No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA80-126BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED SA 1 du* 126 - 80 v ;i- .,--;--,- , iiil u 6.Ate i•Cleth ROAM rel:4404'.6 i'eh:C. ilir:. Opo" Ir•..+1 C...e-oz••Ica.s&5 rOC. L P maw' '6..•c _ 4,, t 4N.,,,,, t,-1).K.° . . 4 it Pa.=• , -e .,D 6 4•:r-- " 4:7e!k,ir-,L-- c-a___,--.J,K—b me,rc,...,,es 40C, p ilikgt 14'.'..-'1'1.4-:-,,t1... Aor,..1.. • 71 zit 7 --ip.... .. J'3Vie -........ 8 8 4kwOrrA/Me t'eca 1 4 A.I. OMP.01' v. eiss4 t1 qi i -vpie-d 4-..4.1C er-fro Alla,i 5 X. 4 jr.....,..to. ..---------,___. 1,-c--,,..:•••it.9.-co-..c..-r-e oc. r., DT i,' kow orro 641o,r, it 4.011. el.•c-c •L c).,.. 041:,..- raw."1547MTZ ta-1 7, 7.,.....,,,GTP WITH c e CO 44P.Wik rimr--...,- I 1 ah(*iii-"P:11:"'*(. 441:.4").4iltiia IC4114$ 40. .._: ',., ...-.......- 0 PP.KIM : -111.40 1/1 PC49 Vanciit <1! I I ,.... f-- • =...-.4,•:-.,:z.,,,?,,,t- s...... Ole i.,.... . i!"."%rit•.... EV"..'ITT'-V-40-411ZIP 0 01.4,,......,0,,0 •0 3 IRV 1..•v-b,•imer,m-• r I.' 11/141 ivritTAL=r;e4 (.1, c)( § 22-4%.,..,, •'o.f; - '•ttat, VO'''IN ea0:1.• k:-;•••••,...0 . Mk's*fr' --..... 4 . s.••/.414W•0-6. .,.1.1kW:901.7.•„„ ip,m..,,,A,. 1 a 1 DECIDUOUS TREE En t, v.740,ria,or4OICOW040, 6 rta.ocr5,s,•••or..rAI E.ear, he tf.44 Z 11;__,.. ir,' s op r-r••••••0•0 rip urn-0-es t'00 f.4.4.2,1A.LO PDRIVIDDI la re oc,4 6 5-orrout"ritrs',4324..ceisA,cc. 4.•",..- i• 1-,,,,,,e4'G-fle ktrxe.44.60•)e.C., a a4 . 11,"r•••••••,•0 er7;utr,e4 e lac, 7-Ketvamr.,,•MEW:tile dor, ec-ezaut row rtfft.ao C•OZ.t I„/ ' t3 I.\ Jr.' Z if< tj•• I. 11.' 1.41f•rt4.. e C'e .> 71A1 rW 0 E 9 1iOr 11P- I-,60,1CA'ir.b WIlulti E•ioG.,i e`'1,.•:, 0! o P]. 1.,. 4., tcme--t, 4, f (,, ',', te1.3i:Mir,vZtPM-.•LA, T M6MgIrIMna51rb.ui-o. l: z;. E. 294R4,0IPe‘Vd. O o0•0(6.. _•• i NOTES: LOAOPTIaTCAMI.LOOPOT. TAnO. T. LPPS O•,. EALH.CLm0A. o RPAuPS PN1APe. l. r T1OTL.IORcr1 OIUaPNEIhXVMMNnLRO.GTcAREISnA.uNLHPP.GLOGEI. LO A.rtNP G C= T: OHEETO. m o1ENRR sO.R. D1aFT.I.: m 00T0E0S 9MI11b. TCPIO. AnaE. P CPTTC M EI. O FT1L1AAAI. 3 TNTNO..O. DDE 0 S11 MCT6L1OOTA1A E.CPCWAEMT TS O 1. P6O.PAC1O1T131.10.-11 O•.7..,.Ak,', C.... m- 1, I 1 41tL"14tZ1'.'. 6'i4.*age a o• li A,:.. 2, 7S,, 44- a rt ir6 i peetePe 0 mr il...l-.. 1! i:t..: r14..' 1.•1 r.. I. i.'.. I AIE PaC0.-2. r...,,. 7. s.,•,• 7• P'4• V' OVWgN trP..a10&t 1lM. 4, g7iaro=ni = 1 MTA E: A t S-RUS CONIFEROUS TREE I rAierr.mP'Z> J4LI NO trAar ti,61.04.111 1. 1 _ 6 .3 shrt,aaaaa to be trou6.1. . •ht. FM*Atm 1 I ,-- t • 1...c,02,4-1.04k,...e•l'o c- t • •,1 6 1 PLANT LIST 9 1 • . . k e-w... 6...A.,--- tacT,..mr.at.rerla urv•-•-o..r•See a,iU --Pe ,,,C4-41 GO,V-esto 01 1 ;-- f C.-1c,.. 2....A1,4 cz, i 1 1...000-rxos 1-,....ei.ef.• -1,-4, -g ft L-25.'e te 2.ctx., we.....644`04:37 1.101 I . • •I O‘t......4,-4e."..,G*PrO,S 4 ot, 66 41 - 0 "0 q,....+R.•••.A.I. r7"1.1.4‘.4 irg 11 17.-W..t.401r- COG 04 -orkerl e0.•kreff-kW OM-Mice,' OG,t•ko414 it c,,,,,.eco 0 tv, ....6.0"•.....4*rf.-.R.M., n51.41.....,-, .1.- c.c. It1gm, co-Divlxv c.u..••••-0 (mum, c'araf- 7•• Alt t... ilk ( t at • , 14,4110731,PRON-u-r .MK.G ef:10.C. tf. 4.4,- or -4,--wk-1,2;4.4It,111, .,-,)- .111.4,:v-4-' 4/3 c,c,.....,.."TANATA 10,4k,rx.w....e s'-z,' 2.co- ,oc. Ck* 411 1:• .'''' •••S',.ft v& r.,Or.,',..lesa",-44.,•',. ii.1:".< .:_-_-;:÷.- L ...,, 4111., iiii_i2.41,-.4410,44rkcirr ..I!! ;I" -.7'., ''''' "ler -, , It1,71,:d,•2W.- #•.--._ - ---tr - :".-----2:0 leo c,--ev.A. ...max..ixtv,t.m.r' •-•a0.....e..--owe e-e- t.o., ,at, Sp./ 72' 57As.e7 wr.Tex --•At7:1.4../ii c :1, W. .4n.F.•...k to' e.p-L LvItaq .:.--G...v.7c.c., a.....ce...N SHEET 1 yi N.,.. ., OF R.e A 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 miLL o BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9A co. FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0, 9gT D SEPTE 9? February 17, 1981 Mr. Kevin Henderson 216 First Avenue S. , Suite 350 Seattle, WA 98104 RE: File No. SA-126-80; Seventh Avenue Corporation Site Approval . Dear Mr. Henderson: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of January 30, 1981 , has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sincerely, T sic Fred J. Ka fman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 30th day of January 19 81 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this '30 - day of 1:-.Sc1ouac-/ 19 . kCdA Notary Public in and for the Stage of Washington, residing at pi1 Application, Petition or Case: Seventh Avenue Corporation; SA-126-80 • The. minute's contain a. tilt o the paitti u o necand. 1 a January 30, 1981 J OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON I REPORT AND DECISION . APPLICANT: ' Seventh Avenue Corporation FILE NO. SA-126-80 LOCATION: . Vicinity of 650 S.W. 7th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site plan approval for a proposed five-story, +88,000 square foot office building with associated parking for AO vehicles. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on January 21 , 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on January 27, 1981 at 10: 15 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report , and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit#2: Site Plan as submitted Exhibit #3: Landscaping Plan Also entered for illustrative purposes was a composite of landscaping and site plan. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Kevin Henderson 216 First Avenue S. , Suite 350 Seattle, WA 98104 Mr. Henderson indicated that the Planning Department report had been reviewed, and the sole concern regards payment of the traffic improvement assessment since legislation has not been formally adopted or approved by the city. He proposed that a bond be posted in lieu of the payment when a building permit is requested. Mr. Blaylock advised that the assessment' had been required as a mitigating measure of the environmental determination and would be required prior to issuance of a building permit. Mr. Henderson indicated his concurrence in the requirement. The Examiner requested further comments in support. Responding was: Gary Moore Calvin Jordan & Associates 15049 N.E. Bel-Red Road Bellevue, WA 98007 Mr. Moore presented a series of slides depicting the subject site, the surrounding area, and the proposal . Responding to the Examiner' s inquiry regarding access across the existing railroad tracks, Mr. Moore advised that because grades are relatively level , there would be no difficulty in providing a roadway across the tracks. He also indicated that the parki layout would be revised to conform with the city's ordinance provisions for compact cars in accordance with the square footage of proposed buildings. The Examiner inquired if the potential problem of reflective glass and traffic on FAI-405 and surrounding streets had been studied. Mr. Moore advised that although the matter had not been reviewed, the t SA-126-80 Page Two the unmirrored glass, which will be recessed into wall areas and protected by overhangs, would be limited, and will provide a limited amount of reflectance to keep out heat. The Examiner requested further comments in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then requested an additional period of time of 21 days in which to publish a decision regarding the matter due to upcoming vacations. There was no objection. Since no further comments were offered, the hearing regarding File No. SA-126-80 was closed by the Examiner at 10:36 a-.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a site plan for an approximately 88,000 square foot office building together with parking for 440 vehicles. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-730 (M-P; Manufacturing Park) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 8. The subject property is located in the vicinity of 650 S.W. 7th Street. The site is located between S.W. 7th and the Milwaukee Road Railroad right-of-way. The entire tract is approximately 3.91 acres. The site was annexed into the city in April of 1959 by Ordinance No. 1745. The site was rezoned to M-P by Ordinance No. 2205 in January, 1966. 9. The site is essentially level . The parcel is composed of two portions which are separated by a spur of the Milwaukee trackage. The majority of the site is south of the spur line and the office building and some parking will be located upon this parcel . The remaining portion will accommodate the remainder of the required parking. 10. Pursuant to Section 4-730.040.9, a site plan has been filed for the office building and a public hearing held. 11 . The building will be a five-story tower with covered parking on the first level . The remainder of the parking will be surrounding the building and on the northerly portion northwest of the railroad spur. The building will be finished in precast buff colored concrete with reflective bronze glass windows. The windows should not cause any glare on adjacent areas. 12. The 88,000 square foot structure will require 440 parking spaces of which up to 25% can be for compact cars. The applicant did not use this option and eight of the parking ' spaces appear to provide less than the required maneuvering space. 13. The landscaping plans indicate that more than 5% of the site parking area will be landscaped. The site is within the area guided by the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan which provides that internal landscaping should be used to soften the effect of the project as viewed from adjacent hillsides and to provide a pleasant working environment. 14. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for manufacturing types of uses. 15. The subject site is located within the flood zone control area, and a permit must be obtained from the King County Department of Hydraulics prior to the issuance of a building permit. SA-12o-00 Page Three 16. The Public Works Department has indicated that a six-foot sidewalk is required along S.W. 7th Street. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The site plans submitted for the subject proposal appear to provide a well-designed building with well-landscaped grounds and associated parking areas. The exterior treatment of the building, buff-colored, precast concrete and bronze windows, will be compatible with the existing uses and will enhance the appearance of this now vacant site. 2. The proposal will provide the necessary parking and the two portions of the parking area will be landscaped and screened to blend more effectively with the area. Providing compact parking spaces will enable the applicant to shift some of the land devoted to parking to additional landscaping to comply with both the Parking and Loading Ordinance's 5% landscaping, the 2% habitat mitigation ordinance, and with the Green River Valley objective of providing large amounts of internal landscaping. Additional landscaping will relieve the barrenness of the site as viewed from the proposed Earlington Woods residential community on the hillside north of the subject site. 3. The applicant should provide a sidewalk to tie the subject proposal to the other developments in the area and to provide the opportunity for employees to walk to the retail and food service areas a short distance to the east along Rainier Avenue. DECISION: The site plan, Exhibits #2 and 3, is approved subject to: 1 . The provision of a six-foot sidewalk along S.W. 7th Street. 2. The modification of the parking lot to provide sufficient maneuvering space for all vehicles and additional landscaping material subject to review by the city's landscape architect. ORDERED THIS 30th day of January, 1981 . Fred J. K fman Land Use H aring Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 30th day of January, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Kevin Henderson,216 First Avenue S. , Suite 350, Seattle, WA 98104 Gary Moore, Calvin Jordan & Associates, 15049 N.E. Bel-Red Road, Bellevue, WA 98007 TRANSMITTED THIS 30th day of January, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before February 13, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. 1 1 SA-l2C _J Page Four An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting Iother specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. i PLANNING DEPARTMENT1MT PRELIMINP I'y IMPORT To 'Iry HEARING EX, I r ;' PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 27 , 1981 APPLICANT: SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION FILE NUMBER: SA-126-80 A. SUMMARY & PI I *SE OP 1 4)11 I:ST: TPie applicant requests site plan approval for a proposed 5-story +88 ,000 square foot office building with associated parking Tor 440 vehicles. B. GENERAL INFORM TION: 1 . Owner of Record: SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION 2 . Applicant: SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) Vicinity of 650 S.W. 7th Street . 4 . Legal Description: A detailed legal description is. available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property: 3. 91 acres 6 . Access :Via S:W. 7th Street 7. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: M-P, B-1 , Business Use 9 , Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on January 11 , 1981 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on January 15, 1981 . C• i:i]LSII!W;Y/BASH AI weloI9 : The subject site was annexed into the City of Renton by Ordinance No. 1745 of April 14 , 1959 and rezoned to Manufacturing Park by Ordinance No. 2205 of January 1 , 1966 . D. ' I' I::YSICA :AGGRO : 11 . Topography: The site is essentially level. .. 2. Soils : Woodinville Silt Loam (Wo) . Permeability is moderately slow. There is a seasonal high water table at or near the surface. The available water capacity is high. ' Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. Stream overflow is a severe hazard unless flood protection is provided. The soil is used for row crops , pasture, and urban development. a PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION, SA-126-80 JANUARY 27 , 1981 PAGE TWO 3 . Vegetation: Existing vegetation consists principally of scrub grass and blackberry bushes. 4 . Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals. . 5. Water: No surface water was observed on the subject - site (January 15, 1981 ) . 6 . Land Use: The subject site is undeveloped with a golf course on the west and a railroad spur on the west and north. To the east is an office-storage structure and properties to the south as principally warehousing enterprises. E. h te I:ui 4 r' tOOD CHARACT7 I STIICS: The surrounding properties are developing into manufacturing park and office type uses. F. ' ]PII I:>LIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: A 12" water main extends East-West on S.W 7th Street adjacent, to the subject site while 8" sanitary sewers are located an S.W 7th Street and north-south on Thomas Avenue S.W. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton Fire Department as per Ordinance Requirements. 3 . Transit: Metro Transit Route #155 operates along Lind Avenue S.W. within 1/4 mile to the east of the subject site. 4 . Schools : Not Applicable 5. 1 Recreation: Not Applicable G. '\ "IPLICCABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . , Section 4-730 , Manufacturing park H. !a "]PIf„gi p, :;i.F SECTIONSS OF THE Ctri qi i t:moSivig 1PLAR`I OR orimER OFFICIAL CICT DOCUMENT: 1 . Comprehensive Plan, Land USe Report, 1965 , Objective 6, Page 18 . I. IMPACTI OP THE NATURAL Of; r ig H;\N Fig e'T 1 . Natural Systems : Development will remove the vegetation disturb the soils, increase storm water runoff, increase traffic and noise levels in the area. Through proper development controls and procedures, however these impacts can be mitigated. 2 . Population/Employment: Construction and completion of the structure will provide increased employment opportunities for the area. residents. r/ - PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION, SA-126-80 JANUARY 27 , 1981 PAGE THREE 3 . Schools : Not Applicable 4 . Social: Completion of the proposed structure would provide increased opportunities for social interaction among the building' s employees. 5. Traffic : The proposed project would result in an increase of 1030 additional vehicle trips per day or a 14 percent increase over present levels on S.W. 7th Street. . J. ENVIRONMENTALThL ASSESS T/THRES OLD DE` 1 RMI iJA'g®1 I: Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C, the Environmental Review' Committee on December 31 , 1980 issued a Final Declaration of Non-Significance for the proposal subject to the mitigation of traffic impacts by payment of approximately 15 percent of the cost of signalization of the intersection of S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. for which the $20 , 574 calculated for traffic impacts is appropriate. K. GENCIES/DEP ms r TS (CONT CTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division. 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposal is consistent with the M-P zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park for the subject site. Planned is an 88 ,000 square foot four-story office over parking (for 440 vehicles) . 2 . Parking required for the proposed structure is one space/200 square feet or 440 spaces. The site plan as submitted provides the stalls. However, as noted by staff comment, approximately eight spaces are doubtful as to meeting the ordinance standards for maneuverability. Redesign of the parking layout through the use of compact stalls 8 feet by 16 feet - up to 25% of total is permitted) should rectify this . 3 . The proposed structure meets the setback requirements of the M-P zone and the required 10-foot landscape strip along S.W. 7th Street. 4 . The proposed landscaping includes 13 ,486 square feet of parking area landscaping. The Parking and Loading Ordinance requires that 5% (7 ,443 square feet) of the paved area be landscaped, and Resolution 1923 requires that 2% (3398 square feet) of the total site be landscaped for wildlife habitat preserva- tion. w1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PREL*NARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC, HEARING: SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION, SA-126-80 JANUARY 27 , 1981 PAGE FOUR In addition, the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan sets forth under site objectives : LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE - 0 Large amounts of landscaping scattered throughout the site including along property lines are encouraged to provide a pleasant environment, minimize the impact of the development and enhance the visual experience from the adjacent properties, including hillsides. Based upon these objectives, the proposed project should provide a landscaped separation from the railroad spur and provide adequate landscaping to provide visual enhancement to the building and grounds from the Earlington Woods residential develop- ment on the hill to the north. This should consist of a five foot wide strip composed of a suitable combination of ground cover and shrubs to supplement the Lombardy Poplars planned adjacent to the south and east. (This would be similar to that required as part of the Central Puget, Inc. Site Approval SA-324-79) on the same site. ) The parking stalls involved in this area could be converted to compacts and the adjustment would then conform to the Parking and Loading Ordinance standards. Additional trees should also be planted along the northwesterly border of the site to supplement the Moonlight Broom proposed per the policy noted herein. 5. Proposed exterior building treatment of buff-colored pre-cast concrete with refle6ted bronze insulated glass is consistent with other buildings in the I vicinity and compatible with the M-P zone and Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan requirements. 6 .' A six foot sidewalk is to be installed along S.W. 7th Street as noted by the Engineering Division. 7 . Driveway entrances proposed for the subject site must be widened to 30 feet as indicated by the Traffic Engineering Division. The assessment for future transportation improvements totals $20,574 and is to be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. This fee is to be the applicant ' s share of a partial payment for the total cost of a traffic signal to be installed at the intersection of S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. 8. The Fire Department advises that a pre-construction conference with the Fire Marshall will be required and that the entire structure shall be fully sprink- lered. 9 . If fire protection mains are required, utility plans will also need approval. The Utilities Engineering Division also states that standard hook-up fees will apply. 10. A Flood Zone Control Permit is required for the proposed project. e PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION, SA-126-80 JANUARY 27 , 1981 PAGE FIVE M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the above analysis , recommend approval of the request subject to the following conditions : 1 ) Revision of the parking layout through the use of compact stalls in order to meet the maneuverability requirements for the eight stalls addressed per Analysis , item 2 (L. 2) . 2 . Revision of the landscape plan to include the separation from the railroad spur and additional trees as outlined in Analysis , item 4 (L. 4) . 3 . Installation of the sidewalk as per Analysis , item 6 (L. 6) . 4 ) Payment of a portion of the traffic signal improve- ment per Traffic Engineering comments (L. 7) . 1 s -tea- •.., o q r1rVq,p,.UNSET BLVP Y Q, . .=5 OP fY jot ,.', c ,''h. • sir, ,.. -, e • 1`.` r C IS " ir o -. 1 ,,,,ag 4.. ..1 l': y9 • ,3 II al r.W %; 2ti, la' L-61 1,6 I 1 s® k IZJ I w I 1" ... 1 t f' i I lI o 1' _ f, in ' t - 1 mflfl dlliram,# l 111011FrrInplu G 1 RN i IIIIIIII pllllil ' n w\ 0, s S., Ohl Ice 1134Ah . h itIii 111 ® I b:.• _ 1 "` III{{I q`I 1 iIIII lr I I1 IINIIIIN pi., 1 w ' id' I p I IIUI . 4,. yam_ A I Y' 4 _ W k T T S. Y41 .. r u.ao. . Y S `, •I. !•*. 40S 4 ilk y r ` \ il Aty I Il) 3 4- 4 . I 1, M° N...... Y;- III i n ilf,v T ' 't-- r.L \\ P t. _ '. ' 1i6. h. , Jan S __ 0. „y f • !,F• is - } I ._ _I Q `•icr.'-\Q` 6 a C Dn-1 TIOh CLAMrlindt Fk r r 4 " yr TS...--,..: .... SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION i' SITE APPROVAL IN THE MP ZONE SA-126-80 APPLICANT THE SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION TOTAL AREA +3. 91 acres PRINCIPAL' ACCESS S.W. 7th Street M-P, ManufacturingParkEXISTINGZONING EXISTING USE VACANT PROPOSED USE Office Building COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park ii COMMENTS i I It i 1 SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION SA-126-80 os-0nnw ItaLara!da d C-QR•'.0'C•'h'S Fi'aL.t-qq pp th•P Mom: .'es r•.L I t- Y WI: P m 4'..4+• •uJ-tdleticL 0 Rife a' . z9 c 0!Oh YJ4uC 3 406 7. ,,. Z w 4. e 0./ ti\ tVt.err w"K{lorw• 1 TTi 1ds~ d ryps ry o-•lJO.L.U•cG c eCG P!rh v Yt•' r.r 5.rO a crc 0, I U wan v-4,1":04—,._.... aG+WIOD W+1:,i'6 eOG. I I row:rap act' UII_. • I I IRyl t .Y.,,1.Ke-'s vac. a? -ora ., 5a. , / / r Q24t,v reWoar 0 5L - taG, I 1 SI:-ca a5a.r r s r++tcow I" ' a rD L 1. o•aa.u++v a ao oc Lp i 1%5 1• \v y+y. - . ' MyI 6 0o..:.-0 .N s .. aibIt10, DECIDUOUS TREE 0 ul is •. 1 Y .'jllw• 0-7..r-.TPG4:X ra{{tNYCda, 5-P.aFU-5,4,.-DdrJ16.eaLte Z > YY Vw 1 a-p....-ea.6'1v Jt'FCi'E'.'aLeiT L-'X.J b.W•tD¢'D71e Fe OL. Q G y L-_.P.ta L-;L...-.-.',• oL C C gin'. 'GL ,: V.,- r / 7-(d- `ryL}Iz eLPL rear P'rva u e dm.Y T . r cc Z - y's 0 I I IlhJ•0'O.1.0%$1'1 E.•j OL A(ICCS VyFC T tPPYII -0 e eraw a s _ v.Ln rraar,-ors. o.....,K 4 Z s i y,. IOj fi: 2. PLUM.. .• uw :.:.c:, luto°., o. e X awyx G;/ . AlillW ` T cLF 7 a I -efQ%' JJ Lc4OL. . . T.L..4.YJr..DZ.rno.. nu rr.wu i 7m f"' , L.y: jT}ay ,.t'TFOm I iv'-%:!^.V.Jl+ 04,E w.mr,s"•*•ec I=TOyTOL usr.c- R'.• rl0•M r C • r..c r SHRUE CONIFEROUS TREE . 0, -vn w,cn. coveredbaaaaaton. ,.n> IV S?,w V CICALA I — u-ari'e•i<'Lf+iks,,C4'co. r _ I I ,.,. n..,.e,<•i,i,.,...... e t I _ . . I PLANT LIST i 1i - -- ru, aa,^- .mrrn.I,PTG cv-a•.,q.ZE „Ot r3°L.H :o --: I 9 s0'-1 i-.+..51r1 aRr = .[..-•. L2t'0 LO 17L GL W5....154,C.-E0 ler._ a; c w..,,y •'r-,,.ic, ,.oneu- rcr..o. 0•:= ee, I V Lc 3! It A 9k Yi•'.rif J.Ra O`D.11KG 62 O.L nl L P-..Y-RC`!;,(O .^.-As-v h%YL i2-ar 'l.6•dR*Ct eY,, I aW1 Stl. 6'A"W l0'AYrLT.o L.,f'•0 FL ItD L ..2:ai.Ly'b+L .. GQ.(a.JOJ t 3'L r es a L at W• G. i •` 1 ' S-.R000',T.o,-+r!I'b.L 6 aOGL 0/,-/ I 4 tiUJ c8 rate.,-Ef+v.;P eF LA,cv.Yf e'-2' Z/0. .U 0 3 W. __Whir/a- i e..i. - 0/X/ _-: _ - - -.------ Ie. :L•,y w • ,.t-- X•..4.-ecc.- a .-w- ,u, 1' - 7m `1fAEa7 — - —wr.-_ctE_ _-s°`r _LAIN am •w io nE...MG..- o'- cc eta. ^_.e' I2u ' cc r SHEET 7'!F I SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION SA — 126 — 80 vt I a 3 l sa.. 1. .a a Lea•vEy- 1 1'' T - —s. ea,maces wm .»a4 Sr.oa Tm4 y o roe s 1 i'r ice-__: I l' dy SECTION y 0 4, er4 i 1EIT nao eoo00Gel^7 G1i5149wao ec4°.x1I1 9 d ,no 0 0 0 0 o r 1 I u/ Mil 11 . 7 0 0 0 o J y— r i — 1, V__,_ . _ arl I I>4 rli r `ir /, Gil Zip- I o 0 0 9 1 1 ` I% a A I I II f o. l j r_ i, p. _ ELEVATION 1 5 FLOOR PLAN.- 0__—_. _ S-- fIH. 1i T_ yy @ rTjTAR.m.ea.o ' ' SiTE, a S+';, tl ®I 'a'15! A..Ti•11gaiEC( FZ2i1 ego. SITE PLAN 650 S.W. 7Th ST RENTON,WASHINGTON S. W. TTH ST, T— o laitOu.so..o...oa........o..o„io.o«o h__ ___, u.,.u.. iiENTON CALVIN JOAOAM 0 A@a OCIAYRO 1 I` I Yr e*o... tUyM Fens_.., ec•s_ c.oscoaE rrc ,x._—_—u:c.o....a.c..... `' uw E Z y u.9 .aCOr,n ELLE.uE • _ SFYICJ.1` a— _--- VICINITY MAP K 1 I i ' d(3)7A) Planning RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 1a'A4 r G'6D 0 eApplication :C5'4. ® f f+®_; `•` Agli ' j©P ,<pckc* re Cido.,gt A crlieery4rit• dire' `ig Location : •} )) J7 °r a Applicant: TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED NEARING DATE : :; /: 1 Police Department ARC MEETING DATE : diVir4:1 :::49 Public Works Department E.Ro o Q8 Q e; ®.% /' N •** Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division tilities Engineering Fire Department Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT G FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPA TMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO AITEND THE ARC, PLEASE P OVIELTHE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:Ou P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :7,,e/ Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 4/1-es/ t' i --- /9/5-Y ori=-ramti, S/ 1-Lt r-z-,i z c 79/'-P/, /,L'A z-L1 C'o aL, /moo Oz-vx ,4-ivc.2`-S, 7;,4,` a-r/GQ,//e— S`/( _6: 7 124 1__ -- 5 r'J';I A)/---17-' \. z___, • J Si ature of (rector9orAuthoizeRepresentatveDate REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : WO L/rY (CI( Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Ofrcrck-k. ut-u4.TD.04,..1._4.p.v. Signature f Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE DEPT . Approved Approved with Conditions XXXXNot Approved 1) Prior to construction of this building a traffic light should be installed at the intersection of SW. 7th & Hardie S .W. . The additional traffic generated by this building can not be handled by the existing roadway without improvement. 2) The impact this building would have on police services due to call for traffic enforcement & investigation without improving S .W. 7th woulle low our overall response throughout the city. Lt . 12/9/80 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 3 ( Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 7 Signatur rector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved X Approved with Conditions Not Approved ie 71-7 14A---‘2--k) pv-0 vl'ci/e- /..-e.sa, z Z/ ' s :e,r s 774- S7e: Signature of Director or Aut rized Repre en ative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Date Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT /nTVISION : TRAFFIC ENGINES DIVISION Approved I Approved with Conditions Not Approved See attached memo. WI? a4/-4. - 2(4 Gr-c i-a,fr; c Q/4c.,:a 3a/V,74,gq/•'c / ys- 2I 12/9/80 Signature of Director or Authorized Representati Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date F SUBJECT : The 650 Building -- Site Approval (SA-126-80) Assessment for future transportation improvements required to accommodate newdevelopmentsis $20.00 per average daily trip generation by the development.Trip generations are determined from ITE Standards. Assessment amount wouldbea's follows: No;. of 1 ,000 Average Sq. Ft. x Trip Rate x Assessment Value = Total Assessment 88 x 11 .69 x $20 = $20,574.40 Please advise the developer of amount of assessment to be paid as a conditionpriortoactualbuilding. 1 CEM:ad I FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No: SA-126-80 Environmental Checklist No : ECF-636-80 Description of Proposal: Application for site approval for proposed 5-story 188 , 000 sq. ft. office building, with parking for 440 vehicles Proponent: SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION Location of Proposal : 650 S.W. 7th Street Lead Agency: PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on December. 24 , 1980 following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department. There were no oral comments. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-636-80 are the following : 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson, Assistant Planner; DATED: December 8, 1980 2) Application: SA-126-80 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning, Building, Engineering and Fire Departments. Police Department recommended declaration of significance. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this develop- ment doe's not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1. Mitigation of traffic impacts by payment of approximately 15% of the cost of signalization of the intersection of S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. for which the $20, 574 calculated for . traffic impacts is appropriate. Signatures: I onald G. Nelson, Building Gordon Y. Ericks'gn,` Planning Director j Director 11 tv Warren G. Gonnason, Director Public Works Department Published: December 31, 1980 Appeal Period Expires: January 14, 1981 1 r141 1., e}a k. M1r ri 4, Y P i •f t,•r FY ^ yyy .. t` s.X l•\ea P l it t J^ x,i lit "d1 x i: w, k*e' w r, r''' i#t `r. •i i ' i'k gyp. 4r k, ¢h i r;• GENERAL 'LOCATION: ANDs OR{[q ADDRES S: PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF 650 S.W. 7TH STREET LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT I I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PR • PERTY OWNERS OF fv A.RINGr TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON JANUARY 27 , 1981 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNG ITEM g° REZ • E 1 SP . CI PERMIT SIT , ' -A' PPR • VAL BUOILDINGCINONANOFM-PIZONETORYWITHOFFICE PARKING FOR 440 VEHICLES Lii WAIVER Li SHO JN :: fr N MENT PERMIT FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE r "XPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: JANUARY 14 , 1981 FOR FURTHER INFORMATte CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT OPER AUTHORIZATION 2 r d - l-2‘-",=1 OF I THE CITY OF RENTONU h Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 eta ;„ '; BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR e PLANNING DEPARTMENT o9A0 a 235- 2550 91T6"0 SEPIEl* January 9, 1981 Seventh Avenue Corporation 216 First Avenue South #350 Seattle, Washington 98104 Re: APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL, file SA-126-80, to allow construction of five-story office building in the M-P zone with parking for 440 vehicles ; property located in the vicinity of .650 S.W. 7th Street Gentlemen: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on December 31 , 1980. A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for January 27, 1981 at 9 :00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Ro e B,laylo Associate Planner cc : Calvin Jordan & Assoc. 15049 Bel/Red Road Bellevue, WA 98007 i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING l, REN` LAND USE HEARING EXAMINE RENTON, WASHINGTONt A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 27 , 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . SOUTH COUNTY RADIO Application for conditional use permit to locate two radio broadcasting towers (150 feet tall) and small transmitter building for a new radio station, File CU-115-80; property located on the northeast corner of S.E. 44th Street and 103rd Avenue S.E. extended) . 2. SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION ("THE 650 BUILDING") rt Application for site approval, File SA-126-80, to allow construction of five-story (approximate 88 ,000 sq. ft. ) office building in the M-P zone with parking for 440 vehicles ; property located in the vicinity of 650 S.W. 7th Street. 3 . LAZZETTI/MALESIS (STONEBRIDGE COMPANY) Application for rezone from G to R-2 , file R-127-80, to allow use as multi-family residential apartment complex; the approximate 3. 16 acre parcel is located east of Kirkland Avenue N.E. at N.E. 16th Street. 4 . LEROY A. BOWEN Applications for three-lot short plat approval, file 138-80; and request for waiver of off- site improvements, file W-002-81 ; property located on the north side of S.W. Grady Way between Thomas Avenue S.W. and Lind Avenue S.W. Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton; Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 27, 1981 , AT 9 :00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED January 11 , 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE; PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 9th day of January, 1981 . SIGNED: „ t + ems Steve Munson Assistant Planner V CALVIN JORDAN ASSOCIATES 15049 NORTHEAST BELLEVUE/REDMOND RD. 0 BELLEVUE,WASH. 0 98007 (206) 643-3123 December 19 ,1980 N N `' " 1., 1/.\ ' ,i- City of Renton a `' `' in," Planning Department k4?0 20'0 Mill Avenue South f ;' Renton, WA 98055 i, Attn: Roger Blaylock J -'. Ref: Site Approval Application for 650" Building, Renton, WA Dear Mr. Blaylock, You apparently misunderstood me in our telephone conversation of December 17th, and withheld review of the above referenced project by the Environmental Review Committee in anticipation of further input. We had originally discussed, on December 15th, the need for our client to submit a letter to the Committee expressing his willingness to participate in the cost of signalization for S.W. 7th and Edwards which could be required as a result of this project and others proposed for the area. In a subsequent telephone conversation with Mr. Gary Norris of the City' s Traffic Engineering Department, it was determined that the City' s Development Assessment Fee, anticipated to be about $20 ,500 , would be used to offset this project' s share of the signalization costs. It was therefore decided that a letter was unnecessary. Since this has been the second postponement, we would appreciate the earliest possible review of our application by the Committee. Very truly yours, CALVIN JORDAN & ASSOCIATES 1 N(l Garry D. Moore Principal Architect cc: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineering I I ARCWITGrTIIQ n I AKincrAor AD -1ITcrTIID I-I DI AKIPIIKI(_ n rnNSTRIICTIC N MANAGEMENT Date circulated : i V S1 e Comments due : l07/7/96 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 6 3 - f3,0 APPLICATION No (s ) . PROPONENT : .6 'v ia 0 r PROJECT TITLE : (Q S® ud i® Brief Description of Project : pt,, 57" ,Sp ifi,dtreient// z ne fir r e P S ®r t g 6004 ce j !v arke leeryleft91/ dos LOCATION : ..S-O .1 7J 3 SITE AREA : 9/ezep's BUILDING AREA (gross)2 2 aZ "it DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : P°' ' 97 1 c jfd. cao-n IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE/ INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : v 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) ' Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north : east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 1/ 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : r 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : A n 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : v/ COMMENTS : Recommendation : NSI ` DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : jr, Title : n °u • Date : 1 - FORM: ERC-06 Date, circulated : /0Z/S/ ®Comments due : /2/ / o ENJ" 1RDNHENT L (CWIEENLIST R[V/IEI SHEET ECF 634 e) APPLICATION No (s ) , PROPONENT : v 0 PROJECT TITLE : 6C CSO oa A eE Q Brief Description of Project : / 61Mt eine LOCATION : .S 0 ,56eie 7 SITEi AREA : t3. 901ezetx05. BUILDING AREA (gross)s -ge9 ae In o rp 8. g 7`T a dDEVELOPMENTALCOVERAGE (%) : — t., bl . IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) ( Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : v 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north : east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) : Risk of upset : 4/ 5 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) , Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy :c/ 16) ,Utilities : r/ 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : v 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recomimendation : DNSI DOS More Information Revieiwed by : Gam— Title : Date e FORM: ERC-06 lekl._Date circulated : /O/SEV62 Comments due : E2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST RE@ITEt SHEET ECF - 63,6 - 3/ APPLICATION No (s ) . f7 - go PROPONENT : Ve-va' i Cor.p • PROJECT TITLE : " 7t2 CS® 8c.fPhr•o Brief Description of Project : r r s d Slory gg 060 ie e v a SITE AREA : -- , Cnezc( 'efl BUILDING AREA (gross)t ate n DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : ck3t,ei„.„g&„Ibloc. a petc- IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 1 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : V 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare :_ 8) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) ' Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13) Trip ends CITE) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 141 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : JT 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : I D S More Information Reviewed by : Title : j i //jl d/ Date :G/ 3 FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : r01/S/ge Comments due : /07/7/c'O ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF 030 APPLICATION No (s ) , PROPONENT : v..411`i Coo PROJECT TITLE : " e CSO. u Brief Description of Project : Vet g pr tfaroeb d , Slor ggr Ov0 f[ce bvi ark"trts> orsi ogee /do, LOCATION : O 6er 7 SITE AREA :1, ,A o±o5 BUILDING AREA (gross )r' S_261ff!j17 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : • Sitv- 4 wifepp°a' ' g7gq It ' s of• pa P IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) , Direct/Indirect air quality :111111111/11/1111111111 3) Water &• water courses : 11111111111WATIMIN 4) Plant life : 11111!!!!!!!!5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 11111111111:1111,- 7) Light & glare : 8) . Land Use ; north: R e chs4 east : exiito4 '4 E" I I-1ICI' s+M.r oc 5 t ej) south: AlO(o.dt/? Grp west :ol ,uje 1 Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 1do?, l goc. 9) Natural resources: fo 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ), Population/Employment : 12 ). Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends CITE) : s eta. V traffic impacts :_jtnpdvacveasein'rl ecoeiS. 1 14) Public services : 15 )' Energy : 16 ) Utilities: 17 ), Human health : 18Y Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI (/ DOS More Information Reviewed by : Sere_ fll .rnsOP3 Title : 7455/. vitPiaPIAPs-- Date : 8/86 FORM: ERC-06 Sob f sedtS ar EA C -t114GSDI j i` s C-s-. Se .5//Tlf (,.a/' n,•7`'galI el r// Date circulated : /r2P3/ge9 Comments due : o ENVIRONMENTAL C ECiCLI T REVIIEU SHEET ECF 6 36 _eao APPLICATION No (s ) . PROPONENT : efc fi 0r Y PROJECT TITLE : (c CSO udeffe®3 D' Brief Description of Project : fr eeos 4/'//4Y{[ Ar a v` o J - s 71or gi? Ad® ce arici tort 01/e"ftoeirs LOCATION : .5-0 SITE AREA :9,,acA95; BUILDING AREA (gross)i ao -01), 4-( eppDEVELOPMENTALCOVERAGE (%) : --w n4e,,.o.4, 4 i Pe IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : x' 5 ) . Animal life : A 6) . Noise : 7) ,Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : y e 9) Natural resources : 10 ) 'Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15 ) Energy : vf' 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : x 18) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : NSI_ DOS More Information Reviewed by : Date : Z FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : /pZlZ/ e)Comments due : cs `7 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST(LIST REVIEU SHEET ECF - ;; 6 _ i APPLICATION No (s ) . 6— g® PROPONENT : V Corp . PROJECT TITLE : (es,7Xe CSO u n r® 4a AOBriefDescriptionofProject :i-e-S s 4/9rdae l it? 1 Zane r exeropeo•W'et..6:15107 gi,®®® filc h' 16 441#a?I"k-t lflo ' i‘e01/74?4,,g LOCATION : .5-0 SITE AREA : .14- . , ezere5.BUILDING AREA (gross) e& ®A I(tppr x, Q 7 cJct 11--/- DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : -- CUV fa. pQo-ki IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 58 X /62 =7- r, A' traffic impacts : --5,;fi r it"./-'?_/ (9s e/e'PG-4(`-tdc.°1, 1. 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : 16 ) . Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : v 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI y DOS More Information Reviewed by : `it1e : %!i' e/<<S Date : FORM: ERC-06 y Date circulated : joz/z/ ® Comments due : /c2/'7/ e ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST RE7IEN SHEET 1. ECF - 636 - E... r APPLICATION No (s ) o -6 --&76- gO PROPONENT : gsa` Corit3 . r ..a 7® PROJECT TITLE : c il B•f3 Brief. Description of Project : Pemp-e-deli\ rdtee iti- 4e r 6, r0pel5()e, C. 3 or gg offh ce ha 14 ark la 0Yeflida,S LOCATION : .co ,5 SITE AREA : -1-- 3, 9/gcpe5, BUILDING AREA (gross ) 966 ;n DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : -- eut,VI(A, r pia t.dea IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) ;Topographic changes : 2 ) !Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) 'Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) ; Natural resources : 10 ) ; Risk of upset : 11 ) , Population/Employment : 12 ) ' Number of Dwellings : 13 ) ' Trip ends (ITE) : xxxx traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 1 xxxx 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) ' Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 4 1. 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS :This area can not take the additional burden of a five story building and a 440 car parking area . The impact on So 7th and HardieSW would be m to severe. At present we are hamat having an unusal amount of traffic congestion & traffic accidents in the area. This complex should not be allowed to be built or start building until the intersection of So. 7th Hardie is laxilal rebuilt & signalized. We do not have enough police officers to contend with the traffic & other problems related with this building. Recommendation : NSI-_ DOS xxxx More Information PI I ersso Reviewed by : n Title : Lieutenant Date :12/9/80 FORM:' ERC-06 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No: SA-126-80 Environmental Checklist No : ECF-636-80 Description of Proposal : Application for site approval for proposed 5-story ±88, 000 sq. ft. office building, with parking for 440 vehicles Proponent:SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION Location of Proposal: 650 S.W. 7th Street Lead Agency: PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on December 24 , 1980 following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department. There were no oral comments. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-636-80 are the following : 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson, Assistant Planner; DATED: December 8, 1980 2) Application: SA-126-80 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning, Building, Engineering and Fire Departments. Police Department recommended declaration of significance. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this develop- ment does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1. Mitigation of traffic impacts by payment of approximately 15% of the cost of signalization of the intersection of S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. for which the $20, 574 calculated for traffic impacts is appropriate. Signatures: 72 FA Ronald G. Nelson, Building cordon Y. Erick en, Planning Director Director Warren G: Gonnason, Director Public Works Department Published: December 31, 1980 Appeal Period Expires: January 14 , 1981 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL RLVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following project: 1. SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION (THE "650" BUILDING) ECF-636-80) Application for site approval for proposed 5-story ±88 , 000 sq. ft. office building in the M-P Zone, with parking for 440 vehicles; File No. SA-126-80; property located 650 S.W. 7th Street Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Mitigation of traffic impacts by payment of approximately 15% of the cost of signalization of the intersection of S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. for which the $20, 574 calculated for traffic impacts is appropriate. Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550 . Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by January 14 , 1981 . Published: December 31, 1980 I AL REVIEW CO IIThH AGENDA DECEMBER 10, 1980 COMMENCING AT 10 : 00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING ITEMS : VALLEY OFFICE PARK, PARK II (ECF-602-80, SA-092-80) MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO. (ECF-567-80, SP-047-80) JAMES BANKER (ECF-623-80, SP-111-80) OLD BUSINESS: 1. PUGET STRUCTURES CORPORATION (ECF-631-80, B-241) Sea Galley Restaurant) 2 . RENTON SHOPPING CENTER (ECF-632-80, B-242) Home Energy Distributor Building) 3 . L. I.D. #314 , DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (ECF-633-80) Roadway improvements -- East Valley Highway, S.W. 16th Street, S.W. 19th Street and S.W. 27th Street. 4. STIRSKEY HOLDINGS LTD. (ECF-635-80, B-243) Harrington Place Condominiums) NEW BUSINESS: ECF-625-80 UNION AVENUE ANNEXATION Proposal to annex f28 . 5 acre area into the City of Renton; property located east side of Union Avenue NE between N.E. 4th Street and Heather Downs Plat and easterly to approx. 136th Avenue SE R-120-80 HAROLD SYRSTAD/MARY MOORE ECF-628-80 Application for rezone from SR-1 to R-2 to permit future construction of multiple family dwellings; property located vicinity of 1506 Puget Drive S.E. SA-126-80 SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION ("The 650 ECF-636-80 Building" ) Application for site approval for proposed 5-story ±88 , 000 sq. ft. office building in the M-P zone, with parking for 440 vehicles; property located 650 S.W. 7th Street CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION r 1l SITE APPROVAL fit Qv 2.4 1930 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY File No . SA- /.?6- PC) Filing Date $ Q „-Application Fee $ J Receipt No ./ (n/ Environmental Review Fee $ y0 . c<' APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name Seventh Avenue Corporation Phone (206) 292-9090 Address 216 First Avenue South #350 Seattle, WA 98104 2 . Property location 650 SW 7th Street Renton, WA 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) Attached 4 . Number', of acres or square feet 3 . 91 Acres Present zoning M-P 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? An 88 , 000 S .F. , five-story office building. 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan . . . . 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on. adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept . Rev, 1-77 Page 1 of 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS TAX LOT 9036 Portion of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 Sec. 18, T23N, R5E, W.M. King County, Washington lying Southerly of P .C. R.R. R/W and lying Northwesterly of P.C. R.R. R/W, said portion thereof lying North of a line 650ft. North of South line of said Section. Less P:C. R.R. R/W TAX LOT 9270 That portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 18 , T23N, R5E, W.M. , in Renton; King County, Washington, described as follows : Commencing at the SW corner of said Section 18 , . thence S89° 10 ' 18"E along the South line of said Section 18 a dis- tance of 275 . 74ft. to the Southerly projection of the West line of a parcel deeded to Geo. A. Hormel & Company by deed recorded under King County Auditor' s file No. 7305240389 ; thence N 0°49 ' 42"E along said Southerly projection 40 . 00ft. to the Southwest corner of said parcel and the true point of beginning, said point being on the North margin of S .W. 7th St. ; thence continuing N 0°49 ' 42"E along the West line of said parcel 464 . 54ft. to a point on a 363. 06 foot radius curve con- cave to the Southeast, a radial at said point bearing S 15° 37 ' 21"E; thence Southwesterly along said curve an arc distance of 430 . 46ft. ; Page 2 of 2 thence S 01° 14 ' 35"W 151. 88ft. to said North margin of S .W. 7th St. ; thence S 89° 10 ' 18"E along said North margin 259 . 60ft. to the true point of beginning. PORTION OF TAX LOT 9254 That portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 18 , T23N, R5E, W.M. , in Renton, King County, Washington, described as follows : Commencing at the SW corner of said Section 18 , thence 089° 10 ' 18"E along the South line of said Section 18 a dis- tance of 275 . 74ft. to the Southerly projection of the West line of a parcel deeded to Geo. A. Hormel & Company by deed recorded under King County Auditor' s file No. 7305240389 : thence N 0°49 ' 42"E along said Southerly projection 4.0 . 00 ft. to the Southwest corner of said parcel, said point being on the North margin of S.W. 7th St. ; thence continuing N 0°49 ' 42"E along the West line of said parcel 391. 75ft. to the true point of beginning; thence continuing N 0° 49 ' 42" E along the West line of said parcel 72 . 79ft. to a point on a 363. 06ft. radius curve concave to the South, a radial at said point bearing S15" 37 ' 21"E; thence Easterly along said curve an arc distance of 201. 19ft. ; thence S72° 56 ' 23"E a distance of 125 . 86ft. , thence S66° 07 ' 03"E a distance of 101. 16ft. ; thence N 89° 10 ' 10"W a distance of 406 . 54ft. to the true point beginning. 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CO- y'.. e,( c(li c '3 in FOR OFFICEI USE ONLY ' s cs 0 Application No. i--/Z6- 80 gip % 0 Environmental Checklist No. EE.c.F— 634,-53,0 PROPOSED, date: _ FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state land local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal its such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presentlylavailable to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to , your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Seventh Avenue Corporation 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 216 First Avenue South #350 Seattle, WA 98104 206) 292-9090 3. Date Checklist submitted November 24, 1980 4 Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton, Washington 5 Name of proposal , if applicable: The ' 6:50 ' Building 6 Nature. and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : The proposal is for a five-story, 88 , 000 S.F. office building with a landscaped parking lot for 440 cars. The ground floor will contain parking with the remaining four floors being office i space. The building will be a steel frame structure with buff colored pre-cast concrete panels and bronze reflective glass. 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an, accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : See Attachment I (7) I. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Fall 1981 9. LJist of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : Site Approval, Building Permit and State Flood Zone Control Permit. I 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: No 1 11. ' Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No I 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None 1 II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? x YES MAYBE NO b) Disru ptions, the s, isplacements , compaction or over- g YES MAYBE NO 1 (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? x ES MAYBE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO I (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? x YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES M_YBE NO Explanation: (1) (b) Approximately 87% of the site will be covered by either building or parking, the remainder will be landscaped. 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: 1a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? x YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? x YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna?• x YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See Attachment II (5) (a) & 11 (5) (d) 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The increased traffic generated will increase noise levels in the area but not to a perceivable degree. 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE N Explanation: buildingThe will introduce additional light to the area, but it will be consistent with the lighting levels of the surrounding business park. 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: I 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YTS M—AT1BE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES RATITE WO-- Explanation: 5- 12) Rousing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or create a demand for additional housing? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? x YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? x YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? x YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? x YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See Attachment II (13) (a) , II (13) (b) , II (13) (c) , II (13) (f) . 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? x YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? x YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? x YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? x YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See Attachment II (14) (a) & II (14) (b) . 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? x YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES MBE NO Explanation: The building will place additional demands upon existing energy sources. The building will be designed to meet the requirements of the Washington State Energy Code. 16) r Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? x YES MAYBE NO 1 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE N f) Solid waste and disposal?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Only connections to the existing systems are anticipated. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of artyahyscenic Arista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive s'te open to public view? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the givality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?x YES MAYBE NO xplanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical Site, structure, object or building? x YTS— MAYBE NO Explanation.: 1 III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is trjue and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of f 11 disclosure on my t. Sevent venue oratio Proponent: by: tA,7 (. sige ) Kevin J Henderson name printed City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 i I (7), The site is in an established business park with the western boundry adjacent to a golf course. A railroad spur separates the site and borders the site on the west and north. The site is generally flat with the raised railroad spur bisecting the northern half of the site. The vegetation on the site consists of scrub grass and blackberries. The entire site will be covered with either landscaping, parking or building. II (4) (a) The construction of the building parking areas and associated landscaped areas will require removal of all the existing vegetation which consists of scrub grass and blackberry bushes . II (4) (c) Landscaping will introduce ornamental species of flora to the site which will be consistent with the landscaping of the surrounding buildings of the business park. II (5) (a) The removal of natural vegetation on the site will result in a relocation of resident species to adjacent undeveloped land. II (5) (d) The existing wildlife habitat will be eliminated for all practical pruposes . II (13) (a) The office building will generate approxiamtely 1060 daily vehicular trips based upon 12 . 3 vehicular trips per 1000 gross square feet. The Trip Generation Manual, an Institute of Transportation Engineers Informational Report, second edition, 1979 , is used as a basis for this determination. II (13) (b) The project will add an additional 440 parking spaces based upon the zoning code requirements of the City of Renton. II (13) (c)0 The building will generate 1060 daily vehicular trips which represents an increase of 27% over the existing daily traffic of 3990 currently on SW7th west of Lind Avenue SW. II (13) (f)' The proposed project may result in an increase in accident potential to motor vehicles , bicycles and pedestrians . The increase of approximately 1060 daily vehicular trips to the street system will increase the number of potential conflicts . II (14) (a) The additional 88 , 000 S .F. of office space will increase requirements for fire protection from the City of Renton. The construction will conform to applicable fire detection and protection regulations for office buildings . II (14) (b) The new office building will result in increased public protection requirements. However, the demands on police protection will be minimized by security systems within the office building. AFFIDAVIT 1 7:3 11- , _7 v 40AlR I ,Seventh Avenue Corporation being duly ''stworn, decare that I am the owner of the property involved in this applicatid_that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this c / ay of November 19 80 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at SeeS7Y6 Seven venue rat'o. N me o o ry P blic) Sign t re of Ow r) Kevin J. Henderson S 216 First Ave. S. #350 Address) Address) a . 9d/ r, cX Seattle, WA City) State) 292-9090 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is ' to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has , been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . I Date Received 19 By : Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 b ING OF FILE FILE TITLE I 1 a' t i A. 1t; fy / 'r % i F FL F• .. FW ' f• JF. ^,