Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA80-024Strati
The other way to build CJFILLIE ).
Stran's natural earth tone colors give you beauty that's tough and durable.
The factory-baked-on color coating method used on all Stran panels
and trim will keep your building virtually maintenance-free for years to come.
And the selection of warm earth tones lets you choose
a building color that will be just as contemporary tomorrow as it is today.
EXTERIOR PANEL COLORS
coLoRs
Sky Blue
Autumn
Gold
STRAN WALL
INTERIOR COLORS
Arctic 4':-`i ":1' s2 Light14.. ?:; ,.y Arctic Earth
White a Stone
t"s White Green
Embossed r, Embossed
STRAN WALL
EXTERIOR ACCENT COLORS
River Olive
Sand Green
Moss Dawn
Green Yellow
Light ' • # T * a Dawn
Stone "` u Yellow
r }Sunset Midnight i,
Copper Bronze
EXTERIOR TRIM COLORS
Jy PT:', :q' ,pa a,
i
m ER4 Arctic Midnight
la /EE.t C'•y :.„ E3 White Bronze
11 74'11.
0 _n'
4 `_
b xy y r!' 7.7 Id a;t', 17, m
7. c 1 National Steel
Products Company
7 Subsidiary of
National Steel Corporation
P.O. Box 40490, Houston,Texas 77040.
Note:In keeping with Stran's policy of continuous product improvement,all specifications are subject to change without notice.
All products are backed by written warranty,available by writing National Steel Products Company.
Note:Consult your Stran Builder for color availability on specific panels and finishes. Litho in U.S.A. Copyright,1978,National Steel Products Company Form No.78-CS-520
f n
4.. B 7"C E 4';
6;/2
3.4
1
S0111 POINT
a. -,.. .
6--. ,_--..- ....Pc A 1 ^-7 ; L''_.4----:
1 -- •"L1'
i•::r., C',,--',
1
F-- ill .I
N, R.4.4.,R r's ;
a.:*',\,\•:\
1-2,_-__-___a a a ' „ ''. -.'•.:--. -
L a k e .4:,,2_, :_,.. - __ ','..,_,:,,, _--,..,..-i,-.., ..,, ,•,' i...___-___'. --i_.--i___-
7.•
1,2 •',' 2- ' ' -.',-- - '• - ;-'‘ ,
I,_ 1I -V -.
70
y. .:„5''___._ :•.:,,;_1.4,_'_- _L.
r('
2_
rl .:="
r ."-- .7
1.'"'''''' shintton 1
2
e'•---,___...,:;,..)......,
5 5, . -- /- /1„. 4,\----r
2. ..-...., •••-,,,,Y• -,.. 1. -4,, 44,4-.; ::: •:,.
tc
f 1 '
i::_l.p.1",,-- T'''.' , ?-'•,,..-,-c---/A-- ',-'',c, /42\:.-,..,c.,,,,,,,•_.1,
7).
r ..-
7.,!_p;:,,-/-1,,,,\..., s,`,--..,...-• ,x.<04,
P•-••; ,.4
n . -:, : ,,....._.:,_ ,,,,,..,__,.1.,
A . 7 ,-_--5,, •••,5_ •. ,..R.,,,,r\,,,,,,,,,,;\,,,
z\
e`,
A','.‘, '\';'‘:-• • r\----;ka,g' '?'13 .
1 ... „,,,,,,..r...;.(r..„)
Lt___-);
0.,../.-
k......•;,.,:,,i. 't,',.,..c.'5.•
ilf.„, \-151-.7.,sr7.2--,1,./?' I sT `"-
i'' : 2, -p;
4.,__-_,L.ici-____11,.- L E., ' '' ' - -' •,•:''- ,
1-. ' -- • r; ,_,,, -, , 1 --, ,,,
T.,- .c.
3-,-1---1 .,- PT 1 ,
7
1",.-,.
7.,,, ,.,1 , .
a b-,,.,,„,____
L____
G „, _.!_, ,;.-_ ,,,
y"--4.,_S_ ,' ST,
Ic--
4•:_u•-„X",-"rs'r:\.
tZt..A.:--f,,. '''.'::\i-.-'-‘-• - ) 4,7-:.-"1 '''
4:4-''"-'--'',
4,7L',5:11. 15'::tj c
I.- ,,i ._ °:-;:'; r16i, I
4.^1 ST•-•,,,r .. .,,„,,,,,,,,. c,..- r,,...
0 CJ
ti' i'' ..... .-`..\--' "t. ..„ ' .`, .' 1 -2-: '--'2'• - lic,7,1;i7.7,1 4,--t
31 ,„..,-,•?,,\.•:, i .":.' ', .-P ,,' 4:'. ,','
Y' "-.: '‘,./Z.F78 ,,...7):2.-
1*:;-/-
6.1 1.11'-'-l -ft,'•di 5 1 7rh-'p-pi7474-
3 '
1 1675,12
I
1
1'
1 '''';:,.•. '.-.-"'4 _:.,
To. --27.`4;-.•8',. ST
d• ----2,_i_p_i,,,,,,--....„4/
Tt.- :\:.,..,, ... \. . ......._,J,:,.....:,..-..,'1F _`,.._:_,:_'••_T ..•:,ri •e-.,1 P_.„,---).7e,i,...
3•
1 \..,'. -.;-----T..;„°<, = P- 1 --e-t---t— ,.,4___S±Tj_ ,,,i ..
1' '''.6 '...5..rk... ''.P-' . '
t.-
r'''.-:'-•• F''-.-','''"—i:: , . "'',,, I ; L'A'Ll ,.,,,, '912-It , • 1 _,„.- 7'N‘A. :„,,,,,EF'/' • ._:3;. _ . ,L2-1-1Z.Dir'',T--Hs ,20,,-., ,-f-.:
T• 1 I'I' '':, 1
S, ..,' .''',120'"P‘- 1.,...,-,1 - ' '-':--, •
x„.•,‘„,. ,. - : -1„-. .•,,. '.,,•„,,,,.4. ..,.. i.
4.•T i'.: ;,,,, Ilt-
c \,.., _ I_
T.,.._2 57,iD 5TcP ,,T.„....,..„....„ .;, .4:4_,..74,4-, : :-:, -: .-: . -,,.. .., .1-,.-2,-.2- ,-- ..i. .7, .,,. 2, ).„_t5'? ;?2NR 1 cp_Ls =,.,.. _ s
i''
L.
2I ":' -..• L.'7 • ,I- ,a q . -`•• ..p,D,S i23DPL ' -' •
s' '- ' '''''
q_1-:-15' ''''.''''-';'- '''''r:'st "'k, . i,14±4 ...-------
rr. 1 -., ,,,,;'-----',.--",-;-i."-,k-,-17i" .''Reii?0,-,, , -;; -.i•-•:-.1 - ' 'sr,-,E. f. ;,-CP ' ?<.,
4.4t11,.,....-\--- ,..... ;... 1 • , , -
1' ,1 .
c .i. .,, Ri 1.1,,,,DI\.
37:1-,,..:---. ,, , ,
k ,_I ,__, s .., _ '..,._
1, ::..
1-
NL:
1,•
1;-ac ?-
1 /‘-'
11":N'';.•"' -' ''''' ..
7-je2-1''T,.7,_.;‘,:-;'- '' .-..,
f',' sk---- ',----..--c-'-L.-----r --' -:'.7!4,-- '''--; t,<,- ', At:Port, .\\• 4 ,L`1,,,ii.,.'7,1 C _:, ,.2 .--,? "-•:••• 'ft,- -I_ •,,-- ,;1".%. : ' ''',.' 7- . .
E:',,,!. ':,''1-;'''.' .
e.i'212-',47C. - i . A,. ... • , ' .'=
T'
T f
Cc\c 1..„ .
IT
71, , .. .''' „; , \F._• ,,,‘„t,•.-I ,i 5. '.,-,,, •--•,,t• , •,..''iKT1P‘,..5 \
s>
41s .is:
4,, ...- • • ,
1--:,..,,,,/, ,4 ;,...
1 _...-,,„,..-,:• 7...,..—
t,-,,, _,_.
1 7._ ,e ..-•-• ,• ,- .„,_:,,--,
7, :-- -- --1 .. -
7: .
0._ --,,,,. ---
t,i,:;. -,.--7,-.;,7-7z,---, „ ,.• - --- 13 't,=",-,.---4--4 ,7,i .-;.-,L4,;-`4-',-,-.,--,-; t-. - ,r ;_;']. ",-"' 1. , _ ;",- ,-.'...-
Li_ •-
6-,.,..- _,
Th:. . ,_„ , ,,,,...„,_ ,..,_,,,,_,.... r7e'•-• 5, , .. .:i4 ,. , •'.72-.....='" 4,-. ..-:7, ----,-...,'J:. 1
5T. '1/44e'-.5‘
f"or rse.'.4's. '''''..'\ - -.P:'''''',4:
5 .... "B,g''''' "'',.•,- te ---'4'.1/1.,u.,S :': :,' IL ; 4.4'.:: ' : •. ..*,.,, ^ -
V-- -,,,
4„,-'km'' ''..-: N. ,,,,--;---,_..._-,,,
7, ,•,, - r'- 4.- —,-..--._ Z;....,,_.:-7 ..,7-,,,.., . •
r ,, ,:, i<6 1,_!.,,..5,,,iT_c,.,....cz...,
s.43, , '.•„,- .... .. ".:.,'
T,,, 1-fili ...; .\ .,. r, ..„-_'__.,_ .
s ,,-,
4‘ 1 1; ',71,:!;1' ',"
ST___ 5+k- 7T,._-„__2,2___:_,__, _1°' i' , .„.f -?..--'- •44Tres, - ..•'- — ----- GOLIC,g;111Sf
14,, ,_ ,
t .„. FT•,,,.. sl.'i - I P,.. 'I 1.'HAiLg' '''' '; -'I A •-,,,,,,-....\,• E ,,'°'A, ._ , D; ''''4
f.„'-, ,A._ ii
See !vial, -11
34 ,A B lv
C 1\.. '-- Y/D
b. '
z...--(_..--
lr
E
rr,fer.,•,..i. •••!_-___.-1---- ; '
A ;/\..)
57601 POINT0 -27-7-#"
2"
f, ,f`„ -• '-.).,. .
iif:-R A.5'10..
I -'-.
7::--'-'?i-
j .
1•.:2 11 '‘ ::' I-'
j;„i:- '-- B Fi"A C H KFAIY,YD,L- 4-. -IT-- --1.. : \ ..
II ' -
i
i.',1„
1:-3:1:1:'
r';.'.';' ' '',
1 , ,.t• ;',-,,
T ,,, ,-',‘
L a k e . 47, Is-._X.,,,,,,,,...,..p_•_______i5 .4 AS,„'`''',..-: .-; `,':'.',. . :,'''',"' ' <,,,,,Q ,..
t.1----,-1 -- . --7"..-'if ;.
r'l
S
1• l'- 1 '14:f: '-r:-- 1 k <''',\\
s;-.
1 T,r,7
o ' aS niPigtOn
1,
I
4 , —,,,,
A.,
I N,g '-,.'
4•:,,,-_ ' -•-_'-.L',__ '•',- (4, f:-------......._2 r,
t--z-:,'..--,--, - '
7.•?;;;; ., ''''...;.,..: 1----,-._:-7. •••,;;',..,
i_I try •;••
Y_e‘% ‘‘ n.. sT-•'-/
13'.`i ''•• ' -=-•ti-•-, 0'
e",•
1 . i i •"70';‘, 2,47,77;, -7.-T---(,,,,,„ L -'•:.•••.
I ,-;A .\., 1..„Vt;,...9:7‘, ,. -44 AekI -- - `- *11.1`-'_' .,. ,‘,4'.1--,ra. ,,,,\ < .A- - .- -4
2- t--7
CO4<-s .V-;' .-;;' '- " 11 t' ei;L-'1W-?.."-1,.'ja"'<._..C7-Ck(\-€3,'_,_':.'s','''':;:`..''''<'t, ‘;\ - -, ,..n.
s'Nti, -5'15Lsi'""qc,:
4. , r -'' T =:, .• ;' - - :-,',.-_ '''''''''''.-',"-;;41 '''6'(
e-''''''''. 52.'\••''''.,',- <It:-,' '''',-‘,','N,
s----- '`-',.',' 'i =,:i-„E,--, ',--',X" '.;1,i";,'i 1 ''.),.'4:-``f-'/- V\,\f,'",,,,L;A.,`,.. ,•,;;;;-;;',..,-\•-)'
4i,,
O 1 .•_*''a::
4,,,,.,1
S.
f'_:."_
5—_„''.2_,'N'''-'•-•'S3 i i'•:'' --.A -•-`,• A;'•••!
i- .
1 i N•Vsy-4,` \';.45k'4,4 `..--,4J-';`-1='-.-,'6'';"4C- i '''\\_
Th,3
r.i4:,, ,,7,,•s 7--- 1,
r.„...3 ,-,-,,•,-,,,,,_•> .-..f...,-,-..,.- ,, :.__L-----,..i., ...-1,1.. \?..i...,--..„......1._.,•±-i.s.„.2_,._--,, . ....-ir
i,, !;••
E:2,11;-/—4221,,,,,,_ ,-; Cr,'_i, 4,
ec, ..„ L,'5::_
r_..,..._._-
7...,_-,, ,,,-.T.;-„, ,..;,,,,, 4.,, c, -•,., ,,,...,1 ..,, i q.,,
e,',. !
a,,,__,1-2.--,,,,,_,..2ir,,,,_, F§T-Ti _ \___:,? 4 •,,
f. ec;:.. '6,. \ 0-1 , •,m ,,1 , '-• ' ,74,,_lc-.), \:3ff•••-•4. - .i-f-,:---r-,.. - .,..:'t,,,,,,.„ ,•__
f__,i_i_ ,.., f. .. , ,-
C, al ',..,__.. _,-;,,E)_,;;••__ S T 1 r--, a,..,,,,1 \8I .,i . sr_2:-..y.4_31___,1--„--r-7,,i, --1,_!:_gi'L;sT, `>-- -,--
r'"`-.'''' '* 7 .-c '..',:, i
0. ' ' ‘,-'e'''N st:
as,c3 ' ''' , > a''I fr';'' -.13: --'11 I r:'4*-'''..!''' i54 "-— ' 1`,1-_.,G-sr'', ' ,`, -:'; ''A -t. -',1. \ '','''\ 1-ca.4z..,-"'7,, ' '''-* - 't",-;!--,-=-1"
4•-,-• --
7,!'el 'I ,,:',, '5 1-:31 5T*---i- i- It ' 1',''' I ''''.;-R—f7=-1 1 K. 'rl - - A j ,....'" 1:s sT, •0,CS 1-`: `''.g.'‘,7,,, 1-44®1,,,,,,„,6,..,-s?,,,\,,-.4' -,, if •--;j"-,.."7:1-4
4 -',1 • :44"-5'.8"'"'31-`,,,' al ''' 4 N. =, , ,1137 t , ;.; ,P-'..----7,_
11 S 1.004.-;›,''-'1 I''j•I .,;_t• Ii6i Pi'1.5.-_-,,,i, r- ,•:/e," "'"'••••' 1 ,, - - ''' cJ
cloatE'LaCE N. ••--sr liZ -'--,,-- S 118T ST
41-, c,.,
11 ., ••,, .*, , „j ,,, 1 .,,,-,—t_..,5.,13* P,.
1 i-,,,,..4,,,,,, ,
i','T I•3-- ''kf C.''-7, .-. -1— --
r-c•51-•••
Lr,•'--1--" ' ‘, ' '‘k ft-' 8\‘Aif "Ey COcil -- ,.. ,.,,,, . Ff., sli;192_,1_..•.Lr,1,...
j\b.kLIfriiii,-5.,.. .o '\ ,..,..,`,\n' ,....,.%, 1 I '-'4,AZ.::.° , . -1-22"'-11 • ' 1
A 1
1.4--- _..,„`ni.` A ,.'''''x'''\,.‘ .'
c
7,,,s....._4____';
rf' si- w
1
S , I 120TIAIS11,s`''',,,o,.? ..,:.
rs.,,,,, <-...";,:‘,.;;_l'.'" ,4_1_2_9111',..t.•,,y..._., ,. sT ?;,-12;;;4,, , , ; ,,,v,x,,,,,,,AT E.,„t.,s4 . A N",':-.\\ -- . - , ,..,si[ . --•,-,1 --1 ,ni-(i,p)..,',A.?,,-20",, 1--L. c 12 , t,__ s I '',1"-2j-
v
1_14.`s44'
1, ,; I ‘, \',,,:f•
If,
114,, . •
f;,'„,
44, ,
0,,,, ,-S .?_-,„,r,.t,..PAP, , .
4 .. .,)-(
t>.; \TS' n' ' ; i q liND A.L'L'' F.-10 ,; ; ' ' ,, ; ,A'10,i Min',-,"•,,,i , 4dif..,,
IT.r,vii,,,>4:s. .„.„ ,. \..,,,,,,,,, „.„,„;
m \.,.„‹,,,,,42,...;•,,,d ..,,..1,1,...5,,,,.,., .:,,t,....2
v.,,.
1....,\
j.:,.
1, ,2'# c1,2E'
r.
T,V,;;.,.____-—ci,,3„:„s r.,.
z,.•
miii. . \i (firl,,I.2.:izT--\\5„:
r. '',..,,,,„ <,,,,,
j)*,,,, '
1:., N, ,_. 'ii it,. i--\"",,,,..1...,::':'4.4
i, , ,t.( ! 4,02,,,, _,.. ..0,.,-,,
i,---
2-.=_,...-: pL •.-..-!: ILI ; 1 3,i,,;,ip,
PA-. w
7i --.---i . '‘ '7'1''''''''''';'i 4.
0 \: -\`';''' \S`'')-'--'4'14 c \t". ?4,..
1:' L' ST '\ '''''*
2 '''; S 1.''TS"'* 'illi"1"'''''sW''''-_:--
1 $
T.-- ';':;•• •''''" ' ' j j---'.1--'-''-71--4 -\--?:r"`"-- i.-"---'';' '''' ''' \ 1 I)' ''
S' '. 2‘‘
A. '?,'
T'‘'
s"'
5' \IV \`7;"'"Iirk----CP---- -,-,°,0,•°,,c'
d,
vL-
c,-, ----:,,. 1,- d ',,r,•,!...1 ,.:. -... ,,.,..,, •.,.---f,.,.e-,e,
s s'
Re'04,4. \ s., 4-1--r!c1-1-1-",r414., 5 12V S,'''% .',,,, ,
I.:. ,,,A\ , t l' ih'''L',0,s' '-t-Aj._?dv.,--, ,1" 44,;14&,<AICTEA:Pt-A`:''';(
7,
A- . 1 r-1\ In 1-7.-:',/t9.4-71,4,--j. s , \--rr.`
L.,„ \\
1,, , - ,, ,I ''"----\\ s''
re..„.."/
2--____.
z/ '''\;,....sxli•-
1,„,..,..,,,,,.'1,-„t",i4J-3*---=‘,-- " _ell:\ ril r l'--, :7--_ ) 1 ; 1 , ,
t`,
41 ':'`gi ,.',.I 4 i,,,. I 4', ' )I'. ''
i
r' .,..\\ rr I '5.,E•ZT T;; ;;,, ,2;1' •SIDL4.•.1-• ,.,...".%.,:..'.:. ,P.'..fa..r1;";01;41;C;',1;Zi l'X'°,•,12'f1 4i-•rni' 'r. ',',..,.•.,:si i'll).•-r,.
1.',-.
1,4 ' -° --.IVirs,
542=0!..,____ .1- ---.S-- ., ''.,',...ATA",,!2'...:
1__
1,_.',!0te.04.•,_
0`
C "----,A --$11-1-i--- "'' i ..' -\SA''',1' - "-e'r_____„_1 ..;i7''-''''',:..„__
y_' '' ''''''"?A.i'-'I Trii ,r 1 ‘;_-_-_-,/6-;-,4c `----",-' -I-r-t,-,-- - :y „ ' '29,4 ' : ..._%;'- / --• '';'-'-..!. ,,,'",)
s.;129,-.ZST i I tql -`, :,:if- '-' ''''--''' 4. ..-:' 7`'T• .,:e __,. V. 1,---
i._.-22 ,'_ _it f..;-1-,'''' .. ,,,,,,4
s.9 -
7' .' s'; '
1,, \s,„:,,t7s s i 27,4c51-ar,:'`Ro';.' ..` ::'' - - -''----
s•
Cc----', '''-i 4>'-.' ' -f-,4-' ----a"."--t-"=,,NN.'"----' ;` ';:-.'Q::.-:';'••• ••'<i' ...A4!.. 1s,,,,z,,,, .,„
s,,,,,c. _1 A.i.,‘,..2 ST__ __,__,T,..424 1,..<1.4,/',,, 5--Froz kl'5,t--
S•1 ,...'f.:,4.••••"'°01'1-'
3
5.' ' ; - f / iv •••• i. "'le. ,- ,
1 1-
5 ,,
f, 46'N 11 .0;<,,if. ,..0,,.:----!-AO ,• ''-;``'.„!,„ '. -
E.,, -----R4: .; ' ''''',_,... 4,,,,,.., ,F-1
1'..__":5.•c.12:-<57 ..,; '...1 , / ,....: 4.
s;
z..;: ......;-., Si
f ,••'?/';,' // '," . ' \.', ''`f
Ns,„ ,-if' ‘c,,_,,,.. ! <il v,`.--s\
3,Piii,e. '-rs. .2.3z5.,--3;i7:::::?1-
1;:-.J.:-._; : • ci,;
r •' -1-- •4.4"••&" ' -'-'
4,i1.'•. '4: '44
5-1'8t f:(
16 -'-IV
I 1-;-/-"-'
7-•,,,,.',-ril'''', '',1 ',P.';'4;4 41').
4 /4420,,/, ,,4,. .,,e_ _4,_22,91,7?-4,1,4, )_,•,..,,,, --
s •-'•-•'•" 4•'• -,
1:•'.4 "Nc-•,,- ..,,..4 „,/• , .: es,S,-,-.- '•''' -'`,2..i.;14--114---, - 1' ''-.0 .---. --‘:‘,....----------"."
4,--, - ' '
5 -,'7,'L''
I % ''"-,0 '
1,:ie.t,N.CoRf„r re';'-'',..;A. ."-
s'''',.' ;'‘ I......-44- 1k,s.,....c.:•7•-TP''''''4 ''''''''''',":
4. AA.: ''''''`' '',;,_4),,0:15„,:;;434,:,,Ar'.;i( '''..)r:r-----C`,,, C1.4 't‘c'`'S , L•SL.,!',5y- \<_--,:-,----t('-‘ ‘••,', `•
4,"/ 44-::• 'N 4/---,51••)'4' \,' • p-' ---""I 1'0-1-• 1 ‘-, „,qc. , ,6— ,„„, . -,,, 6,1?,.ii,-,,,T., . - , „T`, .c..`,-, ",,, ..•_,:•32,,,.-s-•;-\\--;, ---0.-',,,,- ...-- -- s.,s-,,, ,:.,, -„ ,
p : 11,1 ''''. .., ‘ ' , -'•-.' .-...,,
t,..,:i:":....,.-...'''r,.. c 143,D s; -' EMIL,'.!C ra.1 ..00 r,..z. .,,q .7,1,,,-// ii ss,,,s7 1 ,, ?2.\g _
4-
T
c),•:; J..- '.._ i 1 Di ''''31 A - ''''''''E 1,
s,,,-,..,;,! I .. '''..\:\t,
See Map 41
Stran
The other way to build
Stran's natural earth tone colors give you beauty that's tough and durable.
The factory-baked-on color coating method used on all Stran panels
and trim will keep your building virtually maintenance-free for years to come,
And the selection of warm earth tones lets you choose
a building color that will be just as contemporary tomorrow as it is today.
EXTERIOR PANEL COLORS
COLORS
Sky Blue
Autumn
Gold
STRAN WALL
INTERIOR COLORS
r
Arctic Light
Arctic EarthWhiteti.r' Stone
White GreenEmbossed
r
f'.; Embossed
STRAN WALL
EXTERIOR ACCENT COLORS
River Olive
Sand Green
Moss Dawn
Green Yellow
Light '":.: Dawn
Stone Yellow
Sunset Midnight
fir
fz
Copper Bronze
EXTERIOR TRIM COLORS
Arctic Midnight
a o L' r, 4 ° _. n r#
t 1 White Bronze
tit
National SteelZenti0,5, E? c' y`Wg ud Products Company
Subsidiary of
National Steel Corporation
P.O. Box 40490, Houston,Texas 77040.
Note:In keeping with Stran's policy of continuous product improvement,all specifications are subject to change without notice.
All products are backed by written warranty,available by writing National Steel Products Company.
Note:Consult your Stran Builder for color availability on specific panels and finishes. Litho in U.S.A. Copyright,1978,National Steel Products Company Form No.78-CS-520
BEIIIdG
OF FILE
FILE TITLE CRaPILMED
0 24
April 28, 1980
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION,
APPLICANT: Fancher Flyways. FILE NO. SA-024-80
LOCATION: East side of Renton Municipal Airport approximately 1,000 feet
north of the Boeing Bridge.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site approval for two tee hangars and
tie-down facilities at the Renton Municipal Airport.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions.
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the
REPORT: Examiner on April 16, 1980.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application, and field
checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner •
conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on April 22, 1980 at 9:00 a.m.: in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building.
Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the
Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed the report, and
entered the following exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #1: Application File with staff report and
other pertinent documents
Exhibit #2: Site Plan with staff comments
Exhibit #3: Landscaping Plan with staff comments
Referencing Section L.5 of the staff report requiring conformance of the landscaping plan
to the approved theme of the Airport Specialties facility to the north of the subject site,
Mr. Blaylock noted that Airport Specialties has not complied with city requirements to date.
The Examiner inquired if concern exists regarding signing on the property. Mr. Blaylock
advised that compliance with requirements of the Renton Sign Code would be enforced.
The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was:
Mel Johnson
7383 126th Place S.E.
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Johnson indicated concern regarding the requirement denoted in Section M.2 of the staff
report pertaining to completion of the water main extension prior to occupancy of the
structure. He advised that a meeting two months ago with representatives of the Fire
Department, the Airport Director and the Public Works Director had resulted in an agreement
that occupancy would be allowed if the City of Renton provided a letter to the applicant
stating that the water line would be constructed and listing an estimated completion date.
The Examiner requested clarification that the applicant has no control over the completion
date of the city construction project. The applicant responded affirmatively.
The Examiner requested further testimony in support or opposition to the application. There
was no response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department. Mr.
Blaylock advised that the Planning Department would not object to modification of Condition
No. M.2 regarding delay of occupancy until completion of the water main if it has been
agreed upon by each city department and if the City Attorney rules that the city will not
incur liability with such an agreement.
The Examiner noted that submission of a storm drainage and grading plan to the Public Works,-
Department would be required of the applicant prior to construction.
N
SA- r -80 Page Two
The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding
File No. SA-024-80 was closed by the Examiner at 9:20 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner
now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The request is for approval of a site plan for two tee hangars and tie down facilities
at the Renton Municipal Airport.
2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning
Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as
Exhibit #1.
3. Pursuant to the. City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has
been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official.
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed.
6. A water main needed for airport facilities is being extended into the subject site by
the city.
7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height
requirements of Section 4-719 (Airport) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of
General Ordinances.
8. The subject site is part of the original plat of the City of Renton. The site is
included within the Renton Municipal Airport and is leased from the city by the
applicant to provide hangar and storage facilities for private aircraft.
9. The site is essentially level and covered with grasses. The site is within two
hundred feet of the Cedar River, and therefore it is within the zone of protection
offered by the Shorelines Management Act. A Shoreline Management Substantial
Development Permit was issued for development on the site on November 9, 1978. .
Under this permit the applicant has two years to begin construction and five years
to complete construction.
10. The development surrounding the subject property is all aviation oriented and given
over to hangars, taxiways and runways.
Two similar storage buildings are located along the northern property lines of the
subject property.
11. Similar storage hangars have received approval on the adjacent site and the Planning
Department has recommended that the proposed landscaping theme be consistent with that
approved for the adjacent property. In addition, the Substantial Development Permit
required landscaping to be installed east of the access roadway.
12. The hangars will provide approximately 15,800 feet of storage space for about 13
aircraftland the tie down areas, each about .6100 square feet, will provide space for
about 10 to.12 additional aircraft.
The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires one parking space for each 1,500 square
feet of warehouse space and one parking space for each 2,000 square feet of uncovered
storage area (Sections 4-2208.3 and 4-2208.8) ; therefore, the applicant should provide
16 parking spaces.
13. The applicant has to provide storm drainage plans which are subject to approval of the
Public Works Department.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The site plans submitted by the applicant appear to permit a reasonable commercial
use of the subject property, and at the same time provide for compatible addition to
the airport and to the shoreline of the adjacent Cedar River. Screened and landscaped
as indicated in the proposed plans, the proposal should allow an integrated hangar
facility to blend into the approved surrounding developments and into the shoreline.
SA-024-80 Page Three
2. The size of the proposed development including both the hangar facilities and the
outside storage area requires 16 parking spaces, and therefore, the plans should
be revised to accommodate that number of vehicles.
3. In order to insure the integrity of the shoreline in this area, all landscaping should
be installed prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. The landscaping
installation shall be subject to approval of the Planning Department.
4. The exterior treatment of the building should be consistent and compatible with the
treatment of Airport Specialties and is subject to approval by the Planning Department.
DECISION:
Exhibits #2 and #3 are approved subject to:
1. Installation of the approved landscaping prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit.
2. Approval of the grading and storm drainage plans by the Public Works Department.
3. All conditions imposed by the Substantial Development Permit are complied with by the
applicant.
ORDERED THIS. 28th day of April, 1980.
Fred J._Ka an
Land Use Hearing Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 28th day of April, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party
of record:
Mel Johnson, 7383 126th Place S.E. , Renton, WA 98055
TRANSMITTED THIS 28th day of April, 1980 to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman
Ron Nelson, Building Division
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before May 12, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error
in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available
at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen
14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the
specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner'may, after review of the
record, take further action as he deems .proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that
such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting
other specified requirements. Copies of—this ordinance are available for inspection in
the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said
department.
C
N
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
PLAINNIING DEPART .ENIT Pi 2 21980
PMAM
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARINNG EXAI1IXER71819110,1111211:2:314'5'6
PUBLIC HEARING AI
APRIL 22 , 1980
EXHIBIT NO.
APPLICANT : FANCHER FLYWAYS
FILE NUMBER : SA-024-80 ITEM NO. 5 -
A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The applicant requests site approval for 2-tee hangers
and tie down facilities at the Renton Municipal Airport.
B. GENERAL INIF0RMATI0N1:
1. Owner of Record: CITY OF RENTON
2 . Applicant : FANCHER FLYWAYS
Owner: Gerda Wirz
3. Location :
Vicinity Map Attached) East side of Renton
Municipal Airport
approx. 1000 ' north
of the Boeing Bridge..
4. Legal Description : A detailed legal
description is available
on file in the Renton
Planning Dept.
5. Size of Property: 1 .62 acres
6. Access:Via Airport Way
7. Existing Zoning : P-la Public Use District
8. Existing Zoning in the Area: P-1, Public Use District
9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi-Public
10 . Notification: The applicant was
notified in writing.
of the hearing date. Notice
was properly published in
the Seattle Times on April
9, 1980 and posted ,
in three places on or near
the site as required by
City Ordinance. on
April 11, 1980.
C . (HISTORY/BACKGROUNID:
The subject site was part of the original plat 'of the
City of Renton. A Shoreline Management Substantial
Development Permit was issued for the subject property
on November 9, 1978.
D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1. Topography : The subject site is essentially level .
2 .. Soils : Urban Land (Ur ) . This soil is land that
has been modified by disturbance of the natural '
layers with the addition of fill up to several
feet thick to accommodate industry or housing.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING :::' FANCHER FLYWAYS, SA-024-BO
APRIL 22 , 1980
PAGE TWO
3. Vegetation :, The scrub grass along the river bank
near the east side of the subject site is the only
significant remaining natural vegetation.
4. , . Wildlife: Very little of the subject site is suitable
for wildlife habitat.
5. Water : The Cedar River is adjacent to the subject
site on the east.
6. Land Use: The site is presently utilized for airplane
taxiways and tiedowns.
E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
The surrounding properties are all aviation oriented
with,. most space utilized for hangers , taxiways, and
runways. There are two storage buildings for private
airplanes located on the northern property line.
F. PUAIC SERVICES:
1 . Water and Sewer: An 8" water main extends east-west
on Airport Way approximately 1/4 mile south of
the subject site and a12" main runs north-south
on Rainier Avenue North. A 24" sanitary sewer
runs north-south approximately 600 ' south of the
property and the Metro gravity line is approximately •
300 ' southest .
2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Departmen
pursuant to ordinance requirements.
3. Transit : Not applicable.
4. Schools: Not applicable.
5. Recreation : Not applicable.
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1. Section ,4-710-4, Review of Municipal Improvements .
2 . Section 4-710, Public Use District.
H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER
OFFICIAL. CITY DOCUMENT:
1 . Land Use Report , 1965, Objective 6, page 18.
2. Shoreline Master Program, City.,of Renton.
I . IMPACT OF THE- NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT :
1. Natural Systems : Minor .
2. Population/Employment : Minor.
3. Schools: Not applicable.
4. Social: Not applicable .
5. Traffic: Minor .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : FANCHER FLYWAYS, SA-024-80
APRIL 22 , 1980
PAGE' THREE
J. ENVIRONMENTAL .ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance
and the. State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended,
RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance has been
prepared for the subject proposal . This- is based upon
provision of suitable landscaping to buffer and reduce
the potential impact of structures and pavement areas
per approval of the Planning Department together with
the provision of suitable drainage plans and traffic
control measures per Public Works Department approval .
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED :
1. City of Renton Building Division.
2 . . City of Renton Engineering Division.
3: City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division.
4. City of Renton Utilities Division.
5. City of Renton Fire Department.
L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS :
1. The subject proposal is consistent with the public
use designation of "theAand use element of the
City 's Comprehensive Plan, the existing zoning
and the Airport Master Plan.
2. The subject proposal included the construction
of 2-hangers totaling 15, 820 square feet of space
for the storage of 13 aircraft. Two tiedown areas
are proposed which will provide approximately 10-12
spaces.
3. The use proposed is compatable and directly dependent
upon the facilities of the City of Renton Airport.
Immediately north of the subject site , Airport
Specialties is constructing similar airplane storage
hangers under Substantial Development Permit SM-35-75
and Site Approval SA-829-75.
4. The subject site plan proposed complies with the
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM-64-78)
that was issued by the City of Renton on November
9 , 1978 which became valid on December 5, .1978.
5 . The landscaping plan as submitted addresses the
site area of the lease. ' The Shoreline Management
Permit required that 10 feet of landscaping be
placed off the site on the east side of the roadway. .
The plant materials suggested around the hangers
are appropriate and appear to be of adequate size.
The plant materials planted on the east .side of
the road should follow the same theme approved
for Airport Specialties.
6. The necessary fire flows for the facility will
be provided when the Airport constructs a new water
main along the eastern boundary of the subject
site. The Fire Department has requested that two
fire hydrants be placed within 150 feet of the
hanger structures.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO ,THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: FANCHER FLYWAYS, SA-024-80
APRIL 22, 1980
PAGE FOUR
7. Grading and storm drainage plans will have to be
approved by the Public Works Department prior to
the issuance of a building permit .
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: -
It is recommended that the request for site plan approval
File Number SA-024-80, as requested by Fancher Flyways
be approved subject to the following conditions :
1. That detailed landscaping plans for the 10-foot
landscaping strip east of the access road be approved
by the Planning Department prior to issuance of
a building permit. (The theme is to follow that
approved for Airport Specialties. )
2. That the water main extension be completed prior
to occupancy of the structures.
3. Approval of grading and storm drainage plans by
the Public Works Department prior to issuance of
a building permit .
c
Z
4 k
0
I
i 4 I
1.1T.2. --
0_ __
i k .C11T•I. [a14f1Y4 Nt.V•1•r
7• A •,OfNAt. •••,/ 6•1'} a.ta - .• - 1
tom ti . . y •- JJ
1 if_
I,. , 4uI;4EQ w 1 IT:
ft ir,,,114
I.... .. .... _ .... I
0 It
41` .:
TIC, •
If
rk P it 11 .
Is- A 11 so t!•t.T tv/ G• c. It ---1 \t
l• .
A,
P.
v. .
kb 111 IT . ,NP5TEu. dt rlea. ` • It1 •
t
It
L _... i _..I 4.._.._ ...I Ili 144kt
Itti •
VZI
C ti J 3
iL1D[l14 .DA RS. s w
sA LT #7u I LAG t 1 -r.rr•-'
a.
A.i in,c
d.• .746.X 1•\V Ay .--">
o•
Q 1
TID D.A A
o...
tiP
i
I - •
f t .. ..• ..
tk1.. • . ..CN‘
st,11
1.6 1 S;Zi a i
Ini ‘iir 2"AirgALT \V/6`G•R -7
4tAit% 1%
1 1
1 s
3/Z7h0 Planning
12-1979
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application :SA -0 Z4/- 0CSi Apere vas •ar ex ritatr Aulddtr
giclicotos-n(4c i'Itqfes. •
Location: Reveton niusietpe.1 Aerraet (se, LY j
Applicant: F &tc/ r Alpfy1 yS
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 'l/is/8e
Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE : 44(3f490
Public Works Department Wei
Engineering Division 0
co 2\
Traffic Engineering
Building Division 1 G.>>: c :'•
Utilities Engineering
ry /o 1 t /
Fire Department
Other) :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRIZAlijipeIHE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
AT 9:UOA.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.
IF UR EPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ ATTEND THE ARC,
PLEA4JPRQVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
I
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
Masi. /1't& /2 u,ienti5,(.i ,o/` /-RriC l of 7/./6 c4e.vi/Seie"-c
pi& CU!05 • ' j -CdniST24eG7ic34-) x9 Ca/Adr- 2c" ..cam pec-4'44 I2
b.ii%/ f(26. ^-r/t2St z. • ,'---//z' fz-o cr) 2 -c9dJ, v /`o.c 7".4z/s
r) 1,-GO.oE/1"/E.N 7- if Z S o 0 i'iL? W,7.471 7 ) Ad 4 A/7" ..S-
cGOG.42_,.. ' cw4j,..7 ") sa.. / c. , - 7--y S-T/2dC TiJ r • C9'hs,e - •
3 /e /a
Signature of Director or A horized Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ua,i.i-ri
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
7-)
t-ig-/)1
I 0i!
0 ,, A/kL-1
Signature :f Director or Authorized Representative Date
3J27/S0 Plan
12-1 ,7
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: , ..".002C 8OtJ/ Rp /Aifaf4" Tyr' Gt • AA/etr-
11M,$- Eace'l,'/,e;.
0
t/ie
Location: Reeeton -1I1ui ks p A% po p ' (See id kam
Applicant: F ,tcApr AZypiVelig
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: '1//s/3D
Police, Department A.R.C. MEETING :DATE: 3I9t)
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
T f fi c Engineering rib1/1/Li)
Building Division f6i r;
Utilities Engineering,
Fire Department
Other) :
1r_
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRI 0 THE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
AT 9:bU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM..
IF UR EPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ A TEND THE ARC,
PLEA4UPRQVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY y:OU P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
2- %,1)-- )6
Signature of pirector or Authorize Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : A./G/i(«e,e:z2//k./G
Approved v A roved with Conditions Not ApprovedPPPP
a/ p'a 07 i-17/
D// oc7r47
1314'7J8°Planning
12-1979
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application :Sit—Oins'9Q(JI APpf4((a TOr et. Attlat.r)
t a egibsi1$` fitee'It fes.
Location : Rerefli)Vt 1IIt ttfct p ( 4ttport (re itlemitsiNt11,4
Applicant: F* chr /a'yilliel s
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 10480
Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE: V.V.80_
Public Works Department
En sneering Division
Traffic Engineering a,
k ;;{ ,,
Building Division r;') '`i-. .r
f'‘;., . , .1i i '\
Utilities Engineering i
M
Fire Department i)
Other) :
j
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING NB THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
3 aft) AT 9:U0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.
IF UR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO A TEND THE ARC,
PLEA R VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P.M. ONce1W760
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
A' Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
r yj d/ /Nt#6G C 7' /e/i'y s`ef a,,-d s -Al v"`d
046,-'e
ZA 5—
C:7)-- -,
7-- - c. .3%_,E,/gc)
Signature of DirecectV//orwor Authorized Representative Date
REVI'EWING1 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
j _
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
7/3
Si'anature of Director or Authorized Representative Bat
PROPOSED/FINAL GC /YLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCLflWN-SIGNIFICANCE
I
Application No... sM-64-78
PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No. ECF-374-78 0 FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Construct a tee hangar and tie down facilities
at the Renton Municipal Airport
i
Proponent Fancher Flyways, Inc. , P.O.Box 412, Renton, WA 98055
Fancher FlywaysLocationofProposalRentonMunicipalAirport- lease
Z known as Parcel No. 1 s 2)
Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal has been determined to havesignificantadverseimpactupontheenvironment.
CM no a
Lj isisnotrequiredunderRCW43.21C.030(2) (c) . Thismaaafterreviewbytheleadagencyofacompletedenvironmental ,checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.I
Reasons for declaration of environmental significance :
This declaration is based upon provision of suitable landscaping to
buffer and reduce potential impact of structures and pavement areas
per approval of the Planning Department, together with provision of
suitable drainage plans and traffic control measures per Public [Yorks
Department approval.
Measures , if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitigate theenvironmentalimpactstosuchanextentthattheleadagencywouldwithdrawitsdeclarationofsignificanceandissuea (proposed/final )declaration of non-significance:
1
i
1
Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen
Title _ Plann' _ D eet.r Date November 9, 1978
AlOSignature ,,Z F
City of Renton
Planning Departmentrv.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
APRIL 22 , 1980
APPLICANT : FANCHER FLYWAYS
FILE NUMBER : SA-024-80
A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The applicant requests site approval for 2-tee hangers
and tie down facilities at the Renton Municipal Airport.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1 . Owner of Record : CITY OF RENTON
2. Applicant : FANCHER FLYWAYS
Owner: Gerda Wirz
3. Location :
Vicinity Map Attached) East side of Renton
Municipal Airport
approx. 1000 ' north
of the Boeing Bridge. .
4. Legal Description : A detailed legal
description is available
on file in the Renton
Planning Dept .
S. Size of Property : 1 .62 acres
6. Access :Via Airport Way
7. Existing Zoning: P-1, Public Use District
8. Existing Zoning in the Area : P-1, Public Use District
9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi-Public
10 . Notification : The applicant was
notified in writing.
of the hearing date. Notice
was properly published in
the Seattle Times on April
9, 1980 and posted,
in three places on or near
the site as required by
City Ordinance. on
April 11 , 1980 .
C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The subject site was part of the original plat of the
City of Renton . A Shoreline Management Substantial
Development Permit was issued for the subject property
on November 9 , 1978 .
D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1 . Topography : The subject site is essentially level .
2. Soils : Urban Land (Ur) . This soil is land that
has been modified by disturbance of the natural
layers with the addition of fill up to several
feet thick to accommodate industry or housing.
r
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : FANCHER FLYWAYS, SA-024-80
APRIL 22 , 1980
PAGE TWO
3 . Vegetation : The scrub grass along the river bank
near the east side of the subject site is the only
significant remaining natural vegetation .
4. Wildlife : Very little of the subject site is suitable
for wildlife habitat .
5 . Water : The Cedar River is adjacent to the subject
site on the east.
6. Land Use : The site is presently utilized for airplane
taxiways and tiedowns.
E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :
The surrounding properties are all aviation oriented
with most space utilized for hangers , taxiways, and
runways. There are two storage buildings for private
airplanes located on the northern property line.
F . PUBLIC SERVICES :
1 . Water and Sewer: An 8" water main extends east-west
on Airport Way approximately 1/4 mile south of
the subject site and a12" main runs north-south
on Rainier Avenue North. A 24" sanitary sewer
runs north-south approximately 600 ' south of the
property and the Metro gravity line is approximately
300 ' southest .
2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Fire Departmen
pursuant to ordinance requirements.
3 . Transit : Not applicable .
4. Schools: Not applicable.
5. Recreation : Not applicable .
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONIINIG CODE:
1 . Section 4-710-4, Review of Municipal Improvements.
2 . Section 4-710 , Public Use District .
H. APPLICABLE SECTIONIS OF THE COIHPREHENISIVE PLAN OR OTHER
OFFICIAOL CITY DOCUMENT:
1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Objective 6, page 18.
2 . Shoreline Master Program, City of Renton .
I . IMPACT OF THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENIVIRONNENIT :
1 . Natural Systems : Minor .
2 . Population/Employment : Minor .
3. Schools : Not applicable.
4. Social : Not applicable .
5 . Traffic : Minor .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : FANCHER FLYWAYS, SA-024-80
APRIL 22 , 1980
PAGE THREE
J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance
and the State Environmental Policy' Act of 1971 , as amended ,
RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been
prepared for the subject proposal . Thisris based upon
provision of suitable landscaping to buffer and reduce
the potential impact of structures and pavement areas
per approval of the Planning Department together with
the provision of suitable drainage plans and traffic
control measures per Public Works Department approval .
K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED :
1 . City of Renton Building Division .
2. City of Renton Engineering Division.
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division.
4. City. of Renton Utilities Division.
5. City of Renton Fire Department .
L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS :
1. The subject proposal is consistent with the public
use designation of the:;land use element of the
City ' s Comprehensive Plan, the existing zoning
and the Airport Master Plan.
2. The subject proposal included the construction
of 2-hangers totaling 15, 820 square feet of space
for the storage of 13 aircraft. Two tiedown areas
are proposed which will provide approximately 10-12
spaces.
3. The use proposed is compatable and directly dependent
upon the facilities of the City of Renton Airport .
Immediately north of the subject site, Airport
Specialties is constructing similar airplane storage
hangers under Substantial Development Permit SM-35-75
and Site Approval SA-829-75 .
4. The subject site plan proposed complies with the
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM-64-78)
that was issued by the City of Renton on November
9 , 1978 which became valid on December 5, 1978.
5. The landscaping plan as submitted addresses the
site area of the lease. The Shoreline Management
Permit required that 10 feet of landscaping be
placed off the site on the east side of the. roadway. .
The, plant materials suggested around the hangers
are appropriate and appear to be of adequate size.
The plant materials planted on the east: side of
the road should follow the same theme approved
for Airport Specialties.
6. The necessary fire flows for the facility will
be provided, when the Airport constructs a new water
main along the eastern boundary of the subject
site. The Fire Department has requested that two
fire hydrants be placed within 150 feet of the
hanger structures.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: FANCHER FLYWAYS , SA-024-80
APRIL 22 , 1980
PAGE FOUR
7. Grading and storm drainage plans will have to be
approved by the Public Works Department prior to
the issuance of a building permit .
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that the request for site plan approval
File Number SA-024-80, as requested by Fancher Flyways
be approved subject to the following conditions :
1 . That detailed landscaping plans for the 10-foot
landscaping strip east of the access road be approved
by the Planning Department prior to issuance of
a building permit . (The theme is to follow that
approved for Airport Specialties. )
2. That the water main extension be completed prior
to occupancy of the structures.
3. Approval of grading and storm drainage plans by
the Public Works Department prior to issuance of
a building permit .
2
0
3
4 t...
x
c• 14.AZ11I/.11114•WAr
I t$3)
V'
r.:
i....
r
I flit-,0
I
I
1 I. I
e_.
17.d.e•'
l
i
1
I I .0 1, i t••\
S\
i
PE1407‘,E. fatl*A111$14 81-11i•.- i
1"•• .
1 c ie---
1 ..... 1" & .;i. 1 - v`.1.A I ..---'-;. .,
4! ' A .;PPI A I •$../. C•I• ,ri„ -- -....
s.-.
I
I
i 1.... I
T.
t: 1*____F,
ip 1 i 1 71..7....- I :
I 1
I\i
1.1 li A. 1J Ci e W.I
Ili
1 1 ' .1i I
ii..
1..• - :."."--7------ ---0, ais N 47.
1;Ili I 05 ;. .
i 1 V Is%
i'l E 4% .. •-• ,' ' \-\
to
e•
4
VII
0.
47. 0, C4
T A* II - Ae A.1- . -.. ... ... . ....... •...
v ,-
4 i -C
tli
t 17 32 C .
t'..
i 1
i13" A I. 17 1.1•II.•T %v/ a" e• 2 ----/ \, t•
r • -4 .1 ..- .
linf'' 2 h
10 i . • c 4.•\ •• •
A \
i.
I..
gle5Teli. licli.144E.pt. \ • •la 1
1..10. c. I AII
c.; .I i4,•i
1 •
1.-.....I 1$,
i
1 1 •-- • • • • I 1.. I 1 IZ:likb
Is......‘74 I ..
i I
4+6
4
r
1 C''' I.
I
III.kr 401111P..-7.r. .
4-, .•..\!' • .
I1 f."vr : - •
4t..1...7U -nr..A.c,ts 1.I r. ----'
1 " t; ••••--.....
G,
V' t,
11
re,
t•
rA xi.‘v Ay .---:
tt , . As.r.141:4•LT. • met d•t'-d.g. —7 -
IN,/ i
4,...X,‘ 13'
14
At
I
k. ,.
T.I 811 ••• 0./9 ii.e..1.1..:.__..----,-,=.-e.:..-..:.; :A. IL; ....-
4.•‘....
t1/4,
ak
t. -4.
Is,E
rx...I r wrAy: .. ••••-- . •
kh
1 T!ii II kir\7. Alr•IALT w/4" 4.r. ---e
411\
I 1
I
71.-.....4411TAI,•
i •
e
o
c• r I.r.- f,,y iv.u . .._-.
i.ta.
1 ... - . '
0f'r/j®Planning
12-1979
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Appli cats n oa iwBOt +/ 4stot®EP4 TOP et. AQ idas-
the JbW1, (dLC,'l,'It $. •
Location: Re..efori MU1'1tet pc( 741.t'p r't (ve Lase-Aevi j
Applicant ) / *,tèAr Alyivaltv
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : '1//S/8e
Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE : Ws3/8A2.
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
Engineering t1 :
r, y_J .
r'
r"t
Building Division
1
t
Utilities Engineering a
Fire Department
Other) :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRI O THE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
AT 9;U A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.
IF MURIDEPARTMENTTDIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T ATTEND THE ARC,
PLEA R, VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ze, -s)
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Ap proved
Signature pf,. 1-rector or Authorize Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :VG/,tiR//kje&
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
de, 1 ICZO/i'9 pla'7 7 `7 e-/.77 •=/' /"7/
p/ 5-eperr4
i -
Signature "Director or Aut ized Representative Date
it
a _
80 P 1 an n.i r..g
12-1979
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
App4lication :Si '004/ 3Q(SarAppfePO ar et. A
colic J l,"/,,,. •
Location: Riveter% M IP It ctp"I rlerparat (sr! Lec.eltem inill•Vii
Applicant: . f KCheI' A/rooys
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : lifts' g)
Police Department M.C. MEETING DATE : 713i8G
Public Works Department 451lif—OEngineeringDivision
Traffic Engineering l`E: %. •
2
Z
Building Division 1 ' c- :f
t
v, l/ • q
Utilities Engineering cv `2-Gcd
Fire Department
i
Other) :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRI 0 THE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
AT 9:UO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.
IF UR EPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ AITEND THE ARC.
PLEA4kpRQVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DI'VISION :
E 2n
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
ea&,. f-t7 i2 u ik6-C.i , 7/e /1-4 if cele 01 of 7W6 4.i.vii c
ca+CG , 1€L-ad A/ST2Aec7e),U C,d&v, mac"-e-cc e ¢,u 12
All i/1 f 12C /t2Slf Z . ,E.-i/e " .C4o z ©4./.".e. *v f=o.c 7-.is
EY,4,0,OE/a'/eNT is zso a ie-, l ',r. Tt a f y G"y A//7"S
LOG.42Tl) 4.,,JJ --ise/dt,J /Sd " .o 7-}i.e. S7-/2dC 7-!/4eEz. Cf hy;)
r-r- (
1-
1-.1"-"----Z--- 3/ /G
ignature of Director o-r A horized Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIIVISION : 1.171i,irf
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
41x j(. ,c -lv A")r.23 %,,.,o-ri:.2.hn Luc ( .44,S
Cii
01) 4-19 v
Signature if Director or Authorized Representative Date
4:1127/80 Planning
12-1979
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application :49i -OaY•8O(Si4& rt.va TOE"_ a. Agutj.cr
yeee JM $ E*C..'l,'/Ie$.
Location: Re.. ! M
m l l l u it tC tpaI Aerpo r' (ee 1pe dt'm 1/0)
Applicant: F .ic.her ihlivays
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ` iS/80
Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE : 913/130.
Public Works Department
En ineering Division
Traffic Engineering
V (j i r 91, \\
Building Division r,-15';ii_• i')
Utilities'. Engineering f
Fire Department a`
Other) :
d/
COMMENTS. OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRI G FO THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
34205 AT 9:UO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.
IF UR 'DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T A TEND THE ARC,
PLEAV, ,RQVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 7:OU P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : rag
X Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
11/`ii7a/ / r Gcf id.4 s'-wya,.-efs -/,, 9'4.d ' e
1 -4 57 " -------,------7 .--------- 4_,A-c,
c !
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ji- _ 1
Approved Approved with Conditions?C) Not Approved
7 L --
e..,,-4-4-'u------- -- 3 -- ,2, 2--.0C-
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
PROPOSED/FIN DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANt.c/huN-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No... SM-64-78
PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No. ECF-374-78 O FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Construct a tee hangar and tie down facilities
at the Renton Municipal Airport
Proponent Fancher Flyways, Inc. , P.O.Box 412, Renton, WA 98055
Location of Proposal Renton Municipal Airport- (Fancher Flyways lease
known as Parcel No. 1 & 2)
Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal has been determined to have ® not have asignificantadverseimpactupontheenvironment. An EIS ispaisnotrequiredunderRCW43. 21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision wasmaaafterreviewbytheleadagencyofacompletedenvironmentalchecklistandotherinformationonfilewiththeleadagency .
Ion-
Reasons for declaration of environmental significance :
This declaration is based upon provision of suitable landscaping to
buffer and reduce potential impact of structures and pavement areas
per approval of the Planning Department, together with provision of
suitable drainage plans and traffic control measures per Public Works
Department approval.
Measures , if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitigate theenvironmentalimpactstosuchanextentthattheleadagencywouldwithdrawitsdeclarationofsignificanceandissuea (proposed/final )declaration of non-significance :
Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen
Title Plann' D. eet.r Date November 9, 1978
Signature _Air L., 1`
City of Renton,
PlanningDepartment
5-76
e
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING
EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ,
CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON APRIL 22 , 1980, AT 9 :00
A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION :
1. FANCHER FLYWAYS , INC . , APPLICATION FOR SITE
APPROVAL=-TO-CONS-TRUCT TWO LIGHT AIRCRAFT
HANGARS - I-N--P=1 ZONE , File SA-024-80 ;,fproperty
located on east side of Renton Municipal Airport
approximately 1 , 000 feet north of the Boeing
Bridge .
Legal description of files noted above are on file in the
Renton Planning Department .
ALL ' INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE
PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 22 , 1980, AT 9 :00
A.M . TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS .
PUBLISHED : April 9 , 1980 GORDON Y . ERICKSEN,
RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
I , STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE
ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to
before me , a Notary Public, in
and[ for the State of Washington
residing in King County, on the
3rd day ,of April .
SIGNED:e 2net.#241)1
t,
OF R
1
THE CITY OF RENTON
U Z.
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
oNAL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
90 CO' 235- 2550
O P
1TF0 SEPT
April 3 , 1980
Fancher Flyways, Inc .
Renton Municipal Airport
243 W . Perimeter Road
P . 0 . Box 412
Renton , Washington 98055
Re : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT TWO
LIGHT AIRCRAFT HANGARS IN P-1 ZONE , File SA-024-80 ;
property located on east side of Renton Municipal
Airport approximately 1, 000 feet north of the
Boeing Bridge
Dear Ms . Rendon :
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on March 27, 1980 . A public hearing
before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for
April 22 , 1980 , at 9 : 00 a . m . Representatives of the applicant
are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited
to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions ,
please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 .
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y. Ericksen ,
Planning Director
Roger. J . Blaylock ticL.,
Associate Planner
cc : Gerda Wirz
P. 0 . Box 412
Renton , WA 98055
1
r,k"A x' 'na.e " ''
p i i.
me ,, 'I `
3
t,i
r'
F
a i+:
ill:fir_.
ns. 5 . 9
j;.
irr i
1
I Tyt,W
GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS:
PROPERTY LOCATED ON EAST SIDE OF RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET NORTH OF THE BOEING BRIDGE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT .
I
I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF
u LIC HEA ,,,, 1NG
TO BE HELD
IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING
ON APRIL 22, 1980 BEGINNING AT 9:00 AM A.M.
CONCERNING ITEM Z
III ROEREZO
1
1111 S $ ECL PE . MIT
Iif
71 #.,,
mj'4 1 i
r
k; r TO CONSTRUCT TWO LIGHT
r ' k;
F F. °•- L AIRCRAFT HANGARS IN P-1
ZONE
III 1 ' tA 14
S e LI `: EE MA AGEMENT PERMIT
NI
F•`'° FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE RE VED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
I
PROPOSED/FINAL LcVLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/hvN-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No... sM-64-78
PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No. ECF-374-78 O FINAL Declaration1
Description of proposal Construct a tee hangar and tie down facilities
at the Renton Municipal Airport
Proponent Faucher Flyways, Inc. , P.O.Box 412, Renton, WA 98055
Location of Proposal Renton Municipal Airport- (Faucher Flyways lease
known as Parcel No. 1 & 2)
Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have asignificantadverseimpactupontheenvironment. An EIS 0 iscgisnotrequiredunderRCW43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision wasmaaafterreviewbytheleadagencyofacompletedenvironmentalchecklistandotherinformationonfilewiththeleadagency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental significance :
This declaration is based upon provision of suitable landscaping to
buffer and reduce potential impact of structures and pavement areas
per approval of the Planning Department, together with provision of
suitable drainage plans and traffic control measures per Public works
Department approval.
Measures , if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitigate theenvironmentalimpactstosuchanextentthattheleadagencywouldwithdrawitsdeclarationofsignificanceandissuea (proposed/final )declaration of non-significance :
Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen
Title P1ann' D , eet•r Date November 9, 1978
Signature
v
City of Renton
Planning DepartmentcTr
1
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
PERMIT
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
FANCIER FLYWAYS, INC.
Application No. SM- 64-78 Applicant
P.O.Box 412, Renton, WA 98055
Tee hangar & tie down facilities)
Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms
and conditions:
1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act
of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with
federal , state, and other permit requirements.
2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to section 14 (7) of the
Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee
fails, to comply with any condition hereof.
1. A construction permit shall not be issued until thirty (30) .
days' °after approval by the City of Renton Planning Department
or until any review Proceedings initiated within this 30 day
review period have been completed.
4 . Pursuant to Section 14 , Chapter 286 , Laws of 1971 Extra Session,
the City of Renton has taken the following actions :
A. Pcx ) Approved
B. ( ' ) Denied
C. Reasons :
i
I
D. Conditions:
1. The ten foot lease setback from the top of the river bank shall
be maintained in its natural state.
2. The lease area shall be planted in accordance with Exhibit "A" of the
landscape plan to provide a minimum ten foot landscape area adjacent
to the ten foot lease setback line mentioned above. Such landscaping
shall be subject to final approval of the Renton Planning Department.
3. Detailed drainage plans shall be submitted to and approved by the
Public Works Department, and shall include adequate oil/water
separation facilities.
4. Grading plan to be submitted and approved by the Public Works Dept.,
Engineering Division.
5. Fire hydrants, fire flows, and access for fire apparatus to be provided
per Renton Fire Department's approval.
6. Approval is subject to approval of other local, state and federal
agencies having jurisdiction.
L9 d —. , 416164...44. November 9, 1978
e..
on Y. Er- •1rse , Planning Director DATE:
Departmen, of Ecology
Attorney eneral's Office
Dept! 'of Public Works; Engineering Div. &
Building Division
Applicant , City of Renton
IPlanning Department
Rev. 1-77
1
1
2
0 1›.0
4 4-"IN4, kx
0
vottl %...z,
k
reign 4.
4 ..- „. .
d
ck...
1r I d
iva i•
0. 1 •
I 1II,
9'•I
4. . .
1 •
i
lm
i 1
1 74.eq. it CY''•
1
I 1
1 •
I-
1 i.. ¢E1107viL riti4.1444 HLPet.c
h.sAti.
A .....v4AL ....,./ G.'', e ?A• - ' ',....• 5. 1 \ I
I:
r- i>
17 1..•' ..itt... • ••.-
I,' I •
r
t
I, I I •
44. ID1J
1
14 A 14 li',4 E IL 1.1 . JI It1
r____!
U.- ._.,L
tit 1, 1
i I I II 1 1
i \‘‘ ,.
r• ,. It .' kl • .
l o • g4 t
ti...
I1VM.
4, • •,••. .
T,•
rI":‘
y-)•• .--:"
I.•.'.:
e.."7A-.in1r•q r-
4P.i.•
qfh•i . \•;•.
r- C4 r
1i1 . '
r t it i; ci ea
C. g --"? ...r r :.4 4 ••- ,.,..-
Z
z.
1.13,3 I alo,'•tie'
h ... . 1 Is . .. •.•t .
r •
N. a m...-- loop-- 4, : 1 .
k.
N
it) ,11-• -:,1%. 1 :'• ' I
lievrev. •Iii•age.it. \ . • ..
t:....
t
t _.....
1
i 1.1,,. 1 • A
131 • k 4 .. , c.., ... .• _ ..._., I .. , . i.
I i 7.71- . • :- - ; .-Ifi 0i
P
k I e4.•Lap t1.1.4.'XI Sea S ..
d.."
Air
4 vs • • .
IVI. : ' • 4.1.4 OUT- &AC-tl. 1-y r..07 . -. •4.1 .,
4t. i A 11
1 "lit 4.........
4.
11% .•
1
k„\.% - • .- ••-• •• - : •-- T TA Ir I•AO .Ayr''''
t .
4'-‘. I .
T.......•.-.1-11.
2•
11-
4-•_•A•,
S1-.7.
FrA,-
m.
A.
e.-:_LisT1...-••--M4•.
V":::=.
1d-
e-.
4t:.---
G..:..r
A......•.-„.1.-.1...-.-
7...-• •• ..
N,.
I ..V.
T\
i\
I.
I
I
i
1\
N.X.
4.C••••-TAN 1 -
1. 1c!ilb r r 4 A LT AV 4 " G7 _ A.r-lr-A
1
a %
tr
I
1,• itO
i .p!ijr_. .:. •
s•
cs I ria- De,1‘., iJ ...... - ' 7--.:........AS...P.e,A, _ .J
1
7•
1
1
1,8TATR,
1
STATE OF
s WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
1350.150th Amine N.E.Redmond.Washington 11062 2%y/Rs1900Y
r..ti*° Pixy Lee Ray
Governor
November 16, 1978
City of Renton
Planning Department
200 Mill Ave., South
Renton, Washington 980SS
Dear Mr./Ms.:
Re: COUNTY: KING
APPLICANT: FANCRER FLYWAYS INC.,
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT #N 2127-17-A-(SM-64-78)
Construction of 2 T-Hangers and aircraft 4ie down
parking ramps. -
The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit
was received by this office on November 14, 1978 , The review
period by the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's
Office will terminate 30 days from the above date.
If no notice of appeal is received, construction pursuant to the
permit may commence following expiration of the review period;provided, however, all other federal, state, and local laws
regulating such construction have been complied with.
Sin ke1 ,
Resource Management
NORTHWEST REGIONAL OFFICE
NJ:sb
cc:Fancher Flyways.
Rkj
EalR5Div • fv-
R: Laee :cfA0V _ 20 19I8 _
F1;4e.P•RT DiR .
s?
ECY 050-1-28
N
NG DEpP`
Rev. 6/78
FRS
CITY OF RENTON RFC/Eb '®
APPLICATION 1 MAR 14 /980
SITE APPROVAL
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY gbEP
File No . SA- Oc7-51,,?1) Filing Date
Application Fee $ Receipt No .
Environmental Review Fee $
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :
1 . Name FANCHER FLYWAYS, INC. Phone 226-6170
Address RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
2 . Property location EAST SIDE OF RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT, JUST NORTH OF THE
3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary)
BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE
CONFINES OF THE RENTON AIRPORT, RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, TO WIT: THAT AREA COM-
PRISING THE EAST SIDE AIR PARK (PARCEL 1'B") AND ADJACENT -AREA (PARCEL "A") DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF THE MAIN RFNTON AIRFIFIO RUNWAY
REFERRED TO AS STATION 0+00; THENCE N. 4 49' 43" W. ALONG SAID
TH
ENTERLINE A DISTANCE OF
ENC€ CONTINUINGNG N. 8V 10' 17" E. A U 15 I ANLU
OF 169.75 FEET; THENCE S. 130 55' 07" E. A DISTANCE OF 361.24 FEET; THENCE S. 850 12' 02"
W. A DISTANCE OF 226.82 FEET; THENCE N. 40 49' 43" W. A DISTANCE OF 356.59 FEET TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING
TOTAL AREA (PARCELS "A" AND "B"): 70,715.96 SQUARE FEET
TOGETHER WITH THE PRIVILEGE 01- LESSEE TO USE THE PUBLIC PORI I ON 01- [HL K 1 KF'OK I, 1 NL Luu 1 I
RUNWAY AND OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES PROVIDED THEREON, ON A NON-EXCLUSIVE BASIS, AND SUBJECT
TO SUCH RULES AND REGULATIONS AS NOW EXIST OR MAY HEREAFTER BE PROMULGATED BY THE LESSOR
FROM TIME TO TIME, AND FURTHER SUBJECT TO ALL SUCH NONDISCRIMINATORY CHARGES AND FEES FOR
SUCH USE AS MAY BE ESTABLISHED FROM TIME TO TIME BY THE LESSOR.
4 . Number of acres or square feet 1.62 ACRES Present zoning
5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? TWO LIGHT AIRCRAFT HANGARS
OF PREFABRICATED STEEL BUILDINGS
6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application :
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks ,
Scale
existing structures , easements , and other
factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 '
B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 '
C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning
on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 '
D. Building height and area (existing and proposed)
7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION :
Date Approved
Date Denied
Date Appealed
Appeal Action
Remarks
Planning Dept.
Rev, 1-777
i
Ab t/ /
L • '
a,)
LEAST. AGREL.MLN I pt
Kity of Rutin:, to I.,nclr.r flvway., inc.)I w'
0
IRIS INUEIITURL OF l.LA',f, cr.ccut J :n lripl iwt. , cl Iccl ivt as v <s
d" `,'7
A.rynst I, 1978, by and hetwc,en the Clf, OF .RENTON. a nutl.icipal corp? atron, Lu .
heroi rafter raIerr.d to as Lessor; and FANNER FIYWA'S, INC., a Washiuccor to)1Iab q
cor;.orat ion, hereFnal ter r•.lerred to as Lessee: t,
d,.
ar,y
W1TNESSETN: J.
s\,
17/I . In consideration'of the covenants and agreements of the Lessee. prEl P`':
Ir:9reinafter set forth, Lessor dues hereby (ease and demise unto Lessee the
following described parcel of real estate accepted by the lessnc. in .its "as-is"
condition icing located within the confines of the Renton Airp,rt , Renton.
King Cou.ity, Washington, to-wit:
That area• comprising the East Side Air Park (Parcel "B") and
adjacent area (Parcel "A") described as follows:
1 Begir,niny at a point on the centerline of the Main Renton
Airfield Runway referred to as Station 0+00; thence N. 4° 49'
43" W. along said centerline a distance of 2.644.00 feet; thence N. 85"10' 17" E. a distance of 350 feet to the true point of beginning;
thence continuing N.• 855 10' 17" f-. a distance of 169.75 feet;
thence S. I3' 55' Oj" t.: a-cfist-il;c•• of 361-•24 Feet
t.: thence S. 85" 12' 02" W. a di
arce of 226:82 feet; thence N. 4` 49' 43" W.,a distance of 356.55
Peet to the true point of beginning.r
r-
4)TOTAL. AREA (Parcels "A" and "B") : 70,715.96 square feet1.,...
To :then with the privilege of Lessee to use •[he public portion
of the airport, including runway and other public Iacililics pro-
vided thereon, on a non-exclusive basis, aed subject to such rules
and regulations as now exist or may hereafter be promulgated by
Ole !.essor from time to time, aed further Subject to all such
nondiscriminatory charges and fees for such use as may be eetab-•
fished from time to time by tree Lessor.
or, the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth tor a period of thirty years
commencig on the first day of August, 1978, and terminating u- the ! Tarty-airs_
day of July, 2008. Lessee is hereby given the option in the last ycer of said
1
term to re-•_w this lease fur a further ten (10) year period, provided 0r.1
Lessee has then fully and faiti.fu' ly complied with all the terms and condi-
tions herein contained, which renewal period shall be upon the same terms and
conditions as hereinafter set forth except that Lessor reserves the right to
renegotiate the rental each five (5) year period of the extended lease. Written
notice of Lessee's 'irrtenciun to exercise this option must. I,c given to the City
Clerk of the City of Renton not less than sixty '(60) days prior to the end of
the -term. , Time Is u_f the essence hereof. Exercise of--this Op, ion -iss.roject- - -
I-
CITY OF RENTON, WASH I NGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ii''`,' - t_+/r`
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Application No. s.1111r61'1- 7 -
y '
I.ir:at • ';
Environmental Checklist No.
PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: /®®9-7
Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS:
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state ,and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question:
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent ]ANCFJER. FLYUAY; INC.
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
n r7/LT' m _",off 1'19- .6uTTON, TM. 96055 226-6170
3: Date Checklist submitted
4: Agency requiring Checklist RE c`JT ON, S !OREL INE PIA NAGE1IL;ATT
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature):
APPROXIMATELY 71 , 000 S. 1. AREA F'OR AIRCRAFT TEE HANCARS
AND TIE DOWN PARK I NG RATIPC
2-
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as wellastheextentofthelandareaaffectedbyanyenvironmentalimpacts, includinganyotherinformationneededtogiveanaccurateunderstandingoftheenviron-mental setting of the proposal ) :
L7EPTTON AIRPORT ADJACENT 7'O CEDAR RIVER. CONCRETE TEE
FIANGARS APPROXIMATELY .16 o
HIGH AATD PATTED AIRCRAFT TIE
DOWN PARKING AREA*
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
DEC EMBER ?9,7,9
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposalfederal , state and local --including rezones) :
CITY BUILDING PERMIT
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activityrelatedtoorconnectedwiththisproposal? If yes , explain:
ATO
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the .property covered byyourproposal ? If yes , explain:
IITO
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some futuredate, describe the nature of such application form:
IVONE
II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in :
a) ,'instable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil ? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
VET— MAYBE WU—
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
YET— MAYBE lid
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
Yeitheronoroffthesite?
YES M YBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
Explanation:YES MAYBE A
B COVERAGE., OF SOIL BY BUILDINGS A•TD PATTING.
3-
2) A,ir. Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? X
YES MK- bil
b) The creation of objectionable odors?
YET— MA BT n u
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either locally or
regionally?
VET— MAYBE AU
Explanation:
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of . .
water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X
YET— MA E NU—
b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
YES MAYBE
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
YES MAYBE O—
M Change in the amount of surface water in any water
Dody?
M YBE NO
e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
Yr MAYBE ii
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?YET— MAYBE 0—
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
interception of an' aquifer by cuts or excavations?
X
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water• quality, either through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria,
or other substances into the ground waters?
YET— MAYBE KU—
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water, supplies?YE's- MAYBE, AU—
Explanation:
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:-
a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any
species of; flora (including trees, shrubs , grass, crops ,
X
nicroflora and aquatic plants)? YEE— WET A15—
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
X
endangered species of flora?
YEr" MAYBE MU—
c) Introducti"on of new species of flora into an area, or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X
species?
YET- MAYBE NU—
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
K
YET MAYBE W-
Explanation: A) GR.fSS
4-
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)?X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
Xendangeredspeciesoffauna?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna? r
yr WAYSE NO
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
VS MAYBE NO
Explanation:
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
X
glare?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
X
present or planned land use of an area?
YTS- MAYBE NO
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
YES MAYBE NO
ll
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
YES M YBE NO
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) Y1
in the event of an accident or upset conditions?
VES MAYBE NU—
Explanation:
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area?
Yam- MAYBE W
Explanation:
5-
T
12) Housing. Will t.:_ droprosal affect existing housing, _.
4 create a demand for additional housing? l
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand
for'new parking?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
YAK— MAYBE N(
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
t,
movement of people and/or goods? A
YES- MAYBE— NO
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? __ X
YET— MAYBE NO
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
V MAYBE trii—
Explanation:
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
a) . Fire protection?
YES MAYBE N5—
b) Police protection?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Schools?X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities . including roads? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services? X
YES FITYITsf NO
Explanation:.
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in :
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
X
YES MAYBE N6-
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
Xthedevelopmentofnewsourcesofenergy?
YES MAYBE 0—
Explanation:
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas?
X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Communications systems?
3,
YES M YBE NO
c) Water? f
YES MAYBE NO
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks? JC
YES MAYBE NO
e) Storm water drainage? X
YES MAYBE WO—
f) Solid waste and disposal? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? X
Vim— MAYBE TO--
Explanation:
18) ,Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
YES MMAYBE Ta—
r
Explanation:
i
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building?
VEB MAYBE NO
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent: ji /' 's gned)
S /1//e eN v L%
name printefd)
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
ND
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
4 . "