The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA85-022 (File 1)6fi w+ 'air it is . ., . 11 Is i° d 1m I s S.W. I6TH STREET M N 89.35'25"E-448.59' o N89°35'25°E-411.17' 1..1 ISO.L21 317.77' h 80' 8 0O I I 3 gio 6=90°02.42'n N• R=243.87'N 0= Z to N. a)o 6 N 1Q N89.35'33°E-261.13 LIN w 1 51 1 8 a3 O m 1- CDmI5019p S In 1.4rAG L.4,Aa ' a, r 49 10 o N 89°35'36"E-26482' 0 0 7 h 0 OQ 0 CC co m I'85'L5 r>lol.g2IJ0q°5525e.-S O.OD N8 N W W n CD D _ a Z 1 W w Q b ch Cr0 0 U-1 N O °- n Z 2 N W J N N Z J to S1 N a TA aKO m a W 1.54Ac 7.3C, tS tiN3 s O 0 0 u 80' 517.041 5I.I.5 I' 50' N 89•49 0rM-I 138.55- w S.W. 19TH STREET O 5Vcit) 2L-A'c-02.2.-eE BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TI\ `/%' / 611/t*6:1Zd MICROFILMED T 4111 a AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION AudreyDeJoie g 70 ao > >o. zbeingfirstdulyswornonoathstatesthat5z.2 o 0 3 = m o he/she is the Chief Clerk of the et m= ' 5 w p s m g m-Zi= a sA0m mWIzo cr VALLEY NEWSPAPERS 3 -.m ..7. c mm 13 o w FDm w 3”.. 32 D, Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News 4 N w o g o ?g m ==m o p R0o3 » nDailynewspaperspublishedsix (6)times a week.That said newspapers o d c 8 g,.g o r are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six g; a .O w z z zm months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published v c 70 3 ?2,2•Z 3)0 in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King 0'4 m m County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for x o m g S »m— wg 015A .King County. a The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News I 's o wale—( Tgl m •4$ o c Journal , Daily Record Chronicle , Daily Globe News , (and o •A g ' c,a 3 4 1 not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its y 5 w a psubscribersduringthebelowstatedperiod. The annexed notice a d. o ; w 3 ° s< Notice of Public Rearing was published0,00ziA 0 on May 3, 1985 R9849 o z p $ u a r -. 0 w . ft sit SiA The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $?0-79 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of May 19 85 . 121 Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN M87 Rwlwd 10/84 ge49 TO: DATE% %/SIRs FROM: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SUBJECT: 11velin ,cop-leg of Shrrt Plat No. 022-85 - r--1,4,1gtr1- Please furnish the following to the City Clerk's Office: Certification of Posting Legal Description Certification of Valid Petition Map Deed Pro Rata Share of Costs Easement Restrictive Covenants THANK YOU! Requested by: TO: DATES FROM: C: TY CLERK'S OFFICE SUBJECT: Short Plat hio. 022-35 -- Val:: fir adustri Please furnish the following to the City Clerk's Office: Certification of Posting Legal Description Certification of Valid Petition Map Deed Pro Rata Share of Costs Easement Restrictive Covenants X Make 4 blueline copies And return copiE_ mylar for your files. THANK YOU! Requested by: Maxine Motor OF ReI/ ty2.THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 094,4.0 SEP1c40 MEMORANDUM July 12, 1985 TO: Terri FROM: Gayle Nelson, City Clerk's Office RE: Mylar for Short Plat (SH PL 022-85) Valley Office Park Subdivision II Please send the original to University Reprographics and they in turn will bill us. Please return the original to this office. Thank you. OF R 4 o THE CITY OF RENTON U `• MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 O BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9q FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235 -2593 0- at SEFt(cM P June 13, 1985 Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator City of RE nton 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, Wa. 98055 RE: Recuest for Reconsideration - Valley Office Short Plat #022-85 Roger: I have reviewed your request for reconsideration in the above entitled matter and my response follows. I find the request to defer questions about access from Proposed Lots 1 and 2 until the site plan sl.age a little confusing. The Renton Subdivision Code and State law both provide that it is exactly this stage, with the subdivision of property, that an account must be taken of p:-oviding for public ways. I also find it peculiar that staff has taken a contrary position on the appropriate time to impose access limitations on the separate Jack Stewart Short Plat application, wherein staff recommends at the short plat stage that access limitations not only be considered, but imposed. Your letter clearly quotes the Comprehensive Plan: ThE number of access points on individual sites should be minimized." Along arterial routes, direct access to individual sites should occur only when alternative access via secondary streets is unavailable." Maintain arterial streets for the primary purpose of traffic movement, access frorr abutting property should be minimized." All city streets should be fully improved with the minimum number of curb cuts." I would not consider the decision a strict interpretation of those provisions, but a simple conclusion that the Comprehensive Plan, when coupled with the subdivision provisions, means that access should be via a secondary street if possible. The inclusion of access limitations on the face of a plat map is clearly favored over the more hidden declarations usually contained in concurrent agreements. Anyone dealing with a lot which has its restrictions clearly delineated on the plat map would not be misled a 3 to access restrictions, or for that matter, any other condition clearly shown on the plat map. Nor would City staff have to delve deeply into the history of the site if the maps contained such restrictions on their face. At the same time the total preclusion of access to Lind Avenue at this time may be premature. But this office still concludes that the subdivision stage provides the City with the best opportunity to provide safe and efficient access to public streets. Therefore, the condition will be modified to require that the plat map indicate that access to the Proposed Lots 1 and 2 may be limited to gated secondary access, if the City in its sole discretion determines that traffic safety or efficiency would be improved by such a limitatioi. If this of rice can be of any further assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: Mayor Shinpoch Cty Attorney Mike Parness William Fetterley Cty Clerk II BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR rn00aim. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 0 4TD SEPSE O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: June 5, 1985 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrato SUBJECT: Valley Office and Industrial Park, Inc., ShortPatl022-85 Reconsideration Request The Hearing Examiner in Conclusion No. 5 states that the Comprehensive Plan indicates that arterial streets should be limited access streets and therefore access to Lind Avenue from proposed Lots #1 and #2 should be precluded especially since both of these lots have frontage upon the public right-of-way. The Building and Zoning Department respectifully requests that the Hearing Examiner reconsider the condition as delineated under point No. 4 as stated in his decision for the following reasons: 1. The Hearing Examiner in imposing this condition apparently took into account two policies as stated on page 40 of the Comprehensive Plan Compendium of the Transportation Element for the Valley Plan. the number of access points on individual sites should be minimized" along arterial routes, direct access to individual sites should occur only when alternative access via secondary streets is unavailable." Analysis: The Hearing Examiner took a strick interpretation without a basis in fact demonstrated by a traffic analysis showing what precluding access onto Lind Avenue would do to the intersections of S.W. 16th Street and Lind Avenue S.W., and S.W. 19th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. A specific traffic analysis can only accompany a specific site plan to precisely address the reverse impact that limiting access onto Lind Avenue would create upon those intersections. The site plan approval process allows the Hearing Examiner to consider specific access in the review process and the Building and Zoning Department believes that it is untimely to limit access at the subdivision stage. Fred J. Kaufman June 6, 1985 Page 2 2.The decision of the Examiner is not clearly supported by the city-wide streets objective as delineated on page 20 of the Comprehensive Plan Compendium. It state3 that "streets should be well designed, constructed, and maintained." Specific policies point to the fact that "the design, scale and location of the street should be appropriate to the area" and they should "maintain arterial streets for the primary purpose of traffic movement, access from abutting property should be minimized." "All city streets should be fully improved with the minimum number of cl.rb cuts." Analysis: Even though these general policies are more clearly defined by the policies elaborated on page 40 of the Compendium document, the key must be flexibility in obtaining the best and most efficient design to reduce traffic impacts. The Building and Zoning Department believes that access should be minimized, but a strict access limitation increases the congestion because it increases the number of turning movements. Entry onto the site will now involve an additional turning movement across a major arterial. The backup from traffic turning left eastbound on S.W. 16th Street to enter the site would eventually back traffic across the Lind Avenue overpass into the Grady Way traffic corridor. We believe that a specific analysis of this should be conducted prior to the imposition of a condition. The Building and Zoning Department would recommend to the Hearing Examiner that the applicant be required in the site plan approval process to show two alternatives to the site. One with a joint access of both parcels #1 and #2 onto Lind Avenue S.W., and one with no access onto Lind Avenue S.W. This would provide the opportunity to evaluate the best alternative in the public hearing process. Thank yoi. very much for the opportunity to submit our concerns regarding the proposed short plat of Valley Office & Industrial Plat. RECEIVED UN 05 1985 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER O OF J THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 a _. > ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9A FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235 -2593 c,09it6-D SEPTE° Q June 7, 198` William S. F etterley, AIA The Austin Company 800 Southwest 16th Street Renton, Wa. 98055 Re: Valle/ Office & Industrial Park Short Plat 022-85 Request for Reconsideration Dear Mr. Fetterly: This letter is to confirm our various conversations regarding your attempt to request reconsiderat ion in the above entitled matter. Your submiEsions were not presented to this office in a timely fashion. This office is open to the public until 5:00 P.M., during working days. You were apparently informed of this by both Ron Nelson, Building Director, and Carolynne Lombard, a secretary on this floor, prior to submitting your materials. Frankly, you bear the responsibility for reviewing the Examiner's Report and objecting in a timely fashion. While this office attempts to process materials in a fair manner, with respect to rules of procedure, we must provide a consistant standard. This office is not permitted to consider any request which does not reach it in a timely fashion, and the rules cannot be changed fog, any individual request. Therefore, the materials and your request for reconsiderat ion will not be considered by this office. This office has received a request for reconsideration by the Building and Zoning Department and will process that request in due course. If this office can be of any further assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, FRED J. KFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: Maycr Shinpoch L. Warren, Attorney Building & Zoning Director City 2lerk a THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH ST. RENTON. WA 98055 COMPANY PHONE 206/226-8800 TELEX 910.423.0882 DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS 223-01 AU-ST-IC-T377N3 June 27 , 1985 Fred J. Kaufman Land Use Hearing Examiner City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Valley Office & Industrial Park Short Plat, 022-85 Site Plan Approval , SA-038-85 W.O. 85-5350 Dear Mr . Kaufman: In an effort to resolve the above noted Short Plat as quickly as possible, I wish to suggest the following language appear on the face of the Short Plat Mylar : PERPETUAL AGREEMENT The design of items addressed below as Perpetual Agreements will be mutually determined by the property owners and by the zoning review processes which are current at the time of development . Site Amenity 2. 6% of the land area of Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 shall be provided as a contiguous, cooperatively designed and maintained amenity area. Cooperative Access The initial development shall determine patterns for on-site circulation of traffic and landscape placement. Subsequent development shall prescribe to those patterns to maintain a concordant appearance and operation. O c Fred J . Kaufman June 27 , 1985 Page 2 It is my hope that this wording in combination with the existing Site Plan Approval process will insure our mutual desire to create the atmosphere represented in the Master Plan presented to you on Tuesday, June 25, 1985 . The Short Plat documentation will be circulated to you before your opinion is due to be released on the Site Plan Approval. Timely processing of both of these actions is critical to the progress of the B.C.S. Office Facility Project. Any effort your office may be able to convey to expedite approval will be greatly appreciated . As always, should any questions arise, please don' t hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, THE USTIN COMPANY Z' Wm. Stewart Fetterley, AI Project Architect WSF :ddl cc : P. S. Chiado RECEIVED JUN 28 1985 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER OF 16 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT U 4 RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 eO9gtDSEF1E BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYCR MEMORANDUM DATE: June 5, 1985 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Valley Office and Industrial Park, Inc., Short atlatl022-85 Reconsideration Request The Hearing Examiner in Conclusion No. 5 states that the Comprehensive Plan indicates that arterial streets should be limited access streets and therefore access to Lind Avenue from proposed Lots #1 and #2 should be precluded especially since both of these lots have frontage upon the public right-of-way. The Building and Zoning Department respectifully requests that the Hearing Examiner reconsider the condition as delineated under point No. 4 as stated in his decision for the following reasons: 1.The Hearing Examiner in imposing this condition apparently took into account two policies as stated on page 40 of the Comprehensive Plan Compendium of the Transportation Element for the Valley Plan. the number of access points on individual sites should be minimized" along arterial routes, direct access to individual sites should occur only when alternative access via secondary streets is unavailable." Analysis: The Hearing Examiner took a strick interpretation without a basis in fact demonstrated by a traffic analysis showing what precluding access onto Lind Avenue would do to the intersections of S.W. 16th Street and Lind Avenue S.W., and S.W. 19th Street and Lind Avenue S.W. A specific traffic analysis can only accompany a specific site plan to precisely address the reverse impact that li niting access onto Lind Avenue would create upon those intersections. The site plan approval process allows the Hearing Examiner to consider specific access in the review process and the Building and Zoning Department believes that it is untimely to limit access at the subdivision stage. 411P. Fre&J. Kaufman June 6, 1585 Page 2 2.The decision of the Examiner is not clearly supported by the city-wide streets objective as delineated on page 20 of the Comprehensive Plan Compendium. It states that "streets should be well designed, constructed, and maintained." Specific policies point to the fact that "the design, scale and location of the street should be appropriate to the area" and they should "maintain arterial streets for the primary purpose of traffic movement, access from abutting property should be minimized." "All city streets should be fully improved with the minimum number of curb cuts." Analysis: Even though these general policies are more clearly defined by the policies elaborated on page 40 of the Compendium document, the key must be flexibility in obtaining the best and most efficient design to reduce traffic impacts. The Building and Zoning Department believes that access should be minimized, but a strict access limitation increases the congestion because it increases the number of turning movements. Entry onto the site will now involve an additional turning movement across a major arterial. The backup from traffic turning left eastbound on S.W. 16th Street to enter the site would eventually back traffic across the Lind Avenue overpass into the Grady Way traffic corridor. We believe that a specific analysis of this should be conducted prior to the imposition of a condition. The Building and Zoning Department would recommend to the Hearing Examiner that the applicant be required in the site plan approval process to show two alternatives to the site. One with a joint access of both parcels #1 and #2 onto Lind Avenue S.W., and one with no access onto Lind Avenue S.W. This would provide the opportunity to evaluate the best alternative in the public hearing process. Thank you very much for the opportunity to submit our concerns regarding the proposed short plat of Valley Office & Industrial Plat. RECEIVED JUN 05 1985 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER a THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 COM PANY TELEPHONE: 206/226-8800 TELEX. 910.423.0882 DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS RECEIVEDJune5 , 1985 JUN 06 1985 Mr . Fred J . Kaufman CITY OF RENTON Hearing Examiner HEARING EXAMINER The City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , Washingotn 98055 Re : Valley Office & Industrial Park Short Plat 022-85 Dear Mr . Kaufman : I wish to take this opportunity to request your reconsideration of three of the four conditions of your decision conerning the above noted Short Plat . As I stated during the hearings , we had anticipated , partially on the basis of a previous short plat proposal , the right of way dedication along Southwest 16th Street . This truly does " serve the public . . . " , but the three other conditions appear to derive no particular good . Indeed , they may be detrimental to the safe development of the subject lots . First of all , the need for increased width of the East Valley Frontage Road . The present 70 foot right of way could be configured to accommodate as much use as the requested 80 foot right of way if you consider the fact that only the west frontage is available for development . The east side abuts the right of way for S .R . 167 , the East Valley Freeway . This situation virtually eliminates the need for traffic revision to service the east frontage . If "the design , scale and location of streets should be appropriate to the area" , as stated in the current Comprehensive Plan , is a policy for the development of the City , I do not believe that the expansion of East Valley serves a productive purpose . The third and fourth conditions of your decision are linked because they both address the use of Lind Avenue . I regret that I must admit to some confusion as to just what is policy and how interpretation of that policy is realized in the current and past Mr . Fred J . Kaufman June 5 , 1985 Page Two development activity . It does not appear that the intent of City policy has changed over the past eight years , yet these conditions reflect considerable change . The previous Green River Valley Plan , Ordinance Number 3037 , adopted June 1976 , which was an "Area-Specific Policy" element of the previous Comprehensive Plan does not appear to be in conflict with the current Comprehensive Plan . ( This was the guideline for the majority of development along Lind Avenue and , indeed , the construction of Lind Avenue itself . ) This document indicates as an objective of the Valley Plan that "access should be limited to controlled ingress and egress points to avoid conflicts and congestion" . The physical realization of this objective has not restricted any development along the entire length of Lind Avenue , within Renton , to emergency crash gates or access to a side street as condition Number 4 of your decision does . Indeed , virtually every project with frontage along Lind has ample direct access to develop logical internal circulation . It has been explained to me that the classifications of Lind Avenue as an " Industrial arterial " requires wider turning radi and other elements to accommodate heavy truck usage , yet now when the emphasis of the Comprehensive Plan is revised to " office use" , implying a defferent type of traffic a greater right of way is required . . . ? It is our understanding that the existing right of way width cold be utilized to accommodate a central turn lane as well as the existing two lanes of traffic in each direction with more thEn ample room for sidewalks and landscaping . If the additional width of right of way is necesary to provide turning lanes , why then is the ability to turn into the site restricted along Lind Avenue? Without driveways , what purpose wi ' l turning lanes serve? JEII1 Mr . Fred J . Kaufman June 5 , 1985 Page Three The City Traffic and Planning personnel have indicated that measures are being taken to develop another north-south arterial " which should reduce the existing and future need for use of Lind Avenue ; I refer to the Oaksdale Parkway . If this is the plan , then why should additional property be dedicated to Lind Avenue? The City ' s staff report refers to the "City ' s 6-Year Street Program" , and yet that document makes no reference to the need to expand Lind Avenue or a move for acquisition of additional right of way . The confusion that I believe is evident in the conflict within City policy is countered by a very clear understanding of what these three conditions would do to the orderly development of the subject site . For example , if Lot Number "One" were fully developed for office use , as is currently being planned , approximately 700 vehicles could be parked on the site , ( with the development of an office building ) . The thought of the traffic impact to Southwest 16th Street , and the related intersection at Lind Avenue and Southwest 16th , does not conjure images of any of the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan towards an "efficient" , orderly" , or " safe" Transportation System . The successful design of the internal circulation and , therefore , the subject properties ' potential for development is highly dependent upon greater access and egress than that which can be provided from Southwest 16th Street . I , therefore , believe that the overriding concerns in rec:onsideration of these three conditions should not hinge on examination of subordinate and somewhat self-conflicting statements of policy , but rather on the stated goals " to promote a safe , efficient and balanced Multi -Model Transportation System" . Mr . Fred J . Kaufman June 5 , 1985 Page Four I respectfully request that conditions two , three and four be dropped from your decision . As additional support , I include a copy of the traffic study which has been prepared in conjunction with the development of Lot No . 1 , and a letter from Wm. E . Popp , the engineer who prepared this study . Very truly ours , Wm . Stewart Fetterley , AIA RECEIV ED Project Architect WSF :msr UN " 1985 cc : P . S . Chiado CITY RQG k MNEOMheft. • r a•THE AUSTIN 800 SOUTHWEST 16TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 COM PANY TELEPHONE: 206/226-8800 TELEX 910.423.0882 DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • BUILDERS June 5 , 1985 Mr . Fred J . Kaufman Hearing Examiner The City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , Washingotn 98055 Re : Valley Office & Industrial Park Short Plat 022-85 Dear Mr . Kaufman : I wish to take this opportunity to request your reconsideration of three of the four conditions of your decision conerning the above noted Short Plat . As I stated during the hearings , we had anticipated , partially on the basis of a previous short plat proposal , the right of way dedication along 16th Avenue . This truly does " serve the public . . . " , but the three other conditions appear to derive no particular good . Indeed , they may be detrimental to the safe development of the site . First of all , the need for increased width of East Valley Frontage Road . The present 70 foot right of way could be configured to accommodate as much use as the requested 80 foot right of way when the fact that only the west frontage is available for development , the east side abuts the right of way for S .R . 167 , the East Valley Freeway . This situation virtually eliminates the need for traffic revision to service the east frontage . If "the design , scale and location of streets should be appropriate to the area" , as stated in the current Comprehensive Plan , is a policy for the development of the City , I do not believe that the expansion of East Valley serves a productive purpose . The third and fourth conditions of your decision are linked because they both address the use of Lind Avenue . I regret that I must admit to some confusion as to just what is policy and how interpretation of that policy is realized in the current and past development activity when the wording of policy appears not to have changed . r Mr . Fred J . Kaufman June 5 , 1985 PagE Two The previous Green River Valley Plan , Ordinance Number 3037 , adopted June 1976 , which was an "Area-Specific Policy" element of the previous Comprehensive Plan does not appear to be in conflict wit!i the current Comprehensive Plan . ( This was the guideline for the majority of development along Lind Avenue and , indeed , the construction of Lind Avenue proper . ) This document indicates as an objective of the Valley Plan that " access should be limited to controlled ingress and egress points to avoid conflicts and congestion" . The physical realization of this objective has not restricted any development along the entire length of Lind Avenue , within Renton , to emergency crash gates or access to a side street . Indeed , virtually every project with frontage along Lind has ample direct access to Lind to develop logical internal circulation . It has been explained to me that the classifications of Lind Avenue as an " Industrial arterial " requires wider turning radi and other items to accommodate heavy truck usage , yet now when the emphasis of the Comprehensive Plan is revised to " office use" , implying a defferent type of traffic a greater right of way is required . . .? It is our understanding that the existing right of way width coild be utilized to accommodate turn lanes as well as the two lanes of traffic in each direction with more than ample room for siiewalks and landscaping . If the additional width of right of way is necesary to provide turning lanes , why then is the ability to turn into the site restricted along Lind Avenue? The City Traffic and Planning personnel have indicated that measures are being taken to develop another north-south arterial " which should reduce the existing and future need for use of Lind Avenue ; I refer to Oaksdale . If this is the plan , then why should additional property be dedicated to Lind Avenue? Q Mr . Fred J . Kaufman June 5 , 1985 Page Three The City ' s staff report refers to the "City' s 6-Year Street Program" , and yet that document makes no reference to the need to expand Lind Avenue or a move for acquisition of additional right of way . The confusion that I believe is evident in the conflict within City policy is countered by a very clear understanding of what these three conditions would do to the orderly development of the subject site . For example , if Lot Number "One" were fully developed for office use , as is currently being planned , approximately 700 vehicles could be parked on the site , (with the development of an office building) . The though of the traffic impact to Southwest 16th Street , and the related intersection at Lind Avenue and Southwest 16th , does not conjure images of any of the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan towards an "efficient" , orderly" , or " safe" Transportation System . The successful design of the internal circulation and , therefore , the project sites potential for development is highly dependent upon additional access and egress than that which could be provided from Southwest 16th Street . I , therefore , believe that the overriding concerns in reconsideration of these three conditions should not hinge on examination of subordinate and somewhat self-conflicting statements of policy , but rather on the stated goals "to promote a safe , efficient and balanced Multi -Model Transportation System" . I respectfully request that conditions two , three and four be dropped from your decision . As additional support , I include a copy of the traffic study which has been prepared in conjunction with the development of Lot No . 1 , and a letter from Wm . E . Popp , the engineer who prepared this study . Very ruly ou s , RECEIVED Wm . Stewart Fet erley , A Project Architect JUN 06 1985 wsF :ms r CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER cc : P . S . Unlado AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 22nd day of May 1985, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 7L, . day of rnI -( 1985. QE /4 Notary Public wand for the State of Washington, residing at gym, therein. Application, Petition, or Case #1: SP-022-85 - VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) 0873 May 22, 1985 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. FILE NO. Short Plat 022-85 LOCATION: Between Lind Avenue S.W. and East Valley Road and between S.W. 16th Street and S.W. 19th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Short Plat approval to subdivide approximately 28.24 acres of property into four (4) industrial lots. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT:received by the Examiner on May 7, 1985. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on May 14, 1985, at 9:05 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and other documents pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Short Plat Map dated April 1, 1985. The hearing opened with a review of the staff report by Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. He noted the underlying zoning on the property is Light and Heavy Industrial with one portion of the site, proposed lot #4 zoned L-1. This proposal meets with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. There has been extensive development in this area over the last five years with the addition of L.I.D.'s and the availability of major water and sewer services. Three lots will be approximately the same size, with Lot #4 being the smallest at 6.1 acres in size. In 1963 the northeast portion of Lot #4 was rezoned and restrictive covenants were required limiting setbacks. Those covenants will be imposed some time in the future during the site plan approval phase which will be required on the four lots involved in this proposal. Mr. Blaylock went on to review the comments from various city departments noting the Engineering departments have pointed out the need for improvements such as sidewalks, lighting and the necessity for easements along the property lines so sewer service and utility service can be extended into the inner portion of the sites. Mr. Blaylock continued with discussion of an adjustment of existing right-of-way for S.W. 16th Street so it will match the alignment for East Valley Road. The width of Lind Avenue was discussed and it was stated that a portion of Lind Avenue should be dedicated for future street extensions and expansions. The easement would be approximately 20 ft. The proposal does not comply with the subdivision ordinance requirement of 90 foot minimum arterial right-of-way widths for streets on an industrial arterial. Brief discussion was held as to the width of East Valley Road, which is a collector street, and it was determined to have a 70 ft. right-of-way instead of the 80 ft. normally required. This figure was obtained from the as-built plans for LID 314. It was suggested that a 5 ft. dedication be made along the eastern property line for widening of East Valley Road. VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. SHORT PLAT 2022-85 May 22, 1985 Page 2 Continuing, Mr. Blaylock stated it was staff's recommendation that this proposal be approved subject to the dedication of a 10 ft. right-of-way along the east side of Lind Avenue S.W. and the dedication along the right-of-way for S.W. 16th Street. The Examiner questioned the dedication along Lind Avenue, and Mr. Blaylock responded stating Lind Avenue was constructed with the preconception that the area would be a manufacturing park area and not office park as designated in the Comprehensive Plan. Lind is the primary street and was designed to create a three lane section (one travel lane in each direction and a turning lane), which should be sufficient to meet the intent and primary focus of the complete project. The Lind Avenue bridge will be widened to 4 lanes. To allow access onto the bridge it was felt it would be advisable to have the right-of-way on Lind Avenue. He also pointed out that there is an excess of 90 ft. available for right-of-way for the portion of Lind Avenue between 16th Street and Grady Way. The Examiner called for testimony from the applicant or their representative. Responding was: William Fetterley Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, Wa. 98055 Mr. Fetterley stated he agreed with the staff report as presented. The only exception he held was in the area of increased right-of-ways, primarily along Lind Avenue. He said their research indicated that a secondary arterial could be met with the widths as proposed. He felt the adjustments along S.W. 16th were sensible and were anticipated in their development plans. The adjustments along East Valley frontage road have not been addressed, and he stated he would hope that the cost of the right-of-way increase would be a 5/5 split so one party would not have to bear the burden of the complete cost. Mr. Fetterley had no further comments. The Hearing Examiner called for further testimony in support of, or opposition to the application. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing was closed at 9:35 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS 1.The applicant, Valley Office and Industrial Park, Inc., has requested approval of a 4 lot short plat of approximately 28.24 acres. 2.The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5.There was no opposition to the subject proposal from any member of the public. 6. The subject site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 16th Street. The site is actually the entire block between Lind and the East Valley Road and between S.W. 16th and S.W. 19th Street, except for a small parcel located along East Valley. 7. The relatively level site is undeveloped and bounded on 4 sides by public streets. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option Office uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. SHORT PLAT 3022-85 May 22, 1985 Page 3 9. The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1745 adopted in April, 1959, as amended by Ordinances 1764 and 1928, adopted in May, 1959 and December, 1961, respectively. 10. The site lies within two zoning districts, the L-1 (Light Industry) district located at the extreme northeast corner of the subject site, and the H-1 (Heavy Industry) district covering the majority of the site. 11. The proposed subdivision would result in four lots with the following areas: Lots 1, 2 and 3 would each contain approximately 7.3 acres, while Lot 4 would contain approximately 6.1 acres. These figures represent the applicant's proposal. 12. Staff indicated that dedication of property for street right-of-way will be required along Lind Avenue S.W. and along S.W. 16th Street. (Section 9-1108(7)(H)). To provide the required width, 10 feet would be required along Lind; 15 to 20 feet along 16th. Similar application of the provision requires a dedication along East Valley Road. 13. Staff indicated East Valley has two travel lanes and a center turning lane which should provide for traffic demands. 14. The City recently constructed a new street system, and installed water and sewer lines as part of an LID series in the area surrounding the subject site. 15. The smaller parcel along East Valley which is surrounded by the subject site on three sides, has submitted plans for preliminary site development. Development on other parcels has occurred within the last few years both north of 16th and along both sides of Lind Avenue. CONCLUSIONS 1.The proposed short plat appears to serve the public use and interest and should be approved. 2. The division of the subject site into four lots will enable tenants with varying needs to find suitably sized parcels. Each of the parcels will have excellent access to the transportation corridor surrounding the subject site. 3.The subdivision must meet the requirements which call for those who divide land to provide for public ways. The applicant will have to dedicate property along three frontages to assure that the minimum standards of the subdivision code have been met. The most obvious need is along S.W. 16th Street where a projection of the subject site along the central portion of its northern property line intrudes into the existing alignment. In order to straighten the alignment the applicant will have to dedicate approximately 20 feet to be more precisely determined by the Public Works Department. 4. Similarly, dedications which go toward upgrading Lind and East Valley are required. The Subdivision Ordinance specifies a 90 foot right-of-way for Lind, an arterial, and 80 feet for East Valley. The applicant should therefore, dedicate 5 feet along each frontage to provide one half of the additional width required under the standards. No waiver was requested and the standards should be equally applied to all rights-of-way, not just those identified by staff. 5. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that arterial streets should be limited access streets and, therefore, access to Lind from proposed Lots 1 and 2 should be precluded, especially since both of these lots have frontage along the public right-of-way. This provision should be shown on the face of the plat. Gated emergency secondary access, if it cannot be accommodated along the alternate frontages of those properties may be permitted along Lind Ave S.W. DECISION The Short Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The dedication of between 15 and 20 feet along the northern property line for the widening of S.W. 16th Street, subject to the approval of the Public Works Department. VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. SHORT PLAT 4022-85 May 22, 1985 Page 4 2. The dedication of five feet along the east property line for the widening of East Valley Road. 3. The dedication of five feet along the west property line for the widening of Lind Avenue S.W. 4. The face of the plat shall indicate that only gated emergency access may be permitted from Lots 1 and 2 to Lind Avenue S.W., and then only if secondary access cannot be accommodated along the alternate street frontage. ORDERED THIS 22nd day of May, 1985. Ko FRED J. KA MAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of May, 1985 to the parties of record: William Fetterley Austin Company 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, Wa. 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of May, 1985 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Jim Matthew, Fire Marshall Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before June 5, 1985. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. 1 s w S.W. I6TH STREET M N NY 35'25"E-444.59. p Nsr33'25"E-411.1T 1 15O.-"LI 311.17' s0' h ID 11: L."...".......):: r• n GiN Rrol t r10Ns9•33' 3uin1 1- nOI W111 O M °i1 T di n N 1 9.¢=L1G 6.¢sA6 t - 49 110 1 a N s9'35.3fi E-264 s2' 0 7 0 n OQ O CC N e 1JOq'55'25'e. -S(,O.00I NB°l'Sg 2.5.-5(.1.121 ey W W n t7 D 1-2 I NO 2WWaO N 1 IA- 0 r W)- J N J J J it z J J1 I-tA 3 a WI m a a r 7.5n n s 1.7:Ac• i s 0 0 7 s0. 57 7.041 51.1.51' 5' N er49"Ori-1134.5T S.W. 19TH STREET 10 B-1 \ r%, n I 1 e... l e L- 1 v ' 9 1 1 / G F 1 n i I_ 1 - H"'1 444 j i l I 1 iT'i :nM' I ia!i :j gip i R, I 1TT u ' ' 1 00 6 '—' ' I II 1 i(Vm Ili 1,,. I' s. N. r ;••• I•; - L.R-44;5 j qifl InI11011;HT I 1 'i ir— e„, , H.. .. 1 u i. ow_ i -,,,,/ ii 7,....;_,R. •• e., ...: ,...... li !moo 11: \ „ I ... ,,,.•,•,•,.i.i...1,;:,,, ,i,,,, lit • ,.-- . ell Ili iiik. :7. . st ..,.;_".. i......, s,./ , , , i! ilk 0\ ., .., . -_-_--..,,,-,• . .4R—G. C- - `. .,,,r__= i ' a.. a-1 r-,., • R- '1 i J.E E= q<: G41 R• r 4 r I . _. a, — --r II \ u r'-t°' VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. SHORT PLAT-022-85 APPLICANT VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC TOTAL AREA - 28.24 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS LIND AVE S.W. , EAST VALLEY ROAD, S.W. 16TH ST. AND S.W. 19TH ST. EXISTING ZONING H-1, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AND L-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE FOUR (4) LOT SHORT PLAT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION -OFFICE COMMENTS 1518Z CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MAY 14, 1985 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in w'iich they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing E):aminer. VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK SHORT PLAT Application for short plat approval to subdivide approximately 28.24 acres of industrial zoned property into four (4) lots, file Short Plat-022-85; property located between Lind Avenue S.W. and East Valley Road and between S.W. 16th Street and S.W. 19th Street. SOJND STEEL Application for special permit to allow fill and grading on a 0.72 acre site with approximately 4,200 cubic yards of material, file SP-025-85; located on the west side of East Valley Road at the 1600 block. 1111.1534Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MAY 14, 1985 APPLICANT: VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. FILE NUMBER: SHORT PLAT-022-85 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Application for short plat approval to subdivide approximately 28.24 acres of ndustrial zoned property into four (4) lots. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Valley Office & Industrial Park 2. Applicant: Valley Office & Industrial Park 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached)Located between Lind Avenue S.W. and East Valley Road and between S.W. 16th Street and S.W. 19th Street. 4. Existing Zoning: L-1, Light Industrial, H-1, Heavy Industrial. 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1, General Use; R-1, Residential-Single Family; L-1, Light Industrial; H--1, Heavy Industrial; and M-P, Manufacturing Park. 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option-Office. 7. Size of Property: 28.24 acres. 8. Access:Lind Avenue S.W., East Valley Road, S.W. 16th Street, and S.W. 19th Street. 9. Land Use: Undeveloped. 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Commercial, Industrial East: I-405, Residential South: Industrial/Commercial West: Industrial/Longacres Racetrack C.HI STORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 1745 April 4, 1959 Cc rrected 1764 May 19, 1959 Ccrrected 1928 Dec. 12, 1961 Rezone (G-1 to H-1) R-72-62 1955 May 14, 1962 Rezone (G to L-1) 1826 April 26, 1960 Rez me (G to L-1) R-119-63 2039 May 13, 1963 Special Permit SP-320-79 April 24, 1979 Fill & Grade) PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC., SHORT PLAT 022-85 PAGE 2 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1.Utilities: a. Water: There is a 16-inch water line along Lind Avenue S.W. and along S.W. 19th Street and a 12-inch water line located along East Valley Road adjacent to the subject property. b. Sewer: An 8-inch sanitary sewer line is located along Lind Avenue S.W., along S.W. 19th Street adjacent to the subject property and along S.W. 16th Street. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water drains into the East Valley wetlands system. 2.Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3.Transit: Metro Transit Route No. 199 operates along Lind Avenue S.W. Metro Transit Routes No. 157 and No. 167 operate along East Valley Road and S.W. 16th Street. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Not applicable. b. Middle Schools: Not applicable. c. High Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-712, Light Industrial (L-1). 2. Section 4-713, Heavy Industrial (H-1). 3. Section 4-744(F)(2), Landscape Requirements - Green River Valley. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Industrial Goal and Policies, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1985, pp. 18-19. 2. Green River Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1985, pp. 31-50. 3. Environmental Goal; Wildlife Objective (D), Vegetation Objective (E), Surface Drainage Objective (G), and Marshes, Bogs and Swamps Objective; City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1985, pp. 9-10. 4. Section 9-1105, Plat Requirements for Short Subdivisions. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1.The applicant, Valley Office and Industrial Park, Inc., is requesting a short plat of 28.24 acres into four industrial lots. The property is bounded on the north by S.W. 16th Street, on the south by S.W. 19th Street, on the east by East Valley Road, and on the west by Lind Avenue S.W. Lot No. 1 is anticipated to be approximately twice the size as lot Nos. 2 and 3, approximately three times the size as lot No. 4. 2.1 he proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park - Multiple Option and with the underlying zoning of H-1, Heavy Industrial, and L-1, Light Industrial. The majority of the site is zoned H-1, Heavy Industrial, with the northeastern portion of proposed lot No. 4 being designated as Light Industrial. In 1963, the northeast portion of the site was rezoned to L-1, Light Industrial R-119-63) with restrictive covenants that limited building setbacks. These will limit future development. 3.The proposal is exempt from the Environmental Policy Act of 1971 and therefore the Environmental Review Committee did not consider the actual short subdivision of the proposed site. Subsequent development will require site plan approval and will be required to go through an environmental disclosure at that point. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC., SHORT PLAT 022-85 PAGE 3 4. Various City departments have commented. The Police, Parks, F ire, and Policy Development Departments have all recommended approval without conditions. At the same time the Traffic Engineering, Engineering, and Utilities Engineering divisions points to specific code requirements and technical improvements that will have to accompany the actual construction of the short plat. Their primary concern is that utility easements be required along the property lines for sanitary sewer and utilities extensions. In addition, there will be approximately $155,000 in late corners' fees and system development charges for both water and sewer applicable at the time of construction. The Building Division pointed out that there should be some adjustment of existing right-of-way for S.W. 16th Street to match the alignment for East Valley Road. ISSUE: 5. Why does not the proposal comply with the subdivision requirement for width of streets on industrial arterials? The proposal, as present, does not comply with the 90 foot minimum arterial width as required in the Subdivision Code under Section 9-I108(7)(H). Lind Avenue S.W. is a major arterial that services a potential high volume industrial and office park area. Lind Avenue S.W. is designated as a secondary arterial on the City's 6-Year Street Program while both S.W. 16th Street and East Valley Road are considered collector arterials. Additional right-of-way should be obtained on both Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 16th Street to comply with City codes. H. DE:PARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the short plat request, file Sh. P1-022-85, by Valley Office and Industrial Park, Inc. be approved subject to the fog lowing conditions: 1.Dedication of 10 feet of right-of-way along the east side of Lind Avenue S.W. 2.Dedication of 15 feet to 20 feet of right-of-way to create a proper alignment for S.W. 16th Street be dedicated on the north sides of proposed lot No. 1 and No. 4. s w- :L'z B-, I i ' 1 i i i 1 _ ..- ..--- I...:..' ' 4-• r-:::E- 42:.:.:. - V 1 J i.al1I Jam' i I I I O • 1 Ti . .a 11 I I I I•a.f :/ IIIIill I N. 1 1 I rt 1 iii it 1II'mI •• e R-41w''1 4Ii U' I - - I.,• 0 i Ti i a 1 - l`^--- , I 11 it i T — i1 III „ill .[f.... --- I III I E I I 4T A sme i Wen ss :,I I ' ! r M :-- ',s\ \ , ., ,. , Amil 1 1 -.• •. i 4. ." •:. '.-- . r FP.) /.4411113B .4.11 : 11.' . 1 .- G—.,1- , 4,,... 1 i:TA- ri.. -_. _, , ..,.", ..i:e-i-...„ r ` F ' ... 1 49 41 7 , 41/ 1, I . 1 i/ H. „ i 4 A-,,r 11 y R- 1 6— EZEG-1 i. T_ W 1 wRiGi 7/ 71,„ , 44.--- 1 ..L.. — ..Ja::::___L____1.sA 111 4 3 2 J 1 1 11lAianIHILLP;a" l_ ,' VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. SHORT PLAT-022-85 APPLICANT VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK, INCTOTAL AREA - 28.24 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS LIND AVE S.W. , EAST VALLEY ROAD, S.W. 16TH ST. AND S.W. 19TH ST. EXISTING ZONING H-1, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL AND L-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE FOUR (4) LOT SHORT PLAT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION -OFFICE COMMENTS 1• ', VAI. ' EY PLAN LA USE ELEMENT 4:4.' 7EXHIBIT „Art 10/84 os. ,, 4,„, K E Y t • .J COM - Commercial z.,x 1 P/OP - Public/Quasi-Public c _ —,r _ •. LI Light Industrial r,HI Heavy Industrial MP/M • MP(mo::' 1 MP/MO - Manufacturing Park/ I, Multiple Option1 REC - RecreationMETac Ir I. GB - Greenbelt REC—- g--- I. N),,,, ii....0_10...iip., 4 - - ,. ",. • „„,,„,... iiho,.__ .....„, 4 11.0.00.........06... 4 t —.. A. ,iiir ,..::......74‘..11 lir j...r.; i IP.:ir::.) 11.'w r ver Ai c 1 40IP 1 I ,0) .:.• ,.. .r ...otilirmo, 1 - Ir _-4-1 1 I q Y_•• t J ' -Al.,- I I e., .1. Q ‘ : j COM IE CIA • i 1 i s :_ °" T V4q i 1 ib4s::::Bill.wir tzt . 7 'A i T— — _ . T iT r Iiiiiiw t • I lj, 11 ' ; I t t u J rr 1 VIP/MO•-1 j MP/MO w ~ 1 • . . • . . • i-- •E- MP/ r__r_-,wt. r1 ' 1 : iMOCam 1 MP/MO—O I e. g i S o SW. 16TH STREET M N 69.35'25"E-4413 59' a N89°39'25 E-411.17 I) 130.>;2.' 317.77' O 1!!) 8 pN JB el W 3. nm 0=90'02'42' N N R 243 137 b z r r Q O N89.35'33'E-26113• s T I 51 9 1 toI J f Odi j pp 1 1 9 u I 3 h N 1 50 1 0. 9.4:AG 4zno z - ----49 110 1 N 89•35 36'E-264 82' 0 O h n Il 04 0 N o Cr 1J 1 1'55'25.E-5G,0.00' N B'55 2 S- I.12 o w N w - a z FCD 2 7A I— w W J. 0 4 10 P. cc La- O N IN } IN J J LAJ N j Q I<1 III I-IA 3 Qw TO O O 1.7`-QG. 3 7.3A n3 s 0 0 se 5"77.041 5(e 1.51' 50 Nor49"orw-11313.35' 0$ S.W. 19TH STREET N REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV _.. : APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED ri riti-,,)e ._ P mô ( Clice..) Y,, t,, 1.601-io 6-)41,i_e_o_12._,4_(,..f, _4,.., ' 6;4 ,_s_e....e.....4,2,..., i 4....tt--- .e.:_c-- („4,7,g,..e.„.4_,;_, aAl2.6,L__ A ie_oilef,, evp_.0_, ,a A,/66 T--A€12/1 -_,_ 4.4.,- OrKe„ 5-6,,eerv11 I - I DATE:3 18/ -- iIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE nrvIcInu tt4ns+e REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : f- /e- Ei APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED DATE; . SIG NA R t DIRECTOR OR AUTHO,PRESENTATIVE OCvlc:AU A/+nt.7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; //‹, c PPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDI IONS NOT APPROVED 7 be-i/Yt--')141)/r 7 6 &.- 7)-tie:---eatc ( ,,,iK-7_, znc,i_J -cti,-( a i e„,,,,a4 c/illei t=---- DATE: / 6-- [] tIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIViaiON : 7-1-.-i-/1/L t J`fj FFli rd APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED YJd , T/t;17 ,il 72/!e' 7'e(/ i- c=k../ „7 - ,__. ,.s-,:,( k_y i J r /" ii 71 G6 -,a 5 c 5 G-.-,5s- l`' 1/2Sj, 5, 9rw 7 A 4/ 4_,.-r C r-rl r ',xCY 1.- <<-/ 17r_ fir. , i S 1, c y( C I- e Y-"f" z_ ' 7 )"r-E/- 4 /5 f1 L. ,1-/ . C;. f 249 l' '.,-`- / (4-h- '3 / it' ,: L K_ i '2----G_ / `- ,5,/-, , 7,j i // 1 7 :t/<-6 2-i, 74t .2, ,Y v-rr c._)c-_l' Z_V - 7- a c2_!-DATE: -- : : . 5///c ZLc 1 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RFYlelQH_511962 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : F /I- APPROVED 0 APPROVED WIT CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 21)(31( P--.4 .--'.€----- >z-e --c-t-L--*--..(____ _.(,..,71:7- c,,fe-,. 4-ert.4-a-z, 5 iv--st Ale-A456: d--4tJ Slot AT celya,.-rd Cr,T 41 . Cy .-,.,. 1 J L r,,-1-4. SCS- ,prom V 6f3 DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 0l"/41Ty . --A16//ti.E.E,ehtie.c. 11 APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EI NOT APPROVED MITT APPROVAL SIIIIECT 11 I 3/ 2%s 144 I92 057 Ass: lc' 6G. L IE COMERS AMMO • MATER F5 W-47¢ OTo se c' -''?a') a II COMERS WEENIE • Still No S-91 4rPhezi, iTEM 1EVELOPMIEIT CHARGE • WATER y,E5 100.04/6-41.Fi: ex/230,/. •iii' 019, 205. 3S STEM IEVELMOT COARSE • SEWER E5 F .D4/50•F7 I, 234 /31.447- #49, 205 3r ECIAI ASSESSMENT AREA CRAM - MA1ER No 4 9?; y/D. 76' EMI A.MSSMENT AREA CHARGE • SEWER &W IS'Fa< Plum TA , emu'y 6446-Nlu(5 44.10 PROYEI WATE1 PLAN rorD_ X)/ u?i iTD C-0Sesigt94 cN iurc-to2 Wi clove, PROVED SEWER PLAN Y65 PROVER FIRE IIIRAIT LOCATMIS r./ a A-tT'` 11 FINE DEPT. a,4 9c1,-;.422,7 RE FLOW ANALYSIS evs5 a_DATE: 4 - 2/ - r`S SIGNATURE 0 DIRECTOR 0" THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIST "" : r- El-WPPROVEI) El 'PROVED WITH CONDITIONS 410 ONOT APPROVED DATE ; IGNAT RE of D EGTu^', nQRIZED " "nRESENTATIVE a tr.slea F '1QA' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : EAPPROVEI EIJAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EINOT APPROVED RX14/Cd°t4112-L' r DATE ; n 3"15 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOAUTHOR ZED RE RESENTATIVE OF R42 i T BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENTt z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR o o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 c' 0gT&- D SEPIEMO P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCI-i MAYOR May 7, 1985 Valley Office and Industrial Park, Inc. 3650 Mayfield Road Cleveland, Ohio 44121 Re: Application for short plat approval to subdivide approximately 28.24 acres of industrial zoned property into four (4) lots, file Short Plat-022-85; property located between Lind Avenue S.W. and East Valley Road and between S.W. 16th Street and S.W. 19th Street. Dear Mr. F E tterley: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned E pplication on March 8, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearirg Examiner has been scheduled for May 14, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. 1 he applica-it or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, kb Roger J. Bl< lock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:c:. 1532Z_-2 S OF RE4/ ado tw;mot ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT f. x RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 co O P 1 t6D SEPjE4\ O BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR May 7, 1985 William Stewart Fetterley, AIA Valley C ffice and Industrial Park, Inc. 800 S.W. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 Re: Application for short plat approval to subdivide approximately 28.24 acres of irdustrial zoned property into four (4) lots, file Short Plat-022-85; property located between Lind Avenue S.W. and East Valley Road and between S.W. 16th Street and S.W. 19th Street. Dear Mr Fetterley: T he City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 8, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for May 14, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any ques`_ions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, RogerJ. Bla lo'k9Y Zoning AJministrator RJB:JMNM:cl 1532Z-1 PENUILDING & ZONING DEPOIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - N/A APPLICATION NO(S) : SH PL-022-85 (SHORT PLAT) PROPONENT : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. PROJECT TITLE : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SHORT PLAT APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 28.24 ACRES OF INDUSTRIAL ZONED PROPERTY INTO FOUR (4) LOTS. LOCATION : LOCATED BETWEEN LIND AVENUE S.W. AND EAST VALLEY ROAD, AND BETWEEN S.W. 16th STREET AND S.b . 19th STREET. TO : Ei PUBLIC JORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : N/A OENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 4/2/85 UT :LITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PRE:VENT I ON BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDIN(, & ZONING DEPARTMENT gPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS :_, COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON FEBRUARY 19, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 4/ 62- El-APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED DATE : ' /4 ac SIGNAT RE OF CCTV ORIZ_EL` "r""RFSENTATIVE REN' . JUILDING & ZONING DEP . ..IENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — N/A APPLICATION NO(S) : SH PL-022-85 (SHORT PLAT) PROPONENT : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. PROJECT TIT_E : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SHORT PLAT APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATED 28.24 ACRES OF INDUSTRIAL ZONED PROPERTY INTO FOUR (4) LOTS. LOCATION : LOCATED BETWEEN LIND AVENUE S.W. AND EAST VALLEY ROAD, AND BETWEEN S.W. 16th STREET AND S.W. 19th STREET. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : N/A EJGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 4/2/85 El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS )Y RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS ' COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M ON FEBRUARY 19, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Ei APPROVED Ell APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Rft-eA9Vd`- f 4 • ' ,DATE : Al 3-` 5 SIGNATURE OF DIREC OR AUTHOR ZED RE 'RESENTATIVE RENT. _WILDING & ZONING DEPS o SENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENTON ECF - N/A MAR 1 .: 1985 APPLICATION IJO(S) : SH PL-022-85 (SHORT PLAT) ut-v}t.oplli ncpr. PROPONENT : JALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. PROJECT TITLE : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SHORT PLAT APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 28.24 ACRES OF INDUSTRIAL ZONED PROPERTY INTO FOUR (4) LOTS. 1 LOCATION : LOCATED BETWEEN LIND AVENUE S.W. AND EAST VALLEY ROAD, AND BETWEEN S.W. 16th STREET AND S.Y . 19th STREET. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : N/A OEINGINEERING DIVISION t ! TFAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 4/2/85 OU1ILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PE:EVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDINNG & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT 4POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED 6-/MI64'i - i-f/Li,gLeA.41- Covi-4-416V Z4 1( 'e ce) TOI, 6-,,,,,21,,„-_, ,e,r, 0 , c-61-- -:.--Y a,b2_00,_ ,e,t,0 vp-, , --_,,e,.. A/66 ,-,--- Led 6.-,, 64 - . . , 5--- ,1 , / 7i,41},_,, v y; DATE :73//0 --- 1 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR JTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REN' _ _WILDING & ZONING DEPS . ..TENT L L DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE EET ECF - N/A MAR 1 2 1985 APPLICATION NO(S) : SH PL-022-85 (SHORT PLAT) PROPONENT : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. PROJECT TITLE : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SHORT PLAT APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 28.24 ACRES OF INDUSTRIAL ZONED PROPERTY INTO FOUR (4) LOTS. LOCATION : LOCATED BETWEEN LIND AVENUE S.W. AND EAST VALLEY ROAD, AND BETWEEN S.W. 16th STREET AND S.U. 19th STREET. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : N/A DENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 4/2/85 El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION fEj FIRE PRi:VENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING; & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 19, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED r-] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED DATE : 0SIGNARIRECTORORAUTHPRESENTATIVE RENT DUILDING & ZONING DEP.' mENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - N/A APPLICATION NO(S) : SH PL-022-85 (SHORT PLAT) PROPONENT : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. PROJECT TITLE : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BRIEF DESCR. PTION OF PROJECT : APPLICATION FOR SHORT PLAT APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 28.24 ACRES OF INDUSTRIAL ZONED PROPERTY INTO FOUR (4) LOTS. LOCATION : _OCATED BETWEEN LIND AVENUE S.W. AND EAST VALLEY ROAD, AND BETWEEN S.W. 16th STREET AND S. I.! 19th STREET. TO : 111 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : N/A El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : _ 4/2/85 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING, & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE I EPARTMENT Li POLICY IEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS :_ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 ; 00 P .M, ON FEBRUARY 19, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; f is ji E APPROVED l ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED 42Jd i /70 7 -Z/ T.2!! /w o r A Bey i s 7 f4f as --e<5' o 7 X y' c c y e pao/ yeQ n 09 6 ATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE PEN . BUILDING & ZONING DEP* U SENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - N/A APPLICATION NO(S) : SH PL-022-85 (SHORT PLAT) PROPONENT : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. PROJECT TITE : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SHORT PLAT APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATED 28.24 ACRES OF INDUSTRIAL ZONED PROPERTY INTO FOUR (4) LOTS. LOCATION : LOCATED BETWEEN LIND AVENUE S.W. AND EAST VALLEY ROAD, AND BETWEEN S.W. 16th STREET AND S.W. 19th STREET. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : N/A EIGINEERING DIVISION ETFAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 4/2/85 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ri PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDIN3 & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE )EPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR : UGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 19, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : DAPPROVEDEAPPROVEDLJFI" CWITONDITIONS NOT APPROVED z>/3 1 1", a, 1 44A Scc p-of V 2 DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REN' . 1JUILDING & ZONING DEP 1 "VENT Renton Fire Dept. p DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEVI ki-EAfr-71- ECF - N/A MAR 'I 2 lc -— APPLICATION NO(S) : SH PL-022-85 (SHORT PLAT) PROPONENT : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. PROJECT TITLE : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SHORT PLAT APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 28.24 ACRES OF INDUSTRIAL ZONED PROPERTY INTO FOUR (4) LOTS. LOCATION : LOCATED BETWEEN LIND AVENUE S.W. AND EAST VALLEY ROAD, AND BETWEEN S.W. 16th STREET AND S. ti. 19th STREET. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : N/A Li ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 4/2/85 ElUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ri FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU O PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ei POLICE DEPARTMENT O POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT O OTHERS :_ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M , ON FEBRUARY 19, 1985 REVIEWING DEPORTMENT/DIVISION : 0774/Ty 4-tea/AIE,E,e/AJ 111 APPROVED z APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Ei NOT APPROVED UTftIIY APPROVAL SINCE Tf 3/ 2a FL- F4/92 I57 OSs. /i_ 1/1"..-.)_,-134-4t:1- -.11) LATE COMERS ARIEEMENI - WATER YAS W-474 CM Be- ceic"cwieo) LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER No S-97,XP/,eo SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER Y,E5 AD.D4/SQ.ET X/234 434.4eLJ_ 049, 20-61 3g SYSTEM BEVELIPAIINT CHARGE . SEWER YES $D.D t/5i•FT 4 234, /34.441= 049,20.5 3f. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER NO 4 9g '{/D. 7(' SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SEWERj IS/ Foot r-noAra`G to,urY 644E4t5 ,auo APPROVED WATER PLAN l To7,oc_ )0' win../7-/ Cas ievr5 a./ imf60.+oc to owe> APPROVED SEWER PLAN Y65 Q, APPROVED FIRE NYIRANT LOLATIONS I1 FIRE OEPT. Gl xi v-- t FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS9 C6COLJ__E6ik_1 7 DATE :gS"-- SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR 0 THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REN' _ _WILDING & ZONING DEP . ..TENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - N/A APPLICATION NO(S) : SH PL-022-85 (SHORT PLAT) PROPONENT : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. PROJECT TIT_E : VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; APPLICATION FOR SHORT PLAT APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 28.24 ACRES OF INDUSTRIAL ZONED PROPERTY INTO FOUR (4) LOTS. LOCATION : LOCATED BETWEEN LIND AVENUE S.W. AND EAST VALLEY ROAD, AND BETWEEN S.W. 16th STREET AND 5. 4. 19th STREET. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE ; N/A 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 4/2/85 0 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PR=VENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT EIBUILDINI3 ZONING DEPARTMENT E] POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS :_, COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 19, 1985 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ;1 _ _./ e_e/p. APPROVED Eil APPROVED WITH CONDI IONS NOT APPROVEDzi A'34740-11-(7 .._...___, Ag?z ,,„ e-zirSi<-c)74--d` '11-1‘ /r )14g4)rj1 7 6---cc-cj- DATE : -/'E--r SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR REaRFcENTATIVE 1516Z 410 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON MAY 14, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK SHORT PLAT Application for short plat approval to subdivide approximately 28.24 acres of industrial zoned property into four (4) lots, file Short Plat-022-85; property located between Lind Avenue S.W. and East Valley Road and between S.W. 16th Street and S.W. 19th Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 14, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : May 3, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE M. SAMEK-McKAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT FIVE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN FIVE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in }h'L /VT o N on the 3rd day of May, 1985. C ,,c0L, SIGNED: OF R lam r a o Nit 9,0 E 0, 9gTep SEPTE P City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON MAY 14, 1985 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: SHORT PLAT-022-85 REZONE From_ To Li SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To Li SITE APPROVAL I x I SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of 4 Lots PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED BET Eff LIND AVENUE S.W. AND EAST VALLEY ROAD AND BETWEEN S,W, 16TH STREET AND S.W. 19TH STREET. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION SIGNIFICANT ; NON—SIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING& ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOU' PROPER AUTHORIZATION Ba S THE AUSTIN COMPANY 800 sw 16TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 206-226-8300 TO. 04'02,i3 ATE: 5 pvoic L 06l DvzW GO6 MIS IFIJ 50 v . 7-0/V/ b'v '-, 5S VoPit SUBJECT: R2 OwnerT2 Pm-77 W.O. NO. S5 5&cn ( x c ) GENTLEMEN: WE ARE TRANSMITTING THE FOLLOWING: ( ) DRAWINGS SPECIFICATIONS TRACINGS kbSisl-9- 1Ps 2O d OS PQ57 S%/iv iz) OZcl o ,FC USE-n > 4/,-tL/A/ 5 /t5 c/-} 7V 7-P. ---#0t/Cz / Se- PST; VERY TRULY YOURS, C yewk ()se- FOR YOUR APPROVAL TH AU TI COMPA Y AN:)/OR COMMENTS FOR YOUR INFORMATION C,L - U/r6se R2 % CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SUBDIVISION FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION NO. 2 APPLICANT: VALLEY OFFICE & INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. APPLICATION NUMBER: SHORT PLAT-022-85 The following provides a list of the names of property owners and their addresses who own land within 300 feet of the subject plat. The following provides a list of property owners and their addresses who own land within 300 feet of the subject site. The following individuals were mailed notices of the public hearing on the subject plat as prescribed by RCW 58.17.090 and Renton City Code. Chapter 11, Renton Subdivision Ordinance. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER Powers, Jr. , Frank J. & P.O. Box 508 334040-4035 John H. Renton, WA 98055 Hardebeck, Jerry L. P.O. Box 3308 334040-3885 Redmond, WA 98073 Leuen, Bruce L. & P.O. Box 3308 334040-3890 Nancy M. Redmond, WA 98073 Davis, Charles W. & 234 S.W. 16th St. 334040-3645 Pamela A. Renton, WA 98055 Dave & Swede's Service 208 S.W. 16th St. 334040-3655 Renton, WA 98055 MacGregor, Robert S. 15823 S.W. Furwaod Blvd.334040-3146 Renton, WA 98055 Bailey, P. G. & P.O. Box 25191 334040-3340 Monnahan, R. F. Seattle, WA 98125 Valley Office & Industrial 3650 Mayfield Road 334040-4006 Park, Inc. Cleveland, OH 44121 Prudential Insurance Co. 2049 Century Park East, 334040-4000 Suite 1300 Los Angeles, CA 90067 City of Renton City Treasurer 334040-0425 City Hall Renton, WA 98055 Valley Office & Industrial 3650 Mayfield Road 334040-0585 Park, Inc. Cleveland, OH 44121 Valley Office & Industrial 3650 Mayfield Road 334040-0745 Park, Inc. Cleveland, OH 44121 BEMP Associates 18000 Pacific Highway South, 192305-9013 Suite 1115 Seattle, WA 98188 ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CERTIFICATION I, Wm. Stewart Fetterley , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. AT TEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at Seattle, King County on the l lth day of Apri 1 . 1985. jfite:12—SIGNE • I, hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject p1 t were mailed on to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at kE/Y 7-6 N on the to TN day ofgy J q RE; . SIGNED: ,,Q.pvt1 L4Y FORM 190 OF R4 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR p r` MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 co- 0 17-61) SEP7s-. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR May 3, 1985 William Stewart Fetterley Valley Office & Industrial Park, Inc. 800 S.W. 16:h Street Renton, WA 98055 Re: Appl cation for short plat approval to subdivide approximately 28.24 acres of indug trial zoned property into four (4) lots, file Short Plat-022-85; property located between Lind Avenue S.W. and East Valley Road and between S.W. 16th Street and S.W. 19th Street. Dear Mr. Fetterley: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 8, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for May 14, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor o City Hall. The applic€nt or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questiois, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:c 1 1527Z 00( o ITY OF RENTC ( FILE NO(S): ts cal : BuILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT S19f 0? 54 , koli N 0 MASTER APPLICATION ,„-t.---) NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is o comprehensive application form, only those 2 items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed.7 1 Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME M n 1 2 1985 FEES Valley Office & Industrial Park, Inc.Q REZONE*(FROM TO ADDRESS 800 S.W. 16th Street 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* Renton, Washirgton 98055 CD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* SITE PLAN APPROVAL TELEPHONE SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 206) 226-8800 No. of Cubic Yards: Q VARIANCE* CONTACT PERSON From Section: Justification Required NAME Wm. Stewart Fetterley, AIA ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 1 ,305. 13 ' 800 S.W. 16th Street SHORT PLAT 575 + S1 ,230. 13 CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Renton, Washii?cton 98055 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 206) 226-800 WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: Foul" (4) NAME PLAT NAME: Valley Office & Industrial Park, Inc. ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 3650 Mayfield Road PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP a FINAL Cleveland, Ohio 44121 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE El Residential Q Industrial a Commercial 1::] Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESi Between Lind Ave. & East Valley & Bety een SW 16th & SW 19th Streets TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING O PRELIMINARY Vacant H-1 & LI FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Unplanned Fu :ure Development NUMBER OF SPACES: D ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES TOTAL FEES $1 ,3O5. 13 AREA: 1,230,134.4 23.24 STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAMP 11 \V/ I APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: Lill APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: MAR 81985 CI Accepted U Incomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: QAccepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: 0 y Building Design Eng. IDJ Fire I Parks Q Police n Policy Dev. ran Traffic Eng. c5D Utilities REVISED 1-f1-PA a Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). That portion of vacant Blocks 19, 20 and 23, C.D. Hillman' s Earlinoton Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Div. No. 1 as per plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74, records of King County, lying west of the East Valley frontage road and east of Lind Avenue S.W. , which is described by deed A.F.N. 7712160930. Except the north 15 feet of said Block 23 and the west half of the north 15 feet of vacant Main Street, except vacant Lots 49, 50 and 51 and that portion of vacant Lots 8, 9 and 10 lying west of said frontage road. AFFIDAVIT I, Wm. Stewart Fetterlev being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner,EMAYAirXiSt(MiViiiiiiiq involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 8th DAY OF March 19 85 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF r. WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT Seattle 6 '2L---Jac k E . oltz gm . tewart &erl ey Name of Notary Public)Signature of DAViii,r3 Owner's Representative) 3921 S . W . Barton Street Seattle , Washington 98136 800 S . W. 16th Street Address) . Address) Renton , Washington 98055 City) State) (Zip) Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 NDING OF FILE FiLEnnEOho