Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA84-076BEGINNINU OF FILE FILE TITLE 1f07(oM c sp 11 .„F p; A''• J 4JS _.yft g ' I1 r i Z t ! T95 k S"T' t' .. t 7 , s °is y . r f I I t.y{[ j y i i e. , ,, s r may M' 1rw ! m+ r f t ..fir•: z, 1F -'t'k6 ii ;' z„t Applicant FRANK FISCHER File No. R-076-84 Project Name Owner) John J . Quintinskie Property Location 426 Burnett Avenue South HEARING EXAMINER: Date Decision: 8/17/84 Recommendation Approval with Restrictive Covenants RF. 57'RIC I-1 Vi Coy pNj ht-r S &:),-r.O()'NG fi'409660648 Req./Rec. Date Received Date Response Appeal - Date Received Council Approval - Date Ordinance on # 844 Date 9A.9 S. / Mylar to County for Recording Mylar Recording # Remarks: Covenants received 9/5/84 for filing. When filed , place on agenda for City Council . I iv 0 5.5" 2d 1 L i( STL( I Q 20, S U f 8- co Q I lifc V It-V f./ PUSr- PAAKINC I oT nlvfu/Ay A, /,/N . t • t flfT6F 4LI- b o P c c 4 l / J Tjr<GS' 1 J •t 14' P0.o Porto ; G A r . 9 C i ON SITE i r s o_ PAAI(INL I "f { 4 r n i T n , 7 f rl R,[i - i T c i rh !S' b r- Z- Vcs' a_ x S S. DA,...weiN COr IG - Ql OCC IA] b n " 1'I Ito' rr ey,„,,„ 4 2 ,; j l Sr<< 7 x z a 2 q 1 , V .57.---,,Le_s. I 13 A XW//I& i r- r-' ofi ./// H'' '' ---"-------- J C .' ''':court) 5-IN a t1FAr1IC a. z sir 1,1C I" OF J AID ;‘'', , ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT c.) t$ )4—- z x,. ';,,J RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9,0 co- ck091t -0 SEINE'. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR April 1, 1985 Thomas M. Blake 12727 Reston Avenue S. Seattle, WA 98178 Re: MI•. & Mrs. John Quintinskie (Fisher Rezone/R-076-84) Dear Mr. Blake: After considerable debate surrounding the situation of the Fisher Rezone and the present circumstances of your clients, Mr. & Mrs. John Qiuntinskie, it is our belief that the only appropriate means to resolving the situation is to rezone the site and modify the underlyirg restrictive convenants. As you are aware, the Building and Zoning Department makes a recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, who then makes a recommendation to the City Council concerning the rezone. Even though our recommendation generally carries substantial weight with the Hearing Examiner and ultimately the City Council, we are unable to guarantee that a rezone request would be successfull. In any se, we are prepared to recommend approval of a rezone request if the uses are limited to more transitional area activities, speficially uses such as general offices or personal services. It is our belief that the Comprehensive Plan and Goals and Policies do not support a general rezone to B-1 (Business Use) that would ultimately allow retail/commercial activities. In your setter of February' 13th, you stated that your clients would offer the property based upon our recommendation. I would believe that this has no value at all to any perspective purchaser that is aware of the due process system through the Hearing Examiner and City Council. Even if the rezone is granted, any redevelopment of the site or change in use would have to comply with other City codes relating to fire, building, or parking requirements. If I can tie of any further assistance, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerel,', As\9.QA'— s \-D UkNA,c , 6ek Roger J. Blaylo ik Zoning A dministrator RJB:1443Z:c1 OF R4, 2.1 ., BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z lea T o4. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 09 TFD SEP10.° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR DATE: January 14, 1985 TO: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney F ROM:,-'V Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJEC": Fischer Rezone Covenants, File R-076-84 The Fischer Rezone changed the zoning classification on a piece of property owned by Mr. John Quintinskie from R-3, Residential - Multiple Family to B-1, Business Use. The rezone was part of a real estate transaction between Mr. Frank Fischer and Mr. John Quintinskie. The rezone action was based on the intent to use the subject property for a non-retail commercial use, specifically a beauty shop. Covenants were ultimately filed as a requir3ment of rezone, limiting use of the property to only that of a beauty shop. In addition one of the conditions in the filed covenants states "no other uses may be permitted on the premises." Since then, the real estate transaction has fallen through and Mr. Qui itinskie called our office to see about modifying the covenants to allow more types of business uses on the site. We have advised the owner that he may file another rezone application. New covenants could then be placed on the subject property. We would like two questions addressed. Firs; the immediate question is whether the property' owner can legally continue to utilize the property as a single family residence when such use seems contrary to the stipulations in the covenants? Conditions No. 2 & 3 of the filed covenants state: 2. The interior shall be utilized for a beauty shop of not more than 1,500 square feet of interior space or as otherwise limited by parking requirements. 3 . No other uses may be permitted on the premises. The second question is whether covenants resulting from a new rezone application actually replaces the covenants required by the Fischer Rezone (file R-076-84)? We hay 3 talked to the owner's attorney explaining that we are sending these issues in a memo t3 you and that he should contact your of lice. Attached please find copies of the Hearing Examiner's report and the restrictive covenants for your review. If you have any questions, please contact me. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Public Notice RENTON LAND USE LARRY M. BROWN HEARING EXAMINER Application to rezone 0.72 acre of AT PUBLI RENTON,WASHINGTON HELD BY roe from G 1 to L 1, file P-077-84; Affidavit of Publicatio THE REN OANRI LAND NG IUSELLEHEARING located on the north and south sides of EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING S.W. Grady Way at the 1300 block, IN THE COUNCIL.CHAMBERS ON THE between Drivea Se Avenue S.W. and STATE ( F WASHINGTON SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RE- FRANK FISCHER COUNTY OF KING ss. NTON, AT 9:00 A.M.TT ON AUGUST 7, Application to rezone 0.14 acre of 1984, 9:00 A TO CONSIDER THE property from R-3 to B 1 to allow a future FOLLOWING PETITIONS: beauty shop to be located on the subject property, file R-076-84; located at 426 Burnett Avenue South. Cindy Strupp being first duly sworn on JAMES H. BUDD Application for approval to short plat 0.71 acres of property into three (3) lots (file oath,deposes t nd says that she is the chief clerk of short plat 071-84)and approval of a waiver THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a of off-site improvements (file W-072-84); week.That sail newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been property located at 1402 N. 36th Street. for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, Legal descriptions of the files noted printed and pt blished in the English language continually as a newspaper above are on file in the Renton Building and published four (4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is Zoning Department. now and durir g all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit, King County,AUGUST 7, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Land Use Hearing Ronald G. Nelson Washington.That the annexed is a Building and Zoning Director Published in the Daily Record Chronicle July 27, 1984. R9297 as it was published in regular issues(and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of one consecutive issues,commencing on the 2 7 thday cf July 19 84 , and ending the day of 19 ,both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee CITY OF RENT charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $2.7 6.O RE N which g TNhasbeenpaidinfullattherateofperfolioofonehundredword-s for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent oinsertion. SEP 12 1984 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.Chief Cle Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 7 th day of Jury 19....8 4 2c- Notary Public in aqd r the State of Washington, r siding at Matt King County. Fecir:A*o.11 Nay Passed by I he Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. VN*87 Revised 6'82 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL Public Notice DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COM- constructed in two phases. The first MITTEE phase will be 99 units to be located on RENTON, WASHINGTON the south side of Honey Creek;property The Environmental Review Committee located in the vicinity of the 2200 block ERC) has issued a final declaration of of Jefferson Avenue N E non-significance for the following projects: LARRY M. BROWN (ECF-075-84) FRANK FISHCHER (ECF-073-84) Application to rezone 0 72 acre of Application to rezone 0.14 acre of property from G-1 to L 1 file R 077-84; property from R-3 to B-1 to allow a located on the north and south sides of future beauty shop to be located on the S W Grady Way at the 1300 block, subject property,file R-076-84;located between Oaksdale Avenue S W and at 426 Burnett Avenue South Longacres Drive S.W Further information regarding this action CITY OF RENTON,POLICY DEVELO- is available in the Building and Zoning MENT DEPARTMENT(ECF-074-84) Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Honey Creek Comprehensive Plan Washington, 235 2550 Any appeal of Amendment. A study has been pre- ERC action must be filed with the Hearing pared to review inconsistent corn Examiner by July 30, 1984. prehensive plan designations in the Published in the Daily Record Chronicle area of Honey Creek Park plat and July 16, 1984 R9266 adjacent transmission line easement in the northeast quadrant area The Environmental Review Committee ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following projects. HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES(ECF- 014-84) Application to rezone 48.5 acres of property from G-1 to G-1,R-1,and R-2. file R-014-84, and for approval of a preliminary PUD consisting of a multi- family condominium development hav- ing 185 housing units, file PPUD-015- 84 This revised application is to be I 4_•A Affidavit of PublicationY T T STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. Q (g,11 COUNTY OF KING AUG 10 1984 Cindy...Strupp being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that..She is the of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Washington.That the annexed is a ERC as it was published in regular issues(and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of ...Me consecutive issues,commencing on the l.6thay of...July 19..8 4 ,and ending the day of 19 ,both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $.1.7...6,Owhich has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and per folio of hundred words for each subsequent insertion. PIOChiefCerk \ Subscribed and sworn to before me this 16th day of July 19 84 Notary Public in and the State of Washington, re iding at M , King County. Federal Way Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. VN#87 Revised 5/82 r< 076, - gy OF R 4 THE CITY OF RENTONo IP z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 oo BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 90 O CITY CLERK • (206) 235-25000,9gTED SEp1P October 8, 1984 Mr. John T. Quintinskie 426 Burnett Ave. S Renton, WA 98055 Subject: City of Renton Ordinance No. 3844 Fischer Rezone 076-84 Dear Mr. Quintinskie: The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of September 24 , 1984 adopted Ordinance No. 3844 changing the zoning classification of certain properties within the City of Renton from Residence District (R-3) to Business District (B-1) As a condition of the rezone a restrictive covenants was filed with King County Records and Elections receiving recording no. 8409060648. A copy of the Ordinance and Restrictive Covenants is enclosed. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor City Clerk enclosures cc: Hearing Examiner CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3844 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-3) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT B-1) (FISCHER R-076-84) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No . 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residence District (R-3) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Building and Zoning Department on or about June 26 , 1984, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about August 7 , 1984, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto , NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the 1- r Hearing Examiner dated August 17 , 1984 ; the Building & Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance , as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Said property being located at 426 Burnett Avenue South, Renton, Washington ) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about September 5 , 1984 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections , Receiving No. 8409060648 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage , approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 24th day of September, 1984 . ef2-220_3-tel-L, Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 24th day of September , 1984 . arithbanco SRuairc.....e.. Barbara Y. SWinpoch ayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Wa en, City Attorney Date of Publication: September 28, 1984 Ordinance No 3844 * } Rezone 076-84 Exhibit "A" Property of John J . Quintinskie Single family dwelling located at 426 Burnett Avenue South, Renton, King County, Washington, Lot No. 6, Block No. 27, Town of Renton, as recorded in Volume I , Page 135, Record of King County, Washington. 0I1,' 2/• 0 o;" A, 7 2/ o+ IVicb,A ' 41, h/ 2 e°°LO e°° 4o Cja 20 1 1- o o w v, J1 h qq 1Z 4, Z 0 /9 M 2 "e 14 ti R /9 t oZC p p O Y1 0 OtiM h 4p 0B°°, O/6 = v, ' /3 4 0/q, 0,5/8 m Zo ti 10' ti 0 z o 50 0 40 ° 7 = AE°,1 '" bl°°°° 3 / 794 8 n r9"7o 0°0 15° 00 /6 // 7L. s N 1ly ti 1 110401 o /6 J0 3o /5. 03 Z 0 W Qs0h <' /4z0T.?P y DST. v.)M 11 afil- 73c /6os/y r°n I 2 9 n 00 ho°'°o0 20 00 0 Z Ito p I. O) R 2 4 bS b°h/9 e` p R' s—- --r ti LC) 1' CO y • to ti b• o p Ou 1 qq YQ I 60 50 3 Dell b Ay /B ; MGbh' / o E L 5'°` 2 ^ r 0o N 32°°° 0 a keh ti N i o M3 M h• 30h in 7% • 4. 13 / J ' 4s' 4f3-' Y; o° Jit. ( 6 e o sic c . 09 5 m mN ^ h 1hh S ti°o ot7/lo ' 3 L., 1 G `I 0 "' 2? ( 4° 40 40 0, 1\ 4 a a zo peo0 4P 30 3 °^ e h Boom/ o 0A z ° 40 4° ' ono 11yvy D tip yo° p,6 /5t 1 zo 's..... V i N 20 a r 7 +eoj15 pz 6 7 ip o a s v . 1. fh a 18 ¢°ors° 32. 0006/S , m p 0 CS0 y 1"`or 9 4 8°'4 0 04 tia\ 3 k 0zoi. 9 •3 ; o G 4 O 9° d°° o 7 ti4ti 2 okl1° or'o°° d o0U hoo5as01 /2eh /0 Atih it ti // 0 20 i2o q / Z so , Z Zo- 0 O y ( STN A 6.) - 2 - Zo Q 0 30 30 O ZO °°p() /6 ' el O 40 1z0 a 17,11224 h h /o° 0 h c,° Lah 0 o a off_ 0 j L Zk b 1 234 v- 2 to\° c 234 2 c oo o to GP of 2h1h19 r 0 9 0` 22 ' 3 A oclh g60 ‘0 22 = o o°° aORPd 3 z'' u 1,61 Cl8 6 15° 2/ ' 1 r ) a•9 ,0 2/ . a Q A. S 20 ao, kb°n1 20 T 4' tih 17 I W 4 n 110 i Renton City Council 9/24/84 Page five Ordinances and Resolutions continued Ordinance #3842 An ordinance was read amending portions of Title V (Business Police Regulations) of the City Code relating to police investigations Investigations of business license applications. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY of Business MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. City Attorney License Warren cited State Supreme Court Case Myrick v. Pierce Applications County in which certain regulations regarding police background investigations of business license applicants have been declared unconstitional since applicants are penalized for the same crime twice. Upon inquiry by Council , he indicated that adoption of the ordinance is advisory, not mandatory, to protect the City from suit; that registering objections to the legislation with the Court would be to little avail ; and the Council ' s only course of action would be to petition the State Legislature. It was noted that the cities of Kent and Enumclaw have also passed similar legislation. For the record, Councilwoman Keolker attributed timely adoption of this legislation to City Attorney Warren' s conscientious attention to recent court decisions. She noted that other cities are just now being made aware of potential jeopardy as a result of this court case, and City Attorney Warren should be commended for timely action. ROLL CALL: 5 AYES: HUGHES, CLYMER, TRIMM, MATHEWS, KEOLKER. 2 NAYS: REED, STREDICKE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3843 An ordinance was read amending portions of Title VI (Police Massage Parlor Regulations) of City Code relating to regulation of massage Regulations businesses, defining prohibited activities and declaring a nuisance. It was noted that adoption of this ordinance is also required to comply with aforementioned court case. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6 AYES: HUGHES, CLYMER, TRIMM, MATHEWS, REED, KEOLKER. 1 NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3844 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of Fischer Rezone property located at 426 Burnett Avenue South from Residence R-076-84 District (R-3) to Business District (B-1 ) ; Fischer Rezone; File No. R-076-84. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. Councilman Stredicke objected to approval of business zoning in a predominantly single family neighborhood. Gene Williams, Policy Development Department, indicated that although his department had reservations regarding potential development under existing R-3 zoning which allows a dense apartment building, approval for business zoning had been recommended with certain conditions to protect the neighborhood. ROLL CALL: 5 AYES: HUGHES, CLYMER, TRIMM, MATHEWS, KEOLKER. 2 NAYS: REED, STREDICKE. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented the following ordinances for first reading: Sinnett Annexation A ordinance was read annexing property located west of Powell Avenue SW and north of SW Third Place and south of South 134th Street. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Sinnett Rezone An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located west of Powell Avenue SW and north of SW Third Place and south of South 134th Street from General Classification District (G-1) to Residence District (R-1) ; Sinnett Rezone; File No. R-007-84. (Annexation and Rezone applications were reviewed concurrently under new procedure; both annexation and rezone ordinances will be effective five days after publication, annexation ordinance to be adopted first.) MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Local Improvement An ordinance was read amending Chapter 24 entitled Procedure District in Foreclosure of Delinquent Local Improvement Assessments, Foreclosure Title I (Administrative) of City Code by adding new sections Procedure involving payment for attorney' s fees for foreclosing delinquent assessment liens, authorizing acceleration on default of payment of LID assessments, establishing the dates for sale of property after lien foreclosure, and establishing date of commencement of foreclosure. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT SEPTEMBER 24, 1984 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Eliminating Police Investigation of Business License Applications Massage Businesses Fischer Rezone, R-076-84 - From R-3 to B-1 (426 Burnett Ave. S.) Wall & Redekop Street Vacation Amendment - VAC 9-78 The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Sinnett Rezone, R-007-84 - From G-1 to R-1 (west side of Powell Ave SW between SW Langston Rd and SW Third P1) Sinnett Annexation Delinquent LID Assessment Procedure The Ways and Means Committee presents the following ordinance without recommendation: Brown Annexation (East side of 104th Ave. SE) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading and adoption if approved at Public Hearing: Authorizing Sale of Surplus Equipment - October 13, 1984, 10 AM City Shops facility 3555 N.E. 2nd St. , Renton APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends Approval of Vouchers No. 2393 through No. 2650 in the amount of $722,228.82. Ea yme , airma John Reed 1/ 0/1 1-4GG • Nancy Ma4ws Renton City Council 9/17/84 Page five Old Business continued Planning and Upon inquiry by Councilwoman Keolker, Gene Williams, Policy Development Development Department, indicated that the City has not adopted Committee Greenbelt Regulations prior to this time, and Committee changes Greenbelt to Planning Commission recommendations are minor. These Regulations relate to special studies exemption for steep slope areas for continued only one single family home; and imposing a sliding scale for greenbelt requirements within utility easements and rights-of- way. Councilwoman Keolker also requested notification to owners of property located adjacent to greenbelt designations that "Greenbelt" allows certain low-density development and is not limited to open space. Mayor Shinpoch indicated the matter would be investigated. MOTION CARRIED. G. M. Associates Referencing a letter from City Attorney Lawrence J. Warren Rezone Request regarding the G. M. Associates request for extension of time for Time Extension limit imposed for development during rezone approval , it was R-019-82 MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Keolker presented a Committee report regarding the bid opening held for the Renton Area RAMSC Parking Lot Multi-Service Center parking lot paving project. The low Paving Project bid of G. C. Finn Construction Company was reviewed, and the Committee recommends acceptance of the negotiated low bid of $20,767.52 ( including tax) and authorization for execution of necessary contract. The project is being funded from the Housing & Community Development Block Grant Program. Discussion indicated the matter should be held in Committee until legal opinion on parameters of negotiable bid is obtained. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Business License An ordinance was read amending portions of Title V (Business Police Investigations Regulations) of the City Code relating to police investigations of business license applications. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Massage Parlor An ordinance was read amending portions of Title VI (Police Regulations Regulations) of City Code relating to regulation of massage businesses, defining prohibited activities and declaring a nuisance. Chairman Clymer explained both ordinances have been proposed to comply with Washington Supreme Court decision on Myrick v. Pierce County which declared unconstitutional certain regulations concerning massage businesses. A severability clause will be added prior to adoption. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Tischer Rezone An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of R-076-84 property located at 426 Burnett Avenue South from Residence District (R-3) to Business District (B-1 ) ; Fischer Rezone; File No. R-076-84) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Wall & Redekop An ordinance was read vacating a portion of Lakeview Avenue Street Vac_,tion and Renton Avenue between NE 4th and NE 5th Streets and VAC 9-78 amending the legal description contained in prior ordinance No. 3341 (VAC 9-78) . Chairman Clymer stated that adoption of the ordinance is required to reaffirm action taken by the City Council in 1979. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following resolution for reading & adoption: Renton City Council 9/17/84 Page six Ordinances and Resolutions continued Resolution #2568 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk Rainier Avenue S. to execute documents requesting allocation of federal funds Signal Funding for the Rainier Avenue South signal enhancement project. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2569 A resolution was read providing for funds transfer in the Pedestrian Corridor/ amount of $34,765.00 from Contingency Fund unto Pedestrian Shop Site Redevelop- Corridor/Shop Site Redevelopment Project Fund to provide ment Fund Transfer for the City' s share of five percent. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Hughes referenced a letter from Mayor Business Standards Shinpoch responding to the Council referral of 8/13/84 for Liquor regarding business standards for liquor establishments. Establishments The recommendations were that the City should not impose Slick Willy' s separate business standards for establishments selling Tavern Referral ) liquor, particularly due to possible difficulties enforcing local restrictions more stringent than imposed by the State. Any new commercial use must comply with Zoning, Building and Fire Codes which consider all facets of development impact, and enforcement of these Codes shall continue in protection of the public. And the City should not involve itself in limiting competition in business or making determinations about economic viability. Mayor Shinpoch also indicated that Title 66 of the Washington Administrative Code contains over 40 pages devoted to Liquor Board regulations; one which provides the local elected official an opportunity to request a hearing which the Liquor Board may grant. Council President Hughes concurred in the Mayor' s recommendations, and indicated that while the Council had gone the "extra mile" in holding a public meeting regarding the liquor license for Slick Willy' s, any future public objections to business establishments by residents should go through routine City and State procedures. Fischer Rezone Councilman Stredicke indicated concern regarding adoption R-076-84 of an ordinance approving the Fischer Rezone (first reading this date) since it allows business use in a primarily residential area on Burnett Avenue. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch expressed sadness at the recent death of REPORT Dick Seraile, 43, member of the City' s Library Board since September of 1983, and well-respected by those who knew him. Earlington Park Responding to Council inquiry 9/10/84 regarding the Earlington Improvement Park Improvement Project, Mayor Shinpoch indicated that the Project sole bidder was able to make a lower bid for the small project since he is the contractor for another project in the City, and his equipment is already transported to the area. Executive Session MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO Time: 9:39 p.m. EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS. CARRIED. Regular Session Council reconvened into regular session; roll was called; all members were present. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL GO ON RECORD AS SUPPORTING THE CONCEPT PRESENTED BY THE ADMINISTRATION WITH REGARD TO NEGOTIATIONS ADJOURNMENT WITH THE POLICE OFFICERS' GUILD. CARRIED. MOVED BY Time: 10: 10 p.m. STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT SEPTEMBER 17, 1984 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Relating to Police Investigation of Business License Applications Massage Businesses Fischer Rezone, R-076-84 - From R-3 to B-1 (426 Burnett Ave. S.) Wall & Redekop Street Vacation Amendment - VAC 9-78 The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading and further requests suspension of the rules advancing it to second and final : Permanent Financing for LID 314 The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for reading and adoption: Allocation of Federal Funds for Rainier Ave. S. Signal Transfer of Funds for Pedestrian Corridor/Shop Site Redevelopment Earl Clymer, Chairman John Reed Nancy Mathews M CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3844 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-3) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT B-1) (FISCHER R-076-84) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No . 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residence District (R-3) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Building and Zoning Department on or about June 26 , 1984, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about August 7 , 1984 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto , NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the 1- Hearing Examiner dated August 17 , 1984 ; the Building & Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Said property being located at 426 Burnett Avenue South, Renton, Washington ) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about September 5, 1984 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections , Receiving No. 8409060648 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage , approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 24th day of September, 1984. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 24th day of September , 1984 . aGthbarliA3 Barbara Y. SHiinpoch ayor Approved as to form: G9 Lawrence J. Wat en, City Attorney Date of Publication: September 28 , 1984 Ordinance No 3844 Rezone 076-84 Exhibit "A" Prope-ty of John J. Quintinskie Single family dwelling located at 426 Burnett Avenue South, Renton, King County, Washington, Lot No. 6, Block No. 27, Town of Renton, as recorded in Volume 1 , Page 135, Record of King County, Washington. A411' Z/. 2 v /' G/ p 1? zg7v h/ tip''"/ 2 o cn O 3T N I. o Q I v 0. 02- 10c u p W v\ / Z h 4e° 14/ 9; M ' / 2 n 14ti / 9 2 z 0 0z o a O: S h 8 01 wrfr• / 0 400 o/ 6 : 8 ' / 3 4e° q, 1 os, s/ 8 o r; co 20 es. 10' ti4, I O} q z0 tl 50 ) 11 0 0 po o N j0o cos 9 ro"' o 7 Z ne „ b o / 7 Ito Orq, 1 ({{ N ^ / i/. 84. 9• fBn L09h o°/ Q 411. W / 6 ' Z f 7('. S W n 1, 0 a o1 / 6 p 30 30 / 1 huh n Zo Z',? • a ,. o+ 1os, osu /. 1. - 3a s 1, Tao I170JIJ 1 S T. 4 o µJ M yuZ" Gh15• a 730 11 o5/ 9 m 40 40 7 Fro R: 1L / 20 IA 40 2 h / 4 tiro° 00°° 0 20 o 0 Ito 0 N) 00 LO 0I. 0. h i 0 Qu J, 4 P QS 50 3 attPoi‘ CPC) b Ay / g il 6oi.• a ,/ i„. e '/ o 4 Pn V. rneg`{ 463 2 ** 0 3o"° o W ti° c,, h N 4. 13 / , 4i..... L.,. • c o' ‘_' 41 ecc 3 - - c,• y. 1° 5 , 4 V h o\ in J it. 10 0 ' o tief'// o ' h'' 0 .. " 1° 40 ¢ o 40 1 0 poo0 3 9tl h V a s zo 1 lirZ 1, P 30 30 '/ ok10 o„ h 15: t e°° m/ 7 a o° o0 60/ 5 ; Cn40 40D/ 15 i tia 20 — 11 .. N• e, c,' i' 7 *° 0°° 116 Li_ 40 rOcii‘ ;-. N ,, h v 4 o py 1 1. v, N s 8 + eo1Do ( el4001s ; 8c: D1, 00:° oo ti \ 3 40 04 pi. t 9 pi4 • 16OW 4; i) 2 0 p 4 11 p 48°° ° k600 O. 9 i. P 2 eP p19 oc. 0 1V 4, 0 o° Bo°°° O no p0v 0 to ki• oPr) l< n I crN Ads.) 2 - 2d_ 609 30 30 20 O0 / 6 20 0 40 rto Zo 24 h h / OpOy h oz h a too 0 h o i4 c, z 234 4 2 ABO°\ Q y, 23 2 ppo 0 0` 4 h o 0 c tik 161 / 9 9 01 22 z 3 A c 00 4 96 0% 0 22 o 3 As tso 8/ ' n aB \ 0 2/ : a cq o , 0 l 00 CO ' i p° 0 ee 5 2O ' /\ t 5 a\ CL At°°, 20 , t- . ' 4 tiya° I 7 o Renton City Council 9/10/84 Page four Consent Agenda continued Surplus Equipment Finance/Purchasing Department requested that a public hearing Auction - Public be set on 9/24/84 to consider proposed surplus equipment Hearing Set auction on 10/13/84. Set public hearing and refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution declaring disposition of surplus equipment. Fischer Rezone Land Use Hearing Examiner recommended approval with restrictive R-076-84 covenants of Frank Fischer Rezone, File No. R-076-84, 0. 14 acres from R-3, Multifamily, to B-1 , Business/Commercial , zone at 426 Burnett Avenue South for a future beauty salon. (Covenants filed with King County 9/6/84.) Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Sunset Boulevard Public Works/Engineering Department submitted CAG-076-84, Project Sunset Boulevard NE improvements from Bronson Way to 1-405; CAG-076-84 and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of 57,180.20 to contractor, H. L. Jacobson, Jr. Construction Company if all required releases have been received. Council concur. Sunset Pump Public Works/Engineering Department submitted CAG-020-84, Station Sanitary Sunset Pump Station System Sanitary Sewer: TV Inspection Sewer Sewer Grouting and Smoke Testing; and requested approval of the CAG-020-84 project, authorization for final pay estimate, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of 1 ,439.47 to contractor, Gelco Grouting Service, if all required releases have been received. Council concur. Renton Airport Public Works/Engineering Department submitted CAG-039-84, Perimeter Road Renton Municipal Airport West Perimeter Road Street Improvements Improvment; and requested approval of the project, authoriza- CAG-039-84 tion for final pay estimate, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $2,644.89 to contractor, R. W. Scott Construction Company, if all required releases have been received. Council concur. Airport Noise Public Works/Airport Department submitted letter from Mrs. Anne Healy, 222 Burnett Avenue N. , concerning noise from Renton Municipal Airport. Refer to Aviation Committee. Consent Agenda MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Approved CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested his "no" vote be recorded. (See page 6 for comments.) OLD BUS `NESS Community Services Committee Chairman Keolker presented a Community Services report for information only regarding the Group W Cable TV Committee proposed rate increase (referred 6/18/84) and matter of Group W Cable TV completion of the cable system construction project (referred 7/2/84) . After meeting with representatives of the cable company and the City' s cable consultant, Lon Hurd, the Committee reported the following: Rate Increase 1 . Group W Cable has withdrawn its request for rate increase Witndrawn at this time. Letter from Group W Community Affairs Manager Wm. Covington was read which reports delays in completing cable system construction have caused withdrawal of rate increase requests until such time as the work is substantially completed. (See motion on page five. ) Refund to 2. Group W Cable has agreed to conditions of Resolution #2554 Commercial which directed that all commercial rate payers billed in Customers excess of the basic service rate previously approved by the Council receive a refund or a credit applied to future billings. Letters are being sent to affected customers. Construction 3. Group W has provided a schedule indicating cable system Schedule construction completion dates, which reflects service by cable to all areas of the City by the end of September, 1984, except Cedar Avenue South which should be completed by the end of October, 1984. P Oft For Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING a SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. HEARING EXAMINER'S OFFICE For Agenda Of September 10, 1984 Meeting Date) Staff Contact FRED J . KAUFMAN Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Frank Fischer rezone request Consent to allow beauty shop at 426 Burnett Ave So. Public Hearing Correspondence Rezone from R-3 to B-l . Ordinance/Resolution XX Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. See attached to Covenants Other B. C Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval with Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Other Clearance Restrictive Ccvenants recorded. FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Recuired $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) AttacI additional pages if necessary. ) SEe Report and Decision of Hearing Examiner dated August 17, 1984. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. For. Use By City Clerk's Office Only j A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING I SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. HEARING EXAMINER'S OFFICE For Agenda Of September 10, 1984 Meeting Date) Staff Contact FRED J. .KAUFMAN ame) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Fr;=i;ak IcrFanr rr?7nalP frPnaarct Consent Public Hearing 1-n ni lns-.r inr'snPai'6r c;$ nr kiaaa^nt , Asrr, o. Correspondence Rezone from k"3 to a"1 a Ordinance/Resolution r : Old Business Lscr. ,Exhibits: (Legl Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A. S, r nc•c Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A ' COUNCIL ACTION. RECOMMENDED: Approval with Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A { Other Clearance Restrictive Covenants recorded. P FISCAL IMPACT: I Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ hBudgetedTransferRequired SUMMARY (Backgrour'd information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) Soeeport and Decision of Hoer i nqi E;cami nor dated August 17, 1984. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: ti' u I THIi S COPY TO BE SUBMITTED ON TUESDAY AT DEPARTMENT HEAD MEETING. 4 ` j V r n I 17 rvf yt it c ,. i \ v a li DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS I i I i WHERE A S, John J. Quintinskie is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, C;I un y of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHERE A 5;+ the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive, covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. I I I I NOW, T EREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenant running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, t eir successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: 1. The welling's outside appearance is to be preserved with minimal modifications, so I that it r tains the appearance of a single family dwelling. I I 2. The interior shall be utilized for a beauty shop of not more than 1,500 sq. ft. of interior space or as otherwise limited by parking requirements. 3. No ocher uses may be permitted on the premises. i II j I I I I I I I ' 4. The site shall be landscaped and such landscaping shall be maintained in good condition as determined by the City's landscape architect. 5. Any violation of the covenants shall result in a forfeiture of the occupancy permit for the structure. Ui DURATION These c venants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further doculIrne tation. Any vioth do or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures i the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoi ing subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. a fir/ , d. l -, H JOHN J. QUINTINSKIE I i STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of -<ING On this54, day of-dep. 1984, before me personally appeared the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. No jry Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at kie.< Exhibit "A" Property of John J. Quintinskie Rezone #076-84 Single family dwelling located at 426 Burnett Avenue South, Renton, King County, Washington , Lot No. 6, Block No. 27, 1/4 Sec. S.E. Sec. 18, Township 23, Range 05. J' y . Frank Fischer 723 Rainier Ave . S. Renton, Washington 98055 City Clerk City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, John J. Quintinskie is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHE:REAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real prop€rty. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersign 3d, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: 1. "he dwelling's outside appearance is to be preserved with minimal modifications, so that it retains the appearance of a single family dwelling. 2. —he interior shall be utilized for a beauty shop of not more than 1,500 sq. ft. of interior spa(e or as otherwise limited by parking requirements. 3. fJo other uses may be permitted on the premises. 4. —he site shall be landscaped and such landscaping shall be maintained in good condition as d;termined by the City's landscape architect. 5. I,ny violation of the covenants shall result in a forfeiture of the occupancy permit for the structure. DURATION These: covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordir lances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further docui nentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. JOHN J. UINTINSKIE STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of KING On this ' day of 11984, before me personally appeared the person(s) who executed the within and fore ing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and volurtary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN 'WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. OA-L- 1U Li) Notary Pub i and for he State of Washington, residing at Exhibit "A" Property of John J . Quintinskie Single family dwelling located at 426 Burnett Avenue South, Renton, King County, Washington, Lot No. 6, Block No. 27, Town of Renton, as recorded in Volume 1 , Page 135, Record of King County, Washington. OF RA,A R THE CITY OF RENTON Zo MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 NA o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9 co-FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593 0 P 17'F0 SEPE ' September 4, 1984 Mr. John :I. Quintinskie 426 Burnett Avenue So. Renton, IN a. 98055 RE: File No. R-076-84 Frank Fischer Dear Mr. Quintinskie: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter will be submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for review, as soon as we have received your signed and notarized Restrictive Covenants. You will receive notification of final approval, as well as a copy of the enacting ordinance, from the City Clerk upon adoption by the City Council. If further assistance or information is desired, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, r Fred J. KalTfman Land Use Hearing Examiner FJK:dk 0685E cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department Frank Fischer DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, John J. Quintinskie is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restricth a covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real prop 3rty. NON, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigr ed, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows: 1. The dwelling's outside appearance is to be preserved with minimal modifications, so tha it retains the appearance of a single family dwelling. 2. The interior shall be utilized for a beauty shop of not more than 1,500 sq. ft. of interior space or as otherwise limited by parking requirements. 3. \Jo other uses may be permitted on the premises. 4. The site shall be landscaped and such landscaping shall be maintained in good condition as cetermined by the City's landscape architect. 5. Any violation of the covenants shall result in a forfeiture of the occupancy permit for the structure. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further docu rentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. JOHN J. JUINTINSKIE STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of KING On this day of 1984, before me personally appeared the person(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year I irst above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Exhibit "A" A Property of John J. Quintinskie Rezone #076-84 Single family dwelling located at 426 Burnett Avenue South, Renton, King County, Washington, Lot No. 6, Block No. 27, 1/4 Sec. S.E. Sec. 18, Township 23, Range 05. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 17th day of August 1984, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /2 day of4ALL 1984. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: FRANK FISCHER - R-076-84 The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) 0656E August 17, 1984 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT ,\ND DECISION. APPLICANT: FRANK FISCHER FILE NO. R-076-84 LOCATION: 426 Burnett Avenue South SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval to rezone 0.14 acre of property from R-3 to B-1 to allow a future beauty shop on the subject property. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with restrictive covenants. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with signing of Restrictive Covenants. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on August 2, 1984. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hear:ng was opened on August 7, 1984, at 9:35 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. T he following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application and other documents pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Assessors Map Exhibit #3 - Site Map The hearing was opened and Jeanette McKague, representing the Zoning Department, presented the staff report. She stated the request is to allow a beauty shop to be located in an already established residence. There is approx. 1500 sq. ft. of living space in the residence, and the structure meets all the setback requirements for the B-1 zone. The proposed use is compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan It was noted that the applicant is willing to sign restrictive covenants restricting the property to non-retail commercial activities. This would create a use buffer between the commercial uses to the north and the multiple family uses to the south. Mrs. McKague addressed the timeliness of this application stating the creating of this use buffer would provide a definite border and establish the concept of use buffers in the subject south Renton area. The use 3f an existing structure for the proposed beauty shop would not intrude into the single family area to the south as would a new structure. The remodeling of the existing structure will have to meet all of the Building and Fire Department codes as well as the parking code. It was noted that the dimensions in the rear yard would allow approximately six parking spaces. Parking could face the existing parking for the VFW hall and landscaping will be provided along the southerly property line. Improvements to the alley and provisions for storm drainage would be required. Mrs. McKague said staff would recommend approval of this request subject to restrictive covenants limiting the on-site uses to non-commercial activities. The Hearing Examiner called for testimony from the applicant or their representative. Responding was: Frank Fischer 723 Rainier Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 FRANK FISCHER R-076-84 August 17, 1984 Page 2 Mr. Fischer stated he agrees with the staff report as presented and the Hearing Examiner reiterated to Mr. Fischer the fact that even if the rezone is approved the structure itself may not comply with the requirements of the building code and extensive modification may be required to bring the building into conformance. Mr. Fischer acknowledged he is willing to do what is necessary to comply with all city codes. The Hearing Examiner called for further testimony in support of, or in opposition to this proposal. There was no one else wishing to speak, the Examiner closed the public hearing at 9:40 A.V1. FINDING, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1.The applicant, Frank Fischer, filed a request for approval of reclassification of approximately .14 acres of property from R-3 (Medium Density Multi-family) to B-l. 2.The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non- Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5.There was no opposition to the subject proposal from any member of the public. 6.The subject site is located at 426 Burnett Avenue South. The property is on the ea'3t side of Burnett and abuts the VFW Hall which is north of the site. 7.Ar existing single family home is located on the subject site. The home is currently utilized as a dwelling. 8.The subject site was probably part of the original town site of the City. The site was zoned L-1 (Light Industry) until reclassified to R-3, its current status, in 1980 by Ordinance 3490. 9. South of the subject site are residential uses. Similar uses are located across Bt.rnett to the west. 10. TI-e map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as transitional, with areas nearer Houser and 4th apparently suitable for the development of commercial uses, while the areas further from the intersection suitable for residential purposes. The Comprehensive Plan does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 11. The applicant proposes converting the existing residence to a beauty shop which would be a permissible use in the B-1 district. While specific plans for use are not required for a reclassification of property, the applicant has suggested that the site be limited to only the beauty shop and only within the confines of the existing st"ucture, a single family facade. The limitation would be implemented by the use of restrictive covenants. This would enable the business to blend with the residential uses immediately abutting the site to the south. 12. The area has seen a variety of both private development, new or renovated housing, and public development, the Burnett Linear Park, within the last couple of years. FRANK F'SCHER R-076-84 August 17, 1984 Page 3 13. T he home is located on a lot 50 feet wide by 120 feet long. The front yard is fifteen feet and a 10 foot side yard exists on the north adjacent to the VFW Hall, wh'.le a 13 foot side yard separates the structure from the residential uses to the south. 14. Immediately north of the subject site property is zoned B-1, south, property is zoned R-3. 15. The Burnett parking area is located in the Burnett island just across from the house. Parking is similarly available east of the subject site. CONCLUSIONS 1.The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, is in compliance with at least one of the three criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area- wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. T he subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The request to reclassify the subject site, with restrictions on use and appearance, appears justified. 2.The proximity of the VFW Hall, a use which has evening events which conflict with re .idential enjoyment, is located immediately to the north. Parking lots are located both east and west of the subject site which also infringe on residential enjoyment. Under the circumstances the site does not appear suitable for continued use as a dwelling. 3. At the same time, total unlimited conversion of the structure to a possible wide range of commercial or business uses would appear to jeopardize the residential character south of the site. The Comprehensive Plan appears to sanction the very difficult interface of commercial and residential in a mid-block transition. This difficulty is evident in the applicant's request. The location of the VFW Hall has interfered with the subject site's residential amenities but the transition of the subject site to commercial should be limited so as to preserve and protect the residential amenities of its next southerly neighbor. 4.As proposed by the applicant, conversion of the interior of the structure to a beauty shop while preserving the external appearance would help blend the scale an i character into the southerly residential uses. The beauty shop also should not draw a large clientele since appointments and limited floor space dictate limitations. 5.The reclassification to B-1 would be a logical extension of the B-1 district to the subject site. Extension beyond this point would not appear reasonable in that a firm limit of transition must be established. 6. Parking space for the proposed use is available and can be provided in the rear yard while still preserving the necessary side yards for landscape buffering. Parking by the VFW Hall patrons should be discouraged as the noise and use generated by the Hall would be carried over to the parking area in the evening hours and could conflict with the southerly residential uses. 7.The landscaping of the entire parcel, including the parking area shall be required to be maintained in good condition and subject to approval by the City's landscape Architect. 8.The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site as proposed by the applicant. FRANK FISCHER: R-076-_ Page 4 RECOMMENDATION The City 2ouncil should approve the reclassification of the subject site from R-3 to B-1 subject to the following conditions: The execution of restrictive covenants which require: 1.The dwelling's outside appearance to be preserved with minimal modifications, so that it retains the appearance of a single family dwelling. 2.The interior shall be utilized for a beauty shop of not more than 1,500 sq ft of interior space or as otherwise limited by parking requirements. 3. No other uses may be permitted on the premises. 4. The site shall be landscaped and such landscaping shall be maintained in good condition as determined by the City's landscape architect. 5. Any violation of the covenants shall result in a forfeiture of the occupancy permit for the structure. ORDERED THIS 17th day of August, 1984. Fred J. Kaufman Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMIT TED THIS 17th day of August, 1984 to the parties of record: Frank Fischer 723 Rainier Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 TRANSM T TED THIS 17th day of August, 1984 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Gene Williams, Policy Development Department Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before August 31, 1984. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hea^ing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days frori the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All comnunications concerning the the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. PRELIMINARY REPORIIHE HEARING EXAMINER OD FRANK F ISCHER: R-076-84 AUGUST 7, 1984 PAGE 2 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides some habitat for birds. 5. Water: Water was not observed on the subject property. 6. Land Use: The subject site is currentlyutilized for a single family residence. E. NE IGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The area surrounding the subject site consists of commercial uses to the north; miltiple family and single family residential uses to the east; and single family re! idencial uses to the south and west of the subject site. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: A 24-inch water line is located along Burnett Avenue S. adjacent to the subject site. b. Sewer: An 8-inch sanitary sewer line is located adjacent to the subject site on Burnett Avenue S. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water drains into the existing storm water drainage system. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3.Transit: METRO Transit Routes Nos. 107, 108, 110, 142, 145, 144, 155, 156, 167, 240, 241, 340 and 912 operate along S. 3rd Street approximately 800 feet north of the subject property. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Not applicable. b. Middle Schools: Not applicable. c. High Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-709A, Residential - Multiple Family (R-3). 2. Section 4-711, Business Use (B-1). H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Central Renton Area Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, June 1983, p. 46-52. 2. Commercial Goal, Commercial Areas Objective and Commercial Structure and Sites Objective, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, June 1983, p. 16-17. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems: The proposed rezone action will not affect the natural systems. 2. Population/Employment: The future use of the proposed rezone site as a beauty salon is expected to employ two (2) beauty operators when developed and possibly eight (8) to ten (10) beauty operators at a later date. 3. Schools: Not applicable. 4. Social: Not applicable. 5.Traffic: The expected future use of the subject property is expected to generate approximately twenty-five (25) or less average daily trips. i 1006Z 110 BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 7, 1984 APPLICANT: FRANK FISCHER FILE NUMBER: R-076-84 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval to rezone 0.14 acre of property from R-3 to B-1 to allow a future beauty shop on the subject property. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: John J. Quintinskie 2. Applicant: Frank Fischer 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) 426 Burnett Avenue S. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department. 5. Size of Property: 0.14 acre (6,000•square feet) 6. Access: Via Burnett Avenue S. 7. Existing Zoning: R-3, Residential - Multiple Family 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-3, Residential - Multiple Family; and B-1, Business use. 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan:Border area of Commercial and Medium Density Multi-Family. 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on July 27, 1984, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by city ordinance on July 27, 1984. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site appears to be part of the original town site. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The subject property is relatively level. 2. Soils: Urban Land (Ur). This soil has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations. The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. No capability or woodland classification. 3. Vegetation: The subject site is covered with urban type vegetation consisting of grasses, shrubs, and deciduous trees. PRELIMINARY REPORTE HEARING EXAMINER FRANK FISCHER: R-076-84 AUGUST 7, 1984 PAGE 3 J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21 C, a final declaration of non-significance was issued on July 11, 1984 by the Environmental Review Committee. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building & Zoning Department. 2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division. 5. City of Renton Police Department. 6. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 7. City of Renton Policy Development Department. 8. City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department. L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1.The applicant, Frank Fischer, is requesting a rezone of approximately .14 acres of property from R-3, Multiple Family Residential, to B-1, Business Use, to allow a future beauty shop on said property. 2.A Declaration of Non-significance was issued for the subject proposal on July 11, 1984. The appeal period expired on July 30, 1984. 3.The site is presently occupied by a single family residence that has approximately 1500 square feet of living space. The house is located on the western portion of the 50 by 120 foot lot with a 15 foot front yard along Burnett Avenue South and a 10 foot side yard on the north side with a 13 foot side yard on the south side. The structure complies with all the setback requirements for commercial structures in a B-1 zone. 4. The Land Use Hearing Examiner must review four specific criteria under Section 4-3014(C) to determine that the circumstances surrounding the rezone request are adequate to recommend approval of the reclassification. The following evidence clearly demonstrates the rezone request is appropriate. a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. The subject property is part of the original township of the City of Renton. Light Industrial zoning was applied at the time of implementation of the zoning code and subsequently changed in 1980 by Ordinance 3490 when the property was downzoned to R-3, Multiple Family Residential from L-1, Light Industrial. In 1983, the Comprehensive Plan covering the Central Area was modified by Ordinance 3712. Therefore, the request complies with this criteria. b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. The applicant has presented a very detailed case showing compliance with the intent of the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. The site itself is in a transitional area between two land use designations of the Comprehensive Plan. Commercial land use activities are tended to be concentrated to the north, while medium density multiple family uses are proposed to the south. In this specific case, the applicant has an intended use of a personal service beauty shop for the subject site. PRELIMINARY REPOROO THE HEARING EXAMINER el° RANK FISCHER: R-076-84 AUGUST 7, 1984 PAGE 4 In fact, the applicant would so stipulate in restrictive covenants limiting the subject property to non-retail commercial activities. This in affect, would create a use transition buffer between the commercial uses to the north and the multiple family uses to the south. Use buffers are as effective as setback and landscape buffers to create transitions between difference intensity uses. The proposal seems to both generally and specifically comply with the designation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map and the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. The general area has been going through gradual transitions from single family to more commercial and multiple family uses. The establishment of Burnett Linear Park in 1980 along with the construction of associated parking allowed greater use of the area and a focuses upon the park located. These public improvements alone created a dramatic change in the focus of this area and has prompted redevelopment along both sides of the street. d. Timeliness: The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of timeliness. The subject property is on a boarderline between two difference intented land uses. The applicant's proposal to specifically limit the ultimate use and create a use buffer adds serious merit to the concept of allowing the rezone to provide a use buffer between the commercial uses to the north and the potential multiple family uses to the south. In fact, it would create a definite border and strongly establish the concept of use buffers in this south Renton area. All public utilities and services are available to the subject site capapable of handling the change in use. In addition, since the applicant is proposing utilizing a single family residence in the same configuration that it presently exists in, it would not intrude, such as a new structure would, into the single family area to the south. Therefore, it does appear appropriate and timely to rezone the property under certain limitation at this point. 6.The Police Department, Parks Department, Utilities Engineering Division, and Traffic Engineering Division have all recommended approval without conditions. The Building Department and Fire Prevention Bureau both state that remodeling of the existing single family structure for a commercial use would require compliance with not only the building and fire codes but also the parking code for the specific use. The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department points to the fact that storm water drainage plans would also have to be approved for the modified parking area. At the same time, the Policy Development Department has commented upon the change in use and the have taken a strong position that the request should be approved with limitations of use, if the building and parking can be provided. The building itself complies with the requirements of the zoning code for the B-1, Business Use zone. However, structural changes may have to take place incuding fire breaks, etc., inside the building. This is not a land use decision, but a technical implementation procedure that would be independent and beyond the scope of the rezone request. The parking lot is shown as a vague area. It does appear, from the dimensions in the rear yard, that approximately six parking spaces could be provided. This would only allow the conversion of the first floor or approximately 1200 square feet into commercial office or personal service activity. The parking lot can be constructed to focus towards the existing parking lot of the VFW hall while landscaping of approximately 6 feet can be provided along the southern property line. This will also require the improvement of the alley and provisions for adequate storm drainage. PRELIMINARY REPORT T4. HEP UNG EXAMINER SS FRANK FISCHER: R-076-84 AUGUST .1, 1984 PAGE 5 M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the rezone request, file R-076-84, be approved subject to the filing of restrictive covenants to specifically limit the uses on-site to non-retail commercial activities. In reverse, this will allow personal service uses such as beauty and barber shops or office uses. aim13 41 F PA 2 sffv OR oil AL 1-4 -:4 La LOA 04 db B-1 FRANK FISCHER R-O76-O4 APPLICANT FRANK FI3CHER TOTAL AREA 6,000 SO' FT' PRINCIPAL ACCESS BURNETTAVE' S. EXISTING ZONING R-3, RESIDENTIAL - MULTIPLE FAMILY EXISTING USE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPOSED USE REZONE OF PROPERTY TO B-1, COMMERCIAL ZONE TO ALLOW A BEAUTY SALON COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN BORDER AREA OF MEDIUM DENSITY MULT-FAMILY AND COMMERCIAL COMMENTS l 1 OP rr-,.....7.3.'"'.) r-=^aom Ct:. GN2 0' . .- j/A'(i V /f'.9 f/J('Q o t / s-77/- C 7 , FJdrill r° i 2/1-/,y7 y _ Jdi I l q v 5-7- ./_._/S- 7i / 4 y/)'/ /vi/ c_i a ,, z . bit s77tk15 75 / z 2r/ifvy3 0TI1 ti ...., 1 Lei 72019 - 9 if.l o l i Mg S ,S Y r7o 3J L )1 fl y ti I d+ly I i i 1 AJcam; gnorvUd ! y, 3 . a A / a.radovd Jr f ' I. I 1- q 2 In Q ^ p o y4NM3nrvCPloyONrrvVd -1Sod /`IJA Q 0 J N i,t I,- g D I 1 L.s ,s 5776-15 i, /v I e f .5 0 N1 ?iV0d N I 1 1 REVIEWING DEPARiiML .. DIVI ON : APPROVED m VED WITH CONDITION. 4141OLDPLOT APPROVED D - e S /-y- mud r ,44 - ae---v b P , P4X, z,uG cO4ZD , Er-Csic GAg) cow © t QCCc.(t=',Ti,tva c- 2 / , us A) i IAD DATE :r-i%7 SIGNATUR IRECTO:::-/7R OR AU HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : i _2/ =c1 1 APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS i INOT APPROVED 7 01e 7 62/rAf7, 29, T='/y1,ham;7,/J ,/7i s > G/..I.-' rPgIJ,/re,i- ur 4Z 7 e,CicS74/,. kix/,-,,zi A "22.e:4:_,, z. 0 e,,r4.--,,e-,.7, G'oal S ter. I (71-11/ira,1 ems, 6,;/;, erg /- `z.7s W. /V? ia,, le J/0/- j L,r)fe -:/ X7-/4! ,4JF c., //:,. _,'.,.. o-'- zr// pod-/;o A) )i ,-/4 Sh-a i/c7<-..N h e c. /e o/. DATE : 7- SIGNATU OF /DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS O NOT APPROVED liz A,..404 //to...d, 41, 5e,,,,- V 44,24„0. Atriu,e,,,ei, 7474-Le.s.,41.624 e;,..1_,L.elp A4frIA/— , tic^ V iCP C Cotzl - faMtA0e 47de)i r 7-4-A A 3 -- r Ufa- d1^ wee C a a P v a) 1 yam, 0,,,, 0 p C, GAP C %Q a J^/ .. ma c 0p x 6-Q ee ,_, ,,,41zjer3 Ag u,. , ili, G tp Gl,o Oda s sL 1 DATE : "7 to Ay" 41 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ON : n APPROVED A PRL,VED WITH CONDITIONS griv El NOT APPROVED c 2/3-/F y DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED 7 o f 7 Yi) D. 4 r- DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORZIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; l/f///f `L //1e&/i y MAPPROVED l ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ] NOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO I 7 ,0//¢ LATE CRIERS WIENER - HATER y/,ES I41-562 XS0 - G37.zYL0T.6° LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER NO 1 W M EN•TO t•l SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CNAIGE • WATER j/,c-S• /f 44,e6.E_.e,1i - ,e Ubc SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEWER y-CE. 4p CONN,FCT-A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • HATER ,, I SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE SEWER A/O APPROVED WATER PLAN NO APPROVED SEWER PLAN W..•• APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT ATIONS BY FIRE DEPT J t5 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS%' / pc> KO J DATE : 7/09-" SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : T APPROVEDOVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 1A„..,41, 7_ i-t. / R DATE ; SIGNATURE OF DI ECT R OR iiUTHO:.IZED REPRESEN ATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Y APPROVE ) I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 0457N FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Applicatio i No(s): R-076-84 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-073-84 Description of Proposal:Application to rezone 0.14 acre of property from R-3 to B-1 to allow a future beauty shop to be located on the subject property. Proponent Frank Fischer Location et Proposal: Located at 426 Burnett Avenue South. Lead Agerci: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on July 11, 1984, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Gene Williams, Jerry Lind, Robert Bergstrom, Richard Houghton, Michael Parness, Roger Blaylock, Ronald Nelson, Gary Norris, and James Gray. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-073-34 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Frank Fischer, dated June 26, 1984. 2. Applications: Rezone (R-076-84). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities Encineering Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Policy Development Department, Parks and Recreation Department, and the Police Department. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a sicnificant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject rezone request will not adversely impact the environment. SIGNATUI ES: oval ( . Nelson Michael Parrfss Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor ichard C. Hough on U Public Wcrks Director PUBLISHED: JULY 16, 1984 APPEAL )ATE: JULY 30, 1984 410 4101' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 073 - 84 APPLICATION No(s ) : REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT: FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE: FISCHER REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH SITE AREA: 6000 SO. FT. BUILDING AREA (Gross) : N/A DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : x 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: 3) Water & Water Courses : 4) Plant Life:x 5) Animal Life: x 6) Noise: x 7) Light & Glare: x 8) Land Use; North: COMMERCIAL East : MIXED SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI FAMILY South: MIXED SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI FAMILY West : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Land Use Conflicts : POSSIBLE W/RESIDENTIAL TO SOUTH View Obstruction: NONE ANTICIPATED 9) Natural Resources : x 10) Risk of Upset : X 11) Population/Employment : X 12) Number of Dwellings : (1) x 13) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 25 TRIP ENDS ESTIMATED Traffic Impacts : MINOR 14) Public Services: x 15) Energy: X 16) Utilities: X 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/History: x Signatures: 41;1&/_,/ z' Ronald G. Nelso n I' c el Parness Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor et4,1.44-4-1 /' PUBLISHED: JULY 16, 1984 Richard C. Hought n APPEAL DATE: JULY 30, 1984 Public Works Director lu It .6p, p—ii P— 1 s f tv oq I v 5.1. J7.f—_— r , ":2 E -'l-1 ji 54 pL TI roll 10 10 AL Lw 0 01-1 FRANK FISCH[R R-076-84 i APPLICANT FRANK FISCHER TOTAL AREA - 6,000 SO' FT' PRINCIPAL ACCESS BURNETT AVE. S. EXISTING ZONING R-3, RESIDENTIAL - MULTIPLE FAMILY EXISTING USE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPOSED USE REZONE OF PROPERTY TO B-1, COMMERCIAL ZONE TO ALLOW A BEAUTY SALON COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN BORDER AREA OF MEDIUM DENSITY MULT-FAMILY AND COMMERCIAL COMMENTS I 11 I 0 5• c. 1 4, 1 T.1- 1 PO A l- k I IV C s' r' c z. r 1 t.„,. \.,.....c: Zcz, 1 V F k/ Po sT- Polotiern? C. ho r cf ii. ive- 14/ 41 tt • C I% G, _. , • ___ „.. 7„, 7-- 1 c, c c A 4 - 4 ; 1 :' 31' prLopolio , 71 .. 7-, 524 4s I Si• re i 1. 1_ PAiloba. I i) i RteA I n , I ti III 7 T; 1 i S. 11. 1 4C. S I 1 III : 1 6 a.,.. ... i., o r 4 6 - 840,, e0A7 I: Lue, fi 3 Ne; ei, k/, VG t. CT' 1,.... . 4' r c. Li/ 5- 74/ 4e 1 0 .- N P t i',.., A r.... r5, . t 1- P44x/ A/ K F" V c?. y 1 3 - 1- P 7---— I 51 5-- i- Ze_ s• 0 I 1__ 1 s-) I c-.•., 0 77, g a LIF Ai it) r 1..: L.. ,.. 7.•.".:' ti rs• . rt.,-: 441)CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 7, 1984 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. JAMES H. BUDD Application for approval to short plat 0.71 acres of property into three (3) lots (file short plat 071-84) and approval of a waiver of off-site improvements (file W-072-84); property located at 1402 N. 36th Street. LARRY M. BROWN Application to rezone 0.72 acre of property from G-i to L-1, file R-077-84; located on the north and south sides of S.W. Grady Way at the 1303 block, between Oaksdale Avenue S.W. and Longacres Drive S.W. FRANK FISCHER Application to rezone 0.14 acre of property from R-3 to B-1 to allow a future beauty shop to be located on the subject property, file R-076-84; located at 426 Burnett Avenue South. S 1110 THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT o 235-2552 n =MOM MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 O 90 co O P 9 14'3 SEP1° s° BARBARA Y. SHINPOOH M E M 0 H A_ N DU M MAYOR DATE: July 17, 1984 TO: Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator FROM: Gene N. Williams,-Associate Planner SUBJEC T: Fischer Rezone The Pclicy Development Department would like to offer the following comments concerning the Fischer rezone as an expansion of our notes on the comment sheet. The subject property is located in a transition area between the Commercial and Medium Density Multiple Family designations on the Land Use Element Map. The potential for either ise exists; therefore, other policies or facts must be used to determine the appropriateness of the request. Two questions seen pertinent. Where/how should a transition from commercial uses to residential be provided? What intensity of development is appropriate? Currently, the VFW Hall, located directly to the north, is a large barrier marking the southeri edge of commercial uses along Burnett Avenue S. Commercial use south of the VFW would seem like a leap past this barrier. However, the VFW -- though not a retail use -- must have significant impact to the single family home on the subject property. A municiral parking lot is located in front of the site. Therefore, some means of stepping down tie intensity from the VFW to the residential uses south of the site might be appropriate. The intensity of potential uses in a B-1 zone on the subject site is a concern. Retail uses, taverns high volume sales, extensive signage or any large customer or employee generator would not be appropriate. Likewise, a large scale building would not serve as an effective transition. The proposal presented by the applicant appears to alleviate these concerns, but the applicants intentions must be enforced by covenant or appropriate conditions. Approval of B-1 zoning on the subject site should be restricted to non-retail service uses like a beauty shop or other quite similar use. Furthermore, the property should he restricted to use of the existing structure or a structure of a similar nature and scale to residential uses. The amount and type of signage should also be limited to that compat.ble with the presence of adjoining residential uses. Roger Elaylock July 17, 1984 Page 2 In summary, this department recommends approval of the request with restrictive covenants to limit the uses and intensity as discussed above. We believe this will provide improved economic potential for downtown Renton while protecting residential uses from most impacts of commercial uses. Also, this recommendation would allow a reasoned future decision to be made about development on the adjoining vacant property to the south. S. S. OF R4-,'t/ v. -7kfi ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT e . ' RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9p co- 09gTED SE O BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYJR July 18, 1984 John J. Cuintinskie 426 Burnett Avenue South Renton, nA 98055 Re: R ozone Application, File R-076•-84; Property Located at 426 Burnett Avenue South. Dear Mr. Quintinskie: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on June 26, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for August 7, 1984. The public hearing commen es at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerer', Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JM`.,:c1 1O11Z-2 111. 0 OF R4, A. U 0 .4- Z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Y°"" "RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR p9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O P 917'FD SEf'j e BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYCR July 18, 1984 Frank Fisher 723 Rainier Avenue South Renton, VIA 98055 Re: Rezone Application, File R-076-84; Property Located at 426 Burnett Avenue South. Dear Mr. Fischer: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on June 26, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for August 7, 1984. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hail. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any quest!ons, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely To?te 9 L1 C Roger J. 3laylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMS:ci 1011Z Oil1003Z_ S. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON AUGUST 7, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: L ARRY M. BROWN Application to rezone 0.72 acre of property from G-1 to L-1, file R-077-84; located on the north and south sides of S.W. Grady Way at the 1 S00 block, between Oaksdale Avenue S.W. and Longacres Drive S.W. F RANK FISCHER Application to rezone 0.14 acre of property from R-3 to B-1 to allow a future beauty shop to be located on the subject property, file R-076-84; is cated at 426 Burnett Avenue South. Legal do scriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Departrr ent. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 7, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIOrJS. PUBLISHED : July 27, 1984 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JERRY F. LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary 'ubli ' and for the State of Washington residing in ,e,t-r. on the 27th da f July, 19 4. mi_vy r SIGNED: 7 CAv+,I0L_ 1003-3Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON AUGUST 7, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: LARRY M. BROWN Application to rezone 0.72 acre of property from G-1 to L-1, file R-077-84; located on the north and south sides of S.W. Grady Way at the 13C0 block, between Oaksdale Avenue S.W. and Longacres Drive S.W. FR 4NK FISCHER Application to rezone 0.14 acre of property from R-3 to B-1 to allow a future beauty shop to be located on the subject property, file R-076-84; loc3ted at 426 Burnett Avenue South. JAMES H. BUDD Application for approval to short plat 0.71 acres of property into three (3) lots (file short plat 071-84) and approval of a waiver of off-site improvements (file W-072-84); property located at 1402 N. 36th Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Departme ALL INTE RESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUELIC HEARING ON AUGUST 7, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHE D : July 27, 1984 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director REN1UILDING & ZONING DE ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 073 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON SAID PROPERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATEi: 7/11/84 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ! PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I ( POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M , ON JULY 10, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED Fl APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED G,4/A,U Cow © T QCCc.(7,44() c7, pG ,04U S lic)/GL AD 7 <- l`DATE : 7---,547. SIGNATUR DIRECTOR OR AU HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENUILDING & ZONING DE ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 073 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON SAID PROPERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DAT : 7/11/84 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 1-71 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 11BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I ( POLICE DEPARTMENT I ( POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON JULY 10, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED e. oIe/ yt(2/Vi1/7> i 0/1/ r t f i'e S'S C/J.e e,c;(/il y .4)r G' ie Goo/lam s .a1 os-,1 ila n ems, 6o///7 /-`z'7S h);// rye„,e 7u2 ' '.J,:y /'t /iy 2 r.J;;n o DATE : 7:"...F-# SI NATU OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE l REVISION 5/1982 REN UILDING & ZONING DEPIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 073 - 84 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-076-84) JUN 29 1984 POLICY PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER nFVFIOPMckm ncpr PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON SAID PROPERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH TO : l ! PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATEI: 7/11/84 ENGINEERING DIVISION I ( TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION i ( FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON JULY 10, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED 1 e 5 ive/Allie /4-0 9461:e Ma-ev-J• Air/k/e--veil 0-/d-Leid11-6246/ tzA"P"-frts-trire/ 4 hee-zy ir-e,s40Z-Afrd dreon4f- ed-itew ot-&-z.44eAde)7 1/J/- DaluifILL4-6 kiij 2-91e^-4/)tr-ta 0/ /-ed Ga ct ji 44,40)L4tim.4.41,41,,,e. zkx , • 46± CeQ s 7 7jJ 4. 441ll A I t ' to cf?a- e SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN1UILDING & ZONING DE ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 073 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT ; FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON SAID PROPERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 7/11/84 cl ENGINEERING DIVISION l ( TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT C BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M , ON JULY 10, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I INOTAPPROVED 2/31 DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENT UILDING & ZONING DEPENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 073 84 APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON SAID PROPERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 7/11/84 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION Fl TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT I ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON JULY 10, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : i" ;// / "/ Nc.1 c A' APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EI NOT APPROVED 2eevr r pens.=L1 ci G2z r DATE : 7frSIGNATUREOFDIRECTORORAUTHOK1ZEDREPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENT UILDING & ZONING DEMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 073 •- 84 APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER $EZ_ONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON SAID PROPERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH TO : Ell PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 7/11/84 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I ( PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT I ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON JULY 10, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; eX/rll/ OAPPROVED riAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED I UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJET TO 7O/P4 LATE COMERS AIREEMEN1 • WATER Es GV-5G2 //z 74.1SXS.0 37Z.4- r 131X Z7 LATE COWERS AGREEMENT • SEWER 1-0 GJ N 0 r r AT01`1 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CI ARIE • WATER yh-5 /A- L,4,e4'.E,e,, ,E,e .e. Ubcgz SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEWER s A/0 /f 4 J, Dy COAA4ECTX.13SPECIALASSESSMENTAREACHARGE • WATER A/D SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SEWER A/0 APPROVED WATER PLAN NO APPROVED SEWER PLAN Ai APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT I.00ATIONS C BY FIRE DEPT. J t> FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS 1 VaC?DATE : 7 V0-SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 rm 1Q) RENUILDING & ZONING DE ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 073 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON SAID PROPERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH TO : I 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 7/11/84 El ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU DPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT I ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON JULY 10, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS O NOT APPROVED 4.4_t,4yf DATE : r l SIGN TURE OF DI ECT R OR ' UTHO',IZED REPRESEN ATIVE o REVISION 5/1982 RENT UILDING & ZONING DEPENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 073 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) :REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON SAID PROPERTY, LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH TO : I I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATEi: 7/L1/84 C ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I ( OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON JULY 10, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 7 DK APPROVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ] NOT APPROVED DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 OF Re 1% SEP1 City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON AUGUST i, 1984 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: FILE R-076-84 X REZONE From R-3 TOB-1 SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ro SITE APPROVAL I SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lot ' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM GENERAL LOCATION AND/DR ADDRESS: LOCAILU AT 42( BURNLI I AVENUE SOUTH LEGAL DE SCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIIRONMENTAL DECLARATION SIGNIFICANT NNON-SIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT pRDQEct AL1T11-1fl R IZATION 0457N S FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): R-076-84 EnvironmE ntal Checklist No.:ECF-073-84 Descripticn of Proposal:Application to rezone 0.14 acre of property from R-3 to B-1 to allow a future beauty shop to be located on the subject property. Proponent: Frank Fischer Location of Proposal: Located at 426 Burnett Avenue South. Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proppsal was reviewed by the ERC on July 11, 1984, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Gele Williams, Jerry Lind, Robert Bergstrom, Richard Houghton, Michael Parness, Roger Blaylock, Ronald Nelson, Gary Norris, and James Gray. Incorpora.ed by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-073-84 are the following: 1. En iironmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Frank Fischer, dated June 26, 1984. 2. Applications: Rezone (R-076-84). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities Engineering Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Policy Development Department, Parks and Recreation Department, and the Police Department. Acting a! the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.0`. 0(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environm;ntal checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons 1 or declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject rezone request will not adversely impact the environment. SIGNATURES: oval Nelson Michael Parrlss Building ind Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor Richard I Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: JULY 16, 1984 APPEAL DATE: JULY 30, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 073 - 84 APPLICATION No(s) : REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT: FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE: FISCHER REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. LOCATION: LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH SITE AREA: 6000 SO. FT. BUILDING AREA (Gross) : N/A DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : X 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: X 3) Water & Water Courses : 4) Plant Life:X 5) Animal Life: X 6) Noise: X 7) Light & Glare: X 8) Land Use; North: COMMERCIAL East : MIXED SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI FAMILY South: MIXED SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI FAMILY West : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Land Use Conflicts : POSSIBLE W/RESIDENTIAL TO SOUTH View Obstruction: NONE ANTICIPATED 9) Natural Resources : x 10) Risk of Upset : x 11) Population/Employment : X 12) Number of Dwellings : (1) x 13) Trip Ends ( ITE) ' 25 TRIP ENDS ESTIMATED Traffic Impacts : MINOR 14) Public Services : x 15) Energy:x 16) Utilities : X 17) Human Health: x 18) Aesthetics :x 19) Recreation:x 20) Archeology/History: x Signatures : Ronald G. Nelson P c el Parries Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor PUBLISHED: JULY 16, 1984 Richard C. Hought n APPEAL DATE: JULY 30, 1984 Public Works Director 0454N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-signifi:ance for the following projects: FRANK FISCHER (ECF-073-84) Application to rezone 0.14 acre of property from R-3 to B-1 to allow a future beauty shop to be located on the subject property, file R-076-84; located at 426 Burnett Avenue South. CITY OF RENTON, POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (ECF-074-84) Hor ey Creek Comprehensive Plan Amendment. A study has been prepared to rev:ew inconsistent comprehensive plan designations in the area of the Honey Creek Park plat and adjacent transmission line easement in the northeast qua irant area. The Envi'onmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-signif.cance with conditions for the following projects: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES (ECF-014-84) Application to rezone 48.5 acres of property from G-1 to G-1, R-1, and R-2, file R-014-84, and for approval of a preliminary PUD consisting of a multi-family condominium development having 185 housing units, file PPUD-015-84 . This revised application is to be constructed in two phases. Tho first phase will be 99 units to be located on the south side of Honey Cri:ek; property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. LARRY M. BROWN (ECF-075-84) Application to rezone 0.72 acre of property from G-1 to L-1, file R-077-84; located on the north and south sides of S.W. Grady Way at the 1300 block, bei ween Oaksdale Avenue S.W. and Longacres Drive S.W. Further nformation regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning DepartmE nt, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by July 30, 1984. Publishec: July 16, 1984 NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. R-076-84, FCF-073-84 PROPOSED ACTION AiPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TJ B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP TO BE LOCATED ON THE SUEECT PROPER-Y, GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS LOCATED AT 426 BURNLII AVENUE SOUTH POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:C)0 P.M., ,IUI Y 30. 1984 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PARKS Date circulated : JUNE 28, 1984 Comments due : JULY 10. 1984 ENIVIRONIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 073 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 6,000 S.F. BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR • MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : 't 't. Title : r " e,. Date : FORM: ERC-06 Tivwri . Date circulated : JUNE 28, 1984 Comments due : JULY 10. 1984 ENVIR0NIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 073 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE Brie f Description o f Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 6,000 S.F. BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR • MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : tom" 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : v' 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings :G 13 ) Trip ends ( I T E ) : E .,. c i )7,7 traffic impacts : s. c,.7`%4,,, f 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : t' 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : JUNE 28, 1984 Comments due : JULY 10. 1984 ENVIROINIMEINTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 073 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 6,000 S.F. BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR - MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes :t/ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : t/ 3 ) Water & water courses : t/ 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life :e 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 1/ 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : t/ 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : S d Vet .- c- Ham= 1 pv 1 O Recommendation : DNSI 'v DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : Title : Date : 7/3/e- FORM: ERC-06 pc, 4..c. Date circulated : JUNE 28, 1984 Comments due : JULY 10. 1984 ENIVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 073 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 6,000 S.F. BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR - MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : G litle :et Date : 7-2-23 FORM: ERC-06 I O GN Date circulated : JUNE 28, 1984 Comments due : JULY 10. 1984 EINIVIRONIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 073 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 6,000 S.F. BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : ,_ DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by :* /r / l itle : Date : FORM: ERC-06 rf uT 11.l i','E 5 Date circulated : JUNE 28, 1984 Comments due : JULY 10. 1984 EMIVIRO\I1E\ITAL CHECKLIST REVIEl1 SHEET ECF - 073 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-076-84) PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON THE SUBJECT LAurERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 6,000 S.F. BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) ; N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR - MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : V 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : V' 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : V 7 ) Light & glare : tV 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : V south : V west : y Land use conflicts : View obstruction : r 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : V 11 ) Population/Employment : i/ 12 ) Number of Dwellings :I/ 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : V' 15 ) Energy : tv 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : V 18 ) Aesthetics : t% 19 ) Recreation : l/ l 20 ) Archeology/history : 1/ COMMENTS : 0...Recommendation : DN,gI/1 OS More Information Reviewed by : i-6\-- ,( aul__y : vim 1 itle : (/7/7/fz Ch //i?e'e`i`,I,? Date : 3 /7.0 FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : JUNE 28, 1984 Comments due : JULY 10. 1984 ENIVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 073 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-076-84) SUN 2 7 1g87 PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 6,000 S.F. BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by q./2 1 itle : 215tjJ/ -ei Date : FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : JUNE 28, 1984 Comments due : JULY 10. 1984 U VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 073 - 84 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-076-84)I11111 29 1904 PROPONENT : FRANK FISCHER OFVF p L CY PROJECT TITLE : FISCHER REZONE Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE 0.14 ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-3 TO B-1 TO ALLOW A FUTURE BEAUTY SHOP ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. LOCATION : LOCATED AT 426 BURNETT AVENUE SOUTH. SITE AREA : 6,000 S.F. BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : N/A IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life :1- _ 5 ) Animal life : J 6 ) Noise : t/ 7 ) Light & glare : l n8 ) Land Use ; north : Gf p c/ r dr i q L east : a r lC'i t1' cJ south : PCf- west : Rrhrj Land use conflicts : f View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 4/47 .4. ..eci/ / 6- T traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities :l^ 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation :L 20 ) Archeology/history :lr COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : ( 7 YE /14i1S'Gr7 1 .tle : lt`S5'1514.04' Pet_`c`ter Date : 7//O/ t FORM: ERC-06 1 1 C( CITY OF RENT UN FILE NO(S): f 8 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 4. MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME at FEES 10411 REZONE*(FROM .3 TO i31 ) ,&,„) .ADDRESS r '; !A i N'4L 4 yr • • SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY Its/folk/ ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* r .,ts/fo ryWit 9g05.5" Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE1• 1 SITE PLAN APPROVAL 1 0 6 0' GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT TTTT No. of Cubic Yards: Q VARIANCE CONTACT PERSON From Section: Justificu-ion Required NAME L ANY cisciiS - ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 6 i'1 5. / VLS &ar4.6 O SHORT PLAT 0 TENTATIVE PLAT r t CITY N fTA/ V S . / V/} je 2, Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHON 3 0 r O / El FINAL PLAT T(,," Q WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Ybilw I. 6) %ha-tlprSxfir ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 4 P '0_ e r A .. S.Q PRELIMINARY CITY k fpi r N tt', '. q IP, _ 0 FINAL VU P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 410.05. _ o El Residential Q I-12ustrial iii 11 lit Commercial a Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PRV): "3usri14 VOA S• Q TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRE T SING PRELIMINARY S , • + — ` ED FINAL PROP.-ED USE PARK NAME: 4 0 s. J NUMBER OF SPACES: Ep ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 15 a`3' SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: ' 0 0 0 I TOTAL FEES . 1,P6 a7 STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATiV ?P^CE !NG -- g' . APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: t 1,s4.\C? ti1 G `.---Q k APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: i/1J 2 '" 4 El Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent Oti By: Initials ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: yi APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 0 Accepted Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials SEED TO: Q Building Q Design Eng. r2 Fire bEl Parks tJ Police EJ Policy Dev. i Traffic Eng. tEi Utilities Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). Sinle family dwelling louated on 426 Burnett Avenue South, Renton, King County, Washington, Lot No. 6, Block No. 27, 1 /4 Sec. S E Sec. 18, Township 23 Range OS. 4 AFFIDAVIT 4 Rr,tk Fischer being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner,[]owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS l v th DAY OF --Sun 19 -J . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT K e r'rL) U1 \(1_- i nj 1,/b r.L.:nc3- Name of Notary Public) t oxt+uirauSKOWng ) Authorized Representative cq590() 1a7 t11 a\1 e 2237Rainier Avenue S. Address) Addrecs) Renton, Washington 98055 City) State) (Zip) 255-1064 Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON co t ` (, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM \J JUN 26 1984 DiJII ,.l 6.p T FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. _ - 0 7 - Environmental Checklist No. Cf- 07.5 -gq PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance El Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Q Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires iTl state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent John J. Quintinakie / Frank Fischer 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 255-4940 255-1064 426 Burnett Ave. S. 723 Rainier Ave. S. Renton, Wash. 98055 Renton, Wash. 98055 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Change in zoning to permit operation of beauty shop. 1 4 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : 1\1v14t / FFcc r A 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : scr 7-. / . , / %YY- 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposalfederal , state and local--including rezones) : 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related t or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:4. U 11 . Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes, explain: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed , but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYS NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? YES MAYBE NO c) -Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ES MAYBE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of any Y unique geologic or physical features? YES M YBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the v bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? J YES M YBE NO Explanation : 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? Tr MAYBE b) The creation of objectionable odors? Yry— MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NU— c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NNOd) Change in the amount of surface water in any waterbody? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited totemperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MMA BT f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES M YBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YE MAYS WU— Explanation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? x 1( — M YB WO— W Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? YES MAYBENa-- c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES M YB Explanation: 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles. fish and shellfish, benthic organisms . insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE N5— b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE 0 Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES M YB Explanation: v. 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE 0- Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including , but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) v in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES M YBE Cr Explanation: 11) Populati_on. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population x of an area? YES M YBE U— Explanation: 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? Y YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? Y YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE "NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES RAM- NO Explanation: Initially with 2 operators working expect from 8 to 14 cars per day depending on services performed. Expect this to increase in one to three years to 8 to 10 operators working and vehicular traffic involving 35 to 60 cars. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? YES MAYBE 0 d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? 6_ YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE WU— Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? x YES MAYBE NlO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO 6- k d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MA- YBE NO e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? S M YBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES M YBE NO Explanation: Expect to upgrade exterior appearance in next 3 to 5 years with new roof and painting. 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the y quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full d' osure on my part. Proponent: j s' ned Frank Fischer name printed) City of Renton Building & Zoning Department May, 1983 Form M 176 JUSTIFICATION FOR REZONE The applicant seeks a change of zone from R-3 to B-l. Applicant' s justification in part is based upon the fact that the current R-3 zoning preceded the last comprehensive plan amendment in the area. The subject property falls within the area covered by the "Central Renton Plan. " This comprehensive plan was adopted by Ordinance No. 3712 on March 9 , 1983. The subject property was rezoned by the City of Renton under Ordinance No. 3490 on December 17 , 1980 . At this time , the Property was down-zoned from L-1 to R-3 . The subject property consists of a single family residence located on a standard 50 ' by 120 ' city lot. Adjoining immediately to the north is the parking lot and VFW Hall. To the east of the property lies a strip of blacktopped parking area designed as overflow parking for the downtown business district. Immediately to the south of the subject property is a vacant lot then single family residences to Fifth Avenue. The property immediately to the north and northeast of the subject property is currently zoned and used as B-1 property. North of the VFW Hall is a converted residential structure containing three retail businesses. The structure one door farther 1- 1i; ti, .. ` JUN 26 198 4 -* to the north is a community service type business . On the northeast corner of the block lies the NAPA Auto Parts store. The alley to the east of the subject property is used extensively by the auto parts store , VFW, and other businesses in the area as a business access. To the southeast, the subject property looks on to parking lots and a medical clinic and lab. Applicant' s proposal for use as a B-1 lot is consistent with the current usage in the area and would serve as a buffer between the relative high volume and late hour operation of the VFW and the residential uses to the south. It is applicant' s intention to retain the residential appearance of the building while converting it on the inside for use as a hair styling salon. Such use would maintain the essential residential character and be consistent with surrounding uses. The parking lot located on the public use property to the west was paved in approximately 1982 and has resulted in considerable use since that time as overflow parking for the downtown core. This use detracts from the continued use of the property as a single family residence. Applicant further submits that the property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being sought under the policies and goals set forth in the comprehensive plan. Since the plan is a generalized map of intended future uses and not a precise boundary definition, it is arguable that the sub- ject property in fact lies within the comprehensive plan' s 2- area for B-1 development. Even if this is not the case , it is clear that the site is immediately adjoining such intended use area and that the area is currently being used as B-1 property. The proposed rezone is in line with general goals , objectives, and policies as set forth in the Compendium dated June , 1983 . Specifically, the proposal is consistent with the general economic goal of promoting a sound and diversified economic base. The applicant' s proposed use is a non-polluting, low traffic volume us and one which is non-offensive to the surrounding uses . The proposed use will also serve to provide employment and an added tax base for the City. The proposal is also consistent with the policy of encouraging development in and around the urban core rather than "strip" or fringe area development. The commercial goal of the plan to promote attractive convenient commercial facilities would be served by the requested rezone. Currently, South Fourth is used extensively as an east/west bypass for South Second and particularly for South Third. The subject site is readily accessible from South Fourth and would not attract additional traffic to residential areas. As stated above, the proposed use is consistent with the present actual commercial or professional uses in the surrounding area. Further, any on-site parking could possibly be used as a joint parking facility with surrounding businesses. Such joint parking facilities are encouraged under the policies for commercial development. 3- This proposal is also consistent with the general implementing policies for the central area plan which provide that office uses should be utilized as a transition between residential and commercial/industrial areas. This policy states that where opportunities for adequate size land parcels are available, office uses should be an alter- native to multiple family development. A review of police department records will indicate that a buffer use and zone is desirable between the VFW Hall and residential uses. Applicant' s proposal would provide this buffer with a primarily daytime oriented use leaving the residential uses to the south with a quiet zone between them and the evening use of the VFW Hall. In conclusion, applicant would agree as a condition precedent to any approval of the proposed rezone that the subject property be encumbered with reasonable restrictive covenants limiting development to the proposed non-retail use and that adequate screening and planting be provided along any required parking areas. Respectfully su . tted, F K FISC E on behalf of John J. Quintinskie , Owner 4- 9411111111- TION , ACCOUNT NUMBER KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS - REAL PROPERTY RECORD LOCATION I ACCOUNT NUMB G CIi fir T l(IAvER 1 L 29: 723150 2405 0 slTust18oBURNETT A1E S RENTON 4355 INTINSKIE JOHN J 01331 L 28' I 723150 16C1 CO 1 FOLIO 91056 AREA 031 sue 2 1 Of 1 OL O 91049 --- t/4 SEC SW SEC 1; I 1/4 SEC SE SEC 18 TWN 23 RNG 05 LEGAL DESCRIPTION I 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 6 BLOCK 27 RENTON TOWN OF I LOT 17 Al ASSESSED VALUE TORv SALES HSTORY YEAR LAND NAP TOTAL I j tic DATE 04ANGE NO REASON DATE EXCISE I AMOUNT REMARKS mu LAND 7 v jjr 1 i1 E 11 T rilli 060. 75 7 1.6 1 t ys 1 i s, T 100IVALUELAW 73 I 75 4411• 77 1 im s T REVALUED 76 44t, 81 11 II VV 4 Is T REVALUE 77 1311s8322 %A i.0 5 sii, T REVALUE 85 22 SI II 5 Oa T REVALUE 85 1 94 i i LAND DATA BUILDING DATA LAND DATA _ ZONE ACTUAL L-1 WATERFRONT NO GRADE R1—06+QQM TOTAL ROOMS 7 OPEN PORCH ARIA 160 ZONE ACTUAL i JURISDICTION RENTON LOT VIEW NO YEAR BUILT 1910 DINING YES I JURISDICTIOON LOT SIZE 6000 SO FT FAMILY—DEN—REC NO LOT SIZE LOT WIDTH Q BEDROOMS 4 LOT LOT DEPTHIDTHLOTDEPTH1[[uU NO. OF STORIES 1 BATHS: ULL SEWER AVAILABLE YES FIRST FLOOR AREA 9 4 NONE DET G«RAGE AREA 26Q I SEWERVAIILABLILREGRNDUTILITIESNOGRADE5UNDGRND WATER SYSTEM YES HALF FLOOR AREA 930 HEATED SOURCE 1GAS WATER SYSTEM HEATNEAT SYSTEM FLR WALL I I Taerwcwt ROCA 4.1Y1 rTRITPI Arr NONE FINISHED AREA NONE Nr 4 DAYLIGHT NO CONCRETE AREA NONE 94r1 EXTERIOR BRICK NONE ASPHALT AREA NONE EXTERIOR STONE NONE II I I i--+ \` J pr / i c 1 4 n.r.....--, d- z. I c cc ct 7, 1,:\ t,‘, p 1 03 • / Cr cam., e II,jrr' Waft' al/Willi. row. n Ilir"rvivili ' r)I'0iiiiiiram. i,lio 7.- 844.'M; ice, 1 7=1 I CC i '1 lii_ I I ka' e' r'T'L `2 ( s 1. 1 a I r r:iIA l:11 'M gill g0P4 %C i o sic I ti tip ii 'Ii I IbJ nniir jl'Y'41tt ammo I 11 I : . , . _ 1: egg yg1 lrb `° i ;',-1, 4 JAA..cc* vCL L i.- Prr rar 4lrM6N/Mi . rr S?R 11. .,, I _i.. -_j_'. r 1 ,lip y...•nllr r{{l r ri Lt A , T-14. ,air.R.4 n,. J. :' ern 4r Qi. f Zi1•Jfp 1_ L.- t jn.4,T rivirit: r: •l - Tl 6'4`l ullro'illCa 'r.r:, }' - 3terrar*r-r*h-rt-r. '+*'4 , r e^1+.- JsD.iJ tr^` m r ` r --.zrT-r r1'--'+i-WTWv r = ac'or,tr. 1ev ire a,n 11. .1XL 1 ' k . tir1+ 1L, t ZI -" -__IV,- 4tom. I o ll-._ fit si 3 .._1713• J M1 6C- v f' df31J.^ S 3nv bn Tr: ..t hyyv'o f r. r 1 V' I I M i 'S'/+,+4a} (=4 I'fTj*+i. _ ` 1T _ i I C``-j --- 1 Tj - r ..' "'_ Y l "'` `•cr ' T'" t= ? I t.I N tc R I.', 1 t t. r• i Air i i{t 11.1, e phiriP Poem .TA StatutoryWarren Deod f I THE GRANTOR GEORGE BUTOt, alct' appearing of record as George G. 7?uter, at widc'ar Ifor and in consideration of TIN DOLLARS ($10.001 in hand paid:convey and warrants to JOHII QUINTIAS!(IE and IiARCELLA QUIYTIltSICIE, his wife the toiletries described reel estate.sit.ated in the count, of g te ofWashu,gton Lot 6, Block 27, Town of Renton, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 1 of Plate, page 135, records of King County, Washington. ii r 1 I w . r r I till I". 'at 41 t j . t- t, OALES 1.4/1/43101.11-)1 lb t:at:d thiuo w$ 27th day of Deoenber, 1963. a 1 j A. JY" k r t olital. 4:- I TAT:.' OF WASHINC*t,N, is. Canny of lilt tb,Ibis day WrsonaNy appssr.d before me Oeo:p linter1 ? r to •la tame* to hs tat aaavttwar as..,w,su ... ..ut 244 _etc_t:LI thetete.hiet wti (.M=!1(M M! .., acknowkJged that be sfgpaed the rune as his hee aner volunwy act and Jr., e mos aad purposes thesis mantknsd. GIVEN teat•y bead sad Dacia/rah ibis #71k dsy,i ef, 1163. y / T • 4 • ,"" ` ' I644_- A t- AN3 - / ?6 `i c t•wl frf S S. June 5th, 1984 Mr. Frank Fischer Century 21 - Triumph Realty Inc. 2591' - 111th S. E. Kent, Was'-i ngton 99031 This letter is my authorization for you to file in my behalf, Appplication requesting re-zone of my single family dwelling located at 426 Burnett Ave. S. Renton, Washington, Lot #6, Block #27, from R-3 to B-1, permitting prospective purchasers of this property to operate a beauty salon. All fees will be paved by the prospective purchasers. Signed: John J. Quintinekie C 1.t 9 6- S<: ONE,,,, Ari JUN'2 6 1984 1984 COPYRIGHT BY WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER, INC. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 282-3359 WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER BELIEVES THE INFORMATION BELOW TO BE CORREt.T, BUT DOES NOT WARRANT ITS A(CURACY. THIS INFORMATION IS LEASED FROM AND REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER, INC. tINUANNILEL5JAU118LENCEBRAMBUIEBIIIILLIRALLINNIAQ, l'A. _OLLQ1I1Q!1 723150—RFNTON 1C1WN OF Z GSSW VIEW U ROOM—COUNT— --HOUSE—SQUARF—FOOTAGE-- ME —GARAGES-- H %El P 0 RLET TYPES N T B F D BATH X1 %U %H BASEMENT I T T F R 0 PARCI N A P W R & T BLDG BL T M OEAI S P l D R M1 P M? P A DECK 10 UQ___LQI!@LK 51IU5_9QQBE55___S1Ilt_Q_LQI_511E_Q_E_B_E_Q99QE5_5_586QE_IB_IIBY__I_Q_tl_d_EIli_IQI6L__I__B__E_&@ALIN_L__E_54_E_Si_E!_I_54LIA_L_ 1545 6* 18 520 WILLIAMS AVE S RN 1 6,000SF E L S 1 CABIN 45 1.0 3 2 1 340 ALL 6* 18 520 WILLIAMS AVE S RN 1 6,000SF E L S 1 LO—AV 04 1.08 5 2 1 1 2010 66 34 UFIN ow 1550 7* 18 524 WILLIAMS AVE S RN 1 6,000SF E L S 1 FAIR 10 1 .58 6 4 1 1890 41 19 41 UFIN of 1555 8* 18 528 WILLIAMS AVE S RN 1 6,000SF E L S 1 LO—AV 1.58 6 4 11 2450 40 21 40 UFIN 1 OF 320 560 9* 18 RN 1 6,000SF E L S 565 10* 18 536 1/2 WILLIAMS AVE RN 1 7,080SF E L S 1 LOW 23 1.0 4 2 1 670 ALL 10* 18 5 f1/ 2 WILLIAMS AVE RN 1 7,180SF E L S 1 FAIR 17 1.0 6 4 1 1170 ALL 1570 11* 18 5 5 1/ 6ELLS AVE S RN 1 6,111SF E L S 1 POOR 29 1.0 3 1 1 470 ALL 11* 18 0I 6 5 1/2 WELLS AVE S RN 1 6,• SF E L S LO—AV 10 1.08 5 1 2 2510p 49 51 91% OF157512* 18 3 WELLS AVE S RN 1 6, .SF E L S 1 LO-AV 41 1.08 5 3 1 162Q 50 50 11%240D GW 1580 15* 18 527 WELLS AVE S RN 1 6,010SF E L S 1 AVER 67 1.0 6 3 1 11 1370 ALL 590A ES 1585 14* 18 525 WELLS AVE S RN 1 6,000SF E L S 1 AVER 08 1.58 9 6 1 11 2130 37 43 20 UFIN 7000 or 1590 15* 18 521 WELLS AVE S RN 1 6,101SF E L S 1 LOW 16 1.0 4 2 1 760 ALL EW159516* 18 517 WELLS AVE S RN 1 6,110SF E L S 1 LO—AV 10 1.58 6 4 1 1580 61 24 15 UFIN 2400 OF 40 1600 17* 18 515 WELLS AVE S RN 1 6,000SF E L S 1 LO—AV 04 1.08 6 3 i 1 2200 50 50 UFIN 500D OF160518* 18 507 WELLS AVE S RN 1 6,000SF E L S 1 LO—AV 05 148 5 3 1 2220 50 50 UFIN OF 40 1610 19* 18 505 WE LS AVE S RN 1 6,000SF E L S 1 AVER 05 1.53 7 4 1 1 2500 42 17 42 UFIN OF 1615 20* 18 819 S 5 ST RN 1 2,250SF E L : 1 FAIR 1.5 6 3 1 1 1000 61 39 190C GF 1616 20* 18 501 WELLS AVE S RN 1 3,750SF E l S 1 AVER 30 1.58 5 3 1 2000 39 23 39 UFIN GF16405* 19 RN 1 6,010SF E L S 1645 6* 19 420 WILLIAMS AVE S RN 1 6,100SF E L S 1 FAIR 1.0 5 3 1 970 ALL 1650 7* 19 424 WILLIAMS AVE S RN 1 6,110SF E l S 1 AVER 09 1.58 8 5 1 1 1930 39 40 20 28%410D OH 16 S RN 00 1655 428 WILLIAMS 8* 19 428 WILLIAMS AVE S RN 1 6, 0SF E L S 1 LO—AV 06 1.08 4 2 1 1500 67 33 UFIN 290D GF SF E L S 1 LO—AV 1.5 5 2 1 1 1290 48 52 ER 1665 10* 19 438 WILLIAMS AVE S RN 1 6,000SF E L S 1 LO—AV 25 1.58 7 4 1 1 2500 42 17 42 UFIN 2800 OF167011* 19 431 WELLS AVE S RN 1 6 04*SF E L S 1 LO—AV 05 1.0 5 2 1 1 930 ALL GF 1675 12* 19 427 WELLS AVE S RN 1 6,,YOSF E L S 1 10—AV 02 1.06 8 5 1 1 1860 50 50 48%406D Of 1680 13* 19 445 WELLS AVE S RN 1 6,o.0SF E L S 1 LO—AV 24 1.06 5 3 1 2190 57 43 09%480D OW68514* 19 421 WELLS AVE S RN 3 5,'p1SF E L S 3 AVER 70 .0 10 4 12 2310 57 43 EB 150 4 690 15* 19 419 WELLS AVE S RN 3 6,110SF E L S 3 AVER 78 2.0 10 4 12 2310 57 43 EB 15069516* 19 417 WELLS AVE S RN 3 6,'''SF E L S 3 AVER 78 22.0 10 4 12 2310 57 43 EB 140170017* 19 415 WELLS AVE S RN 1 .l6 *SF E L S 1 FAIR 04 1.5 5 2 1 1 1460 64 36 Of 1710 19* 19 405 WELLS AVE S RN 6 6,***SF E L S 1 LOW 1.0 5 2 1 1 950 ALL Ow19501* 23 102 W11 LIAMS AVE S RN 6 4,`'oSF E L S 1 LO—AV 03 1.58 7 4 1 1 2110 58 19 43 UFIN GF20014* 23 121 123 WELLS AVE S RN 6 6 OSF E L S 2 AVER 39 1.08 4 2 3600 50 50 UFIN 4000 OF ALt2120* 24 101 WILLIAMS AVE S RN 6 5,7 0SF E L S 2 FAIR 29 1.58 1 8 2 2790 54 22 24 UFIN GF 426 BURNETT AVE S RN 7 6,000SF E L S 1 LO—AV 1 1.58 7 4 1 1 2270 41 41 18 UFIN 2600 GW 430 BURNETT AVE S RN 7 6,000SF E L S 1 LO—AV 2 1.08 5 2 1 1 1840 50 QQ UFIN 220D GF24209* 27 434 BURNETT AVE S RN 7 6.000SF E L S 1 LO—AV 2 1.08 4 2 1 2280 50 50 UFIN 1 ?60D OF242510* 7 438 BURNETT AVE S RN 7 6,000SF E L S 1 LO—AV 6 1.58 6 3 1 1 2450 42 17 42 UFIN 1 1800 OF245015* 27 419 WILLIAMS AVE S <N 6,o0oSF E L S 1 LO—AV 1.5 6 3 1 1 141Q 72 28 480D245516* ?7 415 WILLIAMS y1 AVE S- RN 9,011 SF E L S 1 LO-AV Q4 1.5_ / 4 1 1 1580 72 4 1246618* s7 411 WILT AMG A Z ni,i ., 7, ,iC 2 i. 3 i w-Av v6 1.2o 7 3 1 1 i i 2oiv 3 8 ui-i i OF247519* 27 407 WILLIAMS AVE S RN 66 6,'A'I0SF E L S 1 LO—AV 15 1.58 9 6 1 2 195 59 27 14 UFIN OF24851* 28 5Q0 TT AVE S RN ? 6 .NSF E L S 1 FAIR 29 1.08 5 2 1 1 14 50 0 UFIM 31 00 EW24902* D 0044 TT AVE S RN 7 6,' I SF E L S 1 FAIR 02 1.06 4 2 1 11 66 54 UFIN 350I OF2495 * 28 510 BURNETT AVE S RN 7 6,100SF E L S 1 FAIR 07 1.08 4 2 1 125 75 25 UFIN 2900 OF25004* 28 514 BURNETT AVE S RN 7 6,000SF E L S 1 LO—AV 33 1.08 4 1 1480 50 50 16%4100 OF25055* 28 18 BURNETT AVE S RN 7 6,100SF E L S 1 FAIR 23 1.08 4 2 1 1560 50 50 UFIN 3200 Of53010* 28 38 BURNETT AVE S RN 1 6, **SF E L S 1 LO—AV 4 2.08 6 3 1 1 2020 42 17 42 UFIN FB 2 535 11* 28 559 WILLIAMS AVE S RN 1 6,4a•SF E L S 1 FAIR 1.08 4 2 1 1440 50 50 UFIN OF54012* 28 535 WILLIAMS AVE S RN 6,o''SF E L S 1 LO—AV 52 1.0 4 2 1 960 ALL 1 ?30A OF T 7 ENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE r - i _ I Fez o°+ ooes li ff.--......._ eoh off, 021 1.ie 4t'. o< 4 °a o z o ti a17 6 :+ 7 i CI o e ft Ot 4" tt I ft le . 0 r 0 G" i a 12 i!414. e....._rR, I. 1 0:5 ajo let 1 ei 4100* --- f 4 4 „,„ 5% • IlUal , • . I -t___ ,- ( A 6 ,scii ---,„ N 1 .4 .. 16.' r • a J,,,,,,, o • 0 _,,r,.. i i_ k .r 2 to s I i •0' •' A 4 gi eel Pe-41 .--1-1"----tr_., - q ig '1'. a 4 4 1 bf .ao f J or V toi 4 ci t slot t rl I 17 I F If) 1