HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA81-077BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
MICROFILME ,
I
177181 .
f
DE.—, RTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
r z FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
sq:". • NORTHWEST REGION
c. ,...,....2, '
5r
FAA BUILDING KING COUNTY INT'L AIRPORT
SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 08108
5°f P
Mr. Charles.L. Roberts
Renton Aviation Inc.
840 West Perimeter Road
Renton, WA 98055
Dear Mr. Roberts:
We have reviewed your proposal to construct four rows of aircraft hangars
and expand the existing service hangar 375-feet abeam Runway 15/33 centerline
at Renton Municipal Airport. Although the structures as proposed would
exceed the' standards of Federal Aviation Regulation Part 77 (transition
surface), the proposal is in conformance with the approved airport layout
plan and would not cause a greater adverse effect than existing obstructing
structures in the same area. As such, we have no objection to the proposal
provided the hangars are lighted with aviation red obstruction lights
in accordance with FAA Advisory'Circular 70/7460-1F (enclosed) .
Sincerely,
Mark A. Beisse
Acting Chief, Planning and
Programming Branch, ANW-610
Enclosure
cc:
Mr. Louis Gebenini
AVIATION COMMITTEE REPORT
October 12, 1981
RENTON; AVIATION, INC.
Addendum #3-81 to LAG 08-79, Addendum #2-81 - Renton Aviation has asked
to lease the portion of land that lies adjacent to its leased propertybythelWestPerimeterRoad. This is a narrow strip of land which willhavetobebuiltupandwalledtoaccommodateautomobiles. Renton
Aviation needs this additional parking space for its new facility thatisbeingbuilt. The lease contains 14,864.31 sq. ft. Because of thehighconstructioncoststoturnthisareaintoparkinglots, it wasdeterminedthatforthebalanceoftheleaseperiod, i .e. to August,1985, this area would be leased for $1 .00 per year. When the leasesarerenegotiated, the costs associated with this project will be amor-tized at the same rates the main lease pays and the rental rate forthisportionwillbere-evaluated at that time.
RECOMMENDATION
The Aviation Committee recommends that the City Council approve thisleaseandauthorizetheMayorandCityClerktosignit, subject totheapprovaloftheCityAttorney.
Richard Stredicke, Chairman
Thomas Trimm, Vice-Chairman
John Reed, Member
jt
I
I
y I
Renton City Council
10/12/81 Page 4
NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND REED, TAKE THE SUBJECT OF THE GARBAGE
Garbage Contract CONTRACT FROM .THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE AND REFER TO THE COMMITTEE
OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED.
I
n'',Committee' `Av a gppar ;=f RenCoa =AAvviiaa•t`t oa.Coma,ttee.T port
Lease Addendum -#3-81to
ii.
LAG 08-79 and Addendum 2-81. The
ortStredicker'g explained the long narrow strip adjacent to leased property
fiy the West Perimeter Road and is needed for parking, however,
Renton-Av1atioInc needs to be built up and walled to accommodate automobiles. The- .;;;..
LAG ,08779 c ittee recommended $1.00 per year for balance of the lease
Addendums#2/.#3-81 period (8/85). due to high construction costs; at time of renego7.
tiation, costs will be amortized at the same rates as the main
lease and re-evaluated. The Committee recommended the Mayor and'
City Clerk be authorized to execute lease subject to approval of',
the City Attorney,,,,;MOVED=BY.:TRIMM; SECONDED. CONCUR IN THE'
COMMITTEE_,REPORT.:_ y
Fancher Flyways Inc The Aviation Committee report recommended approval of changes of
start and completion dates of construction on LAG 06-76,- Addendum
2-81 to 3/1/82 and 9/1/82 respectively, due to high interest
rates. The Committee recommended Mayor and City Clerk be author-
ized to -sign the lease. MOVED BY REED, SECOND TRIMM, CONCUR IN
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS. CARRIED.
Aero-Dyne Corp. The Aviation Committee recommended approval of negotiated rates
Leases on three leases for Aero-Dyne _Corporation: (1) LAG 1608-69 Sup.
3-81 - Three years $.12 per sq. ft. Includes old Vocational
School Building at no additional rent for period of lease; will
be renegotiated in 1984 and re-evaluated. (2) LAG 1816-71 Supple-
ment #3-81 Three years $.12 per sq.ft. (3) Apron "C" Lease: Area
sub-leased from The Boeing Company; total amount of footage
credited to Boeing is 99,800 sq. ft. In•the new agreement Aero-
Dyne agreed to pay $.11 per sq.ft. for entire 99,800 sq.ft.;
formerly paying for 80,340. Agreement between the City and Boeing
provides Boeing with authority to give City/Aero-Dyne 90-day lease
termination notice during the three-year period. . Net increase
to Revenue on the three leases: $10,669/24 per year. The Com-
mittee recommended approval of negotiateirates on these three
leases and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign, subject
to approval of the City Attorney. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, .
CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. Committee Member Reed explained dis-
pute over inclusion of ' 'ocational School buildings which are
being- included included inground lease for thisonly8 period and will be
renegotiated in 1984. Committee Chairman Stredicke noted Boeing
has no interest in subleasing property; therefore,Committee reversed
decision, previously recommending the property return to Boeing.
MOTION CARRIED.
Airport Specialties The Committee recommended approval of Assignment of LAG 07-75
Assignments to Supplement #1-81 and LAG 08-81 Airport Specialties to_ Cedar River
Cedar River Hangar Hangar General Partnership and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk
General to sign the documents subject to approval of City Attorney and
Partnership Finance Director. The report explained leases have been signed
eq,H.l,at
V l , tb O Octo 9, 1981
OCT 2 1981 v AAA)..OFF.LCE 5E ;THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
w CITY OF RENTON
DEP0
REPORT AND DECISIf
APPLICANT: Renton Aviation FILE NO. SA-077-81
LOCATION: West side of Renton Municipal Airport at the northwest entrance
to the airport.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site approval in a P-1 zone for construction
of four airplane hangars to house private aircraft.
SUMMARY OF ACTION:Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions.
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by
REPORT: the Examiner on September 30, 1981 .
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application, and field
checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner
conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on September 22, 1981 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, requested that the hearing
be continued to October 6, 1981 to allow the City of Renton Aviation Committee the
opportunity to grant final approval of the proposal . The hearing was subsequently
continued to 9:00 a.m. on October 6, 1981 .
CONTINUANCE:
Responding to a request from the applicant, the hearing was again continued to October 20,
1981 .
CONTINUANCE:
The hearing was reopened on October 20, 1981 at 9:40 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the Planning Department preliminary report,
and entered the following exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department
report and other pertinent documents
Exhibit #2: Site Plan
Referencing the original site plan, the Examiner noted that a question had arisen regarding
whether sufficient parking space can be provided by the applicant , particularly with the
requested addition of four hangars. Mr. Blaylock advised that the Aviation Committee has
agreed to lease additional land on the west side of the West Perimeter Road, and plans
exist for construction of a two tier parking deck which would be completed along with the
expansion of the facility. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding violation of
the required setback from Rainier Avenue, Mr. Blaylock stated that no violation would
occur because setback requirements on primary state arterials have been recently modified.
The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was :
Charles Roberts
President, Renton Aviation
840 W. Perimeter Road
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Roberts submitted a letter received this date from the Federal Aviation Administration
advising approval of the subject proposal if certain conditions are met. The letter was
entered as follows by the Examiner:
Exhibit #3: Letter to Charles L. Roberts from
Mark A. Beisse, F.A.A. , undated
SA-077-81 Page Two
Mr. Roberts discussed the building setback established in the original Airport Master
Plan which coincided the lease line with the building setback a distance of 400 feet
from the centerline of the runway. Subsequently, the lease line was moved out a distance
reel. and established at 375 feet from the centerline and extended the full length
of the west side of the airport to benefit Renton Aviation, Fancher Flyways, Puget Power,
Job Master and the Boeing Company. However, at that time, no adjustment was made in the
building setback line, and Mr. Roberts indicated that application for a variance has been
made to allow construction up to the 375 foot line. The Aviation Committee of the Council ,
representatives of the Boeing Company, and the Federal Aviation Administration have shown
support for the proposal to build to the setback line, although the FAA must still issue
a final approval form. Regarding the proposed height protrusion of the structures of 10
feet, Mr. Roberts advised that no objections have been received from Boeing Company
officials if proper lighting is provided.
Parking provisions were addressed by Mr. Roberts, and it was noted that the most recent
drawing for the service facility located at the south end of the site has been reduced
in square footage, thereby reducing parking requirements. The 69 parking spaces provided
in the original proposal have been increased to 160 stalls .
Addressing the concern regarding availability of property between the current west
property line and the east line of Perimeter Road, Mr. Roberts submitted a lease agreement
which is currently in the process of approval by the City Attorney 's office prior to
execution. The lease was entered as follows:
Exhibit #4 : Lease Agreement (City of Renton to
Renton Aviation, Inc.)
Mr. Roberts indicated that a five foot side yard setback on the mutual property line
between Boeing and the applicant's property had been required during previous site
approval review, and a variance is being requested by the applicant to allow maximum
utilization of space. He noted that no objections regarding this matter have been •
received from either the city staff, the Aviation Committee or the Boeing Company
provided city codes for fire requirements are met. The original proposal had also
addressed sight problems at both the north and south entrances to the site, and as a
result, the north entrance has been eliminated entirely. The leased property line shared
with the Boeing Company bisects the south entrance, and security and gates are a
cooperative effort. Sight problems which exist in that area are a result of the original
decision of the city some years back and location of an existing fence required by the
FAA for certification. In addition, access from the subject site is to West Perimeter
road, a non-public street with a restricted speed limit, and no accidents have previously
occurred.
The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was
no response. He then invited final comments from the Planning Department staff. Mr.
Blaylock noted that the legal publication for the hearing specified only the addition
of four hangars on the site, and the authority for approval of other factors in the
site plan would be under the discretion of the Examiner.
Since no further comments were offered, the hearing regarding File No. SA-077-81 was
closed by the Examiner at 9:50 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the
Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1 . The applicant, Renton Aviation, Inc. , filed a request to construct four additional
hangars at the Renton Municipal Airport.
2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning
Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as
Exhibit #1 .
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971 , RCW 43.21C, as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has
been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) ,
responsible official .
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed.
6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity.
I
SA-077-81 Page Three
I
7. The subject property is located on the west side of the Renton Municipal Airport,
just east of the West Perimeter Road near the northwest entrance to the airport.
The property is owned by the city and leased to the applicant.
8. The applicant proposes constructing four additional hangars at the airport to house
private airplanes. In addition, parking facilities will be expanded to accommodate '
additional vehicles.
The applicant has not expanded the building complex on the subject site to the full
extent of plans approved in May of 1980 (File No. SA-038-80) , and, therefore, less
parking for that structure is required. Any additional expansion plans would have
to be reviewed to determine if sufficient parking at this location is available.
9. The Traffic Engineering Department was concerned about the access to the site from
Perimeter Road and about landscaping interfering with sight distance.
I
10. The applicant also proposed modification of the building subject to the provisions,
and a one-hour fire wall will be required. Such plans must be consistent with all
city codes :and ordinances and approved by the Fire Department.
11 . The application must be reviewed under the criteria enumerated for a conditional use
permit pursuant to Section 4-710(1 ) (I) (2) which requires a conditional use permit
for facilities constructed at the airport.
12. There havejbeen no accidents in the intersection of the subject site's access and
the airport Perimeter Road. The Perimeter Road is not a public street, but a road
which serves a municipally operated airport.
13. Certain aspects of the hangars including height and setback from the centerline
of the runways is subject to independent review by and approval of the Federal
Aviation Administration.
14.' The landscaping plans submitted by the applicant were conceptual in nature. The
plans for the concrete retaining wall will be subject to approval of the Engineering
and Building Departments.
15. The subject site is zoned P-1 (Public/Quasi-Public) and the Comprehensive Plan ,and
the Airport Master Plan indicate that airport related uses should be constructed and
contained at the perimeter of the airport.
16. The applicant has eliminated the northerly access, and thereby, the associated
sight clearance problems are an additional concern of the Traffic Engineering
Department.
CONCLUSIONS:
1 . The subject proposal appears to serve the public use and interest. The Airport
Master Plan and the Comprehensive Plan indicate that the land situated in and
around the airport should serve flight-related activities including the storage
of private; airplanes and facilities in which such planes may be serviced.
2. The plans are also subject to review and approval of the Federal Aviation
Administration, and, therefore, the location of the structures will be carefully
monitored to provide for the safety of aviation at the airport.
3. The additional ,hangars will not overcrowd this area of the airport and will serve
the growing public demand for such facilities.
4. The ongoinlg operations of the airport will not be jeopardized by the construction,
and the residents nearby should not be adversely affected by the inclusion of the
additional hangars at the Renton Airport.
5. The land at the airport is a very limited resource, and therefore, the proposal
appears toy make the best use of this resource by locating parking in a tiered
arrangement rather than spreading it over greater surface areas.
6. The applicant has eliminated the northerly access which had the sight clearance
problems, and its access has not caused any previously recorded traffic problems.
Access is onto the Perimeter Road and that road is not a public street right-of-way.
7. Subject to the approval of the appropriate city officials, the landscaping, concrete
retaining wall and other structural improvements appear satisfactory.
SA-077-81 Page Four
DECISION:
The conditional use permit and site plan are approved subject to:
1 . Approval of the concrete retaining wall by the Engineering and Building Departments.
2. Approval of the landscaping by the city's Landscape Architect.
3. Approval of the layout and location of fire-related improvements by the Fire
Department.
4. No further expansion of the complex shall be permitted without assuring that
sufficient parking is available on site.
ORDERED THIS 29th day of October, 1981 .
71-7-1
Fred J. Ka an
Land Use He ing Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of October, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party
of record:
Charles Roberts
President, Renton Aviation
840 W. Perimeter Road
Renton, WA 98055
TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of October, 1981 to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
David Clemens, Acting Planning Director
Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman
and Members, Planning Commission (9)
Ron Nelson, Building Official
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Renton Record-Chronicle
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015, of the City' s Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before November 12, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in
judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the
prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14)
days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific
errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,
take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City- Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that
such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting
other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in
the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in
said department.
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS
January 20, 1982 Renton Municipal Building
9:00 a.m. 4th Floor Conference Room
ATTENDEES: Richard Houghton, Chairman
Dave Clemens, Policy Development Director
Richard Geissler, Fire Chief
Ron Nelson, Building Official
Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer
Mike Parness, Administrative Assistant
John Webley, Parks Director
Patricia Porter, Secretary
VISITORS Chuck Roberts , Renton Aviation
1 . CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order 9:05 a.m.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Moved by NORRIS, seconded by GEISSLER, that the minutes of
the January 13, 1982 meeting be approved.
3. CORRESPONDENCE - None
4. REFERRALS FROM CITY COUNCIL - None
5. REFERRALS FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS -
a. through p. Applications For Business License Renewals. PDT Assoc. 3227 S. E. 18th
St. , CMAC, 2109 Whitman Ave. NE, Detail Body Stripes, 1425 S. Puget Dr. #310, L & L
Recoopering, 1008 Olympia Ave. NE, Harry Morrison 330 Stevens Ave. SW, Avalon Stamp
Post, 201 Union Ave. SE #140, LaValley' s Backhoe 1021 N. 35th St. , J. F. Ratcliff
3600 Meadow Ave. N. , JJ Arms 2304 NE 9th P1 . , Pacific Promotions 1216 Queen Ave. N. ,
Hair & Hand by Marji 549 Index Ave. NE, Moilanen Plumbing 214 Stevens SW, R BY R
Repairs 3607 NE 12th St. , Kennydale Lawn 2525 Aberdeen Ave. NE, Hour Glass Etc. 2020
Grant Ave. SE #E102, Art' s Arts 1555 Union Ave. NE #27. Moved by NELSON, seconded
by GEISSLER, that all renewal applications be approved. MOTION CARRIED
Schultek Assoc. 613 Grant Ave. S. This license denial was brought up by Mr. Nelson
who explained that this party had submitted two licenses. One was denied because
it was a warehouse-type business and a subsequent appeal was denied. The second
application was to be for a Amway-type business which was what the Board denied at
the previous meeting. Moved by CLEMENS, seconded by NORRIS, that the Board re-
consider the Schultek application and ask them to send a detailed letter explaining
what their home occupation will actually be. MOTION CARRIED
q. Deferral of Parking Improvements, Renton Aviation Hangar Expansion, 840 Perimeter
Rd. Chuck Roberts of Renton Aviation explained that the construction of a new
hangar was scheduled for completion the 7th of February and before they can
obtain an occupancy they need to provide parking facilities. Also, he indicated
they have adequate parking, i .e. , around 110-120 parking stalls at present. He
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS 2- January 20, 1982
went on to explain that where they would have to install parking facilities
now under the requirements of the occupancy permit, would have to be removed
at a later date because of further new construction. He asked for the
deferral as a natural progression of their expansion. Chairman Houghton read
responses from Traffic Engineering and Design Engineering who had no objection
to this request. MOVED by CLEMENS, SECONDED by NELSON, the the requested
deferral of 14 parking stalls (required by occupancy) be approved for a period
of one year subject to a bond being posted. MOTION CARRIED
6. NEW BUSINESS - None
7. OLD BUSINESS
a. Letter from the Austin Co. Chairman Houghton read the Austin Co's response
to the Board's letter of January 6, 1982 requesting installation of off-site
improvements to Valley Office Complex I which stated in part . . ."Boeing Co. has
not renewed its lease so there is no need for the lot. We will block off the
entrances. . .". Moved by CLEMENS, seconded by NELSON, the the Austin Company
be requested to block the entrances in a manner such to be approved by the
Traffic Engineering Division, and as soon as that is accomplished and approved,
the bond will be returned. Also to remove the improvements. MOTION CARRIED.
b. Letter from the First Interstate Bank re Sea Galley Stores. Letter informed
the Board that First Interstate Bank is the primary bank for Sea Galley and
they will be issuing a letter of credit to replace letter of credit the City
holds issued on Rainier Bank.
8. COMMENTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: Gary Norris questioned meandering sidewalks on the
Springbrook Technical Center plans (Holvik). Discussion ensued. No Board Action.
Ron Nelson indicated that he had a request from OW Properties to install the fill
on Oaksdale Ave. S.W. which the Board had granted them the right to do two years
ago. Ron stated that now the City has a flood program and a fill program that are
quite different from two years ago and asked for input from the Board. The members
discussed this and it was decided that Ron Nelson would distribute all information
available for further discussion and review.
9. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 9:40 a.m.
Patricia M. Porter
Secretary
APPROVED:
Date
b
CITY OF RENTON Date : 1/8/82
JAN 81982
POLICY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS REFERRAL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1982
0 Dave Clemens
Ron Nelson
John Webley
iDick Geissler
TO: Don Monaghan
Gary Norris
SUBJECT: Deferral of Parking Improvements - Renton Aviation Hangar Expansion
840 W. Perimeter Rd. - Requesting delay of 12 mos. in implementation
of parking plans. Plans available in Public Works Admin. Office.
COMMENTS:'
Please return comments to secretary for the January 20th meeting.
CITY OF RENTON
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS
APPLICATION FOR APPEAL
DATE OF FILING 1/5/82 GRANTED
DENIED
DATE OF HEARING APPEALEDHEARING
1 . NAME OF APPLICANT Renton Aviation, Inc.. 255-1422
Please Print Telephone Number
2. ADDRESS 840 W. Perimeter Rd.Renton, Wash. 98055
3. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY INVOLVED Same as Above
4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF
PROPERTY INVOLVED: LOT DNA BLOCK DNA PLAT Lease LAG 08-79
5. NAME Of PROJECT/PLAT - DNA e,IbniAV/AT/ON NANgA,e e*IiJN.S/ON ''
5. PRESENT ZONING: P-I
7. EXACT VARIANCE REQUESTED Request delay of 12 mos. in implementation of
parking plans
8. WHY CAN'T THE PROPERTY BE DEVELOPED WITHIN THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINANCE?
Implementation of parking improvements required for occupancy of 1st phase
1st row of hangars) of construction not possible at this time due to additional
construction required to prepare site for parking - this construction to be done
with phase for building in next 12 mos. We currently have parking for over 100 cars.
9. WHAT SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES OR CONDITIONS APPLY TO SUBJECT PROPERTY WHICH AREPECULIARTOSUCHPROPERTYANDDONOTAPPLYGENERALLYTOPROPERTYINNEIGHBORHOOD?
DNA
10. IS THE VARIANCE REQUESTED THE MINIMUM VARIANCE NECESSARY TO ALLOW THE REASONABLEUSEOFTHEfROPERTY? Yes
11 . WILL THE GRANTED OF THE REQUESTED VARIANCE BE IN HARMONY WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF
SURROUNDINGI PROPERTY AND NOT INJURIOUS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR DETRIMENTAL TO THEPUBLICWELFARE? Yes
1
I DECLARE THAT I AM THE OWNER/AGENT OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION
AND THAT THE FOREGOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE INFORMATIONHEREINSUBMITTEDAREINALLRESPECTSTRUEANDCORCTTOTHBESiKNOWLEDGEANDBELIEF.
S TU ELOFR ANT
4/15/81
ti
OF I
THE CITY OF RENTONft$
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
o o BARBARA•. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR m LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ,
FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593
OR
TED SEP110'
November 16, .1981
Mr. ,Charles Roberts
President, Renton Aviation
840 'W. Perimeter Road
Renton, WA 98055
RE: File No. SA-077-81 ; Renton Aviation; Site Approval .
Dear Mr. Roberts:
The ,Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was
published on October 29, 1981 has not been appealed within the 14-day
period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered
final and is being transmitted to the Planning Department this date
for ,filing.
Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or
information is required.
Sincerely,
Fred J. Kau man
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department
CITY OF HEN DN No. 20379
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 W go 19 /
cuLi—CEIV` _ED OF
IA, PTV I 2,ti 1,-,A., tTeet-4
o/ .7 - e
4 . i /
7-/-fi--a/ 6 0
TOTAL 72 U
GWEN E. MARSH ,
j.
F NANCE DIRECTOR
BY
1 I
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King
Marilyn J . Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath
disposes and states:
That on the 29th day of October 19 81 , affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a , sealed envelope containing
a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the
parties of record in the below entitled application or petition.
Od7
th 1
Subscribed and sworn this .2 day of 10C O V er 19 V1 •
LCI106,_ '"Y\ • k
Notary Public in and for the at of
Washington, residing at v)oh
Application, Petition or Case: Renton Aviation; SA-077-81
The minute's contain a .?.fist o6 the pa vtLes 04 necond. )
1
October 29, 1981
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND DECISION .
APPLICANT: Renton Aviation FILE NO. SA-077-81
LOCATION: West side of Renton Municipal Airport at the northwest entrance
to the airport.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site approval in a P-1 zone for construction
of four airplane hangars to house private aircraft.
SUMMARY. OF ACTION:Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions.
1 Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by
REPORT: the Examiner on September 30, 1981 .
PUBLIC HEARING,:. After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application, and field
checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner
conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing wa!s opened on September 22, 1981 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, requested that the hearing
be continued to October 6, 1981 to allow the City of Renton Aviation Committee the
opportunity to grant final approval of the proposal . The hearing was subsequently
continued to 91:00 a.m. on October 6, 1981 .
CONTINUANCE:
Responding to is request, from the applicant, the hearing was again continued to October 20,
1981 .
1
CONTINUANCE:
The hearing was reopened on October 20, 1981 at 9:40 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
1
Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the Planning Department preliminary report,
and entered the following exhibits into the record:
1 Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department
report and other pertinent documents
Exhibit #2: Site Plan
Referencing the original site plan, the Examiner noted that a question had arisen regarding
whether sufficient parking space can be provided by the applicant, particularly with the
requested addition of four hangars. Mr. Blaylock advised that the Aviation Committee has
agreed to lease additional land on the west side of the West Perimeter Road, and plans
exist for construction of a two tier parking deck which would be completed along with the
expansion of the facility. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding violation of
the required setback from Rainier Avenue, Mr. Blaylock stated that no violation would
occur because setback requirements on primary state arterials have been recently modified.
The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was:
Charles Roberts
President, Renton Aviation
840 W. Perimeter Road
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Roberts submitted a letter received this date from the Federal Aviation Administration
advising approval of the subject proposal if certain conditions are met. The letter was
entered as follows by the Examiner:
Exhibit #3: Letter to Charles L. Roberts from
Mark A. Beisse, F.A.A. , undated
I
V
SA-077-81 Page Two
Mr. Roberts discussed the building setback established in the original Airport Master
Plan which coincided the lease line with the building setback a distance of 400 feet •
from the centerline of the runway. Subsequently, the lease line was moved out a distance
of t; Feel and established at 375 feet from the centerline and extended the full length
of the west side of the airport to benefit Renton Aviation, Fancher Flyways, Puget Power,
Job Master and the Boeing Company. However, at that time, no adjustment was made in the
building setback line, and Mr. Roberts indicated that application for a variance has been
made to allow construction up to the 375 foot line. The Aviation Committee of the Council ,
representatives of the Boeing Company, and the Federal Aviation Administration have shown
support for the proposal to build to the setback line, although the FAA must still issue
a final approval form. Regarding the proposed height protrusion of the structures of 10
feet, Mr. Roberts advised that no objections have been received from Boeing Company
officials if proper lighting is provided.
Parking provisions were addressed by Mr. Roberts, and it was noted that the most recent
drawing for the service facility located at the south end of the site has been reduced
in square footage, thereby reducing parking requirements. The 69 parking spaces provided
in the original proposal have been increased to 160 stalls.
Addressing the concern regarding availability of property between the current west
property line and the east line of Perimeter Road, Mr. Roberts submitted a lease agreement
which is currently in the process of approval by the City Attorney's office prior to
execution. The lease was entered as follows:
Exhibit #4: Lease Agreement (City of Renton to
Renton Aviation, Inc.)
Mr. Roberts indicated that a five foot side yard setback on the mutual property line
between Boeing and the applicant' s property had been required during previous site
approval review, and a variance is being requested by the applicant to allow maximum
utilization of space. He noted that no objections regarding this matter have been
received from either the city staff,. the Aviation Committee or the Boeing Company
provided city codes for fire requirements are met. The original proposal had also
addressed sight problems at both the north and south entrances to the site, and as a
result, the north entrance has been eliminated entirely. The leased property line shared
with the Boeing Company bisects the south entrance, and security and gates are a
cooperative effort. Sight problems which exist in that area are a result of the original
decision of the city some years back and location of an existing fence required by the
FAA for certification. In addition, access from the subject site is to West Perimeter
road, a non-public street with a restricted speed limit, and no accidents have previously
occurred.
The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was
no response. He then invited final comments from the Planning Department staff. Mr.
Blaylock noted that the legal publication for the hearing specified only the addition
of four hangars on the site, and the authority for approval of other factors in the
site plan would be under the discretion of the Examiner.
Since no further comments were offered, the hearing regarding File No. SA-077-81 was
closed by the Examiner at 9:50 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the
Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1 . The applicant, Renton Aviation, Inc. , filed a request to construct four additional
hangars at the Renton Municipal Airport. •
2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning
Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as
Exhibit #1 .
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971 , RCW 43.21C, as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has
ibeen issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) ,
responsible official .
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed.
6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity.
n R
SA-077-81 Page Three
7. The subject property is located on the west side of the Renton Municipal Airport,
just east of the West Perimeter Road near the northwest entrance to the airport.
The property is owned by the city and leased to the applicant.
8. The applicant proposes constructing four additional hangars at the airport to house
private airplanes. In addition, parking facilities will be expanded to accommodate
additional vehicles.
The applicant has not expanded the building complex on the subject site to the full
extent of plans approved in May of 1980 (File No. SA-038-80) , and, therefore, less
parking for that structure is required. Any additional expansion plans would have
to be reviewed to determine if sufficient parking at this location is available.
9. The Traffic Engineering Department was concerned about the access to the site from
Perimeter Road and about landscaping interfering with sight distance.
10. The applicant also proposed modification of the building subject to the provisions,
and a one-Hour fire wall will be required. Such plans must be consistent with all .
city codes and ordinances and approved by the Fire Department.
11 . The application must be reviewed under the criteria enumerated for a conditional use
permit pursuant to Section 4-710(1 ) (I) (2) which requires a conditional use permit
for facilities constructed at the airport.
12. There haveibeen no accidents in the intersection of the subject site's access and
the airport Perimeter Road. The Perimeter Road is not a public street, but a road
which serves a municipally operated airport.
13. Certain aspects of the hangars including height and setback from the centerline
of the runways is subject to independent review by and approval of the Federal
Aviation Administration.
14. The landscaping plans submitted by the applicant were conceptual in nature. The
plans for the concrete retaining wall will be subject to approval of the Engineering
and Building Departments.
15. The subject' site is zoned P-1 (Public/Quasi-Public) and the Comprehensive Plan and
the Airport Master Plan indicate that airport related uses should be constructed and
contained at the perimeter of the airport.
16. The applicant has eliminated the northerly access, and thereby, the associated
sight clearance problems are an additional concern of the Traffic Engineering
Department.!
CONCLUSIONS: 1
1 . The subject proposal appears to serve the public use and interest. The Airport
Master Plan' and the Comprehensive Plan indicate that the land situated in and
around the ',airport should serve flight-related activities including the storage
of privatelairplanes and facilities in which such planes may be serviced.
2. The plans are also subject to review and approval of the Federal Aviation
Administration, and, therefore, the location of the structures will be carefully
monitored t;o provide for the safety of aviation at the airport.
3. The additional hangars will not overcrowd this area of the airport and will serve
the growing public demand for such facilities.
4. The ongoing operations of the airport will not be jeopardized by the construction,
and the residents nearby should not be adversely affected by the inclusion of the
additional hangars at the Renton Airport.
5. The land at the airport is a very limited resource, and therefore, the proposal
appears to make the best use of this resource by locating parking in a tiered
arrangement, rather than spreading it over greater surface areas.
6. The applicajnt has eliminated the northerly access which had the sight clearance
problems, and its access has not caused any previously recorded traffic problems.
Access is onto the Perimeter Road and that road is not a public street right-of-way.
7. Subject to the approval of the appropriate city officials, the landscaping, concrete
retaining wall and other structural improvements appear satisfactory.
1
SA-077-81 Page Four
DECISION:
The conditional use permit and site plan are approved subject to:
1 . Approval of the concrete retaining wall by the Engineering and Building Departments.
2. Approval of the landscaping by the city's Landscape Architect.
3. Approval of the layout and location of fire-related improvements by the Fire
Department.
4. No further expansion of the complex shall be permitted without assuring that
sufficient parking is available on site.
ORDERED THIS 29th day of October, 1981 .
1'- j
Fred J. Ka an
Land Use He ing Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of October, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party
of record:
Charles Roberts
President, Renton Aviation
840 W. Perimeter Road
Renton, WA 98055
TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of October, 1981 to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
David Clemens, Acting Planning Director
Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman
and Members, Planning Commission (9)
Ron Nelson, Building Official
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Renton Record-Chronicle
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before November 12, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in
judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the
prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14)
days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific
errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,
take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that
such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting
other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in
the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in •
said department:
n,
v
RECEIVED
IdendumeoWJ gEFt, N-
co-,79
ITEM O. 077-70
LEASE AGREEMENT OCT 9
AM PM
City of Renton to Renton Aviation, Inc.) 7'8°9r10°lI°l2W21 io4o.SiFi
Al
THIS ADDENDUM #3-81 TO LAG 08-79, effective as of October 1 , 1981 , and LAG 08-79,
Addendum #2-81 , effective as of August 1 , 1980, is executed in triplicate by and
between the City of Renton, a municipal corporation, and Renton Aviation, Inc. , a
Washington corporation, hereafter referred to as the LESSOR and LESSEE, respectively:
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS the above parties have heretofore entered into and executed a certain
Lease and Addendum, identified above, further reference being had thereto, and
WHEREAS it is necessary and advisable to add certain properties to said lease
for the purpose of building parking lots for automobiles,
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed and covenanted by and between the parties
as follows:
1 . It is is hereby agreed Lessor does hereby lease and demise unto Lessee the
following described parcels of real estate accepted by the Lessee in their "as-is"
condition, being located within the confines of the Renton Municipal Airport, Renton,
King County; Washington, to-wit:
Beginning at a point located on the Renton Airfield Runway Centerline
referred to as Station 0+00; thence N 49°49'43" W a distance of 4,272.63
feet; thence S 85°10'17" W a distance of 375 feet; thence S 84°50 '50" W
a distance of 373.05 feet to the true point of beginning; thence S 84°50 '50" W
a distance of 15 feet; thence N 1°39 '08" W a distance of 200. 76 feet; thence
N 1°31 '31" W a distance of158.68 feet; thence N 4°50'12" E a distance of
152.05 feet; thence N 11°15'10" E a distance of 119.09 feet; thence N 17°05'45" .E
a distance of 104. 65 feet; thence S 11°36'50" W a distance of 103.95 feet;
thence S 47°47'54" E a distance of 11.96 feet; thence S 57°51 '56" E a dis-
tance of 1.96 feet; thence S 9°41 '17" W a distance of 89.27 feet; thence
S 4°53'45" W a distance of 149. 26 feet; thence S 1°31 '17" W a distance of
159.48 feet; thence S 00°10 '25" W a distance of 90. 06 feet; thence S 2°05'50" W
a distance of 109. 27 feet to the true point of beginning.
Area = 14,864. 31 Square Feet - See Map Plan of Area attached as Exhibit "B".
2. As rental for the above-described property during the term of Addendum
2-81 to LAG 08-79 and ending on August 1 , 1985, Lessee shall pay unto Lessor a
yearly rental of One Dollar ($1 .00). payable upon execution of this Addendum. It
is understood rand agreed that this token lease payment will be renegotiated, along
with Addendum #2-81 to LAG 08-79 in 1985. This token rental is based on the costs
1
associated with the improvement of said property being borne by the Lessee and amor-
tized at the same rates that Addendum #2-81 to LAG 08-79 is charged through July 31 ,
1985 and is subject to Paragraph 17 of LAG 08-79 as amended , by LAG 08-79, Addendum
2-81 .
3. Paragraph 3 of LAG 08-79, as amended by Addendum #1-81 to LAG 08-79,
is hereby amended by adding a sub-paragraph c. as follows:
c. The premises described in Paragraph 1 of this Addendum will be
used for the purpose of parking cars in connection with Renton Aviation's facility
and will be developed for that purpose only. All plans and specifications shall
have the prior written approval ofLessor and all construction shall be in full
compliance with all applicable City Codes, ordinances and regulations pertaining
to such work',. Lessee shall promptly repair and/or replace any and all damages
to any utility lines or roadways in connection with any such construction. In
addition, when the plans and specifications are completed, they will become an
exhibit to this supplement and all costs for this construction will be segregated
from any other constructions costs for the facilities being built on the Airport.
This is for the purpose of amortizing the costs over the period of this supplement.
If the costs are completely amortized at the time the lease is to be renegotiated
in August, 1985, then this property will be included in the main lease at the same
rates as the' rest of the property leased by Renton Aviation, Inc.
4. All other provisions of the originalginal lease LAG 08-79 shall remain in
full force and effect.
RENTON AVIATION, INC. , a Washington CITY OF RENTON, a Municipal Corporation
Corporation
Mayor
LESSEE City Clerk LESSOR
Approved as to legal form:
City Attorney
of T NSP
4 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
o z
NORTHWEST REGION
FO
FAA BUILDING KING COUNTY INT'LAIRPORT
SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 88108
SATES 01 P-
Mr. Charles.L. Roberts
Renton Aviation Inc.
840 West Perimeter Road
Renton, WA 96055
Dear Mr. Roberts:
We have reviewed your proposal to construct four rows of aircraft hangars
and expand the existing service hangar 375 feet abeam Runway 15/33 centerline
at RentonlMunicipal Airport. Although the structures as proposed would
exceed the standards of Federal Aviation Regulation Part 77 (transition
surface) , Ithe proposal is in conformance with the approved airport layout
plan and Would not cause a greater adverse effect than existing obstructing
structures in the same area. As such, we have no objection to the proposal
provided the hangars are lighted with aviation red obstruction lights
in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460-1F (enclosed).
Sincerely,
Mark A. Beisse
Acting Chief, .Planning and
Programming Branch, ANW-610
Enclosure!
RECEIVED
cc:CITY OF RENTONMr. Louis! Gebenini HEARING EXAMINER
OCT 2 ; 1981
AM
Q p Q x ry A
PM
6 I8191tUID1lf6 Fi C O5e3F04g5t6
X H 'r
y:
ITEM NO0
1
AVIATION COMMITTEE REPORT
October 12, 1981.
RENTON AVIATION, INC.
Addendum #3-81 to LAG 08-79, Addendum #2-81 - Renton Aviation has asked
to lease the portion of land that lies adjacent to its leased propertybythe' West Perimeter Road. This is a narrow strip of land which willhavetobebuiltupandwalledtoaccommodateautomobiles. Renton
Aviation needs this additional parking space for its new facility thatisbeingbuilt. The lease contains 14,86 .31 sq. ft. Because of thehighconstructioncoststoturnthisareaintoparkinglots, it wasdeterminedthatforthebalanceoftheleseperiod, i .e. to August,1985, this area would be leased for $1 .00 per year. When the leasesarerenegotiated, the costs associated wi h this project will be amor-
tized at the same rates the main lease pays and the rental rate for
this portion will be re-evaluated at that time.
RECOMMENDATION
The Aviation Committee recommends that the City Council approve thisleaseandauthorizetheMayorandCityClerktosignitsubjectto
the approval of the City Attorney.
Richar Stredicke, Chairman
Thomas Trirtm, Vice-Chairman
John R-'ed, Member
jt
I
I
Renton City Council
10/12/81 Page 4
NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND REED, "AKE THE SUBJECT OF THE GARBAGE
Garbage Contract CONTRACT FROM .THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE AND REFER TO THE COMMITTEE
OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED.
r^.`',x?='^""i""'"`.":i' '.
M•-;,•--:.ay.. —:'i'$.._-='
ens"`%':
v..}.,wa..Y
i.-.-o-r• ,;
t,.
Av at3ont;Comm ttee;.r i tion_Committee;Yepor recammensiedl:appXai1a] of-Renton=Avist on`
Chairman:Iti-:-Lease Addendum #3-81"to LAG 08-79 and Addendum 2-81. The
Stredicke a ort explained the long narrow strip adjacent to leased property
by the West Perimeter Road and is needed for•parking, however,
Renton Av3at n.Inc needs to be built up and walled to accommodate automobiles. The ::
committee recommended $1.00 ptr year for balance of the lease
Addendums#2/#3-8:1 period (8/85): due to high con truction costs; at time of renego-
tiation, costs will be amortised at the same rates as the main
lease and re-evaluated. The Committee recommended the Mayor ands,
City Clerk be authorized to ececute lease subject to approval of
the, City Attorney,, ,M OVED,:BYIMM<TR SECOND„REED CONCUR IN
COMMITTEE REPORT:,:;
Fancher Flyways Inc The Aviation Committee report recommended approval of changes of
start and completion dates of construction on LAG 06-76, Addendum
1 2-81 to 3/1/82 and 9/1/82 re pectively, due to high interest
rates. The Committee recomme ded Mayor and City Clerk be author-
ized to sign the lease. MOV BY REED, SECOND TRIMM, CONCUR IN
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS. CARRIED.
Aero-Dyne Corp. The Aviation Committee recomm nded approval of negotiated rates
Leases on three leases for Aero-Dyne Corporation: (1) LAG 1608-69 Sup.
1 3-81 - Three years $.12 per q. ft. Includes old Vocational
School Building at no additional rent for period of lease; will
be renegotiated in 1984 and re-evaluated. (2) LAG 1816-71 Supple-
ment #3-81 Three years $.12 p1r sq.ft. (3) Apron "C" Lease: Area
sub-leased from The Boeing Co pany; total amount of footage
credited to Boeing is 99,800 q. ft. In•the new agreement Aero-
D e agreed toDyneg pay $.11 per sq.ft. for entire 99,800 sq.ft. ;
formerly paying for 80,340. Agreement between the City and Boeing
provides Boeing with authority to give City/Aero-Dyne 90-day lease
termination notice during the three-year period. . Net increase
to Revenue on the three lease : $10,669/24 per year. The Com-
mittee recommended approval o .negotiatedrates on these three
leases and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign, subject
to approval of the City Attorney. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER,
CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. Co mittee Member Reed explained dis-
pute over inclusion of "/ocatibnal School buildings which are
being included in ground lease for this period only and will be
renegotiated in 1984. Committee Chairman Stredicke noted Boeing
has no interest in subleasing property; therefore,Committee reversed
decision, previously recommen.ing the property return to Boeing.
MOTION CARRIED.
Airport ,Specialties The Committee recommended app oval of Assignment of LAG 07-75
Assignments to Supplement #1-81 and LAG 08-8 Airport Specialties to Cedar River
Cedar River Hangar Hangar General Partnership an. authorize the Mayor and City Clerk
General to sign the documents subject to approval of City Attorney and
Partnership Finance Director. The report explained leases have been signed
Renton City Council
10/12/81 Page 4
NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND REED, TAKE THE SUBJECT OF THE GARBAGE
Garbage Contract CONTRACT FROM THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE AND REFER TO THE COMMITTEE
OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED.
Aviation Committee Aviation Committee report recommended approval of Renton Aviation,
Chairman: Inc. Lease Addendum #3-81 to LAG 08-79 and Addendum 2-81. The
Stredicke report explained the long narrow strip adjacent to leased property
by the West Perimeter Road and is needed for parking, however,
Renton Aviation Inc needs to be built up and walled to accommodate automobiles. The
LAG 08-79 committee recommended $1.00 per year for balance of the lease .. _
Addendums#2/#3-81 period (8/85) due to high construction costs; at time of renego-
tiation, costs will be amortized at the same rates as the main
lease and re-evaluated. The Committee recommended the Mayor and
City Clerk be authorized to execute lease subject to approval of
the City Attorney. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND REED, CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Fancher Flyways Inc The Aviation Committee report recommended approval of changes of
start and completion dates of construction on LAG 06-76, Addendum
2-81 to 3/1/82 and 9/1/82 respectively, due to high interest
rates. The Committee recommended Mayor and City Clerk be author-
ized to sign the lease. MOVED BY REED, SECOND TRIMM, CONCUR IN
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS. CARRIED.
Aero-Dyne Corp. The Aviation Committee recommended approval of negotiated rates
Leases on three leases for Aero-Dyne Corporation: (1) LAG 1608-69 Sup.
3-81 - Three years $.12 per sq. ft. Includes old Vocational
School Building at no additional rent for period of lease; will
be renegotiated in 1984 and re-evaluated. (2) LAG 1816-71 Supple-
ment #3-81 Three years $.12 per sq.ft. (3) Apron "C" Lease: Area
sub-leased from The Hoeing Company; total amount of footage
credited to Boeing is 99,800 sq. ft. In the new agreement Aero-
Dyne agreed to pay $.11 per sq.ft. for entire 99,800 sq.ft. ;
formerly paying for 80,340. Agreement between the City and Boeing
provides Boeing with authority to give City/Aero-Dyne 90-day lease
termination notice during the three-year period. Net increase
to Revenue on the three leases: $10,669/24 per year. The Com-
mittee recommended approval ot. negotiateirates on these three
leases and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign, subject
to approval of the City Attorney. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER,
CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. Committee Member Reed explained dis-
pute over inclusion of vocational School buildings which are
being included in ground lease for this period only and will be
renegotiated in 1984. Committee Chairman Stredicke noted Boeing
has no interest in subleasing property; therefore, Committee reversed
decision, previously recommending the property return to Boeing.
MOTION CARRIED.
Airport Specialties The Committee recommended approval of Assignment of LAG 07-75
Assignments to Supplement #1-81 and LAG 08-81 Airport Specialties to Cedar River
Cedar River Hangar Hangar General Partnership and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk
General to sign the documents subject to approval of City Attorney and
Partnership Finance Director. The report explained leases have been signed
by Bernell Guthmiller dba Airport Specialties, all retroactive
rental payments made, personal financial statement submitted by
Guthmiller who will be held liable in cause of default by the
partnership. MOVED BY REED, SECOND TRIMM, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
Aid Service Mayor Pro tem Stredicke inquired regarding the elimination of the
Renton Highlands Aid Unit from the Highlands. Fire Chief Geissler explained the
change made in serving the area only deletes ability to transport.
Stredicke questioned the need to roll two vehicles and the Fire
Chief advised both aid car and pumper respond from Station 12 as
the manpower is needed, that in the event of another emergency,
downtown covers. Stredicke requested cost breakdown. Geissler
explained the private ambulance companies do transporting to
hospital and have ten minute response.
Renton City Council
10/12/81 Page 3
Consent Agenda - Continued
Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by Rufus Commodore, 520 Taylor P1. NW,
Commodore in amount yet unknown for damage to yard by cave in, alleging
water ran out of the street causing damage. Refer to City Attorney
and Insurance Carrier.
Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by Stephen E. Eastman, 317 Powell Ave
Eastman SW, in amount of $1,646.90 for damage to basement of his home
alleging sewer backed up. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance
Carrier.
Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA AS
Approved PRESENTED. CARRIED.
Recess MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES.
CARRIED. 9:35 P.M. Council reconvened at 9:45 P.M. All Council
Members were present at Roll Call. Mayor Shinpoch left the meet-
ing and Council President Stredicke assumed the Chair as Mayor
Pro tem.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee
Committee report recommending first reading of an ordinance changing the
First Reading
zoning classification from G to B-1 for property located 300 feet
Stewart Rezone
north of NE Sunset Blvd on the west side of Duvall Ave. NE.
known as the Vincent Stewart Rezone R-067-81. MOVED BY CLYMER+
SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COM-
MITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. Mayor Pro tem Stredicke inquired re Build-
ing Moratorium and concerning referral of 10/5/81; Committee
advised rezone only under consideration. MOTION CARRIED.
Resolution #2424 The Committee recommended reading and adoption of a resolution
Water/Sewer/Street declaring intent to construct and install roadway, including
LID #325 Davis So. curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paving, drainage, watermain, street
Public Hearing lights, sanitary sewers and appurtenances in an near area
11/16/81 south of South 43rd St. and east of SR 167, including Davis Avenue
South, and set Public Hearing 11/16/81. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND
HUGHES, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution #2425 The Committee recommended reading and adoption of a resolution
Fund Transfer for transfer of funds in amount of $58,225 for (1) 2% salary
2% Salary Increase, increase 7/1/81 for Management and 21R employees; (2) Municipal
Planning/Building Court typewriter replacement; (3) Increase Court part-time salaries
Reorganization and benefits; (4) Fund Intern through 1981 (Executive Administra-
Interns tion) ; (5) Redistribute Planning Dept. salaries and benefits into
Housekeeping proper accounts, increase overtime and fund Intern through 1981;
6) Fund Planning/Building reorganization; (7) Increase Civil
Service Commission Budgetary accounts due to Police Chief recruit-
ment. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS
PRESENTED. Mayor Pro tem Stredicke objected for the record, materials
requested last week for details of the transfer had been promised
but not distributed to him. MOTION CARRIED.
Resolution #2426 The Committee recommended reading and adoption of a resolution to
Utility Facilities authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute quit claim deed and
SR 515 agreement and quit claim deed regarding SR 515 Carr Road to Puget
Drive utility facilities. (See earlier Consent Agenda Items Page 2) .
Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT
THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
Vouchers for The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval for payment of
Payment Vouchers No. 35944 through No. 36197 in the amount of $801,748.77
plus LID #322 Revenue Warrant R-8 in amount of $270.81, having
received Departmental certification that merchandise/services
received. Machine Voids: 35939 - 35943. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND
ROCKHILL, ACCEPT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION AND AUTHORIZE PAYMENT
OF VOUCHERS. CARRIED.
P 41ationin .
Il
AIRCRAFT LAND AND SEA BASE
1 840 W. PERIMETER RD. • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • PHONE(206)255-1422
October 5 , 1981
1
Mr. Fred Kaufman
Land Use Hearing Examiner
City of Renton
200 Mill Ave.
Renton, Wash. 98055
Re: October 6th Hearing
Dear Mr. Kaufman,
We regretfully request a continuence of the
October 6th hearing to October 20th, if your schedule
permits . We are requesting additional time to resolve
the most recent questions relative to our project from
the Building and Planning Department.
1
Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly
appreciated.
Thank you.
d
Sincerely,
Charles L. Roberts , President
Renton Aviation, Inc.
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
OCT 5 1981
AM i
y 1819110111Q 11,.: ti't2;3-1 i5:6
I AUTHORIZED Cessna® DEALER
SALES / SERVICE / PARTS / CHARTER % FLIGHT TRAINING
OF R
14,
0 ®
t z' THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
am= BARBARA`. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR . • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER0.
0 o
FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593
9
FD SEP
September 18, 1981
TO: j Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner
FROM.: ,1 Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner
RE: File No: SA-077-81 ; Renton Aviation
This Better is in response to your memorandum,. dated September 18, 1981 .
Section 4-3012 -requires •a .written report and recommendation by the
Planning Department prior to the public hearing. 'The report permits
all parties., including members of the public and the applicant, an
opportunity to review the proposal . The report also informs the
Examiner of the request and permits the formulation of questions
pertailningto the request.
This office has maintained the continued policy of holding a public
hearing only after receiving the required report per ordinance
standards and this policy will be maintained in this case. The item
may be continued to the next ,available hearing date without :further
public notice.
If this office can be 'of` further assistance, please to not hesitate to
call .
Scc:. Mayor
City Attorney 3‘1n.r "" a 1
Members, E.R.C.
1.1,_
Fenton Aviation, Inc.
w `
f
Will@ al I _
titartom
AIRCRAFT LAND AND SEA BASE
840 W. PERIMETER RD. • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • PHONE(206)255-1422
September 18, 1981
Mr:Fred Kaufman
Land Use Hearing Examiner
City of Renton
200Mil1 Ave.
Renton, Wash. 98055
Re: Renton Aviation Site Plan
Dear Mr. Kaufman,
Renton Aviation requests the hearing scheduled for
September 22, 1981 be held as planned. We waive our right
to seven days advance notice, in writing, of the staff
report. The staff report can be verbal in reply to presenta-
tions by Charles L. Roberts of Renton Aviation and Louis Gebinini,
Airport Director.
The record can be left for seven (7) working days for staff
comments and comments from any other interested individuals.
Sincer ///
2 /.////)
CSC 6 ) i, C
Charles L. Roberts, President
Renton Aviation, Inc.
CR/db
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
SEP i. 8 1981
AM PM
718191i0d11121 P 1213,4i56
AUTHORIZED Cessna. DEALER
SALES / SERVICE / PARTS / CHARTER / FLIGHT TRAINING
R4iatioH INC. r3cr
AIRCRAFT LAND AND SEA BASE r--
840 W. PERIMETER RD. • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • PHONE(206)25 -1422 "•-• 1 5 7%8,1
September 15, 1981
47
Mr. Dave Clemens
Planning Director
City of Renton
200 Mill Ave.
Renton, Wash. 98055
Re: File No. SA-038-80 - Renton Aviation; Site Approval
Dear Mr. Clemens,
We are re-submitting our building plans for the hearing examiner as
per your request. There have been some changes made to improve our site
plan.
We have obtained preliminary approval for leasing additional space for
parking between Perimeter Road and the current West lease line designated by
the security fencing. This is indicated by the minutes of the last Airport
Board Meeting. This adds to our available parking.
We have eliminated the North entrance, thereby eliminating the site
distance problem addressed in your previous report.
Our Southmost entrance will now become our primary entrance. I would
point out that we share this entrance with the Boeing Company. Neither of
us can close the other out, as the gate is exactly in the middle of our
mutual lease line.
Your last opinion expressed a minimum requirement of 69 parking stalls.
We now have 160 available parking spaces. We feel this is a significant
improvement. We also would point out that no parking should be required for
hangars or aircraft tiedown, as the aircraft owner will park his car where
his aircraft is parked, prior to departure.
We estimate approximately two years for completion of the entire project.
We are now awaiting a Building Permit for the first row of hangars we felt
were covered in our original proposal. Your prompt attention to this matter
is greatly appreciated.
Thank you very much.
Si y, 1U
15(cza 4PAPTO
Charles L. Roberts, President
Renton Aviation, Inc.
AUTHORIZED Cessna. DEALER
SALES / SERVICE / PARTS / CHARTER / FLIGHT TRAINING
e '
n
rLANNING DEPARTMENTT
PRELIMINARY REPORT ' THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
OCTOBER 6 , 1981
APPLICANT: RENTON AVIATION
FILE NUMBER: SA-077-81
A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF
The applicant seeks site approval in a P-1 zone for
construction of 4 airplane hangars to house private
aircraft.
B. GENERAL INFO 1TION:
1 . Owner of Record: CITY OF RENTON
2. Applicant : RENTON AVIATION
Owned by Robertson
Aircraft
3. Location:
Vicinity Map Attached) West side of Renton
Municipal Airport
at the northwest
entrance to the airport
4 . Legal Description: A detailed legal
description is available
on file in the Renton
Planning Department.
5. Size of Property: 6. 03 acres
6 . Access :Via Rainier Avenue
North
7. Existing Zoning: P-1 , Public Use District
8. Existing Zoning in the Area: P-1 , Public Use District
9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi-Public
10. Notification: The applicant was
notified in writing
of the hearing date. Notice
was properly published in
the Daily Record Chronicle
on September 11 ,
1981 and posted in
three places on or
near the site as
required by City
Ordinance on September
11 , 1981 .
C. ,mISTOR;/:ACKGROU D :
The subject site was part of the original plat of the
City of Renton. The present hangars appear to have
been originally constructed by the City and remodeled
by Renton Aviation in the early 1970 ' s . On May 15 ,
1980 the Hearing Examiner approved a 37 , 100 square foot
hangar expansion for the existing facility.
PRELIMINARY REPOR"' 70 THE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON AVIATION
OCTOBER 6, 1981
PAGE TWO
D. SICK C G O ] :
1 . Topography: The subject site is essentially level
east. of..:the-:airport perimeter road and rises approxi-
mately 10 feet .on the west side of the perimeter
road to Rainier Avenue North.
2. Soils : Urban Land (Ur) . This soil has been modified
by disturbing the natural layers with the addition
of fill to accommodate industry.
3. Vegetation: All native vegetation has been removed
from the site and replaced with asphalt east of
the perimeter road and trees and grass west of
the perimeter road.
4 . Wildlife: Very little of the subject site is suitable
for wildlife habitat.
5. Water : No water is present on the subject site.
6. Land Use: Renton Aviation presently occupies a
6,600 square foot building on the subject site.
E. isftIGMS` :,OOD CHARACTERISTICS:
Most of the surrounding properties are aviation oriented,
with most space utilized for hangars , taxiways, and
runways . To the north of the site is the Sunbird Restaurant.
F. LIC SERVICES:
1 . Water and Sewer: An 8" water line was extended
along the Perimeter Road to the Sunbird Restaurant
in 1977. Sanitary sewers have existed on the site
for years. The sewerage is pumped uphill to the
Bryn Mawr sewer interceptor.
2. Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Fire Dept.
per ordinance requirements.
3 . Transit: The site is serviced by METRO Transit
routes on Rainier Avenue North immediately adjacent '
to the site.
4 . Schools : Not applicable.
5. Recreation: Not applicable.
G. APPLIECILZ S1 CTI'"w S OF THE Z$" 'Th CODE:
1 . Section 4-710-4 , Review of Municipal Improvements.
2. Section 4-710, Public Use District.
H. ;\ 'PLIC ;:,L1E SECTIONS OF THE li p r:I ;ENSIVE PLAN 412. OT1 !'
mem CITY T:
1 . Policies Element, Comprehensive Plan (1980) , Air
Transportation Objective (7 .F) , p. 17.
2. Airport Comprehensive Plan, February, 1978.
I. FACT ON 11 11 N TURAL OR m ul I'/A f l ENVIRONMENT:
1 . Natural Systems : Minor.
PRELIMINARY ' REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER _
Y
RENTON AVIATIO1
OCTOBER 6, 1981
PAGE THREE
2. Population/Employment: Minor - Robertson Aircraft •
presently operates at the Municipal Airport. This
expanded facility only slightly increases employment
opportunities.
3 . Schools : Not applicable.
4 . Social: Not applicable
5. Traffic : Minor.
J. VI!'4'sir rI T L ASSES$`'l i' iT/ OLD DETERMINATION:I it i I ,w I' ,d
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance
and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended,
RCW 43-21C, the ERC issued a memorandum of concurrence
on September 2 , 1981 for the subject proposal that is
substantially within the scope of the declaration of
non-significance issued for the previous Site Approval
on April 10, 1980.
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1 . City of Renton Building Division.
2. City of Renton Engineering Division.
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division.
4 . City of Renton Utilities Division.
5. City of Renton Fire Department.
L. AIL DDP,.,,Ir: : roiNT ANALYSIS:
1 .. The subject proposal is consistent with the Public
Use designation of the land .use element of the
City 's Comprehensive Plan, the existing zoning,
and the Airport Master Plan.
2. As proposed, the applicant plans to construct in
phases four (4) light airplane hangars to house
private aircraft. Review of the site plan indicates
that basic code requirements for setbacks , parking,
and access have been complied with. However, the
Engineering Division of the Public Works Department
advises that a 25 ' structure setback from the center
line of the runway is required as per Federal Aviation
Administration standards. This requirement will
necessitate either a readjustment of the proposed
hangars or a Variance request from the FAA.
3. Conceptual landscaping is proposed for the parking'
and maneuvering areas. Detailed plans, however,
will have to be submitted to the Land Use Inspector
of the Building Department for approval.
4 . A concrete retaining wall in planned for the east
side of the W. Perimeter Road parking area. Details
regarding size and site distance factors must be
received and approved by the Traffic Engineering
Division and the Building Division.
M. DEPA' : H r''TAL I lriu:iNDA'7C'7IONS
Based upon the above analysis recommend approval of
the request subject to:
1' . Satisfaction of the FAA setback requirement of L-2 .
2 . Submittal and approval of detailed landscape plans and
retaining wall specifics as per L-3 and L-4 .
V7iiii11- -7 T i=Il ,
r'TT' 1T r r r
rl
j 1 1 :'iJ4 iIliiTI1rTT "L ti4 N'",- fir^ (
h7
I 'r r .T rir; iris I ,rT 71 ' Jr1 \ CI • f l
J r3 ";L_1 11 _ 11 a 1BOWLINGJT1'.
J.
71"611 Igo....
l r 4---
1
1 ,::''
7 .,
1.... ,I,'1 r 1 1 ,-r,•'B 01 — rT i' rrl. r rr .,
Sr
3i.•.1 r
SS 1:;:ek“t ripf,.-i T^"TT'^-r i? irr7'
S- - - -- rn r1,
Jiqyy_; it1.
u..' ltHi J
I
I' . II' ?1 lir,7'ke-,. ., ,
h ii . : io norcj—
r..,iT$r,P I T T
e j IZif1 'Ti moo/t A H
l ''"
rrrriif-' r"Tiifillii 111,1 T' , ri it - Id.' .iI ,,t_
l .
r i TTTfr Irn I,r, TT rffrlf. _
1, I f 11i1J 1,. .., L r
flit
l ':,'
e L +r
f
rT:r rr 1 E1 ,
g '
rc i
I!
4 .. w , 1TTUTITS33.
1iiil11 111`L..,..1 _.1 al-e/ 1 l..lt_. k
1'rr,
TTT i rr-T 1 • ITT r T o j -L
r
tt11itL1..1.:1..k1 , ,--, ' r °..{`-y-
T ,
On ` li
till rigleg
r T'rT T
2
t IQ z
r
R'' * •„ fix 1 t
rueinri Ts
we me 1I. ._ fie.711 ' 1
ti,4P •
a
RENTON AVIATION — SA-077-81
I APPLICANT RENTON AVIATION TOTAL AREA 6 . 03 acres
1 PRINCIPAL ACCESS Rainier Ave . North
EXISTING ZONING P-1 , Public Use District
l
EXISTING USE Single Hangar
PROPOSED USE Airp1ana Hangars fnr Priva1- Air-Trott
f
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Public/Quasi-public
COMMENTS
f
AVIATION COMMITTEE
MEETING
Thursday, September 10, 1981 Municipal Building
7:00 p.m. 4th Floor Conf. Rm.
Committee: Richard Stredicke, Chairman
Thomas Trimm, Vice-Chairman
Staff: Richard Houghton, Acting P/W Director
Louie Gebenini , Airport Director
Larry Warren, City Attorney
Jean Truman, Airport Secretary
Guests: Mr. &. Mrs. Jean Wirz, Fancher Flyways
Mr. Jack Volkel , Aero-Dyne Corp.
Mr. Al Blake, Aero-Dyne Corp.
Mr. John Melton, Aero-Dyne Corp.
Mr. Charles Roberts, Renton Aviation
MINUTES
1 . CALL TO ORDER - The meeting was called to order by Chairman Stredicke at
7:00 p.m.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - The minutes of August 13, 1981 were approved.
3. CORRESPONDENCE - None
4. NEW BUSINESS
a. Aero-Dyne Leases - Mr. Gebenini commented that the Administration was
still asking for $. 12 per sq. ft. for both leases, exclusive of the building, on
three-year leases. He noted receipt of letter from Robert Morgan, Boeing, agree-
ing to a three-year lease on a portion of Apron C, with a 90-day revocable clause,
instead of the 120-day revocable clause mentioned at the last meeting. Mr. Stredicke
noted that Boeing should lease the property to Aero-Dyne and not go through the City.
He noted also that the City was giving Boeing credit for $. 10 a square foot for
99,800 sq. ft. and was receiving less than that amount from Aero-Dyne on a month-to-
month lease. Mr. Warren concurred in this opinion, noting it put the City in the
position of a sub-lessor. Mr. Volkel explained why this sub-lease had happened,
noting the Board felt that it would lose control of the airport land. Mr. Blake
noted they would be agreeable to leasing directly from Boeing. Mr. Warren said the
City would have to approve any sub-lease to be sure the business was a proper one
for the Airport.
Mr. Stredicke noted the offer of $. 12 per sq. ft. for both land leases had been
offered to Aero-Dyne for acceptance within seven days and if it was not accepted
in that time, the offer was null and void. Aero-Dyne did not accept this offer,
but instead counter-offered at $. 11 per sq. ft. for five years on both land leases ,
LAG 1608-69 and LAG 1816-7.1 and $. 105 per sq. ft. for Apron C. Mr. Warren noted
that there had been long discussions about the old Vocational Bldg. and it had not
even been mentioned. Mr. Gebenini noted this would be settled later. Mr. Warren
suggested that the disputed building be included in the lease if Aero-Dyne would
accept the City's offer of $. 12 per sq. ft. for both leases- for three years. Mr.
Stredicke made a formal offer of the two leases for three years at $. 12 per square
foot and if it ,was accepted within fourteen days, the building would be included.
Aero-Dyne can deal with The Boeing Company on the Apron "C" lease. If not accepted,
the matter will go to arbitration. Mr. Warren said that if it went to arbitration,
it should be settled in from 45 to 60 days.
o
AVIATION COMMITTEE MEETING
September 10, 1981 - Page 2
b. Fancher Flyways Leases - Chairman Stredicke reported that any difficulty
with the Fancher Flyways leases had been cleared up and a report would go to
Council recommending the leases he executed.
c. Report on Fencing - Mr. Gebenini said he had obtained a number of esti-
mates on the fencing on the east side and they were all pretty high, $6,283.33,
6, 118.47 and Secoma bid $5, 199 but would not guarantee it. He noted the Air-
port did not have the money at this time to install the fence and proposed that
the fence be put between the roadway and the river and not next to the lease
lines. Chairman Stredicke noted the fence was to protect the leased properties.
Further discussion was held about ADAP funding, position of the gates and where
the fence lines should be.
d. Municipal Hangar Roof - Mr. Gebenini reported the roofing job was all
complete in one and one-half days.
e:" -Renton Aviation, Inc. -.. Mr. Roberts of Renton Aviation said that he was
interested-In-moving the -fence-on their west boundary, noting it goes up about12feettothePerimeterRoadanddropsoffonbothsides. The area would be
used for additional parking as in some places there is as much as 30 feet. The
plan is to build a rockery or wall at the road. The fence will not be needed and
Could possibly be used in some area on the Airport. He displayed a tentative planforthearea. The area between the wooden fence by the Sunbird Restaurant entranceandthemetalfence. It was noted if the fence was removed you could park cars in
there now without too much excavation. Mr. Houghton inquired if this rockery wouldhavetoholdtheroad. Mr. Trimm noted there was wiring in that area. The Committee
noted tentative approval of the plan until definite plans were submitted.
5. OLD BUSINESS
a. Fire Department Ruling on Sprinkler Systems - Mr. Gebenini noted answer
from Ass ' t. City Attorney re the Fire Department requirement for sprinkler systems
in airport tenants buildings. If the uses have commenced since the codification of
the Uniform Fire Code into our City Code, then these uses should not be "grandfathered".The Clerk' s Office will identifythe first enactment of the Uniform Fire Code into our
ordinance.
b. Seaplane Ramp Silt Problem - Mr. Gebenini noted that Vince Lee had been investi-
gating on this problem and the requirements that would be needed which include CorpofEngineers ' permit and reviews by Federal Dept. of Interior, NOAA, EPA, State Dept.
of Ecology, State Department of Fisheries and would also need a Shoreline Act Exemp-tion or Permit. Engineering has been asked to assist in obtaining estimates of amountofmaterialtobedredgedandcostestimatesforasummerof1982schedule. General
Construction Co. is working in the area and they have barges and other equipment and
we would like to get some kind of estimate as to how much it will cost the City.
6. ADJOURNMENT - The meeting adjourned at 8: 10 p.m.
mtv um Vd I
7.1z 3/9/
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application:
A` /se.
e ne .,(rplettt a, 4 .Jr?'e
Location: VB°et ty r. fiabea,c4
Applicant: ri n
TO :public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
Traf Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: / Ojti11t's Eng. Division
DrFl re Department
Darks Department
Building Department
I] Police Department
Others:_
COMMENTS O . SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRI`rING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON
Cr1361d
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:F
Approved '(pproved with Conditions El Not Approved
u.62 d,v Wiee/t e 'S7epy`" Lq v syeer
DATE: ?///_;5"//e55 /7
Diignatureof rector or Aut rite Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved ['Approved with Conditions Not Approved
5146S Tv AP"(U)J 1,h3rcn. (°cam Sa mitCP LcX.oroars or= (?. q ir•ar
45 ii)&' i Wurlihvzs
DATE:_ /
Signature of ri rector or Authorized Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: GM/EE ://1/6r-
Approved [ .)proved with Conditions 0 Approved
1'lP se ,-le is ' g6//`0 . Pes,v ,4,
7 7/1,9 r'S 74D 71h_, i7 e r
DATE: 3 e9/
Signature of Di r for or AuLhor;i zed Rep entati ve
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 7 /f/;' /-/C E 7I/G'//v4-L, =7/vc,
B Approved ® Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved
1(0,71/'''
DATE:._
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved ® Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved
C7__1 t DATE:q)--7- I/
Signatu e of Director or Au hori zed Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved []Approved with Conditions ®Not Approved
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
ri Approved ® Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved
2),DATE: 5-8/
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
El Approved [Approved with Conditions Not Approved
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No (s ) . : SA-038-80
Environmental Checklist No . : ECF-557-80
Description of proposal : Application for site
approval to expand
existing facility
for service and maintenance
of aircraft
Proponent : RENTON AVIATION
Location of proposal :840 W. Perimeter
Road , northwest corner
of Renton Municipal -
Airport
Lead Agency : - City of Renton
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on April 10 , 1980 following
a presentation by Steve Munson and Dave Clemens of the Planning
Department . Oral comments were accepted from :
Warren Gonnason , expressed need for adequate space tobe leased
for parking . Gordon Y . Ericksen questioned use of parkway .
Gordon Y . Ericksen expressed need to address future parking
requirements . All expressed likely requirements for additional
traffic control devices . ECRF ' s were ,received from the Building
Division , Fire Department , and the April 8 , 1980 memorandum
from the Fire Department .
Incorporated by reference in the record of the procedings
of the ERC on application ECF-557-80 are the following :
1 ) ,; Environmental Checklist Review Sheet , prepared by :
1 Steve Munson , Assistant Planner , April 8 , 1980
2 ) Applications : RENTON AVIATION SITE APPROVAL , SA-038-80
3 ) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance :
Gordon Y . Ericksen proposed , all concurred.
Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined
this development does not have significant adverse impact
on ;the environment . An EIS is not required under RCW
43 .21C .030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by
the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and
other information on file 'with the lead agency .
R
ignatures :
ohn E . Webl 9 , ' . rks Directo , " • on V. ! (. k 'en, Planning
1---'" arect.
WJr'ren C . Gonnason , Public ' rks Director
y:
MEMORANDUM OF CONCURRENCE
APPLICATION NO (s) : ECF-083-81 (B-259)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to construct new airplane
hangar.
PROPONENT: Renton Aviation
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Vicinity of 840 W. Perimeter Road.
LEAD AGENCY: Building Department
DATE OF ERC REVIEW: September 2 , 1981
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined
that the requested modifications to the initial proposal
reviewed under SA-038-80 on April 10, 1980 are within the
scope of that original proposal and the environmental deter-
mination of non-significance is still valid.
This decision was reached following a presentation by Ronald
Nelson of the Building Department. Oral comments wore accepted
from:
Ronald Nelson David Clemens
Richard Houghton Roger Blaylock.
Steve Munson Ken Walls
Michael Parness Jeanette Samek
Gary Norris Don Persson
Incorporated by reference' in the record of proceedings of
the ERC on application B-259 are the following:
1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheets, prepared by:
Steve Munson Dated April 8, 1980
2) Application (s) : SA-038-80 (ECF-557-80)
B-259 (ECF-083-81 )
SIGNATURES:
tea. - k
onald G. Nelson id R. C emens, Acting
Building Director Planning Director
chard C. Houghton, c ing
Public Works Director
l Vll J/ 17O I
Y/z I9/
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: w.
e
neila eurpiatte A a Dcla r4,
Location: • lG! @! e V Wad
Applicant: PeA4016 , A 4•-8®
L; Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 494;6.
Utilities Eng. Division
Fire Department .
Parks Department
Build'ng Department
olice Department
f Others:
COMMENTS OR' SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THEPLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON
CU36/0
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: pc„,e,_<_.,z.
Approved ® Approved with Conditions Not Approved
DATE: / --- p'25,_8
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved 0 Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved
DATE:
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
Revision 3/1981
2. 3 9/
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: gft—O77-8f (Sisk Aper0ip,a/id;ôn +0
Con Sir vet new curpIaa. Atyo. ra
Location: We IA HIy QC eel?) W. tr t . l4r A..LJ .
Applicant: peA•48/1 A-ui0.,4to?
la:Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: ig*8/
Utilities Eng. Division
Fire Department
Darks Department
uilding Department
Police Department
Others:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON
C713ot9i
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: C`J L
c Approved ® Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved
OF 1./
i,,/.4-e.,-- DATE:
Signatu,-f Director or A horized Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved ®Approved with Conditions ®Not Approved
DATE:
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
rcev l s l On 3/ I yZ5 1 Cild07. 3 p9/
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Applications:4 O77" 9V Ile AppreiVal) Applieesicidet
s
rplazkoAn.Kjetr.
Location: a ® n Q' goter, oa
Applicant: U & `'®I:
TO:O Pub1 i c Works Department
E®Engi ering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
raffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: liOPYUtilitiesEng. Division
l Fire Department
Darks Department
l Building Department
Q Police Department
0 Others:
COMMENTS ORISUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON
i ®/ i
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: j 1/C 6 4-7 epty
QApproved ® Approved with Conditions [' Not Approved
vV
DATE:, 0
Signature of Director or Authorized Aeesentativep
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved DApproved with Conditions ®Not Approved
DATE:
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
Kevision i/ I93I
7/2.319/
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: iSD Im® ® r leek!)et 1-e,
pro
Location: Wart ill d et?, IAA API,ear', ra geid2601
Applicant: ! Peierteii486°C4-44®11
ID : •Public Department
ngineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
Traffic Eng. Division .
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 40/Utilities Eng. Division
ri Fire Department _
Parks Department _
ri Building Department
L:_! Police Department
Others
COMMENTS OR' SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE _ PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON
er13610
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:416,# Eeci/jam
ppr'oved Q Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved
2ltw.se /ld'/e 2S ' £ai`o/i- res ric a4r ri--2
47n9 s y 7 o
DATE: -2.3 c9/
Signature of Dir for or Au horized Repeentative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved DApproved with Conditions (] Not Approved
DATE:
Signature of Director or Authorized Re_presentative
INC V J/ I V°I
caz 319/
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: O779 f ( ®1e Arpp o 4.
eve?' new eterpiatto duar r.
Location: WN4lailer dAprew, 040,. Raz6021
Applicant: , A 68440 ®P
TO:public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:
8Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: lO®Eng. Division
re Department
Parks Department
Bui 1 di ng Department
Police Department
U Others:
COMMENTS OR, SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON
f 3610
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: } i c.
Approved ErApproved with Conditions Not Approved
VC7% d S/ 2
4/ . S7410 y /L sf, r
DATE: ?ASte/
Signature of Director or Aut rize Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Lt'Tlory
fl Approved R4proved with Conditions :pot Approved
5a&s c,c -ID qPP r.443764. (i.5440LJhNo6, LOC..Taws or- 0.0 Lolei9
Pir1 7 I4(0ai es
DATE: f/ /
Signature of erector or Authorized Representative
OF 1k4,.
VI THE CITY OF RENTON
w,.w,9
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055
BARBARA. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 0 LAND USE HEARING EXAMINERo •
9'
O co.
FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-25930
T6.0 SEP1 VP
September 18, 1981
TO: Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner
FROM:Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner
RE: File No. SA-077-81 ; Renton Aviation
This letter is in response to your memorandum, dated September 18, 1981 .
Section 4-3012 requires a written report and recommendation by the
Planning Department prior to the public hearing. The report permits
all parties, including members of the public and the applicant, an
opportunity to 'review the proposal . The report also informs the
Examiner of the request and permits the formulation of questions.
pertaining to the request.
This office has maintained the continued policy of holding a public
hearing only after receiving the required report per ordinance
standards and this policy will be maintained in this case. The item
may be continued to the next available hearing dale without further
public notice.
If this office can be of further assistance, please to not hesitate to
call .
La V43:446"fx,""'"'
cc: Mayor
City Attorney
Members, E.R.C.
Renton Aviation, Inc.
OF RA,
o THE CITY OF RENTON
U t$ ® I Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
NelL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
9,0
235- 2550
0grkD SEP-Cke
MEMORANDUM
DATE:j SEPTEMBER 18 , 1981
TO: FRED J. KAUFMAN
LAND USE 'HEARING EXAMINER
FROM ROGER J. BLAYLOCK
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SUBJCT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR RENTON AVIATION
I recently requested thhat the public hearing scheduled for
Renton Aviation, SA-077-81, on September 22, 1981 be :continued
until October 13, 1981 to allow- the City of Renton Aviation
Committee the opportunity to grant final approval to _the -
proposal. After consulting with the applicant, Mr. Charles
Roberts, and Mr. Louis Gebinini, Manager of the Renton Municipal
Airport, I., would request that the public hearing be opened on
Tuesday, September 22nd, and that the Planning Department
submit a verbal report during the public hearing. This is
in direct. opposition to Section 4-3012; .however, the applicant
has informed me that he will request in writing that the public
hearing be opened and he waves his rights, under Section 4-3012.
The Plannning Department can provide you with all the back-
ground information in writing prior to the public hearing.
The analysis can be presented verbally. In a normal situation,
thisdepartment would not suggest opening the hearing;however,
the original review conduct.bd, last year actually anticipated
the present proposal and the Environmental Review Committee
included the 4 hangers in their original Declaration of Non-
Significance. In addition, to assure that the Aviation.:Committee •
Chairman, Mr. Richard Stredicke, concur:sn that the Committee
has address the review of the proposal, I have requested that
the applicant provide in writing a statement from Mr. Stredicke
at the public hearing on September 22nd.
En URI) M
VI Nil NH INC.
AIRCRAFT LAND AND SEA BASE
840 W. PERIMETER RD. • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • PHONE(206)255-1422
September 18, 1981
Mr. Fred Kaufman
Land Use Hearing Examiner
City of Renton
200 Mill Ave.
Renton, Wash. 98055
Re: Renton Aviation Site Plan
Dear Mr. Kaufman,
Renton Aviation requests the hearing scheduled 'for
September 22, 1981 be held as planned. We waive our right
to .seven days advance notice, in writing, of the staff
report. The staff report can be verbal in reply to presenta-
tions by Charles L. Roberts of Renton Aviation and Louis Gebinini,
Airport Director.
The record can be left for seven (7) working days for staff
comments and comments from any other interested individuals.
Sincer ,
4.1Z4'
2
Charles L. Roberts, President
Renton Aviation, Inc.
CR/db
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
SEP1 31981 .
OMAMP
7,819110111,12111213,4i5,6
N
AUTHORIZED Cessna. DEALER
SALES / SERVICE / PARTS / CHARTER / FLIGHT TRAINING
OF I
A.
z THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
ma 0) BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
0
9, 235- 2550
0,
9gT6'D SEP.1
2)4
MEMORANDUM
DATE:i SEPTEMBER 16, 1981
TO: i FRED J. KAUFMAN, HEARING EXAMINER
FROM: GER J. BLAYLOCK,. ASSOCIATE PLANNER
TSUBJECT: RELATION AVIATION/SITT E APPROVAL
SA-077-81
It has come to our attention .that .the Aviation Committee
of the Renton City' Council has only tentatively approved
the conceptual plans for expansion of Renton Aviation.
The Committee' s regular meeting day is first Mo.nday. .of
the month; therefore, their next meeting will not be
until October. In .addition, the applicant has made
somelrevision to his plans beyond the location of the
hanger, .which have not been throughly reviewed by all
City departments. Therefore, we request that the item
be continued to Tuesday, October 13, 1981 with new notices
of the public hearing posted on the property and published
in the Renton Record Chronicle.
I/
r
1
Receipt # ,,
t
t,
CITY OF RENTON.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
11 I? 1
NAME /I l --:-.Yi--,W) ,' 1 , ; ,.1 e; i i e-,,1 DATE i ,, ,
4' •
i
4, 4
PROJECT 4, LOCATION ;) '‘'‘' •
1:',),, • .,-- ,
i:,' ,'/, '-'..,,-,',, ,''' e'-)---, .7,-,-,:-..14, '-
i ; ,, 7;
1, `
y''
1 c' ) ''
t ' / ( . , ' ""'' '1 `i ,..,
Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total
9 r ii ,
1,
Environmental Checklist c.„,
Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee
TOTAL FEES 4 /76
Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor.
Thank vnil
6 4 1 ' 1 ' . I .
GENRAL: LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS:
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF 840 W. PERIMETER ROAD
LtZGAL DESCRIPTION;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE I THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
S P r3 TEC TO NOTIFY P0PERTI OtgINEiti 0',-':
t
i 4
1'
4
4•
TO BE HELD
IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING
ON SEPTEMBER 22) 1981 BEGINNING AT 9: 00 AM.
P.M.
CONCERNING ITEM WI
r-Li REZONE I.
eft pry fil i 1ml
A i,10, - in, 1r p ru,R„IT 4
0.", ,IF
El LITE At-IP0V Ai. 56A
ri WAWER
tz 2 ti i a:
4-
us,-
A -
CI 1 wo , -,,,,1 11Ci10"1"" 04. im MANAG t E. K P , Fi 1 ,
NI! MEMORANDUM OF CONCURRENCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION
OF NON—SICNIFICANCF, DATED APRIL 10, 1930
FOR FUATHER iNFOIIMATiON CALL 233 2550
i''',-X,IiT TO BE RE tro'Vrif) ','VTIA,,CLA PC/41k AUTHORIZATIO4
CITY OF RENTON
LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
September 22, 1981
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 9 :00 a.m. :
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING
The applications listed are in order of application number
only and not necessarily the order in which they will be
heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion
of the Hearing Examiner.
R-001-81 BLOOD, DURWOOD E.
Application for rezone from R-1 to R-2
to permit future construction of ten
townhouse condominium units; property
located on the south side of N.E. 14th
Street approximately 130 feet west of
Edmonds Avenue N. E.
R-069-81 CARACCIOLI , JULIUS AND STELLA
Application for rezone from G to L-1
for future office, warehouse, and material
storage uses; property located on the
west side of East Valley Road approximately
320 feet south of S.W. 16th Street.
SP-071-81 CHURCH OF CHRIST
Application for special permit to allow
a 1200 square foot addition to existing
church and landscaping, paving and parking
improvements in an R-3 zone; property
located in the vicinity of 2527 N.E.
12th Street between Edmonds Avenue N.E.
and Harrington Avenue N.E.
Short Plat 074-81 BITNEY, DEAN W.
W-075-81 Applications for 4-lot single family
residential short plat in G zone and
waiver of off-site improvements ; property
located west side of Union Avenue S. E.
adjacent to south annex of Leisure Estates
Mobile Home Park.
SA-077-81 RENTON AVIATION
Application for site approval in P-1
zone to construct 4 airplane hangers
for storage of private aircraft ; property
located at 840 West Perimeter Road, northwest
corner of the Renton Municipal Airport.
b
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING
EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 22, 1981 , AT
9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION:
1 . RENTON AVIATION
Application for site approval in P-1 zone to construct
4 airplane hangers for storage of private aircraft,
File SA-077-81 ; property located at 840 West Perimeter
Road, northwest corner of the Renton Municipal Airport.
Legal description of the file noted above is on file in the
Renton Planning Department.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE
PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 22, 1981 , AT 9 :00
A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
PUBLISHED: SEPTEMBER 11 , 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS
ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE
ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to
before me, a Notary Public, in
and for the State of Washington
residing in King County, on the
9th day of September, 1981 .
SIGNED: .X2&•e77/(es-ot,c7e1-‘.,
Alom*RANDUM OF CONCURRENCE
APPLICATION NO (s) : ,ECF-083-81 (B-259)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to construct new airplane
hangar.
PROPONENT: Renton Aviation
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Vicinity of 840 W. Perimeter Road.
LEAD AGENCY: Building Department
DATE OF ERC REVIEW: September 2 , .1981
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined
that the requested modifications to the initial proposal
reviewed under SA-038-80 on April 10, 1980 are within the
scope of that original proposal and the environmental deter-
mination of non-significance is still valid.
This decision was reached following a presentation by Ronald
Nelson of the Building Department. Oral comments were accepted
from:
Ronald Nelson David Clemens
Richard Houghton Roger Blaylock.
Steve Munson Ken Walls
Michael Parness Jeanette Samek
Gary Norris Don Persson
Incorporated by reference in the record of proceedings of
the ERC on application B-259 are the following:
1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheets, prepared by:
Steve Munson Dated April 8 , 1980
2) Application (s) : SA-038-80 (ECF-557-80)
B-259 (ECF-083-81 )
SIGNATURES:
onald G. Nelson id R. C emens, Acting
Building Director Planning_ Director
chard C. Houghton, ding
Public Works Director
r///
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No (s ) . : SA-038-80
Environmental Checklist No . : ECF-557-80
Description of proposal : Application for site
approval to expand
existing facility
for service and maintenance
of aircraft
Proponent : RENTON AVIATION
Location of proposal :840 W. Perimeter
Road , northwest corner
of Renton Municipal
Airport
Lead Agency : City of Renton
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on April 10 , 1980 following
a presentation by Steve Munson and Dave Clemens of the Planning
Department . Oral comments were accepted from :
Warren Gonnason , expressed need for adequate space tobe leased
for parking . Gordon Y . Ericksen questioned use of parkway .
Gordon Y . Ericksen expressed need to address future parking
requirements . All expressed likely requirements for additional
traffic control devices . ECRF ' s were received from the Building
Division , Fire Department , and the April 8, 1980 memorandum
from the Fire Department .
Incorporated by reference in the record of the procedings
of the ERC on application ECF-557-80 are the following :
1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet , prepared by:
Steve Munson, Assistant Planner, April 8, 1980
2) Applications : RENTON AVIATION SITE APPROVAL , SA=038-80
3 ) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance :
Gordon Y. Ericksen proposed , all concurred.
Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined
this development does not have significant adverse impact
on th'e environment . An EIS is not required under RCW
43 .21'C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by
the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and •
other information on file with the lead agency .
ignatures :
hn E . Webl e rks Director .( don Y T. k -en,+ Planning
irect.°'
I
Warren C . Gonnason , Public `irks Director
I ter
1
Date circulated : - i o Comment Niue : ritifeei
E\IVIRO HE\TAL CHECKLIST REVIE,r SHEET
E C F - 6:V- go
APPLICATION No (s ) . ..5-4-O3ca-60
PROPONENT : Re,,A40n 4Vi's-4"fi1
PROJECT TITLE : Ha. - Sl.excezie
4 Servr'c4e 601.4?roc7,'oJ
Brief Description Ufa Pi oodct : to °SA- 140 4Vdevc sli'l
x r 9 i' a.w(Jj*rLJ4ly,,J;// tJ .rwYcam.
LOCATION : g4/O W der eK e v C.,' et A-
SITE AREA : Z C.O36tetes BUILDING AREA (gross) 'p- (131?0043V;'
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
1 INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : X
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X
3) Water & water courses : X
4) Plant life : X
5 )) Animal life : X
6) Noise : X
7) Light & glare :
8) (and Use ; north: /_ a5 4 Tit• at
141164,47 44,4.
e a s t : Al-p ri4 A I. tow(k''
south : E1a4,„-...1 &rec fiftmes s 8Gil •
w e s t : A eotf`er' A e
Land use conflicts : A61,m2 r"r,Q.•.i'f
View obstruction : //ovo
9) Natural resources : A
10) Risk of upset :
11) Piopulation/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :y 6Pr,
13) Trip ends (ITE) : A 1251 robtreeile, 'te uk 9•o'"K44.•
traffic impacts : Ant- Si9 st,r7`iel
14) Public services :
15 ) Energy :X
16) Utilities : A
17 ) Human health: X
18) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history:: _
COMMENTS : Oticint7erile44stieems. Guth( /-erdir J.
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information
j- J-111-:4-0j P,14,-,4_,Reviewed by : Via% Title :
Date : ; v.,,,,°eo
j
r/ .. ,
Date circulated _ W.Vd. A.
oComme .5 due :iVilig2.___
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIE`5_ SHEET
ECF -7_ ® •
APPLICATION o(s) . , ' a ® ,z04..h•',« "''•
PROPONENT : &dew "!goterthjola
PROJECT T I TLE:Alla, 6141faalePA 1,16i0Cre egni?St,
Brief 'Description of Pro 'ect= ayis ' :.r ,e r ` 1. p ,; :Lowe . ., eit; relit A•
LOCATION: hG ;mi1erQe. horqrniitr. ! Ivey jiw j
T Al:::_2,4" 1
SI TEE A'REAs BUILDING AREA (gross) 942.0
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (S) :
1
IMPACT REVIEW NONE . MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1) Topographic changes: c-
p
2) Direct/Indirect air quality:r./
3) Water & water courses: v
4) Plant life: y
5)' Animal life:
a
V
6) Noise :
7) Light & glare : v-
9) Land Use; north:
east :
south:
west :
Land use conflicts:0///
View obstruction: y-)
9) Natural resources : J
10) Risk of upset:,
11 ) Population/Employment :.
12 ) Number of Dwellings:
13) Trip ends (ITE) :
traffic impacts:
14) Public services: 1
e
15) Energy:
T
v
16) Utilities: V
17) Human health: v
18) Aesthetics:
L,: i
19) Recreation:
20) Archeology/ history I 1/ K 0 cif ;/l
COMMENTS:
17:-
5
i---.
Recommendation: DNSI More Information___ - /DOS
Reviewed by: // G Title •46,47),24/ 0-u-
Date : G---- 0
Date circulated Waite) Comme.,L0 due: `/tt --I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET %(P 4
APPLICATION o(s) . S. e. 63 = • e 0; e3CA 11 )
t t_
p i' 0 # ` LPROPONENT: I!i. b ,tryz
PROJECT TITLE:. 4P S ,m a 144410. ( s10
Description of Project : t•Brief
1.:
1.
4.h,, ,„ p,. „le , „.„, , 0 ,,,s.6.ip IC ;4 i .
LOCATION:
0 4.1,,,,,r4,p ®® R 0ew r`$ , ,.
0 • ®
SITE AREA:Ca. grstre.g BUILDING AREA (gross) 9476041
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
I
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO1) Tipographic changes:
2) Direct/Indirect air_ quality:
3) water & water courses:1
4) Plant life:
5)' Animal life:,
6) . Noise :
7) Light & glare
n
8) Land Use; north:
east:
south:
west :
Land use conflicts:
View obstruction:
9) Natural resources:1
10) Risk of upset:
11 ) Population/Employment: y1
12) Number of Dwellings: I
13) Trip ends (ITE) :
traffic impacts:
14) Public services: I
15) Energy:
16) Utilities:
k 1 k
17) Human health:
1
10) AesIthetics: 119) Recreation: k
20) Archeology/history: I N,, iCOMMENTS:
dze
1
Recommendation: SI_ DOS More Information
Reviewed by: 7/1c Title i,?' ; ,. ,
Date : , 1
l_
MEMORANDUM
FROM THE DESK OF . . . Apri1 . 8 , 1980
JIM MATTHEW
FIRE MARSHAL
TO: Enviornmental Review Committee
SUBJECT: Renton Aviation,
Construction of a 43,700 Sq. ft. service & maintenance hanger.
Information submitted on site drawing is insufficient to provide specific
requirements as to required fire flow and fire hydrants . Primary respon-
sibility for fire protection of field area at the airport is that of the
City of Renton Fire Department.
The impact of this developement on the field area is substantial when`
it is considered that the primary source of fire protection water supply
is from high pressure water mains owned by the Boeing Aircraft Company.
This water is supplied and metered from the Seattle pipeline. It may not be
located properly to be considered for protection purposes .
In order to provide sufficient water for fire protection, it may be
necessary to install additional main capacity -from existing city supplies .
In the future it may be necessary for the city to consider acquiring the
existing high pressure mains from Boeing, thus servicing its ' responsibil-
ities from its' own sources .
This proposed building is intended for the service and maintenance of air-
craft and should meet the requirement of the Uniform Building Code for an
H-5 building occupancy and those provisions of the Uniform Fire Code. per-
taining to Special Occupancy Uses .
T„
r
r 1
L;Co is l
r
pi,)f,
AFFIDAVIT
i 1pt i Pf9 as ' fi zs-iGVE'u -E 2 J, , being duly sworn, declare that
Lgge sexrsf to property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all .respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me
this 7,day ofj t17,,,, „ , 19 ,V/ ,
Notary Public in and for the State' of
Washington, residing at A/,/ (22 .
Name of otary Public) Signature of wner
2 3 g.z. Je, 27,74,J.-7,2_3 / /i Lda .g:110 (10 a-OM/MU (1
AdAddress) Address)
Ana 01)05 -
City) State)
06 is - - iit2Z-
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that __the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of such application .
Date Received 19 By:
Renton Planning Dept .
2-73
CITY OF RENTON
APPLICATION
SITE APPROVAL
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
File No . SA- 077 .' / Filing Date
Application Fee $ Receipt No.a7
Environmental Review Fee $
APPLICANT iT COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :
1. - Name 1 70 ./401A-11c' /cu'a) Phone 2'2—
Address 0 GO -1/Vt2TE.t- tEPTO GU AJ /O
2 . Property 'location C ! CIILiiC,P/t, le --70 r—
3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary)
J1j)
l
4. Number of acres or square feet 6 Ar 0E-- Present zoning
5 . Wha do, you propose to develop on this property? itcop,-F_I- ,sibei&E
6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application :
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks ,
Scale
existing structures , easements , and other
factors limiting development) . . . . . . . . . . 1" = 10 ' or 20 '
B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan . . . . . 1" = 10 '
C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning
on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ° to 800 '
D. Building height and area (existing and proposed)
7 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION :
Date Approved
Date Denied
Date Appealed
Appeal Action
Remarks
i'
1
f
Planning DP;ISt .
Rev, 1-7,Z/
LEASE AGREEMENT
City of Renton to Renton Aviation, Jac . )
THIS IND1;NTiJRE OF LEASF. executed in triplicate, effective as
of June 1 , 1979,, by and between the CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corpora-
1j ;••
tion, hereinafter referred to as Lessor; and Renton Aviation, Inc . , a
Washington Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Lessee:
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS the above parties have heretofore entered into and
executed certain lease agreements effective as of August 1, 1975 and
January 1, 1974 , further, identified as LAG 10-75 and Supplement #1-74
to LAG 1091-67 (Northwest Avionics) respectively, further reference
being had thereto, and
WHEREAS Lessee, by letter dated March 16 , 1979, has requested
consolidation of the aforespecified leases and the addition of certain
property as set forth in the legal descriptions below, and extension
of their leases out to forty (40) years, and
WHEREAS it is necessary and advisable to cancel and supersede
the aforesaid lease agreements and combine into one lease and provide
for such addition and an adjustment in the monthly rental necessitated
thereby,
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed and covenanted by and
between the parties as follows :
1 . It is hereby agreed Lessor does hereby lease and demise
unto Lessee the following described unimproved parcels of real estate
accepted by the Lessee in their "as- is" condition, being located within
the confines of the Renton Municipal Airport ; Renton, King County,
Washington, to wit:
Beginning at a point located on the Renton Airfield Runway Centerline
referred to as Station 0+00; thence N. 4° 49' 43" W. along the Runway
Centerline a distance of 4,272.63 Feet; Thence S. 85° 10' 17"W. a
Distance of 375 Feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence continuing
S. 84° 50' 50" W. a distance of 373.05 Feet; thence N. 2° 05' 50"
distance of 109.27 Feet; thence N. 00° 10' 25" E. a distance of 90.06
Feet; thence N. 1° 31 ' 17" W. a distance of 159.48 Feet; thence N. 4°
53' 45" E. a distance of 149.26 Feet; thence N. 12° 12' 51" E. a distance
of 198.78 Feet; thence N. 46° 34' 19" E. a distance of 83.63 Feet; thence
N. 85° 20' 29" E. a distance of 171 .61 Feet; thence S. 4° 49' 43" E. a
distance of 830.54 Feet to the True .Point of Beginning.
Area = A"%;- 262,850.21 square feet. See Exhibitfor Map Plan of Area.
SUBJECT to restrictions and reservations of record and as
further set forth herein;,
Together with the privilege of Lessee to use the public por-
tion of the airport, including runway and other public facilities pro-
vided thereon, on a non-exclusive basis, and subject to such rules '
and regulations as now exist or may hereafter be promulgated by the
Lessor from time to time, and further subject to all such non-discrimi-
natory charges and fees for such use as may be established from time
to time by Lessor; on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth
for a period of forty years commencing on the 1st day of June, 1979
and terminating on the 31st day of May, 2019, subject to the condi-
tions, however, specified in paragraphs 17 and 18 hereinbelow.
2 . As rental for the above-described premises during said
initial lease term, Lessee shall and will pay unto Lessor a monthly
rental of One Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty-Two Dollars and Thirty-
Three Cents ($1 , 752 . 33) computed at the annual rate of $ . 08 per square
foot, payable promptly in advance on the first day of each and every
month, and as further set forth in paragraph 17 hereinbelow. All
such payments shall be made to the Director of Finance, Municipal
Building, Renton, Washington.
3 . Above-described 'premises and the structures located
thereon are leased to the 'Lessee for the purpose of construction and
operation of aircraft storage facilities . Lessee covenants that the
premises shall be continuously used for thosepurposes during the term
of the lease, shall not be allowed to stand vacant or idle, and shall
PARKING LOT A .
BEGINNING at a point located on the Renton Airfield ,Runway Centerline
REFERRED TO AS STA. 0+00;
Thence North 4°49'43" West along the runway centerline a distance of
4,443.19 ft. ; thence South 85°10'17" Westerly a distance of •770.72 to
a point intersecting the centerline of Perimeter Road; thence continu ng
along the centerline of Perimeter Road South 1°34'02" Easterly a dis-
tance of 220.00 ft. ; thence South 88°25'58" westerly a distance of
14.00 ft. to the true point of beginning;
Thence S 88°25'58" westerly a distance of 45.00 ft. ; thence North
1°34'02" westerly a distance of 160.00 ft. ; thence North 88°25'38" ea -
terly a distance of 45.00 ft. ; thence South 1°34'02" easterly a dicta ce
of 160.00 ft. to the true point of beginning.
Area = 7200 sq. ft.
PARKING LOT B.
BEGINNING at a point located on the RENTON AIRFIELD RUNWAY CENTERLINE
REFERRED TO AS STA. 0+00;
Thence N 4°49'43" westerly along the, runway centerline a distance of
4,443.19 ft. ; thence S 85°10117" westerly a distance of 770.72 feet to
a point intersecting the'ceuter. line of Perimeter Road; thence continuing
along ' the centerline of Perimeter Road N 1°34102" westerly a distance of
86.69 ft. ; thence S 88°25'58" westerly a distance of 14.00 feet to the
tru, point of beginning; thence S 88°25'58" westerly a distance of 60.00
ft. to a point on a non tangent curve concave easterly, said curve has a
radius of 874.00 ft. and the center which bares N 88°25'58" easterly;
Thence along the arc of said curve a distance of 116.06 ft. to a point
of a non tangent curve; thence S 83°.57 '31" easterly a distance of 60.!' ft.
to a point on a non tangent curve concave westerly, said curve has a
radius of 814.00 feet and the center which bares S 88°57 ' 31" easterly;;
Thence along the arc of said curve a dist .wce of 108. 10 feet to a poi:
of a non tangent curve, which is the LflIC point of beginning.
Area = 6,724.76 sq. ft.
TY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
LHVIROMMEHTAL CHECKLIST FORM
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Application No. Q 77-- '/
Environmental Checklist No.aI o/ (,i /i
PROPOSED, date:FINAL , date:
ElDeclaration of Significance Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS :
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent A)J44) 1A-iis hive's
2. Address and phone number of Proponen
LI-0 liV ute) Fb
ceA ) 3 kU) 9
f t/22-
3. Date Checklist submitted dl
4. Agency requiring Checklist
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope
AcSzi -
nd nature) :
D)77 h' 5-
s
2-
y.
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental ttiinng of /t/he prtopo/s a/ll) : Pte (`e-KA i tit
y
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local --including rezones) :
TaA 1 1.-- lik-v)
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain:
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your propos 1? If yes, explain:
0
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, descri a the nature of such application form:
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- V
covering of the soil?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
40/
features?
ES MAYBE NO
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any d/
unique geologic or physical features?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , d/
either on or off the site?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
3-
2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or deterioration of° ambient air
quality?
YES MAYBE NO
b) The creation of objectionable odors?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate , either locally or
regionally?
YES MAYBE' NO
Explanation:
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements , in either marine or fresh waters?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?c1
YES MAYBE NO
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved .oxygen or turbidity?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
YES MAYBE NO
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through '
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates,, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria,
or other substances into the ground waters?
YES MAYBE NO
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies?YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers' of any
species of flora (including trees , shrubs, grass , crops,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
YES M YBE , NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or qJ
endangered species of flora?YET— MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing es
species?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
0
4-
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna?
YES MAYBE N4(,y
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare? YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area?YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) 19/
in the event of an accident or upset conditions?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area?YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
5-
12) Housing. Will th,. rroposal affect existing housing , or
create a demand for additional housing?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand
for new parking?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , e/
bicyclists or pedestrians?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
a) Fire protection?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Police protection?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Schools?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services?
L/
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities :
i
a) Power or natural gas?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Communications systems?
YES MAYBE 10/
c) Water?
YES MAYBE NO
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Storm water drainage?
P7
YES MAYBE NO
f) Solid waste and disposal?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
17) Human' Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
V
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building?
YES MAYBE- NO
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above • formation
is true and complete. It is understood that-the lead age c may withdr an decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in re i-an upon th' eckl ' should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful 1 c fu di • -r my part.
Proponent:
sjgnd
name printed
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
LEG
OF . FILE
FILE TITLE
p
y{ I
1 A i'
s^r,K
i
Ft
II
I
III
I