Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA81-068
BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED MIIIIIIIIIIIII I,IUP 61ka:1-— Lath uJs.., b i J.or se E. j _ 1.4016.4 M "Jq rffigimi• kW t 4 Y . 1 .r ,, 40.: 1 1 L-— Kd1.NJ-fu.l I R1TKE sI9OW-FLJTOWILTitw7:1 n 1. w - 0 iu:a ft(antSV- I JspwT Au+.. ' Si S eI W..1A 6 Nil I IV It n 4414. I i uu i C V T k IµrMf.Flf IP Wo=41 s r a JwcaJ1 siTE— I e L. KlJiS-, a1 1 SITE PLAID 1JDI,.ry4 i I Cflt, < o[J LF6AL & NPTIOhI .E, .__ I_-_ - C \/, t d ew.n m e..10.11..1.1[11.5 w..u..n,m1a'a.m' r.' ii[- -''e .n.° VIUIJrr MArµ..s ` .4 r--`_:„r', 1 ei I \ ! 1 I -1 r i 1, 1 1 1 r' j, IFFIj RI1 MILT NNE lit I r lip ii-it iU '• I 1i I it !1 3t r....? tz i.,.,mi. p141 t ,t , 4it ten I! i_ it I C R ir J SI t; i1 it4lll'lid4k im 1 111r-,.0 VW L.,...., I 1! ill iai, r i ..,. 1 it.t... ) e IMU.U,RY rialkItAiJ 4-eLEVATI005 ecAI.16H GLAIMS OPPIGE n n.. lance mueller IIJ&UI.AIJGE G-{tfl° I associates r-. architects else nand I Ws.On u..a:,....e,vs z_,*a C.» a 1.....ie.•..actin....n.selee vas ale IOW 1,44721...1, v./A. a i.•.no r.vl.l.n dale LINO - 1. I a AN DETAILS _ 1 Ili 71"""" wi w.I.rR"+..r. i 40 j0. • . .mow1 . ma. 4.1• .. •. . 1_• ApIlpro,.. ........ m mom. 0 w.1Ymo. iA..`AR fw' IB w I j/% i..'" . $t7f.,.,- I s#44taun;7,.:..;.;.. rah.• kb ........,.,...1 70.szaa..: .ter.c: I 7 I-.. ... oe o$f til Ill a 111 1 00 LULU.,,• i... M mo.. J EIf, a, NOTE> N' II MO*ONO.wO?•./O ow wart../.hI 0 la A.roof M r.M.OI.M.P.M.M r.... OWN.vYYh•.V.WN M,yary r IAHDgv p w or,.A LAC /RIO[MRO .•w I IL a...o. N...n......•*.a s n. 2 la If MO- .c......c.w......• corm•. w..•mama rMM Raw,*N.opoom w 4111 •aM• mo f,..•.••.NO.a CC r..M..J.IA....... A..oaw PLAN.'AS .. -:n•a.., SC . w...u.... W H I.•• wwf..w FOAL n .-.• »r..Mw OMO•.rM mom o...n....M D. pop LULU.. wolort.w Tr s-t op**AIw+6..L...ff.n two.u.•.nA w w w.n.w arm moo*MOO. diPm COMPM.m ipOr.o.v.....P..ra r soom M.wG.l+...r. • .lt•-.i rw.. .r O0. r..•rff M".Mf..APO.nwars i.+ -.. lt MIA ... re .n...rSaox......../...'Iw. Moomoo ms.U.•e.. q•-IV.u. w.. ...•o OM•OM.OMMO op ..molt/MM ..a ew.ew.v..•v.•-•AMPAs......• w..-.I..MS-.rw.u+.c. s ..'-fn L O. AS 001.0.1 M...wv uw.M...f......•..w..o+M.....wor U CC RUMP,•.R...r.trMMM..•MO..f co...t. • E-u.•.... I•.M•.. O 41 r"I. w... 4mma.*rook...... .....o ..e m.•. .o . s-n MOO. mow... L./KW s ..I• .•a.. momm nA on..MOM V.M.WIM SA N•, I PLANT SCFEDULERMOM.No ..w•r. w..wMI. t t SEC 3/)r23 N.r RSE W.M.Y" ---1 7 4 ......._ Willitaill t s 1. i ' h'--H y/ I I f _ r ca I CONTROL CB DETAIL 7 ""...... Viii ... ii IL I u m s I:\ 1 20—.-6-----L1--- hat? II F 1 r / r I W,. /t YV 1 \ V i I ,_ n I ;h O.. Lt%1 f\ \ 1 '4 \ 4, 1 1 .ar . $I 1 r wsII 1 / , I , e_/ t 1I r4, 4 11VDED e.cwawrmNamaimimronaa®mvvw:, 47ycavrwacte) ryI E r29s 11) I 2• ASAVALr Ca.wErE U-- 4 ' wS G6Mf RYY P axes,Y R _ A' V/ 11 h!``r_•__ hN ten ` 5 / / I, I ppp' t.•.•MIME! alb I Sr:...-rim j,p o— a I cowman curve I w... I tp T-...PREIJIMIAAY r r or.a. riov.r w: B[AKNNARK u r 1 mews.. r.s aaa.rw wrr rh fC xwYws w].wvwrew•a v wwt ewo. Mu+p n 5wem.icrrovs wwo ori.sr .r°ws...wvw+.ov er.+ Ties lance mueller associates architects aia 130 lakeside • *settle wash. 98122.206 325 2553 MEMORANDUM Date 0 •/ 2j1 JOB_ S1y,Wth_ Phone Call Purpose Conference Parties Involved F---I 1516 ifYlAk DETAILS: T 2 cop. tFrg coil\Jes12c"Io J PoS N) K)6e0 TAD r2e041771/Y\ rnfilg 12'0 t 1• 7st‘Nk PQS e ' t )QoQ R6.0is ohs geakX6-reo y Th Q612-- FvP- stzoPrtti9.644$61..)S. FLE, of R ANT aFC I IED ° U OCI 41 1981 ram L. NG EQP Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. Michele Roe being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that she is the Cui a Clerk of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Washington.That the annexed is a Hearing R6687 m 4 COx ° `-U WZm= .- o tcr_22 J 2 CD ccs = °r o rn wOamwQw E ° U oa o.E O ° c F-waHom mp.'S ciii c O h m 1-Q H U rn O i'' O 6z.s ° m LaOww U a C < not in supplement form of said newspapeas it was r) once eeachdin issue for a period ular issues(and Z o a IliZ o a• n 1 o c-o~O Q ro a c c a O >,ma a) CD cF-O>QZrnXz rno 2 co c— Z r; 3 °: c i c ° E-WZ5. -w0 NU¢ of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the a' o o< E cn ai-m J o cr w w c O a Q D 12 m Jw.E a<u)<O)IWHO a $ a' 17 day of August 19 81 , and ending the o w oF ..( _O a _T CD O oiZLn a ° Q zo _ O Em 000 1-ZQ W I-(n O.O c0 c Ow c O c>. pO day of 19 ,both dates Q Z O -O f-Z I a t E o n E ° z n(}E a `o inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- Z W Z CT:, a n m ` a u¢i U c ¢ Ern= m scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee U a O T O c7 U O. c w , o °o a p , ° g 3 a mUZwC7 0 0 ° c > c m u)¢O o me a1 N °.> charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 438 3,°which = -m p U o 3 E ai a o m w o °' E thasbeenpaidinfullattherateofperfolioofonehundredwordsfortheCL Q u z ro° ro o ° o co c' z -. o ` a, first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent Q O LL¢ ° ro N Qm c v a cn¢ o° a insertion. e) Z Q Y w¢0JOw JDF- u)WF-z(. DOc) ZDZOOwz(}U Chief C lerk o<z.=Ewammm ww<xm<mwcn-w 3=}xxzm Subscribed and sworn to before me this 25 day of O O z z o C0 a a Zm QOJ c zS aWW~mWpw_o 2 ZD= ZWAugu.st wawZ-wJ I,' .,..,,4._ n CQm-J¢2Uji..."te/fri.„);4 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing atunty. Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C.Form No.87 Rev.7-79 Public Notice Public Notice Public Notice NOTICE OF north of Sunset Blvd. 81, R-069-81) — Appli- ENVIRONMENTAL N.E. cation for rezone from G DETERMINATION FARMERS INSUR- to L-1 for future office ENVIRONMENTAL ANCE GROUP (ECF- warehouse and material REVIEW COMMITTEE storage use;property lo-cated07381, SA Q6$81) — west side of E.RENTON,WASHINGTON Application for site ap The Environmental Re- proval for construction of Valley Road approxi- mately 320' south of view Committee (ERC) has claims office in M-P S.W. 16th St. issued a final declaration of zone;property located in non-significance for the fol- Koli Business Center, Further information re- lowing projects: northeast corner of S.W. garding this action is avail- STEWART, VINCENT 43rd Street and Lind Av- able in the Planning Depart- AND (ECFINC 81, enue S.W. ment, Municipal Buildin , AND LOIS Application Renton, Washington, 235- ApP The ERC has further con- 2550. Any appeal of ERCforrezonefromGto8-1 sidered and issued a pro- action must be filed with the to bring into conform- posed declaration of signifi- Hearing Examiner by Au-ance with .Comprehen- canoe for the following gust 31, 1981.sive Plan; property lo- project: Gated on west side of Published in the Daily Re- Duvall Avenue N.E. ap- CARRACCIOLI,JULIUS cord Chronicle August 17, pru,...ndtely 300 feet AND STELLA(ECF-074- 1981. R6688 OF R4. u O THE CITY OF RENTONcypz MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ri o rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235 - 2593 09gTFD SEPTE P September 28, 1981 Mr. Ken Peterson 2021 152nd N. E. Redmond, WA 98052 RE: File No. SA-068-81 ; Farmers Insurance Group; Site Approval . Dear Mr. Peterson: This is to notify you that the appeal period for the Examiner ' s decision regarding the referenced matter has expired. Therefore, the matter is considered final , and all pertinent information regarding the request will be forwarded to the Planning Department this date for permanent filing. If this office can be of further assistance, please contact us at the telephone number listed above. Sincerely, A-V4--*q .Vat441t1"--- Fred J . Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Fred J. Kaufman being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the llth day of September 19 81 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. ii=1-9.-- ) 1( 431+ --------- G Subscribed and sworn th i s , e"' d'ay of LAp l/, 191/ . e 22.2,, ,,--_-_t-- Notary Public in and for t _St of Washington, residing a Application, Petition or Case: Farmer's Insurance Group; SA-068-81 The minuted contain a tint o 6 the pa tied o 6 necond. ) September 11, 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND, DECISION . APPLICANT: Farmers Insurance Group FILE NO. SA-068-81 LOCATION: Northeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 43rd Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to permit construction of an insurance claims office in an M-P zone. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to conditions. RECOMMENDATION Hearing Examiner:Approval subject to conditions . PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT:Examiner on August 27, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report , examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on September 1 , 1981 , at 9: 18 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the Planning Department report and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan with Planning Department staff comments Exhibit #3: On-site landscaping plan Mr. Blaylock noted difficulties with access easements, site design complications due to impending improvements on S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. , and problems with com- pliance with the Parking and Loading Ordinance requiring 5% interior landscaping. He cited concern regarding the parking area aisle width on the east, as it utilizes a com- mon easement which needs to be filed with the entire document. Responding to the Exami- ner's inquiries regarding access to the property, he indicated that it is confined to access through common easement on the northwest corner of the site. It was recommended that the actual landscaping between property lines and ultimate curb lines along both S.W. 43rd and Lind Ave. S.W. be delayed until completion of roadway improvements in approximately 18 months. A deferral from the Board of Public Works should be requested by the applicant. Relative to provisions for access and parking, the Examiner inquired regarding the adequacy of staffing storage and queue space for cars that may be visiting the site for adjustments. Mr. Blaylock noted that ten more parking spaces than required were provided by the applicant for this reason and suggested that the applicant may have further comment. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant: Responding was: Ken Peterson 2021 152nd N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 Mr. Peterson, indicating he represents the Koll Company and not the previous owner/seller who is unavailable at this time, suggested that , while he could not speak for the owner, he could provide some clarification. He advised that the deed and the sales agreement include the reciprocal agreement regarding common easement to the north. However, there is no reciprocal easement to the east presently. It was indicated that this could be an oversight, and documents could be adjusted to include it. Responding to Mr. Blaylock regarding the establishment of the original easements on the internal boundaries, Mr. Peterson again noted his unfamiliarity ,with the situation and indicated he thinks there 4, SA-068-81 Page Two are recorded easements only in cases where there are dedicated utilities. The Examiner noted that his review of files pertaining to Koll Business Park revealed that there was discussion regarding internal access and that the City Attorney and Public Works Depart- ment indicated that internal easements by private agreement were permissible but that some evidence will have to be shown to the City that they do exist. He also commented regarding several possibilities for site planning without the easement on the east. Mr. Peterson agreed that all options should be considered in view of the need for more speci- fic information from the absent owner. Responding to Mr. Blaylock, Mr. Peterson advised that the Koll Company still owns the lot to the east of the subject site and would be able to grant the reciprocal easement over their property. Mr. Peterson expressed con- fusion regarding the thirty foot access width requirement at the northwest corner, noting the curb cuts were put in under LID 302 and that they have a valid building permit for Phase II , which does not provide for this width. Discussion followed among Mr. Blaylock, the Examiner an Mr. Peterson concerning the probable background and justification for this change. It was noted that the intention is to get turning vehicles off the street and that the criteria had been changed by five feet between Phase I and the present time. It was confirmed that there was no change in the internal street width. Mr. Peterson indicated that he believes there will be no problem as long as this affects the right-of- way area only. The Examiner requested further testimony in support of the application. Responding was : Jesse William Johnson Lance Mueller and Associates 130 Lakeside Seattle, WA 98122 The Examiner incuired if Mr. Johnson is capable of speaking for the owner of the property. Mr. Johnson responded affirmatively. Mr. Johnson stated that, if the easement to the east is not provided, it will affect the amount of parking which the owner of the prop- erty would prefer but that he believes it is workable. He indicated that providing addi- tional interior landscaping and the thirty foot access width to the north should present no problems. The Examiner noted that thirty foot access requirements may apply to the entire property, necessitating a shift of the siting of the building and landscaping. Mr. Johnson indicated that this would be acceptable. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then invited final comments from the Planning Department staff. Since no further comments were offered, the hearing regarding File No. SA-068-81 was closed by the Examiner at 9:40 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a site plan to permit the construction of an insurance claims office in an M-P (Manufacturing Park) zone. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, th.e Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's. Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been isstied for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 6. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. S.W. 43rd Street. The site is level as the result of an earlier grade and fill operation. 7. The subject site was annexed into the city in April of 1959 by Ordinance 1/1745. The site was classified M-P by Ordinance 113016 in March of 1976. Orillia industrial plat and a subsequent boundary line adjustment created the subject lot. SA-068-81 Page Three 8. The applicant proposed developing a claims adjustment office for Farmer's Insurance Group. Pursuant to Section 4-730.040(9) of the zoning code, a building site plan must be approved by the Hearing Examiner for property located in M-P zone. 9. The applicant proposes a one-story structure containing approximately 5,456 square feet. The facility will serve as both a general office and as a drive-in inspection site. 10. The applicant proposed providing 42 parking spaces whereas only 27 parking stalls are required. The applicant must provide 5% internal landscaping in the parking lot areas. 11 . The site plan shows evidence of an easement along the north property line to allow access from Lind Avenue S.W. to interior lots located east of the subject lot. Similar easements are indicated on the east side of the subject site. No legal pro- vision for the latter easterly easement exists and access to parking on the east side of the facility will . not be possible without such legal easement executed in favor.of the subject site. 12. The LID fol S.W. 43rd Street is not finalized and construction is not completed along Lind Avenue so that. the applicant has been advised to delay installation of required off-site landscaping and other improvements. 13. The Traffic Engineering Department indicated that the access drive from Lind Avenue S.W. would have to be at least thirty feet wide,whereas the site plan indicates a a narrower access. 14. The applicant must provide for on-site retention of storm water. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The site plan and proposed use appear to serve the public use and interest. The applicant will provide sufficient parking and queuing space to allow for the on-site inspection of damage claims and on-site parking for both employees and customers . 2. In order to provide all the parking and queuing space proposed, the applicant will have to secure an easement for joint access for the eastern portion of the subject site. Without such easement, there will be no legally enforceable way for the applicant to access the proposed parking on the east side of the subject lot. I. 3. The applicant proposes landscaping and such will have to be approved by the city's landscape architect. Some of the landscaping will be installed at a later date due to the continuing construction on the LIDs in the vicinity. 4. In order to provide for efficient turning movements which minimally interfere with through traffic on Lind Avenue, the applicant must provide an access driveway of not less than thirty feet in width. DECISION: The site plan (Exhibit #'s 2 and 3) is approved subject to the following conditions: 1 . Provision of at least 5% landscaping interior to parking areas. 2. Acquisition of a joint use easement along the eastern property line. 3. On-site storm water detention/retention system. 4. Access shall be via Lind Avenue and said access shall be a minimum of thirty feet in width. ORDERED THIS llth day of September, 1981 . ZJJ\ Fred J. Ka an V4"---- Land Use He ring Examiner SA-068-81 Page Four TRANSMITTED THIS 11th day of September, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: James J. Peitz Farmers Insurance Group P. 0. Box 23503 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Ken Peterson 2021 - 152nd N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 Jesse William Johnson Lance Mueller and Associates 130 Lakeside Seattle, WA 98122 TRANSMITTED THIS llth day of September, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before September 25, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. , This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal of the site approval to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requites that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are avail- able for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 APPLICANT: FARMER'S INSURANCE GROUP FILE NUMBER: SA-068-81 A. SUMMARY i PURPOS':: OF :.l ST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to permit constructionofaninsuranceclaimsofficeinanM-P zone. B. FERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record: GINGRICH, HAROLD F. 2. Applicant : FARMER' S INSURANCE GROUP 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) Northeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 43rd Street. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Rent.on Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: 36, 678 square feet. 6. Access : Via Lind Avenue S.W. 7. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: M-P, L-1 , Light Industrial. 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park. 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on August 17, 1981 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on August 14 , 1981 . C. ,::;IST1®:1/:::ACKGROUNO : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 dates April 14 , 1959 . The site was rezoned to M-P, Manufacturing Park, on March 14 , 1976, by Ordinance 3016. The site was part of a phased fill and grade permit issued on October 13, 1976. The subject site was part of the Orillia Industrial Plat, the final plat of which was approved by. the Examiner on August 25, 1978. A boundary line adjustment was conducted on the subject site in early 1981 , which reduced the size of the lot from the original plat: y PRELIMINARY REPORT To THE HEARING EXAMINER FARMER'S INSURANCE GROUP SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE TWO D. YSICAL BJCKGI:,NUN D: 1 . Topography: The site is essentially level. 2. Soils : Snohomish Silt Loan (So) . Permeability is moderate in the upper part of the profile and moderately rapid in the lower part. . There is a seasonal high water table at or near the surface. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil is used for row crops, pasture, and hay. Urban Land (Ur) . Urban land is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with the addition of fill-up to several feet thick to accommodate industry or housing. 3. Vegetation: The subject site has been cleared and filled. What vegetation remains consists of low grass and scrub brush. 4. Wildlife: Existing vegetation may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: No surface water was observed on the subject site (August 14 , 1981 ) . However, the site is subject to seasonal high water tables. 6. Land Use: The subject site presently is undeveloped. Properties immediately west and north are or will be developed as storage/warehousing uses with possibly some retail similar to the subject proposal. To the east is the existing Koll Business Center and to the south is a bank and a service station. E. im' I1.I:1h 4,rAOO® CHARACTERISTICS: A combination of presently developed industrial land and undeveloped land in the process of being prepared for such development. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: A 16" water main extends east-west on S.W. 43rd Street and an 18" main runs north-south on Lind Avenue S.W. The Metro Gravity sewer runs along S.W. 43rd Street. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per Ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro Transit Route #155 operates along S.W. 43rd Street and Route #156 runs along SR-167. 4. Schools : N/A 5. Recreation: N/A G. PLIC-' :,LE SECTI*N S OF ! Trr ING CODE: 1 . Section 4-730, M-P, Manufacturing Park. PRELIMINARY REP -T TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FARMER'S INSURANCE GROUP SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE HREE H. APPLIC'•\ :LE SECTIONS OF THE CCP wuN SIVE PLAN OR (IITEE OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June, 1976. 2. Policy 5.B-4 (Site Plan Design) , p. 14 , Policies Element, Comprehensive Plan. Policy 6.B (Structures &Sites Objective) , p. 14, Policies Element, Comprehensive Plan, I. IMPACT Old THE NATURAL OR IF,vvi r TIRO T 1 . Natural Systems: Development of the subject site will increase storm water runoff, disturb soil and vegetation and increase traffic and noise levels in the area. Through proper development controls and .procedures these impacts can be mitigated, however. 2. Population/Employment: Approximately 24 new employees can be expected at the new facility (4.4 employees/ 1000 square feet of gross building area) . 3. Schools : N/A 4. Social: Minor 5. Traffic: The new facility would generate 62 additional vehicle trips per day in the vicinity (11 . 5 trips per 1000 square feet) . J. ENVIvwcmuslIAL ASSESSriU:PowT/THRESHOLD De ;.•ii, oA 'ION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance alnd the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, .as amended, RCW 43-21C, a final declaration of non-significance was issued for the subject proposal by the ERC on August 17, 1981 . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONT 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department. L. L PL EI'G DEP rr: oT ANALYSIS: The proposed use is. consistent with_ the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations of .Manufacturing Park for. the subject site and surrounding area. 2. The applicant plans to construct a +5,456 square feet one-story structure of wood frame with cement plastic exterior on the subject site. The building will provide two functions--general office and . a drive-in inspection facility. 3. As submitted, the site plan generally conforms to the requirements of the Manufacturing Park Zone regarding setbacks and perimeter landscaping. Parking required is 27 spaces and parking provided PRELIMINARY REPORT ) THE HEARING EXAMINER FARMER'S INSURANCE ZOUP SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE FOUR is 42 spaces. However, since a detailed layout has not been supplied, it is impossible to determine whether or not sufficient interior landscaping is provided to meet the 5% requirement of Section 4-2204-8B (3) . In addition, there is doubt as to whether or not an adequate aisle width is provided for the stalls along the east side of the subject site. Evidence will have to be supplied by the applicant demonstrating that these standards can be met prior to issuance ,of a building permit. 4. As noted in #3 , the perimeter landscaping proposed meets the requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. However, the off-site landscaping and improvements on S.W. 43rd should be delayed 'until the City improvements on the arterial are completed. 5. The Police Department advises that the proponent must participate in the cost of a traffic signal to be installed at S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. and in improvements to S.W. 43rd. The LID for S.W. 43rd includes the improvement of a traffic signal at the intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W _ 43rd. See other comment. 6. Future construction shall meet all City codes and requirements of the Fire Marshall as per Fire Department comment. 7. If future construction requires additional fire hydrants, the Utilities Engineering Division indicates that a water plan will be required. In addition, the proposed development will be subject to community facilities charges for water and sewer and a. latecomer' s agreement for. sewer. (Utilities advises that the latter may have expired. ) 8. Storm drainage calculations for the on-site system are to be submitted as per requirements of the Engineering Division. 9. The Traffic Engineering Division notes that the Lind Ave. S.W. access must be a minimum of 30 ' in width. 10. Throughout the discussion on the preliminary plat and the previous site plan approval for Koll Business Park, the applicant has shown cross use access easements along the interior property lines of the subject lots. These easements are not shown on the face of the final plat and must be verified as per analysis #3 prior to issuance of a building permit on the site. The site plan as presented does not function without the establishement of these easements. M. . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS Recommend approval of the subject, proposal, file SA-068-81 , subject to the following conditions: 1 . Compliance with the Parking and Loading Ordinance requiring 5% interior landscaping. r 1 PRELIMINARY REL ___T TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FARMER'S INSURANCE GROUP SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE FIVE.. 2. Construction of access at the northwest corner of the subject site onto Lind Avenue S.W. to be minimum width of thirty (30) feet. 3. Approval of specific landscape plans for off-site landscaping adjacent to S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. 4. Approval of a storm water retention system per Public Works Department approval. r a--_--1 r1.4.0Ptima I„ I U VP: t7,.6 G W la IiQ t II F- I II I I 7 fL 4 19 IL II .0 9 4 , T . -r1-1 1 N.A.•• ,.., —--— --—-- ——— , . I I. ,.on e I I!I L0 II ti•r.L) L4 L! 't. L7 Le Le 30 !I - -• I -- I .LLl= - 7,, T- L 44 a• 4e 47 .. 49!44. 49 42 41 401--f 3e 57 M 3, 34 !D DL 9Fjg 1. — f I - + + - -01 4 I --Attar 49 190 IS, 1 991 94 f9 j 94 97 15e » .I .L 1....3 44 .9 i .[et;ei I Bo /9 1$ t t 1a I vs i t4 -3 I I!I h 49 4. .t S . LL1_L_ I 1L I p..1 i I sue•dexii° 51-1r6 1 \ , 1 i , „. 1., 11:'-/ 1- i owl I Oea441110. s. 7MMqt./ y sti-le FARMER'S INSURANCE GROUP SITE APPROVAL SA-068-81 APPLICANT FARMER.'S INSURANCE GROUP TOTAL AREA +36,678 sq. ft. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Lind Avenue S.W.t 1 EXISTING ZONING M-P, Manufacturing Park EXISTING USE Undeveloped i PROPOSED USE Construction of insurance claims office COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park COMMENTS 3 r Revision 3/1981 Ww RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APplication:Sae . r.., z . 0 68 '. va+}c i i D1 A Location: ,h,erAtot),1_45'. ,' 3 113,,' Applicant: Fu'swr 'Issoramee 1,4)Q0 1( :O Publ i c Works Department Engineer',ng Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 1%}. . OTra c Eng. Division S/SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ' ati,iaties Eng. Division M ire Department Parks Department Building Department r 1 ® Police Depar..tment.... .,.' 00thers:• !. ... _.,.... ._..... . . .. . ..... .._.,....... COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS. APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE. COMMENTS TO THE' PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON 4244-CAY REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved [ pproved with Conditions ® Not Approved Ce 'i 't r/-s7/ c- DATE:9'/ /8/ Signature of irector or Auth rized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approvedlpproved with Conditions ®Not Approved St jEcr C o ,.r es g kc is . DATE: V7/7/ Signature of irector or Authorized Representative A . r... UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT T8 1 p LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER /d-r2 .,. LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER*. // yes ; " `t SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER Ca /.• c SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEWER 610 C sr '' ETC• Co* SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER J/0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SEWER /i 3MPROVED CATER PLAN APPROVED SEWER PLAN fip APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS A4 A d L-11-40 '"r.K5E1.-— C i W..,I..e E wlM Eal'.S'6ti e. Il:ceh Mg6r1r u.e i + j o-e..w.o ill,. w —LP -- I £ w MCI,wynwf n'v w. '- „ 0:Tw-C-t ,-' i 1;1yi= '.s r" i'fi ,..,. .'s ' I R . WJJ Nava.+n,'"'w off"i, i n, I I .".' -:' 5 w. w iC YhL I Y {"i. Y R pWhlS- jRr Y E I s.`... x r F .s tom- I- I 7'w s I a ;;. 4,.... y, 'a 6Dh6.16 J1 h I1Nt6 11 J'~ L-lei. ";i"<<'. .F. F .$, Y: Fall'IU! 7D.1 h c l i.eeyOW.M16ufoJ L%— L. 7 I x. c o! VQI.0 Ide. n ;r , 04 • iN 1: 1= J : y 4 l. 1,}--,yI 4 - —4Pwi A.A. • . Y . 3 I # I 0S VI :O fa[D1f Pr el-. 2.Dnso H1..:::: Ww= ]^$'' 64'4— A,PMLi SJn15•' I his» larr 4q'ni tCG r t 1astii,i i VAcPJf SITE- II , Ir. t SITE PLAID m Nor-rH ' M,IC``y`, tii -, ec.r•io' V I T! N i . .'47. LEHAL DESc{LIP fold i <- <e;1" IL .... sun„ u,unman.Rumania nm voum maw. ' ... --AA o.. w nm w.... p I I I 1 5 I tt, i I L---J a 3 71 7 i...i o o• j I c a S 1),..• k it' . . jug' ci rs'sA i w iiti4) mit, ilZ1sw it, 1549 1!I 1 IP." . r _t_ r_1.:„i it itl 1 ,..;',„,i t 31 ` ` 1:, 1!, iiiFs:,4 itiil 4 I-4 Ina! w. am(k.i 11,,r..41 1Itsi!ij a r' JMIIJAW FLC?iN fLa,J¢FLEVATIOI lS if;{co41G}j GLAIMs arna lob FA{zMF I IsLMcaIJ6E elate 6 architects ala onoo... I reiKrxn.uw.,.,1.*11....s a.I4C Sao io..w.....vw....f,leiral.•e06 awe 1.131,3 R.1,41721.1, Wn. doe. no, ..viol.., slot. ear' 4 Corso 18115 i 11' 0loop*It .01 ,0 ITr 1 it P 0 ih iv 3 is q 411:11 1 r ;,, / ,, -.w. l.1 0 i illromP7 0. t4. .0-.0.G.11 1 rAll g civ, f itfifff F6kkQ,:ee iq crF ,' i s I:' I a'oY4Wq¢w.R“L“I 1 400,, tkli L 1 Y Y c 1 IY ......oaw/IV i __ __ •!1It RI v m 1 : 1 itiii li il°11 lig1111;.• is tItt .a 111 i + g iii! !:e Mlill ilii$11.1 gill' E I F 4it $ a Ji ; Ht i ' E € f iiii" lf hp ¢ 1 t g 4/?n jt .s. fliii qii r ii ,10,i Z l 1 i P« o LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR RTH ENTER L-9PRISES FARMERS INSURANCE BLDG. Y sH =w.®r' tr r^.. to_ ri...... li U cP i !. CNNONIIII•.I WI C no JiNll ov rr J o r orv sho.a'[sau•vi/-/a.+a I.v..rc r '. V,VNHON3B' ow rww.wa ar/a.ia ew "sr.ow No r`C b.bO./O N ruL.w2c3o 7rs3Y s J t o P a. i err I - y e.a. s 3l. i r I)I J 7'—' ' / 7N130 NIAVd 107a 1Z •I n H I / 3S/COC1[X1 803N31YJ S/M,y.9t b{ v'LQ313JMJI7YNY .z h/rI e3u l T 2 Q;';,`;;'=, amnirm7r r w- I I[ 1 a" l H a.vi vans. a. I I 1 M --- 07-1 o 1. yf Imo_ ..j f'r / ` --_-= -- ea w 1`. Y • I O 4 ts ll ` I 1 IV fly . I /iir I I r i T\:-.-7- t\II Iz---- I oZ— •.. i ; t., iv a e aioalva7 I I ns. — c7 I o, was t nit. A419 .,1 7_m__——--——_a___—_/ rM IILi 'S V f a-a..' 'y;" S' . 0 ( T WM 6iS2/411E21 ra-73s 1 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : SA-068-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-073-81 Description of Proposal: Request for Site Approval for a claims office in M-P zone. Proponent: Farmers Insurance Group Location of Proposal: Koll Business Center, N.E. corner of S.W. 43rd St. & Lind Ave:1 S.W. Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on August 12, 1981 , following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Rihard Houghton James Matthew Ronald Nelson Steve Munson Dave Clemens Roger Blaylock Gary Norris Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-073-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: August 11 , 1981 2) Applications : SA-068-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Planning Department, Fire Department, Building Department Recommendations for a declaration of significance: Police Department Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non significance: Will not adversely affect adjacent properties. Signatures : 7 60,61 R nald G. Nelson vid R. Clemens, Acting Building Director Planning Director ichardC. Hou hton cting Public Works Direct DATE OF PUBLICATION: August 17 . 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: —August 31 , 1981 vision 3/1981 V/0 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application:StT vt 5 ur'a tt1t1r Q ll et gr4T ; w'<<® tr•. t , ft e S Location: Jai e Applicant: Farrgifteireir Dree)11., Public Works Department DEngineer',ng Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: %, y ,a. • R, OTra is Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:WO/t%tilities Eng. Division ire Department Parks Department Building Department - Police De,pa-rtme,nt Others: }.. _ ___..... _... COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDINGTHIS. APPLICATION :•SHOULD_ BE . PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE-COMMENTS- TO' THE- PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON 4V,741: I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L Approved 4pproved with Conditions ® Not Approved zd ice' ee),vs-7C7a/-0 _ CS V/3u. .A- e7- 7-/rj DATE:Sl'/ e/ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved [approved with Conditions ONot Approved 54.0jECt 'o C o~lee 2s O .( ekc ie . Ft,-( iooa 7iv..ta t. 14-tarAUa— (ld'QZtµI?.t/ l i pl2tt' oelx7 (te[2d‘ /) DATE: t/7lQl Signature of Director or Authorized Representative i 1 I UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO ] bit) LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - WATER !41_31I LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER r I .., n. y5 " „ SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER Ala c SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SEWER Jo CO I5Tc. co/6. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER //p SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SEWER h/p APPROVED WATER PLAN APPROVED SEWER PLAN JNp APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS b vision 3/1981 1 Y rii RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application:i$IT -'"=` ' ®U,4d,. (54.0068 ® i erejodifiuki ie eipsSi , Location: SW„ c5 at Applicant: Ettypneirfc Zsompuge Droup TO:Publ i tlorks Department ngineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: %% ' i 1® Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:WOOf D Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department 0 Parks Department Building Department DPolice Department D others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON ie2S:#4, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 2773 Approved ' Approved with Conditions D Not Approved i) pYv'Y'" — ,f o r.,..0, t G,,4 ', s ' ` 4 G„.,DATE: kV/3/1-7 Signature of Director o Au hori zed Rep sentative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved D Approved with Conditions D Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative vision 3/1981 WO RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application: S /7F ee in am `• .'t® : r ote 0 Location: Al eon,ep.. r. 1,4 4 ' v . SW 0Slijt .. St f Applicant: &WOWSZJiegh D re ip TO:Public Works Department SCHEDULED ERC DATE:DEng' eering Division raffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED T C ULED HEARING DA E: , iW:, Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department I Parks Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON 1/4/2S: ;•1 REVIEWING DEARTMENT/DIVISION: t?,5?/=j=/C ivG/ALF)E' /Af Approved pproved with Conditions ® Not Approved f l/moo/ , e tS,, JCS r?-ter c 2 0 60-' 7 , Z.I.L.-2gL"----'DATE: 1//-2/gr Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved (Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative R sion 3/1981 WV RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application:SATE`Afrif2N MI- Oft°o 68 811/) Prep/SA i TO e.NSrV d # Location: LJ uu73 f Applicant: Fanner} 2',$vri,Ir.ee Droop ID:0 Public Works Department 0 Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:Oa/8! 0 Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:WO/4V 0 Uti1ities Eng. Division 0 F•re Department El rks Department 0 B i 'ng Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON etzsleY REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POT,TCE DEPT_ Approved a Approved with Conditions Not Approved L) Access to the site should be from both Lind S.W. & S.W. 43rd. Participate in a signal at S.W. 43rd & Lind S.W. 3) Participate in the improvements to S.W. 43rd. DATE: 8/4/81 Signature of hector orsHuthorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved []Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative vision 3/1981 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application:IS&T Pii3L A-q/6 ' Y Prepagia.,4.044dirV O f 5 ure c Gr '. 6 I4A a '-‘;1 era- a al 14 e Location: Abreemer de /044%el ale* SW 4 S 4934 5f.. Applicant: Farmers ZsemtiphgeDrovii TO:Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: Gam : ' ; i Traffic Eng. Division l,Y'SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ar'' , Id 1ities Eng. Division Fire Department Par Department Building Department Police Department Others: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON ViSle REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ® Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved DATE: 7IO Si gnat f Director or Authorized e resentative9P REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved ['Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative OF R- v A. o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 oammo • BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9.0 Co' 235- 2550 o44? SEPAE Q August 17, 1981 Farmers Insurance G roup 4680 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90010 Re: Application for site approval for construction of claims office in M-P zone;-File No."SA=06 8-81 ,property located in Koll Business Center, Northeast corner of S.W.43rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. Gentlemei: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on July 28, 1981 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been' set for September 1 , 1981 .at 9:00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours, Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner cc: Harold F. Gingrich Lance Mueller & Associates 130 Lakeside - Seattle, WA 98122 t- " " - • • Nol ,'t,i-A.?"-.4*,,,4•0.Ai••,,,!irr.•.,,, ,•.,.„,:•,..,i' .;' ,,o, „. .. ,,,.,,,:., .,,, ,.... ..• .‘.,,. 4;T1' ,.iff.'i,).4kxj.,1,:- r,.... ,• ,,,,, 4„ ,),,,,ttf,,-.-- . •,.•.z:v...v,..,..,,,, - •;• • - .. ..,..,.. - , ,i' • , ... ..., 11/4•,,i% .k. ,.:--.1.-,!!. ,MI.,,,......'•:."17. . e.''''•,-, 44,,, 4'. !_ii.,...krt,:,,,:' ,A. A • k,.• . rt, i ,.•., •;p444....... . ..,.:•,-..,:,•••,•,••,• .,•-. . ,,,•,•:. .• g:, f. 1'.‘4'!" t..,,f '2 '''f.'''...1-;i41',' ,A ''', '1''' * '' .•', ...;'. ,'''''--'-,,v. -,,,--, ,-. • 4. , ' . i ' : --‘ ,,--,',,:'-' 4,,,..114:0,i,4 _.„.,,,,', sl,!::-.06,. ,:, t.,... . * : .,' .2,,:::-'''1,,,- '. • ,', !,'„_ ,..sf'. ' - '''''. '2 ', ' '. • r:. '''',4,, 4'..41t:,'-?,24,:: %''' "tttt ...'WO16.4 ' -'42...''.'‘ • :."9 :,. '.--;4. ,'-',„''''',...t,. , , , . . -,, i., r , , „i . r ,,, ir,r, , i, les r.-•!..i...;4•)„,. ,. t,,,.,•;,,,I. , ..., -, ,.4 .. ;,.. Ar.,..,,..v,iittli.x,,.„..„„.,..,4,:,,,:ii,„,.,,...,,, .af.,...„.„ _, ...,,crip:., , , . .,,,, ,,,,,,,!,,,.; . 4,,,,:. •. 1 ., ,. . 47,. 1 :,•.-;. .=,... 34y.,7?.--.. ,,•,- • :... - . r•ik`z,;#,: . ,,::,31-4-!. fi.„-.•&, .k.:=t,-Ix,;.‘, 4.,,,,,„ ,•• ..•, - ..41, - 'I r.-k ,,!--,,i 7' .. '''.•'.:1-",, f±i:F.,it' '',.'.'''c.,!:'''' '. '• ' ' 1:.;4.:;,,,r.*'', i' -; ::- L - 0 .•'•-54• •• ' • i. ., ` , Sa l':''•` e 8'''. :. •, .; .., 4 •• ). i .x.:.t.,'•.0, N.- • 1 e VI ,••f; ' •.•.'''. • ^,' 44, ,' '• ,..14,' , 4 i.„' - ' :,:',•: 4::-t ,i,''''' ' li.' ">`.' '0,ne 4-:,'.-A: , 41. . . , .-.:. .t-$:• 1,... A A. , ; , 7 4. :, 1...,„;.:47.- t ,'',1:, .. --.;.••it'. r,,,,,. i''!. , •-- '. ,,, - ' -' - A. ., ,,,L ,:.., 7%4....1 .., : •t - #-•,• f •• 4. i lit-,, 41‘W 4'. ' 4. ' . .. ' v. . • 1_,. , _, '.-„4--0.,,,, , •- f.-I i-.- ' ci-e,...- i.'. JF- ' . a '0'0. •' l'.,.F. ,, - El il:tir,;• tr:, . - . tit ,t,,10 •4.,;'["• 1a i„0 t' ' '', I ,r ". OE NERAL L047:ATION: OR ADDRESS:AND, I . ' • PROPERTY LOCATED IN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF S.W. 43RI) .,STREET, AND• LIND AVENUES !.i,- . . .-k, i.. LEGAILVEliatiPilON: 'L • ' ' Cf.:. i";- r."- P ..1k -: ! ''''. ' .:;-". ,-,1' 4',:'• ' :• i ' ,, ' t . 4.!'. • •-•A 74• 4.:. c.:... LE.GAL -Dtit RIO'I'ON',,(IN .FILEAN- ,RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT I ' ' . ''''''1"r.' i ' ' '' )''• • • ' '.' 1..,N4.,-tr',,,..,, , .4' ' ''''• ' '.-.::--.-i e•• "l, • - ,, - ' :: 1 , 4."' 1,.' ., '.;i - ' '.-,4"'•,•• -'•..'.. •.. , ,,:.• , . '-,.,• •-.•i, '. , • '.'• 4 ...'-..,':.4.,. .,‘• „,',. .--••;•„i,. -:„..,-;,•••?v,,'- ,•,-,,••'•'• ,,,,- „.. •..-,,, t,- `..-' :' -.i7 ' I f", ;"' A.•' 'A. ',.'- '''0"--f'144. '''' z'' ' " t ..• ,,. , . 4•!, .'" t1 1. .', ''' , r i 8 POSTED TO :NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF 72, , '.,, ';IA's:, 1''F;-:. i ai.. ... . 1!=r1 f; '''' • a F t 4 P.-77Ft',. ' 771 ii,4 c' :!...ti..,, :4/ -:',..? i-.-,• I,,,•- T. C,) BE,- IIELD r IA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS9 MUNICIPAL BU INILDGi 1., . El Fil GMiNIING AT '__9.111:.........,:_,A.M.ptoiti SFDIftleal; ‘.19E11...... . i 3 P.M. CONCERNING i E-ii Flr.zzoNo.,. al, it,i. D ‘,2,3 CI'Pi-...twwc''r,—i/At, as r"F;11 R . 1 firta •ri ;10 1TP tiP?"11." RI/11/AL-TO CONSTRUCT CLAIMS OFFICE IN M-P ZONE r.,„11 -,,,,,,,,i„ li,t,..autre.4.L...,1 ie. Ai 4i.Vii , 1 ,,,,,„ 7• k "-- .41 ;•, -; 'v• „ 1.•,, ai Z11,:s.- 54:YY.fr411' '0-'3 RE:LIE iA, i :A , -,.... L .AGE 4'9 ' N . 4 A .,..,, , 1 tl' FINAL DECLARATION- OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - DIRECT APPEALS- TO 1 HEARING EaYlIffER ay Akusi,51„,193.1_,.._- _ FOcI FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2554 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT. PROPER AUT149RIZATIONi l' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP Application for site approval to allow construction of claims office in M-P zone, file SA-068-81 ; property located in Koll Business Center at northeast corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. STEWART, VINCENT AND LOIS Application for rezone from G to B-1 to bring zoning into conformance with Comprehensive Plan, file R-067-81 ; property located on west side of Duvall Avenue N.E. approximately 300 feet north of Sunset Blvd. N.E. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 , AT 9 :00 AM. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: August 17, 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 14th day of August, 1981 . e SIGNED: 4S1e*"E.41MA,4444V'In0 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects: STEWART, VINCENT AND LOIS (ECF-072-81 , R-067-81 ) Application for rezone from G to B-1 to bring into con- formance with Comprehensive Plan; property located on west side of Duvall Avenue N.E. approximately 300 feet north of Sunset Blvd. N.E. FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP (ECF-073-81 , SA-068-81 ) Application for site approval for construction of claims office in M-P zone; property located in Koll Business Center, northeast corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. The ERC has further considered and issued a proposed declaration of significance for the following project: CARRACCIOLI, JULIUS AND STELLA (ECF074-81 R-069-81 ) Application for rezone from G to L-1 for future office, warehouse and material storage use; property located west side of E. Valley Road approximately 320 ' south of S.W 16th St. Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by August 31 , 1981 . Published: August 17, 1981 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : SA-068-81 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-073-81 Description of Proposal: Request for Site Approval for a claims office in M-P zone. Proponent: Farmers Insurance Group Location of Proposal: Koll Business Center, • N.E. corner of S.W. 43rd St. & Lind Ave!a S.W. Lead A•enc Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on August 12, 1981 , following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton • James Matthew Ronald Nelson Steve Munson Dave Clemens Roger Blaylock Gary Norris Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-073-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: August 11 , 1981 2) App'ications : SA-068-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Pla ning Department, Fire Department, Building Department R nd t ns forecgmmeaioo a declaration of significance: PoliJce Department Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact. on the environhnent. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by. , ' the lead. agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead: agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non significances-:., Will not adversely affect adjacent properties. Signatures: R nald GJ Nelson vid R. Clemens, Acting Building Director Planning Director ift. t.4e.d.(/ rd C. Hou hton sting Public Wgrks Direct DATE OF (PUBLICATION: August 17 . 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: August 31 , 1981 Date circulated : _,fS ® Comment iue : A JV ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEU SHEET ECF - 40 - APPLICATION No (s ) . . 8.- n PROPONENT : Fiarotri$042;SeiraeN ce ra tic ptrig") 'Sit1 ef//crge44 PROJECT TITLE : 6/T FY' .. :viz=` i Brief Description of Project : ,, s , ,a/ Ag,..se,,. io . /gt..,,s cake, LOCATION : fl r '" .4. br 3 $ ' 1 SITE AREA : 7 BUILDING AREA (gross) ± 3 9. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : ' IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 14,221.:::::::::3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 )' Ajimal life : • 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : t d d8 ) Land Use ; north : U east : Ko1lSwsiN0Is e.......4. south : {/Vo,ea hovpt1 I west : thithe v atop edl Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 1 10 ) Risk of upset : v 11 ) Population/Employment :i 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : i13 eitokkitittoiruid viteepyelia traffic impact : 4 14 ) Pilblic services : 15 ) Energy : 11--16 ) Utilities : 17 ) H4man health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Acheology/history : COMMENTS : 1 Recommendation : DNSI4.00 DOS More Information___ T Reviewed by :-th .Re. "04sd 1it1e : t 4/ ,/IM ee% Date : 9/11/91 FORM: ERC-06 it Date circulated : /V/ A Comment.s due : 2 /0 , f® E I UIROU NEI iAL CHECKLIST CW IIIEJ SHEET 1 ECF APPLICATION No (s ) . S/9'® 8a .' , PROPONENT : FlUr kriASUr CC CVOEI/ (I ,ie'e#4l,ef/ece ire PROJECT TITLE : 61re APPAWAL. Brief Description of Project : '' `' .'.tom / gam : ve dt chibsis e ce. LOCATION : ,V /iflOr ti;'049 ofve,,,P,v, "sia 93 t SIZE AREA : 3L. 47895BUILDING AREA (gross) fiSb1 CLD DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : v 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) PlantlI life :L/ 5 )' Ahimal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 2 , 3 X 5 -6 -- 6 8 ( vl -v-5•P,.S) . traffic impact s T1t1-2-y-a1 4c t'I ,3cf cp tLtr del! !oP erg ' gal` t 1-6 s114 ) P lblic services : d `i" o 15 ) Energy : I 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Rcreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : NM COMMENTS : Recomm4ndation : DNSI v DOS More Information Reviewed by : I itle : f. _- - Date : 7jal Q/ FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : ti it® Comments' due : S AO1?, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WEVIIIEU SHEEP ECF - 07,3 - APPLICATION No (s ) . PROPONENT : FartVier6.C.rokSeirtunee2 Gra up adotrPg1eAd- i+', PROJECt TITLE : /T Brief Description of Project : z* ,," S &649,114:wee.# ,, rekirwS A LOCATION : r '3' egbSITEAREA : 7 BUILDING AREA (gross ) ± S® DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIE4J NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) plater & water courses : v/ 4 ) Plant life : v/ 5 )' Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Lund Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset. : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Hyman health : V. 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) REcreation : 20 ) A> cheology/history : q COMMENTS : I Recommendation : t SI_ DOS More Information 1 Reviewed b g v6-skkcYlitle : Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date cjirculated : v/V / ii/RJCommentsdue : f ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REQIIEU SHEET E C F - 73 - i APPLICATION No (s ) . PROPONENT : i' S eeCredit; afyet&a PROJECT TITLE : 17r Ae Brief Description of Project : a e LOCATION : C p ®p o F' 73 ,.5Pi SITE AREA : c o s BUILDING AREA (gross ) 2164541S4 etx DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :i 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) W ter & water courses : t/ 4 ) Plant life : 5 )' Animal life : 6 ) NIbise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : v 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I/ 15 ) Energy : 1/ 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : t/ 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : J 20 ) A>i:cheology/history : U COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSIy DOS More Information i Reviewed by : i itle : aW Date FORM: ERC-06 1 1 Date circulated :*Iy/8® Comments due : 2 i//R/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEU SHEET ECF - O - APPLICATION No (s ) . .Siia0434-0/ PROPONENT :FlarMerISZASUMIPMce Gra , (lop("Roe/4r,"rcf) PROJECT TITLE : S/Te APP.o t. Brief Description of Project : 6610,5'41 / 741ge repodipt. chid*ts afgefCeL LOCATION : /1/Ceo/$IP h' 4V,S• t/ i' 3 1S? f SITE AREA :* 34, 479rP BUILDING AREA (gross ) ± J 5 4C4 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : 1 west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : I 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : xxxx 14 ) Public services : X}rxSrx 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENT : A drive-in claims office will generate a considerable amount f traffic in the area. Thus the development should participate in the improvements n the area. Also due to the offices extreme location on the So. city limits it should be alarmed, and welllighted (lights should shine in on the building) . Recommendation : DNSI OS xxxx More Information Reviewed by : D . Persson Title : Date : 8/4/81 FORM: ERO-06 Date circuiated : 4V/ Comment due : ili4/0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REV!EU SHEET ECF - 03 - APPLICATION No (s ) . S a — / PROPONENT :_ v e 'k ;e.S lA ec ' Greiu tilde*ee/411lie//ee/lt€& PROJECT TITLE : S/T O PPP L I Brief Description of Project : Pepped,A/ A, tow seeti'0, c hi,a LOCATION : Ara/Mgr 119") ri 4 ilp.SW fISIti Viamsce SITE AREA :*BUILDING AREA (gross) ± Vp$'r DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 4 i 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Wrter & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 )1 Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) ' Light & glare : d 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : I Land use conflicts : 7 ey View obstruction : x9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset :K 11 ) Ppulation/Employment : x 12 ) Number of Dwellings :X 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Plblic services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : _ Lx17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : X\ I COMMENTS : Recommendation : t SI X DOS More Information Revi ' 1ewedby :T itle : 221- 8V6 iD 0 Date : 1 © FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : Virzi Comments due : /40ENVIRONMENTALCHECKLISTtREV1IEUSHEET ECF - 3 - APPLICATION No (s ) . S, — w , PROPONENT : Far meriS TEAS e,aere Gra p ado A.e/Afore,4k1) PROJECT TITLE : 6iT PeA Brief Description of Project : g ttowdve ehieega 60._ LOCATION : QmPr linve.$W i's4, Vag:1075Y. SITE AREA :BUILDING AREA (gross) ± 3Weg DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : '— IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : V f 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : _ 3 ) Water & water courses : Y 4 ) Plant life : I 5 )' Animal life : I 6 ) , Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : i west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 4 17 10 ) Risk of upset : k 11 ) Population/Employment : S 12 ) Number of Dwellings : V/- 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : i 16 ) Utilities : V 17 ) Himan health : vi 18 ) Aesthetics : i 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : I Recommendation : DOS More Information Reviewed by : Date :P,<S%/ FORM: ERC-06 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AUGUST 12 , 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10 :00 A.M. THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS : RaMAC, INCORPORATED : (ECR-061-81) STIRSKEY HOLDINGS, LTD. : (ECF-075-81 - B-258) LYLE PICKLE : (ECF-069-81) NEW BUSINESS : STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPT. OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE Proposal for one-story office building (13,416 square feet) and parking for 77 cars to be utilized by Employment Security Department; property located at N.E. 10th Street and Index Avenue N.E. ECF-071-81 SUPERSTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT LTD. SA-066-81 Application for site approval for a 30-unit housing project for the Renton Housing Authority; property located in the vicinity of 2821 N.E. 4th Street ECF-072-81 STEWART, VINCENT AND LOIS R-067-81 Application for rezone from G to B-1 to bring into conformance with Comprehensive Plan; property located on west side of Duvall Avenue N.E. approxi- mately 300 feet north of Sunset Blvd. N.E. ECF-073-81 FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP SA-068-81 Application for site approval for construction of claims office in M-P zone; property located in Koll Business Center, northeast corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Avenue S.W. ECF-074-81 CARACCIOLI, JULIUS AND STELLA R-069-81 Application for rezone from G to L-1 for future office, warehouse, and material storage uses; property located on the west side of East Valley Road approximately 320 feet south of S.W. 16th Street Pi r I liA it i IiI L ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Y I , l AUGUST 12, 1981 I NC.;` fp" 17 ' a . b, 1 1-7: --'-1 1 1 i......4 IC r\,na-' hiliLl41( I: C_.. LAKE il =. e WASHINGTON '1\ 'm . ; 5 :ram;STEWART 4.1. A 11" Ildriiiriftbi 'Hi _ 1 O • zz-iiiiiiiciarai-..EFE-7 çI' ! STATEEMPLOYNT Ni Is, ogmi 1 11pm- ft grsiimei i I L 1 pi..ltsq4i,4 " r l lip ti,...„ . 1 SUPERSTRUCTURE 14 t, jam10e aWll aR nii` Wi1i1Mi"1i11i1Vk 1-':. A sh ll 1 r- 17---,....." .--- 1: I\:__........ . 1111lifilagft),--: 111ftwiditSMINE 1111. 4-7- 7gm'a4P-: s 611-1j1 ii v _ witir, pi A-,37::::_:-L-1..'N. ..)1.---.. /---11117--- f. k ---- .Nrogagike-----4,...-a .. . . 4„msMill lira' T 'CARACCIOLI 4 gm. , 1111SLIn.,„„..4111414. 0. 1.,...7.4t1 ' m,, 7 ,...-,it 11111: wirli MaiII i Illga1131 WI 14. 46,,, „ FARMERS' ,. -: I I —------ bdil ' Iry MN t .,.: E----- d c j LANE d I i. IYOUNGS LANCE MUELLER L-Eur-P CIF -nQmen Dmr-Qil.ASSOCIATES/ARCHIT 'S 130 Lakeside Suite F SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE JOB NO. 146 • 206) 325-2553 ATTENTION po4 o riiptowsYrTO1I, I RE: 1,s3r2.61..)te ati of tre2-oli-iip 61Qct4- 140 milk hoe 6i ge,41 1 lctvq( tAlsi 1444 ' ofz-FLL.G: 7lO WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached Under separate cover via the following items: Shop drawings Prints Plans Samples Specifications Copy of letter Change order COPIES DATE i NO.DESCRIPTION I a-A' ! 1 e c ct,Js F_1 , G.f0 5° THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: E, °" r n jl i3 G ' For approval Approved as subm7 ted Resubmit copies for approval For your use Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution As requested Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints For review and comment FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO P tiff AlSIGNED PRODUCT240-2 / ss/Inc.,Groton,Mass 01450 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION SITE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE USE ONLY f File No. SA- e9A -o Filing Date A Application Fee $ /i4. Receipt No . rpARTCp<O /' , /9/9/ p0 Environmental Review Fee $kl, APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1. Name FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP Phone (213) 932-3200 Address 4680 Wilshire Blvd. , Los Angeles, Calif. 90010 2 . Property location N.E. corner 43rd Street S.W. & Lind Avenue al2/2A.4 d/so 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) See attached plan A- "bieV c7F Aot ' *OS-N 4. Number of acres or square feet 36,678 s.f. Present zoning MP 5 . What do you propose to develop on this property? Propose Claims Office 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' . C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. Rev, 1-77 THE ` ERICAN INSTITUTE OF HITECTS I AIA Document 8141 t,. • rd Fo r rr of Aila 'ee e t totetweert Swner and Arc- ftect 1977 EDITION THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES;CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED t%'ITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION AGREEMENT made as Hof. the 18th day of March in the year of Nineteen Hundred and Eighty-One F. I.G. HOLDING COMPANY BETWEEN the Owner:4680 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90010 LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS and the Architect: 130 Lakeside, Suite F Seattle, Washington 98122 For the following Project: Include detailed description of Project location and scope.) SeattleiSouth Branch Claims Office at the corner of Lind Street and S.W. 43rd Street. A one-story, slab-on-grade building with a 5,456 sq.ft. claims office, 960 sq.ft. inspection area. Total site area 36,678 sq.ft. July 1 1981 The Owner and the Architect agree as set forth below. c , Q0Iler AS$o Copyright 1917. 19.16, '.'IJl1, 1911, 1'ti7, 19511. 1961, 1963, 191,6, 191,7. 197o, :9;4, O 1977 by the A nenr,ol Institute ui Arrhrtects, 1'.i" New York Asenue, N W. 1Vashtngtnn, I)C :IWEI ReprudurIron rtl the material herein or substantial quotation of its provtsurns without nermnsron of the AIA violates Ire copyright laws of the United States and will he suolect to legai prosecution. AtA DOCUMENT 11141 • OWNLR•ARCIII11C1 AGRI[MIN1 • 1NI[IEENTII EDITION • JULY 1977 • AIA9 • G)1977 THE AMLRICAN 1's.S1IRill Of AP(ill It(T. 1731 NI1V ls)RK AMI NI L, N N , A.SMNCION, U.C. 20006 B141-1977 1 AFFIDAVITczh , JUL 15 7981 I,Harold F. Gingrich being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this;tiapplication and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and" the information herewith submitted are in all respects true anct-cor;rect to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and 'sworn before me Ni,/ this 02q Zday of 19 f/ , N ary Public in and or the State of l r s residing at 4 Nam of No a y Public) 1 ature Own Vic Presf ent F. I .G. Holding Co . tAddr e s s nmoon,mmmmm,unnunnu mmumm mmm mmmmmnnnnmmum 4680 Wilshire Blvd .nnmmn OGS CIn, ava, CAROL SULLIVAN = Address) 1 A'7, NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA e ';jr PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Commission Expires Sept..20, 1981 r imYrHc ntmmmimmimm,mmnmmmmmwmunnumum,mmummmim,mifi,n Los Angeles , California 90010 City) State) 213) 932 3200 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found viOe rough and complete in every particular and to conform to the r s ill e4u1tions of the Renton Planning Department governing the f ' gr Olch plication. rttLL iii LUU 5 Date Received itta6 4 1981 , 19 By: o_................ R Z1 ! ® / 1 Renton Planning Dept. 2-73 4\ TY OF RENTON, WASH I NGTON E VIR0NMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM c) FOR OFFICE USE-O:I;JNI'L Application No. 5 - 2/-// Environmental Checklist No. Fe A-- e2 PROPOSED, date:FINAL, date: QDeclaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, 'or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This , is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the .. next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1 . BACKGROUND 1. Name- of Proponent FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 4680 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, Calif. 90010 A.C. 213- 932-3200 3. Date Checklist submitted July 22, 1981 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Farmers Insurance Claims Office 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Proposed building is. (1 ) one story slab on grade, wood frame with cement plaster exterior. The building_ is divided into two functions - general office and a drive-in inspection facility. All parking is contained on site. r//2 V 2- 3 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : N.E. corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Avenue site is generally flat. with some field grass vegetation. Site has been previously used for construction yard and storage for Phase 1 Renton. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : January, 1982 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : Flood Control Permit Building Permit 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes ,, explain : NO 11. Do you know of any plans by, others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: YES - Koll Renton Phase 2 12. Attach any .other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: NONE II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- . covering of the soil? X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief X features? ES MAYBE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of .any unique geologic or physical features? X YES MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , X either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO , f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YES FinTE NO Explanation: a,b) Due to compaction. c) • Due to fill and grading. C s J- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: a) Due to dust during construction, normal building exhaust and auto - truck exhaust during construction and use. 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters?X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?X YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available X for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: b) Due to absorption reduced by building and paving. Ruri-off detailed by storm system. f) Due to (b). g) See (b) . 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs, grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? Tin— MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: c) Possible new species in landscaping. d) No longer economically productive as agricultural use. 4- 5) Fauna. Will' the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the .numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: a) Fauna will be destroyed or forced out by construction. b) See (a). 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Increased traffic to and on site. 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or Xglare? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Office lighting etc. visible at night. Exterior lights of non-glare type, 8) Land Use. ,Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use 'of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO , Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X Y MAYBE 3 Explanation: Slight impact - total work fnrco estimtnd at 50+ 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or create a demand for additional housing?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: New business will require new employees which will need housing. Some will be from relocation and..wil•l not need houS'inq, 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?X YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: a) By employees and truck traffic,. c) On-site f) More traffic generally creates greater hazards. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? (Emergency only) X YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? (Emergency only) X YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO , d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?X YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding Xmentalhealth)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: - 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE N0 Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X YES AYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that-the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent:, signed) JESSE WILLIAM JOHNSON LANCE MUELLER & ASSOC./ARCH. name printed) 130 Lakeside, Suite F Seattle, Washington 98122 206) 325-2553 Agents for the Owner. City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 eceipt # CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME 4 DATE / 1/ =k • PROJECT & LOCATION I Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total r e Environmental Checklist Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank vnii_ LANCE MUELLER ASSO13GC ALak ESQ/ARCHISuite FE i L-E'7 ; 1p 7 7En.RS ]0e SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 981ZZ DATE „/w JOB NO. 206) 325-2553 V ATTEN ON xs/VA)/, fir TO i RE: 1450/Pr'd V`rld OFe. WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached Under separate cover via the following items: Shop drawings Prints Plans El Samples Specifications Copy of letter Change order COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION c• '/`' S! X 4A/6 10i2D J4LiDL- 4C43,61//`J4 A.J.tovAk /°z46xJc 2, eel 1/18 G 1i'ST e ra THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit copies for approval o e Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution As requested Returned for corrections Return corrected prints For review and comment FOR BIDS DUE 19 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 1(3 1- 1 4 TO F;ZGG SIGNED: A/10_2_ 10-2 (AaJinc,Groton,mass01450 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. NDING OF FILE FILE TITLE 4,1 I 4v.h t t " 1:4 4'I 4 t e4• f