HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA84-094BEGINNINU
OF FILE
FILE TITLE
PØ9484
ICROFIIMED
t .
t
Y.: r Q $ ,5, e r A m .L.Y'
w
d ; ,
kit `1. `s
s
y
ti y , r-- 'd: ,¢
1
E
if:
t
OfSsommensi
r---_
I
Applicant
ELISA THOMAS
i File No. R-094-84
n,
Project Name same
Property Location No. side S.W. 13th St. and 65 ft.
east of Maple Ave. S.W.
HEARING EXAMINER: Date Hearing: 10/30/84 - Decision: ll/9/84
Recommendation
Approval with signing and recording
1 of Restrictive Covenants
Req./Rec. Date Received Date Response
Appeal - Date Received
Council Approval - Date
Ordinance/Resolution # Date
Mylar to County for Recording
Mylar Recording #
Remarks:
Restrictive Covenants to be recorded prior
to City Council action. Hearing Examiner recommends
approval . No appeals received.
r
ts
t
It
j=
OF RA,.
THE CITY OF RENTON
o
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
a BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR,
0 O CITY CLERK • (206) 235-25000,
9grF0 SEPSE
O
P
April 5, 1985
Elisa Thomas
1815 Mantis Avenue
San Pedro, CA 90732
RE: Thomas Rezone, R-094-84
The referenced rezone request was given final approval by
the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of March 18 , 1985
by adoption of Ordinance No. 3898 . We are enclosing a copy
of the ordinance for your files.
A copy of the recorded restrictive covenants will be sent
to you when returned to us from King County.
If we can be of further assistance to you,, please feel free
to contact our office.
Sincerely,
CITY OF RENTON
Maxine E. Motor
City Clerk
enclosure
cc: Hearing Examiner
Building and Zoning Dept.
1 Oqy-
OF R4,
A.
O THE CITY OF RENTONt$z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
o
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
9A co`
FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235 -2593
09gT
Q SEP
December 27, 1984
Mr. Larry M. Brown
Western Pacific Properties, Inc.
13975 Interurban Avenue South
Seattle, Washington, 98168
RE: File No. R-094-84
Elise Thomas
Dear Mr. Brown:
The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not
been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Prior to submitting this
matter to the City Council, we must have the required Restrictive Covenants, signed and
notarized by all parties, available to us for recordation. When your document has been
received, Ne will transmit this matter to the City Clerk's office to be placed on the City
Council acenda.
You will receive notification of final approval, as well as a copy of the enacting
ordinance, from the City Clerk upon adoption by the City Council.
If further assistance or information is desired, please do not hesitate to contact this
office.
Sincerely,
Fred J. Kaufman
Land Use Hearing Examiner
FJK:dk
0747
cc: City Clerk
N/Builc'ing & Zoning Department
OF R,
l1/
t o THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
orolL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR,
0
CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500
9
TEO SEPI°
1#
April 8 , 1985
y'
Elisa Thomas
1815 Mantis Avenue
San Pedro , CA 90732
RE : Thomas Rezone , R-094-84
The attached restrictive covenants were received from King
County . We are enclosing a copy for your files .
If we can be of further assistance to you, please feel free
to contact our office .
Sincerely,
CITY OF RENTON
Maxine E. Motor
City Clerk
enclosure
OF R4,4
4' 0 THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
oatomil BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH• MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR,
q CITY CLERK • (206) 235-25000 -
Eo SE0E
O
P
April 5, 1985
Elisa Thomas
1815 Mantis Avenue
San Pedro, CA 90732
RE: Thomas Rezone, R-094-84
The referenced rezone request was given final approval by
the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of March 18 , 1985
by adoption of Ordinance No. 3898 . We are enclosing a copy of
the ordinance for your files.
A copy of the recorded restrictive covenants will be sent to
you when returned to us from King County.
If we can be of further assistance to you, please feel free
to contact our office.
Sincerely,
CITY OF RENTON
Maxine E. Motor
City Clerk
cc: Hearing Examiner
Building and Zoning Dept.
enclosure
G-+1
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
Zia
WHEREAS, CHRISTINA M. MIGNACCO is the owner of the following real property in the
City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto.Gd
WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following
ri restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described
q real property.
NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions
and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the
undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows:
CONDITIONS OF COVENANTS RECD F
CPS;.4SL. y::},:}:;:5,[ill
1. The owner of said property shall provide a 20 foot front yard setback together with
10 foot setbacks in each of the remaining yards.
2. The setbacks are to be landscaped in a manner sufficient to screen the adjacent
residential uses from uses on the subject site.
3. All industrial and commercial operations on this property are to be conducted
inside of a building.
4. The site plan for this property is to be reviewed at a public hearing.a5-03-IVLJV..AiD AT REQUEST OF 5 5
0536 D
p OF Tr ::s y` CLERK
7 5 A 0
E At
WA ...98055
DURAT ION
These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any
time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the
covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the
Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further
documentation.
Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal
procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property
owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach.
CO
CI
2 .O
eti
0 CHRISTINA M. MIGNACCOCl
in
GO eit.....L.e1/4114—{7)11—cp_Atz
Pet-c-cl-e.ft, X 2STATEOF
ss.
County of
On this day of 1985, before me personally appeared the person(i) who
J r_____--- •--s_...—_•• •••••a •..•I,.,,,,.,tn.t.,nrl cd(.i inch,'tmAnt. t.n he the freeGeneral)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS. day
f On 2EBIZUARY 07, 1985
State,personally appeared ELISA THOMAS*b gfore me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said
c t
w
I
bi
known to meQtobethepersonwhosename
is
in subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged OFFICIAL SEALthat _ she
executed the same. s DIANE EVANS
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
dt ', NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
i\ `
atd`r LOS ANGELES COUNTY yMycomm. expires MAY 20, 1986
Signat ff ry Public
Notary's
7VE & t/y15
SV0715 11-78
y'typed or printed)
This area for official notarial seal)
EXHIBIT "A"
u • Thy' land referred toofKin in this commitment is located in the countyg, State of Washington, and described as follows :L07'S 31 AND 32 IN BLOCK 17 OF C.ADtITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIVISIONANO. ACCORDING GT THE
RECORDED IN VOLUME 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGI
PN
HNGTON;
CD
C7
O
ri
Cl
M+
w
Renton City Council
3/18/85 Page five
Correspondence
CORRESPONDENCE Letter was read from Richard Grant, Chairman of Board of
Water District Commissioners for Water District No. 90, requesting opening
No. 90 Request of discussion with the City of Renton regarding possible
purchase of water service; construction of emergency interties
that would be of benefit to the City and District; and
establishing a mutually beneficial water service area. MOVED
BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO
UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
OLD BUSINESS Council President Reed presented a report regarding pending
Committee referrals: Utility tax break for senior citizens and history
of the of the matter (referred 10/6/80) ; Metro rates (referred
Whole 4/19/82) ; and Voter's Pamphlet (referred 9/17/84) . The
Referrals Committee has determined that no further action is required
on these items and recommends that they be removed from the
referral list. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Proposed MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REJECT THE
R-1-5 Zone RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND NOT APPROVE THE
Tabled R-1-5 ZONE. Council President Reed spoke against the motion
since he felt that the proposed R-1-5 zone provides an
appropriate buffer to protect single family residential use
of lesser density than any other existing zone. Councilwoman
Keolker felt that the City' s existing Planned Unit Development
PUD) process allows similar development, but provides a
better opportunity to homeowners to monitor surrounding
proposed development. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY MATHEWS, SECONDED
BY REED, COUNCIL TABLE THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED R-1-5 ZONE.
CARRIED.
Utilities Utilities Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report
Committee recommending that the City Council accept sponsorship of
Phase II - Phase II of the Soil Conservation Service' s P-1 Channel
SCS P-1 Channel and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement
for construction and operation of the proposed flood control
channel . The Committee further recommended that the Public
Works Department administer the filling and grading permit
for this phase. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Installation Utilities Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report
of Conduit concurring in the recommendation of the Public Works
Between City Department to accept the low bid of Potelco, Inc. in the
Shops and amount of $189,576.08, including tax, to install the conduit
Municipal between the Municipal Building and the City Shops. The
Building Committee also recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk
be authorized to sign the contract documents. MOVED BY
HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
RECOMMENDATON OF THE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Engineer' s estimate
for the project was $199,215.00.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report
Committee recommending the following ordinances for second ; final reading:
Ordinance #3897 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of
Cullen Rezone property located at 1900 SW 43rd Street from Business Use
R-114-84 District (B-1 ) to Light Industrial District (L-1) (Cullen,
File No. R-114-84) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES,
COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES.
CARRIED.
Ordinance #3898 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of
Thomas Rezone property located on the north side of SW 13th Street and
717744 65 feet east of Maple Avenue SW from Residential District
R-1 ) to Light Industrial District (L-1) for Elisa Thomas,
File No. R-094-84. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES,
COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES.
CARRIED.
ti
WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
MARCH 18, 1985
ORDINANCES
The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second
and final reading:
Cullen Rezone - R-114-84 (1900 S.W. 43rd Street)
Thcmas Rezone - R-094-84 (North side of SW 13th St and 65 ' of Maple Ave SW)
The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first
reading and further recommends suspension of the rules advancing it to second
and final reading:
Fence and Hedge Regulations
Ear C ymer, ai \man
i1 1 1n-rJ
Thomas Trimm
Robe lughes
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 3898
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-1) TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT (L-1) (ELISA THOMAS - R-094-84)
WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of
Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City
of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction
therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned
as Residential District (R-1) ; and
WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification
of said property has been filed with the Building and Zoning Department
on or about September 18 , 1984, which petition was duly referred to
the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and
a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 30 , 1984 ,
and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner
and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Comprehensive
Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all
matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing
in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I : The following described property in the City
of Renton is hereby rezoned to Light Industrial District (L-1) as
hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and
decision of the Hearing Examiner dated November 9 , 1984 ; the Building
1-
and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the
maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning,
to-wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part
hereof as if fully set forth herein.
Said property being located on the North side of
S.W. 13th Street and 65 feet east of Maple Avenue
S.W. )
AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about February 7 , 1985 and recorded
in the office of the Director of Records and Elections, Receiving No.
8503010536 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated
and made a part hereof as if fully set forth.
SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its
passage, approval and five days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 18thday of March, 1985 .
Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 18th day of March, 1985 .
ilriA6M) ,SCApc4C,IiL
Barbara Y'. Shinp Mayor
Approved as to form:
4044144
Lawrence t`. Wa21L1410-4,4141.1
en, City Attorney
Date of Publication: March 22 , 1985.
2-
ORDINANCE NO. 3898
Exhibit "A"
a
LOTS 31 AND 32 IN BLOCK 17 OF C.D. N' SADDITIONTOTHECITYOFSEATTLE, DIVISION NO. 1ARLINGTONACCORDINGGTODENSTHE PLATRECORDEDINVOLUME17OFPLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
ailC)
t..\ 0 17 .6
tawrrgi "PC
ti C •+ its • !. WF?
Wellies um eMLA
Mr air
q C!
R
9! ::
6 a•
N \
1
o JTJ. PAL G \ \ \
rim
r s Q
N
I
Ai ,l
r4 1 tO l.
A.!
Ii 73\ I
III I-I
I CO SW. T TIC- ST. AQ • ' I . •
PIS " NSW
41 I - _
W- l TE 2 PI
ME-
LSE. Q
4 z
T R f) V -.
c4.\--‘'.4. -
psk.,,,, -:,
1 ,
T'..
1
i
J .
M¢\
t 1
w•Y ;00001u.-'-1110 N31$ I ` \
I L.
5 A I L 1 ' l oA"` \
s
Iflf
II Jim)S.a4w a+VILLA) ON-
N°R`"o
Nv
uflll!;IIIUI II 11111111111 '
III -'/
I
Illlllu 1
I
III!IIA-_ IIIIIIIIII II. z AEI : Illlllllll. .I
111N-_ 111111111NIYllllllllp ;$
111:111,:i11111
IIW I 1111111IIIIIIIIGyI pllIIIinliIII NTER',TATEI, 1u 111/IIIIIU 1 lll_
1 Ill`e dIIIIIAIii ;II III j
111111i1 1II II
s
thie •._11111 3•I
tea•a!, 0 t
405 7i1
0.-331;.\...1.,./'...
i,14 3
1 l A 9T `
7\ al lalin mil"
1
1
4
I II111 I11111111111
S
U1J zzWr1VJ1 iiiiiii .im 1
I
I a :c
S I[. SL in
Y
I-
T
Al.,—
N as
T. _
2:17i 1111• f7 1
I
7.7.1:;- I K, '' Illifill UN
t f W
A Q I i _I I N
f' I
9
CITY OF RENTON
w. 'a su.qs _ .. w4av +Q.,.iq 00 71ow CLAIM NO.+c
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
I
T%'224 45QIr
I =I
a i u
1
Li
1 I 0ir t' I zi+ LII
IA
I.i
DESIGNED DAFT FILE NO.
V I [ F DRAWN
if I r I sCALg /••-efleV' ruLLD DOO.c ..off
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
February 25, 1985 Municipal Building
Monday, E :00 p.m. Council Chambers
MINUTES
CALL TO CRDER Mayor Pro Tem John Reed led the Pledge of Allegiance to the
flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
ROLL CALL OF JOHN W. REED, Council President; NANCY L. MATHEWS, THOMAS W.
COUNCIL MEMBERS TRIMM, EARL CLYMER, ROBERT J. HUGHES, KATHY A. KEOLKER,
RICHARD M. STREDICKE.
CITY STAFF DANIEL KELLOGG, Assistant City Attorney; MICHAEL W. PARNESS,
IN ATTENCANCE Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; LT.
CLAUDE EVANS, Police Department.
MINUTE AFPROVAL MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL APPROVE THE
MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 11 , 1985 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. Councilman
Stredicke questioned distribution of Council minutes to public
prior to Council adoption.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Lewis Fote, 207 North Williams, President of the Committee for
Petition for Kids, presented a petition containing the signatures of 55
North Renton North Renton children. The petition requested that a portion
Playground of the newly developed community patch at N. First Street and
Former City Williams Avenue S. be made into a children ' s playground.
Shop Site) MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS
PETITION TO THE PARK BOARD. CARRIED.
CONSENT .GENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which
follows the listing:
Mobile Hcme Building & Zoning Department requested modification of the
Park Ordinance Mobile Home Park Ordinance to add front yard setback provisions
to Section 4-2005(A) (7) and delete Section 4-2006 (Licenses)
and Section 4-2009 (Registration of Occupants) since these
provisions are antiquated. Refer to Planning and Development
Committee.
Setback Building & Zoning Department requested revision to
Parking Section 4-748(C) (5) , Conditional Use Criteria, which allows
no parking in setback areas ; current requirement appears
unnecessary, and can restrict or prevent projects which are
reasonable and meet all other criteria for approval . Refer
to Planning & Development Committee.
Residential
Building & Zoning Department requested modification ofSideyard
sideyard setback requirements in General (G-1 ) , Residential
Setback
Single Familyy (R-1 ) , and Residential Two Family (R-2) Zones
from six feet (adopted in 1982) to five feet to conform with
pre-existing residential setbacks. Refer to Planning and
Development Committee.
Recyclinc Building & Zoning Department requested modification of Zoning
Facilities Code to provide reasonable regulation of recycling facilities
and keep pace with current recycling industry technology.
Refer to Planning and Development Committee.
Cul -de-Sac Building & Zoning Department requested correction to
Radius Subdivision Ordinance Section 9-1108 (23) (A) (7) to delete
reference to minimum right-of-way radius of 45 feet in
residential cul -de-sacs in conflict with Section 9-1108(7)
which requires not less than 55 feet. Refer to Planning
and Development Committee.
Bids for City Clerk reported bid opening 2/20/85 for Telemetry and
Telemetry & Power Conduit (Water Project No. 730) ; 3 bids; Engineer ' s
Power Corduit estimate: $199,215.00. Refer to Utilities Committee.
Renton City Council
2/25/85 Page two
Consent Agenda continued
Duncan Claim Claim for damages in the amount of $2,400.00 plus tax filed
for Damages by Donald H. Duncan, 2815 Mountain View Avenue N. , for
CL 01-85 undermining of foundation and cement floor of two-story
shop/garage allegedly caused by water from a faulty water
main installation (8/84 to present) . Refer to City Attorney
and insurance service.
Bidon Claim Claim for damages in the amount of $640.98 filed by Edward G.
for Damages Bidon, 2746 NE 24th, for recovery of NSF payroll check issued
CL 04-85 by Kris Contracting, a subcontractor for West Hill Pipeline
Project, CAG 051-84 (11/9/84) . Refer to City Attorney and
insurance company.
Hunter Claim Claim for damages in the amount of $119.53 filed by William R.
for Damages Hunter, 22655-156th SE, Kent, for tire and wheel damage
CL 05-85 allegedly caused by improperly marked and placed curbing near
intersection of 3rd and Burnett (1/7/85) . Refer to City
Attorney and insurance service.
Kessler Claim Claim for damages in the amount of $236.00 plus tax filed by
for Damages Lavina Kessler, 310 Pelly Avenue North, for fence damage
CL 06-85 allegedly caused by City equipment (1/85) . Refer to City
Attorney and insurance service.
Joint Fire Fire Department requested review of proposal by Matrix
Training Site Management Group to perform a feasibility study for joint
training site with cities of Renton, Kent and Tukwila;
Renton' s share of cost for study approved in 1985 budget.
Refer to Public Safety Committee.
jhomas Rezone Hearing Examiner recommended approval with restrictive covenants
R-094-84 of Elisa Thomas Rezone, R-094-84, 0. 134 acres of property from
R-1 (Single Family Residential) to L-1 (Light Industry)
located on the north side of SW 13th Street and 65 feet east
of Maple Avenue SW. Refer to Ways and Means Committee.
Honey Creek Public Works Department requested authorization to proceed
Sewer Interceptor with condemnation action on two parcels remaining to allow
Condemnation completion of Honey Creek Sewer Interceptor Project in 1985
and permit the Glencoe/Sunset area sewer moratorium to be
lifted. Refer to Utilities Committee.
SCS P-1 Public Works Department requested review of draft resolution
Channel to provide for local sponsorship by Renton of Soil Conservation
Agreement Service offer to build Phase II of P-1 Channel from SW 7th
Street to SW 6th Street during 1985-1986; City to provide
easements and permits, and accept maintenance and operation
of the Channel . Refer to Utilities Committee.
MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE Letter from law firm of Perkins, Coie, Stone, Olsen & Williams,
King County bond counsel in connection with issuance of King County
Economic Economic Enterprise Corporation Industrial Development Revenue
Enterprise Corp. Bonds for the Corr-Pro Associates Project, requested Council
Revenue Bonds for approval of the issue and adoption of the resolution. MOVED
Corr-Pro Associates BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, REFER THIS MATTER TO
WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK. CARRIED.
King County Letter from law firm of Perkins, Coie, Stone, Olsen & Williams,
Economic bond counsel in connection with issuance of King County
Enterprise Corp. Economic Enterprise Corporation Industrial Development Revenue
Revenue Bonds for Bonds for Mystic Ltd. Project, requested Council approval of
Mystic Ltd. Project the issue and adoption of the resolution. MOVED BY CLYMER,
SECONDED BY HUGHES, REFER THIS MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS
COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK. CARRIED.
American Cancer Letter was read from American Cancer Society inviting
Society Campaign participation in its annual Residential Campaign to request
contributions and provide educational information. Car
washes at all Shakey Pizza Parlors (exception - Fairwood)
in South King County will kick off the event from 11-3 on
Renton : ity Council
3/4/85 Page six
Ordinances and Resolutions continued
Street location MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
continued ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinani:e #3895 An ordinance was read authorizing the acquisition of certain
Honey Creek property and property rights by eminent domain providing for
Sewer Inteceptor the payment thereof; authorizing the City Attorney to prepare
Condemnation a petition for condemnation in the Superior Court in and for the
County of King and for the prosecution thereof for the
acquisition of such property and property rights for the
Honey Creek Interceptor Project. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY
STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL:
ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented the following
ordinances for first reading:
Issuance of An ordinance was read providing for the issuance of $2,600,000
Water and Sewer par value of Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, 1985, of the City
Revenue Bonds for the purpose of obtaining a part of the funds with which to
1985 pay the cost of carrying out the system or plan of additions
to and betterments and extensions of the waterworks utility
of the City, including the sewerage system as a part thereof,
and providing a required amount for the arts; fixing the date,
form, denomination, maturities, maximum interest rate, terms
and covenants of such bonds; creating a special bond redemption
fund to provide for the payment of the bonds; and providing for
the sale of such bonds. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES,
COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK.
CARRIED.
Thomas Rezone An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of
R-094-84 property located on the north side of SW 13th Street and 65
feet east of Maple Avenue SW from Single Family Residential
District (R-1 ) to Light Industrial District (L-1 ) for Elise
Thomas, File No. R-094-84. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY
HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR
ONE WEEK. CARRIED.
Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented the
following resolutions for reading and adoption:
Resoluticn #2592 A resolution was read providing transfer of funds in the amount
Fund Trarsfer for of 5300,000.00 from Cumulative Reserve Fund No. 3665 (Utility
Water & Sewer Connection Charges) unto Water and Sewer Construction Fund for
Capital Improvement Water and Sewer Capital Improvement Projects. MOVED BY CLYMER,
Projects SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
See Consent Agenda, page 4. )
Resolution #2593 A resolution was read authorizing entry into the Green River
Green River Management Agreement with the Cities of Auburn, Kent , and
Management Tukwila and the County of King for the Green River Basin Program.
Agreement MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION
AS READ AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE
AGREEMENT. CARRIED.
Resolution #2594 A resolution was read providing for the transfer of funds for
Fund Transfer for Green River Management Agreement in the amount of 531 ,200.00
Green River from Contingency Fund Ending Fund Balance unto Public Works
Management Administration Current Fund. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY
Agreement HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution #2595 A resolution was read approving Resolution No. 84-20 of King
King County County Economic Enterprise Corporation to issue bonds in an
Economic Enterprise aggregate principal amount not to exceed $5,000,000 to
Corporation Bond finance industrial development facilities for Mystic, Ltd.
Issuance for in the City of Renton. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES,
Mystic, Lid.COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution #2596 A resolution was read approving Resolution No. 84-19 of King
King County County Economic Enterprise Corporation to issue bonds in an
Economic Enterprise aggregate principal amount not to exceed 53,000,000 to
Corporation Bond finance industrial development facilities for Hans Koch to
Issuance for Corr-Pro Associates in the City of Renton. MOVED BY CLYMER,
Corr-Pro Assoc. SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ.
CARRIED.
WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
MARCH 4, 1985
ORDIVANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
The lays and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second
and final reading:
Fenton School District #403 Street Vacation Request - 01 -84 (East side of
Kirkland Ave NE adjacent to RVTI campus)
Condemnation for Honey Creek Sewer Interceptor Project
The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first
reading:
Witter and Sewer Revenue Bonds
E isa Thomas Rezone R-094-84 (North side of SW 13th Street and 65 ' of
Maple Ave. SW)
The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for reading
and adoption:
Transfer of Funds for Water and Sewer Capital Improvement Projects
Aithorizing Entry into the Green River Management Agreement
Transfer of Funds for Green River Management Agreement
Industrial Revenue Bond - Mystic, Ltd.
Industrial Revenue Bond —Corr-Pro Projects
Earl Clymer, Chal an
n %Lc vyv r,
Tom Trim
Rob Hughes '
For Use By City Clerk's Office Only
A. I . # L.-
AGENDA ITEM
RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SUBMITTING
Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. HEARING EXAMINER For Agenda Of February 25, 1985
Meeting Date)
Staff Contact FRED J . KAUFMAN
Name) Agenda Status:
Og0G- /IL
SUBJECT: Elisa Tho as - Rezone 0. 134 acre Consent X
from R- 1 to L-1 for future office or office/ Public Hearing
warehouse use . Located No. side S.W. 13th St.
Correspondence
Ordinance/Resolution Ord.
and 65 feet east of Maple Ave. S.W. Old Business
Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach
New Business
Study Session
A. See yellow file
Other
B.
C.
Approval :
Legal Dept. Yes No N/A
COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to Ways Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A
and Means Committee. Other Clearance
FISCAL IMPACT:
Amount Appropriation-Expenditure Reluired $
Budgeted $ Transfer Required $
SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation)
Attaci additional pages if necessary. )
Hearing Examiner heard on 10/30/84, Decision rendered 11/9/84. Before Council
hearing , Restrictive Covenants need to be recorded.
No appeals received. Hearing Examiner recommends approval .
PARTIES OF REC)RD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED:
see rep)rt.
SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION.
TO: Poae r avl ock , ,vn.ing Administrator DATE:
FROM: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
SUBJECT: Flisa Thorns • ','zono
Please furnish the following to the City Clerk's Office:
Certification of Posting Legal Description
Certification of Valid Petition Map
Deed Pro Rata Share of Costs
Easement Restrictive Covenants
X Verify Content
THANK YOU! Requested by:
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
WHEREAS, CHRISTINA M. MIGNACCO is the owner of the following real property in the
City of Fenton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto.
WI--EREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following
restricth'e covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described
real property.
NON, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions
and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the
undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows:
CONDITIONS OF COVENANTS
1. Tl-e owner of said property shall provide a 20 foot front yard setback together with
10 fopt setbacks in each of the remaining yards.
2. The setbacks are to be landscaped in a manner sufficient to screen the adjacent
residential uses from uses on the subject site.
3. All industrial and commercial operations on this property are to be conducted
inside of a building.
4. The site plan.for this property is to be reviewed at a public hearing.
r
DURAT ION
These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any
time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants. the portion of the
covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the
Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further
documentation.
Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal
procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property
owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach.
i •
CHRISTINA M. M1GNACCO
1..---6-41—eit-e/Y"(--a-At."
STATE OF
ss.
County of
On this day of 1985, before me personally appeared the person(S) who
free
General)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES
SS. day
On FEBRUARY 07, 1985
b fore me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said
State,personally appeared ***ELISA THOMAS**
w t
w
Jcnown to me
Q to be the person whose name
is
uu)) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged l OFFICIAL SEAL
she
DIANE EVANSthat _ executed the same. g
W-a 4 NOTARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNIA
WITNESS my hand and official seal. 1,,!'LOS ANGELES COUNTY
4>L- ' My comm, expires MAY 20, 1986
aaa/ntatfNV)------49tureo1fNotary Public
Sv0715 1 78 Notary's Name (typed or printed)This area for official notarial welt
EXHIBIT "A"
f' 4 .
The land referred to in this commitment is locatedofKing, State of Washington, and described as follows:
county
LOTS 31 AND 32 IN BLOCK 17 OF C.ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIVISIONANO. 1A ACCORDING GTODTHE PLAT
RECORDED IN VOLUME 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
OF .RFC
t4)
t 0 THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 0 LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
90 o-
FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593
94,
SEP
January 1 E, 1985
Mr. Larry ul. Brown
Western P.3cific Properties, Inc.
13975 Interurban Avenue South
Seattle, Washington, 98168
Re: Rezone #094-84
Elise Thomas
Dear Mr. Brown:
As a condition of approval for the above referenced rezone there were to be some
Restrictive Covenants drawn for the subject property.
We have had no response from you since our letter to you of December 27, 1984 requesting
that covenants be drawn, notarized and forwarded to us so we could place this matter
before they City Council. Attached you will Find a copy of the suggested covenants for
this property. Will you please have them executed, notarized, and returned to this office
so we may proceed with this rezone request. We would appreciate your attention to this
matter.
Sincerely,
FRED J. KAUF MAN
HEARING EXAMINER/,g((
F JK/dk
Enclosure;
cc: City Clerk
I
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
1r,
WHEREAS, CHRISTINA M. MIGNACCO is the owner of the following real property in the
City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto.
WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following
restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the aboveoe described
real property.
NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions
and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the
undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns as follows:
CONDITIONS OF COVENANTS
1. The owner of said property shall provide a 20 foot front yard setback together with
10 foo: setbacks in each of the remaining yards.
2. Th a setbacks are to be landscaped in a manner sufficient to screen the adjacent
resideftial uses from uses on the subject site.
3. Al. industrial and commercial operations on this property are to be conducted
inside of a building.
4. The site plan for this property is to be reviewed at a public hearing.
DURA-IION
These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any
time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the
covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the
Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further
docurientation.
Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal
procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property
owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach.
CHRISTINA M. MIGNACCO
STATE Or
ss.
County of
On :his day of 1985, before me personally appeared the person(s) who
executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free
and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day
and year cirst above written.
Notary Public in and for the State of residing at
4.
The land referred to in this commitment is located in the countyofKing, State of Washington, and described as follows :
LOTS 31 ANL 32 IN BLOCK 17 OF C. D. HILLMAN'S EARLINGTON GARDENSADDITIONTOTHECITYOFSEATTLE, DIVISION NO. 1 ACCORDING TO THE PLATRECORDEDINVOLUME17OFPLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTYWASSHINGTON;
EXHIBIT ''A''
OF RA,
aI ' ` ,,. o THE CITY OF RENTON
U ` ,'7t. Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
m
o
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
9A co'
FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235 -2593
O9q,
D SEPS
O
P
December 27, 1984
Mr. Larry M. Brown
Western Pacific Properties, Inc.
13975 Interurban Avenue South
Seattle, V1 ashington, 98168
RE: File No. R-094-84
Elise Thomas
Dear Mr. 3rown:
The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request has not
been appE°aled within the time period established by ordinance. Prior to submitting this
matter to the City Council, we must have the required Restrictive Covenants, signed and
notarized by all parties, available to us for recordation. When your document has been
received, we will transmit this matter to the City Clerk's office to be placed on the City
Council alenda.
You will receive notification of final approval, as well as a copy of the enacting
ordinance, from the City Clerk upon adoption by the City Council.
If further assistance or information is desired, please do not hesitate to contact this
office.
Sincerely
I
Fred J. Koufman
Land Use Hearing Examiner
FJK:dk
0747
cc: city+ Clerk
Bui;ding & Zoning Department
OF R4,4
xy. r ° THE CITY OF RENTON
i -, z
ameeCd MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
0
k;, o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
Co
FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235 -2593O9
TFC S E P';
4O
P
November 26, 1984
Mr. Larry M. Brown
Western Pacific Properties, Inc.
13975 Interurban Avenue South
Seattle, Washington, 98168
Re: Elif.a Thomas Rezone
Request for Reconsideration
Dear Mr. E3rown:
I have reviewed your letter of November 15, 1984 and my response follows.
While this office recommended that the subject site be reclassified per your request, it
should be obvious that the result was not easily arrived at by this office. The property is
entirely surrounded by property zoned for single family uses and the impact of industrial
development, while contemplated by the Comprehensive Plan, will undoubtedly have an
adverse e lect on surrounding single family uses. Under the circumstances the buffers
required s could be landscaped and not converted to parking areas.
While oth,3r rezones have had variations on the setback theme, each was tailored to the
surroundirgs. Here the surroundings are still clearly residential, and while the vicinity
may be in transition, the immediate three block area is almost exclusively single family in
character. Permitting an industrial use in the heart of the area may hasten the transition,
but the existing uses must still be protected. There is no need to unduly intrude or
degrade tie quality of life for your abutting neighbors. The rezone, while recommended
for approval, should still be mitigated to the fullest extent possible. The setbacks
provided, iopefully, would accomplish this purpose.
The setbacks are also necessary to provide some fidelity to the goals of the
Comprehensive Plan regarding areas designated for manufacturing park, that is, a park
like setting with landscaped setbacks between adjacent uses. The area should not be
wall-to-vt all warehouses even if the lots are small, but setbacks should be observed.
If this office can be of further assistance do not hesitate to call. The appeal period has
been extended to expire fourteen days from the date of this letter.
Sincerely
FRED J.F MAN
LAND USI_ HEARING EXAMINER
FJK/dk
cc: MayDr Shinpoch
Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
Larry Springer, Policy Development Director
Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director
Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
r`z
WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC.
Commercial Brokerage Company
November 15 , 1984
Mr. Fred J. Kaufman
Land Use Hearing Examiner
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue
Renton, Washington 98055
RE: Elisa Thomas
File Number R-094-84
Dear Mr. Kaufman:
This letter is a request for either clarification or
reconsideration of your recommendation dated November 9 ,
1984 on the above rezone . Specifically, the questions I
would like clarified are as follows:
1 ) With respect to set-backs, the question is whether or
not the entire set-back area will be required for
landscaping or if a portion of the set-backs may be used
for parking? Specifically we would prefer, in the front
yard set-back , a 20 foot area with approximately 10 feet
landscaped and 10 feet available for parking . The side
and rear yards with a 10 foot set-back and a 5 foot area
reserved for parking or possibly further landscaping.
This approach would be consistent with other
recommendations made in the past in the Earlington-light
industrial area and with building permits issued by the
City.
2) In the event that property on either side, that is on
the east or west side of this property , should be
acquired sometime in the future, will the restrictive
covenants , with respect to side yard set-backs be
automatically dropped from the record?
3) If property on either side of this property were rezoned
to light industrial , would the side yard set-back
requirement be dropped?
We would hope that with these clarifications , there would
not be a necessity to appeal the recommendation made to the
13975 Interurban Avenue South • Seattle,Washington 98168 • (`(16) 241-1616
City Council . As you know , every foot of property made
available for a development becomes very crucial when you
compare it to the total amount of property acquired and
ultimately developed by the owner.
Thank you for your time and either reconsideration or
clarification of this issue.
Best regards ,
WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC.
c
Unkj
Larry M. Brown
LB/cb4 .23
RECEIVED
NOV 191984
CITEHEARING REN TON
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON
ss.
County of King
DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn,
upon oath, deposes and states:
That on the 9th day of _ November 1984, affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a
decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of
record in the below entitled application or petition.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 9 day
of 1984.
16, a&die-
Notary bl' in and for the State of Washington,
residing at therein.
Application, Petition, or Case #: R-Q94-84 - Elisa Thomas
The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.)
0125E November 9, 1984
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND DECISION.
APPLICANT: ELISA THOMAS
FILE NO. R-094-84
LOCATION: North side of S.W. 13th Street and 65 feet east of
Maple Avenue S.W.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval to rezone 5,280 sq. ft. (0.134 acre) of
property from R-1 (Residential-Single Family) to L-1
Light Industrial) for future office or
office/warehouse use.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation:
Approval with conditions.
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approved with signing
of Restrictive Covenants.
BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was
DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on October 23, 1984.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department
Report, examining available information on file with
the application, and field checking the property and
surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public
hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on October 30, 1984, at 9:05 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
The following exhibits were entered into the record:
Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application,
information on posting and other documents pertinent
to this proposal.
Exhibit #2 - Assessors Map with subject site outlined
in red.
Exhibit #3 - Site Plan Showing Lot Nos. 31 and 32.
The Hearing Examiner opened the hearing and announced that the hearing scheduled for
today on the Alterra Corporation application will be continued to November 20, 1984.
There being no objections or comments from the audience on the continuance, the hearing
proceeded with the rezone request of Elisa Thomas
Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator was called upon to review the staff report on the
proposed project. He presented background information on the property and stated the
proposal is in general conformance with the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan in
effect at the time of application, but does not specifically comply with the current
Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park. The rezone request seems
appropriate in light of past action taken by the City on other properties in the area. The
site is currently undeveloped and is in an area currently in transition. Adjacent uses
encompass single family residences on both sides of the development, multiple family to
the north, a conditional use to the south along with other single family, vacant land to the
west, single family to the southwest which has recently been rezoned to Light Industrial,
and office complexes to the north. The property is quite small (approximately 5280 sq.
ft.), and will probably not be built without joint development with one of the adjacent
properties. This application was submitted on September 18, 1984, prior to the
implementation of the new Comprehensive Plan on October 17, 1984. Mr. Blaylock
pointed out that the new Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Manufacturing Park
Multiple Option but suggests a non-retail type of activity so as not to generate substantial
additional traffic. Access in the area is not good enough to allow retail uses because the
area is boxed in by S.W. Grady Way and Lind Avenue S.W., and access is very limited.
ELISA THOMAS
R-094-84
November 9, 1984
Page 2
The new zoning classification, when completed, will reflect the intent of the new
Comprehensive Plan, but until that time the L-1 classification would allow commercial
activities.
Mr. Blaylock continued his presentation stating this proposal is in general compliance with
the new Comprehensive Plan and would warrant approval. The multiple options available
to this site were discussed and it was noted that possibilities would include offices, light
industrial uses, but would not include retail sales. Office and light industrial uses have
been suggested by the applicant. The new zoning for the area does establish a 20 ft. front
yard setback, 10 ft. setback for the side yards, and in some cases setbacks for rear yards
depending upon adjacent uses. These setback requirements could be placed on the
property in the form of a restrictive covenant. Timeliness was discussed and it was stated
although this property does not appear to be the next logical parcel for rezone, it is within
200 ft. of property already zoned L-1. Major public improvements in the area such as
water, sewer and storm drainage will have to be brought up to City standards at the time
of development. The departmental comments were reviewed, and it was noted that
specific detailed review of this proposal was suggested at the time of development. Mr.
Blaylock stated because of the surrounding residential uses there should be buffering of
the uses, and it was recommended that the Examiner recommend approval of the rezone
to the City Council subject to the filing of restrictive covenants which would include site
plan approval, a building setback requirement of 20 ft. from S.W. 13th St. and a 10 ft.
landscaped setback from the side and rear property lines as well as a 6 ft. sight-obscuring
fence to be constructed prior to occupancy of any structure built on the site. The site is
located in the midst of single family zoning.
The Hearing Examiner called for testimony from the applicant or their representative.
Responding was:
Larry Brown
13975 Interurban Avenue So.
Seattle, Washington, 98168
Mr. Brown began by stating as the applicant's representative, they are basically in
agreement with the staff report. He referred to the 8 inch sanitary sewer line mentioned
on page 2 of the staff report which was said to be 150 ft. west of the site. Mr. Brown said,
in all reality the line is located 400-450 ft. at the intersection of the alley between 12th
Street and Grady Way & Maple. The development of this property would require a sewer
extension from that point down Maple Street to 13th Street, and across 60 to 70 ft. to the
property line. Referring to a storm water retention/detention system, it is their
understanding that there is a storm water line in Maple Avenue which dumps into a
culvert at I-405, and there is an existing latecomers agreement for that particular service
which should mean that any development within that area would be expected to hook into
that storm water line prior to receiving approvals. For the record, the Hearing Examiner
asked Mr. Brown to clarify the owenership/representation for this proposal. Mr. Brown
stated Elisa Thomas is the applicant; Christina Mignacco is the owner and the mother of
Elisa Thomas. Elisa Thomas has a power-of-attorney for her mother's affairs. Mr.
Brown stated he is representing Mrs. Thomas for a purchaser who has the property under
earnest money subject to receiving the rezone.
Continuing with his testimony, Mr. Brown referred to the improvement of an alley if it is
to be used for access. He stated this is the first project he has been involved in where
there is an alley at the rear of the property that is not improved. He stated it is his
understanding that the developer of this property would be expected to improve the alley
up to the furtherest property line from the street, which would be Maple Avenue. In this
instance it would be approximately 120-130 lin. ft. The Hearing Examiner replied stating
generally it is requested by the Engineering Divisions that the entire alley be paved
because there is no limitation on any one leaving the site going left or right, making it a
problem for the city if the alley becomes a major use for an industrial rather than a
residential property. Mr. Brown stated the alley in reference is a one-way alley (no outlet
to the east), unless it was opened up in the future.
Mr. Brown continued his testimony referencing the staff report, and the setbacks for the
property. This particular property is under the 6,000 sq. ft. total, and if setbacks are
attached in the form of restrictive covenants as recommended, it would mean about 52%
of the property could not be used for building purposes. He suggested a 20 ft. front yard
setback along S.W. 13th St. with 10 ft. being landscaped and 10 ft. being available for
parking; for sideyards he suggested either a 10 ft. setback with 5 ft. landscaped and 5 ft.
ELISA THOMAS
R-094-84
November 9, 1984
Page 3
available for parking, or a 6 ft. side yard setback which amounts to a significant savings in
useable property and provides a park-like atmosphere with a 6 ft. landscaped strip, with a
6 ft. sight-obscuring fence along the residential property lines. A zero setback for the
rear yard was suggested as he stated previous rezones have been permitted to build right
up to the alley, and requested this provision be made available to this proposal. Mr.
Brown reviewed the Benefit District calculations and acknowledged he understood that
this figure could increase as costs go up with future improvments. Mr. Blaylock stated
that the setback requirements could be changed depending upon the type of use for the
property, depending on whether the developer would be suggesting a office use or a light
industrial use which would have an effect on the buffering and screening for adjacent
uses. Mr. Brown said the potential purchaser's first interest would be to develop a
combination office/office warehouse type use. He feels there will be an on-going
rezoning process with some of the adjacent properties. The use of this particular property
will depend upon the new zoning requirements forthcoming from the City.
The Hearing Examiner called for further testimony for or in opposition to this proposal,
there was none. Calling for comments, the Zoning Administrator stated it may be
advisable to use the lesser setbacks but recognize in the site plan approval that the
concern would be over the buffering of the adjacent properties, and place a comment in
the restrictive covenants to that affect also, noting the intent would be to buffer and
create the transition in the smoothest possible way.
There being no further comments from the audience or staff, the hearing was closed at
9:40 A.M.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION:
Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the
following:
FINDINGS:
1.The applicant, Elise Thomas, filed a request for approval of a reclassification of
approximately 0.134 acres (5,280 sq ft) of property from R-1 (Single Family
Residential; Minimum Lot Size - 7,200 sq ft) to L-1 (Light Industrial).
2.The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act
SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other
pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
3.Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C,
1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the
subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), responsible
official.
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. The subject site is located on the north side of S.W. 13th Street approximately 65
feet east of Maple Ave S.W.
6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the
subject site is located as suitable for the development of manufacturing park type
uses but does not mandate such development without consideration of other
policies of the plan. These other policies would include neighboring uses and zoning.
7.The subject site is located in the middle of a multi-block single family zoning
district categorized as R-1.
8. Single family dwellings occupied as residences are located both east and west of
the subject site. The immediately abutting uses east and west are used for single
family dwellings. North of the subject site across an alley is a multi-family
dwelling. South of the subject site are more single family homes. Two blocks
north of the subject site, predominately fronting along Grady Way, are a mixture of
office and residential uses.
9. The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 in April of 1959, as
amended by Ordinances 1756 of the same year, and 1928 adopted in December of
1961. The site was zoned G-6000 automatically upon annexation, a classification
that was changed to R-1, the current classification, upon a consolidation of
residential zoning districts.
ELISA THOMAS
R-094-84
November 9, 1984
Page 4
10. The level site is covered with blackberry bushes and is otherwise undeveloped.
11. The site is northwest of the I-405 interchange at Rainier Ave S. The site is two
blocks south of Grady Way and just over a block east of Lind Ave. The alley north
of the subject site only exits west, as it deadends at I-405.
12. The zoning west of the subject site's R-1 district is L-1, the designation requested
by the applicant. B-1 (Business/Commercial) zoning is located north of the site
along Grady Way, while M-P (Manufacturing Park) zoning is located northwest of
the subject site.
13. A number of small lot rezones have occurred in the vicinity surrounding the subject
site. These rezones have reclassified property to either L-1 or B-1 depending upon
the circumstances, reserving classification to M-P for larger lots which can
provide the spacious setbacks required of manufacturing parks. The imposition of
front yard and other setbacks was based on comparable standards by analogy to the
M-P zone. The most recent was the Brown Rezone (File # R-077-84) along Grady
Way and Anderson/Minietta (R-013-83) north of the subject site.
CONCLUSIONS
1.The proponent of. a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public
interest, will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, is in
compliance with at least one of the three criteria found in Section 4-3010, which
provides in part that:
a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or
land use analysis; or
b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the
Comprehensive Plan; or
c. There has been a material and substantial change in the circumstances in
the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the
property or area.
The requested reclassification is justified although it will undoubtedly have an impact on
neighboring property.
2. The further utility of the subject site for new residential housing appears poor,
therefore the current zoning is unsuitable. The area has been in transition from
older residential dwellings not unlike those surrounding the subject site to light
industrial and commercial uses. The construction of I-405 has made the area less
suitable for residential purposes and the R-1 classification of the subject site
severely limits development of the subject site.
3.The area is designated for manufacturing park uses and the request for light
industrial zoning approximates that designation but on a smaller scale. The small
size of the subject site makes M-P zoning inappropriate. The setbacks required
would leave almost no area in which to construct a building. The recommendation
of staff is that setbacks similar to those imposed on other recent rezones be
imposed upon the subject site.
4. In the current instance setbacks are all the more necessary along all property lines
since residential uses are located on all sides of the subject site. A twenty foot
setback from the front property line along with 10 foot setbacks along the
remaining property lines appears warranted to protect the old but affordable
housing stock in the immediate area.
5. In addition, landscaping of these setbacks must be accomplished to avoid any
adverse impacts of industrial use in the midst of residential structures. All
functions of any proposed use should also be done within the confines of a building
to maintain some semblance of a residential neighborhood.
6. In order to air any potential concerns or issues regarding conversion of this
relatively small lot to industrial uses, site plan review should be required.
ELISA THOMAS
R-094-84
November 9, 1984
Page 5
7. To conclude, the City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject
site from R-1 to L-1 with the conditions indicated above. While the timing could
be premature, and the effects upon surrounding homes somewhat adverse, the
current zoning appears to deny the owner reasonable development rights and the
request is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from R-1 to L-1
subject to the execution of restrictive convenants requiring:
1.The applicant provide a 20 foot front yard setback together with 10 foot setbacks
in each of the remaining yards.
2. The setbacks be landscaped in a manner sufficient to screen the adjacent
residential uses from uses on the subject site.
3. All industrial and commercial operations shall be conducted inside of a building.
4. Site plan review at a public hearing.
ORDERED THIS 9th day of November, 1984.
ee 1
Fred J. Kauf a
Land Use Hear g Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of November, 1984 to the parties of record:
Larry Brown
13975 Interurban Avenue South
Seattle, Washington, 98168
TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of November, 1984 to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
Gene Williams, Policy Development Department
Members, Renton Planning Commission
Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director
Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Renton Record-Chronicle
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be
filed in writing on or before November 23, 1984. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in
judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the
prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14)
days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific
errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,
take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that
such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting
other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or
purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall.
The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one)
communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a
land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the
proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and
members of the City Council.
All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all
interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to
openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation
of the request by the Court.
The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for
Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council.
L 1 I I
o
f l a1 . r PO L' 1
l
7„ t I Q 1 l _
41/
W I M-f 4
i _-
r . _:•- 1.
I• •1''•• • • E C..%..!.... k...10
r
I
I
IEr 1 II'
1'
wl •
S 1
r
PA-4 Ilu111 1
o
i 1 , dINU I I*_ ' I I P
j
u I
E' ,p' A ,,
A
orle
r 1 I
III' I `' It
4 M,/
I
N
r i;i: .
7... .r' a e P.
NORM 1,E-1' 1 •1 ' j •— i '!
11 io mi . . ii ii r'
I
ialli
IIII; '' 0
II „ i . ' ,,,. I_ 1 \yTER.
15nttt , 1(
ILifr.
1N Ins 1
14 u11 T' - !_ y• I !
I 31:• ..1,Ate ',, `
MI
ate I><ummw 5
T ala ti
1 a L 1_t I 1 I I
s .m
III,FI:IL 01.'-i' u
L-1 ' _N _•_•_
r I• CI ., •I aA
F __ _ a 1. 1 r b
i 16- " 011111"011M11%;\ at
T 4
g '
1.:1 .
St'si a
l_
tp
iiii
G- 1
Q_ — t
t.
1rr
I s3. •
s/
t
I i jar r-
I 0.;;--1-7 li
THOMAS REZONE
R-94-84
APPLICANT ELISA THOMAS TOTAL AREA - 5,820 SQ. FT.
PRIN : IPAL ACCESS S.W. 13TH STREET
EXISTING ZONING R-1, RESIDENTIAL — SINGLE FAMILY
EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED
PROPOSED USE REZONE TO l_-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO ALLOW FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN M—P MANUFACTURING PARK
WAREHOUSE USE
COMMENTS
1124Z
CITY OF RENTON
LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
OCTOBER 30, 1984
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.:
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING
The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the
order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the
Hearing E xaminer.
EL ISA THOMAS
Application to rezone approximately 0.134 acre of property from R-1 to
L 1 for future office or office/warehouse use, file R-094-84; located on
th 3 north side of S.W. 13th Street and 65 feet east of Maple Avenue S.W.
ALTERRA CORPORATION
Application for preliminary plat approval to subdivide approximately 51
acres of a 71.16 acre tract into 46 lots for future office/warehouse use
Black River Technology Park), file PP-089-84, and special permit
application for fill and grading of 425,500 cubic yards, file SP-090-84, and
vzriance from Section 9-1108(7)(K) and Section 9-1108(24)(A)(6) to allow a
curl-de-sac length of 2,500 feet, file V-091-84; located in the vicinity of
S.W. 4th Place and Naches Avenue S.W.
1130Z
BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
OCTOBER 30,1984
APPLICANT: ELISA THOMAS
FILE NUMBER: R-094-84
A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The applicant seek approval to rezone 5,280 square feet (0.134 acre) of property
from R-1, Residential - Single Family to L-1, Light Industrial for future office or
office/warehouse use.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner of Record: Christina M. Mignacco
2.Applicant: Elisa Thomas
3. Location:
Vicinity Map Attached) North side of S.W. 13th Street and
65 feet east of Maple Avenue S.W.
4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is
available on file in the Renton
Building & Zoning Department.
5. Size of Property: 5,820 square feet (0.134 acre)
6.Access: S.W. 13th Street
7.Existing Zoning: R-1, Residential - Single Family
8.Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use; R-1, Residential
Single Family; B-1, Business Use;
and L-1, Light Industrial.
9.Comprehensive Land Use Plan:Manufacturing Park
10. Notification: The applicant was notified in
writing of the hearing date. Notice
was properly published in the Daily
Record Chronicle on October 19,
1984, and posted in three places on
or near the site as required by city
ordinance on October 19, 1984.
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The subject site was annexed into the City of Renton by Ordinance #1745 of April
14 1959, which was later corrected by Ordinance #1756 of May 19, 1959 and
Ordinance #1928 of December 12, 1961. The property, upon annexation, was zoned
G-6000. This zoning designation was later changed to R-1, Residential - Single
Family, with the adoption of the new zoning map which combined several single
family designations into one classification. The zoning map was adopted by
Ordinance #3634 of June 13, 1982.
D. PI-YSICAL BACKGROUND:
1.Topography: The subject site is relatively flat.
PRELIMINARY REPORT TC IE HEARING EXAMINER
ELISA THOMAS: R-094-84
OCTOBER 30, 1984
PAGE 2
2. Soils: Urban Land (Ur). This soil has been modified by disturbance of the
natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to
accommodate large industrial and housing installations. The erosion hazard is
slight to moderate. No capability or woodland classification.
3.Vegetation: The subject site is covered with a thick growth of blackberry
brambles.
4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides some suitable habitat for birds and
small animals.
5. Water: No water was observed on the subject site.
6.Land Use: The subject site is currently undeveloped.
E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
The subject site is surrounded by single family residences to the east, south and
west and a mixture of offices and single family residences to the north.
F. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1.Utilities:
a. Water: A 12-inch water line is located along Maple Avenue S.W. and a
6-inch water line is locatred along S.W. 13th Street.
b. Sewer: An 8-inch sanitary sewer line is located approximately 150 feet
west of the subject site.
c. Storm Water Drainage: The applicant is required to provide a storm
water retention/detention system.
2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance
requirements.
3.Transit: METRO Transit Routes #912 operates along S.W. Grady Way near
the subject site.
4. Schools:
a. Elementary Schools: Not applicable.
b. Middle Schools: Not applicable.
c. High Schools: Not applicable.
5.Recreation: Not applicable.
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1.Section 4-706, Residential - Single Family (R-l).
2.Section 4-712, Light Industry (L-1).
3.Section 4-744(F)(2), Landscape Requirements - Green River Valley.
H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER
OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT:
1.Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan
Compendium, 1983, p. 31-35.
2.Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Ordinance No. 3050
of October 8, 1984 (effective October 17, 1984).
3.Industrial Goal and Policies, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive
Plan Compendium, 1983, p. 18-19.
4. Section 3014(C), Change of Zone Classification (Rezone).
IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT:
1.Natural Systems: Development of the subject site will remove the
vegetation. Good construction and building practices can mitigate any
negative impacts as a result of construction activities.
PRELIM NARY REPOR ) THE. HEARING EXAMINER
ELISA T -IOMAS: R-091. . .
OCTOBE R 30, 1984
PAGE 3
2.Population/Employment: Minor.
3. Schools: Not applicable.
4. Social: Not applicable.
5.Traffic: There is insufficient information to determine the traffic impact on
nearby roads.
J.ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State
Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21 C, a final declaration of
non-significance was issued on October 3, 1984. by the Environmental Review
C 3mmittee.
K. A aENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1. City of Renton Building & Zoning Department.
2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division.
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division.
4.City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division.
5. City of Renton Police Department.
6. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau.
7.City of Renton Policy Development Department.
8.City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department.
L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1.The applicant, Elisa Thomas, is requesting approval to rezone approximately
5,820 square feet (.134 acre) of property from R-1, Residential - Single
Family to L-1, Light Industry. The applicant has not provided information on
a specific proposal for developing the site but has indicated the site will be
used for future office or office/warehouse use.
2.The Environmental Review Committee issued a final declaration of
non-significance provided the following condition is complied with:
a. The subject property is located within the benefit district for traffic
improvements. An assessment of $2,526.86 shall be due to the City at
the time of building permit issuance.
3.The Land Use Hearing Examiner must review four specific criteria under
Section 4-3014(C) to determine that the circumstances surrounding the
rezone request are adequate to recommend approval of the reclassification.
The following evidence clearly demonstrates the rezone request is
appropriate.
a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject
reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the
time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning.
The subject property was annexed into the City of Renton in 1961 by
Ordinance No. 1928. Both the city-wide Comprehensive Plan adopted
in 1965 and the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1975
clearly show the area's designation for Manufacturing Park activities.
The R-1, Residential - Single Family Zoning designation was applied to
the property in 1982 as a result of combining several single family
residential zones together. The property at the time was zoned
G-6000, a single family zone. There has not been a rezone considered
on the site since the property was annexed into the City.
b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being
requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan
and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is
appropriate.
PRELIMINARY REPORT T( iE HEARING EXAMINER
ELISA THOMAS: R-094-84
OCTOBER 30, 1984
PAGE 4
The proposed rezone request from R-1, Residential - Single Family to
L-1, Light Industry is in general conformance with the Green River
Valley Comprehensive Plan in effect at the time the application was
made to the City. The rezone request does not specifically comply with
the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park for the
subject site. The rezone appears appropriate due to past City actions
on other properties in the Earlington plat area where the subject site is
located.
The City has approved a number of rezones in the general area to both
B-1, Business Use, and L-1, Light Industrial Use, as a result of the
hardship resulting from the strict application of setback requirements
in the Manufacturing Park Zone being applied to the small lots (3,000
square feet) which are typical for the subject area. The large setback
requirements of the Manufacturing Park Zone (front yard of 60 feet and
side and rear yards of 20 feet) would preclude development on the small
lots. As a result, rezones to B-1, Business Use, and L-1, Light
Industrial Use have been allowed together with the imposition of
restrictive covenants establishing minimum setbacks for buildings and a
requirement for landscaping areas. Generally these requirements have
been landscaped setbacks of twenty (20) feet for front yards and a
range of six (6) feet to ten (10) feet for side yards together with a
requirement for site approval (see Anderson/Minetta, R-013-83;
Beckmann, R-060-83; and Swales, R-062-83).
The proposed rezone request appears to be in conformance with the new
Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan which became effective
October 17, 1984 (see Ordinance 3850). The proposed use of the
property for future office or office/warehouse appears to be in keeping
with the land use policy for the area. The new Comprehensive Plan
designates the area as Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option. According
to the land use policies, this is an area intended primarily for Light
Industrial uses with certain compatible heavy industrial, service
commercial and office uses located in a park-like setting of high
operational and environmental standards (see p. 18, Green River
Comprehensive Plan, 1984, Ordinance 3850).
c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the
subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private
development or other circumstances affecting the subject property
have undergone significant and material change.
Since 1975, the property in the general area has been undergoing a
transition from single family residential development and undeveloped
property to commercial and industrial land uses. Development for
several years was generally concentrated along S.W. Grady Way but
during the past three years, uses have been changing in the area south
of S.W. Grady Way, North of I-405, and west of Rainier Avenue S. The
subject site is located within this "new" area of changing land uses.
d. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to
address the question of timeliness.
The subject property, although it does not appear to be the next logical
parcel for rezone, is within 200 feet of property rezoned to L-1, Light
Industrial to the southwest and within 300 feet of property zoned L-1 to
the north. There is a possibility that the site will not be immediately
developed.
In addition, infill of the area is expected to occur within the next five
years. Major public improvements to S.W. Grady Way, Lind Avenue
S.W. and public utilities in the area support the potential for actual
development. Given the general rate of growth of business and
industrial activities in this area, the proposed rezone appears to be
timely.
PRELIMINARY REPOR ) THE HEARING EXAMINER
ELISA T-SOMAS: R-094-04
OCT OBE.R 30, 1984
PAGE 5
4 Various City departments have reviewed the subject proposal. The Parks
Department, Police Department, and the Building Department approved the
proposal without conditions. Policy Development Department, Fire
Prevention Bureau, Engineering Division, Utility Engineering Division, and
Traffic Engineering Division approved the subject proposal subject to the
following conditions:
a. Policy Development Department:
1) Recommended approval subject to restrictive covenants requiring
site plan approval for any future development.
b. Fire Prevention Bureau:
1) Future building development will be required to comply with all
building and fire codes.
c. Engineering Division:
1) Off-site improvements required at time of development.
2) Storm water retention/detention with supporting calculations
required at the time of development.
3) Alley needs to be paved if used for access when property develops.
4) Sanitary sewer extension required.
d. Utility Engineering Division:
1) Sanitary sewer extension required.
2) May need to improve water system depending upon requirements
for fire protection at time of development.
e. Traffic Engineering Division:
1) Development in a benefit district. assessement will be as follows:
43,560 x .134 = 5,837 square feet
5,837 x $0.4329 = $2,526.86 (assessment amount)
2) 1-1/2 PVC conduit required underneath sidewalk terminated each
end in J-20 "B" type junction box per city standard (street
lighting).
3) One street light required per city standard 25' MH, 100 watt
sodium vapor ect.
5.The Earlington Flats area as mentioned above, is an area in transition. The
area now has a variety of land uses ranging from single famiy residences to
commercial and industrial uses. Although the Comprehensive Plan Map
designates the area as Manufacturing Park, there are still several parcels
zoned for single family residential uses. At times, property locations for
proposed projects or land use actions have been located adjacent to single
family residences. The Hearing Examiner, at times, has required both
landscaping and a site obscuring fence as buffer between two dissimilar
zoning districts (see Anderson/Minietta Rezone (file R-013-83). This
requirement has been applied as a means to comply with buffering policies
for industrial and commercial areas as stated in the Policies Element of the
City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium (see Policy 2, p. 19 and
Policy 8, p. 17).
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:
Ba;ed on the above analysis, the Building and Zoning Department recommends
approval of the rezone, file R-094-84, subject to the following conditions:
1.The filing of restrictive covenants requiring:
a. Site approval.
b. Building setback requirements of a twenty (20) foot landscaped setback
from S.W. 13th Street and a ten (10) foot landscaped setback from side
and rear property lines.
PRELIMINARY REPORT TI iE HEARING EXAMINER
ELISA THOMAS: R-094-84
OCTOBER 30, 1984
PAGE 6
2.A six (6) foot solid, sight-obscuring fence should be constructed prior to
occupancy of any structure built on the subject site. This requirement will
not be necessary if, at the time of building construction, the adjacent single
family zoned property has been rezoned to either B-1, Commercial Use or
L-1, Light Industry.
LJ _ B-1
1
s Eft i'11 ' .1 : li
jA •:A 1.• .. ..Fal
1%.
1 /' i
1.- ...i,i
4
t
I Li i M 0,A....
i I I I I
I L i
PY !
I N,I
I I I1 ,II II II I I I1i-y IIII Jr N
L
N III
RtNER t"`
a kLiall IIIII Il M' it ` U r. •I.i.. .'•I• :l-,
iwtL IIpiiI.
as 1•I i l r r
11 I 1 •Q® lIIIIIIIII:rIyfER•
ill Il I •iw1 II,
lin lllll b1111_ ' _ — I w;
Wiz=
1•
I,
I 1 Lk — L.i.: RT F
Li
t MU! !I Illllidl' 'Ill illllll Arli NM t
yVll iNn•!p,I,. 1,,
tt
1 4 --L
eT•
11,-, -
i L• _ 6 a
I
em .
Mt '
I
1 _-_-_-.-:,--
VAArp—
s_54 i.,,__ ::=St-1,Fil w--:
a I R 1
i
IL a HI '' f
11 tIL
r-
THOMAS REZONE
R-94-84
APPLICANT ELISA THOMAS TOTAL AREA - 5,820 SQ. FT.
PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 13TH STREET
EXISTING ZONING R-1, RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE FAMILY
EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED
PROPOSED USE REZONE TO L-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO ALLOW FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN M-P MANUFACTURING PARK
WAREHOUSE USE
COMMENTS
ivI , a fi A (-CO /MA 4° IdE
4,#190d< 11
i22_____
3l 3?
is
H
1
i
A
r•
s.0 30h st
a.
0_ m E
SEP 1 81984
V BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.11
A, 12‘2-->al•i
o,
00
t.
3.
b
0
g.
00.
i.
o
s•
00•.
t
git
i,
o,
ggi-lg_.'.
l••—
9Is:
I.
l•
i.
1i1km.
Y11111111• A.•,.••
e-?..‘•.••••'
P'
a-•••°
vm4M..:.:
1;:
0.
g51e:•?,.-•-•
e
s1\
1,
1Ilffilpail-,tw.
id,.0l.
0A.
i...
iepea1..
441.,
iIl,l-,.i.•d.
041ili
agi1-7
k.
0.-0..
I
ki°gt110°01,
t
i
z,
N.,..
itm.,,,,._
1..
n._
1•.oi,1i111o1 1..1,,,16,,1,
t
1.
4.‘__i,-..
A.
7.*.
g.
i3O...gc.
l.
00.,
g:..•:.?
i05,
og°
g..
i.
gog
g.°
i..gs.
0..
0.,
7os.
g.•
is
00.
i.
o..
i..;..
g—oeo••
mIo,4.01v••
0i,
1•••..
4,-,.
1i
1••
k•,,:
t/•••411b1,
1•••.-••,•
1-•••••"'
r
Li•••:•
e
r;.•
i•,\i
o rt •• • • • •
J
o°o°• 000° oo •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ` • • '
1 °o°ogo'. 1 • •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ••
c•
o ' r111 1'•°°°
o p° • • • • • • • • • • • •
0000'-_000000 0o a • • • • • • • • • •• • • '
t ni
Ij0 :=P
00 0
00g0
I.
r• • • • • • • • • • •
0o°oopoo,y-_ ti4A1'0000 0 n •••••••• •••••••
1 1111WLMOiggg
I
i•_
i.
fff..,:.*.
OOoo'
l.
r' o'o°o,k_- 000 0 00s. . . .I
1•• i1.11'
DOJpgoiog
0 ila ••E;i*• •f(• iiiia 1 0
u•.•
000000•.n6l •
1 0000 0 0000 : —1J 1
1 o0°O O 000°• o
ii '0000 F,Ip1 g0oo A •Oo°o'rJo° °.700000 •Oo00 11.•. I• 1,
u o 0 0 0pp 0 0 0'• epio10000° °p°o°o°000/4,'• mIR lope oir o'r ti 61N 0°000 O 0000000 O°•
SI' 4.:, .00
0o.00_ t 1_ l
t•
000g °000OOOoo°o
Y'{,``'
o' um
ie ,i. ..
1o0.,
00000. E O•
all 1.
1
o, a^:.f•'•
y
4I,'
4vA
l 1::...1 J•0000000 Imoo fY, 117 t I
npl`
t:,•;',
1I h% ; o 0 0 0 0 0 1imwil
i.ZIFIg.Z::,:i.fiCipliiiinN4,:(.1.
4.41.44\' <f.t
1• .
1. .1 • .e .1 0 0 0•Ctipi, ..
t :.fl° ya °''• :
I,.
ao.nntense
L\yr „rAC t 1 inliq' ' ,-'. ,,pA
t+
n
uuu <leeg 5,\
1' y 11 ------ --- •- ate ,e
Amnia
rtelfdiA/i.
ell.
s.'.
0-_4:,-.__ -
f, ,00.111 0000:
f; ,
CIt.'.,(f..,
c.. .._.--:::_:-_-___----_-_--__. •••,:,:„..,,,•,,
r •T --_-- oo°00000 ""• -_--- - i O.-.aa ,
t,.i o00'g..
1 fC`•gt.'• ----- '00000000o•. raj.,. ----- a.S s
1 0000000000 0- _ - II.e- 1 e
r, 00000000o• „!f_, ---_--e `~ Q 1 t v•.`•v.;.' iL'tiY.jc'+~1,. . y-, o0000000000•C''•': =__=-
C.ftv' v,, ,..\'1{.<<
o 000000000000 l t E {\
C
r• ,\ 0000000000• . ,•; f rt.,t; e;it
r, o00000000
000000 u - oga -^//. r ;y<•,50000000•
Q_
44-ofirdA-_,.-; *—...122A., _____ _-_-_-_- _-_-_-_-_- ,ii 111 . vAti 4.„..,..,.::::.;,,: i:i,,.....0 60.
0. ,
z7::.. , ...
la -,a`Ct v1,r+1 ar•<rt:!; o°o000..,'
w, J
0000 ,,. o000000
V
et..'.- 'r 0.00.
1.70000• •I, 00000 00000' o`•
9.,e. .. t^ B000. 0000.
1!':%''. L 000000• 4-tile
t
4f
00000°aN,F, ,tr'Byre r n
0000
It E.
1e . •
1
LAND USE ELEMENTk.
Single Family Commercial
MMMMM•
Low Density Office / Office ParktMultl-Family
t =__= _--JE Medium Density o°o°oo Public/Quasi-PublicMulti-Family 0000.°.
vii
High Densityy} Li ht Industrial
bill°.-
imiu ;: i Multi-Family g
it
t r:1•,.:.
M ?HeavyIndustrialt. Recreation
I fF
r f'•t. Greenbelt Manufacturing Parkt_--___
QNI
ki'. .---I
J
y
T
i
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :r L-d)-(---
APPROVED n I 2OVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED
7
DATE :
SIGNATURE OF' DIRECTOR AUTH RIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIO :
El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
4-6-4-1 ay,stztovit--P(41 41-1,--77-
e-±-,2
d,44:-,tit.4...1/A04,,4,7DATE: A/2*
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR/nR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : .FIcZ E
I (
APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS l lNOT APPROVED
b / 1)7- LJ/L L zc-D TO
AG 4c .v G . .J,o F--E (,O,l:'S
DATE : y - zo _ F`/
SIGNATURE OF D TOR OR P" 7D REPRESENTATIVE
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : i•- z
APPROVED E__ PPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EI NOT APPROVED
t) iyi.f/2„, .. 6,-yie--11).-e--- 64.6.--,-e-/-0.---1--r4-4-$.—.--- g"06....÷...s....e......?4:
z) s--7/7-,r,,.1 t) 4 v- e 1.f..*-4;_.._ w, 54Ar-r I.
f-.,_7(...s.,/...06,0,,,,,,..„, y_ei... ,,,,_.;
le 44x_ 0.... ----74-;ft-e— ey ar/es.c.,/v... ,.,_,,,_,..„.74.
3) /// 1 iQG ,,il,,' Lt- a R- G G -CcS 4.r
p rrio-e-A3 ole.ve-4-- s
54-.41// 51.--"/ Edos,
L-C141'niaA--- R,,(7/ ,.
DATE'
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : T2.&--FF/ G C IVY ! N EtSZ
El APPROVED M APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED
DeeIop).,-tetAi Li-, 2 Be etil S kY, - t,
ASS SSwlec.,`f' k9; It 6e.. -a_s • lk.,w : v.7 560 4/3yi. /kye -.5 S37
5937A 17, 4131-9 = 4r2 5Z6, s6
44$5e55444 u...24
Z , P V C C,,,, d.>r i- .- ',v-c' v/ tti ' F-d - 17 .=. / - d..a-J.1%Lr 3 .,
f e4-4.,,L 7 .!'c:_./ c-a _`l -----.1 i c1 2d> J,'-'f 4, JiLa-L ilt, S kD or
2e-y- C:i / ' 5t -<..-cl:av- / , ( 5 f-k-4,e-4 4,.J 4,741 `,7)
3 , C << S -cc f ,"y<, 7L -x4P c)Le1 r P Cl /xo.--- c/#r s,% R(4-,--ve
Z 5, M t-4• I o r .-- ,,j/ d,a '-,7 ,
i Pi "- `-i--
See C'/A+t Ale rj'1 s'scrf• 1_174L7Ak'gi-7,- DATE: !//LX/
f,gySIGNATUREOFDIRECTORORAUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (h7i_/T / r /GWgEE//JCo
El APPROVED ZAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1: NOT APPROVED
ITT APPN/YAM SUBJECT TI
9` 2G/
E COMERS AGREEMENT - RATER NO
1 COMERS &GREENERY • Still A°
TEM DEVELOPMENT COME • WATER YES . 0.04/so.Fr.
TEN DEVELAPM.DIT C$ SCE • SEER y --S 40.0i/sa.F--.
ECIAL ASSESSMEl1 1.E-• CURE • MAIER A/p
ECIAL &SSESSMENT ASLA CNARCE • SERER /tip
PROVED NAiER FIAA 7 pfpcm's#77.6W40/ Foe &rea'`1
PROVED SEER PLAN YES S,/riE 41XT,Eit/S/oil ,e.g4,V/,FEZ)
PIPED FIRE NTDRANT lDCATIONS
BY FIRE DEPT. ig5 .,—._.._.
RE F1811 ANALYSIS
r 2 63U
DATE: 9/2 7 jr4 11 ff
SIGNATURE OF RECTOR OR AUT"''IZi_. SENTATIVE 1///,
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ;
v/ APPROVED I I , ROVED WITH CONDITIONS I INOT APPROVED
lietKLi)(1-- DATE: 7(2.._ci /R(
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR THORIZED REPRES, NTATIVE
REVISION 8/1982
Form 182
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; fall-Le-
APPROVED F-1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED
DATE : 9-2,-5,(---21,/SIGN4/0/
d ?
DIR OR R A TH RIZED REPRESENTATIVE0U0
REVISION S/1982
Form 182
0535N
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Applicatioi No(s): R-094-84
Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-097-84
Descriptioi of Proposal:Application to rezone
approximately 0.134 acre of
property from R-1 to L-1 for
future office or office/warehouse
use.
Proponent Elise Thomas
Location c f Proposal: Located on the north side of S.W.
13th Street and 65 feet east of
Maple Avenue S.W.
Lead Ager cy: City of Renton Building and
Zoning Department
This prop( sal was reviewed by the ERC on October 3, 1984, following a presentation by
Jerry Linc of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from:
Gene Williams, Gary Norris, Ronald Nelson, James Gray, James Bdurasa, Michael Parness,
Jerry Lint, Richard Houghton, and Robert Bergstrom.
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application
ECF-097-34 are the following:
1.Ern ironmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Larry M. Browh, dated August 13,
19E4.
2.Applications: Rezone (R-094-84).
3. Rel:ommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning
Department, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities
Engineering Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Policy Development Department,
Parks and Recreation Department, and the Police Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not
have a sic nificant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW
43.21 C.03)(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete
environme ntal checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance:
The subjei t rezone will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties and
the following requirement shall be complied with:
1. Thl: subject property is located within the benefit district for traffic
improvements. An assessment of $2,526.86 shall be due to the City at the time of
building permit issuance.
SIGNATU DES:
Ronald G. Nelson Michael P ess
Building znd Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor
Richard C. Houghton
Public Works Director
PUBLISHED: OCTOBER 8, 1984
APPEAL DATE: OCTOBER 22, 1984
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 097 - 84
APPLICATION No(s ) : REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT: LARgY M. BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS
PROJECT TITLE: THOMAS REZONE
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.134 ACRE
OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF MAPLE AVE
S.W
SITE AREA: 0.134 ACRE BUILDING AREA (Gross) : N/A
DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : N/A
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1) Topographic Changes : x
2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: X
3) Water & Water Courses : X
4) Plant Life:
5) Animal Life: X
6) Noise: x
7) Light & Glare: x
8 ) Land Use: North: -
East :
South: -
West :
Land Use Conflicts : COMPLIES WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
View Obstruction: DEPENDS ON SPECIFIC SITE PLANS
9) Natural Resources:
10) Risk of Upset :
11) Population/Employment :
12) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 16 TRIP ENDS ESTIMATF.D
Traffic Impacts: MINOR
14 ) Public Services : x
15) Energy: X
16) Utilities : X
17) Human Health: X
18) Aesthetics : X
19) Recreation: X
20) Archeology/History: X
Signatures :
4Vjar4'cRonaldG. Nelson Michael P
Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant
to the Mayor
PUBLISHED: OCTOBER 8, 1984
Richard C. Hought APPEAL DATE:: ormoRF.R 72, i R4
Public Works Dirr
OF RF
4, v
s', 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
rt,"12 u "t'
RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR
0
m '
rn
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540
9,
0 0-
o9,1,_
S E P t E''AOP
BARBARA Y. ;HINPOCH
MAYOR
October 19, 1984
Elisa Tho nas
1815 Mantis Avenue
San Pedro, CA 90732
Re: RE zone application to allow future office or office/warehouse use, file R-094-84;
property located on the north side of S.W. 13th Street and 65 feet east of Maple
Avenue S.W.
Dear Ms. Thomas:
The Cit) of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on September 18, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton
Land USE Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for October 30, 1984. The public hearing
commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall.
The appl'cant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public
hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have
any quest ions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550.
Sincerely,
L--
Roger`VtJ. Blaylock
Zoning Administrator
RJB:JMh1:c1
1131Z
OF J?F
ti ,}` ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR
0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540
o4/
7-a SEP-rEMO
P
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR
October 19, 1984
Larry Brown
13975 Interurban Avenue S.
Seattle, WA 98168
Re: Rezone application to allow future office or office/warehouse use, file R-094-84;
property located on the north side of S.W. 13th Street and 65 feet east of Maple
Avenue S.W.
Dear Mr. Brown:
The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above
mentionei application on September 18, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton
Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for October 30, 1984. The public hearing
commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall.
The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public
hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have
any quest ions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550.
Sincerely,
Roger J. Blaylock
Zoning Administrator
RJB:JMNI:cl
1131Z-2
REt N BUILDING & ZONING DEI TMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 097 - 84
APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT : LARRY M BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0. 134 ACRE
OF PROPERT` FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION :LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
MAPLE AVENJE S.W.
TO :
n P• UBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 10/3/84
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
n F• IRE PREVENTION BUREAU
r-] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
C P• OLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M ON OCTOBER 2, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
APPROVED 1APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 11NOT APPROVED
i24 26( / • DATE :
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR THORIZED REPRESfNTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REf N BUILDING & ZONING DEI TMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 097 - 84
APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT : LARRY M BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0. 134 ACRE
OF PROPERTI FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION :LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
MAPLE AVENJE S.W.
TO :
I ( P• UBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 10/3/84
l (
ENGINEERING DIVISION
l 1TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
I ( UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
F• IRE PREVENTION BUREAU
11P• ARKS E RECREATION DEPARTMENT
l (
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
El POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS ;
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON OCTOBER 2, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : lale-C-e_
Ri-APPROVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED
Q_ DATE ' 9-2:'1‘ C95C
SIGNA OF DIR OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REr""'N BUILDING & ZONING DEI ITMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 097 - 84
APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT : LARRY M BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0. 134 ACRE
OF PROPER- Y FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION :LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
MAPLE AVENUE S.W.
TO :
C P• UBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 10/3/84
C EJGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
n U"ILITIES ENG , DIVISION
n F• IRE PREVENTION BUREAU
n PARKS '(),, RECREATION DEPARTMENT
n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n P• OLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS ,
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON OCTOBER 2, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
ole,„÷-4..,..4.,..?0:
7
r-e,74 4.)X17-1— 5 ir dr•e-7Ct
t GW/. i o 4. a J — ---fo/e-sf-e--77
3) , // off c Ctrs a-
p „re...43 G/,s
SG*,dGi E R,(7/7
DATE :
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REP N BUILDING & ZONING DEI ITMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 097 - 84
APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT : LARRY M BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0. 134 ACRE
OF PROPERLY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION :LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
MAPLE AVENUE S.W.
TO :
pi WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 10/3/84
C ENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
l l U'"ILITIES ENG , DIVISION
n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
PARKS it RECREATeION DEPARTMENT
n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS ;
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON OCTOBER 2, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7 .9-FF7 G C A)6!- N' Is-z__,
n APPROVED LE APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
D e-v e I n p wte vt-i i Ll a, e,, 4,--1 71 1-y 1 e---t,
A s s e 5S i,n to; 1.1 be. --.S 4 t Lc L,s : ?3 ,540 o,,/,3ciL. .4c y p =3 o?7 S 4
5937A a9329 = 41'
2 sZ6, "
Z , 1-- q
I'
Pt) c c ,d 0: 1-01..-e d e del- yr eo. 4 rdp ./k
1. 3 „
I
z
Lvt I/ 0r4
e a,-fir -"-ci /`i J- 20 7;'P . JU..... ya S b vX
per- c,'717, 574"a- - 57 V G. 4,4 )
3 , 0 s 3 v-c l ¢ qt.('t y P cl it).e.r- c„ 147' s> Afar-s[
sew c%4t M ri5 \ s e f- Li +t
a ies'g 7 r
r2. 1 DATE : / 2/
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZEPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REP N BUILDING & ZONING DEI TMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 097 - 84
APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT : LARRY M BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0. 134 ACRE
OF PROPERlY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION :LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
MAPLE AVENUE S.W.
TO :
n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 10/3/84
ENGINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
n U--ILITIES ENG , DIVISION
n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
n PARKS RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT_
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON OCTOBER 2, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ' 47/-/Ty o -tk1G/AJg.E'Ae/,CI6,
n APPROVED
L__JAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
I UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TB
9!2G/
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • WA1ft NO
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEER A()
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER YEs #0•p41/4¢•Gr
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SEWER y - 4 N/s'.Fr.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT EIa CHARGE • WATER /vp
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • SEER Ai
APPROVED WATER PLAN 7 Dcpcwtell --(aLi0160 Fib= A e:craky
APPROVED SEER PLAN ES ScEA154 .X. ,a-kiav ,t>,4Qv/,P 1,
APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS
BY FIRE DEPT. E.... .....—.-_.-.
FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS et ! .
Ai
DATE :
7----40 9/27 /(-
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
jai:, '!REVISION 5/
on
REIN BUILDING & ZONING DEFOTMENT
l
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 097 - 84
APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT : LARRY M BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0. 134 ACRE
OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION :LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
MAPLE AVENUE S.W.
TO :
n P• UBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 10/3/84
n E 'GINEERING DIVISION
n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
ri UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
n F• IRE PREVENTION BUREAU
n PARKS 1 RECREATION DEPARTMENT
0 B• UILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
n OTHERS
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5 : 00 P ,M ON OCTOBER 2, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ;r))c 1 )(--
51 APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED
1
z-l=fez -C DATE : /62--
SIGNATURE DIRECTOR AUTH7.,__,t_ _____ _
ZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
RENON BUILDING & ZONING DEfOTMAENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 097 - 84 CITY OF RENTON
APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-094-84) CEP 2, 6 1984
POL`C'!
ncpT
PROPONENT ; LARRY M BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS DEVP.LOPMMT
PROJECT TIT_E ; THOMAS REZONE
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0. 134 ACRE
OF PROPERlY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION ;LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
MAPLE AVENUE S.W.
TO :
n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 10/3/84
I (
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
n U"ILITIES ENG , DIVISION
I (
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
I 1
PARKS RECREATION DEPARTMENT
n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
n POLICE DEPARTMENT
EI POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5; 00 P .M , ON OCTOBER 2, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIO
El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
I NOT APPROVED
A124 ,;1141-tig-Jziev.i..).S4ae.)44dr,c,,e
7ffteA-1 id°4-'
7'1/te''"-Pef-vt77-±J2
DATE : /// 7
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR/( R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
lc')
REPS N BUILDING & ZONING DEI TMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 097 - 84
APPLICATION NO(S) ; REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT : LARRY M BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0. 134 ACRE
OF PROPER- Y FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION ;LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
MAPLE AVE JUE S.W.
TO :
n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 10/3/84
l IEIGINEERING DIVISION
l ( TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :
l ( UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION
El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
l (
PARKS ? RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BUILDI 1G & ZONING DEPARTMENT
l ( POLICE DEPARTMENT
I ( POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
l ( OTHERS :
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED
IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
BY 5: 00 P ,M ON OCTOBER 2, 1984
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; T rlE
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
I ( NOT APPROVED
G , L bf/T GcJ/ z , E //J/// b Tt)
AJ 4o
DATE ;
SIGNATURE OF D TOR R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
1123Z
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING
EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN 1 HE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE
SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON OCTOBER 30, 1984, Al
9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION:
ELSA THOMAS
Application to rezone approximately 0.134 acre of property from R-1 to
L-1 for future office or office/warehouse use, file R-094-84; located on
the north side of S.W. 13th Street and 65 feet east of Maple Avenue S.W.
Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning
Departme
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE
PUBLIC HEARING ON OCTOBER 30, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
PUBLISHED : OCTOBER 19, 1984 Ronald G. Nelson
Building and Zoning Director
CERTIFICATION
I, JEANE- TE M. McKAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE
DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE
PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington
residing in Q,n ,t on the 19th
day of Oc.ober, 1 84.
SIGNED:
OF R1
6p z arTicE0
9,
0
0
O6
ED SEpiE.g
City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner
will hold a
PUBLIC HEARING
in
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS . CITY HALL
ON OCIOBER 30, 1984 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M.
CONCERNING: FILE R-094-84
X ' REZONE From R-1 To L-1
SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMI
To
SITE APPROVAL
SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lot :
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
VARIANCE FROM
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS:
LOCATED ON THE. NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13TH STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF MAPLE AVENUE S.W.
LEGAL DI=SCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT.
ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION
D SIGNIFICANT ISNON=SIGNIFICANT
FOF FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT
PROPER AUTHORIZATION
0532N
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Er vironmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of
non-significance with conditions for the following project:
E LISA THOMAS (ECF-097-84)
Application to rezone approximately 0.134 acre of property from R-1 to L-1
f)r future office or office/warehouse use, file R-094-84; located on the north
s.de of S.W. 13th Street and 65 feet east of Maple Avenue S.W.
The Er vironmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of
non-significance for the following project:
HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES (ECF-098-84)
Application to annex approximately 59 acres of property into the City of
Fenton for a future multi-family housing complex; located southeast of N.E.
27th Street and east of Kirkland Avenue N.E. in an area known locally as
Devil's Elbow."
Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning
Departrient, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC
action riust be filed with the Hearing Examiner by October 22, 1984.
Published: October 8, 1984
NOTICE
ENVIRONMENTAL
DECLARATION
APPLICATION NO. R-094.84, ECF-097-84
P RO P C)SE D ACTION APPLICATION TO RFZONF APPROXIMATE! Y 0.134 ACRE OF
PROPFRTY ROM R-1 TO I -1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE (TR OFF I C,F/WARFHOI lSF MP,
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S,W, 131-4 STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF MAPLE AVENUE S.W.
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED
PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE [ E.R.C. 3 HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
EJDDES DOES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
WILL L WILL NOT
BE RI QUIRED.
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:130 P.M., OCTOBFR 22, 1984
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
235-2550
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
Q535N
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No(s): R-094-84
Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-097-84
Descripticn of Proposal:Application to rezone
approximately 0.134 acre of
property from R-1 to L-1 for
future office or office/warehouse
use.
Proponent: Elisa Thomas
Location of Proposal: Located on the north side of S.W.
13th Street and 65 feet east of
Maple Avenue S.W.
Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and
Zoning Department
This prop'isal was reviewed by the ERC on October 3, 1984, following a presentation by
Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from:
Gene Williams, Gary Norris, Ronald Nelson, James Gray, James Bdurasa, Michael Parness,
Jerry Lind, Richard Houghton, and Robert Bergstrom.
Incorpora:ed by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application
ECF-097-84 are the following:
1. En ironmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Larry M. Brown, dated August 13,
19114.
2.Applications: Rezone (R-094-84).
3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning
Department, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities
Engineering Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Policy Development Department,
Parks and Recreation Department, and the Police Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not
have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW
43.21 C.0:i0(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Reasons 1 or declaration of environmental non-significance:
The subj€ct rezone will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties and
the following requirement shall be complied with:
1.Ti-e subject property is located within the benefit district for traffic
improvements. An assessment of $2,526.86 shall be due to the City at the time of
building permit issuance.
SIGNATL`RES:
Ronald C. Nelson Michael P ess
Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor
Richard . Houghton
Public Works Director
PUBLISHED: OCTOBER 8, 1984
APPEAL DATE: OCTOBER 22, 1984
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 097 - 84
APPLICATION No(s) : REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT: LARF Y M. BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS
PROJECT TITLE: THOMAS REZONE
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.134 ACRE
OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF MAPLE AVE
S.H
SITE AREA: 0.134 ACRE BUILDING AREA (Gross ) : N/A
DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : N/A
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1) Topographic Changes : x
2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: x
3) Water & Water Courses : x
4) Plant Life: x
5) Animal Life:
6) Noise: x
7) Light & Glare : x _
8) Land Use; North: -
East :
South: -
West :
Land Use Conflicts : COMPLIES WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
View Obstruction: DEPENDS ON SPECIFIC SITE PLANS
9) Natural Resources:
10) Risk of Upset :
11) Population/Employment :
12) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 16 TRIP ENDS ESTIMATED
Traffic Impacts : MINOR
14) Public Services : x
15) Energy: x
16) Utilities : x
17) Human Health: x
18) Aesthetics : x
19) Recreation: x
20) Archeology/History: X
Signatures :
Ronald G. Nelson Michael P S
Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant
to the Mayor
f PUBLISHED: OCTOBER 8, 1984
Richard C. Houghton/ APPEAL DATA:: OCTOBER 77, 19R4
Public Works Director
Eti1GINE.ERINC1
SEPTEMBER 20, 1984 OCTOBER 2, 1984
Date circulated : Comments due :
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 097 _ 84
APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT : LARRY M. BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS.
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.134
ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF $.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
SITE AREA :
M&PT34ANCREE S.W.
BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
N/A
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise : t/
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; , north:
east :
south:
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment : t/
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities : L/
17 ) Human health : c/
18 ) Aesthetics : 4-7
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
123
Recommendation : DNSI7X DOS More Information
Reviewed b Title :
Date : 9 Ze)74Y
FORM: ERC-06
ICE-
Date circulated : SEPTEMBER 20, 1984 Comments due :
OCTOBER 2, 1984
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 097 - 84
APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT : LARRY M. BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS.
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.134
ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR CTFIC ,:, ,REHO'USE USE.
LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF $.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
SITE AREA :
M&P}8F4AX r S.W.
BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (9 ) :
N/A
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ;, north:
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More I ormation
Reviewed by : //----Title :
Date
FORM: ERC-06
PART s
4
Date circulated : SEPTEMBER 20, 1984 Comments due :
OCTOBER 2, 1984
ENVIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 097 _ 84
APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT : LARRY M. BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS.
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.134
ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
SITE AREA :
M P.F4A I V JE S.W.
BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
N/A
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ;,north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI ' DOS More Information
Reviewed by : 1I` -'t 9"41 j Title : ,2______ ,,, ei,
Date JO
FORM: ERC-06
1 RR
Date circulated : SEPTEMBER 20, 1984 Comments due :
OCTOBER 2, 1984
ENVIRONMEINITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 097 _ 84
APPLICATION No (s) . REZONE (R-094-84) SFp tElf 1984
PROPONENT : LARRY M. BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS.
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0. 134
ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
L OCA TIA : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF $.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
SITE AREA :
M P F34A I I 1E S.W.
BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (5 ) : N/A
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ;, north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendati : NSI_ DOS Mo e Information!
Reviewed Title •iGi i-e
Date : 6
FORM: ERC-06
YTILITIE€j
Date circulated : SEPTEMBER 20, 1984 Comments due :
OCTOBER 2, 1984
ENVIRONMENITAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 097 _ 84
APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT : LARRY M. BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS.
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.134
ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
SITE AREA :
MgPT34AACREE S.W.
BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (°o) ;
N/A
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7) Light & glare :
8) Land Use ;.north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : f
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :1f. clevi:c‘s 1 v
4,, p 144
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information
Reviewed by : f Title : t/T/,i /TY vg//Gi/,ti` -g,
Date : 27 / %-
FORM: ERC-06
PoL4c'f
DE.V.
r
t
Date circulated : SEPTEMBER 20, 1984 Comments due :
OCTOBER 2, 1984
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 097 - 84 CITY OF RENTON
APPLICATION No (s) . REZONE (R-094-84) SEP 2019R4
PROPONENT : LARRY M. BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS. FOLIC/
Nilo1'Mr"T nroT
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.134
ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF $.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
SITE AREA :
M&PiF34A 1 V JE S.W.
BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (°o) ;
N/A
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : i/
J
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7) Light & glare :
8) Land Use ;, north:
east :
south:
west :
Land use conflicts : vJ
View obstruction : DO 841,h ip," Sf;,ecCJii ,S'/eio/ems
9) Natural resources : v'T::'
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : ,Dela ,.f/S c' -/r6fPyyt,o!
r
ere.s dy5-2e cyric,4&
traffic impacts :il 1 ` 4, ( 'e '
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information
Reviewed by : C 1/e i2soki Title : 45/:540q/ )61/
tsrtiei"
Date : /O/6,
2 8Y
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulated : SEPTEMBER 20, 1984 Comments due :
OCTOBER 2 1984
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEV SHEET
E C F - 097 _ 84
APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT : LARRY M. BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS.
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.134
ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF $.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
MUPSITEAREA : T34AACREE S.W.
BUILDING AREA (gross ) N/A
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
N/A
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : x
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4) Plant life : 1
5 ) Animal life : A
6) Noise : y
7) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ;,north:
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment : 1(
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history : k
COMMENTS :
Yyi e Q oZ. V
Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information_
Reviewed by :i'' 'Title :
Date :
FORM: ERC-06
TRAFFIC.
SEPTEMBER 20, 1984 OCTOBER 2, 1984
Date circulated : Comments due :
ENIVIRONMEINITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
E C F - 097 - 84
APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT : LARRY M. BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS.
PROJECT TITLE : THOMAS REZONE
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.134
ACRE OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF
SITE AREA :
M P F4A I 1 1E S.W.
BUILDING AREA (gross) N/A
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
N/A
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : _
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
t/
8 ) Land Use ; , north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9 ) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
p 1
13 ) Trip ends ( I TE ) . ":5-7;ke. l o P ,, l6 ttid eeherakd
traffic impacts : hlyI y,
14 ) Public services :
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities : r/
17 ) Human health : L=
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation : L'
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS : /
o VeveloP GuQ l-, a_ 10.,_, p -
A 55 e55¢krt {J, l l e 2 S ,//aw S ;
y3 560 < ./ rc 837.of SQ XD, y32.7 -- Zd SZG,
Z e /_)_" QPer„dc..73 v: ed :r ,r,,,,cbrh, A»arm 41-VG
Te.rw tnateda{• each in J-20 7yie </v„Gf'oi, b o fl• .
Recommendation : DNSI_ c/ DOS More Information ___ ,.., >ts 001114
Reviewed by : Title :
a+ u'M+M
Date : Setlf. ` 198y
s, Dhe threelL 4/fPt)` c.,a ved c
FORM: SRC-06 25 ' MFt. toa 5,,,ci0i-•-, apr.)r— acf,
v 9y - S
IPTrER—OFFICE MEMO
TO: DON MONAGHAN DATE QCTOBER 25, 1984
FROM• JEANETTE
RE: LEGAL FOR UPCOMING PUBLIC HEARING --
OCTOBER 30, 1984
ENCLOSED IS THE LEGAL FOR THE ELISA THOMAS REZONE. PLEASE CHECK IT FOR ANY
ERRORS OR MISSING INFORMATION. ",r 4.e- •`
I HAVE ALSO INCLUDED ALTERRA's LEGAL ALTHOUGH WE EXPECT THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING
WILL BE CONTINUED.
THANKS,
410
OF RA,,
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTti
RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR
Z odL
p9 co.
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540
o
P09gT6-0 SI.P1'.
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAti OR
October 19, 1984
Elisa Th)mas
1815 Mantis Avenue
San Ped;•o, CA 90732
Re: F ezone application to allow future office or office/warehouse use, file R-094-84;
p-operty located on the north side of S.W. 13th Street and 65 feet east of Maple
A venue S.W.
Dear Ms. Thomas:
The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above
mention9d application on September 18, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton
Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for October 30, 1984. The public hearing
commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall.
The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public
hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have
any ques tions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550.
Sincerely,
cA e
Roger J. Blaylock
Zoning administrator
RJB:JMIA:cl
1131Z
S
OF R4L'
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
c) 4$ -,-.1,— 9 ,
or,RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR
p wN rn
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540
9,
0 co-
0,
9gTFO SEF Sc_0`3
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYC R
October : 9, 1984
Larry Brawn
13975 Interurban Avenue S.
Seattle, IVA 98168
Re: RE zone application to allow future office or office/warehouse use, file R-094-84;
pr)perty located on the north side of S.W. 13th Street and 65 feet east of Maple
A\ enue S.W.
Dear Mr. Brown:
The Cit;, of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on September 18, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton
Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for October 30, 1984. The public hearing
commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall.
The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public
hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have
any quest ions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550.
Sincerely,
t fit .
Roger J. Blaylock
Zoning Administrator
RJB:JMN1:cl
1131Z-2
1 130Z
BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
OCTOBER 30,1984
APPLICANT: ELISA THOMAS
FILE NUMBER: R-094-84
A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The applicant seek approval to rezone 5,280 square feet (0.134 acre) of property
fr)m R-1, Residential - Single Family to L-1, Light Industrial for future office or
office/warehouse use.
B. GI:NERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner of Record: Christina M. Mignacco
2.Applicant: Elisa Thomas
3. Location:
Vicinity Map Attached) North side of S.W. 13th Street and
65 feet east of Maple Avenue S.W.
4.Legal Description: A detailed legal description is
available on file in the Renton
Building & Zoning Department.
5. Size of Property: 5,820 square feet (0.134 acre)
6. Access: S.W. 13th Street
7. Existing Zoning: R-1, Residential - Single Family
8.Existing Zoning in the Area: C-1, General Use; R-1, Residential
Single Family; B-1, Business Use;
and L-1, Light Industrial.
9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan:Manufacturing Park
10. Notification: The applicant was notified in
writing of the hearing date. Notice
was properly published in the Daily
Record Chronicle on October 19,
1984, and posted in three places on
or near the site as required by city
ordinance on October 19, 1984.
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
T ie subject site was annexed into the City of Renton by Ordinance #1745 of April
ill, 1959, which was later corrected by Ordinance #1756 of May 19, 1959 and
Ordinance #1928 of December 12, 1961. The property, upon annexation, was zoned
G-6000. This zoning designation was later changed to R-1, Residential - Single
F amily, with the adoption of the new zoning map which combined several single
family designations into one classification. The zoning map was adopted by
Ordinance #3634 of June 13, 1982.
D. P-IYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1.Topography: The subject site is relatively flat.
PRELIMINARY REPOR1 TO E. HEARING EXAMINER
ELISA THOMAS: R-094-84
OCTOBER 30, 1984
PAGE 2
2. Soils: Urban Land (Ur). This soil has been modified by disturbance of the
natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to
accommodate large industrial and housing installations. The erosion hazard is
slight to moderate. No capability or woodland classification.
3. Vegetation: The subject site is covered with a thick growth of blackberry
brambles.
4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides some suitable habitat for birds and
small animals.
5.Water: No water was observed on the subject site.
6.Land Use: The subject site is currently undeveloped.
E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
The subject site is surrounded by single family residences to the east, south and
west and a mixture of offices and single family residences to the north.
F. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Utilities:
a. Water: A 12-inch water line is located along Maple Avenue S.W. and a
6-inch water line is locatred along S.W. 13th Street.
b. Sewer: An 8-inch sanitary sewer line is located approximately 150 feet
west of the subject site.
c. Storm Water Drainage: The applicant is required to provide a storm
water retention/detention system.
2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance
requirements.
3.Transit: METRO Transit Routes #912 operates along S.W. Grady Way near
the subject site.
4. Schools:
a. Elementary Schools: Not applicable.
b. Middle Schools: Not applicable.
c. High Schools: Not applicable.
5.Recreation: Not applicable.
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1.Section 4-706, Residential - Single Family (R-1).
2. Section 4-712, Light Industry (L-1).
3.Section 4-744(F)(2), Landscape Requirements - Green River Valley.
H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER
OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT:
1.Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan
Compendium, 1983, p. 31-35.
2.Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Ordinance No. 3050
of October 8, 1984 (effective October 17, 1984).
3. Industrial Goal and Policies, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive
Plan Compendium, 1983, p. 18-19.
4. Section 3014(C), Change of Zone Classification (Rezone).
IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT:
1.Natural Systems: Development of the subject site will remove the
vegetation. Good construction and building practices can mitigate any
negative impacts as a result of construction activities.
PRELIMINARY REPOF 0 THE HEARING EXAMINER
ELISA THOMAS: R-094-04
OCTOBER 30, 1984
PAGE 3
2. Population/Employment: Minor.
3. Schools: Not applicable.
4. Social: Not applicable.
5.Traffic: There is insufficient information to determine the traffic impact on
nearby roads.
J.ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State
Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a final declaration of
non-significance was issued on October 3, 1984, by the Environmental Review
Committee.
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1. City of Renton Building & Zoning Department.
2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division.
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division.
4. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division.
5.City of Renton Police Department.
6. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau.
7.City of Renton Policy Development Department.
8. City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department.
L. DLPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1.The applicant, Elisa Thomas, is requesting approval to rezone approximately
5,820 square feet (.134 acre) of property from R-1, Residential - Single
Family to L-1, Light Industry. The applicant has not provided information on
a specific proposal for developing the site but has indicated the site will be
used for future office or office/warehouse use.
2.The Environmental Review Committee issued a final declaration of
non-significance provided the following condition is complied with:
a. The subject property is located within the benefit district for traffic
improvements. An assessment of $2,526.86 shall be due to the City at
the time of building permit issuance.
3.The Land Use Hearing Examiner must review four specific criteria under
Section 4-3014(C) to determine that the circumstances surrounding the
rezone request are adequate to recommend approval of the reclassification.
The following evidence clearly demonstrates the rezone request is
appropriate.
a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject
reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the
time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning.
The subject property was annexed into the City of Renton in 1961 by
Ordinance No. 1928. Both the city-wide Comprehensive Plan adopted
in 1965 and the Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan adopted in 1975
clearly show the area's designation for Manufacturing Park activities.
The R-1, Residential - Single Family Zoning designation was applied to
the property in 1982 as a result of combining several single family
residential zones together. The property at the time was zoned
G-6000, a single family zone. There has not been a rezone considered
on the site since the property was annexed into the City.
b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being
requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan
and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is
appropriate.
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO E HEARING EXAMINER
ELISA THOMAS: R-094-84
OCTOBER 30, 1984
PAGE 4
The proposed rezone request from R-1, Residential - Single Family to
L-1, Light Industry is in general conformance with the Green River
Valley Comprehensive Plan in effect at the time the application was
made to the City. The rezone request does not specifically comply with
the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park for the
subject site. The rezone appears appropriate due to past City actions
on other properties in the Earlington plat area where the subject site is
located.
The City has approved a number of rezones in the general area to both
B-1, Business Use, and L-1, Light Industrial Use, as a result of the
hardship resulting from the strict application of setback requirements
in the Manufacturing Park Zone being applied to the small lots (3,000
square feet) which are typical for the subject area. The large setback
requirements of the Manufacturing Park Zone (front yard of 60 feet and
side and rear yards of 20 feet) would preclude development on the small
lots. As a result, rezones to B-1, Business Use, and L-1, Light
Industrial Use have been allowed together with the imposition of
restrictive covenants establishing minimum setbacks for buildings and a
requirement for landscaping areas. Generally these requirements have
been landscaped setbacks of twenty (20) feet for front yards and a
range of six (6) feet to ten (10) feet for side yards together with a
requirement for site approval (see Anderson/Minetta, R-013-83;
Beckmann, R-060-83; and Swales, R-062-83).
The proposed rezone request appears to be in conformance with the new
Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan which became effective
October 17, 1984 (see Ordinance 3850). The proposed use of the
property for future office or office/warehouse appears to be in keeping
with the land use policy for the area. The new Comprehensive Plan
designates the area as Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option. According
to the land use policies, this is an area intended primarily for Light
Industrial uses with certain compatible heavy industrial, service
commercial and office uses located in a park-like setting of high
operational and environmental standards (see p. 18, Green River
Comprehensive Plan, 1984, Ordinance 3850).
c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the
subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private
development or other circumstances affecting the subject property
have undergone significant and material change.
Since 1975, the property in the general area has been undergoing a
transition from single family residential development and undeveloped
property to commercial and industrial land uses. Development for
several years was generally concentrated along S.W. Grady Way but
during the past three years, uses have been changing in the area south
of S.W. Grady Way, North of I-405, and west of Rainier Avenue S. The
subject site is located within this "new" area of changing land uses.
d. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to
address the question of timeliness.
The subject property, although it does not appear to be the next logical
parcel for rezone, is within 200 feet of property rezoned to L-1, Light
Industrial to the southwest and within 300 feet of property zoned L-1 to
the north. There is a possibility that the site will not be immediately
developed.
In addition, infill of the area is expected to occur within the next five
years. Major public improvements to S.W. Grady Way, Lind Avenue
S.W. and public utilities in the area support the potential for actual
development. Given the general rate of growth of business and
industrial activities in this area, the proposed rezone appears to be
timely.
PRELIMINARY REPOF 0 THE HEARING EXAMINER
ELISA THOMAS: R-094-84
OCTOBER 30, 1984
PAGE 5
4. Various City departments have reviewed the subject proposal. The Parks
Department, Police Department.. and the Building Department approved the
proposal without conditions. Policy Development Department, Fire
Prevention Bureau, Engineering Division, Utility Engineering Division, and
Traffic Engineering Division approved the subject proposal subject to the
following conditions:
a. Policy Development Department:
1) Recommended approval subject to restrictive covenants requiring
site plan approval for any future development.
b. Fire Prevention Bureau:
1) Future building development will be required to comply with all
building and fire codes.
c. Engineerinq Division:
1) Off-site improvements required at time of development.
2) Storm water retention/detention with supporting calculations
required at the time of development.
3) Alley needs to be paved if used for access when property develops.
4) Sanitary sewer extension required.
d. Utility Engineering Division:
1) Sanitary sewer extension required.
2) May need to improve water system depending upon requirements
for fire protection at time of development.
e. Traffic Engineering Division:
1) Development in a benefit district, assessement will be as follows:
43,560 x .134 = 5,837 square feet
5,837 x $0.4329 = $2,526.86 (assessment amount)
2) 1-1/2 PVC conduit required underneath sidewalk terminated each
end in J-20 "B" type junction box per city standard (street
lighting).
3) One street light required per city standard 25' MH, 100 watt
sodium vapor ect.
5.The Earlington Flats area as mentioned above, is an area in transition. The
area now has a variety of land uses ranging from single famiy residences to
commercial and industrial uses. Although the Comprehensive Plan Map
designates the area as Manufacturing Park, there are still several parcels
zoned for single family residential uses. At times, property locations for
proposed projects or land use actions have been located adjacent to single
family residences. The Hearing Examiner, at times, has required both
landscaping and a site obscuring fence as buffer between two dissimilar
zoning districts (see Anderson/Minietta Rezone (file R-013-83). This
requirement has been applied as a means to comply with buffering policies
for industrial and commercial areas as stated in the Policies Element of the
City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium (see Policy 2, p. 19 and
Policy 8, p. 17).
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above analysis, the Building and Zoning Department recommends
approval of the rezone, file R-094-84, subject to the following conditions:
1.The filing of restrictive covenants requiring:
a. Site approval.
b. Building setback requirements of a twenty (20) foot landscaped setback
from S.W. 13th Street and a ten (10) foot landscaped setback from side
and rear property lines.
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO = HEARING EXAMINER
ELISA THOMAS: R-094-84
OCTOBER 30, 1984
PAGE 6
2.A six (6) foot solid, sight-obscuring fence should be constructed prior to
occupancy of any structure built on the subject site. This requirement will
not be necessary if, at the time of building construction, the adjacent single
family zoned property has been rezoned to either B-1, Commercial Use or
L-1, Light Industry.
0
is _ ' '!:il 1 .. • 1 I II 1 ;
sue:: _---- yi b?_ —
I
1.
1 7
W I _I I:
I 4 M , fl p i
J 7 I I
i o P+
1 1u11 I 1
Z I j.!` ,1 r ,11N11 I Ir1
I— -
1 1c ';;0 `
N` 11111III• ili 1111 Imo""
I i 8-1 I
I HERQ J I 1 Kam•. it
bC
11
1! !011 f11q 11'
I1I 'it1 1 i11jI !1111i %1 a:vTER-
5
f Er,iii:Li racre„.
c.
I_ I
I
r,S
II LA
I
r_1
hs11.1.1.1.
1.
N •• 7 'I
y. '
I MAIR ` 1 - •.• St
r 1 1' :
4c----
1-.L:-_--.
7-_,o-__..:A_li r---,:,— „ ,f—,
I
o
y _ .,11 /
3.
C "4 -E.
r _ _[ .
iE,
0- s 1. 1I . , ::
1 y`-
r1 I/r,
1
THOMAS REZONE
R-94-84
APPLICANT ELISA THOMAS TOTAL AREA - 5,820 SQ. FT.
PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 13TH STREET
EXISTING ZONING R-1, RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE FAMILY
EXIST ING USE UNDEVELOPED
PROPCSED USE REZONE TO L-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO ALLOW FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN M-P MANUFACTURING PARK
WAREHOUSE USE
COMMENTS
20___ iNocoi< 11
it'll 4:t 3
ri , ,i c4 A CICO Igiv:AlitEm.
15/t I
i
i
iN
r\
s.ii 13+-
k st
Q.g
ITY OF RENTON
T
sEP184
1/V BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
L 1
a,
S,. M;°ill}1 ••°•°•°•°•° • °•°• /.0
c i 0000 W11 •000.0:' • • • • • • • • • • •\ • •IIIo°o° 06060O° • • • • • • • • • • • • • '
g°g°o°o•j • • • • • • • • • • • • •
r4, rill lig I ..:..g,,,:MINIM a:,4,gggegg;3' •.•.•.•„*.•„. •.*.
e. *. .
sei U
a I l,°p°odoo AM r i.goggo°og.a.V-V_'`Y •• • • • • • • •• •
A'
i
6iAV Ii1Vi.i•4il"
I.
NlVIiolo 4t140ttgi1110Al11110, "1'/
i11..1l l0t•e•l
000O011(j • • • • • • • •
i! 'tis i anwi_• 0g00g pg• It • • • • c:
o opo 0 opo t
gggg o ,Rn 4, -.0gogo °o: • • • •
ir;• ' ogogoo rt ggOog. • • • _gam • • • •••-:: 0 0 O 0 I. i1 g D °o°o o°o' r •
um • • • • •
JjFIIuIt vA,
3
U\
2
O b 0 0 0
1 i'1n .00gO
ogOgoi
OgOo }•Og0° I1 11.• % //—!JtV II
W,..O O O O O r pe
1.1
c.•„,,
N...,,
Ar.(..„,
t..-
o
ii
coo
o..-
1-ei-.!n.nr--,
i!ol!•t;!-o•!-„•m•!o•
l-
o!-"
o1•
Z.-
ii.
e1;
i;:
2-
o J o°o°o o°o°o°o°ii .° tit•• 9E9B R O•
f. 0000°°° °°°°°°°.. . °'
1 1 ogog ° °°°ogogoOD•.•. al.
V popopo 1 O •
000.0'00000gogO00og„, 0. 111 ni r ..
0 0 0"
4\u1 1 „® iiuii o , ,ii,:
tD•0
i
l'
t/'_ _ ooO OU I K31q•'' j!,Q'dr r
a
d/.° O°°°O°O°O°t13 .1
1,:I 1•_. . r
Q 1 A1 K a•S< ' 1.l'p°p°p0°000°O ••I 11 ' ,r}{
i::::::::::::: ,
A,,',', _ =-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-N„.:::::•:...........-........... arda M n.
i` •'rs uu •,o,o,o,o,oul..].: ,r'/fv t{
gip It//1; 0 y
c 3 I 11.t.11 tl .
rj'' t}.,•: r'•'`' Cis
t :,fro •- ,• o• .t,•. A ,..;;;I:r.:'terC> ,•,tm a!;.' 3 :,` c,
r• t5 f•1 10 1 N••',i.II _Ias!d11ii1 I'.a.
7, a c.
alit 4..1 :;:4 r a.. i-,',::''s.cl. .- .,1
7=-7.-- — - :-:-:-------------- *<:i::.:::::i.:::ii., I' Ill.,:oiptu ippl k - ,, ,..,-..z.;;;zjam•'
j.
1jJ
t-
s-.
Ilk
00000•
g .1„ .•000000000
1 1 •goo1' ------
1 1(•
p°o r rM off.
a
lr _- _- •o0000000o
i` _ Ou_•ai.
000000000• z_1cco0000000001 ,gir••c. o0000000oo•',fc',c _- — I 1 e ..I.
7. 00000000000 ^. -----
41R1601141Ca 1 c.•.•,;ti,: -,..'r R -. 00000000000•C'.
I_ 4
c•••• 00.0.0.0.00 • '' ., _-_-,ri-.._-_-_-,a_issigity4 iive...10,st gliniri:i
n:
iTi*:::::::: ..:,,re " ,.p,.:.(
t1 , .
417,,_ _.. 0..
isse4. . .i....,...:1414.11k::-_-_-_-_-:-:.--
01-Mae -IIi-
411101 ',..:.-:===.1.---=.=-_-=_-±=.::::: -::::::- -=-_-_-===
1.,,'...,,.:
0..
4
f,'
4'"
1 .' I ____-__-_ _ —_-_- •ram: o°o
RRR"'
III
0, ,...
lir.
i ,g,:::::Is k'S:
ccet„,..:
Iiil.:4. ,
o, ;:
z___;______;:
i
r .C.M .'Y>
o i`::.
1,a F
C' 'r•
f Est 71 1171 ifb-tT-illl4` o:<%;'c 000000. _JAl
000000•
it.:gt rt 0000 o000000 =
7i- P 8 4',` °°orOOátL ,00r 0000000°°° °n
e 1t9,r i .'1 000000•rF-' 1 r rc>p'' i. 0000°:
LAND USE ELEMENT
Single Family Commercial
1_ ' .' —_- Low Densityf.,%- __-___=_ Multl-F mily Office / Office Park
i,.^ ____= Medium Density ogog°.
A
Multi-Family 0000000
00000.00000.0. Public/Quasi-Public
0000000•
WNWWARAOHigh Density
MAN Multi-Family Light Industrial
r
r'f Recreation Heavy Industrial
ESA `. Greenbelt Manufacturing Parkcu,i S ,
J
KtV1bW1NG V AKIMhNl /ll1V1S1UN : L_dJs—r
APPROVED AF )VED WITH CONDITIONS INOT APPROVED
C L ''Cr DATE :
SIGNQTUREO( DIRECTOR AUTH RIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIO :
Ei APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
42.ieerh141.,
u4ae-.?4--A) - Cez.-4,-7-tog-
e44.24)0,.../A.0.44.1.,,, DATE : /ô//7
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR nR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : "Z E
n APPROVED 1-7 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED
DG , .V C/L bf:'/2-7/i)T Gc)/4 L /3 E /7Et:W/lZc1) TO
A G L Qc .4)G 9,J,o C,c7IDES
DATE : y — Zo _ FL/
SIGNATURE OF D TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
a i nnn
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :
a APPROVED L., APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ej NOT APPROVED
K,'I, , -- f % /7'
c. ,- i u-s s 01- C C ma's
p rr-e-e-6 di-ve-/or
RAyd
Aver
g) 7DATE:
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Te.9--FFI G C A V ?
El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
Be -te -ri.--1 1-y-t
1 SSesSbvleth- 4i.7 540 4,/3y•L AcyP =S)g37
6, 937Ac, 32-9 = 5Z6. s6
As e s Ste.-," • .a
P V C Cv d : f- - - ' uti, der 112 J.1
r3 „
c L L cI, if G,fr Spa.a a,-ter
rL S' M S' .,v ‘-.7
IJ
See C'//47' N!o ir.5.11'1 sIsrcc•f• L/»
DATE: 7/WA/SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE
OBV REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ()miry , LG//.jEE //lam
APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED
ITT APPROVAL SYOIECT TO I '146/
E COMERS AGREEMENT • NATE1 NO
E COMERS RHEUM • SEMER A()
STEM DEVELOPMENT COARSE • \ATEI YES . #0.04/50•A-r•
TEM DEVELOPMENT CIa"4CE - SEVER V,Ej S0.0i
ECIAL ASSESSMENT D.A CURE • TRIER NO
ECM ASSESSMENT ASEA CMtRGE • SEWER A[p
PROVED wA1ER RAN ccpcm r _ 0,561`(v2w F/tc, e ria r
PROVED SEVER PLAN y .s SaElJE,e 42(7A-Atsiev ,e, 4,ezeE6
PROVED FIRE MTaIIAMT LOCATIONS
IT FIRE DEPT.
RE FLOM ANALYSIS 6et A
DATE: 9/27 j¢
SIGNATURE OF DpRECTOR OR AU FD P_, iESENTATIVE I-(
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISlnni : 4S
APPROVED n AF , ,.OVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
retri-AY-1-- e 7/J DATE : ! Zd !
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR THORIZED REPRES, NTATIVE
REVISION 6/1982
Form 182
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; fafe-Ge-
APPROVED 11APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED
Q e..-- _ DATE : 9ei‘-.-29Y
SIGNA OF DIR OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REVISION 5/1982
Form 182
0535N
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No(s): R-094-84
Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-097-84
Descriptio i of Proposal:Application to rezone
approximately 0.134 acre of
property from R-1 to L-1 for
future office or office/warehouse
use.
Proponent; Elisa Thomas
Location of Proposal: Located on the north side of S.W.
13th Street and 65 feet east of
Maple Avenue S.W.
Lead Agergy: City of Renton Building and
Zoning Department
This prop(sal was reviewed by the ERC on October 3, 1984, following a presentation by
Jerry Linc of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from:
Gene Williams, Gary Norris, Ronald Nelson, James Gray, James Bdurasa, Michael Parness,
Jerry Lind, Richard Houghton, and Robert Bergstrom.
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application
ECF-097-34 are the following:
1.Ern ironmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Larry M. Browh, dated August 13,
19E 4.
2.Applications: Rezone (R-094-84).
3. Rey:ommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning
Department, Design Engineering Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Utilities
Engineering Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Policy Development Department,
Pal ks and Recreation Department, and the Police Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not
have a sic;nificant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW
43.21C.033(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete
environm€ ntal checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Reasons f)r declaration of environmental non-significance:
The subject rezone will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties and
the follom ing requirement shall be complied with:
1.Th 3 subject property is located within the benefit district for traffic
im)rovements. An assessment of $2,526.86 shall be due to the City at the time of
bu:lding permit issuance.
SIGNATURES:
F7onald G. Nelson Michael P ess
Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor
Richard C. Houghton
Public Works Director
PUBLISI-ED: OCTOBER 8, 1984
APPEAL DATE: OCTOBER 22, 1984
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 097 - 84
APPLICATION No(s) : REZONE (R-094-84)
PROPONENT: LARY M. BROWN, AGENT FOR ELISA THOMAS
PROJECT TITLE: THOMAS REZONE
Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.134 ACRE
OF PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO L-1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE.
LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13th STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF MAPLE AVE
S.H
SITE AREA: 0.134 ACRE BUILDING AREA (Gross) : N/A
DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : N/A
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1) Topographic Changes : x
2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: x
3) Water & Water Courses : x
4) Plant Life: x
5) Animal Life: X
6) Noise: x
7) Light & Glare: x
8) Land Use; North: -
East :
South: -
West :
Land Use Conflicts : COMPLIES WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
View Obstruction: DEPENDS ON SPECIFIC SITE PLANS
9) Natural Resources :
10) Risk of Upset :
11) Population/Employment:
12) Number of Dwellings :
13) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 16 TRIP ENDS ESTIMATED
Traffic Impacts : MINOR
14 ) Public Services : x
15) Energy: X
16) Utilities : X
17) Human Health: X
18) Aesthetics : X
19 ) Recreation: x
20) Archeology/History:X
Signatures :
47-eg,(-/-
Ronald G. Nelson Michael P s
Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant
to the Mayor
4,4i.t/P.Get+ N PUBLISHED: OCTOBER 8, 1984
Richard C. Houghton/
2 APPEAL DATE:: orTnRER 27, 1c3H4
Public Works Di -tor
4.
NOTICE
ENVIRONMENTAL
DECLARATION
APPLICATION NO. R-094-84, ECF-097-84
PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION TO RFZONF APPROXIMATELY 0.134 ACRE OF
PROPERTY ROM R-1 Td 1 -1 FOR FUTURE OFFICE OR OFFLCF/WARFHOUSF USF.
GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 13TH STREET AND 65 FEET EAST OF MAPLE AVENUE S.W.
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED
PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE I E.R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
DOES DOES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
DWILL WILL NOT
BE REQUIRED.
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:I30 P.M., OCTOBFR 77, 1Q84
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
235-2550
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
FRENTO
T
FILE NO(S): A — 7 -4
CO> Es BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMcsm i
e
N o MASTER APPLICATiON
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those
items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed.
Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION
NAME FEES
Elisa Thomas REZONE*(FROM R-1 TO _L—I ) 30
ADDRESS
SPECIAL PERMIT*
1815 Mantis Avenue
CITY ZIP
ED TEMPORARY PERMIT*
San Pedro, California 90732 u CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT*
11 SITE PLAN APPROVAL
TELEPHONE
GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT
213) 832-66 51 No. of Cubic Yards:
CONTACT PERSON
fl VARIANCE
From Section:
Justification Required
NAME
Larry Brown
ADDRESS
SUBDIVISIONS:
13975 Interurban Avenue South Q SHORT PLAT
CITY ZIP TENTATIVE PLAT
Seattle, Was]ington 98168 El PRELIMINARY PLAT
TELEPHONE FINAL PLAT
206 241--1616 ED WAIVER
Justif' ation Required)
OWNER NO. OF LOT .
NAME PLA 'AME:
Christina M. Mignacco
ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT:
1815 Manti3 Avenue 1 PRELIMINARY
CITY ZIP n FINAL
San Pedro, California 90732
P.U.D. NAME:
TELEPHONE
213) 832-6661 Residential 0 Industrial
aCommercial ® Mixed
LOCATION
MOBILE HOME PARKS:
PROI RTY ADORES.;
i{k t) Q TENTATIVE
200 S.W. 13th
EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING f®f
PRELIMINARY
Vacant R-1 lJ FINAL
i
PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: -----
future office or office/warehouse
f
NUMB SF SPACES:
1.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 575 Oi
SQ. FT. ACRES
AREA: TOTAL FEES JD5
5,820 0.134 Wej pi -
CITY OF "NM cTAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING
DATE
STM (JI D APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: i L L5
Q 4
APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:
0 Accepted
J VA
CC Q 1 p p8
JG1 Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By:
Initials)
DATE ROUTE6UILDING/ZONING DEPT,
ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY:
APPLLICAATION DETERMINED TO BE:
l`.
p'{ 2,0 ( t-{ - r Accepted 9 r 2`-84
1 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By:
Initials)
ROUTED TO:
0 Building Q Design Eng. 0 Fire zt Parks
El Police Policy Dev. Traffic Eng.Utilities
REVISION 5/19N32
Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet).
Block 17 Lots 31 & 32 C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens No. 1 according to
plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74, records of King County,
Washington.
AFFIDAVIT
4 S r being duly sworn, declare that I am
ri authorized representative to act for the property owner, =owner of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the
information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
DAY OF 4 v4 j rJ -
19 04-
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF
444./14‘02,4.#
Mat Nc4—eA-1 4, VerY4-42---s--7
Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner)
0
9 fl 6)9-7,3/ i' / s _ s
Address)Address)
OFFICIALMPARSIAL
1
NOTARY PUBLIC-CAi1FOgl Itg,,l ,«`LOS ANCELES COUNTY
My Comm.Expires March 1 1,1987
City) State) (Zip)
Telephone)
Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete
application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in
the "Application Procedure."
Form #174
M t- 5 N A 0 CO I. '
av- V PE
fit
IC(Ci< irl
sir
31 03?
Sf0/>
I
SL) I3 kS
I a\
CITY OF RENTON
C Mi -NE E
gip 181984
BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
CITY OF RENTON
ono
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SEp 181984 -R —Application No.Q 711 —
Envi ronmental Checklist No. e:Ci' - o 9 ,- ( / BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date:
0 Declaration of Significance El Declaration of Significance
0 Declaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS:
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent Larry M. Brown agent for Elisa Thomas
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
C/O Western Pacific Properties, Inc.
13975 Interurban Avenue South,
Seattle, Washington, 98168.
241-1616
3. Date Checklist submitted August 13, 1984
4. Agency requiring Checklist Zoning / Planning and Policy Development
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
Rezone Rl to Ll
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
Rezone of subject property to Light Industrial for
future development.
2-
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal ) :
property is situated on S.W. 13th Street 60 feet Fast of Maple Avenue
S.W. , near 1-405 to the South. The area is in transition from single
family to L-1 and commercial uses.
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
January, 1985
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local--including rezones) :
City of Renton rezone.
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain:
Yes. Sometime in 1985, the property may be developed with an office
or office/warehouse facility.
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal ? If yes , explain:
No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
N/A
II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features? X
ES MAYBE NO
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features? X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
YES YMBENO
Explanation :
Depending on the proposed future development.
3-
2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
YES MAYBE NO
b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either locally or
regionally? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements , in either marine or fresh waters?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X__
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? x
YES MAYBE NO
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body? X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
YES MAYBE NO
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria ,
or other substances into the ground waters? x
YES MAYBE NC,
i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: DPpend i ncg nn i-hg prnpnsd future rev 1 opment_
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass, crops ,
microflora and aquatic plants)? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora? x
TES-- NO
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area , or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
species? j14_
YES MAYBE NO
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: Depe di ng on the_psoposad future deve]opment.
4-
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)?x
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?x
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area ,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna? Y.—
YES MAYBE NO
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:Depending on the proposed future development.
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?
YES MAYBE Fib-
Explanation:Depending on the proposed future development.
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation : Change fLoin vacant to future commercial use.
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in :
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? x
YES MAYBE NO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area? x
YES gTTETE NO
Explanation: Depending on the proposed future developaient.
5-
12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: Possible removal of up to three (3) single family homes.
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in :
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X—
YES MAYBE NO
b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand
for new parking? x
YES MAYBE NO
c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
YES MAYBE NU
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
Xbicyclistsorpedestrians?
YES RATTI NO
Explanation: Depending on the proposed future development.
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
a) Fire protection?
YES MAYBE NO
b) Police protection? X
YES MAYBE NO
c) Schools?X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Parks or other recreational facilities?X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:Depending on the proposed future development.
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy? X
YES MBE NO
Explanation:
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Communications systems? X__
YES MAYBE NO
c) Water? X _
YES MAYBE NO
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks? x
YES MAYBE NO
e) Storm water drainage?
YES MAYBE N-0--
f) Solid waste and disposal? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: Depending nn the proposed future development.
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent:
signed
L,AeR Vow j
name printed)
City of Renton
Building & Zoning Department
May, 1983
Form M 176
WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC.
if't
RNCommercialBrokerageCompanyO (o R U r
SEP 211984
September 19 , 1984
BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
Mr. Jerry Lind
Zoning Department
City of Renton
Municipal Building
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
RE: Mignacco Rezone
Dear Mr . Lind:
Further to your request, please find attached Ticor Title
Insurance Company' s Commitment for Title Insurance No.
A-326766 showing Christine Alexander Mignacco as the vested
owner of that certain property described as:
Lots 31 and 32 in Block 17 of C.D. Hillman' s Earlington
Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle , Division No. 1
according to the plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats,
Page 74, in King County,
Should you need further information, please do not hesitate
to call .
Best regards,
WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC.
AA,AA,.pA •SC- .1-1-ity-ci.„,....
Larry M. Brown
LMB/cb2. 12
Enclosures
13975 Interurban Avenue South • Seattle,Washington 98168 • (206) 241-1616
WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC.
Commercial Brokerage Company
August 13th, 1984
CITY OF RENTON THITCITY
OF
RENTONRezonePlanningDepartment
City Hall
Renton, WA 980.55 isEp 1 8 1 --J
Re: REZONE JUSTIFICATION
Mignacco. BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
Dear Sirs:
Outlined below are a number of reasons in support of the rezone
request:
1 . The comprehensive plan indicates L-I or possible M-P for
the subject property.
2. Recent rezones have been granted in the same general area .
a. Ordinance 3053 August 1976
b. Ordinance 3270 December 1978
c. Pre-Cut International R-344-79
d. Ordinance 3308 April 1979
e. Ordinance 3338 July 1979
f. Ordinance 3469 September 1980
g. Anderson-Minietta R-013-83
h. Swales et al (Ord. #3814 ) June 1984
3. The subject site is in an area which is in transition from
older single family residences to commercial/industrial
uses , including but not limited to the following :
a. Pre-Cut International
b. Jim' s Disposal Service
c. Cummins Diesel
d. Wally' s Fabrication
e . Minietta Office Building
f . Maple Plaza Office Building
g. Sprout Office Building
Respectfully submitted,
WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES , INC.
grIAA)Vtik . lartert,
Larry M. Brown
LB:pjp 5. 31
13975 Interurban Avenue South • Seattle. \Va,hine16n9',I6', • (2(16I 241-1616
t7
InV7t, .."-- --pAr- •- : --- ,r_...„
OA-
4 . IN .
tit f r,5h. . h.k 1. i.-... .,. L l.J
erg 1'
w
ft 6.1, .. , • al-, *5 g.
a . • 4 I , .
to
L fi 0 7
jig
Ilifti 14A s
el sr.tago041,: r t 105
4 10 !
I
f;
t143° C • 41 0 '! :•
01:Irrifil 41' ft. 1$ "oho jellill. I. ._ ,
111 47 --
i- 4•11# 4„„
0 . 0.
I- 1 t‘i, L.tiv !flitt ilisi„,„„illio ii4 i :
i
LiphiL, .1.i ij i
1.111 sifs!!... .v,
i
4
1 MI
L.3
i
Nr% ••
S 1 .
11
1
wor:.
r:.,
milli ;..
I: -:-11 I' °
elf j°
11
Ail .
l.. .1.
51
1"::
1
ir L:
Ii• '
lig . II -
Ar - ill .
i : .. :,
s, .
0° gip . :;),LI.
747•6 .. ....-...0. . _ .. .- -- ...
11 0 d.,),„, , ...nal_
of ar
zal
l ‘Ag), L•7 W
r
r; 0°D -4P441ifi 14
il al
v sot
I ttt
j ri-rx.
Vil As(
1:41
v-sg ,GRP` JVNer,awrw
s fa AI
6 W' I
tit
diire,. 4
Ili 9 -
14 iiiiiiiiti.et4 Josisz S44 • ea, e.., MI
m
ss S r
S s b , ,
t2 T W ' 9 °
1b
1f A'
8 lik g 4 , .
rt 1 0 r
1111.1!.
IP;14
NI107 1 411 111. .4 0
1 3 s•
It
4. i 6 Y*
iiii
14
SI.
SS
14 ....
op__ IP& •.*
w
41tiessoiI40X! 4t-.
6'01 40/ . - .
6----.
iir;cal-le
7 -rt
a ::://
110 9 T
1
or
3 2 4 Si,4t77/9
4 f vet
41 , ...4., ' 6 / cots .
t r`a.,4„.......,
aptY 1
a E. • . 40. -E f,,
1
o
zi
AD
a
t ION 43 a+/f•
4,i__-----
8 3 t1 IDiIkr' 'A 44 i
1 GT Ai bolora •
pft 5 vi AD - ••••• • vs
lir. _
46 1 IA! .
SCHEDULE A
Commitment no. Effective date of commitment:
A-326776 U-10 AUGUST 8, 1984 AT 8:00 A.M.
Your no. : 326776-JF
Prepared for:
TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
TITLE E ESCROW
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
ATTN: JUDY FREDRICKSON
Inquiries should be directed to:
Ticor Title Insurance Company
1008 Western Avenue, Suite 200
Seattle, Washington 98104
1 . Policy or policies to be issued:
American Land Title Association
owners/purchasers policy - FORM B - 1970
Coverage: STANDARD
Amount : $30,000.00
Premium : $224.00
Tax 17.70
Proposed insured:
DONALD A. MOODY, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION
2. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in
this commitment and covered herein is:
FEE SIMPLE ESTATE
3. Title to said estate or interest in said land is at the
effective date hereof vested in:
CHRISTINE ALEXANDER MIGNACCO, SINGLE AT DATE OF ACQUIRING TITLE
A-326776 PAGE 1
4. The land referred to in this commitment is located in the county
of King, State of Washington, and described as follows:
LOTS 31 AND 32 IN BLOCK 17 OF C. D. HILLMAN•S EARLINGTON GARDENS
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, DIVISION NO. 1 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
RECORDED IN VOLUME 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
A-326776 PAGE 2
SCHEDULE B
1 . The following are the requirements to be complied with:
A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be
insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for
record.
11 Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain
exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the company:
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS:
1 . Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters,
if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching
subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the
proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or
interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment .
2. Lien of real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said
premises, if unpaid .
The property described lies within: RENTON
Present rate of real estate excise tax as of the date herein
is: 1 . 32%
3. RESERVATIONS contained in instrument
Executed by : CLARENCE D. HILLMAN
Recorded AUGUST 9, 1910
Auditor's no. : 698733
As follows:
ALL MINERAL RIGHTS RESERVED INCLUDING STONE IRON AND COAL AND THE
RIGHT TO MINE THE SAME
NOTE:
GENERAL TAXES, as follows , plus interest after delinquency:
For year Amount billed Amount paid
1984 98. 14 98. 14
Being County Treasurer's parcel no. 334040-2870-08
Note:
Said taxes as shown above include fire protection and/or drainage
assessment.
A-326776 PAGE 3
ALTA MATTERS:
The OWNER'S POLICY applied for will not insure against those matters
listed as additional exceptions on the inside back cover hereof.
NOTE: Investigation should be made to determine if there are any
service, installation, maintenance or construction charges for sewer,
water, garbage or electricity.
NOTE: A consolidated statement of all charges and advances in
connection with this order will be provided at closing.
NOTE: In event the transaction fails to close and this commitment
is cancelled, a fee will be charged to comply with the state
insurance code and the filed schedule of this company.
JC/ELG 512
A-326776 PAGE 4
Conditions and Stipulations
1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include included under the definition of insured in the form of
deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss
2. If the proposed insured has or acquires actual knowl- incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a)
edge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or to comply with the requirements hereof,or(b)to eliminate
other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage exceptions shown in Schedule B,or(c)to acquire or create
thereon covered by this Commitment other than those the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this
shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the
knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies
be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring
from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company provisions,the Conditions and Stipulations,and the Exclu-
is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If sions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies
the proposed insured shall disclose such knowledge to the committed for in favor of the proposed insured which are
Company or if the Company otherwise acquires actual hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of
knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, ad- this Commitment except as expressly modified herein.
verse claim or other matter,the Company at its option may 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the pro-
amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but posed insured may have or may bring against the Corn-
such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liabil- pany arising out of the status of the title to the estate or
ity previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by
Conditions and Stipulations. this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the
3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall provisions of this Commitment.
be only to the named proposed insured and such parties
Schedule of Exclusions from Coverage
THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE REFERRED TO IN PARAGRAPH 3
OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
OWNER'S POLICY FORM B-1970 LOAN POLICY
1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (includ- 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (includ-
ing but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) re- ing but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) re-
stricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or stricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or
enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimen- enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimen-
sions or location of any improvement now or hereafter sions or location of any improvement now or hereafter
erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in own- erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in own-
ership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land, ership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land,
or the effect of any violation of any such law, ordinance or or the effect of any violation of any such law, ordinance or
governmental regulation. governmental regulation.
2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of
police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights
appears in the public records at Date of Policy. appears in the public records at Date of Policy.
3. Defects, liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other 3. Defects, liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other
matters(a)created, suffered,assumed or agreed to by the matters(a)created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the
insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company and not insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company and not
shown by the public records but known to the insured shown by the public records but known to the insured
claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such
claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this pol-
icy or acquired the insured mortgage and not disclosed in
writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the
date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder;
c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, (a stock company), a California corporation, herein called the
Company,for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Sched-
ule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A,as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby
in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subjec to the
provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed insured and the amount of the policy or policies
committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company,either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or
by subsequent endorsement.
This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations
hereunder shall cease and terminate one hundred eighty(180)days after the effective date hereof or when the policy or Policies
committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the
Company.
TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
By NO President
Attest Secretary
i„elt2
COPYRIGHT,1966—AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
TO 2299 WA(10-83)American Land Title Association Commitment-1966
ENDING -
OF FILE
Fig TITLE. ,