Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA82-035rya gr, aoaq,+n * m f'+'1" '- +! MK 1 II P --I l M• -.w 0 P'WE LL m/s e w i 111 Tt4'n A 5 av w V 1 1 Shy MON p 1 rl A.\/ S W 111 CSNC A NE GW 1-- 1411k SENt?C.A. Y AvF W l --11 __\,, 1 A \ LNt7 lave ,-,W i\. MAPLE av sin/ 1 P21D 1 AVE S.N I f, 1 J Vct. YI r BEii1iJINâ OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED OF R4A v 6 © ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR dLZ o alms 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 06)4, SEPS -. P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR May 17, 1982 Clint Spaulding 507 2nd Avenue West Seattle, Washington 98119 Dear Mr. Spaulding: In reviewing your file for Site Approval (SA-035-82) at 303 S.W. 10th Street, it has been determined that no land use application or public hearing is required. Therefore, your application is dismissed and your fees will be refunded. Contact this office for details. Very truly yours, 71?Ge--01-degi Steve Munson Assistant Planner SM:cl r FINAL DECLARATION OFNON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : SA-035-82 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-039-82 Description of Proposal : Site approval application for a two-story office building. Proponent : Earlington Park Limited Partnership Location of Proposal:Property located at 303 S.W. 10th Street, between S.W. Grady Way & S.W. 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue. Lead Agency: Building & Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on May 5, 1982, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Donald Persson, Ronald Nelson, Robert Bergstrom, Richard Houghton, Jerry Lind, James Matthew and Roger Blaylock. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-039-82 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: William L. Harris DATED: April 21 , 1982. 2) Applications : SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82) 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building & Zoning Department, Policy Development Department, Fire Department, Police Department, Utility Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Design Engineering Division. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development has a non-significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely impact adjacent properties and that the following condition shall be complied with: storm drainage is to be underground. Signatures : z h.e l7, a«,n- -ter Rr a 1 r1 a Mal enn n .., D Date circulated : April 27 , 1982 Comments due : 4 , 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 039 - 82 APPLICATION No(s) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82) PROPONENT : Williams L. Harris - Elling Halvorson, Inc. for Johnson-Lieber Co. , Inc. (EARLINGTON PARK LIMiTl tt 771rNEIr HTP7- PROJECT TITLE : JOHNSON-LIEBER BUILDING Brief Description of Project : Site Approvel application for a two-story office building. Property located at 303 S.W. 10th St. , between S.W. Grady LOCATION : Way & S.W. 10th St. with the cross street being Thomas Ave. SITE AREA : 50, 472 . 31 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) 18, 627 sq. ft. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :X 3 ) Water & water courses : X 4 ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life : X 6 ) Noise : X 7 ) Light & glare : X 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : Minimal View obstruction : Minor T 9 ) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings : X 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 360 ADT traffic impacts : 10th & Lind 14 ) Public services :X 15 ) Energy : X 16 ) Utilities : X 17 ) Human health : X 18 ) Aesthetics : X 19 ) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/history : X COMMENTS : RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-039-82 Application: SITE APPR0VAL1S3-035-82) Site approval application for a two-story office building. (Johnson-Lieber Building) Location: Property located at 303 S .W. 10th_ Street, between S .W. Grady Way b S .W. 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue S .W. Applicant: Earlington Park Limited Partnership IQ;D1. Public Works Department Sa Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 5-5-82 Wraffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Q Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department U Building Department Police Department 0 Others: Policy Development Dept. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved 0Approved with Conditions [] Not Approved 3,, sf DATE: H' gnature of Direc r or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :__ 14, El, D Approved Q Approved with Conditions EjNot Approved tea ii / IJIV11 J/ IJOJ RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-039-82 Application: SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82) Site approval application for a two-story office building. (Johnson-Lieber Building) Location: Property located at 303 S .W. 10th_Street, between S .W. Grady Way b S .W. 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue S .W. Applicant: Earlington Park Limited Partnership IQ: Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 5-5-82 O Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 0 Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department 0 Parks Department Building Department 0 Police Department Others: Policy Development Dept. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. C REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved zt Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved 10 ,,(.e eef-/ ef A S.e a# Z,1 d1 ,a'Id Cli 5/4, . DATE: 0 ,e2, Cigna ur of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 0 Approved []Approved with Conditions Not Approved RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-039-82 Application: SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82) Site approval application for a two-story office building_. (Johnson-Lieber Building) Location: Property located at 303 S.W. 10th. Street , between S .W. Grady Way & S .W. 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue S .W. Applicant: Earlington Park Limited Partnership IQ;Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 5-5-82 Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Department Q Building Department Police Department Others: Policy Development Dept. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED INWRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMEN':/DIVISION Approved 0 Approved with Conditions [] Not Approved t'/4S7- /'tt 7 t71 - p'u';e6c G- 7/ s - DATE: 2-7/ez6/63SignaturofDirectororAuthorizdRepresentative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 47uC.-I [` Approved B' pproved with Conditions Not Approved n OT!IiTY APPROVAL SUORECi T-T LATE COMERS AGREEME2.1 WATER YE LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER SYSTEM Ct Z dMENT CHARGE • WATER c'rW^ was wirt cw RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-039-82 Application: SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82) Site approval application for a two-story office building. (Johnson-Lieber Building) Location: Property located at 303 S.W. loth Street, between S .W. Grady Way 8, S .W. 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue S .W. Applicant: Earlington Park Limited Partnership IQ: Public Works Department Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 5-5-82 0 Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:OUtilities Eng. Division Fire Department Darks Department 0Building Department Police Department UOthers: Policy Development Dept. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED INWRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved DATE: ignat of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved D Approved with Conditions EINot Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-039-82 Application: SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82) Site approval application for a two-story office building. (Johnson-Lieber Building) Location: Property located at 303 S .W. 10th_ Street, between S.W. Grady Way IS S.W. 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue S.W. Applicant: Earlington Park Limited Partnership IQ:OPublic Works Department DEngineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 5-5-82 Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: Utilities Eng. Division Fire Department Parks Depa rtmen t Building Department isrp Department Others. Policy Development Dept. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED INWRITING. PLIASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:POLICE DApproved appproved with Conditions Not Approved 1) All street improvements to Grady Way 2) Lighting on site be placed on the edges so it shines inward to avoid light glare onto street & does not blind police officers checking the building at night. Lt. D. .R Persson DATE: 5/5/R2. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved 0 Approved with Conditions EiNot Approved DATE: Signature of Director or Authorized Rep_resentative Date circulated : April 27, 1982 Comments due : May 4, 1982 ENVIRONIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 039 - 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82) PROPONENT : William L. Harris - Elling Halvorson, Inc. for Johnson-Lieber Co. , Inc. EARLINGTON PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) PROJECT TITLE : Johnson-Lieber Building Brief Description of Project : Site approval application for a two-story office building. LOCATION : Property located at 303 SW 10th Street, between SW Grady Way & SW 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue. SITE AREA : 50. 472.31 So. Ft. BUILDING AREA (gross ) 18,627 Sq. Ft. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :c/ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : c-- 7 ) Light & glare : L- 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 1/ 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : f 12 ) Number of Dwellings : t 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 7-AO T; traffic impacts : Miv, t. 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : c-- - 16 ) Utilities : L- 17 ) Human health : 1 _ 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information e _ C r Reviewed by : (c12- . ›- V ia7a--, Title : -/ ,(•) //'e Date : i/( FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : April 27, 1982 Comments due : May 4, 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 039 - 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82) PROPONENT : William L. Harris - Elling Halvorson, Inc. for Johnson-Lieber Co. , Inc. EARLINGTON PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) PROJECT TITLE : Johnson-Lieber Building Brief Description of Project : Site approval application for a two-story office building. LOCATION : Property located at 303 SW 10th Street, between SW Grady Way & SW 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue. SITE AREA : 50. 472.31 Sa. Ft. BUILDING AREA (gross ) 18,627 Sq. Ft. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : v' 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : r 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : c/. COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : C72Z-7"- r Title : Date : kz-- I FORM: ERC-06 Date circulatec. . --pril 27, 1982 Comments due : May 4, 1982 ENVIRONMEPTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 039 - 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82) PROPONENT : William L. Harris - Elling Halvorson, Inc. for Johnson-Lieber Co. , Inc. EARLINGTON PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) PROJECT TITLE : Johnson-Lieber Building Brief Description of Project : Site approval application for a two-story office building. LOCATION : Property located at 303 SW 10th Street, between SW Grady Way & SW 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue. SITE AREA : 50. 472.31 Sa. Ft. BUILDING AREA (gross ) 18,627 Sq. Ft. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (s) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : f X 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : C 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : et/ //l( / View obstruction : f1i/ f / /t1' 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings : x G. 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 716(((i Z(9 0 4/)7 traffic impacts :L77d 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : X 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : C O M M E N T S5 c6,- 2 cv s,i,' d/I s4 z// k d46 Recommendation : D SI_ . DOS More Information Reviewed by . / it /y." diiy4z7,Title : liror Date :ft FORM: ERC-06 I1.17f1 c Date circulated : epril 27, 1982 Comments due : May 4, 1982 ENIVIROMIMEP TAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 039 - 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82) PROPONENT ; William L. Harris - Elling Halvorson, Inc. for Johnson-Lieber Co. , Inc. EARLINGTON PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) PROJECT TITLE : Johnson-Lieber Building Brief Description of Project : Site approval application for a two-story office building. LOCATION : Property located at 303 SW 10th Street, between SW Grady Way & SW 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue. SITE AREA : 50. 472..31 SG. Ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) 18,627 Sq. Ft. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : x 6 ) Noise : X 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : lye View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : NSI ,)( DOS More Information Reviewed by : Title : Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : Hpril 27, 1982 Comments due : May 4, 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 039 - 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82) PROPONENT : William L. Harris - Elling Halvorson, Inc. for Johnson-Lieber Co. , Inc. EARLINGTON PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) PROJECT TITLE : Johnson-Lieber Building Brief Description of Project : Site approval application for a two-story office building. LOCATION : Property located at 303 SW 10th Street, between SW Grady Way & SW 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue. SITE AREA : 50. 472.31 Sq. Ft. BUILDING AREA (gross ) 18,627 Sq. Ft. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : r 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : L./ 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : V 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : N I DOS More Information Reviewed by : Title : 1-inCttr Em& Date : Mkt/ 5) ;qgz FORM: ERC-06 Rent `,t I \ Date circulated : April 27, 1982 Comments due : F LJUgU ENVIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 039 - 82 APR, 2 8 1982APPLICATIONNo (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82) PROPONENT : William L. Harris - Elling Halvorson, Inc. for Johnson-Lieber Co. , Inc. EARLINGTON PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) PROJECT TITLE : Johnson-Lieber Building Brief Description of Project : Site approval application for a two-story office building. LOCATION : Property located at 303 SW 10th Street, between SW Grady Way & SW 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue. SITE AREA : 50. 472.31 So. Ft. BUILDING AREA (gross ) 18,627 Sq. Ft. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses ; 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : V' 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : v// 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation :(—1 DOS More Information Reviewed by : dL-, — Title : --rj,e/5- i Date : 2n/ '2 FORM: ERC-06 rci,106 Date circulated ; hpril 27, 1982 Comments due : May 4, 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF — 039 — 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82) PROPONENT : William L. Harris - Elling Halvorson, Inc. for Johnson-Lieber Co. , Inc. EARLINGTON PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) PROJECT TITLE : Johnson-Lieber Building Brief Description of Project : Site approval application for a two-story office building. LOCATION : Property located at 303 SW 10th Street, between SW Grady Way & SW 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue. SITE AREA : 50. 472.31 Sa. Ft. BUILDING AREA (gross ) 18,627 Sq. Ft. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : r 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : xxxx 14 ) Public services : xxxx 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information xxxx Reviewed by : Lt. D.R. persson Title : Date : 5/5/82 FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : April 27, 1982 Comments due : May 4, 1982 ENVIRONMEINTAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 039 - 82 APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82) PROPONENT : William L. Harris - Elling Halvorson, Inc. for Johnson-Lieber Co. , Inc. EARLINGTON PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) PROJECT TITLE : Johnson-Lieber Building Brief Description of Project : Site approval application for a two-story office building. LOCATION : Property located at 303 SW 10th Street, between SW Grady Way & SW 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue. SITE AREA : 50, 472.31 Sa. Ft. BUILDING AREA (gross ) 18,627 Sq. Ft. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : Title : Date : FORM: ERC-06 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following j. project: EARLINGTON PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Site approval application for a two-story office building, file SA-035-82; property located at 303 S.W. 10th Street , between S.W. Grady Way and S.W. 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue S.W. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by May 24, 1982. Published: May 10, 1982 I'. 1/10 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEf= COMMITTEE MAY 5, 1982 AGE R DA COMMENCING AT 10 : 00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM OLD BUSINESS ECF-114-81 WILGEO COMPANY B-268 One story shopping center (Village Square Shopping Center) ; located on the north side of Bronson Way N. and Garden Avenue North. ECF-095-81 LAKE TERRACE PARK ASSOCIATES R-090-81 Application for rezone from "T" to R-3, maximum of 15 units per acre, to allow future development of condominiums or adult apartments; property located in the vicinity of 21 Lake Washington Blvd. North. NEW BUSINESS ECF-039-82 EARLINGTON PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SA-035-82 Site approval application for a two-story office building; property located at 303 S.W. 10th Street, between S.W. Grady Way and S.W. 10th Street with the cross street being Thomas Avenue S.W. ENVIRONMENTAL REV IE IITTEE` AGENDA II,T PAGE TWO I1 •1.0 I g i - - c I AM 4 A 11111t4, 1 4,.... 11'3eiiik 1.1'' 4:1,_A1..,[. ii 1 1 itt . ea k ,---/ ---- IOC ' ar, 1 r LAKE TERRACE PARK ASSOCIA T-.ETS s.- W LAKE III /Ma-\ v- ' + 7...\_ 1.4" ASHINGTON 4 '. r iris•._.,: p( 4t1ils_- 1\21. N.,.mar I e, • - AIWR , ii. Est \\ k i, ..,...._ 7 1 F ' „Crarime.41 - - - - 11-74T M.101 III Inelp,12 vjaUlikollig' tirj i I 1 1 ,Leiiur - i 4114, tt (6"-( ), z4.....A.,..e ityh 4 q ' WILGEO COMPANYii.... i ,, I, L e.-- \ .. , .....;„-..-_,, ..1IL ?\ angazir ma onsi -a•idk i.------; Jj' i ø-!?i i i. 6.. ' lei I 1111''EARLINGTON PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1I \ 104 Am ih _ L., 1. I i wirtt,____An. I7 --I,H4VA-frilliiiiiiii. 1', .\--\) ,' 1 I- . 111E1174- .! LI Eirmil"Wiliblirm , .* . " ' ' • - - -- - i i'grilliikvir 1,7 r 1 Ili -, = 1 f i 1 UPI' I u .. 1 - - - -- killN1'; Mt i : I '. CN r d l ME I d SAKE i• rou»c3 II I CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION SITE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE USE ONLY oo a File No . SA- U,'.Fd` Filing Date o`/ (?,9- Application Fee $ Receipt No. 4 Environmental Review Fee $ / ., e& APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : 1 . Name at2LIMIATorl T'At&. LlMITrt7 rA2t-NEe6144P Phone 286 - C`f 10 Address 2N12 AVE WW . SEAIf.E 19 2 . Property location j03 51N tOTI4 Sr. 2EMTON CIA-, 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) sc-E A rAcc4 Eo s4 4. Number of acressquareor feet S 472 .31 `•P'. Present zoning L- Isog 5 . What do 'you propose to develop on this property? tk Ntil4o l - L(EF5EtZ. IN ILDI Wit mir) sTo2Y sTZCzTrI W rn-I 4 Tons-C- of IS, 627 GO.J r. 6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application : A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale existing structures , easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200 ' to 800 ' D. Building height and area (existing and proposed) 7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION : Date Approved Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept. Rev, 1-77 I; viJ L' T SAFECOTITLE !NSUBANCF COMPANY TCLEPHONF 1_'Ufil 3!)7 1S!,Q FOURTH & V:NE BUILOING MAILING AUDIIFSS P.O. BOX ?1087 SEATTLE•WA);1IINGTGN SFAT TLC•WA 98111 Lot 2 That portion of Burlington Northern, Tnc. 's former right-of- way and of Puget Sound Power & Light Co. 's right-of-way in the West half of the Northwest quarter of Section 19, Township 23N, Range 5E, W.M. , in King County, Wa. described as follows:. Commencing at the intersection of the West line of Lind Ave. , being 40 feet West, measured at right angles, from the centerline thereof, and the Northerly line of said Burlington Northern right-of-way, which intersection is approximately 220 feet Northerly, measured at right angles, from the centerline of Grady Way; thence South 77°-26'-30" West along said northerly line 717.73 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing South ,77°-26'-30" West 269. 53 feet to a point North 77 26' -30" East 17. 64 feet from the West line of said Section 19; thence South 12°-33'-30" East 170.21 feet to the northerly line of ' S.W. Grady Way; thence North 77°-26'-30" East along said line 296.53 feet to a point which is South 12°-33'-30" East from the true point of beginning; thence North 12°-33'-30" West 170. 21 feet to the true point of beginning. e) 101 ITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON PP ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. Environmental Checklist No. 2-.`i-C-/-7.---e37-51. PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance ElDeclaration of Non-Significance O Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: 611 Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review witn- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completea , even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1 . ,Name of Proponent William L. Harris - Riling Halvorson. Inc. for ohnson-LLieber Co. , Inc. 2. Address and phone number of vroponent: 2703 152nd Ave N.E. Redmond, Washington 98052 885-3433 3. Date Checklist submitted April 21, 1982 4. Agency requiring Checklist Building and Zoning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Johnson-Lieber Building 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Two-story office building comprised of 18,600 sq. ft. and a corresponding 93 parking stalls. The building is predominatly wood frame with some masonry. Elements of the exterior include an enameled metal mansard roof, glass and wood siding. 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The property is located between S.W. Grady Way & S.W. 10th St. with the cross street being Thomas. There are 50,472.31 sc. ft. in the property. The site has been cleared and there are scrub brushes and weeds. There is an open drainage ditch on the southern portion as well as some power lines. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : September — October, 1982 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : State flood control zone permit Building Permit 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain : No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: State Flood Control Zone Permit II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in : a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ..g-round surface relief features? Tr— MAYBE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? x YES- RUBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? x YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? x YES MBE NO Explanation: There will be a small amount of excavation and grading to set the building, form the parking areas and to establish planting areas. 4- 5) Fauna. Mill the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: New landscaped areas may provide a habitat to fauna indigenous to the area. 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation : During construction, there will be an inrrPacP in nniGP levels, but this will be temporary. 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare?YES M YBE N7 Explanation: Security lighting of the building_ winanum Nay create some glare, but this should be minimal. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the8) La nd PndUse. P x present or planned land use of an area?YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Occupants of the building will use a normal amount of electricity and water in the course of their daily activities. 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to , oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? TFT RTTTE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? x Yam- RATTE NO Explanation: Occupants of the building may commute from areas other than Renton. 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? x YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? x YES FATTT NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature , or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: During the course of construction exhaust will be emitted through the operation of machinery and equipment. 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? x YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? x YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? x YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate , phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? x YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The roof drainage and parking area drainage will alter the pattern that exists on the vacant lot, but this will be handled with a storm system. Occupants of the building will use a normal amount of public water. 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? yr MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or endangered species of flora?rs MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? x YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? x YES MBE NO Explanation: Landscaped areas will add numbers and diversity of Cppe flora to an otherwise barren site. 5- 12) Housing.. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? x YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? x YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? x YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? x YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? x YES MAYBE NC f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: This building requires 93 parking stalls. Occupants cars will affect traffic density on S.W. 10th St. , but this should be minimual. Some occupants of the building may use public transportation. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? x YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? x YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities?x YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? x YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAYbE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? x YES M YBE NO Explanation: 16) Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? x YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? x YES MAYBE NO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal ? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? x YES M YBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? x RITEBE NO Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it'might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full dis losu e on my part. LiProponent: G/ r 7 Cfj441 signed) William L. Harris name printed) AFFIDAVIT c,QKLIN yraJ '0mee ziknyriw4MTAAvii3Obeing duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this21 st day ofAp ri I 19 82 • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Bothell EARLINGTON PARK, Limited Partnershil B 1; Name 'of Notary Public) Y ( Signature of Comer) 1 16415 Balder Lane, Bothell, WA 98011 5/7 o9 b !ii/ /ut- I Address)Address) 6.4¢-77Z6 W14 City) State) d e6) a es--o 9 fO . Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Building & Zoning Depart- ment governing the filing of such application. Date Received 19 By: Renton Building & Zoning Department 3-82 ceipt # CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME DATE PROJECT & LOCATION J.A ' t , tp nit. i.4r) r3.^virtu"),' I Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total Environmental Checklist "2-'/ `'..r----':" Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank vou. T ii OF FILE FILE TITLE te