No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA80-103BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED SAI . . , 103 - 80 s. ..:'.• •. ....)-.., -• ;• ' :' ' •••• :, -- - ..,. - - '- ,.•' , . •- ., -,• ",. ••'•-•-1 •,..„ ' '::: . ,,;_- . - : ,- ••'• •', -,:....1.', . ... ..' .; •!•-,:- . .-_, : .„, ' •". .,: ---' :', o-.4 ip'..9:t4,6_6•01) 1,--' -': •. .,;..-.:: ,:•-;•-.1.:22-:.!.-,.4„-- „ 4„!12_7_,::_-.1,_:-.....,,....._;.,,...,..,.. .:•;‘,...„,.. '.. f, .• -..... i -': • •-•; : . '' ' '-''' ...; ' ' -.- r-';- s '•" .', . • • ' '' : -- .-, -•-•- .-. ' ::::-'-'?.:-:::::--",:'....'.' ' :,.:... ' 4..: ..-;:—.-... .',••.-'.-• -,..'‘ .t , ':,,-.. .----- 1! , .' - . h.•',t,. ,',..:,' .-•,.: ', • : L.- • 7 ,.;••••?1 , f - *-1' . . •:. .-: ',...-. ; -''.. ' '; -"' .- 7,-.-'• ' .r, ....:,:.', - ' . j..-'. - . .: : '. :' . '1- : , .,' / , • '.", -- .- ' ' . •''' ''4+ • ' -' ' !: - . . ..,..' 2., :'' ''. ' 12.. . - : -., '. ••,7,...,7.7"-•'-',,i1,,,•,.-:-;• ', .- . •,.---A;i:i:i•;s7,i•,7.7 ..77.•.;-1":•:•‘..•.:- ,: .:I 4,-•::,1•-•,--.,, ,12-•;':::....,•,.:-',."..•-•• 1**: : zr: . :,.:• • .' r....... ,.., . ,• .. . t: : . ' ''1'.. ' : ... . :-,.. '' . '..:iC,- .,.‘ , . v L:, • •;:',''' • ..:'ciP:: . • •1 - ' f:- -'. -:..; . 7.: : ii• ' ...._!-: . •-' - '... .. . .... . ..!-,. :•- NM Tiit141/,...4.411tVGkirlY pa Wilalky; , • a-:--- . ..• . • , f . .. , ,,,,,e ,-:,-..- . ,.-. .. . :rrizz--; ''' ' • -.&°!.tr-g*A1L, s•Artiu,,IT's.• 7..:•,]; . :•• , • i, 1 , : , . ',.. . ':. ei7GrAdoL ' .. .24'Wit•i. - ikal t; •: • +-Trm:44- we.,, 7.13:Lin: • Lt , •*-:-'• :. ••:-. -•- .- r-:• ----CITY .''' • ' ' -.• .• . —.--:. ..:Isj . excee.o.:4, ', 0/\‘‘‘'iv .- : . • ....'1'• t'''.'. : ' '',-'))-.' 1 ^ TA .•• : i, t : . -____..,_.----- ....____— :77:-. ' .. • --r! : t. ..: • -- : •,..,.:,:‘,.. i- ,_-.i.: :: ! , . , 0 . -,..---,,..; : :, . : • , . , 4;..; cl... . . s.. • •20','. - - .:„., • -.--15:er---20.., 7-7:- ,,- *,„--"':' -tE-V:'.7.''' '' '.1.$ .1: 1' ...' .. 'I.' : •'' ' :;•,.. .1' .'• ' . i.' : -'''' s •', •'. •. - :: ; RV-4' ....''.......:,'''...-•. li • .'-. ' •:i'Oili•i,gr Z.' :. "''. ' -': III::`' '''.'.. •::'. •• .: .:t qtA14— . • '7-;7' •itt"'•Li.l'.)Y., ' s :.: 1'f'• - If .--•V :,.,•,) .. ,.- : • "1-TE• '- PaLANO ' - -i• • •GI ..::: . \..••• • ..i.s,- .: :. 6, *.: . -.. . -• , : •N,,,..Q.. .._ : , ..,. .- ;• , -, -2: , , : 1,. -•1 '... .-- :. • ..' .., '• .: . ,'• . . ': ' .• ..• ' • 1. o'.--_.:-.... .43---7-7---;,.-: .. ',... -4:..-. '--::: •--: . ..'..-•:- ',: .. - ': . i , •••••••-•',.:'•••• -. . '.. . ... . s•'-- -! ri 7.71/... ii, - , , ivo.v .:. . — ..,• :-. ,.. ..., . ./. 14E14,•M`441,14 ,o.u..../ --... .• .• . • • •-•• ; • -:C....kitear-A“re.i.c4•1*.?-nea,-t,C440"c-UOTft Oa''''••- ' : ' :' ' :• •:--: '. .1 . ' '' ' - ' " ' . ‘11 -1°-:2•- . ' 5eLteiV'Skinttl -.,' 7 1;61, : .:, • • • 0{1411i4.'s,cue: 5 e6J2, ,„5L /MA12E'44.7.; r,:, ?l'.:1°'' : ". -• cjilIST:i15:4#1$ ilefactlikLIO;lb I'4,1 4102 014.1i- ' ', ' . •'• -:2' '•' •'' , i 1"..)- - pLA,1.1•f i 4. . - ,.. •: ' ..', °---- --,- •-. 4.:icaior, . , ....:, • , .1-2'---4,---- •• , •.- • -,•- ..:';';:•-. ._. ).• .'.. -.• ' '- ..••• - - - :• ',• - '• . I',., ., • . . I, Mfile 1192.iis;g4 Ait....%ce.-.' .. 1); 7'... .--::`': - ''. ..'• ..' Y*8" i 71.,l'irell —ma' AsesAio. We...L.-LS.-leJUILib'4'4•'' , r .'' • : , - • ... ' ''' 61.01tA4e.'4 Mims As•srwal.-f:ILRLIZw-lek S .:irre.:•911121=-' • l' .-'le:Jur° ,:xt;E7'....„."71.:.. ' ' V-.,•• i7--7. ;, • -.7-7,-j •• LlItP4AC rcudol rig togy rit'Antri.‘.. ,.,.......",. ':..,..•., .; s '..., .. ' •,- ,'. -. . :-.••• . , „," • 4.,,ca.semo i ia , •I • z,-=,,:ha 4'IN4cm,mi#1,954.:1 , • 7 , .' i'•...• -..1' -, ."'I • - i046111.1 iketot PM 140.I P•1.;;;Zr,p0,rjr.‘1-, •, ,'' . ,:`,..,,, ,:' ,,. :, • 0 I ti,4.Irr,,,,,e..UI 1 -"\, ' 04 • - 111 [1llllllYll ..." ._ n„ol.+., Il ltl u uuo WORT•H . S\© ' , E T , IEAO sOTK ELEVATIONU r c f a lie wax T.M!1O `._ 15 rt./••euG.t'ur, iy I' 1 i Mr...I " .'cIt ryr7 H 1,' ,u,no,- I' . , i .. 1 . w r 'ti ee.,M. .,- W1RtS HasH unu: s, sG1i.'T_. So1 JS a..in' tO -101•5T TO GUNK n Tf_ ` circ,rsa.,.:•.. li-. ii,nt•iww-- "--N ' AI,' r++ui_ea o(["v*ti). ItADE....._ 1 u _ q LyUIxW !N6 DMt1.IT V.- i 1 NUJ.' L:/': I. d l L•1,1W, MS MVf1.•' ' AWt, '4t.101Jal 1411u4_ . - s G. \OSE Nr M:•-, 4TOR•i•4e A PAer %V.rICi.4 w%wud. - - r p/•' ' -OW A,MAO c' AT 4217•ZO 12M-.STR-4.1,', 2` • icon' 3' I Rl11TOu WNNifJ4T0 1 1• - . r ro7 I G14,N1R/.fiG Cou M1 I.0{,\l l71N rtMIT' I I.7.16lGI W lfi.WAw4 Airl.Lip1,MIY euyknous j' dt>cnod+• ti OF R. 1 Ssr a, ' O THE CITY OF RENTON U ` `' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o rn BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR G LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0 9I t D SEP-C° December 29, 1980 Mr. Larry Brown Western Pacific Properties 2.112 3rd Avenue, Suite 401 Seattle, WA 98121 RE: File No. SA-103-80; C.G. Mirante Construction Company. Dear Mr. Brown: This is to notify you that the above referenced application, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of December 9, 1980, has not been appealed within the time period establ.ished by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is final , and the file is being transmitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J . Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 9th day of December 1980 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. 21;444.141, 74,1;97R‘,404,4.94,1 C" Subscribed and sworn this - day of k)ecalv\Oer'19 $O . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Pv oY1 Appliication, Petition or Case: C.G. Mirante Construction Co. ; SA-103-80 The mi.nutez contain a tiist a6 -the pansies .o necand. ) December 9, 1980 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION, APPLICANT: C. G. Mirante Construction Company FILE NO. SA-103-80 LOCATION: Vicinity of 519 S.W. 12th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site approval for a +2500 square foot building to be used as a light assembly and storage facility for a cabinet contractor. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on November 25, 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on December 2, 1980 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Steve Munson, Planning Department, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan with staff comments The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Larry Brown Western Pacific Properties 2112 3rd Avenue, Suite 401 Seattle, WA 98121 Mr. Brown indicated concurrence in the report, but requested clarification of Engineering Division requirements to improve the alley a distance of 90 feet from the subject site to Seneca Avenue S.W. since the property abuts only 60 feet of the alley. He also inquired regarding the duration of the site approval in the event the applicant elects to delay development. The Examiner referenced Section 4-3014 which .specifies a two year period prior to expiration of the site approval , with an extension allowed through request to the Examiner for good cause shown. Mr. Brown also questioned the 42-inch height limitation on fencing in the front yard setback referenced in Section L. 11 of the staff report. Mr. Blaylock discussed provisions of the ordinance which specify a height limitation which can be increased only of storage facilities are proposed or if no doors exist on that side of the building. Mr. Brown stated his opinion that since landscaping was not required on the westerly side of the building in the previously executed restrictive covenants and the landscaping would be adjacent to a warehouse building wall , it would be less expensive to erect a six foot fence, at least on that portion of the site not in the front yard setback, than providing five feet of landscaping and a 42-inch fence. The Examiner noted the applicant 's option to apply for a variance if criteria for such application can be satisfied. Responding to Mr. Brown's inquiry regarding improvement of the alleyway, Mr. Blaylock noted that the requirement had been imposed because one of the required parking spaces is proposed off of the alley and will require access to the public right-of-way. Mr. Brown inquired if the applicant can recoup some of the expense of that improvement when remaining properties are developed in the near future. The Examiner indicated uncertainty regarding latecomers fees for access improvements, and suggested that the Planning Department could research the matter. He also noted that if no legislation currently exists regarding the matter, a .revision to the ordinance could be proposed to the City SF 13-80 Page Two Council . The Examiner requested further testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. Mr. Brown inquired regarding waiving the applicant 's fencing requirement if adjacent property to the west was developed prior to the applicant's proposal and fencing was required through site approval . The Examiner stated his opinion that either party could erect a fence on his own property or a single fence could be installed on the boundary line with expenses shared through a joint agreement. The Examiner requested final comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding File No. SA-103-80 was closed by the Examiner at 9:22 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for site plan approval of a light assembly and storage facility. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 6. The subject property is located at 519 S.W. 12th Street between Seneca Avenue S.W. and Lind Avenue S.W. The parcel is 60 feet wide by 100 feet deep, or 6,000 square feet in area. 7. An existing single family home located on the property will be incorporated into the new facility which will be approximately 2,500 square feet in area. 8. The applicant intends to provide three (3) parking spaces on site as required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance (Section 4-2208(3) (A)) . If the applicant were to conduct sales from this facility additional parking space would be required. The Planning Department indicated that the three parking spaces are probably insufficient. 9. The zoning to the east i.s G-6000 (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 6,000 square feet) . The subject property and properties to the west and south are zoned L-1 (Light Industry) . 10. The rezone of the subject property to L-1 required site review by the Examiner and provision of a 20-foot setback along the north or front property line and a 10-foot setback along both the east and west property lines. Further, no outside storage was permitted outside of the building envelope and then only within a view obscuring fence. 11 . Pursuant to Section 4-2205, all loading and unloading must take place within the confines of the subject site and no part of any loading or unloading may take place on any public street or alley nor may any portion of any vehicle used in such operations project onto any public street or alley. The plans indicated loading space will be provided along the front of the planned facility. 12. On-site storm water retention and detention is required for the subject proposal . 13. The applicant proposes erecting a six foot view obscuring fence on the western boundary of the subject property. Section 4-717(C) provides that no fence bounding a front yard along the front or side property lines may exceed 42 inches in height. 14. The Building Department indicated that fire doors are required on the proposed structure if the rear wall is located immediately adjacent to the alley. If a setback of two feet is observed, the fire doors would not be required (Table 5A of the Uniform Building Code, as amended) . 15. The alley to the rear of the subject property must be improved pursuant to Ordinance 3214, as amended. SA- -80 Page Three 16. The Traffic Engineering Division has. indicated that a fee of $20.00 per vehicle trip per day is required and the subject property will generate approximately 14 trips per day. 17. The applicant submitted conceptual landscape plans for the subject proposal . CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The proposed site plan appears to be compatible with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal provides landscaping and setbacks similar to that required of manufacturing park types of development, the type of use designated for this area in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal must comply with the general construction and building codes of the City of Renton including the Building and Fire Codes and the Storm Drainage Ordinance. 3. The proposed fence may not exceed 42 inches along either the front property line or along those portions of the side property lines which bound the front yard. Since the front yard is 20 feet deep, the fence may exceed the 42-inch limit rear of the front yard setback. The applicant may apply for a variance pursuant to Section 4-722(G) (1 ) if the criteria enumerated in that subsection can be demonstrated by the applicant. 4. A specific landscaping plan will have to be submitted and reviewed and approved when tFe applicant applies for the building permit. 5. The site approval process, unlike the Subdivision Ordinance, does not permit the Examiner nor the city to impose a general fee for the improvement of the various traffic ways in. the vicinity of a subject proposal . Therefore the $20.00 fee imposed for each trip generated does not appear to be a permissible condition of site plan approval . The imposition of such a fee during site plan review would unfairly impose costs on only those whose properties require Hearing Examiner review: This decision in no way affects the ability of the city to collect such fees under other provisions of the codes, ordinances and regulations of the city which allow for such collection. DECISION: The proposed site plan is approved subject to: 1 . Submission of and review and approval of specific landscape plans. 2. Modification of the screening fence to comply with the provisions of Section 4-717(A) . ORDERED THIS 9th day of December, 1980. 1 Fred J. Ka man Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of December, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Larry Brown, Western Pacific Properties, 2112 3rd Avenue, Suite 401 , Seattle, WA 98121 TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of December, 1980 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney SA-1u3-80 Page Four Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before December 23, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. j. it' t' ) ' 6 e P U G I I A e . 3 if. r. A pt-. .,..., L ,. is 4 4 I "• P.-, . 2) AY S ; I,' 4.; 4 7 : lb . ' Z '+, •• '''.-- 0 • 0 ' b1 it 1 A.—----------- ..-- r, 0.,*. 8 •! i h CA v. V Imo" Z. 5 1al' k3 tT v i i 7 X 045 1. 1 ''. i''' Di..... r. r' vr,.. 6'. 11- 4,-.' .'" .- 1 79 , ti = 7 f D pplo 1 yOR: L;- L54hA AA'' • yr vh, C30 3- 3° i I9 1 Y 44 W 1 1 rI Y . J 5 ¢ 3 o IIl T J' J 1i IQgIga s1 i ' 42- I 1 s ' 4 r3 40 1 i deb e irl.5. 7. 3 6 ,, vr. a I r* g a 011ir N. ii: a24000k. S) 3Z 33a r' C2 1 " i J : 1i y i ILi1 L-- 7 V 1 1 I , y 1 S CO t r' S r :' JY: tli otalt- 5i. . 55a ra ib ' 8 2 k Il I.`‘. s. 1. 5-• i\ i: rrl.. ,\ 14.. e, , 1,1 4.. 1: o7r 4......___________ 4 o, 66o l , tI o l 5 • acO-, 0 a- 3 z o o ` r , ' ?' r , k k 4 1 ' S- S J 1 L 4,, I. a t." 1 l' 0 •• Z 14' 1 B I tb1 k9 • 30. 0 , q Ir , O• Z , S a• 4 r'•• Cs I4- 13 r. 0... r:','° a 0 I. g5 a 4. 1 r t. 1 , a t 0.:: a a 6 ,... .. . 404 I/ la gill a Z 01 , t c29 S'' 4 G• if 1` 1 GC, , / 15 ii L7 1 6 S UI A 9 4- 1. 1 q 8 f r II . J% - 1-' % 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELI4MINA0RY REPORT TO THE HEA1',IING EXAIMIINER PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 2, 1980 APPLICANT : C .G. MIRANTE CONSTRUCTION CO . FILE NUMBER : SA-103-80 A . SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site approval for a ±250O square foot building to be used as a light assembly and storage i facility for a cabinet contractor. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record: OLGA LEWIS 2 . Applicant : C . G. MIRANTE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 3 . Location : Vicinity Map Attached) Vicinity of 519 S .W. 12th Street 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property: 6000 sq . ft . 6 . Access :Via S .W. 12th Street 7 . Existing Zoning : L-1 , Light Industrial 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : R-4, L-1 , Light Industry ; r G-6000 , Residence Single Family ; minimum lot size 6000 square feet 1 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on November 19, 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on November 21 , 1980 . C . ' DI sTOR YPAEKGR®UIND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 of April 14, 1959 and zoned G-6000 at that time. It was rezoned to L-1 by Ordinance #3482 of November 12, 1980 , with restrictive covenant requiring site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : C.G. MIRANTE CONSTRUCTION CO . , SA-103-80 DECEMBER 2, 1980 PAGE TWO D PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site is basically level . 2 . Soils : Urban Land (Ur) . This soil is land that has beeen modified by disturbance of the natural layers with the addition of fill up to several feet thick to accommodate industry or housing. 3. Vegetation : The natural vegetation was removed from the site with the construction of the single family residence. 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may . provide some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5 . Water : No surface water was observed at the time of on-site inspection on September 12, 1980. 6. Land Use : An older single family residence presently. occupies the site . E ; NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties consist of older single family residences and developing commercial and light industrial facilities. F. PIUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer : An 8" sanitary sewer is located adjacent to the southerly border of the subject site while 6" water mains extend north-south on Seneca Avenue S .W. and east-west on S.W. 12th Street . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton. Fire Department as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #145 operates along S .W. Grady Way within 500 feet to the north of the subject site while Route #150 runs along Rainier Avenue South within 1/4 mile to the east . 4. Schools : Not Applicable 5 . Recreation : Not Applicable G ' APPLICAIxLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-712 ; L-1 , Light Industry District . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June 1976 I .' IMPACT ON THE NATURAL O i lQF AN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Minor 2. Population/Employment : Minor I PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : C . G. MIRANTE CONSTRUCTION, SA-103-80 DECEMBER 2, 1980 PAGE THREE 3 . Schools : Not Applicable. 4. Social : Development of. the subject site may result in increased opportunities for social interaction among the facilities ' employees . 5. Traffic : Approval for and construction of the proposed facility will result in a traffic increase of approximately. 14 trips per day on S .W. 12th Street . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD TETE(RIMINIATI®IM: Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy . Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance was issued for the subject proposal on November 129 1980 by the ERC . K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division . . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The proposed use is for a building to be used as a light assembly and storage facility for a cabinet contractor and can be considered a permitted use within the L-1 zone . . 2 . In the rezone approval of November 12, 1980 , the Hearing Examiner attached the following conditions : 1 ) Provision of a 20-foot setback along the north property line of which the northern 10 feet is to be landscaped. 2) - Provision of 10-foot setbacks along both the east and west property line. 3) No outside storage unless contained within view obscurring fences and then only within the building envelope permitted by the Zoning Code . Staff review of the submitted site plan indicates that all of the above conditions have been complied with. 3 . Eventhough three parking spaces are provided as required per Section 4-2208 (3)A of the Parking and Loading Ordinance, it is estimated that more than three people will be employed in the business . 4. The site plan also indicates a 5 ' wide landscaping strip along the easterly property line as required by Section 4-2204 8B-1 of the Parking & Loading Oridnance. 5 . All other requirements of the L-1 zone appear to have been complied with (Section 4-712) . 6 . The Engineering Division of the Public Works Dept . advises that on-site storm water retention/detention and off-site improvements along S .W. 12th Street will be required . It is also urged that the site frontage along the alley on the southerly portion of the property line be improved unless a waiver iQ ranuirpd (see comments) . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT. TO THE HEARING EXAMINER . PUBLIC HEARING : C .G . MIRANTE CONSTRUCTION, SA-103-80 DECEMBER 2, 1980 PACE FOUR 7 . A water main extension and plan will be required as per Utilities Division comment . Standard hookup Aeesp efrorF iwraeteDre paanrdt meenwer ewqiulilr eamesnot sa,ppalpr e-ceoenother remarks . 8 . struction conference with the Fire Marshall will be necessary . 9 . Fire doors are required on the. south side of the proposed structure adjacent to the alley unless the building is moved two feet northerly as indicated by the Building Division . 10 . The Traffic Engineering Division recommends the assessment of a $20 roadway improvement fee per average daily trip generated (14 trips x $20 280) . 11 . A six foot high fence is proposed along the western property line . This would conflict with the 42" maximum Section 4-717A) heighih in a front yard. Since no doors are anticipated on the west side of the building, landscaping could be placed between the fence and the building. The building should be screened by a combination of landscaping and a . 42" high fence. 12 . The conceptual landscape plan as submitted appears to meet the intent of the Parking . & Loading . Ordinance. However , details of size , spacing, quantity , and type need to be more clearly addressed. A specific plan will have to be submitted with plans for a building permit and Planning Department approval will be necessary . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the foregoing analysis, recommend approval of the proposed site plan; subject to : Satisfaction of items L-6 through L-11. i 1 .../ ....4C't w— 7TN— h+ f t.5;.• I r ti 1 m1 r7`r' j_________, --,,,„.z- . 1 u 601) ..le i Is Va." a. I I I a.=,:41 II p1111 & 11g11111 re,1\ QN AG i1G .1 c illlll Il; "11.11111101. ") u llt lllhh I 1,., R µe ,113In1111A1 1 1 II'1 1 -' U !, ' (•I 6. R .3 `. N1Ij'IIh!_I!; 1( i . n'1`j11II ktiLUIIII Illlllllr';• y 1y lllll ti..1 dllln- WOO Ili,. i-,I ;;,%iNll 41,1110 III I IIIIi.glirliili,ilt,,dlll 1011 II4I % I- T IIIIII : .1. gllll-li I4{°I y. 0i"" ,. .III 1 lI W!..,F x. II., ,... — ----;II 0 /40,.,.- p1 t ay r wWUllll.i it, 1 • L- 1/ Iy ulll r! : a. is it i =,'i i.,.. 1 a. \. 1 ii IIit I it ILl i,t1,1 r __p'Y _ I Ft k r. LIb 1 r _ Wr Yi .y lui? 1,1 -- I TTT"""_ i i• i ' nWI• t. J f _21. _ .I -J 1----L-- 1 I--- T---IV--1.--_I I- 1 - 1 '---1-'S-, 7 F - - 1' -- , --- 1 it 4.--l Iv_ _-I 7' 1 11-rrT{: =C I- - -. L• -; y- ,tJl S _ .. - .- •. '4 W"" =•. 1 tit+ g tirtiij)fQ D0 1/yTlOt. CLAIM',,,, a„ — 1I I I u i f - ---f mc...... , Mil._., N)) i Ilk—. 1 1 rr.. P. asm r t p II 1 E aew s L H - r C env. s 1 II 1 Y t Y II 4 6 1 f I LST9fir II O J Fil ifs 1. rr.:.n..., ..,...,......_., ...,,,,. w..,y..- ..a:v'.en...,..sseeary:-wi: zc.:.c 2nr:r..r..:•.e._s..,tom..':... r.. c.....,u,..:vew•a•,c we-xsaxm r.-..•... s•uasafa.+e lxn.nx B.t&"..•,..... 1+ 1,1 I C.G. MIRANTE CONSTRUCTION CO. SITE APPROVAL i SA-103-80 APPLICANT C.G. Mirante TOTAL AREA ±6, 000 Square Ft. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via S.W. 12th Street L-1, Light Industrial *with restrictive covenants. ' y EXISTING ZONING EXISTING USE Single Family Residential 1 Construction of a 2 , 500 square foot building designed IPROPOSED USE for use as a light assembly and- storage facility. ManufacturingLANDUSEPLANManug Park t COMMENTS 1 S I L c a`' ..'<3= i,,,§ w , r1am;.g.., fa+rp - Y Y7 Y 41' ts'n, ty•,, N ki p 6 x r F ; n . tt4. t al+.7 ,F F T. X4 q" u,• Y 11ic.i tee X..4 k'^4aLR' 4= 5,,.e4,4 1 fx ` ' ,+` @• w.eTra i &"— :a i r '•, R n '>?rA -d y i 4ai v 1,. i14 r ` a y'5/1 % l` " IPs i . ' ''` "r dJ !{ J i i ' i. I`, F ,:, a` -- r..,'S'4 F, sr v,d' q x ' A rq ;y: is a tt v...$'.1 .. 24 ly r:..1 j .0 i4 Yb t ,v !f by. a1",{{;xgR , t ti & rk+:i' t'iE t- a tt 4. 1: ,( ti 1 ii. y, , i. 2& , a 'M' ,. air, " ai. ,} -g, ,t`,, ..1 • P ''i, N+=1°' MI a i• + EX"l }fk-- ch i•.1 + h '` a•'Fn S •...x a 1::.9?'•.. 2 t': F' a`,,,t ; f • 1•,, -.w1 ,.. `. 6' '4a,'e,iu S.;- „:44 °„ l + g•,`;, Hl, (,, F' 't t x2af. ey l/4''i.lx G ,peft{.:' } 7.1tdr t6't E ,• ` p ii t a• • < JJ 1. r,F l'! F t 1/•. t j i Sr+'4 tat i.F i ,, 1 4.. , ay'.•;,' 'Y A d . a t. a 1s:4, 1P r..,:,,ia l} I}i a ai t t; ct: 3 x f Y'>' 11 tyy` }t j. y; P , tl { I GGGP I ARLINGTI .. p::::t f.,,-,y,:, v xx i*'tt 4 Ili r k gyp, t i,'4:',`il''t4! a 4- .ilt'i n, y•`'. n aos+ b 'ivsrj' f V'" 04 r'rr "1: ,.ts1.•ei+ 1-... g:. +q a. ' a. w7A' • f.7+ .' ( A :,. a tiw_`y 71114,,,,,,—, Pi l ' ?, J. iv."'J! 1 n—,y i ce , w ;re39 .f, I I*' - 0."'"'"' ••=4"-4k'.•6i* •-,«P ‘, — . >..,1 147 -aylf_..j,,,,„),i-4-• 1 : i, .. , tt A a t 4A 1'C xI `W... I M.yY.:r /,;',(!.V'4 V.MkRa.Ml MMV1, p{4pf. l M 4 kkn W DCMatr • ' w'w'b' 1.0 n•.+wr~x':.rar., . n r 4'a«;+' `w s err4= 7 x rk•N+ r.+.rr.,; sc YWr'.` a:..+. a C'1G 4+Ji I M5:1"„•'G.'MiW'A+'Y,:hW RMfFF1'm+V+ i1,= A 1 R, sR y{* x y.a' y„:fr`" n, ,.. s v _ di,ar Q. aet ,". Nr & t e`` 1 .V t i 1, t ` '. i l i r + P' • i1,w r- ...erg 1 d 7 .....t.. f4 5 F 'it .K, r,W a a,M. 41 _ w,a• t a"d'. xp`r• SG 1$cS_...., .. i ... :lv'"'+.':fC'''` - ,,, .J" .. ",ShiNi<,*'W•....m.a,., I! -ii, • 3 ,«.....eren s ,« ;to A-% • 4 141.1. .4 nd. . rc ,! t. Y" 'e Y 1, : g,..si 'i*a-- 11 X4, F y[]Z L. d'dlti' .;s` Pt N';, L.3. .r..„:x,e § 1•i t ` A v d ,>2'i` yJ na bFu y "t j:=.}Is t r}•r t S1.,;•/ , sry i'Vt1 I,d- i: ;.t';' ,it ' R. i •lf, r kw,9,9" I.,j, .,i::, '.1 ti a i;, `.4...ig v, 1. 7'! A'` t 5a atq_ F•, 1 i. ,( p ,. :. _•+1,?,14`Yc.,I f.. . i. .'.ir''. 4'''q '. ' t 1`..c•' t[., • +a S'r1 S4 Sr(°; .r.;3 ''''''- ,,,.;t.f;:ya .,i...V•.,k.',µ•±-. 1%.4, •,,e414 ,+]l;4],,,, `.;'A,, JNI' i''':i", .f'' ',1t' {:} 2'.' t,j' 0.."} IP+V n". ., a. t' 4' } i ' 4 F + r R' i '' 'x:i t;..! x •,, ' f 4,P, 3't3s .x :: Yl n.1. k.1 t, .l aY., ,.,,. I ' r,=•',t i t5 ',.' j•''t .: A 1'F ,, $ t. e• ti•: t i't:, , O.' ,F :,'.:;'`+', r.44.' r,, q S P Ky$1. "'• 6t w a ;e ). aJ 7 i,,st ..^YI i ;1••• , 1 d'4'l.; , Viz, Cl , a.a nyr' a,; •, A ..,: kyl. . 'Yil •fi xV' 1• ^,re,.F 1f 3 .I.n.`5k a` F '66Y9 G AN${ t t,py x4 1:'r$',, gyy`p A+. ' y i.$L Y.•'p! al'•',•i'{''( mAe a E 7JN 15•. .} .M,•, '1,, , kS MNar4.• X'Y;{e s'. Y' l C _„4 .fix gg.(' S.t t:,.RS., PG•• ! d t, r`'' a. a . t.r1 'J iW ' .,_ 4?.;'.5" '3wS.t "' i""r( `t'„p• i'' '' t. i .'S; u. `• e 1 t J. Lid ,:77,. 7ti2°'1:4 , A . a'i', r°'' ,-it ;"=g{'t} 5 .1.' a` is 41 li. ,1,, L.. c1\„:1•414',It;,,q,',Lti,.%,g ,„ultriS"v. ' ''C/"----.' . Ri z- ,i,Fax``..K,p tl "'2.-cc.•Y ,E,,j` , .l.. •i:. r q,}- r .74^ .S J ,i, •.ItT4U. •,,,,ii . -,,,,,,e, 2.:•":,P141,4 N\ ... 'g' nt; '.zio ti..'22,,'Pt , At a'.-' e..f.;,,l.s i+' :1,u:'. ,L''7.P e' Q XI --it\I 3 :- . L...—_,LC A -AG-RI iU E,J L- LI Li& i' Ik:PLIt Y sr- 3NG-L EAMi L H I -- HA\/Y 1 kiPLi,fRy L j7-- LOv/ 7 Jsl-rY MiJ L • M t MvJU EA11J RIc;- PARK MP- 1-1 " M 2iLJM "IF NJii1Y L C -- g C, 1-11G1 M1 r1Y ML]151 C.G. MIRAPJTE CONSTRUCTION P R'FARK571 cR Al®Ll SITE APPROVAL r- UL /QLE31 • PL1E3LIc, i' MAJR( I ft. i I 1 If- d: 'q, QG PhStSaS'O A4srisbL o:C. k:ri s A elnls muu c)114(.41/ fo r ie. K- I , d'PLtNTfi4-A erir 7. OIOb 4 t i - `i w` 73 su 1 di -_ ; s.=-#.•----w_0.- ___.1 •. 7 FswYlmb QD er`.I n sa Leta&Om 1 j 1 r rre Jt ssrves auus Dtnr arty 8 I e.•'alMrr DMA laskD TO..Ail Aka Nla .m73tt0 ®lI 4 y fY065 TO TbwiN F1 o.7Rb Nutty EA 7 yyyi' Jf IS3'•bss6f f7r6(A akRr S"/OdaAL VII•tams. - l• Iroc4.., SJ'HnJ. -1 tcF el, _,„. 0Kow- Re t , SAl1TMlR ARPA'*' GLGA,iL'.k.- J 4X.M 6C4 he.4. j r_X 1 1 i! i CMG is',-----•m.. — :.f i'J'` It GONT:•FL4 L`j,17 .- I_•,rt?LIH iAU TT f .. 1 F\-a'J—t ' i _ K1p R Ce. __ c ul_ or.A4c •. .JTa I'Trr. 1 SAL T6GZtIP J. i S r111arau Qi.:Mli.tar., r _ Las Z ,4 IS elc cJ,yt = ® taigaMSaaNW a,At6C4.1 TD.J 4A Jd I aAr7k kE°J1sL'ld', NA34141dB1:•L 1 tIrsl 4CueR L' PTi: m•YC f ', t., t4 U.. L wee cur..c K.aK..,,u,u aT et:, . mcaao c..12. otGUP/U{ T A1P'i3ii4;1T•O' 4'-0•' A IO o' a. e-Iwo. Ar.,e,s,a. Lp Qa5I1DK.`ION: A uly'9:A1AuG'. 8 CBN 6 it _ - Gx fl 11I'pltWpS q ue.•,"i•i1-isi51 . Ot31GN1L ZGML'.. A. .. €'d'Is\DtA1 c1 OM,j .L 3 LJiPA•! 49A7: Zq,•.,•.T.0 rid, 4s.stork 19r1. p A vsLaaa.i toot usAa15: ,I .. g 1 smurow clam: Arm Visit, IeAv2..40 a.scmtw6•l. 1,=- pt-[ Lam • *LA%DIA 4Ro.at' T L.eAtielI Ir ew+as Ane nsa+.T non-our;f MkUD zorts.M. , BY*.5,,1.* PNR •MCM pat 44W,ASaD We-t..L®, RULa,4 A11.• EaAt .L rite.'. 1 TstSwM61 imuti rIR .a l P-p ti4•.. w T SVJiA4¢ 11 L7.P.T3 I ut i 1 POSTS: rag 1'li. 10.1 r•c.8• \. a pw.a,,wa i AT A214-20 l2TM tarmeoYiwTb: r1ftA r.A N4 f •`• Roo 4.1. awa•.N.MAW R@AITGT7.1 WASn,IJ N rep YRAt,dA 1L..t.•iLi il tA1 1.66 6o'S6AA.JL IW'T/sELi Lb J.Y..6. wucu la.w.aa.w,w M. G .MI€SA4'Te. CJaiSt[iL"G.l,luL. r tout,as,•.. tools 0./W c IJLJtAA GY.Tl, l'y Te 4 l 1 a a: eo- TTT gI,41m 1-:,.:•1•...--g.,:----- -f--•..:•..-.-.:'•••• -",'.--1, -'.---•-• • --, - ,..,-.-:-_, ----: • • • -., ••• • • ..... . • .. - . - -.• •-. • • .• '.- - : ... .: :. •• - ". f..--,:.IF:-::-.f--).•:•_‘---t--'---F7.,_•.•-i 7.--7•&..„:7-4,..;-,.-._::: -.,- - • • • • -.-, '_", ------:: ---• _•'..• •-•-,_....-_ '__•.-....•..••••••••-• : -, ' -- - _ - 1 • j i 1:- rrs'N 1,".:'. -:.:-''''/V ,'''N . -;. - ,- --:' ''. ': '- Ii•-,: ,A. A,1 .,,-, -.., - A , .-, t;',.. ,:•••.'••. _ -.. .. . ,..jr •414 ' ' ' : : ' -:: - N : .- - . 7.1,1'F.1 IFS.oe''.• ' , ,•,..-: •'.- -:,...,.?.?"..Ic ...."•• ".•,,-.-•„.„-•; ',.rco• -•<-I", ; 1. ligI .., .• I .— : .. 1'?7,:,. v•,:. •.. I.-'' .Y.-'1.2., .,' ', - •;7•;-., s,' • .. '..•... : .-• , ,•1 -,_...:___:_::__ 7..:'LI ' . i i Ilii 1' . .. ',,ii 1 li i, . •! 16••••Vall171 .I I'ilit k III 1 IaIi1. ' • -- r:',.r..,-•-::::'.7,.-•- ' ..i..._-',''1- ' . :1-`,‘.11. --:. •'.. ... ' . . • - 1 ' ,',1.. l:„-.. ...",ip,',... .::::::::2-..:',- ,,•i!'';•:‘- .-:Ir' ;:7 ' ,1,i -' • --:'-: • --- 2: -.1.:',''',"-':7:;:7 -`''''.-- , -'''' '': --i -•':.• i :- . . :-. _ ': •- ''' . VIVA E: -' :.:7; 1 NORT F-1 t.-\/NS. P.b.1..• • • _-... ., 1.- -EAST • . . ELEV,44101-k SPVT).Li L-EVAT k0t,l . i- • - --- •(--,.... - - ,, /,'. , . 10.1.-0. • -- NN,...., ,7.,,,• .- • ' i- •••,,--,.- k „ i ED o c A •I L. . .. . . W E ST •• ML EVA-1101.J igliv-b'r" CIKLATIas 444 St= L A ' • 4kill wiiimmiliiirdrie..i..-7111C1-M9- fib it. _r It2644;Mt....A a ITHRISS21 r. al Vec72;01.:2:crcell. ' - • . ile?..rt.W.--*.• .•' A41414Dfrr g340,. . - •! . h • ams•mart ••••••••„....4. • i 1 4,CrtylVir- ----\".**PAAJA, 4413 11...././ 7 Aavk --- '--4.111.4 1.4.92.43 2_•f,4214 tt.441.A.AlICIA •' IT%MILLAIS 1d tar SIVO-9'21444h 44i11%4441444 7919=0 — •• , earciagsramarirs.i.e.lnur• r.13 g406.64_ . gip' WyPtian4 vkAiii,,rakcia pima') ' .3TUrtlifilli" 1 .ttartn4,_.....;.. irrumetlistarAtomurr". 4.),/,1 4110417.e.• - ' Igagsftra Vitio du.. .• - S -a ,_,,'-.:,,, r_r27..: fri• Z.0., ,..--., . 440 aie•Wate :. , il.6LAD,044 eiroasrit.., tS to?IrtitA.Air.Vil 14-41,14 4,A,,4 4 MA l'.0. - • IlihC AL INA4.4. r4k4,1:tif• <•,7,04,1- • SE.C.Ttotu 5...ec.m.s71„..1 AN, , . 1.4Vit'-Or . ' 2. -_ -• • , . swk...4.e.4 PAIXT7 k.heVie514 t...A..1.10.,C4 ,. • 04." A ' AT 4210.20 MI.*vriceaT10..11 Itiliak PL ge11101.4. 1.1#41411,14.11.161 "Lig ,-...ma41 Ail C OM 1 I PIN 1111LIT C-.4.14111A141t C.1441,11OJCII0o-1,ii.tC•. MM.ay.)sItaleallGlyit ISM IASI Deb WI a • I iGUVA-146•11, 4 eacnout vaiy.eo•ke.4 rtr+6,JkaA pAit:eik.la. __. ._______ . , , L I loI2 M Planning 12.1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEWW SHEET Application : 7 re' ,5o,4 d use ,ez 5 0.: t 617 I6,S7®tde is ei/I s.et_ S1st - Location : cove Applicant : Cc. Milkditk+, eit n e e: Ca . Parks De artmentTO: P • SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : fa®S Police Department A, R, C, MEETING DATE :4 I Public Works Department E. f- , am Op ill SIV g Engineering Division jam Traffic Engineering C)( C ',W.\) e° c Building Division Z. 2O Utilities Engineering ii cU F re Department 40, ci-tl Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS, REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON if®v® AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PR VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON • 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved f,Q- 61vNS l7a/G%c>,L) C'),iiu1 /c)7L fi Vu/iecc Cr/ri// --rr7ez--- L-f 7),:.Si-/3C Ydt ``/4f 4 1--e vi ,`erz_ri/iL/c i 1 1_ _ 7.____/L z.cf)----- ,-,_ 6 4?780 Si-natur of Director or Au orized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : v lit, y . Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 134g0/ INst4FF7C(e.wr Fine- f O1-S 1N /3/e4 Fug Maasc.o coAni-,4.,,.c o-t-s f}NO v-'1Br-.c C)CrL v-f1Qb/ (,ALL de 26Q1.t1/1150. eufai' e4r. 1 udw /1CQ4'.1cn_N rii)o(`Sa. -r ..0Z SYSgL-t p1.7i/, e4„, cr It "S-+u2 '' A 1513/o Sign 'ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date l®bwiteirogo Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : airEiVielediteAt -0,0,3-a4 ' r Soo'# 4/ f a - , e littassrlovAly `T.Viloikay-eledteibtflar ask AsAiitt÷ e"4"1 ifi t• ®, SI? iS , st Stncat on: O ty. Applicant:• MJIk 6Bero$®: co . TO: P s Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:_ itakkiat Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE: C,' Public Works Department 6.- I . tie 114S7049V) Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITINGFOR THE APPLICATION I REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON I® AT 9:U0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DPA•TMENTIDIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE Tp ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PR VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE LICApproved Approved with Conditions Not Approved i LT. D:1( 2 PERSSON 10/28/80 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date o e) Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : ®1 a ` so&+$®d, Location : coof t Appl i cant:i• p' 57 TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Rt Police Department A. R,C, MEETING DATE : illaige9 C eos°QPublicWorksDepartment En ineering Division 1 Traffic Engineering 0c/.; I:\\\,. a c), i ` if'` (;;``\'Building Division Utilities Engineering f Fire Department o - Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING' FOR THE APPLICATION REV NW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:UU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR; D'P'ARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE Tp AITEND THE ARC, PLEASE PR VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:0UP .M. ON 11/0-186 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : r/C E AI6 , AIEE,e //\!6 Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved C©. DO /? Q1 T 7 c1/Cl i/ ?Ct` PEr i~ J/P dilLla Oh r 73 /1, f%rs x 5-<#3 xa0,) e/pelg, 7/• Jo REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved x Approved with Conditions Not Approved L-) O H. 3) egen 4_04. s-A.)-41 7.) O/z Ves9 o 9SinatureofDirectororAuth . ized Repres ntative Da rizelg® Planning W 12 1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET App1ication :,SITE /ANIAL1 o rcowfrete s d Location : T f App1 i cant: ga ;`t ter. # ,"# COefAILO TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED NEARING DATE: _' /. / '( Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE ' x Public Works Department Be Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REV NW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON lif/ AT 9:UU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T TEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:AOU P .M. ON 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 416. (-0 (- Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signatures of- irector or Author zed Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s ) : SA-103-80 Environmental Checklist No . : ECF-613-80 Description of Proposal : Request for site approval (to construct a ±2500 sq . ft . building • to be used as a light assembly and storage Facility for a cabinet . contractor Proponent :C . G. MIRANTE CONSTRUCTION CO. I Location of Proposal :Vicinity of 519 S.W. 12th Street Lead Agency : Planning Department This -proposal was reviewed by the ERC on November 5 , 1980 , following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department . No oral comments. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-613-80 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet , prepared by: Steve Munson, Assistant Planner , DATED : 10-28-80 2) Applications : SA-103-80 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning, Building and Police Departments recommended declaration of non-significance be issued. Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS not required under RCW 43.21C .030( 2)-(c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely impact adjacent properties. Signatures : Soh E . Webley, Parks and Gor on Y. licksen Re r.eatio Dil'ectgp-' PlanninyDirector C. Warren G . Gonnason Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION : November 12. 1980 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: November 26,- 1980 Date I circulated : 45/2 V wc1® Comments due : /44/840 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF -4/.3 - S® APPLICATION No (s ) . SR-/Q3-0 4.56/lehA®reveL PROPONENT : C.C. arar+e C®,5 . " PROJECT TITLE ; 51bretfe /dt,.•A if5.fe4yl46/;fr • G,/ ;C`q Brief Description of Project : ,'______ _____ y jl/4111.ti co-IrvSOD -r°le use.k 40 lijidecoereelr .dory e6c 1t/ Ora Cc i'te f 9 TY LOCA-It ION : 14L41;47 eSE 671 Ski /7 SITE AREA : 140,000 BUILDING AREA (gross) It12$00 156. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) ;Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : P/ 5 ) Animal life : j,'"" 6) Noise : B/~ 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north :I'int(e '„;lY Me'Se'd G,,ie...9 east 1/454 s e 6'-1kfrdr44Ifrf a® south : Ji [ fr r aItaIy PeSiIewe.e west : Offf f Land use' conflicts : Af09N e View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : t/• r1 i s/J13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :VQ O a , traffic impacts : y/ 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : I 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health: 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Revieuied by : s5k_xc Syr d 1 itle : 5/5oa r qs n Date : I / 0/7-8/$® FORM: ERC-06 OF R4,, y THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 0 IA am. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 090 co' 235- 2550 0 SEP,E P November 18, 1980 C.G. MIRANTE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 3528 126th Avenue S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98006 Re: Application for site approval to construct a +2500 square foot building to be used as a light assembly and storage facility for a cabinet contractor; File No. SA-103-80; property located in the vicinity. of 519 S.W. 12th Street. Gentlemen: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on November 18, 1980. A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for December 2, 1980 at 9: 00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director 41% By: p - Rog r J. Braylock, J Associate Planner RJB:yb cc : Larry Brown, Western Pacific Properties, 2112 3rd Avenue Suite 401 , Seattle, Washington 98121 I s3 Ili , T` 5 ':w ff. i • r ;:q • , ' ., M1 i GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF 519 S.W. 1.2th STREET I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON• FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT I S' PASTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF I •. ,i•aaT- < i; E d rq "?.'s Itf yw I ' . . n . ,Gi . TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON ' DECEMBER 2, 1980 BEGINNING AT 9:00 AS MO PS M. CONCERNING • ITEM R.11 U • RE2ONi . U SPECIAL ' ERMi: VS ITE }`A; R • V L SQUARE SFOOT TBUILDING - FILE i# SA-103-80 a WAIVER USHO " EUNE A . iAu. .. 5 .+, 11 r.. RMITA FINAL DECLARATION OF NON--SIGNIFICANCE EXPIRATION OF EirAPPEAL PERIOD: NOVEMBER 26, 1980 FOR FURTHER INFORMATI{•F rx CALL 238 2553 THIS NOTICE NOT TO. BE REMOVED WITHOUT. PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON DECEMBER 2, 1980, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1 . C. G. MIRANTE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Application for site approval to construct a 2500 square foot building to be used as a light assembly and storage facility for a cabinet contractor; File No. SA-103-80; property located in the vicinity of 519 S.W. 12th Street Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 2, 1980, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: November 19, 1980 GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 14th day of November, 1980. SIGNED: FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s ) : SA-103-80 Environmental Checklist No . : ECF-613-80 Description of Proposal : Request for site approval (to construct a ±25OO sq . ft . building to be used as a light assembly and storage facility for a cabinet contractor Proponent : C . G . MIRANTE CONSTRUCTION CO . Location of Proposal :Vicinity of 519 S .W. 12th Street Lead Agency : Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on November 5 , 1980 , following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department . No oral comments. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-613-80 are the following : 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet , prepared by : Steve Munson , Assistant Planner , DATED : 10-28-80 2) Applications : SA-103-BO 3 ) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning, Building and Police Departments recommended declaration of non-significance be issued. Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS not required under RCW 43 .21C .O3O ( 2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance : Will not adversely impact adjacent properties . Signatures : Jphh E . Webley , Park) and KGord'on?Y ricsen Re/reation D ' ect9 Planning/DDirectori 3; Warren G . Gonnason Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION : November 12, 1980 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD : November 26, 1980 411 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON , WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC ) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects : 1 . C . G. MIRANTE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (ECF-613-80) Application for site approval to construct ±2500 sq . foot building to be used as a light assembly and storage facility for a cabinet contractor ; File No . SA-103-80 ; property located in the vicinity of 519 S .W. 12th Street 2 . CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (ECF-618-80) Application for environmental review on signalization and roadway widening at NE 4th and Union Avenue NE ( from 46 feet to 56 feet ) complete with curbs, gutters , sidewalks . The Environmental Review Committee has further issued a proposed declaration of non-significance for the following project : 3 . WALL & REDEKOP CORPORATION (ECF-619-80 ) Application for building permit to construct 75-unit condominium ( Rainier Crest Condominiums ) ; property located in the vicinity of 1190 Union Avenue N .E . The following mitigating measures must be complied with to assure that the environmental impacts are mitigated: 1 ) The site plan shall provide 100 sq . feet of on-site recreational space per unit . Total area is dependent upon the number of units. This area shall include a (1 ) swimming pool , ( 2) sport court and ( 3) tot lot . 2 . Off-site recreational needs shall be in the form of payment of park fees to equal $300 per unit times ultimate number of units . 3 . Payment of traffic fees to equal $20 times the number of daily vehicle trip ends generated by the project . 4 . Provide down stream sewer capacity to handle proposed project demand . Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department , Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550 . Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by November 26 , 1980 . Published : November 12, 1980 V ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 5 , 1980 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 1 . OLD BUSINESS : SP-047-80 ECF-567-80 MT. OLIVET CEMETERY COMPANY Application for special permit to fill and grade 11-acre expansion area ; property located north and east of existing Mt . Olivet Cemetery , east of NE 3rd Street , in the vicinity of 100 Blaine Avenue N.E . Continue to November 12th pending more information . SP-099-80 RAINIER SAND & GRAVEL CO . ECF-608-80 Application for special permit for fill and grade of approx . 450 ,000-500 ,000 cubic yards over life of project ; property located approx . 370 ' south of N .E . 3rd Street on hill east of Mt . Olivet Cemetery . 2 . NEW BUSINESS : SA-103-80 ECF-613-80 C . G. MIRANTE CONSTRUCTION CO. Application for site approval to construct 2500 sq . ft . building to be used as a light assembly and storage facility for a cabinet contractor ; property located vicinity of 519 SW 12th Street . ECF-618-80 CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS , Application for environmental review on signalization and roadway widening at NE 4th and Union Avenue N .E . ( from 46 ' to 56 ' complete with curbs, gutters, sidewalks) . B-239 WALL & REDEKOP CORPORATION ECF-619-80 Application for building permit for 75-unit condominium (Rainier Crest Condominiums ) ; property located 1190 Union Avenue N .E . B-240 RUSSELL D. BIRD, ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS ECF-620-80 Application for permit to erect free standing, two sided billboard sign for Ackerley Communications ; property located 4224 East Valley Road . Datecirculated : / / /2 0 Comments due : WOO ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEH SHEET ECF - 6I_ - _® APPLICATION No (s ) ...<4-/D3'Se)(S ngoedre teat)I 1PROPONENT : C.G. ieea ,y4'e. 5./. e.® . PROJECT TITLE :06- Ar.5 ,`45.rekm4' &di Brief Description of Project :je fla c 4 r t'4pter,,e,0 40-- d,iflIof9 ®1' '. S O 7'o/u ed a,4 iasse a/ 42Sit e&leCta t'l+elect( %,_a® ac -t LOCATION : !//)silly e,' 6/? o S SITE AREA : '- 4®/® BUILDING AREA (gross) ^0 ,G4 LA 1 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) [ Topographic changes : x 2 ) 1Direct/Indirect air quality :X 3) Water & water courses : 4) ,Plant ' life: 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : i south: west : f Land use conflicts : I View obstruction : 9) 1Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) ,Number of Dwellings : N,K 13 ) ;Trip ends ( ITE ) : jtraffic impacts : 14 ) [Public services : 15 ) Energy :X 16 ) [Utilities : Y 17 ) Human health : Y 18) [Aesthetics : C., 19 ) [Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : 1 Recommendation : D1SI X i. DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : C (17 C4a;1_-- t-le : Date :' 4. —2,P—t4C, FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : rj/a g/8'0 Comments due : /4/03p ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEY SHEET ECF !6a3 - 80 APPLI,,CATION No (s ) 3-$®Ode AfproveL PROPONENT : C.C. tra. t+s C®44s14- 69. PROJECT TITLE : 57cret e E 7.15 1k5seslatr Brief Description of Project :; fgapi , rretrAlp v9 °° e r 46 s4 pj"C4 1s®® s I e le 120 ai l fp er‘ce A/f/ird®i^Qf"6e't i'/6 *Or Codiaid; LOCA II I ON : 4Gtn;4 SPY SW c2 ' $'7 J c®..7.c-®r SITE AREA : Zi-gt)DOcA BUILDING AREA (gross ) -tQc®® 1 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 1 IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : j v 6 ) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north :4*lei(e 4. r eota-w 1 east : 5 e i ICA*Zrr G/s/r, / 51south : r' le teitQ PeSidlette west : hi 10 Land use conflicts : Milne ,41,49•Ix 42,,, View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :VaalVeive‘eliri traffic impacts : 14 ) ,Public services : 15 ) ',Energy: 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) 'Archeology/history : COMMENTS : CONCUR IN D.S .N. I . fit . D. Persson Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information_ I Reviewed by : litle : 151,5te ctr Ca Date : 61.,7-8/8D FORM: ERC-06 r_ CITY OF RENTON F RF APPLICATION 116 P[C 'c%D tko SITE APPROVAL OCT / 7 1980 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY iP File No. SA- /d.3 -go Filing Date f41 eVs" Application Fee $ Receipt No . Environmental Review Fee $ APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name C. G. Mirante Construction Inc. Phone 747-5151 Address 3528 126th Avenue S .E. Bellevue, WA 98006 2 . Property location 519 S.W. 12th Street Renton, WA 98055 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) Lots 27 and 28 , Block 26 of C.D. Hillmans Earlington Gardens Division No. 1 recorded in Volume 17 of plats, page 74 , records of King County, Washington, 4 . Number of acres or square feet 6 , 000 Present zoningG-6000 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? 2 ,500 Sq. Ft. Building designed for use as a light assembly and storage facility for a cabinet contractor. 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan . . . . 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. Rev, 1-77:' AFFIDAVIT OLGA LEWIS being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this -1 day of O e, 19 SD , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Kirkland An,/ Name of otary Public) Signture of Owner) 11715 N.E. 145th Street 519 S.W. 12th Street Address) Address) Renton, WA City) State) 228-6049 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules .. ulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the fili o w4r •lication . tiqh a y Date Received C) 9 By: COI 17 Io c Renton Planning Dept . G Dt°*2-7 3 ITY OF RENTON, WASH I NGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1 9i CCT 4 7 1E80 is FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ' pp 0 6 PDAlicatioriNo. Environmental Checklist No. Epe, - 6/3 -,pc. IDE? % PROPOSED, date:FINAL , date: 0 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance QDeclaration of Non-Significance Et Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS-: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of. 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations-of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide: Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental , review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime 'in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. ' NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name- of Proponent C. G. Mirante Construction Inc. 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 3528 126th Avenue S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98006 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Building of a 2 ,500 square foot light industrial shop facility on a 6 , 000 square foot parcel which is in the process of being rezoned to L-l. Also included will be parking for 3 vehicles and landscaping as follows: North 10 ' , East 5 ' West & South - none. INF 2- I 7. t!ocation of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : Situatelbetween Grady Way and I-405 in Earlington Gardens Plat. Located in the immediate area is vacant L-1 property, a duplex, a' house-, a welding shop, a pre-fab house display and a slate or terrazzo company. 8. Estimated date for ,completion of the proposal : Depending on financing availability 3/81 to 3/82/ 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : Rezone Building Permit 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further- activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: Moderize the existing- house for use as storage, lunchroom, bathroom, etc. . 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes , explain: No r 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Rezone Application i II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic X substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- X covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X Yam— MAYBE N0 d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YES MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , X either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO f) , Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or .any bay, inlet or lake? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: i 3- ti 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MACE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, 'either locally or X regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Slight dust emission from wood processing equip ment, such as saws, joiner etc. Adequate dust collection in house will be maintained. 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage pattern's , or the rate and amount of surface water runoffT X YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water Xbody? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface, water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available X for public water supplies?YES MAYBE NO Explanation: As required by development 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops , X microflora .and aquatic plants)?YES- MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE 'NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X_ YES MATTE NO Explanation: 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles,, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , X insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result _in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: As required by development. 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES WIFE NO Explanation: 8) ; Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: From residential to light_ industrial 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: X a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the, proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) X in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NO 1 Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: t - 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or X create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO 41. b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X. YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , X bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Per planning department analysis-less trips__now created by occupants. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE, NO c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: As required by the development 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO c) Water? R— YES MAYBE NO , 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage?X YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive X site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality-or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X YES M YBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that -the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue, in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: - signed 1 CARLO G. MIRANTE name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 NDING OF FILE FILE TITLE fr F. • O38O4.1111.11 i I