HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA82-066BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITLE MICROFILMEU
ovaA
O668
G S
Z.),
ii
lik
ii
O N
i
1
41 I 4
i
4litiltillb. -
Ns\
s
0
131
0
0. GB 4
x
t \.\.
1r• t
i
lei
G8''3
CITY
RECEIVED 2o
j
HEAROG EXFgENjyEONis...................„„ %ftls NDV 21982
75.17 AM
PM
w
71819110,11,12i 1;213 41516 i 10
1010
jxj4H3Trr NO. L ;
it "
s• ii 'EM NO.1 1 1
Ishie0iMP
IIIWg s
4
191D
r00 :nff !.0
Al 71(
p
Housing Authority of the City of Renton 206) 226-1850
P.O. BOX 2316 • RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055
November 2, 1982
Building & Zoning Department
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue
Renton, WA 98055
To Whom It May Concern:
The Housing Authority of the City of Renton has developed a 28-unit low-rent
housing project, Cole Manor, on Lots number 1, 2 and 3 of Tino Cugini's Short
Plat #2. The units are nearing completion without access for ingress and egress
to N.E. Third Street except for emergency vehicles, according to conditions as
set forth by the Hearing Examiner and the Fire Marshall.
We understand that a development on Lot number 4 of Cugini's Short Plat #2 is
being proposed. The Site Plans allow two entrances for ingress and egress onto
N.E. Third Street, a four-lane highway.
The development would contain four 10,000 gallon tanks under concrete pads on
space abutting Cole Manor, and an 80' x 40' building to be used, we understand,
as a car repair shop. The Site Plans show the building within five (5) feet of
the property line between Cole Manor and the new development.
We also note that future development is shown on a portion of Lot #4. What would
be contemplated there? Would such future development cause our family units to
diminish in property and aesthetic value? Does anyone know what type of develop-
ment would be located there? Couldn't the building be placed on the easterly line
of the property?
I
I!
Regarding the Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner: Under 'M' , Departmental
Recommendations, the Housing Authority approves 1 through 5, if the site approval
is granted.
We do not wish to stop progress but we also feel these questions should be asked
and approval be given only as recommended in the Departmental Recommendations as
herein referred to.
Very truly yours,
RECEIVED
Floyd W. Shaff, Chairman of the Board of Commissioners CITY OF RENTON
Housing Authority of the City of Renton HEARING EXAMINES
21982AM
PM
FS/js
7' '9'!!I'fl I2 l I2,3 4i5 6
g
W. DUVET
November 2 , 1982
Hearing Examiner
City of Renton
Municipal Building
200 Mill Ave . , So .
Renton, WA 98055
Attention: Mr . Kaufman
Dear Mr . Kaufman ,
In regard to SA-066-82 , Mt . Olivet Cemetery agrees with the
final declaration, which requires storm water retention systems
designated to recharge the natural aquifer .
If this requirement to recharge the aquifer is applied as
a condition of the permit and enforced by the City of Renton,
Mt . Olivet Cemetery has no other concerns with regard to this
project .
In the past , as you are aware, there have been problems
with regard to other permits purportedly protecting the
Cemetery ' s water rights ; I trust that sufficient language can
be added to the Hearing Examiner ' s report to assure that all
natural ecipitation be utilized in the recharging of the
ground ater .
i c re
a es L . Colt
President
Mt . Olivet Cemetery Co . , Inc .RECM. oFE/VEOsa
RMG ExEFT MNTON
JLC : dkc AM NOV 21982ER
718191
UI1'12 1jr2,,
4 3 4 5,6
Cemetery, Mausoleum, Crematory & Gardens
Box 547 • 100 Blaine Ave. N.E., Renton, WA. 98057 • 206-255-0323
41111140111
OF411
o Co
THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
9° co.
FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235 -2593
094T SEPSE
O
P
December 6, 1982
Mr. Louis Peretti
115 Monterey Place N.E.
Renton, WA 98056
RE: File No. SA-066-82, Louis Peretti; Request for Site Plan Approval
Dear Mr. Peretti:
The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was
published on November 16, 1982, has not been appealed within the 14-day
period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered
final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing.
Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or infor-
mation is required.
Sincerely,
q7.411
Fred J. Ka man
Hearing Examiner
cc: City Clerk
Building & Zoning Department
r
e
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
Statc of Washington)
County of King
Willis V. Roberts being first duly sworn, upon oath
disposes and states:
That on the 16th dayof November 1982 affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing
a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the
parties of record in the below entitled application or petition.
Subscribed and sworn this / 7 day of b-treirr CeJui
Nota y Public in and for,c St to of
Washington, residing at /( L
li
Application, Petition or Case: Louis Peretti, SA-066-82
The minutes conta.i.n. a List o6 .the paAti.es necond. )
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND DECISION .
APPLICANT: Louis Peretti FILE NO. SA-066-82
LOCATION: North side of N.E. 3rd Street between Index Avenue N.E. and
Harrington Avenue N.E. (extended) .
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval for an auto service
building.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building & Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with
conditions
Hearing Examiner Decision: Not approved.
BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department report was received by the
DEPARTMENT REPORT: Examiner on October 26, 1982.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building & Zoning Department report ,
examining available information on file with the application,
and field checking the property and surrounding area, the
Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on November 2, 1982 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator, presented the Building & Zoning Department report,
and entered the following exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #1 : Application File including Building & Zoning
Department report and other pertinent documents
Exhibit #2: Site Plan as submitted
Exhibit #3: Site Plan with staff comments
Exhibit #4: Site Approval for Superstructures, File No.
SA-066-81 , adjoining property (by reference)
Exhibit #5: As-built drawings for Superstructures, received
May 5, 1982 by reference
Exhibit #6: As-built drawings for sidewalks located along
N.E. 3rd Street
Exhibit #7: Letter received November 2, 1982 from James
Colt, Mt. Olivet Cemetery, regarding retention
systems on site and recharge of aquifer
Mr. Blaylock noted that concerns and requests included in Exhibit #7 are already conditions
of approval of the Environmental Review Committee. Corrections to the staff report were
provided as follows: Section B.7. Existing Zoning, should include L-1 as well as B-1
denoted; Section B.9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designation is incorrectly denoted as
commercial and should be revised to medium density multifamily designation. Blaylock
advised that although the Comprehensive Plan designation is incompatible with proposed
development, the project conforms to uses allowed in existing zoning categories on site.
Multifamily development to the west and north of the property will require substantial
buffering from the subject commercial use, and recommendations for provision of landscaping
and a concrete fence were discussed.
Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding Phase II plans, Mr. Blaylock advised that
the second phase is yet to be determined; however it may be reserved for expansion of the
Phase I building area or redevelopment of the site for another use. Section L. 1 which
states that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation was corrected;
to denote inconsistency. Responding to the Examiner's request for clarification of the
proposed use, whether it be an auto repair shop, service station, gas station or all of
the uses, Mr. Blaylock advised that three service bays would be located in the facility
along with gas pumps, and sales and administrative offices. To buffer the site from
adjacent multifamily development, the proposed building would be faced away from existing
development and blocked by a 17-foot solid concrete block wall to deflect noise towards
the east.
SA-066-82 Page Two
Mr. Blaylock pointed out discrepancies on the applicant 's site plan submissions relating
to property lines and sidewalk locations, described setback requirements for abutting
residential and commercial properties, and reported the following modifications in the
departmental recommendation: eliminate Section M. 1 ; revise Section M.2 to read:
Construction of an eight (8) foot concrete fence along the western and northern property
lines to provide buffering between the two uses; addition of Section M.6 to require
screening of rooftop equipment.
The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was:
Louis Peretti
115 Monterey Place N.E.
Renton, WA 98056
Mr. Peretti indicated knowledge of the discrepancy between the property line and the
sidewalk. He advised concurrence in the staff recommendation for elimination of the
requirement for a 15-foot landscaped setback along the western and northern property
lines and requirement for a concrete fence along those boundaries since continuation of
the back wall of the building is desired. Addressing the staff recommendation for
redesign of the site to allow emergency vehicle access per code requirements, Mr. Peretti
stated that a thorough study of access to service stations has been accomplished by him
throughout the United States and the site plan as presented will allow efficient access.
Section M.5 requiring a 10-foot landscaped setback was felt to be excessive along N.E.
3rd Street. Referencing Section L.8 which requires a latecomers' fee for water, Mr .
Peretti outlined history of utility extensions and agreements, expression objection to
the latecomers' fee. The Examiner clarified that the issues of contention are not
within his jurisdiction because they had either been imposed by the Environmental Review
Committee or were required by code. Discussion indicated that although Mr. Peretti had
received the public hearing notice at his business address (other than that listed above) ,
he did not receive the report published by the Environmental Review Committee for his
project. Mr. Blaylock indicated that all correspondence and reports had been mailed
according to city records.
Further discussion revealed that although the service station is not currently proposed
to be a 24-hour operation, such a use may occur in the future; current plans for service
include tune ups, lubrications, replacement of brake linings; design of the building will
be "L" shaped and uses may not be limited to entirely automobile related uses; and three
vacant commercial parcels exist to the east of the site.
The Examiner requested testimony in opposition to the proposal . Responding was:
Floyd Shaff
Chairman of the Board
Renton Housing Authority
P.O. Box 2316
Renton, WA 98056
representing:
A. J. Ladner, Executive Director
same address)
Mr. Shaff reviewed history of the adjacent Housing Authority development containing 28
units of from one to three bedrooms. He indicated concern regarding location of a
service station within five feet from the property line of the Housing Authority
development, and questioned development of Lot 4 which is yet to be determined.
Reduction of aesthetic value of residential property was discussed and a suggestion
made to shift the proposed structure to the easterly boundary of the site.
Responding to the staff recommendation, Mr. Shaff indicated no objection to the conditions
as denoted and the five foot building setback would be acceptable if the solid concrete
fence were constructed along the western property line.
The Examiner inquired if there is any reason why the building could not be oriented
towards the east property line instead of the west property line. Mr. Peretti advised
that because traffic flow is generated from east to west, visual exposure of the building
is imperative to the business use and provides the rationale for location of the building.
Responding to the Examiner 's inquiry regarding impact to multiple family housing to the
west, Mr. Peretti felt that noise impacts would be predicated upon each individual 's
tolerance. However, he felt that the noise would be minimal .
The Examiner requested final comments. Mr. Blaylock indicated staff concern with
placement of the building on the east side of the site which would orient the building
towards the multifamily development instead of away from it. Since there were no further
comments, the hearing regarding File No. SA-066-82 was closed by the Examiner at 9:55 a.m.
SA-0L_ 32 Page Three
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the
Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The applicant, Louis Peretti , filed a request for approval of a site plan for gaso-
line service station.
2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Building
and Zoning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the
record as Exhibit #1.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, RCP 43.21C, as amended, a Declaration of Non-significance has
been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) ,
responsible official .
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. The subject property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between Index
Avenue N.E. and Harrington Avenue N. E. , as extended.
6. The subject property was annexed into the city in June of 1956 by Ordinance 1549.
In April of 1964, part of the subject site was reclassified to B-1 (business/
commercial ) by Ordinance 2085. The remainder of the site was classified to L-1
light industry) . The site was subdivided by Tino Cugini in August of 1979, and
site plan review was required of any proposed use of the subject site (Short Plat
384-79) .
7. The subject site is primarily classified B-1. A rather small triangle at the
extreme southwestern end of the property is classified L-1.
8. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as
suitable for the development of multi-family housing at medium densities.
9. North of the subject site' s B-1 district is an R-1 (single family residential ,
minimum lot size 7,200 square feet) district. West of the site is G-1 (general ,
single family residential , minimum lot size 35,000 square feet) district. Across
N. E. 3rd Street to the south is the remaining portion of the L-1 district, which
includes the small portion of the subject site.
10. Immediately west and north of the subject site is the recently authorized low income
housing complex. North of N. E. 4th Street is a single family subdivision. Most of
the properties south of the site south of N.E. 3rd Street are undeveloped. The sub-
ject site is also undeveloped.
11. The applicant proposes erecting a 3,200 square foot gasoline service station on the
approximately 38,000 square foot site. The proposal will also contain two pump
islands. Four (4) 10,000 gallon tanks containing gasoline will be buried beneath
the site.
12. The Housing Authority of the City of Renton raised a number of concerns regarding
the location of the proposal immediately adjacent to its housing complex. That
agency did not oppose the project directly but questioned the effects the project
would have on the property value and aesthetic value of the housing complex.
13. Site plan review was required because of the sensitive nature of the mixed zoning
of the original short plat and the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan, as
it applied to the subject site.
14. City staff originally recommended that the proposed gasoline station be moved 15
feet south and east to provide additional landscape buffering areas. The Police
Department and the Policy Development Department are concerned about the buffering
between the proposed use and the multi-family complex next door.
The proposal would have to be set back ten feet from N.E. 3rd Street (Section 4-716),
a major arterial street.
The Fire Department has indicated that the on-site maneuvering is not adequately
provided for in the site plans. The Fire Department would have final review and
approval authority over fire relating aspects of the site plan.
15. Mt. Olivet Cemetery requested that the conditions imposed by the ERC regarding storm
water recharge be enforced by the city in the development of this site. Those condi-
tions were imposed and no appeal filed therefrom, and they are, therefore,effective
for the subject site.
SA-066-82 Page Four
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant has failed to demonstrate why a gasoline service station should be
permitted to be located immediately adjacent to residential development.
The proposal not only violates the general goals and policies of the Comprehensive
Plan requiring segregation of incompatible uses but also violates the map element
designation of the site for multi-family uses. That designation led to the estab-
lishment of a well designed housing complex for low income residential on property
which abuts the proposed use on both the north and the west. The residential units
will be within 15 to 20 feet of a full service gasoline station with pumps, islands
and service bays. The housing complex was separately reviewed and approved by the
City Council , and that complex's residential amenities will be jeopardized by per-
mitting an intrusive gasoline station on the subject site.
The subject site actually wedges its way into the residential complex, as it intrudes
into the open end of the "L" shaped housing complex.
2. While the housing complex provides a landscape buffer, such buffer will not effec-
tively screen out the noise or odors of the service station. The proposed solid
concrete wall may screen out some of the noise and some of the light and glare,
but this is not certain.
3. The proposed use is incompatible with the quiet necessary for residential enjoyment.
The station could operate 24 hours per day. The fact that the housing is for low
income residential should not preclude the city from effectuating desirable land
use patterns.
All residents should have an equal opportunity to obtain sound housing." (Policy
4.A.2) While the complex was developed to cater to low income residents, they also
deserve the residential amenities implied in good land use planning.
Permitting the operation of a gasoline service station with four 10,000 gallon
gasoline storage tanks adjacent to a residential complex is detrimental to the
public health, safety and welfare.
4. The fact that other similar juxapositions may already exist in the city is not
reason to permit further inconsistent and incompatible arrangements of residential
and commercial development.
Incompatible uses should be gradually eliminated" (Policy 4.A.4) and not intro-
duced.
Commercial areas should be compatible with adjacent land uses. " (Policy 5.A.7)
The site can be utilized for other commercial development of a less intrusive
nature. Certainly, since the map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates
the area for multi-family residential uses, the applicant must make some effort
to employ the commercial zoning of the property in a fashion which is compatible
with the existing uses.
5. "Boundaries of districts should be buffered by uses compatible with each district. "
Policy 3.B.3) While the identity of this district is somewhat unclear, a gasoline
service station certainly does not provide development compatible with the multi-
family housing complex next door. Transitional commercial uses could provide
convenience services to the residential areas immediately adjacent to the site to
the north and west without imposing intense commercial development such as the
proposed gasoline station with its attendant odors, noise, and glare.
6. "Urban development should be permitted, when it is compatible with the natural and
human environment." (Policy 1.A.2) Conversely, it could be stated that urban
development should not be permitted when it is incompatible. A gasoline service
station immediately abutting residential development is an incompatible use.
The various goals and policies cited herein provide ample justification to deny the
applicant ability to develop the intended use on the subject site.
SA-066-82 Page Five
DECISION:
The site plan for a proposed gasoline service station is not approved.
ORDERED THIS 16th day of November, 1982.
Fred J. Ka fan
Land Use He ring Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 16th day of November, 1982, by Affidavit of Mailing to the
parties of record:
Louis Peretti , 115 Monterey Place N.E. , Renton, WA 98055
Floyd Shaff, Chairman of the Board, Renton Housing Authority,
P.O. Box 2316, Renton, WA 98056
A. J. Ladner, Executive Director, Renton Housing Authority,
P.O. Box 2316, Renton, WA 98056
TRANSMITTED THIS 16th day of November, 1982, to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
David Clemens, Policy Development Director
Members, Renton Planning Commission
Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director
Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
Lawrence J . Warren, City Attorney
Renton Record-Chronicle
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City 's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before November 30, 1982. Any aggrieved person feeling that
the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,
error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably avail -
able at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within
fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner' s decision. This request shall set
forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after
review of the record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that
such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting
other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or
purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall .
c;a--,v,1•-. .-;! a dL i i".o-.1 d L71`r'••171 v 4
9,vv.. d = •c.,``Zi3 ice:JE% 3 . Jed I c •^h'r+ Jld
H.: '1 N r-1.3 a11
v.-)•
o
a(
D-7NI r .1.L ra•t- A1.
a ,'%,.Co' N ,5s'00Z j u
r rs
ti It\1 7.O M t l.. 0,1
O fn
J
J I \Y
I h •Tra 1.rr2 g C
1 11v WdJ13/34 1s
I-, r 1nI a
in a w d o 11 " a o r'
j J
4:,1)1_44 -.1
1 1
t f tom 7 11
14 i t \ ',
n ."
1111. V 41\
ni 1 P a ./;
N ; 3L;;1
t
W YwaV at,a,4 :
e,erOA .--).-,4 lk.` f'. t. .
r
0
a, J
Wrei 3-ar:,,1 -
I ,
r —9 ~? 1+
ayr4
5'• 1494 06 - swg . Z - 1r 103
la \
I i
11,,
r/ JvtiJ Z l•'dg I ,L•vG
a' '• b s
V/1/%711. 271 n7 a e, 771 A7as ).'y e
41.
I O1!cgt-440W3n3d 'ecru poi'K,CB h Wdb ,
F '
1.
1 a ,'I N d
t F Q
s.
y-,/
n .,•\ 1
1 i itiv.i. F,(..:,,,......:, ,
0 JAC)ItiCy4 . *-•
r;•..t3
int• ; ?,1rvv'1 I
9 ay .a•?- q -.r,.f'.='..r: VW I-r, ,r =1 b
CITY OF RENTON
LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
NOVEMBER 2, 1982
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 9: 00 a.m. :
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING
The applications listed are in order of application number
only and not necessarily the order in which they will be
heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion
of the Hearing Examiner.
SA-066-82 LOUIS PERETTI D/B/A RENTONITES INC.
Application for site plan approval to construct
an eighty (80) foot by forty (40) foot auto
service building; property located on the
north side of N.E. 3rd Street between Index
and Harrington Avenues N.E. extended.
4
V:UIIL,DING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EWER
PUBLIC HEARING
OCTOBER 26 , 1982
APPLICANT: PERETTI , LOUIS
FILE NUMBER: SA-066-82
A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The applicant seeks a site plan approval for an auto
service building.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1 . Owner of Record: Louis Peretti d/b/a
Rentonites , Inc.
2 . Applicant: Louis Peretti
3 . Location:
Vicinity Map Attached) North side of N.E.
3rd Street between
Index Avenue N.E. and
Harrington Avenue
N.E. (extended) .
4 . Legal Description: A detailed legal
description is available
on file in the Renton
Building & Zoning
Department.
5. Size of Property: 38,000 square feet.
6. Access:Via N.E. 3rd Street.
7. Existing Zoning: B-1 , Business Use.
8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : B1-1 , :L-1 , R-1 , G-1 .
9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial.
10. Notification: The applicant was notified
in writing of the hearing
date. Notice was properly
published in the Daily
Record Chronicle on
October 17 , 1982, and
posted in three places
on or near the site as j.
required by City Ordinance
on October 22 , 1982 .
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance
1549 of June 14 , 1956 . It was rezoned from "G" to
B-1 by Ordinance 2085 of April 6 , 1964 and subdivided H
in the Tino Cuqini Short Plat 384-79 of August 17 , 1979.
ii
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PERETTI , LOUIS: -066-82
OCTOBER 26 , 198'..
PAGE TWO
D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1 . Topography: The site is essentially level.
2. Soils : Arent, Everett Material (An) . Permeability
is rapid and available water capacity is low.
Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight.
This soil is used for urban development.
3. Vegetation: Scrub grasses exist on the site.
At sometime in the past most natural vegetation
was removed.
4 . Wildlife: Some rodents and small birds inhabit
the subject site.
5. Water: No surface water was observed on the subject
site (October 22, 1982) .
6. Land Use: The subject site is undeveloped at this
time. Properties to the east and south remain
undeveloped. A small multiple family complex is
nearing completion adjacent on the west and north.
E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
The area is in transition from generally undeveloped
and low intensity land uses to a mixture of multiple
family and commercial.
F. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1 . Water and Sewer : A sixteen (16) inch water main
runs along N.E. 3rd Street in a northeasterly -
southwesterly direction and an eight (8) inch water
main runs east-west on N.E. 4th Street. A new
eight (8) inch water main intertie has just been
completed through the Renton Housing Authority
project approximately eighty (80) feet to the west.
An eight (8) inch sanitary sewer is located along
the northern property line.
2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton
as per ordinance requirements.
3. Transit : METRO Transit Route #107 operates along
Monroe Avenue N.E. within one-quarter (1/4) mile
to the east of the subject site.
4 . Schools : Not applicable .
5. Recreation: Not applicable .
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1 . Section 4-711 , B-1 ; Business Use.
H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER
OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT:
1 . Policy Element, Comprehensive Plan, Section 5.A,
page 11 , Commercial Area Policies.
2. Policy Element, Comprehensive Plan, Section 5.B,
page 12, Commercial Structures and Site Policies.
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PERETTI, LOUIS; ,-066-82
OCTOBER 26, 198..
PAGE THREE
3. Policy Element, Comprehensive Plan, Section 7.C,
page 16, Streets Policies.
4 . Policy Element, Comprehensive Plan, Section 4 .D,
page 10, Impact on the Area Policies.
5. Policy Element, Comprehensive Plan, Section 4 .C,
page 9, Housing Density Policies.
6. Policy Element, Comprehensive Plan, Section 3.C,
pages 6 & 7, Landscape Policies.
I. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT:
1 . Natural Systems : Development of the subject sitewillremovethevegetation, disturb the soils,
increase storm water runoff and have an affect
on traffic and noise levels in the vicinity. Through
proper development controls and procedures, however,
the impacts can be mitigated.
2 . Population/Employment: The proposed use may resultinsomeadditionalemploymentopportunitiesfor
residents of the general vicinity.
3. Schools: Not applicable.
4 . Social: Minor.
5. Traffic : Based upon ITE standards of 133 averagedailytripsperpump, the subject proposal of four4) gasoline pumps and diesel pump would generate
approximately 665 trips per day.
J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS ''/THREStOLD DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental OrdinanceandtheStateEnvironmentalPolicyActof1971, as amended,RCW 43-21C, a final declaration of non-significance
was issued for the subject proposal by the EnvironmentalReviewCommitteeonOctober4, 1982.
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1 . City of Renton Building & Zoning Department.2 . City of Renton Design Engineering Division.3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division.4 . City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division.5. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau.
6. City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department.7. City of Renton Policy Development Department.
L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1 . The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan designation of Commercial and the present
zoning of B-1 , Business Use.
2 . The proposal is to construct a 3,200 square foot
building on a 38,000 square foot commercial lot.
The building will house an auto service facilityincludinggasolinepumps. The building will have
a maximum height of seventeen ( 17) feet and will
be constructed from concrete block and brick.
The site plan shows that the building is the first
phase of development of the 38, 000 square foot
parcel.
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PERETTI , LOUIS; -066-82
OCTOBER 26, 198..
PAGE FOUR
3. The Environmental Review Committee has issued a
declaration of non-significance subject to two
conditions. The first conditions is that no left
turns shall be permitted onto or out of the subject
site on to N.E. 3rd Street. A median barrier shall
be installed by the applicant on N.E. 3rd Street
to preclude left turns. The second condition was
that the storm water retention system be designed
to recharge the natural aquifer.
4 . The project proposal generally complies with the
goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
However, it does appear to be in specific conflict
with the intent of several policies which suggest
the separation of incompatible uses. In this specific
case, we are dealing with a high intensity commercial
activity and an adjoining multiple family activity.
Policy 5.A. 7 on page 11 , Policy 5.B. 3 on page 12,
Policy 4.D. 2 & 4 .C. 5 on page 9, and Policy 3.C. 3
on page 7, all suggest that setbacks and adequate
landscape screening should be provided between
dissimilar uses.
The specific proposal would allow the construction
of an eighty (80) foot long, seventeen (17) foot
high commercial building without windows only five
feet from the residential property line. Even
though the site plan approval for the multiple
family residential development required substantial
landscaping along their eastern property line,
it would appear that the commercial activity would
intrude into the residential function. The building
itself will provide partial site screening of the
subject site from the residential development to
the west and north. However, glare from the parking
lot will intrude into the residential area unless
a solid sight obscuring fence is constructed south
of the proposed building along the western property
line.
To assure the establishment of adequate buffers
on the entire commercial site prior to the development
of the second phase, the western and northern perimeters
of the site should be landscaped with comparable
landscaping materials that have been utilized in
the adjacent multiple family development. To provide
sufficient area for the landscaping buffer, the
parking lot and building should be located at least
fifteen (15) feet from the western and northern
property lines. Landscaping should be installed
in this fifteen (15) foot area at the present time.
5. Both the Police and Policy Development Departments
are concerned with the buffering between the proposed
service center and the adjacent residential uses.
In addition, Policy Development has voiced concerns
with the compatibility of building architecture,
lighting and the effects of noise with the existing
multiple family residential. Providing sufficient
buffering between the two uses should reduce the
noise, glare and aesthetic impacts of the proposal
upon the existing adjacent uses.
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PERETTI, LOUIS: -066-82
OCTOBER 26, 198.. FIPAGEFIVE
6. The Building Division advises that a ten (10) foot
landscaped setback is required along N.E. 3rd Street
per ordinance requirements.
7. The Fire Department is concerned with on-site maneauvering
of emergency vehicles. It does not provide a clear
twenty (20) foot access drive for ingress and egress.
Furthermore, the site plan suggests a potential
difficulty with maneauvering large gasoline tanker
trucks on the site to service the gasoline pumps.
It would appear that the entire function would
have to be relocated slightly to the north to allow
appropriate emergency access and maneauvering for
vehicles.
8. The Utilities Division of the Public Works Department
advises that latecomer ' s fees will be required
for water in the amount of $913.34 .
9. Department comments are attached for the Examiner ' s
and the public review.
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:
Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that
the site approval, file SA-066-82, be approved subject
to the following conditions :
1 . Provision for a minimum of a fifteen (15) foot
landscaped setback along the western and northern
property lines. Landscaping plans to be approved
by the City's Landscape Architect.
2. Construction of a six (6) foot sight obscuring
fence along the western property line south of
the building to the public right-of-way.
3. Redesign of the site to allow emergency vehicle
access per code requirements and maneauvering of
gasoline tank trucks on the subject site. Approval
to granted by the Fire Department and Building
and Zoning Departments.
4 . Provision for lighting to compatible and directed
away from the multiple family use area and the
public right-of-way.
5. Provision for a ten (10) foot landscaped setback
required along N.E. 3rd Street.
mil\
l'ir
16•' T' I. f
s+
t<., 2 1 . 2
sT 1- 75— 3' , $ ' --.i*4 l s
t t_6 i .- ; - 11111111N"&" 4! 11. 1 i til"3 1 4. ..1' • , la Itcs`s,IC.. .1‘\
1 Al 9
S"
VI ,,-cc..`-li t, ks --,-r- i /k 3
5\, 5,:!). jet), „ 4IP :,) 1 , ' i ' . '... .` 1 ,
FT ikx --.
6 -
I
Lilt,
1,
tl
Z IlIV‘.. _ ... II 111 .--. - '2
gurc (t... ..'1 'V 24%
WI
r.-
4 '...'..'
s, 1 '' vi.,4
1:2 4:43:1 '4 3 7 . . ,-;"-.7- "."--, 11, tid•I
1 _ \ %1,, \
gleAs
N 30 a 6
r.,>\ —.
1 ‘ IN .... 0 %.
1
s,'
s ‘
j.c..
1',.. \....)
i /4 /3 , •. 31 co. 4 7 $ / ' __ s A;.,1
nt`
A• •
S a
1
n
7
e C 9 5' SH 9 c5'S W t ,. l- I
Sao\ \ or- 6 /' 6 66,7,i vti ., J
s
o R /9201'1 l '
Q
S/ 5- 54 .ti4 r-• tiN
R • '' 4 1"
WINDSOR HILLS m, ,, ; ,r
PARK
J,,L 4 w,'
1
I
A,1 Q'3 -'IAll$2`j79 ;H 77 /6 /617,J ;3 ,'t7/ 6• -0 .i . Ir• I •
v r
1. L 11 1-1 __
10' 2 r • 1
3 i f 7, - ' :
G1. R...4
03.44170
Rv...4
LOW 1
7/
I •
S
SITE APPROVAL: PERETTI, LOUIS, SA-066-82
4
APPLICANT PERETTI, Louis TOTAL AREA ±38,000 sq. ft.
PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via N.E. 3rd Street
EXISTING ZONING B-1, Business Use
EXISTING USE Vacant
PROPOSED USE Auto Service Building
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial
COMMENTS
i
4C r...it: G..ly MX•t. 'i=t.:,& JC s_c.o".: t.<.:. Ev Z
L A V ffrC•AF .1:v
A:N
I 3.-- ` ,°:Q --,-.' -t .1-E.Crd L..;Ee
si1 Dt`` fit rJ YARV
t
l
L' i-r, '•PI. E.‘.. h CL> ExT-u-T (.F 0
PNASE _• I
tt-•
1'' a
avMt , 6o'x 4o' .C•oG. vE/eLof"-1 jr o
9 aY ;'aeR.v1GE ' vi ..e su K e
t :." --y4'Ke-e MAY I BAY Z. MAY/
fir. I
1 c i
C f LATER
t
y'•N v( 6. t ExtT A{ - 2G BAK ITed• t64t IS'
4
V 4 '
t 2 -
GOUe.-E /uM% 0 2.
1- i-- et;'GN w ,Nvrep `.atJE A¢ ill0eA0
F. r° I C I its
di
A, :Kit, ;-\\ CI -'• ‘
r? -'• I-4c.:
1 4: --;:. -,j ,_Ot 6.,..„...„1,.
t
e\
r I'.
ilile
S. 4:- (.. ,
I F LIT u g
A
t /
P e v. L. a p NI a T- ---
f'
vL va..--' t i i
E4TE.#4" c PHASE.
i•, 2*, DE,/ELCVMEti1T
1T E.g.- 4 I ,
E x1 T
A1.
r Fia` •,ri ita.:T
N O I'
o (I) q.n' 2.00.s5' tv ;' '2.1 E
n IFL:A.Et -r-r 1-I0.1
t m
00 m ITa FLAt-i I,:G;:' - ,•I7
1
eriG.f.i-L• I"= 201-0'
FAC-r-144:, s I P S. 400 '-# Gt c BL . = e' PA.ce
eAKK,N16. it.0.•/tPl=P = ,n sPoc.tEs
RENTON BUILDING & ZONING )ARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF — 069 — 82
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to construct a
80 foot by 40 foot auto service building . REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N,E. 3rd Street between Index
and Harrington Avenues extended.
TO :
0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-29-8:
OENGINEERING DIVISION
1 TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
F-1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
14POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
l ] OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5: 00 P .M. ON September 28, 1982
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : e0‘;`G
OAPPROVED 11APPROVED WIT CONDITIONS FINN APPROVED
eti 10 40,S Ae,1/
i4e/// /e/c 647,/c/4A% dlweat?
giclAy /°I` 4. 5 .
3 ilea/ idA PC s.
i',66y
i,)du,3 4r44*/
Q P i66 /id/S. // 7/ -46,r/64re ‘//4
DES f 7 5
AO,
DATE :
SIG l}ff IIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
9/
REVISION 5/1982
El APPROVED E APPROVED WITH CONDI1 S n NOT APPROVED
1) No left turns into the service center from N.E. 3rd be allowed/ the proponent should ha% !
to install a center median barrier to prevent such turns.
2) Lighting on the sight be placed so it does not shine out onto the roadway or so it does :u
shine into the apartments directly behind the service center.
3) Adqueate buffer be placed between the apartment house and service center to prevent noise.
from filtering directly into apartment complex. Also so children from complex are not
attracted over into the service center.
Lt. D.R. Persson DATE .9/30/82
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/19 2
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
OAPPROVED I7I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED
fl.,;1.421cvis .40 a-r-r--cr,r---e .0e 04.-441-----
0 C T 4 1982
Zi).--r ,.
d` DATE :9 2 Vci.SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR •UTHIIRIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/198
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
7111111APPROVEDOAPPROVEDWITHCONDITIONSnNOTAPPROVED
i+' r
r,. O C T 4 1982 .,,;
Z._
DATE:
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED RE PRESENTATIVE
RFVMIl1N ciic n7
ri APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDI NS 57NOT APPROVED
SlTc /pG.Oic/ aOET it/O T / ,ep (/iO --:" f---O/e /92DEGJ!/f1 rc111,4A E,}fc,-2 i,c-C OG 041 C 2C.etiC
3— 3-7--_ -5`T j ,a)r i"/1 o vi.[3C A it/O.0 —T.e4s i4Q'4'/t--;/G Lf},t/g , .,e ?L4c Eti1 N; of ,,-1126 / 19p4,04 Tv SS/7 ,eZAIt) Sz.,oa.e...,0 ot/,' " ".“--01.e
o //VG ESr
GL6'-4, ' Z o ' /S E IGo G,es S.S . fc_CErS
DATE : ?- -2/ - 474-SIN U OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/19 S
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :B(:1) %6;
EJAPPROVED IETAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS LI NOT APPROVED
16 ' 4rvBSc:1P s-7`-EAci: 1-
GZ -Q. 0 u 6 ti - JD -S r
111111" -- 2r- --- _DATE: ?-2-- -;d2
SIGNATURE 0- ? ' CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
40111.
fr
REVISION 5/19E 2
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ION ; 4/Il.lT'C5
fl APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS fl NOT APPROVED
UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO 9/.2 7/rZ
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER 4-5 -. ./ 3 a0 W /%3LATECOMERSAGREEMENT • SEVERIl
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SEWER I
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • WATER d
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • SEWER
APPROVED WATER PLAN
ii
APPROVED SEWER PLAN
0
d
I'
APPROVED FIR' HYDRANT LOCATIONS
BY FIRE DEPT. IyesFIREFLOWANASISNo
in 1 --''L6-2A-p_V-I I I
DATE : 9 27 72
SIGNATURELOF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No (:3) : SA-066-82
Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-069-82
Description of Proposal: Application for site plan
approval to construct an
80 foot by 40 foot auto
service building.
Proponent: Louis Peretti, D/B/A
Rentonites Inc.
Location of Proposal:Property located on the
north side of N.E. 3rd
Street between Index and
Harrington Avenues extended .
Lead Agency: City of Renton Building
and Zoning Department.
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on September 29, 1982 ,
following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building
and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from:
Richard Houghton, Ronald Nelson, David Clemens, Roger Blaylock,
Donald Persson and James Matthew.
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings
of the ERC on application ECF-069-82 are the following:
1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by:
Louis Peretti DATED: September 16 , 1982
2) Applications: Site Approval (SA-066-82)
3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance:
Building and Zoning Department, Utility Engineering
Division.
More Information: Fire Prevention Bureau, Policy Development
Department.
Recommendations for a declaration of significance: Police
Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined
this development has a non-significant adverse impact on
the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 ( 2) (c) .
This decision was made after review by the lead agency of
a complete environmental checklist and other information
un file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance:
Will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties
and that the following conditions shall be complied with:
1 ) No left turns shall be permitted into or out of the
subject site onto N.E. 3rd Street. A median barrier
shall be installed by the applicant.
2) The storm water retention system shall be designed to
recharge the natural aquifer.
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
LOUIS PERETTI D/B/A RENTONITES INC. : ECF-069-82 , SA-066-82
OCTOBER 4 , 1982
PAGE TWO
Signatures:
4)/
7
CGS
Rbnald G. Nelson David R. Clemens
Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director
Ri hard C. Houghton /
Public Works Directd
DATE OF PUBLICATION: OCTOBER 4 , 1982
EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: OCTOBER 18, 1982
Date circu' ' ed : SEPT. 21 , 1982 C tents due: Sept. 22, 1982
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ..VIEW SHEET
ECF -
069 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Perette D/B/A Rentonites Inc.
PROJECT TITLE :Auto Service Center
Brief Description of Project : Application for site plan approval
11
to construct an 80 foot by 40 foot auto service building.
The property is located on the nortn side or N. t. 3r '
LOCATION :Street between Index and Harrington Avenues extended.
SITE AREA : 38,000 sq. ftBUILDING AREA (gross)3,200 sq. ft.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INF0
1 ) Topographic changes : X
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X
3) Water & water courses : X
4 ) Plant life : X
5 ) Animal life : X
6) Noise :
X
7 ) Light & glare : X
8 ) Land Use ; north : New multi-family residential
east :Vacant
south: Vacant
west :New multi-family residential
Land use conflicts : Residential to west & north.
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources : X
10 ) Risk of upset : X
11 ) Population/Employment : X
12 ) Number of Dwellings : X
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts : Must be evaluated
14 ) Public services : I X
15 ) Energy : X
16) Utilities : X
17 ) Human health:X
18) Aesthetics : X
19 ) Recreation: X
20 ) Archeology/history : X
COMMENTS :
Signatures :
7" /0 77;7
Ronald G. Nelson David R. Clemens
Building Official Policy Development Director
Richard C. Houghton,
Public Works Director
L
f
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING
EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON NOVEMBER 2, 1982, AT 9: 00
A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION:
LOUIS PERETTI D/B/A RENTONITES INC.
Application for site plan approval to construct an eighty80) foot by forty (40) foot auto service building,
file SA-066-82; property located on the north side of
N.E. 3rd Street between Index and Harrington Avenues
N.E. extended.
Legal descriptions of the file noted above are on file in
the Renton Building and Zoning Department.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE
PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 2 , 1982, AT 9 : 00
A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
PUBLISHED: OCTOBER 17 , 1982 RONALD G. NELSON
BUILDING AND ZONING
DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE
ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to
before me, a Notary Public, in
and for the State of Washington
residing in King County, on the
15 day of October 1982.
1C/ k WQ SIGNED:
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final
declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following
project:
LOUIS PERETTI D/B/A RENTONITES INC. (ECF-069-82)
Application for site plan approval to construct an eighty
80) foot by forty (40) foot auto service building,
file SA-066-82 ; property located on the north side of
N.E. 3rd Street between Index and Harrington Avenues
N.E. extended.
Further information regarding this action is available in
the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton,
Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed
with the Hearing Examiner by October 18, 1982.
Published: October 4 , 1982
i
REWN BUILDING & ZONING D4RTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 069 - 82
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : Application for site plan approval to construct a
80 foot by 40 foot auto service building . REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between Index
and Harrington Avenues extended.
TO :
I (
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-29-82
0 ENGINEERING DIVISION
l ( TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1
n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
I ] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
l (
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
IRIPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ri OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5: 00 P .M. ON September 28, 1982
r
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : f ? frc-ed1/14a/
El APPROVED El APPROVED WIT CONDITIONS Fil NOT APPROVED
i .tea si' 6.0s 74 , 5/
2) &'% ' % 6 df-'7/6/61 td '
5)
y1 Alc aes .
des
I) 4/g/ G. ei‘e,4 dil,31/ a aixf./.Atta/.
f4e & 7e,:
ifig//s- lza u 6s/ / / '?' d411''
at • 7,,,, da. 1,3 -e.42e,is
1tzds ,57/
7
DATE : A/A!.
SIG URE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
RE )N BUILDING & ZONING Di RTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF — 069 — 82
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to construct a
80 foot by 40 foot auto service building . REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between Index
and Harrington Avenues extended.
TO :
r-] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-29-82
DENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
14POLICE DEPARTMENT
t ' POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON September 28, 1982
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE
I (
APPROVED xx APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
I ( NOT APPROVED
1) No left turns into the service center from N.E. 3rd be allowed/ the proponent should have
to install a center median barrier to prevent such turns.
2) Lighting on the sight be placed so it does not shine out onto the roadway or so it does not
shine into the apartments directly behind the service center.
3) Adqueate buffer be placed between the apartment house and service center to prevent noise
from filtering directly into apartment complex. Also so children from complex are not
attracted over into the service center.
7,;57 -
L't. D.R. Persson DATE :9/30/82
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
RE )N BUILDING & ZONING DI RTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 069 - 82
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to construct a
80 foot by 40 foot auto service building . REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between Index
and Harrington Avenues extended.
TO :
n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-29-82
ENGINEERING DIVISION
l ] TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
NIFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
I ] POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
OOTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON September 28, 1982
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : i2
I ! APPROVED l ] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
1/1i E<t 2-1 1S o 9rir e2G 6-A/c y 7/1/r . -CJS aA_/ 7"&"
S:;1 . 0 .
ei
57Tee-th-7 T A b7" P2-01/462C 4 it/O.0
isi!C ie2//G 4,1%1/ t E,u; OF /-fieC- 4TvS
S AAJ SY,/pt/L /97o(/o -
j
l Ol GEa/Z Zo ' 1 ZW/Ue
God /A) /2Esr S • Ice&CS'
DATE : 9- _2/ — ,7 -
SIGN U OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
RE111113N BUILDING & ZONING D4RTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF — 069 — 82
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : Application for site plan approval to construct a
80 foot by 40 foot auto service building . REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between Index
and Harrington Avenues extended.
TO :
11 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-29-82
i ] ENGINEERING DIVISION
1 TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
I ( FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
6iPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
l ] POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
l ' OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON September 28, 1982
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : BC .)
I ! APPROVED ElAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
6 ' < 4/0 c'1(4‘f; s ue Z/c, : C- f
G._c-a 0 6 A/e5F 42) E-7'
r I-o_ DATE : ?-2--fe) 412
SIGNATURE 0 CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
RE )N BUILDING & ZONING DI RTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 069 — 82
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to construct a
80 foot by 40 foot auto service building . REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between Index
and Harrington Avenues extended.
TO :
I ( PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-29-82
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
XUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
l ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON September 28 , 1982
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ION : TiGS
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
l ( NOT APPROVED
I UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO q/oZ/ea
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER X-S 3 3_4( „eot - 3
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER NO 1SYSTEMDEVELOPMENTCHARGE - WATER
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SEWER Ntei
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • WATER No
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SEWER _NO
APPROVED WATER PLAN ND
APPROVED SEWER PLAN ND
APPROVED FIR' HYDRANT LOCATIONS
BY FIKE DEPT. RS
FIRE FLOW ANA SIS 4
DATE : 27 /ri ,
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
REN BUILDING & ZONING DE.RTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 069 - 82
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : Application for site plan approval to construct a
80 foot by 40 foot auto service building . REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between Index
and Harrington Avenues extended.
TO :
71 WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-29-82
XENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
I !
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
I ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
I ( OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON September 28, 1982
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
1-1 APPROVED CZ] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
I ( NOT APPROVED
N r o 4*41i__
E6 gad. FiEN TON
0 C T 4 1982 j
DATE :_
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTH RIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
RE )N BUILDING & ZONING DE RTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF — 069 — 82
APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE APPROVAL (SA-066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for site plan approval to construct a
80 foot by 40 foot auto service building . REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between Index
and Harrington Avenues extended.
TO :
L IPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 9-29-82
OENGINEERING DIVISION
NTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
l IFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
l ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
l ( POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
l ( OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON September 28, 1982
1
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : i Fl=iz
ETAPPROVED i ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED
CITY OP T(k; TON
rj 161
O C T 4 1982 LLI
BUILDING/Lv VNNG DEPT.
E' er
DAT E , 2/2_
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIV E
REVISION 5/1982
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No (:3) : SA-066-82
Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-069-82
Description of Proposal: Application for site plan
approval to construct an
80 foot by 40 foot auto
service building.
Proponent: Louis Peretti, D/B/A
Rentonites Inc.
Location of Proposal:Property located on the
north side of N.E. 3rd
Street between Index and
Harrington Avenues extended.
Lead Agency: City of Renton Building
and Zoning Department.
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on September 29 , 1982 ,
following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building
and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from:
Richard Houghton, Ronald Nelson, David Clemens, Roger Blaylock,
Donald Persson and James Matthew.
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings
of the ERC on application ECF-069-82 are the following:
1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by:
Louis Peretti DATED: September 16 , 1982
2) Applications : Site Approval (SA-066-82)
3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance:
Building and Zoning Department, Utility Engineering
Division.
More Information: Fire Prevention Bureau, Policy Development
Department.
Recommendations for a declaration of significance: Police
Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined
this development has a non-significant adverse impact on
the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 ( 2) (c) .
This decision was made after review by the lead agency of
a complete environmental checklist and other information
on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance:
Will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties
and that the following conditions shall be complied with:
1 ) No left turns shall be permitted into or out of the
subject site onto N.E. 3rd Street. A median barrier
shall be installed by the applicant.
I
2) The storm water retention system shall be designed to
recharge the natural aquifer.
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
LOUIS PERETTI D/B/A RENTONITES INC. : ECF-069-82, SA-066-82
OCTOBER 4 , 1982
PAGE TWO
Signatures:
IZT .;(
1/-/:7 7
2(1 11((i/J
Rb naZ Nelsono G. Net o David R. Clemens
Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director
Ri hard C. Houghton
Public Works Direct
DATE OF PUBLICATION: OCTOBER 4 , 1982
EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: OCTOBER 18 , 1982
Date circulated : SEPT. 21 , 1982 Comments due : Sept. 22, 1982
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF -
069 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-066-82)
TI
PROPONENT : Louis Perette D/B/A Rentonites Inc.
PROJECT TITLE :Auto Service Center
Brief Description of Project : Application for site plan approval
to construct an 80 foot by 40 foot auto service building.
The property is located on the north side or N. L. .era
LOCATION :Street between Index and Harrington Avenues extended.
SITE AREA :38,000 sq. ftBUILDING AREA (gross)3,200 sq. ft.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : X
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X
3 ) Water & water courses : X
4 ) Plant life : X
5 ) Animal life : X
6 ) Noise : X
7 ) Light & glare : X
8 ) Land Use ; north : New multi-family residential
east :Vacant
south : Vacant
west :New multi-family residential
Land use conflicts : Residential to west & north.
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
w
X
10 ) Risk of upset : X
11 ) Population/Employment : X
12 ) Number of Dwellings :X
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts : Must be evaluated
14 ) Public services : X
15 ) Energy : X
16 ) Utilities : X
17 ) Human health :X
18) Aesthetics : X
19) Recreation: X
20 ) Archeology/history : X
COMMENTS :
Signatures:
2C
Ronald G. Nelson David R. Clemens
Building Official Policy Development Director
Richard C. Houghton,
Public Works Director
Date circulated : Sept. 21, 1982 Comments due : Sept. 22, 1982
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 069 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL SA_066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
Brief Description of Project : Application for site plan approval to construct
a 80 foot by 40 foot auto service building. REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between
Index and Harrington Avenues extended.
SITE AREA : + 38,000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross ) 3,200 sq. ft.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
1
l/
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings : v
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history . @ ) 1f1 Ie3
COMMENTS :
rl . . y .
U OCT 4 1982
f:!1?f_ir"iNG/:)N;i`IG DEPT.
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information`
Reviewed by : itle :
I/;
Date : Z 4-2/
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulated : Sept. 21, 1982 Comments due : Sept. 22, 1982
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 069 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
Brief Description of Project : Application for site plan approval to construct
a 80 foot by 40 foot auto service building. REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between
Index and Harrington Avenues extended.
SITE AREA : + 38,000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross ) 3,200 sq. ft.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : i
3) Water & water courses : L
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare : 1
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources : v`
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts : AC, /J *')'<
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy : i
16 ) Utilities : t/
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics : L
19 ) Recreation : L
r,tH
20 ) Archeology/history :fi slog q ICOMMENTS :
OCT 4 1982
DEPT.
Recommendation : DNSI V DOS More Information
Reviewed by : 74 P""`"-- Tltle : /6 ic 267C/di.J7- r
Date : l / 0)2FORM: ERC-06
MLOIN
4 a'1C
Date circulated : Dept. 21, 1982 Comments due : Sept. 2g, 1982
ENVIRONMEINTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 069 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
Brief Description of Project : Application for site plan approval to construct
a 80 foot by 40 foot auto service building. REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between
Index and Harrington Avenues extended.
SITE AREA : + 38,000 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA (gross ) 3,200 sq. ft.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : K
V
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life : K
6) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
4
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health : Vr
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : SI DOS More Information
Reviewed by : litle :
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
FIRE
Date circulated : wept. 21, 1982 Comments due :
ENIVIRONIMENTAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEIE Firepreventon'Bureau
Y
I
n
ECF - 069 - 82 U L r 5aWT, 6
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA_066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti SEP 2 1 1982
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
Brief Description of Project : Application for site plan approval to construct
a 80 foot by 40 foot auto service building. REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between
Index and Harrington Avenues extended.
SITE AREA : + 38,000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross ) 3,200 sq. ft.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : v/
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
L,.
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy : L
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
ytJ sc/O L v 2:)Es..4 tl,st. L CO C/1 T/v.J O Ga I a S e v v og,c G,c a,/
s%b Ar GC TANK r „KoieG.aS oL '/vim', %2J /fffEJ4,.0 TZi2 /T %J /7idG/G UAy-
7? .TEE "/o!J ZEL i I/ )/ 7,—"W eZi 41/G G 3 F p rrc- 7 f4CGC-JS
i TE S,4LELy fp2/ O i,t)G. S/TE , S ovz.0
fie.-0,4OE 7/1 Ee,//cI E •4ceESf T,yil A2E/ oc Ale" 3Rpi.S o o,egfy GaJirk 7it/1-pGr;iG r E.pc`CT i E /
f ,
CA S- D^/Recommendat ior5 : ONSI DuS More 1n1orma lon
TkE
s1Ia I1,
Reviewed by :
Date : ez
FORM: ERC-06
OTIL TIEF4
Date circulated : Sept. 21, 1982 Comments due : Sept. 22, 1982
ENIVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 069 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
Brief Description of Project : Application for site plan approval to construct
a 80 foot by 40 foot auto service building. REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between
Index and Harrington Avenues extended.
SITE AREA : ± 38,000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross ) 3,200 sq. ft.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses : v/
4 ) Plant life : Vt
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise : V/
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources : V/
10 ) Risk of upset : V
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :V/
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
V
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history : v/
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : NS t/ DOS MoreInformationIformation
Reviewed by : I itle : vT//./TY 4-AI6//sIE R
Date : 7// 27 / '&.
FORM: ERC-06
I.
Date circulated : „apt. 21, 1982 Comments due : Sept. 28, 1982
ENIVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 069 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA_066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
Brief Description of Project : Application for site plan approval to construct
a 80 foot by 40 foot auto service building. REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between
Index and Harrington Avenues extended.
SITE AREA : + 38,000 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA (gross ) 3,200 sq. ft.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : X
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X
3 ) Water & water courses :e4196 fc -
4 ) Plant life : 7(
5 ) Animal life :X
6) Noise : X 0 Q Cam!
7 ) Light & glare :X
8 ) Land Use ; north : N/'Qt/'A/
east : 41441.44
south :
f
west : 40- A"i,(c 45/SicdegLanduseconflicts : (9 azAttak /Z
View obstruction : 9%/44& f
9) Natural resources : X
10 ) Risk of upset : x
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
I
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts : ,1071L el4e4 4'
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health : X
18 ) Aesthetics : x
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
gi givolli 6Q7 //I 6q' z/ -ieegli.
SC c A /kV A á9'
Recommendation : D SI DOS Mor , Informat on_J`
Reviewed by : Lill/__% / litle :
Date :h . s
FORM: ERC-06
row ce
Date circulated : Sept. 21, 1982 Comments due : Sept. 22, 1982
ENVIRONMENITAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 069 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-066-82)
PROPONENT : Louis Peretti
PROJECT TITLE : Auto Service Center
Brief Description of Project : Application for site plan approval to construct
a 80 foot by 40 foot auto service building. REF: Tino Cugini Short Plat II 384-79
LOCATION : The property is located on the north side of N.E. 3rd Street between
Index and Harrington Avenues extended.
SITE AREA : + 38,000 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross ) 3,200 sq. ft.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts : vr
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI DOS , More Information
Reviewed Title :
Date : 7
FORM: ERC-06
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
SEPTEMBER 29 , 1982
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 10: 00 A.M. :
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
NEW BUSINESS
ECF-069-82 LOUIS PERETTI
SA-066-82 Application for site plan approval to construct
an eighty (80) foot by forty (40) foot auto
service building; property located on the
north side of N.E. 3rd Street between Index
and Harrington Avenues N.E. extended.
STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF GAME
Letter from Betsy Wolin and Bob Zeigler, thanking
the Environmental Review Committee for the
opportunity to discuss their program.
r
ti(cY o C CY OF RENTOT
T
FILE NO(S):
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
bill
MASTER APPLICATION
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only L.,,ose
items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed.
Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION
NAME
FEES
Louis Peretti Q REZONE*(FROM TO
ADDRESS
El1033N . First Street t SPECIAL PERMIT*
CITY ZIP
0 TEMPORARY PERMIT*
Renton, Washington 98055
r
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT*
TELEPHONE
l Xi SITE PLAN APPROVAL J0!j OO
2 0 6) 2 5 5-2 4 8 4
n GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT
No. of Cubic Yards:
CONTACT PERSON
VARIANCE
O From Section:
Justification Required
NAME
Louis Peretti
ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS:
1033 N . First Street Q SHORT PLAT
CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT
Renton , Washington 98055 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT
TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT
206) 255-2484 Q WAIVER
Justification Required) II
OWNER NO. OF LOTS:
INAMEPLATNAME:
Rentonites , Inc .
ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT:
1033 N . First Street Q PRELIMINARY
CITY ZIP El FINAL
Renton, Washington 98055
P.U.D. NAME:
TELEPHONE
206) 2552484 Residential CI Industrial
EiCommercial 0 Mixed
LOCATION
MOBILE HOME PARKS:
PROPERTY ADDRESS
Q TENTATIVE
EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING
O PRELIMINARY
None 8,4 ED FINAL
PROPOSED USE PARK NAME:
Auto Service Center
NUMBER OF SPACES:
Q ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ln
N. FT. ACRES
AREA:I- 38 , 000 Sc{ . F
f.
TOTAL FEES j j
1'
F ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING
DATE ST I .r°,"'
t'3
I I j , APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: `..
j
CEP 1 61982 ! APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:
4 J LAAAIS
Accepted
0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By:BL.LDING/ZONING DF'I. Initials)
DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY:
APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:
l 2 I-o .i ED Accepted
QIncomplete Notification Sent On By:
Initials)
ROUTED TO:
al Building MI Design Eng. M Fire El Parks
0 Police En Policy Dev. EJ Traffic Eng. El Utilities
REVISION 5/1982
Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet).
Lot 4,
Cugini Short Plat No . 2 as recorded October 18 , 1979,
No . 7910189001 , Vol . 20, Page 214 .
AFFIDAVIT
Louis Peretti being duly sworn, declare that I am
authorized representative to act for the property owner, =owner of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the
information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
d -- DAY OF Sept. 1982
19
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT
Renton, Wash' to
Rentonites Inc. by z2
am f Notary Public) Signature of Owner)
1033 No.1st St.
Address) Address)
Renton, Wa. 98055
City) State) (Zip)
255-2484
Telephone)
Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete
application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in
the "Application Procedure."
1
OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Application No.
Environmental Checklist No.
PROPOSED, date:FINAL , date: i.!
Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS: -), , .-I' :_,f t. )i , ,2). ).
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent RENTONITES, INC.
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
1033 N. FIRST STREET
RENTON, 1ASHINGTON 98055
206) 255-2484
3. Date Checklist submitted
4. Agency requiring Checklist CITY OF RENTON
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
AUTO SERVICE CENTER
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
CONSTRUCTION OF A 80 FT. x 40 FT AUTO SERVICE BUILDING, INCLUDING
PUMP ISLAND, PARKING AND REQUIRED LANDSCAPING.
OF REN, ' '
SEP 1019S2
Bu:LDING/ZONING DEPT.
2-
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal ) :
THE PROPERTY IS FLAT, IS LOCATED ON THE EAST HILL OF RENTON ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF N.E. 3rd STREET (CEMETARY RAOD] . JUST LESS THAN ONE ACRE IN SIZE.
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
SPRING OF 1983
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local --including rezones) :
CITY OF RENTON BUILDING PEPSMIT E RELATED PERMITS
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain:
PROSSIBLE FUTURE EXPANSION OF PROPOSED BUILDING
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal ? If yes , explain :
NO
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic X
substructures?
TES- MAYBE NO
b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over-
X
covering of the soil?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
X
features?
YEE— MAYBE N
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features? X
YES M- YBE NO
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
YES MBE NO
Explanation :
3-
2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
X
YES MAYBE NO
b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature ,
or any change in climate, either locally or
regionally?
X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or
Xtherateandamountofsurfacewaterrunoff?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
X
body?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
YES FTYTE" TO—
M Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
X
ground waters?
YES MAYBE NO
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates , detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria,
X
or other substances into the ground waters?
YES MAYBE NO
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
X
for public water supplies?YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: BUILDING AND PAVED AREA WILL BE ADDED.
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops
X
microflora and aquatic plants)?
YES M YBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
X
endangered species of flora?YES RPM- NO
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X
species? YES MAYBE NO
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X
YES RAYR NO
Explanation:
BUILDING AND PAVED AREA WILL BE ADDED.
4-
5) Fauna. dill the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
X
insects or microfauna)?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
X
endangered species of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area ,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement X
of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
BUILDING AND PAVED AREA WILL BE ADDED.
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X _
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
BUILDING AND AUTO TRAFFIC WILL BE INTORDUCED.
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
X
glare? Yam— MAYBE NO
Explanation:
SIGHT LIGHTING FOR SERVICE STATION WILL BE ADDED.
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
Xpresentorplannedlanduseofanarea?YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including ,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: STORING OF GAS AND OIL.
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population X
of an area?YET— MBE NF
Explanation:
5-
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or
create a demand for additional housing? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in :
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand
for new parking?
X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
a) Fire protection?
X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Police protection?
X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Schools? X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Parks or other recreational facilities?X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services?
X
YES MAYbE NO
Explanation:
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
X
the development of new sources of energy?
YES TOTE NO
Explanation:
ELECTRICAL POWER FOR RUNNING BUSINESS .
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities :
a) Power or natural gas?
X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Communications systems?
X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Water?
X
YES MAYBE NO
r
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Storm water drainage?
X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Solid waste and disposal?
X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public , or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
X
site, structure, object or building?
YES MAYBE TT—
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent:
signed)
Louis Peretti - Rentonites, Inc .
name printed)
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-75
AFFIDAVIT
I, Louis Peretti D/B/A Rentonites Inc. , being duly sworn, declare that
I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me
this day of Sept. 1982
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washing - - d' Renton
01;
4/
G GrliRantnniteSTDCJ
fame :r .tary Public)Signature of Owner)
WNsA. 1033 No. First St
Address)Address)
Y OF REN : NI
t1 fE IN Renton Wa. 98055
LS
City) State)
sEP 1 61982
255-2484
SLIDING/ZONING DEPT. Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Building & Zoning Depart-
ment governing the filing of such application.
Date Received 11 , 1962, By: NAQ,k-kiLiTt
Renton Building & Zoning Department
3-82
CITY OF REND IN NI 24369
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 1 19
RECEIVED OF 'Fl1 /Oh T P Tih.G
S, t_. 4,ae.
O s C'
L"h v_ G
Co sI _ 1/4.1k4/ Fe
TOTAL 7r(7 '
GWEN E . MARSHAL FINANCE DIRECTOR
BY
ENDING •
OF FILE
FILE TITLE