 Are -- Cow CI s F665 "c) C_r r? OF L , t -w+0n,A..1 I ki. J T 3(3!; 57 A 'Vvtj e4 PLAkt. 1U/- R&v0 )4,0 ' 'T n(241'c_.--,6ki/ ,old , 1pLn! ae0.02c-'. 917 D E/ Sct f t w,e igi- 5--is 064i. Cider.,& - 7 j o l7 54 Fc SCL cyz O__SA--yet / O i g a ure of Di rector or Authori zed Representat ve Date t FINAL :LARATION OF Iiimmill N-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . SA-446-79 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-510-79 Ej FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Construction of 2 , 400 square foot building on a 34 , 720 square foot site to be utilized for a 24 hour convenience grocery store . Proponent The Southland Corporation Location of Proposal Lot #1- Tino Cugini Short Plat #1 Lead Agency City of Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to ® have not have a sig rI ficant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is Ar is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) ( c ) . This decision was mad after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . NON- Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : 1 . The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan . 2 . The subject site is adjacent to an arterial street capable of handling the traffic. 3. The project has provided landscape screening to buffer the project from the adjacent single family residences. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Planning Director . Date February 4, 1980 Signature d44. '2_..,G ._ _ . _.— e. City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 OF R4A THE CITY OF RENTON z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o . CHARLES J. DELAURENTI p MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9 cp' FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0 P gTED SEPj e January 10, 1980 Mr. Way Hamlin Southland Corporation 320 Andover Park East Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: File No. SA-446-79; Southland Corporation Site Approval. Dear Mr. Hamlin: The Examiner may grant a continuance to a time and date certain for good cause shown. Since it is impossible to determine the exact time and date at which required information will be submitted in the above entitled matter, it is appropriate to dismiss the application without prejudice. The applicant under such circumstances may refile the application without waiting for the expiration of time limits set for rehearing the same or similar matters. The matter then is set for a hearing by the Planning Department as is any other new item and legal notice is similarly posted and published. Sincerely, FrEd J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Parties of Record Planning Department City Clerk OF 1?4, o THE CITY OF RENTON y Z. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.N055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 941) Qt• 235- 2550 itED SEP1EMO December 20 , 1979 Southland Corporation 320 Andover Park E Tukwila , Washington 98188 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL IN B- 1 ZONE TO CONSTRUCT CONVENIENCE FOOD STORE , FILE NO : SA-446-79 property located on the southwest corner of Jefferson Avenue N . E and N . E . 4th Street Dear Gentlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on November 20 , 1979 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for January 8 , 1980 at 9 : 00 am . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director By• Rog- r . B ay . c Associate Planner PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 8 , 1980 APPLICANT : SOUTHLAND CORPORATION ( 7-11Stores) FILE NUMBER: Site Plan Approval SA-446-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site pla{i approval of Lot 1 of Tino Cugini Short Plat #1 for the construction of a 711 grocery store. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: TINO CUGINI 2. Applicant : SOUTHLAND CORPORATION 3. Location : Southwest corner of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Vicinity Map Attached) and N.E. 4th Street . 4. Legal Description : Lot #1 of Tino Cugini Short Plat #1 5. Size of Property : 34, 720 square feet 6. Access : Via N.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th Street 7. Existing Zoning: B-1 , Business Use 8 . Existing Zoning in B-1 , Business Use; R-1 , Residence Single the Area: Family; SR-1 , Residence Single Family; L-1 , Light Industrial ; "G" , General Classification District . 9 . Comprehensive Land Commercial Use Plan : 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Renton Record Chronicle on December 28, 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on December 19 , 1979. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2249 on June 22 , 1966. It was rezoned from "G" to B-1 by Ordinance #2655 on August 20 , 1971 . A short plat of the property was approved by the Hearing Examiner on August 17, 1979. The short plat was filed in early October by the City Clerk. On December 26 , 1979 a Lot Line Adjustment was approved by the City of Renton and has subsequently been filed by the property owner. D. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : The site plan as submitted by the Southland Corporation does not coincide with the Lot 1 as recently adjusted. The lot has been reduced in width by 9 feet to meet the contractual agreement between the Southland Corporation and Mr. Tino Cugini . This modification of 9 feet would result in major site design alteration. The applicant will have to submit a new site plan for review. E. PL1UNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the public hearing be continued indefi- nitely and readvertised at the time the applicant submits new information and a site plan. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 8 19 80 , AT 9:00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1 . SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL 1 TO CONSTRUCT CONVENIENCE FOOD STORE IN B-1 ZONE , File SA-446-79; property located on the southwest corner of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and N.E. 4th Street . 2. A.A.D. INVESTMENT CO. , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO R-2 AND B-1, File R-457-79 ; property located on the southeast corner of Duvall Ave. N.E. and Sunset Blvd. N.E. 3. A.A.D. INVESTMENT CO. , APPLICATIONS FOR THREE-LOT SHORT PLAT, File Short Plat 443-79 , EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING ACCESS, File E-444-79 , and WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, File W-445-79; property located on the southeast corner of Duvall Ave. N.E. and Sunset Blvd. N.E. 4. SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT, INC. , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT TRUCK AND TRAILER MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE FACILITY IN M-P ZONE , File SA-452-79; property located at 400 S.W. 34th St . Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANAURY 8, 1980 AT 9 :00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED December 28, 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT ARE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , on the day of 4/19 'SIGNED .it7444eiel_ NOTICE THIS PROPERTY GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N. E. AND N. E. TH STREET LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPT. I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON JANUARY 8, 1980 BEGINNING AT 9 :00 AM AM CONCERNING ITEM [Vi S REZONE r1APECIAL PERMIT SITE APPROVAL I N o1SZONET FOI LEEK I ENSA-v46D79TORE WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION AFFIDAVIT I , sort-l4v.t.-t0 Go(. . l ( tE f - -t I-4) , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the roperty involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. RhSubscribedandswornbeforemek this o tJe day of 197/ , 2 Notary Public in and for the State of NOV 2019 Washington, residing at 92y' NGDEPR; 4Nameof-- -- ii-Otary Public) Sign to e of Owner) Address)Address) T014C.utLA •UuA• crkl&% City) State) 2a ,) s--/s - (=--1 t k Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM BEN 0/1; 8c. 1 NsiS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY v 47/ Application No. 75/e 7y' e/ Environmental Checklist No. `Lt'/-` „?/ 7y PROPOSED, date:FINAL , /date: 0 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance ElDeclaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed , even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent 6DuZbt(/P.P-ti4,10• (W ki* 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: La sett-to 0 arc- PPML • 7.1 41$1 c-c 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : VW) SF Coy-lV'£a{i E rtc E goo o Sze b K 6 C.fcn-v uE. s t Sao) . 2-at 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : A via•-rr LOT u, (z k.4 V+1,1° L rt-tc.& V 74.--cw1--t — 6 lLBK S 4 '() - S .es 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : Io(LT 13,AT-T 80.51 0-4*.A S L-te..k.-4.5E-5 1 FA I."tx p eeLM-t( ' gL04.. 1JEvtJ-uiT• 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain : f l;S rtJn GkS iSU -0 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: No. 2. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II . NVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic Xsubstructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief xfeatures? YES MA BE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? L YES MBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , xeitheronoroffthesite? YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the cbedoftheoceanoranybay , inlet or lake? YES MBE NO Explanation : $A c cret-+Z1 OF Sac. Wtw 11X PA.4E42. 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: 2 cbNy a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient ai p quality? C J 0 YES YB NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? 4 M NO PCANN\' Y B c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? C YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? x YES MAYBE NO 1,e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? CZ YEI— MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? G YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YET— MAYBE N Explanation: hUDCT-10141"0— tr)2i°n'"ta°E, PLAY Eos 2LSut.T e'; Pgoncdo PA.%,tr(C. • 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YES FTTITE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? K YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YTS- MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YET— MAYBE NO Explanation: 4-r 5) Fauna. 44. 11 the proposal result in : a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish , benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? k--' YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare?YES RACE N Explanation: #010-1 c o H L--16 N"r ,Dv E: Tcz S 7 V1-E L bM T 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 1110) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to , oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? s-- MAYBE NO Explanation: 5- ON 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , create a demand for additional housing? 0 `\ p' ch jAYBf , Explanation: j}• M o f•y 6 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : —,, L A N N- A a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?G YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE 0 f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE 0 Explanation: 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : Ia) Fire protection? YES MAYBE 0 b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? k YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X) YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? YES MBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal ? 412 YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE 0 Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? K- YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? 06 YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: WAG` <AOR signe ) 11, 4 N A`A-I-1 M name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 CITY OF RENTON cks.NT'04/ APPLICATION 4C 9 V ti9 .SITE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE USE ONLY v Q\ 7 f QQ File No. SA- 1/6 ` 79 Filing Date Oar ..?O 7 Application Fee $ Receipt No . A NN1_ Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name SDOTt L-t cr-tip camp ( v.4rs.vfM M-U•••t) PhoneC2- ) Si S. - C71 t) Address SZc O0.14eA 194,4-K 11. 7o u c.-e , ()J o% , 2 . Property location WC.. pR V 3" l (-Q 'PT" S KAAurs 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) Srr PLAN) 4. Number of acres or square feet /r ppnox. 3'11( 72_0 Present zoning 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? A ?-2.L-E vc alkivp4 I B Mc E Fda,D 6. The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. Rev, 1-77 ENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE ates OA / IC") 446 .79