Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-452BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE MICROFILMED
ji5 i „
45279
OF RA.
y IDTHE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
o ammo BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
90 co- 235 - 2550
0,
91 1-
0 SEPt
P
September 9, 1980
Terry French
Superior Fast Freight
400 S .W. 34th Street
Renton, Washington 98055
RE : Landscaping Maintenance
Dear Mr . French :
In response to your letter dated September 5 , 1980, I am
confirming the requirements of landscape maintenance per Ordinance
4-734(E) (3) . As you have noted, there are four acceptable
methods outlined that will satisfy the City ' s requirement , any
which would be acceptable. You have expressed that you would
prefer to file a three-year service contract with the City by
extending the two-year contract you presently hold. This would
appear to be a fair option in lieu of a $15 , 000 bond. Upon
filing your contract with the City, we would be happy to grant
our approval for the final inspection.
If you have any further questions , feel free to contact this
department .
Very truly yours ,
Gordon1Y. Ericksen,
Planning Director
1 .
Jerry Lind, P anner/Designer
JL; sh
carrfvr /L sI
t - r-i—/ y--
kg vnyte FAST REM/
000 Southwest 34th Street•Renton, Washington 98055• Telephone (206) 251-5005
September 5, 1980
I( A- .
City of Renton
Planning Department
SEP v ;*,'
1.
200 Mill venue South A ir
Renton, W 98055
Attent_..on: Mr. Jerry Lind 1
Re: Landscaping Maintenance
Dear Jerry:
Per our conversation of 9/4/80, I am writing to verify the following facts:
a. The Bulk Storage Facilities Ordinance 4-734: (E) (3), pertaining
to landscape maintenance and the requirement fcr a three-year
service contract, is the only portion of the ordinance Superior
has yet to comply with.
b. Filing with the City Clerk of a copy of a three-year service
contract would eliminate the requirement to post a $15,000
bond with the City Clerk.
For informational purposes, Superior Fast Freight presently has a two-year
contractual agreement with Evergreen Services Corporation, the landscaping
service that did the original installation at our site. Additionally, with
the completion of our maintenance facility, Phase II (total completion) of
our landscaping requirements is presently being negotiated.
Please ver fy the aforementioned items (paragraphs a and b) and notify me
by letter f my understanding of the ordinance requirements is correct.
Sincerely,
41,(1
T.R. ,French
Assistant Operations Manager
TRF:cb
Serving Oregon• Washington• Idaho•Alaska • Western Canada from Southern California and Arizona
S8 - 7,5-. - 77
A.
N o THE CITY OF RENTON
U
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
cZiMIMIR BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
9 CO' 235- 2550
0,
9grEO SEP1eg*)
MEMORANDUM
October 7, 1980
TO: Board of Public Works
FROM: Planning Department
RE: SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT - DEFERRAL OF
SIDEWALK ON S.W. 29TH STREET
BACKGROUND:
Superior Fast Freight extends from S.W. 34th to S.W. 29th
Streets. The applicant is requesting a deferral of side-
walk improvements on S.W. 29th Street. S.W. 29th Street
is a cul-de-sac, which could have several other industries
fronting on the property in the future. The street is
constructed and grades have been established in that
area. It is illogical that the applicant would wish to
defer the improvement because in a two year period the
cost could be substantially higher . From the City' s
point of view, deferrals should be granted only in very
limited cases. The question of timing of future develop-
ment does not appear to be relevant. The City is presently
in the position where it seems like only one individual
or project holds up the completion of the off-site
improvements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Denial of the request.
RJ$: wr
4110.
Date : October 2 i 80
1
C 1
v
F- Ir
jam.
i
5:,
r
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS REFERRAL MEETING OF October 8, 1980
r., t
Gordon Ericksen, Planning
Gary Norris, Traffic
John Webley, Parks
Richard Geissler, Fire
TO:Richard Houghton, Engineering
Rom Nelson, Building
SUBJECT: Deferral of Sidewalk on S.W. 29th St. , Superior Fast Freight ,
400 S.W. 34th St.
COMMENTS:
BOARD OF r f)111. , c wontCS
APPLICATION FOR AI.1'I At.
CITY OF ttt N I ON
DATE OF FILING /O/i /P • Gf1/11 YL1)
DEN ItD
DATE OF HEARING, /' /0 b APPEALED -- - .
SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHTI . NAME OF APPLICANT _
PLEASE PRINTS
2'. ADDRESS 400 S.W. 34TH STREET
3 . ADDRESS OF-PROPERTY i'NVOI.VLD SAME AS ABOVE
r 4 . LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OF PROPERTY INVOLY„f;D : LOT S 6 8 ffI.00K 1 PLAT
WITHIN BURLINGTON NORTRN ORILLIA INDUSTRIAL PARK OF RENTON DIVISION
5 . PRESENT" ZONING M P
6 . , EXACT VAR I ANC REQUESTED THAT THE REQUIREMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF A SIDEWALK ON S.W. 29TH STREET BE DEFERRED FOR TWO YEARS OR UNTIL
ADJACENT PROPERTY IS OCCUPIED.
7 . WHY CAN'T THE PROPERTY B1'. U1'VI 101'I.0 WI1111N Till'. -REQUIREMENTS
or THE ORD I NANCE? THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE NORTHERN PERIMETER
OF SUPERIOR'S BOUNDARY LINE ALONG S.W. 29TH STREET IS PRESENTLY UNDEVELOPED
AND DOES NOT GENERATE ANY FOOT TRAFFIC. WE FEEL THAT SINCE NO FOOT TRAFFIC
USES S.W. 29TH STREET, WE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO DEFER CONSTRUCTION OF A
WALKWAY FOR•TWO YEARS.:OR UNTIL.ADJACENT PROPERTY IS OCCUPIED.
8 . WHAT SPECIAL CI IECf1MSTANCI.S Ou (.ONO I I I ONS APPLY 10 SUBJECT
PROPERTY WHICH ARE PECULIAR '1'O sIICt1 PROPERTY AND DO NO1
APPLY GENERALLY TO PROPERTY IN !HI NEIGHBORHOOD
ADJACENT PROPERTY IS UNDEVELOPED. (SEE ENCLOSED PHOTOS.)
9 . IS THE VARIANCE REQUESTED THE MINIMUM VARIANCE NECESSARY TO
ALLOW THE REASONABLE . USE OF T!'!t: PROPERTY?YES
10 . WILL THE GRANTING OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE BE IN HARMONY
WITH THE DEVELOPMI:NI OF. SURROUNDING PROPERTY AND NOT INJU-
RIOUS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC
WELFARE? ' YES
I OF GLARE THAT I AM Tllh OWNI u (U vIt()I'I. IlIl' INVOLVED IN THIS
APPLICATION AND THA I T111' 1 (1RI (.O1 N4. S I A l LMt.NTS AND ANSWERS
HEREIN CONTAINED AND TllE INFORMAL ION IILREWITI( SUBMITTED ARE
IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND COuUFC I 10 THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
AND BELIEF .
ti
WA t Uith OF APPL 1 C
NOTE: REQUIREMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SIDEWALK ON S.W. 34TH I_ B ING
COMPLIED WITH AT THIS TIME.
I
Q•_,_,, ,
c'
Cld.••••
3"-- - —
10
c.,
0-
s•
1
0-
0
o-
0
c'S •
ZS- •-
s.,
V.,
114, •
V4•
II.
I
t,
I
110.
0.
1.
1.....••
2
3
Cvv7
a/
ity
i•-)
W
01.
11A <---
j5-
93
be /
A '
s
i. .
t.
i .
c-
N. ,
S'
t
IV '•
1
4
r
5
c: .
ameresocaaa=
7
k..
f-
i.-
4,.. . '.
7.. •
kl
1 "
64 'ic. '‘•
4"
N, ,,.
p, ...•
1/4'
1
i
i
kakf
0
111/4r• -
h..)..
ii
li ...•
r4, ,
s,
4,
1%.
g.,,,,. • .
v.•
c
ic..
R._
i.• •
i,•. ,, , ,
it,
V
11
Nel\
v‘
5
a• •.
s3 ;',....
i••
14 .
4.-. . .. ,
1',. .
if. ••'
t . .'
te.
t
1\ /),
t
4•,; • • • '
fa-
1
0 •.
3
v ..- ..,,,,
Acrs. .
t
i•
t• :,,, • : .. . ,ts,
t
1; , ...... :,,,
o...„(,...
i.,..;:,
2,
44;
ie
c-
1''‘
I
t; . ...
r
4,
4,-''';.
1•
1:'...
a:
4'.
1/
1;
a
T.
Ns`
a : : .
31 ,
1'',..
41•
4::$
9,
g,.
frl
k)
tti • •••••••— '
id '
V)
I.
c..:
1 •
i
i
i; '‘..)
r ?.. .#/.. .
44;
6;
4/•,
4
V.
i
Iztli/C.
Z
a ..
A.. ,
Q _
tl
i
v):, .
L :
ifr.....?
e•
i/
Y-_(:,:
t•
i4,4,
t,'" * ,, .
L,.--.. .‘• .,,,
R.„
w,.. .-.
ilk ,.•
4.•,‘..
1
1
i
I
t,
l,
i !',',
4:• .,,
L. ‘
A/•
e.?./.(
Vic.;'::.
4e7.
3. . ••
pt, -
v. • . - .
k..).
r--
s,
1;•,,
r.;.,,. /
9! .
44.
7 .•,,
i1'.
1 .'••••
Jr0:?
c,"
7-:',
V...'" .. ..,'',
7--,..
tt.'-.. • •••• .., . ...;•:...,... ;:•-•:..--, ;
1
i.
ki . ..
ti ,„...1
r.'
I
0.;,•,,
I.;.
4: :
46!
talk,
l''
IQ.
c•
Zia ‘
zskaa
i' :....—...
f
Q./
3
1_,.;. ••., ,''‘
P
21•, •
3
7„, •
r
J
r..
I.
4. .. .•;• - • .
K
v
I
l'
ft ..,(
a ; : . •... •
1
I'
ll•
i,
t;
r; .; ' ,' •
I
i:.',
t:'-'
4•
4•:.
i.
i.:,. ‘.., . . •:.
1c •
1
i ..:•
t.,
4.
g.
4 .
f)
A/
42/
vvzry
t.,
5 . .......... .
t,..'. , ...... •
1,.‘„,,
1.,...... ,,, .
c.,
1%...•
1
1 .,. .,,•
i.
tO
6..,...„....
3.....
0 •
t...„.
t., _ .
at,
t ..,.,
r • ....;
oH"..( .._:_______;
a.
h..._ .:.....----- ,
4. •
4c;
1.. .,,:
o.
i. ,' .,.. . .•
9N4l/
vi>
1.
7, )
b. ...•
1 ... •
1 •. •
7
IP
S.,
1.
7i.
44
I • ',
a
i •
114,
414.."
Ii-...(•''',......,
l
1' • •
4.••••;...•
i
s,
a‘.
4, ;!•".
4:
1-'
a:,.. .• .. . •
f!. •
ja. ..•.
1-‘,.*,:.
41'
N.......•
d1.;
14.
4•
1 ..,
1 %
iv....•
f':.
s•
I
i
7".'
1.. 4:
11/..' ? . •
It
1,
44A.
1.
aio
1;...;
4.•,.....,,,,..,..,,,.,..,,,
t...,. • ....,.. ,.. „,;.•,,,•;; • .•, .
0...,:
v,..
44:;
1•;:•,.'
1::,•,.,,,':
7 • • ,...
i.
i: -.„.-
tk ......
i.
i
1. •,,, ., ,,.. .
4.. , .
ay..
t•,.....••••-'
t.
e''.
1
t ::
1. :,;
S-
I•''' , . .
nhito,..
7 : •.,':
4 •
1
1.
I.< •
It* .' .'• : ?•
4 •'' .. • •••
l•..
t. • •.
1,
i144
i...' '
ti•,.• • ,. •„
I. • .
e • ' '.• , , .
1
afig
i.
VV%
ialls14.
1.• ,.
A. •, : * '
i'• •.• • ...
I.
0
t
4.
A
A:
41
v
11.•* •••..;,
1 • ,
I
I..
144;.
t.
et
44'.
t.....
1" • .
I
Ivi •,
1 .°
V.:: ,.'...• '•.
1‘•••‘
C.:•
et\•'•
1 - ' •
mgr....
a
i ..
A '
T....•':
Z.
1.; •
I".
1.'
II•.
I;•:
i• ,,•, ; •
41. . .,,. •
I'••• .
a:
Y..
V; . •
I.
4
t •
I.1
j .
S .. • ,
h '
t
411>,... .-
i'----•
AmII
OF RA,41
tb © THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
o ammo BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
co
FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593
091 7'E0
January 30, 1980
Mr. Bruce C. Olsen
Consulting Engineer
1411 4th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
RE: File No. SA-452-79; Superior Fast Freight Site Approval.
Dear Mr. Olsen:
This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was
approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of
January 15, 1980, has not been appealed within the time period
established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is
considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective
this date for permanent filing.
If you require additional information regarding this matter, please
do not hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
CFred J Kaufman
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department
City Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King
Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon
oath disposes and states:
That on the 15th day of January 19 80 , affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope
containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid,
addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled
application or petition.
Subscribed and sworn this day of )2\ou do
19
Notary Public in and for t. State
of Washington, residing at Renton
Application, Petition or Case: Superior Fast Freight; SA-452-79
The mtnwte4 contain a £.i,a.t o6 the paAti.ea o6 necond
Y
January 15, 1980
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION .
APPLICANT: Superior Fast Freight FILE NO. SA-452-79
LOCATION: Vicinity of 400 S.W. 34th Street.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site approval for a truck and trailer
mechanical maintenance facility in an M-P zone.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions.
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by
REPORT: the Examiner on January 4, 1980.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application, and field
checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner
conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on January 8, 1980 at 9:45 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Munic:_pal Building.
Parties wish:_ng to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed
the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following
additional exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #2: Site Plan (entire site)
Exhibit #3: Building Elevations
Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding commencement of construction on the site,
Mr. Blaylock advised that a building permit has not yet been issued. He also noted a
typographica=_ error in Section I.2, Population/Employment, of Exhibit #1, which states
that the proposed building will contain 7,860 square feet, and corrected it to 7,680
square feet.
The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was:
Bruce C. Olsen
Consulting Engineer
1411 4th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Mr. Olsen advised that previously requested reduction of landscaping area in the first
phase of development, File No. SA-202-78, is no longer being pursued and the applicant
intends to conform to required landscaping conditions which establish the east buffer
zone at a width of 10 feet. Mr. Blaylock indicated his opinion that the buffer area
is currently less than 10 feet and should be measured to assure compliance.
The Examiner referenced Section 4-730.030.3, Manufacturing Park District, of the Zoning
Code, and inquired if the requirement has been met on the east property line which states
that no building or structure shall be located closer than twenty (20) feet to any property
line not abutting a street or highway. Mr. Olsen advised that the narrowest setback,
containing 20 feet, exists on the west property line abutting the Burlington Northern
railroad tracks.
Referencing the Planning Department recommendation for bonding of all required improvements .
in Phase I to be included as a condition of approval of the subject application, Mr. Olsen
felt that installation of landscaping could occur during basic construction on the site,
and requested permission to occupy the building prior to completion of the landscape project.
Mr. Blaylock indicated concern regarding issuance of a temporary building permit in lieu
of posting a bond. Responding to the applicant's inquiry regarding progress on the Phase
I project, Mr. Blaylock advised that final inspection had been requested on December 17,
SA-452-79 Page Two
19 9, comments from various city departments are being accumulated, and the Public Works
De«artment should be contacted by the applicant regarding current status of final approval.
Mr Olsen inquired if bonding would apply to the second proposed building. Mr. Blaylock
indicated that Phase I approval had included landscaping proposals for the entire site
in•luding the Phase II project. He noted that although the Building Division has
au.hority to defer the landscaping provision until after occupancy of the building, the
establishment of timing is the responsibility of the Board of Public Works and application
should be made to that body. Mr. Olsen noted that because the second building impinges
on the planting areas on two sides, installation of that portion of landscaping would not
be possible until the building is nearing completion. Mr. Blaylock noted that the previous
site plan had been approved by the Hearing Examiner and could not be modified beyond
li ited substitution of comparable species material. The Examiner indicated that because
the second phase of development impinges upon the previously approved first phase, it
world be possible to permit the Planning Department to provide final approval of the
landscaping plan for the second phase. Mr. Olsen noted that although the landscaping
ar:a to the north of the new building has not been reduced, the roadway entry has been
sh fted slightly to the east on 29th Street; however, no other changes have occurred in
th • original site plan.
Th- Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was
no response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department. Since there
we e no further comments, the hearing regarding File No. SA-452-79 was closed by the
Ex; iner at 10:07 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner
no makes and enters the following:
FI+ DINGS:
1. The request is for approval of a site plan for an additional 7,680 square foot
building on a previously developed +6 acre parcel.
2. The Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and
provisions, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is entered as
Exhibit #1.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance
has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official.
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed.
6. Utility improvements are required by the Fire Department and the Public Works
Department.
7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height
requirements of Section 4-730 (M-P; Manufacturing Park) of Title IV, Ordinance No.
1628, Code of General Ordinances.
8. The subject property is located in the vicinity of the 400 block of S.W. 34th Street.
The subject site is zoned M-P and pursuant to Section 4-730.040.9, the site plan
must be approved by the Hearing Examiner.
9. The site is generally level. The applicant has previously constructed a terminal
facility on the site and this large structure dominates the subject property. The
proposed building will be 7,680 square feet and will lie on the northernmost portion
of the subject property just south of S.W. 29th Street, The new structure will
contain a truck and trailer maintenance facility.
10. The subject site was the subject of a site review when the existing facility was
proposed and the applicant has not yet complied with the terms of the previous
approval (SA-202-78) . These conditions applied to landscape and buffering of
property boundaries.
The applicant indicated that the new proposal will interfere to some extent with
landscaping as previously approved because of on-going construction.
11. The applicant indicated that they have not reduced the perimeter landscaping which
is required by Section 4-730.030.2.
SA-452-79 Page Three
12. The Planning Department recommended that the exterior treatment of the proposed
building snatch that of the existing building for consistency of design.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposed addition to the subject property is compatible with the M-P zoning
of the subject site. The project is also compatible with the designation of the
site for manufacturing type uses by the Comprehensive Plan and the Green River
Valley Comprehensive Plan.
2. The applicant indicated that they intend to comply with the various landscape
requirements of both the city ordinances and those imposed by the previous site
approval (SA--202-78) ; this includes the perimeter landscaping on the north and
east sides of the subject property.
Installation of the required landscaping for both Phase I and this phase, Phase II,
will be required and a bond will be required to assure compliance with these
conditions.
3. The utility requirements and improvements shall be subject to approval by both the
Fire and Public Works Departments.
4. In order to assure compliance with the goals and objectives of the Green River
Comprehensive Plan, the exterior treatment of the new facility should be compatible
with the existing facility. The Planning Department should be contacted and that
department's approval will be required to assure compliance.
DECISION:
Exhibit #2 is approved subject to:
1. The installation of landscaping subject to the approval of the Planning Department
and the posting of a bond in the amount of 150% of the amount of such installation
incomplete at the time of final inspection and prior to issuance of an occupancy
permit.
2. Approval of the Public Works and Fire Departments of required utility improvements.
3. Approval by the Planning Department of the exterior treatment of the proposal.
4. Compliance with the conditions of the previous site approval, File No. SA-202-78.
ORDERED THIS 15th day of January, 1980.
Fred J. Ka man
Land Use Hearing Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 15th day of January, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party
of record:
Bruce C. Olsen, Consulting Engineer, 1411 4th Ave. , Seattle WA
98101
TRANSMIT':"'ED THIS 15th day of January, 1980 to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman
Ron Nelson, Building Division
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before January 29, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error
in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at
the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen
14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the
specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the
record, take further action as he deems proper.
SA-452-79 Page Four
Au appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that
s ch appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting
o her specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in
t, e Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in
s. id department.
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JA N 81980
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER AM P
PUBLIC HEARING 7,8,9110,11112,1,213,4,51
JANUARY 8 , 1980
APPLICANT: SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT
FILE NUMBER: SA-452-79 EXHIBIT NO.
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: ITEM NO. V- 7 9
The applicant requests site approval for a truck and trailer mechani-
cal maintenance facility in an M-P zone.
B . GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner of Record BRUCE OLSEN FOR SUPERIOR FAST
FREIGHT, INC.
2. Applicant : SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT
3. Location: Vicinity of 400 S.W. 34th Street .
Vicinity map attached)
4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is
available on file in the Renton
Planning Department .
5. Size of Property: 6 acres
6. Access: Via S.W. 29th Street .
7 . Existing Zoning: M-P , Manufacturing Park
8. Existing Zoning in the M-P, Manufacturing Park
Area:
9. Comprehensive Land Use Manufacturing Park
Plan:
10 . Notification: The applicant was notified in writing
of the hearing date. Notice was
properly published in the Record
Chronicle on December 28, 1979 , and
posted in three places on or near
the site as required by City ordinance
on December 20 , 1979 .
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 on
April 14, 1959 . The site was filled in 1975 ( file No. SP-822-75) ,
rezoned by Ordinance 2992 on March 10 , 1976 , and platted per final
plat approved July 17 , 1978.
D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1. Topography: The site is generally level.
2. Soils : Snohomish silt loam (So) , permeability is moderate
in the upper part of the profile and moderately rapid in the
lower part ; runoff is slow; and the erosion hazard is slight.
This soil is used for row crops, pasture, and hay.
3. Vegetation: The only significant vegetation on site is scrub
brush and grass.
4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation may provide some habitat
for birds and small mammals.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
JANUARY 8, 1980
PAGE TWO
5. Water: Standing water was observed on the subject site
December 20, 1979) . It is subject to seasonal high water
table.
6. Land Use: The property adjacent to the east has been approved
for a facility similar to the subject request . The properties
north, south, and west remain undeveloped. To the east across
the East, Valley Road are located several businesses.
E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
The properties in the vicinity are experiencing a transition from
undeveloped land to commercial/industrial uses of light industrial/
manufacturing park nature.
F. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Water and Sewer: An existing 12" main runs north-south along
the East Valley Road within 1/4 mile to the east of the subject
site and a 12" main extends east-west within 1/4 mile to the
north and a 24" main runs north-south along Lind Avenue to
the west . Along the East Valley Road within 1/4 mile to the
east of the site exists an 8" sanitary sewer which eventually
becomes a 24" pipe.
2. Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Fire DepartmLnt as
per ordinance requirements.
3. Transit : Metro Transit Route 150 operates along SR-167 within
1/4 mile to the east of the subject site.
4. Schools: Not applicable.
5. Recreation: Not applicable.
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1. Section 4-730, Manufacturing Park.
H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS:
1. Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June, 1976 .
I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT:
1. Natural Systems: Natural systems on the site have been dis-
turbed by previous development . The subject proposal will
increase storm water runoff and raise traffic and noise levels
in the area. Through proper development controls and proce-
dures , however , these impacts can be mitigated.
2. Population/Employment : The nature of the use is such that
there isn ' t likely to be any significant change in population.
However, completion of the facilities will provide approxi-
mately 9 additional employment opportunities ( 1. 2 employees/
1000 square feet on a 7, 860 square foot building) .
3. Schools : Not applicable.
4. Social : Not applicable.
5. Traffic: The proposed truck and trailer maintenance facility will
generate approximately 400 additional vehicle trips per day
3. 68 trips per 1000 square feet + 374 trips) .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
JANUARY 8, 1980
PAGE THREE
J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the
State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCN 43-21C,
a declaration of negative impact has been issued for the subject
proposal. This declaration is further based on the provision of
suitable landscaping, screening, and other development standards
which reduce visual and other impacts of the development and
are consistent with M-P zone standards and Comprehensive Plan
objectives.
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1. City of Renton Building Division
2. City of Renton Engineering Division
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division
4. City of Renton Utilities Division
5 . City of Renton Fire Department
L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Element , which designates the site and surrounding
area as Manufacturing Park.
2. The applicant proposes to construct a ±7,680 square foot
equipment maintenance building on a ±6 acre site located at
400 S.W. 34th Street . This proposal will serve the existing
freight receiving and distribution facility on the site.
3. The proposed maintenance facility is consistent with the
Manufacturing Park zone permitted uses, setbacks, landscaping,
and other requirements. However, the applicant has not to
date complied with the site and landscaping plans approved
by the Hearing Examiner for the freight receiving and distri-
bution facility. Specifically, the landscaping buffer on the
east side has been reduced from the approved 10 feet to 5
feet . Also, the interior planting island at the south side
entrance has been reduced. These amendments are not permitted
without prior approval of the Examiner and the Planning Depart-
ment .
4. The proposed site plan and landscaping area is consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan objectives and the requirements of Reso-
lution 1923 between the City and the Soil Conservation Service
Comprehensive Plan , Green River Valley, June 1976, valley and
site objectives, pp. 5-8) .
5. Any required utility improvements shall be coordinated with and
approved by the Public Works and Fire Departments.
6. Building exterior treatment and color shall be consistent with
the existing structures and compatible with M-P zone require-
ments and Comprehensive Plan objectives subject to Planning
Department approval (Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan
objectives, June 1976) .
7. The maximum proposed height of the building is approximately
23 feet , which is consistent with the height requirements
of the M-P zone.
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS:
Recommend approval of the proposed site plan, SA-452-79 , based on
the above analysis subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the approved site and landscaping plans as
approved by the Hearing Examiner for SA-202-78 as per #3.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
JANUARY 8, 1980
PAGE FOUR
2. Final Planning Department approval of detailed landscape
plans for the new addition.
3. Provision of suitable utilities as per Public Works and Fire
Departments' approval.
4. Final Planning Department approval of building exterior treat-
ment , design , and color as per #6.
5. All of the required improvements in Phase I as approved in
file number SA-202-78 that are not completed and accepted
by the City of Renton prior to the issuance of a building
permit for the mechanics shop (Phase II ) shall be bonded
for 150% of the estimated value.
A
igell\
Fr'SUP6R:oR Fc 7Z N
R IGNT TCi[MIN4L F N1-P o
3 M r'
N 1.,MO av
M P In
NAP a
a,
N
1
i
l
j
j
i
r
PyURLiNGTOwI 1.10R,T14E4ZAI MAIN UNL
J_
i
ik..WEST VA.iLRY -
1,,l
4.411, v- fr\-\--- 1111141,
VICINTY MAP i° - ices
t
1
1
I
F, ,• ,
i7zT:[i11...li'
sue—•- ;;”. ,.i ..•--n
I
1 i
f.
q i 1
1_ \,t....r
I — — \ - -... 1 ‘—. 4v
el
SRC
f' 4
r r• — - ---- --•— -- --
I
e ,•"- a { : 17 t• f - e^
I I I I I I1
r ..• . I-"::NA T--t i . '
i
96OcbeI, •. • •, •I•f •
1.
0 7a e I 1• .y ..'s1 -
11 a 1
T , 1- 1T- I f iis':
st a •o •, e -
I
I. {_i. L 1 I
I '' • 11III /i
I
7 :--, '
P 'l
Y
7
2'
t.)
1:1 I L-I . A,
1:L.
L---
I SITE APPROVAL: SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT
a raw..E,-Snca sc c-u:ma scam-vn,ai.!
APPLICANT SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT TOTAL AREA ±6 acres
PRINCIPAL ACCESS ' Via S.W. 29th St.
EXISTING ZONING M-P, Manufacturing1Park
I. EXISTING USE Truck Freight Terminal
ii PROPOSED USE Truck & trailer mechanical maintenance facility
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park
COMMENTS
f:
J. a
f
I
v8 0 I 96-0 . 32-0-1 /0G-0- v;
I
PRCF y ,.r /E 14E5.95' t
II IIIIIlIIIIlII1IIIIIII1I I III , I I i I 1 ff
t,r E corgi t1
I •
it rl.triT/i:v m
NEW £QL/IPn1f/:7
Q Lolly?E!!h"J re PL06../
F.cXC C CV /E.So' R il
J^„i//•iG . I
II ICI ICI i III ' III'
N.
S / TE PLA1U 0
LEGAL D.CP_/PT/ A/ 5://L.1/'vf :YF6: -Y-/,! P'LLY$r. ,4,/KL5
e-,c u;--:;:JCY- /I-4 p`I;? ;IA.2. 56
T— C75 S 8 AGGC< / rs/i-ii•:
K_r
F r EJ L/ti nic.crnfcni aRiudA
Zr/ /E: /'1-
f+,C cri C,`- 'LJ Lt'/. -!' 7,G 'J -F-
g»r 'i;- /i. >T' `r.
JL/f, 5rA G.: T3&'EYS : 4.'5r15
Renton Planning Department 42/5/79'
DEVE_..VENT APPLICATIOPJ REVIEW _ET
Appl i cat ion :. 5/T AiVOI-- '..
r
Location : .s.4 1r .'n,c.c <SG'7 , y _ ,-, _vGe/"c;'1' &•'C-S?! .k.S.6",. c, .S
tlppl icant : ...5r7 r4,9,4,- ict.s D7 1 L
TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :, ///8/90
Police Department A, R, C, MEETING /rR/ /77
Public M_orks Department
i„#,Engineering Division
Traffic Engineering
Building Division
Utilities Engineering
Fire Department
C(17NTS
I
G yST INS Ri=GA{lpI JG HIS UPI 'CATIONSHOULD 3 ; 'ROVIDEDI,EU 1 ,G H)R TAE E P LI CAl IO , REV EW CU F _REN ,E (ARC) 10 BE HELD ONs' ^,. ~'.
11- l :)) AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONF ERENCELE
r\,'u; ., IF YOOR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE AISLE TOAT.4:NR THE ARC) ,Pt EASE PROVIDE THE COMhmE=NiS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENTDV5:00 PM ON k 4W_'q
REVIEl1IP,G DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: —_—C----.
i.-----
Anproved Approved with conditions Not Approved
r
c . -
r-
1 L :
V I / 79SinaoeofDireco• orIuthoizecersentative Date
REVILUING DEPARTMENT/DIVISI4N ._ __ ____p __
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
d
E-
Date
Sicnatur-- or Director or lluthorized {Zepresentative
REVIEl: ING DEL 1'ART ML^lT/DivisION :_----.___------------- -- . .—
t,f p•o` e{ Annrored with conditions Not Approved
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW gIEET
Application : (S/TE WO ',4, 5 SA-7 j1 o , V at 7` v /Teo,r'
utPc.!Q K/e011 Peeli/174s wre c.e-1cre/// / ) It ci pi /f'/ 30.i ei •
Location : E. .Sidit, al 1 s'"el Xve c.ceVje-{e<., 4.5-Gt/079 --'s ' sSlc-.-,-c•t
Appi i cant : St, pepi fr- EctS7Ltey%f
TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: WPC
Police Department A. R. C, MEETING k2/24/77
Public Works Departr•- A
Engineering Division
Traffic Engineering
Building`"Division
tC ttTilitiesEngineering
Fire Department
q7111:7AIRTAREINIMPAscERRIMAPPi8 E RDD
o
THIFRO E EROLM, YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTAIVEWLLNOT BEABLETO
ATT N11 THE ARC, I,EA E PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENTBY5:UD PM ON / //Qf77
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ._.' _ t•r,^-_ ^
a=
s. Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
i
Signature of Director or Authorized ;Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Lf7 .17 ,'6tf'.
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
1i
11/,/_2) b p. `-.%":,(,_1, '7,,:-
Tignature o/f Director or Authorized Representative Date
Renton dlanning Department
DEVEL., MENT APPLICATIOPN REVIEW SIILLT
Application :_ ( /rE /910,0,49, C_ s VSa-'gyp F
ftic'eAa
1
irre1i/4/r.•re. e<'- j // i v T`"_s nC7Nt P
Location S'l < ("t G .'r=el' jam``'c_c.c c .y ,,• 6--Gc/"a?9 e""
t'c7! F
p p l i c a n t :_S{i r G r l s Z77-ry
L
TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:, I/$f8o
Police Department A. R. C. MEETING /0//2 /77
Public Works Department
Engipeerinq Division
lraffic Engineering C)
Building Division
i v
Utilities Engineering i
Fire Department
IN fmill P
UNTS GaFO RG1HE APPLICATIONIREVIEW
THIS CONFERENCEGr(ARC)GH O BE LDIOFD
1 —Al 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE
F YOUR DEPARTMENT/L'IVISIoN REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TOATTNTHEARC, EASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENTBYI:UD PM ON 'c0(}/ i
REVILWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
Scnafiure of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:_. t-.`Js _:
1Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
Da eDirectororAuthorisedRepresentativStuntatzreof
e
REVIEWING [}EPARTMENT/DIVISION :_.____-- _-.-
Not Approved
Approved approved with condition,
Y ,,, :
3'/F I NAI ECLARAT I ON OF JON—SIGNIFICANCE
Application No .SA-452-79 PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No . F'ECF-524-79 FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal _ Approximate 8 ,000 square foot truck and
trailer mechanical maintenance facility.
Proponent SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT
South side of S.W. 34th St . approximately 550
Location of Proposal feet west of East Valley Road .
Lead Agency IZENTON_PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal has been determined to 0 have r not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS is
is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was
ma•e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
NON'
Reasons for declaration of environmental,% significance :
This declaration is based on the provision of suitable landscaping ,
screening, and other developmental standards which will reduce the
visual impacts of the development and insure consistency with the
manufacturing park zone, the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan
objectives , and Resolution 1923.
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( final )
declaration of non- significance :
Responsible Of ' )ial David R. Clemens
Title S nior P , nne Date January 4 , 1980
Signature 1/1;-",e
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
JANUARY 8, 1980
APPLICANT: SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT
FILE NUMBER: SA-452-79
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The applicant requests site approval for a truck and trailer mechani-
cal maintenance facility in an M-P zone.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner of Record BRUCE OLSEN FOR SUPERIOR FAST
FREIGHT, INC.
2. Applicant : SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT
3. Location: Vicinity of 400 S. W. 34th Street .
Vicinity map attached)
4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is
available on file in the Renton
Planning Department .
5. Size of Property: 6 acres
6 . Access: Via S.W. 29th Street .
7. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park
8. Existing Zoning in the M-P, Manufacturing Park
Area:
9. Comprehensive Land Use Manufacturing Park
Plan:
10 . Notification: The applicant was notified in writing
of the hearing date. Notice was
properly published in the Record
Chronicle on December 28, 1979 , and
posted in three places on or near
the site as required by City ordinance
on December 20, 1979 .
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 on
April 14, 1959 . The site was filled in 1975 ( file No. SP-822-75) ,
rezoned by Ordinance 2992 on March 10, 1976, and platted per final
plat approved July 17, 1978.
D. PHYSICAAL BACKGROUND:
1. Topography: The site is generally level.
2. Soils: Snohomish silt loam (So) , permeability is moderate
in the upper part of the profile and moderately rapid in the
lower part ; runoff is slow; and the erosion hazard is slight.
This soil is used for row crops, pasture, and hay.
3. Vegetation: The only significant vegetation on site is scrub
brush and grass.
4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation may provide some habitat
for birds and small mammals.
t
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO TIIE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
JANUARY 8, 1980
PAGE TWO
5. Water: Standing water was observed on the subject site
December 20, 1979) . It is subject to seasonal high water
table.
6. Land Use: The property adjacent to the east has been approved
for a facility similar to the subject request . The properties
north, south, and west remain undeveloped. To the east across
the East Valley Road are located several businesses.
E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
The properties in the vicinity are experiencing a transition from
undeveloped land to commercial/industrial uses of light industrial/
manufacturing park nature.
F. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Water and Sewer: An existing 12" main runs north-south along
the East Valley Road within 1/4 mile to the east of the subject
site and a 12" main extends east-west within 1/4 mile to the
north and a 24" main runs north-south along Lind Avenue to
the west . Along the East Valley Road within 1/4 mile to the
east of the site exists an 8" sanitary sewer which eventually
becomes a 24" pipe.
2. Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Fire Department as
per ordinance requirements.
3. Transit : Metro Transit Route 150 operates along SR-167 within
1/4 mile to the east of the subject site.
4. Schools: Not applicable.
5. Recreation: Not applicable.
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1. Section 4-730, Manufacturing Park.
H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS:
1. Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June, 1976.
I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT:
1. Natural Systems: Natural systems on the site have been dis-
turbed by previous development . The subject proposal will
increase storm water runoff and raise traffic and noise levels
in the area. Through proper development controls and proce-
dures, however , these impacts can be mitigated.
2. Population/Employment : The nature of the use is such that
there isn' t likely to be any significant change in population.
However, completion of the facilities will provide approxi-
mately 9 additional employment opportunities ( 1. 2 employees/
1000 square feet on a 7, 860 square foot building) .
3. Schools : Not applicable.
4. Social : Not applicable.
5. Traffic: The proposed truck and trailer maintenance facility will
generate approximately 400 additional vehicle trips per day
3.68 trips per 1000 square feet + 374 trips) .
4
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
JANUARY 8, 1980
PAGE THREE
J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the
State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C,
a declaration of negative impact has been issued for the subject
proposal. This declaration is further based on the provision of
suitable landscaping , screening, and other development standards
which reduce visual and other impacts of the development and
are consistent with M-P zone standards and Comprehensive Plan
objectives.
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1. City of Renton Building Division
2. City of Renton Engineering Division
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division
4. City of Renton Utilities Division
5. City of Renton Fire Department
L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Element , which designates the site and surrounding
area as Manufacturing Park.
2. The applicant proposes to construct a ±7, 680 square foot
equipment maintenance building on a ±6 acre site located at
400 S.W. 34th Street . This proposal will serve the existing
freight receiving and distribution facility on the site.
3. The proposed maintenance facility is consistent with the
Manufacturing Park zone permitted uses, setbacks, landscaping,
and other requirements. However, the applicant has not to
date complied with the site and landscaping plans approved
by the Hearing Examiner for the freight receiving and distri-
bution facility. Specifically, the landscaping buffer on the
east side has been reduced from the approved 10 feet to 5
feet . Also, the interior planting island at the south side
entrance has been reduced. These amendments are not permitted
without prior approval of the Examiner and the Planning Depart-
ment .
4. The proposed site plan and landscaping area is consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan objectives and the requirements of Reso-
lution 1923 between the City and the Soil Conservation Service
Comprehensive Plan, Green River Valley, June 1976 , valley and
site objectives, pp. 5-8) .
5. Any required utility improvements shall be coordinated with and
approved by the Public Works and Fire Departments.
6. Building exterior treatment and color shall be consistent with
the existing structures and compatible with M-P zone require-
ments and Comprehensive Plan objectives subject to Planning
Department approval (Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan
objectives, June 1976) .
7. The maximum proposed height of the building is approximately
23 feet , which is consistent with the height requirements
of the M-P zone.
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS:
Recommend approval of the proposed site plan, SA-452-79 , based on
the above analysis subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the approved site and landscaping plans as
approved by the Hearing Examiner for SA-202-78 as per #3.
V
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
JANUARY 8, 1980
PAGE FOUR
2. Final Planning Department approval of detailed landscape
plans for the new addition.
3. Provision of suitable utilities as per Public Works and Fire
Departments' approval.
4. Final Planning Department approval of building exterior treat-
ment, design, and color as per #6.
5. All of the required improvements in Phase I as approved in
file number SA-202-78 that are not completed and accepted
by the City of Renton prior to the issuance of a building
permit for the mechanics shop (Phase II) shall be bonded
for 150% of the estimated value.
I
rr
r ilk r"
ob .'
A .0 ':
P•"V
z, •,
14413MAIAR is 11
1,I 1 s u rsI'.
G 'iH
rd
0LHH1 SR-1
p . , . , ,,z. „ ..I . _ . . .,4
1 ' 1 .. iIi - TO- l
a.'., 4. N 44 Na 4 $.0 59 .. +96O , ah
1I1..., ,,
f
I I
I
I
I Ij1 _ I. L 1 I
1 -
I
j ,%,
i p..1
1 1 I
L- i
L___
I
SITE APPROVAL: SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT
1 A.,.. m.. r
APPLICANT SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT TOTAL AREA ±6 acres_—
1 PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via S.W. 29th St.
EXISTING ZONING M-P, Manufacturing' Park
EXISTING USE Truck Freight Terminal
PROPOSED USE Truck & trailer mechanical maintenance facility
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park
I
COMMENTS
111', _ 6a.5T VALUIY r'.c0o
I l
M P
6up62 0R F,oT FPR{11GNT TGg1d1 v4L/ F MP n
H
j
t.,w10 A.M.
M P
MP i
a
Vor.
e.'
i
It
P.puRL1NGTD1.1 NORTFIEiZN MA1N UNE
7—
A---,
7--"""":"=N WHST VOi.LMY - -
y
jN.44.401,
VICINTY MAP r - i«o'
a-
I
r
6g' w C i 9G-O .',2-0 I /00-O c/1
j(N.rly Dii [i. I iii1
9sPR ,SCF TY U BS.NE /C I I Ic
Ili ' li ( Iiilii : llllli ,lil . l ; , i I
LT5 Lori +
1. !
I
I I J '1 c
I s I
rz,vi rpvG a 9 o'
r \ I f1I
N5r/ti0''/C. ... :c r
NEW £„^U/Pn9FNr
1 /V71-N/.'w re 13L06../' i
A-'PwAGT F si//:G—.--- { CC)VC. i6- - / PLA.v'//yG "/ N,
j I I I ! j l i i i l 1 1 j ' I i I I l l I ' f:
T -I I 1 ,
I ; ! i unto V
i N
5 l 7T E PL A JV 41-110 0
LEGAL G.CP_;GT/G/v• 5:ILOI1 TYPE: y-J4 ''LLy$171;;JKLEL'
F 12 Er GHT- ACTS 5f 5 , ?LOG.< I , rVirri,,v
r;<-i'P4i CY. f1-4 RE;--A;. 6/I='l-SC
ZFrCIA, ^./ n/c.er/,cN OR/L A
J/fE: /-1--:
n
c C- 7 : : 9,7/6•%/V.51ON /. t it 5/,
fi,47c'.; a- !III/L L v :'' 7G. .2 4/
e 9:2r A/_r-; f/, >7. s•'
0P,955/: G,--- i k'E ' , 'c
Renton Planning Department 47 3/77
f• DEV"rJP ENT APPLICATION REVIEW MEET
Application . /TE- ZersO!/, y... 151lre,ch.
fileeA 4 K ( N?eti/t 7('•N r si e-//i 7 ) j : m /I [ D ri e -
L o c a t ion : E. idiv M•rJ/ fre.SGt 1e14- -6Lt/a?9'"'s-7!
Applicant : ,54,./+grior r s7`74//
TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : //8/ O
Police Department A, R, C, MEETING la/2e/77
Public®jarks Department
p/Engineering Division
Traffic Engineering
Building Division
Utilities Engineering
Fire Department
cONJR 11;r,TINS t] FRORTHETAPLICATIO\IIREViLN CUVFERENCEUr(A
SHOULD))
1 BE pp
HELD
o
II LI ON
7 J AT 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCEiaJ1 „ 1F YOUR DEPARTMEN17DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TOEABLETOATTNTHEARC, P EASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENTBY3:UO PM ON /a 7(7
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DLVISION :
or -_— — ---- --- ---
x Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
Signature of Director or uthorizec. Re resentative Date
B Y 3' U U t'M U IV icy//y •1 - T`— ,,.
y.»
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
A roved with conditions Not Approved
Approved Approved
I
Signature o fDirector or Authorised Representative
REVIEWLNG DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :_
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
ic4/.J/ /7
DEVE. - -TENT APPLICATION REVIEW ; ET
Application : s.5/TE 5?' VS01-79) fdrat74r0ck a. 7/ea.:lc-.- -
Pie eAA Hleo'.i /1,1aift74No•.+ c.e 1 t yl lL Q M .41- ed it e -
Location : £ ..5-i 4 p et 1,• )Afre.Se4 J4.7i41,e< SGt/'o?9 -_,S7! f.S4i3'c.S3
Applicant : Svlrprivr ij7 y ey,
L_
TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:, 449/4'90
Police Department A. R. C. MEETING /a/2e/77
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
Traffic Engineering
Building Division
tilities Engineering
Fire Department
INrIWRIITIP GPF(S.
RGTHETAPPLICATION REVIEWS CONFERENCEOr(ARC)) TO BE HELDIONDof7? AT 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFEREN CERUUM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO
ATT NID THE ARC, LL,EA E PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BY 5:UO PM ON /6Z//9/79
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: :TT-
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
Q 0// /
Signature of Director or Authorizetl /Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1 orric17Y 42c`'P77
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
S/ - iq,dP20,4-c I`if/:
7/1) X /)1 L' 4/7
Signature olf Directoror Author zored- Representative Date
Renton Planning Department a 3/77
DEVE"?MENT APPLICATION REVIEW of t:ET
Application : $/T 1tzs0z/,4L (.54- VS4-75) /c.;,-a7Ireick 1; i
PIeGtiAKi."1 111c ifl 74fre.or A. cE'4:1ei1 7;Y•ilt ein /7/1-76VOewe e" -
Location : . /46ed1,•nJ,vc-.tSr-f/,/feL,,e. sie/a9 L -7! f.3 ' s,
Applicant : ...Sp/per/Or s/ 7`h//
Parks DepartmentTO : p SCHEDULED HEARIPJG DATE: 4W9e)
Police Department A. R. C. MEETING lc/2r777
Public Works Department
Engi eering Division
raffic Engineering.
49
Building Division
Utilities Engineering
Fire Department
NM NTi HT REGARDING ENCONROH1OE PROVIDEDEALIAORVIEWCONFERE (AC)B HELD
l - oy Al 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE
Nu0 . IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO
ATT NP THE ARC, EA E PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENTBY3:UUPMON f04./9777
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
Y)
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative/ ate
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -,_i
K Approved
Not ApprovedApprovedwithconditions
l•
7,
i' I _.( . 4 if--c-- — V --6 7
Date
5 icincture of Di hector or Authorized Represent.a i ve
REVIE,WWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :_____________
Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved
CLARAT I ON OF ON—SIGNIFICANCE
Application No .SA-452-79 PROPOSED Declaration
IFEnvironmentalChecklistNo . F'ECF-524-79 k„4 FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Approximate 8 ,000 sq nre foot truck and
trailer mechanical maintenance facility.
Proponent SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT
South side of S.W. 34th St . approximately 550LocationofProposalfeetwestofEastValleyRoad .
Lead Agency REM& PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal has been determined to have not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS is
in is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision wasma•e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
Reasons for declaration of environmentalAsignificance :
This declaration is based on the provision of suitable landscaping ,
screening, and other developmental standards which will reduce the
visual impacts of the development and insure consistency with the
manufacturing park zone, the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan
objectives, and Resolution 1923.
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( final )
declaration of non-significance :
Responsible Of • dial David R. Clemens
Title S nior P nne Date January 4, 1980
Signature ' e,f
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
O
OF R4,4
T THE CITY OF RENTON
Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.88055
cZi
AL CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
P,.
235- 2550
94TFO O
SEPI
December 20 , 1979
Bruce C . Olsen , Agent for Superior Fast Freight
1411 4th Avenue
Suite 1420
Seattle , Washington 98101
RE : UOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE
AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO
CONSTRUCT TRUCK AND TRAILER MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE FACILITY
IN M-P , File SA-452-79 ; property located at 400 S .W. 34th St .
Dear Mr . Olsen :
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on November 26 , 1979 A public
hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been
set for January 8 , 1980 at 9 : 00 am
Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present.
All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing .
If you have any further questions , please call the Renton
Planning Department, 235-2550.
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y. Ericksen
Planning Director
By . bk. -
og • r . : .y ,.
Associate Planner
NOTICE
THIS PROPERTY
GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS:
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 400. s.w. 34TH STREET
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON
PLANNING DEPT.
I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF
A PUBLIC HEARING
TO BE HELD
IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING
ON JANUARY 8, 1980 BEGINNING AT 9 :00 AM k.
CONCERNING ITEM Wi
S REZONE
PECIAL PERMIT
SITEAPPROVAL FACI LLI TYR I NTMPRZONEANDI LEANOERSAA 5LE79NC
SUPERIOR FAST FRIEGHT
S WAIVER
FT SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON ,
WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 8 19 SO , AT 9:00 A. M. TO CONSIDER
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS :
1. SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL 1
TO CONSTRUCT CONVENIENCE FOOD STORE IN B-1 ZONE ,
File SA-446-79; property located on the southwest
corner of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and N.E. 4th Street .
2 . A.A.D. INVESTMENT CO. , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM
G TO R-2 AND B-1, File R-457-79; property located
on the southeast corner of Duvall Ave. N.E . and Sunset
Blvd. N.E.
3. A.A.D. INVESTMENT CO. , APPLICATIONS FOR THREE-LOT SHORT
PLAT, File Short Plat 443-79, EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE REGARDING ACCESS , File E-444-79 , and WAIVER OF
OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, File W-445-79; property located on
the southeast corner of Duvall Ave. N.E. and Sunset Blvd.
N.E.
4 . SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT, INC. , APPLICATION FOR SITE
APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT TRUCK AND TRAILER MECHANICAL
MAINTENANCE FACILITY IN M-P ZONE, File SA-452-79; property
located at 400 S.W. 34th St .
Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the
Renton Planning Department .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANAURY 8 , 1980 AT 9 :00 A. M. TO
EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
GORDON Y . ERICKSEN
PUBLISHED December 28, 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
I , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES
OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WIRE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn
to before me, a Notary Public ,
on the ,,,. day of
19 SIGNED At 74*.fAgo%—,
OF R
CITY OF RENTON IECF6 jI;1/
EpAPPLICATIONNOV21s78
SITE APPROVAL
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 2
File No . SA- Q.5-2 r9
Filing Date `ANC' CEP
d
Application Fee $ ./.7a —Receipt No. C`li
Environmental Review Fee $ S . 45 Trx1F-4.-
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :
1 . Name Bruce C. Olsen, Consulting Engr. (Agent for Superior Fast Frgthone 624-7045
Address 1411 4th Avenue, Suite 1420, Seattle, WA 98101
2 . Property location 400 34th S. W., Renton, Washington
3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary)
Lots 5 and 8, Block 1 within Burlington Northern Orillia Industrial Park
of Renton, Division 1 .
4. Number of acres or square feet 6 acres Present zoning M-P
5 . What do you propose to develop on this property?
A truck and trailer mechanical maintenance facility.
6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application :
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks ,
Scale
existing structures , easements , and other
factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20'
B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 '
C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning
on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 '
D. Building height and area (existing and proposed)
7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION :
Date Approved
Date Denied
Date Appealed
Appeal Action
Remarks
Planning Dept.
Rev, 1-77
d A iTl
I UCE C. OLSEN
r
m/4 i 7 (•)i#W1/((-/
411 FO !JRTH AVENUE sEt. T: E, WASJi1 "1GTON 9 ^ 101 206) 624-7045
TRANSMITTAL RECORD
TO City of Renton DATE November 27, 1979
Finance Department JOB Superior Fast Freight
Renton, Washington JOB NUMBER 79024
ATTENTION
We are sending: Herewith Eg Separate Cover by
Drawings prepared by
NO. PRINTS DWG. NO. DESCRIPTION
For Your Use Approved as Noted
Approved Not Approved. Please resubmit.
REMARKS: Check and receipt form enclosed for site approval fees - Total $135
Please return receipt to: Bruce C. Olsen, Consulting Engineer
1411 4th Avenue, Suite 1420
Seattle, Washington 98101
Copy to: BRUCE C. OLSEN, Consulting Engineer
By: ZaA14,#)/A.,Zielif9.1___,,
cEAFFIDAVITRED _IVE D
NOV 26 1979
d............. /
1 , Bruce C. Olsen, agent for Superior Fast Freights Inc. being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief .
Subscribed and sworn before me
this day of e , y e ), 19 .7ci
Notary Public in and for the
Stateat
of
Washington, residing at a;c c c-< _ .
Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner
Bruce C. Olsen, Agent
1411 Fourth Ave. Ste 1420
Address) Address)
Seattle, WA
City) State)
624 - 7045
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of such application .
Date Received 19 By:
Renton Planning Dept .
2-73
Eeuou bTs1.1U717(3 Dec.. •
D g c e b e c e Z n e q n
3onezu7ud ye vTTTud ai 2ncp s'bbTTcgc7ou •
couC U3 co cps Ln Esc suq LeFf?79cTcu2 of ;ye neucou b- 9u11Tud Debsi.cwe c
suq }is2 pceu -onuq €o pe cycx.onAp si q cousbTs;e ?u 6n6Li1 bszcTcnIgL g q co
3,1772 72 co cel.c7 rh cygc cpe 7,o7..eho7uF sbb77c3c ou }3q2 peeu Tuabccce ph uc
cG•iZu IcM1 olA
LOIS OIAIcE n2E ol4rx)
1G:Feb mus
CTcA)2C 6
fllgJL62e) v:ggx.cc';Z,
L 1u6 Ot ytorglA bnp3 r) 2Tdx 'cnLG O O WGL.)
7,ni"1Tc. ..._.r
C •T 2
aviIC:LTi-?FJ: 2MOL11 PC: .<'ik.G WC
2i-T IP-J: 'cGq `1LG Tu -Tyr 7 ,;;abcca 30q ('.OS.I..c;. { '.') "per p(3a, t.
IOT_G 'T.JC1 i :7 u4::G-10t `i f1E+:.C: lu c- OTJ}.g`"JTf (4 i s ` T??t otL:,74::TO
gut ci.J6 Cf> F.. o cp F)i i} G:cc e ? XTA(T) Ag LT.; rj cr.nS rc, 1t)31 -i g
I psTua q6C7 cn s firgc
1
Y OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM pF EST
l;
soi 26 19
r- I
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 1
Application No. 4' Se2-77
NGDPi-,Environmental Checklist No. )5CFr S.25,-1 9 E
PROPOSED, date:FINAL, date :
Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance a Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS:
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent Superior Fast Freight - Bruce C. Olsen, Cons. Engr. (Agent)
2. Acdress and phone number of Proponent:
1411 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1420
Seattle, Washington 98101
Telephone: 624-7045
3. Date Checklist submitted November 26, 1979
4. Agency requiring Checklist Planning Department - Renton
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
Equipment Maintenance Building
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
This building will be 80 feet by 96 feet in enclosed plcn area, having concrete
tilt up enclosing walls. The roof structure will overhang by 5 feet on the west, south
and east sides, and will provide an overhanging cover extending 32 feet on the north
side. The maximum height of the structure will be approximately 23 feet at the ridge.
Mechanical repair of vehicles will be performed wit;iin the building, while repair and
mcintenance of trailers will be performed under the north portion of roof overhang.
The building will be comparable in finish and appearance to the tilt up portion of the
freight terminal which exists on the same site.
Mr
2-
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal ) :
This building is to be constructed at the north end of property presently occupied by
the Superior Fast Freight terminal . This property lies between S. W. 34th St. and
S. W. 29th St., approximately 500 feet east of Lind St. and is bounded on the west
by the Burlington Northern right of way, and on the east by adjacent commercial property.
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
April 1, 1980
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local --including rezones) :
Building permit — City of Renton
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain :
No
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal ? If yes , explain :
No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
None
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic X
substructures?
TES— MAYBE NO
b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- X
covering of the soil ?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
X
features?
YES MAYBE NO
d) The destruction , covering or modification of any X
unique geologic or physical features?
YES M YBE NO
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
X
either on or off the site?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the X
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
r .
1
2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) The creation of objectionable odors?
X
YES MAYBE NB
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature ,
or any change in climate , either locally or X
regionally?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation :
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or Xtherateandamountofsurfacewaterrunoff?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?X
YES MAYBE NO
e, Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to X
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
YES MAYBE NB—
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria,
X
or other substances into the ground waters?
YES MAYBE NO
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
X
for public water supplies?YES- MAYBE NO
Explanation: The area to be occupied by this construction overlays paved area
previously approved under the permit for the Freight Terminal and thus does not
alter the surface water runoff.
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops ,
X
microflora and aquatic plants)?YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
X
endangered species of flora?
YES MMAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X
species?
YTS MAC No
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
X
YES Rim NO
Explanation:
4-
5) Fauna. 4111 the proposal result in :
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X
endangered species of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area ,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement X
of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
X
glare?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: Some yard lights may be installed.
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
X
present or planned land use of an area?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
X
in the event of an accident or upset conditions?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population X
of an area?yrs-- FTTFT N
Explanation:
4
s. 5-
12) lousing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or
create a demand for additional housing? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in :
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand
Xfornewparking.
YES MAYBE NO
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
a) Fire protection?
X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Police protection?
X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Schools?
X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads?
X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services?
X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: No changes beyond those imposed by the approved terminal
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
YES MAYBE NO
b Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require X
the development of new sources of energy?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities :
a) Power or natural gas?
X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Communications systems?
X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Water?
X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Storm water drainage?
X
YES MAYBE NO
X
f) Solid waste and disposal?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
New gas service from 29th St. Other utilities are part of
freight terminal service.
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? X
YES g'0117 NO
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
X
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the le agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in e iance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful 1 ck of 11 disclosure on my part.
Proponent:
igned
Bruce C. Olsen, Consulting Engineer
name printed)
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
nf-0 I
OW
fiewaTT L,NO'/sST.Rs'-'
L_ -_L
A`
ti
LOTSiIlI(I(I(IIl(II1111111111`f lllll
l
0,4,,,.,"„//
i \
0 1-
NLN rou,ve, 8W,MINAnCI d^
flax 4I.4V,6JC'
3
h
AMMO'/w,.vf i'` cwL.*AO /k.WrANG M
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII r"
ern um! w/N N
V
SITE PLAN 4 m
Lo=o'
LEGAL Of-SCRIPT/ON, wLDoiNCC rrvf,y-N RA!T SPP/NKLED
Lori if•,KK mK/• Nvw ONE N NYO O• 171CiM/P WRA69
4111t1NOTW NOC174,N aVtt.4 E ZONE ,9
wousrr,AL Meg a acNrw, ApF.A Or D?E:90Z7/6 31!INVISiAV I.
A4l4 or PU/LD/N6 7000 fr
goo,AMA 11.970 Or
NUMQfR cr JTOPErf,•Ave
C1Tr
e.
i ;U 1Ili '... ca- ',_-,:.-,?1
y
A 0
11:
r"ENT
amour MIT Afv/bpy o6CR/?.W LAWN OM ACLwN
c c.o
1I
Wr S/TE PLAN
EQU/GM61/T MAINTENANCE OLOG r-
1
u .eevr i#,W• Ai/
tc-ry SUPERIOR PAST $!E/6NT
Jives ORUCE C. OL$EN,• Caro/Nny Enyrneer, Seat, L
is `ti
3NDING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
jak,il i
A3279 :