Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA84-067BEGINNINU OF FILE C ! O IMED . FILE TITLEr irdir 04-1 ---- 134 4 11)1ium i of amd v' Applicant Crown Pointe Limited Partnership File No. R-067-84 Project Name same Property Location 3700 Block of N. E. 4th Street HEARING EXAMINER: Date Hearing: 11/13/84 - Decision: 11/29/84 Recommendation Approval Req./Rec. Date Received Date Response Appeal - Date Received Council Approval - Date M1 Ordinance/Resolution # Date Mylar to County for Recordingyyb Mylar Recording # Remarks: Set for City Council 1/21/85 - filing of restrictive covenants required before final action. r A./ y. S.4 a'r OF I o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 0 m BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 90 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 FD SEF'jE00' February 15, 1985 Mr. John Phillips, Attorney 2001 Western Avenue Suite 555 Seattle, WA 98121 Subject: City of Renton - Ordinance No. 3889 Crown Pointe Limited Partnership Dear Mr. Phillips: At its regular meeting of February 4 , 1985, the Renton City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3889 changing the zoning classification of certain properties in the City from Business District (B-1) to Residence District (R-3) . As a condition of the rezone, restrictive covenants were filed with King County Records and Elections under Receiving Recording No. 8501210375 . A copy of the ordinance is enclosed. A copy of recorded covenants will be transmitted to you upon receipt from King County. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Marily J./ Petersen Deputy "ty Clerk Enclosures cc: Hearing Examiner 0607-84 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 1, 1985 TO: Don Monaghan FROM: a9) Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Crown Pointe Rezone Legal Description The City Clerk has recently sent to you the legal description that included an access easement. That easement was not within the scope of the official Assessor's map. Please check tae attached legal description to see that it complies with the underlying Assessor's map and the Tax Rolls. R JB:1 01Z:c1 1303`L EXHIBIT A" CROWN POINTE REZONE R--061--84 PARCEL A The west half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the south 180 feet thereof; PARCEL B The east half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the south 180 feet of the west 250 feet in width thereof; EXCEPT the south 30 feet for road. PARCEL C The westerly 30 feet of the south 180 feet of the east half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the south 30 feet for road. 4 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3889 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1) TO RESIDENCE DISTRICT R-3) (CROWN POINTE LTD PTN R-067-84) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Business District (B-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Building & Zoning Department on or about June 8 , 1984 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about November 13 , 1984 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residence District (R-3) as herein- below specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated November 29 , 1984 ; the Building & 1- ORDINANCE NO. 3889 Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein Said property being located between Monroe Avenue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E. between the 3700 Block of N.E. 4th Street) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about January 10, 1984 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections Receiving No. 8501210375 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approve and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 4th day of February, 1985 . Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 5th day of February, 1985 . cL) ottIN.SCApockeN, Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: February 8 , 1985 2- 1:303Z ORDINANCE NO. 38 EXHIBIT A" CROWN POINTE REZONE R--06784 PARCEL A The west half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarterofSection9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington;EXCEPT the south 180 feet thereof; PARCEL B The east :half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarterofSection9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT .he south 180 feet of the west 250 feet in width thereof; EXCEPT .:he south 30 feet for road. PARCEL The westerly 30 feet of the south 180 feet of the east half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., in ling County, Washington; EXCEPT the south 30 feet for road. 3- 1303Z EXHIBIT A" CROWN POINTE REZONE R--067--84 PARCEL A The wes. half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarterofSecticn9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the south 180 feet thereof; PARCEL B The east half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarterofSection9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the south 180 feet of the west 250 feet in width thereof; EXCEPT the south 30 feet for road. PARCEL C The west:rly 30 feet of the south 180 feet of the east half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,W.M., in .Cing County, Washington; EXCEPT :he south 30 feet for road. A r Renton City Council 2/4/85 Page four Old Business continued Communitt Sister City Participation (6/25/84) - The Committee reviewed Services Committee a report from the Administrative Intern which outlines the Sister City history of the City' s current Sister City Program and offers Participation alternative policies to guide the program in the future. The Committee felt they should gauge public support and interest in the program before considering a request to expand the City' s involvement. A letter was sent to 14 public service and community groups in the City asking for an expression of interest or a willingness to participate in the sister city effort. Only two organizations responded and both stated that they could commit an individual to serve on the committee but could not provide financial support. Continued Based on this limited response, the Committee recommended that the Council adopt the following policy relating to the Sister City Program: In order to focus attention on our existing Sister City Program and avoid competition for limited public and private funds, Renton shall concentrate activities and support exclusively on our current Sister City, Nishiwaki , Japan. The City shall maintain a policy which requires that the total responsibility for that organization, communications and funding to support the Sister City Program rests with a private sponsor group and not with the City of Renton. Cable TV Completion of Cable TV System Construction (Referred 7/2/84) - System Completion Since the City' s cable consultant is scheduled to provide a report to the Committee of the Whole this month, the Committee recommends that this issue be addressed at that time and that no further action is required at the sub- committee level . King County King County Youth Services Funding Letter (Referred 10/15/84) - Youth Se-vices A letter was written to request the results of the hearing Funding on this issue. Information will be shared with Council when received. No further action is required. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second & final reading: Ordinance #3886 An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and transfer Golf Course of funds to the golf course fund to provide for general Fund Transfer operation in the total amount of $492,428.00 from Unanticipated Revenues: Golf Course Green Fees, Investment Interest , Concessions; and Contingency Fund - Operating Transfers-Out , Cumulative Reserve Fund #2104 (Park Equipment) and Water and Sewer Utility Fund - Operating Transfers-Out to Golf Course Funds - Operating Transfers- In. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3887 An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section 1 -4102 Comprehensive Plan of Title I (Administrative) of City Code relating to fees and Zoning Map Fees for Comprehensive Plan Compendium and Zoning Maps. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3888 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of Donnelly Rezone property located at 636 Shattuck Avenue South from Residence District (R-4) to Business District (B-1 ) (Donnelly Rezone, R-098-84) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance 13889 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification Crown Pointe of property located between Monroe Avenue NE and Union Avenue Limited Rezone NE between the 700 block of NE 4th Street from Business District (B-l ) to Residence District (R-3) (Crown Pointe Limited, R-067-84) . Responding to Council inquiry from 1/28/85, Mayor Shinpoch indicated that site plans submitted Renton City Council 2/4/85 ?age five Ordinances and Resolutions continued Crown Pcinte for the development reflect a distance of 175 feet from the Ltd. Rezone the centerline of the right-of-way of NE 4th Street to the continued proposed commercial structures. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke, clarification was provided that the rezone was conditioned upon site plan approval . Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following ordinance for first reading: LID 330 An ordinance was read ordering the widening of the roadway to 56 feet curb to curb, construction and installation of curbs and gutters, sidewalks, storm drains, water lines, street lights, traffic control and other necessary appurtenances in the vicinity of SW Grady Way from Lind Avenue SW west to the Grady Way Bridge, Renton, all in accordance with Resolution No. 2584 of the City Council of Renton, establishing Local Improvement District No. 330: providing assessments upon property in said district , payable by the mode of "payment of bonds," or "notes" in lieu thereof as determined by the issuance and sale of Local Improvement District warrants redeemable in cash and local improvement bonds or notes LID #330) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Stredicke commended the Administration for quick Bronson Way action on complaints regarding the lane marking buttons on Lane Buttons Bronson Way. Buttons were removed last week. ADMINISTRATIVE Responding to Council inquiry of 1/28/85 regarding compliance REPORT of utility companies to ramp-down charges, Mayor Shinpoch Ramp Dovn of referenced letter from Finance Director Michael Mulcahy which Utility Charges provides assurance that all three utilities have properly exercised their obligations to enact the City' s rate changes. Wiley Pcst/ A memorial celebration commemorating the last flight 50 years Will Rocers ago of Wiley Post and Will Rogers will be held on August 7, Memorial 1985, at Kiwanis Bicentennial Park (Renton Airport Park) . Celebration Council members will be invited to participate in the event , sponsored by private agencies and businesses. Councilman Hughes recalled that he and Councilman Clymer were present for the take-off, and were permitted free admission into the Fey Theater to view themselves on the newsreel . Golf CoLrse Council members were commended for unanimous vote on the fund transfer for golf course operation. Mayor Shinpoch advised that as a result of that action , purchase of the golf course property is official . AUDIENCE COMMENT Judy Hastings, P.O. Box 2092, Renton, Puget Power Consumer Puget Pcwer Panel member, asked for direction in obtaining public input Consumer Panel on proposed panel recommendations regarding customer service, communication with customers, and economic development prior to submission to Puget Power in June. Mayor Shinpoch felt that a brief presentation could be made to Council at a regular meeting, which would allow them the opportunity to respond on behalf of the citizens they represent. ADJOURNPENT MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL STAND ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 9:20 p.m. 27- MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT FEBRUARY 4, 1985 ORDINANCES The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Appropriation and Transfer of Funds to Golf Course Fund Modifying Fees for Comprehensive Plan Compendium and Zoning Maps Donnelly Rezone, R-098-84 (from R-4 to B-1 - 636 Shattuck Ave. So.) Crown Pointe Partnership Rezone, R-067-84 (from B-1 to R-3 - Between Monroe Ave NE and Union Ave NE near the 3700 block of NE 4th St) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading: Ordinance Ordering Construction of LID #330 (SW Grady Way from Lind Ave SW to Longacres Drive SW) APPOINTMENT TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS AND AFFAIRS COMMISSION (Referred 1-28-85) The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Ms. Sally Carlson for a term to expire April 25, 1987. Ea er,i n C. Thomas Trimm Rob Hughes • Renton City Council 1/28/85 Page seven Old Business continued Fancher Flyways Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chairman Mathews presented East Side Air a report regarding Fancher Flyways, Inc. East Side Air Park Park Lease Lease, LAG 07-79. The lease contains a stipulation that LAG 07-79 paving and landscaping are to be accomplished by the lessee. Because after four years, these improvements remain to be installed, the Committee recommends the following action be taken to enforce compliance with lease requirements: 1) Public Works shall prepare plans and specifications for paving, related drainage adjustments and landscaping. Effects of East Perimeter Road construction on the drainage patterns shall be investigated. 2) Fancher Flyways shall post a bond covering the estimated cost of this engineering work and reimburse the City for engineering costs. 3) Plans and specifications shall be presented to the Aviation Committee within 30 days (February 22, 1985) . 4) Construction shall be completed within ensuing 60 day period. 5) Failure of Fancher Flyways to meet these conditions will result in lease LAG 07-79 being declared in default. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Discussion indicated that on- going problems with this lessee for many years necessitated the recommended action. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance for second & final reading: Ordinance #3885 An ordinance was read annexing certain territory located on- Squire the north side of SE 200th Street approximately one-half mile Annexation east of Talbot Road South to the City of Renton; Squire Annexation. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Golf Course An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and transfer Fund Transfer of funds to the golf course fund to provide for general operation in the total amount of $492,428.00 from Unanticipated Revenues: Golf Course Green Fees, Investment Interest, Concessions; and Contingency Fund - Operating Transfers-Out, Cumulative Reserve Fund #2104 (Park Equipment) and Water & Sewer Utility Fund - Operating Transfers-Out to Golf Course Funds - Operating Transfers- In. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. City Attorney Warren reported that the second draft purchase and sales agreement will be presented to owners tomorrow with anticipation of finalizing the transaction within two to three weeks. CARRIED. Comp Plan and An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section 1-4102 of Zoning Map Fees Title I (Administrative) of City Code relating to fees for Comprehensive Plan Compendium and Zoning Maps. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Donnelly Rezone An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located at 636 Shattuck Avenue South from Residence District (R-4) to Business District (B-1 ) (Donnelly Rezone, R-098-84) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Councilwoman Mathews requested that agenda bill reflect referral of all rezones to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Crown Pointe An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of Ltd. Rezone property located between Monroe Avenue NE and Union Avenue NE between the 3700 block of NE 4th Street from Business District (B-1 ) to Residence District (R-3) (Crown Pointe Ltd. , R-067-84) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JANUARY 28, 1985 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: Squire Annexation (north side of SE 200th St. approximately 1/2 mile east of Talbot Road S) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Appropriation and Transfer of Funds to Golf Course Fund Modifying Fees for Comprehensive Plan Compendium and Zoning Maps Donnelly Rezone, R-098-84 (from R-4 to B-1 - 636 Shattuck Ave. So.) Crown Pointe Partnership Rezone, R-067-84 (from B-1 to R-3 - Between Monroe Ave NE and Union Ave NE near the 3700 block of NE 4 t h St) SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM (Referred 1-21-85) Upon advice from the City Attorney, the Ways and Means Committee recommends that no legislation is required to amend the Shoreline Master Program. The amendment requires approval by the City Council . APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 4576 through No. 4862 in the amount of $769,992.04. Earl Clymer, C irman Thomas Trimm n Rob Hughes Renton City Council 1/28/85 Page eight Ordinances and Resolutions continued Shoreline Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Master Program regarding the Shoreline Master Program referred on 1/21/85. Upon advice from the City Attorney, the Ways and Means Committee recommended that no legislation is required to amend the Shoreline Master Program. The amendment requires approval by the City Council . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, THIS SUBJECT BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke questioned delay in revising the Shoreline Master Program to comply with State DOE requirements, noting notification by that agency to City last fall . Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 4576 through 4862 in the amount of 5769,992.04, having received departmental certification that merchandise and/or services have been received/rendered. Vouchers 4567 through 4575 machine voided. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Reed questioned whether utility tax reductions Utility Tax are being monitored for compliance. Mayor Shinpoch indicated she will review the matter with Finance Director Mulcahy. Dochnahl Noting that the 75% petition for the Dochnahl Annexation has Annexation already been filed with the City, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, Public Hearing SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ACCEPT AND CERTIFY THE 75% PETITION FOR THE DOCHNAHL ANNEXATION, AND CITY CLERK SET PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. (See earlier action.) Crown Pointe Councilman Stredicke requested the Administration to provide Development a report indicating the setback from the centerline of NE 4th Setback Street to the Crown Pointe Limited Rezone property, located between Monroe and Union Avenue NE. Annexation MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, THAT THE Policy RESOLUTION OUTLINING CITY ANNEXATION POLICIES BE REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR LEGAL CLARIFICATION OF LANGUAGE. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch reported that efforts by Traffic Engineering REPORT to improve traffic flow along Bronson Way by installation Bronson Way of lane marking buttons for channelization have not been Buttons successful . The buttons will be removed to allow vehicles to travel straight through the intersection at Park/N. 1st. Hughes Mayor Shinpoch relayed thanks from Fire Department officials Thanked to Councilman Hughes for use of his 6th floor City Hall office window to monitor a two-engine aircraft in distress. Assembly of A proposal was made in December to the City for purchase of the God Church Assembly of God Church located at the corner of Hardie and Offered for Taylor NW in Skyway for possible use as a community center. Sale Following review of the proposal , the Park and Building Departments cannot recommend purchase of the facility due to asking price, need for extensive remodeling, and congested parking area. AUDIENCE COMMENT Judy Hastings, 14621 SE 138th Place, felt that non-resident Library Policies library users should have equal service as residents if they pay required fee. She indicated that the courtesy card available to her as a non-resident owning property in Renton does not meet her needs since it must remain on file at the main library and cannot be carried on her person. Mayor Shinpoch indicated that Mrs. Hastings concerns and suggestions for improved service should be directed to the Library Board as the City Council does not have jurisdiction in this matter. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 10:45 p.m. MAXI E E. MOTOR, City C erk Renton City Council 1/21/85 Page three Consent Agenda continued Crown Pointe Hearing Examiner recommended approval with restrictive covenants Partnersh a_ of Crown Pointe Limited Partnership Rezone Request, File No. Rezone R-067-84, for +8.0 acres of property located between Monroe R-067-84 Avenue NE and Union Avenue NE on the north side of NE 4th Street , from B-1 , Business, to R-3, Multifamily Residential Zone. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. BENAIR Lease Public Works (Airport) Department submitted BENAIR Aviation Revision request to lease additional property east of blast fence adjacent LAG 004-84 to main entry of Renton Municipal Airport (LAG 004-84) . Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. Six Year Public Works/Traffic Engineering Department requested public Transportation hearing to amend 1985-1990 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Improvement Program by adding N. 3rd Street/Park Avenue N. and N. 4th Program Amendment Street and Park Avenue N. in order to qualify for Federal 1985-1990 funds for the projects. Set public hearing for 2/11/84. Consent Agenda MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY TRIMM, ITEM 6.f. , PLANNING COMMISSION Amended REAPPOINTMENT, BE REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. Consent Agenda MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED Approved BE APPROVED. CARRIED. Item 6.f. Mayor Shinpoch reappointed Mr. Robert Patterson, 310 Bronson Planning Way NE, to the Planning Commission for a three-year term Commission effective to January 31 , 1988; Mr. Patterson has served on Reappointment the Commission since 1982. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAYOR'S REAPPOINTMENT. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Letter was read from Wallace R. Wilson, Ph.D. , Pastor of Porno Movies Highlands Community Church, commending Mayor Shinpoch and members of the City Council for deciding to take the Forbes porno case to the U.S. Supreme Court since the case could have considerable significance and positive effect on a national basis. OLD BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke presented Planning and a report regarding the Fence and Hedge Regulations, referred on and Development 10/15/84. Following considerable review and discussion on all Committee facets of the ordinance, the Committee concluded that it is in Fence and Hedge the best interest of the general public to continue to regulate Regulations fences and hedges. However due to concerns regarding the following, revisions to the ordinance are needed: 1 ) Intent ; 2) Definitions; 3) Standards which would allow staff to evaluate and approve special circumstances or conditions. Submission of this information to the Committee is anticipated within the next three weeks. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Renton Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke presented Environmental a report regarding State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Ordinance Policies and Procedures of the Renton Environmental Ordinance. Adoption of the proposed ordinance is required to establish local authority over certain elements of the environmental review process. Other elements of the ordinance are mandated by State rules. The Committee recommended that a public hearing be set for February 4, 1985, to receive public comment on the proposed Renton Environmental Ordinance as revised by the Committee, and the ordinance be referred to the full City Council for consideration and adoption. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Traffic Councilman Stredicke thanked the Administration for correcting Modification a problem with mandatory stop at intersection of Sunset Blvd. NE and N. 3rd Street; however, he complained about recently installed lane-marking buttons on Bronson Way, which are either ignored or cause confusion to drivers. Mayor Shinpoch indicated Traffic Engineering staff is reevaluating the markings due to receipt of numerous complaints. For. Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # (,. AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING o z SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./C)mm. Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of January 21 , 1985 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Fred J . Kaufman Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Crown Pointe Limited Partnership Consent Rezone: R-067-84 Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A.see lile Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) Project approved with recommended conditions . Filing of Restrictive Covenants before Council final action. Covenants attached. PARTIES OF RECOFD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: John Phillips 20001 Wes _ern Ave. Suite #555 Seattle, 4a. 98121 SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 29th day of November 1984, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. C SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this q day of 1 ? Hire-rn,Gfir„ , 1984. 6,c) ( 2_, c_6•Z Notar Publj.c47 an For the State of Washington, residing atyJ therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: R-067-84 - CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) 1146Z CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 13, 1984 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL_ CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in ‘iihich they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing E xaminer. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT - CITY OF RENTON Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an auxiliary pai king lot containing four (4) parking stalls, file SA-103-84; property located in Philip Arnold Park at 720 Jones Avenue South. CENTRON CORPORATION (TERRACE APARTMENTS) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of 264 apartments on an 8.4 acre site, file SA-099-84; located between N.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th Street and west of Edmonds Avenue N.E., if extended. CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application to rezone approximately 8.0 acres of property from B-1 to R-3 to allow construction of approximately 200 multi-family dwelling units, file R-067-84; located approximately 150 feet north of N.E. 4th Street, between Monroe Avenue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E., between the 3700 and 3800 block of N.E. 4th Street. 1086Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 13, 1984 APPLICANT: CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FILE NUMBER: R-067-84 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval to rezone approximately ±8.0 acres of property from B-1 , Business Use, to R-3, Residential-Multiple Family, for the purpose of con;tructing a multi-family project of approximately 200 dwelling units. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1.Owner of Record: Crown Pointe Limited Partnership 2.Applicant: Crown Pointe Limited Partnership 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) Between Monroe Avenue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E. between the 3700 and 3800 block of N.E. 4th Street. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department. 5. Size of Property: 8 acres 6. Access: N.E. 4th Street 7. Existing Zoning: B-1, Business Use 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use; R-3, Residential Multiple Family; B-1, Business Use; and T, Trailer. 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan:Medium Density Multi-Family; Commercial; and Greenbelt. 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on November 2, 1984, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by city ordinance on November 2, 1984. C. HIS TORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City of Renton by Ordinance #1480 which became effective April 29, 1954. Upon Annexation the subject property was zoned GS--1. ThE. property was rezoned to B-1, Business Use by Ordinance #1510 of March 8, 1955. A special permit was later applied for in April 17, 1979 to allow self-service sto-age units in a proposed Business Park on the site. The special permit SP-338-79) was approved by the City Council on July 2, 1979. This approval expired July 2, 1981. PRELIMINARY REPORT 1 u 1HE HEARING EXAMINER CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: R-067-84 SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 P4GE 2 D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1.Topography: The subject site has variable topography. A depression with steep slopes extends from the southwest portion of the site to the northern portion of the site. 2. Soils: Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC), 6 to 15% slopes. Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, berries, row crops and for urban development. 3. Vegetation: The subject site consists of a stand of Douglas fir, shrubs and grasses. 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: Water was not observed on the site during a field visit. 6. Land Use: The subject property is currently undeveloped. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The area surrounding the subject site consists of vacant property to the north; commercial and retail uses to the east; multiple family uses to the south; and a mobile home park to the west. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: A 12-inch water line extends along N.E. 4th Street near the subject property. b. Sewer: An 8-inch sanitary sewer line extends along N.E. 4th Street near the subject site. c. Storm Water Drainage: Flows to the southwest and eventually to the Cedar River. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3.Transit: METRO Transit Routes 107, 111, and 110 operate along N.E. 4th Street near the subject site. 4.Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Honey Dew Elementary School is located approximately 1/2 mile to the northeast of the site. b. Middle Schools: McKnight Middle School is located approximately 1.2 miles northwest of the site. c. High Schools: Hazen High School is located approximately 1.2 miles to the northeast of the site. 5. Recreation: The Kiwanis Park is located a little over a mile north of the subject property. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1.Section 4-711, Business District (B-1). 2.Section 4-709A. Residential District (R-3). H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1.Northeast Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1983, p. 40-45. 2. Residential Goals and Objectives, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1983, p. 14-16. 3. Section 4-3014(C), Change of Zone Classification (Rezone). PRELIMINARY REPORT TU I HE HEARING EXAMINER CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: R-067-84 SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 3 IM3ACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems: The proposed rezone does not effect the natural systems but development of the proposed project will disturb soils and vegetation and change storm water runoff characteristics. Proper development techniques will mitigate any negative impacts of site development. 2. Population/Employment: The population of the area surrounding the subject is expected to increase by 500 persons (200 dwelling units x 2.5 persons/dwelling unit). 3. Schools: The proposed multi-family project will add approximately 50 students to the school system. 4. Social: Minor. 5.Traffic: Development of the proposed project is expected to add approximately 1080 trips to N.E. 4th Street (200 dwelling units x 5.4 trips/dwelling unit). J. EN JIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Ens ironmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21 C, a final declaration of nor-significance was issued on August 22, 1984, by the Environmental Review Committee. The Committee imposed conditions for the project which are discussed below in the staff analysis section. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1.City of Renton Building & Zoning Department. 2.City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division. 5. City of Renton Police Department. 6. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 7. City of Renton Policy Development Department. 8. City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department. L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1.The applicant is seeking a rezone of ±8.0 acres of property from B-1 Business Use) to R-3 (Multiple Family Residential). This will allow the construction of 198 multiple family residential dwelling units. The property is located on approximately 150 feet north of N.E. 4th Street between Monroe Avenue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E. 2.The applicant is seeking a down zoning request to allow construction of multiple family residential dwelling units because amendments in 1982 to the B-1 zone specifically prohibited multiple family units unless they were above the first story. 3. 1 he Environmental Review Committee issued a declaration of non-significance with conditions. This was appealed and eventually remanded by the Land Use Hearing Examiner to the ERC. The ERC issued an amended decision on October 17, 1984, with the appeal period expiring on November 12, 1984. An amended final declaration of non-significance was issued with the following four conditions and two informational notes: The western 30 feet of the subject site shall be dedicated for the extension of Queen Avenue N.E. The eastern access onto N.E. 4th Street shall be eliminated when Queen Avenue N.E. is extended to N.E. 4th Street. PRELIMINARY REPORT T , , HE HEARING EXAMINER CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: R-067-84 SE TEMBER 18, 1984 PA E4 At least 30 feet of the central entrance road shall be a grade with N.E. 4th Street to allow proper sight distance to the east. Crowne Pointe Limited Partnership shall participate in the signal improvement cost for the intersection of N.E. 3rd Street and Edmonds Avenue N.E. The assessment for the amount shall be $3,024 and due upon issuance of the building permit. Informational Notes: Upon issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall construct the half-street of Queen Avenue N.E. with at least 22 feet of paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, etc., per approval of the Public Works Department. RMC 4-103(A)(1)] The site plan submitted to the Committee on August 22, 1984, is not approved as presented. The plan does not meet Fire Department access requirements. Three of the four environmental conditions imposed on the project deal specifically with access. All of the departments expressed primary concern over safe, efficient access to the site. 4.The Land Use Hearing Examiner must review four specific criteria under Section 4-3014(C) to determine that the circumstances surrounding the rezone request are adequate to recommend approval of the reclassification. The following evidence clearly demonstrates the rezone request is appropriate with conditions. a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. The subject site was rezoned under Ordinance #1510 in 1955. Therefore, it would comply with the criteria that the site has not been considered for rezoning since the land use analyses in the 1965 Comprehensive Plan and the 1981 Northeast Renton Plan. b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. The proposed rezone is not in the strictest compliance with the land use designation of Medium Density Multiple Family, Commercial, and Greenbelt for the subject site. The proposal generally complies with these land use designations and is specifically supported by policies under the residential housing density goals on pages 14-15. Concerns for adequate access for emergency and service equipment is stressed along with the fact that access, utilities and open space should be available. Areas of high residential density should be geographically concentrated and not spread indiscriminately. Also multiple family areas should be near a full compliment of urban utilities and community facilities including commercial shopping and employment centers. These policies support the concept or rezoning the property. PRELIMINARY REPORT IL i -IE HEARIN`.G EXAMINER CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: R-067-84 SEPTEMEER 18, 1984 PAGE 5 On pages 16-17 under the Commercial Objectives, we can see that development of the site into a commercial project which is also suggested by the Comprehensive Plan would not be as appropriate. These policies specifically elude to the need that any commercial area be located to minimize travel and congestion, and promote safety. They further state that commercial areas should not be located near facialities that require high degree of safety and traffic control. N.E. 4th Street is such a high volume traffic corridor that probable signalization would have to occur to allow access to a large commercial facility constructed on this 8 acre site. Office use of the subject site would increase traffic levels above the proposed residential function by approximately two times. Commercial uses could range from anywhere from three to five times as much traffic volume thus creating major left turn movements off of the subject site. In addition, the existing B-1 zoning would allow continuation of the strip commercial that is being developed along N.E. 4th Street. The rezone request will help break that trend and will allow the multiple family residential uses to act as a buffer between the single family areas to the north and the commercial areas to the south. In addition, the implementing policies of the Northeast Renton Comprehensive Plan (pages 40-45) specifically point to the critical nature of the N.E. 4th Street corridor and the fact that all commercial areas should be located within shopping centers or other sizeable complexes. Both the Bennett Multi-Vest rezone and the GM Properties rezone in 1981, argued that shopping centers could not be economically constructed in this area unless they actually fronted upon major arterials and were over ten acres in size. This would suggest that this 8 acre parcel is not immediately commercially developable because of its location and its size. In conclusion, the fact that the property has remained zoned B-1 fbr approximately 30 years suggest that it was inappropriately zoned at the time of original consideration in 1955. Utilities, streets, all of the necessary urban improvements were far away from the property in 1955. The current market demand has dictated a different direction for the use of this property and now, because of limited access, the request is more appropriate. c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. Since the land use analysis in 1981 and the original zoning of the property in 1955, other rezones in the area have prompted a shift of the commercial area from the subject site to more centralized locations immediately adjacent to the intersections of two major arterials farther to the east. Extensions of water, sewer, and street improvements to this area since 1955, have greatly changed the physical circumstances affecting the subject site. In addition, the fact that two parcels have been subdivided off of the front portion of the property along N.E. 4th Street thus limiting access to the subject site support the need for a rezoning to reduce the intensity of the land use upon the site. In fact, the 1981 amendment to the Comprehensive Plan suggests a change in the land use classification which partially supports the project proposal. The majority of the site is designated Medium Density Multiple Family and Greenbelt. PRELIMINARY REPORT Tu 1 HE HEARING EXAMINER CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: R-067-84 SE TEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 6 d. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of timeliness. The last criteria that the Hearing Examiner evaluates is the ques ion of timeliness. The proposal seems to be timely in that it is now a inf ill project instead of a major expansion of a commercial zone as it was originally proposed in 1955. Public utilities are available and modifications to the street design have been approved in the formation of an LID. 5.The Hearing Examiner also must consider the "public interest" involved in rezoning property. In most cases, rezoning to an upward classification is requested. In this case because of specific use contemplated by the developer, it is in conflict with the newely adopted 1982, B-1 (Business Use) zoning classification which restricts residential uses. The applicant has sought the rezone downward. Most arguments could be brought forth that rezoning the subject site downward decreases the environmental consequences from the development of the property. In this case, the Land Use Hearing Examiner must weigh the merits of whether the limited access is appropriate for any development on the subject property. If he finds the access is so severely limited that it must be improved before any development occurs on the property, then he should recommend to the City Council approval subject to conditions. The subject site is accessed by two basic pipestem roads that converge to one central location in the project development. The Fire Department has stated that the specific design is not acceptable because it does not meet the intent of the Fire Code and the Environmental Review Committee has so informed the applicants as part of the environmental declaration. The project, in some instances, is similar to the Herbert Mull Rezone R-412-79) where access was a severe problem. In that case, a development of approximately 14 units would utilize one access road. In this case, two access roads will serve approximtely 200 units. 6. Various City department have reviewed the subject proposal. Police and Utility Engineering approved the project only for the rezone application, while Policy Development, Building and Zoning, and Traffic Engineering approved the project with conditions. The conditions of approval and comments by the various departments are as follows: Engineering: a. Provide detail storm and utility plans including supporting calculations. b. Storm drainage to be designed on a 5-year storm/25 storage. Also use of a recharge system where feasible will be expected. c. Possible through street required. Building Division: a. Twenty-five percent maximum paving of Greenbelt. (This has been modified by Ordinance #3849 effective November 11, 1984.) Traffic Engineering: a. Participate in LID for N.E. 4th Street roadway widening. b. Coordination of off-site improvements with the proposed roadway widening of N.E. 4th Street. Coordination to include street lightin. Plans to be provided. c. Underground all overhead electrical and/or communication lines abutting property on N.E. 4th Street. Provide confirmation. d. Driveways to be thirty feet in width. PRELIMINARY REPORT IL , ,HE HEARING EXAMINLR CROWN F'OINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: R-067-84 SEPTEMEER 18, 1984 PAGE 7 e. Signing provisions for no left turn movements from entrances until left turning facilities are provided on N.E. 4th Street. f. Percentage assessment for traffic signal at N.E. 3rd Street and Edmonds Avenue N.E. ($3024). Policy Development: a. Proposed rezone is in conformance with Comprehensive Plan. b. The Greenbelt powerline easements can only be used for parking if 50% of the area is retained in open space without impervious surface. Applicant should provide information to this effect or revised site plan. c. Also Queen Avenue will provide the primary future access to the site and site plan will need to be revised accordingly. Therefore, site plan approval should be a condition of the rezone. Fire Prevention Bureau: a. Access roadways required to be extended to within 150 feet of the ground floor of all buildings. b. Second means of access required to be provided to the site. Access depicted is not approved. c. All deadend roads of excess of 150 feet to be provided with appropriate turnaround. d. All buildings in excess of 12,000 square feet required to be protected with fire sprinklers. e. Fire alarm system approved by the Fire Department tied to approved central station monitoring office required. f. Water plans required to provide fire flow approved by Fire Department. Utilities Engineering: a. Latecomer's agreement for water (W-238) amount: $6.7471 per front foot on N.E. 4th Street. b. Latecomer's agreement for sewer: none. c. System development charge water - $175.00 per unit. System development charge sewer - $175.00 per unit. d. Need approved water plans. e. Need approved sewer plans. f. Need approved fire hydrant locations by Fire Department. g. Require fire flow analysis. h. Water and sewer extension required. 7.The City of Renton has recently has inacted a detailed zoning classification for the preservation of Greenbelts. The Comprehensive Plan had suggestive language in it with a maximum 25% developable. The Greenbelt Ordinance itself follows this basic intent, but allows flexibility based on the underlying function of the greenbelt. In this specific case, it appears that under utility easements adjacent to property zoned R-3 or R-4, which this will be the future case, that 50% of the area can be utilized for parking. (Ref: Ordinance #3849 effective November 11, 1984) The site plan, as presented, was specifically rejected by the Environmental Review Committee because it does not meet either the intent of the Greenbelt Ordinance or the specific fire code requirements for access and circulation. The eastermost access on to N.E. 4th street is at a very bad location for sight distance and the ERC has specifically required that the access be eliminated with the construction of Queen Avenue N.E. in the future. The Examiner can, under public interest, require the extension of that right-of-way as part of the rezone. The Examiner specifically in the environmental considerations eliminated and remanded that proviso to the Environmental Review Committee. However, the scope of the "public interest" is much greater than whether there are substantial environmental impacts. (In the future, the Environmental Review Committee will be making specific recommendation to the Hearing Examiner and the City Council for the decision-makers to take specific action on. However, in this case, the item was processed under the old procedure because it was initially reviewed through the environmental process prior to October 1, 1981.) PRELIMINARY REPORT 1 u 1 HE HEARING EXAMINER CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: R-067-84 SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 8 The Land Use Examiner must determine now whether the access is adequate based upon the "public interest." The various departments have commented that adequate access is appropriate only is Queen Avenue is constructed, plus it meets a public goal of providing circulation to the general neighborhood as stated in the Comprehensive Plan. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the rezone request, file R-067-84, be recommended to the City Council for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Site plan approval. 2. Construction of Queen Avenue N.E. from N.E. 4th Street to the southern property line on the subject site at the time the City acquires the appropriate right-of-way. 1 ,___,_, __,,,R.3----, Ie.• .• ii R-3 1III i B-1 B- 1 1 R 3 B-, m Of.A;I%ru.. I I IJLI i hr___ lil; GREENIWpOD 1 r ' .1E rE.RY - , I t 0_i 7 R-3 i t+t, R- C D I it __. - I' .-1.4' t - R-1 J1 1 1'.':j'' I I 11•I I 11•{' . 1 C. • 11 I 1 y I I I w - yy v- • z. 1 1 I dd •` PaT c 1' IJ•b rs.. 1. J I•+ _ 1 I 11 1 c.- ';'. ,/ ,6 i'1 0:" c.\7 •8 J Q,,.VO4 e ` r 411 t rn? • •)a' a•` X:.'/.. 1\ 4/ jam 7 I zoto l is CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP R-067-84 APPLICANT CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TOTAL AREA - 3ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 4TH STREET EXISTING ZONING B-1, BUSINESS USE EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE REZONE TO ALLOW A MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT OF APPROX. 200 UNITS. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL & GREENBELT COMMENTS J | i r Sa) v N s..' f‘ _ ice, 11, O ( 5 > ' l:• tiar. ....., r' w3> r r.... r f•.. a. .... I 1l f 1 _ - 1 I' I Ki ,. T fQ' a Q ,, i'\\` El o imeir f f / O 1r, Too orooflo NI fort of Ito so. IVO foot Of 04 soot hell g' III ! .. 1' 111I Will . I e. . 1 , 1.. OIL :. .. jidlia7ljijllgIr; 1 i ( ' 4 Oa* ... a. atarrir Aix Cs, ilk , _, 1 s. 1 • / 11r._ vil ftl• 111. 110 ' I ' 1 i 7 /(,/,..' Ogle ODOMON. 41111i IIT ': Ililllll, 21 T see Rlinci li --: 41 j I I iii/ I I i I I • • 00 , MA _ 7 1 1 7 1411' ill ViGMITV MN C.._ W. L) Ili r 1 I . ' '\ 1 '• l Yl• l- I I I n 1: Eid '_ 1 i 1 lei I i i . tii4 x w i - 4 1 I / I I , 1 / yr NL. 4- 0 STRLLTdr - uH. h.-— U REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :1 .'k y 1 dr e El APPROVED l2J APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS LI NOT APPROVED Profabet re Zone- is a;. eays 4 1-w.a-•,c4 du r i Fit., IQ_ t,,ef„,j,,,e_bt- rows/110.e edistene4...1" Cal40% COAL 17 LE 1,44,1 ,4r pAikkelLa i 4 So % 4 ft. Mick us. ,Lt.tL B 4._ ( fro ce. (w i Itivo&a - j bvio eY ious Surface A Iic.61-4- SI.ad pvvvride in6r,l,+a4'a,o. 'tb fita eA et 4ls® ck. re l.^a 44 a mud • o ftt. si;k 44 ,tie pia-. Loaf Kea 4 L / ' at 0.e„cerwt,'veil , it ere 1Ae plo,., apro^ SAS l A. cc: .d,44•a. o r Z rv DATE ; • l 907 , SIGMA URE OF DI ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RPVIAIAN 5/19a2 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 4../,4,-,-- APPROVED I ( APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED I, AIX- DATE : 6 -0' 8/ SIGNATURE OF DIR,' TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : F)LD `, I ( APPROVED 7 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS f ( NOT APPROVED G / c_7/ 6._; y,,,94._2( y- 2 di ,c/c) 6 -C, Ve.J2,6-7( 6.„e—,/, 2,_„.,C ., , DATE : r----fY- SIGNATURE 0,--- RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : l r// /, APPROVED n A. . .:OVED WITH CONDITIONS lJ NOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SIIIECT II J'A1/4 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER MS W_23q' Z #4 At7/ eA X.A. Dk/II,E¢1 LATE CRIERS AGREEMENT • SEWER ES - El &Se-A/O , . / SYSTEM OEVIL$PIIENT AARIE • MATER y is 1/757' pe ie,d-t f 4fP,e0 E:b. IL-Die fEzoiVE SYSTEM IVELIPIENT CRAM - SEVER y -5- , /9s H y rri O .t y/ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER No SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA MICE SEWER NO iv.; -() 4- ivi Ye-- 67 .tS/"-g APPROVED WATER PLAN yA-s APPROVED SEWER MI 1/ 6 k` APPROVED FIRE NYNRAIT L l IV FIRE DEPT. y/s' C FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS 1 `y 1 4) DATE : D d \ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE y$ REVISION 5 Form 1P_ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 3 6--.---41-4.-----1 E APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ElNOT APPROVED Pro,4- ai d-,( S74,rt..,- f T/tt j , Q L+,-C/ ,a S-ye,f' S-i-rr w`• a,.-4.-- Sy/v S 4- may S'e- . /4 1-c"' t A- fG sy l 4//z/4/ Sl TL S r r(1 '1 DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 1' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : "T/;,¢P/=ic j ,N-Fi 1NG 0 APPROVED PPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED P3r/ , 'e ;/7 -,Z / .e Ih LIl7 14, NE 4 t S-t; eracl . . Lk: ;Jcttt ki t d ICI c Q L A; 6,,,,~d , I1 a_ Lo iv II/ Cticde tvec - l-LYc cl' 11 d a-c yU/-k--4 TO Utic,#(.te..,i E1«+ 'c_ r r - c1 p Y G'1 t , ``I E ( S / ' P '"'.mod' `-'''I *n- 4.r- JI!' -?- t' (J,SrvbS 1- ,' eee 1r / 1 J I) U','f••.Q e2 l i/i 74C., f'.'—t /9Yc'L%CA el s-7 V C 7 L Sr Vve-Ce:^, , JJ DATE : C y i l f)s=; M SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AU,YFiORIZED REPRESENTATIVE o. X6' p c . C t fp T1rdt7/; ' f Lcs 1 1,V3' Y CE bl r c j E.>»> ( REVISION 5/1982 v C. r J c I i R!L REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVT"TON : Ft (Z.E APPROVED a APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 4pv®.c, ,E 7K ii1 . c / y Al TE E c o,i r A'r- £oN,O./77 o.so f O ii .,.t/ lv coM/.Ts ®, 6 - /s- 8y DATE; Z -- .5- sy SIGNA OF DI CTOF ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 8/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED ill APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS w NOT APPROVED gcs-c ,Ea 2s V ,e QLI,/2 ,n 7 exr-.4-4,b 70 4),r, 4) SO' QJ • :dE G.204)2-)19 T^Lo c'2 0, /9 L L 311/LDi;)6 S 24 ,r,/ '9 A's of-- ,ccce cs 6lJ J e.e•v 70 o i,o E o 73 7NE T -, A eC8S s ar-",ic-ir— 4 ,s N or APv/A/ , 70 .ram 7r,oc r Pf,P e,t!>"= 7"-//t 4) -- "a o d.v O . U y, ET CQ R ac 44 l jvlG0i 65 i bnCciSs o /Zi v P TEc re29 w, Tr-J icil2 SP2/i1 L k c S. ,irE ALAp- 5/S re-AA 6Ir'0 2''° , f / 7iE E g Tv,4 e Eo CA/T2a G Sra r, o- , vlvA1 ira 2> A)Go i G-EEC,),),izl-i f/ D 40''ov t' /1+/ F: - 07/7 DATE : l0- /3`a e( SIGNATURE RECTO OR A Tp--7 REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1 982 0496N FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Applicatioi No(s): R-067-84 Environme ital Checklist No.:ECF-068-84 Description of Proposal:Application to rezone approximately 8.0 acres of property from B-1 to R-3 to allow construction of approximately 200 multi-family dwelling units. Proponent: Crown Pointe Limited Partnership Location o.' Proposal: Located approximately 150 feet north of N.E. 4th Street, between Monroe Avenue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E., between the 3700 and 3800 block of N.E. 4th Street. Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on June 20, June 27, July 25, August 1, and August 22, 1984, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Departmen:. Oral comments were accepted from: Gene Williams, Richard Houghton, Jerry Lind Michael Parness, Robert Bergstrom, James Hanson, Ronald Nelson, James Matthew, aid Roger Blaylock. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-068-8f are the following: 1. Envi-onmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Colin Quinn, dated May 29, 1984. 2.Applications: Rezone (R-067-84). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities Engi leering Division, and the Police Department. 4. Recc mmendations for a declaration of significance: Fire Prevention Bureau. 5. Recommendation for more information: Policy Development Department. Acting as I he Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under ROW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject rezone will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties and shall be subject to the following conditions being complied with: 1.The .western thirty (30) feet width of the subject property shall be dedicated to the City of Renton for the future half-street alignment of Queen Avenue N.E. Acgi isition and dedication of said width from the south property line to N.E. 4th Street shall also be done to complete this alignment. 2. Crov'ne Pointe Limited Partnership shall participate in the signal improvement cost for the intersection of N.E. 3rd Street and Edmonds Avenue N.E. The asse<,sment amount shall be $3,024.00 and be due upon the issuance of a building perry it. FINAL DECLARATION OF JN-SIGNIFICANCE CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: ECF-068-84, R-067-84 AUGUST 27, 1984 PAGE 2 INFORMATION: 1. Upon issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall construct the half street of Queen Avenue N.E. with at least 22 feet of paving, curbs, gutter, sidewalk, etc. per approval of the Public Works Department. 2. The site plan submitted to the Committee on August 22, 1984, is not approved as presented. This plan does not meet the Greenbelt Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. SIGNATURES: Ronald G. Nelson Michael Pa ess Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor i- Ri6hard C. Houghton J Public Works Director PUBLISHED: AUGUST 27, 1984 APPEAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1984 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 068 - 84 APPLICATION No(s ) : R-067-84 PROPONENT: CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED• + 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVE. N.E. AND UNION AVE. N.E. : BETWEEN THE 3/00 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th STREET. SITE AREA: 8.0 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross) : N/A DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (8) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : x 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: X 3) Water & Water Courses: x 4) Plant Life: x 5) Animal Life: x 6) Noise: x 7) Light & Glare: 8) Land Use; North: VACANT East : COMMERCIAL & SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL South: MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL West: MOBILE HOME PARK Land Use Conflicts : CONFLICT WITH GREENBELT POLICY AS PROPOSED. View Obstruction: 9) Natural Resources : x 10) Risk of Upset : x 11) Population/Employment : x 12) Number of Dwellings : 200 x - 13) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 1080 TRIP ENDS Traffic Impacts: ALONG N.E. 3rd-4th STREET CORRIDOR. 14) Public Services: x 15) Energy: X 16) Utilities : X 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/History: X Signatures: Ronald G. Nelson Michael ess Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor PUBLISHED: AUGUST 27, 1984 Ri hard C. Houghto APPEAL DATE: F.PTF.MRF,R 10. 1984 Public Works Director 1147Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBL IC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMIN'=R AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON NOVEMBER 13, 1984, AT 9:00 A.N. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT - CITY OF RENTON Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an auxiliary parking lot containing four (4) parking stalls, file SA-103-84; property to sated in Philip Arnold Park at 720 Jones Avenue South. CL:NTRON CORPORATION (TERRACE APARTMENTS) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of 264 apartments on an 8.4 acre site, file SA-099-84; located between N.E. 3rd St-eet and N.E. 4th Street and west of Edmonds Avenue N.E., if extended. CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application to rezone approximately 8.0 acres of property from B-1 to R-3 to allow construction of approximately 200 multi-family dwelling units, file R-067-84; located approximately 150 feet north of N.E. 4th Street, between Monroe Avenue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E., between the 3700 an d 3800 block of N.E. 4th Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 13, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : NOVEMBER 2, 1984 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANE f TE M. SAMEK-McKAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Publi in and for the State of Washington residing in per,, on the 2nd iay of November, 1984. SIGNE - hUb art! a ifr A 0 6 7- EV Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF KING Cindy StrupL being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says thatgil.e...is the .C.b.1..eZ....Cl.e h of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, Public Notice Public Notice printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the RENTON LAND USE _. Ronald aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record HEARING EXAMINER Building and Zoning Dr Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior RENTON,WASHINGTON Published in the Daily Record Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY September 7, 1984. R9380 THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING Washington.That the annexed is a La.nd..Use. •Hearing IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RE- NTON,WASHINGTON ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: as it was published in regular issues(and - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period INC. Application to rezone 9.7 acres of property from P-1 to R-3 for a future multi- family development having approximately of one consecutive issues,commencing on the 186 housing units, file R-073-84; located along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block(current- 7.t.11.day of.......e.p c.Lbe.r 19 4 ,and ending the ly the site of Renton Golf Range). CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNER- SHIP Application to rezone approximately 8.0 day of 19 ,both dates acres of property from B-1 to R-3 to allow inclusive, and that such i ewspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- construction of approximate 200 multi- scribers during all of sad period. That the full amount of the fee family dwelling units. located i - approximately 150/1iM8 N.E. 4th 1. *Street between WOWAlrgltree N.E.and charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of S.2.7.4.0.Q which Union Avenue N.E.,between tl1e3700and has been paid in full at tilt rate of per folio of one hundred words for the • 3800 block of N.E.4th Street.first insertion and per 'olio of one hundred words for each subsequent c..._ insertion. Legal descriptions of the files rioted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. j; 1 ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE-i. SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON Chie.f...C1'erk SEPTEMBER 18, 1884,AT 9:00 A.M.TO Subscribed and sworn to b:.•fore me this....2.th day of SePte/111)e.r 19..i,!.1,. Notary Public in or the State of Was ington, CITY O: RENTON residing at Kest{King County. f p f-, 11.y n nn e d P-., Way .. it 11 \!J o Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June O C T 15 19849th, 1955. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. BUILDING!CVf iNG i tY'T. VN#87 Revised 5,82 pF R, O, flQ Og47 SEPTE40 City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON NOVEMBEF 13, 1984 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: R-067-84 X' REZONE From B-1 To R-3 SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To 1 SITE APPROVAL ri SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots I PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM GENERAL LOCATION AND/DR ADDRESS: LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4TH STREET,, BETWEEN MONROE AVE. N.E. & UNION AVE. N.E., BETWEEN THE 3700 & 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4TH STREET. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION 0 SIGNIFICANT ;! NON—SIGNIFICANT FOR i=URTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING& ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION OF 124, z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR asil 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09gr D SEP E1O P BARBARA Y. ';HINPOCH MAY0F November 1, 1984 Colin Quir n Centron 855 106th Avenue N.E., C-90001 Bellevue, IVA 98009 Re: Apr lication to rezone property from B-1 to R-3 for multifamily dwelling units, file R-C 67-84; property located 150 feet north of N.E. 4th Street between Monroe AVE nue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E., between the 3700 and 3800 block of N.E. 4th StrE>et. Dear Mr. Quinn: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on June 8, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Heari ig Examiner has been scheduled for November 13, 1984. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Lt VVVRogerJ. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:i l 1153Z OF P4,11, iOP PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C. HOUGHTON 0 DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 9A 206 235-2569 9q1. 0 BARBARA Y. S-INPOCH October 16, 1984 MAYOR MEMORANDUM CITY OF RENTON TO:ERC MEMBERS OCT 1 6 1984 FROM: Vince Lee BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Dick Houghton had recently discussed the following development projects with Mr. John Phillips (tel : 467-7766) . The following is summary of points discussed: 1 . CROWN Point - Original plan called for (2) access streets. ERC requested change - one entry to be at Queen Ave. location. Proper- ty owner at that location refuses to sell . Crown Point developer is quite prepared to commit to future construction of Queen Avenue access (and closing of one of the original two) if property can be acquired by condemnation or whatever 7.? 2. TFE TERRACE - Developer was told he had to pay 100% of cost for new signal , then Hearing Examiner ruled that only 4% of cost applied. Since signal installation would thus be deferred, developer was told that as interim measure he would have to install channelization, etc. otherwise the "right-in/right-out" traffic pattern at Edmonds would be retained. New a second application has been filed with.ERC (first one has not been cancelled) . Question: what will happen with respect to signal installation requirement and apportionment of cost, ref. second application? Don Monaghan confirms that Dick H. is of the opinion that ERC should go for signal installation by developer now. If they want latecomer' s agreement that is acceptable. VL:pmp cc: B. Bergstrom D. Monaghan G. Norris RENA" BUILDING & ZONING DEPOMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 068 - 84 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : R-067-84 IUN 1 2 1984 POLICY PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DEVELO MPNT r1cPT PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPEL FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ± 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVENUE N.E. : BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th STREET. TO : I ( PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/20 I ( ENGINEERING DIVISION 1TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7/24 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT I ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON JUNE 19, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :R'k y DeVeideht w/ APPROVE) Nj APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ell NOT APPROVED Pin o A'et VG W t C- i S sr. Car.41-r.%a-•.c t 1,,t se: 1 1k2 roweithke eallr te... ' c4.40%. a+1/ 7 6t d 4r Si, typ ft t & ea 4a AzteAA144/ a fact (w i mo wf envious suvtAc.c), l 'p'ica"1- S&dc"14( rvv-ide ih4r1,a.1'1ti• lb tLi,:J 04 Also t9u..i AI • owtl rv ick. - a d- ive rcvit. s,I c,. pl°.,,,., I°et,wI 414,' - acc id -fo # ak •o-r.d Az4t taIo-. woiaf seed 4, h 4L t €of P • itcrttoreI d1 a I 1 a pro 4+ ,s1.64 l c a df ll•, 0 YC Z esW DATE ; //D• sl i9/34 SIGNA URE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REh N BUILDING & ZONING DEF TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET E C F - 068 - 84 APPLICATION 10(S) : R-067-84 PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS NOV. 5 1,,;A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPER FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED - 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVENUE N.E. : BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th STREET. TO : n P• UBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/20 ri ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7/24 n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION X FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT B• UILDIN3 & ZONING DEPARTMENT n P• OLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT in OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JUNE 19, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Fl APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED 7' e o•i.OJT eaAW i 7 A4c.o 61,f l// c /4/24 ,.1 ' f o - ,s g 1 DATE : 4-Si- ty SIGNA OF DI CTOP r"ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE nrvesnu ti/1011.1 I REN'. ...I BUILDING & ZONING DEPAK TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET E C F - 068 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-067-84 PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPER FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ± 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVENUE N.E. : BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th STREET. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/20 El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7/24 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 111 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT 111 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I iOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JUNE 19, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : rwe. Ei APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS E NOT APPROVED itieecs-c ,e1z7 44/o- , 6Q.6, -,t3 eXT-E,c-406,77 7Z7 1.1),r-/, ,/ SO' O/G "'NE G ea,i) !, Tl..o ooz. Oi,= /9 L L. Z31)/4.D/Yc 2, 2 A-v' ,t I A is p . /2c.c.6s5 • QeJJ4,E.p l oEO 7b T/.E 5,T ,. ,a e-CESs Z''Gp-6 7 ,s A)o tT .9Piai1.d/Ed=2 , 7'0 .r3a i•r r GJ/i>' 'Pf9 e4) it__4 diG pi 6 s / ,ram X Ge's v . 17, v> Sy, ,ACT >rQ 1I ID TEG re17 LA), 774 ,ii2 Sc3eiiz J,e L &-sTN F A E-n 7-o 4/ ove:d S. ,/r E ALA/2M SyS TCA 4 I/,+'p y CAA r eA L .s7'.0 Ti v p../ .tiloit/f7"a to G e 1 G&-k31tZJJi iz En. 6, l.)/4 re-,‹ 22.441 ,41.444Wirtoiwiimmpla, 7 / I//mac c.) xtie"ioe-eatibZt9 ,may DATE : l0- /'- SIGNATURE R CTO OR A T RIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN%BUILDING & ZONING DEPAH f MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 068 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-067-84 PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPEf< FROM B-1 TO f -3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : L(CATED - 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVENUE N.E. : BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th STREET. TO : 1 PUBLIC AJORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/20 EN3INEERING DIVISION I ITR \FFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7/24 I ! UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION l l FIRE PR :VENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDINGS & ZONING DEPARTMENT V 7 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS COMMENTS OR : UGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P . M. ON JUNE 19, 1984 REVIEWING DEFARTMENT/DIVISION : d./.r- APPROVEL I ! APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS l ( NOT APPROVED DATE : 6 -a- gY SIGNATURE OF DIR TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 0731E November 29, 1984 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: Crown Pointe Limited Partnership FILE NO. R-067-84 LOCATION: Between Monroe Avenue N.E. and Union AVenue N.E. between the 3700 Block of N.E. 4th Street. SUMMAR / OF REQUEST: Approval to rezone approxinately +8.0 acres of property from B-1, Business Use, to R-3, Residential-Multiple Family, for the purpose of constructing a multi-family project of approximately 200 dwelling units. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on November 6, 1984. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on November 13, 1984, at 9:25 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting, and other documents pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Assessors Map Exhibit #3 - Site Plan Zoning Administrator, Roger Blaylock presented the staff report for the City. Mr. Blaylock proceeded stating this request could be considered as "down zoning" because the change in zoning is from B-1 to R-3. The rezone is requested because the change in the B-1 zone in 1982 required that first floor uses be commercial, and uses above that could be multiple family. In order to develop a multiple family complex only, the applicant must rezone the property into the proper classification. The property is accessed off of N.E. 4th Street at 2 points. From a land use pattern, the site is over-shadowed by a major transmis!.ion corridor which is 200 ft. wide. This corridor limits the amount of development that can be accomplished for this project. The corridor was used in the Comprehensive Plan as a point of division between commercial designations on the east and high density multiple family on the west, with the corridor designated as a greenbelt. With the R-3 designation the applicant would be permitted to build up to 200 units. Previous history of the property showed it had at one time been all one piece of property and the ots in front were sold off. That action limited the accessibility and the building potential of the property. Continuing with the review, Mr. Blaylock stated the drainage for this property has not been evaluated closely enough to determine if it would have any impact cn the Mt. Olivet Cemetery. Recreational facilities on-site should be substantial in the building permit design phase of the project. The ERC has issued a declaration of non-sign ficance with conditions which included dedication of 30 ft. for the extension of Queen Avenue N.E.; the eastern access onto N.E. 4th Street be eliminated when Queen Avenue N.E. is extended to N.E. 4th Street; at least 30 ft. of the central entrance road shall be at grade with N.E. 4th Street to allow proper sight distance to the east; and, the applican!: shall participate in the signal improvement cost for the intersection of N.E. 3rd Street and Edmonds Avenue N.E., with the fee to be paid upon the issuance of the building permit. Crown Pointe Limited Partnership R-067-84 November 29, 1984 Page 2 The Zoning Administrator discussed the two accesses to the property that converge to one point, and the fire department desire that there be two completely separate accesses for fire protection purposes. It was noted that this problem could be resolved with a redesign and separation of the accesses. A review was made of the four criteria to be considered as appropriate for this rezone request, and the traffic to be generated from this multiple family classification as compared to a commercial designation. It is believed the project is timely, especially with the formation of the LID, and by the time the project is occupied the improvements should be almost completely installed. The applicant has reduced his potential development by 35%, and the site, even with the reduction, does have an access problem. Mr. Blaylock stated the city is concerned about the area between N.E. 4th and N.E. 6th street between Monroe and Union because it is a superblock, no connecting streets. It is felt that Queen Avenue would be the best extension for a north/south street which could help the project in the future because the way it is designed, if Queen Avenue was extended it would create three accesses to the project, then the circulation and emergency access to the project would be substantially improved. With the above review, Mr. Blaylock gave a staff recommendation for approval subject to site plan approval and the construction of Queen Avenue from N.E. 4th Street to the southern property line at the time the City acquires the appropriate right-of-way. The Hearing Examiner called for testimony in support of this proposal, responding for the applicant was: John Phillips 2001 Western Avenue, Suite #555 Seattle, Washington, 98121 Mr. Phillips began by stating he felt the rezone is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, meets good zoning principles and good transition from higher density to lower density developments. This particular developer has owned this property since 1981 and has been pursuing the development of the property on a continuous basis. The developer has conducted an extensive traffic analysis and has granted easements as necessary for the LID, and had designed a 240 unit multifamily development on the property prior to the 1983 change in the B-1 zoning. The site is currently vacant except for a small shop in one corner of the property, and bisected on the south by a 200 ft. transmission easement. He reviewed the general policies of the Comprehensive Plan that he felt did or did not apply to this development, and stated he feels the buffering requirements are the most applicable to this site. He also feels this project satisfies the public utility and arterial issues addressed in the land use policies. The traffic expected to be generated because of this project is projected to increase less than 5%. The applicant does not have any objection to the development and extension of Queen Avenue North but feels they do not have the power to do it. They hope when there is other development in the area those persons will be participating in the cost of the development and extension of Queen Avenue North to N.E. 4th Street. The conditions regarding the entry and exit on N.E. 4th can be satisfied, as well as closing off the eastern access from Queen Avenue. Mr. Phillips stated he feels the site plan, as submitted, satisfies all of the requirements of the City. He said this site plan has over 50% open space, 198 units, less than 23% lot coverage, and 297 parking spaces. He said he would like to have the site plan approved now and not have to come back through the hearing process again. He requested approval of the rezone. The Hearing Examiner called for further testimony either in support of, or opposition to this proposal. There was no one else in the audience to speak, but Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator spoke suggesting a slight modification. He stated the applicant's request for R-3 over the entire property includes 3 land use classifications (High Density, Greenbelt and Commercial designations). He said they are requesting a rezone of property designated on the Comprehensive Plan as greenbelt. That should not be a precedent setting situation because they are asking for a contract that is lower than the intensity over the overall project. He requested that the Hearing Examiner take that information into consideration when rendering his decision. Mr. Blaylock also stated the environmental review process had already been undertaken when the State changed their procedures. The original declaration set out 4 conditions and it was felt that the applicant should not have the right to change any of those 4 items. Building and Zoning would have no objection to deleting the site plan criteria with the understanding that the applicant must bear the burden of proof in submitting details for the greenbelt plans and that he show all on-site recreation. It was felt the landscape should be approved by the City's Landscape Architect, which is a normal building permit criteria. He again recommended approval of the rezone request. Crown Pointe Limited Partnership R-067-84 November 29, 1984 Page 3 The Hearing Examiner called for further testimony or comments. There being no one else wishing to speak, the hearing was closed at 11:20 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Crown Pointe Limited Partnership, filed a request for approval of a reclassification of approximately 8.0 acres of property from B-1 Business/Commercial) to R-3 (Medium Density Multifamily). 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5.The subject site is located between Monroe Ave N.E. and Union Ave N.E. in the 3700 block of N.E. 4th Street. The subject site is approximately 150 feet north of N.E. 4th with access to the site via two separate dog leg drives. 6. The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1480 adopted in April of 1954.. The site was automatically zoned GS-1 upon annexation. Ordinance 1510 adopted in March of 1955 reclassified the site to B-1 it's current classification. 7. A special permit approved in 1979 to allow a self-service storage facility was never implemented, and expired. 8. A steep slope follows a depression which runs from the southwest corner of the site to the northern boundary of the site. Douglas fir, shrubs and grasses cover the subject site. 9.The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of medium density multifamily residential, greenbelt and business/commercial uses generally running from west to east, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 10. The subject site is bisected by a powerline corridor. Such corridors are generally designated for greenbelt purposes. In this location it generally separates multifamily residential use designations from the commercial designations closer to Union Ave N.E. 11. The applicant's request is predicated upon the recent change which limits residential development in B-1 zones to mixed use, in which the first floor must contain commercial uses. The site has limited frontage and therefore, limited exposure for commercial purposes. Until the change, B-1 zoned property could be used for exclusively residential purposes. 12. The subject site is a large multi-block B-1 district which extends from Monroe Ave on the west to the midway point between Union and Duvall Avenues on the east. The district also extends south of N.E. 4th Street. A small T (Mobile Home Park) district is located west of the subject site. North of the subject site is a large single family district with smaller pockets of low and medium density multifamily districts. This single family district extends to Sunset Blvd on the north. 13. An LID has been approved for N.E. 4th Street. Traffic signals and intersection improvements have been completed for several of the intersections along N.E. 4th. 14. Utility lines have been upgraded since the site was last reclassified in 1955. Crown Pointe Limited Partnership R-067-84 November 29, 1984 Page 4 15. Reclassification of the subject site is estimated to have the following impacts: Increase the area population by approximately 500 persons; increase the school age population by approximately 50 students; and increase the average daily vehicle count by approximately 1080 trips per day. The current B-1 zoning, if used for offices, would not affect current population generally or in the school system, but would generate additional vehicle loads - up to twice the amount estimated for the residential complex the R-3 zoning would permit. 16. The subject site was the object of an environmental appeal concerning access to N.E. 4th St. The applicant has agreed to dedicate property along the western boundary of the subject site for the future extension of Queen Ave N.E. both for internal circulation and access for the subject site, as well as access to northerly properties. Until access can be secured across intervening property south of the subject site, access to 4th would be via two dog leg driveways. One driveway would be more or less centrally located under the power lines, the other at the western boundary of the subject site. The easterly driveway would also serve parking needs of the development. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the three criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The requested reclassification is justified and should be approved subject to the conditions indicated below. 2. The site has not been reviewed as to the reasonableness of its zoning since 1955. Not only has the general Highlands area of the City grown since that time, but streets and intersections have been improved and widened and the subject site itself has been divided. The division resulted in a separation of the subject site from frontage on N.E. 4th. Commercial/retail viability depends to a great extent upon exposure to passing traffic, the subject site has very limited exposure. 3. By the same token, the subject site has gained some advantages from being remote from the busy arterial impacts of N.E. 4th. Residential uses become more appropriate since the site would be less noisy. Residential uses are also compatible with at least part of the Comprehensive Plan's designation of the subject site as suitable for multi-family uses. Residential use of the site would also permit a transition from the commercial activity along 4th to the single family uses north of the subject site. 4. The infra-structure of the area, sewers, water and storm drainage, would appear sufficient for the proposed level of development R-3 zoning would permit. The rezone, therefore, does not appear to burden the services of the City and in fact changes little save for eliminating the new requirement in the B-1 zone of Commercial uses on the first floor. 5. While the request appears justified the current zoning could easily accommodate an office complex. Office uses in natural settings could be a viable alternative for a site such as the subject site. The lack of frontage on a major arterial would not necessarily hinder an office complex and the 8 acre size could complement such development by permitting integration of the natural features of the site. It would also be compatible with the Comprehensive Plan, and no less so than the current request. While the traffic generation might be twice that of a built out residential complex, the peak hour would be different and the commute possibly reversed. Crown Pointe Limited Partnership R-067-84 November 29, 1984 Page 5 6. The site has some topographical constraints, as well as limitations regarding access, and a major powerline transmission corridor runs through the site. In addition, the Comprehensive Plan indicates that portions of the site should be limited in some fashion to greenbelt uses. This combination of factors would appear to favor site plan review to assure that details regarding development in and around the greenbelt is controlled; to further assure that residential uses are located suitably vis-a-vis the powerline corridor; and that access has been thoroughly reviewed by the Fire Department and the Traffic Engineering Division. Site plan review will permit a full review of the final project including detailed landscaping plans, recreational requirements, access including suitable road grades, and the welfare of the residents and the general public. Also an issue which needs to be resolved is whether the acreage under the power line, for which compensation was presumably afforded, should be utilized in density decisions. 7. Subject to the condition above and a condition to construct Queen Avenue N.E. from the southern boundary of the subject site to N.E. 4th St. when the right-of-way is acquired by the City, the City Council should approved the reclassification of the subject site. Queen Ave N.E. is necessary to provide safe access from the subject site, and unrestricted interior access for emergency vehicles. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from B-1 to R-3 subject to the execution of restrictive covenants requiring: 1. Site Plan review in a public hearing format 2. The construction of Queen Avenue N.E. from the southern boundary of the subject site to N.E. 4th Street upon acquisition of the right-of-way by the City. ORDERED THIS 29th day of November, 1984. Fred J. Kauf an Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of November, 1984 to the parties of record: John Phillips 2001 Western Avenue, Suite #555 Seattle,Washington, 98121 TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of November, 1984 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before December 13, 1984. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. Crown Pc inte Limited Partnership R-067-81 November 29, 1984 Page 6 An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appdarance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested] parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. T he Doc:rine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsiddration as well as Appeals to the City Council. Ilk ., a 12 0 cirN.. 11. a. i\\ V1\ \t`\ % 'Ii•iF - - i ,/ / I ra+, ..ra ora rra Sv \ a n i:............... rr w.,... w.a....•..... r• I 1 l`_+L - r/-1' si ' ,•` I isr. QI m•D I • _ _ 1 I,\ 0 3d W» r.:.». 0 u.r...•...w»..,w w.r..:u 1 r ir 1 I 1rl •S mn j Ili I i I ' , II % t R l 1 ( j(1iIIILIII 1 , - 1 stases Femme.TM. ,,. Neil cra sits Ill1 ' , 1 1 , - r Ss" •:> ra ' r• rifilir ..1: /'ill,. ;j/ --/ n.., ,w 1 r , I I 07.•fpr -... w... .. w I II` I i I I } }- 1 1 i I I i _ a ' 1 o a.1 t 111 rig I - rear ZOO Or•111%Cleat Set 1 I 1 - t , RED 1 14- S T Eirpittrin 1. f..., rell boi If II014In ._... - T• i R /vs ; ' 1 i i lPFFR 1 r1 I. III I I — tT • ,..• 4 . . 1 r e , dayfS. a • 5' I I I' 1 1fw- i•M' y it _i i' '; r,*, - • ..,'fit ti — I r I I 7,_r____7____,_7_,_-- , i7/4____7,-t___ -,_i___7______7,___7„--- 45 4 gyp' Mc.kn sTeit- 4 N, y/ Moss pl.] AIMMINIIIMM 1/:y r-' ' R- 1 21-3- . i I rBlR-3 - B_ cog-1 I K-- f IL-. 1, l li i G RE E.rJ'VpOD lR_3 I c • .r TE R'i' G- 1 r ' N I 1 I F-3 Gt 1 rf 9,, C 0 1 I, .__ - 1__ 1 1 1 I 1 I IT j R9:I 1. r 1 . I 1 I s• e i . I 1 i.:: •/ t,,,. ...,,,,,, PS,..,\. 1 o rJ • S j 1 . 1 . .W ...'''......;,N z..,,;•I: .11,0S .....' 8 4::'Y.07% eill'f4,- ,•,„,.1 .,c, •• .,,.,,i E>:.'` , .-- z, b„,t,, j t,p04 ', , r r_ i. t t IIalb a%} 3 " . NA i"7":7.-.: (c .74 .4,',;10,1;p. r- r ..;, ; CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP R-067-84 APPL I CANT CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TOTAL AREA — SACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 4TH STREET EXISTING ZONING B-1, BUSINESS USE EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE REZONE TO ALLOW A MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT OF APPROX. 200 UNITS. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY, COMMERCIAL & GREENBELT COMMENTS REN I BUILDING & ZONING DEP TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET E C F - 068 - 84 APPLICATION VO(S) : R-067-84 PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPEF FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ± 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVENUE N.E. : BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th STREET. TO : PUBLIC 4ORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/20 n EN3INEERING DIVISION 1TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7/24 n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PR=VENTION BUREAU I ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I ( POLICE DEPARTMENT I ( POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JUNE 19, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : c n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED c_25 di -cf() 47 2-"I 6A-)2M DATE : SIGNATURE 0 RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN 1 BUILDING & ZONING DEF TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET E C F - 068 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : R-067-84 PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPEF FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LCCATED - 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVENUE N.E. : BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th STREET. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/20 I jENGINEERING DIVISION I ( TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7/24 I ( UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION I ( FIRE PR=VENTION BUREAU I ] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I ( POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON JUNE 19, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED fro ea/e !/e."( ,che-)vt_ L.7`1/i U-ele S`Arc c'' ' J l c IN` /L 4-4- A6..- Sy S a, lv z S-/"' e- 4a-0 DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN I BUILDING & ZONING DEP FMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET E C F - 068 - 84 APPLICATION JO(S) : R-067-84 PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPER FROM B-1 TO P-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LCCATED ± 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVENUE N.E. : BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th STREET. TO : l IP• UBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/20 I ( ENGINEERING DIVISION I ( TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7/24 n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION I ( F• IRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ( P• ARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT I ( POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON JUNE 19, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : l/T/4-/T y ,4it/6-/A/.--, A/ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SVIIEB T TO F/ ' LATE COMERS AIREEMENI WATER Y5 W-23q" 0 )0‘ , 7/ibe 7.//. Dyc/1/,E _ LATE COMERS ACAEENENI - SEWER S gg-A/O SYSTEM DEIEIIPMENT ,ARCE WATER S -/75- o per 1,6,,,-c74 4FP,eD Fae ,e zoNE SYSTEM IEVELIPMENT CHANGE - SEWER ycES /75 '42 per i'- 7 - DA/Ly SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER No SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SEWER 4nr 4 t" APPROVED WATER PLAN Y n_bgAPPROVEDSEWERPLAN1/ S I APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT IC' INN j BY FIRE DEPT. Y FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS S C DATE : 6/ 17.2;K SIGNATURE OF /DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE D REVISION 5 REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP FMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET E C F - 068 - 84 APPLICATION VO(S) : R-067-84 PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPEL FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LO:ATED ± 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVENUE N. E. : BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th STREET. TO : n P• UBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/20 ENGINEERING DIVISION rn TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7/24 n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n F• IRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDINB & ZONING DEPARTMENT n P• OLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON JUNE 19, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 'T'ig,9/=ic L 6,N c j/ APPROVED M APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED 7a-r T i 'e i f' Q fe !h L I D itsE 4 t st w 1 t LL ZL, Doti-d of re- - s P t`" ,, Lv,e" p rx) se—A 1 - 4 S4" 3 I U,,,4_,Q4-9 Ys" s( 4-0Di) Gte-4 Ei cx__-1- 4-Q.D v- t L, e_5 Va t1 er G1.4ni/ /e T fury ae;/., V ¢ S^ k.) J J DATE : d-up /y,/ ‘;; SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AU ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE oBoX6o` v'e Pe r CeH SS SS nn" Tv-a / v3 s c 6 J r L REVISION 5/1982 0.541N AMENDED FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): R-067-84 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-068-84 Description of Proposal:Application to rezone approximately 8.0 acres of property from B-1 to R-3 to allow construction of approximately 200 multi-family dwelling units. Proponen'_: Crowne Pointe Limited Partnership Location )f Proposal: Located approximately 150 feet north of N.E. 4th Street, between Monroe Avenue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E., between the 3700 and 3800 block of N.E. 4th Street. Lead Age icy: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on June 20, June 27, July 25, August 1, and August 22, 1984, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Gene Williams, Richard Houghton, Jerry Lind, Michael Parness, Robert Bergstrom, James Hanson, Ronald Nelson, James Matthew, and Roger Blaylock. After an appeal by the applicant, the Land Use Hearing Examiner remanded to the ERC the first condition of the DNSI on October 2, 1984, and the ERC reconsidered on October 10 and 17, 1984. Incorporal ed by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-068-84 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Colin Quinn. dated May 29, 1984. 2. Application: Rezone (R-067-84). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities Engineering Division, and the Police Department. 4. Recommendations for a declaration of significance: Fire Prevention Bureau. 5. Recommendation for more information: Policy Development Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a sicnificant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject rezone will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties and shall be subject to the following conditions being complied with: 1.The western 30 feet of the subject site shall be dedicated for the extension of Queen Avenue N.E. 2.The eastern access onto N.E. 4th Street shall be eliminated when Queen Avenue N.E. is extended from N.E. 4th Street. 3. At least thirty (30) feet of the central entrance road shall be at grade with N.E. 4th Street to allcw proper sight distance to the east. AMENDED FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE CROWNE POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: ECF-068-84, R-067-84 OCTOBEF. 29, 1984 PAGE 2 4. Crowne Point Limited Partnership shall participate in the signal improvement cost for the intersection of N.E. 3rd Street and Edmonds Avenue N.E. The assessment am)unt shall be $3,024.00 and be due upon the issuance of a building permit. INFORMA TION: 1. Upon issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall construct the half street of Queen Avenue N.E. with at least 22 feet of paving, curbs, gutter, sidewalk, etc., per approval of the Public Works Department. 2.The site plan submitted to the Committee on August 22, 1984, is not approved as pre3ented. The plan does not meet Fire Department access requirements. Ronald G. Nelson Michael Parness Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor 7r4/ Richard C Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: October 29, 1984 APPEAL DATE: November 12, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF _ 068 _84 AMMMENDED OCTOBER 17, 1984 APPLICATION No(s ) : R-067-84 PROPONENT: CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED + 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVE. N.E. AND UNION AVE. N.E. : BETWEEN THE 3700 & 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th STREET. SITE AREA: R_ I AC'RF.R BUILDING AREA (Gross) : N/4, DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : x 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: x 3) Water & Water Courses : x 4) Plant Life: x 5) Animal Life: x 6) Noise: x 7) Light & Glare: x 8) Land Use; North: VACANT East :COMMERCIAL & SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL South: MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL West :MOBILE HOME PARK Land Use Conflicts : CONFLICT WITH GREENBELT POLICY AS PROPOSE.» View Obstruction: x 9) Natural Resources : x 10) Risk of Upset :x 11) Population/Employment : x 12) Number of Dwellings : 200 X _ 13) Trip Ends ( ITE) : TRTP ENDS Traffic Impacts : ALONG N.E. 3rd-4th ST. CORRIDOR x 14) Public Services : X 15) Energy:X 16) Utilities : X 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/History: X Signatures : 71//%4k.t9-7,-(__ Ronald G. Nelson Michael Parness Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor 1 2,( PUBLISHED: OCTOBER 29, 1984 Richard C. Houghton APPEAL DATE: NOVEMBER 12, 1984 Public Works Director C_R1 0542N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENT AL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following project: CE;NTRON CORPORATION (TERRACE APARTMENTS) (ECF-101-84) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of 264 apartments on an 8.4 acre site, file SA-099-84; located between N.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th Street and west of Edmonds Avenue N.E., if extended. CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ECF-068-84) Application to rezone approximately 8.0 acres of property from B-1 to R-3 to allow construction of approximately 200 multi-family dwelling units, file R-067-84; located approximately 150 feet north of N.E. 4th Street, between McInroe Avenue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E., between the 3700 and 3800 blc,ck of N.E. 4th Street. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-signi-icance for the following projects: CITY OF RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ECF-104.-84) S.W. Grady Way Street Improvements. This is the final phase of street widening of Grady Way from an existing two-lane road to a four-lane road wil.h a left-turn center lane. CI fY OF RENTON, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (ECF-105-84) Installation of 205 lineal feet of new 12-inch watermain inside of an 18-inch ca!dng under I-405 along Raymond Avenue S.W. Further nformation regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action mist be filed with the Hearing Examiner by November 12, 1984. Published October 29, 1984 NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. R-067-84, ECF-068-84 PROPOSED ACTION APPI IIATION TO RF7ONF APPROXIMATFI Y R.O ACRFS OF PROPERTY FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATFIY 200 Ml11TI FAMIIY DWELLING UNITS. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4TH ST. , BETWEEN MONROE AVE. N,E, AND UNION IV. N.E., BETWEEN THE 3700 AND 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4TH ST. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE t E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES ADOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:C1O P.M., NOVFMRFR 12, 1 OR4 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION OF J y r;rretIN BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT aa RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR Zseaw, o p Ra MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O P RATED SI.PTE O BARBARA Y, SHINPOCH MAYOR October 23, 1984 John E. 'hillips Market Place One - Suite 555 2001 Western Avenue Seattle, WA 98121 Ref: C rown Pointe Limited Partnership/Environmental Remand Dear Mr. Phillips: The Environmental Review Committee have reviewed their environmental decision based upon tt•e remand decision of the Land Use Hearing Examiner in reference to file AAD-053-84. The ERC is reviewing the remand under the old environmental regulations based uF on legal advise from the City Attorney. The Environmental Review Committee has deleted Contingent #1 and replaced it with three additional environmental mitigating measures. These are specifically delineated on the attEiched revised environmental decision signed by the members of the Committee. These conditions are as follows: 1.The western thirty (30) feet of the subject site shall•be dedicated for the extension of Queen Avenue N.E. 2.1 he eastern access on N.E. 4th Street shall be eliminated when Queen Avenue N.E. i , extended from N.E. 4th Street to the subject site. 3. /.t least thirty (30) feet of the central access roadway shall be at grade with N.E. 4th Street to allow adequate site distance to the east. As a ge-ieral informational note, the Uniform Fire Code will require that the subject site provide two points (one primary and one secondary) emergency access that do not converge at one point. (This will probably require a twenty (20) foot wide fire access roadway along the eastern property line.) John E. P'nillips October ;'3, 1984 Page 2 Based upon the publication date of October 26th for the environmental declaration, a public hearing date of November 13th is tentatively scheduled. By establishing this earlier public hearing date than normally allowed by our departmental procedures, the applicant takes the chance of a possible appeal upto two working days before the hearing date. Tl ere have been some incidences where appeals have been submitted on the last day and the public hearing, that had been scheduled, had to be continued. I don't anticipat 3 that an appeal will happen in this case, but it is only appropriate to advise you of the po;sibility. Sincerely, I e CTS(6. 4URoger . Blaylock Zoning A iministrator RJB:113' Z:c1 111 l 7 r" LAW OFFICES OF 1 PHILLIPS & WILSON 5 It / A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION Z/MARKET PLACE ONE-SUITE 555 JOHN E.PHILLIPS 2001 WESTERN AVENUE BARBARA A.WILSON SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98121 206) 467-7766 October 9 , 1984 CITY OF RENTON Mr , Roger Blaylock FRIg 1984ZoningAdministratorour City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Re: Crown Pointe Limited Partnership File No. AAD/093/84 Dear Roger : As I informed you today, our client, Crown Pointe Limited Partnership ( "Crown Pointe" ) , would like to resolve the matter that is before the Environmental Review Committee ERC") tomorrow. As you are aware , the Examiner reversed the ERC and r) directed the ERC to reconsider the condition requiring Crown Pointe to extend Queen Avenue North through the acquisition and dedication of a thirty-foot area located on the south property line to NE 4th Street . While our client does not object to the extension of Queen Avenue North, they do not own the extension property and have been unable to purchase that property. Crown Pointe could not , therefore, satisfy the condition previously imposed by the ERC. At this time, our client does not believe it is neces- sa:y to extend Queen Avenue North to NE 4th Street. Crown Po..nte has provided two other adequate and sufficient means of access to serve its development from NE 4th Street. Any extension of Queen Avenue North would only be necessary at a time when properties to the north, west or south of the Crown Pointe site are developed. If the ERC determines that Queen Avenue North should be ex-:ended at some future time, our client, if required, is prepared to pay for the fair market value of the thirty-foot area from the south portion of our client ' s property to NE 4tn Street. However , we request that Crown Pointe and the Ci :y now determine the maximum price to be paid by our client when the City acquires the extension property through condemnation or other means. Since Crown Pointe would 'be responsible for paying an amount up to the agreed fair market value, the other property owners, including the Mr Roger B1U Dck Oc'_ober 9 , 1! Page Two owners to the north, south or the east , would pay for all improvements to Queen Avenue North. Because two other means of access to and from NE 4th Street are presently provided , we assume no delay will occur in the Crown Pointe rezone and development as a result of any condemnation or other proceedings the City may under- take. If you have any questions regarding the foregoing or world like us to provide you with additional information, please feel free to contact us . We are happy to discuss this matter with you or any other member of the ERC. Very truly yours, John E. Phillips JEP: nlh cc : Ronald G. Nelson, Building and Zoning Director Richard C. Houghton, Public Works Director Crown Pointe Limited Partnership CITY OF RENTON DO f 1f OCT 91984 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 0701E October 2, 1984 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPELLANT: CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FILE NO. AAD-093-84 SUMMAF Y OF APPEAL: Appeal of a condition of the ERC requiring dedication of certain property for future half-street alignment of Queen Avenue N.E. Hearing Examiner Decision: Decision of ERC is reversed. Mat PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hear ng was opened on September 25, 1984, at 9:05 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The folio Ning exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Correspondence contained in file relative to this Appeal. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan. Exhibit #3 - Vicinity Map. The appe31 hearing was opened and testifying for the applicant was: John Phillips 2001 Western Avenue - Suite #555 Seattle, Washington, 98121 Mr. Phillips was advised by the Hearing Examiner that State law indicates that the burden of proof in the determination of the ERC is upon the appellant, and with this information Mr. Phillips presented his testimony. Mr. Phillips stated they are requesting the Examiner to reverse the condition of the ERC requiring the applicant to acquire and dedicate a 30 ft. area on their south property line to N.E. L th. He made reference to the Site Plan and stated the development would occur on both ides of the power line easement that runs through the property. He stated there are 2 accesses to N.E. 4th Street from this development. Mr. Phillips stated they would buy the property in question if they could, but they do not own it or control said property so they have no method to acquire the ownership. The ERC has requested the developer to dedicate a 30 ft. wide easement the entire length of their property from north to south. They have agreed to do this for the future development of Queen Avenue north, if it is ever developed. That easement would not be used in this applicant's development - it would be used by other people who may develop to the north of the subject property so they ma:' have access to N.E. 4th. The applicant has applied for a down-zone from existing :zoning of B-1 to R-3 to allow the multi-family development. The down-zone was requested because in September of 1983 the B-1 zoning classification was amended which no longer permitted only multi-family development. There would have to be a mixed use of commercial and multi-family and this type of development was not planned by the applicant. Mr. Philips advised the Hearing Examiner that the applicant has provided two other means of access for this development to reach N.E. 4th Street, which is believed sufficient to serve this development. They would not object to the extension of Queen Avenue North if they owned the property, but they have made every effort to contact the owner and have been unsuccessful. He stated they feel the requirement for the applicant to acquire another persons property is inappropriate in this situation because if it becomes DMINISTRATIVE APPEAL ROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AD-093-84 ctober 2, 1984 age 2 condition of this rezone, the owner of the property could charge a premium for the property. If they cannot agree on a price, this project could be delayed or may not be able to be developed at all. They feel if they could have the condemnation powers the city has, they would have the property in question condemned and then pay the fair market value for the property if the City feels it is necessary for future development to the north. He feels the alignment in question has been set by the ERC and not by the city policy makers, and questioned whether or not the alignment should be located where it is now suggested. Mr. Phillips questioned if it is necessary to extend Queen Avenue North, and if the single family properties that would be served by Queen Avd ue North should be coming down N.E. 4th Street to come into the city. He also questiond whether the apartment developments, commercial developments and future developments directly to the north of the property should go through the single family properties to Queen Avenue North. He feels these matters should be decided by the City Council and not by the ERC. The Hearing Examiner asked Mr. Phillips if the power line is an easement or privately pcaned. Mr. Phillips replied that it is owned by City Light; the applicant owns the roperty and City Light owns the easement over the corridor. Mr. Phillips referred to the State Environmental Policy Act to reiterate his feeling that there needs to be an adopted policy or goal and he does not feel there is an adopted policy or goal stating Queen Avenue North will be built in this particular location. He feels there are sufficient State guidelines to interpret that portion of RCW-43.21C.060 to which he was referring. With no policy adopted as to the location of Queen Avenue North, he feels it unfair to ask the applicant to dedicate property that belongs to someone else. He referred to mitigating measures and stated if they owned the property or could buy the property in question, they would have no problem with the dedication and/or moving of some of their other roads to accomplish the requirement of the ERC. He went on to say that if the applicant was not seeking this rezone, the property is currently zoned commercial and with that type of zoning it could be developed commercial, thereby creating much more traffic coming in on the 2 private access roads off N.E. 4th without the development of Queen Avenue North. Again, Mr. Phillips requested that the dedication condition either be eliminated, or if the condition remains that it be amended to read, "provided applicant is reasonably able to purchase the property" The applicant feels they have not been placed in a fair position, and again requested reconsideration of the condition. The Hearing Examiner called for further testimony in favor of, or in opposition to this reconsideration request. Responding further was: Michael Read 2225 - 4th Avenue Seattle, Washington, 98121 Mr. Read stated he is a limited partner in Crowne Point and the previous owner of the property. He stated this property had been before the City Council as the Renton Business Park. The property in question is a piece of property he has tried to purchase since 1978. He has been unsuccessful in his dealings with the owner since that time. He feels the proposed access is impossible for anyone to acquire. cdesponding to Mr. Read, Mr. Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator asked for a arification as to the type of commercial development Renton Business Park would have contained. Mr. Read advised it was proposed as combination office/warehouse in the B-1 zone. Mr. Blaylock commented on the ERC's concern of access for this development. He stated the concern here is to minimize access from independent developments on to arterial streets. Mr. Blaylock stated it may be feasible at this point for the City to condemn the property, purchase said property and sell it to the applicant at a fair market value. He continued stating the central area of the area in question is now becoming 1 ndlocked, and from a planning principle the Building and Zoning Deptment felt there iust be some type of access in that area. With that in mind, the ERC decided they could t y to create a street underneath the power lines, or to use an alignment for Queen A enue North. He stated that policies suggest that access should be provided to areas as t ey are developing. Mr. Blaylock stated he believes the ERC does have the authority, when there is a general policy, to direct and require conditions. The Hearing Examiner s ated it is important to determine if the conditions imposed are fair and reasonable in li ht of the circumstances - as in this case the applicant may be required to obtain p operty that he does not own, nor may be capable of purchasing. T e Hearing Examiner called for further testimony. There being no one else wishing to t stify, or make further comment, the hearing was closed at 9:40 A.M. ADMINIS [RATIVE APP CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AAD-093-84 October `2 , 1984 Page 3 FINDING 3, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDING 3: 1.The appellants, Crown Pointe Limited Partnership, filed a request to rezone approximately 8.0 acres of property from B-1 (Business/Commercial) to R-3 Medium Density Multifamily). Pursuant to an environmental review, the Ervironmental Review Committee issued a Declaration of Non-Significance for the re!one subject to a series of conditions. The appellants objected to one of the conditions regarding acquisition and dedication of right-of-way in the general alignment with Queen Avenue Northeast. Thereupon, the appellants filed this appeal. 2.The subject site is located between Monroe Avenue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E. on the north side of the approximately 3700 block of N.E. 4th Street. While the subject site has two separate "dogleg" extensions reaching N.E. 4th, thereby providing frontage along N.E. 4th, the majority of the subject site is located approximately 150 ft. north of that right-of-way. 3.The condition giving rise to this appeal is actually contained within a condition on the extension and dedication of Queen Avenue N.E. along the western boundary of the subject site. The entire condition is restated below with the underlined portion representing the portion at issue. Condition No. 1 of the Final Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) issued by the Er vironmental Review Committee (ERC). The western thirty (30) feet width of the subject property shall be dedicated to the City of Renton for the future half-street alignment of Queen Avenue N.E. Acquisition and dedication of said width from the south property line to N.E. 4th Street shall also be done to complete this alignment." 4.Tt e property to which the condition applies is not owned or controlled by the appellants. After the imposition of the condition, the appellants tried entering into negotiations for the property but their attempts have not been answered. A pr adeces;or in interest to the current appellants had tried to purchase the property in question in a prior period, but also to no avail. 5.Tt e appellants do not argue with the underlying reasons for the City's wanting to establish a roadway in this alignment, that is to preserve and protect the arterial functions of N.E. 4th by minimizing intersections, both public and private, with N.E. 4th. The safe functioning of arterials is preserved and protected by minimizing turning movements not only from private driveways but also by minimizing the number of intersections with cross streets, and further providing a reasonable interval between all such places where turning movements occur. 6. W file they did argue that other alignments could serve the City's purpose regarding arterial functioning, they did not object to dedicating the westernmost 30 feet of their property to the City for the proposed right-of-way, and indicated that they would forgo using one or both of their dogleg frontages along N.E. 4th Street if Queen Ave were opened to N.E. 4th Street. They also stated a willingness to pay for the purchase of the portion in question if the City used its condemnation pc wers since the property in question's owner would not talk to them at all. CONCLUSIONS 1.The decision of the ERC and this decision are based upon the Guidelines found in WAC 197-10 rather than the new Guidelines found in WAC 197-11 which became effective on October 1, 1984, at which time "all agencies must adopt their own SE PA procedures." 2.The dec'Ginn of the governmental agency acting as the responsible official is entitled "s when reviewed in a procedure such as this appeal. RCW 43.21C. . Therefore, the determination of the ERC, the City's responsible official, is entitled to substantial weight and the appellants have the burden of de monstrating that t! "?C's decision was in error. DMINISTRATIVE APPEAL ROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AD-093-84 ctober 2, 1984 age 4 The meaning of the term "substantial weight" has been further refined by the courts of this state with the thrust that if the purpose of the decision is to give further affect to protecting the environment or requiring full disclosure, the decision will only be modified or overturned if the determination was arbitrary and capricious (Short v. Clallam County, 22 Wn. App. 825, 829, 1979). Whereas, if the decision does not provide full disclosure, the lesser standard of clearly erroneous will permit modification or reversal. (Hayden v. Port Townsend, 93 Wn. 2d 870, 880, 1980) 4. A decision is arbitrary and capricious when it is "willful and unreasoning action in disregard of facts and circumstances" (Stempel v. Department of Water Resources, 82 Wn. 2d 109, 114, 1973). On the other hand "a finding is 'clearly erroneous' when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." Norway Hill Preservation and Protection Association v. King County Council, 87 Wn. 2d 267, 274, 1976). 5.The intent of the condition imposed by the ERC is to preserve the function of N.E. 4th Street as an arterial The appellants did not argue with this rationale, only the impose n ion the appellants feel is potentially outside of their control. That is, the acquisition and dedication of r e. nor control, an e sa e of which that property's owner is apparently unwilling to even disc ss. 6. As imposed, the absolute affect of the condition could put the appellants in a hostage type position with the property's current owner. This would especially be the case if that owner knows the appellants cannot proceed on the underlying rezone request without coming to terms over the controverted property. Not only could this put the appellant in an untenable position with respect to his project, but the condition could unreasonably color any negotiations concerning the property. 7.While the current decision is based upon the "old" SEPA Guidelines, the new guidelines' logic cannot be ignored even if the application of these new guidelines is premature in the legal sense. "Mitigation measures shall be reasonable and capable of being accomplished." (WAC 197-11-660(1)(c)). Whether review is under the arbitrary and capricious standard or the clearly erroneous standard, the test of reasonableness of performance appears compelling. 8.The appellant agreed to utilize the Queen Avenue alignment, if it is opened, rather than its existing frontage upon N.E. 4th Street, and stated willingness to pay for acquisition at the fair market value of the controverted property, if the City can provide the means of achieving acquisition. Currently there is no willingness to negotiate on the part of the present owner, and the City by imposing the condition may have thwarted any potential for fair negotiation. The property is not owned by the appellant, and its owner may not want to sell it. While access from the appellant's property to Queen Avenue rather than directly to 4th Street may b e necessary to mitigate adverse impacts - e condition as s ated is unreasonable. The condition as imposed is unreasonable by any standard and the decision of the ERC must be reversed. 9.While the appellant argued that the condition should either (1) be modified by this reviewing body to permit the appellant to pay for the property if it should be condemned by the City, or (2) reversed outright without further action by the ERC, the circumstances are such that the matter must be remanded back to the ERC, the agency with expertise in this matter. /1hbile_the condition as stuJd was unreasonable, that does not then reach the overall decision re arding whet er a DNS was appropriate without that condition. It may very well be the considered judgmen o e een Ave N.E. cannot be extended as proposed, then the DNS issued for the subject site was inappropriate,_ Certainly in matters concerning the condemnation powers of the City, the ERC is not the final authority, nor is this office. This office does not possess sufficient information regarding the impacts of the subject proposal, vis-a-vis the proposed extension of Queen Ave N.E. to substitute its judgment in this matter. 'Therefore, the matter is remanded back to h . ER . for a decision not inconsistent with this determination. DCISION The determination of the ERC is reversed and the matter is remanded back to the ERC for a decision not inconsistent with this determination. ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AAD-093-84 October 2, 1984 Page 5 ORDERED THIS 2nd day of October, 1984. ice 1-44.. ---,Fred IIKaun Land Use Hea ing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 2nd day of October, 1984 to the parties of record: John Phillips 2001 Western Avenue - Suite #555 Seattle, Washington, 98121 Michael Read 2225 - 4th Avenue Seattle, Washington, 98121 TRANSMITTED THIS 2nd day of October, 1984 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Gene Williams, Policy Development Department Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before October 16, 1984. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgmen., or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) day 3 from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. Any app3a1 is governed by Title IV, Section 3011, which requires that such appeal be filed with the Superior Court of Washington for King County within twenty (20) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. OF i? O THE CITY OF RENTON U 4-0 Z MUNICIPAI BUIIDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASN. 98055 asiL CD-0 Z1 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER A FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0< Q 9TE0 SEP1a ' September 3, 1984 Colin Quinr Director of Governmental Relations/L and Planning CENTRON 855 106th Ave. N.E. C-90001 Bellevue, V\ashington, 98009 Re: Crown Pointe Rezone Application R-067-84 - Notice of Appeal Dear Mr. Quinn: The appeal hearing you request on the above entitled matter will be held on September 25, 1984 in the City Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, beginning at 9:00 A.M. The Petitic ner will have the burden of demonstrating that the referenced condition of ECF-068-8 ft is not applicable to the proposed rezone request. If you have any questions regarding this matter please feel free to call this office. Sincerely, Kam" FRED J. I\UFMAN LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER F3K/dk/065 4E cc: City Attorney City Clerk Building and Zoning Department flEJJE Computer Aided Research for Economic Development 2225 - 41f, AVE -. 2040.WESTLAKE AVE. N. M[:ZZ.SUITE 300 SEATTEE, WA 98109 A u g u t 23, 1984 SEATILE, WA 98121 s` `w4. (206) 282-1051 206) 682-0931 4 Mr. Roger Blaylock Building & Zoning Department CITY OFRENTON 200 Mill Ave. S 1-j-i/ N IV/ORenton, WA 98055 AUG 2 41984 ` I RE: ( rown Pointe Rezone R -067-84 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Dear Mr. Blaylock You may remember from our meetings in the past that I have an interest in the property which was the " Renton Business Park" and now is called Crown Pointe Apartments" . was very distressed to note the change in the B1 zoning code which affected this property after all the time and expense which I went to in assen bling this property and the hearings and committee meetings that resulted in the change in the ordinance regarding the Special Permit procEss. I refer you to File No. SP-338-79 and the letter from the Mayor's offic ? dated August 1, 1979 in which the City Council reversed the decision of the Hearing Examiner based on an error of law. I intend to bring this matter to the attention of all concerned with any petition to rezone this prop( rty. hereby request that you notify me of all meetings, hearings or other communications regarding the ongoing status of this property. I wish to register my strong opposition to any rezone at this juncture and consider such a change to be one of severe environmental significance. SincErely yours, PACIrIC REALSEARCH INC . Michae N. Read, President MNR:hp Encl : OF I, 4 27 : LEDPri094 O, flq' 6.0 SEPTt, City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON SEPTENI3ER 18, 1984 BEGINNING AT 9:OO A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: FILE R-067-84 X ' REZONE From____ __B-1 ___ To R-3 SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To__ SITE APPROVAL SHoRT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 150' NORTH OF NE 4TH STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVE NE AND UNION AVE NE, BETWEEN THE 3700 AND 3800 BLOCK OF NE 4TH STREET, LEGAL C ESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION C] SIGNIFICANT MNON-SIGNIFICANT FOU FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO SE REMOVED WIT OUT OF I fr 4.- ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 co- 0gTEO SE-PTEI'O BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR August ;8, 1984 Mr. Michael N. Read, President Pacific Realsearch, Inc. 2225 - 4 th Avenue, Mezzanine Seattle, WA 98121 RE: C rown Pointe Rezone R-067-84 Dear Mt. Read: We are Ln receipt of your letter, dated August 23, 1984, and we will keep you informed of all public hearings and send you the staff report. Since you are not listed on the applicat ion as the applicant, property owner, or contact person, we will be unable to send you copies of correspondence between the City and those parties. If you wish copies, you may reNdiew the official files at any time and pay for copies. In 1981, the City Council, based upon a recommendation of the Planning Commission, adopted a revised Comprehensive Plan for the northeast section of Renton. In 1983, the City Cc>uncil modified the B-1, Business Use Zone to reduce residential uses. Extensive public hearings were held on both items. The special permit approval, SP-338-79, did not change the underlying B-1 zoning of the property which had been applied by Ordinance #1510 dated March 8, 1955. The special use permit was solely to allow self-service storage. In fact, the approval was only good for a period of two (2) years under Section 4-3015(E). Therefore, I can not comprehend your statement referring to "the change in the ordinance regarding the special permit process." If I can provide you with any further information, please contact me directly at 235-2550. Sincerely, U's-k Roger I. Blaylock Zoning Adminmistrator RJB:1065Z:cl 0495N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-sign ficance with conditions for the following project: CLOWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ECF-068-84) Application to rezone approximately 8.0 acres of property from B-1 to R-3 to allow construction of approximately 200 multi-family dwelling units, file R-067-84; located approximately 150 feet north of N.E. 4th Street, between Manroe Avenue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E., between the 3700 and 3800 black of N.E. 4th Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by September 10, 1984. Published: August 27, 1984 0496N FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): R-067-84 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-068-84 Description of Proposal:Application to rezone approximately 8.0 acres of property from B-1 to R-3 to allow construction of approximately 200 multi-family dwelling units. Proponent: Crown Pointe Limited Partnership Location cif Proposal: Located approximately 150 feet north of N.E. 4th Street, between Monroe Avenue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E., between the 3700 and 3800 block of N.E. 4th Street. Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on June 20, June 27, July 25, August 1, and August 22, 1984, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Gene Williams, Richard Houghton, Jerry Lin J, Michael Parness, Robert Bergstrom, James Hanson, Ronald Nelson, James Matthew, and Roger Blaylock. Incorpora{l ed by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-068-84 are the following: 1. En iironmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Colin Quinn, dated May 29, 1984. 2. Apalications: Rezone (R-067-84). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities Engineering Division, and the Police Department. 4. Recommendations for a declaration of significance: Fire Prevention Bureau. 5. Recommendation for more information: Policy Development Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environm3ntal checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons tor declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject rezone will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties and shall be subject to the following conditions being complied with: 1. The western thirty (30) feet width of the subject property shall be dedicated to the City of Renton for the future half-street alignment of Queen Avenue N.E. Acquisition and dedication of said width from the south property line to N.E. 4th St-eet shall also be done to complete this alignment. 2. Ci owne Pointe Limited Partnership shall participate in the signal improvement test for the intersection of N.E. 3rd Street and Edmonds Avenue N.E. The assessment amount shall be $3,024.00 and be due upon the issuance of a building permit. FINAL DE 2LARATION 0 JN-SIGNIFICANCE CROWN P JINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: ECF-068-84, R-067-84 AUGUST 2 7, 1984 PAGE 2 INFORMA TION: 1. Upon issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall construct the half street of Queen Avenue N.E. with at least 22 feet of paving, curbs, gutter, sidewalk, etc. per approval of the Public Works Department. 2.ThE site plan submitted to the Committee on August 22, 1984, is not approved as presented. This plan does not meet the Greenbelt Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. SIGNATURES: Ronald G. Nelson Michael Par ess Building a id Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor t 7 Richard C. Houghton ./ Public Woks Director PUBLISHED: AUGUST 27, 1984 APPEAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 068 - 84 APPLICATION No(s) : R-067-84 PROPONENT: CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED. + 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVE. N.E. AND UNION AVE. N.E. : BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th STREET. SITE AREA: 8.0 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross) : N/A DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : x 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: X 3) Water & Water Courses : x 4) Plant Life: x 5) Animal Life: x 6) Noise: x 7) Light & Glare: x 8) Land Use; North: VACANT East : COMMERCIAL & SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL South: MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL West : MOBILE HOME PARK Land Use Conflicts : CONFLICT WITH GREENBELT POLICY AS PROPOSED. View Obstruction: 9) Natural Resources: x 10) Risk of Upset : x 11) Population/Employment : X 12) Number of Dwellings : 200 X 13) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 1080 TRIP ENDS Traffic Impacts: ALONG N.E. 3rd-4th STREET CORRIDOR. 14) Public Services: X 15) Energy:X 16) Utilities : x 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics :X 19) Recreation:X 20) Archeology/History: X Signatures : Ronald G. Nelson Michael ess Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor PUBLISHED: AUGUST 27, 1984 Ri hard C. Houghto APPEAL DATE: SEPTEMBER i 0, 1984 Public Works Director t tit r I Date circulated : JUNE 12, 1984 Comments due : JUNE 19, 1984 ENVIRONIMEMITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 068 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . R-067-84 PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED- 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVE. N.E. ; BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th SIRELI . SITE AREA : 8.0 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR.MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 0go rp Lvs;izz,-,=,e.: Lo4 traffic impacts : kcs , - PC uti-, C r a ,';ti 2 c bf° /,•.,,f i I be 9-44ut rd ?o ,V-UU,u" 7- :'4/.4rea ct, IQ14 ) Public :services : 1lf- Eda.,t cif .4ue AIL 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human heslth : ' 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : I" 1COMMENTS : cv- p ve c OV\ f' h t T t`o d,cd. FV7v Lt. Efrthi 1.-t,L-4-i 1—e-N-- f-k\".\A ` C"(-)122/4c", 1 U a 5,` (' r NC 3 =4-S o,-tS e Recommendation :' DNSSII G DOS More Information Reviewed by : ,dy itle : da c. S c-; 3. 7`--7 Date : 7 / V"c',/ FORM: ERC-06 l DDoc> 17 Z ,I SSe55 11dL/ _ 3o,. X Date circulated : JUNE 12, 1984 Comments due : JUNE 19, 1984 ENVIRONIMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 068 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . R-067-84 PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS JLN 1 3 i134 Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ± 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVE. N.E. ; BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th STRLLI . SITE AREA : 8.0 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR.MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : 77 'dGf/ - /Po a.o/.may 'v/i Am" G ? pc vim r'c / yE,o E,o ra m od• AA a gGC St 7p T, # S i4.(/.ra ,a a?b.J/..)G p/7.-v/t3t•77Es sya'T—.1 ,E'.ect2 Fi.EtQL Q i 7 TES r-i.t i4.t? 4ictAi/ L>,Ciot,k S/S%M .CEO lJ/ce / 2P9 AYS /190, e'd19 / Tf Ai/4 Recommendation : DNSI DOSj/ More Information_/ 014.1SOV'Reviewed b `- wrrr/!//// 1 itle Date : Or FORM: ERC-06 1 Date circulated : JUNE 12, 1984 Comments due : JUNE 19, 1984 ENIVIRONMEINTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 068 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . R-067-84 PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED_- 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVE. N.E. ; BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th SIRLEI . SITE AREA : 8.0 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR.MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air q'uality : ,_ i 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : Ur' 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : - / w,',/ reo w+' 5S'"<f 2 /u S ifteci cry V63 Recommendation : DNSI X DOS More Information Reviewed by :Ct litle : Date : FORM: ERC-06 a, - uT1un › Date circulated : JUNE 12, 1984 Comments due : JUNE 19, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 068 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . R-067-84 PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED- 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVE. N.E. ; BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th SIREEI . SITE AREA : 8.0 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR.MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : A/ 4) Plant life : V 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : V 7 ) Light & glare : 1/ 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : I/ View obstruction : j% 9 ) Natural resources : 1% 10 ) Risk of upset : o,// 11 ) Population/Employment : 1 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : V/, 16 ) Utilities : i, 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : U' 20 ) Archeology/history : I/ COMMENTS : A) ,,.4- SCAN c/ c1,, Recommendation : DN / hA DOS More Information` 6/T/,L T 4:,C4c/A.4 E.E'Reviewed by : lilt" 1 itle : y Date : G/ Z ' /rii FORM: ERC-06 ill t'._:I LA)I tJ C_, Date circulated : JUNE 12, 1984 Comments due : JUNE 19, 1984 ENVIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 068 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . R-067-84 PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED- 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVE. N.E. ; BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th STRLLI . SITE AREA : 8.0 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR.MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : K 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : Y' 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : V 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : V 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : S( 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : X , 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : D..e,...),4.2c-7nri-- - 4b Zet Gv t 7y! 6 p &de— , --b Recommendation : DNSI Y DOS More Information, Reviewed by : 7 71 I itle : Date : 6 7 2y FORM: ERC-06 OL._ vram. Date circulated : JUNE 12, 1984 Comments due : JUNE 19, 1984 ENVIRONIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 068 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . R-067-84 PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED-. 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVE. N.E. ; BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th SIRLEI . SITE AREA : 8.0 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (96) :N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR.MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS. More Information Reviewed by :c title :e4a54. Date : b'857 FORM: ERC-06 t-cx c_y L-)E.L Date circulated : JUNE 12, 1984 Comments due : JUNE 19, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 068 - 84 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION No (s ) . R-067-84 PROPONENT : CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SUN 1 2 1984 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. PROJECT TITLE : CROWN POINTE APARTMENTS Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 8.0 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM B-1 TO R-3 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED- 150 FEET NORTH OF N.E. 4th STREET, BETWEEN MONROE AVENUE N.E. AND UNION AVE. N.E. ; BETWEEN THE 3700 AND THE 3800 BLOCK OF N.E. 4th SIKELI . SITE AREA : 8.0 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR.MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air givality : X 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : II Land use conflicts : Pt cai,, pA,1 G ,.,.c,fl. yCeAbe 4s Droj64- if p View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 1 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 1110' itiA x 14 ) Public services :Y 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : C 17 ) Human health : X 18 ) Aesthetics : 1 19 ) Recreation : x 20 ) Archeology/history : X COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information_)( Reviewed by : 4 /A) .9- 44,,,E T i t l e : lPAL0/0„4_, Date : Jl t„ti2- Z63 iq0 FORM: ERC-06 E1fE hEflLEEflEk Computer Aided Research for Economic Development 2225 - 4th AVE. 2040 • STL AVE.pd. MEZZ. S SEATTLE, WA 98121 SEAT , WA .a109 August 23, 1984 21,1 1 206) 682-0931 Mr. Roger Blaylock Building & Zoning Department CITY OFRENTON 200 Mill Ave. S Ej312NMNOWN1Renton, WA 98055 AU6 2 41984 RE: Crown Pointe Rezone R-067-84 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Dear Mr. Blaylock You may remember from our meetings in the past that I have an interest in the property which was the " Renton Business Park" and now is called Crown Pointe Apartments" . I was very distressed to note the change in the B1 zoning code which affected this property after all the time and expense which I went to in assembling this property and the hearings and committee meetings that resulted in the change in the ordinance regarding the Special Permit process. I refer you to File No. SP-338-79 and the letter from the Mayor's office dated August 1, 1979 in which the City Council reversed the decision of the Hearing Examiner based on an error of law. I intend to bring this matter to the attention of all concerned with any petition to rezone this property. I hereby request that you notify me of all meetings, hearings or other communications regarding the ongoing status of this property. I wish to register my strong opposition to any rezone at this juncture and consider such a change to be one of severe environmental significance. Sincerely yours, PACIFIC REALSEARCH INC. is ae N. ea , President MNR:hp Encl: t G CENTIZON 855 106th Avenue N E.C-90001 Bellevue.Washington 98009 206)624-1557 or (206)453-5454 CENTRON is a service mark licensed by Centron Corporation. August 22, 1984 CITY Of RENTON Mr. Rocer Blaylock lid DCityofRentonZoningAdministtatorAUG22984MunicipalBuilding 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Re: Clown Pointe Rezone R-067-84 Dear Roger : This letter is a response to your letter of August 2, 1984 detail:.ng the concerns of the ERC. I am attaching seven (7) copies of the revised site plan for your review, 1 We have revised the site plan to provide the Westerly 30 feet to be dedicated for the future Queen Avenue N.E. The set backs for the most Westerly buildings have been adjusted. 2 . The Eastern access point has been designated to convert to an emergency access when Queen Avenue N.E. is functional . 3 . We understand that the ERC does not have the ability to vary from policies of the Comprehensive Plan. We believe, however , that the interpretation of policies to specific development proposals which require public hearings before the Hearing Examiner are not the proper criteria for the ERC to make SEPA determinations. The Comprehensive Plan provides policies intended to be a general guide to land use decision making. The Comprehensive Plan states: The Plan is, of necessity, general in its proposals. It must be flexible, since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect the community. The Plan is not a development ordinance. " While the ERC may disagree that our proposal complies with the Greenbelt policies, the issue is clearly a policy interpretation question not an environmental issue. Therefore, we request that our proposal be forwarded to the Hearing Examiner for Rezone approval where the policy issue can properly be discussed. 4 . The parking lot configuration at the Northeast property corner has been revised to provide adequate turn around design. If you have questions regarding this matter or require additional information, please contact me at 453-5454. Sincerely, 4er Colin Quinn Director of Governmental Relations/Land Planning CQ:pjc Enclosures OF RA A 4f BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Zera MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 0. 0g1- SEP CE0O BARBARA Y. ';HINPOCH MAY01? August 2, 1984 Colin Quinn Centron 855 106th N.E., C-90001 Bellevue, WA 98009 RE: Crown Pointe Rezone/R-067-84 Dear Colii: The Envi-onmental Review Committee, after lengthly review by both City staff and on-site inspection by individual members of the Committee, has determined that the proposal 3s submitted creates a significant impact because of its design and its limited access. However, the Committee does not wish to issue a declaration of significance on the project but instead would prefer that the applicant modify the design to reflect concerns: 1. The eastern access point has a very difficult sight clearance problem and does not coordinate with any proposed street circulation plan for the area. The ERC will require that a half-street be dedicated along the alignment of Queen Avenue N.E. This would represent the dedication of the western 30 feet of your property and the acquisition of 30 feet of property from your southern property line to N.E. 4th Street. 2.The central access will be the primary point of access until Queen Avenue is ccnstructed to full standards some time in the future. At that point, we believe that the street will function as a relief valve for the development that has occurred on both sides of N.E. 4th Street. Since Queen Avenue will be a public st-eet, the building should be relocated to comply with minimum setbacks for the R -4 zone. 3.The ERC also wishes to inform that applicant that they have no ability to vary the quantitative policy of the Comprehensive Plan that requires a maximum coverage of 25% of any designated Greenbelt areas to be paved. The plans, as presented, sr ow more than 25% and they could not issue a Declaration of Non-significance upon the design presented at this time. Solin Quinn August 2, 1984 Page 2 4.11113 Fire Department, in the site plan, has been concerned about adequate turn-around in the northeast corner of the subject site. The Environmental Review Committee is requesting that your provide a revised site plan incorpora:ing these items. The Committee believes that a 30 day period would be sufficient for your firm to at least determine whether these items can be incorporated into rede3ign. Therefore, we would like a written reply and schematic site plan back by September 1, 1984. If I can b() of any assistance, please contact me directly. Sincerely, e Lw oC., Roger J. Blaylock R Zoning Administrator RJB:1028Z:c1 A OF I 0 © ° PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION • 235 2620 NAL MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 9.3 am- 0, 9gT D G SEP1E BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR July 31 , 1984 C;T'i Gi 171i.-iTON I113 r• Ju TO : Environmental Review Committee JUL 31 1984 FROM : Richard C. Houghton, Public Works Director SUBJECT : Crown Pointe Development We have reviewed your request regarding additional streets adjacent to the subject development and offer the following: 1) if major access to the proposed development can be provided from a new north/south roadway, then we suggest the new roadway (Queen Ave.) be constructed; however, 2) if the major access to the new development will be provided on NE 4th, then we suggest a new roadway should not be con- structed. Basis for Recommendation The primary purpose of a major arterial is to provide good progression for through traffic. In order to do this it is necessary to minimize the number of access points to the arterial . In this case (Crown Pointe) , if we allow them a major access and also have a new intersection created by the new road, there are then two major access points within a short distance on NE 4th. Neither one will probably have significant volume to operate efficiently under signal control ; however, they will both have a significant impact on traffic conditions regarding safety and operations . 64 GAN:ad OF R4, 4 Q z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT eel rn RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0917- D SEF'SE O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYCR MEMORANDUM DATE: July 25, 1984 TO: Gary A. Norris, Traffic Engineer FROM: 4 7 9,Soger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Street Circulation Plan/Crown Pointe Apartments Crown Pointe Apartments is looking at the area just north of N.E. 4th Street approximately 500 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. There are no through streets between Union Avenue N.E. and Edmonds Avenue N.E., between N.E. 4th Street and N.E. 6th Street. Because many of the present lots within this area are landlocked without access to a public street, it does appear that we need to do some advanced planning and project a street pattern for this area. The Environmental Review Committee, in their specific review of Crown Pointe, has discussed either extending Queen Avenue N.E. to the north from 4th Street or creating a new street that would be underneath the power line right-of-way. They would appreciate a formal written opinion and map by their meeting of August 1st. CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application No. R-067-84 June 19, 1984 (date of application) Location: +150 ft. north of NE 4th Street between Monroe Ave. NE & NE Union Ave. NE. Also between 3700 and 3800 block of NE 4th Street. Application: To rezone B-1 to R-3 Allow construction of 200 multi-family dwelling units Assessment Basis : Participate in percentage cost of traffic signal installation at the intersection of NE 3rd Street and Edmonds Ave. NE. NE 3rd & Edmonds - Existing Traffic Volume 21 ,430 Crown Pointe Development - newly generated traffic volumes 1 ,080 est. 600 of trip end use NE 3rd St.) Signal Improvement Cost NE 3rd Street & Edmonds $100,000 Assessment Amount: 1080 x 60% x $100,000 = $3,02421 ,430 o TY OF RENTOT T FILE NO(S):e7-' z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT E j. D o MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES Crown Poirte Limited Partnership REZONE*(PROM Bl TO R3 ) $380 . 00 ADDRESS 855 - 106th N.E. C-9 0 0 01 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP 1 TEMPORARY PERMIT* Bellevue, WA 98009 O CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE 0 SITE PLAN APPROVAL 4 5 3- 5 4 5 4 0 GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON VARIANCE From Section: NAME Justification Required Colin Ouirn C/O Centron 0 ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 855 - 106th N.E. C-90001 SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Bellevue, WA 98009 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 453-5454 Q WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: - Crown Poirte Limited Partnership ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 855 - 106th N.E. C-90001 Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP a FINAL Bellevue, WA 98009 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 4 5 3-E 4 5 4 j Residential 0 Industrial aCommercial a Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS Between Union Ave. & Monroe + 150 ' North of N.E. 4th St. TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING I'I-11 PRELIMINARY Vacant B-1 L_J FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: ApprnYimat:el.y 200 multi-family NUMBER OF SPACES: residential units.ED ENVIRONMENTAL REVa,74 COkiMITTEE $1$0, 0 0 SQ. FT. ACRES r TOTAL FEES $530 . 00AREA: + 348 , 480 8 Z.6 f..:erIT4'Jn7ononnofi E USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAi.I14';' APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: o4.t•4-ItGt2- JUN 8 19F4 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: Accepted EDIncomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: WE, 1 I O„ j APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: f- Q Accepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: 12) Building Design Eng. Fire Parks aPolice I Policy Dev. 0 Traffic Eng.Utilities REVISION 5/1982 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Parcel A - The west half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the south 180 feet thereof; TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress and egress along the east 30 feet of the south 180 feet of the west half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County. Parcel B - The east half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the south 180 feet of the west 250 feet in width thereof; EXCEPT the south 30 feet for road. See Attached Sheet AFFIDAVIT William C. Summers being duly sworn, declare that I am DI authorized representative to act for the property owner, owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 19 `V NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, /' RESIDING AT Name of Notar.v Pi:blic)Signature of Owner) G e.,41 P4/. 4y p`. 85S Address) Address) 3,`/evoo City) State) (Zip) Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 t"0 4 Legal Description Of Property (Continued) Parcel C - The westerly 30 feet of the south 180 feet of the east half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the south 30 feet for road. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY OP RENtO ID1 JLE4 1°Itg JUN 8 1984 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Application No. `7.( 1- 0 (e 7— Environmental Checklist No. 'iF- 0 w d -d 1" PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: 5 - 22` 0 Declaration of Significance ODeclaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance © Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Crown Pointe Limited Partnership 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 855 - 106th N.E. C-90001 Bellevue, WA 98009 453-5454 3. Date Checklist submitted 5/29/84 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Crown Pointe Apartments 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Rezone of approximately 8 acres to allow construction of approximately 200 multi-family residential units. Wood frame - 2-1/2 story building with parking and recreation facilities. Previous environmental assessment prepare Nov. 1981 DNS issued 4/12/82 (ECF-034-82) for 240 unit project. e 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The property is bisected by a 200 foot wide N-S transmission easement. The site is generally level except 2 banks which drop to a level area at + 30% slopes. Limited significant vegetation exists on site. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Fall 1985 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local--including rezones) : Rezone approval - grading and utility permits - building permits all other permits required to construct this approximately 200 unit project. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: Not Applicable 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes, explain : Not Applicable 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Building Permits II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- X covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief X features? YES MAYBE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of any X unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the Xbedoftheoceanoranybay, inlet or lake? Explanation: Some changes in topography will occur MAYBE NO with the development of this property. This will involve some soil displacement, however these changes will not be significant. Erosion control will be implemented through a City approved storm water plan. 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air X quality? YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE NU— c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The air quality may be reduced to some degree with the introduction of residential fireplaces and additional traffic, however these changes should be minor. 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?X YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE N f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , X or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Development of the site will increase the amount of impervious surfaces. The additional run off will be controlled by a City approved storm water system. 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , Xmicrofloraandaquaticplants)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The property contains limited significant vegetation as a result of the transmission easement. Landscaping will be introduced throughout the site with development. 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,X insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The property lacks habitat features conducive to wildlife. Some forms of insects and microfauna may be displaced. Household pets may be introduced to the area. 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Those noises typically associated with residential uses can be expected with this proposal . 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES MAYBEWU— Explanation: All new light sources will be designed to minimize glare. 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The development of the property will convert vacant land into residential uses. 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Those typical of residential development. 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population X of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation:This development will provide approximately 200 dwelling units. 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or Xcreateademandforadditionalhousing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: This proposal will create approximately 200 multi-family residential units. 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or X movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , X bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: This proposal will generate traffic and parking demands typical of multi-family housing. Adequate facilities exist to handle the increased demands . L1D-326 See TPE Traffic Analysis from previous environmental assessment. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities?X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require X the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NO Explanation:The structures will meet required energy codes. 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : X a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE Fib— f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: . The site will require utility connections to mains and sources however these are minor. Utilities exist to adequately serve this site. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding X mental health)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive X site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Recreation facilities will be constructed on site. 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full discl ure on my part. Proponent: L`r signed Colin Quinn (Agent) name printed) Crown Pointe Limited Partnership City of Renton Building G Zoning Department May, 1983 Form R 176 Cd;Y Or Nitii: ON 7. ro d oCROWNPOINTEREZONEJUSTIFICATIONJLJUN81984 i UlL DING: L ING Crown Pointe Limited Partnership is requesting a rezone from B-1 Business District) to R-3 (Residential District) for an 8 acre parcel approximately 150 feet North of N.E. 4th Street between Union Avenue and Monroe Avenue. The intent of the rezone is to allow for medium density residential development uses which were previously allowed under the B-1 zoning. The proposed rezone is necessary as the result of a zoning text amendment adopted by the City which limits residential uses in the B-1 zone to mixed use situations with no residential uses on the first floor . The requested rezone would reestablish development rights which have been in place on this property for 29 years. The mixed use residential restrictions now a part of the B-1 zone make development of this property infeasible. As a result of the land ownership pattern in the area, this property has very limited street frontage on N.E. 4th and limited commercial value. We will demonstrate that the R-3 zone is: compatible with the Comprehensive Plan Map and policies, provides a transition buffer between single-family and commercial properties; and that the availability of utility improvements exist to justify the rezone request. BACKGROUND: B-1 (Business District) zoning was applied to this property in 1955 by City of Renton Ordinance #1510. The most recent Comprehensive Plan amendment in the area occurred in 1981 with the adoption of Ordinance #3589 the "Northeast Renton Plan" . Ordinance #3750, modifying the B-1 zone, was approved by the City of Renton September 26, 1983. The property owner was not specifically notified and thus had no knowledge of the text change. The property owner had no input regarding a modification which dramatically affects this property. Crown Pointe Limited Partnership has been actively pursuing the development of this property for multi-family residential uses since 1981. Evidence of this is indicated by: Transportation Planning and Engineering Traffic Analysis 1981; Environmental Assessment-Renton Apartments Triad Associates 1981; Drainage Study by Dodds Engineers 1981; Golder Associates Soils report 1982; Final Declaration of Non-Significance (ECF-034-82) issued April 12, 1982 for a 240 multi-family residential apartment complex; N.E. 4th Street LID easement granted 1984. CURRENT LAND USE: The subject property is currently vacant with the exception of a small retail wood-carving shop located at the southeast property corner. The site is bisected north-south by a 200 foot wide power transmission easement. Present land use in the area is very mixed with commercial, retail, vacant land and multi-family residential. Land uses surrounding the property include the Hi-Lands Mobile Home Manor located West of the site; undeveloped property to the East and North; the Cedar River Animal Hospital and Tiger T.V. Shop to the immediate Southwest; and the Gull Gas Station and Quick-Stop Food Store to the immediate South. Located across N.E. 4th Street is the Greenwood Cemetery and several commercial establishments. Public utility improvements have occurred in this area which benefit this property. L. I .D. #326 will make street improvements along N.E. 4th Street between Monroe and Union. Additionally, improvements have occurred in the downstream sanitary sewer system which improve the flows for this property. Private commercial and residential development has occurred in the area over the past years affecting the character of the neighborhood. Commercial development has occurred primarily to the East of 4th and Union. Residential development has occurred primarily to the West of this site. Based on previous development trends, this site is ideally suited for medium density residential uses as a transition between the residential areas and commercial development occurring in the vicinity. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Crown Pointe property is located in the Northeast Quadrant Comprehensive Plan Area. The Comprehensive Plan Map indicates: the West half of the property as medium density residential , the 200 foot wide BPA easement as Greenbelt, and the East half of the site as commercial. The properties to the North are designated low density multi-family and single-family. To the East is property shown as commercial . By extending the medium density residential boundary to the East, you provide a more adequate transition between the commercial areas and low density multi-family and single-family property. The land use element of the Comprehensive Plan provides policies intended to be a general guide to land use decision making. The proposed rezone is consistent with certain goals, objectives and policies outlined in the "Policy Element" of the Renton Comprehensive Plan. Those policies identified in the "Policy Element" that are particularly applicalbe to multi-family residential development are: 4.A.1. "Housing densities and types to suit a variety of family sizes, age groups, life styles, and income levels should be encouraged. " 4.C.3. "Multi-family dwellings and mobile home parks should be located near arterial streets to assume adequate access. 4.C.5. "Medium or high density multi-family dwellings should be a buffer between low density multi-family residendial and more intensive uses. " 4.C.6. "To provide for efficiency of access, utilities, and open space, areas of high residential density should be geographically concentrated and not spread indiscriminately. " 4.C. 8. "Multi-family dwellings and mobile home parks should be located near employment and shopping centers. " Site design and development concepts prepared for this rezone assure consistency with the Renton Comprehensive Plan policies and emphasize City goals of locating multi-family residential housing in serviced areas. The proposed project will be a buffer between the low density single-family homes to the North and the commercial uses on N.E. 4th Street. In addition, the proposal is located near a major arterial and employment/shopping areas, and will offer affordable residential housing. AREA - SPECIFIC POLICIES: - NORTHEAST RENTON Northeast Quadrant Planning Area Comprehensive Plan Policies applicable to this site include: B. Implementing Policies Land Use Objective: The Land Use Element of the Northeast Quadrant Comprehensive Plan is intended to be a general guide to land use decision making. Policies: 1) Land use decision within the Northeast Quadrant should be consistent with available transportation, community facilities, and utilities. 3) Land development should progress logically from West to East on the East Renton Plateau and from South to North in the Kennydale and Hazelwood areas. 4) To help balance home to work traffic trips the Land Use Plan strongly endorses employment opportunities in the vicinity of N.E. 44th and Interstate 405 and the vicinity of N.E. 4th and Duvall Avenue N.E. 5) An Office Park land use classification should be developed consistent with the following design criteria: a. Provide for a transitional land use intensity consistent with both commercial and residential areas and the natural environment. 6) Approximately 60 acres of office park should be accommodated along N.E. 4th generally between Union and Duvall in accordance with Land Use Policy #3 above. 7) Where appropriate design can be developed, mixed residential and business uses should be accommodated in commercial land use designations. Commercial Development Objective: Policies: 1) Commercial uses developed along N.E. 4th Street and along Sunset Boulevard N.E. should be oriented within shopping centers or other sizeable complexes. 5) Multiple family residential uses should be encouraged as buffers between commercial uses and less intensive uses. The Northeast Quadrant Comprehensive plan policies indicate that development should occur from West to East on the Plateau and that employment opportunities should occur in the vicinity West of the subject property near N.E. 4th and Duvall Avenue. Commercial development along N.E. 4th should occur with in shopping centers or other sizable complexes. Multi-family should be encouraged as a buffer between commercial and less intensive use. The proposed development of the Crown Pointe property complies with these plan policies. The proposed development of the Crown Pointe property for medium density multi-family residential uses under the R-3 zone classification is consistant with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. GREENBELT - Comprehensive Plan Land Use Descriptions The subject property is bisected by a 200 foot wide Power Transmission easement. The Comprehensive Plan Map designates the easement as Greenbelt. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies are: An area intended for open space, recreation, very low density residential uses (generally at a density of less than one unit per gross acre) , agriculture or other compatible low intensity use. Greenbelt areas are characterized by severe topographic, ground water, slope instability, soil or other physical limitations that make the areas unsuitable for intensive development. Provisions for public enjoyment of greenbelt areas are encouraged; however, greenbelt designations do not imply the right of public access. Comprehensive Plan Greenbelt Policies Utility Easements and Rights-of-way: Major electricity, water and gas transmission line easements and rights-of-way located outside of Renton' s downtown/industrialized area should be designated as greenbelts. These linear features function as visual open spaces that break up surrounding land uses. A limited number of other low intensity uses may be permitted within utility greenbelts. These include agriculture; residential open space; recreational activities and facilties; parking associated with adjoining land uses - provided that no more than 25% of the greenbelt area is covered with impervious surfaces; production of natural resources provided that the area is rehabilitated consistent with the greenbelt definition; roadways and streets - provided that any public street aligned parallel with the greenbelt should be developed as a boulevard. No structures should be developed within utility greenbelts, with the exception of recreational structures and utility structures associated with the easement or right-of-way. To the extent that natural vegetation is compatible with utility uses, the undeveloped portions of designated greenbelts should be maintained in an undisturbed condition. IC5. Areas or strips of open space should be retained and enhanced to serve as buffers. IC6. Open space areas should not be considered as a reserve for non-open space uses. If an overriding public purpose requires the use of open space land, a comparable replacement site should be provided. IC7. Multiple uses of open space land should be encouraged, provided that the uses are compatible and adequate area is provided for each function. The 200 foot wide BPA easement crossing the property is intended for low intensity use. The proposed Crown Pointe development would propose use of the easement for parking and landscaping. The development of the property will provide both active and passive recreation opportunities on site together with landscaped open space and buffering. OWNERS FORM Celt O FEHTON SCHEDULE A i 11 VI D Number Date of Policy Amount of uiPai4 56818-0 September 8 , 1982 at 11 : 03 a .m. 757 #000 00,_;r iNG C.i 'T, 1 .Name of Insured: CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership. 2. The estate or interest in the land herein and which is covered by this policy is: Fee simple 3 . The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: As on Schedule A, page 2 , attached. 4 . The land herein described is encumbered by the following mortgage or trust deed, and assignments: only the mortgages or trust deeds, if any, shown in Schedule B hereof . 5. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows : As on Schedule A, page 3, attached. SCHEDULE A 56818-0 Page 2 3. THE ESTATE OF INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESTED IN: GERTRUDE TORGINE CASPERSON, as her separate estate, as to Parcel A. ETHEL J. DANIELSON, as her separate estate, an undivided one-half interest and LLOYD A. JONES and BARBARA D. JONES, husband and wife, an undivided one-half interest , as to Parcel B. CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Limited Partnership, as to Parcel C. Schedule A 56818-D Page 3 5.THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : PARCEL A The west half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the south 180 feet thereof; TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress and egress along the east 30 feet of the south 180 feet of the west half of therof uartesofgSectiono9,tTownshipe23tNorth, eRanget5e southeast East,f W.M. , quarter in King County, Washington. PARCEL B The east half of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the south 180 feet of the west 250 feet in width thereof; EXCEPT the south 30 feet for road. PARCEL C The westerly 30 feet of the_ south 180 feet of the east half he arter of the suarterthwest gofrter of Sectiont9 , Townshipt23u of southeastt q North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the south 30 feet for road. OWNERS FORM SCHEDULE B Policy Number 56818-0 This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: The mortgages, if any, referred to in Item 4 of Schedule A. 1 .AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES: FOR: IN FAVOR OF: Harry E. Schellert and Mary Schellert DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT January 13, 1936 RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: 2882376 AFFECTS: The west 15 feet of Parcel A 2.AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES: FOR: Transmission line installation IN FAVOR OF: Defense Plant Corporation, a corporation DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT June 1 , 1944 RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: 3391113 AFFECTS : The easterly portion of Parcel A 3. Subject to the right of the public in and to all Public roads and to existing pipes and conduits , irrigation and drainage lines, bridges and canals and easement and rights of way of public utilities as disclosed by instrument recorded on June 1 , 1944 under Recording rcel ANumber 3391113. AFFECTS : 4 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Clifford-Tullock Company, Inc. PURPOSE: Roadway purposes AREA AFFECTED: The west 15 feet of Parcel A DATED: January , 1944 RECORDED: January 17 , 1944 RECORDING NUMBER: 3395077 Said grantees have assigned their interest in said easement to Erwin R. Wonio as undersRe ordibg Numberm35242glorded on December 12 , continued) SCHEDULE B 56818-0 Page 2 5.AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES: FOR: A pole line IN FAVOR OF: Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, a California corporation DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT June 5 , 1946 RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: 3575612 AFFECTS:The description contained therein is not sufficient to determine its exact location within Parcel A herein described. 6.AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES: FOR: The right to install , maintain, replace, remove and use an electric line IN FAVOR OF: Puget Sound Power and Light Company DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT March 7 , 1961 RECORDED: 5259008 RECORDING NUMBER: The centerline of said AFFECTS : electric line to be located as now staked and constructed across Parcel A or as may be relocated by mutual consent 7 .AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES: FOR: A pipeline IN FAVOR OF: Olympic Pipe Line Corp. , a Delaware corporation DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT March 25 , 1961 RECORDED: 5715151 RECORDING NUMBER: 57 As to be constructed over , AFFECTS :across and through Parce l A 8.EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: President Park Development Co. , a limited partnership PURPOSE: Utility and road purposes AREA AFFECTED: Over and across the west 15 feet of Parcel A DATED: July 2, 1973 RECORDED: September 25 , 1973 RECORDING NUMBER: 7309250365 Said easement contains a provision for bearing equal cost of maintenance, repair or reconstruction of said common road by the common users. continued) SCHEDULE B 56818-O Page 3 9 .AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES: FOR: Transmission line IN FAVOR OF: Puget Sound Power and Light Co. DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT March 30 , 1943 RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: 3300057 AFFECTS :The description contained therein is not sufficie determine its exact location within the property herein described. 10. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES: FOR: Transmission line IN FAVOR OF: Defense Plant Corporation DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT September 14 , 1943 RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: 3335068 AFFECTS: As now stated on the ground, over, across upon and/or adjacent to Parcel B and C and other proeprty Subject, however, to the rights of the public in and to all public roads and subject also to existing pipes and conduits, irrigation and drainage lines, bridge and canals and easements and right of way of public utilities. 11 . AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES: Pole line IN FAVOR OF: FOR: pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT June 5 , 1946 RECORDED: 3575611 RECORDING NUMBER: Parcels B and C AFFECTS : The description contained therein is not sufficient to de- termine its exact location within the property herein described. 12. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES: FOR: Pipe line IN FAVOR OF: Olympic Pipe Line Company, a Delaware corporation DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT March 25, 1964 RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: 5715152 continued) SCHEDULE B 56818-0 Page 4 AFFECTS: Within the boundaries of an existing easement now held by the City of Seattle, formerly held by the Bonneville Power Administration Transmission Line of Parcels B and C 13. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES: FOR: Electric line IN FAVOR OF: Puget Sound Power & Light Company DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT November 23, 1966 RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: 6111149 AFFECTS : The center line of said electric line to be located as now staked across the west 20 feet of north 50 feet lying easterly of transmission line easement of Parcel B 14 . AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES: FOR: Pipeline IN FAVOR OF: Olympic Pipe Line Company, a Delaware corporation DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED:. September 19 , 1973 RECORDING NUMBER: 7309190367 AFFECTS: Portion of Parcel B and other property 15. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES: FOR: Pipeline IN FAVOR OF: Olympic Pipe Ling Company, a Delaware corporation DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED: May 3 , 1974 RECORDING NUMBER: 7405030409 AFFECTS: Portion of Parcel C 16. RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY: Reserving and excepting from said lands so much or such portions thereof as are or may be mineral lands or contain coal or iron, and also the use and the right and title to the use of such surface ground as may be necessary forminingoperationsandtherightofaccesstosuchreservedands ordiron, for thee purpose dof exploring ,s, incluin l developing containing coal and or working the same. 234123RECORDINGNUMBER: continued) SCHEDULE B 56818-0 Page 5 Said instrument was amended by agreement dated May 5, 1954 , recorded May 28 , 1954 , under Recording Number 4450143, as follows: EXCEPTING and reserving unto the grantor , its successors and assigns, forever, all minerals, including coal and iron upon or in said lands, TOGETHER WITH use of such of the surface as may be necessary for exploring for and mining or otherwise extracting and carrying away the same; but the grantor, its successors and assigns,ns, shall pay to the present legal owners , or to their heirs , successors or assigns, the market value at the time mining operations are commenced of such portions of the surface as may be used for such operations, or injured thereby, including any improve- ments thereon. 17. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONShe THEREOf Feattle BETWEEN: AND: Olympic Pipe Line Company DATED: February 13, 1975 RECORDED: February 14 , 1975 RECORDING NUMBER: 7502140608 COPY ATTACHED. 18. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: SELLER: Gertrude Torgine Casperson, as her separate estate PURCHASER: Frank Tolomei and Attilia Tolomei , his wife DATED: August 6 , 1974 RECORDED: August 16 , 1974 RECORDING NUMBER: 7408160284 EXCISE TAX RECEIPT NUMBER: Parcel- 272814 AFFECTS: PURCHASER'S INTEREST WAS ASSIGNED AND SAID PREMISES CONVEYED BY WARRANTY DEED AND PURCHASERS ' ASSIGNMENT OF REAL ESTATE CONTRACT: DA August 31 , 1982 RECORRDED: COD: September 8 , 1982 RE RECORDING NUMBER: 8209080328 ASSIGNEE: Crown Pointe Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership EXCISE TAX RECEIPT NUMBER(S) : E0687667 continued) SCHEDULE B 56818-0 Page 6 19. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND tCCONDITJ. IONSSielTHEREOF: her SELLER:separate estate, an undivided one-half interest and Lloyd A. Jones and Barbara D. Jones, his wife , an undivided one-half interest PURCHASER: Frank Tolomei and Attilia Tolomei , husband and wife , as trustees for a partnership to be formed at a later date DATED: September 14 , 1978 RECORDED: September 29 , 1978 RECORDING NUMBER: 7809290662 EXCISE TAX RECEIPT NUMBER: E-498412B AFFECTS: Parcel PURCHASER'S INTEREST WAS ASSIGNED AND SAID PREMISES CONVEYED BY WARRANTY DEED AND PURCHASERS ' ASSIGNMENT OF REAL ESTATE CONTRACT: August 31 , 1982 DATED: RECORDED: September 8, 1982 RECORDING NUMBER: 8209080328 ASSIGNEE: Crown Pointe Limited Partnership, a limited partnership EXCISE TAX RECEIPT NUMBER(S ) : E0687667 20. TRANSCRIPT OF JUSTICE COURT Barbara D. Jones and her JUDGMENT AGAINST:husband IN FAVOR OF: Creditors Services Inc. FOR: 78 . 08 KING COUNTY JUDGMENT NO: 117521 SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO: 810303 JUSTICE COURT ENTRY: March 30, 1976 ATTORNEY FOR JUDGMENT V. A. Retacco CREDITOR: 21 . JUDGMENT AGAINST: Bernice Potts , Lloyd Jones , John Doe Potts, Jane Doe Jones, and occupants IN FAVOR OF: Henry Matthews FOR: 1 , 690 .00 ENTERED: April 27 , 1976 KING COUNTY JUDGMENT NO: 118786 SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO: 808786 ATTORNEY FOR JUDGMENT Steven J. Fields CREDITOR: continued) I SCHEDULE B 6818-0 Page 7 22. TRANSCRIPT OF JUSTICE COURT Lloyd Jones and Jane DoeJUDGMENTAGAINST: Jones, husband and wife, and their marital community doing business Timber Cafe, formerly known as Mr. Gene' s Pastie Machine IN FAVOR OF: Benzion' s Food Service Specialists FOR: 277 .90 KING COUNTY JUDGMENT NO: 177274 SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO: 79-2-03003-1 JUSTICE COURT ENTRY: August 29 , 1979 ATTORNEY FOR JUDGMENT Charles S. Helm CREDITOR: he NOTE: The lien of stordwith9mentLloyddAPendsJonesponandtBarbaratDty of the judgment deb Jones, husband and wife. 23. PENDING ACTION IN KING COUNTY: SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER: 81-2-11092-4 BEING AN ACTION FOR: Injunctive relief and damages PLAINTIFF: Michael N. Read, et al DEFENDANT: Mike Mastro et al ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF: John T. Petrie Notice of Lis Pendens recorded July 8 , 1981 under Recording Number 8107080440 ; however, said instrument does not contain a Superior Court Cause Number. 24. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF URITY p' EST OF LEASES AND RENT GRANTOR: Crown Pointe Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership TRUSTEE: Chicago Title Insurance Company BENEFICIARY: Seattle Trust & Savings Bank AMOUNT: 500 ,000 .00 DATED: September 2 , 1982 RECORDED: September 8, 1982 RECORDING NUMBER: 8209080329 The amount now secured by said Deed of Trust and the terms upon which thsamethecanholder discharge indebtedness assumed sec red, be ascertained from continued) Schedule B 56818-0 Page 8 25. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT AND/OR DEED GIVEN AS SECURITY AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Crown Point Limited Partnership, a limited partnership GRANTEE: Seattle Trust & Savings Bank AMOUNT: 500 ,000.00 DATED: September 7 , 1982 RECORDED: September 8, 1982 RECORDING NUMBER: 8209080330 AFFECTS: Parcels A and B END OF SCHEDULE B Countersigned: authorized ignatory Schedule B of this Policy consists of 8 pages D-1826 ml 1.1 , (c1 7-A, el`dr ccaurumn',.,' 1'1/11r1•2 11./,1 11.1-1._ LV21IMrilLS,Ki o ...7 1,/, I• 214' I -' --- Mil 11.. --I ,' i J./. I t iyit ..• ...:rtm --':,./ 44 ....-- 114- kA 1 - I,I i . ,,_ i e.,e3A, .: ., ____. ___1____ ..- x44.. '-•s4I11' a il - M 6 ilII 1 iit/ i ,.11 II i 1 ' 4 1 li nil .4110621Lli 4 Elguit,..4-ik,_,w4cv1T c 1,.., tlyi.liikire:N1F..11 1 Iifs 1 i ji ' riauirlitrie.1.11i" Is_____witrei%--i-----,-7-.4:,-,-..--=::---- ' cores . 1 )1 21 1•?ValiL.14 - \lr i o t r v A,-, , i • ___,,,.. r--;-----11. '' ,,iali 11. 1; 6 idiltro 1), lit A i 1 vv. 229 229 0 149 1 I 11-118 _,e4111/44. 115111. , rftli.J.I 1 1 ior ,4- •••I•1.• J ' r• 1.6-919 P,Ass• V I 1 N / Y a a I I II i ao 2.9,..: • yap IIPOf / AY s 0 i ; ; ,1 i 1.L7 -"-al_ _nr---‘1,., Jure'-• I O.01.10 Silt JO NOUN.I I 1 , ,: ' 1,- ---.-----' ][ it)L •r-1 11.0 111a P*.o.•••111.rtata 0•11.4 I I EllI : . \\--)4 J-11111 111114'111 i 14.17:: 1,::s LI.=7, I .,,•I ._ii- i.,,--, ii ; ,, la .0.ILI 1,Th-Wreral. .„....•..... a ICIP, so, ,o0 I I / ; 1 de 1111 III ,I7A. 1111111111' 1.11.01)Silt In 1 4I1 1 g W 1.1^1../^. rH i )1,,_ •,, , i i , , / la I.•ett•.01 L-4 Irl it c art ge”ir;lav I, 1 t 1 / L4- ing" z i 1 1..., 1 I glillgar Om 2s. 29.9 2p7 1I 1 A/AI; I. .14// •60:, 1 1 tho-14,2 41. c•i":e:,"?..11.r Il1 I / • II •,;"::',7,.?":.i:01.1,,i I ' in poer,n 00. 4 rilt -,-rill. *me I I'; ._:- alinr, ,1 , i, 1 ; ! ; ,,,t- 1 non vr•" *Ole lis '' 7 944 1, 911 I, k s 4, araara 11' 11,1 SalaIIF.(, •I "/ i ---- V 111/41 21.11Pei1iII1ili , 1,1-i ! ply ;0111il J.14141/...10 2 1.1 lit V..0.„TM1.0,•41a0.1„ag:2:1.70011,310 gas:.L: ... I 1 I i ir Mr1,041,'"."-tIr. I , I i 1 i I 1 4t 1 1 Jill '-1-11" 1 fl_i ) 11 1111 i,, i1 1 1 1 1 1 1-1-1-J.-)1:-9----- -fti-1-1-J.. r.„- , ,..- i . I • 5-9N-G 1 1.1 OC OC.O..11„LanIn00,11 1 4 Zq:L7Z.7." ..T..4 "......" g r M V 31 I ) I /1 11111.1.0.1 10 30,011 1..10..1/11 m•I"...a 9.99 i----v., CS:I iN4. ,-•ij Ill kWh" „I -- --...----_--- ----_.--'i_1- -1-4_44,1--H1.1 11'9 .‘. 1.1 i...u.•alsom It 111411.01..4 1,1,10......le I t, 1 10 1,1„..1 10 1,0„.....CIO C•I,OC l•PO 1 '/ \ '..- --. 5.•_., NI 4 a.jiiMIR 9.................._ _-_-__:::::: 9 0 ii 41 co.......1.1.1101.11 l•Ir.,.01/1 1.11.Q V"1-1:-Nren ja c -0 0g73„..Z.° ° 91-4 1••"r--cr---I--*-1--r-- ,4.H.PrI 61.1,1111.1.99,91 iataL-I -s." 43.4 i \ 1\ 00114(111.4'Mai a...tr, alit- 0 3- J, R. 1- ENDING • OF FILE Fig nne flo7 - 84