LUA85-069 - Large Format

Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

/ 13

Entry Properties
Tags	x-robots-tag
Modified	11/23/2024 2:33:02 PM
Created	10/22/2024 4:28:01 PM
Path	\Department Folders\Community and Economic Development (CED)\Current Planning\Land Use Files\1985\LUA85-069 - Large Format
Template
No template assigned

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA85-011BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMED 1 Public Notice Public Notice Public Notice cJ NOTICE OF feet; located at the northeast corner of Plan and to complete an on-going processENVIRONMENTALMapleValleyHighwayandInterstajeHigh- of revising the entire Zoning Code; theDETERMINATIONway405. subject regulations will apply City-wide.ENVIRONMENTAL CITY OF RENTON, POLICY DE- Further information regarding this actionREVIEWCOMMITTEE WASHINGTONRENTON, VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT(ECF-014- is available in the Building end Zoning851Department, Municipal Building, Renton, yTheEnvironmentalReviewCommitteeManufacturingParkZoningRegulations. Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of I. L: 2 iERC) has issued a declaration of non- The subject project proposes changes to ERC action must be filed with the Kingsignificanceforthefollowingprojects: the M-P Zone to implement City policy as County Superior Court by February 25, i,('= t-;: LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY expressed In the Valley Comprehensive 1985. N.C., INC. (ECF-007-85) Plan and to complete an on-going process lP99PublishedintheDailyRecordChronicle, 7)Application for site plan approval to allow of revising the entire Zoning Code; the February 11, 1985. R9694. the construction of a multi-family complex subject regulations will apply City-wide. totalling 186 units,having 17 buildings and CITY OF RENTON, POLICY DE- a building for management and recreation, VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT(ECF-015- rfileSA-007-85;located on the east side of 85) Lake Washington Boulevard North at the Office Park Zoning Regulations.The sub- i, 2000 block. ject project proposes changes to the O-P Ls THE LUCKEY COMPANY (VICTORIA Zone to make the zone more useful City- F= 8 HILLS P.U.D.)(ECF-008-85)wide and to implement the Valley Corn- Application for preliminary P.U.D.approval prehensive Plan and to complete an on- t .t.,_kr •.to allow a multi-family complex having 196 going process of revising the entire Zoning units on approximately 16.47 acres of Code; the subject regulations will apply '.I0 'b a) property comprising 19 buildings and a City-wide. a) management office and a recreation cent- CITY OF RENTON, POLICY DE- p . .:2 p er, file PPUD-008-85;located south of S. VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (ECF-016- p ,p a b0PugetDriveandwestofBensonRoadS. 85) o 0 0% a and north of S.26th Street.Heavy Industry Zoning Regulations. The D .o p' 0DKBCORPORATION(ECF-011-85) subject project proposes revisions toteH- 0 0 U ro >; oApplicationforsiteplanapprovaltoallow1ZonetoimplementCitypolicyaso Q r the construction of an office/warehouse expressed in the Valley Comprehensive o building having approximately 110,000 Plan and to complete an on-going process _. a R. O ;asquarefeetona6.2 acre site(North Valley of revising the entire Zoning Code; the ` o bD w s. Business Park),file SA-011-85;located on subject regulations will apply City-wide. 2 s 0 D,1 cn ti 3theeastsideofWestValleyRoadatCITYOFRENTON, POLICY DE- t; E. co a- O V approximately the 3900 block. VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT(ECF-017- : c ill y b NIELSON & SMITH, ARCHITECTS 85) 10.,-4 s. C a - ..' + AND PLANNERS(ECF-012-85) Light Industry Zoning Regulations. The bp. w Application for building permit to allow the subject project proposes revisions to the L- sue„ ai N d Vim,, at D Uconstructionofa2-story office/retail- 1 Zone to implement City policy as CL cv 17warehousebuildinghaving11,984 square expressed in the Valley Comprehensive p at7sue., v' Paul I . Co v Q 0 s.., FM O w AP co to v, 1... .0 .. Z ce 3ce C no wo a) r7aa a) MCI rM o or.% A in coc o irJ w aUCOO t i., p' w0 U Si H a.r{ a 0 U LvN 'd a k ~' 10•5 r-1 I . O coON a g'Aa ° '0 a) w :o(1) v z.Offal rt) 3- o coMCIa '' ° A ' .o. Co CCS rio g-i -.9-, O.) cn 0 •-. ". '''' i.... 4a. cu i = S-. ,a E,c-.) a.) W ao Co tocn >; c Co c wws. +'a a aa) a) cc> I 5 - ( - AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AudreyDeJoie beingfirst dulysworn on oath states that RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER he/she is the Chief Clerk of the RENTON,WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING VALLEY NEWSPAPERSEW 7PAPERS EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RE- Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News NTON, WASHINGTON ON MARCH 12, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE Daily newspapers published six (6)times a week.That said newspapers FOLLOWING PETITIONS: PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Application for site plan approval to remod- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published el the interior of an existing warehouse building with 13,331 square feet of new in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King office space, and to add 110 new parking County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal stalls on the subject site, file SA-014-85; located at 33 S.W. newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for DKB CORPORATION Street. King County. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office/warehouse building having approximately 110,000 The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News square feet on a 6.2 acre site(North Valley Business Park),file SA-011-85;located on Journal , Daily Record Chronicle :{ , Daily Globe News , (and the east side of West Valley Road at not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its approximately the 3900 block. subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a INC OLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., Application for site plan approval to allow of Public l ie a Sa nts was publishedthe construction of a multi-family complex totaling 186 units,having 17 buildings and on 1.7—i, 1')85 79728 a building for management and recreation, file SA-007-85;located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and sum of artment.ALA NTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 1 MARCH 12, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director Published in the Daily Record Chronicle Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of ,;c149 85 . March 1, 1985. R9728 CleSSJ: Notary blic for the State of Washington, CIF;' 01'2 E 7 : 4 residing at Federal Way, 1 ; # IT , 77-7 King County, Washington. k p 1- VN«87 Revised 10%84 A P R 15 1985 I OF Rp THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o . wu ' ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co'FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 09grcD SEPV'Oc3 April 8, 19E 5 Mr. Robert. Fadden Lance Mueller & Associates 130 Lakeside Seattle, Washington, 98122 RE: File No. SA-011-85; DKE Corporation Dear Mr. I adden: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published on March 18. 1985 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK:dk 0844 cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 18th day of March 1985, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. A SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /9 4! day of 771Q,Qi i 1985. LQ0-19 ,,Q Z47.1-6 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at 1,r--e,. therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: SA-011-85 - DKB CORPORATION The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) 0821 March 18, 1985 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: DKB CORPORATION FILE NO. SA-011-85 LOCATION: East side of West Valley Road at approximately the 3900 block. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of a site plan to allow the construction of an office/warehouse building having approximately 110,000 square feet, on a 6.2 acre site (North Valley Business Park). SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approved. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on March 5, 1985. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 12, 1985, at 9:25 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and other documents pertinent to this proposal. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan. Exhibit #3 - Elevation Map. Exhibit #4 - Vicinity Map. The above exhibits were entered into the record, and Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator was called upon to present the staff report. He advised the subject property is one of the last developing parcels along West Valley Highway. Its frontage is on West Valley Highway, and is approximately 900 ft. deep. There will be a northern and southern access point, with circulation going around the entire building. The proposal is on a curve which will create a sight problem. Utilities are available to the site, and it was noted that this is the fartherest location from the fire station within the City, prompting an agreement with the City of Tukwila for first time response in the area. Mr. Blaylock stated there are parking stalls for 133 vehicles in addition to the loading doors which will be utilized for truck storage. There are large bays of dock-high service areas along the south face of the building where trucks could be stored, as well as sufficient area for the maneuvering of large trucks and automobiles. This proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan, access will be solely off of West Valley; the site has 375 ft. of frontage, and it is felt the northern most access has insufficient sight distance to be useable which will have to be omitted or modified to function as an emergency access only. The Zoning Administrator advised that if a portion of the building is converted it will be necessary to go through another site plan approval in order to recalculate the parking and be sure the uses are compatible with the zoning and Comprehensive Plan at that time. Continuing, Mr. Blaylock stated landscaping plans comply, but substantial amounts of evergreen materials should be supplemented by wildlife vegetation. The only issue arising is the question of access, and suggested the landscape plans be approved by the City's landscape architect. There were no further comments from staff at this time. DKB CORPORATION SA-011-85 March 18, 1985 Page 2 The Hearing Examiner called for testimony in support of this proposal from the applicant or their represenative. Responding was: Robert Fadden Lance Mueller & Associates 130 Lakeside Seattle, Washington, 98122 Mr. Fadden stated he has reviewed the staff report and advised that the landscape plans have been revised according to the comments of staff. The northern driveway on the site does have marginal sight distance due to the blockage from landscaping and the neighboring business structure. Sight from the south is very good and extends more than 450 ft. Because this is a project that has very little front yard parking, Mr.Fadden requested that the Hearing Examniner waive the front berming requirement so they can improve the sight distance even greater from both the north and south areas, out of the site, which will benefit both the private user on the site as well as the general public. They would wish to maintain the access from the north and would be willing to have only a right out access from that point. Mr. Fadden proposed the street tree plan be modified to allow a larger type of tree. They want to prune the bottom of the trees to create a high canopy which in turn would provide an improved sight line for cars that would not be interrupted. Mr. Fadden had no further comments. There was no further testimony in support of, or in opposition to this application. The Zoning Administrator had a final comment wherein he stated staff would have no objection to utilizing a right turn-in/out at the northern point, upon approval of the Public Works Department. The State of Washington, Department of Ecology, agrees that the shoreline permit issued on the previous project does not change the approval granted in 1982, and feels this is a revision and not a shoreline permit. With this in mind, the City will consider this a revision based upon the continued use and function of the previous approval and the Comprehensive Plan designation of manufacturing/industrial use for this area. There being no further testimony or comments from the audience or staff, the hearing was closed at 9:40 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, DKB Corporation, has requested approval of a site plan to allow construction of an office/warehouse building in the M-P (Manufacturing Park) zone. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit It 1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5.There was no opposition to the subject proposal from any member of the public. 6.The subject site is located along the 3900 block of the east side of West Valley Road. 7.The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 which was adopted by the City Council in April, 1959, as amended by Ordinances 1764 and 1928 adopted in May, 1959 and December, 1961, respectively. The site was reclassified to M-P, its current classification in July, 1974 by the enactment of Ordinance 2869, as amended by Ordinance 3166 adopted in November, 1977. Grade and fill was authorized by special permit (SP-760-74) in December, 1975. DKB CORPORATION SA-011-85 March 18, 1985 Page 3 8.The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of manufacturing park/multiple option types of uses but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 9.The applicant proposes constructing an approximately 110,000 square foot building on an approximately 6.2 acre site. The building will be a concrete tilt-up structure. 10. The building will serve both warehousing and office needs. Approximately 103,550 sq ft will be utilized for warehousing while approximately 6,450 sq ft will be used for office space. The entire complex will require 102 parking stalls while the applicant proposes 133 parking stall, 31 more than required. 11. The additional parking would permit conversion of some of the warehousing to office purposes in the future. 12. The applicant has agreed to increase the size of landscape materials to more fully harmonize with the large scale building, but the proposed landscape plans meet the minimum requirements of the 2% wildlife mitigation directive and the landscaping provisions of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. There was no authority cited to eliminate the landscaping berm. 13. The applicant proposes providing access to the subject site via two driveways. Traffic Engineering indicates that the sight clearance for the northerly drive is insufficient and would create safety problems. The applicant indicated a willingness to have the drive limited to right in/right out turning only, if that were acceptable. 14. The proposal will generate additional traffic although projections are not included by staff. Traffic analysis done for the Valley area indicates that saturation on area roads will occur within the next 10 to 15 years. 15. The subject site is within 200 feet of the Green River and is, therefore, governed by the Shoreline Master Plan, and the project is subject to final State approval. CONCLUSIONS 1.The proposed office/warehouse facility appears to serve the public use and interest. The development of the subject site will not only increase the tax base of the City but will provide additional employment opportunites in the Green River Valley Industrial area. 2. The proposed use complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park use, which includes warehousing and the obvious supporting functions provided by an office. 3.The parking proposed, and the size of the lot, would permit modification of the uses on the subject site and permit greater office usage. While staff generates concern over this issue, the applicant should be entirely free to develop the subject site as they see fit, subject to the codes and regulations of the City. Staff should, as they have, place the applicant on notice but should not endeavor to modify a proposal for some remote or speculative modification or future remodeling of the submitted proposal. 4.The northerly driveway will have to be limited to right in/right out to avoid anticipated sight clearance problems on the curve along West Valley Road. Such usage though will be further limited to approval of such right in/right out by the Traffic Engineering Division, and the northern driveway may be further limited as determined necessary by that division, including but not limited to total closure as safety warrants. 5. While traffic problems have been predicted for the Green River Valley Industrial floor, those anticipated problems have not been presented to the City Council as had been requested by the ERC. Until new policy, specifically regarding traffic has been formulated, this Office is compelled to apply the existing Comprehensive Plan which indicates the Valley is to be developed generally along the lines of manufacturing, warehousing, and office usage. Obviously since such development is anticipated, the large volumes of incidental traffic must have been included as part of such planning efforts. DKB CORPORATION SA-0l 1--85 March 18, 1985 Page 4 DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to approval by Traffic Engineering of the north driveway being limited to right in/right out, and subject to further determinations by that division that the driveway even so limited may still constitute a safety hazard which may be entirely eliminated, save for its necessity as an emergency access for the Fire Department. ORDERED THIS 18th day of March, 1985. Vat‘, FRED J. KA MAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 18th day of March, 1985 to the parties of record: Robert Fadden Lance Mueller & Associates 130 Lakeside Seattle, Washington, 98122 TRANSMIT TED THIS 18th day of March, 1985 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before April 1, 1985. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. t I F.3...., i, =i I.-'- - Iri et,1010""Pif. ,l_fer414,A I• A.t, 47. 1111 1 , , 1 1 , I I I I Irailz.-..., IMICANTIV 4 'f,. y;at-trgeli -..-!i171) Stera, gell;MN., m. 'mow... 1--1 1.4.19.9 pl.. 0 e-trot,roro..(fro) 7'AO-./FS i lilt i 1 ill Alk 4 ° It S.- AT , rf.,,...." .. ,..,1,..:.....o,fibzrillIr.s...4...... 1 mire_. ft. .. 7.I as1 :%*/ 3 itikli 7.1._.iii Emu', L.-i.... ,.....:: .1 i•..suselsireFigi, ilal41.i. 140.1 1 I I I ' Illifl • 111143'. 1 , , I it,4s-", , , , , , 4„L. 741 wtr, 411 1111 4 vi yip , ri , NW . I .j 111 I i 1• t I 1 I 111101 I eson,;NOMAgiiege 4140041.001161.21011, -'---' . *COW i AO L'a'A 4S 14, . '-'- '-- t--- -.-- Mika. --‘-• OCALA 1....,k0= Z.3 •.7 Landscape Notes Rant Scheckbe 0,,, erre.,.......eao•••-•7 4......,.:.•4.-......-Am"-7".. 0..1.......W.-....,...11.1..1.....,,,r•no,066.4......,_-• NY.- LO-1,i, 4 • e vscan 0....er..k...„.. r.......,... c0,-,....m..., 7.meroc,merorome. .x.......c e..........•••t•-t...Mr orossmos...roe)cam,. nrotroro.,AZ..../......,1.0-09. /1..ro-ro IV Mao.Ke.0.47.4 4.132 ....4Mr./4.340,mmel.17. DCA/.11.t•SUPC sea ,.....,... s, : 1%,; . :•'„Iro=„••I•si/C. :7".'1 :4r 77.. 1.0.14,....ormeros.,roro•••••••......77 rub•••••••••••:1 ob•:41•ol.........Amu=.....rbor12.:...a: tti1.1- Fr......1,:b•b..s.42,1-101!..1./roroOmmtfee Groes1 fele,cro, 3:1 t V.bb•••••••••.:a• ,...:11111i,„,,0111.."-...:'-• 4.: Anat.::,r:....1....H.4.444 Int Ay..14,0-0,&WA ttttt wItt•ru.S•....,. ..,.. i .SO.T.ai,t aii•,.).**1,1,,,%,NWoI.T..Tea.OT TO L1i.4:::•Mer:••••: 4.- t PA.M.... g. 0. ,. u.0.0-110 4r, . 0 0:1.4..-.44. r. o. a.,01.112.-A S.M.M. 1.3,,,,,,,,b,l..i.1-ekV- ,/Ga.14........M.• ,... 4, a 1 ,“••••1 am&au. , I •tier AT ImMity MM. 60....0,1401.0.1....MVO,^W............... .. 7o 12"Lem 10.0t•••E PM. rommes roc cmc asemmro ibt.44.,es-agaily,....../, rt-.,er-lo,4', .. iN lit ,n,.WOE yira mita. 01......er Mee:•.••••7::••••••••...c.fr...(bee tabr1.1-.1 Co.:bc•:.....an.c....1•.•••:vancr:esepann4 Au...,:: r:, ...1,-:Valb../...../.5013....COPY. e WANG".....•4,1!.......LA ....1.1....4re .,_ I'M% = 0 4.1:7".. ''.VTIO.X.I..4,1T..1.0 ep...w•V 01_4,Orr 1.41A., I.1 -en 1. Alr rr,;,:mr,h ii,.• AP n.n low row moo re:ut: nuliii.a. L.A.egke-Ant CZI,V.ACRIS.p....nan.4.411-••••••..AT•a•.-. 4. 1. r1.1,a-ea.-au.......1,1111-.1-.4.4.-i. Z• 1go11... unOmel a..war.. es sunr.WT.a S.Nat or oets 7-....l.f.,.1.4.10 C.JVH•b:N. 2 art.. 4.6 I?,AV.:..4,42,-Gr-0,-,.. 1 1 I Raw. 1.1...K Om... Cige• frtyco,(......+IoN,.../tIM-SC vs.Krell. MI.•,0' rtuttc...r V112.4-1.1.1 11-1.4b/1..KII•abl":1-,47.fa:.2•1: 1,11.• lb.:b•I re= II:c.•Vertsrtgr 7=:::::stirg Z:c.r:.. LLZtAre-o-I. m...46,r.....10/,,,411-,0 el-.t ON- .1.•0 c. 1 1-60e.o."re...L.ns/....11-1.1 tvr I'en, 1.1.0.4. rittli.:.alr.:',......w rowel. 901.6.11a viku Staking Details MR 11.0.5 MO 6 plos.., • . 11. 11 I r7.1 I 1,•• ..- 1111; L'"*"15.7% 3 4-:•• or- %.1.7.,-,,, gl r.,_=7" ............co...roros ro4MTtre.;" ''''2.j If. t...-: ,t,,..1,`.;:e• , ,-)) t' .S. t- woo.::::•co...4..0 rx.••••c.m•::c me T'r 00.1....Aft n4,1E. K. on••• swim Dots! Movina$trip EARTH ENTERPRISES Grating Detail l-I k aie...,—•llifilillilliiiiillasiliiiilia...L—..,.s.z......4.,,,;,.• ...,...,................,.;........ — I 1---...... n 1 • 4., 11 N• , ‘ 4 i 11 , 4.‘z‘. • 0 10: \ II.• s Ci\/ I' ---------- ---- I s . 11:11‘ktildbill61111111 'NI a I 4 li il yi7rI,I 1 i.., i 1 y t 11 \ .‘ ,,-, i is' i tn 1 r• 1 * a 1 ...,i- NI; ...._.......... 1;\ I( 2 tt .• i rI! P - . ...IC 1: il; 4 I 1 ss ':•-•,,,,, 4' I PI I1 I . -1-t I. •. k . I 41 ; ...2f... ;.'- 4. .....1 1 i ' it ' TIi - • ..-.; 1 r \f- 1 t ,1 It .\_, III 1 11!Ii 4-- s.... momIn!: I fe-, I ; II, 11 dc:i, IA i., , . i Rip,..,''-•.:*'-''''' :,-.0!,- i IIIIIIIIIxo-Pr" .- . , . ., _ 5CMSMATiC •14.40(3 AMC Mr/lrIll t•I:lerli VAIA-E-1 tiL;I: tencesaiPer kossf vAL.t.n:1- gaup rt- N'En,t-.1, kInksHlh441,,K1 d"—^ architects ale lao Ir...•...........swum•was am.Roam 'AVE WPC r,r" V I , I1 1• l ' Jlr.. — .-rNE IIy GC ..E.NR•• 1.1E O'ER O0•.1*.T1t)N CLMIn1 NO Jam.-- IJW! H-1 I I I G-1 III1 I 1 r 1 1*i/ I. I Ijl 1 I I 1 I • I 1 I r.i. i, II s w nsr si_ ) I 1 77 I i, il liId L Q_ I w. ! RD Sr 3 1 1i11 N. 1<1 Ir I I N I la IQ I-' I. 4 I S. W. I 111 I°f i it L• H 1 I 1 I1 V s T 11 O p W 1 7-Z W 1 w' I R a 1N J A S W 7N A / HW 7 g,/ Y H-1 3w -.T., 5"! 1 j, :,_>. 4 T________________. ,_„c_D__, __ _ SuQC ° G-1 J9. i . S. W. I 1 VI I I L M-P 1 a\ I - a -1 111I11II I Ii - 1f _ f •. I2 DKB CORPORATION SA-011-85 APPLICANT DKB CORPORATION TOTAL AREA - 6.2 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS WEST VALLEY ROAD EXISTING ZONING M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING WITH 110, 000 SQUARE FEET COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION COMMENTS yr FJ..1. ::• _._. r - 1 11'.` I 1•, ] :A +.._._''i f1f•. y r/ l.lri Hai VALLEY PLAN 1 • ;A LAND USE ELEMENT l1 i, EXHIBIT ' ' 10/84 f KEY s COM - Commercial P/QP _ Public/Quasi-Publica Aiic LP/1 Light Industrial HI Heavy Industrial 1Ote~' ,= , MP/MO - Manufacturing Park. L iii • I. Multiple Option C M E 1 R c REC - Recreation RE9 _ &\-- / - GB - Greenbelt 1 1- 4 1' 1 1 e to, -...+. .-'" '. 11 I . .•to . III 06,... -...- ...!.. ,.....--- lir. II' .. - ' ,z-,. .? ; 1 n.:::74' 1; u -``" i • I P J 1.•any CERCIA r I r ti ea a Mojiv 1 GB r.,.... fors 4 11.!'`7Y.!' 1/ 1 f - I. i , e - I I 1 10 r_. • . t ar..r.. I i,, ,g :,., . ., 60..MP/MO i w i illllP/ t. lam, CA -`6 ) OF RA, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Op MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 094T o SE BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 8, 1985 Thomas 2 ander Lance MLeller & Associates, Architects 130 Lakeside, Suite F Seattle, WA 98122 Re: DI,:B Corporation Dear Mr. Zander: The public hearing for the site plan approval for DKB Corporation is scheduled for March 20, 1985. However, in our final review, it came to our attention that the project itself is within 200 feet of the Green River. This will require that a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit be obtained. In 1981, a Shoreline Permit was obtained for -the then Industrial Park Company development (SM-94-81) to construct on the subject site. Since the project is within 200 feet of the shoreline, a Substantial Development Permit must be obtained for this development proposal. We have included the necessary application forms for that process. You should be aware that the process requires State concurrence before the City can issue a building permit. My general observation would be that I see no problem in issuing the permit, however, there would time restraints, approximately 100 days, because of the specific procedures in State law. The application is made directly to the City of Renton. It is processed locally and then sent on to the State. If I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me at 235-2550. Sincerely, I:ItCACF-S Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:1389L:c1 Enclosure 1358Z CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 12, 1985 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The ap3lications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearin; Examiner. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS application for site plan approval to remodel the interior of an existing warehouse building with 13,331 square feet of new office space, and to add 110 new parking stalls on the subject site, file SA-014-85; located at 333 S.W. 41st Street. DKB CORPORATION pplication for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office/warehouse building having approximately 110,000 square feet on a o.2 acre site (North Valley Business Park), file SA-011-85; located on the East side of West Valley Road at approximately the 3900 block. LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C., INC. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a multi-family complex totaling 186 units, having 17 buildings and a building or management and recreation, file SA-007--85; located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block. 1369Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 12, 1985 APPLICANT: DKB CORPORATION FILE NUMBER: SA-011-85 A.SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval of a site plan to allow the construction of an office/warehouse building having approximtely 110,000 square feet on a 6.2 acre site (North Valley Business Park). B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1.Owner of Record: North Valley Partnership 2.Applicant: DKB Corporation 3.Location: Vicinity Map Attached)Located on the east side of West Valley Road at approximately the 3900 block. 4.Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park 5.Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use; B-P, Business Parking: H-1, Heavy Industry; and, M-P, Manufacturing Park. 6.Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option 7. Size of Property: 6.2 acres 8.Access:West Valley Road 9. Land Use: Undeveloped 10.Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Industrial Uses East: Undeveloped Property, Industrial Uses South: Industrial Uses West: Undeveloped Property, Industrial Uses C.HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 1745 April 4, 1959 Corrected 1764 May 19, 1959 Corrected 1928 Dec. 12, 1961 Rezone (G to M-P) R-759-74 2869 July 22, 1974 Special Permit (Fill/Grade) SP-760-74 Dec. 8, 1975 Rezone (G to M-P) R-081-77 3166 Nov. 7, 1977 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1.Utilities: a. Water: There is a 12-inch water line along West Valley Road adjacent to the subject site and also along the south property line of the subject property. In addition, a 10-inch line is located near the north property line of the site. b. Sewer: There is an 8-inch sanitary sewer line along the eastern property line of the subject site. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water flows westward into the Green River via an existing storm water drainage system. PRELIMINARY REPORT — , HE HEARING EXAMINER DKB CORPORATION: SA-011-85 MARCH 12, 1985 PAGE 2 2.Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3.Transit: METRO Transit Routes #154, #158, and #159 operate along West Valley Road adjacent to the subject site. 4. Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1.Section 4-730, Manufacturing Park (M-P). 2.Section 4-744(F)(2), Green River Valley Landscaping Requirements. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1.Industrial Goal and Objectives, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 18-19. 2.Valley Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, January 1985, p. 31-50. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1.The applicant, DKB Corporation, is requesting site plan approval to construct a 110,000 square foot warehouse/office building on 6.2 acres in the 3900 block of West Valley Road. The tilt-up concrete structure will have approximately 103,550 square feet utilized for warehouse along with a 6,450 square foot office area located on the west end of the building. The site plan includes parking for 133 vehicles in addition to space in front of the loading doors which will be utilized for truck storage. 2.The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park - Multiple Option and the present Manufacturing Park zoning of the subject site. 3.Access will be solely off of West Valley Highway where the lot has approximately 375 feet of frontage. Two accesses are proposed onto West Valley Highway. However, the Public Works Department comments that the northern most access has insufficient sight distance to be permitted. That access will have to be eliminated and modified to an emergency access only or a different access point will have to be approved by the Public Works Department. 4.The site plan, as presented, provides for 133 parking spaces. Based upon a division of 6,450 square feet per office and 103,550 square feet for warehouseing, the required parking would amount to 102 parking spaces. Maximum utilization of the building would be for 13,500 square feet of office and 96,500 square feet of warehouse based upon the present configuration of parking. However, it is anticipated that if the building is converted that under the provisions for new site plan approval, additional parking could be provided in areas presently utilized for loading and unloading of materials. 5.The landscaping plan complies with the Parking and Loading Ordinance and the 2% requirement for wildlife mitigation. Substantial amount of evergreen materials have been utilized, but it appears that the materials may be slightly undersized for the bulk of the building. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the site plan approval request, file SA-001-85 for DKB Corporation, be approved subject to the following conditions: 1.Approval of the northern access by the Public Works Department or modification to an emergency access only. 2.Approval of specific landscape plans by the Landscape Architect. r1 'SOU ir.1.44 III'I Ui _ 1 .. .,a, r‘E_ .PE NATION CL•,, r,-+ 0 J„ Li H—1 I I 0 I I G_1 1w...vca I 1 1, \I I T I 1i. 1 II v m I k I 0 s r_ 1,sr sr•}J d1• I I 131J c 4 1 p Itl I i w. 1 RO sr 3` — 0. V 131 Ii Ia a S. w I I, I I0f I 1 I M—P l l I II W y 1 1 1 IrIi ' W ly u ' I j 1 I 1 1 I l p W rM C is W : it I' S w 79p. S — r-f— v i)J f SuC/2"41 ° I 7______ g G-1 S—W I M_P z I ; j_.1L-1 i ksiiiiiiihk Hi __ PiDKBCORPORATION SA—011-85 APPLICANT DKB CORPORATION TOTAL AREA — 6.2 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS WEST VALLEY ROAD EXISTING ZONING M—P, MANUFACTURING PARK EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING WITH 110, 000 SQUARE FEET COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION COMMENTS F.1i _1 •Y.• , , r+t.a/.:":st C 1I VALLEY PLAN 41 LAND USE ELEMENT I .;• . EX}IIBIT "A" t 0/84 L 44ft KEY COM Commercial de' I P/QP - Public/Quasi-Public LI Light Industrial 1. t r • HI Heavy Industrial I, MP/MO - Manufacturing Park441( Multiple Option ii M E T a REC - Recreation A I ' f. GB - GreenbeltREC-- p/Qp 0r 7 I •,10,i 41 .dor!...114 7:1 ...- 7: P/M0-0 1 • -..--, - -1 II 1....j n v. _•!.-_`.. 4'.• .. _ > - - -?`1. e I _ I i it J—. 1. .r.< I , I I t Q ; -raj •-• / k_- CO MdVEPCIA i iIi' y_ I. 3- t L;;I _'•.».. 0 .r. I (C1 i - - __ Pi g. 7 . MO 411P/SAC)I Fl r - . it 1 I 1' I 1 • 1 1 • 4 . . .,, : 6usoix MP/MO c.. , !, , •7-_:.....eree.. I A .if • . i ____ I 1 IM MP/ , it .. . . . . . _ . . ._, ",.-®_... t - a•' _. 1 t_—,-*:\; MO I MP/M 'V I e .I l T r1..+r. . 1. L. II' 1' I 1 vn.l OA... 4.77-44,rulct-.`.. VIGI1,11?`r'.t`4f` •• N >w.,.h II ' ' IIII 4,$ 10. i/ -i...) 1_—----I 11- e I \ / I OG1 / 1 X i't_ T E Iii -. .L/ g n. uu.-- V IL L L anii i. 9 i- I I E...rl.a S'.JUt--_ r TSr 7.Q i W l I - n+r.c.1+1.LK TT r ttaL rr.r . i ' y W.s , I i. ' , r • 1 I y ' , .lam i LI -- I I I Iw I•E I F t l r.'s,. 4--,NrtuLv CCOPic t-sP.-1re,ri• er 14..EI.>w/ 4..,,..cr N e ORM 3 iu OOENOTES SITE ("LANWk i 1.6G- VIOL r'•v • 0.44.1.T %-t N TT4-SNKa.e.V N ... Y TTPt• St rvNe OisTR.•mt. LE4x\L OESGCIITION The sNVfl. 04.EK.LET 01 TN.T Ib(fl' rX 0/4.40 n44r W 7 r•1 SEG,t.. tc.7.4004 P yS I.yoeT11 RAI,I frsr, 9.41.tnw0 TE.LTwN.u4W 4iNER 164.T.a....T r 4t C Al 11.1.....07n. .T 14.0..0.0Teo NOEt loneretOFDur{ .YJ.74e/16.1. LrGEPT fit E..4T K.feet+.'EPJo1 ft.(4.n0,..10 I...//In:4r..10 ijLEICIe T w ..•..•.. v _. v1I3r9Y710JAI3de713n30sewtwsos••s.rv.........•......es. 011-11 I ...At71dxNIS/ldJ-3`W\H1210N A .. enP1O ©I„ 1.,yPIMPpesaft ...4in,I1Pt, ii!31.,11oJtVw ti—_ I si 5 Ihi I a# II s4— 1 II I 3Ni1 .4,1V,II1 111 I! i1• I iI O1 —1 o1 9 i D 1 z.i. iII I c N Z1s1 I c Ir1—— --- II ; 4 1I _i1 e.,111A,OMN —eft:.KP,'„ i 1 I 1 i 1 f 4 t. i 1 IA 1 1 i 1111 1 Vir1114 1 L-,-...... 0 I I 1 1 111I1 I S7ir /2- T 401 1.4111111• P. ....eKil. ist 41A4......... a. . 111.11 7 it 1s._1 IP.'4147 ilhelliallH1 SI :il Calit'IVAllAr.'ilk, . . JIM Onlil IMF : • .il i.... 1 4'i,. 2 N 1 I 0' 1 , 1 i I 1 1 . , i i I , i a i ' i I Iii-•, , , i • III Nat ' . ' . klailIZAtiitiailirijaillaWalwalibW0110,6•f_iiiiPill'O;edi-: ..isicii,4 444,...--,t....re kagwom;:•IlingiVi.VIVIVAILia:iFiout2fign,g,iv2amii ergiosp -or,j1 to 44 1 ,0 P EV.4.1.41 r...40,-o" 3 :- Landscape Notes Plint ahead* 4........0........'n.e. 01.1.0.06110•41•10 6.00•460010.110*V. N..... .:24.1,... 01......,,...e.l•C.A..,•••LL•0-14 M.. w...s An 606. ,Iik,K. y..maw 6.0U.00.10611.0.061 10-/..a.a.twadoin...,...101)M.P. Kg/.or..LC.1AM 11.CP v.+esr./PrIW•••••••-i• LP CAL, r-Z not ram 661061 TV:"".1."":I.. wok-..--......•••••010•••••/I 40.016 APT.ir0.00.00•662..00..... WS.46 16001•••••.....10011r...1.14.4.1 ri-•....,Mr."•••06 1...••••••••••••Kau.................ar........... . 66.......6 6.-66.6a.,466,•/.,...1.-416,-,C....1 174.4/. 0 CAR..-I. ef.X411.1.0.'rewncr,r.: c.a..4...-MIL. 3./ c V 11-."""'" V 1.44..I.I.K. KiK--011W-1 1.4.4... I / ..:, ...on.o..*...11.4•................,MO.. r%.,...x.,....v..Mr....120.b,/ I*sw...met.L. 1 •coo.10•••••••01••• 0.•••••000./..0006 6.76.0•0...6666.666.14.0.61.00 li 1 I .:‘ 1111 BIM"i. „„ 60.al•••••re of.00, vim. ••••••1' I I, . W'm.10'.0•—1.0.11.IV .166,400.66.. 0. 16. 0.. 107‘, 0100, 41.66 06./6•..60.00100..0666646004101600. 1.0 4040.• 0. 0• 0•.•-0• 0.•06••00•.••.m•,/ 601.00.-6100.+.•.• 6•..•...,.1....-..06.0, ft90i 1( irr.A. 00 y T . , 1^..,.....* i. 4..../,....,.- /v. il. 1 y,.,t660. I L i . 0 Aii :•:: favz,vo.......,-+''=.0.0011../...1,....• me-w, iL6.•p a..." 1 1 40.0.6616 6.66,66 r3 'II=..:.:::: 1-L.....,fta PALA.11.,Pt.,.Jr.O.A.X.O.C.- t.."7...1.2.,'1.4 0 C.04.1..0.4. 2.Gem Q2CD 1.1/11V...GA......M.11-..../rhc.ric.vwx r-romus WIA, . P'1.0.1 et,4 i N. ‘21......4 T.44,/ 1:.7.-.1.'VotruiT "016.60.0 MKS 011•0•.1.3.••••••5M 122.0 C.. 1161•01616 MO•••••••Iva 1.6.661 Elie0.06.1...E.L.4%/E. ..00."g..I NT I' 201.O.L. Ll!=arare:X XL........1.• 1..---____ Staking Den* 6 WU. • 1. 4 1 y 10.• , ,.6 ,. , IW Ntk.• 6024.6.60164.11 .. 1.•01400.0 60.160, 721F2: 0...!,:.•6'I 9 1,..,........--...._ ,-r•S=P:411.s. 11•0•411 IQ ma 0 01...• VI.WO, za !. 1..e.„,......a t....„,,...4.,....a 304011111 DWI) Mewina Slit EARTH ENTERPRISESiradlliPetia F...i"."*- A allIMMON1111011.1111166111111"111Additilt i..aLaW•-•••-44.1,-.• 2.J.Jou...•.-••.A. • or... Ii AI-- 1 • F011011Nb-- '''•'- s. I N* 4, li 4. . •••• a I i I ea'. I Ia . I ol 11 le I IT I., / 0, , I tz s ,_, /, 1 II -c -I.N ' 1 r 1 I I 4 1 I 0 . t!...i.r Lr. --1--.1 III J 1 113 2 1,1 / 1 sh lc •h. t 1 1,1 it (I 1 4. i A / i I 1 1 i 4.• a----- '\\ t I \ , k I i I r 1" I : I1 1 , • li s I! e \( sill 11hhamuwie,'IrviarellilEltIliIIMINIIIIII .. - - - 13 -, /".,:• "r- 1 1 ii i f` i e• „. -.;•^...441'.'..'f '''''- I SCM1b.•TIC •11.40“ A MO II7/1.1,111_ I Her architects aim rN(Jnf VAL-1,5-1 4SIL;I:ir:-_,; Ef:.I X wa4r ...4.5.14..t-r R..^.4, e-gNVNI, L•14...S HINI..1-r-,N swam sea..•SON vrvE LOPE tr GP 1 ^. - 1 i. 9 0 0 i,...., i) C t TiI /odor Ilavuvics% I 1 I I6=... 4".* lIt,,, ,r, Ifffb.i5------ v..... 1 i LL: _ . ,_-_+__ __,_.1 ,TH• 1 7_ 411Fz-_______ _. t-en 6,!1",......_.,„_'''';'^‘' Immo&aw Lek. 4....rtiullbn efirl.fie.n.rei t4 iv. Rom ils, OW/4 1110.0 41114 alf gX1X'brz, 4 it ii'41,Lurifnuf..1 ...,,'"fifof41. Palii 0 I I I I I 1— — Apo,•,)riAtl...4 C. 61.,4 riOtrlo SOUTH E40EVOMON T T T 0 0 I T 1 1 i__ __4__ ._ , f o I --- --- — to•rept salt.lelled-- f1 ke-isrn---44,,91' ------'— i6 77--- ree Wm Palit#Mfg. 4,1664rfef..,..4,040 aa....4 NU&Alava; 1 T T T P 1) N isor b 1,.. *06. i 1 - II i e MM. OM j MEM 17 I in tg 2 1 60.1.9•01.Mao Ulfe.f.hoRTH EtZvATiori I 1 J-E-L 110f TTT 4,......,..: 44- •--,-- . 1 11 i i" 1 fid11_1_1 I WE CT ELEVAT ION miter",rifift41 EA E-t-eN/A-noN 1111I i i I L . 1 A- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV ON : ?L- ) L APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS L]"NOT APPROVED r DATE: SIGNATURE OF I ECTOR OR AU ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVSSICM d>/': - REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED t/Ce-Tevr-101,;) e-ex4-;44,-161.(g 4 406 Qit24 s 04 .4Pt42710--r,c)( 443,2 CI d-t; eiPt elA 4011,14144 Crte"-' Ajti ra^ifk. ct't4 Ade.kt,t)al- DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIS!O!1 S!S`_ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : OAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED 77 I i,4..E_ .s' .feT/97-E'40 c/ <<1 6, 5 Si-`- eVy l).e Z,V.7 DATE: cTr,NATrrr a n RtTTf1R DR/AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION;-- --- LAM ROVED PROVED WITH CONDITION;;Li NOT APPROVED DL" Irk) t'. I• r' T' 1-7 I7 c"2 1/L'. e c ,1 I > ", l 1 i 5 T' 1 t v., i-c 3:t c4 c' chi ' }-tea, . ? , ;- k.'S 2 t r G t 11'> F-c, c C'5141E.d 5v t• , ,/t A 9w DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR A RIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIS!C S/1 c f.! REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7-/i-/-Ty ,EA / APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS E NOT APPROVED W&c° LA-A/5 I UTILITY APPROVAL SMELT E LATE COMERS AIREEMENT • WATER S 14/-5/9 01/04_02F:63 ft ct 1 G d'Z' '"`2- . LATE COMERS ANREEMENT • SEWN p SYSTEM REVELIPMENT CNA /E • WATER yas , 0.04lsQ.Fr.x //D ODO so.Fr" 4.411/400. 62 SYSTEM IEVEIIPMINT CHALICE • SEWER y.&5 'o.04154.FT. X_ " 4DD • ° 6 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • WATER AiD SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • SEER N0 APPROVED WATER PLAN Ye 5 APPROVED SEWER PLAN 7 APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS IY FIRE y 5 nu FLOW ANAL IS y65 w2t DATE : Z/ 7 /8S SIGNATUE OF DIRECT R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISdt:i?I ;:/ "` REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED 3 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED e."..1"---71-r.,(-- 6"-"-/ele-/--e --Arv•- V el,- o`T-- e-';$ Pam- ---o2 w ,/,:ems .-3-„e7-'- z,// c DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV1JIJN ;4,0.dG El APPROVED RPPROVED VITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED fr#01.104:6&Q" e/1)(141 "j4f" 1/1"Idtg . i 4 digita_ 7- 4SIGNATU' OF DICTO' RIZED REPRESENTATIVEATE: REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : e1444,49 OAPPROVED 21FPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED 161-2)L4,etiar- zfi<< DATE : ( 8 8 SIGNA U' OF 'VECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISIO`! Z 110r 060ON CITY OF RENTON DETERIVIINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-•011- 85 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-O11. 85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office/warehouse building having approximately 110,000 square feet en a 6.2 acre site (North Valley Business Park). PROPONENT: DKB Corporation LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the east side of West Valley Road at approximately the 3900 block. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead mency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There 13 no comment period for this DNS Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235- 2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to fling County Superior Court no later than February 25, 1985. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Ren..on, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: February 6, 1985 PUBLICATION DATE: February 11, 1985 onald G. Nelson ry • Spr Building and Zoning Director Policy DeveloprMnt Director Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director 1357Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS RE aULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON MARCH 12, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Application for site plan approval to remodel the interior of an existing warehouse building with 13,331 square feet of new office space, and to add 110 new parking stalls on the subject site, file SA-014-85; located at 333 S.W. 41st Street. DKB CORPORATION Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office/warehouse building having approximately 110,000 square feet on a 6.2 acre site (North Valley Business Park), file SA-011-85; located on the east side of West Valley Road at approximately the 3900 block. LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANYN.C._LINC. Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a multi-family complex totaling 186 units, having 17 buildings and a building for management and recreation, file SA-007-85; located on the east side of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 12, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : MARCH 1, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANE!TE SAMEK-McKAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, i.n and for the State of Washington residing in ! Q.-,J on the 1st day of March, 1985. SIGNED: OF .R4-,A I,BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT21 zr' f RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR p grim MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9-0Co' 0, 9g7-FO SEP E O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 4, 1985 DKB Corporation Attn: Joe Mitter 401 Second Avenue S., Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office/warehouse building having approximately 110,000 square feet on a 6.2 acre site (North Valley Business Park), file SA-011-85; located on the east side of West Valley Road at approximately the 3900 block. Dear Mr. Mitter: The Cit:/ of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 23, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for March 12, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincereli, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:cl 1371Z OF v" ry ,, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTU RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O o ' ` MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 0, 9gT6-0 SEP1 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 4, 1985 North Valley Partnership Attn: Joe Mitter 401 Secord Avenue South, Suite 200 Seattle, VIA 98104 Re: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office/warehouse building having approximately 110,000 square feet on a 6.2 acre site (North Valley Business Park), file SA-011-85; located on the east side of West Valley Road at approximately the 3900 block. Dear Mr. Mitter: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 23, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for March 12, 1985. 1 he public hearing commences at 9:00 a.rn. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger . Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:cl 1371Z-2 OF i?4,./1/ A. F>; `'`'P. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTU4$ ` ' - Z z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR mil O A ry MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 A 0 0 SEP1 00 BARBARA Y. ;HINPOCH MAYOR March 4, 985 Thomas Zander Lance Mueller & Associates, Architects 130 Lakeside, Suite F Seattle, WA 98122 Re: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office/warehouse building having approximately 110,000 square feet on a 6.2 acre site (North Valley Business Park), file SA-011-85; located on the east side of West Valley Road at approximately the 3900 block. Dear Mr. Zander: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 23, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land USE: Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for March 12, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:cl 1371Z-3 OF / 3' 0 h ciTicE ItE) SEP-0 N" City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON ARCH_12, 1985 BEGINNING AT9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: SA-0ll-85 F. REZONE From To Li SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To_ SITE APPROVAL 1 SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots H PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM H GENERAL LOCATION AND/DR ADDRESS : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION SIGNIFICANT IXNONniSIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS ICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT A PROPER AUTHORIZATION RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEN MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 011 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : DKB CORPORATION PROJECT TIT-E ;NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 270,000 SQUARE FEET ON A 6.2 ACRE SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/6/85 DEN3INEERING DIVISION I ( TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ri FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT EBUILDINC & ZONING DEPARTMENT F-1 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR S .JGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 ; 00 P ,M, ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5 , 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED l, 105cptpiNx), WIL- -1FE m111G0N'C1ON' t-l-oU.,O 11v(.-LAAO I 5 1Z AvU G tZ2- S--F Z. f3., C o1'o t//As1eK, CAZscpry G'r R M . i 2, fIR A )O Ran LOCH specIds, I ' t, Sra Ai f inA)/i1 a > IN)-co ; u Na(OcR.)iu)u r)c \ iZ1,G) I ONi t-A t(z.6ic) Fok— 1 LU ?LNt y1InUG Paek5e, DATE ; f}q . </ M `/ SIGNATURE OF DIIECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI AENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 011 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : DKB CORPORATION PROJECT TIT -E :NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPPOVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 110 ,000 SQUARE FEET ON ACRE SI:'E. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : L PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/6/85 LENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : l ( UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT DIPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS ;_ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5 , 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; G•E&O 2 0 APPROVED RA13PROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Ili/load D#14,44;e4,0_,0( 6 4 lst 42€.4-4l "(-!mot/ Q_Ge' de-2),,, Afar, i- 441 .DATE : 8 d SIGNA U• OF D °ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REW'IA-.,w RENTC BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI RENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 011 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : DKB CORPORATION PROJECT TIT_E :NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 270,000 SQUARE FEET ON 777 ACRE SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : LI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/6/85 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : EUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT EIBUILDINC, & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ell POLICE LEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SJGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , 'LEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5 , 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION) 7&el 1 ti te r' Y / K9 DIWPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ej NOT APPROVED o - 1,5604,ac, 4 jaw e,ty,44,_, tVThSt -11 e-1-17) d f bav etiOv s dtst ` 1` f .- i Dv' e 10 p -`e',.o j-1.cz v v i./ kS 4o t L a a I-f-Pa-,. 4 ` 1,':'S s . 4 r v For 5 e a w}- 5 9e E c 4 S; 97 f V*3 DATE ;_ / 2. e.Z ' i SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR A RIZED REPRESENTATIVE RKvr. er! ?5i111R9 RENT( BUILDING k ZONING DEPAI RENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 011 — 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : DKB CORPORATION PROJECT TITLE ;NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK BRIEF DESCRJPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 110,000 SQUARE FEET ON A 6.2 ACRE SITE. LOCATION ; LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : 0 PUBLIC 4ORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/6/85 E ENGINEERING DIVISION FITRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : SUT]:LITIES ENG , DIVISION 7, FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS :__ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , FLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5 , 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7I /?y E,V6I ,E,21/G DAPPROVED F-1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EINOT APPROVED W cc:o °OF^/S f UTILITY APPROVAL SUOIECT if 1 LATE COMERS AMREEMENT - WATER ES W--5/9 $10, 5;47E'S3 71D h-J-4441.4-14.tii- C . LATE COMERS AIREEMENT - SEWER No SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CNAIIE - VOTER yos $o.04/sQ.FT•X NO,000 sQ.Gr. = $4 400. 62 SYSTEM IEVELIPMENT CMARBE - SEWER yes 5Tp.o4jsQ,FT. x " 4, l-¢ 00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CNAR6E • WATER No s$'e, (60. vo SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SEER Ajo APPROVER WATER PLAN y6 S APPROVED SEWER PLAN APPROVED FIRE NYDRANT LOCATIONS YE5 IT FIRE . FIRE FLOW ANAL IS y65 0.) 2 7 /5c p,.. L DATE ; SIGNATURE OF DIRE('—4 AIITHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVJSIOP.1 RENTC BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI RENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 011 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : DKB CORPORATION PROJECT TIT_E :NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 270,000 SQUARE FEET ON A 6.2 ACRE SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/6/85 EIENGINEERING DIVISION DTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SLGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , FLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M , ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5 , 1985. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED S O`^ 6J nr ram va e_ - DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RFVIenfM , .; r , RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI VIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 011 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : DKB CORPORATION PROJECT TITLE :NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 110,000 SQUARE FEET ON A 6.2 ACRE SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/6/85 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION F-1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ElBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT t IPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS :_ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON TTJESDAY, FEBRUARY 5 , 1985. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :6LT) APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS r-] NOT APPROVED a f6DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUT ORIZED Fr-PRESENTATIVE REviSicM . ! RENTC BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI IAENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 011 - 85 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : DKB CORPORATION PROJECT TITLE :NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 270,000 SQUARE FEET ON A 6.2 ACRE SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/6/85 DENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : I ( UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDINC & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY EEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS :_ COMMENTS OR SJGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , 'LEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5 , 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ETA;PROVED DAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Gc1/440, 42,ktjfeje_ e_61 DATE : 4 /S g5 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIsI!Th 5 ". r RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA 1AENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 011 - 85 APPLICATION NC (S) : SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : Da CORPORATION PROJECT TITLE :NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK BRIEF DESCRIP ION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 110,000 SQUARE FEET ON A 6.2 ACRE SITE. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2/6/85 EIENGINEERING DIVISION l lTRPFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : E UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 11FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT 11POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5 , 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED a?‘40‘, /41 _,/y% o? G TC 2 Ss';Eh-t5 i2E /l7,E'/¢i T -71=. e;.-'71,2z;- DATE : ")-- 5 SIGNAL E D CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE p ICu1 /I n," 0600N T CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONM3NTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF- 011- 85 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-011- 85 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of an office/warehouse building having approximately 110,000 square feet on a 6.2 acre site (North Valley Business Park). PROPONENT: DKB Corporation LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located on the east side of West Valley Road at approximately the 3900 block. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead tgency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235- 2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to King County Superior Court no later than February 25, 1985. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building arid Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: February 6, 1985 PUBLICATION DATE: February 11, 1985 onald G. Nelson Larry . Springer U Building and Zoning Director Policy Developritent Director Richard C. Houghton l Public Works Director NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. SA-01 l-85, FCF-011-85 PROPOSED ACTION APPI ICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BLDG., HAVING APPROXIMATELY 11,000 SQ. FT. ON A 6.2 ACRE SITE (NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK) GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS LOCAILD ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK, POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE C E.R.C.] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILLJWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE Kimr; Cni IhVTY SuPERInR rn IRT BY 5:00 P.M., FEBRUARY 25, 1985 v FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION RONhENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1512CAILADWGI ' ZO0INC1 - DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 5, 1985 ECF - 011 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: DKB CORPORATION PROJECT TITLE: NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 110,000 SQUARE FEET ON A 6.2 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6.2 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 110,000 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals ' 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: 1 1 DNS n MITIGATED DNS 1 EIS REVIEWED BY: ai7(,-, DATE: FORM #14 RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: LY TIC., I'f IDS. DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 5, 1985 ECF - 011 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: DKB CORPORATION PROJECT TITLE: NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 110 ,000 SQUARE FEET ON A 6.2 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6.2 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 110 ,000 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 1 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals ' 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ii7 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 1 RECOMMENDATION: 01 DNSal I n MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY: 4, TITLE: (/T.L./Ty .EA/{/A/FF,e/, c DATE: 2/ 7 /tc FORM #14 RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Sill REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: POLL/ 2D OrM if CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 1 85 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 5, 1985DATE ECF - 011 - 85 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(s). SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: DKB CORPORATION AN 2 1985 PROJECT TITLE: NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK POLICY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 270,000 SQUARE FEET ON A 6.2 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6.2 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 270,000 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation C 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: r1—DNS I—I MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: (5cve/4 70n Sev! TITLE: 45 3i'S` d Pa`Clf"--- DATE: 2f6/Q --- FORM #14 IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: [ 01•Vrt DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 1. 1985 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 1?. 1985 ECF -010 _ - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-010-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: CROWN POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT TITLE: CROWN POINTS APARIMFNTS BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX HAVING 200 UNITS WITHIN NINE, 212 STORY WOOD STRJCTURES PLUS A RECREATION BUILDING AND A SWIMMING POOL. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF N.E. 4th STREET AT THE 3700-3800 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 8 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals • 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Ligrt and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Trarsportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: n ga9kAll- d-74/41'XC-- 4e- e--4°'d'' ---- 19m--1-44:44at5 aidet.he-pi,..x ,,,e,,ii- 6.4 104,0,4..t:ded a-t Tpurt-(2 RECOMMENDATION: DNS MITIGATED DNS 1 EIS REVIEWED BY: ' 17e(e4a1111661.TITLE: ir DATE: vl- 7-A FORM 1114 RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: GIJ(lit Nik*/ DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 5, 1985 ECF - 011 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: DKB CORPORATION PROJECT TITLE: NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE l/ 7 Don CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY SQUARE FEET ON A 6.2 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6.2 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 270,000 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use c/ a 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation c/ 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: c't s c4L, Grp RECOMMENDATION: El DNS n MITIGATED DNS fl EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: FORM #14 RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHI Renton Fn i El Frs Prevention Bureat1REVIEWINGDEPARTMENT: -I-IM {RvEN-f IOt c DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 1985 COMMENTS DUE. I ! '`_''CRC ER ECF - 011_ - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: DKB CORPORATION IAN, 2, 4 19$5 PROJECT TITLE:NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 110,000 SQUARE FEET ON A 6.2 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6.2 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 110,000 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals ' 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: e406), . l o. ,er ,%>E Ejs77 4,(c cSGc) c_S'cTi d c 7 G i7-7'.. 1/4.230 2 /541 -42 W/- 2 ' ,e. SJo(.JS ' -2 i/14ES frea,X i, f 7- •p4)72. /.F',. / 1-7e4.0 x e'E/ C.o",--f .ic .o&o II i /7 LI7..'ibf 74/, 1 t 2e z C-'ice?" /4f i/Lic;'‘--,9 s+J 7'c`. >.'/2. - .2o'-,'E'C T%o it.) ze P' y0 77-cAt l/v S7,,e/f/"CLC• N "7—r. A ", ., v>26,o F,,e Gc7L. RECOMMENDATION: DNS n MITIGATED DNS 1 EIS REVIEWED,BY: 7-'i 1,,,1 f/ TITLE: ' V7a/f DATE: o- >` - ''-FORM #14 RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW St REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: $..l645 DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 5, 1985 ECF - 011 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: DKB CORPORATION PROJECT TITLE: NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY 110 ,000 SQUARE FEET ON A 6.2 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6.2 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 110,000 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals ' 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: a< < J AN 26 15 BUILDiivQ/LuivtNG ()LPr. RECOMMENDATION: DNS El MITIGATED DNS I EIS REVIEWED BY: r7TITLE: DATE: V ^ FORM #14 IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I KAf f I L DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 24, 1985 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 5, 1985 ECF - 011 - 85 APPLICATION NO(s). SA-011-85 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: DKB CORPORATION PROJECT TITLE: NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING HAVING APPROXIMATELY .2 ;6OU SQUARE FEET ON A 6.2 ACRE SITE. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AT APPROXIMATELY THE 3900 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 6.2 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 270,000 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS ADEQUATE INADEQUATE 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals ' 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing z 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation L 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: C __._/ AG/ /•epC] C fIce Jc'1>C'P- E/ i h c-T e c CZ/ Zjv r e ciy l/Tsof,arbc? uS G+- i /!( Cr' 1 A-27 RECOMMENDATION: Fr DNS MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: d--;-A-1-),ITLE: DATE: 1`-d L/ /? 8 V FORM #14 1 Q t..1 1 I Vr JXL IN I. '.Jlr n E LDING & ZONING DEPARTP iT 5 A - o l/-g5 IR • ECF- Di/- ,PS 14- __ N`.s0 MASTER APPUCA11ON NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME DKB CORPORATION FEES ATTN: JOE MITTER Q REZONE*(FROM TO ADDRESS 401 - 2nd Ave. So. , Suite 200 ED SPECIAL PERMIT* 3 TEMPORARY CITY Seattle, Washington ZIP PERMIT* 98104 O CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* LEJ SITE PLAN APPROVALS 1 a°,.TELEPHONE n SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL206) 467-5544 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VAFroNCS* I From Section: Justification Required NAME THOMAS' ZANDER LANCE MUELLER & ASSOC./ARCHITECTS ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 130 Lakeside, Suite F 2:3 SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP 0 Seattle, Washington 98122 TENTATIVE PLAT Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 206) 325-2553 E] WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME NORTH VALLEY PARTNERSHIP PLAT NAME: ATTN: JOE MITTER ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 401 - 2nd Ave. So. , Suite 200 a PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL Seattle, Washington 98104 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 206) 467-5544 El Residential 0 Industriol QCommercial Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS foo L -1 \fficLei ROAD . Q RELI EXISTING USE RESENT ZONING 1:::] PPRELIMMINEINARY Vacant MP ED FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Office/Warehouse NUMBER OF SPACES: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE a1 D O'O SQ. FT. ACRES i j.,AREA: 270,000± 6.2 TOTAL FEES I I oiTr or nc-ro.' Di TISTAF bSE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAJ a Uf a _ + APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: TJL rJAN 2 31985 J APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 121 J Accepted BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. r=1 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: 2,4dAPPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: A) ) . 10,65 EJ Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: 07; Building lgsDesign Eng. Fire Parks EJ 'Police 0 Policy Dev. C21 Traffic Eng. Utilities ii sw--.........morimemmommor REVISED 1-31-84 Legal description of property (If more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). The South 329.85 feet of that portion of Government Lot 7 in Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington lying West of Puget Sound Traction, Light and Power right-of-way and Southeasterly of a line conveyed to the State of Washington by Warranty Deed recorded under King County Recording No. 7427163, EXCEPT the East 15 feet thereof for road and lane purposes. AFFIDAVIT 0-ikak.Q.ALJ being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner, [owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN T BEFORE ME THIS 07.5k 1 DAY OF 19 6P`' . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHI TON,RESIDING AT Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner) Agent for the Owner k 130 Lakeside, Suite F ddress) Q °t So ./ Address) Seattle, Washington 98122 City) State) (Zip) 206) 325-2553 Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 nF R ECF: I F- of/-d'S` 1 C LU:S9 —c?//—ogr0—City of Renton z 0 CITY,O ZIUTnni pgTED P ENVIRONMENTAL CNECKLI SEPie JAN 23 1985 Purpose of C iecklist: l!II_rDINGi 7 G T.The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C Cw, requires ,an-- governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observatior s or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmertal agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal. even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional informaticn that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1.Name of proposed project, if applicable: NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK 2. Name of applicant: LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS 3.A ddress and phone number of applicant and contact person: 130 Lakeside, Suite F Seattle, Washington 98122 206) 325-2553 Contact Person: Thomas Zander 4. Date checklist prepared: 1/22/85 5. Agency requesting checklist: Building & Zoning Dept. , City of Renton 6. Propose8 timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction to begin as soon as possible (March 1 , 1985) . ifillassiiiiilliMINIsekii_ f. _ -ae. 7.Do you have any pla 'or future additions, expansions, c irther activity related to or connected with Lnis proposal? if yes, explain. No, just tenant improvement work. 1 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Building, Utility and Occupancy Permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Develop 270,000 s.f. vacant lot into office/warehouse facility. Building to be 110,000 s.f. and designed for multiple tenants. Wall height to be 28' -0" above finish floor. General construction to be slab on-grade, tilt-up concrete walls and a flat built-up roof system. There is to be an aluminum and glass storefront system at office areas, dock high service doors at building front south side) , elevation, and on-grade service door at rear. Asphalt paving to be used for parking and maneuvering area with about 133 auto parking spaces. Landscaping to be at perimeter & interior locations all per City requirements. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section. township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. On West Valley Road north of S. 180th St. with Van Daal Distributors to the north and Howard Cooper Corp. to the south. Legal Description - The South 329.85 feet of that portion of Government Lot 7 in Section 25, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington lying West of Puget Sound Traction, Light and Power right-of-way and South- easterly of a line conveyed to the State of Washington by Warranty Deed recorded under King County Recording No. 7427163, EXCEPT the East 15 feet thereof for road and lane purposes. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? None c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Do not know. A soils investigation and report have been initiated but are not yet d. complete. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Do not know 2 - e. Describe the irpose, type, and approximate qu sties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grade the site with equal cut and fill to bring site to proper grades needed. Approximately 55,000 cubic ft. of import to bring building pad up to dock high elevation. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Temporary erosion control measures will be utilized to contain erosion completely on site. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 85% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Construction: Containment ditches, sedimentation ponds , hay bale dams to contain on site. During Use: City storm drain system and landscaping. 2.AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors. industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction: Normal equipment exhaust emissions and construction dust. Complete: Normal vehical exhaust emissions from car and truck traffic. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: No 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply 3 - 4) Will the pro 1 require surface water withdrav or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately qu.......ties if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water - See B. 1 .h. above. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No 4 - d. Proposed ml was to reduce or control surface, Rind, and runoff water impacts, if any: See 3.c. 1 . above. 4.Plar is a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All site will be stripped and new landscape added. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The site will be landscaped with plants native to the area. S.Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other maybe song birds Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other None Fish: bass. salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Do not know. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Do not know. S - d. Proposed m1 ires to preserve or enhance wildlif F any: Landscaping native to the area. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric - lighting, heating, ventilation Natural Gas - heating b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Standard insulation and energy use per the Washington State Energy Code. 7. Er vironmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1; Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire, police or medical use for a normal hazard type building. 21 Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise I) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 6 - 2) What types levals of noise would be created or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction will generate typical construction noise during normal working hours. Operation will generate noise from normal truck and auto noise from about 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant; Van Daal Distributors to the north Howard Cooper Corp. to the south b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not at present c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MP f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Manufacturing park multiple option g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 10-20 people may work at the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 7 - 1. Proposed rr ures to ensure the proposal is co itible with existing and projected 1i..... uses and plans, if any: Allowed in MP Zone 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 28'-0" from finish floor + 3' -0" for roof slope b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Exterior lighting will be non-glare type. Light from interior office may spill over into parking area. Office lighting during normal office hours. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 8 - 12. Rec reation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Do not know b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Do not know b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. West Valley Road - standard curb cuts b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Do not know c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Eliminate no parking stalls. Add 133 new parking stalls. ci. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe indicate whether public or private). No 9 - e. Will the pro use (or occur in the immediate nity of) water, rail, or air transporldLion? If so, generally describe. Indirectly as transportation of any goods f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 100-200 trips per day g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Fire portection, police and health care as emergency use only. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currentl available at the site: electricity, natural ga , ater, fuse service, elephone, anitary sewer septic system, of er. I b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electric, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone and sanitary/storm sewer as provided by local utility companies. C. SIGNATURE I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: THOMAS ZANDER 10 - 176 11-8-8 v 1 1 t... .1 1 i" f1 ...'(.\,_ 1 CITY OF RENTON D JAN 2 31985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. ppl yy , : 1 a I t •, • ttc!kik Pi...:, 21,) L , 1 r• • u A-tii..11. r.i A AliF . — - 4 ç N IUNu•.. j •J 1 a i, /- 10. C Ki•..•-,,sue I_t/y: i rP, 6 4 . 1' 13500 (p\ 0 y• , sw.,..e 1 1r , l4t 0' L 900 rl 1' i I` • I' y- Civ' 14 1 •... .- r'.1 a r s '1 tw' '+" \r• -t--`-"51,c it L-4 ril -1—'4— ...„ tElit , .;.:,..: , „" • 1 1 j.t`'" . 1,;..4-c•t-::1-...0.ex ik.•,... . \ I 77/...! ,...s., it-15A.. •••••A. le" 11114 ti 4. 1111PINIIIII41r&%T iirV,i . • { ' ,• 111/, 1. \-.) ',(,r :'4;/ 1S4' art 7.r- t 155J0 it 4, -r .t 11 .1., ti 'R•/ aramilirkt:. .....". .,,, r,-;., i 1 ceillirrAWII — ii . 5I - 4 . moietl, F.._ t" mo t ."-, ', II' Nk 1 i! ! i 1! 'lk 1 / 1. i(._ ! l• - ..1 I /12 1 I li \_ .._ I 1. r , E fir, 111,I CORPORATION City of Renton Permit Counter HAND DELIVERY Re: North Valley Business Park The owner of the above referenced property, North Valley Partnership, a Washington general partnership, hereby authorizes Lance Mueller & Associates to serve as agent for the owners in 01SECOND AVENUE SO. submission of any and all permits necessary on the above UITE200 referenced project. EATTLE,WA 98104 2.06)467-5544 Dated this 22nd day of January, 1985. North Valley Partnership By: eneral Partner J AN 4 3 1985 soca Mu GE & M CITY OrOr REN7ON V (i L"I L5 rJAN 2 31985 BUILDING/zo ,, ,r DEFT. vt 1 11 f-T\C L. 1 CITY OFRENTON Jt-ite-i-T-3 YA[A,5-r ,11 :2IN': -3- r--)/-\15.. M Tr') 'I-, 1 Vi 1) 1 r. ' 1JAN 2 31985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. y.. l a 1i! T c, i I z,l 6 n 6©h\` N - ; a~• 1,'e 7 iw-..' 5 t Y; I1 u i 7s l V KNIUNwu. S lla ' I s' YT+.$t yF r li 1300 . l,e, r, F 1, IlL® i 13500 `u 7... ,`• . J , r .. till-rilllii ~ r.ly, i .... 4 •"A t Y•• • L .r'.,fi- L. -•- - i-,i. M• !kali i 1 (. 7,... rr, . . r•71 f y1, +1 tti. tr - 7 yn.. C4 7 .. it ' rr: i•,iViliNE tini. D.r i {c, - i .. , F , i.3 Hari iC1J. . . .\ .. t"y.ef ..- y I rl •I • 1G' v 1 T•r- I i 1 11Irr I{f\ 1 . r i i I .- 1 SSJO, 14, R i /„'.s. . .:,T.7} i gi,.\111r ®' ` pn- Iiw.r.•.1 nn n w 1 It 1,.•.arlia 1 .§ 1 t. .11,4 ,,.. i tfr:%.,7 1111Mal r,mima 1 I . Va 1 881311k1WI ''': , 0 TIP/1M. 7 - t ..1.. F... frt.-4. . WPM lt; s ! 6 ,,,, I K E N T 1, .•'_ t 1 f 1: r :..Sixa.',N1b+rram.. 1.'E. TYi *!t i . le.: .4'.h, a.;:+ LANCE MUELLER a E--i OF nQOZW U777/AL ASSOCIATES/ARCHITE 130 Lakeside Suite F SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 DATE JOB NO. 206) 325-2553 ATTENTION RE: H ` Ui4TO ( / ; csm- fork i 1 1rmy> 1 l , WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached Under separate cover via the following items: Shop drawings Prints Plans Samples Specifications Copy of letter Change order COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION i 1/4,74{lAli 64(//fire4116 /at /Sit i m 6 re/ L.& 4.,.:Iik 67 (Ank,21 li Ii 17 c:.: 14 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval •Approved as submitted Resubmit copies for approval For your use Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution As requested Returned for corrections Return corrected prints For review and comment 0 1i iC //7// 1/ FOR BIDS DUE 19 7' PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS CITY OF REN T ON 1 [ 'M I [-I:j_ IF, ij W t: ) rJAN231985 BUIL DIN G/70Nju. OEpT COPY TO SIGNED: ,!. ,/C Y RODUCT 140-1 (ne JInc.,Goron,Masto1a71 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. fAz auu3111 31W O 9NIaN '