HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA80-027BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE MICROFILMED
SA
O78O
OF 124,4,
nr o THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
mm. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR e LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
P CO-
FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593Po
SEP EoeP
May 28, 1980
Mr. Bill Sill
The Boeing Company
P.O. Box 3999, M.S. 14-41
Seattle, WA 98124
RE: File No. SA-027-80; The Boeing Company; Request for Site
Approval .
Dear Mr. Sill :
This is to notify you that the above referenced request , which was
approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of
May 13, 1980, has not been appealed within the time period
established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered
final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date
for permanent filing.
Sincerely,
CCS1.4-,-
Fred J . Kaufman
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department
City Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King
Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon
oath disposes and states:
That on thel3th day of May 1980 , affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope
containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid,
addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled
application or petition.
e441+75 ?76ge?2; mmef__
Subscribed and sworn this 0- day of M e„r
19
k3CkLs(- \
r\
f\ • kW s
Notary Public in and for the: State`
of Washington, residing at Renton
Application, Petition or Case: The Boeing Company; SA-027-80
The nu.nute4 contain a £,idt ob the pahtLe6 of necond)
May 13, 1980
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING. EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
APPLICANT: The Boeing Company FILE NO. SA-027-80
LOCATION: Vicinity of 800 S.W. 43rd Street.
SUMMARY OF ''REQUEST: The applicant requests site plan approval-to permit the
installation of a "trailer for •use•as a dispatch office.
SUMMARY OF 'ACTION: • Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions.
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT .The Planning Department preliminary report was received by
REPORT: the Examiner on April 23, 1980.
PUBLIC HEARING:After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information "on file with the application, and field
checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner
conducted a public. hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on April 29, 1980 at 10:15 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building.
Parties wishing to testify were affirmed" by the Examiner.
It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the
Planning Department report. Steve Munson, Planning Department, reviewed the report and
entered the! following exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #1: Application File containing Planning Department
report and other pertinent documents
Exhibit #2: Site Plan as submitted
Mr. Munson corrected an error in Section C. , History/Background; of the Planning Department
report and revised the annexation date. of the property from 1979 to 1959.
The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in the recommendations of the Planning
Department.' Responding was:
Bill Sill
The Boeing Company
P.O. Box 3999, M.S. 14-41
Seattle, •WA 98124
Mr. Sill indicated concurrence in the Planning Department. report. The Examiner inquired
regarding the nature .of exterior treatment of the facility and if the proposed trailer
will be located on wheels as denoted in the diagram, Exhibit #2. Mr. Sill advised that
the trailer: would not be situated on wheels but would be blocked up in accordance with
the Uniform Building Code, and exterior treatment would conform•to exteriors of existing
buildings on the site.
The Examiner requested further testimony in support or opposition to the application.
There was no response. He then asked the Planning Department for final comments. Since
there were no further comments, the hearing regarding File No. SA-027-80 was closed by the
Examiner at 10:25 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner
now,makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The request is for. approval of a site plan to install amodified travel trailer for use
as a dispatch office.
2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning
Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit-#1
SA-027-80 Page Two
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy ,Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended a Declaration of Non-Significance has
been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible
official.
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact iof this development.
5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed.
6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity.
7. The proposal' is compatible with the required setbacks; lot coverage and height
requirements of Section 4-730 '(M-P; 'Manufacturing Park) of Title IV, Ordinance No.
1628, Code of General Ordinances.
8. The subject site was annexed into the city in April, 1959. The property was classified
M-P in two stages, one portion in 1959 and the-;.remainder in 1975. The site was filled
to raise it above the Green River flood levels and the site plan for the existing warehous
complex was approved by the Hearing Examiner on May 9, 1978.
9. The Comprehensive Plan and the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan designate the area
in which the subject property is .located as 'suitable for the development of manufacturing
park type uses.
10. The subject site is currently occupied by the Boeing Company. The site is developed
with large .warehouse structures.
11. The applicant proposes locating permanently on site• a 10 foot by 32 foot trailer for
use as ,a dispatch.office. The structure will be constructed by Porta House, Inc. and
is a prebuilt facility which will .be permanently anchored to the ground.
12. The trailer will be located- on the site between what are commonly known as buildings
1 and 2 at the north end of the site adjacent'to S.W. 41st St.
13. The complexes' existing treatment is uniform and the Planning Department indicated that
the addition should match the existing design.
14. The parking spaces which would be eliminated by .the new structure will be accommodated
on theinorth side of building 3. There will be no loss of required parking.
CONCLUSIONS•
1. The plans the applicant submitted appear, to satisfy the goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan and the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan.
2. The applicant indicated that the trailer would be finished in the same exterior
treatment as the existing treatment of the existing structures, and therefore, the
new addition will blend in with the existing complex.
3. The proposal is consistent with the provisions of Section -4-730.020.3 of the zoning
code which permits the siting of accessory buildings,on'site with the principle use.
The dispatching office is a use which is customarily incident to warehousing operations
carried on by the applicant at this location.
4. The installation of trailer type structures and'additional "accessory" buildings and
structures may lead to overcrowding of the site and could jeopardize the integrity of
the goals and objectives of the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan which provides
for the, establishment of large amounts of landscaping scattered throughout the site
to minimize the impact of the development; aesthetically pleasing architectural . .
treatments of buildings; and screeing of. "less aesthetic uses". so that- they are not
visible, to the passing public.
Specifically, "design standards should be established to insure high quality
development"; and "development should occur in a logical, systematic manner to prevent
the premature expansion of utilities 'and minimize the possibilities of vacant parcels
occurring." Development in a systematic manner would include recognizing when a site
or facility, has been outgrown rather than overburdening the site with additional
accessory structures. Therefore, further addition- to the •site should be reviewed by
the Hearing Examiner to determine its compatibility to. the zoning code as true
accessory uses". and its compatibility with the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan.
SA-027-80 Page Three
DECISION: '
The site plans for the dispatch office are approved subject to:
1. The installed trailer shall be finished and have an exterior treatment which is
compatible and blends in with the existing facility; and '
2. ' Any further additions to the site shall be subject to review by .the Hearing Examiner.
ORDERED THIS 13th day of May, 1980.
Fred J. Ka an
Land Use He ring Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS.13th'day of May, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of
record:
Bill Sill, The Boeing Company, F.O. Box 3999, M.S. 14-41, •
Seattle, WA 98124
TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of May, 1980 to the following:
i
Mayor Barbara. Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
Gordon Y. Ericksen,' Planning Director
Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman
Ron Nelson, Building Division
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Pursuant to Title. IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before May 27, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error
in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at
the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen
14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the
specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the
record, take further action as he deers proper. •
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that
such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying-a filing 'fee of $25.00 and meeting
other specified requirements. Copies'of this ordinance 'are available for inspection in
the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same maybe purchased at cost in said
department.; '
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEAiSING EXAMINER
APRIL 29 , 1980
PUBLIC HEARING
I
APPLICANT : THE BOEING COMPANY
FILE NUMBER : SA-027-80
A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The applicant requests site plan approval to permit
the installation of a trailer for use as a dispatch
office . (Site development map attached. )
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. • Owner of Record: JACK BENAROYA COMPANY
2. Applicant : THE BOEING COMPANY
3. Location : Vicinity of 800 S .W.
Vicinity Map Attached) 43rd Street .
4. Legal Description : A detailed legal
description is available
on file in the Renton
Planning Department .
5 . Size of Property: 500 sq. ft . directly
affected.
6. Access :Via S .W. 43rd Street.
7. Existing Zoning : M-P , Manufacturing
Park .
8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : M-P , . Manufacturing
Park .
9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park.
10. Notification : The applicant was
notified in writing
of the hearing date.
Notice was properly
published in the
Seattle Times on
April 10, 1980, and
posted in three places
on or near the site
as required by City
ordinance on April
11 , 1980.
C . HISTORY/OAACISGROUNIR-:
The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance
1743 of April 15, 1979. It was rezoned on December
24, 1959, and December 8, 1975, by ordinance 2533 and
Ordinance 2992 respectively. The site subsequently
was filled and site plan approval granted by the Hearing
Examiner on May 9, 1978, for the existing warehouse
facility.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : APRIL 29, 1980
THE BOEING COMPANY, SA-027-80
PAGE TWO
D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1. Topography: The site is generally level .
2 . Soils: Urban land (Ur) . This is soil that has
been modified by disturbance of the natural layers
with additions of fill material several feet thick
to accommodate large industrial and housing installa-
tions. The erosion hazard is slight to moderate .
No capability or woodland classification.
3. Vegetation : Some landscaping has been installed
between the buildings as part of the warehousing
and storage construction.
4. Wildlife: The installed landscaping may provide
some habitat for birds and small mammals.
5 . Water: no surface water was observed on the subject
site (April 11, 1980) .
6. Land Use : Warehousing and storage uses presently
occupy the subject site . Similar commercial and
industrial development is taking place on adjacent
properties.
E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :
Surrounding properties are of similar warehousing , storage ,
and industrial natures.
F. PU 'LIC SERVICES :
1 . Water and Sewer: A Metro sewer interceptor is
located along S .W. 43rd Street as well as a 12"
water main, and the Springbrook Creek drainage
channel abuts the northwest corner of the subject
site.•
2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Depart-
ment as per ordinance requirements .
3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #155 operates along
S.W. 43rd Street adjacent to the south property
line of the subject site.
4 . Schools : Not applicable .
5. Recreation : Not applicable .
G. APPLICA;:LE SECTIONS OF TIME ZONING CODE:
1 . Section 4-730 , M-P , Manufacturing Park .
2 . Section 4-722E, Temporary Permits .
H. APPLICAAIE SECTIONS OF. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER
OFFICIAL CITY DOCtU EEiNT:
1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June , 1976.
2 . Soil Conservation Service/City of Renton Joint
Agreement (Resolution 1923) .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO ' THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : APRIL 29 , 1980
THE! BOEING COMPANY, SA-027-80
PAGE THREE
I . IMPACT OF THE (NATURAL OR HUMAN EWIVI63®IWIi EINT :
1. Natural Systems : Minor .
2. Population/Employment : Minor
3. Schools: Not applicable.
4. Social : Minor.
5. Traffic: Minor .
J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DET.E"'WATT I N:
Pursuant to the City of Renton.' s Environmental ordinance
and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended ,
RCW 43-21C, a Declaration of Non-significance has been
issued by the Environmental Review Committee on April
2, 1980.
K. . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED :
1 . City of Renton Building Division
2 . City of Renton Engineering Division
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division
4. City of Renton Utilities Division
5. City of Renton Fire Department
L . PLANNING DEPART'IEMIT '.ANALYSIS:
1. The proposal is consistent with the M-P zoning
and the . Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufac-
turing Park for the subject site.
2. The proposal is to place a 10 foot by 32 foot office
constructed by Porta house , Inc. , which will be
used as a dispatching office. The prebuilt structure
is a permanent building ; therefore , it is not a
temporary modification of the site plan and requires
site plan approval .
3. Buildings 1-3 of Benaroya Industrial Park are
presently occupied by the Boeing Company. The
parking on site is adequate to meet the requirements
of the Parking and Loading ordinance. The three
parking spaces eliminated by the location of the
dispatching office have been added on the northeast
corner of Building #3.
4. The site plan corrects several minor modifications
concerning the location of fences , gate houses
and parking stalls. At the time of consxtruction ,
these modifications were not seen as significant
enough to warrant a new site plan approval .
5. Additional comments of other departments are attached
for consideration.
6. The exterior treatment of the prebuilt structure should
be compatible with the existing complex.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : APRIL 29, 1980
THE BOEING COMPANY, SA-027-80
PAGE FOUR
M. DEPARTMENTALTA L RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Planning Department recommends that the requested
site approval, File No . SA-027-80, be approved subject
to color coordination with the existing complex .
it
i 1 Fl. •. •i II 1 - 11- -
a ,.tj . I r-7 6
1 x g 1 t---_,i
4 • 1 L.:i.!l.-.!"01 f I.L.:• ili.,..* :...i.D, e`;,_.•• ,..1..:-!i ii ,alinti rdr- /Alai& !i_ i_1.11:..:11'. ilL111.u.11:1 !Lit 7 :iii.i .1.---i•:-;.0) \ -...
4: 1 ••-•--________: _ ___1 :____ .______. _... L _ i L_____I . _ :__F-E-_-_,•, /________i- a
f1 -u s.m.calar=REST •-2
0-1--- ___1 F.) r - . - -.4_4- ____;._ 4
1( ..fTr iiiiiiiiriA) j Infirmea-7-irinirnit, ‘,... . •1« ,iiiiiiiii, \..1 lhililillu••iliiiiii,1 k,., 1 Ai . I A I
i..._
4'.• 0 !;:z: --"1 'Zi2d-PVP1+101111, ii !!!!,2"-13-
iLttil Ill ';',..-02k-i.3 L.L1J-9-1kowi:iifl tlicsio.V4' ;1 tr—viiii!ffiri 'Dili'',• Efr.v.0..a.ir) 7---,11
9:4'' a
la -_-.• ,
4 1 ft .
Z's ri• -i, 1 • 17-7-A, 1
iAfg W rfr , - - 1-\• • • • - - . ! p -r- =_ ----s"
1 zfv• •-• 1 f N Evy • 4 ..!,.. 1genunicum._ t.., toff
I igif ilillti 1.26;
w4- 1
t 7141121111:4:441%211441:10115. ..-E 1.7- I
f
s•v'e /109. 17r.8N4 IN& - 7-i
1 -1-
4,! " (rTITT: ------- - ci_.---7-- i ray..4cedo..•sa
A.S2,44 Anew
1171i TUT' , 17Ti --.."1iiiiHii, • WOOED imams 21 CLUMPALCIOVICLY I EILAMC
Ii.-• : -; ••I ionswodr-••sii.0•0
e...s.$111 mot
Pr.:- •yi • • = •-. OAMill CHOP a..44406.....)
itti .:
4:01:
0440.,.
00.--
111:
4,
03•0:
11",
14.
1..
4.1.64-
4.6, . :=..... •...
j...,4.1....are.wash.lis• fr--,k 0„ Woo 4.1.45,1. A.1.444 III ft*4 0 .
ass•ND 81.04.10. 1 WOWS II I.gISZa-...--
VIP- . • I. M! IKOIC.41!..soamodP L
7-- - Ai:* la.t.
P.- . -•• r2 I"•..::. .•.0411044 IMAM Mb . airda44 IMO•SI
Z;1* • 1' E., :— .• .• : 1-----i oaf:Ail ado.Or
4-- si: .71.,,7Ti . a:Tr-IP-4 I— CHIPPINCI L
7gL77. jrz
a
le I if ''' -
52.: . ,N*1.•-:-;"s :.,: ' '• f.i.l• L--...-....
4. ,;
1I.;
e••.
i-„- S
r, _ . .
i.
tL.":'t 1•L',.- . 1 . .i• :' . —---•7----- 4r:'....""1""r 1 --0=----- 71'-• •• " IWO:"
J...7.:;- ••••,-i •
r 1 . citio.,...1 7.-7I I : -3 g-:-, .
T! T--." : "---••"• 2r- 4.__ ..f,........:: .
7 '- • ' i . I 1
iit'4,,. ;:.:"."•:" '
Ur!TT" - .
4
kJI• IIII:12* IV.IIIITILL
et11 i 1 wt..•11,111,111, t".. tliffl'iMILIWIPIIIIIIIIffl;t4-14•41.1ififill:OVIIIIIIlIIIIIrgi ' i II :Lin, , I:I I I 1
II
EL 14FpagerePtuaT
7':••• 7;4V-r-..: :. . fr.)-... t.•
A').;'.. . ;-..i:Iff-,•.'p.--0,-,-•-: : rmiseit44 4160.4.010•40:
t7:,i%:4•:;i1;'''1-•-zt :-.N..- PARKING PLAN-SLOGS la 2 *3 .?...' :°''''''41*" =:...5*
sovnam.. . CAN z'
i, . Ci.r1.!?•.:41-::: .. W04.
14, .s..ory 6/,t4/fl000 .• . .4 - - .
cssoi seo . tO . -.-.7 •:.-:----
4 GAM&pr.•PA: : -.•: •
L o•iit irieto.. ..r..go .-.; .......:.,.;T.--,-..
70,69/Ala conf4Ny rrocero • :"
4.-.‘-'.,-..1' g...f t• ..,',:.',--'...,•.v?.-'•
of 4-e4.,_ "A,z1t.:-;,.........24.-.--1.`...,i,.;..7.4-.)...::4.',,,11'.5.0.t:614,,,;-W.Kage-4...4.:,.....1-44.-, - .•':.4:..4' :L. -".=i.:-:'
tr''`3+;xj>i"i!;='.,lr 1;i=::',6i;j r i C irt!'Y rL+ 1 y S%1i x'!1"•T'tj' *yi'`f",`7^':n
J!"F f4tl'- k t
t,'}ti dµ`t,iSY 'dA' u';5n,$tayz. d';;^ +r@Oi,%.+ •wtwal':1, },,lE ' a4 F +'" f` i `"`6h9 `!'a. Cti ,t tt 3g a y . a
aF'. 9 " iri 6 7' ;'r iy'a dad IAiS`"jFi 3d'*VtEi! L+?'."{k' ." # 5.
Relocatable Offices s ^ 4 4, r k r Iz t w
4 y7« as V! r#^r 15-t: ` d`v aN l r1"1 ,4-
dkrff Ip t4 6S r, t Complete Canl
and Living quarters tr; = , tFS,rts'N.1.,, ort, 1444 Facilities ' .z as
Relocatable offices and N>
4"'= v, ,; 4 vv air* Domestic or international,
living quarters offer a P': 44 I f S }!i, . - tf'` ` , .,,=r, a„fit` t any size for any purpose.
wide variety of
n
1., ,
Y 5 W.
7. "* j 3. fir mess halls, dormitories,
comfortable working Xli..,,,I*03,4c;` " i t" n„ a, r • • f , laundries, family livingandhousingspace. 1 t r " 1.
u . -- '6„4;y // ;`' .'''' quarters, recreation halls.
Advanta es of unlimited 1 t' i 2 ' _
g n 3 -
f« w , J y+;±; , ^
f , ",-.
3"' zi reStPOOmS, commissaries.
size are easilyattained a r offices, or whatever
byassemblingseveral ,sty
lltr.,,,,,,,i,„„,,;. ty a `•"
a, r / y y
t! r y ) building your project
units to ether. r f."jr9fide . • ., ,O§.,a r",:. t Thio,,;;` ' t'r , 's ',,m k ,`..
requires.
f 'u
Yt. t4L
4t
a
r1 Al;
YYY`'
a# 1 £,'V. f_..4«ri A' }.g',ieta ,Set'i '.i' ' t,'
t ! x k,4'r Agra, $'s8`°';'A•
4'''''
F1
sp,t#u''!',r ai;`•{j';!
Storage Buildings limpl i , ; 1 G tt.n G;,;-.,, 1" ;t
rnComesinanysizefromii''a f}}G,,s1 ,,Ar,y,is.,;.,rl't,
t;k;"
tr,al"ii:', 1,,:T",1':,,,i;if t:.t: t; ,,,r ,
i
3' x 6' to over 120' x ' "4 r ,
r
a s i a
s i
k ,
a 11C1 ,I I ' (11 .. ',I
I
Metal Buildings
warehouse proportions"k`1 c P,,a
a w•
w« 1 i Ill 1( PI! (Factories, plants.
Easily assembled and a ' , .5'4 ' - '
x
M i
i'
r i`,"` `{' 'a' et i 1'
11 }workshops, warehouses.
disassembled into 3' x 7' it t ... a yi i! a„ '
a igj1? t,,, v "
F 9 I lEl t awl
standard wooden panels +' "" fi ya 1 t ;l..ft tx'}` 'aa M 8 a -_ 2, storage and distribution
P t, 1',1¢s,, kA was .: ">f , x ia`i i M facilities for anyforquicktransportatione
n'
1 lit-u;1°, *:4,, 1,'
F}+ 1Y;,• 1
h,
r• ,.'
r i< , • ,, °, , s 't,a manufacturing operation
anywhere. Economical ` 4, r rlii;'7 y,11.7 ta',ai; t' 'ra i'gw r 4,,,F i,
p
yygg , ,,;':.iv.,.
a., r.
il'' s &&
t* r„,0 4
R>t $ err t' C ? i'
Widths to 200'.Heights lc
and versatile. fir "' „`r-,fia t., v9i2`it% w 'wc -A,..p } ' q n s• x+' -'S, ? n' d .0 24'. Lengths t0 any size.
w C_..`t pJ.b`ia .vf+u...s n' i6CL..wNS1 1'1 yW+''•yr.., "W't - ..!%.+N";•' 1
1 ,ids V'"S ft{;.a;,tte,k`5 4,5 i"
4,.
041r
i,,
0,Z' t!'01,d ta.
Modular Buildings t
F tax h?
P
5
J'1 11111 !i 1ri3+
and Classrooms r
c, +. 0'
d 11•
F rd!.
et'1 1,
1 tt t i `i Ft Buildings11,lI , s w,
Permanent or i i;
1 +1 3 1'=.1;",o, ,,y.
d i 1`1
g
S a s+ * /'"[ ,or
r 1 s, ,,, ,.0 I 5 ta• Choose from convention
relocatable. Economical r •', (` ' li y'' ,1 lit % r,:t I `1jk „
pa ,. 1., ,gi itil i,I4if. , lt, ;. fl or low water use system
modular buildings are ' y I I 1 `"" 9 ct r- _ it h, ll,a ,,lti. 9 1I r H iltR§ Yidealforhighquality,
a s PP i tft` ' t'1t,1ii' ('6 iap{h a
Low water use stems
g a ,it ..'^ l.t .1154 t'` ,lio c 1,; d.' ti+ 1 require no sewer and
durable structures that j4 1 I '.I 1 ' "1" q
13' '"'`,'11'1 1' t i E iat •a,il14 r t h septic connections and
nay need to be moved at 44„ 4„ t ;4 t1 ° '" a 14ycm.,P . result in 93% less
some future date. Meets 1,0 +'*
c
alp'* '''; „ fa•w3t am sewage disposal. Ideal
all city, county and state~ V', G,•
a"t'c' !
c
p""tl} '
0 .,. for outdoor or in-plant
S.
lt,,`` ".
W.A f7 L1"' 4 :S1i 6-iAsTrk `1.
4..11"{`
6' ",$ far ,.Code
4 i I d . t ak-*z 1.tAt , US®.
E''IL ram`.'. '
5 . . t 0,d"t
1 `..'wR ' «;
4' 'GS h{i
l t',/+ ,{;l Y'.
pPv1 a 6 .^ qy,C 'g i g pn31d 't,,A,9y,,,, ) ) yt a
p p' II itc41` ,i 414 4p4,r! • tk.
a•. lining t g,,to it0:,1 , y 1. t„,,x .i
x 1.1"fd • + v t,, ,, at f
t1
1
a Y..' 4 ',tr "I„ '--.,,0 kzr.t av
TT''N
i$"! "
y', 9'' Y 4r iYi a
y, ,1''' a
S i ;
st+ j'a g In-Plant Offices and
Arc N t 7.
f ,.fi fl4ta 4'1;
W ,e Guard Shacksi; o . -c ";5 ,
4t
1 t/ Custom built to an
Electronic Equipment tor*,
I
1' Al
z°
c
t !€ 1#04 W Ikkg*lIf
R
specs,this low cost office
poi,
j' V, t t• I '. a can be for{clitted orShelters . , 1'
tberglass shelters for the c "40•, ; F 5`6 Tali 4 moved by crane
protective housing of 4
Ax+ 3' + : anywhere. inside orP94dtP..1,1 ,.
sensitive electronic and n i ! j y
t (s<t+ 7ba,' 1 144 outside. Provides an
i•ai a , +y4. t4 '
d'Y"'' °YN ? , .
k' y rM At, ,....3 (As41.0! t ,, instant in-plant office.communications d" s I u
equipment. ' r. y
1 taf,q :{, r .r7#',,. x= i{'`'3t ..
k
guard shack, sales office
v ` a m • I i; 'f^,P 4 $w' it i,,. t or shop.
loc • ila le trc` :ctbur-.
7"here. cod/,be e..v/rJdoce's
for every pur .. ,:psen
Porta House pioneered the relocatable
s a 7` fr r lie`
structure industry in 1946 and remains the .... .----"--_
leader today. Our field offices, camps and :Al)-
housing units are located around the world ,;•,1, - aj
in every climate. t
Whatever your housing requirements, Porta . '
House supplies portable and modular USE f C.
buildings for all purposes. Our structures for , '?
Lr 21716 EAST VALLEY Ham.
31
office and storage uses include in-plant J' KENT i m n noffices, classroom buildings, field offices,Ac;
warehouses, business offices, restroom .... "" t.
facilities, fiberglass shelters for electronic ,? ,. f S
equipment, laboratories, banks and V I rl G.)-- ' 717 Kevin Court, P.O. Box 2226
complete camps. A .°*-' Oakland, CA 94621
415) 638-0100/ TELEX 330403
ti,;'.
F'
Ay1.
r , 4'fUg'o Plannin
12-1979
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT. APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Applicat tr..„......., •ion s vori go et A;°
peva) .:•
or On* 0 •;II- :4, 4Pie iirio • atom A eelVerti ,tsv v 0,' ___W_evis113 .
Location: *goo a W C .R ad i •
Applicant:. '
TO: 1 Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : , :, .,'`
Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE: 4,"'
I ,'; ,i •
Public W rks Department
Engineering Division
Traffic Engineering f`.`
Building Division Vi ,,C,'r' , (,\
Utilities Engineering r..., 1
Fire Department rs., J1
Other) : A.
I
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED INWRGFOkTHEAPPLICATIONREVEWCONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
AT 9:uO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.
IF OU ',EPARTMENT/DIVISION RE SPRE ENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T AIzTEND THE ARC,P P i IDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :OU P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :2^
c/
4..,we.......6......
Approved Approved with Conditions ____ Not Approved
i);',46,,q— 41.c„___
Signature of Director or Authorized epresentative Date
REVIEWING ;DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : L-L-,
i,
Y.. Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
is i,_. -1-1—:.„, e.,"-C e -c
10 1t fD l
c,•.,., ,.....„...,, ,,\. „,
r
12 ‘._,,,._.. _co—._ r/Vsc_-_,DateSignatureofDirectororAuthorizedRepresentative
lift! 0 P.l an-.ni n(
12.1D7g`
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: / ., own,. So t
r
rit- r * iii'0 e to wiradefesr. ;el) i ' v. ,..i, ft, 'IA, e IL tilfi ' -, . . '; 69Mte a
Location: sob W qRodSi
Applicant:
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 72 ,:,,.. " *
Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE: - '
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
Traffic Engineering
4
Buil ing Division
tilities Engineering
s
Fire Department
Other) : _
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS. APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED INWRGFORTHEAPPLICATIONRV1EWCONFERENCE' ARC) TO BE HELD ON
AT :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.IF OU "DEPARTMENT/D V SII ION REPRESENTATIVE WILL°° NOT ABLE T ATTEND THE ARC,P PFvVIDE THE COMMENTS TO 'THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON
IT
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
ieer
Af Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
Li" GeTr
Signature of Director or Authorized Representat
d O
ve Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :plug oce i
X Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
1
4?// /
001L---- lb
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
go Plannin
12-1979
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION) REVIEW SHEET
Application: p • i S' i ,,. Rey
plor oft, . 4,24". .4e3toriti .111t vie xerpte n
Location: ee5c)W ciRogi
Applicant:
TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : - -. - . .
Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE: 9/0/7 0
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
Traffic Engineering
Building Division y..t• ' ,V> >;.
Utilities Engineering 1 70
Fire Department t ''
Other) :
Vi'•
CONMENTS 'OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WR T G FOR THE APPLICATION R V EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON
AT :UO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM.
IF OUI DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENT VATI E WILL NOT ABLE T AITEND THE ARC,
fP VP IDE THE COMMENTS TO. THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :UU P.M, ON
REVIEWING' DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:A:96,
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
SignA'ture; of Director or Author zed Representative Date
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: .f . ,Z
f't..Approved Approved with Conditions Not ApprovedPP
f //a/(7
Si§natureof Director or Authorized Representative Date
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No: SA-207-80
Environmental Checklist No: ECF-553-80
Description of Proposal: Site Approval for installation of 10' x 32'
trailer for use as a dispatch office.
Proponent: BOEING COMPANY
Location of Proposal: 800 S.W. 43rd Street
Lead Agency: City of Renton
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on April 2, 1980 following a
presentation by David R. Clemens and Steve Munson of the Planning
Department. Oral comments were accepted from:
NONE
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC
on application ECF-553-80 are the following:
1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by:
GENE WILLIAMS, Assistant Planner, dated April 1, 1980
2) Applications: BOEING COMPANY,, SITE APPROVAL SA-027-80
3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-signficance:
None, project exempt WAC-197-10-170-(1) (C) ,' commercial
building less than 4,000 square feet in area.
SIGNATURES:
rtctcavr-sa. _
John E. Webley, Director or on r c sen, P ann ng
Parks & Recreation Department Direct
eV)/
Warren G. Gonnason. Director
Public Works Department
a
e Paid Advertisement)
I
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IDETERMINATION
e ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW- .
COMMITTEE
RENTON,WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERE)has Issued a final declaration of non-significant*for the following prolect:
t. RENTON AVIATION (ECF•35780), AP-PLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL IN
i P-1 ZONE TO EXPAND EXISTING FA-CILITY FOR SERVICE AND MAINTE•NANCE OF AIRCRAFT, File SA-03840;1 property located at 840 W. Perimeter
n Road,northwest corner of Renton Muni-clpal Airport.
Further information regarding this action IsavailableInthePlanningDepartment,MuniCCoal
ia. Building. Renton, Washington, 23S-2550. Any oaetolofERCactionmustbefliedwiththeHear.Ing Examiner by April 30,1980.Published:April 16,1980
NOTICEOF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON,WASHINGTON
A PubIlC hearing will be held by the Renton Land ' ,
I. Use Hearin Examiner at his regular meeting IntheCouncilChambers,City Hell,Renton,Wash-
ington,on April 29.1980,et 9:00 A.M.to considerthefollowingpetitions:
1.Kohl excavating Mehl-Christianson Adds. fNon),on), applications for preliminary Plat
t.OPoroval for 7-1ot single family detached l
development,File PP•008-80,and exception
to subdivision ordinance regarding Pipes-tern lots,Flle E•033-80;property located at
W.3rd Place.2.Schneider Constru1314.and S•
Cemponyp Hilltop), loppitcetionsforpreliminaryPlotapproval
for 20-lot single family detached develop-y mint and Tract 1(later to be developed asmulti-family), Fite PP-023-80. and excep- FtiontosubdivisionordinanceregardingPi- )Postern,lots, Pile E43140;property locat- iedsouthofN.E.6th St.and east of Monroe
f
Ave.N.E.
3.The Boeing Company,application for site iapprovalforinstallationof10'x32'(racier for tt
use as dispatch office In M-P Zone,File SA-
t
t
027.80;prowirty located on sit*of Building2.Benorove Business Pork,SO0 S.W.43rd.
4. Renton Elks Club, aaptltation for rezonefromGS-1 to R-3 to construct Dentol clinicFileR-026.80; property located between 'Renton Elks Club and Benson Rood. t, .
S.Renton Elks Club, optfilcotlon for two-lot
Short Plot approval (Hanchereff_Short
Plot),FIle 029-so;property located betweenRentonElksClubandBensonRood. t6.City of Renton, applications for two-lot !•I,; Short Plat approval,File 040.80,and excep-lion to subdivision ordinance regarding lot
l, width, File E-04t-80; property located In
1. the public use area In Block 46 of the Car-
it . rected Plot of the Renton Highland No.2.
I. which is bounded by Harrington Pt. N.E.,Harri'- '
Legal descriptions of filesendooted above aE.12th re onfileIntheRentonPlanningDepartment.ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETI- iTIONSAREINVITEDTOBEPRESENTAT,
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON April 29, 1960,of9:00A.M.TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS,
GORDON Y.ERICKSEN,
Renton Planning Director
Published;April 16,1980 I f
a .
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON , WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING
EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
CITY HALL , RENTON, WASHINGTON , ON APRIL 29 , 1980, AT 9 :00
A .M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS :
1 . KOHL EXCAVATING (KOHL-CHRISTIANSON ADDITION) ,
APPLICATIONS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR
7-LOT SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DEVELOPMENT , File
PP-008-80 , AND EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS, File E-033-80 ; property
located at S .W. Sunset Blvd. and S .W. 3rd Place .
2 . SCHNEIDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (HILLTOP) ,
APPLICATIONS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR 20-LOT
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DEVELOPMENT AND TRACT 1 (LATER
TO BE DEVELOPED AS MULTI-FAMILY) , File PP-023-80 ,
AND EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING
PIPESTEM LOTS , File E-031-80 ; property located
south of N .E. 6th St . and east of Monroe Ave . N .E .
3 . THE BOEING COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL
FOR INSTALLATION OF 10 ' X 32 ' TRAILER FOR USE AS
DISPATCH OFFICE IN M-P ZONE , File SA-027-80 ;
property located on site of Building 2 , Benaroya
Business Park , 800 S.W. 43rd .
4. RENTON ELKS CLUB , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM
GS-1 TO R-3 TO CONSTRUCT DENTAL CLINIC, File
R-028-80 ; property located between Renton Elks
Club and Benson Road .
S . RENTON ELKS CLUB , APPLICATION FOR TWO-LOT SHORT
PLAT APPROVAL (HANCHEROFF SHORT PLAT ) , File
029-80 ; property located between Renton Elks
Club and Benson Road .
6 . CITY OF RENTON, APPLICATIONS FOR TWO-LOT SHORT
PLAT APPROVAL , File 040-80 , AND EXCEPTION TO
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING LOT WIDTH, File
E-041-80 ; property located in the public use area
in Block 46 of the Corrected Plat of the Renton
Highland No . 2 , which is bounded by Harrington
P1 . N .E . , Harrington Ave. N. E . and N . E . 12th St .
Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the
Renton Planning Department .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE
PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 29 , 1980 , AT 9 :00
A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS .
PUBLISHED : April 16 , 1980 GORDON Y . ERICKSEN,
RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
I , GENE WILLIAMS , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE
ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to
before me , a Notary Public , in
and for the State of Washington
residing in King County , on the
15th day of April . y
si Z •_
3IGNED: `
r 44
OF RR
Jt o THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
n BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
9 co' 235- 2550
P
o947.
SEP1
t,0
April 11 , 1980
The Boeing Company
P . 0 . Box 3999 M/S 14-41
Seattle , Washington 98124
Re : APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR INSTALLATION OF
10 ' x 32 ' trailer for use as dispatch office in M-P
zone , File SA-027-80 ; property located on site of
Building 2 , Benaroya Business Pzrk , 800 S.W. 43rd
Gentlemen :
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on April 1 , 1980. A public hearing
before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for
April 29 , 1980, at 9 :00 a.m.
Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present.
All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing .
If you have any further questions , please call the Renton
Planning Department , 235-2550 .
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y. Ericksen ,
Planning Director
By : L.l e.:-f. ,r/:-
Roge,r J . Blaylock/
Associate Planner
RJB :wr
cc : Jack A. Benaroya Company
Attn : Joel Benoliel , Secretary
5950 6th Ave . S.
Seattle , WA 98108
NOTICE
THIS PROPERTY
GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS:
PROPERTY LOCATED ON SITE OF BUILDING 2 , BENAROYA PARK ,
800 S .W. 43RD.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF
A PUBLIC HEARING
TO BE HELD
IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING
ON APRIL 29 , 1980 BEGINNING AT 9 :00 A.M. .M.
CONCERNING ITEM CJ1
U REZONE
SPECIAL PERMIT
firSITE APPROVAL INSTALRAFOR ISPANDOOTCHxOFFICE
IN M-P ZONE .
WAIVER
I SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT
U
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No: SA-207-80
Environmental Checklist No : ECF-553-80
Description of Proposal : Site Approval for installation of 10' x 32 '
trailer for use as a dispatch office.
Proponent: BOEING COMPANY
Location of Proposal : 800 S,W. 43rd Street
Lead Agency: City of Renton
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on April 2, 1980 following a
presentation by David R. Clemens and Steve Munson of the Planning
Department. Oral comments were accepted from:
NONE
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC
on application ECF-553-80 are the following:
1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by:
GENE WILLIAMS , Assistant Planner, dated April 1 , 1980
2) Applications : BOEING COMPANY, SITE APPROVAL SA-027-80
3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-signficance:
None, project exempt WAC-197-10-170- (1) (C) , commercial
building less than 4, 000 square feet in area.
SIGNATURES :
44/)/,;;.<<44.
John E. Weble Director4 ://4. /,
cordon tricksen, Planning
Parks & Recreation Department Directpr
Warren G. Gonnason, Director
Public Works Department
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
APRIL 2 , 1980
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 10: 00 A. M. :
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
1 . NEW BUSINESS:
ECF-541-80 KOHL EXCAVATING
PP-008-80 KOHL-CHRISTIANSON ADDITION
Application for preliminary
plat approval for seven-lot
single family detached
development ; S . W. Sunset
Blvd and S. W. 3rd Place .
ECF-550-80 SCHNEIDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PP-023-80 HILLTOP
Application for preliminary
plat approval for twenty-lot
single family detached develop-
ment and Tract 1 ( later to be
developed as multi -family) ;
south of N . E . 6th St. and east
of Monroe Ave. N . E .
ECF-553-80 THE BOEING COMPANY
SA-027 -80 Application for site approval
for installation of 10 ' x 32 '
trailer for use as dispatch
office on site of Building 2 ,
Benareya Business Park ;
800 S . W. 43rd .
ECF-554-80 RENTON ELKS CLUB
R-028-80 Application for rezone from GS-1
and B-1 to B-1 and R-2 to construct
dental clinic ; property located
between Renton Elks and Benson Road .
2 . OLD BUSINESS :
FURTHER DISCUSSION : ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
a
Date circulated : Comments due :
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - J t
APPLICATION No (s ) . S — 02.7 70
PROPONENT : j Soei wei CoulrAviliy
PROJECT TITLE : Sp„.t 94'ee..e..-
Brief Description of Project : ip,iufct'locf A ct_ MY x32.'
vc0.-c -avr t&se, as d;sp e4. 1ice , ovt .st: at 13tkildika 2 --rematroy a
LOCATION : 860 5tt3 43rof
SITE AREA : 00s , 4 a
BUILDING AREA (gross)329 rg, .
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE
a(%)
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : C
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X
3) Water & water courses : X
4) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7) Light & glare : le i
8 ) Land Use ; north : P0.rkdkg o e EL.) 4frf S1'
east : - e...i„...civ07 ?it_
south : 'Payskim.le it i ekf
Id Iwest : tss c,,
a.
Land use conflicts : / 1
C/
View obstruction : Wawa,
9) Natural resources : K
10) Risk of upset : X .
11 ) Population/Employment : x I
I12 ) Number of Dwellings :X j
13) Trip ends (ITE) : Alb yAe
traffic impacts : e Q.,
s
14 ) Public services : C
15 ) Energy : X 1
16) Utilities : X
1
17) Human health : I X I
18) Aesthetics : j K 1
19 ) Recreation :
I
Xi
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
1
Recommendation : DNSI X DOS More Information
Reviewed by : 444%./44 , /.4.4lli Title : 4sr!Cr iL1 - p/cipniek-
Date : 69O
CITY OF RENTON
APPLICATION
SITE APPROVAL R w
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
4 AI
File No . SA- ' ? 7_f o Filing Date j '
Application Fee $ /0,51 v-6 Receipt No .
Environmental Review Fee $
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :
1. Name THE BOEING COMPANY Phone 655-8229
Address P.O.Box 3999 M/S 14-41,, Seattle, Washington 98124
2 . Property location ' 800 SW 43rd J '%J e_i 57,L
Renton, Washington 98055
3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary)
See AttachedaSheet .
NOTE: Reference Approved Site Plans: SA-150-78 for Buildings _1, 2, 3
SA-216-78 for Buildings 4, 5. 6. 7
4 . Number of acres or square feet 500 Sq. Ft. Present zoning M-P
5. What do you propose to develop on this property? It is proposed to locate a
10' x 32' trailer at the northwest corner of Building 2 of the Renton Benar ya RusinPss
Park. Trailer will be blocked up, tied down, sprinklered and skirted per code. Trailer
will be used as a maintenance and dispatch office for the Benaroya Complex.
6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application :
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale
existing structures , easements , and other
factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20'
B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 '
C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning
on adjacent parcels)1" = 200 ' to 800 '
D. Building height and area (existing and proposed)
7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION :
Date Approved
Date Denied
Date Appealed
Appeal Action
Remarks
Planning Dept .
Rev, 1-77 '
1
LEGAL. DESCRIPTION
An area containing 500 Sq. Ft. at the Northwest 'corner of Building 2
Benaroya Business Park, Renton described as follows:
That portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast
quarter of Section 36, Township 23 North, Range 4 East,
W. M. and of Government Lot 1 , Section 31 , Township 23
North, Range 5 East, W. M. in the City of Renton, King
County, Washington described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest corner of said northeast
quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 36;
Thence S 01°47'51" W along the west line thereof a
distance of 1278.87 feet to a line 48 feet northerly of
the proposed centerline of S. W. 43rd Street, said
proposed centerline begins at the intersection of the
East Valley Highway with the south line of the northeast
quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 31 , Township
23 North, Range 5 East, W. M. and runs thence westerly,
in a straight line, to the intersection of the centerline
of the West Valley Highway with the south line of
Government Lot 2 of Section 36, Township 23 North; Range
4 East, W. M.;
Thence S 88°36'37" E along said parallel line a distance
of 815.75 feet to the true point of beginning;
Thence continuing S 88°36'37" E along said parallel line
675.81 feet;
Thence N 01°23'23" E a distance of 905.92 feet;
Thence N 88°36'37" W a distance of 675.81 feet;
Thence S O1°23'23" W a distance of 905.92 feet to the
true point of beginning.
TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO an easement for ingress and
egress over, across and upon a strip of land 90 feet in
width, having 45 feet of said width on each side of the
east line and the west line of the above described tract.
Containing 612,230 square feet or 14.054 acres.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY '
Application No. 5-/? —Oa? 7-,FO -
Environmental Checklist No. A-VP -4-iC)
PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date:
Declaration of Significance El Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS:
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act -of 1971,, Chapter 43:21C, 'RCW, requires `
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their ,;
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The -Act also requires that .an EIS be " .
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to help the' agencies involved determine-whether or not 'a .,
proposal is such a' major action.
Please answer the following questions as-.completely .as .you .can with "the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or 'where ', . I '
you believe an explanation would be helpful - to government decision makers , include your 1
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if. necessary: You should
include references to any reports or studies of which .you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all"
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total, proposal , not just to the license' for which
you are currently applying or the proposal •for which approval is ,sought.' Your answers
should include the impacts which''will be caused by your proposal when it. is completed, r
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the. future: This will allow all
of the agencies which will ' be involved to complete their environmental . 'revi,ew now, with- j "
out duplicating paperwork in the future. • '
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies ,in the State -
of Washington for various types of proposals .' Many of-the, questions may not, apply to j , .
your proposal . If a question does, not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM,
i , ,..
I . BACKGROUND 1 -' ;
1-. - Name -of- Proponent THE BOEING COMPANY
2. Address and phone number of 'Proponent:
P.O.Box 3999
Seattle, WA 98124 , Phone': 655=3641
For additional information contact Roy Olson on 655-8229
3-. - -Date Checklist submitted ' 'March 20, 1980
4. Agency requiring Checklist Renton Planning Department
5. Name of proposal ,, if applicable:
Dispatch Office
6. ' Nature and brief description of the proposal (including .but 'not limited to its ; .
size, general design elements , and other, factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
Proposal is to install. a 10' x 32'. trailer o 'be used as"'"a'"dt ispatch" office
and office for maintehance 'supervisor: 'Trailer`will . provide better visibility-..
of area to direct incoming trucks' and routing of, our own, forkl i'fts' and
vehicles. -
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical set'tingof the proposal , a`s>` well
as the extent of the: land area affected by any ,environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the env i.ron:,,
mental setting of the proposal ) :
Trailer will be 'located on the west side of the :northwest corner'. of Building; 2
of the Renton Benaroya Business Park..
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal: . ' '
Two (2) weeks after site approval . `
9. List of al 1 permits , 1 i censes orp government approval s required 'for the proposal"::;.;, °• ,.
federal , state and local--including rezones) :
City of Renton Building Permit
City of Renton'E'lectrical Permit
10. Do you have any plans for future additions', expansion, or further activity ,
related to or connected with this proposal ? •,If,.yes , explain:
NO
11. Do you know- of 'any plans by others which ma 'affect thee.property-
your proposal ? If yes ,. explain :
NO
12. Attach any other application form that has been: completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed ,at „some` future' -': ;
date, describe the nature of such application form; ` ,
NONE
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" .answers }are: required)
1) Earth Will the proposal result in
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changesrini:'geologic Y ;<;..
substructures? X.:
YE'-S .MAYBE.
b) Disruptions, displacements,;compaction or over 4,
X =covering of the soil?
YES MAYBE NO .
c) Change in topography or ground surtface relief
features?
d) The destruction, :covering or modification of.any
unique geologic or physical features? X ' r'.'.
T ;.,,MAYBE NO,
e) Any increase in wind or water; erosion of.,s;oils ,` ; Z.,
either on or off the' site?
YES.:. ,;MAYBE' NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach.,sands ,~ or-
changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which
may modify the' channel .of a river or.. stream •or the
bed of the ocean or any bay,': ,inlet or lake?'.X•
YES '• MMGYBE: ;NO'
Explanation
2) Air. Will the proposal result in. j
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient ,air
quality? r ESR _MBE NO
b) The creation of _objectionable odors?
YES MAYBE NO ;
c) Alteration of air movement, -moisture or temperature,'; ' .,•.. •_. :.'.,:'
or any change in climate, either locally or
regionally?:X°
YES MAYBE. NO
Explanation.
3) Water. Will the proposal, result in i ,
a) ' Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements , in,either marine or fresh .waters? • "
YES `MAYBE NO
b) Changes- in absorption 'rates , drainage patterns, or ••a' j '' ::-•.;"
the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
YES
c) Alterations to the course or flow of;flood waters? X
YES • MAYBE NO •
d) Change in the amount' of surface water in• any water
body? X
YES MAYBE . NO,-
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any `alteration"" `
surface water quality, including but not limited 'to r
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
YES MAYBE NO-;
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?YES MAYBENO
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either . , : i
through direct additions or withdrawals , or. through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
YES MAYBE , NO,
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either` thirough
direct injection , or through..the. seepage of leachate,
phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or. bacteria, 1
or other substances into the ground waters? i . '
YES MAYBE NO.
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available:'
X
for public water supplies?YES MAYBE., NO- ,
Explanation.
j {
4) , Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) _Change in the diversity of species , or numbers', of .any :•
species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass ,. crops , . ,,,
X
microflora and aquatic plants)' • YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?YES FrATIfP. rf67
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an 'area, or".,.. •
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing' '': X
species? .YES MAYS i10
d). Reduction in acreage, of any agricultural"; crop? "
X
YES-,;: M YBE, NO
Explanation:
1. t
5) FaUna. Will the proposal result in j
a) Changes in the diversity:, of species or numbers' of ,. :
any species of.:fauna (birds , land animals ;including ;: µd
reptiles , fish and shellfish, 'benthic organisms , .
insects or microfauna)?r ,
YES 1-,-;MAYBE'',
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare oror.,"
endangered: specie of fauna? X
1, • YES ' MAYBE—. N9
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into'.an 'area , .
or result in a barrier to the' migration orimovement .
of fauna?
YES';:: .MAYBE • NO
d) Deterioration to existing 'fish. ,or:"wildl'ife .habitat?YES '1MAYBE NO vv
Explanation. ,
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? •AYBE , NO
Explanation.
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
X ..^v •,
glare?Y_Ems.: ,MAYBE : N0"
Explanation:
8) Land Use. Will the proposal ,'result in the, alteration of' the X .. .:, ''j;: •. ,
present or planned land use of an area? , -,YES MAYBE .
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in
a) Increase in the rate of use of, any natural' res:our.-Ces?
YES' MAY BE ;NO,, ' • :
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE.• 'N'O
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset: Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including; ;
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or,:radiation`)::,` : :.' •. ','
in the event of an accident or upset conditions?TES ,' `MAYBE:) NO
Explanation
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area?
r
Yam`' `M BE N
Explanation. : '
5-
12) housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? s, X I -
YES •MAYBE NO,
Explanation:
13) Transportation/Circulation.. Will the proposal result, i;n:
a) Generation of ;additiona,l -vehicular,movement?.X '
YES.: '''`MAYBE NO '
r..
b) Effects: on existing parking facilities , or demand
for new parking? X
YES MAYBE NO, is
c) Impact upon existing, transportat•ion°-systems? tirX I f•
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or '
movement of people and/or goods? X
YES MAYBE NO
e) 'Alterations to waterborne, .rail",or.air, 'traffi,c? X. ;I.7
YES MAYBE.".-2 NO: - .i' ,
f) Increase in traffic -hazards_ to motor vehicles, : . :X
bicyclists or pedestrians?`
ES;, ;MA B NO I`
Proposal shoul-d resul t i n handling "t'raffi'c''',better 'in the; jExplanation: p
vicinity of the -Benaroya Business,.Park:—Parking' sta11 scwi 17
be'added-north of 'Bail di ng`, 3 to replace° those::.deleted •by.'.
1 ocati on of trailer,' . . . c'
14) Public Services. Will the' proposal .;have an effect upon;, 'or .`.` •
result in a need for new or :altered governmental services
in any of the following areas . 2,
a) Fire protection? -• s
X'
YES" MAY-BE- _NO; I . "';; -
b) Police :protection?
YES MAYBE I NO.. .
c) Schools?
X.
YES' MAYBE NO
Parks or other ,recreational facilities? X `
YES' MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?X'
YES MAYBE ;.:N9. .
f) Other governmental services?
YES MAYBE; NO
Explanation.
15) , Energy.. Will the proposal result in
a) _Use .of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X 1t'`
ES ;MAYBE': :NO .
requires. orofenergy,sourcesInb) Demand upon extstt g X, ,
the development .:of new sources of energy? IYESE•MAYB . NO
Explanation:
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems , or alterations to the following utilities :e: ':,. : •'
a) Power or natural gas?
YES MAYBE !.: NO
I (b) Communications systems? .
YES MAYBE NO
c) Water?
YES .', _MAYBE.,•`NO,
Fy
y,Lei'I 'd Sewer or-'`se tic tanks., , . i
Yam•
e) Storm water drainage? X
FiriTfe
f) Solid waste and disposal?`
YES MAYBE N0'' " •
Explanation:
t
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in •the rll.reati on...of
any health hazard or potential health' hazard (e) cluding°,
mental health)? . X
Explanation:
S MAYB . ,r 6":
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any;any; scenic vista' or view open to ' the public, ..
obstruction
will" the
proposal result in the:creation of an aesthetically offensive :,;
site open to public view? X
Explanation
19) , Recreation. Will the proposal result in an iympact: upon "the; `.
quality_or' quantity' of existing recreational oppor,tunitti,es? f
Y:E.S M A1 BE . TO
Explanation: "
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the ''proposal''-result. in an> r:
alteration of a significant archeological or historical. '"' : :. i
site, structure, object. or, building? i '
I rf; TES: MAYBE 4rr;
Explanation.
III. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of-my knowledge the-`above;`.information.-:'` 'F
is true and complete: It is understood that-the lead agency 'may with-dr.aw.:.any decl.a-' ,:.:•, -:
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance' upon_ this checklist'' shoul;d,:;:,;;`.
there' be any willful misrepresentation or.wi 11:f ul ..lack `of' ful-1 di ' 1 os.ure on.'iny: part.
Proponent
s.i g .d
V. E. 'Norton' .Manaer: , .. j
f`
c
Lnarqe. priAted)Fac1Iities Engineer'ing.`
1 `.. City of,,Ren'ton .
f'; ;Planning Department•;:' : :"`T:J *'
P `5-76 r r
AFFIDAVIT
1, „TMa: - BEN6/ea Y,,q eONPAWV being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me
this 6 day of M(e_ G/\ 19.60 ,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at ,(4217,c,
e/4- 66 J/ekee V/ e e4/0 y
ame of Notary r ature of Owner)
r
Crk. 77/7 76/ag 6--9bn Ate - .
Address) / ZAddress)
City) Mate)
7zTV7 5 )
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of such application .
Date Received 19 By:
Renton Planning Dept .
2-73
OF . ,.- ILE
FILE TITLE
t
a,'
i
t '.^
F nit"•'
I {`
y !
a '`4
11 c. .ate t
f
8 0 .
V1