No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA84-073LAND USE UNIT MIX TOTAL SITE AREA 422,532 S.F. (9.7 ACRES) 93 A UNITS (667 S.F.I: 62,0311 S.F. 50' BUILDING COVERAGE 48,051 S.F. (11%) 36 B UNITS (842 S.F.): 30,312 S.F. 4,7 PAVED AREAS 100,430 S.F. (24%) 57 C UNITS (948 S.F.): 54,036 S.F. 1O so' //' Z—=__ \j „o. CONCRETE WALKS 4,010 S.F. ( 1%)186 TOTAL UNITS 146,379 S.F. Il/ // f/ti RECREATION AREA 10,800 S.F. ( 3%) DENSITY: 20.2 UNITS / ACRE no•-.\ 11 /// ///r :_--- -_''\— _ o•OPEN SPACE 259,241 S.F. (61%) i//,//// // ' / a \'\\./ I 1 /^ ,. / // r'//// ) / i- fat,,i`°.I` I^``_— i/r/////// // M PARKING 7 i / \ TOTAL PARKING 1.5:1 279 STALLS i Jr— / / / 1 / l.,i4 it I I\ .o I J I 11 I / // / '•/ 4, 1 gp w CENTERLINE or 1\\ ...,, `- 1 \__'`- i I \ 1 1 1 1 'j, • , 1 11 0: \ram\ r n/ if.r V' 1II 1I // 11III // ///; , j I ; al,- i i _ — \\ jtioto; I II IIIli///////// in \ / : ,"" ra Yptiotix 4: 0,w- ' IIV/ Ii•4i i\ 41 ; J oI ® I i p q 1.: 1, ,/ ® kIlli'I I O4:: 00.., fffi AA 506 e •. 1i . , 1\.. vi iii,:iiiiiiiin:\\\ Iii\\II\u:ii\ttlii,J Ilq I J 1 8 oioo fi i1 Cilliu.r4ii. 4, e1140/°°46111tr.... IN,„ 1 S' IN'70 i 1 i; /-I ' 041 Ilex.,'' l Z iliTilooicoliA 4.4....01%. 411rl SITE PLAN LAKESIDE APARTMENTS o o o° I A Lincoln Property Company Apartment Community EV,..°._„_.. MILBRANDT ARCHITECTS i C.P.S. 1'-'..-- 1-'711111111111L''...... ------...._____....."------"------ 11111r;--. .- ri I r \ v.,... 4-7-2, 17v-----3, 7___. - . 1 4" fr, ,_ , , k,,, , i" iir- r N ,)7----1 iii (, 1\,........._ j_1)1iLi400, 0,40 i N77-, !rt, -----„, r. _,,,,ii ( v/„..)_,.....,. 34/ 7 00 A .1;, ___.„\_ ( \_ of it ,-)/,: 44, ------7------,% ___. , 11111 07 Iz, u. t,L0' : or. 74\\\„____ ob,,,,//1_, ri N" . L , .. __. ., ,/, lilt -- i.,s,• 24,_ „ .42, - 01,0 ___ 1 I _:: . j ',\, . 44 '4114111 11"qak - t 7 , , t!,.eiv A„,._ z - j'_ ---, ,,, ___ • 11 Or 7r 1 359401 I tit, 1 144c 7 -. i /-- rN . . , 3,.. I ., -..C., Iif11111V , A 35-, to\ 1 r '' -- L ter------- -- — LI"SLAM RTY CO r naco se cu,s .w.n 2zo aiiwve,Washpo .eve ii-_ l REZONE S/TE PLANi........ megift b I rac—weu.a nlE IuiTi-FART QI J` 1 c.n^wn9-MJt3raN BBO01 1 _ —_ -_— i __ "'-"! 8/ --Avw B./ BOP[— 0/0 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3878 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM PUBLIC DISTRICT (P-1) AND RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-1) TO. R-3) (LINCOLN PROPERTIES - R-073-84 ) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Public District (P-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Building and Zoning Department on or about June 18, 1984 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon September 28 , 1984 and continued to October 12, 1984, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residence District (R-3) as hereinbelow specified: subject to the findings, conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated September 28 , 1984 and October 12 , 1984 ; the Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Said property being located at the East of Lake Washington Blvd. North, approximately at the 2000 block. ) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about November 30 , 1984 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections, Receiving No. 8501030434 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 14th day of January, 1985 . Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR thisl4th day of January, 1985 . Barbara Y. 5hinpocn, Mayor Approved as to form: i? Lawrence J. Waten, City Attorney Date of Publication: January 21 , 1985 EXHIBIT "A" Li no)iri ,PropertIes R-073-814 Legal desi.ription of property (If more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). I r rc 157 and 1SR , ('. n Hi] 1 man' c I.akP [Tashi nunn C;ardPn n l: Fder _ Dior is i oa no 5, situate in Wing County,, Washingtou Tracts 340 , 341 and 343 , and Vacated Tracts 342 and 359 . ALL in C. D. Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden No. 5 . as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats , on page 83 . records of King County ; TOGETHER WITH that portion of Lake View Blvd. (104th Ave . S .E.) vacated by Order of the County Commissioners , which attached thereto by operation of law; EXCEPT that portion of vacated Tract 359 conveyed to King County for road by 'deed recorded under Recording No. 1029408 ; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. j o 1.. Ih..•A .. : f •Ar 1 1 1/., n. 1 . t/ / 11' I•• 1,. 111 Il ,' , ,',' i•'• I 1_2 )t ' 1 r 1 C._.. - A11 Iw1v in_ •1 r r'I, 11 1l17 1„ 17• ./ t . ! Y n 4 11,, .`REet 9P 17-SO-+R06101.11001110„. a to- 4: c o.' S I .; 'w11. LOT B ,.,'.t• , 10, a „ 61 t . Lor ear j1w Lot I, y 1 o I ` j r 27 1 Iv Ze ;A4: . •• ,,. re hi ,oi,., •. 4.t150K1", ^ • - ir1.Y -.. 1 J r, DoJ NV 11111 /,4..e a 1l\ 1-1. -. f•e!•a=— ,° co G n Lf.o nA (70) /8 roA a2 A7AII b /oT C n+ lM ~`. f1, , . n1,1 +` 4' I. M 1.. VI'a .. 1 1,1 hi) 017 40 fA7 te VN9A ... ' . , rH-oJ.yw ul A0..1 ti-s-Ua_ u. I to C r°, , 1'011003240'131 I, RENSP 118-80- • ` I 4 e` lW. Otit4 f a •I4 8AC N 6i,v I.Lot A Lol B P A sj hi"I A 49 eV i1 05 I I) ,Ile/ . AI. a-ss. 4 03Zi4P)Z o4f,S. E. 100TH !'sI•°o/.0•J... . lNrnMfl ••I 01144 ,•Br) PEN SP 19 -79 Al 79. 10 OI6 I 1 ti LOT ',,,J•. G I07 2 9 LOT 3 $s1 +' 2S I s y .r_o +41. „,r. ,. .. I'Ir ,.<,nA q L. I y0 I I • i i,,e. re V • w Ac N 1 I c el /3O ` 1 c 0 1,v OJA 1...N.• •,1/4 it iL41 e.,;'a ii, 4 c \.i' C:fpL1 • M T N 6 n IA EJ \) r s....1 1 W a` yi Isa AL Z I)4 Q t7 I i o N fQ—.._;---- --J ".F- N A I /S O f A I o A O I a . l nWtv rI j a r I 8I F.}• 1- C(; l 2 I'- O 0 I i. M 0 ,0 ,:. a 1h 4,• I k. t , Ii I t10' s. t c) i IA`( 0 e ,,-' I.- I ,c. c.) k . I I ) g)) ,f I OZ 0 .. 1110 siys I 4s tle' . f ? loIOQ S. Io *___rJ 092T44 W-- ! I • 9,40 f JV, 45 -23 - 5 I t'a"ti"" U. J6.w:.+ .{r.7w+e spur- et.,;, Pr•Sha el• i f„r.Vdd• '4rortk• 1'' 3. 4I do 33 a JN'It Ai ‘ •y1:P" 3 s '' \\ 1aa• Mr•19 pt. 11 r' teal 042 4. - 1••''...• __.\\ . * . ....t.grz,,,: t ( ckt,,. 44,44:? 1 AV E r' e it; 11 t • illia \: O 1• N ra f a° a.1mi 7c.•n R \ ,\ ... pl.' 9•1 j7,' 19 .. 7.• \ \ 0 \,,,, -..., 11,04 lie V 11, w V o s 1 rrI 47j28 I er ) a ^( n, 6 le F--- C.. • 4514 c 1 yfe eV ill • d`y Ln .• era A.;'„ Y y. ago R• • 14.1'----'mi 4 4'ti,0 3.. 1 :: a - Z y5 355 117.7a _ 1 J°i"' a N. ra dl v I IS a3f v• ——b:, y' rmwl^ -0 is s'! l IIc st y,a el- diSs*at' feu11%1111kti K`1YZ 01. :7.,'1A • Og 12l . J4% 4 0 \.`1,1,71. u .. S I of N i i 3AP.. ' Itt 4* .‘ 41•4.'"c...35 Cl.. a izi to—. C1 40 INk y '' c:16 iS / a G 20 o \ ih , OO i ISli, 10a,...,. ,0. , 0\1 00 lV ANTON BUILDING PERMIT 4 & ZONING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION Q- 7D-e2A 40 C)C'-1 ` -' 40O 1 RESS OF PROPERTY ( , 4 /4 L 2 IF NEW CONSTRUCTION, THIS DEPARTMENT WILL ASSIGN ADDRESS) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION TO BE PERFORMED C I;r(7t 3 E i`C' -:r '7 + r"tl' J Xiitit VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION IS: q Nt'-I '-76;4?(' 1 ' KING COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER FOR PROPERTY MAY BE FOUND ON PROPERTY TAX STATEMENT OF TITLE PAPERS) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLEASE SUBMIT ON SEPARATE $ x 11 SHEET OF PAPEP (G lit-e'Li )Pc i" OWNER OF PROPERTY n ' ric kk— 4- E5 b. ' :,-Ai:Inca '7%i} <,- co L t h C'hf i I7i rNf HONE (2C4) 4(5 S - (/4 13 STREET ADDRESS' (IC(? _a-- e i' c44i ' ?c--c= CITY/STATE 1i-NC I;...:y' L 1 ZIP cl ,(' / CONTACT PERSON _ ?(0t c>,- y-vI'C- PHONE 1S"s !'` r CONTRACTOR /: i'->• P .C -Vic', PHONE `tS STREET ADDRESS //7 60 1)t o6 )1 2O CITY/STATE fo IIt'Vw',t. i. ZIP W"I CONTRACTOR'S STATE LICENSE NUMBER Pi-; /)/C ,I- 7 ? 3 K tti) RENTON BUSINESS LICENSE NUMBER y / £/ ' TAX NUMBER (7— 4CC) 2 `/ :57'2 IF TENANT SPACE., LIST: TENANT NAME, TYPE OF BUSINESS, SUITE NUMBER) Use District Const Type BId Sq Ft Elec Service Flood PI Elev Low Fl Elev Flood Proof El Sewer/Septic Vacant Site Site Cov Shell of Bld Sprinkler Reg CO Required Temporary Temp Days Revocable Rev Days Spec Restr Occ Group Occ Load Height Limit Dwelling Count Perk Count Story Count Misc Code I Misc Code 2 I certify that the information on this application furnished by me is true and correct and that the applicable requirements of the CITY OF RENTON will be met. I understand that this application is valid for six months from the application date. If a permit is not issued during this time period, the application will become void. This application does not constitute a permit to work. Work is not to commence until building permit is posted on premises where work is to be performed. Work in public rights-of-way and/or utility easements are not authorized under this application. PERMIT FEE $_ INVESTIGATION FEE $ OTHER FEE $ PLAN CHECK $X DRAINA PLAN CHECK $ 5+S S-f SEPA FEE $RECEIPT ii 7L DATE 5-2 "," SIGNAI URE _ r , .-' /'> 4' f? . . 0 K ()7 5 q OF R4, i 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o ! rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 9ti O CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500O, gTFD SEPt . O P Jaruary 28 , 1985 Mr. John Phillips 22C1 Western Ave. Suite 555 SeEttle, WA 98121 Sutject: Rezone Ordinance No. 3878 Dear Mr. Phillips : The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of January 14 , 1985 , adopted Ordinance No. 3878 changing the zoning classification of certain properties within the City from Public District (P-1 ) and Residence District (R-1) to R--3) (Lincoln Properties Rezone 073-84 ) . As a condition of the rezone a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants was required, filed with King Co. Records and Elections and received recording number 8501030434 . A copy of the Ordinance and Restrictive Covenants is enclosed. Ve::y truly yours, CT"Y OF RENTON Ma:Kine E. Motor City Clerk en3losures cc : Hearing Examiner S/n 1 !uT E RECD F DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT WHEREAS, MARJORIE LOTTO, individually and as personal representative of the estate of M. W. Lotto, deceased, and Thomas H. Phinney as personal representative of the estate of Anna Phinney, deceased (collectively "Owners") are owners of the real property located in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; WHEREAS, the Owners desire to impose the following Restrictive Covenant running with the land as to use, Tr present and future, of the described real property; Cl NOW, THEREFORE, the Owners hereby establish, grant and impose a Covenant running with the described real property with respect to the use by the undersigned, their grantees, OD successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: 1 . Site Plan Review. Improvement of the real pro- perty described herein shall be subject to Site Approval as set forth in City of Renton Ordinance No. 3454 and the application procedures attached as Exhibit B and incorpo- rated herein by this reference as the same exist on the date of this Covenant. If during the Duration of this Covenant, the City of Renton amends, modifies the ordinance or appli- cation procedures in any matter to impose less restrictive recuirements on the development of or constructions upon the de=cribed property then the benefit of such less restrictive recuirements shall inure to the benefit of the Owners, their grantees, successors, heirs and assigns. 2 . Duration. This Covenant shall remain in full force and effect for at least a ten-year period and shall automatically expire on December 31 , 1994 . If prior to expiration of this Covenant, improvements which have re- ceived Site Approval are completed, this Declaration of Restrictive Covenant shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect without the necessity of any further documentation. The Owners may request the City of Renton execute the following release for purposes of clear- ing title to the described property; and if so requested, the City of Renton shall execute the same: SAMPLE RELEASE THE CITY OF RENTON does hereby release and forever terminate that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenant dated this day of 1984 , King County Recording No.in connection with the use and development of the property SAMPLE RELEASE CONT. described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorpo- rated herein by this reference. CITY OF RENTON Attest: By City Clerk Its NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT] Cn C' 3 . Enforcement. This Declaration of Restrictive QCovenant is specifically enforceable by proper legal proce- dures in the Superior Court of King County by either the p City of Renton and Owners, their grantees, successors, heirs Cand assigns. OD MARJO IE LOT O, Individually MARJQP.IE LOTTO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of M. W. Lotto, deceased iL71/ t- Thomas H. Phinney as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anna Phinney, deceased STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me MARJORIE LOYTO, known to me to be the individual that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS zky hand and official seal hereto affixed this day of . (4-1984. M r y, ' L(g 7 1. iQ p s, 'A NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State Was ington, residing at t STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me MARJORIE LOTTO, Personal Representative of the Estate of M. W. Lotto,Tr c7 known to me to be the individual that executed the within oand foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed CD the same as her free and voluntary act and deed on behalf of O the Estate of M. W. Lotto, for the uses and purposes therein r1 mentioned. O GO WITNESS my- hand and official seal hereto affixed this day of J r-- o-C ,., 1984 . t . .; 2\4;--ti 7 i' I -Zia. • t ; o ., NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the 3.. rL'1\C State &f Washington, residing t at 1Ce 1,. 4- , ' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me Thomas H. Phinney Personal Representative of the Estate of Anna Phinney, known to me to be the individual that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed on behalf of the Estate of Anna Phinney, for the uses and pu-poses therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed this 3&Ith day of November 1984 . ce--e--- Z:2_ - -2/tee,<,--/..;3— N TARY PUBLIC in and for the 1.. +,, State of Washington, residing a Y . M t at Kent l itC, EXHIBIT "A" Lincoln Properties R-073-84•. r, izr Legal description of property (It more space is required, attach a separate sheet). nts 157 and 158 C I) Hi 1 lman ' c Lake [•Iashingrnn Garden Fdcn_ ni ~ri c i nn no 5 situare in King County , WasbiDgrn I Tracts 340 , 341 and 343 , and Vacated Tracts 342 and 359 , ALL in C. D. Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden No . 5 , as pet plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats , on page 83 , records of King County ; TOGETHER WITH that portion of Lake View Blvd. (104th Ave . S . E.) vacated by Order of the County Commissioners , which attached thereto by operation of law; EXCEPT that portion of vacated Tract 359 conveyed to King County for road by -deed recorded under Recording No. 1029408 ; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. Exhibit B 1. LTY OF RENTL. N BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION PROCEDURE Conditional Use Permit, Site Approval, Special Permit, and Temporary Permit The Land Use Hearing Examiner holds one regular public hearing each Tuesday at 9:00 a.m., in the Municipal Building, Council Chambers. Applications to be considered at the public hearing must be filed with and must be found complete and accepted by the Building and Zoning Department at least twftnty-one (21) days prior to the he?rinc. The applicant Is requested to gil' be present at the public hearing meeting. O REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING APPLICATION C7 gel The appi opriate filing fee Is to be paid to the City Finance Department after the application is checked and accepted by the Building and Zoning Department. The fee Is not refundable. 1.Special Permit, Conditional Use Permit or Temporary Permit 300 plus $10 per acre. Site Approval 300 plus $ 5 per acre. Environmental Checklist Review Fee 650 5 or plus $1 per $10,000 for value less than O0 greater than $10,000. 2.7ix (6) copies of a completed application form, complete with signature, six (6) copies of the Affidavit of Ownership. 3.3Ix (6) completed copies of an Environmental Checklist Form. 4.aix (6) copies of a fully dimensioned site plan, to scale, showing: Subject property (all property lines dimensioned) and abutting streets (including widening). Location of the subject site with regards to the nearest street intersections, including Intersections opposite the subject property. c.Location of existing driveways adjacent to the subject property or on the opposite side of the street facing the subject property. d.All existing public improvements including, but not necessarily limited to: curb, gutter, and sidewalk; median islands; street trees; electroliers; fire hydrants; utility poles, etc., Including those adjacent to the subject site. e.Location of existing and proposed structures, parking, loading areas, driveways, existing on-site trees, existing or proposed fencing or retaining walls, free-standing signs, easements, refuse areas, and on-site lighting fixtures, utility junction boxes, or public utility transformers. f. Grading plan, if the proposed grade differential on-site will exceed twenty-four inches (24") from top of curb or adjacent properties. g.Site development plans/landscaping plans should include: location and size of planting areas location, size and spacing and names of proposed and existing shrubs, trees and groundcovers; decorative rockery or like landscape Improvements north arrow and scale names and location of abutting streets and public improvements planting details (soil mix, planting depth and width, and bark mulch depth) location of buildings, parking areas, and access existing and proposed contours 5. Six (L) copies of fully dimensioned architectural elevations of all buildings and structures inclu ling: a. Building materials and colors; including root, walls, or other enclosures. b. Fence or retaining wall materials, colors, and architectural design. c.Existing and proposed building signs, Including but not necessarily limited to: size, location, materials and colors. d.Architectural design of on-site lighting fixtures. e. Cross-section of roof showing location and height of roof top equipment such as, but not limited to; air conditioners, compressors, etc. 6. Super-'r: reductiogib of all plans submlttcd cr. either 11" or R'h" x 14". Xerox red'Actlons are not generally acceptable unless absolutely clear. 7. For Special Permits, Conditional Use Permits and Temporary Permits the burden of proof as 'o the appropriateness of the application lies with the applicant. Any such application cr shall be accompanied by a written description/ justification setting forth the reasons in favor of the applications. C7 8. Six (6) copies of vicinity map (1':200'). r4 NOTE: Photographs or manufacturers' brochures may be submitted to clarify the specifics of building materials, colors or any specific architectural detail proposed. ht(;tUvr.0 ihiJ uai JAN 3 is AN '8S is OF REuUKUS KING COUN1 Y c Revised 12/1982 NI i rnrm 181 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3878 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM PUBLIC DISTRICT (P-1) AND RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-1) TO R-3) (LINCOLN PROPERTIES - R-073-84) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Public District (P-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Building and Zoning Department on or about June 18 , 1984 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon September 28 , 1984 and continued to October 12, 1984 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residence District (R-3) as hereinbelow specified: subject to the findings, conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated September 28 , 1984 and October 12 , 1984 ; the Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Said property being located at the East of Lake Washington Blvd. North, approximately at the 200 block. ) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about November 30 , 1984 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections, Receiving No. 8501030434 and which said Covenants are hereby incorperated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 14th day of January, 1985 . Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR thisl4th day of January, 1985 . 1lBarbaraY.hinpoc , Mayor Approved as to form: O Lawrence J. Wa en, City Attorney Date of Publication: January 21 , 1985 EXHIBIT "A" Linccilri Properties R-073. 8W, Legal desc rlption of property (If more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). Trrc 157 and ISR_ (: D Hillman ' s % ke 1•lachingnn Carden Diizi °inn Pin S cituarn in Ki cF.ina p Tracts 340 . 341 and 343 , and Vacated Tracts 342 and 359 , ALL in C. D. Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden No. 5, as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats , on page 83 , records of King County ; TOGETHER WITH that portion of Lake View Blvd. (104th Ave . S .E.) vacated by Order of the County Commissioners , which attached thereto by operation of law; EXCEPT that portion of vacated Tract 359 conveyed to King County for road by 'deed recorded under Recording No. 1029408 ; Situate in the County of King. State of Washington. I v ,flat' N I SN.1. l ! l ' l 1" 16.•Nd '• d • j1, ! ., ? . ; 1 if, I.._.. _ `d_/'•.. /I1__ 11, I I,I I.; iv• ,1. I, A '' (I!,) )c A 1. y 65 s'nell.sv l7.S0•• off 1T LOTrq l+)r + Lc t2? • 6 C I.M N •LI Il •iI a _.1 1 p- q T\ t 110 /or f_ now tiv3, f`. c?.1; 1 ^ 4, C 4 •` }V 1470 Ire r^k r i' 0 69 03 2400j1 I, REN SP IIA AO I 81030 39007 kfj N A o r D N.'n.v x ya INTO ^.R 1,‘ 0Cbh., (-, JLO, ALotBl A 2' ' 33 A + AfP_Oro s ;r S. E. TOOTH T. RFN SO 19 -76 dF 79•-10 016 1 LOT I,p/• r 107 2w , LOT 3 .,• r6 1 I y • w'o II!' ,0. old., HI1 •a.ldl q I 41 I . I OIIIIw S ' •, ' T. 41..' 1. I 1 r .A Q 1/ JG : D s r- t it JJd t__--_lam! --i O 4 11) 2 r ,t c 'At„ I6,9) ... 1....1 '4„,,,, to l W N s o• 0 4 N 4Y_.__`____— --J "•,h- v tiy i3a 1I zhqq 4 \'" I qo 6 I rt... . .. 0 It I I . t `I i e) 1 k,., c, lzr i. I- I f35 S. II; , f. 1` M I fl. /11. t 1. f• 1 it • t• 1 %xi;• •1 ` v; i al4 a+, 0.. I IA , t;.3. 1 C 1 I1rlt° 1E1. / I S,,,° I I 1 1 I i#4" e Ne I a W N49•23.44 6V---- / QI I - 9.40 L___ y,-- W. 5 -23 - 5 i 1 I25 1 I -.' r ' •' sp. G. ei rr.V '4' 4rtv tlC. i1 1 346 dP 3 1 r _14. . i... Q., IC•";ota k 34 34 o' I—Al `` >tys>. c \` ••00. Tl A I. 1 1 la \ l, v yq4 c , O• snJ S 57 O. 9 -R \- `a' T i1 2 . M• ' f 1• f& 344 0 2 s s 6 i q rF Mi' jai ti) 1 13 1 rt N J 01 34 1 F I a*as* 17 AO' N 1 al • IS I 3 u y w tom .,,5 _) Zo t ' I 9 f A 1111111ft .... 7•0a9' ‘.1• - . as y•A •so a . .\ dt r 6 a,t.r- s t e ' rI2 4-'3.,,,. 4 1 : „,0'6I ; 0••\•-01It‘"CS'.-----'2 toy. 2:cit.!:e D 1 /414' 4 S• / Y C;;aq 4 Se 16 0-555 VJ l J Jla. ilk L IFS v, l al`'q•• 7.. 449 L zilimmitQkk • p. ,,,.„„, .•• t4ye 2 c N.k 5 4.0" '1, C • *, 0 51 A , kvalosti. ,.... Iti\:: ;„0,,,:'940, •... ..• 04'46 10 O \, 1.4 f,fy u 0 0R 3 N:gg: I et 15.,, •,Itt .0 a:5 ' 04 votxtitiatik 11 41.S4/ V ,: ,, . , , it, Cr At. ro\\,:c' -k.,_ 00 --' ' I. 4, 0 J 4-::., . iii,titalAw1hw' \ • • . zo \ (A•\ . 0. •••••'• i 4,::::„. ..... r.. 3;%,,„, ., ., • •Z 1 A Renton City Council 1/14/85 Page seven Ordinances and Resolutions Ordinance #3878 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of Lincoln Properties certain properties within the City of Renton from Public Rezone, R-073-84 District (P-1) and Residence District (R-1) to Multifamily Residential District (R-3) for Lincoln Properties, File No. R-073-84, east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North, approximately at the 200 block. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3879 An ordinance was read annexing 11 acres of property located Scott Annexation on the south and north sides of Sunset Boulevard NE and west of Union Avenue NE known as the Scott Annexation. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following ordinance for first reading and advancement to second and final reading: Tax Anticipation An ordinance was read authorizing the issuance of tax Notes anticipation notes for the purpose of paying City expenses pending the receipt of general city taxes and revenues; creating a note redemption fund; and providing for the sale of those notes to Ehrlich-Bober & Co. , Inc. of New York, New York. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE THIS ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. Ordinance #3880 Following second and final reading of the aforementioned Tax Anticipation ordinance, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, Notes COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: LID 328 Final An ordinance was read approving and confirming the assessments Assessment Roll and assessment roll of Local Improvement District No. 328 for 318,828.66 the construction and installation of curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, utility adjustments, storm drains and all necessary appurtenacnes thereto on Garden Avenue N. from N. 4th to N. 8th Street, Renton, King County, Washington; by doing all work necessary in connection therewith, levying and assessing the amounts therefor against the several lots, tracts, parcels of land and other property shown on said assessment roll as confirmed by the City Council ; and providing for the payment of such assessments into the Local Improvement Fund, District No. 328 of the City of Renton as created by Ordinance No. 3744. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Utility An ordinance was read amending portions of Section 3-241 , Title Connection III (Departments) and Section 8-717, Title VIII (Health and Charges Sanitation) of City Code regarding charges for property not previously assessed as it relates to utility connection charges. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Resolutions Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following resolution for reading & adoption: Resolution #2589 A resolution was read providing for the transfer of $37,872.00 1984 Budget from Street Fund Ending Fund Balance unto Street Fund - Street Adjustments Lighting Electricity Appropriation; and $9,350.00 from 1% for Art Fund Ending Fund Balance unto 1% for Art Fund - Expenditure Appropriation for 1984 adjustments. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Bid Acceptance Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report for BANS, TANS recommending concurrence in the recommendation of the Finance and Bonds Director to award the Bond Anticipation Notes (BANS) to Peoples National Bank, the Tax Anticipation Notes (TANS) to Erlich Bober, and the General Obligation Equipment Purchase Bonds to Rainier Bank. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, Lincoln Property Company E-1625 August 24, 1981 Page 7 Moderate groundwater seepage was encountered at depth in only two test pits which were excavated during a relatively dry period. Although we encountered only minimal groundwater, groundwater seepage may be expected from cuts during rainy periods. If present, ground- water should be controlled as outlined in the following section. Groundwater Control The subject site contains fine grained soils that will make grad- ing operations difficult during wet weather. For this reason, it is important that groundwater be controlled wherever possible. Seepage should be anticipated from cuts during rainy weather. Surface inter- ceptor ditches may have to be placed along the top of all cuts. Sub- surface drains may have to be placed either along the toe or top of all cuts, whichever location appears to be more feasible. We suggest that appropriate locations of drains be established during grading operations by a representative of Earth Consultants, Inc. , at which time the seepage areas, which if present, will be more clearly defined. The site should be graded to drain at all times and all loose surfaces sealed at night to prevent the infiltration of rain into the soils. After a rainfall, equipment should remain off the soils until they have had a chance to dry sufficiently. Site Preparation All building and pavement areas should be cleared of all struc- tures, utility lines, pavements and debris, large vegetation, brush and other deleterious matter. In all areas that will receive build- ings or pavements, the subgrade should be proofrolled under the obser- vation of a representative of Earth Consultants, Inc. This procedure should indicate the presence of any exceptionally loose or unstable areas which, if present, should be overexcavated and replaced by structural fill or crushed rock. All structural fill should be placed in eight (8) to ten (10 ) inch thick loose lifts and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent rela- tive compaction as determined by ASTM D-1557-70 (Modified Proctor) . The near surface site soils contain an excessive amount of fines which when wet may be difficult to compact. We therefore do not rec- ommend their use during wet weather. If any of the grading is to be conducted during wet weather, we recommend that granular materials with a maximum size of three ( 3) inches, containing less than 5 per- cent fines, be used for structural fill. During dry weather, other granular materials may be used provided they can be properly com- pacted. Imported fill samples should be submitted to Earth Consul- tants, Inc. prior to bringing on the site. The placement of the structural fill should be observed and tested by Earth Consultants, Inc. Earth Consultants, Inc. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JANUARY 14, 1985 ORDINAICES AND RESOLUTIONS The Wats and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: L ncoln Properties Rezone - R-073-84 ( 1 . 8 acres east of Lake Washington Blvd. N at the 2000 block - from R-1 to R-3) S4:ott Annexation ( 11 acres on both sides of Sunset Blvd. NE near Union Ave NE) The Wads and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first readini and further requests suspension of the rules advancing it to second and fir al reading: Atithorizing Issuance of Tax Anticipation Notes The Wa' s and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first read i n< : Confirming LID 328 Assessments Uii1ity Connection Charges The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading and adoption: Tiansfer of Funds for 1984 Year-end Adjustments for Accounting Purposes BIDS F( R TANS, BANS AND BONDS The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the recommendation of the Firance Director to award the BANS to Peoples National Bank, the TANS to Erlich Bober and the Bonds to Rainier Bank. VALLEY COMM CENTER CONSTRUCTION FUND The Ways and Means Committee recommends that the City meets its obligation to provide financing for the Valley Comm Center construction through a loan from its Egiipment Rental Fund for a ten year period as obligated under the inter- local zgreement. APPROVIL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 4225 through No. 25E6 in the amount of $1 , 170, 130. 11 . Earl Clymer, Chairm Tom Tri m Renton City Council 1/7/85 Page four Consent Agenda continued Consent Agenda MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Adopted CONSENT AGENDA AS REVISED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Birthday congratulations were extended to Councilwoman Happy B-Day Mathews byMayor Shinpoch and Council members. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Special Utility recommending concurrence in the following policy for Connection Charge special connection charges for utilities, effective 1/1/85: Policy Continued Once property has been assessed, it may not be charged again even if the use changes to a higher intensity. Properties developed before 1965 (date of first connection charge ordinance) are exempt from the charge. Exempted properties will be assessed only if the property is redeveloped such that a larger water meter, or, in the case of properties using wells, a new water meter, is required. Then a utility connection charge will be imposed. Continued No special utility charge will be collected on City-owned properties. Undevelopable greenbelt and major easements shall not be included in the square footage for connection charge calculations. Continued Latecomer' s agreements may be requested from the City for connection to existing lines. Any party required to oversize utilities may request that that utility participate in the cost of the project. (See Committee report attached.) Continued The Committee further recommended referral of this matter to Ways and Means Committee for proper legislation. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Chairman Mathews extended appreciation to City staff for assistance in development of the policy. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Lincoln Properties An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of Rezone, R-073-84 certain properties within the City of Renton from Public District (P-1) and Residence District (R-1) to Multifamily Residential District (R-3) for Lincoln Properties, File No. R-073-84, east side of Lake Washington Boulevard N. , approximately at the 200 block. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Scott Annexation An ordinance was read annexing 11 acres of property located on the south and north sides of Sunset Boulevard NE and west of Union Avenue NE known as the Scott Annexation. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Resolution Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following resolution for adoption: Resolution #2588 A resolution was read approving final planned unit development, CHG International File No. FPUD-086-84 for CHG International , Inc. , property Final Planned located at 603, 611 and 702 SW 5th Court. MOVED BY CLYMER, Unit Development SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. FPUD-086-84 Upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke regarding effect of bankruptcy proceedings on the applicant' s authority to execute dedications required by the City, City Attorney Warren indicated that all conditions imposed by the City on the project have been met and no further documents are required. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested his "no" vote be recorded, noting concerns that the project may not be completed, thereby creating unsafe conditions in the development. r WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JANUARY 7, 1985 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Lincoln Properties Rezone - R-073-84 (1 .8 acres east of Lake Washington Blvd. N. at the 2000 block - from R-1 to R-3) Scott Annexation (11 acres on both sides of Sunset Blvd. NE near Union Ave NE) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for reading and adoption: Approval of Resolution to Issue Non-Recourse Industrial Development Revenue Bonds for the Hartung Agalite Glass Co. , Inc. Project in Renton CHG International , Inc. FPUD-086-84 (6th Court SW and Stevens Place - Earlington Woods) c rl C ymer, Chairma n(\"\- --- Thomas Trimm , Rober ughes Renton Cily Council December 17, 1984 Page two Maplewood Golf MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, THE MATTER Course Acquisition OF ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF MAPLEWOOD Continued GOLF COURSE BE REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR PROPER LEGISLATION . CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Item 5f removed MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, ITEM 5f BE see below) REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. Scott Annexation City Clerk submitted notice from Boundary Review Board Approval officially approving the Scott Annexation, 11-acre parcel situated on both sides of Sunset Boulevard NE in the vicinity of Union Avenue NE. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Claim for damages Claim for damages in the amount of $259.71 filed by Henry I . Henry Kyle Kyle, 1140 Edmonds Avenue NE #213, for automobile damages sustained when he hit a deep pothole near 1107 SW Grady Way, alleging neglect of roadway by the City (11/20/84) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim for Damages Claim for damages in the amount of $98.31 filed by Tim J. Tim Walker Walker, 1919 Talbot Road South, for expenses from plugged sewer drain allegedly caused by clogged City side sewer 12/09/84) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Lincoln Properties Hearing Examiner recommended approval with restrictive Rezone covenants of Lincoln Properties Rezone, File #R-073-84, 1 .8 File #R-O3-84 acres east of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block, from R-1 to R-3. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Court Case Court case filed by Frank Bean, 777 - 106th Avenue NE, William an: Bellevue, attorney for William A. and Alice M. Clarke, in the Alice Clarke amount of $15,000± for landscape damage allegedly caused by improper dirt removal from adjacent property by the City 11 /14/84) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Railroad Signals , Public Works/Traffic Engineering Department requested Pavement Warning resolution authorizing application for 90% Federal funds for Marking Funding railroad signals and pavement warning markings at Wells see later action) Avenue South/Houser Way South; Bronson Way North/Houser Way North to Sunset Boulevard North; and Burlington Northern Industrial Park. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. LID #330 Public Works Department submitted proposed Local Improvement SW Grady Way District #330, street and utility improvements on SW Grady Way from Lind Avenue SW from Lind Avenue SW to Longacres Drive SW, and requested to Longacres public hearing be set for January 14, 1985. Refer to Ways and Drive SW Means Committee. (see later action) Consent /,genda MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT Approved THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Police/Fire Civil Removed item: Mayor Shinpoch reappointed Donald Holm, 1015 Service Commission Tacoma Avenue NE, and Margaret Proctor, 4124 NE Tenth Place, Reappoinv ments to the Police/Fire Civil Service Commission for six-year terms effective to December 31, 1990. Other members of the Commission include: Louis Barei, Norma Jean Cugini, and Barbara Little. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION TO REAPPOINT MRS. PROCTOR AND MR. HOLM TO THE FIRE/POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION . CARRIED. OLD BUS'NESS Utilities Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Utilities Committee recommending concurrence in the recommendation of the Public Honey Creek Works Department to submit grant application and to authorize Intercepter Project the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the grant application. MOVED Funding BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. 4111 i CITY OF RENION U , 3 ai9 JUL 13 1984 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. LAKESIDE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Prepared for: Lincoln Property Company N. C. , Inc. 11400 S. E. 6th Street, Suite 220 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Prepared by: Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. 2101 112th Avenue N. E. , Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 June, 1984 l TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 -112th AVENUE N.E.,SUITE 110- BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 VICTOR H BISHOP P E TELEPHONE 455-5320-AREA CODE 206 President June 29, 1984 1 Mr. Scott B. Springer, J. D. Lincoln Property Company N. C. , Inc. 11400 S. E. 6th Street, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Lakeside Apartments Traffic Analysis Dear Mr. Springer: Enclosed is our report on the transportation impac of the proposed Lakeside Apartments to be located on Lake WE, iningt n Boulevard in Renton, Washington. This report is partially a revision of our December, 1981 re- port to you entitled "The Lakeside Traffic Analysis" concerning the previously proposed development of the site. However, perti- nent changes since that previous report include the new Lakeside Apartments site plan, the recent rezoning of the Lake Terrace trailer park site to the north, and the completion of the Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park extension. This report a' - - includes more recent traffic volume count data from the City of Renton, and new traffic volume projections and capacity analysis which we have conducted. Please contact us if you have any further questions. Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ENGINEERING, 1)7.t-,L Victor H. Bishop, P. . , President DHE/pic Enclosure TABLE OF CONTENTS Project. Description 4 Existing Conditions 5 Future Conditions Without the Lakeside Apartments Future Conditions With the Lakeside Apartments 10 ConcluE ions and Recommend,'tions 13 Table 1 - Street Intersection Levels of Service FigureE #1 - 14 Transportation Planning & Inginccrinq, Inc. Contributors to this Study Victor H. Bishop, P. E. - President David H. Enger, P. E. - Transportation Engineer 2 LTST Oh FIGURES Figure # 1 EXISTING STREET NETWORK 2 1980 WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 3 1981 AM PEAK HOUR T. FIC VOLUMES ( 6: 45-7: 45 AM) 4 1981 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ( 3: 45-4: 45 PM) 5 1982 WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 6 1984 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (6: 45-7: 45 AM) 7 1984 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (4 : 00-5 : 00 ) 8 PROJECTED 1986 AWDT ' S WITHOUT THE LAKESIDE APARTMENTS 9 PROJECTED 1986 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT THE LAKESIDE APARTMENTS 10 PROJECTED 1986 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT THE LAKESIDE APARTMENTS 11 ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC 12 PROJECTED 1986 AWDT ' S WITH THE LAKESIDE APARTMENTS 13 PROJECTED 1986 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH THE LAKESIDE APARTMENTS 14 PROJECTED 1986 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH THE LAKESIDE APARTMENTS 3 LAKESIDE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Project Description The Lakeside Apartments are a proposed multifamily residen- tial development consisting of approximately 186 rental units. A mix of one and two bedroom units will be constructed in two and three story buildings. Recreational facilities such as a swim- ming pool and a clubhouse will also be provided for residents. Construction is expected to begin in late 1984 and be completed in 1985. The occupancy of residence units is expected to begin in 1985 and the development will be fully occupied by 1986. The Lakeside Apartments site is located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North, approximately 0. 6 miles north of North Park Drive in Renton. Most of the site is presently occu- pied by the Renton Golf Range. The street network shown on Figure 1 is the study area for this traffic analysis, except for Interstate Highway 405 and its interchanges, which are shown for reference only. The proposed vehicular access to the site will be via two driveways onto Lake Washington Boulevard, one near each end of the site. The Lakeside Apartments driveways would be about 380 ' apart, and the south driveway would be about 280 ' north of, and on the other side of the street grom, the north entrance to Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. The driveways will intersect a loop roadway through the site which will also serve as the aisle be- tween rows of perpendicular parking stalls convenient to the buildings.Parking stalls will be provided at a ratio 4 approximately in the range of 12 to 2 stalls per residence unit, with a maximum of about 400 stalls provided. The immediate request is for a rezone of the site from P-1 public use ) to R-3 (multi-family residential ) . Also proposed as part of this project is the vacation of partial. .i two existing unimproved street rights-of-way. These two rights-of-w ,, are identified on the plat map as Lake View Boulevard, gh- ly south from the site, and Third , running rough' -,ast/west through the site. Existing Conditions Figure 1 illustrates the functional roadway classifications, traffic control signal and stop sign locations, and perti- -nt roadway characteristics of the existing street network. The func- tional roadway classifications shown in Figure 1 are those adop- ted by City of Renton Resolution #2345 . Speed limits re posted for 35 MPH on Lake Washington Boulevard, and 30 ...PH on Park Drive, while the remainder of the city streets shown in Figure 1 have 25 MPH speed limits. The traffic signal at the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard North, Garden Avenue North, Park Avenue North, and North Park Drive presently operates in a four-phase fully actuat- ed mode, with one phase for each approach (with green arrows for left turns ) . Lake Washington Boulevard has three approach lanes left only, left or through, right only) , Garden Ave. as two approach lanes (left or through or right, right only) , the east leg has four approach lanes ( left only, left or through, through only, right only ) , and the west leg has three approach lanes left only, through only, through or right ) . 5 Lake Washington Boulevard North has one through lane in each direction, with a northbound left turn lane into each of the two entrances to Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park, and a southbound left turn lane into Houser Way. The Beach Park is a very popular recreation facility on sunny days and also contains a well-used small-boat launching ramp. The Burlington Northern Railroad oper- ates approximately two trains per day on the single-track rail- road line located between Lake Washington Boulevard u.,d the Beach Park. The railroad crossing of Lake Washington Boul rd immedi- ately south of Houser Way, and the railroad crossing of the north- ern Beach Park entrance road are both signalized. Figure 2 shows 1980 daily traffic volumes in the vicinity of the Lakeside apartments site. Figures 3 and 4 show 1981 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes counted at the pertinent street in- tersections in the vicinity of t'-e site and at the driveways to the Lake Terrace Park mobile home court, located immediately north of the Lakeside Apartments site. These older traffic vol- umes are taken from the "Lake Terrace Park Traffic Analysis" re- port (TP&E, September, 1982 ) and are included herein for comparison. Figure 5• shows 1982 weekday traffic volumes, which are the most recent daily traffic volumes available from the City of Renton for this area. At several locations these 1982 volumes are lower the the 1980 weekday traffic volumes shown in Figure 2. One partial explanation for this may be that the N. 30th St. over- pass over I-405 was closed for widening during much of 1982. The Renton Golf Range, which currently occupies much of the Lakeside Apartments site, apparently generates relatively little traffic on weekdays. The Lake Terrace Park mobile home court gen- erates about 400 vehicular trips on an average weekday according 6 to the "Lake Terrace Park Traffic Analysis. " The mobile home park site was recently rezoned to R-3 to allow thL uture construction of a multifamily residential development. Figures 6 and 7 show 1984 AM and PM peak hour fic vol- umes. The volumes shown for the Lake Washington Blvd. N/N. Park Dr:/Garden Ave. N. intersection were counteu on Tuesday June 19, 1984 which was a sunny day with presumably significant ach Park traffic. The other volumes shown in Figures 6 and 7 a - adjusted from the 1981 peak hour counts. Table 1 shows peak hour levels of service calculated for per- tinent existing and proposed intersections along Lake Washington Boulevard North. This street serveE 3 a commuter route for work- ers from Boeing and other nearby industrial plants. Because of the proximity of these industrial plants and the distinct employ- ee shift-change times, Lake Washington Boulevard experienres rel- atively high traffic volume peaking trends. About 20 percent of the daily traffic on Lake Washington Boulevard occurs during the PM peak hour and about 14 percent occurs during the AM peak hour. Because of the relatively high peak hour traffic volumes, and the long distances between gap-creating traffic control devices, vehicles turning onto Lake Washington Boulevard from side streets, such as Burnett Avenue North, experience some delays. However, during the off-peak times, traffic volumes on Lake Washington Boulevard are low and delays are minimal. City of Renton accident records indicate that the traffic accident histo- ry of the streets within the study area has not been unusually serious. Truck traffic volumes within the study area are generally low. Several Metro Transit routes use North Park Drive and pro- vide convenient bus service into the Renton Central Business 7 I . District and beyond. Bicyclists use Lake Washington Boulevard as a commuter and r. ecr. eational. rour.e. There is relatively little pe- destrian traffic, except between the south Beach Park entrance and the Metro bus stops on N. Park Drive during su-^y summer afternoons. Two unimproved street rights-of-way presently r through or adjacent to the Lakeside Apartments site. Third is .a 60 ' right- of-way running easterly from Lake Washington Boulevard to the east Lakeside Apartments site boundary. Third is located between lots 358 and 359 on the sit- , and between site lot 343 and off- site lot 344 . From an elevation of about 49 ' at Lake Washington Boulevard, the Third right-of-way slopes up to an elevation of about 153 ' at •the east site boundary. A constant grade over this approximate 665 ' distance (approximately 104 ' rise ) would be al- most 16%. However, most of this rise occurs in a steep bank lo- cated east of the Lake View Boulevard right-of-way between lots 343 and 344 . Within a 150 ' horizontal ..istance, the Third right- of-way rises about 74 ' , which would be an average grade of almost 50%. The undeveloped 60 ' Lake View Boulevard right-of-way zigzags south from Third Approximately 2000 ' to the undeveloped Morgan Avenue right-of-way. Off-site lots 344, 345, and 346 lie on the east side of this right-of-way, across from the Lakeside Apartments site. The former Lake View Boulevard right-of-way which extended north from Third through the Lakeside Apartments site was vacated years aao. The Lake View Boulevard right-of-way south of Third has several sharp corners connected by short straight sections, and apparently was laid out with little regard for the topography of the land or the practicalities of road construction. Future Conditions Without the Lakeside Apartments The City of Renton Six Year Transportation Improvement Program ( 1984 to 1989 ) lists several proposed street improvement prl jests in the vicinity of the Lakeside Apartments site. One proposed project would improve Lake Washington Boulevard from North Park Drive to the north city limits, with drain-.ae, paving, curbs, sidewalks, illumination, and channelization. Other pro- posed projects would improve Burnett Avenue North, ' . _ `n Street, and Park Avenue North with similar types of road-im- provements. All of these projects have been assignees. .ow prior- ities by the City of Renton and none of the projects are funded. A multifamily residential development has been p'--nosed for the site occupied by the Lake Terrace Park mobile r court, just north of the Lakeside Apartments site. As disc. cd in the Lake Terrace Park Traffic Analysis", the development could have as many as 230 residential units with 460 parking spaces. This could generate up to 1400 vehicular trips on an average weekday. Although the construction schedule is not yet known, in the inter- est of being conservative in this Lakeside Apartments Traffic Analysis, it is assumed that the proposed Lake Terrace Park multifamily development would be occupied by 1986 . Figure 8 shows projected 1986 average weekday traffic vol- umes (AWDT ' s ) for the study area without the Lakeside Apartments. Figures 9 and 10 show projected 1986 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes without the Lakeside Apartments. These volume projections are based on projections for 1985 in the "Lake Terrace Park Traffic Analysis" , which included increased Beach Park traffic, and traffic volumes due to the proposed Lake Terrace Park multifamily development. Background traffic volume growth was assumed to be approximately 3% per year, as 9 recommended by the City of Renton. The projections shown in Figures 8, 9 and 10 also were adjusted to reflect the recent traffic volume counts made by the City of Renton. Table 1 shows 1984 peak hour levels of service calculated fo`r the street intersections in the study area, wi `hout the Lakeside Apartments. Somewhat higher traffic volume:. n Lake Washington Boulevard due to the proposed Lake m rrace Park multifamily residential development and normal traffic growth will cause somewhat longer delays to side street traffic during the peak periods, such as at Burnett Avenue. The calculated PM peak hour level of service for the Lake Washington Boulevard/N. Park Drive/Garden Ave. N. intersection would deterior to level of service E. However, traffic conditions will still be toler- able and probably will not be noticeably worse than the present conditions. Future Conditions With the Lakeside Apartments It is estimated that approximately 1135 veh. trips would be generated by the Lakeside Apartments on an a je week- day at full occupancy, . A vehicular trip is defined a "A single or one-direction vehicle movement with either the origin desti- nation (exiting or entering ) inside the study site" (Trip Generation An Informational Report,Institute of Transportation Engineers, Thir3 Edition - 1982 ) . As shown in Figure 11 , this estimate is based on 186 multifamily units and a rate of 6. 1 vehicular trips per unit per average weekday. Approximately 113 trips ( 10% of the total ) would occur during the AM peak hour, with about 80% of them enteri;: _ site. Approximately 130 trips ( 11. 5% of the total ) would occur during the PM peak hour , with about 67% of them entering the site. 10 Figure 11 shows the estimated distribution of the site- generated traffic onto the street network. Most of the site gen- erated traffic will be oriented south toward the industrial area and the Renton Central Business District. The most-used route will probably be I-405 via the interchange at N. E. Park Drive, while some site-generated traffic will also use the I-405 inter- changes at North 30th Street and at North 44th Street. Due to the internal layout shown on the preliminary site plan approx- imately 70% of the site-generated traffic is expecte ' to use the north driveway, and 30% the south driveway. Figure 12 shows projected 1986 average daily traffic volumes with the Lakeside Apartments fully occupied. Figures 13 and 14 show projected 1986 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes with the Lakeside Apartments for the pertinent street intersections within the study area. These peak hour traffic volume projections may be somewhat high, because they assume that the peak generation hours for the site coincide with the on-street traffic peak hours. Because of the many industrial plant commuters, the on- street peak hours occur earlier than normal, perhaps actually be- fore the Lakeside Apartments traffic generation peak hours. Computed levels of service for these intersections, assuming the projected traffic volumes, are shown in Table 1. The traffic generated by the Lakeside apartments is not expected to cause any major traffic capacity problems. Though traffic volumes will increase somewhat, the signalized intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard, Garden Avenue, and Park Drive will continue to operate at levels of service D and E, with little change in traffic conditions noticeable to motorists. Vehicles turning onto Lake Washington Boulevard during the peak hours will continue to experience delays, including those vehicles at Burnett Avenue and at the proposed site driveways. 11 y Because of the relatively low volumes which will turn left from Lake Washington Boulevard into the site driveways, left turn lanes will not be necessary on the arterial at these locations. Exyemely few left turns into the site will occur during the morning peak. Slightly more left turns will occur during the evening peak, but the PM southbound through traffic volumes delayed by left turning vc....les will be relatively low. The City of Renton Parking Ordinance requires 1 1/ 4 stalls per unit for multifamily residentia' developmer,Ls. The 279 stalls required for 186 apartment units is well below the total of up to 400 stalls which will be provided. The parking supply will be ample, and well distributed in relation to the proposed buildings. Pedestrian traffic between the Lakeside Apartments and ...he Beach Park is expected to be significant on sunny days, especial- ly during the summer. Pedestrian volumes between the ?'-, rtments and other locations will be minimal . Because of the distances to the nearest Metro transit stops (about 3/4 mile ) , very few res- idents will use the bus. The Apartments may generate some bicy- cle traffic along the relatively flat routes to the Renton industrial area and central business district. The proposed vacation of portions of the two undeveloped rights-of-way identified on the plat map as Third and .ke View Boulevard will restrict access to some undeveloped lots :..rtmediate- ly south and east of the Lakeside Apartments site. After the pro- posed vacation, lots 344, 345 and 346 apparently would still have access via the undeveloped Lake View Boulevard and Morgan Avenue rights-of-way. However, this would be a circuitous route to Lake Wash gton Boulevard and the construction of a roadway may not be practical because of the terrain. Conclusions and Recommendations The traffic generated by the Lakeside is not expected to cause any major traffic problems. The slightly increased traffic volumes in the area probably will not be noticeable to motorists or residents. Increased volumes on Lake Washington Boulevard will somewhat increase the difficulty of turning onto this arteri- al during the peak hours, but conditions will still be tolerable. The delays expected for motorists waiting to turn from the site driveways onto Lake Washington Boulevard during the peak hours could be minimized by providing enough driveway width so that right and left turning vehicles would not impede each other. Driveway widths of about 35 feet (approximately 32 feet minimum) would allow a right turning vehicle and a left turning vehicle to wait side by side, with another lane for traffic entering the site. The driveways and adjacent landscaping should be designed to provide good motorist sight distances. Also, to improve safety and traffic flow on the two site driveways, several parking stalls which are shown on the prelim- inary site plan should be eliminated. The first 3 stalls on the north side of the south driveway should be eliminated so that the parking stall striping begins about 65 ' east of Lake Washington Boulevard. Just northeast of the recreation building four stalls should be eliminated and three reoriented so that there would be no parking stalls on the north entrance roadway within about 200 ' east of Lake Washington Boulevard. I i3 It is recommended that a pedestrian walkway be provided along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard to the north Beach Park entrance. The intersection with the Beach Park en- trance road would be the best location for pedestrians to cross Lake Washington Boulevard North. A good pedestrian connection to the Beach Park would be an attractive and functional amenity for the Apartments. The construction of a road within the Third right-of-way up the hill to the property east of the Lakeside Apartments site would not be feasible, due to the prohibitive grades. This prop- erty east of the Lakeside Apartments site slopes up steeply to the I--405 right-of-way, and may not be developable. However, it appears that t most feasible route for constructing an access road to is property may be to contour south from Meadow Avenue N. , along the west side of the I-405 right-of-way. Another route may be to contour north from the undeveloped Morgan Ave. right-of- way. Both of these routes would be on private property, general- ly along the former Pacific Coast Railroad right-of-way. Construction of a road within the existing Lake View Boulevard right-of-way would be difficult due to the awkward geometrics and topography. The restriction of access to adjacent lots ( #344 , 345 and 346 ) due to street vacations could possibly be mitigated with ac- cess agrc'2ments. These lots could be granted access to Lake Washingt ioulevard via the Lakeside Apartments site circulation roadways. It is conceivable that lots 344 and 345 could gain ac- cess from near the southeast corner of the Lakeside Apartments loop roa.. .y, via the north driveway from Lake Washington Boulevard. Lots 345 and 346 could also gain access via tihe Lakeside Apartments south driveway. A more detailed civil engi- neeri investigation of soil conditions, topography, and grades 14 would be needed to determine whether these connections would be feasible. Also, the potential land use and resulting traffic gener- ation of these adjacent lots should be considered. A relatively high trip generation land use such as a multifamily development could impact the Lakeside Apartments driveways and circulation roads. If much through traffic due to adjacent land uses were ex- pected, it would be desirable for the Lakeside north driveway and its circulation road to the east to be free of parking stalls. This would involve the removal of up to 55 parking stalls shown on the current site plan. Some of these stalls could possibly be regained by redesign of portions of the site plan. 15 TABLE 1 Street Tntersection Levels of Service During Street Traffic Peak Hours 1984 1986 1986 Intersection Without With All on Lake Existing Lakeside Apartments Lakeside Apartments Washington Blvd. N. ) AM PM AM PM AM PM Burnett Ave. N. * D E D E D E south intersection) north site driveway** A/A/E D/C/E south site driveway** A/A/D D/C/E N.E. Park Drive and Garden Avenue i, D D E D E Signalized ) Level of service for left turn from Burnett only. Individual levels of service shown for right turns from driveway (assumed STOP sign)/ left turns from Lake Washington Boulevard/ r left turns from driveway (assumed STOP sign) . Description of Levels of Service: Primary Reference: A Little or no delay Interim Materials "on Highway Capacity B Short traffic delays Transportation Research Circular No. 212, ' C Average traffic delays Transportation Research Board, D Long traffic delays January 1980, p. 37. E Very-long traffic delays ; congestion I FUNCTIONAL ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION, FREEWAY MAJOR ARTERIAL SECONDARY ARTERIAL COLLECTOR ARTERIAL e I N LOCAL ACCESS APPROX. r S E 80TH ST.SCALE TRAF =IC CONTROL DEVICES S) TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL I.. = 1600 y STOP SIGNS AT MAJOR INTERSECTIONS aV Q N 4 TTH ST. NOTE: ALL LOCAL ACCESS 18(21 . STREETS STOP AT 2 N ARTERIALS ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS 4 H seTH Sr IN 20 APPROX. PAVEMENT WIDTH 2 2) NO. OF LANES cl I P PAVED SHOULDERS z G GRAVEL SHOULDERS IN j J 1-o xl N NO. SHOULDERS 1" ICCURBS MN 30TH ST.2L / % 24(2)2P = N-E 27T ST O, k VZ LAKESIDE APARTMENTS SITE Y GENE COULON 1; MEMORIAL 3 AH 08/"'•• BEACH PARK k y f C56,40(2)C i:/:Ii 36.:-\'''‘ BOEING 82'(7)6'p i EXISTING STREET NETWORK FIGURE if i 1 l LAKESIDE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 1 SOURCE : CITY OF RENTON 1980 ATRAFFICFLOWMAP N APPROX. r S E 80TH ST. SCALE k r I"= I600' moo. q3- Q N 40TH ST. K N JCTH D_ 0 dN.3THST g/ IA" Li lk 61780 5310 1 N.E. 27TH ST X- c\- O an i d v 2 s' 20,930 3 cc o p GENE COULON itMEMORIAL tiF PO. ••:BEACH PARK 4., V 0 00, ] N BOEING v1I8% o o 1980 WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ifIGUR1 IRLA..._SIDE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC A..ALYSIS 2 o 1,(71 N. 36TH ST. x- A 1zir roll-) N o A.NOT TO 16i O SCALE N (D — 1 5 I -- E. - 23 STN30TH w 3 —if I r r'4, O ( = M O COr HwI Z gt V. LAKE Q_ TERRACE PARK r- 18 V 23ps DR S< iP 69 6 q y 0 _ roA c9PO J IGURE 198:. AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (6 : 45-7: 45 AM) A' ' 3 LAKESIDE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS gam^ a 4 N. 36TH ST111 vN N a h . NOT TO Lu SCALE a o v 1 1 N R 7 Pr—35 N.30TH L--i ST 31 w, 4 —ID- I T cooN aD O SOURCES : mW mk MANUAL COUNTS BY THE CITY OF RENTON LAKET.P. F E. h TERRACE PARK Flo DR. 43/ `!• c<P ? 1-1 h 1 6 O c` 2 QP 198 . PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ( 3 : 45-4 : 45 PM} 6IGURE 4LAKESIDEAPARTMENTSTRAFFICANALYSIS v SOURCE : CITY OF RENTON 1982 TRAFFIC FLOW MAP Q- N APPROX.11,S.E 80TH ST. SCALE kV 1":: 1600' 0V t:0°' o Q N 40T H ST. N METH ST Z A: r? I an a N.30TH ST I tBo T„' N•E 27T H ST s..., LAKESIDE APARTMENTS J yr o SITE I. vx 19,I`i S ti ^ o 0 JCS z GENE COULON MEMORIAL V BEECH PART( y F P R D. o BOEING IA i FIGURE `1982 WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES li 5 LAKESIDE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 4 1 r -N. 36TH ST. J+ tl :!;11 '', N p o NOT TO x \SCALE a I f - 25 N t 30TH ST w 3 — 1 I ---A o ' ten , J w k 101 CO 21 O d3 GENE COULON MEMORIAL BEACH PARK DR c",p N' 2re y0L, Sba t i r J.,› p , ii BOEING o(, iI 2 FIGURE 1984 P PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ( 6 : 45-7: 45 AM) A' 6 LAKESIDE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS J oyN, 36TH ST. 1 f 1P A N o o ". NOT TO m" A ` \ 1 SCALE a z a nn ,___ 7 2 N 30TH __1_ sT 1 r.) t if 1 Iw s 2 O o cn 3 a w Y GENE COULON Cr MEMORIAL 3 I DRJBEACHPARK i t BOEING e Z c yP, I 2 4A 1984 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ( 4 : 00-5 : 00 PM)IGUR SIDE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS fi ck- /// A f/_________ APPROX. i:.I S E 80TH ST. SCALE In= 1600' r_ s t\ o 0v N 40TH ST. 111 N.36TH $T. z if a n a N.30T H ST 0, od Z N.E 27TH ST k W LAKESIDE APARTMENTS i SITE le 22,00o F o . p0 n* riMGENEEMORIALCOULON N BEACH PARK A ' F, P ROpllri- ---"\ ' c9 A\BOEING v, o Tx PROJEC7EU 1986 AWDT' S WITHOUT THE LAKESIDE APARTMENTS FIGURE 8 I. DE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS p 00 I(,,( ,*____ , N. 36TH ST t (.... L), N CD\ NOT TO SCALE a 5 , l n 2 L S ti / Lip,— ,(1 N.3OT H SL w I t r a 3 I —* -- nn n to J1 . ~ 2 v ‘ \k Ji Y GENE COULON A. 1( 3.' a MEMORIAL J BEACH PARK C, DR. P SF9 P 1P- 1. 'q, if- lir z6- \\*._,.. _,* \ BOEING C9 0 PRJJEC. ,D 1986 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FlGIl EWITHOUTTHELAKESIDEAPARTMENTS 9LT 'SIDE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 1 Jc I 3 r— `'`N. 36TH ST. Ak1 11 A D% A , , N I' NOT TO c?' ':). \ ` >SCALE a 2 o - n 7 II l 8 I/ Y ..,p, S6 N 30TH A r I1 —/ r w' - 14 L H F-W Z o 3 c. R 0 I- 9{- o t i Lo GENE COULON MEMORIAL DR.J BEACH PARK S G ,4 P 0 it _____, 00 ` 14 0_, BOEING 1q,,,... 0.113 2 IROJECTED 1986 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES IFIG R\ WITHOUT THE LAKESIDE APARTMENTS 11 1 0 LAKESIDE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ESTIMATED LAKESIDE APARTMENTS TRIP GENERATION APPROX. 186 UNITS X of 6 . 1 VEHICLE TRIPS/UNIT*L N APPROX. 1135 TRIPS/AVERAGE APPROX. WEEKDAY 1111 S E 80TH ST. E I"= 1600' SOURCE : 0 TRIP GENERATION-AN v N 40TH ST INFORMATIONAL REPORT I r , _I .T. E. , 3RD EDITION, 1982 . r' N 36TH ST _ vJ H it t O_ a J N.30TH ST 1,00 115 ( 10%) q NE. 27 TH S7 A,--,( 2 I 01 VO LAKESIDE APARTMENTSjpSITE T •F CO ?m 510 (45%) 0 Ntot)0°° z GENE COULON 4011MEMORIAL 11!F PA,RBEACHPARKfo,. 0 BOEING ro0y °\ty ti N N o C r.___.MM ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF SITE—GENERATED TRAFFIC F G li 11LAKESIDEAPARTMENTSTRAFFICANALYSIS l o. Q N APPROX. S.E BOTH ST. SCALE kv 111 1600' 0 Q N. 4OTH ST. ill:: N 36TH ST. 2 I a S a N.JOT H ST. H 6° 19#:lA. S2S 6E3 1 4. N: i N•E. 2)TH. ST 8 o W LAKESIDE Q APARTMENTS SITE t\ iici) 4 2 ,S/o ii: ikGENECOULONitM ^.1ORIAL 4!F DR BEACH PARK •, y• PAR j. II CI 6, 9 4.BOEING V l PROJECTED' _ . .6 AWDT'S WITH THE LAKESIDE APARTMENTS FIGURE IR—AKESIDE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 1 2 0 AI) I N. 36TH ST. f (-- a 1,,4, N wo ,\0/\, NOT TO ui SCALE a 9 z R n h oo S 3 I N 307 H srN tw3 — r D J '_- Pj9 2 I- 0 may 1* Cz LAKESIDE 1 =APARTMENTS W v Y GENE COULON v Q MEMORIAL DRJBEACHPARKIo G 2:0- F2se 0 1.614 qY ram s BOEING 5 P0 2 PROJECTED 1986 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGUR! WITH THE LAKESIDE APARTMENTS 14 13 LAKESIDE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS I A I f N. 36TH ST. ix, N o A^, A N NOT TO ct, L.„,SCALE a 0 c9 N p--- 65 N.30TH si- I I --if N) t rw ,7,_ __ea.. n J 0 o' sx 2/ z I LAKESIDE co wAPARTMENTS 9 lbl itYGENECOULON Q MEMORIAL a2. BEACH PARK o DR. 1 GS ..QF 2 \'• ,Af Iib02 q BOEING 1q\oi" ip vo<, 1 PROJECTED 1986 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES IJGUR WITH THE LAKESIDE APARTMENTS li 1 4 LAKESIDE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. Cindy Strupp being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and saysthatshe is the chief clerk of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been Ins called bac for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, Public Nryof/ inside th printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper r0publishedfourt4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is NOTICE OF PUB / Ce now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the RENTON L90 NS aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record HEARING Dr, a/a Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior RENTON, W9ec9 o N it Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, A PUBLIC HEARI90 ora Aa ejSo thi THE RENTON L . Chro e r EXAMINER AT HIS R . i% .NG Washington.That the annexed is a Land....Us.e...Heari.ng IN THE COUNCIL CHAMbv.THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY .,_L, RE- NTON,WASHINGTON ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. as it was published in regular issues(and INC. not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period Application to rezone 9.7 acres of property from P-1 to R-3 for a future multi- family development having approximately of one consecutive issues,commencing on the 186 housing units, file R-073-84; located along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block(current- 7 th day of September 19 84 ,and ending the ly the site of Renton Golf Range). CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNER- SHIP Application to rezone approximately 8.0 day of 19 ,both dates acres of property from B-1 to R-3 to allow inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- construction of approximately 200 multi- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee family dwelling units,file R-067-84;located approximately 150 feet north of N.E. 4th 2 00,l) Street,between Monroe Avenue N.E.and charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 7 • , which Union Avenue N.E.,between the 3700 and has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the 3800 block of N.E. 4th Street first insertion and per folio of o undred words for each subsequent Legal descriptions of the files noted insertion. above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PNE- SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON Chief C.ler SEPTEMBER 18, 1984,AT9:00A.M.TO Subscribed and sworn to before me this....7th day of S.eptembe.x 19..84.azr CITY, e OF RENTON Notary Public i d for the State of Washington, D residing at Ilk King County. INNFEEDrr_`_ .... Federal Way OCT 15 1984 Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. F3UILtNNG/ZONti'G DEPT. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. VN#87 Revised 5/82 For Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm.Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of December 17, 1984 Meeting Date) Staff Contact FRED J . KAUFMAN Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Rezone Consent Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legs ] Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business A. see yellow file Study Session Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval with Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A conditions and filing of Restrictive Covenants Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Recuired $ Amount $ Appropriation-Expenditure Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) Hearing held on September 28, 1984, continued to October 12, 1984. Appeal pericd past. Recommend approval with filing of Restrictive Covenants requiring Site Plan Review. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: see tile. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT WHEREAS, MARJORIE LOTTO, individually and as personal representative of the estate of M. W. Lotto, deceased, and Thpmas H. Phinney as personal representative of the estate of Anna Phinney, deceased (collectively "Owners") are ownrs of the real property located in the City of Renton, Kin) County, Washington, described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; WHEREAS, the Owners desire to impose the following Restrictive Covenant running with the land as to use, present and future, of the described real property; NOW, THEREFORE, the Owners hereby establish, grant and impose a Covenant running with the described real property with respect to the use by the undersigned, their grantees, successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: 1 . Site Plan Review. Improvement of the real pro- perty described herein shall be subject to Site Approval as set forth in City of Renton Ordinance No. 3454 and the application procedures attached as Exhibit B and incorpo- rated herein by this reference as the same exist on the date of this Covenant. If during the Duration of this Covenant, the City of Renton amends, modifies the ordinance or appli- cation procedures in any matter to impose less restrictive requirements on the development of or constructions upon the described property then the benefit of such less restrictive requirements shall inure to the benefit of the Owners, their grantees, successors, heirs and assigns. 2. puration. This Covenant shall remain in full force and effect for at least a ten-year period and shall automatically expire on December 31 , 1994 . If prior to expiration of this Covenant, improvements which have re- ceived Site Approval are completed, this Declaration of Restrictive Covenant shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect without the necessity of any further documentation. The Owners may request the City of Renton execute the following release for purposes of clear- ing title to the described property; and if so requested, this City of Renton shall execute the same: THE CITY OF RENTON does hereby release and forever terminate that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenant dated this day of 1984 , King County Recording No.in connection with the use and development of the property described on Exhibit, attached hereto and incorpo- rated herein by this reference. CITY OF RENTON Attest:y . By City Clerk Its NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT] 3 . Enforcement. This Declaration of Restrictive Covenant is specifically enforceable by proper legal proce- dures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton and Owners, their grantees, successors, heirs and assigns. 14A,FiA-1 MARJOIE LOT O, Individually MARJORIE LOTTO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of M. W. Lotto, deceased C/40;;;((a/}//./P' It-L-1--4--(---(- edThomasH. Phinney as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anna Phinney, deceased STAVE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COU CITY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me MARJORIE LOTTO, known to me to be the individual that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS cmy hand nd official seal hereto affixed this day of Y`- ,20P4 A-- 1984. rf, ram p NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State .j Was ington, residing at d -,7Tt, b STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COJNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me MARJORIE LOTTO, Personal Representative of the Estate of M. W. Lotto, known to me to be the individual that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed on behalf of the Estate of M. W. Lotto, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed this day of 1984. A af-t NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State Of Washington, residing at ice. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me Thomas H. Phnney Personal Representative of the Estate of Anna Phinney, known to me to be the individual that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed on behalf of the Estate of Anna Phinney, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed this 3( th day of November 1984 . 7'7v2 N TARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Kent EXHtBIT "A" Lincoln Properties R-073-84 Legal description of property (If more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). nrs 157 and 35R _ C fl Hillman ' s lake 1.Jashingtnn Camden i)f Frlan fivicinn t?n 5 , ciri,arp in King rnninty , Wachintrn Tracts 340 , 341 and 343 , and Vacated Tracts 342 and 359 , ALL it C. D. Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden No . 5 , as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats , on page 83 , records of King County ; TOGETI- ER WITH that portion of Lake View Blvd. (104th Ave . S .E. ) vacated by Order of the County Commissioners , which attached thereto by opEration of law; EXCEPT that portion of vacated Tract 359 conveyed to King County for road ty deed recorded under Recording No . 1029408 ; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. Exhibit B C ,Y OF RENTO " BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION PROCEDURE Conditional Use Permit, Site Approval, Special Permit, and Temporary Permit The Land Use Hearing Examiner holds one regular public hearing each Tuesday at 9:00 a.m., in the Munic pal Bullding, Council Chambers. Applications to be considered at the public hearing must be Hied with and must be found complete n to the heaacceptedns by the The applicant8ii is Building requestedand lng to Department at (east twenty-one (21) day be present at the public hearing meeting. REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING APPLICATION The appr)priate filing fee is to be paid to the City Finance Department after the application is checked and accepted by the Building and Zoning Department. The fee is not refundable. 1.Special Permit, Conditional Use Permit 300 plus $10 per acre.or Temporary Permit Site Approval 300 plus $ 5 per acre. E wironmental Checklist Review Fee 605 for value plus $1 per $10,000 forOvallue greater than $10,000. 2.Six (6) copies of a completed application form, complete with signature, six (6) copies cf the Affidavit of Ownership. 3.ix (6) completed copies of an Environmental Checklist Form. 4.Ix (6) copies of a fully dimensioned site plan, to scale, showing: it.Subject property (all property lines dimensioned) and abutting streets (including widening). Location of the subject site with regards to the nearest street intersections, Including intersections opposite the subject property. Location of existing driveways adjacent to the subject property or on the opposite side of the street facing the subject property. d.All existing public Improvements including, but not necessarily limited to: curb, gutter, and sidewalk; median islands; street trees; electroliers; fire hydrants; utility poles, etc., including those adjacent to the subject site. e.Location of existing and proposed structures, parking, loading areas, driveways, existing on-site trees, existing or proposed fencing or retaining walls, free-standing signs, easements, refuse areas, and on-site lighting fixtures, utility junction boxes, or public utility transformers. f. Grading plan, if the proposed grade differential on-site will exceed twenty-four inches (24") from top of curb or adjacent properties. g.Site development plans/landscaping plans should include: location and size of planting areas location, size and spacing and names of proposed and existing shrubs, trees and groundcovers; decorative rockery or like landscape improvements north arrow and scale names and location of abutting streets and public improvements planting details (soil mix, planting depth and width, and bark mulch depth) location of buildings, parking areas, and access existing and proposed contours 5. Six ;6) copies of fully dimensioned architectural elevations of all buildings and structures Including: a. Building materials and colors; including roof, walls, or other enclosures. b. Fence or retaining wall materials, colors, and architectural design. c. Existing and proposed building signs, including but not necessarily limited to: size, location, materials and colors. d.Architectural design of on-site lighting fixtures. e. Cross-section of roof showing location and height of roof top equipment such as, but not limited to, air conditioners, compressors, etc. 6. Super-K reduclioiia of all cr either x 11" or 81/2" x 14". Xerox reductions are not generally acceptable unless absolutely clear. 7. For Special Permits, Conditional Use Permits and Temporary Permits the burden of proof as to the appropriateness of the application lies with the applicant. Any such application shill be accompanied by a written description/ justification setting forth the reasons in favor of the applications. 8. SI; (6) copies of vicinity map (1':200'). NOTE: Photographs or manufacturers' brochures may be submitted to clarify the specifics of building materials, colors or any specific architectural detail proposed. Revised 12/1982 Fnrm 181 OF R4,' L THE CITY OF RENTONr-)MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9 FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235 - 2593OP q1-F,D scp1S- 0 October 29, 1984 Mr. John P fillips 2201 Weste•n Avenue, Suite #1555 Seattle, Wi shington, 98121 Re: Lincoln Properties Rezo ie R-073-84 Dear Mr. Philips: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the above matter has not been appealed v ithin the time period established by ordinance. We have this date received and reviewed a copy of the proposed restrictive covenants, and wish to advise that you may proceed with the signing and notarizing of same. When this has been accomplished, please forward to this office so that we may submit this matter to the City Clerk, for transmitta to the City Council for their review. You will r€ceive notification of final approval, as well as a copy of the enacting ordinance from the City Clerk, upon adoption by the City Council. If further assistance or information is desired, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk/0722 cc: City Clerk Builcing and Zoning Department Scott Springer AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 12th day of October 1984, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. 1211 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /c ± day of Vi 1984. Notary Public in an for the State of Washington, residing at therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: LINCOLN PROPERTIES R-073-84 The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARINGEXAMINERATHISREGULARMEETINGINTHECOUNCILCHAMBERSONTHESECONDFLOOROFCITYHALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON OCTOBER 9, 1984, AT9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC. Applicati )n to rezone approximately 1.8 acres of property from R-1 to R-3 for future multi-family development as part of an application to rezone 7.9 acres of property to accommodate approximately 186 dwelling units, file R-073-84; located a.ong the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard north at the 2000 block currently the site of the Renton Golf Range). A legal description of the file noted above is on file in the Renton Building and ZoningDepartment. ALL INTE RESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON OCTOBER 9, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHE:D: September 28, 1984 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANE TTE SAMEK-McKAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE COCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ONTHEPROPERTYDESCRIBEDABOVEASPRESCRIBEDBYLAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary PL bli in and for the State of Washington residing i l 04A on the 28th day of Sep tember. 4 'l4.e Q l2,J. 1 SIGNED: 0518N MEMORANDUM OF CONCURRENCE APPLICAT[ON NO(s): R-073-84 DESCRIPT ON OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone approximately 7.9 acres of property zoned P-1 (Public Use) and 1.8 acres of property zoned R-1 Residential Single Family) to R-3 Residential Multiple Family) for a future multi-family development having approximately 186 housing units. PROPONE VT: Lincoln Property Company N.C., Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block (currently the site of the Renton Golf Range). LEAD AGENCY: Building and Zoning Department DATE OF ERC REVIEW: September 19, 1984 Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined that the requested modifications to the initial proposal reviewed under ECF-070-84 on August 15, 1984 are within tho scope of that original proposal and the environmental determination of non-signif:cance is still valid. This decision was reached following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning D apartment. Oral comments were accepted from: Ronald Nelson, Richard Houghton, Michael Parness, James Bourasa, James Matthew, Jerry Lind, Gary Norris, and Gene Williams. Incorporated by reference in the record of proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-070-84 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Scott B. Springer, dated June 18, 19E4. 2. Ap)lication(s): Rezone (R-073-84). SIGNATURES: Ronald G Nelson Michael Par sr Building E nd Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor 1.zt_-( 1 . Ri hard C. Houghton Public Works Director INFORMATION: This Memorandum of concurrence corrects an error on the application form in which the total 9.7 acres was designated as being currently zoned P-1. 0706E October 12, 1984 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: LINCOLN PROPERTIES FILE NO. R-073-84 LOCATION: East of Lake Washington Blvd. North, approximately at the 2000 block. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Rezone approximately 1.8 acres from R-1 to R-3 for future multi-family deavelopment as part of an application to rezone 7.9 acres of property to accommodate approximately 186 dwelling units. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with signing of Restrictive Covenants. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on September 18, 1984. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on October 9, 1984, at 9:05 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Minicipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, original staff report on entire subject site, recommendation of Hearing Examiner to the City Council, and taped transcript of initial Public Hearing. Exhibit #2 - Legal posting notice which includes the omitted property. Exhibit #3 - Memorandum of concurrence from the ERC supplementing their original recommendation. Exhibit #4 - Publication for 1.8 acres previously omitted. Exhibit #5 - Assessors Map delineating the 1.8 acres, as outlined in black. The hearing was opened and the Hearing Examiner called on Roger Blaylock to briefly review the proposal, stating this is the portion of the proposal heard on September 18, 1984. At that time the R-1 portion of the property had not been properly published and the hearing on that portion of the site had to be set for another date. Mr. Blay ock reviewed the previously submitted staff report, referencing the comments from various city departments. He advised the total property involved is a total of 9.7 acres, and the R-1 portion is 1.8 acres of the total property. There will be approximately 19.2 units per acre for the total development. He stated the ERC's greatest concern with this proposal was the preservation of the eastern one-third of the site which had extreme slopes and extreme environmental sensitivities due to possible landslides. The applicant LINCOLN PROPERTIES R-073-84 October 12, 1984 Page 3 6.The majority of the subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1791 in September of 1959, as amended by Ordinances 1800 and 1804, adopted in October and December of 1959 respectively. The property was automatically zoned G-6000 Single Family Residential) upon annexation. In 1982, after residential districts were consolidated, the zoning became a R-1 designation. 7. A previous application for a similar request by the applicant was not completed. 8. The subject site was quarried earlier in its history resulting in a level area adjacent to Lake Washington Blvd., and very steep slopes along the eastern third of the site just below I-405. The elevation differences approach, and in some cases exceed, 100 feet yielding slopes of approximately 50% in places. 9. A reclassification of the subject site would allow development of a multifamily complex. Such a complex could accommodate approximately 186 dwelling units per conceptual plans submitted to the ERC (which only place an upper limit but not necessarily lower limit upon development density). Population predicated upon such a scheme would approach approximately 465 persons (2.5 per unit). An increase of approximately 47 school age children would be estimated to result (.25 per unit). The complex is estimated to generate approximately 1,042 trips per day 5.6 trips per unit) with trips spread out over the day but concentrated usage in the AM and PM peak hours. 10. The ultimate housing density of the proposal, both of the subject site and the first tract, would be approximately 19.2 units per acre. Similarly, the figures in finding 9 above represent both sites. 11. The existing traffic conditions will deteriorate along Lake Washington Blvd as a result of the proposed Lake Terrace Apartments proposed for the site immediately north of the subject site on the site of the Mobile Home/Trailer Court. The Level of Service (LOS) will drop to E, the build-out of the subject site would be expected to add to this diminished level of service. Turning movements will become more difficult both at intersections with public streets and driveway intersections of private property entering onto Lake Washington Blvd. 12. Public Works indicated a street connection to Meadow Avenue North should be accommodated by the subject site. The slopes in excess of 50% appear to preclude such access through the subject site. 13. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of high and medium density multifamily development and greenbelt, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 14. The ERC review resulted in the protection of the steep easterly slopes as well as requiring the applicant to participate in a series of traffic improvements not only for Lake Washington Blvd but also surrounding streets. Included were left turn lanes, widening projects and merge lanes. 15. There have been a number of new short plats in the areas north of the site. The Lake Terrace rezone was approved for the property immediately north of the site, and the Quendall PUD approach was approved for property further north. Coulon Park was recently expanded across the street from the subject site. 16. Utilities are generally available within the immediate vicinity of the subject site. While extensions will be necessary, the systems have the capacity to service the eventual development of the site which the R-3 zoning requested would permit. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, will not impair the public health, safety and welfare, and in addition, is in compliance with at least one of the three criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis: or LINCOLN PROPERTIES R-073-84 October 1 1984 Page 5 Pursuant t o Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before October 26, 1984. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors rel ed upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members )f the City Council. All communications concerning the the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsidc ration as well as Appeals to the City Council. I;iy- I i I I 1 1 . I • r l V'..r• t<7Z1._ . 1,1-el '11111111 ..1 KINNYO IE I_C C045T 4 4 s \ ' • - 7/;411-Ei iiinuqm . .. .4 I1 1Y la A 1 I• I= I' 1 I z of t+ t» zse zt, zzo N :::1 1.-11111:: I ` t O J , 11:• I _ I 2 a i l V. i - I I DAss cn J.. !,7 1 7-.....:<.... ::;:c...7‘;-.:it;"1: tif ;;' i i' I 1 , . 1 1 i A 9 Komy . - --. Iw. /Ar /.4. LI zSe DALE zl. L L1 e IONS r 1 " \ la yo,I pox•, I R 1 u_ a•.4._ST \ Q I C 1 I l m' r• la.ruff]\ 1 ;\\1a 2a, 7.75 26z zs3, .mQ • In I' e. L V W 4 :„ • ? 2 V .24,3 r. ,j 243 LI d5t t41 • 4 ela1 N; 1 t. I_i re 1Tr .,•i ix, .r.6in . mow Pas , 1.1441'•i',4 R—I1 'I MIL omiiii Vol 264. r. , . 6, w iiiL. 1 i j 1 11. =CI a, \. it uo . I ` T— T x % \\\ '''. , I •.• "'"1.I11-.4.•.. e..,,• ..,•'-4i • 1.- .., p, 4,t1.. .7:- i 1\: z :J . 7:1,.. . r 7 ti54 L44 75i 72a 71_, rrti6, 3 l4,i WASH 1 1 ..i I ,\ I i 1. ti ii,.4 I zee Iz 7 11tLc .G1 r 01.' R-1. ['I 1_, 7 .. iiiik .. 0 ,. il JL4//:":"--.r— C' 4' 4 Tr — r=,.. LINCOLN PROPERTIES R-073-84 APPLICANT LINCOLN PROPERTIES TOTAL AREA — 9.7 ACRES i PR I NC I PAL ACCESS LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH EXISTING ZONING P-1, PUBLIC USE EXISTING USE GOLF DRIVING RANGE PROPOSED USE 186 UNIT MULTI—FAMILY DEVELOPMENT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN LOW DENSITY MULTI—FAMILY, HIGH DENSITY MULTI—FAMILY, GREENBELT COMMENTS LINCOLN PROPERTIES R-073-84 October 12, 1984 Page 4 b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The applicant has demonstrated that the subject site should be reclassified subject to site plan review. 2. The area in which the subject site is located has undergone considerable change in the approximately 25 years since the subject site was last reclassified. These changes represent both the physical, the construction of I-405, the Coulon Beach Park, new housing units along the Lake shore, as well as planning and policy related, modification of the Comprehensive Plan for the site, reclassifications of adjoining properties and other properties in the vicinity. 3. As indicated, the Comprehensive Plan designated the site for greenbelt, more than likely intended to protect the easterly steep slopes, and high density multifamily housing development. The applicants' eventual proposal, although not binding at this stage, would comply with those designations. The steep slopes would be preserved and the apartment complex, while less than high density, more than reasonably was designed to meet the constraints of the site. 4. The request in the main appears timely, services can be readily extended to serve the site and appear to have the capacity to handle the site. The extensions would be developer financed. The development will add to the tax base and should not tax the City's infrastructure any more than other residential development. 5. The nature of the proposal, the sensitivity of the subject site, the need to vacate and possibly create new roadway configurations, and the access directly onto Lake Washington Blvd. would appear to indicate that site plan review and a public hearing with staff input should be required. 6. Based upon the above analysis the City Council should approve both the rezone of the 7.9 acres of the first recommendation and the 1.8 acres of this recommendation. At the applicants' request both items will be submitted concurrently for Council review and consideration. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the request to reclassify the subject site from R-1 to R-3 subject to the execution of restrictive covenants requiring site plan review. ORDERED THIS 12th day of October, 1984. 434-4-%--- Fred J. Kau n Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of October, 1984 to the parties of record: John Phillips 2001 Western Avenue, Suite 555 Seattle, Washington, 98121 TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of October, 1984 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Gene Williams, Policy Development Department Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle LINCOLN PROPERTIES R-073-84 October 12, 1984 Page 2 has complied with that intent per the site plan submitted at the public hearing of September 18, 1984. The applicant will be responsible for all major improvements to the frontage of their property, water and sewer will have to be brought into the site and meet all city codes both for fire protection as well as domestic water supply. Further review was given on the greenbelt areas, traffic improvements, improvements to Lake Washington Blvd. and Burnett Avenue, rezone criteria, public improvements in the area, and the timeliness of the project. The Examiner made note for the record that there was no one in attendance except staff and Mr. John Phillips representing the applicant. He stated the hearing is merely a summary as the proposal was completely reviewed at the September 18, 1984 hearing when this portion of the site was omitted. The record will incorporate the complete yellow file as well as the minutes and tapes of the previous hearing so everything is on the record. The applicant's representative was identified for the record: John Phillips 2001 Western Avenue, Suite #555 Seattle, Washington, 98121 Mr. Phillips advised he would like his previous testimony to be incorporated as part of the record as he did previously review the recommendations and testified as to the matters addressed by staff. He again stated he feels this is an appropriate rezone as this piece of property ties in well with the other portion of the property to make a development of 186 units. They have submitted a site plan that is tentative and as the project develops they will be coming in to staff to review that plan again. He discussed the site plan review procedure and stated he is in agreement with the recommendations and requirements of the city. He requested that this proposal be approved. The Hearing Examiner called for further testimony, or comments from staff. There being no one else wishing to speak, the hearing was closed at 9:18 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Lincoln Properties Company, filed a request for approval of reclassification of approximately 9.7 acres of property from P-1 Public/Quasi-Public) and R-1 (Single Family Residential; minimum lot size - 7,200 sq ft) to R-3 (Medium Density Multifamily Residential). The original legal notice inadvertently omitted reference to the R-1 portion of the property which was approximately 1.8 acres in size. This small parcel was the subject of this second hearing. The following findings and conclusions are extracted from the original Recommendation of the Hearing Examiner. All the background information considered for the original 7.8 acres applies equally to the subject 1.8 acres. The original rezone application number is still attached to both reports. This report should be read in conjunction with the first report. 2.The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.2IC, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject site is located on the east side of the 2000 block of Lake Washington Blvd. North. The subject site is the location of the Golf Driving Range. The site is immediately west of I-405 and east of Coulon Beach Park. The northern entrance to the Park is approximately 250 feet south of the subject site. OF R4,1 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ZS' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9° co FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-25930, 9gTFD SEPTE P October 3, 1984 Mr. John Phillips 2001 Western Avenue, Suite #555 Seattle, Washington, 98121 Re: Rezone #073-84 - Lincoln Properties Restrictive Covenants Dear Mr. Phillips: We have attached copies of the Restrictive Covenants covering the above referenced rezone proposal for Lincoln Properties. Would you please have all parties sign this document before a notary public, and return the original to this office. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to give us a call . Sincerely, FRED J . KAUFMAN LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk Enclosures cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, ANNA PHINNEY AND MARJORIE LOTTO are owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive: covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and cover ants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigns d, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: SITE PLAN REVIEW The subject property, as described in Exhibit "A", shall be subject to Site Plan review, after a public hearing, as set forth in City Ordinances. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the coven ants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordindnces of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further docurr entation. Any viola tion or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedure; in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners ad oining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. ANNA PH NNEY MARJORIE LOTTO STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of 'KING On this day of 1984, before me personally appeared the person(s) who executed tle within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and volunt.iry act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year fist above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at EXHIBIT "A" Lincoln Properties R-073-8 Legal description of property (If more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Lots 357 and 158 C D. Hillman ' s Lake Washingan Carden of Fden . nivision No 5 , si mare in King C'nunry , Wachir l'r^ Tracts 340 , 341 and 343 , and Vacated Tracts 342 and 359 , ALL in C. D. Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden No . 5 , as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats , on page 83 , records of King County ; TOGETHER WITH that portion of Lake View Blvd. (104th Ave . S .E. ) vacated by Order of the County Commissioners , which attached thereto by operation of law; EXCEPT that portion of vacated Tract 359 conveyed to King County for road by deed recorded under Recording No . 1029408 ; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON OCTOBER 9, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: LINCOLN, PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC. Applicati bn to rezone approximately 1.8 acres of property from R-1 to R-3 for future multi-family development as part of an application to rezone 7.9 acres of property to accommodate approximately 186 dwelling units, file R-073-84; located along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard north at the 2000 block currentl) the site of the Renton Golf Range). A legal cescription of the file noted above is on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON OCTOBER 9, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISH =D: September 28, 1984 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANE TTE SAMEK-McKAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Piibli in and for the State of Washington residing :no,,, on the 28th dayL19.4.'„ of September. 1 Z, SIGNED: V 1 L / AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE Of WASHINGTON ss. County cf King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: ThEt on the 28th day of September 1984, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this tb day of j 1984. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at p therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: R-073-84 - LINCOLN PROPERTIES The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) 0699E September 28, 1984 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: LINCOLN PROPERTIES, COMPANY, N.C. INC. FILE NO. R-073-84 LOCATION: East of Lake Washington Blvd. North, approximately at the 2000 block. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval to rezone 9.7 acres of property from P-1, Public Use, and R-1, Residential-Single Family, to R-3, Residential-Multiple Family, for a future multi-family development having approximately 186 dwelling units. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval subject to signing of Restrictive Covenants. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on September 12, 1984. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hear;ng was opened on September 18, 1984, at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. 1 he following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application and other documents pertinent to this proposal. Exhibit #2 - Assessors Map Exhibit #3 - Site Plan Exhibit #4 - Revised Site Plan per request of the ERC The Hea ring Examiner opened the meeting and it was immediately noted that the publicati bn for this proposal did not include the R-1 property. The Zoning Administrator, Roger Blaylock, advised that the P-1 property covered approximately 80 - 85% of the site. The R-1 property will have to be published and notices posted, and be considered at a future hearing, possibly in the form of a summary procedure. Mr. Blaylock presented the staff report stating this property was designated in the Comprehensive Plan as high density multiple-family, greenbelt and low density multiple family. He stated it is unknown or discussed in the Comprehensive Plan if the golf driving range WE s looked at when the plan was done as a greenbelt, because of its function. They could find no justification of the fact that the golf driving range was to remain a permaneit greenbelt structure. There is to be a 186 unit complex in this proposal, and Roger B aylock reviewed the eight ERC conditions set forth in the staff report. The site has beer used for filling in a quarry operation. Some of the slopes on the site are 30 to 40% grades. The slopes are covered with heavy brush and trees. It was noted that in order to develop this area a major water main will have to be extended from the north to the site. Mr. Blaylock stated concern was expressed as to entrance to this site as well as to the Gene Coulon Park. It was felt the accessibility to the park may be inhibited due to the traf`ic generated from this development. It was felt there would be approximately 1050 trips per day. He stated the final design of Lake Washington Blvd. has not been finalized yet, and expressed concern as to the traffic on Lake Washington Blvd. at peak hours a: it is now the overflow corridor for I-405 traffic. Widening of the Blvd. was discusse j, but it was felt this concern could be addressed in the building permit stage. LINCOLN PROPERTIES R-073-84 September 28, 1984 Page 2 The Zoning Administrator continued with discussion of setbacks, and it was noted that the swimming pool abuts the property line and is not considered a structure due to its height. Parking is provided in the setbacks which is permitted because this is a rezone request and not a conditional use permit request. The site is currently a golf driving range and there are 2 trailer pads on the site which have been there for many years. The rezoning of the adjacent property known as Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park, supports the requested rezoning of this site. Major utility lines will have to be brought into the site, improvements to designated intersections will have to be done, there is no major social impact. There is a possibility of conflicting times between the Park and this project with regard to parking. Mr. Blaylock stated another concern is the ultimate site development because in the area, several streets run in odd patterns. Portions of Lake View Blvd. have been vacated and portions have not. This makes it a city street and must be constructed to city standards, with 20 ft. setbacks from the driveways. The applicants have the option of trying to vacate the streets to reduce the standards or applying to the Board of Public Works for a waiver or deferral. He stated they are not looking for the streets to be rezoned; rezone only covers the property and if the streets were vacated the applicant could utilize them. Based on all of the above information it was felt the rezone is proper, timely and should be recommended for approval to the City Council The Hearing Examiner called for testimony from the applicant or their representative. Responding was: John Phillips 2001 Western Avenue, Suite 555 Seattle, Washington, 98121 Mr. Phillips commented stating the applicant supports the staff's recommendations with the exception of one of the conditions. He continued with an overview of the proposed development. He stated they take exception to condition #g on Page 6 of the staff report which would require utility extension along the eastern margin of the site and along street frontages, with a connection to Meadow Avenue. There is no problem with utility extension along the east margin, but do not agree this is necessary along the street frontages. He stated the utilities will be brought in along Lake Washington Blvd. and will extend up through the site as approved by the Public Works Dept. He feels to be required to run a complete new set of utilities along the eastern portion of the property would be excessive and would not be used for serving this property - but would be used for some other property. The applicant also feels the street connection to Meadow Avenue should be deleted as Meadow Avenue is on top of a hill, and their engineers have advised him that they could not construct a street up to Meadow Avenue as the developer would have to go straight up through the greenbelt area which is in excess of a 40% grade. They also do not feel it would be wise to bring traffic through this property whether it be the single family traffic or the multi-family traffic. He requested the Examiner to grant the rezone as they feel the proposal satisfies all of the conditions of the ordinance and requirements of the staff report. The Examiner called for further testimony in support of the application. There was none, but Bob Bergstrom from the City Engineering Department commented regarding the requirement for utilities along the east margin of the site and along the street frontages by stating the City does have a low pressure water system along Lake Washington Blvd. to serve up to an elevation of about 150 ft. Everything above that point needs to come off and there will have to be a water main extension from the east down into the project site. He stated there is a 6 inch line coming down Lake View Road which is an unimproved street, but it does not have adequate capacity to provide adequate fire protection. He said there will have to be some extensions and loops required to serve these properties. He stated the whole residential area on top should be served off Meadow Avenue N.E. to provide fire access and emergency vehicle access to Lake Washington Blvd. There was no further testimony in support of the application, or in opposition to the application. There was a question from someone in the audience and after being affirmed by the Examiner, responding was: John Peterson 1150 Sunset Blvd. N.E. Apt. #107 Renton, Washington, 98056 Mr. Peterson stated he is interested in developing property to the north and wanted to discuss the proposed extension of the water line in that area. He was advised to contact the Engineering Department. He had no further comments regarding the proposal. LINCOLN PROPERTIES R-073-84 September 28, 1984 Page 3 The Hearing Examiner reiterated the R-1 portion of the rezone request had not been considered today due to the fact it had not been published. It will be reposted and published and will be heard again in two to three weeks. He requested that there be a representative for the applicant in attendance at that hearing. There being no further testimony or comments, the hearing was closed at 9:55 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1.The applicant, Lincoln Properties Company, filed a request for approval of reclassification of approximately 9.7 acres of property from P-1 Public/Quasi-Public) and R-1 (Single Family Residential; Minimum lot size - 7,200 sq ft) to R-3 (Medium Density Multifamily Residential). The legal notice inadvertently omitted reference to the R-1 portion of the property which will therefore, not be considered in this recommendation. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5.The subject site is located on the east side of the 2000 block of Lake Washington Blvd. North. The subject site is the location of the Golf Driving Range. The site is immediately west of I-405 and east of Coulon Beach Park. The northern entrance to the Park is approximately 250 feet south of the subject site. 6. The majority of the subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1791 in September of 1959, as amended by Ordinances 1800 and 1804, adopted in October and December of 1959 respectively. The property was automatically zoned G-6000 Single Family Residential) upon annexation. The major portion of the site consisting of the driving range was reclassified to P-1, its current designation, in October of 1961 by the adoption of Ordinance 1914. 7. A previous application for a similar request by the applicant was not completed. 8. The subject site was quarried earlier in its history resulting in a level area adjacent to Lake Washington Blvd., and very steep slopes along the eastern third of the site just below I-405. The elevation differences approach, and in some cases exceed, 100 feet yielding slopes of approximately 50% in places. 9. A reclassification of the subject site would allow development of a multifamily complex. Such a complex could accommodate approximately 186 dwelling units per conceptual plans submitted to the ERC (which only place an upper limit but not necessarily lower limit upon development density). Population predicated upon such a scheme would approach approximately 465 persons (2.5 per unit). An increase of approximately 47 school age children would be estimated to result (.25 per unit). The complex is estimated to generate approximately 1,042 trips per day 5.6 trips per unit) with trips spread out over the day but concentrated usage in the AM and PM peak hours. 10. The ultimate housing density of the proposal, both of the subject site and the omitted property, would be approximately 19.2 units per acre. Similarly, the figures in finding #9 above represent both the subject site and the omitted acreage. LINCOLN PROPERTIES R-073-84 September 28, 1984 Page 4 11. The existing traffic conditions will deteriorate along Lake Washington Blvd as a result of the proposed Lake Terrace Apartments proposed for the site immediately north of the subject site on the site of the Mobile Home/Trailer Court. The Level of Service (LOS) will drop to E. the build-out of the subject site would be expected to add to this diminished level of service. Turning movements will become more difficult both at intersections with public streets and driveway intersections of private property entering onto Lake Washington Blvd. 12. Public Works indicated a street connection to Meadow Avenue North should be accommodated by the subject site. The slopes in excess of 50% appear to preclude such access through the subject site. 13. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of high and medium density multifamily development and greenbelt, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 14. The ERC review resulted in the protection of the steep easterly slopes as well as requiring the applicant to participate in a series of traffic improvements not only for Lake Washington Blvd but also surrounding streets. Included were left turn lanes, widening projects and merge lanes. 15. There have been a number of new short plats in the areas north of the site. The Lake Terrace rezone was approved for the property immediately north of the site, and the Quendall PUD approach was approved for property further north. Coulon Park was recently expanded across the street from the subject site. 16. Utilities are generally available within the immediate vicinity of the subject site. While extensions will be necessary, the systems have the capacity to service the eventual development of the site which the R-3 zoning requested would permit. CONCLUSIONS 1.The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, will not impair the public health, safety and welfare, and in addition, is in compliance with at least one of the three criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The applicant has demonstrated that the subject site should be reclassified subject to site plan review. 2.The area in which the subject site is located has undergone considerable change in the approximately 25 years since the subject site was last reclassified. These changes represent both the physical, the construction of I-405, the Coulon Beach Park, new housing units along the Lake shore, as well as planning and policy related, modification of the Comprehensive Plan for the site, reclassifications of adjoining properties and other properties in the vicinity. 3. As indicated, the Comprehensive Plan designated the site for greenbelt, more than likely intended to protect the easterly steep slopes, and high density multifamily housing development. The applicants' eventual proposal, although not binding at this stage, would comply with those designations. The steep slopes would be preserved and the the apartment complex, while less than high density, more than reasonably was designed to meet the constraints of the site. 4.The request in the main appears timely, services can be readily extended to serve the site and appear to have the capacity to handle the site. The extensions would be developer financed. The development will add to the tax base and should not tax the City's infrastructure any more than other residential development. LINCOLN PROPERTIES R-073-84 September 28, 1984 Page 5 5. The nature of the proposal, the sensitivity of the subject site, the need to vacate and possibly create new roadway configurations, and the access directly onto Lake Washington Blvd. would appear to indicate that site plan review and a public hearing with staff input should be required. 6. Based upon the above analysis the City Council should approve the requested reclassification of the subject site. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should approve the request to reclassify the subject site from P-1 to R-3 subject to the execution of restrictive covenants requiring site plan review. ORDERED THIS 28th day of September, 1984. Fred J. Kaufm Land Use Heari Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 28th day of September, 1984 to the parties of record: John Phillips 2001 Western Avenue, Suite 555 Seattle, Washington, 98121 TRANSMITTED THIS 28th day of September, 1984 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Gene Williams, Policy Development Department Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before October 12, 1984. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. 71\- -. • J.[1 ._ i i 1111 j 'j11'.1 I t - , 1_i. 1 t] rl i LEE' , II lll K(NM/OAI( OP r.G &3-J- 4 iJ 111III • EIEMEMTAItrliitlitSS ill III W - VAi - ArI. — l'z-' 1 I o tillI. t» t)e tti tto 4 t7° 101. 1"1 1 ' Via Ill .' ii5 . -- 4—_ t _11 - .I AAS L- as f::I t DAIE t a LIONS MO.I 13/1 r t a PARK as`r Sr w[ l O MN 'L7 c. . bd• e I 511 N 3):\. F a J 281 l.1) 262 2,3 9 2 0 a s N W 6tliSS is. f/ n9 7 2V ,Z65 57. u 2a3 51 I 2i I1 .N11 aI.-1. 4, ,, °till:. , I . 1 A 0, ... i . sz. ..tvdr I \ ZSZ VII t31 11 bffig t 1 WA t i im --mmalEIP. ° t1i te6 r / .. taS mJ. ,,© S 1 J j:j M7 J ?j0 • ' -+ •' .`y 249• a 246 73I 726 tit.t r 24 Lh.CF WASH t J:r t4.Q 1z) 1 eh 1 I _IL --- la.:;,1 U 1`Ili:4 i,(1. - 1 71---41- LINCOLN PROPERTIES R-073-84 APPL I CANT LINCOLN PROPERTIES TOTAL AREA - 9.7 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH EXISTING ZONING P-1, PUBLIC USE EXISTING USE GOLF DRIVING RANGE PROPOSED USE 186 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN LOW DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY, HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY, GREENBELT COMMENTS 1077Z CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The appli:ations listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC. Application to rezone 9.7 acres of property from P-1 to R-3 for a future multi-family development having approximately 186 housing units, file R-073-84; located along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block (currently the site of Renton Golf Range). CF OWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application to rezone approximately 8.0 acres of property from B-1 to R-3 to allow construction of approximately 200 multi-family dwelling units, fit R-067-84; located approximately 150 feet north of N.E. 4th Street, between Monroe Avenue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E., between the 3700 and 3800 block of N.E. 4th Street. 1087Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 APPLICP NT: LINCOLN PROPERTIES FILE NUMBER: R-073-84 A. ' SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval to rezone 9.7 acres of property from P-1, P :JAc Use, and R-1, Residential - Single Family, to R-3, Residential - Multiple Family, for a future multi-family development having approximately 186 dwelling units. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Anna Phinney, Marjorie Lotto 2.Applicant: Lincoln Properties Company, N.C., Inc. 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) East of Lake Washington Boulevard North approximately at the 2000 block. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department. 5. Size of Property: 9.7 acres. 6.Access: Lake Washington Boulevard North 7. Existing Zoning: P-1, Public Use. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-1, Residential - Single Family; R-3, Residential - Multiple Family; and H-1, Heavy Industry. 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan:High Density Multi-Family, Low Density Multi-Family and Greenbelt. 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on September 7, 1984, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by city ordinance on September 7, 1984. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The majority of the subject property (parcels 340, 341, 342, 343, 359) was annexed into the City of Renton by Ordinance #1791 of September 8, 1959, which was later amended by Ordinances #1800 of October 13, 1959, and #1804 of December 8, 1959. Upon annexation, the property was zoned G-6000, General Use Cl 3ssification. 1 he zoning on the majority of the subject property (parcels 340, 341, 342, 343, and 35 )) was changed from the G-6000, General Classification to P-1, Public Use with the passage of Ordinance #1914 of October 17, 1961. Zciing on the remainder of the site (parcels 358 and 357) was changed from G-6000, General Use, to R-1, Residential - Single Family with the passage of Ordinance #3634 of June 13, 1982. This ordinance adopted a new zoning map which co nbined several single family designations into one zoning classification. The G-6000 classification was a single family designation. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER LINCOLN PROPERTIES: R-073-84 SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 2 Another rezone application was applied for in 1981 on all the parcels (340, 341, 342, 343, 357, 358, and 359) to change the zoning on the property from P-1, Public Use and G-6000, General Use, to R-3, Residential - Multiple Family, but the review process was not completed on the application. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The site has been used as a fill area for a quarry operation once operated on the site. Steep bluffs from the quarry still exists in the northeastern porton of the site and to the southeast of the southern portion. The site generally slopes to the west. The western three quarters of the site is nearly level. 2. Soils: Alderwood Material (AmB). This soil type has been disturbed through urbanization and no longer can be classified as part of the Alderwood series. The soil is moderately well drained. Permeability in the upper, disturbed soil material is moderately rapid to moderately slow, depending on its compaction during construction. The substratum is very slowly permeable. Available water capacity is low. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil is used for urban development. Alderwood and Kitsap soils (AkF), very steep. Soil type consists of mainly Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam and Kitsap Silt Loam. Drainage and permeability vary. Runoff is rapid to very rapid and the erosion is severe to very severe. The slippage potential is severe. These soils are used for timber. 3. Vegetation: The majority of the site is covered with grasses. Along the eastern most portion of the site is covered with brush and dense tree growth. 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: No water was observed on the site. 6. Land Use: The subject site is used as a golf range. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The area surrounding the subject site consists of a mobile home park to the north; undeveloped property to the east and south; and Gene Coulon Memorial Park and Lake Washington on the west. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: a 6-inch water line dead-ends on the subject site to service the trailer park. The line comes from a 16-inch line at the intersection of Meadow Avenue N. and N. 26th Street. b. Sewer: An 8-inch sanitary sewer line extends along Lake Washington Boulevard North adjacent to the subject site. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water flows into the Lake Washington drainage system. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3.Transit: METRO Transit Routes 240 and 340 run adjacent to the subject property along Lake Wasington Boulevard North. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Kennydale Elementary School is approximately .3 miles northeast of the subject site. b. Middle Schools: McKnight Middle School is approximately .9 miles to the southeast of the subject site. c. High Schools: Renton High School is approximately 1.9 miles southwest of the subject site. 5. Recreation: Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park is directly across from the subject site on Lake Washington Boulevard North. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER LINCOLN PROPERTIES: R-073-84 SEPTEMI3ER 18, 1984 PAGE 3 G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-718, Public Use (P-1). 2. Section 4-7094, Residential District (R-3). H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER O1-FICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1.Section 4-3014(C), Change of zone Classification (Rezone). 2.Northeast Renton Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1983, p. 40-45. 3. Residential Goals and Objectives Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1983, p. 14-16. IN PACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems: Generally, development of the subject site will have a minor impact on the natural systems. However, development of the subject site will increase storm water runoff which can be mitigated through proper development controls and procedures. 2.Population/Employment: The proposed multi-family project is expected to generate approximately 465 people (186 dwelling units x 2.5 persons/dwelling unit). 3. Schools: Development of the proposal will add approximately 46.5 persons to the school system (186 dwelling units x .25 students/dwelling unit). 4.Social: Minor. 5.Traffic: The multi-family development, once built, is expected to generate approximately 1042 trips (186 dwelling units x 5.6 trips/dwelling unit). J.ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, the Environmental RE view Committee issued a final declaration of non-significance on August 15, 1934. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building & Zoning Department. 2.City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division. 5.City of Renton Police Department. 6. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 7. City of Renton Policy Development Department. 8. City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department. L. DE PARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1.The applicant, Lincoln Properties Company, is requesting a rezone of 9.7 acres of property from P-1, Public Use, and R-1, Single Family Residential, to R-3, Multiple Family Residential. The project would consist of approximately 186 housing units for a density of 19.2 dwelling units per acre. 2. The Environmental Review Committee has reviewed the proposal and issued a declaration of nonsignificance with the following conditions: Development shall be limited with the contour elevations illustrated on the site plan submitted to the Building and Zoning Department on August 3, 1984. Ten (10) feet of property along Lake Washington Boulevard shall be dedicated to the City for future street improvements. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER LINCOLN PROPERTIES: R-073-84 SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 4 Lake Washington Boulevard is to be widened to three lanes per approval of the Public Works Department. Provide 100% funding for cost of installing center lane left turn lane to site at Lake Washington Boulevard and Lakeside entrance. Provide off-site improvements to Lake Washington Boulevard for the full forty-two (42) feet of right-of-way including curbs, gutters, street lighting, etc., abutting the property. Street improvements required for Burnett Avenue North and Lake Washington Boulevard North: southbound merge lane on Lake Washington Boulevard from Burnett Avenue North (300 L.F. at 10/L.F., $3000 at 5.32%). The assessment due to the City of Renton at the time of building permit issuance shall be $160. Street improvements required for Lake Washington Boulevard between Park Drive and Houser Way: widen 800 lineal feet of Lake Washington Boulevard approximately 9 to 10 feet (800 lineal feet at $8/L.F., $6400 at 10.19%). This assessment due to the City of Renton at the time of building permit issuance shall be $652.16. Street improvements required for Lake Washington Boulevard and Garden Avenue North/Park Drive North: upgrade traffic signal controller for roadway widening ($15,000 at 10.19%). This assessment due to the City of Renton at the time of building permit issuance shall be $1,528.50. Total assessment amount due of $2,340.66. 3.The site is currently developed into a golf driving range without any residential units on site. The facility has been operating for approximately 25 years. 4.The Land Use Hearing Examiner must review four specific criteria under Section 4-3014(C) to determine that the circumstances surrounding the rezone request are adequate to recommend approval of the reclassification to the City Council. The following evidence clearly demonstrates the rezone request is appropriate. a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. The subject property was annexed into the city in 1959. In 1961, the property was rezoned from G-6000 to P-1, Public Use, to allow the construction of the golf driving range. In 1981, an application was received to process a rezone request on the entire parcel to R-3, but it was never completed because, at that time, the Environmental Review Committee, based upon the information available, issued a declaration of significance. Presently the ERC has issued a declaration of nonsignificance with conditions. The original Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 1965 for this area, is modified by the Northeast Plan in 1981. It does not appear that there has been substantive consideration of rezoning the subject property in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan since the adoption date of that plan. b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. The proposal is generally in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan designations of High Density Multiple Family, Greenbelt, and Low Density Multiple Family. The majority of the site appears to be classified as High Density Multiple Family along with the consideration of the eastern portion of the site for Greenbelt. The Environmental Review Committee has specifically considered a site plan which protects the eastern portion of the site. PRELIMINARY REPORT Tu 1 HE HEARING EXAMINER LINCOLN PROPERTIES: R-073-84 SEPTEM 3ER 18, 1984 PAGE 5 c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. The subject site was primarily rezoned in the early 1960's. Since that time, major developments including the construction of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park, Interstate-405, and the development of major road and utility systems within the Kennydale area have placed a general development pressure upon the entire area. The rezoning of the adjacent property known as Lake Terrace Mobile Home Park in 1983, also supports the applicants request to rezone. This appears to be the next logical step in developing this area into high density multiple family residential uses according to the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. d. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of timeliness. The subject property is the next step in the development of the general area east of Lake Washington Boulevard. Major utility lines and specific requirements of the Environmental Review Committee show that the site can be adequately serviced by public utilities and services. Redevelopment of this site will be less of a social impact than the development of the mobile home park site to the north because it involves a relocation question. It appears that rezoning of the subject site, at this time, is appropriate and timely. 5. Various City departments have reviewed the requested rezone request. The Utilities Engineering Division has recommended approval without conditions. All of the other departments responding have recommended approval of the project subject to the following conditions: a. Parks and Recreation Department: Approval by Traffic Engineering as to the impact on Coulon Park is essential. b. Fire Prevention Bureau: Water utility improvement will be required in order to meet required fire flow demands. Access roads on-site will be required to meet local City ordinances and Uniform Fire Code. The fire alarm system required to be approved by the Fire Department and monitored by approved central station location. c. Building Division: No development or excavation into Greenbelt area shown on Comprehensive Plan Map, i.e., steep slope area (specifically delineated by the Environmental Review Committee). d. Traffic Engineering Division: See attachment for proposed improvements and proposed assessment amount. (These assessments were specifically included in the ERC decision.) e. Police Department: Solid core doors and deadbolts, adequate illumination and building conspicuously identified. PRELIMINARY REPORT i u THE HEARING EXAMINER LINCOLN PROPERTIES: R-073-84 SEPTEMBER 18, 1984 PAGE 6 f. Policy Development: Policy Development listed several areas of specific concerns that were identified by the ERC including access, traffic analysis, recreation facilities, and compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. g. Engineering Division: Full street improvements, including a bike lane is required along Lake Washington Boulevard North. Utility extension required along east margin of the site and along street frontages. Street connection up to Meadow Avenue should be required. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the rezone request, file R-073-84, be recommended for approval to the City Council. u = hl I Il `D 9LC1 LIlll1.. of all E F_-0 45t J D- 11 1 iniiI NENNYDAIE Li OP 4 R l 111 11 4! 44. as SCH l- 1 sr I l 11 1171 -- v .. ir I ai'tilJI To. 259 tDs 25e zzl - 1:: 'Er: -_ - - zD7 z zz\ \\ r ' .-i1, i; - W': 4a 7 174'—G- Z.... as .a 0 r r. IA ---it a ins tant • 7;4. 2sa I 2s 2 Z, iLIONS a _w C - 7I. Ril PARK It' e, w as.r ST - U u E J4i p am.31 , c 11\ . \ Q P C , ar ,I ,d a mo.m, z• so A 285 7 l3 262 253 9 Z 7 Q2 r 4flii ph 77• 1 11 Pr n9 1 7 Z Z ",Z63 52 W 2A3 g3a 225 5% I la A. f 1:I.Jet , 11T W _ i1;i01( limm\\ HT : i :: : TijI;ijt 7.4 R.1 I• ( k r91 ze6 r / .1 r its zialo..12 ma L '' I >w 1 1 . .-lea L ' J r 1 i i. 0\ r I zl» .v _ . ZuI _ I • , M7 I ? 790-- • ri . e. ' 243, a 246 731 728 7:4 i' J .. i':4_1/.,.1 . •1onN2_1.Q.: •:il 7 \ - - Lh.:l WASH I 7."e 11......'i_"_ I i 1 !, { a I tee zve 1 2 .7 ` Tariy _i4I_ 250 2 29 ` G1 RICal ; B kl•A.j " R—1.. , ... ---I 1 f LINCOLN PROPERTIES R-073-84 APPLICANT LINCOLN PROPERTIES TOTAL AREA - 9.7 ACRES PR I NC I PAL ACCESS LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH EXISTING ZONING P-1, PUBLIC USE EXISTING USE GOLF DRIVING RANGE PROPOSED USE 186 UNIT MULTI—FAMILY DEVELOPMENT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN LOW DENSITY MULTI—FAMILY, HIGH DENSITY MULTI—FAMILY, GREENBELT COMMENTS 7•- 4 C. Sutss%.cr rl,• p IIItVre %. titNa i::::-., :-......t LAKE 02.•, ,..::,i4iii:4 „,,,,f,0 4 WA S H I N G T O N i 1 r 1 aaaa. I 1/'° f. ,::,I/00 0°' i ,iiiiJiiii Imes i ii c Mb- • A.V.!„..,Vowliz„,„iiiimilliOl.:::;..i: (V A7NEWNT o 1E1111 lu 'oo d31 • • • • • •, • • •• • \••• i,,,wl elmonI ••, ,w. 00000iiplkill1) 1 000a v+ S: MiinEi ‘a ° ° 0• •1i •• • • • • •, • • • • • •, Ana . 000° tl, •°000'•'• • • • • • • • • • • • • • Analr.. 000°a°•°: • • fir TQ I IN, 2,, -° o• o 1 °o°o°o"o°• • • • • •• • •• •• O • • • , • i;I: i rmi• -,, i I".1.... 0 0 0 0 rii ,...•,•.x.• t__ 00000 0 0; ,. • • • •.• ' •••••• •• ,c3 \ y o t-_ agog 0 00, i • • • • 1 t I ''° agog 0 0°0 `t • • • oo 'o' R t "000 0 000„• `)a••••••• y 11.-.00%. o 000°o,0000'a461 ...000. 0 0°0, f.::: :<s____:.ni •• • • `• • r L, ,' mar t " °°O O °, r• .... a ii, 000 0 0000b•••••• i:i;E??;:c: : iii • • • • • ,, o o i •°o° ° 000°: A • • "::• E: ;#'I riiil' qv: F et,Aj, o wino.. o o agog . • • •J I: i -':`' nu tto 00.0..c, 0 ,—' 1 0000 0°o°. t' t.- 1 uu mi' - 1./rt 1 'ooao 0 000°. o.o•o• iC• .o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ii ;oo°o 0 gaga°; :0000. Sl•': II is 7E o0 o 0 0 0 o o m•.' 7 •',• 000a 000 00 0o a 11 0000000, 1 1 •° 0°°0°0 0°°o°o°Oo'• '°o° :' iiii:' Ir/ kratii: o°o°o°o°oo000000ulr10so0o00tiouI000olQ000J 7/ J 000 o' i • 00OOpOOAy007aJaaao00000 •., o•`r o 00 0hIo00000 o 1lo .aaaaa . Io o0000100oaaaao41, r • agogoo0000•ly: . 1tu l' W a, 0 0 Oo0000 0' 1111 i/i .. Oo 000•'o'o\ t / o o°°o°00000°000° o, 0, 00o,000 oo 1111 000 • t1y6Qt I 0000ogopo0o0o.e - .....11.Tr. 1 o00000c00oOIJ vs 11/H,.i --J/ IU, aIllik1/jyjjj j J 7 .II//// i 7 1 . 00 • .y ••':'r{a{:5t{: 'r'• •0000 Oc 11 rQR61111/ , Iimstt1PJ'4 °.. aaaa. k, r. (' llr r.I'00'0000000000 p,,.ma NEI.__ ; E, p EI[.1 .//•.°O°Otenomogogog° ° ° •..I.11/r-J,- y K A- t,, r/r IR 1 ir?,O m J. 111 aa • i .... up - j iti4•ry r•;1. p'gOQ..(',°•c. aa li ' / 11//./1..11•1 . '.. p:F> y`,,.it•cto ct,,. mammy.-• 11 I .%• 11 . JJ• Jy -:•(*,t] ,- . •' , r,,r e 1':•i3r ,.'}1, . ; t, r, u cX>t•'. unu!i1r J ,. crc It •dn ./.*t: c 3 'n 'fb r °,^ [''rrk1111"1111 Y'• ,• 2t'O 11 Till. l•.`n•EI:V 't..' 00k-' .>.,7 46 3!,r,:11 ' mmmn! I!uur, _AIME!, o;`;o 11.,, i%-- r r'-•f 0; •a ,,--,•• 11 g..:::i:; ::„.-..:.::iii ti...,6. m to m .i:..:.AMiiiii;1 pi k '"*.t ..,:‘,..K?:::%.,,:,,;,7 4 - 7i 3SiFi"n o . 1:' A 1 4 5;,.1 7 ate,• Op000 ti, .,• 4'c t 't7Z iiji o . I oo E.•>. lu .,ot,jA•,c,;i,r•iYa j:000 oo• l':.1j htt: gc;:rCa.t,n c•, „`,,,` yV. OOOr00O• l. 7 . ., ,,, .00000•.Vic'. — --- It,*':`a" ^,`17:.'r3 `:ii`'. rt. 4!.,•• tca1 ,,. i++.0000000 ----- fi/ °\ 3_000000. oaoo 0°. if:**i:i:i:*:.ea,Oraaaa°° r= $ 0, __tea LAND USE ELEMENT t" k _____ I Single Family Commercial i ,•€1 Low Multi-Family Office / Office Park 3. s. oaaaaoa w '0 Y Medium Density 0000aoo: Public/Quasi—Public aaaaaa) r :,, ' ae° MutiFamily aaaaaaa• A '. " rtfe, High Density Light Industrial ivr +.;c. t, r; ': 3 =Multi-Family IndustrialrRecreationf.... Heavy Greenbelt Manufacturing Park 11; i f gnndyc N., i yy y 0 M 1,'. li li ' 016. i C7 na na: i l:'''' L1- ii: F". • If• - - - ?, 1- • I i- 7q. t-•,..° Ac. VS* • it, k. N •••\ • M... , j, l,, f ft<, A[ l, u... k : l f 1 ,\ \ 0.\ ` O• I \` a a. iwn2Nn2° = oinutt I- 1 1' : r p j 6 t.• , A-' erg t . 1 . \•-, \ 1 4j.wikiii,.70r laU 1 . . I s. /./; 44, 17 ; 1••.•... " ; 42 . 4:.• . 7'-‘ 0 it i ..:.:-..:(..: 4114: 0 a 1-.— 31 dr egij tol 11. 1--.. ',...‘• t r • /...... : - R • Q1-) ' t4., :•:,.: k..' at, :•••,: i. .. • .., . : . ,. . .,,.,_„,,,, awl s \ 1 , A ‘,. a .•,•. it lid, -, V",: „ At, ..•..... , ti-;-.. l ., . . ram 1 \ .\' ' . 3' . : i ii I \ 1/44 1 ell aS i iF 0 ; • •. i • il tA \ ...":- •,:\' t I') \ !`.. . ''..:`..., n, 1 : I. 11°.:•)- 4,\,\‘'........ . 1.... v.il C:_ ; 1. 1. 1 . ; 14k 0' --)) 1 ) ) V )\\‘ .. . oI i ••• p . 9 . :,..... :•...:........, , i• 3.\. .. ... . 4 i, 1 I ', 0: i •.' Y,' ., ,.-?.., •'''' ..• A' \ Id 2 3 0 t_..,„--— • I v od • \ % i C t' 1.\ \ • ki' 1 7.— I [ ... t.. 1...!' ti6 .,. 11. .. . .... AS !! \ f,^, - ..,....,,, r-. .„..... ,, .. 11 i. \\ \ ri- eNI Au, adoad: 1'; • •',' i i .'+ •` I 1 • r: an• : i-`. c. t i: d is r to,z,,,,, , 14. r''' SE' f' 3-..:,:,..* . 41.4- I f , kil4I or / / „./^ C s)---24101 wwrsri..ww• OO Idts r p oI yr., Qii/ />'( 4 . r :/ vvricri-40. :70m, i' AIOVjC - \\ b4pL, 1/4 o ' 141 ' <' cco00VII. i.til oT4N ) 1 'fi 41 r,,,/ , iti 4.,.....,\ irl: 44101, iL. 7--- k\1/4.,....vil, /01..... .,,,,_ N-- ------ N.,--..'' _. - \ ''77/;I( 1.--„---------- j,, lit •:7,-_-___________ ..... 1. -\ V cl.s\ i''•, , ',: per 77 ,- c-ill\I!; i fir. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION No(s) : REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE: THE LAKESIDE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROEPRTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. (CURRENTLY THE SITE OF THE RENTON GDLF RANGE) SITE AREA: 9_7 Af RF.S BUILDING AREA (Gross) : N/A DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : x x 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: x 3 ) Water & Water Courses : x x 4) Plant Life:x x 5) Animal Life: x 6) Noise: x 7) Light & Glare: x 8) Land Use; North: MOBILE HOME PARK East : UNDEVELOPED South: UNDEVELOPED West : MUNICIPAL PARK, LAKE WASHINGTON Land Use Conflicts : MINOR View Obstruction: MINOR 9) Natural Resources : X 10) Risk of Upset : X 11) Population/Employment : X 12) Number of Dwellings : 186 x 13) Trip Ends ( ITE) • 186 X 5.6 = 1042 TRIPS Traffic Impacts : ALONG LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 14 ) Public Services : X 15) Energy: X 16) Utilities: X 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19) Recreation:X I20) Archeology/History: X Signatures: Ronald G. Nelson Michael P ess Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor dlLfP(/' drA. PUBLISHED: AUGUST 20, 1984 Ri and C. Hought9/n APPEAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 3. 1984 - Public Works Director FINAL DECLARATION OF—JN-SIGNIFICANCE LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC.: ECF-070-84, R-073-84 AUGUST 20, 1984 PAGE 2 5. Provide off-site improvements on Lake Washington Boulevard for the full 42 feet of right-of-way including curbs, gutters, street lighting, etc., abutting the property. 6. Street improvements required for Burnett Avenue North and Lake Washington Boulevard North southbound merge lane on Lake Washington Boulevard from Burnett Avenue North 300 LF at 10/LF $3,000 at 5.32%. The assessment due to the City of Renton at the time of building permit issuance shall be $160.00. 7. Street improvements required for Lake Washington Boulevard between Park Drive and Houser Way widen 800 linear feet of Lake Washington Boulevard approximately 9 to 10 feet. 800 LF at $8.00/LF. $6,400 at 10.19%. This assessment due to the City of Renton at the time of building permit issuance shall be $652.16. 8. Street improvements required for Lake Washington Boulevard and Garden Avenue North/Park Drive North upgrade traffic signal controller for roadway widening. 15,000 at 10.19%. The assessment due to the City of Renton at the time of building permit issuance shall be $1,528.50. The total assessment amount dues of $2,340.66. INFORMATION: The southeast portion illustrated on the site plan dated August 3, 1984, does not meet City ordinance. Private parking cannot extend onto city right-of-way as shown. SIGNATURES: Ronald G. Nelson ichael Parness Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor 7( 2- c Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: AUGUST 20, 1984 APPEAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 3, 1984 0494N FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): R-073-84 Environm.ntal Checklist No.:ECF-070-84 Description of Proposal:Application to rezone 9.7 acres of property from P-1 to R-3 for a future multi-family development having approximately 186 housing units. Proponent: Lincoln Property Company N.C., Inc. Location of Proposal: Located along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block (currently the site of Renton Golf Range). Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on July 3, July 11, August 8, and August 15, 1984, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton, Gary Norris, Jerry Lind, James Hanson, E d Wooten, Gene Williams, Ronald Nelson, Roger Blaylock, James Bourasa, and Robert BE rgstrom. Incorporal ed by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-070-84 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Scott B. Springer, dated June 18, 1984. 2.Applications: Rezone (R-073-84). 3.Traffic analysis prepared by Transportation Planning and Engineering Inc., June 1984. 4. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities Engineering Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Policy Development Department, anc the Police Department. 5. Ret:ommendation for more information: Parks and Recreation Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a sic nificant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21 C.03)(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons fur declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject rezone request is issued this final declaration of non-significance subject to the following conditions being complied with: 1.Development shall be limited within the contour elevations illustrated on the site pla i submitted to the Building and Zoning Department on August 3, 1984. 2.Ter (10) feet of property along Lake Washington Boulevard shall be dedicated to the City for future street improvements. 3. Lake Washington Boulevard is to be widened to three (3) lanes per approval of the Put lic Works Department. 4. Lake Washington Boulevard and Lakeside entrance provide 100% funding for cost of installing centerlane left turn to site. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIeTfN : I=,,,.,,,,.`'s n APPROVED 7 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED COMMENTS :. Fd/ 5104 _TAAp/OveriAe -a/S / ii: c-LI-s" P`ik 4,,, , /rci, 'ci cebv5 Co/ . tc.s4 Phif - u-kofy 674C44-5;al', t-- - 16 oc,„01, Lu. (.1? i1D /',D,.Lou/ A c 5 'V tnU 1 r41 Re.4 ,S/L DATE :7/ eV SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR1AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIE ING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : i fie`•/lI APPROVED C APPROVED WITH CONDITION El NOTE PROVED TIl1TT APPROVAL SUIECT TO 29/4 32 r 5 s,s r ATE COMERS AIAEEMEIT • WATER No 7,-- , 2i ATE COWERS AOIEEMEIT • SEWER CAC_pZ- OA/2 •94 —i, -!f. r,v/34.0-,A-.ti STEM ()HERMITi`»AI$E • irATEI y 7S Y?see Bch / STEM IEVEIIPMEIT CURSE • SEVER 1/,F5 , %/rfS°-'AGr P cl LArrf PHIAL ASSESSIIEIIT AREA CRAKE • WATER /No PERM ASSESSMEIT AREA MICE • SEWER A/d 4 6y k4 PROVER WATER PIA? i/„ j PPIOVED SEWER PtAI 7EdsL I 61-yx & PROVEI FIRE 1T11AIT IICATIIIS IT FIRE SEPT.f11•e S',.y Sew,-_- IN FIIW AULTSIS s tC S i . . s ADATE : t 2 eT /14: SIGNATURE OF DIREC OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE T' REVISI(// a- Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : i, /C/c 2 'u(-'/NC ,(---//Vc n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED C 7/:3- ib(E'_ I1 J 'l, ' I )c•I c_•`vec"-ts IL„ +' f i,c-cc.4 c. c, 7F=C_= Jl 01- c.__ / -2 ,,3 L_ DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTH IZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 KtV1tW!NG UhF'AK iMEN I/1)1V1S10N : APPROVED PROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Ai°d-) c Q sv-ii 0,0 66Z 45 SA/toe-J/Ll ©4 Cow E. SST ' -5 Jq-‘2' C DATE: Z 2---)7KSIGNATURE0- II ' CTOR OR AUTHORIZ D REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :711:A-et 2-APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 8_1581 gadtat 24.1 c--,),Z,74. ad DATE : Zr-ell SIGNATUR OF DIRFIOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED C-"APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED f f g o V ff e_ /3 le/3 P F/ C c ' /4.) oti u , A cS `To P /fie 7- C"5' c D J d S gt, A DATE : SI NATURE OF DIRECTOR R AUTH.r'' IZED REPRES NTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVFTfN : v/r- L ( APPROVED X NrvROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED l/ / C t ` % .cr e- - wLN. _4, L ,„:,e . t i 1 C C am . 7. 4 Cl/•,1—.--, "<1 ; G7--7 --04 e.t.y_L-Y _G<.e Ge , LG,:iV t/f./4,/ i'eC Z` . /7L Cz u—,.c lG.C-f, 3, —C,G.o--ram em—, ,. r `/ e,c7ti-e c>, ,' e c-A/7t J 0VrA/ - ( DATE :i- '.-. SIGNAT R. OF I • ' TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 11NOT APPROVED Aleef', 41VA 7,,fig,,,,..,,,. c&T14.444A44"4-_at0-t-cesurr 1.467411cZ/„± frta.:d GPAtP C S a ?-4tar)us. 4 Is i /s/ ?,,c-re 14,....e. 8,44. , g410., 0et...6 , 441-. . furM. r";-4.1ta41' 4L,r1(4411•4411?:::i; . 4 f E lt /'9 DATE : 64?1/ sy SIGNATURE OF DIRE/OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 4/so See G(ffaedf) REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 We recommend approval of the rezone request subject to any conditions that might be applied by the Environmental Review Committee, and subject to the following limitations: The Comprehensive Plan designates the area for High Density Multiple Family Residential and Greenbelt. The Greenbelt is clearly intended to restrict development on the steep slopes of the east and northeast portions df, the site. Therefore, the steep portion of the site should not be rezoned to permit intensive development. However, the existing P-1 zoning is inconsistent with this aim. Furthermore, the High Density designation might allow R-4 zoning, but an adjacent rezone to the north was limited to R-3 density. Therefore, the site should be rezoned to R-3 with restrictive covenants prohibiting development of any kind east of approximately the 85' contour line. In the relatively flat east centralortion of lots_340 and 341, the development limit could be the 110' - en - line. (An alternative approach would be to rezone this eastern greenbelt area to G-1, but establishing a legal description would be difficult.) Another condition of the rezone should be the requirement for site plan approval of future development. id..(. )1, tilgew,:g— Giy ( i 0-1,44 eV OF RA,, s L BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT r RONALD G-.NELSON - DIRECTOR z o p9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • 235-2540 AO9QrFD SEP-Ir°.° P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR September 11, 1984 1 Anna Phinney 1000 Aberdeen N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Re: Rezone Application, File R-073-84; Located along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block. 11 Dear Ms. Phinney: il The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on June 18, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has bee scheduled for September 18, 1984. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representatives) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A co py of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions please call the Blilding'and Zoning Department at 235-2550. pcerely, 6frcisoe 971 Livail _.r& Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:cl 1090Z-2 o OF R 4 .)BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT r r RONALD G NELSON - DIRECTOR ZNAL ,, ..'A. p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055, • 235-2540 9,0 o• 0 Q gTso SErc*-- BARBARA Y. SHINPOCI- MAYOR September 11, 1984 Marjorie Lotto 201 Union Avenue S.E. i Renton, WA 98056 Re: Rezone Application, File R-073-84; Located along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard N rth at the 2000 block. Dear Ms. Lotto: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on June I8, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has beOn scheduled for September 18, 1984. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representativ (s) cf the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff rdport will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any question , please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. • Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:cl 1090Z-3 i I c) II i I OF 1R A 0 `} ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z RONALD G.--NELSON - DIRECTOR O, A MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • 235-2540 Ao91TFD SEP E Q, BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR September 11, 1984 1 1 Scott Springer Lincoln Pro erties Company, N.C. Inc. 11400 S.E. 6tli Street, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Rezone Application, File R-073-84; Located along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block. Dear Mr. (Springer:I The City o Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on June 18, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for September 18, 1984. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Btilding and Zoning Department at 235-2550. I 1 1Sincerely, V gRo er J. Bla Flock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:cl 1090Z II 1076Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENT N LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECONDI. FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1904, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC. Application to rezone 9.7 acres of property from P-1 to R-3 for a future multi!family development having approximately 186 housing units, file R-073-84; located along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block (currently the site of Renton Golf Range). CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Application to rezone approximately 8.0 acres of property from B-1 to R-3 to allow construction of approximately 200 multi-family dwelling units, file R-067-84; located approximately 150 feet north of N.E. 4th Street, between Monroe Avenue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E., between the 3700 and 3800 block of N.E. 4th Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department! ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS .ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : SEPTEMBER 7, 1984 Ronald G. Nelson 4 !Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE M. SAMEK-Mc AGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED rBOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing in on the 7th day of Septembe , 1984. U^1 ) o SIGNED• ilJ tleugw 6 0 °C) ICE Q. 111 9ATeD SEPSe O City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a puBLIC HEARING . in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , 'CITY HALL ON SEPTE13ER 18, 1984 BEGINNING. AT. 9:00 A.M. P.M.. CONCERNING: FILE R-073-84 X REZONE From P-1 To R-3 SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION . of Lott PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM GENERAL LOCATION . AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCAILU ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF 'LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK, CURRENTLY THE SITE OF THE RENTON GOLF AGE) LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION, SIGNIFICANT CANON—SIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING& ZONING DEPARTMENT' 235-2550 • THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT U,M,V,TV :+,MWFIN RVMM., dW:"'*R.,. ..:T.! Or T.lam:_k 92, 11 I i REN' BUILDING & ZONING DEP 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R1073-84) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 200 BLOCK. CURRENTLY THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/3/84 ENGIINEERING DIVISION l ] TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILiITIES ENG , DIVISION RIFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 11OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JULY 2, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ] NOT APPROVED G .1C-Gee-gA c-e..67r.6ec/le dZ „ I, tea/ /44. . -. - a, QL o o per, .ems'e ,yam .c f C- c_. e,, 4 •' 7G.ci cc Gt.,r/ 7/,' v 1 AZ/DATE : G 5(z7` SIGNATURE OF i ' ; OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 c+,.v..., ,0 7 4 ,, RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 = __ _84 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT : L NCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. . INC. JUN 2 Z 1984 POLICY PROJECT TITLE .THE LAKESIDE DEVELOPMENT WEPT. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR Ai FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALONJTHE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 200 BLOCK. CURRENTLY THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) TO : I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/3/84 ENGINEERING DIVIS ON n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVIION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING '& ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ei OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , ' PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JULY 2, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EINOT APPROVED 10441, 1 ji frete4dAps ,lr a tdAte' ,S a7t,40410).tase ,S ifICI Sys BL - , 1/4'1 3) i) L€4 , ' . oilL,nottier4,4;7 et 4.64€0.6.40„,, / / / 4., ckp DATE : ‘,479t8r SIGNATURE OF D REVFOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MS d)0 Sec culfade REVISION 5/1982 July 2, 1984 Policy Development Department Rezone Recommendation Lincoln Property Application (R-073-84) We recommend approval of the rezone request subject to any conditions that might be applied by the Environmental RGview Committee, and subject to the following limitations: The Comprehensive Planl designates the area for High Density Multiple Family Residential and Greenbelt. The Greenbelt is clearly intended to restrict development on the steep slopes of the east and northeast portions of the site. Therefore, the steep portion of the site should not be rezoned to permit intensive development. However, the existing P-1 zoning is inconlsistent with this ern. Furthermore, the High Density designation might allow m R-4 zoning, but an adjacent rezone to the north was limited to R-3 density. Therefore, the site should be rezoned to R-3 with restrictive covenants prohibiting development of any kind east of approximately the 85' contour line. In the relatively flat east central_ ortion of lots 340 and 341, the development limit could be the 110' `-sentem- line. (An alternative approach would be to rezone this eastern greenbelt area to G-1, but establishing a legal description would be difficult.) Another condition of the rezone should be th requirement for site plan approval of future development. 4Lt)4. K $G4-r 14v-N eY I I I REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP 'WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATIONS NO(S) : REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC, PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY4 DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOC4TED ALONJ THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 200 BLOCK. CURRENTLY THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) TO : El PUBLIC WO KS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/3/84 ENGI EERING DIVISION l ( TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED. HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Fl BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE ;DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SU GESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON JULY 2, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ;F; n APPROVED 2APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED V 1 e_ 4 c9 74- o.t) 6,g ff—T-- S eAl Al 41 7- - i o a 71-1 1 , SST O o DATE : SIGNATURE 0 I C OR OR AUTHORIZ D REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP fMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. . INC. PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALONUTHE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 200 BLOCK. CURRENTLY THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/3/84 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : E UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT I ( POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JULY 2, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 4Litec_ APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EINOT APPROVED I 8-158-/ 3-441(1 likt.e_c4tliza_ rease_44,f4-2„.„_- e.'1144441-1-4(a-90 111-4411-4-teill÷-6<adir edzic.affkiir o - inc-6 F c' DATE ; SIGNATUR OF DIRTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 inn REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP [WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. . INC. PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALON3 THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 200 BLOCK. CURRENTLY THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/3/84 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I ( POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JULY 2, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED R-APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED fr rp/cw,L /3 Y liAFF/c e //1)[-;L-S7?/, 6- cr S 1 G- 7—/,¢- t- l is Or ( a. ,DATE ' f-7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR R AUTH IZED REPRES; NTATIVE REVISION S/1982 REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP FMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALOE THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 200 BLOCK. CURRENTLY THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) TO : L ! PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/3/84 TREENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION I ( FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU l IPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ! OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JULY 2, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : F-ti,c-ckv,. n APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ell NOT APPROVED COMMENTS :Fil/ Sired -TAngOued cebtA5 tu,s4 4,4 -p1(445,„,., Ji S, cd sil sl e s b S t d octketvyfc( Lp ink a Act/ vt44ou v ReS1)A, DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN' BUILDING & ZONING DEP FMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C.. INC. PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALONLTHE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 200 BLOCK. CURRENTLY THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/3/84 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1AUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT l ] BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1-1 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M , ON JULY 2, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 4 Fl APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITION El NOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SYSIECT 11 2- /32-r 2 S LATE COMERS AOIEEWENW WATER O LATE COMERS AIIEEMERT SEWER y Co*_a ' '-2 4.94 r W:34401,4 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT :am • WATER y„O/7s:''7 er e1/40 SYSTEM SEVEIIPEEIT CUM - SEVER yk-s , /7 °-- r edc1 Lei/f SPECIAL MESSIEST AREA CNAICE - WATER Aic SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHANCE • SEWER Aid 4 cam- 6./4 LAPPROVESWATERPLANi/,ES J ;12 APPROVED SEWER PLAI u St t. l APPROVES FIRE NHRANT L_OCATIONS x IT FIRE DEPT. FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS y 5 S DATE : 2? U SIGNATURE OF DIREGIOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISIO REN' 1 BUILDING & ZONING DEP 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. . INC. PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALONUTHE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 200 BLOCK. CURRENTLY THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/3/84 ENGINEERING DIVISION R1TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JULY 2, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 9FA-7c c&,(---/4 n APPROVED ErAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1NOT APPROVED aC Gile h day 1 ro fe_, to v Co 5 SS 5 e7 RIZ DATE ' s b / SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 0487N NOT1Lt OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following projects: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC. (ECF-070-84) Application to rezone 9.7 acres of property from P-1 to R-3 for a future multi-family development having approximately 186 housing units, file R-)73-84; located along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block (currently the site of Renton Golf Range). SE 4-VAN PROPERTIES, LTD., NORCON DEVELOPMENTS, LTD. E(CF-081-84) Ap3lications for final plat approval, file FP-082-84, and final P.U.D. approval of a 138 single family attached and detached development on 30.69 aci es, file FPUD-83-84; located at S.E. 8th Drive and Lake Youngs Way. S.E. CHG INTERNATIONAL (ECF-087-84) Application for final P.U.D. approval for Phase I of the completed phase of P.P.U.D.-050-81 (Earlington Woods P.U.D.), and application for a two-year ex^:ension of the P.P.U.D. for the balance, file FPUD-086-84; located at 603, 611 and 702 S.W. 5th Court. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects: BF.ECK SCOTT (SCOTT ANNEXATION) (ECF-076-84) AF plicatiion to annex 11.01 acres of property into the City of Renton; located on the north and south sides of N.E. Sunset Boulevard between Monroe Avenue. N.E. and Union Avenue N.E. CITY OF RENTON, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT (ECF-088-84) Application for Substantial Shoreline Development Permit to allow the construction of a hexagonal picnic shelter measuring 28 feet across, file SN1-117-84; located in the Cedar River Trail, along the east side of the Cedar River and approximately 2,500 feet south of Lake Washington. The Envi-onmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of significance for the following project: AI:KERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (ECF-085-84) Application for building permit to construct a single-faced advertising sign m3asuring 12 feet by 25 feet and rising to a height of 36 feet, file B-325; located at 36 Logan Avenue South. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action mist be filed with the Hearing Examiner by SEPTEMBER 3, 1984. Published: AUGUST 20, 1984 4 ;iA6f14,`b 4A,sr' N ANh`. 4 ^v F3WbF"S` ot h'or y` '. Nt 4 f 4 e. r r TSad. re't, r . r E f SF lA rt t 14 1 0 f3 y 11„1 4 b i;,).,,. „, , ,,,,,„:41,.„,,,, i ENviRoNmENTAL DEcLARATION APPLICATION NO. R-073-84, ECF-O70-84 PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION TO REZONE -9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TC R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 HOUSING UNITS. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LAZE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK CURD NTLY THE SITE OF RENTON GOLF RANGE), POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PIERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. r r a THEE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE t E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION w ODOES IDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE EN\nRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACT STATEMENT v DWILL XWILL NOT i, BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., SUM R 1'i. 1 z FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 0494N FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application Noss: R-073-84 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-070-84 Description of Proposal:Application to rezone 9.7 acres of property from P-1 to R-3 for a future multi-family development having approximately 186 housing units. Proponent Lincoln Property Company N.C., Inc. Location c f Proposal: Located along the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block (currently the site of Renton Golf Range). Lead Ager.gy: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on July 3, July 11, August 8, and August 15, 1984, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton, Gary Norris, Jerry Lind, James Hanson, Ed Wooten, Gene Williams, Ronald Nelson, Roger Blaylock, James Bourasa, and Robert Bergstrom. Incorporat 3d by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-070-134 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Scott B. Springer, dated June 18, 1984. 2.ApF lications: Rezone (R-073-84). 3.Tra'Tic analysis prepared by Transportation Planning and Engineering Inc., June 198 a. 4. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Dep artment, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities Engineering Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Policy Development Department, and the Police Department. 5. Recommendation for more information: Parks and Recreation Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject rezone request is issued this final declaration of non-significance subject to the following conditions being complied with: 1.De%elopment shall be limited within the contour elevations illustrated on the site plar submitted to the Building and Zoning Department on August 3, 1984. 2.Ten (10) feet of property along Lake Washington Boulevard shall be dedicated to the City for future street improvements. 3. Lake Washington Boulevard is to be widened to three (3) lanes per approval of the Public Works Department. 4. Lake Washington Boulevard and Lakeside entrance provide 100% funding for cost of installing centerlane left turn to site. FINAL DECLARATION OF 1N-SIGNIFICANCE LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC.: ECF-070-84, R-073-84 AUGUST 20, 1984 PAGE 2 5. Prcvide off-site improvements on Lake Washington Boulevard for the full 42 feet of eight-of-way including curbs, gutters, street lighting, etc., abutting the property. 6. Street improvements required for Burnett Avenue North and Lake Washington Boy levard North southbound merge lane on Lake Washington Boulevard from Burnett Avenue North 300 LF at 10/LF $3,000 at 5.32%. The assessment due to the City of Renton at the time of building permit issuance shall be $160.00. 7.Street improvements required for Lake Washington Boulevard between Park Drive and Houser Way widen 800 linear feet of Lake Washington Boulevard approximately 9 to 10 feet. 800 LF at $8.00/LF. $6,400 at 10.19%. This assessment due to the City of Renton at the time of building permit issuance shall be $652.16. 8. Street improvements required for Lake Washington Boulevard and Garden Avenue North/Park Drive North upgrade traffic signal controller for roadway widening. 15,000 at 10.19%. The assessment due to the City of Renton at the time of building permit issuance shall be $1,528.50. The total assessment amount dues of $2,340.66. INFORMATION: The south cast portion illustrated on the site plan dated August 3, 1984, does not meet City ordin Ince. Private parking cannot extend onto city right-of-way as shown. SIGNATURES: A k s Ronald G. Nelson ichael Parness Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor Ridhard C. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: AUGUST 20, 1984 APPEAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 3, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION No(s) : REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE: THE LAKESIDE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROEPRTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. (CURRENTLY THE SITE OF THE RENTON GDLF RANGE) SITE AREA: 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross) : DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE: INFO 1) Topographic Changes : x x 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: X 3 ) Water & Water Courses : x x 4) Plant Life:x x 5) Animal Life: x 6) Noise: x 7) Light & Glare: x 8) Land Use; North: MOBILE HOME PARK East : UNDEVELOPED South: UNDEVELOPED West : MUNICIPAL PARK, LAKE WASHINGTON Land Use Conflicts : MINOR View Obstruction: MINOR 9) Natural Resources : X 10) Risk of Upset : X 11) Population/Employment : X 12) Number of Dwellings : 186 X 13) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 186 X 5.6 = 1042 TRIPS Traffic Impacts : ALONG LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD 14) Public Services : X 15) Energy: X 16) Utilities : X 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics: X 19) Recreation:X 20) Archeology/History: X Signatures: Ronald G. Nelson Michael P ess Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor PUBLISHED: AUGUST 20, 1984 Ri and C. Hought9t APPEAL DATE: SEPTEMBER 3. 1984 _ Public Works Director OTTL I-TIE 5 Date circulated : JUNE 22, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2. 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE Brie f Description o f Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. (CURRENTLY THE SITE OF THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) SITE AREA : 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR • MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :V' 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : v'5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : V View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : L' 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : J li 15 ) Energy : 1% 16 ) Utilities : 1/ 17 ) Human health : 1/ 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI ,( DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : ?,.)4 Title : Z/7-/147' atjlil/t4E.E4 Date :44. FORM: ERC-06 PP'yR.K , Date circulated : JUNE 22, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2, 1984 ENIVIRONMEPITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. (CURRENTLY THE SITE OF THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) SITE AREA : 9,7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR - MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : 7-41/-f,'/c- 4)e e v g tied() of-L- % _s S gJs —, , -,.C7 a",/s . r%G d,I -C T Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : - ,_, / 1it1e : y7_e_ Date : G . v b- c/ l3 FORM: ERC-06 k)Ca I Nor IZi xi Date circulated : JUNE 22, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2. 1984 ENVIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. (CURRENTLY THE SITE OF THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) SITE AREA : 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 1 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : c/ 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : f-mil(R;/ec L k,A rc„ ,,.j ctI C0/ l,L, 6 /J - 0-46() CK s«. C J , 11cJ cd ofl 4..'ced0ps 6 s CDecek ? N. D O4/ rep,ir Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information 1 /7Reviewedby : Title : / / i' SA- Date : FORM: ERC-06 FIRE Date circulated : JUNE 22, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2. 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE Brie f Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. (CURRENTLY THE SITE OF THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) SITE AREA : 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR • MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : 67.2Ze-4,:A.)ev)a-at, vdelech./ C Zt - Clu c c-.c-CG/ vl7v+ Gy 2 c',cik., 4/ ct/30a'1/.JU N 2 2 1984 Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : Title : 1:6•1-e Date : FORM: ERC-06 12 LcG1 Date circulated : JUNE 22, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2. 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. (CURRENTLY THE SITE OF THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) SITE AREA : 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR . MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : K 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise :1( 7 ) Light & glare :3( 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : iv 1' 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : K 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : XC.ft 04,1-io,0 -5-4c,GV O AJ C—o- Recommendation : SI DOS More Information,- Reviewed by : Title : Date : 27 FORM: ERC-06 IP PFIL Date circulated : JUNE 22, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2. 1984 ENIVIR0NIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. (CURRENTLY THE SITE OF THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) SITE AREA : 9,7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : v 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : g6A 3. D flZ 7i Ftf/c S/E>'NAL L fi}.t•- lti/i N. traffic impacts : TuRN/N6 CQN/=L/rT'S E 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI `r DOSS More Information Reviewed by : title : /i c -e / > t Date : J S) V FORM: ERC-06 71111111 QEv'; Date circulated : JUNE 22, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2. 1984 ENVIRONIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-073-84) CITY OF RENTON PROPONENT ; LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. JUN 2 1984 POLICY PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE DEVELOPMENT s1FPT. Brief Dp2cription of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. (CURRENTLY THE SITE OF THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) SITE AREA : 9.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR . MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : G '-- 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : 7jfQ _- 43,t,r- L east : .neue Vac south : [Jr1.dev•el0pe d west : 'eye_ COtitor 2e,,,Lc L r e Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources :l 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment :v/ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 3S-A071s traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : I/ COMMENTS : 4'—' Mot\ f yt F( vv` p,.. S e c, t* t P C t eA (t c `(r• l ,5_f upe411-et- fC 7sr'5" Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : c;kre- AiSey Title : SSiSiez4167t-fro Date : 6/C9 ?/ 7 FORM: ERC-06 OL i C,Ci. Date circulated : JUNE 22, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2, 1984 ENVIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 070 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-073-84) PROPONENT : LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. PROJECT TITLE : THE LAKESIDE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 9.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM P-1 TO R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 186 DWELLING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH AT THE 2000 BLOCK. (CURRENTLY THE SITE OF THE RENTON GOLF RANGE) SITE AREA : 9,7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR • MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI I- DOS More Information Reviewed by : (Title :C- Date :C'/ _ Z1--84f FORM: ERC-06 MEMORANDUM August 13,1984 TO: Jerry Lind Bldg. / Zoning Dept. A; 3 Q4' FROM: Gary Norris a,—. gy' tJ Traffic Engineers 11 AUG 14 1984 SUBJECT: LAKESIDE APARTMENTS Please be advised that the latest submittal of the traffic analysis for Lakeside Apartments have NOT changed the proposed assessment evaluation of the proposed development for the transportation improvements . The estimated traffic volume differences between the count estimate for 1986 with and without the development have not changed. Gary A. rris PE cc: C E Morgan RENTON Development Rezone I w THE LAKESIDE AUG 14 1984 Lincoln Property Company n awu,ZONENG EPI. Due to the accummulative effect of anticipated growth of the subject area it is recommended that the following assessment be attached to the proposed developmen.. to help improve traffic conditions for that area. Traffic Vo umes Increase % Burnett Avg.. N at Lake Wash. Blvd. (with development) 2,275 - ri' without development) 2,160 115' nor 5.32% Lake Wash. Blvd. at Lakeside site (with development) 6,680 `15 Q,v without development) 6,340 2 y-0 340 d-4 5.32% Lake Wash. Blvd. north of Garden Ave. North with development) 8,595 " 15 without development) 7,800 7000 795 1'=' 10.19% Type of Improvement Assessment Value 1 . Lake Wash. Blvd. & Lakeside entrance PART OF DEVELOP- provide 100% funding for cost of installing MENT PLAN centerlane left turn to site 2. Provide off-site improvement on Lake Wash. Blvd. PART OF DEVELOP- curb, gutters and street lighting abutting property MENT PLAN 3. Burnett Ave. North & Lake Wash. Blvd. North southbound merge lane on Lake Wash. Blvd. from Burnett Ave. North 300 LF @ lO/LF 3,000 a 5.32% 160.00 4. Lake Wa;h. Blvd. between Park Dr. E Houser Way widen 800 linear feet of Lake Wash. Blvd. approx. 9 to 10 feet 800 LF t) $8.00/LF 6,400 @ 10. 19% 652. 16 Type of Improverm.nt Assessment Value 5. Lake Wash. Blvd. & Garden Ave. North/Park Dr. N upgrade traffic signal controller for roadway widening 15,000 @ 10, 19%1 ,528.50 TOTAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNT 2,340.66 Development Rezone THE LAKESIDE Lincoln Property Company Due to the accummulative effect of anticipated growth of the subject area it is recommended that the following assessment be attached to the proposed development to help improve traffic conditions for that area. Traffic Volumes Increase o Burnett Ave. N at Lake Wash. Blvd. (with development) 2,275 without development) 2,160 115 or 5.32% Lake Wash. Blvd. at Lakeside site (with development) 6,680 without development) 6,340 340 5.32% Lake Wash. Blvd. north of Garden Ave. North with development) 8,595 without development) 7,800 795 10.19% Type of Improvement Assessment Value 1 . Lake Wash. Blvd. & Lakeside entrance PART OF DEVELOP- provide 100% funding for cost of installing MENT PLAN centerlane left turn to site 2. Provide off-site improvement on Lake Wash. Blvd. PART OF DEVELOP- curb, gutters and street lighting abutting property MENT PLAN 3. Burnett Ave. North & Lake Wash. Blvd. North southbound merge lane on Lake Wash. Blvd. from Burnett Ave. North 300 LF @ 10/LF 3,000 @ 5.32% 160.00 4. Lake Wash. Blvd. between Park Dr. & Houser Way widen 800 linear feet of Lake Wash. Blvd. approx. 9 to 10 feet 800 LF @ $8.00/LF 6,400 @ 10.19% 652. 16 Type of Improvement Assessment Value 5. Lake Wash. Blvd. & Garden Ave. North/Park Dr. N upgrade traffic signal controller for roadway widening 15,000 @ 10. 19%1 ,528.50 TOTAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNT 2,340.66 0 July 30, 1984 AUG Mr. Roger J. Blaylock 3 1984 Zoning Administrator eUILD,NJG/.., City of Renton Building & Zoning Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: LINCOLN PROPERTY RE-ZONE FILE R-073-84, ECF-070-84 Dear Roger: I am in receipt of your letter dated July 18, 1984. In response to the letter I am enclosing: 1) Three (3) copies of a Conceptual Site Plan showing building locations, internal roadway systems, and all development below the 85' topographic contour: 2) Copy of a letter, with Exhibits 1 through 4, from Dodds Engineers, Inc. regarding access to Tax Lots 344, 345, and 346. You will also note that there is additional discussion regarding access to Lots 334 through 336 and Lots 338 and 339: 3) Two additional copies of the Traffic Study dated June, 1984. If you are in need of any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me. Yours truly, 24 '---42:17—iY-7 g Scott B. Springer Vice President SBS:pp Enclosures THE OVERLAKE BLDG. bmcohin PROPERTY company n.c., Inc. 11400 S.E.6th ST.,SUITE 220 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 206-455-4B13 Pr a DODDS ENGINEERS,INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEYING PLANNING RECEIVED J U L 3 01984 July 25, 1984 DEI Job No. 81010 Cr of REisilotg Lincoln Property Company IC 11400 S. E. Sixth St. J Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98004 AUG 3 1 ; 5: 1' Attn: Scott Springer Dear Scott; I have made an analysis of the practical methods of access to Lots 344, 345, 346 and the former railroad right-of-way east thereof at your request. To assist you in following the explanation, I've enclosed the follwing exhibits: 1. Exhibit 1: Portion of a Kroll Map showing the subdivision and adjoining roadways. (no scale) 2. Exhibit 2: Topographic map of the lots and surroundings. 3 . Exhibit 3 : ORB site plan for Lots 345, 346 and portions of Lots 334-336 , 338, 339 and railroad right-of-way. 4 . 2 'X3 ' Rezone map. Obviously there are a multitude of ways to provide vehicular access to all these parcels, especially if one were to erase the existing boundaries and rights-of-way. To limit the options to a manageable number, I will make the assumption that the access will be provided by the existing rights-of-way. Such an assumption is logical in that the status quo is not altered by the various proposals, i.e. : no existing property rights are assumed to be altered. The first observation I would make, and this should be obvious to anyone even remotely familiar with land planning, is that this plat was not laid out with much (if any) regard for topography. The plat was recorded in 1905 by C. D. Hillman and at the risk of being indelicate, Mr. Hillman' s record for producing plats which are "workable" today is dismal at best. The roads shown on the plat may have been buildable in the horse and buggy days of the early 1900 ' s, but their alignments do not conform in the slightest to the minimum criteria we must satisfy today. 4205 148TH AVE. N.E., SUITE 200-BELLEVUE, WA 98007 [2061 885-7877 OR 454-3743 Referring to Exhibits 1 & 2 the only roads which would stand a chance of being partially constructed today are Third Avenue from Lake Washington Blvd. N. to the westerly corner of Lot 344,and portions of Lake View Blvd. The lack of a 60-foot right-of-way along the west boundary of Lots 337-341 and the extreme topographic features (75 feet elevation change in 300 feet) would prohibit a 12-14% grade road along that alignment. The sharp, angular changes in direction of Lake View Blvd. south of Lot 346 would not allow sufficiently large curve radii to meet City standards. In my opinion, the only portion of the plat road alignments which could be constructed today is that on Third Avenue from Lk. Washington Blvd. to a right-angle tee where Third intersects Lake View Blvd. and thence southerly along Lake View Blvd. to a point near where the right-of-way angles to the east adjacent to Lot 356. At this point, an additional right-of-way would be necessary to provide for a cul-de-sac or an alternate alignment proceeding to the south. The topography on Exhibit 2 is somewhat outdated in the vicinity of Lots 345 & 346, please refer to the rezone map (Exhibit 4) for a more current data. Improvement of the foregoing roads would provide physical access to Lots 344, 345 and 346 along existing rights-of-way. Providing physical access to the railroad right-of-way east of Lots 340-346 is another matter. The current grade criteria for Renton' s public roads (12-14%) would cause a road constructed along the Third Avenue right-of-way to be at no more than elevation 150± (700 ' X 0.14 + 50) at the east boundary of the railroad right-of-way which is also the west boundary of I-405. This elevation would place the roadway surface 70 feet below the ground surface at that point. At the west boundary of the railroad right-of-way, the road elevation would be approximately 30 feet less or elev. 120±. The ground surface at that point is now 150+ or 30 feet above the maximum allowed grade. Clearly, this route is not feasible. This results in the conclusion that public road access to the railroad lot lying directly east of Lot 345 is not available via the existing rights-of-way. There are other options to provide access to this parcel however. Exhibit 3 shows one such option. I offer no judgement on the plan shown on Exhibit 3 other than to say that it illustrates how private land could be utilized to gain access to the upper portion of the hill . Exhibit 3 also illustrates a method to access Lots 337-339 and 334-336 . These lots could also be accessed from Meadow Avenue No. Notwithstanding the above, the only roads which could be built today within existing rights-of-way and would contribute in any way to physical access to these upper parcels are those I mentioned earlier on Third Avenue and Lake View Blvd. These roads will provide an adequate, if not the only, platform from which a road may ascend the hillside. In conclusion, there is limited improvement which can be undertaken on your project and its adjoining rights-of-way to help access to the parcels adjacent to I-405 . Improvment of Third Avenue and portions of Lakeview Blvd. will provide access to Lots 344-346. Other than providing a base from which other roads may be constructed over private lands, there are no other improvments on or adjacent to your site which will lessen the access problems to Lots 333-339. Yours very truly, DODD' ENGINEERS, INC. Bruce . Dodds, P.E OF RFCk 4S 6 V BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR c MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540p9 09gr6 0 SE '1°1"' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR July 16, 1984 Mr. Scott Springer Lincoln F roperty Company N.C., Inc. 11400 S.E 6th Street, Suite #220 Bellevue, Washington, 98004 Subject: Lincoln Property Rezone File R-073-84, ECF-070-84 Dear Mr. Springer: The above-referenced rezone application is currently under review by the Renton Environn ental Review Committee. In the course of our review it has been determined that additional information will be needed before the Committee will issue an environrr ental declaration. Specifically, more information is needed on the following items. 1. Site Plan: Provide to the Committee a conceptual site plan showing locations of future buildings, and a layout of the internal roadway system. This should be drawn to show development below the 85 foot contour. This site plan is for illustrative purposes only. 2. Access to Adjacent Lots: Site access is needed to three lots adjacent to the east (tax lots 344, 345 and 346). Provide information on how access can be provided to these lots. 3. Traffic Study: The Committee is in receipt of a new traffic study updating information received with the environmental checklist. Provide to the Committee, two (2) additional copies of this report. Please submit this requested information to the Building and Zoning Department at your earliest :onvenience so that an environmental declaration can be made for the requested building permit. Until this is accomplished, the application will remain on our agenda under pe iding business. For the Environmental Review Committee: eitIC-,g_q--- L1/416c-- — Roger J. Blaylock Zoning P dministrator RJB:JFL:dk:0999Z D July 11, 1984 CITY OF RENTt014 Mr. Roger J. Blaylock Lip (fir P3119ZoningAdministrator City of Renton JUL 13 1984 Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, Renton, WA 98055 RE: LAKESIDE REZONE Dear Roger: Per our conversation of today I am enclosing an updated Traffic Analysis com- pleted in June of 1984. If you are in need of any further information in connection with Lakeside please let me know. Yours truly, C;24* Scott B. Springer Vice President SBS:co Enclosure THE OVERLAKE BLDG. bincabn PROPeRTY company n.c., mc. 11400 S.E.6th ST.,SUITE 220 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 206-455-4813 fog.Acn\ iip,t__. THE LAKESIDE REZONE APPLICATION 0 4/RCOLR PROPCR79 Company June 18, 1984 f r 4 dull f rf'°11iiiii s IIM Allitili I llh I Isli II I I/ ) 1 I) i IIINr i III. I.L.y*Ill 1 1 I I liCi. 1 N I I ii6-1 r 1;( 1_____u_u L r jillr— n IIIIIflfl'II) lull I III' IIII n,•/II'I(lf('....r (l f,IIII piiiiiimilo-IF!-. t IIh 6 j li 1 NI A I i I I I' I loyogin,iI .. .I • UI ; .Ira.,IN 11 I I fIiiI il i mpr .II NiIi 1 lI . i I IIIIIII (INJI I I fal) JUN 18 1984 BuiLC;;a;.a;.,a NING DEPT. REZONE APPLICATION THE LAKESIDE JUNE 18, 1984 APPLICANT: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. 11400 S.E. 6TH STREET, SUITE 220 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 CONTACT PERSON: SCOTT B. SPRINGER 206) 455-4813 TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER LETTER MASTER APPLICATION OWNER'S AFFIDAVITS LOCATION MAP ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REZONE CERTIFICATE SITE PLAN AT 81/2" x 11" JUSTIFICATION LETTER TRAFFIC ANALYSIS UTILITY LETTER SOILS REPORT SITE PLAN - FULL SIZED (Contained in Pocket) ASSESSORS' MAP - (Contained in Pocket) 0 Mr. Roger J. Blaylock Mr. Jerry Lind Building and Zoning Department City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: REZONE APPLICATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF LAKESIDE Gentlemen: Enclosed herewith you will find seven sets of Lincoln Property Company' s Application for Rezone on the Lakeside property. Along with the application booklets we have enclosed the following: 1 . Seven copies of the King County Assessor map denoting Lakeside in green and illustrating all property within 500 feet thereof; 2. Seven copies of the Site Plan at 1" = 40' scale denoting the items set forth in the Rezone Checklist; 3. One plastic PMT 82" x 11" reduction of the Site Plan; 4. Seven copies of the Title Report (contained in the Rezone Booklet) ; 5. Seven copies of the justification for the rezone (contained in the Rezone Booklet); 6. One original plus six copies of the completed Application Form signed and notarized, together with Owner's affidavits, also signed and notarized (contained in the Rezone Booklet) ; 7. One original plus six copies of the Environmental Checklist Form contained in the Rezone Booklet) ; 8. Our check in the amount of $984 consisting of a $400 Rezone Fee and a $584 Environmental Review Fee. I have also enclosed copies of a Lake Washington Boulevard Traffic Study, Soils Report and Utilities letter, all of which are contained in the Rezone Booklets. THE OVERLAKE BLDG. wncal,n PROPCRry CO PanM n.c., Inc. 11400 S.E.6th ST.,SUITE 220 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 206-455-4613 Page 2 Messrs. Roger Blaylock & Jerry Lind Please be advised that it is our intent to pursue a Contract Rezone with Conditions, under the R-3 zoning designation. Please advise me as to what additional information prove helpful in an expeditious processing of our Application. Yours truly, Scott B. Springe Vice President SBS:co Enclosures P.S. The Traffic Analysis is now being updated. The updated version will be furnished when available. 1 Y o TY OF RENTCd T FILE No(S): o ; 7 Ii) EstyILDING & ZONING DEPARThncnT Lf C 70 ' MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of applicotion(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES Lincoln Property Company N.C. , Inc. ADDRESS XX REZONE*(FROM P-1 To R-3 ) $400.00 11400 S. E. 6th St. , Suite 220 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP n TEMPORARY PERMIT* Bellevue, WA 98004 QED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE l 1 SITE PLAN APPROVAL 0 GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT206) 455-4813 No. of Cubic Yards: i i VARIANCE CONTACT PERSON From Section: NAME Justification Required Scott B. Springer ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: Same as appl icant) n SHORT PLAT CITY ZIF TENTATIVE PLAT PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE FINAL PLAT 206) 455-4813 Q WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME I PLAT NAME: Anna Phiniey Marjorie Lotto ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 1000 Aberleen N.E. 201 Union Ave. S. .Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP ED FINAL Renton, W\ 98055 Renton, WA 98956 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE Q Residential ED Industrial aCommercial ED Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS D2000LakeWashingtonBlvd. No. TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING O PRELIMINARY Golf Dri v r ng Range P-1 FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Multi-fam ly Apartments/Condos NUMBER OF SPACES: XX ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE $584.00 SQ. FT. ACRES AREA:422,532 I 9.7 + I TOTAL FEES S984.00 L r-- STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE 'TAMP r d APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: t6ijie, 1) APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: JUN 18 1984 ""`Accepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: 3 . _ 'w"`e-, Q/ APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: f r' - C 2- 4 Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: 0 Building Design Eng. fp Fire pl Parks i+ Police CB Policy Dev. Traffic Eng. IS Utilities DCUICinu c i4 efnn~ SEE ATTACHED AFFIDAVITS Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). AFFIDAVIT I, being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner, =owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner) Address) Address) City) State) (Zip) Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a ccmplete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 41111 a Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Tracts 340 , 341 and 343 , and Vacated Tracts 342 and 359 , ALL in C. D. Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden No . 5 , as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats , on page 83 , records of King County ; TOGETHER WITH that portion of Lake View Blvd. (104th Ave . S .E . ) vacated by Order of the County Commissioners , which attached thereto by operation of law; EXCEPT that portion of vacated Tract 359 conveyed to King County for road by deed recorded under Recording No . 1029408 ; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. AFFIDAVIT ENitifInDMONfitliNniTHI _ OMAS H. PHINNEY , being duly sworn, declare that I am IZJaethorized representative to act for the property owner,Epowner of the property involved in till:; application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. The foregoing does not constute a contract to sell the property to my any third person SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 2 6t}, DAY OF Janugry 19_ r NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASH NGTON,RESIDING AT Ren n Nam€ o Not Publi )Signature of Owner) THOMAS H. PHINNEY Roger I. Lewis, Attorney at Lew 100 So. 2nd St.Bldg., 9. o. Box 273 1000 Aberdeen N.E. Renton,WA 98055.0273 226.4850 Renton, Wach. 98055 Addre ss) Address) City) State) (Zip) Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). T,nts 157 and 158 , C T). Hillman ' s Take WasEingtnn Garden of EdPn , Division No 5 , situate in King county , Washington AFFIDAVIT I•Marjorie L Lotto being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner, ®owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. This Affidavit is made in support of an application for reclassification of zone of the above-mentioned property to R-3 . SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS V 3 DAY OF 191 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHIN N,RESIDING AT Name of Nota ublic) Signature of Owner) o, 2G AI 9 ' `7 201 Union Avenue S .E . , #165 dl Address) Address) Renton, WA 98056 City) State) (Zip) 255-8678 Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form V174 i. B T C D T E STf 1 RHNVDAI[ N MTN NRCNIR ;- :L RAINIER 9RaR, rDleT x T. _ 2 R "R t BEACH K E N N Y 0 A L EII< sT S L(I, 1 N1® CH - T- 9 e y 4.,.' NOMTANI nrN...... LIENI®`. ;F' -ra.JRn YTT,... ST a( p\ y'4• COtLiatN 71TN ST 1 } -11.4,'.P Lake N NTH PI. { E'i f • i x 4L' N 'ATN ST r « 1. N°QT.,DTN S'R PI RIM z- -2T_. L.:,c (B F 9 N SSP.ji6g°LKFLw,„ s N i 301, sr NE YTn a E I ooPEH1y;9 r y g w Washington g ST S WO,. 6.1 e P fP 51 '_ r r5 9YAN 2 m5T NE 30711 ET S PR 11 ST 1. 4k4_pp f A ,L„ NNT q< e\ t N P1RR' N y yJ Cq l r fE` A r^ 1 ri.•vs pc yMy4 Q Al ilti l0 7t• N! jJ P , , OC q y • ur5. 1\ NE IL I s-ST- qjpAtiN. v` W.ISNW6TpV r STS HAT Y IP , NKN MRR + _ yRDp p NFSA pl N/S DRFW^EITA N v 9L PEc]n2TN iJ r l—T E N i h4VJ 1:1-N y y` W .. 'P $'8 113TN -N• V•+ ®_ nt I)1..ST 3 sr In . 11. S 114TNp ST 4 -.31 _\ 3 V.' O J $s . .S IISTXSP ' T A IIITN Bl1LIN6 y4wUcuSritiSIISTn 3 i •NLwG 1" nI ll SIILTn ST r-..T 16T« ®®, I' I • Oz >• I'> • $ ` •r.fm«al S S TN av sl 90EiK rT V• i < N n Try rii S 1' . L1 Ii II r S®I `- RE«POr. % 127 e.,s \,\ n ST s IrT S"8T« ST lBrr, .C 1 N I, 11 i Yf— S I«PL x S. . O pp8 n ®® > 4116,•rlPl• PLMT p•I.gr"S 5®€; N 4' 1. N IRTr. LJ © 1 1 z 8 ST to o 41 n x 3 I IN$IT c i2py,.,.n is i • w I eTN':,_CA."... R 1^.®_ I , - N SIN= ST 1 1SI T N s NRe> 11 a M;p 00-e- 1E I i I • • S ©® i T I I ` N . ,A 7:r=i > a m O Z n y S 1 2N In ST re RD 2"i•nn 1 II 'gyp N TTWS% 1eI S 123 ST a N .' I NCTNERS41. In s' `I 4 v N . 241 . 23 •Ft w ;: 1 1 PAR ' >< 1 y P $4T« . RaJs9 S s 124TN ST • *. 114 N 6 T i t; • J r3STNST. ~ ftTly L an® < E ..._' 0 TN N. Ii.r In ST a Sta - sill Es e. on II 7 A' 1 1N Po > vnRx o' 8 \ y \ 2TDN T a f-,'" :- 12'• '' s ' T«$ N, a I I\ I t R N r i Sts < SITEIi N r'J T12 Nr )'•5 67 T':• : J 'y z i I 1 s " a 5.N ., L „ \ 2 4• r 1 29r '$1STT\ sin• am S i2ATN- S S 24, ' I' 4L! t- \C52:1_,ILIMILI1M11 ST 13/ t 4ST J. 7TNN y S<Mtn q, t - R.PE • \%.:I NKNRIOfTM - ' I r. 4 i 4 NN. le . _ '' II V 0e/ r SISt<Tr 'I ISSTDN^SO ' S B «. lJ c R qCy ' F. s. MRPpRT r 1\ De E. O 1.jtR2s.NC I rtR a 137Np r S ISISSL:T 4 Y _ s sT 1 . 3 TILLICUN raeu I a M 9 S .33ND T eit rY t'4 s„.' fIz Iff W= S VIR Ru 3T i 7/' f''7I T/ 5 133T5134r«RL. i m S VIETCRM ST` hJ'J1eR' ® TEr. y Sil i r I«D 3„ (RENT N.S fi•' RI . 0 , S 17T« ST O Iy u NS.' ©_ ziOEI f0"004 . 43 O' 6.. , / .... MD• .L3.r . 1, .1E1d'-". cou rC.. s p i. °f iN SUNS T R PI ZI"oc N 3T s(}' th_' sr W O 5 •i© 41® sr \ ..' Rlr R1'E F IaoT EARII T ' r"' Sea ST 114. r I, hP r=Po Fr s ssrn sT 1'1 PL N, ` 3Ro ST '..EARL 1 a_ S i 1 . an ST > v 1 5 • 144 PST \-4-_ .,\\ ULF MRS[SN rTM o S_o 7TN s 5T N1 CENT I RrR+T sT B PM` CS D Ii I IE S'. l.'E ./, s,. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. R- 07,3 -"8 Environmental Checklist No. C.CI- - ('7( —87 PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance ElDeclaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being .used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Anna Phinney, Marjorie L. Lotto 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: Scott B. Springer, Lincoln Property Co. , N.C. , Inc. 11400 S.E. 6th, Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98004 455-4813 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist Renton Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Lakeside 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Pages 1-2 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Pages 1-2 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Pages 1-2 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST- PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Pages 1-2 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Pages 1-2 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes, explain : See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Pages 1-2 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed , but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: See NNVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PROJECT DESCRIPTION, Pages 1-2 II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YET— MAYBE NIO b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ?X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X YES MAYBE d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YET- MAYBE NB e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X rB MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YES MAYBE WU— Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Page 3 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES RATTE WIT b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE I c) Alteration of air movement , moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE Cr Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 3) dater. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X VAS MAYBEN c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE N d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YE XX S MAYBE N0 e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE W — f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YE MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters?X YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops . Xmicrofloraandaquaticplants)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? yr MAYBE NU— c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?X PEs- MAYBE AD— d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X PET— MAYBE R Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X T — MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X RATBT NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES M—KYTT WO-- Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES— MAYBE N0 Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an expTosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions?X YET— MAYBE WO-- Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X YES- MAYBE R Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FNVIRONMENTAI IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X V- WATTE NU- d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES M-B WU- e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE A- M Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE 0- Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE Nh b) Police protection? X T- _ATTF W5- c) Schools? X YES MAYBE N- d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services?X YES MMYbE NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES FIWYTE 1W0 b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES MAYBE WO- Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? X Y b) Communications systems? X vrs-- RATiir NB c) Water?X YES MAYBE NO I 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? YES- MARE N- f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES Writ- NO Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Vt MAYBE NT- Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES MAYBE go-- Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the Xqualityorquantityofexistingrecreationalopportunities? YE- MAYBE WO-- Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? yrS M B N Explanation: See ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION, Pages 3-6 III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent:signedr name pr nted City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROPONENT Anna Phinney, and Marjorie L. Lotto Care of Their Representative, Scott B. Springer Lincoln Property Co. , N.C. Inc. 11400 S.E. 6th, Suite 220 Bellevue, Washington 98004 455-4813 CHECKLIST SUBMITTED AGENCY REQUIRING CHECKLIST Renton Planning Department BACKGROUND I.6 Nature and Description of the Proposal : Proposal site is approximately 10 acres. The proposed zoning would allow not more than 186 dwelling units to be built. Conceptual design work has started, but will not be completed pending final rezone approval . Development would not approach maximum density allowed under proposed zoning. Sufficient on-site parking would be provided, as well as resident amenities, including swimming pool , recreation building, sauna, jacuzzi and lush landscaping. I.7 Location of Proposal : The proposal site lies uphill from Lake Washington Boulevard, above Gene Coulon Park. Well upslope from the project, to the east, is Interstate-405. The bulk of the project is a gently sloping terrace, currently in use as a golf driving range. This portion of the site is largely open, in grass or pavement. Approximately one-quarter of the site is on steep slopes, covered with brush and dense tree growth. Much of this portion of the site would be left in its undisturbed condition by the proposed rezone development. The site has views across Lake Washington to the west. I.8 Estimated Date for Completion of Proposal : The estimated date for completion is 12 months following project initiation. 1 I.9 List of Permits, Licenses and Government Approvals: Rezone to R-3; Building Permit; Street Access Permit; Right-of-Way Access Permit, Burlington Northern Railroad (sewer); Storm Drainage Connection Permit. I.10 No future additions, expansions or further activity related to this proposal is planned. I.11 Applicant has no knowledge of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by the proposal . I.12 Rezone application is being submitted concurrently with this form. Future applications will be made as required for approvals listed under I.9, above. 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - DISCUSSION See Appendix A for Checklist portion of Application Form) II.1 Earth Existing Conditions: The site has previously been used for a quarry operation. The upper substrata over much of the site is granular fill material left by this operation. The native soils below are a mix of sandy silts, gravelly and silty sands and similar compact, but unconsolidated, materials. See Appendix C for the complete text of the Preliminary Geotechnical Study prepared for the site. Impacts: Development of residential units would modify the topography to provide suitable grades for parking and building pads. This modification will include disruptions, compactions and covering of existing soils in those developed portions of the project. Mitigating Measures: The preliminary report (Appendix C) reveals no unusual or difficult problems related to earthwork development on the site. Conventional building practices, coupled with regulated control of runoff collection and release, will allow for development without creation of hazardous or unstable conditions. On-site cut and fill is projected to be roughly in balance. Excess cut would be disposed of off-site at an approved location. Moderate amounts of imported select fill will likely be needed to prepare suitable, stable subgrades for structures. II.2 Air Impacts: The addition of auto traffic generated by the project would be the only significant source of air pollutants from the proposal . Traffic volumes are addressed in the Appendix B, Traffic Analysis. Temporary particulate emissions are to be expected during construction. Mitigating Measures : No measures for auto emissions other than providing for smooth flow of traffic into and within the project are foreseen. Dust from construction work can be minimized by good operational technique as required by local regulations. II.3 Water Existing Conditions: There are no perennial or intermittent streams on the project site. The site is well vegetated, so runoff is well controlled and is largely limited to minor overland sheet flow. Substantial volumes of water are reabsorbed on the site. Impacts: Existing runoff and absorption patterns would be altered by removal of vegetation during site preparation and development of impervious surfaces. Absorption would be reduced and the rate and volume of runoff would increase. 3 Mitigating Measures: Detention and control of increased runoff would comply with City requirements (Title IV, Chapter 29) , including development of a drainage plan and submission for review and approval . II.4 Flora Existing Conditions : The site, at present, is vegetated, the lower and more level areas mostly in grasses; the upland slopes in brush and trees. Impacts: The proposal requires a major alteration to the more level portions of the site. Peripheral tree and shrub masses adjacent to property lines and Lake Washington Boulevard would bq retained wherever possible. The steep forested slopes would be left largely undisturbed. Mitigating Measures: The proposal envisions generous relandscaping of the site, both for internal amenity and as screening at property lines. This landscaping would potentially increase the overall floral diversity of the site. II .5 Fauna Existing Conditions: No survey has been done of existing fauna but the site has suitable habitat for numerous common animals and birds of the Puget Sound area. Impacts: Habitat destruction would largely be limited to the areas currently in use as the golf driving range, a habitat of limited diversity and productivity. Overall faunal diversity and quantity may decrease. Mitigating Measures: Landscape development could provide new or modified habitat. Upslope forest and habitat edges would be maintained and largely undisturbed. II.6 Noise Impacts: Proposal would somewhat increase local traffic noise. Whether an increase would be measurable is unknown. There would be temporary increases in noise levels during construction. Mitigating Measures: On-site mechanical equipment and construction equipment should be muffled and maintained. Construction work could be restricted to 7 AM to 5 PM hours. II.7 Lights and Glare Existing Conditions: Golf driving range has lighting for night operation. 4 Impacts: May be reduced by proposed change in land use. Mitigating Measures: Any site lighting for proposal would be designed to minimize off-site glare. II.8 Land Use Proposal would alter present land use from golf driving range to use in accordance with the local Comprehensive Plan. II.9 Natural Resources No effect on natural resources identified. II.10 Risk of Upset No risks forseen. II.11 Population Impacts: The proposal would add not more than 186 dwelling units to a property which is not currently residential in character. Except as a component of current growth being experienced by the City of Renton, proposal should have no role as a target or trigger for additional growth or relocation in the area. II.12 Housing Impacts: The proposal will add to the number of dwelling units available in the Renton area, potentially reducing housing pressure on other units in the area. II. 13 Transportation/Circulation Existing Conditions: Refer to Appendix B, Traffic Analysis, for thorough review of the existing traffic situation and impacts. No public transit currently operates on Lake Washington Boulevard. Mitigating Measures: The traffic study prepared for this proposal concludes no noticable increase in traffic volume on the surrounding streets as a result of the proposed development. Recommended measures are limited to regulating and easing flow in and out of the project with on-site roadway design. II.14 Public Services Existing Conditions: The site is within the jurisdictional area of the Renton Fire and Police Departments and within the Renton School District. The site contains a golf driving range available to the public and is adjacent to the newly expanded recreational facilities of Gene Coulon Park. 11 5 Impacts: The proposal would generate slight impacts on the Renton Fire and Police Departments. No special problems of significant demands are foreseen, nor would proposal effect current levels of service elsewhere in the community. The impact on school populations would depend upon the eventual population mix in the developed units, but would probably be limited. The proposal would add potential user population of park facilities in the Renton area. II.15 Energy Impacts: The proposal would increase demand on energy utilities for residential usage. II.16 Utilities Existing Conditions: Water and sewer facilities are available in the site area, although they present some access difficulties. No storm drainage system is presently developed in the area. Reserve capacity of the utilities is reported as sufficient for project needs by the Public Works Department. Impacts: No major problems are, therefore, expected in utility acquisition. II.17 Human Health No impacts foreseen. II.18 Aesthetics No degradation of aesthetics foreseen for proposed changes. II.19 Recreation Existing Conditions : Golf driving range currently occupies a major portion of the site. Impacts: Range would be eliminated. No other significant recreational impacts foreseen. II.20 Archeological/Historical No known archeological or historical resources occur on the site. 6 Transamerica Transamerica RECEIVED JUN 131984 Title Services Title Insurance Company 10635( 206 493rtheast Eighth Street Box r Bellevue,Washington 98009 I 206)451-7301 RE-ZONE CERTIFICATE Lincoln Properties Order No. 906073 11400 S .E . Sixth Bellevue , Washington ATTN: Scott Springer In the matter of the plat to be submitted to King County for approval , this Company has examined the records of the King County Auditors and Clerks offices , and the records of the Clerk of the United States District Court holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said King County, to-wit : as hereto attached - Page 5) VESTED IN: MARJORIE LOTTO and the HEIRS and DEVISEES of M.W. LOTTO , deceased, as to Tracts 357 and 358 ; See Note 1) AND PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, a national banking corporation, as to the remainder; EXCEPTIONS : A. General taxes , as follows , together with interest and penalty , if any, after delinquency : Tax Account No . Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance 334450-0305-00 1984 392 . 31 196 . 16 196 . 15 Covers Lot 340) 334450-0465-06 1984 497 . 19 248 . 60 248 . 59 Covers Lots 357 and 358 , EXCEPT Streets) 334450-0315-08 1984 1 , 949 . 92 974. 96 974. 96 Covers remainder of the property herein described) The above tax parcels comprise the total property described herein. The levy code for the property herein described is 2100 for 1984. continued - Page 2 Order No . 906073 1 . MEMORANDUM OF LEASE : LESSOR: Harold Phinney, whose wife is Ann Phinney LESSEE : Howard M. O'Farrell and Roberta D. O' Farrell , his wife DATED: July 30 , 1964 RECORDED : August 17 , 1964 RECORDING NO. : 5774917 Lessee ' s interest is now held of record by Roberta D. O'Farrell , Janet Ann Garner, Gregory S . O'Farrell and Nancy Roberta Johnston, as disclosed by King County Probate No. 219447 . Covers portion of property herein described and other property) 2 . NOTICE OF LEASE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF : LESSOR: Ann Phinney LESSEE:Bruce E. Larson, Pamela D.O . Larson , Sharon L. Larson, Richard C. Larson, Richard L. Larson, and Frances A. Larson FOR A TERM OF: 15 years FROM: November 1 , 1977 DATED: March 25 , 1978 RECORDED : May 11 , 1978 RECORDING NO. : 780511-0589 Covers property herein described and other property) 3 . ASSIGNMENT GIVEN AS SECURITY AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF : ASSIGNOR: Richard C. Larson and Sharon Larson; Bruce E. Larson and Pamela D.O. Larson; and Richard L. Larson and Frances A. Larson ASSIGNEE: Rainier National Bank AMOUNT:130,000.00 DATED: May 11 , 1978 RECORDED: October 20, 1980 RECORDING NO. : 801020-0242 A consent to said assignment was recorded under Recording No. 801020-0243 . Covers portion of property herein described and other property) continued - Page 3 Order No . 906073 4. Right , title and interest of Harold Phinney, now deceased, Probate No . 178567) , as disclosed by King County Probate No . 166503 (Regarding Eliza May Dixon, deceased) , and Memo of Lease recorded under Recording No . 5774917 . We note that said Probate Case No. 166503 passed interest on November 23 , 1962 in the property herein described to said Harold Phinney; however, said property was previously conveyed to the vestee herein by Deed recorded April 22 , 1954 under Recording No. 4438351 . 5 . Right, title and interest of Anna Phinney, as disclosed by King County Probate No . 178567 (Regarding Harold Phinney, deceased) , Memo of Lease recorded under Recording No. 5774917 , instrument recorded under Recording No. 780511-0589 , and Recording No. 801020-0243 . We note said property was previously conveyed to the vestee herein by deed recorded April 22 , 1954 under Recording No. 4438351 . 6 . UNRECORDED LEASE : LESSOR: Ann Phinney LESSEE :Renton Golf Range , a partnership DATED: July 10, 1964 DISCLOSED BY : Instrument recorded under Recording No . 771213-6109 7 . MATTERS SET FORTH BY SURVEY : DATED: July, 1981 RECORDED: April 6 , 1982 RECORDING NO. : 820406-9002 DISCLOSES : Conflicting boundary lines 8 . Pending action in King County Superior Court Cause No . 83-2-07374-0 , being an action for breach of contract and specific performance on lease dated July 10, 1964 . PLAINTIFF : R. C. Larson, et al DEFENDANT : Lincoln Property Co . NC Inc . ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF : Daniel W. Unti continued - Page 4 Order No . 906073 9 . UNRECORDED LEASE: LESSOR:. R. C . Larson, et al LESSEE :Lincoln Property Go . N. C. , Inc . DISCLOSED BY : Proceedings in King County Superior Court Cause No . 83-2-07374-0 10 . Documents reflected in the chain of title as shown herein as paragraphs 1 , 2 and 3 cover that portion, if any , of Government Lot 5 of Section 5 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.T . We find no record of said Government Lot 5 being established in said Section 5 . 11 . Questions of survey, rights persons in possession, material or labor liens , disposition of which will be determined by our inspection. A survey must be submitted which shows the location of all improvements , any encroachments , driveways and easements which encumber the property. NOTE 1 : Mike W. Lotto died March 20, 1981. Non-intervention will admitted March 20, 1984. In King County Probate Cause No . 81-4-01022-6 , Marjorie Lotto will be authorized, individually and as executrix upon filing of the inventory and entry of the order of solvency to sell and convey, or contract to sell and convey , said property, for an entire monetary consideration, subject to payment of inheritance tax. Attorney for the estate : Daniel Kellogg Records examined to June 5 , 1984 at 8 :00 A.M. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSU NCE COMPANY By 4g, it Icer 4 1-7320) FSH:ps Page 5 June 5 , 1984 Order No . 906073 DESCRIPTION: Tracts 340, 341, 343 , 357 and 358 , AND Vacated Tracts 342 and 359 , ALL in C . D . Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden No . 5 , as per plat recorded in Volume 11 of Plats , on page 83 , records of King County; TOGETHER WITH that portion of Lake View Blvd. (104th Ave . S.E . ) vacated by Order of the County Commissioners , which attached thereto by operation of law; EXCEPT that portion of Vacated Tracts 357 , 358 and 359 conveyed to King County for road by deeds recorded under Recording Nos . 1030490 , 1037001 and 1029408 respectively; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. C_'.r------ ' c P 5. '.1/. 1 www. j) 4• 1 i \L1 A.: 'II .. ,, , r____,, 1 Efr 1 '‘ BMW t!. 1 04. 2.A\ t..< 41 r / 342. 1( sir L-11 if 'Illkj- -, .t), iiik"1116Q,,,,,::::: 1. N114116. Of,' 4---1 - 1. iv iirlar i,, , e.., .....— 359 I I 358 4111 I e\L'itit,- Nxiiir 1174‘l''':11 ' it. '4 -....../ i I I L•., I , AP ... 'ILL.._ 011k ii. , -1'77 71 __Will V -II4 - --'qllgi L/NCOLN PROPERTY CO 400 SE 6In SI St•I•EEO 4 1•. .•;* ..... ' ''.'•• 't'•• ':••:- ••i:i4:47;:li;lialliiia•- . 7:77 _ ____.j_.'''• Jai:,- •g6..•Ad. 7 .."7:721.--.•L,. :..vfaca.1.--- 71 4: 3''''_.•'Allikl2 • .' Alkiliarat 1- .C.i6ht:• - • 8014•14. 0..4T an NIX. 116--- 87 1161.E11. ft• REZONE SITE PLAN 1217__•—=.-----_..___._____--- ...„,T_____ a. — .— aeon.IINCINE•Re.INC. lir-- Nj------ 11 9:_,,----/--)________,. _ 1 .208•1413%.AMEN..NCFPTHEAST 1 1 •t / . 1 t - 1 1 . 1 1 . t 1 • 1 *airy,ir,,,,,.. 1 • 1 1 . 1 -J. • ,'- ,., r 0 June 7, 1984 LETTER SUPPORTING REZONE The Owners of the property described in the accompanying documents hereby apply for a rezone of the property to an R-3 classification. The property is located east of Lake Washington Boulevard, across the street from the Gene Coulon Park extension. The site is currently in operation as a golf driving range on a lease basis. In the comprehensive plan the property has been designated as a R-4 for high density multi-family use. This classification would allow in excess of fifty units per acre on the site which contains approximately ten acres, thus permit- ting in the vicinity of 500 dwelling units at maximum site development. The owners are, however, applying for R-3 zoning with a stipulation that not more than 186 units will be constructed on the site. This R-3 application is being sought, in part, to expedite the environmental review and rezone process. Pre- vious discussions with the City of Renton Planning Department have indicated that an R-3 "contract" type rezone would likely fall below the threshold other- wise necessitating the preparation of an environmental impact statement occas- ioned by project size. The rezone to R-3 and subsequent development of multi-family housing on the pro- perty is appropriate. It is consistent with both the plans and policies of the City of Renton formulated in the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan forsees this pro- perty and adjacent sites along Lake Washington as developing into multi-family residential community. Such development is particularly important due to its close proximity to the central city core. Renton is experiencing overall rapid growth, much of which is in the outlying areas. Providing housing in or near the city core is recognized as an important priority for the near future, in Renton as well as many other cities. Interstate 405 provides the major traffic linkage of Renton to other parts of the Greater Seattle area. As designed currently and for the foreseeable future, access to the Interstate is substantially easier from the project area than it is for many areas east of I-405. The rapid growth of residential areas in east- ern Renton has created near saturation of major arterial feeders to the Interstate. Current and projected levels of traffic support the desirability of shifting additional growth to the west. The subject property is particularly well suited for development as a residential project of the type proposed. It is situated on a terrace, well above Lake Wash- ington, providing excellent views to the west while reducing its physical and visual impact on the lake and shoreline. The major portion of the site is nestled THE OVERLAKE BLDG. wncObn PROPERTY COmPanY n.c., mc. 11400 S.E.6th ST.,SUITE 220 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 206-455-4813 June 7, 1984 Page 2 below steep slopes screening the development from Interstate 405. These slopes provide excellent buffering between the proposed development and neighboring uses to the northeast and southeast. These slopes would, additionally, continue to act as a defacto addition to the greenbelt prevelant in the area. The proposed rezone and subsequent development is timely. As previously discussed, traffic patterns would suggest a preference toward con- centrating near term growth in areas of continued good access to downtown Renton and I-405. With the continued need for sensitivity in the area of energy con- servation, particularly regarding gasoline use, encouraging housing that is close to major employment, retail areas and recreation is an important priority. Lake- side suits this end particularly well . The site is directly across Lake Washington Boulevard from the newly completed Gene Coulon waterfront Park. This amenity will be particularly appealing to residents of multi-family developments who generally must sacrifice outdoor re- creational space in exchange for a close-in location. The rezoning and development of Lakeside is also timely because the City of Renton is currently experiencing vacancies of under 4%. And although the south Lake Washington area is a focal point of anticipated growth and development, no sub- stantial new development has yet occurred in the vicinity of the park. Neverthe- less, the demand for high quality yet affordable housing near the park has never been greater. Very truly yours, 914,7-=e1cLe Scott B. Springer SBS:gm Enc. Pp/1°Sb AN)AAL 5 J sup.00( J' THE LAKESIDE v' I a k' vot) l TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 1 e/'' ` Prepared for : Lincoln Property Company N.C. , Inc. 11400 S. E. 6th Street - Suite #220 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Prepared by: Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. 1126 108th Avenue N. E. , Bellevue, Washington 98004 December, 1981 THE LAKESIDE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DECEMBER 1981 Project Description The Lakeside is a proposed residential development consist- ing of a maximum of 186 multifamily units. A mix of one and two bedroom units will be constructed in two and three story build- ings. Recreational facilities such as a swimming pool and a club-house will also be provided for residents. Construction is expected to begin in the spring of 1982 and be completed in early 1983 . The occupancy of residence units is expected to be- gin in late 1982 and the development will be fully occupied in 1983. The Lakeside site is located on the east side of Lake Wash- ington Boulevard North, approximately 0. 6 miles north of North Park Drive in Renton. Most of the site is presently occupied by the Renton Golf Range. The street network shown on Figure 1 is the study area for this traffic analysis, except for Interstate Highway 405 and its interchanges, which are shown for reference only. The proposed vehicular access to the site will be via two driveways onto Lake Washington Boulevard, one near each end of the site. The driveways will intersect a loop roadway through the site which will also serve as the aisle between rows of per- pendicular parking stalls convenient to the buildings. Parking stalls will be provided at a ratio of 1 1/2 stalls per residence unit, with a minimum of 279 stalls provided, 186 of which will be covered. Also proposed as part of this project is the vaca- tion of portions of two existing unimproved street rights-of- way. These two rights-of-way are identified on the plat map as Lake View Boulevard, running approximately north/south through the site, and Third, running approximately east/west through the site. Existing Conditions Figure 1 illustrates the functional roadway classifica- tions, traffic control signal and stop sign locations, and perti- nent roadway characteristics of the existing street network. The functional roadway classifications shown in Figure 1 are those adopted by City of Renton Resolution #2345. Speed limits are posted for 35 MPH on Lake Washington Boulevard, and 30 MPH on Park Drive, while the remainder of the streets shown in Figure 1 have 25 MPH speed limits. The traffic signal at the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard North, Garden Avenue North, Park Avenue North, and North Park Drive presently operates in a four-phase fully- actuated mode, with one phase for each approach (with green arrows for left turns ) . Lake Washington Boulevard has three ap- proach lanes (left only, left or through, right only) , Garden Avenue has two approach lanes (left or through or right, right only) , the east leg has four approach lanes (left only, left or through, through only, right only) , and the west leg has three approach lanes ( left only, through only, through or right) . Lake Washington Boulevard North has one through lane in each direction, with a northbound left turn lane into the present entrance to Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park, and a southbound left turn lane into Houser Way. The Beach Park contains a well-used small boat launchig ramp. The Burlington Northern Railroad operates approximately two trains per day on the single-track railroad line located between Lake Washington Boulevard and the Lake. The railroad crossing of Lake Washington Boulevard immediately south of Houser Way is signalized. Figure 2 shows 1980 average daily traffic volumes in the vicinity of the Lakeside site. Figures 3 and 4 show existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the pertinent street inter- sections in the vicinity of the site. Truck traffic volumes within the study area are generally low. Several Metro Transit routes use North Park Drive and provide convenient bus service into the Renton Central Business District and beyond. Some bicy- clists use Lake Washington Boulevard as a commuter and recreational route. There is relatively little pedestrian traf- fic. Table 1 shows peak hour levels of service calculated for pertinent existing and proposed intersections along Lake Washing- ton Boulevard North. This street serves as a commuter route for workers from Boeing and other nearby industrial plants. Because of the proximity of these industrial plants and the distinct - - employee shift-change times, Lake Washington Boulevard experiences relatively high traffic volume peaking trends. Almost 20 percent of the daily traffic on Lake Washington Boulevard occurs during the PM peak hour. Because of the relatively high peak hour traffic volumes, and the long distances between gap-creating traffic control devices, vehicles turning onto Lake Washington Boulevard from side streets, such as Burnett Avenue North, experience some delays . However, during the off-peak times, traffic volumes on Lake Washington Boulevard are low and delays are minimal. City of Renton accident records indicate that the recent traffic accident history of the streets within the study area has not been unusually serious. Future Conditions Without the Lakeside Several arterial street improvement projects have been pro- posed within the vicinity of the Lakeside . The Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Extension project, currently under construction, will create a new driveway access into the park off of Lake Washington Boulevard, approximately one block south of the Lakeside site. This new park driveway will include two exit lanes and one entrance lane across the railroad tracks. The park extension project will also include the widening of Lake Washington Boulevard at this new driveway entrance, in order to provide a northbound left-turn lane. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT ) has recently reconstructed the I-405 freeway interchange at North 30th Street. The street overpass across the freeway has been widened and is now open to traffic. The Department of Transportation expects construction on the new overpass and free- way ramps to be completed by spring of 1982. The City of Renton Six Year Transportation Improvement Prog- ram (1981 to 1986 ) lists several proposed street improvement projects in the vicinity of the Lakeside site. One proposed project would improve Lake Washington Boulevard from North Park Drive to the north city limits, with drainage, paving, curbs, sidewalks, illumination, and channelization. Other proposed projects would improve Burnett Avenue North, North 30th Street, and Park Avenue North with similar types of roadway improvements. All of these projects have been assigned low priorities by the City of Renton and none of the projects are funded. Figure 5 shows projected 1983 Average Daily Traffic Volumes for the study area, without the Lakeside. These traffic volumes are based on the 1980 average daily traffic volumes plus 3 per- cent annual traffic growth, as recommended by the City of Renton. The traffic volumes shown in Figure 5 also include an estimated 1000 additional vehicle trips generated by the Beach Park Extension project on a summer weekday with sunny weather, based on information from the Beach Park Extension project Final EIS. Figures 6 and 7 show projected 1983 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes without the Lakeside. Table 1 shows 1983 peak hour levels of service calculated for the street intersections in the study area, without the Lake- side. Somewhat higher traffic volumes on Lake Washington Boule- vard due to the park extension and normal traffic during the peak periods growth will cause somewhat longer delays to side street traffic during the peak periods, such as at Burnett Avenue. However, traffic conditions will still be tolerable and probably will not be noticeably worse than the present conditions. Impacts of the Lakeside It is estimated that approximately 1135 vehicular trips would be generated by the Lakeside on an average weekday at full occupancy. A vehicular trip is defined as "A single or one- direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination exiting or entering ) inside the study site" (Trip Generation - An Informational Report, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Second Edition - 1979 ) . As shown in Figure 8, this estimate is based on 186 multifamily units and a rate of 6. 1 vehicular trips per unit per average weekday. Approximately 113 trips (10% of the total ) would occur during the AM peak hour, with about 80% of them leaving the site. Approximately 130 trips (11. 5% of the total ) would occur during the PM peak hour, with about 67% of them entering the site. Figure 8 shows the estimated distribution of the site- generated traffic onto the street network. Most of the site gen- erated traffic will be oriented south toward the industrial area and the Renton Central Business District. The most-used route will probably be I-405 via the interchange at N.E. Park Drive, while some site-generated traffic will also use the I-405 inter- changes at North 30th Street and at North 44th Street. Figure 9 shows projected 1983 average daily traffic volumes with the Lakeside fully occupied. Figures 10 and 11 show pro- jected 1983 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes with the Lake- side, for the pertinent street intersections within the study area. These peak hour traffic volume projections are conserv- atively high, because they assume that the peak generation hours for the site coincide with the on-street traffic peak hours. Because of the many industrial plant commuters, the on-street peak hours occur earlier than normal, perhaps actually before the Lakeside site traffic generation peak hours. Computed levels of service for these intersections, assuming the pro- jected traffic volumes, are shown in Table 1. The traffic generated by the Lakeside is not expected to cause any major traffic capacity problems. Though traffic vol- umes will increase somewhat, the signalized intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard, Garden Avenue, and Park Drive will con- tinue to operate at level of service D, with little change in traffic conditions noticeable to motorists. Vehicles turning on- to Lake Washington Boulevard during the peak hours will continue to experience delays, including those vehicles at Burnett Avenue and at the proposed site driveways. Because of the relativelylowvolumeswhichwillturnleftfromLakeWashingtonBoulevard into the site driveways, left turn lanes will not be necessary on the arterial at these locations. Extremely few left turns in- to the site will occur during the morning peak. Slightly more left turns will occur during the evening peak, but the PM southbound through traffic volumes delayed by left turning vehicles will be relatively low. The proposed vacation of portions of the two undeveloped rights-of-way identified on the plat map as Third and Lake View Boulevard will restrict access to some undeveloped lots immediat- ely south and east of the Lakeside site. After the proposed vacation, lots 344, 345 and 346 apparently would still have access via the undeveloped Lake View Boulevard and Morgan Avenue rights-of-way. However, this would be a circuitous route to Lake Washington Boulevard and may not be practical because of the terrain. Conclusions and Recommendations The traffic generated by the Lakeside is not expected to cause any major traffic problems. The slightly increased traf- fic volumes in the area probably will not be noticeable to motorists or residents. Increased volumes on Lake Washington Boulevard will somewhat increase the difficulty of turning onto this arterial during the peak hours, but conditions will still be tolerable. The delays expected for motorists waiting to turn from the site driveways onto Lake Washington Boulevard during the peak hours could be minimized by providing enough driveway width so that right and left turning vehicles would not impede each other. Driveway widths of about 35 feet (approximately 32 feet minimum) would allow a right turning vehicle and a left turning vehicle to wait side by side, with another lane for traffic en- tering the site. The driveways and adjacent landscaping should be designed to provide good motorist sight distances. The restriction of access to adjacent lots ( #344, 345, and 346 ) due to street vacations could possibly be mitigated with ac- cess agreements. These lots could be granted access to Lake Washington Boulevard via the Lakeside site circulation roadway. C FUNCTIONAL ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION, FREEWAY MAJOR ARTERIAL i SECONDARY ARTERIA L COLLECTOR ARTERIAL i l N LOCAL ACCESS m / APPROX. s.E 80TH ST.SCALE. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES O 0 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL W r I"=1600. F.). STCP SIGNS AT MAJOR C P INTERSECTIONS N. 40TH ST. NOTE: ALL LOCAL ACCESS 4.is(2) T STREETS STOP AT N 7ARTERIALS ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS N.36TH i I N R201APPROX. PAVEMENT WIDTH i z I 2) NO. OF LANES I W;P PAVED SHOULDERS IZ IGGRAVELSHOULDERSt I N J N NO. SHOULDERS i)N lI c CURBS IMAJ.30TH st.2L— — _ .4,, 24(2)2P IT1 6. k E. 27TH sT — 3O. aJ ki 2 THEv LAKESIDE" SITE V, It v. 1y GENE COULON MEMJRIAL k`DR pR BEACH PARK c,leD 9 y 40(2)C BOEING r\' n i 82'(7)6'P J EXISTING STREET NETWORK 6IGURE THE LAKESIDE" TRAFFIC ANALYSIS IR 1 J i I SOURCE: ACITYOFRENTON1980 TRAFFIC FLOW MAP Q N02 A PPROX. S.E.80TH ST. SCALErifpI"=1600'k r n 0 N. 40TH ST. v N.36111 ST,. O I z 1O c0 I !z. N N g N.30TH ST. E--i- f—)- 01780 5310 N E. 27TH ST s 0 12-M I.(J THE 1 SITELAKESIDEiiii., 1. ic 20,930 13/ 3 C 0 a S/ Z c0 1 GENE COULON 46MEMORIAL F PARIS,..1'1" NBEtOPARK0. y 01 0 BOEING ti t4-7), 1980 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES (ADT) 6IGUR THE LAKESIDE" TRAFFIC ANALYSIS lidt 2 O r 0 tN. 36THST. Mo 0 130 w SCALE NOT o1. - L-cv - _5 I . 23 N.30TH ST t3 — ' Oc0 _ 3 Oco f1F- k o1st DR. P 26 I r\$ 24) 4y Q \ \ 1981 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (6 : 45 - 7 : 45 AM) 61G U RE THE LAKESIDE" T FTRAFFIC ANALYSIS m r3a N. 36TH ST. t I.'A1/: N NOT TO SCALE 1I 7 f(DAl T jir— S7N.30TH w 4 — T t r 0----si —al, O co F 6 O E E i .„, \k SOURCES :', MANUAL COUNTS BY THE CITY OF RENTON e T.P. & E. 111 a Orn DR.T ., 1 GS /'k. PPa- F9 1A' 67~/Fj\ 4 r 9 '0 \..,,_ At..< c 2 1981 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES (3 : 45 - 4 : 45 PM) FIGURE 14 4 THE LAKESIDE" TRAFFIC ANALYSIS m-gitt N A PPROX. r S.E.80TH ST. SCALE 0 I=1600l X P' IN. 40TH ST. I i J k.36TH In. ill( 4(::( Y I§c N N.BOTH ST. 2110 5970 k. N.E2?TH ST 1\ 4k\fC g 44 THEvLAKESIDE" ipii . SITE It 23,200 i• z 15 m 00 0 z3il GENE COULON itMEMORIAL 111/4 N pR BEACH PARKf. f PAR/ A BOEING m o% r PROJECTED 1983 ADT 'S WITHOUT "THE LAKESIDE"IGURE flE 5 THE LAKESIDE" TRAFFIC ANALYSIS r k,, c° ",_____71 rN.. 36TH ST. i inr-oonN NOT TO 0 "°° > SCALE a a 9 — 1 N t: L g I ) 4' Ira pr 24 N.3OTH L---J ST uw 3 _A.. --it r-- moca J tp ci A 1°\, ,,, \ k LA 0, O tT to a, DR. AS QP0.lis; A a. R 1 cq1/ PROJECTED 1983 AM PEAK HR. TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT FIG U B THE LAKESIDE" THE LAKESIDE" TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 6 42*Pr 4 N. 36TH ST. ri O O /Il NOT TO 1\ ''•L0 >SCALE a ti N N R_7 2 8 y 43 N.30TH 1-- ST w 4 —IP ...) tr a 2 Fr)mrnJ 0? A) o s i 0 I,-,---,, , DR ....._ t 0". AP s I pt. 44Y ti b Il PROJECTED. 1983 PM PEAK HR. TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT FIGURE THE LAKESIDE" IIR 7 THE LAKESIDE" TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ESTIMATED LAKESIDE APARTMENTSliTRIPGENERATIONtr APPROX. 186 UNITS (MAX. ) X q- nJ 6. 1 VEHICLE TRIPS/UNIT* 4bAPPROX. APPROX. 1135 TRIPS/AVERAGE S E BOTH ST. SCALE WEEKDAY r 11 i"=I600' 0. 0 SOURCE: Q I N. 40TH ST. TRIP GENERATION-AN Z INFORMATIONAL REPORT JP I.T.E. , 2ND EDITION, 1979 .i N 36TH $T h K , d N.BOTH ST Al115 ( IO%) i 4L-------________l') N.E. 27TH S7 1 N%c)1 Qtu J THE v LAKESIDE" SITE 1135 (I 00%) m i 510 (45%) Zip IS a rn°° _ •0 • GENE COULON itMEMORIAL ke: PAR BEACH PARK 0 BOEING M2f u° t N w1: ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC FIGU RE THE LAKESIDE" TRAFFIC ANALYSIS IR 8 ct. A r_ _ m Ira A PPROX. r` SEJTHST. I"= 1600' Q N. 40TH ST. N Y TM STD, 4/)/( 4:1 Y — 1(:):( 0 N 30 ST. 25 6085 c N F. ti\tN. 2T2H NE 27TFi ST a' vc, Ns\ THE 4 ,,1LAKESIDE" SITE r1• CO 2 3,710 N-1- 7 GO 07 GENE COLON it AMEMORIAL IVF PAR ----- BEACH PARK s o BOEING 0,r Imq PROJECTED 1983 ADT 'S WITH "THE LAKESIDE" 61GUR THE LAKESIDE" TRAFFIC ANALYSIS J 1 3 fccs 1 p--0 N. 36TH ST. At 4: o N NOT TO w SCALEmya a ~5 4 N Jfl, i -26 N.30TH L-- / ST W 3 —i r r 4 1 -4 os2cv o L F- 40 WO --11a THEtLAKE- w " SIDE„ pp N.-_16 pc- 38 r DR. N E, Ntklir qY p'1 3 c37 ID 2 1 PROJECTED 1983 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH FIGURE THE LAKESIDE" 1 ? 1 0 THE LAKESIDE" TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Pr es ec, Az(42c.`'i fr N, 36THST. A r M- N moo. , / NOT TO k,.tio > SCALE O - NN L_ 7 N ) 1t.pr---52 N.30TH ST u, 0 —. t r 112 — . in rn, CfOI H ilz 0 2 .„ 4014•12 r"THE o SIDEE' Fsi 4°' 1L—8 L 18 tr 5-4 DR 01 I bey P AZ 24) lir4Y I C6 c 0 2 J I PROJECTED 1983 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH FIGUR THE LAKESIDE" 1R •1 1 THE LAKESIDE" TRAFFIC ANALYSIS I TABLE 1 Street Intersection Levels of Service During Street Traffic Peak Hours 1981 1983 1983 Intersection Without With All on Lake Existing The Lakeside The Lakeside Washington Blvd. N. ) AM PM AM PM AM PM Burnett Ave. N. * C to D D D D To E D E south intersection ) north site, driveway**A/A/C C/B/E south site driveway**A/A/D C/B/E N.E. Park Drive and Garden Drive D D D D D D Signalized) Level of service for left turn from Burnett only. Individual levels of service shown for right turns from driveway (assumed STOP sign )/ left turns from Lake Washington Boulevard/ left turns from driveway (assumed STOP sign ) . 1 Description of Levels of Service: Primary Reference: A Little or no delay Interim Materials on Highway Capacity B Short traffic delays Transportation Research Circular No. 212, C Average traffic delays Transportation Research Board, D Long traffic delays January 1980, p. 37. E Very long traffic delays ; congestion OO1.OS ENGINEE. yS, INC. 1 CIVIL ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS December 7, 1981 DEI PROJECT NO. 80010 Lincoln Property Company 11400 S.E. Sixth Street Suite 220 Bellevue, WA 98004 Attention: Scott Springer Ref: Lakeside Apartment Project, Renton Dear Mr. Springer: At yourrequest we have researched the availability of utilities (water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer) to the referenced site. A complete discussion of the alternatives available to provide the site with ade- quate fire flows is contained in the report. of 20 April 1981 by RH2 Engineering. In essence, the report states that the city' s system can be upgraded and extended to the site through one of several routes and by one of two different funding mechanisms. Sufficient water supply is therefore available to the site. Sanitary sewers are also available to the site by one of two alternatives. An existing 8" line deadends at the northwest corner of the property on the east margin of Lake Washington Blvd. The depth of the line limits the potential service area to the south. Those portions which cannot be served by the existing 8" line can be served by a tap into the METRO trunk which ties on the west side of the Lake Washington Blvd. There are now several storm sewer culverts under Lake Washington Blvd. which drain the site and adjoining lands. Studies done for the park show these structures to be more than adequate to carry the anticipated developed flows. Whether these culverts will qualify as "adequate downstream courses" so as to eliminate the need for retention on the developed sites will depend to a certain extent on the development plans, but the possibility is certainly there. In conclusion, there would seem to be no insurmountable problem with providing utilities to this site. Some extension and upgrading of existing facilities will be necessary, but this is neither unusual , nor are the improvements required so extensive that they could not be funded and installed by the developer. Very/truly yours, r Bruce J. Dodd- P. BJD/jk 1850-130TH AVE.N.E..BELLEVUE.WA 88005 • 12O6)885-7877 OR 454-3743 171- • • L April 20, 1981 S106.1 .0 RECEIVED APR 231981 LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. , INC. 515 116th Avenue N.E. , Suite 158 DODDS ENGINEER'' I'` Bellevue, NA 98004 JOB NO. 8»1U Attention: Mr. Scott Springer, J.D. Subject:. Eater system improvement alternatives for the proposed Lakeside development Dear Mr. Springer: • This letter summarizes water system improvement alternatives for providing various levels of water supply capability for fighting a fire (fire flow) at the proposed Lakeside development in the City of Renton. Fire flow levels of 2700, 3500 and 4200 gallons per minute (gpm) while maintaining 20 pounds per square inch pressure residual, in accordance with Insurance Services Office Criteria, have been considered at the highest development elevation of 100 feet. The attached map illustrates four alternatives for obtaining the fire flow levels mentioned. Alternative 1 and 2 each contain approximately 1 ,900 lineal feet of pipe and will require a pressure reducing station. These two alternatives can provide fire flows of 3500 or 4200 gpm by providing 12 or 16 inch diameter pipe. Alternative 3, a substantially longer length at 3700 feet, consists of two sections of pipeline improvements and can provide a maximum of 3500 gpm. Alternative 4, which can provide 2700 gpm, consists of modifying the pipeline improvements plannned by the City Park Dept. for Gene Conlon Park. The alignment would be adjusted up to Lake Washington Boulevard instead of through the park and the diameter increased to 12 inches from 8 inches. This alternative, although more expensive than Alternatives 1 and 2, could obtain participation by other property owners and the City and we anticipate that the participation would make this the least expensive alternative. Tne estimated cost for each alternative is summarized in the following table: 300 - 120th Avenue N.E. Suite 219. Bellevue. Wa. 95005 (206) 451-0535 e., Lincoln Property tors y N.C. , Inc. April 20, 1981 Page 2 Current Alternative Estimated Cost l or 2 3500 gpm 1900 lineal feet of 12" diameter pipe and a pressure reducing station 80,600 lA or 2A 4200 gpm Same as 1 and 2 except 16" diameter pipe 95,800 3 3500 gpm 3720 lineal feet of 12" diameter pipe and a pressure reducing station 132,400 4 2700 gpm Realignment and size increase to 12" ' (Cost dependent pipe for 4250 lineal feet and one upon partici— crossing pation) Our recommendation is Alternative 2 or 2A depending on the actual fire flow required. If the fire flow requirement can be reduced to 2700 gpm, then Alternative 4 should be considered in more detail prior to making a deci— sion. (Degree of others ' participation should be established). Please contact me at your earliest convenience if you desire additional information. Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance in your planning efforts. Sincerely, Xe;': Richard H. Harbert, ' P.E. RHH:jw cc Bruce Dodds, Dodds Engineers RECEIVED APR 231981 DODDS ENGINEERS, INC. JOB NO. i i 1 I 04.•) a 5 I. 1 i ."! 30..!• 5 ik..: ririin. r. CFI FLII 1. 1, 111:, 11: E1, 1, 11, 11: 11N 5 5 I. 7.: 7.. o.. ' '=:. - 7 7 i12. id..' 4. 14rd. 11 ILI I 1_ 11 LI I 1111_ LLII 1111. _. . 40 41 4 2 a --- r- . - - • - 2. 9 it S i. X i 11111 l'. 1'., 1. 1.[ IIII I Fl 1- 1 Erri FILI I 1_ 11,: ri ELD• 1114TAItY ''' r c."---- I r. r. i.; ri iiiiiiiiiTti i ili rirtil Hi_ l 4 5 4 4 45 II : SCHOOL 4•!!..-- - -- _ --. pc , . 4i_ li\ I" I I ITTITITliU 1 rim 11111W v 7 II 9 1 s• I a. . ill. I[ 1 • Ir..- e 1. ti: Ell F- tr; -: 24I . Am....... m.. t. i.... 41 4il . 51 t 52 • I t• t r 79 1- 111 I. c' 2 7 8 5 • I 4:A. . !.. 1. 1 2. s I- 1-• J.:::.‘ 1:....!"•:•:• 1 a 74 FL 1L.. 1\ i....• ' s* .- 4.. A".••:•;.„ ----- r e!.. is;-:,- LA n I - • I IA 40 B A 2'pa c Of I d s 1 v D • •• ,- . 9 1 A c UM 1 31 II 1.• El _Z. 95 20Z. 274 I 4 S3 1. v. 1 1 \\\ I(\ .,..,::„ 4 0 137 ;.... i.:. j..... . 33 3 ...... 2sc;_, I fri ,\\\„\ 33. . ... ... S. Z34 i-, Id i...,,...,-,-,,,. 4.. I — t ,,,, 3:•.• I .,, IS 4 Z94- 203 233. . 2. Q.2. 2_ 1 1, I P:Ili/,,'-• --!..'',.' P.... ea A cV-.. . 2 At! i% \ ' ifitr7IF, 4':: : dijir,‘ '‘- ' 1_ 1 4: 4:: z. i- f.- 1%.-',. 7- 44..:: 7 ,.. 1:-. 7 .,•;.: s,,: f.,! 2%. 7...-: ''''',-... Z.:::::`;.: -. 9 • 1 1- 1 c. 1 ‘ ' i- r- 1...:!..,, Ar. wr ,, t;;:. Lt, 374 ., 4---.." 7 -- 21 i • -, ,.- 7,i; " ..°-. 7- 4' 4' 7.. 4): 4',yit. : 344 L I- J - • I... \ 3. 5: 1• l' ii I-!— . .... 1.•:.. !./.. - --. , ' 1 I..... . ••••-•. I '' !,.:,. r__ ...:-". Z9Z 285 7/ 1.... ...-.......? i--. • 345 i, 1:. i. . 357 .- - 0 331. 31‘ n : 7 .:: •:'-: i'•::: t ...: 1 - .. i ... i 9 t 2._ ---. 1 1 -. 7.i-.2..::‘ . 355 > i 1 • 11 I Ff.:: i 347 V) 1. . 2. 91 2 8 62 ti- 1.. 1) 1 ! t-9 i t. f.....:::.. i, : 11. - . — 20 74 f 11. • a :tif0 2 1 \ y.. \ \\\,„.., .,.. I 2.--•:-:- -.: .-... : F:= 1; 6 §..!!! 0 e. i• \‘';'. In\ 6 --—..- - I : 4 - 2 .;• ..' •-: - I 0!-.) - ; r. 2) 1 1 ____ z 11..... 1 1 . 4. 111" 11. 1 1: 1: 4 \\ 51::; L__ I- .., i I -- • .:_ z ,:. .... .- --- • j , I ,:. l i : ts -.• J ' 7 I il ji 7 Pr. 9 ii . I 1 ii) ..,.. I I/ L f.-. I( E- WI\ SI- 4. ...; 11\--" A \ \.. i I ! Ca!_ Zl, 7 1 1... i B C- A C H v I I PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED APARTMENT COMPLEX LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD NORTH RENTON, WASHINGTON E-1625 FOR LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY Cf i :-,;- al con a,.p ..A -. :. .. .. j d Geotechnical Engineering and Geology Ear x. 1 r COflSU a i Inc. k 1 Geotechnical Engineering and Geology 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 101, Bellevue, Washington 98005 Phone: (206) 643-3780 / Seattle (206) 464-1584 August 24 , 1981 E-1625 Mr. Dean Henry Lincoln Property Company The Overlake Building 11400 S. E. 6th Street, Suite 220 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Apartment Complex Lake Washington Boulevard North Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Henry: In accordance with your request and within the scope of our proposal dated July 29, 1981 this report presents the results of our Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study for the subject project. The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface soil condi- tions in order to provide preliminary recommendations for site prepar- ation, foundation and retaining wall design. The scope of our study included test pits, laboratory tests, geotechnical engineering analyses and the preparation of this report. Our preliminary study indicates that the site is underlain by medium dense native soils at relatively shallow depths. In the relatively level western portion of the site, the native soils are overlain by medium dense granular fills ranging in depth from about three ( 3) to eight ( 8) feet. In the southeastern section of the site including the locations of Buildings A, B, C and P ( see Plate 1) , up to fourteen (14 ) feet of fill was encountered. The proposed struc- tures may generally be supported on conventional spread footings bear— ing on the existing granular fills, firm native soils, or on structur- al fill. In the southeastern area of the site where the depth of fill approached fourteen (14 ) feet, we recommend additional explora- tion once plans are finalized. For planning purposes, it may be assumed that building areas in this portion of the site will need to be overexcavated to a depth of about four (4 ) feet and replaced by structural fill. The following sections describe the study and explain our recom- mendations in greater detail. PROJECT DESCRIPTION At the time our study was performed, the site and proposed build- ing locations were as shown schematically on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 1. This is based on an undated preliminary Site Plan byGoes, Guthrie & Associates. Lincoln Property Company E-1625 August 24, 1981 Page 2 It is planned to construct a multi-unit apartment complex on the site. At the time of our study, the project was in the planning stage. Seventeen (17) apartment buildings are tentatively planned. The buildings will be two to three story conventional wood-frame structures with relatively light foundation loads. Typical loads for this type of construction are on the order of 2000 pounds per lineal foot for perimeter walls, and column loads of 25 kips, dead plus live loads. Cuts and fills will be dependent on final grades which had not been developed at the time of our study. Buildings planned along the eastern margin against the hill may require cuts and retaining walls from about five ( 5) to ten (10 ) feet in height. The above design criteria are preliminary. Once final plans become available we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, it is recommended that Earth Consultants, Inc. be provided the opportunity for a general review of final design. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Our field exploration was performed on August 12, 1.981. The sub- surface conditions were explored by excavating twelve test pits to a maximum depth of fifteen (15) feet below the existing surface at the approximate locations shown on Plate 1. The locations of the test pits were approximately determined by pacing from estimated property corners. Elevations of test pits were approximately determined by interpolation between plan contours. Hence, the locations and elevations of the test pits should be consi- dered approximate only. The field exploration was continuously monitored by a field engi- neer from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative bulk soil samples, mea- sured in-situ strengths and observed pertinent site features. Shear strengths of undisturbed soils were measured where practical in the field with a penetrometer. These results are recorded on the test pit logs at the appropriate depth. Soils were classified visually in the field according to the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on Plate 2, Legend. Logs of the individual test pits are presented on Plates 3 through 9, Test Pit Logs. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. Representative soil samples from the test pits were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examina- tion and testing. Visual classifications were supplemented by index tests such as sieve and hydrometer analyses on representative sam- ples. Field moisture determinations were performed on each bulk sam- ple. Results of moisture determinations together with classifica- tions, are shown on the test pit logs included in this report. The Earth Consultants, Inc. I_ Lincoln Property Company E-1625 August 24, 1981 Page 3 results of the sieve and hydrometer analyses are illustrated on Plates 10 and 11. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The site is located at and around the existing Renton Golf Range on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard in the 2000 block. The site covers an area of about eight (8 ) acres with a trailer court to the north and undeveloped land to the east and south. The golf range occupies the central portion of the site. The site has been used as a fill area for a quarry operation which previously existed on the site. Steep bluffs from the quarry operation still exist in the northeastern site margin and southeast of the southern site margin. The site generally slopes to the west. In the extreme eastern portion slopes are as steep as 0. 5:1 (Horizon- tal :Vertical) , with the relief for the eastern quarter of the site on the order of seventy ( 70 ) feet. The western three-quarters of the site is nearly level with a relief of approximately thirty ( 30 ) feet. A trailer and a number of structures with utilities associated with the golf driving range are present in the west central area. Recent fills have been deposited south of the golf range. No flowing water was observed at the time of our field explo- ration. A small pond of still water is located east of the southern site margin in a low area. Subsurface Subsurface conditions in the central and northern areas of the site occupied by the golf range are fairly uniform. These areas are immediately underlain by medium dense miscellaneous granular fills ranging in depth from about one (1) foot to nine (9) feet as observed in Test Pits TP-1 through TP-6. Beneath the fills are native soils. The native soils are medium dense to dense slightly silty sand and gravelly silty sand. In Test Pit TP-4 , the top four (4 ) feet of the native soil is a very dense slightly sandy silt. The southwestern portion of the site is immediately south of the golf range and parallel to Lake Washington, is underlain by native soils to the depth explored. The soils are a medium dense sand with varying amounts of silt and gravel. In the southeastern site area south of the golf range the quarry operation evidently continued deeper. Test Pits TP-9 and TP-12 en- countered miscellaneous fills ranging in depth from about eight and one-half ( 8-1/2) to fourteen ( 14 ) feet, respectively. The fill is a Earth Consultants, Inc. Lincoln Property Company E-1625 August 24, 1981 Page 4 medium dense gravelly silty sand containing some debris. Portions of the fill in Test Pit TP-12 contained large amounts of debris includ- ing organics, with moderate groundwater seepage in the last one foot of the fill. Beneath the miscellaneous fills are medium dense silty gravelly sand in Test Pit TP-9 and medium dense slightly silty sand in Test Pit TP-12. In the northeastern and east central area, the site extends into the hill. Test Pits TP-7 and TP-8 excavated in this area encountered medium dense silty gravelly sand and hard slightly sandy silt. In the bluff along the northern site margin the silty gravelly sand and hard silt can be observed with approximately ten (10 ) feet of glacial till as a cap. Moderate groundwater seepage was observed in Test Pits TP-7 and TP-12. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on our preliminary field exploration, laboratory testing and engineering analyses, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed construction. The proposed structures may be sup- ported on conventional spread footings bearing on the existing granu- lar fills, firm native soils, or on structural fill. The fills exist- ing over most of the site are generally sufficiently compact to sup- port the planned building loads without reworking. However, some recompaction of these fills may be required in localized areas. In the southeastern portion of the site, including the possible loca- tions of Buildings A, B, C and P, the existing fills are deeper and contain significant amounts of debris. At these locations, it will most likely be necessary to overexcavate about four (4 ) to five ( 5) feet of the existing fills and replace them by structural fill. We recommend that additional exploration be conducted in this area once building and grading plans have been finalized. The southeastern area where the fill is deeper, should receive additional investiga- tion as building plans are finalized. The following sections of this report present more detailed recommendations for various geotechnical engineering aspects of the project which should be incorporated into the project design and construction. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices for the exclusive use of the Lincoln Property Company and their representatives. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Earth Consultants, Inc. Lincoln Property Company E-1625 August 24, 1981 Page 5 Foundations Based on the design parameters outlined in the Project Descrip- tion section of this report, it is our opinion the proposed struc- tures may be supported on continuous and individual spread footings bearing on the existing granular fills, firm native soils or struc- tural fill placed in accordance with the Site Preparation section of this report. For Buildings A, B, C and P, foundations may be support- ed on a structural fill mat extending to a depth of three ( 3) feet below the footing bottoms, placed after removing the existing fills. Structural fill should extend a distance beyond footing perimeters equal to the depth of fill placed. Perimeter footings should extend to a minimum depth of eighteen 18) inches below the lowest adjacent final grade and may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of two thousand (2000 ) pounds per square foot (psf) , for dead plus live loads. Continuous footings should have a minimum width of sixteen (16) inches. Isolated spread footings may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of two thousand ( 2000 ) psf, but should have a minimum width of eighteen 18) inches. A one-third increase in allowable bearing pressures is permissible when considering lateral loads due to wind and earth- quakes. Because of possible variations in the existing fill on the site it is recommended that all foundation excavations be thoroughly tamp- ed to detect any possible areas of loose soils. Loose soils, if present, should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill or crushed rock. We recommend that all footing excavations be examined by a repre- sentative from Earth Consultants, Inc. to observe compliance with the design concepts presented in this report. Floor Slabs Floor slabs may be supported on the recompacted existing fills or firm native soils,or on structural fill placed in accordance with the Site Preparation section of this report. The top four (4 ) inches should be a free draining sand or gravel to act as a capillary break. This requirement may be waived if the fill is free draining or moisture infiltration will not be a problem. In areas where moisture is undesirable a vapor barrier may be placed beneath the slab. One (1) to two ( 2) inches of sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction. The slab may be isolated from foundations to reduce the detrimental effects of differential settlements between the footings and floor slab. Earth Consultants, Inc. Lincoln Property Company E-1625 August 24, 1981 Page 6 Settlements For the anticipated building loads, we expect that total settle- ments on the order of one-half ( 1/2) to one (1) inch will occur, with about half this amount occurring as differential settlements between spread and continuous footings, and between slabs and foundations. It is expected that this settlement should occur during construction with the remaining portion during the initial loading of the slab. Lateral Forces Short term wind or seismic forces may be resisted by passive pressures, and/or friction between concrete and the supporting sub- grade. The passive resistance may be considered as an equivalent fluid load of two hundred fifty ( 250) pounds per cubic foot (pcf) . This value assumes that all footing backfill is compacted in accor- dance with the Site Preparation recommendations in this report. A coefficient of friction of three tenths ( 0. 30 ) may be considered between concrete and soil. Basement and Retaining Walls Basement and retaining walls should be designed to resist late- ral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these struc- tures. Walls that are free to rotate one-thousandth of their height at the top should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures im- posed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of thirty-five ( 35) pcf. If walls are restrained from free movement at the top, they should be designed for an additional uniform pressure of one hundred 100) psf. The above pressures assume a maximum wall height of ten (10) feet and that no surcharge slopes or loads will occur above the walls. If deviations from these criteria are expected, we should be contacted for the appropriate design parameters. All walls should be provided with adequate provisions for subsur- face drainage. Slopes Varying heights of cuts will be required along the eastern site margin depending on final building locations. We recommend all temporary slopes be cut at 3 :2 (Horizontal :Ver- tical) . Permanent slopes should be sloped at 2 :1. We recommend that all excavated slopes be examined by a representative of Earth Consul- tants, Inc. to evaluate the stability of the exposed soils. The existing slopes appear generally stable and should not be disturbed. However, all permanent exposed slopes should be vegetated to reduce erosion. Earth Consultants, Inc. Lincoln Property Company E-1625 August 24, 1981 Page 7 Moderate groundwater seepage was encountered at depth in only two test pits which were excavated during a relatively dry period. Although we encountered only minimal groundwater, groundwater seepage may be expected from cuts during rainy periods. If present, ground- water should be controlled as outlined in the following section. Groundwater Control The subject site contains fine grained soils that will make grad- ing operations difficult during wet weather. For this reason, it is important that groundwater be controlled wherever possible. Seepage should be anticipated from cuts during rainy weather. Surface inter- ceptor ditches may have to be placed along the top of all cuts. Sub- surface drains may have to be placed either along the toe or top of all cuts, whichever location appears to be more feasible. We suggest that appropriate locations of drains be established during grading operations by a representative of Earth Consultants, Inc. , at which time the seepage areas, which if present, will be more clearly defined. The site should be graded to drain at all times and all loose surfaces sealed at night to prevent the infiltration of rain into the soils. After a rainfall, equipment should remain off the soils until they have had a chance to dry sufficiently. Site Preparation All building and pavement areas should be cleared of all struc- tures, utility lines, pavements and debris, large vegetation, brush and other deleterious matter. In all areas that will receive build- ings or pavements, the subgrade should be proofrolled under the obser- vation of a representative of Earth Consultants, Inc. This procedure should indicate the presence of any exceptionally loose or unstable areas which, if present, should be overexcavated and replaced by structural fill or crushed rock. All structural fill should be placed in eight (8) to ten (10 ) inch thick loose lifts and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent rela- tive compaction as determined by ASTM D-1557-70 (Modified Proctor) . The near surface site soils contain an excessive amount of fines which when wet may be difficult to compact. We therefore do not rec- ommend their use during wet weather. If any of the grading is to be conducted during wet weather, we recommend that granular materials with a maximum size of three ( 3) inches, containing less than 5 per- cent fines, be used for structural fill. During dry weather, other granular materials may be used provided they can be properly com- pacted. Imported fill samples should be submitted to Earth Consul- tants, Inc. prior to bringing on the site. The placement of the structural fill should be observed and tested by Earth Consultants, Inc. Earth Consultants, Inc. Lincoln Property Company E-1625 August 24 , 1981 Page 8 Pavement Areas Pavement areas may be supported on the recompacted subgrade or on structural fill placed in accordance with the Site Preparation section of this report. The upper six ( 6) inches of pavement sub- grade should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum den- sity. Below this level a compactive effort of 90 percent would be adequate. The pavement section for lightly loaded traffic or parking areas should consist of two (2) inches of Asphalt Surfacing over four 4 ) inches of Crushed Rock Base or three ( 3) inches of Asphalt Treated Base (ATB) . Heavier loaded traffic areas will require thicker sections. Additional Services Because of the preliminary nature of this investigation, it is recommended that Earth Consultants, Inc. be provided the opportunity for a general review of the final design and specifications in order that earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly inter- preted and implemented in the design and construction. It is also recommended than when final design is available, that additional field work be performed to delineate the extent of the fill and it' s condition in the south eastern area and develop specific recommenda- tions for building in this area. The analyses and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon preliminary the data obtained from the test pits. The nature and extent of variations between test pits may not become evi- dent until construction. If variations then appear evident, Earth Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to reevaluate the recommendations of this report prior to proceeding with the construction. It is also recommended that Earth Consultants, Inc. be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or rec- ommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of con- struction. The following plates are included and complete this report: Plate 1 Test Pit Location Plan Plate 2 Legend Plates 3 through 9 Test Pit Logs Plates 10 and 11 Grain Size Analyses Earth Consultants, Inc. Lincoln Property Company E-1625 August 24, 1981 Page 9 We trust the information presented herein is adequate for your requirements. If you need additional information or clarification, please call. IRespectfully submitted, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. O Z li. x 0 *; ,$$ ... 4/ + i 2---z_2:-. ; ZFS C,ST P ‘C.i it Anil Butail, P. E. S/ONAL ',ti° i Chief Engineer JRD/AB/jb Earth Consultants, Inc. R t. JET t70 1\VY ie Property / sill LineOy7Ero:. 6iiLuke ApprptimoteScnk aTP-7nTP-4 IYoaoeoIron. I ( N145 N i OI1 TP-3K.w sTP6VICINITYLEGEND O68TP-3ApproximateTestPit Location OPossibleBuildng 0PrteertySite ONTP-II0Line 18TP-2TP-l2 Z........ 65TP-5 OReferenceI PreliminarySitePlan 7 TP"IByGoes, GuthrieaAssociates, Inc. undated TP9 TP-100111Earth ConsultantsInc. n -- n -- GEO,ELNNICAIENGINIEniNG6GUAOGy Z .-. LAKEWASHINGTONBLVD. N. TestPitLocationPlan ApartmentSite Renton, Vbshington Pro, No. 1625 (DateAug. 481 'Piste1 ` 1LCHLLIJ jotS MAJOR DIVI IS GRAPH LETTER T AL DESCRIPTIONS , SYMBOL SYMBOL a • •moo••• o s e .6 rLlM( • •Ot0 ••AYELS, {R•VEL•SANS RAvtl v a GW ITVR(t, UT TLC OA NO FINES ImoCWT. MAY(LS 0 D•'o r O R•rtlll ( Infs. •• meII...) • : K 'i S. .•. • K RAKLJPOOT-{R•OtO { , Tau GP •••R WITuw(f, UT TLt ON NO P,R[s s1AIR(D r fII 1:1Tau GM saLTY {RAv(LS.SARD- Now TNAA so%T 11 Tj ILT rlcrullu CI CO•Rst /RAC- GAv(US WITH TINES TIO• me TAIN[D (••••wrM. ••••••• •1 ON NO.• SKve h••AI CLATET mum.", W1•vtL•sAMO- GC CLAY rl1TUR[f fry• : ••r NTL {tLL-$RAOED {AORAV(LLT SW SA $, UTTLE OA NO FINES NO CLEAN SAND • ••• O 11,11. ., •• 11.•.1 A,f.----- SOIL! e•.••:•.• ORLTp -M LAO[S .O C, {RAv[l LT NON( THAN SO% SP SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES 0/ NAT(RIAL Is L AR•tR T Writ NO- 1 r•. :11• 200 (it SITS ro.c THAN sou SM TILTY lANai, SAND-SILT WIATURE7 7•NOS MTN FINS OF cOARS[ RAC- te.•.• ' , TION PAS 71N• ( sow••.•••• a / 0 1b•.) NO. • sKrE Sc ...A.., sAAIr[T Of, ......_._•, no-cl•r :Ttwtf I waw/C SILTS *.Na v(RT Fill ML fAAOE, ROC[ PLOui, SILTY OR CLATtY ring SANDS ON CLAYEY IITf r1TM }uplT LJ.siiciT IN 4rORC CLAYS Of LOU TO r(Diur FINS SILT! PLASTICITY. M•v CLAYS, R•I NCI ND Lows um? r CLS s•ANDY CLAYS, LTY CLAM, LEAN 71LfLc7• TNAN SO CiLAYf OL OR•ARK ails• O O* M•AC LTY CLAYS OF LOW FL•STIC7TT if OrtAA•C SN.Tf, IN ICA C I S OR MH a•To•uctOVI Fill SAID OR SILTY 10ILS NONE TM•N s0% SILTS OF N•T[RI•L I!• A AIR UOulO LIMIT I CLA R•OR•YK CLAYS of HISS saLL[N lTM• $0 CLAYS I CAT1R TMA1 {O ft PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS 200 SIEY( SITE 04{ARIC CLAYS OF N(OMAI TO MISR OH FLAfncrrY, QN{ANC SILTS i;. ' ;_•, KA T. nurse•, Sr%NO SOILS MINILY OR•ARIC 70K2 PT wing MI{M OR{•RIC CONY t•ITs r TOPSOIL Humus and Duff Layer I Uncontrolled with FILL Highly Variable Constituents NOTE: DUAL 1T16110Ls ARE u{EO TO INDICATE •ORO[NLIRt SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART _. TIE pSCuISCEI IN TIC Tr XT OF THIS Rt ORT IS NEC(7SARY FOR • R O(R URD(RSTANOIN• OF THE NATURE OF TIE NAT(RI•L M(7(RT(0 In TM( ATTACHED LOSS j 2R0.D.Split Spoon Sampler r j[ Ring or Shelby Sample P Sampler Pushed Earth41114 Sample Not Recovered • Consultants Inc. V Water Level (date) Ts Torvane Reading LEGEND qu Penetrometer Readings IIIIi Water Observation Well L .NO.l625 [Date Aug: '81 Iate 24 TEST PIT NO. .- Logged By J RD Daft 8112/81 Elev. 57± Depth W ft.) USCS Soil Description 0 SM Brown gravelly silty SAND, medium dense, moist . 11 FILL) 5 --( :: SI1 Brown to gray SAND with gravel and silt, medium SP dense to dense, moist 6 10 Test Pit terminated at 10.5 feet. No groundwater seepage observed. 15 ---- Logged By J RD Data 8/12/81 TEST PIT NO. __Elev. 65± 0 SM Brown gravelly silty SAND, medium dense, dry to 4 moist (FILL) 5 SM Gray gravelly silty SAND grading to gravelly SAND SP with silt, medium dense to dense, moist 9 10 Test Pit terminated at 11.0 feet. No groundwater seepage observed. 15 TEST PIT LOGS r. APARTMENT SITE Earth y RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1625 ' Date Aug. '81 'Plate 3 TEST PIT NO. Logged By JRD Data 8/12/81 Elev. 73± Depth W . ft.) USCS Soil Description 96) 0 v.t• SM Brown gravelly silty SAND, medium dense, moist 11 FILL) 1:::11] SM Brown silty SAND with gravel , medium dense, moist 15 441 St1 Brown SAND with silt, medium dense, moist 11 10 SP Test Pit terminated at 11.0 feet. No groundwater seepage observed. 15 - Logged By JRD Date 8/12/81 TEST PIT NO. Pt1+ Elev. — 0 SM Brown gravelly silty SAND,medium dense,moist (FILL) 21 qu=4.5 FIL Tan SILT with sand, hard, moist tsf 0! 5 16 SM Brown silty fine SAND, medium dense, moist lo 20 Test Pit terminated at 12.0 feet. No groundwater seepage observed. 15 TEST PIT LOGS Ii APARTMENT SITE RENTON, WASHINGTONEarthtr": y Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1625 IDate Aug. '81 'Plate 4 TEST PIT NO. Logged By JRD Date 8/12/81 Elev. 67± Depth ft.) USCS Soil Description 0 - - 8 SM Brown gravelly silty SAND, medium dense, dry to 5 moist (FILL) 12 10 —11 . .SM Brown SAND with silt and gravel , medium dense, 14 SP moist Test Pit terminated at 12.0 feet. No groundwater seepage observed. 15 Lowed By JRD Date 8/12/81 TEST PIT NO.6 Elev. 74-± 0 8 5 SM Brown gravelly silty SAND, medium dense, dry to 13 moist (FILL) 10 SM Brown silty SAND, medium dense, moist 26 Test Pit terminated at 12.0 feet. No groundwater seepage observed. 15 TEST PIT LOGS fi 1 APARTMENT SITE Earth t RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1625 I Date Aug. 1811Plate 5 TEST PIT NO. _Jr__ Logged By JRD Date_ 8/12/81 Elev. 100± Depth W ft.) USCS Soil Description 0 1 9 li 5 SM Brown silty gravelly SAND, medium dense to dense, zt: dry to moist 12 1r1 22 10 --, , ML Tan SILT with sand, very hard, moist 22 q 4.5 tsf Test Pit terminated at 13.0 feet. Moderate 15 r groundwater seepage observed between 8.5 and 10.5' . Logged By JRD Date 8/12/81 TEST PIT NO. 8 per. 109± 0 6" loose gravelly silty SAND) 21 q =4.5 u tsf ML Tan SILT with sand to sandy SILT, moist, hard 5 _ 27 10 Hr. SM Tan silty fine SAND, dense, moist 18 ML Tan SILT with sand, hard, moist 25 Vts5 Test Pit terminated at 13.0 feet. 15No groundwater seepage observed. TEST PIT LOGS i' ) 1 APARTMENT SITE RENTON, WASHINGTON Earthc 5. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Prof. No. 1625 bats Aug. '81 1at 6 TEST PIT NO. Logged By JRD Date 8/12/81 Elev. 45± Depth W ft.) USCS Soil Description 96) 0 •••• 13 SM Brown gravelly silty SAND, medium dense, dry to 5 •;•;•; moist (FILL) 10 e• 10 SM Brown silty gravelly SAND, medium dense, moist 9 r#i Test Pit terminated at 13.0 feet. No groundwater seepage observed. 15 Logged By D Date 8/12/81 TEST PIT NO. ..._ a__ Elev. 45± 0 . 6 5 —` j: SM Brown SAND with gravel and silt, loose grading to 6J.SP medium dense, dry to moist 10 — 5 Test Pit terminated at 12.0 feet. No groundwater seepage observed. 15 - TEST PIT LOGS j f / 1 APARTMENT SITE Earth tty y RENTON, WASHINGTON Consultants 1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1625 I Date Aug. '81 'Plate 7 TEST PIT NO. II Logged By JRD Date 8/12/81 Elev. 70± Depth W n.) USCS Soil Description 0. 1111 a. 4 5 SM Tan SAND with silt and gravel , loose to medium SP dense, dry to moist 13 10 ---= 22 Test Pit terminated at 12.0 feet. No groundwater seepage observed. 15 --- I TEST PIT LOGS 41) 7:APARTMENT SITE EarthRENTON, WASHINGTON ConsultantsCon Inc, r, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1625 1 Date Aug. '81 'Plate 8 TEST PIT NO. Logged By JRD Date 8/12/81 Elev. 58± Depth yy ft.) USCS Soil Description 96) 0 i i i 41i1; i 5 SM•; Brown gravelly silty SAND, medium dense, dry to moist, with some organic debris and asphalt (FILL)• 17 10 , 0 A• 21 4 15 : :1:H:3 SM Tan SAND with silt, medium dense, wet 33 Test Pit terminated at 15.0 feet. Moderate groundwater seepage at 14.0 feet. 20 TEST PIT LOGS APARTMENT SITE h A RENTON, WASHINGTON Eartconsultants GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING a GEOLOGY Proj. No. 1625 J Date Aug. 181 hate 9 SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSISSIZEOFOPENINGININCHESINUMBEROFMESHPERINCH. U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM O O O O O O O O O 0G ID V M N q j ,. M a N V W , O S. O O O O O O O O OmAtoo 01 LRI H Z Vii 90 11 _ 10 Fi .Y d m 0 m eo k 20 z m 70 0 m 30 73 RI 13 A 111\ z ws m 60 Z 40 --I Ip m C) 0 W 1 50 Dpi 73 73 m l \,, 60 C)I03 30 70 M m O. 20 2 X. 80 .. Z o 10 so rn N M G) cn z 3:z. XJ 0 1 I L l l 11 I L [I l l I L l I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I III 1 100OO00OOOOOO10Op) N pp W. (r) N 7- 2. M N cp aQ73 —. 0 0 0 O t0 R ) N '- O O O O O O O O O O O OOzGRAINSIZEINMILLIMETERS0qo000 V ' '—' COBBLES COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE FINESmNGRAVELSANDDzm I c = KEY Boring or DEPTH r-USCS DESCRIPTION Moisture 0o --I m -< Test Pit No. (ft.)Content (%) LL PL z N Q-- TP-1 2 SM Gravelly silty SAND 11IIIM- o 0-- TP-5 6 SM Gravelly silty SAND 12 CD TP-9 2 SM Gravelly silty SAND 13 TP-11 7 SP/SM SAND with gravel and silt 13 Q SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIZE QF OPENING IN INCHES 1 NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH. U.S.STANDARD _GRAIN SIZE IN MM a 0 0 O0v0 0 0 0 0 0 pNa O O OOO OO 00DVClN .- M (! M , V p m A 100 tc, C. 0 1 rCrl1m I I IP( h 90 I 10 80 20 m m Z t myn m 70 30Z0.1 m n z mCrlA A • ZO 60 z 40 ) m O 1 D5050 ClOW r I Cl, o47t is 0 DJao60 m co I 30 70 m 0 p 20 80 I z I- O 10 90 rn t N m 7o 0 TI TT ET- I T —1 TTT El I I DTI I--i— i-I--'— Z D D 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 co (n v Cl N Co 0 '1'. Cl. N .7 o) Elp M N O 100 I -O "' N0 0 00 (O er M N '" O O O O O O O O O O Z A z GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS ' ' ' ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 N._, I COARSE l FINE COARSE MEDIUM1 FINE m m N COBBLES GRAVEL SAND FINES D z m D N --I c = D N Boring or DEPTH Moisture r- KEY Test PitNo. USCS DESCRIPTION co -H m ft.)Content (%) LL PL z N a}— 1 TP-12 8 SM Gravelly silty SAND 17 0— TP-8 2 ML Sandy SILT 21EY CD ENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE 073 - 84 dn tkodvhfrud