HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA82-013BEiith*1I1 &
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
MICROFILM
I
QI32
I
10111AailMA$ 311f003AO11ddlfAlMOI31A30t
NG); f =h,
2/ 31VVS
s_.., .- .-\:,'...-'''''' ' 1' • . I : * -
7...
4.
Q
0
4`,
t
NT1 fd
1 '
O'l \ t11VH$Sb1Siu,3 •y
CA401.
wy
sp
3S •3N3. 1S 'I1c( i.,
d3lh) ).. CI1IN14412,T40.,
Nt3: ,, ',2 * ,8j4 'd'.4CIN --- " t
I1" J
yL'e lter, • si'. t }
is4 p
4' " Ay
si
Z8616183.1
i ILIA11MEr"
11401N31110A.:13
i/
illl.
3iIli.
1,
1
I
1
I
i') {
1
1•
11tt
3ii1iS
1
1.
1. ,
1
t.
1
t
1 /
l
1/
jj
lit::i ..
1llrj!!:
11
1.:
illtt!!`
1!
1ijt
lji..'
l: }
I
ll
j
I'.
1
1l.
ti '
iii
1
1
1.'
i!
1 :
I ,...
111.
lii
1,;
1.
111,.
111
1 .:
1.
1'
1'
11'
t
1
1.
11 .
t,
t .
t.
111,
1.
1.
1..
t
1
1. .
iS
1t,
1
11 .
I.
I..
t
i
1
1.
1t...
li.,..
11, •
1111
II.
I
t.
J1.
1
1•..
t11",. ::
1 ,.
iil.
i;
i4. ..,.
li•
1t .
111,
ji.
1„
1
Ii'
I
IiS
i' '
li
ili14 ' '
lIll
1i1,
1_1:
1
l:
1.
1.
4M.;
1 .
41i
Iii
is '
kti
t
ii
it1ii
III!
111,
I:
iili
il'
4
HT.:.
4.
ii
II
y
1,
Ilil}
Iit
r
i : .;
iri
ton,-• -
1,
11
1 •
1 • !
11
11.
1 ;
iIi ':
t -
i
i. ;
I1
i ,
111 : , • , •
I
1
11
it1
1I
Ji
ill
n
1
J •
1 .
i
r
i
l : :
1: .
t1
I
1
1
t11 !
1, !
l
1ti '
It
l
1
to
i
j'
IIt
i
1
1
Mtg. _
II
11W
fj..•-
M
i
e!
s
n,
SM
rstl
s..,
t:
atlatfr.
SWIM
MM.
Mine
MI
r*
Rtthrr
1
i
t
ftiii /
NRfW
tf.
fl
tf
m.
ffIMMO
rat
1fr
ft
7f
R1lt..
r1.
rsee
ff
ff1•
f
I
1 '.! : !:
1
dui
mff
f.
aN+.
fs
r1.
r,
t.
ot
nMls
sr.
fr.
nfrm.
I
1•
II,
tit
iji !; >~
91!
1 _
1
1
Gfof
iii
I: '
ilialiii "
1
1
ripe
f
I
J: :
yj
1 ,
1 ,
1! (' :
1
Jill
11
l
lti
1 ,;:
14.,
1!
i
14
1
it
ii • , ;
iii
r -
1
1
II „
41
4 .
1t
ofg •
I
Illik ,,
1%--
16.
1
r.
i!,//://
I:
I '.'
4
V47
1111
11 ''
w''.•;;;
Iho
titiuti...
li *...
t.
sizaltlitigo,
1
1:: ':'..
111
1: : '. .
44: ^ '
311111
i4vasure-
er
1
1-
miluoiroosv.
4-
zwilqiblimaritilith
ilegiow,
161,
0„.::„
0,
4%•!!!
tillt
i '
it::
1ii '! .
1
111111
t
11
Ili'
I11110
111.
ill
i'
ll;
1!
11
I , . .
11111
1
I
1i !
i1Ii
i.
fw
lir
1
t,
1,,
llt
11 •
j,
r
III
j
or,
ii
t
I
I
SI
1
11: ;
1
I#
tl
1III
1"
t ':!
t1i
jiii
ti1 !li
III
I
1 • ;.
ill'. ";
i };
111 ; .
t
l
4:i: : : '
i11oil111.
i.
i ' "'
i,
i •
I.
i ' (.
I
11 _•
1
4 ; % '
1ji1
j1 !
lj
1
1
I
i
I
r
uuuIiiht111 ,
l
j1
i1ilk
1
1
1111• . :
It,
t1.1.
III
I
ll
t )
I >
t
i:
1..
i : '
i•
t
1
1, .. , •
1
1
N
G. \
1 \
1
I.,
J
1!.." :
1.
11.
i11 .
1.
i .
1'
fI
1
iM
a
1 :
i
A4
e':' ;
A:
1f!
I :' : ' ,
1
t •/
I
1 • • . '
ti.
y
lift •
l• ..
r
1
11:
1; •
N=;
1tt11. .:
1 .
11t1 ..
11.. ,
1
i.
1
I
I
ail.-
it
1
t
i
1 .
f.
o
s
pr
ww
w
ww•
r'.
Itii•;;
1
11
i !
J
tl'
1
iIMS ..
w6f.
IMIMikr.
f
w..«
wr4,
l
rrs
tt'.
1 ,
1•
i
V
1 , .•
I
11
1 . .
1
Iwo
f .. ..
N.
MM
OM
f
M
Mp111111 =
re;
f1,•
r
p
V
4.
f
h
NN
M
f
MY• •,
1
r
I
44)
O
r
It
vt '
11
j1
J '
t
iltl
1 ' .'
1
i11/
1
1 .
t •
Itt1 '•
li
1!. .
1.,.•
1::
11. ..., ,, ,,..
let
111t. . , ,
1 ,
iti
il;
t +
11.
t
1+
5,
1,..
1:• ' •;:•. \ ..;! :
1 ,•
t
11:
1
1
i' ,: ,
11.
1. : :
I!
1
I11
is ,
ir/
11
1
1,..
1
1 '
ti •
t1 .
1!
1
1.
1' ,
t;
I:
I:
t: :\:
lt; ,
11,
11,.,,
s . • ...
i.
JI
1
1...:
I.. . .
t1{ ,.
t11
I
1
111111t11‘:
Ii"
i11: ;;:
I:
i1;
1:
1iti11.
ItI
I
ii1111;.
ff . ::
i111
1 , "' (
I1 ,
11
ALIi111i1:
1t1:, '
1 ::{:
i:
I:;
l4t•
i111.
11.
1{
1
1
i1 •
t
1 ..
1
0 ' 1 i ( 7vP)
EXIST VP NE SuPPc.) rS e S'- 03/y'' c-,..
1
i`_;. _..._.r1HT 11 io'- f /_
i (TYPE ,71
jrliiY
6, p
ka tt11
I it 11 •-• t
t
1.I i
II
1 li
t41. w '
11((
07 J.
r,
VVV%
1JJJ _.._._..__.
ql._._.
L_ y
am•
0 -2-• 0rr/
03 (0
ExIS / REINP, 5TI PEN:RS f .--'
a o L_--,--- NEW I? O. 3/
E a /a RtiNF
0 s, SYa F'NfR 5
Z tz r—
in
2
nr 2
Gal- ELLVATiON ' -f s-
I' GALE Vy" . I r-o'
OF R4,,,
THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
oNAL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
9A O FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593
p P
9
TSO SEPt°
4‘.'e)
April 21 , 1982
Ms . Hannah Kimball
Boeing Commercial Airplane C'Jmpany
P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62- 15
Seattle, WA 98124
RE: File No. SA-013-82 ; Boeing Commercial Airplane Company ;
Request for Site Approval .
Dear Ms . Kimball :
The Examiner' s Report regarding the referenced application which was
published on March 31 , 1982 has not been appealed within the 14-day
period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered
final and is being tramsitted to the Building & Zoning Department this
date for filing.1.
Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or
information is required.
Sincerely ,
1:::11X0L4'4"15''''
Fred J . Kaufman
Hearing Examiner
cc: Building & Zoning Department
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King
Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath
disposes and states:
That on the 31st day of March 19 82, affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing
a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the
parties of record in the below entitled application or petition.
Sk
Subscribed and sworn this 31 day of 11Z,r< x 19 $2.
Notary Public in and for tAe State of
Washington, residing at QPm<nyi
Application, Petition or Case: Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. ; SA-013-82
The mina e4 contain a tis,t o6 the pa tia o>j second. )
March 31 , 1982
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND DECISION .
APPLICANT: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company FILE NO. SA-013-82
LOCATION: Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Airport and adjacent
to the Cedar River bridge.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site approval to install an 11-foot
high, 300-foot long blast fence at an existing test position
and to extend existing air and electrical utilities. -
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building & Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with11
conditions.
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval of conditional use permit.
BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department preliminary report was
DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on March 24, 1982.
PUBLIC HEARING:After reviewing the Building & Zoning Department report,
examining available information on file with the application,
and field checking the property and surrounding area, the
Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as
follows:
The hearing was opened on March 30, 1982 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
The Examiner noted that the application should have been processed under the Conditional
Use Permit provisions denoted in Section 4-710. I . i . (2) , specifically required for
facilities which service and store airplanes. However, because public notice for the
hearing had adequately described the request, he felt that satisfaction of the legal
publication requirements had been met.
Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, presented the Building & Zoning Department staff
report, and entered the following exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Building & Zoning
Department report and other pertinent
documents
Exhibit #2: Site Plan of Apron "A" showing proposal
Mr. Blaylock reviewed the conditional use permit criteria denoted in Section 4-722(F)
of the Zoning Code, advising that the subject request meets applicable code requirements
for approval of a permit. He also indicated that noise will most likely be reduced by
the proposal due to the current manufacture of quieter planes proposed for testing on
the site.
Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding provision of additional landcape screening
along the Cedar River, Mr. Blaylock stated that because public access is not allowed
along the western bank of the river, landscaping has not been necessary or required in
the past. However, if such a proposal is desired in the future, it would be appropriate
for the Boeing Company to landscape the entire bank at one time.
The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was:
Hannah Kimball
Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62-15
Seattle, WA 98124
Ms. Kimball concurred in the recommendations contained in the staff report. She
described the proposal to allow turning movement of the airplane 90 degrees to facilitate 1
testing in a different direction; and reiterated Mr. Blaylock's comments regarding
decrease in noise due to modifications in later airplane models.
The Examiner requested further comments. Since none were offered, the hearing regarding tkl
File No. SA-013-82 was closed by the Examiner at 9:23 a.m.
III
to
SA-013-82 Page Two
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner ,
now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1 . The applicant, Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, filed a request to construct
additional jet engine test site blast fencing.
2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Building
and Zoning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the
record as Exhibit #1 .
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971 , RCW 43.21C, as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has
been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) ,
responsible official .
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed.
6. The subject property is located on the east side of the Renton Municipal Airport
at Apron "A" just north of the Cedar River bridge.
7. The site is flat and is currently used by the Boeing Company for the testing of
jet engines. An existing blast fence is already located on the site. The current
fence is oriented to the east and is used to deflect the exhaust of jet engines
during testing procedures .
8. The applicant wants to be able to test engines in other than an east-west
orientation and proposed to erect an additional 300 feet of fencing around the site
along the north (100 feet) , northeast (60 feet) , and south (140 feet) perimeter.
9. The access road from the bridge across the Cedar River is located immediately south
of the subject site and the fence would provide additional protection for users of
the access road.
10. The additional fencing may provide limited noise reduction since additional portions
of the site will be fenced but the main purpose remains the deflection of the exhaust
from the engines.
11 . The site is within 200 feet of the Cedar River shoreline and is subject to a
Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit. That permit has been approved
by the city and no appeal has been filed on that action.
12. The subject site is zoned P-1 (Public/Quasi-Public) and the Comprehensive Plan and
the Master Plan study for the airport both indicate that the site is suitable for
airport related uses including the manufacturing and servicing of airplanes.
13. There will be no expansion of the facilities beyond the increase of the blast fence.
CONCLUSIONS:
1 . The subject proposal appears to serve the public use and interest. The site is
zoned for public and quasi-public uses and Section 4-710( I ) (i ) (2) permits the
establishment of airport related functions at the Renton Municipal Airport.
2. The proposed use is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and the Master Plan
study for the airport. It is also compatible with and has co-existed with the
other airport related uses in the vicinity.
3. While the proposal will not add any new uses to the airport it may reduce noise
levels of jet engine testing procedures because of the additional buffering
provided by the three-fourths wrap-around detail of the additional blast fencing.
4. The proposal will not add to the traffic or parking problems of the airport, and
no additional employment opportunities will be provided by the proposal .
DECISION:
The request is approved and a conditional use permit is granted.
SA-013-82 Page Three
ORDERED THIS 31st day of March, 1982.
Fred J. Ka an
Land Use Hearing Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 31st day of March, 1982 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party
of record:
Hannah Kimball , Boeing Commercial Airplane Company,
P.O. Box 3707, M.S. 62-15, Seattle, WA 98124
TRANSMITTED THIS 31st day of March, 1982 to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
David Clemens, Policy Development Director
Members, Renton Planning Commission
Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director
Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Renton Record-Chronicle
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before April 14, 1982. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error
in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available
at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen
14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the
specific errors relied upon by such appellant , and the Examiner may, after review of the
record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that
such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting
other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in
the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in
said department.
CITY OF RENTON
LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
MARCH 30, 1982
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 9 : 00 a.m. :
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING
The applications listed are in order of application number
only and not necessarily the order in which they will be
heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion
of the Hearing Examiner.
SA-013-82 BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY
SM-012-82 Application to install 300 L.F. additional
blast fence at existing test position andI
extend existing air and electrical utilities ;
located at apron "A" , east side of Renton
Municipal Airport, adjacent to S. Cedar River
Bridge.
BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
MARCH 30 , 1982
APPLICANT : BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY
FILE NUMBER : SA-013-82
A . SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST :
The applicant requests site approval to install an 11-foot
high 300-foot long blast fence at an existing test position
and to extend existing air and electrical utilities .
B . GENERAL INFORMATION :
1 . Owner of Record : BOEING COMMERCIAL
AIRPLANE COMPANY
2 . Applicant : BOEING COMMERCIAL
AIRPLANE COMPANY
3 . Location :
Vicinity Map Attached ) Apron "A" , east side
of Renton Municipal
Airport and adjacent
to Cedar River bridge .
4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal
description is available
on file in the Renton I'
Building & Zoning
Department .
5 . Size of Property : 87 acres .
6 . Access :Via East Perimeter Road .
7. Existing Zoning : P-1 , Public Use District .
8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : P-1 ; H-1 , Heavy Industry.
9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Public/Quasi Public .
10 . Notification: The applicant was notified
in writing of the hearing
date. Notice was properly
published in the Daily
Record Chronicle on
March 15 , 1982 , and posted
in three places on or
near the site as required
by City Ordinance on
March 19 , 1982 .
C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : V
The subject site is part of the original plat of the
City of Renton .
PRELIMINARY REPOI TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
BOEING COMMERCIAL nIRPLANE COMPANY
MARCH 30 , 1982
PAGE TWO
D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1 . Topography : The subject site is essentially level .
2 . Soils : Urban Land (Ur) is soil that has been modified
by disturbance of the natural layers with additions
of fill material several feet thick to accommodate
large industrial and housing installations . The
erosion hazard is slight to moderate.
3 . Vegetation : Most of the area is paved and very
little natural vegetation remains .
4. Wildlife : What vegetation remains is not suitable
for wildlife habitat .
5 . Water : No surface water was observed on the subject
site, although the Cedar River is adjacent on the
east .
6 . Land Use : The subject site is presently used as
a test facility for aircraft engines and associated
equipment . Similar land uses and/or functions
are found on the adjacent properties .
E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
This are of the Municipal Airport is occupied primarily
by the Boeing Company and their 757 commercial airplane
operation .
F . PUBLIC SERVICES:
1 . Water and Sewer : The Municipal Airport has numerous
water and sewer lines crossing the subject site .
2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the City of Renton
as per ordinance requirements .
3 . Transit : METRO Transit Route ##107 operates along
Park Avenue North within 1/2 mile to the east of
the subject site .
4 . Schools : Not applicable.
5 . Recreation : Not applicable.
G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1 . Section 4-710 , Public Use District .
2 . Section 4-710-3 , Review of Nonmunicipal Improvements .
H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER
OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT:
1 . Policies Element , Comprehensive Plan ( 1981 ) , Industrial
Policy , 6 . A . 3 .
I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT:
1 . Natural Systems : Minor .
2 . Population/Employment : Minor .
3 . Schools : Not applicable.
PRELIMINARY REPORT T 'HE HEARING EXAMINER
BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANT COMPANY
MARCH 30 , 1982
PAGE THREE
4 . Social : Not applicable.
5 . Traffic : Minor .
J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance
and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended ,
RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance was issued
for the subject proposal by the ERC on March 15 , 1982.
K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1 . City of Renton Building & Zoning Department .
2 . City of Renton Engineering Division .
3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division .
4. City of Renton Utilities Division .
5 . City of Renton Fire Department .
6 . City of Renton Parks Department .
7 . City of Renton Policy Development Department .
L . DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS :
1 . The proposed use can be considered consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan and rezoning designations
of Public/Quasi-Public and P-1 , Public Use , respectively
for the site and surrounding area .
2 . The proposal is compatible with the existing land
uses on surrounding and adjacent properties .
3 . In this application the proponent is seeking to
modify the Apron "A" Engine Test Position by constructing
additional blast fence along the north and south
sides of the site which is located just west and
north of the access bridge. The fencing will be
11 feet high and consist of approximately 300 lineal
feet in three sections designed as follows :
a) 140 ' along the southerly side
b ) 60 ' along the northeasterly side
c ) 100 ' along the northerly side .
This project will supplement the existing 160 '
of fencing lying along the east perimeter of the
site . It will also serve to enclose the area for
safety purposes as have the other testing sites
been. Such an enclosure should be sufficient for
public health and safety and is consistent with
precautions taken in the past by the company in
testing similar aircraft and related industrial
equipment .
4. A Shoreline Management Substantial Development
Permit is required because the additional fencing
is located within 200 feet of the shoreline of
the Cedar River . This has been applied for and
is being processed under SM-012-82 .
5 . Utilities Engineering notes that a City water line
is close to the proposed fencing. The applicant
is advised to consult with this division prior
to any construction activity .
PRELIMINARY REPO TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
BOEING COMMERCIA. .AIRPLANE COMPANY
MARCH 30 , 1982
PAGE FOUR
6 . Once the fencing is installed , it should be painted
with a similar color as existing fencing to be
consistent with past construction.
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS :
Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that
this request be approved subject to:
1 . Processing and issuance of the Shoreline Management
Substantial Development Permit of L-4 .
2 . Consultation with the Utilities Engineering Division
regarding the City water line of L-5 .
3 . Painting the fencing similar to that previously
installed .
1-:-...tinICA\\, \ i u nt-13
4._
I
2.
wr.
1 P
Nr
i-— i- .
j I.
y_ i • i.
rL._ -•_•.11.
2 T7 IZ
2 1
fi6F
If L. 1 a
11
43 . ; ___
J__. :_ 1111
1 ,1 Q L 1.2 44t- -rllitPnrtiru1
i :..,,i E.-f. 11,iL) o i
IW,' C7l <if>b0/f1
O Fa 77 tr
1VIMli'.,. — ..,
ck „
c
V.. 7L.__'-
r.
sr.:,..,.)
i i, .1.- rv...-.. t.: ...T,_ . 22., , ',M. g...1.7_45p\„.
Ir-.I „ Elie....
4, _i .ii .7741 ;-,4.•el m, .m ... ,!I,. I,i..,:„,
1-- r1- o
L Ii`±f !. ;
46* ''.-'. '
Ar--' - , '
ti1i ,i ' '
1
N /' M F, SC*0°'
1 A
t A I i !-.• - ••• ...'r.. ,
hNN#4., .
D
7. Pll l7 K
i ,rti no 40
r
f mt
J
r
ice
S.f NrNR JMNr
7•
y O
1 * \ A
1
1.
APPL I CANT BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY TOTAL AREA 0.87 ACRES
PRINCIPAL ACCESS EAST PERIMETER ROAD
EXISTING ZONING P—1
EXISTING USE AIRCRAFT ENGINE TEST FACILITY
i
PROPOSED USE CHAINING OF
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN PUBLIC/QUASI PUBLIC
COMMENTS i
A•viaruri
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: SITE APPROVAL SA-013-82
Location: Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S . Cedar
River Bridge.
Applicant: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
IQ:public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-10-82
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Utilities Eng. Division 3-30-82
EfFire Department
Parks Department
Building Department
Police Department
Others: Policy Development
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED INWRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: tom
Approved Approved with Conditions [' Not Approved
DATE: /? 3
CSignatureofDirectororAuhorizeRepresentative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: t{Tlc-lZY (JAY
Approved Approved with Conditions [pot Approved
e1 — Ite_ ro_t e.
na
DATE: 3/r` g
Signaturetore of Direct or Authorized Representative
r UTILITY APPROVAL SI;E!':CT TO
3/T/fg
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - WATER NO •
LATE COMERS ACREEIIENT • SEWER AD
SYSTEM Di.n.1 oPAIENT CHARCE • WATER No
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARCE • SEWER 1 NO
SPECIAL ASaESSMENT AREA CHARGE • Yii.;ER Np
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SL:;ER Aip
APPROVED !ATER Fit,;i NO
APPROVED SEWER PLAN NO
APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LCCATIOAS
NO
BY FIRE DEPT.
FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS No
evision 3/1981
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application : SITE APPROVAL SA-013-82
Location: Apron "A". east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S . Cedar
River Bridge.
Applicant: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
IQ:OPublic Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-10-82
D Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
Utilities Eng. Division•3-30-82
Fire Department
Parks Department
Building Department
rErPolice Department
Others: Policy Development
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED INWRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: rieie/;5
Approved CR Approved with Conditions (] Not Approved
CCJ /c. G- 7/7/S %t/E?7'J L57 /7-17' i9 / C'/('E a cC
L-rC/t e `J-6- 7/rY/T /VC/S C" 2 L%&-L 7//6-- Ce- /?7(
0 ex 7/'/1/4- ? . / C n/L, O w/t-i S ez)dp
7?-71/9 t/eyre-JSC-- T//& /'O/SS L LUez,
Signature of Director or utho zed Representative
DATE: MiPeC'iE - Z
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
11 y,,Oroved ElApproved with Conditions (]Not Approved
DATE: 3-- y61:2SignatureofDirectororAuthorizedRepresentative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:a
Approved El Approv ith Conditions [] Not Approved
CDATE: (_.. — --.1F2__.)
Signature of it tor or Authoriz d Representative
REVIEW G DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :_ _
Approved 0 Approved with Conditions El Not Approved
7
ejiat(i DATE: -,-- 2--
Signat re of Director or Authorized Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION• '.-79/e2eerir 9
Approved 0 Approved with Conditions [] Not Approved
r lit .' DATE: 3- 9-82.Signature of D' ctor Authorizedfresentative 1/
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION• y-3
El-Appr oved I:Approved with Conditions Not Approved
Signature of Director or Authorizedresep nRe
l r I DATE: .3 //8/Z
ative
revision 3/1981
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: SITE APPROVAL SA-013-82
Location: Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S . Cedar
River Bridge.
Applicant: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
TQ:Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-10-82
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 3-30-$2UtilitiesEng. Division
Fire Department
Parks Department
Building Department
Police Department
Others: Policy Development
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED INWRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON
1
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 7__9//76erir7n
Approved [' Approved with Conditions Not Approved
i71/l7 DATE: 3-- 9-8ZSignatureofD' ctor Authorized .resentative mil/d
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 2--atjje,C s-7,js-, P --.1`•`
pproved ['Approved with Conditions ['Not Approved
Zd;, ''', ',L_—,k() 1 I DATE: . /e'zSignatureofDirectororAuthorizedRepresenative
FIB DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No(s) : SA-013-82, SM-012-82
Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-012-82
Description of Proposal : Modify apron "A"
engine test position.
Proponent : BOEING COMMERCIAL
AIRPLANE COMPANY
Location of Proposal :Apron "A" , east side
of Renton Municipal
Airport, adjacent
to S. Cedar River
Bridge.
Lead Agency: RENTON BUILDING &
ZONING DEPARTMENT
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on March 10, 1982,
following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building
Zoning Department . Oral comments were accepted from: Ronald
Nelson, David Clemens, Richard Houghton, Garry Norris, Robert
Bergstrom, Camille Radcliffe, Roger Blaylock, and Jerry Lind.
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings
of the ERC on application ECF-012-82 are the following:
1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by:
Lee T. Hedin DATED: February 19 , 1982
2) Applications : SA-013-82, SM-012-82
3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance:
Traffic Engineering Division, Utility Engineering Division,
Design Engineering Division, Policy Development Department,
Fire Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Police
Department and Building & Zoning Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined
this development does not have significant adverse impact on the
environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) .
This decision was made after review by the lead agency of
a complete environmental checklist and other information
on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance:
Will not adversely affect adjacent properties and that the
following requirement shall be complied with: Must meet
with F.A.A. approval.
Signatures :
Ronald G. Nelson aViR. Clemens
Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director
7
r t; ,.
Richard C. Houghton
Public Works Director
DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 15, 1982
EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: March 29 , 1982
Date circulated : rcarch 8, 1982
March 10, 1982Commentsdue :
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 012 _ 82
APPLICATION No (s) . SA-013-82 SM-012-82
PROPONENT : Boein Commercial Air lane Com an
PROJECT TITLE : Modify A ron "A" Engine Test Position
Brief Description of Project : Install 300 L.F. additional blastfence ( 11 ' high) at existing tes posy ion an ex en existingairandelectricalutilities.
LOCATION : Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Air ortadjacentoeariverlrge.SITE AREA : 0. 87 acres BUILDING AREA gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO1 ) Topographic changes : X
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X
3) Water & water courses : X
4 ) Plant life :X
5 ) Animal life : X
6) Noise :
X
7 ) Light & glare : X
8 ) Land Use ; north
Anrteast :
south: Airport
west : Airport
Land use conflicts : None
View obstruction : None
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : 1X
15 ) Energy :
X
16 ) Utilities:
X
17) Human health:
X
18) Aesthetics:
4
19) Recreation:
20) Archeology/history :1
I X
COMMENTS:
Signatures:
Ronald G. Nelson vid R. ClemensBuildingOfficial
Policy Development Director
Richard C. Houghton,, :
Public Works Director
NOTICE OF' PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING
EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 30, 1982, AT 9 :00
A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION:
BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY
Application to install 300 L.F. additional blast fence
at existing test position and extend existing air and
electrical utilities, file SA-013-82; located at apron
A" , east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent
to S. Cedar River Bridge.
Legal descriptions of the file noted above are on file in
the Renton Building and Zoning Department.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE
PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 30, 1982, AT 9 :00
A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
PUBLISHED: March 15, 1982 RONALD G. NELSON
BUILDING AND ZONING
DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE
ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to
before me, a Notary Public, in
and for, the State of Washington
residing in King County, on the
12th day of March, 1982.
SIGNED: ,ifk,e-A6•449r,__
w
FIB. DECLARATION OF NOR-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No (s) : SA-013-82, SM-012-82
Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-012-82
Description of Proposal : Modify apron "A"
engine test position.
Proponent: BOEING COMMERCIAL
AIRPLANE COMPANY
Location of Proposal : Apron "A" , east side
of Renton Municipal
Airport, adjacent
to S. Cedar River
Bridge.
Lead Agency: RENTON BUILDING &
ZONING DEPARTMENT
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on March 10, 1982,
following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building
Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Ronald
Nelson, David Clemens, Richard Houghton, Garry Norris, Robert
Bergstrom, Camille Radcliffe, Roger Blaylock, and Jerry Lind.
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings
of the ERC on application ECF-012-82 are the following:
1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by:
Lee T. Hedin DATED: February 19 , 1982
2) Applications : SA-013-82, SM-012-82
3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance:
Traffic Engineering Division, Utility Engineering Division,
Design Engineering Division, Policy Development Department ,
Fire Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Police
Department and Building & Zoning Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined
this development does not have significant adverse impact on the
environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) .
This decision was made after review by the lead agency of
a complete environmental checklist and other information
on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance:
Will not adversely affect adjacent properties and that the
following requirement shall be complied with: Must meet
with F.A.A. approval.
Signatures :
7C /)?k4Pf -"" 7 17/ '
li
40%
Ronald G. Nelson aVi . Cle ens
Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director
it
Richard C. Houghton
Public Works Director
DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 15, 1982
EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: March 29, 1982
Date circulated : ..,rch 8, 1982
C March 10 1982ommentsdue :
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 012 - 82
APPLICATION No (s) . SA-013-82, SM-012-82
PROPONENT : Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
PROJECT TITLE : Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position
Brief Description of Project : Install 300 L.F. additional blastfence (11 ' high) at existing test position and extend existingairandelectricalutilities.
LOCATION : Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Airport,adjacent to S. Cedar River Bridge.
SITE AREA : 0. 87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : X
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X
3 ) Water & water courses : X
4 ) Plant life :X
5 ) Animal life : X
6) Noise :
X
7) Light & glare :_ X
8 ) Land Use ; north : Airport
east : Airport
south : Airport
west : Airport
Land use conflicts : None
View obstruction : None
9) Natural resources :
x
10 ) Risk of upset :
x
11 ) Population/Employment : x
12 ) Number of Dwellings :x i
13 ) Trip ends CITE ) :
x
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
x
15 ) Energy :
x
16 ) Utilities:
x
17 ) Human health:
X
18) Aesthetics :
X
19) Recreation:
x
20) Archeology/history : x
COMMENTS:
Signatures:
Ronald G. Nelson vid R. Clemens
Building Official Policy Development Director
Richard C. Houghton,,
Public Works Director
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final
declaration of non-significance for the following project :
BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY
Application to install 300 L. F. additional blast fence
at existing test position and extend existing air and
electrical utilities, file ECF-012-82, SA-013-82, SM-012-82;
located at apron "A" , east side of Renton Municipal
Airport, adjacent to S. Cedar River Bridge.
Further information regarding this action is available in
the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton,
Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed
with the Hearing Examiner by March 29, 1982.
Published: March 15, 1982
i
Qevision 3/1981
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: SITE APPROVAL SA-013-82
Location: Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S . Cedar
River Bridge.
Applicant: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
TO:public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-10-82
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:3-30-82UtilitiesEng. Division
Fire Department
Parks Department
Building Department
Police Department
Others: Policy Development
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:9,1#7 e "/n9
Approved [' Approved with Conditions Not Approved
DATE: 9-8Z
Signature of D'1ctor Authorized resentative rn4 r l/
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 7`-a2,74 s2gjs•,
Eig‘oved ['Approved with Conditions [' Not Approved
64 rI DATE: Z
Signature of Director or Authorized Represen ative
Revision 3/1981
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: SITE APPROVAL SA-013-82
Location: Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S . Cedar
I
River Bridge.
Applicant: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
IQ:Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-10-82
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 3-30-82UtilitiesEng. Division
EfFire Department
Parks Department
Building Department
Police Department
Others: Policy Development
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED INWRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved Approved with Conditions [' Not Approved
DATE: // C'M .Signature of Director or Au horize Representative
ICI
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 4/L-(-cy pv'T
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
ei, datct, delyae_ =6- czA4ou R,444°/a4t.--44 611-L)11
eit)(1— rot' 0..
7_ 4.1-2.t.et .
DATE: 3/r< gZ
Signature of Direct or Authorized Representative
UTILITY APPROVAL Si 8i 6T
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - WATER M •
LATE COMERS i.CREEMEIET - SEWER tD
SYSTEM DE':E'.;;PAIENT CHARCE• WATER
1
No
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARCE • SEWER I NO
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHANGEW`;ER ND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SL'XF.R p'D
APPROVED WATER CIA NO _
APPROVED SEWER PLAN NO
APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS
ND
BY FIRE DEPT.
FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS No
revision 3/1981
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: SITE APPROVAL SA-013-82
Location: Apron "A". east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S . Cedar
River Bridge.
Applicant: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
IQ:OPublic Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-10-82
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:3-30-82UtilitiesEng. Division
Fire Department
Parks Department
Building Department
Police Department
tSfOthers: Policy Development
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:( „ 4 „
Approved Approv ith Conditions Not Approved
DATE: 25'—
Signature of 1r tor or Authorfz d Representative
REVIEW G DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
EfApproved Approved with Conditions [' Not Approved
DATE: 1 -4'1/-'2-
Signat re of Director or Authorized Representative
evision 3/1981
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: SITE APPROVAL SA-013-82
Location: Apron "A". east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S . Cedar
River Bridge.
Applicant: Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
TO:Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-10-82
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 3-30-82UtilitiesEng. Division
Fire Department
Parks Department
Building Department
Police Department
0 Others: Policy Development
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: MeKS
Approved El Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved
Wiz- 4- 7/7/S 41t t) 7z$ 9—/? 4/c/P i ,de- 0fC
77J /U 4/s(1 ,z & L ar.) 71/L
6N 7/f/I/4- ?C f}/U 6r/V 4 u%/ti eS tz).M"P
T/-M t /r cc)" 410 i" /111 C/f'eJgsC T//(" y0/5 -Z c: ''L,
2JJ DATE: /P/Pf CYK — gSignatureofDirectororuthozedRepresentative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
I y.=roved []Approved with Conditions []Not Approved
DATE: 3-
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
pF R
ti
4.4 40 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTt$
RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR
09 cok MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540
o94TF0 SEPlE°
5‘
P
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
MARCH 12, 1982
Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
P.O. Box 3707 , Mailstop 62-15
Seattle, Washington 98124
Re: Application to install 300 L.F. additional blast fence
at existing test position and extend existing air and
electrical utilities, file SA-013-82; located at apron
A" , east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent
to S. Cedar River Bridge.
Gentlemen:
The Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted
the above mentioned application on March 10, 1982. A public
hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been
set for March 30, 1982, at 9 : 00 a.m.
Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present.
All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing.
If you have any further questions, please call the Renton
Building and Zoning Department, 235-2550.
Very truly yours,
ReCtleCrEtell"k
Roger J. Blaylock
Zoning Administrator
RJB:cl
7 CITY 3F RENT '!"
0 s9Jo' : 4•.co sEe/t-
4 . 9 ,. Mr-4.,.
4 a
11p;:' ...us.. ,•.),ri.4,41111 IF -.lc, . :;.-,0-,-, ,• .THIS •Mat.rft ' 4 A . '; - •
GENERAL LC CAT/ON AN /CI AV DR
LOCATED AT APRON "A", EAST SIDE OF RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT :
ADJACENT TO S . CEDAR RIVER BRIDGE.
LEGAL CESCRIPT ION ON FraLE
RENTCIN PL ANNINIG DE PAR'TIA ENTv
IS P CI ST V.:lip TO NOTIFY
0 F
A ir.i.Or% HE4•.',.•,.,,,' ., li thirii, 44 arm
TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CAMBER
a.,
MUNICIPAL BUILDING a,
ON MARCH Zi332 BEG AI NIN G AT.,...„.',ii,„tw .., ,f4a„M.L.. .
P
CONCERNING...- , TEM r--
r • .-
0,••.{ I , . .. , ' , ,. .
l
J REZONE
4. ..-,. .,
i: ,;*!...„,SPECjA L 4 ERIVIiT
4; , 4;,.. /if- ..... . .e-y .. .. .,... ... • ... .,.-...
4 . ..
4 _.•..). ,.
i.:'14.,. .; .. ... •,..
BITE APPROVAL.
w11SIAADR T. PLAT, r°' SUOLI1ViNiILlo
LAININED uNIT Drlialitmell', :i.:' ;... ii. .- ni:-...i 7''.,:
j
1... 4114 . .,. :FFIllt .t , ''ENV;FICINMENTA', :-.'-':, 7iskiftsitcirlitlatk*ri jth.,Tr• * ._OF: Li !#=,1 ON I RC ANT L-,.. N litz;r4 I F,IC:.„.41r4,,;-'
DIRECT Arlit3F-1A 0,,,,,,S • TO ir,-., I-iL: HEAR IN twal... .•,...- i- s,...-:•-':, '- • .-
L '
EXAMINER
oonewis
Fon FOR nil:R INF CRIVIATION CALL THE C:,::!'l "''z' cot mem-rcoki
PLANNINV r.t ii:PAPTiVIE KIN AT 2 i5- SC, d ,,
THIS NOVICE ,r--,..przair 7'0 0-3F REM..*:.,,i1V FtiZIAPATILtrwilvi' '.:-
AtF'..1.--F0 IP i 7 An C...1144:L: --, . ' ,''''''':•*- ' - -,!..
Date circulated : March 8, 1982 Comments due : March 10, 1982
ERVIROMIHE\ITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 012 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-013-82, SM-012-82
PROPONENT : Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
PROJECT TITLE : Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position
Brief Description of Project : Install 300 L.F. additional blast fence (11' high)
at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities.
LOCATION : Apron "A" east side of Renton Municipal Airport. adiacent to S. Cedar
River Bridge.
SITE AREA : 0.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross )
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses : L/
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :L/
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts : NE-
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy : V _
16 ) Utilities : f
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics : L
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSIl- DOS More Information
Reviewed by : e•
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulated : March 8, 1982 Comments due : March 10, 1982
ERVIRO\NEM\TAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 012 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-013-82, SM-012-82
PROPONENT : Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
PROJECT TITLE : Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position
Brief Description of Project : Install 300 L.F. additional blast fence (11 ' high)
at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities.
LOCATION : Apron "A". east side of Renton Municipal Airport. adiacent to S. Cedar
River Bridge.
SITE AREA : 0.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross )
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : r
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation :DNSI DOS More Information
Reviewed by :L/ " itle
Date : 3 ' j 8
FORM: ERC-06
4
20Mt 4G,J
Date circulated : March 8, 1982 Comments due : March 10, 1982
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 012 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-013-82, SM-012-82
PROPONENT : Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
PROJECT TITLE : Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position
Brief Description of Project : Install 300 L.F. additional blast fence (11 ' high)
at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities.
LOCATION : Apron "A" east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adiacent to S. CedarRiverBridge.
SITE AREA : 0.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross )
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : X
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise : K
7 ) Light & glare : K
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :X
12 ) Number of Dwellings : x
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : I
15 ) Energy : x
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation :
j
I OS More Information
Reviewed by : tle : 01/ -b 7)/G
Date : y 171
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulated : March 8, 1982 Comments due : March 10, 1982
E\VIRO\INEIWTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 012 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-013-82, SM-012-82
PROPONENT : Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
PROJECT TITLE : Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position
Brief Description of Project : Install 300 L.F. additional blast fence (11 ' high)
at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities .
LOCATION : Apron "A" east side of Renton Municipal Airport. adiacent to S. Cedar
River Bridge.
SITE AREA : 0.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross )
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INF0
1 ) Topographic changes : v/
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction : 7
9 ) Natural resources :
r
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : 1
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
I
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history : f
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : illii DO More Information
Aqr c,
Reviewed by : ANL ,W 0-1 , Title :.„ F ZX.V 745t:
01AliffilyDate : j
r
FORM: ERC-06
FgK,
Date circulated : march 8, 1982 Comments clue : March 10, 1982
ERVIRO\I9ENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 012 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-013-82, SM-012-82
PROPONENT : Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
PROJECT TITLE : Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position
Brief Description of Project : Install 300 L.F. additional blast fence (11 ' high)
at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities.
LOCATION : Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S. Cedar
River Bridge.
SITE AREA : 0.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7) Light & glare : i
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : 1
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS : 77/ NO/!' f& ir? THE ciGyt 7 r,„06_S
vt'R '( D/57"0R3/iv6- 7O PewPLG- GSiiv 7frc-i" • C ea/f/
T Rol r T//C' 70171 / f f rf,v7!/7.re- Ti'/l/c.
S /Ai /f C1,o/ii c'iv// . i s r itRe.P f' /4 ROpi,NC rI,zefv!.?
P N1. j, 0 +r Pe-2 L L 7h'-R- 56'- /9/1) // ceirh-SE /N^N!J/nee-n ,f Tes75
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information
Reviewed by : le4Alit I itle :
Date : O/9A1 —e2
FORM: ERC-06
ra,1G4
Date circulated : March 8, 1982 Comments due : March 10, 1982
ENIVIR0MIIlE\TAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 012 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-013-82, SM-012-82
PROPONENT : Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
PROJECT TITLE : Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position
Brief Description of Project : Install 300 L.F. additional blast fence (11 ' high)
at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities .
LOCATION : Apron "A" east side of Renton Municipal Airport. adiacent to S. Cedar
River Bridge.
SITE AREA : 0.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross )
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :V
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses : 4
4 ) Plant life : t /
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare : t
8 ) Land Use ; north : 4p)/ jaalr ee)
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :XZ,.
View obstruction : 4id
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset : V/
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : I
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities : v
17) Human health :
J
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Oily/o/ir4 4,/if Rice aeil
4?
711e/eW gtO-A2/4.3
Recommendation : NSI DOS Mor Information
Reviewed by : Title : /'/ A/4—
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
1
Olt L.,ill S
Date circulated : March 8, 1982 Comments due : March 10, 1982
ENVIRONIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 012 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-013-82, SM-012-82
PROPONENT : Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
PROJECT TITLE : Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position
Brief Description of Project : Install 300 L.F. additional blast fence (11' high) 1
at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities.
LOCATION : Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Airport. adiacent to S. Cedar
River Bridge.
SITE AREA : 0.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (°o) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset : l
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : 1
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
r
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation : V .
20 ) Archeology/history : I
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : D DOS More Informa tion
Reviewed by : NAIL AILib..-- litle : L 2/ 1/ A'
Date : 3fr(t
FORM: ERC-06
TRAGIC.
Date circulated : March 8, 1982 Comments due : March 10, 1982
ENVIRONIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 012 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-013-82, SM-012-82
PROPONENT : Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
PROJECT TITLE : Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position
Brief Description of Project : Install 300 L.F. additional blast fence (11' high)
at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities.
LOCATION : Apron "A" east side of Renton Municipal Airport. adjacent to S. cedar
River Bridge.
SITE AREA : 0.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset : 4--
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts : 4/4-
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information
Reviewed by : litle :
Date : F/7/ /7/71----
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulated : March 8, 1982 Comments due : March 10, 1982
ENVIIRONMEINITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 012 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-013-82, SM-012-82
PROPONENT : Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
PROJECT TITLE : Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position
Brief Description of Project : Install 300 L.F. additional blast fence (11' high)
at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities.
LOCATION : Apron "A", east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adiacent to S. Cedar
River Bridge.
SITE AREA : 0.87 acres BUILDING AREA (gross )
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information
Reviewed by : Title :
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
ENVIRONNENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
MARCH 10, 1982
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 10 : 00 A.M. :
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
APPEALS
I
ECF-636-80 SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION
AAD-010-82 Appeal regarding the use of leased property
SA-126-80 for purposes of off-street parking ; located
at vicinity of 650 S.W. 7th Street.
ECF-013-81 HOMECRAFT LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC.
AAD-011-82 Appeal regarding off-site improvement
SA-010-81 requirements; located between N.E. 3rd
Street and N.E. 4th Street and Edmonds
Avenue N.E.
PENDING BUSINESS
ECF-008-82 CENTENNIAL VILLAS, INC.
B-271 Application for building permit of an
80-unit retirement facility; property
located at S.W. Victoria Street and Hardie
Avenue S.W.
ECF-010-82 EMMA CUGINI
SP-012-82 Application for fill and grade permit;
located south of N.E. 4th Street and
southeasterly of 3rd Street.
NEW BUSINESS
ECF-012-82 BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE CO.
SA-013-82 Application to install 300 L.F. additional
SM-012-82 blast fence at existing test position
and extend existing air and electrical
utilities ; located at apron "A" , east
side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent
to S. Cedar River Bridge.
1
CITY OF RENTON
CITY OF MINTON
APPLICATION o 111 1 tE
SITE APPROVAL FEB 191882
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
File No. SA- ,0f3 - Fs.` Filing Date 7— S"0""
DO
Application Fee $ Receipt No. -/.
Environmental Review Fee $ ljd.
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :
1. Name Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. Phone 237-1013
Address P. 0. Box 3707, M/S: 62-15, Seattle, Wa. 98124
2 . Property location Apron "A" , east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to
S. Cedar River Bridge.
3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary)Property
leased from City of Renton; legal description on file with City.
4. Number of acres or square feet 0.87 acres Present zoning
P1
5 . What do you propose to develop on this property?
Install 300 L.F. additional
blast fence at existing test position and extend existing air and electrical utilities{,.
6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application :
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , 91
existing structures , easements , and other
Scale
factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 '
B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 '
C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning
on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 '
D. Building height and area (existing and proposed)
7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION :
Date Approved
Date Denied
Date Appealed
Appeal Action
Remarks
Planning Dept.
Rev, 1-77
VICINITY MAP
z
F-
rr
0
x
t 08
ii1
1 •
1
40 4 I
I
I1 . i
1 69-01
I t
9-01 99-01~
1
I99-01 '------
1 1Ls
14(....,_
Z\_
p ^
4
0 N M
4
aIlit\
li
m••i••t''..-
6-0----
t-.I
1,
i
poo
7U1 'I, II\-1 Q 9o—
OlrjILX
00 0 I
U
R
a
0
C I.
0 I,
c,
V---r.
10,
o
Iv—
a,- lik g
B ; •o
AVM 1LO4 WIV
VICINITY MAP
x
I-
X
0
z
i
t N
AK11
A31 • (
1 4
1
6fl-Ol
1
d_-
II
99-01 09_01
t 99-01
It
1. L9-01i'99-01 I
a 2 ;
d2s
01 1-1
I
poo
t1
M4.I
ram-
L
II{
119-v t 1
0
II
1.4
J 1
J
Iotill t3
z a
1giczS/
i 0 Or.
OWCITY OF RENTON 41—,
9 I. % M rg % HIA M
IIII-----.B an
AVM 1NOdl1111I
BI.ELGING/ZONING DEPT.
1„,i,,41•H17 71. ..1i ;1:161..: r11 ' !1.l.11. . .. 111 . r r rr
i... •1 1 .; 1.1 1. ., . . .. .1 . i i 1 j 1::ii' :;1 ,:ii 111`111 1i J ii i
1. . . ./ ;• .1 ,.11 . 1 .1 1 1; 1. 1/1
44. .4444 It, ! •,i41 4, 1 . I! i, il:•i;i•'•' it:I?i!It li;:if . 4 I!}!' i1 III, ii?i!.!Is 1•, I1• 111 1 111, ;i :t :, 1 ;1 ; 11 i
r, ..
111 I : i I. . I 1 11 :ilk.1 .tit111i1 1j1, I.lI11. ,:!IIlilli;i
1:,. .. . . .., .i,. .1 i1/ lir,.1(11•IIt ' ; il •.: : 1•.
1 1. .11 I;Iti
I, .. . 1 1 .1 1.11 .. i4 . 1i I it •:1
411
1. . .
i.•
l. l 11.•ii (I i
f•
1.
t13•IiilI s5 • . i1Il! 111itl ,
r ,
1 l;( ;
1 .1i 111 in t
1l• t)
l : . S
ii,1 , 1;111 1' . i I iI i
Till ,. tiilli, 1,: : It 1 ( I .,;il i.l11I111 '
1 11 i1 .. 1
f
ll
i ' I. :i;Ilir :i . l i; ;Ii '' h ti , •. ; i f
I !1 1}'ill I Il l .1, II
1I111,i :i, ,. ,
1 ! ;II, {! . 1 1 }i I
1 1 I ( L
i• i11 i 'i i ,1 ( ' ! (, 1 i ;I(!i . ' !l Iiii 1 1( 1!11 / ', 1I+i Ill •i .
i I ' . 1 Iiiti, — eA ss:::::r„:lf,f r!1 fffgr f„11ft s:::::::::::,!::m:i :i!, I:11 i r . ' tlt i 1Ars.y/1 OUtfl1/lfret...47ffftl11 f*111 .MS.Mt•M111 , . : • 1 1 I I
1. 1 • •; i III Rt eo s MUM l ltf MT WE n 7f 1>•Af,M/f‘MSS m PM
1 . •(':I . ' I , i , ' • !1wN ws1ww w w+1 1 M+nsIs • s se„w
ji : jst !: 4jijtjIIi 1111r i! } I ( i1
1 '
Hi' ,
1 tIli Ii 1 ( ! !I ! 1
I't : 1 11 11: 1. ,1 ,II; : I• '
1
i i I I+
1 1 3 ,•1
1 1 {1. 4: } ' 1 ! 1; r! 1 .
ill i iot
1 ' I, '
rill: :1i 11 .i 1 1 i 1131 1
11 .;I1 .1 : ,
I 1 1 '• I111 1il it I ` i i !i(i 1 ;I 1
1:Ia'I ; ' . {,
i
i' 1111 1;1(; }i 1 1 i 1 ! '!
1 11 • I
1111il1 ' i "1I : ;,;i!iif I , ' !i 1 I (i 1I iI•` 1i i 1 1 ?
1 . . 1. . ••11ii ill i _ ,N •
I '1 i is 1 ( _
04'4
ssM:-Ii; + .
1 :J: '; • :01;i l d
I..,...7.144,4;
1:." . *FORM::+'`` I i I iI t i 1 '
f 1 Il•1^~ t ft.
r
L 4/1..—.
ji1eI 1 ,1 ! ' I ! I 1l I! 111 ri rNili:i' i ,'11 ' 11i11 r
i i! ' ti
1
y
11! 1 , rlr ; ii 11 .,1 1 1 '#):
f I •
ii111 ''t1 i, , ,( 1I 1: 1Ii11) ; ±. , t
r 1'
I (3: . .,'t ff. 1. il11l11 ,, 1ii'!i .I f 1 r11 .•I f i 1
I . : f1 , • 'I ''1; i . '( i; ; •I f 1
II It i11 : 1j !„ ; :Mll :
I i1 III'11 •
11
y
1 1 ,
1 : 1j; 'Ii!il I• 1 11 i i1
j11'i• :i : : Mil, . I I II it 1I 1 !I"', 1 i ii
r.
I' r
i
1 1i1 1ii II 1j, Gill 1 7
I
i 1 • II ii i
1". I11.1.
1 1• ,!
1'rtl' i '11
11, . i i1 • ' 1 li( 11 1.
4..%
1:%
111j•1•••
j• ;
f 1
ii i ,
I.i1 { + I1I. t ,
11:1 I i1
1 1 Ii 1 ! 1 I
I ( : 1 I
11
p
i'''' . 111 1ji: : tii I . •! !1 '1i1 1
ie.1 It
V.7;;i :i l
1.
1 !i: : 1 1 1 •
t,l l
11
iil il,1 :: iii; iiil;
1 i,itt;!III;
4.,::1 : • : 1 I I : : i I II., . ..11, 1 1
if
4 I
c , 1
r
i 11'(i t, I
I ,
Ip..1;:: A. :i111:1:11. ! 1';It 1t1 1 111..... !} .11 li,I i
Ili! . ; I .li iiiiwi 11i .4. it II
r 1
1 .,•••.t I 1{ . : ;: . .1 1 y. 1'' ,
iliiill,
i..hfi•- Yj.1
y• t+y• 'i•y'.;.«r•1•/ •r.. r rt •« ,•1•r •v '
1!
1ii1;,`:i ll1;: . ; I; 1j 1 • I 11i4144r, 11r ..1.1111rr:I r1;11 . ,. 1!•{.,ri,Li,,t{•. . . , 1 I 1-
i .' 1 .1: . 1.'' i , 1' 11,1 1. 1 } M f1S••••M AS M / r 00 M . ! ( !
11 i1!. .. . _ 1: . 1, f 1 1 :
1:. 1 fai i i;fi l t>Ai 1tI ItitM9l i IN l;N iW W t i1i"'rrtllY Nl •. !,+ "'
r.7ram .,: .., ; i 1r-i{I .
l w w MwM1wM..• •; •,' :
1. 1 .: '., 3''Ii '. 11 .t.l1.' '111.1 i" !: 11 .. 11141 „ .1 t 1111 11 I'yy l '1' ! 1. . , 1 .I.fit'/ *wa, . . ,. 1 1
1;,
t ;I i '
to. 1 . yy , . , .1 „ I
v
1 . .. . . . ;, .: . . . .
1 1 1.• 1. . tl : 11`:""441::. f111i {
I ,
1; ' ! . , i ! i , 1 1 .
1:Ir. . :: .1111• . .,. • 11. 'iJ 11111I i :1 : il:rl'`` i1: 1 ,1(1', 111 ,11i: y `'9 . , : • 1 : '
t•.ta4• •nyw.A
r i
i it
C.-L." 1 EXIST VH NE su oR-r$ k Ss- o3/y'' -L.
t: 5 q_-I '
4 i
1 (T VP)
f
r ..
f
l j r p) .
it
I; ••••-• • 1
It
1
t.
EXIST. RE/NF. STIFFEA/L_?S l ;-•
NEW F. CS. 3/
p"
a. '
Z RCINF
5TiFFENC s
ELLVAT ON s
r SGAL.E / " ` If-o''
fl
4 }
K t.
1
r F a
f
1)- tgia it
i'
4i' ) '''$‘.k‘— '—' D E TA i L fili i ,
f.
v
I ;. - - DETAIL.TA 1 Ls
i tip'T
1®
i '
1 i
NEW Re. %
a
At Z'i,," REIN
3TriFFENEi;s .( ( I EA ,,
131./\ 5T ,ENC_E' SE
4. ty
q• tr -
i 7 It
A`'
1.
j • Ex+s T ASPHALT I 0 /
ft, ',..././'74,/,4 r. I
1.
EXIST: CONC Fo0+INf,
TYP-'1 Gam-- 39 8 VA,p.4 E. t. ST CE- S :-t- A
T Y l L A 1 VA v3 1-.S"' E N G.t+ CT 1 C .)
V
SCALE %"_ J -C
a REVISION BY APPROVED DATE SYtl REVISED
AFFIDAVIT
LEE T. HEDIN
being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief .
Subscribed and sworn before me
this 19th day of February 1982 ,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at Auburn
Name of Notary Public) Hannah F. Kimball Signature of Owner)
L. T. Hedin, Operations Manager
Agent for Owner)
1412 F. St. .L. , Auburn, Washington 98002 Boeing Commercial Airplane Co.Address) Address)
Comm ssicn Expires May 20, 1984) P. 0. Box 3707, Mailstop 62-15
Seattle, Washington 98124
City) State)
237-9982
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by meandhasbeenfoundtobethoroughandcompJ*;ote in every particular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of such application .
Date Received 11; G R NTON , 9 By :
FEB 1 91982
Renton Planning Dept .
2-7 3
BU:LGING/ZONING DEPT.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY OF RINTON
1-1-11R :00W1E1)FEB 191982
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
8l"LDING/ZON:NC DErrfi'.
Application No. it-P/3-: S/!797-c`
Environmental Checklist No.1 ecTA
PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date:
0 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance
ElDeclaration of Non-Significance a Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS :
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1 . Name of Proponent Boeing Commercial Airplane Company
2. Address and phone number of Proponent :
P. 0. Box 3707, Mailstop 62-15
Seattle, Washington 98124
237-9982
3. Date Checklist submitted February 19, 1982
4. Agency requiring Checklist Building & Planning Departments
5. Name of proposal , if applicable :
Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position.
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
Install 300 L.F. additional blast fence (11 ' high) at existing test
position and extend existing air and electrical utilities.
2-
lJ
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal ) :
Apron "A" , east side of Renton Municipal Airport, adjacent to S. Cedar
River Bridge.
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
May 1, 1982
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local --including rezones) :
Building & Electrical Permit
Shoreline Development Permit
City of Renton Site Approval
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain :
No
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal ? If yes , explain :
No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
Building & Electrical Permits - to be submitted March, 1982
Shoreline Development Permit - submitted 2/19/82
City of Renton Site Approval - submitted 2/19/82 (See Attachments)
II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in :
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures? X
YE- MAYBE NO
b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
X
features?
YES MAYBE NO
d) The destruction , covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features? X
YES MAYBE N-
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay , inlet or lake? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
Extension of existing electrical conduit.
3-
2) Air. Will the proposal result in :
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
X
YES FiTYTT NO
b) The creation of objectionable odors?
X
YES MAYBE TT—
c) Alteration of air movement , moisture or temperature ,
or any change in climate, either locally or
regionally? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation :
3) Water. Will the proposal result in :
a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or
Xtherateandamountofsurfacewaterrunoff?
YES MBE NO
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body? X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
YB KATET WO—
W Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?X
YES MAYBE NO
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria,
X
or other substances into the ground waters?
YES MMAYBE NO
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies? X
YB MAYBE ifiT
Explanation:
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops ,
microflora and aquatic plants)? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area , or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
species? X
YES MAYBE P1B
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X
Yam— MAYBE NO
Explanation:
4-
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)? X
Yam— MAYBE N0
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area ,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
X
of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
X
glare?
yam— MAYBE tom'
Explanation:
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area? X
YES T B WU—
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X
YES MBE NO
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X
1 - MAYBE 0—
Explanation:
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area?
X
t MAYBE AU—
Explanation:
5-
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand
for new parking? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?X
vm MAYBE iF
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
X
YES M YBE NO
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X
YES— MAYBE NO
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
a) Fire protection? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Police protection?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Schools? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Parks or other recreational facilities?X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services?
X
YES FTTIT NO
Explanation:
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
X
YES MAYBE NB
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
Xthedevelopmentofnewsourcesofenergy?
YES— MAYBE Kb-
Explanation:
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities :
a) Power or natural gas? X
VET— FAMT NO
b) Communications systems? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Water?
X
YES MAYBE NO
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks? X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Storm water drainage? X
ira- WET WO—
W Solid waste and disposal? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? X
V- MAYBE 0—
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X
YES M AlB NO
Explanation:
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building? X
YES MAYBE WU—
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent: l ] 'j - loL Zi/8/i
si ne
Lee T. Hedin
name printed)
Operations Manager
BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE COMPANY P.O. Box 3707
Seattle, Washington 98124
A Division of The Boeing Company
February 19, 1982
R-6180-1765
CITY OF RENTON
City of Renton, Planning Dept.D
200 Mill Avenue South FEB 1 91982Renton, Washington 98055
Attention: Roger Blaylock CU""ING!ZON, G DE PT.
Reference: Boeing Commercial Airplane Co.
Proposal to Modify Apron "A"
Engine Test Position A-9.
Subject: Environmental Checklist, Substantial
Development Permit and Site Approval Applications.
Dear Mr. Blaylock:
Transmitted herewith are the subject applications for approval
of Boeing's proposal to Modify Apron "A" Engine Test Position A-9,
as follows:
9) ea. Environmental Checklist Form
6) ea. Application for Site Approval (with attachments:
Vicinity Map, Site Plan, Elevation & Section Details)
4) ea. Substantial Development Permit Application (with
attachments: Site Plan, Vicinity Map, Elevation &
Section Details, Affidavit of Ownership, Drawing
105-A-1016(S-1) Blast Fence Modifications, Renton
Field Apron "A" Layout) .
1) BCAC Check No. 141716 in the amount of $319.00 for
filing fees.
Publication dates of the Shoreline Management Notice of Application are
February 18 and 25, in the Daily Record Chronicle. The newspaper has been
instructed, per your request, to send the notices of publication directly to the
Planning Department.
As you know, from our previous conversations, this project is critical to the
757 delivery schedule. Our completion date is May 1, 1982. We deeply appreciate
your department's commitment to expedite these applications in order to help us
meet the required completion date. Please keep us advised of permit progress.
If there is anything else we can do to assist you in the process, contact us
immediately.
Ve truly Y°M/0407Aft
Hannah F. Kimball
L55)7O1.Q Engineering Services
237-1013
Receipt #
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
NAME DATE
PROJECT & LOCATION
Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total
Environmental Checklist Acro
Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee
TOTAL FEES I i
Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor.
Thank vou.
7MDING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
OI 8