Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA84-075BE ,7111414/41i461 OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED e 115 - 84- 1r/ OF Rh, A. I. fri o THE CITY OF RENTON U ` ..4-` Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 O . ' ` r rnVfit BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9A O'FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 094T D SEP tst, 1 I September 7, 1984 Mr. Don Thomas P. O. Box 88339 Seattle, Washington, 98188 U, RE: File No. SA-075-84; Don Thomas, Applicant Dear Mr. Thomas: The Examiner'Is Report regarding the referenced application which was published on August 23, 1984 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, c . 44,- V-0---•"" Fred J. Kau an Land Use Hearing Examiner FJK:dk 0689E cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department Tom Sconzo I 1 1 i I AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 23rd ! day of August 1984, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation; with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. 4611 SUBSCRIBED AND 'SWORN to before me this ,3 day of a C.0 j L/1.ti 1984. 1 e.4zZ‘. Not y Public 'n and For the State of Washington, Iresidingat therein. Application, Petition, orr Case #: DON THOMAS - SA-075-84 The minutest contain a list of the parties of record.) I I I I 0663E August 23, 1984 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT:I DON THOMAS I FILE NO. SA-075-84 LOCATION: 800 block of Seneca Avenue S.W. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: ! Site Plan approval to allow a two-story, 21,500 sq. ft. office and warehouse building. The building will consist of 18,500 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 3,000 sq. ft. of office space. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT:received by the Examiner on August 9, 1984. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on August 14, 1984, at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. • The following exhibits were entered into the record: I Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application and other documents pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Specific Site ' Plan showing proposed building. Exhibit #3 - Corrected elevations map. The Hearing Examiner called the hearing to order and called upon the Zoning Administrator, Roger Blaylock to present the staff report. Mr. Blaylock stated the subject property was originally platted as part of the Earlington Industrial Park No. 2, but became a separate parcel on July 1, 1968. There will be no impact to schools; fire protection will be provided by the City of Renton; and water, sewer and storm drainage are available to the site. It was stated that development of the facility will generate approximately 130 trips pe I day. The applicant will be required to participate in a traffic signal at S.W. Grady Way and Powell Avenue as well as a signal at S.W. 7th.Street and Hardie 'Ave. S.W. The total amount due for the signals will be required when the building permit ,is isued. _Mr. Blaylock noted that in July of 1967 the City Council, on the recommenda ion of the Planning Commission, approved a variance to allow a 17-1/2 ft. variance in 6-le cul-de-sac instead of 60 ft., but, in 1971 the city attorney rendered a decision regarding the stab s,of variances approved prior to April 5, 1971 which said in part that variances prior to April; 5, 1971 were only good for 2 years, or until April 5, 1973. In essence, this decision made the variance invalid because the site was not developed. The Hearing Examiner questioned if the decision from the attorney was in writing. Mr. Blaylock said there is no written decision because there is a pending appeal on another variance. It was noted that the applicant, Don Thomas does not plan to utilize the revised variance language. Mr. Blaylock stated the proposal complies with the Parking and Loading Ordinances and it is! possible in the future there will be modifications to interior office space, which may affect the Latecomers Agreement. The Fire Department was concerned about the access around the perimeter of the building as well as access to the storage yard. The building will have to go through a fire flow analysis. 1 DON THOMAS SA-075-84 August 23, 1984 Page 2 Mr. Blaylock stated the building department's modified site plan will ensure trucks can do all backing orj private property, with no maneuvering on the streets. It was felt trucks up to 40 ft. would have no problem maneuvering on-site but larger trucks would have trouble because there is approximately 60 ft. in front of the truck doors and it takes approximately 90 ft. to t rn. The Hearing Examiner stated the Parking and Loading Ordinance requires all maneuvering to take place on private property and stated_if the City Ordinance requires all maneuvering to take place on- site, then the site plan should take that requirement into account or smaller trucks should visit the site. Mr. Blaylock stated we should require special set backs or specialized loading areas, and the problem that may arise, from a planning point of view, is when we allow.more offices in certain areas we will have traffic from offices competing with warehouse traffic. He said staff would recommend this project with conditions regarding secondary access and striped fire lanes through the storage area on the east side of the property and long the north,end of the property ine. The Hearing Examiner cal ed for testimony from the applicant or their representative. Responding w s: Tom Sconzo 919 - 124th N.E. Bellevue, Wa. 98005 Mr. Sconzo stated he agreed;with the recommendations of staff. He said the building on the property is approx. 50 ft. back from the planting strip giving them a 60 ft. setback, along with extensive landscaping, which can be reduced to allow them to enter on the site and still make the proper space available for on-site maneuvering for the larger trucks. They will hie both 40 ft. and 60 ft. trucks coming to the site. He said the cab of the larger trucks turning on-site will come to the edge of the property. Mr. Sconzo stated if they can hav a reduction in the landscaping required, there should be no problem. Calling for further testimony;in support of the application, speaking was: Don Thomas P. O. Box 88339 Seattle, Wa. 98188 Mr. Thomas tated in support of the parking maneuvering area, their operation is not a manufacturing operation but a distribution operation and receives approximately 3 or 4 over-the-road trailers a day; so whatever maneuvering area is required they could designate they end door for the large trucks and the other doors for the smaller trucks. He said they woyld prefer not to;have to move the building back if possible. The Hearing Examiner called; for testimony in opposition of the request. There was no one else wishing to speak. Mr. Blaylock commented on Section 4-2205 of the Parking and Loading Ordinance with reference to loading space and the fact that no portion of a vehicle taking part in loading or unloading should project into a public street or alley. He said the concern he has is that_maneuvering is not addressed very clearly in the ordinance where it should be; whether the public right-of-way should be used or not. He had no further comments. With no other persons wishing to testify or comment, the hearing was closed at 9:28 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the , following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Don Thomas, filed a request for approval of a site plan for a two-story combined office and warehouse building. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPM documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non- Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by 'the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), responsible official. DON THOMAS SA-075-84 August 23, 1984 Page 3 4. Plans for the proposal.have been reviewed.by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject site is located on the east side of the 800 block of the Seneca Ave S.W. cul-de-sac. The site is located in the approximate, middle of the original Earlin ton Industrial Park. 6. The subject site was annexed into the city in April of 1959 by Ordinance 1745, as amended by Ordinances 1764 and 1928. The site was automatically zoned General upon annexation. The site was reclassified to M-P (Manufacturing Park) by Ordinaece 2205 in January, 1966. While a variance from setback provisions had been approved for the subject site in 1967, the applicant has not utilized the variance, nor do they intend to do so. 7. The subject site could be described as two separate terraces with approximately a 6 foot ;difference in elevation, but both relatively level. The western portion of the site is the lower area. 8. The site is vacant and is generally covered with scrub brush and grasses. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located'as suitable for the development of manufacturing type uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 10. The applicant proposes erecting a two-story tilt-up concrete building with painted panels. The building; will serve both the applicant's office and warehousing needs. The office use will be on a mezzanine. 11. The structure will contain approximately 21,500 square feet of space to be divided between office and warehouse. The building will consist of 18,500 .square feet of warehouse space and13;000 sq ft of office space. 12. - The applicant proposes providing 37 parking stalls whereas the proposed complex would only require 28 stalls. The additional stalls would permit conversion of some warehousing space to office space. 13. The applicant has proposed landscaping along the front yard and along the south side yard as well as interior landscaping. The landscaping proposed is in excess of that required by City Code. 14. Due to access and, maneuvering requirements the applicant may modify the landscaping along the front yard. 15. The Fire Department Figs indicated a second access will be required together with a marked fire lane through the storage yard` CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposed site plan appears to serve the public use and interest. The two-story warehouse/office will provide some additional employment opportunities in the City and fills in an existing lot with access to the necessary utilities. 2. The building will blend with the other warehousing operations in the area, will provide more than adequate parking, and will be landscaped. 3. Since conflicts between passenger cars and large trailer rigs can create a dangerous situation,' maneuvering on the public right-of-way must be prevented. Backing, turning and maneuvering should be confined to the industrial site and not occur across either public sidewalks or streets. All maneuvering therefore, must occur on the subject site. Landscaping modifications to allow this operation may be req U ired but should not degrade the overall landscaping plan. 4. - The additional parking may permit alteration or conversion of some warehouse space to office space which would allow internal expansion to occur. 5. Fire safety concerns of the City must be met and both a second access and a designated fire lane established. I ' DON THOMAS SA-075-84 August 23, 1984 Page 4 DECISION The site plan is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. All truck maneuvering must occur on the subject site. 2. A second access point subject to approval of the Fire Department must be provided to the subject site. 3. A marked fire lane through the storage area must be provided subject to approval of the Fire Department. ORDERED THIS 23rd day of August, 1984. Fred J. Kauf a Land Use Hea ' g Examin r TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd clay of August, 1984 to the parties of record: Don Thomas P. O. Box 88339 Seattle, Wa. 98188 Tom Sconzo 919 - 124th N.E. Bellevue, Wa. 98005 TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of August, 1984 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Gene Williams, Policy Development Department • Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before Setember 6, 1984. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further ction as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in th1e Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur' concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers ;in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council.; All communications concerning the the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request) by the Court. The Doctrine applies not ;only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. II z 44110Arirrit--''' '...‘•‘,.11, 40 -'eta iT. . sr p'grLR C e Ile 0 J gee , R-1 0 in i 1 I 5u ` -3 i. i S I7 si tfl t, ct.% ----- i tZIP,•' 1 . t.• t: \ is i"tiL..• \ \ 1 LU •.,' OI 4 I v..;1 t Q. tER , _0.0 I.,I S I. NOR'g p,TIT Z- iiiipotlx:F.,:i', e+_ il '. NIA..k, : r 1; III 1 .. W111 III IIIld . 11 : I IC 0 4: aril isirip . . file • . ; : , I . i I DON THOMAS SA-075-84 ci APPLICANT DON THOMAS . TOTAL AREA - 1.42 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS SENECA AVENUE S.W. E EXISTING ZONING M-IP, MANUFACTURING. PARK EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY PROPOSED USE A TWO 1 STORY, 21,500 SQ.FT. BUILDING FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE JSES. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK E COMMENTS I H l. f1 1 • _Li r ! I 3 tiLtIrirtiili , fp----.— ______: ---N_a•° S.171-G lia S'' p id-- -....._ 04.1-ur,wa Troce.wan,.---,.1 LI 3''M CIVIr..0.4..) • I 7, 1 I'irriruart-.rwentri\ i di,20 i a ..7...ri 1 i I4..d.f-ia. sa..d gave 7 — - 1 _ _ 0, 0 . 1,1117 gli• •--) t=L.war-vast I 1 s, Id-.:1' -_-.,.-1-•-.''"-'7----eml-..d_. :------- so-a,) 2,,v4g cza.g il7 0 —, tatrilil./ MINI\, i • .X Xi I 112.1.ALCM fISC• . V I L—.11 Z 4' I .71,1 b.K C.WOU C. es.R[A.,. VW 54‘1125 • 4,114. -taxa&is. - . I • . L_;., , • 4 ruc.. 13:1 •_ ;03 1t 1 : 7-4 --• . i . f i , 1 0. • - ", \ law gal mc I 4fAt/i- 7.'1' 2_1 -_. .JIL. ..111.. .-- I N.R\I:SSICCSR\ st, I ,PIM s• if or.'i s•--orricag '.11.114'-Or - storm-nem-0r,.. _ .,...,.. ,MS ••PTITETIltiC.1- PAT Nzicirfrrr 1-1,-.r c r- j__.:11)..4.."" 1. 745 cw..“...m. 4 .----;.-.7. -`4"4"'"ia.cr it..tot—-;< I. LOT MA 19:I•ST./ AM, 61443 /.LARISCATIM.0. 4 O2' El :i1. — •-•-...--4 e 1 COILOSIS norTISIIrtssa9.51 to.m. 10,-0.STIOn MOW.10.-O•man. SI reaus LOT au-.0 So. SIRSTS4•41. TO,1 -1--,,, ,..i- MCI tp.W.r r.nuolat C TOTOL nanctie1 OJOS TS Mk SIR WY ILI,5 p.I I • AM sp.n...alia.c___...."'"- Ail i I 3...ma.r...ritta, ...ALA_ 1,¢ 104.1---/ i i e.......„,__-- 1, St.I.S. n. S. luILIMAS flan-12•-0- 4., 6 •••,,_ I i I. TOTAL SO.n• I.= S. hunIM STO. rI.SCS SO .7. so.COSIAI 1/ISSO SO.TI..TT 3 STALLS I i I OTT la Inoo SO.IT..TS 0 STALLS.,,,,—./. • T-- 4 j...a,-.TICIL•..IV:TOM KO • P./STALL, Atr4.4-.1.6_,,...., MAIMS 161 MA 4."•.• mum var. II STALLS VVIAILVIAT - CI GI.1 0 il, ..ECII4OCISS r-rortnrio . 11fLCDINC.T----- It-MOSIC -TV 1.K INI cYV;-1:1 1-1m-IDLINci 1„._____p_____., I, K.r....no,,, 14,5,•41,4Tcn . L_LC_C4 ks--L---D-f_ eFr-tor,4 I 1,--,-7 L /.\ l'-i LOT 4.MUT rme own ad,.1111 AMC..MUMMA 1=6111AL r.... AO.I.AZOSITIC TO lai AM IsSALIN IMMO IS Mal LI OP MITI,PACI MONA!A aSLZ 11:7277—'—e IL.Is Alm Com.ossuussm,a AIWA=Sr Wm..amo 1101.11•8 Aasett- Loop.L.31¢...•a....., A._ 1 pr.r. r.1 tr-I- 01 y)? ,?,.. :.C1-'' _,1.- 1 Affidavit of Publication•1 S 17 JO STATE OF WASHINGTON AU G I(0)ggq Liiii COUNTY OF KING ss. Cindy Strupp being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that Shf'r is the chief cleric of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been r -.,: .;•.- 3 for more than six moths prior to the 'ate of publication referred to, k x,Y,a,-. 'S°'3 ••ii . • fit; printed and published n the English language continually as a newspaper i i''"` c,, i published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is el -m. .-' `Q.:;- now and during all of said time wasprinted jin an office maintained at the 6- p. = .c aforesaidplace ofpublication of said newspaper.That the'DailyRecord Uif .. :, Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior 81.5.. o Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, 3 ERCAorzovich g Washington.That the annexed is a a maze 2 ..i• ,::: WccA mN.r as it was published in regular issues(and y co N. L as•-22 o;_ not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period mi•- 1° U gu.ccg f a.a. 4_._ Z....ai-_._P- 0,6 one 2.c:: %,: m. wi 6 of consecutive issues,commencing on the E c i 5 ° G_ •4r c. 9thdayof K July 19 84 z Z 'li W -7 s o(6o-and ending the 3' O c`3 a .v.(.0® Q,•4, o mW p> = t8 '- Q a day of 19 ,both dates UOFCWa¢ ¢ ` $o AU .5'1 inclusive, and.that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- 3 c 8,_g_ w $a m scribers during all of said period. That 'the full amount of the fee L5 m'' m•$g2•r- € o C c-m ZWZ_ OCy Y2 .°c3 gWp36 char ed for the foregoing publication is the sum of $..1$.r. which 2 2." Q--0 Z_V t N.m£t OOele2m'°`O1 g g g Z QQ m ia.:(% : S,.rg has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the OO:; 2 w c LL E. `o a. a o' first insertion'and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent Q m •<9• .v 6 z c t° insertion.1 o T Q.: n• c c Q" Z Chief .Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 9th. day of July 19....94 ewp.,,, Notary Pub is in or the State of Washington, esiding at% , King Couny. Federal Way Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955.1 Western Union Tell graph Co. rules for, counting words and figures, adopted bylthe newspapers of the St IteJ 1 VN 087 Revised 5l62 CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 14, 1984 I AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M. COUNCIL C AMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. I I DON THOMAS Application for site plan approval to allow a two-story, 21,500 square foot office land warehouse building, file SA-075-84; located along the east side of Seneca Avenue S.W at the 800 block. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY Application for special permit for fill and grade permit involving 9,500 cubic yards of fill for la switching track, file SP-078-84; located at the 1700 block of S.W. 43rd Street, between S.W. 43rd Street and the Renton/Tukwila city liimits for a distance of about 1,400 feet. SCHOBER ENTERPRISES, INC. Application for temporary use permit to allow a mobile home to be used as a nighti watchman residence at the Schober Enterprises, Inc., facility for a period of less than two years, file TP-084-84; located at 1800 Monster Road S.W. 1037Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 14, 1984 APPLICANT: DON TH OMAS FILE NUMBER: SA-075-84 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to allow a two-story, 21,500 square foot office and warehouse building. The building will consist of 18,500 square feet of warehouse space and 3;000 square feet of office space. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Don Thomas 2.; Applicant: Don Thomas 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) 800 block of Seneca Avenue S.W. 4. L gal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department. 5. Size of Property: 1.42 acres 6. . Access: Seneca Avenue S.W. 7. E isting Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: M-P, Manufacturing Park 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park 10. 1 Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on August 3, 1984, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by city ordinance on August 3, 1984. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject was annexed into the City of Renton by Ordinance #1745 of April 14, 1959, $which was later corrected by .Ordinance #1764 of May 19, 1959 and Ordinance #1928 of December 12, 1961. The property upon annexation was zoned G, General Use. This zoning designation was later changed from G. General Use, to M-P. Manufacturing',Park, by Ordinance #2205 of January 17, 1966. The subject property was then platted and became known as "Earlington Industrial Park No. 1." Final approval of the plat was granted August 28, 1967, with the passages of Resolution No. 1478 by the City Council (see filed PP-401-67, V-409-67, and FP-415-67). Later, July 1, 1968, the plat was amended allowing the subject property to become a separate lot. I PRELIMINARY REPORT HE HEARING EXAMINER DON THOMAS: SA-075-84 A AUGUST 14, 1984 PAGE 2 D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The western most portion of the property is approximately 6 feet lower .than the rest of the site. Both areas of the site tend to be relatively flat. 2. Soils: Urban Land (Ur). This soil has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations. The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. No capability or woodland classification. 3. Vegetation: The subject site is covered with grasses and scrub brush. 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides. some habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: Water was not observed on the subject site during a field visit to the property. 6. Land Use: .The subject site is currently undeveloped. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The area surrounding the subject site consist s. of warehousing and office uses Co the north; warehousing to the east; undeveloped property to the south; and warehousing activity to the west. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: A 12-inch water line is located along Seneca Avenue S.W. near the subject site. b. Sewer: An 8-inch sewer line is located along Seneca Avenue S.W. near to the subject property. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water flows into the Black River drainage system. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as ,per ordinance requirement . 3. Transit: METRO Transit Routes #199 and 340 operate along Lind Avenue S.W. approximately 850 feet northeast of the subject site. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Not applicable. b. Middle Schools: Not applicable. c. High Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation: j Not applicable. 1 G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section4-730, Manufacturing Park (M-P). 2. Section 4-744(F)(2), Landscape Requirements - Green River Valley. H. • APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Green River Valley Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium,p. 31-35. 2. Industrial Goal and Policies, Policy Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, p. 18-19. 1 PRELIMINARY REPORT ;THE HEARING EXAMINER DON THOMAS: SA-075-84j AUGUST 14, 1984 PAGE 3 I. . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: I , 1. Natural Systems: Development of the proposed office/warehouse building 4ill result in modification of the site with removal of dirt and vegetation. However, good construction practices can mitigate any negative effects as a result of development of the site. 2., Population/Employment: Minor. 3. Schools: Not applicable. 4. Social: Not applicable. 5. Traffic: Development of the proposed office/warehouse building is expected to generate approximately 129.7 (92.7 warehouse and 37 office) average daily trips. I J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a final Declaration of No significance was issued on July 3, 1984, by the Environmental Review Comm ttee. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building & Zoning Department. 2.. City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division. 5. City of Renton Police Department. 6. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 7., City of Renton Policy Development Department. 8. ity of Renton Parks & Recreation Department. L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, Don Thomas, is seeking site plan approval to allow a two-story, 21,500 square foot office and warehouse building. The building 01 consist of 0,500 square feet of warehouse space and 3,000 square feet of office space. 2. A question was raised by staff as to the legality of the apparent short platwhichsegregatedthesubjectpropertyfromtherestofBlock4ofthe Elarlington Industrial Park No. 1 Plat. Staff has since received documentation showing that the property was made a legal lot as a result of the recording of ah affidavit amending the plat on July 1, 1968. This procedure for segregating the property was legal in 1968. This action occurred prior to the adoption of State subdivision regulations in 1969 and the passage of a City Subdivision Ordinance in 1971. 3. A variance to Attie sixty (60) foot setback requirement was approved by the City Council on July 10, 1967. The Council approved a Planning Commission recommendation to' allow a setback variance in the cul-de-sac of 17-1/2 feet. This variance is no longer valid based on a decision made regarding the status of variances approved prior to April 5, 1971, when Ordinance No. 262.5 was passed placing) a two (2) year limitation on variances unless a site was developed. The decision, based upon discussions with the City Attorney, is that variances prior to April .5, 1971, were good only for two (2) years after April 5, 1971 or April 5, 1973. 4.' The subject pr posal is consistent'with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park and the present zoning designation M-P, Manufacturing Park. PRELIMINARY REPORT 1 HE HEARING EXAMINER DON THOMAS: SA-075-84 AUGUST 14, 1984 PAGE 4 5. The Environmental Review Committee has issued a final Declaration of Non-significance for the subject proposal. As an informational note, the Committee noted the following items which will be required: a. The provision of a second access to the parking area south of the building from the cul-de-sac. b. Payment of an assessment for a traffic signal installed at S.W. Grady Way and Powell Avenue S.W. and one installed at S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. as provided in a latecomer's agreement for the Washington Technical Center. The applicant will be required to pay 220.68 for the signal at S.W. Grady Way and Powell Avenue S.W. and 107.69 for the signal at S.W. 7th STreet and Hardie Avenue S.W. The total amount, $328.37, shall be due at the time of issuance of the building permit. 6. The propsed site plan provides more parking spaces than required by the Parking and Loading Ordinance. The applicant has 37 parking spaces when the proposed project requires only 27.3 parking spaces. 7. The applicant's landscaping plan exceeds the amount of required landscaping for the subject property. 8. The architectural treatment of the proposed building is compatible with that of buildings within the immediate area of the subject property. 9. Various City departments have reviewed the subject proposal. The Policy Development.Department, the Police Department, and the Parks Department approved the proposal without conditions. Traffic Engineering, Engineering, Utility Engineering and the Building Division approved the project subject to the following conditions: a. Traffic Engineering: 1) Payment of the assessment as provided for in the latecomer's agreement for the Washington Technical Center. b. Engineering: 1) Provide storm water retention/detention for the subject site. 2) Install a sidewalk across frontage. c. Utility Engineering: 1) Approved subject to satisfying the Fire Department's requirements. i d. Building Division: 1) Modify site plan to ensure that trucks can do all backing on private property. 10.The Fire Prevention Bureau did not approve the proposed site plan. The Department's comments are as follows: a. Access to building perimeter does not meet City requirements. b. Second access should be provided a point on the cul-de-sac in line with south drive. c. Sprinkler density will be required to meet demands according to type of warehousing proposed and for high piled stock. d. All hydrants within 300 feet of building to be depicted on plans. e. BuildinIg design required to meet Uniform Fire Code requirements for high piled storage. The concerns of the Fire Prevention Bureau expressed in items a and b should I be included in a modified site plan. Items c, d, and e can be addressed at the time the actual building plans are submitted for review. It should be, noted that the applicant may have to provide fire hydrants on the site as well as a looping water system in order to satisfy requirements of the Fire Prevention Bureau. PRELIMINARY REPORT '._ :HE HEARING EXAMINER DON THOMAS: SA-075-84 1 AUGUST 14, 1984 PAGE 5 M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above; analysis, the Building and Zoning Department recommends approval of the site Plan, file SA-075-83. subject to the following conditions: 1. Modification of a;site plan showing: a. The provision of a secondary access at a point on the cul-de-sac in line with the south drive. b. The striping of a twenty (20) foot fire lane through the storage area on the east side of the property and along the north property line. II I • 1.4.;. . ,r 4.° AD ' alif Pith * 17% i3fgdanil3 I 4 4 1-3 71. ..'"4't jig*d-, 11 11 '' , v ,:b 3 c,'1 N1.1i SucatCI ) 3 `%J °.S Q btle' I I a ------ -- 1 u, ° ui ir';J . a ti .1. • t. i Z I t t' s i"\i... .. I ti••. .. -' om s , ... A^ w r p I). t G. 1.--11 tl 10. n11l i lie CR I s 1' - . - T.:. 011 igL1NA 0 w l01!r!!i. : il 3111101 oliir V'• 4 IMY , fil impus i 1 -'- 111 I. I ci--d- iii 1 Jo -X ':j I 'NIIIP.w. , , DON THOMAS SA-075-84 i APPLICANT DON THOMAS TOTAL AREA - 1.42 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS SENECA AVENUE S.W. 1 EXISTING ZONING M;P, MANUFACTURING. PARK EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY PROPOSED USE ' A TWO STORY, 21,500 SQ.FT. BUILDING FOR OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USES. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK COMMENTS I I i f ulii.: 1Ii 1i1. 11! O 0 0 00• o„ I.....fji'..• F 0000 O0 O • 9 0 R 11'=• i- 1,.''.• k, I,,.... 1.-,1IlN`.'14 a—;l6. lV] ve.. Vpt• a 0 p. t k i.' poi.:_:.:' J .tti o ; 0 o o• d e o 11I1,- 1'.. o.• r.• o•! 1 i 10p,•4 o' t• 0 Oi r-_ uc O O O O O'OCOe•O©Onf1 ', 71•!.' i!a'- 4'''. - o°o- r,! 4.•O 0 O O 4 0 0 O 4 44 4 _a i' -- r ,.wLL•0o°oodo a• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 3 Y,t. F•0000°0000,:at.v 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 6% o, i o o'f.E•O O O o 0 0 0 t 0 o...• v 1,° 0;0°0 '— A j c o°o .0000 !'t` O © O if O®OOOOr j+A' "1' °0 o°.',HI II s .°oye°ggg' O O O O o•••• r' ., 1 N0 , O -O-Oo.r: 'C• f.•ooO 0000 O O C IC _\ 'O O • O `,, 11\\\ 0.,a • ' 000 000000,-y O O O t UI 011-—, t0o°O°O0•tr• ti; p p 1 I1. 7 0 1 00 °pp°o°o, • O e O Iu1 ® O O-jam,.0 0°o b L= 11.ram\ i ii: l o°°0000°o° , y`. E.o'o o ` Ilr :CY A 4_' 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] O O /fir-*.• 4- 4 , . _ i if00000°000000 jJ" ^...tea.. . Ju , ti il1:, °ogogo°o°o°YY VV %'J, ii ryrII0000000000'1i, Ir;t" I. G L 0 000° °0°0° 0 0 Too• n_,... v 000000°., 1 1 .000000 .0000° o o p 1 t i00000000. p. o 0 0 0 0 0 . 000 . ° n 1 NiltitibE,P ! i • c> n... 4 1: .11.. .. .000000 ' U..ii 4 iii ri i i-- l' 111-- a r o'o 0 0 0 0'v r`:r 2 s - o 0 0 0 0 o t I IOUIf0000°0°0°00o t I 11,... r 1.. r t O © 4 Et`e: Q 1 r"1 i•.o0°0°0°0°0° . 1 11 i •4, {' ri 1 3! k*sr $$l Il::ii• 0 0 0 0 0:11r •1 rll..] /! k ° 7 c O E c. 0 r : - .,' Y i 1 r 11 r/ICo '• r 4 r• f 4 fn tin^ R'°t3o`,\ I i oons t:nom osiI °'4 X•. 4.-. O' i !.r,o 1,u ono ii:ioiiu •r^+ ,, ? .. r_Ut5 a• , gyp)[•}(..-• :: ,!i•' t•%;o„ f•' i --- t ' ii / M.ro•,.11 r,O!/11 i a.; 'i.-: : I-' i.4: • ss { . t 1. . hWh ! per, 1 O ;' a ' tom' 1h k' ti } II. I y' r by.-— --- -•,, a' ' 1 1` 1 s. r ri fM Y(`I l ue' 1-;•-,11 r f'a , C ty 9{ r%11 f 1 goat y .' ry — Ir, 1I•0°0 Ulli` ow ' Cam. ex ,fj, ___ 000000000. ' _____ li 1': r` 1. o00o000000 y TN •• \' i 00000000000• r00000000000 :;'„' IEZ`'1_ 000000000000G •;',, -7t'r•'• y j4• f... 4.4, roo0oo0000000 . a C, t c 0000000000:';:'. 1 qo, 000000 Zroei SSt •r5i: 000000, t v 44 -0,1tiO.. 'kl ,';',111.„:%:* 155-11 t.' ‘ .44 iI itilll e 11 1¢` (n Y ---- --—__ __________1 `p 0000 t hi l'; YYY 0000 I lit rot ,c,.. • , , _____ ____ __-_ _ 1 .D,, , L_ r. r r. e `,, i j r t ------ —_ Ill 5: f 1,. ;. , 1•.' 1RF I 0 0000. " ` 000000IILi.,e.. • 9 - r;G .0000•C'. 0000°°. ' 1111 It ';'-' 7.000000 u. for ^ -:47 9,5 t Y•. .. r' s c• - -'-----T----- ---- I•! h,., _____ _- ____ -___ _____ __! ' I sir.:•''•. ii1t -- — °` i ce c% LAND z 'SE ELEMENT I` +- Single Family II Commercial 1 I zy Low Density Office / OffB P Multi-Family ;`\.`\•, ce a.'b J ! —.----- -. i i••`}:ti^•`•;• • • • i':•: Mediumery1Wp DensityEtyti .•>. > t tiff• Multi-Family . 00.000.0.00000.0000000000000 0'j 000000 h 000000010000000. 1 rr • 4 Public/Ouasi-P ubLc Light industrial 4 1. ,fir', o ®' r. . Recreation Heavy Industrial 1 i, I ,, Fes'rr••d. 3:x'L.° :' Greenbelt 1 Manufacturing Park, 4Gr i r .- ..._/ e /.._. .. ODD alp.nit n )l sst'uR a]OB.uulu u S O•011bnl•umf Mn n•01 rye.- • T1Mn ®1 t010 DV R N lO®nI'1'a 1 V 1 . - - 'J I S. .- 3191110 WIN.101 DM MUM{osn11r1•MOM!DI Y'rI DIM MI lmb•r NI 11V, 01 , a, Nowx:a 7NVU.l I_-- h• •vw- LifrlaNvtlyi1 M ON_: r—T-- 17NIQ71pQ a7c uo l1._ s>b. •{3 0 au - -ar+ _a szi y--laaLv LvTrs yY3_:. u f1T1IS s[ 01110/alt.r.01. r 9'f Lu'es_cru DV 1S0 OM '. Jf nntS 0SI 0•.rw 2 7 Lt71i f,4 -:oH-Ie- I S11YI50SI L'Of DWI DUO t Yam-44 ?nrn s'x1 Lt'OS m ut RbUA '11'or owl! l1'Os ma 'r 1 ,t7- in r 9D fraH '. . R'1 With i- t j o-.v•I1GIf!MID '. ou a®[ '! L1.J.R1- r S lbuor'u 11 Fr!: 0!IDDIlm11i301 ! oFil ` 2u'os m-I uu wlnu u AI MID 1 i 01.Ir0n4's1 IR Dal u•n 151naA 1 MI It III ` ' mn1% - 41+I+! 1} u.a.wxar Is ammo n" - Yr.'011 PI-0-.01-nls0r miss O.OI WI=101011n '! 0li flrr>01I,'! nrn '»r 1'u'osl DM am 'l 71ri1'M 11t P7RlL•il 1Vu J41NuIA_. V1VQ 17Nl L I -GL m : f _ Y'(FF i"''"— - 1 OS • -•---- .--<. . i•.<"iffe • 6 7, 41. wa.a,1 I a"1Q-11+VT 1 I. f 1_' f 1 r14 L_ Y] P - I_ ry1I.L,-.IL _1 Yv n nyvr Iasra 1- tI bra.0 Lam\ R t.• T+ ems s i , P-0-t PP t p-Q p „>> b-?t-•9— gn 1 i I S; • 11'opf1 R' i( I novn/n WILL-yaaln•P.10 Fr,.___ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 51 7 t' 1 1 1 1 la o- 2": L CT) 0 CI) C--) _. © CI _ () i 1 I (99en-r_19I 1 • : . I I • I, • I I. i• 1. I I I . " • I ct-r.rat-r-li:/141. o 1 1I1 '-' I I 21-. CC''' enr1-1t7- . I 1i I .I a- i N i I 1 -1 I i___ __ _i_ _____ mun.e.747 ni Anoo.Awn. ex Ic•cr•t.......sTelat.---- ptrai•--rn.r•-er-t4.nu,-milli* mt T17L CVATIOH rr,INTECS) L7-_MAn C. sie.rd __.., . I TiLT-iir Mar. 01.4-11.2.9?-o) -- e.,•,....: rIETS...ri.knimie, i I• • • I " .1'• • . • I. •• .1 • . . ;1 - . 1 ' I • .1 • I ' .-1'-1 I I _ 7 I 1 I I I i • 1 I• • fi . . I i I i I . j•4 I i 1. I I 1 - -•-•.1- -•.• : :... :-FL1! "• . .i. " :::' 9 l' SAJCI=a 1 1 51.141.11flt 1 N L-5T L L:VAT 10 I-1 IMMIIMIIIIICalane EA-Fl ccarr.-TIL.T.11 •IOW rneett, conc.-T=1r'-1.1mr.--ramiLm_ CD T 4.01-,.-1117:451-PL.C.51414L6541try\ 1..(rwriTto.)_t_-=-4tracres0 r . I I 1 Tir-isbx undoit . _L...i.6c..cxl1w. 6I. otr•r..Sa...t_.c._r i.t-. 'I • ' i 7. E..tre.Z w•._ i I It ' ll ' IIIIV' 1 i ...... V1f.7.14.e.JR:ac 9 i- L 1 " ....., rrt.Arz Casran) I I c. 1 lifHlnilill1 i/ 177L51.1 CSIVADE 1 0 1 VrT14.1t-12:01CITIV.V.. htaKTH n L VA TION r-rcoros ED .EDUILD i N q1am.v...)_ _L C.VAT ION r..L.,...a. ye,.r.e . NV,714 t:170-1- I-1A H p L_I J-4-.x.n.L.e vi.1d i ! MOWN A.E.CON'20 4i -;--- I a rJno g i ii x._ z 1 g 10 g a o v ig 0 g I 0. 0 II yy d b a 9 3 i_ I J l 9 R H 14 1 . ii- 9 91 E 9 ili NI y or r j = 0A . rogiii11 CE ab06t. a ! o t '' 1 • i II' 1i, 1 I , I j , a n fir' voa: r. 3ioms w i yea 4t4i Ta: oou5Warit c 1 k? b 01rIe o + fi3ip 11111.( o o, 4 lo$ I S I .; 4p G optla NJ./ d d I* ti5z 1 I 6 II o mere: , Wilkeo iouIIe- oi tioaIR61' 0440s: aofsbroo=.> etiS• e 2 goL 1 KtV1 W1IVl7 1J rAKIIvItIVI/Ulv15i/IV ; A- J / /A., / z `iji , ( C':1•- /I) ' APPROVED E` PROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Fey-- /./' G-.,., 6 c 1..c 4./ (t:.''. . fir, ` Jr J; 1 d•-s - L. -c-* -6 ,. - f,p(! /C' ,7,KI1 _.f/e 74.( ,.ft ii / 31.—.) I!i-,74 i,, ,.-_. Wit.,._•, // /i. , J ' . , L l l / 7f,5/- L- ///). / Y ' /Y-. ,Lam. i 6/ Z--)--) 77 14, tvi DATE : J ,-- 4 • --)( / %`-/ SIGNATURE OF DI ECTOR OR AUTHOR REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1 82 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : flPROVED ri APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED 1 i q.._ (Z._,,, r DATE ; ,. - SIGA RE OF DIRE,... 1. 2Lf.l.'(). ;1_fv.____c TOR A ; ORIZ REPRES NATIVE REVISION 5/1982 i Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : GG RAPPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED HOC DATE : 7--s- SIGNAT rOF RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1,982 U ENGINEERING D 3I0N TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : SOUTIL TIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT DPOLICE DEPARTMENTOli POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00THERS : COMMENTS OR SU ' GESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT B 5 :00 P ,M, ON JULY 2,I 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIS1ON ; i(-i i Ei APPROVED MAPPROVED WITH, CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVE) MLITT APPROVAL SVIIECT 11 i /2-04 9TE ;COMERS ARKEMENT • WATER 0 LASE COWERS AMREEMENT • SEINER A/Q' 7Z6 12 STSIE$ DEVILMENT I`itARiE MAIER f5' 0.t 4/&2P1 X G(G i/3 40 1/ 5. SYSTEM IETELSPMEIT CNARCE SEWER y/,Es O.0f/S9'.FTX la/,l?4/3z:- 7 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER GI o 7i /3/. 4 SP CI'AL ASSESSMENT AREA CRONE - SEWER A/Q fPPROTED WATER PLAN yA'S ISPROTEO SEWER PLAN ,5 tedlYat t:PROVED FIRE NYIRANT LOU TMIS IY FIRE DEFT S 111E FLOW ANALYSIS YES' ' g6P, , I DATE: / ? /S¢ SIGNATURE OF DIRE'TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE r 'qq1113 REVISION 5/ Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVE) 4-(( hcx- re 5 S i 72--C/P7ci!5-/X( 2]:--- eft.7) DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : C.C. 1 ft APPROVED 5J 'kUVED WITH CONiiiTIONS F-1 NOT APPROVED uc_/S A v'O AX me_- -- jnck , ,_}—ic, rf o 6 -7-X e -- -i 51/T - f---2z_._ A__,./0 6 /16e/ /- ° 'up 74_ G /I/07U 6 At., 4 G•C G CO L -/ I 747,V6----------n; GDATE : ° ^ SIGNATURE OF ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE j REVISION 5/1982 I F rm 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; APPROVED EIAPPROVEDIN WITH CONDITIONS 1NOT APPROVED i i( A/ g l/' D_ 4. e) .__ _,,c230-teeer__//,/,-e-ke L5ee)/ -‘1? ) , a5 I DATE : SIGNATURE OF DI RECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 F.rm 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /7/e APPROVED F-1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 4,67 Sf To a>i z7.iJ G ."—F-.iA-/E:-rEc 2)o=,S- A,,:,7 T r7,.•'F-•_- ij, /_7a..47 7/'-'- '12),C..- 2-14` " G?JG --IT,E -J G IA) G/"..J- (,{)/7i-4 •S,UT/ /'i cc-7 f--;,d —2 E/Td Gi.)/ec r c-QG//,E"E=,e5) %, N16c:7— Dc./1/9.v,0.5 A!Co2,o,4)6 ' Ta f//c'Gc © GJ<}r27c /la,Js/a>c: / op•...re.c) A4/!_? • ,/` 116/-1 /"IG ® —7—Cif • Ste• 44e / { PZ.V/ IT.S ; L)/TN/ ) . vc e-T C7(/L CD/N G 7) t>c ib /viG DEL' OOA) 23 4.t ." . V)/4,677%v; 7 s'%G?/ h=',-Ca///e /) 1E6T U c rg ')/A-E/-+ —;-,, A-D G.4/ f'/G 6 S—..-- a 1 GC DATE : 7 i' - ,r SIGNAT E D R TOR OR AUTHORIZED -REPRESENTATIVE 1 I REVISION 5/1982 0451N FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE i Application No(s): SA-075-84 Environmental Checklist No. ECF-072-84 Description of Proposal:Application for site plan approval to allow a two-story, 21,500 square foot office and warehouse building. Proponent: Don Thomas Location of Proposal: Located along the east side of Seneca Avenue S.W. at the 800 block. Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on July 3, 1984, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Michael Parness, Richard Houghton, Gene Williams, Roger Blaylock, Jerry Lind, and Ronald Nelson. Incorporated by reference i ,the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-072-84 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Dennis A. Sconzo, dated June 19, 1984. 2. Applications: Site Plan Approval (SA-075-84). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, .Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities Engineering Division, Policy . Development Department, Parks and Recreation Department, and the Police Department. 4. Recommendation for more information: Fire Prevention Bureau. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not ihaveasignificantadverse. mpact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject proposal will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties. INFORMATION: 1. Second access is to be provided to the parking area south of the building from the cul-de-sac. 2. Per a late corner's agreement (Washington Technical Center), assessment for traffic signal installations at S.W. Grady Way and Powell Avenue S.W., and S.W. 7th Street and Hardie.*Av,enue S.W. shall be $220.68 and $107.69 respectively, for a total of $328.37. This amount shall be due at the time the building permit is issued. SIGNATURES: Ronald G. Nelson is ael P ess Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor chard C. Houg ton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: July 9, 1984 APPEAL DATE: July 23,.1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 072 _ 84 APPLICATIQN No(s) : 1PROPONENT: DON THOMAS PROJECT TITLE: NORTHWEST HANDLING Brief Description of, Project: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A TWO STORY, 21,500 SQUAREIFOOT OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.42 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross) : 21,500 sQ. FT. DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : 32% IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : x 2) Direc /Indirect Air Quality: x 3) Water & Water Cpuses:x 4) Plant Life: I x 5) Animal Life: x 6) Noise:x 7) Light & Glare: I ;x 8) Land Use; North:L'WAREHousE & OFFICE USE East: WAREHOUSING South UNDEVELOPED West: WAREHOUSING Land use Conflicts : COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING View Obstruction: I NONE ANTICIPATED 9) Natural Resources x 10) Risk of Upset:x 11) Populalltion/Employment:x 12) Numbelf of Dwellings : 1 BLDG. 13) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 962 ADT Traffic Impacts:I i GRADY WAY & POWELL AVENUE SW, SW 7th ST & HARDIE A. E 14) Public Services: ! x 15) Energy: x 16) Utilities: x 17) Human Health: 1x 18) Aesthetics: x 19) Recreltian: x 20) Archelogy/Histry: x Signatures: I i Ronald G. Nelson I Michael Parness Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor Kt/ JULY :;.' :PUBLISHED: hd C. h 'APPEAL DATE: JULY Public Works Director r/.• : s 4.. 0 -7-5- 6ey, f NORTH WEST f-,- = • HANDLING SYSTEMS, INC. 1228-B ANDOVER PARK EAST • P.O. BOX 88339 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 (206) 575-0814 t ;; :,,July 9, 1984 jj j 1` CITY oo P:,c FOE1} y CFbJJJJUL1i1984 'City of Renton 1' .. _ .. . Building Department 200 Mill Ave. S. I3u9LoiN,;U%. oI;!INr3 DE':'T. Renton, Wa 98055 Subject: ,North West Handling Systems Building 701 SW Seneca Attn: Roger Blaylock 7-= _.. -- -T - - Gentlemen: • We, are enclosing a copy of the short plat and title 1 LL- report on subject property 'for your records. Preliminary erawings have been submitted for permit by-,Thomas ,Sconzo & Associates. Very Truly Yours, West...„ 1„ Handling S stems, Inc. fEDo d G. Thomas, President i I DGT:nrn CC: Sconzo File I I CONVEYOR • LOADING DOCK EQUIPMENT • LIFT TRUCKS • STORAGE RACKS • RAIL CAR MOVE S ENERGY-SAVING'PRODUCTS • INDUSTRIAL & COLD STORAGE DOORS I I I y y _ $y yygq y i VPJy Wy x, 1i S l REPORT FOR TRUSTEE'S SALE i 1 REPORT FOR LITIGATION 4•): iN CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COM0.PANY a corporation of Missouri, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration paid for this A Report, the number, liabilttly !amount and effective date of which are shown herein, hereby GUARANTEES the parties herein, called the INSURED, against loss not exceeding such liability e amount which the Insured shall,sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurance which the ii Company hereby gives that, according to the public records, on the effective date: re 1. 1. Title to the herein described,land was vested in the vestee named, subject to the matters shown as Exceptions herein, which Exceptions are not necessarily shown in the order of their priority; In Witness W ereof CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this Report to be1 IA signed and se led as of the effective date, the Report to become valid when countersigned by an ld authorized signatory.I) 4, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: Issued by: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANIYI 1100 Olive Ray Suite 1400 0.4,0. Seattle,WA 98101 206) 628-5666 President. ATTEST: NSU Secretary. Af:;"...:gr-•"*"4" 416 4-/ 4ea ourf'., iz. N, Authorized Signatory t 1 1 SCHEDULE A Report Number l Liability Fee 72691 . 1 ,000 .00 200 .00 Tax 15 .80 Total Premium $215 .80 Effective Date: May 1 , 1984 at 8:00 a.m. The Estate or Interest in the Land Hereinafter Described orReferredtoCoveredbythisReportis: A FEE Title to said estate' or interest at the date hereof is vested in: CCC REALTY, INIC'. , a Delaware corporation. The land referred to in this Report is situated in the State of Washington, County of1King, and is described as follows: Lot 4, EXCEPT the north 456.70 feet thereof, Earlington Industrial Par!k! No. 1 , according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 83 of- Plats, page 10, in King County, Washington, as amended by affidavit recorded July 1 , 1968 under RecordingNumber 6370461 . i THIS REPORT IS SUBJECT TO SCHEDULE B, EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE AND CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS WHICH ARE ATTACHED, AND SAID REPORT .IS EFFECTIVE ONLY WHEN SAID SCHEDULE B, EXCL JSIONS FROM1COVERAGE AND CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS ARE ATTACHED. 1 I The following matte'. ;'are expressly excepted f] the coverage of this Report: 1 .Righs or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records i 2 .Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes , and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspectionjof the premises . 3. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. 4 . Any lien, or right to a lien, for services , labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records 6 .Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 7 . a) Unpatentedimining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights , claims or title to water. 8 .GENERAL TAXES, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND SPECIAL LEVIES. 9. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ( $ 1 ,000 .00) . • 10 . IF THE PARTIES DESIRE A HIGHER LIABILITY LIMIT, THE COMPANY HAS AVAILABLE A REPORT FOR TRUSTEE .SALE OR A REPORT FOR LITIGATION: CONTACT YOUR TITLE OFFICER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. I ' 11 . THIS REPORT ISjNOT TO BE USED AS A BASIS FOR CLOSING ANY TRANSACTION AFFECTING TITLE TO SAID PROPERTY. IT IS RESTRICTED TO USE •OF THE ADDRESSEE FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING NECESSARY PARTIES DEFENDANT IN AN ACTION CONCERNING MATTERS TO BE DISCLOSED AT A LATER DATE. continued) SCHEDULE B 72691 Page 2 1 12. RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN THE DEDICATION OF THE PLAT AS FOLLOWS: Saving and reselrving unto the Pacific Coast R.R. Co. , its successors and assigns, the continued right to construct, . reconstruct, maintain and operate existing railway tracks together with all signal and communication and. railway appLrtenancesand facilities on, over and across the property hereinlabove platted. The rights herein reserved shall be exercised in a manner which will not unreasonably interfere with the use of said streets and avenues for street, utility and related purposes. 13. Unrecorded leasholds, if any; rights of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon said property and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. END OF SCHEDULE B 1 1 BK/ck1 D-1850 cc: , Harstad Surveying 1643 Strander Blvd. Seattle, WA 981188 1 This sketch is not_ b, n . upon a survey of the pi ._ _rty described in 1. Order No. F Chicago Title Insurance Dmpany. It is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in Iodating the said premises. It does not purport to show all roads or easements. The company assumes no ''liability for inaccuracies therein. O 15' 0 b"E 0.18 In W I 1 -----1058.32 ---- a See Detail 588 15' 00 E 89' Id la" E i - 26a 57 749.4-6 g •';5 0'49'42'W 80.00 it g 13 18 S6654 383.24 1 ST. S 99' l0 18"E I Z.27E12.23d 1 see•13•oa' 4 19s e•1O' le"E th. 1a0.01 r7 - 317.51 317.51 48 00-I' 40 40 So so 2ei6s• 13 30 30 0----2SG 11 I128731I Ifi I 2 I I 1- > 0 4RI I• I,•• I 3I n ny 1 O 6 I N 2 VH o z 0t I W I 10- a I.101.3J'IS'W 0.lol4d 33 I- R. 1.30 i 0.47.50 I `>:` LT:Ott; y' LT•B5a34i iI r r gl 31T.51 ! 030 f 317.31ic;1"7 r Q I 72C.o1 W el I 'o "r.i CC 5 i;' Q r_ I A I a. I _N 4040 I I I I 0 i. I ! 7 1 vi I: 1 1rItI-11 0 64F1 1823, l 26 Q 33 N 11265.5e265. , -o E O RAMGL UMi 2 I" T a1 - _ 51 541'1e.. 1 1Qt• . 2.641 1e=' 3 I 5 2 1`. W 1,10056 Q gI51•4dr• 2 4.1''N r.: ' / I'S {8 5 1 6 1 S•w 24 197TI 3T. r laoo1 3ur' 317.31—f EARLINGTON INDUSTRIAL. PARK NO. I sacs I 2 I 5 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEN MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY RENT ON- 072 - 84 ON I UN 2 21984 APPLICATION NO(S) ; SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) pCyOF1) MFh, 1 1)FPr PROPONENT ; DON THOMAS PROJECT TITLE ;NORTHWEST HANDLING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT;APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A TWO STORy, 21,500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION ; LOCAIIED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. T0 ; 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPART ENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/3/84 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFjIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION F-1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & R 'CREATION DEPARTMENT F-1 BUILDING $ ZONING DEPARTMENT l ' POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON JULY 2„1984 I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED 4(/ 1/' ail ei)1,.... 1(jAeloZeoCe Zee)//kZ7A5tp.At;: jet:frt,'.174-11-4077/ 2 DATE : c7 g SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/ 982 nrm 182 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP4 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC F - 072 - 84 APPLICATION NO S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) PROPONENT : DON THOMAS PROJECT TITLE : NORTHWEST, HANDLING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A TWO STORY, 21,500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. TO : I n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/3/84 n ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ti n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT I ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT 11POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS : I I CdIMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN, WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JULY 2, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIS.ION : 7L-72 n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED gee--Scr TO .G/GO i(( PE.P/N/ETE2 l os S /-/O%" 5-/-7`o 7&-* Ga,Co v,,oE.CD 4 7,0/a/r oxj G -OJT- G /,c) L/N_ L.,v/,?/} Svdr 2) e e/6 5i ,d 2 De/v,S/T// Lc)/ _e. ' QG//.eE 50 %7) A.4 7 6/1'14.2,S i6/-1 1`7/Z,47-0c, 4 6‘ c)/r /- 3 c C T cif ,5v/L,o/aL G 7-6) - i&. E..47 v,() G.4,cJ A-0 .e I 7 DATE : 7 7 — SIGNAT E D R TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE I REVPSSION 5/ 982 Form 1R2 i RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPI MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 072 - 84 I APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) PROPONENT ; DON THOMAS PROJECT TITLE : I NORTHWEST HANDLING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A TWO STORE', 21,500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION ;LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. 1 I 1 TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/3/84 1] ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1 n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT I KBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUG1GESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN1 WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMEN BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON, JULY 2, 1984 gREVIEWINGDEPARTMENT/DIVIISION : C_:-J) C n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED 1 cici.) A i '7J-,g dE) 4)D 1 71-D 0 Ac k t)—( T a,9cJ Q5./ 1 C /%U 6 D 2/d7 2" Q 1.. ---- ---,6 /-74:e,g9-6-------DATE :2 SIGNATURE OF ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 REVISION 5/1982 1 Form 182 RENT , BUILDING & ZONING DEPI 'MENT DE ELOPME'NT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EcfF — 072 - §4 APPLICATION NOES) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) PROPONENT ;DON THOMAS I PROJECT TITLE : NORTHWEST HANDLING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A WO STORY, 21,500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION .: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/p/84 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT I ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I ( POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JULY 2, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED 2 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS SNOT APPROVED Ne v--G I I l( 3; ,G 1j/d C_ ,1 . d 5 S Ci!Y/XA."-eNe7L) As/F-7 DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982N o Fnrm 1 fi2 1 RENT* 1 BUILDING & ZONING DEP.MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 072 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) I PROPONENT : DON THOMAS PROJECT TITLE : NORTHWEST (HANDLING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A TWO I STORY, 21,500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION ; LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/ /84 1 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION 1 ( TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREV NTION BUREAU l ( PARKS : & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING ZONING DEPARTMENT 1POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Li OTHERS : I 1 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMEN` BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JULY 2, 684 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED P ems- lie c;, (-t's 4 e - 6wi--,- /ec--4 Jr;; 1C'e-4---; Se1---, 4, 7 - s1 h tJ1kPIt.-7 1 5---.e,e, /LA, k 1.--,--2 • C2- N.-1e r" ch,71-6_YesiA si.,„i.-- 1 1 4,__, 1'" DATE ; C)- 2 /2 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOR ED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 It',-v,., 1 R jSite Plan Assessment Northwest Handling SA-075-84 Don Thomas 1 1 Two (2) story, 21 ,000 sq,i ft. of office.& warehouse building warehouse 18,5001sq. ft. office 1 ,500 1st floor footage office 1 ,5002nd floor footage Estimated Trip Ends 18,500 1 ,000 x 5.01 = 92.68, 1 ,500 6.92x 1 ,000 x 12.3 130' Total Trips Ends 46% of trip use Grady & Powell 38% of trip use SW 7th St. & Hardie 15.4% of trip use Grady, & Lind (No assessment here) Assessment value per latecomer's agreement with Wash. Technical Center Grady Way & Powell Ave. traffic signal) 46% x 130 = 59.8 trills'' Vi59.8 x $3.69 = $220.68 CI I urr Allir SW 71th St. & Hardie Ave!. SW traffic signal ) s . 38% x 130 = 49.4 49.4 x $2.18 = $107.691 Total Assessment 220.68 + 107.69 = $328.37 3 1.a 1 1 sEMkch RENTS 1 BUILDING & ZONING DEP*IMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 072 84 APPLICATION NO( ) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) THOMASPROPONENT : DONI HANDLINGNORTHWESTPROJECTTITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A TWO STORY, 21,500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/3/84 El ENGINEERING DIVISION I ( TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : SOUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & R CREATION DEPARTMENT 1 1BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED I WRITING', PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JULY 2, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVS ION ; 74' ///1y l APPROVED R/APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVE UTILITY APPROVAL SIIJECT TO I 6/29f84 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - WATER Avp LATE COMERS AGREEMENT SEXIER 1z SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT LUNGE WATER yE5 0.44APrx 666 4/31= f-4, I SYSTEM IEVELIPMEWT CHARGE ;• SEWER ES ep.Gi fS'Q'.FTx 6 6P4/34e-- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • WATER Ap 7t 93/• _z- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • SEWER Ai APP!OVEO WATER PLAN 'GALLS #-y I• _ tPAPPROVEDSEWERPLAN ,c5 it2,% o10-114t APPROVED FIRE NYIAANT LOCATIONS BY--FIRE_DEPT. y.g-S FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS ' l M4:- . DATE : /-? /S4 SIGNATURE OF DIRE-' TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE i REVISION 5/ • Fnrm 1R7 i RENT 'BUILDING & ZONING DEP•MENT DEV LOPMEIIIT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 1 1 ECF - 072 - 84 AP LIGATION NOT : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) PROPONENT ;DON THOMAS PROJECT TITLE : NORTHWEST HANDLING I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A TWO I STORY, 21,500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION : ;LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. 1 TO : I II PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/3/84 0 ENGINEERING DIVIISION 1 n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE ; 1 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1 I-1 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING 8 ZONING DEPARTMENT 54POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5; 00 P .M, ON JULY 2, 11984 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISiION ; GG K-APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1 NOT APPROVED I W ! DATE : 7'8 51 SIGNATy E OF (?RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENT" 1 BUILDING & ZONING DEP•MENT 40 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 072 - 84 AP LICATION NO( ) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) I PROPONENT : DON THOMAS 1 PROJECT TITLE : NORTHWEST HANDLING BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A TWO STORE', 21,500 SQUARE FOOT OFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. 1 LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. 1 TO : n l IPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/S/84 Di ENGINEERING DIVISION I ( TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU IPJFPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I ( POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TiOTHERS : 1 COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON JULY 2, i984 I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIION : r-/--- APPROVED I I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED C n 0.____ DATE ; SIGATUREOF DIRECTOR OR A ORIZ D REPRES NTATIVE r REVISION 5(1982 I I r OF R4.4, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTr „ RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR NULL 0 a MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 co' 0, 9 P gTFD SEPT -1 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR August 3, 1984 Don Thomas 1228 B Andover Park East Seattle, WA 98188 Re: Site Approval Application for a Warehouse/Office Building; Located at the 800 Block iof Seneca Avenue S.W., File SA-075-84 Dear Mr. Thomas: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on June 19, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner h'as been scheduled for August 14, 1984. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, t @_,. Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:cI 1031Z i I I I OF RA,A di ~-BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT c) C$ 4 z RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 i '9,o Pam'0947, SEP1- BARBARA Y. SHINPOCI-f MAYOR August 3, 1984 Thomas A. Sconzo 919 124th Avenue N.E., Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98005 Re: Site Approval Application for a Warehouse/Office Building; Located at the 800 Block of Seneca Avenue S.W., File SA-075-84 Dear Mr. Thomas: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on June 19, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has, been scheduled for August 14, 1984. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant ,or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:cl I 1031Z-2 I i OF R4, or OMzr!L o n 09q 0. 5)„ SEPSE0e City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a pu. , : tic HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON AUGUST 74, ig84 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. : CONCERNING: FILE SA-075-84 flREZONE From To I (: SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERIT To x SITE APPROVAL I SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCAIEI) ALONG THE 'EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL . DECLARATION SIGNIFICANT 4 NON-SIGNIFICANT! FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING &ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION OF R et BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT u. RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 p9 fit' I CD MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 P 94 7- 0 SEPTt BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR June 29, 1984 Mr. Thomas Sconzo 919 - 124th Avenue N.E., Suite 101 Bellevue, Wa 98005 RE: Site Approval Application, SA-075-84; Property Located on the East Side of Seneca Avenue S.W.lat Approximatly the 800 Block. Dear Mr. Sco zo: The Zoning Division staff recently discovered a problem while reviewing the site approva application for Don Thomas.' We cannot find a record of the short plat which would hav divided Block 4 of the Earlin'gton Industrial Park No. 1 Plat into two lots. The City cannot allow a project to develop on a non-legal lot. Therefore, we are withholding the, application from further processing until we receive proof that the property was short platted. Proof may be provided by submitting a copy of the deed. In addition, a copy of the short plat as recorded by King County at the Department of Records and Elections may also be provided to the Department. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, telRogerJ. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMS:cl 0970Z l 0451N FINAL'DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): j SA-075-84 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-072-84 Description of Proposal:Application for site plan approval to allow a two-story, 21,500 square foot office and warehouse building. Proponent: Don Thomas Location of Proposal: j Located along the east side of Seneca Avenue S.W. at the 800 block. Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by, the ERC on July 3, 1984, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Michael Parness, Richard Houghton, Gene Williams, Roger Blaylock, Jerry Lind, and Ronald Nelson Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-072-84 are the following 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Dennis A. Sconzo, dated June 19, 1984. 2. Applica ions: Site Plan!Approval (SA-075-84). 3. Recommendationsendations for 1,a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, .Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities Engineering Division! Policy Development Department, Parks and Recreation Department, and the Police Department. 4. Recommendation for more information: Fire Prevention Bureau. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject proposal will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties. INFORMATION: 1. Second access is to be provided to the parking area south of the building from the cul-de-sac. 2. Per a late corner's agreement (Washington Technical Center), assessment for traffic signal installations at S.W. Grady Way and Powell Avenue S.W., and S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. shall be $220.68 and $107.69 respectively, for a total of $328.37. This amount shall be due at the time the building permit is issued. SIGNATURES: d/ f Ronald G. Nelson is ael P ess Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor chard C. Houg ton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: July 9, 1984 ! APPEAL DATE: July 23, 1984 0 A ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 072 _ 84 APPLICATION NO(s) : STTR PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) PROPONENT: DON THOMAS PROJECT TITLE: NORTHWEST HANDLING Brief Description of Project: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A TWO STORY, 21,500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF .SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.42 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross ) : 21,500 SQ. FT. DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : 32% IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO, 1) Topographic Changes : x 2) Direct/Indirect 'Air Quality: x 3) Water & Water Courses :x 4) Plant Life: x 5) Animal Life: x 6) Noise: x. 7) Light & Glare:x I 8) Land Use; North: WAREHOUSE & OFFICE USE East : ; WAREHOUSING South: UNDEVELOPED West : ; WAREHOUSING Land Use Conflicts : COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING View Obstruction: NONE ANTICIPATED 9) Natural Resources :x 10) Risk of Upset : , x 11) Population/Employment :x 12) Number of Dwellings : 1 BLDG. 13) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 962 ADT Traffic Impacts : GRADY WAY & POWELL AVENUE SW, SW 7th ST & HARDIE AVE 14) Public Services : x 15) Energy: x 16) Utilities : x 17) Human Health: x 18) Aesthetics: x 19) Recreation: x 20) Archeology/History: x Signatures: I Ronald G. Nelson Michael Parness Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant 4, to the Mayor k‘iciPUBLISHED: JULY 9, 1984 chard Ce Houghn APPEAL DATE: JULY 23, 1984 Public Works Director 1 garict ENVIRID NMENTAL r EcLARA ,: APPLICATION NO. SA-075-84, ECF-072-84 PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL-TII I OW A TWO STORY 21,500 SQ, FT, OFFICE BLDG. & WARFHOUSF RIDG. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE *OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DO ES 114DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT 'ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT SE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH; THE RENTON HEARING ; EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., JULY 23, 1984 FOR ' FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2S50 DID NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITI4OLT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON. WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects: DR. FRANK BROZOVICH (ECF-066-084). Application for substantial shoreline development permit for the construction of a 3.176 square foot office building in the vicinity of the Cedar River file SM-116-84; located at the southwest corner of Wells Avenue South and South Riverside Drive. i DON THOMAS (ECF-072-84). Application for • site plan approval to allow a two-story 21.500 square foot office and warehouse building. file SA-075-84, located along the east side of Seneca Avenue S.W. at the 800 block. Further inforrr}ation regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department. Municipal Building. Renton. Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by July 23, 1984. Published: July 9. 1984 A Date circulated : JUNE 22, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2, 1984 EMI9UI98ONHE\TAL CHECKLIST REVIEww SHEET ECF - 072 84 IAPPLICATIONNo (s ) . SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) I i PROPONENT : DON THOMAS PROJECT Ti TLE : NORTHWEST HANDLING Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A TWO STORY. 21 500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. SITE AREA : 1.42 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 21,500 SQ. FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 32 IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO han1 ) Topographic cges : r// 2 ) Direct/Indirect 'air quality : r/ 3 ) WateT & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : ; 6 ) Noise 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : L 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : c--- 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip , ends ( ITE ) : 64.s. L,l1 e57,-2 traffic impacts • J o T- H u Tln,-a lva-': u` i a i to T c 14 ) Public services : 6-"' =`;/67e 15 ) Energy : 16 ) lutil ties : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aest etics : 1 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : h`sec, 1411,if Y'" Tit a f_r),:, p 5 w G°v a nl GJa.2 P.pe-)cl/ e 6-.4v ro i 1. 3 2. I Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information 2 Reviewed by :: 2D ''-i t 1 e : I 70 ,c Date : FORM: ERC-016 Date circulated : JUKE 22, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2, 1984 EIWIVIRD6RE\ITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 072 - 84 C!1 APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) I UOF REN]'0 v 2 21984 PROPONENT : DON THOMAS MENr OFpT PROJECT TITLE : NORTHWEST HANDLING Brief Description o f ; Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO AL OW A TWO STORY. 21.500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION : ._0 ATE I .ON!THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. SITE .AREA : 1.42 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 21,500 SQ. FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAthE (%) : 32 I IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) : Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : I 8 ) Land Use ; nortH qq y p CaL/ u=,, yy, C ©t iee. 7east : 1 We--vuahnvsirtq south Optrieval west : j Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) ;Natural resources : de„--71 10 ) Risk of upset : ; 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITEI) : F‘ , ,Q7y5 . Jr j- k< 3' 7—G li traffic impact S"{ , "a a-rt .e- aJ Onat) 7 i 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : I 18 ) - Aesthetics : 19 ) 'Recreation : 20 ) ,Archeology/history : COMMENTS : 1 Recommendation : DNSIi DOS More .Information_ I i Reviewed by : Title : Date : 7cZ f FORM: ERC-06 AO CYJG)I e121 JGs 1 Date circulated : JUNE122, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET I ECF - 072 _ 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) I PROPONENT : DON THOMASI I; PROJECT T T L E : NORTHWEST HANDLING Brief Des r i p t i o n of !Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLIW A TWO' STORY. 21.500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION : LOCATED ON HE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. I SITE AREA : 1.42 ACRES I BUILDING AREA (gross) 21,500 SQ. FT. 1 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (96) : 32 7 1 IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE j INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Diregt/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Wate I .& water courses : i/ 4 ) Plan life : 5 ) Animal life :t/ 6 ) Nois9 : 1 7 ) Ligh & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : ;, east : 1 south : west : I Land use conflicts : View obstruction ':. I 9 ) NaturalTresources : v/ 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Numb r of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 1 traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : ! 15 ) Energy : 1 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : j 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 1.// i 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Pro vlA.c— 7' W A--` ire-T —a d4.-7 o-- il S;f zshy' 1 Recommendation : DNSII DOS More Information FORM: ERC-0 ' i I Ikt oS Date circulated : JUNE 22, 1984 Comments due : UUL2, 1984" 'gI ENVIIR®NHE\ITL L CHECKLIST REVIEEV SHEET E C F - 072 _ 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) VIA a 2 1J84 PROPONENT : DON THOMAS PROJECT TITLE : NORTHWEST HANDLING Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A TWO STOP. 21,500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION : LOCATED .OIN THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. SITE AREA : 1.42 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 21,500 SQ. FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 32 % IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : I I 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south :I i west : I Land use conflicts : Viewlobstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risklof upset : I 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Numbr of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE )I : traffic impact : 14 ) Public services, : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : I 19 ) Recrelation : 20 ) Archel,ology/histlory : COMMENTS : 5/z-z) /(.. .--e:)iP.tiRT/off Oa.) n0,4 7v2_ yr GJA Dvsi.t G CUt/OOc/C 47e 5S Sl 2 /W 3 /7/e.o l7 iA/CEi1 5odr v o :a!// ,''9 #70.<7 GUL— L2e-S,,G_ Recommendation : DNSII DOS More Information Reviewed 4 Title . ,?:4/4 Date : ate` ,99/ FORM: ERC-OE UTILIYlcS Date circulated : JUNE 22, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2, 1984 ENVI9d®HMIEMITAL CHECKLIST REVIE,; SHEET ECF = 072 _ 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) PROPONENT : DON THONIA PROJECT TITLE : NORTHWEST HANDLING Brief Description of ;Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A TWO STORY. 21 500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION : LOCATED .O THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. SITE AREA : 1.42 ACRES i BUILDING AREA (gross ) 21,500 SQ. FT. 1 DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 32 7 IMPACT RElIVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE j INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect fair quality : 3 ) 'Wate & water lo;urses : V/ 4) Plant' life : 5 ) Animi 1llife : 1/ 6 ) Noise : I/ 7 ) Light & glare : j 1/ 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south :! west : Land use conflicts : View obstructionl: I9) Natural resources : r 10 ) Risk of upset : I 1 11 ) Population/Employment : 1/ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : , 15 ) Energy : t 16 ) Utilities : I 17 ) Human health : 1/ 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNS I DOS More Information rg-Reviewed by :J SS'J Title : ///lJT/.UT(' ,,LL/I/6/it/,&cE Date : 6 Z7 /gy FORM: ERC-06 bilk-CD INDGa Date circulated : JUNE 22, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF _ 072 _ 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) PROPONENT : DON THOMAS PROJECT TITLE : NORTHWEST HANDLING Brief Description of 'Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A TWO STORY. 21.500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION : LOCATED ON 1THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S .W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. SITE AREA : 1,42 ACRES !BUILDING AREA (gross ) 21,500 SQ. FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 32 IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Diret/Indireci !air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) 'Anim1 life : 6 ) Nois : d( 7 ) Light & glare : j 8 ) Land Use ; north east : I south :, west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : A 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) traffic impacts : :r 14 ) Public services: ] 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : D'" DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : Jy Title : Date : 6- 2 , FORM: ERC-06 1 C.0 Date circulated : JUNE 22, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW! SHEET ECF = 072 _ 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) PROPONENT : DON THOMAS PROJECT TITLE : NORTHWEST HANDLING Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO AL IOW A TWO STORY. 21 500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION : LOCATED .0'N THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. SITE !AREA : 1.42 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross) 21,500 SQ. FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (46) : 32 % IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direlt/Indirectiair quality : 3 ) ,Water & water c ourses : 4 ) ;Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) 'Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : '' 8 ) ;Land Use ; north : east south : west : j Land use conflfifi' cts : View obstructi6n : 9 ) Natural resources : o 10 ) 'Risk of upset : ,, 11 ) ;Popu ation/Empo'yment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traf is impacts : 14 ) Publ c services :; 15 ) 'Ener y : 16 ) :Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) iAest etics : 19 ) Recr ation :I 20 ) ;Archology/history : COMMENTS : 1 1 / Recommendation : 1.."' DOS More Information tdiee by : a9G Title : 41 e 7-5' g,, FORM: ERC-06 i I PAR- . 4 E• Date circ lated : JUNE 22, 1984 Comments due : JULY 2, 1984 EINIVIR,®MIEIIdITAL CHECKLIST REVIEt,,: SHEET E C F _ 072. _ 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-075-84) PROPONENT : DON THOMAS PROJECT TIITLE : NORTHWEST HANDLING Brief D e sIis r i p t i o n o f Project : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW A TWO STORY. 21.500 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE AND WHAREHOUSE BUILDING. LOCATION :, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SENECA AVENUE S.W. AT THE 800 BLOCK. SITE AREA : 1.42 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 21,500 SQ. FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 32 7 IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indireclt air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animial life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare :, 8 ) Land Use ; nortjh : east: south : west : I Land use conflicts : Vied obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset :' 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : I I traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : , 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS ;: I I iI i I \ Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information i \ Reviewed by : ' ` i—dTitle : Date : 4! y FORM: ERCr06 IJ fY o CY OF RENTO,' FILE NO(S): 3,4-676---84 I Ez © . BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT CF'v7a-$9. II N oT MASTER APPLICATiON NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items relatedlto your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT F--„--TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME I FEES Don Thomasl DDRESS I. A REZONE*(FROM TO 1228B Andover Park East 0 SPECIAL PEST* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* Sedttl e. WA 98188 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE i SITE PLAN APPROVAL 307 5 75-0 8 14 0 GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT No. of Cubic Yards: RANCE CONTACT PERSON From Section: Justification Required NAME I a ADDRESS Thomas A. Sconzo, Architect SUBDIVISIONS: 919-124th Avenue NE Suite 101 Q SHORT PLAT CITY I ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Bellevue, WA 98005 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 455-3203 U WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: See Applicant I ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 0 PRELIMINARY CITY I ZIP 0 FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE I Residential ED Indu trial EDCommercial Q Mixe LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS Not Ass i.gneld / goo Svr'=c-R- 660 ED TENTATIVE ED EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY Vacant dLandIMP. FINAL l PROPOSED USE I I PARK NAME: Warehouse/Office Building NUMBER OF SPACES: I r ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 94 SQ. FT! r ACRES A 1,643 TOTAL FEES 4011L. At-.I cnT-; C;= a<,:i.-', °"e6s-T-A^FF USE ONLY -ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING C. DA E[- , P ( f 3 ?ci "l APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: -SE e M. JwCY Fn APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: JUN 19 1984 Accepted i Incomplete Notification Sent__ On ) • By: E',IJILi co.#/ I Initials) DAT E ROUTED 1 ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: 7 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: v C 2.2 - t 9 ED Accepted ' QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: I 0 Building D sign Eng. al Fire JI Parks 521 Police ii Policy Dev. 121 Traffic Eng. Utilities 1 I II ; REVISION 5/198, 2 1 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Lot 4, except Nortn 456.70 feet thereof, Earlington Industrial Park No. 1 according to the plat thereof in Volume _83 of plats , page 10, in King County, Washington, as amended by affidavit recorded July 1, 1968 iinriar Rccnrdi ng Number 6370461 . AFFIDAVIT I, Do DJ 7 L Q 6 Ti--lo being duly sworn, declare that I am Ei authorized representative to act for.the property owner,Mowner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS lg DAY OF C 19(4 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT 36.ZO. e A rize.K Name of Notary Public),Signature of Owner) 7 ?ja.(,va.6 '. l0 1228B Andover Park_ E.ast Address) Address) Seattle, WA 98188 City) State) (Zip) 575-0814 Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application'Procedure." Fo,;m #174 411 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON LAMENT Y :; ENVIRO AL CHECKLIST FORM r:c I i r.T'' Y° 'm JUN 191984 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY i.'•!• diN' %ZON1U¢:, Application No :S /9 it Environmental Checkl i st No. I EC.F_ 0 7a-R'/ PROPOSED, dated FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration 'of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: s i I Introduction Tlhe State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply; to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may no't .occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be' involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in 'the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question' does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent I Don: Thomas 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: c/o Thomas A. Sconzo, Architect 919. 11- 124th Avenue NE, Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98005 455-3203 3. Date checklist submitted June 19, 1984 4. Agency requiring checklist Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: N/A 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, !general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Construction of a..warehous:e/offi.ce building consisting of approximately 18,500 sf of warehouse and 3,000 sf of office (1,500 sf each floor) . Construction to be concrete tilt-up and the building will have a clear height of 24'-0". I I I I 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental settinglof the proposal ) : Site if on the east side of Seneca AvenueSW, south of it's intersection with SW 7th Street. I 8. Estimated dateifor completion of the proposal : December 1984. 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local--including rezones) : Site Plan Review Building Permit 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of' any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your. proposal ? If yes , explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none' has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations 'of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstablelearth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO 1 b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- coveringlof the soil? X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X. I ES MAYBE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of .any unique geologic or physical features? X. YES MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X YES MAYBE NO 1 f) Changes din deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: ! Construction of the building will require f' ise grUgg 9d footing excavation. Disruption, compaction, and overcovering will occur throughout normal construction activities. 1 3- 2) Air. Will the prIoposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES M YBE tV c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? I X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Some temporary increases in airborne dust may occur during construction. Objectionable odors maybe encountered with paving and/or I roof surfacing during construction. 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and 'amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? xx YES MAYBE Nd( d) Change in the, amount of surface water in any water body? X YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface wateriquality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of .the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X_ YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception olf an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Dieterioration din ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the, amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Upon development much of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. A new storm water retention system will be developed, if required, to handle the water runoff from this site. 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)?x YES MAYBE NO 1 b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered specifies of flora? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of; new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to; the normal replenishment of existing spiecies? YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X 1 YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Upon development, the existing vegetation will be removed. The new development will include landscaping as part of the overall site I,design. a 1 1 4- i 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species; of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction oif the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result iin a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioratilon to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Construction noise levels will be intermittently high. I I 7) Light and Glare l Will the proposal produce new light or glare?YES M YBE NO Explanation: The development would contribute to more light and glare in the area from windows and parking lot and safety lighting. 8) Land Use. Will! the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) NaturalResourc!es. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase inn the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion lof any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES r MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X YES M YBE NO Explanation: 4111 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? IL YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Ciirculation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand Xfornewparkling? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? XX YES MAYBE Nd( d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NO Expllanation: Additional vehicular traffice will be present during con- struction and after completion of the development. New, on-site parking wily be provided. II 14) Public Services. ' Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any. of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other' recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? Xg YES MAYBE N"0 Fire and protect ion requirements would be minimallyExpination: policeq affected i.n terms of increased inspections or responses to calls. 15) Energy. Will the :proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems•, or alterations to the following utilities : a) 1Power or natural gas?X YES MAYBE NO b) lCommunication;s systems? X. YES MAYBE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 410 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage?X YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: I The development :would require usuage of all the above utilities , all of which are readily available to the site. 17) Human Health. ; Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to Public view? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: j 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 1 20) Archeological,/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structulre, object or building? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 1 III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: signed) 4z0 name printed THOMAS A. SCONZO City of Renton az-4kt- Building & Zoning Department May, 1983 919=124th AVE. N.E./BELLEVUE, WA 98005/206/455-3203 Form N 176 I 40 1_11 ,111....L _LpTITIILsti, IIII ! gi,IA- -------- cnry....) 1ed OWLUNT.0i 71V.,L We.1.1:01%---'- r 32cm1 s-rte2RA,,,P AREA\ F ,...eirwer--1,....41\1. ioiiSP.-01 4L1Z11:-o'..w. 7-01H.-r.5fl.Tr.icaccdt i i an • i 2..01 te-c0 W7 ri-4r_•. ...„:„..,,,r.d v.r.:4./ r r--co-ti ds tr irnA4-1. i : • 11MAM\.,,,,.. I A I 21.1A K t.-1-1 DiMTIVIenC5, !11 4K _ I V - IF4I- 1 i i . 1 Eta '- i 38.1 'T= . I , 7 5 I -- • St' .i .6' •-- / -\ I1 1 s:1 E. . s•-•---_. j- \ ,I!,1 771L2Nti\ LzE arp41-alaic 11, izetwrz16.1v'tr:.113194_,•*\ _ , •-• _tb;41- gail647.ci._ Ka. R\IM.S'SCRRC• ,,,,• 7.___, ! I 16-.': I id.d- .....„ Zr.411,10.4- 115141111 i so fr.;. rm, , --:-_,, dr .,' m. ELM l 'R .7 .......----I- --rcri-rrruNcT DAT A . - - -citrrT. rlAr_. .. s44., *e; 0%. H-IIIHRL.4. 2 0 .. ...'"7,-._______ bfltr-4.01--------- e •1 1. Mr A0F. (03.MI MOS. 111.443.• I WILLOW ROTPRINT 7.SALISCA/ISS 140.. 10.414 SUM 1110M2-10,04 PROVISO 1 I \,,,.=-71 '- -' ,....r..... 1A403001 10300 SS 10•0116 LOT MP 940 SO.17.• 1000 SO.47 1913•11131.WILL 1 SEGI. 3173..mr.a.. hr..... __,..........-!. _1.ANIMCArIMOI_Als.r.A._ 1 d ile4'4'1-/TOTAL 113074101 1 S. SEISM STAR SCOW 1 WILE 1.301 9. MOM 110. I t?' N. I 4. TOM SO.rr. 11300 SO.Al. 101.1.64 IMMO SP.TT,11.3 STALLS ...7''''.-4.1 - - - -- --,i. -1.._ ,i,t.. I IS 0 STALLS, . • TOTAL MO. - , 1/.3 STALLS - A: - t. MI131031 WA 1.4. 9'.n. to rusts non= 37 STALLSrTIO4.140 1 ti., -13111/001S . 77177 KO rcy-to _nitrLDI NeT-_0 N-0Z4WMT PKWA I-1D L IN14-1 614 1.44040:41E, -- _ r-r ri A..1_ IDE: c.rriol-1 LOT I.OW?OS=TN 404.70 KIT TIMM.0101.31011:0 111:10011.4 PARA g ?.. .... - 1110114AS A 5CONZOI--r E.-__ _--.7.7 L /-\ N a.,....10 TN FLIT UMW M39,310 IN NUM 03 Of RAM MAI 4/44SaLt- .10,1111M MAT.10131130illl.1.311113003114_4(113041T_102131100_3141•1940 WM 10/1131011G WWI GAY% lam ma saimula alk moinermam MO-114.15+ r ci c-.) J:-.) c) _ e (D _ ,C) T 4.4,, I i I I' '. '. I I - .1ii 1 T-F r r qHrJIIE LI17r_-CLCY/\rloN lfMINTED) P'iptILO tale-nu-ur atle tTe16 - I 1 you nuu_xAewhq i I' . .I• L I I I• 9.k ! fL5T LLLVATIoH - - -- i...onj x. PLASM \ ) HALL tAeIe CPAra....3.---\\. _ ftatICOSIII1 . CMUITWjir-44 6*711: 4a nwz +n* 4 Z IITX! CLLVnTIoN t TI-I [ Lt VAT ION rR-oro-CCD -DL11L.pINei 71OMe/A EOOt® Q h1 1a z6 ° I 1i 1 0i kflA3 i p a k v4 1 G• 0 1 I" ' T` TL fit_ 1 d g 4y v s ( I 2 a 5 . a I I 9 J J a 5 00b a 1 8 t T. I 1 1 , li, l 1 1 l 1I 1or ll 11 a. t gI1 o4VV e8y ( 1; 00.ry' Oe0 lIK, iii 1!' eee° l ' pl qp a Si 4 , ivK9e . erd\ . 2... MLAi. r. E j l ee.- z, Es: 7eT: xeepe Earr+ il. 1 . a , 6• saIt*, 1 0 apt n < I7fui LII i h t efgt, ieDz6Oai00IliQ0320DOM VI KO OiaG04Td OIMOOG= 0ob J 1 II1 r N. JL• 11 ? I a W 100^ Tr I id 1-k‘ri 11 11 \II JUN 19 1984 THOMAS A. SCONZO, A.I.A. 919- 124th AVE., N.E. BELLEVUE, WA. 98005 206 455-3203 EXTERIOR BUILDING COLORS: NORTHWEST HANDLING BUILDING TYPE AREA COLOR: LIGHT BIEGE 1 MAIN BODY COLOR TRUCK & H.M. DOORS TYPE AREA COLOR: GREEN FLASHING SIDE WALL 2 AREAS DOWN SPOUTS TRUCK & H.M. DOORS TRIM TYPE AREA COLOR: DARK BROWN 3 ALUM. WINDOW FRAMES TL fl i 7daaiEll'Va1 THOMAS A. SCONZO / ARCHITECT A.I.A. 919-124TH AVENUE N.E.#101 BELLEVUE,WA 98005 206-455-3203 DATE JOB NO. lit- p` ATTENTION TO: -tCT° -- C. l..-k7Co. §= ' RE: WE ARE•SENDING YOU II XAttached p .Under separate cover via the following items: Shop drawings Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications Copy of letter Change order COPIES DATE ORIG.NO. DESCRIPTION 3-04—sty f r-1 I Iur-t5 p x c'trfC 6v t 72,( I\ oc-Teo 4s F p'M& . sU u( TT -cam 6-18-S 4 t-o . 3o1 Tom sl-r NPRzevA-t. i`I' Fole THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution As requested 0 Returned for correction 0 Return corrected prints For review and comment 0 FOR BIDS DUE 19 _ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOT TO US REMARKS I I I COPY TO SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. i I i1NDING oF FILE FILE TITLE I f B40 I 7a,L I